Cities Index.
PowerPoint Presentation

Burbank City Council
November 1, 2022

Document
PowerPoint Presentation
Meeting
November 1, 2022
Body
Burbank City Council
Original file
232 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on burbank.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

POLICE

DEPARTMENT
Evaluation of the
Use of Community Service
Officers
Burbank City Council
November 1, 2022
 Examination of using Community
Service Officers
 Option to improve effective and
efficient service delivery
 Use of non-sworn employee positions
to perform non-emergency duties,
such as:
 Completion of “cold” crime reports
 Traffic collision reports
 Response to quality of life / nuisance
complaints
 The Burbank Police Department
currently utilizes two non-sworn job
classifications to perform some of
these duties
 Full-time Police Technicians (8)
 Records Bureau
 Investigations Bureau
 Traffic Bureau
 Part-time Police Cadets (7)
 Community events
 Abandoned property
 Front counter
 Research, data entry, property
inventory
 Survey of 13 comparable agencies in
the region.
 5 use non-sworn positions to conduct
duties at the station and
non-
emergency duties in the field:
 Anaheim PD
 Huntington Beach PD
 Pasadena PD
 Santa Monica PD
 South Pasadena PD
 Different terms for similar positions:
 Community Service Officer
 Police Service Representative
 Public Service Officer
 Most used 8 or fewer positions.
 All wore uniforms, drove marked City
vehicles, and were authorized to issue
parking citations
 Duties included, but not limited to:
 Traffic collision reports
 “Cold” crime reports
 Traffic control
 Noise complaints
 Pay Range – varied based on city,
seniority/steps, and duties:
 $58,000 to $75,000 / year
 Average annual position cost (with
benefits):
 $90,055
Potential Benefits
 Non-sworn career path /
development track
 Reduction in demands for sworn
officer resources
 Allows sworn officers to focus efforts
on proactive crime prevention and
investigation, emergency response,
community outreach, and traffic
enforcement
 Reduced response times
 More cost-effective allocation of
resources
Considerations
 Limitations
 Non-sworn staff will be unable to
enforce moving violations or criminal
code violations
 Community
understanding/expectations
 Safety Equipment / Training
 Widely varied between agencies
 From zero to defensive tactics training
/ OC / ballistic vests
 Agency specific, and can be tailored to
meet the needs of the Department
 The Patrol Division is structured with
 Four Patrol Groups –scheduled for
24/7 coverage
 One Traffic Bureau
 Initial assessment and
recommendation:
 Assign one CSO to each Patrol Group
and the Traffic Bureau
 After a one-year assessment, the CSO
position assignments could be
expanded or adjusted to meet
identified needs
 The Police Department is currently
working with Management Services
to develop the CSO classification
through the Civil Service process
 A Classification Amendment Review
was submitted in September, and is
in the review process
 Next steps would be consideration /
approval by the Civil Service Board
POLICE

DEPARTMENT
Questions?
Captain Adam Cornils
[email protected]
818-238-3216

← All documents from this meeting