RFP Evaluation Score Sheet
RFP BPD-2022-001 Parking Enforcement Services
Respondent
SC-1-
Comprehens-
iveness of
Proposal
SC-2 -
Contractor
Capabilities
SC-3 -
Integration
Abilities and
Unique
Services
SC-4 -
Operational
Plan
SC-5 -
References
SC-7 -
Presentation
Evaluation
and Site Visit
Technical
Score Total
SC-6 -Price
Proposal
(scored by
Purchasing)
TOTAL
SCORE
Points Available 10 17 10 28 7 8 80 20 100
RANK
ACE Parking 5 10 5 14 4 4 42 15 57 3
LAZ Parking 8 14 8 23 5 7 65 20 85 1*
SP Plus Corporation 8 14 10 23 6 5 66 19 85 2
Total 3 year
price
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
ACE Parking 816,138.40$ 703,208.00$ 731,330. 40$ 2,250,676.80$ LAZ Parking 907,440.56$ 817,235.76$ 855,974. 04$ 2,580,650.36$ SP Plus Corporation 1,133,909.32$ 820,298.08$ 843,924. 32$ 2,798,131.72$ MEDIAN PRICE 952,496.09$ 780,247.28$ 810,409. 59$ 2,543,152.96$ COMPETITIVE RANGE (HIGH TO LOW) 317,770.92$ 117,090.08$ 124,643. 64$ 547,454.92$
A B C D E F
Rank Order - Technical Score - Proposer
Technical
Score* Price $/Point Percent Price Weight Price Points
3 ACE Parking 42 $2,250,677 $53,588 74% 20 15
2 LAZ Parking 65 $2,580,650 $39,702 100% 20 20
1 SP Plus
Corporation 66 $2,798,132 $42,396 94% 20 19
A = Proposers points from all categories other than price (technical score) B = Proposers price from their proposal
C = B/A - allocates points from technical score in relation to overall proposed price D = Percent of price points awarded
E = Weight of the price criterion
F = ((Lowest C/C being calculated)*D)
*SC1-5, SC7
Proposed Pricing
(assumes PM, LPR, 4 PERs @40hours/week and
4 vehicles incl. 4 initial equips)
*Tie score broken by
proposed lower price.
ATTACHMENT 5