1 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
Approved Minutes
Regular City Council Meeting on October 17, 2022
1. CALL TO ORDER
A duly noticed meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date via Zoom Webinar at 7:02 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
The pledge of allegiance was led by CDD Gardiner.
3. ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Beach, Brownrigg, Colson, O’Brien Keighran, Ortiz MEMBERS ABSENT: None
4. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION
a. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8
PROPERTY: 250 ANZA BOULEVARD, BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA
AGENCY NEGOTIATORS: CITY MANAGER LISA K. GOLDMAN, PARKS
AND RECREATION DIRECTOR MARGARET GLOMSTAD, CITY
ATTORNEY MICHAEL GUINA, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY SCOTT
SPANSAIL, KAREN MURPHY FROM BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN
NEGOTIATING PARTIES: CITY OF BURLINGAME: TOPGOLF USA
BURLINGAME, LLC
UNDER NEGOTIATIONS: PRICE AND TERMS OF REAL ESTATE
NEGOTIATIONS
City Attorney Guina stated that direction was given but no reportable action was taken.
b. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54957.6)
CITY DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES: SONYA M. MORRISON, CITY MANAGER LISA K. GOLDMAN, CITY ATTORNEY MICHAEL GUINA,
CHIEF OF POLICE MIKE MATTEUCCI, TIMOTHY L. DAVIS ATTORNEY,
FINANCE DIRECTOR HELEN YU-SCOTT
2 EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS: POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, POLICE
SERGEANTS ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION OF POLICE
ADMINISTRATORS, TEAMSTERS
City Attorney Guina stated that direction was given but no reportable action was taken.
5. UPCOMING EVENTS
Mayor Ortiz reviewed upcoming events in the city.
6. PRESENTATIONS
a. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES RECOGNIZING THE 2022 I VOTED
STICKER CONTEST WINNERS
City Clerk Hassel-Shearer stated that this year, the City hosted its first “I Voted” sticker contest.
She noted that there were 175 entries in the contest and thanked the Parks and Recreation Department for their assistance in promoting the contest.
City Clerk Hassel-Shearer displayed the four winning stickers that are available at the City’s two voting centers and at the Library and City Hall.
Congratulations to Owen, Charlotte, Lauren, and Jessica for their winning designs!
Mayor Ortiz thanked all the participants and congratulated the winners.
b. BEAUTIFICATION AWARDS
Beautification Commissioner Richard Kirchner discussed the passing of Dale Perkins. He noted Dale Perkins’ beautiful artwork that he painted each year for the business landscape award winners. He added that Dale was a treasure to the community and will be sorely missed.
Commissioner Kirchner recognized Green Banker at 398 Primrose Road for winning the 2022 City of Burlingame Business Landscape Award.
Commissioner Kirchner recognized Justin Ching and Vivian Ly for winning the 2022 City of Burlingame Residential Landscape Award.
Councilmember Colson stated that it would be great to find local artists to take up Dale Perkins’ mantel for depicting the Beautification winners.
Councilmember Colson stated that she would like to see a new Beautification award for multi- family residential buildings.
Vice Mayor Brownrigg thanked the Beautification Commission for rewarding property owners for making the extra effort.
3 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS, NON-AGENDA
Mary Beth Bykowsky from the California Department of Insurance discussed the affordability of homeowner’s insurance.
8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Ortiz asked the Councilmembers and the public if they wished to remove any item from the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor Brownrigg pulled item 8c.
Councilmember O’Brien Keighran made a motion to adopt items 8a, 8b, 8d, and 8e; seconded by Councilmember Colson. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
a. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR THE OCTOBER 3, 2022 STUDY SESSION
City Clerk Hassel-Shearer requested Council approve the City Council Meeting Minutes for the October 3, 2022 Study Session.
b. APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR THE OCTOBER 3, 2022 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
City Clerk Hassel-Shearer requested Council approve the City Council Meeting Minutes for the October 3, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting.
c. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AWARDING A JANITORIAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO KARLA’S JANITORIAL AND SUPPLIERS, LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,591,132, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
Vice Mayor Brownrigg asked if Burlingame’s minimum wage is ahead of the State minimum wage. City Manager Goldman replied in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Brownrigg stated that janitorial services across the country are notorious for taking advantage of their employees. He added that it was important to him that the City doesn’t unintentionally support those types of businesses.
Vice Mayor Brownrigg stated that he didn’t want the City to contract with a company that uses “gig” workers. He asked if the City requires companies to use full-time employees and provide healthcare. Assistant DPW Morimoto stated that this company hires janitors as their staff. He added that the City requires prevailing wage, which includes benefits.
