Cities Index.
Agenda packet

California City City Council
February 28, 2023

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
February 28, 2023
Body
California City City Council
Pages
2
Original file
20.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.californiacity-ca.gov. That file is the official record.

Kelly Kulikoff
Mayor
Ronald Smith
Mayor Pro Tem
Jim Creighton
Councilmember
Karen Macedonio
Councilmember
Michael Kulikoff
Councilmember AGENDA

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY

CITY COUNCIL/ HOUSING AUTHORITY/ SUCCESSOR AGENCY

MEETING
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2023
CLOSED SESSION @ 5:00PM
REGULAR MEETING @ 6:00PM

COUNCIL CHAMBERS & VIA ZOOM
21000 HACIENDA BLVD., CALIFORNIA CITY, CA 93505
If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, contact the Deputy City Clerk at (760) 373-7140 or via email at [email protected]. We request a 24-hour notification prior to the meeting in order for the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 American Disabilities Act Title II)
Zoom instructions and notes:

1.Web Link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82466989665

2.Meeting ID: 824 6698 9665

3.Public can dial into the Zoom line:
a.One tap mobile: +16694449171,,87475859247# US
b.Dial the following number: +1 564 217 2000 US

4.Comments
a.Public must join Zoom meeting to comment
b.Keep your mic on Mute until you are requested to speak c.Use the “Raise your Hand” button to request to speak or, d.Send a chat request to City Clerk for request to speak e.When requested to speak state your name for the record f. Re-mute when your time to speak has ended
Public is urged to listen to the meeting in a quiet place, to avoid background noise. We also request public to MUTE your audio device when not commenting to avoid disruption during meeting. 1 February 28, 2023
** At this time, please take a moment to turn off your cell phones ** CLOSED SESSION @ 5:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL
Councilmembers: Kulikoff, Creighton, Macedonio, Mayor Pro Tem Smith, Mayor Kulikoff

ADOPT AGENDA

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Members of the public are welcome to address the City Council only on those items the Closed Session agenda. Each member of the public will be given (3) three minutes to speak.

CLOSED SESSION
CS 1. Conference with Labor Negotiator with the following bargaining units: Miscellaneous Unit, Fire Department Unit & Police Department Unit - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
City Negotiator: Dr. Jim Hart, Interim City Manager
CS 2. Conference with legal Counsel – Potential Exposure to Litigation (1 Case) Paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 and subdivision (a) of Section 54956.95

REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
REGULAR MEETING @ 6:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION

ROLL CALL
Councilmembers: Kulikoff, Creighton, Macedonio, Mayor Pro Tem Smith, Mayor Kulikoff

CITY CLERK REPORTS/LATE COMMINICATIONS
• Correspondence from J.M. Powers dated February 15, 2023, February 18, 2023 & February 19, 2023, February 20, 2023. J.M. Powers has requested that they be part of the official record. They will be attached to the minute meetings closest to the date he submitted.

DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
• Fire
• Human Resources
• Police
• Public Works
• Treasurer

PRESENTATION
P 1. GIS Update – Brian Glidden

CIVIC/COMMUNITY/ORGANIZATION ANNOUNCEMENTS
2 February 28, 2023

PUBLIC BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR
This portion of the meeting is reserved for the public to address the City Council on any matter not on the agenda and over which the City Council has jurisdiction. Comments are to be limited to three (3) minutes.

The City Council will receive the comments but cannot engage in back-and-forth discussion with the public or make any decision. The City Council can direct staff to bring the item back to a future agenda for discussion.

CONSENT CALENDAR

WAIVER OF FULL READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Consideration to waive full text reading of all Resolutions and Ordinances by single motion made at the start of each meeting, subject to the ability of the City Council / Agency to read the full text of selected resolutions and ordinances when the item is addressed by subsequent motion.

All items on the consent calendar are considered routine, non-controversial and will be approved by (1) one motion if no member of the council, staff, or public wishes to comment or ask questions. Public comments to be limited to (3) three minutes. Roll call vote required.

CC 1. Approve City Check Register dated 02/10/2023 through 02/23/2023 – by Finance Manager, Kenny Cooper
CC 2. Approve Proposal to enter into Agreement with CHP to utilize the California City Firing Range -by Chief Hightower, Police Department
CC 3. Title 24 Code Update – by Chief Kosick, Fire Department Adoption of Ordinance No. 24-800 for second reading
CC 4. Approve Recruitment of Additional Summer Camp Staff – by Theresa Oaks, Park & Rec.

CC 5. Approve Resolution No. 02-23-2966 or the Balsitis Project (CDBG FY 23/24 Funds) – by Theresa Oaks, Park and Recreation Supervisor
CC 6. Approve Surplus Declaration/Disposition – by Chief Hightower, Police Department CC 7. Approve Minutes for October 25, 2022 & December 13, 2022 City Council Meeting – By City Clerk, Socorro Chavez

CITY MANAGER REPORT

CONTINUED BUSINESS
CB 1. Adoption by First Reading of Ordinance No. 24-801 Amending Section 2-1.402 (Regular and Special Meetings) of Article 4 (Meetings) of Chapter 1 (City Council) of Title 2 (Administration) of the California City Municipal Code – by Dr. Jim Hart Interim City Manager
Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt by first reading, Ordinance No. 24-801 Amending Section 2-1.402 (Regular and Special Meetings) of Article 4 (Meetings) of Chapter 1 (City Council) of Title 2 (Administration) of the California City Municipal Code.

NEW BUSINESS
NB 1. Approval of Agreement for Acting City Manager and Resolution No. 02-23-2967 to Amend Citywide Salary Schedule – Victor Pronto, City Attorney Recommendation:

Council approves the agreement and adopts Resolution No. 02-23-2967 to amend the Citywide Salary Schedule to establish a pay schedule for the position of Acting City Manager 3 February 28, 2023
NB 2. New City-Wide Phone System – by Kari Lee, Public Works Recommendation:

City Council to authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Airespring.

NB 3. Security Surveillance Camera System – by Amo Meza, Chief Water Operator Recommendation:

PW staff is recommending the quoted ADT security system (attached) over the other quotes received. This recommendation is due to the quality of the equipment and the technological advantages provided. One of the advantages is the ability to be notified of a possible intrusion as well as remote view/operate the system on a mobile device. Upon detecting an intrusion, the system can notify any intruders by broadcasting a customized message as well as triggering the included red & blue strobe lights. The system will also "push" all notifications to multiple recipients (PD included). Additionally, since the equipment will be purchased up front, there will not be any monthly monitoring fees.

NB 4. Review of pending requests for general plan amendments and zoning amendments- by Paul Junker, Contract Planner
Recommendation:

Provide general direction to City staff and applicants on whether the proposed land use amendments in the interests of the community. Council comments could consider the proposed sites as a whole or could consider the merits of the individual proposals.

NB 5. ARPA Funds – by Mayor Kulikoff
Recommendation:

City Council to approve ARPA funds of $600,000 for completion of the Golf Course Clubhouse, $600,000 for a Skatepark at Central Park between Hamburger Hill and the city pool, and the remaining ARPA funds allocated for the revitalization of California City Blvd between Hacienda Blvd and the bridge.

NB 6. Consultant Impediments and the Need to Move In-House – by Mayor Kulikoff Recommendation:

Discuss and give City Manager direction as determined by City Council.

COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS, AGENDA REQUESTS, AND AB1234 REPORTS This portion of the meeting is reserved for council members to present information, announcements, and items that have come to their attention. The Brown Act precludes Council, staff or public discussion. Short staff responses are appropriate. The Council will take no formal action. A Council member may request the City Clerk to calendar an item for consideration at a future meeting or refer an item to staff.

ADJOURNMENT
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING: This agenda was posted on all official City bulletin boards and the City website at least 72 hours prior to the Council Meeting. Socorro Chavez, City Clerk 4 February 28, 2023
Late
Communications
5 February 28, 2023
6 February 28, 2023
7 February 28, 2023
8 February 28, 2023
9 February 28, 2023
10 February 28, 2023
11 February 28, 2023
12 February 28, 2023
13 February 28, 2023
14 February 28, 2023
15 February 28, 2023
16 February 28, 2023
17 February 28, 2023
18 February 28, 2023
19 February 28, 2023
January 2023 Monthly Report
Current Notable Events:

PROJECTS STATUS
Carl Moyer AQMD Engine
Replacement Grant:

Awaiting Official Notification of Award Modifying Grant Request per AQMD’s guidance and direction.

Medical Personal Protective
Equipment (FEMA)
Awarded Full Amount Requested In Order Fulfillment.

FEMA SAFER Grant
Command Vehicle Replacement
Applied July 2022
California Fire Foundation Awarded $15,000 wildland grant. In Procurement.

Kern County OES- EOC equipment Awarded In Procurement.

Kern County OES- EOC Mobile
Comm Equip.

Awarded Awaiting Fulfillment
Specialty Programs:
• Ultrasound Scans
o Jan: 0 Annual Total: 0
• Pet Chip Reader Scans
o Jan: 2 Annual Total: 2
• Sound the Alarm- Red Cross Smoke Detector Installs
o Jan: 0 Smoke Alarm Installs Annual Total: 0
• Narcan Leave Behind Program
o Annual Total: 0
Fire Prevention, Inspections, and Education:
• Regular business inspections beginning to resume slowly. • SB1205 State Mandated Inspections-Still underway.
• Plan Review, Construction Inspection, and acceptance testing requests are increasing.

Fleet Maintenance:

Departmental Reports
20 February 28, 2023
• Small vehicles are experiencing consistent mechanical issues and component failures due to age including Command Vehicle, Patrol- In Service, and Arson Unit- In Service. Code Enforcement Vehicle (still in repair-unknown ETA due to parts). The frontline engine is performing well and has no immediate needs. The two reserve Type I Engines require heavy maintenance and repair, and the Type III wildland engine (Returned to service). Small equipment is receiving regular maintenance.
2023 January Monthly Call Volume: 199
• Fires: 2
o Fires Other: 1
o Outdoor vegetation/other fire: 1
• EMS: 127
• Hazardous Condition (no fire): 12
• Service/Assist Calls: 16
• Good Intent Calls: 35
• False Alarm/Calls: 6
• Flood Assessment: 1
Jan 2023 Simultaneous Calls: 10
2022 January Monthly Call Volume: 266
• Fires: 8
o Building Fires: 4
o RV Fire: 2
o Outdoor vegetation/trash: 2
• EMS: 179
• Hazardous Conditions: 10
• Service/Assist calls: 16
• Good Intent Calls: 41
• False Alarms: 10
• Windstorm Assessment: 1
• Explosion (no fire) 1
Jan 2022 Simultaneous Calls:20
21 February 28, 2023
Code Enforcement
Location Type Location Field Date From To
All All 01/01/2023 01/31/2023
Case Activity:

Total
New Cases 18
Closed Cases 38
Open Cases at start of period 241
Open Cases at end of period 221
Violation Activity
New Violations Cited Total
ABANDONED/INOPERATIVE VEHICLES 4
ACCUM OF TRASH/RUBBISH-PRIVATE PROPERTY 2
BUILDING WITHOUT PERMIT 2
BUSINESS LICENSE VIOLATION 1
Cannabis Building, Planning, and Fire Final Approval 1
Cannabis Business Permit Required 1
Cannabis Certification from CM & BD 1
Cannabis Employee Permit 1
Cannabis facility emergency contact info. 1
Cannabis Facility stop work/ red tag 2
Cannabis Fees and Taxes - Failure to Pay 1
Cannabis odor control devices required 1
Cannabis Records/ Metrc Tagging 2
Carbon Dioxide Permit Required 1
Clandestine Drug Lab 1
Dangerous Building 1
EXCESSIVE ANIMALS 2
Exit blocked 1
EXTENSION CORDS 1
Illegal Cannabis Cultivation 1
ILLEGAL DISPOSE OF SEWER 1
Illegal Dumping 4
ILLEGAL STORAGE OF INOP VEHICLE 1
INFORMATION 2
NO BUSINESS LICENSE 1
NO POSTED BUSINESS LICENSE 1
PREMISES IDENTIFICATION 1
PUBLIC NUISANCE (Building safety) 2
22 February 28, 2023
PUBLIC NUISANCE (property maintenance) 1
Public Nuisance 415 Disturbances 1
SUBSTANDARD HOUSING 4
THEFT OF UTILITY SERVICES 1
UNLAWFUL STORAGE IN YARDS 4
Unlawful temporary property use. (Activity or business on a vacant lot) 1 UNSECURE VACANT BUILDING 1
Yard Sale Permit Issued 2
Totals 68
23 February 28, 2023

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
February 28, 2023
PREPARED BY: Serina Rodarte/HR Generalist
SUBJECT: Human Resource Departmental Report

BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION
External Recruitments – Actively recruiting for the following positions:

City Manager
Finance Director
Firefighter/Paramedic
Golf Course Shop Attendant
HR Director
Lifeguard
Lifeguard Instructor
Planning & Economic Development Director
Police Clerk/Dispatcher
Police Officer
PT General Service Worker – Golf Course
Public Works Director
Recreation Aide
Senior Building Official
WWPT- Operator in Training

Internal Recruitments –
OHV Clerk
OHV General Service Worker

Candidates in background –
Police Officer
Maintenance Worker I – OHV
Records Clerk
24 February 28, 2023

FISCAL IMPACT

COUNCIL OPTIONS

RECOMMENDATION

ATTACHMENTS
25 February 28, 2023
January 2023 Stats

•
DEC 2022 vs JAN 2023 -23%
Part 1 Crimes Dec 2022 – 22
Part 1 Crimes Jan 2023 – 17
26 29 29
22 17
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
TOTAL PART 1 CRIMES
Total Violent and Property Crimes Reported 2019 - 2023
January Part 1 Crimes - as of 2/21/2023
0 0 0 0 0
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

MURDER-JANUARY
11 11 6 11 6
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

TOTAL VIOLENT

CRIMES - JANUARY
26 15
18 11 11
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

TOTAL PROPERTY

CRIMES - JANUARY
26 February 28, 2023

JAN 2023 – PATROL STATISTICS
Total Incidents (Jan): 1537 Total Arrests (Jan): 51 Felony Arrests: 17 Misd. Arrests: 34 Total Incidents (2023): 1537 Total Arrests (2023): 51 Felony Arrests: 17 Misd. Arrests: 34 Calls for Service (Jan): 1183 Calls for Service (2023): 1183 Citations Issued (Jan): 68 Citations Issued (2023): 68
0 0 0
10 1 4 4 3 0
DEC 2022 PART 1 CRIMES BY
AREA
0 0 1 3 2 1
8 2 0
JAN 2023 PART 1 CRIMES BY
AREA
27 February 28, 2023
California City Animal Shelter
January 2023 Totals
Fact Jan-23 Jan-22
Total Animals in 32 54
Adoptions 16 32
To Rescue Centers 16 10
Canvassed 37 31
Warnings Given 33 24
Return to Owner 5 8
Euthanized 1 0
Licenses Issued 13 40
Citations Issued 0 1
DOA 2 6
Dog Bites 1 4
Farm Animal Pig 0 0
Escaped 0 0
Owner Surrendered 1 3
Calls for Shelter 61 Started logging 7/2022
Abandoned 6 0
Dumped 7 No Information
Calls PD/Shelter 48 Started logging 7/2022
28 February 28, 2023
Donation Funds Balance
FY 2018-19 $3,800.00
FY 2019-20 $2,895.84
FY 2020-21 $1,280.92
FY 2021-22 $1,977.41
FY 2022-23 $1,968.15
Total: $11,922.32**
**Updated through 2/21/23
32 16
16 37
33 5
1 13
0 2
1 0
0 1
61 6
7 48
54 32
10 31
24 8
0 40
1 6
4 0
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Total Animals in
Adoptions
To Rescue Centers
Canvassed
Warnings Given
Return to Owner
Euthanized
Licenses Issued
Citations Issued
DOA
Dog Bites
Farm Animal Pig
Escaped
Owner Surrendered
Calls for Shelter
Abandoned
Dumped
Calls PD/Shelter
California City Animal Shelter Stats
Jan-22 Jan-23
29 February 28, 2023
Public Works Monthly Council Report
January 31, 2023
Desert Clean Up Crew FY Total January Total
Total Work Orders: 310 40
Closed Work Orders: 310 40
Open Work Orders: 0 0
Dial-A-Ride FY Total January Total
Regular Fares $ 3,026.65 $ 546.55
Seniors/Disabled/Children $ 2,495.00 $ 572.00
Desert Jade $ 178.50 $ 21.00
All Grant Funds were Exhausted in May Total Fares $ 5,700.15 $ 1,139.55 Number of Riders 5,318 929
Number of Operating Days 125 19
Facilities FY Total January Total
Total Work Orders: 1259 185
Closed Work Orders: 1259 185
Open Work Orders: 0 0
Grounds FY Total January Total
Total Work Orders: 83 13
Closed Work Orders: 83 13
Open Work Orders: 0 0
Street Department FY Total January Total
Total Work Orders: 767 121
Closed Work Orders: 797 121
Open Work Orders: 0 0
Asphalt Patch(s) sq.ft.: 5,331 474
Pot Hole Repair(s) p.h.: 6,302 345
Water Department FY Total January Total
Total Work Orders: 1605 232
Closed Work Orders: 1605 232
Open Work Orders: 0 0
Meter Replacement(s): 71 0
New Meter Installments (Service): 35 0
New Main Water Line Extension (linear feet): 0 0
Main Water Line Replacement(linear feet): 13 0
Main Sewer Line (linear feet): 0 0
Water Service Line (linear feet): 125 5
Standby Callouts: 34
Citizen Complaints: 22
*Information found in this report is based on the following dates:
*Monthly* January 1, 2023 through January 31, 2023.
* Fiscal Year* July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023
30 February 28, 2023
BHT Engineering, Inc.

UPDATED: 2/17/2023

FEDERAL / STATE FUNDED PROJECTS
1 20406 3/18/2021 Hacienda Blvd Rehabilitation
5399-(030)
RSTP Hacienda Blvd from Cal-City Blvd to
Eucalyptus. Pavement rehabilitation.

City approved program supplement 02/23/2021. Environmental & Design completed. Bids opened August 11, 2022. Bid analysis completed. Awarded to Burch Construction at 9/27/22 City Council meeting. Contract docs sent to Contractor 10/03/22.

CONSTRUCTION ON HOLD: ADA curb ramps completed.

