54.1 52.9
56.8 54.3
51.9 52.1
52.5 52.2
54.3 47.9
35.0 40.0
45.0 50.0
55.0 60.0
65.0 70.0
75.0 80.0
85.0 0123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 Hourly Leq(dBA)
Hour Beginning
U:\UcJobs\_12100-12500\_12300\12343\Fieldwork\12343_L4_Summary 62 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-284
Date: Location: Meter: Piccolo I JN: 12343
Project: Burbank Water & Power Campus Analyst: R. Saber Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eq 0 59.4 81.6 45.9 69.0 67.0 64.0 62.0 55.0 50.0 48.0 47.0 46.0 59.4 10.0 69.4 1 56.4 74.2 45.2 67.0 66.0 62.0 60.0 53.0 50.0 47.0 47.0 46.0 56.4 10.0 66.4 2 55.3 76.3 45.2 67.0 64.0 61.0 58.0 50.0 48.0 46.0 46.0 45.0 55.3 10.0 65.3 3 57.4 78.6 45.8 69.0 66.0 63.0 61.0 54.0 51.0 47.0 47.0 46.0 57.4 10.0 67.4 4 61.5 84.4 48.9 71.0 69.0 66.0 65.0 59.0 55.0 51.0 50.0 50.0 61.5 10.0 71.5 5 64.8 83.9 51.2 74.0 72.0 69.0 68.0 64.0 60.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 64.8 10.0 74.8 6 69.4 91.7 54.1 79.0 76.0 73.0 71.0 67.0 64.0 58.0 56.0 55.0 69.4 10.0 79.4 7 68.5 90.5 55.0 76.0 74.0 72.0 71.0 68.0 66.0 60.0 59.0 57.0 68.5 0.0 68.5 8 68.0 86.9 54.8 76.0 74.0 72.0 71.0 68.0 65.0 59.0 58.0 56.0 68.0 0.0 68.0 9 69.7 93.3 55.0 79.0 76.0 73.0 71.0 69.0 66.0 60.0 59.0 57.0 69.7 0.0 69.7 10 67.9 89.1 53.1 77.0 75.0 72.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 59.0 58.0 56.0 67.9 0.0 67.9 11 69.1 91.9 54.8 78.0 74.0 72.0 71.0 68.0 66.0 61.0 59.0 56.0 69.1 0.0 69.1 12 67.8 84.9 54.1 76.0 75.0 72.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 60.0 59.0 57.0 67.8 0.0 67.8 13 70.1 95.3 54.5 78.0 76.0 72.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 59.0 58.0 56.0 70.1 0.0 70.1 14 72.7 91.0 51.8 85.0 83.0 78.0 76.0 69.0 66.0 59.0 56.0 54.0 72.7 0.0 72.7 15 68.0 89.9 51.8 77.0 74.0 71.0 70.0 67.0 64.0 59.0 57.0 54.0 68.0 0.0 68.0 16 67.4 89.9 52.5 74.0 73.0 71.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 59.0 57.0 55.0 67.4 0.0 67.4 17 67.4 83.2 52.3 75.0 73.0 71.0 70.0 68.0 65.0 58.0 57.0 55.0 67.4 0.0 67.4 18 67.4 85.7 52.2 76.0 74.0 71.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 59.0 57.0 55.0 67.4 0.0 67.4 19 66.6 84.6 52.4 73.0 72.0 70.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 59.0 58.0 55.0 66.6 5.0 71.6 20 66.4 86.7 51.5 75.0 73.0 70.0 69.0 66.0 63.0 57.0 55.0 53.0 66.4 5.0 71.4 21 64.2 77.7 49.5 71.0 70.0 69.0 68.0 65.0 61.0 55.0 53.0 51.0 64.2 5.0 69.2 22 67.5 94.8 49.9 72.0 70.0 68.0 67.0 63.0 59.0 52.0 51.0 50.0 67.5 10.0 77.5 23 60.5 77.4 48.3 70.0 69.0 66.0 65.0 60.0 55.0 50.0 49.0 49.0 60.5 10.0 70.5 Timeframe Hour L
eq L max L min L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% Min 67.4 83.2 51.8 74.0 73.0 71.0 70.0 67.0 64.0 58.0 56.0 54.0 Max 72.7 95.3 55.0 85.0 83.0 78.0 76.0 69.0 66.0 61.0 59.0 57.0
69.0 77.3 75.1 72.3 70.8 67.7 65.3 59.3 57.8 55.7
Min 64.2 77.7 49.5 71.0 70.0 69.0 68.0 65.0 61.0 55.0 53.0 51.0 Max 66.6 86.7 52.4 75.0 73.0 70.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 59.0 58.0 55.0
65.9 73.0 71.7 69.7 69.0 66.0 63.0 57.0 55.3 53.0
Min 55.3 74.2 45.2 67.0 64.0 61.0 58.0 50.0 48.0 46.0 46.0 45.0 Max 69.4 94.8 54.1 79.0 76.0 73.0 71.0 67.0 64.0 58.0 56.0 55.0
63.9 70.9 68.8 65.8 64.1 58.3 54.7 50.3 49.6 48.8
Energy Average Average:
71.7Night
Energy Average Average:
Evening 24-Hour CNEL (dBA)
67.3 68.5 63.9
Night
L eq (dBA)
Day
Energy Average Average:
24-Hour Daytime Nighttime
Evening
L5 - Located on Victory Boulevard, west of the Project site, adjacent to an existing commercial area.
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Tuesday, April 09, 2019
Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Night
Day
59.4 56.4
55.3 57.4
61.5 64.8
69.4 68.5
68.0 69.7
67.9 69.1
67.8 70.1
72.7 68.0
67.4 67.4
67.4 66.6
66.4 64.2
67.5 60.5
35.0 40.0
45.0 50.0
55.0 60.0
65.0 70.0
75.0 80.0
85.0 0123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 Hourly Leq(dBA)
Hour Beginning
U:\UcJobs\_12100-12500\_12300\12343\Fieldwork\12343_L5_Summary 63 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-285
Burbank Water and Power Magnolia Campus Drainage Improvement Noise Impact Analysis 12343-02 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
64 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-286
CITY OF BURBANK
INITIAL STUDY / BURBANK WATER AND POWER CAMPUS PROJECT
Exhibit 1
REGIONAL LOCATION N
Google Maps
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-287
CITY OF BURBANK
INITIAL STUDY / BURBANK WATER AND POWER CAMPUS PROJECT
Exhibit 2
SITE CONTEXT
N
C I T Y O F
B U R B A N K
LOS ANGELES RIVER
BURBANK WESTERN CHANNEL
PROJECT SITE
BURBANK WATER & POWER
Google Maps
5 134
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-288
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-289
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-290
Existing Western Burbank Channel Wall
Prepared for:
City of Burbank, CA
March 31, 2021
Structural Design Calculations
22431 Antonio Parkway ● Suite B160-470 ● Rancho Santa Margarita ● CA ● 92688 ● 949-713-6780 ●
connection to the
Rende Consulting Group
Prepared by:
Gregory L. Rende, P.E.
R.C.E. No. 54529
Reinforced Concrete Collar
MNS Engineers, Inc.
201 N. Calle Cesar Chavez, Suite 300
Santa Barbara, CA 93103
for
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-291
Project: Job No. Sheet of
Designed By: Gregory L. Rende, P.E. Date:
Item:
Existing & Finished Grade
Existing Reinf Conc Channel 9' Soil density = pcf
Water density = pcf
A. Design Criteria
1 / Code References
a- EM 1110-2-2014
b- EM 1110-2-2100
c- EM 1110-2-2007
d- EM 1110-2-2502
e- EM 1110-2-2902
f- Concrete Pipe Design Manual, American Concrete Pipe Association g- Design Data, Highway Live Load on Concrete Pipe, American Concrete Pipe Association 2 / Loading
For 18 inch RCP (D-Load 1900) located at 9ft from the finished grade Pipe Inside Diameter D
i =f t
Pipe Outside Diameter D = ft
Pipe Length L = ft
Soil Height Above Pipe h = ft
Soil Density g = pcf
Pipe Self Weight w
p = lb/ft
Soil Weight Above Pipe ws = lb/ft
Water Weight Inside Pipe ww = lb/ft
Load Factor LF = (3-2, EM-1100-2-2014)
Load Combination: U = LF*(wp + ws + ww) U = lb/ft
B. Shear and Moment
Moment at Collar: Mu = U*0.5*L2 Mu = k-ft
Shear at Collar: Vu = U*L Vu = kips
12303
98.4 49.2
2.2 3.00
3.67 4.00
9.00 140
526
4624
442
140
62.5 36" RCPCollar
Reinforced Concrete Collar 20-258
Existing Western Burbank Channel Wall
Reinforced Concrete Collar Design
© Rende Consulting Group, Inc.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-292
Project: Job No. Sheet of
Designed By: Gregory L. Rende, P.E. Date:
Item:
C. Analysis of Collar Connection Reinforced Concrete:
β1 =
f 'c = ksi
fy = ksi
Es = ksi
t= i n
b= i n
As = in2
a. Steel Ratio (3.5, EM-1100-2-2014)
/ ρbal = /= / ρbal =
b. Compute the Flexural Capacity
Rebar Cover (to center of rebar), c: c = in
Effective Depth, d = t - c d = in
Strength Reduction Factor,
φ: φ =
Depth of Compression Block, a = As * fy / (0.85 * f 'c * b) a= i n Flexural Capacity, φMn = φAsfy(d-a/2) φMn = k-ft > k-ft c. Check Shear
Strength Reduction Factor, φ: φ =
Shear Capacity, φVc = φ2(f 'c)1/2(b)(d) φVc = kips > kips
26.50 98.4
OK
OK
49.2 < 0.25 - OK -
Detailed Analysis
NOT Required=> The detailed analyses of the serviceability limit states ARE NOT required.
3.50 0.02851
ρact 0.0219689ρact 0.00063
0.028510.85*β1*(f 'c)
fy
x 87 + fy
87 =ρbal =
ρact
1.24 (30.00) = ρact(66.00)= As
(b)(d) =
t
b
0.85 4
60 29000
30 66
1.24 = 0.00063
ρbal =
0.85 188.0
0.85 0.3316
1665.4
Existing Western Burbank Channel Wall
Reinforced Concrete Collar Design
Reinforced Concrete Collar 20-258
© Rende Consulting Group, Inc.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-293
CITY OF BURBANK
INITIAL STUDY / BURBANK WATER AND POWER CAMPUS PROJECT
Exhibit 5
PROPOSED OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-294
BWP Campus Stormwater Improvement Project
Initial Study May 2023
Attachment 4
Notice of Intent
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-295
WATER
AND
POWER
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
for the Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Project This serves as the City of Burbank's Notice of Intent to adopt a recirculated Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Burbank Water & Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project, prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CEQA Guidelines, and local implementation procedures.
Name of Project: Burbank Water & Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Project Location: Burbank Water & Power Campus, 164 W. Magnolia Blvd., Burbank CA 91502 Lead Agency: City of Burbank, Burbank Water & Power, 164 W . Magnolia Blvd., Burbank Project Description : The project proposes construction of stormwater improvements on the Burbank Water & Power (BWP) campus and the adjacent off-site storm water drainage system in order to comply with Regional, State, and Federal water quality standards . The project proposes to construct drainage improvements that would allow stormwater from adjacent properties to be intercepted and discharged into the Burbank Western Channel (BWC), a tributary of the Los Angeles River, through a new outfall structure .
Once separated, on-site runoff would be largely retained on the BWP Campus and either infiltrated into the groundwater or used for cooling tower make-up (replenishment) water.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the City proposes to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the above-referenced project. The MND is based on the finding that the project's environmental effects would be less than significant with adherence to mitigation measures included in the Initial Study. The reasons to support such a finding are documented by an Initial Study prepared by the City. This notice is being recirculated with a new public review period to incorporate revisions to the Tribal Cultural Resources mitigation measures. The Initial Study, the proposed MND, and supporting materials are available for review at the City of Burbank, Burbank Water & Power, 164 W. Magnolia Blvd., Burbank, CA, 91502, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to noon and 1 :00 to 5:00 p.m. and at the City of Burbank Water and Power website, [https://www.burbankwaterandpower.com/stormwaterproject]. The environmental documents are also available for public review at the Community Services Building located at 150 North Third Street, Burbank, CA 91502, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Written comments regarding the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration must be submitted to the Burbank Water & Power prior to 5:00 p.m. on the last day of the 30-day public review/comment period (July 22, 2022). All correspondence and any questions regarding the MND should be directed to the following City staff:
NAME/TITLE: Claudia Reyes or Sean Kigerl
ADDRESS : City of Burbank, Burbank Water & Power
164 Magnolia Boulevard
Burbank, California 91502
PHONE:
EMAIL:
818.238 .3510 or 818.238.3774
CSReyes@burbankca .gov or SKigerl@burbankca .gov
Public Review Period: Begins - June 22, 2022 Ends - July 22, 2022 Public Hearing: Consideration of adoption of the MND by the City of Burbank will take place at a future date at the City of Burbank City Hall, Council Chambers, located at 275 EasfOlive Avenue, Burbank, California.
Signature: rj/0,uJli:o ~ Date: 06/16/2022
Claudia Reyes, SeniorEnVOnmenta l Engineer,
City of Burbank, Burbank Water and Power
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-296
BWP Campus Stormwater Improvement Project
Initial Study May 2023
Attachment 5
Comments
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-297
The Cultural Resource Management (CRM) Division of the Fernandeño Tataviam Band of Mission Indians reviewed the Burbank Water and Power Stormwater Improvement Project Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and finds Mitigation Measure TRIBAL-1 (see below) to be unfitting for the proposed Project. The project has the potential to impacting significant tribal cultural resources and the measures (as shown in the current draft) are not inclusive of consulting native American tribes.
Mitigation Measure TRIBAL-1: Tribal Resources – Avoidance and Monitoring. Prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing activities in native (i.e., non-fill) soil, the City shall require monitoring of all ground-disturbing activities by a qualified Archeologist . The qualified Archaeologist shall have a pre-construction meeting to explain the construction monitoring process and provide training. In addition, consultation and coordination shall be undertaken with the Native American local Tribal contacts designated by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and the Tribe(s) to determine if the city shall retain a Native American monitor to be present during all or a portion of the ground- disturbing activities within the Project area. In addition, representatives of tribes, with which the Most Likely Descendants, identified by the NAHC, or who have identified themselves directly to the City as having an interest in the BWP Campus Stormwater Improvement Project shall be invited to attend the pre-construction meeting to conduct Tribal cultural resource sensitivity training. Such sensitivity training may include a handout and focus on how to recognize Tribal cultural resources encountered during earthmoving activities.
In the event that previously unknown Tribal cultural resources are encountered during construction, the resources shall either be left in situ and avoided through redesign, or the resources shall be salvaged, recorded, and reposited at a repository consistent with the provisions of a Phase III data recovery program and the provisions of the Resource Protection Plan, specified in CUL-1. The Resource Protection Plan shall include further consultation with the identified Tribal representatives. Data recovery is not required by law or regulation. It is, though, the most commonly agreed-upon measure to mitigate adverse effects to cultural resources eligible or listed under Section 106 Criterion D/CRHR Criterion 4, as it preserves important information that would otherwise be lost.
Iss
ues with TRIBAL-1: Please explain the following
• Why is an archaeological monitor being required for tribal resources but not a native American monitor?
• Why is the NAHC being consulted to determine if the city shall retain a native American monitor?
• Why is Section 106 being referenced for this CEQA Project? • Why is the Most Likely Descendant is being referenced as a requirement to participate in the sensitivity training?
As
previously mentioned, the way the language is structured shows that the Lead Agency or consultant (Sapphos) does not have experience working and consulting with Tribal Governments, understanding the roles of archaeologist and tribal monitors, understanding the role and limitations of the Native American Heritage Commission, or the role and importance of the Most Likely Descendant (as identified by the NAHC). The FTBMI has participated in serval meetings with BWP to discuss the problems and the measures included in the Tribal Cultural Resource section of the IS/MND.
A.1-1
A.1-2
A.1-3
A.1-4
A.1-5
A.1-6
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-298
The CRM Division request that the measures below be used to replace TRIBAL-1. • FTBMI-TCR1: In the event that cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall assess the find. Work on the portions of the Projects outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The Fernandeño Tataviam Band of Mission Indians (FTBMI) shall be contacted regarding any pre-contact and/or post-contact finds and be provided information after the archaeologist makes their initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. • FTBMI-TCR2: Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), the Lead Agency or designated representative shall retain a professional Native American monitor procured by the FTBMI to observe all remaining ground-disturbing activities including, but not limited to, excavating, digging, trenching, plowing, drilling, tunneling, quarrying, grading, leveling, clearing, driving posts, auguring, blasting, stripping topsoil or similar activity, and archaeological work.
• FTBMI-TCR-3: The Lead Agency shall, in good faith, consult with the Fernandeño Tataviam Band of Mission Indians and consulting Tribes on the disposition and treatment of any Tribal Cultural Resource encountered during the Project grading.
Tribal-2 can remain as is
Mit
igation Measure TRIBAL-2: Regulatory Requirements – Human Remains. In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are encountered during excavation activities, the County Coroner shall be notified within 24 hours of the discovery. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby areas reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains within 100 feet shall occur until the County Coroner has determined the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains.
If the Count
y Coroner determines that the remains are or are believed to be Native American, s/he shall notify the NAHC in Sacramento within 24 hours. In accordance with Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code, the NAHC shall immediately notify the person(s) it believes to be the most likely descendant (MLD) of the deceased Native American. The descendants shall complete their inspection and make a recommendation within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The designated Native American representative(s) would then determine, in consultation with the City, the disposition of the human remains. The MLD’s recommendation shall be followed if feasible and may include scientific removal and non-destructive analysis of the human remains and any items associated with Native American burials. If the City rejects the MLD’s recommendations, the agency shall rebury the remains with appropriate dignity on the property within a time frame agreed upon between the City and the MLD’s in a location that will not be subject to further subsurface disturbance (14 California Code of Regulations §15064.5(e)).
I appr
eciate your time and look forward to the issues being corrected.
Res
pectfully,
A.1-7
A.1-8
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-299
Jairo F. Avila, M.A., RPA.
Tribal Historic and Cultural Preservation Officer
Cultural Resources Management Division
Tribal Historic and Cultural Preservation Department
Fernandeño Tataviam Band of Mission Indians
1019 Second Street, Suite 1
San Fernando, California 91340
Office: (818) 837-0794
Website: http://www.tataviam-nsn.us
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-300
BWP Campus Stormwater Improvement Project
Initial Study May 2023
Attachment 6
Responses to Comments
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-301
Burbank Water & Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Final Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2023 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
Response to Comments
on the
Recirculated Mitigated Negative Declaration
for the
Burbank Water & Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project (SCH # 2019129091)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
The City of Burbank (City) Department of Water and Power prepared a Recirculated Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) to assess the potential environmental effects of the Burbank Water & Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project (proposed project). The City circulated the Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt a proposed MND for public review between June 22, 2022, and July 22, 2022 (Attachment 4, Notice of Intent). The NOI for the proposed project w as delivered via certified mail to U.S. Postal Service mailings to 28 regulatory agencies and stakeholders potentially having an interest in the proposed project. The NOI was posted in the Los Angeles Times on June 22, 2022. In addition, the NOI was posted on-site on June 22, 2022. Copies of the proposed MND were made available online via the project website and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research website, and hard copies were available for review at two locations designated by the City for 30 days (see Attachment 4).
The public comment period closed on July 22, 2022 . One (1) written letter of comment was received (Attachment 5 , Notice of Intent Comment Letter ). Comment letters and specific comments are given letters and numbers for reference purposes. The comment letter is shown numbered and bracketed, with numbers representing the point addressed. This section provides responses to all comments received on the proposed MND.
A. WRITTEN COMMENTS
A1.
Fernandeño Tataviam Band of Mission Indians
Jairo F. Avila, M.A., RPA.
Tribal Historic and Cultural Preservation Officer
Cultural Resources Management Division
Tribal Historic and Cultural Preservation Department
1019 Second Street, Suite 1
San Fernando, California 91340
Office: (818) 837-0794
Website: http://www.tataviam-nsn.us
Response to Comment No. A1-1:
A clarification and revision has been made to MND Mitigation Measure TRIBAL-1 in response to the Cultural Resource Management (CRM) Division of the Fernandeño Tataviam Band of Mission Indians (FTBMI) comments. The clarification and revision add ed that p rior to the initiation of ground-disturbing activities in native ( i.e., non-fill) soil, the City shall require monitoring of all ground-disturbing activities by a Secretary of Interior Professionally Qualified Archaeologist who is a member of the Register of P rofessional Archaeologists (Qualified Archaeologist). The Qualified Archaeologist shall not only be qualified to identify tribal cultural resources but also qualified to identify many other types of cultural and paleontological resources. Additionally, the ATTACHMENT 2
A2-302
Burbank Water & Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Final Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2023 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
City has participated in extensive consultations with the FTBMI in order to to address FTBMI’s concerns.
Response to Comment No. A1-2:
A clarification and revision has been made to the MND in the Tribal Cultural Resources Section as well as in the Summary of Mitigation Measures section of the MND to Mitigation Measure TRIBAL-1. The clarification and revision add that the city may retain a Native American monitor in the event likely tribal cultural resources are identified during ground disturbance in native soils.
If it elects to retain such a monitor, such monitor shall be affiliated with the local tribe with cultural ties to the project site, and such Tribe shall also be designated by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC-Designated Tribes). Please see Mitigatio n Measure TRIBAL -1 for the full revision. Further, the Qualified Archeologist that will be on-site during ground-disturbing activities will be a Secretary of Interior Professionally Qualified Archaeologist who is a member of the Register of Professional Ar chaeologists (Qualified Archaeologist) . The Qualified Archeologist shall not only be qualified to identify tribal cultural resources but also qualified to identify many other types of cultural and paleontological resources.
Response to Comment No. A1-3:
There is no additional consultation being proposed with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC was consulted to obtain the list of tribal entities to consult with, not to determine whether to retain a Native American monitor.
Response to Comment No. A1-4:
A clarification and revision ha s been made to the MND to Mitigation Measure TRIBAL -1, to remove the mention of Section 106.
Response to Comment No. A1-5:
A clarification and revision has been made to the MND Mitigation Measure TRIBAL-1 to remove the mention of “most likely descendent” and clarify that the NAHC-Designated Tribes, or those who have identified themselves directly to the City as having an interest in the BWP Campus Stormwater Improvement Project, shall be invited to attend the pre -construction meeting to conduct Tribal cultural resource sensitivity training. Please see Mitigation Measure TRIBAL-1 for the full revision.
Response to Comment No. A1-6:
Following meetings and consultation with FTBMI, BWP has revised the mitigation measures. The City is still in completed AB 52 consultation with FTBMI to meet the requirements of AB52 , specifically regarding the development of Mitigation Measure Tribal-1. The City is makingmade a reasonable effort to complete this consultation including phone calls, emails, and exchanging multiple drafts of the proposed Tribal Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures. Such consultation with the FTBMI has occurred from March 2022 through December of 2022. As of April 4, 2023, AB 52 consultation was concluded, at which time the parties reached an impasse and BWP concluded that mutual agreement on the language in Mitigation Measure Tribal -1 cannot be reached. On April 11, 2023, an additional letter from the FTBMI was sent to BWP stating disagreement that AB 52 consultation could be complete on the grounds that additional revisions to the measure weren’t made as requested. However, BWP stands on the conclusion that mutual ATTACHMENT 2
A2-303
Burbank Water & Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Final Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2023 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
agreement on the language in Mitigation Measure Tribal-1 cannot be reached and that the parties have reached an impasse. Therefore, AB 52 consultation remains concluded as stated on April 4, 2023.
Response to Comment No. A1-7:
In response to the (CRM) Division of the (FTBMI) request to replace the MND Mitigation Measure TRIBAL-1 with three new suggested measures (FTBMI -TCR1 through TCR3) the City has provided a Draft Resource Protection Plan, as mentioned in Mitigation Measure TRIBAL -1, which will include the specifics that are detailed in the suggested measures, as part of the Plan.
The Draft Resource Protection Plan is included in the Final MND as Appendix 7.
Response to Comment No. A1-8:
No clarifications or revisions have been made to Mitigation Measure TRIBAL-2 as suggested by the CRM Division of the FTBMI.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-304
BWP Campus Stormwater Improvement Project
Initial Study May 2023
Attachment 7
Resource Protection Plan
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-305
BURBANK WATER AND POWER CAMPUS
STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
RESOURCE PROTECTION PLAN
Prepared for:
City of Burbank
Burbank Water and Power
164 Magnolia Boulevard
Burbank, CA 91502
Prepared by:
Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
430 North Halstead Street
Pasadena, California 91107
December 2022
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-306
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
Page ES-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Resource Protection Plan specifies procedures to be followed prior to and during routine maintenance and construction activities conducted in support of the Burbank Water and Power (BWP) Campus Stormwater Improvement Project (proposed Project) to ensure that damaging impacts to cultural resources are avoided or appropriately reduced by mitigation. This Resource Protection Plan provides a procedural framework for the following management measures:
• Procedures for briefing of construction supervisors and workers regardin g cultural resources
• Plan for avoidance and protection of cultural resources that are eligible or potentially eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP ), California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR); or City of Burbank (City) Designated Historic Resource (Designated Historic Resource)
• Data recovery plan guidelines for any archaeological sites found eligible for listing in the NRHP, CRHR, and Designated Historic Resource
• Curation procedures for archaeological collections, final reports, field notes , and other documentation. Repositories can include the County Natural History Museum and/or University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
• Unanticipated discovery protocol to be followed in the event th at archaeological resources are identified during excavation
• Procedures to be followed in the event of discovery of human remains
By being able to identify significant archaeological and Tribal cultural resources and implementing the management measures , the C ity is helping to ensure the survival of its significant cultural resources for future generations.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-307
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
CHAPTER 1.0
INTRODUCTION
This Resource Protection Plan was prepared for the City in order to help staff avoid and minimize impacts that might o ccur to unique archaeological and cultural resources through the course of construction activities in support of the proposed Project. Chapter 2.0, Setting has examples of significant historical and archaeological resources. The BWP Campus facilities have been fully developed since the 1950s and excavation for the proposed Project stays within the area previously disturbed during initial construction. However, ground-disturbing activities could result in the discovery of unanticipated archaeological resources as well as human remains. Such reso urces must be treated as significant cultural resources under California l aw, specifically the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The purpose of the Resource Protection Plan is to provide staff with methods to identify and address cultural resources , inc luding Nativ e American artifacts afforded protection pursuant to CEQA.
This chapter describes the intended audience for the Resource Protection Plan, a brief description of the Resource Protection Plan , the location, the management goals, and the regulat ory framework.
1.1 INTENDED AUDIENCE AND APPLICABILITY
This Resource Protection Plan was developed to support City staff, consultants, project managers, and contractors involved in construction activities that have the potential to result in the unanticipated discovery of cultural resources afforded protection pursuant to CEQA. The goal is to provide training for staff to safeguard significant cultural resources, including Native American artifacts, wherever feasible and practical. Where i t is not possible to avoid resources, the Resource Protection Plan provides a pro cess for salvage, recovery, and recordation of arch aeological resources that would normally be considered to resolve potential impacts to cultural resources consistent with California law.1
Locational information for Native American and archaeological re sources must be m anaged as confidential, pursuant to California law.2 Archaeological reports and databases containing locational information must be managed as confidential information b y the City to protect these resources from risk that the information c ould be used to l oot, vandalize, or otherwise damage sensitive cultural, archaeological, or paleontological resources. The Resource Protection Plan does not contain sensitive information related to cultural, archaeological or historical objects, structures, landscapes, resources, sacred places, or sites of concern to local Native Americans or other ethnic groups, or resources or objects described in California law.3
1 Association of Environmental Profe ssionals. 2018. “15064.5. Determi ning the Significance of Impacts t o Archaeological and Historical Resources.” 2018 CEQ A Statute and Guidelines . Page 143. Palm Des ert, CA:
Association of Environmental Professionals. p. 143
2 California Government Code § 6254(r).
3 California Public Resources Code §§ 5097.9 or 5097.993.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-308
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This Resource Protection Plan is intended to avoid or reduce impacts to all cultural resources located within the proposed Project area wherever feasible and practical. The Resource Protection Plan should be used during the course of the construction of the proposed Project. The Resource Protection Plan provides direction for cultural resource management; including avoiding, notifying, and excavating, and storing archaeological artifacts.
1.2.1 Project Location
The proposed P roject is lo cated in the city of Burbank, an a rea of land in centr al Los Ange les County, covering approximately 17.1 square miles . The city is 12 m iles north of the city of Los Angeles and 4 miles west of the City of Glendale. It is bordered on the n ortheastern edge by the Verdugo Mountains, and on the western edge by the San Fernando Valley.
The project is located in the central part of the city, at t he BWP Campus, located at 164 W .
Magnolia B oulevard. The BWP Campus is approximately 22. 5 acre s i n size. Proposed Project activities will occur on and adjacent to the BWP Campus. The proposed Project area extends from the stormwater improvements on the BWP Campus and connects to the Burbank Western Channel (BWC), which is a tributary of the Los Angeles River, via stormwater drain.
1.2.2 Scope and Purpose
This Resource Protection Plan provides procedures to be followed to ensure that impacts to cultural resources will be avoided or mitigated to less than significant levels. Cul tural resources pertain to archaeological, Tribal cultural, and built-environment resources regardless of eligibility. It describes how the C ity will comply with and implement mitigation measures. The measures that will be implemented may include:
• Planning for a voidance and protection of cultural resources that are eligibl e or potentially eligible for inclusion in the NRHP, CRHR, and/or Designated Historic Resources.
• Documenting coordination with the S tate of California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), Tribes, and individuals recommended by the NAHC.
• Planning for monitoring of sensitive archaeological sites during gr ound-disturbing project activities.
• Implementing procedures f or pre-construction briefing of construction supervisors and workers regarding cultural and Tribal resources.
• Initiating the u nanticipated discovery of archaeological r esource procedures in the event that archaeol ogical or Tribal cultural resources are identified durin g earth- disturbing activities.
• Documenting cultural resource investigations in high-quality technical reports that meet the Professional Qualification Standards of the Secretary o f the Interior.4 The
4 “Professional Qualification Standards.” National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Available at:
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-309
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
reports will then be filed with the South C entral Coast Information Center (SCCIC) and made available (without confidential site location information) to the interested public.
• Implementing curation procedures for archaeological or Tribal cultural collections, final reports, field notes, and other documentation.
• Ensuring that proper p rocedures will be follo wed in the event of discovery of human remains, which include calling the County Coroner.
1.3 MANAGEMENT GOALS
The purpose of th e Resource Protection Plan is to lay out a detailed program to avoid or resolve impacts to cultural resources listed or determined eligible for li sting in the NRHP , CRHR, and/or Designated Historic R esource. Potential impacts may occur during construction, building maintenance, and ground-disturbing activities. These activities include, but are not li mited to , grading, grubbing (removing unwanted grass or other ground cover including stumps or roots), boring (drilling holes in the soil), trenching, e xcavation, and tree planting or other major landscaping efforts. Built resources listed or determined eli gible for li sting in a historical register will be properly maintained and protected from the proposed Project using the methods described in this Resource Protection Plan. To facilitate these goals, the Resource Protection Plan provides:
• Brief description of the BWP Campus at the time of this plan and a brief history of the facility
• Brief summary of known cultural resources within the proposed Project area
• Monitoring plan to be used when ground-disturbing activities occur within undisturbed native (non-fill) soils
• General guidelines for establishing boundarie s of known or newly identified archaeological sites and excavation plans for archaeological sites determined to be eligible for inclusion in the NRHP, CRHR, and/or Designated Historic Resource
• Archaeological documentation is def ined by a research design. According t o the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Archaeological Documentation:
Archaeological documentation is a series of actions applied to properties of archeological interest. Documentation of such properties may occur at any or all levels of planning, identification, evaluation, or treatment. The nature and level of documentation is dict ated by each specif ic set of circumstances. Archaeological documentation consists of act ivities such as archival research, observation and recording of above-ground remains, and observation (dir ectly, throug h e xcavation, or indirectly, through remote sensing) of below -ground remains. Arch aeological documentation is employed for the purpose of gathering information on individual hist oric properties or groups of properties. It is guided by a framew ork of objectives
https://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/arch_stnds_9.htm
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-310
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
and methods derived from the planning process, and makes use of previous planning decisions, such as those on evaluation of signific ance.
Archaeological documentation may be undertaken as an aid to various treatment activities, including research, int erpretation, reconstruction, stabilization, and d ata recovery when m itigating arch aeological losses resulting from construction. Care sho uld be taken to assure that documentation efforts do not duplicate previous efforts.5
A research design is created to guide investigation of unanticipated archaeologic al materials discov ered during construction activities . A research design is a set of instructions or strategies for archaeologic al p roblem-solving and procedures for avoiding or excavating materials
• A s tatement that all cultural resources recovered will be prepared in acco rdance with the requirements of an identified qualified curatorial fa cility. Storage facilities in Los Angeles County and surrounding areas include California State University , Bakersfield; F owler Museum of Cultural History, University o f California, Los Angeles; Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County; and University of California Archaeological Research Unit, Riverside
• Protocols to follow if cultural resources and/or hu man remains a re discovered, including calling the County Coroner
1.4 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
This regulatory framework, or the laws which protect cultural resources, identifies the federal, state, and local s tatutes, ordinances, or pol icies that go vern the conservation and protection of cultural resources. These are laws that the City must comply with for all construction -related, landscaping, and maintenance acti vities that occur within its facilities . If broken, these laws are punisha ble by fines and/or jail time. Although the C ity works to ensu re these laws are c omplied with, the staff who break these laws will pay the fines and/or serve the jail time; not the City.
1.4.1 Federal
National Historic Preservation Act
The National His toric Preserv ation Act (NHPA) (Public Law 89 -665; 16 U.S.C. 47 0 et seq.) is legislation intended to preserve historical and archaeological sites in t he United States of America.
The act crea ted the NRHP, the list of Nationa l His toric Landmarks, and the Sta te Historic Preservation Offices.
Evaluation of a Property’s Significance
To b e listed in the NRHP, a property must not only be shown to be signifi cant u nder NRHP criteria, but it also mus t have integrity. The evaluation of in tegrity is sometimes a subje ctive judgment, but it must always be grounded in an understanding of a property’s physical features and
5 “Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Archeolo gical Documentation.” National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Available at: https://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/arch_stnds_7.htm ATTACHMENT 2
A2-311
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
how they relate to its significance.6 The quality of significance is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity and:
A. are associated with events that have made a signifi cant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or
B. are associated with the lives of significant persons in our past; or C. embody the distinctive characteri stics of a type, period, or metho d of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or
D. have yielded o r may be likely to yield, informa tion importan t in history or prehistory.7
Evaluation of a Property’s Integrity
Historic properties either retain integrity (that is, convey their s ignificance) or they do not. Within the c oncept of integrity, the NRHP cri teria recognize seven aspects or qualities tha t, in various combinations, define integrity:8
Location: Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred.
Design: Design is the combination of elements that create the form, pl an, space, st ructure, and style of a property.
Setting: Setting is the physical environment of a historic property.
Materials: Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property.
Workmanship: Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory.
Feeling: Feeling is a property’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time.
Association: Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person an d a historic property.
6 “How to Evalu ate the Integrity of a Property.” National Park Service, U.S . Department of the Interior. Available at:
http://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb15/nrb15_8.htm#seven aspects 7 “How to Apply the National Crit eria for Evaluation.” National Park Servi ce, U.S. Department of the Interior.
Available at: http://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb15/nrb15_2.htm 8 “How to Ev aluate the Integrity of a Property.” National Park S ervice, U.S. Department of the Inter ior. Available at:
http://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb15/nrb15_8.htm#seven aspects ATTACHMENT 2
A2-312
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
To retain histori c integrity, a property will always possess several, and usually m ost, of the se aspects. The retention of specific aspects of in tegrity is paramou nt for a property to convey its significance. Determining which of th ese aspects are most important to a parti cular property requires knowing why, where, and when the property is significant.9
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990
The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA) sets provisions for the intentional removal and inadvertent discovery of human remains and other cultural items from federal and Tribal lands. It clarifies the ownership of huma n remains and sets forth a process for repatriation of human remains and associated funerary objects and sacre d religious objects to the Native American groups claiming to be l ineal descendants or culturally affiliated with the remains or objects. It requires any federally funded institution housing Native American remains or artifacts to compile an inventory of all cultural items within the museum or with its agency and to provide a summary to any Native American tribe claiming affiliation.
1.4.2 State
California Environmental Quality Act10
Pursuant to CEQA, a historical resource is a resource listed in, or elig ible for listing in, the CRHR.
In addition, resources included in a local register of historic resources or identified as signif icant in a local s urvey conducted in accordance with state guidelines are also consider ed historical resources under CEQA, unles s a preponderance of the facts demo nstrates otherwise. According t o CEQA, the f act that a resource is not listed in or determine d eligible for lis ting in the CRHR or is not included in a local register or survey sha ll not preclude a Lead Agency, as defined by CEQA, from determining that the resource may be a historical r esource as de fined in California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5024.1.11
Historical resources (buildings, structures, or archaeological resourc es) are considered part of the environment and are subject to review under C EQA. A proposed project that ma y cause a substantial adverse effect on the significance of a historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment.
CEQA applies to archaeological resource s when (1) the archaeological reso urce satisfies the definition of a historical resource or (2) the archaeological resource sati sfies the definiti on of a “unique archaeological resource.” A unique archaeological res ource is an archaeological artifact, object, or site that has a high probability of meeting any of the following criteria:12
1. The archaeological resource contains info rmation needed to answer important scientific research questions and there is a demonst rable p ublic interest in that information.
9 “How to Evaluate the Integrity of a Property.” National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Available at:
http://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb15/nrb15_8.htm#seven aspects 10 California Public Resources Code, Division 13, Sections 21083.2, 21084.1. 11 California Code o f Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3 . Amended 6 October 2005. Guidelines for the Impleme ntation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15064.5(a). 12 California Public Resources Code, Division 13, Section 21083.2(g).
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-313
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
2. The archaeological resource has a special and particular qua lity such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type.
3. The archaeological resource is directly associated with a sc ientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person.
California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050 and Sections 18950 through 18961
Consistent with the provision s of Section 50907.9 of the PRC, Section 7050 of the Health and Safety C ode (HSC) authorizes the NAHC to regul ate Native American concerns regar ding the excavation and disposit ion of Native American cultural resources. Among its duties, t he Commission is a uthorized to resolve disputes relating to the treatment and dispositi on of Native American human remains and i tems associated with burials. Upon notification of the discovery o f human remai ns by a county coroner, the Commission notifies t he Native American group or individual most likely descended from the deceased.
The St ate Historic Building Code (HSC ) Sections 18950–18961 provide alternative b uilding regulations and building standards for the rehabilitation, preservation, restoration (including related reconstruction), or relocation of buildings or structures designated as historic buildings. Such alternative building standards and building reg ulations are intended to facilit ate the resto ration or change of occupancy so as to preserve t heir original or r estored architectural elements and features, to encourage energy cons ervation and a cost -effective approach to preservation, and to provide for the safety of the building occupants.
California Penal Code Section 622 – Destruction of Historical Properties
This section of the California Penal Code makes it a misdemeanor for anyone (except the owner) to willfully injure or destroy anything of arch aeological interest or value whe ther on private lands or within any public park or place. In a ddition, Penal Cod e Section 622.5 sets the penalties for the damage or removal of cultural resources.
Senate Bill 18 – Traditional Tribal Cultural Places
Senate Bill (SB) 18, enacted in 2004, requires local governments to consult with Native American groups at the earlies t point in the local government land use planning process. The consul tation intends to establish a meaningful dialogue regarding potential means to preserve Native American places of prehis toric, archaeological, cultural, spiritual, and c eremonial importance. It allows for tribes to hold conservation easements and for Tribal cultural places to be included in open space planning.
Assembly Bill (AB) 52
AB 52 is a California Assembly Bill pa ssed into law in September of 2014. AB 52 creates a new category of environmental resources that must be considered under CEQA: “ Tribal c ultural resources,” which is defined belo w. AB 52 is applicable to projects where a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report is determined to be the appropriate environmental document to support the County Board of Supervisors decision-making process related to a proposed project.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-314
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
AB 52 adds Tribal cultural resource s to the cate gories of cultural resources in CEQA, which had formerly been limit ed to historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources. “Tribal cultural resources” are defined as eithe r (1) ”sites, features, places , cultural landscapes, sacred place s and objects with cultural value to a California Native Amer ican tribe” that ar e included in the State register of historical resources or a local register of historical resources, or that are determined to be eligible for i nclusion in the State register; or (2) resou rces determined by the lead agency, in its discretion, to be significant based on the criteria for listing in the State register.
Recognizing that tribes may have expertise with regard to their Tribal history and practices, AB 52 requires lead agencies to provide notice to tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed project if they have requested notice of projects proposed within that area. If the tribe requests consultation within 30 days up on receipt of the notice, the lead agency must consult with the tribe. Consultation may include discussing the type of environmental review necessary, the si gnificance of Tribal cultural reso urces, the significance of the pro ject’s impacts on the Tribal cultural resources, and alternatives and mitigation measures re commended by the tribe.
The parties must consult in good faith, and consultation is deem ed concluded when either the parties agree to measures to mitigate or avoid a significant effect on a Tribal cultural resource (if such a significant effect exists) or when a party concl udes that mutual agreement cannot be reached.
Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines provides a set of sample quest ions that guide the evaluation of potential impacts with regard to cultural resources.
Would the project:
(a) Cause a subst antial adverse chan ge in the significance of an historical resource as defined in §15064.5?
(b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource as defined in §15064.5?
(c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleo ntological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
(d) Disturb any human remains, i ncluding those interred outside of formal cemeteries?13
(e) Directly or indirectly cause a substantial adverse effect to a Tribal Cultural Resource pursuant to AB 52?
California Register of Historical Resources
Created in 1992 and implemented in 1998, the CRHR is “an authoritative guide in California to be used by state and loca l ag encies, private groups, and citizens to identify the state’s historical resources and to indicate what prop erties are to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible,
13 California Code of Regul ations, Title 14, Chapter 3. Amend ed 6 October 2005. Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-315
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
from s ubstantial adverse change.” 14 Certain prop erties, including those listed in or f ormally determined eligible for listing in the NRHP and recently designated California Historical Landmarks (CHLs) are automatically included in the CRHR. Other properties recog nized under the California Points of Hist orical Interest program, identifie d as significant in historic re sources surve ys, or designated by local landmarks programs may be nominated for inclusion in the CRHR. A resource, either an individual property or a contributor to a historic district, may b e listed in the CRHR if the State Historical Resources Commission determines t hat it meets one or more of the following criteria, which are modeled on NRHP criteria:15
Criterion 1: It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to t he broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage.
Criterion 2: It is associated with the lives of persons important in our past.
Criterion 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, p eriod, region, or method of construction; represents the work of an importa nt c reative individual; or possesses high artistic values.
Criterion 4: It has yielded, or may be likely to yi eld, information important in history or prehistory.
Resources nominated to the CRHR must retain enough of the ir historic character or appearanc e (integrity) to be recognizabl e as historic resources and to convey the reasons for their significance.16 It is possible that a resource whose integrity does not satisfy NRHP criter ia may still be eligible for listing in the CRHR. A resource that has lost its historic character or appearance may still have sufficient integrity for the CRHR if, un der Criterion 4, it maintains the potential to yield significant scientific or historical information or specific data. Resources that have achieved significance within the past 50 years also may be eligible for inclusion in the CRHR, provided that enough time has lapsed to obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resource.17
14 California Public Resources Code, Section 5024.1(a). 15 California Public Resources Code, Section 5024.1(c). 16 California Office of Historic P reservation. n.d. “Technical Assistance Bulletin 6: California Register and National Register, A Comparison ( for Purposes of Dete rmining Eligibility for the California Register).” Available online at:
http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/1069/files/technical%20assistance%20bulletin%206%202011%20update.pdf 17 California Office of Historic Preservatio n. n.d. “Technical As sistance Bulletin 6: California Register and National Register, A Comparison (fo r Purposes of Determining Eligibi lity for the California Register). ” Available online at:
http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/1069/files/technical%20assistance%20bulletin%206%202011%20update.pdf ATTACHMENT 2
A2-316
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
California Historical Landmarks Registration Program18
CHLs are buildings, structure s, sites, or places that have anthropological, cultural, mil itary, political, ar chitectural, economic, scientific or technical, religious, experimenta l, or other value and that have been dete rmined to have statewide historical significance by meeting at le ast one of the criteria listed below. The resource must also be approved for designation by the County Board of Supervisors (or the City or Town Counc il in whose jurisdiction it is located), be recommended by the State Histo rical Resources Commission, and be officially designated by the Director of California State Parks.
