California City City Council
April 14, 2026

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY
April 14, 2026
Marquette Hawkins
MAYOR
Jim Creighton

MAYOR PRO TEM
Della Clark
Ronald Smith

COUNCIL MEMBERS
Sean Grayson

INTERIM CITY

MANAGER
AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL/ HOUSING AUTHORITY/ SUCCESSOR AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 14, 2026 @ 5:00 PM

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
21000 HACIENDA BLVD., CALIFORNIA CITY, CA 93505 &

VIA ZOOM
If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, contact the City Clerk at (760) 373-7140 or via email at [email protected]. We request a 24-hour notification prior to the meeting in order for the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 American Disabilities Act Title II) Zoom instructions and notes:

Web Link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/87988480756
Meeting ID: 879 8848 0756
Passcode: 288834

1. Public can dial into the Zoom line:
a. One tap mobile: +16694449171,87254527178# US
b. Dial the following number: +1 564 217 2000 US

2. Comments
a. Public must join Zoom Webinar to comment
b. Keep your mic on Mute until you are requested to speak c. Use the “Raise your Hand” button to request to speak or, d. Send a chat request to the City Clerk for a request to speak, and the City Clerk will unmute you.
e. When requested to speak, state your name for the record f. Re-mute when your time to speak has ended
Pg 1
1 CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY
April 14, 2026
The public is urged to listen to the meeting in a quiet place to avoid background noise. We also request public to MUTE your audio device when not commenting to avoid disruption during meeting.
**Please take this time to turn off your cell phones ** CLOSED SESSION 4:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL
Councilmembers: Clark, Smith, Mayor Pro Tem Creighton, Mayor Hawkins

ADOPT THE AGENDA

PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public are welcome to address the City Council ONLY on those items listed on the Closed Session agenda. Each member of the public will be given (3) three minutes to speak

CLOSED SESSION
CS 1. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
Government Code Section 54957
Title: City Manager.

CS 3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
One case: Jeremy Kosick v. City of California City, (Case No. BCV-24-103946)

REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION

CITY COUNCIL CONVENES TO REGULAR MEETING
REGULAR MEETING 5:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE / INVOCATION
ROLL CALL –
Councilmembers: Clark, Smith, Mayor Pro Tem Creighton, Mayor Hawkins

DEPARTMENT REPORTS
Parks and Recreation Cannabis
OHV City Manager
Housing
Pg 2
2 CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY
April 14, 2026

CITY CLERK REPORTS/RECEIVED COMMUNICATIONS
J.M. Powers – April 6, 2026

CIVIC/COMMUNITY/ORGANIZATION ANNOUNCEMENTS

PUBLIC BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR / PUBLIC COMMENT
This portion of the meeting is reserved for the public to address the City Council on any matter NOT on this agenda and over which the City Council has jurisdiction. Please state your name for the record and limit your comments to (3) three minutes. The City Council will receive the comments but cannot engage in back-and- forth discussion with the public or make any decision. The City Council can direct staff to bring the item back to a future agenda for discussion.

CONSENT CALENDAR

WAIVER OF FULL READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Consideration to waive full-text reading of all Resolutions and Ordinances by single motion made at the start of each meeting, subject to the ability of the City Council / Agency to read the full text of selected resolutions and ordinances when the item is addressed by subsequent motion. All items on the consent calendar are considered routine, and non-controversial and will be approved by (1) one motion if no member of the council, staff, or public wishesto comment or ask questions. Public comments are to be limited to (3) three minutes. Roll call vote required.

CC 1. Approve City Check Register dated 03/06/26 – 03/19/26 CC 2. Staff Report: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
Subject: Update of the Actions and Activities of Capitol Advocacy Partners (CAP) on Behalf of the City
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the report.

CC 3. Staff Report: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
Subject: 1) Adoption of a Successor Agency Resolution No. 26-3226 Declaring Certain Property Owned by the Successor Agency to be Exempt Surplus Land Pursuant to the Surplus Land Act Because it is not Necessary for the Successor Agency’s Agency Use and the Successor Agency Desires to Transfer Such Property to the County of Kern as a Local Agency to Agency Transfer Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(D) and Section 103(c)(5) of the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s Updated Surplus Land Act Guidelines; Finding that Such Declaration is Exempt from Environmental Review under California Environmental Quality Act; and Taking Related Actions; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Grant Deed for the Property Transferring it to Kern County Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council, acting as the Successor Agency Board, adopt Resolution No. 26-3226 and authorize the City Manager to execute the grant deed.

CC 4. Staff Report: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
Subject: Adoption of a Governing Body Resolution No. 26-3227 of the City Council of California City, California, Approving the City Manager or Deputy City Manager to Serve as the Authorized Agent for the City in Relation to the Fiscal Year 22/23 State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program (SLCGP)
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 26-3227 approving authorized agents for the SLCGP.

CC 5. Staff Report: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
` Subject: 1) Adopt a Resolution No. 26-3228 to Approve an Attorney-Client Fee Agreement with the Law Offices of Veronica M. Aguilar, A.P.C. to Represent the SDI Advisory Committee and its Members; 2) Authorize the Initial Deposit in the Amount of $10,000 to be Paid From the SDI Fund; and 3) Authorize the City Manager to Process Billing Under the Agreement as Pre-Issue Not Requiring Council Approval for Payment Issuance
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the agreement, authorize the initial Pg
3 3

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY
April 14, 2026
deposit, and authorize the City Manager to process payment as pre-issue.

CC 6. Staff Report: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
` Subject: Accept $50,000 in Donated Funds and Authorize the City Manager to Approve Expenditures to Match the Conditioned Use of the Funds
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council accept the donated funds and authorize the City Manager to approve the needed expenditures.

CC 7. Staff Report: Kenny Cooper, Finance Manager
` Subject: Adoption of Resolution Nos. 26-3229, 26-3230, and 26-3231 of the City Council of California City, California, to 1) Initiate Proceeding for the Levy and Collection of Assessments for Aspen Mall Landscape and Lighting District; 2) Preliminary Approval of the Engineer’s Report for the Levy and Collection of Assessments; 3) Declaring Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments with Input Requested at a Public Hearing on May 12, 2026 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution Nos. 26-3229, 26-3230, and 26-3231 as presented.

CC 8. Staff Report: John Paul Maier, Deputy City Manager / City Clerk ` Subject: Approval of the Biennial Conflict of Interest Code Review and Notice to City Council Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the 2026 Local Agency Biennial Notice under the Political Reform Act and direct the Deputy City Manager / City Clerk to review the Conflict-of-Interest Code and provide an update at a future City Council Meeting.

CC 9. Staff Report: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
` Subject: 1) Approval of a Job Description for the Position of Police Officer Trainee; 2) Set the Pay Scale for the Position at Range 34; and 2) Authorization to Underfill One (1) Police Officer Vacancy with a Police Officer Trainee
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the job description, set the pay scale, and authorize the filling of a police officer vacancy.

CONTINUED BUSINESS
CB 1. Staff Report: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
Subject: Update of the City Council Declared Fiscal Distress Actions and Calling for a Special City Council Meeting on May 19, 2026, for a Budget Workshop
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the report and call for the May 19, 2026, special meeting.

CB 2. Staff Report: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
` Subject: Review of Future Options for the City-Owned Tierra Del Sol Golf Course and California City Municipal Airport
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive the report and provide direction on future golf course and airport options, including the appointment of an Airport Ad Hoc Committee to engage external agencies governing boards.

CB 3. Staff Report: Joe Barragan, Public Works Director Subject: Adoption of Resolution No. 3232 of the City Council of California City, California, and Accept the Bid from Coast Construction, LLC for the Little League Lights Project at Central Park, with a Contract Sum of $235,246.39; Authorize Contingency and Project Management Costs, and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Construction Agreement Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 3232, finding Coast Construction Group LLC the lowest responsive bidder with a $235,244.56 base bid for the Little League Lights Project, authorize contingency and management costs, and authorize the City Manager to sign the construction agreement.

Pg 4
4 CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY
April 14, 2026
CB 4. Staff Report: Joe Barragan, Public Works Director ` Subject: Adoption of Resolution No. 3233 of the City Council of the City of California City, California, to Authorize the Purchase of a Front Loader from Clairemont Equipment in the Amount of $242,304.32
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council approve a Resolution No. 3233 authorizing the Interim City Manager to purchase the new front loader from Clairemont Equipment for $242,304.32

NEW BUSINESS
NB 1. Staff Report: Joe Barragan, Public Works Director ` Subject: Approve Resolutions Nos. 3234 and 3235 of the City Council of the City of California City, California, Authorizing BHT Task Orders to Tie-In Well 16 to the Transmission Line and the Rehabilitation of Well 15A
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the two proposed Resolutions Nos. 3234 and 3235 authorizing the Interim City Manager to: 1) sign the BHT Task Order for $53,950; and 2) sign an agreement with BWP for $124,98
NB 2. Staff Report: John Paul Maier, Deputy City Manager / City Clerk; Christy Lopez, Assistant City Attorney ` Subject: Adoption of Resolution No. 3236 of the City Council of the City of California City, California, Adopting a City Council Decorum Policy
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution No. 3236 of the City Council of the City of California City, California, approving a City Council Decorum Policy.

NB 3. Staff Report: Victor Ponto, City Attorney
` Subject: Adoption of Resolution No. 3237 of the City Council of The City of California City, California, Appointing Sean Grayson for the Position of City Manager and Approving the Related Employment Agreement
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 3237 and approve the employment contract appointing Sean Grayson as the City Manager NB 4. Staff Report: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
Subject: Authorize the Release of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the Fire Reconstruction Project at the Desert Jade Senior Housing Complex
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council, acting as the Housing Authority Board, authorize the release of the RFP
COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS, AGENDA REQUESTS, AND AB1234 REPORTS This portion of the meeting is reserved for council members to present information, announcements, and items that have come to their attention. The Brown Act precludes Council, staff, or public discussion. Short staff responses are appropriate. The Council will take no formal action. A Council member may request the City Clerk to calendar an item for consideration at a future meeting or refer an item to staff.

ADJOURNMENT
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING- April 10, 2026
I, John Paul Maier, Deputy City Manager / City Clerk for the City of California City, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing notice was posted on all official City bulletin boards and the City’s website at least 72 hours prior to the meeting in compliance with the provisions of the Brown Act.

Pg 5
5 DR-PARK

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Leanndrea Weible, Park Coordinator
SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Monthly Department Report OPERATIONS:
• Strata Center will be open daily Tuesday-Saturday.
• Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, Can’t Stop Won’t Stop youth in action will be utilizing the Strata Center until June 27, 2026, from 5 pm-8 pm for basketball practice. • April 27, 2026- May 28, 2026, Strata Center will be open from 10 am-12 pm for indoor walking.
• Wednesdays, the Art Center is used for Zumba Classes from 5 pm-6 pm. Anyone interested is welcome to attend
CURRENT ACTIVITIES:

Staff is currently taking inventory of pool supplies and performing necessary maintenance on pool equipment in preparation for opening the pool. Staff is anticipating an opening day of Friday, May 29, 2026, 2 pm-6 pm.

Anticipated pool schedule is as follows: Daily, Tuesday-Saturday, 12 pm-6 pm.

Daily rate per the Master Fee Schedule is $2.50 per person.

UPCOMING:

The Park Commission is having a community Workshop for community input to prepare a 5-year plan for Parks and Recreation at their next meeting. The entire community is encouraged to attend the Park and Recreation Commission Meeting scheduled for Monday, April 20, 2026, at 7:00 pm in the Council Chambers at City Hall.

Pg 6
6 DR-OHV

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Inge Elmes, OHV Manager
SUBJECT: OHV MONTHLY DEPARTMENT REPORT
Events
Easter weekend was a successful holiday with a good number of OHV visitors. Memorial Day Holiday will be the last notable weekend before the season tapers off.

Operations
Ground crew continues to maintain OHV recreation area and amenities while park aids assist visitors. Focus will be on closing out project agreements and preparing for the upcoming new permit season.

Manager Updates
G26 OHMVR Division Grant Program public review and comment period is from March 3, 2026 – May 4, 2026, by 5pm. You may submit comments directly to the division at [email protected] or to the OHV Manager at [email protected].

Finance Report
For the month of March, OHV sales totaled $5,444.00. These numbers are actuals and reflect only amounts received within each month. Please refer to Monthly Permit Sales report for FY totals. *OHV sales are deposited to specific OHV Permit Program GL revenue codes #29-3992 through #29-3998. Please refer to the financial statement for details. Not all proceeds are deposited in the same month.
**Some merchandise was purchased by staff at a discounted rate. All sales for merchandise are allocated to GL revenue code 29-3691.

Attachment
OHV Permit Program Sales Spreadsheet
Pg 7
7 MAR MONTHLY OHV PROGRAM SALES FY 25/26
SALES 2026 Totals QTY CASH QTY CHECK QTY
CREDIT

CARD QTY PAYPAL TOTALS YTD TOTALS
Single Permits (Prorated) $10 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0
Single Permits $15 70 $1,050 19 $285 55 $825 5 $75 $2,235 32,370.00 Small Family (Prorated) $40 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0
Small Family $60 5 $300 3 $180 2 $120 1 $60 $660 35,520.00 Large Family (Prorated) $80 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0
Large Family $100 0 $0 1 $100 0 $0 0 $0 $100 9,600.00
OHV 4 Pack (Prorated) $35 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0
OHV 4 Pack $50 10 $500 3 $150 6 $300 1 $50 $1,000 16,600 RV Pass (Prorated) $15 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0
RV Pass $30 2 $60 0 $0 1 $30 1 $30 $120 5,970.00
Single Dump Pass $5 15 $75 0 $0 6 $30 0 $0 $105 1,265.00 Single Water Pass $5 12 $60 0 $0 7 $35 0 $0 $95 1095
Additional Permits (Prorated) $5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 Additional Permits $10 4 $40 0 $0 2 $20 0 $0 $60 1,530.00 Free Free 2 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0
Residents Permits Free 7 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0
Paypal Fees - $4 $4 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 8 $32 $32 $464
Holiday Week Day - Power $25 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 325 Holiday Week Day - Water $15 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 90
Non-Holiday Weekday-Power $15 1 $15 0 $0 3 $45 0 $0 $60 2,010.00 Non-Holiday Weekday-Water $10 0 $0 0 $0 2 $20 0 $0 $20 460.00 Holiday Weekend - Power $40 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 640
Holiday Weekend - Water $20 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 220
Non-Holiday Weekend-Power $25 4 $100 0 $0 1 $25 0 $0 $125 1,975.00 Non-Holiday Weekend-Water $15 2 $30 0 $0 1 $15 0 $0 $45 615 Shower Tokens $0.50 352 $176 20 $10 8 $4 0 $0 $190 2,926.00 Transient Lodging $150 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0
Vendor Fees $1 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 2,955.00
Special Event Fees $5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0
Map Sales $3 0 $0 0 $0 2 $6 0 $0 $6 135
Donations $1 4 $4 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $4 236
Hoodies $40 0 $0 2 $80 1 $40 0 $0 $120 5,190.00
Short Sleeve Shirts $20 2 $40 0 $0 2 $40 0 $0 $80 1,490.00 Long Sleeve Shirts $30 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 520.00
Caps $20 6 $120 0 $0 3 $60 0 $0 $180 1,260.00
Bucket Hats $20 1 $20 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $20 140.00
Visors $15 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0
Beenies $15 2 $30 0 $0 1 $15 0 $0 $45 1,240.00
Tumblers $25 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 120.00
Magnets $5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 55.00
Ornaments $10 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 60.00
Stickers $3 1 $3 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $3 84.00
Coffee Mugs $15 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 265.00
Shot Glasses $10 1 $10 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $10 155.00
Wine Glasses $15 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 90.00
Pint Glasses $20 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 80.00
Coasters Cork $5 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 30.00
Coasters Slate $10 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 10.00
Keychain $10 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 10.00
Postcards $1 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 4.00
Sunscreen $3 2 $6 0 $0 1 $3 0 $0 $9 33.00
Lighters $3 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 9.00
Toiletry Kits $15 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 60.00
Emergency Kits $30 2 $60 1 $30 1 $30 0 $0 $120 1,680.00 MONTHLY TOTALS $2,699 $835 $1,663 $247 $5,444 $129,586.00 Pg 8
8 DR-HOUSING

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Nicole Jarmon- Housing Manager
SUBJECT: HOUSING MONTHLY DEPARTMENT REPORT

BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION
Desert Jade
Currently, we have 90 apartments that are filled.

The waitlist has been updated, and we currently have 67 applicants.

Three units are undergoing rehab, and applications are being reviewed.

Desert Jade has three units with a red tag due to the fire.

March 24th, we had our monthly food giveaway.

Legends
Currently has 6 apartments and 6 houses filled.

Waitlist is combined with Desert Jade.

Pg 9
9 10

DR-CANNABIS

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Carina Robinson, Cannabis Program Manager (CPM) and Tax Administrator
Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: CANNABIS MONTHLY DEPARTMENT REPORT

MONTHLY ACTIVITY
• Cannabis Tax Report attached
• Cannabis Intent to Renew Letters mailed via USPS and emailed April 1, 2026. Letters are due May 1, 2026, with renewals done by June 30, 2026. Once signed letters are received, billing will be issued for the FY26/27 cannabis permits. This process satisfies requirements found in CCMC Sec. 5-6.504(a).
• Email communication and phone calls with several operators regarding Intent to Renew Letters. Introductions were made and current contact information was updated with a few permits.
• Continuing to prepare for onsite inspections to ensure continued permit compliance for renewals and canopy space/tax assessments.
• Compliant received at 7150 Collins regarding exterior lights were blinding pilots at airport.

After several emails, drove by and met Operator at 7150 Collins. Ensured exterior lights follow permit and building codes. Operator installed shields on lights covers to direct lights downward and provided photos as proof of illuminated area. Operator worked closely with Public Works Director to inspect and reach a resolution. Case closed per CPM. • Complaint received for odor violations at 21001 Maverick Street (Attil Farms). Shared complaint with PD Code Enforcement (see PD report). CPM sent email advising operator of community complaints, reminder of CCMC Sec 5-6.906(h)(1)(2) and requested updated copies of their odor control plans and manufacturing specifications for equipment used to mitigate odor. CPM will follow up and make an onsite visit within 3-4 working days if there is no reply from the operator.
• Received Prop 64 Local Evaluation Plan (LEP) and Progress Tracking spreadsheet.

Reviewing all information and meeting with Sean Grayson (TCM) 4/8/2026. Chris Borden requested meeting to review grant requirements moving forward with responsibilities and tasks. Will set meeting by week ending 4/17/2026.
10 11
• Met with Accountant regarding newly created cannabis operator contact list. Cannabis spreadsheet updated continuously with accurate information for accounting department.

Last spreadsheet was from 2023 and outdated/missing information. File archived. • On Site Inspection Kick-Off:

1. Letters email and mailed to operators Wednesday, April 1, 2026.

2. Signed intent letters are May 1, 2026.

3. After receiving the signed Intent to Renew letters, site visits to each facility will ensure compliance with CCMC’s.

4. Site visits will conduct May 2026 to ensure compliance with permit renewals by June 30, 2026.

6. Upon discovery of any code violations, CPM will speak directly with the operators on premises and inquire about plan of corrections.

7. Upon return to the office, letters to the operators with identified violations and CCMC’s will be processed. This step is to ensure compliance before permit renewals for FY 26/27 are documented and addressed by the operator.

8. Will communicate with Accounting Department to ensure Tax assessments/payments are up to date. If not, CPM will speak with operators about making tax payments current so as to not jeopardize their renewals.
• Code Enforcement:

On Thursday March 26, 2026, met with Lieutenant Hayes, Officer Chambers, Officer Duque and Officer Bearden regarding code enforcement, complaints, citations, payments, and sharing information between our departments. We decided a OneDrive file would be the most effective and efficient for organizing and sharing documents between the departments.

1. Code Enforcement Officer stated drive through visits near properties are completed daily and documented if odor is detected from parcels.

2. Code Enforcement Officer makes notes and documents the date, times, and violations. Officer also varies trips so operators do not become aware of routines or scheduled trips.

3. We discussed all complaints for odor control/code enforcement and violations should be directed to PD for code enforcement execution.

4. Code Enforcement Officer stated the operator pays at minimum $1000.00 per complaint. They either come into the utilities window, PD, or can pay online.

5. We discussed sharing documents and reports in a OneDrive file so that CPM can keep up with the citations and any repeat offenders of the same code violations.

6. We discussed that we cannot go off hearsay and what smells in the community if no complaints are brought forth directly to code enforcement (PD) and put in writing.

We thought this information might be able to be shared in a council meeting/directors report so that personal/community complaints can be addressed in a compliant and professional manner.

7. SEE CODE ENFORCEMENT REPORT for written citations. Be advised, in the past, several citations were not from official documented complaints from residents, but rather from regulatory code enforcement site inspections.

8. Explained to all meeting participants it will be CMP’s responsibility to follow up with the operators violating their own Odor Control plan per CCMCs, site plan review (SPR) approvals, and manufacturing specifications per equipment on file. 11 12

9. Informed the team that if repeat offenders choose to continue in a non-compliant manner it could put their permit in jeopardy of suspension until codes are adhered too.

10. All persons attending the meeting understood code enforcement is required to be performed by PD, not the Cannabis Program Manager/Tax Administrator.

11. Created the OneDrive folder March 27, 2026, shared with all officers, Sean Grayson (ICM), and our cannabiscompliance email.

ONGOING ACTIVITY
• Provide witness support for department cash drawer drop at end of work, when required due to low staff availability.
• Provide witness support for staff disciplinary actions when required due to low staff availability.
• Reviewing “Application Procedure to Operate A Cannabis Business in California City” and “Cannabis Business Permit Application Form”. Ensuring information is up to date with current Codes, Fee Schedule, and Resolutions.
• Updating electronic files for each operator for all correspondences. Documents will be time, date, stamped upon receipt and scanned/uploaded to the ‘P’ Drive. • Continuing to create internal cannabis checklists for onsite inspections per the CCMC and DCC resources.
• Cannabis spreadsheet updated continuously with accurate information for accounting department.
• Reviewing facility files for accurate cannabis tax reporting. • Attending Cannabis Advisory Committee meetings (virtual attendance). Public comments are submitted via email and verbally as required.
• Attending Department of Cannabis Control meetings (virtual attendance). Public comments are submitted via email and verbally as required.

QUARTERLY TAX REPORT
Total taxes collected for FY 25/26 to date are $648,561.44:
• Cannabis Back Taxes - $21,752.43
• Cannabis Cultivation - $425,399.64
• Cannabis Non-Cultivation - $199,883.53
• Cannabis Penalties & Interest - $1,525.84

ATTACHMENT
• Cannabis Income Report for FY 25/26, Q3 – no changes
12 13
13 DR - CITY MANAGER
4898-7406-7085 v1

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: City Manager’s Report
March 24, 2026 City Council Meeting AB1234, Questions and Comments Follow-Up:

At the March 24, 2026, City Council meeting, there were questions and direction provided by the City Council. Below, please find the answers and responses to be shared with the City Council and the community
The following is an update on information, questions, or requests that came from agendized items:
• LiDAR training and our police officers
o California City Police Department does not use LiDAR and doesn’t have any LiDAR trained officers. The City does have RaDAR and officers are trained in its use. Please see the response to Mayor Hawkins question in AB1234 for additional information.
• Missing sign at Neuralia and Redwood
o Public Works will visit the area and either put the sign back up or include in in the next round of sign orders to replace.
• Reported increased wait times for Dial-A-Ride
o Dial-A-Ride ridership has been up and times for service have been down as we have had two buses instead of just one operating. There were a couple of days with only one bus because of scheduled repairs to one of the buses putting us back down to one, that did impact times for service negatively.
• Odor of cannabis on CCB West
o Please see the response to Mayor Hawkins question in AB1234 for additional information.
• Solar Site Plan Review (SPR) in monthly Planning Report, what does the City get from that project?
o
o
Pg 14
14 DR - CITY MANAGER
4898-7406-7085 v1
o The project is at the beginning of the process. There will be conditions for infrastructure needs in the area as well as other considerations brought forward as the project advances.
• Is the Apothio project related to the Solar SPR, they are close to each other? o The two projects are neighbors but have no connection of ownership or their applications.
• Can the no-parking signs on the lot north of the fire station come out? o Public Works will remove the signs.
• Do we have plans for the lot north of the fire station or ideas on its use? o The site had been contemplated for a number of uses, most recently to partner with Cerro Coso Community College for a fire training facility. That use is no longer being considered. The property (APN 205-330-18) is owned by the Successor Agency to Redevelopment and listed in the long-range plan for eventual sale. The parcel was part of the property purchased for the Villages Specific Plan using a loan from the SDI Fund.
• Were the containers on N. Neuralia sited and have they been moved? o The location was sited for multiple violations including containers. The containers are still on site, Code Enforcement is following up on the matter. • Report that the City has unclaimed funds with the State Controller’s Office o Both the City and the Housing Corporation have unclaimed funds. Staff will “claim” those that belong to the City, the Housing Authority, or the Successor Agency.
• Is the SDI CD in the bank dormant and can it be moved to SDI checking for cashflow? o Staff will evaluate if this is possible.
• What is the debit transaction in the bank statements from the Successor Agency? o This was due to the recent Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) submission approved by the City Council which includes a small amount to the City for administration and the debt services payment required annually under the master plan for the Successor Agency.
• Can anything be done about the Redwood dead end and the lip in the road? o The dead end of the side road was conducted after an accident in the area with CalTrans and City approval. Staff will be evaluating the lip in the road for grinding. • Information on streetlights that are out on CCB
o The streetlights were once owned by the City but were acquired by Southern California Edison (SCE) who is responsible for repairs. The City has submitted requests for repairs. It is anticipated that SCE will have a future project to replace the lights with new devices.

Pg 15
15 DR - CITY MANAGER
4898-7406-7085 v1
•
• Possibility of putting deposits received by the City in interest accounts. o This will be evaluated by staff.
• Air pollution District and the Carl Moyer grant for replacement of non-compliant motorized items
o All items on the approved surplus list will be evaluated for potential to receive Carl Moyer or other grants for replacement.
• Reported potential conflict with Andrew Paulden at Brown Armstrong. o The potential conflict has been evaluated by both Brown Armstrong and the City.

There is no conflict but out of an abundance of caution the City has requested and Brown Armstrong has agreed that there will be a “firewall” preventing communication about the City from the team working on the city’s audits to the person reported to potentially have a conflict.
• Direction that the audit include Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) o The City has had a practice of a management letter accompanying the audit. The management letter has come from staff and the audit from the audit firm. Our previous practices is similar to an MD&A but an MD&A is more extensive and requires the city to provide more information to create it. Staff will work with the auditing firm to evaluate this change.
• Request for a Thank You Letter to Congressman Obernolte for $1 million secured by his office for the Rancho Tract Waterline Replacement Project. o Staff will prepare a letter for the Mayor to sign and present. • Front Loader (NB 3) pulled and directed to return with uniform bids. o This item will return as continued business on the April14, 2026, agenda.

