Calimesa City Council
July 18, 2022

CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: MAYOR DAVIS, MAYOR PRO TEM CERVANTEZ, COUNCIL MEMBER DUVALL, COUNCIL MEMBER HEWITT AND COUNCIL MEMBER MOLINA.

STAFF: CITY MANAGER JOHNSON, CITY ATTORNEY BARROW, CITY CLERK

GERDES, FINANCE DIRECTOR REID, PLANNING MANAGER LUCIA, PUBLIC

WORKS DIRECTOR MONSON, CITY ENGINEER THORNTON, FIRE CHIEF O’CONNELL AND SHERIFF CAPTAIN SALAS.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Regular Meeting of the Calimesa City Council
Meeting Agenda
Monday, July 18, 2022 – 6:00 p.m.

Norton Younglove Multipurpose Senior Center
908 Park Avenue, Calimesa, CA 92320
William Davis, Mayor  Jeff Cervantez, Mayor Pro Tem
Wynona Duvall, Council Member  Wendy Hewitt, Council Member  Linda Molina, Council Member Bonnie Johnson, City Manager  Quinn Barrow, City Attorney The Calimesa City Council will be conducting this meeting in the Norton Younglove Senior Center. Members of the public may participate in this meeting in one of two ways:
1) In person at the Norton Younglove Senior Center, 908 Park Avenue, Calimesa, CA 92320. 2) By viewing the meeting on Facebook Live, beginning at 6:00 p.m. at https://www.facebook.com/cityof.calimesa Submission of Public Comments: If attending the meeting, public comment will be allowed by completing a blue speaker slip and providing it to the City Clerk at the meeting. Please observe a time limit of three (3) minutes when giving your presentation. When called upon, please step forward to the microphone, state your name for the record, whom you represent and any statement you wish to make. Please be advised that you may not defer your three (3) minutes to another speaker. Otherwise, public comment will be accepted via email. Please send comments via email to the Calimesa City Clerk at [email protected]. Identify public comment or the specific agenda item you wish to comment on in your email’s subject line. You may submit comments on any agenda item. Emailed comments must be submitted by 5:30 p.m. on Monday, July 18, 2022 and will be read into the record by the City Clerk. Electronic comments on agenda items may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Clerk’s Office, (909) 795-9801. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

Any public writings distributed by the City to at least a majority of the Council Members regarding any item on this regular meeting agenda will be made available at the public counter at City Hall located at 908 Park Avenue, Calimesa, CA 92320.

COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Anyone wishing to address the Council on any item within the Council’s jurisdiction that is not on the agenda may do so at this time. This is not a time for City Council discussion of non-agenda items. After receiving public comments, Council Members or staff, after being recognized by the Mayor, may briefly respond to statements made by the public or questions posed by the public. In addition, Council Members may ask questions for clarification or make a referral to staff for factual information to be reported back to the Council at a later meeting.

APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
RECOMMENDATION: Move to approve the agenda
Motion____________________ Second____________________ Vote____________________ CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 – 13)
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. Any Council Member or staff member may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion.

1. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION MINUTES.
a) City Council action minutes of a regular meeting of June 20, 2022. b) City Council action minutes of a special meeting of June 29, 2022.

2. RECEIVE AND FILE CITY COMMISSION & BOARD MINUTES.
a) Planning Commission action minutes of June 13, 2022 regular meeting.

3. APPROVAL OF WARRANT REGISTERS.
a) Check Register Report with a total of $1,515,382.63 (Check Nos. 38815 to 38939) b) June 23, 2022 Payroll of $82,245.22
July 1, 2022 Council Payroll of $1,673.25
July 7, 2022 Payroll of $76,874.20

4. WAIVE FULL READING OF ANY PROPOSED ORDINANCES ON THE AGENDA.

This permits reading the title only in lieu of reciting the entire text of the Ordinances. This does not take policy action on the Ordinances or approve or disapprove any Ordinances on the agenda.

5. TRAVEL EXPENSES
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council move to approve the Council Travel Training and Meeting/Mileage Expenses Report through June 30, 2022.

6. TREASURER’S REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDED MAY 31, 2022
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Investment Report for the month ended May 31, 2022.

7. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF THE RESTATED CITY OF CALIMESA CAFETERIA PLAN.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-31, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Calimesa, California approving the adoption of the restated City of Calimesa Cafeteria Plan.

8. FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.

TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE

CITY’S HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM (HOME) GRANT FUNDED HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Fourth Amendment to the Agreement with Michael Baker International, Inc. to provide professional consultant services for the administration of the Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME) and Grant Funded Housing Rehabilitation Program.
9 APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND TKE

ENGINEERING, INC FOR DESIGN SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES RELATED TO THE COUNTY LINE ROAD CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an amendment to TKE’s Proposal for Design Services to include Construction Management Services associated with the LPP Portion of County Line Road Corridor Improvements.

10. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-32, A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Calimesa Acting As The Legislative Body Of Public Services Community Facilities District No. 1 (Law Enforcement, Fire, Paramedic And Park Maintenance Services) Authorizing The Annual Levy Of Special Taxes For Fiscal Year 2022/2023.

11. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2012-1(SINGLETON HEIGHTS) ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Adopt Resolution No. 2022-33 A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Calimesa Acting As The Legislative Body Of The Community Facilities District No. 2012-1 (Singleton Heights), Authorizing The Annual Levy Of Special Taxes For Fiscal Year 2022/2023.

12. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2013-1(JP RANCH) ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Adopt Resolution No. 2022-34, A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Calimesa Acting As The Legislative Body Of The Community Facilities District No. 2013-1 (JP Ranch), Authorizing The Annual Levy Of Special Taxes For Fiscal Year 2022/2023.

13. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2018-1 (SUMMERWIND TRAILS) ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Adopt Resolution No. 2022-35, A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Calimesa Acting As The Legislative Body Of The Community Facilities District No. 2018-1 (Summerwind Trails), Authorizing The Annual Levy Of Special Taxes For Fiscal Year 2022/2023.

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPORTS

POLICE CHIEF COMMENTS & REPORTS

FIRE CHIEF COMMENTS & REPORTS

MAYOR & COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTING OF COUNTY & REGIONAL MEETINGS This is the time for comments, announcements and/or reports on meetings attended at public expense as required by AB 1234.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
The order of business for the Public Hearing shall be:

A. Open Public Hearing
B. Staff Presentation
C. Applicant/Representative Presentation
D. Public Testimony
E. Applicant Rebuttal (if necessary)
F. Public Testimony Closed
G. Close Public Hearing
H. Council Discussion
I. Council Motion and Vote
Speakers are encouraged to be brief and remain within the established time limit of three (3) minutes per speaker. Once the public hearing has been closed, no further testimony will be taken.

14. PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council open the public hearing and continue to the September 6, 2022 City Council meeting to allow staff additional time to provide for the appropriate noticing to the property owners of payments due to the City for weed abatement charges.

15. PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS OF DELINQUENT REFUSE FEES RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Open the Public Hearing and take public testimony of the proposed special assessments of delinquent refuse fees; and

2. Adopt Resolution 2022-36, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Calimesa, California, confirming the report of charges to be placed as special assessments for delinquent refuse fees.

16. PUBLIC HEARING: APPROVAL OF THE FINAL ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT

FOR THE CITY OF CALIMESA CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 91-1
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Open the public hearing and take public testimony and

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-37, Resolution of the City Council of the City of Calimesa to Approve the Final Engineer’s Report for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 91-1 for fiscal Year 2022/2023.

BUSINESS ITEMS

17. APPROVE A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH SOUTH MESA WATER COMPANY FOR IMPROVEMENTS ALONG COUNTY LINE ROAD.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Approve a Memorandum of Agreement with South Mesa Water Company for Improvements along County Line Road.

2. Authorize City Manager to make non-substantive changes to the Memorandum of Agreement prior to execution of Agreement including adding appropriate Exhibits 1 through 6.

COUNCIL MEMBERS’ COMMENTS & REPORTS
This is the time for additional general comments, announcements, reports on meetings attended at public expense as required by AB 1234, requests of staff, and other issues of concern to Council Members may be presented briefly at this time. The Council may not legally take action on any item presented at this time other than to direct staff to investigate a complaint or place an item on a future agenda unless (1) by a majority vote, the Council determines that an emergency situation exists, as defined by Government Code § 54956.5 or (2) by a four-fifths vote, the Council determines that there is a need for immediate action and the need for action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted as required by Government Code § 54954.2(b).

CITY MANAGER COMMENTS & REPORTS

CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Government Code Section 54956.8: Property: 625 W. County Line Road, Calimesa 92320 Agency negotiators: City Manager Bonnie Johnson and City Attorney Quinn Barrow Negotiating parties: Troyce Lee Gayle , Jr., Administrator of Estate of Troyce Lee Gayle and Edward B. Fischel, LL.M, attorney for Administrator Under negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
Title: City Manager

ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of the City Council on Monday, August 1, 2022 at 6:00 p.m.

City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 1
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2022
PREPARED BY: Darlene Gerdes, Deputy City Manager/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the action minutes as presented for the Regular Joint City Council & Successor Agency to the Calimesa Redevelopment Agency Meeting of June 20, 2022 and the Special City Council Meeting of June 29, 2022.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A: Joint City Council & Successor Agency to the Calimesa Redevelopment Agency action minutes of June 20, 2022 Regular Meeting.

Attachment B: City Council action minutes of June 29, 2022 special meeting.

City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 2
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2022
PREPARED BY: Darlene Gerdes, Deputy City Manager/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the action minutes as presented for the June 13, 2022 Planning Commission meeting.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A: Planning Commission action minutes of June 13, 2022 Regular meeting.

City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 3
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANT REGISTER
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2022
PREPARED BY: Celeste Reid, Finance Director
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Warrant Register as presented.

SUMMARY: The attached Check Register Report for City Council’s approval is as follows:
a) Check Register Report with a total of $1,515,382.63 (Check Nos. 38815-38939) b) June 23, 2022 Payroll of $82,245.22
July 1, 2022 Council Payroll of $1,673.25
July 7, 2022 Payroll of $76,874.20

City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4
SUBJECT: WAIVE FULL READING OF ANY PROPOSED ORDINANCES ON

THE AGENDA
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2022
PREPARED BY: Darlene Gerdes, Deputy City Manager/City Clerk This permits reading the title only in lieu of reciting the entire text of the ordinances. This does not take
policy action on the Ordinances or approve or
disapprove any Ordinances on the agenda.

City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 5
SUBJECT: COUNCIL TRAVEL, TRAINING AND MEETING/MILEAGE

EXPENSES
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2022
PREPARED BY: Darlene Gerdes, Deputy City Manager/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Council Travel, Training and Meeting/Mileage Expenses Report through June 30, 2022.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A: Council Travel, Training and Meeting/Mileage Expenses Report through June 30, 2022.

FISCAL YEAR 2021-22

COUNCIL TRAVEL AND MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
ATTACHMENT 5A
MEETING/MILEAGE 01-1100-7590

DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
TOTAL TRAVEL/TRAINING $ - TOTAL MEETING/MILEAGE $ -
REMAINING BALANCE $ 1,450.00 REMAINING BALANCE $ 600.00 MEETING/MILEAGE 01-1100-7590

DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
17-Jun Registration for LOCC Conference $ 625.00 24-Aug Beaumont State of City $ 45.00 22-Sep Hotel for LOCC Conference $ 526.50 14-Oct Banning State of the City $ 51.25 23-Sep CalCities Riverside Division Meeting $ 60.00
TOTAL TRAVEL/TRAINING $ 1,211.50 TOTAL MEETING/MILEAGE $ 96.25 REMAINING BALANCE $ 238.50 REMAINING BALANCE $ 503.75

JEFF CERVANTEZ TRAVEL - MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
TRAVEL/TRAINING 01-1100-7585

WENDY HEWITT TRAVEL - MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
TRAVEL/TRAINING 01-1100-7585

FISCAL YEAR 2021-22

COUNCIL TRAVEL AND MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
ATTACHMENT 5A
MEETING/MILEAGE 01-1100-7590

DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
TOTAL TRAVEL/TRAINING $ - TOTAL MEETING/MILEAGE $ -
REMAINING BALANCE $ 1,900.00 REMAINING BALANCE $ 600.00 MEETING/MILEAGE 01-1100-7590

DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
17-Jun Registration LOCC Annual Conference $ 625.00
22-Sep Hotel for LOCC Annual Conference $ 526.50
23-Sep CalCities Riverside Division Meeting $ 60.00
TOTAL TRAVEL/TRAINING $ 1,211.50 TOTAL MEETING/MILEAGE $ - REMAINING BALANCE $ 238.50 REMAINING BALANCE $ 600.00

LINDA MOLINA TRAVEL - MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
TRAVEL/TRAINING 01-1100-7585

BILL DAVIS TRAVEL - MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
TRAVEL/TRAINING 01-1100-7585

FISCAL YEAR 2021-22

COUNCIL TRAVEL AND MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
ATTACHMENT 5A
MEETING/MILEAGE 01-1100-7590

DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
25-Aug Cancel Fee LOCC Conference $ 75.00 24-Aug Beaumont State of City $ 45.00 20-Jan New Mayors/Council Academy $ 250.00 14-Oct Banning State of City $ 51.25 5-May SCAG General Assembly Hotel $ 205.21 27-Jan Beaumont Chamber Installation $ 55.00 TOTAL TRAVEL/TRAINING $ 530.21 TOTAL MEETING/MILEAGE $ 151.25 REMAINING BALANCE $ 919.79 REMAINING BALANCE $ 448.75

WYNONA DUVALL TRAVEL - MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
TRAVEL/TRAINING 01-1100-7585

City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 6
SUBJECT: TREASURER’S REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDED
MAY 31, 2022
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2022
PREPARED BY: Celeste Reid, Finance Director
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Investment Report for the month ended May 31, 2022.

BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Council Resolution No. 2021-51 approved on November 15, 2021, the monthly Treasurer’s Report is hereby submitted. The report complies with the aforementioned Council resolution, as well as Government Code Section 53646.

DISCUSSION: Significant transactions during the month include the following:
• Transfer from Successor Agency fund general checking account of $39,318.32 for Successor Agency debt service payment due June 1, 2022
FISCAL IMPACT: Revenue was recognized for $101 of dividend/interest earnings.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A: Treasurer’s Report for the month ended May 31, 2022.

City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 7
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF THE RESTATED

CITY OF CALIMESA CAFETERIA PLAN
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2022
PREPARED BY: Darlene Gerdes, Deputy City Manager/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-31, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Calimesa, California approving the adoption of the Restated City of Calimesa Cafeteria Plan.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code authorizes employers to offer employees benefits on a pre-tax basis. An employer’s benefit plan that offers benefits on a pre-tax basis is referred to as a “Section 125 Plan” or a “Cafeteria Plan” (due to the fact that the employee can select from among different benefit options, including some that are available on a pre-tax basis). The City of Calimesa has offered its employees a Cafeteria Plan which includes health benefits since 2004. Internal Revenue Code Section 125 requires that in order for an employer to offer pre-tax benefits, the employer must have an approved written Cafeteria Plan document that describes all benefits and establishes rules for eligibility and elections. The City must now update its Cafeteria Plan document, which requires Council approval in order to meet current legal standards.

Employees participating in a Cafeteria Plan must be permitted to choose among at least one taxable benefit and one qualified benefit. Examples of qualified benefits include accident and health benefits; dependent care assistance; and group term life insurance coverage.

Examples of taxable benefits include some of the AFLAC Supplemental Plans. The City has offered a Cafeteria Plan consisting of various health care and medical benefits for many years.

Recently the City implemented an increase in the benefit allotment to its employees, which requires an update to the City’s Cafeteria Plan.

FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of the proposed resolution will not have an impact on the adopted budget but will ensure the City’s continued compliance with Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A: Resolution No. 2022-31
Attachment B: City of Calimesa Cafeteria Plan

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-31

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF THE RESTATED CITY OF

CALIMESA EMPLOYEE CAFETERIA PLAN AND RESCINDING
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-46 IN ITS ENTIRETY
WHEREAS a Cafeteria Plan is a mechanism through which an employer can offer its employees certain pre-tax benefits; and
WHEREAS an employer’s benefit plan that offers benefits on a pre-tax basis is referred to as a “Section 125 Plan” or “Cafeteria Plan”; and WHEREAS Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code requires an employer who offers pre-tax benefits to have an approved written Cafeteria Plan document that describes all benefits and establishes rules for eligibility and elections; and WHEREAS the City of Calimesa has offered its employees a Cafeteria Plan for employee benefits since 2004; and
WHEREAS the City restated the City of Calimesa Cafeteria Plan effective November 1, 2021 reflecting plan design changes and compliance with legal requirements; and WHEREAS the City desires to restate the City of Calimesa Cafeteria Plan effective as of August 1, 2022 in order to reflect plan design changes and to comply with current legal requirements; and
WHEREAS the Council desires to authorize the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee, to execute the proposed plan documents on behalf of the City, along with any future amendments that contain only non-substantive and/or administrative changes to the plan documents.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Council hereby adopts the amended and restated City of Calimesa Cafeteria Plan as a result of the City Council adoption of Resolution No. 2022-27 implementing a $100 per employee, per month increase in the City’s contribution to the Cafeteria (Employee Benefit) Plan effective with the first full pay period in July 2022 and attached hereto as “Exhibit A.”
Section 2. The Council hereby authorizes the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee to execute the proposed plan documents on behalf of the City, along with any future amendments that contain only non-substantive and/or administrative changes to the plan documents.

Attachment 7A

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of July 2022. ________________________________

WILLIAM DAVIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_____________________________________

DARLENE GERDES, CITY CLERK

City of Calimesa

CAFETERIA PLAN
City of Calimesa (employer) hereby adopts the City of Calimesa Cafeteria Plan (Plan) on the date set forth on the signature page hereof, for the exclusive benefit of its eligible employees and their families.

RECITALS
WHEREAS:

The Employer has provided various employee welfare benefits to its eligible employees pursuant to the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code) The Employer previously adopted a cafeteria plan under Code Section 125 in order to allow its eligible employees to pay for their share of the costs for such benefits on a pretax basis.

The Employer has determined that it is appropriate to amend and restate the Plan.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
Now, therefore, the Employer hereby amends and restates the Plan upon the following terms and conditions:

PLAN NAME
The name of this Plan is the “City of Calimesa Cafeteria Plan”.

PLAN DATE
This Plan is hereby amended and restated as a result of the City Council adoption of Resolution No. 2022-27 implementing a $100 per employee, per month increase in the City’s contribution to the Cafeteria (Employee Benefit) Plan effective with the first full pay period in July 2022.

EXCLUSIVE BENEFIT
It is the intention of the Employer that the Plan is created and maintained for the exclusive benefit of the Employer’s eligible Employees and their Beneficiaries.

Attachment 7B

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE 1. ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE
ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS
ARTICLE 3. PARTICIPATION
ARTICLE 4. PAY CONVERSION AND BENEFIT ELECTIONS
ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE PREMIUMS
ARTICLE 6. HEALTH CARE REIMBURSEMENT PLAN
ARTICLE 7. DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE PLAN
ARTICLE 8. FORFEITURES AND LIMITATIONS
ARTICLE 9. CLAIMS REVIEW PROCEDURES
ARTICLE 10. ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCES
ARTICLE 11. AMENDMENTS AND TERMINATION
ARTICLE 12. MISCELLANEOUS

ARTICLE 1. ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE

1.1 Establishment. CITY OF CALIMESA establishes a cafeteria plan for the benefit of its employees who may participate in the Plan. The Plan shall be known as the CITY OF CALIMESA CAFETERIA PLAN.

1.2 Purpose. The purpose of the Plan is to provide Employees who may participate in the Plan the choice among different combinations of health, dependent care, and other benefits as specified in the Plan. The Plan is established in accordance with the provisions of Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code and other applicable provisions.

1.3 Qualified Status. The Plan is intended to meet the requirements of Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code and shall be interpreted and administered in accordance with the requirements of that section.

1.4 History. The following provisions constitute an amendment, restatement, and continuation of the CITY OF CALIMESA CAFETERIA PLAN, (established August 1, 2007 and amended and restated November 1, 2021).

ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS

2.1 Definitions. Whenever used in the Plan, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings set forth below unless the context plainly requires a different meaning. (a) Affiliate means any entity (other than the Employer) that is part of a group of entities that includes the Employer and that constitutes: (i) a controlled group of corporations (as defined in section 4 l 4(b) of the Code); (ii) a group of trades or businesses, whether or not incorporated, under common control (as defined in section 414(c) of the Code); or (iii) an affiliated service group (within the meaning of section 414(m) of the Code), and that adopts the Plan with the Employer's consent.
(b) Change in Status, means a Change in Status, as defined in Section

4.2(b)(2) of this Plan.
(c) COBRA means the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986, as amended.
(d) Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. (e) Committee means the Benefit Plan Committee of the Employer, or such other person or Committee as may be appointed by the Employer to supervise the administration of the Plan in accordance with the provisions of Article 10.

(f) Compensation of a Participant means the total of amounts paid to a Participant by the Employer and reported on the Participant's Federal Income Tax Withholding Statement (form W-2) but excluding all fringe benefits.
(g) Contract Administrator means an administrator that has contracted with the Employer to provide administrative services under the Plan. This term is not the same and is not intended to have the same meaning as the term defined in section 3(16) of ERISA.
(h) Dependent means one of the following individuals:
(1) An individual who qualifies as a dependent under the provisions of Section 152 of the Code
(2) For purposes of the Health Care Expense Account, the term "Dependent" includes a child who is otherwise a Dependent under this section and who is entitled to coverage under a qualified medical child support order or otherwise in accordance with the provisions of section 609 of ERISA.
(i) Dependent Care Assistance Account means the account established under Section 7.1 for each Participant, as increased under Section 7.2 by allocated Pay Conversion Contributions and as decreased under Section

7.3 by benefit payments made to the Participant.
(j) Effective Date means 08/01/2022, the date on which the Plan becomes effective.
(k) Eligible Employee means an Employee who works at least 30 hours per week for the Employer continuously for a period of 0 day(s), counting periods that an Employee is on leave required under FMLA or during an absence from work for duty in the uniformed services of the United States of America.
(l) Employee means an Employee of the Employer who receives compensation from the Employer. Employee status shall not be affected by a leave of absence that is Employer-approved or legally required. However, the term Employee shall not include any person employed by the Employer at a location outside the United States or an individual characterized by the employer as an independent contractor.
(m) Employee Benefit Election Form means the form described in Section

3.2. (n) Employer means CITY OF CALIMESA or its successor(s). However, where appropriate, the term Employer shall also mean an Affiliate that is the employer of a particular Participant.

(o) Employment-Related Dependent Care Expense means an amount paid by a Participant for household services or for the care of a Qualifying Individual, to the extent that such expense is incurred to enable the Participant to be gainfully employed for any period for which there are one or more Qualifying Individuals with respect to the Participant. However, (1) if such amounts are paid for expenses incurred outside the Participant's household, they shall constitute Employment-Related Dependent Care Expenses only if incurred for a Qualifying Individual who is a Dependent under the age of 13 for whom the Participant is entitled to an exemption under Section 151 of the Code or for a Qualifying Individual who regularly spends at least eight hours per day in the Participant's household; (2) if the expense is incurred outside the Participant's home at a facility that provides care for more than six individuals who do not regularly reside at the facility, the facility must comply with all applicable licensing requirements, if any; and (3) Employment-Related Dependent Care Expenses of a Participant shall not include expenses paid or incurred for services provided by (i) a child of such Participant who is under the age of 19 or (ii) an individual who is a Dependent of such Participant or such Participant's spouse. (p) FMLA Leave means a leave of absence provided to an Employee of the Employer under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, as amended. (q) Health Care Expense means an expense related to the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease consisting of expenses for medical care within the meaning of Section 213 of the Code, including, but not limited to, payments for the purpose of affecting any structure or function of the body, or for any hospital or nursing charges, optometrically, ophthalmological or auditory care, routine physical examinations, well-baby care, dental and orthodontic care, psychiatric care, prescription drugs, insulin, eyeglasses or contact lenses, hearing-aid appliances, similar prosthetic devices, medical-related transportation or medical or dental insurance out-of-pocket expenses.

The term "Health Care Expense" does not include cosmetic surgery or other similar procedures, unless the surgery or procedure is necessary to ameliorate a deformity arising from, or directly related to, a congenital abnormality, a personal injury resulting from an accident or trauma, or disfiguring disease. The term cosmetic surgery means any procedure, which is directed at improving the patient's appearance and does not meaningfully promote the proper function of the body or prevent or treat illness or disease.

The term "Health Care Expense" shall generally include medicine and drugs that do not require the prescription of a physician for their use by an individual, including but not limited to antacids, allergy medicine, pain relievers and cold medicines. The term "Health Care Expense" shall not, however, include illegally procured medicine and drugs, toiletries,

cosmetics or sundry items, or any other item generally considered to be a medicine or drug that does not treat a medical condition. (r) Health Care Expense Account means the account established under Section 6.1 for each Participant, as increased under Section 6.2 by allocated Pay Conversion Contributions and as decreased under Section

6.3 by benefit payments made to the Participant.
(s) Highly Compensated Employee means a highly compensated individual or participant as defined in Code Section 125(e); a highly compensated employee as defined in Code Section 129(d)(2); or a highly compensated individual as defined in Code Section 105(h)(5).
(t) Insurance Plan means the plan(s) maintained by the employer to provide accident and health benefits to Employer's Employees, which is partially or fully insured by an independent third party.
(u) Key Employee means a key employee as defined in Code Section 416(i)(l). (v) Participant means a person who is an Eligible Employee on or after the Effective Date, who applies to participate in the Plan, and who satisfies the participation conditions of Article 3.
(w) Pay Conversion Contributions means the contributions of a Participant made by salary reduction agreement in accordance with Section 4.1. (x) Period of Coverage, with respect to any Plan Year, means that Plan Year. However, for any Employee:
(1) Who becomes a Participant after the start of a Plan Year, the Period of Coverage means the period commencing on the effective date of the Participant's participation and extending through the remainder of the Plan Year, or
(2) Who ceases being a Participant after the start of a Plan Year, the Period of Coverage means the period commencing on the first day of the Plan Year and extending through the last day of the Participant's participation.
(y) Plan means the CITY OF CALIMESA CAFETERIA PLAN as amended or restated from time to time.
(z) Plan Year means each twelve-month period ending July 31. (aa) Premium Only Option means the option to pay insurance plan premiums on a pre-tax basis through the Plan.

(bb) Qualifying Individual means:
(i) a Dependent of a Participant who is under the age of 13, with respect to whom the Participant is entitled to an exemption under Section 151 of the Code, and
(ii) a Dependent or spouse of a Participant who is physically or mentally incapable of caring for himself.

2.2 Gender and Number. Except as otherwise indicated by context, masculine terminology also includes the feminine, and vice versa, and terms used in the singular may also include the plural.

ARTICLE 3. PARTICIPATION

3.1 Participation Conditions. As a condition of participation and receipt of benefits under this Plan, each Participant shall be required to:
(a) Furnish to the Committee a completed Employee Benefit Election Form along with required documentation
(b) Designate and apply a portion of his or her Compensation as Pay Conversion Contributions in accordance with the provisions of Article 4 (c) Observe all Plan requirements, rules, and regulations (d) Consent to inquiries by the Committee with respect to any physician, hospital or other provider of health care or other services involved in a claim under this Plan
(e) Submit to the Committee all reports, bills, and other information that the Employer may reasonably require

3.2 Application to Participate. As a condition of participation, each Eligible Employee shall complete, sign, and deliver to the Committee an Employee Benefit Election Form before his or her first day of participation. It is by this form that the Eligible Employee applies to participate in the Plan, designates the required portion of his or her Compensation for that Plan Year as Pay Conversion Contributions, makes a benefit election, and supplies any other pertinent information that the Committee reasonably requires. Unless otherwise required by the Committee, the application shall be delivered to the Committee prior to the first day of an Employee's participation.

3.3 Commencement of Participation. After an Eligible Employee satisfies the participation requirements of this Article 3, the Eligible Employee may become a Participant the latter of:
(a) 30 days following date of employment.

(b) Immediately following the date on which the Committee receives the Participant's signed Employee Benefit Election Form.

3.4 Cessation of Participation. Participation in the Plan will end at the time that an individual ceases to be a Participant as defined in Section 2.l(v). With respect to periods following the date participation otherwise ends, Pay Conversion Contributions will cease but coverage may continue for the remainder of the period of coverage with respect to which the required premium has been paid.

ARTICLE 4. PAY CONVERSION AND BENEFIT ELECTIONS

4.1 Pay Conversion. Each Participant shall designate a portion of his or her Compensation for each Plan year to be applied as Pay Conversion Contributions. The portion shall be specified by the Participant at the time that a benefit election is made under Section 4.2 on the Employee Benefit Election Form. However, the maximum is as follows:
(a) The maximum annual contribution per Participant to pay for insurance premiums under Article 5 shall be the actual cost of such premium payments.
(b) The maximum annual contribution per Participant to this Health Care Expense Account under 6.1 shall be $2,850.00. You have the option to roll over up to $570 of unused FSA funds remaining at the end of the plan year. (c) The maximum annual contribution per Participant to his or her Dependent Care Assistance Account under Section 7.1 shall be the lesser of: (i) $5,000.00 (with respect to a calendar year), or, instead, $2,500.00 (with respect to a calendar year) if a Participant is married and files a separate Federal income tax return for that year; (ii) the Participant's earned income or (iii) the spouse's earned income, if applicable.