To be eligible for designation as a CHL, a resource must meet at least one of the following criteria:
• The first, last, o nly, or most significant of its t ype i n the state or within a lar ge geographic region (Northern, Central, or Southern California)
• Associated with an individual or group having a profound influence on the history of California
• A prototype of, or an outsta nding example of, a period, style , arc hitectural movement or cons truction or o ne of the more notable works or the best surviv ing work in a region of a pioneer architect, designer, or master builder
California Points of Historical Interest19
California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI) are sites, buildings, features, or events that are of local (city or county) significance a nd have anthropologi cal, cultural, military, political, architectural, economic, scientifi c o r t echnical, religious, experimental, or other value. Points of Histori cal Interest designated after De cember 1997 a nd recommended by the State Historical Resource s Commission are als o listed in the CRHR. No historic resource may be designated as both a Landmark and a Point. If a Point is later granted status as a Landmark, the Point designation will be retired. In practice, the Point designation program is most often used in localities that do not have a locally enacted cultural heritage or preservation ordinance.
To be eligible for designati on as a Point of Historical Inter est, a resource must meet at lea st one of the following criteria:
• The first, last, only, or most significant of its type within the local geographic region (city or county)
• Associated with an individual or group having a profound influence on the history of the local area
• A prototype of, or an out standing example of, a period, style, architect ural movement or con struction or one of the more notable works or the best surviving work in the local region of a pioneer architect, designer, or master builder.
18 “California Historical Landmarks Registrat ion.” California Offic e of Historic Preservation. Available online at:
http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=21747
19 “California Points of Histor ical Interest: Registration Programs.” California Office of Historic Preservation. Available at: http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=21750
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-317
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
Public Resources Code (PRC) Sections 5097.9–5097.991
Section 5097.91 of the PRC established the NAHC, whose duties include the inventory of places of religious or social significanc e t o Native Americans and the identificat ion of known graves and cemeteries of Native Americans on private lands. Under Section 5097.9 of the PRC, a state policy of noninterference with the free expression or exercise of Native American religion was articu lated along with a prohibition of severe or irreparable damage to Native American sanctified cemeteries, places of wors hip, religious or ceremonial sites, or sacred sh rines located on pu blic property.
Section 5097.98 of the PRC specifies a protocol to be f ollowed w hen the NAHC receives notification of a discovery of Native Amer ican h uman remains from a County Coroner. Sect ion 5097.5 states that it is a misdemeanor to knowingly and willfully excavate, disturb, destroy, deface, or remove any historic or prehi storic ru ins, burial grounds, archaeologi cal or vertebrate paleontological site s, on public lands, except with the expr ess permission of the public agency holding jurisdiction over the lands.
California Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 2001
Codified in the California H ealth and Safety Code Sections 8 010–8030, the California Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (Cal NAGPRA) is the California equivalent of the federal NAGPRA. Intended to “provide a seamless and co nsistent state policy to ensure that all California Indian human remains and cu ltural items be treated wit h dignity and respect,” Cal NAGPRA also encourages and provid es a mechanism for the return of remains and cultural items to lineal descendants. Sectio n 8025 established a Repatriation Oversig ht Commission to oversee this process. The Act also provides a process for non–federally recognized tribes to file claims with agencies and museums for repatriation of human remains and cultural items.
Health and Safety Code, Sections 7050 and 7052
Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 declares that, in the event of t he discovery of human remains outside a dedicated cemetery, a ll ground disturbance must cease and the County Coroner must be notified. Section 7052 establishes a felony penalty for mutilating, disinterring, or otherwise disturbing human remains, except by relatives.
Penal Code, Section 622.5
Penal Code Section 622 .5 provides misdeme anor penalties for injuring or destroying objects of historic or archa eological interest located on public or p rivate lands but specifically ex cludes the landowner.
1.4.3 Local
City of Burbank
The Burbank Cultural Heritage Ordinance, adopted by the Ci ty Council in 1994 as Ordinance 3381, establishes ten criteria for designating a property as an Historic Place or Structure of Merit.
These criteria are patterned generally along the lines of the NRHP, but depart from them substantially in wording, terminology and detail. A property may be eligible for designation if:
a. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city’s cultural, social, economic, civic, aesthetic, engineering, architectural, or natural history ATTACHMENT 2
A2-318
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
b. It is identified with persons or events significant in local, regional, state, or national history
c. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, design ideology, or method of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship;
d. It is representative of the work of a notable builder, designer, or architect; e. It contributes to the significance of an historic area, being a geographically definable areas possessing a concentration of not less than fifty percent (50%) of historic or scenic properties which contribute to each other and are unified aesthetically by plan of physical development;
f. It has a unique location or singular physical characteristic(s) or is a view or vista representing an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, community, or the city of Burbank;
g. It embodies elements of architectural design, detail materials or craftsmanship that represent a significant structural or architectural achievement or innovation; h. It is similar to other distinctive properties, sites, areas, or objects based on historic, cultural, or architectural motif;
i. It reflects significant geographical patterns, including those associated with different eras of settlement and growth, particular transportation modes, or distinctive examples of park or community planning;
j. It is one of the few remaining examples in the city, state, region, or nation possessing distinguishing characteristics of an architectural or historical type or specimen.20
20 City of Burbank. November 1999. “Regulatory Setting for Historic Resources Management” in “City of Burbank Historic Preservation Plan.” Prepared by: San Buenaventura Research Associates, Santa Paula, CA. Available at:
https://www.burbankca.gov/documents/173607/0/HistoricPreservationPlan.pdf/874e1979-a0b6-abac-88d2- c8aeb036ae9d?t=1612304426623
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-319
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
CHAPTER 2.0
SETTING
This section of the Resource Protection Plan provides an overview of the cultural setting of the city of Burbank and the BWP Campus. The cultural setting provides a summary of the prehistoric Native American context, Native American cultural context, and historic context. A context is the specific background—events, development, social institutions, and physical setting—that a resource originated from. Understanding information provided in contexts helps to explain and define th e significance of those resources. The first group of Spanish explorers arrived in California in 1 542, which is considered the year that marks the end of the prehistoric period and the beginning of the historic period
The information presented in this Resource Protection Plan was developed through a compilation of archival records and research that was conducted in 2022 in support of the preparation of historic resource assessments of the BWP Campus and surrounding area . In general, the archival and record searches includ ed review of reports documenting surveys and investigation of archaeological and historical resources, on file with the SCCIC; information available through the City Public Library; maps including recent and historic topographic and Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps; historic photographs, news clippings, environmental reports; as-built drawings; board letters and other data ; online data sources; and site investigations conducted in 2022 as part the preparation of the historic resource assessments.
Archaeological resources identified during previous studies include those identified as P-19- 002530 and P-19-003348, located within the proposed Project site. P-19-002530 is a historic site, a depot building dating to 1929. The site was recorded as destroyed in a 2012 Technical Background Report conducted as a part of the Burbank 2035 General Plan .1 P-19-003348 consists of a scatter of historic domestic and industrial debris da ting from the 1890s to the present. P- 190003348 was reported as being in poor condition in its initial documentation. Other archaeological resources within a 0.25-mile radius but outside of the proposed Project area include Union Pacific Rail Road Spurs, h istoric U.S. Post Offices, and a historic commercial building. No prehistoric resources have been previously identified within the 0.25-mile search radius.
The BWP Campus and BWC may be considered a historic built resource, as both are greater tha n 50 years of age. However, the proposed Project has been determined to not alter any of the qualities that convey the historical significance of the resource s, and therefore will have no impact to the historic built environment.
1 City of Burbank. 2013. Burbank2035 General Plan. Adopted February 19, 2013. Accessed November 1, 2022.
Available at: https://www.burbankca.gov/documents/173607/0/The+Burbank2035+General+Plan.pdf/1396 56b0- 80e9-3b11-dc6d-751642c85b38?version=1.2&t=1616616954424&imagePreview=1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-320
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
2.1 CULTURAL SETTING
2.1.1 Prehistoric Context
Regional Prehistoric Period
The prehistoric context describes interpretations of how people lived based upon the archaeological record from the earliest discovered sites to the mid -1700s when the Spanish arrived in California. The proposed Project area falls within the area of two pr ehistoric cultural timelines proposed by researchers: the California coastal timeline and the Mojave Desert timeline. The geographical boundaries of both timelines are not clearly understood. The approximate eastern limit of the California coastal chronology in this area is the Sierra Pelona Ridge near Palmdale and the western limit of the Mojave Desert chronology in this area is the Antelope Valley. For this reason, both the coastal and desert timelines are presented below. Future work may provide support for a more precise timeline of this area.
California Coastal Timeline
Several prehistoric cultural timelines have been proposed for the coastal Southern California region with three of the most frequently cited timelines developed by William Wallace,2 Claude Warren,3 and Chester King. 4 The timelines provide a framework to discuss archaeological information in relation to broad cultural changes seen in the archaeological record. The timeline sequence presented here represents an updated summary compiled by Glassow and others5 for the “Northern California Bight,” or California coastline.6 This geographic area consists of the coastal area from Vandenberg Air Force Base south to Palos Verdes, as well as the Channel Islands and adjacent inland areas, including the San Fernando Valley and Los Angeles Basin. 7 The prehistoric timeline sequence of the Northern California Bight can be divided into four broad categories related to specific time periods (Table 2.1.1-1, Southern California Coastal Regional Chronology ). It should be noted that the prehistoric timeline for the region is constantly being refined, with new discoveries and improvements in the accuracy of dating techniques.
2 Wallace, William J. 1955. “A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 11: 214–230.
3 Warren, Claude M. 1968. “Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast.” In Archaic Prehistory in the Western United States, ed. Cynthia Irwin-Williams. Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology No. 1. Portales, NM: Eastern New Mexico University. 4 King, Chester. 1990. Evolution of Chumash Society: A Comparative Study of Artifacts Used for Social System Maintenance in the Santa Barbara Channel Region before AD 1804. New York, NY: Garland. 5 Glassow, Michael A., Lynn H. Gamble, Jennifer E. Perry, and Glenn S. Russell. 2007. “Prehistory of the Northern California Bight and the Adjacent Transverse Ranges.” In California Prehistory, Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, ed. Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar. New York, NY: Altamira. 6 The Northern California Bight is the area including the curved coastline and Channel Islands. 7 Glassow, Michael A., Lynn H. Gamble, Jennifer E. Perry, and Glenn S. Russell. 2007. “Prehistory of the Northern California Bight and the Adjacent Transverse Ranges.” In California Prehistory, Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, ed. Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar. New York, NY: Altamira.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-321
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
TABLE 2.1.1-1
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL REGIONAL CHRONOLOGY
Epoch Coastal Region Dates
Terminal Pleistocene / Early Holocene Paleo-Coastal Period Circa 9500 to 7000/6500 BP Middle Holocene Millingstone Period Circa 7000/6500 to 1500/1000 BP Late Holocene Intermediate Period 1500/1000 BP to AD 750 Late Holocene Late Period AD 750 to Spanish contact
Terminal Pleistocene and Early Holocene: Paleo-Coastal Period (Circa 9500 to 7000/6500 BP)
Although information on early human occupation for the Southern California coast is limited, archaeological evidence from the northern Channel Islands suggests initial settlement within the region occurred at least 12,000 years before present (BP). “Before present” is defined as 1950 AD because that is the year that radio carbon dating wa s discovered. At Daisy Cave (Site No. CA-SMI- 261) on San Miguel Island in the Channel Islands, radiocarbon dates indicate an early period of use at the end of the Pleistocene epoch, sometime between 9600 and 9000 BP.8 Evidence of early human occupation in the Northern California Bight has also been found on nearby Santa Rosa Island, where human remains from the Arlington Springs Site ( Site No. CA-SRI-1730) have been dated between 11000 and 10000 BP.9
Archaeological information recovered from these and other coastal Paleoindian sites indicate a clear maritime cultural adaptation, termed the “Paleo -Coastal Tradition,”10 which involved the use of seafaring technology and a subsistence strategy focused on shellfish gathering and fishing. 11 Paleoindians are considered to be the first peoples who entered and inhabited the Americas.
Relatively few sites have been identified in Los Angeles County that date to the end of the Pleistocene and early Holocene epochs. Currently, the earliest reliable date for human occupation in the area derives from the La Brea Tar Pits ( Site No. CA-LAN-159), where human bone has been dated to 8520 BP.12 Evidence of possible early human occupation has also been found at the sand dune bluff site of Malaga Cove (Site No. CA-LAN-138), located between Redondo Beach and Palos Verdes.13 Researchers have proposed that archaeological remains recovered from the deepest cultural layer at the site, which include shell, animal bone, and chipped stone tools, may date as early as 8000 BP.14,15
8 Erlandson, J.M., D.J. Kennett, B.L. Ingram, D.A. Guthrie, D.P. Morris, M.A. Tveshov, G.J. West, and P.L. Walker 1996. “An Archaeological and Paleontological Chronology for Daisy Cave (CA-SMI-261), San Miguel Island, California.” Radiocarbon, 38: 355–373.
9 Johnson, J.R., T.W. Stafford Jr., H.O. Ajie, and D.P. Morris. 2002. “Arlington Springs Revisited.” In Proceedings of the Fifth California Islands Symposium, ed. D. Browne, K. Mitchell, and H. Chaney, pp. 541–45. Santa Barbara, CA:
USDI Minerals Management Service and The Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. 10 Moratto, M.J. 1984. California Archaeology. New York, NY: Academic Press. pp. 103–113 11 Rick, T.C., J.M. Erlandson, and R.L. Vellanoweth. 2001. “Paleocoastal Fishing along the Pacific Coast of the Americas: Evidence from Daisy Cave, San Miguel Island, California.” American Antiquity, 66: 595–614. 12 Berger, R., R. Protsch, R. Reynolds, C. Rozaire, and J.R. Sackett. 1971. New Radiocarbon Dates Based on Bone Collagen of California Indians. Los Angeles, CA: Contributions to the University of California Archaeological Survey. 13 Walker, Edwin Francis. 1951. Five Prehistoric Archaeological Sites in Los Angeles County, California. F.W. Hodge Anniversary Publication Fund VI. Los Angeles, CA: Southwest Museum. 14 Moratto, M.J. 1984. California Archaeology. New York, NY: Academic Press. p. 132.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-322
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
Middle Holocene: Millingstone Period (Circa 9000/8500 to 3500/2000 BP)
The Millingstone, or Horizon, Period also referred to as the “Encinitas Tradition,” 16,17 is the earliest well-established, through information analysis , cultural occupation of the coastal areas of the region. The onset of this period, which began sometime between 7000 and 6500 BP, is marked by the expansion of populations throughout the Northern California Bight. Regional variations in technology, settlement patterns, and burial practices among Millingstone sites have led researchers to define several local “patterns” of the tradition.18
Groups that occupied the San Fernando Valley are thought to have been relatively small and highly mobile during this t ime, with a general subsistence economy focused on the gathering of shellfish and plant foods, particularly hard seeds, with hunting being of less importance.19
Two time period subdivisions have been defined for the port ion of the “Topanga Pattern” falling within the Millingstone Period: Topanga I (circa 8500 to 5000 BP) and Topanga II (circa 5000 to 3000 BP).20 Topanga I collections are characterized by abundan t manos , or stone grinding tool, and metates, or stone tool similar to a mortar, core tools and scrapers, charmstones associated with religions, stones shaped like cogs or “cogged stone,” and game stones or “ discoidals;” projectile points, commonly known as arrowheads, are quite rare with those found resembling earlier, large, leaf-shaped forms.21 Secondary inhumations22 with associated cairns, or rock mounds, are the most common burial form at Millingstone sites with small numbers of extended inhumations (a burial where the body is laid stretched out on its back) also identified. The subsequent Topanga II phase largely represents a continuation of the Topanga pattern with site collections characterized by numerous manos and metates, charmstones, cogged stones, discoidals , and some stone balls. A significant technological change in ground stone occurs at this time with the appearance of mortars and pestles (Figure 2.1.1-1, Ground Stone Mortar Fragment; Figure 2.1.1-2, Ground Stone Pestle).
At Top anga II sites where mortars and pestles were found indicate eating acorns by coastal populations had begun.23 The quantity of projectile points also notably increases in Topanga II site
15 Wallace, W.J. 1986. “Archaeological Research at Malaga Cove.” In Symposium: A New Look at Some Old Sites, ed.
G.S. Breschini and T. Haversat. Salinas, CA: Coyote Press. 16 Sutton, Mark Q. 2010. “The Del Rey Tradition and Its Place in the Prehistory of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 44(2): 1–54.
17 Sutton, Mark Q., and Jill K. Gardner. 2010. “Reconceptualizing the Encinitas Tradition of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 42(4): 1–64. 18 Sutton, Mark Q., and Jill K. Gardner. 2010. “Reconceptualizing the Encinitas Tradition of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 42(4): 1–64. 19 Glassow, Michael A., Lynn H. Gamble, Jennifer E. Perry, and Glenn S. Russell. 2007. “Prehistory of the Northern California Bight and the Adjacent Transverse Ranges.” In California Prehistory, Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, ed. Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar. New York, NY: Altamira. 20 Sutton, Mark Q., and Jill K. Gardner. 2010. “Reconceptualizing the Encinitas Tradition of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 42(4): 1–64, 8. 21 Glassow, Michael A., Lynn H. Gamble, Jennifer E. Perry, and Glenn S. Russell. 2007. “Prehistory of the Northern California Bight and the Adjacent Transverse Ranges.” In California Prehistory, Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, ed. Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar. New York, NY: Altamira. 22 Inhumation is defined as burial in the ground by hollowing out a trench in the earth for the body or covering it with rocks or dirt. Secondary inhumation is the practice of removing the remains of a corpse to another grave or ossuary which were initially buried or put elsewhere.
23 Sutton, Mark Q., and Jill K. Gardner. 2010. “Reconceptualizing the Encinitas Tradition of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 42(4): 1–64, 41.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-323
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
deposits indicating that the large game hunting may have played a greater role in the subsistence economy than in earlier times. While secondary burials continue to be quite common, a few flexed inhumations (a burial where the body is bent into a fetal position ) have also been recovered from archaeological sites dating to the Topanga II time period.
Figure 2.1.1-1. Ground Stone Mortar Fragment
SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2011
Figure 2.1.1-2. Ground Stone Pestle
SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2011
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-324
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
A number of Millingstone sites have been identified in the San Fernando Valley and surrounding areas. The early component of the Tank site ( no. CA-LAN-1), located in the Santa Monica Mountains, appears to date to the Topanga I phase. 24 In addition, a marine shell from the Encino Village site ( no. CA-LAN-43 / CA -LAN-111) produced a radiocarbon date of approximately 4,570 BP, suggesting use of the southern portion of the valley during the Topanga I phase.25 The presence of mortars and pestles alongside stemmed projectile points at the Chatsworth site (no. CA-LAN-21), located at the western edge of the San Fernando Valley suggests a Topanga II occupation.26 Finally, the Big Tujunga Wash site, located at the e astern edge of the San Fernando Valley, may have also contained Topanga II archaeological resources.27
Late Holocene: Intermediate Period (3500/3000 BP to 1250 BP)
The Intermediate Period, which includes the early portion of the “Del Rey Tradition” defined by Sutton,28 begins around 3500 BP. At this time, significant changes are seen throughout the coastal areas of Southern California in material culture, settlement systems, subsistence strategies, and mortuary practices. These new cultura l traits have been attributed to the arrival of Takic language speaking people from the southern San Joaquin Valley. 29 Biological, archaeological, and linguistic data indicate that the Takic groups who settled in the San Fernando Valley were ethnically dis tinct from the Hokan -speaking Topanga populations and are believed to be to the ancestors of the ethnographic Gabrielino tribal groups.30 While archaeological evidence indicates that “relic” Topanga III populations continued to survive in isolation in the Santa Monica Mountains, these indigenous groups appear to have been largely replaced or absorbed by the Gabrielino or Chumash tribes by 2000 BP.31
Intermediate Period sites within Los Angeles County are represented by the “Angeles Pattern” of the Del Rey Tradition.32 Three time period subdivisions have been defined for the portion of the Angeles Pattern that falls within the Intermediate Period: Angeles I ( 3500 to 2600 BP), Angeles II (2600 BP to 1600 BP), and Angeles III ( 1600 to 1250 BP).33 The onset of the Angeles I phase is
24 Sutton, Mark Q., and Jill K. Gardner. 2010. “Reconceptualizing the Encinitas Tradition of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 42(4): 1–64, 8. 25 Taylor, R.E., P.J. Ennis, P.J. Slota Jr. and L.A. Payen. 1989. “Non-Age-Related Variations in Aspartic Acid Racemization in Bone from a Radiocarbon-dated Late Holocene Archaeological Site.” Radiocarbon, 31(3): 1048-56. 26 Sutton, Mark Q., and Jill K. Gardner. 2010. “Reconceptualizing the Encinitas Tradition of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 42(4): 1–64, 8. 27 Sutton, Mark Q., and Jill K. Gardner. 2010. “Reconceptualizing the Encinitas Tradition of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 42(4): 1–64, 8. 28 Sutton, Mark Q. 2010. “The Del Rey Tradition and Its Place in the Prehistory of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 44(2): 1–54.
29 Sutton, Mark Q. 2009. “People and Language: Defining the Takic Expansion in Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 41(2&3): 31-93.
30 Sutton, Mark Q. 2009. “People and Language: Defining the Takic Expansion in Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 41(2&3): 31-93.
31 Sutton, Mark Q., and Jill K. Gardner. 2010. “Reconceptualizing the Encinitas Tradition of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 42(4): 1–64, 17. 32 Sutton, Mark Q. 2010. “The Del Rey Tradition and Its Place in the Prehistory of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 44(2): 1–54.
33 Sutton, Mark Q., and Jill K. Gardner. 2010. “Reconceptualizing the Encinitas Tradition of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 42(4): 1–64, 8.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-325
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
characterized by the increase and concentration of regional populations and the appearance of the first village settlements. The prevalence of projectile points, single -piece shell fishhooks, and bone harpoon points at Angeles I sites suggests a shift in the Intermediate Period with an increased emphasis on fishing and terrestrial hunting and less reliance on the gathering of shellfish resources.
Regional trade also appeared to develop at this time with coastal populatio ns in Los Angeles County obtaining small steatite (soapstone) artifacts and Olivella shell beads from the southern Channel Islands and obsidian rock from the Coso Volcanic Field. 34 Finally, changes are seen in mortuary practices during the Angeles I phase with flexed (fetal position) primary35 inhumations (burials) and cremations replacing extended inhumations and cairns (commemorative rock piles).
The Angeles II phase largely represents a continuation and elaboration of the Angeles I technology, settlement, and subsistence systems. One exception to this pattern is the introduction of a new funerary36 complex around 260 0 BP consisting of large rock cairns or platforms which contain abundant broken tools, faunal remains (bones), and cremated human bone. These mortuary features have generally been thought to represent the predecessor of the Southern California Mourning Ceremony.37 Several important changes in the archaeological record mark the beginning of the Angeles III phase. At this time, larger seasonal villages characterized by well -developed middens (refuse heaps) and cemeteries were established along the coast or inland areas.
Archaeological information from Angeles III sites indicate s that residents of these settlements practiced a fairly diverse subsistence strategy which included the usage of both ocean and land animals.38
Notable technological changes occurred at this time with the introduction of the plank canoe and bow and arrow. 39 The appearance of new Olivella bead types at Angeles III sites indicates a reconfiguration of existing regional trade networks with increased interaction with populations in the Gulf of California. 40 Finally, cremations increase slightly in frequency at this time with inhumations (burials) no longer placed in an extended, or stretched out, position.41
34 Koerper, Henry C., Roger D. Mason, and Mark L. Peterson. 2002. “Complexity, Demography, and Change in Late Holocene Orange County.” In Catalysts to Complexity: Late Holocene Societies of the California Coast, ed. M.
Erlandson and Terry L. Jones. Perspectives in California Archaeology, Vol. 6. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles, Institute of Archaeology.
35 Primary inhumation is the initial burial of a deceased individual. 36 Funerary is defined as relating to a funeral or the commemoration of the dead. 37 Sutton, Mark Q. 2010. “The Del Rey Tradition and Its Place in the Prehistory of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 44(2): 1–54.
38 Sutton, Mark Q. 2010. “The Del Rey Tradition and Its Place in the Prehistory of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 44(2): 1–54.
39 Glassow, Michael A., Lynn H. Gamble, Jennifer E. Perry, and Glenn S. Russell. 2007. “Prehistory of the Northern California Bight and the Adjacent Transverse Ranges.” In California Prehistory, Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, ed. Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar. New York, NY: Altamira. 40 Koerper, Henry C., Roger D. Mason, and Mark L. Peterson. 2002. “Complexity, Demography, and Change in Late Holocene Orange County.” In Catalysts to Complexity: Late Holocene Societies of the California Coast, ed. M.
Erlandson and Terry L. Jones. Perspectives in California Archaeology, Vol. 6. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles, Institute of Archaeology.
41 Sutton, Mark Q. 2010. “The Del Rey Tradition and Its Place in the Prehistory of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 44(2): 1–54.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-326
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
Intermediate Period sites in Los Angeles County include Site N os. CA-LAN-2 and CA -LAN-197, both of which are located in the Santa Monica Mountains. The formal cemeteries at these sites reflect the increasingly stationary lifestyle that occurred during the Intermediate Period.42
Late Holocene: Late Period (1250 BP to Spanish Contact)
The Late Period dates from approximately 1250 BP until Spanish contact in 1542. Sutton 43 has divided this period, which falls within the larger Del Rey Tradition, into two phases: Angeles IV (AD 1250–800 BP) and Angeles V ( 800–450 BP). The Angeles IV phase is characterized by the continued growth of regional populations and the development of large stationary villages.
Although chiefdoms, or society rule based on family and led by senior members of that family, appear to have developed in the northern Channel Islands and Santa Barbara region after 8 50 BP,44,45 little direct evidence has been found to suggest this level of social complexity existed in the San Fernando Valley during the late prehistoric period.46
Several new types of material culture appear during the Angeles IV phase including Cottonwood tree various shaped points, bird-shaped stone and “spike” effigies or models, Olivella cupped or hollowed beads, and Mytilus shell disk or round beads. The presence of Southwestern artifacts from present -day Arizona , including Pataya-cultural ceramic figurines and Hohokam tribal shell bracelets, at Angeles IV sites suggests some interaction or trade between groups in Southern California and the So uthwest region of the United States . Notable changes are seen in regional exchange or trade networks after 800 BP with an increase in the number and size of steatite (soapstone) artifacts, including large vessels , such as a bowl , elaborate effigies or models , and comals (smooth flat griddle) , recovered from Angeles V sites. The presence of these artifacts suggests a strengthening of trade ties between coastal Los Angeles populations and the southern Channel Islands. 47 Finally, Late Period mortuary p ractices remain largely unchanged from the Intermediate Period with flexed (fetal position) primary inhumations (burials) continuing to be the preferred burial method.
Late Period sites in Los Angeles County include Sites Nos. CA-LAN-227 and CA -LAN-229, which are situated in the Santa Monica Mountains. Both sites contain less Millingstone period artifacts than earlier sites, but more mortars, pestles, projectile points (arrow heads), drills, beads, pipes,
42 Glassow, Michael A., Lynn H. Gamble, Jennifer E. Perry, and Glenn S. Russell. 2007. “Prehistory of the Northern California Bight and the Adjacent Transverse Ranges.” In California Prehistory, Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, ed. Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar. New York, NY: Altamira. 43 Sutton, Mark Q. 2010. “The Del Rey Tradition and Its Place in the Prehistory of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 44(2): 1–54.
44 Arnold, Jeanne E. 1992. “Complex Hunter-Gatherer-Fishers of Prehistoric California: Chiefs, Specialists, and Maritime Adaptations of the Channel Islands.” American Antiquity, 57(1): 60–84. 45 Gamble, Lynn H. 2005. “Culture and Climate: Reconsidering the Effect of Palaeoclimatic Variability among Southern California Hunter-Gatherer Societies.” World Archaeology, 37(1): 92–108. 46 Sutton, Mark Q. 2010. “The Del Rey Tradition and Its Place in the Prehistory of Southern California.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 44(2): 1–54.
47 Koerper, Henry C., Roger D. Mason, and Mark L. Peterson. 2002. “Complexity, Demography, and Change in Late Holocene Orange County.” In Catalysts to Complexity: Late Holocene Societies of the California Coast, ed. M.
Erlandson and Terry L. Jones. Perspectives in California Archaeology, Vol. 6. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles, Institute of Archaeology.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-327
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
and bone tools. 48 Although these sites represent a move toward centralized stationary villages during this period, it is unclear whether they represent year -round occupation or semi -permanent villages used as base settlements.49
2.1.2 Ethnographic Context
The BWP Campus is located within several cultural sphere s of influence of several Native American tribes. Traditional use of these areas likely varied over time but in cluded the Chumash, Gabrielino, and Tataviam tribal groups. Brief ethnographic reviews of each group are provided below.
The Gabrielino
At the time of Spanish contact, the Native American group subsequently known as the Gabrielino tribe occupied nearly the entire basin comprising the Counties of Los Angeles and Orange. Named after the Mission San Gabriel, the Gabrielino are thought to have been one of the two wealthiest and largest ethnic groups in native Southern California,50 the other being the Chumash. The wealth of the Gabrielino was largely due to the variety of natural resources within the land s they controlled, which included the rich coastal areas between Topanga Canyon and Aliso Creek, and the offshore islands of San Clemente, San Nicholas, and Santa Catalina . Inland Gabrielino territory included the watersheds of the Los Angeles, San Gabriel , and Santa Ana Rivers; was bounded on the north by the San Gabriel Mountains and on the south by the Santa Ana Mountains ; and extended to the east to the area of the current-day city of San Bernardino.51
Gabrielino language belonged to the Takic family of the Uto -Aztecan parent language and was comprised of four to six distinct dialects. 52,53 Ancestors of the ethnographically described Gabrielino are believed to have arrived in the Los Angeles Basin around 1500 BP, eventually establishing permanent settlements and displacing a pre -existing Hokan -speaking population. 54 Little is known of Gabriel ino social and political organization. Gabrielino communities were autonomous, comprised of several related nuclear families and led by a hereditary chiefdom. 55 Anthropologists Bean and Smith assert the tribe had at least three hierarchically ordered socia l classes among the Gabrielino: an elite class consisting of chiefs and their immediate families; an
48 Moratto, M. 1984. California Archaeology. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Inc. p. 141. 49 Glassow, Michael A., Lynn H. Gamble, Jennifer E. Perry, and Glenn S. Russell. 2007. “Prehistory of the Northern California Bight and the Adjacent Transverse Ranges.” In California Prehistory, Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, ed. Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar. New York, NY: Altamira. 50 Bean, L.J., and C.R. Smith. 1978. “Gabrielino.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F. Heizer.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. p. 538.
51 Bean, L.J., and C.R. Smith. 1978. “Gabrielino.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F. Heizer.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. p. 538.
52 Bean, L.J., and C.R. Smith. 1978. “Gabrielino.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F. Heizer.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. p. 538.
53 Kroeber, A. L. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 78. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. p. 620.
54 Bean, L.J., and C.R. Smith. 1978. “Gabrielino.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F. Heizer.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. p. 540.
55 Kroeber, A. L. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 78. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. p. 633.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-328
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
economically established, hereditary middle class; and a lower class of individuals engaged in ordinary socioeconomic pursuits. 56 Territorial boundaries we re marked and controlled both by individuals and by villages. 57,58 Many researchers assert that the Gabrielino cremated their dead until the Mission era, when the Spanish forced burial in cemeteries ,59,60 although pre -contact cemeteries with inhumations, or burials, have been excavated in the area.61
The Gabrielino practiced a hunter-gatherer subsistence lifestyle using large primary settlements and smaller, seasonal hunting and gathering camps. Hunting i nvolved both large and small game including deer, rabbit, squirrel, snake, and rat, as well as a wide variety of insects. Hunting on land was carried out with the bow and arrow, deadfall animal traps, snares, and traps. Deadfalls are a trap consisting of a heavy weight position ed to fall on an animal. Smoke and throwing clubs were used to hunt burrowing animals. Some meat taboos were held by the Gabrielino: bear, rattlesnake, stingray, and raven were not consumed because these animals w ere believed to be messengers of the god Chengiichngech.
An important part of seasonal gathering for inland Gabrielino groups was the establishment of shell-gathering camps along the coast north of San Pedro during winter months. 62 Additionally, marine mammals constituted an important part of the diet of coastal populations and were hunted with harpoons, spear-throwers, and clubs.63 Although fishing generally took place along rivers and from shore, open -water fishing between the mainland and the islands w as also practiced using boats made from wood planks and asphalt. Gabrielino fishing equipment also included fishhooks made of shell, nets, basketry traps, and poison substances obtained from plants.64
A wide variety of plant foods were consumed by the Gab rielino. Chief among these were acorns, which are rich in nutrients and have a high content of fiber and fat. Acorns were abundant in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains . Anthropologist Robinson describes a trail that ran up Millard Canyon, behind M t. Lowe to Red Box Saddle, and then down the West Fork of the San Gabriel River to Valley Forge Canyon, thereby providing prehistoric inhabitants of the Altadena area with important access to stands of oak. 65 Other plants consumed by the Gabrielino included the seeds of the islay ( Prunus ilicifolia), which were ground into a meal, and the seeds and shoots
56 Bean, L.J., and C.R. Smith. 1978. “Gabrielino.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F. Heizer.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. p. 543.
57 Bean, L.J., and C.R. Smith. 1978. “Gabrielino.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F. Heizer.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. p. 543.
58 McCawley, W. 1996. The First Angelinos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Banning, CA: Malki Museum Press. p. 25.
59 Reid, Hiram A. 1895. History of Pasadena. Pasadena, CA: Pasadena History Company. p. 31. 60 Kroeber, A. L. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 78. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. p. 633.
61 Walker, Edwin F. 1951. “A Cemetery at the Sheldon Reservoir Site in Pasadena.” In Five Prehistoric Archaeological Sites in Los Angeles County, California. Los Angeles, CA: Southwest Museum. pp. 70–80. 62 McCawley, W. 1996. The First Angelinos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Banning, CA: Malki Museum Press. p. 27.
63 McCawley, W. 1996. The First Angelinos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Banning, CA: Malki Museum Press. pp. 116–117, 121, 126.
64 Bean, L.J., and C.R. Smith. 1978. “Gabrielino.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F. Heizer.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. p. 546.
65 Robinson, John W. 1977. The San Gabriels. San Marino, CA: Golden West Books. pp. 13–14.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-329
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
of the chía (Salvia columbariae), which were eaten raw, made into loaves, or mixed with water to make a beverage. Roots and bulbs were included in the diet of mainland and island groups, along with clover, wild sunflower seeds, and cholla seeds. Wild tobacco was used for medicinal purposes and as a sedative and narcotic.66
The Gabrielinos engaged in trade amon g themselves and with other groups. Archaeological evidence suggests that Shoshonean 67 language speaking groups such as the Gabrielino inhabited San Nicolas Island by 8 ,500 years ago; by 5 ,000 years ago, the inhabitants of the island were involved in a trading network of symbolic items, such as religious figurines, and raw materials such as food or stones.68 On Santa Catalina Island a steatite (soapstone) “industry” developed. This rock is abundant on the island and was widely exported to mainland Gabrielin o groups as raw material for artistic or religious objects, as well as for functional objects such as bowls, mortars, pestles, comals (flat cooking griddles), and arrow shaft straighteners. 69 In exchange, the island inhabitants received acorns, different types of seeds, obsidian (volcanic rock) , and deerskin, both from mainland Gabrielino and from other inland groups, such as the Serrano. Coastal people exchanged shell and shell beads, dried fish, sea otter pelts, and salt.
Early Spanish accounts indicate that the Gabrielino lived in permanent villages with a population ranging from 50 to 200 individuals, and that in 1770 , the total Gabrielino population exceeded 5,000 people. 70,71 Several types of structu res characterized the Gabrielino villages: single-family homes took the form of domed circular structures averaging 12 to 35 feet in diameter and covered with tule, ferm, or carrizo plants, while communal structures measured over 60 feet in diameter and could house three or four families. Sweathouses, menstrual huts, and ceremonial enclosures were also common features of many villages.72,73
A relatively large and well -established village is believed to have been located on the Giddings Ranch near the mouth of Millard Canyon in the Altadena area of the San Gabriel Mountains, at the head of the acorn - and trade-trail extending up to the Mount Lowe area. The village was probably located, at least in part, in the area of the present-day La Vina Housing Development. During the time the Giddings Ranch was in operation in the late 1800s , artifacts were routinely plowed up from a foot or more below ground surface. 74 The depth artifacts were found at is important for planning excavation work in facilities known to have archaeological resource.
Other prehistoric villages in the area included sites at and above Sheep Corral Springs, located near
66 McCawley, W. 1996. The First Angelinos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Banning, CA: Malki Museum Press. pp. 128–131.
67 Shoshonean is a subfamily of the Uto-Aztecan language group. 68 Arnold, J.E., M.R. Walsh, and S.E. Hollimon. 2004. “The Archaeology of California.” Journal of Archaeological Research, 12(1): 1–73.
69 Bean, L.J., and C.R. Smith. 1978. “Gabrielino.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F. Heizer.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. pp. 542, 547.
70 Bean, L.J., and C.R. Smith. 1978. “Gabrielino.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F. Heizer.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. p. 540.
71 McCawley, William. 1996. The First Angelinos. Banning, CA: Malki Museum Press. p. 25. 72 Bean, L.J., and C.R. Smith. 1978. “Gabrielino.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F. Heizer.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. 542.
73 McCawley, William. 1996. The First Angelinos. Banning, CA: Malki Museum Press. p. 29. 74 Reid, Hiram A. 1895. History of Pasadena. Pasadena, CA: Pasadena History Company. p. 28.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-330
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
present-day Brookside Park, just south of the Rose Bowl in Pasadena . Ethnographic remnants identify a village and communal sweathouse at th is spring;75 and on Orange Grove Reservoir Hill, a high point just east of the spring between Arroyo Seco and the north end of Orange Grove Avenue. N umerous artifacts including groundstone, cogstones, and unworked chert (hard silica rock) were uncovered during excavations for a reservoir in the early 1870s. Many of these artifacts were discovered 4 or more feet below ground surface, leading Hiram Reid to suggest in 1895 that the Orange Grove Reservoir Hill site was a “stone age man” site dating to the Pleistocene era.76
Hahamog-na was a large Gabrielino site located on both sides of the Arroyo Seco, near Garfias Spring in Pasadena. It was here that the Spanish explorer Gaspar de Portola is said to have met the Gabrielino chief Hahamovic in January 1770.77,78 Hahamog-na was probably the first name used for the Pasadena and Altadena areas.79
Other documented Gabrielino villages in the area include Akuuronga, a village near a stone dam built to serve the Mission San Gabriel, in southeast Pasadena, that was in habited until at least the 1870s.80 Sonaanga was a village on Michael White’s (Miguel Blanco’s) farm, located about 0.25 mile west of Akuuronga,81 near the present-day San Marino High School. 82 Sheshiikwanonga was located near the Mission priests’ pear orchard, south of the Huntington residence in San Marino. 83 Sisit Canog-na was located below the mouth of Wilson, Mission , and San Marino Canyons.84 The village of Alyeupkigna was located on the grounds of Rancho Santa Anita near the city of Arcadia.
The Chumash
At the time of European contact, the Native Americans known as the Chumash occupied all of the Santa Barbara area and extended from Malibu to San Luis Obispo on the coast, and inland to the western area of the San Joaquin Valley. The California Channel Islands were also held by the Chumash, the most heavily occupied being Santa Cruz Island, Santa Rosa Island, and San Miguel Island.85 The Chumash of Santa Barbara spoke the “Barbareño” dialect of the Chumashan language family.86 They have been widely known as a coastal group, focusing their habits on maritime activities, much more than any other tribe in California. The Chumash are considered to have been one of the two wealthiest and largest ethnic groups in native Southern California, the other being
75 Reid, Hiram A. 1895. History of Pasadena. Pasadena, CA: Pasadena History Company. p. 26. 76 Reid, Hiram A. 1895. History of Pasadena. Pasadena, CA: Pasadena History Company. pp. 529–539. 77 Reid, Hiram A. 1895. History of Pasadena. Pasadena, CA: Pasadena History Company. p. 19. 78 Zack, Michele. 2004. Altadena: Between Wilderness and City. Altadena, CA: Altadena Historical Society. p. 8. 79 Reid, Hiram A. 1895. History of Pasadena. Pasadena, CA: Pasadena History Company. p. 20. 80 McCawley, William. 1996. The First Angelinos. Banning, CA: Malki Museum Press. p. 42. 81 McCawley, William. 1996. The First Angelinos. Banning, CA: Malki Museum Press. p. 43. 82 Johnston, Bernice E. 1962. California’s Gabrielino Indians. Los Angeles, CA: Southwest Museum. p. 165. 83 McCawley, William. 1996. The First Angelinos. Banning, CA: Malki Museum Press. p. 43. 84 Reid, Hiram A. 1895. History of Pasadena. Pasadena, CA: Pasadena History Company. p. 20. 85 Kroeber, A.L. 1976. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 78. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. (Reprint, New York, NY: Dover Publications.) 86 Henshaw, H.W. 1955. “California Indian Linguistic Records: The Mission Indian Vocabulary of H.W. Henshaw.” In University of California Anthropological Records 15:2. Ed R.F. Heizner. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-331
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
the Gabrielino. 87 This was largely due to the many natural resources within the land base they controlled, primarily the rich coastal section.
Archaeological information from the Santa Rosa and San Miguel Islands suggest that individuals were present in the area 13,000 years ago. Archaeological evidence to date on the mainland further reflects the development and expansion of Chumash culture over a span of 10,000 years. 88 The first European contact with the Chumash occurred in 1542 when Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo landed near the present site of Ventura. In 1769, Gaspar de Portola led an ex pedition in order to establish the missions and an occupying presence within the Chumash territory. At that time , the Chumash was the largest tribe in Southern California with numbers in the 20,000s. 89 The Spanish government and mission personnel sought to increase Spanish territory, indoctrinate the Chumash in Catholicism, develop a native workforce to assist in the development of Alta California, and eventually create additional tax paying populations.
The Chumash concentrated their villages close to the coast where weather and resources were ideal. This allowed for permanent settlements. The villages were comprised of groups who traced their heritage exclusively through male heirs (patrilineal), and it was not uncommon for multiple families to reside in one large structure. Villages typically consisted of several houses, a sweathouse, a store, a ceremonial structure, a gaming area, and a cemetery. 90 Traditional Chumash dwellings were large, up to 50 feet or more in diameter. They were round domes in shape and were made with pliable yet strong branches, such as those from willows. The poles were driven into the ground in a large circle, bent, then tied together at the top. Interwoven plant material, such as grasses, was then placed over the framing structure.91 The Chumash practiced different subsistence strategies that included hunting, gathering, and fishing. The bow and arrow w ere used most often for hunting larger game such as m ule deer, coyote, and fox. Smaller game was hunted with snares, the deadfall traps described above, and throwing sticks. Aquatic animals were hunted with harpoons using canoes as transportation ma de from wooden planks and asphaltum (natural asphalt). Large shell middens , or trash piles, in the area also reflect the Chumash reliance on the ocean for food.92
A variety of plant foods were consumed by the Chumash ; the main one being acorns. These nuts are rich in nutrients and have a high content of fiber and fat. Storage areas were constructed so that it could be used throughout the year and the nut was ground into meal to be cooked. A wide variety of nuts, wild cherry, and soap plant were also used throughout the year. Other items such as berries, mushrooms, and cress were gathered seasonally to diversify the diet.93
87 Bean, L.J., and C.R. Smith. 1978. Gabrielino. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F. Heizer.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
88 Timbrook, Jan and Johnson, John R. 1999. People of the Sky: Birds in Chumash Culture. Paper presentation at the 22nd Ethnobiology Conference, Oaxaca. Accessed September 27, 2016. Available at:
https://www.sbnature.org/crc/334.html
89 Native American Public Telecommunications. 2006. Assimilation, Relocation, Genocide. Accessed September 20, 2016. Available at: http://www.pbs.org/indiancountry/history/calif.htm 90 Grant, Campbell. 1978. “Eastern Coastal Chumash.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F.