The following is an update on information, questions, or requests that came from AB1234 reports:

Councilmember Clark
• April 25 Connected Crown Women's Empowerment Brunch free from 10am-12pm o No staff action
• Consider fruit trees to line CCB
o This among other considerations has been considered before and would be considered in any future beautification project. There is not currently water to the median along CCB, that would have to be rectified as a precursor to any future beautification plan that requires water.
• City Hall beautification, live trees, succulents, etc. o There is no current plan for funding for this. Staff has reached out to REACH who has indicated they will be replacing the dead tree in the future, and they indicated they would be interested in a future collaboration with the city and other local nonPg 16 16 DR - CITY MANAGER
4898-7406-7085 v1
profits to address this request. This would be done in coordination with the new sign to be placed in front of City Hall.
• Community website to include senior center activities o The City’s current website is past end of life and will need to be replaced. A new website would include events calendaring for all City facilities including Senior Center activities. The Deputy City Manager / City clerk will be leading this project in next fiscal year.

Councilmember Smith
• Thank you to volunteers for their efforts for the Veteran’s Standdown event at the Strata Center
o No staff action
• CCB East at Highway 58 old and illegal signs potentially on county land, can they be removed?
o Staff will visit the area, identify the property owners and make contact with the business responsible for the sign (if available). We will report any signs in violation to the property owner or the County as applicable.
• All contracts and grants in a binder for the City Council and candidates. o This binder is intended to be populated in the future. • The Prop 64 grant should be used for cannabis enforcement and education. o The Proposition 64 grant has been updated to represent our new team configuration.

A grant amendment will be required for the transition from the Fire Department to the Cannabis Program and the activities of the funded positions realigned with the current team.
• Cannabis odor CCB west and enforcement of code and quality of life. o This is being evaluated by both Code Enforcement and the Cannabis Manager in a coordinated effort. There were cannabis odor citations in the month of February.

Staff will work to bring the work of both Code Enforcement and Cannabis Management forward to represent the specific action related to odor reconnaissance, detection, and enforcement.

Mayor Pro Tem Creighton
• Update on when the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) will come back before the Council to be placed on the ballot?
o To avoid confusion with the June 2026 election, the item was not anticipated to come before the City Council until the first meeting in June (after the election).

Staff anticipates having the language of the ordinance, frequently asked questions, and educational materials available prior to the City Council meeting. The timeline can be altered at the Council’s direction.

Pg 17
17 DR - CITY MANAGER
4898-7406-7085 v1
• Status of all of the grants that Capitol Advocacy Partners (CAP) is working on for the City.
o CAP has been requested to provide a written report to be included in the City Manager’s Department report for the April 14, 2026, meeting.

Mayor Hawkins
• Can the Airport Advisory Committee be reconstituted?
o The commission is allowed under our municipal code. The use of the commission and/or other advisory practices will be included in the options for the future of the airport scheduled for the April 14, 2026, City Council agenda. • Photos for current City Council on the website and in Council Chambers. o The City Clerk / Deputy City Manager is planning to do individual pictures for the Councilmembers not on the website in the coming weeks. An individual and group photo will also be scheduled after the vacant seat is filled by election in June. Staff intends to have the current City Council pictures hung at the entrance to the Council Chamber and to complete the Mayor’s wall on the interior back wall of the Chambers in the future.
• Funding has been secured for a fireworks show this year. Funding to replace the hoops as the Stata Center, to open the pool by Memorial Day, and for the Library backpack program has been secured.
o Action to accept the funds and authorize the purchases that exceed the City Manager’s purchasing authority will come before the City Council for this item. • Block grant update.
o The City submitted the project selected for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) process this year. There are additional steps in the process and more applications to be filled out prior to finding out what is awarded. • What would be the cost for LiDAR for our Police Department and the related training?
o Staff will bring forth a report in a future City Council meeting to address the cost of LiDAR for Police Vehicles and the cost of training officers. Staffing options for focused traffic enforcement will be presented at the same time.

Pg 18
18 Pg 19
19 Pg 20
20 Pg 21
21 Pg 22
22 CC 1

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kenny Cooper, Finance Manager
SUBJECT: Approve City Check Register dated 03/20/2026-04/09/2026 BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

The following checks have been prepared by the Finance Department. The items are provided to the Mayor and City Council for review and approval.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council discuss and approve the attached check register.

Pg 23
23 Pg 24
24 Pg 25
25 Pg 26
26 Pg 27
27 Pg 28
28 Pg 29
29 Pg 30
30 Pg 31
31 Pg 32
32 Pg 33
33 Pg 34
34 Pg 35
35 Pg 36
36 Pg 37
37 Pg 38
38 Pg 39
39 Pg 40
40 Pg 41
41 Pg 42
42 CC 2
4898-7406-7085 v1

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Update of the Actions and Activities of Capitol Advocacy Partners (CAP) on Behalf of the City
BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

On June 24, 2025, the City Council adopted a resolution approving a two-year agreement with Capitol Advocacy Partners to provide advocacy and grant writing services to the City. The City Council requested an update on the work performed by CAP. The attached report was provided by CAP to address the request from the City Council and their 2025 Review document.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None with this action.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the report.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Memo: Report on CAP Activities

2. CAP 2025 Review
Pg 43
43 MEMORANDUM
TO: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
City of California City Leadership
FROM: Dana DeBeaumont, Vanessa Vergara
Capitol Advocacy Partners (CAP)
DATE: April 8, 2026
SUBJECT: Report on CAP First Quarter 2026 Activities — April 8, 2026 At the request of the City Council, Capitol Advocacy Partners (CAP) is pleased to provide the following summary of recent and ongoing activities conducted on behalf of the City of California City for the first quarter of 2026 (January 1 – March 31, 2026). This report highlights CAP’s efforts across federal advocacy, grant development, and grant management. CAP remains committed to ensuring continuity of intent and activities despite any staff transitions, maintaining consistent progress and alignment with the City’s priorities.

Please do not hesitate to contact Dana DeBeaumont
([email protected] / 202-352-6856) or Vanessa Vergara ([email protected] / 626-747-1503) should any additional questions arise or if further clarification is needed regarding the information provided. CAP would also be happy to provide any additional materials or context upon request.

Additionally, CAP provides the City with a monthly activity report, as well as annual report, that we can provide to City Council upon request. Interim City Manager Sean Grayson receives these reports.

1. BJA Small, Rural, Tribe Body Worn Camera Microgrant Program - $19,463 Total Funding Request
Grant Project and Submission Details: CAP worked with California City Police Department staff, including Public Safety Director Shannon Hayes and Ana Bearden, to develop and submit a competitive application for the Bureau of Justice Assistance’s Small, Rural, Tribal Body-Worn Camera (SRTBWC) Micro-Grant Program. This program supports the purchase or lease of body-worn cameras (BWCs) as part of comprehensive law enforcement transparency and accountability initiatives and requires a 1:1 (dollar-for-dollar) local match.

The City requested $19,463. There was no additional fee to write the grant.

CAP led the full development and coordination of the application of 40 structured questions (yes/no, multiple choice, and short narrative responses) and a detailed budget and budget narrative. The application addressed all required federal evaluation criteria, including:

Description of the Issue; Project Design and Implementation; Capabilities and Competencies; Data Collection and Performance Measures; Budget and Budget Narrative. CAP worked closely with the Police Department to gather required data, confirm accuracy of responses, and strengthen narrative justification to ensure alignment with BJA priorities.

2. State Grant Preparation – Active Transportation Program (ATP) The California Transportation Commission has released guidelines and the application for the Active Transportation Program (ATP). CAP notified Public Works Director Joe Barragan, Pg 44
44 Engineering Consultant Ramon Pantoja, and Interim City Manager Sean Grayson of the funding opportunity, as well as discussing the opportunity months prior.

About ATP:
● Program Goal: The ATP is designed to increase the use of active transportation modes such as biking, walking, and rolling, while improving safety, mobility, public health, and environmental outcomes.
● Types of Projects Funded: The program supports a wide range of project types, including:
○ Infrastructure projects: bike lanes, sidewalks, trails, traffic safety improvements, Safe Routes to School/Transit, bike parking, and complete low-stress bicycle networks
○ Non-infrastructure projects: safety education, community engagement programs, and walking/biking promotion initiatives
○ Planning projects: development of bicycle, pedestrian, Safe Routes to School, or active transportation plans (particularly in disadvantaged communities) ● Award amounts vary depending on project size (small, medium, or large), with awards up to approximately $21 million. The application deadline is June 22, 2026.

Next Steps: CalCity staff has identified several project concepts that may be competitive for ATP funding, listed below in order of priority based on initial input from City staff and the City’s engineering consultant:

1. Cal City Blvd traffic safety and beautification improvements from Neuralia Blvd to Hacienda Blvd

2. Redwood Blvd pedestrian improvements from Airway Blvd to Hacienda Blvd

3. Poppy Blvd pedestrian improvements from N. Loop Blvd to Rushe Blvd

4. N. Loop Blvd pedestrian improvements from Hacienda Blvd to Poppy Blvd

5. Traffic signal improvements at Cal City Blvd and N. Loop Blvd

6. Traffic signal improvements at Cal City Blvd and Isabella Blvd Council feedback would be welcome. CAP has requested meeting with City staff to further refine project selection and begin preparation of a competitive application.

3. Federal Engagement - U.S. Department of Transportation regarding its Rural Opportunities to Use Transportation for Economic Success (ROUTES) Initiative Request for Information
The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Rural Opportunities to Use Transportation for Economic Success (ROUTES) Initiative is a federal effort aimed at improving transportation infrastructure and accessibility in rural communities by providing technical assistance, resources, and funding support.

As part of this initiative, the Department of Transportation (DOT) released a Request for Information (RFI) seeking input from rural communities on transportation challenges, infrastructure needs, and barriers to accessing federal funding.

CAP is working with Public Works Director Joe Barragan to gather relevant local data and insights to draft a response for City review and approval. This is a strategic opportunity to elevate the City’s transportation needs at the federal level and help shape future funding opportunities that are more accessible to rural communities. CAP will manage the full Pg 45
45 submission process to ensure the City’s priorities are clearly and effectively communicated to federal stakeholders.

4. Grant Management – State and Local Cybersecurity Grant CAP continues to support implementation of the City’s Cybersecurity Grant and recently met with City leadership to address procurement and vendor transition considerations.

Recent activities include:
● Advising on transition to a new IT provider
● Coordinating with the grant program manager to prevent delays ● Providing guidance on federal compliance requirements (NIST CSF 2.0, reporting, procurement)
● Supporting SAM.gov registration and compliance
● Coordinating with Cal OES on technical assistance and subaward processes CAP is facilitating coordination between all parties to ensure timely and compliant project implementation.

5. FY27 Appropriations – Community Project Funding (CPF): Isabella Boulevard Main Water Line Replacement - $1,585,928 Total Funding Request CPF Project and Submission Details: In March 2026, CAP submitted a Community Project Funding (CPF) request on behalf of the City of California City to Congressman Jay Obernolte and Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff, seeking $1,585,928 in federal funding for the Isabella Boulevard Main Water Line Replacement Project. This project aligns with and supports a broader effort authorized under the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (WRDA), which approved $1,902,808 for the project, demonstrating strong federal interest and eligibility.

The proposed project will replace approximately 8,830 linear feet of aging 12-inch water main, along with associated valves and hydrants, to improve drinking water reliability, reduce water loss, prevent service disruptions, and strengthen both public health and fire protection infrastructure.

CAP worked in close coordination with City Public Works leadership to develop a competitive, fully compliant request under the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Subcommittee — State and Tribal Assistance Grants (STAG) account (Drinking Water SRF). The application process included development of a detailed project narrative, budget, and responses to subcommittee-specific questions, as well as the collection and integration of strong letters of support.

In parallel, CAP executed a targeted federal engagement strategy, conducting outreach to both district and Washington, D.C. offices to proactively position the project, ensure awareness ahead of submission, and reinforce its competitiveness.

A funding decision from Congressman Obernolte on the House submission is expected by April 17, 2026. On the Senate side, project selections from Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff are anticipated between late April and May 2026. CAP will continue proactive engagement with all three offices during this period and will keep City leadership informed of any updates or follow-up requests.

Additional details are included in CAP’s March 2026 monthly activity report, which can be provided upon request.

Pg 46
46 6. Coordination with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – WRDA (Isabella Boulevard Project) CAP continues to support the City’s federally authorized water infrastructure project under the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), which approved $1,902,808 for the Isabella Boulevard Main Water Line Replacement. This authorization reflects strong federal recognition of the project’s importance; however, funding must still be secured through inclusion in a U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Work Plan.

Recent activities include:
● Coordinated directly with USACE staff to obtain a status update on the agency’s timeline for Work Plan consideration
● Provided USACE with an update on the City’s FY27 Community Project Funding request to demonstrate continued federal funding efforts
● Initiated preparation of an updated Letter of Intent (LOI), as requested by USACE, to formally reaffirm the City’s interest and document ongoing funding pursuits USACE confirmed on April 1, 2026 that the project remains under consideration. CAP is now coordinating a meeting between the USACE Los Angeles District and City leadership to strengthen engagement and visibility of the project.

7. Grant Management – FY2026 EPA Community Project (Upper Rancho Water Main Replacement Project - Phase II)
At the request of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), CAP is coordinating preparation of required environmental review documentation, including: a project description, area of potential effects (APE), and Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) documentation. CAP is leading document development in coordination with City staff to ensure compliance and avoid delays in project advancement. The project has been awarded $1,000,000; however, drawdown of funds is not anticipated until early 2027, as CAP will support the City in initiating and completing the required environmental review process in accordance with state and federal guidelines.

8. Grant Management – FY2024 EPA Community Project (Upper Rancho Water Main Replacement - Phase I)
CAP is supporting the City in advancing the final implementation phase of its Fiscal Year 2024 EPA Community Project for Upper Rancho Phase I. Following City Council approval of BHT Engineering’s task order to design and manage the project, the City is now progressing toward construction readiness.

CAP is working closely with Public Works Director Joe Barragan and Engineering Consultant Ramon Pantoja to support coordination with the EPA program officer and ensure all required next steps are completed This includes assisting with the development and review of a revised construction schedule, which will be submitted to EPA to maintain compliance with federal timelines and requirements. CAP anticipates the City will be able to begin drawing down the $1,000,000 award in mid-2026, pending EPA approval of all required procurement documentation and confirmation of compliance with federal guidelines.

9. Grant Identification – Senior Housing Security Improvements CAP is collaborating with City staff in identifying funding opportunities to address security concerns at senior housing facilities, including repeated mailbox break-ins and broader site safety needs. At the request of Housing Manager Nicole Jarmon, CAP conducted an initial review of relevant state and federal funding programs.To better understand the scope of the Pg 47
47 issue and refine a funding strategy, CAP is scheduled to meet with the Housing Manager on April 8, 2026. This discussion will focus on identifying priority needs, estimated costs, and potential pathways to secure funding, including alternative approaches if traditional grant opportunities are limited.

Pg 48
48 2025 Review - City of California City
California City netted a 2,707% return on investment from its collaboration with Capitol Advocacy Partners (CAP) in 2025.

Capitol Advocacy Partners 2025 achievements include:

1. Wrote one grant, pending award for total funding of $5,486.

2. Developed Community Project Application for $4,067,532. Status: Awarded for $1,000,000

3. Drafted and submitted three position letters.

4. Scheduled and participated in eight meetings with decision makers.

5. Participated in nine monthly calls with staff

6. Troubleshooted three issues

7. Provided 124 weekly and specialty updates
Summary of Work
In 2025, Capitol Advocacy Partners provided comprehensive federal advocacy, infrastructure funding strategy, and grant management support to advance the City of California City’s water, transportation, public safety, and community development priorities. CAP wrote and submitted one grant application (pending award) and successfully secured a $1,000,000 federal Community Project Funding award for the Upper Rancho Water Replacement Project – Phase II.

A significant portion of CAP’s work focused on advancing large-scale federal infrastructure initiatives, including WRDA post-authorization coordination, EPA noncompetitive application development, State Revolving Fund positioning, and Surface Transportation Reauthorization planning. CAP worked closely with City leadership, Public Works staff, engineering consultants, Congressional offices, and federal agencies to refine technical documentation, strengthen appropriations positioning, and ensure alignment with evolving federal priorities under the 119th Congress.

In addition to funding acquisition, CAP provided ongoing grant management and compliance support across state and federal programs, including cybersecurity and water infrastructure initiatives. This included structured coordination with project officers, development of compliance checklists and workflows, troubleshooting federal portals, and direct engagement with agency staff to maintain implementation momentum.

CAP also led high-level federal advocacy related to the Immigration Processing Center located within City limits, conducting extensive policy research, preparing briefing materials, and facilitating meetings with Congressional and state officials to ensure the City’s concerns were elevated within federal oversight discussions.

Throughout the year, CAP maintained consistent communication with City leadership through monthly strategy calls, legislative tracking, weekly updates, and in-person Pg 49
49 engagement to align advocacy efforts with infrastructure readiness and long-term funding strategy.

Collectively, these efforts strengthened California City’s federal positioning, enhanced grant oversight and compliance infrastructure, and established a forward-looking strategy for continued competitiveness in FY26 and FY27 funding cycles.

CAP is grateful for the opportunity to work with the City of California City and deeply appreciates the strong, collaborative partnership that supported this work. We look forward to continuing to build on this momentum in the year ahead.

Summary of Services
Engagement with Federal and State Grants
FY26 Community Project (Upper Rancho Water Replacement Project - Phase II) (Notified of $1,000,000 Award in February 2026 for grant CAP wrote/submitted in March 2025))
● Held FY26 appropriations relationship-building meeting (1/7) with Senator Alex Padilla’s Appropriations staff to discuss:
○ Anticipated House changes under the incoming administration ○ Updated Community Project guidance
○ Senator Padilla’s FY26 priorities
● Conducted follow-up outreach to Padilla’s team, pitching potential project concepts and soliciting strategic feedback.
● Met with the Office of Congressman Jay Obernolte to discuss:
○ The City’s FY26 Community Project proposal
○ The Congressman’s 2025 priorities
● Participated in meetings with Senator Schiff’s staff to discuss FY26/FY27 Community Project expectations and broader appropriations strategy. ● Conducted ongoing outreach to Senator Padilla’s and Congressman Obernolte’s offices regarding status updates and next steps.
● Coordinated directly with:
○ Public Works Director
○ BHT Engineering Consultant
○ City Manager
● Requested and obtained:
○ Updated project proposal
○ Estimated budget
○ Minimum funding threshold necessary to implement Phase II ● Reviewed the City’s FY24 EPA non-competitive workplan to extract updated and relevant technical data.
● Identified outdated metrics from prior applications and updated:
○ Infrastructure condition data
○ Community impact metrics
○ Water system capacity information
Pg 50
50 ● Conducted phone consultation with Public Works Director to confirm key narrative inputs and data points.
● Updated narrative to:
○ Reflect current infrastructure needs
○ Align with the priorities of the new administration and 119th Congress ○ Fit revised word/character limits for Senate applications ● Drafted and coordinated letters of support.
● Submitted finalized FY26 Community Project applications to:
○ Senator Alex Padilla
○ Senator Adam Schiff
○ Congressman Jay Obernolte
● Notified the City of its selection by Congressman Jay Obernolte. ● Drafted and transmitted formal thank-you letter to Congressman Obernolte. ● Reviewed Interior & Environment Subcommittee selections and provided internal update confirming inclusion.
● Provided City with status updates and outlined next steps in the appropriations process.
● Reviewed federal budget and appropriations developments to assess implications for project advancement.

Bulletproof Vest - Submitted in December 2025 (Pending Award) ➔ Conducted detailed review of BVP program materials within JustGrants to extract eligibility criteria, required documentation, and cost-share requirements. ➔ Held internal CAP strategy sessions to outline application components, confirm submission timeline, and determine data requirements.
➔ Coordinated with City public safety leadership to confirm departmental participation and gather required vest inventory and eligibility information. ➔ Drafted and managed follow-up communications with City staff to obtain required application data and clarifications.
➔ Collaborated with internal CAP team members to finalize responses and ensure compliance with DOJ program requirements.
➔ Adjusted submission timeline as necessary to accommodate technical system constraints while maintaining compliance with federal deadlines. ➔ Managed technical troubleshooting within the DIAMD portal, including registration updates and live coordination with the BVP Helpdesk to resolve login and access issues.
➔ Conducted direct troubleshooting calls with DOJ technical staff to ensure system readiness prior to submission.
➔ Provided internal updates outlining portal challenges and mitigation steps to maintain submission progress.
➔ Conducted final internal review of application materials and outstanding action items.
➔ Successfully submitted the BVP application on December 19, 2025.

Pg 51
51 State and Local Cybersecurity Grant (Grant Management for $250,000 Award) (Ongoing)
➔ Participated in coordination calls with City officials to review required grant documents and clarify submission expectations.
➔ Reviewed the official grant handbook and funded application to develop a comprehensive checklist of required documents and reporting obligations. ➔ Consolidated all required documentation into a centralized folder and distributed to the City Manager and HR Director for tracking and execution. ➔ Conducted multiple follow-ups with City leadership to confirm submission of required documents and secure necessary financial and governing forms. ➔ Reached out to the City Clerk to obtain executed governing documentation and verified Council action related to grant acceptance.
➔ Analyzed the grant timeline to ensure compliance with reporting deadlines and performance requirements.
➔ Reviewed grant attachments, budget documentation, and execution forms to ensure alignment with approved project scope.
➔ Engaged directly with the project officer and state grant manager to:
◆ Resolve technical issues (including broken document links) ◆ Confirm submission requirements
◆ Clarify next steps related to award acceptance and reporting ➔ Scheduled and participated in touch-base meetings with the state grant manager to align on timelines and deliverables.
➔ Confirmed Council approval status and coordinated outreach regarding formal acceptance documentation.
➔ Reviewed NOFO language and related materials to confirm compliance parameters, including any references to immigration or eligibility considerations. ➔ Held multiple internal CAP strategy sessions to:
◆ Outline grant parameters
◆ Develop a structured work plan
◆ Establish reporting workflows
◆ Assign responsibilities between CAP and City staff
➔ Coordinated closely with the CAP Grants Management Team on:
◆ Documentation tracking
◆ Budget review and potential modifications
◆ Workbook completion
◆ Compliance safeguards
➔ Provided ongoing written recaps and internal updates to ensure cross-team alignment.

WRDA 2024 (Ongoing Project - Post Authorization Activities for $1,902,808) ➔ Initiated outreach to the Sacramento and San Francisco District Offices of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to schedule coordination meetings regarding the authorized WRDA project.
➔ Coordinated directly with the USACE Sacramento Field Office to secure a formal meeting (successfully scheduled for May 5).

Pg 52
52 ➔ Facilitated multiple meetings between the City and USACE to:
◆ Clarify post-authorization steps
◆ Review Work Plan inclusion process
◆ Confirm documentation requirements
◆ Align on timeline and funding pathways
➔ Drafted and circulated meeting agendas for coordination calls (including July 17 and mid-August check-ins).
➔ Sent follow-up summaries and action items after each federal engagement to maintain momentum.
➔ Developed and expanded internal project notes to structure the WRDA Work Plan package.
➔ Drafted and refined the Letter of Intent (LOI), including:
◆ Financial disclosure sections
◆ Capability certifications
◆ Required supporting documentation
➔ Submitted draft LOI to the USACE Program Chief for preliminary review and flagged potential compliance issues.
➔ Reviewed and edited the full Work Plan document prior to submission to the City. ➔ Compiled and prepared the final Work Plan submission package for transmittal. ➔ Confirmed completion and signing of the financial capability documentation by City leadership.
➔ Sent signed WRDA-related correspondence to the offices of Congressman Jay Obernolte and Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff.
➔ Notified Representative Obernolte’s staff of project milestones to ensure ongoing Congressional awareness and support.
➔ Conducted research on post–Work Plan appropriations steps and federal funding sequencing.
➔ Coordinated internal strategy discussions regarding positioning the project for future appropriations cycles.
➔ Conducted research related to WRDA implementation pathways and relevant policy intersections (including Prop 64 considerations where applicable). ➔ Analyzed post–Work Plan submittal procedures within the federal appropriations framework.
➔ Identified alternative USACE points of contact to ensure continued federal access and responsiveness.
➔ Coordinated scheduling among the City Manager, Public Works Director, Engineering Consultant, and USACE officials.
➔ Confirmed submission deadlines and reviewed timeline sequencing for Work Plan inclusion.
➔ Issued internal project updates and follow-up requests to ensure alignment across CAP and City teams.
➔ Drafted and edited multiple correspondence pieces outlining next steps and federal requirements.

Pg 53
53 FY24 Upper Rancho Tract Project - EPA Noncompetitive Application (Ongoing Project for $1,000,000 Award)
➔ Met with the Public Works Director and engineering consultant to review the Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) and assess system deficiencies. ➔ Analyzed historical and current water source capacity, including average and peak daily demand across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. ➔ Conducted a multi-year review of boil water notices, compiling and categorizing incidents to strengthen the project justification and demonstrate system reliability challenges.
➔ Coordinated with engineering staff to confirm which boil water incidents fall within the scope of the Isabella Boulevard project.
➔ Reviewed and edited the Preliminary Engineering Report to enhance clarity, strengthen technical justification, and align with State Water Resources Control Board requirements.
➔ Analyzed the State Water Board’s technical application package to identify required attachments and compliance documentation.
➔ Coordinated with City staff and engineering consultants to gather required materials, including Technical, Managerial, and Financial (TMF) documentation. ➔ Maintained structured internal coordination regarding application goals, timeline, and submission readiness.
➔ Initiated direct communication with the California State Water Resources Control Board to confirm DWSRF funding availability and clarify submission requirements.
➔ Coordinated access to the FAAST (Financial Assistance Application Submittal Tool) portal, including outreach to help desk support to resolve credential issues. ➔ Engaged State Water Board staff to obtain clarification and assistance regarding TMF form requirements and documentation standards.
➔ Continued follow-up with City staff and consultants to finalize required forms and attachments for submission.
➔ Positioned the Isabella Boulevard project for consideration under the DWSRF financing program by strengthening technical documentation and regulatory alignment.

Surface Transportation Reauthorization 2026 (Ongoing Project) ➔ Initiated engagement with congressional staff to begin discussions regarding the Surface Transportation Reauthorization process and anticipated FY26 priorities. ➔ Reviewed notes from recent congressional meetings and developed a comprehensive summary outlining:
◆ Federal engagement status
◆ Committee dynamics
◆ Timing considerations
◆ Recommended next steps
➔ Requested planning meetings with City leadership to align federal strategy with project readiness.

Pg 54
54 ➔ Coordinated scheduling and confirmation of transportation strategy discussions with City staff.
➔ Created and finalized a dedicated Surface Transportation Reauthorization Workbook outlining:
◆ Priority transportation projects
◆ Funding alignment opportunities
◆ Policy relevance
◆ Project readiness considerations
➔ Incorporated DLD review and edits to strengthen strategic framing and federal alignment.
➔ Requested meeting with City leadership to ensure timely submittal of high-quality transportation priorities.
➔ Met with the City’s Engineering Consultant to refine 2026 transportation priorities and confirm technical feasibility (Public Works Director unavailable for meeting). ➔ Drafted and circulated a proposed agenda for transportation strategy discussion; provided to AD for review and input.

Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) - Did Not Pursue ➔ Reviewed the current Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) and prior-year application materials to assess competitiveness, eligibility requirements, and alignment with department priorities.
➔ Developed a preliminary AFG narrative template incorporating relevant content from the City’s 2024 submission to streamline potential development. ➔ Conducted internal evaluation of application scope, required data inputs, and timeline feasibility.
➔ Conducted outreach to California City Fire Department to request operational data required for narrative development, including follow-up communications to ensure readiness for drafting.
➔ Proposed recurring coordination calls to facilitate timely data collection and application planning.
➔ Reviewed previous submissions to identify areas for potential improvement and narrative strengthening.
➔ Provided technical support related to FEMA GO portal navigation to ensure departmental familiarity with system requirements.
➔ Offered guidance on submission protocols and documentation standards in advance of a potential application.

California State Revolving Loan Program (Ongoing Project) ➔ Met with the Public Works Director and engineering consultant to review the Preliminary Engineering Report and assess system deficiencies. ➔ Analyzed historical and current water source capacity, including average and peak daily demand across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. ➔ Conducted a multi-year review of boil water notices, compiling and categorizing incidents to build project justification and demonstrate system reliability challenges.

Pg 55
55 ➔ Coordinated with engineering staff to confirm which boil water incidents fall within the scope of the Isabella Boulevard project.
➔ Reviewed and edited the Preliminary Engineering Report to enhance clarity, strengthen technical justification, and align with State Water Resources Control Board requirements.
➔ Analyzed the State Water Board’s technical application package to identify required attachments and compliance documentation.
➔ Coordinated with City staff and engineering consultants to gather required materials, including Technical, Managerial, and Financial (TMF) documentation. ➔ Maintained structured internal coordination regarding application goals, timeline, and submission readiness.
➔ Initiated direct communication with the California State Water Resources Control Board to confirm DWSRF funding availability and clarify submission requirements.
➔ Coordinated access to the FAAST (Financial Assistance Application Submittal Tool) portal, including outreach to help desk support to resolve credential issues. ➔ Engaged State Water Board staff to obtain clarification and assistance regarding TMF form requirements and documentation standards.
➔ Continued follow-up with City staff and consultants to finalize required forms and attachments for submission.
➔ Positioned the Isabella Boulevard project for consideration under the DWSRF financing program by strengthening technical documentation and regulatory alignment.

Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program - Did Not Pursue ➔ Conducted a detailed review of the Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO), identifying eligibility criteria, scoring factors, required documentation, and planning-focused restrictions.
➔ Extracted and highlighted key requirements for City leadership, including deliverables, reporting expectations, and match considerations. ➔ Developed a structured workbook summarizing program requirements, timelines, and strategic considerations for executive review.
➔ Held internal CAP strategy sessions to assess potential project concepts and determine competitiveness under the planning-only funding framework. ➔ Participated in a joint strategy call (1/9) with City staff to evaluate whether pursuing the grant would meaningfully advance priority infrastructure projects. ➔ Convened a multi-staff CAP and City meeting (including Latisha and Joe) to review grant scope and City priorities.
➔ Conducted research into Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) integration and Level of Service (LOS) considerations.
➔ Analyzed Kern Council of Governments (COG) membership structures and explored potential strategic alignment with Golden Empire Transit and the Joint Planning Policy Board.
➔ Reviewed relevant intersection data and transportation planning components to assess potential competitiveness.
➔ Coordinated internally regarding potential letters of support and strategic Pg 56
56 messaging had the application moved forward.

Federal Advocacy
Federal Facility Research and Advocacy
➔ Initiated outreach to Congressman Jay Obernolte’s office regarding the DHS/Immigration Processing Center located within City limits; met with staff to discuss community impacts, federal oversight, and potential agency coordination, and maintained ongoing communication to share updates and data. ➔ Coordinated and participated in meetings with Senator Alex Padilla’s immigration staff and the Governor’s Office to discuss state-federal alignment, sanctuary jurisdiction implications, detention policy considerations, and municipal impacts.

Prepared agendas, talking points, and briefing materials in advance and provided follow-up summaries after each meeting.
➔ Drafted and distributed the City’s official statement regarding the Immigration Processing Center to key Congressional offices and maintained follow-up communications to reinforce City priorities.
➔ Conducted extensive research on federal detention facilities in California and nationally, including municipal MOUs, oversight structures, media coverage, fire and safety regulations, and emerging state legislation related to for-profit detention centers.
➔ Developed and continuously updated internal background memoranda analyzing immigration enforcement policies, executive orders, proposed federal legislation, and state restrictions on federal contracting related to detention facilities. ➔ Created an engagement strategy timeline, draft congressional outreach language, and a one-pager outlining City concerns and potential policy options for consideration.
➔ Coordinated internally with CAP leadership to align messaging, refine advocacy strategy, and prepare briefing materials for client leadership and congressional meetings.
➔ Facilitated collaboration with CAP scholars and fellows to expand research on detention facility impacts, legislative developments, and comparable jurisdictions nationwide.
➔ Participated in internal and external strategy sessions with City leadership and law enforcement to assess risks, clarify priorities, and determine next steps for state and federal engagement.

Other – General Advocacy, Strategy and Client Coordination ➔ Provided updates and guidance regarding the federal pause on grants, including drafting and distributing templates for outreach to Congressional offices and federal/state program officers.
➔ Conducted consistent outreach to the new City Manager to request meetings, provide updates on ongoing projects, and coordinate discussions on potential community projects and strategic priorities; scheduled and confirmed multiple monthly and in-person meetings.
➔ Prepared and distributed detailed meeting agendas, briefing documents, and Pg 57
57 post-meeting notes for monthly check-ins with the City Manager; participated in internal CAP strategy sessions to align on action items and deliverables. ➔ Conducted exploratory research on senior housing funding opportunities at both the federal and state level, including security system upgrades and housing stock expansion programs; coordinated with the Housing Manager regarding eligibility, waitlist data, and project scope.
➔ Provided analysis and updates on the Homekey+ program and determined the grant was not aligned with the City’s housing profile and homelessness focus requirements.
➔ Reviewed City Council agendas, proceedings, and reports; attended select meetings (including late-night sessions) and shared summaries relevant to CAP-supported initiatives and grant strategy.
➔ Drafted and edited legislative position letters, including support for H.R. 2979 (BUILD Act of 2025), S.1018 (Cybersecurity for Rural Water Systems Act), and letters addressing SNAP and Medicaid funding impacts; coordinated with the City on review and signature.
➔ Prepared a comprehensive memo summarizing all grants and funding awarded to California City through CAP’s efforts.
➔ Conducted research on federal and state housing, HUD, and infrastructure programs aligned with City priorities; monitored relevant legislation through Politico Pro to inform Q1 legislative tracking.
➔ Conducted compliance review of the City’s active federal grants to ensure no flagged DEI-related language posed potential risk under updated federal guidance; shared findings with CAP’s Grants Management Team. ➔ Prepared and finalized a Contract Renewal Extension Addendum (2025–2027 implementation period).
➔ Attended and prepared for meetings with Representative Obernolte’s staff to discuss federal priorities, active grants, Surface Transportation Reauthorization, and Community Project Funding opportunities; developed briefing packets and background materials in advance.
➔ Prepared and distributed staff handouts summarizing the August 7, 2025 Executive Order on Enhancing Oversight of Federal Grantmaking and updated FAR procurement thresholds.
➔ Conducted research on local flooding impacts in California City, including damage scope and potential state and federal recovery funding options. ➔ Facilitated internal CAP strategy discussions to align on deliverables, grant timelines, legislative engagement, and emerging federal policy developments impacting the City.

Funding Opportunities
➔ Identified and shared key federal and state funding opportunities aligned with City priorities across housing, public safety, transportation, infrastructure, and community development.

Pg 58
58 ➔ Flagged major housing and community development programs, including Homeownership Super NOFA, HOME, CDBG, and related state housing initiatives.
➔ Circulated public safety and justice-focused opportunities, including DOJ reentry, crisis response, violence prevention, opioid response, cybercrime enforcement, and school violence programs.
➔ Provided transportation and infrastructure opportunities, including ATP Cycle 8, Caltrans FTA 5310, ORLP, LWCF, BRIC, and Rural & Tribal Assistance programs.
➔ Drafted concise backgrounders outlining eligibility, match requirements, competitiveness, timelines, and strategic fit for priority grants such as Cannabis Equity, Operation Stonegarden (OPSG), ATP, FTA 5310, and CDBG. ➔ Conducted eligibility assessments and initial competitiveness reviews to help departments determine whether to pursue specific opportunities. ➔ Drafted communications to City staff summarizing justice-related and infrastructure-related grant options and recommended next steps. ➔ Conducted periodic funding scans (including Grants.gov review) to identify new and upcoming funding cycles.
➔ Coordinated internal review of state sustainable communities and related funding streams to assess long-term strategic fit.

Hearings/Webinars
➔ Covered Senate and House hearings on housing affordability, HUD oversight, SNAP expansion, child care and workforce participation, biosimilars, and broader economic policy implications for local governments.
➔ Covered multiple immigration and public safety–focused hearings, including sanctuary jurisdictions, ICE operations, federal-state coordination, and law-and-order enforcement strategies; summarized implications for municipalities.
➔ Attended House Transportation and Infrastructure and related hearings on WIFIA, IIJA implementation, hydropower development, and long-term surface transportation policy; extracted key takeaways relevant to City infrastructure planning.
➔ Covered Financial Services Committee hearings on increasing housing supply and federal housing policy reform to inform local development strategies. ➔ Participated in DOJ and OJJDP webinars, including the FY25 COPS Hiring Program (CHP) and violence prevention best practices, to track grant priorities and competitive positioning.
➔ Analyzed state-level funding briefings, including BSCC Prop 47 and Strategic Growth Council Affordable Housing & Sustainable Communities Round 9 updates.
➔ Covered national policy webinars from POLITICO, Bloomberg Government, and The Washington Post on federal appropriations outlook, fiscal fights in Congress, government shutdown dynamics, and political shifts affecting advocacy strategy.

Pg 59
59 ➔ Attended and summarized topical webinars such as AI policy developments, gun violence impacts on children, and California’s statewide policy agenda (climate, housing, healthcare, tech regulation, and labor).
➔ Prepared internal briefing documents summarizing key data points, Q&A materials, and actionable implications for clients, including a Future of Health Policy briefing and multiple appropriations updates.
➔ Organized and synthesized hearing and webinar content into concise policy updates for incorporation into client strategy discussions, legislative trackers, and monthly briefings.

Pg 60
60 CC 3
4898-7406-7085 v1

SUCCESSOR AGENCY

AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Members of the Successor Agency Board (City Council) FROM: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: 1) Adoption of a Successor Agency Resolution Declaring Certain Property Owned by the Successor Agency to be Exempt Surplus Land Pursuant to the Surplus Land Act Because it is not Necessary for the Successor Agency’s Agency Use and the Successor Agency Desires to Transfer Such Property to the County of Kern as a Local Agency to Agency Transfer Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(D) and Section 103(c)(5) of the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s Updated Surplus Land Act Guidelines; Finding that Such Declaration is Exempt from Environmental Review under California Environmental Quality Act; and Taking Related Actions; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Grant Deed for the Property Transferring it to Kern County
BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

The City Council of the City of California City serves as the governing board of the Successor Agency to the City of California City Redevelopment Agency. The Successor Agency owns a property with Assessor’s Parcel No. 205-330-04-00-1 and located at 20890 Hacienda Blvd, California City, CA 93505 (“Property”). The Property was utilized by the City of California City as a fire station for its Fire Department. However, the City has and/or is in the process of transitioning the Fire Department into the Kern County Fire Department so that fire protection services for the City will be provided by the Kern County Fire Department.

Because of this transition, the Successor Agency no longer requires the use of the Property and desires to transfer the Property to Kern County for the County’s continued use thereof as a fire station. However, the Surplus Land Act requires the Successor Agency to declare the Property as surplus and to follow certain procedures prior to disposition, such as offering the Property to residential developers. However, the Successor Agency would not be required to follow those procedures if the Property is also declared “exempt surplus”.

One exemption that is applicable is a local agency to agency transfer where a property is transferred from one public agency to another public agency for the latter agency’s use pursuant to Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(D) and Section 103(c)(5) of Department of Housing and Community Development’s Surplus Land Act Guidelines.

Pg 61
61 CC 3
4898-7406-7085 v1
In order to utilize this exemption, the Successor Agency would have to declare the Property as “exempt surplus” at a public meeting as supported by facts. The attached Resolution, if adopted, would accomplish this result. After making this declaration, the Resolution and supporting documentation will need to be submitted to the Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) at least 30 days prior to transferring the Property to the County. If HCD does not object to this declaration, then the Property may be transferred to the County for fire station purposes.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None with this action. The value of the fire station and property was integrated in the fire services contract with Kern County resulting in reduce costs to the City during the initial years of the agreement.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council, acting as the Successor Agency Board, adopt the resolution and authorize the City Manager to execute the grant deed.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution 26-3226
Grant Deed
Pg 62
62 4910-2752-8605 v1
RESOLUTION NO. 3226

A RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

CALIFORNIA CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DECLARING

CERTAIN PROPERTY OWNED BY THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO BE

EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND PURSUANT TO THE SURPLUS LAND ACT
BECAUSE IT IS NOT NECESSARY FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY’S

AGENCY USE AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY DESIRES TO

TRANSFER SUCH PROPERTY TO THE COUNTY OF KERN AS A

LOCAL AGENCY TO AGENCY TRANSFER PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54221(F)(1)(D) AND SECTION
103(C)(5) OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT’S UPDATED SURPLUS LAND ACT
GUIDELINES; FINDING THAT SUCH DECLARATION IS EXEMPT

FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; AND TAKING RELATED ACTIONS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of California City serves as the governing board of the Successor Agency to the City of California City Redevelopment Agency (“Agency”); and
WHEREAS, the Agency owns that certain property with Assessor’s Parcel No. 205-330-04-00-1 and located at 20890 Hacienda Blvd, California City, CA 93505, as described further in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (“Property””); and WHEREAS, under the Surplus Land Act, Government Code Sections 54220- 54233 (“Act”), surplus land is land owned by the Agency for which the Agency Board takes formal action in a regular public meeting declaring the land is surplus and not necessary for the Agency’s use; and
WHEREAS, the Act provides that such land shall be declared either surplus land or exempt surplus land before the Agency may take action to dispose of it consistent with the Agency’s policies or procedures; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, land is necessary for the Agency’s “agency use” if the land is being used, or is planned to be used pursuant to a written plan adopted by the Agency Board, for Agency work or operations; and
WHEREAS, under the Act, land is exempt surplus property if it is surplus land that is to be transferred pursuant to Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(D) and Section 103(c)(5) of the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s Updated Surplus Land Act Guidelines (“SLA Guidelines”); and WHEREAS, Section 104(a) of the SLA Guidelines further provide that “agency’s use” includes, but is not limited to, “land that is being used for agency work or operations, land that a local agency plans to use for agency work or operations Pg 63
63 4910-2752-8605 v1
pursuant to a written plan adopted by the local agency’s governing board, or land that is disposed of for agency work or operations”; and
WHEREAS, the Property is designated as governmental use and was previously used as a fire station for the City of California City’s Fire Department; and WHEREAS, the City of California City has transitioned its Fire Department to the County of Kern such that the County of Kern will provide fire protection services to the City and the County of Kern desires to continue using the Property as a fire station; and WHEREAS, based upon the forgoing, the Property is no longer necessary for the Agency’s agency use; and
WHEREAS, the Agency desires to transfer the Property to the County of Kern pursuant to Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(D) and Section 103(c)(5) of the SLA Guidelines such that the County of Kern may continue utilizing the Property as a fire station; and
WHEREAS, because the County of Kern will be providing fire protection services to the City, County of Kern desires to accept the Property for the purposes of a fire station; and
WHEREAS, in declaring the Property as exempt surplus land as described above, the Agency considered all oral and written testimony presented at the April 14, 2026, Agency meeting, including, but not limited to, oral and written staff reports and oral and written testimony from members of the public.

NOW THEREFORE, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CALIFORNIA CITY

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DOES HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, RESOLVES, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct, and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. Designation of the Property as exempt surplus does not have the potential for creating a significant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt from further review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) because it is not a project as defined by the CEQA Guidelines Section 15378. Adoption of the Resolution does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. If and when the Property is sold to a purchaser and that purchaser proposes a use for the Property that requires a discretionary permit and CEQA review, that future use and project will be analyzed at the appropriate time in accordance with CEQA.

SECTION 3. The City Council makes the following findings:
(a) None of the characteristics listed under Government Code Section Pg 64
64 4910-2752-8605 v1
54221(f)(2), apply to the Property. The Property is not:
(i) Within a coastal zone.
(ii) Adjacent to a historical unit of the State Parks System. (iii) Listed on, or determined by the State Office of Historic Preservation to be eligible for, the National Register of Historic Places. (iv) Within the Lake Tahoe region as defined in Government Code Section 66905.5.
(b) The Property is no longer necessary for the Agency’s use within the meaning of the term “agency’s use” as defined by the Act. (c) The Agency desires to transfer the Property to the County of Kern and the County of Kern desires to accept the Property for the County of Kern’s agency use of a fire station because the County of Kern is or will be providing fire protection services to the City of California City.

SECTION 4. Based upon the forgoing, the Agency hereby declares that the Property, as described and depicted in Exhibits A and B, is exempt surplus land for the purposes of the Act, because the Property is no longer necessary for the Agency’s “agency’s use” as defined by the Act and the Agency desires to transfer the Property to Kern County for its “agency’s use” of a fire station pursuant to and in compliance with Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(D) and Section 103(c)(5) of SLA Guidelines.

SECTION 5. The City Manager, acting as the Agency’s Executive Director, and his or her designee, is hereby authorized to do all things which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution in a manner consistent with the Act, and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified and confirmed.

SECTION 6. The Agency Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the Book of Resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________________
Marquette E. Hawkins
Pg 65
65 4910-2752-8605 v1
Chair
ATTEST:
_________________________________
John Paul Maier, MBA, MMC
Successor Agency Secretary
Pg 66
66 4910-2752-8605 v1

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF

CALIFORNIA CITY, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOT 6 OF TRACT 5634 IN THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED JUNE 25, 1993 IN BOOK 40, PAGES 128 AND 129 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 OF ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER

MINERALS CONTAINED WITHIN SAID PROPERTY, WHETHER NOW KNOWN TO

EXIST OR HEREAFTER DISCOVERED, AS RESERVED BY M & R SHEEP COMPANY, A CO PARTNERSHIP COMPOSED OF G. MENDIBURU AND OSCAR RUDNICK, IN DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 1956 IN BOOK 2707, PAGE 540 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH DEED PROVIDES AS FOLLOWS:
"TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO PRODUCE, MINE, EXTRACT AND REMOVE OIL,

GAS AND OTHER MINERALS UPON, FROM AND THROUGH SAID PROPERTY, BUT UNLESS FREMONT VALLEY LAND, INC., A CORPORATION, ITS

SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, SHALL GIVE WRITTEN CONSENT TO THE

DRILLING OF WELLS UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND, ALL OF THE

FOREGOING RIGHTS SHALL BE EXERCISED ONLY BY THE DRILLING OF WELLS

OR CONDUCTING OPERATIONS IN, TO AND THROUGH SAID PROPERTY AT DEPTHS BELOW 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE AND FROM LOCATIONS ON

ADJACENT OR NEIGHBORING LANDS, AND IN SUCH MANNER AS TO NOT DISTURB THE SURFACE OF THE FIRST 500 FEET OF THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID

PROPERTY OR ANY OF THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE SURFACE THEREOF."
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 OF ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER

MINERALS CONTAINED WITHIN SAID PROPERTY, WHETHER NOW KNOWN TO

EXIST OR HEREAFTER DISCOVERED, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO

PRODUCE, MINE, EXTRACT AND REMOVE OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERALS

UPON, FROM AND THROUGH SAID PROPERTY, AS EXCEPTED AND RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM PAUL S. THOMAS AND ESTHER MAY THOMAS, HUSBAND AND WIFE; HAROLD E. THOMAS AND BLANCHE EVELYN THOMAS, HUSBAND AND WIFE; AND LOIS M. RALLS, A MARRIED WOMAN, RECORDED MARCH 25, 1957 IN BOOK 2753, PAGE 33 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH DEED PROVIDES

THAT UNLESS GRANTEE, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, SHALL GIVE

WRITTEN CONSENT TO THE DRILLING OF WELLS UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID

LAND, ALL OF THE FOREGOING RIGHTS SHALL BE EXERCISED ONLY BY THE

DRILLING OF WELLS OR CONDUCTING OPERATIONS INTO AND THROUGH SAID PROPERTY AT DEPTHS BELOW 500 FEET FROM LOCATIONS ON ADJACENT OR Pg 67
67 4910-2752-8605 v1

NEIGHBORING LANDS, IN SUCH MANNER AS NOT TO DISTURB THE SURFACE (OR THE FIRST 500 FEET OF THE SUB-SURFACE) OF SAID PROPERTY OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED UPON THE SURFACE THEREOF.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM 1/4 OF ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERALS

BUT WITHOUT THE RIGHT TO ENTER ANY PORTIONS OF SAID LAND LYING ABOVE A DEPTH OF 500 FEET BELOW THE SURFACE THEREOF, IN AND UNDER

SAID LAND, AS GRANTED TO CALIFORNIA CITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, TRUSTEE, IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 26, 1959 IN BOOK 3183, PAGE 296 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

Tax Account No(s): 205-330-04-00-1
Pg 68
68 4910-2752-8605 v1

EXHIBIT B

PROPERTY DEPICTION
Pg 69
69 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND FOR:

County of Kern
Property Management
1115 Truxtun Avenue, 3rd Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301
No recording fee required: exempt pursuant to
Government Code Section 27383.

Government agency acquiring title - exempt from Documentary Transfer Tax per R&T Code 11922.

GC 27388.l(a)(l): Recorded document is expressly
exempted from payment of recording fees (FBO govt. agency).

The undersigned Grantor(s) declare(s) that the DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS: $ _0 County $ City
____ Computed on the consideration or value of property conveyed; ____ Computed on the consideration or value less encumbrance remaining at time of sale.

X_ Grantee is Exempt Gov’t Agency (Gov’t Code Sec. 27383) Space above line for Recorder’s Use
APNs: 205-330-04

GRANT DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the CITY OF

CALIFORNIA CITY AS THE SUCCESSOR TO THE DISSOLVED REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, a body corporate and politic (“Grantor”), hereby grants to the COUNTY OF KERN, a political subdivision of the State of California (“Grantee”), the property located in the County of Kern, State of California, legally described on the attached Exhibit “A”.

Dated: ____________________, 2026 COUNTY OF KERN

By _______________________________________
Sean Grayson
City Manager

Pg 70
70 EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF

CALIFORNIA CITY, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOT 6 OF TRACT 5634 IN THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED JUNE 25, 1993 IN BOOK 40, PAGES 128 AND 129 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 OF ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER

MINERALS CONTAINED WITHIN SAID PROPERTY, WHETHER NOW KNOWN TO

EXIST OR HEREAFTER DISCOVERED, AS RESERVED BY M & R SHEEP COMPANY, A CO PARTNERSHIP COMPOSED OF G. MENDIBURU AND OSCAR RUDNICK, IN DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 1956 IN BOOK 2707, PAGE 540 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH DEED PROVIDES AS FOLLOWS:
"TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO PRODUCE, MINE, EXTRACT AND REMOVE OIL,

GAS AND OTHER MINERALS UPON, FROM AND THROUGH SAID PROPERTY, BUT UNLESS FREMONT VALLEY LAND, INC., A CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND

ASSIGNS, SHALL GIVE WRITTEN CONSENT TO THE DRILLING OF WELLS UPON THE

SURFACE OF SAID LAND, ALL OF THE FOREGOING RIGHTS SHALL BE EXERCISED

ONLY BY THE DRILLING OF WELLS OR CONDUCTING OPERATIONS IN, TO AND THROUGH SAID PROPERTY AT DEPTHS BELOW 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE AND

FROM LOCATIONS ON ADJACENT OR NEIGHBORING LANDS, AND IN SUCH MANNER AS TO NOT DISTURB THE SURFACE OF THE FIRST 500 FEET OF THE

SUBSURFACE OF SAID PROPERTY OR ANY OF THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE SURFACE THEREOF."
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 OF ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER

MINERALS CONTAINED WITHIN SAID PROPERTY, WHETHER NOW KNOWN TO

EXIST OR HEREAFTER DISCOVERED, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO PRODUCE,

MINE, EXTRACT AND REMOVE OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERALS UPON, FROM AND

THROUGH SAID PROPERTY, AS EXCEPTED AND RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM PAUL S. THOMAS AND ESTHER MAY THOMAS, HUSBAND AND WIFE; HAROLD E.

THOMAS AND BLANCHE EVELYN THOMAS, HUSBAND AND WIFE; AND LOIS M.