The Employer may, if necessary, adjust the rate to account for benefit election adjustments prescribed by Article 5. Except as otherwise provided by the Employer, Pay Conversion Contributions shall reduce the Participant's Compensation ratably on each pay day beginning on or after the first day of the Participant's participation, and shall continue in effect until changed in accordance with Section 4.2.

4.2 Benefit Elections.
(a) Each Participant shall make a benefit election, in the manner provided in the Plan, to apply his or her Pay Conversion Contributions during each Plan Year, in such proportions as he or she chooses, to the following:
(1) To pay the Participant's premiums for Employer-sponsored health care insurance and other insured Employer-sponsored plans, as set forth in Article 5

(2) To pay the Participant's premiums for Employer-sponsored group term life insurance as set forth in Article 5
(3) To apply to the Participant's Health Care Expense Account for that Plan Year in accordance with Article 6
(4) To apply to the Participant's Dependent Care Assistance Account for that Plan Year in accordance with Article 7 a Participant's initial benefit election shall be made as part of his or her application to participate under Section 3.2 and the election shall remain in effect until changed in accordance with this Section. A Participant may change her benefit election for a subsequent Plan Year by providing written notice to the Employer on a new Employee Benefit Election Form prior to the first day of the Plan Year for which such change is to be effective in accordance with rules prescribed by the Committee. (b) A Participant's benefit election for any Plan Year shall be irrevocable during the Plan Year, except that:
(1) The Employer may limit a Participant's contributions in accordance with Section 8.2
(2) Change in Status
(A) If the Participant has a Change in Status (as defined in Subsection (B) below), he shall be entitled to revoke or modify his benefit election in a manner that is consistent with such Change in Status (as defined in Subsection (C) below), by providing written notice to the Committee within 31 days of the status change. An authorized change in the Participant's benefit election due to a Change in Status shall be effective the latter of:
(i) Eligibility following the date the Change in Status occurs
(ii) Immediately following the date on which the Committee receives the Participant's written notice
(B) A Change in Status is an event that falls into one of the following categories:
(i) Legal Marital Status changes: including marriage,
death of spouse, divorce, legal separation and
annulment.
(ii) Changes in Number of Dependents: including birth,
death, adoption and placement for adoption.

(iii) Employment Status changes of the Participant or the Participant's spouse or dependents: termination or
commencement of employment, strike or lockout,
commencement or return from unpaid leave of
absence, change of worksite or change in employment
status.
(iv) Dependent Satisfies or Ceases to Satisfy the
Requirements for Unmarried Dependents: change in
student status or dependent no longer qualifies
because of age.
(v) Change in Residence: change in place of residence of the employee, spouse or dependent.
(C) For accident or health coverage and group term life, the election change is consistent with the Change in Status only if the election change is on account of and corresponds with a change in status that affects eligibility for coverage under an employer's plan.

For other qualified benefits, the election change is consistent with the Change in Status only if it meets one of the following conditions:
(i) The election change is on account of and corresponds with a change in status that affects eligibility for
coverage under an employer's plan.
(ii) The election change is on account of and corresponds with a change in status that affects expenses described in IRC Section 129 with respect to the Dependent Care
FSA.

The consistency rule of this Subsection shall be
interpreted in accordance with the Special Consistency
rules of applicable law.
(3) Special Events
(A) Participant may revoke or modify his benefit election during the current Plan Year if the revocation or modification is on account of a Qualified Medical Child Support Order (QMCSO) or other Judgements or Orders under 29 USC Section
1169(a); on account of the special enrollment rights of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA); on account of an employee, spouse or dependent becomes entitled to coverage under Part A or Part B of
Medicare or Medicaid or on account of a COBRA Qualifying Event.

(B) A Participant, on account of an unpaid FMLA Leave, may revoke his benefit elections. When he returns from unpaid FMLA Leave after having revoked his benefit elections on account of taking FMLA Leave he may have his benefit elections reinstated on the same terms as prior to taking FMLA Leave, to the extent that reinstatement is required under the FMLA. A reinstated Participant shall not have a greater right to benefits for the remainder of the Plan Year than a Participant who is continuously working during the Plan Year. (4) Cost/Coverage Changes
(A) Cost Changes
(i) The Employer may modify a Participant's contribution in accordance with the automatic adjustment in Section 5.2. (ii) If the cost of coverage of an Employer-sponsored Plan described in Section 5.1 significantly increases or significantly decreases, a Participant who is covered under that Employersponsored Plan may choose to pay the increased or decreased premium or revoke coverage under the plan for which the premiums are being increased and elect coverage under a plan providing similar coverage, if available.

If the cost of coverage of an Employer-sponsored Plan
described in Section 5.1 significantly decreases, an Eligible Employee who is not a Participant may choose to commence participation in the plan with the decrease in cost.
(iii) With respect to a Dependent Care Assistance Plan under Article 7, a Participant may modify a benefit election if the cost for service provided by a dependent care provider, who is not a relative of the Participant, increases or decreases.
(iv) Cost changes covered by this Section 4.2 (b)(4)(A) include but are not limited to, cost changes initiated by the Eligible Employee or the Employer.
(B) Coverage Changes
(i) If coverage provided under a plan described in Section 5.1 or Article 7 is significantly curtailed that is not a loss of coverage, a Participant who is covered under that plan shall be entitled to change his benefit election by revoking coverage under the plan being curtailed but must elect coverage under a plan providing similar coverage, if available.

(ii) If coverage provided under a plan described in Section 5.1 or Article 7 is significantly curtailed that is a loss of coverage, a Participant who is covered under that plan shall be entitled to change his benefit election by revoking coverage under the plan being curtailed and elect coverage under a plan providing similar coverage, if available. (iii) If during a period of coverage, a new benefit plan is added or an existing benefit option is significantly improved, an Eligible Employee may elect the new benefit plan or improved benefit plan and make a corresponding election change with respect to other plans providing similar coverage.
(iv) A Participant may make a change in such Participant's benefit election if such change is on account of and corresponds with a change made under another employer plan if (a) such change is permitted under the other employer's cafeteria plan (or qualified benefit plan) and Code requirements applicable to such change; or (b) this Plan permits participants to make an election for a period of coverage which is different from the period of coverage under the other cafeteria plan (or qualified benefit plan).
(C) This Section 4.2(b)(4) does not apply to an election change with respect to the Health Care Reimbursement Plan described in Article

6. (5) A Participant who separates from the service of the Employer during a period of coverage may revoke existing benefit elections and terminate the receipt of benefits for the remaining portion of the period of coverage. If the Employee should return to service within 30 days for the Employer during the same plan year, the Employee shall reenroll with the same benefit elections prior to termination for the remaining portion of the period of coverage. If the Employee should return to service of the Employer after 30 days, but during the same plan year, the Employee may re-enroll for the remaining portion of the period of coverage.
(6) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4.2 (b)(2) and 4.2 (b)(4) no change shall be permitted unless both the old and the new benefit plans permit such change.

4.3 Contribution during Leave. With respect to Participants who go on a leave of absence which is Employer-approved or unpaid FMLA Leave, contributions required or permitted to be made by them under the Plan may be made by one of the following methods, which must be nondiscriminatory, as agreed between the Employee on leave and the Committee before the commencement of the leave of absence or the applicable coverage period:
(a) Contributions may be made by the Employee on leave on a regular basis (generally on an after- tax basis)

(b) Contributions may be made by the Employee on leave by prepayment (generally on a pre-tax basis with respect to the same Plan Year during which the leave occurs)
(c) Contributions advanced by the Employer on behalf of an Employee on leave may be re-paid by the Participant when he or she returns from leave on either a pre-tax with respect to the same Plan Year during which the leave occurs or on an after-tax basis.

ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE PREMIUMS

5.1 Coverages. To the extent a Participant so elects, a portion of the Participant's Pay Conversion Contributions shall be used to pay the Participant's share of the cost of coverage (single or family coverage, whichever applies) under the Employersponsored Plans listed in Schedule A and Schedule B and incorporated by reference herein. The benefit description in each of those plans is incorporated by reference into this Plan. The terms and conditions of each of those plans shall govern the provision of benefits under each plan.

5.2 Automatic Adjustments. If during the Plan Year the cost of Employer-sponsored Plans described in Section 5.1 which is selected by a Participant changes and the change is not significant, the Participant's benefit election shall, with respect to premium payments for that health plan, automatically be adjusted to reflect such change. A Participant shall not be permitted to change coverage during a Plan Year because of change in the cost of coverage, except as otherwise provided in Article 4.

ARTICLE 6. HEALTH CARE REIMBURSEMENT PLAN

6.1 Health Care Expense Accounts. The Committee shall establish for each Participant who elects the benefit option under this Article 6 a Health Care Expense Account for each Plan Year. Each Health Care Spending Account shall contain zero dollars ($0.00) initially, however at the commencement of each Plan Year $550.00 may be rolled over to the next plan year if necessary.

6.2 Increases in Health Care Expense Account. A Participant's Health Care Expense Account for a Plan Year shall be increased by the portion of the Participant's Pay Conversion Contributions for that Plan Year that he has elected to apply toward his Health Care Expense Account in accordance with Section 4.2.

6.3 Decreases in Health Care Expense Account. The balance in a Participant's Health Care Expense Account for a Plan Year shall be reduced by the amount of any benefits paid to a Participant under Section 6.4.

6.4 Health Care Benefits. Subject to limitations contained in other provisions of this Plan, a Participant who elects the benefit option under this Article 6 and who incurs Health Care Expenses attributable to himself, his spouse or his dependents during his Period of Coverage for a Plan Year shall be entitled to receive from the Plan

full reimbursement for the entire amount of such expenses to the extent of the amount of the Participant's benefit election for the Health Care Expense Account for that Plan Year.

6.5 Reimbursement Procedures. In order to receive reimbursement for health care expenses under this Article 6:
(a) The Participant must complete a Claim Form, attach (i) an itemized billing statement from the health care provider, (ii) an explanation of benefits from the Participant's insurer or (iii) other satisfactory proof of claim, and forward the documents to the Administrator. The Participant must provide additional information reasonably requested by the Administrator.

Claims for medicine and drugs that do not require a physician's prescription may be substantiated through itemized receipts indicating the medicine or drugs purchased. Additional documentation from a medical professional may be required to demonstrate that the medicine or drug treats an existing medical condition.
(b) A request for reimbursement must relate to Health Care Expenses incurred during the Participant's period of coverage. For this purpose, the term "incurred" refers to when the health care services were provided. In no event may claims incurred in one plan year be submitted during the following Plan Year, nor shall any unpaid claims be the liability of the Plan, the Employer, or the Administrator.
(c) A request for reimbursement for Health Care Expenses incurred during a Plan Year must be received by the Administrator either during the Period of Coverage or on or before 90 days following the Period of Coverage. (d) Reimbursement, if made, shall be made by the Administrator directly to the Participant, upon which the Employer, the Plan, and the Administrator shall be relieved of all further responsibility with respect to the expenses reimbursed.

Upon presentation .of a claim, a Participant shall expressly represent that the item for which a claim is made is not subject to reimbursement under any policy described in Article 5 or from any other source and such item will not be used as a deduction under Section 213 of the Code. (e) The Employer may establish a minimum reimbursement amount.

6.6 Limitations on Health Care Benefits. Despite the provisions of this Article 6, no benefits shall be paid under this Article:
(a) If and to the extent that such reimbursement or payment is covered under any insurance policy or policies, whether paid for by the Employer or the Participant, or under any other health and accident plan by whomever

maintained. In the event that there is such a policy or plan in effect providing for such reimbursement or payment, in whole or in part, then to the extent of the coverage under such policy or plan, the Employer and the Plan shall be relieved of any liability.
(b) To the extent that an expense has been submitted for reimbursement from a Participant's Dependent Care Assistance account.
(c) For any expenses incurred for medical insurance premiums.

6.7 Continuation of Health Care Coverage. To the extent required by COBRA, a qualified beneficiary (as defined in section 607 of ERISA) who would lose Health Care coverage under the Plan upon the occurrence of a qualifying event (as described in section 603 of ERISA) shall be permitted to continue Health Care coverage under the Plan by electing to pay the applicable premiums, on an aftertax basis, in accordance with procedures established by the Committee that are consistent with Part 6 of Title I of ERISA and any regulations under that Part. The Employer shall provide notice to each covered Employee and spouse of their rights under COBRA in accordance with applicable law and the regulations thereunder.

The City of Calimesa contracts with TASC to administer the COBRA program adhering to the required procedures for COBRA benefits.

6.8 Additional Requirements for Group Health Plans. The Health Care Reimbursement Plan shall be interpreted and administered so as to provide coverage, under written procedures established by the Administrator, with respect to individuals for which coverage is required by the applicable provisions of ERISA section 609 and any regulations under those provisions.

6.9 Separate Written Plan. For purposes of the Code, this Article shall constitute a separate written plan providing for the reimbursement of Health Care Expenses.

To the extent necessary, other provisions of the Plan are deemed incorporated by reference in this Article 6.

6.10 HIPPA Privacy Rule. To the extent and effective required by HIPAA, the Employer agrees that it shall:

1. use and disclose protected health information as described by HIPAA ("PHI") only for payment and health care operations under the HFSA Plan and not use or further disclose PHI other than as required by law;

2. ensure that any agents or subcontractors to which it provides PHI received from the Health Care Reimbursement Plan as described in this Article 6 (the "HFSA Plan") agree to same restrictions and conditions that apply to the Plan Sponsor;

3. not use or disclose PHI for employment-related actions or in connection with any other employee benefit plan;

4. report to the HFSA Plan any use or disclosure of information that is inconsistent with the permitted uses or disclosures described herein;

5. make PHI available to plan participants, consider their amendments and, upon request, provide them with an accounting of PHI disclosures;

6. make its internal practices and records relating to the use and disclosure of PHI received from the HFSA Plan available to the United States Department of Health and Human Services;

7. if commercially reasonable, return or destroy all PHI received from the HFSA Plan and maintained in any form, retaining no copies of such information when no longer needed for the purpose for which the disclosure was made, except that, if such return or destruction is not commercially reasonable, limit further uses and disclosures to the purposes that make the return or destruction infeasible;

8. permit only those employees of an Employer who are responsible for payment and health care operations under the HFSA Plan to receive PHI;

9. restrict access to and use of PHI by the employees described in 8 above to the HFSA Plan administrative functions that the Employer performs for the HFSA Plan, except as otherwise allowed by HIPAA;

10. resolve any issues of noncompliance with HIPAA through intervention by an appropriate officer of the Employer; and

11. ensure the adequate separation between the group health plan and the plan sponsor required in HIPAA as set forth in 45 CFR § 164.504(f)(2)(iii).

ARTICLE 7. DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE PLAN

7.1 Dependent Care Assistance Account. The Committee shall establish for each Participant who elects the benefit option under this Article 7, a Dependent Care Assistance Account for each Plan Year. Each Dependent Care Assistance Account shall contain zero dollars ($0.00) initially and at the commencement of each Plan Year.

7.2 Increases in Dependent Care Assistance Account. A Participant's Dependent Care Assistance Account for a Plan Year shall be increased each payroll period by the portion of the Participant's Pay Conversion Contributions for that Plan Year that he has elected to apply toward his Dependent Care Assistance Account in accordance with Section 4.2.

7.3 Decreases in Dependent Care Assistance Account. The balance in a Participant's Dependent Care Assistance Account for a Plan Year shall be reduced by the amount of any benefit paid to or on behalf of a Participant under Section

7.4.

7.4 Dependent Care Benefits. Subject to limitations contained in other provisions of this Plan, a Participant who elects the benefit option under this Article 7 and incurs Employment-Related Dependent Care Expenses during his Period of Coverage for a Plan Year shall be entitled to receive from the Plan full reimbursement for the entire amount of such expenses to the extent of the amount contained in the Participant's Dependent Care Assistance Account for that Plan Year. However, no reimbursement shall be paid pursuant to this Article to the extent that an expense has been submitted for reimbursement from a Participant's Health Care Expense Account.

7.5 Reimbursement Procedures. In order to receive reimbursement for dependent care expenses under this Article 7:
(a) The Participant must complete a Claim Form, attach a statement of service from the dependent care provider or other proof of claim, and forward the documents to the Administrator. The Participant must provide additional information reasonably requested by the Administrator.
(b) A request for reimbursement that exceeds the balance in the Participant's Dependent Care Assistance Account shall be processed only to the extent of the amount of the account balance. The excess shall be carried over to the following reimbursement period and processed at that time. However, after the Participant's Dependent Care Assistance Account has been exhausted, claims remaining unpaid at the end of the Plan Year shall be canceled. In no event may these claims be resubmitted during the following Plan Year, nor shall any unpaid claims be the liability of the Plan, the Employer, or the Administrator.
(c) A request for reimbursement must relate to Employment-Related Dependent Care Expenses incurred during the Participant's Period of Coverage. For this purpose, the term "incurred" refers to when the dependent care services were provided.
(d) A request for reimbursement for Dependent Care Expenses incurred during a Plan Year must be received by the Administrator either during the Period of Coverage or on or before 90 days following the Period of Coverage. (e) Reimbursement, if made, shall be made by the Administrator directly to the Participant, which shall cause the Employer, the Plan, and the Administrator to be relieved of all further responsibility with respect to the expense reimbursed.
(f) The Employer may establish a minimum reimbursement amount.

7.6 Separate Written Plan. For purposes of the Code, this Article shall constitute a separate written plan providing a program for the reimbursement of dependent care assistance expenses. To the extent necessary, other provisions of the Plan are deemed incorporated by reference in this Article 7.

ARTICLE 8. FORFEITURES AND LIMITATIONS

8.1 Account Forfeitures. Any amounts contributed to a Participant's Health Care Expense Account or Dependent Care Assistance Account which have not been used to pay claims for benefits incurred by the end of each period of coverage after the period for filing claims has expired shall be forfeited by a participant.

8.2 Limitation on Contributions and Benefits for Certain Participants. The Committee shall determine, before or during any Plan Year, whether the Plan fails to satisfy for the Plan Year any nondiscrimination requirement imposed by the Code, or any limitation on benefits provided to Employees who are considered Highly Compensated Employees, Key Employees and/or 5% owners under applicable Code provisions. The Committee shall take action that it deems appropriate, under rules uniformly applied to similarly situated Participants, to assure compliance with such requirements or limitations. Such action may include, without limitation, a modification of elections by Highly Compensated Employees, Key Employees and/or 5% owners with or without the consent of such Employees.

ARTICLE 9. CLAIMS REVIEW PROCEDURES

9.1 Determinations. The Employer (or the Employer's designee) shall notify a Participant in writing within 30 days of his written application for benefits of his eligibility or non-eligibility for benefits under the Plan unless special circumstances require an extension of time for perfecting the claim. Notice must be given to the claimant of the extension within 30 days of his submission of the claim. The notice must specify the reason for the extension of the date with which a decision is expected to be rendered.

9.2 Notice. If the Employer (or the Employer's designee) determines that a Participant is not eligible for all or part of the benefits, the notice shall set forth (a) the specific reasons for such denial, (b) a specific reference to the provision of the Plan on which the denial is based, (c) a description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect his claim and a description of why it is needed, and (d) an explanation of the Plan's claims review procedure and other appropriate information as to the steps to be taken in the event the participant wishes to submit the denied claim for review.

9.3 Review. If a Participant is determined to be ineligible for benefits, or if the Participant believes that he is entitled to greater or different benefits, he shall have the opportunity to have his denied claim reviewed by the Committee by filing a petition for review with the Committee within 180 days after he received the claim denial notice. The petition shall state the specific reasons, which the Participant believes, entitle him to benefits or to greater or different benefits. Within 60 days after the Committee receives the petition for review, the Committee shall afford the Participant (and his counsel, if any) an opportunity to present his position to the Committee orally or in writing, and the Participant (or his counsel) shall have the right to review the pertinent documents.

9.4 Decision. The Committee shall notify the Participant of its final decision in writing within the 60-day period after receiving the request for review stating specifically in writing the basis of the decision in a manner calculated to be understood by the Participant and the specific provisions of the Plan on which the decision is based.

If a Participant dies, the same procedure shall apply to his beneficiaries.

ARTICLE 10. ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCES

10.1 Administration. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee referred to in Section 2.l(e). The Committee shall consist of one or more members appointed by the Employer (the Members). The Members of the Committee shall be the named fiduciaries (as described in Section 402 of ERISA) and the plan administrator (as described in Section 3(16)(A) of ERISA) under the Plan.

10.2 Powers of Committee. The Committee shall act by a majority of its then Members, by meeting or by writing filed without meeting, and shall have the following powers, rights, and duties in addition to those vested in it elsewhere in the Plan:
(a) To adopt rules of procedure and regulations it determines may be necessary for the proper and efficient administration of the Plan, consistent with the provisions of the Plan.
(b) To enforce the Plan in accordance with its terms and with rules and regulations adopted by the Committee.
(c) To determine all questions arising under the Plan, including claims for benefits, interpret the Plan, and to remedy ambiguities, inconsistencies, or omissions.
(d) To maintain adequate records concerning the Plan and its administration. (e) To furnish the Employer with such information with respect to the Plan as they may require for tax or other purposes.

A written statement by a majority of Members or by an authorized Member that the Committee has taken or authorized any action shall be conclusive in favor of the person relying on the statement.

10.3 Delegation by the Committee. The Committee may employ agents and counsel (who may also be employed by or represent the Employer) and delegate to them such powers as the Committee deems desirable. Any such delegations shall be in writing and shall reflect the unanimous action of the Members then acting. The delegation shall describe the advice to be rendered or the functions and duties to be performed by the delegate.

10.4 Uniform Rules. The Committee shall uniformly apply rules and regulations adopted by it to all persons similarly situated.

10.5 Information to be furnished to Committee. The Employer shall furnish the Committee such information as may be required by the Committee. The records of the Employer as to an Employee's or Participant's period of employment,

termination of employment, and compensation will be conclusive on all persons unless determined by the Committee to be incorrect. Participants and other persons entitled to benefits under the Plan shall furnish to the Committee such evidence or information as it considers desirable to carry out the Plan.

10.6 Committee Decisions Final. To the extent permitted by law, any interpretation of the Plan and any decision on any matter within the discretion of the Committee made by it in good faith are binding on all persons. A misstatement or other mistake of fact shall be corrected when it becomes known, and the Committee shall make such adjustment on account thereof as it considers equitable and practicable.

10.7 Compensation and Expenses. No compensation shall be paid to any Member as such. However, the reasonable expenses of a Member incurred in the performance of a Committee function shall be reimbursed by the Employer in such proportions as the Employer decides.

10.8 Interested Committee Member. A Member may not decide any matter or question concerning his own benefits under the Plan unless such decision would be made by him under the Plan if not a Member.

10.9 Resignation or Removal of Committee Member. A Member may resign at any time by giving advance written notice to the Employer, and the other Members.

The Employer may remove a Member at any time by giving advance written notice to him and the other Committee Members.

10.10 Appointment of Successor Committee Member. The Employer shall fill any vacancy in the membership of the Committee within a reasonable period of time and shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Committee Members. While there is a vacancy in the membership of the Committee, the remaining Committee Members shall have the same powers as the full Committee until the vacancy is filled.

10.11 Indemnification of the Committee. To the extent permitted by law, the Committee and its individual Members shall be indemnified by the Employer, and held harmless by the Employer against, any and all liabilities, losses, costs, or expenses (including legal fees and expenses) of whatsoever kind and nature that may be imposed on, incurred by, or asserted against the Committee or its Members at any time by reason of the performance of a Committee function, but only if the Committee or its Members did not act dishonestly or in a willful violation of the law or regulation under which such liability, loss, cost, or expense arose.

10.12 Finances. The costs of the Plan shall be borne by CITY OF CALIMESA. For purposes of this Plan, Pay Conversion Contributions shall be deemed to be contributions by the Employer.

ARTICLE 11. AMENDMENTS AND TERMINATION

11.1 Amendments. The Employer may amend the Plan, in full or in part, at any time.

Any amendment shall be timely filed with the Plan documents and reasonable notification provided to Employees.

11.2 Benefits Provided Through Third Parties. In the case of any benefit provided pursuant to any insurance policy or other contract with a third party, the Employer may amend the Plan by changing insurers, policies, or contracts without changing the language of this Plan document, provided that copies of the contracts or policies are filed with the Plan documents and the Participants are reasonably informed (to the extent required by law) as to the effects of any such changes. If there is any perceived conflict or inconsistency at any given point in time among the description of benefits contained in the contract or policy and the other Plan documents, the terms of the contract or policy shall control.

11.3 Termination. The Employer intends the Plan to be permanent, but necessarily must, and does, reserve the right to terminate the Plan at any time. In the event of a Plan termination, Pay Conversion Contributions will cease. Thereafter neither the Employer nor any of its Employees shall have any further financial obligations under the Plan except such that have accrued up to the date of termination and have not been satisfied.

ARTICLE 12. MISCELLANEOUS

12.1 No Guaranty of Employment. The adoption and maintenance of the Plan shall not be deemed to be a contract of employment between the Employer and any Employee. Nothing contained in the Plan shall give any Employee the right to be retained in the employ of the Employer or to interfere with the right of the Employer to discharge any Employee at any time, nor shall it give the Employer the right to require any Employee to remain in its employ or to interfere with the Employee's right to terminate his employment at any time.

12.2 Limitation on Liability. The Employer does not guarantee benefits payable under any insurance policy or other similar contracts described or referred to in the Plan, and any benefits thereunder shall be the exclusive responsibility of the insurer or other entity that is required to provide such benefits under the policy or contract.

12.3 Non-Alienation. No benefit payable at any time under this Plan shall be subject in any manner to alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, attachment, or encumbrance of any kind.

12.4 Exclusive Benefit. The Plan shall be maintained for the exclusive benefit of Employees. Benefits shall be paid only in accordance with the Plan's terms.

Reasonable expenses of administering the Plan may be paid only in accordance with the Plan's terms.

12.5 Applicable Law. The Plan and all rights under the Plan shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of CALIFORNIA, except to the extent preempted by Federal Law.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this Plan to be executed on this 18th day of July, 2022
ATTEST:

By:____________________________
Darlene Gerdes, City Clerk
THE CITY OF CALIMESA, a municipal
corporation of the State of California
By:

Bonnie Johnson, City Manager

SCHEDULE “A”
Schedule of Benefits Miscellaneous Employees
As of July 1, 2022
Miscellaneous Employee Benefits
All employees who are employed on a full-time basis, except seasonal and temporary employees (forty [40] hours per week), shall be eligible for health, dental and vision insurance coverage, which becomes effective 30 days following the hire date and continuing throughout the month of separation. The City provides a Flexible Health Benefit Plan with a monthly amount of $950.00, where employees can choose an appropriate health plan for them and their families.

Holiday’s Observed: New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Day, President’s Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran’s Day, Thanksgiving Day and Friday after Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, New Year’s Eve. 2 floating holidays and employee birthday.

Benefit Description
Health Insurance Health Net and Kaiser Permanente
(Employee and Family Plans)
Dental Insurance Delta Dental
(Employee and Family Plans)
Vision Vision Service Plan (VSP)
(Employee and Family Plans)
Life Insurance Lincoln Life Insurance
(Mgmt. 1.0 times annual salary – all others $50,000)
Flexible Spending
Account
Ceridian
(Optional up to $2,750 per year with a $550.00 rollover option to new plan year) Dependent Care
Account
Ceridian
(Optional $2,500 to $5,000 per year)
Mission Square
Retirement Deferred
Comp
Mission Square Retirement (Formerly ICMA-RC)
(Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan)
AFLAC Voluntary Supplemental Plans available as follows:

Short Term Disability, Accidental, Term Life, Dental, Specified Health Event, Cancer, etc.

CalPERS

RETIREMENT
New hires with recent service with CalPERS, are on the 2% at 60 plan and a 3-year average formula with the City paying the employee rate.

New hires who established CalPERS membership prior to January 1, 2013 and who is hired by a different CalPERS employer after January 1, 2013 after a break in service of greater than six months will pay 6.2% of the employee rate and will be subject to the 2% @ 62 Plan, with a 3-year average formula and a mandatory contribution of normal costs as established by the new Pension Reform Act Law.

New hires with no CalPERS services as of January 1, 2013, will pay 6.2% of the employee rate and will be subject to the 2% @ 62 Plan, with a 3-year average formula and a mandatory contribution of normal costs as established by the new Pension Reform Act Law.

The City does not participate in Social Security.

SCHEDULE “B”
Schedule of Benefits Fire Department Employees
As of July 1, 2022
Fire Department Employee Benefits
All employees who are employed on a full-time basis, except seasonal and temporary employees, shall be eligible for health, dental and vision insurance coverage, which becomes effective 30 days following the hire date and continuing throughout the month of separation. The City provides a Flexible Health Benefit Plan with a monthly amount of $950.00, where employees can choose an appropriate health plan for them and their families. Fringe benefits may be altered on a year-by-year basis as the City may see fit.