Heizer. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute.
91 Kroeber, A.L. 1976. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. (Reprint, New York, NY: Dover Publications.) 92 Grant, Campbell. 1978. “Eastern Coastal Chumash.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F.
Heizer. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute.
93 Grant, Campbell. 1978. “Eastern Coastal Chumash.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-332
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
The Chumash were involved in trade among themselves and neighboring groups. Interrelations were frequent with the Salinas to the north, the Yokuts to the northeast, and the Gabrielino and Fernandeño to the southeast. Similar cultural traits and environment allowed for a lot of trading of goods. Mainland Chumash supplied groups with vessel s, such as pots, and canoe equipment, while island Chumash supplied chipped tools, fish bone beads, baskets , and stone materials. 94 An array of shells were made into beads and used as currency. The Chumash seem to have been the main manufactures and suppliers of the clam -shell disk bead currency for much of Southern California. The length of a bead strand determined its worth.95
By the 1820s, all of the native Chumash villages had disappeared as a result of the mission system in Santa Barbara.96 In 1824, at Mission Santa Barbara, the Chumash led a revolt against the priests and soldiers in direct response to ill treatment within the missions. 97 These actions would quickly spread to other missions. Heavy work load, poor diet, tight quarters, sanit ation, and new European diseases all contributed to a significant death toll among the native Chumash population. At Mission Santa Barbara alone, more than 4,600 Chumash names are recorded in the death registry.98
The Tataviam
The existing ethnographic information on the Tataviam is limited and limited archaeological research has been directly linked to this group. Most of what is known about the Tataviam comes from the work of two anthropologists, John Harrington (1910s) and Alfred Kroeber (mid -1920s), and from information obtained from the San Fernando Mission’s registers, as well as the limited archaeological record.99
The Tataviam territory extended from the northwest to the southeast, and encompassed portions of the Antelope, San Fernando, and Santa Clarita Valleys. The center of their territory is assumed to have been the Santa Clarita Basin area (upper portion of the Santa Clara River near Valencia), east of Piru Creek near the city of Piru , just north of what is currently known as the Los Angeles metropolitan area. 100 The northern portion of their territory probably included the foothills of Liebre Mountain and Sawmill Mountain, located at the southwestern edge of the Antelope Valley.
The northeast boundary of Tataviam territory included the south-facing slopes of Sawmill Mountain and Sierra Pelona, extending southeast to Soledad Pass near Palmdale. The southeastern boundary is unclear, but it is likely that the upper Soledad Canyon–Acton area was part of Tataviam territory,
Heizer. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute.
94 Grant, Campbell. 1978. “Eastern Coastal Chumash.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed. R.F.
Heizer. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute.
95 Kroeber, A.L. 1976. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. (Reprint, New York, NY: Dover Publications.) 96 California Missions Resource Center. 2003–2016. Native Americans of Santa Barbara. Accessed September 20, 2016. Available at: http://www.missionscalifornia.com/content/native-americans-santa-barbara.html 97 “Timeline.” 2016. City of Santa Barbara. Accessed September 20, 2016. Available at:
http://www.santabarbaraca.gov/services/community/historic/historysb/timeline.asp. 98 Native American Public Telecommunications. 2006. Assimilation, Relocation, Genocide. Accessed September 20, 2016. Available at: http://www.pbs.org/indiancountry/history/calif.html 99 King, Chester D., and Thomas C. Blackburn. 1978. “Tataviam.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed.
William C. Sturtevant. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute. pp. 535–537. 100 Johnson, John R. 1990. “Tataviam Geography and Ethnohistory.” In Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 12(2): 191–214. Banning, CA: Malki Museum, Inc.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-333
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
at least sometime during the Late Prehistoric period. The southern boundary included the high portions of the San Gabriel Mountains and continued to the west towards the Santa Susana Mountains. Piru Creek appears to be the westernmost boundary of the Tataviam territory.101,102
The dialect Tataviam (also known as Alliklik) 103 are considered to be part of the Takic subfamily of the Uto Aztecan language family, who moved inland towards the west and along the California coast. The time frame of the Takic expansion is not clearly defin ed, because migration of the population throughout the region took place at different times. Archaeologist Moratto indicates that Uto-Aztecan speakers migrated to California and that by the end of the Early period ( 2500–2200 BP) Takic groups, such as the Tataviam, the Gabrielino, and the northern Serrano, already had firmly established territories.104
Ethnographic and archaeological information indicates that the Tataviam lived in villages of various sizes, with large centers occupied by about 200 people, widely separated from each other. Large villages were considered to be the major centers. Very small satellite communities of 10 to 15 people were located near the large centers, while mid -size settlements of 20 to 60 people were situated among the large villages. The total Tataviam population at the time of European contact is assumed not to have exceeded 1,000 people.105 The village site located at Vasquez Rocks is known as the Agua Dulce Village (Site Nos. CA-LAN-361 and CA-LAN-373). According to archaeologists King et al.,106 the Agua Dulce Village was larger than the surrounding villages and was probably an important economic and political center. Alliances with other villages were maintained through intermarriage and trade. It is estimated that the popul ation of the Agua Dulce Village was possibly as low as 50 people during the early portion of the Middle period and approximately 200 to 300 people towards the end of the Middle period and throughout the Historic period (after 800 BP).107
Tataviam subsistence strategies were very similar to those of neighboring groups. A variety of plant foods was part of their diet, including the buds of the yucca plant ( Yucca whipplei), a major staple, as well as coast live oak acorns ( Quercus agrifolia ), sage ( Salvia mell ifera), juniper berries (Juniperus californica ), and berries of holly -leaf cherry ( Prunus ilicifolia ). Their diet was also
101 King, Chester D., and Thomas C. Blackburn. 1978. “Tataviam.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed.
William C. Sturtevant. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute. pp. 535–537. 102 Johnson, John R. 1990. “Tataviam Geography and Ethnohistory.” In Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 12(2): 191–214. Banning, CA: Malki Museum, Inc. 103 Kroeber, A. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc. p. 995. (Used the term Alliklik, which was the name used by neighboring Chumash groups and roughly translates grunters or stammerers. The Kitanemuk used the term Tataviam or “people facing the sun” when referring to the inhabitants of the sunny upper Santa Clara River. The term Alliklik is considered to be derogatory, and therefore ceased to be used in literature around the mid-1970s.)
104 Moratto, Michael J. [1984] 2004. California Archaeology. Salinas, CA: Coyote Press. 105 King, Chester D., and Thomas C. Blackburn. 1978. “Tataviam.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed.
William C. Sturtevant. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute. pp. 535–537. 106 King, Chester D., Charles Smith and Tom King. 1974. Archaeological Report Related to the Interpretation of Archaeological Resources Present at Vasquez Rocks County Park. Prepared for: County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation. p. 43.
107 King, Chester D., Charles Smith and Tom King. 1974. Archaeological Report Related to the Interpretation of Archaeological Resources Present at Vasquez Rocks County Park. Prepared for: County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation. p. 33.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-334
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
supplemented with insects, small mammals, deer, and possibly pronghorn.108 The Tataviam cooked the flower stalks of the yucca plant in earth ovens lined with rocks. The final product was stored and consumed throughout the year. The flowers, seeds, and leaves at the base of the plant were also consumed. Archaeological evidence suggests that the Tataviam, as well as most native Southern Californians, traveled a long distance to collect acorns during certain times of the year.
Ethnographic information indicates that acorn was primarily processed using bedrock mortars.
The Tataviam mortuary practices were influenced by their immedia te neighbors, and archaeological evidence indicates that the Tataviam practiced both cremation and inhumation (burials). Among the groups influencing the Tataviam were the Chumash; coastal and inland Chumash were among the few that used inhumation exclusiv ely.109 The Gabrielino practiced both burials and cremation110 until the establishment of the missions, when cremation was eliminated , and burials alone became the norm. Based on his research of the Gabrielinos, McCawley 111 mentions that burials (more common along coastal groups) may have been a result of cultural influence by the Chumash or a practice adopted because scarcity of fuel required for cremations.112 Cremations are recognized in archaeological sites as concentrations of ash and burnt bone fragments. They are often associated with groundstone bowls. With interment (burials) came the practice of grave goods, a practice favored by most of the tribes in California. Grave goods usually consisted of beads of various materials, knives, projectile points, and exotic trade items among other objects. Ethnographic studies, as well as archaeological evidence regarding the presence or absence of grave goods and their quality, have been important archaeological tools to determine social hierarchy among individuals in specific social groups. Excavations at two burial sites in the Agua Dulce Village (Site Nos. CA-LAN-361 and CA-LAN-373) show social differentiation, which is reflected as the presence of exotic trade items in the graves or complete lack of any grave goods.
2.1.3 Historic Context
History of Burbank
The land where the current city of Burbank lies was previously a part of two Spanish and Mexican- era land grants, originally owned by Spanish soldier Jos é María Verdugo. The city was named for Dr. David Burbank, who purchased over 9,200 acres of land in the area in 1867 and built a hugely successful sheep ranch on the property. 113 The area was settled throughout the 1870s and 1880s.
Early settlers grew produce, which they would sell in downtown Los Angeles, connected to the area that would become Burbank by the Cahuenga Pass. By the 1870s, the Southern Pacif ic Railroad arrived in the San Fernando Valley, and began running through Burbank in 1874. 114 With the railroad came a boom of speculative investors, purchasing much of the land from Burbank and
108 King, Chester D., and Thomas C. Blackburn. 1978. “Tataviam.” In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, ed.
William C. Sturtevant. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute. pp. 535–537. 109 Kroeber, A.L. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc. p. 556. 110 McCawley, William. 1996. The First Angelinos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Banning, CA: Malki Museum Press. p. 157.
111 McCawley, William. 1996. The First Angelinos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Banning, CA: Malki Museum Press.
112 McCawley, William. 1996. The First Angelinos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Banning, CA: Malki Museum Press, p. 157.
113 Burbank Unified School District. 2009. “The American Period.” In A History of Burbank. Burbank, CA. 114 Roderick, K. 2011. “Timeline of Valley History” In The San Fernando Valley: America’s Suburb. Los Angeles, CA.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-335
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
offering farm lots to settlers in 1887. 115 The same year saw the establishment of a water system which allowed new farmers to irrigate fields, while the re cently built railroad enable d them to transport and sell their crops more easily.
The town grew steadily throughout the 1890s, despite drought and economic depression that drove many initial investors from the area. 116 When Burbank was incorporated as a city in 1911, the community had 500 residents and a thriving business district. The city continued to thrive, growing to a population of over 3,000 by 1923.117 While growth paused after the Wall Street Crash of 1929, Burb ank’s manufacturing industry remained strong, with companies such as Lockheed Company and Northrop Aircraft Company establishing facilities in the city in 1930. The aviation manufacturing industry continue d to grow in Burbank following the establishment of a major airport in the city and the lead up the World War II.118 The successful aircraft industry, as well as Burbank’s growing entertainment industry attracted more people to the area, and by 1940 the population had doubled to over 34,000. Having already been set up as a main center for motion picture production with the establishment of First National Pictures (later taken over by Warner Brothers), the entertainment continued to thrive with the construction of a multi -million-dollar studio by the Walt Disney Company in 1939.119
Following World War II, Lockheed Company continued to develop planes for the United States armed forces, and postwar real estate boom continue d to fuel Burbank’s growth . The construction of freeways in Southern California through the 1950s and 1960s connected Burbank to the greater Los Angeles area, making the city more accessible , and the population rose to over 90,000 by 1960. Through the 1960s more of the entertainment industry began to relocate to Burbank, including NBC in 1962.
As the population increased, residents spread out away from the city’s downtown, and commerce in Burbank’s business district decreased. In an attempt to revitalize the area, the city developed the Golden Mall, a pedestrian mall closed to automobile traffic. The mall briefly brought in a surge of business activity, but it was during this time, in the late 1960s and early 1970s that Burbank experienced a slow period of development. 120
Present-day Burbank has a population of over 100,000 people and over 150,000 people work within the city. The city remains a center for the entertainment industry, and is home to Warner Bros. Entertainment , Walt Disney Company, Cartoon Network Studios, and The CW. Dubbed “beautiful Downtown Burbank” by comedian Dan Rowan, Burbank is well known for the Magnolia Park neighborhood, home to quiet 1940s -era shopfronts, and the Rancho Equestrian area, where residents can horseback ride along trails and through the area’s numerous parks.
115 Galvin, A and Taniguchi, B. 2009. “City of Burbank Citywide Historic Context Report.” Prepared by: Galvin Preservation Associates, El Segundo, CA.
116 Wes, Clark. 1967. “The American Period”. Burbankia. Available at: http://wesclark.com/burbank/ 117 Burbank Unified School District. 2009. “The American Period.” In A History of Burbank. Burbank, CA. 118 Parker, D. T. 2013. Building victory: Aircraft Manufacturing in the Los Angeles Area in World War II. Cypress, CA. pp. 59, 93, 103-6.
119 Burbank Unified School District. 2009. “The American Period.” In A History of Burbank. Burbank, CA. 120 City of Burbank. 2010. “Burbank History.” Accessed November 2022. Available at:
http://www.ci.burbank.vca.us/index.aspx?page=43.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-336
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
History of Burbank Water and Power
In 1913, two years after the city was incorporated, the City purchased the existing electric and water facilities from the L.C. Brand and El Miradero Water Company , and the Public Service Department (PSD) began operations. Power was first distributed to the city by the Southern California Edison Company, and in 1928 , Burbank joined the Metropolitan Water District (MWD).
In 1931, the City entered a 50-year contract for energy from the Hoover Dam, and power from the dam began to be distributed to the city in 1937. By that time, the City had purchased the remaining Edison facilities and was distributing power via its own power lines.
During a period of rapid industrial growth following World War II, water consumption increased over 500 percent, and in 1947 , the Valley Pumping Plant was constructed. Reservoir Numbers 4 and 5, with a combined capacity of 36 million gallons, were constructed and put into service in 1955. From 1969 to 1975, three new gas turbines (Magnolia No. 5, Oli ve No. 3, and Olive No. 4) were put into service. In 1985, Burbank’s line capacity received an upgrade , increasing to 70 megawatts. The line capacity received another upgrade in 1989 (to 1 05 megawatts) after the City renewed its contract with the Hoover Dam , and entered into a power sales agreements with Portland General Electric and the Bonneville Power Administration.
In 1991 , the City acquired natural gas pipeline capacity with the comp letion of the PGT/PG&E Pipeline Expansion project. I n the same year , the City signed the EPA Consent Decree for Groundwater Cleanup and in 1992 , the Granular Activated Carbon Treatment Plant came into service, treating water previously contaminated during a previous attempt to install fiber-optic link.
With the Reclaimed Water System in place, the initial Citywide Fiber Optic System was put into operation in 1996 and the city began to receive treated groundwater . The Fiber Optic System was interconnected with Los Angeles Department of Water and Power in 1997.
In 2000, the 2000 Magnolia Power Project was created by the Southern California Public Power Authority. This 310 -megawatt cycle generating unit serves the city, and other s in Los Angeles County. The following year, the Southern California Public Power Authority changed to its current name, Burbank Water and Power (BWP) and unveiled the world’s first commercial landfill power plant, producing 330 kilowatts of renewable energy for the city from naturally occurring landfill gas. In 2005, upgrades and expansions to the landfill power plants result in a total of 550 kilowatts of energy produced from a renewable resource. 121
2.2 DOCUMENTED CULTURAL RESOURCE INVESTIGATIONS
On January 21, 2022 , Sapphos Environmental, Inc. received California Historic Resources Information System (CHRIS) record search results from the South Central Coastal Information Center, housed at California State University, Fullerton. The records search indicated that 14 previous s urveys had been completed within a 0.25 -mile radius of the proposed P roject area.
These surveys identified seven (7) resources within the search radius, two (2) of which are located within the proposed Project area.
121 Burbank Water and Power. 2019. “The Development of Electric and Water Services in Burbank.” Available at:
Burbankwaterandpower.com.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-337
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
2.2.1 Documented Archaeological Resources within the Area of Potential Effects
The archaeological resources within the proposed P roject area are not considered significant resources. The resources include the burned -out abandoned Burbank depot, which had previously been reported as destroyed, and a historic deposit of domestic and industrial debris, reported to be previously disturbed and in poor condition. The remaining resources within the 0.25 -mile radius are outside of the proposed Project footprint and would not be af fected by the proposed Project (Table 2.2.1-1, Previously Recorded Archeological Resources within the Research Area).
TABLE 2.2.1-1
PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
WITHIN THE RESEARCH AREA
Primary or Property
Number Trinomial Description
Within
Proposed
Project Area Attribute Codes
Resource
Type
P-19-002530 CA-LAN-002530H Burbank Depot X AH04, AH15 Site P-19-003348 CA-LAN-003348H Historic Artifact
Deposit X AH04 Site
P-19-180751 None U.S. Post Office HP14 Building
P-19-180773 None U.S. Post Office None District
P-190186688 None
Union Pacific
Railroad (UPRR) Wye
and Rail Spurs
HP19, HP37 Building
P-19-186689 None UPRR Concrete
Drainage Channel HP20 Building
P-19-188507 None Commercial Building HP06 Building
2.3 FINDINGS
Methods used to identify potential historic al resources that are significant under the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) within the proposed Project area have included evaluation of historical photographs and maps; review of primary and secondary sources provided by the City and Sapphos Environmental, Inc.; compilation of land use and land ownership information; review of records available through CHRIS; and surveys of the proposed P roject area . These documentation efforts were followed by evaluations for significance.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-338
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
CHAPTER 3.0
UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY OF
SIGNIFICANT CULTURAL RESOURCES
This chapter begins with a description of general categories of cultural resources along with operations and maintenance activities that have the potential to result damage, destruction, or demolition of significant cultural resources afforded protection pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and other federal, state, and local statutes and regulations that would trigger the requirement to avoid or minimize impacts. Impacts are listed in a manner intended to translate directl y to management measures described in Chapter 4 .0, Management Measures that more fully describe those impacts and provide methods to address them.
TYPES AND CAUSES OF IMPACTS
This section describes the known processes that are affecting, or could affect, significant archaeological and Tribal cultural resources (cultural resources) . These include impacts such as natural erosion, facilities maintenance, animal burrowing, recreational use, etc. The manner in which each of these factors may affect cultural resources is briefly described.
3.1 RECOGNIZING ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURES
Archaeological and Tribal cultural resources are the remnants of the prehistoric and historic record of the development of California. Archaeological resources are the material remains of past human life or activities ; and can include Native American stone tools and foundations (Figure 3.1 -1, Representative Archaeological Resource [Stone Tool ]; Figure 3.1 -2, Bedrock Milling Feature; Figure 3.1-3, Archaeological Resource [Historic Glass Bottle] Found at Vasquez Rocks; Figure 3.1- 4, Tribal Cultural Landscape, Vasquez Rocks ). Tribal cultural resources are described by CEQA as either (1) ”sites, features, places, cultural landsca pes, sacred places and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe” that are included in the state register of historical resources or a local register of historical resources, or that are determined to be eligible for inclusion in th e State register; or (2) resources determined by the lead agency, in its discretion, to be significant based on the criteria for listing in the State historical register. Cultural landscapes show how humans have used and adapted natural resources over time through agriculture, mining, ranching, and settlement activities. Tribal cultural resources include sites, features, places, landscapes, sacred places, and objects of cultural value to a California Native American Tribe. These resource ty pes are commonly discovered in undisturbed, or native, soils. However, some of these resource types will be on the ground surface and may include exposed rock faces and rock art. Not all archaeological or Tribal cultural resources are significant, but careful research and documentation must be conducted by a qualified professional to dete rmine a resource’s significance or lack thereof.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-339
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
Figure 3.1-1. Representative Archaeological Resource (Stone Tool) SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2012
Figure 3.1-2. Bedrock Milling Feature
SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2014
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-340
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
Figure 3.1-3. Archaeological Resource (Historic Glass Bottle) Found at Vasquez Rocks SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2012
Figure 3.1-4. Tribal Cultural Landscape, Vasquez Rocks
SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2004
3.2 RECOGNIZING THREATS AND IMPACTS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND TRIBAL
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Management practices to address potential threats to significant cultural resources require consideration of all possible impacts (referred to as “adverse effects” within the National Historic Preservation Act), followed by pro-active solutions to avoid or mitigate (lessen and/or control) those conditions. Measures to address impacts to significant archaeological resources can be found in Chapter 4.0, Management Measures; Sections 4.1 through 4.6.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-341
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
Ground Disturbance. Any ground -disturbance activities, including those involved with the construction of new facilities and the maintenance and repair of facilities ; Americans with Disabilities Act ( ADA) improvements for path of travel and ramps; repair or replacement of irrigation lines ; storm conveyance and water quality management ; landscaping or tree replacement; have the potential to impact archaeological and Tribal cultural resources. These include but are not limited to trenching for utility lines, grading for construction, excavation for tree planting, installation of signage and fencing, and demolition of existing facilities. It is recognized that the majority of facilities at the BWP Campus were constructed in areas that were previously graded and soils have been disturbed as a result. Soils disturbed during the construction of the facilities have little or no probability of yielding in situ (undisturbed) significant archaeological or Tribal cultural resources. However, when such activities are undertaken in previously undisturbed areas deeper than the original grading to construct a facility (native soils; Figure 3.2-1, Example of Trenching in Native Soil at Vasquez Rocks ), there is the poten tial to encounter unanticipated archaeological or Tribal cultural resources. One method to ascertain this depth of native soils below the present ground surface (Figure 3.2-2, Example of Stratigraphy showing Disturbed Soil in the Upper Layer and Native Undisturbed Paleo Soil in the Lower Layers at Los Angeles County Arboretum and Botanic Garden ) is to review the plans and specifications for the original and subsequent phase (s) of construction. Stratigraphy is the study of layers and positions of s oils.
Another method is to conduct archaeological or geotechnical testing through shovel testing or auguring.
Figure 3.2-1. Example of Trenching in Native Soil at Vasquez Rocks SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2011
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-342
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
Figure 3.2-2. Example of Stratigraphy showing Disturbed Soil in the Upper Layer and Native Undisturbed Paleo Soil in the Lower Layers at Los Angeles County Arboretum and Botanic Garden
SOURCE: County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation, 2017
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-343
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
CHAPTER 4.0
MANAGEMENT MEASURES
This chapter of the Resource Protection Plan describes the management measures that may be used to avoid or minimize impacts to significant archaeological and Tribal cultural resources (cultural resources), as a result of the unanticipated discovery of such resources during construction, operation, or maintenance activities associated with the proposed Project. Such activities may be undertaken by City personnel, volunteers, and contractors.
This section describe s a variety of measures for the management of cultural resources, including procedures for avoiding future impacts to significant sites, monitoring plans, and other measures that may be taken for the protection or conservation of significant resources.
4.1 PRE-CONSTRUCTION TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES TRAINING
Prior to the initiation of ground -disturbing activities in native ( i.e., non-fill) soil, the City shall require monitoring of all ground -disturbing activities by a Qualified Archaeologist. The Qualified Archaeologist shall have a pre-construction meeting to explain the construction monitoring process and provide training on ho w to recognize Tribal cultural resources encountered during earthmoving activities.
4.2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES PROTOCOL
The potential exists to encounter buried prehistoric and/or historic remains within the project area.
Prehistoric remains are defined as those produced by Native American peoples and can include lithics (tools), hearths, and human and/or animal bone. Known prehistoric and Tribal cultural resources within and nearby a potential project site can include:
• Projectile points / flaked stone (arrow and spear heads) • Portable and bedrock milling stations
• Stone cairns (rock piles)
• Stone hearths
• Roasting pits
• Shell middens (trash piles)
• Burials
• Rock art (petroglyphs and pictographs)
Historic archaeological resources, defined as older than 50 years or of having significance to Native American groups, cover the span of time associated with the European settlement of No rth America. These resources include buildings, current Native American sacred sites, industrial equipment, wells, and so forth. Known historic archaeological resources within and nearby a project may include:
• Trash scatters
• Native American sacred sites
• Building remains or foundations no longer in use
• Fire pits
• Retaining walls/berms
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-344
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
• Remains of equipment
Artifacts and features that are potentially diagnostic of unique archaeological resources include:
• Groundstone lithic artifacts (bowls, grinding stones)
• Projectile points (arrowheads, spear points)
• Hearth features (fire pits associated with prehistoric artifacts)
• Archaeological artifacts most likely to be encountered during construction include:
o Lithic flakes (byproducts from stone tool making)
o Groundstone lithic (tool) artifacts
o Shell
o Bone (animal or human)
o Historic-era refuse (trash piles)
Archaeological materials found by workers are not personal property and must be submitted to the City Curator. The location of archaeological sites is confidential information that cannot be shared with the public. The locational information is confidential to protect the sites from pot hunters and metal detectorists. Looting artifacts from an archaeolo gical site is crime that is punishable by fines and/or prison time. The person who commits these crimes will pay the fines/serve the prison time; not the City.
4.3 AVOIDANCE
This section include s measures to be used to avoid inadvertent future disturbance to prehistoric/ historic cultural resources.
The location al data for archaeological resources is confidential and shall not be circulated for public review. To protect the sites from unauthorized excavation, looting, and/or vandalism, the City has been notified of the need to keep the location of known archaeological resources confidential. Records in the information centers are exempt from the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250 et seq.).
Government Code Section 6254 explicitly authorizes public agencies to withhold information from the public relating to “Native American graves, cemeteries, and sacred places maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission.” Due to the sensitive natur e of cultural resources described herein, this report is confidential and meant for the exclusive use of the City, and other trustee and responsible agencies related to planning, construction, operation, maintenance, and management activities.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-345
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
4.3.1 Avoidance of Recorded Archaeological Sites during Ground-Disturbing Activities
Any work that involves earth -moving activity in previously undisturbed native soils should be coordinated with the City. Personnel involved in excavation, grading , or any other ground - disturbing activities in native soils should receive pre-construction cultural resources training before taking part in such activities.
Wherever feasible and practical, projects requiring ground -disturbing activities should be designed to avoid such activities within 60 feet of the boundary of unique archaeological resources, significant historical resources, or Tribal cultural resources. Coordination should be undertaken with the City to determine if there are any documented unique archaeological resources, significant historical resources, or Tribal cultural resources within the area where ground-disturbing activities are required.
Where the vertical and horizontal extent of the resou rce has not been established, a Phase II investigation (the find is assessed by a Qualified Archaeologist to determine the resource’s ability to yield important information) to establish the lateral extent of the protected resource may be warranted. Once t he boundary of the resource has been established, the project should be designed, when possible, to avoid ground-disturbing activities within 60 linear feet of the resource.
Where it is determined to be infeasible to avoid a known resource, the appropriate level of environmental evaluation required pursuant to CEQA should be undertaken to identify mitigation measures to avoid, reduce, or compensate for significant impacts.
Where materials that are potentially diagnostic (indicates a particular time period) of unique archaeological resources, significant historical resources, or Tribal cultural resources are encountered during construction, work should be halted until the mat erials can be reviewed by a Qualified Archaeologist and a final determination regarding their potential significance pursuant to federal, state, and local statutes and regulations can be rendered.
4.4 MONITORING
In addition, the City may retain a Native American Monitor. If it elects to retain such a monitor, such monitor shall be affiliated with the local tribe with cultural ties to the proposed Project site and such tribe shall also be designated by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC - Designated Tribes). Such Native American monitor shall be present during the ground -disturbing native activities in undisturbed soils within the proposed Project area. In addition, the NAHC - Designated Tribes, or those who have identified t hemselves directly to the City as having an interest in the proposed Project shall attend the pre-construction meeting to conduct Tribal cultural resource sensitivity training. Such sensitivity training shall include a handout and focus on how to recognize Tribal cultural resources encountered during earthmoving activities.
If previously unknown Tribal cultural resources are encountered during construction, then the resources shall either be left in situ and avoided through redesign, or the resources shall be salvaged, recorded, and reposited at a repository consistent with the provisions of a Phase III data recovery program and the provisions of the Resource Protection Plan, specified in CUL -1. The Resource Protection Plan shall include further consultation with the identified Tribal representatives.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-346
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
4.5 RESPONSE TO UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION
In the event an archaeological resource (for example, chipped stone, historic materials, or human remains) is identified during excavation in native or disturbed soil, the City shall be notified and all work within 60 feet of the discovery will stop until a Qualified Archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards can assess the significance of the find in accordance with California law (36 CFR Part 800.13 ) in the event that a previously unidentified archaeological resource is located.
If a Qualified Archaeologist is not on site, then the area must be cordoned off until the monitor or a Qualified Archaeologist can be contacted to assess the find. This may include fencing, tarps, and the posting of a worker to stand guard, as needed, to protect the find from damage or looting.
Should the find be determined to consist of human remains, the Qualified Archaeologist will notify the County Coroner within 24 hours. Should a Qualified Archaeologist be unavailable, the on-site monitor or project manager will contact the Coroner as outlined in this section . Work will not continue within 100 feet until directed by the County Coroner. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are or are believed to be Native American, they shall notify the NAHC within 24 hours. The NAHC shall immediately notify the mostly like descendent (s) (MLD) of the deceased individual, in accordance with Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code . The MLD(s) shall be granted access to the site for inspection and give their recommendation for treatment of the remains within 48 hours. The MLD’s recommendation may include scientific removal and non -destructive analysis of the human remains, and any a rtifacts associated with the burial. The City shall comply with the MLD’s recommendation if feasible, and in the event that the recommendation is rejected, the agency shall rebury the remains with appropriate dignity in a location that will not be subject to further ground disturbing activities within a time frame agreed upon by the City and the MLD(s) (14 California Code of Regulations s §15064.5 (e)).
If the find is determined by a Qualified Archaeologist or monitor to be an archaeological site not associated with human remains, the site will be recorded in its original place as outlined below (Section 4.5.1, Recordation). Work will not continue in the area until directed by a Qualified Archaeologist.
If the find is determined to be an isolated artifact (isolate), then the isolate will be recorded as outlined below (Section 4.5.1, Recordation). Should the isolate warrant further study or be of exceptional value, it will be collected and curated. Work will not continue in the area until directed by a Qualified Archaeologist.
4.5.1 Recordation
The Qualified Archaeologist will either clear the site and document in a memorandum for the record detailing the information used to make a determination that the resource was not unique or significant or notify the construction foreman o r work supervisor and the City that the resource appears to be unique or significant requiring recordation.
Site avoidance is the preferred method of managing archaeologi cal resources during construction.
However, site evaluation and data recovery may be necessary, if avoidance of the resource is not feasible (as determined through consultation between a Qualified Archaeologist and the City), then the appropriate course of action will be undertaken consistent with the provisions of this Resource ATTACHMENT 2
A2-347
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
Protection Plan, or any applicable Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program adopted pursuant to CEQA.
4.5.2 Site Evaluation and Data Recovery
If direct impacts to an archaeological site cannot be avoided, site evaluation would follow in order to evaluate both integrity (level of disturbance) and eligibility for the site for listing in the NRHP , CRHR, and/or Designated Historic Resource. Initial evaluations may include surface investigation, subsurface test excavation, and/or data recovery.
In addition, coordination with interested Native American tribes identified by the N AHC shall be undertaken. Local tribes shall be contacted by a spe cified Qualified Archaeologist, and a Native American monitor(s) may be retained to be present on site during all ground disturbing activities, including Phase II investigations /evaluations (if needed), Phase III data recovery (if needed), and construction activities if requested . The Native American monitor(s) shall coordinate with the Qualified Archaeologist and the C ity to ensure the appropriate treatment of archaeological resources.
Phase I Walkover Survey
In most cases, a surface and/or subsurface evaluation is conducted in order to identify the full extent of an archaeological resource, as well as the nature and type of cultural materials present within the site. This information is required to evaluate if the archaeologic al resource has the potential to yield important information to history and/or prehistory. Therefore, the first step will require a systematic walkover of the area to identify the locations of surface artifacts and features of the site. A detailed map of t hese cultural resources will be made, and a representative sample of surface artifacts may be collected for analysis.
Phase II Testing Plan
A Phase II testing program shall be implemented if project elements cannot be relocated at least 60 feet from an archaeological site. Initial Phase II evaluations will use an intensive surface inventory and a small number of shovel test pits to evaluate the horizontal and vertical distribution of cultural materials within areas that will be affected by ground disturbance, and to determine whether the site would be impacted by the ground disturbance.
In many cases, one of the primary goals of the Phase II in vestigation will be to determine the horizontal and vertical extent of the boundary of the archaeological site. Towards this end, a systematic walkover of the area will be undertaken to identify the locations of surface artifacts and features of the site. A detailed map of these cultural resources will be produced , and a representative sample of surface artifacts may be collected for analysis.
For historic period sites, archival research may also be required to determine the resource’s significance and eligibility for listing in the NRHP, CRHR, and/or Designated Historic Resource. A Qualified Archaeologist (s) may carry out documentary research and information interviews to achieve these objectives. Materials useful for these Phase II investigations may incl ude property records and plats, death and marriage records, census data, historic maps and photographs, local newspapers, and oral interviews.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-348
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
The final component of the Phase II analysis will involve the formal evaluation of the significance and integrity of the archaeological resource. Assessments of significance involve considerations of all the available data and interpretations of the archae ological resources with respect to the NRHP, CRHR, and Designed Historic Resource criteria of evaluation. In addition to meeting at least one of the four criteria for inclusion in the NRHP, CRHR, and/or Designated Historic Resource , the site must exhibit a relatively high level of integrity in terms of retaining its location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association. If an archaeological site is found to be eligible for listing in the NRHP, CRHR, and/or Designated Historic Resource, then the impacts of the approved project on the significant archaeological resource need to be determined. In those cases, where a project’s impacts may cause substantial adverse change in the significance of a site , object, or resource; potentially feasible measures shall be identified that mitigate the significant adverse changes in the significance of the significant archaeological resource to less than significant.
Verification
Each site-specific testing plan, including research design and research questions, shall be reviewed and approved by the C ity prior to implementation. The findings of the evaluation(s) will be presented in a report. Once accepted, the final version of this report shall be submitted to the City, to the SCCIC, and an appropriate curation facility. Following the completion of the testing program, any collections obtained during the evaluation(s) will be deposited in a qualified repository (museum or university for example ) that will safeguard and permanently store the collection in accordance with current professional standards.
Phase III Data Recovery
A data recovery effort shall be implemented for those prehistoric and historic archaeological sites determined to be significant through testing and evaluation. The primary objective of the data recovery shall be the retrieval of important information from NRHP , CRHR, and/or Designated Historic Resource -eligible sites. The City shall ensure that the data recovery program has been completed for any area containing a site determined to be significant and for which it can be demonstrated that information important in prehistory or history can be recovered.
Goals of the field work may include confirming and more accurately documenting the horizontal and vertical extent of the site in order to understand the interrelationsh ip of the features and artifacts, and to determine the chronology and contextual relationship of the cultural deposits.
Subsurface investigations shall also be conducted when appropriate and will utilize relatively intensive excavation strategies including close interval (dense) shovel test pits, surface scrapes, isolated test units, block excavation units, linear trenching, or a combination of these methods. In some cases, the use of mechanical equipment may also be appropriate for removing the non - cultural fill (fill dirt brought from other locations) that overlies subsurface deposits within the impact area. The mechanical excavation of soil by backhoes and bull dozers may expose features within the impact area that are not visible on the surface, thereby permitting a more thorough assessment of activity areas and patterns of site use.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-349
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
Archival research may also be required as part of the investigation of historic-period sites. The main purpose of this archival work will be to augment the informa tion that was previously identified during the testing program in order to address the research questions and issues outlined in the data recovery plan. A Qualified Archaeologist (s) may carry out documentary research and information interviews to achieve t hese objectives. Materials useful for these investigations may include property records and plats, death and marriage records, census data, historic maps and photographs, local newspapers, and oral interviews.
Verification
The data recovery plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to its implementation.
The City shall ensure that the data recovery program has been completed prior to the issuance of a construction permit for any area containing a site determined to be significant and for which it can be demonstrated that information important in prehistory or history can be recovered. The findings of the Phase III investigations will be presented in a report that follows the State of California Office of Historic Preservation guidelines.1 The final version of this report shall be submitted to the City and the S CCIC. Following the completion of the data recovery program, any collections obtained during the Phase III investigations will be deposited in a qualified repository (museum or university for example) which will safeguard and permanently curate the collection in accordance with current professional standards (Section 4.5.3, Curation Procedures).
4.5.3 Curation Procedures
Archaeological collections, final reports, field notes, and other standard documentation collected during project implementation shall be permanently curated (stored) at a facility that meets the State of California Office of Historic Preservation’s Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Collections.2
The curation and preservation service selected for any monitoring, site evaluation, and/or data recovery shall be required to secure a written agreement with a recognized museum repository, such as the County Natural History Museum or a comparable institution. The designated curation facility will permanently house and maintain the archaeological resources recovered as a result of the monitoring, testing, and/or data recovery. The written curation agreement shall specify the level of treatment (preparation, identification, curation, cataloging) required before the collection would be accepted for storage.
4.6 RESPONSE TO UNANTICIPATED DISCOVERY OF HUMAN REMAINS ENCOUNTERED
DURING CONSTRUCTION
If human remains are unearthed during g round-disturbing construction activities —including, but not limited to, grading, grubbing or vegetation removal, and excavation—all work in the immediate vicinity must stop until the County Coroner can determine whether the remains are those of a Native American. If a cultural resource monitor is present, the monitor , the construction foreman, or the work supervisor will stop all work and contact the County Coroner (phone: 323-343-0512).
1 California Office of Historic Preservation. 1990. Archaeological Resources Management Reports (ARMR):
Recommended Contents and Format. Accessed 7 August 2009. Available at:
http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/1054/files/armr.pdf
2 California Department of Parks and Recreation. 1993. Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Collections.
Available at: http://www.chris.ca.gov/pages/1054/files/guide93.pdf ATTACHMENT 2
A2-350
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
The location of the discovery site should be secured at all times. Vehicles, equipment, and unauthorized personnel will not be permitted within 100 feet of the discovery site until work is allowed to resume. Work may not resume until notification requirements and proper assessments have been completed. Work to stop within 100 feet of the find so that the Qualified Archaeologist can safely recover and determine the extent of the find. For the purposes of this Resource Protection Plan, monitoring and work stoppages to occur within 60 feet of the find at the discretion of the Qualified Monitor.
Human remains located on non-federal-held lands must comply with California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5, which states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to California law (PRC Section 5097.98). In addition, the California Health and Safety Code states that six or more human burials at one location constitute a cemetery (Section 8100), and willful disturbance of human remains is a felony (Section 7052).
Federal laws require specific procedures to be used when Native American remains are discovered on federally owned/managed lands. If human remains are identified on federal lands, the location of the remains will be recorded, and the County Coroner will be notified immediately. If t he County Coroner determines the remains are archaeological and Native American in origin, the City, as the lead agency, will adhere to the Native American Grave Protection Act (NAGPRA).
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-351
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
CHAPTER 5.0
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
This Resource Protection P lan has been prepared to support the efforts by the City to avoid significant impacts to cultural resources to the maximum extent prac tical and feasible. The goal is to complete the required due diligence and proposed Project review to avoid impacts to known resources and facilitate th e appropriate course of action if there is an unanticipated discovery of cultural resources during operations, m aintenance, or c onstruction activities (Table 5 -1, Recommended Course of Action to Avoid Significant Impacts to Cultural Resources).
TABLE 5-1
RECOMMENDED COURSE OF ACTION TO
AVOID SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS TO CULTURAL RESOURCES
Phase of
Development
Responsible
Party Recommended Action Desired Outcome
Ongoing
Operations
and
Maintenance
Activities
City of Burbank
Pre-construction cultural
resources training meeting
for County Personnel and
Contractors that have the
potential to affect cultural
resources
• Avoid known resources and notify
of unanticipated discovery of
cultural resources
• Notify County Coroner if bones
potentially resembling human
remains are found during
construction
• Use low-impact and avoidance
measures to conserve materials
Construction City of Burbank
Implement mitigation
measures
• Comply with project design features
• Comply with mitigation measures
• Assess the unanticipated discovery
of artifacts
• Notify County Coroner if bones
potentially resembling human
remains are found during
construction
In the event an archaeological resource is identified during excavation (e.g., chipped stone, historic materials, or human remains), all work wi thin 60 feet of t he discovery will stop until a Qualified Archaeologist can assess the significance of the find in acc ordance with 36 Code of Federal Regulations Part 800.13. The following section details the methods that may be r equired in the event that a previously unidentified archaeological resource is located.
5.1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
The following awareness and avoidance measures shall take place prior to any ground -disturbing construction or building repair/modification activities:
• Prior to conducting ground disturbing activities, a pre-construction meeting will b e held for all workers involved in construction activities to provide cultural and Tribal resources training.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-352
Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project Resource Protection Plan December 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
The following monitoring, ev aluation, data r ecovery, and unanticipated discovery measures, if necessary, shall take place after ground-disturbing construction activities have commenced:
• A Qualified Arc haeologist shall monitor ground -disturbing activitie s within undisturbed native (non -fill) soil . The proposed Project manager shall notify the archaeological monitor at least 24 hours, and up to 48 hours, when possible, in advance when a monitor is needed. The City may retain a Native American Monitor. If it elects to retain such a monitor, such monitor shall be affiliated with the local tribe with cultural ties to the project site and such tribe shall also be designated by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC -Designated Tribes). Such Native American moni tor shall be present during the ground - disturbing native activities in undisturbed soils within the proposed Project area. In addition, the NAHC -Designated Tribes, or those who have identified themselves directly to the City as having an interest in proposed Project shall attend the pre- construction meeting to conduct Tribal cultural resource sensitivity training . Such sensitivity training shall include a handout and f ocus on how to recognize Tribal cultural resources encountered during earthmoving activities.
• If direct impacts to an archaeological site or Tribal cultur al resource by ground - disturbing activities cannot be avoided, a Phase II investigation, or assessment of the site or resource ’s likelihood of yielding important inf ormation or data and significance, will be conducted by an archaeologist who meets the Secr etary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards, in order to determine significance of the discovered archaeological or Tribal cultural resource. All construction activities in the immediate area of the find shall be halted until notified by t he qualified archaeologist while the Phase II investigation is underway.
• A Phase III data recovery effort, or excavation and testing archaeological or Tribal cultural resources, in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines [Section 21083.2 (d)], shall be implemented by the City for thos e s ites or resou rces determined to be significant through Phase II testing and eval uation. All construction activities within 60 feet of the find shall be halted, not to resume until notified by the Qualified Archaeologist, while the Phase III data recovery effort is underway.
• In the event of an u nanticipated discovery of cultural resources and/or human remains, all work within 100 feet of the find shall halt until the protocols specified in Section 4. 6, Response to Unanticipated Discovery of Human Rema ins Encountered during Construction, have been completed. Work to stop within 100 feet of the find so that the Qualified Archaeologist can safely recover and determine the extent of the find.