RALLS, A MARRIED WOMAN, RECORDED MARCH 25, 1957 IN BOOK 2753, PAGE 33

OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH DEED PROVIDES THAT UNLESS GRANTEE, ITS

SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, SHALL GIVE WRITTEN CONSENT TO THE DRILLING OF

WELLS UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND, ALL OF THE FOREGOING RIGHTS

SHALL BE EXERCISED ONLY BY THE DRILLING OF WELLS OR CONDUCTING OPERATIONS INTO AND THROUGH SAID PROPERTY AT DEPTHS BELOW 500 FEET

FROM LOCATIONS ON ADJACENT OR NEIGHBORING LANDS, IN SUCH MANNER AS NOT TO DISTURB THE SURFACE (OR THE FIRST 500 FEET OF THE SUB-SURFACE) OF Pg 71
71 SAID PROPERTY OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED UPON THE SURFACE THEREOF.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM 1/4 OF ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERALS BUT

WITHOUT THE RIGHT TO ENTER ANY PORTIONS OF SAID LAND LYING ABOVE A DEPTH OF 500 FEET BELOW THE SURFACE THEREOF, IN AND UNDER SAID LAND,

AS GRANTED TO CALIFORNIA CITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, TRUSTEE, IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 26, 1959 IN BOOK 3183, PAGE 296 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

Pg 72
72 CC 4
4898-7406-7085 v1

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Governing Body Resolution, Approving the City Manager or Deputy City Manager to Serve as the Authorized Agent for the City in Relation to the Fiscal Year 22/23 State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program (SLCGP)
BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

On May 27, 2025, the City Council adopted a “governing body” resolution provided by the California Officer of Emergency Services (OES) as part of their subgrantee of a Department of Homeland Security State & Local Cybersecurity Grant Program. The City has been awarded $250,000 for cybersecurity and IT costs. The previously adopted resolution authorized the City Manager by name to administer the grant as the authorized agent of the City. The named City Manager is no longer employed by the City and because the resolution specifies a name, the Interim City Manager is not authorized to administer the grant as the authorized agent. The included resolution updates the authorized agent naming the City Manager or Deputy City Manager by title but not by name to serve as the authorized agent on behalf of the City. Once approved the resolution will be transmitted to OES and the City will pursue executing the grant.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None with this action. Award of the cybersecurity and IT contract will come before the City Council in a future action and the funds are subject to reimbursement from the grant once expended.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution approving authorized agents for the SLCGP.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution 26-3227 Governing Body
Pg 73
73 Governing Body Resolution

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE
(Governing Body)

OF THE THAT
(Name of Applicant)
, OR
(Name or Title of Authorized Agent)
, OR
(Name or Title of Authorized Agent)
,
(Name or Title of Authorized Agent)
is hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf of the named Applicant, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, any actions necessary for the purpose of obtaining federal financial assistance provided by the federal Department of Homeland Security and subgranted through the State of California for the following Grant Award:
, 20
I, , duly appointed and
(Name)
Of the
(Title) (Governing Body)
do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution passed and approved by the
day of ,20
(Official Position)
(Signature) (Date)
Mayor and City Council
City of California City
City Manager
Fiscal Year 22/23 State & Local Cybersecurity Grant Program (SLCGP) (List Grant Year and Program)
Passed and approved this 14th day of April
Certification
26 Marquette Hawkins
Mayor California City City Council
Deputy City Manager
California City City Council
fourteenth April 26
John P. Maier / City Clerk
Interim/Acting City Manager
Pg 74
74 CC 5
4898-7406-7085 v1

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: 1) Adopt a Resolution to Approve an Attorney-Client Fee Agreement with the Law Offices of Veronica M. Aguilar, A.P.C. to Represent the SDI Advisory Committee and its Members Using SDI Funds; 2) Authorize the Initial Deposit in the Amount of $10,000 to be Paid From the SDI Fund; and 3) Authorize the City Manager to Process Billing Under the Agreement as Pre-Issue Not Requiring Council Approval for Payment Issuance
BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

On December 22, 2025 the City Council directed staff work with the SDI Advisory Committee for the consideration of an agreement for legal representation of the SDI Advisory Committee and its members. The SDI Advisory Committee submitted the attached Attorney-Client Fee Agreement with the Law Offices of Veronica M. Aguilar, A.P.C.to meet this direction. The attached resolution would approve the agreement. The agreement is not in effect until the $10,000 deposit is provided to the firm. In this action the City Council is requested to authorize the initial deposit to be paid from the SDI Fund to the firm. In this action the City Council is also requested to authorize the City Manager to process billing under the agreement as pre-issue which would not require further City Council approval for payment issuance.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The $10,000 deposit and future billables related to the contract will be processed by staff and paid from the SDI Fund.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve the agreement, authorize the initial deposit and authorize the City Manager to process payment as pre-issue.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution 26-3228
Attorney-Client Fee Agreement
Pg 75
75 RESOLUTION 26-3228

A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY AUTHORIZING THE SDI
ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO EXECUTE AN ATTORNEYCLIENT FEE AGREEMENT WITH VERONICA M. AGUILAR, A.P.C. TO PROVIDE LEGAL REPRESENTATION TO THE SDI

ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND ITS MEMBERS USING SDI
FUNDS
WHEREAS, on December 22, 2025, directed staff work with the SDI Committee for the consideration of an agreement for legal representation of the SDI Advisory Committee and its members.; and
WHEREAS, the SDI Advisory Committee has reviewed, interviewed, and selected the Law Offices of Veronica M. Aguilar, A.P.C., as the most qualified law firm to represent the SDI Advisory Committee and its members; and Robbie Cordes and John Elmes, on behalf of the SDI Advisory Committee, executed an Attorney-Client Fee Agreement with Veronica M. Aguilar, A.P.C. dated March 27, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council have previously provided direction to establish an agreement for legal representation of the SDI Advisory Committee and its members; and
WHEREAS, City desires to authorize the SDI Advisory Committee to enter into an Attorney-Client Fee Agreement with Veronica M. Aguilar, A.P.C., for legal representation of the SDI Advisory Committee and its members.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, CALIFORNIA AS FOLLOWS:

1. Robbie Cordes and John Elmes, as responsible parties for the SDI Advisory Committee, are hereby authorized to execute an Attorney-Client Fee Agreement with Veronica M. Aguilar, A.P.C., for legal representation of the SDI Advisory Committee and its members

2. The SDI fund will pay for the cost of the legal representation should the SDI Advisory Committee determine to move forward with Veronica M. Aguilar, A.P.C.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of California City, this 14th day of April 2026.

AYES:

NOES:

Pg 76
76 RESOLUTION 26-3228

ABSENT:

DATED: April 14, 2026
__________________________
Dr. Marquette E. Hawkins, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________ __________________________
John Paul Maier, City Clerk Victor M. Ponto, City Attorney

Pg 77
77 Pg 78
78 Pg 79
79 Pg 80
80 Pg 81
81 Pg 82
82 Pg 83
83 CC 7
4898-7406-7085 v1

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Accept $50,000 in Donated Funds and Authorize the City Manager to Approve Expenditures to Match the Conditioned Use of the Funds BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

Mayor Hawkins had communications with Mr. John Malloy regarding a community donation to fund a 2026 4th of July fireworks show, replacement of basketball hoops at the Stata Center, and funding to open the City’s public pool by Labor Day weekend in 2026.

On March 17, 2026, the City submitted an invoice (attached) for the identified donation. On March 30, 2026, the City provided an assurance letter (attached) for the use of the donated funds which the City is obligated to follow for expenditure from the donated funds. The letter includes the following conditions:
• The Donation will be used exclusively to fund the 2026 City fireworks display, improvements to the Strata Center basketball court, and opening the Central Park swimming pool, and similar events that benefit the community and for no other purpose. • The City is legally permitted to accept monetary donations from third parties, including for-profit corporations, for sponsorship of these events. • No portion of the Donation will be used, directly or indirectly, to provide a personal benefit to any City employee or elected official or their immediate family members. • CoreCivic will not receive any unfair advantage or preferential treatment from the City with respect to any City contract or other official act as a result of this Donation.

This action would allow the city to accept the donated funds and to authorize the expenditure of the funds as conditioned.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This action will authorize the acceptance of $50,000 in donations and the expenditure of the funds based on their conditioned use.

Pg 84
84 CC 7
4898-7406-7085 v1
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council accept the donated funds and authorize the City Manager to approve the needed expenditures.

ATTACHMENTS:

Donation Invoice
Donation Assurance Letter
Pg 85
85 4914-0910-7596 v1

CITY HALL
21000 Hacienda Blvd.

California City, CA 93505
______________________________________
760-373-8661
www.californiacity-ca.gov
Marquette Hawkins
MAYOR
Jim Creighton

MAYOR PRO TEM
Della Clark
Ronald Smith

COUNCIL MEMBERS
__________________
Sean Grayson
INTERIM CITY MANAGER March 17, 2026
Sent Via Email
John Malloy
CoreCivic
[email protected]
RE: Invoice for Donation to the City of California City Dear Mr. Malloy:

Thank you for your time spent discussing with Mayor Hawkins a donation of $50,000 from CoreCivic to the City of California City. We request the transmission of funds via check at your earliest convenience. Checks may be mailed to 21000 Hacienda Blvd. California City, CA 93505. As discussed, the use of the funds is intended to benefit the entire community and surrounding areas through the following:

Funding of a City Fireworks Show
The City did not have a 4th of July fireworks show in 2025. Nearly half of the funds will be used to bring the fireworks show back to the community and those that live, work, visit, play, and thrive in California City.

Basketball court in the Strata Center
The basketball court at the Strata Center is in need of long ago deferred maintenance and repair cycles. A local non-profit has worked with the City to bring a basketball league to the Strata Center. Basketball court improvements such as new hoops will provide a better recreation opportunity for casual users and an improved environment for the basketball league.

Funding to open the Swimming Pool in Central Park by Memorial Day of 2026 In 2025 the City did not open the pool until well into the new fiscal year which began July 1, 2025. The City owned swimming pool is an essential resource for safe recreation and to get out of the ever present heat brought upon the City late Spring through Fall.

This letter serves a payable invoice for the above-mentioned funds. Please let me know what else you need on this matter. I am available by return email at any time.

Respectfully Submitted,
Sean Grayson
Interim City Manager
Pg 86
86 4914-0910-7596 v1

CITY HALL
21000 Hacienda Blvd.

California City, CA 93505
______________________________________
760-373-8661
www.californiacity-ca.gov
Marquette Hawkins
MAYOR
Jim Creighton

MAYOR PRO TEM
Della Clark
Ronald Smith

COUNCIL MEMBERS
__________________
Sean Grayson

INTERIM CITY MANAGER
March 30, 2026
CoreCivic
Attn: Jamie Bishop
5501 Virginia Way, Suite 110
Brentwood, TN 37027
Subject: Assurance Letter – Use of Donated Funds
To Whom It May Concern:

The City of California City (the “City”) understands that you are making a donation to the City based on your understanding that your funds (the “Donation”) will not be used in ways that may violate applicable federal, state or local laws. In order to assure you that your donation to the City will be used in a manner that is consistent with applicable law, the City hereby represents to you as follows:
• The Donation will be used exclusively to fund the 2026 City fireworks display, improvements to the Strata Center basketball court, and opening the Central Park swimming pool, and similar events that benefit the community and for no other purpose.
• The City is legally permitted to accept monetary donations from third parties, including for-profit corporations, for sponsorship of these events.
• No portion of the Donation will be used, directly or indirectly, to provide a personal benefit to any City employee or elected official or their immediate family members. • CoreCivic will not receive any unfair advantage or preferential treatment from the City with respect to any City contract or other official act as a result of this Donation.

Finally, the undersigned is a representative of the City who is authorized to make the representations and warranties herein.

Respectfully Submitted,
Sean Grayson
Interim City Manager
Pg 87
87 CC 8

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kenny Cooper, Finance Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolutions to 1) Initiate Proceeding for the Levy and Collection of Assessments for Aspen Mall Landscape and Lighting District; 2) Preliminary Approval of the Engineer’s Report for the Levy and Collection of Assessments; 3) Declaring Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments with Input Requested at a Public Hearing on May 12, 2026
BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

Attached are the Fiscal Year 26/27 Engineer’s Annual Levy Report and three (3) resolutions that allow the City of California City to levy and collect assessments for the Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District. This also sets the date for a public hearing to be held on May 12, 2026. This is an annual requirement that pays for the parking lot lighting and landscape maintenance at Aspen Mall. The fund is budgeted to earn $32,000 annually and pays for the common area line, water, and landscaping wall.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Proceeds from the FY26/27 AMMADA Assessments will be allocated to Fund 71-3445 totaling $32,000.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt the resolutions as presented.

ATTACHMENTS:

FY26-27 Engineer’s Annual Levy Report
Resolution No. XXXXX
Resolution No. XXXXX
Resolution No. XXXXX
Pg 88
88 27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T 951.587.3500 | 800.755.6864
F 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com

City of California City

Aspen Mall Landscaping and
Lighting District

2026/2027 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT

Intent Meeting: April 14, 2026
Public Hearing: May 12, 2026
Pg 89
89 ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
for
Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District
City of California City
Kern County, State of California
This Report and the enclosed diagrams showing the exterior boundaries of the District; and any relevant zones therein identify the District Boundaries as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Kern County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.

Dated this ____________ day of ______________, 2026.

Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of the City of California City
By: ________________________
Chonney Gano, Project Manager
District Administration Services
By: ________________________________
Tyrone Peter
P. E. # C 81888
Pg 90
90 TABLE OF CONTENTS
____________________________________________________________________ I. OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 1 A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 B. COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ........................................ 1 C. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT AND SERVICES .......................................... 2 D. AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES (PURSUANT TO THE 1972 ACT) ............................................................................................................................ 3 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ........................................................................... 4 III. DISTRICT BUDGET ................................................................................................. 9 APPENDIX A — DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ............................................... 10 APPENDIX B — 2026/2027 COLLECTION ROLL ....................................................... 13 _____________________________________________________________________ Pg 91
91 2026/2027 City of California City, Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District Page 1 I. OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of California City (“City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to maintain the improvements within the Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District (“District”), pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”). The District was formed in 1995 and provides funding for services required to maintain landscaping and lighting improvements and associated appurtenances located within the District boundaries.

This Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (“Report”) describes the District, any changes to the District and the proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/2027. The proposed assessments are based on the estimated cost to maintain the improvements that provide a special benefit to properties within the District. The District budget identifies the estimated expenditures, deficits, surpluses, revenues, and fund balances used to calculate the annual assessment for properties within the District. Each parcel within the District is assessed proportionately for those improvements provided by the District from which the parcel receives special benefit.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Kern County Assessor’s Office. The Kern County Auditor/Controller uses APNs and specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties assessed for special district benefit assessments.

Following consideration of public comments and written protests at a Public Hearing, the City Council (“Council”) shall review the Report and may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the assessments, the Council may order the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 pursuant to the 1972 Act and as outlined in the approved Report. In such case, the assessment information will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax roll for each parcel in Fiscal Year 2026/2027.

B. COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, which established specific, substantive and procedural requirements for assessments.

These provisions are now defined in the California State Constitution under Article XIIID, Section 4 (“Article XIIID”).

In Fiscal Year 1997/1998, the City initiated and conducted property owner protest ballot proceedings for the District in compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements of Article XIIID. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing Pg 92
92 2026/2027 City of California City, Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District Page 2 on July 1, 1997, property owner ballots returned were tabulated. The tabulation of the ballots indicated that the property owners approved the special benefit assessment for maintaining the improvements within the District. Although the actual assessment amount approved by each property owner varied with their proportionate benefits, the assessment amount approved by the property owners within the District is based on a maximum assessment rate of $4,652.28 per Benefit Unit Factor (see Section II, Method of Apportionment, for details).

C. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT AND SERVICES
In an effort to enhance and improve the properties, business opportunities and the appearance of the area known as the Aspen Mall, the City’s Redevelopment Agency provided funds for the renovation and capital improvement of the parking lot and landscaped areas related to this commercial business center. In conjunction with this renovation, the District was formed to provide for and ensure the continued maintenance of the improvements after the initial installation and renovation was completed.

The District provides for the maintenance, servicing, operation and administration of landscape and lighting improvements and associated appurtenances located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the District boundaries. Improvements may include but are not limited to: turf, ground cover, shrubs, trees, drainage systems, irrigation systems, lighting, hardscape and associated appurtenances within the public right-of-ways and specific easements.

These improvements include necessary service, operation, administration and maintenance required to keep the above-mentioned improvements in satisfactory condition.

Services provided include operations, administration and maintenance, including necessary labor, material and equipment. These services may include but are not limited to: repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of the improvements; removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; cleaning, sandblasting and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti; and providing for the growth, health and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or damage.

The District consists of the parcels located within the area known as the Aspen Mall, located south of California City Boulevard, north of Bay Avenue, west of 82nd Street and east of Neuralia Road.

The parcels within the District are assessed proportionately for the costs associated with the improvements and services provided through the District that provides a special benefit to each parcel assessed, utilizing the method of apportionment described in Section II of this Report.

Pg 93
93 2026/2027 City of California City, Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District Page 3 D. AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES (PURSUANT TO THE 1972 ACT)
As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
 The installation or planting of landscaping.
 The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
 The installation or construction of public lighting facilities.  The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities.
 The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing.  The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
 The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment;
 The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and mailing of notices;
 Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments;  Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services;  Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
 Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5.
 Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
 Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.

Pg 94
94 2026/2027 City of California City, Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District Page 4  Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
 The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste.  The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Pursuant to the 1972 Act, the costs of the District may be apportioned by any formula or method that fairly distributes the net amount to be assessed among the assessable parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such parcel from the improvements. The benefit formula used for any District should reflect the composition of the parcels and improvements and the services provided, to fairly proportion the costs based on special benefit to each parcel.

The costs associated with the improvements are equitably spread among benefiting parcels within the District, utilizing the method of apportionment described in this Section. The funds collected shall be dispersed and used for only the improvements and services provided within the District.

Each parcel within the District, and the businesses associated with those properties, receive special and distinct benefits from the improvements and activities to be funded through the District assessments. Among the special benefits received by each assessed parcel are increased business opportunities, increased security, aesthetic enhancements of the area and properties and enhanced perception by patrons.

The special benefits of lighting within the District are the convenience, safety and security of property, improvements and goods. Specifically:
 Enhanced deterrence of crime and the aid to police protection.  Increased nighttime safety for patrons and employees.  Improved visibility for pedestrians and motorists.
 Improved ingress and egress to property.
 Reduced vandalism and other criminal acts and damage to improvements or property.
 Enhanced aesthetic appeal of the parking area and the properties that are associated with the parking area.
 Increased promotion of business activities and opportunities during nighttime hours.

Pg 95
95 2026/2027 City of California City, Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District Page 5 The special benefits associated with landscaped areas within the District are specifically:
 Improved aesthetic appeal of the parking area and nearby parcels.  Improved dust control.
 Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment.
 Improved traffic circulation and parking facilities.
 A positive representation of the businesses within the District.

The preceding special benefits contribute to a special enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the District.

It has been determined that the on-going operation and maintenance of the District improvements provide no measurable general benefit to other properties outside the District or directly to the public at large. Therefore, the District improvements and the corresponding assessments have been identified as 100% special benefit to parcels within the District in compliance with the substantive requirements of Article XIIID.

The parcels assessed within the District, share in both the cost and the benefits of the improvements. A Benefit Unit Factor (“BUF”) is assigned to each parcel based upon three (3) criteria: current land use, location and associated parcel acreage.

Land Use
Each parcel is given a weighting factor known as a Development Unit Factor (“DUF”), based on the current land use of the parcel. Within the District, four (4) different land use classifications have been identified. Table I lists the four (4) land use classifications along with the DUF applied to each classification:

Table I
Parcel Land Use Classifications
Land Use Classification
Total
Parcels
Development
Unit Factor
Commercial Developed 22 1.0000
Commercial Vacant 4 0.5000
Exempt 5 0.0000
Commercial Condominium 19 0.0526
The Development Unit Factor for the nineteen commercial condominium units is based on 1.0 DUF/19 Units = 0.0526
Pg 96
96 2026/2027 City of California City, Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District Page 6 Each parcel is assigned a DUF based on the parcel’s current development (land use). Similar parcels are given a similar weighting factor.

Upon review of all the properties within the District boundary, it has been determined that five (5) parcels should not be assessed and are identified as “Exempt”. These five parcels (203-090-22, 203-090-23, 203-090-30, 203-090-38 and 203-420-01) are non-commercial properties, common areas or possessory interests associated with other parcels within the District. It has been determined that these parcels have little or no utilization of the parking lot and the associated District improvements and do not receive the special benefits that other properties within the District receive from the improvements.

One of the parcels identified as “Exempt” (203-420-01) is a (0.29-acre) common area associated with the nineteen (19) parcels identified as commercial condominiums. These nineteen commercial condominiums actually make up a single commercial building on the common area lot. However, when a parcel map was filed with the County, nineteen separate and distinct APNs were assigned; one for each of the original nineteen suites or units. Since the time the original APNs were assigned by the County, some of the suites (units) have been combined, but the proportional benefit to each parcel is unchanged and property owners whose office or suite encompasses more than one APN receive multiple tax bills. Therefore, the apportionment of special benefit and assessment is based on the original APNs, not the number of actual suites constructed.

Location
In addition to the Development Unit Factor assigned to each parcel for calculating a parcel’s benefit, the location of the parcel within the District has been taken into consideration. After evaluation of the District improvements by City staff, and consideration of property owner’s concerns, a Location Differential Factor (“LDF”) has been applied to parcels based on their location and proximity to the overall improvements. Those parcels that front California City Boulevard and/or the main parking lot and landscaped areas are given a Location Differential Factor of one (1.0). The other parcels are given a twenty-five percent (25%) discount or a 0.75 LDF based on their reduced direct visual benefit from the improvements.

Acreage
The final criteria used to calculate a parcel’s benefit is the size (acreage) of the parcel. It has been determined that each parcel’s overall acreage provides a fair and reasonable comparison of property benefit correlating each parcel’s current and potential development, as well as the overall use and benefit from the area of improvement.

The combination of land use, location and parcel size provides a fair and reasonable depiction of each parcel’s special benefit and proportionate Pg 97
97 2026/2027 City of California City, Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District Page 7 assessment. The following formula is used to arrive at each parcel’s benefit referred to as a Benefit Unit Factor (BUF):

Parcel’s DUF x Parcel’s LDF x Parcel’s Acreage = Parcel’s BUF Also stated as:

Development Unit Factor x Location Differential Factor x Acreage = Parcel’s BUF
The total Balance to Levy divided by the total BUF for the District is used to establish a Levy per BUF, as per the following formula:

Total Balance to Levy / Total BUF in the District = Levy per BUF The Levy per BUF multiplied by each parcel’s individual BUF represents the parcel’s levy amount (assessment). The following formula outlines the levy calculation applied to each parcel:

Parcel BUF x Levy per BUF = Parcel Levy Amount
The following table (Table II) provides sample levy calculations for various property types in the District based on the maximum assessment rate per BUF:

Table II
Sample Maximum Levy Calculations
Land Use
Classification
Development
Unit Factor
(DUF)
Location
Differential
Factor (LDF)
Parcel
Acreage
Benefit Unit
Factor (BUF)
Benefit Unit
Factor (BUF)
Maximum
Rate
Maximum
Levy Amount
Commercial Developed 1.0000 X 1.00 x 0.29 = 0.2900 0.2900 x $4,652.28 = $1,349.16 Commercial Developed 1.0000 x 0.75 x 0.29 = 0.2175 0.2175 x $4,652.28 = $1,011.88 Commercial Vacant 0.5000 x 1.00 x 0.29 = 0.1450 0.1450 x $4,652.28 = $674.58 Commercial Vacant 0.5000 x 0.75 x 0.29 = 0.1088 0.1088 x $4,652.28 = $506.18 Exempt 0.0000 x 1.00 x 0.29 = 0.0000 0.0000 x $4,652.28 = $0.00 Commercial Condominiums 0.0526 x 1.00 x 0.29 = 0.0153 0.0153 x $4,652.28 = $71.16

Pg 98
98 2026/2027 City of California City, Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District Page 8 Pursuant to the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID, a maximum assessment rate of $4,652.28 per BUF was approved by the property owners through a protest ballot proceeding in Fiscal Year 1997/1998. The proposed assessment rate calculated each Fiscal Year is based on an estimated budget; and the proposed rate applied each year may be less than or equal to the maximum rate. A proposed assessment rate, greater than the maximum rate, would be considered an increased assessment and require property owner approval through protest ballot proceedings.

Pg 99
99 2026/2027 City of California City, Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District Page 9 III. DISTRICT BUDGET
Table III
2026/2027 District Budget

BUDGET ITEMS TOTAL DISTRICT

DIRECT COSTS
Maintenance $1,000.00
Water Service 3,300.00
Utilities Electricity 23,000.00
Contracts 6,000.00
Miscellaneous Expenses 0.00
Capital Improvement Expenditures 0.00
Direct Costs (Subtotal) $33,300.00

ADMINISTRATION COSTS
District Administration $4,900.00
County Administration Fee 158.60
Administration Costs (Subtotal) $5,058.60
Total Direct and Admin. Costs $38,358.60

LEVY ADJUSTMENTS
Reserve Fund - Collection/(Transfer) ($6,789.70)
General Fund/Other Revenue Sources-(Contribution) 0.00
Loans - Repayment/(Advances) 0.00
Levy Adjustment (Subtotal) ($6,789.70)
Balance to Levy $31,568.90

DISTRICT STATISTICS
Total Parcels 50.00
Total Parcels Levied 45.00
Total Acreage 14.12
Total Acreage Levied (1) 13.20
Total Benefit Unit Factor (BUF) (2) 6.7858
Levy Per BUF (3) $4,652.20
Approved Maximum Assessment per BUF (4) $4,652.28

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance $181,000.00
Reserve Fund Collection (6,789.70)
Estimated Ending Reserve Fund Balance $174,210.30
(1) Total Acreage levied does not include Exempt parcels. (2) Slight variance in Total Benefit Unit Factor (BUF) due to rounding. (3) Slight variance in Levy Per BUF due to rounding.
(4) Slight variance in Maximum Assessment per BUF due to rounding.

Pg 100
100
2026/2027 City of California City, Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District Page 10 APPENDIX A — DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The supporting Assessor’s Parcel Maps outlining the District boundaries are shown on the following pages. These maps, in connection with the Assessment Roll in Appendix B, constitute the District Assessment Diagram for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.

Pg 101
101
2026/2027 City of California City, Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District Page 11 Pg 102
102
2026/2027 City of California City, Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District Page 12 Pg 103
103
2026/2027 City of California City, Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District Page 13 APPENDIX B — 2026/2027 COLLECTION ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the County Assessor’s Map for the year in which this Report is prepared. Nonassessable lots or parcels include parcels within the boundaries of the District that currently do not benefit from the improvements and are identified as “Exempt” or “SBE”.

A listing of parcels within the District along with the assessment amount for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 is included in the following table.

Table IV
2026/2027 Assessments and Parcel Listing

APN LAND USE DUF LDF ACREAGE BUF LEVY
203-090-01-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 1.0000 0.84 0.8400 $3,907.90 203-090-02-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 1.0000 0.29 0.2900 1,349.16 203-090-03-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 1.0000 0.29 0.2900 1,349.16 203-090-04-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 1.0000 0.29 0.2900 1,349.16 203-090-05-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 1.0000 0.29 0.2900 1,349.16 203-090-07-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 1.0000 0.29 0.2900 1,349.16 203-090-08-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 1.0000 0.29 0.2900 1,349.16 203-090-12-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 1.0000 0.29 0.2900 1,349.16 203-090-13-00 Vacant Commercial/Parking 0.5000 1.0000 0.29 0.1450 674.58 203-090-14-00 Vacant Commercial/Parking 0.5000 1.0000 0.29 0.1450 674.58 203-090-15-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 1.0000 0.38 0.3800 1,767.86 203-090-16-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 0.7500 0.28 0.2100 976.96 203-090-17-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 0.7500 0.21 0.1575 732.72 203-090-20-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 0.7500 0.21 0.1575 732.72 203-090-21-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 0.7500 0.21 0.1575 732.72 203-090-22-00 Exempt 0.0000 0.0000 0.21 0.0000 0.00
203-090-23-00 SBE 0.0000 0.0000 0.21 0.0000 0.00
203-090-24-00 Vacant Commercial/Parking 0.5000 0.7500 0.21 0.0788 366.58 203-090-28-00 Vacant Commercial/Parking 0.5000 0.7500 0.21 0.0788 366.58 203-090-29-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 0.7500 0.21 0.1575 732.72 203-090-30-00 Exempt 0.0000 0.0000 0.21 0.0000 0.00
203-090-33-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 0.7500 0.20 0.1500 697.84 203-090-34-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 0.7500 0.20 0.1500 697.84 203-090-35-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 1.0000 0.29 0.2900 1,349.16 Pg 104
104
2026/2027 City of California City, Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District Page 14

APN LAND USE DUF LDF ACREAGE BUF LEVY
203-090-36-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 1.0000 0.29 0.2900 1,349.16 203-090-37-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 1.0000 0.29 0.2900 1,349.16 203-090-38-00 Exempt 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00
203-090-39-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 0.7500 0.32 0.2400 1,116.54 203-090-40-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 0.7500 0.10 0.0750 348.92 203-090-41-00 Commercial Developed 1.0000 0.7500 0.63 0.4725 2,198.20 203-420-01-00 Exempt 0.0000 0.0000 0.29 0.0000 0.00
203-420-02-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-03-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-04-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-05-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-06-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-07-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-08-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-09-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-10-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-11-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-12-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-13-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-14-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-15-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-16-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-17-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-18-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-19-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0.29 0.0153 71.16 203-420-20-00 Commercial Condominium 0.0526 1.0000 0. 29 0.0153 71.16 Totals: 6.7858 $31,568.90
Pg 105
105

RESOLUTION NO.3229

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY,

CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF

ASSESSMENTS FOR ASPEN MALL LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE The City Council of the City of California City (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council by previous Resolutions formed and levied annual assessments for the Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with section 22500) (hereafter referred to as the “Act”); and,
WHEREAS, the Act provides the City Council the authority to annually levy and collect assessments for the District on the Kern County tax roll on behalf of the City of California City to pay the maintenance and services of the improvements and facilities related thereto; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District, to prepare and file an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22624 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: The City Council hereby orders Willdan Financial Services to prepare and file with the City Clerk the Engineer’s Report concerning the levy of assessments for the District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2026, and ending June 30, 2027, in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the Act.

