AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING: The following items were added to the City Council agenda after publishing and posting, but less than 24 hours before the special meeting. Socorro Chavez, City Clerk
ADDENDUM
CITY OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL/HOUSING AUTHORITY/SUCCESSOR AGENCY
Tuesday, February 13, 2024
REGULAR MEETING @ 5:00 PM
The following items were included in the agenda; however, the accompanying documentation was not published simultaneously. Please see the addendum for documentation.
NEW BUSINESS
NB 1. Appointment of Planning Commissioner – by Councilmember, Creighton Recommendation
The City ordinance states: “The Mayor shall appoint qualified persons to fill each vacancy with the advice and consent of the Council.”
We are recommending to the Council and Mayor the following appointments to the Planning Commission:
➢ David Brottlund
NB 1A. Take Oath of Office
Planning Commissioner David Brottlund
NB 2. Memorandum of Understanding with the California State Office of the Attorney General (OAG) to develop a Cannabis Administrative Prosecutor Program (CAPP) – by City Attorney, Victor Ponto
Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council approve a Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the OAG to develop a CAPP.
1 - 17 February 13, 2024
ITEM NO. NB 1.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
February 13, 2024
PREPARED BY: Jim Creighton, Councilmember
SUBJECT: Appointment of Planning Commissioner
BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION
According to the City Municipal Code, both the Planning Commission consists of five members, each serving a two-year term from May 1st to April 30th.
The application period for individuals to be considered for the vacant seat on the Planning Commission closed on 15 January 2024. The City Clerk received two letters of intent from interested candidates for the Planning Commission. Councilmember Kulikoff and I took the responsibility of reviewing all the applications and conducting interviews with the potential candidates.
FISCAL IMPACT
A monthly stipend of $50 per meeting per month, which has already been budgeted for the Planning Commission. In addition, Mandatory state training will have to be attended and paid for, by the City for the new commissioners.
COUNCIL OPTIONS
None
RECOMMENDATION
The City ordinance states: “The Mayor shall appoint qualified persons to fill each vacancy with the advice and consent of the Council.”
We are recommending to the Council and Mayor the following appointments to the Planning Commission:
• David Brottlund
ATTACHMENTS
None
2 - 17 February 13, 2024
ITEM NO. NB 2.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
February 13, 2024
PREPARED BY: Victor Ponto, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding with the California State Office of the Attorney General (OAG) to develop a Cannabis Administrative Prosecutor Program (CAPP)
BACKGROUND
The City received a presentation from the California State Office of the Attorney General (OAG) on its Cannabis Administrative Prosecutor Program (CAPP) at its December 12, 2023 meeting. The City Council directed the City Attorney’s Office to work with the OAG to develop a Memorandum of Understanding to enact the CAPP.
The purpose of the CAPP is to reduce and eliminate illegal commercial cannabis operations within the City. The CAPP aims to authorize the OAG to act on behalf of the City in an attempt to increase levels of cannabis enforcement, shift the costs of enforcement onto those who profit from illegal cannabis activity, institute cost-effective and sustainable enforcement programs, and support the legal cannabis industry.
DISCUSSION
The City of Fresno was the first city to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with the OAG.
Under the proposed terms of the Memorandum of Understanding, the OAG will help the City pursue enforcement actions against illegal cannabis operators. City staff and the OAG will work together as part of a seven-part process:
1. Investigation/Conflict check;
2. Post and Serve Notice of Violation, Citation, and Order to Show Cause;
3. Voluntary Abatement and Stipulated Administrative Order; 3 - 17 February 13, 2024
4. Due Process Hearing;
5. Abatement Warrant;
6. Seizure of Tangible Property; and
7. Costs of Enforcement Tallied and Recorded as a Property Tax Lien.
Illegal cannabis operators will have an opportunity to voluntarily abate their illegal activity. If they fail to do so, a due process hearing is held before an administrative hearing officer or hearing board. The hearing may result in the issuance of an abatement warrant, which will authorize the City to eradicate unlicensed commercial cannabis cultivation or to stop unlicensed retail or manufacturing activity, as well as an order authorizing the recovery of enforcement costs.
Money recovered by the City under the CAPP will be maintained in a Cannabis Cost Recovery Fund. Money from the Cannabis Cost Recovery Fund can only be used to reimburse the City for its enforcement costs against illegal cannabis operators while the Memorandum of Understanding is still active. Once the Memorandum of Understanding has been terminated, the funds can be used for any purpose.