5.2 CONCLUSION
By being able to identify significant archaeological and Tribal cultural resources and implementing the man agement measures , the C ity is helping to ensure the survival of its significant cultural resources for future generations.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-353
BWP Campus Stormwater Improvement Project
Initial Study May 2023
Attachment 8
Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-354
Limited Phase II
Environmental Site Assessment Report
City of Burbank
Magnolia Power Plant Storm Water Improvement Project
164 West Magnolia Boulevard
Burbank, California 91502
Yorke Engineering, LLC
31726 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 218 | San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 November 12, 2020 | Project No. 211491001
Geotechnical | Environmental | Construction Inspection & Testing | Forensic Engineering & Expert Witness Geophysics | Engineering Geology | Laboratory Testing | Industrial Hygiene | Occupational Safety | Air Quality | GIS ATTACHMENT 2
A2-355
Limited Phase II Environmental Site
Assessment Report
City of Burbank
Magnolia Power Plant Storm Water Improvement Project
164 West Magnolia Boulevard
Burbank, California 91502
Mr. Geoff Knight, CPEA, QISP
Principal Scientist
Yorke Engineering, LLC
31726 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 218 | San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 November 12, 2020 | Project No. 211491001
Anthony Lizzi, PG, CHG
Principal Geologist
Keith F. Gilbert, PG
Senior Geologist
KFG/AJL/mlc/sc/mlc
Distribution: (1) Addressee (via e-mail)
355 South Grand Avenue, Ste. 2450 | Los Angeles, California 90071 | p. 213.488.5111 | www.ninyoandmoore.com
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-356
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 i
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 OBJECTIVE 1
3 SITE IDENTIFICATION 2
4 SITE LOCATION AND DE SCRIPTION 2
5 ENVIRONMENTAL BACKGR OUND 3
5.1 Historical Site Uses 3
5.1.1 Southern Parcel - BWP Campus 3
5.1.2 Northern Parcel - North Varney Street 3
5.2 Previous Assessments 3
5.2.1 URS Phase II Environmenta l Assessment (2001) 3
5.2.2 Dudek Subsurface Soil Investigation Report (2014) 4
5.2.3 Yorke Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (2019) 6
5.2.4 MNS Engineering Offsite and Onsite Improvement Plans (2020) 6 6 PHYSICAL SETTING 7
6.1 Topography 7
6.2 Geology and Site Geology 7
6.3 Groundwater 8
7 FIELD ACTIVITIES 8
7.1 Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan 8
7.2 Permits 9
7.3 Notifications 9
7.4 Soil Boring Locations 9
7.5 Underground Service Alert and Geophysical Surveys 9
7.6 Drilling and Soil Sampling 10
7.6.1 Soil Sampling Proce dures 10
7.7 Decontamination Procedures 11
7.8 Investigation -Derived Waste Management 11
8 ANALYTICAL TESTING 11
9 FIELD VARIANCE/QUALI TY ASSURANCE/QUALITY
CONTROL 11
10 ANALYTICAL RESULTS 12
10.1 Soil Analytical Results 12
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-357
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 ii
10.1.1 Title 22 Metals 12
10.1.2 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbo ns (TPH) 13
10.1.3 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) 13
11 DISCUSSION 13
11.1 Soil 13
11.1.1 Title 22 Metals 13
11.1.2 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) 14
11.1.3 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) 14
12 CONCLUSIONS AND RECO MMENDATIONS 14
13 LIMITATIONS 15
14 REFERENCES 17
TABLES
1 – Soil Sample Analytical Results – Title 22 Metals
2 – Soil Sample Analytical Results – TPHs
3 – Soil Sample Analytical Results – VOCs
FIGURES
1 – Site Location
2 – On-Site Southern Parcel Boring Locations
3 – Off-Site Northern Parcel Boring Locations
APPENDICES
A – Boring Logs
B – Off-Site Excavation Permit
C – Work Plan Approval Permit
D – Photographs
E – Field Procedures
F – Geophysical Survey Reports
G – Analytical Laboratory Reports
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-358
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 1
1 INTRODUCTION
This report presents a summary of a Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) conducted for the City of Burbank Department of Water and Power ( BWP) storm water improvement project (SWIP) on properties at 164 West Magnolia Boulevard and in North Varney Street in Burbank, California (collectively defined as the “site”; Figure 1).
The site consists of two parcels : 1) an on -site southern parcel within the BWP campus and; 2) an off-site northern parcel that includes a portion of North Varney Street in Burbank, California.
The on-site southern parcel improvements consist of modifications to the storm drain piping of the BWP campus to redirect the storm water which currently discharges to the Burbank Western Flood Control Channel ( BWFCC) outfall into a new 280,00 0-gallon underground storage facility.
From this point, stormwater will be transferred by pumping and used in the adjacent onsite cooling towers or infiltrated into the ground. The off-site northern parcel improvements consist of the construction of storm drain pipelines, manholes, and inlets in the City of Burbank in West Magnolia Boulevard and North Varney Street. The work will redirect stormwater currently directed onto the BWP campus offsite to a new connection for discharge to the BWFCC at North Varney Street.
Our work was performed in accordance with Ninyo & Moore’s proposal to Yorke Engineering, LLC (Yorke), dated July 31, 2020. This ESA is being submitted to Yorke for use in the design and construction of the SWIP as well as to evaluate health and safety needs to help protect workers performing the SWIP improvements.
2 OBJECTIVE
The BWP plans to construct an on-site storm drain improvement in the southeast area of the BWP site (Figure 2) and the installation of an underground 36-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe storm drain along North Varney Street (Figure 3).
The objective of the ESA was to evaluate the current subsurface conditions present in soil as a result of previous contamination found at 1) the on-site southern parcel based on a Phase II ESA that was conducted in 2001 at the BWP campus and 2) during various assessments conducted from 1990 to 2014 at the former International Electronics Research Corporation facility located at the northeast corner of North Varney Street and West Magnolia Boulevard that directly abuts the off- site northern parcel . Findings from this Limited ESA will be used to evaluate the presence of possible chemicals that may compromise the safety of construction workers performing the SWIP improvements, and to ensure proper disposal of any contamination encountered during the SWIP project.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-359
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 2
3 SITE IDENTIFICATION
Site information is provided as follows.
Business Name: City of Burbank, Department of Water and Power Site Addresses: 164 West Magnolia Boulevard
Burbank, California 91502
Assessor's Parcel No.: 2451-011-900
Property Owner / Responsible Party: City of Burbank
Department of Water and Power
164 West Magnolia Boulevard
Burbank, California 91502
Contact Person: Ms. Claudia Reyes
Senior Environmental Engineer
164 West Magnolia Boulevard
Burbank, California 91502
Consultant: Ninyo & Moore
475 Goddard
Irvine, California 92618
Phone No. (949) 753-7070
4 SITE LOCATION AND DE SCRIPTION
The site consists of two parcels 1) an on-site southern parcel within the BWP campus and 2) an off-site northern parcel that includes a portion of North Varney Street in Burbank, California.
The on-site southern parcel is approximately 0.5-acres in size and lies within the BWP campus (located at 164 West Magnolia Boulevard), which encompasses approximately 22.5 acres. The BWP campus is bounded by West Magnolia Boulevard on the northwest, the BWFCC on the northeast, commercial/industrial use and West Olive Street on the southeast and commercial/industrial use and North Lake Street on the southwest. The BWP campus contains a variety of active and inactive electrical generation facilities and support facilities for various City operations. There are no structures on the southern parcel, which consists of a large, flat asphalt-paved area surr ounded by various equipment and structures that are part of the BMP Campus. The on-site southern parcel area and sampling locations are shown in Figure 2.
The off-site northern parcel along North Varney Street is approximately 0.18-acres in size and includes a landscaped median near its intersection with West Magnolia Boulevard and extends along North Varney Street to the BWFCC. There are no structures on the northern area, other than an elevated roadway structure that carries West Magnolia Boulevard over t he adjacent BWFCC. The North Varney Street portion is bounded by commercial/industrial use on the ATTACHMENT 2
A2-360
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 3
northwest, by the BWFCC on the northeast, by West Magnolia Boulevard on the southeast, and the intersection of West Magnolia B oulevard and North Varney Street on the west. The off-site northern parcel area and sampling locations are shown in Figure 3. 5 ENVIRONMENTAL BACKGR OUND
5.1 Historical Site Uses
5.1.1 Southern Parcel - BWP Campus
The southern parcel has been used as the BWP plant operations yard since at least the late 1940’s. Prior use was not clearly established, although based on review of available historical aerial photographs, agricultural activities appear to have occurred in the 1920’s and perhaps later (Yorke, 2019).
5.1.2 Northern Parcel - North Varney Street
The City streets that comprise the northern parcel appear to have been in place earlier than the 1920’s and have changed relatively little, other than the reconstruction and elevation of West Magnolia Boulevard. However, prior to about 1960 a portion of the parcel which is now North Varney Street was occupied by several businesses, including a small cleaning compound manufacturer (Yorke, 2019).
5.2 Previous Assessments
Ninyo & Moore reviewed the following environmental assessment and SWIP documents:
• URS, 2001. Lim ited Phase II Environmental Assessment, Burbank Magnolia Power Plant, Burbank, California, August.
• Dudek, 2014. Former International Electronic Research Corporation Facility, Subsurface Soil Investigation Report, August.
• Yorke Engineering, LLC, 2019. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Burbank Water and Power, Storm Water Improvement Project, Burbank, CA, May. • MNS Engineering, Inc., 2020. Offsite and Onsite Improvement Plans, 60% Draft – Not for Construction, City of Burbank Department of Water and Power , Storm Water Improvement Project, June.
5.2.1 URS Phase II Environmental Assessment (2001)
The 2001 Phase II ESA at the BWP facility consisted of drilling and sampling a total of 20 soil borings and analyzing the samples for a wide variety of potential chemical impacts including total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH s), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) ATTACHMENT 2
A2-361
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 4
and metals . The limits of this Phase II ESA, however, did not extend into the on-site southern parcel. URS stated that detectable concentrations of TPH and/or VOCs were encountered in shallow soils surrounding the fuel oil aboveground storage tanks ( ASTs).
A former 78,000-barrel fuel oil AST was located north of the southern parcel.
5.2.2 Dudek Subsurface Soil Investigation Report (2014) International Electronics Research Corporation (IERC) occupied the property located at the northeast corner of North Varney Street and West Magnolia Boulevard that directly abuts the off-site northern parcel.
In April 1990, clarifiers at the site were sampled, pumped, and cleaned in the presence of the LARWQCB personnel, and the consultant. Upon cleanup, the clarifiers were reportedly intact and did not appear to have fractures or other structural defects. Water samples were collected from the three - and four-stage clarifiers; one sludge sample was collected from the first stage of 4 -stage clarifier. The sludge and water samples were analyzed for pH, oil and grease, VOCs, and flashpoint. The sludge sample was also analyzed for metals. Sample results showed the presence of acetone, tetrachloroethylene (PCE), ethylbenzene, and low concentrations of metals.
In June 1990, nine soil borings were advanced using hand -augers in the vicinity of the clarifiers. Soil samples contai ned PCE, trichloroethylene (TCE), TPH, and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes.
In September/October of 1991 , a limited subsurface investigation was conducted at the site. A total of eight soil borings were advanced near the clarifiers and AST locations.
The borings were advanced to between approximately 16 and 50 feet below ground surface (bgs). Soil samples were collected every 5 feet starting at approximately 5 feet bgs and were analyzed for VOCs and TPH. TPH was detected in two of the eight soil borings at approximately 1.5 feet bgs with a maximum concentration of 5,300 micrograms per kilogram (μg/kg). PCE was detected in each of the eight soil borings with a maximum concentration of 30,000 μg/kg at approximately 1.5 feet bgs.
TCE was detected in six of the eight soil borings with a maximum concentration of 260.0 μg/kg at approximately 40 feet bgs. Low concentrations of ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylenes were detected in one soil borings with maximum concentrations of 0.9 μg/kg, 1.0 μg/kg, and 2.0 μg/kg, respectively.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-362
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 5
In May 1993, Dudek conducted a soil gas survey at the site. PCE was detected in the vicinity of the former PCE AST (Tank 1). PCE concentrations decreased with increasing distance from the AST. PCE was also detected in the vicinity of another PCE AST (Tank 2) located in the alley behind the main building.
In August 1993, four boreholes were continuously cored in the vicinity of the PCE impacts detected during the May 1993 soil gas survey. PCE and TCE were detected in soil samples. The f our boreholes were subsequently converted into vapor extraction wells. The vapor extraction system operated for six months until VOC concentrations reached asymptotic levels.
The former IERC facility is located within the San Fernando Valley Superfund Site s Area 1: Burbank Operable Unit ( United States Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] , 2013). Groundwater within Area 1 is contaminated with VOCs, primarily PCE and TCE, total chromium, and hexavalent chromium.
Groundwater in the area is designated as shall ow and deep. A plume indicating chromium-impacted water is depicted in the shallow zone in the vicinity of the site. PCE and TCE plumes are depicted in the shallow and deeper groundwater zones in the vicinity of the site (EPA, 2013).
Between July 21 and Ju ly 23, 2014, a total of four soil borings were advanced in the vicinity of two clarifiers and two chemical storage areas. One additional soil boring was advanced to obtain background information about the nearby subsurface.
The soil samples were analyzed f or Title 22 metals and hexavalent chromium by EPA Methods 6010B, 7471A, and 7199. Hexavalent chromium was not detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit in any of the soil samples analyzed. Total chromium was detected in each of the soil samples but at concentrations well below the Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC); the highest total chromium was reported in SB-4-5 (5 feet bgs) at 36.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Reportedly, n one of the collected soil samples contained concentrations of other metals at or above the TTLC.
Based on Dudek’s evaluation of the data, Dudek stated that it does not appear that a release of hexavalent chromium or any other heavy metals occurred at the site.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-363
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 6
5.2.3 Yorke Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (2019) The Yorke Phase I ESA stated that the 1938 aerial photo appears to depict the current Burbank Western Channel (formerly known as the Burbank Western Wash) in its natural state and flowing directly through the northern parcel and through the current BWP Campus area (southern parcel). By 1940 the area of the southern parcel has some disturbance, but it is not clear what activity is occurring.
The Yorke report refers to a Phase I ESA conducted by URS Corporation in 2000 and stated that based on the long history o f hazardous materials used throughout the Campus, and the presence of a “historical dumping area” (which appears to likely refer to filling the original Burbank Western Channel section which ran through the Campus), the report concluded that there was a ge neral potential for petroleum product and/or hazardous chemical releases which might have produced subsurface impacts.
However, Yorke stated that they did not identify any recognized environmental concern (RECs) at the on-site southern parcel, and no contr olled RECs or historic RECs were identified for the southern parcel of the site . Yorke also stated that de minimis conditions were identified at the southern parcel, consisting of minor paved surface staining and a historical acid spill, that may have resulted in minor impacts to subsurface soils.
Regarding the off-site northern parcel, Yorke stated that a REC was identified based on known releases to soil and soil gas that occurred at a former electronics manufacturing facility which occupied the abutting properties to the southwest and north -northwest.
Yorke also stated that t hese releases suggest ed the possibility of intrusion of contaminated soil gas/vapors onto the northern parcel.
5.2.4 MNS Engineering Offsite and Onsite Improvement Plans (2020) Ninyo & Moor e reviewed a set of Storm Water Improvement Project plans (60% Draft – Not for Construction), dated June 2020.
Sheet G -02 provided a summary of the planned on - and off -site work. The on-site southern parcel work consists of modifications to the storm drai n piping of the BWP campus to redirect the storm water which currently discharges to the BWFCC outfall into a new 280,000 -gallon underground storage facility. From this point , stormwater will be transferred by pumping and used in the adjacent onsite cooling towers or infiltrated into the ground. Sheet C -03 depicted a plan view of the proposed onsite improvements and Sheet C-05 showed a profile of the proposed vault sections.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-364
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 7
The off -site northern parcel work consists of construction of storm drain pipelines , manholes, and inlets in the City of Burbank in West Magnolia Boulevard and North Varney Street. The work will redirect stormwater currently directed onto the BWP campus offsite to a new connection for discharge to the BWFCC at North Varney Street.
Sheet C-02 showed a plan and profile of the proposed offsite storm water pipeline.
These drawings were used to help select our proposed soil boring locations. 6 PHYSICAL SETTING
The following sections include discussions of topographic, geologic, and hydrogeologic conditions in the site vicinity.
6.1 Topography
Based on a review of the United States Geological Survey, Burbank, California, 7.5 -minute quadrangle map ( 2018), the site is situated at an elevation of approximately 560 to 570 feet above mean sea level. Both parcels slope slightly to the southeast.
6.2 Geology and Site Geology
The site is located within the Transverse Ranges Geomorphic Province. Locally, the site is situated within the San Fernando Valley. The San Fernando Valley is bound to the north by the San G abriel and Santa Susana Mountains, to the west by the Simi Hills, to the east by the Verdugo Mountains and San Rafael Hills, and to the south by the Santa Monica Mountains (United States Geological Survey, 2018).
A geotechnical investigation performed by Oakridge Geoscience (OG) on the southern parcel in March of 2018 summarized several previous subsurface investigations, as well as reported on the results of several test borings they installed. The investigations were consistent with the generalized geology of the area, which is a coastal valley partially filled with alluvial materials.
These materials consist of interbedded fine -grained sediments with some sand and gravel deposits, to a depth of at least 100 feet (Yorke, 2019).
Based on soil encountered in borings during the current Phase II ESA , soil in the southern parcel area generally consisted of fill material comprised of gravel and cobble in a brown, dry, loose silt to a depth of approximately five feet bgs in 12 borings (B11 to B22) . Brick fragments were observed in three borings (B13 to B15). Concrete debris was observed in boring B14. This fill material may be from “filling” the original Burbank Western Channel section that ran through the southern parcel area. Beneath the fill material an alluvium consisting of silt, clay, and silty sand was ATTACHMENT 2
A2-365
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 8
encountered to approximately 21 feet bgs, the maximum depth explored. Copies of the boring logs are provided in Appendix A.
6.3 Groundwater
The site is located within the San Fernando Valley groundwater basin. The basin is bounded on the north and northwest by the Santa Susana Mountains, on the north and northeast by the San Gabriel Mountains, on the east by the San Rafael Hills, on the south by the Santa Monica Mountains and Chalk Hills, and on the west by the Simi Hills. The valley is drained by the Los Angeles River and its tributaries (California Department of Water Resources, 2004).
The water-bearing sediments consist of the lower Pleistocene Saugus Formation, Pleistocene and Holocene age alluvium. The ground -water in this basin is mainly unconfined with some confinement within the Saugus Formation in the western part of the basin and in the Sylmar and Eagle Rock areas (CSWRB, 1962).
The 2018 OG report indicated that a Los Angeles County -owned well located some 3 ,000 feet west of the southern parcel has reported a groundwater depth of approximately 80 feet bgs (Yorke, 2019).
During the current Limited Phase II ESA, groundwater was not encountered in the soil borings to a maximum depth explored of approximately 21 feet bgs. Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors such as water extraction. 7 FIELD ACTIVITIES
The following sections summarize the environm ental site assessment activities conducted by Ninyo & Moore.
7.1 Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan
Prior to implementing the field evaluation, the site -specific Health and Safety Plan (HSP) was updated and kept onsite for the duration of the fieldwork. The HSP provided a site -specific scope of work and reported the suspected constituents of concern that may be present at the site. Prior to the initiation of field activities, a site -safety briefing was conducted to evaluate potential physical and chemical haz ards and outlined measures to be taken in the event of an emergency. On-site personnel signed the safety form acknowledging their participation in the briefing.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-366
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 9
7.2 Permits
Ninyo & Moore acquired a City of Burbank , Public Works Department Offsite Excavation P ermit (OEP) to allow for drilling in the off -site northern parcel area. A copy of OEP No. PW2008220 is provided in Appendix B. A Work Plan Approval (WPA) permit was acquired from the County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Health. A copy of the WPA per mit number SR0231199 is provided in Appendix C. In addition, Ninyo & Moore coordinated safety training and site access with BWP.
7.3 Notifications
Ninyo & Moore notified Underground Service Alert on July 13, 2020 , of the intended drilling, a minimum of 72 hours prior to beginning fieldwork. Other notifications included:
• City of Burbank Department of Water and Power
• City of Burbank Department of Public Works
• City of Burbank Police Department, Traffic Division
• City of Burbank Transportation Management Center
• County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health
7.4 Soil Boring Locations
Twenty-two soil borings (B1 to B22) were advanced to evaluate the current subsurface conditions present in soil as a result of previous contamination found at the site based on a Phase II ESA that was conducted in 2001 at the BWP facility. From August 24 to 26, 2020 , fourteen borings (B9 to B22) were drilled in the southern parcel. Eight borings (B1 to B8 ) were drilled in the northern parcel from September 22 to September 23, 2020. Soil boring locations are shown on Figure s 2 and 3.
Field activities included advancing twenty-two soil borings (B1 to B 22) and the collection of soil samples. Photographs of the field activities conducted during this SSI are presented in Appendix D. Field sampli ng procedures are described in Appendix E. The ESA activities were conducted under the guidance of a Ninyo & Moore California-licensed Professional Geologist.
7.5 Underground Service Alert and Geophysical Survey s
Prior to the commencement of the soil sampling activities, the proposed soil boring locations were marked and identified with white spray paint or with flags in the proposed locations.
Underground Service Alert of Southern California was notified of the intent to conduct the subsurface evaluation activities at least 48 hours prior to the initiation of intrusive field tasks. On ATTACHMENT 2
A2-367
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 10
August 18, 2020, DigAlert Ticket numbers (A202311094 and A202311058) were obtained for the on-site south parcel and off-site north parcel, respectively.
On August 24, 2020, Subsurface Survey, Inc. conducted a geophysical survey to evaluate the proposed soil boring locations with respect to potential buried utilities , other subsurface anomalies or obstructions , and suspected sewer lines in the on-site southern parcel . A geophysical survey was conducted on September 22, 2020 , for the off-site northern parcel. A combination of electromagnetic induction, magnetometry, and ground penetrating radar were utilized. No subsurface conflicts were identified in the surveys. Copies of the geophy sical survey reports are provided in Appendix F.
7.6 Drilling and Soil Sampling
Ninyo & Moore provided oversight of InterPhase Environmental, Inc. (InterPhase) of Commerce, California, a C -57-licensed drilling contractor, from August 24 to 26, 2020 , for the drilling and sampling of the 14 southern parcel borings to a depth of approximately 21 feet bgs feet bgs.
From September 22 to 23, 2020 Ninyo & Moore observed the drilling and sampling of the 8 off - site north parcel borings to a dep th of approximately 21 feet bgs. For both parcels, 4-inch diameter borings were first advanced using hand auger methods from below the pavement or from the surface to approximately 5 feet bgs. The borings were then advanced to their total depth using a Geoprobe 6600 direct-push truck-mounted drill rig.
7.6.1 Soil Sampling Procedures
Soil samples were collected at 5 -foot intervals using a 2.25 -inch diameter stainless steel sampler lined with acetate sleeves. Upon retrieving the sampler from the borehole, the selected soil sample was cut i nto 6 -inch length interval, covered on both ends by Teflon™ sheeting, sealed with plastic end caps, labeled and placed into a cooler with ice. Samples were transferred under chain -of-custody procedures to Asset Laboratories (Asset), a state-certified laboratory, for analytical testing.
Each boring was continuously logged. Soil samples were observed and logged in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Soil descriptions, sample type and depth, texture, color, density or consistency, od or, moisture content, and related drilling information were recorded on the boring logs (Appendix A).
Each soil sample collected from borings was monitored for VOCs using a hexane - calibrated Mini -Rae 3000 photo -ionization detector (PID). A portion of the soil sample was placed in a Ziploc TM bag, agitated, and set aside for approximately 15 to 30 minutes ATTACHMENT 2
A2-368
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 11
to allow organic vapors, if present, to accumulate in the void space of the bag. Readings from the PID were used to provide a field evaluation of the prese nce and relative concentrations of VOCs in soil. PID measurements were also recorded on the boring logs. PID readings ranged from 0. 0 to 4.2 parts per million (ppm) in the on -site south parcel and from 0. 1 to 29.8 ppm (in sample B5 -21) in the off -site north parcel. Soil samples to be analyzed were selected based on elevated PID readings. Two sampling intervals with the highest photo-ionization detector (PID) readings from each boring were selected for laboratory analysis. If elevated PID readings were not encountered, then the 5-foot soil sample was submitted for analysis.
7.7 Decontamination Procedures
Equipment coming into contact with potentially contaminated soil was decontaminated before and between each sample location to preserve the quality of samples c ollected as specified in the field procedures (Appendix E).
7.8 Investigation -Derived Waste Management
Single-use equipment/items, such as gloves, were disposed of as municipal waste. Soil cuttings and decontamination water were containerized in Department of Transportation-compliant 55 - gallon steel drums, labeled appropriately, and stored in a secure location pending waste characterization and removal from the site by a licensed waste disposal contractor. Copies of waste manifests, when received from the disposal facility, will be provided under separate cover. 8 ANALYTICAL TESTING
Forty-four soil samples and two waste characterization samples were submitted to Asset Laboratories (Asset) , a California -certified laboratory for the analysis of Title 22 metals in accordance with EPA Method 6010B/7471A; TPH as carbon chain in accordance with EPA Method 8015; and VOCs in accordance with EPA Method 8260B/5035. 9 FIELD VARIANCE/QUALI TY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
Deviations from the sampling and analysis plan are as the follows:
• Following the geophysical survey on July 16, 2020, the final locations of the following borings were adjusted prior to drilling:
o B1 was moved approximately 3 feet west from an unknown line. o B9 was moved approximately 6 feet west from a bridge footing.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-369
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 12
Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures were performed during field activ ities. These procedures include evaluating that field work was conducted in accordance with the proposal dated July 31, 2020. Analytical reports were reviewed with respect to the quality of the data and conformance with holding times and reporting proc edures. No qualifiers or deviations were identified in the analytical laboratory reports. It is Ninyo & Moore’s opinion that the data developed during this Limited Phase II ESA is usable.
10 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Soil analytical results are summarized in Tables 1 through 3. Analytical results were compared to the EPA Region 9 Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) for industrial soil (EPA, May 2020), the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) Screening Levels (SLs) assuming industrial land use (DTSC, 2020), San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) (January 2019, Revision 2) and hazardous waste cr iteria, as applicable. Copies of the laboratory analytical report and chain-of-custody documentation are included in Appendix G.
10.1 Soil Analytical Results
10.1.1 Title 22 Metals
Soil analytical results for Title 22 Metals are shown in Table 1. Arsenic exceeded the industrial EPA RSL, DTSC Human and Ecological Risk Office Human Health Risk Assessment ( HERO HHRA ) and Regional Water Quality Control Board Environmental Screening Levels ( RWQCB ESL ) in 44 samples. Arsenic did not exceed the DTSC acceptable clean up level of 12 mg/kg (DTSC, 2008) in the collected soil samples.
One soil sample, B18-5 in the southern parcel contained lead at a concentration of 330 mg/kg, which exceeds the industrial DTSC Hero HHRA and RWQCB ESL of 320 mg/kg.
Soluble lead was analyzed for sol uble threshold limit concentration (STLC) for sample B18-5 and was reported as non -detect (ND) <1.2 milligrams per liter (mg/l). Leachable lead was analyzed for toxicity characteristic lea ching procedure (TCLP) in sample B18-5 and was reported as ND <1.2 mg/l. These concentrations do not exceed the 5 mg/l California or federal hazardous waste criteria for waste characterization.
Other metals did not exceed their respective screening levels.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-370
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 13
10.1.2 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
The soil analytical results for TPH are presented in Table 2. Soil sample B20 -5 in the southern parcel had a TPH diesel range organics (DRO) concentration of 570 mg/kg, which exceeds the EPA RSL and DTSC HHRA industrial screening level of 560 mg/kg; however, this concentration did not e xceed the RWQCB ESL of 1,200 mg/kg. Sample B20-21 did not have any TPH concentrations detected above laboratory reporting limits or industrial screening levels. Other TPH DRO samples did not exceed their respective industrial screening levels.
TPH gas rang e organics and TPH motor oil range organics were not detected at concentrations above their respective industrial screening levels.
10.1.3 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)
The soil analytical results of VOCs are summarized in Table 3. Soil sample B6 -5 in the northern parcel exhibited the only detectable VOC, a PCE concentration of 59 ug/kg.
This value does not exceed the EPA RSL , DTSC HHRA or RWQCB ESL industrial screening levels of 100, 2,700 or 2,700 ug/kg, respectively. Sample B6-21 did not exhibit a PCE concentration above laboratory reporting limits . Other VOCs were not detected above their respective laboratory reporting limit or industrial screening levels. 11 DISCUSSION
The results of the limited Phase II ESA are discussed below.
11.1 Soil
11.1.1 Title 22 Metals
Sample B18 -5 in the on -site southern parcel contained lead at a concentration of 330 mg/kg and exceeded the industrial DTSC Hero HHRA and RWQCB ESL of 320 mg/kg. However, the STLC and TCLP concentrations were not detected and do not exceed the 5 mg/l Californi a or federal hazardous waste criteria for waste characterization. Based on these results, the waste was classified as non -hazardous.
Sample B18-10 contained lead at a concentration of 1.9 mg/kg , and is classified as non - hazardous. It appears that lead impa cts are limited to approximately 5 feet bgs at B18.
The lateral extent of any potential lead impacted soil in the vicinity of boring B18 has not been defined. Additional lead impacted soil may be present around boring B18.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-371
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 14
11.1.2 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
Soil sample B20 -5 in the on -site southern parcel had a TPH DRO concentration of 570 mg/kg, which slightly exceeds the EPA RSL and DTSC HHRA in dustrial screening level of 560 mg/kg. The lateral extent of DRO impacted soil around boring B20 has not been defined. Additional DRO impacted soil may be present around boring B20.
11.1.3 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
VOCs were analyzed using EPA Method 8260B and were not detected in soil above their respective industrial screening levels (Table 3). However, VOC impacted soil s may be present around boring B6 and vicinity during soil excavation. 12 CONCLUSIONS AND RECO MMENDATIONS
The results of this limited Phase II ESA indicate the following:
• Lead in sample B18-5 and DRO in sample B20-5 located in the southern parcel were detected at concentrations exceeding their respective human health screening levels.
Neither of these concentrations classifies the material as a hazardous waste and the lead concentration in sample B18-5 was further verified as non-hazardous by a second waste characterization analysis. Given the very slight exceedances of relevant action levels only for these two constituents in all samples analyzed, the soil does not appear to represent a material human health threat to a construction worker. Again, given the minimal concentrations detected, the soil also does not appear unsuitable for re-use as backfill material. For purposes of off-site disposal, all analytical data from soil samples representing excavated soil should be provided to a prospective disposal facility to assure that the disposal facility can compare it against its acceptance criteria. • Based on soil types encountered in borings, soil in the southern parcel area generally consisted of fill material comprised of gravel and cobble in a brown, dry, loose silt to a maximum depth of approximately five feet bgs in 12 borings (B11 to B22). Brick fragments were observed in three borings (B13 to B15). Concrete debris was observed in boring B14.
This fill inert debris material may be from backfilling the original BWFCC section that ran through the southern parcel of the site. This fill material is not expected to have an environmental impact on the proposed project and should be removed during the modifications to the storm drain piping system. Beneath the fill material an alluvium consisting of silt, clay , and silty sand was encountered to approximately 21 feet bgs, the maximum depth explored.
• At samples B13-21, B14-21 and B20-2 1, which correspond to the planned lower depth of the excavation for the storm water infiltration facility , there were no exceedances of regulatory screening criteria for metals, TPH or VOCs. This finding suggests a low potential for contaminant leaching from soil due to storm water infiltration. • Based on the Limited Phase II ESA findings, Ninyo & Moore recommends preparing a Soil Management Plan (SMP) to address the possibility of encountering areas containing DRO- or lead-impacted soils during excavation of the on-site southern parcel and to monitor excavated soils for VOCs during SWIP project construction in the northern parcel. The SMP should be prepared by a qualified environmental consultant and implemented during soil disturbance activities under the oversight of an environmental professional. The SMP will address monitoring of excavated soil, community and construction worker health and safety, and soil handling, stockpiling, characterization, on-site reuse, export, and disposal protocols as appropriate.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-372
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 15
13 LIMITATIONS
The environmental services described in this report h ave been conducted in general accordance with current regulatory guidelines and the standard -of-care exercised by environmental consultants performing similar work in the project area. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the professional o pinions presented in this report. Variations in site conditions may e xist and conditions not observed or described in this report may be encountered during subs equent activities. Please also note that this study did not include an evaluation of geotechnical conditions or potential geologic hazards.
Ninyo & Moore's opinions and recommendations regarding environmental conditions, as presented in this report, are based on limited subsurface assessment and chemical analysis.
Further assessment of potential adverse environmental impacts from past on -site and/or nearby use of hazardous materials may be accomplished by a more comprehensive assessment. The samples collected and used for testing, and the observations made, are believed to be representative of the are a(s) evalua ted; however, conditions can vary significantly between sampling locations. Variations in soil and/or groundwater conditions will exist beyond the points explored in this evaluation.
The environmental interpretations and opinions contained in this report are based on the results of laboratory tests and analyses intended to detect the presence and concentration of specific chemical or physical constituents in samples collected from the site. The testing and analyses have been conducted by an independent laboratory which is certified by the State of California to conduct such tests. Ninyo & Moore has no involvement in, or control over, such testing and analysis. Ninyo & Moore, therefore, disclaims responsibility for any inaccuracy in such laboratory results.
Our conclusions, recommendations, and opinions are based on an analysis of the observed site conditions. It should be understood that the conditions of a site could change with time as a result of natural processes or the activities of man at the site or nearby sites. In addition, changes to the applicable laws, regulations, codes, and standards of practice may occur due to government action or the broadening of knowledge. The findings of this report may, therefore, be invalidated over time, in pa rt or in whole, by changes over which Ninyo & Moore has no control.
This document is intended to be used only in its entirety. No portion of the document, by itself, is designed to completely represent any aspect of the project described herein. Ninyo & Mo ore ATTACHMENT 2
A2-373
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 16
should be contacted if the reader requires any additional information, or has questions regarding content, interpretations presented, or completeness of this document.
This report is intended exclusively for use by the client. Any use or reuse of the f indings, conclusions, and/or recommendations of this report by parties other than the client is undertaken at said parties’ sole risk.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-374
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 17
14 REFERENCES
California Department of Toxic Substances Control, 2004, Guidance Document for the Implementation of United S tates Environmental Protection Agency Method 5035:
Methodologies for Collection, Preservation, Storage, and Preparation of Soils to be Analyzed for Volatile Organic Compounds, dated November.
California Department of Toxic Substances Control, 2008, Determi nation of a Southern California Regional Background Arsenic Concentration in Soil, dated June California Department of Toxic Substances Control, 20 20, Human Health Risk Assessment Human and Ecological Risk Office Note 3, Recommended Screening Levels, dated June.
California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) , 2004, Groundwater Bulletin 118, South Coast Hydrologic Region, San Fernando Valley Groundwater Basin, dated February 27.
California State Water Rights Board (SWRB). 1962. Report of Referee: The City o f Los Angeles vs. City of San Fernando et al.
DTSC, see California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Dudek, 2014. Former International Electronic Research Corporation Facility, Subsurface Soil Investigation Report, August.
EPA, 2013, http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/sfund/r9sfdocw.nsf/webdisplay/oidec677763ed184 f09882 5660b007ee66b? OpenDocument. Accessed May 29
MNS Engineering, Inc., 2020. Offsite and Onsite Improvement Plans, 60% Draft – Not for Construction, City of Burbank Department of Water and Power , Storm Water Improvement Project, June.
RWQCB, see San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board.
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, 2019, Environmental Screening Levels, dated January.
URS, 2000. Phase I Environmental Assess ment, Burbank Magnolia Power Plant, Burbank, California, December.
URS, 2001. Limited Phase II Environmental Assessment, Burbank Magnolia Power Plant, Burbank, California, August.
United States Geological Survey, 201 8, Burbank Quadrangle, California: 7.5 -minute series (topographic), Scale 1:24,000.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 20 20, Regional Screening Level (RSL) Summary Table (TR=1E-06, HQ-1), dated May.
