Agenda packet — California City City Council, April 11, 2023 (part 1 of 2)

Kelly Kulikoff
Mayor
Ronald Smith
Mayor Pro Tem
Jim Creighton
Councilmember
Karen Macedonio
Councilmember
Michael Kulikoff
Councilmember AGENDA

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY

CITY COUNCIL/ HOUSING AUTHORITY/ SUCCESSOR AGENCY

REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY APRIL 11, 2023
CLOSED SESSION @ 3:00PM
REGULAR MEETING @ 6:00PM

COUNCIL CHAMBERS & VIA ZOOM
21000 HACIENDA BLVD., CALIFORNIA CITY, CA 93505
If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, contact the Deputy City Clerk at (760) 373-7140 or via email at [email protected]. We request a 24-hour notification prior to the meeting in order for the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 American Disabilities Act Title II)
Zoom instructions and notes:

1.Web Link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83837893766

2.Meeting ID: 838 3789 3766

3.Public can dial into the Zoom line:
a.One tap mobile: +16694449171,,87475859247# US
b.Dial the following number: +1 564 217 2000 US

4.Comments
a.Public must join Zoom meeting to comment
b.Keep your mic on Mute until you are requested to speak c.Use the “Raise your Hand” button to request to speak or, d.Send a chat request to City Clerk for request to speak e.When requested to speak state your name for the record f. Re-mute when your time to speak has ended
Public is urged to listen to the meeting in a quiet place, to avoid background noise. We also request public to MUTE your audio device when not commenting to avoid disruption during meeting. ** At this time, please take a moment to turn off your cell phones ** CLOSED SESSION @ 3:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL
Councilmembers: Kulikoff, Creighton, Macedonio, Mayor Pro Tem Smith, Mayor Kulikoff

ADOPT AGENDA

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Members of the public are welcome to address the City Council only on those items the Closed Session agenda. Each member of the public will be given (3) three minutes to speak.

CLOSED SESSION
CS 1. Conference with Legal Counsel-Existing Litigation Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: 13 Matters Zheng et al v. City of California Case No. BCV-22-103396 Sunton, LLC et al v. City of California et al Case No. BCV-22-103394 Zheng et al v. City of California City; Dr. Jim Hart et al. Case No. BCV-22-103326 Boston et al v California City Case No. BCV-22-101398
Pardue v. City of California City et al. Case No. BCV-22-101249 Craig v. City of California City Case No. BCV-22-100976 Stump v. Lessenevitch et al Case No. BCV-21-102947
Brothers, Jr, An Individual v. City of California City Case No. BCV-21-102349 Guillen v. City of California City Case No. BCV-21-100182 Melissa Gomez, et al. Gracelyn Escamilla v. Sharon Hom and City of Cal City Case No.

BCV-21-100050
City of California City v. SMY Land Case No. S1500CV254664 California Redevelopment v. Hoffman Case No. S1500CV250615 City of California City v. SMY Land, LLC Case No. S1500CV251121 CS 2. Conference with Legal Counsel – Potential exposure to litigations Paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 and subdivision (a) of Section 54956.95 CS 3. Conference with Labor Negotiator with the following bargaining units:

Fire Department Unit & Police Department Unit - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
City Negotiator: Inge Elmes, Acting City Manager
CS 4. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9, subdivision (d)(4) – In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, Case No. 1:17-MD-02804
CS 5. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Government Code section 54956.9(a), (d)(1)) - Daverin v. City of California City (Kern County Superior Court Case No. BCV-21-100689) Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release (Government Code section 54957(b)(1))

REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
REGULAR MEETING @ 6:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION

ROLL CALL
Councilmembers: Kulikoff, Creighton, Macedonio, Mayor Pro Tem Smith, Mayor Kulikoff

CITY CLERK REPORTS/LATE COMMINICATIONS
• Correspondence from J.M. Powers dated March 31, 2023, April 1, 2023, and April 2, 2023, J.M.

Powers has requested that they be part of the official meeting records.

DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
• Human Resource
• OHV
• Park and Recreation
• Planning
• Treasurer

CIVIC/COMMUNITY/ORGANIZATION ANNOUNCEMENTS

PUBLIC BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR
This portion of the meeting is reserved for the public to address the City Council on any matter not on the agenda and over which the City Council has jurisdiction. Comments are to be limited to three (3) minutes.

The City Council will receive the comments but cannot engage in back-and-forth discussion with the public or make any decision. The City Council can direct staff to bring the item back to a future agenda for discussion.

PRESENTATION

CONSENT CALENDAR

WAIVER OF FULL READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Consideration to waive full text reading of all Resolutions and Ordinances by single motion made at the start of each meeting, subject to the ability of the City Council / Agency to read the full text of selected resolutions and ordinances when the item is addressed by subsequent motion.

All items on the consent calendar are considered routine, non-controversial and will be approved by (1) one motion if no member of the council, staff, or public wishes to comment or ask questions. Public comments to be limited to (3) three minutes. Roll call vote required.

CC 1. Approve City Check Register dated 03/24/2023 through 04/06/2023 – by Finance Manager, Kenny Cooper
CC 2. Approval of Professional Services Agreement for Project Development Services Between Arrow Engineering Services Inc. (AESI) and the City of California City– by Acting City Manager, Inge Elmes
CC 3. Approval of Distribution Operator II Positions for Water Department – by Chief Water Operator, Amo Meza
CC 4. Approve Trucks for Water & Wastewater Treatment Plant - by Chief Water Operator, Amo Meza
CC 5. Adopt Resolution No. 03-23-2972 Authorizing Participation in the National Opioid Settlements arising out of In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, Case No. 1:17-MD-02804 – by Acting City Manager, Inge Elmes
CC 6. Authorize Agreement with Bakersfield Well and Pump for Annual Sampling Service – by WWTP Chief Operator, Richard Vasquez

CITY MANAGER REPORT

CONTINUED BUSINESS
CB 1. Quad Knopf, Inc. - Additional Funding Request – by Inge Elmes, Acting City Manager

Recommendation
Staff is recommending to approve the additional funding to complete the project and amend the contract.

CB 2. Professional Service Agreement with Interwest – by Inge Elmes, Acting City Manager

Recommendation
• Staff recommends the City Council approve a month-to-month contract starting July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023; and
• Staff is seeking direction from the City Council at this time and is open for discussion.

CB 3. Measure C and Measure A Financial Data – by Kenny Cooper, Finance Manager Recommendation
Discuss and give direction as needed.

NEW BUSINESS
NB 1. Miscellaneous Employee Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) – by Inge Elmes, City Manager

Recommendation
Staff recommends approving the agreement.

NB 2. Spending Approval for Desert Jade Apartments – by Serina Rodarte, HR Generalist Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council authorize Acting City Manager, to approve the $4,000 spending cap for the 11 vacant unit at Desert Jade.

COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS, AGENDA REQUESTS, AND AB1234 REPORTS This portion of the meeting is reserved for council members to present information, announcements, and items that have come to their attention. The Brown Act precludes Council, staff or public discussion. Short staff responses are appropriate. The Council will take no formal action. A Council member may request the City Clerk to calendar an item for consideration at a future meeting or refer an item to staff.

ADJOURNMENT
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING: This agenda was posted on all official City bulletin boards and the City website at least 72 hours prior to the Council Meeting. Socorro Chavez, City Clerk. 5 April 11, 2023
6 April 11, 2023
7 April 11, 2023
8 April 11, 2023
9 April 11, 2023
10 April 11, 2023
Department
Reports
11 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positons
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Airport Manager (Also PT
Bldg Inspector) Robert King 0.5 0.5 0 FT
Authorized Filled Open

0.5 0.5 0
Airport Total
Airport
12 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positons
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Administrative Secretary Susan Weber 1 1 0 FT
Building Inspector Tiffany Carter 1 1 0 FT
PT Building Inspector
(Also PT Airport Mgr) Robert King 0.5 0.5 0 FT
Authorized Filled Open

2.5 2.5 0
Building
Building Total
13 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Acting City Manager Inge Elmes 1 1 0 FT
Administrative Secretary Sonia Tapia 0.5 0.5 0 FT
Authorized Filled Open

1.5 1.5 0
City Manager
City Manager Total
14 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Range Status
City Clerk Socorro Chavez 1 1 0 49 FT
Authorized Filled Open
1 1 0
City Clerk
City Clerk Total
15 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Finance Manager Kenneth Cooper 1 1 0 FT
Payroll Generalist Megan O'Laughlin 1 1 0 FT
Account Clerk I Vanessa Pena 1 1 0 FT
Account Clerk III Destiny Parada 1 1 0 FT
Account Clerk III Beth Boone 1 1 0 FT
Account Clerk I Leandrea Weible 1 1 0 FT
Authorized Filled Open
6 6 0
Finance Total
Finance
16 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positons
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Fire Chief Jeremy Kosick 1 1 0 FT
Deputy Fire Marshall Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Administrative Assistant Dawn Ferguson 1 1 0 FT
3 2 1
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positons
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Fire Captain Usvaldo Guerrero 1 1 0 FT
Fire Captain Kyle Griffith 1 1 0 FT
Fire Captain David Orr 1 1 0 FT
3 3 0
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positons
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Fire Engineer Ryan Hanzel 1 1 0 FT
Fire Engineer Robert Marx 1 1 0 FT
Fire Engineer Adam Pretzer 1 1 0 FT
3 3 0
Fire Department
Public Safety Admin Total
Fire Captain Total
Fire Engineer Total
17 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positons
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Firefighter/Paramedic Blain Smith 1 1 0 FT
Firefighter/Paramedic Steven Keller 1 1 0 FT
Firefighter/Paramedic Gabriel Garcia 1 1 0 FT
Firefighter/Paramedic Zachary, Akin 1 1 0 FT
Firefighter/Paramedic Edgar Hernandez 1 1 0 FT
Firefighter/Paramedic Beau Budge 1 1 0 FT
6 6 0
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positons
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Code Enforcement Kristy Hightower 1 1 0 FT
Code Enforcement Robert Dacey 1 1 0 FT
2 2 0
Authorized Filled Open
17 16 1
Fire Total
Firefighter/Paramedic Total
Code Enforcement Total
18 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Shop Attendants Joseph Munoz 1 1 0 PT
Shop Attendants Vina VanDang 1 1 0 PT
Shop Attendants Vacant 1 0 1 PT
Shop Attendants Johnnie Tyler-Robi 1 1 0 PT
Shop Attendants Vacant 1 0 1 PT
Shop Attendants Dallon Cox 1 1 0 PT
General Service Worker Clarence Mullenix 1 1 0 PT
General Service Worker Christian Boone 1 1 0 PT
General Service Worker John O'brien 1 1 0 PT
General Service Worker James Neave 1 1 0 PT
General Service Worker Vacant 1 0 1 PT
General Service Worker Raymon Hernande 1 1 0 PT
Authorized Filled Open
12 9 3
Golf Course
Golf Course Total
19 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
HR & Risk Management
Director Leslie Walker 1 1 0
FT
Human Resource
Generalist Serina Rodarte 1 1 0 FT
Administrative Secretary Sonia Tapia 0.5 0.5 0 FT
Authorized Filled Open

2.5 2.5 0
Human Resources
Human Resources Total
20 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positons
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Housing Manager Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Maintenance Worker II Anthony Trulio 1 1 0 FT
PT Maintenance Worker I Vacant 1 0 1 PT
Authorized Filled Open
3 1 2
Housing Total
Housing
21 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
OHV Manager Inge Elmes 1 1 0 FT
OHV Clerk Thomas Harwick 1 1 0 FT
OHV Clerk Typist Vacant 1 0 1 PT
Heavy Equpment Opr I Rene Marroquin 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I Victor Rangel 1 1 0 FT
General Service Worker Jose Leyva 1 1 0 FT
General Service
Worker/Park Aide Vacant 1 0 1 PT
General Service
Worker/Park Aide Tyrina Howard 1 1 0 PT
General Service
Worker/Park Aide Vacant 1 0 1 PT
General Service
Worker/Park Aide Vacant 1 0 1 PT
General Service
Worker/Park Aide Vacant 1 0 1 PT
General Service
Worker/Park Aide Mykaila Bessette 1 1 0 PT
Authorized Filled Open
12 7 5
OHV
OHV Total
22 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positons
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Park & Recreation Supervisor Theresa Oaks 1 1 0 FT
General Service Worker Alex Goodell 1 1 0 FT
Lifeguard Vacant 1 0 1 PT
Lifeguard Vacant 1 0 1 PT
Lifeguard Vacant 1 0 1 PT
Lifeguard Vacant 1 0 1 PT
Lifeguard Vacant 1 0 1 PT
Maintenace Worker l Rene Palma 1 1 0 FT
Rec Aid/Cashier Vacant 1 0 1 PT
Rec Aid/Cashier Braylee Weible 1 1 0 PT
Rec Aid/Cashier Anita Terry 1 1 0 PT
Rec Aid/Cashier Jarad Cox 1 1 0 PT
Rec Aid/Cashier Trinity Avey 1 1 0 PT
Rec Aid/Cashier Vacant 1 0 1 PT
Rec Aid/Cashier (Summer
Camp) Vacant 1 0 1 PT
Rec Aid/Cashier (Summer
Camp) Vacant 1 0 1 PT
Rec Aid/Cashier (Summer
Camp) Vacant 1 0 1 PT
Authorized Filled Open
17 7 10
Parks & Recreation Total
Parks & Recreation
23 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positons
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Range Status
Clerk Typist Lashelle Cooper 1 1 0 15 FT
Administrative Secretary Lilia Garcia 1 1 0 52 FT
Authorized Filled Open
2 2 0
Planning Total
Planning
24 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Police Chief Jesse Hightower 1 1 0 FT
Lieutenant Shannon Hayes 1 1 0 FT
Records Clerk Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Records Clerk Raquel Escobar 1 1 0 FT
Administrative Assistant Ana Bearden 1 1 0 FT
5 4 1
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Sergeant Miguel Rivera 1 1 0 FT
Sergeant Salvador Stewart 1 1 0 FT
Special Investigator John Boston 1 1 0 FT
Detective/Crime Analyst
PT Larry Bandenburg 1 1 0 PT
4 4 0
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Police Officer Leobardo Angulo 1 1 0 FT
Police Officer Marco Lopez 1 1 0 FT
Police Officer Ryan Hulse 1 1 0 FT
Police Officer Michael Kelakios 1 1 0 FT
Police Officer Brian Hansen 1 1 0 FT
Police Officer Joshua Flores 1 1 0 FT
Police Officer Timothy Stivers 1 1 0 FT
Police Officer Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Police Department
Total Police Department Administration
Sargeant & Special Investigator Total
25 April 11, 2023
Police Officer Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Police Officer Robert Ramirez 1 1 0 FT
Police Officer Adrian Duque 1 1 0 FT
11 9 2
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Animal Control Supervisor Vacant 1 0 1 FT
GSW-Kennel Worker Marlayna Hadley 1 1 0 PT
2 1 1
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
CSO II Ryun Guerrero 1 1 0 FT
Correctional Officer/Jailer Leo Rodarte 1 1 0 FT
2 2 0
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Dispatcher I Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Dispatcher I Ronald Lopez 1 1 0 FT
Dispatcher I Geri Angell 1 1 0 FT
Dispatcher I Talia Artalago 1 1 0 FT
Dispatcher I Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Dispatcher I Vacant 1 0 1 FT
6 3 3
Authorized Filled Open
30 23 7
Police Total
Police Officers Total
Total Animal Control
CSO/Jailer TOTAL
Dispatcher Total
26 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Public Works Director Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Administrative Assistant Kari Lee 1 1 0 FT
Administrative Clerk Jennifer Guzman 1 1 0 FT
3 2 1

DIAL A RIDE
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positons
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
DAR Lead Driver Onjie Simmons 1 1 0 FT
DAR Dispatch/Driver Vicky Thomas 1 1 0 FT
DAR Dispatch (On Call) Olivia Mendez 1 1 0 PT
3 3 0
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Facilities Maint Supervisor Michael Garcia 1 1 0 FT
Senior Maint Worker Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Maintenance Worker I
Gaytan Cerda,
Rafael 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I Apolinar Solorio 1 1 0 FT
Janitor Administrator Holly Ibarra 1 1 0 FT
5 4 1

ADMINISTRATION
Total Dial a Ride
Public Works
Total Public Works Administration
Total Facilites & Grounds

SHOP/GARAGE

FACILITIES & GROUNDS
27 April 11, 2023
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Garage Superintendent Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Heavy Equipment
Mechanic Aaron Robinson 1 1 0 FT
1 0 1
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Pumping Operator III Art Van Dang 1 1 0 FT
Water Operator Lead Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Distribution Operator II Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Distribution Operator II Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Distribution Operator II Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Chief Water Operator Amador H. Meza 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker II Pete Galan 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I Chris Terry 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I Andrew Maxwell 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I Dion Kelsey 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I David Toledo 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I Marcos Rodriguez 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I Gerardo Ceja 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I Simon Rodriguez 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I Teddy Maghuyop 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I Alejandro Solorio 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I Adrian Benavides 1 1 0 FT
Total Shop & Garage

WATER DEPARTMENT
28 April 11, 2023
Cross Connection
Specialist Vacant 1 0 1 FT
Heavy Equipment
Mechanic I Cesar Vera 1 1 0 FT
19 14 5
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
WWTP Plant Operator Richard Vasquez 1 1 0 FT
WWTP OIT Vacant 1 0 1 FT
WWTP OIT Patricio Ibarra 1 1 0 FT
3 2 1
Job Title Employee Name Authorized
Positions
Filled
Positions
Open
Positions Status
Heavy Equipment
Operator II Luis Urbina 1 1 0 FT
Heavy Equipment
Operator I Harvey Brown 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I Escamilla Ethan 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I Marion Cato 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I Jason Van Dang 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I
(Clean up Crew) Jesus Rios 1 1 0 FT
Maintenance Worker I
(Clean up Crew) Ivan Solorio 1 1 0 FT
7 7 0
Authorized Filled Open
41 29 9
Total Street Department
Public Works Totals

STREET DEPARTMENT

WASTE WATER TREATMENT
Total Water
Total Waste Water Treatment
29 April 11, 2023
ITEM NO.

DEPARTMENT REPORT

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 11, 2023
PREPARED BY: Inge Elmes, OHV Manager

SUBJECT: OHV MONTHLY DEPARTMENT REPORT
Events
Easter Holiday weekend will be one of the last events for the OHV community before the season ends.

Weather permitting, the OHV riding areas might see a last influx of visitors for Memorial Weekend Holiday.

Operations
Ground crew continues to maintain OHV riding areas, install signage, and upkeep amenities. All projects have been completed for the ground operations grant. Staff has been busy cleaning up riding areas and routes. Park aides are preparing for the upcoming holiday.

Manager Updates
Staff is preparing for the upcoming FY 23/24 budget.

Finance Report
For the month of March, OHV sales totaled $6,338.00. These numbers are actuals and reflect only amounts received within each month. Please refer to Monthly Permit Sales report for FY totals. *Not all proceeds are deposited in the same month.
**OHV sales are deposited to specific OHV Permit Program GL revenue codes #29-3992 through #29- 3998. Please refer to financial statement for details.
***Some merchandise was purchased by staff at a discounted rate. All sales for merchandise are allocated to GL revenue code 29-3691
30 April 11, 2023
Mar MONTHLY OHV PROGRAM SALES FY 22/23
SALES 2023 W4 QTY CASH CHECK CREDIT CARD PAYPAL TOTALS YTD TOTALS Single Permits (Prorated) $10
Single Permits $15 208 $1,785 $300 $810 $225 $3,120 33,435.00 Small Family (Prorated) $40
Small Family $60 11 $120 $60 $480 $660 38,760.00
Large Family (Prorated) $80
Large Family $100 10,100.00
OHV 4 Pack (Prorated) $35
OHV 4 Pack $50 15 $450 $50 $250 $750 14,150
RV Pass (Prorated) $15
RV Pass $30 9 $90 $30 $120 $30 $270 6,510.00
Single Dump Pass $5 23 $105 $10 $115 825
Single Water Pass $5 24 $120 $0 $120 810
Additional Permits (Prorated) $5
Additional Permits $10 1 $10 $10 2,120.00
Free Free 23
Residents Permits Free
Paypal Fees - $4 $4 14 $56 $56 $508
Holiday Week Day - Power $25 3 $75 $75 125
Holiday Week Day - Water $15 3 $45 $45 75
Non-Holiday Weekday-Power $15 4 $60 $60 540.00
Non-Holiday Weekday-Water $10 2 $20 $20 190.00
Holiday Weekend - Power $40 200
Holiday Weekend - Water $20 80
Non-Holiday Weekend-Power $25 10 $150 $100 $250 1,100.00 Non-Holiay Weekend-Water $15 8 $90 $30 $120 405
Shower Tokens $0.50 150 $35 $40 $75 2,070.00
Transient Lodging $150
Vendor Fees $1 2,490.00
Special Event Fees $5
Map Sales $3 7 $21 $0 $21 216
Donations $1 154
Hoodies $40 9 $280 $80 $360 4,480.00
Short Sleeve Shirts $20 3 $60 $0 $60 880.00
Long Sleeve Shirts $30 1 $0 $30 $30 405.00
Caps $20 3 $10 $40 $50 1,075.00
Bucket Hats $20 0 $0 $0 $0 150.00
Visors $15 0 $0 $0 $0 60.00
Beenies $15 3 $45 $0 $45 1,410.00
Tumblers $25 0 $0 $0 $0 145.00
Magnets $5 2 $5 $5 $10 90.00
Ornaments $8 0 $0 $0 $0 20.00
Stickers $3 0 $0 $0 $0 178.00
Coffee Mugs $15 0 $0 $0 $0 175.00
Shot Glasses $8 2 $8 $8 $16 263.00
Keychain $10 0 $0 $0 $0 200.00
MONTHLY TOTALS $3,494 $440 $2,093 $311 $6,338 $124,394.00 31 April 11, 2023

CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 11, 2023
TO: City Council
FROM: Recreation Supervisor – Theresa Oaks
SUBJECT: Department Report for the Month of March
______________________________________________________________________ Events
Staff and volunteers are currently planning for the Desert Tortoise Day Event including the parade. They have also begun planning the 4th of July Event as well.

Operations
During the month of March, our staff have been focused on planning for the upcoming events as well as working on new and existing programming. Staff have begun summer camp discussions including activity planning. Staff continues to try and find activities that will be beneficial and of interest to the community around the Balsitis Park area. Staff are continuing in the process of hiring lifeguards and ensuring that they are trained and ready for opening day. Staff are hoping to have the pool open on Memorial Day Weekend. We Got Next (WGN) Sports continues to offer a wide variety for sports for the youth in the community. Staff are working with a volunteer that will be coaching volleyball on Wednesday afternoons for youth that are interested. Staff have also been working to bring a line dancing class on Thursday nights starting in April from 6-7p, the cost is $5 per class. Adult aerobics continues with an average attendance of about 5. The adult walking club is continuing with an average attendance of 3 to 4. The Strata Center also continues to be open to basketball practice, game room activities and open gym. The Parks free art classes are every Wednesday afternoon. The Wednesday Art Class have proven to be wildly successful with an average attendance of about 20 -25 people. According to our sign in sheets we have had an average daily attendance of approximately 28 people using the Strata. There 32 April 11, 2023
has also been an increased number of people using the playground and outdoor spaces as well.

The maintenance staff have done an amazing job at cleaning up graffiti, making repairs, paining, and cleaning. The Grounds Maintenance staff are currently working on getting the grass healthy at Central Park, as well as fixing the ongoing sprinkler problems at all of the parks.

Programming
ABC Learning – Tues- Fri 9:00-12:00
Adult Aerobics- Tues, Wed, Fri – 10:00-11:00
Adult Walking Club –Tues, Wed, Fri - 11:00-12:00
Open Gym – Tues, Thurs, Fri, 1:00-4:00, 6:00-7:00, and Wednesdays -1:00-8:00 WGN Basketball Practice Tues, Thurs, and Fri - 4:00-6:00 Kids Art Class – Wed 2:30-4 (Art Center)
Line Dancing Class – Thurs 6:00-7:00 (Art Center)
Future Programming
This spring staff, weather permitting, will be bringing back monthly outdoor movie nights. For the summer staff are hoping to bring back Adult Water Aerobics, Adult Open Swim, Special Needs Open Swim, swim lessons for all ages, and open swim into the late afternoon/evening. Staff are also looking forward to hosting concerts in the park on Friday evenings throughout the summer. In addition staff are looking forward to bringing basketballs and board games to Balsitis, and beginning to offer programming and interaction with the community in the area.
33 April 11, 2023
34 April 11, 2023

DEPARTMENT REPORT

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 11, 2023
FROM: INTERWEST/PLANNING
SUBJECT: MONTHLY PLANNING DEPARTMENTAL COUNCIL REPORT
Staff
1-Planning Clerk (LaShelle Cooper)
1-Planning Admin (Lilia “Liz” Garcia)
1-City Planner (Open Position)
1-Consulting Company (Interwest)
Projects/Applications
This report includes the following items:
• An update on major planning efforts
• A report on the status of projects for the month of February and March 2023 • A tentative schedule for Director Hearings in the months of April and May Review of Pending General Plan Amendments/Rezones
The Planning Commission and the City Council considered a set of six pending projects that will require General Plan Amendments (GPAs) and/or zoning code amendments (Rezones). Staff received direction from the City Council to process the five pending GPA/Rezones associated with cannabis projects and received direction to prepare options for allowing mixed use (residential) development on California City Boulevard in Office and Commercial zoning districts.

Staff is preparing options for California City Boulevard mixed use that is anticipated to be presented to the Planning Commission in April. Staff is also preparing a CEQA guidance memo for applicants seeking GPAs/Rezones that would covert O/RA (Open Space/Residential Agriculture) land to M-1 (Industrial). This guidance will assist applicants with preparing required CEQA documents.

Padron Metal Finishing Project
Staff met with the CEQA consultant for the Padron rezoning on April 3rd.

Avantus Solar Projects
Avantus, the firm that proposed and entitled the Kudu and Bellefield solar projects, has moved forward with plans to construct the Kudu solar project. The City is in the process of reviewing the project for compliance with project conditions of approval and mitigation measures from the project EIR. While the Kudu Conditional Use Permit has been approved, the project design details were not previously available to complete the project’s Site Plan Review (SPR) – staff is now preparing the Kudu SPR for administrative review.

Attil Farms
Complaints have been received about cannabis odor from Attil Farms. An inspection was done by the Building department, which demonstrated that carbon air filters have been installed in all buildings for the purpose of odor reduction. No swamp coolers were installed.
35 April 11, 2023
Progress on SPR Backlog
Staff continues to reduce the backlog of pending projects. Over the past twelve months approximately 36 SPR’s have been reviewed and approved, reducing the project backlog by 50%. Staff continues to prepare projects for Director’s Hearings, but remaining projects are requiring increasing level of effort due to various complications associated with the projects. We are waiting for updated/revised plans or missing information from the applicants on many pending projects. Upcoming hearings are scheduled for April 20th, May 4th, and May 16th.

The following projects were approved at the Director’s Hearing on March 16, 2023: SPR 21-56, 22-24.

The following projects were approved at the Director’s Hearing on February 2, 2023: SPR 22-10, 22-56, 22-31.

The following projects were approved at the Director’s Hearing on February 23, 2023: SPR 22-11.

Thank You
36 April 11, 2023
SPR Number APN Project Name Status
22-01 206-010-16 760 LINE Approved
22-02 206-041-42 California Jungle Approved
22-03 216-130-01 Vass Green CEQA Review
22-04 206-042-07 Exotica Nursery Gardens CEQA Review
22-05 216-150-19 7 Leaves LLC Withdrawn
22-06 00-00 Highly Fasionable Minor- Approved
22-07 216-170-05 El Patron Resturant Approved
22-08 457-020-05,11,12, 26 Traditional Ranch Under Staff Review 22-09 00-00 ReMax Clearview Minor- Approved
22-10 206-032-25 GG Wholesale Approved
22-11 299-264-02 Allay Essence Approved
22-12 302-273-03 Arpine Cherkezyan Incomplete
22-13 302-271-07 Gevorg Juharyan CEQA Review
22-14 225-092-12 Oasis Approved
22-15 00-00 Elsy's Donut Bakery Minor- Approved
22-16 230-081-30 Green Pay Recycle Minor- Approved
22-17 00-00 Operation Safe Minor- Approved
22-18 206-041-04 Accurate Green Approved
22-19 00-00 JMC Laundromat Minor- Approved
22-20 216-150-41 Vardan Nalbandyan CEQA Review
22-21 00-00 Willis Boxing Minor- Approved
22-22 206-042-02 Hemp Plantion LLC Incomplete
22-23 227-010-03 RV Dump City Project Approved
22-24 206-031-27, 28 Nestle PM Approved
22-25 206-042-14, 15 HR Cali Inc Incomplete
22-26 00-00 Lee's Second Hand Minor- Approved
22-27 00-00 DNR Auto Registration Minor- Approved
22-28 210-230-14 GCC Transition LLC- 4plex Minor- Approved 22-29 00-00 Majestic Beautiy Supply Minor- Approved
22-30 235-234-05 Hyundai- Flying Car Approved
22-31 206-042-43 GOK Unlimited Approved
22-32 00-00 CCB Uhaul at Ace Minor- Approved
22-33 00-00 Royal Womb Ministries Minor- Approved
22-34 00-00 Cal City Auto Registration Minor- Approved
22-35 206-042-16, 28, 29 Biedenhard Equities, LLC Waiting for Resubmittal 22-36 218-010-04 RV Park pending CEQA from applicant
22-37 216-170-05 El Patron no record of action
22-38 213-110-26 Dollar General Waiting for Resubmittal 22-39 302-077-02 Global Cannabis Corporation CEQA Review 22-40 299-173-04, 03, 02 Rom & Ben's RV Service Minor- Approved 22-41 00-00 Cal City Car Wash Withdrawn
22-42 00-00 King Trillion Minor- Approved
22-43 206-032-36 ASM & MS Pure Line Cultivation Approved 22-44 79 parcels KUDU Under Staff Review
22-45 00-00 Bellefield Under Staff Review
22-46 235-243-05 Hyunndai Tech Center PH 1b Approved
22-47 302-271-09, thru -13 Calrox CEQA Review
22-48 00-00 DNR Auto Registration Minor- Approved
22-49 206-032-02 XO Quality Waiting for Resubmittal
22-50 216-18-023 SFV Remodel Withdrawn
22-51 208381-02 General Dollar Expansion Withdrawn
22-52 206-032-32 MGGM Shulo CEQA Review
22-53 206-032-37 Veegn Galustyan Withdrawn
22-54 00-00 Taste of Fire Minor- Approved
22-55 00-00 Saucy Sliders Minor- Approved
22-56 00-00 Allison Morgan Family + Commiunity Approved 22-57 00-00 Cal City Car Wash Minor- Approved
2022-2023 Project Log
2022
37 April 11, 2023
SPR Number APN Project Name Status
23-01 206-042-27 Stock up Self Storage Minor- Approved
23-02 225-201-03 Mojave Jade Under Staff Review
23-03 225-091-19 Attil Farms Under Staff Review
23-04 00-00 Hair and Nails to Dye for Minor- Approved
23-05 00-00 The Windsom Church Withdrawn
23-06 216-180-10 KPACK Incomplete
23-07 8360 Dogwood Ave La Tapatia Minor- Approved
Incomplete 4
Withdrawn 5
CEQA Review 9
Waiting for Resubmittal 6
Under Staff Review 5
Minor- Approved 23
Approved 14
Open SPR Projects: 24
APN Project Name Status
22-01 235-243-05 Hyundai Approved
22-02 227-010-03 RV Dump Station Approved
22-03 218-010-04 RV Park Incomplete
2023 23-01 203-090-12 The Windsom Church Incomplete
Lot Merger APN Project Name Status
19-02 299-263-01, 08 Leland Krelle Under Staff Review
19-03 299-263-04, 05 Leland Krelle Under Staff Review
19-04 261-111-05, 06, 09, 10 Leland Krelle Under Staff Review 21-02 216-010-14, 30 Arvin Bagdsaryan Under Staff Review 21-06 206-032-20, 21 Jason VanCuren Under Staff Review
21-07 302-271-01, 39 Patrick Henderson Under Staff Review 22-01 299-263-01 All in One Solution Tech Inc Under Staff Review 22-02 203-420-02 + 20 Urgent Care Under Staff Review
22-03 225-221-02 + 03 Karo Dzheragyan Approved
22-04 204-084-13 + 08 AL7 Engineering Approved
22-05 206-031-27 + 28 Chris Aslanyan Under Staff Review APN Project Name Status
2022 22-01 302-273-31; 32; 33 George Mamayan Approved
APN Project Name Status
ZC 22-01 302-020-22 Mr. Leaf Under Staff Review
ZC 22-02 302-391-19 Olivia Davidson Under Staff Review
ZC 22-03 340-03-830 Mike Levi Withdrawn
ZC 22-04 210-884-14 Pardon Metal Finishing Under Staff Review ZC 22-05 350-031-19 Innovative Realestate Under Staff Review ZC 22-06 225-201-09 Cal City Industrial Park Under Staff Review ZC 22-06 225-201-09 Dennis Gootrad Under Staff Review
Zone Change
2022
Conditional Use Permit
Lot Line Adjustment
2021
2022
2019
2022
SPR 2022-23 Totals
2023
38 April 11, 2023

PROJECT TYPE FEBRUARY TOTAL MARCH TOTAL
CUP: 1
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS:

LOT MERGERS:

SPR MAJOR: 2 1
SPR MINOR: 2 1
TENATIVE PARCEL MAPS:

VARIANCE: 1
ZONE CHANGE & GPA:

ZONE TEXT AMENDMENTS:

PROJECT TYPE FEBRUARY TOTAL MARCH TOTAL
CUP:

LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS:

LOT MERGERS:

SPR MAJOR:

SPR MINOR : 2 1
TENATIVE PARCEL MAPS:

VARIANCE:

ZONE CHANGE & GPA:

ZONE TEXT AMENDMENTS:

PROJECT TYPE FEBRUARY TOTAL MARCH TOTAL
CUP:

LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS:

LOT MERGERS:

SPR: $3,545.00 $5,955.00
TENATIVE PARCEL MAPS:

TENATIVE TRACT MAPS:

VARIANCE:

ZONE CHANGE & GPA:

Other:

Monthly Total $3,545.00 $5,955.00

PLANNING RECAP
Covers Period February 1- March 31, 2023
REVENUE (Non Reimbursable)

NEW PROJECTS

APPROVED / COMPLETED PROJECTS
39 April 11, 2023
Balance on Net Balance on Percent
1/31/2023 Transactions 2/28/2023 of Total
Bank of the Sierra -- General Checking $ 3,365,920 $ (1,326,540) $ 2,039,380 9.32% Bank of the Sierra -- Cannibas Checking $ 368,707 $ 69,742 $ 438,448 2.00% Sub-Total Operating Accounts $ 3,734,627 $ (1,256,798) $ 2,477,829 Balance on Net Balance on Percent
1/31/2023 Transactions 2/28/2023 of Total
Local Agency Investment Fund (122) $ 12,761,392 $ 1,500,000 $ 14,261,392 65.14% Kern County Investment Fund (20202) $ 4,405,628 $ 23,920 $ 4,429,548 20.23% Multi-Bank Securities (CD Manager) $ 726,291 $ (2,129) $ 724,162 3.31% Sub-Total Investment Accounts $ 17,893,311 $ 1,521,791 $ 19,415,102 Total City Operating Funds $ 21,627,937 $ 264,993 $ 21,892,930 100.00% Checking & CD Accounts 1/31/2023 Net Transactions 2/28/2023 Housing Corp. -- Bank of the Sierra, Checking $ 1,688,195 $ 30,406 $ 1,718,601 88.13% Housing Corp. -- Bank of the Sierra, CD 0350 $ 71,903 $ 3 $ 71,906 3.69% Housing Corp. -- Bank of the Sierra, CD 7653 $ 30,902 $ 1 $ 30,903 1.58% Housing Corp. -- Bank of the Sierra, CD 7654 $ 20,936 $ 1 $ 20,937 1.07% Housing Corp. -- Bank of the Sierra, CD 7655 $ 45,473 $ 2 $ 45,475 2.33% Housing Corp. -- Bank of the Sierra, CD 9374 $ 62,197 $ 3 $ 62,199 3.19% Total Housing Corporation Funds $ 1,919,606 $ 30,416 $ 1,950,022 100.00% Checking & CD Investment Accounts 1/31/2023 Net Transactions 2/28/2023 SDI -- Bank of the Sierra, Checking $ 550,843 $ (6,240) $ 544,604 0.66% SDI -- Bank of the Sierra CD $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 0.30% SDI -- US Bank Investments *$ 82,804,870 $ (1,076,538) $ 81,728,331 99.04% Total SDI Agency Funds $ 83,605,713 $ (1,082,778) $ 82,522,935 100.00% Checking & Investment Accounts 1/31/2023 Net Transactions 2/28/2023 Successor -- Bank of the Sierra, Checking $ 940,913 $ (397,469) $ 543,444 30.58% RDA/Successor -- US Bank Investments $ 862,083 $ 371,556 $ 1,233,639 69.42% Total Successor Agency Funds $ 1,802,997 $ (25,914) $ 1,777,083 100.00% California City, California 93505

TREASURER'S MONTHLY REPORT OF INVESTMENT
February 2023
The values presented in this report are as of the last bank day of the month and are only a snapshot in time.

The General Funds investment portfolio consists of funds for operations, Capital Improvement Projects (CIP), water rate stabilization, administration replacements and reserves.

General Operating Accounts
General Investment Accounts
Restricted Housing Corporation Accounts
Restricted SDI Accounts
Note: Interest earned from the SDI CD is directly deposited into the SDI checking account monthly.

Restricted RDA/Successor Agency Accounts
1 of 2
40 April 11, 2023

INVESTMENT POLICY
* Contact City Treasurer for US Bank investment breakdown. 1/31/2023 2/28/2023
Beginning Market Value 81,855,636 82,804,870
Ending Market Value 82,804,870 81,728,331
Investment Results 949,234 (1,076,538)
1/31/2023 2/28/2023
Beginning Market Value 0 0
Ending Market Value 0 0
Investment Results - (0)
1/31/2023 2/28/2023
Beginning Market Value 0 0
Ending Market Value 0 126,556
Investment Results - 126,556
1/31/2023 2/28/2023
Beginning Market Value 0 0
Ending Market Value 0 245,000
Investment Results - 245,000
1/31/2023 2/28/2023
Beginning Market Value 862,082 862,082
Ending Market Value 862,082 862,082
Investment Results - -
Total RDA/Successor Investment Assets 862,083 1,233,639 Total "US Bank" Investment Assets 83,666,953 82,961,970 California City, California 93505
Market Value Summary - SUCCESSOR AGENCY Proj Area TAX RESERVE

TREASURER'S MONTHLY REPORT OF INVESTMENT
February 2023
The Treasurer shall invest the City's monies as permitted in the Citie's approved investment policy and approval of both the City Manager and Finance Director. The Treasurer shall consider current and projected cash needs in making such investments.

US Bank
SDI Account
Market Value Summary - CUSTODIAN ACCOUNT
US Bank
RDA/Successor Agency Accounts
Market Value Summary - REDEVELOPEMENT AGENCY PROJ AREA TAX Market Value Summary - SUCCESSOR AGENCY Proj Area TAX INTEREST Market Value Summary - SUCCESSOR AGENCY Proj Area TAX PRINCIPAL 2 of 2
41 April 11, 2023
CC 1.
42 April 11, 2023
43 April 11, 2023
44 April 11, 2023
45 April 11, 2023
46 April 11, 2023
47 April 11, 2023
48 April 11, 2023
49 April 11, 2023
50 April 11, 2023
51 April 11, 2023

CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 11, 2023
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Inge Elmes, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Services Agreement for Project Development Services Between Arrow Engineering Services Inc. (AESI) and the City of California City _____________________________________________________________________________________

BACKGROUND
This project was approved at the March 14th, 2023 council meeting and was requested by council to be brought forward to expand on the GIS system.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement for project development services between AESI and the City of California City for the completion of the GIS system.

FISCAL IMPACT
Cost not to exceed $35,000.00. Costs are divided between three GL codes, 10-4168-315, 10-4170-315, and 10-5117-315.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This Action is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

ATTACHMENTS:

A. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
B. SCOPE OF WORK
CC 2.
52 April 11, 2023
2023

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
(Engagement: PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES)
(Parties: Arrow Engineering Services Inc. (AESI) and City of California City)

THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (hereinafter, “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of ________ 2023, (hereinafter, the “Effective Date”) by and between the CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, a municipal corporation (hereinafter, “CITY”) and Arrow Engineering Services, Inc. (AESI), (hereinafter, “CONSULTANT”). For the purposes of this Agreement, CITY and CONSULTANT may be referred to collectively by the capitalized term “Parties.” The capitalized term “Party” may refer to CITY or CONSULTANT interchangeably, as appropriate.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY requires professional project development services; and WHEREAS, CITY staff has determined that CONSULTANT possesses the experience, skills and training necessary to competently provide such services to CITY; and
WHEREAS, the execution of this Agreement was approved by the California City City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 4, 2023, under Agenda Item No. _____.

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, CITY and CONSULTANT agree as follows:

ENGAGEMENT TERMS

1.1 TERM: This Agreement shall have a term commencing from the Effective Date and ending one (1) year after the Effective Date (hereinafter, the “Term”). The City shall have the unilateral option, at its sole discretion, to renew this Agreement automatically for no more than two (2) additional one-year terms. Nothing in this Section shall operate to prohibit or otherwise restrict the CITY’s ability to terminate this Agreement at any time for convenience or for cause as provided under Article V (Termination), below.

1.2 SCOPE OF SERVICES:

A. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, CONSULTANT agrees to provide the services and tasks described in the written proposal of CONSULTANT entitled “Citywide GIS Projects Development As-Needed Services Amendment #1” dated March 30, 2023 (hereinafter, the “CONSULTANT Proposal”). The CONSULTANT Proposal is attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit “A” respectively. The term “Scope of Work” 53 April 11, 2023
shall be a collective reference to the CONSULTANT Proposal. The capitalized term “Work” shall be a collective reference to all the various services and tasks referenced in the Scope of Work. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of the Scope of Work and the provisions of this Agreement to which the Scope of Work is attached, the provisions of this Agreement shall govern and control.

1.3 PROSECUTION OF WORK:

A. CONSULTANT shall perform the Work contemplated under this Agreement on an on-call, as-needed basis. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to grant CONSULTANT the exclusive right to perform any of the types of services or tasks contemplated under this Agreement nor shall anything in this Agreement be construed to entitle CONSULTANT to the receipt of any sums under this Agreement, except to the extent CITY requests the performance of any Work in the manner described below and such Work is in fact performed and completed by CONSULTANT and accepted by CITY. CITY requests for the performance of specific services or tasks contemplated under this Agreement shall be made in the form of a written work order(s) issued by the City Representative (each such written request hereinafter referred to as a “Work Order”). Each Work Order shall include the following information:

1. A detailed description of the specific services or tasks requested;

2. The location of where the particular services or tasks are to be performed, if applicable;

3. A not-to-exceed budget for performing the services or tasks;

4. A timeline for completing the requested services or tasks;

5. Any other information CITY deems necessary and relevant to the requested services or tasks; and

6. The signature of the City Representative, confirming that the services or tasks have been authorized by the City Representative.

B. CONSULTANT shall perform no Work under this Agreement without a written request from the City Representative, containing the information set forth in Section 1.3(A) above;
C. CONSULTANT shall perform the Work continuously and with due diligence so as to complete the Work by the completion date indicated in each Work Order. CONSULTANT shall cooperate with CITY and in no manner interfere with the work of CITY, its employees or other consultants, contractors or agents;
D. CONSULTANT shall not claim or be entitled to receive any compensation or damage because of the failure of CONSULTANT, or its subconsultants, to have related services or tasks completed in a timely manner; 54 April 11, 2023
E. CONSULTANT shall at all times enforce strict discipline and good order among CONSULTANT’s employees; and
F. CONSULTANT, at its sole expense, shall pay all sales, consumer, use or other similar taxes required by law.

1.4 COMPENSATION: CONSULTANT shall perform the Work in accordance with the “Fee Schedule” in the CONSULTANT Proposal (hereinafter, the “COMPENSATION RATE”). The foregoing notwithstanding, CONSULTANT’s total compensation for the performance of all Work contemplated under this Agreement, will not exceed the aggregate budgeted sum of THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($35,000) (hereinafter, the “Not-to-Exceed Sum”) during the Term of this Agreement, unless such added expenditure is first approved by the City Council. In the event CONSULTANT’s charges are projected to exceed the Aggregate Not-to-Exceed Sum prior to the expiration of this Agreement, CITY may suspend CONSULTANT’s performance pending CITY approval of any anticipated expenditures in excess of the Aggregate Not-to-Exceed Sum or any other CITY approved amendment to the compensation terms of this Agreement.

1.5 PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION: The Not-to-Exceed Sum will be paid to CONSULTANT in monthly increments as the Work is completed. Following the conclusion of each calendar month, CONSULTANT will submit to CITY an itemized invoice indicating the services performed and tasks completed during the recently concluded calendar month, including services and tasks performed and the reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses incurred. If the amount of CONSULTANT’s monthly compensation is a function of hours worked by CONSULTANT’s personnel, the invoice should indicate the number of hours worked in the recently concluded calendar month, the persons responsible for performing the Work, the rate of compensation at which such services and tasks were performed, the subtotal for each task and service performed and a grand total for all services performed. Within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of each invoice, CITY will notify CONSULTANT in writing of any disputed amounts included in the invoice.

Within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt of each invoice, CITY will pay all undisputed amounts included on the invoice. CITY will not withhold applicable taxes or other authorized deductions from payments made to CONSULTANT.

1.6 ACCOUNTING RECORDS: CONSULTANT will maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all matters covered under this Agreement for a period of three (3) years after the expiration or termination of this Agreement. CITY will have the right to access and examine such records, without charge, during normal business hours. CITY will further have the right to audit such records, to make transcripts therefrom and to inspect all program data, documents, proceedings, and activities.

1.7 ABANDONMENT BY CONSULTANT: In the event CONSULTANT ceases to perform the Work agreed to under this Agreement or otherwise abandons the undertaking contemplated herein prior to the expiration of this Agreement or prior to completion of any or all tasks set forth in the Scope of Services, CONSULTANT will deliver to CITY immediately and without delay, all materials, records and other 55 April 11, 2023
work product prepared or obtained by CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. Furthermore, CONSULTANT will only be compensated for the reasonable value of the services, tasks and other Work performed up to the time of cessation or abandonment, less a deduction for any damages, costs or additional expenses which CITY may incur as a result of CONSULTANT’s cessation or abandonment.

II.

