Regular Meeting of the Calimesa City Council
Monday, October 17, 2022
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: MAYOR DAVIS, MAYOR PRO TEM CERVANTEZ, COUNCIL MEMBER DUVALL, COUNCIL MEMBER HEWITT AND COUNCIL MEMBER MOLINA.
STAFF: CITY MANAGER JOHNSON, CITY ATTORNEY BARROW, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
BENSON, FINANCE DIRECTOR REID, PLANNING DIRECTOR LUCIA, PUBLIC
WORKS DIRECTOR MONSON, CITY ENGINEER THORNTON, FIRE CHIEF O’CONNELL AND SHERIFF CAPTAIN SALAS.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Anyone wishing to address the Council on any item within the Council’s jurisdiction that is not on the agenda may do so at this time. This is not a time for City Council discussion of non-agenda items. After receiving public comments, Council Members, or staff, after being recognized by the Mayor, may briefly respond to statements made by the public or questions posed by the public. In addition, Council Members may ask questions for clarification or make a referral to staff for factual information to be reported back to the Council at a later meeting.
Regular Meeting of the Calimesa City Council
Meeting Agenda
Monday, October 17, 2022 – 6:00 p.m.
Norton Younglove Multipurpose Senior Center
908 Park Avenue, Calimesa, CA 92320
William Davis, Mayor Jeff Cervantez, Mayor Pro Tem
Wynona Duvall, Council Member Wendy Hewitt, Council Member Linda Molina, Council Member Bonnie Johnson, City Manager Quinn Barrow, City Attorney The Calimesa City Council will be conducting this meeting in the Norton Younglove Senior Center. Members of the public may participate in this meeting in one of two ways:
1) In person at the Norton Younglove Senior Center, 908 Park Avenue, Calimesa, CA 92320. 2) By viewing the meeting on Facebook Live, beginning at 6:00 p.m. at https://www.facebook.com/cityof.calimesa Submission of Public Comments: If attending the meeting, public comment will be allowed by completing a speaker slip and providing it to the City Clerk at the meeting. Please observe a time limit of three (3) minutes when giving your presentation. When called upon, please step forward to the microphone, state your name for the record, whom you represent and any statement you wish to make. Please be advised that you may not defer your three (3) minutes to another speaker. Otherwise, public comment will be accepted via email. Please send comments via email to the Calimesa City Clerk at [email protected]. Identify public comment or the specific agenda item you wish to comment on in your email’s subject line. You may submit comments on any agenda item. Emailed comments must be submitted by 5:30 p.m. on Monday, October 17, 2022 and will be read into the record by the City Clerk. Electronic comments on agenda items may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Clerk’s Office, (909) 795-9801. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. Any public writings distributed by the City to at least a majority of the Council Members regarding any item on this regular meeting agenda will be made available at the public counter at City Hall located at 908 Park Avenue, Calimesa, CA 92320.
Regular Meeting of the Calimesa City Council
Monday, October 17, 2022
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
RECOMMENDATION: Move to approve the agenda
Motion________________________ Second_______________________ Vote___________________________ CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 – 9)
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. Any Council Member or staff member may request removal of an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
1. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION MINUTES.
a) City Council action minutes of a regular meeting of October 3, 2022 b) City Council action minutes of a special meeting of October 7, 2022.
2. RECEIVE AND FILE CITY COMMISSION & BOARD MINUTES.
a) Library Commission action minutes of a regular meeting of September 6, 2022
3. APPROVAL OF WARRANT REGISTERS.
a) Check Register Report with a total of $130,479.55 (Check Nos. 39306 to 39360) b) October 1, 2022 Council Payroll of $1,673.25
October 13, 2022 Payroll of $83,366.54
4. WAIVE FULL READING OF ANY PROPOSED ORDINANCES ON THE AGENDA.
This permits reading the title only in lieu of reciting the entire text of the Ordinances. This does not take policy action on the Ordinances or approve or disapprove any Ordinances on the agenda.
5. TRAVEL EXPENSES
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council move to approve the Council Travel Training and Meeting/Mileage Expenses Report through September 30, 2022.
6. 2
ND READING ORDINANCE 384 - ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT (ZTA) 22-03 TO AMEND THE CALIMESA MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE 18.25.030 TO CONDITIONALLY ALLOW TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (“CN”) ZONE AND CALIMESA MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE 18.30.030 TO CONDITIONALLY ALLOW TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (“LI”) AND BUSINESS PARK (“BP”) ZONES.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve second reading by title only and adopt Ordinance No. 384 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT 2022-03, AMENDING CALIMESA MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE 18.25.030 TO CONDITIONALLY ALLOW TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (“CN”) ZONE AND CALIMESA MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE 18.30.030 TO CONDITIONALLY ALLOW TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (“LI”) AND BUSINESS PARK (“BP”) ZONES; AND FIND THAT ADOPTION OF
THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
Regular Meeting of the Calimesa City Council
Monday, October 17, 2022
7. 2
ND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 383 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CALIMESA, CALIFORNIA REGARDING USE OF STREETS FOR STORAGE OF
VEHICLES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AMENDING THE CALIMESA MUNICIPAL
CODE REGARDING THE SAME, AND APPROVING CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT EXEMPTIONS.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve second reading by title only and adopt Ordinance No. 383 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA,
CALIFORNIA REGARDING USE OF STREETS FOR STORAGE OF VEHICLES IN THE PUBLIC
RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AMENDING THE CALIMESA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE SAME, AND
APPROVING CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT EXEMPTIONS
8. EXTENSION OF THE ADOPTED ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY CONCERNING COVID-19 SUPPLEMENTAL PAID SICK LEAVE (“SPSL”) UNDER LABOR CODE SECTION 248.6 and 248.7.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-59, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Calimesa, California amending the adopted Administrative Policy concerning COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave (“SPSL”) under Labor Code Section 248.6 and 248.7 and rescinding and replacing Resolution No. 2022-09.
9. APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR CDBG FUNDS
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the supplemental agreement for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for fiscal year 2022-2023.
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPORTS
POLICE CHIEF COMMENTS & REPORTS
FIRE CHIEF COMMENTS & REPORTS
MAYOR & COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTING OF COUNTY & REGIONAL MEETINGS This is the time for comments, announcements and/or reports on meetings attended at public expense as required by AB 1234.
BUSINESS ITEMS
10. APPROVE THE TRANSFER OF CDBG HOME REHABILITATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the transfer of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Home Rehabilitation Program management from the State of California to the County of Riverside and approve the reuse of CDBG Home Rehabilitation Grant program income to any CDBG eligible purpose.
11. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF SUPPORT LETTERS FOR COACHELLA VALLEY RAIL PROJECT GRANT OPPORTUNITIES.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the letters of support at the request of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) regarding the Coachella Valley Rail Project and provide the City Manager direction.
Regular Meeting of the Calimesa City Council
Monday, October 17, 2022
12. BUENA MESA DRIVE – PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council take the following actions:
1. Authorize the City Manager to develop and execute an agreement with Yucaipa Valley Water District (YVWD) – YVWD will rehabilitate the existing pavement along Buena Mesa Drive from Mesa Grande Drive to the Mastercraft Development project boundary.
The City will compensate YVWD in the amount of $178,177.
2. Adopt Resolution 2022-60, Resolution of the City of Calimesa City Council Amending the fiscal year 2022-23 budget to appropriate $178,177 from the second tranche of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding to cover the cost of Buena Mesa Drive Pavement Rehabilitation.