Yorke Engineering, LLC, 2019. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Burbank Water an d Power, Storm Water Improvement Project, Burbank, CA, May.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-375
Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium C admium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead Lead STLC (mg/L)
Lead TCLP
(mg/L) Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc B1-5 5 9/22/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 210 ND<1. 0 ND<1.0 31 17 32 3.0 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 25 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 66 64 B1-21 21 9/22/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 170 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 23 14 29 3.5 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 17 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 52 53 B2-5 5 9/22/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 190 ND<1. 0 ND<1.0 27 16 32 2.8 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 21 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 59 57 B2-10 10 9/22/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 150 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 22 14 25 1.9 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 16 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 57 46 B3-15 15 9/22/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 170 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 25 15 25 2.0 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 18 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 59 52 B3-21 21 9/22/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 140 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 24 13 25 2.0 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 18 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 58 48 B4-5 5 9/22/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 180 ND<1. 0 ND<1.0 26 16 29 2.9 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 19 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 60 56 B4-10 10 9/22/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 140 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 22 12 23 2.0 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 16 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 52 45 B5-15 15 9/23/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 150 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 25 14 26 2.3 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 17 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 59 51 B5-21 21 9/23/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 120 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 18 11 14 3.0 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 12 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 46 44 B6-5 5 9/23/2020 ND<2.0 1.7 93 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 12 6.6 11 3.6 -- -- ND<0.10 ND<1.0 8.6 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 29 47 B6-21 21 9/23/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 110 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 15 9.4 12 2.6 -- -- ND<0.10 ND<1.0 11 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 39 39 B7-10 10 9/23/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 160 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 36 14 26 3.5 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 18 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 55 63 B7-15 15 9/23/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 160 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 26 14 25 2.8 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 18 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 58 57 B8-5 5 9/23/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 130 ND<1. 0 ND<1.0 20 11 22 15 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 13 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 51 63 B8-10 10 9/23/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 180 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 23 14 25 3.4 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 16 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 52 58 B9-5 5 8/24/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 160 ND<1. 0 ND<1.0 23 15 26 12 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 17 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 54 71 B9-15 15 8/24/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 240 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 29 19 35 2.8 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 23 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 67 66 B10-10 10 8/24/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 150 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 21 14 24 6.9 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 16 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 52 55 B10-21 21 8/24/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 71 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 7.6 6.4 7.6 ND<1.0 -- -- ND<0.099 ND<1.0 4.8 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 25 19 B11-15 15 8/26/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 250 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 34 19 36 3.0 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 23 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 74 72 B11-21 21 8/26/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 150 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 22 15 22 3.3 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 16 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 53 50 B12-5 5 8/24/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 150 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 21 14 23 4.9 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 16 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 49 56 B12-15 15 8/24/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 230 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 29 18 34 2.6 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 22 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 66 64 B13-10 10 8/25/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 100 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 13 8.8 14 1.1 -- -- ND<0.10 ND<1.0 9.6 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 33 34 B13-21 21 8/25/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 96 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 17 10 15 1.8 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 10 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 43 41 B14-15 15 8/25/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 210 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 27 17 30 2.4 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 21 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 62 61 B14-21 21 8/25/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 130 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 17 12 17 2.5 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 13 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 45 46 B15-5 5 8/24/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 40 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 5.1 4.1 4.4 ND<1.0 -- -- ND<0.10 ND<1.0 3.2 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 16 16 B15-10 10 8/24/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 150 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 23 14 23 1.6 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 17 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 54 50 B16-5 5 8/26/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 130 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 16 10 20 24 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 11 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 52 49 B16-15 15 8/26/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 210 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 32 20 37 3.3 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 24 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 75 73 B17-5 5 8/26/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 97 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 14 8.6 13 5.4 - - -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 9.3 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 35 41 B17-15 15 8/26/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 230 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 33 21 38 3.2 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 24 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 74 75 B18-5 5 8/26/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 4 9 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 8.3 5.1 6.9 330 ND<1.2 ND<0.050 ND<0.10 ND<1.0 4.7 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 21 34 B18-10 10 8/26/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 230 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 33 18 32 1.9 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 22 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 74 66 B19-5 5 8/26/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 110 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 19 9.9 17 14 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 10 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 43 49 B19-10 10 8/26/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 25 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 4.9 3.0 4.4 ND<1.0 -- -- ND<0.099 ND<1.0 3.0 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 15 14 B20-5 5 8/25/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 110 ND<1. 0 ND<1.0 18 9.1 14 2 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 14 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 45 37 B20-21 21 8/25/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 110 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 15 10 12 1.9 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 9.4 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 37 40 B21-10 10 8/25/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 150 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 25 15 26 1.6 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 17 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 58 54 B21-15 15 8/25/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 210 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 27 17 31 3 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 21 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 62 61 B22-5 5 8/25/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 100 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 13 9.2 14 2.1 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 11 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 43 36 B22-10 10 8/25/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 140 ND< 1.0 ND<1.0 22 13 21 1.6 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 15 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 52 46 WC NA 8/26/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 160 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 22 14 22 4.6 -- -- ND<0.099 ND< 1.0 16 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 56 54 WC NA 9/23/2020 ND<2.0 ND<1.0 150 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 25 13 24 16 -- -- ND<0.10 ND< 1.0 16 ND<1.0 ND<1.0 ND<2.0 56 66 EPA RSLs (Industrial Soil) 470* 3 220,000* 2,300* 980* 1,800,000*b 350* 47,000* 800* NL NL 46* 5,800* 22,000* 5,800* 5,800* 12* 5,800* 350,000* DTSC HERO HHRA (Industrial Soil) NL 0.36 NL 230* 4,000a NL NL NL 320* NL NL 4.4* NL 11,000* NL NL NL NL NL DTSC Acceptable Clean Up Levels NA 12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA San Francisco Bay RWQCB ESLs (Industrial Soil) 160* 0.31 220,000* 230* 1,100*a 1,800,000*b 350* 47,000* 320* NL NL 190* 5,800* 11,000* 5,800* 5,800* 12* 5,800* 350,000* TCLP (mg/l) NL 5.0 100 NL 1.0 5 NL NL 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.2 NL NL 1.0 5 NL NL NL 15 5.0 100 0.75 1.0 5 50 25 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.2 350 20 1.0 5 7.0 24 250 Notes:
bold indicates exceedance of regulatory screening level(s) a - Cadmium diet
b - Chromium III
* - non-cancer endpoint
** - excluding barium sulfate
-- not analyzed
bgs - below ground surface
DTSC Acceptable Clean Up Levels- DTSC's Determination of a Southern California Regional Background Arsenic concentrations in so il (March 2008) DTSC HERO HHRA - Department of Toxic Substances Control Human and Ecological Risk Office Human Health Risk Assessment, Note 3, Recommended Screening Levels for Soil (June 2020) EPA - United States Environmental Protection Agency
ESLs - San Francisco Bay RWQCB Environmental Screening Levels (January 2019) ID - Identification
mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram
mg/L - milligrams per liter
NA - not applicable
ND< - not detected above the laboratory reporting limit NL - not listed
RSLs - United States Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels (May 2020) STLC - soluble threshold limit concentration
TCLP - toxicity characteristic leaching procedure
WC -waste characterization sample
Table 1 – Soil Sample Analytical Results – Title 22 Metals Sample ID
Date
Sample
Collected
EPA Method 6010B/7471A (mg/kg)
STLC (mg/l)
Regulatory Screening Levels (mg/kg)
Waste Characterization Sample (mg/kg)
Hazardous Waste Criteria
Sample
Depth
(feet bgs)
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-376
Table 2 – Soil Sample Analytical Results – TPHs
GROs DROs OROs
B1-5 5 9/22/2020 ND<0.93 ND<10 ND<10
B1-21 21 9/22/2020 ND<0.86 ND<10 ND<10
B2-5 5 9/22/2020 ND<0.89 ND<10 ND<10
B2-10 10 9/22/2020 ND<0.82 ND<10 ND<10
B3-15 15 9/22/2020 ND<0.94 ND<10 ND<10
B3-21 21 9/22/2020 ND<0.82 ND<10 ND<10
B4-5 5 9/22/2020 ND<0.94 28 100
B4-10 10 9/22/2020 ND<0.93 ND<10 ND<10
B5-15 15 9/23/2020 ND<0.97 ND<10 ND<10
B5-21 21 9/23/2020 ND<0.97 ND<10 ND<10
B6-5 5 9/23/2020 ND<1.5 33 69
B6-21 21 9/23/2020 ND<1.1 ND<9.9 ND<9.9
B7-10 10 9/23/2020 ND<1.2 ND<10 ND<10
B7-15 15 9/23/2020 ND<1.1 ND<10 ND<10
B8-5 5 9/23/2020 ND<0.96 ND<10 19
B8-10 10 9/23/2020 ND<1.2 ND<10 ND<10
B9-5 5 8/24/2020 ND<0.94 62 120
B9-15 15 8/24/2020 ND<0.87 13 15
B10-10 10 8/24/2020 ND<0.96 ND<10 ND<10
B10-21 21 8/24/2020 ND<1.1 ND<10 ND<10
B11-15 15 8/26/2020 ND<0.83 ND<10 11
B11-21 21 8/26/2020 ND<0.88 ND<10 ND<10
B12-5 5 8/24/2020 ND<0.91 13 16
B12-15 15 8/24/2020 ND<0.83 11 14
B13-10 10 8/25/2020 ND<1.0 ND<9.9 ND<9.9
B13-21 21 8/25/2020 ND<0.85 ND<10 ND<10
B14-15 15 8/25/2020 ND<0.87 ND<10 ND<10
B14-21 21 8/25/2020 ND<0.85 ND<9.9 ND<9.9
B15-5 5 8/24/2020 ND<1.1 15 17
B15-10 10 8/24/2020 ND<0.94 ND<10 11
B16-5 5 8/26/2020 ND<1.1 57 140
B16-15 15 8/26/2020 ND<0.86 17 13
B17-5 5 8/26/2020 ND<0.93 30 37
B17-15 15 8/26/2020 ND<0.96 ND<10 ND<10
B18-5 5 8/26/2020 ND<1.1 ND<10 ND<10
B18-10 10 8/26/2020 ND<0.87 ND<10 ND<10
B19-5 5 8/26/2020 ND<0.96 140 310
B19-10 10 8/26/2020 ND<0.89 ND<9.9 ND<9.9
B20-5 5 8/25/2020 ND<0.94 570 800
B20-21 21 8/25/2020 ND<1.2 ND<9.9 ND<9.9
B21-10 10 8/25/2020 ND<0.87 13 12
B21-15 15 8/25/2020 ND<0.95 ND<10 ND<10
B22-5 5 8/25/2020 ND<0.94 ND<9.9 ND<9.9
B22-10 10 8/25/2020 ND<0.95 ND<10 ND<10
WC NA 8/26/2020 ND<1.0 25 52
WC NA 9/23/2020 ND<1.0 35 53
EPA RSLs (Industrial Soil) 420* 560* 30,000*
DTSC HERO HHRA (Industrial Soil) NL 500* 18,000*
San Francisco Bay RWQCB ESLs (Industrial Soil) 2,000* 1,200* 180,000* Notes:
bold indicates exceedance of regulatory screening level(s) * non-cancer endpoint
bgs - below ground surface
DRO - diesel range organics
EPA - United States Environmental Protection Agency
ESLs - San Francisco Bay RWQCB Environmental Screening Levels, (January 2019) GRO - gasoline range organics
ID - Identification
mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram
ND< - not detected above the laboratory reporting limit NL - not listed
RSLs - United States Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels (May 2020) ORO - motor oil ran
ge organics
TPHs - total petroleum hydrocarbons
WC - waste characterization sample
Regulatory Screening Levels (mg/kg)
DTSC HERO HHRA - Department of Toxic Substances Control Human and Ecological Risk Office Human Health Risk Assessment, Note 3, Recommended Screening Levels for Soil (June Sample ID Sample Depth
(feet bgs) Date Sample Collected TPHs EPA Method 8015B (mg/kg) Waste Characterization Sample (mg/kg)
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-377
Tetrachloroethene Other VOCs
B1-5 5 9/22/2020 ND<4.3 ND
B1-21 21 9/22/2020 ND<4.0 ND
B2-5 5 9/22/2020 ND<4.9 ND
B2-10 10 9/22/2020 ND<4.2 ND
B3-15 15 9/22/2020 ND<4.9 ND
B3-21 21 9/22/2020 ND<4.7 ND
B4-5 5 9/22/2020 ND<5.0 ND
B4-10 10 9/22/2020 ND<5.1 ND
B5-15 15 9/23/2020 ND<5.1 ND
B5-21 21 9/23/2020 ND<5.0 ND
B6-5 5 9/23/2020 59 ND
B6-21 21 9/23/2020 ND<6.2 ND
B7-10 10 9/23/2020 ND<5.0 ND
B7-15 15 9/23/2020 ND<7.3 ND
B8-5 5 9/23/2020 ND<5.0 ND
B8-10 10 9/23/2020 ND<8.4 ND
B9-5 5 8/24/2020 ND<4.6 ND
B9-15 15 8/24/2020 ND<4.1 ND
B10-10 10 8/24/2020 ND<4.5 ND
B10-21 21 8/24/2020 ND<5.7 ND
B11-15 15 8/26/2020 ND<4.6 ND
B11-21 21 8/26/2020 ND<4.1 ND
B12-5 5 8/24/2020 ND<4.4 ND
B12-15 15 8/24/2020 ND<4.1 ND
B13-10 10 8/25/2020 ND<5.1 ND
B13-21 21 8/25/2020 ND<4.4 ND
B14-15 15 8/25/2020 ND<4.7 ND
B14-21 21 8/25/2020 ND<4.6 ND
B15-5 5 8/24/2020 ND<6.6 ND
B15-10 10 8/24/2020 ND<5.6 ND
B16-5 5 8/26/2020 ND<4.3 ND
B16-15 15 8/26/2020 ND<4.4 ND
B17-5 5 8/26/2020 ND<4.4 ND
B17-15 15 8/26/2020 ND<4.5 ND
B18-5 5 8/26/2020 ND<4.8 ND
B18-10 10 8/26/2020 ND<5.2 ND
B19-5 5 8/26/2020 ND<4.8 ND
B19-10 10 8/26/2020 ND<5.7 ND
B20-5 5 8/25/2020 ND<4.4 ND
B20-21 21 8/25/2020 ND<5.6 ND
B21-10 10 8/25/2020 ND<5.3 ND
B21-15 15 8/25/2020 ND<3.9 ND
Table 3 – Soil Sample Analytical Results – VOCs
Sample ID Sample Depth
(feet bgs)
Date
Sample
Collected
VOCs EPA Method 8260B (µg/kg)
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-378
Tetrachloroethene Other VOCs
Table 3 – Soil Sample Analytical Results – VOCs
Sample ID Sample Depth
(feet bgs)
Date
Sample
Collected
VOCs EPA Method 8260B (µg/kg)
B22-5 5 8/25/2020 ND<4.9 ND
B22-10 10 8/25/2020 ND<4.3 ND
WC NA 8/26/2020 ND<5.0 ND
WC NA 9/23/2020 ND<5.0 ND
100 Various
2,700 Various
San Francisco Bay RWQCB ESLs (Industrial Soil) 2,700 Various Notes:
µg/kg - micrograms per kilogram
* - non-cancer endpoint
bgs - below ground surface
EPA - United States Environmental Protection Agency
ESLs - San Francisco Bay RWQCB Environmental Screening Levels, January 2019 ID - Identification
NA - not applicable
ND< - not detected above the laboratory reporting limit NL - not listed
PAHs - polycyclic aromatic Hydrocarbons
RSLs- United States Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels, May 2020 WC - waste characterization
DTSC HERO HHRA - Department of Toxic Substances Control Human and Ecological Risk Office Human H ealth Risk Assessment, Note 3, Recommended Screening Levels for Soil, June 2020
DTSC HERO HHRA (Industrial Soil)
EPA RSLs (Industrial Soil)
Waste Characterization Sample (µg/kg)
Regulatory Screening Levels (µg/kg)
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 2 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-379
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020
Appendix A
Photographic Documentation
FIGURES
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-380
OFF-SITE
NORTH PARCEL
ON-SITE
SOUTH PARCEL
Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants
211491001_SL.dwg 11/11/2020 ( November 2020 ) GK, JDP
SITE LOCATION
FIGURE 1
NOTE: DIMENSIONS, DIRECTIONS AND LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. I REFERENCE: USGS, 2018. 0 FEET
2,000 4,000
CITY OF BURBANK MAGNOLIA POWER STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 164 WEST MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 I 11/20
N
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-381
B-21
B-13
B-14
B-15
B-16
B-17
B-19
B-18B-20
B-22
B-12
B-11
B-10B-9
211491001_C-03.dwg 11/11/2020 ( November 2020 ) GK, JDP NOTE: DIMENSIONS, DIRECTIONS AND LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. I REFERENCE: MNS ENGINEERS INC. 0 FEET
25 500
Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants
LEGEND
CITY OF BURBANK MAGNOLIA POWER STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 164 WEST MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 I 11/20
N
B-22
FIGURE 2
ON-SITE SOUTHERN PARCEL BORING LOCATIONS
SOIL BORING LOCATION DRILLED
AUGUST 24 TO 26, 2020
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-382
B-8
B-7
B-6 B-5
B-4 B-3 B-2
B-1
FORMER INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC RESEARCH
211491001_C-02.dwg 11/11/2020 ( November 2020 ) GK, JDP
OFF-SITE NORTHERN PARCEL BORING LOCATIONS
NOTE: DIMENSIONS, DIRECTIONS AND LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. I REFERENCE: MNS ENGINEERS INC. 0 FEET
50 1000
Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants
LEGEND
CITY OF BURBANK MAGNOLIA POWER STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 164 WEST MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 I 11/20
N
B-8 SOIL BORING LOCATION DRILLED
SEPTEMBER 22 TO 23, 2020
FIGURE 3
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-383
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020
APPENDIX A
Boring Logs
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-384
poil Classification Chart mer ASTM D 2488
Primary Divisions
Secondary Divisions
Group Symbol Group Name
COARSE-
GRAINED
SOILS
more than
50% retained
on No. 200
sieve
GRAVEL
more than
50% of
coarse
fraction
retained on
No. 4 sieve
CLEAN GRAVEL
���������
GW well-graded GRAVEL
GP poorly graded GRAVEL
GRAVEL with
DUAL
CLASSIFICATIONS
RB=to=NOB=fines
GW-GM well-graded GRAVEL with silt
GP-GM poorly graded GRAVEL with silt
GW-GC well-graded GRAVEL with clay
GP-GC poorly graded GRAVEL with clay
GRAVEL with
FINES
more than
NOB=fines
GM silty GRAVEL
GC clayey GRAVEL
GC-GM silty, clayey GRAVEL
SAND
50% or more
of coarse
fraction
passes
No. 4 sieve
CLEAN SAND
���������
SW well-graded SAND
SP poorly graded SAND
SAND with
DUAL
CLASSIFICATIONS
RB=to=NOB=fines
SW-SM well-graded SAND with silt
SP-SM poorly graded SAND with silt
SW-SC well-graded SAND with clay
SP-SC poorly graded SAND with clay
SAND with FINES
more than
NOB=fines
SM silty SAND
SC clayey SAND
SC-SM silty, clayey SAND
FINE-
GRAINED
SOILS
50% or
more passes
No. 200 sieve
SILT and
CLAY
liquid limit
less than 50%
INORGANIC
CL lean CLAY
ML SILT
CL-ML silty CLAY
ORGANIC
OL (PI > 4) organic CLAY
OL (PI < 4) organic SILT
SILT and
CLAY
liquid limit
50% or more
INORGANIC
CH fat CLAY
MH elastic SILT
ORGANIC
OH (plots on or
above “A”-line) organic CLAY
OH (plots
below “A”-line) organic SILT
Highly Organic Soils PT Peat
USCS METHOD OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION
Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultant s
Apparent Density - Coarse-Grained Soil
Apparent
Density
Spooling Cable or Cathead Automatic Trip Hammer
SPT
(blows/foot)
Modified
Split Barrel
(blows/foot)
SPT
(blows/foot)
Modified
Split Barrel
(blows/foot)
Very Loose < 4 < 8 < 3 < 5
Loose 5 - 10 9 - 21 4 - 7 6 - 14
Medium
Dense 11 - 30 22 - 63 8 - 20 15 - 42
Dense 31 - 50 64 - 105 21 - 33 43 - 70
Very Dense > 50 > 105 > 33 > 70
Consistency - Fine-Grained Soil
Consis-
tency
Spooling Cable or Cathead Automatic Trip Hammer
SPT
(blows/foot)
Modified
Split Barrel
(blows/foot)
SPT
(blows/foot)
Modified
Split Barrel
(blows/foot)
Very Soft < 2 < 3 < 1 < 2
Soft 2 - 4 3 - 5 1 - 3 2 - 3
Firm 5 - 8 6 - 10 4 - 5 4 - 6
ptiff 9 - 15 11 - 20 6 - 10 7 - 13
Very=ptiff 16 - 30 21 - 39 11 - 20 14 - 26
Hard > 30 > 39 > 20 > 26
LIQUID LIMIT (LL), %
PLASTICITY INDEX (PI), %
0 10
10 7
4 20
30 40
50 60
70 0
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
MH or OH
ML or OLCL - ML
Plasticity Chart
Grain Size
Description Sieve
Size Grain Size Approximate
Size
Boulders > 12” > 12” Larger than
basketball-sized
Cobbles 3 - 12” 3 - 12” Fist-sized to
basketball-sized
Gravel
Coarse 3/4 - 3” 3/4 - 3” Thumb-sized to
�����
Fine #4 - 3/4” 0.19 - 0.75” Pea-sized to
thumb-sized
Sand
Coarse #10 - #4 0.079 - 0.19” Rock-salt-sized to
pea-sized
Medium #40 - #10 0.017 - 0.079” Sugar-sized to
rock-salt-sized
Fine #200 - #40 0.0029 -
0.017”
Flour-sized to
sugar-sized
Fines Passing
#200 < 0.0029” Flour-sized and
smaller
CH or OH
CL or OL
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-385
0 5
10 15
20 XX/XX
SM
CL
Bulk sample.
Modified split-barrel drive sampler.
No recovery with modified split-barrel drive sampler.
Sample retained by others.
Standard Penetration Test (SPT).
No recovery with a SPT.
Shelby tube sample. Distance pushed in inches/length of sample recovered in inches.
No recovery with Shelby tube sampler.
Continuous Push Sample.
Seepage.
Groundwater encountered during drilling.
Groundwater measured after drilling.
MAJOR MATERIAL TYPE (SOIL):
Solid line denotes unit change.
Dashed line denotes material change.
Attitudes: Strike/Dip
b: Bedding
c: Contact
j: Joint
f: Fracture
F: Fault
cs: Clay Seam
s: Shear
bss: Basal Slide Surface
sf: Shear Fracture
sz: Shear Zone
sbs: Shear Bedding Surface
The total depth line is a solid line that is drawn at the bottom of the boring.
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
MOISTURE (%)
DRY DENSITY (PCF)
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
BORING LOG EXPLANATION SHEET
BORING LOG
20 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-386
0 10
20 30
40 B1-5/08:26
B1-10/08:26
B1-15/08:28
B1-21/08:40
0.6 0.5
0.1 1.1
ML
SC
SW
ML
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; few to little gravel; few cobbles; no odor.
ALLUVIUM:
Dark brown, dry, firm to stiff, sandy CLAY; few to little gravel; no odor.
Light brown, dry, loose, well-graded, SAND; no odor.
Brown, dry, loose, SILT; no odor.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 feet to surface. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 1
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 9/22/20 BORING NO. B1
GROUND ELEVATION 568' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-387
0 10
20 30
40 B2-5/09:39
B2-10/09:39
B12-15/09:42
B2-21/09:45
2.5 5.9
1.5 0.8
ML
SM
SW
CL
ASPHALT:
Approximately 4 inches thick.
FILL:
Dark brown, dry, soft, SILT; no odor.
ALLUVIUM:
Light brown, dry, loose, silty SAND; no odor.
Medium dense.
Dense.
Brown, dry, loose, well-graded, fine to coarse, SAND; no odor.
Brown, dry, stiff, CLAY; no odor.
Few to little sand.
No sand.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 1.5 feet.
Backfilled with 1-sack slurry from approximately 1.5 to 1 feet.
Capped with C2 PG6410 asphalt from 1 inch to surface.
4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 2
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 9/22/20 BORING NO. B2
GROUND ELEVATION 567' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-388
0 10
20 30
40 B3-5/10:38
B3-10/10:39
B3-15/10:40
B3-21/10:43
0.9 0.7
0.8 1.1
ML
SM
SW
CL
ASPHALT:
Approximately 4 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; no odor.
ALLUVIUM:
Light brown, dry, loose, silty SAND; no odor.
Dense.
Brown, dry, loose, well-graded, fine to coarse, SAND; no odor.
Brown, dry, stiff, CLAY; no odor.
Few to little sand.
No sand.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 1.5 feet.
Backfilled with 1-sack slurry from approximately 1.5 to 1 feet.
Capped with C2 PG6410 asphalt from 1 inch to surface.
4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 3
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 9/22/20 BORING NO. B3
GROUND ELEVATION 567' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-389
0 10
20 30
40 B4-5/13:30
B4-10/13:30
B4-15/13:33
B4-21/13:38
6.3 2.9
2.0 1.8
ML
SM
ML
SM
ASPHALT:
Approximately 4 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; no odor.
ALLUVIUM:
Brown, dry, loose, silty SAND; no odor.
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; no odor.
Brown, dry, loose, silty SAND; few gravel; no odor.
Light brown.
No gravel.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 2 feet.
Backfilled with 1-sack slurry from approximately 2 to 1 feet.
Capped with C2 PG6410 asphalt from 1 inch to surface.
4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 4
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 9/22/20 BORING NO. B4
GROUND ELEVATION 566' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-390
0 10
20 30
40 122.8
B5-5/11:33
B5-10/11:33
B5-15/11:38
B5-21/11:45
14.7 11.7
29.8 ML
SM
ML
SM
ML
ASPHALT:
Approximately 4 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; few cobbles; no odor.
ALLUVIUM:
Light brown, dry, loose, silty SAND; no odor.
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; no odor.
Light brown, dry, loose, silty SAND; no odor.
Brown, dry, firm, SILT; no odor.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 2 feet.
Backfilled with 1-sack slurry from approximately 2 to 1 feet.
Capped with C2 PG6410 asphalt from 1 inch to surface.
4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 5
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 9/23/20 BORING NO. B5
GROUND ELEVATION 566' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-391
0 10
20 30
40 B6-5/10:27
B6-10/10:29
B6-15/10:30
B6-21/10:45
27.0 18.3
17.2 22.6
ML
SM
ML
SP
ASPHALT:
Approximately 4 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; few cobble fragments; no odor.
ALLUVIUM:
Light brown, dry, loose, silty SAND; few gravel; no odor.
Brown, dry, stiff, SILT; no odor.
Firm.
Soft.
Brown, dry, loose, poorly graded, fine SAND; no odor.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 2 feet.
Backfilled with 1-sack slurry from approximately 2 to 1 feet.
Capped with C2 PG6410 asphalt from 1 inch to surface.
4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 6
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 9/23/20 BORING NO. B6
GROUND ELEVATION 565' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-392
0 10
20 30
40 B7-5/09:20
B7-10/09:20
B7-15/09:23
B7-21/09:28
12.6 17.8
14.8 12.2
ML
SM
SP
ASPHALT:
Approximately 4 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; few cobbles; no odor.
ALLUVIUM:
Light brown, dry, loose, silty SAND; no odor.
Brown.
Light brown.
Brown.
Trace gravel.
Light brown, dry, loose, fine, poorly graded, SAND; no odor.
Gray.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 2 feet.
Backfilled with 1-sack slurry from approximately 2 to 0 feet.
Capped with C2 PG6410 asphalt from 1 inch to surface.
4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 7
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 9/23/20 BORING NO. B7
GROUND ELEVATION 564' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-393
0 10
20 30
40 B8-5/13:40
B8-10/13:40
B8-15/13:44
B8-21/13:49
23.9 14.2
5.0 12.7
ML
SW
ML
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; few to little cobbles; few root fragments.
No root fragments.
ALLUVIUM:
Light brown, dry, loose, well-graded, fine to medium SAND; no odor.
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; no odor.
Firm.
Light brown; stiff.
Soft.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 feet to surface. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
Notes
:
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 8
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 9/23/20 BORING NO. B8
GROUND ELEVATION 565' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-394
0 10
20 30
40 0.0
0.0 B9-5/14:20
B9-15/14:27
0.0 0.0
ML
ML
SM
CL
ASPHALT:
Approximately 5 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; few 1/4-inch gravel; few sand; no odor.
ALLUVIUM:
Brown, dry, stiff, SILT; no odor.
Firm.
Grayish brown; soft.
Brown, dry, loose, silty SAND; no odor.
Few gravel; sand.
Medium dense.
No gravel; no sand.
Dense.
Soft.
Brown, dry, soft, CLAY; no odor.
Slightly moist.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 feet to 0 feet.
Capped with black-dyed concrete to match existing surface grade.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
4-inch diameter hand auger to 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 9
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 8/24/20 BORING NO. B9
GROUND ELEVATION 559' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-395
0 10
20 30
40 B10-10/0937
B10-21/09:39
0.0 0.1
0.0 0.0
ML
ML
CL
ML
CL
ASPHALT:
Approximately 5 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, sandy SILT; no odor.
ALLUVIUM:
Brown, dry, soft, sandy SILT; no odor.
1/2-inch gravel pieces for 2 inches.
No gravel.
Few clay.
Brown, dry, firm, CLAY; no odor.
Few to little gravel.
Brown, dry, stiff SILT; no odor.
Brown, dry, stiff, CLAY; no odor.
Soft.
Stiff.
Soft.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to - feet.
Capped with black-dyed concrete to match existing surface grade. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 10
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 8/24/20 BORING NO. B10
GROUND ELEVATION 559' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-396
0 10
20 30
40 0.0
B11-15/13:39
B11-21/13:45
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1
ML
ML
CL
ASPHALT:
Approximately 5 inches thick
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; few to little 2- to 3½-inch cobbles; no odor.
Brown, dry, firm, SILT; no odor.
Stiff; few gravel.
Light brown.
Soft.
Stiff.
Brown, dry, stiff, CLAY; no odor.
Soft.
Stiff.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 0 feet.
Capped with black-dyed concrete to match existing surface grade. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 11
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 8/26/20 BORING NO. B11
GROUND ELEVATION 558' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-397
0 10
20 30
40 B12-5/10:45
B12-15/10:48
0.0 0.0
0.0 ML
ML
SW
SM
ML
CL
ASPHALT:
Approximately 5 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, sandy SILT; few 1/4- to 1/2-inch gravel; no odor.
ALLUVIUM:
Brown, dry, soft, sandy SILT; no odor.
3-inch cobbles for 5 inches.
Few to little coarse sand.
Light brown, dry, loose, well-graded, fine to coarse SAND; no odor. 1/2-inch gravel pieces for 2 inches.
Medium dense; few clay.
Brown, dry, loose, silty SAND; no odor.
Dark brown, dry, stiff, SILT; no odor.
Few sand.
Dark brown, dry, stiff, CLAY; no odor.
Very stiff.
Stiff.
Yellowish brown.
Few to little fine sand.
Total Depth = 21.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 0 feet.
Capped with black-dyed concrete to match existing surface grade. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 12
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 8/24/20 BORING NO. B12
GROUND ELEVATION 558' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-398
0 10
20 30
40 B13-10/10:15
B13-21/10:24 0.2
ML
SP
SW
CL
SW
ML
ASPHALT:
Approximately 4 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; few to little 1/4- to 1/2-inch gravel.
Few to little 2- to 3½-inch cobble (rock and brick fragments).
ALLUVIUM:
Brown, dry, loose, poorly graded, fine SAND; no odor.
Gray, dry, loose, well-graded, fine to coarse SAND; no odor.
Dark brown, dry, soft, CLAY; few to little coarse sand; no odor.
Gray, dry, loose, well-graded, fine to coarse SAND; few gravel.
No odor.
No gravel.
Light brown.
Brown.
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; no odor.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 0 feet.
Capped with black-dyed concrete to match existing surface grade. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 13
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 8/25/20 BORING NO. B13
GROUND ELEVATION 558' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-399
0 10
20 30
40 B14-15/09:01
B14-21/09:06
0.0 0.0
ML
SP
ML
ML
ASPHALT:
Approximately 5 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; few to little 1/4- to 1/2-inch gravel; no odor.
Few to little 2- to 3-1/2-inch diameter cobbles (rock and brick fragments.
Gray; concrete debris.
ALLUVIUM:
Light brown, dry, loose, poorly graded medium SAND; no odor.
Few to little 1/4-inch gravel.
Brown, dry, stiff, SILT; no odor.
Few to little 1/4-inch gravel.
No gravel.
Soft.
Firm.
Brown, dry, firm, SILT; no odor.
Few fine-grained sand.
Light brown.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 0 feet.
Capped with black-dyed concrete to match existing surface grade. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 14
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 8/25/20 BORING NO. B14
GROUND ELEVATION 557' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-400
0 10
20 30
40 4.2
1.6 B15-5/13:28
B15-10/13:32
0.0 0.0
ML
SP
ML
ASPHALT:
Approximately 5 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, loose, sandy SILT; few 1/4- to 1/2-inch gravel; no odor.
Large 4-inch diameter cobbles; trace brick fragments.
ALLUVIUM:
Light brown, dry, loose, poorly graded SAND.
Brown, dry, stiff, SILT.
Few 1/4- to 1/2-inch gravel fragments.
Soft; few sand.
Stiff.
Very stiff.
Trace coarse sand.
Soft.
Dark brown; stiff.
Soft.
Stiff.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 0 feet.
Capped with black-dyed concrete to match existing surface grade. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 15
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 8/24/20 BORING NO. B15
GROUND ELEVATION 557' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-401
0 10
20 30
40 B16-5/10:28
B16-15/10:37
0.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
ML
SM
SW
ML
CL
ASPHALT:
Approximately 4 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; few to little 2- to 3-1/2-inch cobbles; no odor.
ALLUVIUM:
Dark brown, dry, loose, silty SAND; no odor.
Gray, dry, loose, well-graded, fine to coarse SAND; no odor.
Brown, dry, very stiff, SILT; no odor.
Rock fragments.
Soft.
Stiff.
Brown, dry, stiff, CLAY; no odor.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 0 feet.
Capped with black-dyed concrete to match existing surface grade. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 16
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 8/26/20 BORING NO. B16
GROUND ELEVATION 557' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-402
0 10
20 30
40 B17-5/11:22
B17-15/11:30
0.7 0.5
0.4 0.6
ML
ML
SW
ML
CL
ASPHALT:
Approximately 5 inches thick.
FILL;
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; few to little cobbles; no odor.
ALLUVIUM:
Brown, dry, soft, poorly graded SILT; no odor.
Gray, dry, loose, well-graded, fine to coarse SAND; no odor.
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; no odor.
Stiff.
Very stiff.
Brown, dry, stiff, CLAY; no odor.
Firm.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 0 feet.
Capped with black-dyed concrete to match existing surface grade. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 17
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 8/26/20 BORING NO. B17
GROUND ELEVATION 556' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-403
0 10
20 30
40 B18-5/08:02
B18-10/08:05
0.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
ML
SP
ML
CL
ASPHALT:
Approximately 5 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; few 2- to 3-1/2-inch gravel and cobbles; no odor.
ALLUVIUM:
Brown, dry, loose, poorly graded, fine SAND; no odor.
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; no odor.
Stiff.
Very stiff.
Brown, dry, stiff, CLAY; no odor.
Firm.
Soft.
Firm.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 0 feet.
Capped with black-dyed concrete to match existing surface grade. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 18
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 8/26/20 BORING NO. B18
GROUND ELEVATION 556' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-404
0 10
20 30
40 B19-5/09:20
B19-10/09:25
1.2 0.4
0.3 0.0
ML
SP
ML
ASPHALT:
Approximately 4 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; few to little 2-inch to 3-1/2-inch cobbles; no odor.
ALLUVIUM:
Light brown, dry, loose, poorly graded, fine SAND; no odor.
Dark brown; medium dense.
Trace gravel.
Light brown.
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; no odor.
Firm.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 0 feet.
Capped with black-dyed concrete to match existing surface grade. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 19
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 8/26/20 BORING NO. B19
GROUND ELEVATION 556' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-405
0 10
20 30
40 B20-5/14:47
B20-21/14:55
0.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
ML
SP
ML
CL
ASPHALT:
Approximately 5 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; few 1/4-inch gravel; no odor.
Trace 2- to 3-1/2-inch cobbles.
ALLUVIUM:
Brown, dry, loose, poorly graded, fine, SAND; no odor.
Few gravel.
Cobble fragments.
No gravel or cobble fragments.
Brown, dry, firm, SILT; no odor.
Few gravel.
Stiff.
Firm.
Very stiff.
Dark brown.
Brown, dry, stiff, CLAY; no odor.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 0 feet.
Capped with black-dyed concrete to match existing surface grade. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 20
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 8/25/20 BORING NO. B20
GROUND ELEVATION 556' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-406
0 10
20 30
40 B21-10/13:53
B21-15/13:57
0.4 0.0
0.0 ML
SP
ML
SW
ML
CL
FILL:
Brown, dry, stiff, SILT; few gravel; no odor; few to little 2- to 3-1/2-inch cobbles.
ALLUVIUM:
Brown, dry, loose, poorly graded, medium SAND; no odor.
Brow, dry, stiff, SILT; no odor.
Few to little gravel.
Gray, dry, loose, well-graded, fine to coarse SAND; few to little gravel; no odor.
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; no odor.
Firm.
Very stiff; few gravel.
Soft.
Stiff.
Brown, dry, very stiff, CLAY; no odor.
Stiff.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 0 feet.
Capped with black-dyed concrete to match existing surface grade. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 21
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 8/25/20 BORING NO. B21
GROUND ELEVATION 557' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-407
0 10
20 30
40 B22-5/11:46
B22-10/11:49
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
ML
SP
ML
SP
ASPHALT:
Approximately 4 inches thick.
FILL:
Brown, dry, soft, SILT; no odor.
Few to little 2- to 3-1/2-inch cobbles.
ALLUVIUM:
Brown, dry, loose, poorly graded, fine SAND; no odor.
Light gray; trace gravel.
Brown, dry, stiff, SILT; no odor.
Few to little gravel.
Light brown; no gravel.
Soft.
Firm.
Soft.
Dark brown; stiff.
Firm.
Light brown, dry, loose, poorly graded, fine SAND; few gravel.
Total Depth = 21 feet.
Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Backfilled with neat cement from approximately 21 to 0 feet.
Capped with black-dyed concrete to match existing surface grade. 4-inch diameter hand auger to approximately 5 feet.
2.25-inch diameter direct push boring to total depth.
Notes
:
Groundwater, though not encountered at the time of drilling, may rise to a higher level due to seasonal variations in precipitation and several other factors as discussed in the report.
The ground elevation shown above is an estimation only. It is based on our interpretations of published maps and other documents reviewed for the purposes of this evaluation. It is not sufficiently accurate for preparing construction bids and design documents.
FIGURE A- 22
164 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
DEPTH (feet)
Bulk SAMPLESDriven
BLOWS/FOOT
SAMPLE ID/TIME
PID READING
(ppm)
MOISTURE
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
U.S.C.S.
DESCRIPTION/INTERPRETATION
DATE DRILLED 8/25/20 BORING NO. B22
GROUND ELEVATION 557' ± (MSL) SHEET 1 OF
METHOD OF DRILLING 6600 GeoProbe Direct Push (Interphase Env)
DRIVE WEIGHT N/A DROP N/A
SAMPLED BY JF LOGGED BY JF REVIEWED BY KFG
1 ATTACHMENT 2
A2-408
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020
APPENDIX B
Off-Site Excavation Permit
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-409
(19,5210(17$/+($/7+
'ULQNLQJ:DWHU3URJUDP
5050 Commerce Drive, Baldwin Park, CA 91706
Telephone: (626) 430-5420 • http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/eh/ep/dw/dw_main.htm
:RUN3ODQ$SSURYDO
WORK SITE ADDRESS CITY ZIP EMAIL ADDRESS
164 West Magnolia Blvd Burbank 91502 [email protected]
127,&(
≠ WORK PLAN APPROVALS ARE VALID FOR 180 DAYS. 30 DAY EXTENSIONS OF WORK PLAN APPROVALS ARE CONSIDERED ON AN INDIVIDUAL (CASE-B Y- CASE) BASIS AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW FEES ( HOURLY RATE AS APPLICABLE). ≠ WORK PLAN MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED IF WELL AND GEOLOGIC C ONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED AT THE SITE INSPECTION ARE FOUND TO DIFFER FROM THE SCOPE OF WORK PRESENTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HE ALTH—DRINKING WATER PROGRAM. ≠ WORK PLAN APPROVALS ARE LIMITED TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFOR NIA WELL STANDARDS AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE AND DOES NOT GRANT ANY RIGHTS TO CONSTRUCT, RENOVATE, OR DECOMMISSION ANY WE LL. THE APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING ALL OTHER
NECESSARY PERMITS SUCH AS WATER RIGHTS, PROPERTY RIGHTS, COASTA L COMMISSION APPROVALS, USE COVENANTS, ENCROACHMENT PERMISSIONS, UTILITY LINE SETBACKS, CITY/COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS RIGHTS OF WAY, ETC. ≠ THIS PERMIT IS NOT COMPLETE UNTIL ALL OF THE FOLLOWING REQUIRE MENTS ARE SIGNED BY THE DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER. WORK SHALL NOT BE INITIATED WITHOUT A WORK PLAN APPROVAL STAMPED BY THE DEPARTMEN T OF PUBLIC HEALTH—DRINKING WATER PROGRAM.
72%(&203/(7('%<'(3$570(172)38%/,&+($/7+ —'5,1.,1*:$7(5352*5$0
[
WORK PLAN APPROVED FOR:
22 Soil Boring/Exp. Hole
3(50,7
180%(5
SR0231199 '$7(
8-19-2020
ADDITIONAL APPROVAL CONDITIONS:
≠ Work plan approval is issued for scope of work submitted to the Drinking Water Program. Any modifications to the scope of work will require additional work plan review. ≠ Ensure the boring/exploration hole is backfilled within 24 hou rs of boring construction. ≠ Ensure to backfill using a tremie pipe under pressure or equiv alent equipment with approved cement grout, proceeding upward from the bottom of the boring/exploration hole. ≠ Ensure soil borings are sealed per California Well Standards 7 4-90 o Cement grout mix ratio of 5-6 gallons of water per 94-pound bag of Portland cement. o Up to 6% of Bentonite may be added to the cement-based mix. o No hydrated Bentonite chips
≠ Borings/Exploration holes must comply with all applicable requirements published in the California Well Standards (Bulletins 74-81 and 74-90) and the L os Angeles County Code, Title
11. ATTACHMENT 2
A2-410
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020
APPENDIX C
Work Plan Approval Permit
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-411
!"
!"#""
"!
#
$
#!%%&&
$%% &
''( )
&$'*+&
'
#()! *+,-. "
-
#! &%%&&
#! &%&%&&
'/
! &%%&
,-,") *'.
-"+ /$0& 0)
1
2
3
2 /
,
!
)
0
-##
! 12
###"
&&
(3
,-4
! 11&1&
5
! 6&
7 ! ,)
(3
(8
-##
! 48$
(9#+
(3
,-&
! 1
5
!
1
2
3
$
$
3
#
$$
(#$
+
,
!,#:(8
:/&
*$
!-&&&&-
;;;;
'. <,7 * < 7 ";;;;
"
("&+
<,
9 #
+
-
)
3
#
#
3),
+
% 4
%54
=
>&+&& >&+&&<
!
(
*
! >&+&&
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-412
/
!
"
#
$
%
&
'
%
()*'+
)
(*
$,
-.'
-/
%
(
0
%,
0,'+'
$
%
!1
0%/
(
$
%
&
2
%
(
(
(
0
%
.
34/&!
2
,
*-+
--+
%
%
.*
5(
%
%
) 5
(5
/
%
"6
%
%
)
(
%7
%
!
(
,
0,'+.'
8
%
(
0
%
9
%
%
*
(
(
(
)
)
:
:,
(
'
(
3'5++!
(
(,
(
(;
<
0
,
*99=
>
(
0
%,
)
(
?
+&
!4
,
4,
(
0
%;
7
@
(
$
8&&&
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-413
0 A
(
%
"
!
(
(
(
- B
(
(
.
$/C3
,
,
)
(
/
;
5
8 B
%
9 /
%(
#
%!
(
%
#
)
(
(
(
B
%
!
A
D:D
#
!
%
(
* /
'
#
''
(
'
(;
E
7
(
4
'
(
(
(;
> /
4
(
(
!
B
)
$
%
&
)
(
,
,
E
,
(
B
(
)
$
%
&
)
4
(
(
7
(
(
(;
+ 4
(
/
E
4
%
,
)
(
;
(
)
)
(
)
7
'
%
!
)
()
4
,
%
'
@ )
%)
)
)
" 3
(
(;
#()
-
"$
*
*
$
8&&&
Daniel Carns 08/31/2020
-
"$
9/1/2020
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-414
PERMIT # PW2002196 – BWP Water to drill for soil boring (164 W Magnolia Blvd & Varney St) • PCI of Varney St: AC 14
•• Resurface pot holes in street per City Standard Plan BS-110-3 (T-Cut comply with compaction requirement).
• Resurface pot holes in parkway per City Standard Plan BS-110-3, Case V (Comply with compaction requirement).
• All trench resurfacing shall be per note 4 of City Standard Plan BS-110-3, which states:
o Trench backfill shall be densified to a minimum of 90% relative compaction. o When pavement is to be placed directly on subgrade material, the top 6” of subgrade material shall be compacted to a relative compaction of 95%. • Applicant shall protect in place all survey monuments (City, County, State, Federal, and private). Any monument that require s removal shall be re-established by a licensed land surveyor or a qualified registered professional engineer as approved by the Public Works Director [State of California, Business and Professions Code, Section 8771]. ____________________________ ____________________________________
APPLICANT SIGNATURE DATE ISSUANCE PERMIT APPROVAL DATE
___________________________ ____________________________________
PRINT NAME FINAL PERMIT APPROVAL DATE
Daniel Carns 8/31/2020
Claudia Reyes
9/1/2020
___________________________________________________________________ ___ ATTACHMENT 2
A2-415
CITY OF BURBANK
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Pending Permit No. __________________
EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
DATE APPLIED: START DATE: (Permit valid for two months from plan approval date)
DIG ALERT NO.: DATE ISSUED:
(Call 811 or www.contact811.org . Call 2 days in prior to digging.)
INSURANCE EXPIRATION DATE:
(Note: Minimum $1,000,000 General Aggregate or $300,000 Homeowner's Liability. Please ask for additional requirements).
JOB TYPE: Commercial/Industrial/Multi-Family Residential/Single Family
CAL/OSHA PER. NO:
(For Excav. 5'+ Deep)
RELATED ON-SITE BUILDING/GRADING PROJECT:
JOB SITE: Burbank, CA
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
Initial that the requirements on the reverse side have been read and understood.
If sewer lateral replacement is greater than 10 linear feet, a back water valve may be required. (BMC 8-1-313)
PLANS SUBMITTED:
Yes No
(For jobs involving utility trenching and other extensive excavations, submit four [4] sets showing all existing underground utilities in Plan and Cross- section. Where possible conflicts may arise, clear with all affected utilities. Plans will be returned if all substructures are not shown.)
JOB ITEMS
Sidewalk sq.ft. Centerline Ties no.
Apron ft. O/A ft. depth Type
Curb lin. ft. Gutter lin. ft.
Ped Ramps no. Curb Drains no.
Trenching lin. ft. ft. width
AC P a v e m e n t s q . f t . in. thick
PCC Pavement s q . f t . in. thick
ESTIMATED CHARGES
(Non-Refundable) SF MF/Comm Permit Fee $56.00 $106.00
Processing Charge $ 50.00
(for refund)
Inspection Charge $
Construction Deposit $
(refundable*)
TOTAL $
*Finished job must meet City standards.
PERMITTEE: PHONE: ( )
(Name as Insured)
CHECK ONE: Owner Contractor: Burbank Business License No.:
ADDRESS:
Street City State Zip Code
AUTHORIZED AGENT: TITLE:
P E R M I T C O N D I T I O N S :
8/24/20
TBD 8/18/20
10/3/2020
X
Not Applicable
BWP Stormwater Improvement Project
164 West Magnolia Blvd. & North Varney St.
Implementation of traffic control in the drilling of seven 2.25 inch diameter soil borings to a depth of approximately 21 feet below ground surface in North Varney Street X
City of Burbank, Burbank Water and Power 818 238-3510
X
164 W. Magnolia Blvd Burbank CA 91502
Claudia Reyes Sr. Environmental Engineer
8/13/20
CR
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-416
(E) SDCB
(E) SDCB
(E) 11' X 6' RCB
INVERT ELEV 555.78
(N) 36" RCP STORM DRAIN
W MAGNOLIA BLVD
N VARNEY ST
N VARNEY ST
N VARNEY ST
(E) 18" SDCB
N INVERT ELEV 560.63
S INVERT ELEV 559.83
(E) SDMH
NW INVERT ELEV 556.45'
NE INVERT ELEV 556.92
SW INVERT ELEV 556.17'
(N) INVERT ELEV 556.12'
0+00
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00
(N) SDMH
STA 4+46
RIM ELEV 565.23
SE INVERT ELEV 550.55
NE INVERT ELEV 550.45
(N) SDMH
STA 4+04
RIM ELEV 566.60
SW INVERT ELEV 550.69
NW INVERT ELEV 550.59
(N) SDMH
STA 1+71
RIM ELEV 563.99
SW INVERT ELEV 551.02
NE INVERT ELEV 550.92
(N) MANHOLE
STA 1+30
RIM ELEV 563.62
S INVERT ELEV 551.16
NE INVERT ELEV 551.06
(N) SDMH
STA 0+92
RIM ELEV 564.17
S INVERT ELEV 554.60
N INVERT ELEV 551.21
(E) 18" SDCB
INVERT ELEV 561.23
(N) OUTFALL
STA 4+55
(N) 36" RCP
STORM DRAIN
(N) 36" RCP STORM DRAIN (N) 36" RCP
STORM DRAIN
BURBANK WESTERN CHANNEL
(E) 18" STORM DRAIN
9 99
9 9
3 88
8 5
7 5
11 1 7
8 6
5 10
4 (E) SDCB
2 PROTECT IN PLACE
540
550
560
570
540
550
560
570
-0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00
EXISTING ELECTRICAL DUCTS
STA 0+89
INVERT ELEV 554.60
STA 1+28
INVERT ELEV 551.16
STA 1+33
INVERT ELEV 551.06
STA 1+68
INVERT ELEV 551.02
STA 1+74
INVERT ELEV 550.92
STA 4+07
INVERT ELEV 550.59
STA 4+01
INVERT ELEV 550.69
STA 4+42.72
INVERT ELEV 550.55
STA 4+49
INVERT ELEV 550.45
36" OUTFALL
STA 4+55
INVERT ELEV 550.44
EXISTING ELECTRICAL DUCTS
STA 0+84
INVERT ELEV 554.78
STA 0+95
INVERT ELEV 551.21
STA 0+00
INVERT ELEV 555.00
INVERT ELEV 556.16
EXISTING CATCH
BASIN TO REMAIN
STA 4+55
BWC ELEV 549.56
EXISTING GROUND SURFACE
6" GAS LINE
2" GAS LINE
6 & 2 MTD, PT& T
6" WATER LINE
12" WATER LINE
999
9 9
8 8 8 8 8
10 6
43 2
SLOPE 0.1% SLOPE 0.1% SLOPE 0.1% SLOPE 0.1%
EXISTING CATCH
BASIN TO REMAIN
DEMO EXISTING AND INSTALL NEW 8.75' CURB INLET, PER SSPWC DETAIL 300-3.
SAW CUT THROUGH CHANNEL WALL AND INSTALL OUTLET FOR 36-INCH PIPE PER SHEETS S-01 & S-02.
SEAL EXISTING PIPE PER DETAIL 2, SHEET C-04.
RECONFIGURE RCB, PER DETAIL 2, SHEET C-04.
REPLACE EXISTING 18-INCH RCP WITH NEW 24-INCH RCP STORM DRAIN AND CONNECT PER SSPWC DETAIL 335-2 . TRENCH PER DETAIL 6, SHEET C-05.
MAINTAIN EXISTING INVERTS.
CONNECT RCB AND NEW 36-INCH RCP STORM DRAIN PER DETAIL 1, SHEET C-04.
REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING TREES INTERFERING WITH CONSTRUCTION IN KIND.