PERFORMANCE OF AGREEMENT

2.1 CITY’S REPRESENTATIVE: The CITY hereby designates Inge Elmes, Acting City Manager, (hereinafter, the “CITY Representative”) to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement. The CITY Representative or their designee will act on behalf of the CITY for all purposes under this Agreement.

CONSULTANT will not accept directions or orders from any person other than the CITY Representative or their designee.

2.2 CONSULTANT REPRESENTATIVE: CONSULTANT hereby designates Brian D.

Glideen, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (hereinafter, “CONSULTANT Representative”). CONSULTANT Representative will have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the CONSULTANT for all purposes under this Agreement. CONSULTANT Representative or their designee will supervise and direct the performance of the Work, using their best skill and attention, and will be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Work under this Agreement. Notice to the CONSULTANT Representative will constitute notice to CONSULTANT.

2.3 COORDINATION OF SERVICE; CONFORMANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS:

CONSULTANT agrees to work closely with CITY staff in the performance of the Work and this Agreement and will be available to CITY staff and the CITY Representative at all reasonable times. All work prepared by CONSULTANT will be subject to inspection and approval by CITY Representative or his or her designees.

2.4 STANDARD OF CARE; PERFORMANCE OF EMPLOYEES: CONSULTANT represents, acknowledges and agrees to the following:

A. CONSULTANT will perform all Work skillfully, competently and to the highest standards of CONSULTANT’s profession;
B. CONSULTANT shall at all times employ such force, plant, materials, and tools as will be sufficient in the opinion of the CITY to perform the Services within the time limits established, and as provided herein. It is understood and agreed that said tools, equipment, apparatus, facilities, labor, and material shall be furnished and said Services performed and completed as required by the Agreement, and subject to the approval of the CITY’s authorized representative;
56 April 11, 2023
C. CONSULTANT will perform all Work in a manner reasonably satisfactory to the CITY;
D. CONSULTANT will comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, including the conflict-of-interest provisions of Government Code Section 1090 and the Political Reform Act (Government Code Section 81000 et seq.) CONSULTANT shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If CONSULTANT performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations, CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom; E. CONSULTANT understands the nature and scope of the Work to be performed under this Agreement as well as any and all schedules of performance;
F. All of CONSULTANT’s employees and agents possess sufficient skill, knowledge, training and experience to perform those services and tasks assigned to them by CONSULTANT; and
G. All of CONSULTANT’s employees and agents (including, but not limited to, subcontractors and subconsultants) possess all licenses, permits, certificates, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the tasks and services contemplated under this Agreement and all such licenses, permits, certificates, qualifications and approvals will be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement and made available to CITY for copying and inspection.

The Parties acknowledge and agree that CONSULTANT will perform, at CONSULTANT’s own cost and expense and without any reimbursement from CITY, any services necessary to correct any errors or omissions caused by CONSULTANT’s failure to comply with the standard of care set forth under this Section or by any like failure on the part of CONSULTANT’s employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors and subconsultants. Such effort by CONSULTANT to correct any errors or omissions will be commenced immediately upon their discovery by either Party and will be completed within seven (7) calendars days from the date of discovery or such other extended period of time authorized by the CITY Representative in writing and in her sole and absolute discretion. The Parties acknowledge and agree that CITY’s acceptance of any work performed by CONSULTANT or on CONSULTANT’s behalf will not constitute a release of any deficiency or delay in performance. The Parties further acknowledge, understand and agree that CITY has relied upon the foregoing representations of CONSULTANT, including but not limited to the representation that CONSULTANT possesses the skills, training, knowledge and experience necessary to perform the Work skillfully, competently and to the highest standards of CONSULTANT’s profession.

2.5 ASSIGNMENT: The skills, training, knowledge and experience of CONSULTANT are material to CITY’s willingness to enter into this Agreement. Accordingly, CITY has an interest in the qualifications and capabilities of the person(s) who will 57 April 11, 2023
perform the services and tasks to be undertaken by CONSULTANT or on behalf of CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. In recognition of this interest, CONSULTANT agrees that it will not assign or transfer, either directly or indirectly or by operation of law, this Agreement or the performance of any of CONSULTANT’s duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the CITY. In the absence of CITY’s prior written consent, any attempted assignment or transfer will be ineffective, null and void and will constitute a material breach of this Agreement.

2.6 SUBSTITUTION OF KEY PERSONNEL: CONSULTANT has represented to CITY that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, CONSULTANT may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of CITY. In the event that CITY and CONSULTANT cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, CITY shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the CITY, or who are determined by the CITY to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the CONSULTANT at the request of the CITY.

2.7 CONTROL AND PAYMENT OF SUBORDINATES; INDEPENDENT
CONTRACTOR: The Work will be performed by CONSULTANT or under CONSULTANT’s strict supervision. CONSULTANT will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Work subject to the requirements of this Agreement. CITY retains CONSULTANT on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. CONSULTANT reserves the right to perform similar or different services for other principals during the term of this Agreement, provided such work does not unduly interfere with CONSULTANT’s competent and timely performance of the Work contemplated under this Agreement and provided the performance of such services does not result in the unauthorized disclosure of CITY’s confidential or proprietary information. Any additional personnel performing the Work under this Agreement on behalf of CONSULTANT are not employees of CITY and will at all times be under CONSULTANT’s exclusive direction and control. CONSULTANT will pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due such personnel and will assume responsibility for all benefits, payroll taxes, Social Security and Medicare payments and the like. CONSULTANT will be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: Social Security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, workers’ compensation insurance and the like.

2.8 REMOVAL OF EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS: If any of CONSULTANT’s officers, employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors or subconsultants is determined by the CITY Representative to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely performance of the tasks assigned to CONSULTANT, a threat to persons or property, or if any of CONSULTANT’s officers, employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors or subconsultants fail or refuse to perform the Work in 58 April 11, 2023
a manner acceptable to the CITY, such officer, employee, agent, contractor, subcontractor or subconsultant will be promptly removed by CONSULTANT and will not be reassigned to perform any of the Work.

2.9 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS: CONSULTANT will keep itself informed of and in compliance with all applicable federal, state or local laws to the extent such laws control or otherwise govern the performance of the Work. CONSULTANT’s compliance with applicable laws will include, without limitation, compliance with all applicable Cal/OSHA requirements and applicable regulations of the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urbanization.

2.10 NON-DISCRIMINATION: CONSULTANT represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination.

CONSULTANT will be solely responsible for the negligent acts and/or omissions of its employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors and subconsultants.

CONSULTANT and all persons retained or employed by CONSULTANT will have no authority, express or implied, to bind CITY in any manner, nor to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of, or against, CITY, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred to CONSULTANT under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred by CITY in writing.

III.

INSURANCE

3.1 DUTY TO PROCURE AND MAINTAIN INSURANCE: Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of the Work, CONSULTANT will procure and maintain policies of insurance that meet the requirements and specifications set forth under this Article. CONSULTANT will procure and maintain the following insurance coverage, at its own expense:

A. Commercial General Liability Insurance: CONSULTANT will procure and maintain Commercial General Liability Insurance (“CGL Coverage”) as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence Form CG 0001) or its equivalent. Such CGL Coverage will have minimum limits of no less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) in the general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, property damage, operations, products and completed operations, and contractual liability. 59 April 11, 2023
B. Automobile Liability Insurance: CONSULTANT will procure and maintain Automobile Liability Insurance as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering Automobile Liability, Code 1 (any auto). Such Automobile Liability Insurance will have minimum limits of no less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

C. Workers’ Compensation Insurance/ Employer’s Liability Insurance: A policy of Workers’ Compensation Insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which will indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for both CONSULTANT and CITY against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by CONSULTANT in the course of carrying out the Work contemplated in this Agreement.

D. Errors & Omissions Insurance: For the full term of this Agreement and for a period of three (3) years thereafter, CONSULTANT will procure and maintain Errors and Omissions Liability Insurance appropriate to CONSULTANT’s profession. Such coverage will have minimum limits of no less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) per claim.

3.2 ADDITIONAL INSURED REQUIREMENTS: The CGL Coverage and the Automobile Liability Insurance will contain an endorsement naming the CITY and CITY’s elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds.

3.3 REQUIRED CARRIER RATING: All varieties of insurance required under this Agreement will be procured from insurers admitted in the State of California and authorized to issue policies directly to California insureds. Except as otherwise provided elsewhere under this Article, all required insurance will be procured from insurers who, according to the latest edition of the Best’s Insurance Guide, have an A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII. CITY may also accept policies procured by insurance carriers with a Standard & Poor’s rating of no less than BBB according to the latest published edition of the Standard & Poor’s rating guide. As to Workers’ Compensation Insurance/ Employer’s Liability Insurance, the CITY Representative is authorized to authorize lower ratings than those set forth in this Section.

3.4 PRIMACY OF CONSULTANT’S INSURANCE: All policies of insurance provided by CONSULTANT will be primary to any coverage available to CITY or CITY’s elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CITY or CITY’s elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers will be in excess of CONSULTANT’s insurance and will not contribute with it.

3.5 WAIVER OF SUBROGATION: All insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Agreement will not prohibit CONSULTANT or CONSULTANT’s officers, employees, agents, subcontractors or subconsultants from waiving the right of 60 April 11, 2023
subrogation prior to a loss. CONSULTANT hereby waives all rights of subrogation against CITY, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

Accordingly, CONSULTANT warrants, represents and agrees that it will furnish CITY with original certificates of insurance and endorsements evidencing the coverage required under this Article on forms satisfactory to CITY in its sole and absolute discretion. The certificates of insurance and endorsements for each insurance policy will be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, and will be on forms provided by the CITY if requested. All certificates of insurance and endorsements will be received and approved by CITY as a condition precedent to CONSULTANT’s commencement of any Work or any of the Work. Upon CITY’s written request, CONSULTANT will also provide CITY with certified copies of all required insurance policies and endorsements.

3.7 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN COVERAGE: In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced immediately so as to avoid a lapse in the required coverage, CITY has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary, and any premium paid by CITY will be promptly reimbursed by CONTRACTOR or CITY will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, CITY may cancel this Agreement effective upon notice.

3.8 SPECIAL RISKS OR CIRCUMSTANCES: City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

IV.

INDEMNIFICATION

Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent CONSULTANT’s services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to Claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the CONSULTANT. 61 April 11, 2023
CONSULTANT’s obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the CITY, its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers.

4.2 To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the CITY Indemnitees from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys’ fees, expert fees and all other costs, and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with CONSULTANT’s performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except such loss or damage which is caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY.

4.3 CITY shall have the right to offset against the amount of any compensation due to CONSULTANT under this Agreement, any amount due to CITY from CONSULTANT as a result of CONSULTANT’s failure to either pay CITY promptly for any costs associated with CONSULTANT’s obligations to indemnify the CITY Indemnitees under this Article, or related to CONSULTANT’s failure to either (i) pay taxes on amounts received pursuant to this Agreement or (ii) comply with applicable workers’ compensation laws.

4.4 The obligations of CONSULTANT under this Article will not be limited by the provisions of any workers’ compensation act or similar act. CONSULTANT expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to CITY and CITY’s elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers.

4.5 CONSULTANT agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth herein this Article from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. In the event CONSULTANT fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, CONSULTANT agrees to be fully responsible and indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY and CITY’s elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all claims and losses, costs or expenses for any damage due to death or injury to any person and injury to any property resulting from any alleged intentional, reckless, negligent, or otherwise wrongful acts, errors or omissions of CONSULTANT’s subcontractors or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. Such costs and expenses shall include reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred by counsel of CITY’s choice.

4.6 CITY does not, and shall not waive any rights that it may possess against CONSULTANT because of the acceptance by CITY, or the deposit with CITY, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. This hold harmless and indemnification provision shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost, or expense.
62 April 11, 2023

4.7 This Article and all provisions contained herein (including but not limited to the duty to indemnify, defend, and hold free and harmless) shall survive the termination or normal expiration of this Agreement and is in addition to any other rights or remedies which the CITY may have at law or in equity.

TERMINATION

5.1 TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE: CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time for convenience and without cause by giving prior written notice of CITY’s intent to terminate this Agreement which notice shall specify the effective date of such termination, CITY will give a minimum of seven (7) days notice of Termination. Upon such termination for convenience, CONSULTANT will be compensated only for those services and tasks which have been performed by CONSULTANT up to the effective date of the termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause as provided under Section 5.2, below. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, CITY may require CONSULTANT to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data, as defined in section 6.1 below, and other information of any kind prepared by CONSULTANT in connection with the performance of the Work. CONSULTANT will be required to provide such Documents and Data within fifteen (15) calendar days of CITY’s written request. No actual or asserted breach of this Agreement on the part of CITY pursuant to Section 5.2, below, will operate to prohibit or otherwise restrict CITY’s ability to terminate this Agreement for convenience as provided under this Section.

5.2 EVENTS OF DEFAULT; BREACH OF AGREEMENT:

A. In the event either Party fails to perform any duty, obligation, service or task set forth under this Agreement (or fails to timely perform or properly perform any such duty, obligation, service or task set forth under this Agreement), an event of default (hereinafter, “Event of Default”) will occur. For all Events of Default, the Party alleging an Event of Default will give written notice to the defaulting Party (hereinafter referred to as a “Default Notice”) which will specify: (i) the nature of the Event of Default; (ii) the action required to cure the Event of Default; (iii) a date by which the Event of Default will be cured, which will not be less than the applicable cure period set forth under Sections 5.2B and 5.2C below or if a cure is not reasonably possible within the applicable cure period, to begin such cure and diligently prosecute such cure to completion. The Event of Default will constitute a breach of this Agreement if the defaulting Party fails to cure the Event of Default within the applicable cure period or any extended cure period allowed under this Agreement.

B. CONSULTANT will cure the following Events of Defaults within the following time periods:
i. Within ten (10) business days of CITY’s issuance of a Default Notice for any failure of CONSULTANT to timely provide CITY or CITY’s 63 April 11, 2023
employees or agents with any information and/or written reports, documentation or work product which CONSULTANT is obligated to provide to CITY or CITY’s employees or agents under this Agreement.

In addition to any other failure on the part of CONSULTANT to perform any duty, obligation, service or task set forth under this Agreement (or the failure to timely perform or properly perform any such duty, obligation, service or task), an Event of Default on the part of CONSULTANT will include, but will not be limited to the following: (i) CONSULTANT’s refusal or failure to perform any of the services or tasks called for under the Scope of Work; (ii) CONSULTANT’s failure to fulfill or perform its obligations under this Agreement within the specified time or if no time is specified, within a reasonable time; (iii) CONSULTANT’s and/or its employees’ disregard or violation of any federal, state, local law, rule, procedure or regulation; (iv) the initiation of proceedings under any bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership, reorganization, or similar legislation as relates to CONSULTANT, whether voluntary of involuntary; (v) CONSULTANT’s refusal or failure to perform or observe any covenant, condition, obligation or provision of this Agreement; and/or (vi) CITY’s discovery that a statement representation or warranty by CONSULTANT relating to this Agreement is false, misleading or erroneous in any material respect.

C. CITY will cure any Event of Default asserted by CONSULTANT within fortyfive (45) calendar days of CONSULTANT’s issuance of a Default Notice, unless the Event of Default cannot reasonably be cured within the 45-day cure period. Prior to the expiration of the 45-day cure period, CITY may submit a written request for additional time to cure the Event of Default upon a showing that CITY has commenced its efforts to cure the Event of Default and that the Event of Default cannot be reasonably cured within the 45-day cure period. The foregoing notwithstanding, an Event of Default dealing with CITY’s failure to timely pay any undisputed sums to CONSULTANT as 64 April 11, 2023
provided under Section 1.5, above, will be cured by CITY within five (5) calendar days from the date of CONSULTANT’s Default Notice to CITY.

D. CITY, in its sole and absolute discretion, may also immediately suspend CONSULTANT’s performance under this Agreement pending
CONSULTANT’s cure of any Event of Default by giving CONSULTANT written notice of CITY’s intent to suspend CONSULTANT’s performance (hereinafter, a “Suspension Notice”). CITY may issue the Suspension Notice at any time upon the occurrence of an Event of Default. Upon such suspension, CONSULTANT will be compensated only for those services and tasks which have been rendered by CONSULTANT to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY up to the effective date of the suspension. No actual or asserted breach of this Agreement on the part of CITY will operate to prohibit or otherwise restrict CITY’s ability to suspend this Agreement as provided herein.

E. No waiver of any Event of Default or breach under this Agreement will constitute a waiver of any other or subsequent Event of Default or breach.

No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party will give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.

F. The duties and obligations imposed under this Agreement and the rights and remedies available hereunder will be in addition to and not a limitation of any duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law. In addition to any other remedies available to CITY at law or under this Agreement in the event of any breach of this Agreement, CITY, in its sole and absolute discretion, may also pursue any one or more of the following remedies:
i. Upon written notice to CONSULTANT, the CITY may immediately terminate this Agreement in whole or in part;
ii. Upon written notice to CONSULTANT, the CITY may extend the time of performance;
iii. The CITY may proceed by appropriate court action to enforce the terms of the Agreement to recover damages for CONSULTANT’s breach of the Agreement or to terminate the Agreement; or
iv. The CITY may exercise any other available and lawful right or remedy.

CONSULTANT will be liable for all legal fees plus other costs and expenses that CITY incurs upon a breach of this Agreement or in the CITY’s exercise of its remedies under this Agreement.

G. In the event CITY is in breach of this Agreement, CONSULTANT’s sole remedy will be the suspension or termination of this Agreement and/or the recovery of any unpaid sums lawfully owed to CONSULTANT under this 65 April 11, 2023
Agreement for completed services and tasks.

5.3 SCOPE OF WAIVER: No waiver of any default or breach under this Agreement will constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant, warranty, agreement, term, condition, duty or requirement contained in this Agreement. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party will give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.

5.4 SURVIVING ARTICLES, SECTIONS AND PROVISIONS: The termination of this Agreement pursuant to any provision of this Article or by normal expiration of its term or any extension thereto will not operate to terminate any Article, Section or provision contained herein which provides that it will survive the termination or normal expiration of this Agreement.

VI.

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

6.1 DOCUMENTS & DATA; LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: All Documents and Data will be and remain the property of CITY without restriction or limitation upon their use or dissemination by CITY. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “Documents and Data” means and includes all reports, analyses, correspondence, plans, designs, notes, summaries, strategies, charts, schedules, spreadsheets, calculations, lists, data compilations, documents or other materials developed and/or assembled by or on behalf of CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement and fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to Documents and Data stored digitally, magnetically and/or electronically. This Agreement creates, at no cost to CITY, a perpetual license for CITY to copy, use, reuse, disseminate and/or retain any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in all Documents and Data. CONSULTANT will require all subcontractors and subconsultants working on behalf of CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement to agree in writing that CITY will be granted the same right to copy, use, reuse, disseminate and retain Documents and Data prepared or assembled by any subcontractor or subconsultant as applies to Documents and Data prepared by CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement.

6.2 CONFIDENTIALITY: All data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by CONSULTANT or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and will not be disclosed by CONSULTANT without prior written consent by CITY. CITY will grant such consent of disclosure as legally required. Upon request, all CITY data will be returned to CITY upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement. CONSULTANT will not use CITY’s name or insignia, photographs, or any publicity pertaining to the Work in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of CITY.

6.3 FALSE CLAIMS ACT: CONSULTANT warrants and represents that neither CONSULTANT nor any person who is an officer of, in a managing position with, or 66 April 11, 2023
has an ownership interest in CONSULTANT has been determined by a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction to have violated the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C., Section 3789 et seq. and the California False Claims Act, Government Code Section 12650 et seq.

6.4 NOTICES: All notices permitted or required under this Agreement will be given to the respective Parties at the following addresses, or at such other address as the respective Parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

CONSULTANT: CITY:

AESI
42140 Tenth Street West
Lancaster, CA 93534
Attn: Brian D. Glidden
Phone: (661) 940-0043
City of California City
21000 Hacienda Blvd.

California City, CA 93505
Attn: City Manager
Phone: (760) 373-7170
Such notices will be deemed effective when personally delivered or successfully transmitted by facsimile as evidenced by a fax confirmation slip or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit with the United States Postal Service, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the Party at its applicable address.

6.5 COOPERATION; FURTHER ACTS: The Parties will fully cooperate with one another, and will take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as are reasonably necessary, appropriate or convenient to achieve the purposes of this Agreement.

6.6 SUBCONTRACTING: CONSULTANT will not subcontract any portion of the Work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without the prior written approval of CITY. Subcontracts (including without limitation subcontracts with subconsultants), if any, will contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement, including provisions relating to insurance requirements and indemnification.

6.7 CITY’S RIGHT TO EMPLOY OTHER CONSULTANTS: CITY reserves the right to employ other contractors in connection with the various projects worked upon by CONSULTANT.

6.8 PROHIBITED INTERESTS: CONSULTANT warrants, represents and maintains that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants and represents that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, CITY will have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of CITY, during the term of his or her service with CITY, will have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or 67 April 11, 2023
anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

6.9 TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

6.10 GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE: This Agreement will be interpreted and governed according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the Parties, venue, without exception, will be in the Kern County Superior Court of the State of California. If, and only if, applicable law requires that all or part of any such litigation be tried exclusively in federal court, venue, without exception, will be in the Eastern District of California located in the City of Bakersfield, California.

6.11 ATTORNEYS’ FEES: If either Party commences an action against the other Party, legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such litigation will be entitled to have and recover from the losing Party reasonable attorneys’ fees and all other costs of such action.

6.12 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: This Agreement will be binding on the successors and assigns of the Parties.

6.13 NO THIRD-PARTY BENEFIT: There are no intended third-party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. All rights and benefits under this Agreement inure exclusively to the Parties.

6.14 CONSTRUCTION OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement will not be construed in favor of, or against, either Party but will be construed as if the Parties prepared this Agreement together through a process of negotiation and with the advice of their respective attorneys.

6.15 SEVERABILITY: If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions will continue in full force and effect.

6.16 AMENDMENT; MODIFICATION: No amendment, modification or supplement of this Agreement will be valid or binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties, subject to CITY approval. The requirement for written amendments, modifications or supplements cannot be waived and any attempted waiver will be void and invalid.

6.17 CAPTIONS: The captions of the various articles, sections and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.

6.18 INCONSISTENCIES OR CONFLICTS: In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and any of the exhibits attached hereto, the provisions of this Agreement will control. 68 April 11, 2023

6.19 ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement, including all attached exhibits, constitutes the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the Parties with respect to the matters addressed herein and supersedes all other agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, which may have been entered into between CITY and CONSULTANT prior to the execution of this Agreement. Any statements, representations, or other agreements, whether oral or written, made by either Party that is not embodied herein will not be valid or binding on the Parties. No amendment, modification or supplement to this Agreement will be valid and binding unless in writing and duly executed by the Parties pursuant to Section

6.16, above.

6.20 COUNTERPARTS: This Agreement will be executed in three (3) original counterparts each of which will be of equal force and effect. No handwritten or typewritten amendment, modification or supplement to any one counterpart will be valid or binding unless made to all three counterparts in conformity with Section

6.16, above. One fully executed original counterpart will be delivered to CONSULTANT and the remaining two original counterparts will be retained by CITY.
(SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE)
69 April 11, 2023
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first appearing in this Agreement, above.

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY:

By:

Inge Elmes, Acting City Manager

Date:_______________________
AESI
By:

Name:

Title:

Date:_______________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: _____
City Attorney
Date:____________________________

70 April 11, 2023
EXHIBIT “A”

CONSULTANT PROPOSAL
71 April 11, 2023
Copyright AESI – Confidential
March 30, 2023 Job No. 22-7003-01
City of California City
Inge Elmes
Acting City Manager
21000 Hacienda Blvd.

California City, CA 93505
RE: CityWide GIS Projects Layer Development

CITYWIDE GIS PROJECTS DEVELOPMENT AS-NEEDED SERVICES
AMENDMENT #1
We are pleased to provide our proposal below to develop a City project layer for the GIS system.

This layer will graphically represent each project entered into the system. It will provide search and selection capabilities to locate the project graphically and to allow the user to bring up data that is associated with each project.

The long-term goal of this layer is to understand where each project is in the approval process and to help the City track projects. It will be a great planning tool since we can add so many layers of information to the GIS system. Currently the system has the City’s water system, but with this contract and following contracts it will allow planners, engineers, and managers to view parcels, water, sewer, zoning, etc. to help decisions and questions to be answered quicker and with less staff time and resources required.

The goal of the project layer is to tie as much information as possible to help the City manage projects and the related project data. It will also involve work between AESI and the City to determine what data will be stored and the development of checklists to aid staff with making sure all items are submitted for processing.

This is a robust goal and we will take small steps towards achieving the ultimate goal of the layer and system.

Project Assumptions
 The City will work on several check lists for submittals of project requirements. These checklists will be used to build data forms and a database to store the information.  Projects will be digitized by staff and assigned a project ID that will be used to track and search for information in the system. We will use a technique similar to what the City uses now like “SPR 21-15”. SPR stands for Site Plan Review and 21 the year and 15 the assigned sequential project number.
 Documents can be “attached” to projects in the system using a linking tool. This tool will allow almost any digital document to be tied to the project. 72 April 11, 2023
Project Layer for GIS Job No. 22-7003-01
March 30, 2023 Page 2
Copyright AESI – Confidential
 The system will be setup for internal staff to start with, but down the road some of the data could be provided to the public or developers to help them track or view their projects.  GIS Application is best viewed on a desktop or laptop device. Mobile device viewability varies per device (screen size, screen resolution, etc).

Project Description

AESI will develop a new City Project GIS layer that will be added to the City’s existing web GIS application developed by AESI under previous contract. AESI will also add Linked Documents functionality to the Projects layer and the ability to digitize projects within the map.

Deliverables
This project will provide both a GIS layer that can be updated through the web application to add project details and attach project documents. This system can also host other data layers in the future such as parcels, zoning, sewer, street lights or other data the City desires to have assimilated into the system.

Detailed Scope
Budget Items
The below scope items will be billed on an hourly basis.

Administration & Project Coordination 6,600
Meetings, Project Scoping, Demos, Discussion, with Planning Staff and Commissioners
5,280
Review City’s Application Checklists and Coordinate with City 3,960 Further Development of Project Tracking Web Application 5,200 Add Additional Application Checklists for City Projects / Applications 4,160 Develop City Projects Database 3,120
Develop City Projects GIS Layer TBD
Add Linked Documents Tool for Project Layer Report TBD
Collect GPS Data for Sewer Manholes 6,680
Training (Web Application) TBD
Estimated Budget Total $ 35,000
73 April 11, 2023
Project Layer for GIS Job No. 22-7003-01
March 30, 2023 Page 3
Copyright AESI – Confidential
Fee Schedule (Valid From: March 2023 – December 2023)
GPS Asset Location Technician (non-prevailing wage) $140.00/hr.

GIS Application Development $160.00/hr.

GIS Manager $165.00/hr.

GIS Technical Specialist $130.00/hr.

Professional Engineer $135.00/hr.

Associate Engineer $120.00/hr.

Jr. Engineer/EIT $120.00/hr.

Secretary/Administrative Assistant $55.00/hr.

Professional Surveyor - Office $130.00/hr.

Reimbursable Items
Plots & Scans $20 to 40/ea.

Travel $0.55/mi.

Terms of Payment
To commence with the project, Arrow Engineering Services will require a signed contract and notice to proceed. Progress billing will be made on a monthly basis with payment due within 30 days.

Any documents required by your accounting department i.e. W-9, insurance requirements, certified payroll, etc. need to be forwarded to us to aid in the billing process.

Our hourly rate fee schedule is subject to change and if an update is made, you will be notified.

Updated rates will be effective 30 calendar days after notification. This will only affect additional scope and hourly items.

Arrow Engineering is prepared to commence work immediately. If you would like us to proceed with the project, please sign and fax or e-mail this proposal along with the required retainer and the Project Information form. The proposal and fee amount is valid from 30 days of proposal date.

Should Arrow Engineering pursue litigation or arbitration for the enforcement of interpretation of this agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation or arbitration shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney’s fees.

Termination – The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be terminated by either party upon 7 days written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms thereof through no fault of the terminating party, or upon 30 days written notice for the convenience of the terminating party. If any change occurs in the ownership of the Client, the Consultant shall have the right to immediately terminate this Agreement. In the event of any termination, the Consultant shall be paid for all services rendered and expenses incurred to the effective date of termination, and other reasonable expenses incurred by the Consultant as a result of such termination. If the Consultants compensation is a fixed fee, the amount payable for services will be a proportional amount of the total fee based on the ratio of the amount of the services performed, as reasonable determined by the Consultant, to the total amount of services which were to have been performed. 74 April 11, 2023
Project Layer for GIS Job No. 22-7003-01
March 30, 2023 Page 4
Copyright AESI – Confidential
Right To Rely - Arrow Engineering shall be entitled to rely on, and shall not be responsible for, the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of services and information furnished by the Owner and Owner’s consultants.

Equitable Adjustment - If the Client suspends the Project, Arrow Engineering shall be compensated for services performed prior to notice of such suspension. When the Project is resumed, Arrow Engineering shall be compensated for expenses incurred in the interruption and resumption Arrow Engineering’s services. Arrow Engineering fees for the remaining services and the time schedules shall be equitably adjusted.

The drawings, specifications and other documents prepared by the Engineer/Surveyor for this project are instruments of the service for use solely with respect to this project. The Engineer/Surveyor’s drawing(s) or other documents shall not be used by the owner or others on other projects, except by agreement in writing with appropriate compensation to the Engineer.

Neither the owner nor the Engineer/Surveyor can assign this agreement to a third party without the written consent of the other. All computer files remain the sole property of the engineer.

In the event the Client uses the Instruments of Service without retaining the authors of the Instruments of Service, the Owner releases Arrow Engineering and Arrow Engineering consultant(s) from all claims and causes of action arising from such uses. The Client, to the extent permitted by law, further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Arrow Engineering and its consultant(s) from all costs and expenses, including the cost of defense, related to claims and causes of action asserted by any third person or entity to the extent such costs and expenses arise from the Client’s use of the Instruments of Service under this Section.

If you have any questions or wish to discuss the project, we will be happy to meet with you at your earliest convenience.

Registered Civil Engineer No. 48287
Licensed Surveyor No. 7727
Sincerely,
Brian D. Glidden, P.E., L.S.

BDG
75 April 11, 2023
TO:

FROM:

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 11, 2023
Mayor and City Council
Amador Meza, Chief Water Operator
SUBJECT: Distribution Operator II Positions for Water Department ITEM NO. CC 3.

BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION: The above positions were originally requested at the March 2, 2023, special council meeting. They were also included in the FY 22/23 budget that was approved and adopted by Council on March 14, 2023. When presented at the March 28, 2023, Council meeting for approval for recruitment/hire, Council asked staff to bring them back.

This staff report is to fulfill that request with additional information that was not included in the March 28th staff report. The Distribution Operator 2 (002) salaries are already included/accounted for in the FY 22/23 approved/adopted budget.

In the previous year's budget, there were a total of 13 Maintenance Worker 1 (MW1) positions in the water department under the Chief Water Operator.

As positions became vacant during the previous FY, they were not recruited for/filled. This left the water dept. with 3 vacant MW1 positions that were eliminated in the FY 22/23 budget to make room for the addition of the 3, needed 002 positions. The salary difference has been accounted for in the Water Enterprise Fund that was part of the approved/adopted FY 22/23 budget. The FY 22/23 overall water budget reflected a surplus even with these 3 positions added to replace the 3, eliminated MW1 positions.

The water dept. needs employees that hold a water operator's license for multiple reasons.

Therefore, we essentially are "replacing" the 3 eliminated MW1 positions for the 3 002 positions requested.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Already included in the approved and adopted 22/23 FY Budget.

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council authorize the positions as requested in the approved & adopted 22/23 FY Budget.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Job Description for 002

2. Salary Schedule for MW1 and 002
76 April 11, 2023
77 April 11, 2023
78 April 11, 2023
79 April 11, 2023
80 April 11, 2023
81 April 11, 2023
82 April 11, 2023
83 April 11, 2023
84 April 11, 2023
85 April 11, 2023
86 April 11, 2023
87 April 11, 2023
88 April 11, 2023
89 April 11, 2023
90 April 11, 2023
91 April 11, 2023
92 April 11, 2023

CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 11, 2023
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Inge Elmes, Interim City Manager
PREPARED BY: City Attorney’s Office
SUBJECT: Adoption of Proposed Resolution No. 03-23-2972 , Authorizing the City to Enter Into Five Nationwide Opioids Litigation Settlement Agreements with Walmart, CVS, Walgreens, Teva, and Allergan
_____________________________________________________________________________________

BACKGROUND
Staff recommends that the City Council consider and approve Resolution No. 03-23-2972 authorizing the City to enter into five nationwide opioids litigation settlement agreements with Teva, Allergan, CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart, agree to the terms of the related State-Subdivision agreements, and authorize entry into the related State-Subdivision agreements with the Attorney General.

Since 2017, state and local governments in California and around the United States have pursued litigation against certain manufacturers, distributors, and retailers of opioid pharmaceuticals to hold them financially responsible for the opioid epidemic’s local impacts. These national litigation matters are and were being handled as a multi-district litigation matter in federal court.

Nationwide settlements were previously reached totaling $26 billion with various opioids manufacturers and distributors including McKesson, AmerisourceBergen, Cardinal Health, and Jansen.

Retailers Settlements
Recently, tentative nationwide settlements were announced with pharmaceutical manufacturers Teva and Allergan, and retailers/pharmacies CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart. These settlements allow for nonlitigating public entities to join in the settlements in exchange for a release against these parties. Cities have until April 18, 2023 to enter into these settlements.

The five settlements total approximately $20.2 billion, payable to states and local governments, and with payments spanning anywhere from three (3) to fifteen (15) years. The five settlement agreements each contain hundreds of pages and are online at www.oag.ca.gov/opioids.

Approximately $1.8 billion of the total settlement is intended for California, with seventy percent ($1.26 billion) targeted for local governmental entities. The funds intended for local governments are known as the “Abatement Fund.” Eligible cities that decline joining in these settlements will have their share of funds go to the State of California.

Cities can elect to have all or a portion of their settlement funds directed to the County, or the funds can be directed to the City for expenditure with restrictions, recordkeeping requirements, and State oversight. A CC 5.
93 April 11, 2023
city’s share allocated to a county is not required to be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city but will instead become part of that county’s share of the Abatement Fund.

Settlement funds must be spent on opioid remediation and comply with certain conditions and restrictions.

At least half of the funds must be spent on what are called “high impact abatement activities” as identified in the California State Subdivision Agreements, which delineate how opioid settlement funds can be spent.

The five high impact abatement activities are listed as follows:
- Provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program; - Creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder (SUD) treatment infrastructure; - Addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD;
- Diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and unsworn) and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability, restorative justice, and harm reduction; and/or
- Interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth.

City Settlement Funds
It is currently unknown exactly how much the City of California City could receive from these five combined settlement agreements. Additionally, it is currently unknown when the settlement administrator will commence settlement fund payments to local governments. However, as settlement funds have previously been distributed to California cities under the Distributors and Jansen settlements, settlement payments are expected to commence more expeditiously.

Each California city is allocated a percentage of the approximately $1.26 billion Abatement Fund. These percentages are set forth in Appendix 1 of each of the State-Subdivision Agreements. The City’s share of the California Abatement Fund is anticipated to be a product of the Abatement Fund total multiplied by the City’s percentage.

Appendix 1 identifies the City’s Abatement Percentage as 0.009 percent. Thus, a rough, calculation results in a very approximate, total payout figure of $113,400.00 to the City. However, staff cautions that this unofficial figure is most likely subject to change, and should not be relied on for official purposes.

RECOMMENDATION
The City Council’s adoption of Resolution No. 03-23-2972 and entering into the agreements will result in increased financial resources to battle the opioid epidemic’s local impacts.

As such, staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 03-23-2972, authorizing the City to release the five settling defendants in exchange for the consideration set forth in the Subdivision Participation Forms and California State-Subdivision Agreements, and authorize City staff to take the following measures:
94 April 11, 2023

1. The execution of the Subdivision Participation Forms for each of the five settlements (Teva, Allergan, CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart) and any and all documents ancillary thereto.

2. The execution of the proposed California State-Subdivision Agreements for each of the five settlements (Teva, Allergan, CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart) and any and all documents ancillary thereto.

FISCAL IMPACT
If approved, the City will become eligible to receive funds for opioid abatement purposes, in an amount to be determined.

ATTACHMENTS:

A. Proposed Resolution No. 03-23-2972.

B. Subdivision and Special District Settlement Participation Form – Allergan Settlement C. Subdivision and Special District Settlement Participation Form – Teva Settlement D. Subdivision and Special District Settlement Participation Form – CVS Settlement E. Subdivision and Special District Settlement Participation Form – Walgreens Settlement F. Subdivision and Special District Settlement Participation Form – Walmart Settlement G. Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Allergan Settlement
H. Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Teva Settlement
I. Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – CVS Settlement
J. Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Walgreens Settlement
K. Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Walmart Settlement
95 April 11, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. 03-23-2972

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF CALIFORNIA CITY, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO ENTER INTO

THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS WITH WALGREENS,

TEVA, ALLERGAN, CVS, AND WALMART, AGREE TO

THE TERMS OF THE RELATED STATE-SUBDIVISION

AGREEMENTS, AND AUTHORIZE ENTRY INTO THE

RELATED STATE-SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS WITH

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
WHEREAS, the United States is facing an ongoing public health crisis of opioid abuse, addiction, overdose, and death, forcing the State of California and California counties and cities to spend billions of dollars each year to address the direct consequences of this crisis; and
WHEREAS, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio is a multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) being pursued by numerous public entity plaintiffs against the manufacturers and distributors of various opioids based on the allegation that the defendants’ unlawful conduct caused the opioid epidemic; and WHEREAS on or about November 14, 2022, a proposed nationwide tentative settlement was reached between the plaintiffs in the MDL and Walmart Inc. (“Walmart”); and
WHEREAS on or about November 22, 2022, a proposed nationwide tentative settlement was reached between the plaintiffs in the MDL and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and all of its respective past and present direct or indirect parents, subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates, joint ventures, predecessors, successors, assigns, including but not limited to Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Actavis LLC (f/k/a Actavis Inc.), Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Actavis Kadian LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. (f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc.), Actavis Kadian LLC, Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. (f/k/a Watson Laboratories, Inc. – Utah), Actavis Mid Atlantic LLC, Actavis Totowa LLC, Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. (f/k/a Watson Laboratories, Inc. – Florida), Actavis South Atlantic LLC, Warner Chilcott Company LLC, and Watson Laboratories, Inc., and Anda Inc. (collectively, “Teva”); and
WHEREAS on or about November 22, 2022, a proposed nationwide tentative settlement was reached between the plaintiffs in the MDL and Allergan Finance, LLC (f/k/a Actavis, Inc., which in turn was f/k/a Watson Pharmaceutics, Inc.) and Allergan Limited (f/k/a Allergan plc, which, in turn, was f/k/a Actavis plc) (collectively, “Allergan”); and
WHEREAS, on or about December 9, 2022, a proposed nationwide tentative settlement was reached between the plaintiffs in the MDL and CVS Health Corporation 96 April 11, 2023
and CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and all of their past and present direct and indirect parent and subsidiaries (collectively, “CVS”); and
WHEREAS, on or about December 9, 2022, a proposed nationwide tentative settlement was reached between the plaintiffs in the MDL and Walgreen Co. (“Walgreens”); and
WHEREAS, CVS, Teva, Walgreens, Walmart, and Allergan shall be referred in this Resolution as “Settling Defendants”; and
WHEREAS, as part of the settlements with the Settling Defendants, local subdivisions, including certain cities, that are not plaintiffs in the MDL may participate in the settlements in exchange for a release of the Settling Defendants; and WHEREAS, copies of the proposed terms of those proposed nationwide settlements have been set forth in the Master Settlement Agreements with the Settling Defendants; and
WHEREAS, copies of the Master Settlement Agreements have been provided to the City Council with this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreements provide, among other things, for the payment of a certain sum to settling government entities in California including to the State of California and Participating Subdivisions upon occurrence of certain events as defined in the Settlement Agreements (“California Opioid Funds”); and WHEREAS, California local governments in the MDL have engaged in extensive discussions with the State Attorney General’s Office (“AGO”) as to how the California Opioid Funds will be allocated, which has resulted in the Proposed California StateSubdivision Agreements Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds (“Allocation Agreements”) from the settlements with the Settling Defendants; and WHEREAS, copies of the Allocation Agreements for all of the settlements with the Settling Defendants have been provided with this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Allocation Agreements allocate the California Opioid Funds as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the Settlements shall be combined pursuant to the Allocation Agreements, and 15% of total from each settlement shall be allocated to the State of California (the “State of California Allocation”), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund (“CA Abatement Accounts Fund”), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund (“CA Subdivision Fund”); and WHEREAS, under the Master Settlement Agreements, certain local subdivisions that did not file a lawsuit against the Settlement Defendants may qualify to participate in the settlements and obtain funds from the Abatement Account Fund; and 97 April 11, 2023
WHEREAS, the City is eligible to participate in the Settlement and become a CA Participating Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund (the 70% allocation) will be allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision (those above 10,000 in population). The percentage from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in Appendix 1 to the Allocation Agreements and provided to the City Council with this Resolution. The City’s share of the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be a product of the total in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund multiplied by the City’s percentage set forth in Appendix 1 of the Allocation Agreements (the “Local Allocation”); and
WHEREAS, a CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which the city is located, unless the city elects to take a direct election of the settlement funds, so long as: (a) the county is a CA Participating Subdivision, and (b) the city has not advised the Settlement Fund Administrator that it requests direct payment at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date; and
WHEREAS, it the intent of this Resolution to authorize the City to enter into the Master Settlement Agreements with the Settling Defendants by executing the Participation Agreements and to enter into the Allocation Agreements by executing the signature pages to those agreements.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: the City Council hereby approves and authorizes Acting City Manager Inge Elmes to settle and release the City’s claims against the Settling Defendants in exchange for the consideration set forth in the Settlement Agreements, Allocation Agreements and all exhibits thereto.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all actions heretofore taken by the City Council and other appropriate public officers and agents of the City with respect to the matters contemplated under this Resolution are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of April, 2023.

THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY
_____________________________
Kelly Kulikoff, Mayor
98 April 11, 2023
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
______________________________ ________________________________ Victor Ponto Socorro Chavez
City Attorney City Clerk

99 April 11, 2023

EXHIBIT K
Subdivision and Special District Settlement Participation Form Will your subdivision or special district be signing the settlement participation forms for the Allergan and Teva Settlements at this time?
[ ] Yes_ta [ ] No_ta
Governmental Entity: California City city State: CA
Authorized Signatory: /officialname_teva_allergan/
Address 1: /address1_teva_allergan/
Address 2: /address2_teva_allergan/
City, State, Zip: /cit_ta/ /state_ta/ /zi_ta/
Phone: /phone_teva_allergan/
Email: /email_teva_allergan/
The governmental entity identified above (“Governmental Entity”), in order to obtain and in consideration for the benefits provided to the Governmental Entity pursuant to the Agreement dated November 22, 2022 (“Allergan Settlement”), and acting through the undersigned authorized official, hereby elects to participate in the Allergan Settlement, release all Released Claims against all Released Entities, and agrees as follows.

1. The Governmental Entity is aware of and has reviewed the Allergan Settlement, understands that all terms in this Election and Release have the meanings defined therein, and agrees that by this Election, the Governmental Entity elects to participate in the Allergan Settlement as provided therein.

2. Following the execution of this Settlement Participation Form, the Governmental Entity shall comply with Section III.B of the Allergan Settlement regarding Cessation of Litigation Activities.

3. The Governmental Entity shall, within fourteen (14) days of the Reference Date and prior to the filing of the Consent Judgment, file a request to dismiss with prejudice any Released Claims that it has filed. With respect to any Released Claims pending in In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804, the Governmental Entity authorizes the MDL Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee to execute and file on behalf of the Governmental Entity a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice substantially in the form found at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com.

4. The Governmental Entity agrees to the terms of the Allergan Settlement pertaining to Subdivisions and Special Districts as defined therein.

5. By agreeing to the terms of the Allergan Settlement and becoming a Releasor, the Governmental Entity is entitled to the benefits provided therein, including, if applicable, monetary payments beginning after the Effective Date.

6. The Governmental Entity agrees to use any monies it receives through the Allergan Settlement solely for the purposes provided therein.
1 DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 Inge Elmes
21000 Hacienda Blvd.

California City, CA 93505
760-373-8661
[email protected]
100 April 11, 2023

7. The Governmental Entity submits to the jurisdiction of the court in the Governmental Entity’s state where the Consent Judgment is filed for purposes limited to that court’s role as provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent provided in, the Allergan Settlement.

8. The Governmental Entity has the right to enforce the Allergan Settlement as provided therein.

9. The Governmental Entity, as a Participating Subdivision or Participating Special District, hereby becomes a Releasor for all purposes in the Allergan Settlement, including, but not limited to, all provisions of Section V (Release), and along with all departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, Subdivisions, districts, instrumentalities of any kind and attorneys, and any person in their official capacity whether elected or appointed to serve any of the foregoing and any agency, person, or other entity claiming by or through any of the foregoing, and any other entity identified in the definition of Releasor, provides for a release to the fullest extent of its authority. As a Releasor, the Governmental Entity hereby absolutely, unconditionally, and irrevocably covenants not to bring, file, or claim, or to cause, assist in bringing, or permit to be brought, filed, or claimed, or to otherwise seek to establish liability for any Released Claims against any Released Entity in any forum whatsoever. The releases provided for in the Allergan Settlement are intended to be broad and shall be interpreted so as to give the Released Entities the broadest possible bar against any liability relating in any way to Released Claims and extend to the full extent of the power of the Governmental Entity to release claims. The Allergan Settlement shall be a complete bar to any Released Claim.

10. The Governmental Entity hereby takes on all rights and obligations of a Participating Subdivision or Participating Special District as set forth in the Allergan Settlement.

11. In connection with the releases provided for in the Allergan Settlement, each Governmental Entity expressly waives, releases, and forever discharges any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States or other jurisdiction, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to § 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads:

General Release; extent. A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.

A Releasor may hereafter discover facts other than or different from those which it knows, believes, or assumes to be true with respect to the Released Claims, but each Governmental Entity hereby expressly waives and fully, finally, and forever settles, releases and discharges, upon the Effective Date, any and all Released Claims that may exist as of such date but which Releasors do not know or suspect to exist, whether through ignorance, oversight, error, negligence or through no fault whatsoever, and which, if known, would materially affect the Governmental Entities’ decision to participate in the Allergan Settlement.