Section 2: The proposed improvements within the District include: turf, ground cover, shrubs, trees, drainage systems, irrigation systems, lighting, hardscape, and associated appurtenances within the public easements and right-of-ways within the District.

The Engineer’s Report describes the improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements.

Pg 106
106

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April 2026.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF KERN) ss.

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY)
_______________________________,
Marquette E. Hawkins, Mayor
City of California City
I, John Paul Maier, City Clerk of the City of California City, County of Kern, State of California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ____________ was regularly adopted by the City Council of said City of California City at a regular meeting of said council held on the 14th day of April 2026 by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstained:
________________________________
John Paul Maier, City Clerk
City of California City
Pg 107
107

RESOLUTION NO.3230

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, CALIFORNIA, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER’S REPORT

REGARDING THE PROPOSED LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR

THE ASPEN MALL LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027
The City Council of the City of California City (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, this City Council pursuant to provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) did by previous Resolution, order the preparation of an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) for the District known and designated as the Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”) for Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and, WHEREAS, there has been presented to this City Council the Engineer’s Report as required by Chapter 3, Section 22623 of said Act; and,
WHEREAS, this City Council has examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report as presented. This City Council is preliminarily satisfied with each of the budget items and documents as set forth therein and is satisfied that the levy amounts have been spread in accordance with the special benefit received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed within the District, as set forth in said Report.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: That the above recitals are true and correct.

Section 2: That the “Engineer’s Report” as presented, consists of the following:
a) A Description of Improvements.
b) The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Services, Operations and Maintenance).
c) A diagram of the District that identifies the parcels within the District.
d) The District Roll containing the proposed levy of assessments for each Assessor Parcel within the District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.

Pg 108
108

Section 3: The “Engineer’s Report” as presented or as amended is hereby approved on a preliminary basis, and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

Section 4: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Report.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April 2026

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF KERN) ss.

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY)
_______________________________,
Marquette E. Hawkins, Mayor
City of California City
I, John Paul Maier, City Clerk of the City of California City, County of Kern, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ____________ was regularly adopted by the City Council of said City of California City at a regular meeting of said council held on the 14th day of April 2026 by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstained:
________________________________
John Paul Maier, City Clerk
City of California City
Pg 109
109

RESOLUTION NO.3231

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY,

CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT

ASSESSMENTS FOR THE ASPEN MALL LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027
The City Council of the City of California City (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, The City Council has by previous Resolution initiated proceedings for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 regarding the levy and collection of assessments for the Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”). Pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with section 22500) (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), assessments for the District shall be levied and collected by the County of Kern for the City of California City to pay the maintenance and services of the improvements and facilities related thereto; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed District assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 are less than or equal to the maximum assessments previously approved in accordance with the requirements of the California Constitution, Article XIIID; and, WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”), and said Engineer’s Report has been filed with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report as presented and is satisfied with the District, each of the budget items and documents as set forth therein and is satisfied that the proposed assessments contained therein, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed within the District, as set forth in said Report.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22624 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: The above recitals are true and correct.

Section 2: The City Council hereby declares its intention to seek the annual levy and collection of assessments within the District pursuant to the Act, over and including the lands, lots and parcels within the District boundary. The City Council further declares its Pg 110
110

intention to levy and collect assessments on such land to pay the annual costs and expenses of the improvements and services described in Section 4 of this Resolution, for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.

Section 3: The boundaries of the District are described in the Engineer’s Report and are consistent with the boundary established and described in the original formation documents, on file with the City Clerk, and incorporated herein by reference. The District is within the boundaries of the City of California City, within the County of Kern, State of California and includes the territory known as the Aspen Mall and referred to as the “Aspen Mall Landscaping and Lighting District”.

Section 4: The improvements within the District may include, but are not limited to:
turf, ground cover, shrubs, trees, drainage systems, irrigation systems, lighting, hardscape, and associated appurtenances within the public easements and right-of-way. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, landscaping and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping or appurtenant facilities; providing for the satisfactory working condition, life, growth, health and beauty of the improvements, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilization and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste. Servicing means the furnishing of water and electricity for the irrigation and control of the landscaping or appurtenant facilities.

Section 5: The proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/2027, as outlined in the Engineer’s Report, do not exceed the maximum assessment approved by the property owners through a property owner balloting proceeding conducted in 1997. As such, the proposed assessments do not constitute an increased assessment and do not require additional property owner approval in accordance with the requirements of the California Constitution, Article XIIID.

Section 6: The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a Public Hearing concerning the District and the levy of assessments in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22626 of the Act.

Section 7: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Tuesday, May 12, 2026, at 5:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible in the City Council Chambers, located at 21000 Hacienda Blvd., California City.

Section 8: The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Clerk to give notice of the time and place of the Public Hearing to all property owners within the District pursuant to Sections 22626, 22552 and 22553 of the Act and 6061 of the Government Code.

The City Clerk shall give notice to property owners by: causing notice of the public hearing to be published in the local newspaper one time at least 10 days prior to the Public Hearing; and, posting a copy of this resolution on the official bulletin board (s) customarily used for posting such notices.

Pg 111
111

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April 2026.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF KERN) ss.

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY)
_______________________________,
Marquette E. Hawkins, Mayor
City of California City
I, John Paul Maier, City Clerk of the City of California City, County of Kern, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ____________ was regularly adopted by the City Council of said City of California City at a regular meeting of said council held on the 14th day of April 2026 by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstained:
____________________________________
John Paul Maier, City Clerk
City of California City
Pg 112
112
CC 8

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John Paul Maier, Deputy City Manager / City Clerk SUBJECT: Approval of the Biennial Conflict of Interest Code Review and Notice to City Council
BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

The Political Reform Act requires every local government agency to review its conflict-of-interest code biennially to determine whether it is accurate or, if not, whether it must be amended.

To meet the requirements of the Political Reform Act, it is necessary to again review the Conflict of Interest Code to determine whether amendments are necessary based on the following: 1. The addition, deletion, or modification of the specific types of investments, business positions, interests in real property, and sources of income that are reportable for the designated positions. 2. The reclassification, renaming, or deletion of previously designated positions. Any recommendations for updates or confirmation that the current Conflict of Interest Code is accurate will be presented to the City Council for review before the State's October 1, 2026, deadline.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None with this action.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the 2026 Local Agency Biennial Notice under the Political Reform Act and direct the Deputy City Manager / City Clerk to review the Conflict-of-Interest Code and provide an update at a future City Council Meeting.

ATTACHMENTS:
2024 Local Agency Biennial Notice (Reference for 2026 Notice) Pg 113
113
www.fppc.ca.gov
FPPC Advice: [email protected] (866.275.3772)

2024 Local Agency Biennial Notice
Name of Agency:

Mailing Address:

Contact Person: Phone No.

Email: Alternate Email:

Accurate disclosure is essential to monitor whether officials have conflicts of interest and to help ensure public trust in government. The biennial review examines current programs to ensure that the agency’s code includes disclosure by those agency officials who make or participate in making governmental decisions.

This agency has reviewed its conflict of interest code and has determined that (check one BOX):
 An amendment is required. The following amendments are necessary:
(Check all that apply.)
 Include new positions
 Revise disclosure categories
 Revise the titles of existing positions
 Delete titles of positions that have been abolished and/or positions that no longer make or participate in making governmental decisions
 Other (describe)
 The code is currently under review by the code reviewing body.  No amendment is required. (If your code is over five years old, amendments may be necessary.)
Verification (to be completed if no amendment is required) This agency’s code accurately designates all positions that make or participate in the making of governmental decisions. The disclosure assigned to those positions accurately requires that all investments, business positions, interests in real property, and sources of income that may foreseeably be affected materially by the decisions made by those holding designated positions are reported. The code includes all other provisions required by Government Code Section 87302.
__________________________________________ _________________________ Signature of Chief Executive Officer Date
All agencies must complete and return this notice regardless of how recently your code was approved or amended. Please return this notice no later than October 1, 2024, or by the date specified by your agency, if earlier, to:
(PLACE RETURN ADDRESS OF CODE REVIEWING BODY HERE)
PLEASE DO NOT RETURN THIS FORM TO THE FPPC.

Pg 114
114
CC 9
4898-7406-7085 v1

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: 1) Approval of a Job Description for the Position of Police Officer Trainee; 2) Set the Pay Scale for the Position at Range 34; and 3) Authorization to Underfill One (1) Police Officer Vacancy with a Police Officer Trainee
BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

Law Enforcement agencies across the country have been challenged to recruit and retain qualified personnel. The California City Police Department has experienced challenges in all ranks, but in particular the entry-level Police Officer position. A common practice used by many other departments in the region and state is to create a Police Officer Trainee position. This position allows the recruitment of the best candidates and does not depend upon the best candidate having already completed a police academy.

The Police Officer Trainee is a non-sworn, full-time, limited-term, benefited position within the police department. The incumbent in this position is preparing for, or currently participating in, a full-time California Basic Police Academy authorized and certified under the guidelines of the California Peace Officers Standards and Training (P.O.S.T.). Once a Police Officer Trainee completes the police academy they are eligible for appointment to the Police Officer position.

The Police Officer Trainee will receive the same benefits as all civilian members of the Police Department. They pay scale for the position is set at Range 34 which is the same pay scale as the Police Department Code Enforcement Officer Position or approximately 75% of Police Officer pay.

The City Manager and Acting Director of Public Safety have coordinated the development of this position with the California City Police Officers Association (CCPOA). The CCPOA will not represent the Police Officer Trainee position as it is an unrepresented at-will position, however successful Police Officer Trainees will become Police Officers which are represented by the CCPOA.

The Police Department has two vacancies in the Police Officer rank. As part of the fiscal distress plan the City initiated a soft freeze of positions and indicating that filling positions after the fiscal distress resolution would require City Council approval. In this action the City Council is requested to allow one of the vacant Police Officer positions to be undefiled by a Police Officer Trainee. A police academy begins in May that the Police Officer Trainee would be anticipated to attend.

Pg 115
115
CC 9
4898-7406-7085 v1
FISCAL IMPACT:

None with this action. Underfilling a vacant police officer position is within the Police Department budget for the current fiscal year.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve the job description, set the pay scale, and authorize the filling of a Police Officer vacancy.

ATTACHMENTS:

Police Officer Trainee Job Description
Pg 116
116

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY

JOB DESCRIPTION
Police Trainee Officer
2026
Position Control No. 26-001

EMPLOYMENT
CLASSIFICATION: Limited Term / Temporary / At-Will / Unrepresented DEPARTMENT: Police Department
REPORTS TO: Police Sergeant or Police Lieutenant
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE OF JOB: The Police Officer Trainee is a non-sworn, fulltime, limited-term, benefited position within the Police Department. The incumbent in this position is preparing for, or currently participating in, a full-time California Basic Police Academy authorized and certified under the guidelines of the California Peace Officers Standards and Training (P.O.S.T.).

LEVEL OF SUPERVISION REQUIRED: A Field Training Officer (FTO) from the California City Police Department supervises this position with general supervision provided by a Lieutenant as assigned. The Police Officer Trainee may be assigned to work for any Division within the Department before or after attending the Police Academy, or during extended breaks from the Academy, and prior to being officially sworn-in as a regular full-time Police Officer with the City of California City.

SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBLITIES: None
ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPOSIBILITIES:

1) Attain and maintain the ability to successfully enter and complete a POST certified California Police Academy.
2) Complete a firearms course and achieve a qualifying score for firearms qualification under California Penal Code Section 832.
3) Attend classroom activities, scenarios, physical training and other assigned duties, tasks and assignments in the Police Academy.
4) Complete all graded work with a satisfactory score.
5) Maintain honor, demeanor and self-control to the satisfaction of the Recruit Training Officer (RTO) and assigned FTO.
6) Maintain moral, ethical and legal standards commensurate with the Law Enforcement Code of Ethics.
7) Successfully pass the prescribed and required Department firearms training course.

Pg 117
117
8) Follow instructions and directions of assigned supervisors, completing tasks correctly and in a timely manner.
9) Cooperate with other law enforcement agencies.
10) Confer with supervisor on progress and problems concerning assigned duties and tasks.
11) Other duties appropriate for the non-sworn position.

MARGINAL JOB DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
1) Answer telephones, provide routine information, and route calls to appropriate persons.
2) Other duties as assigned.

MINIMUM POSITION REQUIREMENTS:

1) Ability to possess a Basic Certificate as issued by the State Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (P.O.S.T.).
2) Possession of valid Class C Driver’s license and a good driving record. 3) Minimum age of 21 years by time of appointment.
4) High school diploma or GED equivalent.
5) Ability to pass a pre-employment physical, drug screen, polygraph test, live scan with an extensive background check.
6) Pursuant to California Government Code 1031 (a): Be legally authorized to work in the United States under federal law.

MINIMUM ABILITIES:
1) Demonstrate an ability to learn and implement police procedures and methods. 2) Analyze situations accurately and adopt effective courses of action; ability to observe, assimilate, remember, record, and recall pertinent facts and details. 3) Learn laws of arrest and pertinent local, state, and federal laws. 4) Learn criminal investigation techniques and procedures. 5) Learn the safe use and care of firearms.
6) Exercise restraint and good judgment in a variety of emergency situations. 7) Understand and carry out oral and written directions. 8) Prepare accurate case reports; write clearly, accurately, concisely, legibly and in correct grammatical structure and with correct syntax.
9) Use a computer and various software applications.
10) Meet established standards from P.O.S.T. for physical endurance, agility, health, and vision.
11) Establish and maintain cooperative relationships with those contacted in the course of employment.

ESSENTIAL POSITION REQUIREMENTS:
1) Initiative and good judgment within the P.O.S.T. ethical decision-making process standards.

Pg 118
118
2) Tact, discretion, and prudence in establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work. 3) Research, compile, summarize information and materials. 4) Read and interpret complex written material including manuals, memos, letters, minutes, ordinances, and resolutions.
5) Communicate and work effectively with public and employees. 6) Work effectively under pressure.

ESSENTIAL PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS:

Minimum: Must take and pass the P.O.S.T. Academy physical fitness test with a score required to enter the police academy. The test will be given as part of the application process.

Strength: Moderate to heavy.

Ability to: Stand, walk, stoop/bend, lift, push/pull, reach, turn, climb, crouch/crawl, kneel, run, kick, move from one location to another.

Speak clearly and correctly, sit, hear, handle, climb.

Visual acuity (near-under 20 inches, far-over 20 feet), ability to adjust focus.

MARGINAL PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS:

Ability to stand, walk, run, kneel, crouch, stoop, pick up items, lift items..

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS TO WHICH EXPOSED:

Noise Intensity level: Moderate to high; vibration caused by police car, police radio, police sirens, vehicular crashes and gun fire.

Temperature/weather: Exposure to all types of weather conditions, from extreme heat to extreme cold. May be exposed to violent acts of nature, such as heavy rain and flooding, snow, blowing sand, high wind, wind chill.

Mechanical: Danger of being struck by an automobile while stopping or directing traffic, malfunctioning of weapons, automobile accident during high speed chase, shot during performance of job.

Electrical: Exposure to downed power lines.

Burns: Lighting flares, first arrival search at fire call.

Explosives: First arrival search at bomb threat scene.

Radiant Energy: R.A.D.A.R. guns during speed enforcement.

Bio Chemical: First responders to bio chemical/bio terrorism threats.

Pg 119
119
Other: Exposure to unknown drugs which may enter the system by inhalation or through skin pores, exposure to contagious diseases and diseases which may be transmitted by exchange of body fluids.

Atmospheric Conditions:

Fumes: Automotive exhaust, fumes from suspected drugs while processing a crime scene.

Gases: Gasoline at accident scene, refueling patrol car, tear gas.

Approved by City Council April 14, 2026
Pg 120
120
CB 1
4898-7406-7085 v1

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Update of the City Council Declared Fiscal Distress Actions and Calling for a Special City Council Meeting on May 19, 2026 for a Budget Workshop
BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

Below is the timeline for the City’s Declared Fiscal Distress and Related Actions:

January 20, 2026
The City Council provides direction to the City Manager to bring forward a plan to “stop the bleeding” of the city in terms of expenses indicating that the city is in financial distress.

January 27, 2026
The City Council adopts a resolution identifying Local Fiscal Distress; approves the City Manager Manager’s Fiscal Distress Immediate Action Plan; calls for a Budget Stabilization and Fiscal Distress Plan; and directs $1,200,000 in budget reductions.

February 10, 2026
The City Council approves the City Manager’s recommendations to address the direction for $1,200,000 including department level and contract reductions, revenue enhancements, and position layoffs. The City Council approves an Early Retirement Incentive Program in concept and directs that the program return for future approval. The City Council approves the release of an Audit Services Request for Proposals (RFP). The City Council also reviewed actions by the City Council that authorized contracts or expenditures after the adoption of the fiscal year 2025/26 budget.

February 24, 2010
The City Council Authorizes the Employee Early Retirement Incentive Program.

March 10, 2026
The City Council conducts a public hearing to adopt an amendment to the fiscal year 2025/26 budget including $1,373,775.43 in budget reductions and $1,537,800 in additional revenue. The City Council adopts an amended Citywide Master Fee Schedule. The City Council also approves the filling of an existing budgeted Dial-A-Ride Driver/Dispatcher position to avoid the layoff of one position.

Pg 121
121
CB 1
4898-7406-7085 v1
March 23, 2026
Approved layoffs take effect. Three of the employees identified in positions subject to layoffs retire using the Early Retirement Incentive Program. One of the employees identified in a position subject to layoff accepts a transfer/demotion in lieu of layoff. This results in two effective layoffs of employees.

March 24, 2026
The City Council approves the surplus of various equipment for limited revenue generation. The City Council awards a contract for Audit Services. The City Council also releases and RFP for Fees and Cost Allocation.

Fiscal Distress Immediate Action Plan:

The following actions were approved by the City Council for immediate implementation as measures to make immediate and meaningful impact on reducing ongoing expenses and/or advance needed activities to advance long-term stability:
• Suspend the development and hiring of new positions within the City. o This has been implemented.
• Implement a soft freeze on hiring requiring City Council approval to issue a conditional job offer for employment.
o This has been implemented with requests to City Council made to unfreeze budgeted but vacant positions.
• Limit expense approval by the City Manager to emergency and urgent spending items if not funded through grants or other non-general fund sources. o This has been implemented but additional controls for purchasing are needed for longterm success. • Electricity cost reduction: The city spends more than $1 million annually on electricity. Most city facilities do not have smart controls for lighting, HVAC and other high demand items.

Immediate action can be taken to shut-off or otherwise control utilities at facilities when not in use with the goal of installing smart control systems in all facilities over time. o Employees and volunteers have made plans for each facility to control utilities at facilities. Smart control systems vendors are being evaluated. • Discontinue all city sponsored travel and external training except if eligible for reimbursement or necessary for continued operations (e.g. POST reimbursable training). o This has been implemented other than for travel or training paid for prior to the fiscal distress declaration.
• Onboard an unaffiliated individual for comprehensive financial evaluation. o Action is pending.
• Create a list of creditors to send notifications allowing for the next step in the Neutral Evaluation Process to be implemented.
o The list of creditors has been developed. The next step in the Neutral Evaluation process has not been pursued.
• Release a Request for Proposal (RFP) for auditor services for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 audit. o This has been completed and an award has been made to a firm.

Pg 122
122
CB 1
4898-7406-7085 v1
• Establish process to place delinquent utility bills on the property tax roll. o Action is pending.
• Release and RFP for debt collection services and refer all unpaid amounts for collection. • Provide written direction to staff that all waivers and forgiveness of fees, taxes, or debt to the city be authorized only by the City Council unless for good cause or legal reasons as determined by the City Manager.
o Action is pending.
• Provide a list of City Council approved expenditures and contracts in fiscal year 2025/2026 for consideration of withdraw or amendment.
o This has been completed and the contracts directed for cancellation have been cancelled.

Budget Stabilization and Fiscal Distress Plan (continuing actions):

The City Manager’s Budget Stabilization and Fiscal Distress Plan as initially proposed included the following non-exhaustive list of actions:

• Create for adoption and implementation best practices Finance Policies for financial controls of:
o Payroll
o Budgeting (including fund and department level transfer approvals levels) o Reserves
o Purchasing
o Investment
o Bank Reconciliation
o Credit Card Use
 This is in progress with select policies planned for implementation with the fiscal year 2026/27 budget development process.
• Create an interim update to the master fee schedule and plan to release a request an RFP for a consultant to develop and recommend a comprehensive fee schedule update. o The interim update has been adopted and an RFP has been released. • A recommendation to eliminate deficit spending within the budget at midyear. o Deficit spending was eliminated with a structurally balanced general fund budget through the City Council adopted budget amendment.
• Conduct a revenue audit of major tax sources.
o The initial audit is complete.
• Conduct a resource optimization assessment to include opportunities to consolidate and or contract for service where a reduction in cost, improvement in service for the same cost, or a reduction in overhead and time to manage the program can be realized. This includes the potential for shared services with other fiscally stable governmental entities. o This work is ongoing.
• Conduct a water savings evaluation for the golf course. o This work is ongoing
• A plan to release an RFP for development of an impact fee study (AB1600) o This has been deferred with the City currently not charging its only development impact fee for water.

Pg 123
123
CB 1
4898-7406-7085 v1
• A plan to release an RFP for utility rate studies including an updated 218 process to adopt and implement fee changes.
o The RFP was released and a contract has been awarded for water and wastewater rate studies.
• The development of a short-term revenue and expenditure modeling by month and a plan to present a 5-year revenue and modeling process to be included with the annual budget development schedule.
o The initial modeling has been performed.
• A plan to release an RFP for a citywide cost allocation plan o The RFP was released in conjunction with the citywide fee study. • A plan to update water and wastewater policies regarding payments and forgiveness. o This has been deferred until the rate studies are complete. • Evaluation / Reevaluation of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) allocations made by the City Council including the balance of approximately $400,000 after anticipated projects which must be used for qualified projects by December 31, 2026, to determine if the funds can be reassigned to higher priority activities.
o This was conducted. All funds will be used within their purpose by year end. • Evaluation / Reevaluation of AES donation allocation made by the City Council beyond use for general liability insurance to determine if the funds can be reassigned to higher priority activities.
o All of the AES funds will be exhausted with the action to approve lighting for little league. An amendment to the agreement with AES will be required. • Provide a comprehensive list of tax and related revenue opportunities for consideration of the City Council.
o Action is pending.
• Work with SDI Committee to evaluate potential options to select an independent investment fiduciary for SDI funds after completion of the SDI audit. o Action is pending.

Budget Stabilization and Fiscal Distress Plan Budget Amendment The first amendment to the fiscal year 25/26 budget was approved on March 10, 2026. It included reconciling expenditures approved by the City Council after the adoption of the fiscal year budget as well as the expense reductions and revenue enhancements directed by the City Council. The action included a $1,373,775.43 reduction in expenses for departmental programming, contract reduction or elimination, and layoffs. The action included recognizing $1,537,800.00 in additional revenue for the fiscal year. The budget amendment made the current fiscal year budget structurally balanced with revenue at or exceeding expenditures for the general fund.

Budget Stabilization and Fiscal Distress Plan Budget Development Fiscal Year 2026/27 Priorities and Outcomes
• Protecting Public Safety and Essential Services.
o Budget to maintain public safety and essential services prior to other services.

Pg 124
124
CB 1
4898-7406-7085 v1
• Maintaining basic customer service capacity for all departments and programs. o Budget to maintain basic customer service capacity for all departments and programs. • Steets Reconstruction and Transformation Initiative (SRTI). o Define streets and areas that will be prioritized for crack seal and pothole repair in the fiscal year.
 Using streets funding
o Define street segments to be prioritized for reconstruction in the fiscal year.  Using Transportation Development Act (TDA) and other funding. • This will require engaging a consultant to complete outstanding TDA audits.
• Safer streets for all (Cars, Bicycles, Motorcycles, Pedestrians, Wheelchairs, etc.). o Prioritize funding if available speed enforcement, education, and intervention activities.
o Ensure developers fair share to multi-modal transit is included in all development.

Budget Stabilization Measures
• Evaluate all existing and vacant positions for consolidation or elimination. • Engage in employee cost reduction through negotiations including benefit reform. • Leverage technology to support staff and improve customer access and experience. • Reduce litigation liability.
• Implement plans to contract out or stabilize underperforming programs and activities including:
o Golf course
o Airport
o Parks and Recreation
Revenue Generation and Management
• Execute on the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) increase measure to be placed on the November ballot as directed by the City Council.
• Provide all routine options for revenue generation for the City Council’s consideration in the first quarter of the new fiscal year.
• Utilize studies to adopt a new Citywide Master Fee schedule and new water and wastewater rates in compliance with Proposition 218.
• Pursue grants and other assistance for defined needs or unfunded activities that are deferred priorities.
• Engage in economic development, jobs creation, and housing development through local and regional participation and branding of the City and its resources.

Fiscal Year 2026/27 Budget Workshop Format (Green, Yellow, Orange, Red) Staff intends to present a balanced budget for the City Council’s consideration (green budget). In addition, we will demonstrate three budget add-ons (yellow, orange, and red budgets) that could be considered by the City Council in relation to additional costs.

Pg 125
125
CB 1
4898-7406-7085 v1
Green
The green budget is the base budget for presentation at the workshop. It uses the existing fiscal year budget as amended as a basis and includes adjustments to present a balanced budget of expenditures against revenues.

Yellow
The yellow budget uses the existing amended budget as a basis without adjustments for revenue and presents the additional costs between the green and yellow budgets.

Orange
The orange budget is an add-on to the green or yellow budget to show the cost of additional general fund contributions to support streets programming and speed enforcement as identified in the budget priorities.

Red
The red budget is the current fiscal year budget prior to the budget amendment adjusted for the priorities as identified.