COUNCIL MEMBERS’ COMMENTS & REPORTS
This is the time for additional general comments, announcements, reports on meetings attended at public expense as required by AB 1234, requests of staff, and other issues of concern to Council Members may be presented briefly at this time. The Council may not legally take action on any item presented at this time other than to direct staff to investigate a complaint or place an item on a future agenda unless (1) by a majority vote, the Council determines that an emergency situation exists, as defined by Government Code § 54956.5 or (2) by a four-fifths vote, the Council determines that there is a need for immediate action and the need for action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted as required by Government Code § 54954.2(b).
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS & REPORTS
CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Government Code Section 54956.8:
Property: 625 W. County Line Road, Calimesa 92320
Agency negotiators: City Manager Bonnie Johnson and City Attorney Quinn Barrow Negotiating parties: Troyce Lee Gayle , Jr., Administrator of Estate of Troyce Lee Gayle and Edward B.
Fischel, LL.M, attorney for Administrator. Under negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment.
B. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
Title: City Manager
C. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
Title: City Manager
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of the City Council on Monday, November 7, 2022 at 6:00 p.m.
City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 1
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
MEETING DATE: October 17, 2022
PREPARED BY: Darlene Gerdes, Deputy City Manager/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the action minutes as presented for the Regular City Council Meeting of October 3, 2022 and the Special City Council Meeting of October 7, 2022.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: City Council action minutes of October 3, 2022 regular meeting.
Attachment B: City Council action minutes of October 7, 2022 special meeting.
City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 2
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
MEETING DATE: October 17, 2022
PREPARED BY: Darlene Gerdes, Deputy City Manager/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the action minutes as presented for the September 6, 2022 Library Commission regular meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Library Commission action minutes of September 6, 2022 regular meeting.
City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 3
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANT REGISTER
MEETING DATE: October 17, 2022
PREPARED BY: Celeste Reid, Finance Director
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Warrant Register as presented.
SUMMARY: The attached Check Register Report for City Council’s approval is as follows:
a) Check Register Report with a total of $130,479.55 (Check Nos. 39306 - 39360) b) October 1, 2022 Council Payroll of $1,673.25
October 13, 2022 Payroll of $83,366.54
City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 4
SUBJECT: WAIVE FULL READING OF ANY PROPOSED ORDINANCES ON
THE AGENDA
MEETING DATE: October 17, 2022
PREPARED BY: Darlene Gerdes, Deputy City Manager/City Clerk This permits reading the title only in lieu of reciting the entire text of the ordinances. This does not take
policy action on the Ordinances or approve or
disapprove any Ordinances on the agenda.
City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 5
SUBJECT: COUNCIL TRAVEL, TRAINING AND MEETING/MILEAGE
EXPENSES
MEETING DATE: October 17, 2022
PREPARED BY: Darlene Gerdes, Deputy City Manager/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Council Travel, Training and Meeting/Mileage Expenses Report through September 30, 2022.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Council Travel, Training and Meeting/Mileage Expenses Report through September 30, 2022.
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
COUNCIL TRAVEL AND MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
ATTACHMENT 5A
MEETING/MILEAGE 01-1100-7590
DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
August 18th Yucaipa State of the City $ 55.00
TOTAL TRAVEL/TRAINING $ - TOTAL MEETING/MILEAGE $ 55.00 REMAINING BALANCE $ 1,450.00 REMAINING BALANCE $ 545.00 MEETING/MILEAGE 01-1100-7590
DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
August 18th Yucaipa State of the City $ 55.00
TOTAL TRAVEL/TRAINING $ - TOTAL MEETING/MILEAGE $ 55.00 REMAINING BALANCE $ 1,450.00 REMAINING BALANCE $ 545.00
JEFF CERVANTEZ TRAVEL - MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
TRAVEL/TRAINING 01-1100-7585
WENDY HEWITT TRAVEL - MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
TRAVEL/TRAINING 01-1100-7585
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
COUNCIL TRAVEL AND MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
ATTACHMENT 5A
MEETING/MILEAGE 01-1100-7590
DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
TOTAL TRAVEL/TRAINING $ - TOTAL MEETING/MILEAGE $ -
REMAINING BALANCE $ 1,900.00 REMAINING BALANCE $ 600.00 MEETING/MILEAGE 01-1100-7590
DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
Sep 7-9 LOCC Conference Hotel Residence Inn $ 608.16 August 18th Yucaipa State of the City $ 55.00 24-Sep Beaumont State of the City $ 65.00
TOTAL TRAVEL/TRAINING $ 608.16 TOTAL MEETING/MILEAGE $ 120.00 REMAINING BALANCE $ 841.84 REMAINING BALANCE $ 480.00
LINDA MOLINA TRAVEL - MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
TRAVEL/TRAINING 01-1100-7585
BILL DAVIS TRAVEL - MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
TRAVEL/TRAINING 01-1100-7585
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
COUNCIL TRAVEL AND MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
ATTACHMENT 5A
MEETING/MILEAGE 01-1100-7590
DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
Sep 7-9 LOCC Conference Hotel Westin $ 605.42 18-Aug Yucaipa State of the City $ 55.00 Sep 7-9 LOCC Conference Parking $ 15.00 24-Sep Beaumont State of the City $ 65.00 Sep 7-9 LOCC Conference Vehicle Fuel $ 31.21
TOTAL TRAVEL/TRAINING $ 651.63 TOTAL MEETING/MILEAGE $ 120.00 REMAINING BALANCE $ 798.37 REMAINING BALANCE $ 480.00
WYNONA DUVALL TRAVEL - MEETING/MILEAGE EXPENSES
TRAVEL/TRAINING 01-1100-7585
City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 6
SUBJECT: 2
ND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 384 - AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF CALIMESA ADOPTING THE “SUMMERWIND
RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN SP-1, AMENDMENT 3” (SPA 21-01)
MODIFYING LAND USE ACREAGES, LAND USE LOCATIONS,
PASEO ALIGNMENTS, REVISING LANDSCAPE SETBACKS
WHEN TWO ADJOINING PROPERTIES ARE COMBINED WITH
THE SAME LAND USE, AND PROVIDING ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEDURES FOR APPROVAL OF MINOR SIGNAGE AND
OPEN SPACE AMENITIES ON APPROXIMATELY 115-ACRES OF
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED A QUARTER MILE NORTH OF
CHERRY VALLEY ROAD TO A QUARTER MILE NORTH OF
SINGLETON ROAD
MEETING DATE: October 17, 2022
PREPARED BY: Darlene Gerdes, Deputy City Manager/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct 2nd reading by title only and adopt Ordinance No. 384 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT 2022-03, AMENDING CALIMESA MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE 18.25.030 TO CONDITIONALLY ALLOW TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (“CN”) ZONE AND CALIMESA MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE
18.30.030 TO CONDITIONALLY ALLOW TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (“LI”) AND BUSINESS PARK (“BP”) ZONES; AND FIND THAT ADOPTION OF THE
ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Ordinance No. 384
ORDINANCE NO. 384
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT 2022-03, AMENDING CALIMESA MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE 18.25.030 TO CONDITIONALLY ALLOW
TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL (“CN”) ZONE AND CALIMESA MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE
18.30.030 TO CONDITIONALLY ALLOW TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (“LI”) AND BUSINESS PARK (“BP”) ZONES; AND
FIND THAT ADOPTION OF THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT UNDER THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
WHEREAS, the City conditionally permits the construction and operation of wireless communication facilities subject to certain standards and regulations enumerated in Title 18 (Zoning, Land Use and Development Regulations) (“Zoning Code”) of the Calimesa Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2018, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) commenced issuance of a series of new rulemaking decisions/regulations that significantly limit state and local management of wireless telecommunications installations. The Telecommunications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B), preserves local government zoning authority as it relates to location, siting and aesthetics, but limits local regulations in three key ways: (1) a local ordinance may not unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services; (2) a local ordinance may not prohibit or effectively prohibit service; and (3) a local ordinance may not regulate based on environmental impacts from radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions; and
WHEREAS, Calimesa Municipal Code Table 18.25.030 – Uses Permitted Within Commercial Districts designates “Wireless Communication Facilities as “X – Prohibited” in the Neighborhood Commercial (CN) zoning district; and,
WHEREAS, Calimesa Municipal Code Table 18.30.030 – Uses Permitted Within Industrial Districts designates “Wireless Communication Facilities as “X – Prohibited” in the Light Industrial (LI) and Business Park (BP) zoning district; and, WHEREAS, the City’s ongoing commercial and residential development projects are inducing population growth and increasing local demand for telecommunications facilities Citywide, including in the Neighborhood Commercial (CN), the Light Industrial (LI) and Business Park (BP) zoning districts; and,
WHEREAS, adoption of this Ordinance will further align the City’s Zoning Code with goals and policies of the City’s General Plan by reducing land use restrictions on infrastructure siting for wireless communication facilities in non-residential areas to better serve new and existing residential, commercial and industrial development while balancing the benefits of advanced wireless service with the City’s local values; and
Attachment 6A
WHEREAS, on August 11, 2022, during a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 2022-08 recommending to the City Council the adoption of Ordinance 384 approving a CEQA Exemption and Zoning Text Amendment 22-03; and, WHEREAS, on August 26, 2022, the City gave public notice as required under Chapter
18.15.080 (Hearings and Appeals) of the Zoning Code, of the Calimesa Municipal Code by advertising in the News Mirror newspaper of the holding of a public hearing at which the CEQA Exemption and Zoning Text Amendment would be considered; and, WHEREAS, on the 19th day of September, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to, the proposed amendments, and at which time the City Council considered the CEQA Exemption and Zoning Text Amendment 2022-03.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The above recitals are all true and correct.