Vice Mayor Brownrigg asked how the contract is audited. Mr. Morimoto stated that the contractor is required to upload their monthly wages into a State portal.
Mayor Ortiz opened the item for public comment. No one spoke.
4 Vice Mayor Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 123-2022; seconded by Councilmember O’Brien Keighran. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
d. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO CONTINUE CONDUCTING CITY
COUNCIL AND COMMISSION MEETINGS REMOTELY DUE TO HEALTH
AND SAFETY CONCERNS FOR THE PUBLIC
City Clerk Hassel-Shearer requested Council adopt Resolution Number 124-2022.
e. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION CANCELING THE FIRST CITY COUNCIL
MEETING IN JANUARY
City Clerk Hassel-Shearer requested Council adopt Resolution Number 125-2022.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (TITLE 24, PART 9, CFC) AND THE 2021 EDITION
OF THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE
b. INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT THE 2022 CALIFORNIA
BUILDING CODES WITH LOCAL AMENDMENTS
Staff requested to take both public hearing items at the same time. Therefore, the minutes for these items are combined.
CDD Gardiner stated that this is the City’s tri-annual update to the Building and Fire Code.
CDD Gardiner reviewed the notable code changes:
Code Section Change Narrative
406.2 Building
Code
Adds language to provide for manual control of the mechanical ventilation system in parking garages. The control switch is to be located in the fire command/control room and allows firefighters to have on- demand control of the system to evacuate heat and smoke inside a garage during fire tactical operations.
907.7 Fire Code Adds the requirement for fire alarm systems to be installed and certified by an Underwriters Laboratory-listed fire alarm company. This will require a greater level of training and certification for installers as well as periodic inspection of the alarm system by a UL listed inspector to ensure the system stays compliant with the listing requirements. It also guarantees that when a UL listed fire alarm system is out of service or in need of repair, a technician will be required to respond to the location
5 within 24 hours. The added installation and maintenance requirements will help to reduce false alarms as well as lessen the need for building owners to pay for required fire watch when a system is out of service 508.2 Fire Code Adds the requirement for a fire control room to all new buildings and buildings with significant renovations. It will contain main control valves, fire alarm control panel, ERRC equipment, exhaust fan controls, and other equipment. This provides a centralized location for fire personnel to control the fire protection systems throughout the building. 903.2.10.3 Fire
Code
Adds the requirement to provide extra hazard fire sprinkler density coverage in the area over electrical vehicle charging stations as well as extending 15 feet in every direction of these charging stations located in a parking garage. Statistics indicate many electric vehicle fires occur while the vehicle is being charged providing this sprinkler system density and extending it 15 feet may better help suppress an electric vehicle fire and any fire spread to vehicles nearby until firefighters arrive to extinguish.
Councilmember O’Brien Keighran asked about after-hours inspections and how long they usually take. She noted that the code amendment states that the after-hour inspections are billed at a minimum of three hours. Fire Marshall Christine Reed stated that the amount of time required depends on the type of inspection requested.
Councilmember O’Brien Keighran discussed Section 17.04.093, which discusses retroactive protection of structures. She explained that it states that a building permit is required if the project exceeds 1200 square feet. She asked if this includes ADUs. Fire Marshall Christine Reed stated that it depends on if the ADU is detached or attached.
Mayor Ortiz asked City Clerk Hassel-Shearer to read the title of the proposed ordinance regarding amending Title 17 of the Burlingame Municipal Code.
City Clerk Hassel-Shearer read the title of the proposed ordinance.
Vice Mayor Brownrigg made a motion to waive further reading and introduce the ordinance; seconded by Councilmember O’Brien Keighran. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
Mayor Ortiz asked City Clerk Hassel-Shearer to read the title of the proposed ordinance regarding amending Title 18 of the Burlingame Municipal Code.
City Clerk Hassel-Shearer read the title of the proposed ordinance.
Councilmember Beach made a motion to waive further reading and introduce the ordinance; seconded by Councilmember O’Brien Keighran. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
Mayor Ortiz opened the public hearing for comment. No one spoke.
6 Vice Mayor Brownrigg made a motion to bring back the proposed ordinance amending Title 17 of the Burlingame Municipal Code for a second reading; seconded by Councilmember Colson.
The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
Councilmember Colson made a motion to bring back the proposed ordinance amending Title 18 of the Burlingame Municipal Code for a second reading; seconded by Councilmember O’Brien Keighran. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
The Council thanked staff for their hard work on this item.
10. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME DECLARING THE PROPERTY AT 250 ANZA BOULEVARD
TO BE EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND AS PROVIDED BY THE SURPLUS LAND
ACT AND MAKING SUPPORTING FINDINGS
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BURLINGAME APPROVING A GROUND LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF
BURLINGAME AND TOPGOLF USA BURLINGAME, LLC, FOR THE
PROPERTY AT 250 ANZA BOULEVARD, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE AND TAKE ACTIONS IN FURTHERANCE OF THE GROUND LEASE (CEQA REVIEW: MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED ON MAY 11, 2020; EXEMPT UNDER CEQA
GUIDELINES 15061(B)(3))
City Attorney Guina reviewed the background of the project:
• June 2016: City issues Request for Proposals (“RFP”) for lease for recreation/entertainment facility at site
• March 2017: City Council selects Topgolf USA Burlingame (“Topgolf”) for project • June 2017: City Council approves term sheet and authorizes negotiation of ground lease • May 2018: City Council approves written exclusive negotiating agreement (“ENA”) • 2018-2020: Topgolf obtains land use entitlements. City undergoes CEQA review for project.
• May 2020: Planning Commission approves land use entitlements. No appeal/finalized • City staff and Topgolf negotiate on ground lease
City Attorney Guina displayed photographs of the project site and drawings of the three-story building.
City Attorney Guina discussed the Surplus Land Act. He explained that the Surplus Land Act does the following:
• Prioritizes development of affordable housing, open space, and schools • Unless an exemption applies, the local agency must offer surplus land to affordable housing, open space developers, or school districts.
7 He noted that under AB 1486, which modified the Surplus Land Act, the Council must declare the land as exempt surplus in order to move forward with this project. He explained that AB 1486 does have an exemption for exclusive negotiating agreements entered into prior to September 30, 2019.
City Attorney Guina discussed how the Surplus Land Act and AB 1486 relate to the Topgolf project. He explained that the Topgolf project is exempt from AB 1486 because:
• The City and Topgolf entered into their written exclusive negotiating agreement prior to September 30, 2019
• The City received confirmation from the State Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) Department in 2021 that the exemption applies to this project
To maintain the exemption, the site must be disposed of prior to December 31, 2022
City Attorney Guina discussed some of the terms of the proposed ground lease with Topgolf:
• Tenant has two years to commence construction
• Tenant has up to five years to complete construction
• Term of contract
o Initial term – 20 years
o Four extension terms for five years each for a total of an additional 20 years o Total term is up to 40 years
City Attorney Guina discussed the rent, fees, and taxes for the project:
• Rent
o Construction period: $5,000 per month. If longer than two years, increased by CPI between 3% and 5%
o Operational period (paid in monthly installments)
Years 1 through 5 - $1,500,000 per year
Years 6 through 10 - $1,650,000 per year
Years 11through 15 - $1,815,00 per year
Years 16 through 20 - $1,996,500 per year
Each extension term – annual base rent increases 10% over previous period
• Fees and Taxes
o Community Benefits: total of $500,000 in community benefits o Commercial Linkage Fee: $350,000
He noted that in addition, Topgolf will pay all applicable real-estate taxes and assessments that are levied against the site.
City Attorney Guina stated that the Planning Commission approved the design for a golf- centered entertainment use. However, he noted that given the length of the ground lease (up to 40 years), staff does anticipate change in the marketability of the entertainment venue.
Therefore, beginning in year 10 after opening, the tenant may exercise the “Change of Use” option. To do so, the tenant:
• must comply with all laws in place at the time
8 • must comply with land use approvals, CEQA review, and all then-applicable fees • prohibited uses – private members only uses, uses that allow guns, firearms, or weapons of any kind, no night clubs, no age-restrictions
He noted that as part of the “Change of Use” option, Topgolf may opt to build a new facility instead of using the existing facility. If they choose to build a new facility, they will have to go back through the building/planning process.
City Attorney Guina stated that the project site sits on a closed landfill with a clay cap that is subject to a post-closure plan and landfill permits. He explained that the project will require amendments to the plan and permits. He stated that the tenant pays for the cost of amendments.
City Attorney Guina discussed construction at the project site:
• two years to commence construction with up to five years to complete construction • payment of prevailing wage
• traffic – parties will develop a set of traffic control plans to minimize impact • easements – require temporary easements during construction period and access easements over City property to access the project site
City Attorney Guina discussed the environmental analysis for the project. He stated that the Planning Commission approved a mitigated negative declaration for the project in May 2020.
He added that there is no new information or changes to the project to warrant additional CEQA review.
City Attorney Guina stated that the second resolution before the Council authorizes signing of the ground lease and authorizes the City Manager to execute other documents necessary to implement the ground lease.