12. Nothing herein is intended to modify in any way the terms of the Allergan Settlement, to which the Governmental Entity hereby agrees. To the extent this Settlement Participation Form is interpreted differently from the Allergan Settlement in any respect, the Allergan Settlement controls.
2 DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 101 April 11, 2023
I have all necessary power and authorization to execute this Settlement Participation Form on behalf of the Governmental Entity.

Signature: /signer_1_teva_allergan/
Name: /name_1_teva_allergan/
Title: /title_1_teva_allergan/
Date: /date_1_teva_allergan/
3 DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 Inge Elmes
City Manager
April 11, 2023
102 April 11, 2023
Exhibit K
Subdivision and Special District Settlement Participation Form Governmental Entity: California City city State: CA
Authorized Signatory: /officialname_teva_allergan/
Address 1: /address1_teva_allergan/
Address 2: /address2_teva_allergan/
City, State, Zip: /cit_ta/ /state_ta/ /zi_ta/
Phone: /phone_teva_allergan/
Email: /email_teva_allergan/
The governmental entity identified above (“Governmental Entity”), in order to obtain and in consideration for the benefits provided to the Governmental Entity pursuant to the Agreement dated November 22, 2022 (“Teva Settlement”), and acting through the undersigned authorized official, hereby elects to participate in the Teva Settlement, release all Released Claims against all Released Entities, and agrees as follows.

1. The Governmental Entity is aware of and has reviewed the Teva Settlement, understands that all terms in this Election and Release have the meanings defined therein, and agrees that by this Election, the Governmental Entity elects to participate in the Teva Settlement as provided therein.

2. Following the execution of this Settlement Participation Form, the Governmental Entity shall comply with Section III.B of the Teva Settlement regarding Cessation of Litigation Activities.

3. The Governmental Entity shall, within 14 days of the Reference Date and prior to the filing of the Consent Judgment, file a request to dismiss with prejudice any Released Claims that it has filed. With respect to any Released Claims pending in In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804, the Governmental Entity authorizes the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee to execute and file on behalf of the Governmental Entity a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice substantially in the form found at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com.

4. The Governmental Entity agrees to the terms of the Teva Settlement pertaining to Subdivisions as defined therein.

5. By agreeing to the terms of the Teva Settlement and becoming a Releasor, the Governmental Entity is entitled to the benefits provided therein, including, if applicable, monetary payments beginning after the Effective Date.

6. The Governmental Entity agrees to use any monies it receives through the Teva Settlement solely for the purposes provided therein.

California City, CA 93505
760-373-8661
[email protected]
103 April 11, 2023

8. The Governmental Entity has the right to enforce the Teva Settlement as provided therein.

9. The Governmental Entity, as a Participating Subdivision or Participating Special District, hereby becomes a Releasor for all purposes in the Teva Settlement, including but not limited to all provisions of Section V (Release), and along with all departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, districts, instrumentalities of any kind and attorneys, and any person in their official capacity elected or appointed to serve any of the foregoing and any agency, person, or other entity claiming by or through any of the foregoing, and any other entity identified in the definition of Releasor, provides for a release to the fullest extent of its authority. As a Releasor, the Governmental Entity hereby absolutely, unconditionally, and irrevocably covenants not to bring, file, or claim, or to cause, assist or permit to be brought, filed, or claimed, or to otherwise seek to establish liability for any Released Claims against any Released Entity in any forum whatsoever. The releases provided for in the Teva Settlement are intended by Released Entitles and the Governmental Entity to be broad and shall be interpreted so as to give the Released Entities the broadest possible bar against any liability relating in any way to Released Claims and extend to the full extent of the power of the Governmental Entity to release claims. The Teva Settlement shall be a complete bar to any Released Claim.

10. The Governmental Entity hereby takes on all rights and obligations of a Participating Subdivision or Participating Special District as set forth in the Teva Settlement.

11. In connection with the releases provided for in the Teva Settlement, each Governmental Entity expressly waives, releases, and forever discharges any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States or other jurisdiction, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to § 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads:

12. Nothing herein is intended to modify in any way the terms of the Teva Settlement, to which Governmental Entity hereby agrees. To the extent this Election and Release is interpreted differently from the Teva Settlement in any respect, the Teva Settlement controls. 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 104 April 11, 2023
I have all necessary power and authorization to execute this Election and Release on behalf of the Governmental Entity.

EXHIBIT K
Subdivision Participation and Release Form
Will your subdivision or special district be signing the settlement participation form for the CVS Settlement at this time?
[ ] Yes_cv [ ] No_cv
Governmental Entity: California City city State: CA
Authorized Signatory: /officialname_cvs/
Address 1: /address1_cvs/
Address 2: /address2_cvs/
City, State, Zip: /cit_cv/ /state_cv/ /zi_cv/
Phone: /phone_cvs/
Email: /email_cvs/
The governmental entity identified above (“Governmental Entity”), in order to obtain and in consideration for the benefits provided to the Governmental Entity pursuant to the Settlement Agreement dated December 9, 2022 (“CVS Settlement”), and acting through the undersigned authorized official, hereby elects to participate in the CVS Settlement, release all Released Claims against all Released Entities, and agrees as follows.

1. The Governmental Entity is aware of and has reviewed the CVS Settlement, understands that all terms in this Participation and Release Form have the meanings defined therein, and agrees that by executing this Participation and Release Form, the Governmental Entity elects to participate in the CVS Settlement and become a Participating Subdivision as provided therein.

2. The Governmental Entity shall promptly, and in any event no later than 14 days after the Reference Date and prior to the filing of the Consent Judgment, dismiss with prejudice any Released Claims that it has filed. With respect to any Released Claims pending in In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804, the Governmental Entity authorizes the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee to execute and file on behalf of the Governmental Entity a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice substantially in the form found at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com.

3. The Governmental Entity agrees to the terms of the CVS Settlement pertaining to Participating Subdivisions as defined therein.

4. By agreeing to the terms of the CVS Settlement and becoming a Releasor, the Governmental Entity is entitled to the benefits provided therein, including, if applicable, monetary payments beginning after the Effective Date.

5. The Governmental Entity agrees to use any monies it receives through the CVS Settlement solely for the purposes provided therein.
1 DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 Inge Elmes
21000 Hacienda Blvd.

California City, CA 93505
760-373-8661
[email protected]
106 April 11, 2023

6. The Governmental Entity submits to the jurisdiction of the court in the Governmental Entity’s state where the Consent Judgment is filed for purposes limited to that court’s role as provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent provided in, the CVS Settlement. The Governmental Entity likewise agrees to arbitrate before the National Arbitration Panel as provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent otherwise provided in, the CVS Settlement.

7. The Governmental Entity has the right to enforce the CVS Settlement as provided therein.

8. The Governmental Entity, as a Participating Subdivision, hereby becomes a Releasor for all purposes in the CVS Settlement, including without limitation all provisions of Section XI (Release), and along with all departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, districts, instrumentalities of any kind and attorneys, and any person in their official capacity elected or appointed to serve any of the foregoing and any agency, person, or other entity claiming by or through any of the foregoing, and any other entity identified in the definition of Releasor, provides for a release to the fullest extent of its authority. As a Releasor, the Governmental Entity hereby absolutely, unconditionally, and irrevocably covenants not to bring, file, or claim, or to cause, assist or permit to be brought, filed, or claimed, or to otherwise seek to establish liability for any Released Claims against any Released Entity in any forum whatsoever. The releases provided for in the CVS Settlement are intended by the Parties to be broad and shall be interpreted so as to give the Released Entities the broadest possible bar against any liability relating in any way to Released Claims and extend to the full extent of the power of the Governmental Entity to release claims. The CVS Settlement shall be a complete bar to any Released Claim.

9. The Governmental Entity hereby takes on all rights and obligations of a Participating Subdivision as set forth in the CVS Settlement.

10. In connection with the releases provided for in the CVS Settlement, each Governmental Entity expressly waives, releases, and forever discharges any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States or other jurisdiction, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to § 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads:

General Release; extent. A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release that, if known by him or her would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.

11. Nothing herein is intended to modify in any way the terms of the CVS Settlement, to which Governmental Entity hereby agrees. To the extent this Participation and Release Form is interpreted differently from the CVS Settlement in any respect, the CVS Settlement controls.

I have all necessary power and authorization to execute this Participation and Release Form on behalf of the Governmental Entity.

Signature: /signer_1_cvs/
Name: /name_1_cvs/
Title: /title_1_cvs/
Date: /date_1_cvs/
3 DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 Inge Elmes
City Manager
April 11, 2023
108 April 11, 2023

EXHIBIT K
Subdivision Participation and Release Form
Will your subdivision or special district be signing the settlement participation form for the Walgreens Settlement at this time?
[ ] Yes_wg [ ] No_wg
Governmental Entity: California City city State: CA
Authorized Signatory: /officialname_walgreens/
Address 1: /address1_ walgreens/
Address 2: /address2_ walgreens/
City, State, Zip: /cit_wg/ /state_wg/ /zi_wg/
Phone: /phone_walgreens/
Email: /email_walgreens/
The governmental entity identified above (“Governmental Entity”), in order to obtain and in consideration for the benefits provided to the Governmental Entity pursuant to the Settlement Agreement dated December 9, 2022 (“Walgreens Settlement”), and acting through the undersigned authorized official, hereby elects to participate in the Walgreens Settlement, release all Released Claims against all Released Entities, and agrees as follows.

1. The Governmental Entity is aware of and has reviewed the Walgreens Settlement, understands that all terms in this Participation and Release Form have the meanings defined therein, and agrees that by executing this Participation and Release Form, the Governmental Entity elects to participate in the Walgreens Settlement and become a Participating Subdivision as provided therein.

3. The Governmental Entity agrees to the terms of the Walgreens Settlement pertaining to Participating Subdivisions as defined therein.

4. By agreeing to the terms of the Walgreens Settlement and becoming a Releasor, the Governmental Entity is entitled to the benefits provided therein, including, if applicable, monetary payments beginning after the Effective Date.

5. The Governmental Entity agrees to use any monies it receives through the Walgreens Settlement solely for the purposes provided therein.
1 DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 Inge Elmes
21000 Hacienda Blvd.

California City, CA 93505
760-373-8661
[email protected]
109 April 11, 2023

6. The Governmental Entity submits to the jurisdiction of the court in the Governmental Entity’s state where the Consent Judgment is filed for purposes limited to that court’s role as provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent provided in, the Walgreens Settlement. The Governmental Entity likewise agrees to arbitrate before the National Arbitration Panel as provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent otherwise provided in, the Walgreens Settlement.

7. The Governmental Entity has the right to enforce the Walgreens Settlement as provided therein.

8. The Governmental Entity, as a Participating Subdivision, hereby becomes a Releasor for all purposes in the Walgreens Settlement, including without limitation all provisions of Section XI (Release), and along with all departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, districts, instrumentalities of any kind and attorneys, and any person in their official capacity elected or appointed to serve any of the foregoing and any agency, person, or other entity claiming by or through any of the foregoing, and any other entity identified in the definition of Releasor, provides for a release to the fullest extent of its authority. As a Releasor, the Governmental Entity hereby absolutely, unconditionally, and irrevocably covenants not to bring, file, or claim, or to cause, assist or permit to be brought, filed, or claimed, or to otherwise seek to establish liability for any Released Claims against any Released Entity in any forum whatsoever. The releases provided for in the Walgreens Settlement are intended by the Parties to be broad and shall be interpreted so as to give the Released Entities the broadest possible bar against any liability relating in any way to Released Claims and extend to the full extent of the power of the Governmental Entity to release claims. The Walgreens Settlement shall be a complete bar to any Released Claim.

9. The Governmental Entity hereby takes on all rights and obligations of a Participating Subdivision as set forth in the Walgreens Settlement.

10. In connection with the releases provided for in the Walgreens Settlement, each Governmental Entity expressly waives, releases, and forever discharges any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States or other jurisdiction, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to § 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads:

General Release; extent. A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release that, if known by him or her would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.

11. Nothing herein is intended to modify in any way the terms of the Walgreens Settlement, to which Governmental Entity hereby agrees. To the extent this Participation and Release Form is interpreted differently from the Walgreens Settlement in any respect, the Walgreens Settlement controls.

I have all necessary power and authorization to execute this Participation and Release Form on behalf of the Governmental Entity.

Signature: /signer_1_walgreens/
Name: /name_1_walgreens/
Title: /title_1_walgreens/
Date: /date_1_walgreens/
3 DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 Inge Elmes
City Manager
April 11, 2023
111 April 11, 2023

EXHIBIT K
Subdivision Participation Form
Will your subdivision or special district be signing the settlement participation form for the Walmart Settlement at this time?
[ ] Yes_wm [ ] No_wm
Governmental Entity: California City city State: CA
Authorized Official: /officialname_walmart/
Address 1: /address1_walmart/
Address 2: /address2_walmart/
City, State, Zip: /cit_wm/ /state_wm/ /zi_wm/
Phone: /phone_walmart/
Email: /email_walmart/
The governmental entity identified above (“Governmental Entity”), in order to obtain and in consideration for the benefits provided to the Governmental Entity pursuant to the Settlement Agreement dated November 14, 2022 (“Walmart Settlement”), and acting through the undersigned authorized official, hereby elects to participate in the Walmart Settlement, release all Released Claims against all Released Entities, and agrees as follows.

1. The Governmental Entity is aware of and has reviewed the Walmart Settlement, understands that all terms in this Election and Release have the meanings defined therein, and agrees that by this Election, the Governmental Entity elects to participate in the Walmart Settlement and become a Participating Subdivision as provided therein.

2. The Governmental Entity shall promptly, and in any event within 14 days of the Effective Date and prior to the filing of the Consent Judgment, dismiss with prejudice any Released Claims that it has filed. With respect to any Released Claims pending in In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804, the Governmental Entity authorizes the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee to execute and file on behalf of the Governmental Entity a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice substantially in the form found at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/.

3. The Governmental Entity agrees to the terms of the Walmart Settlement pertaining to Subdivisions as defined therein.

4. By agreeing to the terms of the Walmart Settlement and becoming a Releasor, the Governmental Entity is entitled to the benefits provided therein, including, if applicable, monetary payments beginning after the Effective Date.

5. The Governmental Entity agrees to use any monies it receives through the Walmart Settlement solely for the purposes provided therein.
1 DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 Inge Elmes
21000 Hacienda Blvd.

California City, CA 93505
760-373-8661
[email protected]
112 April 11, 2023

7. The Governmental Entity has the right to enforce the Walmart Settlement as provided therein.

8. The Governmental Entity, as a Participating Subdivision, hereby becomes a Releasor for all purposes in the Walmart Settlement, including but not limited to all provisions of Section X (Release), and along with all departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, districts, instrumentalities of any kind and attorneys, and any person in their official capacity elected or appointed to serve any of the foregoing and any agency, person, or other entity claiming by or through any of the foregoing, and any other entity identified in the definition of Releasor, provides for a release to the fullest extent of its authority. As a Releasor, the Governmental Entity hereby absolutely, unconditionally, and irrevocably covenants not to bring, file, or claim, or to cause, assist or permit to be brought, filed, or claimed, or to otherwise seek to establish liability for any Released Claims against any Released Entity in any forum whatsoever. The releases provided for in the Walmart Settlement are intended by the Parties to be broad and shall be interpreted so as to give the Released Entities the broadest possible bar against any liability relating in any way to Released Claims and extend to the full extent of the power of the Governmental Entity to release claims. The Walmart Settlement shall be a complete bar to any Released Claim.

9. In connection with the releases provided for in the Walmart Settlement, each Governmental Entity expressly waives, releases, and forever discharges any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States or other jurisdiction, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to § 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads:

10. Nothing herein is intended to modify in any way the terms of the Walmart Settlement, to which Governmental Entity hereby agrees. To the extent this Election and Release is interpreted differently from the Walmart Settlement in any respect, the Walmart Settlement controls.
2 DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 113 April 11, 2023
I have all necessary power and authorization to execute this Election and Release on behalf of the Governmental Entity.

Signature: /signer_1_walmart/
Name: /name_1_walmart/
Title: /title_1_walmart/
Date: /date_1_walmart/
3 DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 Inge Elmes
City Manager
April 11, 2023
114 April 11, 2023
1 Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds – Allergan Settlement

1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Allergan Settlement Agreement, dated as of November 22, 2022, and any revision thereto (the “Allergan Settlement Agreement”), including Section VIII and Exhibit O, the State of California proposes this agreement (the “CA Allergan Allocation Agreement”) to govern the allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to Sections VI, VII, and VIII of the Allergan Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Sections XII or XIII of the Allergan Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA Allergan Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.1 Further, pursuant to Sections X.B and X.C of the Teva Settlement Agreement and Sections IX.B and IX.C of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, eligible Subdivisions must participate in both the Teva Settlement Agreement and Allergan Settlement Agreement, or neither.2

2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Subdivision with a population equal to or greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Allergan Settlement Agreement. b) Teva Settlement Agreement means the Teva Settlement Agreement dated November 22, 2022, and any revision thereto.
c) CVS Settlement Agreement means the CVS Settlement Agreement dated December 9, 2022, and any revision thereto as well as any modification thereto entered into by the State of California and CVS.
d) Distributor Settlement Agreement means the Distributor Settlement Agreement dated July 21, 2021, and any revision thereto.
e) Janssen Settlement Agreement means the Janssen Settlement Agreement dated July 21, 2021, and any revision thereto.
1 A parallel but separate agreement (the “CA Teva Allocation Agreement”) will govern the allocation, distribution, and use of settlement fund payments under the Teva Settlement Agreement.
2 However, if Teva enters bankruptcy prior to the Effective Date, an eligible Subdivision can choose to only join the Allergan Settlement Agreement.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 115 April 11, 2023
2 f) Walgreens Settlement Agreement means the Walgreens Settlement Agreement dated December 9, 2022, and any revision thereto.
g) Walmart Settlement Agreement means the Walmart Settlement Agreement dated November 14, 2022, and any revision thereto.
h) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in California. CA Litigating Special Districts include Downey Unified School District, Elk Grove Unified School District, Kern High School District, Montezuma Fire Protection District (located in Stockton, California), Santa Barbara San Luis Obispo Regional Health Authority, Inland Empire Health Plan, Health Plan of San Joaquin, San Leandro Unified School District, Pleasant Valley School District Board, and LA Care Health Plan.
i) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020. j) Opioid Defendant means any defendant (including but not limited to Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, and McKesson Corporation) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.

3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, as well as applicable law, and the Allergan Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of this CA Allergan Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Allergan Allocation Agreement have the same meaning as in the Allergan Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.

Pursuant to Section VIII(E)(1) of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section VIII(C) of the Allergan Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.

4. State Allocation
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 116 April 11, 2023
3 The Settlement Fund payments to California,3 pursuant to the Allergan Settlement Agreement, shall be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Allergan Allocation Agreement, and 15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the “State of California Allocation”), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund (“CA Abatement Accounts Fund”), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund (“CA Subdivision Fund”).

A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by the State for future Opioid Remediation.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 117 April 11, 2023
4 CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight).
d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share, with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA Allergan Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San Jose and Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become Participating Subdivisions.
e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Allergan Settlement Agreement and this CA Allergan Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must be transferred to the State. This provision shall not apply to the Cost Reimbursement Funds, which shall be controlled by Appendix 2.
ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to the Allergan Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program; (2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) treatment infrastructure; (3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non-sworn) and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability, restorative justice, and harm reduction; and/or
(5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 118 April 11, 2023
5 c) The California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”) may add to this list (but not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list. d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Allergan Settlement Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for Opioid Remediation consistent with the Allergan Settlement Agreement and this CA Allergan Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Allergan Settlement Agreement and this CA Allergan Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision’s use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Allergan Settlement Agreement or this CA Allergan Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern.
c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the Subdivision’s use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 119 April 11, 2023
6 enforce the requirements of the Allergan Settlement Agreement or this CA Allergan Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this agreement.
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits, investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal enforcement actions.

C. CA Subdivision Fund
i. Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used, subject to any limits imposed by the Allergan Settlement Agreement and this CA Allergan Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid-related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation, and to pay the reasonable fees and expenses of the Special Master as set forth in Appendix 2.

The CA Subdivision Funds will be allocated as follows:
a) First, funds in the CA Subdivision Fund shall be used to pay the Special Master’s reasonable fees and expenses in accordance with the procedures and limitations set forth in Appendix 2 to this document;
b) Second, funds will be allocated to Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions that have been awarded Costs, as defined by and in accordance with the procedures and limitations set forth in Appendix 2 to this document. c) Funds remaining in the CA Subdivision Fund, which shall consist of no less than 50% of the total CA Subdivision Fund received in any year pursuant to Appendix 2, Section 2.c.v, will be distributed to Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions, in relative proportion to the Local Allocation. These funds shall be used to fund future opioid-related projects and to reimburse past opioid-related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation against any Opioid Defendant.

D. Provision for State Back-Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) (“MDL Fees Order”) in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) “cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee agreements at 15%.” Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 120 April 11, 2023
7 contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the Teva Settlement Agreement and Allergan Settlement Agreement, and, if applicable, the CVS Settlement Agreement, Distributor Settlement Agreement, Janssen Settlement Agreement, Walgreens Settlement Agreement, and Walmart Settlement Agreement.

Before seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back-Stop Agreement, private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Allergan Settlement Agreement. Further, private counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

To effectuate a State Back-Stop Agreement pursuant to this section, an agreement in the form of Appendix 3 may be entered into by a Plaintiff Subdivision, private counsel, and the California Office of the Attorney General. The California Office of the Attorney General shall, upon the request of a Plaintiff Subdivision, execute any agreement executed by a Plaintiff Subdivision and its private counsel if it is in the form of Appendix 3. The California Office of the Attorney General will also consider requests from Plaintiff Subdivisions to execute and enter into agreements presented in other forms.

For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not require a Plaintiff Subdivision to request or enter into a State Back-Stop Agreement, and no State Back-Stop Agreement shall impose any duty or obligation on the State of California or any of its agencies or officers, including without limitation the Attorney General.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 121 April 11, 2023
8 c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions’ expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision. d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and expenditures, as required by the Allergan Settlement Agreement and this CA Allergan Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used, including if used to pay attorneys’ fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to Section VIII(C) of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, such information must also be reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Allergan. e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the State and Participating Subdivisions.

6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA Allergan Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Allergan Settlement Agreement, this CA Allergan Allocation Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Allergan Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d) Except as provided in the Allergan Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 122 April 11, 2023
9 The undersigned, California City city, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Allergan Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Allergan Settlement and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Allergan Settlement. EXECUTED on /date_1_teva_allergan/.

Signature: /signer_1_teva_allergan/
Name: /name_1_teva_allergan/
Title: /title_1_teva_allergan/
Date: /date_1_teva_allergan/
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 Inge Elmes
City Manager
April 11, 2023
123 April 11, 2023
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds—Allergan Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change. Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change.

Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” pursuant to Section 4.B.e., the State of California will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.

Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not an Initial Participating Subdivision, will be re-allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions.

Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the California Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.B. Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.C. Regarding the column herein entitled “Weighted Allocation Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to onehundred percent (100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 124 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
1 of 15
100.000% 100.000% 100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Alameda County Alameda 2.332% 2.853% 2.4237952%
City Alameda Alameda 0.069% 0.0570162%
City Albany Alameda 0.013% 0.0107768%
City Berkeley Alameda 0.152% 0.1249656%
City Dublin Alameda 0.033% 0.040% 0.0338810%
City Emeryville Alameda 0.023% 0.0185765%
City Fremont Alameda 0.108% 0.0888576%
City Hayward Alameda 0.117% 0.0966218%
City Livermore Alameda 0.054% 0.0446740%
City Newark Alameda 0.026% 0.0217626%
City Oakland Alameda 0.486% 0.595% 0.5055601%
City Piedmont Alameda 0.014% 0.0114064%
City Pleasanton Alameda 0.067% 0.0554547%
City San Leandro Alameda 0.039% 0.0321267%
City Union City Alameda 0.043% 0.0352484%
County Amador County Amador 0.226% 0.277% 0.2349885%
County Butte County Butte 1.615% 1.975% 1.6783178%
City Chico Butte 0.216% 0.264% 0.2246499%
City Oroville Butte 0.079% 0.0646595%
County Calaveras County Calaveras 0.226% 0.277% 0.2351644% County Colusa County Colusa 0.059% 0.0489221%
County Contra Costa County Contra Costa 2.102% 2.571% 2.1844585% City Antioch Contra Costa 0.037% 0.0301879%
City Brentwood Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0215339%
City Clayton Contra Costa 0.002% 0.0018060%
City Concord Contra Costa 0.055% 0.0456676%
City Danville Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0082255%
City El Cerrito Contra Costa 0.023% 0.0189024%
City Hercules Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0078273%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 125 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
2 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Lafayette Contra Costa 0.006% 0.0046030%
City Martinez Contra Costa 0.012% 0.0098593%
City Moraga Contra Costa 0.004% 0.0031007%
City Oakley Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0079416%
City Orinda Contra Costa 0.005% 0.0038157%
City Pinole Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0110909%
City Pittsburg Contra Costa 0.053% 0.0436369%
City Pleasant Hill Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0106309%
City Richmond Contra Costa 0.146% 0.1201444%
City San Pablo Contra Costa 0.018% 0.0148843%
City San Ramon Contra Costa 0.021% 0.0176459%
City Walnut Creek Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0212132%
County Del Norte County Del Norte 0.114% 0.140% 0.1189608% County El Dorado County El Dorado 0.768% 0.939% 0.7980034% City Placerville El Dorado 0.015% 0.0127642%
City South Lake Tahoe El Dorado 0.081% 0.0665456%
County Fresno County Fresno 1.895% 2.318% 1.9693410%
City Clovis Fresno 0.065% 0.0536211%
City Coalinga Fresno 0.012% 0.0098554%
City Fresno Fresno 0.397% 0.3270605%
City Kerman Fresno 0.005% 0.0042534%
City Kingsburg Fresno 0.008% 0.0066167%
City Mendota Fresno 0.002% 0.0019387%
City Orange Cove Fresno 0.004% 0.0035607%
City Parlier Fresno 0.008% 0.0069755%
City Reedley Fresno 0.012% 0.0098804%
City Sanger Fresno 0.018% 0.0146135%
City Selma Fresno 0.015% 0.0127537%
County Glenn County Glenn 0.107% 0.131% 0.1116978%
County Humboldt County Humboldt 1.030% 1.260% 1.0703185% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 126 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
3 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Arcata Humboldt 0.054% 0.0447660%
City Eureka Humboldt 0.117% 0.143% 0.1216284%
City Fortuna Humboldt 0.032% 0.0266837%
County Imperial County Imperial 0.258% 0.315% 0.2679006% City Brawley Imperial 0.011% 0.0087986%
City Calexico Imperial 0.019% 0.0152799%
City El Centro Imperial 0.158% 0.1302522%
City Imperial Imperial 0.006% 0.0048791%
County Inyo County Inyo 0.073% 0.089% 0.0754413%
County Kern County Kern 2.517% 3.079% 2.6159145%
City Arvin Kern 0.006% 0.0046425%
City Bakersfield Kern 0.212% 0.1747198%
City California City Kern 0.009% 0.0070820%
City Delano Kern 0.030% 0.0249316%
City McFarland Kern 0.003% 0.0025644%
City Ridgecrest Kern 0.015% 0.0120938%
City Shafter Kern 0.013% 0.0103417%
City Tehachapi Kern 0.009% 0.0073580%
City Wasco Kern 0.008% 0.0069861%
County Kings County Kings 0.293% 0.2413469%
City Avenal Kings 0.007% 0.0056335%
City Corcoran Kings 0.013% 0.0107032%
City Hanford Kings 0.027% 0.0226038%
City Lemoore Kings 0.016% 0.0131900%
County Lake County Lake 0.795% 0.6545389%
City Clearlake Lake 0.041% 0.050% 0.0426253%
City Lakeport Lake 0.021% 0.026% 0.0222964%
County Lassen County Lassen 0.319% 0.391% 0.3320610%
City Susanville Lassen 0.027% 0.0219295%
County Los Angeles County Los Angeles 13.896% 16.999% 14.4437559% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 127 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
4 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Agoura Hills Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040024%
City Alhambra Los Angeles 0.042% 0.0343309%
City Arcadia Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0267718%
City Artesia Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0005100%
City Azusa Los Angeles 0.026% 0.0210857%
City Baldwin Park Los Angeles 0.027% 0.0218520%
City Bell Los Angeles 0.008% 0.0068783%
City Bellflower Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0014485%
City Bell Gardens Los Angeles 0.014% 0.0114301%
City Beverly Hills Los Angeles 0.065% 0.0534897%
City Burbank Los Angeles 0.100% 0.0823132%
City Calabasas Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048948%
City Carson Los Angeles 0.019% 0.0159805%
City Cerritos Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039682%
City Claremont Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0082584%
City Commerce Los Angeles 0.000% 0.0002971%
City Compton Los Angeles 0.044% 0.0361882%
City Covina Los Angeles 0.028% 0.0229127%
City Cudahy Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006020%
City Culver City Los Angeles 0.055% 0.0449894%
City Diamond Bar Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006993%
City Downey Los Angeles 0.052% 0.0429994%
City Duarte Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0027261%
City El Monte Los Angeles 0.031% 0.038% 0.0318985%
City El Segundo Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0268020%
City Gardena Los Angeles 0.034% 0.0278088%
City Glendale Los Angeles 0.166% 0.1366586%
City Glendora Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134411%
City Hawaiian Gardens Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040549%
City Hawthorne Los Angeles 0.050% 0.0407833%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 128 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
5 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Hermosa Beach Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0145307%
City Huntington Park Los Angeles 0.023% 0.0190667%
City Inglewood Los Angeles 0.059% 0.0489195%
City La Cañada Flintridge Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0025565% City Lakewood Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039971%
City La Mirada Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0081572%
City Lancaster Los Angeles 0.045% 0.0369689%
City La Puente Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012999%
City La Verne Los Angeles 0.024% 0.0194190%
City Lawndale Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0017731%
City Lomita Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0031940%
City Long Beach Los Angeles 0.439% 0.3614151%
City Los Angeles Los Angeles 2.715% 3.321% 2.8218811%
City Lynwood Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134345%
City Malibu Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0019269%
City Manhattan Beach Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260686%
City Maywood Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0035528%
City Monrovia Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0254455%
City Montebello Los Angeles 0.030% 0.0250670%
City Monterey Park Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0256677%
City Norwalk Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0258228%
City Palmdale Los Angeles 0.046% 0.0375827%
City Palos Verdes Estates Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0053102% City Paramount Los Angeles 0.011% 0.0091483%
City Pasadena Los Angeles 0.146% 0.1200524%
City Pico Rivera Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0183333%
City Pomona Los Angeles 0.111% 0.0911933%
City Rancho Palos Verdes Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012645%
City Redondo Beach Los Angeles 0.062% 0.0506992%
City Rosemead Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0028260%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 129 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
6 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City San Dimas Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0022016%
City San Fernando Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0104837%
City San Gabriel Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0147726%
City San Marino Los Angeles 0.009% 0.0073791%
City Santa Clarita Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0178167%
City Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0257531%
City Santa Monica Los Angeles 0.158% 0.1298513%
City Sierra Madre Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048646%
City Signal Hill Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0084884%
City South El Monte Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039603%
City South Gate Los Angeles 0.020% 0.0166272%
City South Pasadena Los Angeles 0.012% 0.0095334%
City Temple City Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039498%
City Torrance Los Angeles 0.112% 0.0919820%
City Walnut Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0047305%
City West Covina Los Angeles 0.049% 0.0404521%
City West Hollywood Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0108517%
City Whittier Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260581%
County Madera County Madera 0.349% 0.427% 0.3630669%
City Chowchilla Madera 0.012% 0.0097332%
City Madera Madera 0.039% 0.0318441%
County Marin County Marin 0.564% 0.690% 0.5861325%
City Larkspur Marin 0.015% 0.0124697%
City Mill Valley Marin 0.020% 0.0168401%
City Novato Marin 0.028% 0.0229824%
City San Anselmo Marin 0.009% 0.0078062%
City San Rafael Marin 0.089% 0.0729823%
County Mariposa County Mariposa 0.084% 0.103% 0.0876131% County Mendocino County Mendocino 0.439% 0.536% 0.4558394% City Ukiah Mendocino 0.039% 0.0317153%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 130 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
7 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Merced County Merced 0.551% 0.674% 0.5724262%
City Atwater Merced 0.024% 0.0195846%
City Livingston Merced 0.006% 0.0045873%
City Los Banos Merced 0.020% 0.0165142%
City Merced Merced 0.061% 0.0500762%
County Modoc County Modoc 0.065% 0.080% 0.0678250%
County Mono County Mono 0.023% 0.029% 0.0242606%
County Monterey County Monterey 0.908% 1.111% 0.9437083% City Greenfield Monterey 0.006% 0.0050552%
City King City Monterey 0.005% 0.0037355%
City Marina Monterey 0.017% 0.0144098%
City Monterey Monterey 0.041% 0.0336540%
City Pacific Grove Monterey 0.009% 0.0074842%
City Salinas Monterey 0.094% 0.0776576%
City Seaside Monterey 0.023% 0.0191772%
City Soledad Monterey 0.007% 0.0060870%
County Napa County Napa 0.288% 0.352% 0.2994325%
City American Canyon Napa 0.017% 0.0136869%
City Napa Napa 0.078% 0.0642783%
County Nevada County Nevada 0.441% 0.539% 0.4579827%
City Grass Valley Nevada 0.024% 0.0197805%
City Truckee Nevada 0.003% 0.0023843%
County Orange County Orange 4.364% 5.339% 4.5363576%
City Aliso Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0113841%
City Anaheim Orange 0.554% 0.678% 0.5759282%
City Brea Orange 0.086% 0.0708897%
City Buena Park Orange 0.087% 0.0714352%
City Costa Mesa Orange 0.124% 0.152% 0.1288366%
City Cypress Orange 0.033% 0.0271937%
City Dana Point Orange 0.001% 0.0005560%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 131 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
8 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Fountain Valley Orange 0.055% 0.0455980%
City Fullerton Orange 0.137% 0.168% 0.1425744%
City Garden Grove Orange 0.213% 0.1752482%
City Huntington Beach Orange 0.247% 0.302% 0.2568420%
City Irvine Orange 0.139% 0.170% 0.1442350%
City Laguna Beach Orange 0.047% 0.058% 0.0493043%
City Laguna Hills Orange 0.014% 0.0115457%
City Laguna Niguel Orange 0.001% 0.0007071%
City Laguna Woods Orange 0.001% 0.0006546%
City La Habra Orange 0.060% 0.073% 0.0621049%
City Lake Forest Orange 0.012% 0.0101249%
City La Palma Orange 0.012% 0.0095439%
City Los Alamitos Orange 0.008% 0.0069190%
City Mission Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0117560%
City Newport Beach Orange 0.179% 0.1470134%
City Orange Orange 0.150% 0.1231320%
City Placentia Orange 0.029% 0.035% 0.0298912%
City Rancho Santa Margarita Orange 0.001% 0.0006296%
City San Clemente Orange 0.008% 0.010% 0.0086083%
City San Juan Capistrano Orange 0.008% 0.0065510%
City Santa Ana Orange 0.502% 0.614% 0.5213866%
City Seal Beach Orange 0.020% 0.0165891%
City Stanton Orange 0.035% 0.0291955%
City Tustin Orange 0.073% 0.0600341%
City Westminster Orange 0.104% 0.127% 0.1082721%
City Yorba Linda Orange 0.044% 0.0362223%
County Placer County Placer 1.045% 1.278% 1.0861002%
City Auburn Placer 0.017% 0.0141114%
City Lincoln Placer 0.031% 0.0255599%
City Rocklin Placer 0.076% 0.0625485%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 132 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
9 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Roseville Placer 0.196% 0.1616559%
County Plumas County Plumas 0.205% 0.251% 0.2128729%
County Riverside County Riverside 4.534% 5.547% 4.7128296% City Banning Riverside 0.017% 0.0143848%
City Beaumont Riverside 0.021% 0.0171135%
City Blythe Riverside 0.012% 0.0096714%
City Canyon Lake Riverside 0.000% 0.0001761%
City Cathedral City Riverside 0.067% 0.0553614%
City Coachella Riverside 0.021% 0.0173054%
City Corona Riverside 0.147% 0.1207083%
City Desert Hot Springs Riverside 0.024% 0.0200433%
City Eastvale Riverside 0.000% 0.0002747%
City Hemet Riverside 0.051% 0.0421792%
City Indio Riverside 0.056% 0.0457794%
City Jurupa Valley Riverside 0.001% 0.0008991%
City Lake Elsinore Riverside 0.021% 0.0172949%
City La Quinta Riverside 0.063% 0.0516732%
City Menifee Riverside 0.032% 0.0260909%
City Moreno Valley Riverside 0.137% 0.1130348%
City Murrieta Riverside 0.048% 0.059% 0.0497423%
City Norco Riverside 0.016% 0.0134542%
City Palm Desert Riverside 0.083% 0.0682465%
City Palm Springs Riverside 0.076% 0.0629862%
City Perris Riverside 0.009% 0.0076774%
City Rancho Mirage Riverside 0.052% 0.0431098%
City Riverside Riverside 0.268% 0.2206279%
City San Jacinto Riverside 0.010% 0.0085936%
City Temecula Riverside 0.022% 0.0180086%
City Wildomar Riverside 0.008% 0.0062500%
County Sacramento County Sacramento 3.797% 4.645% 3.9465887% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 133 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
10 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Citrus Heights Sacramento 0.057% 0.0465312%
City Elk Grove Sacramento 0.130% 0.1066994%
City Folsom Sacramento 0.108% 0.0890850%
City Galt Sacramento 0.017% 0.0143704%
City Rancho Cordova Sacramento 0.008% 0.0067679%
City Sacramento Sacramento 0.721% 0.882% 0.7496530%
County San Benito County San Benito 0.106% 0.130% 0.1101417% City Hollister San Benito 0.027% 0.0225355%
County San Bernardino County San Bernardino 3.259% 3.987% 3.3878124% City Adelanto San Bernardino 0.008% 0.0066640%
City Apple Valley San Bernardino 0.025% 0.0207360%
City Barstow San Bernardino 0.015% 0.0122056%
City Chino San Bernardino 0.064% 0.0525893%
City Chino Hills San Bernardino 0.001% 0.0006388%
City Colton San Bernardino 0.031% 0.0253443%
City Fontana San Bernardino 0.112% 0.0920543%
City Grand Terrace San Bernardino 0.006% 0.0051051%
City Hesperia San Bernardino 0.035% 0.0291522%
City Highland San Bernardino 0.004% 0.0029061%
City Loma Linda San Bernardino 0.009% 0.0071188%
City Montclair San Bernardino 0.039% 0.0322108%
City Ontario San Bernardino 0.179% 0.1472934%
City Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino 0.084% 0.0689431%
City Redlands San Bernardino 0.057% 0.0469150%
City Rialto San Bernardino 0.073% 0.0603206%
City San Bernardino San Bernardino 0.178% 0.1461880%
City Twentynine Palms San Bernardino 0.002% 0.0012605%
City Upland San Bernardino 0.052% 0.0424460%
City Victorville San Bernardino 0.033% 0.0269400%
City Yucaipa San Bernardino 0.016% 0.0128772%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 134 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
11 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Yucca Valley San Bernardino 0.003% 0.0021228%
County San Diego County San Diego 5.706% 6.980% 5.9309748% City Carlsbad San Diego 0.128% 0.1050485%
City Chula Vista San Diego 0.189% 0.231% 0.1961456%
City Coronado San Diego 0.044% 0.0359095%
City El Cajon San Diego 0.113% 0.0933582%
City Encinitas San Diego 0.061% 0.074% 0.0630289%
City Escondido San Diego 0.145% 0.1192204%
City Imperial Beach San Diego 0.014% 0.0118283%
City La Mesa San Diego 0.055% 0.068% 0.0575593%
City Lemon Grove San Diego 0.022% 0.0183911%
City National City San Diego 0.080% 0.0656808%
City Oceanside San Diego 0.213% 0.1753428%
City Poway San Diego 0.062% 0.0511040%
City San Diego San Diego 1.975% 2.416% 2.0531169%
City San Marcos San Diego 0.089% 0.0733897%
City Santee San Diego 0.033% 0.0268401%
City Solana Beach San Diego 0.017% 0.0138564%
City Vista San Diego 0.052% 0.0425144%
Consolidated San Francisco San Francisco 3.026% 3.702% 3.1457169% County San Joaquin County San Joaquin 1.680% 2.055% 1.7460399% City Lathrop San Joaquin 0.009% 0.0075394%
City Lodi San Joaquin 0.053% 0.0439484%
City Manteca San Joaquin 0.054% 0.0443454%
City Ripon San Joaquin 0.013% 0.0104219%
City Stockton San Joaquin 0.313% 0.383% 0.3256176%
City Tracy San Joaquin 0.084% 0.0692047%
County San Luis Obispo County San Luis Obispo 0.816% 0.999% 0.8484126% City Arroyo Grande San Luis Obispo 0.024% 0.0199053%
City Atascadero San Luis Obispo 0.029% 0.0240680%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 135 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
12 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles) San Luis Obispo 0.043% 0.0353456% City Grover Beach San Luis Obispo 0.017% 0.0137881%
City Morro Bay San Luis Obispo 0.020% 0.0160922%
City San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo 0.077% 0.0637841%
County San Mateo County San Mateo 1.074% 1.313% 1.1159599% City Belmont San Mateo 0.021% 0.0169860%
City Burlingame San Mateo 0.019% 0.0152537%
City Daly City San Mateo 0.044% 0.0363880%
City East Palo Alto San Mateo 0.013% 0.0103982%
City Foster City San Mateo 0.020% 0.0166101%
City Half Moon Bay San Mateo 0.004% 0.0031638%
City Hillsborough San Mateo 0.013% 0.0110029%
City Menlo Park San Mateo 0.015% 0.0126209%
City Millbrae San Mateo 0.013% 0.0105836%
City Pacifica San Mateo 0.016% 0.0130625%
City Redwood City San Mateo 0.056% 0.0463511%
City San Bruno San Mateo 0.021% 0.0172161%
City San Carlos San Mateo 0.013% 0.0108885%
City San Mateo San Mateo 0.052% 0.0425841%
City South San Francisco San Mateo 0.043% 0.0353943%
County Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara 1.132% 1.385% 1.1768968% City Carpinteria Santa Barbara 0.001% 0.0008938%
City Goleta Santa Barbara 0.004% 0.0028969%
City Lompoc Santa Barbara 0.047% 0.0389379%
City Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 0.122% 0.1004559%
City Santa Maria Santa Barbara 0.058% 0.0479179%
County Santa Clara County Santa Clara 2.404% 2.941% 2.4987553% City Campbell Santa Clara 0.014% 0.0112566%
City Cupertino Santa Clara 0.008% 0.0066824%
City Gilroy Santa Clara 0.025% 0.0202891%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 136 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
13 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Los Altos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103338%
City Los Gatos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103220%
City Milpitas Santa Clara 0.036% 0.0298120%
City Morgan Hill Santa Clara 0.015% 0.0124619%
City Mountain View Santa Clara 0.041% 0.0334608%
City Palo Alto Santa Clara 0.039% 0.0323080%
City San Jose Santa Clara 0.294% 0.360% 0.3054960%
City Santa Clara Santa Clara 0.067% 0.0549723%
City Saratoga Santa Clara 0.004% 0.0034161%
City Sunnyvale Santa Clara 0.053% 0.0434069%
County Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz 0.783% 0.957% 0.8135396% City Capitola Santa Cruz 0.020% 0.0168191%
City Santa Cruz Santa Cruz 0.143% 0.1180348%
City Scotts Valley Santa Cruz 0.015% 0.0126525%
City Watsonville Santa Cruz 0.063% 0.0520136%
County Shasta County Shasta 1.095% 1.339% 1.1380191%
City Anderson Shasta 0.024% 0.0198896%
City Redding Shasta 0.284% 0.2334841%
City Shasta Lake Shasta 0.004% 0.0031993%
County Siskiyou County Siskiyou 0.228% 0.279% 0.2373393% County Solano County Solano 0.760% 0.6260795%
City Benicia Solano 0.031% 0.0253903%
City Dixon Solano 0.016% 0.0130849%
City Fairfield Solano 0.109% 0.0897317%
City Suisun City Solano 0.021% 0.0176183%
City Vacaville Solano 0.119% 0.0976497%
City Vallejo Solano 0.167% 0.1373644%
County Sonoma County Sonoma 1.218% 1.490% 1.2661290%
City Healdsburg Sonoma 0.032% 0.0266929%
City Petaluma Sonoma 0.081% 0.0667507%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 137 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
14 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Rohnert Park Sonoma 0.041% 0.0340759%
City Santa Rosa Sonoma 0.184% 0.1519070%
City Sonoma Sonoma 0.022% 0.0183438%
City Windsor Sonoma 0.016% 0.0129298%
County Stanislaus County Stanislaus 1.722% 1.4182273%
City Ceres Stanislaus 0.041% 0.0340260%
City Modesto Stanislaus 0.217% 0.1788759%
City Newman Stanislaus 0.006% 0.0046964%
City Oakdale Stanislaus 0.018% 0.0145531%
City Patterson Stanislaus 0.015% 0.0126590%
City Riverbank Stanislaus 0.010% 0.0085699%
City Turlock Stanislaus 0.065% 0.0531966%
County Sutter County Sutter 0.306% 0.374% 0.3179548%
City Yuba City Sutter 0.074% 0.0606242%
County Tehama County Tehama 0.213% 0.261% 0.2216654%
City Red Bluff Tehama 0.014% 0.0117771%
County Trinity County Trinity 0.082% 0.101% 0.0855476%
County Tulare County Tulare 0.809% 0.990% 0.8410949%
City Dinuba Tulare 0.014% 0.0116929%
City Exeter Tulare 0.004% 0.0032479%
City Farmersville Tulare 0.003% 0.0027879%
City Lindsay Tulare 0.007% 0.0057111%
City Porterville Tulare 0.021% 0.0171845%
City Tulare Tulare 0.037% 0.0302273%
City Visalia Tulare 0.066% 0.0545872%
County Tuolumne County Tuolumne 0.486% 0.594% 0.5047621% County Ventura County Ventura 2.192% 2.681% 2.2781201%
City Camarillo Ventura 0.002% 0.0012815%
City Fillmore Ventura 0.002% 0.0020294%
City Moorpark Ventura 0.008% 0.0067337%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 138 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
15 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Oxnard Ventura 0.156% 0.190% 0.1617338%
City Port Hueneme Ventura 0.021% 0.0174145%
City San Buenaventura (Ventura) Ventura 0.085% 0.0702181% City Santa Paula Ventura 0.014% 0.0119072%
City Simi Valley Ventura 0.065% 0.0533043%
City Thousand Oaks Ventura 0.022% 0.0179902%
County Yolo County Yolo 0.357% 0.437% 0.3713319%
City Davis Yolo 0.055% 0.0451747%
City West Sacramento Yolo 0.066% 0.0544321%
City Woodland Yolo 0.058% 0.0477904%
County Yuba County Yuba 0.214% 0.262% 0.2225679%
City Marysville Yuba 0.014% 0.0112079%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 139 April 11, 2023
1 APPENDIX 2
Cost Reimbursement Procedure

1. Additional defined terms:
a) Costs means the reasonable amounts paid for the attorney and other City Attorney and County Counsel staff time for individuals employed by a Plaintiff Subdivision at the contractual rate, inclusive of benefits and overhead, together with amounts paid for court reporters, experts, copying, electronic research, travel, vendors, and the like, which were not previously reimbursed and which were paid or incurred (i) prior to December 31, 2022 in litigation against any Opioid Defendant and/or (ii) in negotiating and drafting any CA Allocation Agreement(s) concerning a settlement with any Opioid Defendant(s).

