Calistoga City Council
July 14, 2026

Mayor
Donald Williams
Vice Mayor
Lisa Gift
Councilmembers
Irais Lopez-Ortega
Scott Cooper
Kevin Eisenberg
AGENDA
City Council - Regular Meeting
Tuesday, July 14, 2026 - 6:00 PM
1307 Washington St., Calistoga
Hybrid
Please participate in the meeting by observing or listening to the meeting in one of the following ways:

1. Watch on your TV – Napa Valley TV Channel 28

2. Listen or participate via your phone – dial 1-669-900-6833, enter webinar ID: 869-7536-9274

3. Watch or participate online via Zoom - click this link

4. Watch online via YouTube Live at youtube.com/cityofcalistoga Councilmember Lopez-Ortega will be attending via teleconference from 900 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90017 under AB2449 provisions.

COMMENT ON THIS MATTER DURING THE MEETING: Please participate in the meeting by providing public comment on any item on the agenda or any item of municipal concern. To comment during a virtual meeting (Zoom), click the "Raise Your Hand" button to request to speak when Public Comment is being taken on the Agenda item. You will be unmuted when it is your turn to make your comment for up to 3 minutes. After the allotted time, you will be re-muted.

WRITTEN COMMENTS: Alternatively, you may provide public comment on any item on the agenda or any item of municipal concern via email. Please submit your comment, limited to 350 words or less, via email to [email protected]. Written public comments submitted by email should clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Oral Communications” in the Subject Line for items not on the agenda and are requested to include the submitter’s full name. Comments must be submitted at least four hours prior to the meeting start time to be included in the agenda and posted online. Comments received thereafter, will be made part of the official record and given to the Committee after the meeting. Note: The methods of observing or listening to the meeting or providing public comments may be altered or the meeting may be cancelled, if needed, due to certain technical disruptions.

1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND OPTIONAL PATRIOTIC

ACTIVITY

2. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSIONS

3. ORAL COMMUNICATION ON CONSENT ITEMS OR NON-AGENDA ITEMS This time is set aside to receive comments from the public regarding matters on the Consent Calendar or matters of municipal concern not on the agenda. Pursuant to Government Code section 54954.3 (the Brown Act), however, the Council cannot consider any issues or take action on any requests not on the agenda during this comment period. Speakers are encouraged to limit their comments to 3 minutes maximum so that all speakers have an opportunity to address the City Council.

3.1. PUBLIC COMMENT (Page 5 - 6)

4. CITY MANAGER’S REPORT

5. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS/ AWARDS

5.1. **THIS ITEM HAS BEEN MOVED TO A FUTURE MEETING**
The Recreation Department will Present to Council on the 4th of July Event.

Recommended Action: - Receive the Presentation
Staff Report - Presentation by the Recreation Department - Pdf (Page 7)

6. CONSENT CALENDAR

6.1. Adoption of Consent Calendar
Recommended Action: To adopt consent calendar as presented / with the exception of

6.2. Adopting the Meeting Minutes of a Prior Meeting.

City Council - Special Meeting - Jun 03 2026 - Minutes - Pdf (Page 8 - 10)

6.3. Authorizes a not-to-exceed construction cost of $725,000 to complete the 20-MillionGallon Pond Relining Project. This price includes authorizing the City Manager to award CATS4U, Inc., the lowest bidder, the contract for their base bid with alternate in an amount of $656,489 and allocates an additional $68,511 (10%) in contingency for change orders, allowing the Public Works Director to negotiate change orders within this amount.

Recommended Action: - Consider Adopting the Resolution
Staff Report - Award The 20-Million-Gallon Pond Relining Project, Project #26-5567. - Pdf (Page 11 - 18)

6.4. Adoption of the Senate Bill 1 (SB1) Project List for Fiscal Year 2026/27 to address basic road maintenance needs on local roads and state highways Recommended Action: - Consider Adopting the Resolution
Staff Report - Adoption of the Senate Bill 1 (SB1) Project List for Fiscal Year 2026/27 - Pdf (Page 19 - 25)
PUBLIC COMMENT (Page 19 - 25)

6.5. Council will consider approving a contract with T&S West for the construction of a canopy at the Police Department Range.

Recommended Action: - Consider Adopting the Resolution
Staff Report - Final Phase of Range Improvement Project - Pdf (Page 26 - 30)

7. PUBLIC HEARING

8. GENERAL GOVERNMENT

8.1. Consider Providing Direction Regarding a Proposal from Hearts and Hands Preschool to Utilize the Residential Structure Located Adjacent to the Calistoga Fairgrounds RV Park
Recommended Action:

Receive the staff report, discuss the proposal, and provide direction to staff by taking one of the following actions:

1. Direct the City Manager to negotiate the terms of a lease or license agreement with Hearts and Hands Preschool for use of the residential structure, with any agreement conditioned upon Hearts and Hands being solely responsible for all costs associated with obtaining permits, completing required improvements, and bringing the building into compliance with all applicable building, fire, licensing, accessibility, and other regulatory requirements, subject to future City Council approval.

2. Direct staff to conduct additional analysis or return with additional information before further consideration of the proposal.

3. Determine not to pursue the proposal.

Staff Report - Proposal from Hearts and Hands Preschool to Utilize a Fairgrounds Residence - Pdf (Page 31 - 42)
PUBLIC COMMENT (Page 31 - 42)

PUBLIC COMMENT (Page 31 - 42)

8.2. To discuss Grant and Washington Street paving projects with city council to seek direction on selecting which Project to bid/construct next winter/summer Recommended Action: - Consider Discussing the Item and Providing Staff Direction Staff Report - Provide Background and Discuss Paving Grant or Washington - Pdf (Page 43 - 62)
PUBLIC COMMENT (Page 43 - 62)
PUBLIC COMMENT (Page 43 - 62)

8.3. Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a $358,317.74 purchase order with Mobile Modular for a modular office building behind City Hall, and directing staff to return with quotes for associated utility and site work.

Recommended Action:

Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a purchase order with Mobile Modular in the amount of $358,317.74 using the competitively bid Sourcewell ezIQC® process and directing staff to return at the next regular City Council meeting with quotes for the associated utility infrastructure and site preparation work for Council consideration and award.

Alternatively, the City Council may provide direction to:

1. Direct staff to return at the next regular City Council meeting with the full modular office project for Council consideration, including both the Mobile Modular purchase order and the associated utility infrastructure and site preparation work; or

2. Take no further action on the modular office project at this time.

Staff Report - Modular Office Project Direction - Pdf (Page 63 - 75) PUBLIC COMMENT (Page 63 - 75)

9. COUNCIL REPORTS

10. ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE: If you challenge a city’s zoning, planning, or other decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Judicial review of any City administrative decision may be had only if a petition is filed with the court not later than the 90th day following the date upon which the decision becomes final. Judicial review of environmental determinations may be subject to a shorter time period for Litigation, in certain cases 30 days following the date of final decision.

Pursuant to GC §54957.5: any writings/documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection on the City website at www.calistogaca.gov SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL RECEIVED AFTER THE POSTING OF THE AGENDA:

Any supplemental writings or documents distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, such writings or documents will be made available on the City’s website and will be available for public review in the City Clerk’s Office located at 1232 Washington Street, Calistoga, California, during normal business hours and by appointment.

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: The City can provide special assistance for persons with disabilities to participate in public meetings. To make a request for disability-related modification or accommodation please contact the City Clerk at [email protected] or (707) 942-2807. If you need assistance or accommodation, please provide notice at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. For TTY/ Speech-to-Speech users, dial 7-1-1 for the California Relay Service, offering free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

ACTA DE AMERICANOS CON DISCAPACIDADES Se les pide por favor que avise con 48 horas de anticipacion cuando necesita hacer un pedido de assistencia. Esto nos da suficiente tiempo antes de la junta para que la ciudad tome medidas razonables.

POSTING: I declare a copy of this agenda was posted at City Hall, 1232 Washington Street, Calistoga, among other locations in the city limits of Calistoga, on July 7, 2026.

Yudiana Galvan, City Clerk

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Charlotte Williams
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 3:20 PM
To: Public Comment; Public Comment
Subject: 1800 Lincoln Avenue project
Dear City Clerk Galvan,
Please forward the letter below to the Planning Department, Planning Commission and City Council.

Thank you.

Charlotte Williams
___________________________
In regards to the proposed project at 1800 Lincoln Avenue, I have these concerns:

A portion of that parcel is well below the level of Lincoln Avenue and the adjacent Up Valley Inn property.

During steady or heavy rains the water sits on that parcel for days if not weeks before it either drains or evaporates. Any amount of building on that property will need to include extensive storm drainage and probably fill to raise it to the level of Lincoln Avenue. Any increase in elevation of that parcel without significant engineering and installation of storm drains will cause flooding to the adjacent properties on Wappo, Grant, Arch and View streets. I have observed even in this past rainy season that the Grant Street storm drains are not sufficient to prevent ankle-deep water from accumulating on the north side of Grant Street between Arch Way and the Silverado Terrace property.

This issue of drainage and heavy clay soils that do not easily percolate water is compounded by the proposed development of Clinic Olé. In the field where the clinic is proposed pools of water form during rains and stay for several days after significant rain. This whole north side of town is built on clay soils which do not drain quickly; expanding when wet and contracting during the dry months.

I believe extensive testing of soils and drainage should occur, taking into account the development and hardscaping of both properties; 1800 Lincoln Avenue as well as the two Clinic Olé parcels bordered by Lincoln Avenue, Lake Street and View Road.

The second issue that causes me great concern is that the initial proposal included two-story houses 15 ft off of the View Road neighboring properties. If the parcel was filled similar to the Redwood Avenue project any proposed building would end up several feet higher than the current parcel elevation. That would certainly cause the diminishment in monetary value of View Road, Arch Way, Grant Street and Wappo Street properties as well as the ability of those existing homeowners to enjoy their properties.

This sort of proposal is unfriendly and injurious.

Item #3.1.

2 My third concern is traffic impacts. The proposal that was first shown to the nearby neighbors shows a single exit and entrance onto Lincoln Avenue for the commercial establishments and the proposed apartments. That proposal also showed 37 homes, a number of duplexes and five ADUs with a gated exit and entrance via a View Road spur. This is flat out one of the most dangerous traffic proposals I've ever seen. View Road is a narrow curving street. Many residents on that street park at least one vehicle on the street. Not to mention the various trades, delivery vehicles and guests that usually park on the street.

That street is also used regularly and frequently as a pedestrian and bicycle thoroughfare. The number of vehicle trips generated by even 10 homes exiting and entering via the View Road spur would endanger many many people and ruin View Road.

My fourth concern is that the initial proposal was a strangely separatist vision where the $1.? million dollar homes were separated by gates from the apartments closer to Lincoln Avenue. Not only is this a very unfriendly and unneighborly sort of design but it essentially suggests that the houses are being built as corporate gift houses or second homes. They do nothing to improve the integrity, cohesiveness or stability of the Calistoga community, leaving more and more property in the hands of people who do not live here full-time.

I don't believe there is any state law that mandates that Calistoga needs to provide second homes for wealthy people or corporations.

Fifth, an inventory of all trees on that property should be taken now. Calculations of water usage (rainfall) by each tree should be made and taken into account of any development on that property.

Environmental and societal values should be assigned to each tree. If the developer decides to destroy any trees they should be required to compensate the town and neighborhood, in all ways, for the loss of those trees.

Sincerely,
Charlotte Williams

Item #3.1.

City of Calistoga

STAFF REPORT
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Erin Stroud, Recreation Manager
Meeting: City Council - Regular Meeting - Jul 14 2026
Subject: Presentation by the Recreation Department
DESCRIPTION:

The Recreation will present to Council on the 4th of July Event.

RECOMMENDATION:

Receive the Presentation
CEQA STATUS:

None
APPROVAL(S):

Yudiana Galvan, City of Calistoga | City Clerk Approved - Jul 07 2026 Item #5.1.

MINUTES

CALISTOGA CITY COUNCIL - SPECIAL MEETING
Wednesday, June 3, 2026 - 6:00 PM
Calistoga Community Center | 1307 Washington Street Calistoga, CA 94515

1. Call to Order/Roll Call/Pledge of Allegiance and Optional Patriotic Activity Mayor Williams called the special meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

Present: Mayor Williams, Vice Mayor Gift and Councilmembers Lopez-Ortega, Eisenberg and Cooper.

Absent:

2. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSIONS
There was a closed session on real estate negotiations, no reportable action.

3. ORAL COMMUNICATION ON CONSENT ITEMS OR NON-AGENDA ITEMS Public comment was received from Isla Moore, Jeremiah Moore, Elizabeth Tangney, Pamela Fradelizio, Gianna Fradelizio, Cindy Yant, Crista Foxshart and Mateo Fradelizio .

4. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS/ AWARDS

4.1. Board President Mary Ann Salinger presented Council with a status report on Hearts and Hands Preschool. Council asked clarifying questions.

Public comment was received from Charlotte Williams, Cindy Yant, Rick Kaiser and Millie Pease.

5. CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
City Manager Celaya reported:

1. There will be a pop-up Carnival on 6/12-6/14 at the Fairgrounds, free admission.

2. A Napa Classic Car Show is coming to the Fairgrounds on 6/19-6/20.

3. On 6/20 is the Father's Day Classic Car Show at the Fairgrounds, where the Native Sons will be hosting a pancake breakfast.

4. The Lincoln Ave Project begins on 6/22. Look for traffic and parking signs.

5. The Storm Drain Pipe installation will begin this summer on Grant St. between Maggie Ave. and Centennial Cir. Traffic will be impacted.

6. CM Celaya thanked Fairgrounds Director Sheli Wright for the success of the Ag Fair.

6. CONSENT CALENDAR

6.1. Council approved the meeting minutes from 4/21 and 5/12.

7. PUBLIC HEARING

7.1. Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-38 & 2026-39 - Fiscal Year 26/27 Budget, Fee Schedule and Annual Appropriations Limit.

Administrative Services Director Connie Cardenas presented this item to Council who asked clarifying questions.

Public comment was received from Charlotte Williams.

Item #6.2.

City Council - Special Meeting Minutes June 3, 2026
Motion by Councilmember Lopez-Ortega and seconded by Councilmember Eisenberg to adopt the attached resolutions approving the City of Calistoga Fiscal Year 26/27 Budget, the Annual Appropriations Limit for the Fiscal Year 26/27 and all attachments for both documents. Motion Carried
AYES: Mayor Williams, Councilmember Lopez-Ortega,
Councilmember Eisenberg, Councilmember Cooper, and
Vice Mayor Gift
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

8. GENERAL GOVERNMENT

8.1. Recommendation that Council review and amend the Advisory Committee Bylaws to include the previously adopted regulations related to the Councilmember Liaison This item was presented by Management Analyst Claudia Pouliot and discussed by the Council.