City Attorney Guina thanked staff for all their work on this matter and stated that it was a team effort.
Topgolf representative Scott Wetterling stated that he appreciated the collaboration with the City on this project.
Mayor Ortiz noted that the City had many meetings about this project.
Councilmember Colson asked if the funds from this lease would go into the General Fund. City Manager Goldman replied in the affirmative.
Councilmember Colson asked if the community benefit funds had already been slotted for use.
City Manager Goldman replied in the negative. However, she noted that these funds might be used for a project out on the Bayfront.
Councilmember Colson asked if Topgolf’s business model is continuing to see enthusiastic participation in communities. Mr. Wetterling replied in the affirmative.
9 Councilmember Colson asked if she was correct that the BHS women’s golf team would be able to use the facility to train. Mr. Wetterling stated that Topgolf has partnerships with local teams to ensure access.
Councilmember Beach stated that under the original term sheet, the project was aiming to be a LEED Silver building. She asked if this was still the case. CDD Gardiner replied in the affirmative.
Councilmember Beach stated that under the original term sheet, the tenant would be providing their own security. She asked if this was still the case. Mr. Wetterling replied in the affirmative.
Councilmember Beach stated that she wanted to see staff and Topgolf work together to ease traffic issues once Topgolf opens by utilizing Commute.org and the shuttle system for guests of the facility.
Councilmember O’Brien Keighran asked if Topgolf still plans to hire as many local people as possible. Topgolf representative Eric replied in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Brownrigg stated that everyone on Council has been looking forward to this project.
He asked about the opening date. Eric stated that that Topgolf is hoping to be open in 2024.
Mayor Ortiz opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke.
Councilmember Beach congratulated staff on all their work on this project. She noted that in 2017 she was on the record expressing concern about Topgolf building on this parcel. She acknowledged that there has been tremendous hard work to mitigate concerns and to make the best possible deal for Burlingame.
Councilmember Colson made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 126-2022; seconded by Councilmember O’Brien Keighran. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
Councilmember O’Brien Keighran made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 127-2022; seconded by Vice Mayor Brownrigg. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0.
b. CONSIDERATION OF HOUSING FUND ASSISTANCE TO A PROPOSED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AT 1875 CALIFORNIA DRIVE
CDD Gardiner stated that in 2017, the City Council adopted an ordinance establishing commercial linkage fees for new commercial development in Burlingame. He noted that these fees are collected to support and build new homes for new residents, in particular low-income residents. He added that the fees can be used for a variety of purposes including:
• Land purchase
• Construction cost
• Site rehabilitation
• Project financing related to providing workforce housing
10 CDD Gardiner noted that at the last Council meeting, it was discussed that an advisory committee is being formed to discuss the use and prioritization of housing funds. He stated that the first meeting will be in early 2023.
CDD Gardiner stated that recently, the City was approached with a request to provide funding assistance towards a proposed 69-unit affordable housing development at 1875 California Drive.
He explained that the amount of funding being requested is approximately $1,432,000, which would cover the anticipated development impact fees for the project.
CDD Gardiner stated that the developers applied for funding from the County of San Mateo Department of Housing in its “SuperNOFA” (“Notice of Funding Availability”) on July 12, 2022. He explained that the application requested a $15 million loan from the Multifamily Housing Program and a $7 million loan from the Veterans Housing and Homelessness Prevention Program. He added that funding awards are scheduled to be made in December 2022.
CDD Gardiner stated that in preliminary scoring, the project is ranking high. He added that the SuperNOFA is very competitive, and the project will have a better chance of receiving rewards if the City sets aside the requested funds.
Vice Mayor Brownrigg asked whether the project would come before the Planning Commission.
CDD Gardiner replied in the negative. He explained that because it is a 100% affordable housing project, it qualifies for ministerial review under State law.
Allied Housing Senior Project Manager Macey Leung began by reviewing Allied Housing. She explained that Allied Housing is:
• An affordable housing developer based in Fremont that specializes in the development and operation of supportive housing
• Completed nine supportive housing projects ranging from 25 to 145 units in the last 15 years
• Has 15 projects in the pipeline including three projects in San Jose, one scheduled to start construction in April 2022, and two that are securing land use approval • Has two developments in Santa Clara, one that is leasing, and one scheduled to start construction in May 2022
• Has more than 800 units in various stages of development in the Bay Area
Ms. Leung reviewed some of Allied Housing’s recent projects in the Bay Area.
Ms. Leung discussed CRP Affordable Housing and Community Development LLC (“CRP”).
She explained that CRP is a wholly owned subsidiary of Castellan Real Estate Partners LLC.