Benefit Description
Health Insurance Health Net and Kaiser Permanente
(Employee and Family Plans)
Dental Insurance Delta Dental
(Employee and Family Plans)
Vision Vision Service Plan (VSP)
(Employee and Family Plans)
Life Insurance Lincoln Life Insurance
(Mgmt. 1.0 times annual salary – all others $50,000)
Flexible Spending Account Ceridian
(Optional up to $2,750 per year with a $550.00 rollover option to new plan year) Dependent Care Account Ceridian
(Optional $2,500 to $5,000 per year)
Mission Square
Retirement Deferred
Comp
Mission Square Retirement (Formerly ICMA-RC)
(Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan)
AFLAC Voluntary Supplemental Plans available as follows:

Short Term Disability, Accidental, Term Life, Dental, Specified Health Event, Cancer PARS

RETIREMENT
Fire Department Employees participate in PARS Retirement. City pays 7.5% for the employee. Employee may contribute additional funds to their plan but cannot change the amount once funds are determined. The City does not participate in Social Security.

Fire Department is on a
48/96 Hour Work Schedule
10 PTO days
Per Calendar Year
$600 Annual
Uniform Allowance

SCHEDULE “C”
Employee Benefit Election Form (see following 2 pages)
As of July 1, 2022

City of Calimesa

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ELECTION FORM
Employee Name:_________________________________________________________ Hire Date:_______________________________________________________________ Step 1: Medical Enrollment
Health Net Options
I elect to enroll in the Healthnet Gold 80 Value PPO 750/15 I elect to enroll in the Healthnet Gold 80 PPO 250/25
I elect to enroll in the health Net Platinum 90 PPO 0/15 I elect to enroll in the Value HMO 30 Excel Care GF
Kaiser Options
I elect to enroll in the Kaiser Platinum 90 HMO 0/10 + Child Dental Alternative I elect to enroll in the Kaiser Platinum 90 HMO 0/20 + Child Dental I elect to enroll in the Kaiser Gold 80 HMO 250/35 + Child Dental I decline to enroll in Medical Plans and provide proof of other medical coverage Step 2: Dental Enrollment
Delta Dental
I elect to enroll in Delta Dental Employee Only
I elect to enroll in Delta Dental Employee + One
I elect to enroll in Delta Dental Employee + Family
I decline to enroll in Delta Dental
Step 3: Vision Enrollment
VSP Vision Plan
I elect to enroll in VSP Employee Only
I elect to enroll in VSP Employee + One
I elect to enroll in VSP Employee + Family
I decline to enroll in VSP Coverage
Step 4: Optional Selections
Flexible Spending Plans (FSA)
I elect to enroll in the FSA Program at no more than $2,850.00 Annually I decline to enroll in the Flexible Spending Plan (FSA) I elect to enroll in the Dependent Care Flexible Spending Plan $2,500 to no greater than $5,000 I decline to enroll in the Dependent Care Flexible Spending Plan (FSA)

Deferred Compensation (Mission Square Retirement- formerly ICMA) I elect to enroll in the Deferred Compensation 457 Program I decline to enroll in the Deferred Compensation 457 Program I elect to enroll in AFLAC Supplemental Insurance Plans I decline to enroll in AFLAC Supplemental Insurance Plans _______________________________________________________________________ Employee Signature Date
This completed Employee Benefit Election Form along with enrollment forms must be returned to Human Resources

City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 8
SUBJECT: FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT
SERVICES FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE CITY’S HOME INVESTMENT

PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM (HOME) GRANT FUNDED HOUSING

REHABILITATION PROGRAM
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2022
PRESENTED BY: Bonnie Johnson, City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully recommended that the City Council approve the Fourth Amendment to the Agreement with Michael Baker International, Inc. to provide professional consultant services for the administration of the Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME) and Grant Funded Housing Rehabilitation Program.

DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY: On October 12, 2016, the City of Calimesa received an award from the California State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for funding under the HOME program in the amount of $508,400 to provide deferred, zero interest loans in an amount up to $40,000 to qualifying families with low to moderate incomes. Applicants are required to own and occupy their homes and be in need of financial assistance in order to make repairs and other minor improvements. The loan is paid back to the City when the property is sold or transferred to another party.

On February 20, 2017, the City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Michael Baker International, Inc. (MBI) for $108,400 to provide professional consultant services for the setup and administration of the City’s HOME funded Rehabilitation Loan Program, utilizing funds from the $508,400 award from HCD.

On March 21, 2021, the City approved an amendment wherein the contract term was extend to June 30, 2022, with the City Manager having the option to extend an additional year if performance is satisfactory and Program Income is available to fund said services. In addition, consultant hourly rates were also revised.

Please note, the City had previously received HOME grants in 2007 and 2012. Although all Grant funds have been expended at this time, the City occasionally receives income from loans paid back as part of the HOME program; this is called “Program Income” (PI). In accordance with guidance from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, these additional PI funds must be incorporated into the City’s current program and spent toward qualifying expenses. In May of 2018, the current agreement with the consultant was amended (First Amendment) to provide for the use of PI as the

initial source of funds to compensate the consultant, however, 31.6% of all PI funds received (10% for administration and 24% of the remaining 90% for Activity Delivery) must be used in this manner. This requirement provides additional funding for the volume of services that the consultant can perform under the Agreement. The City currently has $164,414 available in PI funds to be used toward consultant expenses and/or future rehabilitations. However, currently, the consultant and City are not planning to conduct any rehabilitation projects due to the lack of availability of the consultant. The consultant is willing however to continue performing the administrative reporting required for all past grants.

Staff is now recommending the Agreement be amended, once again, proposed Fourth Amendment, for the following:
• Extend the current term to June 30, 2023.
• Amend the hourly rates charged by the consultant as reflected in Exhibit C to the Agreement.

FISCAL IMPACT: The funds for the proposed amendment come from Program Income and have no impact to the City’s General Fund. The increase in the total compensation to Michael Baker International, Inc. under this Agreement in Administration or Activity Delivery costs under this contract will be funded by Program Income.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A Fourth Amendment to Agreement with MBI
Attachment B: Original MBI Agreement w/1
st, 2nd & 3rd Amendments attached

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF CALIMESA AND MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE CITY’S HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS

PROGRAM (HOME) GRANT FUNDED HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM This Fourth Amendment (“Fourth Amendment”) is entered into this 18th day of July 2022, by and between the City of Calimesa, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Michael Baker International, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (“Consultant”), and is an amendment to an Agreement that was entered into by City and Consultant on February 21, 2017, as previously amended by a First Amendment dated May 7, 2018, a Second Amendment dated July 20, 2020 and a Third Amendment dated March 15, 2021. City and Consultant may be collectively referred to as “Parties.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Parties entered into an Agreement for professional services on February 21, 2017 (“Agreement”) by which Consultant set up and administered the City’s Home Investment Partnership Program grant funded housing rehabilitation loan program; and WHEREAS, City has requested, and Consultant is willing, to provide additional services under the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, City and Consultant amended the Agreement for Services on May 1, 2018 to include the administration of Program Income (“First Amendment”); and WHEREAS, City and Consultant amended the Agreement for Services on July 20, 2020 to extend the term and the payment rates reflected in Exhibit C (“Second Amendment”); and WHEREAS, City and Consultant amended the Agreement for Services on March 15, 2021 to extend the term and the payment rates reflected in Exhibit C (“Third Amendment”); and WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to further amend the Agreement to, once again, extend the term and revise the payment rates reflected in Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, the funding for services under the Agreement (inclusive of Amendments) will come from Program Income.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Section 1. TERM. is amended to read as follows:

This Agreement commenced on February 21, 2017, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2023, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

2. EXHIBIT C PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE is amended to read as follows:

Attachment 8A

Effective July 1, 2022, for services performed under this Agreement, City shall pay Consultant on an hourly basis in accordance with the following rate schedule:

Role Hourly Rate
Project Manager $150
Housing Rehabilitation Specialist $135
Housing Loan Specialist $135
Environmental Analyst $120
Administrative Support $95

3. In all other respects, the terms and provisions of the Agreement, inclusive of the First, Second and Third Amendments, shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have by their duly authorized representatives executed this Amendment.

CITY OF CALIMESA MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.

By: By:

Name: William Davis Name: William House
Title: Mayor Title: Associate Vice President
By:

Name:

Title:

Attachment 8B

City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9
SUBJECT: APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

CITY AND TKE ENGINEERING, INC FOR DESIGN SERVICES AND

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES RELATED TO THE

COUNTY LINE ROAD CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2022
PREPARED BY: Bonnie Johnson, City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Calimesa approve an amendment to TKE’s Proposal for Design Services to include Construction Management Services associated with the LPP Portion of County Line Road Corridor Improvements.

BACKROUND/DISCUSSION: As the City Council is aware, Calimesa is partnering with the City of Yucaipa to construct street improvements on County Line Road. The project is known as the County Line Road (CLR) Corridor Improvements Project.

The City of Calimesa City Council has taken several actions over the past 3 years to bring this project to fruition. The relevant actions for purposes of background on the current requested action are as follows:

1. April 1, 2019: Resolution 2019-09 approving TKE’s proposal for Design Services related to the CLR Corridor Improvements Project as well as Webb Associates for Environmental Compliance Services proposal (see attached)

2. February 7, 2022: Award of Construction Contract for CLR Corridor Improvements Project and related actions including fair share breakdown by city (of note – authorizing $880,000 for construction management, geotechnical and surveying) (see attached)

3. February 22, 2022: Amending agreement with Yucaipa for fair share on CLR corridor Improvement Project and Resolution 2022-07 authorizing a budget adjustment for Calimesa’s fair share including contingency (see attached)
Prior actions amended all relevant agreements and budgets with the exception of the proposal from TKE for Design Services approved by the City Council on April 1, 2019. This proposal was approved pursuant to Exhibit B, Scope of Services as Provided by Consultant (In Addition to Services Under Section 2 of this Agreement) as part of the Agreement for Engineering Services between the City and TKE Engineering dated October 1, 2012 and still in effect. As such, this requested contract amendment is a housekeeping item to ensure the 2012 Agreement has been properly updated and payments can be made to TKE for services rendered without interruption.

The TKE CLR Corridor Improvements Project proposal is recommended to be amended for the following and incorporated as Exhibit B-2 to the 2012 Agreement:
• An amendment (change order) for design services in the amount of $129,200 which is detailed in the attached letter and included by both cities in the amended budget and agreements.
• An amendment to incorporate the $880,000 construction management budget approved on February 7, 2022 and incorporated by both cities in the amended budget and agreements.

FISCAL IMPACT: Exhibit B to TKE’s Agreement for Engineering Services will be amended to include $511,800 plus 10% contingency (Exhibit B-1), a change order referenced above in the amount of $129,200 and the previously approved (February 7th) construction management in the amount of $880,000 (Exhibit B-2) bringing the amended budget for TKE to $1,521,000. The City’s CIP Budget was previously amended on February 22, 2022. As such, no additional appropriation is being requested.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A: Amendment to TKE Engineering Services Agreement for CLR Corridor Improvements Project
Attachment B: TKE Engineering, Inc. Change Order Letter (Exhibit B-2) Attachment C: TKE Engineering Proposal approved on April 1, 2019 (Exhibit B-1) Attachment D: TKE Agreement for Engineering Services dated October 1, 2012 (for reference only)
Attachment E: Staff report and attachments from February 7, 2022 Council Meeting (for reference only)
Attachment F: Staff report and Resolution from February 22, 2022 Council Meeting (for reference only)

AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
CALIMESA AND TKE ENGINEERING, INC. FOR DESIGN ENGINEERING

SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES

RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE COUNTY LINE ROAD

CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
This Amendment (“Amendment”) is entered into this 18th day of July 2022, by and between the City of Calimesa, a municipal corporation (“City”) and TKE Engineering, Inc., a California corporation (“Consultant”), and is amending the Scope of Services attached as Exhibit B to an Agreement for Engineering Services between the City and TKE Engineering (“TKE”) dated October 1, 2012 (hereinafter “Master Agreement”). City and Consultant may be collectively referred to as “Parties.” WHEREAS, the Cities of Calimesa and Yucaipa are collaborating on construction of roadway and drainage improvements along County Line Road (CLR) between Park Avenue and Bryant Street (“Project”); and
WHEREAS, since the proposed improvements are located in both cities, the cities have executed two fair share agreements that identified the funding obligations of both cities, namely the Fair Share Agreement with the City of Yucaipa for County Line Road Corridor Improvements from Calimesa Boulevard to Bryant Street (the “2018 Fair Share Agreement”) approved in 2018 and the Fair Share Agreement County Line Road Corridor Improvements from Calimesa Boulevard to Bryant Street (the “2020 Fair Share Agreement”) approved in 2020 and specific to the SB 1 Local Partnership Program Grant; and
WHEREAS, Section E 2) of the Master Agreement requires TKE to “provide other services as requested by the City and as provided in Exhibit B”; and WHEREAS, Exhibit B provides that TKE will perform a wide range of services, including design engineering services and construction administration services; and WHEREAS, on April 1, 2019, the City Council approved a proposal, dated October 25, 2018, from TKE, related to the design services on the Project referenced above, which was incorporated into the Scope of Services attached as Exhibit B to the Master Agreement; and
WHEREAS, on August 24, 2021, the City received two bids for Project construction and, due to a variety of factors, the bid amounts received far exceeded the construction budget; and
WHEREAS, on October 18, 2022, staff recommended, and the City Council approved, rejecting all bids, permitting staff to rescope the Project to reduce costs, rebid the Project, and bring a subsequent recommendation of award back to City Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, on January 19, 2022, the City received 5 bids and awarded a contract

to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder on February 7, 2022; and WHEREAS, based upon the bid award, the funding obligations for both cities have changed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council on February 22, 2022 deemed it appropriate to amend the 2020 Fair Share Agreement (referenced above) to reflect the updated funding obligations for each city and to amend the City of Calimesa’s Capital Improvement Program Budget accordingly; and
WHEREAS, the Parties must now further amend the Scope of Services attached as Exhibit B to the Master Agreement to reflect the approval of a change order and include construction management services.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows::

Section 1. The Scope of Work attached as Exhibit B to the Master Agreement is hereby amended to include: (a) a change order for design services in the amount of $129,200; and (b) construction management services in the amount of $880,000.

Section 2. Attached hereto as Attachment A and incorporated by this reference is a letter dated July 11, 2022, which details the change order and sets forth the construction management services for the Project. TKE’s proposal approved by the City Council on April 1, 2019 shall be attached to the Master Agreement as Exhibit B-1. The July 11, 2022 letter, attached hereto as Attachment A, shall be attached to the Master Agreement as Exhibit B-2.

Section 3. Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, all other provisions of the Master Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the day and year first shown above.

CITY OF CALIMESA
_____________________________________

WILLIAM DAVIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________

DARLENE GERDES, CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM
_________________________________
QUINN M. BARROW, CITY ATTORNEY

CONSULTANT
TKE ENGINEERING, INC. (TKE)
By:

Name: Michael P. Thornton
Title: President
By:

Name:

Title: Secretary

Section A: Project Understanding and Approach
Section B: Scope of Work
Section C: Project Team
Section D: Qualifications and Experience
Section E: Cost Proposal
Prepared for:

City of Calimesa
908 Park Avenue
Calimesa, CA 92320
Contact: Lori Askew
Public Works Director
Phone: (909) 864-8732
E-mail: [email protected]
Prepared by:

TKE Engineering, Inc.
2305 Chicago Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
Contact: Terry Renner, P.E., Q.S.D.

Vice President
Phone: (951) 680-0440
E-mail: [email protected]

CONTACT INFORMATION

SECTION A: PROJECT UNDERSTANDING

AND APPROACH

1. COMPANY OVERVIEW
TKE Engineering, Inc. (TKE), was established in
2000, and in the last eighteen years has
developed into one of Southern California’s
premier full service consulting engineering firms.

TKE was established with the goal of providing
turnkey service for municipal projects in order to
benefit our community. As a result of the focus
of a firm on this mission, TKE has earned a
reputation for thoroughness, rapid turnaround,
cost efficiency and overall quality of work. We
are a highly motivated, dynamic firm with the
goal of being your preferred consultant.

2. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The City of Calimesa (City) desires to retain
professional engineering and environmental
services for the County Line Road Transportation
Corridor Improvements Project. The project will
complete the ultimate improvements along
County Line Road from Park Avenue to Bryant
Street. The project includes State grant funding
through the SB1 Local Partnership Program
(LPP). The City desires a consultant that will
provide all necessary efforts to provide overall
project management, perform environmental
analysis, secure environmental clearance,
prepare engineering design including all support
services such as geotechnical investigations and
surveying, obtain funding allocation request with
the California Transportation Commission (CTC)
prior to construction, provide engineering
consultation services during the construction
bidding phase, comply with all state grant
funding program requirements, as required.

TKE has been intricately involved with the project
development and requests for grant funding
related to this project. TKE prepared the
conceptual layout drawings, assisted with grant
application preparation and preliminary cost
estimate preparation. The proposed project
scope includes street, intersection, pedestrian,
and bicycle improvements along County Line
Road. As indicated in the grant applications, the
project is intended to improve transportation
safety and efficiency, reduce fuel consumption,
reduce vehicle emissions and noise pollution,
improve area aesthetics and promote economic
development, and to extend the service life of
the public infrastructure. The proposed
improvements will also help to encourage nonmotorized transportation through enhanced visibility and improved accessibility to activity
centers and public transit.

The improvements will include curb and gutter,
sidewalks, driveways, street lights, ADA curb
ramps, bus stop accessibility, non-motorized
access enhancements at bus stops and
roundabout intersections, landscape and
irrigation of drought tolerant plants within the
roundabouts, signage, striping, and associated
street improvements required to widen the
roadway and construct the bike lanes and
pedestrian enhancements. Numerous existing
structures and residential improvements will be
impacted by the sidewalk improvements. In
areas where these improvements are impacted,
the improvements can be modified to help
reduce mitigation requirements.

TKE has a long history of delivering street
improvement projects for several of the
surrounding communities in which we live and
work on a daily basis including numerous
projects with the City and projects directly within
the limits of the proposed project limits. From
our first project in 2000 to our latest project of
this type, Foothill Boulevard from Oleander
Avenue to Cypress Avenue, TKE has always
understood the importance of these projects to
the local community. Because of the current
budgetary constraints, we understand the
importance of maximizing the amount of
improvements that can be built with available
funding. TKE accomplishes this through creative
engineering techniques and a collaborative effort
between the public agencies and the community.

Our team has demonstrated the ability to build
project coalitions time and time again.

Finally, it doesn’t matter how much community
support that’s developed if the project isn’t
delivered! We understand how important time
and budget are to this project. Since the City has
desires to enhance public improvements, it is
important to have a proactive approach to
project completion. This way, alternative design
methods can be explored and implemented to
keep the project within budget and on schedule.

3. PROJECT APPROACH
Successful project delivery is our goal. Our
definition of successful project delivery is:

• Project completion that meets all project
requirements through:
o Project Programming
o Site Planning
o Topographic Surveying
o Preliminary Design
o Environmental Compliance
o Program Verification
o Design:
▪ Schematic Design
▪ Design Development
▪ Construction Documents
▪ Specifications
o Bidding Assistance
o Construction Assistance
• Project completion on schedule
• Project completion within budget
Our goal is not limited to the design of the project
only, but includes the incorporation of value
engineering and constructability review.

Through the examination of specific design
alternatives, we will identify the most cost
effective project alternative that meets design
requirements and will provide for the greatest
opportunity for expedited construction, which
allows us to consistently deliver projects that use
public resources in a very wise and responsible
manner. We have developed this project
approach in order to maintain an expertise in our
core business of projects with tight budgetary
constraints.

Our approach to your State funded project,
recognizing that schedule and budget are of
primary concern, dictates that design and
construction decisions must be made both
quickly and carefully. When this is coupled with
the various constraints present with any grant
funded project, it is critical that the City choose
a consultant with a proven track record of
delivering. With a familiar team of senior level
design and construction professionals, TKE is the
right choice for this project.

With projects of this nature, our experience tells
us that there must be a proactive approach to
completing the work in order to meet scheduling,
community and grant requirements. This
approach includes early identification of critical
design elements, familiarity with grant funding
requirements, early community coordination for
relocation coordination and accurate cost
estimating throughout the entire process. In
preparing this proposal, our team spent
numerous hours reviewing the project site,
existing infrastructure, City and funding
application goals and project constraints to
establish key issues so we can be prepared to
mobilize on a moment’s notice to assist you.

Critical Issues
TKE’s prior knowledge and understanding of the
project requirements is the key to successfully
overcoming project challenges within the
proposed project schedule. TKE has been
working with the City for the past several years
allowing TKE to develop a much greater project
understanding and this will allow TKE to begin
work on critical issues immediately after the
project is awarded.

Familiarity with Funding Source
TKE is well versed with Caltrans Local Assistance
requirements as well as the general guidelines
for implementing Federally and State funded
grant projects. They include:
• Requesting that Caltrans furnish an
expenditure authorization number.
• Submitting allocation request and finance
letters to Caltrans Local Assistance
requesting reimbursable costs allocation
• Ensuring Caltrans prepares a Program
Supplement Agreement for City
execution. If the City does not have a
“State Funds Master Agreement” on file
with Caltrans, one will be required.
• Ensuring that the City acquires Local
Assistance approval for all required
environmental clearances (CEQA) and
right-of-way needed for the project.

• Ensuring that the project complies with
the requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.
• Processing invoices to Caltrans Local
Assistance for reimbursement.

While administering the City’s LPP grant will
follow a slightly different process with the CTC,
such as preparing a Funding Allocation Request
in lieu of a typical Authorization to Proceed
request, our past experience with the Caltrans
Local Assistance process will serve as a vital
asset in navigating this new process with both
CTC and Caltrans.

Project Schedule
With grant funded projects, maintaining the
proposed schedule is critical. During preparation
of the grant application exhibits and other project
designs, TKE has already prepared base mapping
for portions of the project limits. This will provide
TKE the opportunity to immediately begin work
on critical path items which will provide an
extensive head start and shorten overall project
delivery time.

Right-of-Way Acquisition
Upon determination of roundabout limits, TKE
will assess right-of-way needs at each
intersection. Based on our preliminary analysis,
right-of-way may be required for construction of
each roundabout intersection. In addition, right
of entries or temporary construction easements
may be needed for private improvement
restoration for a majority of properties along
County Line Road.

Street, Driveway and Property Transitions
For sidewalk improvement projects, transitions
to existing improvements are typically the most
challenging component of design. TKE will review
survey data well into the properties and design
improvements to be constructed within existing
right-of-way.

Agency Coordination
As a joint funded project with both City of
Calimesa and City of Yucaipa funding,
coordination between each agency throughout
the design process will be critical to ensure each
agencies standards and design preferences are
incorporated. TKE has established great working
relationships and has direct coordination
experience with both agencies on similar joint
street improvement projects and will use that
experience to ensure coordination is maintained
throughout the project.

Utility Coordination
Again, based on field review, numerous utilities
will require adjustment. These facilities include
water meters, traffic signal boxes, risers, drain
inlets, and utility vaults. Again, we will identify
these facilities early in project design to begin
coordination at the earliest opportunity. Agencies
that maintain private utilities can be
cumbersome in getting facilities adjusted. Early
coordination will prevent project delays.

Pavement Rehabilitation
Review of the pavement conditions on County
Line Road indicate that pavement is in fair
condition and will not require complete removal
and replacement. TKE will review the pavement
conditions and offer alternatives which have
varying life expectancies, upon the City’s
request. Included with the geotechnical services
presented in the scope of services is pavement
design. Samples will be taken in the street
subgrade for laboratory testing to determine the
correct section for street design.

Accurate Cost Estimating
Because of the limited budget, it is vital to keep
costs controlled. Our approach to controlling
costs is to provide frequent and accurate cost
estimates by using TKE’s detailed cost estimating
database. In addition to using this database, TKE
utilizes our considerable experience with
Construction Management to assist in providing
constructability reviews and cost estimating
based on current information from our on-going
projects. Finally, with the current economic
climate, construction costs are widely varying.

We will also discuss the project’s elements with
local contractors to assure that we have the most
current construction information available so that
the City can get the most “bang for their buck”.

SECTION B: SCOPE OF WORK
TKE’s Scope of Professional Services is presented
in the following paragraphs:

Task No. 1 – Project Management
TKE’s Project Manager will be responsible for the
entire project team. He will attend all meetings,
prepare agendas and corresponding meeting
minutes together with collection of signatures for
meeting attendees (sign-in sheets). He will meet
with the City at appropriate times and will meet
as needed with agencies, utilities and project
team in addition to the meetings presented
below. He will also update the project budget and
schedule prior to each City meeting for
discussion with staff.

Task No. 2 – Initial ‘Kick Off’ Meeting
Prior to commencement of services, we propose
to meet City of Calimesa and Yucaipa staff to
review project obligations and to discuss all
project requirements in detail. In addition, we
will discuss the Project’s scope of services and
our detailed project schedule. We also utilize this
meeting to reach agreement on a communication
protocol and to acquire both agencies existing
utility plans, survey data and/or street
improvement plans.

Task No. 3 – Records Research
We will thoroughly research existing utility
records and acquire copies of all available
records. The purpose of the records research is
to assemble survey records to establish locations
of street centerlines and street rights-of-way and
determine locations of all existing utilities and
improvements.

The research will consist of assembling copies of
assessors’ maps, tract maps, parcel maps,
monument ties, benchmark data, corner records,
street improvement plans, and utility drawings.

We will request both agencies provide copies of
available pertinent city records, such as survey
ties, benchmarks, and street, and/or drain
improvement plans.

We will notify Underground Service Alert to
acquire a complete list of underground utility
purveyors. The utility drawings will include
existing drawings from the Cities, and drawings
and/or atlas maps from all private utility
companies, and/or agencies. We will confer and
coordinate with the following agencies as well as
any additional agencies listed in the Underground
Service Alert:
➢ South Mesa Water Company
➢ Yucaipa Valley Water District
➢ Frontier (Verizon)
➢ AT&T and PacBell
➢ Sprint
➢ Southern California Gas Co.
➢ Southern California Edison
➢ Time Warner Cable Television
We will send first utility notice letters to all listed utility companies and agencies requesting their
data. We will maintain copies of the letters and
correspondence for future reference. We shall
also provide the City with a complete copy of all
correspondence with all utility companies. We
will prepare a brief outline of all utility relocation
costs to be incurred by the City, as well as
impacts to the project schedule for any utility
relocations and include it with our utility
correspondence package.

Task No. 4 – Design Survey
TKE will conduct a conventional design survey of
the project area due to the level of detail needed
for precise grading design for street
improvements. Our field survey crews will locate
existing street centerline monuments and they
will be denoted on the drawings. The crew will
measure the horizontal angle, horizontal
distance, and vertical elevation difference
between monuments. We will complete a
traverse for each survey to ensure closure.

Elevations will be tied to existing City
benchmarks. Our field survey crews will collect
appropriate detail as required to prepare a
topographic map for the entire reach of County
Line Road from Park Avenue to Bryant Street.

Note, the reaches between 3rd Street and 2nd
Street and 2nd Street and California Street are
not a part of this project and data through those
section (i.e. outside the intersections) will be
limited. The topographic map shall be 80 to 120-
feet wide on County Line Road and shall extend
100-feet beyond project limits. In addition, we
will collect 50-foot cross sections on County Line
Road with shots extending to full width right-ofway on each side, survey data will include trees over 2-inches in diameter, buildings, walkways,

sidewalks, driveways, curbs, gutters, cross
gutters, fire hydrants, water valves, manholes,
water meters, signs, street lights, power poles,
fences, structure, traffic signal poles and all other
visible features. Further, the intersections of 5th
Street, 3rd Street, 2nd Street, California Street,
and Bryant Street will all be thoroughly detailed
for roundabout design.

Our crews will set 100-foot stationing along
street centerlines and collect existing topography
as needed to provide sufficient level of detail for
precise design. The crew will also measure
invert, top of cone and rim elevations for all
existing manholes in the project area and invert
and rim elevations for all drainage facilities. The
crew will set temporary benchmarks within the
project limits and each will be shown on the
survey control drawings.

Task No. 5 – Base Construction Drawings
Utilizing the provided survey data, we will
prepare the base construction drawings on 24”
by 36” sheets with the City’s standard title block
using AutoCAD 2015 software, utilizing our
standard layering system, at a drawing scale of
1”=40’. The base construction drawings will
include a plan view based on conventional survey
data. We will add the sheet north arrow, graphic
scale, existing improvements and utilities (based
on both assembled records and field data),
property lines, public and private right-of-way,
easement areas, assessor parcel numbers, street
centerline, street names, building locations,
water service location; sewer manhole lids and
water valve lids; cross gutters; driveways,
pedestrian ramps; traffic stripes and legends;
curb returns; details of private improvements,
fences, gates, irrigation systems, mailboxes,
trees and landscaping, and survey data to the
plan view portion of the drawings. Once the base
drawings are complete, we will perform a careful
field review to ensure all underground facilities
are shown correctly.

Task No. 6 – Topographic Map / Survey
Control Plan
We will prepare a topographic map for the entire
reach of the project. The topographic map shall
be between 80 and 120-feet wide (40 to 60 feet
each side of the centerline) and shall extend 100
feet beyond the project limits. The map shall be
prepared in AutoCAD format at 1”=40’ scale and
shall include 1 foot contours.

A survey control plan shall be prepared and shall
show all existing found monumentation,
benchmarks, ties and temporary control points.

All found monumentation will include
descriptions and tie-out information.

The survey control plan will be provided to the
City in hard copy (bond) and digital (AutoCAD
and PDF) formats.