Costs does not include attorneys’ fees, costs, or expenses incurred by private contingency fee counsel. No part of the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be used to reimburse Costs.
b) First Claims Date means October 1, 2023 or when all applications for reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in part, from funds available under Section XIV and Exhibit R of the Teva Settlement Agreement, Section XIII and Exhibit R of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement, Section XI and Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the CVS Settlement Agreement, Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, or Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, have been finally determined under the provisions of those agreements, whichever comes first. c) Special Master means a retired judicial officer or former public lawyer, not presently employed or retained by a Plaintiff Subdivision, who will aggregate, review, and determine the reasonable Costs to be awarded to each Plaintiff Subdivision that submits a claim for reimbursement of Costs. The Special Master will be selected by a majority vote of the votes cast by Plaintiff Subdivisions, with each such subdivision having one vote. d) Plaintiff Subdivision Committee means the committee of Plaintiff Subdivisions that will review and approve the invoices submitted by the Special Master reflecting his or her reasonable time and expenses.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 140 April 11, 2023
2 i. If a Plaintiff Subdivision is eligible to seek reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in part, from funds available under Section XIV and Exhibit R of the Teva Settlement Agreement, Section XIII and Exhibit R of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the CVS Settlement Agreement, Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, Section X or Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement, or Section XI or Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, it must first make a timely application for reimbursement from such funds. To allow sufficient time for determination of those applications, no claim for Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund under this Agreement may be made before the First Claims Date. ii. A Plaintiff Subdivision that wishes to be reimbursed from the CA Subdivision Fund must submit a claim to the Special Master no later than forty-five (45) days after the First Claims Date. The Special Master will then compile and redistribute the aggregated claim totals for each Plaintiff Subdivision via email to representatives of all the Plaintiff Subdivisions. A claim for attorney and staff time must list, for each attorney or staff member included in the claim, the following information: name, title, total hours claimed, hourly rate (including, if sought, benefits and share of overhead), and narrative summarizing the general nature of the work performed by the attorney or staff member. For reimbursement of “hard” costs, the subdivision may aggregate across a category (e.g., total for travel costs). It is the intention of the Plaintiff Subdivisions that submission of documents related to reimbursement of Costs does not waive any attorney-client privilege or exemptions to the California Public Records Act.
iii. The Special Master may request, at his or her sole option, additional documents or details to assist in the final award of Costs.
iv. The Special Master will review claims for reasonableness and will notify each Plaintiff Subdivision of the final determination of its claim, and will provide a list of all final awards to all Plaintiff Subdivisions by email or, upon request, via First Class U.S. Mail. Any Plaintiff Subdivision may ask the Special Master to reconsider any final award within twenty-one (21) days. The Special Master will make a final determination on any such reconsideration request within thirty (30) days of receipt. v. Any decision of the Special Master is final and binding, and will be considered under the California Arbitration Act, Code of Civil Procedure section 1280 et seq. as a final arbitration award. Nothing in this agreement is intended to expand the scope of judicial review of the final award for errors of fact or law, and the Parties agree that they may only seek to vacate the award if clear and convincing evidence demonstrates one of the factors set forth in Code of Civil Procedure, section 1286.2, subdivision (a). Plaintiff Subdivisions will have fourteen (14) days after all final awards are made, together with any final determination of a request for reconsideration, to seek review in the Superior Court of California, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285, where the State has filed its Consent Judgment.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 141 April 11, 2023
3 vi. The Special Master will prepare a report of Costs that includes his or her fees and expenses at least ninety (90) days before the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Special Master’s preparation of a report of Costs does not discharge a Plaintiff Subdivision’s reporting requirement under Section VIII.C of the Allergan Settlement Agreement.
vii. A member of the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee, which is a CA Participating Subdivision, will submit to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Allergan a report of the fees and expenses incurred by the Special Master pursuant to Section VIII.C of the Allergan Settlement Agreement.
c) Claims Priority and Limitation.
i. The Special Master will submit invoices for compensation of reasonable fees and expenses to the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee no later than ninety (90) days prior to the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Plaintiff Subdivision Committee will promptly review and, if reasonable, approve the Special Master’s invoice for compensation. The Plaintiff Subdivision Committee will submit approved invoices to the Settlement Fund Administrator for payment. The Special Master’s approved invoices have priority and will be paid first from the CA Subdivision Fund before any award of Costs, subject to the limitation in Section 2.c.v below. ii. Final Awards of Costs that do not exceed seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) will be paid next in priority after the Special Master’s approved invoices.
iii. Final Awards of Costs in excess of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) will be paid proportionally from the funds remaining in that year’s Annual Payment. iv. Any claim for Costs that is not paid in full will be allocated against the next year’s distribution from the CA Subdivision Fund, until all approved claims for Costs are paid in full.
v. In no event will more than 50% of the total CA Subdivision Fund received in any year be used to pay Costs or the Special Master’s approved invoices. vi. In no event shall more than $28 million of the total CA Subdivision Funds paid pursuant to the Teva Settlement Agreement, Allergan Settlement Agreement, Distributor Settlement Agreement, CVS Settlement Agreement, Janssen Settlement Agreement, Walgreens Settlement Agreement, and the Walmart Settlement Agreement be used to pay Costs.
d) Collateral Source Payments and Third-Party Settlement. i. In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision is awarded compensation, in whole or in part, by any source of funds created as a result of litigation against an Opioid Defendant for its reasonable Costs, it will reduce its claim for Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund by that amount. If a Plaintiff Subdivision has already received a final award of Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund, it will repay the fund up to the prior award DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 142 April 11, 2023
4 of Costs via a payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator or notify the Settlement Fund Administrator that its allocation from the next and subsequent Annual Payments should be reduced accordingly. If the Plaintiff Subdivision is repaying any prior award of Costs, that repayment will occur as soon as is feasible after the Plaintiff Subdivision’s receipt of Cost funds from the collateral source, but no more than 90 days after its receipt from the collateral source. The Settlement Fund Administrator will add any repaid Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund. Any Plaintiff Subdivision that has submitted for reimbursement to any national fund and has not received a final determination by the First Claims Date may request that the settlement administrator withhold some or all of its payment from the CA Subdivision Fund in order to avoid repayment.
ii. In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision reaches a monetary settlement or compromise against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement, the monetary portion of such settlement, net of fees paid to outside contingency fee counsel and of funds earmarked strictly for abatement, will be credited against its Costs and the subdivision will be ineligible to recover those credited Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund. Plaintiff Subdivisions negotiating monetary settlements or compromises against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement will negotiate for funds to repay any Costs it previously received from the CA Subdivision Fund or for Costs it otherwise might be eligible to claim from the CA Subdivision Fund. If such a settlement is paid after all final approved claims for Costs by all Plaintiff Subdivisions are satisfied in full, the settling subdivision will reimburse the CA Subdivision Fund in that amount by making payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator to add to the CA Subdivision Fund in a manner consistent with the repayments described in section 2.d.i above.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 143 April 11, 2023
1 APPENDIX 3

CALIFORNIA-SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political subdivisions eligible to participate in the Allergan Settlement and their counsel.

In light of the Order, and at the request of [SUBDIVISION], the [SUBDIVISION], its counsel [COUNSEL], and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of California, are entering into this California-Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop Agreement). [SUBDIVISION] and [COUNSEL] intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a State BackStop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Expenses) of the Allergan Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Allergan Settlement Agreement and CA Allergan Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Allergan Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL], together with any contingency fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the national Attorney Fee Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the total gross recovery of [SUBDIVISION] from the Allergan Settlement.
[COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created under the Allergan Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of “State BackStop Agreement” in Exhibit R of the Allergan Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between “a Settling State” and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
[DATE] [SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 144 April 11, 2023
1 Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds – Teva Settlement

1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Teva Settlement Agreement, dated as of November 22, 2022, and any revision thereto (the “Teva Settlement Agreement”), including Section VIII and Exhibit O, the State of California proposes this agreement (the “CA Teva Allocation Agreement”) to govern the allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to Sections VI, VII, and VIII of the Teva Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Sections IX, XIII, or XIV of the Teva Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Teva Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA Teva Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.1 Further, pursuant to Sections X.B and X.C of the Teva Settlement Agreement and Sections IX.B and IX.C of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, eligible Subdivisions must participate in both the Teva Settlement Agreement and Allergan Settlement Agreement, or neither.

2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Subdivision with a population equal to or greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Teva Settlement Agreement. b) Allergan Settlement Agreement means the Allergan Settlement Agreement dated November 22, 2022, and any revision thereto.
c) CVS Settlement Agreement means the CVS Settlement Agreement dated December 9, 2022, and any revision thereto as well as any modification thereto entered into by the State of California and CVS.
d) Distributor Settlement Agreement means the Distributor Settlement Agreement dated July 21, 2021, and any revision thereto.
e) Janssen Settlement Agreement means the Janssen Settlement Agreement dated July 21, 2021, and any revision thereto.
f) Walgreens Settlement Agreement means the Walgreens Settlement Agreement dated December 9, 2022, and any revision thereto.
1 A parallel but separate agreement (the “CA Allergan Allocation Agreement”) will govern the allocation, distribution, and use of settlement fund payments under the Allergan Settlement Agreement.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 145 April 11, 2023
2 g) Walmart Settlement Agreement means the Walmart Settlement Agreement dated November 14, 2022, and any revision thereto.
h) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in California. CA Litigating Special Districts include Downey Unified School District, Elk Grove Unified School District, Kern High School District, Montezuma Fire Protection District (located in Stockton, California), Santa Barbara San Luis Obispo Regional Health Authority, Inland Empire Health Plan, Health Plan of San Joaquin, San Leandro Unified School District, Pleasant Valley School District Board, and LA Care Health Plan.
i) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020. j) Opioid Defendant means any defendant (including but not limited to Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, and McKesson Corporation) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.

3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Teva Settlement Agreement, as well as applicable law, and the Teva Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of this CA Teva Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Teva Allocation Agreement have the same meaning as in the Teva Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.

Pursuant to Section VIII(E)(1) of the Teva Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section VIII(C) of the Teva Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.

4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California,2pursuant to the Teva Settlement Agreement, shall be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the 2 For purposes of clarity, use of the term “California” refers to the geographic territory of California and the state and its local governments therein. The term “State” or “State of California” refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 146 April 11, 2023
3 Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Teva Allocation Agreement, and 15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the “State of California Allocation”), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund (“CA Abatement Accounts Fund”), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund (“CA Subdivision Fund”).

A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by the State for future Opioid Remediation.

B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
i. Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the “Local Allocation”). For the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and counties with a population less than 10,000 are not eligible to receive an allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision, and will receive payments as provided in the Teva Settlement Agreement. c) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as: (a) the county is a CA Participating Subdivision, and (b) the city has not advised the Settlement Fund Administrator that it requests direct payment at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the county’s share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight).
d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share, with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA Teva
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 147 April 11, 2023
4 Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San Jose and Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become Participating Subdivisions.
e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Teva Settlement Agreement and this CA Teva Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must be transferred to the State. This provision shall not apply to the Cost Reimbursement Funds, which shall be controlled by Appendix 2. ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to the Teva Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program; (2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) treatment infrastructure; (3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non-sworn) and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability, restorative justice, and harm reduction; and/or (5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth. c) The California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”) may add to this list (but not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 148 April 11, 2023
5 d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Teva Settlement Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for Opioid Remediation consistent with the Teva Settlement Agreement and this CA Teva Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Teva Settlement Agreement and this CA Teva Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision’s use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Teva Settlement Agreement or this CA Teva Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern. c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the Subdivision’s use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise enforce the requirements of the Teva Settlement Agreement or this CA Teva Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this agreement. e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits, 6 investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal enforcement actions.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 149 April 11, 2023
6 C. CA Subdivision Fund
i. Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used, subject to any limits imposed by the Teva Settlement Agreement and this CA Teva Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioidrelated expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation, and to pay the reasonable fees and expenses of the Special Master as set forth in Appendix 2.

D. Provision for State Back-Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) (“MDL Fees Order”) in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) “cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee agreements at 15%.” Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the Teva Settlement Agreement and Allergan Settlement Agreement, and, if applicable, the CVS Settlement Agreement, Distributor Settlement Agreement, Janssen Settlement Agreement, Walgreens Settlement Agreement, and Walmart Settlement Agreement.

A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use its share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency-fee counsel (“State Back-Stop Agreement”), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(X), of the Teva Settlement Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 150 April 11, 2023
7 so long as such contingency fees do not exceed a total contingency fee of 15% of the total gross recovery of the Plaintiff Subdivision pursuant to the Teva Settlement, inclusive of contingency fees from the national Attorney Fee Fund and this State Back-Stop Agreement. Before seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back-Stop Agreement, private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Teva Settlement Agreement. Further, private counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 151 April 11, 2023
8 d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and expenditures, as required by the Teva Settlement Agreement and this CA Teva Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used, including if used to pay attorneys’ fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to Section VIII(C) of the Teva Settlement Agreement, such information must also be reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Teva.
e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the State and Participating Subdivisions.

6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA Teva Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Teva Settlement Agreement, this CA Teva Allocation Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Teva Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. a) Except as provided in the Teva Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 152 April 11, 2023
9 The undersigned, California City city, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Teva Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Teva Settlement and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Teva Settlement. EXECUTED on /date_1_teva_allergan/.

Signature: /signer_1_teva_allergan/
Name: /name_1_teva_allergan/
Title: /title_1_teva_allergan/
Date: /date_1_teva_allergan/
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 Inge Elmes
City Manager
April 11, 2023
153 April 11, 2023
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds—Teva Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change.

Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change. Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” pursuant to Section 4.B.e., the State of California will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision. Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not an Initial Participating Subdivision, will be re-allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the California Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.B. Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.C.

Regarding the column herein entitled “Weighted Allocation Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 154 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
1 of 15
100.000% 100.000% 100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Alameda County Alameda 2.332% 2.853% 2.4237952%
City Alameda Alameda 0.069% 0.0570162%
City Albany Alameda 0.013% 0.0107768%
City Berkeley Alameda 0.152% 0.1249656%
City Dublin Alameda 0.033% 0.040% 0.0338810%
City Emeryville Alameda 0.023% 0.0185765%
City Fremont Alameda 0.108% 0.0888576%
City Hayward Alameda 0.117% 0.0966218%
City Livermore Alameda 0.054% 0.0446740%
City Newark Alameda 0.026% 0.0217626%
City Oakland Alameda 0.486% 0.595% 0.5055601%
City Piedmont Alameda 0.014% 0.0114064%
City Pleasanton Alameda 0.067% 0.0554547%
City San Leandro Alameda 0.039% 0.0321267%
City Union City Alameda 0.043% 0.0352484%
County Amador County Amador 0.226% 0.277% 0.2349885%
County Butte County Butte 1.615% 1.975% 1.6783178%
City Chico Butte 0.216% 0.264% 0.2246499%
City Oroville Butte 0.079% 0.0646595%
County Calaveras County Calaveras 0.226% 0.277% 0.2351644% County Colusa County Colusa 0.059% 0.0489221%
County Contra Costa County Contra Costa 2.102% 2.571% 2.1844585% City Antioch Contra Costa 0.037% 0.0301879%
City Brentwood Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0215339%
City Clayton Contra Costa 0.002% 0.0018060%
City Concord Contra Costa 0.055% 0.0456676%
City Danville Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0082255%
City El Cerrito Contra Costa 0.023% 0.0189024%
City Hercules Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0078273%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 155 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
2 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Lafayette Contra Costa 0.006% 0.0046030%
City Martinez Contra Costa 0.012% 0.0098593%
City Moraga Contra Costa 0.004% 0.0031007%
City Oakley Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0079416%
City Orinda Contra Costa 0.005% 0.0038157%
City Pinole Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0110909%
City Pittsburg Contra Costa 0.053% 0.0436369%
City Pleasant Hill Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0106309%
City Richmond Contra Costa 0.146% 0.1201444%
City San Pablo Contra Costa 0.018% 0.0148843%
City San Ramon Contra Costa 0.021% 0.0176459%
City Walnut Creek Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0212132%
County Del Norte County Del Norte 0.114% 0.140% 0.1189608% County El Dorado County El Dorado 0.768% 0.939% 0.7980034% City Placerville El Dorado 0.015% 0.0127642%
City South Lake Tahoe El Dorado 0.081% 0.0665456%
County Fresno County Fresno 1.895% 2.318% 1.9693410%
City Clovis Fresno 0.065% 0.0536211%
City Coalinga Fresno 0.012% 0.0098554%
City Fresno Fresno 0.397% 0.3270605%
City Kerman Fresno 0.005% 0.0042534%
City Kingsburg Fresno 0.008% 0.0066167%
City Mendota Fresno 0.002% 0.0019387%
City Orange Cove Fresno 0.004% 0.0035607%
City Parlier Fresno 0.008% 0.0069755%
City Reedley Fresno 0.012% 0.0098804%
City Sanger Fresno 0.018% 0.0146135%
City Selma Fresno 0.015% 0.0127537%
County Glenn County Glenn 0.107% 0.131% 0.1116978%
County Humboldt County Humboldt 1.030% 1.260% 1.0703185% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 156 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
3 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Arcata Humboldt 0.054% 0.0447660%
City Eureka Humboldt 0.117% 0.143% 0.1216284%
City Fortuna Humboldt 0.032% 0.0266837%
County Imperial County Imperial 0.258% 0.315% 0.2679006% City Brawley Imperial 0.011% 0.0087986%
City Calexico Imperial 0.019% 0.0152799%
City El Centro Imperial 0.158% 0.1302522%
City Imperial Imperial 0.006% 0.0048791%
County Inyo County Inyo 0.073% 0.089% 0.0754413%
County Kern County Kern 2.517% 3.079% 2.6159145%
City Arvin Kern 0.006% 0.0046425%
City Bakersfield Kern 0.212% 0.1747198%
City California City Kern 0.009% 0.0070820%
City Delano Kern 0.030% 0.0249316%
City McFarland Kern 0.003% 0.0025644%
City Ridgecrest Kern 0.015% 0.0120938%
City Shafter Kern 0.013% 0.0103417%
City Tehachapi Kern 0.009% 0.0073580%
City Wasco Kern 0.008% 0.0069861%
County Kings County Kings 0.293% 0.2413469%
City Avenal Kings 0.007% 0.0056335%
City Corcoran Kings 0.013% 0.0107032%
City Hanford Kings 0.027% 0.0226038%
City Lemoore Kings 0.016% 0.0131900%
County Lake County Lake 0.795% 0.6545389%
City Clearlake Lake 0.041% 0.050% 0.0426253%
City Lakeport Lake 0.021% 0.026% 0.0222964%
County Lassen County Lassen 0.319% 0.391% 0.3320610%
City Susanville Lassen 0.027% 0.0219295%
County Los Angeles County Los Angeles 13.896% 16.999% 14.4437559% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 157 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
4 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Agoura Hills Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040024%
City Alhambra Los Angeles 0.042% 0.0343309%
City Arcadia Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0267718%
City Artesia Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0005100%
City Azusa Los Angeles 0.026% 0.0210857%
City Baldwin Park Los Angeles 0.027% 0.0218520%
City Bell Los Angeles 0.008% 0.0068783%
City Bellflower Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0014485%
City Bell Gardens Los Angeles 0.014% 0.0114301%
City Beverly Hills Los Angeles 0.065% 0.0534897%
City Burbank Los Angeles 0.100% 0.0823132%
City Calabasas Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048948%
City Carson Los Angeles 0.019% 0.0159805%
City Cerritos Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039682%
City Claremont Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0082584%
City Commerce Los Angeles 0.000% 0.0002971%
City Compton Los Angeles 0.044% 0.0361882%
City Covina Los Angeles 0.028% 0.0229127%
City Cudahy Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006020%
City Culver City Los Angeles 0.055% 0.0449894%
City Diamond Bar Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006993%
City Downey Los Angeles 0.052% 0.0429994%
City Duarte Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0027261%
City El Monte Los Angeles 0.031% 0.038% 0.0318985%
City El Segundo Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0268020%
City Gardena Los Angeles 0.034% 0.0278088%
City Glendale Los Angeles 0.166% 0.1366586%
City Glendora Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134411%
City Hawaiian Gardens Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040549%
City Hawthorne Los Angeles 0.050% 0.0407833%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 158 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
5 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Hermosa Beach Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0145307%
City Huntington Park Los Angeles 0.023% 0.0190667%
City Inglewood Los Angeles 0.059% 0.0489195%
City La Cañada Flintridge Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0025565% City Lakewood Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039971%
City La Mirada Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0081572%
City Lancaster Los Angeles 0.045% 0.0369689%
City La Puente Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012999%
City La Verne Los Angeles 0.024% 0.0194190%
City Lawndale Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0017731%
City Lomita Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0031940%
City Long Beach Los Angeles 0.439% 0.3614151%
City Los Angeles Los Angeles 2.715% 3.321% 2.8218811%
City Lynwood Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134345%
City Malibu Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0019269%
City Manhattan Beach Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260686%
City Maywood Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0035528%
City Monrovia Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0254455%
City Montebello Los Angeles 0.030% 0.0250670%
City Monterey Park Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0256677%
City Norwalk Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0258228%
City Palmdale Los Angeles 0.046% 0.0375827%
City Palos Verdes Estates Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0053102% City Paramount Los Angeles 0.011% 0.0091483%
City Pasadena Los Angeles 0.146% 0.1200524%
City Pico Rivera Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0183333%
City Pomona Los Angeles 0.111% 0.0911933%
City Rancho Palos Verdes Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012645%
City Redondo Beach Los Angeles 0.062% 0.0506992%
City Rosemead Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0028260%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 159 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
6 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City San Dimas Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0022016%
City San Fernando Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0104837%
City San Gabriel Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0147726%
City San Marino Los Angeles 0.009% 0.0073791%
City Santa Clarita Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0178167%
City Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0257531%
City Santa Monica Los Angeles 0.158% 0.1298513%
City Sierra Madre Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048646%
City Signal Hill Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0084884%
City South El Monte Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039603%
City South Gate Los Angeles 0.020% 0.0166272%
City South Pasadena Los Angeles 0.012% 0.0095334%
City Temple City Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039498%
City Torrance Los Angeles 0.112% 0.0919820%
City Walnut Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0047305%
City West Covina Los Angeles 0.049% 0.0404521%
City West Hollywood Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0108517%
City Whittier Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260581%
County Madera County Madera 0.349% 0.427% 0.3630669%
City Chowchilla Madera 0.012% 0.0097332%
City Madera Madera 0.039% 0.0318441%
County Marin County Marin 0.564% 0.690% 0.5861325%
City Larkspur Marin 0.015% 0.0124697%
City Mill Valley Marin 0.020% 0.0168401%
City Novato Marin 0.028% 0.0229824%
City San Anselmo Marin 0.009% 0.0078062%
City San Rafael Marin 0.089% 0.0729823%
County Mariposa County Mariposa 0.084% 0.103% 0.0876131% County Mendocino County Mendocino 0.439% 0.536% 0.4558394% City Ukiah Mendocino 0.039% 0.0317153%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 160 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
7 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Merced County Merced 0.551% 0.674% 0.5724262%
City Atwater Merced 0.024% 0.0195846%
City Livingston Merced 0.006% 0.0045873%
City Los Banos Merced 0.020% 0.0165142%
City Merced Merced 0.061% 0.0500762%
County Modoc County Modoc 0.065% 0.080% 0.0678250%
County Mono County Mono 0.023% 0.029% 0.0242606%
County Monterey County Monterey 0.908% 1.111% 0.9437083% City Greenfield Monterey 0.006% 0.0050552%
City King City Monterey 0.005% 0.0037355%
City Marina Monterey 0.017% 0.0144098%
City Monterey Monterey 0.041% 0.0336540%
City Pacific Grove Monterey 0.009% 0.0074842%
City Salinas Monterey 0.094% 0.0776576%
City Seaside Monterey 0.023% 0.0191772%
City Soledad Monterey 0.007% 0.0060870%
County Napa County Napa 0.288% 0.352% 0.2994325%
City American Canyon Napa 0.017% 0.0136869%
City Napa Napa 0.078% 0.0642783%
County Nevada County Nevada 0.441% 0.539% 0.4579827%
City Grass Valley Nevada 0.024% 0.0197805%
City Truckee Nevada 0.003% 0.0023843%
County Orange County Orange 4.364% 5.339% 4.5363576%
City Aliso Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0113841%
City Anaheim Orange 0.554% 0.678% 0.5759282%
City Brea Orange 0.086% 0.0708897%
City Buena Park Orange 0.087% 0.0714352%
City Costa Mesa Orange 0.124% 0.152% 0.1288366%
City Cypress Orange 0.033% 0.0271937%
City Dana Point Orange 0.001% 0.0005560%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 161 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
8 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Fountain Valley Orange 0.055% 0.0455980%
City Fullerton Orange 0.137% 0.168% 0.1425744%
City Garden Grove Orange 0.213% 0.1752482%
City Huntington Beach Orange 0.247% 0.302% 0.2568420%
City Irvine Orange 0.139% 0.170% 0.1442350%
City Laguna Beach Orange 0.047% 0.058% 0.0493043%
City Laguna Hills Orange 0.014% 0.0115457%
City Laguna Niguel Orange 0.001% 0.0007071%
City Laguna Woods Orange 0.001% 0.0006546%
City La Habra Orange 0.060% 0.073% 0.0621049%
City Lake Forest Orange 0.012% 0.0101249%
City La Palma Orange 0.012% 0.0095439%
City Los Alamitos Orange 0.008% 0.0069190%
City Mission Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0117560%
City Newport Beach Orange 0.179% 0.1470134%
City Orange Orange 0.150% 0.1231320%
City Placentia Orange 0.029% 0.035% 0.0298912%
City Rancho Santa Margarita Orange 0.001% 0.0006296%
City San Clemente Orange 0.008% 0.010% 0.0086083%
City San Juan Capistrano Orange 0.008% 0.0065510%
City Santa Ana Orange 0.502% 0.614% 0.5213866%
City Seal Beach Orange 0.020% 0.0165891%
City Stanton Orange 0.035% 0.0291955%
City Tustin Orange 0.073% 0.0600341%
City Westminster Orange 0.104% 0.127% 0.1082721%
City Yorba Linda Orange 0.044% 0.0362223%
County Placer County Placer 1.045% 1.278% 1.0861002%
City Auburn Placer 0.017% 0.0141114%
City Lincoln Placer 0.031% 0.0255599%
City Rocklin Placer 0.076% 0.0625485%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 162 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
9 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Roseville Placer 0.196% 0.1616559%
County Plumas County Plumas 0.205% 0.251% 0.2128729%
County Riverside County Riverside 4.534% 5.547% 4.7128296% City Banning Riverside 0.017% 0.0143848%
City Beaumont Riverside 0.021% 0.0171135%
City Blythe Riverside 0.012% 0.0096714%
City Canyon Lake Riverside 0.000% 0.0001761%
City Cathedral City Riverside 0.067% 0.0553614%
City Coachella Riverside 0.021% 0.0173054%
City Corona Riverside 0.147% 0.1207083%
City Desert Hot Springs Riverside 0.024% 0.0200433%
City Eastvale Riverside 0.000% 0.0002747%
City Hemet Riverside 0.051% 0.0421792%
City Indio Riverside 0.056% 0.0457794%
City Jurupa Valley Riverside 0.001% 0.0008991%
City Lake Elsinore Riverside 0.021% 0.0172949%
City La Quinta Riverside 0.063% 0.0516732%
City Menifee Riverside 0.032% 0.0260909%
City Moreno Valley Riverside 0.137% 0.1130348%
City Murrieta Riverside 0.048% 0.059% 0.0497423%
City Norco Riverside 0.016% 0.0134542%
City Palm Desert Riverside 0.083% 0.0682465%
City Palm Springs Riverside 0.076% 0.0629862%
City Perris Riverside 0.009% 0.0076774%
City Rancho Mirage Riverside 0.052% 0.0431098%
City Riverside Riverside 0.268% 0.2206279%
City San Jacinto Riverside 0.010% 0.0085936%
City Temecula Riverside 0.022% 0.0180086%
City Wildomar Riverside 0.008% 0.0062500%
County Sacramento County Sacramento 3.797% 4.645% 3.9465887% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 163 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
10 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Citrus Heights Sacramento 0.057% 0.0465312%
City Elk Grove Sacramento 0.130% 0.1066994%
City Folsom Sacramento 0.108% 0.0890850%
City Galt Sacramento 0.017% 0.0143704%
City Rancho Cordova Sacramento 0.008% 0.0067679%
City Sacramento Sacramento 0.721% 0.882% 0.7496530%
County San Benito County San Benito 0.106% 0.130% 0.1101417% City Hollister San Benito 0.027% 0.0225355%
County San Bernardino County San Bernardino 3.259% 3.987% 3.3878124% City Adelanto San Bernardino 0.008% 0.0066640%
City Apple Valley San Bernardino 0.025% 0.0207360%
City Barstow San Bernardino 0.015% 0.0122056%
City Chino San Bernardino 0.064% 0.0525893%
City Chino Hills San Bernardino 0.001% 0.0006388%
City Colton San Bernardino 0.031% 0.0253443%
City Fontana San Bernardino 0.112% 0.0920543%
City Grand Terrace San Bernardino 0.006% 0.0051051%
City Hesperia San Bernardino 0.035% 0.0291522%
City Highland San Bernardino 0.004% 0.0029061%
City Loma Linda San Bernardino 0.009% 0.0071188%
City Montclair San Bernardino 0.039% 0.0322108%
City Ontario San Bernardino 0.179% 0.1472934%
City Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino 0.084% 0.0689431%
City Redlands San Bernardino 0.057% 0.0469150%
City Rialto San Bernardino 0.073% 0.0603206%
City San Bernardino San Bernardino 0.178% 0.1461880%
City Twentynine Palms San Bernardino 0.002% 0.0012605%
City Upland San Bernardino 0.052% 0.0424460%
City Victorville San Bernardino 0.033% 0.0269400%
City Yucaipa San Bernardino 0.016% 0.0128772%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 164 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
11 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Yucca Valley San Bernardino 0.003% 0.0021228%
County San Diego County San Diego 5.706% 6.980% 5.9309748% City Carlsbad San Diego 0.128% 0.1050485%
City Chula Vista San Diego 0.189% 0.231% 0.1961456%
City Coronado San Diego 0.044% 0.0359095%
City El Cajon San Diego 0.113% 0.0933582%
City Encinitas San Diego 0.061% 0.074% 0.0630289%
City Escondido San Diego 0.145% 0.1192204%
City Imperial Beach San Diego 0.014% 0.0118283%
City La Mesa San Diego 0.055% 0.068% 0.0575593%
City Lemon Grove San Diego 0.022% 0.0183911%
City National City San Diego 0.080% 0.0656808%
City Oceanside San Diego 0.213% 0.1753428%
City Poway San Diego 0.062% 0.0511040%
City San Diego San Diego 1.975% 2.416% 2.0531169%
City San Marcos San Diego 0.089% 0.0733897%
City Santee San Diego 0.033% 0.0268401%
City Solana Beach San Diego 0.017% 0.0138564%
City Vista San Diego 0.052% 0.0425144%
Consolidated San Francisco San Francisco 3.026% 3.702% 3.1457169% County San Joaquin County San Joaquin 1.680% 2.055% 1.7460399% City Lathrop San Joaquin 0.009% 0.0075394%
City Lodi San Joaquin 0.053% 0.0439484%
City Manteca San Joaquin 0.054% 0.0443454%
City Ripon San Joaquin 0.013% 0.0104219%
City Stockton San Joaquin 0.313% 0.383% 0.3256176%
City Tracy San Joaquin 0.084% 0.0692047%
County San Luis Obispo County San Luis Obispo 0.816% 0.999% 0.8484126% City Arroyo Grande San Luis Obispo 0.024% 0.0199053%
City Atascadero San Luis Obispo 0.029% 0.0240680%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 165 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
12 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles) San Luis Obispo 0.043% 0.0353456% City Grover Beach San Luis Obispo 0.017% 0.0137881%
City Morro Bay San Luis Obispo 0.020% 0.0160922%
City San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo 0.077% 0.0637841%
County San Mateo County San Mateo 1.074% 1.313% 1.1159599% City Belmont San Mateo 0.021% 0.0169860%
City Burlingame San Mateo 0.019% 0.0152537%
City Daly City San Mateo 0.044% 0.0363880%
City East Palo Alto San Mateo 0.013% 0.0103982%
City Foster City San Mateo 0.020% 0.0166101%
City Half Moon Bay San Mateo 0.004% 0.0031638%
City Hillsborough San Mateo 0.013% 0.0110029%
City Menlo Park San Mateo 0.015% 0.0126209%
City Millbrae San Mateo 0.013% 0.0105836%
City Pacifica San Mateo 0.016% 0.0130625%
City Redwood City San Mateo 0.056% 0.0463511%
City San Bruno San Mateo 0.021% 0.0172161%
City San Carlos San Mateo 0.013% 0.0108885%
City San Mateo San Mateo 0.052% 0.0425841%
City South San Francisco San Mateo 0.043% 0.0353943%
County Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara 1.132% 1.385% 1.1768968% City Carpinteria Santa Barbara 0.001% 0.0008938%
City Goleta Santa Barbara 0.004% 0.0028969%
City Lompoc Santa Barbara 0.047% 0.0389379%
City Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 0.122% 0.1004559%
City Santa Maria Santa Barbara 0.058% 0.0479179%
County Santa Clara County Santa Clara 2.404% 2.941% 2.4987553% City Campbell Santa Clara 0.014% 0.0112566%
City Cupertino Santa Clara 0.008% 0.0066824%
City Gilroy Santa Clara 0.025% 0.0202891%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 166 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
13 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Los Altos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103338%
City Los Gatos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103220%
City Milpitas Santa Clara 0.036% 0.0298120%
City Morgan Hill Santa Clara 0.015% 0.0124619%
City Mountain View Santa Clara 0.041% 0.0334608%
City Palo Alto Santa Clara 0.039% 0.0323080%
City San Jose Santa Clara 0.294% 0.360% 0.3054960%
City Santa Clara Santa Clara 0.067% 0.0549723%
City Saratoga Santa Clara 0.004% 0.0034161%
City Sunnyvale Santa Clara 0.053% 0.0434069%
County Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz 0.783% 0.957% 0.8135396% City Capitola Santa Cruz 0.020% 0.0168191%
City Santa Cruz Santa Cruz 0.143% 0.1180348%
City Scotts Valley Santa Cruz 0.015% 0.0126525%
City Watsonville Santa Cruz 0.063% 0.0520136%
County Shasta County Shasta 1.095% 1.339% 1.1380191%
City Anderson Shasta 0.024% 0.0198896%
City Redding Shasta 0.284% 0.2334841%
City Shasta Lake Shasta 0.004% 0.0031993%
County Siskiyou County Siskiyou 0.228% 0.279% 0.2373393% County Solano County Solano 0.760% 0.6260795%
City Benicia Solano 0.031% 0.0253903%
City Dixon Solano 0.016% 0.0130849%
City Fairfield Solano 0.109% 0.0897317%
City Suisun City Solano 0.021% 0.0176183%
City Vacaville Solano 0.119% 0.0976497%
City Vallejo Solano 0.167% 0.1373644%
County Sonoma County Sonoma 1.218% 1.490% 1.2661290%
City Healdsburg Sonoma 0.032% 0.0266929%
City Petaluma Sonoma 0.081% 0.0667507%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 167 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
14 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Rohnert Park Sonoma 0.041% 0.0340759%
City Santa Rosa Sonoma 0.184% 0.1519070%
City Sonoma Sonoma 0.022% 0.0183438%
City Windsor Sonoma 0.016% 0.0129298%
County Stanislaus County Stanislaus 1.722% 1.4182273%
City Ceres Stanislaus 0.041% 0.0340260%
City Modesto Stanislaus 0.217% 0.1788759%
City Newman Stanislaus 0.006% 0.0046964%
City Oakdale Stanislaus 0.018% 0.0145531%
City Patterson Stanislaus 0.015% 0.0126590%
City Riverbank Stanislaus 0.010% 0.0085699%
City Turlock Stanislaus 0.065% 0.0531966%
County Sutter County Sutter 0.306% 0.374% 0.3179548%
City Yuba City Sutter 0.074% 0.0606242%
County Tehama County Tehama 0.213% 0.261% 0.2216654%
City Red Bluff Tehama 0.014% 0.0117771%
County Trinity County Trinity 0.082% 0.101% 0.0855476%
County Tulare County Tulare 0.809% 0.990% 0.8410949%
City Dinuba Tulare 0.014% 0.0116929%
City Exeter Tulare 0.004% 0.0032479%
City Farmersville Tulare 0.003% 0.0027879%
City Lindsay Tulare 0.007% 0.0057111%
City Porterville Tulare 0.021% 0.0171845%
City Tulare Tulare 0.037% 0.0302273%
City Visalia Tulare 0.066% 0.0545872%
County Tuolumne County Tuolumne 0.486% 0.594% 0.5047621% County Ventura County Ventura 2.192% 2.681% 2.2781201%
City Camarillo Ventura 0.002% 0.0012815%
City Fillmore Ventura 0.002% 0.0020294%
City Moorpark Ventura 0.008% 0.0067337%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 168 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
15 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Oxnard Ventura 0.156% 0.190% 0.1617338%
City Port Hueneme Ventura 0.021% 0.0174145%
City San Buenaventura (Ventura) Ventura 0.085% 0.0702181% City Santa Paula Ventura 0.014% 0.0119072%
City Simi Valley Ventura 0.065% 0.0533043%
City Thousand Oaks Ventura 0.022% 0.0179902%
County Yolo County Yolo 0.357% 0.437% 0.3713319%
City Davis Yolo 0.055% 0.0451747%
City West Sacramento Yolo 0.066% 0.0544321%
City Woodland Yolo 0.058% 0.0477904%
County Yuba County Yuba 0.214% 0.262% 0.2225679%
City Marysville Yuba 0.014% 0.0112079%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 169 April 11, 2023
1 APPENDIX 2
Cost Reimbursement Procedure

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 170 April 11, 2023
2 i. If a Plaintiff Subdivision is eligible to seek reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in part, from funds available under Section XIV and Exhibit R of the Teva Settlement Agreement, Section XIII and Exhibit R of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the CVS Settlement Agreement, Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, Section X or Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement, or Section XI or Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, it must first make a timely application for reimbursement from such funds. To allow sufficient time for determination of those applications, no claim for Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund under this Agreement may be made before the First Claims Date. ii. A Plaintiff Subdivision that wishes to be reimbursed from the CA Subdivision Fund must submit a claim to the Special Master no later than forty-five (45) days after the First Claims Date. The Special Master will then compile and redistribute the aggregated claim totals for each Plaintiff Subdivision via email to representatives of all the Plaintiff Subdivisions. A claim for attorney and staff time must list, for each attorney or staff member included in the claim, the following information: name, title, total hours claimed, hourly rate (including, if sought, benefits and share of overhead), and narrative summarizing the general nature of the work performed by the attorney or staff member. For reimbursement of “hard” costs, the subdivision may aggregate across a category (e.g., total for travel costs). It is the intention of the Plaintiff Subdivisions that submission of documents related to reimbursement of Costs does not waive any attorney-client privilege or exemptions to the California Public Records Act.
iii. The Special Master may request, at his or her sole option, additional documents or details to assist in the final award of Costs.
iv. The Special Master will review claims for reasonableness and will notify each Plaintiff Subdivision of the final determination of its claim, and will provide a list of all final awards to all Plaintiff Subdivisions by email or, upon request, via First Class U.S. Mail. Any Plaintiff Subdivision may ask the Special Master to reconsider any final award within twenty-one (21) days. The Special Master will make a final determination on any such reconsideration request within thirty (30) days of receipt. v. Any decision of the Special Master is final and binding, and will be considered under the California Arbitration Act, Code of Civil Procedure section 1280 et seq. as a final arbitration award. Nothing in this agreement is intended to expand the scope of judicial review of the final award for errors of fact or law, and the Parties agree that they may only seek to vacate the award if clear and convincing evidence demonstrates one of the factors set forth in Code of Civil Procedure, section 1286.2, subdivision (a). Plaintiff Subdivisions will have fourteen (14) days after all final awards are made, together with any final determination of a request for reconsideration, to seek review in the Superior Court of California, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285, where the State has filed its Consent Judgment.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 171 April 11, 2023
3 vi. The Special Master will prepare a report of Costs that includes his or her fees and expenses at least ninety (90) days before the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Special Master’s preparation of a report of Costs does not discharge a Plaintiff Subdivision’s reporting requirement under Section VIII.C of the Teva Settlement Agreement.
vii. A member of the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee, which is a CA Participating Subdivision, will submit to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Teva a report of the fees and expenses incurred by the Special Master pursuant to Section VIII.C of the Teva Settlement Agreement.
c) Claims Priority and Limitation.
i. The Special Master will submit invoices for compensation of reasonable fees and expenses to the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee no later than ninety (90) days prior to the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Plaintiff Subdivision Committee will promptly review and, if reasonable, approve the Special Master’s invoice for compensation. The Plaintiff Subdivision Committee will submit approved invoices to the Settlement Fund Administrator for payment. The Special Master’s approved invoices have priority and will be paid first from the CA Subdivision Fund before any award of Costs, subject to the limitation in Section

2.c.v below.
ii. Final Awards of Costs that do not exceed seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) will be paid next in priority after the Special Master’s approved invoices.
iii. Final Awards of Costs in excess of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) will be paid proportionally from the funds remaining in that year’s Annual Payment. iv. Any claim for Costs that is not paid in full will be allocated against the next year’s distribution from the CA Subdivision Fund, until all approved claims for Costs are paid in full.
v. In no event will more than 50% of the total CA Subdivision Fund received in any year be used to pay Costs or the Special Master’s approved invoices. vi. In no event shall more than $28 million of the total CA Subdivision Funds paid pursuant to the Teva Settlement Agreement, Allergan Settlement Agreement, Distributor Settlement Agreement, CVS Settlement Agreement, Janssen Settlement Agreement, Walgreens Settlement Agreement, and the Walmart Settlement Agreement be used to pay Costs.
d) Collateral Source Payments and Third-Party Settlement. i. In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision is awarded compensation, in whole or in part, by any source of funds created as a result of litigation against an Opioid Defendant for 4 its reasonable Costs, it will reduce its claim for Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund by that amount. If a Plaintiff Subdivision has already received a DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 172 April 11, 2023
4 final award of Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund, it will repay the fund up to the prior award of Costs via a payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator or notify the Settlement Fund Administrator that its allocation from the next and subsequent Annual Payments should be reduced accordingly. If the Plaintiff Subdivision is repaying any prior award of Costs, that repayment will occur as soon as is feasible after the Plaintiff Subdivision’s receipt of Cost funds from the collateral source, but no more than 90 days after its receipt from the collateral source. The Settlement Fund Administrator will add any repaid Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund. Any Plaintiff Subdivision that has submitted for reimbursement to any national fund and has not received a final determination by the First Claims Date may request that the settlement administrator withhold some or all of its payment from the CA Subdivision Fund in order to avoid repayment.
ii. In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision reaches a monetary settlement or compromise against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement, the monetary portion of such settlement, net of fees paid to outside contingency fee counsel and of funds earmarked strictly for abatement, will be credited against its Costs and the subdivision will be ineligible to recover those credited Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund. Plaintiff Subdivisions negotiating monetary settlements or compromises against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement will negotiate for funds to repay any Costs it previously received from the CA Subdivision Fund or for Costs it otherwise might be eligible to claim from the CA Subdivision Fund. If such a settlement is paid after all final approved claims for Costs by all Plaintiff Subdivisions are satisfied in full, the settling subdivision will reimburse the CA Subdivision Fund in that amount by making payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator to add to the CA Subdivision Fund in a manner consistent with the repayments described in section 2.d.i above.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 173 April 11, 2023
1 APPENDIX 3

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Teva Settlement Agreement and CA Teva Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Teva Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL], together with any contingency fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the national Attorney Fee Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the total gross recovery of [SUBDIVISION] from the Teva Settlement. [COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created under the Teva Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of “State BackStop Agreement” in Exhibit R of the Teva Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between “a Settling State” and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
[DATE] [SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 174 April 11, 2023
1 Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds – CVS Settlement

1. Introduction
Pursuant to the CVS Settlement Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2022, and any revision thereto as well as any modification thereto entered into by the State of California and CVS (the “CVS Settlement Agreement”), including Section V and Exhibit O, the State of California proposes this agreement (the “CA CVS Allocation Agreement”) to govern the allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to Sections IV and V of the CVS Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Sections IX or X of the CVS Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the CVS Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA CVS Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.

2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the CVS Settlement Agreement. b) Allergan Settlement Agreement means the Allergan Settlement Agreement dated November 22, 2022, and any revision thereto.
c) Distributor Settlement Agreement means the Distributor Settlement Agreement dated July 21, 2021, and any revision thereto.
d) Janssen Settlement Agreement means the Janssen Settlement Agreement dated July 21, 2021, and any revision thereto.
e) Teva Settlement Agreement means the Teva Settlement Agreement dated November 22, 2022, and any revision thereto.
f) Walgreens Settlement Agreement means the Walgreens Settlement Agreement dated December 9, 2022, and any revision thereto.
g) Walmart Settlement Agreement means the Walmart Settlement Agreement dated November 14, 2022, and any revision thereto.
h) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in California. CA Litigating Special Districts include Downey Unified School District, Elk Grove Unified School District, Kern High School District, Montezuma Fire Protection District (located in Stockton, California), Santa Barbara San Luis Obispo Regional Health Authority, Inland Empire Health Plan, Health Plan of San Joaquin, San Leandro Unified School District, Pleasant Valley School District Board, and LA Care Health Plan.
i) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 175 April 11, 2023
2 Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020. j) Opioid Defendant means any defendant (including but not limited to Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, and McKesson Corporation) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.

3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the CVS Settlement Agreement, as well as applicable law, and the CVS Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of this CA CVS Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA CVS Allocation Agreement have the same meaning as in the CVS Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.

Pursuant to Section V(E)(1) of the CVS Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section V(B)(2) of the CVS Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.