She added that Castellan has acquired 88 properties in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and California. She noted that Castellan has owned, operated, developed, and managed 2,419 units including affordable, rent-restricted, and rent-controlled.
Ms. Leung reviewed photos of the site and the proposed project:
• Five stories over three stories of podium parking
11 • Tax credit-financed project
• 69 units that are 100% affordable
• 18 units reserved for homeless veterans
• Seven studio units, 21 one-bedroom units, 21 two-bedroom units, and 20 three-bedroom units
• Serve families with incomes ranging from 20% to 50% AMI
Ms. Leung reviewed renderings of the project including landscaping and floor plans.
Ms. Leung discussed funding sources for the project including:
• Multifamily Housing Program (“MHP”) – loan
• Veterans Housing and Homelessness Prevention Program – loan • County of San Mateo AHF – loan
Ms. Leung reviewed the proposed project development schedule:
• Control of project site – October 2021
• Obtain land use approvals – July 2022
• Construction enforceable funding commitments – June 2022 • Permanent enforceable funding commitments – July 2022 • Commencement of construction – September 2023
• Construction completion – February 2025
• Program funds fully disbursed – August 2025
Councilmember O’Brien Keighran asked about the range of square footage for the different units. CRP representative Eli Wise stated that the unit size ranges from 650 square feet to 1100 square feet.
Vice Mayor Brownrigg asked if it is three stories of podium parking. Mr. Wise replied in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Brownrigg stated that the question before the Council is financing. CDD Gardiner stated that staff is looking for direction on whether the Council is interested in allocating funds towards this project. He added if the Council is interested, the item would be brought back for discussion and resolution.
Mayor Ortiz asked if the two financing options that Council was being asked to consider were a loan versus a fee waiver. CDD Gardiner replied in the affirmative.
Mayor Ortiz asked if he was correct that if it was a fee waiver, the funds would come out of the Housing Fund. CDD Gardiner replied in the affirmative.
Councilmember Colson stated that she serves on the HCDC for San Mateo County. She added that she was thrilled to see the unit mix and the units for homeless veterans. She asked if she was correct that one of the concerns expressed at the County level to award the project funds was the lack of City participation in the project. Mr. Wise replied in the affirmative.
12 Councilmember Beach stated that this is an exciting project. She asked about the interest rate proposed for the City loan. Mr. Wise replied that they would be interested in a lower interest rate. He added that the terms they suggested were to match what they expect to get from the County.
Councilmember Beach asked if they are considering changing the number of parking spaces.
Mr. Wise replied in the negative.
CDD Gardiner stated that the three levels of podium parking is deceiving as there is only one level of parking.
Mayor Ortiz asked if he was correct that the developers wanted a 55-year term on the loan. Mr.
Wise replied that it is a residual receipts loan amortizing for 55 years. He explained that it applies 3% simple every single year for 55 years. He added that residual receipts means it is paid only out of available cash flow.
Vice Mayor Brownrigg stated that this is fundamentally a grant. He asked if the City waives fees, would the City reimburse the other funds from the Housing Fund. City Manager Goldman replied in the affirmative.
Councilmember O’Brien Keighran stated that either way (loan or fee waiver) it is the same amount. However, she noted that the loan would be more beneficial. City Manager Goldman replied in the affirmative.
Councilmember Colson stated that if there is a loan, the payments would go back into the Housing Fund. Finance Director Yu-Scott replied in the affirmative.
Councilmember Colson asked what happens to the project at the end of 55 years. Mr. Wise stated that it would be redeveloped prior to 55 years, but it would remain affordable.
Mayor Ortiz opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke.
Councilmember Beach stated that she was in support of this project, and the funds could be transferred in whatever way penciled out best for the developer.
Councilmember Colson stated that she was in support of this project and would like to see more of this.
Vice Mayor Brownrigg stated that he supported the project. He added that he wanted to make sure that in a loan, the underlying affordability remains in place. Mr. Wise replied in the affirmative.
Councilmember O’Brien Keighran stated that this was a great project in order to help meet the City’s RHNA allocation.
13 Mayor Ortiz stated that this project is the right thing to do as there is a true need for affordable housing.
11. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND ACTIVITIES REPORTS AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council reviewed their committee appointments.
12. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Vice Mayor Brownrigg asked for the Peninsula Healthcare District to make a presentation about their project. The Council agreed to agendize the topic.
13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The agendas, packets, and meeting minutes for the Planning Commission, Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission, Beautification Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, and Library Board of Trustees are available online at www.burlingame.org .
14. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Ortiz adjourned the meeting at 9:08 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/
Meaghan Hassel-Shearer
City Clerk