Task No. 7 – Composite Utility Plan
TKE will prepare a composite utility plan which
identifies all existing utilities within the proposed
right-of-way and all utilities affected by the
proposed street improvements and requiring
adjustment or relocation. The plan shall show all
above and below ground utilities including all
laterals. The utility plan will be used in
coordinating with utility companies.

Task No. 8 – Geometric Alignment Design
(30% Design)
Geometric configuration for the two lane
roundabout at 5th Street and the single lane
roundabouts at 3rd, 2nd, California, and Bryant
Streets will require extensive coordination
between TKE and the City to determine the
preferred alignment configuration that will
balance the roundabouts functionality and
performance versus its safety and fastest path,
while considering right-way impacts. The central
island size, entry width, lane width and entry
deflection angle will require extensive analysis to
develop the appropriate dimensions for each to
meet City goals and provide a functional and safe
roundabout. Using the topographic and base
mapping, TKE will prepare the roundabout
geometric alignment to be used for analyzing the
proposed speeds through the roundabout,
inscribed circle diameter, entry width, circulatory
roadway width, central island, entry and exit
curves, splitter islands and pedestrian crossing
treatments, fastest path review versus
operational functionality for the design vehicle,
stopping sight distance, intersection sight
distance and non-motorized design users. The
geometric analysis will follow the Federal
Highway Administration design guidelines for
roundabouts. Upon completion of the alignment
design, TKE will present the information to the
City for approval.

In addition, we will prepare preliminary
construction drawings showing proposed street

improvements. Proposed improvements will be
designed in accordance with the City’s current
street design standards and specifications for
ultimate street widening. Of note, with the
incorporation of roundabouts, the 44-foot wide
ultimate street half width will not be required
between 5th Street and Bryan Street. We will
include proposed curb, sidewalk, driveway and
ramp locations to assess right-of-way
requirements. We will show the typical street
section incorporating a 30-foot wide half width,
existing utility and improvement locations,
existing drainage improvements, existing rightof-way, proposed right-of-way requirements at each intersection, and right-of-way exhibit.

We will prepare quantity estimates for all
proposed improvements. In addition, we will
prepare a preliminary construction cost estimate
using an Excel spreadsheet. Descriptions of
work, unit prices, and quantities will be included
in the spreadsheet.

Task No. 9 – 30% Design Review Meeting
After the City has completed its review of the
30% Design, we will meet with City staff to
acquire Staff’s comments. It is anticipated that
the City of Yucaipa will be involved in the plan
check process and subsequent 30% design
review meeting. Once the Cities have provided
approval of the geometric layout and analysis,
TKE will use the accepted layout for preparation
of the construction documents.

Task No. 10 – Geotechnical Investigation
We would propose to retain LOR Geotechnical
Group, Inc. (LOR) as a sub consultant to provide
Geotechnical services for the project. LOR will
provide geotechnical evaluations and
recommendations of grading, earthwork, and
pavement design. They will perform the
following:
• Drilling, sampling and logging of necessary
borings for evaluation of street structural
section. LOR will notify Underground
Service Alert and will provide necessary
traffic control for the field operations. The
borings will be drilled to a depth of at least
five feet. The asphalt pavement thickness
and base thickness will be noted during the
boring operations.
• Design of street structural section using the
City’s provided traffic indices.
• Laboratory testing of representative soil
samples to evaluate in-situ moisture
content, density tests, max density and
optimum tests, sieve analysis, R-value,
direct shear tests, consolidation and
collapse tests and corrosivity
characteristics of the on-site soils.
• Data compilation and geotechnical analysis
of existing geotechnical maps, reports, and
field and laboratory data to provide
recommendations for pavement design.

Analysis will include recommendations for
new pavement section alternatives, based
on the traffic indices and R-value testing.
• Preparation of a report presenting our
findings, conclusions and recommendations
pertaining to design, compaction
requirements, and subgrade preparation
for each street. In addition, the report will
provide recommendations for asphalt
pavement recycling and other
recommendations, which would include
cost saving treatment methods.

Task No. 11 – Right-of-Way Engineering
After 30% design is complete, we will prepare
and maintain a right-of-way acquisition map and
will update it as right-of-way progresses. The
map will show all required rights-of-way for
project construction. The map will be prepared
on a 24” by 36” sheet with City Standard title
block using AutoCAD 2015 software at an
appropriate drawing scale. All parcels will be
identified with Assessor Parcel Number, width of
required right-of-way acquisition and total
acquisition area.

TKE will prepare all necessary final right-of-way
documents for the project including permanent
and temporary construction right-of-way deeds
and easements. We will prepare legal
descriptions and plats for each parcel requiring
acquisition and, working with the City, we will
attend two negotiation meetings with each
property owner to negotiate the acquisition. If
after two meetings a negotiated position has not
been reached, the City will need to provide
additional direction. TKE anticipates right-of-way
document preparation for all four corner
properties at the proposed roundabout
intersections, approximately 20 parcels. Rightof-way documents would be prepared in accordance with the City requirements.

TKE is available to work with the City’s land
appraisal consultant, should any full takes be
required.

Task No. 12 – 60% Design
60% Design will include preparation of
construction drawings, technical specifications,
construction estimates, completed geotechnical
report, environmental documents, and
approvals.

Construction drawings will show proposed street
and intersection geometrics including locations of
proposed curb, drive approaches, sidewalk,
median, swales, ramps, spandrels and cross
gutters. In addition, street grades will be
prepared to establish project grading
requirements. Proposed improvements will be
designed in accordance with the City’s current
street and drainage design standards and
specifications for ultimate street widening. The
proposed improvements will be designed to
minimize grading, earthwork and transitions onto
private property.

For the drawings, it is estimated we will prepare
1 title sheet, 2 construction notes sheets, 8
demolition sheets, 27 plan/profile sheets, 5
drainage sheets, 5 cross-section sheets, 13
landscape and irrigation sheets, 3 street lighting
sheets, 15 electrical sheets, 8 signing and
striping sheets, and necessary detail sheets.

The title sheet shall include the title of the job, a
vicinity map showing the City in relationship to
surrounding communities, a location map
showing the project limits, construction notes, an
index for the drawings, list of references on the
City’s standard title block.

The construction note sheets will show general
construction notes, a list of abbreviations used,
benchmark data, general notes, utilities with
phone numbers, and project specific
requirements.

The demolition sheets will show existing
improvement demolition including limits of
pavement removal, saw cutting locations and
limits and concrete cross gutters and curbs, if
required. In addition, the plan will specify
relocation of private improvement such as
mailboxes fences, etc. as required.

Plan/profile sheets will show proposed
improvements including curb and gutter,
roundabout median curbs, sidewalks, handicap
ramps, driveways, pavement limits, storm drain
pipe, manholes, catch basins, overlay limits,
signs, traffic stripes, existing utility relocations (if any), water service relocations, and sewer
manhole, valve, and vault cover grade
adjustments. For the profile portion of the
drawings, we will show existing and proposed
pavement elevations at centerline and existing
edge of pavement on both sides of the streets
with appropriate design data together with
proposed top of curb elevations.

The drainage sheets will be prepared in
accordance with City standards and
requirements. The sheet will be prepared at a
1”=20’ scale and will show existing right-of-way,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, existing utilities, existing
right-of-way, curb, gutter, sidewalk, existing
utilities, existing drainage improvements and all
proposed improvements including catch basins,
pipe and connections. Storm drain sheets will
show top of pipe, flowline, structures utility
crossings and ground surface.

The street cross-sections sheets will show street
sections at appropriate drawing scales. The
sections will be dimensioned and construction
and demolition notes will be shown. In addition,
rights-of-way and limits of work will be shown.

Landscape and irrigation sheets will include
design for the landscaping within the proposed
roundabouts. The sheets will include the point of
connection, irrigation layout and planting
materials to be installed and shall be in
conformance with City standards, specifications,
ordinances, regulations and requirements.

Street lighting sheets will be prepared in
accordance with City standards and
requirements. The sheets will be prepared at a
1”=20’ scale and will show existing right-of-way,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, existing utilities, existing
right-of-way, curb, gutter, sidewalk, existing
utilities, existing and proposed street light
improvements and all proposed modifications
including conduit extension and head
replacements.

The electrical sheets will include design for
decorative lighting at each roundabout
intersection, including splitter islands to
accommodate pedestrian warning lighting. The
sheets will be prepared at a 1”=20’ scale and will
show existing right-of-way, curb, gutter,

sidewalk, existing utilities, existing right-of-way,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, existing utilities, existing
and proposed electrical improvements and
connections.

The signing and striping sheets will include all
required pavement markings, lane stripes and
signage in accordance with the MUTCD,
California supplement and all other applicable
City requirements, for the project limits. The
sheets will be prepared at 1”=40’ scale and
include full geometrical layouts at each
intersection.

For the specifications, we will amend the City
Standards Technical Provisions as required for
the projects. The construction specifications will
be prepared in Microsoft Word (2016 Version)
format in accordance with City standards.

In addition, we will prepare quantity estimates
for all proposed improvements prepared using an
excel spreadsheet showing an itemized
construction cost breakdown. Descriptions of
work, unit prices, and quantities will be included
in the spreadsheet.
60% Design (construction drawings, technical
specifications, construction estimates, completed
geotechnical report, environmental documents
and right-of-way documents and approvals) will
be submitted with a project summary
memorandum together with an updated project
schedule, utility contact matrix, stakeholder
meeting summary, and internal plan review
documentation.

Task No. 13 – Coordination / Permitting
with Agencies / Utilities
After 60% design is complete, plans will be sent
to agencies having facilities in the project areas
requesting that they verify their facilities are
shown correctly and that they furnish any
construction requirements they desire. We will
begin coordination for permit acquisition and / or
highlight each agency’s facilities and advise each
of potential conflicts and relocation
requirements. We will request that they respond
within two weeks and we will follow up with
telephone calls to confirm all agency
requirements have been incorporated. We will
document all conferences with utilities and
agencies and copy the City via e-mail.

Task No. 14 – 60% Design Review Meeting
After the City has completed its review, we will
meet with City staff to acquire Staff’s comments.

It is anticipated that the City of Yucaipa will be
involved in the 60% plan check process and
subsequent 60% design review meeting.

Task No. 15 – 90% Design
90% design will include incorporation of City
comments, revised plans, specifications, and
estimates.
90% Design will be submitted with a project
summary memorandum together with an
updated project schedule and cost estimate.

Task No. 16 – 90% Design Review Meeting
After the City has completed its review, we will
meet with City staff to acquire Staff’s comments.

It is anticipated that the City of Yucaipa will be
involved in the 90% plan check process and
subsequent 90% design review meeting.

Task No. 17 – Final Documents
Final documents will include incorporation of City
final comments, and final documents ready for
public bidding. Final documents will include
mylars and hard copy specifications and
estimates with signatures and electronic copies
of final documents.

Task No. 18 – Final Coordination /
Permitting with Agencies / Utilities
After the final drawings are approved by the City,
we will again submit them to all agencies/utilities
with permitting authority or having facilities in
the project areas requesting that they verify their
facilities are shown correctly and that they
furnish any construction requirements they
desire, having underground facilities in the
project area requesting that they verify their
facilities are shown correctly and we will advise
them of the project construction schedule and
relocation requirements and complete any
required permit applications. In addition, we will
coordinate final relocation construction prior to
project bidding. We will document all meetings
and conferences with utilities and agencies.

Lastly, TKE will prepare and submit a funding
allocation request with the CTC to ensure LPP
grant funding is available prior to construction.

Task No. 19 – Bidding Assistance
TKE will assist the City during project bidding by
providing the plans and specifications to a

minimum of 3 plan rooms. In addition, we will
provide the City with 25 copies of the approved
plans and specifications for bidding. We will
answer questions about or provide clarifications
of the contract documents as requested by the
City, and will prepare addenda if necessary.

Task No. 20 – Assistance During
Construction
TKE shall attend the preconstruction meeting and
upon receipt of redlined drawings, TKE will
prepare a complete set of signed and stamped
record drawings, which will reflect the
improvements as constructed; any changes
made during project construction. Said record
drawings will be based on data furnished by the
public agencies, the contractor, and the City.

Other Tasks – Provide Grant Administration
and Reporting
TKE can assist the City with grant administration
and reporting services, if desired. While grant
funding will not be used during the design phase,
SB1 reporting is still required. TKE can serve as
the main point of contact between the City and
CTC and/or Caltrans. In addition, we can
administer the grant during construction on
behalf of the City including:
• Agreement Coordination and Execution
• Project Reporting (e.g. quarterly and
final)
• Project Accounting and Invoicing
• Compliance with Funding Agency Rules
and Regulations (e.g. Right-of-Way
Certification, Environmental Compliance
Documentation, etc.)

SECTION C: PROJECT TEAM

1. STAFFING AND PROJECT ORGANIZATION
TKE has assembled an elite team of professionals to partner with the City to complete this project. Our team has a wealth of experience working together and has developed an excellent working partnership that will be an invaluable resource to the City. Our team has partnered with the City over the past six years which will allow for a seamless transition with providing the required design services. We intend to continue our relationship and to apply our knowledge and experience to your projects. This knowledge improves overall project management, reduces the opportunity for costly mistakes and delays, and allows our staff to provide very effective and efficient service to you. Each of our team members is described in the following paragraphs.

Mr. Terry Renner, P.E., Q.S.D.

Mr. Renner is the Vice President of TKE and has over 18 years of experience in civil engineering infrastructure projects, including street improvement, sidewalk and drainage improvements. He has managed numerous projects and has delivered projects for the Cities of Highland, Fontana, Calimesa, Rialto, Moreno Valley, Lake Elsinore, Upland, Riverside, Redlands, Corona, and El Monte. Mr. Renner has been responsible for design production, supervising a staff of engineers and drafters, coordinating work between the production team and the client, and for submitting all deliverables in a timely manner. He has successfully delivered a wide variety of complex and challenging projects and is dedicated to ensuring that the plans produced by TKE continue to exceed industry standards.

Project Role
Principal in Charge
Mr. Michael L. Heath, P.E.

Project Role
Project Manager
Mike Heath has over 19 years of experience in design and preparation of construction documents for street improvements, pavement rehabilitation, storm drain infrastructure, grading and demolition, water and sewer improvements, and right-of-way engineering. He has provided engineering design for capital improvement program (CIP) projects, staff augmentation, development review, and plan checking services for several municipalities and agencies in the counties of San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, Los Angeles, and San Diego, California.

His experience includes storm drain master plans, hydrology and hydraulic studies, and sewer master plans. Many of his projects have involved pavement rehabilitation, asphalt overlay, curb and gutter replacement, storm drain infrastructure, landscaped medians, signing and striping, signal modifications, traffic improvements, and accessibility pathways in accordance with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Mr. Steven Ledbetter, P.E.

Mr. Ledbetter has over 17 years of professional experience in the civil engineering industry. He has handled various critical and challenging projects from planning through design and implementation; all while ensuring that projects are executed as per specification in the stipulated time with quality.

He has a well-rounded background with experience in: preparation and analysis of street and utility improvement plans and specifications including potable and non-potable water, wastewater, and drainage; utility master planning including computer modeling, analysis, and report preparation; water supply planning including feasibility studies, urban water management plans, water supply assessments and verifications; storm water compliance reporting including water quality management plans and storm water pollution prevention plans and; and grant writing for various State and Federal agencies.

Project Role
Project Engineer
Ms. Michelle Arellano, P.E.

Project Role
Quality Assurance /
Quality Control
Ms. Arellano has a B.S. in Civil Engineering and is a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. Ms. Arellano has over 22 years of experience as a Project Manager. Ms. Arellano has experience with Land Development, Plan Checking and Project Processing. Ms. Arellano provides overall plan checking services for street improvement plans, traffic control plans, grading plans, storm drain improvement plans, hydrology studies and hydraulic analyses, and erosion control plans, and provides independent in-house Quality Control and Quality Assurance.

Mr. Ron Musser, P.L.S.

Mr. Musser has over 50 years of experience in performing field and office surveying services for public and private projects including design surveys and right-of-way acquisition projects. Prior to joining TKE Engineering, Inc., Mr.

Musser worked at the County of Riverside as a County Surveyor for nearly 20 years providing mapping, easement document preparation, field surveying and calculations support for hundreds of projects. He has prepared records of survey, parcel maps, tract maps, right-of-way and easement documents in San Bernardino County, Riverside County, San Diego County, Orange County and Los Angeles County. He has performed boundary, topographic, ALTA, and precise level surveys as well as Global Positioning Surveys.

Project Role
Senior Surveyor
Ms. Monae Pugh
Project Role
Traffic Assistance
Ms. Pugh has over 32 years of Municipal and Public Agency engineering experience with a wide range of responsibilities and projects emphasizing the discipline of Transportation and Traffic Engineering. Her most recent experience includes management of both Land Development and Traffic Engineering Departments for the City of Fontana. Prior experience includes over 16 years in the County of Riverside Traffic Engineering Department. Ms. Pugh has actively pursued continuing education throughout her career through U.C. Berkley extension courses offered by the Institute of Transportation Studies and couples this with functional engineering experience. She is a Certified Grant Writer through Cal State San Bernardino Certification Program and has secured multiple Transportation grants for a wide variety of infrastructure projects.

2. PROFESSIONAL RESUMES
Mr. Terry Renner, P.E., Q.S.D.

Project Role
Principal in Charge
Education
BS, Civil Engineering,
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
Continuing Education
Caltrans SWPPP Certified
QSP/QSD Training
Registration
Registered Civil Engineer,
PE 69984 (CA)
Professional Civil Engineer
#55194 (AZ)
Qualified SWPPP Developer
and Practitioner #24329
Affiliations
Riverside-San Bernardino
Counties Branch, American
Society of Civil Engineers
American Public Works
Association
American Council of
Engineering Companies of
California
Mr. Renner is the Vice President of TKE and has over 18 years of experience in civil engineering infrastructure projects, including transportation improvements, traffic signal improvements, drainage improvements, sewer and water improvements, facilities improvements and recreation improvements. He has managed numerous projects and has delivered projects for Calimesa, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties as well as Cities of Fontana, Upland, Riverside, Redlands, Rialto, Colton, El Monte, Moreno Valley and Corona. As a project manager, Mr. Renner has been responsible for design production, supervising a staff of engineers and drafters, coordinating work between the production team and the client, and for submitting all deliverables in a timely manner. He has successfully delivered a wide variety of complex and challenging projects and is dedicated to ensuring that the plans produced by TKE continue to exceed industry standards.

Related Experience
• San Bernardino Avenue Street Improvements, County of San Bernardino, CA – Mr.

Renner is the Project and Construction Manager for this 8,800 linear feet of street median, sidewalk, traffic signal and storm drain improvements. This project included coordination with Union Pacific Railroad, the City of Fontana and compliance with requirements of a wide variety of funding sources to construct ultimate street widening improvements including median, curb and gutter, sidewalk, landscaping, traffic signal modification, striping, storm drain and sewer crossings and private onsite improvements. The project included right-of-way acquisition for eight parcels.
• Foothill Boulevard Median and Traffic Signal Improvements, City of Fontana, CA – Mr. Renner was the Project Manager for this 1,300 linear feet of median, traffic signal modification, and street widening improvements. The project is between Sierra Avenue and Mango Avenue. Project components included construction of ultimate street widening, median, curb and gutter, sidewalk, traffic signals, striping, and onsite private improvements.
• San Bernardino Avenue Median and Traffic Signal Improvements, City of Fontana, CA – The San Bernardino Avenue median and traffic signal improvements project is located in the City of Fontana north of Interstate 10 Freeway and East of the Interstate 15 Freeway near Commerce Drive. Proposed median and traffic signal improvements were constructed to provide a centralized turning procedure for the Walmart Distribution facility with nearly 1,000 turning movements per day. The project provides for increased vehicular capacity, corridor beautification, and improved traffic and pedestrian safety. Design, construction management, inspection and construction staking is being provided by TKE for the project. TKE provided utility and railroad coordination for the relocation and adjustment of various utility improvements (i.e., power poles, meters, vaults, etc.).

• Foothill Boulevard Median and Traffic Signal Improvements, City of Fontana, Phase II, CA – Mr. Renner was the Project Manager for this project which included 1,900 linear feet of median, traffic signal installation, and street widening improvements. The project is between Oleander Avenue and Juniper Avenue.

Project components included construction of ultimate street widening, median, curb and gutter, sidewalk, traffic signal installation, median landscaping and lighting, striping, and onsite private improvements. The project was a federally funded project (HSIP) which was administered through Caltrans Local Assistance. • Foothill Vision: Street and Recycled Water Improvements, City of Upland, CA – Mr.

Renner was the Project Manager and Design Engineer for the Foothill Vision Project which was the first reach of Foothill Boulevard to be improved to the City’s corridor master plan. The project included 2,800 linear feet of street and recycled water main design along Foothill Boulevard from Redding Way to 2nd Street. The vision project reconstructed Foothill Boulevard to eliminate the existing frontage road and provide a wider street section with large amounts of landscaping to beautify the corridor. Conventional ground design survey, design and construction management services, including preparation of plans, specifications and estimates were provided by TKE for approximately 2,800 linear feet of street improvements, 1,600 linear feet of recycled water improvements, and signing and striping improvements. • Arden Drive Street Improvements, City of El Monte, CA – The Arden Drive Water System, Sewer, and Street Improvements Project is located in the City of El Monte north of the Interstate 10 Freeway on Arden Drive between Valley Boulevard and the BNSF Railroad crossing. Proposed water system, sewer, and street improvements, including traffic signal installation and interconnect conduit were constructed with ARRA funding and schedule requirements. The project provided water line upgrades and construction of additional sewer and street improvements to serve a proposed development for the new public works yard and Department of Motor Vehicles office. Supplemental ground design survey and design services, including preparation of plans, specifications and estimates were provided by TKE for approximately 1,600 linear feet of water, sewer and street improvements, traffic signal and interconnect wiring, and signing and striping improvements.

Mr. Michael L. Heath, P.E.

Project Role
Project Manager
Education
BS, Civil Engineering, Cal
State University at Long
Beach
Registration
Registered Civil Engineer,
PE 63401 (CA)
Affiliations
American Society of Civil
Engineers
American Public Works
Association
Mike Heath has over 19 years of experience in design and preparation of construction documents for street improvements, pavement rehabilitation, storm drain infrastructure, grading and demolition, water and sewer improvements, and right-of-way engineering. He has provided engineering design for capital improvement program (CIP) projects, staff augmentation, development review, and plan checking services for several municipalities and agencies in the counties of San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, Los Angeles, and San Diego, California. His experience includes storm drain master plans, hydrology and hydraulic studies, and sewer master plans. Many of his projects have involved pavement rehabilitation, asphalt overlay, curb and gutter replacement, storm drain infrastructure, landscaped medians, signing and striping, signal modifications, traffic improvements, and accessibility pathways in accordance with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Related Experience
• Juan Street Rehabilitation, City of San Diego, CA – Mr. Heath was the project engineer responsible for coordinating and leading the design and preparation of construction documents for rehabilitation of Juan Street from Taylor Street to Sunset Road. The roadway was Portland cement concrete (PCC) with an inverted crown within the easterly section to convey drainage to the existing underground storm drain system in the westerly section. The existing pavement required total reconstruction. Due to the substantial change in elevations, significant surface drainage issues were addressed during design of the project. The project also included preparation of a hydrology and hydraulic report to determine existing runoff volumes and street capacities, as well as to determine the required drainage system improvements. In addition to roadway reconstruction, the project involved reconstruction of the existing curb and gutter, sidewalks, curb access ramps, and drive approaches to comply with ADA requirements. The project also replaced the existing eight-inch water main with a new 12-inch mainline. New water services were provided, while service was maintained to the existing, historic fire hydrants in the Old Town areas of San Diego.
• Mecca Community ADA Upgrades, Riverside County Transportation Department, Riverside, CA – Mr. Heath was project manager and project engineer responsible for the project management, inspection, design, preparation of construction plans, specifications, and cost estimates. The project involved providing accessibility review and design services on the Mecca Community ADA Compliance Evaluation and Upgrades project. The existing ADA ramps in the Mecca Community were inspected and evaluated to determine compliance with current ADA requirements.

Recommendations were provided for the non-compliant ramps including modifications and reconstruction as needed. Upon completion of the evaluation phase, we coordinated with utility companies and involved agencies to develop improvement plans and estimates for the ADA upgrades. The project also includes

ADA Measurement Orientation training with Riverside County Transportation Department staff.
• Agua Mansa Road and Market Street Intersection Improvements, County of Riverside Transportation Department, Jurupa Valley, CA – Mr. Heath was project manager and project engineer for the design and preparation of construction documents for the pavement rehabilitation and intersection improvements at Agua Mansa Road and Market Street. Responsible for project management, design, preparation of construction plans, specifications, and cost estimates, and oversight of right-of-way documents. The project included pavement rehabilitation on Market Street from Rubidoux Boulevard to 500 feet east of Agua Mansa Road, intersection upgrades at Agua Mansa and Market Street with new traffic signal, signing, striping, and construction of new curb returns ADA-compliant ramps to accommodate greater turn movements and traffic demand. The project also included design of storm drain laterals and catch basins to complete a storm drain improvement project recently constructed by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.

Due to project funding, the original design that included widening was modified to meet the Riverside County Transportation District (RCTD)’s needs. • Newport Road Widening, City of Menifee, CA – Mr. Heath was the project manager and project engineer for design of widening Newport Road between Antelope Road and Menifee Road. Responsible for the project management, design, and preparation of construction plans, specifications, and cost estimates. Design involved road widening to a six-lane arterial between Antelope Road and Menifee Road through reduction of the existing 18-foot median to 12-foot median, and restriping to provide three lanes of through traffic. The outside curbs at the intersection of Antelope Road and Newport Road were widened to accommodate dual left turn lanes from westbound Newport Road to southbound Antelope Road. The existing asphalt concrete was cold milled and used the asphalt base course through a Cold Central Plant Recycling (CCPR) process. The existing aggregate base was mixed to a predetermined depth of the existing subgrade material and PCC to create a Cement Treated Base (CTB) material. The final surface course consists of an Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) pavement.
• Old Elsinore Road, Clark Street, and Rider Street Intersection Improvements, County of Riverside Transportation Department, Perris, CA – Mr. Heath was the project manager and project engineer for the design and preparation of construction documents for intersection widening and improvement project at Old Elsinore Road, Clark Street, and Rider Street. The project consisted of widening the roadway along Old Elsinore Road to include left turn pockets and ultimate curb returns to allow for safer and more efficient traffic and pedestrian movements for the nearby school. The project included the installation of ADA-compliant pedestrian access ramps at the intersection. A slurry seal was applied to the remaining existing pavement within the limits of the project to provide on overall new look to the intersection and to provide the needed preventative maintenance to the existing pavement. A new traffic signal was also designed and installed as part of the project. • Ben Nevis Boulevard Sidewalk Project, County of Riverside Transportation Department, Riverside, CA – Mr. heath was the project manager and project engineer for the design and preparation of construction documents for the Ben Nevis Boulevard sidewalk and street improvements between Conning Street and Lindsay Street. The project consisted of approximately 1,300 feet of curb, gutter, and sidewalk installation on the south side of the roadway. Plans also included driveway

installation for residences along the roadway and construction details for fencing requirements for the residences. The project included the installation of curb returns for ADA pedestrian access ramps at the intersection of Ben Nevis/Lindsay and also included a full-width pavement grind and asphalt concrete (AC) overlay to alleviate some of the cracking in the existing pavement and to extend the life of the roadway section.
• Program Management for Water and Sewer CIP, City of Pomona, CA – Mr. Heath was the assistant program manager and project manager responsible for the City of Pomona's $60 million water and sewer CIP contract. Services included preparing request for proposals (RFP) for design, construction management, field inspection, review of the submitted proposals, and preparation of the city council staff reports with recommendations for selection of the consultant services. The city had identified 75 separate projects, including water mainlines, fire flow upgrades, treatment plant improvements, water well installations, sanitary sewer mainlines, booster pumps, and construction of a one-million-gallon reservoir. In addition to the construction projects, the program included a number of studies related to future programs.
• Sheila Street Improvements, City of Moreno Valley, CA – Mr. Heath was the project engineer responsible for the sidewalk construction along the west side of Sheila Street, the south side of Filaree Avenue from Sheila Street to Perris Boulevard, and the east side of Perris Boulevard from Filaree Avenue to 300 feet south. Also responsible for the design, coordinating the preparation of construction plans and erosion control plans, specifications, and cost estimates. The sidewalk construction was required so children and residents could safely walk to the proposed park at the corner of Filaree Avenue and Sheila Street. The project also involved updating all access ramps within the project limits to ADA-compliant ramps and constructing new ADA- compliant driveways as well.
• Garfield Avenue Sidewalk Improvements, County of Riverside Transportation Department, Riverside, CA – Mr. Heath was the project engineer responsible for design and preparation of construction documents for the minor widening and sidewalk construction along the east side of Garfield Avenue from Spring Street to Center Street. Responsible for design and preparation of construction plans, erosion plans, and cost estimates. The widening and sidewalk construction was required so children could safely walk to the elementary school at the southeast corner of Garfield Avenue and Center Street.
• Adams Avenue Street Improvements, City of Murrieta, CA – Mr. Heath was the project engineer responsible for design and preparation of construction documents for the widening of Adams Avenue from north of Hawthorn Street to Brown Street.