Contractor requested suspension of grinding, cement treated base, paving and striping until weather permits.
2 20407 3/18/2021 Mendiburu Rd Reconstruction.
5399-(031)
CMAQ paving of existing dirt road from
Hacienda to Neuralia.

City approved program supplement 02/23/2021. Environmental completed. Design In Progress. Invoices sent to Caltrans.

Construction plans ready, project specifications in progress, staff report for council approval of bidding phase January 17th 2023.

Project in the bidding Phase. Bid opening March 16-2023 3 21420 7/13/2021 HSIP Cycle 10 - Pedestrian
improvements On CCB from Yerba to Neuralia
3/26/21: Caltrans approved project at 100% State participation, no local match. 7/13/21: Received Task Order to prepare request for PE Phase. Caltrans approved PE funds on 08/02/21. Preliminary engineering in progress. Currently at 95% completion. Bid phase expected March 2023
4 22405 4/18/2022 TDA ARTICLE 3 Pedestrian
Improvements
Hacienda Ave sidewalk curb and gutter
between So. Loop Blvd and Manzanita Ave.

Caltrans-Kern COG selected project for $170,538 in TDA grant funds on 03/24/2022. Design in progress together with RSTP project 5 21408 5/12/2021 RSTP Application 2021 call for
projects
Prepare RSTP application for pedestrian
improvements on Hacienda Blvd from
Manzanita Ave to Redwood Blvd
RSTP Application completed sent to Kern COG 07/27/21. On 9/7/21 Kern COG sent review comments. Project selected for funding. City to issue Task Order for grant allocation request. MUST encumber funds by January 2023. Received E-76 from Caltrans) (autorization to proceed with PE)
6 21409 5/12/2021 CMAQ Application 2021 call
for projects
Prepare CMAQ application for improvements
on Redwood Blvd from median at Hacienda ES
to 98th Street. See BHT# 19410
CMAQ Application completed sent to Kern COG 07/27/21. On 11/10/2021, COG to sent CMAQ application to Caltrans for project eligibility. Project recommended for funding 2021 CMAQ Call for Projects. City to issue Task Order for Design Phase. Must encumber CONSTRUCTION funds by January 2024
7 22408 7/25/2022
CDBG # 13.21.1 Balsitis Park
Playground and basketball
court
Prepare construction plans and Specs for new
construction of playground equipment and
basketball court
Kick-off meeting 8/16/2022. Coordinating with City officials and County CDBG in progress. Plans and specs sent to CDBG for initial review on Feb 8, 2023
8 23401 1/4/2023 Hacienda Blvd Rehabilitation
5399-(033)
RSTP On Hacieneda Blvd from Manzanita Ave
to Redwood Blvd
Prepare construction plans and Specs for new Hacienad Blvd pavements rehabilitation. Received Caltrans E-76 on 02/08/2023 Authorization to Proced with Pre-liminary Engineering. Project will designed together with TDA Art 3 project
SB1 FUNDED PROJECTS
1 21421 TBD Catalpa Rehabilitation SB1 Funded project.

Catalpa Rehabilitation project submitted to the State for SB1 funding. Sent agency resolution to Sate funds to be disbursed.

Typically by mid September. Resolution completed on 05/10/2022.

Waiting for SB1 allocations typically in September 2022. Plans and specs preparation to begin in March 2023

LOCAL FUNDED PROJECTS
1 22411 TBD Indian Wells VGA Project
IWVGA (Indian Wells Valley Groundwater
Authority) Pipeline Project from Cal-City to
Ridgecrest
Began communications with Provost and Prichard Engineers for initial project planning and impacts on Cal-City's right of way. 2 19410 8/19/2019
CMAQ Redwood Blvd. Rehab.
5933-(029) - Preliminary
Engineering
500-ft East of Hacienda Blvd. to 98th Street
12/02/19: Environmental Completed. 2/01/21: Email & Phone comm with Raquel Pacheco from Kern COG. City applied for 2021 CMAQ Call for projects. See BHT #21409. Design in Progress. Kern COG Recommended Construction funds for funding 2021 CMAQ Call for Projects. Must encumber CONSTRUCTION funds by January 2024 - See BHT # 21409
3 20401 2/20/2020
Cal City Blvd at Maverick St
widening project. Construction
management only
Road widening at CCB and Maverick for Attil
Farms. BHT to provide construction
management only.

Edison poles relocated. Aggregate base in place, compaction testing report received on 6/7/2021. Currently coordinating paving and striping activities with contractor. Traffic Control plan approved on 7/15/21. Waiting for contractor to provide paving and striping schedule. Paving and striping completed on 08/03/21. Cross gutter construction and shoulder work completed. Currently waiting for road signs and recessed markers installation. Maverick St paving completed. Signs plans and installation in progress. Developer nonresponsive, ignoring communication from Citty Task Order
Executed/Received

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY
BHT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME / Limits PROJECT DESCRIPTION STATUS

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ACTIVE PROJECTS LIST

Page 1 ends

BHT Engineering, Inc.
4 21401 12/23/2020 Section 21 water mains
replacement
Prepare plans and specs for replacement and
installation of 3 miles of 12" water mains,
coordination with State Water Resources
Control Board
Construction plans and specification in progress, expected design completion 08/10/2021. Plans sent to State Water Board on 08/10/2021 for initial review. Awaiting comments from the Board.

Contacted the Board and resend plans for review. Waiting for PW to proceed. Plans and specs ready. Out to Bid Project advertisement August 19, 2022. Bids opened SEP 20. Bids awarded to Lyles utility Inc. Contract docs in progress. Contractor currently acquiring all materials, some materials are in back-order. Construction to begin until March 2023
5 22404 4/18/2022
Doolittle Ave and Jimson Ave
Water mains replacement
project
Prepare construction plans and Specs for new
construction of water main on Doolittle from
Mitchel to Mendiburu and Jimson from Yerba to
Isabella
Field work completed. Preliminary Plans sent to City water dept for review and comment. Plans completed, project combined with Section 21 water mains. Advertisement August 19, 2022. Bids opened SEP 20. Bids analysis in progress. Bids opened SEP 20. awarded to Lyles utility Inc. Contract docs completed. Construction to begin until March 2023
6 21410 6/11/2021 Keniston Water main
replacement
Prepare construction plans for replacement of
water main on Kensington CCB to Walpole
(Approximately 1,300 Feet). Staff to Complete
Field work completed. Preliminary Plans sent to City water dept for review and comment. Plans completed, project combined with Section 21 water mains. Advertisement August 19, 2022. awarded to Lyles utility Inc. Contract docs in progress. Construction to begin until March 2023
7 21411 6/11/2021 Neuralia Water main
replacement
Prepare construction plans for replacement of
water main on Neuralia from 79th to Poppy
Blvd (Approximately 1,600 Feet). Staff to
Complete
Field work completed. Plans in progress. Plans completed, project combined with Section 21 water mains. Advertisement August 19, 2022. Bids opened SEP 20. awarded to Lyles utility Inc. Contract docs in progress. Construction to begin until March 2023 8 21412 6/11/2021 Ironwood Water main
replacement
Prepare construction plans for replacement of
water main on Ironwood Neuralia to 78th
(Approximately 1,850 Feet). Staff to Complete
Field work in progress. Plans in progress. Project on hold. Waiting to identify funding source
9 21403 2/21/201 Tierra del Sol Pro Shop &
Restaurant Remodel project
Prepare construction plans for remodel/addition
of restaurant
Construction plans in progress, City change original design to a more economical building façade. Design-build project coordination with Pepper Williams. MEP plans sent to City and contractor. Project on-hold, city to identify funding source.
10 21413 6/11/2021 Cal City Blvd water main
replacement
Prepare construction plans and Specs
replacement of 10" water main on CCB from
Neuralia to Yerba (Approximately 4,200 Feet).

Formal bidding process
Preliminary project planning in progress with survey team. Currently analyzing project area recorded right of way and possible gas lines and other utilities conflicts. Project on hold. Waiting for funding source
11 21414 6/11/2021 Isabella water main
replacement
Prepare construction plans and Specs
replacement of 10" water main on Isabella from
CCB to Moss (Approximately 8,900 Feet).

Formal bidding process
Preliminary project planning in progress with survey team. Expected completion of design phase 2/28/2022. Project on hold. Waiting for funding source
12 21415 6/11/2021 Jacaranda water main
replacement
Prepare construction plans and Specs
replacement of 8" water main on Isabella from
CCB to Moss (Approximately 2,600 Feet).

Formal bidding process or staff to complete
Expected completion of design phase 3/28/2022. Project on hold.

Waiting for funding source
13 21416 6/11/2021 Poppy water main replacement
Prepare construction plans and Specs
replacement of 10" water main on Poppy from
Yerba to North Loop (Approximately 9,700
Feet). Formal bidding process
Expected completion of design phase 5/10/2022. Project on hold.

Waiting for funding source
14 21417 6/11/2021 Redwood water main
replacement
Prepare construction plans and Specs
replacement of 10" water main on Redwood
from Airway to CCB (Approximately 2.2 miles
Feet). Formal bidding process
Preliminary project planning in progress with survey team. Project on hold. Waiting for funding source
15 21418 6/11/2021 Cal-City Blvd new water main
construction
Prepare construction plans and Specs for new
construction of 12" water main on Cal-City Blvd
from Baron Blvd to Wonder Ave
(Approximately 5 miles Feet). Formal bidding
process
Preliminary project planning in progress with survey team. Additional right of way dedication and easements will be required for the new water main alignment. Expected completion of design phase 11/10/2022. Right of way issues on CCB. Wiley Hughes prepared task order for right of way and easements acquisitions from Baron Blvd to Wonder Ave. Sent to Public Works for approval. Waiting for funding source
16 22403 3/14/2022 Striping Plan at Redwood Blvd.
& 98th Street
Prepare Striping Plan for Installation of STOP
Sign and markings at the intersection of
Redwood Blvd. & 98th Street.
03/29/22 - Finalized DRAFT Striping Plan and emailed to City Manager (Anne Ambrose) for her to verify with consultant Engineer and City Attorneys if this is what they recommend.
08/06/22: Forwarded email from former City Manager (Anne) to City Manager (Doug) . 10/21/22 & 12/01/22: Forwarded email to current Interim City Manager Dr. Jim Hart - regarding approval of striping plan by City Council. Waiting City's direction
17 TBD TBD New 8 in Sewer Main Lahontan
application
Prepare application for new 8 in sewer main on
Cal-City frontage rd. from So. Loop to 88th St.
then, on Aspen to Corwin, the along Corwin to
Catalpa approx. 2,520 feet
Lahontan Sewer main construction application. Waiting City's direction
UPDATED: 2/17/2023

Page 2 ends

42140 Tenth Street West 661-940-0043
Lancaster, CA 93534 Fax: 661-949-9775
[email protected]
February 21, 2023 JN 21-6904
Attn: Kari Lee
Public Works Admin
21000 Hacienda Blvd
California City, CA 93505
RE: January Status Update
Dear Kari & Council Members,
We are still progressing in the collection and integration of water asset locations into the City’s new water GIS system. We are continuing with the QA/QC of asset data and attributes. We are focused recently on the training manual and bringing in other layers of information such as sewer manholes..

Since the last status update we have worked on the following:
 Found a few valve locations that were not on existing mapping. We plan on capturing them after the storm passes next week. These new valve locations were discovered while capturing sewer manholes.
 We have been stress testing the system and performing QA on the system reporting capabilities.
 We did not work on the user training manual much during this period, but expect to focus more on it in the next few weeks. This manual will be used for distribution to staff and use in a future training session.
 We are preparing for another Council presentation on the 28th.  We are continuing to work on developing mapping layers for the GIS web application and creating presentable layers of information. We are also working on custom GIS reports that present available attributes.

If you have any questions or need any additional information please give me a call or email.

Sincerely,
Brian D. Glidden, P.E., L.S.
33 February 28, 2023
February 17, 2023
Kari Lee
Public Works Admin
City of California City
21000 Hacienda Blvd.

California City, CA 93505
Subject: January 2023 Water and Wastewater Master Plan Updates Dear Kari:

Below is a status update on the Water and Wastewater Master Plan Updates:

1. Drafts of the completed water and wastewater master plans were submitted to the City for review on January 19, 2023.

2. A draft rate memorandum was also submitted on January 19, 2023.

3. The City will set up a meeting with the City Manager to final the master plans and rate study.

4. After the master plans and rate study are finalized, these documents will be presented to council.

Sincerely,
Brian Shoener, P.E.

Senior Engineer
210070
BGS
34 February 28, 2023
Balance on Net Balance on Percent
12/31/2022 Transactions 1/31/2023 of Total
Bank of the Sierra -- General Checking $ 4,402,682 $ (1,036,762) $ 3,365,920 15.56% Bank of the Sierra -- Cannibas Checking $ 223,744 $ 144,963 $ 368,707 1.70% Sub-Total Operating Accounts $ 4,626,426 $ (891,800) $ 3,734,627 Balance on Net Balance on Percent
12/31/2022 Transactions 1/31/2023 of Total
Local Agency Investment Fund (122) $ 10,699,707 $ 2,061,685 $ 12,761,392 59.00% Kern County Investment Fund (20202) $ 4,405,628 $ - $ 4,405,628 20.37% Multi-Bank Securities (CD Manager) $ 733,101 $ (6,809) $ 726,291 3.36% Sub-Total Investment Accounts $ 15,838,435 $ 2,054,875 $ 17,893,311 Total City Operating Funds $ 20,464,862 $ 1,163,076 $ 21,627,937 100.00% Checking & CD Accounts 12/31/2022 Net Transactions 1/31/2023 Housing Corp. -- Bank of the Sierra, Checking $ 1,670,047 $ 18,148 $ 1,688,195 87.94% Housing Corp. -- Bank of the Sierra, CD 0350 $ 71,899 $ 3 $ 71,903 3.75% Housing Corp. -- Bank of the Sierra, CD 7653 $ 30,901 $ 1 $ 30,902 1.61% Housing Corp. -- Bank of the Sierra, CD 7654 $ 20,935 $ 1 $ 20,936 1.09% Housing Corp. -- Bank of the Sierra, CD 7655 $ 45,471 $ 2 $ 45,473 2.37% Housing Corp. -- Bank of the Sierra, CD 9374 $ 62,194 $ 3 $ 62,197 3.24% Total Housing Corporation Funds $ 1,901,448 $ 18,158 $ 1,919,606 100.00% Checking & CD Investment Accounts 12/31/2022 Net Transactions 1/31/2023 SDI -- Bank of the Sierra, Checking $ 549,973 $ 871 $ 550,843 0.66% SDI -- Bank of the Sierra CD $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 0.30% SDI -- US Bank Investments *$ 81,855,636 $ 949,234 $ 82,804,870 99.04% Total SDI Agency Funds $ 82,655,609 $ 950,104 $ 83,605,713 100.00% Checking & Investment Accounts 12/31/2022 Net Transactions 1/31/2023 Successor -- Bank of the Sierra, Checking $ 545,606 $ 395,307 $ 940,913 52.19% RDA/Successor -- US Bank Investments $ 862,083 $ - $ 862,083 47.81% Total Successor Agency Funds $ 1,407,690 $ 395,307 $ 1,802,997 100.00% California City, California 93505

TREASURER'S MONTHLY REPORT OF INVESTMENT
January 2023
The values presented in this report are as of the last bank day of the month and are only a snapshot in time.

The General Funds investment portfolio consists of funds for operations, Capital Improvement Projects (CIP), water rate stabilization, administration replacements and reserves.

General Operating Accounts
General Investment Accounts
Restricted Housing Corporation Accounts
Restricted SDI Accounts
Note: Interest earned from the SDI CD is directly deposited into the SDI checking account monthly.

Restricted RDA/Successor Agency Accounts
1 of 2
35 February 28, 2023

INVESTMENT POLICY
* Contact City Treasurer for US Bank investment breakdown. 12/31/2022 1/31/2023
Beginning Market Value 82,012,681 81,855,636
Ending Market Value 81,855,636 82,804,870
Investment Results (157,045) 949,234
12/31/2022 1/31/2023
Beginning Market Value 0 0
Ending Market Value 0 0
Investment Results - -
12/31/2022 1/31/2023
Beginning Market Value 0 0
Ending Market Value 0 0
Investment Results - -
12/31/2022 1/31/2023
Beginning Market Value 0 0
Ending Market Value 0 0
Investment Results - -
12/31/2022 1/31/2023
Beginning Market Value 862,082 862,082
Ending Market Value 862,082 862,082
Investment Results - -
Total RDA/Successor Investment Assets 862,083 862,083
Total "US Bank" Investment Assets 82,717,719 83,666,953 California City, California 93505
Market Value Summary - SUCCESSOR AGENCY Proj Area TAX RESERVE

TREASURER'S MONTHLY REPORT OF INVESTMENT
January 2023
The Treasurer shall invest the City's monies as permitted in the Citie's approved investment policy and approval of both the City Manager and Finance Director. The Treasurer shall consider current and projected cash needs in making such investments.

US Bank
SDI Account
Market Value Summary - CUSTODIAN ACCOUNT
US Bank
RDA/Successor Agency Accounts
Market Value Summary - REDEVELOPEMENT AGENCY PROJ AREA TAX Market Value Summary - SUCCESSOR AGENCY Proj Area TAX INTEREST Market Value Summary - SUCCESSOR AGENCY Proj Area TAX PRINCIPAL 2 of 2
36 February 28, 2023
CC 1.
37 February 28, 2023
38 February 28, 2023
39 February 28, 2023
40 February 28, 2023
41 February 28, 2023
42 February 28, 2023
43 February 28, 2023
44 February 28, 2023
45 February 28, 2023
46 February 28, 2023
47 February 28, 2023
48 February 28, 2023
49 February 28, 2023
50 February 28, 2023
51 February 28, 2023

STAFF REPORT
City Council
Council Meeting Date: February 28, 2023
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Jesse Hightower, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Proposal to enter into agreement with the California Highway Patrol to use the California City Firing Range
BACKGROUND:

The City has been approached by the California Highway Patrol to allow their officers the ability to utilize the California City Firing Range located adjacent to the Public Works yard at 7800 Moss Ave. If approved, the agreement would take effect July 1, 2023, and the contract would be for three years, with the option of renewal at the discretion of the City. The contract would allow for the access and usage of rifle and gun ranges at the California City Police Department (CCPD) on dates that are mutually agreed upon between the California Highway Patrol (CHP) and California City Police Department (CCPD/Contractor). Upon approval for the proposal, the contract would include, but not limited to, and with the agreement of the CHP:
• CHP will reimburse CCPD for repair costs of all damaged property when loss or damages result from negligent acts or omissions of the State or its officer(s), employees, or agents. • CHP will not modify or repair the CCPD Firing Range without providing written request to the CCPD Chief for approval. Upon written approval, repairs or modifications will be agreed upon by both CCPD and CHP.
• CHP will provide all staff, cadets, instructors, CHP Rangemasters and observers with eye and ear protection. This protection shall be worn at all times when firearms are being discharged.
• CHP shall have at least one (1) Rangemaster per five (5) shooters on the Firing Range while being utilized by CHP staff. (e.g., 10 shooters require at least two (2) Rangemasters.)
• CHP will provide all ammunition, targets, target stands, frames, props, timers, tables, scoreboards, chronographs, and any other item needed to conduct CHP training. • CHP will provide all communication equipment necessary for communication with fire, ambulance, or other rescue services. CHP will develop and have present at all times during the CCPD Firing Range use, an Emergency Operations Plan containing phone numbers of Fire Departments, Ambulance, Hospitals, and the routes to the nearest hospitals, etc. A copy of this document shall be provided by CCPD. • CHP will assume responsibility for any and all fires started by State personnel. • CHP will abide by the CCPD Police Officer Standards Training Guidelines.