The desired outcome of the budget workshop is for the City Council to consider the budget information as provided, take public input, and provide direction for which components, programs, and expenditures should be included in a final draft budget for the City Council’s consideration in June of 2026.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve and/or modify the process identified for the development of the fiscal year 2026/27 budget and call for a special meeting on May 19, 2026, to conduct a budget workshop.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None with this action.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the report and call for the May 19, 2026 special meeting.

ATTACHMENTS:

None.

Pg 126
126
CB 2
4898-7406-7085 v1

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean Grayson, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Review of Future Options for the City Owned Tierra Del Sol Golf Course and California City Municipal Airport
BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

During AB1234 reporting at the February 24, 2026, City Council meeting, the City Council provided direction to the City Manager to bring back a report on leasing and other options for the city owned and Tierra Del Sol Golf Course (golf course) and California City Municipal Airport (airport).

Both the airport and the golf course share a common set of challenges including:
• No direct management oversight of operations
• Limited maintenance being performed
• A large amount of deferred maintenance
• Losses to the City’s general fund attributed to their operations They both also share the possibility of enhance revenue generation across multiple revenue streams but it should be noted that the City will not be well positioned to capitalize on these possibilities in the near term or midrange for future planning.

GOLF COURSE
Golf Course Current Status
No operations assessment, action plan, facilities conditions and needs assessment, or golf course master plan is in place. Current and previous staff provided input on an initial status evaluation of the course and it matches what is likely already intuitively known by the community:
• The course has a year-over-year loss which translates to a cost to the general fund of $350,000 annually on average. This cost will likely be higher after the new internal cost allocation model is developed and approved.
• The course was designed by a highly rated designer and remains a good design for modern municipal golf needs.
• Water is and has been a challenge for the golf course and is its single largest budgetary expense. •
Pg 127
127
CB 2
4898-7406-7085 v1
• There are unrepaired water leaks that lead to higher water consumption and decreased aesthetics of the course.
• The course is cash only and there is not point of sale or other system to track metrics such as rounds, where fees come from, time of day and day of week use, etc. • The staffing model is unsustainable and relies on part-time paid volunteerism. There is no supervision or management including of financial activities. • There are electrical and plumbing issues throughout the course. • All infrastructure has deteriorated under deferred maintenance. • The expansion project for the clubhouse was stopped after the foundation was poured and there is no plan to continue it.
• There is no longer a restaurant of food and beverage services on site.

A common survey list of what makes people choose to go to specific golf courses includes 13 criteria. The City’s golf course would receive high marks on 2 of the criteria, marginal marks on 3 of the criteria, and failing marks on 8 of the criteria:

High Marks
• Pricing
• Availability of tee times
Marginal Marks
• Location
• Overall environment
• Level of service/friendliness
Failing Marks
• Amenities
• Quality of facilities
• Condition of facilities
• Programming
• Staff
• Website
• Marketing
• Quality of food and beverage
Actions by Staff: Golf Course
Staff sent email communication regarding the request from the City Council and the current status of the golf course to all entities operating municipal golf courses on behalf of cities or counties as the owners where the agreement was initiated or renewed in the past five years (where the agreement was publicly available). All of the contacted entities responded the communication.

There was one site visit conducted by an entity while the rest engaged in virtual communications.

The following is a synopsis of the information shared by the entities regarding the golf course:
• It is a good golf course that has significant maintenance issues. • An enhancement of the maintenance approach and conditions is needed.

Pg 128
128
CB 2
4898-7406-7085 v1
• Significant infrastructure development will be needed in the future but not immediately. • The volume and cost of water used for the golf course is concerning. • The identified challenges by the City are significant but can be overcome. • A food services offering needs to come back to the course. • An enhancement of the customer service operations is needed.

Overall, the entities all suggested that they would respond to an RFP for a management contract or an RFQ for a public private vendor but they would likely not respond to a lease RFP without funds provided to them for operations related to the lease.

Golf Course Options
Options for the golf course fall into 6 broad categories of action: Status Quo, Cuts to the Status Quo, Closure, Sale, Lease, Management Contract. There is no silver bullet and the City will not be able to quickly achieve a win with regard to operations or fiscal efficiencies. There is the potential to slow and reverse the general fund cost to the golf course and improve its maintenance if that is the direction provided.

Status Quo
Maintaining the status quo has essentially no positive findings. The City would continue to have the following negative impacts:
• $350,000+ annual general fund losses in support of the golf course. • Water issues including leaks unrepaired.
• The overall condition of the facility continues to decline. • Part-time employees with no management or fiscal oversight. • Cash only business.
• The City cannot capitalize on opportunities for revenue streams such as a restaurant. • The facility expansion is incomplete and bordering on a nuisance.

If the city determines to maintain the status quo it should consider funding a leak repair program in the next fiscal year budget which would almost certainly pay for itself in reduced water usage
Cuts to the Status Quo
This would involve reduction of hours and/or days of operations from the current operations. This would have a small savings from reduced staff hours but very limited reduction in overall costs and a potential for lost revenues to exceed reduced costs.

Closure (temporary or permanent)
The pros of closure include:
• Immediately reduce the general fund loss for the golf course operations. • One less thing to maintain for stretched staff.

The cons of closure include:
• The golf course is likely irrecoverable as a golf course within 3-6 months of closure without significant capital expense.

Pg 129
129
CB 2
4898-7406-7085 v1
• All potential revenue from the golf course and related facilities is lost. • A community amenity that was part of the original master plan for the community would be lost.

Sell (as golf course or for other purpose)
The pros of selling include:
• The city would reduce the general fund loss for the golf course operations. • One less thing to maintain for stretched staff.
• Possibility for active redevelopment of the area.

The cons of selling include:
• The location would likely not be used for golf course or other community amenity. • The value is low on a per acre basis.
• It would take a long time to market and sell the property. • All potential revenue from the golf course and related facilities is lost. • A community amenity that was part of the original master plan for the community would be lost.

Lease (all expenses and revenues / risk and reward)
The pros of leasing include:
• The city would reduce the general fund loss for the golf course operations. • One less thing to maintain for stretched staff.
• Possibility for active redevelopment of the golf course.

The cons of leasing include:
• The value is very low and might require city subsidy. • It would take a long time to market and lease the property. • It is possible, even likely that there would not be a lease due to lack of bidders. • All potential revenue from the golf course and related facilities is lost. • A community amenity that was part of the original master plan for the community would be lost.

Management Contract (city to maintain costs and revenues) The pros of a management contract include:
• Likely would slowly reduce the general fund loss stabilizing over time • The amenities would be improved.
• The course would be improved.
• Opportunities for improvement including:
o Credit card and non-cash payments.
o Improved customer service ability.
o Improved Pro Shop.
o Restoration of food and beverage services.
o Professional advertising.
o Driving range memberships.
• Professionally maintained facilities.

Pg 130
130
CB 2
4898-7406-7085 v1
• One less thing to maintain for stretched staff.
• Can require local non-profit engagement.
• Management contracts are used by many small and large vendors and most that were contacted would consider bidding.
• Could also be opened to a public/private partnership bid from local non-profit or for-profit entities.

The cons of a management contract include:
• It will not realize cessation of general fund loss in the near term. • I will eventually require capital investment as part of the contract.

AIRPORT
Airport Current Status
No operations assessment, action plan, or facilities conditions and needs assessment is in place.

Staff recently worked with the contract City Engineer and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to create a plan for the use of federal funds for airport improvements. This largely addresses deferred maintenance of the physical components of the airport with the first project to be funded in calendar year 2026 is Runway Crackfill and Resealing. The following is a broad overview of the current condition of the airport:
• The airport has a year-over-year loss which translates to a cost to the general fund of $150,000 annually on average. This cost will likely be higher after the new internal cost allocation model is developed and approved.
• The airport is well designed and positioned for use and was once used for multiple services and programs in support of regional aviation.
• Maintenance is and has been a challenge for the airport. • Compliance with FAA requirements is and has been a challenge for the airport. • The leasing process and documents for hangers, tie-downs, and other airport facilities needs to be modernize, uniform, and approved by the City Council. • The facility does not support fuel sales in a manner needed for full airport operations. • The staffing model is unsustainable and relies on Public Works employees to perform limited maintenance and volunteerism. There is no supervision or management including of financial activities.
• The hangers are in various states and all need maintenance and upgrades. • All infrastructure has deteriorated under deferred maintenance. • There is no longer a restaurant of food and beverage services on site. • The once successful glider program and skydiving program long ago moved away.

Actions by Staff: Airport
Staff initiated communication regarding the request from the City Council and the current status of the airport with airport management from the Mojave Air and Spaceport (East Kern Airport District), City of Tehachapi airport, Kern County Airports, retired former Airport Directors from Salinas and Nevada County, and the City’s FAA representatives. All of the contacted entities responded the communication and provided valuable input. There was one site visit conducted by a Dr. David Smith who is the CEO of the Mojave Air and Spaceport while the rest engaged in Pg 131
131
CB 2
4898-7406-7085 v1
virtual communications. The following is a synopsis of the information related to Dr. Smith’s site visit:

City staff, Councilmember Smith, and Dr. Smith conducted a walkthrough to assess the current condition and operational status of the California City Municipal Airport. Public Works Director Joe Barragan and his staff, Marion Cato, provided a comprehensive overview of the runway conditions, overall facility status, and ongoing operational challenges. Their insights provided historical and current issues affecting the airport, which they shared with Dr. Smith.

Councilmember Smith also participated in the discussion, contributing important past efforts to address deficiencies. This discussion provided a clear picture of the airport’s current state and a potential strategic opportunity.

During the assessment, Dr. Smith outlined several critical first steps necessary to initiate airport revitalization efforts and position the facility for future success. These priorities include:
• Establishing on-site aviation fuel infrastructure to increase airport utilization • Pursuing grant funding opportunities to support infrastructure improvements • Ensuring strict compliance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations related to tenant use and airport operations.
• Maintaining and enhancing on-site amenities, such as attracting a restaurant tenant, and addressing immediate maintenance needs, including runway slurry seal, roof repairs, and HVAC replacement.

Dr. Smith emphasized that successful revitalization will require a coordinated approach that combines infrastructure investment, regulatory compliance, and proactive engagement with funding agencies.

These initial discussions support the formation of an Airport Ad-Hoc Committee to evaluate these priorities, ensure compliance with applicable laws, including the Brown Act, and develop recommendations for City Council consideration, including potential regional partnerships and formal steps toward long-term airport activation. An initial action of the Ad Hoc Committee would be to develop a letter of intent and to pursue a presentation to the East Kern Airport District to formalize a relationship with the Mojave Air and Spaceport through an intergovernmental relationship.

Airport Options
Status quo
Maintaining the status quo has essentially no positive findings. The City would continue to have the following negative impacts:
• $150,000+ annual general fund losses in support of the golf course • The overall condition of the facility continues to decline. • Employees working at the facility as a “side project”. • Limited fuel infrastructure.
• Deficient facility and amenity leasing process.
• The City cannot capitalize on opportunities for revenue streams such as a restaurant.

Pg 132
132
CB 2
4898-7406-7085 v1
Close
Complete closure of the airport is impractical in the short term given the investment of federal dollars at the facility and the conditions of the use of those funds. Other cities have closed airports although in all such circumstances it was to recover the land of the airport for repurposing in areas with little to no buildable land. California City does not have this condition.

Sell
Selling the airport is impractical for the same reasons as closure with the added reality that there is likely no interest in such a purchase.

Management Contract
The pros of a management contract include:
• It would likely slowly reduce the general fund loss stabilizing over time • The city would spend more budget funds than current but likely reduce the losses by a greater amount than the cost of the contract.
• FAA and other legal compliance could be addressed in the contract. • Amenity improvement could be addressed in the contract. • Credit card acceptance, food and beverage, advertising, and fuel could all be addressed in the contract.
• One less thing to maintain for stretched staff.
• Can require local non-profit engagement or engagement of a commission / committee.

The cons of a management contract include:
• The city has recently engaged in such a contract that was unsuccessful. • The City has limited capacity for management oversight of a contract. • The facility will still eventually require capital investment • Such contracts are initiated by a very limited number of vendors for general aviation, partnering with the county or other governmental programs may be better opportunities.

Internal Management Approach With Contract Employee or Public-Public Partnership This option would include hiring or contracting with an individual to serve as the Airport Director to perform the tasks that would otherwise be accomplished through a management contract. This could include contracting for personnel from another governmental airport operator.

The pros of an internal management approach include:
• It would likely slowly reduce the general fund loss stabilizing over time • The city would spend more budget funds than current but likely reduce the losses by a greater amount than the cost of the contract.
• FAA and other legal compliance could be addressed by the employee / contractor. • Amenity improvement could be addressed in plans by the employee / contractor. • Credit card acceptance, food and beverage, advertising, and fuel could all be addressed as work requirements for the employee / contractor.
• Adds a layer of management and oversight for the airport not currently present and that would be lacking in a management contract.
• Can require local non-profit engagement or engagement of a commission / committee by the employee / contractor.

Pg 133
133
CB 2
4898-7406-7085 v1
The cons of an internal management approach include:
• The city has previously had an airport manager that did not result in avoidance of the current conditions at the airport.
• The facility will still eventually require capital investment Regional Engagement
As noted as an outcome of Dr. Smith’s visit as well as by essentially all other contacted individuals, the city should consider a regional engagement strategy regardless of the option selected. This would include a formalize relationship with other governmental entities and industry groups. The proposed Ad Hoc committee would be the initial contact with staff in this regard with any decision making returning to the City Council for consideration.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None with this action.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council receive the report and provide direction on future golf course and airport options including the appointment of an Airport Ad Hoc Committee to engage external agencies governing boards.

ATTACHMENTS:

None.

Pg 134
134
CB 3
1 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM April 14, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Joe D. Barragan, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Accept the Bid from Coast Construction, LLC for the Little League Lights Project at Central Park, with a Contract Sum of $235,246.39; Authorize Contingency and Project Management Costs, and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Construction Agreement
BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

California City was donated nearly $350,000 by AES Green Energy Corp for the Little League Lights Project at Central Park. After completion of all other projects approved by the City Council for the use of the donated funds, only $202,000 remains. The boys' field is equipped with outdated lighting fixtures that are currently nonfunctional. Therefore, retrofitting the existing lights at the boys' field is a more costeffective solution compared to installing new lighting systems and poles at the girls' field.

This project includes demolition of existing concrete pads, electrical equipment, and lighting, followed by installation of a new slab, transformer, switchboard, lighting control panel, stadium lights, trenching, and any required electrical hardware.

On March 18, 2026, at 2:00 PM, the City Clerk opened two sealed bids for the Little League Lights Project.

The following is the tabulation of the bids:

No. Bidder Total Base Bid
1 Coast Construction
Group, LLC $235,244.56
2 Silverfox Electric Inc $238,003.11
The City Engineer (BHT Engineering, Inc.) has determined that Coast Construction Group is the lowest responsible bidder for the base bid for this project. The City will issue a Notice to Proceed for materials acquisition. Upon receipt of the materials, a subsequent Notice to Proceed for construction will be issued, marking the commencement of thirty construction days.

Pg 135
135
CB 3
2 In addition to the bid award, City staff also recommend approval of $23,524.00 (10%) for construction contingency and $28,229.00 (12%) for project management, materials sampling, and testing. These amounts are "not to exceed" amounts and will not require further Council approval. Contingency funds cover unforeseen construction needs.

The proposed Resolution would accept the bid by Coast Construction Group, LLC, authorize the abovespecified contingency and Project management costs, and authorize the City Manager to execute a construction agreement with Coast Construction Group in a form approved by the City Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total Project costs, including recommended contingency and Project management costs, will be $286,997.56, and funding for the Project will come from AES Donation, as further set forth below.

Costs: Bid Construction Total: $ 235,244.56
Contingency 10%: $ 23,524.00
Construction Management and Materials
Sampling & Testing 12%: $ 28,229.00
Total Construction Phase Cost: $ 286,997.56
Funding: AES Green Energy Corp Donation Funds: $ 202,000.00 Local Match from General Fund: 84,997.56
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution finding Coast Construction Group LLC the lowest responsive bidder with a $235,244.56 base bid for the Little League Lights Project, authorize contingency and management costs, and authorize the City Manager to sign the construction agreement.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

A CEQA Notice of Exemption will be filed.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Bids Summary

2. Proposed Resolution No. 3232

3. Project Plans
Pg 136
136
BHT Engineering, Inc. BHT# 25406
DIR# 1001077812 DIR#100859963
Bid Opening: March 18, 2026 @ 2:00 PM Lic: 1071417 Lic: 1052875

BOYS FIELD COAST CONSTRUCTION SILVERFOX ELECTRIC
1 REMOVE EXISTING AND PROVIDE & INSTALL EQUIPMENT REINFORCED CONCRETE FOUNDATION LS 1 $ 8,000.00 $8,000.00 $10,821.33 $10,821.33 $14,928.10 $14,928.10 2 REMOVE EXISTING AND PROVIDE & INSTALL NEW 150 KVA XFRM AND 400A 480V, 3-PH TESCOFLEX 24-400, MOD 666024 NEMA 3R OR APPROVED EQUAL LS 1 28,000.00 $ $28,000.00 $75,349.42 $75,349.42 $55,796.55 $55,796.55 3 REMOVE EXISTING AND FURNISH AND INSTALL BALL FIELD LIGHT FIXTURES 500W LED STADIUM PRO IV AND REQUIRED HARDWARE OR APPROVED EQUAL EA. 43 5,000.00 $ $215,000.00 $1,707.99 $73,443.57 $4,030.60 $96,734.37 4 DISTRIBUTION TRENCHING AND BACKFILLING, NEW PVC CONDUITS, FITTINGS, WIRING, AND RELATED ELEC ITEMS PER PLANS LF 700 $ 92.00 $64,400.00 $87.98 $61,586.00 $58.10 $40,670.00 5 FURNISH AND INSTALL PULL BOXES EA. 8 $ 1,200.00 $9,600.00 $1,755.53 $14,044.24 $3,734.44 $29,875.52 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $325,000.00 BASE BID TOTAL $235,244.56 BASE BID TOTAL $238,004.54 OPTION 1 GIRLS FIELD
1 FURNISH AND INSTALL AREA LIGHT POLES WITH 4 FIXTURES W/FOOTING, EA. 2 34,000.00 $ $68,000.00 $18,689.17 $37,378.34 2 FURNISH AND INSTALL AREA LIGHT POLES WITH 6 FIXTURES W/FOOTING, EA. 2 42,000.00 $ $84,000.00 $20,641.62 $41,283.24 3 FURNISH AND INSTALL AREA LIGHT POLES WITH 8 FIXTURES W/FOOTING, EA. 2 48,000.00 $ $96,000.00 $22,594.07 $45,188.14 LIGHTING DESIGN FIRM 4 POLES 20 LIGHTS LS 1 $191,773.75 $191,773.75 4 DISTRIBUTION TRENCHING AND BACKFILLING, NEW PVC CONDUITS, FITTINGS, WIRING, AND RELATED ELEC ITEMS PER PLANS LF 740 $ 92.00 $68,080.00 $62.56 $46,294.40 $84.82 $62,766.80 5 FURNISH AND INSTALL PULL BOXES EA. 6 $ 1,200.00 $7,200.00 $5,152.82 $30,916.92 $4,562.25 $27,373.50 OPTION 1 TOTAL $316,080.00 OPTION 1 BID TOTAL $201,061.04 OPTION 1 BID TOTAL $281,914.05

COST PER

UNIT TOTAL COST COST PER UNIT TOTAL COST

COST PER
UNIT TOTAL COST COST PER UNIT COST PER UNIT TOTAL COST EST. QNTY

BIDS SUMMARY

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY

LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL FIELD
ITEM
NO. ITEM CODE UNIT OF MEASURE

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
TOTAL COSTTOTAL COST ITEM NO. ITEM CODE UNIT OF MEASURE EST. QNTY COST PER UNIT T:\4-CALIFORNIA CITY\DOC\2025 Projects\25406 LITTLE LEAGUE AREA LIGHTS\BIDDING PHASE\Bid Summary Pg 137
137
4902-3735-5679 v1

RESOLUTION NO. 26-3232

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA

CITY, CALIFORNIA, TO ACCEPT THE BID FROM COAST

CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC FOR THE LITTLE LEAGUE LIGHTS

PROJECT AT THE CENTRAL PARK WITH A CONTRACT SUM OF
$235,244.56, TO AUTHORIZE A 10% CONTINGENCY AND PROJECT

MANAGEMENT COSTS, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE THE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, California City has $202,000 that was donated by AES Green Energy Corp for the Little League Lights Project at Central Park; and WHEREAS, this project includes demolition of existing concrete pads, electrical equipment, and lighting, followed by installation of a new slab, transformer, switchboard, lighting control panel, stadium lights, trenching, and any required electrical hardware; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2026, at 2:00 PM, the City Clerk opened two sealed bids for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer and City Council have determined that the Coast Construction Group, LLC, is the lowest responsible bidder; and

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, CALIFORNIA AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of California City (“City”) hereby approves the bid submitted by Coast Construction Group for the Project, with a base bid amount of $235,244.56. The City Council further approves $23,524.00 (10%) for construction contingencies and $28,229.00 (12%) for Project management, materials sampling, and testing. These amounts are "not to exceed" amounts and will not require further Council approval.

SECTION 3: The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a construction agreement for the Project with Coast Construction Group in a form approved by the City Attorney.

SECTION 4: The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution.

SECTION 5: This Resolution becomes effective immediately upon approval by the City Council.

Pg 138
138
4902-3735-5679 v1

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on this 14th day of April 2026 by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Marquette E. Hawkins
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

John Paul Maier, MBA, MMC Victor M. Ponto
City Clerk City Attorney
Pg 139
139
4902-3735-5679 v1

STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF KERN } SS
CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY }
I, John Paul Maier, City Clerk of the City of California City, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of California City on the _________ day of ________________ 2026, by the following vote:

John Paul Maier, MBA, MMC
City Clerk
Pg 140
140
P2 P1 P3 P4 P5P6 P7 P8 GP1 GP2 GP3 GP4 GP6 GP5 BHT 01 VICINITY MAP NTS GENERAL NOTES PROJECT SITE Know what's below Call 811 before you dig CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT PLANS FOR LITTLE LEAGUE LIGHTS PROJECT ··········· SCALE 1"=30'

CONKLIN BLV
Pg 141
141
P2 P1 P3 P4 P5P6 P7 P8 GP1 GP2 GP3 GP4 GP6 GP5 12 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Feet 0 20 40 BHT02 NS W E 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 2 3 Pg 142
142
ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE LITTLE LEAGUE 400A, 480V, 3ɸ, 65k SCCR LOW PROFILE SERVICE/DISTRIBUTION PANEL TESCOFLEX 24-200, 30 CKTS. NEMA 3R BHT03 Pg 143
143
- - REMOVE EXISTING & REPLACE WITH 400A, 480V, 3ɸ, 65k SCCR LOW PROFILE SERVICE/DISTRIBUTION PANEL TESCOFLEX 24-400, 666024 SIDE TO SIDE NEMA 3R. CKT'S AS REQUIRED. - BHT04 OR AN APPROVED EQUAL Pg 144
144
CB 4

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Joe Barragan, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution to Authorize the Purchase of a Front Loader from Clairemont Equipment in the Amount of $242,304.32
BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

The Clean-up Crew is in need of a front loader to remove the trash and debris that is illegally dumped in town. The Clean-up crew has been borrowing the Street Department’s Front Loader, but that piece of equipment no longer works and needs a new engine. This purchase will be made with Illegal Dumping Funds. When the City submitted the documents to the County for the use of the Illegal Dumping Funds, the City specifically stated that the funds would be used to purchase equipment to eradicate illegal dumping in California City. The County approved the use of these funds for that purpose. In the approved Fiscal Year Budget for 2025-26, in GL# 27-4413-740, there is $250,000 for the purchase of a front loader.

As requested, staff evaluated the possibility of obtaining previous model year equipment. One of the bidders (Coastline) provided a bid for a 2025 model year and a 2026 model year, the other two bidders provided only a 2026 model year bid. A bid process using the attached specifications requested document was implemented by staff to obtain at least three quotes from qualified bidders following the regulations in the City Municipal Code Section 3-3.109.(b)(2)(iii). The new specs that were used for the bids removed the forklift attachment an the hydraulic coupler that had been in the previous bid equipment before the City Council resulting in lower overall bids from all three vendors. The bids received were:

Company Brand Price Delivery Training
Included Included
Clairemont Equipment Komatsu $242,304.32 Yes Yes
Coastline Equipment John Deere $255,140.00 Yes No
Coastline Equipment (2025) John Deere $246,500.00 Yes No Sequoia Equipment Co. Case $270,159.53 Yes No
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the purchase from Clairemont Equipment since their quote was the least expensive.

Pg 145
145
CB 4
FISCAL IMPACT:

There are no general fund expenditures related to the purchase. The total amount of $242,304.32 will be funded from the Purchase of Equipment account in the Street Fund (2025-26 Fiscal Budget GL# 27-4413-740).

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the resolution authorizing the Interim City Manager to purchase the new front loader from Clairemont Equipment for $242,304.32.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2026-3233

2. Specifications Requested

3. Quotes
Pg 146
146
4927-8342-9785 v1 Page 1 of 2

RESOLUTION NO. 26-3233

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CALIFORNIA CITY APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF A NEW FRONT
LOADER
The City Council of the City of California City (hereafter referred to as the “City”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, an informal bid process was used by staff to obtain at least three quotes from qualified bidders following the regulations in the City Municipal Code Section 3-

3.109.(b)(2)(iii); and
WHEREAS, when the City submitted the documents to the County for the use of the Illegal Dumping Funds, the City specifically stated that the funds would be used to purchase equipment to eradicate illegal dumping in California City; and WHEREAS, the County approved the use of these funds for that purpose; and WHEREAS, the Clean-up Crew needs a front loader to remove the trash and debris that is illegally dumped in town.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2: The City Council hereby approves the purchase of a new front loader from Clairemont Equipment for $242,304.32 and authorizes the City Manager to execute the related purchase agreement.

SECTION 2: City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of California City, this ___ day of _________________ 2026.
__________________________
Marquette Hawkins
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________ __________________________
John Paul Maier Victor M. Ponto,
City Clerk City Attorney
Pg 147
147
4927-8342-9785 v1 Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATION
I, John Paul Maier, City Clerk of the City of California City, California, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a meeting of the City Council of said City at its meeting held on the ____ of ______________ 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of California City, California, this ____day of _________, 2026.

__________________________
John Paul Maier
City Clerk
Pg 148
148
The City of California City is accepting quotes for a new 2026 Front Wheel Loader with the following specifications and size:
• Year: 2026
• Engine: Tier 4 Diesel
• Horsepower: At least 165 Net
• Transmission: 5-Speed
• Cab: Enclosed with Heat and AC
• Seat: Basic
• Seatbelts: 3” Standard
• No Radio
• Visibility: Standard
• Steering: Standard Hydraulic
• Levers and Joysticks: Standard
• Axles: Standard
• Fenders and Steps: Standard
• Lights: LEDs
• No remote start
• Counterweight: Standard
• Mirrors: Standard
• Bucket General Purpose, 3.25 CY (heaped), 60” Wide minimum with bolt-on cutting edge
• Dump Height: 9’ Minimum
• Rims: Standard
• Tires: Standard
• Warranty: 3 Years or 3000 Hours
• Delivery: Needs to California City, CA; be included in price • Training: Needs to be included in price
• Manuals: Two Hard Copies and one on a flash drive
• Coupler: Standard/Pin-On
• Attachments: None, only the standard 5’ bucket that comes with the loader • Taxes: Need to be included in quote (8.25%)
Please provide a quote by April 1st at [email protected].