Responsible for design and preparation of construction plans, specifications, erosion plans, and cost estimates. This portion of the roadway required widening to accommodate anticipated traffic for a newly constructed subdivision and to match the existing cross-section north of Hawthorn Street. Duration: 2007-2008 • FY 2005 Street and Drainage Improvements, City of Big Bear Lake, CA – Mr. Heath was the project engineer responsible for the design and preparation of construction documents for street and drainage improvements of seven roads and locations.

Responsible for design, storm drain easement documents, estimates, and coordinating preparation of the construction plans. The main objective of the project was pavement reconstruction and to provide adequate drainage protection on the sides of the roadways to prevent future pavement structural failure. The project

included preparing a hydrology-hydraulic study for two of the locations to adequately size a subsurface storm drain system to reduce the amount of surface flow along the street and on private property. At one of the locations, the storm drain system was meandering within private property, replacing an existing natural channel that no longer functioned properly and caused flooding to existing lots in the area. Most important in the design of all project locations was to limit the amount of export of excess material, since the location of the city is difficult to get to and the costs associated with hauling materials up and down the mountain needed to be kept to a minimum.
• Lincoln Avenue Median Beautification, City of Anaheim, CA – Mr. Heath was the project engineer responsible for the preparation of construction documents for approximately four miles of roadway medians. Plans included field surveys, typical sections, plan and profiles, signing and striping, signal modifications, traffic control, irrigation, planting, specifications and estimates. This beautification project consisted of median modifications and plantings as identified in the city's master plan for the corridor. New median openings were designed at key locations while existing openings were closed where traffic movements were minimal. • Downtown Sidewalk Enhancements, City of Oceanside, CA – Mr. Heath was the project engineer responsible for the design and preparation of all construction documents. Renovations were made to existing parkways that were generally concrete with small tree wells and minimal landscaping. The parkways were designed to incorporate decorative brick inlays with larger tree wells. The landscaping consisted of palm trees and localized shrubbery. Another design component of the project was the curb and gutters as well as drive approaches to complete the enhancement project.
• Direct Buried Cable Replacement Phases 1 and 2, City of Anaheim Public Utilities, CA – Mr. Heath was the project engineer responsible for the preparation of civil base sheets and the improvement profiles for approximately six miles of electrical cable for several areas in the City of Anaheim. Responsible for the preparation of the utility base mapping and public utility easements. The project involved extensive research for existing utilities and mapping as part of the base sheet preparation. Utility easements also had to be prepared where duct banks encroached onto private property.
• La Veta Avenue Widening, City of Orange, CA – Mr. Heath was the project engineer responsible for preparation of street improvement plans for the widening of the roadway between Main Street and Batavia Street and improvements to the off ramp from the 22 Freeway. Responsible for the survey reduction, design, preparation of street and storm drain plans and profiles, details, design cross sections, and cost estimates. Plans included typical sections: street and storm drain improvement plans and profiles, construction details, drainage details, pavement delineation, traffic control and design cross sections.
• Euclid Street Widening, City of Anaheim, CA – Mr. Heath was the project engineer responsible for the street improvement plans for the widening of Euclid Street and the bridge over the Carbon Creek Channel north of Crescent Avenue. Also responsible for survey reduction, design, preparation of street improvement plans and profiles, construction details, typical sections and design cross sections, and cost estimates. Plans included typical sections, plan and profiles, construction details, pavement delineation, and design cross sections.

• Walnut Avenue Street Improvements, City of Orange, CA – Mr. Heath was the project engineer responsible for preparation of street improvement plans for pavement reconstruction of approximately 1,000 linear feet between Cypress Street and Glassell Street. Designed and prepared street improvement plans, profiles, and cost estimates.
• 2000-01 Street Maintenance Program, City of Villa Park, CA – Mr. Heath was the design engineer responsible for the rehabilitation improvement project involving preparation of roadway plans for 12 streets. Responsible for survey reduction, design of curb and gutter replacement plans and profiles, and preparation of improvement plans. The project also required survey and detailed plan and profile preparation for curb and gutter replacement areas. An asphalt overlay was designed for each street based on field review of the existing pavement condition. One street was completely reconstructed.
• The City Drive Widening, City of Orange, CA – Mr. heath was the design engineer responsible for preparation of street improvement plans for the widening of the City Drive from the State Route 22 (SR 22) freeway to Chapman Avenue in conjunction with the development of The Block at Orange. Assisted the project manager during the design and preparation of street improvement plans and profiles, construction details, and design cross sections. Plans included typical sections, street improvement plans and profiles, construction details, drainage details, and design cross sections.

Mr. Steven W. Ledbetter, P.E.

Project Role
Project Engineer
Education
BS, Civil Engineering
(Environmental),
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
Registration
Registered Civil Engineer,
PE 84044 (CA)
Affiliations
Riverside-San Bernardino
Counties Branch, American
Society of Civil Engineers
Certifications
Certificate,
CAD Pilot Boot Camp
for AutoCAD Civil 3D
Certificate,
Caltrans 24 Hour Training
for Water Pollution
Control Managers
Mr. Ledbetter has over 17 years of professional experience in the civil engineering industry. He has handled various critical and challenging projects from planning through design and implementation; all while ensuring that projects are executed as per specification in the stipulated time with quality. He has a well-rounded background with experience in: preparation and analysis of street and utility improvement plans and specifications including potable and non-potable water, wastewater, and drainage; utility master planning including computer modeling, analysis, and report preparation; water supply planning including feasibility studies, urban water management plans, water supply assessments and verifications; storm water compliance reporting including water quality management plans and storm water pollution prevention plans and; and grant writing for various State and Federal agencies.

Related Experience
• CDBG Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Project, City of El Monte, CA – Mr.

Ledbetter was a project engineer for design of pavement rehabilitation of residential, local, collector and arterial streets throughout the City of El Monte. The project included more than 480,000 square feet of Asphalt-Rubber Cape Seal and 560,000 square feet of Type II Rubberized Emulsion Aggregate Slurry Seal. • CDBG Street Improvement Project, City of El Monte, CA – Mr. Ledbetter was a project engineer for design of CDBG funded pavement rehabilitation on Klingerman Street, Strozier Avenue and Fern Street for the City of El Monte. This project consists of the preparation of full Construction documents including plans, technical specifications, construction cost estimates (PS&E) and construction support services for the design of the pavement rehabilitation, curb, gutter, sidewalk, ADA curb ramps, and striping replacement.
• ATP Cycle 1 Safe Routes to Calimesa and Wildwood Elementary Schools, City of Yucaipa, CA – As Project Engineer, Mr. Ledbetter is providing design engineering services including preparation of full Construction documents including environmental compliance documents, right-of-way acquisition, plans, technical specifications, construction cost estimates (PS&E) and construction support services for the design of the Bicycle lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalk, crosswalks, ADA curb ramps, signing and striping along Avenue ‘H’ from 3rd Street to Holmes Street and along County Line Road between 3rd Street and California Street. • Safe Route to Schools Cycle 10 (SR2S), City of Coachella, CA – TKE is providing design, surveying, environmental compliance services, utility coordination, right-ofengineering, and construction assistance management for the design and construction of Class I and II Bicycle lanes, crosswalks, signs advanced stop/yield bars, ADA curb ramps, median islands, crossing islands and in-ground and overhead rapid flashing beacons across the City. Mr. Ledbetter served as Project Engineer for the project.

• 2
nd Street Safe Routes to School, City of Calimesa/Yucaipa, CA – As Project Engineer, Mr. Ledbetter assisted with the design and construction of SR2S funded pedestrian path of travel enhancements to provide safer walking paths along 2nd Street between Avenue “L” and Avenue “H” and along Avenue “L” between 2nd Street and 3
rd Street. The project included design and construction of proposed curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements for increased pedestrian safety. The project included approximately 1-mile of street improvements together with structural bridge widening over existing drainage channel, right-of-entry acquisition, public outreach and coordination, utility relocation and roundabout construction at the intersection of County Line Road and 2nd Street. Mr. Ledbetter was also responsible for grant management with the Caltrans Local Assistance, bidding services, permitting, construction administration and utility coordination. • County Line Road Interchange Improvements, City of Calimesa, CA – Mr. Ledbetter served as Project Engineer assisting with the development of conceptual designs, including review of the existing project study report, preparation of new ramp alternatives and preliminary geometric layouts. The project is attempting to fast track construction on roundabout ramp construction to increase capacity and functionality for the Cherry Valley Boulevard on/off-ramps. • Cherry Valley Interchange Improvements, City of Calimesa, CA – As Project Engineer, Mr. Ledbetter provided conceptual design services, including review of the existing project study report, preparation of new ramp alternatives and preliminary geometric layouts. The project is attempting to fast track construction on roundabout ramp construction to increase capacity and functionality for the Cherry Valley Boulevard on/off-ramps.
• Arrow Highway Street and Utility Improvements, City of Upland, CA – Mr.

Ledbetter was the Associate Engineer for this 9,100 linear feet of street reconstruction, including rock curb, sidewalks, and ADA access compliance; as well as 1,100 linear feet of 8” cement mortar lined and coated steel waterline and appurtenances, 330 linear feet of 12” vitrified clay pipe sewer with manhole reconstructions, and 615 linear feet of 66” to 24” reinforced concrete pipe storm drain improvements.
• Foothill Boulevard Street Improvements, City of Fontana, CA – This project involved re-design of 11,800 linear feet of street widening, including landscaped median improvements and bike lane extensions, and sewer and storm drain improvements.
• 11th Street Improvements, City of Upland, CA – Mr. Ledbetter provided civil design services for improvements to the water system, sewer, storm drain and street along 11th street in the City of Upland, between Monte Vista Avenue and Benson Avenue.

Upgrades included 5,000 linear feet of water system replacement and upsizing for existing under sized and aged water mains. To provide sewer service along the business corridor, 1,600 linear feet of 8” sewer was constructed. Hydrology and hydraulics analysis ensured the installation of 4,000 linear feet of 90” to 54” reinforced concrete pipe storm drains would provide adequate 100-year flood protection. Street improvements were provided to better serve and protect existing and proposed business developments, including lighting and signing and striping improvements.

Ms. Michelle Arellano, P.E.

Project Role
Quality Assurance/Quality
Control
Education
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
B.S. in Civil Engineering
Registration
Registered Civil Engineer,
State of California, No.
42012
Affiliations
American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE)
Ms. Arellano has over 22 years of experience as a civil engineer. She has worked on a variety of water system improvements, public works and land development engineering projects including street improvements, drainage improvements, and wastewater system improvements.

Related Experience
Street Improvements
Michelle Arellano has managed numerous street improvement projects including preparation of drawings, specifications, estimates, traffic control plans, hydrology and hydraulics reports, permit applications, environmental compliance documents and rightof-way acquisition documents for new streets and widening of existing and rehabilitation of existing street projects. In addition, she has provided construction administration for many of these same projects including supervising construction inspectors and providing other construction engineering support. Projects include construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, pavement, signage and striping, landscaping, grading, retaining walls, irrigation systems, and streetlights.

Project Management
Michelle Arellano managed the City of Upland Development Services Department for 8 years. She managed a staff of 8 engineers and technicians. She currently provides project management services to public agencies to assist with development of capital improvement project and processing of land development projects. She has considerable experience with managing other consultants and working with developers and their representatives, preparing documents for city councils and agency boards of directors and public bidding.

She has assembled conditions of approval and project requirements for both development and capital improvement projects.

Plan Checking
Michelle Arellano provides plan checking services for street improvement plans, traffic control plans, grading plans, water & sewer improvement plans, storm drain improvement plans, hydrology studies and hydraulic analyses, and erosion control plans. She is currently managing plan checking for a 400 acre development in the City of Upland.

Mr. Ron Musser, P.L.S.

Project Role
Senior Surveyor
Registration
Professional Land Surveyor,
LS 4230 (CA)
Affiliations
American Council of
Engineering Companies of
California
California Land Surveyors
Association
Mr. Musser has over 50 years of experience in performing field and office surveying services for public and private projects including roadway and highway projects. He has performed design topographic surveying and construction staking on all of TKE’s respective design and construction management projects over the past 10 years. He has prepared records of survey, parcel maps and tract maps in San Bernardino County, Riverside County, San Diego County, Orange County and Los Angeles County. He has performed boundary, topographic, ALTA, and precise level surveys as well as Global Positioning Surveys.

Related Experience
• Foothill Boulevard Median and Traffic Signal Improvements, City of Fontana, CA – Mr. Musser was the Project Surveyor for this 1,300 linear feet of median, traffic signal modification, and street widening improvements. Mr. Musser provided all topographic design surveying and construction staking for construction of the project between Sierra Avenue and Mango Avenue. Project components included construction of ultimate street widening, median, curb and gutter, sidewalk, traffic signals, striping, and onsite private improvements.
• San Bernardino Avenue Street Improvements, County of San Bernardino, CA – Mr.

Musser was the Project Surveyor for this 8,800 Linear feet of street median, sidewalk, and storm drain improvements. Mr. Musser provided all topographic design surveying and construction staking for construction of ultimate street widening improvements including median, curb and gutter, sidewalk, landscaping, traffic signal modification, striping, storm drain and sewer crossings and private onsite improvements. In addition, Mr. Musser prepared legals, plats and grant deeds for right-of-way acquisition on eight parcels.
• Foothill Boulevard Street Improvements, City of Fontana, CA – Mr. Musser was the Project Surveyor for this 11,800 linear feet of street widening, sewer and storm drain improvements, bike lane extension and median improvements. The project was separated into two phases from East Avenue to Cherry Avenue and from Cherry Avenue to Hemlock Avenue. Mr. Musser provided all topographic design surveying and construction staking for the construction of ultimate street widening, median, curb and gutter, sidewalk, traffic signals, storm drain, sewer, striping, and onsite private improvements. In addition, Mr. Musser prepared legals, plats and grant deeds for more than twenty right-of-way acquisitions.
• Arden Drive Street Improvements, City of El Monte, CA – The Arden Drive Water System, Sewer, and Street Improvements Project is located in the City of El Monte north of the Interstate 10 Freeway on Arden Drive between Valley Boulevard and the BNSF Railroad crossing. Proposed water system, sewer, and street improvements, including traffic signal installation and interconnect conduit were constructed with ARRA funding and schedule requirements. The project provided

water line upgrades and construction of additional sewer and street improvements to serve a proposed development for the new public works yard and Department of Motor Vehicles office. Supplemental ground design survey and design services, including preparation of plans, specifications and estimates were provided by TKE for approximately 1,600 linear feet of water, sewer and street improvements, traffic signal and interconnect wiring, and signing and striping improvements. • Foothill Vision: Street and Recycled Water Improvements, City of Upland, CA – The City of Upland developed a corridor master plan for Foothill Boulevard through the City. The master plan appointed vision for Foothill Boulevard dictated the ultimate street section with landscaped median, parkway and right-of-way. The Foothill Vision Project was the first reach of Foothill Boulevard to be improved within the City. The project included 2,800 linear feet of street and recycled water main design along Foothill Boulevard from Redding Way to 2nd Street. The vision project reconstructed Foothill Boulevard to eliminate the existing frontage road and provide a wider street section with large amounts of landscaping to beautify the corridor.

Conventional ground design survey, design and construction management services, including preparation of plans, specifications and estimates were provided by TKE for approximately 2,800 linear feet of street improvements, 1,600 linear feet of recycled water improvements, and signing and striping improvements. • Alessandro Boulevard Street Improvements, City of Riverside, CA – The Alessandro Boulevard Street Improvements Project is located in the Eastern Riverside Canyon Crest area between Chicago Avenue and Trautwein Road. The project improvements provided street widening, median improvements, storm drain and culvert crossing improvements, traffic signal construction and modifications, street lighting, undergrounding of existing power poles, and landscaping and irrigation for corridor beautification and improved traffic and pedestrian safety. Supplemental conventional ground survey and field reconnaissance was provided by TKE for approximately 11,900 linear feet of street widening and median improvements. TKE prepared legal descriptions, right-of-way acquisition plats, temporary construction easement plats, slope easement plats, and grant and easement deeds for 7 parcels.

This project resulted in changed conditions that reduced the contract amount by approximately 5%.

Ms. Monae Pugh
Project Role
Traffic Assistant
Education
UC Berkley Institute of
Transportation Engineers
Affiliations
Institute of Transportation
Engineers
Ms. Pugh has over 30 years of Municipal and Public Agency engineering experience with a wide range of responsibilities and projects emphasizing the discipline of Transportation and Traffic Engineering. Her most recent experience includes management of both Land Development and Traffic Engineering Departments for the City of Fontana. Prior experience includes over 16 years in the County of Riverside Traffic Engineering Department. Ms. Pugh has actively pursued continuing education throughout her career through U.C. Berkley extension courses offered by the Institute of Transportation Studies and couples this with functional engineering experience. She is a Certified Grant Writer through Cal State San Bernardino Certification Program and has secured multiple Transportation grants for a wide variety of infrastructure projects.

Related Experience
• Foothill Blvd. Street Improvements, City of Fontana, CA – Ms. Pugh worked with TKE Engineering to design and coordinate the traffic signal component of this project as part of the management team from the City of Fontana. She completed design of signals at Foothill Blvd. intersections of Cottonwood Ave., Redwood Ave., Hemlock Ave. as well as traffic signal modifications for Mulberry Ave. and Cherry Ave. All were delivered and constructed with the overall street widening project. • Slover Avenue and Live Oak Avenue, Traffic Signal Plan, City of Fontana, CA – Ms.

Pugh was the design engineer and project manager for this at-grade rail crossing project. Design included coordination with Union Pacific Railroad to install rail crossing gates and appurtenances including rail pre-emption and permitting within rail right of way.
• Van Buren Blvd, County of Riverside, CA – Ms. Pugh designed and managed this traffic signal improvement as part of an overall safety project to provide improved access to Woodcrest Christian School. Upon completion vehicle traffic was redirected to the campus via Dauchy Avenue. Coordination with the school to provide an additional access point and road improvements to this driveway were part of the overall project. Additionally, ingress and egress points were coordinated and designed to improve safety to private business access at this location. • City-Wide Speed Zone Certification, City of Fontana, CA – Ms. Pugh managed an in-house recertification program which developed all new speed zones within the City limits for City Council approval. The remodel consisted of bringing all zones into compliance with current State mandates, certification practices and procedures; ensuring consistency for local law enforcement with the County of San Bernardino through enforcement. The project consisted of over 125 speed zones. • Southwest Industrial Park Specific Plan (SWIP), City of Fontana, CA – Ms. Pugh reviewed the transportation component of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR)

document to amend this City of Fontana Specific Plan (SP) with boundary and land use changes. The circulation of the draft EIR included coordination with various Cities as well as the County of San Bernardino and the County of Riverside. • Traffic Investigations, County of Riverside and City of Fontana, CA – Ms. Pugh has extensive experience dealing with traffic safety issues and citizen concerns throughout these communities making recommendations and implementing change and improvement for mitigation. Experience includes preparation of all work orders for installation of traffic control devices.
• Permit Parking Zone Program, City of Fontana, CA – Ms. Pugh responded to traffic safety concerns on and around Fontana High School relative to student parking and pedestrian traffic. Numerous residential neighborhood and Fontana Unified School District (FUSD) complaints were received due to overabundance of student parking adjacent to the school. A comprehensive program was prepared, coordinated and implemented with Fontana police department, FUSD, residents to provide permit parking zones in the neighborhoods adjacent to the school. The program includes issuance of parking permits to residents, public outreach, safety measures, and City Council approval.
• Grant Awards; City of Fontana, CA – Ms. Pugh successfully applied for municipal grants from the following programs: Highway Safety Improvement Program and Safe Routes to School (both at Federal and State levels). Project awards included new raised medians for Sierra Ave., Foothill Blvd., and Citrus Ave. Additionally, traffic signal installation funding was secured for Alder Ave., at Wabash Ave. and also Randall Ave. at Palmetto Ave.
• Safe Route To Schools; City of Fontana, CA – Ms. Pugh successfully responded to traffic safety concerns at elementary schools with high pedestrian and vehicle volumes. Engineering & Traffic Study reports were performed to include support data for both Federal and State grant funding integral to mitigation, planning, and final design plans.
o Randall-Pepper Elementary School (State SRTS) grant award included flashing beacon improvements, in ground pavement lighting at crosswalk, signing/striping, sidewalk widening beyond City right-of-way. Coordination with Fontana Unified School District, crossing guard staff and parents. Before and After Survey conducted with school children and their families. o Adler Elementary School (Federal SR2S) grant award included a School Pedestrian Traffic Signal, crosswalk, implementing on street parking restrictions, and addition of turning lanes. Coordination with Fontana Unified School District, crossing guard staff and parents. Before and After Survey conducted with school children and their families.

3. SUBCONSULTANTS
We will retain Phil Martin & Associates, Inc.
(PMA) for environmental services, LOR
Geotechnical Group, Inc. (LOR) for geotechnical
investigation, JCA Engineering Inc. (JCA) for
electrical design, and Community Works Design
Group (CWDG) for landscape design.

Phil Martin & Associates, Inc. – Phil Martin
has been providing environmental consulting
services for compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) since 1978. Mr.

Martin provides environmental consulting
services to the private sector as well as public
agencies for a wide range of projects. The types
of environmental services provided include the
preparation of Initial Studies, Mitigated Negative
Declarations, Environmental Assessments (EA),
Program EIRs, Project EIRs, Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI), certified mailings,
public hearing presentations, etc. Phil Martin &
Associates also prepares the following support
documents for certification of CEQA and NEPA
documents: Mitigation Monitoring Programs;
Statement of Facts, Findings and Overriding
Considerations; and Resolutions.

PMA has experience working with the City to
prepare NEPA and CEQA documents for the
construction of the Calimesa Creek project.

LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc. – Supporting
TKE’s team for geotechnical engineering will be
LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc. LOR is a multidisciplinary geotechnical engineering and consulting firm providing high quality
geotechnical, geologic, environmental, and
construction inspection services since 1988. LOR
is a certified State of California Small Business.

LOR has a multi-disciplinary staff of qualified and
experienced licensed professionals who hold
registrations in the State of California. LOR’s
principals are directly involved in the
implementation and completion of its
professional services.

LOR has provided geotechnical, environmental
and geologic services to various Public Works and
Capitol Projects Departments, including the City
of Big Bear Lake, Canyon Lake, Indio, Garden
Grove, Hesperia, La Quinta, Moreno Valley,
Perris, Redlands, Riverside, San Bernardino, San
Jacinto, Temecula, Upland, Yorba Linda, Yucaipa,
and the Counties of Riverside and San
Bernardino.

LOR has experience working with the City to
prepare geotechnical services on the Calimesa
Creek project.

JCA Engineering, Inc. – JCA is dedicated to
provide efficiently innovative architectural
lighting design services, and state-of-the-art
electrical engineering. Projects successfully
completed within the last year represent total
construction values exceeding thirty million
dollars. Those projects encompassed new and
renovated educational facilities, efficient public
works facilities, religious facilities, active and
passive recreational sites, sports complexes,
arenas and streetscapes for community
revitalization. The principals of this growing
design firm offer more than 65 combined years
of experience in electrical systems engineering.

JCA implements new technology to evaluate our
design proposals using software such as AutoCAD
2016. Lighting design incorporates all required
Title 24 energy codes and we are capable of
providing all the required Title 24 forms to meet
all state requirements.

JCA offers comprehensive experience in
government, public works, federal, religious,
business, institutional, private and educational
facilities electrical system requirements and
construction. In addition, JCA provides design
expertise in fire alarm, electronic
communications, intrusion alarm and video
distribution systems.

JCA also has large amount of experience in
lighting design and distribution for streetscapes,
sports parks, median improvements, passive
parks, tract housing entries, and condominium
site lighting.

The firm is a certified small business firm and has
complete general liability, workman
compensation, automotive and errors/omissions
Insurance coverage.

Their goal is not limited to the design of the
projects only, but includes the incorporation of
value engineering and constructability review.

Through the examination of specific design
alternatives, they will identify the most cost
effective project alternative that meets design
requirements and will provide for the greatest
opportunity for expedited construction, which

allows them to consistently deliver projects that
use public resources in a very wise and
responsible manner.

Community Works Design Group – CWDG
draws from the knowledge of over thirty years of
broad, regional experience with a variety of
public and private projects including community
and regional parks, recreation facilities,
streetscape programs, planned community
developments, model homes, and commercial
and institutional developments. CWDG has the
experience and capabilities that will produce
creative and functional design solutions.

They have built a reputation on timely
completion of contractual obligations and their
ability to meet clients' needs and project
schedules. Their staff and resources are such
that they are able to meet the project schedules
established by the client.

4. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Terry Renner, P.E., Q.S.D.

Principal in Charge
City of Calimesa
Lori Askew
Public Works Director
TKE Engineering, Inc. Support Staff
Dennis Donahue, P.E., P.L.S., Q.S.D. – Senior Plan Check Engineer David Kinzle – Project Manager Gabor Pakozdi, P.E., Q.S.D. – Senior Plan Check Engineer Brian Wolfe, P.E. – Project Engineer Octavio Parada – Associate Engineer Jose Martinez – Associate Engineer Tom Engel – Associate Engineer Yesenia Diaz – Associate Engineer Kristine Macalma – Associate Engineer Marvin Lara – Associate Engineer Chance Renner – Assistant Engineer Brad Enscoe – Senior Public Works Inspector Patrick Palafox – Senior Public Works Inspector Stephen Biscotti – Senior Public Works Inspector Brett Enscoe – Survey Mycal Balta – Survey
Candice Velasco – Marketing Manager Michelle Sells – Accounting/Office Manager Carol Bennett – Clerical Tracey McLoughlin – Clerical
Cassondra Gutierrez – Clerical Deana Vilches – Clerical Ron Musser, P.L.S.

Senior Surveyor
Topographic Survey
Base Construction
Monae Pugh
Traffic Assistant
Trail Crossing
Improvements
Loop Placement
LOR Geotechnical
Group, Inc.

Geotechnical
Investigation
Community Works
Design Group
Landscape Design
Phil Martin &
Associates, Inc.

Environmental
Compliance
Michelle Arellano, P.E.

Quality Assurance/ Quality
Control
Plan Review
Michael Heath, P.E.

Project Manager
Michael Thornton, P.E., P.L.S.

City Engineer
Steven Ledbetter, P.E.

Project Engineer
Design
ADA Compliance
Cost Estimating
JCA
Engineering, Inc.

Electrical

SECTION D: QUALIFICATIONS AND

EXPERIENCE

1. TYPES OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
TKE provides turnkey consulting engineering
services to several municipalities throughout
Southern California. The following is a listing of
services provided by TKE:
a) Project Management
TKE provides effective project management
services to a variety of clients. We have
successfully delivered extensive and highly
visible street improvement, drainage
improvement, facility improvement and park
improvement projects in the Cities of Upland,
Fontana, Rialto, Hesperia, Redlands,
Highland, and Riverside. TKE’s approach has
consistently allowed our partner agencies to
fulfill their missions of delivering the best
value for the public’s investment. TKE’s
management approach includes:
1) Monthly Progress Reports – TKE
documents project progress for all
project assigned to TKE by a
comprehensive project management
summary. The summary includes
project name and related number,
description of progress, budget status,
schedule compliance, and anticipated
upcoming accomplishments.
2) Communication – Communications with
agencies’ staff and developers is
another important component to
effective project management. In
addition to the monthly progress
reports, TKE meets with clients and
developer as needed to ensure the
projects are proceeding as anticipated.

We document each discussion or
meeting with notes and electronically
mail them to the project team within
three days of the meeting/conference
indicating action items and a schedule
for completion of these items.
3) Record Keeping – TKE keeps records in
an organized filing system both in hard
copy and electronic forms. This
organized filing system allows TKE to
access records immediately should they
be needed.
4) Public Meetings – TKE meets with
project stakeholders as needed
including City Council, the public,
permitting agencies, utilities, etc. We
meet with them at the project’s onset
and throughout the course of project
development to ensure all stakeholder
project needs are considered in the
project design. All meeting preparation
(City Staff Reports, agendas, exhibits,
slide shows, etc.) will be prepared by
TKE for each meeting. Again, meetings
will be documented. TKE has provided
numerous similar presentations to
Councils (closed sessions, council
meetings, community meetings, etc.).
5) Team Meeting – Team meetings include
all City parties that have any interest in
the project development. In particular,
the City’s Community Development
Department will be a close working
partner with our Project Manager in
development project processing and
environmental compliance for capital
projects. TKE has already developed a
working partnership with other
members of the City’s planning staff
and will effectively works with him to
complete expediting project processing.
b) Civil Engineering
TKE’s Civil Engineering projects have
included:
1) Transportation Infrastructure Funding,
Planning, Design, Bidding, and
Construction
2) Drainage Infrastructure Funding,
Planning, Design, Bidding, and
Construction
3) Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure Funding,
Planning, Design, Bidding, and
Construction
4) Sewer and Water System Hydraulic
Analysis
5) Infrastructure Master Planning/Capital
Improvement Program (CIPs)
development, and management
6) Hydrologic Studies/Hydraulic Design
7) Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans
(SWPPP)

8) Sediment and Erosion Control Facilities
9) Hydromodification Studies / Water
Quality Management Plans (WQMPs)
c) Surveying / Mapping / Right-of-Way
Engineering
TKE provides Land Analysis services for many
projects:
1) Public Improvements (major or minor)
2) Land and Real Estate Developments
Our Surveying and Mapping experts provide
these services:
1) Construction Layout/Staking
2) Right-of-Way Engineering
3) Boundary Surveys
4) Construction Surveys
5) Design Surveys
6) Legal Description Surveys
7) Aerial Mapping
8) A.L.T.A. Surveys
9) Topographic Surveys
10)Control Surveys
11)Easement Surveys
d) Grant Writing / Funds Management
TKE’s Grant Writing/Funds Management
team enables our municipal and agency
partners of any size to find potential funding
sources and to prepare competitive funding
applications. Additionally, after funds are
awarded to a partner, TKE ensures
compliance with state and federal funding
requirements. In the past few years, TKE has
obtained tens of millions of dollars in funding
for our public works projects and
transportation improvements; including the
City’s SB1 LPP grant.