4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California,1 pursuant to the CVS Settlement Agreement, shall be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA CVS Allocation Agreement, and 15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the “State of California Allocation”), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund (“CA Abatement Accounts Fund”), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund (“CA Subdivision Fund”).
1 For purposes of clarity, use of the term “California” refers to the geographic territory of California and the state and its local governments therein. The term “State” or “State of California” refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 176 April 11, 2023
3 A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by the State for future Opioid Remediation.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 177 April 11, 2023
4 e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered within five years of receipt and in accordance with the CVS Settlement Agreement and this CA CVS Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must be transferred to the State. This provision shall not apply to the Cost Reimbursement Funds, which shall be controlled by Appendix 2.
ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to the CVS Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program; (2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) treatment infrastructure; (3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non-sworn) and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability, restorative justice, and harm reduction; and/or (5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth. c) The California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”) may add to this list (but not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list.
d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the CVS Settlement Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 178 April 11, 2023
5 ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for Opioid Remediation consistent with the CVS Settlement Agreement and this CA CVS Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the CVS Settlement Agreement and this CA CVS Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision’s use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the CVS Settlement Agreement or this CA CVS Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern. c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the Subdivision’s use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise enforce the requirements of the CVS Settlement Agreement or this CA CVS Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this agreement. e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits, investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal enforcement actions.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 179 April 11, 2023
6 C. CA Subdivision Fund
i. Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used, subject to any limits imposed by the CVS Settlement Agreement and this CA CVS Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioidrelated expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation, and to pay the reasonable fees and expenses of the Special Master as set forth in Appendix 2.

D. Provision for State Back-Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) (“MDL Fees Order”) in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) “cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee agreements at 15%.” Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the CVS Settlement Agreement, and, if applicable, the Teva Settlement Agreement, Allergan Settlement Agreement, Distributor Settlement Agreement, Janssen Settlement Agreement, Walgreens Settlement Agreement, and Walmart Settlement Agreement.

A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use its share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency-fee counsel (“State Back-Stop Agreement”), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(Y), of the CVS Settlement Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, so long as such contingency fees do not exceed a total contingency fee of 15% of the total gross recovery of the Plaintiff Subdivision pursuant to the CVS Settlement, inclusive of contingency fees from the national Attorney Fee Fund and this State Back-Stop Agreement. Before seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back-Stop Agreement, private counsel DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 180 April 11, 2023
7 representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the CVS Settlement Agreement. Further, private counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State’s use of funds from the settlement until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the settlement will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the settlement have been used in compliance with the CVS Settlement Agreement and this CA CVS Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions’ expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision. d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and expenditures, as required by the CVS Settlement Agreement and this CA CVS Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used, including if used to pay attorneys’ fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to Section V(B)(2) of the CVS Settlement Agreement, such information must also be reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and CVS.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 181 April 11, 2023
8 e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the State and Participating Subdivisions.

6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA CVS Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the CVS Settlement Agreement, this CA CVS Allocation Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA CVS Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d) Except as provided in the CVS Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 182 April 11, 2023
9 The undersigned, California City city, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – CVS Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the CVS Settlement and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – CVS Settlement. EXECUTED on /date_1_cvs/.

Signature: /signer_1_teva_allergan/
Name: /name_1_teva_allergan/
Title: /title_1_teva_allergan/
Date: /date_1_cvs/
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 Inge Elmes
City Manager
April 11, 2023
183 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds—CVS Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 184 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
1 of 15
100.000% 100.000% 100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Alameda County Alameda 2.332% 2.853% 2.4237952%
City Alameda Alameda 0.069% 0.0570162%
City Albany Alameda 0.013% 0.0107768%
City Berkeley Alameda 0.152% 0.1249656%
City Dublin Alameda 0.033% 0.040% 0.0338810%
City Emeryville Alameda 0.023% 0.0185765%
City Fremont Alameda 0.108% 0.0888576%
City Hayward Alameda 0.117% 0.0966218%
City Livermore Alameda 0.054% 0.0446740%
City Newark Alameda 0.026% 0.0217626%
City Oakland Alameda 0.486% 0.595% 0.5055601%
City Piedmont Alameda 0.014% 0.0114064%
City Pleasanton Alameda 0.067% 0.0554547%
City San Leandro Alameda 0.039% 0.0321267%
City Union City Alameda 0.043% 0.0352484%
County Amador County Amador 0.226% 0.277% 0.2349885%
County Butte County Butte 1.615% 1.975% 1.6783178%
City Chico Butte 0.216% 0.264% 0.2246499%
City Oroville Butte 0.079% 0.0646595%
County Calaveras County Calaveras 0.226% 0.277% 0.2351644% County Colusa County Colusa 0.059% 0.0489221%
County Contra Costa County Contra Costa 2.102% 2.571% 2.1844585% City Antioch Contra Costa 0.037% 0.0301879%
City Brentwood Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0215339%
City Clayton Contra Costa 0.002% 0.0018060%
City Concord Contra Costa 0.055% 0.0456676%
City Danville Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0082255%
City El Cerrito Contra Costa 0.023% 0.0189024%
City Hercules Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0078273%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 185 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
2 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Lafayette Contra Costa 0.006% 0.0046030%
City Martinez Contra Costa 0.012% 0.0098593%
City Moraga Contra Costa 0.004% 0.0031007%
City Oakley Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0079416%
City Orinda Contra Costa 0.005% 0.0038157%
City Pinole Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0110909%
City Pittsburg Contra Costa 0.053% 0.0436369%
City Pleasant Hill Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0106309%
City Richmond Contra Costa 0.146% 0.1201444%
City San Pablo Contra Costa 0.018% 0.0148843%
City San Ramon Contra Costa 0.021% 0.0176459%
City Walnut Creek Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0212132%
County Del Norte County Del Norte 0.114% 0.140% 0.1189608% County El Dorado County El Dorado 0.768% 0.939% 0.7980034% City Placerville El Dorado 0.015% 0.0127642%
City South Lake Tahoe El Dorado 0.081% 0.0665456%
County Fresno County Fresno 1.895% 2.318% 1.9693410%
City Clovis Fresno 0.065% 0.0536211%
City Coalinga Fresno 0.012% 0.0098554%
City Fresno Fresno 0.397% 0.3270605%
City Kerman Fresno 0.005% 0.0042534%
City Kingsburg Fresno 0.008% 0.0066167%
City Mendota Fresno 0.002% 0.0019387%
City Orange Cove Fresno 0.004% 0.0035607%
City Parlier Fresno 0.008% 0.0069755%
City Reedley Fresno 0.012% 0.0098804%
City Sanger Fresno 0.018% 0.0146135%
City Selma Fresno 0.015% 0.0127537%
County Glenn County Glenn 0.107% 0.131% 0.1116978%
County Humboldt County Humboldt 1.030% 1.260% 1.0703185% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 186 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
3 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Arcata Humboldt 0.054% 0.0447660%
City Eureka Humboldt 0.117% 0.143% 0.1216284%
City Fortuna Humboldt 0.032% 0.0266837%
County Imperial County Imperial 0.258% 0.315% 0.2679006% City Brawley Imperial 0.011% 0.0087986%
City Calexico Imperial 0.019% 0.0152799%
City El Centro Imperial 0.158% 0.1302522%
City Imperial Imperial 0.006% 0.0048791%
County Inyo County Inyo 0.073% 0.089% 0.0754413%
County Kern County Kern 2.517% 3.079% 2.6159145%
City Arvin Kern 0.006% 0.0046425%
City Bakersfield Kern 0.212% 0.1747198%
City California City Kern 0.009% 0.0070820%
City Delano Kern 0.030% 0.0249316%
City McFarland Kern 0.003% 0.0025644%
City Ridgecrest Kern 0.015% 0.0120938%
City Shafter Kern 0.013% 0.0103417%
City Tehachapi Kern 0.009% 0.0073580%
City Wasco Kern 0.008% 0.0069861%
County Kings County Kings 0.293% 0.2413469%
City Avenal Kings 0.007% 0.0056335%
City Corcoran Kings 0.013% 0.0107032%
City Hanford Kings 0.027% 0.0226038%
City Lemoore Kings 0.016% 0.0131900%
County Lake County Lake 0.795% 0.6545389%
City Clearlake Lake 0.041% 0.050% 0.0426253%
City Lakeport Lake 0.021% 0.026% 0.0222964%
County Lassen County Lassen 0.319% 0.391% 0.3320610%
City Susanville Lassen 0.027% 0.0219295%
County Los Angeles County Los Angeles 13.896% 16.999% 14.4437559% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 187 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
4 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Agoura Hills Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040024%
City Alhambra Los Angeles 0.042% 0.0343309%
City Arcadia Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0267718%
City Artesia Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0005100%
City Azusa Los Angeles 0.026% 0.0210857%
City Baldwin Park Los Angeles 0.027% 0.0218520%
City Bell Los Angeles 0.008% 0.0068783%
City Bellflower Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0014485%
City Bell Gardens Los Angeles 0.014% 0.0114301%
City Beverly Hills Los Angeles 0.065% 0.0534897%
City Burbank Los Angeles 0.100% 0.0823132%
City Calabasas Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048948%
City Carson Los Angeles 0.019% 0.0159805%
City Cerritos Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039682%
City Claremont Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0082584%
City Commerce Los Angeles 0.000% 0.0002971%
City Compton Los Angeles 0.044% 0.0361882%
City Covina Los Angeles 0.028% 0.0229127%
City Cudahy Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006020%
City Culver City Los Angeles 0.055% 0.0449894%
City Diamond Bar Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006993%
City Downey Los Angeles 0.052% 0.0429994%
City Duarte Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0027261%
City El Monte Los Angeles 0.031% 0.038% 0.0318985%
City El Segundo Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0268020%
City Gardena Los Angeles 0.034% 0.0278088%
City Glendale Los Angeles 0.166% 0.1366586%
City Glendora Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134411%
City Hawaiian Gardens Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040549%
City Hawthorne Los Angeles 0.050% 0.0407833%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 188 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
5 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Hermosa Beach Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0145307%
City Huntington Park Los Angeles 0.023% 0.0190667%
City Inglewood Los Angeles 0.059% 0.0489195%
City La Cañada Flintridge Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0025565% City Lakewood Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039971%
City La Mirada Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0081572%
City Lancaster Los Angeles 0.045% 0.0369689%
City La Puente Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012999%
City La Verne Los Angeles 0.024% 0.0194190%
City Lawndale Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0017731%
City Lomita Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0031940%
City Long Beach Los Angeles 0.439% 0.3614151%
City Los Angeles Los Angeles 2.715% 3.321% 2.8218811%
City Lynwood Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134345%
City Malibu Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0019269%
City Manhattan Beach Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260686%
City Maywood Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0035528%
City Monrovia Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0254455%
City Montebello Los Angeles 0.030% 0.0250670%
City Monterey Park Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0256677%
City Norwalk Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0258228%
City Palmdale Los Angeles 0.046% 0.0375827%
City Palos Verdes Estates Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0053102% City Paramount Los Angeles 0.011% 0.0091483%
City Pasadena Los Angeles 0.146% 0.1200524%
City Pico Rivera Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0183333%
City Pomona Los Angeles 0.111% 0.0911933%
City Rancho Palos Verdes Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012645%
City Redondo Beach Los Angeles 0.062% 0.0506992%
City Rosemead Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0028260%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 189 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
6 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City San Dimas Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0022016%
City San Fernando Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0104837%
City San Gabriel Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0147726%
City San Marino Los Angeles 0.009% 0.0073791%
City Santa Clarita Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0178167%
City Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0257531%
City Santa Monica Los Angeles 0.158% 0.1298513%
City Sierra Madre Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048646%
City Signal Hill Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0084884%
City South El Monte Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039603%
City South Gate Los Angeles 0.020% 0.0166272%
City South Pasadena Los Angeles 0.012% 0.0095334%
City Temple City Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039498%
City Torrance Los Angeles 0.112% 0.0919820%
City Walnut Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0047305%
City West Covina Los Angeles 0.049% 0.0404521%
City West Hollywood Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0108517%
City Whittier Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260581%
County Madera County Madera 0.349% 0.427% 0.3630669%
City Chowchilla Madera 0.012% 0.0097332%
City Madera Madera 0.039% 0.0318441%
County Marin County Marin 0.564% 0.690% 0.5861325%
City Larkspur Marin 0.015% 0.0124697%
City Mill Valley Marin 0.020% 0.0168401%
City Novato Marin 0.028% 0.0229824%
City San Anselmo Marin 0.009% 0.0078062%
City San Rafael Marin 0.089% 0.0729823%
County Mariposa County Mariposa 0.084% 0.103% 0.0876131% County Mendocino County Mendocino 0.439% 0.536% 0.4558394% City Ukiah Mendocino 0.039% 0.0317153%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 190 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
7 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Merced County Merced 0.551% 0.674% 0.5724262%
City Atwater Merced 0.024% 0.0195846%
City Livingston Merced 0.006% 0.0045873%
City Los Banos Merced 0.020% 0.0165142%
City Merced Merced 0.061% 0.0500762%
County Modoc County Modoc 0.065% 0.080% 0.0678250%
County Mono County Mono 0.023% 0.029% 0.0242606%
County Monterey County Monterey 0.908% 1.111% 0.9437083% City Greenfield Monterey 0.006% 0.0050552%
City King City Monterey 0.005% 0.0037355%
City Marina Monterey 0.017% 0.0144098%
City Monterey Monterey 0.041% 0.0336540%
City Pacific Grove Monterey 0.009% 0.0074842%
City Salinas Monterey 0.094% 0.0776576%
City Seaside Monterey 0.023% 0.0191772%
City Soledad Monterey 0.007% 0.0060870%
County Napa County Napa 0.288% 0.352% 0.2994325%
City American Canyon Napa 0.017% 0.0136869%
City Napa Napa 0.078% 0.0642783%
County Nevada County Nevada 0.441% 0.539% 0.4579827%
City Grass Valley Nevada 0.024% 0.0197805%
City Truckee Nevada 0.003% 0.0023843%
County Orange County Orange 4.364% 5.339% 4.5363576%
City Aliso Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0113841%
City Anaheim Orange 0.554% 0.678% 0.5759282%
City Brea Orange 0.086% 0.0708897%
City Buena Park Orange 0.087% 0.0714352%
City Costa Mesa Orange 0.124% 0.152% 0.1288366%
City Cypress Orange 0.033% 0.0271937%
City Dana Point Orange 0.001% 0.0005560%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 191 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
8 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Fountain Valley Orange 0.055% 0.0455980%
City Fullerton Orange 0.137% 0.168% 0.1425744%
City Garden Grove Orange 0.213% 0.1752482%
City Huntington Beach Orange 0.247% 0.302% 0.2568420%
City Irvine Orange 0.139% 0.170% 0.1442350%
City Laguna Beach Orange 0.047% 0.058% 0.0493043%
City Laguna Hills Orange 0.014% 0.0115457%
City Laguna Niguel Orange 0.001% 0.0007071%
City Laguna Woods Orange 0.001% 0.0006546%
City La Habra Orange 0.060% 0.073% 0.0621049%
City Lake Forest Orange 0.012% 0.0101249%
City La Palma Orange 0.012% 0.0095439%
City Los Alamitos Orange 0.008% 0.0069190%
City Mission Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0117560%
City Newport Beach Orange 0.179% 0.1470134%
City Orange Orange 0.150% 0.1231320%
City Placentia Orange 0.029% 0.035% 0.0298912%
City Rancho Santa Margarita Orange 0.001% 0.0006296%
City San Clemente Orange 0.008% 0.010% 0.0086083%
City San Juan Capistrano Orange 0.008% 0.0065510%
City Santa Ana Orange 0.502% 0.614% 0.5213866%
City Seal Beach Orange 0.020% 0.0165891%
City Stanton Orange 0.035% 0.0291955%
City Tustin Orange 0.073% 0.0600341%
City Westminster Orange 0.104% 0.127% 0.1082721%
City Yorba Linda Orange 0.044% 0.0362223%
County Placer County Placer 1.045% 1.278% 1.0861002%
City Auburn Placer 0.017% 0.0141114%
City Lincoln Placer 0.031% 0.0255599%
City Rocklin Placer 0.076% 0.0625485%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 192 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
9 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Roseville Placer 0.196% 0.1616559%
County Plumas County Plumas 0.205% 0.251% 0.2128729%
County Riverside County Riverside 4.534% 5.547% 4.7128296% City Banning Riverside 0.017% 0.0143848%
City Beaumont Riverside 0.021% 0.0171135%
City Blythe Riverside 0.012% 0.0096714%
City Canyon Lake Riverside 0.000% 0.0001761%
City Cathedral City Riverside 0.067% 0.0553614%
City Coachella Riverside 0.021% 0.0173054%
City Corona Riverside 0.147% 0.1207083%
City Desert Hot Springs Riverside 0.024% 0.0200433%
City Eastvale Riverside 0.000% 0.0002747%
City Hemet Riverside 0.051% 0.0421792%
City Indio Riverside 0.056% 0.0457794%
City Jurupa Valley Riverside 0.001% 0.0008991%
City Lake Elsinore Riverside 0.021% 0.0172949%
City La Quinta Riverside 0.063% 0.0516732%
City Menifee Riverside 0.032% 0.0260909%
City Moreno Valley Riverside 0.137% 0.1130348%
City Murrieta Riverside 0.048% 0.059% 0.0497423%
City Norco Riverside 0.016% 0.0134542%
City Palm Desert Riverside 0.083% 0.0682465%
City Palm Springs Riverside 0.076% 0.0629862%
City Perris Riverside 0.009% 0.0076774%
City Rancho Mirage Riverside 0.052% 0.0431098%
City Riverside Riverside 0.268% 0.2206279%
City San Jacinto Riverside 0.010% 0.0085936%
City Temecula Riverside 0.022% 0.0180086%
City Wildomar Riverside 0.008% 0.0062500%
County Sacramento County Sacramento 3.797% 4.645% 3.9465887% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 193 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
10 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Citrus Heights Sacramento 0.057% 0.0465312%
City Elk Grove Sacramento 0.130% 0.1066994%
City Folsom Sacramento 0.108% 0.0890850%
City Galt Sacramento 0.017% 0.0143704%
City Rancho Cordova Sacramento 0.008% 0.0067679%
City Sacramento Sacramento 0.721% 0.882% 0.7496530%
County San Benito County San Benito 0.106% 0.130% 0.1101417% City Hollister San Benito 0.027% 0.0225355%
County San Bernardino County San Bernardino 3.259% 3.987% 3.3878124% City Adelanto San Bernardino 0.008% 0.0066640%
City Apple Valley San Bernardino 0.025% 0.0207360%
City Barstow San Bernardino 0.015% 0.0122056%
City Chino San Bernardino 0.064% 0.0525893%
City Chino Hills San Bernardino 0.001% 0.0006388%
City Colton San Bernardino 0.031% 0.0253443%
City Fontana San Bernardino 0.112% 0.0920543%
City Grand Terrace San Bernardino 0.006% 0.0051051%
City Hesperia San Bernardino 0.035% 0.0291522%
City Highland San Bernardino 0.004% 0.0029061%
City Loma Linda San Bernardino 0.009% 0.0071188%
City Montclair San Bernardino 0.039% 0.0322108%
City Ontario San Bernardino 0.179% 0.1472934%
City Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino 0.084% 0.0689431%
City Redlands San Bernardino 0.057% 0.0469150%
City Rialto San Bernardino 0.073% 0.0603206%
City San Bernardino San Bernardino 0.178% 0.1461880%
City Twentynine Palms San Bernardino 0.002% 0.0012605%
City Upland San Bernardino 0.052% 0.0424460%
City Victorville San Bernardino 0.033% 0.0269400%
City Yucaipa San Bernardino 0.016% 0.0128772%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 194 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
11 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Yucca Valley San Bernardino 0.003% 0.0021228%
County San Diego County San Diego 5.706% 6.980% 5.9309748% City Carlsbad San Diego 0.128% 0.1050485%
City Chula Vista San Diego 0.189% 0.231% 0.1961456%
City Coronado San Diego 0.044% 0.0359095%
City El Cajon San Diego 0.113% 0.0933582%
City Encinitas San Diego 0.061% 0.074% 0.0630289%
City Escondido San Diego 0.145% 0.1192204%
City Imperial Beach San Diego 0.014% 0.0118283%
City La Mesa San Diego 0.055% 0.068% 0.0575593%
City Lemon Grove San Diego 0.022% 0.0183911%
City National City San Diego 0.080% 0.0656808%
City Oceanside San Diego 0.213% 0.1753428%
City Poway San Diego 0.062% 0.0511040%
City San Diego San Diego 1.975% 2.416% 2.0531169%
City San Marcos San Diego 0.089% 0.0733897%
City Santee San Diego 0.033% 0.0268401%
City Solana Beach San Diego 0.017% 0.0138564%
City Vista San Diego 0.052% 0.0425144%
Consolidated San Francisco San Francisco 3.026% 3.702% 3.1457169% County San Joaquin County San Joaquin 1.680% 2.055% 1.7460399% City Lathrop San Joaquin 0.009% 0.0075394%
City Lodi San Joaquin 0.053% 0.0439484%
City Manteca San Joaquin 0.054% 0.0443454%
City Ripon San Joaquin 0.013% 0.0104219%
City Stockton San Joaquin 0.313% 0.383% 0.3256176%
City Tracy San Joaquin 0.084% 0.0692047%
County San Luis Obispo County San Luis Obispo 0.816% 0.999% 0.8484126% City Arroyo Grande San Luis Obispo 0.024% 0.0199053%
City Atascadero San Luis Obispo 0.029% 0.0240680%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 195 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
12 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles) San Luis Obispo 0.043% 0.0353456% City Grover Beach San Luis Obispo 0.017% 0.0137881%
City Morro Bay San Luis Obispo 0.020% 0.0160922%
City San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo 0.077% 0.0637841%
County San Mateo County San Mateo 1.074% 1.313% 1.1159599% City Belmont San Mateo 0.021% 0.0169860%
City Burlingame San Mateo 0.019% 0.0152537%
City Daly City San Mateo 0.044% 0.0363880%
City East Palo Alto San Mateo 0.013% 0.0103982%
City Foster City San Mateo 0.020% 0.0166101%
City Half Moon Bay San Mateo 0.004% 0.0031638%
City Hillsborough San Mateo 0.013% 0.0110029%
City Menlo Park San Mateo 0.015% 0.0126209%
City Millbrae San Mateo 0.013% 0.0105836%
City Pacifica San Mateo 0.016% 0.0130625%
City Redwood City San Mateo 0.056% 0.0463511%
City San Bruno San Mateo 0.021% 0.0172161%
City San Carlos San Mateo 0.013% 0.0108885%
City San Mateo San Mateo 0.052% 0.0425841%
City South San Francisco San Mateo 0.043% 0.0353943%
County Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara 1.132% 1.385% 1.1768968% City Carpinteria Santa Barbara 0.001% 0.0008938%
City Goleta Santa Barbara 0.004% 0.0028969%
City Lompoc Santa Barbara 0.047% 0.0389379%
City Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 0.122% 0.1004559%
City Santa Maria Santa Barbara 0.058% 0.0479179%
County Santa Clara County Santa Clara 2.404% 2.941% 2.4987553% City Campbell Santa Clara 0.014% 0.0112566%
City Cupertino Santa Clara 0.008% 0.0066824%
City Gilroy Santa Clara 0.025% 0.0202891%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 196 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
13 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Los Altos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103338%
City Los Gatos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103220%
City Milpitas Santa Clara 0.036% 0.0298120%
City Morgan Hill Santa Clara 0.015% 0.0124619%
City Mountain View Santa Clara 0.041% 0.0334608%
City Palo Alto Santa Clara 0.039% 0.0323080%
City San Jose Santa Clara 0.294% 0.360% 0.3054960%
City Santa Clara Santa Clara 0.067% 0.0549723%
City Saratoga Santa Clara 0.004% 0.0034161%
City Sunnyvale Santa Clara 0.053% 0.0434069%
County Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz 0.783% 0.957% 0.8135396% City Capitola Santa Cruz 0.020% 0.0168191%
City Santa Cruz Santa Cruz 0.143% 0.1180348%
City Scotts Valley Santa Cruz 0.015% 0.0126525%
City Watsonville Santa Cruz 0.063% 0.0520136%
County Shasta County Shasta 1.095% 1.339% 1.1380191%
City Anderson Shasta 0.024% 0.0198896%
City Redding Shasta 0.284% 0.2334841%
City Shasta Lake Shasta 0.004% 0.0031993%
County Siskiyou County Siskiyou 0.228% 0.279% 0.2373393% County Solano County Solano 0.760% 0.6260795%
City Benicia Solano 0.031% 0.0253903%
City Dixon Solano 0.016% 0.0130849%
City Fairfield Solano 0.109% 0.0897317%
City Suisun City Solano 0.021% 0.0176183%
City Vacaville Solano 0.119% 0.0976497%
City Vallejo Solano 0.167% 0.1373644%
County Sonoma County Sonoma 1.218% 1.490% 1.2661290%
City Healdsburg Sonoma 0.032% 0.0266929%
City Petaluma Sonoma 0.081% 0.0667507%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 197 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
14 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Rohnert Park Sonoma 0.041% 0.0340759%
City Santa Rosa Sonoma 0.184% 0.1519070%
City Sonoma Sonoma 0.022% 0.0183438%
City Windsor Sonoma 0.016% 0.0129298%
County Stanislaus County Stanislaus 1.722% 1.4182273%
City Ceres Stanislaus 0.041% 0.0340260%
City Modesto Stanislaus 0.217% 0.1788759%
City Newman Stanislaus 0.006% 0.0046964%
City Oakdale Stanislaus 0.018% 0.0145531%
City Patterson Stanislaus 0.015% 0.0126590%
City Riverbank Stanislaus 0.010% 0.0085699%
City Turlock Stanislaus 0.065% 0.0531966%
County Sutter County Sutter 0.306% 0.374% 0.3179548%
City Yuba City Sutter 0.074% 0.0606242%
County Tehama County Tehama 0.213% 0.261% 0.2216654%
City Red Bluff Tehama 0.014% 0.0117771%
County Trinity County Trinity 0.082% 0.101% 0.0855476%
County Tulare County Tulare 0.809% 0.990% 0.8410949%
City Dinuba Tulare 0.014% 0.0116929%
City Exeter Tulare 0.004% 0.0032479%
City Farmersville Tulare 0.003% 0.0027879%
City Lindsay Tulare 0.007% 0.0057111%
City Porterville Tulare 0.021% 0.0171845%
City Tulare Tulare 0.037% 0.0302273%
City Visalia Tulare 0.066% 0.0545872%
County Tuolumne County Tuolumne 0.486% 0.594% 0.5047621% County Ventura County Ventura 2.192% 2.681% 2.2781201%
City Camarillo Ventura 0.002% 0.0012815%
City Fillmore Ventura 0.002% 0.0020294%
City Moorpark Ventura 0.008% 0.0067337%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 198 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
15 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Oxnard Ventura 0.156% 0.190% 0.1617338%
City Port Hueneme Ventura 0.021% 0.0174145%
City San Buenaventura (Ventura) Ventura 0.085% 0.0702181% City Santa Paula Ventura 0.014% 0.0119072%
City Simi Valley Ventura 0.065% 0.0533043%
City Thousand Oaks Ventura 0.022% 0.0179902%
County Yolo County Yolo 0.357% 0.437% 0.3713319%
City Davis Yolo 0.055% 0.0451747%
City West Sacramento Yolo 0.066% 0.0544321%
City Woodland Yolo 0.058% 0.0477904%
County Yuba County Yuba 0.214% 0.262% 0.2225679%
City Marysville Yuba 0.014% 0.0112079%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 199 April 11, 2023
1 6
APPENDIX 2
Cost Reimbursement Procedure

Costs does not include attorneys’ fees, costs, or expenses incurred by private contingency fee counsel. No part of the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be used to reimburse Costs.
b) First Claims Date means October 1, 2023 or when all applications for reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in part, from funds available under Section X and Exhibit R of the CVS Settlement Agreement, Section XIV and Exhibit R of the Teva Settlement Agreement, Section XIII and Exhibit R of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement, Section XI and Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, or Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, have been finally determined under the provisions of those agreements, whichever comes first.
c) Special Master means a retired judicial officer or former public lawyer, not presently employed or retained by a Plaintiff Subdivision, who will aggregate, review, and determine the reasonable Costs to be awarded to each Plaintiff Subdivision that submits a claim for reimbursement of Costs. The Special Master will be selected by a majority vote of the votes cast by Plaintiff Subdivisions, with each such subdivision having one vote. d) Plaintiff Subdivision Committee means the committee of Plaintiff Subdivisions that will review and approve the invoices submitted by the Special Master reflecting his or her reasonable time and expenses.

2. Cost Reimbursement to Plaintiff Subdivision
a) Purpose. Substantial resources have been expended to hold Opioid Defendants accountable for creating and profiting from the opioid crisis, and this effort has been a significant catalyst in creating National Opioid Settlements with various manufacturers, distributors, and chain pharmacies.
b) Claims Procedure.
i. If a Plaintiff Subdivision is eligible to seek reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in part, from funds available under Section X and Exhibit R of the CVS Settlement DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 200 April 11, 2023
1 7
Agreement, Section XIV and Exhibit R of the Teva Settlement Agreement, Section XIII and Exhibit R of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, Section X or Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement, or Section XI or Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, it must first make a timely application for reimbursement from such funds. To allow sufficient time for determination of those applications, no claim for Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund under this Agreement may be made before the First Claims Date. ii. A Plaintiff Subdivision that wishes to be reimbursed from the CA Subdivision Fund must submit a claim to the Special Master no later than forty-five (45) days after the First Claims Date. The Special Master will then compile and redistribute the aggregated claim totals for each Plaintiff Subdivision via email to representatives of all the Plaintiff Subdivisions. A claim for attorney and staff time must list, for each attorney or staff member included in the claim, the following information: name, title, total hours claimed, hourly rate (including, if sought, benefits and share of overhead), and narrative summarizing the general nature of the work performed by the attorney or staff member. For reimbursement of “hard” costs, the subdivision may aggregate across a category (e.g., total for travel costs). It is the intention of the Plaintiff Subdivisions that submission of documents related to reimbursement of Costs does not waive any attorney-client privilege or exemptions to the California Public Records Act.
iii. The Special Master may request, at his or her sole option, additional documents or details to assist in the final award of Costs.
iv. The Special Master will review claims for reasonableness and will notify each Plaintiff Subdivision of the final determination of its claim, and will provide a list of all final awards to all Plaintiff Subdivisions by email or, upon request, via First Class U.S. Mail. Any Plaintiff Subdivision may ask the Special Master to reconsider any final award within twenty-one (21) days. The Special Master will make a final determination on any such reconsideration request within thirty (30) days of receipt.
v. Any decision of the Special Master is final and binding, and will be considered under the California Arbitration Act, Code of Civil Procedure section 1280 et seq. as a final arbitration award. Nothing in this agreement is intended to expand the scope of judicial review of the final award for errors of fact or law, and the Parties agree that they may only seek to vacate the award if clear and convincing evidence demonstrates one of the factors set forth in Code of Civil Procedure, section 1286.2, subdivision (a). Plaintiff Subdivisions will have fourteen (14) days after all final awards are made, together with any final determination of a request for DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 201 April 11, 2023
1 8
reconsideration, to seek review in the Superior Court of California, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285, where the State has filed its Consent Judgment. vi. The Special Master will prepare a report of Costs that includes his or her fees and expenses at least ninety (90) days before the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Special Master’s preparation of a report of Costs does not discharge a Plaintiff Subdivision’s reporting requirement under Section V(B)(2) of the CVS Settlement Agreement.
vii. A member of the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee, which is a CA Participating Subdivision, will submit to the Settlement Fund Administrator and CVS a report of the fees and expenses incurred by the Special Master pursuant to Section V(B)(2) of the CVS Settlement Agreement.
c) Claims Priority and Limitation.
i. The Special Master will submit invoices for compensation of reasonable fees and expenses to the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee no later than ninety (90) days prior to the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Plaintiff Subdivision Committee will promptly review and, if reasonable, approve the Special Master’s invoice for compensation. The Plaintiff Subdivision Committee will submit approved invoices to the Settlement Fund Administrator for payment. The Special Master’s approved invoices have priority and will be paid first from the CA Subdivision Fund before any award of Costs, subject to the limitation in Section

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 202 April 11, 2023
1 9
d) Collateral Source Payments and Third-Party Settlement. i. In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision is awarded compensation, in whole or in part, by any source of funds created as a result of litigation against an Opioid Defendant for its reasonable Costs, it will reduce its claim for Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund by that amount. If a Plaintiff Subdivision has already received a final award of Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund, it will repay the fund up to the prior award of Costs via a payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator or notify the Settlement Fund Administrator that its allocation from the next and subsequent Annual Payments should be reduced accordingly. If the Plaintiff Subdivision is repaying any prior award of Costs, that repayment will occur as soon as is feasible after the Plaintiff Subdivision’s receipt of Cost funds from the collateral source, but no more than 90 days after its receipt from the collateral source. The Settlement Fund Administrator will add any repaid Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund. Any Plaintiff Subdivision that has submitted for reimbursement to any national fund and has not received a final determination by the First Claims Date may request that the settlement administrator withhold some or all of its payment from the CA Subdivision Fund in order to avoid repayment.
ii. In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision reaches a monetary settlement or compromise against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement, the monetary portion of such settlement, net of fees paid to outside contingency fee counsel and of funds earmarked strictly for abatement, will be credited against its Costs and the subdivision will be ineligible to recover those credited Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund. Plaintiff Subdivisions negotiating monetary settlements or compromises against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement will negotiate for funds to repay any Costs it previously received from the CA Subdivision Fund or for Costs it otherwise might be eligible to claim from the CA Subdivision Fund. If such a settlement is paid after all final approved claims for Costs by all Plaintiff Subdivisions are satisfied in full, the settling subdivision will reimburse the CA Subdivision Fund in that amount by making payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator to add to the CA Subdivision Fund in a manner consistent with the repayments described in section 2.d.i above.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 203 April 11, 2023
1 APPENDIX 3

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the CVS Settlement Agreement and CA CVS Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the CVS Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL], together with any contingency fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the national Attorney Fee Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the total gross recovery of [SUBDIVISION] from the CVS Settlement. [COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created under the CVS Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of “State BackStop Agreement” in Exhibit R of the CVS Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between “a Settling State” and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
[DATE] [SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 204 April 11, 2023
1 Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds – Walgreens Settlement

1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2022, and any revision thereto (the “Walgreens Settlement Agreement”), including Section V and Exhibit O, the State of California proposes this agreement (the “CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement”) to govern the allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to Sections IV and V of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Section IX of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.

2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Walgreens Settlement Agreement.
b) Allergan Settlement Agreement means the Allergan Settlement Agreement dated November 22, 2022, and any revision thereto.
c) CVS Settlement Agreement means the CVS Settlement Agreement dated December 9, 2022, and any revision thereto as well as any modification thereto entered into by the State of California and CVS.
d) Distributor Settlement Agreement means the Distributor Settlement Agreement dated July 21, 2021, and any revision thereto.
e) Janssen Settlement Agreement means the Janssen Settlement Agreement dated July 21, 2021, and any revision thereto.
f) Teva Settlement Agreement means the Teva Settlement Agreement dated November 22, 2022, and any revision thereto.
g) Walmart Settlement Agreement means the Walmart Settlement Agreement dated November 14, 2022, and any revision thereto.
h) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in California. CA Litigating Special Districts include Downey Unified School District, Elk Grove Unified School District, Kern High School District, Montezuma Fire Protection District (located in Stockton, California), Santa Barbara San Luis Obispo Regional Health Authority, Inland Empire Health Plan, Health Plan of San Joaquin, San Leandro Unified School District, DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 205 April 11, 2023
2 Pleasant Valley School District Board, and LA Care Health Plan. i) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020. j) Opioid Defendant means any defendant (including but not limited to Walgreen Co., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walmart Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, and McKesson Corporation) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.

3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, as well as applicable law, and the Walgreens Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement have the same meaning as in the Walgreens Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.

Pursuant to Section V(D)(1) of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section V(B)(2) of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.

4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California,1pursuant to the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, shall be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement, and 15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the “State of California Allocation”), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund (“CA Abatement Accounts Fund”), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund (“CA Subdivision Fund”). 1 For purposes of clarity, use of the term “California” refers to the geographic territory of California and the state and its local governments therein. The term “State” or “State of California” refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 206 April 11, 2023
3 A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by the State for future Opioid Remediation.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 207 April 11, 2023
4 e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Walgreens Settlement Agreement and this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must be transferred to the State. This provision shall not apply to the Cost Reimbursement Funds, which shall be controlled by Appendix 2.
ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to the Walgreens Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program; (2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) treatment infrastructure; (3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non-sworn) and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability, restorative justice, and harm reduction; and/or (5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth. c) The California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”) may add to this list (but not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list.
d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 208 April 11, 2023
5 ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for Opioid Remediation consistent with the Walgreens Settlement Agreement and this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Walgreens Settlement Agreement and this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision’s use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Walgreens Settlement Agreement or this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern.
c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the Subdivision’s use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise enforce the requirements of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement or this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this agreement.
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits, investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal enforcement actions.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 209 April 11, 2023
6 C. CA Subdivision Fund
i. Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used, subject to any limits imposed by the Walgreens Settlement Agreement and this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid-related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation, and to pay the reasonable fees and expenses of the Special Master as set forth in Appendix 2.

D. Provision for State Back-Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) (“MDL Fees Order”) in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) “cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee agreements at 15%.” Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, and, if applicable, the Teva Settlement Agreement, Allergan Settlement Agreement, CVS Settlement Agreement, Distributor Settlement Agreement, Janssen Settlement Agreement, and Walmart Settlement Agreement.

Before seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back-Stop Agreement, private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Walgreens Settlement Agreement. Further, DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 210 April 11, 2023
7 private counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State’s use of funds from the settlement until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the settlement will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the settlement have been used in compliance with the Walgreens Settlement Agreement and this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions’ expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision. d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and expenditures, as required by the Walgreens Settlement Agreement and this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used, including if used to pay attorneys’ fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to Section V(B)(2) of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, such information must also be reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Walgreens.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 211 April 11, 2023
8 e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the State and Participating Subdivisions.

6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d) Except as provided in the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 212 April 11, 2023
9 The undersigned, California City city, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Walgreens Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Walgreens Settlement and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Walgreens Settlement. EXECUTED on /date_1_walgreens/.