Section 2. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information included in the General Plan, Zoning Code and Staff Report for the Public Hearing and public testimony prior to taking action on the proposed Ordinance. This information is on file and available at the Community Development Department at Calimesa City Hall.
Section 3. The City Council finds that the proposed Ordinance is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. Applicable General Plan goals are identified below with a description of how the amendments to the Zoning Code relating to wireless communication facilities further the goals of the General Plan:
1. GOAL IPS-5: Plan and provide adequate infrastructure for all new development, including but not limited to, integrated infrastructure planning, financing, and implementation. The proposed Ordinance plans and provides adequate infrastructure for all new development, by reducing land use restrictions on infrastructure siting for wireless communication facilities in non-residential areas to better serve new and existing residential, commercial and industrial development.
2. GOAL LU-4: Commercial and industrial development that serves the needs of Calimesa and the surrounding area, provides local job opportunities, and creates a greater job/housing balance. The proposed Ordinance provides for the needs of Calimesa and the surrounding area, as reliable internet services are becoming increasingly important for residents, first responders and business as technology improves and data-intensive applications become more commonplace.
3. GOAL SUS-8: Support commercial development that serves local and regional needs.
The proposed Ordinance supports commercial development that serves local and regional needs, as it enhances the ability for wireless providers to propose new facilities that service the needs of the community, and the region, as Calimesa is located along Interstate 10, which is a critical freight and transportation route for the United States.
4. POLICY LU-30: Existing businesses shall be supported by providing investment in public infrastructure and attracting additional business and businesses and people to the corridor. The proposed Ordinance provides investment in public infrastructure by expanding areas in which wireless providers, which the Federal Communications Commission has identified as public utilities under Public Utilities Code Sections 216, 233 and 234, can propose to establish wireless communication facilities and provide fast reliable wireless communication service to the Downtown Business Corridor.
Section 4. The City Council has independently reviewed and considered the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and finds and determines that the adoption of Ordinance 384 and Zoning Text Amendment 22-03 is exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project is exempt from CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because the project is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The project only amends certain language within the Calimesa Municipal Code and modifies various allowable uses to harmonize the Calimesa Municipal Code with recently adopted regulations by the Federal Communications Commission. Any future project will be required to undergo an environmental assessment to identify and mitigate any potential impacts. Therefore, the project of and by itself does not result in any physical changes in the environment.
Section 5. Table 18.25.030 (Uses Permitted Within Commercial Districts) set forth in Section 18.25.030 (Use regulations for commercial districts) of Chapter 18.25 (Commercial Zone Districts) of Title 18 (Zoning, Land Use and Development Regulations) of the Calimesa Municipal Code, is hereby amended as follows, with all other uses and activities listed in Table
18.25.030 to remain the same (additions highlighted; deletions marked by strike-throughs):
“Table 18.25.030 – Uses Permitted Within Commercial Districts Use
Neighborhood
Commercial
(CN)
Community
Commercial
(CC)
Regional
Commercial
(CR)
Office
Professional
(OP)
Wireless Communication Facilities X C C C C”
Section 6. Table 18.30.030 (Uses Permitted Within Industrial Districts), set forth in Section 18.30.030 (Use regulations for industrial districts) of Chapter 18.30 (Industrial Zone Districts) of Title 18 (Zoning, Land Use and Development Regulations) of the Calimesa Municipal Code, is hereby amended as follows, with all other uses and activities listed in Table
18.30.030 to remain the same (additions highlighted):
“Table 18.30.030 – Uses Permitted Within Industrial Districts Use
Light Industrial
(LI)
Business Park
(BP)
E. Public/Quasi-Public Uses
Wireless Communication Facilities C C”
Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. The City Clerk is directed to certify to the enactment of this Ordinance and to cause this ordinance to be published and/or posted as required by law.
INTRODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this 3
rd day of October, 2022,
upon the following vote:
AYES: Cervantez, Davis, Duvall, Hewitt and Molina
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING this 17th day of October, 2022, upon the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
WILLIAM DAVIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
DARLENE GERDES, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
QUINN BARROW CITY ATTORNEY
City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 7
SUBJECT: 2
ND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 383 - AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA, CALIFORNIA
REGARDING USE OF STREETS FOR STORAGE OF VEHICLES
IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AMENDING THE CALIMESA
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE SAME, AND APPROVING
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT EXEMPTIONS
MEETING DATE: October 17, 2022
PREPARED BY: Darlene Gerdes, Deputy City Manager/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct 2nd reading by title only and adopt Ordinance No. 383 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA, CALIFORNIA REGARDING USE OF STREETS FOR STORAGE OF VEHICLES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OFWAY, AMENDING THE CALIMESA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE SAME, AND
APPROVING CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT EXEMPTIONS ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Ordinance No. 383
ORDINANCE NO. 383
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA REGARDING USE
OF STREETS FOR STORAGE OF VEHICLES IN THE PUBLIC
RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AMENDING THE CALIMESA MUNICIPAL
CODE REGARDING THE SAME, AND APPROVING CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT EXEMPTIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings:
(a) The City of Calimesa has no adopted Ordinance regulating the storage of vehicles in the public rights-of-way.
(b) The Sheriff’s Department cannot remove stored or abandoned vehicles without a city ordinance in place.
(c) Riverside County and incorporated cities within the County have existing ordinances in place to regulate the use of public rights of way prohibiting the storage of vehicles. (d) The City currently regulates vehicles and traffic within the public rights-of-way pursuant to Sections 10.05.010 through 10.30.040 of Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Municipal Code.
(e) It is the intent of the City Council in adopting this Ordinance to establish consistent regulations governing use of streets for storage of vehicles in order to more fully protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
Section 2. A new Section 10.16.010 is hereby added to Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Calimesa Municipal Code to read as follows:
“10.16.010 Use of streets for storage of vehicles.
A. No person who owns or has possession, custody or control of any vehicle shall park such vehicle upon any street or alley for more than a consecutive period of seventy-two (72) hours.