Pg 149
149

SERVING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SINCE 1970
WA320-8
Prepared for:

Joe D. Barragan
Prepared by:

Terry Rose
[email protected]
912-257-0068
Quotation Number: trose-0046
04-03-2026
Proposal for:

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY
Pg 150
150
SERVING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SINCE 1970
Quote #:trose-0046
April 3, 2026
Joe D. Barragan
Public Work Director

CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY

Dear Joe,
We are pleased to present to you the following detailed specification and pricing information regarding the following:
2026 Komatsu WA320-8 OrderFactory Order Stock: N.I.S 0
Clairemont Equipment is pleased to offer one (1) new Komatsu WA320-8 wheel loader, EPA Tier 4 Final diesel engine, enclosed cab with heat and air conditioning, standard LED lighting, standard mirrors, standard hydraulic steering, and standard general purpose bucket configuration. Delivery to California City, California, operator familiarization/training, and applicable sales tax are included in the final selling price. Please note the following exceptions/clarifications to the published specification request: machine net horsepower is 165 HP, transmission is hydrostatic with 4 forward / 4 reverse speed ranges, quick coupler is standard, and standard machine build includes upgraded heated air-suspension seat and radio package unless otherwise revised at order entry.

Thank you for the opportunity to present this quote for Clairemont Equipment products and services. We look forward to discussing further details on the information enclosed. This quote is good for 30 days and is contingent upon prior sale.

Please sign this quote if it is inclusive of all items discussed. This is not a sales agreement, it merely reflects all items discussed and agreed upon. Thank you again for allowing Clairemont Equipment to assist you with your equipment needs.

Sincerely,
Terry Rose
Executive Vice President
912-257-0068
[email protected]
Pg 151
151
SERVING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SINCE 1970
Komatsu WA320-8
RFQ Compliance Review and Response Package
Prepared for: City of California City - Front Wheel Loader Quote Review RFQ requirement-by-requirement review
RFQ Requirement WA320-8 Response Source / Note
Year: 2026 New current 2026 production unit for delivery in 2026. Model family is WA320-8.
new machine year
delivered.

Engine: Tier 4 Diesel Meets. Komatsu SAA6D107E-3, EPA Tier 4 Final diesel. Brochure pp. 3-4, 14.

Horsepower: at least 175 net
WA320-8 is 165 net HP max power is 170 HP (gross). Next model WA380 up would be 191 net HP and larger machine at 41,000 lbs operating weight which would be too large for required bucket size.

Brochure p. 1, 3, 14;
Komatsu product
page.

Transmission: 5-Speed WA320-8 uses hydrostatic transmission with 4 forward and 4 reverse speed ranges.

Brochure p. 14 and
standard equipment
listing.

Coupler: Manual / Coupler:

Standard No Coupler – Pin on bucket Brochure p. 16.

Cab: Enclosed with heat and
AC Meets. Enclosed ROPS/FOPS cab with auto air conditioner. Brochure pp. 6, 16.

Seat: Basic Partial. Standard seat is upgraded heated air-suspension type, not a basic mechanical seat. Brochure pp. 3, 6, 16.

Seatbelts: 3 in. standard Meets. Two-point retractable, 3 in. width. Brochure p. 16.

No radio WA320-8 standard equipment includes Bluetooth AM/FM radio with microphone and auxiliary input jack Brochure pp. 7, 16.

Visibility: Standard Meets. Standard mirrors plus standard rearview camera/monitor improve visibility. Brochure pp. 7, 16.

Steering: Standard hydraulic Meets. Fully hydraulic articulated steering. Brochure p. 14.

Pg 152
152
SERVING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SINCE 1970
Levers and joysticks:

Standard Meets. Standard Multi-Function Monolever. Brochure pp. 8, 16.

Axles: Standard Meets. Standard semi-floating axles per published specification. Brochure p. 14.

Fenders and steps: Standard Meets. Front fenders standard; access steps and handholds standard.

Brochure pp. 8, 11,

16. Lights: LEDs Meets. LED lights standard. Brochure p. 16.

No remote start Meets / no remote start identified in standard equipment.

No remote start
listed in brochure
standard equipment.

Counterweight: Standard Meets. Standard and additional counterweight listed. Brochure p. 16.

Mirrors: Standard Meets. Outside (2) and inside (2) mirrors standard. Brochure p. 16.

Bucket: GP, 3.25 CY heaped,
60 in. wide minimum, BOCE
WA320-8 offers GP bucket sizes within capacity range,
including 3.27 yd3 heaped with quick coupler. All published loader buckets shown are 9 ft 0 in wide, not 60 in. Machine can exceed the minimum capacity but not match a 60 in.
width. BOCE is standard.

Brochure pp. 14-15.

Dump height: 9 ft minimum Meets. Published dump clearances range from 9 ft 0 in to 11 ft 7 in depending on bucket/boom configuration. Brochure p. 15.

Rims: Standard Meets. Standard rims for 20.5R25 tires. Brochure p. 16.

Tires: Standard Meets. Standard tire/rim package published for 20.5R25. Brochure pp. 14-16.

Warranty: 3 years or 3,000
hours
Clarification needed. Komatsu states standard warranty on all machines and Komatsu Care complimentary scheduled
maintenance for 3 years / 2,000 hours. Price includes
powertrain plus warranty for 3 years/3000 hours.

Komatsu warranty
and maintenance
pages; brochure p.

13. Delivery included to
California City, CA Delivery included. Not a brochure spec.

Training included in price
Komatsu offers operator, technical, service and technology training programs; dealer includes on-site
familiarization/operator training in selling price.

Komatsu training
page and brochure p.

13. Pg 153
153
SERVING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SINCE 1970
Manuals: two hard copies
and one flash drive
Komatsu provides manuals and machine information are
accessible through My Komatsu; (2) hard-copy and flashdrive package will be included.

My Komatsu /
product support
references.

Attachments: none, only
standard bucket
Meets with proper configuration. Quote includes standard bucket only and no auxiliary attachment package unless
required.

Brochure bucket and
options listing.

Taxes: include 8.25% Included Not a brochure spec.

CONFIGURATION
WA320-8 KOMATSU WHEEL LOADER

STANDARD BOOM

COUNTERWEIGHT ADDITIONAL

ENGINE INTAKE, STD

BKT CYL, STD

KOMATSU HYD QUICK COUPLER
(X4) TIRE ONLY 20.5R25 XHA L3 MICHELIN
4 RIMS 20.5 R25 FOR TIRE ONLY
WA320 GP PIN ON BKT 3.25YD
2-SPOOLS VALVE, STANDARD

ATTACHMENTS
No Attachments

AMOUNT TO FINANCE

Taxable Amount $223,837.71
Sales Tax 8.25% $18,466.61
Subtotal $242,304.32

Sale Price $223,837.71
Total Amount $242,304.32

WARRANTY
Pg 154
154
SERVING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SINCE 1970
Machine comes standard with factory scheduled maintenance for the first 3 years/2,000 hours
POWERTRAIN PLUS HOURS: 3000 MONTHS: 36 Included

CONDITIONS
This sales quote is good for 15 days and is governed by the sales agreement terms and conditions here: Clairemont Terms & Conditions. The terms and conditions are in effect upon the customer’s signature and date below, or the Customer’s signature with all materials incorporated by reference on the sales agreement. Due to potential changes in tariff regulations, a tariff-related surcharge may be applied.

Signature: ___________________________________
Print: _______________________________________
Date: ___________________
Pg 155
155
SERVING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SINCE 1970
Machine Specifications - Komatsu WA320-8
(The Machine Specifications listed below may differ from what is on the unit presented in this document.

Where differences may occur, the “Price & Configuration” section presents the accurate description of the unit offered) Standard Equipment for Base Machine
Engine and related items: Equipment Management Monitoring System (EMMS) Air cleaner, dry-type, two stage, radial sealed Monitor: Multi-fuction, 7 inch, LCD, color high-resolution Engine shut-off system, electric with key Warning Message System with Descriptions Engine, Komatsu SAA6D107E-3, 6 cylinder, turbocharged, air to Gauges air after cooled, cooled EGR, direct injection Tier 4 Final emissions
• DEF Level
certified, diesel • Engine water temperature
Gross HP: 170HP (127kW) / 2100 RPM (SAE J1995) • ECO
Net HP: 165HP (123kW) / 2100 RPM (SAEJ1349) ISO / 9249 • Fuel level Max HP: 173HP (129kW) / 1900 RPM (ISO 14396) • HST oil temperature Exhaust pipe, curved • Speedometer / Tachometer
Fan, auto-reversing, hydraulic-driven Pilot Lights
KDPF - After-Treatment Assembly Consisting of KDOC and KCSF • Auxiliary steering (opt) Komatsu Auto Idle Shutdown • Brake oil pressure
SCR - Selective Catalytic Reduction aftertreatment with • Central warning DEF tank and heated lines • Cooling fan reverse
Starting aid, intake manifold preheater • DEF Level
Electrical system: • Directional indicator
Alternator, 90 ampere, 24 volt • ECSS
Back-up alarm • Engine pre heater
Batteries, 2 x 12 volt (92 Ah) (680 CCA) • Head lamp high beam Battery disconnect switch • HST Emergency pump drive
Horn, electric • KDPF restriction indicator
Lights • Komtrax message
• Back-up light, rear, LED • Parking brake warning
• Stop and tail, LED • Quick coupler lock release (opt) • Turn signal, (2 front, 2 rear) with hazard switch • Remote Boom & Bucket Positioner • Working lights, halogen (2 front, high low • Seat belt caution beam with indicator, fender mount, 2 rear grill mount • Steering oil pressure Pg 156
156
SERVING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SINCE 1970
• Working lights, halogen (2 front) • Traction level
outside of cab mount • Transmission speed range
Sealed DT electrical connectors • Turn signal
Starting motor, 5.5 kW direct electric, 24 V • Work equipment lock warning Power Train and Controls: Special arrangements:

Differentials, torque proportioning, inboard planetary Ambient Temperature Range, -20°C (-4°F) Parking brake, wet multiple disc through +45°C (+113°F) at maximum standard elevation Service brakes, hydraulic, wet multiple disc, axle by axle (inboard) of 2,300 meters (7,546 ft.) Transmission, hydrostatic, 1 pump, 2 motors, full auto Other Standard Equipment:
shift with speed range control Boom kick-out, automatic, in-cab adjustable Transmission control Bucket and lift cylinders
• F/R: steering column / loader control lever selectable Bucket positioner, automatic, in-cab adjustable, 3 position • Max speed control: electric, 4 speed F/R Centralized grease banks • Traction control: electric, 3 mode Counterweight, standard and additional Operator environment: Electronically Controlled Suspension System (ECSS) Cab, (ROPS/FOPS) (installed), includes; adjustable arm Fenders, front & partial rear rests, adjustable work equipment levers, cigarette lighter/ Hand rails, front, LH & RH ashtray, dome light, electrically heated rear window, air KOMTRAX, Level 5 conditioner / heater / defroster / pressurizer, floor mat, Lifting eyes front (intermittent) and rear wiper/washer, rearview mirrors Parallel loader linkage and standard lift boom '(2 outside, 2 inside), right hand and left hand door access Provision for Quick Coupler (mount points for piping, with steps and sunvisor harness for cab switch)
Hydraulic control, 2 spool (boom/bucket), multi-function mono lever
Rims for 20.5-25 tires (4 each)
control, with integrated transmission F/R switch and includes Vandalism Protection:
integrated third spool proportional switch (3 spool is optional) • Caplock & cover for fuel tank & hydraulic tank Monitor, 7 inch, LCD, color • Padlocks
Radio, AM/FM with speakers and auxiliary jack • Battery boxes Rear view monitor • Engine hood side panels & rear grill, lockable Seat, heated air suspension type, reclining with armrests (fabric) • Radiator cap cover (bolted) Seat belt, 3" width, retractable • Transfer case oil filler cover Steering wheel, tiltable, telescopic Voltage converter (12 volt, 5 amp x 2) Pg 157
157
SERVING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SINCE 1970
Komatsu Care - Complimentary Maintenance Program
Komatsu CARE comes standard on all eligible Tier 4 construction equipment. When you own and operate a piece of Komatsu Tier 4 construction equipment, you can expect more than a high-tech, hard-working machine. You can also expect a strong commitment from Komatsu and Clairemont Equipment to deliver an ownership experience that’s second to none.

We call it Komatsu CARE — a complete service and advanced product support solution that Komatsu provides our customers for the life of the machine. Komatsu CARE features our exclusive complimentary scheduled maintenance program: Every Komatsu Tier 4 Interim construction equipment machine comes standard with Komatsu Care complimentary factory scheduled maintenance for the first 3 years/2,000 hours (whichever occurs first). Eligible Komatsu Tier 4 construction machine comes standard with factory scheduled maintenance for the first 3 years/2,000 hours. Machines with one KDPF assembly are eligible for one Complimentary KDPF exchange during the first 5 years or 4,500 hours (whichever occurs first) from machine Fist-in-Dirt Date. Machines with two KDPF assemblies are eligible for one Complimentary exchange of both KDPF assemblies during the first 5 years of 4,500 hours (whichever occurs first) from machine Fist-in-Dirt Date. SCR maintenance service for the first 5 years/ 4,500 hours, whichever occurs first, are also included under Komatsu CARE.

Komatsu Care Plus, Komatsu Care Plus II and Komatsu Care Plus III are also available. (Based on model. Exclusions apply.) Pg 158
158
SERVING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SINCE 1970
KOMTRAX – Remote Monitoring System
KOMTRAX is Komatsu’s state of the art wireless monitoring system. You can monitor essential information, updated, and transmitted on a regular basis, about your Komatsu machines directly on your computer, smartphone or tablet. Komtrax is standard equipment on most new Komatsu machines. Free monitoring services are offered to the original owner and are transferable under most circumstances if necessary. This program allows you to locate equipment on large jobsites or around your territory, monitor machine movement, determine which operators are more efficient in which situations, track fuel consumption, identify operator use and habits, and chart daily hours of operation. With operational reports you can see how many hours your machine spent in various modes of operation such as digging, traveling, hydraulic relief, power mode, economy mode, lifting mode, and more.

KOMTRAX Plus from Komatsu is an advanced remote monitoring system for mining equipment. KOMTRAX Plus has the unique ability to retain a history of normal system operating parameters. Because every machine establishes its own norms, deviations from these norms can alert you to the need to be proactive thus avoiding expensive down time and after failure repairs. Another KOMTRAX Plus feature is Pay Load Meter (PLM). PLM is standard on mining and quarry sized haul trucks.

PLM provides carry weight, haul cycles and haul cycle details. PLM data is designed to help increase production. KOMTRAX Plus and PLM's comprehensive data sets are all designed to help you prolong machine life, improve efficiencies, and increase production.

Pg 159
159
Pg 160
160
Pg 161
161
Pg 162
162
Pg 163
163
Pg 164
164
Pg 165
165
Pg 166
166
Pg 167
167
Pg 168
168
Pg 169
169
Pg 170
170
Pg 171
171
Pg 172
172
Pg 173
173
Pg 174
174
Pg 175
175
Pg 176
176
Pg 177
177
Pg 178
178
Pg 179
179
Pg 180
180
Pg 181
181
Invoice # 001-0
Date 4/2/2026
Time 12:32 PM
PO #: 721G
Document #: 001-7262
Due Date: 5/10/2026
Salesman: Dennis Monahan
Ship Via:

Terms: Net 10th
CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY (6514)
21000 HACIENDA BLVD
CALIFORNIA CITY CA 93505-2293
Contact: JOE BARRIGAN @ 760.373.7162
Ship To:

Wholegood Sales Order
Reprint
Item Number Sales Extended Back Drop
Description Qty Price Amount Disc Subtotal Tax Amount Order Ship EQUIPMENT QUOTE:

CASE 721G Z-BAR WHEEL
LOADER 1.00 $249,570.00 $249,570.00 $249,570.00 $20,589.53 $270,159.53 2026 CASE 721G WHEEL LOADER
ENGINE MODEL: FPT F4HFE613T
ENGINE YEAR: 2026
HORSE POWER: 195-GROSS/179-NET

DIESEL OXIDATION CATALYST
ENGINE FAMILY: KFPXL06.7SOB
782440 CAB w/HEATER & A/C
469491 3" SEAT BELT
424225 5-SPEED TRANSMISSION
734073 CLOTH HEATED AIR SUSPENSION SEAT
782774 HEADREST
482585 COOLING SYSTEM w/REVERSING FAN
734114 Z-BAR LINKAGE
734154 ENHANCED VISIBILTY PACKAGE
734068 LED HEADLIGHTS, 4-FRONT & 2-REAR WORK LIGHTS
782203 R/L EXTERIOR REAR VIEW MIRRORS
424234 REAR VIEW CAMERA
782777 OPERATOR'S CONVENIENCE PACKAGE
782441 STANDARD HYDRAULIC STEERING
734054 3-SPOOL VALVE - JOYSTICK & LEVER
424240 3.25 CU/ YD PIN-ON BUCKET
424250 FULL LENGTH BOLT-ON CUTTING EDGE
782510 STD. FENDERS w/LH & RH STEPS
782108 4-CORNER AMBER STROBE
726013 REMOTE JUMP START
482105 ENGLISH LITERATURE
424911 LOCKING HYDRAULICS
482059 HEAVY COUNTERWEIGHT
782897 REAR FRAME SIDE COVERS
734139 PAYLOAD SYSTEM READY
482444 STANDARD WEATHER PACKAGE
482588 GALAXY BRAND
9420540 20.5x25, L-2 BIAS TIRES
461742 TELEMATICS SERVICE - 5-YR ADVANCED SUBSCRIPTION
461680 CASE SITEWATCH - TELEMATICS
WARRANTY: 3-YEAR/3000 HOURS w/FULL COVERAGE
PRO CARE: 3-YEAR/2,000-HOUR OEM SERVICES
INCLUDES: DELIVERY TO CUSTOMER LOCATION
Printed:4/2/2026 12:48 PM

Pg 182
182
Invoice # 001-0
Date 4/2/2026
Time 12:32 PM
PO #: 721G
Document #: 001-7262
Due Date: 5/10/2026
Salesman: Dennis Monahan
Ship Via:

Terms: Net 10th
CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY (6514)
21000 HACIENDA BLVD
CALIFORNIA CITY CA 93505-2293
Contact: JOE BARRIGAN @ 760.373.7162
Ship To:

Wholegood Sales Order
Reprint
Item Number Sales Extended Back Drop
Description Qty Price Amount Disc Subtotal Tax Amount Order Ship NOTES FOR QUOTE:

PARTS/SERVICE MANUALS 1.00
INCLUDED WITH THE DELOIVERY OF THE WHEEL LOADER ARE TWO (2) EACH SERVICE & PARTS MANUALS PLUS A FLASH DRIVE COPY.

NOTES FOR QUOTE:

STANDARD 3.50 CU/YD
LOADER BUCKET 1.00
IN LIEU OF THE 3.25 CU/YD LOADER BUCKET THE STANDARD BUILD 3.50 CU/YD LOADER BUCKET IS AVAILABLE AT A SAVINGS OF $2,310.00 Cash Check/Check# CC/CC Type On Acct. Mfg Credit CIT Deposit Other $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Summary of Charges
$249,570.00 Taxable
$0.00 Non-Taxable
$249,570.00 Subtotal
$20,589.53 Sales Tax
$270,159.53 Total
$0.00 Amount Tendered
$0.00 Change Due
This offer to sell is good for a period of thirty days or less, if specified. Once accepted, it forms a binding sales agreement. There is no cooling-off period. Should you accept this offer in writing by executing this Wholegoood Sales Order. where indicated below, and later decide to cancel your purchase, Sequoia will make a good faith effort to cancel the order to purchase with the manufacturer. However, should Sequoia not be able to cancel the order with the manufacturer, then your deposit is only refundable after the subject equipment is sold to a third party. All costs incurred by Sequoia in connection with this equipment/transaction will be accounted for and deducted from your deposit once the subject equipment is sold to a third party. Any remaining funds from the deposit will then be returned to you.

Exempt Tax Cert #:

Customer Signature Date Expiration Date:

Printed:4/2/2026 12:48 PM

Pg 183
183
NB 1
4930-8279-8751 v1

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Joe Barragan, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Approve Resolutions Authorizing BHT Task Orders to Tie-In Well 16 to the Transmission Line and the Rehabilitation of Well 15A
BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

The City currently only pumps water from two ground wells (Well 14 and Well 2A). In 2020, the water department was able to use six wells to feed water into the City’s water system. Well 3 (emergency well) and Well 10 have been down since 2020. Well 15A started producing less flow in 2023. Well 16 creates too much pressure for the City’s water system. Multiple times when Well 16 was turned on, it caused major water blowouts in the first community.

The current situation is unsustainable, and eventually, these Wells will go out because they are being overworked. Staff has been working on several projects to resolve this issue in the long term, but in the meantime, a good long-term solution is to tie Well 16 into the transmission line so that staff can start using Well 16 again. This will require a new 12” waterline that will run about 2,200 feet. This project needs to be engineered and submitted to the State Water Board for approval. BHT, the City’s engineer, has provided the City with a Task order to design, submit plans to the water board for approval, put the project out to bid, manage the project, and close out the project. BHT’s Task Order is for $53,950.

Staff have also been working to get Well 15A functional again. To assess the issue, the staff contracted Bakerfield Well and Pump (BWP) to pull and inspect the well pump and pipe casing.

As part of their work, BWP completed a full video inspection of the well’s interior. The inspection determined that both the pump and the pipe casing require rehabilitation to restore proper water production levels. The cost is $124,981.

The city's ability to pump from only two wells poses a concern, particularly as we enter the summer months, and with the detention now fully operational, increasing overall system demand. Both of these projects are crucial to ensure the City maintains an adequate water supply and system reliability. Restoring Well 15A’s production capacity and connecting Well 16 to the transmission line will support peak season demand and help stabilize the system as usage increases.

FISCAL IMPACT:
2025-26 Fiscal Budget GL# 51-5115-315 $ 53,950
2025-26 Fiscal Budget GL# 51-5115-740 $124,981
Pg 184
184
NB 1
4930-8279-8751 v1
These are emergency projects that were not anticipated in the FY Budget 2025-26. These projects will be funded by surplus g/l’s ending 630 & 745.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the two proposed resolutions authorizing the Interim City Manager to: 1) sign the BHT Task Order for $53,950; and 2) sign an agreement with BWP for $124,98.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 3234

2. Resolution 3235

3. BHT Task Order

4. BWP Quote

5. CC Agreement Template

6. Well 15A Inspection Reports
Pg 185
185
4900-1538-6271 v1 Page 1 of 2

RESOLUTION NO. 26-3234

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CALIFORNIA CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE

AN AGREEMENT WITH BAKERSFIELD WELL AND PUMP FOR WELL
15A REHABILITATION
The City Council of the City of California City (hereafter referred to as the “City”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City currently only pumps water from two ground wells; and WHEREAS, the current situation is unsustainable, and eventually, these Wells will go out because they are being overworked; and
WHEREAS, Well 15A started producing less flow in 2023; and WHEREAS, to assess the issue, the staff contracted with Bakerfield Well and Pump (BWP) to pull and inspect the well pump and pipe casing; and WHEREAS, the inspection determined that both the pump and the pipe casing require rehabilitation to restore proper water production levels.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2: The City Council authorizes the Interim City Manager to sign the BWP agreement for $124,981, so the City can start pumping water from Well 15A again.

SECTION 3: City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of California City, this ___ day of _________________ 2026. __________________________
Marquette Hawkins
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________ __________________________
John Paul Maier Victor M. Ponto,
City Clerk City Attorney
Pg 186
186
4900-1538-6271 v1 Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATION
I, John Paul Maier, City Clerk of the City of California City, California, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a meeting of the City Council of said City at its meeting held on the ____ of ______________ 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of California City, California, this ____day of _________, 2026.

__________________________
John Paul Maier
City Clerk
Pg 187
187
4931-9860-1119 v1 Page 1 of 2

RESOLUTION NO. 26-3235

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CALIFORNIA CITY AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE BHT’S TASK ORDER RELATED TO THE TIE-IN OF WELL
16 TO THE TRANSMISSION LINE
The City Council of the City of California City (hereafter referred to as the “City”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City currently only pumps water from two ground wells; and WHEREAS, Well 16 creates too much pressure for the City’s water system; and WHEREAS, when Well 16 was turned on, multiple times it caused major water blowouts in the first community; and
WHEREAS, with the operation of the new detention center, the City needs to run the two current wells that are being used twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week; and
WHEREAS, the City being able to only pump out of two wells poses a concern, particularly as we enter the summer months, and with the detention now fully operational, increasing overall system demand; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Engineer, BHT, has submitted a task order to design, submit plans to the water board for approval, put the project out to bid, manage the project, and close out the project in the amount of $53,950.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2: The City Council authorizes the Interim City Manager to sign the BHT Task Order for $53,950 to design, submit plans to the water board for approval, put the project out to bid, manage the project, and close out the project.

SECTION 3: City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of California City, this ___ day of _________________ 2026.

Pg 188
188
4931-9860-1119 v1 Page 2 of 2

__________________________
Marquette Hawkins
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________ __________________________
John Paul Maier Victor M. Ponto,
City Clerk City Attorney

CERTIFICATION
I, John Paul Maier, City Clerk of the City of California City, California, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a meeting of the City Council of said City at its meeting held on the ____ of ______________ 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of California City, California, this ____day of _________, 2026.

__________________________
John Paul Maier
City Clerk
Pg 189
189
Staff Estimated
Hours Rate / hr. Total
Sr. Civil Engineer 6 $ 175.00 $ 1,050.00
Sr. Proj. Manager 10 $ 165.00 $ 1,650.00
Assistant Project
Manager
6 $ 115.00 $ 690.00
Two-Person
Survey Crew
16 $ 340.00 $ 5,440.00
Assistant Project
Manager
10 $ 110.00 $ 1,100.00
Sr. Civil Engineer 80 $ 175.00 $ 14,000.00
Sr. Proj. Manager 120 $ 165.00 $ 19,800.00
Assistant Project
Manager
40 $ 115.00 $ 4,600.00
Sr. Proj. Manager 20 $ 165.00 $ 3,300.00
Clerical 10 $ 70.00 $ 700.00
560 $ 0.75 $ 420.00
Subtotal= $ 52,750.00
Environmental CEQA Filing $ 1,200.00
Grand Total= $ 53,950.00
NOTES:

BHT Engineering, Inc. City of California City
Juan M. Pantoja, Principal Engineer Sean Grayson - Interim City Manager Date: 03/25/2026 Date:
*Construction Inspection / administration by City or separate Task Order. *This total estimated time is considered a maximum amount based on scope of work and expected course of construction. Additional cost as time and materials, which BHT Engineering, Inc. would work with the City.