CC 2.
52 February 28, 2023
• Use of the ranges(s) by CHP will be limited to those individuals who are supervised by a certified Rangemaster or a certified Assistant Rangemaster of the State. • CHP is prohibited from subleasing all or any part of the CCPD Firing Range.

FISCAL IMPACT:
$3,600 of unanticipated revenue annually, for a total of $10,800 after three years.

RECOMMENDATION:

Council authorizes the Chief of Police to enter contract negotiations with the California Highway Patrol for use of the CCPD Firing Range at a monthly rate of $300, and or $3,600 annually.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None.

PREPARED BY:

Jesse Hightower, Chief of Police
53 February 28, 2023

CITY COUNCIL
DATE:

TO:

FROM:

February 28, 2022 Mayor
and City Council Jeremy
Kosick, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: Title 24 Code updates
_____________________________________________________________________________________ The Fire Department and Building Department is requesting to update the fire and building codes to the current 2022 publication.

BACKGROUND:

Every three years Title 24 is updated throughout the State of California for all Fire and Building Codes. Updating to the latest code iteration is customary and has been standard practice for the City of California City. Updating to the latest code iteration ensures compliance with new industry safety standards and required mandates for the State of California.

RECOMMENDATION:

The City Council adopts the 2022 version of Title 24 (All 12 Parts) including all appendices and NFPA standards to be known as the Fire Code and the Building and Safety Code per municipal code sections Sec. 4-1.101 and Sec. 8-1.01 respectively.

FISCAL IMPACT:

An estimated cost of $4,649.37 for three physical copies of each code as required by the municipalde (Sec. 4-1.102 and Sec. 8-1.102) and PDF Download versions split between the fire department, the general fund, and the building department.

Fire GL# 19-4222-210-$1,549.79
Building GL# 10-4168-210-$1,549.79
General Fund GL# 10-4155-210-$1,549.79
CC 3.
54 February 28, 2023
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

Helps to ensure compliance with current state laws and codes.

Attachments:

Ordaniance No. 24-800
55 February 28, 2023
ORDINANCE NO. 24-800

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2022 EDITION OF THE TITLE 24 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS OF REGULATIONS AND FIRE CODE (ALL 12 PARTS)

WITHOUT AMENDMENTS, AND ALL NFPA STANDARDS WHICH WILL COMPRISE

THE BUILDING AND SAFETY CODE OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, AND THE FIRE CODE OF CALIFORNIA CITY.

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY SECTION 1: The City of California City hereby adopts the 2022 California Code of Regulations Title 24 all 12 parts, all appendices, and NFPA standards, without amendments as the City of California City Building and Safety Code 2022, and California City Fire Code 2022.

SECTION 2: References to Prior Code: Upon the effective date, the 2022 City of California City Building and Safety Code, and California City Fire Code, will supersede and expressly repeal any and all previous city building codes.

SECTION 3: Effective Date: The 2022 City of California City Building and Safety Code, and California City Fire Code will be in force and effective on January 1, 2023.

SECTION 4: if any chapter, article, section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, or the application thereof to any person, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or its application to other persons. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more of them would be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5: Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within City of California City, pursuant to all legal requirements.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ______, 2023.

Kelly Kulikoff, Mayor
56 February 28, 2023
I, Socorro Chavez, City Clerk of the City of California City, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of California City held on the 14 day of February, 2023, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of California on the ____ day of _________,__, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES: ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST:

Socorro Chavez , City Clerk
57 February 28, 2023
City Council
February 28, 2023
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: THERESA OAKS, PARKS AND RECREATION
SUBJECT: Additional Summer Camp Staff
BACKGROUND:

Last year parks had an extremely successful summer camp, with over 40 kids enrolled and attending and more on the waiting list.

Last year Staff was approved to hire an additional 2 part time/ temporary staff to cover the needs for summer camp. Due to the number of kids that were on the waitlist last year, staff would like to add 1 more part time/ temporary person. Summer camp lasts from June 19th to August 4th, and is Monday – Friday from 9-4. Staff also utilizes volunteers to help run the camp.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the hiring of 1 additional temporary part time person for summer camp.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Fiscal impact will be $1,920.00 out of 10-4561-120 for Fiscal year 22/23 CC 4.
58 February 28, 2023

CITY COUNCIL
February 28, 2023
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Theresa Oaks Recreation Supervisor
SUBJECT: City Council's Resolution approving the Balsitis Project for the City's Annual Action Plan (CDBG FY 23/24 Funds).

BACKGROUND: In order to comply with the requirements of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds application; a public hearing was held on February 14, 2023, to receive input, ideas, and help from the community to identify eligible and qualifying projects for the use of the Fiscal Year 2023/24 CDBG funds (approximately $72,607). The Council voted to apply the funds for the currently underfunded Balsitis playground project.

RECOMMENDATION: The City Council adopt "RESOLUTION NO. 02-23-2966 OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY TO ESTABLISH A NEW PROJECT ENTITLED ‘BALSITIS PARK RECREATIONAL PLAYGROUND PROJECT’ AND SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR $72,607 IN KERN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024." ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION: N/A
CC 5.
59 February 28, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. 02-23-2966

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY TO ESTABLISH A NEW PROJECT ENTITLED "BALSITIS PARK REREAITONAL PLAYGROUND” AND SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR $72,607 IN KERN COUNTY

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA as follows:

Section 1. Purpose
A public hearing was held on February 14, 2023, to consider the City's proposed use of CDBG Funds for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024.

The purpose of this resolution is to fund the project entitled "Balsitis Park Recreational Playground" and authorize
the submission of the application package for $72,6071 in CDBG Funds for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 28th day of February 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Kelly Kulikoff Mayor
ATTEST:

Socorro Chavez, City Clerk
60 February 28, 2023

STAFF REPORT
City Council
Council Meeting Date: February 28, 2023
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Jesse Hightower, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Surplus Declaration/Disposition
BACKGROUND:

Several years ago, the California City Police Department obtained various items from the DRMO program. These items have been sitting, and for most items, rotting away in a storage container and deemed not usable. The usable items have been retained and are currently being used. A DRMO spokesperson was contacted, and they advised us that if the items listed had fallen off the roster, we could use, disperse, or destroy as we see fit. Pursuant to CCPD Policy 706, Military Equipment, these items have not been on our inventory in years. These items are:
(16) aviator headsets (inoperable)
(4) propane stoves
Leather restraints
Fire extinguishers (expired)
(25) head lamps (inoperable)
Filing cabinet
Table
(4) desks
Miscellaneous boots (does not meet our criteria)
Miscellaneous ruck sacks
Boot liners
Tactical thigh rigs (does not meet our criteria)
Ponchos (damaged)
First aid kits (expired)
Miscellaneous cables/cords
Overhead amber lights (outdated)
(2) water buffalos (potential auction)
Treadmill (broken)
Various generators (missing parts and do not run)
FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

CC 6.
61 February 28, 2023
ATTACHMENT(S):

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Council approves the classification of the listed DRMO equipment as surplus and allow CCPD to disperse and or destroy accordingly.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None.

PREPARED BY:

Jesse Hightower, Chief of Police
62 February 28, 2023

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY

CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY OCTOBER 25, 2022

MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING @ 6:00 PM
21000 Hacienda Blvd., California City, CA 93505

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor O’Laughlin called the meeting to order at 6:00pm.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
Pledge of allegiance by: Council member Kulikoff
Invocation by: Pastor Ron Smith

ROLL CALL
City Clerk Chavez called roll:

Present: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff, Councilmember Macedonio, Mayor Pro Tem Lessenevitch, Mayor O’Laughlin

Absent: None

ADOPT AGENDA
Motion by: Councilmember Creighton 2nd by: Councilmember Kulikoff VOTE: 5 Yes 0 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion Carried

CITY CLERK REPORTS/LATE COMMUNICATIONS
• Correspondence from J.M. Powers dated October 1, 2022, October 2, 2022, October 14, 2022, and October 15, 2022. We received correspondence from J.M. Powers he requested they be part of the official record. They will be attached to the minute meetings closest to the date he submitted. • Correspondence received from DJ Twohig, regarding Fast Track.

DEPARTMENT REPORTS
• Building
• Fire
• Human Resources
• Park and Recreation
• Planning
• Police - Mayor O’Laughlin – Questioned about police reports and crimes statistics not being reported. Response from Jesse Hightower, currently working on getting it updated on the website on weekly basis.
• Public Works
• Treasurer
Public Comments:
• DJ Twohig – Spoke
CC 7.
63 February 28, 2023

CITY MANAGER REPORT
CMR 1. Consent - Appointment of Jesse Hightower as Chief of Police • Presented Chief of Police for City, Jesse Hightower
Councilmember questions:
• Councilmember Macedonio – Have we determined which is the job description, since there more than one. Response from City Manager Dr. Jim Hart, we have three Job Descriptions done on 2002, January 2021, July 2022. The Job Description that will be used for Jesse Hightower is the one done in July 2022. Councilmember Macedonio questioned if job description was approved by Council. How does the Chief get sworn in.

Public Comments:
• Al Hudson – Spoke
• Samantha – Spoke Via Zoom
• Miguel – Spoke
Motion to Approve CMR1. Motion By: Councilmember Kulikoff 2nd by: Councilmember Creighton AYES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff, Councilmember Macedonio, Mayor O’Laughlin NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Pro Tem Lessenevitch
VOTE: 4 Yes 0 Nays 1 Abstain 0 Absent Motion Carried

PRESENTATION
Introduction of New Police Chief
• Celebration/sworn was done for Chief Jesse Hightower, by City Clerk Socorro Chavez CMR 2. Oral report regarding TDA
• City Manager Dr. Jim Hart, spoke about the fund balance. Reserve funds are not being used to cover inexpensive. Due to the lack of City audits, we are unable to file claims for TDA. Currently city has approximately 3.9 million dollars in reimbursements that are due once audits are caught up and TDA reports are put together for street activities. Our audits for 19-20 will be done by January.

Councilmember Comments:
• Councilmember Creighton – Mentioned that dial-a-ride needs to be paid off first, learned that from Kern Kog.At the end of every fiscal year when audit is submitted, there is a certain number of funds that’s estimated, it’s for transportation.
• Councilmember Macedonio – Questioned what is making Dial-a -Ride hold. Per Councilmember Creighton past few years have not been doing any audits, dial-a-ride has been operating on the city, it should be on an enterprise and needs to be self-supportive.

Public Comments:
• Tenant from Desert Jade – Spoke

CIVIC/COMMUNITY/ORGANIZATION ANNOUNCEMENTS
• Al Hudson – Residence of Desert Jade, cannot be sold according to City Ordinance under Section 3-2-404
64 February 28, 2023
• Samantha – help community with more resources, free tutoring for kids, anti-bullying, community building, food distribution for the homeless. Currently looking for people to partner up and sponsor a building for us. Accessible 24/7. Drive on December 10th would like the community to join.

Telephone number (323)849-7476. We provide housing referrals, shelter referrals, drug rehabilitation. Facebook website is Fb.me/momiesofmojavecalcitychapter.

PUBLIC BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR
This portion of the meeting is reserved for the public to address the City Council on any matter not on the agenda and over which the City Council has jurisdiction. Comments are to be limited to three (3) minutes.

The City Council will receive the comments but cannot engage in back-and-forth discussion with the public or make any decision. The City Council can direct staff to bring the item back to a future agenda for discussion.
• Mrs. Schiller – Spoke about 23 year old daughter Debry Schiller who was murdered in California City Central Park on June 26, 2016, and other cases. Requested for a plaque to be install in city hall.
• Mayor O’Laughlin – Need to agendize to make vote, asked City Manager Dr. Hart to put on agenda for next meeting.
• Duane Vazquez – Asked for update on American rescue plan act. • Shawn B – Questioned about City Insurance
• DJ Twohig – Spoke about Economic Policy Suggestions provided handout, Per Councilmember Macedonio is handout visible for public.
• Al Hudson – Spoke of California retirees Calpers pensions. • Wendy – Questioned about American rescue plan, what is the amount of taxes received from cannabis, Status on the issued of reduction from cannabis. • Jada – Spoke about Desert Jade Status and lack operation dog park • Ron Smith - Spoke of RFP
• Interested about Filming studio/Entertainment to Calcity.

CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the consent calendar are considered routine, non-controversial and will be approved by (1) one motion if no member of the council, staff, or public wishes to comment or ask questions. Public comments to be limited to (3) three minutes. Roll call vote required.

CC 1. Approve City Check Register dated 10/07/2022 through 10/20/2022 – by Finance Manager Kenneth Cooper
• Councilmember Macedonio – Requested to come back with a list of all legal cases, grants, status of retail services, and do we have a notary on city staff.

CC 2. Adoption of Resolution No. 10-22-2954, a Resolution of the City Council Ratifying the Proclamation of State of Emergency by Governor Newsom on March 4, 2020, and Making the Legally Required Findings to Continue to Authorize the Conduct of Remote “Telephonic” Meetings During the State of Emergency for the Period from October 25, 2022, through November 24, 2022 – by Interim City Manager Dr. Jim Hart CC 3. Approve Indemnification agreement to receive mutual-aid equipment for the Fire Department - by Fire Chief Jeremy Kosick
CC 4. Approve Purchase of Five (5) Conex Containers – by Public Works Chief Water Operator Amador Meza
65 February 28, 2023
• Councilmember Creighton asked for an Update. There is an increase in small amount of money.

CC 5. Approve Authorization for new position and recruitment – by Park and Recreation Supervisor Theresa Oaks - Mayor O’Laughlin asked to pull CC5 for Discussion CC 6. Approve Cold Mix Purchase and Emulsion Truck Rental – by OHV Manager Inge Elmes CC 7. Approve Contract with Farmworkers Institute of Education & Leadership Development (F.I.E.L.D.) – by OHV Manager Inge Elmes
CC 8. Approve Design and Production of 5th Edition OHV Rider Maps – by OHV Manager Inge Elmes Public Comments:
• Al Hudson – Spoke
• Duane Vazquez – Spoke
Motion to Approve CC1, CC3, CC4, CC6, CC7 and CC8: Motion by: Councilmember Kulikoff 2nd by:

Councilmember Macedonio
AYES: Councilmember Kulikoff, Councilmember Macedonio, Mayor Pro Tem Lessenevitch, Mayor O’Laughlin
NOES: Councilmember Creighton
VOTE: 4 Yes 1 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion Carried
Motion to Approve CC2: Motion by: Councilmember Creighton 2nd by: Councilmember Macedoinio AYES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Macedonio, Mayor O’Laughlin NOES: Councilmember Kulikoff, Mayor Pro Tem Lessenevitch, VOTE: 3 Yes 2 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion Carried
Discussion on CC5:
• Mayor O’Laughlin – Questioned if it’s better to have that person report to our maintenance supervisor, rather than recreation supervisor.
• Theresa Oaks – Preferred that there are four parks
• Councilmember Creighton – Questioned about salary being low on full time position, per Theresa it will be approximately 49-51 thousand. Is this job description standardized for all maintenance worker I.
• Councilmember Macedonio – Questioned if all position on chart currently filled. In MWI what Career path to improve skills that will continue training, how do they learn how to do more and become more valuable. Who does the Training.

Public Comments:
• Duane Vazquez - Spoke
Motion to Approve with increased number of rate: Motion by: Councilmember Creighton 2nd by:

Councilmember Kulikoff
AYES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff, Councilmember Macedonio,Mayor Pro Tem Lessenevitch, Mayor O’Laughlin
NOES: None
VOTE: 5 Yes 0 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion Carried
66 February 28, 2023

CONTINUED BUSINESS
CB 1. Water Standby Charge-Intention to Levy - by Interim City Manager, Dr. Jim Hart Recommendation: Adopt “Resolution No. 10-22-2953 Of the City Council of the City of California City initiating proceedings for the establishment of the Water Standby charges for fiscal year 2022-23” • City Manager Dr. Jim Hart requested for CB1 to be taken off agenda.

CB 2. Revised Fast Track Resolution from City Council direction at the October 11, 2022, City Council Meeting - by Interim City Manager, Dr. Jim Hart Recommendation: The City Council approve the Resolution adopting a Fast Track process to improve processing and tracking of applications submitted to the planning and building departments. • City Manager Dr. Jim Hart, Fast track resolution presented on last council meeting, City Council concerned with connection administrative response building and policy. This Resolution establishes the policy of fast track. Staff will bring back the administrative procedures if council adopts this resolution.
• Councilmember Creighton – Question page 2 on resolution on building official, asked for an example of documents waived by building official. Concerned about waiving, because then all will want to waive.
• Attorney mentioned that needs time to review to revised it. • City Attorney Victor Ponto - Suggested to insert “Upon approval of the Building Official and concurrence of approval by the city manager.”
Public Comments:
• DJ Twohig – Spoke
• Ronald Smith – Spoke
• Robert Dacey Jr. -Spoke
• Mussa – Spoke
• Al Hudson – Spoke
Councilmember Comments:
• Councilmember Macedonio: Mentioned that she had asked Attorney Karen Briggs for the grand jury report.