Signature: /signer_1_teva_allergan/
Name: /name_1_teva_allergan/
Title: /title_1_teva_allergan/
Date: /date_1_walgreens/
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 Inge Elmes
City Manager
April 11, 2023
213 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds—Walgreens Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change. Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 214 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
1 of 15
100.000% 100.000% 100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Alameda County Alameda 2.332% 2.853% 2.4237952%
City Alameda Alameda 0.069% 0.0570162%
City Albany Alameda 0.013% 0.0107768%
City Berkeley Alameda 0.152% 0.1249656%
City Dublin Alameda 0.033% 0.040% 0.0338810%
City Emeryville Alameda 0.023% 0.0185765%
City Fremont Alameda 0.108% 0.0888576%
City Hayward Alameda 0.117% 0.0966218%
City Livermore Alameda 0.054% 0.0446740%
City Newark Alameda 0.026% 0.0217626%
City Oakland Alameda 0.486% 0.595% 0.5055601%
City Piedmont Alameda 0.014% 0.0114064%
City Pleasanton Alameda 0.067% 0.0554547%
City San Leandro Alameda 0.039% 0.0321267%
City Union City Alameda 0.043% 0.0352484%
County Amador County Amador 0.226% 0.277% 0.2349885%
County Butte County Butte 1.615% 1.975% 1.6783178%
City Chico Butte 0.216% 0.264% 0.2246499%
City Oroville Butte 0.079% 0.0646595%
County Calaveras County Calaveras 0.226% 0.277% 0.2351644% County Colusa County Colusa 0.059% 0.0489221%
County Contra Costa County Contra Costa 2.102% 2.571% 2.1844585% City Antioch Contra Costa 0.037% 0.0301879%
City Brentwood Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0215339%
City Clayton Contra Costa 0.002% 0.0018060%
City Concord Contra Costa 0.055% 0.0456676%
City Danville Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0082255%
City El Cerrito Contra Costa 0.023% 0.0189024%
City Hercules Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0078273%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 215 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
2 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Lafayette Contra Costa 0.006% 0.0046030%
City Martinez Contra Costa 0.012% 0.0098593%
City Moraga Contra Costa 0.004% 0.0031007%
City Oakley Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0079416%
City Orinda Contra Costa 0.005% 0.0038157%
City Pinole Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0110909%
City Pittsburg Contra Costa 0.053% 0.0436369%
City Pleasant Hill Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0106309%
City Richmond Contra Costa 0.146% 0.1201444%
City San Pablo Contra Costa 0.018% 0.0148843%
City San Ramon Contra Costa 0.021% 0.0176459%
City Walnut Creek Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0212132%
County Del Norte County Del Norte 0.114% 0.140% 0.1189608% County El Dorado County El Dorado 0.768% 0.939% 0.7980034% City Placerville El Dorado 0.015% 0.0127642%
City South Lake Tahoe El Dorado 0.081% 0.0665456%
County Fresno County Fresno 1.895% 2.318% 1.9693410%
City Clovis Fresno 0.065% 0.0536211%
City Coalinga Fresno 0.012% 0.0098554%
City Fresno Fresno 0.397% 0.3270605%
City Kerman Fresno 0.005% 0.0042534%
City Kingsburg Fresno 0.008% 0.0066167%
City Mendota Fresno 0.002% 0.0019387%
City Orange Cove Fresno 0.004% 0.0035607%
City Parlier Fresno 0.008% 0.0069755%
City Reedley Fresno 0.012% 0.0098804%
City Sanger Fresno 0.018% 0.0146135%
City Selma Fresno 0.015% 0.0127537%
County Glenn County Glenn 0.107% 0.131% 0.1116978%
County Humboldt County Humboldt 1.030% 1.260% 1.0703185% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 216 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
3 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Arcata Humboldt 0.054% 0.0447660%
City Eureka Humboldt 0.117% 0.143% 0.1216284%
City Fortuna Humboldt 0.032% 0.0266837%
County Imperial County Imperial 0.258% 0.315% 0.2679006% City Brawley Imperial 0.011% 0.0087986%
City Calexico Imperial 0.019% 0.0152799%
City El Centro Imperial 0.158% 0.1302522%
City Imperial Imperial 0.006% 0.0048791%
County Inyo County Inyo 0.073% 0.089% 0.0754413%
County Kern County Kern 2.517% 3.079% 2.6159145%
City Arvin Kern 0.006% 0.0046425%
City Bakersfield Kern 0.212% 0.1747198%
City California City Kern 0.009% 0.0070820%
City Delano Kern 0.030% 0.0249316%
City McFarland Kern 0.003% 0.0025644%
City Ridgecrest Kern 0.015% 0.0120938%
City Shafter Kern 0.013% 0.0103417%
City Tehachapi Kern 0.009% 0.0073580%
City Wasco Kern 0.008% 0.0069861%
County Kings County Kings 0.293% 0.2413469%
City Avenal Kings 0.007% 0.0056335%
City Corcoran Kings 0.013% 0.0107032%
City Hanford Kings 0.027% 0.0226038%
City Lemoore Kings 0.016% 0.0131900%
County Lake County Lake 0.795% 0.6545389%
City Clearlake Lake 0.041% 0.050% 0.0426253%
City Lakeport Lake 0.021% 0.026% 0.0222964%
County Lassen County Lassen 0.319% 0.391% 0.3320610%
City Susanville Lassen 0.027% 0.0219295%
County Los Angeles County Los Angeles 13.896% 16.999% 14.4437559% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 217 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
4 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Agoura Hills Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040024%
City Alhambra Los Angeles 0.042% 0.0343309%
City Arcadia Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0267718%
City Artesia Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0005100%
City Azusa Los Angeles 0.026% 0.0210857%
City Baldwin Park Los Angeles 0.027% 0.0218520%
City Bell Los Angeles 0.008% 0.0068783%
City Bellflower Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0014485%
City Bell Gardens Los Angeles 0.014% 0.0114301%
City Beverly Hills Los Angeles 0.065% 0.0534897%
City Burbank Los Angeles 0.100% 0.0823132%
City Calabasas Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048948%
City Carson Los Angeles 0.019% 0.0159805%
City Cerritos Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039682%
City Claremont Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0082584%
City Commerce Los Angeles 0.000% 0.0002971%
City Compton Los Angeles 0.044% 0.0361882%
City Covina Los Angeles 0.028% 0.0229127%
City Cudahy Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006020%
City Culver City Los Angeles 0.055% 0.0449894%
City Diamond Bar Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006993%
City Downey Los Angeles 0.052% 0.0429994%
City Duarte Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0027261%
City El Monte Los Angeles 0.031% 0.038% 0.0318985%
City El Segundo Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0268020%
City Gardena Los Angeles 0.034% 0.0278088%
City Glendale Los Angeles 0.166% 0.1366586%
City Glendora Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134411%
City Hawaiian Gardens Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040549%
City Hawthorne Los Angeles 0.050% 0.0407833%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 218 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
5 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Hermosa Beach Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0145307%
City Huntington Park Los Angeles 0.023% 0.0190667%
City Inglewood Los Angeles 0.059% 0.0489195%
City La Cañada Flintridge Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0025565% City Lakewood Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039971%
City La Mirada Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0081572%
City Lancaster Los Angeles 0.045% 0.0369689%
City La Puente Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012999%
City La Verne Los Angeles 0.024% 0.0194190%
City Lawndale Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0017731%
City Lomita Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0031940%
City Long Beach Los Angeles 0.439% 0.3614151%
City Los Angeles Los Angeles 2.715% 3.321% 2.8218811%
City Lynwood Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134345%
City Malibu Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0019269%
City Manhattan Beach Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260686%
City Maywood Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0035528%
City Monrovia Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0254455%
City Montebello Los Angeles 0.030% 0.0250670%
City Monterey Park Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0256677%
City Norwalk Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0258228%
City Palmdale Los Angeles 0.046% 0.0375827%
City Palos Verdes Estates Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0053102% City Paramount Los Angeles 0.011% 0.0091483%
City Pasadena Los Angeles 0.146% 0.1200524%
City Pico Rivera Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0183333%
City Pomona Los Angeles 0.111% 0.0911933%
City Rancho Palos Verdes Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012645%
City Redondo Beach Los Angeles 0.062% 0.0506992%
City Rosemead Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0028260%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 219 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
6 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City San Dimas Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0022016%
City San Fernando Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0104837%
City San Gabriel Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0147726%
City San Marino Los Angeles 0.009% 0.0073791%
City Santa Clarita Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0178167%
City Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0257531%
City Santa Monica Los Angeles 0.158% 0.1298513%
City Sierra Madre Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048646%
City Signal Hill Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0084884%
City South El Monte Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039603%
City South Gate Los Angeles 0.020% 0.0166272%
City South Pasadena Los Angeles 0.012% 0.0095334%
City Temple City Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039498%
City Torrance Los Angeles 0.112% 0.0919820%
City Walnut Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0047305%
City West Covina Los Angeles 0.049% 0.0404521%
City West Hollywood Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0108517%
City Whittier Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260581%
County Madera County Madera 0.349% 0.427% 0.3630669%
City Chowchilla Madera 0.012% 0.0097332%
City Madera Madera 0.039% 0.0318441%
County Marin County Marin 0.564% 0.690% 0.5861325%
City Larkspur Marin 0.015% 0.0124697%
City Mill Valley Marin 0.020% 0.0168401%
City Novato Marin 0.028% 0.0229824%
City San Anselmo Marin 0.009% 0.0078062%
City San Rafael Marin 0.089% 0.0729823%
County Mariposa County Mariposa 0.084% 0.103% 0.0876131% County Mendocino County Mendocino 0.439% 0.536% 0.4558394% City Ukiah Mendocino 0.039% 0.0317153%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 220 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
7 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Merced County Merced 0.551% 0.674% 0.5724262%
City Atwater Merced 0.024% 0.0195846%
City Livingston Merced 0.006% 0.0045873%
City Los Banos Merced 0.020% 0.0165142%
City Merced Merced 0.061% 0.0500762%
County Modoc County Modoc 0.065% 0.080% 0.0678250%
County Mono County Mono 0.023% 0.029% 0.0242606%
County Monterey County Monterey 0.908% 1.111% 0.9437083% City Greenfield Monterey 0.006% 0.0050552%
City King City Monterey 0.005% 0.0037355%
City Marina Monterey 0.017% 0.0144098%
City Monterey Monterey 0.041% 0.0336540%
City Pacific Grove Monterey 0.009% 0.0074842%
City Salinas Monterey 0.094% 0.0776576%
City Seaside Monterey 0.023% 0.0191772%
City Soledad Monterey 0.007% 0.0060870%
County Napa County Napa 0.288% 0.352% 0.2994325%
City American Canyon Napa 0.017% 0.0136869%
City Napa Napa 0.078% 0.0642783%
County Nevada County Nevada 0.441% 0.539% 0.4579827%
City Grass Valley Nevada 0.024% 0.0197805%
City Truckee Nevada 0.003% 0.0023843%
County Orange County Orange 4.364% 5.339% 4.5363576%
City Aliso Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0113841%
City Anaheim Orange 0.554% 0.678% 0.5759282%
City Brea Orange 0.086% 0.0708897%
City Buena Park Orange 0.087% 0.0714352%
City Costa Mesa Orange 0.124% 0.152% 0.1288366%
City Cypress Orange 0.033% 0.0271937%
City Dana Point Orange 0.001% 0.0005560%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 221 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
8 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Fountain Valley Orange 0.055% 0.0455980%
City Fullerton Orange 0.137% 0.168% 0.1425744%
City Garden Grove Orange 0.213% 0.1752482%
City Huntington Beach Orange 0.247% 0.302% 0.2568420%
City Irvine Orange 0.139% 0.170% 0.1442350%
City Laguna Beach Orange 0.047% 0.058% 0.0493043%
City Laguna Hills Orange 0.014% 0.0115457%
City Laguna Niguel Orange 0.001% 0.0007071%
City Laguna Woods Orange 0.001% 0.0006546%
City La Habra Orange 0.060% 0.073% 0.0621049%
City Lake Forest Orange 0.012% 0.0101249%
City La Palma Orange 0.012% 0.0095439%
City Los Alamitos Orange 0.008% 0.0069190%
City Mission Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0117560%
City Newport Beach Orange 0.179% 0.1470134%
City Orange Orange 0.150% 0.1231320%
City Placentia Orange 0.029% 0.035% 0.0298912%
City Rancho Santa Margarita Orange 0.001% 0.0006296%
City San Clemente Orange 0.008% 0.010% 0.0086083%
City San Juan Capistrano Orange 0.008% 0.0065510%
City Santa Ana Orange 0.502% 0.614% 0.5213866%
City Seal Beach Orange 0.020% 0.0165891%
City Stanton Orange 0.035% 0.0291955%
City Tustin Orange 0.073% 0.0600341%
City Westminster Orange 0.104% 0.127% 0.1082721%
City Yorba Linda Orange 0.044% 0.0362223%
County Placer County Placer 1.045% 1.278% 1.0861002%
City Auburn Placer 0.017% 0.0141114%
City Lincoln Placer 0.031% 0.0255599%
City Rocklin Placer 0.076% 0.0625485%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 222 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
9 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Roseville Placer 0.196% 0.1616559%
County Plumas County Plumas 0.205% 0.251% 0.2128729%
County Riverside County Riverside 4.534% 5.547% 4.7128296% City Banning Riverside 0.017% 0.0143848%
City Beaumont Riverside 0.021% 0.0171135%
City Blythe Riverside 0.012% 0.0096714%
City Canyon Lake Riverside 0.000% 0.0001761%
City Cathedral City Riverside 0.067% 0.0553614%
City Coachella Riverside 0.021% 0.0173054%
City Corona Riverside 0.147% 0.1207083%
City Desert Hot Springs Riverside 0.024% 0.0200433%
City Eastvale Riverside 0.000% 0.0002747%
City Hemet Riverside 0.051% 0.0421792%
City Indio Riverside 0.056% 0.0457794%
City Jurupa Valley Riverside 0.001% 0.0008991%
City Lake Elsinore Riverside 0.021% 0.0172949%
City La Quinta Riverside 0.063% 0.0516732%
City Menifee Riverside 0.032% 0.0260909%
City Moreno Valley Riverside 0.137% 0.1130348%
City Murrieta Riverside 0.048% 0.059% 0.0497423%
City Norco Riverside 0.016% 0.0134542%
City Palm Desert Riverside 0.083% 0.0682465%
City Palm Springs Riverside 0.076% 0.0629862%
City Perris Riverside 0.009% 0.0076774%
City Rancho Mirage Riverside 0.052% 0.0431098%
City Riverside Riverside 0.268% 0.2206279%
City San Jacinto Riverside 0.010% 0.0085936%
City Temecula Riverside 0.022% 0.0180086%
City Wildomar Riverside 0.008% 0.0062500%
County Sacramento County Sacramento 3.797% 4.645% 3.9465887% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 223 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
10 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Citrus Heights Sacramento 0.057% 0.0465312%
City Elk Grove Sacramento 0.130% 0.1066994%
City Folsom Sacramento 0.108% 0.0890850%
City Galt Sacramento 0.017% 0.0143704%
City Rancho Cordova Sacramento 0.008% 0.0067679%
City Sacramento Sacramento 0.721% 0.882% 0.7496530%
County San Benito County San Benito 0.106% 0.130% 0.1101417% City Hollister San Benito 0.027% 0.0225355%
County San Bernardino County San Bernardino 3.259% 3.987% 3.3878124% City Adelanto San Bernardino 0.008% 0.0066640%
City Apple Valley San Bernardino 0.025% 0.0207360%
City Barstow San Bernardino 0.015% 0.0122056%
City Chino San Bernardino 0.064% 0.0525893%
City Chino Hills San Bernardino 0.001% 0.0006388%
City Colton San Bernardino 0.031% 0.0253443%
City Fontana San Bernardino 0.112% 0.0920543%
City Grand Terrace San Bernardino 0.006% 0.0051051%
City Hesperia San Bernardino 0.035% 0.0291522%
City Highland San Bernardino 0.004% 0.0029061%
City Loma Linda San Bernardino 0.009% 0.0071188%
City Montclair San Bernardino 0.039% 0.0322108%
City Ontario San Bernardino 0.179% 0.1472934%
City Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino 0.084% 0.0689431%
City Redlands San Bernardino 0.057% 0.0469150%
City Rialto San Bernardino 0.073% 0.0603206%
City San Bernardino San Bernardino 0.178% 0.1461880%
City Twentynine Palms San Bernardino 0.002% 0.0012605%
City Upland San Bernardino 0.052% 0.0424460%
City Victorville San Bernardino 0.033% 0.0269400%
City Yucaipa San Bernardino 0.016% 0.0128772%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 224 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
11 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Yucca Valley San Bernardino 0.003% 0.0021228%
County San Diego County San Diego 5.706% 6.980% 5.9309748% City Carlsbad San Diego 0.128% 0.1050485%
City Chula Vista San Diego 0.189% 0.231% 0.1961456%
City Coronado San Diego 0.044% 0.0359095%
City El Cajon San Diego 0.113% 0.0933582%
City Encinitas San Diego 0.061% 0.074% 0.0630289%
City Escondido San Diego 0.145% 0.1192204%
City Imperial Beach San Diego 0.014% 0.0118283%
City La Mesa San Diego 0.055% 0.068% 0.0575593%
City Lemon Grove San Diego 0.022% 0.0183911%
City National City San Diego 0.080% 0.0656808%
City Oceanside San Diego 0.213% 0.1753428%
City Poway San Diego 0.062% 0.0511040%
City San Diego San Diego 1.975% 2.416% 2.0531169%
City San Marcos San Diego 0.089% 0.0733897%
City Santee San Diego 0.033% 0.0268401%
City Solana Beach San Diego 0.017% 0.0138564%
City Vista San Diego 0.052% 0.0425144%
Consolidated San Francisco San Francisco 3.026% 3.702% 3.1457169% County San Joaquin County San Joaquin 1.680% 2.055% 1.7460399% City Lathrop San Joaquin 0.009% 0.0075394%
City Lodi San Joaquin 0.053% 0.0439484%
City Manteca San Joaquin 0.054% 0.0443454%
City Ripon San Joaquin 0.013% 0.0104219%
City Stockton San Joaquin 0.313% 0.383% 0.3256176%
City Tracy San Joaquin 0.084% 0.0692047%
County San Luis Obispo County San Luis Obispo 0.816% 0.999% 0.8484126% City Arroyo Grande San Luis Obispo 0.024% 0.0199053%
City Atascadero San Luis Obispo 0.029% 0.0240680%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 225 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
12 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles) San Luis Obispo 0.043% 0.0353456% City Grover Beach San Luis Obispo 0.017% 0.0137881%
City Morro Bay San Luis Obispo 0.020% 0.0160922%
City San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo 0.077% 0.0637841%
County San Mateo County San Mateo 1.074% 1.313% 1.1159599% City Belmont San Mateo 0.021% 0.0169860%
City Burlingame San Mateo 0.019% 0.0152537%
City Daly City San Mateo 0.044% 0.0363880%
City East Palo Alto San Mateo 0.013% 0.0103982%
City Foster City San Mateo 0.020% 0.0166101%
City Half Moon Bay San Mateo 0.004% 0.0031638%
City Hillsborough San Mateo 0.013% 0.0110029%
City Menlo Park San Mateo 0.015% 0.0126209%
City Millbrae San Mateo 0.013% 0.0105836%
City Pacifica San Mateo 0.016% 0.0130625%
City Redwood City San Mateo 0.056% 0.0463511%
City San Bruno San Mateo 0.021% 0.0172161%
City San Carlos San Mateo 0.013% 0.0108885%
City San Mateo San Mateo 0.052% 0.0425841%
City South San Francisco San Mateo 0.043% 0.0353943%
County Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara 1.132% 1.385% 1.1768968% City Carpinteria Santa Barbara 0.001% 0.0008938%
City Goleta Santa Barbara 0.004% 0.0028969%
City Lompoc Santa Barbara 0.047% 0.0389379%
City Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 0.122% 0.1004559%
City Santa Maria Santa Barbara 0.058% 0.0479179%
County Santa Clara County Santa Clara 2.404% 2.941% 2.4987553% City Campbell Santa Clara 0.014% 0.0112566%
City Cupertino Santa Clara 0.008% 0.0066824%
City Gilroy Santa Clara 0.025% 0.0202891%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 226 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
13 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Los Altos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103338%
City Los Gatos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103220%
City Milpitas Santa Clara 0.036% 0.0298120%
City Morgan Hill Santa Clara 0.015% 0.0124619%
City Mountain View Santa Clara 0.041% 0.0334608%
City Palo Alto Santa Clara 0.039% 0.0323080%
City San Jose Santa Clara 0.294% 0.360% 0.3054960%
City Santa Clara Santa Clara 0.067% 0.0549723%
City Saratoga Santa Clara 0.004% 0.0034161%
City Sunnyvale Santa Clara 0.053% 0.0434069%
County Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz 0.783% 0.957% 0.8135396% City Capitola Santa Cruz 0.020% 0.0168191%
City Santa Cruz Santa Cruz 0.143% 0.1180348%
City Scotts Valley Santa Cruz 0.015% 0.0126525%
City Watsonville Santa Cruz 0.063% 0.0520136%
County Shasta County Shasta 1.095% 1.339% 1.1380191%
City Anderson Shasta 0.024% 0.0198896%
City Redding Shasta 0.284% 0.2334841%
City Shasta Lake Shasta 0.004% 0.0031993%
County Siskiyou County Siskiyou 0.228% 0.279% 0.2373393% County Solano County Solano 0.760% 0.6260795%
City Benicia Solano 0.031% 0.0253903%
City Dixon Solano 0.016% 0.0130849%
City Fairfield Solano 0.109% 0.0897317%
City Suisun City Solano 0.021% 0.0176183%
City Vacaville Solano 0.119% 0.0976497%
City Vallejo Solano 0.167% 0.1373644%
County Sonoma County Sonoma 1.218% 1.490% 1.2661290%
City Healdsburg Sonoma 0.032% 0.0266929%
City Petaluma Sonoma 0.081% 0.0667507%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 227 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
14 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Rohnert Park Sonoma 0.041% 0.0340759%
City Santa Rosa Sonoma 0.184% 0.1519070%
City Sonoma Sonoma 0.022% 0.0183438%
City Windsor Sonoma 0.016% 0.0129298%
County Stanislaus County Stanislaus 1.722% 1.4182273%
City Ceres Stanislaus 0.041% 0.0340260%
City Modesto Stanislaus 0.217% 0.1788759%
City Newman Stanislaus 0.006% 0.0046964%
City Oakdale Stanislaus 0.018% 0.0145531%
City Patterson Stanislaus 0.015% 0.0126590%
City Riverbank Stanislaus 0.010% 0.0085699%
City Turlock Stanislaus 0.065% 0.0531966%
County Sutter County Sutter 0.306% 0.374% 0.3179548%
City Yuba City Sutter 0.074% 0.0606242%
County Tehama County Tehama 0.213% 0.261% 0.2216654%
City Red Bluff Tehama 0.014% 0.0117771%
County Trinity County Trinity 0.082% 0.101% 0.0855476%
County Tulare County Tulare 0.809% 0.990% 0.8410949%
City Dinuba Tulare 0.014% 0.0116929%
City Exeter Tulare 0.004% 0.0032479%
City Farmersville Tulare 0.003% 0.0027879%
City Lindsay Tulare 0.007% 0.0057111%
City Porterville Tulare 0.021% 0.0171845%
City Tulare Tulare 0.037% 0.0302273%
City Visalia Tulare 0.066% 0.0545872%
County Tuolumne County Tuolumne 0.486% 0.594% 0.5047621% County Ventura County Ventura 2.192% 2.681% 2.2781201%
City Camarillo Ventura 0.002% 0.0012815%
City Fillmore Ventura 0.002% 0.0020294%
City Moorpark Ventura 0.008% 0.0067337%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 228 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
15 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Oxnard Ventura 0.156% 0.190% 0.1617338%
City Port Hueneme Ventura 0.021% 0.0174145%
City San Buenaventura (Ventura) Ventura 0.085% 0.0702181% City Santa Paula Ventura 0.014% 0.0119072%
City Simi Valley Ventura 0.065% 0.0533043%
City Thousand Oaks Ventura 0.022% 0.0179902%
County Yolo County Yolo 0.357% 0.437% 0.3713319%
City Davis Yolo 0.055% 0.0451747%
City West Sacramento Yolo 0.066% 0.0544321%
City Woodland Yolo 0.058% 0.0477904%
County Yuba County Yuba 0.214% 0.262% 0.2225679%
City Marysville Yuba 0.014% 0.0112079%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 229 April 11, 2023
1 6
APPENDIX 2
Cost Reimbursement Procedure

Costs does not include attorneys’ fees, costs, or expenses incurred by private contingency fee counsel. No part of the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be used to reimburse Costs.
b) First Claims Date means October 1, 2023 or when all applications for reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in part, from funds available under Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, Section XIV and Exhibit R of the Teva Settlement Agreement, Section XIII and Exhibit R of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement, Section XI and Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the CVS Settlement Agreement, or Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, have been finally determined under the provisions of those agreements, whichever comes first.
c) Special Master means a retired judicial officer or former public lawyer, not presently employed or retained by a Plaintiff Subdivision, who will aggregate, review, and determine the reasonable Costs to be awarded to each Plaintiff Subdivision that submits a claim for reimbursement of Costs. The Special Master will be selected by a majority vote of the votes cast by Plaintiff Subdivisions, with each such subdivision having one vote. d) Plaintiff Subdivision Committee means the committee of Plaintiff Subdivisions that will review and approve the invoices submitted by the Special Master reflecting his or her reasonable time and expenses.

2. Cost Reimbursement to Plaintiff Subdivision
a) Purpose. Substantial resources have been expended to hold Opioid Defendants accountable for creating and profiting from the opioid crisis, and this effort has been a significant catalyst in creating National Opioid Settlements with various manufacturers, distributors, and chain pharmacies.
b) Claims Procedure.
i. If a Plaintiff Subdivision is eligible to seek reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in part, from funds available under Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walgreens DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 230 April 11, 2023
1 7
Settlement Agreement, Section XIV and Exhibit R of the Teva Settlement Agreement, Section XIII and Exhibit R of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the CVS Settlement Agreement, Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, Section X or Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement, or Section XI or Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, it must first make a timely application for reimbursement from such funds. To allow sufficient time for determination of those applications, no claim for Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund under this Agreement may be made before the First Claims Date.
ii. A Plaintiff Subdivision that wishes to be reimbursed from the CA Subdivision Fund must submit a claim to the Special Master no later than forty-five (45) days after the First Claims Date. The Special Master will then compile and redistribute the aggregated claim totals for each Plaintiff Subdivision via email to representatives of all the Plaintiff Subdivisions. A claim for attorney and staff time must list, for each attorney or staff member included in the claim, the following information: name, title, total hours claimed, hourly rate (including, if sought, benefits and share of overhead), and narrative summarizing the general nature of the work performed by the attorney or staff member. For reimbursement of “hard” costs, the subdivision may aggregate across a category (e.g., total for travel costs). It is the intention of the Plaintiff Subdivisions that submission of documents related to reimbursement of Costs does not waive any attorney-client privilege or exemptions to the California Public Records Act.
iii. The Special Master may request, at his or her sole option, additional documents or details to assist in the final award of Costs.
iv. The Special Master will review claims for reasonableness and will notify each Plaintiff Subdivision of the final determination of its claim, and will provide a list of all final awards to all Plaintiff Subdivisions by email or, upon request, via First Class U.S. Mail. Any Plaintiff Subdivision may ask the Special Master to reconsider any final award within twenty-one (21) days. The Special Master will make a final determination on any such reconsideration request within thirty (30) days of receipt.
v. Any decision of the Special Master is final and binding, and will be considered under the California Arbitration Act, Code of Civil Procedure section 1280 et seq. as a final arbitration award. Nothing in this agreement is intended to expand the scope of judicial review of the final award for errors of fact or law, and the Parties agree that they may only seek to vacate the award if clear and convincing evidence demonstrates one of the factors set forth in Code of Civil Procedure, section 1286.2, subdivision (a). Plaintiff Subdivisions will have fourteen (14) days after all final awards are made, together with any final determination of a request for DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 231 April 11, 2023
1 8
reconsideration, to seek review in the Superior Court of California, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285, where the State has filed its Consent Judgment. vi. The Special Master will prepare a report of Costs that includes his or her fees and expenses at least ninety (90) days before the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Special Master’s preparation of a report of Costs does not discharge a Plaintiff Subdivision’s reporting requirement under Section V(B)(2) of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement.
vii. A member of the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee, which is a CA Participating Subdivision, will submit to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Walgreens a report of the fees and expenses incurred by the Special Master pursuant to Section V(B)(2) of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement.
c) Claims Priority and Limitation.
i. The Special Master will submit invoices for compensation of reasonable fees and expenses to the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee no later than ninety (90) days prior to the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Plaintiff Subdivision Committee will promptly review and, if reasonable, approve the Special Master’s invoice for compensation. The Plaintiff Subdivision Committee will submit approved invoices to the Settlement Fund Administrator for payment. The Special Master’s approved invoices have priority and will be paid first from the CA Subdivision Fund before any award of Costs, subject to the limitation in Section

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 232 April 11, 2023
1 9
d) Collateral Source Payments and Third-Party Settlement. i. In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision is awarded compensation, in whole or in part, by any source of funds created as a result of litigation against an Opioid Defendant for its reasonable Costs, it will reduce its claim for Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund by that amount. If a Plaintiff Subdivision has already received a final award of Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund, it will repay the fund up to the prior award of Costs via a payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator or notify the Settlement Fund Administrator that its allocation from the next and subsequent Annual Payments should be reduced accordingly. If the Plaintiff Subdivision is repaying any prior award of Costs, that repayment will occur as soon as is feasible after the Plaintiff Subdivision’s receipt of Cost funds from the collateral source, but no more than 90 days after its receipt from the collateral source. The Settlement Fund Administrator will add any repaid Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund. Any Plaintiff Subdivision that has submitted for reimbursement to any national fund and has not received a final determination by the First Claims Date may request that the settlement administrator withhold some or all of its payment from the CA Subdivision Fund in order to avoid repayment.
ii. In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision reaches a monetary settlement or compromise against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement, the monetary portion of such settlement, net of fees paid to outside contingency fee counsel and of funds earmarked strictly for abatement, will be credited against its Costs and the subdivision will be ineligible to recover those credited Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund. Plaintiff Subdivisions negotiating monetary settlements or compromises against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement will negotiate for funds to repay any Costs it previously received from the CA Subdivision Fund or for Costs it otherwise might be eligible to claim from the CA Subdivision Fund. If such a settlement is paid after all final approved claims for Costs by all Plaintiff Subdivisions are satisfied in full, the settling subdivision will reimburse the CA Subdivision Fund in that amount by making payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator to add to the CA Subdivision Fund in a manner consistent with the repayments described in section 2.d.i above.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 233 April 11, 2023
1 APPENDIX 3

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement and CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Walgreens Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL], together with any contingency fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the national Attorney Fee Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the total gross recovery of [SUBDIVISION] from the Walgreens Settlement.
[COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created under the Walgreens Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of “State BackStop Agreement” in Exhibit R of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between “a Settling State” and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
[DATE] [SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 234 April 11, 2023
1 Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds – Walmart Settlement

1. Introduction
Pursuant to the Walmart Settlement Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2022, and any revision thereto (the “Walmart Settlement Agreement”), including Section V and Exhibit O, the State of California proposes this agreement (the “CA Walmart Allocation Agreement”) to govern the allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to Sections IV and V of the Walmart Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Sections VIII or IX of the Walmart Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be a Participating Subdivision.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 235 April 11, 2023
2 i) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020. j) Opioid Defendant means any defendant (including but not limited to Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, and McKesson Corporation) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.

3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, as well as applicable law, and the Walmart Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement have the same meaning as in the Walmart Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.

Pursuant to Section V(D)(1) of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section V(B)(2) of the Walmart Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.

4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California,1 pursuant to the Walmart Settlement Agreement, shall be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement, and 15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the “State of California Allocation”), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund (“CA Abatement Accounts Fund”), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund (“CA Subdivision Fund”). 1 For purposes of clarity, use of the term “California” refers to the geographic territory of California and the state and its local governments therein. The term “State” or “State of California” refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 236 April 11, 2023
3 A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by the State for future Opioid Remediation.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 237 April 11, 2023
4 e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Walmart Settlement Agreement and this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must be transferred to the State. This provision shall not apply to the Cost Reimbursement Funds, which shall be controlled by Appendix 2.
ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to the Walmart Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program; (2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) treatment infrastructure; (3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non-sworn) and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability, restorative justice, and harm reduction; and/or (5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth. c) The California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”) may add to this list (but not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list.
d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Walmart Settlement Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 238 April 11, 2023
5 Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for Opioid Remediation consistent with the Walmart Settlement Agreement and this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Walmart Settlement Agreement and this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision’s use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Walmart Settlement Agreement or this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern.
c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the Subdivision’s use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise enforce the requirements of the Walmart Settlement Agreement or this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this agreement.
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits, investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal enforcement actions.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 239 April 11, 2023
6 C. CA Subdivision Fund
i. Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used, subject to any limits imposed by the Walmart Settlement Agreement and this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioidrelated expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation, and to pay the reasonable fees and expenses of the Special Master as set forth in Appendix 2.

The CA Subdivision Funds will be allocated as follows:
a) First, funds in the CA Subdivision Fund shall be used to pay the Special Master’s reasonable fees and expenses in accordance with the procedures and limitations set forth in Appendix 2 to this document;
b) Second, funds will be allocated to Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Participating Subdivisions that have been awarded Costs, as defined by and in accordance with the procedures and limitations set forth in Appendix 2 to this document. c) Funds remaining in the CA Subdivision Fund, which shall consist of no less than 50% of the total CA Subdivision Fund received in any year pursuant to Appendix 2, Section 2.c.v, will be distributed to Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Participating Subdivisions, in relative proportion to the Local Allocation. These funds shall be used to fund future opioid-related projects and to reimburse past opioid-related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation against any Opioid Defendant.

D. Provision for State Back-Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) (“MDL Fees Order”) in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) “cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee agreements at 15%.” Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the Walmart Settlement Agreement, and, if applicable, the Allergan Settlement Agreement, CVS Settlement Agreement, Distributor Settlement Agreement, Janssen Settlement Agreement, Teva Settlement Agreement, and Walgreens Settlement Agreement.

Before seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back-Stop Agreement, private DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 240 April 11, 2023
7 counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Walmart Settlement Agreement. Further, private counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State’s use of funds from the settlement until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the settlement will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the settlement have been used in compliance with the Walmart Settlement Agreement and this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions’ expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision. d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and expenditures, as required by the Walmart Settlement Agreement and this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used, including if used to pay attorneys’ fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to Section V(B)(2) of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, such information must also be reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Walmart.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 241 April 11, 2023
8 e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the State and Participating Subdivisions.

6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Walmart Settlement Agreement, this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Walmart Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d) Except as provided in the Walmart Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 242 April 11, 2023
9 The undersigned, California City city, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Walmart Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Walmart Settlement and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Walmart Settlement. EXECUTED on /date_1_walmart/.

Signature: /signer_1_teva_allergan/
Name: /name_1_teva_allergan/
Title: /title_1_teva_allergan/
Date: /date_1_walmart/
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 Inge Elmes
City Manager
April 11, 2023
243 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds—Walmart Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change. Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 244 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
1 of 15
100.000% 100.000% 100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Alameda County Alameda 2.332% 2.853% 2.4237952%
City Alameda Alameda 0.069% 0.0570162%
City Albany Alameda 0.013% 0.0107768%
City Berkeley Alameda 0.152% 0.1249656%
City Dublin Alameda 0.033% 0.040% 0.0338810%
City Emeryville Alameda 0.023% 0.0185765%
City Fremont Alameda 0.108% 0.0888576%
City Hayward Alameda 0.117% 0.0966218%
City Livermore Alameda 0.054% 0.0446740%
City Newark Alameda 0.026% 0.0217626%
City Oakland Alameda 0.486% 0.595% 0.5055601%
City Piedmont Alameda 0.014% 0.0114064%
City Pleasanton Alameda 0.067% 0.0554547%
City San Leandro Alameda 0.039% 0.0321267%
City Union City Alameda 0.043% 0.0352484%
County Amador County Amador 0.226% 0.277% 0.2349885%
County Butte County Butte 1.615% 1.975% 1.6783178%
City Chico Butte 0.216% 0.264% 0.2246499%
City Oroville Butte 0.079% 0.0646595%
County Calaveras County Calaveras 0.226% 0.277% 0.2351644% County Colusa County Colusa 0.059% 0.0489221%
County Contra Costa County Contra Costa 2.102% 2.571% 2.1844585% City Antioch Contra Costa 0.037% 0.0301879%
City Brentwood Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0215339%
City Clayton Contra Costa 0.002% 0.0018060%
City Concord Contra Costa 0.055% 0.0456676%
City Danville Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0082255%
City El Cerrito Contra Costa 0.023% 0.0189024%
City Hercules Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0078273%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 245 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
2 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Lafayette Contra Costa 0.006% 0.0046030%
City Martinez Contra Costa 0.012% 0.0098593%
City Moraga Contra Costa 0.004% 0.0031007%
City Oakley Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0079416%
City Orinda Contra Costa 0.005% 0.0038157%
City Pinole Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0110909%
City Pittsburg Contra Costa 0.053% 0.0436369%
City Pleasant Hill Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0106309%
City Richmond Contra Costa 0.146% 0.1201444%
City San Pablo Contra Costa 0.018% 0.0148843%
City San Ramon Contra Costa 0.021% 0.0176459%
City Walnut Creek Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0212132%
County Del Norte County Del Norte 0.114% 0.140% 0.1189608% County El Dorado County El Dorado 0.768% 0.939% 0.7980034% City Placerville El Dorado 0.015% 0.0127642%
City South Lake Tahoe El Dorado 0.081% 0.0665456%
County Fresno County Fresno 1.895% 2.318% 1.9693410%
City Clovis Fresno 0.065% 0.0536211%
City Coalinga Fresno 0.012% 0.0098554%
City Fresno Fresno 0.397% 0.3270605%
City Kerman Fresno 0.005% 0.0042534%
City Kingsburg Fresno 0.008% 0.0066167%
City Mendota Fresno 0.002% 0.0019387%
City Orange Cove Fresno 0.004% 0.0035607%
City Parlier Fresno 0.008% 0.0069755%
City Reedley Fresno 0.012% 0.0098804%
City Sanger Fresno 0.018% 0.0146135%
City Selma Fresno 0.015% 0.0127537%
County Glenn County Glenn 0.107% 0.131% 0.1116978%
County Humboldt County Humboldt 1.030% 1.260% 1.0703185% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 246 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
3 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Arcata Humboldt 0.054% 0.0447660%
City Eureka Humboldt 0.117% 0.143% 0.1216284%
City Fortuna Humboldt 0.032% 0.0266837%
County Imperial County Imperial 0.258% 0.315% 0.2679006% City Brawley Imperial 0.011% 0.0087986%
City Calexico Imperial 0.019% 0.0152799%
City El Centro Imperial 0.158% 0.1302522%
City Imperial Imperial 0.006% 0.0048791%
County Inyo County Inyo 0.073% 0.089% 0.0754413%
County Kern County Kern 2.517% 3.079% 2.6159145%
City Arvin Kern 0.006% 0.0046425%
City Bakersfield Kern 0.212% 0.1747198%
City California City Kern 0.009% 0.0070820%
City Delano Kern 0.030% 0.0249316%
City McFarland Kern 0.003% 0.0025644%
City Ridgecrest Kern 0.015% 0.0120938%
City Shafter Kern 0.013% 0.0103417%
City Tehachapi Kern 0.009% 0.0073580%
City Wasco Kern 0.008% 0.0069861%
County Kings County Kings 0.293% 0.2413469%
City Avenal Kings 0.007% 0.0056335%
City Corcoran Kings 0.013% 0.0107032%
City Hanford Kings 0.027% 0.0226038%
City Lemoore Kings 0.016% 0.0131900%
County Lake County Lake 0.795% 0.6545389%
City Clearlake Lake 0.041% 0.050% 0.0426253%
City Lakeport Lake 0.021% 0.026% 0.0222964%
County Lassen County Lassen 0.319% 0.391% 0.3320610%
City Susanville Lassen 0.027% 0.0219295%
County Los Angeles County Los Angeles 13.896% 16.999% 14.4437559% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 247 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
4 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Agoura Hills Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040024%
City Alhambra Los Angeles 0.042% 0.0343309%
City Arcadia Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0267718%
City Artesia Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0005100%
City Azusa Los Angeles 0.026% 0.0210857%
City Baldwin Park Los Angeles 0.027% 0.0218520%
City Bell Los Angeles 0.008% 0.0068783%
City Bellflower Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0014485%
City Bell Gardens Los Angeles 0.014% 0.0114301%
City Beverly Hills Los Angeles 0.065% 0.0534897%
City Burbank Los Angeles 0.100% 0.0823132%
City Calabasas Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048948%
City Carson Los Angeles 0.019% 0.0159805%
City Cerritos Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039682%
City Claremont Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0082584%
City Commerce Los Angeles 0.000% 0.0002971%
City Compton Los Angeles 0.044% 0.0361882%
City Covina Los Angeles 0.028% 0.0229127%
City Cudahy Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006020%
City Culver City Los Angeles 0.055% 0.0449894%
City Diamond Bar Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006993%
City Downey Los Angeles 0.052% 0.0429994%
City Duarte Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0027261%
City El Monte Los Angeles 0.031% 0.038% 0.0318985%
City El Segundo Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0268020%
City Gardena Los Angeles 0.034% 0.0278088%
City Glendale Los Angeles 0.166% 0.1366586%
City Glendora Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134411%
City Hawaiian Gardens Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040549%
City Hawthorne Los Angeles 0.050% 0.0407833%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 248 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
5 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Hermosa Beach Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0145307%
City Huntington Park Los Angeles 0.023% 0.0190667%
City Inglewood Los Angeles 0.059% 0.0489195%
City La Cañada Flintridge Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0025565% City Lakewood Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039971%
City La Mirada Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0081572%
City Lancaster Los Angeles 0.045% 0.0369689%
City La Puente Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012999%
City La Verne Los Angeles 0.024% 0.0194190%
City Lawndale Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0017731%
City Lomita Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0031940%
City Long Beach Los Angeles 0.439% 0.3614151%
City Los Angeles Los Angeles 2.715% 3.321% 2.8218811%
City Lynwood Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134345%
City Malibu Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0019269%
City Manhattan Beach Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260686%
City Maywood Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0035528%
City Monrovia Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0254455%
City Montebello Los Angeles 0.030% 0.0250670%
City Monterey Park Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0256677%
City Norwalk Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0258228%
City Palmdale Los Angeles 0.046% 0.0375827%
City Palos Verdes Estates Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0053102% City Paramount Los Angeles 0.011% 0.0091483%
City Pasadena Los Angeles 0.146% 0.1200524%
City Pico Rivera Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0183333%
City Pomona Los Angeles 0.111% 0.0911933%
City Rancho Palos Verdes Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012645%
City Redondo Beach Los Angeles 0.062% 0.0506992%
City Rosemead Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0028260%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 249 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
6 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City San Dimas Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0022016%
City San Fernando Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0104837%
City San Gabriel Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0147726%
City San Marino Los Angeles 0.009% 0.0073791%
City Santa Clarita Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0178167%
City Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0257531%
City Santa Monica Los Angeles 0.158% 0.1298513%
City Sierra Madre Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048646%
City Signal Hill Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0084884%
City South El Monte Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039603%
City South Gate Los Angeles 0.020% 0.0166272%
City South Pasadena Los Angeles 0.012% 0.0095334%
City Temple City Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039498%
City Torrance Los Angeles 0.112% 0.0919820%
City Walnut Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0047305%
City West Covina Los Angeles 0.049% 0.0404521%
City West Hollywood Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0108517%
City Whittier Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260581%
County Madera County Madera 0.349% 0.427% 0.3630669%
City Chowchilla Madera 0.012% 0.0097332%
City Madera Madera 0.039% 0.0318441%
County Marin County Marin 0.564% 0.690% 0.5861325%
City Larkspur Marin 0.015% 0.0124697%
City Mill Valley Marin 0.020% 0.0168401%
City Novato Marin 0.028% 0.0229824%
City San Anselmo Marin 0.009% 0.0078062%
City San Rafael Marin 0.089% 0.0729823%
County Mariposa County Mariposa 0.084% 0.103% 0.0876131% County Mendocino County Mendocino 0.439% 0.536% 0.4558394% City Ukiah Mendocino 0.039% 0.0317153%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 250 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
7 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Merced County Merced 0.551% 0.674% 0.5724262%
City Atwater Merced 0.024% 0.0195846%
City Livingston Merced 0.006% 0.0045873%
City Los Banos Merced 0.020% 0.0165142%
City Merced Merced 0.061% 0.0500762%
County Modoc County Modoc 0.065% 0.080% 0.0678250%
County Mono County Mono 0.023% 0.029% 0.0242606%
County Monterey County Monterey 0.908% 1.111% 0.9437083% City Greenfield Monterey 0.006% 0.0050552%
City King City Monterey 0.005% 0.0037355%
City Marina Monterey 0.017% 0.0144098%
City Monterey Monterey 0.041% 0.0336540%
City Pacific Grove Monterey 0.009% 0.0074842%
City Salinas Monterey 0.094% 0.0776576%
City Seaside Monterey 0.023% 0.0191772%
City Soledad Monterey 0.007% 0.0060870%
County Napa County Napa 0.288% 0.352% 0.2994325%
City American Canyon Napa 0.017% 0.0136869%
City Napa Napa 0.078% 0.0642783%
County Nevada County Nevada 0.441% 0.539% 0.4579827%
City Grass Valley Nevada 0.024% 0.0197805%
City Truckee Nevada 0.003% 0.0023843%
County Orange County Orange 4.364% 5.339% 4.5363576%
City Aliso Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0113841%
City Anaheim Orange 0.554% 0.678% 0.5759282%
City Brea Orange 0.086% 0.0708897%
City Buena Park Orange 0.087% 0.0714352%
City Costa Mesa Orange 0.124% 0.152% 0.1288366%
City Cypress Orange 0.033% 0.0271937%
City Dana Point Orange 0.001% 0.0005560%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 251 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
8 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Fountain Valley Orange 0.055% 0.0455980%
City Fullerton Orange 0.137% 0.168% 0.1425744%
City Garden Grove Orange 0.213% 0.1752482%
City Huntington Beach Orange 0.247% 0.302% 0.2568420%
City Irvine Orange 0.139% 0.170% 0.1442350%
City Laguna Beach Orange 0.047% 0.058% 0.0493043%
City Laguna Hills Orange 0.014% 0.0115457%
City Laguna Niguel Orange 0.001% 0.0007071%
City Laguna Woods Orange 0.001% 0.0006546%
City La Habra Orange 0.060% 0.073% 0.0621049%
City Lake Forest Orange 0.012% 0.0101249%
City La Palma Orange 0.012% 0.0095439%
City Los Alamitos Orange 0.008% 0.0069190%
City Mission Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0117560%
City Newport Beach Orange 0.179% 0.1470134%
City Orange Orange 0.150% 0.1231320%
City Placentia Orange 0.029% 0.035% 0.0298912%
City Rancho Santa Margarita Orange 0.001% 0.0006296%
City San Clemente Orange 0.008% 0.010% 0.0086083%
City San Juan Capistrano Orange 0.008% 0.0065510%
City Santa Ana Orange 0.502% 0.614% 0.5213866%
City Seal Beach Orange 0.020% 0.0165891%
City Stanton Orange 0.035% 0.0291955%
City Tustin Orange 0.073% 0.0600341%
City Westminster Orange 0.104% 0.127% 0.1082721%
City Yorba Linda Orange 0.044% 0.0362223%
County Placer County Placer 1.045% 1.278% 1.0861002%
City Auburn Placer 0.017% 0.0141114%
City Lincoln Placer 0.031% 0.0255599%
City Rocklin Placer 0.076% 0.0625485%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 252 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
9 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Roseville Placer 0.196% 0.1616559%
County Plumas County Plumas 0.205% 0.251% 0.2128729%
County Riverside County Riverside 4.534% 5.547% 4.7128296% City Banning Riverside 0.017% 0.0143848%
City Beaumont Riverside 0.021% 0.0171135%
City Blythe Riverside 0.012% 0.0096714%
City Canyon Lake Riverside 0.000% 0.0001761%
City Cathedral City Riverside 0.067% 0.0553614%
City Coachella Riverside 0.021% 0.0173054%
City Corona Riverside 0.147% 0.1207083%
City Desert Hot Springs Riverside 0.024% 0.0200433%
City Eastvale Riverside 0.000% 0.0002747%
City Hemet Riverside 0.051% 0.0421792%
City Indio Riverside 0.056% 0.0457794%
City Jurupa Valley Riverside 0.001% 0.0008991%
City Lake Elsinore Riverside 0.021% 0.0172949%
City La Quinta Riverside 0.063% 0.0516732%
City Menifee Riverside 0.032% 0.0260909%
City Moreno Valley Riverside 0.137% 0.1130348%
City Murrieta Riverside 0.048% 0.059% 0.0497423%
City Norco Riverside 0.016% 0.0134542%
City Palm Desert Riverside 0.083% 0.0682465%
City Palm Springs Riverside 0.076% 0.0629862%
City Perris Riverside 0.009% 0.0076774%
City Rancho Mirage Riverside 0.052% 0.0431098%
City Riverside Riverside 0.268% 0.2206279%
City San Jacinto Riverside 0.010% 0.0085936%
City Temecula Riverside 0.022% 0.0180086%
City Wildomar Riverside 0.008% 0.0062500%
County Sacramento County Sacramento 3.797% 4.645% 3.9465887% DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 253 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
10 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Citrus Heights Sacramento 0.057% 0.0465312%
City Elk Grove Sacramento 0.130% 0.1066994%
City Folsom Sacramento 0.108% 0.0890850%
City Galt Sacramento 0.017% 0.0143704%
City Rancho Cordova Sacramento 0.008% 0.0067679%
City Sacramento Sacramento 0.721% 0.882% 0.7496530%
County San Benito County San Benito 0.106% 0.130% 0.1101417% City Hollister San Benito 0.027% 0.0225355%
County San Bernardino County San Bernardino 3.259% 3.987% 3.3878124% City Adelanto San Bernardino 0.008% 0.0066640%
City Apple Valley San Bernardino 0.025% 0.0207360%
City Barstow San Bernardino 0.015% 0.0122056%
City Chino San Bernardino 0.064% 0.0525893%
City Chino Hills San Bernardino 0.001% 0.0006388%
City Colton San Bernardino 0.031% 0.0253443%
City Fontana San Bernardino 0.112% 0.0920543%
City Grand Terrace San Bernardino 0.006% 0.0051051%
City Hesperia San Bernardino 0.035% 0.0291522%
City Highland San Bernardino 0.004% 0.0029061%
City Loma Linda San Bernardino 0.009% 0.0071188%
City Montclair San Bernardino 0.039% 0.0322108%
City Ontario San Bernardino 0.179% 0.1472934%
City Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino 0.084% 0.0689431%
City Redlands San Bernardino 0.057% 0.0469150%
City Rialto San Bernardino 0.073% 0.0603206%
City San Bernardino San Bernardino 0.178% 0.1461880%
City Twentynine Palms San Bernardino 0.002% 0.0012605%
City Upland San Bernardino 0.052% 0.0424460%
City Victorville San Bernardino 0.033% 0.0269400%
City Yucaipa San Bernardino 0.016% 0.0128772%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 254 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
11 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Yucca Valley San Bernardino 0.003% 0.0021228%
County San Diego County San Diego 5.706% 6.980% 5.9309748% City Carlsbad San Diego 0.128% 0.1050485%
City Chula Vista San Diego 0.189% 0.231% 0.1961456%
City Coronado San Diego 0.044% 0.0359095%
City El Cajon San Diego 0.113% 0.0933582%
City Encinitas San Diego 0.061% 0.074% 0.0630289%
City Escondido San Diego 0.145% 0.1192204%
City Imperial Beach San Diego 0.014% 0.0118283%
City La Mesa San Diego 0.055% 0.068% 0.0575593%
City Lemon Grove San Diego 0.022% 0.0183911%
City National City San Diego 0.080% 0.0656808%
City Oceanside San Diego 0.213% 0.1753428%
City Poway San Diego 0.062% 0.0511040%
City San Diego San Diego 1.975% 2.416% 2.0531169%
City San Marcos San Diego 0.089% 0.0733897%
City Santee San Diego 0.033% 0.0268401%
City Solana Beach San Diego 0.017% 0.0138564%
City Vista San Diego 0.052% 0.0425144%
Consolidated San Francisco San Francisco 3.026% 3.702% 3.1457169% County San Joaquin County San Joaquin 1.680% 2.055% 1.7460399% City Lathrop San Joaquin 0.009% 0.0075394%
City Lodi San Joaquin 0.053% 0.0439484%
City Manteca San Joaquin 0.054% 0.0443454%
City Ripon San Joaquin 0.013% 0.0104219%
City Stockton San Joaquin 0.313% 0.383% 0.3256176%
City Tracy San Joaquin 0.084% 0.0692047%
County San Luis Obispo County San Luis Obispo 0.816% 0.999% 0.8484126% City Arroyo Grande San Luis Obispo 0.024% 0.0199053%
City Atascadero San Luis Obispo 0.029% 0.0240680%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 255 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
12 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles) San Luis Obispo 0.043% 0.0353456% City Grover Beach San Luis Obispo 0.017% 0.0137881%
City Morro Bay San Luis Obispo 0.020% 0.0160922%
City San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo 0.077% 0.0637841%
County San Mateo County San Mateo 1.074% 1.313% 1.1159599% City Belmont San Mateo 0.021% 0.0169860%
City Burlingame San Mateo 0.019% 0.0152537%
City Daly City San Mateo 0.044% 0.0363880%
City East Palo Alto San Mateo 0.013% 0.0103982%
City Foster City San Mateo 0.020% 0.0166101%
City Half Moon Bay San Mateo 0.004% 0.0031638%
City Hillsborough San Mateo 0.013% 0.0110029%
City Menlo Park San Mateo 0.015% 0.0126209%
City Millbrae San Mateo 0.013% 0.0105836%
City Pacifica San Mateo 0.016% 0.0130625%
City Redwood City San Mateo 0.056% 0.0463511%
City San Bruno San Mateo 0.021% 0.0172161%
City San Carlos San Mateo 0.013% 0.0108885%
City San Mateo San Mateo 0.052% 0.0425841%
City South San Francisco San Mateo 0.043% 0.0353943%
County Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara 1.132% 1.385% 1.1768968% City Carpinteria Santa Barbara 0.001% 0.0008938%
City Goleta Santa Barbara 0.004% 0.0028969%
City Lompoc Santa Barbara 0.047% 0.0389379%
City Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 0.122% 0.1004559%
City Santa Maria Santa Barbara 0.058% 0.0479179%
County Santa Clara County Santa Clara 2.404% 2.941% 2.4987553% City Campbell Santa Clara 0.014% 0.0112566%
City Cupertino Santa Clara 0.008% 0.0066824%
City Gilroy Santa Clara 0.025% 0.0202891%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 256 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
13 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Los Altos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103338%
City Los Gatos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103220%
City Milpitas Santa Clara 0.036% 0.0298120%
City Morgan Hill Santa Clara 0.015% 0.0124619%
City Mountain View Santa Clara 0.041% 0.0334608%
City Palo Alto Santa Clara 0.039% 0.0323080%
City San Jose Santa Clara 0.294% 0.360% 0.3054960%
City Santa Clara Santa Clara 0.067% 0.0549723%
City Saratoga Santa Clara 0.004% 0.0034161%
City Sunnyvale Santa Clara 0.053% 0.0434069%
County Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz 0.783% 0.957% 0.8135396% City Capitola Santa Cruz 0.020% 0.0168191%
City Santa Cruz Santa Cruz 0.143% 0.1180348%
City Scotts Valley Santa Cruz 0.015% 0.0126525%
City Watsonville Santa Cruz 0.063% 0.0520136%
County Shasta County Shasta 1.095% 1.339% 1.1380191%
City Anderson Shasta 0.024% 0.0198896%
City Redding Shasta 0.284% 0.2334841%
City Shasta Lake Shasta 0.004% 0.0031993%
County Siskiyou County Siskiyou 0.228% 0.279% 0.2373393% County Solano County Solano 0.760% 0.6260795%
City Benicia Solano 0.031% 0.0253903%
City Dixon Solano 0.016% 0.0130849%
City Fairfield Solano 0.109% 0.0897317%
City Suisun City Solano 0.021% 0.0176183%
City Vacaville Solano 0.119% 0.0976497%
City Vallejo Solano 0.167% 0.1373644%
County Sonoma County Sonoma 1.218% 1.490% 1.2661290%
City Healdsburg Sonoma 0.032% 0.0266929%
City Petaluma Sonoma 0.081% 0.0667507%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 257 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
14 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Rohnert Park Sonoma 0.041% 0.0340759%
City Santa Rosa Sonoma 0.184% 0.1519070%
City Sonoma Sonoma 0.022% 0.0183438%
City Windsor Sonoma 0.016% 0.0129298%
County Stanislaus County Stanislaus 1.722% 1.4182273%
City Ceres Stanislaus 0.041% 0.0340260%
City Modesto Stanislaus 0.217% 0.1788759%
City Newman Stanislaus 0.006% 0.0046964%
City Oakdale Stanislaus 0.018% 0.0145531%
City Patterson Stanislaus 0.015% 0.0126590%
City Riverbank Stanislaus 0.010% 0.0085699%
City Turlock Stanislaus 0.065% 0.0531966%
County Sutter County Sutter 0.306% 0.374% 0.3179548%
City Yuba City Sutter 0.074% 0.0606242%
County Tehama County Tehama 0.213% 0.261% 0.2216654%
City Red Bluff Tehama 0.014% 0.0117771%
County Trinity County Trinity 0.082% 0.101% 0.0855476%
County Tulare County Tulare 0.809% 0.990% 0.8410949%
City Dinuba Tulare 0.014% 0.0116929%
City Exeter Tulare 0.004% 0.0032479%
City Farmersville Tulare 0.003% 0.0027879%
City Lindsay Tulare 0.007% 0.0057111%
City Porterville Tulare 0.021% 0.0171845%
City Tulare Tulare 0.037% 0.0302273%
City Visalia Tulare 0.066% 0.0545872%
County Tuolumne County Tuolumne 0.486% 0.594% 0.5047621% County Ventura County Ventura 2.192% 2.681% 2.2781201%
City Camarillo Ventura 0.002% 0.0012815%
City Fillmore Ventura 0.002% 0.0020294%
City Moorpark Ventura 0.008% 0.0067337%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 258 April 11, 2023
APPENDIX 1
15 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Oxnard Ventura 0.156% 0.190% 0.1617338%
City Port Hueneme Ventura 0.021% 0.0174145%
City San Buenaventura (Ventura) Ventura 0.085% 0.0702181% City Santa Paula Ventura 0.014% 0.0119072%
City Simi Valley Ventura 0.065% 0.0533043%
City Thousand Oaks Ventura 0.022% 0.0179902%
County Yolo County Yolo 0.357% 0.437% 0.3713319%
City Davis Yolo 0.055% 0.0451747%
City West Sacramento Yolo 0.066% 0.0544321%
City Woodland Yolo 0.058% 0.0477904%
County Yuba County Yuba 0.214% 0.262% 0.2225679%
City Marysville Yuba 0.014% 0.0112079%
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 259 April 11, 2023
1 6
APPENDIX 2
Cost Reimbursement Procedure

Costs does not include attorneys’ fees, costs, or expenses incurred by private contingency fee counsel. No part of the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be used to reimburse Costs.
b) First Claims Date means October 1, 2023 or when all applications for reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in part, from funds available under Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, Section XIV and Exhibit R of the Teva Settlement Agreement, Section XIII and Exhibit R of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement, Section XI and Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the CVS Settlement Agreement, or Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, have been finally determined under the provisions of those agreements, whichever comes first. c) Special Master means a retired judicial officer or former public lawyer, not presently employed or retained by a Plaintiff Subdivision, who will aggregate, review, and determine the reasonable Costs to be awarded to each Plaintiff Subdivision that submits a claim for reimbursement of Costs. The Special Master will be selected by a majority vote of the votes cast by Plaintiff Subdivisions, with each such subdivision having one vote. d) Plaintiff Subdivision Committee means the committee of Plaintiff Subdivisions that will review and approve the invoices submitted by the Special Master reflecting his or her reasonable time and expenses.

