Cities Index.
Agenda

Calistoga City Council
June 23, 2026

Document
Agenda
Meeting
June 23, 2026
Body
Calistoga City Council
Pages
182
Original file
19.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on calistoga.civicweb.net. That file is the official record.

- 5 - OAK #4890-2776-373v1 (Rev. 9/2021)
insurance listed below with insurers licensed to do business in the State of California and with a Best's rating of no less than A:VII.

A. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance providing bodily injury liability and property damage, to protect against all liability arising out of the use of any owned, leased, passenger or commercial automobile at a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit and $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall apply to hired and non-owned autos.

B. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Commercial General Liability Insurance, with limits providing a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage for each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate and $2,000,000 products/completed operations aggregate. The insurance shall cover all operations including but not limited to the following: (1) premises, operations and mobile equipment liability; (2) completed operations and products liability; (3) contractual liability insuring the obligations assumed by CONSULTANT in this Agreement; (4) broad form property damage liability; (5) personal injury liability endorsement, including death; and (6) automobile bodily injury and property damage insurance, including all owned, hired and non-owned equipment.

C. Professional Liability Insurance. Professional Liability Insurance protecting against liabilities arising out of or in connection with negligent acts, errors, or omissions of CONSULTANT and all of CONSULTANTS employees, subcontractors, consultants and other agency in connection with this Agreement, at a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage and $1,000,000 aggregate, on a "claims made basis" with a continuation of coverage extension for liabilities for two years from the date the Services are substantially complete. Such professional liability policies shall include coverage for liability assumed by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement.

D. Workers Compensation Insurance. Workers Compensation insurance, occupational disease insurance and employer’s liability insurance shall be required with minimum limits as required by law, covering all workplaces involved in this Agreement.

E. Sexual Abuse or Molestation (“SAM”) Liability: If the work will include contact with minors, and the Commercial General Liability policy under Section 5.3(B) is not endorsed to include affirmative coverage for sexual abuse or molestation, CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain a policy covering Sexual Abuse and Molestation with a limit no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim.

F. Policy Terms. Concurrently with execution of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide CITY with Certificates of Insurance evidencing that CONSULTANT has obtained or maintains the insurance required by this Section

5.3. The Certificates shall be on forms acceptable to CITY. CONSULTANT shall also furnish CITY with original endorsements with the following documentation:

Item #6.7.

Page 146 of 182 ends

- 6 - OAK #4890-2776-373v1 (Rev. 9/2021)
• Precluding cancellation or reduction in coverage before the expiration of thirty (30) days after CITY shall have received written notification thereof from CONSULTANT by United States mail;
• Providing that CONSULTANT's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, and include a “separation of insureds” or “severability” clause which treats each insured separately, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability (cross-liability endorsement);
• Excepting CONSULTANT’S professional liability insurance, naming CITY, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds (“Additional Insureds”); and • Providing that for any claims relating to CONSULTANT's services hereunder, CONSULTANT's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to CITY, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents, and that any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CITY for itself, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents shall be in excess of CONSULTANT's insurance and shall not be contributory with it.
• It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverages requirements and/or limits shall be available to the Additional Insured, including but not limited to any umbrella or excess insurance.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be the greater of:
(a) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (b) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured.

G. Waiver of Subrogation: CONSULTANT hereby grants to CITY a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said CONSULTANT may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.

CONSULTANT hereby agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not CITY has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. However, the Worker’s Compensation policy required by Section 5.3(D) of this Agreement shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY for all work performed by CONSULTANT, its employees and/or agents.

H. Material Breach. If CONSULTANT fails to maintain insurance coverage or provided insurance documentation which is required pursuant to this Agreement, it shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement. CITY, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement and obtain damages from CONSULTANT resulting from said breach. Alternatively, CITY may purchase the required insurance coverage, and without further notice to CONSULTANT, may deduct from sums due to CONSULTANT any premium costs advanced by CITY for such insurance. These remedies shall be in addition to any other remedies available to CITY.

Item #6.7.

Page 147 of 182 ends

- 7 - OAK #4890-2776-373v1 (Rev. 9/2021)
ARTICLE 6 - NOTICES
All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be personally delivered or sent by facsimile or reputable overnight courier and shall be deemed received upon the earlier of: (1) if personally delivered, the date of delivery to the address of the person to receive such notice; (2) if delivered by Federal Express or other overnight courier for next business day delivery, the next business day; (3) if sent by facsimile, with the original sent on the same day by overnight courier, the date on which the facsimile is received, provided it is before 5:00 P.M. Pacific Time; or (4) if sent electronically, the date of delivery on the confirmed read receipt. Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner described in this Article 6. Rejection or other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of a change in address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to constitute receipt of the notice or communication sent. Unless changed in accordance herewith, the addresses for notices given pursuant to this Agreement shall be as follows:

If to CITY: Mitchell J. Celaya III, City Manager
1232 Washington Street
Calistoga, CA 94515
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 707-942-2806
If to CONSULTANT: Jenny Ocon
1440 Spring Street
St. Helena, CA 94574
Phone: (707) 965-5010 ext. 200
Email: [email protected]
ARTICLE 7 - MISCELLANEOUS

7.1. Conflict of Interest Prohibition. CITY and CONSULTANT will comply with the requirements of the CITY’s Conflict of Interest Code adopted pursuant to California Government Code §87300 et seq., the Political Reform Act (California Government Code §81000 et seq.), the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission (Title 2, §18110 et seq. of the California Code of Regulations), California Government Code §1090 et seq., and any other ethics laws applicable to the performance of the Services and/or this Agreement. CONSULTANT may be required to file with the CITY Clerk a completed Form 700 before commencing performance of the Services unless the CITY Clerk determines that completion of a Form 700 is not required, pursuant to CITY’s Conflict of Interest Code. Form 700 forms are available from the CITY Clerk.

CONSULTANT may not perform Services for any other person or entity that, pursuant to any applicable law or regulation, would result in a conflict of interest or would otherwise be prohibited with respect to CONSULTANT’s obligations pursuant to this Agreement.