Motion to Approve Resolution 10-22-2955 with revisions: Motion by: Councilmember Kulikoff 2nd by:

Councilmember Creighton
AYES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff, Councilmember Macedonio Mayor O’Laughlin NOES: Mayor Pro Tem Lessenevitch
VOTE: 4 Yes 1 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion Carried
Motion to bring back the fast track resolution 10-22-2952/ and to kill 10-22-2955: Motion by:

Councilmember Kulikoff 2nd by: Pro Tem Lessenevitch
AYES: Councilmember Kulikoff, Mayor Pro Tem Lessenevitch, NOES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Macedonio, Mayor O’Laughlin VOTE: 2 Yes 3 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion Carried
2nd call Public Comments:

Al Hudson – Spoke
67 February 28, 2023
DJ Twohig - Spoke

NEW BUSINESS
NB 1. November and December City Council Meeting Schedule and Holiday Closings - by Interim City Manager, Dr. Jim Hart
Recommendation:

1.Staff recommends that the City Council determine how it would like to proceed with the second meeting in November.

2. Staff recommends that the City Council close City Hall on December 28th and hold a special meeting earlier in the month, if needed
• City Manager Dr. Jim Hart read NB1 report.

Councilmember Questions:
• Councilmember Macedoino – Asked for city manager to explain the closing. Need to have both meetings on December.
• Mayor O’Laughlin – Mentioned that schedule calendar didn’t seem right. Questioned on who did schedule. December needs to be brought back.
• Councilmember Kulikoff – not changing schedule.

Public Comment:
• DJ Twohig – Spoke
Motion to have regular meetings on November 8th and 22nd: Motion by: Councilmember Macedonio 2nd by: Councilmember Kulikoff
AYES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff, Councilmember Macedonio,Mayor Pro Tem Lessenevitch, Mayor O’Laughlin
NOES: None
VOTE: 5 Yes 0 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion Carried
NB 2. Approval of Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Kern COG for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations by –by Interim City Manager, Dr. Jim Hart Recommendation: That the City Council approve the MOU with the Kern COG and authorize the City Manager to execute the MOU.
• City Manager Dr. Jim Hart read NB2 report.

Councilmember questions:
• Councilmember Macedonio – Questioned
NB 3. Approve Resolution No. 10-22-2956 Adopting a Preliminary Budget for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 – by Interim City Manager, Dr. Jim Hart
Recommendation: Staff recommends that Council adopt the approved City Budget for FY 21-22 as the preliminary City Budget for FY 2022-2023.
• City Manager Dr. Hart – Mentioned that is working on a budget that will hopefully be presented to the city council by before the end of November, which then it will substitute for this continuation of the formal fiscal year budget. Asking council to authorize to continue making expenditures so we get the budget before the end of November.
68 February 28, 2023
• Councilmember Macedonio – questioned if we are extending for 90days. • Councilmember Creighton – Questioned when you expect to bring a real good budget.

Public Comments:
• Al Hudson – Spoke
Motion to Approve Resolution 10-22-2956: Motion by: Councilmember Creighton 2nd by: Councilmember Kulikoff
AYES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff, Councilmember Macedonio, Mayor O’Laughlin NOES: Mayor Pro Tem Lessenevitch,
VOTE: 4 Yes 1 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion Carried
COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS, AGENDA REQUESTS, AND AB1234 REPORTS This portion of the meeting is reserved for council members to present information, announcements, and items that have come to their attention. The Brown Act precludes Council, staff or public discussion. Short staff responses are appropriate. The Council will take no formal action. A Council member may request the City Clerk to calendar an item for consideration at a future meeting or refer an item to staff. • Councilmember Creighton – Attended Kernkog. Those who travel the 14 to Ridgecrest, there will be reabilitation work beginning January time frame, that will last about 6 months. Asked about the status on contract, to update master fee schedule. Redwood and forest, starting to get cracks on streets. Between moss and sequoia, there are two huge potholes. Hacienda south of Sequoia serious wash boarding. Neuter clinic, 57 animals were fixed. Made a correction on section 21 plan water line replacement.
• Councilmember Macedonio –Attended two days of training on public engagement. • Mayor O’Laughlin – Attended Edwards air show. Asked to get the street inventory from the engineer. Need to start prioritizing streets. Want to see that Desert Jade RFP at the next council meeting. Addressing cannabis ordinance.

ADJOURNMENT
Motion to Adjourn by: Councilmember Creighton 2nd by: Councilmember Kulikoff 69 February 28, 2023

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY

CITY COUNCIL/HOUSING AUTHORITY/SUCESSOR AGENCY
THURSDAY DECEMBER 13, 2022

MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING @ 6:00 PM

COUNCIL CHAMBERS & VIA ZOOM
21000 Hacienda Blvd., California City, CA 93505

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor O’Laughlin called the meeting to order at 6:00pm.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
Pledge of allegiance by: Mayor Pro Tem Lessenevitch.

Invocation by: Pastor Mohr from New Life Assembly of God

ROLL CALL
City Clerk Chavez called roll:

Present: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff, Councilmember Macedonio, Mayor Pro Tem Lessenevitch, Mayor O’Laughlin

Absent:

ADOPT AGENDA
Motion by: Mayor Pro Tem Lessenevitch 2nd by: Councilmember Kulikoff VOTE: 5 Yes 0 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion Carried

NEW BUSINESS
NB 1. Council declares the November 8, 2022, Kern County election results – City Clerk Chavez • City Clerk Chavez – City Council asking to adopt resolution 1222-2959. • Election on 11/08/2022 Kelly Kulikoff elected Mayor. Ron Smith, Michael Kulikoff were elected full term of City Council and Keith Middletem for City Treasurer.

Motion to accept results Motion by: Mayor Pro Tem Lessenevitch 2nd by: Karen Macedonio VOTE: 5 Yes 0 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion Carried
AYES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff, Councilmember Macedonio, Mayor Pro Lessenevitch, Mayor O’Laughlin
NOES: None

COMMENTS BY OUTGOING OFFICIALS/RECOGNITION OF SERVICE
• Mayor Pro Tem Lessenevitch: Gave a speech about the 4 years of service served to the city. • Mayor O’Laughlin: Gave a speech about the honor and privilege of being mayor for 2 years.

TAKING OF THE OATH OF OFFICE
• Mayor: Kelly Kulikoff
• Councilmembers: Michael Kulikoff, Ronald Smith
• East Kern Health Care District: Ruby, Liz and Karen Macedonio 70 February 28, 2023
• City Manager Dr. Jim Hart announce the 57th anniversary of the city. • Mike president of senior center gave a speech.

SECOND ROLL CALL

Present: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff M, Councilmember Macedonio, Councilmember Ron Smith, Mayor Kulikoff

DESIGNATION OF MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
Pursuant to CCMC 2.1.104 (b), Each time a Mayor is seated, the most senior member of the Council who has not yet served as Mayor Pro Tempore shall serve as Mayor Pro Tempore. The council member who has received the most votes during the most recent election shall serve as Mayor Pro Tempore if two council members have equal seniority.

The council member who decline to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore shall be deemed to have served for determining succession. Mayor Pro Tempore shall serve at the pleasure of the council and may be removed by the affirmative vote of majority of the council, in which event a majority of the council shall select a successor.

Council Comments:

Mayor Kulikoff – Mentioned that he heard from city attorneys that there was a dispute on the next Pro Tem.

Councilmember Creighton – Mentioned that first sentence of the code makes the rule of next Pro Tem, which is Macedonio she received more votes, we are both seniors to anybody else in council.

City Attorney- Gave his opinion in regards to sentence “the most senior member of the Council who has not yet served as Mayor Pro Tempore shall serve as Mayor Pro Tempore” Public Comments:

Shawn Bradley – Spoke
Tammy – Spoke
Amanda – Spoke
DJ Twohig – Spoke
Council Comments:

Councilmember Michael – Mentioned that code should be followed and if language is written wrong it should be corrected to avoid interpretation asked to correct.

Councilmember Ron Smith – Mentioned he is disappointed to hear about interpretation.

Motion to approve Councilmember Ron Smith as Mayor Pro Tem by: Mayor Kulikoff 2nd by: Councilmember M. kulikoff
VOTE: 2 Yes 2 Nays 1 Abstain 0 Absent Motion Denied
AYES: Councilmember Kulikoff M, Mayor Kulikoff
NOES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Macedonio, ABSTAIN: Councilmember Smith,

CITY CLERK REPORTS/LATE COMMUNICATIONS
• Correspondence from J.M. Powers dated December 4, 2022, December 5, 2022, & December 6, 2022. He requested they be part of the official record. They will be attached to the minute meetings closest to the date he submitted.
• City Clerk Chaves – Read correspondence from J.M. Powers. 71 February 28, 2023

DEPARTMENT REPORTS
• Planning – NONE
Public Comments:

DJ Twohig – Spoke
Motion to accept reports by: Councilmember Smith 2nd by: Councilmember Creighton VOTE: 5 Yes 0 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion carried
AYES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff M, Councilmember Macedonio, Councilmember Smith, Mayor Kulikoff
NOES:

ABSTAIN:

CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager Dr. Jim Hart – Mentioned how successful tree lighting and parade that occurred on 12/2/2022, heard several positive comments in terms of the amount of people who participated, thanked Theresa, Liz and parks and recs staff.

Councilmember Comments:
• Councilmember Smith- Questioned about a business fined 1.8 million dollars, how much has been collected.

CIVIC/COMMUNITY/ORGANIZATION ANNOUNCEMENTS
• Councilmemember Creighton – This Saturday Reach is having a third annual toy give away at the strata center from 9am-2pm infants to 17 years old.

PUBLIC BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR
This portion of the meeting is reserved for the public to address the City Council on any matter not on the agenda and over which the City Council has jurisdiction. Comments are to be limited to three (3) minutes.

The City Council will receive the comments but cannot engage in back-and-forth discussion with the public or make any decision. The City Council can direct staff to bring the item back to a future agenda for discussion.

Public Comments:

Tammy – Spoke
David – Spoke
Jessica – Spoke
Shawn – Spoke
Fire Association Members – Spoke
David Toledo Miscellaneous Union President – Spoke
Mark G – Spoke
Public Hearing
PH 1. CDBG Funds to build a Soccer Field on Old PAR 3 – Parks and Recreation • Theresa Oaks – The CDBG funds are an amount of approximately 70 thousand dollars. I would like to open it up for council discussion and public discussion, as to how we would like to prioritize 72 February 28, 2023
the spending of about approximately 70 thousand dollars. Grant application is due on December 29th.
• Councilmember Creighton – Questioned: When was this public hearing noticed. Mentioned that in the past anybody wanting to apply for a grant, would have to get approval from council first. • Councilmember Smith – Questioned: What is the estimated cost of water for the year and estimated maintenance for year.
• Councilmember Macedonio – Mentioned she was under the impression that they were a specific amount of money that was allocated to the city each year, and if it was not pulled that year it could be pulled next year with that amount plus more the following year.

Public Comments:

Duane Vasquez – Spoke
Sharon – Spoke
Motion to close Public Testimony by Councilmember Creighton 2nd by: Councilmember Smith VOTE: 5 Yes 0 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion carried
Council Discussion:
• Councilmember Smith – Mentioned: Without knowing the cost for the splash park install and soccer field we should be doing a smaller project to not have a fiscal impact. • Councilmember Creighton – Suggested a motion to upgrade soccer field park.

Motion to file an application for grant to upgrade the soccer field by: Councilmember Creighton 2nd by: Karen Macedonio
VOTE: 5 Yes 0 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion carried
AYES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff M, Councilmember Macedonio, Councilmember Smith, Mayor Kulikoff
NOES:

ABSTAIN:

NEW BUSINESS
NB 2. New Testing format for Dispatchers - by Jesse Hightower, Police Chief Recommendation: Council approves the annual fee of $1,695 for better candidate selection and testing process
• Police Chief Hightower – read his report.

Councilmember Comments:
• Councilmember Creighton – Questioned about POST training. • Councilmember Macedonio – Questioned what the other kern county cities are doing. What are we currently paying for POST.
• Councilmember Smith – Sounds if its going to save money.

Public Comments:

Shawn - Spoke
73 February 28, 2023
Council Discussion:
• Mayor Kulikoff – Agreed with councilmember Smith. Don’t think it should wait if it’s a positive improvement we should deal with it right now.

Motion to approve NB2 by: Councilmember Smith 2nd by: Councilmember Creighton VOTE: 5 Yes 0 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion carried
AYES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff M, Councilmember Macedonio, Councilmember Smith, Mayor Kulikoff
NOES:

ABSTAIN
NB 3. A motion of the City Council of the City of California City to grant an easement in favor of Southern California Edison Company, authorize the City Manager to sign the Grant of Easement, and to authorize the City Engineer the recordation of irrevocable offer of street dedication documents for Record of Survey No. 4094 – by Dr. Jim Hart , Interim City Manager Recommendation: A motion of the City Council of the City of California City to grant an easement in favor of Southern California Edison Company, authorize the City Manager to sign the Grant of Easement, and to authorize the City Engineer the recordation of irrevocable offer of street dedication documents for Record of Survey No. 4094.
• Ramon Pantoja – Presented/read report.

Councilmember Questions:
• Councilmember Creighton – Questioned if any of these is going to be above ground, no new poles.

Don’t want to see the same thing that happened in Mendiburu. • Councilmember Smith – Questioned about new poles.
• Councilmember Macedonio – Questioned if this impact the airport now or in the future.

Public Comments:

NONE
Councilmember Discussion:

NONE
Motion to approve NB3 if any new poles necessary a written consent consultation with the City Manager will be required by: Councilmember Creighton 2nd: Mayor Kulikoff VOTE: 5 Yes 0 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion carried
AYES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff M, Councilmember Macedonio, Councilmember Smith, Mayor Kulikoff
NOES:

ABSTAIN
NB 4. California City’s Industrial, Commercial, and Residential Building Codes - by Mayor Kulikoff Recommendation: Direct the City Manager to bring back an update to California City’s building codes. 74 February 28, 2023
• Mayor Kulikoff – Mentioned the county requirements. Don’t understand why the city is adding more requirements like septic and making it harder for developers to build then the county. Brought up to council to see if they want to potentially move forward with looking over building codes.

Councilmember Questions:
• Councilmember Macedonio – Mentioned that she was told by building that we are following state codes and it would be changing to the upgraded state codes by the 1st of January.

Public Comments:
• DJ Twohig – Spoke
• Shawn – Spoke
Councilmember Discussion:
• Mayor Kulikoff – Mentioned that would like to direct the city manager to look into if the issue is the code issue, is it something we can fix.
• Councilmember Macedonio – Disagree with Mayor’s request. Mentioned that council clarified that we are following the state law.
• Councilmember Kulikoff M – Questioned is there anything that is being required in California City that the county does not.
• Councilmember Creighton – Questioned if we can potentially ask the City Manager to get a staff member to pull all contractor in town to see if they have any issues with the consultants and if so list them.
• Councilmember Smith – Mentioned about consents with developers.

Public Comments 2nd call:

DJ Twohig - Spoke
Motion to direct city manager to choose how he wants to manage/review and come back with his findings by: Councilmember Smith 2nd by: Councilmember Creighton VOTE: 5 Yes 0 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion carried
AYES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff M, Councilmember Macedonio, Councilmember Smith, Mayor Kulikoff
NOES:

ABSTAIN
NB 5. The future of all Commissions – by Mayor Kulikoff Recommendation:

Direct the City Manager per City Council direction
• Mayor Kulikoff – Mentioned that planning and parks commission, using a lot of resources and nothing is really getting done. Temporarily suspend all commissions and bring everything to council, once cleaned up then we bring back commissions.

Councilmember Questions:
• Councilmember Macedonio – Asked City Attorney to clarify if city council is allowed to suspend the commission, is it on the municipal code.
75 February 28, 2023
• Councilmember Smith – Questioned if purpose is to streamline.

Public Comments:
• DJ Twohig – Spoke
• Jay Dunham – Spoke
• Duane Vasquez – Spoke
• Shawn – Spoke
• Carla Conry – Spoke
• Tammy – Spoke
• Carla Conry - Spoke
Councilmember Discussion:
• Mayor Kulikoff – Mentioned that work from commissioner is appreciated. A suspension of 6 month will make sense so we are not wasting their time.
• Councilmember Smith – Mentioned is a tough decision. A lot to observed in one meeting. Need an inhouse planner.
• Councilmember Creighton – Agreed with comments of the public. • Councilmember Macedonio - Mentioned that we had planning commission meetings cancelled since 2018, not enough staff. Can we give them what they need, to be able to do the work. • Councilmember Kulikoff M – Questioned if there any examples of other cities that had suspended planning commission or parks commission.

Public comment 2nd call:
• DJ Twohig – Spoke
• Kim – Spoke
• Shawn – Spoke
• Carla Conry – Spoke
• Jay Dunham – Spoke
Motion to trail Discussion Item on first meeting of January by: Mayor Kulikoff 2nd by:

Councilmember Smith
VOTE: 3 Yes 2 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion carried
AYES: Councilmember Kulikoff M, Councilmember Smith, Mayor Kulikoff NOES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Macedonio, ABSTAIN:

NB 6. Update the Exterior of City Hall including Signage and Landscaping – by Mayor Kulikoff Recommendation: Direct the City Manager per City Council direction. • Mayor Kulikoff – Need to clean up landscaping in city hall.

Councilmember Questions:
• Councilmember Macedonio – Questioned why we are starting all over again, we already determined that parking lot belongs to city hall, not to the post office. Already determined that the citizens do not want the cars parked outside the back door of city hall. 76 February 28, 2023
• Councilmember Creighton – building needs to be worked on first then the landscape. Building on outside needs a lot of work. Mentioned he was approached by a developer in town with couple others are willing to put in labor for free if the city pays for material. Developer will donate labor.

Public Comments:
• DJ Twohig – Spoke
• Duane Vasquez – Spoke
• Shawn – Spoke
• Ivan Padron – Spoke
• Tammy – Spoke
Council Discussion:
• Councilmember Smith – Mentioned building needs work. Do small stuff while planning for big stuff. • Mayor Kulikoff – Break broken concrete, have some ideas on how sign will look. Start something to push it forward.