B. In the event a vehicle is parked or left standing upon a street in excess of a consecutive period of seventy-two (72) hours, any authorized member of the police department may remove such vehicle from the street in the manner and subject to the requirements of the Vehicle Code of the state.
C. Whenever a peace officer or designated employee of the city suspects that a vehicle is in violation of this section, the peace officer or designated employee shall post a notice on the vehicle stating that the vehicle must be removed within seventy-two (72) hours of said notice, and if not removed by the date and time indicated on the notice, it will be removed at the owner's expense. The costs of such impoundment, towing and storage shall be charged to the owner of the vehicle and to the operator who committed the violation, if different from the owner of the vehicle.
D. For the purposes of this section, a parked or standing vehicle violates this section when the vehicle remains more than seventy-two (72) consecutive hours within two hundred (200) feet of any location where the peace officer or designated employee first posted or cited the Attachment 7A
vehicle. In investigating whether a vehicle is in violation of this section, the peace officer or designated employee shall consider the totality of the circumstances, including, but not limited to, tire markings, eyewitness account, dirt and debris, vegetation, vehicle condition, photographic evidence and odometer recordings.”
Section 3. Conflicting Code Provisions Superseded. The provisions of this Ordinance shall govern and supersede any conflicting provisions of the City of Calimesa Municipal Code with respect to the use of streets for storage of vehicles in public rights-of-way within the jurisdiction of the City of Calimesa.
Section 4. Environmental Determination. The City of Calimesa has determined that adoption of this Ordinance does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) because there is no potential that the regulations of vehicle parking imposed under this Ordinance will result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 because it has no potential for either a direct physical change to the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The City of Calimesa has also determined that even if the Ordinance comprises a project for CEQA analysis, it falls within the “common sense” CEQA exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where “it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.”
Section 5. Severability. If any sections, subsections, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision or legislation of any court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of preemptive legislation, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Chapter. The City Council declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more of the sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases thereof is declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 6. Signature, Publication and Certification. The Mayor shall sign, and the City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted and published in the manner required by law.
INTRODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this 3
rd day of October, 2022, upon
the following vote:
AYES: Cervantez, Davis, Duvall, Hewitt and Molina
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING this 17th day of October, 2022, upon the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
________________________________
WILLIAM DAVIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
DARLENE GERDES, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________________
QUINN BARROW, CITY ATTORNEY
City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 8
SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF THE ADOPTED ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY CONCERNING COVID-19 SUPPLEMENTAL PAID SICK LEAVE (“SPSL”) UNDER LABOR CODE SECTION 248.6 and 248.7.
MEETING DATE: October 17, 2022
PRESENTED BY: Darlene Gerdes, Deputy City Manager/City Clerk/HR Mgr.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-59, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Calimesa, California amending the adopted Administrative Policy concerning COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave (“SPSL”) under Labor Code Section 248.6 and 248.7 and rescinding and replacing Resolution No. 2022-09.
BACKGROUND: On February 9, 2022, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill (“SB”) 114 into law, which reauthorized COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave (“SPSL”), providing new paid leave entitlements to employees who are unable to work or telework due to a number of qualifying reasons related to COVID-19. The law becomes effective on February 19, 2022 and entitles qualified employees to SPSL retroactive to January 1, 2022 and through September 30, 2022.
On September 29, 2022 the Governor extended the policy and its provisions from September 30, 2022 to December 31, 2022. The City of Calimesa shall adopt this policy in order to provide its employees the SPSL to which they are entitled under Labor Code sections 248.6 and 248.7. The City of Calimesa has and will continue to fully and faithfully comply will all relevant and applicable requirements under the Labor Code.
The policy is effective immediately upon adoption, and the paid leave benefits provided herein shall be retroactive to January 1, 2022. Supplemental Paid Sick Leave (“SPSL”) benefits expire on December 31, 2022, except that the City of Calimesa will provide a Covered Employee who is on SPSL at the time of the expiration of such benefits the full amount of SPSL to which the Covered Employee would otherwise be entitled.
This policy was provided to all CIRA(formerly PARSAC) members for adoption and created by Liebert, Cassidy and Whitmore, Personnel Attorney’s for CIRA and the City of Calimesa.
FISCAL IMPACT: It is unclear what the fiscal impact will be and it is unlikely that the City will receive any funding to offset any costs that occur as a result of this policy.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Extension of the Administrative Policy Concerning COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave (“SPSL”) Under Labor Code Section 248.6 and 248.7.
Attachment B: Resolution No. 2022-59 adopting the extended policy
EXTENSION OF: Administrative Policy Concerning COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave (“SPSL”) Under Labor Code Sections 248.6 and 248.7
PREAMBLE
On February 9, 2022, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill (“SB”) 114 into law, which reauthorized COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave (“SPSL”), providing new paid leave entitlements to employees who are unable to work or telework due to a number of qualifying reasons related to COVID-19. The law became effective on February 19, 2022 and entitled qualified employees to SPSL retroactive to January 1, 2022 and through September 30, 2022.
The City of Calimesa adopted this policy on March 7, 2022 by Resolution No. 2022-09 in order to provide its employees the SPSL to which they are entitled under Labor Code sections 248.6 and 248.7. The City of Calimesa has fully and faithfully complied will all relevant and applicable requirements under the Labor Code.
EXTENSION OF POLICY
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 152 approved by the Governor on September 29, 2022 this policy and all its provisions have been extended from September 30, 2022 to December 31, 2022. This extension and all prior policy provisions are hereby approved by the City Council at their October 17, 2022 by Resolution No. 2022-59.
STATEMENT OF POLICY
This policy is intended to provide all eligible and qualified City of Calimesa employees with SPSL to which they are entitled under Labor Code sections 248.6 and 248.7.
The following policy sets forth certain rights and obligations regarding this leave.
COMPLIANCE
The City of Calimesa will fully and faithfully comply with Labor Code sections 248.6 and 248.7 in its administration of this policy.
DEFINITIONS
“Child” means a biological, adopted, or foster child, stepchild, legal ward, or a child to whom the employee stands in loco parentis. This definition of a child is applicable regardless of age or dependency status.
“Covered Employee” means any City of Calimesa employee who is unable to work or telework for the City of Calimesa for one or more of the reasons related to COVID-19 as set forth in this policy.
Attachment 8A
“COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave” or “SPSL” means paid sick leave pursuant to Labor Code sections 248.6 and 248.7.
“Family Member” means any of the following:
(i) A “child”, as defined above.
(ii) A biological, adoptive, or foster parent, stepparent, or legal guardian of an employee or the employee’s spouse or registered domestic partner, or a person who stood in loco parentis when the employee was a minor child. (iii) A spouse.
(iv) A registered domestic partner.
(v) A grandparent.
(vi) A grandchild.
(vii) A sibling.
“Firefighter” means an active firefighter employed by any of the following:
(i) A fire department of a city, county, city and county, district, or other public or municipal corporation or political subdivision.
(ii) A fire department of the University of California and the California State University.
(iii) The Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
(iv) A county forestry or firefighting department or unit. (v) A fire department that serves a United States Department of Defense installation and whose firefighters are certified by the United States Department of Defense as meeting its standards for firefighters.
(vi) A fire department that serves a National Aeronautics and Space Administration installation and that adheres to training standards established in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with § 13155) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 12 of the Health and Safety Code.
(vii) A fire department that provides fire protection to a commercial airport regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”).
(viii) Fire and rescue services coordinators who work for the Office of Emergency Services. For purposes of this clause, “fire and rescue services coordinators” means coordinators with any of the following job classifications: coordinator, senior coordinator, or chief coordinator.
POLICY
SCOPE OF COVERAGE:
This policy will apply to all Covered Employees employed by the City of Calimesa.
EFFECTIVE DATES:
The policy is effective immediately upon adoption, and the paid leave benefits provided herein shall be retroactive to January 1, 2022.
SPSL benefits expire after December 31, 2022, except that the City of Calimesa will provide a Covered Employee who is on SPSL at the time of the expiration of such benefits the full amount of SPSL to which the Covered Employee would otherwise be entitled.
Unless the underlying law is extended, this policy will expire by operation of the law after December 31, 2022, except that certain Covered Employees may continue to use SPSL after that date as described above.
EMPLOYEES ELIGIBLE FOR SPSL:
All City of Calimesa Covered Employees are eligible for SPSL if they are unable to work or telework for one or more of the enumerated reasons related to COVID-19 as provided below.
QUALIFYING REASONS FOR SPSL:
A Covered Employee qualifies for SPSL if they are unable to work or telework for one or more of the following reasons:
1) The employee is subject to a quarantine or isolation period related to COVID-19 as defined by an order or guidelines of the California Department of Public Health (“CDPH”), the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”), or a local health officer who has jurisdiction over the workplace; 2) The employee has been advised by a health care provider to self-quarantine due to COVID-19;
3) The covered employee is attending an appointment for themselves or a family member to receive a vaccine or a vaccine booster for protection against COVID-19; 4) The covered employee is experiencing symptoms, or caring for a family member experiencing symptoms, related to a COVID-19 vaccine or vaccine booster that prevent the employee from being able to work or telework; 5) The covered employee is experiencing symptoms of COVID-19 and seeking a medical diagnosis;
6) The covered employee is caring for a family member who:
a) Is subject to a CDPH, CDC, or local health officer order or guidance to isolate or quarantine, or
b) Has been advised by a health care provider to isolate or quarantine;
7) The covered employee is caring for a child whose school or place of care is closed or otherwise unavailable for reasons related to COVID-19 on the premises; or 8) The covered employee, or a family member for whom the covered employee is providing care, tests positive for COVID-19.
If an employee requests SPSL for reason 8, the City of Calimesa may require that the employee provide the positive test result to confirm that the employee qualifies for such leave. The City of Calimesa may also require that the employee provide the family member’s positive test result if the employee is requesting leave in order to provide care to a covered family member.
The City of Calimesa may also require an employee who has taken SPSL for qualifying reason 8 to test for COVID-19 on or after day five, following the initial positive test. If the City of Calimesa requires such a test, the City of Calimesa will provide the test at no cost to the employee.
AMOUNT OF SPSL FOR QUALIFYING REASONS 1 - 7:
1) Leave taken as SPSL is in addition to any other statutory and/or contractual leave to which the employee is otherwise entitled, and which is not specific to COVID-19. 2) Employees who worked at least 40 hours per week in the two weeks before they take SPSL, or who the employer considers to be full-time employees, are entitled to 40 hours of SPSL for qualifying reasons 1 through 7, above.
3) Firefighters who were scheduled to work more than 40 hours in the workweek before they take SPSL are entitled to the amount of SPSL equal to the “total number of hours that the covered employee was scheduled to work for the employer in that workweek,” which may exceed 40 hours, for qualifying reasons 1 through 7. 4) Part-time Covered Employees are entitled to SPSL in the following amounts:
a) If the part-time Covered Employee has a normal weekly schedule, the total number of hours the Covered Employee is normally scheduled to work for the City of Calimesa over one week for qualifying reasons 1 through 7; or b) If the part-time Covered Employee works a variable number of hours, the Covered Employee is entitled to 7 times the average number of hours the Covered Employee worked each day for the City of Calimesa in the six (6) months preceding the date the Covered Employee took SPSL. If the employee has worked for the City of Calimesa fewer than six months, then the employer calculates the average hours worked for the entire employment period and multiplies the daily average by seven. If an employee works variable hours and has only worked for the City of Calimesa seven days or fewer, then the employee receives an amount of SPSL equivalent to the total number of hours worked for the employer.
AMOUNT OF SPSL FOR QUALIFYING REASON 8:
Employees taking additional COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave under qualifying reason 8 are entitled to an amount not to exceed that which the employee received under qualifying reasons 1-7.
Covered Employees may determine how many hours of SPSL to use based upon a qualifying reason, up to the total number of hours to which the Covered Employee is entitled.
If a Covered Employee is provided SPSL retroactively for qualifying leave before adoption of this policy, the City of Calimesa will count the retroactive SPSL provided against the SPSL to which the Covered Employee is entitled.
For Covered Employees that request retroactive SPSL, the City of Calimesa will request that the employee sign a “COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Acknowledgment,” acknowledging the accuracy of the amount of leave designated retroactively.
COMPENSATION WHILE ON SPSL:
Covered Employees are entitled to compensation for SPSL at their regular rate of pay or the employee’s total wages less any overtime premium pay, including pursuant to any applicable collective bargaining agreement, subject to a cap of $511 per day and $5,110 in the aggregate.
EMPLOYEE NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL PAID SICK LEAVE:
Covered Employees must notify the City of Calimesa that they intend to take SPSL. The Covered Employee may provide such notice either orally or in writing to their immediate supervisor.
EMPLOYEE STATUS WHILE ON LEAVE:
The City of Calimesa will compensate Covered Employees who use SPSL according to the manner described in this policy and will otherwise treat Covered Employees who use COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick as if they are using paid sick leave according to the City of Calimesa’s Personnel Rules and Regulations.
EMPLOYEE OBLIGATIONS FOR REQUESTING RETROACTIVE PAYMENTS FOR PRIOR LEAVE THAT QUALIFIED AS SPSL:
Employees are entitled to SPSL retroactive to January 1, 2022.
If the City of Calimesa did not compensate the employee for leave that would otherwise have qualified as SPSL between January 1, 2022 and the effective date of this policy, in an amount equal to or greater to what the employee would have been entitled to under this policy, the employee is eligible for a retroactive payment from the City of Calimesa for such leave.
In order to receive payment for such leave, employees must make an oral or written request to be paid for such leave to the City of Calimesa’s Human Resources Department.
For any such retroactive payment, the number of hours of leave corresponding to the amount of the retroactive payment shall count towards the total number of hours of SPSL that the employer is required to provide to the Covered Employee.
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CALIMESA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING AN ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
CONCERING COVID-19 SUPPLEMENTAL PAID SICK LEAVE
(“SPSL”) UNDER LABOR CODE SECTION 248.6 and 248.7 AND
RESCINDING AND REPLACING RESOLUTION NO. 2022-09
WHEREAS, On February 9, 2022, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill (“SB”) 114 into law, which reauthorized COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave (“SPSL”), providing new paid leave entitlements to employees who are unable to work or telework due to a number of qualifying reasons related to COVID-19; and
WHEREAS, The City of Calimesa on March 7, 2022 adopted Resolution No. 2022-09 adopting this policy in order to provide qualified employees the SPSL to which they are entitled and to otherwise comply will all relevant and applicable requirements provided under Labor Code § 248.6 and 248.7; and
WHEREAS, On September 29, 2022 the Governor extended the policy and its provisions from September 30, 2022 to December 31, 2022; and WHEREAS, The City of Calimesa has and will continue to fully and faithfully comply with Labor Code § 248.6 and 248.7 in its administration of this policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Administrative Policy Concerning COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave (“SPSL”) Under Labor Code Section 248.6 and 248.7 attached as Exhibit “A” are approved and adopted for all City employees, except as otherwise expressly provided therein.
Section 2. That the policy is effective immediately upon adoption, and the paid leave benefits provided herein shall be retroactive to January 1, 2022. Supplemental Paid Sick Leave (“SPSL”) benefits expire on December 31, 2022, except that the City of Calimesa will provide a Covered Employee who is on SPSL at the time of the expiration of such benefits the full amount of SPSL to which the Covered Employee would otherwise be entitled.
Section 3. The City Manager or their designee is hereby directed to prepare and implement agreements, forms and other documents in order to effectuate the administrative policy attached as Exhibit “A.”
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17
th day of October 2022.
________________________________
WILLIAM DAVIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
DARLENE GERDES, CITY CLERK
Attachment 8B
City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR CDBG
FUNDS
MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2022
PREPARED BY: Bonnie Johnson, City Manager
Margaret Monson, Director of Public Works
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the supplemental agreement for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for fiscal year 2022-2023.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: At the September 7, 2021 Council meeting, Council approved an application to CDBG for the Norton Younglove Senior Center ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) Improvement Project, Phase II. The project will improve the ADA sidewalk access, path of travel to the Senior Center, City Hall and Community Development Annex building in accordance with the City’s ADA Transition Plan. The project also will provide additional parking for scheduled Senior Center events.
County of Riverside Housing, Homeless Prevention and Workforce Solutions (HHPWS) issued an award letter on July 5, 2022, for $31,931 for the Project. On September 29, HHPWS requested execution of the supplemental agreement for the Project.
FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. Once the project goes out to bid, staff will return with a contract award and funding plan. The 2022-23 budget will be amended at that time.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Letter from County Riverside dated September 29, 2022 Attachment B: Supplemental Agreement for CDBG
Attachment C: Award letter dated July 5, 2022
Attachment D: Senior Center Site Plan
Attachment 9A
Attachment 9B
Attachment 9C
Attachment 9D
City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 10
SUBJECT: APPROVE THE TRANSFER OF CDBG HOME REHABILITATION
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
MEETING DATE: October 17, 2022
PREPARED BY: Bonnie Johnson, City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the transfer of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Home Rehabilitation Program management from the State of California to the County of Riverside and approve the reuse of CDBG Home Rehabilitation Grant program income to any CDBG eligible purpose.
BACKGROUND: The City Council approved entering into a grant agreement with Resolution 2015- 08 for a CDBG Housing Rehabilitation program for Calimesa residents. The CDGB grant funds provided loans to Calimesa residents with income-eligible households for home rehabilitation. The loan proceeds were used for home rehabilitations that included upgrades for roofs, electrical and plumbing systems, carbon monoxide detectors, ADA improvements, and energy efficient measures.
The outstanding loans due to be repaid to the City as of September 30, 2022, totals $374,290.
Program income is recognized through the loan repayments and may be loaned to other Calimesa residents with income eligible households.
The City of Calimesa for several years has contracted with a consultant, Michael Baker International, to manage the loan program with respect to income eligibility verification, the management and documentation of construction contracts and rehabilitations. The consultant has recently contacted the City and informed the City Manager, Micheal Baker International will no longer provide services in this capacity for the management of the loan rehabilitation programs for the City of Calimesa.
The City entered into a cooperation agreement with Riverside County Urban County’s program in November 2020 and as such, transitioned from a Non-Entitlement User (NEU) program to a CDBG Entitlement program. Due to this transition to from an NEU to an Entitlement City, the City of Calimesa may no longer directly contract with the State of California for the CDBG home rehabilitation grant as detailed above as the City is now an Entitlement City. As an Entitlement City, the City will receive an annual CDBG allocation from the County as opposed to be eligible to compete for stand-alone grants.
DISCUSSION: The State of California’s Housing & Community Development contacted the City of Calimesa and provided three options with respect to the CDBG funding and how the repayment of loans, considered program income may be used. The options are as follows:
1) Return the loan repayments program income to the State of California for state officials to redirect the funding. The funds will be given to the State for repurpose and will not directly benefit the City of Calimesa.
2) The City Council may repurpose the grant and forgive the outstanding loan balance to the respective residents with outstanding loans and convert the loans to grants. 3) Transfer loan repayment program income directly to County of Riverside. With this action, the funds will directly benefit the City of Calimesa and residents. The funds may continue to be used for housing rehabilitation loan programs or transitioned for other CDBG eligible purposes including, perhaps, ADA Improvements throughout the City of Calimesa.
Staff respectfully recommends the City Council select the transfer of loan repayment program income to the County of Riverside and transition the use of the funds from home loan rehabilitation to the use for an eligible CDBG purpose. Staff recommends this option as this provides direct funding back to the City of Calimesa and will be of direct befit to our community.
FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Calimesa will have additional CDBG funding available of $374,290 in the future for use for eligible CDBG projects such as continuing ADA improvements.
ATTACHMENTS: None
City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 11
SUBJECT: COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF SUPPORT LETTERS FOR
COACHELLA VALLEY RAIL PROJECT GRANT OPPORTUNITIES
MEETING DATE: October 17, 2022
PREPARED BY: Bonnie Johnson, City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the letters of support at the request of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) regarding the Coachella Valley Rail Project and provide the City Manager direction.
BACKGROUND: Council Member Molina, as the City’s representative to RCTC, made a request that these draft letters be placed on the agenda for Council consideration. RCTC staff supplied draft letters of support regarding the Coachella Valley Rail Project. The letters would be used in conjunction with State and Federal grant opportunities.
The draft letters of support from RCTC and a project factsheet are attached for Council review.
Also Please note that in July 2021, the City commented on the Project EIR. Those comments were generally favorable and supportive. The comment letter is attached for your reference and to provide more project background.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Coachella Valley Rail Factsheet
Attachment B: EIR Comment Letter – Coachella Valley Rail Project Attachment C: Draft support Letter for federal grant opportunity Attachment D: Draft support letter for State grant opportunity
Transformational
Daily intercity passenger rail service will transform the way southern California residents travel, creating a car-free, stress-free option between major destinations, from downtown lights to desert delights.
Regional Connections
Service will link L.A. Union Station and the Coachella Valley, connecting riders 144 miles across the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, and Riverside. CV Rail will connect communities with this new way to travel, enhancing the region’s quality of life.
RouteLength
SoCal Population
24 Million
San Gorgonio PassTravelers
160,000 / Day
Running TimeLos Angeles to Coachella Valley
By theNumbers
Economic Investment
The new service will expand the regional economy by opening travel options and connections to restaurants, resorts, concert venues, sports facilities, and commercial and retail centers across the southland. The proposed stations also offer a host of transit-oriented development opportunities.
Access & Equity
Inland communities are behind the state average and coastal regions in employment, income, and education levels. Daily service offers game-changing access to jobs and schools, creating equity in a region ORQJGHQLHGVXIƓFLHQWUHVRXUFHV Sustainability
Taking the train will combat climate change by reducing vehicle miles traveled. This project will explore low or zero emission locomotives. Seven of the nine proposed stations are in or near disadvantaged FRPPXQLWLHVZKLFKZLOOEHQHƓWQRWRQO\IURPDOWHUQDWLYHVWRWUDIƓFFKRNHGhighways, but also from better air quality and health conditions.
Tourism
The service will support tourism regionwide, from LA’s entertainment attractions to Orange County’s theme parks to Riverside County’s world-renowned festivals, bringing people together from around the globe.
Proposed Stations
Why Coachella Valley Rail?
California & Beyond
CV Rail makes up a large segment of Amtrak’s planned Tucson-Phoenix-Los Angeles corridor with connections to San Diego, Santa %DUEDUDWKH3DFLƓF1RUWKZHVWDQG$UL]RQD7KHVHJPHQWLVDQLPSRUWDQWelement of the Amtrak Connects US national initiative.
Population Growth
7KH,QODQG(PSLUHLVWKHIDVWHVWJURZLQJUHJLRQLQ&DOLIRUQLDDQGWKHƓIWKIDVWHVWgrowing region in the U.S. It is the only area of its size and population in California without daily intercity passenger rail service. More than 160,000 people travel through the San Gorgonio Pass each day, demonstrating a clear need for this alternative.
Inland Empire
Population
4.65 Million
CommissionSupported
ONT
LAX
SNA
PSP
HTRON
Riverside
Palm Springs
Los Angeles
Union Station
Fullerton
San Bernardino Montclair
Pomona
O
Ontario
10 10
15 5
5 5
15 10
10 215
215
210
405
605
405
405
710
110
105
210
210
215
74 74 74
73 79
79 79
62 60
60 91
55 57
71 1
1 1 2
22 18
86 111
243
241
241
133
Yucaipa
Running Springs Lake Arrowhead
Morongo
Valley
Palm Desert Indian
Wells
Thermal
Mecca
Desert Hot Springs
Thousand Palms
Fontana Colton
Moreno
Valley
Rialto
Cathedral City
La Quinta
Orange
Yorba
Linda
Long
Anaheim
Norwalk
Los Angeles
Corona
Placentia
Norco
Anaheim
Hills
Beach
Cherry Valley SAN GORGONIO PASS Calimesa
241
Orange
ORANGE
COUNTY
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
62 Springs
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
COACHELLA
VALLEY
Loma Linda
Redlands
Indio
Coachella
Mid Valley
247 189
138
111
P
111
Banning Beaumont
Pass Area
10 60
91 91
Rancho Mirage
Cabazon
- Preferred Route
- Existing Station
- Potential Station Area
LEGEND
Potential CV Rail Stations
Proposed Coachella Valley Rail Alignment
Attachment 11A
City of Calimesa
July 1, 2021
Sheldon Peterson
Riverside County Transportation Commission
P.O. Box 12008, Riverside California 92502
RE: Comments on the Coachella Valley - San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Service Tier 1/Program Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report Dear Mr. Peterson:
Thank you for providing the City of Calimesa the opportunity to review and comment on the Tier 1/Program Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for the Coachella Valley – San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Project (Project). The City strongly supports the Project and concurs with the analysis, conclusions, and mitigation measures contained in the Draft Program EIS/EIR.
The Project would extend approximately 144 miles between downtown Los Angeles and the Coachella Valley. The Project would utilize existing railroad tracks that primarily parallel Interstate 5, State Route 91, and Interstate 10. The Project would enhance access to four existing stations along the corridor and proposes development of five new rail stations over time. In addition, new tracks are proposed in strategic locations to improve travel speeds, minimize delays, and maintain safety.
The City believes the Project would result in numerous benefits, including but not limited, to the following:
• Reduced traffic volumes on corridor freeways: Figure 1-5 of the EIS/EIR identifies various segments of I-10, SR-60 and SR-91 that currently experience regular weekday congestion. The annual population is anticipated to continue to grow in Riverside County and San Bernardino County at a rate of 1.0 percent and 1.1 percent, respectively, through 2050 (EIS/EIR, page 1-27). As population in these counties increases, freeway congestion is anticipated to increase as well, as residents commute to employment centers. The EIS/EIR concludes that, upon implementation of the Project, auto trips would shift to intercity trips, thereby reducing vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled on regional highways. The anticipated reduction in vehicle trips and VMT would result in a reduction in air quality/greenhouse gas emissions associated with fuel combustion and improve safety on regional highways. In addition to a reduction in environmental effects, Attachment 11B
P. 2
July 1, 2021
908 Park Avenue ⬧ Calimesa, California 92320 ⬧ (909) 795-9801 drivers on regional freeways would benefit from reduced travel times due to decreased roadway congestion.
• Increased access to employment Opportunities: Improving connectivity to our passenger rail network is a major goal for our region, not only between existing and future rail services but also with local transit serving rail stations (SCAG 2021). The Project would provide a reliable mode of transportation for residents in more rural and suburban communities to access urban areas with more employment opportunities. Los Angeles is projected to remain the major employment center of the region (i.e., Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties) over the next 30 years, accounting for 60 percent of total employment opportunities. Extension of the passenger rail would provide access for residents, which may not have a reliable mode of transportation, to employment opportunities outside their existing communities, strengthening the overall regional work force and economy. • Access to tourist destinations and recreation opportunities along the corridor:
Visitors traveling to the Corridor’s many destinations including, but not limited to downtown areas; recreational facilities; art, history, and natural history museums; shopping destinations such as those in Cabazon; casinos and related entertainment venues; and special event generators, such as the annual Palm Springs Film Festival and the Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival held in Indio. The frequently severe congestion of the nearby serving the Project corridor would make intercity passenger rail an attractive alternative to automobile travel, particularly for visitors. In addition, passenger rail service would provide affordable transportation service to popular tourist destinations and recreational facilities for residents that do not own a private vehicle.
The City of Calimesa believes its residents could benefit greatly from implementation of the Project, but the City’s main concern is access to the rail stations. The closest potential new station proposed to the City of Calimesa would be sited in “The Pass Area,” between Beaumont and Cabazon. The City would prefer the station be located in Beaumont to provide opportunities for the City to coordinate feasible public transit options between the City and the future rail station. If “The Pass Area” station is sited further east near Cabazon, convenient public transit access to the station would not be feasible from the City of Calimesa.
Thank you in advance for your consideration of our comments. The City acknowledges that the Tier 1/Program EIS/EIR is a procedural planning document that evaluates the effects of implementing the passenger rail service from a regional context and broad areas of potential environmental effect associated with construction and operation of the Project. Once Tier 2 is initiated, the City looks forward to the opportunity to review the future project-level impact analysis for specific infrastructure improvements. When future environmental documentation associated with the Coachella Valley – San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Project, please send notice to Kelly Lucia, Planning Manager at 908 Park Avenue, Calimesa, CA 92320.
P. 2
July 1, 2021
908 Park Avenue ⬧ Calimesa, California 92320 ⬧ (909) 795-9801 If you have any questions or would like to discuss our recommendations, please contact Kelly Lucia at (909) 795-9801 ext. 229 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Kelly Lucia
Planning Manager, City of Calimesa
(909) 795-9801 ext. 229
[email protected].
References:
SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments). 2020. Final Connect SoCal Passenger Rail Technical Report. September 2, 2020.
City of Calimesa
908 Park Avenue, Calimesa, California 92320
Telephone 909.795.9801 Facsimile 909.795.4399
www.cityofcalimesa.net
“Preserving and enhancing the open space atmosphere and quality of life in Calimesa” October 18, 2022
Administrator Amit Bose
Federal Railroad Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
Washington, DC 20590
Subject: Support for the Coachella Valley Rail Project Application for Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI) Grant Funding Dear Administrator Bose:
On behalf of the City of Calimesa, the City Council is pleased to support the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Rail and Mass Transit’s $20 million grant application for the Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI) program for the Coachella Valley Rail (CV Rail) Tier II Project Approval and Environmental Documentation Project (Project).
The proposed CV Rail service extends approximately 144 miles between Los Angeles and the Coachella Valley with stops within Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, and Riverside counties.
This project is a once-in-a-generation project for inland southern California because it is:
✓ Transformational – Transforms the way Southern Californians will travel and interact ✓ Interconnected – Links Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside counties ✓ Equitable – Expands access to jobs and education for residents in disadvantaged communities ✓ Economically Driven – Connects and promotes regional and national commerce ✓ Sustainable – Combats climate change by reducing single-occupancy vehicle use The Service Development Plan (SDP) and National Environmental Policy Act/California Environmental Quality Act (NEPA/CEQA) Tier I environmental clearance for the corridor was completed and unanimously approved in July 2022 by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC). The NEPA/CEQA Tier II environmental study estimated at $60,000,000 is the next step toward fulfilling the transformational vision.
As a joint project between Caltrans, Federal Rail Administration, and RCTC—the local implementing agency—the grant award will fund:
• Preliminary engineering along the 76-mile eastern section of track to the 30% level; and Attachment 11C
• Project-level environmental clearance for up to six stations, a new third main track, and associated grade crossing and signal improvements on the eastern section of the corridor.
The State of California and RCTC have a vested interest in fostering equitable investments in transportation infrastructure and transit mobility, as well as in sustainable freight and goods movement. For this reason, both agencies are committed to providing matching funds for this game-changing project that benefits our economy, environment, and promotes equity in disadvantaged communities across the region.
We are proud to support this application and urge its award. CV Rail aligns with the goals of the CRISI program and will provide vital connections for a growing region. For questions regarding this letter of support, please contact Council Member Linda Molina at (909) 795-9801.
Sincerely,
William Davis, Mayor
City of Calimesa
908 Park Avenue, Calimesa, California 92320
Telephone 909.795.9801 Facsimile 909.795.4399
www.cityofcalimesa.net
“Preserving and enhancing the open space atmosphere and quality of life in Calimesa” October 18, 2022
The Honorable Lee Ann Eager
Chair
California Transportation Commission
1120 N Street, MS 52
Sacramento, California 95814
Re: Support for the Riverside County Transportation Commission Solutions for Congested Corridors and Local Partnership Grant Applications
Dear Chair Eager:
On behalf of the City of Calimesa, the City Council writes in strong support of Riverside County Transportation Commission’s (RCTC) Solutions for Congested Corridor Program (SCCP) and Local Partnership Program (LPP) grant applications to fund the Mid County Parkway Construction Contract 3 and Perris Valley Line Second Main Track Projects. The projects are vital components of RCTC’s vision to implement safe multimodal solutions in the rapidly growing communities of southwestern Riverside County and the San Jacinto Valley. Riverside County is the fastest growing county in California and the fifth fastest growing in the country, and these communities are ground zero for that growth.
The Mid County Parkway Construction Contract 3 and Perris Valley Second Main Track Projects will allow greater access to multimodal transportation options, provide safety improvements, and help improve air quality in our region. Project improvements include:
• Increased Commuter Rail Service – enabling increased Metrolink service frequency by double tracking stretches of the 91/Perris Valley Line along the Interstate (I)-215 corridor. • Improved Safety – reducing the high rate of collisions along dangerous stretches of Ramona Expressway by implementing safety improvements.
• Bolstered Access to Transit Service – strengthening arterial connections so San Jacinto Valley residents may better access the Metrolink 91/Perris Valley Line and other transit services.
Decades of underinvestment in transportation systems in these communities show in the congestion that residents must weather every day on the I-215 corridor and unsafe surface streets such as Ramona Expressway to access employment and education opportunities. The same residents must also compete in traffic with the nation’s agricultural and freight carriers, 40 Attachment 11D
percent of which travels through the Inland Empire region. Projects like these that provide safe, accessible, multimodal facilities are critical for these communities and businesses to thrive.
The Mid County Parkway Construction Contract 3 project aligns with long term planning goals of improving mobility options between the San Jacinto Valley and Perris Valley and improving access to employment centers, governmental services, and medical facilities in downtown Riverside and beyond. The project also leverages and supports the Metrolink Perris Valley Line Capacity Improvement Project, for which the State recently awarded $25 million to Metrolink, a partnership application with RCTC.
I am proud to support RCTC’s efforts to advance multimodal and safety projects in Riverside County. RCTC has already committed 59% of the $207 million needed to complete the projects.
As a Self-Help County, RCTC is not only eligible to receive these funds but has demonstrated a major commitment to invest in mobility solutions necessary for the prosperity of its constituents.
For these reasons, we support the award of these funds to RCTC for the Mid County Parkway Construction Contract 3/ Perris Valley Line Second Main Track Projects.
Thank you,
William Davis, Mayor
City Council Meeting
Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 12
SUBJECT: BUENA MESA DRIVE - PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
MEETING DATE: October 17, 2022
PREPARED BY: Bonnie Johnson, City Manager
Michael Thornton, City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Authorize the City Manager to develop and execute an agreement with Yucaipa Valley Water District (YVWD) – YVWD will rehabilitate the existing pavement along Buena Mesa Drive from Mesa Grande Drive to the Mastercraft Development project boundary. The City will compensate YVWD in the amount of $178,177.
2. Adopt Resolution 2022-60, Resolution of the City of Calimesa City Council Amending the fiscal year 2022-23 budget to appropriate $178,177 from the second tranche of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding to cover the cost of Buena Mesa Drive Pavement Rehabilitation.
DISCUSSION: On March 7, 2022, staff presented Pavement Management Program project including Mesa Grade Drive/Buena Mesa Drive project (estimated at $181,000 for Buena Mesa Drive). Council selected a series of projects for the ’22-’23 Pavement Rehabilitation Program; however, the Mesa Grande Drive/Buena Mesa Drive project was neither recommended by staff nor selected for rehabilitation by Council. It was not recommended because YVWD was planning a recycled water pipeline along Buena Mesa Drive. Staff recommended waiting until after the pipeline was complete before performing rehabilitation.
YVWD and its contractor began work on its pipeline in June/July. In August, YVWD began work along Buena Mesa Drive – a roadway that contained poor to very poor pavement conditions. YVWD and City staff began discussing pavement rehabilitation requirements for the roadway. YVWD is responsible for trench repair paving. City staff requested from YVWD a cost for reconstruction of the entire roadway. Pavement rehabilitation shall include pulverizing the upper 7-inches of existing pavement/native materials, remove 3-inches of the blended materials, compact 4-inches of the blended materials as sub-base, pave 3-inches of base pavement and overlay, 0.1-feet minimum, the entire street.
On October 5, 2022, YVWD provided the following data:
• Total length in Buena Mesa trenching = 1,790 linear feet
• YVWD cost for sawcut and trench base paving = 1,790 lf x $22/lf + $7,304 (extra work) = $46,684
• Cost for overlay per current contract: 1,790 lf x 12’ x $1/sf = $21,480 • Total cost of proposed street replacement: $199,657 (Borden new cost) + $46,684 = $246,341
• Cost to City: $178,177
• Cost to District: $68,164
Staff has confirmed that the costs are reasonable and recommends that the City complete the work.
Staff further recommends that Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with YVWD authorizing it to complete the rehabilitation work described above and permitting staff to compensate YVWD in the not to exceed amount of $178,177.
FISCAL IMPACT: The funding is not included in the current budget. Staff is requesting an additional appropriation from the second tranche of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding in the amount of $178,177. A budget adjustment will be prepared to reflect the expenditure in the ARPA Fund for $178,177, Street expenditure account (16-0000-8700) with respective revenue recognition of $178,177, Other Governmental Revenues account (16-0000-4800).
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Resolution 2022-60
RESOLUTION 2022-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET TO
APPROPRIATE $178,177 FROM THE SECOND TRANCHE OF
AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA) FUNDING TO COVER THE
COST OF BUENA MESA DRIVE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
WHEREAS, the City completed a Pavement Management Program, WHEREAS, Buena Mesa Drive was identified as a street requiring rehabilitation – it is in poor to very poor condition,
WHEREAS, Yucaipa Valley Water District (YVWD) completed construction of a recycled water pipeline along Buena Mesa Drive,
WHEREAS, YVWD is required to repair its trench,
WHEREAS, the City and YVWD desire to collaborate for pavement rehabilitation and trench repair,
WHEREAS, YVWD has provided a City cost of $178,177 for the City’s share of the roadway repair work, and
WHEREAS, City staff has determine that the cost for the City’s share is reasonable.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIMESA HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Fund for Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget is hereby amended as follows:
• Increase appropriations in account 16-0000-8700 by $178,177. • Increase revenue in account 16-0000-4800 by $178,177.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of October 2022. _____________________________________
WILLIAM DAVIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
DARLENE GERDES, CITY CLERK
Attachment 12A