The OAG will use its own prosecutors to bring enforcement actions against illegal cannabis operators. These prosecutors will control how the cases are handled and decide which cases to take on and which to dismiss and settle. City employees will not be under the supervision or management of OAG prosecutors, but will work with OAG prosecutors collaboratively. The OAG will produce a yearly report for the City Council on how the CAPP is going.
The term of the Memorandum of Understanding is for two years and can be renewed in one-year increments afterwards. Both the City and the OAG may withdraw from the MOU at any time if they notify the other party.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no estimated fiscal impact to entering into a Memorandum of Understanding with the OAG to develop the CAPP.
Under the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding, the OAG will seek to recover the cost of bringing enforcement actions against illegal cannabis operators, which will be recorded as a property tax lien. The OAG and the City will be reimbursed for their costs in a proportionate share. The City will not receive its share of the cost recovery fees before the OAG, but at the same time.
To receive reimbursement, the City will have to document its administrative costs. To do so, City staff must complete a memorandum of costs, which identifies the assessor parcel number associated with each case, the identity and hourly rate of City staff that worked on each case, and a description of the tasks undertaken to achieve the abatement of the nuisance.
4 - 17 February 13, 2024
The OAG estimates that there will be startup costs associated with the City developing the procedures and documents required for administrative enforcement actions. These startup costs may be offset by reduced impacts to the General Fund from the City’s code enforcement efforts as the City will be reimbursed for its code enforcement costs under the CAPP, effectively making noncompliant operators—rather than the City— bear the burden of the City’s code enforcement efforts.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council approve a Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the OAG to develop a CAPP.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Memorandum of Understanding Between City of California City and Office of the Attorney General for Cannabis Administrative Prosecutor Program
2. Cannabis Administrative Prosecutor Program (CAPP) Presentation
3. CAPP FAQ’S
5 - 17 February 13, 2024
CANNABIS ADMINISTRATIVE PROSECUTOR PROGRAM
(CAPP)
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
[February 13, 2024]
6 - 17 February 13, 2024
Table of Contents
I. Purpose
II. Parties
III. Goals and Objectives
IV. Management and Supervision of the CAPP
V. Overview of Enforcement Process and Roles of the Parties VI. Annual Report
VII. Facilities, Equipment and Property
VIII. Administrative Fines and Cannabis Cost Recovery Fund IX. Asset Forfeiture
X. Term of Agreement
XI. Compensation
XII. Instructions for Reimbursement
XIII. Cost Recovery
XIV. Liability, Indemnification, and Responsibility
XV. Press Policy
XVI. Signatures
7 - 17 February 13, 2024
Cannabis Administrative Prosecutor Program
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is made and entered into this____ day of _____________, 2024, by and between the City of California City (City) and the Office of the Attorney General (OAG), a department of the State of California. The City and the OAG are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties,” and individually as a “Party.” This MOU is made by the Parties with reference to the following Recitals:
A. On August 28, 2018, the City adopted ordinances No. 18-765 and 18-766, codified as California City Municipal Code Title 5 Chapter 6 (Regulation of Cannabis Related Businesses and Activity) and Title 9, Article 29 (Cannabis Businesses and Dispensaries) et. seq. (the “Ordinances”), attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. The Ordinances govern administrative enforcement against illegal commercial cannabis activity within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City.
B. The Ordinances authorize the City to enforce the standards set forth therein California City Municipal Code Title 5 Chapter 6 (Regulation of Cannabis Related Businesses and Activity) and Title 9, Article 29 (Cannabis Businesses and Dispensaries) et. seq. Pursuant to the Ordinances, the City has the authority to enforce the California City Municipal Code, including any employee or person under contract with the City Attorney appointed to investigate and/or prosecute violations of the California City Municipal Code.
I. PURPOSE
The Parties share the common goals to reduce and eliminate illegal commercial cannabis activity within the City and to mitigate the environmental, social, and economic impacts of these illegal activities. These common goals can be served by entering into an agreement that will integrate the resources of the OAG with the powers that the City has to undertake speedy and efficient enforcement actions against illegal land uses that constitute public nuisances.