Motion to have City Manager Direct clean up outside city hall, and provide council with estimate for a monument sign by: Councilmember Creighton 2nd by: Councilmember Macedonio VOTE: 5 Yes 0 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion carried
AYES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Kulikoff M, Councilmember Macedonio, Councilmember Smith, Mayor Kulikoff
NOES:

ABSTAIN:

NB 7. Fast Track Resolution 10-22-2952 Discussion and Reconsideration – by Mayor Kulikoff Recommendation: Reconsider the separation of Resolution 10-22-2952. Discuss Resolution 10-22-2952.

City Council to direct The City Manager
• Mayor Kulikoff read resolution.
• City Manager Dr. Hart – Mentioned that council needs to discuss this and make a determination on whether they want to put this back together, if so, we will bring back to you with a different resolution number or bring back with the same number.
• Councilmember Macedonio – Asked if we have to repeal the decision that was made on 10-22- 2955.
• Councilmember Smith – Asked if there’s an error in numbering, 2nd page on the top.

Public Comments:
• DJ Twohig – Spoke
Council Discussion:
• Councilmember Creighton – Pointed out Section 2 trough 8 of 2952, there only 2 paragraphs were modification were made, but do not affect intent of 2955. • Councilmember Smith – We need strong policy.
77 February 28, 2023
Motion for council to direct staff to bring back a new resolution by: Mayor Kulikoff 2nd by:

Councilmember Kulikoff M.

VOTE: 3 Yes 2 Nays 0 Abstain 0 Absent Motion carried
AYES: Councilmember Kulikoff M, Councilmember Smith, Mayor Kulikoff NOES: Councilmember Creighton, Councilmember Macedonio, ABSTAIN:

COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS, AGENDA REQUESTS, AND AB1234 REPORTS This portion of the meeting is reserved for council members to present information, announcements, and items that have come to their attention. The Brown Act precludes Council, staff or public discussion. Short staff responses are appropriate. The Council will take no formal action. A Council member may request the City Clerk to calendar an item for consideration at a future meeting or refer an item to staff. • Councilmember Creighton – Month of December no kern kog meeting. • Councilmember Kulikoff M – None
• Councilmember Macedonio – None
• Councilmember Smith – Would like to see agendized as soon as possible a special tax discussion. • Mayor Kulikoff – for future AB1234 not discuss items that were in the agenda. Bring back discussion item for park not commision, ask city manager to bring fire department estimates. Bring discussion for corridor studies around rite aid. Remind city manager about townhall. Bring a discussion on January for city council to discuss goals.

ADJOURNMENT
Motion to Adjourn by Councilmember Creighton 2nd by: Mayor Kulikoff 78 February 28, 2023

CITY COUNCIL
DATE: February 28, 2023
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dr. Jim Hart, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption by First Reading of Ordinance No. 24-801 Amending Section 2-1.104 (Presiding Officer) of Article 1 (Role of the Council) of Chapter 1 (City Council) of Title 2 (Administration) of the California City Municipal Code
_____________________________________________________________________________________

BACKGROUND
On October 21, 2014, the City Council of the City of California City (“City Council”) adopted Ordinance No. 14-725 which updated and amended Title 2 (Administration), including setting the process for appointing the Mayor Pro Tempore. The most recent selection of Mayor Pro Tempore after the November 2022 General California City (“City”) Election resulted in discussion of the multiple interpretations of the process for appointment. At this time, the City Council desires to clarify the process for appointment to avoid any further ambiguity in the selection process.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt by first reading, Ordinance No. 24-801 Amending Section 2-

1.104 (Presiding Officer) of Article 1 (Role of the Council) of Chapter 1 (City Council) of Title 2 (Administration) of the California City Municipal Code.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This Action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

ATTACHMENTS:

Ordinance No. 24-801
CB 1.
79 February 28, 2023
ORDINANCE NO. 24-801

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF CALIFORNIA CITY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING
SECTION 2-1.104 (PRESIDING OFFICER) OF ARTICLE 1
(ROLE OF THE COUNCIL) OF CHAPTER 1 (CITY
COUNCIL) OF TITLE 2 (ADMINISTRATION) OF THE

CALIFORNIA CITY MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, on October 21, 2014, the City Council of the City of California City (“City Council”) adopted Ordinance No. 14-725 which updated and amended Title 2 (Administration), including setting the process for appointing the Mayor Pro Tempore; and
WHEREAS, the most recent selection of Mayor Pro Tempore after the November 2022 General California City (“City”) Election resulted in discussion of the multiple interpretations of the process for appointment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to clarify the process for appointment to avoid any further ambiguity in the selection process.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The facts set forth in the recitals above are true and correct.

Section 2. Section 2-1.104 (Presiding Officer) of Article 1 (Role of the Council) of Chapter 1 (City Council) of Title 2 (Administration) of the California City Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“Section 2-1.104 Presiding Officer.
a) The Mayor shall be the presiding officer for the meetings of the Council. In the absence of the Mayor, the Mayor Pro Tempore shall preside over meetings of the Council.
b) Each time a Mayor is seated, the most senior member of the Council who has not yet served as Mayor Pro Tempore shall serve as Mayor Pro Tempore. If multiple members have equal seniority, the member who received the most votes during the election which resulted in their current seat, shall serve as Mayor Pro Tempore.
i. Newly elected members shall not be considered eligible for the position of Mayor Pro Tempore unless all remaining senior members of Council have been disqualified due to either:
80 February 28, 2023
1) Having already served as Mayor Pro Tempore during the term of their current seat; or
2) A senior member declining the position of Mayor Pro
Tempore.
ii. Any council member who declines to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore shall be deemed to have served for the purpose of determining succession. Mayor Pro Tempore shall serve at the pleasure of the Council and may be removed by the affirmative vote of majority of the Council, in which event a majority of the Council shall select a successor.”
Section 3. CEQA. This Ordinance is not subject to CEQA under the general rule set forth in Section 15601(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines that CEQA only applies to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

Section 4. Inconsistent Provisions. Any provision of the California City Municipal Code, or appendices thereto, that conflicts with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such conflict and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to the extent necessary to affect the provisions of this Ordinance.

Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, or any part thereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 6. Construction. This Ordinance is intended to supplement, not to duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in light of that intent. To the extent the provisions of the California City Municipal Code as amended by this Ordinance are substantially the same as the provisions of that Code as it read prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, those amended provisions shall be construed as continuations of the earlier provisions and not as new enactments.

Section 7. Publication and Effective Date. The Mayor shall sign, and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause the same to be published once in the official newspaper within fifteen (15) days after its adoption.

This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of California City 81 February 28, 2023
this XXX day of XXXX 2023.
________________________________
Kelly Kulikoff, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Socorro Chavez, City Clerk
82 February 28, 2023

CITY COUNCIL
DATE: February 28, 2023
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dr. Jim Hart, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Employment Agreement for the Acting City Manager and Adoption by Resolution No. 02-23-2967 Amending the 2022-2023 Citywide Salary Schedule _____________________________________________________________________________________

BACKGROUND
The City is currently recruiting to fill the vacant position of City Manager, and the current Interim City Manager, Dr. Jim Hart, is a retired annuitant who cannot work more than 960 hours in a fiscal year. As Dr.

Hart’s 960-hour cap is approaching, the City Council wishes to appoint OHV Manager, Inge Elmes, as Acting City Manager to serve until a permanent City Manager is hired. To comply with CalPERS regulations, the salary for this temporary position needs to be in a publicly available pay schedule and meet other legal requirements. An employment agreement with Ms. Elme’s for the position of Acting City Manager is also appropriate and recommended.

Government Code section 20480 limits temporary pay upgrades (“acting pay”) for out-of-class service while an employer is recruiting to fill a staffing vacancy. Government Code section 20480(f) defines “out of class appointment” as “an appointment of an employee to an upgraded position or higher classification by the employer or governing board or body in a vacant position.” Employers may only provide temporary pay upgrades to employees for 960 hours per fiscal year.

The attached Employment Agreement limits Ms. Elme’s appointment as Acting City Manager to no more than 960 hours and includes the tracking and CalPERS reporting requirements. Government Code section 20480 also requires that compensation for out-of-class appointments be pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement or a publicly available pay schedule that complies with California Code of Regulations section 570.5. To comply with the requirements of Government Code section 20480, the proposed Resolution has been prepared to amend the Citywide Salary Schedule for 2022-2023 to include a pay schedule for the position of Acting City Manager.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Employment Agreement for Acting City Manager and adopt Resolution No. 02-23-2967.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This Action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

ATTACHMENTS:

Employment Agreement for Acting City Manager
Resolution No. 02-23-2967
NB 1.
83 February 28, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. 02-23-2967

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY

AMENDING THE CITYWIDE SALARY SCHEDULE TO ESTABLISH A PAY

SCHEDULE FOR THE POSITION OF ACTING CITY MANAGER
WHEREAS, the position of City Manager is currently vacant, and the City desires to appoint the OHV Manager to serve as Acting City Manager while the City actively recruits for; and
WHEREAS, this appointment will constitute an “out-of-class appointment” under Government Code section 20480; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 20480 requires that compensation for out-of-class appointments be made pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement or a publicly available pay schedule; and
WHEREAS, publicly available pay schedules must comply with California Code of Regulations section 570.5 (“CCR 570.5”); and
WHEREAS, to comply with Government Code section 20480 and CCR 570.5, the City wishes to revise its 2022-2023 Citywide Salary Schedule to establish a pay schedule for the position of Acting City Manager.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DECLARED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of California City as follows:

SECTION 1. The revised 2022-2023 City of California City Salary Schedule is hereby approved and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A.

SECTION 2. Consistent with CCR 570.5, the pay rate and pay schedule for the position of Acting City Manager shall be based upon an annual base salary of One Sixteen Thousand Dollars ($116,000).

SECTION 4. This Resolution and the salaries contained in Exhibit A shall constitute a publicly available pay schedule as required by Government Code section 20480. In accordance with CCR 570.5, the revised 2022-2023 City of California City Salary Schedule shall be immediately accessible and available for public review during the City’s normal business hours.

SECTION 5. The revised 2022-2023 City of California City Salary Schedule shall be effective immediately on the date of the adoption of this Resolution. This Resolution and the salary schedule attached hereto shall be retained by the City in its official records on a permanent basis.
84 February 28, 2023
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of California City on the 28th day of February by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
__________________________________________
Kelly Kulifoff, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Socorro Chavez, City Clerk
85 February 28, 2023

EXHIBIT A
CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY 2022-2023 SALARY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 28, 2023
86 February 28, 2023
87 February 28, 2023
88 February 28, 2023
89 February 28, 2023
90 February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Misc Account Clerk I 19 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 16.61 1328.80 2879.07
3 17.44 1395.24 3023.02
4 18.31 1465.00 3174.17
5 19.23 1538.25 3332.88
6 20.19 1615.16 3499.52
Misc Account Clerk II 29 1 20.20 1616.00 3501.33
2 21.21 1696.80 3676.40
3 22.27 1781.64 3860.22
4 23.38 1870.72 4053.23
5 24.55 1964.26 4255.89
6 25.78 2062.47 4468.69
Misc Account Clerk III 33 1 22.28 1782.40 3861.87
2 23.39 1871.52 4054.96
3 24.56 1965.10 4257.71
4 25.79 2063.35 4470.59
5 27.08 2166.52 4694.12
6 28.44 2274.84 4928.83
Misc Administrative Clerk 19 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 16.61 1328.80 2879.07
3 17.44 1395.24 3023.02
4 18.31 1465.00 3174.17
5 19.23 1538.25 3332.88
6 20.19 1615.16 3499.52
Misc Administrative Secretary 52 1 22.02 1761.60 3816.80 2 23.12 1849.68 4007.64
3 24.28 1942.16 4208.02
4 25.49 2039.27 4418.42
5 26.77 2141.24 4639.34
6 28.10 2248.30 4871.31
Misc Airport Maint/OP Specialist 23 1 17.47 1397.60 3028.13 2 18.34 1467.48 3179.54
3 19.26 1540.85 3338.52
4 20.22 1617.90 3505.44
5 21.23 1698.79 3680.71
6 22.30 1783.73 3864.75
Updated January 10, 2023
91 1
February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Misc Airport Manager 36 1 23.93 1914.40 4147.87
2 25.13 2010.12 4355.26
3 26.38 2110.63 4573.02
4 27.70 2216.16 4801.67
5 29.09 2326.97 5041.76
6 30.54 2443.31 5293.85
Misc Building Inspector 33 1 22.28 1782.40 3861.87
2 23.39 1871.52 4054.96
3 24.56 1965.10 4257.71
4 25.79 2063.35 4470.59
5 27.08 2166.52 4694.12
6 28.44 2274.84 4928.83
Misc Clerk Typist 15 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.70 1336.00 2894.67
Misc Cross Connection Specialist 55 1 29.10 2328.00 5044.00 2 30.56 2444.40 5296.20
3 32.08 2566.62 5561.01
4 33.69 2694.95 5839.06
5 35.37 2829.70 6131.01
6 37.14 2971.18 6437.56
Misc Data Processing/Analyst 33 1 22.28 1782.40 3861.87 2 23.39 1871.52 4054.96
3 24.56 1965.10 4257.71
4 25.79 2063.35 4470.59
5 27.08 2166.52 4694.12
6 28.44 2274.84 4928.83
Misc Deputy City Clerk 52 1 22.28 1782.40 3861.87
2 23.39 1871.52 4054.96
3 24.56 1965.10 4257.71
4 25.79 2063.35 4470.59
5 27.08 2166.52 4694.12
6 28.44 2274.84 4928.83
Updated January 10, 2023
92 2
February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Misc Dial-A-Ride Driver/Dispatcher 19 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 16.61 1328.80 2879.07
3 17.44 1395.24 3023.02
4 18.31 1465.00 3174.17
5 19.23 1538.25 3332.88
6 20.19 1615.16 3499.52
Misc Distribution Operator II 33 1 22.28 1782.40 3861.87 2 23.39 1871.52 4054.96
3 24.56 1965.10 4257.71
4 25.79 2063.35 4470.59
5 27.08 2166.52 4694.12
6 28.44 2274.84 4928.83
Misc Facilities Maintenance Supervisor 55 1 29.10 2328.00 5044.00 2 30.56 2444.40 5296.20
3 32.08 2566.62 5561.01
4 33.69 2694.95 5839.06
5 35.37 2829.70 6131.01
6 37.14 2971.18 6437.56
Misc Garage Superintendent 35 1 29.10 2328.00 5044.00
2 30.56 2444.40 5296.20
3 32.08 2566.62 5561.01
4 33.69 2694.95 5839.06
5 35.37 2829.70 6131.01
6 37.14 2971.18 6437.56
Misc General Service Worker 14 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.30 1304.00 2825.33
Misc Gen Serv Wkr/Park Aide 14 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.30 1304.00 2825.33
Updated January 10, 2023
93 3
February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Misc Heavy Equipment Mech. I 29 1 20.21 1616.80 3503.07 2 21.22 1697.64 3678.22
3 22.28 1782.52 3862.13
4 23.40 1871.65 4055.24
5 24.57 1965.23 4258.00
6 25.79 2063.49 4470.90
Misc Heavy Equipment Mech II 33 1 22.28 1782.40 3861.87 2 23.39 1871.52 4054.96
3 24.56 1965.10 4257.71
4 25.79 2063.35 4470.59
5 27.08 2166.52 4694.12
6 28.44 2274.84 4928.83
Misc Heavy Equipment Operator I 27 1 19.25 1540.00 3336.67 2 20.21 1617.00 3503.50
3 21.22 1697.85 3678.68
4 22.28 1782.74 3862.61
5 23.40 1871.88 4055.74
6 24.57 1965.47 4258.53
Misc Heavy Equipment Operator II 31 1 21.20 1696.00 3674.67 2 22.26 1780.80 3858.40
3 23.37 1869.84 4051.32
4 24.54 1963.33 4253.89
5 25.77 2061.50 4466.58
6 27.06 2164.57 4689.91
Misc Janitor Administator 18 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 16.24 1299.20 2814.93
4 17.05 1364.16 2955.68
5 17.90 1432.37 3103.46
6 18.80 1503.99 3258.64
Misc Lead Dial-A-Ride Driver/Disp. 30 1 20.72 1657.60 3591.47 2 21.76 1740.48 3771.04
3 22.84 1827.50 3959.59
4 23.99 1918.88 4157.57
5 25.19 2014.82 4365.45
6 26.44 2115.56 4583.72
Updated January 10, 2023
94 4
February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Misc Maintenance Worker I 23 1 17.47 1397.60 3028.13
2 18.34 1467.48 3179.54
3 19.26 1540.85 3338.52
4 20.22 1617.90 3505.44
5 21.23 1698.79 3680.71
6 22.30 1783.73 3864.75
Misc Maintenance Worker II 27 1 19.25 1540.00 3336.67
2 20.21 1617.00 3503.50
3 21.22 1697.85 3678.68
4 22.28 1782.74 3862.61
5 23.40 1871.88 4055.74
6 24.57 1965.47 4258.53
Misc OHV Clerk 19 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 16.30 1303.95 2825.22
5 17.11 1369.15 2966.48
6 17.97 1437.60 3114.81
Misc Operator in Training Pumping 23 1 17.47 1397.60 3028.13 2 18.34 1467.48 3179.54
3 19.26 1540.85 3338.52
4 20.22 1617.90 3505.44
5 21.23 1698.79 3680.71
6 22.30 1783.73 3864.75
Misc Operator in Training Water 23 1 17.47 1397.60 3028.13 2 18.34 1467.48 3179.54
3 19.26 1540.85 3338.52
4 20.22 1617.90 3505.44
5 21.23 1698.79 3680.71
6 22.30 1783.73 3864.75
Misc Operator in Training WWTP 23 1 17.47 1397.60 3028.13 2 18.34 1467.48 3179.54
3 19.26 1540.85 3338.52
4 20.22 1617.90 3505.44
5 21.23 1698.79 3680.71
6 22.30 1783.73 3864.75
Updated January 10, 2023
95 5
February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Misc Pumping Operator II 33 1 22.28 1782.40 3861.87
2 23.39 1871.52 4054.96
3 24.56 1965.10 4257.71
4 25.79 2063.35 4470.59
5 27.08 2166.52 4694.12
6 28.44 2274.84 4928.83
Misc Pumping Operator III 55 1 29.09 2327.20 5042.27
2 30.54 2443.56 5294.38
3 32.07 2565.74 5559.10
4 33.68 2694.02 5837.05
5 35.36 2828.73 6128.91
6 37.13 2970.16 6435.35
Misc Receptionist 33 1 20.21 1616.80 3503.07
2 21.22 1697.64 3678.22
3 22.28 1782.52 3862.13
4 23.40 1871.65 4055.24
5 24.57 1965.23 4258.00
6 25.79 2063.49 4470.90
Misc Recreation Assistant 17 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 16.61 1328.80 2879.07
4 17.44 1395.24 3023.02
5 18.31 1465.00 3174.17
6 19.23 1538.25 3332.88
Misc Secretary 30 1 20.71 1656.80 3589.73
2 21.75 1739.64 3769.22
3 22.83 1826.62 3957.68
4 23.97 1917.95 4155.57
5 25.17 2013.85 4363.34
6 26.43 2114.54 4581.51
Misc Senior Bldg Maint Worker 33 1 22.28 1782.40 3861.87 2 23.39 1871.52 4054.96
3 24.56 1965.10 4257.71
4 25.79 2063.35 4470.59
5 27.08 2166.52 4694.12
6 28.44 2274.84 4928.83
Updated January 10, 2023
96 6
February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Misc Senior Clerk Typist 19 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 16.61 1328.80 2879.07
3 17.44 1395.24 3023.02
4 18.31 1465.00 3174.17
5 19.23 1538.25 3332.88
6 20.19 1615.16 3499.52
Misc Streets Lead 55 1 29.10 2328.00 5044.00
2 30.56 2444.40 5296.20
3 32.08 2566.62 5561.01
4 33.69 2694.95 5839.06
5 35.37 2829.70 6131.01
6 37.14 2971.18 6437.56
Misc Utility Billing Supervisor 53 1 24.55 1964.00 4255.33 2 25.78 2062.20 4468.10
3 27.07 2165.31 4691.51
4 28.42 2273.58 4926.08
5 29.84 2387.25 5172.38
6 31.33 2506.62 5431.00
Misc Distribution Operator II 33 1 22.28 1782.40 3861.87 2 23.39 1871.52 4054.96
3 24.56 1965.10 4257.71
4 25.79 2063.35 4470.59
5 27.08 2166.52 4694.12
6 28.44 2274.84 4928.83
Misc Water Operator Lead 54 1 27.63 2210.40 4789.20
2 29.01 2320.92 5028.66
3 30.46 2436.97 5280.09
4 31.99 2558.81 5544.10
5 33.58 2686.76 5821.30
6 35.26 2821.09 6112.37
Misc WWTP Operator II 33 1 22.28 1782.40 3861.87
2 23.39 1871.52 4054.96
3 24.56 1965.10 4257.71
4 25.79 2063.35 4470.59
5 27.08 2166.52 4694.12
6 28.44 2274.84 4928.83
Updated January 10, 2023
97 7
February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Misc WWTP Operator III 55 1 29.10 2328.00 5044.00
2 30.56 2444.40 5296.20
3 32.08 2566.62 5561.01
4 33.69 2694.95 5839.06
5 35.37 2829.70 6131.01
6 37.14 2971.18 6437.56
Misc WWTP Chief Plant Operator 38 1 33.51 2680.80 5808.40 2 35.19 2814.84 6098.82
3 36.94 2955.58 6403.76
4 38.79 3103.36 6723.95
5 40.73 3258.53 7060.15
6 42.77 3421.46 7413.15
Updated January 10, 2023
98 8
February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Police Dept Animal Control Officer 23 1 17.28 1382.40 2995.20 2 18.14 1451.52 3144.96
3 19.05 1524.10 3302.21
4 20.00 1600.30 3467.32
5 21.00 1680.32 3640.68
6 22.05 1764.33 3822.72
Police Dept Animal Control Supervisor 33 1 22.03 1762.40 3818.53 2 23.13 1850.52 4009.46
3 24.29 1943.05 4209.93
4 25.50 2040.20 4420.43
5 26.78 2142.21 4641.45
6 28.12 2249.32 4873.52
Police Dept Corrections Officer/Jailer 28 1 22.30 1784.00 3865.33 2 23.42 1873.20 4058.60
3 24.59 1966.86 4261.53
4 25.82 2065.20 4474.61
5 27.11 2168.46 4698.34
6 28.46 2276.89 4933.25
Police Dept Code Enforcement Officer 34 1 22.58 1806.40 3913.87 2 23.71 1896.72 4109.56
3 24.89 1991.56 4315.04
4 26.14 2091.13 4530.79
5 27.45 2195.69 4757.33
6 28.82 2305.48 4995.20
Police Dept CSO 19 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 16.46 1316.80 2853.07
3 17.28 1382.64 2995.72
4 18.15 1451.77 3145.51
5 19.05 1524.36 3302.78
6 20.01 1600.58 3467.92
Police Dept CSO Officer II 28 1 20.46 1636.80 3546.40
2 21.48 1718.64 3723.72
3 22.56 1804.57 3909.91
4 23.69 1894.80 4105.40
5 24.87 1989.54 4310.67
6 26.11 2089.02 4526.20
Updated January 10, 2023
99 9
February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Police Dept Police Admin Aide 15 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 16.22 1297.60 2811.47
5 17.03 1362.48 2952.04
6 17.88 1430.60 3099.64
Police Dept Police Clerk/Dispatcher 23 1 20.72 1657.60 3591.47 2 21.76 1740.48 3771.04
3 22.84 1827.50 3959.59
4 23.99 1918.88 4157.57
5 25.19 2014.82 4365.45
6 26.44 2115.56 4583.72
Police Dept Police Corporal/Police Officer II 85 1 29.42 2353.60 5099.47 2 30.89 2471.28 5354.44
3 32.44 2594.84 5622.16
4 34.06 2724.59 5903.27
5 35.76 2860.82 6198.43
6 37.55 3003.86 6508.36
Police Dept Police Lieutenant 76 1 40.69 3255.20 7052.93 2 42.72 3417.96 7405.58
3 44.86 3588.86 7775.86
4 47.10 3768.30 8164.65
5 49.46 3956.72 8572.88
6 51.93 4154.55 9001.53
Police Dept Police Officer 74 1 28.36 2268.80 4915.73
2 29.78 2382.24 5161.52
3 31.27 2501.35 5419.60
4 32.83 2626.42 5690.58
5 34.47 2757.74 5975.10
6 36.20 2895.63 6273.86
Police Dept Police Officer Trainee 74 1 23.52 1881.60 4076.80 2 24.70 1975.68 4280.64
3 25.93 2074.46 4494.67
4 27.23 2178.19 4719.41
5 28.59 2287.10 4955.38
6 30.02 2401.45 5203.14
Updated January 10, 2023
100
10 February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Police Dept Police Sergeant 75 1 34.45 2756.00 5971.33
2 36.17 2893.80 6269.90
3 37.98 3038.49 6583.40
4 39.88 3190.41 6912.56
5 41.87 3349.94 7258.19
6 43.97 3517.43 7621.10
Police Dept Police Special Investigator 77 1 31.22 2497.60 5411.47 2 32.78 2622.48 5682.04
3 34.42 2753.60 5966.14
4 36.14 2891.28 6264.45
5 37.95 3035.85 6577.67
6 39.85 3187.64 6906.56
Police Dept Records Clerk 19 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 16.45 1316.00 2851.33
3 17.27 1381.80 2993.90
4 18.14 1450.89 3143.60
5 19.04 1523.43 3300.77
6 20.00 1599.61 3465.81
Updated January 10, 2023
101
11 February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Fire Fire Fighter/ Paramedic 73 1 20.24 2266.88 4911.57 2 21.25 2380.22 5157.15
3 22.31 2499.24 5415.01
4 23.43 2624.20 5685.76
5 24.60 2755.41 5970.05
6 25.83 2893.18 6268.55
Fire Fire Apparatus Engineer 78 1 22.21 2487.52 5389.63 2 23.32 2611.90 5659.11
3 24.49 2742.49 5942.06
4 25.71 2879.62 6239.17
5 27.00 3023.60 6551.12
6 28.35 3174.78 6878.68
Fire Fire Captain 83 1 27.52 3082.24 6678.19
2 28.90 3236.35 7012.10
3 30.34 3398.17 7362.70
4 31.86 3568.08 7730.84
5 33.45 3746.48 8117.38
6 35.12 3933.81 8523.25
Fire Fire Captain II 84 1 31.24 3498.88 7580.91
2 32.80 2624.16 7959.95
3 34.44 2755.37 8357.95
4 36.16 2893.14 8775.85
5 37.97 3037.79 9214.64
6 39.87 3189.68 9675.37
Updated January 10, 2023
102
12 February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Exempt Accountant 49 1 33.58 2686.40 5820.53
2 35.26 2820.72 6111.56
3 37.02 2961.76 6417.14
4 38.87 3109.84 6737.99
5 40.82 3265.34 7074.89
6 42.86 3428.60 7428.64
Exempt Administrative Assistant 53 1 24.47 1957.60 4241.47 2 25.69 2055.48 4453.54
3 26.98 2158.25 4676.22
4 28.33 2266.17 4910.03
5 29.74 2379.48 5155.53
6 31.23 2498.45 5413.31
Exempt Associate Planner 39 1 25.79 2063.20 4470.27
2 27.08 2166.36 4693.78
3 28.43 2274.68 4928.47
4 29.86 2388.41 5174.89
5 31.35 2507.83 5433.64
6 32.92 2633.22 5705.32
Exempt Cannabis Program Manager 37 1 31.51 2520.80 5461.73 2 33.09 2646.84 5734.82
3 34.74 2779.18 6021.56
4 36.48 2918.14 6322.64
5 38.30 3064.05 6638.77
6 40.22 3217.25 6970.71
Exempt Chief Water Operator 81 1 43.00 3440.18 7453.72
2 45.15 3612.19 7826.41
3 47.41 3792.80 8217.73
4 49.78 3982.44 8628.62
5 52.27 4181.56 9060.05
6 54.88 4390.64 9513.05
Exempt City Clerk 49 1 33.58 2686.40 5820.53
2 35.26 2820.72 6111.56
3 37.02 2961.76 6417.14
4 38.87 3109.84 6737.99
5 40.82 3265.34 7074.89
6 42.86 3428.60 7428.64
Updated January 10, 2023
103
13 February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Exempt City Manager 86 1 86.54 6923.20 15000.27
Exempt City Manager Contract 86 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 57.70 4616.00 10001.33
Exempt Acting City Manager 1 9666.67
Exempt Executive Administrative Assistant 55 1 29.10 2328.00 5044.00 2 30.56 2444.40 5296.20
3 32.08 2566.62 5561.01
4 33.69 2694.95 5839.06
5 35.37 2829.70 6131.01
6 37.14 2971.18 6437.56
Exempt Finance Dir/ Assis. City Mgr. 82 1 46.20 3696.00 8008.00 2 48.51 3880.80 8408.40
3 50.94 4074.84 8828.82
4 53.48 4278.58 9270.26
5 56.16 4492.51 9733.77
6 58.96 4717.14 10220.46
Exempt Fire Chief 56 1 46.20 3696.00 8008.00
2 48.51 3880.80 8408.40
3 50.94 4074.84 8828.82
4 53.48 4278.58 9270.26
5 56.16 4492.51 9733.77
6 58.96 4717.14 10220.46
Updated January 10, 2023
104
14 February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Exempt Fire Mashal 57 1 40.22 3217.60 6971.47
2 42.23 3378.48 7320.04
3 44.34 3547.40 7686.04
4 46.56 3724.77 8070.34
5 48.89 3911.01 8473.86
6 51.33 4106.56 8897.55
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Exempt Housing Manager 40 1 26.42 2113.60 4579.47
2 27.74 2219.28 4808.44
3 29.13 2330.24 5048.86
4 30.58 2446.76 5301.31
5 32.11 2569.09 5566.37
6 33.72 2697.55 5844.69
Exempt Human Resource Director 60 1 46.20 3696.00 8008.00 2 48.51 3880.80 8408.40
3 50.94 4074.84 8828.82
4 53.48 4278.58 9270.26
5 56.16 4492.51 9733.77
6 58.96 4717.14 10220.46
Exempt Human Resource Generalist 52 1 31.22 2497.60 5411.47 2 32.78 2622.48 5682.04
3 34.42 2753.60 5966.14
4 36.14 2891.28 6264.45
5 37.95 3035.85 6577.67
6 39.85 3187.64 6906.56
Exempt OHV Manager 53 1 31.34 2507.20 5432.27
2 32.91 2632.56 5703.88
3 34.55 2764.19 5989.07
4 36.28 2902.40 6288.53
5 38.09 3047.52 6602.95
6 40.00 3199.89 6933.10
Exempt Payroll Generalist 43 1 28.36 2268.80 4915.73
2 29.78 2382.24 5161.52
3 31.27 2501.35 5419.60
4 32.83 2626.42 5690.58
5 34.47 2757.74 5975.10
6 36.20 2895.63 6273.86
Updated January 10, 2023
105
15 February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Exempt Planning Tech. Econ. Develop. 39 1 25.78 2062.40 4468.53 2 27.07 2165.52 4691.96
3 28.42 2273.80 4926.56
4 29.84 2387.49 5172.89
5 31.34 2506.86 5431.53
6 32.90 2632.20 5703.11
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Exempt Planning/Econ Dev Admin 55 1 29.10 2328.00 5044.00 2 30.56 2444.40 5296.20
3 32.08 2566.62 5561.01
4 33.69 2694.95 5839.06
5 35.37 2829.70 6131.01
6 37.14 2971.18 6437.56
Exempt Police Chief 60 1 68.01 5440.80 11788.40
2 71.41 5712.84 12377.82
3 74.98 5998.48 12996.71
4 78.73 6298.41 13646.55
5 82.67 6613.33 14328.87
6 86.80 6943.99 15045.32
Exempt Public Works Director 56 1 46.20 3696.00 8008.00 2 48.51 3880.80 8408.40
3 50.94 4074.84 8828.82
4 53.48 4278.58 9270.26
5 56.16 4492.51 9733.77
6 58.96 4717.14 10220.46
Exempt Public Works Director (contract) 86 1 41.36 3308.80 7169.07 2 43.43 3474.24 7527.52
3 45.60 3647.95 7903.90
4 47.88 3830.35 8299.09
5 50.27 4021.87 8714.05
6 52.79 4222.96 9149.75
Exempt Recreation Coordinator 33 1 22.28 1782.40 3861.87 2 23.39 1871.52 4054.96
3 24.56 1965.10 4257.71
4 25.79 2063.35 4470.59
5 27.08 2166.52 4694.12
6 28.44 2274.84 4928.83
Updated January 10, 2023
106
16 February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Exempt Recreation Supervisor 36 1 23.93 1914.40 4147.87 2 25.13 2010.12 4355.26
3 26.38 2110.63 4573.02
4 27.70 2216.16 4801.67
5 29.09 2326.97 5041.76
6 30.54 2443.31 5293.85
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Exempt Senior Building Official 38 1 33.51 2680.80 5808.40 2 35.19 2814.84 6098.82
3 36.94 2955.58 6403.76
4 38.79 3103.36 6723.95
5 40.73 3258.53 7060.15
6 42.77 3421.46 7413.15
Exempt Water Operator Supervisor 55 1 29.10 2328.00 5044.00 2 30.56 2444.40 5296.20
3 32.08 2566.62 5561.01
4 33.69 2694.95 5839.06
5 35.37 2829.70 6131.01
6 37.14 2971.18 6437.56
Updated January 10, 2023
107
17 February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Class Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
PART TIME Airport Maintenance (P/T) 18 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.00 1280.00 2773.33
Animal Control Officer 23 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 16.14 1291.20 2797.60
4 16.95 1355.76 2937.48
5 17.79 1423.20 3083.60
6 18.68 1494.36 3237.78
Clerk Typist 15 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.00 1280.00 2773.33
Code Enforcement Officer 34 1 19.12 1529.60 3314.13
2 20.08 1606.08 3479.84
3 21.08 1686.38 3653.83
4 22.13 1770.70 3836.52
5 23.24 1859.24 4028.35
6 24.40 1952.20 4229.77
Crime Analyst 75 1 35.00 2800.00 6066.67
2 36.75 2940.00 6370.00
3 38.59 3087.00 6688.50
4 40.52 3241.35 7022.93
5 42.54 3403.42 7374.07
6 44.67 3573.59 7742.77
DAR Dispatcher - On Call 15 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.68 1334.40 2891.20
Updated January 10, 2023
108
18 February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Equipment Operator 24 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 16.37 1309.60 2837.47
6 17.19 1375.08 2979.34
Finance Director (Part Time) 82 1 46.20 3696.00 8008.00 2 48.51 3880.80 8408.40
3 50.94 4074.84 8828.82
4 53.48 4278.58 9270.26
5 56.16 4492.51 9733.77
6 58.96 4717.14 10220.46
General Service Wkr (Temp) 14 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.30 1304.00 2825.33
Golf Attendent 14 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.30 1304.00 2825.33
GSW/Kennel Worker 14 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.00 1280.00 2773.33
Groundskeeper (Temp) 12 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.00 1280.00 2773.33
Updated January 10, 2023
109
19 February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Deputy City Clerk 52 1 19.12 1529.60 3314.11
2 20.08 1606.08 3479.82
3 21.08 1686.38 3653.81
4 22.13 1770.70 3836.50
5 23.24 1859.24 4028.32
6 24.40 1952.20 4229.74
Imaging Technician 10 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.00 1280.00 2773.33
Lifeguard 15 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.00 1280.00 2773.33
Lifeguard/Instructor 17 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 18.00 1440.00 3120.00
Part Time Firefighter 73 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 16.22 1816.64 2811.47
4 17.03 1907.47 2952.04
5 17.88 2002.85 3099.64
6 18.78 2102.99 3254.62
P/D Administrative Aide (P/T) 70 1 20.00 1600.00 3466.67 2 21.00 1680.00 3640.00
3 22.05 1764.00 3822.00
4 23.15 1852.20 4013.10
5 24.31 1944.81 4213.76
6 25.53 2042.05 4424.45
Updated January 10, 2023
110
20 February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Police Cadet 10 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.00 1280.00 2773.33
Police Clerk/Dispatcher 20 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 16.51 1320.80 2861.73
5 17.34 1386.84 3004.82
6 18.20 1456.18 3155.06
General Service Worker/ Park Aide 10 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.00 1280.00 2773.33
OHV Clerk Typist 19 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 16.61 1328.80 2879.07
3 17.44 1395.24 3023.02
4 18.31 1465.00 3174.17
5 19.23 1538.25 3332.88
6 20.19 1615.16 3499.52
Police Sergeant 75 1 38.51 3080.80 6675.07
2 40.44 3234.84 7008.82
3 42.46 3396.58 7359.26
4 44.58 3566.41 7727.22
5 46.81 3744.73 8113.59
6 49.15 3931.97 8519.26
Pool Supervisor 29 1 17.10 1368.00 2964.00
2 17.96 1436.40 3112.20
3 18.85 1508.22 3267.81
4 19.80 1583.63 3431.20
5 20.79 1662.81 3602.76
6 21.82 1745.95 3782.90
Updated January 10, 2023
111
21 February 28, 2023
City of California City
Salary Schedule
2022-2023
Title Range Step Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
PT Maintenance Worker I 23 1 17.47 1397.60 3028.13
2 18.34 1467.48 3179.54
3 19.26 1540.85 3338.52
4 20.22 1617.90 3505.44
5 21.23 1698.79 3680.71
6 22.30 1783.73 3864.75
Recreation Aide/Cashier 5 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.00 1280.00 2773.33
Senior Lifeguard 17 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 16.29 1303.20 2823.60
Updated January 10, 2023
112
22 February 28, 2023
ITEM NO. NB 2.

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
February 28, 2023
Prepared By: Kari Lee, Public Works Admin

Subject: New City-Wide Phone System

BACKGROUND: All City buildings currently utilize outdated phones on standard, copper phone lines with multiple phone companies. The current phone system in place is outdated and inefficient. The phones, any technical support and parts for them are no longer available as well as the copper phone lines they operate on are aging and becoming unreliable as witnessed by several phone outages within the past year including the one just last week.

Staff has been working with Judy Magana from Global Communications 2000 (GC 2000) for a new, cohesive, city-wide phone system that will help bring every City building into the 21st century for less money than what we are currently paying, under one phone bill.

GC 2000 has been in the business of filling the technology needs of their clients in finding the best communication solutions while providing optimal customer service at a much better price for over 25 years. GC 2000 earns their money through the companies they partner with to bring these great, reliable services to their customers at affordable prices.

GC 2000 has completed their exhaustive review of phone bills and site visits and have advised staff of their findings.
• The phones we are using are outdated and do not help staff operate efficiently. • Staff can only dial extensions or transfer calls internally to the building they are in. Any calls made to other buildings (i.e.; city hall to PD), the full number has to be dialed or given to callers for them to call. Which can understandably, exasperate the caller. • The standard, copper telephone lines currently in use are quickly losing their value for the phone companies to maintain. This fact translates to costlier bills in the future at the prices the phone companies determine.
• Multiple phone bills which create a time-consuming task of breaking down the bills every month so they can be charged to the correct departments. • The City is spending more money than necessary due to a few factors (multiple phone companies creating repetitive fees and taxes, unused, active lines, taxes and fees charged per department, etc.).

GC 2000 has spent a great deal of time and effort on this project to ensure that the City gets the needed services, phones, better phone line quality and dependable service through the cloud with one carrier which will result in one, easy to read, monthly phone bill broken down by department saving the City both time and money.

They have matched us with Airespring who will be providing the new phones and the digital service through the cloud as well as any software updates throughout the term of the contract.

These improved phones and services are provided without any extra costs (installation, maintenance, ongoing support etc.) or any “hidden fees” to the City. Additionally, Airespring & GC 2000 will be providing local customer service and support as well as unlimited staff training, at any time, over the entire contract term as part of the package. 113 February 28, 2023
The current annual cost for our existing outdated phones and services is $58,760.88.

Airespring is offering a 3-year contract with an annual cost of $42,558.00, SAVING the City $16,202.88 Annually.

Please keep in mind, costs will only continue to increase at an unknown rate with our current providers. The rise in costs will be completely up to them as they see fit.

With Airesping, the cost will remain the same throughout the 3-year contract term for better services and products now and moving forward.

This upgrade reflects a step forward towards fiscal responsibility to our citizens and their tax dollars. This is accomplished by the following:

1. Fiscally Responsible – One phone company, less surcharges and taxes. Better tracking of phone lines to avoid paying for lines we aren’t using. No repetitive fees and taxes.

2. Efficiency - One, easier to read billing already separated by the departments. This means less time spent by accounting to reconcile the multiple phone bills for the different departments.

3. Known, constant costs which will assist departments in budgeting.

4. Less Expensive – Airespring charges less, for better services and phones than we are currently spending.

This technological improvement may seem small but first impressions are everything. The City will not only be providing better services for our community but also show potential businesses that we are a City moving forward and worth investing in.

RECOMMENDATION: City Council to authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Airespring.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Airespring Proposal / Cost Comparison

2. Nextlevel Proposal / Cost Comparison

3. Momentum Proposal / Cost Comparison
FISCAL IMPACT:

NO construction, installation, equipment, training or extended customer service costs to the City, in the beginning or throughout the term.

Current monthly cost for the City is $4,896.74 for the current providers and services (which are most likely to continue to increase).

The new monthly cost with Airespring will be $3,546.50.00.

This provides a savings of $1,350.24 a month for better phones and services.

ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION: N/A
114 February 28, 2023

CALIFORNIA CITY
21000 Hacienda Blvd.

California City, Ca 93505
2/19/2023
Proposal for

CALIFORNIA CITY
Current Providers: VERIZON / FRONTIER / G SOLUTIONS Current Charges VERIZON ** CITY HALL: $ 854.56
** FIRE DEPARTMENT: $ 88.26
** POLICE DISPATCH VERIZON Long Distance $ 53.45
** PUBLIC WORKS $ 116.55
Total current VERIZON charges: $ 1,112.82
FRONTIER ** AIRPORT: $ 401.70
** CITY HALL: $ 180.72
** FIRE DEPARTMENT: $ 496.77
** GOLF COURSE: $ 296.51
** PARKS AND RECREATION $ 354.83
** POLICE DEPARTMENT & ANIMAL CONTROL $ 937.27
** PUBLIC WORKS $ 394.84
** WWTP: $ 182.33
Total current FRONTIER charges: $ 3,244.97
G SOLUTIONS ** G SOLUTIONS (Maintenance Contract for Phones) : $ 538.95 Total current VERIZON/FRONTIER/G SOLUTIONS charges: $ 4,896.74 Proposed Provider: AIRESPRING Proposed Charges
Departments/Locations Services
Airport: ** 2 VoIP phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line (POTs replacement): $ 166.00 22636 Airport Way ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 1,684.00 FREE City Hall: ** 22 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line (POTS replacement): $ 707.00 21000 Hacienda Blvd. ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 3,814.00 FREE Fire Dept: ** 18 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line (POTs replacement): $ 668.00 20890 Hacienda Blvd. ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 3,789.00 FREE Golf Course: 10300 N. Loop Blvd. ** 1 VoIP Phone / SD WAN / 1 Alarjm line (POTs replacement): $ 145.00 10300 N. Loop Blvd. ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 1,684.00 FREE OHV: 7800 Moss Ave. Building A ** 2 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / Conference Phone: $ 149.50 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 1,684.00 FREE Parks & Rec Dept: Various ** 4 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 3 Alarm lines (POTS replacement): $ 521.00 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 1,866.00 FREE Police Dept: 21130 Hacienda Blvd. ** 23 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line (POTs replacement): $ 790.00 Includes Animal Control ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 3,814.00 FREE Public Works: 7800 Moss Ave. ** 8 VoIP Phones / SD WAN: $ 234.00 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 2,488.00 FREE WWTP: 10835 Nelson Dr. ** 2 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarjm line (POTs replacement): $ 166.00 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 1,984.00 FREE Total proposed AIRESPRING charges: $ 3,546.50
Total Equipment, set up and installation costs $ 22,807.00 FREE Monthly: $ 1,350.24
Yearly: $ 16,202.88
Term (3 year): $ 48,608.64
SAVINGS:
115 February 28, 2023

1. One phone bill instead of multipe bills - Phone bill can be customized per department. Easier for accounting

2. Total equipment, set up, and installation costs are FREE

3. There is a tremendous cost savings every single month.

4. All sites are networked together.

5. No maintenance or hardware costs.

6. All sites will be professionally installed at no cost.

7. On going training available at no cost.

8. Easy to transfer calls throughout your locations.

9. No worries about copper lines failing, dropoped calls, and poor quality.

10. 24/7 customer service with call center in U.S.

11. Dedicated account representative assigned to your account.

12. Local representative to assist, 45 minutes away (Global Conmmunications 2000)

13. Upgrading phone system with up to date technology and phones will always be upgraded at no cost.

14. Please allow 30-60 days to provision order.

SUMMARY:
116 February 28, 2023
revised: 2/19/2023

CALIFORNIA CITY
21000 Hacienda Blvd.

California City, Ca 93505
Proposal for

CALIFORNIA CITY
Current Providers: VERIZON / FRONTIER / G SOLUTIONS Current Charges VERIZON ** CITY HALL: $ 854.56
** FIRE DEPARTMENT: $ 88.26
** POLICE DISPATCH VERIZON Long Distance $ 53.45
** PUBLIC WORKS $ 116.55
Total current VERIZON charges: $ 1,112.82
FRONTIER ** AIRPORT: $ 401.70
** CITY HALL: $ 180.72
** FIRE DEPARTMENT: $ 496.77
** GOLF COURSE: $ 296.51
** PARKS AND RECREATION $ 354.83
** POLICE DEPARTMENT & ANIMAL CONTROL $ 937.27
** PUBLIC WORKS $ 394.84
** WWTP: $ 182.33
Total current FRONTIER charges: $ 3,244.97
G SOLUTIONS ** G SOLUTIONS (Maintenance Contract for Phones) : $ 538.95 Total current VERIZON/FRONTIER/G SOLUTIONS charges: $ 4,896.74 Proposed Provider: NEXTLEVEL
Services
City Hall: 21000 Hacienda Blvd. ** 22 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line (POTS replacement): $ 972.90 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ - FREE
Airport: 22636 Airport Way ** 2 VoIP phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line (POTs replacement): $ 253.90 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ - FREE
Fire Dept: 20890 Hacienda Blvd. ** 18 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line (POTs replacement): $ 865.10 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ - FREE
Senior Clubhouse: 10221 Heather Ave. ** 1 VoIP Phone / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line (POTS replacement): $ 226.95 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ - FREE
Police Dept: 21130 Hacienda Blvd. ** 20 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line (POTs replacement): $ 919.00 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ - FREE
Strata Center: 10350 Heather Ave. ** 1 VoIP Phone / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line (POTs replacement): $ 226.95 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ - FREE
WWTP: 10835 Nelson Dr. ** 3 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarjm line (POTs replacement): $ 280.85 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ - FREE
Public Works: 7800 Moss Ave. ** 8 VoIP Phones / SD WAN: $ 500.60 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ - FREE
Animal Control: 5000 Lindbergh Blvd. ** 3 VoIP Phones / SD WAN: $ 195.85 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ - FREE
Golf Course: 10300 N. Loop Blvd. ** 1 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line (POTs replacement):: $ 168.90 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ - FREE
OHV: 7800 Moss Ave. Building A ** 2 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 1 Conference Phone: $ 168.90 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ - FREE
Total proposed NEXTLEVEL charges: $ 4,779.90
Total Equipment, set up and installation costs $ 17,098.50 FREE 117 February 28, 2023
SAVINGS:

Monthly: $ 116.84
Yearly: $ 1,402.08
Term (3 year): $ 4,206.24
SUMMARY:

1. One phone bill instead of multipe bills - Phone bill can be customized per department. Very easy to read, easy for for payroll.

2. Total equipment, set up, and installation costs are free.

3. There is a $437/month savings.

4. All sites are networked together.

5. No maintenance or hardware costs.

6. All sites will be professionally installed at no cost.

7. On going training available at no costs.

8. Easy to transfer calls throughout your locations.

9. No worries about copper lines failing, dropoped calls, and poor quality.

10. 24/7 customer service with call centrre in U.S.

11. Dedicated account representative assigned to your account.

12. Local representative to assist, 45 minutes away (Global Conmmunications 2000)

13. Upgrading phone system with up to date technology and phones will always be upgraded at no cost.

14. Please allow 30-60 days to provision order.
118 February 28, 2023

CALIFORNIA CITY
21000 Hacienda Blvd.

California City, Ca 93505
2/19/2023
Proposal for

CALIFORNIA CITY
Current Providers: VERIZON / FRONTIER / G SOLUTIONS Current Charges VERIZON ** CITY HALL: $ 854.56
** FIRE DEPARTMENT: $ 88.26
** POLICE DISPATCH VERIZON Long Distance $ 53.45
** PUBLIC WORKS $ 116.55
Total current VERIZON charges: $ 1,112.82
FRONTIER ** AIRPORT: $ 401.70
** CITY HALL: $ 180.72
** FIRE DEPARTMENT: $ 496.77
** GOLF COURSE: $ 296.51
** PARKS AND RECREATION $ 354.83
** POLICE DEPARTMENT & ANIMAL CONTROL $ 937.27
** PUBLIC WORKS $ 394.84
** WWTP: $ 182.33
Total current FRONTIER charges: $ 3,244.97
G SOLUTIONS ** G SOLUTIONS (Maintenance Contract for Phones) : $ 538.95 Total current VERIZON/FRONTIER/G SOLUTIONS charges: $ 4,896.74 Proposed Provider: Momentum Proposed Charges
Departments/Locations Services
Airport: ** 1 VoIP phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line : $ 155.80 22636 Airport Way ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 1,289.96 City Hall: ** 22 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line : $ 1,103.58 21000 Hacienda Blvd. ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 1,289.96 Fire Dept: ** 18 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line : $ 690.94 20890 Hacienda Blvd. ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 1,289.96 Golf Course: 10300 N. Loop Blvd. ** 1 VoIP Phone: $ 56.14 10300 N. Loop Blvd. ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ - OHV: 7800 Moss Ave. Building A ** 2 VoIP Phones / SD WAN: $ 169.55 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs:

Parks & Rec Dept: Various ** 4 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 3 Alarm lines : $ 484.13 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 3,869.88 Police Dept: 21130 Hacienda Blvd. ** 23 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarm line : $ 870.02 Includes Animal Control ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 1,289.96 Public Works: 7800 Moss Ave. ** 8 VoIP Phones / SD WAN: $ 373.72 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ -
WWTP: 10835 Nelson Dr. ** 2 VoIP Phones / SD WAN / 1 Alarjm line : $ 189.07 ** Equipment, set up and installation costs: $ 1,289.96 Total proposed Momentum charges: $ 4,092.95
Total Equipment, set up and installation costs $ 10,319.68 Monthly: $ 803.79
Yearly: $ 9,645.48
Term (3 year): $ 28,936.44
SAVINGS:
119 February 28, 2023

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
February 28th, 2023
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Amador Meza, Chief Water Operator
SUBJECT: Security Surveillance Camera System
ITEM NO. NB 3.

BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION: Public Works (PW) is requesting to purchase a security surveillance camera system for the maintenance yard.

In the past year alone the City PW Maintenance Yard has experienced several break ins.

These unfortunate events have incurred over $20,000 of replacement and repair costs of equipment, tools, vehicle parts as well as vehicles and property damage done during every break in. Additional costs incurred, not included in the above total, is the administrative time to investigate and list the items/property stolen and damaged, their value and the research of the replacement/repair costs of said items and damaged property.

The current camera system is woefully inadequate and only records. It is not a security system. Staff strongly feels that if an adequate security surveillance camera system was in place, the continual events throughout this past year may have been prevented.

To help protect our current and new vehicles, equipment, assets and most of all our employees, staff would like to purchase a better, security surveillance system to help prevent future events.

The initial cost of the new system will be offset by no monthly charges being incurred as this is a self-monitoring, notification system.

Additionally, the protection and security it will provide for the City's assets and employees will be immeasurable.
120 February 28, 2023
FISCAL IMPACT: $14,869.40
G/L Breakdown

1. Current Balance Streets # 27-4411-630 $ 4,500.00
Amount Requested $ 21973.88
Amount Remaining $ 1,526.12

2. Current Balance Water # 51-5115-630 $35,000.00
Amount Requested $ 21973.88
Amount Remaining $32,026.12

3. Current Balance Garage #10-4441-630 $ 23,000.00
Amount Requested $ 21973.88
Amount Remaining $ 20,026.12

4. Current Balance Facilities #10-4161-630 $ 23,000.00
Amount Requested $ 21973.88
Amount Remaining $ 20,026.12

5. Current Balance PW Admin #10-5117-630 $ 3,000.00
Amount Requested $ 21973.89
Amount Remaining $ 26.11
RECOMMENDATION: PW staff is recommending the quoted ADT security system ( attached) over the other quotes received. This recommendation is due to the quality of the equipment and the technological advantages provided. One of the advantages is the ability to be notified of a possible intrusion as well as remote view/operate the system on a mobile device. Upon detecting an intrusion, the system can notify any intruders by broadcasting a customized message as well as triggering the included red & blue strobe lights. The system will also "push" all notifications to multiple recipients (PD included).

Additionally, since the equipment will be purchased up front, there will not be any monthly monitoring fees.

ATTACHMENTS:
1 . ADT Proposal

2. Applied Technology Group, Inc.

3. Vivint

4. CCTV Security Pros
121 February 28, 2023
122 February 28, 2023
123 February 28, 2023
124 February 28, 2023
125 February 28, 2023
126 February 28, 2023
127 February 28, 2023
128 February 28, 2023
129 February 28, 2023
130 February 28, 2023
131 February 28, 2023
132 February 28, 2023
133 February 28, 2023
134 February 28, 2023
135 February 28, 2023
136 February 28, 2023
137 February 28, 2023
138 February 28, 2023
139 February 28, 2023
140 February 28, 2023
141 February 28, 2023
142 February 28, 2023
143 February 28, 2023
144 February 28, 2023
145 February 28, 2023
146 February 28, 2023
147 February 28, 2023
148 February 28, 2023
149 February 28, 2023
150 February 28, 2023
ITEM NO. NB 4.

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
FEBRUARY 28, 2023
PREPARED BY: Paul Junker, Contract Planner
SUBJECT: Review of pending requests for general plan amendments and zoning amendments.

BACKGROUND:

The City has received numerous requests for general plan amendments and rezoning of properties, most involving change from O/RA designations to Light Industrial to accommodate new cannabis uses.

General Plan designations represent the highest level direction for allowed land uses and approval of a general plan amendment (GPA) is entirely at the City’s discretion. General Plan amendments result in a fundamental change to the allowed by right and conditionally allowed uses of a property and therefore a GPA must be analyzed subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Given that there is no certainty an applicant’s request for a GPA will be approved, and further given the effort and expense to complete the required CEQA analysis, staff presented a collection of proposed GPAs to the Planning Commission on February 7, 2023 and is now presenting these projects to the City Council so that staff and applicants can better understand the priorities of decisionmakers. It is assumed that if the City Council’s review is generally favorable, then applicants will undertake the efforts to provide complete applications and the requested GPAs would come forward for formal review and decision.

This review is a policy level discussion and will not directly result in the approval of any of the requested GPAs. The Planning Commission reviewed these projects and the Commission’s input is provided as guidance to the City Council. Any GPAs would ultimately require City Council approval.
151 February 28, 2023
While the General Plan represents the most senior land use designation, these projects would also require amendments to zoning. If these projects move forward, then the requests would be for both a GPA and an amendment of zoning designation (Rezone).

OVERVIEW OF REQUESTS:

The City Council will be reviewing six specific projects that extend across much of California City. Five of the projects are very similar: an applicant seeking to convert O/RA lands to Light Industrial in order to allow a commercial cannabis business to be constructed and operated. The sixth request involves the ability to construct multi family housing on land that is designated Commercial Office. The six sites under review are identified in the below Figure.
152 February 28, 2023
ANALYSIS OF SITES:

Sites 1, 2 and 3:

Sites 1, 2 and 3 share a similar setting, being located south of and with frontage on California City Boulevard. Each of these sites are currently have General Plan and zoning designations of O/RA and the applicant’s for each property are seeking Light Industrial General Plan and zoning designations.

These sites range from 10.49 acres to 39.78 acres in size – each being of adequate size to accommodate a substantial commercial cannabis business. These properties are located between 2.5 and 3.5 miles west of existing development in the core area of California City. Due to frontage to California City Boulevard, these sites are prominent to travelers coming to and leaving California City.

Based on the overall General Plan and zoning designations of the City, it appears industrial development was intended to be located north of California City Boulevard.

However, two properties south of the Boulevard have already been converted to Light Industrial to accommodate cannabis businesses. Approving additional Light Industrial uses south of California City Boulevard would demonstrate the City’s support for such development and it would likely result in additional GPA/Rezone requests.

City services (municipal water and wastewater) and electric services are not currently available at these properties and solutions such as wells, septic fields and onsite generators would likely be required to support development of these properties. 153 February 28, 2023
Site 4:

Site 4 is located directly north of the California City Municipal Airport and approximately one-third of a mile west of Yerba Road. The nearest residents are approximately 1.1 miles to the south on the opposite side of the Airport. Existing Light Industrial lands are located immediately south of this site and properties around this site are designated O/RA.

Municipal water is located approximately 100 feet from the site and wastewater service is located 4,000 feet from the property. Based on City regulations, this site would connect to City water and would rely on onsite septic for wastewater.

Site 5:
154 February 28, 2023
Site 5 is located approximately three mile northeast of California City’s core area. At 80 acres, this site is the largest proposed GPA/Rezone under review. Municipal water is located approximately 500 feet from the site and wastewater service is located 600 feet from the property. Given the size of this project it would be reasonable to require connection to water and wastewater services.

Unlike other properties under review, this site is not proximate to other Light Industrial properties. The closest land designated for Light Industrial use is approximately one-half mile to the west.

Site 6:

Site 6 is unlike the other sites currently under review. The site is designated for Commercial Office uses but the property owner would like to develop this site as multi-family housing.

The site is proximate to municipal water and wastewater and would connect to these services.

There are two approaches the City may consider if multi-family housing at this location is supported. The first option is to amend the GP and zoning designations to higher density residential. This would be a departure from the Commercial Office designations that extend along this section of California City Boulevard.

A second option the City might wish to consider is to amend the Zoning Code to add multi-family housing as a conditionally allowed use. This would allow applicants to propose projects that the City could then review for consistency with established standards.

It is noteworthy that single family homes have been constructed on California City Boulevard immediately west of this site. Further, it appears most of the development in the Commercial Office corridor that extends from City Hall to North Loop/South Loop is residential in character.
155 February 28, 2023
ANALYSIS/BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION:

The City Council is requested to provide guidance on whether it generally views the proposed use amendments favorably. No formal action is requested and if such application proceed, staff will complete a more thorough analysis of each proposed site.

Staff offers the following guidance for the Council’s consideration:

General Considerations:
• Generally, additional lands are zoned to a given designation when there is a shortage of available properties for a given use. Currently, there is a substantial inventory of vacant industrial lands in California City. • Land use patterns should be viewed from a relatively broad perspective. Approval of a use amendments may result in additional requests for such amendments, leading to broader transitions in land use patterns over time. • Five of six rezones under review are intended to allow new cannabis businesses.

Such businesses would likely have a positive economic impact on the City. • Property owners seeking rezones are more likely to pursue development – they are making an investment which signals a desire to proceed with projects. • Spot zoning, or the designation of a small area to uses inconsistent with surrounding uses is both a poor practice and not supported by established court decisions. • Availability of public facilities (water and wastewater) is an important factor in considering development proposals. Connection to such services in environmentally preferable.

Sites 1, 2 and 3:
• Industrial uses tend not to be compatible with residential uses. If O/RA lands are converted to Industrial, it is not likely residential uses would be compatible in the future.
• California City Boulevard is the most important thoroughfare in the community and the appearance and character of development along this corridor will influence the appearance and character of the community.
• Public facilities (water and wastewater) are not available at these sites and projects would be required to construct onsite facilities (wells and septic). • These sites are immediately south of existing Light Industrial lands and three parcels south of California City Boulevard are already designated Light Industrial.

Therefore, amending the designations of these sites to Light Industrial would not represent spot zoning.

Site 4:
• This site is relatively removed from sensitive land uses and is not located on prominent roads.
• Water service is available at this site but wastewater would require an onsite disposal system.
• Land immediately south of this site is designated Light Industrial, therefore amending the designations of these sites to Light Industrial would not represent spot zoning.
156 February 28, 2023
Site 5:
• Site 5 is the largest individual request submitted to the City. While removed from other Light Industrial lands, this site is of adequate size to support a diverse collection of commercial cannabis and non-cannabis light industrial uses. • The site is well removed from the City core and prevailing wind patterns would minimize the potential for cannabis odor issues.
• Water and wastewater facilities are located in proximity to the site. • While no Light Industrial land is located directly adjacent to this site, properties within one-half mile of this site are designated Light Industrial. Given the size of this site is 80 acres and would likely be subdivided prior to development, amending the use of this site to Light Industrial would not appear to be spot zoning.

Site 6:
• A significant portion of existing development near this site is residential and additional residential would appear to be compatible.
• To date, demand for Commercial Office uses in California City has been limited.

This may change in the future and the City should ensure there is an adequate amount of high-visibility commercial land available for development. • High quality multi-family housing can enhance the appearance of California City Boulevard while providing housing at relatively affordable costs. • If decisionmakers support residential in this area, then staff would recommend adjusting C-3 zone conditionally allowed uses to include multi-family residential, rather than rezoning this parcel to residential.

PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS AND INPUT
The Planning Commission considered the proposed rezones as a discussion item on February 7, 2023. During that meeting the following comments were received from the Commission and members of the public.

Public Comments
Sites 1, 2 and 3:
• Some concern noted over cannabis/industrial development along CCB.

Site 4:
• City may want to expand the airport in the future. New cannabis uses could limit use of land for non-cannabis commercial uses.

Site 6:
• Some support for allowing housing on CCB noted, but also that CCB should remain primarily commercial.

General Comments:
• Interest in seeing cannabis uses clustered together.
• Rezones should be based on need and limited availability of land. • Mixing of different uses in O-RA reduces potential for other projects in future years. 157 February 28, 2023
• Cannabis uses can consume infrastructure capacity that could otherwise go to non-cannabis development.
• Some general concerns over cannabis and compatibility with future uses.

Commission Comments
Sites 1, 2 and 3:
• Expressed some concern over CCB becoming the “cannabis corridor.” • June 2020 – PC decided no more zoning changes on CCB for cannabis. • A past decision is not the sole basis for future decisions - consider what is good for the City – all factors, including health, aesthetics.
• Comments of strong concern over proliferation of cannabis uses on CCB. • If we do development is highly visible area, can the development be accomplished in ways that propose the open desert feel, good screening of buildings.
• Referenced “cannabis corridor” in a negative context. Consistent theme throughout the commissioners.

Site 4:
• Would like to understand future airport expansions to make sure this site does not constrain future expansions.

Site 6:
• General support for Site 6, particularly interested in senior housing. • Have not seen any new office constructed in City in years, and so open to multifamily housing on California City Boulevard. • Supportive of multi-family to address shortage of housing and affordable housing.

General Comments:
• Lack of effective code enforcement was a significant concern. Generally, if the City continues to approval cannabis uses then code enforcement must be more effective.
• Several comments related specifically to cannabis odors. • Key factors in considering whether to rezone land:
o Availability of properly zoned land is a significant factor. o Water availability is an important factor in considering rezones. o Concern over the broad patchwork of development that rezones can promote.
• Would consider projects on a case-by-case basis, but applicants should provide compelling reasons to support the land use amendments.
• Balance community values of aesthetics, community health, long term vision with the opportunity presented by the cannabis industry. Be judicious in how the City considers rezones and accommodating cannabis uses.
158 February 28, 2023
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

No formal action is proposed at this time and therefore no review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is required or appropriate at this time.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact from the discussion, but if general plan amendments are needed, there will be a cost for consultant time.

COUNCIL OPTIONS
Not discuss this item
Continue the item to another meeting.

RECOMMENDATION
Provide general direction to City staff and applicants on whether the proposed land use amendments in the interests of the community. Council comments could consider the proposed sites as a whole or could consider the merits of the individual proposals.

ATTACHMENTS
None
159 February 28, 2023
PROPOSED GPAs/REZONES

POLICY DISCUSSION
City of California City
City Council
February 28, 2023
160 February 28, 2023

REQUESTED GUIDANCE
City Council Comments On:
General support amending land uses
Review of specific land use proposals
Factors that would affect Commission
support of land use changes
2 161 February 28, 2023

BACKGROUND
City has received five formal applications for
rezones – all from ORA to M-1 to allow
cannabis uses.
These requests would also require General
Plan amendments.
These projects would be subject to review
under CEQA.
3 162 February 28, 2023

BACKGROUND
General Plan amendments(GPAs)/Rezones and the
associated CEQA analysis represent a significant
investment by an applicant.
GPAs and Rezones are entirely discretionary – the
City is under no obligation to approve.
GPAs and rezones are legislative actions and
represent the highest level of land use decision.
4 163 February 28, 2023

BACKGROUND
Planning Commission held a policy-level discussion of
land use amendments on February 7, 2023.
City Council comments will provide guidance to staff
and applicants on the general support for
amendments.
If general Council support is expressed, then applicants will prepare full and complete applications for City
review. 5
164 February 28, 2023
Sites with Pending GP Amendment/Rezone Requests
Site 2
Site 3
Site 1
Site 5
Site 4
Site 6
165 February 28, 2023
Site 2
California City Boulevard
Site 1
Site 3
166 February 28, 2023
Site 1
California City Boulevard
Parcel Size: 10.49Acres
Current GP: O/RA
Current Zoning: O/RA
Proposed GP: Light Industrial
Proposed Zoning: M-1
167 February 28, 2023
Site 2
California City Boulevard
Parcel Size: 39.78Acres
Current GP: O/RA
Current Zoning: O/RA
Proposed GP: Light Industrial
Proposed Zoning: M-1
168 February 28, 2023
Site 3
California City Boulevard
Parcel Size: 31.59Acres
Current GP: O/RA
Current Zoning: O/RA
Proposed GP: Light Industrial
Proposed Zoning: M-1
169 February 28, 2023
Site 4
Yerba Boulevard
Mendiburu Road
Parcel Size: 9.97Acres
Current GP: O/RA
Current Zoning: O/RA
Proposed GP: Light Industrial
Proposed Zoning: M-1
170 February 28, 2023
Site 5 Parcel Size: 80.51 Acres
Current GP: O/RA
Current Zoning: O/RA
Proposed GP: Light Industrial
Proposed Zoning: M-1
171 February 28, 2023
Site 6
California City Boulevard
Parcel Size: 0.69Acres
Current GP: Comm./Office
Current Zoning: C3 Comm. Office
Proposed GP: TBD
Proposed Zoning: TBD
172 February 28, 2023
POLICY CONSIDERATIONS – GENERAL
Is there a shortage of land available for industrial
uses? Would the GPA’s/Rezones facilitate investment
and economic development?
Would the GPAs/Rezones have the potential to result
in incompatible land uses?
Is there concern for dispersed development?
Willingness to approved rezones can result in
development spread more widely in the City. 14
173 February 28, 2023
POLICY CONSIDERATION – SITES 1, 2 AND 3
California City Boulevard is a primary community
roadway and key entry to the City. Would industrial
development fit in this locations?
Municipal water and wastewater services are not
available. Is this a key factor for cannabis uses?
Two cannabis businesses have been approved south
of CCB. Should this trend continue?
15 174 February 28, 2023
POLICY CONSIDERATIONS – SITE 4
This site is generally removed from sensitive uses and would not appear to have potential use conflicts.
Municipal water service is available at the site but
wastewater is not available.
.
16 175 February 28, 2023
POLICY CONSIDERATIONS – SITE 5
At 80 acres, by far the largest site under consideration. Removed from core City area and major roadways and
so would have minimal negative impacts.
Project could connect to existing water and
wastewater service lines.
Not contiguous to other Light Industrial, but other sites on Twenty Mule Team have been designated Industrial.
17 176 February 28, 2023
POLICY CONSIDERATION – SITE 6
California City Boulevard is zoned primarily for
commercial and office uses.
Limited office commercial development has
occurred on CCB.
High quality high-density housing could enhance the
appearance of California City Boulevard.
If supportive of housing, staff suggests making multifamily development conditionally allowed in C-3. 18 177 February 28, 2023

PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
Concern over additional cannabis uses on California City Boulevard (sites 1, 2 and 3).
Some concerns over future expansion of the Airport (site 4). General concern over level of code enforcement and
code violations related to cannabis uses.
Some concern over proliferation of cannabis uses
broadly in the community.
General support for accommodating housing on
California City Boulevard in the City core (site 6). 19 178 February 28, 2023

RECOMMENDED ACTION
This is a policy discussion and no final actions are being contemplated.

Council comments will provide staff and applicants a
better understanding of City priorities.

If comments are supportive, then applicants will likely proceed with formal applications.
20 179 February 28, 2023

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff requests the Council:
Accept public comments and discuss the item.
Identify any questions/additional information the
Council will require to render a decision.
Provide comments and identify criteria and factors
most important to the City Council.
21 180 February 28, 2023
ITEM NO. NB 5.

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
FEBRUARY 28, 2023
PREPARED BY: Mayor Kulikoff
SUBJECT: ARPA Funds

BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION
During the February 14, 2023 City Council meeting, Mayor Kulikoff requested this item on the February 28, 2023 City Council meeting agenda. After conducting a Townhall meeting on February 23, 2023 at 5:30PM and listening to public comments, it came to my attention that the central theme the majority of the public found concerning was city image and recreational activities. Below are my recommendations and cost allocations of ARPA funds for each project.

Skatepark
Cost: $600,000 for an approximate 10,000 sqft area.

The youth of California City needs us to stand up for them and help grow activities available in the area. A skatepark can help push us a step further in the right direction. In my opinion, this should be located between Hamburger Hill and the city pool. This is near the playground equipment and will provide a centrally located area for parents while preventing a lot of vandalism compared to being on Par 3.

Golf Course Clubhouse
Cost: $600,000 for completion of Clubhouse.

The Golf Course Clubhouse was already started years ago. Completing this project will help boost our city image and recreational services offered in our community. This project broke ground years ago and then funding was pulled. A lot of the work being performed will be from volunteers. We are a community of volunteers and as a City Council we should help by providing what we can to get us back on track. 181 February 28, 2023
California City Blvd Revitalization
Cost: Remaining ARPA funds allocated for this project.

Revitalizing California City Blvd between Hacienda Blvd and the bridge will positively impact our city image. This area of roughly a 0.4 mile stretch is home to many retail businesses as well as City Hall and a library. Developing this area similar to The Blvd in Lancaster can have social and economic benefits. Connecting people to the history of California City can be accomplished through plaques on walking paths. Benches can be strategically placed for community relaxation and interaction. Many design elements that improve the surrounding area can be an economic multiplier that brings greater opportunities to our city through a vision of progress. We have an ability as a community to put ourselves on a path of success that can benefit the next 50 years of California City and bring us one step closer to realizing the dream of what our city can accomplish.

FISCAL IMPACT
Minimal fiscal impact for discussion. Cost of approximately $2.596 million allocated from the remaining ARPA funds. Recreational and revitalization projects stated above will have a positive economic impact on the future of California City.

COUNCIL OPTIONS
Motion to approve the recommendations as stated.

Other City Council direction.

RECOMMENDATION
City Council to approve ARPA funds of $600,000 for completion of the Golf Course Clubhouse, $600,000 for a Skatepark at Central Park between Hamburger Hill and the city pool, and the remaining ARPA funds allocated for the revitalization of California City Blvd between Hacienda Blvd and the bridge.

ATTACHMENTS
NONE.
182 February 28, 2023
ITEM NO. NB 6.

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
FEBRUARY 28, 2023
PREPARED BY: Mayor Kulikoff

SUBJECT: Consultant Impediments and the Need to Move In-House

BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION
During the February 14, 2023 City Council meeting, Mayor Kulikoff requested this item on the February 28, 2023 City Council meeting agenda.

California City has tied up too many resources with consultants when we should be providing services in-house. Cost of service increases exponentially when hiring consultants long-term. A consultant is meant to bridge the gap in city services in order to keep business flowing smoothly. When we tie ourselves up with consultants for every problem, we lose track of the solution and only create more impediments.

FISCAL IMPACT
Minimal fiscal impact for discussion. Positive fiscal impact to move city services in-house.

COUNCIL OPTIONS
As per City Council direction.

RECOMMENDATION
Discuss and give City Manager direction as determined by City Council.

ATTACHMENTS
NONE.
183 February 28, 2023

← All documents from this meeting