2. Cost Reimbursement to Plaintiff Subdivision
a) Purpose. Substantial resources have been expended to hold Opioid Defendants accountable for creating and profiting from the opioid crisis, and this effort has been a significant catalyst in creating National Opioid Settlements with various manufacturers, distributors, and chain pharmacies.
b) Claims Procedure.
i. If a Plaintiff Subdivision is eligible to seek reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 260 April 11, 2023
1 7
part, from funds available under Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, Section XIV and Exhibit R of the Teva Settlement Agreement, Section XIII and Exhibit R of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the CVS Settlement Agreement, Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, Section X or Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement, or Section XI or Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, it must first make a timely application for reimbursement from such funds. To allow sufficient time for determination of those applications, no claim for Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund under this Agreement may be made before the First Claims Date.
ii. A Plaintiff Subdivision that wishes to be reimbursed from the CA Subdivision Fund must submit a claim to the Special Master no later than forty-five (45) days after the First Claims Date. The Special Master will then compile and redistribute the aggregated claim totals for each Plaintiff Subdivision via email to representatives of all the Plaintiff Subdivisions. A claim for attorney and staff time must list, for each attorney or staff member included in the claim, the following information: name, title, total hours claimed, hourly rate (including, if sought, benefits and share of overhead), and narrative summarizing the general nature of the work performed by the attorney or staff member. For reimbursement of “hard” costs, the subdivision may aggregate across a category (e.g., total for travel costs). It is the intention of the Plaintiff Subdivisions that submission of documents related to reimbursement of Costs does not waive any attorney-client privilege or exemptions to the California Public Records Act.
iii. The Special Master may request, at his or her sole option, additional documents or details to assist in the final award of Costs.
iv. The Special Master will review claims for reasonableness and will notify each Plaintiff Subdivision of the final determination of its claim, and will provide a list of all final awards to all Plaintiff Subdivisions by email or, upon request, via First Class U.S. Mail. Any Plaintiff Subdivision may ask the Special Master to reconsider any final award within twenty-one (21) days. The Special Master will make a final determination on any such reconsideration request within thirty (30) days of receipt.
v. Any decision of the Special Master is final and binding, and will be considered under the California Arbitration Act, Code of Civil Procedure section 1280 et seq. as a final arbitration award. Nothing in this agreement is intended to expand the scope of judicial review of the final award for errors of fact or law, and the Parties agree that they may only seek to vacate the award if clear and convincing evidence demonstrates one of the factors set forth in Code of Civil Procedure, section 1286.2, subdivision (a). Plaintiff Subdivisions will have fourteen (14) days after all final awards are made, together with any final determination of a request for DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 261 April 11, 2023
1 8
reconsideration, to seek review in the Superior Court of California, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285, where the State has filed its Consent Judgment. vi. The Special Master will prepare a report of Costs that includes his or her fees and expenses at least ninety (90) days before the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Special Master’s preparation of a report of Costs does not discharge a Plaintiff Subdivision’s reporting requirement under Section V(B)(2) of the Walmart Settlement Agreement.
vii. A member of the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee, which is a CA Participating Subdivision, will submit to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Walmart a report of the fees and expenses incurred by the Special Master pursuant to Section V(B)(2) of the Walmart Settlement Agreement.
c) Claims Priority and Limitation.
i. The Special Master will submit invoices for compensation of reasonable fees and expenses to the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee no later than ninety (90) days prior to the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Plaintiff Subdivision Committee will promptly review and, if reasonable, approve the Special Master’s invoice for compensation. The Plaintiff Subdivision Committee will submit approved invoices to the Settlement Fund Administrator for payment. The Special Master’s approved invoices have priority and will be paid first from the CA Subdivision Fund before any award of Costs, subject to the limitation in Section

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 262 April 11, 2023
1 9
d) Collateral Source Payments and Third-Party Settlement. i. In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision is awarded compensation, in whole or in part, by any source of funds created as a result of litigation against an Opioid Defendant for its reasonable Costs, it will reduce its claim for Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund by that amount. If a Plaintiff Subdivision has already received a final award of Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund, it will repay the fund up to the prior award of Costs via a payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator or notify the Settlement Fund Administrator that its allocation from the next and subsequent Annual Payments should be reduced accordingly. If the Plaintiff Subdivision is repaying any prior award of Costs, that repayment will occur as soon as is feasible after the Plaintiff Subdivision’s receipt of Cost funds from the collateral source, but no more than 90 days after its receipt from the collateral source. The Settlement Fund Administrator will add any repaid Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund. Any Plaintiff Subdivision that has submitted for reimbursement to any national fund and has not received a final determination by the First Claims Date may request that the settlement administrator withhold some or all of its payment from the CA Subdivision Fund in order to avoid repayment.
ii. In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision reaches a monetary settlement or compromise against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement, the monetary portion of such settlement, net of fees paid to outside contingency fee counsel and of funds earmarked strictly for abatement, will be credited against its Costs and the subdivision will be ineligible to recover those credited Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund. Plaintiff Subdivisions negotiating monetary settlements or compromises against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement will negotiate for funds to repay any Costs it previously received from the CA Subdivision Fund or for Costs it otherwise might be eligible to claim from the CA Subdivision Fund. If such a settlement is paid after all final approved claims for Costs by all Plaintiff Subdivisions are satisfied in full, the settling subdivision will reimburse the CA Subdivision Fund in that amount by making payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator to add to the CA Subdivision Fund in a manner consistent with the repayments described in section 2.d.i above.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 263 April 11, 2023
1 APPENDIX 3

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Walmart Settlement Agreement and CA Walmart Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Walmart Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL], together with any contingency fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the national Attorney Fee Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the total gross recovery of [SUBDIVISION] from the Walmart Settlement.
[COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created under the Walmart Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of “State BackStop Agreement” in Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between “a Settling State” and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
[DATE] [SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
DocuSign Envelope ID: E1DCEE34-C794-4457-97CA-F4C5BF8B3399 264 April 11, 2023

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 11th, 2023
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Rick Vasquez, WWTP Chief Operator
SUBJECT: Council to Authorize Agreement with Bakersfield Well and Pump for Annual Sampling Service.

BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

The Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) has many regulatory requirements to stay in compliance with its operating permit. One of those regulations is sampling of the 3 monitoring wells on an annual and semi-annual basis. The 3 wells are located at Central Park (1) and WWTP (2).

The semi-annual sampling has been completed for FY 22-23. This staff report is for the annual sampling period that is approaching soon.

Due to the depth of the monitoring wells, we do not have the equipment to perform this service ourselves. Therefore, Bakersfield Well and Pump Co. (BWP) has been providing this service to the City of California City for several years and has not raised their price once.

BWP will also deliver the samples to the regulatory laboratory at no additional cost, freeing an employee from having to perform this task that would take a better part of a day.

This item was specifically budgeted for in the 22/23 budget year in line 52-5213-310 contracts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Current Balance $ 37,000.00
Amount Requested from Fund $ 3,000.00
Amount Remaining from Fund $ 34,000.00
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an Agreement with Bakersfield Well and Pump for Sample Pumping Services for the FY 22-23.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Invoice from Bakersfield Well and Pump for last years’ service.

ITEM NO. CC 6.
265 April 11, 2023
266 April 11, 2023
ITEM NO. CB 1.

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
APRIL 11, 2023
PREPARED BY: Inge Elmes, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: QUAD KNOPF, INC. additional funding request

BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION
On May 21, 2020, QK Inc. and RDN, Inc., jointly submitted a response to the City of California City RFQ for Professional Engineering Services for Water and Sewer Master Plans Update, Prepare Recycled Water Study, Prepare New Water Standby Fee Study and Water Availability Study with a proposed project completion date of June 2021. As there has been several city representative changes on this project, please see timeline attached, the QK/RDN team is concerned about the outcomes for the city should the city not move forward with the completion of the study. QK is requesting additional funding to complete the project based on the city’s current needs and to get to a defendable Prop 218 hearing.

FISCAL IMPACT
An additional cost of $16,739.00 will be split evenly between water and sewer to complete the project.

Allocated to GL code 51-5115-630 and 52-5213-315.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending to approve the additional funding to complete the project and amend the contract.

ATTACHMENTS
A. Memo from QK
B. Amendment to Contract
C. Presentation
267 April 11, 2023
Date: March 11, 2023 Project No.: 210070 / 1 /All
To: Inge Elmes, Acting City Manager
From: Brian Shoener
Subject: California City Projects
cc: Inge Elmes, Sonia Tapia, Amber Aguayo
Immediate request for action and approval of next steps for the California City Water and Wastewater Project:

Background:

On May 21, 2020, QK, Inc. and RDN, Inc. jointly submitted a response to the City of California City RFQ for Professional Engineering Services for Water and Sewer Master Plans Update, Prepare Recycled Water Study, Prepare New Water Standby Fee Study and Water Availability Study with a proposed project completion date of June 2021. As there have been a number of City representative changes on this project, below is a timeline of events intended to provided history, but more importantly, to decide on a path forward with urgency as the QK/ RDN team is concerned about the outcomes for the City should the City not move forward with the completion of the study. This meeting is held to assist in providing suggested direction and to inform the City of unintended consequences of any further delay or inaction.

1. July 15, 2020, California City selected the QK Team. The work was not authorized with all data needed to start at this time.

2. February 9, 2021, RDN entered into a subconsultant agreement with QK to perform the City of California City Rate and Fee Studies with a not-to-exceed budget of $77,080 for the following scope of services:
a. Water rate study
b. Recycled water rate study
c. Sewer rate study
d. Water and sewer capacity fee study
e. Water and sewer standby fee study

3. February 11, 2021, the QK Team kicked off the Study with City staff.

4. The City has changed direction with four city managers since the study kickoff and Public Works Director Joe Barragan, a primary POC for the Study, was no longer employed as of September 2021):
a. Anna Linn (April 2019 – July 2021)
b. Anne Ambrose (July 2021 – May 2022)
c. Doug Dunford (May 2022 – Sep 2022)
d. Dr. Jim Hart (September 2022 – Current)

5. QK submitted a draft of the 2020 UWMP on May 21, 2021.

6. QK submitted a draft water and wastewater master plan to the City on August 23, 2021.
268 April 11, 2023
a. These documents included the cessation of using AVEK water and the planned expansion of the prison.
b. The cessation of AVEK water affected the water master plan. c. The planned expansion of the prison had major impacts on the water and wastewater master plan.

7. May 2022, City staff directed QK that AVEK water would remain and the prison expansion would not take place until 5 or more years out in the future.

8. May 20, 2022 QK submitted updated drafts of the water and wastewater master plans to the City.

9. November 2, 2022, Met with new City Manager, Water Department Staff and Wastewater Department Staff (via phone call).
a. Discussed during the meeting was the Technical Memorandums for the water system master plan dated October 17, 2022 and the Technical Memorandums for the wastewater system master plan dated September 19, 2022. b. The City Manager agreed with findings of the water and wastewater memoranda.

These memoranda will be used to finalize the water and wastewater master plans. c. The rate studies will use the approved project costs and to finalize the water and wastewater rate studies. A draft of final rate studies was issued to the City in early January 2023.

10. Meetings with City Council members was to be scheduled to discuss the master plans and rate studies in January 2023 with the goal of starting the Prop 218 in March/April 2023.

This did not occur.

11. The City has directed RDN to perform additional tasks or incorporate new or updated data because of City staff attrition, changing Study direction, or City delays to Study schedule. These updates include:
a. Identified data gaps and updated the financial model as data gaps were reconciled in July 2021.
b. Created senior housing rates for sewer system and irrigation rates with options in August 2021.
c. Met with new City Manager Anne Ambrose is September 2021 to get her up to speed with study updates. RDN drafted a memorandum for Ms. Ambrose’s review and solicited feedback for the City’s direction moving forward with the study.
d. Incorporated new customer usage data into the rate model in October 2021 and prepared a corresponding memorandum presented at a City meeting. e. Met with City staff to discuss new City data available in December 2021. f. Cleaned, reconciled, and updated new City billing data obtained in January 2022 and incorporated these data into the financial model.
g. Developed sewer rate options in August 2021, incorporating a planned prison expansion assuming 2,500 new beds in the prison. Thereafter, it was revealed that the prison expansion was not permitted, and therefore, RDN would need to rework the entire financial plan and cost of service analysis associated with capacity expansion. RDN was then directed to model a hospital prison expansion in February 2022 because the City had permitted an expansion, but as of November 2022, there is no prison expansion in the planning horizon. h. Produced multiple feasibility analyses (July 2021, August 2021, December 2021, 269 April 11, 2023
and August 2022) to facilitate golf course irrigation with recycled water, AVEK water, and potable water supplies.
i. Incorporated new budgetary documents and reprojected future O&M costs (March 2021, July 2021, December 2021, and October 2022) based on changing inflation numbers and management priorities.
j. Reevaluated capital needs, planning, and funding options as leadership changed throughout the Study.
k. Received final O&M and CIP numbers in October 2022, which will need to be added to the financial model. RDN will also need to meet with City staff to obtain final goals for the Study. After goals are established and data are incorporated into the model, RDN will then build a final financial plan, cost of service analysis, and rates/fees that are Proposition 218 and 26-compliant for City implementation by July 1, 2023.

12. On March 3, 2023, the City, QK, and RDN met to discuss updated data, information, and assumptions to incorporate into the rate study analysis. QK and RDN noted that additional resources are required to update the analysis, Currently, the budget is expended based on the multiple changes identified above. To facilitate the additional meetings, incorporate new information and finalize all the reports, the teams estimate an additional fee of $25,000 added to previous budget for QK’s portion.

The following table presents RDN’s estimated labor hours and costs to complete the water, recycled water, and sewer rate studies for $19,495. At a minimum, RDN recommends that the City complete the rate studies (Task 1, 2, and 3). The City may accomplish its long-term financial goals and objectives, along with Proposition 218 compliance, without the fee studies. If the City believes the fee studies are a priority, the City may elect to complete water and sewer capacity fee and standby fee studies for an additional cost of $30,380. Our recommendation to complete the rate studies considers the length of time transpired since the study kicked off, the amount of additional City staff time and information required to accomplish the fee studies, and the potential further delay to implementing updated rates.

For RDN’s portion, depending on the scope selected below, it is estimated to require between $20,000 and $50,000 as outlined below:
270 April 11, 2023
Summary: With the history described above, the QK/ RDN team urgently requests the City immediately authorize and work with QK/RDN on next steps moving forward. Some of which is marked as complete.

1. Submit draft master plans and rate study to City staff and council for review as soon as possible pending City approval of project lists and costs. a. Complete with minor comments received from City and incorporated, ready to be resubmitted.

2. Hold public hearings regarding rate study and master plans.

3. Begin to Prop 218 process in May. Have new rates implemented by August 2023. 271 April 11, 2023
a. Jim Hart indicated he will be contract City manager until tomorrow (March 9, 2023). Suggest this authorization is underway before another change of staff occurs and further delays are encountered.

As discussed, we requested that the following actions are approved and enacted prior to the next City Manager change to address consequences of not moving forward as-soon-aspossible.

1. Avoid incurring further debt:
a. When water rates were lowered in March 2020 in response to the Covid pandemic, the water department has consistently operated at a deficit. Each month that passes, the water department loses more money. The new water rates will address this deficit and assist to bring rates to a level adequate to support ongoing maintenance and provide for funding of the projects identified in the water master plan.

2. Address City Golf course- (Address violation of Prop 218). a. The Golf course is a major user of potable water and the only user of tertiary treated water from the wastewater plant. The golf course does not pay for the potable water or tertiary treated water – which are significant costs. b. These costs are borne by the rest of the rate payers. This is a violation of Prop 218.
c. The master plans and rate studies recommend the golf course drill an agriculture well to supply irrigation water (cease using potable water) and that the wastewater plant only provide secondary treatment and dispose of water via onsite percolation ponds (cease using tertiary wastewater).

3. Address Non-Compliance Prop 218 issues.
a. California City residents who have expressed concerns about the current water and sewer rates and their non-compliance with Prop 218. b. A Kern County grand jury appears to agree with the with appearance of City non-compliance with Prop 218.
c. Adopting the new water and sewer rates will address Prop 218 compliance issues.

4. Provide legal and consistent City direction.
a. With the frequent turnover of City staff (including Jim Hart leaving this week), setting a guideline for future water and wastewater projects will keep the City moving forward in a focused manner.

272 April 11, 2023
AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

BETWEEN CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY
AND QUAD KNOPF, INC. dba QK
THIS AMENDMENT to the Agreement between City of California City (hereafter “Client”) and Quad Knopf, Inc. dba QK (hereafter “Consultant”) is made this 11th day of April, 2023:

WHEREAS, on January 12, 2021, Client and Consultant entered into a contract whereby Consultant would provide consulting services to develop the Water and Sewer Master Plan Update (“Project”), and
WHEREAS, Additional amount of $16,739.00 is requested to adjust tasks to deliver Task 1, 2, and 3, removing Tasks 4 and 5, and to extend completion date for reports to June 30, 2023. The background is provided in the attached memorandum dated March 8, 2023, but the fee requested assumes utilizing and reallocating existing contract fees.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties as follows:

1. That the original Contract shall be amended to include the additional budget request described herein in the amount of $16,739.00.

EXCEPT as specifically modified above, all of the remaining terms and conditions of the Agreement between City of California City and Quad Knopf, Inc. dba QK dated January 12, 2021 shall remain and continue in full force and effect.

QUAD KNOPF, INC. dba QK CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY
By: By:

Amber Aguayo Name: Inge Elmes
CFO/COO Title: Acting City Manager
273 April 11, 2023
QK and RDN
– Water and Wastewater
Master Plans and Rate Studies
Additional Funding Request
274 April
April 11, 2023
11, 2023
Outline
• Introduction
• Brian Shoener, QK
• Anthony Elowsky, RDN
• Background to date
• Master Plans Status
• Rate Study Status
• Scope and Fee to Complete
• Wrap Up
275 April 11, 2023
Background
May 21, 2020 – QK & RDN submitted a proposal for Water and Sewer Master Plans and Rate Studies
July 15, 2020 – QK & RDN were selected
February 11, 2021 – Project kick off held
Changes in City Staff
Started with PW Director Joe Barragan (until September 2021). Position currently vacant.

Several City Managers:
• Anna Linn (April 2019 – July 2021)
• Anne Ambrose (July 2021 – May 2022)
• Doug Dunford (May 2022 – Sep 2022)
• Dr. Jim Hart (September 2022 – March 2023)
• Inge Elmes (Current)
Impacts on Master Plans and Rate Studies
276 April 11, 2023
Background
August 23, 2021 – Draft water and wastewater plans submitted to City for view. • These documents included the cessation of using AVEK water and the planned expansion of the prison.
• The cessation of AVEK water key consideration to the water master plan. • The planned expansion of the prison additionally had major impacts on the water and wastewater master plan.
• Water supply to gold course.

May 2022 - City staff directed QK that AVEK water would remain, however, the prison expansion would not take place until five or more years out in the future.

May 20, 2022 - QK submitted updated drafts of the water and wastewater master plans to the City.

November 2, 2022 - Met with City Manager (Jim Hart), Water Department Staff and Wastewater Department Staff (via phone call).
• City staff agreed with the master plans.
• Rate studies could move forward.
277 April 11, 2023
Background (Rate Studies)
February 2, 2021 – Data request sent to City staff.

April 22, 2021 – Customer data and additional financial data received.

July 15, 2021 – Initial rate recommendations presented to City staff. • Recommendations included prison expansion, Prop 218 compliant rates for the golf course and current rate categories, and initial capital plan based on WWTP upgrades.
• Staff provided updated data and assumptions and requested reanalysis of each item.

October 28, 2021 – Provided City staff with updated recommendations based on new priorities, assumptions, and data established in July 2021. • City Manager requested an updated analysis with new priorities and assumptions, which conflicted with those initially provided by DPW. 278 April 11, 2023
Background (rate studies cont.)
February 16, 2022 – City staff finalized new capital project list.

April 28, 2022 – City staff provided a new sewer budget.

August 30, 2022 – Updated rate recommendations were provided to City staff. • Recommendations included no prison expansion, Prop 218 compliant rates for the golf course and updated rate categories, and updated capital projects list. RDN requested updated budget and customer data to bring study assumptions up-to-date.
• Rate implementation date TBD, FY 2023-24 discussed.

January 13, 2023 – Rate Study Memo including new CIP data provided to City staff.

March 1, 2023 – Second Rate Study Memo including updated assumptions and CIP data provided to City staff.

March 8, 2023 – Team met with City Manager, agreed to the importance of completing the rate study project, and promised FY2023 budget data. 279 April 11, 2023
Scope to Complete Rate Studies
To complete the water, recycled water, and sewer rate studies, current financial data, customer data, and study objectives need to be finalized and updated in the rate models and codified in administrative reports. Additionally, RDN must build consensus with decision makers and present the findings to the City Council and stakeholders through the Proposition 218 process.

1. Task 1: Water Rate Study

1. Effort: 4 hours reviewing data provided by city staff

2. Effort: 8 hours developing an updated financial plan

3. Effort: 4 hours developing an updated cost of service analysis

4. Effort: 8 hours designing Proposition 218 compliant rates

5. Effort: 24 hours presenting the results to City Council and staff, making any requested modifications, preparing presentations, and an administrative record

6. Effort: 10 hours preparing for and attending Proposition 218 hearing

2. Task 2: Recycled Water Rate Study

1. Effort: 2 hours reviewing data provided by city staff

2. Effort: 4 hours developing an updated financial plan

3. Effort: 2 hours developing an updated cost of service analysis

4. Effort: 3 hours designing Proposition 218 compliant rates

5. Effort: 2 hours presenting the results to City Council and staff, making any requested modifications, preparing presentations, and an administrative record

6. Effort: 3 hours preparing for and attending Proposition 218 hearing

3. Task 3: Sewer Rate Study

1. Effort: 4 hours reviewing data provided by city staff

2. Effort: 8 hours developing an updated financial plan

3. Effort: 4 hours developing an updated cost of service analysis

4. Effort: 8 hours designing Proposition 218 compliant rates

5. Effort: 24 hours presenting the results to City Council and staff, making any requested modifications, preparing presentations, and an administrative record

6. Effort: 10 hours preparing for and attending Proposition 218 hearing 280 April 11, 2023
Scope and Fee to Complete pg 1of2
Requesting additional $16,739 complete the project.

Scope:
1) Completion of Tasks 1 (Water Rate), 2 (Recycled Water Rate) and 3 (Sewer Rate) for studies. a) Effort: $19,495 RDN
b)Note: Cal City has provided most of the 2023 financials requested. Need water budget for current fiscal year.
2) Report revisions- The current draft Master Plans have been reviewed by City water and wastewater staff. It is anticipated that there will be comments and questions generated from council or other stakeholders who review the Master Plans. a) Effort: ~16 hours
3) Public Workshop – Presenting at one combined public workshop for both the water and wastewater Master Plans.
a) Effort: ~8 hours preparation for workshop (PowerPoint and other materials) b) Effort: ~8 hours for presentation and providing written responses from workshop. c) QK, will cover the time and travel costs and expenses for an overnight stay for the workshop. (QK will not charge the City for my attendance- which will cost QK approx. $2k- assuming this package is approved)
d)Note: This proposed fee assumes no additional meeting with Council or other stakeholders.
(Continued)
281 April 11, 2023
Scope and Fee to Complete pg 2of2
Requesting additional $16,739 complete the project.

Scope:
1) Engineering review of revised rate studies – Review of rate study reports and spreadsheets for engineering consistency with the Master Plans. a) Effort: ~12 hours
2) General Team Coordination with California City staff through end of project – attending regular meetings with California City and Rate Study staff. a) Effort: ~8 hours
3)Deliver the of Final Master Plans and Rate Studies – Assume PDF- no hardcopies. a) Note: Assuming no significant changes to Master Plan assumptions. All projects listed in the draft Master Plans and comments as answered stakeholders and council comments are consistent.
b) Effort: ~8 hours
282 April 11, 2023
Scope and Fee to Complete
Requesting additional $16,739 complete the project.

Contract Amount: $ 249,950
Total Cost- including:

Expended Amount (Billed and not yet billed): $ 234,060
Cost to Complete: QK- Identified above: $ 13,134
RDN – Rate Studies $ 19,495
TOTAL Cost*: $ 266,689
Amount Requested (Cost to Complete less original Contract) $ 16,739 *assuming no additional changes or delays
283 April 11, 2023
Next Steps
Upon authorization and appropriation to proceed, QK/RDN and City Team will complete the following:

1. Complete the three rate studies.

2. Public workshop.

3. Plan and rate study revisions based on comments.

4. Finalize Master Plans and Rate Studies.
284 April 11, 2023
Questions?
285 April 11, 2023
ITEM NO. CB 2.

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
APRIL 11, 2023
Prepared By: Inge Elmes, Acting City Manager

Subject: Professional Service Agreement with Interwest

BACKGROUND
The city has been without a full-time, in-house city planner since April 2021. The city contracted Interwest in September 2021 and then approved an extension in January 2022. The contract, and extension expired June 30, 2022. Since that time Interwest has agreed to continue to work with the city on a month-to-month basis.

Paul Junker and his planning team have earnestly provided the city planning department with much needed support. Their work has resulted in many planning project approvals. They have also built a stable relationship with our city staff and together they are working hard to move projects toward approval.

Below is a summary which lists the past efforts and accomplishment by Interwest, along with the current and future efforts by Interwest.

City staff and Interwest have reviewed the planning needs of the city and Interwest has agreed to proceed with assisting the city on a month-to-month basis for the 22/23 fiscal year. The estimated month to month invoices is approximately $20,000.00 a month.

In the meantime, I am working with staff to find new paths to recruit a full-time, in-house planner.

SUMMARY
Past efforts and accomplishments by Interwest in California City:
• Prepared a comprehensive assessment of California City’s development related practices, including recommendations for improving services.
• Supported the City in day-to-day planning operations. • Restructured the Site Plan Review process to better document approvals and to ensure cannabis applicants have documentation required for State licensing. • Led revision of Industrial development standards, thereby resolving code issues that were causing delays of proposed tentative maps and site plan reviews. • Led review of Core Civic project and assisted City in determining that the proposed Core Civic project could have substantially compromised City water and wastewater infrastructure. • Led expedited review of the Hyundai Technical Center review to meet Hyundai’s aggressive schedule for project construction.
• Led City reviews of the Kudu and Bellefield solar projects. • Investigated and provided guidance on cannabis temporary greenhouses. • Completed minor CEQA reviews for City projects.
• Represented City on the Kern County Council of Governments Technical Transportation Advisory Committee – recently supported City in securing $2.8 million in CMAC funding. 286 April 11, 2023
• Reviewed and provided guidance on the Kern County Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) process.
• Prepared Draft SB 9 Municipal Code Amendments.
• Completed 2022 Housing Element Annual Progress Report. • Completed Site Plan reviews for 34 projects since February 2022:
o February 2022—SPR 18-04
o March 2022—SPR 21-33
o April 2022—SPR 17-72, 19-30, 21-10, 21-15, 21-55, 21-05 o July 2022—SPR 21-58, 22-01, 22-14
o August 2022—SPR 21-20
o September 2022—SPR 21-41, 21-57, 20-43, 21-36, 21-43, 21-45 o October 2022—SPR 21-24, 21-44, 21-47, 22-28
o December 2022—SPR 21-05, 22-18, 22-07, 22-46, 20-44
o January 2023—SPR 22-02, 21-39, 21-53, 22-43,
o February 2023—SPR 22-10, 22-56, 22-31
Current and future efforts of Interwest to support California City:
• Lead weekly Development Services Meeting that provides a coordination forum for Planning, Building Engineering and Fire Departments.
• Overseeing environmental compliance of Kudu solar project. • Processing general plan and zoning amendments for land in the vicinity of Padron Metal. • Preparing SB 9 Municipal Code Amendments for adoption. • Preparing Municipal Code Amendments related to residential development on California City Boulevard.

RECOMMENDATION
• Staff recommends the City Council approve a month-to-month contract starting July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023; and
• Staff is seeking direction from the City Council at this time and is open for discussion.

FISCAL IMPACT
• GL 10-4170-310 (Planning, Professional Services)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: N/A
ATTACHMENT(S):
• Attachment A - Professional Services Agreement
287 April 11, 2023
2022

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
(Engagement: Professional Planning and Community Development Company) (Parties: Interwest Consulting Group, Inc., and City of California City)

THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (hereinafter, “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 11th day of April 2023 (hereinafter, the “Effective Date”) by and between the CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, a municipal corporation (hereinafter, “CITY”) and INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP, INC. (hereinafter, “CONSULTANT”). For the purposes of this Agreement, CITY and CONSULTANT may be referred to collectively by the capitalized term “Parties.” The capitalized term “Party” may refer to CITY or CONSULTANT interchangeably, as appropriate.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY requires professional planning and community development company services; and
WHEREAS, CITY staff has determined that CONSULTANT possesses the experience, skills and training necessary to competently provide such services to CITY; and WHEREAS, the execution of this Agreement was approved by the California City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 11, 2023, under Agenda Item No. CB 2.

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, CITY and CONSULTANT agree as follows:

ENGAGEMENT TERMS

1.1 TERM: This Agreement shall have a month-to-month term commencing from the Effective Date (hereinafter, the “Term”). Nothing in this Section shall operate to prohibit or otherwise restrict the CITY’s ability to terminate this Agreement at any time for convenience or for cause as provided under Article V (Termination), below.

1.2 SCOPE OF WORK:

A. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, CONSULTANT agrees to provide the services and tasks described in that certain proposal of CONSULTANT entitled “Proposal of Planning Services” (hereinafter, the “Scope of Work”) which is attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit “A”. CONSULTANT further agrees to furnish to CITY all labor, materials, tools, supplies, equipment, services, tasks and incidental and customary work necessary to competently perform and timely complete the services and tasks set forth in the Scope of Work. For the purposes of this Agreement the aforementioned services and tasks set forth in the Scope of Work shall hereinafter be referred to generally by the capitalized term “Work.” 288 April 11, 2023

1.3 PROSECUTION OF WORK:

A. CONSULTANT shall perform the Work continuously and with due diligence so as to complete the Work by the completion date indicated in each Work Order. CONSULTANT shall cooperate with CITY and in no manner interfere with the work of CITY, its employees or other consultants, contractors or agents;
B. CONSULTANT shall not claim or be entitled to receive any compensation or damage because of the failure of CONSULTANT, or its subconsultants, to have related services or tasks completed in a timely manner;
C. CONSULTANT shall at all times enforce strict discipline and good order among CONSULTANT’s employees; and
D. CONSULTANT, at its sole expense, shall pay all sales, consumer, use or other similar taxes required by law.

1.4 COMPENSATION:

A. CONSULTANT shall perform the Work in accordance with the compensation schedule attached as Exhibit A to the Scope of Work (the “Approved Compensation Schedule”).

B. The terms of paragraph A of this section notwithstanding, the Parties acknowledge and agree as follows:
(i) On October 11, 2021, the Parties entered into a professional services agreement (the “Prior Agreement”) that authorized funding of $184,130 for the evaluation of City development practices and procedures and for providing professional planning services, with an agreement termination date of October 11, 2022; (ii) On January 25, 2022, the City Council approved the First Amendment to the Prior Agreement for additional funding in the amount of $189,698 (total funding $373,828) with the expectation that such amount would fund services through the end of fiscal year on June 30, 2022 and Exhibit B Fee Schedule was amended to delete and replace with the Planning Staff Support Services Budget Table and add the Proposed Budget Table. All other tasks and services would remain the same. (iii) CONSULTANT has continued to provide services uninterrupted since June 30, 2022, through April 1, 2023 (the “Interim Period”).
(iv) The total aggregate sums invoiced by CONSULTANT to CITY prior to and during the Interim Period is approximately $191,563 in excess of total authorized funding the “Interim Period Invoiced Sums”) for Work performed by CONSULTANT and passthrough costs incurred by CONSULTANT; and (v) The sums invoiced by CONSULTANT were in accordance with the tasks and duties set forth in the Prior Agreement.

By execution of this Agreement, as approved by the City Council for the City of California City, CITY affirms that all services and tasks invoiced by CONSULTANT prior to and during the Interim Period were in fact performed and completed to the satisfaction of CITY and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Prior Agreement. In recognition of the foregoing and addition to any other compensation contemplated under this Agreement, CITY affirms that the payment of the Interim Period Invoiced Sums was in consideration for services rendered by CONSULTANT to the satisfaction of CITY. In turn, CONSULTANT acknowledges and agrees that (i) it has in fact been fully compensated for all services and tasks performed by CONSULTANT during the Interim Period and 289 April 11, 2023
all eligible pass-through costs incurred during the Interim Period; (ii) all of the Interim Period Invoiced Sums have been paid in full; and (iii) CONSULTANT is not entitled to any additional compensation for any services and tasks performed or eligible pass-through costs incurred by CONSULTANT during the Interim Period.

1.5 PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION: The Sum will be paid to CONSULTANT in monthly increments as the Work is completed. Following the conclusion of each calendar month, CONSULTANT will submit to CITY an itemized invoice indicating the services performed and tasks completed during the recently concluded calendar month, including services and tasks performed and the reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses incurred. If the amount of CONSULTANT’s monthly compensation is a function of hours worked by CONSULTANT’s personnel, the invoice should indicate the number of hours worked in the recently concluded calendar month, the persons responsible for performing the Work, the rate of compensation at which such services and tasks were performed, the subtotal for each task and service performed and a grand total for all services performed. Within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of each invoice, CITY will notify CONSULTANT in writing of any disputed amounts included in the invoice. Within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt of each invoice, CITY will pay all undisputed amounts included on the invoice. CITY will not withhold applicable taxes or other authorized deductions from payments made to CONSULTANT.

Furthermore, CONSULTANT will only be compensated for the reasonable value of the services, tasks and other Work performed up to the time of cessation or abandonment, less a deduction for any damages, costs or additional expenses which CITY may incur as a result of CONSULTANT’s cessation or abandonment.

II.

PERFORMANCE OF AGREEMENT

2.1 CITY’S REPRESENTATIVE: The CITY hereby designates Inge Elmes, Acting City Manager, (hereinafter, the “City Representative”) to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement. The City Representative or their designee will act on behalf of the CITY for all purposes under this Agreement. CONSULTANT will not accept directions or orders from any person other than the City Representative or their designee.

2.2 CONSULTANT REPRESENTATIVE: CONSULTANT hereby designates Paul Junker, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (hereinafter, “Consultant Representative”).

Consultant Representative will have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the CONSULTANT for all purposes under this Agreement. Consultant Representative or their designee will supervise and direct the performance of the Work, using their best skill and attention, and will be 290 April 11, 2023
responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Work under this Agreement. Notice to the Consultant Representative will constitute notice to CONSULTANT.

2.3 COORDINATION OF SERVICE; CONFORMANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS: CONSULTANT agrees to work closely with CITY staff in the performance of the Work and this Agreement and will be available to CITY staff and the CITY Representative at all reasonable times. All work prepared by CONSULTANT will be subject to inspection and approval by CITY Representative or their designees.

2.4 STANDARD OF CARE; PERFORMANCE OF EMPLOYEES: CONSULTANT represents, acknowledges and agrees to the following:

A. CONSULTANT will perform all Work skillfully, competently and to the highest standards of CONSULTANT’s profession;
B. CONSULTANT shall at all times employ such force, plant, materials, and tools as will be sufficient in the opinion of the CITY to perform the Services within the time limits established, and as provided herein. It is understood and agreed that said tools, equipment, apparatus, facilities, labor, and material shall be furnished and said Services performed and completed as required by the Agreement, and subject to the approval of the CITY’s authorized representative;
C. CONSULTANT will perform all Work in a manner reasonably satisfactory to the CITY; D. CONSULTANT will comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, including the conflict of interest provisions of Government Code Section 1090 and the Political Reform Act (Government Code Section 81000 et seq.) CONSULTANT shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If CONSULTANT performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations, CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom; E. CONSULTANT understands the nature and scope of the Work to be performed under this Agreement as well as any and all schedules of performance; F. All of CONSULTANT’s employees and agents possess sufficient skill, knowledge, training and experience to perform those services and tasks assigned to them by CONSULTANT; and
G. All of CONSULTANT’s employees and agents (including, but not limited to, subcontractors and subconsultants) possess all licenses, permits, certificates, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the tasks and services contemplated under this Agreement and all such licenses, permits, certificates, qualifications and approvals will be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement and made available to CITY for copying and inspection.

Such effort by CONSULTANT to correct any errors or omissions will be commenced 291 April 11, 2023
immediately upon their discovery by either Party and will be completed within seven (7) calendar days from the date of discovery or such other extended period of time authorized by the CITY Representative in writing and in her sole and absolute discretion. The Parties acknowledge and agree that CITY’s acceptance of any work performed by CONSULTANT or on CONSULTANT’s behalf will not constitute a release of any deficiency or delay in performance. The Parties further acknowledge, understand and agree that CITY has relied upon the foregoing representations of CONSULTANT, including but not limited to the representation that CONSULTANT possesses the skills, training, knowledge and experience necessary to perform the Work skillfully, competently and to the highest standards of CONSULTANT’s profession.

2.5 ASSIGNMENT: The skills, training, knowledge and experience of CONSULTANT are material to CITY’s willingness to enter into this Agreement. Accordingly, CITY has an interest in the qualifications and capabilities of the person(s) who will perform the services and tasks to be undertaken by CONSULTANT or on behalf of CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. In recognition of this interest, CONSULTANT agrees that it will not assign or transfer, either directly or indirectly or by operation of law, this Agreement or the performance of any of CONSULTANT’s duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the CITY, which shall not be unreasonably delayed or withheld. In the absence of CITY’s prior written consent, any attempted assignment or transfer will be ineffective, null and void and will constitute a material breach of this Agreement.

As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the CITY, or who are determined by the CITY to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the CONSULTANT at the request of the CITY. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: PAUL JUNKER, PLANNING SERVICES GROUP LEADER.

2.7 CONTROL AND PAYMENT OF SUBORDINATES; INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: The Work will be performed by CONSULTANT or under CONSULTANT’s strict supervision. CONSULTANT will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Work subject to the requirements of this Agreement. CITY retains CONSULTANT on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. CONSULTANT reserves the right to perform similar or different services for other principals during the term of this Agreement, provided such work does not unduly interfere with CONSULTANT’s competent and timely performance of the Work contemplated under this Agreement and provided the performance of such services does not result in the unauthorized disclosure of CITY’s confidential or proprietary information. Any additional personnel performing the Work under this Agreement on behalf of CONSULTANT are not employees of CITY and will at all times be under CONSULTANT’s exclusive direction and control. CONSULTANT will pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due to such personnel and will assume responsibility for all benefits, payroll taxes, Social Security and Medicare payments and the like. CONSULTANT will be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: Social Security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, workers’ compensation insurance and the like. 292 April 11, 2023

2.8 REMOVAL OF EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS: If any of CONSULTANT’s officers, employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors or subconsultants is determined by the CITY Representative to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely performance of the tasks assigned to CONSULTANT, a threat to persons or property, or if any of CONSULTANT’s officers, employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors or subconsultants fail or refuse to perform the Work in a manner acceptable to the CITY, such officer, employee, agent, contractor, subcontractor or subconsultant will be promptly removed by CONSULTANT and will not be reassigned to perform any of the Work.

2.11 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS: The Parties acknowledge, understand and agree that CONSULTANT and all persons retained or employed by CONSULTANT are, and will at all times remain, wholly independent contractors and are not officials, officers, employees, departments or subdivisions of CITY. CONSULTANT will be solely responsible for the negligent acts and/or omissions of its employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors and subconsultants.

III.

INSURANCE

Such CGL Coverage shall have minimum limits of no less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) in the general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, property damage, operations, products and completed operations, and contractual liability.

B. Automobile Liability Insurance: CONSULTANT will procure and maintain Automobile Liability Insurance as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering Automobile Liability, Code 1 (any auto). Such Automobile Liability Insurance will have 293 April 11, 2023
minimum limits of no less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

C. Workers’ Compensation Insurance/ Employer’s Liability Insurance: A policy of workers’ compensation insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which will indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for both CONSULTANT and CITY against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by CONSULTANT in the course of carrying out the Work contemplated in this Agreement.

3.3 REQUIRED CARRIER RATING: All varieties of insurance required under this Agreement will be procured from insurers admitted in the State of California and authorized to issue policies directly to California insureds. Except as otherwise provided elsewhere under this Article, all required insurance will be procured from insurers who, according to the latest edition of the Best’s Insurance Guide, have an A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII. CITY may also accept policies procured by insurance carriers with a Standard & Poor’s rating of no less than BBB according to the latest published edition the Standard & Poor’s rating guide. As to Workers’ Compensation Insurance/ Employer’s Liability Insurance, the CITY Representative is authorized to authorize lower ratings than those set forth in this Section.

3.4 PRIMACY OF CONSULTANT’S INSURANCE: Except with respect to workers compensation coverage, all policies of insurance provided by CONSULTANT will be primary to any coverage available to CITY or CITY’s elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers.

Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CITY or CITY’s elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers will be in excess of CONSULTANT’s insurance and will not contribute with it.

3.5 WAIVER OF SUBROGATION: All insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Agreement will not prohibit CONSULTANT or CONSULTANT’s officers, employees, agents, subcontractors or subconsultants from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. CONSULTANT hereby waives all rights of subrogation against CITY, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

3.6 VERIFICATION OF COVERAGE: CONSULTANT acknowledges, understands and agrees, that CITY’s ability to verify the procurement and maintenance of the insurance required under this Article is critical to safeguarding CITY’s financial well-being and, indirectly, the collective well-being of the residents of the CITY. Accordingly, CONSULTANT warrants, represents and agrees that it will furnish CITY with original certificates of insurance and endorsements evidencing the coverage required under this Article on forms satisfactory to CITY in its sole and absolute discretion. The certificates of insurance and endorsements for each insurance policy will be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, and will be on forms provided by the CITY if requested. All certificates of insurance and endorsements will be received and approved 294 April 11, 2023
by CITY as a condition precedent to CONSULTANT’s commencement of any Work. Upon CITY’s written request, CONSULTANT will also provide CITY with certified copies of all required insurance policies and endorsements.