Our grant writing services are enhanced by
integration with engineering services to
facilitate and integrate project design. This
expedites project start up and completion
and ensures compliance with funding
requirements.

TKE has assisted clients secure funding from
the following programs:
1) Local Partnership Program (LPP)
2) Active Transportation Program (ATP)
3) Hazard Elimination Safety (HES)
4) Federal SRTS and State SR2S (Safe
Routes to Schools)
5) Federal Transportation Funding thru
Caltrans Local Assistance
6) State Proposition 1E and 84 Flood
Management Funding
7) Department of Transportation Highway
Safety Administration Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement
(CMAQ) Funding
8) US Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) Funding
9) California Department of Parks and
Recreation
10)South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD)
11)Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA)
e) Community Outreach / Public Relations
Depending on the City’s needs, TKE’s
strategies are designed to reach, inform and
involve constituents and stakeholders of
planning proposals, projects and programs.

If requested, we can provide opportunities for
interested parties to comments, enabling
actionable analysis of feedback received.

TKE’s outreach methods result in building
greater consensus and public buy-in.

Services include the design, planning and
execution of:
1) Marketing Campaigns
2) Public Information Meetings /
Groundbreaking Ceremonies

3) Project Branding
4) Project Website Design and
Construction
5) Project Collateral Materials (Brochures,
Presentation Boards, etc.)
6) Graphic Design
f) Quality Assurance/Quality Control
TKE takes pride in our reputation for
thoroughness, rapid turnaround, cost
efficiency and overall quality of work, and
believes that a high level of quality is needed
on all PS&E packages. High quality design
yields the following tangible results:
1) Ease of Oversight
2) Smoother Processing
3) Healthy Number of Bidders
4) Consistent Bids
5) Minimized Construction Support Cost
6) Absence of Design-Related Change
Orders
7) Reduced Claims and Dispute Resolution
Costs
TKE believes that the most successful quality
assurance program is one that is applied
inherently throughout the entire design
process and all design activities. This
program requires not only formal procedures
for checking, but encourages the
conscientious effort of experienced people to
always “create quality” in every task
performed throughout the design process.

This program has become a natural element
in all aspects of TKE’s design and
management activities, and will guide our
work on this contract:
1) Staff Training and Development
2) Assignment of Experienced Staff
3) Continuity of Staffing
4) Project-Specific Work Plan
5) Schedule Compliance
6) Comprehensive Field Review and
Compilation Of Site Data
7) Established Design Procedures
8) Established Detailing Standards
9) Established Checking Procedures,
Including Independent In-House QA /
QC Review
10)Dual (independent) Quantity Estimates
11)Review by Constructability Expert
This Quality Assurance / Quality Control
program is in place to ensure that PS&E
documents prepared by TKE continue to
exceed the standards of our clients and that
we will deliver the project on schedule and
within budget.
g) Resources
TKE’s project team is committed to providing
services as presented herein. In addition,
TKE maintains state of the art engineering
resources that ensure complete compatibility
with our clients resources including computer
software compatibility, filing protocol,
communications protocol, and survey data.

Our office location in Riverside is only
minutes from the City and will permit TKE
staff to respond to requested for meetings or
field inspections within at a moment’s notice.

TKE will respond to the City’s needs as they
arise. The City will be an important client
since, as a small firm, all of our clients is
given the utmost attention. TKE commitment
will ensure that all of the City’s needs are
met. We strongly encourage the City to
verify our performance history with our
references. Because of TKE proactive
management approach, TKE rarely
experiences ‘crisis’ project delivery needs.

When requested by our clients, TKE adds
resources, commits extended work hours,
develops an efficient implementation plan
and other efforts as needed.
h) Experience
TKE has extensive experience with an
excellent reputation in both the design of and
construction support of street improvement
projects. Throughout our history of eighteen
years serving Southern California, we have
provided design and construction support
services for numerous transportation,
landscape, and drainage facilities projects.

We have successfully completed complex and
challenging projects for a variety of municipal
agencies who have continued to request that

we partner with them in delivering projects to
their communities.

Our street and drainage improvement
projects have included the full services of civil
engineering design, including coordination
with landscape architects, geotechnical
engineers and other consultants necessary
for the completion of challenging projects.

As presented in the RFP, our project team has
extensive experience with not only street
improvement projects, but our approach in
managing successful grant funding
programs. TKE has successfully acquired
and/or managed $5.0 million under
Proposition 40 for a flood control and
groundwater recharge basin in the City of
Upland, $1.0 million under Proposition 84 for
a storm drain and basin improvements in the
City of Ontario, $0.75 million under
Proposition 84 for a flood control and
groundwater recharge basin in the City of
Yucaipa, $5.0 million under Proposition 1E for
a flood control and groundwater recharge
basin in the City of Redlands, $10 million
under Proposition 1E for a Flood Control and
Groundwater Recharge Basin in the City of
Fontana, and a $3.3 million grant from South
Coast Air Quality Management District under
AB 1318 Emissions Mitigation Fees Fund for a

1.0 megawatt solar facility in the City of
Desert Hot Springs.

Further, specifically with the City, TKE has
successfully acquired and/or currently
managing the following grants: a $0.45
million grant from US Department of
Transportation Highway Safety
Administration Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Grant Program
for preliminary engineering and
environmental documentation on the Cherry
Valley Interchange, a $1.4 million from the
US Department of Transportation Highway
Safety Administration SAFETEA-LU program
for preliminary engineering and right-of-way
acquisition for the County Line Road and
Calimesa Boulevard Roundabout at the west
end of the proposed project, and a $0.75
million grant from US Environmental
Protection Agency for the preliminary design
of storm drain and flood control facilities
within the western portion of the proposed
project.

Lastly, TKE has recently completed
management, on behalf of the City, of a $2.0
million grant from California Department of
Parks and Recreation for the design and
construction of the 4th Street Community
Park and a $0.90 million grant from the
Caltrans Safe Routes 2 School Program for
non-motorized transportation safety
improvements along Avenue L and 2nd Street.

We are sure that the successful results of our
past performance in the delivery of
transportation and drainage improvement
projects, along with our firm’s proven ability
to manage grant funded projects and utilize
our experience for a complete and well
engineered project, will provide a valuable
resource to the City.

2. PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE
The following projects performed by our team serve as a small sample of the success we have had with public agencies with projects similar to yours. We encourage you to confer with our references.

Calimesa Safe Route to Schools (SR2S)
City of Calimesa, CA
Client Contact
Ms. Lori Askew
City of Calimesa
(909) 795-9801
Project Cost
$1.5 Million
Completion Date
June 2016
Project Team
Terry Renner, P.E., Q.S.D.-
Project/Construction Manager
Michael P. Thornton, P.E.,
P.L.S. – Principal in Charge
Ron Musser, P.L.S.- Surveyor
Patrick Palafox – Public Works
Inspector
Stephen Biscotti – Public
Works Inspector
Description: The City of Calimesa was awarded funding for the pedestrian path of travel enhancements to provide increased safety for walking paths along 2nd Street between Avenue “L” and Avenue “H” and along Avenue “L” between 2nd Street and 3 rd Street. Proposed curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements will be constructed for increased pedestrian safety. The project includes 1 mile of street improvements together with structural bridge widening over existing drainage channel, water main relocation, right-of-entry acquisition, public outreach and coordination with regulatory agencies, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Caltrans Local Assistance.

Services: Services included funding administration through Caltrans Local Assistance, design, surveying, environmental compliance, utility relocation coordination, public outreach, permitting, right-of-entry acquisition documents, construction management, inspection, construction staking, and negotiation with property owners.

ATP Cycle 1 Safe Routes to Calimesa and Wildwood
Elementary Schools
City’s of Calimesa and Yucaipa, CA
Client Contact
Mr. Fermin Preciado, P.E.

City of Yucaipa
(909) 797-2489
Project Cost
$1.1 Million
Completion Date
April 2017
Project Team
Terry Renner, P.E., Q.S.D.-
Project/Construction Manager
Steven Ledbetter, P.E. –
Project Engineer
Michael P. Thornton, P.E.,
P.L.S. – Principal in Charge
Ron Musser, P.L.S.- Surveyor
Description: TKE is providing design engineering services for the Active Transportation Program, Cycle 1 Safe Routes to Calimesa and Wildwood Elementary Schools project for the City’s of Yucaipa and Calimesa. This project consists of the preparation of full Construction documents including environmental compliance documents, right-of-way acquisition, plans, technical specifications, construction cost estimates (PS&E) and construction support services for the design of the Bicycle lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalk, crosswalks, ADA curb ramps, signing and striping along Avenue ‘H’ from 3rd Street to Holmes Street and along County Line Road between 3rd Street and California Street.

Services: Services include design, surveying, funding management through Caltrans, PES preparation, environmental compliance services, utility coordination, right-ofway engineering, and construction assistance.

San Bernardino Avenue Median and Traffic Signal
Improvements
City of Fontana, CA
Client Contact
Mr. Chuck Hays
City of Fontana
(909) 350-6530
Project Cost
$0.3 Million
Completion Date
August 2012
Project Team
Terry Renner, P.E., Q.S.D. –
Project Manager
Michael P. Thornton, P.E.,
P.L.S. – Principal in Charge
Ron Musser, P.L.S. – Surveyor
Description: The San Bernardino Avenue median and traffic signal improvements project is located in the City of Fontana north of Interstate 10 Freeway and East of the Interstate 15 Freeway from Commerce Drive to Cypress Avenue. Proposed median and traffic signal improvements were constructed to provide a centralized turning procedure for the Walmart Distribution facility with nearly 1,000 turning movements per day. The project provides for increased vehicular capacity, corridor beautification, and improved traffic and pedestrian safety. Design, construction management, inspection and construction staking is being provided by TKE for the project. TKE provided utility and railroad coordination for the relocation and adjustment of various utility improvements (i.e., power poles, meters, vaults, etc.).

Services: Services included design, surveying, utility and railroad coordination, construction management, inspection and construction staking.

San Bernardino Avenue Street, Traffic Signal, Sewer
and Drainage Improvements
County of San Bernardino, CA
Client Contact
Mr. Brendon Biggs
County of San Bernardino
(909) 387-8040
Project Cost
$4.1 Million
Completion Date
November 2009
Project Team
Terry Renner, P.E., Q.S.D. –
Project Manager
Michael P. Thornton, P.E.,
P.L.S. – Principal in Charge
Ron Musser, P.L.S. – Surveyor
Description: The San Bernardino Avenue street, sewer and storm drain improvements project is located in the City of Fontana north of Interstate 10 Freeway and East of the Interstate 15 Freeway from Commerce Drive to Cypress Avenue. Proposed median and sidewalk improvements minimize turning movements providing for increased vehicular capacity, corridor beautification, and improved traffic and pedestrian safety. The project included 2 ½ miles of sewer improvements together with diversion structures, sewer siphons and laterals.

Drainage facilities included numerous storm drain crossings and channel extension.

Services: Services included design, hydrology and hydraulic modeling, report preparation, surveying, environmental compliance services, utility and railroad coordination, railroad crossing upgrade, right-of-way acquisition documents, and negotiation with property owners.

Foothill Boulevard Median and Traffic Signal
Improvements
City of Fontana, CA
Client Contact
Mr. Noel Castillo
City of Fontana
(909) 350-7632
Project Cost
$0.4 Million
Completion Date
April 2014
Project Team
Terry Renner, P.E., Q.S.D. –
Project Manager
Michael P. Thornton, P.E.,
P.L.S. – Principal in Charge
Ron Musser, P.L.S. – Surveyor
Description: The Foothill Boulevard median and traffic signal improvements project is located in the City of Fontana north of Interstate 10 Freeway and South of the Interstate 210 Freeway between Sierra Avenue and Mango Avenue. The project included 1,300 linear feet of median, traffic signal modification, and street widening improvements. Project components included construction of ultimate street widening, median, curb and gutter, sidewalk, traffic signal modification, median landscaping and lighting, striping, and onsite private improvements. The project was a federally funded project (HSIP) which was administered through Caltrans Local Assistance.

Services: Services included design, surveying, utility coordination, and construction staking.

Foothill Boulevard Widening, Median and Traffic
Signal Improvements, Phase II
City of Fontana, CA
Client Contact
Mr. Chuck Hayes
City of Fontana
(909) 350-6530
Project Cost
$0.8 Million
Completion Date
December 2015
Project Team
Terry Renner, P.E., Q.S.D. –
Project Manager
Michael P. Thornton, P.E.,
P.L.S. – Principal in Charge
Ron Musser, P.L.S. – Surveyor
Description: The Foothill Boulevard widening, median and traffic signal improvements project is located in the City of Fontana north of Interstate 10 Freeway and South of the Interstate 210 Freeway between Oleander Avenue and Juniper Avenue. The project included 1,900 linear feet of median, traffic signal modification, street widening, and storm drain improvements. Project components included construction of ultimate street widening, median, curb and gutter, sidewalk, traffic signal installation, ultimate storm drain and catch basins with connection to existing downstream drain, utility relocations, median landscaping and lighting, striping, and onsite private improvements. Right-of-way documents were prepared for right-of-way acquisition on two separate parcels, including a full take. The project was a federally funded project (HSIP) which was administered through Caltrans Local Assistance.

Services: Services included design, surveying, traffic analysis, environmental documents, right-of-way document preparation, and utility relocation coordination.

Foothill Boulevard Street Improvements
City of Fontana, CA
Client Contact
Mr. Chuck Hays
City of Fontana
(909) 350-6530
Project Cost
$8.8 Million
Completion Date
December 2007
Project Team
Terry Renner, P.E., Q.S.D. –
Project Manager
Michael P. Thornton, P.E., P.L.S.
– Principal in Charge
Ron Musser, P.L.S. – Surveyor
Description: The Foothill Boulevard street, sewer and storm drain improvements project is located in the City of Fontana north of Interstate 10 Freeway and East of the Interstate 15 Freeway from Ilex Avenue to Redwood Avenue. Proposed street widening and sidewalk improvements provided for increased vehicular capacity, corridor beautification, bike lane extension and improved traffic and pedestrian safety. Conventional ground survey and construction staking was provided by TKE for approximately 11,800 linear feet of street widening, bus turnouts, sewer and storm drain improvements, bike lane extension and median improvements. TKE prepared all legal descriptions, right-of-way acquisition plats, temporary construction easement plats and grant and easement deeds for 33 separate parcels.

Services: Services include conventional ground design surveying, right-of-way documentation preparation, temporary construction easement preparation, street, sewer, storm drain and on-site improvement plans, specifications and estimates, bidding assistance, construction staking and as-built verification.

Safe Route to Schools Cycle 10 (SR2S)
City of Coachella, CA
Client Contact
Mr. Jonathan Hoy, P.E.

City of Coachella
(760) 398-3502
Project Cost
$500 Thousand
Completion Date
August 2016
Project Team
Terry Renner, P.E., Q.S.D. –
Project Manager
Michael P. Thornton, P.E., P.L.S.
– Principal in Charge
Ron Musser, P.L.S. – Surveyor
Monae Pugh – Traffic
Engineering
Description: TKE is providing design engineering services for the Cycle 10 Safe Routes to Schools project for the City of Coachella. This project consists of the preparation of full Construction documents including plans, technical specifications, construction cost estimates (PS&E) and construction support services for the design of the Class I and II Bicycle lanes, crosswalks, signs advanced stop/yield bars, ADA curb ramps, median islands, crossing islands and in-ground and overhead rapid flashing beacons.

Services: Services include design, surveying, environmental compliance services, utility coordination, right-of-engineering, and construction assistance management.

3. REFERENCES
Please see the Table below for a small, but representative list of references who we continue to provide similar services. We respectfully request that you verify our qualifications with the listed references.

AGENCY CONTACT NAME PHONE NUMBER

DATES SERVICES

PROVIDED
(FROM/THROUGH)

CITY OF CALIMESA
908 PARK AVENUE
CALIMESA, CA 92320
MS. BONNIE JOHNSON
CITY MANAGER (909) 795-9801 2012 – PRESENT

CITY OF HIGHLAND
27215 BASELINE
HIGHLAND, CA 92346
MR. CARLOS ZAMANO

ASSISTANT PUBLIC WORKS

DIRECTOR
(909) 864-8732 2013 – PRESENT

CITY OF FONTANA
16489 ORANGE WAY
FONTANA, CA 92335
MR. RICHARD OAXACA
SENIOR ENGINEER (909) 350-7661 2000 – PRESENT

CITY OF FONTANA
16489 ORANGE WAY
FONTANA, CA 92335
MR. CHUCK HAYS
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS (909) 350-6530 2002 – PRESENT

CITY OF UPLAND
1370 N. BENSON AVENUE
UPLAND, CA 91786
MS. ROSEMARY HOERNING
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS (909) 291-2931 2000 – PRESENT

CITY OF YUCAIPA
34272 YUCAIPA BLVD.

YUCAIPA, CA 92399
MR. FERMIN PRECIADIO
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS (909) 797-2489 2012 – PRESENT

CITY OF COACHELLA
1515 SIXTH STREET
COACHELLA, CA 92236
MR. JONATHAN HOY
CITY ENGINEER (760) 501-8100 2000 – PRESENT

CITY OF HESPERIA
9700 SEVENTH AVENUE
HESPERIA, CA 92345
MR. MICHAEL BLAY

DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT

SERVICES
(760) 947-1901 2016 – PRESENT

SECTION E: COST PROPOSAL

SUBJECT: COUNTY LINE ROAD (CLR) TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
AWARD
MEETING DATE: February 7, 2022
PREPARED BY: Bonnie Johnson, City Manager
Michael Thornton, City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Award a contract to Roadway Engineering and Construction Corporation in the amount of $8,185,689.00 for construction of roadway and drainage improvements along County Line Road between Park Avenue and Bryant Street; and

2. Authorize 10% construction contingencies in the amount of $818,569.00 for project change orders; and

3. Approve the Plans and Specifications for construction of roadway and drainage improvements along County Line Road between Park Avenue and Bryant Street; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to execute minor change orders not exceeding the authorized construction contingencies; and

5. Authorize a construction management, geotechnical engineering, and survey budget of $880,000.

BACKGROUND: The Cities of Calimesa and Yucaipa are collaborating on construction of roadway and drainage improvements along County Line Road (CLR) between Park Avenue and Bryant Street. Since the proposed improvements are located in both cities, the cities have executed two fair share agreements that identified funding obligations of both cities. On March 5, 2018, and November 2, 2020, Council approved the respective agreements.

As noted above, on March 5, 2018, the City Council approved the Fair Share Agreement with the City of Yucaipa for County Line Road Corridor Improvements from Calimesa Boulevard to Bryant Street (2018 Agreement). Yucaipa had secured 2 grants: namely an Active Transportation Program (ATP) grant in the amount of $872,000, and a Mobile Source Reduction Committee (MSRC) grant in the amount of 380,000. Both are currently being used for improvements on County Line Road.

The 2018 Agreement includes grant match obligations for both cities. Yucaipa serves as the lead agency for ATP and MSRC funded improvements.

In addition, in January of 2018, Calimesa and Yucaipa partnered on a grant application for SB 1 Local Partnership Program (LPP) funding in the amount of $3,747,000. This grant was not only

STAFF REPORT FROM FEBRUARY 7, 2022 CITY COUNCIL

MEETING WITH ATTACHMENTS
targeting other areas on County Line Road not covered by the ATP and MSRC grants, but also overlapped with the 2018 Agreement for improvements not covered by ATP and MSRC; namely the multiple roundabouts (intersection improvements) planned for County Line Road. The cities were awarded this grant in the May of 2018. Funds were allocated by the CTC to the cities on March 25, 2021. The cities have 12 months after the date of allocation to award a contract. After award of the contract, the cities have up to 36 months to complete the construction. The grant amounts are shared between the two cities – see the Fiscal Impact section below.

After preparation of the contract documents, the City estimated the construction cost of the project at $7.5 million and City issued a notice of inviting bids. On August 24, 2021, the City received two bids for project construction. The amounts received far exceeded the construction budget – bids received totaled $10,678,626.59 and $11,704,225.50. The higher-than-expected bids are attributable to higher costs than expected for many items – in particular, the costs of Portland Cement Concrete (roundabouts islands, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, etc.), asphalt concrete pavement, catch basin filters, lighting, South Mesa Water Company’s (SMWC) water system modifications, and landscaping (tree replacement). Staff pursued other possible funding sources including through Riverside County Transportation Commission to fill the funding shortfall without success. Therefore, staff recommended that Council reject all bids, permit staff to rescope the project to reduce costs, rebid the project, and bring a recommendation of award back to City Council for consideration. The City of Yucaipa supported the recommendation. Council accepted Staff’s recommendation and rejected the bids on October 18, 2021.

Staff subsequently rescoped the project. The primary changes included, but were not limited to, pavement section redesign to utilize the existing asphalt to be removed for aggregate base, deleting landscaping including tree replacement, deleting roundabout monumentation and signage, and deleting lighted crosswalks. In addition, SMWC water facilities were rescoped and presented in a separate bid schedule to facilitate removal from this project if SMWC ultimately performs the work as part of their larger water line replacement project.

On January 19, 2022, the cities received the following bids:

Bidder Total Amount
Roadway Engineering and Construction Corp. $ 8,185,689.00 Hillcrest Contracting $ 8,249,756.73
All American Asphalt $ 9,644,214.91
Christensen Brothers General Engineering, Inc. $10,921,571.50 Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. $13,194,339.85
Bid details are shown on Attachment A. Roadway Engineering and Construction Corp. (Roadway) bid is the lowest responsive bid and staff recommends award to Roadway.

Staff is working with the City of Yucaipa to amend the November 2, 2020, Fair Share agreement to incorporate the final funding obligations of each City as discussed below and shown in Attachment A. Staff anticipates this amendment to be on the February 22nd Council meeting for approval.

FISCAL IMPACT: Calimesa’s estimated total fiscal impact from the 2018 Agreement (as amended by the November 2020 agreement) is $596,000. Calimesa’s portion of the 2018 Agreement is being funded by SB 1 RMRA (Road Maintenance and Repair Act) annual allocations over five years. The LPP project is an estimated total cost of $13,569,366. The LPP grant, for construction only, is in the amount of $3,747,000. The remaining cost of $9,822,366 is the local match requirement. Calimesa’s local match for the LPP agreement is estimated to be $2,581,027; while Yucaipa’s local match is estimated to be $7,241,339. Calimesa’s fair share will be funded by a combination of Development Impact fees (DIF), RMRA, MSRC Grant and contributions from developers. Staff does not anticipate having to reallocate any of the funding previously committed to the Citywide paving project.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A: Bid Summary

Bid Schedule A
1 MOBILIZATION/ DEMOBILIZATION 1 LS 180,000 180,000
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SAFETY 1 LS 100,000 100,000
3 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE AND NPDES REQUIREMENTS 1 LS 100,000 100,000 4 SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING AC BERM OR DIKE AS REQUIRED 5,214 LF 5 26,070 5 SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING PCC CURB AND/OR GUTTER AS REQUIRED 1,552 LF 6.25 9,700 6 SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING AC/PCC SIDEWALK/RAMP OR PCC SLAB OR AC/PCC DRIVE APPROACH AND/OR DRIVEWAY ACCESS OR PCC CROSS GUTTER AND/OR SPANDREL OR REMOVE EXISTING 24" PCC

PARKDRAIN AS REQUIRED
52,062 SF 1.00 52,062
7 PULVERIZE EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SHOWN 255,653 SF 0.70 178,957.10 8 COLD PLANE EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1.5" DEEP MINIMUM, LIMITS PER PLAN OR CONSTRUCT 10' HEADER CUT OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS (1.5" MIN. THICKNESS) ALONG EXISTING ASPHALT

CONCRETE PAVEMENT JOINTS
80,932 SF 0.25 20,233
9 REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN LINK, WOOD, OR WROUGHT IRON FENCING, INCLUDING GATES (REMOVAL ONLY) 3,380 LF 8.70 29,406
10 REMOVE EXISTING TREE OR PALM TREE (FROM 6” TO 24" DIAM.) 52 EA 2,760 143,520 11 REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING MAILBOX. DURING CONSTRUCTION USE 5 GALON BUCKET BASE WITH COMPACTED EARTH. SEE STREET IMPROVEMENT SHEET FOR NEW LOCATION 70 EA 450 31,500 12 REMOVE EXISTING SIGN AND RELOCATE AS REQUIRED PER TRAFFIC SIGNING AND STRIPING SHEETS (REMOVAL ONLY) 32 EA 40 1,280
13 REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS AND REPLACE IN-KIND TO LIKE CONDITIONS OR BETTER 17,600 SF 6.70 117,920 14 REMOVE EXISTING ROAD GUARD RAIL WITH 4”x8” WOOD SUPPORTS 42 LF 67 2,814 15 ADJUST EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE OR CLEAN OUT TO GRADE 15 EA 1,970 29,550 16 REMOVE, SALVAGE AND RELOCATE EXISTING PCC CAR STOP 8 EA 45 360 17 REMOVE EXISTING CMU BLOCK WALL PER PLAN (H=5' MAX.-REMOVAL ONLY) 139 LF 65 9,035 18 REMOVE EXISTING PCC OR CMU RETAINING BLOCK WALL (H=3' MAX.-REMOVAL ONLY) 381 LF 65 24,765 19 REMOVE EXISTING MASONRY OR CMU BLOCK PILASTER AND REPLACE IN KIND TO LIKE CONDITIONS OR BETTER 5 EA 1,250 6,250
20 REMOVE EXISTING REAL STATE BUSINESS SIGN AND REPLACE IN KIND TO LIKE CONDITIONS OR BETTER.

RELOCATE BEHIND BACK OF WALK 1 EA 3,500 3,500
21 ADJUST EXISTING WATER/GAS VALVE TO GRADE 67 EA 200 13,400 22 REMOVE EXISTING SIGN, SALVAGE AND PROVIDE TO THE CITY FO FUTURE USE 47 EA 25 1,175 23 REMOVE EXISTING STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE AND CONNECTING PIPING AS NEEDED PER STORM DRAIN PLANS 14 EA 2,770 38,780
24 REMOVE EXISTING GROUTED RIP-RAP AS NEEDED TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSED STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 1,990 SF 12 23,880
25 REMOVE EXISTING FLOOR DRAIN, INCLUDING PCC CURB AND REPLACE PER STORM DRAIN SHEETS 1 EA 1,500 1,500 26 REMOVE EXISTING FLAG POLE AND RELOCATE PER STREET IMPROVEMENT SHEETS 1 EA 4,000 4,000 27 REMOVE TOP PORTION OF EXISTING PCC HEADWALL BY SAW CUTTING HORIZONTALLY AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLY FROM TOP OF 2-60" RCP PIPES 1 EA 1,500 1,500
28 REMOVE EXISTING 3" STEEL POST. INCLUDING FOOTING 1 EA 500 500 29 REMOVE EXISTING TREE STUMP AS NEEDED TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 2 EA 600 1,200 30 REMOVE EXISTING DRAINAGE INLET AND CONSTRUCT CORRUGATED STEEL CAP, COAT WELDED, CUT AND ABRADED SURFACES AS SPECIFIED IN SSPCC 210-3.5 3 EA 0 0 31 REMOVE AND RELOCATE BEHIND BACK OF WALK EXISTING CATHODIC BOX OR AV/AR VAULT PER DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES STANDARD. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE RELOCATIONS AND/OR

ADJUSTMENTS WITH DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
2 EA 4,500 9,000
32 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE TO GRADE PER DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES STANDARDS 1 EA 2,800 2,800 33 REMOVE, SALVAGE AND RELOCATE EXISTING BUSINESS SIGN (TIRE SHOP). SEE STREET IMPROVEMENT SHEETS FOR NEW LOCATION 1 EA 3,500 3,500
34 ADJUST EXISTING ELECTRIC/TELEPHONE OR CABLE TV BOX TO GRADE 3 EA 250 750 35 ADJUST EXISTING ELECTRIC/TELEPHONE OR CABLE TV RISER TO GRADE 2 EA 250 500 36 CONSTRUCT 8" PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STANDARD 120-1 OR CONSTRUCT TYPE A-8 PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD NO.201 3,536 LF 40 141,440 37 CONSTRUCT 6" PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STANDARD 120-1 OR CONSTRUCT TYPE A-6 PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD NO.200 2,007 LF 40 80,280 38 CONSTRUCT 6" TYPE "A1" PCC CURB PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A87A 2,552 LF 35 89,320 39 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC CURB PER DETAIL "F", SEE SHEET 5 792 LF 35 27,720 40 CONSTRUCT 8" ASPHALT CONCRETE DIKE PER SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY STD. DWG. 117 OR CONSTRUCT 8" ASPHALT CONCRETE DIKE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD NO. 212 684 LF 10 6,840 41 CONSTRUCT CROSS GUTTER/SPANDREL PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD NO. 209 OR CONSTRUCT CROSS GUTTER/SPANDREL PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STANDARD DWG. 122-1 3,398 SF 9 30,582 42 CONSTRUCT ASPHALT CONCRETE DIKE PER APWA STANDARD PLAN 120-2 WITH ADA RAMP TRANSITION TO JOIN EXISTING PAVEMENT AND/OR EXISTING GROUND 420 SF 5 2,100 43 CONSTRUCT TYPE "A" OR "B" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STANDARD 115-1, WIDTH AS NOTED OR CONSTRUCT PCC SIDEWALK PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD NO. 401, WIDTH AS NOTED 56,987 SF 5 284,935 44 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC CONCRETE WALK-PAD AND/OR STEPS AS NEEDED, WIDTH TO MATCH EXISTING AND LENGTH AS NOTED 270 SF 8 2,160
45 CONSTRUCT RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STANDARD DWG. 109-2 AND PER APWA STANDARD PLAN 110-2, TYPE A, REVISE LAYOUT PER DETAIL "A" OR CONSTRUCT RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD NO. 213, REVISE LAYOUT PER DRIVEWAY DETAIL "B", SEE SHEET 5 18,902 SF 7 132,314
46 CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STANDARD DWG. 110-1 AND PER APWA STANDARD PLAN 110-2, TYPE C, REVISE LAYOUT PER DETAIL "D", SEE SHEET 5 OR CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD NO. 207A 6,139 SF 8 49,112
47 CONSTRUCT RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STANDARD DWG. 109-2 AND PER APWA STANDARD PLAN 110-2, TYPE A, REVISE LAYOUT PER DETAIL "A", SEE SHEET 5. MODIFIED WITH 8" THICK

CONCRETE FOR COMMERCIAL USE OR CONSTRUCT RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD NO. 213, REVISE LAYOUT PER DRIVEWAY DETAIL "B", SEE SHEET 5. MODIFIED WITH 8" THICK

CONCRETE FOR COMMERCIAL USE
2,704 SF 9 24,336
48 CONSTRUCT 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER 95% COMPACTED NATIVE, INSTALL 2"X4" REDWOOD

HEADERS FOR EDGE SUPPORT OR CONSTRUCT ASPHALT CONCRETE RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD NO. 206
10,583 SF 2.30 24,340.90
49 CONSTRUCT 12" OF 95% COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL DRIVEWAY ACCESS 1,589 SF 1 1,589 UNIT
City of Calimesa and Yucaipa
County Line Road Transportation Corridor Improvement Project Bid Breakdown
Wednesday, January 19, 2022
ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS QTY
Roadway Engineering &
Construction Corp.