INSTALL NEW 36-INCH RCP STORM DRAIN, CONSTRUCT PER DETAIL 3, SHEET C-04.
INSTALL MANHOLE PER SSPWC DETAIL 320-2.
CONNECT (N) 24-INCH STORM DRAIN TO EXISTING RCB, PER SSPWC DETAIL 335-2. INVERT ELEVATION 556.16.
REPLACE EXISTING MANHOLE WITH NEW MANHOLE, PER SSPWC DETAIL 320-2.
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
3 C-02
OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS
8 A
DWG NO.
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
TNH
MMM
NEP OF
0'0'20' 20'
HORIZ: 1 inch = 20 feet
VERT: 1 inch = 5 feet
PROFILE
PLAN
0'0'20' 20'
1 inch = 20 feet
1. SANITARY SEWER LOCATIONS NOT SHOWN.
2. UTILITIES SHOWN ON PROFILE ARE APPROXIMATE. POTHOLE AND LOCATE ALL UTILITIES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION.
**35% DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION**
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 GENERAL NOTES
DATEPROJECT ENGINEER
R.C.E. 74580
TYLER N. HUNT
STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Proposed Soil Boring Location to approximately 21 ft bgs SB-8/15'
City of Burbank
Public Works Permits Department
Approval Routing
^ĞĐƚŝŽŶƉƉƌŽǀĂůLJĂƚĞ Sewer Eng.
Storm Drain Eng.
Street Eng.
Traffic Eng.
Traffic Signal ops.
Survey Mons.
Permit #
Expires
Public Works Director Approval
By
PW2008220
CITY OF BURBANK - BWP
APPROVED BY DATE
ELECTRIC U.G. ____ _________
ELECTRIC U.G. ____ _________
SERVICES
ST. LIGHTING ____ _________
WATER ____ _________
FIBER OPTIC ____ _________
OFFICIAL FILE COPY - BWP
IMPORTANT!! RETURN TO SURVEYORS
MARKED BY: DATE:
AB 8/20/2020
AB 8/20/2020
AB 8/20/2020
SEE ATTACHED
EE-0539
EE-1440
SA 8/20/2020
RY 8/20/2020 I.D. 48-02
REQUIREMENTS FOR WORKING NEAR BWP WATER FACILITIES AND/OR TRENCHING UNDER
BWP WATER MAINS
Verify and protect in place all Burbank Water & Power water mains, water service laterals, valve cans, meter boxes, fire hydrants, their appurtenances and any encountered main line thrust blocks within the proposed project corridor. Allow minimum 12” wall to wall vertical and 36” horizontal separation between existing water mains and proposed utility line. Per DDW, horizontal separation from an existing potable water main must be 10 feet for new sewer and 4 feet for new recycled water pipelines. If trenching under water mains is eight feet or more in width, support water main per APWA Southern California Chapter Standard Plan 224-0, Case 1.
Backfill with one sack slurry mix to five feet on each side of crossing.
F Nerthling 08/20/20 see attached
D. Jeffrey 08/26/2020 (see attached)
D. Jeffrey 08/26/2020 (see attached)
K Kozovich 8/26/2020 (see attached)
K Kozovich 8/26/2020 (see attached)
STREET RESTORATION SHALL CONFORM
TO CITY STANDARD BS 110-3
10-01-2020
Daniel Carns 08/31/2020
Daniel Carns 08/31/2020 PROTECT ALL SURVEY MONUMENTS. DAMAGES SHALL BE RESTORED
BY LICENSED SURVEYOR
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-417
FG 558.00
FG 557.58
FG 555.69
EXISTING STORM DRAIN,
PROTECT IN PLACE
EXISTING 36" STORM DRAIN,
PROTECT IN PLACE
EXISTING BUILDING,
PROTECT IN PLACE
EXISTING BUILDING,
PROTECT IN PLACE
EXISTING BUILDING,
PROTECT IN PLACE
EXISTING BUILDING,
PROTECT IN PLACE
(N) SDMH
STA 0+12
RIM ELEV 558.20
INVERT OUT 546.37
INVERT IN 546.46
INVERT TO STORAGE 541.64
FG 555.69
TO BWC
DISCHARGE TO VAULT /
BELOW GRADE RESERVOIR
MATERIAL STORAGE BUILDING
STORAGE
BUILDING
COOLING TOWER
EXISTING 18" STORM DRAIN,
PROTECT IN PLACE
EXISTING GUTTER,
PROTECT IN PLACE
EXISTING STORM DRAIN,
PROTECT IN PLACE
2 7
7 9
8 7
9 4
2 2
2 2
3 5
(N) SDMH
STA 0+00
RIM ELEV 558.49
INVERT 546.30
(N) SDMH
STA 0+59
RIM ELEV 558.20
NW INVERT 541.38
SW INVERT 541.23
1 COOLING TOWER
1 A
C-06
A
C-06
B
C-06
B
C-06
6 68'-0"
132'-0"
ACCESS MANHOLE
0+00
0+25
0+50
0+75 1+001+04
0'0'10' 10'
1 inch = 10 feet
INSTALL NEW MANHOLE PER SSPWC DETAIL 320-2.
INSTALL 2-INCH PERFORATED PVC SCHEDULE 40 FOR INFILTRATION.
INSTALL DUPLEX STORM WATER PUMP STATION.
INSTALL PRETREATMENT SYSTEM CAPABLE OF TREATING 8.0 CFS. OLD CASTLE 8' WIDE CONCRETE VAULT PERKFILTER OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
INSTALL 2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 316 STAINLESS STEEL PIPE FOR STORM WATER LINE FROM PUMP TO EXISTING RESERVOIR.
UNDER GROUND STORAGE VAULTS, STORMTRAP SYSTEM, OR EQUIVALENT, INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION. TOTAL VOLUME TO BE STORED = 37,000 CF.
INSTALL NEW 24-INCH RCP STORM DRAIN, SEE SHEET C-05 FOR PROFILE. CONNECT TO MANHOLE PER SSPWC DETAIL 320-2.
DEMO EXISTING AND INSTALL NEW MANHOLE PER SSPWC DETAIL 320-2.
INSTALL SHUTOFF VALVE
4 C-03
8 A
DWG NO.
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
TNH
MMM
NEP
ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS
OF
**35% DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION**
ONSITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 CONSTRUCTION NOTES
DATEPROJECT ENGINEER
R.C.E. 74580
TYLER N. HUNT
STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Proposed Soil boring locations at approx.21 ft bgs
SB-22/10'
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-418
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-419
TC-01
1 -NOR INNOVATIONS INC.
DVBE/SBE CERTIFIED CO. LIC. #931953
SHEET
OF
SHEET NO.
TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES: LEGEND:
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS FOR:
POTHOLING
VARNEY ST.
BURBANK, CA
VARNEY ST.
MAGNOLIA BLVD.
3 CITY OF BURBANK
POTHOLING
NINYO & MOORE
475 GODDARD
IRVINE, CA 92618
OFFICE: (949)753-7070
CITY OF BURBANK - TRAFFIC ONLY
s Approved; no exceptions taken
s Approved as corrected
s Revise and resubmit
BY:_________ DATE:_________ D. Jeffrey 08/26/2020
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-420
TC-02
VARNEY ST.
MAGNOLIA BLVD.
2 -NOR INNOVATIONS INC.
DVBE/SBE CERTIFIED CO. LIC. #931953
SHEET
OF
3 SHEET NO.
CITY OF BURBANK
POTHOLING
NINYO & MOORE
475 GODDARD
IRVINE, CA 92618
OFFICE: (949)753-7070
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-421
TC-03
VARNEY ST.
MAGNOLIA BLVD.
3 -NOR INNOVATIONS INC.
DVBE/SBE CERTIFIED CO. LIC. #931953
SHEET
OF
3 SHEET NO.
CITY OF BURBANK
POTHOLING
NINYO & MOORE
475 GODDARD
IRVINE, CA 92618
OFFICE: (949)753-7070
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-422
PW2008220
K:\Water Rec Sewer\Eden\Work Functions\Sewer Excavation Permit\PW2008220.doc Water Reclamation and Sewer Division
Utility Excavation Permit Notes
Contractor(s) must protect in place public sewer mains and all sewer laterals during construction as well as storm drains, connector pipes and catch basins. Sewer permit sketches show estimated location of sewer laterals.
Sewer and Storm Water Infrastructure Requirements
In the event the proposed project elects to cover catc h basins during constructi on activities, the project proponent must remove the protective cover when a rain event is forecasted, including holidays, weekends, and before and after c onstruction operating days/hours. A dditionally, only clean storm water runoff should be entering the catch basin.
Protection of any surrounding storm drain facilities is required. Any damage to these facilities must be restored to original conditions and paid by the responsible party at fault.
Storm Water Quality Requirements
The proposed project, during and afte r construction activities, must comp ly with Section 8-1-1003 of the BMC titled Discharge to the Storm Drain System, wh ich primarily prohibits illicit connection and illicit discharges to the MS4 drainage sy stem. The BMC can be accessed at http://www.codepublishing.com/ca/burbank/
The proposed project, during and afte r construction activities, must co mply with Section 8-1-1004 of the BMC titled Runoff Management Requirements, which primarily consists of cont rol measures necessary to mitigate and control storm water po llution. The BMC can be accessed at http://www.codepublishing.com/ca/burbank/
Stockpiles of construction material or on-site soil must be covered and bermed in place at all times.
Further, good housekeeping for concrete slurry, oil, a nd heavy machinery should be enacted at all times, and particularly during periods of non-construction activity. The propos ed project will need to properly dispose of hazardous, toxic, metal, trash and any other on-site generated waste.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-423
PW2008220
K:\Water Rec Sewer\Eden\Work Functions\Sewer Excavation Permit\PW2008220.doc ATTACHMENT 2
A2-424
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-425
q
p
q
p
ãy
p
ãy
ãy p
pp
pp
n
p
ãy
n
#I#I
#I
#I
#I
#I #I
#I
#I
#I
¯ !(C
{
{
r
{
{
{
{
{
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_^_
^_ ^_
&3
^_
&3
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
øì
øì
øì
øì
øì
øì
øì
øì
øì
øì
øì
øì
øì
øì
øì
øì
øìøì
øì
øì
øì
øì
øì
øì
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
2020
2019
164
17 435
416
5 416
418
424
135
430
163
423
421
425
414
420
145
432
424
410
415
164
428
451
151
432
149
143
143
436
413
440
416
455
W Magnolia Blvd
N Varney
St
N Moss St
Olive Lincoln #2
Burbank San Jose
Burbank MPP
MH-HQ
MH-HU
MH-HR
MH-HT
MH-QQQ
MH-201
MH-010
MH-PPP
MH-083
PB-411
PB-632
TPB881
CST-3074
CST-3073
P-1323
P-1302
P-1303
P-1314
R
R
R
SW #106
SW #287
12125
75 10705
300
10287
750
11897
300
--8260
--25
--9145
--75
10861-10779-
50-25-
8891-8890-9142
50-50-75
11178-11177-11179
50-50-50
12153-12154-12155
75-75-75
11293-11294-11292
50-50-50
13420-13422-13421
75-75-75
13411-13410-13412
50-50-50
25 65
40 40
25609-B
50'-1994
25608-B
50'-1994
25610-B
55'-1994
22495-B
45'-2010
25611-B
50'-1994
25606-B
55'-1994
29071-B
50'-2009
21805-B
45'-1971
27638-B
80'-2003
28481-B
50'-2010
25607-B
50'-1995
28498-B
50'-2010
18659-B
80'-1961
25612-B
55'-1995
27699-B
80'-2003
27643-B
50'-2003
25613-B
50'-1995
22496-B
45'-1976
25473-B
50'-1992
27107-B
45'-1976
27106-B
45'-2010
24170-B
45'-1985
28499-B
50'-2010
22494-B
45'-1976
8/20/2020
·
1 inch = 96 feet
Burbank Water and Power
abacic
Legend
Pole
Ty pe
!( Non-wood
!( Wood
Secondary OH
Lines
1 Phase Service
1 Phase Secondary
2 Phase Service
2 Phase Secondary
3 Phase Service
3 Phase Secondary
Secondary UG
Cable
Traffic Signal Service
1 Phase Service
1 Phase Secondary
2 Phase Service
2 Phase Secondary
3 Phase Service
3 Phase Secondary
Lines
OH Streetlight
Cable
UG Streetlight
Primary OH
Null
Lines
4 kV Single Phase
4 kV Two Phase
4 kV Three Phase
12 kV Single Phase
12 kV Two Phase
12 kV Three Phase
Bus Bar
Null Bus Bar
Primary UG
<all other values>
Cable
4 kV Single Phase
4 kV Two Phase
4 kV Three Phase
12 kV Single Phase
12 kV Two Phase
12 kV Three Phase
Switch Cabinet Bus Bar
Surface Structure
Ty pe
çïCustomer Station
ß Junction Box
åôPad
Ýò Pedestal
ÑSwitch Cabinet
UG Structure - Large
SubtypeCode
%,Manhole
ñ) Pullbox
×b
Vault
Trans OH Conductor
Owner, Subtype, Operatin
B, Transmission OH, 34.5
B, Transmission OH, 69 k
E, Transmission OH, 66 k
M, Transmission OH, 34.5
M, Transmission OH, 500
Trans UG Conductor
Owner, Subtype, Operatin
B, Bus Bar, <Null>
B, Transmission UG, 34.5
B, Transmission UG, 69 k
120/240V STREET LIGHT
U.G. SERVICE (TYP)
4,160 VOLTS U.G. PRIMARY
GENERAL NOTE:
CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT IN PLACE ALL
ELECTRIC FACILITIES. CONTACT BWP ENG'G.
SERVICES AT (818) 238-3592 OF ANY EXISTING
DAMAGE TO THESE FACILITIES PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION OR ELSE CONTRACTOR
WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRS.
FOR ANY WORK RELATING TO STREET LIGHT
FACILITIES, CONTACT BWP STREET LIGHT
ENGINEER 72 HRS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
AT (818) 238-3647.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-426
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-427
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-428
MAPPING AND RECORDS DIVISION
Excavation Permit Routing Slip
Permit No: ____________
Address: _____________________________________________
Utility: _______________________ USA Ticket No: _______________
INITIALS DATE
Electrical U.G. ______ _______________ Electrical U.G. Services ______ _______________ Water ______ _______________ Fiber Optics U.G. ______ _______________ Surveyors ______ _______________ PW 2008220
100-125 W. Magnolia Blvd
AB 8/20/2020
AB 8/20/2020
SA 8/20/2020
RY 8/20/2020
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-429
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020
APPENDIX D
Photographs
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-430
FIGURE D-1
PHOTOGRAPHS
164 WEST MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
Photograph 1: GPR Geophysical Survey equipment traversing across proposed boring location
Photograph 2: Hand Auger Boring in On-site Southern Parcel
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-431
FIGURE D-2
PHOTOGRAPHS
164 WEST MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
Photograph 3: Cobble and brick fragments encountered in On-Site Southern Par- cel Boring
Photograph 4: Direct Push Drilling rig in On-Site Southern Parcel
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-432
FIGURE D-3
PHOTOGRAPHS
164 WEST MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
Photograph 5: Concrete Patch in On-Site Southern Parcel
Photograph 6: Geophysical Survey Marking in Off-Site Northern Parcel ATTACHMENT 2
A2-433
FIGURE D-4
PHOTOGRAPHS
164 WEST MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
Photograph 7: Hand Augering and Traffic Control in Off-Site Northern Parcel
Photograph 8: Direct Push Drilling and Traffic Control along Varney Street
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-434
FIGURE D-5
PHOTOGRAPHS
164 WEST MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
Photograph 9: Soil Logging and PID usage in Off-Site Northern Parcel boring
Photograph 10: Temporary Asphalt Patch of Boring in Off-Site North Parcel
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-435
FIGURE D-6
PHOTOGRAPHS
164 WEST MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
Photograph 11: Temporary Storage of Waste Drums in On-Site Southern Parcel
Photograph 12: Preparation of Asphalt Hot Patch in Off-Site Northern Parcel ATTACHMENT 2
A2-436
FIGURE D-7
PHOTOGRAPHS
164 WEST MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA
211491001 | 11/20
Photograph 13: Application of Asphalt Hot Patch in Off-Site Northern Parcel
Photograph 14: Completed Asphalt Hot Patch of Boring in Off-Site Northern Parcel ATTACHMENT 2
A2-437
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020
APPENDIX E
Field Proced ures
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-438
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 1
APPENDIX E
FIELD PROCEDURES
Hand Auger Soil Sampling Procedures
A hand-auger bucket is attached to an extension rod and “T” handle using threaded nuts or locking pins. If concr ete was present, the location was cored prior to hand augering. The auger was advanced into the soil by hand while simultaneously rotating and putting downward pressure on the T-handle. The bucket was retrieved periodically (typically every 3 to 5 inches).
Soil cuttings were profiled and disposed of in accordance with the Soil Classification and Investigative Derived Waste Standard Operating Procedures.
Direct-Push Soil Sampling Procedures
Prior to advancing soil borings, the proposed locations for borehole s were hand -augered to approximately 5 feet bgs to clear utilities. Drilling services were provided by InterPhase Environmental, Inc. of Commerce, California a State-licensed drilling contractor. The direct-push rig consists of a van or pick -up truck-mounted hydraulic ram/pneumatic hammer system which pushes 4 -foot-long, 1¼ -inch-diameter rods. Soil samples are collected by attaching a 2 - or 4-foot-long, 1.6 - or 2 -inch-diameter, stainless steel core sample or macro -core sampler containing brass or acetate sleeves to the bottom of the rods.
The probe-drive sampler consists of the sampler, sample tube, a piston tip attached to a piston rod, a drive head, and a piston stop pin. The sample tubes are placed in the sampler. The piston tip and attached piston rod ar e placed into the sampler from the bottom. The drive head is then screwed onto the top of the sampler. The piston stop -pin is screwed into the top of the drive head. The sampler is then attached to the 1-inch drive rods.
Undisturbed soil samples are collec ted by driving the sampler and rods to the target depth. The piston stop pin keeps the piston tip and rod from rising into the sampler. Subsequently, the probe-drive sampler remains sealed while it is pushed or driven to the desired sampling depth.
Once the target depth is reached, the piston stop -pin is removed by means of extension rods inserted down the inside diameter of the probe rods. The sampler is then pushed approximately 24 inches down, the piston tip and rod rise in the sampler on top of the intr uding soil. The rods and samplers are then retrieved. The sampler is disassembled, the sample tubes removed for sample logging, identification, and analysis, and the apparatus decontaminated prior to reuse.
The macro -core sampler consists of the sampler, c utting shoe, point assembly, drive head, sample sleeve, and (optional) sand catcher. Once assembled, the point assembly is placed in ATTACHMENT 2
A2-439
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 2
the cutting shoe and locked in place. The sample is then driven to the target depth. The point assembly is unlocked using e xtension rods lowered through the drive rods. The sampler is then driven another 4 feet. The sampler and drive rods are then retrieved, the sampler disassembled, and the sample tube removed for sample logging, identification, and analysis. The apparatus is then decontaminated prior to reuse.
On retrieval, the sample sleeve containing the soil samples were removed from the sampler, cut to the desired sample length, capped with Teflon TM sheeting, and sealed with polyethylene end caps. The sample tube was labe led with the project number, sample number, sample depth, collection date and time, and sampler’s initials. The soil samples were placed in sealable plastic bags and stored in a cooler chilled using ice to a temperature of approximately 4 degrees Celsius. These samples were used for chemical analysis, with the exception of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), by which subsamples collected by EPA Method 5035 were analyzed.
EPA 5035 Soil Sampling Procedures
If a soil sample was to be analyzed for TPHg or VOCs, the sample was collected in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 5035 and following the California Department Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Method 5035 Guidanc e Document, dated November 2004.
The sample from the sleeve was sub -cored using EPA Method 5035 sample preservation. A plastic syringe was used to collect four aliquots of approximately 5 grams of soil. The 5 -gram soil aliquot was ejected into a pre -weighed, laboratory supplied, 40 -milliliter volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials containing preservatives. A new syringe was used for each sampling interval.
A sample label was placed on the VOA vials with the sample number, location, and date recorded on the label. The VOA vials were placed in a Ziploc ® bag. VOA vials collected at a specific sample location and depth were placed in one Ziploc ® bag. The Ziploc ® bag and its contents were stored in a cooler chilled using ice to a temperature of approximately 4 de grees Celsius.
Soil Classification
Soil cuttings, the soil from the shoe of the sampler, and the remaining sleeves were evaluated and logged. Soil characterization information, including soil type (e.g., fill, native soil, or bedrock) were recorded on boring logs in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Soil descriptions, sample type and depth, texture, color, density or consistency, odor, ATTACHMENT 2
A2-440
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020 3
an estimate of soil moisture content, and related drilling information were recorded in genera l accordance with boring logs. Boring logs were reviewed by a Ninyo & Moore California licensed Professional Geologist.
Chain-of-Custody Documentation
Sample information including sample identification, date, time, analyses, sample, laboratory turn-around-time, number and type of containers, and preservation method were recorded on a chain-of-custody (COC). The COC was filled out and signed with the date and time by the sampler. The COC accompanied the samples. If the custody of the samples and COC were transferred, the COC was signed with the date and time by the releasing and new custodians.
Investigative-Derived Waste Procedures
Used personal protective equipment and disposable equipment were not considered hazardous and were double bagged and placed in a municipal refuse dumpster. PPE and disposable equipment that could still be reused were rendered inoperable before disposal in the refuse dumpster.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-441
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020
APPENDIX F
Geophysical Survey Reports
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-442
66XXEE66XXUUIIDDFFHH 66XXUUYYHH\\VV
&& AA ss ss oo cc ii aa tt ee ss ,, II nn cc ..
AAnn AApppplliieedd GGeeoopphhyyssiiccaall CCoommppaannyy 2075 Corte Del Nogal, Suite W
Carlsbad, CA 92011
Office: (760) 476-0492
Fax: (760) 476-0493
Subsurface Surveys & Associates, Inc. www. subsurfacesurveys.com [email protected] August 24, 2020
Project/Invoice No. 20-371A
Ninyo & Moore
475 Goddard, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92618
Attn: Keith Gilbert
Re: Geophysical Investigation Report, Burbank W&P, 320 North Lake Street, Burbank, California This report is to present the results of our geophysical survey carried out at Burbank W&P located at 320 North Lake Street, Burbank, California (Figure 1). The survey was performed on August 24, 2020, and its purpose was to locate and identify, insofar as possible, pipes, conduits, utilities, and other underground obstructions within the immediate vicinity of fourteen (14) proposed boreholes.
A combination of electromagnetic induction (EM), magnetometry, and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were brought to the field in anticipation of use. Utility locators with line tracing capabilities were also used where applicable.
FIGURE 1. Site location map.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-443
2 Survey Design – The survey site was located at an active power plant. The fourteen boreholes were located inside the facility with their exact location indicated in the field by the client.
For this particular site and survey objectives, the best use of time was achieved by systematically free- traversing with the instruments while monitoring them manually, continuously, and in real-time to determine which responses were significant and due to true subsurface targets, and which were due to other non-target or above-ground features and must be ignored (an example being nearby dumpsters). In these situations, the free-traversing method is advantageous in that it allows for immediate detection of anomalous objects and facilitates the opportunity to investigate them further despite any obstructions and without the need to first download data. Where applicable, and depending on location, the EM devices, magnetic gradiometer, and GPR were traversed systematically over the survey areas in multiple, organized directions. Other traverses were taken for detailing and confirmation where anomalous conditions were found.
In addition, the line tracers were used to impress signals onto pipes, generally through accessible risers and tracer wires when present, to delineate the lines’ locations and orientations. The instruments were also used in passive mode, configured to detect 60 Hz electrical signals and other common radio-frequency signals found in active electrical and communication lines.
A Geonic’s model EM61 and a Fischer TW-6 M-Scope was used for the EM sampling. A Sensors & Software Noggin Ground Penetrating Radar unit with a 500 MHz antenna produced the radar images. The magnetic gradiometer was a Schonstedt GA-52, and a Metrotech 9890 and RIDGID SR-60 SeekTech utility locator rounded out the tools applied.
Brief Description of the Geophysical Methods Applied – The EM61 instrument is a high resolution, time- domain device for detecting buried conductive objects. It consists of a powerful transmitter that generates a pulsed primary magnetic field when its coils are energized, which induces eddy currents in nearby conductive objects. The decay of the eddy currents, following the input pulse, is measured by the coils, which in turn serve as receiver coils. The decay rate is measured for two coils, mounted concentrically, one above the other. By making the measurements at a relatively long time interval (measured in milliseconds) after termination of the primary pulse, the response is nearly independent of the electrical conductivity of the ground. Thus, the instrument is a super-sensitive metal detector. Due to its unique coil arrangement, the response curve is a single well-defined positive peak directly over a buried conductive object. This facilitates quick and accurate location of targets.
The M-Scope device energizes the ground by producing an alternating primary magnetic field with AC current in a transmitting coil. If conducting materials are within the area of influence of the primary field, AC eddy currents are induced to flow in the conductors. A receiving coil senses the secondary magnetic field produced by these eddy currents, and outputs the response as anomalous conditions. The strength of the secondary field is a function of the conductivity of the object, say a pipe, tank or cluster of drums, its size, and its depth and position relative to the instrument's two coils. Conductive objects, to a depth of approximately 7 feet below ground surface (bgs) for the M-Scope are sensed. The device is also somewhat focused; that is, it is more sensitive to conductors below the instrument than they are to conductors off to the side.
The GPR instrument beams energy into the ground from its transducer/antenna, in the form of electromagnetic waves. A portion of this energy is reflected back to the antenna at a boundary in the ATTACHMENT 2
A2-444
3 subsurface across which there is an electrical contrast. The instrument produces a continuous record of the reflected energy as the antenna is traversed across the ground surface. The greater the electrical contrast, the higher the amplitude of the returned energy. The radar wave travels at a velocity unique to the material properties of the ground being investigated, and when these velocities are known, the two-way travel times can be converted to depth. The depth of penetration and image resolution produced are a function of ground electrical conductivity and dielectric constant.
The magnetic gradiometer has two flux gate magnetic fixed sensors that are passed closely to and over the ground. When not in close proximity to a magnetic object, that is, only in the earth's field, the instrument emits a sound signal at a low frequency. When the instrument passes over a buried iron or steel object, so that locally there is a high magnetic gradient, the frequency of the emitted sound increases. The frequency is a function of the gradient between the two sensors.
The line locator is used to passively detect energized high voltage electric lines and electrical conduit (50- 60 Hz), VLF signals (14-22 kHz), as well as to actively trace other utilities. Where risers are present, the utility locator transmitter can be connected directly to the object, and a signal (9.8-82 kHz) is sent traveling along the conductor, pipe, conduit, etc. In the absence of a riser, the transmitter can be used to impress an input signal on the utility by induction. In either case, the receiver unit is tuned to the input signal, and is used to actively trace the signal along the pipe’s surface projection.
Interpretation and Conclusions - The interpretation took place in real time as the survey progressed, and accordingly, the findings of our investigation were marked on the ground cover at the site using spray chalk, reported to the client, and are further documented with site photographs of all areas investigated (Figures 2- 15).
Items detected in the vicinity of the boreholes were marked in coordinated standard colors including red for electric, green for drain, blue for water, and white for lines of unknown utility type. Please review the site photographs for the locations and orientations of all items found within the vicinity of the boreholes.
At the conclusion of the survey, all boreholes were positioned in order to provide adequate clearance from detected obstructions. In their final locations, they were marked in white with a yellow “SSS” to indicate that each had been checked by company personnel.
Limitations and Further Recommendations - It should be understood that limitations inherent in geophysical instruments and/or surveying techniques exist at all sites, and nearly all sites exhibit conditions under which such might not perform optimally. Consequently, the detection of buried objects in all circumstances cannot be guaranteed. Such limitations are numerous and include, but are not limited to, rebar-reinforced ground cover, abrupt changes in ground cover type, above-ground obstacles preventing full traverses or traverses in one direction only, above-ground conductive objects interfering with instrument signal, nearby powerlines or EM transmitters, highly conductive background soil conditions, limited GPR penetration, non-metallic targets, shallower or larger objects shielding deeper or smaller targets, tracing signal jumping from one line to another, and inaccessible risers, cleanouts, valve boxes, and manholes. If one or more geophysical instrument is rendered ineffective and cannot be utilized, the quality of the survey can be somewhat degraded.
For the above reasons, and in the interest of maximum safety, we encourage our clients to take advantage of Underground Service Alert (USA), Dig Alert, or other similar services, when possible. Furthermore, we ATTACHMENT 2
A2-445
4 recommend hand-auguring and the use of a drilling method known as air knifing or vacuum extraction, when feasible or if applicable to this project. These methods may significantly limit damage to underground pipes, conduits, and utilities that might not have been detectable during the course of this survey. Please bear in mind, that geophysical surveying is only one of several levels of protection that is available to our clients.
SubSurface Surveys may include maps in some reports. While they are an accurate general representation of the site and our findings, they are not of engineering quality (i.e., measured and mapped by a licensed land surveyor).
SubSurface Surveys and Associates makes no guarantee either expressed or implied regarding the accuracy of the findings and interpretations present. And, in no event will SubSurface Surveys and Associates be liable for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages resulting from interpretations and opinions presented herewith.
All data generated on this project are in confidential file in this office, and are available for review by authorized persons at any time. The opportunity to participate in this investigation is very much appreciated. Please call, if there are questions.
Dustin Renck Travis Crosby
Staff Geophysicist, SubSurface Surveys CA State Geophysics Registration GP1044 Senior Geophysicist, SubSurface Surveys
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-446
TITLE:
SSS PROJECT NO:
%XUEDQN: 3
1RUWK/DNH6WUHHW
%XUEDQN&DOLIRUQLD
$
$XJXVW
SITE: SURVEY DATE:
PREPARED FOR:
1LQ\R 0RRUH
6LWH3KRWRJUDSKV
Figure 7Figure 6
Figure 5Figure 4
Figure 3Figure 2
%+ %+
%+
%+
%+
%+
%+
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-447
TITLE:
SSS PROJECT NO:
%XUEDQN: 3
1RUWK/DNH6WUHHW
%XUEDQN&DOLIRUQLD
$
$XJXVW
SITE: SURVEY DATE:
PREPARED FOR:
1LQ\R 0RRUH
6LWH3KRWRJUDSKV
Figure 13Figure 12
Figure 11Figure 10
Figure 9Figure 8
%+ %+
%+
%+
%+ %+
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-448
TITLE:
SSS PROJECT NO:
%XUEDQN: 3
1RUWK/DNH6WUHHW
%XUEDQN&DOLIRUQLD
$
$XJXVW
SITE: SURVEY DATE:
PREPARED FOR:
1LQ\R 0RRUH
6LWH3KRWRJUDSKV
Figure 15Figure 14
1R3KRWR 1R3KRWR
1R3KRWR 1R3KRWR
%+
%+
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-449
66XXEE66XXUUIIDDFFHH 66XXUUYYHH\\VV
&& AA ss ss oo cc ii aa tt ee ss ,, II nn cc ..
AAnn AApppplliieedd GGeeoopphhyyssiiccaall CCoommppaannyy 2075 Corte Del Nogal, Suite W
Carlsbad, CA 92011
Office: (760) 476-0492
Fax: (760) 476-0493
Subsurface Surveys & Associates, Inc. www. subsurfacesurveys.com [email protected] September 23, 2020
Project/Invoice No. 20-371B
Ninyo & Moore
475 Goddard, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92618
Attn: Keith Gilbert
Re: Geophysical Investigation Report, Burbank W&P, 320 North Lake Street, Burbank, California This report is to present the results of our geophysical survey carried out at Burbank W&P located at 320 North Lake Street, Burbank, California (Figure 1). The survey was performed on September 22, 2020, and its purpose was to locate and identify, insofar as possible, pipes, conduits, utilities, and other underground obstructions within the immediate vicinity of eight (8) proposed boreholes.
A combination of electromagnetic induction (EM), magnetometry, and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were brought to the field in anticipation of use. Utility locators with line tracing capabilities were also used where applicable.
FIGURE 1. Site location map.
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-450
2 Survey Design – The survey site was located near an active power plant. The eight boreholes were located outside the facility within North Varney Street. The exact location of each borehole was indicated in the field by the client.
For this particular site and survey objectives, the best use of time was achieved by systematically free- traversing with the instruments while monitoring them manually, continuously, and in real-time to determine which responses were significant and due to true subsurface targets, and which were due to other non-target or above-ground features and must be ignored (an example being nearby rebar reinforced concrete). In these situations, the free-traversing method is advantageous in that it allows for immediate detection of anomalous objects and facilitates the opportunity to investigate them further despite any obstructions and without the need to first download data. Where applicable, and depending on location, the EM devices, magnetic gradiometer, and GPR were traversed systematically over the survey areas in multiple, organized directions. Other traverses were taken for detailing and confirmation where anomalous conditions were found.
In addition, the line tracers were used to impress signals onto pipes, generally through accessible risers and tracer wires when present, to delineate the lines’ locations and orientations. The instruments were also used in passive mode, configured to detect 60 Hz electrical signals and other common radio-frequency signals found in active electrical and communication lines.
A Geonic’s model EM61 and a Fischer TW-6 M-Scope was used for the EM sampling. A Sensors & Software Noggin Ground Penetrating Radar unit with a 500 MHz antenna produced the radar images. The magnetic gradiometer was a Schonstedt GA-52, and a Metrotech 9890 and RIDGID SR-60 SeekTech utility locator rounded out the tools applied.
Brief Description of the Geophysical Methods Applied – The EM61 instrument is a high resolution, time- domain device for detecting buried conductive objects. It consists of a powerful transmitter that generates a pulsed primary magnetic field when its coils are energized, which induces eddy currents in nearby conductive objects. The decay of the eddy currents, following the input pulse, is measured by the coils, which in turn serve as receiver coils. The decay rate is measured for two coils, mounted concentrically, one above the other. By making the measurements at a relatively long time interval (measured in milliseconds) after termination of the primary pulse, the response is nearly independent of the electrical conductivity of the ground. Thus, the instrument is a super-sensitive metal detector. Due to its unique coil arrangement, the response curve is a single well-defined positive peak directly over a buried conductive object. This facilitates quick and accurate location of targets.
The M-Scope device energizes the ground by producing an alternating primary magnetic field with AC current in a transmitting coil. If conducting materials are within the area of influence of the primary field, AC eddy currents are induced to flow in the conductors. A receiving coil senses the secondary magnetic field produced by these eddy currents, and outputs the response as anomalous conditions. The strength of the secondary field is a function of the conductivity of the object, say a pipe, tank or cluster of drums, its size, and its depth and position relative to the instrument's two coils. Conductive objects, to a depth of approximately 7 feet below ground surface (bgs) for the M-Scope are sensed. The device is also somewhat focused; that is, it is more sensitive to conductors below the instrument than they are to conductors off to the side.
The GPR instrument beams energy into the ground from its transducer/antenna, in the form of ATTACHMENT 2
A2-451
3 electromagnetic waves. A portion of this energy is reflected back to the antenna at a boundary in the subsurface across which there is an electrical contrast. The instrument produces a continuous record of the reflected energy as the antenna is traversed across the ground surface. The greater the electrical contrast, the higher the amplitude of the returned energy. The radar wave travels at a velocity unique to the material properties of the ground being investigated, and when these velocities are known, the two-way travel times can be converted to depth. The depth of penetration and image resolution produced are a function of ground electrical conductivity and dielectric constant.
The magnetic gradiometer has two flux gate magnetic fixed sensors that are passed closely to and over the ground. When not in close proximity to a magnetic object, that is, only in the earth's field, the instrument emits a sound signal at a low frequency. When the instrument passes over a buried iron or steel object, so that locally there is a high magnetic gradient, the frequency of the emitted sound increases. The frequency is a function of the gradient between the two sensors.
The line locator is used to passively detect energized high voltage electric lines and electrical conduit (50- 60 Hz), VLF signals (14-22 kHz), as well as to actively trace other utilities. Where risers are present, the utility locator transmitter can be connected directly to the object, and a signal (9.8-82 kHz) is sent traveling along the conductor, pipe, conduit, etc. In the absence of a riser, the transmitter can be used to impress an input signal on the utility by induction. In either case, the receiver unit is tuned to the input signal, and is used to actively trace the signal along the pipe’s surface projection.
Interpretation and Conclusions - The interpretation took place in real time as the survey progressed, and accordingly, the findings of our investigation were marked on the ground cover at the site using spray chalk, reported to the client, and are further documented with site photographs of all areas investigated (Figures 2- 9).
Items detected in the vicinity of the boreholes were marked in coordinated standard colors including red for electric, green for drain, blue for water, and white for lines of unknown utility type. Please review the site photographs for the locations and orientations of all items found within the vicinity of the boreholes.
At the conclusion of the survey, all boreholes were positioned in order to provide adequate clearance from detected obstructions. In their final locations, they were marked in white with a yellow “SSS” to indicate that each had been checked by company personnel.
Limitations and Further Recommendations - It should be understood that limitations inherent in geophysical instruments and/or surveying techniques exist at all sites, and nearly all sites exhibit conditions under which such might not perform optimally. Consequently, the detection of buried objects in all circumstances cannot be guaranteed. Such limitations are numerous and include, but are not limited to, rebar-reinforced ground cover, abrupt changes in ground cover type, above-ground obstacles preventing full traverses or traverses in one direction only, above-ground conductive objects interfering with instrument signal, nearby powerlines or EM transmitters, highly conductive background soil conditions, limited GPR penetration, non-metallic targets, shallower or larger objects shielding deeper or smaller targets, tracing signal jumping from one line to another, and inaccessible risers, cleanouts, valve boxes, and manholes. If one or more geophysical instrument is rendered ineffective and cannot be utilized, the quality of the survey can be somewhat degraded.
For the above reasons, and in the interest of maximum safety, we encourage our clients to take advantage of ATTACHMENT 2
A2-452
4 Underground Service Alert (USA), Dig Alert, or other similar services, when possible. Furthermore, we recommend hand-auguring and the use of a drilling method known as air knifing or vacuum extraction, when feasible or if applicable to this project. These methods may significantly limit damage to underground pipes, conduits, and utilities that might not have been detectable during the course of this survey. Please bear in mind, that geophysical surveying is only one of several levels of protection that is available to our clients.
SubSurface Surveys may include maps in some reports. While they are an accurate general representation of the site and our findings, they are not of engineering quality (i.e., measured and mapped by a licensed land surveyor).
SubSurface Surveys and Associates makes no guarantee either expressed or implied regarding the accuracy of the findings and interpretations present. And, in no event will SubSurface Surveys and Associates be liable for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages resulting from interpretations and opinions presented herewith.
All data generated on this project are in confidential file in this office, and are available for review by authorized persons at any time. The opportunity to participate in this investigation is very much appreciated. Please call, if there are questions.
Dustin Renck Travis Crosby
Staff Geophysicist, SubSurface Surveys CA State Geophysics Registration GP1044 Senior Geophysicist, SubSurface Surveys
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-453
TITLE:
SSS PROJECT NO:
%XUEDQN: 3
1RUWK/DNH6WUHHW
%XUEDQN&DOLIRUQLD
%
6HSWHPEHU
SITE: SURVEY DATE:
PREPARED FOR:
1LQ\R 0RRUH
6LWH3KRWRJUDSKV
Figure 7Figure 6
Figure 5Figure 4
Figure 3Figure 2
%+
%+
%+
%+
%+ %+
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-454
TITLE:
SSS PROJECT NO:
%XUEDQN: 3
1RUWK/DNH6WUHHW
%XUEDQN&DOLIRUQLD
%
6HSWHPEHU
SITE: SURVEY DATE:
PREPARED FOR:
1LQ\R 0RRUH
6LWH3KRWRJUDSKV
Figure 9Figure 8
1R3KRWR 1R3KRWR
1R3KRWR 1R3KRWR
%+
%+
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-455
Ninyo & Moore | 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California | 211491001 | November 12, 2020
APPENDIX G
Analytical Laboratory Reports
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-456
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
September 01, 2020
Ninyo & Moore
Keith Gilbert
Attention: Keith Gilbert
RE: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia Power P
Workorder No.: N041960FAX: (949) 753-7071
TEL: (949) 753-7070
475 Goddard, Suite 200
Irvine, California 92618
Thank you for the opportunity to service the needs of your company.
Please feel free to call me at (562) 219-7435 if I can be of further assistance to your company.
Sincerely,
Andrew Garaniel
Laboratory Director
Enclosed are the results for sample(s) received on August 24, 2020 by ASSET Laboratories. The sample(s) are tested for the parameters as indicated in the enclosed chain of custody in accordance with the applicable laboratory certifications.
The cover letter is an integral part of this analytical report. This Laboratory Report cannot be reproduced in part or in its entiret y without written permission from the client and ASSET Laboratories - California. 1o f4 1
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-457
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
01-Sep-20Date:ASSET Laboratories
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
CASE NARRATIVE
SAMPLE RECEIVING/GENERAL COMMENTS:
All sample containers were received intact with proper chain of custody documentation.
Information on sample receipt conditions includingdiscrepancies can be found in attached Sample Receipt Checklist Form.
Cooler temperature and sample preservation were verified upon receipt of samples if applicable.
Samples were analyzed within method holding time.
Analytical Comments for EPA 8260B:
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery biased high for 1,1-Dichloropropene. Sample results were non-detect (ND) therefore reanalysis of the samples was not necessary.
Analytical comments for EPA 6010B:
Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) are outside recovery criteria on some analytes possibly due to matrix interference. The associated Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery was acceptable.