Public comment was received from Cindy Yant.

Motion by Mayor Williams and seconded by Councilmember Lopez-Ortega Consider Approving Amendments to the Advisory Committee Bylaws Motion Carried AYES: Mayor Williams, Councilmember Lopez-Ortega,
Councilmember Eisenberg, and Councilmember Cooper
NOES: Vice Mayor Gift
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

9. COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Lopez-Ortega requested that the Mayor adjourn this meeting in memory of Rose Beck. She reported that she attended the Planning Commission meeting, where the Clinic Ole Project was approved, the Napa County League of Governments meeting and a Latino Leaders Roundtable in Napa, where Senator Cabaldon and Congressman Mike Thompson presented.

Councilmember Lopez-Ortega requested the Hearts and Hands item be placed on the agenda for a discussion of options; there was Council support. She also invited the public to a Napa County Council on Aging presentation on June 22nd at the Community Center.

Councilmember Eisenberg attended the Napa County League of Governments meeting, where Firewise and the Open Space District presented on a tax initiative. He also attended an NVTA meeting.

Councilmember Cooper also attended the Napa County League of Governments meeting.

Vice Mayor Gift attended the Napa County League of Governments and a Bay Area Regional Energy Network conference, where she spoke about the Calistoga Resiliency Center.

Mayor Williams attended NVTA and the Fairgrounds Advisory Committee meeting; the golf course

Item #6.2.

City Council - Special Meeting Minutes June 3, 2026
discussion continues.

10. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Williams adjourned the meeting at 7:38 p.m. in memory of Rose Beck.

Respectfully submitted:

Prepared by: Approved by:
______________________ ______________________
Yudiana Galvan, City Clerk Donald Williams, Mayor

Item #6.2.

City of Calistoga

STAFF REPORT
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Derek Rayner, Public Works Director/City Engineer Meeting: City Council - Regular Meeting - Jul 14 2026
Subject: Award The 20-Million-Gallon Pond Relining Project, Project #26-5567.

DESCRIPTION:

Authorizes a not-to-exceed construction cost of $725,000 to complete the 20-Million-Gallon Pond Relining Project. This price includes authorizing the City Manager to award CATS4U, Inc., the lowest bidder, the contract for their base bid with alternate in an amount of $656,489 and allocates an additional $68,511 (10%) in contingency for change orders, allowing the Public Works Director to negotiate change orders within this amount.

RECOMMENDATION:

Consider Adopting the Resolution
SUMMARY:

The 20-Million-Gallon Pond at the wastewater treatment plant stores tertiary-treated effluent after it has completed the activated sludge, filtration, and disinfection process. The pond’s liner, installed in 2003, is now over 20 years old and showing significant signs of deterioration similar to the recently replaced equalization and aeration basin liners, and is at the end of its useful life and should be replaced to prevent a future failure.

Staff recommends awarding the contract to CATS4U Inc., the low-bid contractor. The project will include cleaning the pond, installing a new, thicker HDPE liner with an anticipated lifespan of 25–45 years, and installing new safety fencing. Work is planned for summer 2026 to maintain reliable operations and avoid the risk of an emergency repair.

ANALYSIS:

The timeline for this project has been as follows:

1. May 8, 2026 – City advertised the bid for the project.

2. June 9, 2026 - City opened bids.

3. July 14, 2026 – City requests Construction award to CATS4U The city received five base bids as summarized below (Engineer’s Estimate for the project was $1,150,000):

1. CATS4U, Inc $648,089

2. Terracon Constructors, Inc $673,028

3. Corcus Construction Inc $708,370

4. LVI Engineering $995,730.04
Item #6.3.

5. HYPER Pro Equipment & Resource INC $1,582,580
CATS4U, Inc., was identified as the apparent low bidder. Staff reviewed the bid, conducted due diligence, and completed reference checks. Based on this review, staff recommends that the City Council find CATS4U, Inc., to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder and award the contract accordingly.

City staff plans to provide CM and inspection for the project.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The total project cost of $725,000 is well within the account budget. The City Council approved the FY26/27 project budget for WWTP Plant Improvements that the 20-Million-Gallon Pond Relining Project was under in Account No. 113-4142-5609-94915 that had a total project budget of $1,465,000.

CEQA STATUS:

The project involves the replacement and reconstruction of existing infrastructure. The facility will be located on the same site and will have the same purpose and capacity as the original infrastructure with no expansion in capacity. As such the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Title 14, the California Code of Regulations, Section 15302(c).

ATTACHMENT(S):
20MG_Pond_Relining_Resolution_Matched
Attachment 2_Contract
APPROVAL(S):

Connie Cardenas, Admin. Services Director Approved - Jul 06 2026 Mitch Celaya, City Manager Approved - Jul 06 2026
Yudiana Galvan, City of Calistoga | City Clerk Approved - Jul 07 2026 Item #6.3.

RESOLUTION 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA, COUNTY OF NAPA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONSTRUCTION WORK TO CATS4U, INC. FOR THE 20-MILLION-GALLON POND RELINING PROJECT
WHEREAS, the 20-Million-Gallon (20MG) Pond at the City of Calistoga Wastewater Treatment Plant stores tertiary-treated effluent following the activated sludge, filtration, and disinfection processes; and
WHEREAS, the pond’s existing liner was installed in 2003 and, after more than 20 years of service, is showing significant deterioration similar to the recently replaced equalization and aeration basin liners; and
WHEREAS, the liner has reached the end of its useful life and requires replacement to prevent potential failure, ensure regulatory compliance, and maintain reliable wastewater treatment operations; and
WHEREAS, the City advertised the bid for the 20-Million-Gallon Pond Relining Project on May 8, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the City received and opened five basebids on June 9, 2026, summarized as follows: CATS4U, INC. – $648,089; Terracon Constructors, Inc. – $673,028; Corcus Construction Inc. – $708,370; LVI Engineering – $995,730.04; HYPER Pro Equipment & Resource Inc. – $1,582,580 (Engineer’s Estimate:
$1,150,000); and
WHEREAS, CATS4U, INC. was identified as the apparent low bidder; and WHEREAS, staff reviewed the bid, conducted due diligence, and completed reference checks, and finds CATS4U, INC. to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, the project scope includes cleaning the pond, installing a new, thicker HDPE liner with an anticipated lifespan of 25–45 years, and installing new safety fencing; and
WHEREAS, construction is planned for summer 2026, and City staff will provide construction management and inspection for the project;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA DOES HEREBY find the following:

Item #6.3.

1. Finds CATS4U, INC. to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder and awards the construction contract for its basebid with alternate in the amount of $656,489; and waives all minor bid irregularities.

2. Approves a construction budget not to exceed $725,000 that includes a 10% contingency for change orders of $ 68,511; and allows the Public Works Director to negotiate change orders within this amount.

3. Authorizes the City Manager to award the construction contract to CATS4U, INC. for its basebid with alternate in the amount not to exceed $725,000 for completion of the 20-Million-Gallon Pond Relining Project, conditioned upon the contractor providing all documents in satisfaction of the bid award requirements.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this the 14th day of July , 2026. I, YUDIANA GALVAN, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA, HEREBY CERTIFY the foregoing resolution was introduced and passed at a regular meeting of the Calistoga City Council by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
______________________________ __________________________ Yudiana Galvan, City Clerk Donald Williams, Mayor
Item #6.3.

(‘nMTDAl‘T
HVIII Ill-Iv! I v.1 vvliuiulvwl Ive.
2026 DUNAWEALWASTEWATERTREATMENTPLANTZOMGEFFLUENTSTORAGEPOND RELININGPROJECT, PROJECTNO. 265567
THISCONTRACTFORCONSTRUCTIONis made and entered into this day of , 2026 municipal corporation. (hereinafter ”Citv")
and CATSSlllJl Inc, a California corporation, located at 13503 Healdsburg Ave, Healdsburg. CA 95448, (hereinafter referred to as ”Contractor”).

The City and the Contractor agree as follows:
(1) CONTRACTSUM: The City agrees to pay, and the Contractor agrees to accept, in full payment for the above work, the sum of Six Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Eighty—Ninedollars ($648,089.00) isto be paid in accordance with the Contract Documents. (2) COMPLIANCEWITH LAW:The City is a public agency. All provisions of law applicable to public contracts are a part of this contract to the same extent as though set forth herein and will be complied with by the Contractor.
(3) CONTRACTDOCUMENTS:The following Contract Documents relating to this Contract for Construction are hereby made a part of and incorporated by reference into this Agreement: The Notice Inviting Bids, information for Bidders, Contract Proposal, Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Payment Bond, General Conditions, Supplemental Conditions, Special Provisions, Technical Specifications, State of California Department of Transportation Standard I-ul‘v‘l- a re, ,L, '57,, n,,!,,, is, F_A_A .2A_L PL___J-__I_ Plans and bpecmcatrons, ZUZD ealtlon, LIIYOl' banta K053 UESIgn anu LOHSII'UCIIOH DIBHUBHJS, most recent version, the Project Plans, duly issued addenda, duly issued interpretations, approved change orders, preliminary construction schedule, Contractor’s guarantee and bond, and supplemental agreements, certi?cations, and endorsements applicable to this work, with all modifications incorporated in said documents prior to receipt of the Contract Proposals. Any work called for in one contract document not mentioned in another is to be performed and raw”; (‘nnfrari- CACbutcu til: Dalllc aa II IIICIILIUIICH "I all \lell-l GUI. ”Ukulllhllkao This Agreement (including all documents referred to above and incorporated herein) represents the entire and integrated Agreement between City and Contractor for the Project and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral. instrument, as provided in the General
Conditions.

Contractors are required by law to be licensed and regulated by the Contractor’s State License Board which hasjurisdiction to investigate complaints against contractors if a complaint regarding a patent act or omission is ?led within four years of the date of the alleged violation. ‘l‘G05/661211
Item #6.3.

_-"lu- -r-—-_ l
ar-
"I : Lulu-Ill II'JLCI. I H I:— :I
”.m'é-L-lia-IH
I
-?-Jl—|_:-'1 _I_'I'I
-—I-Ir---_—E:u inn——
WITHIN-A? Ital."- mu'nzi-‘E-iLIBL III-3mm
...I.r.ll-.lh..lu....n.¢.s.-
—...-__-._..._ ._“__'_-.-q'h._-.-=hIT'FI ll —- --u- !‘| lvr' -'-:- m1- IT'L'IJII.
l._-..—
*— _-l'
m?i'li?'??"
Iii—f II-IItem #6.3.

"AH-9"
{12-12114
gH-rhaJI‘I-‘E-ln-??-r
I-n.r-_.:-— H :I LI-WIH-..-r--= = zre—A-
—_-— - 1--
ii?-hl-IIJQHIE-aJ-ILHr-ul‘ji-Imh'mnnr
-__.-hI_—-I—‘-uumul-
--———-- "9"... ‘ v u. _ p
I'm]
JE- ‘-
'
Item #6.3.

ALH" RNIAA
th.
ygnmm.’ V
a
Item #6.3.

City of Calistoga

STAFF REPORT
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: David Fradelizio, Deputy Public Works Director
Meeting: City Council - Regular Meeting - Jul 14 2026
Subject: Adoption of the Senate Bill 1 (SB1) Project List for Fiscal Year 2026/27 DESCRIPTION:

Adoption of the Senate Bill 1 (SB1) Project List for Fiscal Year 2026/27 to address basic road maintenance needs on local roads and state highways.

RECOMMENDATION:

Consider Adopting the Resolution
SUMMARY:

Senate Bill 1 (SB 1):

On April 28, 2017, the Governor signed Senate Bill 1 (SB1) to address basic road maintenance needs on local roads and state highways. SB 1 increases the fuel excise taxes and vehicle registration fees with an annual inflation adjustment in future years. The funds are for eligible street improvement projects that address maintenance, rehabilitation and critical safety projects on local streets.

In order to be eligible for continued SB1 funding, local agencies are required to submit to the CTC on or before July 1 of every calendar year a resolution adopting a list of proposed projects planned to be constructed the next fiscal year using SB1 funding. This will be an ongoing annual requirement.

The recommended SB1 work plan shows several projects and has more costs than funding. This is so we can fund different projects and can be nimble and flexible going forward.

SB1 requires that agencies provide an annual local match, from general fund revenues, called Maintenance of Effort (MOE) to be compliant with funding requirements. The city met its SB1 MOE obligation and spent a total of $273,756 on street crew and staffing expenditures.

The City of Calistoga is anticipated to receive approximately $147,350 in SB 1 funding for Fiscal Year 2026-27. The proposed FY 2026-27 SB 1 Street Improvement Project List identifies eligible street maintenance and rehabilitation projects developed using the City's 2022 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report to help preserve roadway infrastructure, improve safety, and maintain mobility.

The proposed work plan includes multiple eligible projects with estimated costs that exceed the available SB 1 funding, allowing the City flexibility to adjust project priorities and utilize available funding as opportunities arise throughout the fiscal year.

Item #6.4.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The City is required to maintain a minimum local Maintenance of Effort (MOE) expenditure of $273,756 for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to remain eligible for SB 1 funding. The proposed FY 2026-27 Public Works Streets Division budget includes General Fund appropriations exceeding $500,000, which satisfies the MOE requirement. Adoption of this resolution does not appropriate funds or authorize construction of any specific project. Rather, it establishes the City's eligibility to receive SB 1 funding and identifies projects that may be eligible for reimbursement through SB 1 and other available transportation funding sources.

CEQA STATUS:

The recommended actions described in this report are not in-and-of-themselves a “project” pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378) since they do not result in a physical change in the environment. Furthermore, individual projects will be required to complete their own CEQA.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Senate Bill 1 - FY 2026-27 Project List - Reso Attach 1 Senate Bill 1 - FY 2026-27 Project List - Exhibit A Attach 2 APPROVAL(S):

Derek Rayner, Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved - Jul 02 2026 Connie Cardenas, Admin. Services Director Approved - Jul 02 2026 Mitch Celaya, City Manager Approved - Jul 05 2026
Yudiana Galvan, City of Calistoga | City Clerk Approved - Jul 07 2026 Item #6.4.

RESOLUTION 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA, COUNTY OF NAPA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ADOPTING SENATE BILL 1 (SB1) STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LIST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/27 TO MAINTAIN

COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROGRAM AND DETERMINNING THAT THE ACTION

AUTHORIZED BY THIS RESOLUTION ARE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City/County are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, Calistoga must adopt a list of projects proposed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1 by resolution, which must include a description, location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, Calistoga will receive an estimated $147,350 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2026-27 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the tenth year in which Calistoga is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable Calistoga to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and WHEREAS, Calistoga has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities/the project list; and WHEREAS, Calistoga used the 2022 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used to improve the City’s PCI; and
WHEREAS, the 2023 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that Calistoga’s streets and roads are in an “at-risk” condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into a “good” condition; and WHEREAS, the SB 1 funding will help Calistoga rehabilitate critical streets this year and numerous similar projects into the future with a focus on safety and basic maintenance; and

Item #6.4.

Resolution No. 2026-XXX

WHEREAS, the required FY 26/27 MOE for SB1 is $273,756. MOE is included in the General Fund portion of the Public Works Streets Division Account No. 01-4122- 4301 thru 4821, proposed FY 26/27 funding of over $500,000; and WHEREAS, the projects anticipated to be funded by SB1 revenues are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 because they are repair, maintenance or minor alteration of existing facilities involving no or negligible expansion of use beyond that which presently exists; and WHEREAS, the proposed SB1 projects will comply with the requirements under the CEQA (California Code Sections 21000 et seq.; as implemented through California Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000 et seq.); and WHEREAS, the Calistoga City Council has considered all information related to this matter, as presented at a public meeting of the City Council, including any supporting reports by City staff, and any information provided during the public meeting.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA DOES HEREBY find the following:

1. The City Council hereby finds that the facts set forth in the recitals to this Resolution are true and correct and establishes the factual basis for the City Council’s adoption of this Resolution.

2. The City Council finds that the projects anticipated to be funded by SB 1 revenues are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 because they are repair, maintenance or minor alteration of existing facilities involving no or negligible expansion of use beyond that which presently exists.

3. The City Council hereby adopts the FY 2026/27 SB 1 project list for the City of Calistoga as set forth in “Exhibit A” and authorizes the Public Works Director to file the list with CTC in accordance with SB 1 guidelines.

4. The City Council hereby reinstates a list of previously approved and adopted projects as set forth in “Exhibit A”. With the relisting of these projects in the adopted fiscal year resolution, the City is reaffirming to the public and the State our intent to fund these projects with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues.

5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

Item #6.4.

Resolution No. 2026-XXX

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of July, 2026. I,

YUDIANA GALVAN, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA, HEREBY CERTIFY the foregoing resolution was introduced and passed at a regular meeting of the Calistoga City Council by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
____________________________ __________________________ Yudiana Galvan, City Clerk Donald Williams, Mayor
Item #6.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

EXHIBIT A
SB 1 PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
Project Name Begin End Surface Type Project Description Estimated Cost Project Schedule Life Expectancy Washington Street Pavement Repair Lincoln Avenue Berry Street AC Pavement reconstruction, overlay, repair $600,000 03/27-06/27 20 Year Previously proposed and adopted projects:

Project Name Begin End Surface Type Project Description Estimated Cost Project Schedule Life Expectancy Lake Street Pavement Rehabilitation Grant Street Lincoln Avenue AC Pavement reconstruction, overlay, repair $1,775,000 07/25-10/25 20 Year Brannan Street and Lincoln Avenue
Crosswalk Improvements Project
Brannan Street and Lincoln
Avenue Intersection
Brannan Street and Lincoln
Avenue Intersection N/A
Improve crosswalk safety and install
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
system
$500,000 07/25-10/25 30 years
Washington Street Pavement Repair North Oak Berry Street AC Pavement reconstruction, overlay, repair $1,200,000 03/27-06/27 20 Year Grant Street Garnet Creek Ct City Limits AC Pavement reconstruction, overlay, repair $1,200,000 03/27-06/27 20 Year Item #6.4.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Clyde Long
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 5:27 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Agenda Items 6.4 and 8.2
As a Washington Street resident, I have these comments
about the FY 2026-27 repair projects for Washington
Street:
 Will the Lincoln to Berry Street repairs happen only if the Berry to North Oak Street project is chosen over
the Grant Street project?
 For safety, the Lincoln to Berry Street segment should include drainage, gutter and curb repairs at the
derelict Second Street intersection.
 Both Washington Street projects are long overdue and
deserve the highest priority--for residents and visitors alike.

Clyde Long
Item #6.4.

City of Calistoga

STAFF REPORT
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Matt McCaffrey, Police Chief
Meeting: City Council - Regular Meeting - Jul 14 2026
Subject: Final Phase of Range Improvement Project
DESCRIPTION:

Council will consider approving a contract with T&S West for the construction of a canopy at the Police Department Range.

RECOMMENDATION:

Consider Adopting the Resolution
SUMMARY:

This is the final phase of the range improvement project which will add a roof that will provide cover from the elements for staff and equipment.

ANALYSIS:

The Calistoga Police Department has a range on city-owned property located in the unincorporated area of Napa County. The range consists of some earthen berms, stand-alone targets and some metal storage containers. The range has no place for staff to place equipment on, load/unload magazines, clean their weapons or get shelter from the rain or sun. The first phase of this project was the construction of a cement pad; the second phase was the purchase and installation of six (6) shooting benches; this third and final phase will be to add a roof to provide cover from the elements for staff and equipment.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The cost of the roof and supporting structure, not to exceed $50,000, will be paid from the COPS Fund via a transfer from account #141-4700-4799-00000 to the fixed assets account #165-3000- 3299-00000 and the improvements account #165-1000-1515-00000.

CEQA STATUS:

Not Applicable
ATTACHMENT(S):

Draft Resolution - Range Roof
Proposal Scope - Calistoga Gun Range Canopy (05-01-26)
APPROVAL(S):

Item #6.5.

Connie Cardenas, Admin. Services Director Approved - Jun 16 2026 Mitch Celaya, City Manager Approved - Jul 05 2026
Yudiana Galvan, City of Calistoga | City Clerk Approved - Jul 07 2026 Item #6.5.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

ADOPTED XXXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH T&S BUILDING

CONTRACTOR FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A ROOF AND SUPPORTING

STRUCTURE FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT RANGE
WHEREAS, the City of Calistoga, Police Department operates a firearms range on City property in the unincorporated area of Napa County; and WHEREAS, the property consists of earthen berms, stand-alone targets, and some metal storage containers; and
WHEREAS, the range has no place for staff to place equipment on, load/unload magazines, clean their weapons or get shelter from the rain or sun; and WHEREAS, the final phase of this project will be the construction of a roof and supporting structure; and
WHEREAS, the cost of the roof and supporting structure, not to exceed $50,000, will be paid from the COPS Fund via a transfer from account #141-4700-4799-00000 to the fixed assets account #165-3000-3299-00000 and the improvements account #165- 1000-1515-00000.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Calistoga, that the City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into a contract with T & S West General Engineering & Building Contractor to construct the cement pad for a cost not to exceed $50,000.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all terms, conditions, and covenants of said Agreement be, and the same are, hereby approved, ratified, and confirmed.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of July 2026. I, YUDIANA GALVAN, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA, HEREBY CERTIFY the foregoing resolution was introduced and passed at a regular meeting of the Calistoga City Council by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
_________________________ ___________________________
Yudiana Galvan, City Clerk Donald Williams, Mayor
Item #6.5.

U

BID PROPOSAL
Project Description: City of Calistoga - Police Department Build Custom Canopy at Police Gun Range
Date: May 1, 2026
Contractor: T & S WEST
T & S West (T & S) is pleased to submit a proposal for the above-referenced project. Scope based on job walk with Sg. Rudy Alaniz.

Proposal: Bid with Prevailing Wage Rates and Bond Included ITEM DESCRIPTION Quantity UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE
1 Custom Canopy 1 LS $ 44,350.00 $ 44,350.00
ESTIMATE TOTAL $ 44,350.00
ScopeBuild New 20’ x 30’ Custom Built Wood Canopy on Existing Concrete Pad Inclusions/Clarifications:

1. Custom Fabricated Shade Structure20’ Wide x 30’ Long a. 4”x 6” Vertical Posts (10ea) spaced at 10’ around perimeter, mounted to existing concrete slab
b. 2” x 10” Roof Joists at 24” offsets
c. 2” x 8” Beams around perimeter
i. Metal Edge
d. 4” x 4” Kickers at 2ea corners for strength
e. Roof 8’ Tall on high side with 1:12 slope to back drainage f. .5” CDX plywood for roof
i. Vapor Barrier included
g. Install Metal or Polycarbonate Roof Panels – 600 SF
h. Stain posts, interior plywood ceiling, trim boards, joists, beams all 1ea color Notes:
- This proposal is based on performing all work in one move-in for all operations, during normal working hours 7am-4pm, Monday through Friday, unless otherwise stated above. We would be happy to discuss alternatives for scheduling if other requests are needed. - Owner to provide staging area directly adjacent for work.

T & S West
P O Box 1592 Linden, CA 95236 Office: (209) 942-1360 Fax: (209) 942-1368 CSLB # 939001 Expires 10/31/2025, A & B Licences, DIR# 1000011948 Expires 06/30/2025 Item #6.5.

T & S West
P O Box 1592 Linden, CA 95236 Office: (209) 942-1360 Fax: (209) 942-1368 CSLB # 939001 Expires 10/31/2025, A & B Licences, DIR# 1000011948 Expires 06/30/2025 - The owner must ensure that work areas are clear and that heavy equipment can access the site for delivery and operations before mobilization and throughout the project. - Bid subject to work areas being accessible to personnel, material, and equipment. - Owner expressly acknowledges that Contractor is a licensed contractor authorized to perform work provided in this Contract and that the Contractor is not an engineer or a design consultant.

Proposals made by Contractor with respect to work to be performed are made solely for the consideration of Owner and Owner’s design engineer or design consultant, who shall be solely responsible for determining whether any such work proposed by Contractor is, or will be, adequate to satisfy the needs and or purposes of the Owner. Except as expressly provided in this Contract, no warranty or representation of any kind or nature with respect to any such proposal.

Warranty with respect to fitness for any purpose or use is expressly disclaimed to the fullest extent of the law.

Exclusions:
• Walls, insulation, drywall, and texturing
• This proposal specifically excludes: shop drawings; engineering or architectural services; as-built plans; engineered survey; all permits and fees; inspection fees; costs for testing, handling, and/or removing any hazardous/contaminated materials.
• Items of work not specifically mentioned above and in proposal.

Travis Collins
T & S West
209.942.1360 Office
805.215.8694 Cell
[email protected]
Acceptance of Proposal: The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. I understand and agree to the terms and conditions on the following page(s) of this proposal.

Authorized Owner Signature ______________________________________ Date ______________________________________
Item #6.5.

City of Calistoga

STAFF REPORT
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Rachel Stepp, Deputy City Manager
Meeting: City Council - Regular Meeting - Jul 14 2026
Subject: Proposal from Hearts and Hands Preschool to Utilize a Fairgrounds Residence
DESCRIPTION:

Consider Providing Direction Regarding a Proposal from Hearts and Hands Preschool to Utilize the Residential Structure Located Adjacent to the Calistoga Fairgrounds RV Park RECOMMENDATION:

Receive the staff report, discuss the proposal, and provide direction to staff by taking one of the following actions:

1. Direct the City Manager to negotiate the terms of a lease or license agreement with Hearts and Hands Preschool for use of the residential structure, with any agreement conditioned upon Hearts and Hands being solely responsible for all costs associated with obtaining permits, completing required improvements, and bringing the building into compliance with all applicable building, fire, licensing, accessibility, and other regulatory requirements, subject to future City Council approval.

2. Direct staff to conduct additional analysis or return with additional information before further consideration of the proposal.

3. Determine not to pursue the proposal.

SUMMARY:

Hearts and Hands Preschool has approached the City regarding the potential use of the residential structure located adjacent to the Calistoga Fairgrounds RV Park for preschool operations.

The structure has historically served as a single-family residence and is located on property owned by the City as part of the Calistoga Fairgrounds. Hearts and Hands proposes to utilize the existing residence and associated outdoor areas to operate a licensed preschool.

Recognizing the importance of childcare services within the community, staff initiated a preliminary review of the proposal to evaluate whether the existing structure and its location on the Fairgrounds property are appropriate for the proposed use. The preliminary staff review included input from the Planning and Building Department, Fire Department, Fairgrounds Department, and other City departments regarding regulatory requirements, operational impacts, facility improvements, emergency management considerations, and potential fiscal implications.

The purpose of this staff report is to provide the City Council with the results of the preliminary staff review and to seek policy direction regarding whether to proceed with negotiations for a potential agreement, conduct additional analysis, or discontinue consideration of the proposal.

Item #8.1.

ANALYSIS:

The preliminary staff review found that the proposal presents both opportunities and challenges.

While the proposed use would provide an important community benefit by expanding childcare opportunities for local families, it would also require substantial building modifications, compliance with multiple regulatory requirements, and consideration of operational impacts to the Fairgrounds.

The following sections summarize the results of the preliminary staff review.

Building, Fire, and Licensing Requirements
The existing structure was constructed and has historically functioned as a single-family residence.

Based on information provided by Hearts and Hands Preschool, the organization is licensed for up to 30 children and currently serves approximately 15-17 children ages 2-4.

As part of the preliminary staff review, the Building Division and Fire Department evaluated the applicable occupancy classifications under the California Building Code. Based on the proposed operation, the structure would likely require reclassification from its existing residential occupancy to a Group I-4 Institutional Day Care occupancy under the California Building Code. However, if the child care rooms are located at the exit discharge level and each room has a direct exit to the exterior, the facility may qualify as a Group E occupancy. The final occupancy classification determination would occur during the building permit review process. Regardless of the final classification, both occupancy types share many of the same building, fire, accessibility, and life safety requirements identified through the preliminary staff review.

Indoor and Outdoor Space Requirements
The minimum licensing and building standards applicable to the proposed use include:
 A minimum of 35 square feet of usable indoor activity space per occupant, based on the facility's licensed capacity.
 A minimum of 75 square feet of dedicated outdoor play space per licensed child.

Hallways, bathrooms, kitchens, storage rooms, isolation areas, and other support spaces do not count toward the required indoor activity space. As a result, the building's gross square footage does not necessarily reflect the number of occupants the facility may be licensed to serve. The outdoor play area must be enclosed by a secure fence with self-closing and self-latching gates and be accessible in accordance with applicable licensing and accessibility requirements.

These requirements, together with the building's layout and available site area, will influence the licensed capacity that can ultimately be accommodated within the existing structure and may require modifications to both the building and the surrounding site.

Required Building and Site Improvements
The preliminary staff review indicates that significant improvements would likely be required before the structure could be occupied as a licensed preschool. Based on the city staff evaluations, potential improvements include:
 Reclassification of the building from a residential occupancy to a childcare occupancy.  Installation of a commercial NFPA 13 automatic fire sprinkler system.  Installation of a monitored commercial fire alarm system.  ADA-compliant parking, accessible path of travel, accessible entrance, and accessible restroom improvements.
 Accessible kitchen facilities.
 Interior reconfiguration to accommodate preschool operations.

Item #8.1.

 Construction of a compliant outdoor play area.
 Installation of a new dedicated water lateral, water meter, and backflow prevention assembly to provide metered domestic water service, support the required fire protection system, and establish separate water and sewer utility service for the facility.  Emergency egress improvements.
 Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) compliance upgrades due to the property's location within a High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.
 Building, Fire Department, and California Community Care Licensing inspections and approvals prior to occupancy.

In addition to physical improvements, the Fire Department identified operational requirements associated with childcare facilities, including emergency evacuation planning, wildfire evacuation procedures, transportation planning, parent reunification procedures, defensible space maintenance, and ongoing fire and life safety inspections.

While the final scope of work would be determined through the design and building permit review process, the Building Official has provided a preliminary planning-level estimate that the improvements necessary to convert the structure for preschool use could range from approximately $300,000 to $400,000, with an estimated construction duration of approximately six months following permit approval. Additionally, the Public Works Director indicated that the water utility infrastructure improvement would cost approximately $35,000.

It is staff's understanding that Hearts and Hands Preschool would be responsible for funding and completing all improvements necessary to bring the structure into compliance with applicable building, fire, accessibility, licensing, and other regulatory requirements.

Fairgrounds Operational Considerations
The RV Park experiences regular vehicle and pedestrian activity associated with overnight guests, vendors, service providers, and Fairgrounds events. During races, rodeos, fairs, festivals, weddings, carnivals, and other special events, activity within the RV Park increases as guests, vendors, participants, and support personnel access the site. If a preschool were established at this location, regular morning and afternoon drop-off and pick-up activities would take place within the same operational area. As part of the preliminary staff review, staff identified circulation, traffic management, and coordination of site activities as considerations for City Council's evaluation.

The Fairgrounds also hosts activities involving large crowds, equipment movement, temporary structures, amplified sound, extended operating hours, and event setup and teardown operations. If the proposal were to move forward, coordination between Fairgrounds operations and preschool activities would be necessary to ensure the continued operation of both uses. These operational considerations may include site access, circulation, scheduling, and communication during periods of increased activity at the Fairgrounds.

The proposed location is also adjacent to areas identified for potential future RV sites and lodgingrelated development. The City Council may also wish to consider how the proposed use could influence future planning and operational flexibility within this portion of the Fairgrounds property.

As part of the preliminary staff review, staff, in consultation with the City Attorney's Office, evaluated the proposed use for consistency with the historical use provisions contained in the Purchase and Sale Agreement between the County of Napa and the City of Calistoga. Based on that review, staff determined that operation of a preschool at this location would be consistent with the historical use requirements of the Agreement.

Item #8.1.

Emergency Management Considerations
The Calistoga Fairgrounds serves an important role in the City's emergency preparedness and response framework. During emergencies, the property may be used for evacuation support, responder housing, incident command, equipment staging, and other emergency response functions.

The RV Park area is particularly valuable during emergency activations because it can accommodate emergency personnel, responder camps, temporary housing, and support operations.

Introducing permanent preschool use in this area would require careful coordination to address emergency evacuation procedures, parent reunification, security, site access, and interaction with emergency responders during activations.

These considerations do not necessarily preclude the proposed use; however, they highlight operational issues that would require ongoing planning and coordination should the proposal move forward.

Summary of Preliminary Staff Review
Review Area Preliminary Findings
Occupancy Classification
Based on the proposed operation, the structure
would likely require reclassification from its
existing residential occupancy to a Group I-4
Institutional Day Care occupancy, although the
final occupancy classification would be
determined during the building permit review
process.

Indoor Activity Space
Minimum of 35 square feet of usable indoor
activity space per occupant, based on the
facility's licensed capacity. Hallways, kitchens,
bathrooms, storage rooms, isolation areas, and
similar support spaces do not count toward this
requirement.

Outdoor Play Area
Minimum of 75 square feet of dedicated outdoor
play space per child required. The play area
must be enclosed by a secure fence with selfclosing and self-latching gates and comply with applicable California Community Care Licensing
standards.

Fire Protection
Commercial NFPA 13 automatic fire sprinkler
system and monitored fire alarm system likely
required.

Accessibility
ADA-compliant parking, accessible path of
travel, accessible entrance, restroom facilities,
kitchen improvements, and an accessible
outdoor play area are likely required.

Building Improvements
Significant remodeling anticipated, including
interior reconfiguration, emergency egress
improvements, water service upgrades, and
Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) compliance
improvements.

Item #8.1.

Review Area Preliminary Findings
Childcare Licensing
Continued compliance with California
Community Care Licensing requirements,
including coordination with Community Care
Licensing and successful Building and Fire
inspections prior to occupancy.

Estimated Improvement Cost
Preliminary planning-level estimate of $300,000
to $400,000, and $35,000 for water utility work,
subject to design, engineering, and permit
review.

Estimated Construction Duration Approximately six months following permit approval.

Fairgrounds Operations
Considerations include circulation, traffic
management, event coordination, future
operational flexibility, and compatibility with
ongoing Fairgrounds operations.

Emergency Management
Considerations include emergency evacuation
procedures, parent reunification, emergency
access, site security, and coordination with
emergency response operations.

Financial Responsibility
It is staff's understanding that Hearts and
Hands Preschool would be responsible for
funding all improvements necessary to convert
the building and obtain the required approvals
for occupancy.

The preliminary staff review identified building, fire, licensing, infrastructure, operational, and emergency management considerations associated with the proposal. The information summarized above is intended to assist the City Council in evaluating the proposal and providing direction regarding the appropriate next steps.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

If the City Council directs staff to move forward with negotiations, it is staff’s understanding that Hearts and Hands Preschool would be responsible for funding and completing all modifications, improvements, permits, inspections, utility infrastructure work, and other actions necessary to bring the structure into compliance for preschool use and obtain the required approvals for occupancy.

The City would not be responsible for funding the building or site improvements associated with the proposed preschool use. However, if the proposal moves forward, the City would incur costs for staff and City Attorney time to negotiate, draft, review, and finalize a lease or license agreement for City Council consideration.

CEQA STATUS:

The City Council’s action to provide policy direction is not a project under CEQA (Section 15378) because it does not commit the City to a definite course of action. Any required environmental review would occur if the proposal moves forward.

APPROVAL(S):

Item #8.1.

Connie Cardenas, Admin. Services Director Approved - Jul 02 2026 Mitch Celaya, City Manager Approved - Jul 05 2026
Yudiana Galvan, City of Calistoga | City Clerk Approved - Jul 07 2026 Item #8.1.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Suzy Q
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 11:24 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Preschool does not fit the use
I support kids, but the fairgrounds doesn't seem appropriate for a preschool and I can’t believe you are even thinking of putting it in the RV park.

The RV park is designed as a destination for vacationers and is heavily used during large community events that bring increased traffic, noise, and activity. Those conditions don't appear to be the best environment for small children with people and large vehicles coming and going. Preschools benefit from stable, predictable surroundings with safe traffic patterns. Have you looked at the entry and exit for this? Will it impede the park? Will the school put in its own entry and exit? Before committing public space I’d like to know how this school will stay afloat. Will they expect to be supported from our tax dollars? From donations? For how long? How many full time kids go to this school and what is the monthly revenue? The numbers reported in the Press Democrat don’t seem to make stable financial sense. If this preschool is on city property, we deserve to see the finances. I don’t see how it will be sustained.

I have so many questions. How will traffic be managed during major events or when the RV park is typically busy? The Press Democrat mentions emergency situations.

Has the preschool compared this site with other potential sites? What are the pros and cons of each site? What is the cost? I thought they could not afford to stay a float but now they can put hundreds of thousands of dollars towards construction and pay a lease? What are they paying now? What were they paying last year when they were having financial trouble? What does the profit and loss look like? What does it look like with construction, paying utilities and an average lease to the city? Does Community Care Licensing approve of a preschool being yards away from a race track? Will there be a CEQA review for a new preschool next to RV traffic and a race track? Will the school being there inhibit events? Inhibit other businesses? Inhibit the sale of alcohol on the property? I ask you why do you think this is the best option?
What additional costs will Calistoga taxpayers incur?
Square peg, round hole.

As Councilmen, we rely on you to ask the hard questions. Even when your “Hearts” are involved.

Susan Reghetti
Item #8.1.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Domenico Tallerico
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2026 2:33 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Agenda Item 8.1
Dear City Council,
This proposal should be rejected completely and categorically for the following main reasons:

1. Estimated costs of at least $300,000 to $400,000 by a private organization that itself acknowledges the lack financially viability is a foolish risk to take.

Note its own board acknowledged its financial weakness by finally shutting it down. Note further that it cannot afford to pay market rate rent. And finally note that there are at least another $35,000 in direct city costs. Again, expect all these costs to end up higher than stated given a financially unsound organization, the way government works (both local and state), and inflation.

2. Staff state the “structure has historically served as a single-family residence.” How a private “licensed preschool” can fit any definition of a historical use makes the term “historical use” meaningless despite the alleged position of the City Attorney. Perhaps the Napa County Attorney should be consulted on this matter before the city is embroiled in a possible legal dispute?

3. The vast amount of space required adversely affects fairgrounds emergency uses, as acknowledged in the staff report, and take away from the historically profitable RV park. The city has had several recent fires where the fairgrounds and RV park, in particular, were indispensable. The 35 square feet of “usable” indoor space per occupants plus 75 square feet of “dedicated” outdoor space per child is over 1000 SF indoor and 2250 SF outdoor, at the minimum assuming 30 children. And these are likely the minimum space requirements.

Item #8.1.

2 4. Safety would be seriously compromised for both the children and all other users as mentioned in the staff report and should, in fact, be simple common sense.

5. There are many businesses already providing the proposed preschool services in the immediate area.

6. The city has far more pressing matters than this one that should be the focus of the City Council such as the fairgrounds financial stability, high water rates, and city infrastructure.

7. Where in the recent survey was this proposed use noted and to what extent?
Thank you,
Dom Tallerico
Item #8.1.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Douglas Allan
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 5:17 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Public comment - item 8.1
Mayor Williams
Vice-Mayor Gift
Council members: Cooper, Eisenberg, Lopez-Ortega
City Manager Celaya
Fairgrounds Director Wright
I am echoing a voice shared by many residents regarding this item on tonight’s agenda. We need a master plan and in the absence of an approved plan, we need to follow the already agreed upon process to get to that plan. I have nothing against Hearts and Hands. They are great! But we need to be more thorough about how the 72 acre parcel is going to be utilized before any further permanent decisions are made. Stop “shooting from the hip.” The council reviewed and approved work plans for various Advisory Committees at the Jan 27, 2026 council meeting. At this meeting the Fairgrounds Advisory Committee (FAC) was approved as a standing committee and the FAC work plan was also reviewed and approved. It is a comprehensive work plan and provides specific steps outlining how the overall fairgrounds ‘revitalization’ would be addressed. Item 1 of the approved work plan states:
“1. Collaborate with City staff in the review and selection of Consultants (Sponsorship/Grant Consultant and Master Plan Consultant), including evaluating proposals, participating in interviews, and ensuring the selected firm(s) aligns with the community priorities and Council direction.”
Developing, implementing and adhering to a ‘master plan’ should be the top priority.

However, to my knowledge, there’s been no reportable progress towards that goal. I have inquired at multiple FAC meetings about the status of this item and have never received a response. The City continues to receive various requests which should be outlined and addressed by that work plan - e.g., golf course partnerships, RV park upgrades, etc. The proposed relocation of Hearts and Hands Preschool is another clear example. If a Master Plan was approved and being followed, it would address the use of existing structures, include timelines for renovation or replacement of buildings and much more. Unless there is a comprehensive master plan, Council should not approve use of the residence. Council should request that the approved work plan be implemented and followed, beginning with the item 1 as outlined above.

Item #8.1.

2 It is imperative that the Council approved FAC work plan/goals be followed to set a progressive path towards a successful project that will affect Calistogans and neighboring communities for decades to come.

Douglas Allan
Calistoga Resident
Item #8.1.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Lana Richardson
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 4:31 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Public comment - item 8.1
Mayor Williams
Vice-Mayor Gift
Council members: Cooper, Eisenberg, Lopez-Ortega
City Manager Celaya
Fairgrounds Director Wright
The council reviewed and approved work plans for various Advisory Committees at the Jan 27, 2026 council meeting. At this meeting the Fairgrounds Advisory Committee (FAC) was approved as a standing committee and the FAC work plan was also reviewed and approved. It is a comprehensive work plan and provides specific steps outlining how the overall fairgrounds ‘revitalization’ would be addressed. Item 1 of the approved work plan states:
“1. Collaborate with City staff in the review and selection of Consultants (Sponsorship/Grant Consultant and Master Plan Consultant), including evaluating proposals, participating in interviews, and ensuring the selected firm(s) aligns with the community priorities and Council direction.”
Developing, implementing and adhering to a ‘master plan’ should be the top priority. However, to my knowledge, there’s been no reportable progress towards that goal. I have inquired at multiple FAC meetings about the status of this item and have never received a response. The City continues to receive various requests which should be outlined and addressed by that work plan - e.g., golf course partnerships, RV park upgrades, etc. The proposed relocation of Hearts and Hands Preschool is another clear example. If a Master Plan was approved and being followed, it would address the use of existing structures, include timelines for renovation or replacement of buildings and much more. Unless there is a comprehensive master plan, Council should not approve use of the residence. Council should request that the approved work plan be implemented and followed, beginning with the item 1 as outlined above.

It is imperative that the Council approved FAC work plan/goals be followed to set a progressive path towards a successful project that will affect Calistogans and neighboring communities for decades to come.

Lana Richardson
Calistoga
Item #8.1.

City of Calistoga

STAFF REPORT
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Derek Rayner, Public Works Director/City Engineer Meeting: City Council - Regular Meeting - Jul 14 2026
Subject: Provide Background and Discuss Paving Grant or Washington DESCRIPTION:

To discuss Grant and Washington Street paving projects with city council to seek direction on selecting which Project to bid/construct next winter/summer RECOMMENDATION:

Consider Discussing the Item and Providing Staff Direction SUMMARY:

The purpose of this item is to request City Council direction on selecting the next priority collector-street pavement project for staff to prepare for bidding and construction: Washington Street or Grant Street. There is not enough budget to do both. Both collector corridors have very poor pavement conditions, significant traffic volumes, and are identified as high-priority segments in the City’s Pavement Management Program (PMP).

The Washington Street project (Berry to N. Oak) consists of pavement rehabilitation along with major underground utility replacements, including water main and recycled-water pipelines, ADA curb ramp upgrades, and limited sidewalk, curb, and gutter replacements. The Grant Street project (Garnett Creek Court to the City Limits near Myrtledale Road) includes full pavement reconstruction, construction of a new separated multi-use pathway required by ordinance, drainage improvements near Greenwood/Myrtledale, and potential installation of speed cushions consistent with the City’s traffic-calming policy.

Both projects are engineered but require specification updates before advertisement. Staff is seeking Council direction on which project should be bid and constructed first.

ANALYSIS:

Project Status
Both the Washington Street and Grant Street projects have completed engineering plans; however, staff still need to update technical specifications and assemble full bid packages. Staff anticipates being able to bid either project this winter, which typically provides the most competitive pricing, followed by a request for construction award, and construction next spring/summer 2027.

Both projects are complex and present unique challenges, which are summarized below.

Washington Street Project Challenges
Item #8.2.

A 2022 Safe Routes to School (SRST) walk-audit conducted by the Napa County Office of Education identified Washington Street between Berry and North Oak as a key student travel corridor. The report recommended upgrading the corridor to Class II bike lanes.

The current engineered plans (completed in 2020) identify Washington Street as a Class III shared-lane bicycle route. Upgrading to Class II bike lanes at this stage would:
 Remove approximately nine (9) parking spaces between Berry and Lake OR
 Require roadway widening due to insufficient existing width  Require redesign of construction plans, additional engineering effort, and increased project cost and schedule
Council may choose to bid the project as currently designed or direct staff to revise the plans to evaluate the Class II bike lane option. If the Class II option is preferred staff estimates another year to design and about another $35,000 to revise bid documents. Staff believes that with additional spot road widening in the existing landscape areas both parking and class II bike lanes can be accommodated.

Grant Street Project Challenges
Several parcels along Grant Street have recorded frontage/pathway deferral agreements requiring owners to contribute toward multi-use pathway improvements. The estimated value of these agreements is approximately $150,000. A previous review by the City Attorney found that the agreements contain limited and outdated language, including weak “running with the land” provisions and obligations tied to specific individuals. Enforcement may be time-consuming and uncertain.

Grant Street also includes long-standing community concerns about vehicle speeds. Following the 2020 community forum, the City evaluated traffic-calming measures, piloted speed cushions, and adopted the current Speed Cushion Policy. These cushions could be easily incorporated into the Grant Street project to mitigate community concerns.

If Council wishes to proceed with Grant Street, staff will need direction regarding whether to enforce, waive, or otherwise address the deferral agreements. The Grant Street plans do not need to be updated.

Why the Delay
Although both projects were designed several years ago, each includes elements that are complex and evolved as community concerns were raised. Additionally, the city has deliberately focused recent efforts on the PMP’s “best-first” pavement strategy, prioritizing slurry seals and overlay projects to preserve as many streets as possible before they deteriorate into full-reconstruction status. With the simpler repair projects largely complete, staff is now positioned to bring forward major reconstruction projects such as Lake Street last year, Washington Street and Grant Street.

Comparison Table
In order to compare the two projects side-by-side a comparison table is provided below:

Washington Street (Berry → N. Oak) Grant Street (Centennial → City Limits) Item #8.2.

PCI 33 (Poor) PCI 21 (Very Poor)
3–4" asphalt overlay Full reconstruction (4" AC over 12" AB) Major utility replacements (water +
recycled water)
No major utility work
ADA, curb/gutter, driveway repairs 5 ft separated multi-use pathway $2.2M project cost $1.7M project cost
Shorter segment (~1,390 ft) Longer project limits (1,580 ft) Class III shared-bike route Class I, separated pathway improves bike and pedestrian safety
Potential Class II bike lanes would
remove 9 parking spaces; widening
needed to keep parking + Bike Lanes +
Redesign
—
Traffic calming optional Traffic calming optional
— Deferred pathway agreements estimated
$150,000 of construction cost. (per
Community Forum PowerPoint slides
from 2020)
Options for Discussion

1. Direct staff to advertise either the Washington Street or Grant Street project for construction as currently engineered.

2. Direct staff to proceed with Grant Street and return Washington Street to the design phase to evaluate adding Class II bike lanes, parking impacts, roadway widening, and redesigning the plans to bidding-level documents.

3. Provide other direction.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The FY26/27 budget has $2,350,000 (Mostly paving and some dollars for sidewalk extension) for Pavement Maintenance that these projects would utilize budget for. Only one project Washington or Grant can be accomplished with this budget. Washington would require a budget adjustment to include additional enterprise funds for both water and sewer utility improvements, estimated around $500,000 each. Additionally, if council wants to evaluate wider road staff estimates this would take an additional $35,000 to update engineering designs and require about another year to complete.

CEQA STATUS:

Both repaving projects are categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15301(b), covering minor alterations to existing public facilities.

APPROVAL(S):

Connie Cardenas, Admin. Services Director Approved - Jul 02 2026 Mitch Celaya, City Manager Approved - Jul 05 2026
Yudiana Galvan, City of Calistoga | City Clerk Approved - Jul 07 2026 Item #8.2.

Draft ATAC Letter – Grant Street Repaving Project
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
On behalf of the Calistoga Active Transportation Advisory Committee (ATAC), we respectfully express our support for prioritizing the repaving of Grant Street from approximately Centennial Circle to the city limits. This project is already identified in the City’s long-term Capital Improvement Plan, and ATAC believes advancing this work would provide important safety and mobility benefits for the community.

Grant Street serves as a major corridor for residents entering and leaving Calistoga and is regularly used by drivers, pedestrians, runners, and cyclists. The current roadway surface is potholed and uneven, creating uncomfortable conditions for people riding bicycles and potential tripping hazards for those walking or running. Repaving this section of roadway would significantly improve safety and usability for all users.

This improvement is particularly timely given nearby development that will increase activity along this corridor. The 2400 Grant Street Subdivision (TM 2023-02) will add 17 residential lots and includes construction of a Class IV multi-use pathway for pedestrians and bicyclists along Grant Street, consistent with the Calistoga Active Transportation Plan. The 2008 Grant Street project currently in progress will also contribute to increased residential activity and travel in the area.

The planned Class IV multi-use pathway represents an important safety improvement for this corridor. By providing physical separation between pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicle traffic, the pathway will create a significantly safer and more comfortable environment for people traveling outside of a car. This is especially important along Grant Street, where vehicles often travel at relatively high speeds and many residents currently feel uncomfortable walking or bicycling close to traffic. The pathway will also support broader connectivity goals, including future links to the Napa Valley Vine Trail network.

For these reasons, ATAC encourages the City Council to consider prioritizing or advancing the Grant Street repaving project within the Capital Improvement Plan. In particular, ATAC notes the following key considerations:

Safety: The current roadway condition creates challenges for pedestrians, runners, and bicyclists and will become increasingly problematic as activity along the corridor grows.

Planned Active Transportation Infrastructure: The Class IV multi-use pathway planned as part of the 2400 Grant Street project represents an important investment in safe walking and bicycling infrastructure that will benefit from an improved roadway corridor.

Future Growth: Nearby residential development, including the 2400 Grant Street subdivision and the 2008 Grant Street project, will increase vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle traffic along Grant Street.

Responsible Infrastructure Timing: Addressing pavement conditions before increased development-related traffic accelerates roadway deterioration is a fiscally responsible approach to infrastructure maintenance.

Thank you for your continued support of infrastructure improvements that enhance safety and mobility in Calistoga.

Sincerely,
Calistoga Active Transportation Advisory Committee
Item #8.2.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Lucia Ramos Perez
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 8:12 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Letter to support the bike lane on Washington street Dear Members of the Calistoga City Council,
I strongly support moving forward with the proposed bike lane on Washington Street.

My husband and I have lived in several large cities around the world, but when we decided to raise our family, we chose Calistoga because of its small-town character. We wanted our children to grow up in a place where they could safely ride their bikes to school, to friends’ houses, and around town—gaining independence and confidence, just as we did growing up.

Unfortunately, last school year, biking on Washington Street during drop-off hours became so stressful and unsafe that we had to stop riding with our children, who were 5 and 6 years old at the time. What should have been a simple and healthy way to get to school felt too dangerous.

Washington Street is a key route connecting families, Calistoga Elementary School, and the Boys & Girls Club. A dedicated bike lane would make a meaningful difference for children and parents every day, encouraging safe biking, reducing traffic around schools, and helping preserve the family-friendly community that makes Calistoga special.

I hope this project is prioritized.

Thank you for your consideration.

Lucia Ramos Perez
Lucia Ramos
Item #8.2.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Clyde Long
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 5:27 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Agenda Items 6.4 and 8.2
As a Washington Street resident, I have these comments
about the FY 2026-27 repair projects for Washington
Street:
 Will the Lincoln to Berry Street repairs happen only if the Berry to North Oak Street project is chosen over
the Grant Street project?
 For safety, the Lincoln to Berry Street segment should include drainage, gutter and curb repairs at the
derelict Second Street intersection.
 Both Washington Street projects are long overdue and
deserve the highest priority--for residents and visitors alike.

Clyde Long
Item #8.2.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Jeffrey Stambor
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 3:59 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Agenda item 8.2 in July 14, 2026 Agenda
My name is Jeffrey Stambor and I live at 1406 4th St. I am deeply concerned at the prospect of eliminating "approximately" 9 parking spaces on Washington between N. Oak and Berry. Isn't there a definitive number of affected spaces? The parking situation in this area and on adjacent areas of Lake St, 3rd St and 4th St is already heavily impacted. The new triplex at 1514 Washington will only add to the situation.

At the hearings regarding the potential impact of 1514 on area parking the Planning Commission and City Council opined that residents and visitors "just needed to figure it out". Not exactly a plan to address the issue. What's the plan to make up for those lost parking spots? Where is the parking to replace the lost spots going to appear? I am strongly against any plan for Washington St that includes a loss of parking places.

I further suggest that the parking on Washington be moved to the other side of the street. Making any turn off of 4th onto Washington is difficult due to the limited vision of oncoming traffic. Excessive speed is also an ongoing issue in the area.

Item #8.2.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From:

Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2026 11:18 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Washington Street Public Comment, Item 8.2., July 14 City Council Meeting Dear City of Calistoga Council Members,
I am writing to express my support of adding Class II bike lanes to Washington Street from Berry to North Oak with its repaving.

Bike lanes will make it safer and more comfortable for students, families, and beginner riders to bike to important community places.

When more people can bike, we improve our community's health, increase access to opportunities for people who do not drive, and encourage people to shift from car trips to bike trips, reducing traffic congestion and air pollution.

Thank you for your consideration,
Dan Wilkowsky
Napa resident and frequent visitor, diner,
Vine Trail cyclist, and shopper in Calistoga
Item #8.2.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Ana Pimsler
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2026 9:53 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Washington Street Public Comment, Item 8.2., July 14 City Council Meeting Dear City of Calistoga Council Members,
I am writing to express my support of adding Class II bike lanes to Washington Street from Berry to North Oak with its repaving.

Bike lanes will make it safer and more comfortable for students, families, and beginner riders to bike to important community spaces like schools, Logvy Park and the Community Pool, and the Boys and Girls Club. When more people are able to bike, we improve our community's health, increase access to opportunities for people who do not drive, and encourage people to shift from car trips to bike trips, reducing traffic congestion and air pollution.

Thank you for your consideration,
Ana Pimsler
CJSHS teacher

Item #8.2.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Gerardo Capiel
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2026 2:37 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Washington Street Public Comment, Item 8.2., July 14 City Council Meeting Dear City of Calistoga Council Members,
I am writing to express my support of adding Class II bike lanes to Washington Street from Berry to North Oak with its repaving. Bike lanes will make it safer and more comfortable for students, families, and beginner riders to bike to important community spaces like schools, Logvy Park and the Community Pool, and the Boys and Girls Club. When more people are able to bike, we improve our community's health, increase access to opportunities for people who do not drive, and encourage people to shift from car trips to bike trips, reducing traffic congestion and air pollution.

Thank you for your consideration,
Gerardo Capiel
Gerardo
Capiel

Item #8.2.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Ryan Melendez
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2026 3:49 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Washington Street Public Comment, Item 8.2., July 14 City Council Meeting Dear City of Calistoga Council Members,
I am writing to express my support of adding Class II bike lanes to Washington Street from Berry to North Oak with its repaving.

I am an avid cyclist throughout Napa County and the San Francisco Bay Area. Riding in rural communities presents several challenges for cyclists, but bike lanes in cities and high-traffic areas make it safer and more comfortable for students, families, and beginner riders to bike to important community spaces like schools, parks, stores and markets, workplaces, and events.. When more people are able to bike, we improve our community's health, increase access to opportunities for people who do not drive, and encourage people to shift from car trips to bike trips, reducing traffic congestion and air pollution.

Furthermore, bike lanes have actually been shown to increase economic activity for small businesses.

For example: a 2023 study - Protected Bike Lanes Mean Business, by PeopleForBikes and the Alliance for Biking and Walking - cited a survey showing that adding bike lanes on Valencia Street in San Francisco improved sales for 66% of the shops on the street and hurt sales for only 4%. Yet, a city plan to upgrade the bikeways to protected bike lanes faced numerous hurdles, including business owners’ objections. More shop owners are coming to understand the value of customers who shop by bike. The study quotes the owners of Green Apple Books in San Francisco and Alamo Drafthouse in Austin, among others, who recognize that they can get more customers to their businesses through active transportation.

Lastly, I have been the victim of two accidents involving motor vehicles while riding my bike. Thankfully, neither accident was severe and only resulted in minor injuries, but the experiences have stuck with me through my years of cycling and I'm hyper aware of the dangers that come with riding on busy roads with distracted, intoxicated, or otherwise irresponsible drivers.

I write to you in strong support of adding bike lanes to the upcoming Washington Street repaving project to help make Calistoga a safer, healthier, more prosperous place to live, work, shop, and bike.

Thank you for your consideration,
Ryan C. Melendez
Cyclist, Calistoga visitor and patron.

Item #8.2.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Cathy Osgood
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2026 3:30 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Washington Street Public Comment, Item 8.2., July 14 City Council Meeting Dear City of Calistoga Council Members,
I am writing to express my support of adding Class II bike lanes to Washington Street from Berry to North Oak with its repaving.

Bike lanes will make it safer and more comfortable for students, families, and beginner riders to bike to important community spaces like schools, Logvy Park and the Community Pool, and the Boys and Girls Club. When more people are able to bike, we improve our community's health, increase access to opportunities for people who do not drive, and encourage people to shift from car trips to bike trips, reducing traffic congestion and air pollution.

Thank you for your consideration,
Cathy Osgood
Avid cyclist—we bike up to Calistoga from Napa and would love to see a safe way to ride through downtown Calistoga—which we LOVE!!
THANK YOU!!
Item #8.2.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: David W
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2026 3:20 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Washington Street Public Comment, Item 8.2., July 14 City Council Meeting Dear City of Calistoga Council Members,
I am writing to express my support of adding Class II bike lanes to Washington Street from Berry to North Oak with its repaving.

Bike lanes will make it safer and more comfortable for students, families, and beginner riders to bike to important community spaces like schools, Logvy Park and the Community Pool, and the Boys and Girls Club. When more people are able to bike, we improve our community's health, increase access to opportunities for people who do not drive, and encourage people to shift from car trips to bike trips, reducing traffic congestion and air pollution.

Thank you for your consideration,
David White
Item #8.2.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: DORA L. VEGA
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2026 3:14 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Washington Street Public Comment, Item 8.2., July 14 City Council Meeting Dear City of Calistoga Council Members, I am writing to express my support of adding Class II bike lanes to Washington Street from Berry to North Oak with its repaving. Bike lanes will make it safer and more comfortable for students, families, and beginner riders to bike to important community spaces like schools, Logvy Park and the Community Pool, and the Boys and Girls Club. When more people are able to bike, we improve our community's health, increase access to opportunities for people who do not drive, and encourage people to shift from car trips to bike trips, reducing traffic congestion and air pollution. Thank you for your consideration, [First & Last Name] [Address, City, Neighborhood of Residence, or connection to Calistoga]
Item #8.2.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Vanessa Hauswald
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2026 3:09 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Washington Street Public Comment, Item 8.2., July 14 City Council Meeting Dear City of Calistoga Council Members,
I am writing to express my support of adding Class II bike lanes to Washington Street from Berry to North Oak with its repaving.

Bike lanes will make it safer and more comfortable for students, families, and beginner riders to bike to important community spaces like schools, Logvy Park and the Community Pool, and the Boys and Girls Club. When more people are able to bike, we improve our community's health, increase access to opportunities for people who do not drive, and encourage people to shift from car trips to bike trips, reducing traffic congestion and air pollution.

Thank you for your consideration,
Vanessa Hauswald
Petaluma resident, but I spend a ton of time in Calistoga Item #8.2.

Yudiana Galvan
From: Anthony McGloin
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2026 3:53 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Public Comment Item 8.2
Hello Mayor and Councilmembers,
Please add bike lanes now, even if it means removing parking.

Our public streets exist first to move people safely—not to store vehicles. Parking is important, but it should never take priority over a child’s safety.

Calistoga has already experienced the unthinkable. A 10-year-old boy, Gregorio “Junior” Marin Jr., lost his life while riding his bike on Washington Street. We cannot change what happened then, but we can make better the road he died on.

This generation of children deserves better. They deserve a safe way to ride to school, parks, and friends’ homes without their families fearing for their lives.

Please make the difficult but necessary decision. Remove the parking where needed and build the bike lanes now.

Thank you,
Anthony McGloin
Item #8.2.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: John Gleazer
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 1:33 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Washington Street Public Comment, Item 8.2., July 14 City Council Meeting Attachments: ATAC-Meeting-2019.pdf
Dear City of Calistoga Council Members,
I am writing to express my support of adding Class II bike lanes to Washington Street from Berry to North Oak with its repaving.

Bike lanes will make it safer and more comfortable for students, families, and beginner riders to bike to important community spaces like schools, Logvy Park and the Community Pool, and the Boys and Girls Club. When more people are able to bike, we improve our community's health, increase access to opportunities for people who do not drive, and encourage people to shift from car trips to bike trips, reducing traffic congestion and air pollution.

I ride my bicycle frequently from Berry to North Oak in both directions and I am constantly trying to avoid the cracks in the pavement while being mindful of cars coming up the road towards me, and also cars/trucks behind me who have no room at times to pass me, or may take unsafe maneuvers to go around me. The street is too narrow!! Yes, it needs to be widened and, unfortunately, some trees/bushes/parking may need to be removed. Yes, I understand it can be an expensive project, but the future requires it, particularly with the many North Oak activities and the rejuvenation of the fairgrounds.

Bicycle riders come in all ages and should not be subjected to unsafe road roads within town.

When I was on the ATAC committee in 2019 we discussed the details or widening Washington Street with a city engineer when the city was contemplating just such a plan (see attachment)! Why do years need to go by Item #8.2.

with no serious action to resolve this problem? Please respect the efforts of ATAC and desires of community cyclists and dig in and get this done.

Thank you for your consideration,
John Gleazer
long time resident
between Cedar and Myrtle streets) Calistoga
Item #8.2.

Item #8.2.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: John Gleazer
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 2:54 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Grant Street Road Projects
Dear Council Members:

With regard to the Grant Street collector-street pavement project (Garnett Creek Court to the City Limits near Myrtledale Road), an extension should be considered for a new separate multi-use pathway.

I would like to suggest that a corridor parallel to Grant Street within and along the Fairgrounds property could provide the room needed for the multi-use pathway and other infrastructure elements where the most significant issues exist. The option will resolve the risks to walkers/cyclists who must navigate the narrow street, the inadequate width of the “bike lane” and the traffic hazards to all who walk/ride the “Loop”. In addition it will benefit future residents who will soon populate the major developments on the north side of Grant Street This is an important improvement for the future. It could provide an off-street paved right-of-way designated path exclusively for bicycles and pedestrians safely separated from the narrow and busy Grant Street from North Oak to Centennial circle area, a significant and necessary extension of the proposed project. This “Class I” type route is the safest option for all walker/cyclists, leading to North Oak and all the activities located on North Oak and nearby schools.

Thank you for your consideration of this improvement, and similar improvements to Washington Street.

John Gleazer
Calistoga
Item #8.2.

City of Calistoga

STAFF REPORT
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Rachel Stepp, Deputy City Manager
Meeting: City Council - Regular Meeting - Jul 14 2026
Subject: Modular Office Project Direction
DESCRIPTION:

Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a $358,317.74 purchase order with Mobile Modular for a modular office building behind City Hall, and directing staff to return with quotes for associated utility and site work.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a purchase order with Mobile Modular in the amount of $358,317.74 using the competitively bid Sourcewell ezIQC® process and directing staff to return at the next regular City Council meeting with quotes for the associated utility infrastructure and site preparation work for Council consideration and award.

Alternatively, the City Council may provide direction to:

1. Direct staff to return at the next regular City Council meeting with the full modular office project for Council consideration, including both the Mobile Modular purchase order and the associated utility infrastructure and site preparation work; or

2. Take no further action on the modular office project at this time.

SUMMARY:

At a previous meeting, the City Council considered several options to address the City’s office space constraints, particularly the need to provide adequate workspace for the Planning and Building Department while maintaining close coordination with City Hall operations.

Following Council discussion, staff was directed to proceed with the modular office option to be located behind City Hall. This option provides a dedicated workspace for the Planning and Building Department while keeping the department close to other City offices and services.

Since that direction was provided, staff has continued to refine the scope, available funding, and anticipated cost of the modular office project. The project includes the purchase and installation of the modular building, along with the associated site preparation, utility infrastructure, IT work, and furniture necessary to make the space operational.

ANALYSIS:

Following Council’s prior direction to proceed with the modular office option behind City Hall, staff have continued refining the project scope, available funding, and anticipated implementation costs.

Item #8.3.

Funding is available to support the modular office project. The City has identified $409,978.33 in available funding from the Impact Admin Fund, along with $225,299 in CIRA grant funding, for a total of $635,277.33. This funding is expected to be sufficient to cover the major components of the project, including the purchase of the modular building, utility infrastructure work, IT work, and furniture needs.

The current anticipated project components include the following:
• Modular building purchase
• Utility infrastructure and site preparation work necessary to prepare the location behind City Hall and connect the modular building to City utilities
• IT and communications work necessary to support City operations in the modular building • Furniture and workspace needs, with some existing furniture from City Hall expected to be reused The modular building purchase through Mobile Modular is $358,317.74. Based on one bid received to date, the utility infrastructure work is estimated at approximately $100,000. Staff recommends including a 15 percent contingency for this portion of the work, bringing the estimated utility infrastructure amount to approximately $115,000. IT work is currently estimated at approximately $10,000. Furniture needs are estimated at $20,000, with the understanding that some existing furniture from City Hall may be reused to reduce overall project costs.

Based on these estimates, the available funding of $635,277.33 is expected to be sufficient to complete the modular office project, including the modular purchase, infrastructure work, IT work, furniture needs, and appropriate contingency. The estimated project components total approximately $503,317.74, leaving approximately $131,959.59 in available funding for any additional project-related costs, final utility work, permitting, inspections, or unforeseen conditions.

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a purchase order with Mobile Modular in the amount of $358,317.74 using the competitively bid Sourcewell ezIQC® process and directing staff to return at the next regular City Council meeting with quotes for the associated utility infrastructure and site preparation work for Council consideration and award.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Funding is available for the modular office project in the total amount of $635,277.33.

Finance has established a project account under 101-4119-5000-50002 for the full project expense.

The project will be funded through a combination of Development Impact Fee funding and CIRA grant funding, as follows:
• $409,978.33 from Development Impact Fee funding
• $225,299 from CIRA grant funding
The Development Impact Fee funding will be transferred into the project account through 101-4119- 3299-50002, with the corresponding transfer out from 148-4700-4799. The CIRA grant funding will be recorded as reimbursement revenue through 101-4119-3289-50002.

CEQA STATUS:

Not Applicable
Item #8.3.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Modular Resolution 2026
City of Calistoga New Mobile Mod 24x50 with Fire Sprinklers Rev Quote Agreement Sale Q-606026 APPROVAL(S):

Connie Cardenas, Admin. Services Director Approved - Jul 02 2026 Mitch Celaya, City Manager Approved - Jul 05 2026
Yudiana Galvan, City of Calistoga | City Clerk Approved - Jul 07 2026 Item #8.3.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

ADOPTED XXXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PURCHASE ORDER WITH

MOBILE MODULAR FOR THE PURCHASE OF A MODULAR OFFICE BUILDING TO

BE LOCATED BEHIND CITY HALL AND DIRECTING STAFF TO RETURN WITH

QUOTES FOR ASSOCIATED UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE AND SITE PREPARATION WORK
WHEREAS, City Hall has limited workspace, meeting space, plan review areas, and customer-facing space, which impacts operations, coordination, and customer service; and
WHEREAS, the City Council previously considered options to address the City’s office space constraints and directed staff to proceed with the modular office option to be located behind City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the modular office building would provide dedicated workspace for the Planning and Building Department while maintaining close proximity to City Hall and other City offices and services; and
WHEREAS, the City has identified $409,978.33 in available funding from the Impact Admin Fund and $225,299 in CIRA grant funding, for a total of $635,277.33 available to support the modular office project; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to purchase the modular office building from Mobile Modular in the amount of $358,317.74 using the competitively bid Sourcewell ezIQC® process and return at the next regular City Council meeting with quotes for the associated utility infrastructure and site preparation work.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Calistoga hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a purchase order with Mobile Modular in the amount of $358,317.74 using the competitively bid Sourcewell ezIQC® process for the purchase of a modular office building to be located behind City Hall.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all terms, conditions, and covenants of said Agreement be, and the same are, hereby approved, ratified, and confirmed.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of July 2026. I,

YUDIANA GALVAN, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA, HEREBY CERTIFY the foregoing resolution was introduced and passed at a regular meeting of the Calistoga City Council by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
_________________________ ___________________________
Yudiana Galvan, City Clerk Donald Williams, Mayor
Item #8.3.

Quote # Q-606026 Page 1 of 8
5/6/2026 3:02:16 PM
a Division of McGrath RentCorp
Corporate Headquarters
5700 Las Positas Rd
Livermore, CA 94551
925-606-9000
www.mgrc.com
Sale Quotation and Agreement
Quote # Q-606026
Date of Quote
Quote Expiration Date:

Estimate Del Date 04/22/2026
Buyer PO#:

Buyer Name and Billing Address Site Information Seller Name City of Calistoga (“Buyer”)
,
Rachel Stepp
Phone #: (707) 942-2844
Rachel Stepp
1232 Washington Street
Calistoga, CA 94515
Cell: (707) 942-2844
Mobile Modular Management Corporation
a Division of McGrath RentCorp ("Seller")
Questions?
Contact: Donald Shoop
[email protected]
Direct Phone: 1 (817) 663-8527
Equipment and Accessories Qty Purchase Price Extended Purchase Price Taxable Office, 24x50 HCD (NonStd) (Non-Standard
Configuration.Size excludes 3' towbar.) 1 $226,270.00 Y Ramp, Custom Plan 1 $32,972.00 $32,972.00 Y
Charges Upon Delivery Qty Charge Each Total One Time Taxable Office, 24x50 HCD (NonStd) (Non-Standard
Configuration.Size excludes 3' towbar.)
Modification (New piers & pads from
outside vendor) 68 $50.00 $3,400.00 Y
Delivery 2 $9,700.00 $19,400.00 N
Block and Level Building 1 $5,461.00 $5,461.00 N
Foundation, Installation 18 $150.00 $2,700.00 Y
Drawings 1 $950.00 $950.00 N
Essential Material Handling Fee 2 $75.00 $150.00 N
Fee, License or Registration for Sale 1 $224.10 $224.10 N Removal, Towbar/Hitch 2 $156.00 $312.00 N
Service, Trip Charge(Del/Blvl) 1 $745.00 $745.00 N
Skirting, Install 148 $19.00 $2,812.00 Y
Installation, Ramp Custom Plan 1 $8,918.00 $8,918.00 N
Service, Carpet Install, Carpet Tile 130 $37.00 $4,810.00 N Service, Cove Base, Install, 4" 400 $4.75 $1,900.00 N
Installation, Sprinklers and Risers 1 $26,680.00 $26,680.00 N Total Estimated Charges
Subtotal $337,704.10
Taxes $20,613.64
Total Charges (including tax) $358,317.74
Special Notes
Block/Level: Price assumes building is installed using Mobile Modular standard foundation. Mobile Modular assumes installation on the minimum foundation design criteria/tolerances. Additional material and labor charges apply for installing buildings above minimum foundation design criteria, raising buildings to meet specific finish floor elevations,raising building level to adjacent buildings, landings, walkways, transitions, etc.

Item #8.3.

Quote # Q-606026 Page 2 of 8
5/6/2026 3:02:16 PM
a Division of McGrath RentCorp
Corporate Headquarters
5700 Las Positas Rd
Livermore, CA 94551
925-606-9000
www.mgrc.com
Sale Quotation and Agreement
Quote # Q-606026
Date of Quote
Quote Expiration Date:

Estimate Del Date 04/22/2026
Buyer PO#:

Tie-downs: Quantity and price may vary based on seismic source factor and site conditions. Patch and repair of site after removal is not included and is the responsibility of the Customer. Wet-stamped foundation drawings are available for an additional charge.

General: Customer's site must be dry, compacted, level (NO MORE THAN 4” OUT OF LEVEL IN ANY DIRECTION ON THE PAD WHERE THE BUILDING IS TO BE INSTALLED) and accessible by normal truck delivery. Pricing does not include any clearing or grading of sites, obstruction removal, site or final building clean up , any asphalt transitions, dolly, crane, forklift, electrical or plumbing connections, window coverings, furniture, casework, appliances, doorstops, phone or data lines, gutters, downspouts or tie-in, temporary power, temporary fencing, traffic control, flagmen, soil and/or pull test, custom engineering, fees associated with inspections, city or county submittals and/or use permits, security screens, door bars and any item not specifically listed as being included.

Yes - Prevailing Wage: Pricing includes prevailing wage and certified payroll for installation work performed on site.

Product availability and delivery date are subject to product availability upon receipt of signed Agreement and/or credit approval.

Skirting: MOBILE MODULAR HAS INCLUDED STANDARD NON-STRUCTURAL SKIRTING IN THIS PROPOSAL.

New buildings come with a one year warranty beginning on the day the modular manufacturer is done with the building at their plant in Phoenix, AZ.

Buildings containing a restroom(s): Restrooms are not self-contained. Water & sewer stub-out locations may vary. Paper & soap dispensers, sanitary and trash receptacles are not provided. Single point connection for the sewer line is NOT provided. Whoever is hooking up the plumbing will have to provide all labor and material to "manifold" multiple drops under the modular building. There will be one drop under the building for each plumbing fixture inside the building, one for each toilet, lav, sink, etc. There will NOT be a single point connection under this building.

Ramps: MOBILE MODULAR HAS INCLUDED A NEW SWITCHBACK HANDICAP RAMP WITH ONE SET OF NEW STEPS ATTACHED.

Site Installation Requirements: Prior to delivery, Customer shall mark the four corners where the building is to be placed on the site/pad location and shall also mark the locations of door(s) and ramp(s). Should special handling be required to position, install, or remove the classroom on Customer's site due to site conditions/constraints and/or obstructions, Customer will be responsible for additional charges. Additional rolling charges may be applicable as site conditions necessitate.

Clarifications
• The Total Price quoted in this Agreement shall be valid through the Quote Expiration Date set forth herein or for 30 days from the Date of Quote, whichever is earlier. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event this Agreement is signed by Buyer after the applicable expiration date, Seller shall have the option to either accept as set forth below or reject the Agreement in writing.

Seller may accept the Agreement by: (1) signing the Agreement below; (2) notifying Buyer in writing of Seller's acceptance; or (3) beginning performance of the Services set forth herein. • This transaction is subject to prior approval of Buyer’s credit to the sole satisfaction of Seller. • Buyer is responsible for proper preparation of the Site prior to delivery of the Equipment in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
• In-fleet used Equipment is subject to availability at the time of Buyer’s signing of this Agreement. • Unless otherwise noted, all Equipment is previously leased and in used condition. Any floor plans attached or provided are conceptual only. Materials, dimensions, and specifications might vary. Detailed specifications may be available upon request.
• A down payment may be required at the time of Buyer’s execution of this Agreement, as specified in the Payment section of the Sale Terms and Conditions, or as may otherwise be specified in this Agreement. • Sales and any other taxes will be calculated based on the applicable rates at the time of invoicing and the Total Price will be adjusted accordingly.
• Unless otherwise noted, prices do not include prevailing wages, Davis-Bacon Act wages or benefits, or other special or certified wages or benefits.

Item #8.3.

Quote # Q-606026 Page 3 of 8
5/6/2026 3:02:16 PM
a Division of McGrath RentCorp
Corporate Headquarters
5700 Las Positas Rd
Livermore, CA 94551
925-606-9000
www.mgrc.com
Sale Quotation and Agreement
Quote # Q-606026
Date of Quote
Quote Expiration Date:

Estimate Del Date 04/22/2026
Buyer PO#:

Item #8.3.

Quote # Q-606026 Page 4 of 8
5/6/2026 3:02:16 PM
a Division of McGrath RentCorp
Corporate Headquarters
5700 Las Positas Rd
Livermore, CA 94551
925-606-9000
www.mgrc.com
Sale Quotation and Agreement
Quote # Q-606026
Date of Quote
Quote Expiration Date:

Estimate Del Date 04/22/2026
Buyer PO#:

This Sale Quotation and Agreement is entered into by and between Seller and Buyer effective as of the date signed by Buyer.

This Sale Quotation and Agreement includes the terms and conditions set forth in the following two documents (collectively, the “Agreement”), each of which is incorporated herein by this reference, and together shall collectively be one integrated contract:

1. Sale Terms and Conditions attached hereto; and

2. Supplemental Sale Terms and Conditions located at https://www.mobilemodular.com/contractterms as the same may be updated from time to time in the sole and absolute discretion of Lessor.

By signing below, Seller: (1) acknowledges and agrees that it has received, read and understands the terms of this Agreement and agrees to be bound by the terms of this Agreement, including prices and specifications, and (2) instructs Seller to make appropriate arrangements for the preparation and delivery of the Equipment identified herein. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts (including through the use of electronic signatures), each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same Agreement. Upon execution of this Agreement, Seller shall generate a Sale Agreement Number, which shall be referenced on all Seller invoices.

No document provided by Buyer including, without limitation, Buyer’s purchase orders, work orders, bills of lading, or forms for receipt or acknowledgment or authorization (“Buyer Forms”), nor the terms and conditions associated with such Buyer Forms, shall amend, modify, supplement, waive, or release any term or condition of this Agreement even if such Buyer Forms are signed by an agent or representative of Seller. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail over any Buyer Forms, and any inconsistent or additional terms and conditions in Buyer Forms shall be deemed void ab initio and of no force or effect.

The individuals signing this Agreement affirm that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement by and on behalf of the parties hereto.

SELLER: BUYER:

Mobile Modular Management Corporation
a Division of McGrath RentCorp
City of Calistoga
Signature:
/InternalSigner/
Signature:
/CustomerSigner/
Name:
/InternalSignerName/
Name:
/CustomerSignerName/
Title:
/InternalSignerTitle/
Title:
/CustomerSignerTitle/
Date:
/InternalDateSigned/
Date:
/CustomerDateSigned/
Item #8.3.

Quote # Q-606026 Page 5 of 8
5/6/2026 3:02:16 PM
a Division of McGrath RentCorp
Corporate Headquarters
5700 Las Positas Rd
Livermore, CA 94551
925-606-9000
www.mgrc.com
Sale Quotation and Agreement
Quote # Q-606026
Date of Quote
Quote Expiration Date:

Estimate Del Date 04/22/2026
Buyer PO#:

SALE TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. SALE. Seller agrees to sell to Buyer, and Buyer agrees to purchase from Seller, the Equipment. “Equipment” means the modular buildings identified in the Agreement, and any Accessories to be furnished by Seller to Buyer. “Accessories” means any additions, attachments, add-ons, fitments, parts, components, or accessories to the modular buildings to be furnished by Seller to Buyer as may be specified in under this Agreement. In connection with its sale of the Equipment and Accessories, Seller shall also perform the services described in the Charges Upon Delivery and/or as clarified in the Special Notes portion of this Agreement, if applicable (the “Services”). This Agreement is not a construction contract or a contract for improvements to real estate or for the design, planning, construction, alteration, repair or maintenance of a building, structure or appurtenance. Seller is not a designer or a manufacturer of the Equipment.

2. PAYMENT. Buyer shall pay Seller the Total Price set forth in the Agreement, which shall include all amounts owed for the Equipment, Accessories, and Services and which shall be subject to adjustments for changes, unknown conditions or unforeseen circumstances, including, but not limited to, driver waiting time, special transport permits, difficult site conditions, or increases in fuel prices, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and subject to adjustments for all applicable taxes calculated at the time of invoicing (collectively, the “Purchase Price”) on the applicable payment schedule listed below. Notwithstanding the possible payment schedules listed below, in the event that an alternate payment schedule is specified in the Special Notes of this Agreement, such alternate payment schedule shall supersede the payment schedules listed below. Any amounts not specified in the applicable payment schedule that hereafter become due from Buyer to Seller pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be due thirty (30) days after Buyer’s receipt of Seller’s invoice, unless a different payment period is provided herein. No payments due from Buyer shall be reduced by any abatement, setoff, or back charge of any kind whatsoever arising from any cause whatsoever. Neither title nor ownership of the Equipment shall pass to Buyer before the entire Purchase Price has been paid to Seller. Buyer hereby grants to Seller, to secure the payment and performance in full of all of Buyer’s obligations under this Agreement, a security interest in the Equipment consistent with the provisions of Section 18 of the Supplemental Sale Terms and Conditions. (a) NEW EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES PAYMENT SCHEDULE.
• Fifty percent (50%) of the Total Price upon Buyer’s execution of this Agreement. • Forty percent (40%) of the Total Price no less than three (3) business days prior to the scheduled delivery of the Equipment to the Site.
• Ten percent (10%) of the Total Price Net 30 days from the date of substantial completion of Seller’s scope of work (substantial completion does not include punch list items).
(b) USED EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES PAYMENT SCHEDULE.
• Twenty-five percent (25%) of the Total Price upon Buyer’s execution of this Agreement. • Sixty-five percent (65%) of the Total Price no less than three (3) business days prior to the scheduled delivery of the Equipment to the Site.
• Ten percent (10%) of the Total Price Net 30 days from the date of substantial completion of Seller’s scope of work (substantial completion does not include punch list items).

3. SELLER SCOPE OF WORK; EXCLUSIONS; CHANGE ORDER. Seller’s scope of work is limited to (1) the procurement and/or preparation of the Equipment and Accessories (if any) to meet the specifications set forth in this Agreement; and (2) performance of the Services. The Total Price excludes all additional services, accessories, ancillary items or equipment and additional on-site labor.

The following are obligations of the Buyer and specifically excluded from Seller’s obligations under this Agreement: (i) permits and licensing related to the Site; (ii) Site engineering or other design services; (iii) selection or preparation of the Site (iv) utilities or temporary power, and (viii) utility connections, whether temporary or permanent. Buyer may request changes or alterations in Seller’s scope of work, which Seller may or may not agree to in Seller’s sole discretion. Any written change orders shall be incorporated by reference into this Agreement and subject to all Terms and Conditions set forth herein.

4. SCHEDULE; BUYER DELAYS.
(a) Buyer will schedule operations such that delivery and installation of the Equipment may be carried out by Seller in one continuous operation and in proper sequence. Should there be delays in the Buyer’s preparation of the Site which would delay delivery and/or installation of the Equipment, Buyer shall notify Seller no less than ten (10) days in advance of the Estimated Delivery Date. In the event Buyer fails to comply with the foregoing requirements, Buyer will reimburse Seller for actual costs and damages incurred, including a reasonable markup for overhead and profit for work performed by Seller, resulting from such delay. Any such delay resulting therefrom will extend Seller’s period of performance, which may not be a day for day extension of time. (b) If Buyer delays delivery of the Equipment for any reason for thirty (30) days or longer from the original Estimated Delivery Date, Seller, in its sole discretion may take one or more of the following actions which Buyer shall be notified of in writing: (1) revise Item #8.3.

Quote # Q-606026 Page 6 of 8
5/6/2026 3:02:16 PM
a Division of McGrath RentCorp
Corporate Headquarters
5700 Las Positas Rd
Livermore, CA 94551
925-606-9000
www.mgrc.com
Sale Quotation and Agreement
Quote # Q-606026
Date of Quote
Quote Expiration Date:

Estimate Del Date 04/22/2026
Buyer PO#:
prices to reflect current market rates for materials, equipment or services, which Seller shall notify Buyer of in a written change order prior to delivery of the Equipment; (2) require Buyer to pay any remaining balance of the Purchase Price in full; (3) require Buyer to pay a monthly fee for storage of the Equipment; and (4) terminate the Agreement and in so doing, Buyer shall be responsible for payment to Seller of a termination fee (“Termination Fee”) for the costs incurred and profits lost as a result of Seller’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement prior to such termination, and which must be paid to Seller within ten (10) business days of receipt of written notice from Seller. Any partial payments previously made to Seller will be credited against the Termination Fee and amounts in excess of the Termination Fee may be refunded to Buyer. In the event that Buyer fails to timely pay the Termination Fee, Seller shall have the right to collect the full Purchase Price plus all additional costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred due to Buyer’s failure to timely take delivery of the Equipment and/or to pay such Termination Fee.

5. CANCELLATION. It is understood and agreed between the parties that, upon the Buyer’s execution of this Agreement and acceptance of all Buyer obligations set forth herein, Seller shall proceed with procurement of any materials, equipment, labor, or otherwise in the performance of its obligations hereunder and in so doing, may incur extraordinary costs and expenses. All sales are final and nonrefundable upon delivery of the Equipment to the Site. Any requests to cancel this Agreement prior to delivery may or may not be accepted in Seller’s sole discretion and must be agreed upon by Seller in a writing that expressly references this Agreement and provides all the terms and conditions of the cancellation. In the event Seller accepts a cancellation requested by Buyer, the terms of the cancellation will include a payment to Seller for the costs incurred and profits lost as a result of Buyer’s cancellation (a “Cancellation Fee”), which must be paid to Seller within ten (10) business days of receipt of written notice from Seller. Any partial payments to Seller will be credited against the Cancellation Fee and amounts in excess of the Cancellation Fee may be refunded to Buyer. No cancellation, even if accepted by Seller, shall be effective unless and until Buyer timely and fully pays the Cancellation Fee. In the event Seller accepts Buyer’s cancellation but Buyer fails to timely pay the Cancellation Fee, Seller shall have the right to collect the full Purchase Price plus all additional costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred due to Buyer’s failure to complete the cancellation.

6. EQUIPMENT INSPECTION; ACCEPTANCE. Following delivery and installation of the Equipment, Buyer shall inspect the Equipment within forty-eight (48) hours of substantial completion of Seller’s scope of work for such Equipment. Buyer shall immediately notify Seller in writing of any observed defects upon completion of such inspection and should Buyer fail to submit such written documentation within the foregoing timeframe, it shall be conclusively presumed between Buyer and Seller that Buyer has inspected the Equipment and that all Equipment is in conformance with the Agreement and has been accepted by Buyer.

7. RISK OF LOSS. All risk of loss or damage to the Equipment shall transfer to Buyer upon delivery of the Equipment to the Site.

8. INSURANCE. Upon delivery of the Equipment and until Buyer has paid for the Equipment in full, Buyer shall procure and maintain, at its sole expense (including all premiums, deductibles and self-insured retentions), (i) property insurance covering the loss, theft, destruction, or damage to the Equipment in an amount not less than the full replacement value thereof (and with a deductible no higher than $25,000), naming Seller as loss payee of the proceeds, and (ii) commercial general liability insurance (minimum of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate) (and with a deductible no higher than $25,000), naming Seller and its designees as additional insureds. Buyer's insurance shall be primary and non-contributory to any insurance maintained by Seller or any other additional insureds. The liability insurance policy shall contain cross-liability and waiver of subrogation provisions in favor of Seller and any other additional insureds. All evidence of all required insurance shall be in a form reasonably acceptable to Seller and with a company having an A.M. Best rating of A- (VII) or better, and shall not be subject to cancellation without thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to Seller. Buyer shall provide to Seller insurance certificates and endorsements (including without limitation, additional insured and loss payee endorsements) evidencing compliance with the insurance requirements of this Agreement (including without limitation, the deductible amounts and waiver of subrogation) prior to delivery of the Equipment and shall maintain all required insurance coverage until Buyer has paid for the Equipment in full. Seller will not and does not provide insurance for any of Buyer’s personal property that may be in or on any Equipment. Any failure by Seller to obtain or receive certificates of insurance or any endorsements prior to delivering the Equipment to Buyer will not be deemed a waiver of Buyer’s obligations to procure and maintain the insurance specified herein.

Item #8.3.

Quote # Q-606026 Page 7 of 8
5/6/2026 3:02:16 PM
a Division of McGrath RentCorp
Corporate Headquarters
5700 Las Positas Rd
Livermore, CA 94551
925-606-9000
www.mgrc.com
Sale Quotation and Agreement
Quote # Q-606026
Date of Quote
Quote Expiration Date:

Estimate Del Date 04/22/2026
Buyer PO#:

9. INDEMNIFICATION. TO THE FULL EXTENT NOT PROHIBITED BY LAW, BUYER, ON BEHALF OF ITSELF, ITS SUCCESSORS,

ASSIGNS, PARENTS, SUBSIDIARIES, VENDORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, AND AFFILIATES, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE

REPRESENTATIVES, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, MANAGERS, VENDORS, MEMBERS, SHAREHOLDERS, PARTNERS, CONTRACTORS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, AND ASSIGNS (EACH, A “BUYER PARTY,” AND COLLECTIVELY, THE “BUYER PARTIES”) SHALL INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, AND HOLD HARMLESS, SELLER, ITS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, PARENTS,

SUBSIDIARIES, VENDORS AND CONTRACTORS (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TRANSPORTATION AND DELIVERY

VENDORS AND CONTRACTORS), AND AFFILIATES, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE REPRESENTATIVES, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, VENDORS, CONTRACTORS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, AND ASSIGNS (COLLECTIVELY, THE “INDEMNIFIED PARTIES”) FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LOSSES, FEES, COSTS, EXPENSES, CLAIMS, LIABILITIES, DAMAGES, PENALTIES, FINES, FORFEITURES, AND SUITS (INCLUDING COSTS OF DEFENSE, SETTLEMENT AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES,

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES WHETHER INCURRED IN THE ASSESSMENT OR MANAGEMENT OF ANY CLAIM OR AT TRIAL AND ON APPEAL) (COLLECTIVELY, “LOSSES”) RELATING TO OR ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION : (1) ANY BREACH OR NONFULFILLMENT OF ANY COVENANT, AGREEMENT, OR OBLIGATION TO BE PERFORMED BY BUYER UNDER THIS

AGREEMENT, OR ANY INACCURACY IN OR BREACH OF ANY OF THE REPRESENTATIONS OF BUYER SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT; (2) BUYER’S OWNERSHIP AND UTILIZATION OF THE EQUIPMENT; (3) ANY DEATH OR BODILY INJURY TO

ANY PERSON OR DESTRUCTION OR DAMAGE TO ANY PROPERTY TO WHICH THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF A BUYER PARTY CONTRIBUTED; OR (4) ANY NEGLIGENT OR INTENTIONAL ACT OR OMISSION OF ANY BUYER PARTY OR ANY ACTION RELATED TO OR ANY USE OF ANY EQUIPMENT. If the indemnity and defense obligations in this Paragraph are otherwise prohibited by law, Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Indemnified Parties harmless from Losses to the maximum extent permitted by Law. The indemnity and defense obligations of the Buyer under this Paragraph and those elsewhere in this Agreement and any other related agreements (i) shall not be limited by any limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation, or benefits payable under workers compensation acts, disability acts, or other employee benefit acts, (ii) shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement and shall apply to Losses arising before or after the performance of any obligation under this Agreement, (iii) shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce any other rights, including rights of indemnity accorded by Law to the persons or entities indemnified, and (iv) shall not be limited or diminished in any way by insurance coverage.

10. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT NOT PROHIBITED BY LAW, SELLER’S LIABILITY, IF ANY, SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE VALUE OF THE total PRICE, AND SELLER SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY TO BUYER OR ANY THIRD PARTY

FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), STRICT LIABILITY OR OTHERWISE.

11. WARRANTIES.
(a) USED EQUIPMENT. Except as specifically stated in Section 6(b) below, all Equipment is previously leased or used and will exhibit normal wear and tear consistent with other used equipment of similar age or use, including with respect to wall panel surfaces, ceiling tiles, windows, flooring, general appearance, etc. BUYER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT THE EQUIPMENT IS SOLD “AS IS, WHERE IS, AND WITH ALL FAULTS.” SELLER MAKES NO WARRANTY, GUARANTY, OR REPRESENTATION

WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ORAL OR WRITTEN, WITH RESPECT TO THE ADEQUACY OF THE SITE OR FITNESS

OF UTILITIES AT THE SITE OR THE DURABILITY, CONDITION, QUALITY, DESIGN, CAPACITY, SUITABILITY, OR PERFORMANCE OF THE EQUIPMENT; AND SELLER EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS, WHETHER ARISING BY LAW, COURSE OF

DEALING, COURSE OF PERFORMANCE, USAGE OF TRADE OR OTHERWISE, ANY (A) WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, (B) WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND (C) WARRANTY AGAINST INFRINGEMENT OF ANY PATENT, COPYRIGHT, TRADEMARK, TRADE SECRET OR OTHER PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF A THIRD PARTY. BUYER

ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT IT HAS SELECTED AND INSPECTED ALL EQUIPMENT PRIOR TO MAKING FULL

PAYMENT OF THE TOTAL PRICE OR BEFORE ACCEPTING DELIVERY AND RISK OF LOSS, AND THAT BUYER IS SATISFIED AS TO THE EQUIPMENT’S CONDITION.
(b) NEW EQUIPMENT. Notwithstanding any disclaimer of warranties elsewhere in the Agreement, if the Equipment purchased under this Agreement is sold as new equipment and identified as such in the Agreement, Seller warrants in accordance with this Paragraph for twelve (12) months from the date of manufacture that the Equipment shall be new upon delivery and free from major defects in materials and workmanship that prevent its normal use and operation under normal use and regular service and maintenance by Buyer. New Accessories shall carry the warranty of the manufacturer, which Seller shall assign to Buyer to the extent transferable.

Provided Buyer provides written notice to Seller of any failure or defect in the Equipment within two (2) days after its discovery and within the applicable warranty period, Seller shall replace the Equipment or repair the defect. Failure to provide timely notice shall result in a limitation or voidance of this warranty. If Buyer does not grant access for repairs during normal working hours, which are 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, Buyer shall bear the cost of any overtime labor. This warranty does not extend to any Equipment that has been subjected to improper use, damaged by accident or abuse, or repaired or altered by Buyer without prior written authorization from Seller. THIS EXPRESS WARRANTY FOR NEW EQUIPMENT IS SELLER’S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE

WARRANTY AND RECOURSE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT FOR NEW EQUIPMENT, AND IT IS LIEU OF, AND SELLER

EXCLUDES AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS, ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, GUARANTEES, AND REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY

KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ORAL OR WRITTEN, WHETHER ARISING BY LAW, COURSE OF DEALING, COURSE OF

PERFORMANCE, USAGE OF TRADE OR OTHERWISE, ANY (A) WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, (B) WARRANTY OF

FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND (C) WARRANTY AGAINST INFRINGEMENT OF ANY PATENT, COPYRIGHT, TRADEMARK, TRADE SECRET OR OTHER PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF A THIRD PARTY.

Item #8.3.

Quote # Q-606026 Page 8 of 8
5/6/2026 3:02:16 PM
a Division of McGrath RentCorp
Corporate Headquarters
5700 Las Positas Rd
Livermore, CA 94551
925-606-9000
www.mgrc.com
Sale Quotation and Agreement
Quote # Q-606026
Date of Quote
Quote Expiration Date:

Estimate Del Date 04/22/2026
Buyer PO#:
(c) SERVICES. Seller warrants to Buyer that it shall perform the Services using personnel of required skill, experience, and qualifications and in a professional and workmanlike manner in accordance with generally recognized industry standards for similar services and shall devote adequate resources to meet its obligations under this Agreement. With respect to any Services subject to a claim under the warranty set forth in this Section, Seller shall, in its sole discretion, (i) repair or re-perform the applicable Services or (ii) credit or refund the price of such Services at the pro rata contract rate. The Seller shall not be liable for a breach of the warranties set forth in this Section unless: (i) Buyer gives written notice of the defective or non-conforming Goods or Services, as the case may be, reasonably described, to Seller within three (3) months of Seller’s performance of the Services and within four (4) days of the time when Buyer discovers the defect. This warranty does not extend to any defect caused by accident or abuse, or repaired or altered by Buyer without prior written authorization from Seller. EXCEPT FOR THE SERVICES WARRANTIES SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION, SELLER MAKES NO WARRANTIES WHATSOEVER WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICES. ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS AND IMPLIED, ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED.
(d) MANUFACTURER WARRANTIES. Seller hereby assigns to Buyer any warranties applicable to the Equipment received from a manufacturer to the extent such warranties are still applicable, in force and assignable. Buyer hereby waives, and agrees that it will not assert, any claim of any nature whatsoever against Seller based on any manufacturer warranties. If any manufacturer warranties that remain valid and in force cannot be assigned or made available to Buyer, Seller agrees to use reasonable efforts at Buyer’s cost to enforce such warranties.

12. DEFAULT; REMEDIES OF SELLER. Each of the following shall constitute an "Event of Default": (1) Buyer’s failure to make any required payment to Seller within ten (10) calendar days after its due date, including but not limited to Buyer’s failure to make timely payments in accordance with the payment schedules in Section 2(a) through 2(b) hereof; (2) Buyer’s failure in the performance of any other obligation under this Agreement and the continuance of such default for ten (10) calendar days after written notice thereof by Seller to Buyer; (3) any warranty, representation or statement made or furnished to Seller by or on behalf of Buyer proves to be false in any material respect; (4) any uninsured loss, theft, damage or destruction to, or the attempted sale or encumbrance by Buyer of, the Equipment, or any levy, seizure or attachment thereof or thereon, prior to payment of the Purchase Price in full; (5) Buyer’s insolvency, dissolution, winding up, termination of existence, or cessation or discontinuance of business prior to payment of the Purchase Price in full; (6) the appointment of a receiver of any part of, the assignment for the benefit of creditors by, or the commencement of any proceedings under any bankruptcy, reorganization or arrangement laws by or against, the Buyer prior to payment of the Purchase Price in full. Buyer acknowledges that any Event of Default will substantially impair the value of this Agreement to Seller; or (7) Buyer’s breach of any other agreement between Buyer and Seller, regardless of whether the effective date of such agreement is before or after the Effective Date. Upon the occurrence of any Event of Default and any time thereafter prior to payment of the Purchase Price in full, Seller may exercise one or more of the following remedies: (1) terminate this Agreement; (2) declare all unpaid payments under this Agreement to be immediately due and payable; (3) direct Buyer at its expense to promptly prepare the Equipment for pickup by Seller and take possession of the Equipment wherever found, and for this purpose enter upon any premises of Buyer and remove the Equipment, without any liability to Buyer or requirement for a suit, action, bond or other proceedings; (4) use, hold, sell, lease or otherwise dispose of the Equipment on the Site or any other location without affecting the obligations of Buyer as provided in this Agreement; (6) proceed by appropriate action either in law or in equity to compel Buyer’s performance or to recover damages sufficient to ensure that Seller receives the full benefit of it bargain under this Agreement, plus attorneys’ fees and any other expenses paid or incurred by Seller in connection with repossession, holding, repair and subsequent disposition of the Equipment; (7) apply any deposit or down payment specified in this Agreement to payment of Seller’s costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees incurred in enforcing this Agreement (provided, however, nothing herein shall be construed to mean that Seller’s damages are limited to the amount of such deposit or down payment); and (8) exercise any and all other rights of Seller under applicable law. These rights and remedies are nonexclusive and may be exercised concurrently or separately. Seller’s waiver of any Event of Default shall not constitute a waiver of any other Event of Default or of any other right under this Agreement or applicable law.

Sale Terms and Conditions, Rev01/14/25
Item #8.3.

1 Yudiana Galvan
From: Lana Richardson
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 4:43 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Public comment agenda item 8.3
Mayor Williams
Vice-Mayor Gift
Council members - Cooper, Eisenberg, Lopez-Ortega
Earlier this year when the Planning Building department needed additional space, there was discussion/review of the need for expanding City office space. The modular approach was discussed at that time. Ultimately, relocation and adjustments were made to accommodate the additional staff.

This may not be an optimal long term solution but it appears to be working at this time. The expense and location of a modular unit does not seem warranted or necessary at this time. When there is a comprehensive Master Plan for the fairgrounds property, it should definitely address the potential for expansion and/or relocation of City offices.

Lana Richardson
Calistoga
Item #8.3.