UNIT COST TOTAL

Bid Schedule A
ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS QTY UNIT
Roadway Engineering &
Construction Corp.

UNIT COST TOTAL
50 CONSTRUCT CASE "A" CURB RAMP PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A88A AND AS NOTED (SEE SHEET 6 FOR GRADING DETAIL) OR CONSTRUCT CASE "A" CURB RAMP PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY STD. NO. 403 AND AS NOTED (SEE SHEET 6 GRADING DETAIL) OR CONSTRUCT BIKE RAMP PER NOTES ON CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A88A, NCHRP 672 EXHIBIT 6-67 AND PER DETAIL "G", SEE SHEET 5 26,081 SF 10 260,810
51 CONSTRUCT 4” TYPE A ISLAND PASSAGEWAY PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A88B, AND PER ROUNDABOUT GRADING DETAIL SHEET 1,600 SF 10 16,000
52 CONSTRUCT CHAIN-LINK FENCE IN-KIND TO LIKE CONDITIONS OR BETTER 1,262 LF 50 63,100 53 CONSTRUCT 4 TO 5-FT WIDE SINGLE SWING WALKWAY CHAIN-LINK GATE IN-KIND TO LIKE CONDITIONS OR BETTER 4 AE 1,250 5,000
54 CONSTRUCT 12 TO 14-FT WIDE DOUBLE SWING DRIVEWAY CHAIN-LINK GATE IN-KIND TO LIKE CONDITIONS OR BETTER 2 EA 3,000 6,000
55 CONSTRUCT 16 TO 20-FT WIDE ROLLIMG DRIVEWAY CHAIN-LINK GATE IN-KIND TO LIKE CONDITIONS OR BETTER 2 EA 3,200 6,400
56 CONSTRUCT WOODEN FENCE IN-KIND TO LIKE CONDITIONS OR BETTER 885 LF 150 132,750 57 CONSTRUCT 4 TO 5-FT WIDE SINGLE SWING WALKWAY WOODEN GATE IN-KIND TO LIKE CONDITIONS OR BETTER 2 EA 900 1,800
58 CONSTRUCT WROUGHT IRON FENCE IN-KIND TO LIKE CONDITIONS OR BETTER 82 LF 150 12,300 59 CONSTRUCT 4 TO 5-FT WIDE SINGLE SWING WALKWAY WROUGHT IRON GATE IN-KIND TO LIKE CONDITIONS OR BETTER 1 EA 2,000 2,000
60 CONSTRUCT 12 TO 14-FT WIDE DOUBLE SWING DRIVEWAY WROUGHT IRON GATE IN-KIND TO LIKE CONDITIONS OR BETTER 1 EA 6,500 6,500
61 CONSTRUCT 3' HIGH DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON FENCE BEHIND CURB AS SHOWN 1,048 LF 200 209,600 62 CONSTRUCT 1.5" MINIMUM OF ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY OVER 3" OF ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 250,549 SF 3 751,647 63 CONSTRUCT 4.5" THICK AGGREGATE BASE (PULVERIZED MATERIAL). 250,549 SF 1 250,549 64 CONSTRUCT 1.5" THICK MINIMUM DENSE GRADED ASPHALT CONCRETE (DGAC) OVERLAY TYPE C PG 64-10 OR CONSTRUCT 10' HEADER CUT OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS (1.5" MIN. THICKNESS) ALONG EXISTING

ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT JOINTS
80,932 SF 1.25 101,165
65 CONSTRUCT 4" OF PCC STAMPED CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER 12” COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL 4,512 SF 15 67,680 66 CONSTRUCT 8" OF PCC CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER 12" COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL 7,692 SF 9 69,228 67 CONSTRUCT 4" OF PCC CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER 12” COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL 10,705 SF 5 53,525 68 CONSTRUCT 24" WIDE PCC CURB OUTLET STRUCTURE PER SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY STD. DWG. 210 OR CONSTRUCT 48” UNDER SIDEWALK DRAIN PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY STD. DWG. 309 2 EA 5,000 10,000 69 CONSTRUCT 4" RESIDENTIAL CURB DRAIN PER DETAIL "E" CASE "A" OR CONSTRUCT 4" RESIDENTIAL CURB DRAIN PER DETAIL "E" CASE "B", SEE SHEET 5 21 EA 800 16,800 70 CONSTRUCT 2-2" SCH. 40 PVC SLEEVES FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 1,584 LF 38 60,192 71 CONSTRUCT REINFORCED CONCRETE BLOCK WALL PER APWA STANDARD PLAN 601-4, TYPE 3 AND AS NOTED 79 LF 150 11,850
72 CONSTRUCT SPLIT FACE MASONRY RETAINING WALL PER APWA STANDARD PLAN 618-3, TYPE B AND AS NOTED 80 LF 160 12,800
73 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE BLOCK SLOUGH WALL PER APWA STANDARD PLAN 622-4 AND AS NOTED 190 LF 150 28,500 74 INSTALL 2 SACK SLURRY BACKFILL OVER EXISTING 48" STORM DRAIN PIPE PER DETAIL "C", SEE SHEET 5 7 EA 3,540 24,780 75 CONSTRUCT 60" RCP STORM DRAIN PIPE, BACKFILL TRENCH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. DWG. 106-3 82 LF 780 63,960 76 CONSTRUCT 8 GAUGE 48" CMP STORM DRAIN PIPE WITH 2-2/3"X1/2" CORRUGATIONS. BACKFILL TRENCH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. DWG. 106-3 378 LF 455 171,990
77 CONSTRUCT 8 GAUGE 57"X38" ARCH CMP STORM DRAIN PIPE WITH 2-2/3"X1/2" CORRUGATIONS.

BACKFILL TRENCH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. DWG. 106-3 318 LF 680 216,240 78 CONSTRUCT 8 GAUGE 17"X13" ARCH CMP STORM DRAIN PIPE WITH 2-2/3"X1/2" CORRUGATIONS.

BACKFILL TRENCH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. DWG. 106-3 172 LF 303 52,116 79 CONSTRUCT 36" RCP STORM DRAIN PIPE, BACKFILL TRENCH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. DWG. 106-3 17 LF 440 7,480 80 CONSTRUCT 24" RCP STORM DRAIN PIPE, BACKFILL TRENCH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. DWG. 106-3 235 LF 146 34,310 81 CONSTRUCT 8 GAUGE 24" CMP STORM DRAIN PIPE WITH 2-2/3"X1/2" CORRUGATIONS. BACKFILL TRENCH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. DWG. 106-3 112 LF 340 38,080
82 CONSTRUCT 18" RCP STORM DRAIN PIPE, BACKFILL TRENCH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. DWG. 106-3 38 LF 135 5,130 83 CONSTRUCT 8 GAUGE 18" CMP STORM DRAIN PIPE WITH 2-2/3"X1/2" CORRUGATIONS. BACKFILL TRENCH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. DWG. 106-3 182 LF 293 53,326
84 CONSTRUCT 48" TO 57"X38" CMP STORM DRAIN PIPE TRANSITION. COAT WELDED, CUT AND ABRADED SURFACES AS SPECIFIED IN SSPWC 210-3.5 4 EA 2,700 10,800 85 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE PIPE-TO-PIPE (LARGE SIDE INLET) PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARD PLAN NO. 321-2 7 EA 10,000 70,000 86 CONSTRUCT 60" CONCRETE COLLAR PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARD PLAN NO. 380-4 2 EA 11,400 22,800
87 CONSTRUCT 24" OR 18" CONCRETE COLLAR PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARD PLAN NO. 380-4 3 EA 3,300 9,900
88 CONSTRUCT 25' CURB OPENING CATCH BASIN AND LOCAL DEPRESSION PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARD PLAN NO.300-3 AND 313-3 CASE E 2 EA 25,700 51,400 89 CONSTRUCT 24' CURB OPENING CATCH BASIN AND LOCAL DEPRESSION PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARD PLAN NO.300-3 AND 313-3 CASE E 1 EA 25,300 25,300 90 CONSTRUCT 21' CURB OPENING CATCH BASIN AND LOCAL DEPRESSION PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARD PLAN NO.300-3 AND 313-3 CASE E 5 EA 22,400 112,000 91 CONSTRUCT 19' CURB OPENING CATCH BASIN AND LOCAL DEPRESSION PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARD PLAN NO.300-3 AND 313-3 CASE E 1 EA 22,000 22,000 92 CONSTRUCT 14' CURB OPENING CATCH BASIN AND LOCAL DEPRESSION PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARD PLAN NO.300-3 AND 313-3 CASE E 2 EA 14,600 29,200 93 CONSTRUCT 10' CURB OPENING CATCH BASIN AND LOCAL DEPRESSION PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARD PLAN NO.300-3 AND 313-3 CASE E 3 EA 13,600 40,800 94 CONSTRUCT 7' MODIFIED CURB OPENING CATCH BASIN PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARD PLAN NO.300-3, WITH ENTRANCE PROJECTION PER STD. PLAN 314-3 CASE 1 AND PER DETAIL A, SEE SHEET 47
1 EA 30,000 30,000
95 CONSTRUCT (2-60" RCP) PCC HEADWALL PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN D86B. 1 EA 61,000 61,000 96 CONSTRUCT (1-48" OR 2-48" CMP) PCC HEADWALL PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN D86B. 2 EA 46,000 92,000 97 CONSTRUCT 4" PVC YARD DRAIN CONNECTION WITH FLEX COUPLING, CUT AND EXTEND AS NEEDED TO CONNECT TO PROPOSED RIP-RAP CHANNEL 1 EA 1,730 1,730
98 CONSTRUCT BRICK AND MORTAR BULKHEAD 1 EA 3,600 3,600 99 CONSTRUCT PIPE CONNECTION TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARD PLAN NO. 335-2 1 EA 11,200 11,200 100 CONSTRUCT PIPE CONNECTION, COAT WELDED, CUT AND ABRADED SURFACES AS SPECIFIED IN SSPCC 210-3.5 5 EA 1,370 6,850
101 CONSTRUCT WELDED CONNECTION AND CONNECT EXISTING ABS YARD DRAIN WITH FLEX COUPLING, COAT WELDED , CUT AND ABRADED SURFACES AS SPECIFIED IN SSPWC 210-3.5 1 EA 1,870 1,870 102 CONSTRUCT CHAIN-LINK FENCE PER SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FILE NO. S.P. 162 260 LF 50 13,000
103 CONSTRUCT 24" THICK GROUTED RIP-RAP 1/2 TON. PER SECTION 72 OF CALTRANS STD. SPECIFICATIONS 1,747 SF 47 82,109 1,364,971 104 INSTALL LED STREET LIGHT POLE FOOTINGS 41 EA 950 38,950 105 INSTALL 1-1/2” UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL CONDUIT FOR STREET LIGHTING 200 LF 45 9,000

Bid Schedule A
ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS QTY UNIT
Roadway Engineering &
Construction Corp.

UNIT COST TOTAL
106 INSTALL 3” UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL CONDUIT FOR STREET LIGHTING 12,120 LF 26 315,120 107 INSTALL UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL PULL BOX FOR STREET LIGHTING 41 EA 870 35,670 108 INSTALL NEW MP SERVICE CABINET, PULLBOX AND CONNECT TO SCE AS SHOWN ON PLANS 4 EA 11,200 44,800 109 INSTALL CENTRAL ISLAND LED DECORATIVE LIGHT PER SPECIFICATIONS 13 EA 2,600 33,800 110 INSTALL UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL CONDUIT, PULL BOXES AND CONDUCTOR FOR LANDSCAPE LIGHTING 4 EA 4,600 18,400 111 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, 8" SOLID WHITE CHANNELIZING STRIPE, PER FIG 3A-112 (CA), DETAIL 38 100 LF 1.72 172 112 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, 12" SOLID WHITE CROSSWALK LINE 350 350 3.45 1,207.50 113 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, 6" SOLID WHITE BIKE LANE STRIPE, PER FIG. 3A-112 (CA), DETAIL 39 10,328 LF 0.80 8,262.40 114 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, TYPE IV (L) ARROW AS SHOWN PER FIG. 3B-24 (CA) 2 EA 104 208 115 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, 12" SOLID WHITE LIMIT LINE 17 LF 3.45 58.65 116 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, 6" WHITE BIKE LANE INTERSECTION STRIPE, PER FIG. 3A-112 (CA), DETAIL 39A 2,508 LF 0.57 1,429.56 117 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, PAVEMENT LEGEND, PER FIG. 3B-23 (CA) 10 EA 155 1,550 118 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, BICYCLE LANE SYMBOL AND ARROW, PER FIG. 9B-3B (CA) 19 EA 120 2,280 119 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPE, PER FIG. 3A-104, DETAIL 22 7,653 LF 1.03 7,882.59 120 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, 12" SOLID WHITE LINE AS SHOWN 157 LF 3.45 541.65 121 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, STOP LEGEND, PER CA. MUTCD 2014, FIG. 3B-23 (CA) 4 EA 160 640 122 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, 12" SOLID YELLOW CROSSWALK LINE 237 LF 3.45 817.65 123 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, 4" SOLID YELLOW LEFT EDGE LINE, PER FIG. 3A-105 (CA), DETAIL 24 2,166 LF 0.63 1,364.58 124 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, 12" BROKEN WHITE 3-FT. STRIPE WITH 3-FT GAP 400 LF 3.45 1,380.00 125 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC, WHITE RIGHT EDGE LINE STRIPE, PER FIG. 3A-106 (CA), DETAIL 27B 256 LF 0.69 176.64 126 SANDBLAST ALL EXISTING CONFLICTING STRIPING 1 LS 11,400 11,400 127 FURNISH AND INSTALL STREET NAME SIGN AS NOTED PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. DWG. 421-0 9 EA 550 4,950 128 FURNISH AND INSTALL STREET NAME SIGN AS NOTED PER CITY OF CALIMESA STANDARDS 8 EA 530 4,240 129 FURNISH AND INSTALL SIGN 154 EA 340 52,360
130 RELOCATE EXISTING SIGN 22 EA 200 4,400
131 FURNISH AND INSTALL SIGN ON STREET LIGHT POLE OR POWER POLE 6 EA 144 864 132 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC SHARE LANE SYMBOL AND STRIPPED ARROWS PER CA. MUTCD 2014, FIG. 9C-9 (CA) AND 9C-108 (CA) 10 EA 98 980
133 APPLY THERMOPLASTIC 4" SOLID WHITE LANE STRIPE WITH TYPE G RPM 24' C-C 612 LF 0.86 526.32 134 CONSTRUCT 2" GALVANIZED PIPE PEDESTRIAN BARRIER, 6-FT WIDE, TYPE A, PER APWA STANDARD PLAN 606-4, FURNISH AND INSTALL SIGN TOP-CENTER AS NOTED 1 EA 1,200 1,200 TOTAL 6,192,274.54
Bid Schedule B
1 REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING WATER METER BOX BEHIND BACK OF WALK PER WATER COMPANY

STANDARDS, CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE RELOCATIONS AND/OR ADJUSTMENTS WITH SOUTH MESA

WATER COMPANY
43 EA 2,000 86,000
2 REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING 3” MAX. DIAM. BACK FLOW PREVENTER BEHIND BACK OF WALK PER

WATER COMPANY STANDARDS, CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE RELOCATIONS AND/OR ADJUSTMENTS

WITH SOUTH MESA WATER COMPANY
3 EA 17,700 53,100
3 REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT, AV/AR VALVE OR BLOW-OFF VALVE PER WATER

COMPANY STANDARDS, CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE RELOCATIONS AND/OR ADJUSTMENTS WITH

SOUTH MESA WATER DISTRICT
22 EA 12,400 272,800
4 INSTALL IRRIGATION METER PER WATER COMPANY STANDARDS, CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE INSTALLATION WITH SOUTH MESA WATER COMPANY 4 EA 7,900 31,600 Total 443,500.00
Bid Schedule C
1 MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION 1 LS 40,000 40,000
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SAFETY 1 LS 100,000 100,000
3 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE AND NPDES REQUIREMENTS 1 LS 100,000 100,000 4 PULVERIZE EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SHOWN 80,629 SF 0.20 16,125.80 5 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK 320 SF 2.25 720 6 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE 3,180 SF 2.25 7,155 7 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE CURB/CURB & GUTTER 334 LF 8 2,672 8 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING AC BERM 1,800 LF 5 9,000 9 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING TREE 13 EA 4,000 52,000 10 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CATCH BASIN 2 EA 6,800 13,600 11 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING 18" RCP 140 LF 86 12,040 12 REMOVE IN KIND EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLES AND DELIVER TO CITY STORAGE 8 EA 3,500 28,000 ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS QTY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS QTY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL

Bid Schedule A
ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS QTY UNIT
Roadway Engineering &
Construction Corp.

UNIT COST TOTAL
13 REMOVE EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNALCABINET/BOX AND DELIVER TO CITY STORAGE 1 EA 1,060 1,060 14 REMOVE AND REPLACE MAILBOX W/NEW POST BEHIND CURB. PLACE MAILBOX AND POST IN 5 GAL.

BUCKET FILLED W/DIRT DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8 EA 450 3,600 15 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF INTERFERING PORTIONS OF EXISTING WALL 12 LF 150 1,800 16 REMOVE AND RELOCATE IN KIND INTERFERING PORTIONS OF EX. FENCE TO R/W 563 LF 45 25,335 17 REMOVE EXISTING SIGN 4 EA 29 116
18 REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING SIGN 4 EA 230 920
19 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING DRAIN PIPE 6 LF 150 900 20 SAWCUT EXISTING ASPHALT 564 LF 1.50 846
21 SAWCUT EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT 18 LF 1.50 27
22 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING SAFETY NETTING FENCE 93 LF 20 1,860 23 REMOVE AND DISPOSE METAL POSTS 3 EA 500 1,500
24 COMMUNICATIONS RISER TO BE RELOCATED BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANY FOR RELOCATION 2 EA 500 1,000
25 CONSTRUCT 1.5" MINIMUM OF ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY OVER 3" OF ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 85,284 SF 3 255,852 26 CONSTRUCT 4.5" THICK AGGREGATE BASE (PULVERIZED MATERIAL). 85,284 SF 1 85,284 27 CONSTRUCT 4" TYPE A ISLAND PASSAGEWAY PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A88A, AND PER DETAIL SHEET 931 SF 14 13,034
28 CONSTRUCT 8" OF PCC CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER 12" COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL 2,158 SF 15 32,370 29 GRIND EXISTING PAVEMENT 0.10' MIN. AND CONSTRUCT PAVEMENT OVERLAY 0.10' MIN 2,767 SF 1.50 4,150.50 30 CONSTRUCT 4" OF PCC STAMPED CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER 12” COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL 3,178 SF 14 44,492 31 CONSTRUCT 8" CURB & GUTTER PER SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY STD. NO. 115. 2,492 LF 40 99,680 32 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB & GUTTER PER SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY STD. NO. 116. 102 LF 40 4,080 33 CONSTRUCT 6" CONCRETE CURB ONLY PER SPPWC STANDARD PLAN 120-2 TYPE A1- 6(200). 1,414 LF 35 49,490 34 CONSTRUCT 6" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER PER SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY STD. NO.116. (MODIFIED). 98 LF 40 3,920 35 CONSTRUCT 3.5" MOUNTABLE CURB PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. 295 LF 42 12,390 36 CONSTRUCT 8" AC DIKE PER COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STD. NO. 117. 70 LF 10 700 37 CONSTRUCT 4" AC DIKE PER COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STD. NO. 117 (MODIFIED). 75 LF 10 750 38 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. DWG. NO. 115-2 TYPE "B" (WIDTH PER PLAN). 12,609 SF 5 63,045 39 CONSTRUCT (MODIFIED) RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. DWG. NO. 109-2 AND DETAILS ON SHEET 12. 1,011 SF 8 8,088
40 CONSTRUCT (MODIFIED) RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. DWG. NO. 109-2 AND DETAILS ON SHEET12. (3" ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER 12" COMPACTED SUBGRADE) 981 SF 8 7,848 41 CONSTRUCT (MODIFIED) COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. DWG. NO. 110-1 1,084 SF 9 9,756 42 CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER SPPWC STD PLAN 111-5 CASE B, TYPE 1 (MODIFIED) AS SHOWN ON PLANS. 9 EA 4,500 40,500 43 CONSTRUCT BIKE RAMP PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. 208 SF 12 2,496 44 CONSTRUCT DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE "TRUNCATED DOMES" PER DETAIL ON SHEET 12. 19 EA 500 9,500 45 ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE 11 EA 1,970 21,670
46 ADJUST GAS VALVE BOX TO GRADE 1 EA 200 200
47 ADJUST WATER VALVE TO GRADE 10 EA 200 2,000
48 ADJUST CLEANOUT TO GRADE 1 EA 200 200
49 CONSTRUCT 4” PCC OVER 12” COMPACTED SUBGRADE 52 SF 12 624 50 CONSTRUCT 3” ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER 12” COMPACTED SUBGRADE 562 SF 5 2,810 51 CONSTRUCT 3” GRAVEL OVER 12” COMPACTED SUBGRADE 525 SF 5 2,625 52 CONSTRUCT 12" RCP PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. PLAN 106-3 (D-LOAD PER PLAN) 79 LF 234 18,486 53 CONSTRUCT 15" RCP PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. PLAN 106-3 (D-LOAD PER PLAN) 87 LF 270 23,490 54 CONSTRUCT 24" RCP PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. PLAN 106-3 (D-LOAD PER PLAN) 327 LF 156 51,012 55 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE COLLAR PER SPPWC STD. PLAN 380-4 1 EA 5,000 5,000 56 CONSTRUCT TRANSITION JUNCTION STRUCTURE PER SPPWC STD. PLAN 341-2 1 EA 14,800 14,800 57 CONSTRUCT CURB OPENING CATCH BASIN WITH GRATING(S) PER SPPWC STD. PLAN 302-3 3 EA 21,600 64,800 58 CONSTRUCT GRATING CATCH BASIN PER SPPWC STD. PLAN 304-3 1 EA 10,800 10,800 59 CONSTRUCT LOCAL DEPRESSION PER SPPWC STD. PLAN 313-3 3 EA 2,770 8,310 60 CONNECT TO EXISTING JUNCTION STRUCTURE PER SPPWC STD. PLAN 335-2 3 EA 5,600 16,800 61 INSTALL GRATE INLET R-3501-TB NEENAH FOUNDRY CO. OR APPROVED EQUAL (HEAVY DUTY) SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 14 1 EA 6,400 6,400
62 PAINT 4" THERMOPLASTIC WHITE LANE LINE PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3A-102(CA), DETAIL 8 1,068 LF 0.57 608.76
63 PAINT 4" THERMOPLASTIC SOLID YELLOW LINE - TWO DIRECTION NO PASSING PATTERN PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION FIGURE, 3A-104(CA), DETAIL 21 124 LF 2 248 64 PAINT 4" THERMOPLASTIC SOLID YELLOW EDGE LINE PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3A105(CA), DETAIL 24 2,015 LF 0.69 1,390.35 65 PAINT 4" THERMOPLASTIC WHITE EDGE LINE PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3A-106(CA), DETAIL 27B 501 LF 0.69 345.69
66 PAINT 4" THERMOPLASTIC YELLOW TWO- WAY LEFT TURN LANE PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3A-108(CA), DETAIL 31 970 LF 2.90 2,813
67 PAINT 8" THERMOPLASTIC WHITE LANE DROP LINE PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3A-111(CA), DETAIL 37D 52 LF 2 104
68 PAINT 4" THERMOPLASTIC WHITE CHANNELIZING LINE PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3A112(CA), DETAIL 38 140 LF 0.69 96.60 69 PAINT 6" THERMOPLASTIC WHITE CHANNELIZING LINE PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3A112(CA), DETAIL 38 646 LF 0.92 594.32 70 PAINT 8" THERMOPLASTIC WHITE CHANNELIZING LINE PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3A112(CA), DETAIL 38A 309 LF 1.38 426.42

Bid Schedule A
ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS QTY UNIT
Roadway Engineering &
Construction Corp.

UNIT COST TOTAL
71 PAINT 6" THERMOPLASTIC WHITE BIKE LANE LINE PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3A-112(CA), DETAIL 39 1,506 LF 0.86 1,295.16
72 PAINT 6" THERMOPLASTIC WHITE BIKE LANE LINE PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3A-112(CA), DETAIL 39A 218 LF 0.63 137.34
73 PAINT 12" THERMOPLASTIC SOLID WHITE CROSSWALK LINE (CONTINENTAL) AT 18" SPACING PER DETAIL ON SHEET 11 AND CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION SECTION 3B.19 9 EA 253 2,277 74 PAINT 12" THERMOPLASTIC SOLID WHITE CROSSWALK LINES (STANDARD) PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION SECTION 3B.19 1 EA 380 380
75 PAINT 12" THERMOPLASTIC WHITE STOP LINE PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION SECTION 3B.16 1 EA 58 58 76 PAINT 18" THERMOPLASTIC BROKEN WHITE YIELD LINE, 2.5 FT. LONG WITH 2' GAP PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION 8 EA 47 376
77 PAINT THERMOPLASTIC WHITE TRIANGLE YIELD LINE PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION FIGURE 3B-16 5 EA 75 375 78 PAINT "STOP" THERMOPLASTIC WHITE LEGEND PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3B-23(CA) 1 EA 160 160 79 PAINT "YIELD" THERMOPLASTIC WHITE LEGEND PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3B-23(CA) 8 EA 184 1,472 80 PAINT "ONLY" THERMOPLASTIC WHITE LEGEND PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3B-23(CA) 1 EA 160 160 81 PAINT WORDS, ARROW AND SYMBOL, MARKERS PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 9C-3(CA) 9 EA 46 414 82 PAINT THERMOPLASTIC TYPE 1 ARROW PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3B- 24(CA) 2 EA 98 196 83 PAINT THERMOPLASTIC TYPE IV ARROW PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3B-24(CA) 9 EA 104 936 84 PAINT THERMOPLASTIC TYPE VI ARROW PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3B-24(CA) 3 EA 230 690 85 PAINT THERMOPLASTIC TYPE VII ARROW PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3B-24(CA) 17 EA 144 2,448 86 INSTALL "STOP" SIGN (R1-1) PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 2B-1 1 EA 374 374 87 INSTALL "YIELD" SIGN (R1-2) PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 2B-1 10 EA 360 3,600 88 INSTALL CHEVRON PLAQUE SIGN (R6-4B) PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 2B-20 4 EA 630 2,520 89 INSTALL "PEDESTRIAN" (W11-2) SIGN WITH "ARROW" (W16-7PL) SIGN PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 2C-11 AND 2C-12 16 EA 380 6,080
90 INSTALL "ROUNDABOUT" SIGN (W2-6) WITH "20 MPH" SPEED ADVISORY PLATE (W13-1P) SIGN PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 2C-9 8 EA 450 3,600
91 INSTALL MAPTYPE DIRECTIONAL SIGN WHITE ON GREEN PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION 4 EA 1,300 5,200 92 INSTALL LANE ASSIGNMENT SIGN BLACK ON WHITE PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 2B-5 2 EA 400 800 93 INSTALL ILLUMINATED FLEXIBLE BOLLARD (R4-7) KEEP RIGHT SYMBOL (3FT HEIGHT) PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 2B-10 4 EA 300 1,200
94 INSTALL ARROW SHAPED DESTINATION SIGN WHITE ON GREEN W/WHITE CHEVRON ON RT. EDGE MOUNTED 18" ABOVE ROADWAY PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION 4 EA 390 1,560 95 INSTALL KEEP LEFT/RIGHT (W12-1) SIGN PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 2C-5 1 EA 374 374 96 INSTALL LANE MERGING (W4-2) SIGN PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 2C-8 1 EA 374 374 97 INSTALL "BIKE LANE" (R81(CA)) SIGN PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 9B-2 6 EA 276 1,656 98 INSTALL "BEGIN" (R81A(CA)) SIGN PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 9B-2 3 EA 46 138 99 INSTALL "END" (R81B(CA)) SIGN PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 9B-2 3 EA 46 138 100 INSTALL ONE WAY (R6-1R) SIGN (RIGHT) PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 2B-13 5 EA 370 1,850 101 INSTALL REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKER PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 3A-112(CA) 23 EA 5.80 133.40 102 INSTALL TYPE 2 OBJECT MARKER (OM2-1V) PER CA MUTCD LATEST EDITION, FIGURE 2C-13 1 EA 86 86 103 SANDBLAST EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS 2 EA 1,450 2,900 104 REMOVE, REPAIR, AND REPLACE EXISTING TURF LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION IN KIND. 1 LS 24,000 24,000 Total 1,492,314.34
Bid Schedule D
1 REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING WATER METER AND BOX PER WATER COMPANY STANDARDS.

CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH SOUTH MESA WATER COMPANY 7 EA 2,100.00 14,700 2 REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING BACKFLOW DEVICE PER WATER COMPANY STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH SOUTH MESA WATER COMPANY 1 EA 17,700.00 17,700 3 REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PER WATER COMPANY STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH SOUTH MESA WATER COMPANY 2 EA 12,600.00 25,200 Total 57,600.00
ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS QTY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL

SUBJECT: AMEND AND RESTATE THE FAIR SHARE AGREEMENT

FOR COUNTY LINE ROAD CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
PARK AVENUE TO BRYANT STREET SB 1 2018 LOCAL

PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM GRANT
MEETING DATE: February 22, 2022
PREPARED BY: Bonnie Johnson, City Manager
Michael Thornton, City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Approve the Amended and Restated Fair Share Agreement for the County Line Road Corridor Improvements from Park Avenue to Bryant Street SB 1 2018 Local Partnership Program Grant; and

2. Approve Resolution 2022-07 a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Calimesa California, amending the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget to include an adjustment in the Street and Traffic Development Impact Fee (Fund 36) for the construction of the County Line Road Corridor Improvement Project including design, construction, contingency, and construction management.

BACKGROUND: The Cities of Calimesa and Yucaipa are collaborating on construction of roadway and drainage improvements along County Line Road (CLR) between Park Avenue and Bryant Street. Since the proposed improvements are located in both cities, the cities have executed two fair share agreements that identified funding obligations of both cities. On March 5, 2018, and November 2, 2020, Council approved the respective agreements. This report pertains to the November 2, 2020, agreement.

In January of 2018, Calimesa and Yucaipa partnered on a grant application for SB 1 Local Partnership Program (LPP) funding in the amount of $3,747,000. This grant was not only targeting other areas on County Line Road not covered by the ATP and MSRC grants, but also overlapped with the 2018 Agreement for improvements not covered by ATP and MSRC; namely the multiple roundabouts (intersection improvements) planned for County Line Road. The cities were awarded this grant in the May of 2018. Funds were allocated by the CTC to the cities on March 25, 2021.

The cities have 12 months after the date of allocation to award a contract. After award of the contract, the cities have up to 36 months to complete the construction. The grant amounts are shared between the two cities – see the Fiscal Impact section below.

STAFF REPORT FROM FEBRUARY 22, 2022 COUNCIL

MEETING WITH ATTACHMENTS
As you may recall, on February 7, 2022, Calimesa City Council awarded a contract for construction of the above project to be partially funded by LPP. At that meeting, staff advised that the LPP Fair Share Agreement would come back to you on February 22, 2022, to update each City’s funding obligations to reflect the awarded bid and actual costs leading up to construction. As such that Agreement has been amended and restated. Attached to this staff report is a redline (track changes) version of said Agreement. It should be noted that Yucaipa staff plans to take the Agreement, as amended, forward to their City Council on February 28th. Concurrently, our City Engineer and City Clerk are working to with the contractor to obtain all required signatures, insurance and bonds necessary to proceed.

FISCAL IMPACT: Calimesa’s estimated total fiscal impact from the 2018 Agreement (as amended by the November 2020 agreement) is $596,000. Calimesa’s portion of the 2018 Agreement is being funded by SB 1 RMRA (Road Maintenance and Repair Act) annual allocations over five years. The LPP project is an estimated total cost of $13,569,366. The LPP grant, for construction only, is in the amount of $3,747,000. The remaining cost of $9,822,366 is the local match requirement. Calimesa’s local match for the LPP agreement is estimated to be $2,581,027; while Yucaipa’s local match is estimated to be $7,241,339. Calimesa’s fair share will be funded by a combination of Development Impact fees (DIF), RMRA, MSRC Grant and contributions from developers. Although a budget adjustment is necessary (Resolution 2022-07) to properly reflect total project costs and fair share splits, staff does not anticipate having to reallocate any of the funding previously committed to the Citywide paving project.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A: Redline version of Amended and Restated Agreement Attachment B: Resolution 2022-07

AMENDED AND RESTATED FAIR SHARE AGREEMENT

COUNTY LINE ROAD CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS

PARK AVENUE TO BRYANT STREET
SB 1 2018 LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM GRANT
This Amended and Restated Agreement is made and entered into this __ day of _______, 202220, by the City of Calimesa, a California municipal corporation (“Calimesa”) and the City of Yucaipa, a California municipal corporation (“Yucaipa”).

WHEREAS, the Cities of Calimesa and Yucaipa (collectively referred to as the “Cities” or “Parties” and individually as “City” or “Party”) recognize the need to construct improvements on County Line Road from Park Avenue to Bryant Street in order to improve operation and traffic flow through the intersections, and provide safe paths of travel for pedestrians and bicyclists; and WHEREAS, a critical component of these improvements includes various street improvements and upgrades from Park Avenue to Bryant Street which include the replacement of various intersections at County Line Road from signalized or 4-way stop intersections to roundabout intersections; installation of sidewalks, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) curb ramps, bike lanes, and utility relocations; and associated street improvements including street widening and asphalt removal and replacements (hereafter referred to as the “Project”, detailed in Section I below, and shown on Exhibit “A” attached hereto); and WHEREAS, the Cities of Calimesa and Yucaipa have received a SB 1 Local Partnership Program (LLP) Grant in the amount of $3,747,000 for the construction of said Project improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Cities of Yucaipa and Calimesa will mutually benefit from the Project in proportion to the work to be done in each City’s jurisdiction, and agree to fund the outstanding Project costs not covered by this grant, as shown in Exhibit “B”, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

WHEREAS, the Cities of Yucaipa and Calimesa entered into an Agreement titled “Fair Share Agreement County Line Road Corridor Improvements Calimesa Boulevard to Bryant Street” (“Prior Agreement”) dated March 5, 2018, and an the execution of this Agreement titled “Fair Share Agreement County Line Road Corridor Improvements Park Avenue to Bryant Street SB 1 Local Partnership Program Grant” dated November 2, 2020 will that supplemented the Project Scope of Work and both cities Obligations with respect to said Prior “Agreement” and amended Exhibit B of said Prior “Agreement” to reflect estimated funding and cost sharing. as shown on the Exhibit B attached herein.

WHEREAS, the Cities of Yucaipa and Calimesa now desire to Amend and Restate the Agreement titled “Fair Share Agreement County Line Road Corridor Improvements Park Avenue to Bryant Street SB 1 Local Partnership Program Grant” to incorporate updated funding and cost sharing of the Cities based upon awarded bid as reflected on the Exhibit B attached herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, it is agreed by the Cities as follows:

SECTION I. PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK
A. The Project Scope of Work shall include the design and construction of the following improvements on County Line Road:
• Park Avenue to 5th Street Intersection – Street widening and improvements between Park Avenue and west terminus of 5th Street Intersection, including ADA compliant sidewalks and curb ramps, asphalt pavement, center median, bike lanes, curb and gutter improvements, utility relocations, striping, markings, remove and replace (R&R) the existing asphalt and signage, and associated street improvements. • 5
th Street Intersection – New two-lane roundabout to replace the current signalized intersection including right-of-way acquisition, curb and gutter, sidewalk, ADA curb ramps, utility relocations, bike lanes, striping, markings and signage, associated street improvements, and the extension of a new storm drain and connection to the existing Riverside County Flood Control Calimesa Creek Channel or proposed storm drain if it is constructed first. • 3
rd Street, 2nd Street, California Street and Bryant Street Intersections – New roundabout intersections to replace the current four way stop intersections, between the terminus of lane tapers and connections to proposed and/or existing lane configurations, including right-of-way acquisition, curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm drain/drainage improvements, ADA curb ramps, utility relocations, asphalt pavement, bike lanes, striping, markings and signage, and associated street improvements.
• 5
th Street East (Mid-Block) to 4th Street – Street improvements including curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm drain/drainage improvements, ADA curb ramps, utility relocations, asphalt pavement, bike lanes, striping, markings and signage, and associated street improvements.
• 4
th Street to 3th Street – Street improvements including curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm drain/drainage improvements, ADA curb ramps, utility relocations, asphalt pavement, bike lanes, striping, markings and signage, and associated street improvements.
• California Street to Bryant Street – Street improvements including curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm drain/drainage improvements, ADA curb ramps, utility relocations, asphalt pavement, bike lanes, striping, markings and signage, and associated street improvements.

SECTION II. OBLIGATION OF BOTH CITIES
A. Both Parties agree to cooperate in a joint effort to complete the Project improvements in a timely and efficient manner to the benefit of results to both communities.

B. Both Parties agree to cooperate in efforts to obtain additional State and Federal funding where practically for mutually beneficial, planning, transportation and park related improvements.

C. Both Parties will strive to meet all timeframes set forth in this Agreement, recognizing certain delays may be unavoidable. The Parties agree to notify each other promptly in the event a situation occurs that will cause delay.

D. Both Parties agree to fund the right of way acquisition required for the Project within their own jurisdiction. Total Project estimates reflected in Sections III and IV below include right of way estimates, however actual costs may vary. Any variance related to right of way costs will be borne by or result in a savings to the respective city.

E. Both Parties agree to negotiate and consider a separate agreement for the master planned improvements to County Line Road, between the I-10 Freeway and the Easterly Beginning of Curve (BC) of the intersection with Calimesa Boulevard. This separate agreement will identify the terms, conditions and fair share obligations for those improvements.

F. Both Parties agree to negotiate and consider a separate agreement for the preparation of the Interstate 10 Interchange at County Line Road Project Study Report-Project Development Support (PSR-PDS). This separate agreement will identify the terms, conditions and fair share obligations for the preparation of the PSR-PDS.

SECTION III. OBLIGATIONS OF CALIMESA
A. Calimesa shall serve as the lead agency for the SB 1 Local Partnership Program Grant Project soliciting Requests for Proposals for special consultants, as required, and awarding contract(s). The Project Scope of Work, as identified in Section I and Exhibit “A”, includes the preparation of plans, specifications and cost estimates (excepting the segment between Park Avenue and up to and including the 5th Street Intersection shown as LPP-1 and LPP-2 on Exhibit B); preparation of required environmental documents; the identification and acquisition of the necessary rights-of-way (excepting the segment between Park Avenue and up to and including the 5 th Street Intersection shown as LPP-1 and LPP-2 on Exhibit B); preparation of bid documents and advertising of bids; construction inspection and management; and project administration.

B. Calimesa shall provide the services of the City Engineer (known as Project Engineer) for the purpose of certifying plans, providing cost estimates, inspections, maintaining all records and providing all reporting as required by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), approving all change orders and/or stop notices, and all other work necessary to complete the Project. The Segments may be constructed under one or more contracts in accordance with State law.

C. Calimesa shall provide the services of a Project Manager for the purpose of administering the Project and coordinating the activities of Cities, consultant(s), contractor(s), permitting agencies, and Caltrans.

D. Calimesa shall provide Yucaipa an opportunity to review and comment at all stages during the design of each Segment of the Project.

E. Calimesa shall require consultant(s) and contractor(s) to purchase and maintain the insurance specified in Exhibit “C” naming the Cities of Calimesa and Yucaipa as additional insureds with such insurance as primary to any insurance of either City. Calimesa shall require the contractor(s) to furnish performance and payment bonds as required by State law. Calling of the

bond(s) or use of any proceeds will be initiated by Calimesa at the direction of the Project Engineer).

F. Calimesa shall require the contractor(s) to furnish in advance of the “Notice to Proceed” a traffic control plan(s) mutually agreeable to both Cities.

G. Calimesa shall expend funds as required for the Project. Cities shall be responsible for all Project costs within their own jurisdiction. Approximate project percentages per jurisdiction is identified on Exhibit “B”. Calimesa shall be responsible for the SB 1 2018 Local Partnership Program Grant approved for County Line Road of $3,747,000. Under no circumstances shall the total Project cost of all phases exceed $10,050,00013,600,000 without an amendment to this Agreement.

H. Calimesa shall obtain approval from Yucaipa for each bid package prior to bidding a phase of construction.

I. Calimesa shall allow Yucaipa to inspect all work within the City of Yucaipa’s jurisdiction throughout the Project’s term and to conduct a final inspection of the improvements prior to the recordation(s) of a Notice of Completion(s) for the improvements by Calimesa.

J. Calimesa shall obtain approval from Yucaipa before issuance of any change orders or stop work orders that could potentially affect Yucaipa’s cost. This approval will be assured by requiring the Project Manager or Project Engineer to approve all change orders or stop work orders.

Yucaipa will be made aware of situations where time is of the essence in order to avoid potential delay costs and, in upon such notice from Calimesa, Yucaipa’s review time will be shortened to one (1) business day or the request will be deemed approved.

K. Calimesa shall withhold retention funds from the contractor(s) according to State law.

L. Calimesa shall submit to Yucaipa, on a monthly basis, a status of the work completed to date accompanied by a detailed listing of expenditures of the current month and total spent to date. This will also include a fair share project invoice to Yucaipa if appropriate.

M. Following the recordation of a Notice of Completion, Calimesa shall provide a final accounting of all costs incurred associated with the project as outlined in this Agreement. This accounting, based upon actual project costs, shall be used to determine any reimbursement required from Calimesa to Yucaipa or Yucaipa to Calimesa, and shall be completed no later than sixty (60) calendar days following said recordation.

SECTION IV. OBLIGATIONS OF YUCAIPA
A. Yucaipa shall remain the lead agency with regard to the improvements in the Prior “Agreement” approved on March 5, 2018 for the segments shown as E and F on Exhibit B.

With relation to the SB1 2018 Local Partnership Program Grant funded improvements as reflected in Section III A. of this Agreement, the following shall apply:

B. Yucaipa shall provide the services of its City Engineer for the purpose of certifying plans and as-built plans, reviewing cost estimates, inspections and records as required for each Segment of the Project.

C. Yucaipa shall complete the review and provide comments on all plans, specifications, cost estimates and other documents provided by Calimesa within five (5) working days of receiving the review request from Calimesa or the submittal will be deemed approved. In situations where time may be of the essence and in order to avoid delay costs, Yucaipa will be made aware of those circumstances and the response time will be shortened to one (1) business - day.

D. Yucaipa shall be responsible for the preparation of plans, specifications and cost estimates; and the identification and acquisition of necessary right-of-way for the segment between Park Avenue and up to and including the 5th Street Intersection.

E. Yucaipa shall identify the source of funds and authorize the expenditure of up to $4,410,250 7,242,000 for payment of their share of improvements on this Project, as identified in Exhibit “B”. All costs associated with Section IV D above as well as right-of-way for all other Yucaipa segments, which is estimated to be $ 1,119,5002,279,930, which includes the $571,000259,390 referenced in Section IV E, 1, c below, shall be applied to Yucaipa’s share of improvements on this Project. This results in a net estimated fair share to be paid to Calimesa in the amount of $3,290,7504,962,070. Payment of funds from Yucaipa to Calimesa shall be as follows:
1) Yucaipa shall deposit $653,500435,000 to Calimesa within thirty (30) calendar days from execution of this Agreement by both Cities.

This amount shall be the total Yucaipa share for Project Approval and Environmental; Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimates; and is calculated as follows:
a. $1,224,500 693,000– Yucaipa share for Project Approval and Environmental; Plans, Specifications and Cost
Estimates as identified in the 2018 Local Partnership
Program Application (LPP Application);
b. Minus $571,000258,000 for the cost of Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimates for the segment from Park Avenue up to and including the 5th Street Intersection (as identified in the LPP Application) to be performed by Yucaipa.
c. Yucaipa shall pay “fair share” invoices submitted by Calimesa for the construction phase of the project (including Construction management, inspection, soils and survey)
within thirty (30) days of receipt. Yucaipa’s total share of construction as reflected on “Exhibit B” is estimated to be $2,637,2504,530,000.

F. Under no circumstances shall Yucaipa’s cost exceed $4,410,2507,242,000 without an amendment to this Agreement. However, it is understood that design and construction costs may escalate and that it is difficult to predict what the actual costs may be at this time.

Consequently, both Parties agree to periodically review, at each phase of the projects, the estimated costs and adjust the fair share costs for the Project as needed and update said costs in the same fair share percentages prescribed herein.

G.

SECTION V. MISCELLANEOUS
A. Notices. All notices, demands, requests, consents, approvals, or communications from one Party to another shall be personally delivered or sent by facsimile or e-mail to the persons set forth below and shall be deemed given one (1) business day after it is sent. Alternatively, it shall be deemed given five (5) calendar days after deposit in the United States mail, certified and postage prepaid, return receipt requested, and addressed as follows, or at such other address as either Party may from time to time specify to the other parties in writing:

To Calimesa: City of Calimesa
908 Park Avenue
Calimesa, California 92320
Attn: City Manager
Fax: 909.795.4399
E-mail: [email protected]
To Yucaipa City of Yucaipa
34272 Yucaipa Boulevard
Yucaipa, California 92399
Attn: City Manager
Fax: 909.790.9203
E-mail: [email protected]
The Parties agree to accept facsimile or scanned signed documents and agree to rely upon such documents as if they bore original signatures. Each Party agrees to provide to the other parties, within seventy-two (72) hours after transmission of such a facsimile or scan, the original documents that bear the original signatures.

B. Amendment. This Agreement may not be modified or amended, nor any provision or breach waived, except with approval of both Parties in a writing signed by both Parties which expressly refers to this Agreement.

C. Venue. The venue of any action or claim brought by any Party to this Agreement shall be either the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino District, or the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside. If any action or claim concerning this Agreement is brought by any third-party and filed in another venue, the Parties hereto agree to use their best efforts to obtain a change of venue to either the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino District, or the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside.

D. Neutral Interpretation. Cities have each cooperated in the drafting and preparation of this Agreement and in any construction to be made of this Agreement, the same shall not be construed against either Party to this Agreement in the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute regarding the interpretation of any matter herein.

E. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

F. Term. Except as otherwise provided in Subsection (C) and (E) of Section IV, this Agreementshall terminate ninety (90) days after completion and acceptance of the final accounting of the contracts of all Segments of the Project (as identified in Section II) by both Cities, or as mutually agreed to by both Cities in writing.

G. Applicable Law. The validity, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California.

SECTION VI. MUTUAL INDEMNIFICATION
A. Neither Party to this Agreement nor officers nor employees thereof shall be responsible for any claim, lawsuit, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the other Party to the Agreement under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction not delegated to the parties under this Agreement. It is also agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, each Party shall fully defend, indemnify and hold the other Party harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done under or in connection with work, authority, or jurisdiction of that Party under this Agreement.

B. In the event any action is commenced to enforce or interpret the terms or conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall, in addition to any other costs and relief, be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Both Parties agree to submit any unresolved issues to binding arbitration, upon terms to be negotiated and agreed upon between the Parties.

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have authorized this Agreement to be executed by their respective officials thereunto duly authorized.

ATTEST: CITY OF CALIMESA
A Municipal Corporation
Darlene Gerdes, City Clerk Date William Davis, Mayor Date ATTEST:

CITY OF YUCAIPA
A Municipal Corporation
Jennifer Crawford, City Clerk Date Raymond A. Casey, City Manager
Date

RESOLUTION 2022-07

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FY 2021-22 BUDGET TO INCLUDE AN

ADJUSTMENT IN THE STREET AND TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT IMPACT

FEE FUND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE COUNTY LINE ROAD

CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT INCLUDING DESIGN,

CONSTRUCTION, CONTINGENCY AND CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT
WHEREAS, the Cities of Calimesa and Yucaipa are collaborating on construction of roadway and drainage improvements along County Line Road (CLR) between Park Avenue and Bryant Street; and
WHEREAS, since the proposed improvements are located in both cities, the cities have executed two fair share agreements that identified the funding obligations of both cities, namely Fair Share Agreement with the City of Yucaipa for County Line Road Corridor Improvements from Calimesa Boulevard to Bryant Street approved in 2018 and the Fair Share Agreement County Line Road Corridor Improvements from Calimesa Boulevard to Bryant Street approved in 2020 and specific to the SB 1 Local Partnership Program Grant; and
WHEREAS, on August 24, 2021, the City received two bids for project construction and, due to a variety of factors, the bid amounts received far exceeded the construction budget; and
WHEREAS, on October 18, 2022, staff recommended, and the City Council approved, rejecting all bids, permitting staff to rescope the project to reduce costs, rebid the project, and bring a subsequent recommendation of award back to City Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, on January 19, 2022, the City received 5 bids and awarded a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder on February 7, 2022; and WHEREAS, based upon the bid award, the funding obligations for both cities have changed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now deems it appropriate to amend the 2020 Agreement (referenced above) to reflect the updated funding obligations for each city and to amend the City of Calimesa’s Capital Improvement Program Budget accordingly.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

The Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program Budget (Fund 36) is hereby amended as follows:
• Increase appropriations in account 36-2087-8700 by $1,820,661 • Increase revenue in account 36-2087-4800 by $1,671,320

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 22nd day of February 2022. _____________________________________

WILLIAM DAVIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________

DARLENE GERDES, CITY CLERK

City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 10
SUBJECT: PUBLIC SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNUAL

LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2022
PRESENTED BY: Celeste Reid, Finance Director
PREPARED BY: Celeste Reid, Finance Director
Lyn Gruber, Special Tax Consultant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-32, A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Calimesa Acting As The Legislative Body Of Public Services Community Facilities District No. 1 (Law Enforcement, Fire, Paramedic And Park Maintenance Services) Authorizing The Annual Levy Of Special Taxes For Fiscal Year 2022/2023.

SUMMARY: On September 5, 2006 the City Council formed Public Services Community Facilities District No. 1 (Law Enforcement, Fire, Paramedic and Park Maintenance Services) (“CFD”) for the purpose of providing a secure revenue source for additional law enforcement, fire, paramedic, and park maintenance services within areas of new development. On March 19, 2007 the JP Ranch Development was annexed into the CFD.

Fiscal year (“FY”) 2008/2009 was the first year the CFD was levied. To date 1,208 units of Developed Property are taxable for FY 2022/2023. The Rate and Method of Apportionment provides for the levy of special taxes on Developed Property as defined in the Rate and Method of Apportionment (“RMA”), which are parcels for which building permits were issued as of May 1, 2022, to fund the authorized services and to pay for administration of the CFD. The increased number of permits is a result of development in Singleton Heights, JP Ranch and Summerwind Trails.

FISCAL IMPACT: If the Council approves the CFD special tax levy for FY 2022/2023 it will provide approximately $808,901 to fund the authorized services and pay for administrative costs associated with the CFD, if there are no delinquencies. The FY 2022/2023 levy amount is based on levying Developed Property at the applicable FY 2022/2023 Special Taxes rates listed in Exhibit “A” of the Resolution. This amount may escalate by the greater of two percent (2.0%) or the increase in the Consumer Price Index (July to July) per year. Since the change in CPI was 3.93%, the proposed rates have been increased by 3.93%.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A: Resolution No. 2022-32

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-32

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF CALIMESA ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY

OF PUBLIC SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 1 (LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE,

PARAMEDIC AND PARK MAINTENANCE SERVICES)

AUTHORIZING THE ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL
TAXES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023
WHEREAS, the City Council (“Council”) of the City of Calimesa, (“City”), has previously undertook proceedings under and pursuant to the terms and provisions of the “MelloRoos Community Facilities Act of 1982”, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, to form Public Services Community Facilities District No. 1 (Law Enforcement, Fire, Paramedic and Park Maintenance Services) (the “District”), to authorize the levy of special taxes upon land within the District to finance certain facilities.

WHEREAS, this Council, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this Council is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax for the District to be collected for the next fiscal year.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2. That in accordance with the Act and Ordinance, there is hereby levied upon all parcels within the District which are not otherwise exempt from taxation under the Act or the Ordinance the special taxes for fiscal year 2022/2023 at the rates set forth in the attached referenced and incorporated Exhibit “A”. Koppel & Gruber Public Finance is hereby directed to prepare and file with the City Clerk a list of the exact amount of the special tax for each lot or parcel of land in accordance with this Resolution (the “2022/2023 Roll”).

SECTION 3. That the rate determined and as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this Council, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District, and is exempt from Proposition 218, Section XIIID of the California State Constitution.

Attachment 10A

SECTION 4. That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following:
(1) police protection services;
(2) fire protection/paramedic services;
(3) park maintenance services; and
(4) the incidental expenses related to financing, forming and administering the District.

The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

SECTION 5. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax.

SECTION 6. All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including any reserve fund.

SECTION 7. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the County of Riverside (“County”) Office of the Auditor-Controller (“County Auditor”). The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit “A”.

SECTION 8. This Resolution relating to the levy of the special tax shall take effect immediately upon its final passage in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 53340, as amended.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 18
th DAY OF JULY, 2022.
____________________________________

WILLIAM DAVIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:

DARLENE GERDES, CITY CLERK

EXHIBIT "A"
PUBLIC SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
(LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE, PARAMEDIC AND PARK MAINTENANCE SERVICES) FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023

SPECIAL TAX RATES
Tax Classification FY 2022/2023
Single-Family Unit $669.62 per Unit
Multi-Family Unit $502.22 per Unit
Non-Residential Parcel $3,348.16 per Acre

City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 11
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2012-1(SINGLETON HEIGHTS)

ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2022

PREPARED &
PRESENTED BY: Celeste Reid, Finance Director
Lyn Gruber, Special Tax Consultant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Adopt Resolution No. 2022-33 A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Calimesa Acting As The Legislative Body Of The Community Facilities District No. 2012-1 (Singleton Heights), Authorizing The Annual Levy Of Special Taxes For Fiscal Year 2022/2023.

SUMMARY: On April 16, 2012 the City Council formed Community Facilities District No. 2012-1 (Singleton Heights) (“CFD”) for the purpose of providing a secure revenue source for certain authorized facilities and services.

Approval of the CFD special tax levy for fiscal year 2022/2023 will provide the amounts required to pay annual debt service on outstanding Special Tax Bonds, fund facilities and services, and administrative expenses of the CFD. In order to meet the financial requirements of the CFD in fiscal year 2022/2023, special taxes are proposed to be levied on Developed Property and Undeveloped Property as defined in the Rate and Method of Apportionment (“RMA”). Developed Property are parcels for which a building permit was issued as of April 1, 2022 and represent 121 Residential Units in Improvement Area (“IA”) No.1 and 147 Residential Units in IA No. 2. In order to meet the needs of the CFD, it is proposed that Special Tax A (Facilities) be levied at approximately 96% of the maximum rate in IA No. 1 for Developed Property and in IA No. 2 89% of the maximum rate on Developed Property. Special Tax B (Services) be levied at approximately 82% of the maximum rate for Developed Property in both IA 1 and IA 2.

FISCAL IMPACT: If the Council approves the CFD special tax levy for FY 2022/2023 it will provide approximately $404,661 to fund the repayment of debt service and pay for administrative costs associated with in IA No. 1 and IA No. 2 of the CFD and $206,468 to fund the authorized services within IA No. 1 and IA No. 2 of the CFD, assuming there are no delinquencies. The FY 2022/2023 levy amount is based on levying at the applicable FY 2022/2023 Special Taxes rates listed in Exhibit “A” of the Resolution. The Maximum Special Tax A Rates for facilities may escalate at two percent (2.0%) per year and the Maximum Special Tax B Rates for services may escalate by the greater of two percent (2.0%) or the increase in the Consumer Price Index per fiscal year (from April to April).

Since the change in CPI was 7.87%, the proposed Maximum Special Tax Rates have been increased by 7.87%.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A: Resolution No. 2022-33