3.7 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN COVERAGE: In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced immediately so as to avoid a lapse in the required coverage, CITY has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by CITY will be promptly reimbursed by CONSULTANT or CITY will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from CONSULTANT payments. In the alternative, CITY may cancel this Agreement effective upon notice.

3.8 SPECIAL RISKS OR CIRCUMSTANCES. CITY reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

IV.

INDEMNIFICATION

4.1 The Parties agree that CITY and CITY’s elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers (hereinafter, the “CITY Indemnitees”) should, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be protected from any and all third party loss, injury, damage, claim, lawsuit, cost, expense, attorneys’ fees, litigation costs, or any other cost to the extent arising out of or related to the negligent performance of this Agreement. Accordingly, the provisions of this indemnity provision are intended by the Parties to be interpreted and construed to provide the CITY Indemnitees with the fullest protection possible under the law. CONSULTANT acknowledges that CITY would not enter into this Agreement in the absence of CONSULTANT’s commitment to indemnify, defend and protect CITY as set forth herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent CONSULTANT’s services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to Claims to the extent that they arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT’s obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the CITY, its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers. CONSULTANT shall have the right to defend any action for which indemnification is sought under any part of this Article IV. Any person or entity seeking indemnification under this Article IV shall promptly report the matter to CONSULTANT such that defense of the matter is not compromised

4.2 To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the CITY Indemnitees from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys’ fees, expert fees and all other costs, and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with CONSULTANT’s negligent performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except such loss or damage which is caused by the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY.

4.3 CITY shall have the right to offset against the amount of any compensation due to CONSULTANT under this Agreement, any amount due to CITY from CONSULTANT as a result of CONSULTANT’s failure to either pay CITY promptly for any costs associated with CONSULTANT’s obligations to indemnify the CITY Indemnitees under this Article or related to CONSULTANT’s failure to either (i) pay taxes on amounts received pursuant to this Agreement or (ii) comply with applicable workers’ compensation laws.

4.4 The obligations of CONSULTANT under this Article will not be limited by the provisions of any 295 April 11, 2023
workers’ compensation act or similar act. CONSULTANT expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to CITY and CITY’s elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers.

4.8 Except as otherwise provided under Section 4.2 of this Article, above, to the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the CITY Indemnitees from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys’ fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature to the extent caused by CONSULTANT’s negligent performance under this Agreement, including but not limited to the negligent acts, errors or omissions of CONSULTANT or CONSULTANT’s officers, employees, agents, servants, contractors, subcontractors or subconsultants or the failure of the same to comply with any of the duties, obligations or standards of care set forth herein. The duty to indemnify, defend and hold harmless under this subsection shall not encompass a duty to indemnity, defend or hold harmless for liability, loss, suit, damage, expense, or cost caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of any or all of the CITY Indemnitees. The duty to indemnify, defend and hold harmless as set forth under this subsection is intended to encompass liabilities, losses, damages, expense and costs not otherwise subject to subsection 4.2, above.

4.9 As to the duties to indemnify under Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of this Article, above, CITY shall have the right to offset against the amount of any compensation due CONSULTANT under this Agreement any amount due CITY from CONSULTANT as a result of CONSULTANT’s failure to pay CITY promptly any indemnification arising under this Article and related to CONSULTANT’s failure to either (i) pay taxes on amounts received pursuant to this Agreement, or (ii) comply with applicable workers’ compensation laws.

4.10 As to the duties to indemnify under Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of this Article, above, the obligations of 296 April 11, 2023
CONSULTANT under this Article will not be limited by the provisions of any workers’ compensation act or similar act. CONSULTANT expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to CITY and CITY’s elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents and authorized volunteers.

4.11 As to the duties to indemnify under Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of this Article, above, CONSULTANT agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this Article from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. In the event CONSULTANT fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, CONSULTANT agrees to be fully responsible and indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY and CITY’s elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents and authorized volunteers from and against any and all claims and losses, costs or expenses for any damage due to death or injury to any person and injury to any property resulting from any alleged intentional, reckless, negligent, or otherwise wrongful acts, errors or omissions of CONSULTANT’s subcontractors or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. Such costs and expenses shall include reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred by counsel of CITY’s choice and selected from CONSULTANT's insurance carrier's panel counsel.

4.12 As to the duties to indemnify under Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of this Article, above, CITY does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may possess against CONSULTANT because of the acceptance by CITY, or the deposit with CITY, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. This hold harmless and indemnification provision shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense.

4.13 As to the duties to indemnify under Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of this Article, above, the duties to indemnify, defend and hold harmless as set forth under this Section, shall survive the early termination or normal expiration of this Agreement and shall be in addition to any other rights or remedies which the CITY may have at law or in equity.

TERMINATION

5.1 TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE: CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time for convenience and without cause by giving fifteen (15) calendar days written notice of CITY’s intent to terminate this Agreement which notice shall specify the effective date of such termination. Upon such termination for convenience, CONSULTANT will be compensated only for those services and tasks which have been performed by CONSULTANT up to the effective date of the termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause as provided under Section 5.2, below. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, CITY may require CONSULTANT to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data, as defined in Section 6.1 below, and other information of any kind prepared by CONSULTANT in connection with the performance of the Work. CONSULTANT will be required to provide such Documents and Data within fifteen (15) calendar days of CITY’s written request. No actual or asserted breach of this Agreement on the part of CITY pursuant to Section 5.2, below, will operate to prohibit or otherwise restrict CITY’s ability to terminate this Agreement for convenience as provided under this Section.

5.2 EVENTS OF DEFAULT; BREACH OF AGREEMENT:
297 April 11, 2023
A. In the event either Party fails to perform any duty, obligation, service or task set forth under this Agreement (or fails to timely perform or properly perform any such duty, obligation, service or task set forth under this Agreement), an event of default (hereinafter, “Event of Default”) will occur. For all Events of Default, the Party alleging an Event of Default will give written notice to the defaulting Party (hereinafter referred to as a “Default Notice”) which will specify: (i) the nature of the Event of Default; (ii) the action required to cure the Event of Default; (iii) a date by which the Event of Default will be cured, which will not be less than the applicable cure period set forth under Sections 5.2B and 5.2C below or if a cure is not reasonably possible within the applicable cure period, to begin such cure and diligently prosecute such cure to completion. The Event of Default will constitute a breach of this Agreement if the defaulting Party fails to cure the Event of Default within the applicable cure period or any extended cure period allowed under this Agreement.

B. CONSULTANT will cure the Event of Default within the following time periods:
i. Within ten (10) business days of CITY’s issuance of a Default Notice for any failure of CONSULTANT to timely provide CITY or CITY’s employees or agents with any information and/or written reports, documentation or work product which CONSULTANT is obligated to provide to CITY or CITY’s employees or agents under this Agreement.

Prior to the expiration of the 10-day cure period, CONSULTANT may submit a written request for additional time to cure the Event of Default upon a showing that CONSULTANT has commenced efforts to cure the Event of Default and that the Event of Default cannot be reasonably cured within the 10-day cure period. The foregoing notwithstanding, CITY will be under no obligation to grant additional time for the cure of an Event of Default under this Section 5.2B.i. that exceeds seven (7) calendar days from the end of the initial 10-day cure period; or
ii. Within fourteen (14) calendar days of CITY’s issuance of a Default Notice for any other Event of Default under this Agreement. Prior to the expiration of the 14-day cure period, CONSULTANT may submit a written request for additional time to cure the Event of Default upon a showing that CONSULTANT has commenced efforts to cure the Event of Default and that the Event of Default cannot be reasonably cured within the 14-day cure period. The foregoing notwithstanding, CITY will be under no obligation to grant additional time for the cure of an Event of Default under this Section 5.2B.ii that exceeds thirty (30) calendar days from the end of the initial 14-day cure period. In addition to any other failure on the part of CONSULTANT to perform any duty, obligation, service or task set forth under this Agreement (or the failure to timely perform or properly perform any such duty, obligation, service or task), an Event of Default on the part of CONSULTANT will include, but will not be limited to the following: (i) CONSULTANT’s refusal or failure to perform any of the services or tasks called for under the Scope of Work; (ii) CONSULTANT’s failure to fulfill or perform its obligations under this Agreement within the specified time or if no time is specified, within a reasonable time; (iii) CONSULTANT’s and/or its employees’ disregard or violation of any federal, state, local law, rule, procedure or regulation; (iv) the initiation of proceedings under any bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership, reorganization, or similar legislation as relates to CONSULTANT, whether voluntary of involuntary; (v) CONSULTANT’s refusal or failure to perform or observe any covenant, condition, obligation or provision of this Agreement; and/or (vii) CITY’s discovery that a statement representation or warranty by CONSULTANT relating to this Agreement is false, misleading or erroneous in any material respect.
298 April 11, 2023
C. CITY will cure any Event of Default asserted by CONSULTANT within forty-five (45) calendar days of CONSULTANT’s issuance of a Default Notice, unless the Event of Default cannot reasonably be cured within the 45-day cure period. Prior to the expiration of the 45-day cure period, CITY may submit a written request for additional time to cure the Event of Default upon a showing that CITY has commenced its efforts to cure the Event of Default and that the Event of Default cannot be reasonably cured within the 45-day cure period. The foregoing notwithstanding, an Event of Default dealing with CITY’s failure to timely pay any undisputed sums to CONSULTANT as provided under Section 1.5, above, will be cured by CITY within five (5) calendar days from the date of CONSULTANT’s Default Notice to CITY.

D. CITY, in its sole and absolute discretion, may also immediately suspend CONSULTANT’s performance under this Agreement pending CONSULTANT’s cure of any Event of Default by giving CONSULTANT written notice of CITY’s intent to suspend CONSULTANT’s performance (hereinafter, a “Suspension Notice”). CITY may issue the Suspension Notice at any time upon the occurrence of an Event of Default. Upon such suspension, CONSULTANT will be compensated only for those services and tasks which have been rendered by CONSULTANT to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY up to the effective date of the suspension. No actual or asserted breach of this Agreement on the part of CITY will operate to prohibit or otherwise restrict CITY’s ability to suspend this Agreement as provided herein.

E. No waiver of any Event of Default or breach under this Agreement will constitute a waiver of any other or subsequent Event of Default or breach. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party will give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.

F. The duties and obligations imposed under this Agreement and the rights and remedies available hereunder will be in addition to and not a limitation of any duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law. In addition to any other remedies available to CITY at law or under this Agreement in the event of any breach of this Agreement, CITY, in its sole and absolute discretion, may also pursue any one or more of the following remedies:
i. Upon written notice to CONSULTANT, the CITY may terminate this Agreement in whole or in part within fifteen (15) days notice;
ii. Upon written notice to CONSULTANT, the CITY may extend the time of performance; iii. The CITY may proceed by appropriate court action to enforce the terms of the Agreement to recover damages for CONSULTANT’s breach of the Agreement or to terminate the Agreement; or
iv. The CITY may exercise any other available and lawful right or remedy.

CONSULTANT will be liable for all legal fees plus other costs and expenses that CITY incurs upon a breach of this Agreement or in the CITY’s exercise of its remedies under this Agreement.

G. In the event CITY is in breach of this Agreement, CONSULTANT’s sole remedy will be the 299 April 11, 2023
suspension or termination of this Agreement and/or the recovery of any unpaid sums lawfully owed to CONSULTANT under this Agreement for completed services and tasks.

VI.

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

6.3 FALSE CLAIMS ACT: CONSULTANT warrants and represents that neither CONSULTANT nor any person who is an officer of, in a managing position with, or has an ownership interest in CONSULTANT has been determined by a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction to have violated the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C., Section 3789 et seq. and the California False Claims Act, Government Code Section 12650 et seq.
300 April 11, 2023

CONSULTANT: CITY:

Interwest Consultant Group, Inc.
1613 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 100
Roseville, CA 95661
Attn: Paul Junker
Phone: (916) 436-3017
City of California City
21000 Hacienda Blvd.

California City, CA 93505
Attn: Inge Elmes, Acting City Manager
Phone: (760) 373-8661
Such notices will be deemed effective when personally delivered or successfully transmitted by facsimile as evidenced by a fax confirmation slip or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit with the United States Postal Service, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the Party at its applicable address.

6.6 SUBCONTRACTING: CONSULTANT will not subcontract any portion of the Work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without the prior written approval of CITY.

Subcontracts (including without limitation subcontracts with subconsultants), if any, will contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement, including provisions relating to insurance requirements and indemnification.

6.7 CITY’S RIGHT TO EMPLOY OTHER CONSULTANTS: CITY reserves the right to employ other contractors in connection with the various projects worked upon by CONSULTANT.

6.9 TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

6.12 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: This Agreement will be binding on the successors and assigns of the Parties.

6.16 AMENDMENT; MODIFICATION: No amendment, modification or supplement of this Agreement will be valid or binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties, subject to CITY approval.

The requirement for written amendments, modifications or supplements cannot be waived and any attempted waiver will be void and invalid.

6.20 FORCE MAJEURE: The Completion Date shall be extended in the event of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control of CONSULTANT and without the fault or negligence of CONSULTANT, including but not limited to severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the CITY, if the CONSULTANT shall within three (3) calendar days of the commencement of such delay notify the City Representative in writing of the causes of the delay. The City Representative shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the 302 April 11, 2023
City Representative such delay is justified. The City Representative’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall CONSULTANT be entitled to recover damages against the CITY for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, CONSULTANT’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.

6.21 COUNTERPARTS: This Agreement will be executed in three (3) original counterparts each of which will be of equal force and effect. No handwritten or typewritten amendment, modification or supplement to any one counterpart will be valid or binding unless made to all three counterparts in conformity with Section 6.16, above. One fully executed original counterpart will be delivered to CONSULTANT and the remaining two original counterparts will be retained by CITY. (SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE)
303 April 11, 2023
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first appearing in this Agreement, above.

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY:

By:_______________________________
Name: Inge Elmes
Title: Acting City Manager
Date:_____________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:____________________________
Victor Ponto, City Attorney
INTERWEST CONSULTANT GROUP, INC.:

By:_______________________________
Name: Paul Meschino
Title: President of Operations
Date:_____________________
304 April 11, 2023
EXHIBIT “A”
Proposal of Planning Services
SCOPE OF SERVICES:
• Complete entitlement reviews, including Site Plan Reviews, Conditional Use Permits, Tentative Subdivision Maps, Rezones and General Plan Amendments.
• Coordinate entitlement reviews with affected City departments and outside agencies. • Provide support on environmental reviews, including but not limited to preparing minor CEQA reviews (exemptions and mitigated negative declarations), reviewing and commenting on applicant CEQA documents, responding to outside agency inquiries. • Represent the City on outside boards as assigned.
• Provide planning-related guidance to City staff and departments. • Amend City regulations as directed.
• Other planning related duties as assigned by the City Manager.

COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
Planning Manager .................................................................................................................... 185 Principal Planner....................................................................................................................... 170 Senior Planner.......................................................................................................................... 155 Associate Project Planner ........................................................................................................ 125 Assistant Planner ......................................................................................................................100 Planning Technician .................................................................................................................. 80 305 April 11, 2023

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 11, 2023
PREPARED BY: Kenny Cooper, Finance Manager
SUBJECT: Measure C and Measure A Financial Data

BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION
ITEM NO. CB 3.

During the April 3
rd Town Hall Meeting, Council asked staff to bring the financial data information on Measure C and Measure A for discussion. Staff has provided this data dating back to 2012 to present for your consideration.

FISCAL IMPACT
TBD

RECOMMENDATION
Discuss and give direction as needed.

ATTACHMENTS

SUMMARY MEASURE A

SUMMARY MEASURE C
BUDGET ANALYSIS FYl 8-19 THRU FY22-23

ITEM NO. NB 1.

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
APRIL 11, 2023
PREPARED BY: Inge Elmes, Acting City Manager

SUBJECT: Miscellaneous Employee Memorandum of Understanding Background Discussion:

On April 5, 2023, the Miscellaneous Employee Union members ratified a vote to approve the tentative MOU agreement, please see attachment. This has been a long process and staff is pleased to provide the tentative Memorandum of Understanding for your viewing.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends approving the agreement.

ATTACHMENT
A. Memorandum of Understanding
306 April 11, 2023

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

BETWEEN

THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY
AND

THE CALIFORNIA CITY

MISCELLANEOUS EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025
307 April 11, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE Page
I TERM .........................................................................................................................3 II RENEWAL .................................................................................................................3 III EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT ..........................................................3 IV UNION SECURITY ..................................................................................................4 V UNION REPRESENTATIVES .................................................................................4 VI MAINTENANCE OF BENEFITS .............................................................................4 VII SAVINGS PROVISIONS ..........................................................................................4 VIII CITY'S RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ..........................................................4 IX PEACEFUL PERFORMANCE CLAUSE ................................................................5 X DEFINITIONS ...........................................................................................................5 A. Wages
B. Forms of Salary Adjustment
C. Compensatory
D. Probationary Period
E. Promotion
XI WORK WEEK ............................................................................................................6 A. Regular Work Day
B. Regular Work Week
C. Overtime
D. Paid Leave
E. Break
F. Flex Scheduling
XII WAGES ......................................................................................................................6 A. Step-in-Grade
B. Merit Salary Adjustment
C. Longevity Pay
D. COLA
E. Promotional-Out-of-Classification Pay
F. Over-Time
G. Compensatory Time
H. CalPERS Contribution
XIII JOB VACANCIES .....................................................................................................8 XIV REJECTION FOLLOWING PROMOTION .............................................................9 XV EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE .................................................................................9 XVI IN-SERVICE TRAINING ........................................................................................10 XVII HOLIDAYS .............................................................................................................10 308 April 11, 2023
XVIII VACATION .............................................................................................................11 XIX SICK LEAVE ..........................................................................................................11 XX SICK LEAVE OF ABSENCE ..................................................................................12 XXI FAMILY DEATH LEAVE.......................................................................................12 XXII HEALTH, DENTAL, AND VISION BENEFITS ...................................................13 XXIII DISABILITY INSURANCE ...................................................................................13 XXIV UNIFORM ALLOWANCE .....................................................................................14 XXV COLLECTIVE RISK MANAGEMENT TEAM......................................................14 XXVI GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ..................................................................................14 XXVII CALIFORNIA DRIVERS LICENSE REQUIREMENT .........................................15 XXVIII EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM..............................................................15 XXIV DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE POLICY ............................................................15 XXV CONTINUED DISCUSSIONS ...............................................................................16 CERTIFICATIONS ..............................................................................................................17 Performance Appraisal Instructions ....................................................................... Attachment 309 April 11, 2023

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

BETWEEN

THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY
AND

CALIFORNIA CITY MISCELLANEOUS EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is entered into pursuant to the Meyers-MiliasBrown Act (Government Code Sections 3500- 3510) and is made and entered into the ___ day of April 2023 by and between the CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, hereinafter called the "City" and the CALIFORNIA CITY MISCELLANEOUS EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, hereinafter called the "Union".

ARTICLE I
TERM
The City and the Union agree that the term of this Memorandum of Understanding shall begin at midnight July 1, 2022, and end at 11:59 P.M. on June 30, 2025. This MOU specifically supersedes and replaces the prior MOU between the City and the Union, any and all extensions or addenda to the prior MOU, and any and all other understandings, oral or written, entered into between the City and the Union.

ARTICLE II

RENEWAL
The City and the Union agree that for the term of this Memorandum of Understanding, the parties, by mutual agreement, may reopen any article or provision of this contract at any time for the purpose of further discussion, modification and/or reconsideration. The parties agree to negotiate contract articles affected by new laws.

The City and the Union agree that meeting and conferring over the renewal or continuation of this MOU shall be initiated and conducted in such a manner that every effort will be made to reach an agreement prior to the expiration of this MOU. It is further agreed that nothing in this MOU shall in any way diminish the rights of the employees, the City, or the Union as established by the City Municipal Code, the personnel policies of the city, the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act of the State of California and all amendments thereto except as specifically provided by addenda attached hereto.

ARTICLE III

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT
The City and the Union agree that the provisions of this Memorandum of Understanding shall be applied equally to all employees covered herein without favor or discrimination because of race, creed color, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin, political, or religious affiliation or Union membership. No employee will be discriminated against and/or retaliated against for exercise of his/her rights granted by this MOU, City rules, or by Law. 310 April 11, 2023

ARTICLE IV

UNION SECURITY
The City agrees to a Union dues system whereby authorized deductions will be withheld and paid to the Union consistent with current Government Code regulations applying to the collection and payment of Union dues.

ARTICLE V

UNION REPRESENTATIVES
The City agrees that the Union shall be permitted to maintain a steward on the job to receive complaints and to see that the terms and conditions of this Memorandum of Understanding are being observed. The City also recognizes the right of Stewards to participate in labor management meetings with City Management including all steps of discussions on grievances, MOU negotiations, grievance meetings, PERB hearings, arbitration meetings, mediation meetings, appeals before City Council, disciplinary hearings, Skelly hearings, termination meetings, investigatory meetings, Weingarten meetings, and other union meetings with management. The Union shall notify the City Manager in writing of the names of the stewards upon appointment. The City agrees to allow Union Stewards eight (8) hours off each month to hold a Stewards meeting. The eight (8) hours allotted for the Stewards meeting will be shared among all Union Stewards. The Union agrees to notify the City of the names of Stewards and date and time of regularly scheduled monthly meetings. Any changes in meeting dates, times, or Stewards shall be given to the City immediately.

ARTICLE VI

MAINTENANCE OF BENEFITS
All present policies specifically relating to matters within the scope of representation as set forth in the personnel manual shall continue to be observed, except as modified by this Memorandum of Understanding or altered by the City after consultation with the Union or, failing a response to the offer of consultation, after a reasonable period of time thereafter.

ARTICLE VII

SAVINGS PROVISION
If any provisions of this Memorandum of Understanding are held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provisions will not be deemed valid and subsisting except to the extent permitted by law, but all other provisions will continue in full force and effect.

ARTICLE VIII

CITY'S RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The City retains, solely and exclusively, all the rights, powers and authority exercised or held prior to the execution of this Memorandum of Understanding. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the rights, powers, and authority retained solely and exclusively by the City and not abridged herein, included but are not limited to following: To manage and direct its business and personnel; to manage, control and determine the mission of its departments, building 311 April 11, 2023
facilities in whole or in part; to subcontract or discontinue work for economic or operational reasons; to direct the work force; to increase or decrease the work force and determine the number of employees needed, to hire, transfer, promote and maintain the discipline and efficiency of its employees; to establish work standards, schedule of operation and reasonable workload; to specify or assign work requirements, and require overtime; to schedule working hours and shifts; to adopt rules of conduct and penalties for violation thereof; to determine the type and scope of work to be performed and the services to be provided; to determine the methods, processes, means and places of providing services and to take whatever action necessary to prepare for and operate in an emergency.

ARTICLE IX

PEACEFUL PERFORMANCE CLAUSE
During the term of this Memorandum of Understanding, the City agrees that it will not lock out employees, and the Union agrees that it will not engage in, encourage, or approve any strike, slow-down or other work stoppage growing out of any dispute relating to the terms of this MOU.

The Union agrees to take whatever lawful steps are necessary to prevent any interruption of work in violation of this MOU, recognizing with the City that all matters of controversy within the scope of this MOU shall be settled by established grievance procedures. If there is a strike, slowdown or work stoppage, the employees who engage in such activity shall be subject to discipline up to and including discharge. The City may seek such remedies as are available under the law.

ARTICLE X

DEFINITIONS
A. Wages:

1. Regular rate -normal hourly rate

2. Straight overtime -overtime hours worked which are paid at the normal hourly rate. (Example -standby time).

3. Premium overtime -overtime hours worked which are paid at the time and one-half rate.

4. Holiday pay -hours worked on a holiday which are paid at the regular rate, plus the premium rate (except floating holidays, which will be paid at regular wage as specified in Article XVII).

B. Forms of Salary Adjustment:

1. Step-in-grade. Salary adjustments based on the step-increase pay scale of the City.

2. Merit. Salary adjustments based solely on performance exceeding expectations.

3. Bonus/incentive-Extraordinary circumstances controlled by incumbent

4. Bi-lingual stipend-Based on routine use of foreign language skills in general use within California City.

5. Longevity. Based solely on tenure.

6. COLA. Based solely on fiscal conditions as decided by City Council.

7. Promotional. Based solely on change in status.

8. Temporary out of class work

9. Out-of-Classification

10. Overtime-Based on work beyond standard workweek.
312 April 11, 2023

11. Call-Out — Minimum two (2) hours of overtime at time and a half.

12. Standby — three hours of compensation at straight time for the principal employee assigned to be on standby

13. Secondary Standby – two hours of compensation at straight time for employees assigned to be on secondary standby
C. Compensatory: Based on a time-for-time formula as determined by Fair Labor Standards Act unless otherwise negotiated.

D. Probationary period: A prescribed period of time under an original or promotional appointment where the employee's performance is observed to determine fitness for the work performed.

E. Promotion: The appointment of an employee to a position in a higher classification.

ARTICLE XI

WORK WEEK
A. Regular Work Day: The regular workday or shift shall consist of no more than eight (8) consecutive hours of work, exclusive of lunch, in any twenty-four (24) hour period.

B. Regular Work Week: A period of 168 consecutive hours (7 consecutive 24 —hour periods-mandated by Fair Labor Standards Act and is not negotiable) as determined by the City Manager.

C. Overtime: All authorized time worked in excess of forty (40) hours in one (1) work week.

D. Paid Leave: For the purpose of computing overtime all paid leave will be considered as time worked.

E. Break: Each employee shall be granted one fifteen (15)-minute break for each four (4) hours worked.

F. Flex Scheduling: With the approval of the City Manager, a flex work schedule may be implemented on a departmental basis. If a flex schedule is implemented, overtime shall be paid for hours worked in excess of the modified weekly schedule.

ARTICLE XII
WAGES
Wage adjustments shall be made as follow:

A. Step-in-grade: Effective at the time of this MOU, Step-in-grade salary adjustments will be implemented for steps one (1) through nine (9) in the official pay scale of the City, based upon receiving a "meets expectations" performance rating at the immediately preceding performance evaluation. Step 7 will be added July 1, 2022, rewarded retroactively, effective to July 1, 2022. All retroactive payments will be calculated to 313 April 11, 2023
include both regular wage and overtime adjustments in final payout. Thereafter, Step 8 will be added July 1, 2023, and step 9 will be added July 1, 2024.

B. Merit Salary Adjustment:

1. Bi-lingual Stipend: An employee who is routinely required to use a language in addition to English in the performance of regular job duties will receive a two percent (2%) stipend.

C. Longevity Pay: Employees shall receive longevity pay according to the following schedule:

1. 2% at the completion of 10 years continuous service

2. 2% at the completion of 15 years continuous service

3. 2% at the completion of 20 years continuous service

4. 2% at the completion of 25 years continuous service

5. 3% at the completion of 30 years of continuous service

6. 5% at the completion of 40 years of continuous service D. COLA (Cost of Living Adjustment):

1. The City shall provide a cost of living adjustment effective the pay period closest July 1, 2022 of 5% for the year 2022-2023, rewarded retroactively, effective to July 1, 2022. All retroactive payments will be calculated to include both regular wage and overtime adjustments in final payout.

2. The City shall provide a cost of living adjustment effective the pay period closest to July 1,2023 of 5% for the year 2023-2024.

3. The City shall provide a cost of living adjustment effective the pay period closest to July 1,2024 of 5% for the year 2024-2025.

E. Promotional-Out-of-Classification Pay: When an employee is required to perform work which is normally required of an employee in a higher classification or which is neither specified in the employee's job specification nor related to the duties which the employee normally performs, the employee shall be paid out-of-classification pay at the first step of the higher classification or 5% above the regular pay rate, whichever is greater. Rules outlining requirements for this are outlined in the Personnel Manual and will be followed accordingly.

F. Over-time: All authorized time worked in excess of forty (40) hours in one (1) work week based on FLSA law. When the need for overtime occurs, the City will seek to obtain volunteers for the performance of overtime work in order of seniority, with overtime being first offered to the most senior employee. Prior to each weekend, employees who want to volunteer for overtime will affix their name to the overtime log and will be called out based on seniority. If an employee is unable to be reached by telephone, the City will move to the next senior employee on the list.

In the event that there are an insufficient number of volunteers, the City shall have the right to assign such work on a non-volunteer basis beginning with the least senior of those employees who have had the least assigned overtime on a non-volunteer basis. 314 April 11, 2023
Secondary Standby for Water Department: All water department field employees may, with City approval, be placed on a rotational secondary standby list for situations where a second person is needed for a call out if the employee on primary standby is already occupied with a different call out. Two employees may be assigned to the secondary standby rotation at a time.

Employees on secondary standby will receive two hours of pay at their straight time hourly rate for each day that they are on standby. If called out to work, standby employees will be paid at the premium overtime rate for two hours of work or the actual number of hours worked, whichever is greater.

Employees on standby who are ill or who have a last-minute emergency that prevents them from responding to a call out must immediately notify the Chief Water Operator or designee by phone that they will be unavailable.

G. Compensatory Time: The City recognizes that compensatory time off is a legitimate means of payment. Employees may have the option of compensatory time off or paid overtime at the rate of time and one-half, with Department Head approval, according to designated City procedures. Employees may accrue up to 100 hours of compensatory time. Up to 50 hours of compensatory time can be cashed out upon the employees request in December of each year.

H. California Public Employees Retirement System ("CalPERS ") Contribution: All monies deposited by the employer on behalf of the employee belong solely to the employee should the employee leave CalPERS for any reason. Employees hired prior to July 1, 2014, will remain under the PERS contract for the 2% @ 50-3% @ 60, last highest year and optional sick leave credit.

Effective July 1, 2012, Employees hired prior to July 1, 2012 will contribute 8 % of the "Employee Contributions" to CalPERS.

The City will contract with CalPERS for a 2% @ 60, last highest year, and optional sick leave credit. All employees of the City beginning employment after July 1, 2012 shall pay the employee's eight percent (8%) contribution to CalPERS.

ARTICLE XIII

JOB VACANCIES
All City job vacancies shall be posted in conspicuous places for at least seven (7) calendar days.

However, the City need not post notice if any eligibility list is used to fill a vacancy, or if making a temporary appointment. The City will establish a promotional selection system for the purpose of allowing only qualified employees to compete for promotional vacancies. Further details are laid out in Personnel Manual.
315 April 11, 2023

ARTICLE XIV

REJECTION FOLLOWING PROMOTION
A. Any employee rejected during the probationary period following a promotional appointment, or at the conclusion of such probationary period by reason of failure of the appointing power to file a statement that the employee's services have been unsatisfactory, shall be reinstated to the classification from which the employee was promoted unless charges are filed, and the employee is discharged.

B. The satisfactory completion of six (6) months service constitutes the end of an employee's probationary period.

ARTICLE XV

EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE
The City recognizes the value of continuing education for its employees and provides the following:

A. Eligibility. Any regular full-time employee is eligible to request reimbursement for educational or training expenses as defined and provided for within this policy. All employees must satisfy the necessary perquisites for enrollment in a course to be eligible for reimbursement for the City. The courses should be courses that are job related, improve job or department, or related within the department for advancement.

B. Reimbursement. Applications for educational reimbursement must be obtained from and submitted to the City Manager. Each application must be approved by the appropriate Department head and the City Manager by April 1 of year planning to attend in order to budget for expense. The City shall reimburse an employee's tuition and shall pay one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of books required while attending school. Tuition reimbursement shall be eighty percent (80%) if the employee earns a grade of "C," ninety percent (90%) for a "B," and one hundred percent (100%) for an "A". Receipts are required for reimbursement.

C. Limitations. Reimbursement to employees for tuition and books will be made only upon successful completion of the course or program and only provided the educational experience was undertaken at an approved or accredited agency or institution.

Reimbursement is limited to $1000 per employee per year based upon Department Head and City Manager approval.

To qualify for reimbursement, the City Manager or his/her designee shall have (upon recommendation by the Department Head) previously approved the subject matter of the courses and the agency or institution which provides the courses. This is limited to Community College, State College or Certificate programs based on Department Head recommendation and approval.

The applicant must not be receiving tuition payments or refunds for fees from other sources when requesting the same from the City, unless it is a specified amount which does not cover tuition, whereby the City may make up the difference for full tuition. 316 April 11, 2023
D. Documentation. Upon completion of the course with a passing grade or if no grade is given, proof that he/she has satisfactorily completed the course must be presented. Failure to attain a passing grade or satisfactory completion will result in denial of the employee's request for reimbursement for any educational claim for reimbursement.

Receipts showing tuition and fee payments, and payments for text materials must be furnished with the reimbursement request to the Department Head and forwarded to the City Manager for approval.

ARTICLE XVI

IN-SERVICE TRAINING
The City will provide in-service training for employees prior to their operation of equipment.

ARTICLE XVII

HOLIDAYS
A. Employees shall receive thirteen (14) paid holidays without deductions from the employees leave based on their assigned schedule:

1. New Year's Day,

2. Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday (floating*),

3. President's Day

4. Cesar Chavez Day (floating*)

5. Memorial Day,

6. Juneteenth,

7. Independence Day,

8. Labor Day

9. Columbus Day (floating*)

10. Veteran's Day

11. Thanksgiving Day,

12. The Friday following Thanksgiving

13. Christmas Eve Day in lieu of Lincoln's Birthday (or day after Christmas if designated by City Manager),

14. Christmas Day
Every day appointed by the President or Governor and approved by the City Council for a public fast, thanksgiving, or holiday. *Martin Luther King's Birthday, Cesar Chavez Day and Columbus Day will be offered as floating holidays. City services will remain open and scheduling will be done to accommodate employees and City services (by Department Head). If the employee chooses to work the holiday, they must select another day off (during fiscal year of holiday) in lieu of the holiday. Employees shall advise the city 3 days prior to a floating holiday of an intention to take the floating holiday off, otherwise, City will expect that the employee will report to work that day. The City shall conspicuously post at each work location advertisement of such requirement in advance of each floating holiday. The holiday and day off Holidays will be paid at regular time. If all employees decide to have the holiday off, City services will remain open with limited 317 April 11, 2023
services that Department Heads can offer. Employee must submit leave requests for recording of holiday time off.

B. Should a designated holiday fall on a Saturday, the Friday preceding the holiday shall be observed as a City holiday. Should a designated holiday fall on a Sunday, the Monday following the designated holiday shall be a holiday observed by the City.

C. An employee shall receive holiday pay when a holiday is worked.

D. Holiday and Floating Holiday accruals will be set to match the hours of an employee’s regular shift.

ARTICLE XVIII

VACATION
Employees shall accrue vacation according to the following schedule:

A. One (1) to three (3) years, accumulate ten (10) hours per month B. Four (4) to ten (10) years, accumulate fifteen (15) hours per month C. Over ten (10) years, accumulate twenty (20) hours per month At the beginning of each calendar year, the City shall provide employees with an opportunity to reserve vacation days during that calendar year. Such vacation reservations shall be made in order of seniority in each department, with the City reserving the right to limit the number of employees who may reserve vacation in any given day based on its operational needs.

Reservation requests shall be made by January 31st. Once an employee has made two reservations, that employee shall move to the bottom of the list, allowing the next senior employee to make two reservations, and so forth. As single reservation shall not consist of more than 5 consecutive work days.

This reservation process shall not preclude employees from making subsequent requests to use accrued vacation. The City shall grant such subsequent requests on a first come first serve basis provided (1) it receives reasonable notice and (2) it can still meet its operational needs.

Vacation may be accumulated as follows:

VACATION CAP: The City caps the vacation leave accrual rate at 200 hours per year. The City will reimburse any hours over the cap at the end of the fiscal year.

ARTICLE XIX

SICK LEAVE
A. Employees shall accrue sick leave according to the following schedule:

1. One (1) to three (3) years, accumulate ten (10) hours per month

2. Four (4) to ten (10) years, accumulate fifteen (15) hours per month

3. Over ten (10) years, accumulate twenty (20) hours per month B. As of July 1, 2012, those employees with ten (10) years or more of City of California service may cash out their sick leave at seventy-five percent (75%) upon retirement from the City. Employees who have less than ten years of employment may cash out their sick 318 April 11, 2023
leave at 50%. Employees will have the option to purchase PERS retirement credits with unused sick leave.

C. Sick Leave Cap: The City caps the sick leave accrual rate at 300 hours per year. The City will reimburse any hours over the cap at the end of the fiscal year at a rate of 75% D. Catastrophic Leave Bank. Employees shall have the option of cashing out sick leave at the end of the year or banking leave to a secondary catastrophic leave bank. This secondary leave bank may be used for a major illness or injuries. The catastrophic leave bank may build up to 200 hours into a bank that and will not be eligible to be cashed out.

An employee with a buildup of catastrophic leave hours has the option of donating those hours to one or more of their co-workers. Employees using catastrophic leave shall not be required to exhaust other sick leave.

As used here, "catastrophic illness" shall mean an illness or injury of an employee or of the employee's family, as defined in Govt. Code Section 12945.2 (c) 8: "Serious health condition" means an illness, injury, impairment, or physical or mental condition that involves either of the following:

1. Inpatient care in a hospital, hospice, or residential health care facility.

2. Continuing treatment or continuing supervision by a health care provider.

Eligibility for use of such leave shall be contingent upon presentation by the employee of written confirmation from the relevant health care provider of the need for such leave and the estimated duration of such leave.

ARTICLE XX

SICK LEAVE OF ABSENCE
If an employee is granted a sick leave of absence without pay, the City shall pay the employee only cost of medical insurance premiums for the first three (3) months only.

ARTICLE XXI

FAMILY DEATH LEAVE
The City shall authorize family death leave with pay for a regular employee, when needed, due to the death of the employee's immediately family as defined in Personnel Manual: Employee's spouse (including domestic partner), parents (including step-parents), children (including step children, foster children, and domestic partner's children), sisters, brothers, grandparents, grandchildren, mother-in-law, and father-in-law. Other exceptions may apply.

A. The employee shall give notice to the immediate supervisor in advance of taking such leave.

B. Such absence will be limited to the time actually required and shall not exceed three (3) workdays for any (1) death.
319 April 11, 2023
C. An employee may be granted up to 5 days bereavement leave if the employee is the primary coordinator of services required by the deceased or if more than 300 miles of one-way travel is required to attend to the death of a loved one.

ARTICLE XXII

HEALTH, DENTAL, AND VISION BENEFITS
A. Effective with the execution of this MOU the City and Union agree that a Collective Health, Dental, and Vision (HDVB) bargaining unit will be established to advise the City on all issues HDVB issues relating to cost and levels of coverage an negotiate the relative contribution levels between the employees and the City. The Collective HDVB bargaining will be made up one (1) representative from the CC Miscellaneous Employees Union, the CC Firefighters Association, the CC Police Officers Association and the City.

At least annually prior to the development of the City's annual budget the HDVB Unit will meet to assess the current cost of HDVB coverage available to the City, study viable alternatives, develop a proposal for the distribution of the cost of HDVB between the City and the Employees that is mutually agreeable between the HDVB Unit and the City.

B. For the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025 the City shall pay employees for HDVB benefits coverage monthly:

1. Employee - $950

2. Employee with 1 dependent - $1,050

3. Employee with 2 or more dependents - $1,500
All future payments by City to employees for HDVB benefits shall be agreed to by the City and the HDVB Collective Bargaining Unit by sperate joint MOU.

C. Employee who provide proof of comparable HDVB benefits being provided by another policy of coverage may elect to direct the cash equivalent of the HDVB Benefits as additional income or deposited to an available City sponsored deferred compensation.

Those employees who are covered as a dependent if another City employee's HDVB benefits are eligible to receive the equivalent cost of the City HDVB benefits cash noted above. Those selecting the cash payment shall be responsible for the taxes on such payment.

ARTICLE XXIII

DISABILITY INSURANCE
The City will continue to provide a disability program. The City will integrate disability benefits with the employee's sick leave accrual balance at the employee's option. The integrated plan will be at the employee's option. Employees shall sign forms as to their preference at the time of each illness. At no time shall the employee receive more than the employee received while on regular status.
320 April 11, 2023

ARTICLE XXIV

UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
The City will provide up to five (5) uniform work shirts (t-shirt alternative), a heavy jacket, and two (2) pair of safety shoes or boots (City specification) for employees who are required to wear them. Replacement of the specified items will be upon authorization and approval of the appropriate department head. The amount of $400 is granted for "Boot Allowance". Payment shall be made in July and January of each year. The employee's supervisor or the department Director may at any time require and employee receiving the Boot Allowance to replace their boots immediately if the boots are found to be unsafe and/or not meeting the pertinent OSHA safety footwear standards at the employees' expense.

The City will implement a uniform pants service for field employees that will provide uniform pants and allow for weekly drop-off and pick-up of uniform pants.

ARTICLE XXV

COLLECTIVE RISK MANAGEMENT TEAM
The Collective Risk Management Team shall be comprised of no less than five (5) members; one (1) member from the Personnel Department, one (1) from Fire Department, and one (1) from Police Department, one (1) Miscellaneous Union member, and one (1) alternate. The Risk Management Team shall meet at least once each quarter to discuss any previous accidents and/or injuries and ways to resolve such in the future. The Team will also be in charge of investigating acts of wrongdoing reported to the ERMA hotline (per PARSAC regulations). The Personnel Department shall furnish copies of all reports to Risk Management Team for discussion. This may or may not be in addition to a Safety Committee.

ARTICLE XXVI

GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
The City and Union agree that the grievance procedure may be modified to skip a particular person if the city official at that step is the source of the grievance. In the case of the grievance being a member of the governing body that city official will be excused from deliberations on the grievance, however, may testify before the remaining council.

The City agrees to establish appeals procedure for Minor Discipline (any disciplinary procedure action from letters of reprimand up to three-day suspension) where an employee can appeal one level of supervision up from the one imposing the discipline. These procedures will include requirements of the employee to prove that the discipline is not consistent with the actions in question. The full procedures will be outlined in the Personnel Manual and will be applicable to all City employees. This will be done no later than December 31, 2005 with the cooperation of the Unions.

At the request of either the City or the Union, the State Conciliation Service will be utilized in an advisory capacity with regard to any grievance that arises out of this Memorandum of Understanding. This service would be utilized if the Union and City Manager cannot reach an agreeable solution to a grievance.
321 April 11, 2023

ARTICLE XXVII

CALIFORNIA DRIVERS LICENSE REQUIREMENT
Every employee must have an appropriate valid California driver's license and be insurable at standard rates, if the employee's job requires driving City or personal vehicles on City business.

ARTICLE XXVIII

EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
The City has established an employee assistance program that offers 24/7 counseling, nursing, legal, and financial assistance for employees. The City pays this benefit in full for all full-time employees.

ARTICLE XXIV

DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE POLICY
While it is not the City's intent to infringe upon the private lives of its employees, it has the responsibility to provide a safe and hazard free work environment. Therefore, all employees are expected to arrive at work fit for duty, and to remain so for the remainder of the work period.

No employee may enter City premises while under the influence of, or have in his or her possession, any intoxicating beverage or behavior-altering drug of any kind. Likewise, the use, sale, transfer or possession of alcohol, behavior-altering drugs or substances of any kind, illegal drugs, or controlled substances on the job, on City property, in City vehicles, or in personal vehicles while on City business is prohibited. (Employees using medication prescribed by a licensed physician may be required to provide proof that such medication is safe to take while the employee is on duty. The City will have sole discretion as to whether or not it will be safe for those employees to remain on duty.)
Employees are forbidden to consume alcohol beverages, behavior-altering drugs or substances of any kind, or illegal drugs during work time, break times or meal periods, nor may they return to work after such breaks or meal periods under the influence of such substances.

The City reserves the right to require and conduct drug and alcohol tests whenever reasonable cause exists that an employee is under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

Employees who voluntarily come forward to the City prior to a situation requiring testing based upon reasonable suspicion and who cooperate with the City with regard to treatment may not be subject to discipline. An employee who requests a leave of absence to enter a drug or alcohol rehabilitation program will be reasonably accommodated with an unpaid leave of absence to enroll in such a program if such an accommodation is not an undue hardship on the City.

Employees voluntarily entering a drug or alcohol rehabilitation program may be required to provide medical validation of satisfactory completion of the program. Employees returning to work following satisfactory completion of a rehabilitation program may be subject to drug or alcohol tests without prior notice for up to one (1) year following the return date. A recurrence of a positive drug or alcohol test following return to work may lead to disciplinary action up to and including termination.
322 April 11, 2023
Failure to comply with these work rules may lead to disciplinary procedures up to and including termination.

ARTICLE XXV

CONTINUED DISCUSSIONS
The City and the Association agree to make a good faith effort to continue bargaining over the following items within a reasonable amount of time from the commencement of this MOU:

1. Discussion of language for certificate pay. Agreement has been reached on providing 2.5%. Language by the City is still needed.

2. Discussion of a rotational schedule for City Hall employees with initial shift assignments based on seniority.

3. Incentives for college education and certificates comparable to provisions in the MOU’s with other groups with the City.
323 April 11, 2023

CERTIFICATIONS
This MOU is adopted by City Council of the City of California City as of April 11, 2023.

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY
Inge Elmes, Acting City Manager
Date

CALIFORNIA CITY

MISCELLANEOUS EMPLOYEES

ASSOCIATION
Signature
Name/Title
Date
324 April 11, 2023
Performance Appraisal
Instructions
Performance Appraisal for non-management employees is done a minimum of once a year for all full-time, permanent employees. The appraisals are to be discussed with the employee privately in a face-to-face discussion. The attached performance appraisal document is used to summarize and record the discussions that are held between supervisor and employee for the period covered by the review. As part of the process of continuous feedback, performance ratings should never be a surprise to an employee, and each employee must be given a copy of his/her review. City reserves the right modify or eliminate the current performance appraisal form from time-to-time and will advise the Union.

Performance reviews can be given for a variety of reasons. Annual reviews are the most common, but performance evaluations can be given during probationary periods, after lengthy special projects, or as part of a performance improvement process. Regardless of the reason for a review, supervisors should ensure that the ratings are applied consistently and related to job performance.

Supervisors should rate the employee for each criterion, providing comments about specific behaviors and examples of incidents, which support the rating. City expects the employees to perform the duties of their jobs consistent with their job descriptions and in cooperation with their supervisors and City Management. While it is possible for an employee to exceed these expectations on occasion, it is recognized that if all employees performed their work at the levels identified in their job descriptions and consistent with the practices of their particular work group the Employees and the City would serve the Citizens well. Consequently, those employees rated as meeting expectations shall be moved into the available steps increase for their classification annually. The employee's performance shall be described in the following manner:

California City City CouncilApril 11, 2023

California City City Council
April 11, 2023