Perform field engineering surveying of proposed site. Two men crew.

Perform preliminary and final project design to install a new 12-inch (Ø12") municipal potable water transmission/distribution main along the Great Circle Dr alignment shown on project plans. Work will includes trenching, piping installation, appurtenances, testing, backfilling, surface restoration, and all related tasks required for a complete and functional water system improvement. AWWA Standards, and State and local codes, environmental, and safety requirements
The signatures below shall serve as an authorization to proceed on Task Order from the City and is acknowledged by Consultant. • The work as described on this task order will be prioritized due to city's time constraints Mileage: 140 miles round trip x 4 times
Coordinate with City Staff for the advertisement and award of the project. Assist City in all aspects of the bidding process: including respond to RFIs, prepare addendums, attend and conduct pre-bid meeting, attend the bid opening, review bid results and qualify lowest responsible bidder, and make recommendations for awarding the construction contract.

The advertising costs are to be paid by the City directly to the advertising newspaper and are not included in this proposal.

Soils Report cost is not included
Environmental by City
Survey Existing Topographic conditions
Prepare Project Plans, Specifications, Estimates, Bid Preparation

SCOPE OF WORK
Bidding and Award of Project
Project Administration, Meetings and Coordination
Coordinate with City Staff for project’s concept and direction. Internal coordination meetings with city to ensure team members are current in project goals and criteria, as well as apprised of any project adjustments. This task includes project setup, coordination, budget/schedule monitoring, and invoicing.

March 25, 2026

FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
GREAT CIRCLE DR 12-IN WATER MAIN

TASK ORDER
BHT Engineering, Inc. will perform Preliminary Engineering design services as outline in Contract Agreement for General Engineer Services dated September 9, 2025 fee schedule
FROM WELL # 16 TO NEURALIA RD APPROX. 2,200 FEET
Pg 190
190
Bakersfield Well & Pump Co.
7212 Fruitvale Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93308
To: City of California City QUOTE
21000 Hacienda Blvd. 3/4/2026
California City, CA 93503 JOB # 26454
Attn: Accounts Payable PO #
(760) 687-8406 Art Van Dang/ (760) 338-8532 David
Job Description: Pull & Inspect @ Well 15
Item # Bid Item Description Qty Units Unit Bid Price
Qty
This
Period Period Total
Qty to
Date Total to Date
$ 1.00 Mobilization / Demobilization 1 LS $ 3,000.00 1 $ 3,000.00 1 $ 3,000.00 2 12" x 10' Column Pipe 29 EA $ 923.00 33 $ 30,459.00 33 $ 30,459.00 3 12" x 5 Column Pipe 1 EA $ 654.00 1 $ 654.00 1 $ 654.00 4 10" x 5' Column Pipe 1 EA $ 538.00 1 $ 538.00 1 $ 538.00 5 12" x 2" Retainers 55 EA $ 421.00 55 $ 23,155.00 55 $ 23,155.00 6 12LC-11 Stage 1 LS $ 24,575.00 1 $ 24,575.00 1 $ 24,575.00 7 12" Discharge Head 1 LS $ 4,500.00 1 $ 4,500.00 1 $ 4,500.00 8 Scratch / Bail 8 GAL 450.00 8 $ 3,600.00 8 $ 3,600.00 9 Acid 110 HRS $ 60.00 110 $ 6,600.00 110 $ 6,600.00
10 Scratch / Bail 16 EA $ 450.00 16 $ 7,200.00 16 $ 7,200.00 11 Video 1 EA $ 1,800.00 1 $ 1,800.00 1 $ 1,800.00
12 Reinstall 540 FT $ 35.00 540 $ 18,900.00 540 $ 18,900.00 13 $ - $ -
14 $ - $ -
TOTALS $ 124,981.00 $ 124,981.00
Ruben Baltierra
John C. Zimmerer
Art Van Dang/David
Amount Earned $ 124,981.00
Amount Retained @ 10% (12,498.10) $
Previous Billing(s)
Total Due $ 112,482.90
Date
Total To Date
QUOTE
Prepared By: ________________________________________________________________ Date
Signed By: __________________________________________________________________ Date
Approved By: _______________________________________________________________ https://bwandpumps.sharepoint.com/sites/Operations/Shared Documents/Jobs/2026/26454 Calif City - Pull & Inspect Well #15 @ CA City Blvd & Neuralia Rd (California City)/Inv 26454 02- 12-26.xlsxQuote Page 1 of 1
Pg 191
191
1 CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY

PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT

1. PARTIES AND DATE.

This Professional Services Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this _____ day of ________, 20___, by and between the City of California City, a municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business at 21000 Hacienda Blvd., California City, CA 93505 ("City") and [INSERT NAME OF COMPANY], a [INSERT TYPE OF BUSINESS; I.E., CORPORATION (INCLUDE

STATE OF INCORPORATION), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP, ETC.], with its principal place of business at [INSERT ADDRESS] ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."

2. RECITALS.

2.1 Consultant.

Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional [INSERT TYPE] consulting services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing professional [INSERT TYPE] consulting services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of City.

2.2 Project.

City desires to engage Consultant to render such professional [INSERT TYPE] consulting services for the [INSERT NAME OF PROJECT, AND CONTRACT NUMBER, IF APPLICABLE] project ("Project") as set forth in this Agreement.

3. TERMS.

3.1 Scope of Services and Time of Performance.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional [INSERT TYPE] consulting services necessary for the Project ("Services"). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. [INSERT IF FEDERAL FUNDS WILL BE USED; OTHERWISE ALWAYS DELETE:

Additionally, Consultant shall comply with all Federal requirements applicable to the Services as set forth in Exhibit “A-I.”]

3.1.2 Time of Performance. Consultant shall perform its services in a prompt and timely manner and shall commence performance immediately following execution of this Pg 192
192
2 Agreement by the Parties. Consultant shall complete the services required hereunder on or before [Insert date by which performance of the services must be completed – if more detail is required attach “Activity Schedule” as Exhibit D, otherwise delete Exhibit D.]

3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant.

3.2.1 Independent Contractor; Control and Payment of Subordinates. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee.

Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any of its officials, officers, directors, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance.

3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services.

3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.

3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: [INSERT NAME AND TITLE].

3.2.5 City's Representative. The City hereby designates [INSERT NAME AND TITLE], or his/her designee, to act as its representative in all matters pertaining to the Pg 193
193
3 administration and performance of this Agreement ("City's Representative"). City's Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for review and approval of all products submitted by Consultant but not the authority to enlarge the Scope of Work or change the total compensation due to Consultant under this Agreement. The City Manager shall be authorized to act on City's behalf and to execute all necessary documents which enlarge the Scope of Work or change the Consultant's total compensation subject to the provisions contained in Section 3.3 of this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City Manager, City's Representative or his/her designee.

3.2.6 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates [INSERT NAME AND TITLE], or his/her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his/her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement.

3.2.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.

3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subconsultants shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subconsultants have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its sub-consultants who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project.

3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification Pg 194
194
4 provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.2.10 Insurance. [CONFER WITH XXXX PRIOR TO MAKING ANY DEVIATIONS TO THE FOLLOWING INSURANCE PROVISIONS]

3.2.10.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subconsultant has secured all insurance required under this section.

3.2.10.2 Types of Insurance Required. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder, and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, the Consultant, in partial performance of its obligations under such Agreement, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the Agreement the following policies of insurance. If the existing policies do not meet the insurance requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the policies to do so.
(A) Commercial General Liability: Commercial General
Liability Insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office "occurrence" form CG 0001, or the exact equivalent, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and no less than $2,000,000 in the general aggregate. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits. The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions (1) limiting coverage for contractual liability; (2) excluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another (cross-liability); or (3) containing any other exclusion(s) contrary to the terms or purposes of this Agreement.
(B) Automobile Liability Insurance: Automobile Liability Insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CA 0001 covering "Any Auto" (Code 1), or if Consultant has no owned autos, “Hired Auto” (Code 8) and “NonOwned Auto” (Code 9), or the exact equivalent, covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities with limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined limit for each occurrence. [***NOTE: If Consultant does not own any company vehicles or may not be able to purchase a Business Automobile Insurance Policy, the requirement may be satisfied by providing either of the following: (1) a Personal Automobile Liability policy for the Consultant's own vehicle stipulating "Automobile Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 each accident"; or (2) a non-owned auto endorsement to the Commercial General Liability policy if Consultant uses vehicles of others (e.g., vehicles of employees). ALWAYS DELETE THIS SECTION IF NOT USED.***]
(C) Workers' Compensation/Employer’s Liability: Workers' Compensation Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease. If Consultant has no employees or agents, Consultant shall not be required to maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance. However, in the event that Consultant hires employees or agents Pg 195
195
5 during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain and maintain Workers’ Compensation/Employer’s Liability Insurance in accordance with this section. [OPTIONAL: include the following provision if services are with a professional where Errors & Omissions Coverage is required/ needed; otherwise, always delete.] (D) Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions) [***NOTE:

City to determine whether coverage limit is sufficient on a case by case basis. If in doubt, consult with your risk management or insurance advisors***]: Professional Liability insurance or Errors & Omissions insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession with limits of not less than $1,000,000. Covered professional services shall specifically include all work to be performed under the Agreement and delete any exclusions that may potentially affect the work to be performed (for example, any exclusions relating to lead, asbestos, pollution, testing, underground storage tanks, laboratory analysis, soil work, etc.). If coverage is written on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of the initial Agreement and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting period will be exercised for a period of at least three (3) years from termination or expiration of this Agreement. [OPTIONAL: Include the following provision if there is a pollution liability exposure; otherwise, always delete.]
(E) Pollution Liability [***NOTE: City to determine
whether coverage limit is sufficient on a case by case basis. If in doubt, consult with your risk management or insurance advisors***]: Pollution Liability Insurance covering all of the consultant’s operations to include onsite and offsite coverage for bodily injury (including death and mental anguish), property damage, defense costs and cleanup costs with limits of not less than $5,000,000 per loss and $10,000,000 total all losses. The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting contractual liability or coverage for cross liability of claims or suits by one insured against another. If coverage is written on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of the initial Agreement and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting period will be exercised for a period of at least three (3) years from termination or expiration of this Agreement. [ALWAYS DELETE IF NOT USED]

3.2.10.3 Insurance Endorsements. Required insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the City to add the following provisions to the insurance policies:
(A) Commercial General Liability [INSERT "and Pollution Liability"; OTHERWISE, ALWAYS DELETE]:
(1) Additional Insured: The City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits or claims arising out of the performance of the Agreement.

Additional Insured Endorsements shall not (1) be restricted to "ongoing operations"; (2) exclude "contractual liability"; (3) restrict coverage to "sole" liability of Consultant; or (4) contain any other exclusions contrary to the terms or purposes of this Agreement. For all policies of Commercial General Liability insurance, Consultant shall provide endorsements in the form of Pg 196
196
6 ISO CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01 (or endorsements providing the exact same coverage) to effectuate this requirement.
(2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (B) Automobile Liability:
(1) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (C) Workers' Compensation:
(1) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (2) Waiver of Subrogation: A waiver of subrogation
stating that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers.
[OPTIONAL: include the following provision if services are with a professional where Errors & Omissions Coverage is required/ needed; otherwise, always delete.] (D) Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions):
(1) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (2) Contractual Liability Exclusion Deleted: This
insurance shall include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and include a provision establishing the insurer’s duty to defend.

3.2.10.4 Primary and Non-Contributing Insurance. All policies of Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance shall be primary and any other insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall not contribute with this primary insurance. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.

Pg 197
197
7 3.2.10.5 Waiver of Subrogation. All policies of Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance shall contain or be endorsed to waive subrogation against the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to effect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. Consultant shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.

3.2.10.6 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be approved in writing by the City and shall protect the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers in the same manner and to the same extent as they would have been protected had the policy or policies not contained a deductible or selfinsured retention.

3.2.10.7 Evidence of Insurance. The Consultant, concurrently with the execution of the Agreement, and as a condition precedent to the effectiveness thereof, shall deliver either certified copies of the required policies, or original certificates on forms approved by the City, together with all endorsements affecting each policy. Required insurance policies shall not be in compliance if they include any limiting provision or endorsement that has not been submitted to the City for approval. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least fifteen (15 days) prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced and not replaced immediately so as to avoid a lapse in the required coverage, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies.

3.2.10.8 Failure to Maintain Coverage. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced immediately so as to avoid a lapse in the required coverage, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement effective upon notice.

3.2.10.9 Acceptability of Insurers. Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and authorized to transact business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law.

Pg 198
198
8 3.2.10.10 Enforcement of Agreement Provisions (non estoppel).

Consultant acknowledges and agrees that actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligation on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.

3.2.10.11 Requirements Not Limiting. Requirement of specific coverage or minimum limits contained herein are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums contained herein, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

3.2.10.12 Claims Made Policies. If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis:
(A) The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the effective date of the Agreement or the beginning of work under this Agreement. (B) Such insurance must be maintained and evidence of
insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of all services under this Agreement.
(C) If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the effective date of the Agreement, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of all services under this Agreement.

3.2.10.13 Special Risks or Circumstances. City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

3.2.10.14 Insurance for Subconsultants. Consultant shall include all subconsultants engaged in any work for Consultant relating to this Agreement as additional insureds under the Consultant's policies, or the Consultant shall be responsible for causing subconsultants to purchase the appropriate insurance in compliance with the terms of these Insurance Requirements, including adding the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds to the subconsultant's policies. All policies of Commercial General Liability insurance provided by Consultant’s subconsultants performing work relating to this Agreement shall be endorsed to name the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds using endorsement form ISO CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing equivalent coverage. Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract relating to this Agreement until it has received satisfactory evidence of subconsultant’s compliance with all insurance requirements under this Agreement, to the extent applicable. The Consultant shall provide satisfactory evidence of compliance with this section upon request of the City.

Pg 199
199
9 3.2.11 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions, where applicable, shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subconsultants, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.

3.2.12 Water Quality Management and Compliance.

3.2.12.1 Storm Water Management. Storm, surface, nuisance, or other waters may be encountered at various times during the Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it has investigated the risk arising from such waters, and assumes any and all risks and liabilities arising therefrom.

3.2.12.2 Compliance with Water Quality Laws, Ordinances and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself and all subcontractors, staff, and employees fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations that may impact, or be implicated by the performance of the Services including, without limitation, all applicable provisions of the City’s ordinances regulating water quality and storm water; the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq.); the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Water Code § 13000 et seq.); and any and all regulations, policies, or permits issued pursuant to any such authority. Consultant shall additionally comply with the lawful requirements of the City, and any other water district, municipality, drainage district, or other local agency with jurisdiction over the location where the Services are to be conducted, regulating water quality and storm water discharges.

3.2.12.3 Standard of Care. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the work assigned to them without impacting water quality in violation of the laws, regulations and policies described in Section 3.2.12.2 of this Agreement. Consultant further warrants that it, its employees and subcontractors have or will receive adequate training, as determined by the City, regarding these requirements as they may relate to the Services.

3.2.12.4 Liability for Non-compliance.
(A) Indemnity: Failure to comply with laws, regulations, and ordinances listed in Section 3.2.12.2 of this Agreement is a violation of federal and state law.

Notwithstanding any other indemnity contained in this Agreement, Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees and authorized volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses or liabilities of any kind or nature which the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees and authorized volunteers may sustain or incur for noncompliance with the laws, regulations, and ordinances listed above, Pg 200
200
10 arising out of or in connection with the Services, except for liability resulting from the sole established negligence, willful misconduct or active negligence of the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees or authorized volunteers.
(B) Defense: City reserves the right to defend any enforcement action or civil action brought against the City for Consultant’s failure to comply with any applicable water quality law, regulation, or policy. Consultant hereby agrees to be bound by, and to reimburse the City for the costs associated with, any settlement reached between the City and the relevant enforcement entity.
(C) Damages: City may seek damages from Consultant for
delay in completing the Services caused by Consultant’s failure to comply with the laws, regulations and policies described in Section 3.2.12.2 of this Agreement, or any other relevant water quality law, regulation, or policy.

3.3 Fees and Payments.

3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed [INSERT AMOUNT WRITTEN OUT] ($[INSERT NUMBER]) without written approval of the City Council or City Manager as applicable. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.

3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly invoice which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The invoice shall describe the amount of Services provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the invoice.

City shall, within 30 days of receiving such invoice, review the invoice and pay all non-disputed and approved charges thereon. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees, the City shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth therein.

3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City, or included in Exhibit "C" of this Agreement.

3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from the City.

3.3.5 Rate Increases. In the event that this Agreement is renewed pursuant to Section 3.1.2, the rate set forth in Exhibit “C” may be adjusted each year at the time of renewal as set forth in Exhibit “C.”
Pg 201
201
11 3.4 California Labor Code Provisions.

3.4.1 Prevailing Wage Law. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall obtain a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement from the website of the Division of Labor Statistics and Research of the Department of Industrial Relations located at www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/. In the alternative, Consultant may view a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages at the City.

Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

3.4.2 Registration. If the services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the project and require the same of any subconsultants. This project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements.

3.5 Accounting Records.

3.5.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

3.6 General Provisions.

3.6.1 Termination of Agreement.

Pg 202
202
12 3.6.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.

3.6.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.

3.6.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

3.6.1.4 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Consultant: [INSERT BUSINESS NAME]
[INSERT STREET ADDRESS]
[INSERT CITY STATE ZIP]
ATTN: [INSERT NAME AND TITLE]
City: City of California City
21000 Hacienda Blvd.

California City, California 93505
ATTN: [INSERT NAME AND TITLE]
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.6.2 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.

Pg 203
203
13 3.6.2.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subconsultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk.

3.6.2.2 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant.

Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.

3.6.2.3 Confidential Information. The City shall refrain from releasing Consultant’s proprietary information ("Proprietary Information") unless the City's legal counsel determines that the release of the Proprietary Information is required by the California Public Records Act or other applicable state or federal law, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction, in which case the City shall notify Consultant of its intention to release Proprietary Information.

Consultant shall have five (5) working days after receipt of the Release Notice to give City written notice of Consultant's objection to the City's release of Proprietary Information.

Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against all liability, loss, cost or expense (including attorney’s fees) arising out of a legal action brought to compel the release of Proprietary Information. City shall not release the Proprietary Information after receipt of the Objection Notice unless either:
(1) Consultant fails to fully indemnify, defend (with City's choice of legal counsel), and hold City harmless from any legal action brought to compel such release; and/or (2) a final and nonappealable order by a court of competent jurisdiction requires that City release such information.

3.6.3 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

Pg 204
204
14 3.6.4 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and all other costs of such action.

3.6.5 Indemnification.

3.6.5.1 Scope of Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel reasonably approved by the City), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, suits, actions, proceedings, costs, expenses, liability, judgments, awards, decrees, settlements, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, (collectively, “Claims’) in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages, expert witness fees and attorneys’ fees and other related costs and expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant’s services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to Claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers.

3.6.5.2 Additional Indemnity Obligations. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend, with counsel of City’s choosing and at Consultant’s own cost, expense and risk, any and all claims, suits, actions or other proceedings of every kind covered by Section 3.6.5.1 that may be brought or instituted against City or its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents as part of any such claim, suit, action or other proceeding. Consultant shall also reimburse City for the cost of any settlement paid by City or its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers as part of any such claim, suit, action or other proceeding. Such reimbursement shall include payment for City's attorney's fees and costs, including expert witness fees. Consultant shall reimburse City and its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and/or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided.

Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City, its directors, officials officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.

3.6.6 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties.

3.6.7 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Kern County.

Pg 205
205
15 3.6.8 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.6.9 City's Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project.

3.6.10 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

3.6.11 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

3.6.12 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subconsultants of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.

3.6.13 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.6.14 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.

3.6.15 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.6.16 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.6.17 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability.

Pg 206
206
16 For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

3.6.18 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

3.6.19 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake selfinsurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.6.20 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.

3.6.21 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

3.7 Subcontracting.

3.7.1 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.
[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY [INSERT NAME]
By: By:

Sean Grayson
Interim City Manager
[INSERT NAME AND TITLE]
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND
Pg 207
207
17 Secretary OR Treasurer REQUIRED]
ATTEST:

By:
[INSERT NAME AND TITLE
By:

City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Victor Ponto
City Attorney
Pg 208
208
1 OMLO: October 2018
EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Pg 209
209
1 OMLO: October 2018
EXHIBIT "A-I"

FEDERALLY REQUIRED PROVISIONS FOR SERVICES
[INSERT FEDERALLY REQUIRED PROVISIONS TRIGGERED BY RECEIPT OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR THE SERVICES; OTHERWISE
ALWAYS DELETE ENTIRE EXHIBIT “A-I”]
Pg 210
210
1 OMLO: October 2018
EXHIBIT "B"

SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
Pg 211
211
EXHIBIT "C"

COMPENSATION
[INSERT THE FOLLOWING PROVISION IF THE AGREEMENT WILL
AUTOMATICALLY RENEW: In the event that this Agreement is renewed pursuant to Section 3.1.2, the rates set forth above may be increased or reduced each year at the time of renewal, but any increase shall not exceed the Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, Los Angeles-Riverside-San Bernardino Counties.]
Pg 212
212
EXHIBIT “D”
Pg 213
213
DATE: JOB #: CUSTOMER:

WRITTEN BY: RACK: WELL NAME/NUMBER:

SERIAL NO:

NUMBER OF STAGES: MODEL NO:

IMPELLER WEAR: 1 5 9 13 AVERAGE WEAR: 0.1
2 6 10 14
3 7 11 15
4 8 12 16
1 5 9 13
2 6 10 14
3 7 11 15
4 8 12 16
BAD
BAD
SIZE: 1 11/16
BAD
BAD
BAD
SHAFT DIA:

TUBE: T/D:

THREAD:

SUGGESTIONS: REPLACE REPAIR x
FR-599255
9 12CMC

BOWL READ OUT
2/24/26 26454 Cal City
Ryan 15

0.1 BOWL MANUFACTURER: Christensen Pumps
na
SHAFT LENGTH:
impellars are all above .100" wear and uneven wear , impellar #4 is cracked , inside casing looks like getting brittle on top side COMMENTS:

GOOD x
IMPELLAR TRIM: 8.697 x 9.426
BOWL BUSHING:

BOWL SHAFT:

T/A BEARING:

BOWL CASES:
3/4"
brass
LATERAL:
x
x
x
BUSHING TYPE:

BEARING TYPE:

GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
NA
IMPELLARS:
1 11/16
NA
120 5/8
10" taper
10" butt
SUCTION SIZE:

DISCHARGE SIZE:

GOOD
STICK UP: 8 1/2"
#4
Pg 214
214
DATE: JOB #: CUSTOMER:

WRITTEN BY: RACK: WELL NAME/NUMBER:

COLUMN SIZE: THREAD: butt
DISCHARGE SIZE: SHAFT SIZE: TUBE SIZE: NA
SIZE

CONDITION
MOTOR HP: MOTOR MAKE: DRIVER: 1 15/16
MOTOR SERIAL: MEGGER CD: 42 1/2

PACKING NUT
24" pipe off head was cut then a 5' pipe was cut under it COMMENTS:

CONDITION
1 15/16
bad
200 US motors
9400895 849 R2115312 J3220259
NIPPLE: LENGTH 24' STUFFING BOX/

COLUMN TUBE AND SHAFT READ OUT
2/23/26 26454 Cal City
Pressly 46 & 83 15

DISCHARGE HEAD AND MOTOR
HEAD MANUFACTURER: Peerless 12"
12" 1 15/16
Pg 215
215
COLUMN TUBE AND SHAFT QTY: 49 @ 10'
2 @5'

QTY BAD QTY GOOD
29 20
1 0
1 0

TUBE SIZE

SHAFT SIZE
TUBE SIZE:

SHAFT SIZE:

SUCTION PIPE:
looks good
12"x5'
NA
1 15/16
butt
10"x5' butt 5 bad collars , 9 seams
Butt

COLUMN TUBE AND SHAFT

SIZE THREAD COMMENTS
12"x10'
10" x 5' pipe off bowl has a C/O collar 10"x12" , 12'x5' pipe to head was cut both bad , 51 in total retainers with 17 stuck in cut pipe , bushings were not check with NO-GO , pipe seperated on 2 racks 46=good and 83=bad , base of head has cracks some previously welded
COMMENTS:
10"
COLUMN SIZE(S): Water Lube pipe
15 pipe were torched off
Shafts are carbon steel W/SS sleeves
sleeves mic'd at 2.12
Taper surge valve with cone strainer
Pg 216
216
NB 2
4934-5654-9023 v1

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
April 14, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John Paul Maier, Deputy City Manager / City Clerk Christy Marie Lopez, Assistant City Attorney
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of California City, California, Adopting a City Council Decorum Policy BACKGROUND/ DISCUSSION:

The City of California seeks to promote an environment of professionalism, respect, and efficiency during public meetings. The proposed Decorum Policy has been developed to establish clear expectations for conduct among members of the City Council, staff, and the public.

The policy applies to all public meetings of the City Council, as well as commissions, committees, boards, and other public meetings. It provides a structured framework to ensure meetings are conducted in a manner that allows for full participation while maintaining order and decorum.

Key components of the Decorum Policy include:
• Standards of Conduct for Councilmembers:

Members are expected to avoid disruptions, refrain from side conversations, follow the Presiding Officer's directions, and maintain professionalism during meetings. • Public Participation Guidelines:

Members of the public are provided the opportunity to speak at designated times, with procedures in place to ensure orderly participation and accurate recordkeeping. • Authority of the Presiding Officer:

The Mayor or designated chair is responsible for maintaining order, ensuring discussions remain focused on agenda items, and enforcing time limits when necessary. • Disruption and Enforcement Procedures:

The policy defines disruptive behavior and outlines a clear enforcement process, including warnings, removal from meetings, and, if necessary, clearing the meeting room in extreme circumstances pursuant to State law.
• Alignment with Parliamentary Procedure:

Meetings are generally guided by Rosenberg’s Rules of Order, ensuring consistency with widely accepted standards for public meeting governance.

The proposed Decorum Policy reflects best practices in municipal governance and is consistent with California Government Code provisions, including Sections 54957.9 and 54957.95, which authorize legislative bodies to adopt and enforce rules to maintain order during public meetings.

Pg 217
217
NB 2
4934-5654-9023 v1
By clearly defining acceptable behavior and enforcement mechanisms, the policy strengthens the City Council’s ability to:
• Conduct efficient and productive meetings.
• Ensure fair and equal access to public participation. • Protect the rights of all attendees while preventing disruptions; and • Maintain public trust in the City’s decision-making process.

Additionally, the policy reinforces the role of the Presiding Officer and, when necessary, law enforcement in upholding meeting integrity. The City Council is requested to review, discuss, and revise the City Council Rules of Decorum as it is deemed appropriate.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None with this action.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of California City, California, approving a City Council Decorum Policy.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution for Rules of Decorum Policy

2. Exhibit A: Rules of Decorum Policy
Pg 218
218
RESOLUTION 26-3236
4916-7220-0351 v1