Analytical comments for EPA 7471A:
Matrix Spike (MS) is outside recovery criteria possibly due to matrix interference. The associated Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery was acceptable. 2o f4 1
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-458
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
01-Sep-20Date:ASSET Laboratories
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection DateMatrix Date Received Contract No:
Date Reported
N041960-001A B10-10 8/24/2020 9:33:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-001B B10-10 8/24/2020 9:33:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-001C B10-10 8/24/2020 9:33:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-001D B10-10 8/24/2020 9:33:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-001E B10-10 8/24/2020 9:33:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-001F B10-10 8/24/2020 9:33:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-002A B10-21 8/24/2020 9:39:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-002B B10-21 8/24/2020 9:39:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-002C B10-21 8/24/2020 9:39:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-002D B10-21 8/24/2020 9:39:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-002E B10-21 8/24/2020 9:39:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-002F B10-21 8/24/2020 9:39:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-003A B15-5 8/24/2020 1:28:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-003B B15-5 8/24/2020 1:28:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-003C B15-5 8/24/2020 1:28:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-003D B15-5 8/24/2020 1:28:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-003E B15-5 8/24/2020 1:28:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-003F B15-5 8/24/2020 1:28:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-004A B15-10 8/24/2020 1:32:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-004B B15-10 8/24/2020 1:32:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-004C B15-10 8/24/2020 1:32:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-004D B15-10 8/24/2020 1:32:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-004E B15-10 8/24/2020 1:32:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-004F B15-10 8/24/2020 1:32:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-005A B12-5 8/24/2020 10:43:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-005B B12-5 8/24/2020 10:43:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-005C B12-5 8/24/2020 10:43:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-005D B12-5 8/24/2020 10:43:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-005E B12-5 8/24/2020 10:43:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil 3o f4 1
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-459
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection DateMatrix Date Received Contract No:
Date Reported
N041960-005F B12-5 8/24/2020 10:43:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-006A B12-15 8/24/2020 10:48:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-006B B12-15 8/24/2020 10:48:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-006C B12-15 8/24/2020 10:48:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-006D B12-15 8/24/2020 10:48:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-006E B12-15 8/24/2020 10:48:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-006F B12-15 8/24/2020 10:48:00 AM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-007A B9-5 8/24/2020 2:20:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-007B B9-5 8/24/2020 2:20:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-007C B9-5 8/24/2020 2:20:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-007D B9-5 8/24/2020 2:20:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-007E B9-5 8/24/2020 2:20:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-007F B9-5 8/24/2020 2:20:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-008A B9-15 8/24/2020 2:27:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-008B B9-15 8/24/2020 2:27:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-008C B9-15 8/24/2020 2:27:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-008D B9-15 8/24/2020 2:27:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-008E B9-15 8/24/2020 2:27:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil N041960-008F B9-15 8/24/2020 2:27:00 PM 8/24/2020 9/1/2020Soil 4o f4 1
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-460
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B10-10
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 9:33:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-001
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM9.1 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/29/2020 06:54 PM45 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
5o f4 1
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-461
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B10-10
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 9:33:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-001
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM9.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/29/2020 06:54 PM4.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 S 8/29/2020 06:54 PM70-156 %REC 1157 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/29/2020 06:54 PM73-129 %REC 184.7 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/29/2020 06:54 PM73-146 %REC 1138 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/29/2020 06:54 PM80-120 %REC 195.0
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC1_200829A 81973QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/28/2020 DRO 8/30/2020 01:05 AM10 mg/Kg 1ND
ORO 8/30/2020 01:05 AM10 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: p-Terphenyl 8/30/2020 01:05 AM56-133 %REC 198.4
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
6o f4 1
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-462
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B10-10
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 9:33:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-001
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200825A Q20VS029QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/25/2020 GRO 8/25/2020 12:40 PM0.96 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/25/2020 12:40 PM47-163 %REC 1130
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 12:53 PM0.099 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 08:31 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 08:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 08:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1150
Beryllium 8/26/2020 08:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 08:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 08:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 121
Cobalt 8/26/2020 08:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 114
Copper 8/26/2020 08:31 PM2.0 mg/Kg 124
Lead 8/26/2020 08:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 16.9
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 08:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 08:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 116
Selenium 8/26/2020 08:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 08:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 08:31 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 08:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 152
Zinc 8/26/2020 08:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 155
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
7o f4 1
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-463
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B10-21
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 9:39:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-002
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM11 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/29/2020 07:50 PM57 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
8o f4 1
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-464
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B10-21
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 9:39:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-002
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM11 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/29/2020 07:50 PM5.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/29/2020 07:50 PM70-156 %REC 1113 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/29/2020 07:50 PM73-129 %REC 196.5 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/29/2020 07:50 PM73-146 %REC 1109 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/29/2020 07:50 PM80-120 %REC 195.0
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC1_200829A 81973QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/28/2020 DRO 8/30/2020 01:35 AM10 mg/Kg 1ND
ORO 8/30/2020 01:35 AM10 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: p-Terphenyl 8/30/2020 01:35 AM56-133 %REC 1106
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
9o f4 1
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-465
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B10-21
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 9:39:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-002
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200825A Q20VS029QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/25/2020 GRO 8/25/2020 01:11 PM1.1 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/25/2020 01:11 PM47-163 %REC 1118
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 12:56 PM0.099 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 08:37 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 08:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 08:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 171
Beryllium 8/26/2020 08:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 08:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 08:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 17.6
Cobalt 8/26/2020 08:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 16.4
Copper 8/26/2020 08:37 PM2.0 mg/Kg 17.6
Lead 8/26/2020 08:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 08:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 08:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 14.8
Selenium 8/26/2020 08:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 08:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 08:37 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 08:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 125
Zinc 8/26/2020 08:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 119
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
10 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-466
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B15-5
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 1:28:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-003
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM13 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/29/2020 08:15 PM66 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
11 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-467
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B15-5
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 1:28:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-003
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM13 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/29/2020 08:15 PM6.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/29/2020 08:15 PM70-156 %REC 1107 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/29/2020 08:15 PM73-129 %REC 186.9 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/29/2020 08:15 PM73-146 %REC 1105 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/29/2020 08:15 PM80-120 %REC 194.5
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC1_200829A 81973QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/28/2020 DRO 8/30/2020 02:05 AM9.9 mg/Kg 115
ORO 8/30/2020 02:05 AM9.9 mg/Kg 117
Surr: p-Terphenyl 8/30/2020 02:05 AM56-133 %REC 198.1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
12 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-468
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B15-5
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 1:28:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-003
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200825A Q20VS029QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/25/2020 GRO 8/25/2020 01:42 PM1.1 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/25/2020 01:42 PM47-163 %REC 1117
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 01:00 PM0.10 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 08:43 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 08:43 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 08:43 PM1.0 mg/Kg 140
Beryllium 8/26/2020 08:43 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 08:43 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 08:43 PM1.0 mg/Kg 15.1
Cobalt 8/26/2020 08:43 PM1.0 mg/Kg 14.1
Copper 8/26/2020 08:43 PM2.0 mg/Kg 14.4
Lead 8/26/2020 08:43 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 08:43 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 08:43 PM1.0 mg/Kg 13.2
Selenium 8/26/2020 08:43 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 08:43 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 08:43 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 08:43 PM1.0 mg/Kg 116
Zinc 8/26/2020 08:43 PM1.0 mg/Kg 116
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
13 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-469
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B15-10
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 1:32:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-004
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM11 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/29/2020 08:40 PM56 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
14 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-470
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B15-10
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 1:32:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-004
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM11 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/29/2020 08:40 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/29/2020 08:40 PM70-156 %REC 1120 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/29/2020 08:40 PM73-129 %REC 189.9 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/29/2020 08:40 PM73-146 %REC 1108 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/29/2020 08:40 PM80-120 %REC 1104
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC1_200829A 81973QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/28/2020 DRO 8/30/2020 02:35 AM10 mg/Kg 1ND
ORO 8/30/2020 02:35 AM10 mg/Kg 111
Surr: p-Terphenyl 8/30/2020 02:35 AM56-133 %REC 198.5
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
15 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-471
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B15-10
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 1:32:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-004
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200825A Q20VS029QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/25/2020 GRO 8/25/2020 02:13 PM0.94 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/25/2020 02:13 PM47-163 %REC 1117
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 01:03 PM0.10 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 08:49 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 08:49 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 08:49 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1150
Beryllium 8/26/2020 08:49 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 08:49 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 08:49 PM1.0 mg/Kg 123
Cobalt 8/26/2020 08:49 PM1.0 mg/Kg 114
Copper 8/26/2020 08:49 PM2.0 mg/Kg 123
Lead 8/26/2020 08:49 PM1.0 mg/Kg 11.6
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 08:49 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 08:49 PM1.0 mg/Kg 117
Selenium 8/26/2020 08:49 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 08:49 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 08:49 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 08:49 PM1.0 mg/Kg 154
Zinc 8/26/2020 08:49 PM1.0 mg/Kg 150
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
16 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-472
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B12-5
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 10:43:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-005
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM8.8 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/29/2020 09:07 PM44 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
17 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-473
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B12-5
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 10:43:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-005
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM8.8 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/29/2020 09:07 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/29/2020 09:07 PM70-156 %REC 198.7 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:07 PM73-129 %REC 182.6 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/29/2020 09:07 PM73-146 %REC 188.9 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/29/2020 09:07 PM80-120 %REC 194.2
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC1_200829A 81973QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/28/2020 DRO 8/30/2020 03:05 AM9.9 mg/Kg 113
ORO 8/30/2020 03:05 AM9.9 mg/Kg 116
Surr: p-Terphenyl 8/30/2020 03:05 AM56-133 %REC 195.6
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
18 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-474
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B12-5
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 10:43:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-005
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200825A Q20VS029QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/25/2020 GRO 8/25/2020 02:44 PM0.91 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/25/2020 02:44 PM47-163 %REC 1120
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 01:07 PM0.10 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 08:55 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 08:55 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 08:55 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1150
Beryllium 8/26/2020 08:55 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 08:55 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 08:55 PM1.0 mg/Kg 121
Cobalt 8/26/2020 08:55 PM1.0 mg/Kg 114
Copper 8/26/2020 08:55 PM2.0 mg/Kg 123
Lead 8/26/2020 08:55 PM1.0 mg/Kg 14.9
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 08:55 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 08:55 PM1.0 mg/Kg 116
Selenium 8/26/2020 08:55 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 08:55 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 08:55 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 08:55 PM1.0 mg/Kg 149
Zinc 8/26/2020 08:55 PM1.0 mg/Kg 156
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
19 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-475
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B12-15
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 10:48:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-006
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM8.2 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/29/2020 09:32 PM41 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
20 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-476
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B12-15
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 10:48:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-006
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM8.2 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/29/2020 09:32 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/29/2020 09:32 PM70-156 %REC 1114 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:32 PM73-129 %REC 181.3 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/29/2020 09:32 PM73-146 %REC 1106 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/29/2020 09:32 PM80-120 %REC 196.6
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC1_200829A 81973QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/28/2020 DRO 8/30/2020 03:36 AM10 mg/Kg 111
ORO 8/30/2020 03:36 AM10 mg/Kg 114
Surr: p-Terphenyl 8/30/2020 03:36 AM56-133 %REC 199.0
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
21 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-477
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B12-15
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 10:48:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-006
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200825A Q20VS029QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/25/2020 GRO 8/25/2020 03:15 PM0.83 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/25/2020 03:15 PM47-163 %REC 1117
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 01:10 PM0.099 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 09:01 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 09:01 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 09:01 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1230
Beryllium 8/26/2020 09:01 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 09:01 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 09:01 PM1.0 mg/Kg 129
Cobalt 8/26/2020 09:01 PM1.0 mg/Kg 118
Copper 8/26/2020 09:01 PM2.0 mg/Kg 134
Lead 8/26/2020 09:01 PM1.0 mg/Kg 12.6
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 09:01 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 09:01 PM1.0 mg/Kg 122
Selenium 8/26/2020 09:01 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 09:01 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 09:01 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 09:01 PM1.0 mg/Kg 166
Zinc 8/26/2020 09:01 PM1.0 mg/Kg 164
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
22 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-478
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B9-5
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 2:20:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-007
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM9.2 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/29/2020 09:56 PM46 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
23 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-479
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B9-5
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 2:20:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-007
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM9.2 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/29/2020 09:56 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/29/2020 09:56 PM70-156 %REC 1126 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/29/2020 09:56 PM73-129 %REC 190.0 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/29/2020 09:56 PM73-146 %REC 1113 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/29/2020 09:56 PM80-120 %REC 194.6
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC1_200829A 81973QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/28/2020 DRO 8/30/2020 04:06 AM10 mg/Kg 162
ORO 8/30/2020 04:06 AM10 mg/Kg 1120
Surr: p-Terphenyl 8/30/2020 04:06 AM56-133 %REC 195.5
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
24 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-480
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B9-5
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 2:20:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-007
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200825A Q20VS029QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/25/2020 GRO 8/25/2020 03:47 PM0.94 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/25/2020 03:47 PM47-163 %REC 1112
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 01:13 PM0.10 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 09:08 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 09:08 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 09:08 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1160
Beryllium 8/26/2020 09:08 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 09:08 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 09:08 PM1.0 mg/Kg 123
Cobalt 8/26/2020 09:08 PM1.0 mg/Kg 115
Copper 8/26/2020 09:08 PM2.0 mg/Kg 126
Lead 8/26/2020 09:08 PM1.0 mg/Kg 112
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 09:08 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 09:08 PM1.0 mg/Kg 117
Selenium 8/26/2020 09:08 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 09:08 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 09:08 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 09:08 PM1.0 mg/Kg 154
Zinc 8/26/2020 09:08 PM1.0 mg/Kg 171
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
25 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-481
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B9-15
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 2:27:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-008
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM8.3 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/29/2020 10:21 PM41 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
26 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-482
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B9-15
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 2:27:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-008
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM8.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/29/2020 10:21 PM4.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/29/2020 10:21 PM70-156 %REC 1118 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/29/2020 10:21 PM73-129 %REC 191.6 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/29/2020 10:21 PM73-146 %REC 1112 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/29/2020 10:21 PM80-120 %REC 194.9
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC1_200829A 81973QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/28/2020 DRO 8/30/2020 04:36 AM9.9 mg/Kg 113
ORO 8/30/2020 04:36 AM9.9 mg/Kg 115
Surr: p-Terphenyl 8/30/2020 04:36 AM56-133 %REC 197.2
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
27 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-483
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B9-15
Collection Date: 8/24/2020 2:27:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041960
DF
Lab ID: N041960-008
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 01-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200825A Q20VS029QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/25/2020 GRO 8/25/2020 04:18 PM0.87 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/25/2020 04:18 PM47-163 %REC 1116
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 01:24 PM0.10 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 09:14 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 09:14 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 09:14 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1240
Beryllium 8/26/2020 09:14 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 09:14 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 09:14 PM1.0 mg/Kg 129
Cobalt 8/26/2020 09:14 PM1.0 mg/Kg 119
Copper 8/26/2020 09:14 PM2.0 mg/Kg 135
Lead 8/26/2020 09:14 PM1.0 mg/Kg 12.8
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 09:14 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 09:14 PM1.0 mg/Kg 123
Selenium 8/26/2020 09:14 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 09:14 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 09:14 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 09:14 PM1.0 mg/Kg 167
Zinc 8/26/2020 09:14 PM1.0 mg/Kg 166
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
28 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-484
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
01-Sep-20Date:ASSET Laboratories
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041960 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 6010_S
Sample ID: MB-81915
Batch ID: 81915 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 146949
SeqNo: 3916108
MBLKSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Antimony 2.0 ND
Arsenic 1.0ND
Barium 1.0 ND
Beryllium 1.0ND
Cadmium 1.0ND
Chromium 1.0ND
Cobalt 1.0ND
Copper 2.0 ND
Lead 1.0ND
Molybdenum 1.0ND
Nickel 1.0 ND
Selenium 1.0 ND
Silver 1.0ND
Thallium 2.0ND
Vanadium 1.0ND
Zinc 1.0ND
Sample ID: LCS-81915
Batch ID: 81915 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 146949
SeqNo: 3916109
LCSSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Antimony 25.00 103 80 1202.0 025.833
Arsenic 25.00 102 80 1201.0 025.580
Barium 25.00 104 80 1201.0 025.938
Beryllium 25.00 101 80 1201.0 025.211
Cadmium 25.00 99.9 80 1201.0 024.981
Chromium 25.00 102 80 1201.0 025.539
Cobalt 25.00 101 80 1201.0 025.359
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 29 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-485
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041960 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 6010_S
Sample ID: LCS-81915
Batch ID: 81915 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 146949
SeqNo: 3916109
LCSSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Copper 25.00 102 80 1202.0 025.517
Lead 25.00 103 80 1201.0 025.629
Molybdenum 25.00 99.0 80 1201.0 024.738
Nickel 25.00 102 80 1201.0 025.508
Selenium 25.00 101 80 1201.0 025.127
Silver 25.00 107 80 1201.0 026.655
Thallium 25.00 98.9 80 1202.0 024.713
Vanadium 25.00 102 80 1201.0 025.433
Zinc 25.00 107 80 1201.0 026.691
Sample ID: N041950-003A-MS
Batch ID: 81915 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 146949
SeqNo: 3916115
MSSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Antimony 24.99 66.1 75 125 S2.0 016.515
Arsenic 24.99 91.5 75 1251.0 12.8435.707
Barium 24.99 104 75 1251.0 154.1180.034
Beryllium 24.99 83.6 75 1251.0 020.881
Cadmium 24.99 85.0 75 1251.0 1.00622.240
Chromium 24.99 87.6 75 1251.0 17.8639.759
Cobalt 24.99 91.5 75 1251.0 8.27131.127
Copper 24.99 92.6 75 1252.0 22.4045.551
Lead 24.99 63.9 75 125 S1.0 68.4284.382
Molybdenum 24.99 80.7 75 1251.0 020.163
Nickel 24.99 82.9 75 1251.0 13.9534.663
Selenium 24.99 77.1 75 1251.0 019.276
Silver 24.99 70.0 75 125 S1.0 017.483
Thallium 24.99 78.4 75 1252.0 019.598
Vanadium 24.99 109 75 1251.0 36.5663.786
Zinc 24.99 34.2 75 125 S1.0 146.2154.773
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 30 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-486
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041960 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 6010_S
Sample ID: N041950-003A-MSD
Batch ID: 81915 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 146949
SeqNo: 3916116
MSDSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Antimony 25.01 68.5 75 125 20 S2.0 0 16.52 3.7117.139
Arsenic 25.01 89.1 75 125 201.0 12.84 35.71 1.6635.118
Barium 25.01 83.8 75 125 201.0 154.1 180.0 2.82175.033
Beryllium 25.01 83.6 75 125 201.0 0 20.88 0.18120.919
Cadmium 25.01 84.6 75 125 201.0 1.006 22.24 0.35822.161 Chromium 25.01 85.4 75 125 201.0 17.86 39.76 1.3439.227 Cobalt 25.01 91.6 75 125 201.0 8.271 31.13 0.19031.186
Copper 25.01 90.3 75 125 202.0 22.40 45.55 1.2544.985
Lead 25.01 59.8 75 125 20 S1.0 68.42 84.38 1.2183.371
Molybdenum 25.01 83.9 75 125 201.0 0 20.16 3.9920.984
Nickel 25.01 81.6 75 125 201.0 13.95 34.66 0.87534.361
Selenium 25.01 79.3 75 125 201.0 0 19.28 2.8019.824
Silver 25.01 70.9 75 125 20 S1.0 0 17.48 1.4117.731
Thallium 25.01 80.0 75 125 202.0 0 19.60 2.0920.013
Vanadium 25.01 101 75 125 201.0 36.56 63.79 3.0861.849
Zinc 25.01 10.8 75 125 20 S1.0 146.2 154.8 3.85148.922
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 31 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-487
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041960 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 7471_S
Sample ID: MB-81918
Batch ID: 81918 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 146926
SeqNo: 3915117
MBLKSampType: TestCode: 7471_S
Mercury 0.10ND
Sample ID: LCS-81918
Batch ID: 81918 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 146926
SeqNo: 3915118
LCSSampType: TestCode: 7471_S
Mercury 0.4167 109 80 1200.10 00.454
Sample ID: N041950-003A-MS
Batch ID: 81918 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 146926
SeqNo: 3915124
MSSampType: TestCode: 7471_S
Mercury 0.4160 128 75 125 S0.10 0.11940.654
Sample ID: N041950-003A-MSD
Batch ID: 81918 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 146926
SeqNo: 3915125
MSDSampType: TestCode: 7471_S
Mercury 0.4133 106 75 125 200.099 0.1194 0.6539 15.70.559 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 32 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-488
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041960 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8015_S_DM H
Sample ID: MB-81973
Batch ID: 81973 TestNo: EPA 8015B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date: 8/28/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 147033
SeqNo: 3920662
MBLKSampType: TestCode: 8015_S_DM H
EPA 3550B
DRO 10 5.236
ORO 104.727
Surr: p-Terphenyl 80.00 98.4 56 13378.706
Sample ID: LCS-81973
Batch ID: 81973 TestNo: EPA 8015B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date: 8/28/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 147033
SeqNo: 3920663
LCSSampType: TestCode: 8015_S_DM H
EPA 3550B
DRO 1000 96.0 69 12310 0960.486
Surr: p-Terphenyl 80.00 85.5 56 13368.397
Sample ID: N041938-001A-MS
Batch ID: 81973 TestNo: EPA 8015B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date: 8/28/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 147033
SeqNo: 3920665
MSSampType: TestCode: 8015_S_DM H
EPA 3550B
DRO 995.0 86.2 46 14210 8.440866.481
Surr: p-Terphenyl 79.60 60.6 56 13348.263
Sample ID: N041938-001A-MSD
Batch ID: 81973 TestNo: EPA 8015B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date: 8/28/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 147033
SeqNo: 3920666
MSDSampType: TestCode: 8015_S_DM H
EPA 3550B
DRO 998.0 86.6 46 142 2010 8.440 866.5 0.753873.032
Surr: p-Terphenyl 79.84 69.2 56 133 055.282
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 33 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-489
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041960 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8015GAS_5035P
Sample ID: Q200825LCS
Batch ID: Q20VS029 TestNo: EPA 8015B Analysis Date: 8/25/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 146894
SeqNo: 3913325
LCSSampType: TestCode: 8015GAS_503
GRO 5.000 111 72 1361.0 05.544
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 100.0 109 47 163108.656
Sample ID: Q200825LCSD
Batch ID: Q20VS029 TestNo: EPA 8015B Analysis Date: 8/25/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS02
RunNo: 146894
SeqNo: 3913326
LCSDSampType: TestCode: 8015GAS_503
GRO 5.000 110 72 136 201.0 0 5.544 0.8885.495
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 100.0 107 47 163 0106.532
Sample ID: Q200825MB
Batch ID: Q20VS029 TestNo: EPA 8015B Analysis Date: 8/25/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 146894
SeqNo: 3913327
MBLKSampType: TestCode: 8015GAS_503
GRO 1.0ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 100.0 123 47 163122.524
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 34 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-490
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041960 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8260SOIL5035
Sample ID: CA200829-LCS
Batch ID: CA20VS137 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 147028
SeqNo: 3920456
LCSSampType: TestCode: 8260SOIL503
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 40.00 108 78 1275.0 043.150
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 40.00 109 75 1285.0 043.440
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 40.00 92.4 78 126 5.0 036.950 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 40.00 101 80 120 5.0 040.280
1,1-Dichloroethane 40.00 102 65 1365.0 040.990
1,1-Dichloroethene 40.00 110 66 1345.0 044.160
1,1-Dichloropropene 40.00 139 79 128 S5.0 055.560
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 40.00 96.8 80 1205.0 038.730
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 40.00 103 79 123 5.0 041.300
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 40.00 89.1 74 1215.0 035.640
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 40.00 119 79 1285.0 047.790
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 40.00 87.2 65 131 10 034.860 1,2-Dibromoethane 40.00 83.1 79 1245.0 033.240
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 109 80 120 5.0 043.500
1,2-Dichloroethane 40.00 95.3 80 1205.0 038.110
1,2-Dichloropropane 40.00 97.4 80 1205.0 038.940
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 40.00 122 76 1295.0 048.650
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 108 80 1205.0 043.310
1,3-Dichloropropane 40.00 99.7 80 120 5.0 039.890
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 103 80 1205.0 041.160
2,2-Dichloropropane 40.00 101 66 1365.0 040.500
2-Butanone 400.0 113 54 14550 0452.970
2-Chlorotoluene 40.00 111 78 124 5.0 044.290
4-Chlorotoluene 40.00 113 79 1255.0 045.190
4-Isopropyltoluene 40.00 119 75 1305.0 047.760
Benzene 40.00 116 80 1205.0 046.290
Bromobenzene 40.00 103 80 1205.0 041.180
Bromodichloromethane 40.00 102 80 127 5.0 040.900
Bromoform 40.00 92.0 67 1365.0 036.790
Bromomethane 40.00 110 45 1485.0 043.990
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 35 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-491
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041960 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8260SOIL5035
Sample ID: CA200829-LCS
Batch ID: CA20VS137 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 147028
SeqNo: 3920456
LCSSampType: TestCode: 8260SOIL503
Carbon tetrachloride 40.00 105 75 1375.0 042.040
Chlorobenzene 40.00 106 80 1205.0 042.600
Chloroethane 40.00 129 64 1455.0 051.710
Chloroform 40.00 96.6 75 1205.0 038.650
Chloromethane 40.00 98.2 58 1395.0 039.270
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 40.00 97.7 76 1205.0 039.090
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 40.00 87.5 77 1285.0 034.980
Dibromochloromethane 40.00 88.7 79 1245.0 035.490
Dibromomethane 40.00 85.0 80 120 5.0 033.980
Dichlorodifluoromethane 40.00 94.5 64 1375.0 037.790
Ethylbenzene 40.00 114 79 1205.0 045.480
Freon-113 40.00 114 58 1415.0 045.780
Hexachlorobutadiene 40.00 105 72 1265.0 041.860
Isopropylbenzene 40.00 118 62 130 5.0 047.050
m,p-Xylene 80.00 113 80 12410 090.470
Methylene chloride 40.00 110 65 1365.0 043.870
MTBE 40.00 90.9 65 1305.0 036.340
n-Butylbenzene 40.00 123 76 1335.0 049.120
n-Propylbenzene 40.00 123 76 131 5.0 049.160
Naphthalene 40.00 83.4 58 1275.0 033.380
o-Xylene 40.00 102 75 1215.0 040.950
sec-Butylbenzene 40.00 122 76 133 5.0 048.680
Styrene 40.00 109 80 1205.0 043.460
tert-Butylbenzene 40.00 111 73 1305.0 044.300
Tetrachloroethene 40.00 124 77 1245.0 049.410
Toluene 40.00 99.2 79 1205.0 039.690
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 40.00 103 72 1295.0 041.220
Trichloroethene 40.00 116 80 120 5.0 046.560
Trichlorofluoromethane 40.00 116 66 1465.0 046.220
Vinyl chloride 40.00 112 68 1415.0 044.780
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 36 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-492
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041960 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8260SOIL5035
Sample ID: CA200829-LCS
Batch ID: CA20VS137 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 147028
SeqNo: 3920456
LCSSampType: TestCode: 8260SOIL503
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.00 102 70 15651.160
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 50.00 98.4 73 12949.180
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 50.00 98.6 73 14649.280
Surr: Toluene-d8 50.00 95.3 80 120 47.630
Sample ID: CA200829-LCSD
Batch ID: CA20VS137 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS02
RunNo: 147028
SeqNo: 3920457
LCSDSampType: TestCode: 8260SOIL503
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 40.00 104 78 127 205.0 0 43.15 3.9741.470 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 40.00 99.7 75 128 205.0 0 43.44 8.5539.880 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 40.00 103 78 126 205.0 0 36.95 10.541.060 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 40.00 97.0 80 120 205.0 0 40.28 3.7738.790 1,1-Dichloroethane 40.00 100 65 136 205.0 0 40.99 2.2740.070 1,1-Dichloroethene 40.00 105 66 134 205.0 0 44.16 4.7542.110 1,1-Dichloropropene 40.00 123 79 128 205.0 0 55.56 12.049.280 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 40.00 100 80 120 205.0 0 38.73 3.3040.030 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 40.00 105 79 123 205.0 0 41.30 2.1142.180 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 40.00 92.0 74 121 205.0 0 35.64 3.2336.810 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 40.00 118 79 128 205.0 0 47.79 1.1647.240 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 40.00 94.3 65 131 2010 0 34.86 7.8837.720 1,2-Dibromoethane 40.00 88.9 79 124 205.0 0 33.24 6.7235.550 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 108 80 120 205.0 0 43.50 1.0243.060 1,2-Dichloroethane 40.00 98.3 80 120 205.0 0 38.11 3.1539.330 1,2-Dichloropropane 40.00 94.6 80 120 205.0 0 38.94 2.8737.840 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 40.00 117 76 129 205.0 0 48.65 3.8646.810 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 104 80 120 205.0 0 43.31 3.6741.750 1,3-Dichloropropane 40.00 100 80 120 205.0 0 39.89 0.50040.090 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 106 80 120 205.0 0 41.16 3.1142.460 2,2-Dichloropropane 40.00 91.6 66 136 205.0 0 40.50 10.036.630 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 37 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-493
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041960 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8260SOIL5035
Sample ID: CA200829-LCSD
Batch ID: CA20VS137 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS02
RunNo: 147028
SeqNo: 3920457
LCSDSampType: TestCode: 8260SOIL503
2-Butanone 400.0 119 54 145 2050 0 453.0 5.29477.570
2-Chlorotoluene 40.00 106 78 124 205.0 0 44.29 4.5742.310 4-Chlorotoluene 40.00 111 79 125 205.0 0 45.19 1.4544.540 4-Isopropyltoluene 40.00 116 75 130 205.0 0 47.76 2.9746.360 Benzene 40.00 113 80 120 205.0 0 46.29 2.4545.170
Bromobenzene 40.00 105 80 120 205.0 0 41.18 2.4042.180
Bromodichloromethane 40.00 103 80 127 205.0 0 40.90 0.53641.120 Bromoform 40.00 99.8 67 136 205.0 0 36.79 8.1439.910
Bromomethane 40.00 109 45 148 205.0 0 43.99 0.89143.600 Carbon tetrachloride 40.00 98.9 75 137 205.0 0 42.04 6.1039.550 Chlorobenzene 40.00 103 80 120 205.0 0 42.60 3.6341.080 Chloroethane 40.00 128 64 145 205.0 0 51.71 0.60151.400 Chloroform 40.00 98.2 75 120 205.0 0 38.65 1.5739.260
Chloromethane 40.00 103 58 139 205.0 0 39.27 4.4841.070 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 40.00 91.3 76 120 205.0 0 39.09 6.7736.530 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 40.00 88.6 77 128 205.0 0 34.98 1.3335.450 Dibromochloromethane 40.00 91.0 79 124 205.0 0 35.49 2.4836.380 Dibromomethane 40.00 96.9 80 120 205.0 0 33.98 13.138.750 Dichlorodifluoromethane 40.00 88.5 64 137 205.0 0 37.79 6.5635.390 Ethylbenzene 40.00 109 79 120 205.0 0 45.48 4.0843.660
Freon-113 40.00 98.2 58 141 205.0 0 45.78 15.339.290
Hexachlorobutadiene 40.00 97.6 72 126 205.0 0 41.86 7.0239.020 Isopropylbenzene 40.00 112 62 130 205.0 0 47.05 4.5444.960 m,p-Xylene 80.00 110 80 124 2010 0 90.47 2.3788.350
Methylene chloride 40.00 101 65 136 205.0 0 43.87 8.5340.280 MTBE 40.00 87.1 65 130 205.0 0 36.34 4.1934.850
n-Butylbenzene 40.00 116 76 133 205.0 0 49.12 5.7646.370 n-Propylbenzene 40.00 119 76 131 205.0 0 49.16 2.9347.740 Naphthalene 40.00 91.0 58 127 205.0 0 33.38 8.6836.410
o-Xylene 40.00 101 75 121 205.0 0 40.95 1.2540.440
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 38 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-494
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041960 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8260SOIL5035
Sample ID: CA200829-LCSD
Batch ID: CA20VS137 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS02
RunNo: 147028
SeqNo: 3920457
LCSDSampType: TestCode: 8260SOIL503
sec-Butylbenzene 40.00 119 76 133 205.0 0 48.68 1.9747.730 Styrene 40.00 116 80 120 205.0 0 43.46 6.2046.240
tert-Butylbenzene 40.00 108 73 130 205.0 0 44.30 2.3343.280 Tetrachloroethene 40.00 113 77 124 205.0 0 49.41 9.2845.030 Toluene 40.00 97.7 79 120 205.0 0 39.69 1.5739.070
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 40.00 107 72 129 205.0 0 41.22 3.5742.720 Trichloroethene 40.00 110 80 120 205.0 0 46.56 6.0643.820 Trichlorofluoromethane 40.00 98.7 66 146 205.0 0 46.22 15.739.490 Vinyl chloride 40.00 111 68 141 205.0 0 44.78 0.67244.480 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.00 98.6 70 156 049.290
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 50.00 96.5 73 129 048.240
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 50.00 101 73 146 050.430
Surr: Toluene-d8 50.00 95.1 80 120 047.560
Sample ID: CA200829-MB1
Batch ID: CA20VS137 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 147028
SeqNo: 3920458
MBLKSampType: TestCode: 8260SOIL503
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0ND
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.0 ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 5.0 ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 5.0 ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 5.0ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 5.01.210
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.0ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 0.960
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5.0ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 10ND
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 39 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-495
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041960 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8260SOIL5035
Sample ID: CA200829-MB1
Batch ID: CA20VS137 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 147028
SeqNo: 3920458
MBLKSampType: TestCode: 8260SOIL503
1,2-Dibromoethane 5.0ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 5.0 ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5.00.660
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 5.0ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.00.610
2,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 ND
2-Butanone 50ND
2-Chlorotoluene 5.0ND
4-Chlorotoluene 5.0 ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 5.0ND
Benzene 5.0 ND
Bromobenzene 5.0ND
Bromodichloromethane 5.0ND
Bromoform 5.0ND
Bromomethane 5.0ND
Carbon tetrachloride 5.0ND
Chlorobenzene 5.0ND
Chloroethane 5.0ND
Chloroform 5.0 ND
Chloromethane 5.0 ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0ND
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.0ND
Dibromochloromethane 5.0ND
Dibromomethane 5.0ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 5.0 ND
Ethylbenzene 5.0ND
Freon-113 5.0ND
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 40 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-496
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041960 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8260SOIL5035
Sample ID: CA200829-MB1
Batch ID: CA20VS137 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 147028
SeqNo: 3920458
MBLKSampType: TestCode: 8260SOIL503
Hexachlorobutadiene 5.01.240
Isopropylbenzene 5.0ND
m,p-Xylene 10 ND
Methylene chloride 5.0ND
MTBE 5.0ND
n-Butylbenzene 5.00.890
n-Propylbenzene 5.0ND
Naphthalene 5.00.870
o-Xylene 5.0 ND
sec-Butylbenzene 5.00.640
Styrene 5.0ND
tert-Butylbenzene 5.0 ND
Tetrachloroethene 5.0ND
Toluene 5.0 ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0ND
Trichloroethene 5.0ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 5.0ND
Vinyl chloride 5.0ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.00 99.1 70 156 49.570
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 50.00 91.0 73 12945.520
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 50.00 94.7 73 14647.350
Surr: Toluene-d8 50.00 92.6 80 120 46.310
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 41 of 41
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-497
/
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-498
ASSET Laboratories
Please review the checklist below. Any NO signifies non-compli ance. Any non-compliance will be noted and must be understood as having an impact on the quality of the data. All tests will be performed as requested regardless of any complia nce issues.
If you have any questions or further instruction, please contac t our Project Coordinator at (702) 307-2659.
Carrier name: ASSET
Cooler Received/Opened On: 8/24/2020
Rep sample Temp (Deg C): 3.8 IR Gun ID: 1
Temp Blank: Yes No
Last 4 digits of Tracking No.: NA
Cooling process: Ice Ice Pack Dry Ice Other None
Packing Material Used: None
Workorder: N041960
Sample Receipt Checklist
4. Chain of custody present? Yes No
6. Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes No
7. Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes No
8. Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes No
9. Sample containers intact? Yes No
10. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes No
11. All samples received within holding time? Yes No
Yes No NA13. Water - VOA vials have zero headspace?
14. Water - pH acceptable upon receipt?
Yes No NA
Example: pH > 12 for (CN,S); pH<2 for Metals
1. Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No Not Present
2. Custody seals intact, signed, dated on shippping container/cooler? Yes No Not Present
3. Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes No Not Present
5. Sampler's name present in COC? Yes No
12. Temperature of rep sample or Temp Blank within acceptable limit? Yes No NA Yes No NA15. Did the bottle labels indicate correct preservatives used?
16. Were there Non-Conformance issues at login?
Yes No NA
Was Client notified? Yes No NA
Comments: See Correspondence. Received at Las Vegas Lab on 8/24/20 at 2.6 oC, IR# 2.
Checklist Completed By: AD Reviewed By:
MBC 8/29/2020
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-499
Subject: Re: [ASSET#N041960] Yorke Engineering City of Burbank From: Emil Angelo Rodriguez <[email protected]> Date: 8/25/2020, 12:39 PM
To: Keith Gilbert <[email protected]>, Jackson Flanagan <jfl[email protected]>
CC: Yoandra Rodriguez <[email protected]>, AssetLabs Sample Control <[email protected]>, Thad Malit <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Good Afternoon Jackson,
I made a few typos below, the second bullet should read as follows:
We received VOAs labelled "B12-5" collected at 10:35. We will proceed with the sample collecƟon Ɵme on the COC of 10:43 unless otherwise instructed.
Thank you.
Regards,
Emil
On 8/25/2020 11:16 AM, Keith Gilbert wrote:
Let me confirm sample Ɵmes with the field technician, thanks. Use standard carbon chain.
Jackson – please provide the correct sampling Ɵmes on the samples noted below.
Thank you,
Keith F. Gilbert, PG
Senior Geologist
Ninyo & Moore
949.753.7070 (x12236)
From: Emil Angelo Rodriguez [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 11:08 AM
To : Keith Gilbert <[email protected]>
Cc: Yoandra Rodriguez <[email protected]>; AssetLabs Sample Control <[email protected]>; Thad Malit <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: [ASSET#N041960] Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Good Morning Keith,
For the above project, please note the following:
We received VOAs labelled "B10-10" collected at 09:30. We will proceed with the sample collection time on the COC of 09:33 unless otherwise instructed. ǣȏ͓ͲͶͳͻͲȐ
ͳʹ ͺȀʹͺȀʹͲʹͲǡͶǣͶʹ
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-500
We received VOAs labelled "B12-15" collected at 10:35. We will proceed with the sample collection time on the COC of 10:48 unless otherwise instructed.
Please advise on the following:
Please inform us if you have specific carbon range requirements for TPH-CC analysis. We will proceed with standard ranges unless otherwise instructed. (GRO: C6-C10, DRO: C10-C28, ORO:
C18-C36)
Thank you.
Regards,
Emil
--
Emil Angelo Rodriguez
Project Manager
C:562.881.0611 (Text)
ASSET LABORATORIES - Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism California: 11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste. B, Cerritos, CA 90703 | P: 562.219.7435 | F: 562.2 Nevada: 3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 | P: 702.307.2659 | F: 702.307.2691 This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addresse Virus-free. www.avast.com
--
Emil Angelo Rodriguez
Project Manager
C:562.881.0611 (Text)
ASSET LABORATORIES - Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism California: 11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste. B, Cerritos, CA 90703 | P: 562.219.7435 | F: 562.21 Nevada: 3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 | P: 702.307.2659 | F: 702.307.2691 This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed ǣȏ͓ͲͶͳͻͲȐ
ʹʹ ͺȀʹͺȀʹͲʹͲǡͶǣͶʹ
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-501
Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:
Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 25-Aug-20
WorkOrder: N041960
Comments:
Client ID: NINAN02
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
8/24/2020
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
N041960-001A B10-10 8/24/2020 9:33:00 AM 8/31/2020 Soil EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS WS 8/31/2020 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP WS
8/31/2020 MERCURY PREP WS
8/31/2020 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 8015B DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE
ORGANICS BY GC/FID
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 3550B
SHAKE-OUT METHOD: EXTRACTABLE
FUELS
WS
N041960-001B 8/31/2020 EPA 5035
Closed System Purge and Trap V-CA
8/31/2020 EPA 8260B VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY
GC/MS
V-CA
N041960-001C
V-CA
N041960-001D 8/31/2020 EPA 5035 Closed System Purge and Trap VS 8/31/2020 EPA 8015B GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY
GC/FID
VS
N041960-001E
VS
N041960-001F V-CA
N041960-002A B10-21 8/24/2020 9:39:00 AM 8/31/2020 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS WS 8/31/2020 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP WS
8/31/2020 MERCURY PREP WS
8/31/2020 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 8015B
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE
ORGANICS BY GC/FID
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 3550B
SHAKE-OUT METHOD: EXTRACTABLE
FUELS
WS
N041960-002B 8/31/2020 EPA 5035
Closed System Purge and Trap V-CA
1o f 6Page
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-502
Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:
Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 25-Aug-20
WorkOrder: N041960
Comments:
Client ID: NINAN02
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
8/24/2020
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
N041960-002B B10-21 8/24/2020 9:39:00 AM 8/31/2020 Soil EPA 8260B VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
V-CA
N041960-002C V-CA
N041960-002D 8/31/2020 EPA 5035 Closed System Purge and Trap VS 8/31/2020 EPA 8015B GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY
GC/FID
VS
N041960-002E
VS
N041960-002F V-CA
N041960-003A B15-5 8/24/2020 1:28:00 PM 8/31/2020 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS WS 8/31/2020 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP WS
8/31/2020 MERCURY PREP WS
8/31/2020 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 8015B
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE
ORGANICS BY GC/FID
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 3550B SHAKE-OUT METHOD: EXTRACTABLE
FUELS
WS
N041960-003B 8/31/2020 EPA 5035
Closed System Purge and Trap V-CA
8/31/2020 EPA 8260B VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY
GC/MS
V-CA
N041960-003C
V-CA
N041960-003D 8/31/2020 EPA 5035 Closed System Purge and Trap VS 8/31/2020 EPA 8015B GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY
GC/FID
VS
N041960-003E
VS
N041960-003F V-CA
N041960-004A B15-10 8/24/2020 1:32:00 PM 8/31/2020 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS WS 2o f 6Page
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-503
Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:
Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 25-Aug-20
WorkOrder: N041960
Comments:
Client ID: NINAN02
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
8/24/2020
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
N041960-004A B15-10 8/24/2020 1:32:00 PM 8/31/2020 Soil EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP WS 8/31/2020 MERCURY PREP WS
8/31/2020 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 8015B DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE
ORGANICS BY GC/FID
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 3550B SHAKE-OUT METHOD: EXTRACTABLE
FUELS
WS
N041960-004B 8/31/2020 EPA 5035 Closed System Purge and Trap V-CA 8/31/2020 EPA 8260B VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY
GC/MS
V-CA
N041960-004C
V-CA
N041960-004D 8/31/2020 EPA 5035 Closed System Purge and Trap VS 8/31/2020 EPA 8015B GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY
GC/FID
VS
N041960-004E
VS
N041960-004F V-CA
N041960-005A B12-5 8/24/2020 10:43:00 AM 8/31/2020 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS WS 8/31/2020 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP WS
8/31/2020 MERCURY PREP WS
8/31/2020 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 8015B DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE
ORGANICS BY GC/FID
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 3550B SHAKE-OUT METHOD: EXTRACTABLE
FUELS
WS
N041960-005B 8/31/2020 EPA 5035
Closed System Purge and Trap V-CA
3o f 6Page
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-504
Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:
Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 25-Aug-20
WorkOrder: N041960
Comments:
Client ID: NINAN02
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
8/24/2020
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
N041960-005B B12-5 8/24/2020 10:43:00 AM 8/31/2020 Soil EPA 8260B VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
V-CA
N041960-005C V-CA
N041960-005D 8/31/2020 EPA 5035 Closed System Purge and Trap VS 8/31/2020 EPA 8015B GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY
GC/FID
VS
N041960-005E
VS
N041960-005F V-CA
N041960-006A B12-15 8/24/2020 10:48:00 AM 8/31/2020 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS WS 8/31/2020 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP WS
8/31/2020 MERCURY PREP WS
8/31/2020 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 8015B
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE
ORGANICS BY GC/FID
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 3550B SHAKE-OUT METHOD: EXTRACTABLE
FUELS
WS
N041960-006B 8/31/2020 EPA 5035
Closed System Purge and Trap V-CA
8/31/2020 EPA 8260B VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY
GC/MS
V-CA
N041960-006C
V-CA
N041960-006D 8/31/2020 EPA 5035 Closed System Purge and Trap VS 8/31/2020 EPA 8015B GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY
GC/FID
VS
N041960-006E
VS
N041960-006F V-CA
N041960-007A B9-5 8/24/2020 2:20:00 PM 8/31/2020 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS WS 4o f 6Page
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-505
Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:
Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 25-Aug-20
WorkOrder: N041960
Comments:
Client ID: NINAN02
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
8/24/2020
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
N041960-007A B9-5 8/24/2020 2:20:00 PM 8/31/2020 Soil EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP WS 8/31/2020 MERCURY PREP WS
8/31/2020 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 8015B DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE
ORGANICS BY GC/FID
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 3550B SHAKE-OUT METHOD: EXTRACTABLE
FUELS
WS
N041960-007B 8/31/2020 EPA 5035 Closed System Purge and Trap V-CA 8/31/2020 EPA 8260B VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY
GC/MS
V-CA
N041960-007C
V-CA
N041960-007D 8/31/2020 EPA 5035 Closed System Purge and Trap VS 8/31/2020 EPA 8015B GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY
GC/FID
VS
N041960-007E
VS
N041960-007F V-CA
N041960-008A B9-15 8/24/2020 2:27:00 PM 8/31/2020 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS WS 8/31/2020 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP WS
8/31/2020 MERCURY PREP WS
8/31/2020 EPA 7471A TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR
TECHNIQUE
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 8015B DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE
ORGANICS BY GC/FID
WS
8/31/2020 EPA 3550B SHAKE-OUT METHOD: EXTRACTABLE
FUELS
WS
N041960-008B 8/31/2020 EPA 5035
Closed System Purge and Trap V-CA
5o f 6Page
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-506
Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:
Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 25-Aug-20
WorkOrder: N041960
Comments:
Client ID: NINAN02
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
8/24/2020
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
N041960-008B B9-15 8/24/2020 2:27:00 PM 8/31/2020 Soil EPA 8260B VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
V-CA
N041960-008C V-CA
N041960-008D 8/31/2020 EPA 5035 Closed System Purge and Trap VS 8/31/2020 EPA 8015B GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY
GC/FID
VS
N041960-008E
VS
N041960-008F V-CA
N041960-009A FOLDER 8/31/2020 8/31/2020 EDD ATL inhouse excel file EDD LAB 8/31/2020 Folder Folder LAB
8/31/2020 Folder Folder LAB
6o f 6Page
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-507
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
September 02, 2020
Ninyo & Moore
Keith Gilbert
Attention: Keith Gilbert
RE: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia Power P
Workorder No.: N041971FAX: (949) 753-7071
TEL: (949) 753-7070
475 Goddard, Suite 200
Irvine, California 92618
Thank you for the opportunity to service the needs of your company.