CONSULTANT agrees to cooperate fully with CITY and to provide any necessary and appropriate information requested by CITY or any authorized representative concerning potential conflicts of interest or prohibitions concerning CONSULTANT’s obligations Item #6.7.

Page 148 of 182 ends

- 8 - OAK #4890-2776-373v1 (Rev. 9/2021)
pursuant to this Agreement.

CONSULTANT may not employ any CITY official, officer or employee in the performance of the Services, nor may any official, officer or employee of CITY have any financial interest in this Agreement that would violate California Government Code §1090 et seq. CONSULTANT hereby warrants that it is not now, nor has it been in the previous twelve (12) months, an employee, agent, appointee, or official of CITY. If CONSULTANT was an employee, agent, appointee, or official of CITY in the previous twelve months, CONSULTANT warrants that it did not participate in any manner in the forming of this Agreement. CONSULTANT understands that, if this Agreement is made in violation of Government Code §1090 et seq., the entire Agreement is void and CONSULTANT will not be entitled to any compensation for CONSULTANT’s performance of the Services, including reimbursement of expenses, and CONSULTANT will be required to reimburse CITY for any sums paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement. CONSULTANT understands that, in addition to the foregoing, penalties for violating Government Code §1090 may include criminal prosecution and disqualification from holding public office in the State of California.

Any violation by CONSULTANT of the requirements of this provision will constitute a material breach of this Agreement, and the CITY reserves all its rights and remedies at law and equity concerning any such violations.

7.2. Subcontracting. CONSULTANT may subcontract portions of the Services upon the prior written approval of CITY. CONSULTANT will be solely responsible for payment of such subcontract Services. No contractual relationship will exist between any such subcontractors of CONSULTANT and CITY. CONSULTANT’s subcontractors agree to be bound to CONSULTANT and CITY in the same manner and to the same extent as CONSULTANT is bound to CITY under the Agreement. CONSULTANT’s subcontractors further agree to include the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, with any subsubcontractor to the extent they apply to the scope of the sub-subcontractor’s work. A copy of the CITY indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to CONSULTANT’s subcontractors upon request.

7.3. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of CITY and CONSULTANT as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This Agreement may only be modified by an amendment in writing signed by each party.

7.4. No Assignment. The Services are deemed unique and neither party shall assign, transfer, subcontract or otherwise substitute its interest in this Agreement or any of its obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other party. As limited by this Section

7.2, this Agreement is to be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

7.5. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is determined to be unconstitutional, invalid or beyond the authority of either party, such decision shall not affect the validity of the Item #6.7.

Page 149 of 182 ends

- 9 - OAK #4890-2776-373v1 (Rev. 9/2021)
remainder of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect, provided that the remainder of this Agreement can be interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the parties.

7.6. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and, when fully signed, such counterparts shall have the same effect as if signed in one document.

7.7. Choice of Law. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without reference to its choice of laws principles and venue shall be in the appropriate court in Napa County, California.

7.8. Waiver. No failure on the part of either Party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder. A waiver by either CITY or CONSULTANT of any breach of this Agreement shall not be binding upon the waiving party unless such waiver is in writing. In the event of a written waiver, such a waiver shall not affect the waiving party's rights with respect to any other further breach.

7.9. Mediation. In the event the parties are unable to resolve a dispute arising under this Agreement through good faith negotiations, the parties agree to submit the matter to mediation with a mutually agreeable mediator. Prior to the mediation, the parties shall exchange any documents reasonably necessary to resolve the matter to be mediated.

7.10. Interpretation. In the event this Agreement is ever construed in any dispute between the parties, it and each of its provisions shall be construed without regard to the party or parties responsible for its preparation and shall be deemed to have been prepared jointly by the parties. The rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement.

7.11. Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of one of the parties represents that he or she is duly authorized to sign and deliver the Agreement on behalf of such party and that this Agreement is binding on such party in accordance with its terms.

7.12. Third Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with, or cause of action in favor of, a third party against either the CITY or CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT’s Services hereunder are being performed solely for the benefit of CITY. CITY shall be an express third-party beneficiary of all contracts between CONSULTANT and any subcontractors or subconsultants in connection with any services performed in connection with, or in furtherance of, this Agreement. * * *
[Signatures on Next Page]
Item #6.7.

Page 150 of 182 ends

- 10 - OAK #4890-2776-373v1 (Rev. 9/2021)
Item #6.7.

Page 151 of 182 ends

- 11 - OAK #4890-2776-373v1 (Rev. 9/2021)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above.

CITY OF CALISTOGA
By: Date:

Mitchell J. Celaya III, City Manager

CONSULTANT
By: Date:

Jenny Ocon, Executive Director
By: Date:

Attest
By:

Yudiana Galvan, City Clerk
Approved As To Form
By:

Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney
18/06/2026
Item #6.7.

Page 152 of 182 ends

OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF WORK
UpValley Family Centers (UVFC) is excited to assist the City of Calistoga in providing Water/Wastewater financial assistance for qualifying single-family residential, multi-family residential, and mobile home park accounts. The program is designed to assist low-income Calistoga residents who are having difficulty paying for their water/wastewater bills or for bills that are delinquent.

The Consultant (UVFC) shall provide the following services and deliverable documents to the City, subject to the approval of the City’s authorized representative:
• Update program guidelines, program eligibility requirements, application process, and funding determination criteria.
• Develop program applications both in English and Spanish. • Marketing/advertisement of the Water/Wastewater Financial Assistance pilot program to Calistoga residents who are billed for Water/Wastewater services. • Provide the City of Calistoga Finance Account Payables department a list of water customers who qualify for the assistance program, with recommendations for which subsidy they are eligible to receive.
• Track applications received, applications that meet the eligibility criteria, and which applicant received which program subsidy.
• Provide the city reports on program results, including but not limited to the number of applications, the number of applications approved, the amount of program funds used and available, and feedback about the program.
• Manage the program and process applications until all funds are expended or until the end of the fiscal year, whichever occurs first.

Item #6.7.

Page 153 of 182 ends

OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2

EXHIBIT B
Compensation
The City of Calistoga Water and Wastewater Utility Assistance Program is continuing this as a pilot program. For this fiscal year (FY2026-27), the City Council has allocated funding not to exceed $150,000.00. The City shall pay the Consultant in an amount equal to 10% of the amount allocated to this program ($15,000.00 for FY 2026-27) to compensate UVFC for managing and administering this program. The city council may approve the allocation of additional funds for this fiscal year and/or identify funds to continue the program for future fiscal years.

The City’s payment in accordance with the previous paragraph shall be the total compensation to UVFC for services performed under this Agreement for fiscal year 2026-27. There shall be no additional Direct Labor costs, Subconsultant Cost, or Other Direct Costs (that includes but not limited to living and travel expenses, automobile expenses, reproduction expenses, or special overnight delivery/messenger service expenses) compensation offered or paid by the City.

Item #6.7.

Page 154 of 182 ends

OAK #4823-2508-6159 v2
Item #6.7.

Page 155 of 182 ends

Upvalley Family Center Water Assistance
Final Audit Report 2026-06-18
Created: 2026-06-18
By: Rachel Melick ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAUOihFcaHyJBSxGkjQvG2iCQGt82P2fRa "Upvalley Family Center Water Assistance" History
Document created by Rachel Melick ([email protected]) 2026-06-18 - 7:03:39 PM GMT
Document emailed to Jenny Ocon ([email protected]) for signature 2026-06-18 - 7:03:45 PM GMT
Email viewed by Jenny Ocon ([email protected]) 2026-06-18 - 7:08:03 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Jenny Ocon ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2026-06-18 - 9:33:59 PM GMT - Time Source: server - Signature Appearance Selected: IMAGE Agreement completed.
2026-06-18 - 9:33:59 PM GMT
Item #6.7.

Page 156 of 182 ends

City of Calistoga Water and Wastewater Utility Assistance Program Guidelines (pilot project) Program Overview
The City of Calistoga Water and Wastewater Utility Assistance Program provides means-tested financial assistance for qualifying single-family residential, multifamily residential, and mobile home park accounts. The program is designed to assist low-income Calistoga residents who are having difficulty paying for their water/wastewater bills. Calistoga residents may apply for one of the two program components noted below: However, residents ages 65 or older may qualify for both programs. 1) Recurring subsidy for up to June 30, 2027
- Qualifying households may receive up to $100 or up to$200 per month recurring subsidy, this will reflect as a credit on the account for up to 12 months, depending on household income and size.
2) One-time assistance for past due bills
- Qualifying households may receive up to $1000.00 towards their past-due bills, depending on household income and size. The amount granted for this type of assistance will be reflected in one-time credit on the account.
- Clients will only be eligible to receive past due amounts 1 time every fiscal year. 3) One-time assistance for senior mobile home parks, including Rancho de Calistoga, Calistoga Springs and Chateau.
- Eligible mobile home park residents will receive a monthly credit up to 1yr of ongoing assistance of $120.00 per month. This will cover the cost of sewer and one unit of water.

Program Eligibility Applicants must meet the following criteria:

1. Must be a renter or homeowner living in Calistoga city limits. These funds do not apply to business owners.

2. Must be the named account holder on the water account showing due or past due balance owed. For mobile home park residents, we need to see proof of the most recent rent space invoice which includes sewer and water fees.

3. Households who receive LIRA assistance could be eligible for this aid. However, any other type of assistance that is covered by City of Calistoga Water and Wastewater aid would be consider duplication of services. The City’s goal is to avoid duplication of services and reach the broadest number of qualifying residents.

4. Annual household income does not exceed the guidelines below:

Item #6.7.

Page 157 of 182 ends

People in Household
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Tier 1: Very Low (50%)
Income Limits qualify for
$200 monthly
56,100 64,100 72,150 80,150 86,600 93,000 99,400 105,800 Tier 2:Low (80%) Income
Limits
$100 monthly 89,750 102,550 115,350 128,150 138,450 148,700 158,950 169,200

5. Proof of documentation is required as well as completion of the application. Incomplete applications with missing documentation will not move forward for approval.

6. Households cannot be eligible to receive any other assistance with their water service to avoid duplication of service and to reach the broadest number of qualifying residents.

7. Closed accounts could be eligible for past due assistance; however, City of Calistoga will only cover up to $1000.00, and the account holder is responsible for paying the reminder of the balance at the time application is approved.

8. Re-Certification for monthly ongoing assistance only, for applicants who qualify from JulyDecember they will be required to re-certify in May. For applicants who qualify from DecemberJune they will be required to re-certify in January.

Application Process
UpValley Family Centers is working with City of Calistoga to manage the Water and Wastewater Utility Assistance Program and will review eligibility for all program applications. The application process is noted below:

1. Calistoga residents may submit a completed application to UpValley Family Centers, 913 Washington Street, Calistoga, CA or call 707-965-5010 to schedule an appointment with a case manager for assistance with completing the application. Business hours are Monday 10am-5pm, Tues-Friday 8:30am-5pm. Complete applications including back up documentation will be prioritized.

2. Case managers will review the application with the client and collect documentation. In the application, it will be required to enter all family member information including name, date of birth, and relationship to the applicant. In addition, unrelated people living in the residence should also be included to document total number in the household.

3. Verification of documentation will be required to participate in the program. At least one of the following is required per section for a complete application.

A. Income verification
a. Prior tax returns
b. Most recent paystubs of all family members who have earned income (this excludes any high school students or full-time college students).

Item #6.7.

Page 158 of 182 ends

c. Social security income verification
d. Unemployment income verification
e. Rental income if subleasing
f. Other proof of income or loss of income
g. Signed affidavit statements of no-income
B. Residency verification
a. Current photo identification of applicants
b. Public utility current statement or recent monthly invoice from mobile home park management which includes water and wastewater services. c. Rental agreement
d. Paystubs
e. Bank statements
C. Verification of need
a. Current water bill (if requesting past due amounts, statement must include past due amounts).

D. Re-certify requirements
a. Include most updated proof of income
b. Updated water and wastewater invoice
c. Update application and ROI.

4. Signature of applicant acknowledging the information regarding household members is correct.

Funding Determination
UpValley Family Centers’ staff will review the qualifications, documentation, and application of each household, and each applicant will be notified of the decision on their application in writing. UpValley Family Centers will also send a list to the City of Calistoga every 15th of the month- with application approval, including the type of aid (recurring or one-time) and the amount approved. Qualifying households will receive aid in the form of credit on their water bill. For mobile home park residents City of Calistoga will issue a letter by 25th of every month or following working day after the 25th with all approvals. Park management will apply monthly credits to those approved residents.

Program Funding Limitations
The funding for this Program is authorized by the City of Calistoga on an annual basis and is limited.

Once the authorized funds have been expended, UpValley Family Centers will add prospective applicants to a waiting list and those households will be notified if additional funding becomes available.

Item #6.7.

Page 159 of 182 ends

City of Calistoga

STAFF REPORT
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Mitch Celaya, City Manager
Meeting: City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 23 2026
Subject: Boys & Girls Club Consultant Services and Monhoff Building Lease Agreements
DESCRIPTION:

First amendments to Boys and Girls Club Consultant Services Agreement and Monhoff Center Lease Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:

Consider resolution approving First Amendments to Consultant Services and Building Lease Agreements.

SUMMARY:

On June 30, 2026 the Consultant Services agreement (#1042) with the Boys & Girls Club for Teen Center Services and the Monhoff Building Lease agreement (#1043) with the Boys & Girls Club will expire. The City supports the Boys & Girls Club, values the Teen Center services it provides, and wishes for the Teen Center services to continue in the Monhoff building. The City also acknowledges the Boys & Girls Club's interest in purchasing the Monhoff building as part of continuing to provide Teen Center services.

ANALYSIS:

Staff met with representatives of the Boys & Girls Club Board of Directors and agreed to extend the expiring agreements through First Amendments. The staff and Board Member representatives agreed to the following:
 Reduce the compensation listed in the Consultant Services agreement from $40,000 to $20,000 but leave intact the remaining terms and requirements.  Waive the utility costs to the Boys & Girls Club listed in the Monhoff Building Lease Agreement but leave intact the remaining terms and requirements.  Extend both the Consultant Services Agreement and the Monhoff Building Lease Agreement for one-year, fiscal year 2026/27, effective July 1, 2026.  The City of Calistoga to explore the feasibility, benefits, and process of the sale of the Monhoff Building.

See attached First Amendments to the Consultant Services Agreement and the Building Lease Agreement.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Item #6.8.

Page 160 of 182 ends

The Consultant Services Agreement cost of $20,000 will be expended from the City Manager's Agreements Account & Fund #101-4114-4487. The additional Monhoff Building (estimated) utility cost of approximately $10,000 will be expended out of the Monhoff Building Utility Account & Fund #101-4179-4403.

CEQA STATUS:

Not Applicable
ATTACHMENT(S):

Draft Resolution
First Amendment to Consultant Services Agreement mjc 061826 First Amendment to License Agreement mjc 061826
APPROVAL(S):

Connie Cardenas, Admin. Services Director Approved - Jun 18 2026 Yudiana Galvan, City of Calistoga | City Clerk Approved - Jun 19 2026 Item #6.8.

Page 161 of 182 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

ADOPTED XXXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

CALISTOGA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE FIRST

AMENDMENT AGREEMENTS TO THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT AND THE MONHOFF BUILDING LEASE AGREEMENT.

WHEREAS, the Boys and Girls Club consultant services agreement to provide Teen Center services is expiring on June 30, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the Boys and Girls Club building lease agreement for the Monhoff building is expiring on June 30, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the Boys and Girls Club provides valuable and needed Teen Center services; and
WHEREAS, the City of Calistoga supports and wishes the Boys and Girls Club to continue to provide Teen Center Services in the Monhoff building; and WHEREAS, the City of Calistoga and Boys & Girls Club reached an agreement as to terms for First Amendment Agreements to the Consultant Services and Monhoff Lease agreements to extend the agreements for an additional year; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that approval of the First Amendment Agreements are in the best interests of the City and the Calistoga community.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Calistoga that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the two First Amendment Agreements with the Boys & Girls Club for the Continued Operation of the Teen Center and Lease Agreement of the Monhoff Building.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all terms, conditions, and covenants of said Agreement be, and the same are, hereby approved, ratified, and confirmed.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of June 2026. I, YUDIANA GALVAN, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA, HEREBY CERTIFY the foregoing resolution was introduced and passed at a regular meeting of the Calistoga City Council by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
_________________________ ___________________________
Yudiana Galvan, City Clerk Donald Williams, Mayor
Item #6.8.

Page 162 of 182 ends

4933-8531-0382 v1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
This First Amendment to Agreement for Consultant Services ("Amendment") is made and entered into as of June ___, 2026, by and between the City of Calistoga, a California municipal corporation ("City"), and the Boys & Girls Club of St. Helena and Calistoga, a California non-profit public benefit corporation ("Consultant").

A. On ______, 2025 [Insert date of 2nd signature on Agreement] (“Agreement Effective Date”), City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement for Consultant Services (“Agreement”) pursuant to which City engaged Consultant to perform certain professional services in connection with a youth development program (“Services”).

B. Under the Agreement, Consultant is to provide the Services to City for an initial term of one year (1) from the Agreement Effective Date through June 30, 2026 (“Initial Term”).

C. Though Consultant failed to timely and effectively exercise the First Extension Option to extend the term of the Agreement for one (1) year, City and Consultant have agreed that it is in both parties’ best interest to extend the Initial Term for an additional one (1) year period, as further described herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, which are incorporated herein by reference, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, City and Consultant hereby agree as follows:

1. Options to Extend. The parties acknowledge and agree that Consultant failed to timely and effectively exercise the First Extension Option to extend the Initial Term, as described in Section 3.3 of the Agreement. Accordingly, all of the Extension Options contained in the Agreement are void and of no further force and effect.

2. Extension of Term. Notwithstanding Section 1 of this Amendment, the parties hereby agree to extend the Initial Term of the Agreement for an additional one (1) year period commencing on July 1, 2026 and continuing through June 30, 2027 (“Extension Term”).

3. Compensation. Section 2.1 of the Agreement is hereby modified to reflect that during the Extension Term, the Cost Ceiling for the Services shall not exceed $20,000.

4. Ratification of Agreement. Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment, the Agreement, as amended hereby, is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved in all respects. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Amendment and the provisions of the Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall govern.

5. Duly Authorized. Each person executing this Amendment on behalf of City and Consultant, respectively, represents and warrants that he/she/they is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment on behalf of such entity, and that such person’s execution of this Amendment binds the entity on whose behalf he/she/they is signing.

6. Defined Terms; Entire Agreement. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement. This Amendment and the Item #6.8.

Page 163 of 182 ends

4933-8531-0382 v1
Agreement set forth the entire understanding of the parties in connection with the subject matter hereof. There are no agreements between City and Consultant relating to the Agreement other than those set forth in writing and signed by the parties. Neither party hereto has relied upon any understanding, representation or warranty not set forth herein, either oral or written, as an inducement to enter into this Amendment.

7. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts and the signature of any party to any counterpart may be appended to any other counterpart, all of which counterparts when taken together shall equal one Amendment. The parties acknowledge and agree that facsimile signatures or signatures transmitted by electronic mail in so-called "pdf'” format shall be legal and binding and shall have the same full force and effect as if an original of this Amendment had been delivered. City and Consultant (i) intend to be bound by the signatures on any document sent by facsimile or electronic mail, (ii) are aware that the other party will rely on such signatures, and (iii) hereby waive any defenses to the enforcement of the terms of this Amendment based on the foregoing forms of signatures.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is made as of the day and year first above written.

CITY:

City of Calistoga, a California
municipal corporation
By:

Mitchell Celaya, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Mitchelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney
CONSULTANT:

Boys & Girls Club of St. Helena and Calistoga, a California non-profit public benefit corporation
By:

Trent, Yaconelli, Executive Director
Item #6.8.

Page 164 of 182 ends

4929-1535-0958 v2

FIRST AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT
This First Amendment to License Agreement ("Amendment") is made and entered into as of June ___, 2026, by and between the City of Calistoga, a California municipal corporation ("Licensor"), and the Boys & Girls Club of St. Helena and Calistoga, a California non-profit public benefit corporation ("Licensee").

A. On July 1, 2024 (“Commencement Date”), Licensor and Licensee entered into that certain License Agreement (“Agreement”) for the license of that certain area located at 1247 Stevenson Street, Calistoga, CA 94515, commonly referred to as the Monhoff Building ("License Area").

B. The Agreement allows Licensee to use the License Area for an initial term of one year (1) from the Commencement Date through June 30, 2025 (“Initial Term”).

C. Though Licensee failed to timely and effectively exercise the First Extension Option to extend the term of the Agreement for one (1) year, Licensor and Licensee have agreed that it is in both parties’ best interest to extend the Initial Term for an additional one (1) year period, as further described herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, which are incorporated herein by reference, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, Licensor and Licensee hereby agree as follows:

1. Options to Extend. The parties acknowledge and agree that Licensee failed to timely and effectively exercise the First Extension Option to extend the Initial Term, as described in 3.3 of the Agreement. Accordingly, all of the Extension Options contained in the Agreement are void and of no further force and effect.

2. Extension of Option. Notwithstanding Section 1 of this Amendment, the parties hereby agree to extend the Initial Term of the Agreement for an additional one (1) year period commencing on July 1, 2026 and continuing through June 30, 2027.

3. Utilities. The second sentence if Section 7.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“Licensor shall pay one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of all Licensor Utilities.”

4. Ratification of Agreement. Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment, the Agreement, as amended hereby, is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved in all respects. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Amendment and the provisions of the Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall govern.

5. Duly Authorized. Each person executing this Amendment on behalf of Licensor and Licensee, respectively, represents and warrants that he/she/they is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment on behalf of such entity, and that such person’s execution of this Amendment binds the entity on whose behalf he/she/they is signing.

Item #6.8.

Page 165 of 182 ends

4929-1535-0958 v2

6. Defined Terms; Entire Agreement. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement. This Amendment and the Agreement set forth the entire understanding of the parties in connection with the subject matter hereof. There are no agreements between Licensor and Licensee relating to the Agreement other than those set forth in writing and signed by the parties. Neither party hereto has relied upon any understanding, representation or warranty not set forth herein, either oral or written, as an inducement to enter into this Amendment.

7. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts and the signature of any party to any counterpart may be appended to any other counterpart, all of which counterparts when taken together shall equal one Amendment. The parties acknowledge and agree that facsimile signatures or signatures transmitted by electronic mail in so-called "pdf'” format shall be legal and binding and shall have the same full force and effect as if an original of this Amendment had been delivered. Licensor and Licensee (i) intend to be bound by the signatures on any document sent by facsimile or electronic mail, (ii) are aware that the other party will rely on such signatures, and (iii) hereby waive any defenses to the enforcement of the terms of this Amendment based on the foregoing forms of signatures.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is made as of the day and year first above written.

LICENSOR:

City of Calistoga, a California
municipal corporation
By:

Mitchell Celaya, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Mitchelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney
LICENSEE:

Boys & Girls Club of St. Helena and Calistoga, a California non-profit public benefit corporation
By:

Trent, Yaconelli, Executive Director
Item #6.8.

Page 166 of 182 ends

City of Calistoga

STAFF REPORT
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Derek Rayner, Public Works Director/City Engineer Meeting: City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 23 2026
Subject: City Council Direction on Priority Projects for Upper Valley Waste Management Agency (UVA) Funding Application
DESCRIPTION:

Provide input, discuss options, and provide direction to staff on what grant to submit to UVA.

RECOMMENDATION:

Consider Discussing the Item and Providing Staff Direction SUMMARY:

The Upper Valley Waste Management Agency (UVA) continues to accept project applications under its ongoing Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) program, and the City may submit funding requests at any time. Staff is bringing this item forward to allow the City Council to discuss potential project ideas and provide staff direction on which items staff should apply for.

The City has previously received $100,000 for a street sweeper and $10,000 toward the purchase of nine three-way public receptacles used for compost, landfill, and recycling collection. Other agencies in the Upper Valley have recently used UVA funding for items such as public three-way waste-sorting bins, Big Belly units, mulching lawn mower equipment, illegal-dumping cameras and message boards, signage, and water-refill stations.

To help initiate Council discussion, staff has identified a few potential project ideas - including a sidewalk sweeper and additional three-way compost/landfill/recycle bins for the Fairgrounds and Pool - while recognizing that the Council may identify additional priorities or alternative project concepts for consideration.

ANALYSIS:

The City has several potential project opportunities that could qualify for submission under UVA’s NOFA program, and staff is seeking City Council input on which, if any, should be pursued. The projects identified to date - such as a sidewalk sweeper and an additional three-way waste-sorting bins (compost/landfill/recycle) for the Fairgrounds and pool facility - are intended only as starting points to help initiate Council discussion. Each of these items supports waste-management operations in different ways, but Council may also wish to consider additional ideas based on community needs, operational priorities, or long-term facility improvements.

UVA funding history shows that a broad range of project types have been successfully funded by member jurisdictions in recent years, including outdoor three-way waste-sorting bins, Big Belly smart bins, mulching lawn mower equipment, illegal-dumping cameras and message boards, Item #8.1.

Page 167 of 182 ends

signage, water-refill stations, and other waste-related infrastructure. These examples illustrate the program's flexibility and demonstrate that projects supporting waste diversion, litter reduction, public-space cleanliness, or improved waste-handling practices have generally been well received by the UVA Board.

Staff is also coordinating with the Chamber of Commerce and the Rotary Club on a community-supported effort to re-powder-coat the existing waste-sorting bins along Main Street. At this time, it appears that Rotary donations will likely cover this work, reducing the need to seek UVA funding for that specific improvement.

Because UVA typically provides up to $100,000 per application and awards funding on a reimbursement basis, the City can structure its proposals to meet both operational needs and funding limitations. Smaller projects, such as receptacles, may be fully or partially reimbursable depending on scope, while larger projects - such as a potential trash enclosure at the Fairgrounds - may require additional planning, supplemental funding, or phased implementation. Ultimately, Council direction is needed to identify which project ideas best reflect current priorities and warrant preparation of formal applications for UVA consideration.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with this discussion item. Potential fiscal effects will depend on which project or projects the City Council directs staff to pursue for UVA funding.

Preliminary cost estimates for possible project ideas include approximately $60,000 for a sidewalk sweeper and approximately $60,000 for 14 three-way bins for the Fairgrounds and Pool facilities. A potential trash enclosure at the Fairgrounds may require a significantly higher investment, with final costs dependent on size, materials, and design.

UVA’s NOFA program typically provides up to $100,000 per application on a reimbursement basis, and projects exceeding this amount may require supplemental City funds or additional grant sources.

CEQA STATUS:

The recommended action is not a project under the definitions contained in the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is therefore exempt from CEQA.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Call for 2022-26 Projects NOFA & Status Update as of 6-13-25_FINAL APPROVAL(S):

Connie Cardenas, Admin. Services Director Approved - Jun 11 2026 Rachel Stepp, Deputy City Manager Approved - Jun 11 2026 Yudiana Galvan, City of Calistoga | City Clerk Approved - Jun 15 2026 Item #8.1.

Page 168 of 182 ends

1195 Third Street
Suite 101
Napa, CA 94559
Phone: (707) 253-4351
Fax: (707) 253-4627

Page 1 of 2 ends

NOTICE OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY (NOFA)
Upper Valley Waste Management Agency (UVA)
As of June 12, 2025
Ongoing, Temporary Application Window Open
The Upper Valley Waste Management Agency (UVA) is continuing to accept applications for a limited time for funding to support waste management-related projects conducted by UVA’s member jurisdictions:
• Napa County
• Town of Yountville
• City of St. Helena
• City of Calistoga
This funding was generated as a result of higher-than-expected waste volumes from the 2017 Napa and Sonoma fires. Since funds were generated through rate payers within the Agency’s jurisdiction, proposed projects must be conducted within UVA boundaries and must align with UVA’s mission. This is a temporary continuance of the application process. UVA encourages interested jurisdictions to apply as soon as possible, as the Board may close the application period at any time and retains full discretion to fund all, part, or none of the submitted projects.

Application Information and Deadlines:
• Applications will be accepted on a rolling basis for a limited time. • Applications will only be accepted from member jurisdictions, though jurisdictions are welcome to partner with others, such as non-profit organizations or citizen groups. • Awards will likely be approved at the next scheduled UVA Board meeting.

Application Requirements:

The project application must include:
• A detailed description of the proposed project, including a well-defined scope, purpose (what do you hope to achieve), and specific end point (what will success look like). • The names, roles, and organizations who will be involved in the project. • Requested funding amount, along with a cost estimate or budget (keep in mind the Agency may choose to only partially fund a proposed project) • A project schedule and location (include a map at sufficient scale to clearly identify the location of the project, if the project is location-specific).

Item #8.1.

Page 169 of 182 ends
Page 2 of 2 ends

• Projects must relate to the Agency’s mission of waste management, examples include:
o Clean up and restoration of an area.
o Programs to maximize re-use, recycling, and composting. o Minimizing litter or illegal dumping.
o Educational programs related to waste management, including climate change as it relates to waste management and recycling.
o Other projects, such as road repairs or similar infrastructure projects, can be proposed so long as a study showing a nexus between the proposed project and the agency (e.g. waste collection results in road damage, the proposed project mitigates that damage) is provided.

Selection Process:
• Each application will be evaluated by a team of Agency experts in their related fields for completeness and alignment with requirements as outlined previously. • This scoring will be advisory only, all submitted projects will be provided to the Board for their consideration and final decision.
• The Board retains the absolute right to fully, partially, or to not fund any submitted project at its discretion.
• There are no fixed allocations per jurisdiction; funding will be based on merit and Board discretion.

Award Conditions:
• Confirm, in writing, the project intent within 60 days of the Board action. • Project must be completed within one year of confirmation. • Funds will be provided on a reimbursement basis.
• Must submit a project closeout report to qualify for future funding.

Contact Information: Steve Lederer, Agency Manager
(707) 253-4351
[email protected]
Amanda Griffis, Agency Staff
[email protected]
Respectfully,
Steve Lederer, Agency Manager
Upper Valley Waste Management Agency
Steven Lederer (Jun 16, 2025 16:02 PDT)
Steven Lederer
Item #8.1.

Page 170 of 182 ends

1195 Third Street
Suite 101
Napa, CA 94559
Phone: (707) 253-4351
Fax: (707) 253-4627
NOFA Project Status Update as of June 13, 2025

NOFA AWARDS
Funded Projects and Status Update as of June 2025
Jurisdiction Award Reimbursed Scope Status
City of Calistoga $100,000 $100,000 Street Sweeper (portion) Complete City of St. Helena $120,000 $0 New Bins Pending
Town of Yountville P1 $77,679.56 $76,651.26 Lawnmower & New Bins Complete Town of Yountville P2 $98,500 $98,500 Belly Bins Complete Napa County $90,000 $67,300.64 Illegal Dumping Deterrents Complete City of St. Helena – Award $120,000
• Project Scope: Initially the Money Way Waste/Recycling Consolidation Project. Revised in May 2024 to purchase new recycling, compost, and trash containers. • No reimbursement request submitted to date. The city is working with the vendor on potential discounts due to damaged bins.
• Status: Bins installed; UVWMA staff assisting with appropriate signage for bins.

Town of Yountville – Reimbursed $76,651.26
• Project Scope: Purchase of mulching lawnmower and public trash/recycling bins. • Status: Project complete and reimbursed.

Napa County – Reimbursed $67,300.64
• Project Scope: Purchase and installation of security cameras and message boards to deter illegal dumping and littering.
• Status: Project complete and reimbursed.

Town of Yountville – Reimbursed $98,500
• Project Scope: Install “Big Belly” smart recycling, compost, and trash bins in high-traffic areas. • Status: Project complete and reimbursed.

City of Calistoga – Reimbursed $100,000
• Project Scope: Purchase of new street sweeper.
• Status: Project complete and reimbursed.

Item #8.1.

Page 171 of 182 ends

City of Calistoga

STAFF REPORT
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Sheli Wright, Fairgrounds Revitalization Director Meeting: City Council Regular Meeting - Jun 23 2026
Subject: Consideration and direction regarding development and release of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for operation and long-term management of the Mt. St. Helena Golf Course.

DESCRIPTION:

Consideration and direction regarding the development and release of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the operation and long-term management of the Mt. St. Helena Golf Course.

RECOMMENDATION:

Consider Discussing the Item and Providing Staff Direction SUMMARY:

The Fairgrounds Advisory Committee recommends that the City Council direct City staff to move forward with the preparation and release of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the operation, management, and potential improvement of the Mt. St. Helena Golf Course.

ANALYSIS:

Over the course of its April and May meetings, the Fairgrounds Advisory Committee (FAC) discussed the future of the Fairgrounds Golf Course and received significant public input regarding potential long-term uses of the property. A recurring theme throughout these discussions was strong community interest in preserving and reopening the golf course. Committee members and members of the public expressed support for exploring opportunities to return the course to operation while minimizing financial and operational impacts on the City.

To better understand the feasibility of this approach, the Golf Course Subcommittee met with the Fairgrounds Revitalization Director and the Public Works Director to review reclaimed water availability, irrigation requirements, and operational considerations for a golf course. In addition, representatives of the FAC and staff met with several golf course operators and consulted with the City's Utility Systems Superintendent to discuss potential operating models, opportunities, and constraints associated with the property.

These discussions identified several potential benefits of a third-party operating arrangement, including access to specialized golf course management expertise, expanded recreational programming opportunities, improved customer service, and the potential to reduce the City's direct operational responsibilities. Discussions also highlighted important considerations that would need to be addressed in any future agreement, including protection of the City's interests, preservation of the golf course as a community asset, continued public access, coordination with Fairgrounds Item #8.2.

Page 172 of 182 ends

operations and special events, parking availability, use of reclaimed water, and clearly defined maintenance and performance expectations.

Based on the information gathered to date, staff believes the next appropriate step is to develop and issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to solicit interest from qualified golf course operators. The RFP process would provide the City with a transparent and competitive method for evaluating potential operating partners and determining whether viable opportunities exist to reopen and operate the golf course. The RFP would establish the City's objectives, operational requirements, maintenance standards, financial expectations, and other terms necessary to ensure that any future proposal aligns with the City's goals for the Fairgrounds and broader community.

While the FAC has discussed elements that may be included within an RFP, the development of procurement documents is a staff function. Staff will use input from the FAC, community members, and the document will reflect the priorities and interests identified through the committee process.

Staff recommends that the Fairgrounds Department, in coordination with the Public Works Department, prepare and issue a Request for Proposals for the operation and management of the Fairgrounds Golf Course. Upon completion of the RFP process, staff will evaluate any proposals received and return to the City Council with findings, recommendations, and any proposed lease or operating agreements for Council consideration and approval.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no immediate significant fiscal impact associated with preparing and issuing an RFP for the operation and management of the Fairgrounds Golf Course, as related staff time and administrative costs can be accommodated within existing resources.

CEQA STATUS:

The recommended action is not a project under the definitions contained in the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is therefore exempt from CEQA ATTACHMENT(S):

Golf Course Subcommittee Report - RFP to Council 6 23 26 APPROVAL(S):

Rachel Stepp, Deputy City Manager Approved - Jun 10 2026 Connie Cardenas, Admin. Services Director Approved - Jun 10 2026 Yudiana Galvan, City of Calistoga | City Clerk Approved - Jun 15 2026 Item #8.2.

Page 173 of 182 ends

City of Calistoga | COMMITTEE REPORT
DATE: June 3, 2026, for the June 23, 2026, City Council Meeting COMMITTEE INFORMATION: Fairgrounds Advisory Committee (FAC), Golf Course Subcommittee
DESCRIPTION: Consideration and direction regarding development and release of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for operation and long-term management of the Mt. St. Helena Golf Course.

RECOMMENDATION: The Fairgrounds Advisory Committee recommends that the City Council direct City staff to move forward with preparation and release of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the operation, management, and potential improvement of the Mt. St. Helena Golf Course.

SUMMARY:

The Mt. St. Helena Golf Course is an important recreational and community asset that provides opportunities for residents, visitors, youth programs, tournaments, and community events. The Fairgrounds Advisory Committee recognizes the value of the golf course to the community and the need to ensure its long-term operational sustainability and financial viability.

The golf course also plays an important role in supporting local tourism and Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) revenue generation by providing an additional recreational amenity for visitors staying in local accommodations and the Fairgrounds RV Park. The course contributes to the overall visitor experience and supports Calistoga’s reputation as a leisure, wellness and destination community.

Additionally, the golf course serves as an important and beneficial use site for reclaimed water, supporting the City’s broader sustainability and water reuse objectives. Continued operation of the course provides an ongoing opportunity for responsible reclaimed water utilization and landscape irrigation.

The FAC recommends that the City Council authorize staff to begin an RFP process to identify qualified operators and/or partners who can provide innovative management approaches, operational expertise, and potential investment opportunities that support the continued success of the golf course.

The RFP process would allow the City to evaluate a range of operational models and partnership opportunities while maintaining transparency and public engagement throughout the process.

ANALYSIS:

The Fairgrounds Advisory Committee has discussed the importance of long-term planning and sustainability for the golf course operations. An RFP process would provide the City with an opportunity to evaluate qualified proposals from experienced golf course operators and management teams.

Item #8.2.

Page 174 of 182 ends

Benefits of initiating an RFP process may include:
• Identification of operational efficiencies and best practices • Opportunities for increased revenue generation
• Enhanced recreational programming, community use and youth inclusion • Support for tourism and visitor-serving amenities
• Increased attractiveness of local lodging and RV accommodations • Continued beneficial use of reclaimed water resources • Exploration of capital improvement opportunities
• Long-term operational sustainability planning
• Improved maintenance and customer service standards
The FAC believes that the golf course is an important component of the Fairgrounds, local tourism economy, and the City’s reclaimed water program. A structured and transparent RFP process will allow the City to gather information, compare operational approaches, and determine the best path forward for the golf course and community.

Issuing an RFP does not commit the City to a specific agreement or operational change but instead provides an opportunity to evaluate potential options and partnerships.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no immediate significant fiscal impact associated with directing staff to prepare and release an RFP. Staff time and administrative costs associated with the process can be accommodated within existing operational resources.

Future financial impacts, opportunities, or contractual obligations would be evaluated and presented to the City Council upon completion of the RFP review process.

CEQA STATUS:

The proposed direction to prepare and release an RFP does not constitute a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is therefore not subject to environmental review at this time. Any future projects or improvements resulting from the RFP process will be evaluated for CEQA compliance as required.

ATTACHMENT(S):

None
Item #8.2.

Page 175 of 182 ends

1 From: kathi johnson
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 2:53 PM
To: Donald Williams
Subject: Golf Course at Fairgrounds
I totally support the idea of developing a golf course at the Fairgrounds here in Calistoga!! Sent from my iPhone
Item #8.2.

Page 176 of 182 ends

1 From: Betty Briggs
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 5:59 PM
To: Donald Williams
Subject: fairgrounds
Hi Don,
Just putting in our wish for development of the golf course. Thanks a lot.

Sincerely
Betty Briggs
AnnSeagraves
Judy Whitney
Lois Fanzone
Item #8.2.

Page 177 of 182 ends

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: ALF BURTLESON
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 8:39 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Council meeting June 23, agenda item 8.2 yes fairgrounds golf proposals Council meeting June 23, agenda item 8.2YES fairgrounds golf proposals.

Alf Burtleson
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
Item #8.2.

Page 178 of 182 ends

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Josephine Richard
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 7:08 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Golf course
I would like to record my support for the reinstating a golf course at the Fairgrounds. I believe it is a popular recreational activity, especially for people on vacation , and would enhance the appeal of Calistoga as a vacation destination. We need to be able to offer something different from wine tasting and spa’s which are a common feature of Napa and Sonoma valley towns.

I appreciate that it will take considerable financial commitment to refurbish the golf course. However , we already have the info structure for recycled water. In addition, for ‘recognition at the golf course’ I think some of the larger resorts would be interested in making a financial contribution.

A golf course would enhance and diversify the appeal of Calistoga as a vacation destination, and thus the initial expenditure would pay for itself.

Thank you for considering this matter.

Jo Richard
Sent from my iPhone
Item #8.2.

Page 179 of 182 ends

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: larry costello
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 6:32 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Golf Course
Hello, I am writing to you all in support of Mt. St. Helena Golf Course.I would like many generations to be able to enjoy the course as my Dad and I have. I strongly urge you to vote in favor of the golf course. Thank you all, Larry Costello Calistoga, Ca 94515 Item #8.2.

Page 180 of 182 ends

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Colleen Darfler
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 8:54 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Item 8.2 on 6/23 Agenda
Please be advised that I am a Calistoga resident and in full support of the revitalization and development of the St Helena Golf Course. Let’s bring it back to its former glory.

Unfortunately I am unable to attend the meeting.

Thank you
Colleen Darfler
Sent from my iPhone
Item #8.2.

Page 181 of 182 ends

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Mike Vaughn
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 8:22 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: City Council Meeting June 23rd Agenda item 8.2 Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,
My name is Mike Vaughn, and I am a resident of Calistoga and an avid golfer. I am writing to express my strong support for Agenda Item #8.2 regarding the Request for Proposals (RFP) for the golf course.

As someone who loves the sport, having a high-quality, local course right here in Calistoga is something our community deeply needs. Right now, local golfers have to travel outside of our area just to get a round in. A local course would not only serve as a great community asset and recreational hub, but it is a place I would personally use and play at every single day.

Moving forward with this RFP is a vital step toward restoring an incredible recreational option for residents, families, and visitors. I strongly urge the Council to approve this item and select a partner who will build and maintain a course we can all be proud of.

Thank you for your time and your service to Calistoga.

Sincerely,
Mike Vaughn
Item #8.2.

Page 182 of 182 ends
← All documents from this meeting