The purpose of this MOU is to set forth the responsibilities of the Parties, as they relate to the Cannabis Administrative Prosecutor Program (CAPP). Working in conjunction with one another, the Parties will endeavor to effectively enforce the laws of the State of California including the Government Code, Business and Professions Code, Health and Safety Code, and applicable local ordinances related to illegal commercial cannabis activity. Use of the CAPP is intended to ensure well-rounded and coordinated administrative and civil enforcement efforts. The Parties share the same purpose of reducing illegal commercial cannabis activity in their respective areas of responsibility by providing a highly trained and specialized enforcement team. 8 - 17 February 13, 2024
II. PARTIES
A. OAG - The CAPP will be operated by the Cannabis Control Section of the OAG.
The OAG shall establish policies and procedures for the operation of the CAPP, provide direction and oversight to the CAPP, and ensure cooperation by and between the Parties.
B. City - The City, in accordance with the provisions of this agreement authorizes the OAG to work on behalf of the City for the purpose of utilizing the City’s administrative enforcement procedures to reduce and eliminate illegal commercial cannabis activities. The City makes a commitment to provide necessary personnel to implement the CAPP during the period that this MOU is in effect.
III. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The CAPP will promote and implement coordinated efforts towards taking administrative enforcement action against illegal commercial cannabis activity. The CAPP will encourage full cooperation between local and state code compliance, enforcement, and prosecutorial agencies to do the following:
A. Authorize OAG staff to act through and on behalf of the City. The City in executing this agreement authorizes OAG staff assigned to implement the CAPP to act on behalf of the City for the limited purpose of managing enforcement actions against illegal cannabis operators and prosecuting such cases before the City administrative hearing body.
B. Duty to Cooperate with OAG and the CAPP. City understands that it is conducting enforcement activities authorized by a City Ordinance and that the CAPP is ultimately responsible to oversee any appeals hearing and/or abatement. Therefore, City enforcement staff shall cooperate with the CAPP in its enforcement efforts. Such cooperation includes but is not limited to:
1. Consistent use of any template documents agreed upon by the Parties (e.g., notices of violation, orders to abate, orders to show cause, proposed orders, voluntary settlement agreements, abatement warrants, and documents for recording abatement liens);
2. Making City personnel available to testify at appeals hearings, administrative citation hearings, lien hearings, and/or to obtain inspection/abatement warrants;
3. Providing copies of case records to OAG staff upon request;
4. Preparing and executing necessary documents, such as warrant affidavits, upon request by OAG staff; and
9 - 17 February 13, 2024
5. Collecting and providing parcel specific information regarding properties upon which suspected illegal commercial cannabis activity is occurring. This includes, but is not limited to, information about the status of building permits, well permits, grading permits, any other required City permits, GIS data, and any other information that would be useful in determining whether activities and conditions on a given parcel constitute violations of local and state law applicable to illegal cannabis activity.
Failure to timely cooperate with OAG staff may result in discontinuation of enforcement proceedings and/or may preclude the OAG from pursuing costs incurred through the use of the City’s administrative enforcement procedures.
IV. MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION OF THE CAPP
A. Management
The management and supervision of the CAPP operations and resources subject to the control of the OAG will be the responsibility of the Senior Assistant Attorney General (SAAG) and a Supervising Deputy Attorney General (SDAG) of the Cannabis Control Section of the OAG. In addition to operational responsibility, the SAAG, SDAG, or a designee, will act as liaisons between the OAG and the City, and other federal, state, and local agencies, and prosecutors. Although not intended as an exclusive list of duties, the SAAG and SDAG shall be responsible for the following in connection with CAPP:
1. Supervise and direct all OAG personnel assigned to implement the CAPP.
2. Coordinate requests for assistance from the City for the CAPP.
B. CAPP Prosecutors
1. Deputy Attorneys General (DAGs) will be assigned as prosecutors to the CAPP and will be supervised by the SAAG and SDAG. The City may not direct, supervise, or manage, the work of the DAG.
2. DAGs shall have the following authority, in accordance with the expectations, policies, and procedures of the OAG and the City’s Code Compliance Enforcement Division, in prosecuting administrative enforcement actions against illegal commercial cannabis operations:
a. The discretion to determine whether an identified illegal commercial cannabis operation shall be the subject of an administrative citation pursuant to this MOU;
b. The discretion to negotiate voluntary settlement agreements, reduce fines, and enter into stipulations on behalf of the City for entry of 10 - 17 February 13, 2024
administrative orders to be submitted to the City Council; c. The discretion to voluntarily dismiss a case, where in the opinion of the assigned DAG, there is a lack of evidence or no reasonable cause to continue with the case;
d. The discretion to request, on behalf of the City, that unpaid costs of enforcement be specially assessed against a parcel that is the subject of an enforcement action in accordance with Government Code Sections 38773.1 and 38773.5 and applicable local law;
3. OAG DAGs assigned to implement the CAPP will comply with OAG protocols for parallel proceedings and ensure that administrative enforcement actions undertaken through the CAPP do not interrupt criminal investigations and do not interfere with investigations or planned criminal enforcement actions by the City or any other public agency. OAG staff will refrain from initiating enforcement actions against any particular parcel, owner, and/or occupant, at the request of the City’s Police Department or other local law enforcement.
C. City Regulatory Enforcement Staff
1. Notwithstanding the Duty to Cooperate set forth in section III.B., above, City employees assigned to implement the CAPP will not be subject to the direction, supervision, or management of the OAG.
2. Designated City departments and staff will work with OAG staff assigned to implement the CAPP to determine what code violations exist at illegal commercial cannabis sites, what actions are required for complete abatement of the identified code violations, and what other matters must be addressed to bring cited sites into compliance with local and state laws that are administered by City departments.
3. Where City staff incurs costs associated with the abatement of code violations which exist at illegal commercial cannabis sites, City staff will log and tally those costs for the purpose of cost recovery in accordance with section XIII, below.
D. Local City Police Department (PD)
1. The OAG and City staff working under the CAPP on proposed administrative enforcement actions will inquire with the PD to ensure that administrative enforcement actions do not interfere with existing criminal investigations or planned criminal enforcement actions. Where informed of possible interference with criminal enforcement activity, OAG and City staff will not initiate enforcement actions against any particular parcel, owner, and/or occupant.
11 - 17 February 13, 2024
2. Where the PD incurs costs, including administrative costs in causing the abatement of unlawful cannabis activity pursuant to a nuisance abatement order, the PD may be entitled to recovery of such costs. PD staff shall log and tally those costs for the purpose of cost recovery in accordance with section XIII, below.
3. This section shall apply even if the City contracts out its law enforcement to the Kern County Sheriff's Office.
V. OVERVIEW OF ENFORCEMENT PROCESS AND ROLES OF THE PARTIES Nothing in this agreement shall limit the authority of the City to engage in enforcement actions to ensure compliance with local laws through any means available under state and local law. However, enforcement actions undertaken through the CAPP on behalf of the City utilizing OAG staff and resources will generally occur as follows:
A. Investigation. A property upon which illegal commercial cannabis activity is occurring is identified and evidence of illegal activity is obtained.
B. The CAPP assigned DAG in cooperation with City staff, Police Department and/or Sheriff’s Office, and any participating state agency partners, will determine whether the parcel, owner, and/or occupant should be the subject of administrative action in accordance with this MOU.
C. Preparation of Forms. Following the determination that an administrative case should be initiated, the forms agreed upon by the parties shall be completed by assigned City staff and prepared for service.
D. Service of Notice. Assigned City staff shall cause notices of violation, citations, or orders to show cause to be posted and served in accordance with applicable law.
E. Voluntary Compliance. The property owner will be provided with an opportunity to voluntarily abate and enter into a stipulated administrative order resolving the case.
F. Default or Hearing. Where a notice of violation and citation has been served and the property owner is non-compliant and does not request a hearing, a default order containing a provision for an abatement warrant will be requested. In the event that the property owner seeks an appeal or the administrative action is initiated through an order to show cause, then the assigned OAG DAG and staff will present the case before the administrative hearing body and will seek imposition of fines and an order to abate.
G. Abatement Warrant. Immediately following the hearing and service of the order, either OAG staff or City staff assigned to implement the CAPP will seek an abatement warrant, and ensure that all applicable state and local laws are followed prior to causing the recordation of an abatement lien.
12 - 17 February 13, 2024
H. Cost Recovery. Costs of enforcement will be documented and tallied and, if the costs of enforcement are not voluntarily paid, the assigned OAG DAG will record the costs against the parcel as a property tax lien in accordance with applicable provisions of the Government Code.
VI. ANNUAL REPORT
One year following commencement of the CAPP, and on a yearly basis thereafter, OAG staff in coordination with City staff, will produce a report to the City Council providing statistical information and summarizing enforcement actions undertaken on behalf of the City through the CAPP.
VII. FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT AND PROPERTY
Each party shall be responsible for providing its own employees and staff with any and all property, equipment, furniture, and furnishings of whatever kind or description, necessary for carrying out its responsibilities.
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE FINES AND CANNABIS COST RECOVERY FUND A. Administrative fines assessed against unlicensed commercial cannabis operators as a consequence of CAPP actions shall be deposited into a fund maintained by the City entitled the Cannabis Cost Recovery Fund.
B. Monies retained in the Cannabis Cost Recovery Fund shall be used in accordance with section XIII.C., below, to only reimburse the Parties for unrecoverable enforcement costs, if any.
C. The Cannabis Cost Recovery Fund shall be maintained until termination of this MOU or until the last abatement lien recorded as a consequence of a CAPP action is released, whichever is later. Thereafter, any sums remaining in the Cannabis Cost Recovery Fund may be used in any manner the City deems appropriate.
IX. ASSET FORFEITURE
A. Proceeds derived from asset forfeiture as a result of the CAPP operations, whether under state or federal law, will be shared among the Parties as set forth herein. All forfeiture procedures and sharing will comply with the appropriate provisions of state and federal law, as well as the policies of the Parties. Any modification to the asset forfeiture provisions of this MOU must be set forth in writing and be approved by the Parties.
B. Use of Asset Forfeiture Funds for CAPP Operations.
Except as otherwise required by applicable law, the asset forfeiture funds generated by the CAPP operations shall be deposited into the Cannabis Cost Recovery 13 - 17 February 13, 2024
Fund as set forth in section VIII, above. The use of asset forfeiture funds for the CAPP operations shall be in strict accordance with the state statutes and regulations governing the use of such funds. No Party entitled to a share of those funds pursuant to this MOU shall have a right to distribution of its share of those funds unless approved by the Parties as provided herein. The balance of asset forfeiture funds shall be used by the City as permitted by state laws.
C. Maintenance of Asset Forfeiture Accounts
The OAG shall maintain a log of all assets seized as a result of CAPP actions. The City is the fiduciary agency and shall be responsible for receiving and administering all asset forfeiture funds including the receipt and disbursement of funds generated by asset forfeiture, and all funds generated by CAPP activity shall pass through the City. The SAAG or SDAG overseeing the CAPP shall be notified of all asset forfeiture funds received by the City when they are received and disbursements shall be made in accordance with applicable asset forfeiture state laws. Monies shall be held in a manner and fashion in accordance with applicable federal and state laws. Interest earned on all funds, if any, shall be deposited into the Cannabis Cost Recovery Fund.
X. TERM OF AGREEMENT
A. The term of this agreement is for the period beginning February 13, 2024 through June 30, 2025. Every term thereafter will be a one year term or until the MOU is terminated by one of the Parties.
B. The term of this MOU may be amended by request of one Party with the agreement of the other Party.
C. The City may withdraw from the MOU at any time by providing the OAG written notice to the SAAG, containing the effective date of withdrawal. The OAG may withdraw from the MOU at any time by providing the City written notice to the City contact, containing the effective date of the withdrawal.
D. Budget Contingency Clause: It is mutually agreed that if the Budget Act of the current fiscal year and/or any subsequent fiscal years covered under this MOU does not appropriate sufficient funds for the CAPP, this MOU shall be of no further force and effect. In this event, the OAG shall have no liability to pay any funds or provide any services whatsoever to the City or to furnish any other consideration under this MOU and City shall not be obligated to perform any provisions of this MOU.
XI. COMPENSATION OF PERSONNEL
The Parties shall remain responsible for establishing the salaries and benefits including, but not limited to, overtime and Worker’s Compensation Insurance, and for compensating their assigned personnel.
14 - 17 February 13, 2024
The CAPP is not an independent entity nor an employer. Any employee of the City or contractor working for the City who performs tasks for, or in support of, the CAPP shall be compensated in accordance with the terms of their employment with or in accordance with the terms of their employment or contract with the City. Any employee of the OAG or contractor working for the OAG who performs tasks for, or in support of, the CAPP, shall be compensated in accordance with the terms of their employment or contract with the OAG.
XII. INSTRUCTIONS FOR REIMBURSEMENT
A. City staff and PD and/or Sheriff’s Office shall be responsible for logging and documenting all costs incurred in causing the abatement of unlawful commercial cannabis activities, including, but not limited to, administrative costs. Responsible City staff shall complete a memorandum of costs verifying the investigation and prosecution costs incurred for each case to be used to support an administrative order finding. The memorandum of costs shall identify the assessor parcel number associated with each case, the identity and hourly rate of officers and staff that worked on each case, and description of the tasks undertaken to achieve the abatement of the nuisance.
B. OAG staff assigned to the CAPP shall use the OAG’s case management system for logging time incurred in each case, and shall ensure that all costs associated with the time entries are included in requests for final administrative orders. Work undertaken by DAGs will be billed at a rate of $220 per hour; work undertaken by OAG legal analysts or paralegals shall be billed at a rate of $205 per hour; work undertaken by assigned Special Agents shall be billed at a rate of $150 per hour. DAGs assigned to CAPP shall prepare declarations of costs to support an administrative order.
C. Any and all records pertaining to the enforcement costs incurred through the CAPP shall be maintained at a location designated by the Parties, and readily available to the Parties.
In addition, all records and reports generated by either Party in connection with the CAPP shall be maintained for a period of at least four (4) years following termination of this MOU and shall continue to be available to the parties.
XIII. COST RECOVERY
A. Each Party is responsible for funding its own activities in implementing and carrying out the CAPP and each Party shall be entitled to recover enforcement and prosecution costs incurred in undertaking enforcement actions through the CAPP in accordance with State and local law governing nuisance abatement.
B. In no event shall either party to this MOU have the authority to unilaterally reduce or eliminate the obligation a property owner has under an administrative order to pay enforcement costs incurred by either the City or the OAG.
C. In circumstances where the costs of abatement exceed the actual value of a subject property and funds recoverable through a tax lien sale are insufficient to cover all 15 - 17 February 13, 2024
enforcement and prosecution costs of the CAPP operation, or in other circumstances where costs cannot be recovered through abatement liens, then the Cannabis Cost Recovery Fund shall be used to reimburse the Parties for their proportionate share of expended enforcement costs.
D. In the event that costs of enforcement cannot be recovered from violators or paid from the Cannabis Cost Recovery Fund, each Party shall bear their own unrecoverable costs. In no event shall either party be responsible for reimbursing the other for unrecovered costs.
XIV. LIABILITY, INDEMNIFICATION AND RESPONSIBILITY
A. For the purpose of indemnification, each Party shall be responsible for the acts, errors or omissions of its assigned officers, agents or employees, and shall incur any liabilities arising out of the services and activities of those officers, agents or employees while participating in the CAPP. Personnel assigned to implement the CAPP shall be deemed to be continuing under the employment of their respective agencies, and, as to peace officers, shall continue to have the same powers, duties, privileges, responsibilities and immunities as are conferred upon them as peace officers in their own jurisdictions.
B. No Party shall be responsible for the acts, errors, or omissions of the other Party’s officers, agents or employees, nor incur any liabilities arising out of the services and activities of the other Party’s officers, agents or employees.
C. In the event of a claim (Underlying Claim) by a third party against one or both Parties based on the CAPP activities, the Parties agree to defer any claims against each other and their respective officers, agents or employees until the Underlying Claim is settled or otherwise determined, unless the statutory time restrictions are about to expire.
Thereafter, any claims between the Parties shall be resolved in accordance with law.
XV. PRESS POLICY
The Press Policy of the CAPP shall follow the OAG’s Department Operations Manual.
A Party that wants to include media on the scene of an ongoing enforcement operation shall obtain approval from the other Party prior to inviting media.
XVI. SIGNATURES
The undersigned represents that the undersigned has the authority to execute this agreement on behalf of the Party that they represent. The Parties, evidenced by the signatures of their authorized representatives hereto, agree that this MOU shall be effective upon approval of both Parties, and shall remain in full force and effect until either Party withdraws from the CAPP as provided herein. It is further acknowledged by both Parties that certain portions of this agreement may require amendments during the term of the MOU. Such amendments will become effective when signed by the Parties’ 16 - 17 February 13, 2024
authorized representatives.
If any provision of this MOU is held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall have no effect on the validity of the remaining provisions of the MOU and such remaining provisions shall continue to remain in full force and effect.
AGREED HERETO BY THE PARTIES BASED ON THE SIGNATURES OF THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES THAT APPEAR BELOW:
OAG/CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CANNABIS ADMINISTRATIVE
PROSECUTOR PROGRAM
___________________________________ _______________________ Date
___________________________________ _______________________ Date
CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY
____________________________________ _______________________ Date
____________________________________ _______________________ Date
17 - 17 February 13, 2024