Please feel free to call me at (562) 219-7435 if I can be of further assistance to your company.
Sincerely,
Andrew Garaniel
Laboratory Director
Enclosed are the results for sample(s) received on August 25, 2020 by ASSET Laboratories. The sample(s) are tested for the parameters as indicated in the enclosed chain of custody in accordance with the applicable laboratory certifications.
The cover letter is an integral part of this analytical report. This Laboratory Report cannot be reproduced in part or in its entiret y without written permission from the client and ASSET Laboratories - California. 1o f6 2
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-508
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
02-Sep-20Date:ASSET Laboratories
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
CASE NARRATIVE
SAMPLE RECEIVING/GENERAL COMMENTS:
All sample containers were received intact with proper chain of custody documentation.
Information on sample receipt conditions includingdiscrepancies can be found in attached Sample Receipt Checklist Form.
Cooler temperature and sample preservation were verified upon receipt of samples if applicable.
Samples were analyzed within method holding time.
Analytical Comments for EPA 8260B:
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery biased high for 1,1-Dichloropropene in batch CA20VS137.
Sample results were non-detect (ND) therefore reanalysis of the samples was not necessary.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery biased highfor Tetrachloroethene and Trichloroethene in batch CA20VS138. Sample results were non-detect (ND) therefore reanalysis of the samples was not necessary.
Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) is outside recovery criteria for Benzene in QC sample N041999-001A- MSD possibly due to matrix interference. The associated Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery was acceptable.
Analytical comments for EPA 6010B:
Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) are outside recovery criteria on some analytes possibly due to matrix interference. The associated Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery was acceptable.
Analytical comments for EPA 7471A:
Matrix Spike (MS) is outside recovery criteria possibly due to matrix interference. The associated Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery was acceptable. 2o f6 2
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-509
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
02-Sep-20Date:ASSET Laboratories
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection DateMatrix Date Received Contract No:
Date Reported
N041971-001A B14-15 8/25/2020 9:01:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-001B B14-15 8/25/2020 9:01:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-001C B14-15 8/25/2020 9:01:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-001D B14-15 8/25/2020 9:01:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-001E B14-15 8/25/2020 9:01:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-001F B14-15 8/25/2020 9:01:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-002A B14-21 8/25/2020 9:06:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-002B B14-21 8/25/2020 9:06:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-002C B14-21 8/25/2020 9:06:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-002D B14-21 8/25/2020 9:06:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-002E B14-21 8/25/2020 9:06:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-002F B14-21 8/25/2020 9:06:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-003A B13-10 8/25/2020 10:19:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-003B B13-10 8/25/2020 10:19:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-003C B13-10 8/25/2020 10:19:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-003D B13-10 8/25/2020 10:19:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-003E B13-10 8/25/2020 10:19:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-003F B13-10 8/25/2020 10:19:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-004A B13-21 8/25/2020 10:24:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-004B B13-21 8/25/2020 10:24:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-004C B13-21 8/25/2020 10:24:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-004D B13-21 8/25/2020 10:24:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-004E B13-21 8/25/2020 10:24:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-004F B13-21 8/25/2020 10:24:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-005A B22-5 8/25/2020 11:46:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-005B B22-5 8/25/2020 11:46:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-005C B22-5 8/25/2020 11:46:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-005D B22-5 8/25/2020 11:46:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-005E B22-5 8/25/2020 11:46:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil 3o f6 2
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-510
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection DateMatrix Date Received Contract No:
Date Reported
N041971-005F B22-5 8/25/2020 11:46:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-006A B22-10 8/25/2020 11:49:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-006B B22-10 8/25/2020 11:49:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-006C B22-10 8/25/2020 11:49:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-006D B22-10 8/25/2020 11:49:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-006E B22-10 8/25/2020 11:49:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-006F B22-10 8/25/2020 11:49:00 AM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-007A B21-10 8/25/2020 1:53:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-007B B21-10 8/25/2020 1:53:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-007C B21-10 8/25/2020 1:53:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-007D B21-10 8/25/2020 1:53:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-007E B21-10 8/25/2020 1:53:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-007F B21-10 8/25/2020 1:53:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-008A B21-15 8/25/2020 1:57:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-008B B21-15 8/25/2020 1:57:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-008C B21-15 8/25/2020 1:57:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-008D B21-15 8/25/2020 1:57:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-008E B21-15 8/25/2020 1:57:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-008F B21-15 8/25/2020 1:57:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-009A B20-5 8/25/2020 2:47:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-009B B20-5 8/25/2020 2:47:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-009C B20-5 8/25/2020 2:47:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-009D B20-5 8/25/2020 2:47:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-009E B20-5 8/25/2020 2:47:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-009F B20-5 8/25/2020 2:47:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-010A B20-21 8/25/2020 2:55:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-010B B20-21 8/25/2020 2:55:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-010C B20-21 8/25/2020 2:55:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-010D B20-21 8/25/2020 2:55:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil N041971-010E B20-21 8/25/2020 2:55:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil 4o f6 2
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-511
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection DateMatrix Date Received Contract No:
Date Reported
N041971-010F B20-21 8/25/2020 2:55:00 PM 8/25/2020 9/2/2020Soil 5o f6 2
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-512
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B14-15
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 9:01:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-001
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM9.4 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/29/2020 10:46 PM47 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
6o f6 2
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-513
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B14-15
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 9:01:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-001
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM9.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/29/2020 10:46 PM4.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/29/2020 10:46 PM70-156 %REC 1111 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/29/2020 10:46 PM73-129 %REC 182.7 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/29/2020 10:46 PM73-146 %REC 1108 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/29/2020 10:46 PM80-120 %REC 190.3
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC3_200831B 81984QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 DRO 9/1/2020 10:59 AM10 mg/Kg 1ND
ORO 9/1/2020 10:59 AM10 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: p-Terphenyl 9/1/2020 10:59 AM56-133 %REC 166.1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
7o f6 2
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-514
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B14-15
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 9:01:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-001
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200827A Q20VS031QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/27/2020 GRO 8/27/2020 10:21 AM0.87 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/27/2020 10:21 AM47-163 %REC 1120
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 01:27 PM0.099 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 09:45 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 09:45 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 09:45 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1210
Beryllium 8/26/2020 09:45 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 09:45 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 09:45 PM1.0 mg/Kg 127
Cobalt 8/26/2020 09:45 PM1.0 mg/Kg 117
Copper 8/26/2020 09:45 PM2.0 mg/Kg 130
Lead 8/26/2020 09:45 PM1.0 mg/Kg 12.4
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 09:45 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 09:45 PM1.0 mg/Kg 121
Selenium 8/26/2020 09:45 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 09:45 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 09:45 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 09:45 PM1.0 mg/Kg 162
Zinc 8/26/2020 09:45 PM1.0 mg/Kg 161
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
8o f6 2
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-515
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B14-21
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 9:06:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-002
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM9.1 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/29/2020 11:11 PM46 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
9o f6 2
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-516
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B14-21
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 9:06:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-002
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM9.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/29/2020 11:11 PM4.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/29/2020 11:11 PM70-156 %REC 1107 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/29/2020 11:11 PM73-129 %REC 185.2 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/29/2020 11:11 PM73-146 %REC 1110 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/29/2020 11:11 PM80-120 %REC 195.8
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC3_200831B 81984QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 DRO 9/1/2020 06:13 AM9.9 mg/Kg 1ND
ORO 9/1/2020 06:13 AM9.9 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: p-Terphenyl 9/1/2020 06:13 AM56-133 %REC 164.5
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
10 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-517
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B14-21
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 9:06:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-002
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200827A Q20VS031QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/27/2020 GRO 8/27/2020 10:52 AM0.85 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/27/2020 10:52 AM47-163 %REC 1122
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200831A 81993QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/31/2020 Mercury 8/31/2020 12:00 PM0.10 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200901B 81992QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/31/2020 Antimony 9/1/2020 03:59 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 9/1/2020 03:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 9/1/2020 03:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1130
Beryllium 9/1/2020 03:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 9/1/2020 03:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 9/1/2020 03:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 117
Cobalt 9/1/2020 03:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 112
Copper 9/1/2020 03:59 PM2.0 mg/Kg 117
Lead 9/1/2020 03:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 12.5
Molybdenum 9/1/2020 03:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 9/1/2020 03:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 113
Selenium 9/1/2020 03:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 9/1/2020 03:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 9/1/2020 03:59 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 9/1/2020 03:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 145
Zinc 9/1/2020 03:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 146
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
11 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-518
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B13-10
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 10:19:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-003
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM10 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/29/2020 11:36 PM51 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
12 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-519
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B13-10
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 10:19:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-003
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200829A CA20VS137QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM10 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/29/2020 11:36 PM5.1 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/29/2020 11:36 PM70-156 %REC 1109 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/29/2020 11:36 PM73-129 %REC 187.4 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/29/2020 11:36 PM73-146 %REC 1111 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/29/2020 11:36 PM80-120 %REC 185.1
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC3_200831B 81984QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 DRO 9/1/2020 06:45 AM9.9 mg/Kg 1ND
ORO 9/1/2020 06:45 AM9.9 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: p-Terphenyl 9/1/2020 06:45 AM56-133 %REC 165.1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
13 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-520
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B13-10
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 10:19:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-003
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200827A Q20VS031QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/27/2020 GRO 8/27/2020 11:23 AM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/27/2020 11:23 AM47-163 %REC 1123
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 01:30 PM0.10 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 09:52 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 09:52 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 09:52 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1100
Beryllium 8/26/2020 09:52 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 09:52 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 09:52 PM1.0 mg/Kg 113
Cobalt 8/26/2020 09:52 PM1.0 mg/Kg 18.8
Copper 8/26/2020 09:52 PM2.0 mg/Kg 114
Lead 8/26/2020 09:52 PM1.0 mg/Kg 11.1
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 09:52 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 09:52 PM1.0 mg/Kg 19.6
Selenium 8/26/2020 09:52 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 09:52 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 09:52 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 09:52 PM1.0 mg/Kg 133
Zinc 8/26/2020 09:52 PM1.0 mg/Kg 134
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
14 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-521
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B13-21
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 10:24:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-004
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200830A CA20VS138QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/30/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM8.7 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/30/2020 02:48 PM44 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
15 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-522
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B13-21
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 10:24:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-004
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200830A CA20VS138QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/30/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM8.7 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/30/2020 02:48 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/30/2020 02:48 PM70-156 %REC 1112 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/30/2020 02:48 PM73-129 %REC 191.6 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/30/2020 02:48 PM73-146 %REC 1108 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/30/2020 02:48 PM80-120 %REC 197.0
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC3_200831B 81984QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 DRO 9/1/2020 08:20 AM10 mg/Kg 1ND
ORO 9/1/2020 08:20 AM10 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: p-Terphenyl 9/1/2020 08:20 AM56-133 %REC 161.4
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
16 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-523
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B13-21
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 10:24:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-004
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200827A Q20VS031QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/27/2020 GRO 8/27/2020 11:55 AM0.85 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/27/2020 11:55 AM47-163 %REC 1123
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200831A 81993QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/31/2020 Mercury 8/31/2020 12:10 PM0.10 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200901B 81992QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/31/2020 Antimony 9/1/2020 04:37 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 9/1/2020 04:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 9/1/2020 04:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 196
Beryllium 9/1/2020 04:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 9/1/2020 04:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 9/1/2020 04:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 117
Cobalt 9/1/2020 04:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 110
Copper 9/1/2020 04:37 PM2.0 mg/Kg 115
Lead 9/1/2020 04:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 11.8
Molybdenum 9/1/2020 04:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 9/1/2020 04:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 110
Selenium 9/1/2020 04:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 9/1/2020 04:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 9/1/2020 04:37 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 9/1/2020 04:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 143
Zinc 9/1/2020 04:37 PM1.0 mg/Kg 141
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
17 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-524
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B22-5
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 11:46:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-005
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200830A CA20VS138QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/30/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM9.9 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/30/2020 03:13 PM49 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
18 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-525
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B22-5
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 11:46:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-005
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200830A CA20VS138QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/30/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM9.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/30/2020 03:13 PM4.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/30/2020 03:13 PM70-156 %REC 1114 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/30/2020 03:13 PM73-129 %REC 188.0 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/30/2020 03:13 PM73-146 %REC 1117 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/30/2020 03:13 PM80-120 %REC 192.6
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC3_200831B 81984QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 DRO 9/1/2020 08:52 AM9.9 mg/Kg 1ND
ORO 9/1/2020 08:52 AM9.9 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: p-Terphenyl 9/1/2020 08:52 AM56-133 %REC 164.8
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
19 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-526
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B22-5
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 11:46:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-005
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200827A Q20VS031QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/27/2020 GRO 8/27/2020 12:26 PM0.94 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/27/2020 12:26 PM47-163 %REC 1125
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 01:34 PM0.099 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 09:59 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 09:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 09:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1100
Beryllium 8/26/2020 09:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 09:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 09:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 113
Cobalt 8/26/2020 09:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 19.2
Copper 8/26/2020 09:59 PM2.0 mg/Kg 114
Lead 8/26/2020 09:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 12.1
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 09:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 09:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 111
Selenium 8/26/2020 09:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 09:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 09:59 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 09:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 143
Zinc 8/26/2020 09:59 PM1.0 mg/Kg 136
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
20 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-527
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B22-10
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 11:49:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-006
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200830A CA20VS138QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/30/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM8.5 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/30/2020 03:38 PM43 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
21 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-528
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B22-10
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 11:49:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-006
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200830A CA20VS138QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/30/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM8.5 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/30/2020 03:38 PM4.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/30/2020 03:38 PM70-156 %REC 1111 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/30/2020 03:38 PM73-129 %REC 196.6 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/30/2020 03:38 PM73-146 %REC 1109 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/30/2020 03:38 PM80-120 %REC 196.3
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC3_200831B 81984QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 DRO 9/1/2020 09:24 AM10 mg/Kg 1ND
ORO 9/1/2020 09:24 AM10 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: p-Terphenyl 9/1/2020 09:24 AM56-133 %REC 161.7
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
22 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-529
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B22-10
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 11:49:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-006
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200827A Q20VS031QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/27/2020 GRO 8/27/2020 12:57 PM0.95 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/27/2020 12:57 PM47-163 %REC 1115
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 01:37 PM0.10 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 10:05 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 10:05 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 10:05 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1140
Beryllium 8/26/2020 10:05 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 10:05 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 10:05 PM1.0 mg/Kg 122
Cobalt 8/26/2020 10:05 PM1.0 mg/Kg 113
Copper 8/26/2020 10:05 PM2.0 mg/Kg 121
Lead 8/26/2020 10:05 PM1.0 mg/Kg 11.6
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 10:05 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 10:05 PM1.0 mg/Kg 115
Selenium 8/26/2020 10:05 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 10:05 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 10:05 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 10:05 PM1.0 mg/Kg 152
Zinc 8/26/2020 10:05 PM1.0 mg/Kg 146
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
23 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-530
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B21-10
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 1:53:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-007
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200830A CA20VS138QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/30/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM11 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/30/2020 04:03 PM53 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
24 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-531
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B21-10
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 1:53:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-007
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200830A CA20VS138QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/30/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM11 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/30/2020 04:03 PM5.3 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/30/2020 04:03 PM70-156 %REC 1120 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:03 PM73-129 %REC 189.3 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/30/2020 04:03 PM73-146 %REC 1102 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/30/2020 04:03 PM80-120 %REC 183.8
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC3_200831B 81984QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 DRO 9/1/2020 09:56 AM10 mg/Kg 113
ORO 9/1/2020 09:56 AM10 mg/Kg 112
Surr: p-Terphenyl 9/1/2020 09:56 AM56-133 %REC 164.8
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
25 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-532
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B21-10
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 1:53:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-007
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200827A Q20VS031QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/27/2020 GRO 8/27/2020 01:29 PM0.87 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/27/2020 01:29 PM47-163 %REC 1112
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 01:41 PM0.099 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 10:11 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 10:11 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 10:11 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1150
Beryllium 8/26/2020 10:11 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 10:11 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 10:11 PM1.0 mg/Kg 125
Cobalt 8/26/2020 10:11 PM1.0 mg/Kg 115
Copper 8/26/2020 10:11 PM2.0 mg/Kg 126
Lead 8/26/2020 10:11 PM1.0 mg/Kg 11.6
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 10:11 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 10:11 PM1.0 mg/Kg 117
Selenium 8/26/2020 10:11 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 10:11 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 10:11 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 10:11 PM1.0 mg/Kg 158
Zinc 8/26/2020 10:11 PM1.0 mg/Kg 154
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
26 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-533
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B21-15
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 1:57:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-008
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200830A CA20VS138QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/30/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM7.8 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/30/2020 04:28 PM39 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
27 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-534
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B21-15
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 1:57:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-008
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200830A CA20VS138QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/30/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM7.8 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/30/2020 04:28 PM3.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/30/2020 04:28 PM70-156 %REC 1125 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:28 PM73-129 %REC 188.3 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/30/2020 04:28 PM73-146 %REC 1112 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/30/2020 04:28 PM80-120 %REC 1101
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC3_200831B 81984QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 DRO 9/1/2020 10:28 AM10 mg/Kg 1ND
ORO 9/1/2020 10:28 AM10 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: p-Terphenyl 9/1/2020 10:28 AM56-133 %REC 167.0
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
28 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-535
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B21-15
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 1:57:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-008
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200827A Q20VS031QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/27/2020 GRO 8/27/2020 02:00 PM0.95 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/27/2020 02:00 PM47-163 %REC 1110
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 01:44 PM0.10 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 10:18 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 10:18 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 10:18 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1210
Beryllium 8/26/2020 10:18 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 10:18 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 10:18 PM1.0 mg/Kg 127
Cobalt 8/26/2020 10:18 PM1.0 mg/Kg 117
Copper 8/26/2020 10:18 PM2.0 mg/Kg 131
Lead 8/26/2020 10:18 PM1.0 mg/Kg 13.0
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 10:18 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 10:18 PM1.0 mg/Kg 121
Selenium 8/26/2020 10:18 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 10:18 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 10:18 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 10:18 PM1.0 mg/Kg 162
Zinc 8/26/2020 10:18 PM1.0 mg/Kg 161
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
29 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-536
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B20-5
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 2:47:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-009
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200830A CA20VS138QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/30/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM8.9 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/30/2020 04:52 PM44 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
30 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-537
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B20-5
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 2:47:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-009
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200830A CA20VS138QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/30/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM8.9 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/30/2020 04:52 PM4.4 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/30/2020 04:52 PM70-156 %REC 1107 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/30/2020 04:52 PM73-129 %REC 182.9 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/30/2020 04:52 PM73-146 %REC 1101 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/30/2020 04:52 PM80-120 %REC 196.8
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC3_200831B 81984QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 DRO 9/2/2020 02:28 AM10 mg/Kg 1570
ORO 9/2/2020 02:28 AM10 mg/Kg 1800
Surr: p-Terphenyl 9/2/2020 02:28 AM56-133 %REC 167.4
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
31 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-538
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B20-5
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 2:47:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-009
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200827A Q20VS031QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/27/2020 GRO 8/27/2020 02:32 PM0.94 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/27/2020 02:32 PM47-163 %REC 1114
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 01:47 PM0.099 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 10:24 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 10:24 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 10:24 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1110
Beryllium 8/26/2020 10:24 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 10:24 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 10:24 PM1.0 mg/Kg 118
Cobalt 8/26/2020 10:24 PM1.0 mg/Kg 19.1
Copper 8/26/2020 10:24 PM2.0 mg/Kg 114
Lead 8/26/2020 10:24 PM1.0 mg/Kg 12.0
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 10:24 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 10:24 PM1.0 mg/Kg 114
Selenium 8/26/2020 10:24 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 10:24 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 10:24 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 10:24 PM1.0 mg/Kg 145
Zinc 8/26/2020 10:24 PM1.0 mg/Kg 137
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
32 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-539
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B20-21
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 2:55:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-010
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200830A CA20VS138QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/30/2020 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,1-Dichloropropene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM11 μg/Kg 1ND 1,2-Dibromoethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloroethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,3-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
2,2-Dichloropropane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Butanone 8/30/2020 05:17 PM56 μg/Kg 1ND
2-Chlorotoluene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Chlorotoluene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
4-Isopropyltoluene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Benzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromobenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromodichloromethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromoform 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Bromomethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Carbon tetrachloride 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chlorobenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloroform 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Chloromethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
33 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-540
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B20-21
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 2:55:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-010
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS
EPA 8260B
Analyst: AWRunID: CA01638-MS10_200830A CA20VS138QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/30/2020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND Dibromochloromethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Dibromomethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND Ethylbenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Freon-113 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Isopropylbenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
m,p-Xylene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM11 μg/Kg 1ND
Methylene chloride 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
MTBE 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
n-Propylbenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Naphthalene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
o-Xylene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
sec-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Styrene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
tert-Butylbenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Tetrachloroethene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Toluene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND Trichloroethene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Vinyl chloride 8/30/2020 05:17 PM5.6 μg/Kg 1ND
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8/30/2020 05:17 PM70-156 %REC 1103 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8/30/2020 05:17 PM73-129 %REC 1100 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 8/30/2020 05:17 PM73-146 %REC 1104 Surr: Toluene-d8 8/30/2020 05:17 PM80-120 %REC 194.9
DIESEL & MOTOR OIL RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: PL
EPA 3550B
RunID: NV00922-GC3_200831B 81984QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/29/2020 DRO 9/1/2020 08:41 PM9.9 mg/Kg 1ND
ORO 9/1/2020 08:41 PM9.9 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: p-Terphenyl 9/1/2020 08:41 PM56-133 %REC 160.4
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
34 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-541
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 “Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism ” CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
Client Sample ID: B20-21
Collection Date: 8/25/2020 2:55:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Lab Order: N041971
DF
Lab ID: N041971-010
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 02-Sep-20
PQL
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID
EPA 8015B
Analyst: BHRunID: NV00922-GC12_200827A Q20VS031QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/27/2020 GRO 8/27/2020 03:03 PM1.2 mg/Kg 1ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 8/27/2020 03:03 PM47-163 %REC 1121
TOTAL MERCURY BY COLD VAPOR TECHNIQUE
EPA 7471A
Analyst: DJRunID: NV00922-AA2_200826A 81918QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Mercury 8/26/2020 01:51 PM0.10 mg/Kg 1ND
TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: DJ
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_200826C 81915QC Batch: PrepDate: 8/26/2020 Antimony 8/26/2020 10:31 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Arsenic 8/26/2020 10:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Barium 8/26/2020 10:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1110
Beryllium 8/26/2020 10:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Cadmium 8/26/2020 10:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Chromium 8/26/2020 10:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 115
Cobalt 8/26/2020 10:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 110
Copper 8/26/2020 10:31 PM2.0 mg/Kg 112
Lead 8/26/2020 10:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 11.9
Molybdenum 8/26/2020 10:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Nickel 8/26/2020 10:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 19.4
Selenium 8/26/2020 10:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Silver 8/26/2020 10:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Thallium 8/26/2020 10:31 PM2.0 mg/Kg 1ND
Vanadium 8/26/2020 10:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 137
Zinc 8/26/2020 10:31 PM1.0 mg/Kg 140
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out
35 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-542
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
02-Sep-20Date:ASSET Laboratories
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041971 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 6010_S
Sample ID: MB-81915
Batch ID: 81915 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 146949
SeqNo: 3916108
MBLKSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Antimony 2.0 ND
Arsenic 1.0ND
Barium 1.0 ND
Beryllium 1.0ND
Cadmium 1.0ND
Chromium 1.0ND
Cobalt 1.0ND
Copper 2.0 ND
Lead 1.0ND
Molybdenum 1.0ND
Nickel 1.0 ND
Selenium 1.0 ND
Silver 1.0ND
Thallium 2.0ND
Vanadium 1.0ND
Zinc 1.0ND
Sample ID: LCS-81915
Batch ID: 81915 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 146949
SeqNo: 3916109
LCSSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Antimony 25.00 103 80 1202.0 025.833
Arsenic 25.00 102 80 1201.0 025.580
Barium 25.00 104 80 1201.0 025.938
Beryllium 25.00 101 80 1201.0 025.211
Cadmium 25.00 99.9 80 1201.0 024.981
Chromium 25.00 102 80 1201.0 025.539
Cobalt 25.00 101 80 1201.0 025.359
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 36 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-543
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041971 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 6010_S
Sample ID: LCS-81915
Batch ID: 81915 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 146949
SeqNo: 3916109
LCSSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Copper 25.00 102 80 1202.0 025.517
Lead 25.00 103 80 1201.0 025.629
Molybdenum 25.00 99.0 80 1201.0 024.738
Nickel 25.00 102 80 1201.0 025.508
Selenium 25.00 101 80 1201.0 025.127
Silver 25.00 107 80 1201.0 026.655
Thallium 25.00 98.9 80 1202.0 024.713
Vanadium 25.00 102 80 1201.0 025.433
Zinc 25.00 107 80 1201.0 026.691
Sample ID: N041950-003A-MS
Batch ID: 81915 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 146949
SeqNo: 3916115
MSSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Antimony 24.99 66.1 75 125 S2.0 016.515
Arsenic 24.99 91.5 75 1251.0 12.8435.707
Barium 24.99 104 75 1251.0 154.1180.034
Beryllium 24.99 83.6 75 1251.0 020.881
Cadmium 24.99 85.0 75 1251.0 1.00622.240
Chromium 24.99 87.6 75 1251.0 17.8639.759
Cobalt 24.99 91.5 75 1251.0 8.27131.127
Copper 24.99 92.6 75 1252.0 22.4045.551
Lead 24.99 63.9 75 125 S1.0 68.4284.382
Molybdenum 24.99 80.7 75 1251.0 020.163
Nickel 24.99 82.9 75 1251.0 13.9534.663
Selenium 24.99 77.1 75 1251.0 019.276
Silver 24.99 70.0 75 125 S1.0 017.483
Thallium 24.99 78.4 75 1252.0 019.598
Vanadium 24.99 109 75 1251.0 36.5663.786
Zinc 24.99 34.2 75 125 S1.0 146.2154.773
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 37 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-544
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041971 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 6010_S
Sample ID: N041950-003A-MSD
Batch ID: 81915 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 146949
SeqNo: 3916116
MSDSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Antimony 25.01 68.5 75 125 20 S2.0 0 16.52 3.7117.139
Arsenic 25.01 89.1 75 125 201.0 12.84 35.71 1.6635.118
Barium 25.01 83.8 75 125 201.0 154.1 180.0 2.82175.033
Beryllium 25.01 83.6 75 125 201.0 0 20.88 0.18120.919
Cadmium 25.01 84.6 75 125 201.0 1.006 22.24 0.35822.161 Chromium 25.01 85.4 75 125 201.0 17.86 39.76 1.3439.227 Cobalt 25.01 91.6 75 125 201.0 8.271 31.13 0.19031.186
Copper 25.01 90.3 75 125 202.0 22.40 45.55 1.2544.985
Lead 25.01 59.8 75 125 20 S1.0 68.42 84.38 1.2183.371
Molybdenum 25.01 83.9 75 125 201.0 0 20.16 3.9920.984
Nickel 25.01 81.6 75 125 201.0 13.95 34.66 0.87534.361
Selenium 25.01 79.3 75 125 201.0 0 19.28 2.8019.824
Silver 25.01 70.9 75 125 20 S1.0 0 17.48 1.4117.731
Thallium 25.01 80.0 75 125 202.0 0 19.60 2.0920.013
Vanadium 25.01 101 75 125 201.0 36.56 63.79 3.0861.849
Zinc 25.01 10.8 75 125 20 S1.0 146.2 154.8 3.85148.922
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 38 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-545
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041971 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 6010_S
Sample ID: MB-81992
Batch ID: 81992 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 9/1/2020 Prep Date: 8/31/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 147090
SeqNo: 3923364
MBLKSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Antimony 2.0 ND
Arsenic 1.0ND
Barium 1.0 ND
Beryllium 1.0 ND
Cadmium 1.0ND
Chromium 1.0ND
Cobalt 1.0ND
Copper 2.0ND
Lead 1.0 ND
Molybdenum 1.0ND
Nickel 1.0ND
Selenium 1.0 ND
Silver 1.0ND
Thallium 2.0 ND
Vanadium 1.0ND
Zinc 1.0ND
Sample ID: LCS-81992
Batch ID: 81992 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 9/1/2020 Prep Date: 8/31/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 147090
SeqNo: 3923365
LCSSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Antimony 25.00 99.2 80 1202.0 024.804
Arsenic 25.00 99.3 80 1201.0 024.824
Barium 25.00 98.7 80 1201.0 024.677
Beryllium 25.00 101 80 1201.0 025.312
Cadmium 25.00 98.4 80 1201.0 024.594
Chromium 25.00 98.3 80 1201.0 024.582
Cobalt 25.00 103 80 1201.0 025.738
Copper 25.00 97.6 80 1202.0 024.407
Lead 25.00 99.0 80 1201.0 024.745
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 39 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-546
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041971 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 6010_S
Sample ID: LCS-81992
Batch ID: 81992 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 9/1/2020 Prep Date: 8/31/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 147090
SeqNo: 3923365
LCSSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Molybdenum 25.00 97.5 80 1201.0 024.382
Nickel 25.00 103 80 1201.0 025.765
Selenium 25.00 98.5 80 1201.0 024.634
Silver 25.00 98.2 80 1201.0 024.548
Thallium 25.00 100 80 1202.0 025.099
Vanadium 25.00 97.1 80 1201.0 024.280
Zinc 25.00 102 80 1201.0 025.586
Sample ID: N041971-002A-MS
Batch ID: 81992 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 9/1/2020 Prep Date: 8/31/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 147090
SeqNo: 3923377
MSSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Antimony 24.99 48.8 75 125 S2.0 012.200
Arsenic 24.99 84.1 75 1251.0 021.006
Barium 24.99 129 75 125 S1.0 126.4158.729
Beryllium 24.99 85.2 75 1251.0 021.287
Cadmium 24.99 96.7 75 1251.0 0.408724.567
Chromium 24.99 104 75 1251.0 17.2843.255
Cobalt 24.99 101 75 1251.0 12.3037.487
Copper 24.99 107 75 1252.0 16.6643.362
Lead 24.99 97.0 75 1251.0 2.53226.761
Molybdenum 24.99 91.9 75 1251.0 022.959
Nickel 24.99 102 75 1251.0 12.5538.133
Selenium 24.99 82.1 75 1251.0 020.507
Silver 24.99 72.9 75 125 S1.0 018.208
Thallium 24.99 86.7 75 1252.0 021.672
Vanadium 24.99 113 75 1251.0 44.6573.002
Zinc 24.99 111 75 1251.0 46.0573.810
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 40 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-547
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041971 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 6010_S
Sample ID: N041971-002A-MSD
Batch ID: 81992 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 9/1/2020 Prep Date: 8/31/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 147090
SeqNo: 3923378
MSDSampType: TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Antimony 24.96 48.8 75 125 20 S2.0 0 12.20 0.17012.179
Arsenic 24.96 86.6 75 125 201.0 0 21.01 2.8821.620
Barium 24.96 93.8 75 125 201.0 126.4 158.7 5.76149.841
Beryllium 24.96 87.6 75 125 201.0 0 21.29 2.7221.874
Cadmium 24.96 98.3 75 125 201.0 0.4087 24.57 1.5224.942 Chromium 24.96 102 75 125 201.0 17.28 43.25 0.89942.868 Cobalt 24.96 101 75 125 201.0 12.30 37.49 0.017537.480
Copper 24.96 105 75 125 202.0 16.66 43.36 1.0242.924
Lead 24.96 98.7 75 125 201.0 2.532 26.76 1.5427.175
Molybdenum 24.96 93.9 75 125 201.0 0 22.96 2.0423.431
Nickel 24.96 102 75 125 201.0 12.55 38.13 0.50937.940
Selenium 24.96 84.8 75 125 201.0 0 20.51 3.2121.175
Silver 24.96 75.2 75 125 201.0 0 18.21 3.0218.766
Thallium 24.96 90.5 75 125 202.0 0 21.67 4.1822.597
Vanadium 24.96 106 75 125 201.0 44.65 73.00 2.6571.096
Zinc 24.96 103 75 125 201.0 46.05 73.81 2.8971.706
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 41 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-548
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041971 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 7471_S
Sample ID: MB-81918
Batch ID: 81918 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 146926
SeqNo: 3915117
MBLKSampType: TestCode: 7471_S
Mercury 0.10ND
Sample ID: LCS-81918
Batch ID: 81918 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 146926
SeqNo: 3915118
LCSSampType: TestCode: 7471_S
Mercury 0.4167 109 80 1200.10 00.454
Sample ID: N041950-003A-MS
Batch ID: 81918 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 146926
SeqNo: 3915124
MSSampType: TestCode: 7471_S
Mercury 0.4160 128 75 125 S0.10 0.11940.654
Sample ID: N041950-003A-MSD
Batch ID: 81918 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 8/26/2020 Prep Date: 8/26/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 146926
SeqNo: 3915125
MSDSampType: TestCode: 7471_S
Mercury 0.4133 106 75 125 200.099 0.1194 0.6539 15.70.559 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 42 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-549
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041971 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 7471_S
Sample ID: MB-81993
Batch ID: 81993 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 8/31/2020 Prep Date: 8/31/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 147047
SeqNo: 3921693
MBLKSampType: TestCode: 7471_S
Mercury 0.10ND
Sample ID: LCS-81993
Batch ID: 81993 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 8/31/2020 Prep Date: 8/31/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 147047
SeqNo: 3921694
LCSSampType: TestCode: 7471_S
Mercury 0.4167 103 80 1200.10 00.428
Sample ID: N041998-007A-MS
Batch ID: 81993 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 8/31/2020 Prep Date: 8/31/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 147047
SeqNo: 3921699
MSSampType: TestCode: 7471_S
Mercury 0.4119 109 75 1250.099 00.449
Sample ID: N041998-007A-MSD
Batch ID: 81993 TestNo: EPA 7471A Analysis Date: 8/31/2020 Prep Date: 8/31/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 147047
SeqNo: 3921700
MSDSampType: TestCode: 7471_S
Mercury 0.4167 105 75 125 200.10 0 0.4489 2.770.437
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 43 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-550
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041971 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8015_S_DM H
Sample ID: MB-81984
Batch ID: 81984 TestNo: EPA 8015B Analysis Date: 9/1/2020 Prep Date: 8/29/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 147084
SeqNo: 3923031
MBLKSampType: TestCode: 8015_S_DM H
EPA 3550B
DRO 10 5.725
ORO 107.904
Surr: p-Terphenyl 80.00 64.7 56 13351.770
Sample ID: LCS-81984
Batch ID: 81984 TestNo: EPA 8015B Analysis Date: 9/1/2020 Prep Date: 8/29/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 147084
SeqNo: 3923032
LCSSampType: TestCode: 8015_S_DM H
EPA 3550B
DRO 1000 86.3 69 12310 0863.377
Surr: p-Terphenyl 80.00 60.7 56 13348.581
Sample ID: N041971-003A-MS
Batch ID: 81984 TestNo: EPA 8015B Analysis Date: 9/1/2020 Prep Date: 8/29/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 147084
SeqNo: 3923036
MSSampType: TestCode: 8015_S_DM H
EPA 3550B
DRO 990.1 88.4 46 1429.9 5.610880.965
Surr: p-Terphenyl 79.21 60.0 56 13347.527
Sample ID: N041971-003A-MSD
Batch ID: 81984 TestNo: EPA 8015B Analysis Date: 9/1/2020 Prep Date: 8/29/2020
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 147084
SeqNo: 3923037
MSDSampType: TestCode: 8015_S_DM H
EPA 3550B
DRO 990.1 78.0 46 142 209.9 5.610 881.0 12.4777.900
Surr: p-Terphenyl 79.21 56.6 56 133 044.811
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 44 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-551
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041971 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8015GAS_5035P
Sample ID: Q200827LCS
Batch ID: Q20VS031 TestNo: EPA 8015B Analysis Date: 8/27/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 146980
SeqNo: 3917551
LCSSampType: TestCode: 8015GAS_503
GRO 5.000 104 72 1361.0 05.216
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 100.0 108 47 163108.217
Sample ID: Q200827LCSD
Batch ID: Q20VS031 TestNo: EPA 8015B Analysis Date: 8/27/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS02
RunNo: 146980
SeqNo: 3917552
LCSDSampType: TestCode: 8015GAS_503
GRO 5.000 100 72 136 201.0 0 5.216 4.155.004
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 100.0 110 47 163 0109.915
Sample ID: Q200827MB
Batch ID: Q20VS031 TestNo: EPA 8015B Analysis Date: 8/27/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 146980
SeqNo: 3917553
MBLKSampType: TestCode: 8015GAS_503
GRO 1.0ND
Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 100.0 120 47 163119.554
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 45 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-552
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041971 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8260SOIL5035
Sample ID: CA200829-LCS
Batch ID: CA20VS137 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 147028
SeqNo: 3920456
LCSSampType: TestCode: 8260SOIL503
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 40.00 108 78 1275.0 043.150
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 40.00 109 75 1285.0 043.440
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 40.00 92.4 78 126 5.0 036.950 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 40.00 101 80 120 5.0 040.280
1,1-Dichloroethane 40.00 102 65 1365.0 040.990
1,1-Dichloroethene 40.00 110 66 1345.0 044.160
1,1-Dichloropropene 40.00 139 79 128 S5.0 055.560
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 40.00 96.8 80 1205.0 038.730
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 40.00 103 79 123 5.0 041.300
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 40.00 89.1 74 1215.0 035.640
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 40.00 119 79 1285.0 047.790
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 40.00 87.2 65 131 10 034.860 1,2-Dibromoethane 40.00 83.1 79 1245.0 033.240
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 109 80 120 5.0 043.500
1,2-Dichloroethane 40.00 95.3 80 1205.0 038.110
1,2-Dichloropropane 40.00 97.4 80 1205.0 038.940
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 40.00 122 76 1295.0 048.650
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 108 80 1205.0 043.310
1,3-Dichloropropane 40.00 99.7 80 120 5.0 039.890
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 103 80 1205.0 041.160
2,2-Dichloropropane 40.00 101 66 1365.0 040.500
2-Butanone 400.0 113 54 14550 0452.970
2-Chlorotoluene 40.00 111 78 124 5.0 044.290
4-Chlorotoluene 40.00 113 79 1255.0 045.190
4-Isopropyltoluene 40.00 119 75 1305.0 047.760
Benzene 40.00 116 80 1205.0 046.290
Bromobenzene 40.00 103 80 1205.0 041.180
Bromodichloromethane 40.00 102 80 127 5.0 040.900
Bromoform 40.00 92.0 67 1365.0 036.790
Bromomethane 40.00 110 45 1485.0 043.990
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 46 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-553
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041971 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8260SOIL5035
Sample ID: CA200829-LCS
Batch ID: CA20VS137 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 147028
SeqNo: 3920456
LCSSampType: TestCode: 8260SOIL503
Carbon tetrachloride 40.00 105 75 1375.0 042.040
Chlorobenzene 40.00 106 80 1205.0 042.600
Chloroethane 40.00 129 64 1455.0 051.710
Chloroform 40.00 96.6 75 1205.0 038.650
Chloromethane 40.00 98.2 58 1395.0 039.270
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 40.00 97.7 76 1205.0 039.090
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 40.00 87.5 77 1285.0 034.980
Dibromochloromethane 40.00 88.7 79 1245.0 035.490
Dibromomethane 40.00 85.0 80 120 5.0 033.980
Dichlorodifluoromethane 40.00 94.5 64 1375.0 037.790
Ethylbenzene 40.00 114 79 1205.0 045.480
Freon-113 40.00 114 58 1415.0 045.780
Hexachlorobutadiene 40.00 105 72 1265.0 041.860
Isopropylbenzene 40.00 118 62 130 5.0 047.050
m,p-Xylene 80.00 113 80 12410 090.470
Methylene chloride 40.00 110 65 1365.0 043.870
MTBE 40.00 90.9 65 1305.0 036.340
n-Butylbenzene 40.00 123 76 1335.0 049.120
n-Propylbenzene 40.00 123 76 131 5.0 049.160
Naphthalene 40.00 83.4 58 1275.0 033.380
o-Xylene 40.00 102 75 1215.0 040.950
sec-Butylbenzene 40.00 122 76 133 5.0 048.680
Styrene 40.00 109 80 1205.0 043.460
tert-Butylbenzene 40.00 111 73 1305.0 044.300
Tetrachloroethene 40.00 124 77 1245.0 049.410
Toluene 40.00 99.2 79 1205.0 039.690
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 40.00 103 72 1295.0 041.220
Trichloroethene 40.00 116 80 120 5.0 046.560
Trichlorofluoromethane 40.00 116 66 1465.0 046.220
Vinyl chloride 40.00 112 68 1415.0 044.780
Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 47 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-554
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041971 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8260SOIL5035
Sample ID: CA200829-LCS
Batch ID: CA20VS137 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 147028
SeqNo: 3920456
LCSSampType: TestCode: 8260SOIL503
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.00 102 70 15651.160
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 50.00 98.4 73 12949.180
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 50.00 98.6 73 14649.280
Surr: Toluene-d8 50.00 95.3 80 120 47.630
Sample ID: CA200829-LCSD
Batch ID: CA20VS137 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date:
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS02
RunNo: 147028
SeqNo: 3920457
LCSDSampType: TestCode: 8260SOIL503
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 40.00 104 78 127 205.0 0 43.15 3.9741.470 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 40.00 99.7 75 128 205.0 0 43.44 8.5539.880 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 40.00 103 78 126 205.0 0 36.95 10.541.060 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 40.00 97.0 80 120 205.0 0 40.28 3.7738.790 1,1-Dichloroethane 40.00 100 65 136 205.0 0 40.99 2.2740.070 1,1-Dichloroethene 40.00 105 66 134 205.0 0 44.16 4.7542.110 1,1-Dichloropropene 40.00 123 79 128 205.0 0 55.56 12.049.280 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 40.00 100 80 120 205.0 0 38.73 3.3040.030 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 40.00 105 79 123 205.0 0 41.30 2.1142.180 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 40.00 92.0 74 121 205.0 0 35.64 3.2336.810 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 40.00 118 79 128 205.0 0 47.79 1.1647.240 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 40.00 94.3 65 131 2010 0 34.86 7.8837.720 1,2-Dibromoethane 40.00 88.9 79 124 205.0 0 33.24 6.7235.550 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 108 80 120 205.0 0 43.50 1.0243.060 1,2-Dichloroethane 40.00 98.3 80 120 205.0 0 38.11 3.1539.330 1,2-Dichloropropane 40.00 94.6 80 120 205.0 0 38.94 2.8737.840 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 40.00 117 76 129 205.0 0 48.65 3.8646.810 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 104 80 120 205.0 0 43.31 3.6741.750 1,3-Dichloropropane 40.00 100 80 120 205.0 0 39.89 0.50040.090 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 40.00 106 80 120 205.0 0 41.16 3.1142.460 2,2-Dichloropropane 40.00 91.6 66 136 205.0 0 40.50 10.036.630 Qualifiers:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 48 of 62
ATTACHMENT 2
A2-555
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism
”
CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Yorke Engineering City of Burbank Magnolia P
CLIENT: Ninyo & Moore
Work Order: N041971 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8260SOIL5035
Sample ID: CA200829-LCSD
Batch ID: CA20VS137 TestNo: EPA 8260B Analysis Date: 8/29/2020 Prep Date: