Attachment 2 - Resolution for SEIR 2014-8 — Camarillo City Council, November 8, 2023

Resolution No. 2023-

Page 1 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF CAMARILLO APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN

ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL SUBSEQUENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) 2014-8.

The City Council of the City of Camarillo resolves as follows:

SECTION 1. General Findings. The City Council of the City of Camarillo finds and declares as follows:

A. Dennis Hardgrave of Development Planning Services, representing RIC (Springville), LLC., submitted a General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, and Airport North Specific Plan amendment affecting approximately 26 acres of real property located south of the U.S. 101 Freeway, west of Springville Drive, north of the Camarillo Airport, just east of West Ventura Boulevard (the “Subject Property”).

B. The proposed General Plan amendment ( “GPA 2019 -1”) will change the General Plan Designation of the Subject Property from General Commercial to Industrial (Research and Development); the proposed change of zone (“CZ -335”) will change the zoning from Commercial Planned Development (CPD) to Li mited Manufacturing (LM).; the proposed amendment to the Airport North Specific Plan will change its land use designation for the Subject Property from “Commercial” to “Industrial,” (collectively, the "Project”).

C. Concurrent with the review of this Resolution, the City Council considered the Project.

D. The Planning Commission considered the Project at its October 3, 2023, meeting where the Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council (4- 0).

E. Notice of Public Hearing before the City Council was duly given and published in the time, form, and manner as required by law; and
F. On November 8, 2023, the City Council considered this Resolution. Its findings are made based on the entire administrative record including testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission on October 3, 2023, and to the City Council at its Novem ber 8, 2023, public hearing, including, without limitation, the staff report submitted by the Director of Community Development.

SECTION 2. Environmental Findings. The City reviewed the environmental impacts of the Project under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal.

Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15164(a), an addendum to a previously certified EIR must be prepared if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. The City Council finds as follows:

Resolution No. 2023-

Page 2 of 3 ends

• On June 22, 2011, Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH # 2010081043) was certified for Tentative Tract (TT) No. 5812, which analyzed the development of 525,000 square feet of light industrial uses and 175,000 square feet of office uses, within the Subject Property. • On September 28, 2016, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment, to change the Land Use Element designation from Research and Development (R&D) to General Commercial, a corresponding amendment to the Airport North Specific Plan, a Change of Zone (CZ-322) from LM to Commercial Planned Development (CPD), and a Subsequent Final EIR No. 2014-8 (SEIR SCH #2010081043)
• The City has contracted with Rincon Environmental Consultants to evaluate the environmental impacts of the Project pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines and the City of Camarillo Environmental Guidelines.
• The changes that are being proposed with this Project are minor in the sense and will not create potentially significant environmental impacts above and beyond those with which were contemplated in the Final SEIR 2014-8 for the approved Project.
• This Project will also not substantially increase the magnitude or severity of impacts that were previously identified.
• Accordingly, an Addendum to a previously adopted Final SEIR 2014 -8 (SCH #2010081043) has been prepared and no further environmental review is required.

SECTION 2. Adoption of the Addendum to Final S EIR, 2014-8. After considering the proposed Addendum to Final SEIR, 2014 -08, and the evidence of the entire administrative record, the City Council exercises its independent judgment and finds the Addendum to Final SEIR, 2014 -08 adequately complies with the requirements of the CEQA Guidelines and the City’s Environmental Guidelines; and the Project impacts have been adequately addressed in the Addendum to Final SEIR 2014-8 (SEIR SCH #2010081043) that was prepared for the Project. Based on the above findings, the City Council adopts the Addendum to the Final SEIR 2014 -8 attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference.

SECTION 3. Office of Record . The record of proceedings upon which this decision is based is located in the Department of Community Development, which is the office of record for the matter.

SECTION 4. Construction. This Resolution must be broadly construed to achieve the purposes stated in this Resolution. It is the City Council’s intent that the provisions of this Resolution be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a manner that facilitates the purposes set forth in this Resolution.

SECTION 5. Limitations. The City Council’s analysis and evaluation of the project is based on the best information currently available. It is inevitable that in evaluating a project that absolute and perfect knowledge of all possible aspects of the project will not exist. One of the major limitations of the analysis of the project is the City Council’s lack of knowledge of future events. In all instances, best efforts have been made to form

Resolution No. 2023-

Page 3 of 3 ends

accurate assumptions. Somewhat related to this are limitations on the City’s ability to solve what are in effect regional, state, and National problems and issues. The City must work within the political framework within which it exists and with the limita tions inherent in that framework.

SECTION 6. Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable.

SECTION 7. Execution. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby authorized to affix their signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of Camarillo, and the City Clerk, or duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest thereto.

SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Resolution is effective upon adoption, provided that GPA 2019-1, CZ-335, or the amendment to the Airport North Specific Plan is approved and adopted at the same time as this Resolution.

APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on November 8, 2023.

Susan Santangelo, Mayor
ATTEST:

Kristy Buxkemper, City Clerk

I, Kristy Buxkemper, City Clerk of the City of Camarillo, herby certify that the forgoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City of Camarillo at a regular meeting held on November 8, 2023, by the following vote Council:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

Kristy Buxkemper, City Clerk

Pr
oposed Land Use Reversion Project
Add
endum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report
SC
H#2010081043
p
repared by
City of Camarillo
Department of Community Development
601 Carmen Drive
Camarillo, California 93010
Contact: Paul McClaren, Senior Planner
prepared with the assistance of
Rincon Consultants
180 North Ashwood Avenue
Ventura, California 93303
October 2023

EXHIBIT A

Table of Contents

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

Table of Contents

Acronyms and Abbreviations
................................
................................
................................
.................

iii

1 Introduction

................................
................................
................................
................................
....

1 2

Project Background

................................
................................
................................
.........................

3 2.1

Project Location

................................
................................
................................
..................

3 2.2

Land Use Designation

................................
................................
................................
..........

3 2.3

Zoning Designation

................................
................................
................................
.............

3 2.4

Project

History

................................
................................
................................
....................

3 3

Project Description

................................
................................
................................
.......................

13 3.1

Lead Agency Name and Contact

................................
................................
.......................

13 3.2

Project Sponsor’s Name and Contact

................................
................................
...............

13 3.3

Existing Conditions

................................
................................
................................
............

13 3.4

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

................................
................................
..............

13 4

Impact Analysis

................................
................................
................................
.............................

15 4.1

Aesthetics

................................
................................
................................
..........................

17 4.2

Agriculture and Forestry Resources

................................
................................
..................

21 4.3

Air Quality

................................
................................
................................
.........................

23 4.4

Biological Resources

................................
................................
................................
..........

27 4.5

Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources

................................
............................

31 4.6

Energy

................................
................................
................................
...............................

35 4.7

Geology and Soils

................................
................................
................................
..............

37 4.8

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

................................
................................
...............................

43 4.9

Hazards and Hazardous Materials

................................
................................
....................

45 4.10

Hydrology and Water Quality

................................
................................
...........................

51 4.11

Land Use and Planning

................................
................................
................................
......

55 4.12

Mineral Resources

................................
................................
................................
............

57 4.13

Noise

................................
................................
................................
................................
.

59 4.14

Population and Housing

................................
................................
................................
....

63 4.15

Public Services and Recreation

................................
................................
.........................

65 4.16

Transportation

................................
................................
................................
..................

67 4.17

Utilities and Service Systems

................................
................................
............................

71 4.18

Wildfire
................................
................................
................................
..............................

75 4.19

Mandatory Findings of
Significance

................................
................................
..................

77 5

Conclusion
................................
................................
................................
................................
.....

79 6

References

................................
................................
................................
................................
....

81 City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

Figures

Figure 1

Regional Location

................................
................................
................................
................

6 Figure 2

Project Location

................................
................................
................................
..................

7 Figure 3

Surrounding Land Uses

................................
................................
................................
.......

8 Figure 4

Adopted Tentative Tract T
-
5812

................................
................................
.........................

9 Figure 5

Current Proposed Land Use

................................
................................
..............................

10 Figure 6

Current and Proposed Zoning

................................
................................
...........................

11 Figure 7

Airport North Specific Plan Phases

................................
................................
...................

12 Acronyms and Abbreviations

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

iii

Acronyms and Abbreviations

Assembly Bill

AQMP

Air Quality Management Plan

BMPs

Best
Management Practices

CALGreen

California Green Building Standards

CCR

California Code of Regulations

CEQA

California Environmental Quality Act

CNEL

Community Noise Equivalent Level

CPD

Commercial Planned Development

CLUP

Compatible Land Use Plan

CWTP

Camar
illo Wastewater Treatment Plant

dBA

decibels A

DDD

Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane

DDE

Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene

DDT

Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane

DOC

California Department of Conservation

EIR

Environmental Impact Report

ESA

Environmental
Project
Site

Assessment

GHGs

Greenhouse Gases

GPA

General Plan Amendment

HRZ

Height Restriction Zone

HVAC

Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning

IPD

Industrial Planned Development

MTCO
2 e

Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent

NAHC

Native American
Heritage Commission

OSHA

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

NOI

Notice of Intent

NPDES

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

Senate Bill

SCAQMD

South Coast Air Quality Management District

SWPPP

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan

SWRCB

State Water Resources Control Board

City of Camarillo

Prop
osed Land Use Reversion Project

MMRP

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

SCH

State Clearinghouse

TDM

Transportation Demand
Management

TPZ

Traffic Pattern Zone

TTM

Tentative Tract Map

VCAPCD

Ventura County Air Pollution Control District

VM
T

Vehicle Miles Traveled

Introduction

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

1 1

Introduction

This document is an Addendum to the 20
16 Springville Commercial
Final Subsequent

Environmental
Impact Report (
Adopted September 28, 2016, SCH
#2010081043
), herein referred to
as the

20 16

Final SEIR
,

located in the City of Camarillo, CA. The document has been

prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Qual
ity Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code §21000, et seq., as amended, and implementing
CEQA Guidelines
, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of
Regulations.

Specifically,
a project has been proposed
located in the Airport North Specific Plan
, in
the City
of Camarillo
. The
Project Site

is comprised of four vacant parcels with a total area of 46.88 acres at the southwest quadrant of U
.

S
.

101 and the Springville Drive interchange. The properties are bounded on the west by Ventura Boulevard, on t
he south by the Camarillo Airport, on the north
by U. S. 101, and on the east by Springville Drive.

T
h
is

Addendum evaluates

the potential impacts associated with the land use changes proposed for a 26 -
acres located within a

46.88 -
acre

area of the Springvil
le Commercial Specific Plan. The property
owner is requesting the Termination of an Agreement (2016 -
56) between the property owner and
the City of Camarillo and reversion of the zoning to the Limited Manufacturing (L -
M) Zone that existed
prior to GPA 2014
-

2. The Termination of Agreement process would return the Project Site

to the L
-
M
Zone. A Tentative Tract Map is not included as a part of this request for Termination of Agreement and reversion action by the City of Camarillo
. No actual buildings are propo
sed at this time and the
ﬁnal building sizes and space would be determined through the separate future planning, entitlement, and CEQA process.

The 20
16 Final SEIR

evaluated
a General Plan Amendment (GPA 2014
-
2) from the City of Camarillo
that would change

the land use designation of 26 acres of the

46.88 -
acre

Project Site

from Industrial
(Research and Development) to Commercial. In addition to the General Plan Amendment, the 2016 SEIR evaluated a corresponding amendment to the Airport North Specific Plan

(
Specific Plan)
, a
change of zone for the 26 acres of the
Project Site

from L
-
M (Limited Manufacturing) to CPD

(Commercial Planned Development)
, and a modification to Tentative Tract Map No. T
-
5812 to
subdivide the
Project Site

into six parcels.

In this Addendum this will herein be referred to as the “
Approved Project
.”

The proposed project would
implement the Termination of Agreement and
would r
eturn the
Project Site

to the L
-
M Zoning.

The purpose of this Addendum is to analyze the environmental impacts of the currently proposed Termination of Agreement and
reversion of the land use designation and zoning to
pre
-
GPA

2014
-
2 designations

of L
-
M
, h
erein referred to as the “
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
,” and
described in detail in Section 3,
Project Description
.

This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the relevant provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines

as implemented by the City

of
Camarillo
. According to Section 15164(b) of the
CEQA Guidelines
, an addendum to an EIR is the appropriate environmental document in instances when “only minor technical changes or additions

are necessary or none of the conditions described
in Section 1
5261 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.” Section 15162(a) of the
CEQA Guidelines

states no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for a project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of th e whole record, one or more of the
following:

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

2 1.

Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial in
crease in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or

2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or

3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exerci
se of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:

The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration,

Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR,

Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce

one or more significant effects of the project, but
the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative, or

Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substa
ntially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

The changes that are being proposed with the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

are minor in the
sense th
ey would not
create potentially significant environmental impacts
above and beyond those
with which were contemplated
in the 2016

Final SEIR

for the Approved Project.

The
Proposed Land
Use Reversion Project

would also not substantially increase the magnitu
de or severity of impacts
that were previously identified. This addendum does not require public circulation because it does not provide significant new information that changes the 2016
Final SEIR

for the Approved Project in
a way that deprives the public

of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

or a feasible way to mitigate or
avoid such an effect.

This Addendum includes an overview of the Project analyzed in the 2016

SEIR, a description of the
proposed changes to the Project (
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
), and a discussion of the
environmental consequences of the proposed changes and comparison of all environmental issue areas contained in the City of Camarillo

CEQA Guidelines.

The City of Camarillo shall consider this Addendum
in conjunction
with the 2016 SEIR prior to
making a decision on the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
. The
2016 Springville Commercial

Final SEIR

is av
ailable for review at the City of
Camarillo
web
sit
e
.

Project Background

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

3 2

Project Background

2.1 Project
Location

The
Springville Commercial
Land Use and Zoning Reversion

Project (
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project
) is located on a

46.88 -
acre

undeveloped
Project Site

in the
c
ity of Camarillo in Ventura
County. It is bordered on the

north by U.S. Highway 101, on the south by the Camarillo Hills Drain and Camarillo Airport, on the east

by Springville Drive

and a commercial
-
zoned vacant property
, and
on the west
,

West Ventura

Boulevard

and a mostly built
-
out and occupied manufacturing
-
zoned
property.

The 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

is a portion of the

larger

337
-
acre

Airport

North Specific Plan
(Specific Plan) area.

Figure
1 shows the regional location of the
Project Site

and
Figure
2 shows the
Project Site

within the existing neighborhood context

and

Specific Plan area

and
Figure
3 shows the
surrounding land uses
.

2.2 Land Use Designation

The
Camarillo General Plan land use designations for the
Project Site

are General Commercial and
Industrial (Research and Development).

2.3 Zoning Designation

The
Project Site

is currently zoned CPD (Commercial Planned Development) and L -
M (Limited
Manufacturing)
.

Figure
5 and

Figure
6 show the current land use and zoning of the
Project Site
.

2.4 Project History

Airport North Specific Plan

The
Project Site

is located within the 337
-
acre Airport North Specific Plan (Specific Plan) area.

Development of the
Project Site

is
planned

under

the

Spe
cific Plan, which was

originally

approved
by the Camarillo City Council in 1986
, and most recently amended by the Camarillo City Council in 2016
.

The Specific Plan presents a development program to aid in the understanding of the intensity levels and land
uses allowed there. The Specific Plan proposes to develop the properties into a high quality, corporate image, business park, with unique development patterns, combining research and development type uses, office, corporate, Mixed
-
Use and hotel uses. The
P
roject Site

is designated
as Commercial and Industrial (Research and Development) under the Airport North Specific Plan 2016 update. A draft EIR was prepared for the Specific Plan in September 1985.

The Specific Plan plans for the development of up to 4,4 88,775
Square Feet

(
SF
)
of mixed use, hotel,
office, corporate, commercial support, and research and development uses. The Project Site

was
envisioned
entail all
Phase I
and a small portion of Phase II
of the Specific Plan buildout (
Figur
e
7 ).

To date, all development that has occurred within the Specific Plan area has occurred to the east of the
Project Site

in the area identified as Phase II. This area is developed with the Camarillo Town

Center and Camarillo Town Center II commercial centers. The Camarillo Town Center is developed with approximately 370,000
SF

of commercial uses. The Camarillo Town Center I
I development is
anchored by a Home

Depot retail store. The area between the proposed
Project Site

and the
City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

4 Camarillo Town Center II development was approved for development of up to 499,000 SF

of
commercial uses in 2007.

In 2011

and 2016 modifications were

approved to the site plan. The area
is currently undeveloped

and applications

to develop a Costco warehouse with a gas station on the eastern half of the site have been filed with the City
.

All of these existing and approved
developments are designated f
or Commercial land use under the City of Camarillo General Plan and zoned CPD (Commercial Planned Development).

T
entative
T
ract
M
ap

No. T
-
5812

In June 2011, the City of Camarillo (City) approved Tentative Tract Map No. T -
5812 (TTM No. T
-
5812), which involv
ed a subdivision of the 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

into 25 or fewer lots for the
development of up to 700,000
SF

of light industrial and/or office uses. The lots range in size from

1.00 acre to 4.07 acres. (See

Figure
4 )
. At the time of the adoption of TTM No. T
-
5812, no actual
physical buildings were proposed, and the final building sizes and space were to be determined throughout the planning process, but the total buil
ding size would not exceed 700,000
SF
. TTM No.

T
-
5812 did not include any land use or zoning changes from the original Industrial (Research and Development) designation and L
-
M (Limited Manufacturing) zoning of the
Project Site
.

The potential environmenta
l impacts associated with the TTM No. T
-
5812 project were addressed in
an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which was certified in June 2011.

The 2011 EIR (
SCH
#2010081043
) provided detailed evaluations of impacts associated with land use and planning, ae
sthetics/ visual resources, agricultural resources, hydrology and water quality, traffic and circulation, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and water supply. Other potential impacts were discussed in less detail in the Impacts Found to be Less Than Significant section of the 2011
EIR.

A modification to T
-
5812 was approved in 2016
to

to subdivide the site into six parcels. A
Subsequent EIR (
SCH #2010081043
) was certified in 2016 which addressed the potential
environmental impacts
associated with TTM modification. The TTM was not recorded and the entitlement has since expired.

General Plan Amendment 2014
-
2 In September 2016, after a request from the applicant, the City approved General Plan Amendment (GPA) 2014
-
2, which
amended

the
land use designation from Industrial (Research and Development) to Commercial and changed the zoning designation from L -
M (Limited Manufacturing) zoning to CPD
(Commercial Planned Development) of 26 acres of the 46.88 -
acre
Project Site.

The remaining 20.88

acres of the
Project Site

remained unchanged as Industrial (Research and Development) and zoned L
-
M (Limited Manufacturing). It also included a corresponding amendment to the Airport North Specific Plan designations. Under a maximum development scenario,

up to 268,500
SF

of
commercial space could be developed within the redesignated 26 acres.

Figure
5 and

Figure
6 below
show the current and proposed land use and zoning.

In September 2016, in conjunction with the GPA described above, the City entered into an agreement (Sellek Agreement) with the applicant for commercial land use,

in anticipation of a
regional destination retail use. The agreement included “Project milestones” for submittal of a regional destination retail use. In March 2017, the agreement was amended to extend the “project milestone” date for the developer to pres
ent to the City a destination retailer in five years, which would be through March 3, 2022.

A Subsequent EIR (
SCH #2010081043
) was certified in 2016 which addressed the potential
environmental impacts associated with GPA, Specific Plan Amendment and Zone Change. The 2016
Subsequent EIR analyzed the potential development of up to 268,500 SF

of commercial space and
Project Background

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

5 198,767
SF

of industrial and/or office space (from the 700,000 (
SF
) of industrial/office) and provided
detailed evaluations of impacts associated

with aesthetics/ visual
resources, air

quality,

agricultural
resources, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, traffic and circulation and water supply.

Other potential impacts were discussed in less detail in

the
Impacts Found to be Less Than Significant section of the 2016 Subsequent EIR.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

6 Figure
1 Regional Location

Project Background

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

7 Figure
2 Project Location

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

8 Figure
3 Surrounding Land Uses

Project Background

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

9 Figure
4 Adopted

Tentative Tract T
-
5812

City of Camarillo

P
roposed Land Use Reversion Project

10 Figure
5 Current Proposed Land Use

Project Background

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

11 Figure
6 Current and Proposed Zoning

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

12 Figur
e
7 Airport North Specific Plan Phases

Project Description

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

13 3

Project Description

3.1 Lead

Agency Name and Contact

Paul McClaren
,
Senior Planner

Phone: 805
-
388
-
53 65

e
-
mail:

pmcclaren@city
ofcamarillo.org

City of Camarillo

601 Carmen Drive

Camarillo, California 93010

3.2 Project Sponsor’s Name and Contact

Dennis Hardgrave

Phone: (805) 402
-
1589

e
-
mail:
[email protected]

Development Planning Services, Inc.

434 Park Cottage Place

Camarillo, California 93012

3.3 Existing Conditions

The
Project Site

is vacant and undeveloped. The
Project Site

is relatively flat and slopes gently to the
south at a rate of approximately 0.007 foot in height to one foot of distance. Until the spring of 2008, the
Project Site

was used for the agricultural production of row crops. In 2013 the property owner attempt
ed to grow hay without the use of water and pesticides. However, the crop did not thrive due to a lack of rain and was
fallowed
. The
Project Site

is no longer
actively
cultivat
ed
. The
Project Site

is
also bisected by the relocation of West Ventura Boulevar d and two cut
-
outs are currently provided
for future roadway access into the
Project Site
.

3.4 Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

In November 2021, the
property owner (hereinafter “
applicant
”)

requested a
Termination of
Agreement of the existing Selleck Agree
ment

and amendment as they determined that the
destination retail concept envisioned at the time is no longer viable due to a major shift in the regional and national retail marketplace. The agreement has since expired.

The applicant is requesting to reve
rt the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to
Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M (Limited Manufacturing) to allow for
the development of up to 525,000
SF

(75 percent) of light industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25
percent) of office uses (pre
-

GPA 2014
-
2 designations).

Figure
5 and
Figure
6 above
show the
proposed land use and zoning. No development is proposed.

Because the
Proposed Land Use
Reversion Project

involves the reversion of a zone change and general plan land use and a departure from the project analyzed
in the 201
6 S
EIR, it

w
as determined that CEQA is required.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

14 This page intentionally left blank.

Impact Analysis

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

15 4

Impact Analysis

This Addendum evaluates potential environmental impacts that could result from the Proposed
Land Use Reversion Project
. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

was re
viewed in relation to
the certified 20
16 Final SEIR

and relative to the current baseline environmental conditions. A comparative analysis of the potential impacts associated with the Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

and those of the approved project ana
lyzed in the adopted 20
16 Final SEIR

has been
prepared using Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines as a guide. The CEQA Appendix G checklist is consistent with the format and environmental topics and questions of the checklist used in the 20 16 Final SEIR
, but
also includes recent updates to reflect the most recently adopted checklist provided in Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines.

The checklist considers the full range of environmental issues subject to analysis under CEQA (in rows), and then poses a series of questions (in columns) aimed at identifying the degree to which the issue was analyzed in the
2016
Final SEIR
. The checklist

also includes a column identifying
whether the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

constitutes new information of substantial
importance relative to each environmental issue
.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

16 This page intentionally left blank.

Impact Analysis

Aesthetics

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

17 4.1

Aesthetics

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significa
nt
Impacts?

Do
2016 SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Have a substantial
adverse effect on a scenic
vista that is visible from a
City scenic corridor?

Page
166

N/A

Substantially alter or
damage a
scenic resource
that is visible from a City
scenic corridor?

Page
166

N/A

Conflict with applicable
General Plan policies or
zoning regulations
governing scenic quality?

Pages
166

167

N/A

Create a new source of
substantial light or
glare
which would adversely
affect day or nighttime
views in the area?

Page 166 ends

N/A

Would the project
h
ave a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista that is visible from a City scenic corridor?

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved
Project

and consists of flat, formerly agricultural, undeveloped land. As described in the 2016 Final
SEIR
, views to the north are dominated by the Ventura Freeway, beyond which are the Camarillo Hills which are developed with residential uses.

Short
-
range views looking south across the
Project
Site

towards Camarillo Airport

are not considered scenic vistas. L
ong
-
range views of the Santa
Monica Mountains to the southeast and east are generally available due to their elevation; however the flat topography of the
Project Site

and intervening buildings to the east may prevent these views from some portions of the
Project Site
. Consequently, no other scenic vistas currently exist in the areas around the
Project Site

and therefore the 2016
Final SEIR

found that impacts to scenic vistas
would be less than significant

for the Approved Project
.

The
Proposed Land Use Rev
ersion Project

involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of
light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

18 does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA

review.

The
proposed L
-
M zoning of the
Project Site

would

also

limit future development to less than 35
feet in height without a Conditional Use Permit. Furthermore, under no circumstance, may building heights (including architectural features) exceed es
tablished
navigational

easements outlined in the
Ventura County Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan. Therefore, the Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista that is visible from a City scenic corrido
r and
would result in no new or more severe impacts

to scenic vistas
beyond those identified
in the 2016
Final SEIR
.

Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings

within a state scenic highway?

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

located
on

the same
Project Site

as
the Approved

Project
. As described in the 2016
Final SEIR
, there are no scenic resources, such as native California trees, bodies of water, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings at the Project Site
. Also, the segments
of U.S. Highway 101 in Camarillo are not designated as a state scenic highway. The only valu ed
public view in the area would be of the Santa Monica Mountains to the southeast and east. Since these mountain ranges are substantially at a higher elevation than the Project Site
, views of the
mountains from the city’s two scenic routes would not be ob structed by project buildings at the
Project Site
.

The 2016
Final SEIR

found that impacts to scenic resources would be less than significant

for the Approved Project
.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

involves the reversion of the land use designatio
n of the
entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses
. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use
Reversion Project

woul
d not have a substantial adverse effect on scenic
resources

and
would result
in no new or more severe impacts

to scenic vistas
beyond those identified in the 2016
Final SEIR
.

Would the project

conflict with applicable General Plan policies or zoning re gulations governing
scenic quality
?

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

located at the same
Project Site

as the
Approved
Project

and involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88 -
acre
Project Site

to
Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M (Limited Manufacturing) to allow for
the development of up to 525,000
SF

(75 percent) of light industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25
percent) of office uses. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Proje
ct

does not include any development
or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the Project Site

would be subject to
project level CEQA review. No actual buildings are proposed at this time.

However, the
Project Site

is located within th
e City’s Heritage Zone which requires developments to
have particular design themes, such as Mission, Monterey, Early California, Spanish, and Mediterranean styles or modern interpretations of these styles. Also, the Specific Plan requires buildings to fol
low design standards based upon Mediterranean, Mission, Monterey, and Early California architectural styles.

As
development project
s are proposed, they would be

also be subject
to an architectural review by the City of Camarillo Community Development Depar tment and
Planning Commission. Each future lot development project would be subject to these requirements Impac
t Analysis

Aesthetics

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

19 and therefore, similar to the Approved Project,
the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would not
conflict with applicable General Plan policies or zo
ning regulations governing scenic quality

and
would result in no new

or more severe impacts

beyond those identified in the 2016
Final SEIR
.

Would the
project
create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime

views in the
area
?

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the dev
elopment of up to 525,000
SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Projec
t Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and consists of flat, formerly
agricultural, undeveloped land. Thus,

there is a potential for
future d
evelopment at the
Project Site

would introduce new sources of light and glare
.

Nighttime sources of light would include vehicle headlights, streetlights
, interior and exterior
security building lights, parking lot and other security lighting. These sources of light would be very similar to the existing lighting in the industrial area to the west and the Camarillo Town Center developments to the east. As d
escribed in the 2016
Final SEIR
, Compliance with Camarillo Zoning
Ordinance standards would ensure that there will not be excessive nighttime lighting beyond that necessary for function and safety. Exterior lighting would be located and designed to minimiz e
direct spill beyond the parking lot or service area. In accordance with Title 24 as implemented through City codes and standard conditions of approval, all lighting would be shielded and focused on the project features, and directed away from the adjacen t highway, roadways, and Camarillo
Airport. Blinking, flashing, or unusually high intensity lighting would be prohibited in accordance with Camarillo Zoning Ordinance standards. As such, lighting at the Project Site

would not adversely
affect aircraft flig
hts into or out of Camarillo Airport or vehicular traffic on U.S. Highway 101 or Ventura Boulevard.

Sources of glare that may cause daytime glare include exterior building materials such as glass and highly reflective façade materials and
finishes. Surface paving materials and cars parked in surface lots are also sources of glare. The Community Design Element of the City of Camarillo General Plan recommends that industrial buildings shall be a compliment to the area and shall promote good a
rchitectural design through the use of building proportions, massing, materials, textures, and colors. Also, the design schemes required by the City’s Heritage Zone as well as the Mediterranean/Spanish architectural styles required under the Specific Plan do not involve design
styles with highly reflective materials.

Based on this information, similar to the Approved Project, and because no physical development is
proposed at this time,
the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would not create a new source o
f
substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area

and would
result in no new

or more severe impacts

beyond those identified in the 2016
Final SEIR
.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

20 This page intentionally left blank.

Impact Analysis

Agriculture and Forestry Resources

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

21 4.2

Agriculture and Forestry Res
ources

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
I
mpacts?

Do
2016 SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Convert Prime Farmland,
Unique Farmland,
or
Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as
shown on maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and
Monitoring
Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non
-
agricultural use?

Page
168

N/A

Conflict with existing zoning
for agricultural use or a
Williamson Act contract?

Page
168

N/A

Involve other changes in the
existing
environment which,
due to their location

or
nature, could result in

conversion of

Farmland to
non
-
agricultural use?

Page 1 ends

69 No

N/A

Would the project c
onvert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,
or
Farmland of Statewide
Importance
(Farmland), as shown on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non -
agricultural use?

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the ent
ire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Propos
ed Land Use Reversion Project
does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and consists of flat, formerly
agricultural, undeveloped land.

The
Project Site

is classified as farmland of local importance by the California Department of Conservation (DOC 2018). Although qualit
y soils are present at the
Project Site
, the 2016
Final SEIR

determined that impacts were less than significant

for the Approved Project

because
of the

relatively small size of the
Project Site
, agricultural irrigation water no longer being available at th e
Project Site
, and the
Project Site

being surrounded by urban uses. The same conditions exist at the Project Site

for the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project. Therefore, similar to the Approved
City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

22 Project
, the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would not co
nvert Farmland of Statewide
Importance to non
-
agricultural use and would result in no new

or more severe impacts

beyond
those identified in the 2016
Final SEIR
.

Would the project c
onflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act con
tract?

The
Project Site

is not subject to a Williamson Act Contract (DOC 2018). Additionally ,

the
Project Site

is also currently zoned and designated for non
-
agricultural uses. Therefore, similar to the Approved
Project, the Proposed Land Use Reversion Pr
oject would not conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use or a Willamson Contract and would result in no new

or more severe impacts

beyond
those identified in the 2016
Final SEIR
.

Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could
result in conversion of Farmland to non
-
agricultural use?

The
Project Site

has been planned

for conversion from agriculture to urban

uses since 1986.

Additionally, land uses within the
Project Site

vicinity include commercial retail, residential, and
airport associated uses.

Generally, there
are

limited agricultural activities within the area of the
Project Site
, which
c
ould
result in conversion of Farmland to non
-
agricultural use
.

Therefore, there
would be no unanticipated

actions that could cause other land in the vicinity of the Project Site

to
convert from agriculture to non
-
agriculture uses.

Therefore, similar to the Approved Project, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would
not involve cha
nges that could result in conversion of
Farmland to non
-
agricultural uses

and would result in no new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2016
Final SEIR
.

Impact Analysis

Air Quality

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

23 4.3

Air Quality

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016 SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do
2016 SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and
/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the
current Ventura County Air
Quality Management Plan?

Page 105 ends

106

N/A

Result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase of
ROC and/or NOx
emissions?

Pages 106
-

113

Yes

Expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant
concentrations of fugitive
dust, carbon monoxide, toxic
air contaminants, and/or San
Joaquin Valley Fever spores?

Pages 113
-

114

N/A

Result in other emi
ssions that
create objectionable odors
adversely affecting a
substantial number of

-
people

Page 114 ends

N/A

Would the project conflict with
or obstruct implementation of the current Ventura County Air Quality Management
Plan
?

The 2016
Final SEIR

determined that the Approved Project does not include any residential uses and would not result in the direct growth of population within the Camarill o Growth Area. Therefore,
the Approved Project would not conflict with the 2007 Ventura County Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) or jeopardize attainment of state and national ambient air quality standards in Ventura County and the impact would be less th
an significant

for the Approved Project
.

The 2022 Ventura County AQMP was
approved by the Ventura County Air Pollution Control

District
(VCAPCD)

on December 13, 2022
. Although the VCAPCD is responsible for regional air quality planning efforts, it does no
t have the authority to directly regulate the air quality issues associated with plans and new development projects within the County. Instead, the VCAPCD has used its expertise and prepared the Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines to indirectl y address
these issues in accordance with the projections and programs of the AQMP. The purpose of the Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines is to assist Lead Agencies, as well as consultants, project proponents, and other interested parties, in

evaluating potential air quality impacts of
projects and plans proposed in Ventura County. For general development projects, the VCAPCD recommends that consistency with the current AQMP be determined by comparing the population generated by the project to

the population projections used in the development of the AQMP. Like City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

24 the Approved Project, the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any residential uses and would not result in the direct growth of population within the Camarillo Growth Ar ea.

Therefore, the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would not conflict with t
he 2022 Ventura
County AQMP and would result in no new or more severe impacts

beyond those identified in the
2016
Final SEIR
.

Would

the
project
result in a cumulatively cons
iderable net increase of ROC and/or NOx
emissions?

The 2016
Final SEIR

determined that
the Approved Project would generate a cumulatively
considerable net increase of ROC and NOx emissions during project construction and operation. The Approved Project wou
ld be required to implement Mitigation Measure AQ
-
2, during

construction,
which would reduce the emissions generated by heavy
-
duty diesel
-
powered construction
equipment operating at the
Project Site
. In addition, during project operation, the Approved Proj ect
would be required to implement Mitigation Measures AQ
-
3, which would require developers to use
low emission water heaters in new buildings and low emission landscaping equipment, AQ -
4, which
requires the developer to implement a
Project Site
-
wide Trans
portation Demand Management
(TDM) program to reduce the number of vehicle trips generated by uses at the Project Site
, and AQ
-
5 which requires the developer to pay to the City TDM fund an applicable mitigation fee per vehicle trip, determined by the City o
f Camarillo Department of Community Development. These mitigation measures are described in detail on pages 108 through 110 of the 2016 Final SEIR
. Compliance with
these mitigation measures would reduce ROC and NOx emissions from the Approved Project to a less than significant level.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses and does not include any c
ommercial uses.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any
future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA
review. As such the Proposed Land Use Reversion P
roject would result in less daily vehicular trips
than the Approved Project due to the lack of commercial uses. In addition, any future development on the
Project Site

would also be subject to
CEQA and if impacts are associated with development
the project

proponent would be required to implement
Mitigation Measures AQ
-
2 through AQ
-
5 described in the 2016
Final SEIR
. Like the Approved Project implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce the cumulative impact of ROC and NOx emissions to a less th an significant
level and
The Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project
would result in no new or more severe impacts
related to
ROC and NOx emissions

beyond those identified in the
2016 Final SEIR
.

Would the project
e
xpose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations of fugitive
dust, carbon monoxide, toxic air contaminants, and/or San Joaquin Valley Fever spores ?

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project would occupy the same
Project Site

as the
Approved

Project and

is not in proximity to reside
nces or other sensitive receptors that could be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations from future development. No new sensitive receptors have been constructed in proximity to the
Project Site

since adoption of the 2016
Final SEIR
.

Furthermore, t
he lack of commercial uses included in the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would
result in less daily vehicular trips than the Approved Project , further lowering the exposure of
sensitive receptors to pollutants. Therefore, the Proposed Land Use Revers ion Project would not
Impact Analysis

Air Quality

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

25 result in new or more severe impacts related to exposure of sensitive receptors to air pollution beyond those identified in the
2016 Final SEIR
.

Would the project r
esult in other emissions that create objectionable odors adversely affecting
a substantial number of people
?

The
2016 Final SEIR

determined that the commercial and light industrial uses of the Project Site

are
not typically associated with odor complaints and there are no sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the
Project Site

that would be offended by objectionable odors. Therefore, it was determined that the potential impacts associated with objectionable

odors would be less than significant

for the
Approved Project
.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M

(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses and does not include any commercial uses.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any
future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA
review.

Odors are typically associated with industrial projects i nvolving the use of chemicals,
solvents, petroleum products, and other strong
-
smelling elements used in manufacturing processes,
as well as sewage treatment facilities and landfills. Office uses are not typically associated with odor complaints.

The types
of
development
activities that would occur at the

Project Site

are not known
at this time,
however,
there
are no sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the
Project Site

to expose
objectionable odors to
. The existing land uses to the west of the
Project Sit
e

are
developed with
industrial
uses
and capable of generating similar od
ors.

Therefore, the Proposed Land Use Reversio
n
Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to the creation of objectionable
odors

beyond those identified in the
20 16 Final SEIR
.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Pr
oject

26 This page intentionally left blank.

Impact Analysis

Biological Resources

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

27 4.4

Biological Resources

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016 SEIR
?

Any New
Info
rmation
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do
2016 SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Have a substantial adverse
effect, either directly or
through habitat
modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations,
or by the California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?

Pages
170

171

Yes

Have a substantial adverse
effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural
community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish
and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Servic
e?

Pages 170
-

171

N/A

Have a substantial adverse
effect on state or federally
protected wetlands
(including, but not limited to,
marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological
interruption, or other
means?

Pages

170
-

171

N/A

Interfere substantially with
the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with
established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery
Project Site
s?

Pages 170
-

171

N/A

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

28 Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the 2016
SEIR?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the 2016
SEIR?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the 2016
SEIR?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do 2016 SEIR
Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Conflict with any local
policies or ordinances
protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or
ordinance?

Pages 170
-

171

N/A

Conflict with the provisions
of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?

Pages 170
-

171

N/A

Would the project
h
ave a
substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and W
ildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
?

Would the project h
ave a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department
of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?

Would the project h
ave a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydr
ological interruption, or other means
?

Would the project i
nterfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of nat
ive wildlife nursery
Project Site
s?

Would the project c
onflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?

Would the project c
onflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?

Until the spring of 2008, the
Project Site

was used for the agricultural production of row crops. The on
-
site
soils were
plowed at the beginning of each planting season and plants were removed at the end of each planting season, of which there were at least two per year. The Project Site

is no longer
under
active
cultivation. The
Project Site

is also bisected
by Ventura

Boul
evard and the extension of
Springville Drive. As such, any natural habitat or sensitive species that may have been at the Project
Site

in the past were removed several decades ago for agricultural operations. There are also no existing trees at the
Project

Site

and the
Project Site

is not considered to be part of an established
Impact Analysis

Biological Resources

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

29 migratory wildlife corridor. The area around the
Project Site

has also been used for agriculture and
urban uses and generally does not support any riparian or other sensitive habitat . The Camarillo
Hills Drain is subject to the California Department of Fish and Game 1603 permit procedures, but no alternation to the drain was proposed as part of the Approved Project.

The 2016
Final SEIR

determined that the Approved Project is not expec
ted to have any impact on
sensitive biological resources. However, the potential exists for migratory burrowing owls and other wildlife to be present at the
Project Site

when construction activities commence. Therefore, the
Approved Project would be requir
ed to implement Mitigation Measures BIO
-
1, which requires a pre
-
construction survey for resident burrowing owls, and BIO -
2, which requires the presence of a
qualified biologist on

the
Project Site

during initial ground disturbance activities. These mitigat ion
measures are described in detail on pages 170 through 171 of the 2016 Final SEIR
. Implementation
of these mitigation measures was found to reduce potential impacts to burrowing owls and wildlife of low mobility to less than significant levels

for the A
pproved Project
.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the develo
pment of up to 525,000
SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project S
ite

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Mitigation Measures

BIO
-
1 and BIO
-
2 would
also apply to any future development under the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project. Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to biological resources

beyond those identi
fied in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

30 This page intentionally left blank.

Impact Analysis

Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

31 4.5

Cultural Resources

and Tribal
Cultural Resources

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do
2016 SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and
/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of
a historical resource
pursuant to

§15064.5?

Pages 171
-

172

N/A

Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of
an archaeological
pursuant to

§15064.5?

Pages 171
-

172

Yes

Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of
a tribal cultural resource,
defined in a Public Resources
Code Section 21074 as either
a
Project Site
, feature, place,
or cultural landscape that is
geographically defined in
terms of the size and s
cope
of the landscape, sacred
place, or object with cultural
value to a California Native
American tribe, and that is:

1. Listed or eligible for
listing in the California
Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local
register of historical
resources as defined in
Public Resources Code
Section 5020.1(k)?

N
/A

N/A

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

32 Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do
2016 SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and
/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Resources C
ode Section
5024.1? In applying the
criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public

Disturb any human remains,
including those interred
outside of formal
cemeteries?

Pages 171
-

17 2

Yes

Would the project c
ause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5?

The 2016
Final SEIR

determined that the
Project Site

has been modified and used for agricultural
purposes for several decades and no structures exist at the Project Site

and therefore, no impacts to
historical resources would occur

for the Approved Project
.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves
the reversion of the land use designation of the
entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Proje ct
does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Pr
oject

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to historical resources

beyond those
identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

Would the project c
ause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to

§15064.5?

The 2016
Final SEIR

determined that
t
here are also no known prehistoric archeological

resources
within the
Project

Site
. It is likely that any surface and subsurface archeological remains that might have once occurred at the
Project Site

would have long since been eliminated by past agricultural activities. However, there is a possibility that archeological resources may still exist below the
surface, and that these remains could be encountered during Project Site

excavation activities.

Therefore,

the Approved Project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure CR -
1,
described in detail on page 172 of the 2016
Fi
nal SEIR
, which would require halting construction if
archaeological
resources
are encountered during development. Implementation of
Mitigation
Measure CR
-
1 would reduce impacts to archeological resources to a less than significant level

for
the Approved P
roject
.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of

up to 525,000
SF

(75 percent) of light
Impact Analys
is

Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

33 industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

woul
d be subject to project level CEQA review.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Any development under
the Proposed Land
Use Reversion Project would also be subject to Mitigation Measure CR -

1. Therefore, the
Proposed
Land Use Reversion Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to

archeological
resources

beyond those identified in the 20
1 6

Final SEIR
.

Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in a Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a Project Site
, feature,
place, or cultural landscape that is geographicall
y defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:

1. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?

2. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivis ion (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the City shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe?

The 2016 Final S
EIR predates the updates to the
CEQA Guidelines
requiring the evaluation of
potential impacts to tribal cultural resources. The following provides a discussion of the City’s consultation efforts as required under Assembly Bill (AB) 52 and Senate Bill (SB)

18. City staff contacted NAHC and requested a contact list of Native Americans culturally affiliated with the project area in August 2023. The City prepared and sent certified mail letters to local Native American groups listed in the results on August

2,
2023. Of the 12 Native American groups,
the
Barbareño/Ventureño Band of Mission Indians

requested consultation. In response the City
provided the tribe with
the project scope, background, and past environmental document s
.

T
h
e

C
i
t
y

s
p
o
k
e

w
i
t
h

Matthew Vestuto of the Barbareno/Ventureno Band of Mission Indians

v
i
a

t
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r

2 8
,

2 0
2 3

a
n
d

a
n
s
w
e
r
e
d

q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s

t
h
e

t
r
i
b
e

h
a
d

r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g

t
h
e

s
c
o
p
e

o
f

t
h
i
s

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.

C
onsultation with the tribe conclu
ded September 28, 2023.

Although the City has not received any
other responses requesting further consultation to date, the City will respond to any
correspondence received from tribal contacts in response to these notices consistent with the requirements

of AB 52 and SB 18
.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

does not include any development or ground disturbing
activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA
review. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Proj
ect

would not result in any new or substantially more
severe impacts to tribal cultural resources beyond those identified in the 2016 Final SEIR.

d
.

Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?

As dis
cussed in
2016
Final SEIR
,
n
o known cemeteries, human remains, or Native American
cultural
resources are located on
or near
the

Project Site
, but the potential to find previously undiscovered
remains cannot be completely ruled out. The
2016
Final SEIR

therefore includes Mitigation Measure
CR
-
3 , which requires that if any human remains are found during construction activities, all activities City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

34 mu
st cease and the
City of Camarillo and County Coroner

must be notified.

Mitigation Measure CR
-
3 also
requires

the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC
) be notified within 24 hours of the
discovery and that guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered to in

the treatment and disposition of
the remains.

Implementation of this mitigation measures would reduce impacts to human remains

a to less than significant level

for the Approved Project
.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of

the land use designation of the
entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25

percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion

Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Any development under the Proposed Land
Use Reversion Project would also be subject to Mitigation Mea sure CR
-

3. Therefore, the
Proposed
Land Use Reversion Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to

human
remains

beyond those identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

Impact Analysis

Energy

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

35 4.6

Energy

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016 SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do
2016 SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and
/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Result in a potentially
significant environmental
impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy
resources, during project
construction or operation?

N/A; New
CEQA
checklist
item
added
subsequent
to 2016
SEIR

N/A

Conflict with or obstruct a
state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy
efficiency?

N/A; New
CEQA
checklist
item added
subsequent
to 2016
SEIR

N/A

Would the project
r
esult in
a
potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?

Impacts to energy were not analyzed in the 2016
Final SEIR
.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion

Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88 -
acre
Project Site

to
Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M (Limited Manufacturing) to allow for
the development of up to 525,000
SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25
percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the Project Site

would be subject to
project level CEQA review.

Although no development is planned at this time on the
Project Site
,
future development under the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would be subject to California
Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24 Part 6:

California’s Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings. Furthermore, new development projects constructed within California after January 1, 2017, including any future development under the Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project
, are subject to the mandatory planning and design, energy efficiency, water efficiency and conservation, material conservation and resources efficiency, and environmental quality measures of the California Green Building Standards (CALGreen) Code (Califor nia Code of Regulations, Title 24,
Part 11). Compliance with these standards during project construction and operation would ensure that the use of energy resources would not occur in a wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary amount and impacts would be less

than significant.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

36 b.

Would the project
c
onflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?

Because no development is proposed for the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
, t
here are
currently no adopted State or local p
lans for renewable energy that are applicable to future development under t
he Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Pr
oject Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

Additionally, a
s
discussed above, future construction and operational activities would be subject to the applicable energy efficiency requirements of Title 24 Part 6 and the CalGreen Code that are i n effect at the
time of development. As such, the project would not conflict with such plans, and no impact would occur.

Impact Analysis

Geology and Soils

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

37 4.7

Geology and Soils

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to the
2016 SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do
2016 SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Directly or
indirectly cause
potential substantial
adverse effects, including
the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving rupture of a
known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most
recent

Alquist
-

Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or
based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault?

Page
s

173
-

174

N/A

Directly or indirectly cause
potential substantial
adverse

effects, including

the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving

strong
seismic
ground shaking?

Page
s

173
-

174

N/A

Directly or indirectly cause
potential substantial
adverse effects, including
the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving

seismic
-
related ground failure,
including

liquefaction?

Page
s

173
-

174

N/A

Directly or indirectly cause
potential substantial
adverse effects, including
the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving landslides?

Page
s

173
-

174

N/A

Result in substantial soil
erosion or the

loss of topsoil
during project

construction
and/or operation?

Page
s

173
-

174

N/A

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

38 Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016

FINAL SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016

FINAL SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to the
2016 FINAL
SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do
2016

FINAL SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Be located on a
geologic
unit or soil that is unstable,
or that would become
unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially
result in on
Project Site

or
off
Project Site

landslide,
lateral spreading,
subsidence,

liquefaction, or
collapse?

Pages 173
-

174

N/A

Be located on expansive
soil, as defined in Table
18 -
1 -
B of the Uniform Building
Code (1994), creating
substantial direct or indirect
risks to life or property?

Pages 173
-

174

N/A

Have soils incapable of
adequately supporting the
use of septic
tanks or
alternative wastewater
disposal systems where
sewers are not available for
the disposal of wastewater?

Pages 173
-

174

N/A

Directly or indirectly destroy
a unique paleontological
resource or
Project Site

or
unique geologic feature?

Pages 171
-

172

Yes

Would the project
d
irectly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist
-

Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?

Would the project
directly

or indirectly cause potential substantial
adverse effects
, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking?

c
.

Would the project
d
irectly

or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic
-
related ground failure, including liquefaction?

Would the project
d
irectly
or indirectly cause potenti
al substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death involving landslides?

Impact Analysis

Geology and Soils

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

39 As discussed
in the 2016
Final SEIR
,
according to the City of Camarillo General Plan, the
Project Site

is not underlain by an active fault, not located in an Alquist -
Priolo Earthquake Fault Hazard zone,
and is not located within a landslide/mudslide hazard zone.

Although the
Project Site

is located in an
area with liquefaction potential, the suitability of

the
Project Site

to support non
-
residential
development has been evaluated in the
Preliminary Due Diligence Geotechnical Investigation, 50 Acre Agricultural Property, South of 101 Freeway and Bajo Agua, City of Camarillo, California

prepared by Geolabs
-

Westlake Village

(Geo
l
abs, 20
05 )
.

An update to this report was prepared by
Geolabs
-

Westlake Village in 2010 to account for a new building code. The City of Camarillo has independently reviewed and approved the information presented in the two reports.

T
he two reports demonstrate that the development of the
Project Site

with non
-
residential uses is
feasible from a geotechnical perspective with no unusual risk or geotechnical hazard. Standard engineering practices as specified in the two technical reports would ensure that the project
developments would not pose a significant risk to people or structures in the event of a seismic activity. Therefore, the 2016 Final PEIR determined that potential impacts associated with geology and soils would be less than s
ignificant

for the Approved Project
.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to
allow for the development of up to 525,000
SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future developm ent on
the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to

potential adverse geologic effects

beyond those identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

e
.

Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?

As discussed
in the 2016 Final PEIR,

there are no natural watercourses at the
Project Site

and
Project
Site

does not drain towards any natural watercourse. Stormwater runoff from the Proposed Land
Use Reversion
Project Site

would continue to flow towards the drains on West Ventura Boulevard.

These drains were sized to accommodate the development of the Project
Site

along with nearby
properties. Therefore, the
Approved Project
would not alter the existing drainage pattern of the
Project Site

or area in a manner which would result in substantial
soil erosion or the loss of topsoil

and therefore the 2016 Final PEIR

determined that impact
s

would be less than significant

for the
Approved Project
.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and
zoning to all L
-
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground
disturbing activities and any future development on
the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same

as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related soil erosion

beyond those identified
in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Us
e Reversion Project

40 f
.

Would the project b
e located on a geolog
ic unit or soil that is unstable
, or that would become
unstable

as a result of the project, and potentially result in on -

or off
-
Project Site

landslide,
lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?

g
.

Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -
1 -
B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?

As discussed in the 201
6 Final
S
EIR,
the suitability of the
Project Site

to support non
-
residential
development has been evaluated in the
2005 Geolab
s

report referenced above
. An update to this
report was prepared by Geolabs
-

Westlake Village in 2010 to account

for a new buildi
ng code. The
City of Camarillo has independently reviewed and approved the information presented in the two reports.

The two reports demonstrate that the development of the Project Site

with non
-
residential uses is
feasible from a geotechnical perspective with no unusual risk or geotechnical hazard. Standard engineering practices as specified in the two technical reports would ensure that the project developments would not pose a signifi
cant risk to people or structures in the event of a seismic activity. These types of measures are required of all new development in Camarillo. Therefore, the 2016 Final PEIR determined that potential impacts associated with unstable or expansive soils

wou
ld
be less than significant

for the Approved Project
.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited M
anufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and an y future development on
the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when was analyzed in the

2016 Final SEIR.

Compliance with existing

building codes
would ensure that impacts related to

unstable or

expansive soils
would be less than

significant
.

Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would not result in new or more severe impacts rel
ated to

unstable or expansive soils
beyond those identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

h
.

Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?

As discussed
in the 2016
Final SEIR

wastewater from the Approv
ed Project would be conveyed by
sewer lines and treated by the Camarillo Sanitary District.

Therefore,
the

2016 Final SEIR determined
that the
Approved Project

would

not

involve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems
, and
no geo
logical impact
s

from implementation
of
septic tanks
would occur

for
the Approved Project
.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Developm
ent) and zoning to all L
-
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development o
r ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are

the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Future development under the Proposed
Impact Analysis

Geology and Soils

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

41 Land Use Reversion Project would be conveyed by sewer lines and treated by the Camarillo Sanitary District.

Therefore,
the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
woul
d

not

involve the use of septic
tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems

and

would not result in new or more severe
impacts related to

the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems

beyond those
identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

i
.

Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or Project Site

or unique
geologic feature?

The 2016
Final SEIR

determined that there are also no known paleontological r esources within the
Project Site
. It is likely that any surface and subsurface paleontological remains that might have once occurred at the
Project Site

would have long since been eliminated by past agricultural activities. However, there is a possibility
that paleontological resources may still exist below the surface, and that these remains could be encountered during Project Site

excavation activities.

Therefore, the Approved Project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure CR -
2,
described in de
tail on page 172 of the 2016
Final SEIR
, which would require halting construction if
paleontological resources are encountered during development. Implementation of these Mitigation Measure CR
-
2 would reduce impacts to paleontology resources

from the Appro
ved
Project

to a less than significant level.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufact
uring) to allow for the development of up to 525,000
SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any futur e development on
the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 F
inal SEIR.

Any development under the Proposed Land
Use Reversion Project would also be subject to Mitigation Measure CR -

2. Therefore, the
Proposed
Land Use Reversion Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to

paleontological resource
s

beyond those identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

42 This page intentionally left blank.

Impact Analysis

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

43 4.8

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016 SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do
2016 SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and
/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Generate greenhouse gas
emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the
environment?

Pages
127

130

N/A

Conflict with an

applicable
plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for

the purpose

of
reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?

Pag
es
130
-

131

N/A

Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?

The 2016
Final SEIR

determined that the Approved Project would yield an efficiency of

1.69 metric
tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
(MTCO
2 e)

of
Green House Gases (
GHGs
)

per service population
member
. The GHG emissions

per service population member would be substantially less than the then
South Coast Air Quality Management District
’s (SCAQMD) draft threshold of 4.8 MTCO
2 e per
service population. Therefore the 2016
Final SEIR

concluded that the City of Camarillo, as lea
d
agency, may conclude that the GHG emissions generated in association with the Approved Project would not have a significant impact on the environment.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entir
e 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses and does not
include any commercial uses.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any
future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA
review.

The number of employees at
the proposed office and light industrial uses has not been identified at this time. However, the total service population can be roughly estimated by dividing the number of potential daily vehicle trips by two.

The vehicle trip numbers are divided by two s
ince each service
population member would make one trip to the site and one trip from

the site (one person, two
trips). This is a very conservative assumption since each vehicle is assumed to accommodate only one person, whereas, many of the vehicles would

accommodate more than one person.

As
discussed in the 2016 Final SEIR the Approved Project would generate approximately 10,548 vehicle trips per day. Dividing this number by two identifies a conservative project service population of approximately 5,274 e
mployees, customers, and vendors.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

44 The

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would result in less daily vehicular trips than the Approved Project due to the lack of commercial uses

and

as such,

it can be deduced that future
development at under the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would yield

an efficiency of less
than

1.69 MTCO
2 e

of GHGs per service population member
. Th
is

analysis demonstrates that the
GHG emissions per service population member would be substantially less than the SCAQMD’s draft

2035
efficiency targets
of

3.0 MTCO
2 e

per ser
vice population.

Therefore,
it can be deduced that
given the number of vehicle trips generated from the Project Site at the maximum buildout potential for light industrial and office use,
the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would not
result in new or m
ore severe impacts

GHG emissions

beyond those identified in the 201
6 Final
SEIR
.

Would the project c
onflict with an applicable plan, policy, or reg
ulation adopted for the purpose

of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?

The 2016
Final SEIR

dete
rmined that the Approved Project’s efficiency of 1.69 MTCO 2 e of GHGs per
service population member would be consistent with
the goal of
AB
32 to reduce statewide GHG
emissions to 1990 levels by 2020

and therefore it would be consistent with AB 32. The
Prop
osed
Land Use Reversion Project

would also be subject to the energy efficiency requirements of the Title 24 CalGreen Code. Based on this information, the 2016
Final SEIR

concluded that the Approved
Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy

or regulation for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of GHGs and the impact of the Approved Project would be less than significant.

As shown in the analysis above, future development under the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would yield an efficien
cy of less than
the

1.69 MTCO
2 e

of GHGs per service population member

generated by the Approved Project
, and thus it would also be consistent with the AB 32 and GHG reduction targets set by SCAQMD. As such, future development under the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
would not result in new or more severe impacts
to GHG reduction plans, policies
or regu
lations
beyond those identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

Impact Analysis

Hazards and Hazardous Materials

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

45 4.9

Hazards and Hazardous Materials

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do
2016 SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Create a
significant hazard to
the public or the
environment through the
routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous
materials?

Pages
175

N/A

Create a significant hazard to
the public or the
environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset
and
accident conditions
involving the release of
hazardous materials into the
environment?

Page

175

N/A

Emit hazardous emissions or
handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within
one quarter

mile of an
existing or proposed school?

Page 175 ends

N/A

Be located on a
Project Site

that is included on a list of
hazardous material
Project
Site
s compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the
environment?

Page 175 ends

N/A

Not comply with the
Adopted

Land Use
Compatibility Standards in
the Safety Zones of the
Airport Comprehensive Land
Use Plan for Ventura County

and/or the Height
R
estriction Zones for

Camarillo Airport?

Page
s

175
-

17 7

N/A

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

46 Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do
2016 SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Substantially physically
interfere with the

City’s
designated evacuation
routes?

Page 177 ends

N/A

Expose people or structures
,
either directly or
indirectly,

to a significant risk of loss,
injury, or

death involving
wildland fires
?

Page 177 ends

N/A

Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials?

Would the project
create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?

The 2016
Final SEIR

deter
mined that
the industrial uses at the
Project Site

could involve the
transport, storage, and use of hazardous materials. However, it is expected that all such materials would be transported, stored, and used in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations.

V
ehicles that transport such material
s are regulated by
federal and state agencies

and t
he storage of
hazardous materials is regulated by federal and state regulations and is verified through inspections by the
Ventura County
Fire Department. The use of hazardous materials is regulated by fed eral and
state Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) agencies.

Given all of the federal and
state regulatory requirements
, the 2016
Final SEIR

concluded that compliance with the applicable
regulations ensures that potential operational impac
ts associated with hazardous materials at the
Project Site

are less than significant

for the Approved Project
.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (R
esearch and Development) and zoning to all L
-
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not inclu
de any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

Although, no actual buildings are
proposed at this time and

future uses
are
un
known,
and because
t
he
Proposed L
and Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project would not result in new or more s
evere impacts related to

hazardous materials

beyond
those identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

Impact Analysis

Hazards and Hazardous Materials

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

47 c
.

Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school?

There are no sensitive receptors in close proximity to the Project Site
,
the nearest school

–

Gateway
Community School
–

is located approximately .85 mile
s

southeast of the
Project Site
. Therefore,
similar to what was concluded in the 2016
Final
SEIR
, the
Land Use Reversion Project

would result in
less than significant impacts to schools.

Would the project
be located on a
Project Site

that is included on a list of hazardous material
Project Site
s compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65
962.5 and, as a result, would it
create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?

Phase I Environmental
Project Site

Assessment (ESA) produced by Anacapa Geoservices in 2005

(Anacapa, 2005)
found that
the
Project Site

is not included on any
federal, state, or local listing of
hazardous materials
Project Site
s and none are located in the vicinity of the
Project Site
. The only
issue of potential concern identified during the Phase I ESA investigation was the possibility of farm -
related pesticid
es, herbicides, and other farm chemicals occurring in the soil as a result of the normal, legal application of these materials by the previous farming activity. A Limited Phase II ESA was subsequently prepared to

evaluate this possibility. The analysis con
cluded that
Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT)
and its break
-
down by
-
products
D
ichlorodiphenyldichloroethane

(DDD) and D
ichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene

(DDE), as well as
Chlordane, alpha
-
Chlordane, and gamma
-
Chlordane were detected at locations within t
he
Project
Site
. However, no detected concentrations exceeded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recommended preliminary remediation goals for these products. As such, the soils at the Project
Site

w
ere

not

considered

hazardous waste and impacts
asso
ciated with implementation of the
Approved Project
would be less than significant.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) an
d zoning to all L
-
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or groun
d disturbing activities and any future development on
the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

Although, no actual buildings are
proposed at this time and
future uses are unknown
,
and because
t
he
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

i
s

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project would not result in new or more severe impacts
related to

hazardous material
Project Site
s
beyond those identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

For a project located in an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would t he project result in a safety
hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?

As described in the 2016
Final SEIR

the
Project Site

is located
directly north of
Camarillo

Airport

is
located within the Airport Specific Plan and
t
he Compatible Land Use Plan (CLUP) for Camarillo
Airport
, which included in
the Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Ventura County. The southern portion of the
Project Site

is located within the

Height Restriction Zone (HRZ), which
restricts structure

height to a 7:1 ratio

measured

from the airport runway

elevation starting at the
northerly airport property line
. The
Project Site

is also located within the Traffic Pattern Zone (TPZ).

The CLUP allows for office and industrial uses provided that the stru ctural coverage of industrial and
City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

48 office uses within the TPZ
, provided they do

not exceed 50 percent
maximum structural coverage
and that an avigation easement, and fair disclosure and covenant be recorded by the owner and developer of the properties withi
n the TPZ.

The 700,000
SF

of building space included in the Approved Project would represent a maximum structural coverage of 34 percent of the
Project Site
, which would not exceed the 50 percent
recommendation for properties within the TPZ. According to t he Specific Plan, the
Project Site

is
located within the 2
-
story airport building height zone, which specifies a maximum height of 35 feet for two
-
story buildings, exclusive of architectural elements such as towers, cupolas, etc. Special purpose buildings
requiring heights in excess of two stories may be considered under a conditional use permit. Under no circumstance, however, may building heights (including architectural features) exceed the FAR Part 77 or CLUP height restrictions and established avigatio nal easements.

Future buildings planned under the Approved Project would be reviewed by the C
ity
Planning
Department and Building Department
during the Industrial Planned Development (IPD) approval process to ensure that the maximum building elevations, excluding various architectural features, at the
Project Site

would not exceed the height zone and avigational easement standards. The city als o
forwards the building plans for projects near Camarillo Airport to the Airport Manager for review and comment for consistency with all applicable height and density restrictions, and applicable avigation easements. As an industrial and/or office developm ent, the Approved Project is unlikely to
include uses that could conflict with airport operations, electronic communications or navigational aids that could potentially be associated with research and development activities as detailed in the EIR for the A
irport North Specific Plan. However, the city requires as a standard condition of approval that the project developers sign an agreement indicating that any electromagnetic disturbance that causes interference with radio transmission, aircraft, instruments , navigational
aides, or other electromagnetic receptors, shall be modified or abated upon the written request by the Camarillo Airport Authority. Consequently, the 2016 Final SEIR

found that impacts related to
airport safety hazards

for the Approved Proje
ct

would be less than significant.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 52 5,000
SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subj
ect to project level CEQA review.

Although, no actual buildings are
proposed at this time and the actual occupants of the future buildings at the Project Site

are not
known, t
he
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the

Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

The 700,000
SF

of building space included in the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
would
represent a maximum structural coverage of 34 percent of the Project Site
, which would not exceed
the 50 percent recommendation for properties within the TPZ.

It would also be subject to the same
regulations and approval procedures as the Approved Project. Therefore, the Proposed Land Use
Reversion Project would not

result in new or more severe impacts related to

airport safety hazards
beyond those identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

Impact Analysis

Hazards and Hazardous Materials

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

49 f
.

Would the project
impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation pl
an?

The 2016
Final SEIR

found that the approved project would not generate sufficient traffic to create severe traffic congestion, nor would it interfere with emergency access to the Project Site
. The
internal roadways and driveways would be designed in ac cordance with all City regulations,
including those pertaining to emergency access. Consequently, the 2016 Final SEIR

determined that
impacts associated with emergency access would be less than significant

for the Approved Project
.

The Proposed Land Use Re
version Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of

light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses and does not include any commercial uses .

As such the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would result in less daily vehicular trips than the Approved Project due to the lack of
commercial uses.

In addition, internal roadways and driveways
constructed under future development under the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would be designed in accordance with all City regulations, including those pertaining to emergency access.

Ther
efore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to

emergency access
beyond those identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

g
.

Would the project e
xpose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk
of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires?

The 2016
Final SEIR

determined that
the
Project Site

is located within a developed area and there
are no adjacent wildlands

that would be subject to wildfire
. U.S. Highway 101 is located
to the
immediate north of the
Project Site
. Camarillo Airport and the Camarillo Hills Drain are located to the immediate south of the
Project Site
. U.S. Highway 101 / Springville Drive Interchange

is located
to the east of the
Project Site

an
d the area to
the west of the
Project Site

is largely developed with
industrial uses. Therefore,

the 2016
Final SEIR

concluded that

no impact associated with wildland
fires would occur

for the Approved Project
.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the revers ion of the land use designation of the
entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

T
he
Proposed Land Use Rev
ersion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
conditions are the same as
when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
would not result in new or more severe impacts
related to

wildland fires
beyond those identified in
the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

50 This page intentionally left blank.

Impact Analysis

Hydrology and Water Quality

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

51 4.10

Hydrology and Water Quality

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the 2016
SEIR?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the 2016
SEIR?

Do New
Cir
cumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the 2016 SEIR?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do 2016 SEIR
Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Violate any water
quality
standards or waste discharge
requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface
or ground water quality?

Pages 178
-
179

N/A

Substantially decrease
groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially
with groundwater
recharge such that
the
project may impede
sustainable groundwater
management of the
basin?

Page 179 ends

N/A

Substantially alter the
existing drainage pattern of
the
Project Site

or area,
including through the
alteration of the course of a
stream or river or through
the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which
would result in substantial
erosion or siltation on
-

or
off
-
Project Site
?

Pages 178
-
179

N/A

Substa
ntially alter the
existing drainage pattern of
the
Project Site

or area,
including through the
alteration of the course of a
stream or river or through
the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which
would substantially increase
the rate or amount o
f
surface runoff in a manner
which would result in
flooding on
-

or off
-
Project
Site
?

Page 180 ends

N/A

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

52 Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the 2016
SEIR?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the 2016
SEIR?

Do New
Cir
cumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the 2016 SEIR?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do 2016 SEIR
Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Substantially alter the
existing drainage pattern of
the
Project Site

or area,
including through the
alteration of the course of a
stream or river or through
the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which
would create or contribute
runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of
existing or planned
stormwater draina
ge
systems or provide
substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?

Pages 178
-
179

N/A

Substantially alter the
existing drainage pattern of
the
Project Site

Page 180 ends

N/A

Be located in a flood hazard
zone and risk release of
pollutants due to
project
inundation?

Page 180 ends

N/A

Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of a water
quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater
management plan?

Page 179 ends

N/A

Impact Analysis

Hydrology and Water Quality

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

53 a.

Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?

Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Project Site

or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or riv er or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on -

or
off
-
Project Site
?

Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Project Site

or area,
including thr
ough the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide s ubstantial
additional sources of polluted runoff?

As described in the 2016 Final SEIR, the
Approved Project
would require a General Construction
Activity Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) prior to the start of construc
tion. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requires that a Notice of Intent (NOI) be filed with the SWRCB. One of the conditions of the General Permit is the development and the implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Pl an (SWPPP). The
SWPPP identifies structural and nonstructural Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented, such as sandbag barriers, temporary desilting basins near inlets, gravel driveways, dust controls, employee training, and general good houseke eping practices. As described in the
2016 Final SEIR, with implementation of the applicable permit requirements and the application of BMPs specifically designed to minimize construction
-
related water quality impacts, construction of
the Approved project w
ould not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements.

During operation, the project applicant would be required to submit a Post Construction Stormwater Management Plan which identifies
Project Site
-
specific source control and trea
tment
control measures that minimize impervious surfaces to the maximum extent practicable. With the compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations, Code requirements, and permit provisions, the 2016 Final SEIR determined the Approved

Project would not violate any water
quality standards or waste discharge requirements during operation and impacts would be less than significant.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.
88 -
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to p
roject level CEQA review. Consistent with the 2016 Final SEIR, any
future development would

also

be subject to local, state and federal regulations governing the release of pollutants and ensure post development stormwater run -
off flows are equal to or les
s
than pre
-
development conditions. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would not have a
substantial adverse effect related to water quality and would result in no new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2016 Final SEIR.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

54 b.

Would the
project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?

h
.

Would the project conflict with or obstruct
implementation of a water quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater management plan?

As described in the 2016 Final SEIR, groundwater would be source of potable water for the Approved Project and water demand for the Approved Project would be substan tially less than the
historic groundwater use at the
Project Site
. The
Project Site

is not a source of groundwater
recharge and storm water would not be required to percolate at the Project Site

to recharge area
aquifers. The 2016 Final SEIR determined the

Approved Project would not substantially deplete
groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge and the impact of the project on groundwater supplies would be less than significant.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

involv
es the reversion of the land use designation of the
entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses

and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review, including an

analysis of potential
water demand. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would not have a substantial adverse
effect related to groundwater and would result in no new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Would the
project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Project Site

or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would substantially increase the ra te or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on -

or off
-
Project Site
?

Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Project Site

or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a strea m or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which would impede or redirect flood flows?

Would the project be located in a flood hazard zone and risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?

As described in the 2016 Fin
al SEIR, the
Project Site

is not within an inundation zone or dam failure
hazard area, and the
Project Site

is not located within a 100
-
year flood zone

and n
o impacts would
occur

with implementation of the Approved Project
.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
i
ndustrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would not have a substantial adverse effect related to flood hazards and would result in no new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2016 Fi nal SEIR.

Impact Analysis

Land Use and Planning

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

55 4.11

Land Use and Planning

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the 2016
SEIR?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the 2016
SEIR?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the 2016 SEIR?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially

More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do 2016 SEIR
Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Physically divide an
established neighborhood or
community?

Pages 58
-
59 No

N/A

Cause a significant
environmental impact due to
a

conflict with any land use
plan, policy, or regulation or
applicable goal or policy from
the City of Camarillo General
Plan that was adopted for
the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental
effect?

Pages 59
-
67 No

N/A

Would the
project physically divide an established neighborhood or community?

As described in the 2016 Final SEIR, the
Project Site

does not contain any residential communities on
or adjacent to the
Project Site

and the infill project would not divide an established

community.

There would be no impact

for the Approved Project
.

The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review. The
Project Site

is part of the Airport
North Specific Plan and has remained undeveloped, surrou nded by industrial and commercial
development.

Similarly, t
he
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would not divide an established
neighborhood or community and would result in no new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2016 Final SEIR.

b
.

Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation or applicable goal or policy from the City of Camarillo General Plan that was adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?

As described in the 2016 Final SEIR, the Approved Project would be consistent with all applicable standards and policies contained in the Land Use, Circulation, Recreation, Community Design, Safety and Noise Elements of the City of Ca
marillo General Plan. Impacts were determined to be less than significant

for the Approved Project
.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

56 The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and

Development) and zoning to all L
-
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

does not include any deve
lopment or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review. The
Project Site

is part of the Airport
North Specific Plan and following the proposed general plan amendment and zoning r eversion, the
Project Site

would be subject to all applicable Industrial land use policies and Limited Manufacturing zoning requirements. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would result in no new or more
severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2
016 Final SEIR.

Impact Analysis

Mineral Resources

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

57 4.12

Mineral Resources

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the 2016
SEIR?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the 2016
SEIR?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the 2016
SEIR?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do 2016 SEIR
Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Result in the loss of
availability of a known
mineral resource that would
be of value to the region
and the
residents of the
state?

Pages 180
-
181

N/A

Result in the loss of
availability of a locally
important mineral resource
recovery
Project Site

delineated in the City of
Camarillo General Plan,
specific plan, or other
applicable land use plan?

Pages 180
-
181

N/A

Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and th
e residents of the state?

Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery
Project Site

delineated in the City of Camarillo General Plan, specific plan, or other applicable land use plan?

The 2016 SEIR did not identify any mineral resources of statewide significance in the Camarillo area and the Camarillo General Plan does not identify any locally -
important mineral resource recovery
Project Site
s on the
Project Site
. The 2016 Final SEIR fou
nd that there would be no impacts to
mineral resources

for the Approved Project
.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project is located on the same Project Site as the Approved Project and no oil extraction or mineral extraction activities have been conducted on the Project
Site.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the de
velopment of up to 525,000
SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would not include any development or ground disturbing activities and there are known mineral resources
at the
Project Site

(Camarillo 2006).

Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would not
result in the loss of known mineral resources

and would no new or more severe impacts
would occur beyond those identified in the 2016 Final SEIR.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

58 This page intentionally left blank.

Impact Analysis

Noise

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

59 4.13

Noise

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do Ne
w
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do
2016 SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Generate
construction noise
levels that exceed the Noise
Ordinance exterior or
interior noise standards at
residential properties during
the hours specified in
Section 10.34.120 of the
City of Camarillo Municipal
Code?

Pages
140
-

14 2

N/A

Generate a substantial
temporary
(nonconstruction) or
permanent increase in noise
levels at existing sensitive
receptors in the vicinity of
the
Project Site
?

Page
s
143

1 46

N/A

Generate excessive ground
borne vibration?

Page
s 142
-

143

N/A

Expose people residing or
working in the project area
to excessive noise levels
from aircraft operations
from Camarillo Airport?

Pages 14
6 -

14 7

N/A

Would the project
g
enerate construction noise levels that exceed the Noise Ordinance exterior
or interior noise standards at residential properties during the hours specified in Section

10.34.120 of the City of Camarillo Municipal Code
?

The 2016
Final SEIR

determined that construction activities associated with the Approved Proje ct
would not exceed any of the standards of the City of Camarillo Noise Ordinance since the Project
Site

is located in a commercial and industrial area of the city and is not located in close proximity to any sensitive uses such as residences.

In addition,

the future uses at the
Project Site

would also be
subject to all applicable standards of the City of Camarillo Noise Ordinance for new sources of noise.

Therefore, the
2016
Final SEIR

concluded that the construction and operational impact of the Approved
Project would be less than significant.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing)
to allow for the development of up to 525,000
SF

(75 percent) of light
City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

60 industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future devel opment on
the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

The

Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SE
IR.

As such,
Project Site

is located in a
commercial and industrial area of the city and is not located in close proximity to any sensitive uses such as residences.

In addition, the future uses at the
Project Site

would also be subject to all
applicable st
andards of the City of Camarillo Noise Ordinance for new sources of noise. Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to

noise levels

beyond those identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

b
.

Would the project
g
enerate a substantial temporary (nonconstruction) or permanent increase in noise levels at existing sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the Project Site
?

The 2016
Final SEIR

discussed how
locations in the vicinity of the
Project Site

would experience a
slight increase in noise resulting from the additional traffic generated by the industrial project.

The
2016
Final SEIR

determined that the traffic generated by the industrial project would increase local noise levels by a maximum of 0.5

decibels A
(
dBA
)

Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), which
would be imperceptible to most people and would not exceed the applicable thresholds of significance for the affected existing land uses.

As discussed above, the
Project Site

is located in a
commercial and industrial area of the city and
is not located in close proximity to any sensitive uses such as residences. Therefore
, the
2016
Final SEIR

determined
this

impact would be less than
significant for the Approved Project.

The Proposed Land Use
Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent)
of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level C
EQA review.

The

Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when
it
was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Similar to the Approved Project, locations
in the vicin
ity of the
Project Site

would experience a slight increase in noise resulting from the additional traffic generated by future development.

Additionally, when future

uses
are proposed
,
the

resulting
developmen
t would
create

less daily vehicular trips than

anticipated for

the Approved
Project
because

new
commercial uses
would be built thus,
less noise would result from
additional traffic

related to those commercial uses
. As discussed

above, the
Project Site

is located in
a

commercial and industrial area and
is not located in close proximity to any sensitive uses .

Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to

noise levels

at sensitive receptors
beyond those ident
ified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

c
.

Would the project

g
enerate excessive ground borne vibration?

The 2016
Final SEIR

describes how
construction activities that would occur at the
Project Site

have
the potential to generate low levels of ground

borne

vibration. However, nearby industrial uses are
not considered to be sensitive to ground
-
borne vibration and the resulting ground
-
borne vibration
levels would not exceed any adopted standards for th
ese uses. The Approved Project did not include
uses that are expected to generate measurable levels of ground borne vibration during operation.

Therefore, the greatest regular source of project
-
related ground borne vibration would be from
trucks making del
iveries and larger garbage trucks picking
-
up refuse material generated by the
I
mpact Analysis

Noise

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

61 project occupants. However,
because
there are no sensitive
uses
in the vicinity of the
Project Site
,

the 2016
Final SEIR

concluded that impacts related to ground borne vibration would be less than
significant

for the Approved Project
.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 52 5,000
SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subj
ect to project level CEQA review.

The

Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Construction activities that would o
ccur
during future development under the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
have the potential to
generate low levels of ground

borne

vibration. However, nearby industrial uses are not considered to be sensitive to ground
-
borne vibration and the resulting

ground
-
borne vibration levels would not
exceed any adopted standards for these uses. Future industrial uses are also not expected to generate measurable levels of ground borne vibration during operation.

T
he greatest regular source
of project
-
related grou
nd borne vibration would be from trucks making deliveries and larger garbage trucks picking
-
up refuse material generated by the project occupants. However, there are no uses that are sensitive to ground
-
borne vibration in the vicinity of the
Project Site

a
nd

the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to

ground borne vibration
beyond those identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

d
.

Would the project

e
xpose people residing or working in the project area to excess ive noise
levels from aircraft operations from Camarillo Airport?

The 2016
Final SEIR

describes how the
Project Site

is located to the north of Camarillo Airport.

According to the Noise Element of the City of Camarillo General Plan, future noise levels at the
Project Site

attributable to Camarillo Airport would not exceed 65 dBA CNEL. These average noise levels would not exceed the City’s 75 dBA CNEL external noise standard for commercial, industrial, and office uses. Higher noise levels would occur when in dividual aircraft fly over the
Project Site
.

These aircraft are nearly all propeller airplanes and helicopters. These noise levels would primarily affect people walking outdoors within the
Project Site

but are not the
like
higher noise levels
associated wi
th jet aircraft that would possibly be considered to be excessive. Therefore, the 2016 Final SEIR

determined that impacts related the aircraft operations from the Camarillo Airport would be less than significant

for the Approved Project
.

The Proposed Land

Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Proje ct
does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

The

Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Pr
oject

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

According to the Noise Element of the City of
Camarillo General Plan, future noise levels at the
Project Site

attributable to Camarillo Airport would
not exceed 65
dBA CNEL. These average noise levels would not exceed the City’s 7 5

dBA CNEL
standards for industrial and office uses.

Higher noise levels would occur when individual aircraft fly over the
Project Site
. These aircraft are nearly all propeller airplanes and

helicopters. These noise
levels would primarily affect people walking outdoors
at
the
Project
Site but

are not the higher noise
City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

62 levels associated with jet aircraft that would possibly be considered to be excessive.

Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversi
on Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related aircraft operations from the Camarillo Airport
beyond those identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

Impact Analysis

Population and Housing

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

63 4.14

Population and Housing

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the 2016
SEIR?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require

Major
Revisions to
the 2016
SEIR?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the 2016 SEIR?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do 2016 SEIR
Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Induce substantial unplanned
population growth in an area,
either directly

or indirectly?

Pages 181
-
182

N/A

Displace substantial numbers
of existing people or housing,
necessitating the
construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?

Pages 181
-
182

N/A

Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly) or indirectly?

Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?

The 2016 Final SEIR
described how

the Approved Project would not displace any housing units and that 25 percent of the 980 employees generated by the Approved Project would demand housing in the
city
. The 2016 FEIR determined that existing and future housing stock in the City would be suf
ficient to accommodate the 245 new employees of the Approved Project.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to al l L
-
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

does not include any development and there are no housi ng units on the
Project Site
. Any future
development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review. Therefore, because
no new employees or residents would be introduced to the site, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

would not resu
lt in new or more severe impacts related to population and housing beyond those identified in the 2016 Final SEIR.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

64 This page intentionally left blank.

Impact Analysis

Public Services and Recreation

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

65 4.15

Public Services and Recreation

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the 2016
SEIR?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require

Major
Revisions to
the 2016
SEIR?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the 2016 SEIR?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do 2016 SEIR
Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or
physically altered
governmental facilities, or
the need for new or
physically altered
governmental facilities, the
construction of
which could
cause significant
environmental impacts, in
order to maintain
acceptable service ratios,
response times or other
performance objectives for
any of the public services:

1. Fire protection?

Pages 183
-
184

N/A

2. Police
protection?

Page 184 ends

N/A

3. Schools?

Page 184 ends

N/A

4. Parks?

Page 185 ends

N/A

5. Other public facilities?

Page 185 ends

N/A

Increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational
facilities such that
substantial
physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be
accelerated?

Pages 185
-
186

N/A

Include recreational facilities
or require the construction
or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an
adverse physical
effect on
the environment?

Pages 185
-
186

N/A

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

66 a.

Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, or othe r public facilities?

Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?

Would the project include

recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?

The 2016 Final SEIR describes how the Approved Project would not require the development of new fir
e department, or police facilities. School impact fees would also mitigate potential impacts to schools to a less than significant level. Furthermore, the Approved Project would not generate substantial unforeseen employment or population growth and, there fore, impacts to park services
or other public facilities would be less than significant. Therefore, t he 2016 Final SEIR determined
that the Approved Project would result in less than significant impacts related to public services and recreation.

The Propo
sed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

does not include any development and would not require police or fire protection services. As discussed in Section 4.14,
Population an
d Housing
, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would
not induce
population
growth

into the area of the Project Site
, therefore demand for school, parks
and recreation facilities, or other governmental facilities would not increase.

Additionally, a
ny
fu
ture development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

Future
development would also be subject to school and park impact fees.

Therefore, the
Proposed Land
Use Reversion Project

would not result in new or more severe impacts related to public services and recreation beyond those identified in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Impact Analysis

Transportation

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

67 4.16

Transportation

Wher
e was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
Final SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016
Final SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016 Final
SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do
2016 Final
SEIR
M
itigation
Me
asures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Conflict with a program,
plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation
system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?

Page 87 ends

88 N/A

N/A

Conflict or be
inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.3(b) for the
reduction of vehicle miles
travelled (VMT)?

N/A; New
CEQA
checklist
item added
subsequent
to 2016
SEIR

N/A

Substantially increase
hazards due to a geometric
design feature
(e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous
intersections) or
incompatible use (e.g., farm
equipment)?

Page
83 -

85 No

N/A

Result in inadequate
emergency access?

Page 8 ends

5 -
8 6

N/A

Would the project
conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation
system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?

The 2016
Final
SEIR found implementation of the Approved Project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting
alternative transportation and no mitigation was required, impacts were less than significant.

The 2016

Final

SEIR
determined that
the Approved Project does
not include any facilities for alternative transportation, nor does it remove, replace or preclude the
use of public transportation by future
occupants or visitors to the project site
.

As described in
S
ection
4 .11
Land Use and Planning

of this document, the
Proposed Land Use
Reversion Project
would be consistent with all applicable Camarillo General Pla n Circulation Element
policies for circulation patterns and design, and alternative modes of transportation.

The Proposed
Land Use Reversion
Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88 -
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Res
earch and Development) and zoning to all L
-
M (Limited
Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light industrial
uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Rev
ersion Project

68 include

any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the Project
Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

When development projects are proposed at the
Project Site

the

applicants

would be subject to all applicable circ
ulation
and transportation plans
relevant to the Project Site
.

Therefore, implementation of the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway,

bicycle, and pedestrian facilities.

Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?

CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)
, which was added to the CEQA Guidelines as part
of the update ado
pted by the State in November 2018,

defines acceptable criteria for analyzing
transportation impacts under CEQA
. It states that

land use

project
s

with vehicle miles
travel
ed
(VMT)
exceeding an applicable threshold of significance may indicate a significant impact, and that projects that decrease
VMT
compared to existing conditions should be presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact.

While the
2016
Final SEIR

did

not include
a VMT

analysis,
development under
both the
Approved
Project and the
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project
constitute

infill development
,

that
would generally re
duce VMT compared to greenfield
development

(new development on lands not previously
planned for development)
.

Additionally
,

the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would result in less daily vehicular trips than the Approved Project due to the
removal of approved

commercial uses

at the Project Site, and commercial uses
generate more traff
ic than commercial retail uses
. Therefore, the Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project would

not

result in new or more severe impacts related to its potential to conflict with or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b) .

Would t
he project
substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible use (e.g., farm equipment)?

The 2016 Final SEIR recommended implementation of Mitigation Measure TC -
1, which would
r
equire the developer to install a traffic signal at the intersection of West Ventura Boulevard (east
-
west segment) and “A” Street when traffic conditions warrant a signal.

The 2016 Final SEIR

concluded that Mitigation measure TC
-
1 would ensure that the int
ersection of West Ventura
Boulevard (east
-
west segment) and “A” Street would operate at LOS A and reduce the potential impact of the Approved Project to less

than

significant levels.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 52 5,000
SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subj
ect to project level CEQA review. Since no actual
development plan
are

proposed at this time and the
internal circulation
design
at the
Project Site

is unknown,
Mitigation Measure TC
-
1 would not be applicable to the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project.

The
refore,
because there is no development proposed and future development would be subject to CEQA review,
the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to

hazardous design features

beyond those identified in
the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

Impact Analysis

Transportation

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

69 e.

Would the project result in inadequate emergency access?

The 2016 Final SEIR

determined that intersections and driveways providing access to the Project Site

would operate at acceptable levels of service and internal roadways and dr iveways would be
designed in accordance with all City regulations, including those pertaining to emergency access.

Consequently, emergency vehicles would not be subject to unacceptable delays entering or exiting the
Project Site

and impacts associated with

emergency access would be less than significant

for the
Approved Project
.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning
to all L
-
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturb
ing activities and any future development on
the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review
. No
development plans

or circulation
plans are proposed for the
Project Site

and with development plans for the Project

Site,

all internal
roadways
and driveways developed under the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would be designed in accordance with all City regulations, including those pertaining to emergency access.

Consequently, emergency vehicles would not be subject to unacceptable delays en tering or exiting
the
Project Site
. Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to

emergency access

beyond those identified in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

70 This page intentionally left blank.

Impact Analysis

Utilities and Service Systems

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

71 4.17

Utilities and Service Systems

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016 SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
Mo
re Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do
2016 SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Would the project:

Require or result in the
relocation or construction of
new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or
storm water drainage,
electric power, natural gas,
or telecommunications
facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could
cause significant
environmental effects?

Pages 186
-

187

N/A

Comply with the applicable
water purveyor water
conservation
ordinance
requirements for new
development projects?

N/A; New
CEQA
checklist
item added
subsequent
to 2016
SEIR

N/A

Result in a determination by
the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may
serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve
the project’s projected
demand in addition to the
provider’s existing
commitments?

Pages 186
-

187

N/A

Generate solid waste in
excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the
capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise
impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?

Page

187

N/A

Comply with federal, state,
and local management and
reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid
waste?

Page
187

N/A

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

72 a.

Would the project
require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause

significant
environmental effects?

The 2016 Final SEIR determined describes how existing
wastewater infrastructure and treatment
facilities
, and storm drain facilities have the capacity to accommodate the Approved Project.

Therefore, impacts would be less

than significant for the Approved Project. However, the 2016 Final SEIR did not analyze impacts to
electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities .

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of

the
entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. Th
e Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

In
2016 the City of Camarillo City
Council adopted
Ordinance 1126 which

amends chapter 14.12 of the Camarillo Municipal Code to require

the preparation of a Water Service Impact Study and demonstrates the proposed
development

will not create additional demand on the city's water system. Although there is n o
development associated with the proposed Project, as applications for development are submitted to the City, the
City

will review historic water usage and
the Water Service Impact Study
, to
determine if offset water demand will be required.

The Proposed
Land Use Reversion Project would
not induce demand for new or increased utility services and therefore impacts related to new utilities would be less than significant.

Comply with the applicable water purveyor water conservation ordinance requirements for new
development projects
?

This impact was not analyzed in the 2016
Final SEIR
.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88 -
acre
Project Site

to Industrial
(Research and Development) and zoning to all L
-
M (Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the
development of up to 5
25,000
SF

(75 percent) of light industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of
office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the Project Site

would be sub
ject to project
level CEQA review and applicable water

applicable water purveyor water conservation ordinance
requirements
. Therefore, impacts related to
water purveyor water conservation ordinance
requirements for new development projects

would be less th
an significant.

Would the project r
esult in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitme
nts?

The 2016 Final SEIR describes how
the Camarillo Sanitary District provides sewer service to the project area. Sewage from the
Project Site

vicinity is conveyed via sewer infrastructure to the
Camarillo Wastewater Treatment Plant (C
WTP). The
2016 Final

SEIR
concluded that the CWTP had
adequate capacity to treat the wastewater that would be generated by the industrial project. It also stated that the wastewater would continue to be treated in accordance with the treatment requirements of the Los Angeles
Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Therefore, the 2016 Final
SEIR concluded that the potential impact of the Approved Project on wastewater infrastructure and treatment facilities was determined to be less than significant.

Impact Analysis

Utilities and Service Systems

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

73 The Proposed Land Use Reversi
on Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Development) and zoning to all L -
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of ligh
t
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

The

Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

As such, the CWTP woul
d
have capacity to
provide sewer service to future development under the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project.

Additionally, future
CWTP capacity will be analyzed during project level CEQA review for future development on the
Project Site
. Therefore, the
Pr
oposed Land Use Reversion Project would not
result in new or more severe impacts related to

wastewater treatment

beyond those identified in
the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess o f the
capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?

Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?

The 2016 Final S
EIR

describes how the City of Camarillo has an Exclusive Agreement with E.J.

Harrison & Sons trash company for regular day
-
to
-
day refuse service. Refuse from the Approved
Project would also be subject to this agreement as the
Project Site

is within the Cit
y of Camarillo.

All
solid
-
waste
-
generating activities within the City of Camarillo is subject to the requirements set forth in AB 939, which requires each city and county to divert 50 percent of its solid waste from landfill disposal through source reducti
on, recycling, and composting. The City of Camarillo has been diverting approximately 75% of its total solid waste from landfills.

The 2016 Final SEIR

concluded
that landfills serving the City of Camarillo have adequate capacity to accommodate the total so lid
waste generation of the Approved Project and impacts would be less than significant.

The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project involves the reversion of the land use designation of the entire 46.88
-
acre
Project Site

to Industrial (Research and Developme
nt) and zoning to all L
-
M
(Limited Manufacturing) to allow for the development of up to 525,000 SF

(75 percent) of light
industrial uses and 175,000
SF

(25 percent) of office uses. The Proposed Land Use Reversion Project does not include any development or

ground disturbing activities and any future development on the
Project Site

would be subject to project level CEQA review.

The

Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

located on the same
Project Site

as the Approved Project

and
Project Site

conditions are
the same as when was analyzed in the 2016 Final SEIR.

As such, E.J. Harrison & Sons would provide
refuse service to future development under the Proposed Land Use Reversion Project.

Additionally,
l
andfill capacity will be analyzed during project level CEQA review for future development on the Project Site
.

Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to

solid waste

beyond those identified
in the 201
6 Final SEIR
.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

74 This page intentionally left blank.

Impact Analysis

Wildf
ire

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

75 4.18

Wildfire

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the 2016
SEIR?

Do Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the 2016
SEIR?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the 2016 SEIR?

Any New
Informa
tion
Resulting in
New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do 2016 SEIR
Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

If located in or near areas or lands classified in the City of Camarillo’s General Plan Safety Element as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:

Substantially impair an
adopted emergency
evacuation plan?

Page 177 ends

N/A

Due to slope, prevailing
winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks and
thereby expose project
occupants to pollutant
concentrations from a
wildfire or the uncontrolled
spread of a wildfire?

Page 177 ends

N/A

Require the installation or
maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads,
fuel breaks, emergency water
sources, power
lines or other
utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in
temporary or ongoing
impacts to the environment?

Page 177 ends

N/A

Expose people or structures
to significant risks, including
downslopes or downstream
flooding or landslide
s, as a
result of runoff, post
-
fire
slope instability, or drainage
changes?

Page 177 ends

N/A

If located in or near areas or lands classified in the City of Camarillo’s General Plan Safety Element as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the
project:

Would the project s
ubstantially impair an adopted emergency evacuation plan?

Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,

would the project

exacerbate wildfire risks
and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from

a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

76 c.

Would the project r
equire the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire r
isk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?

Would the project e
xpose people or structures to significant risks, including downslopes or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -
fire slope instability,

or drainage
changes?

The 2016 Final SEIR predates the updates to the
CEQA Guidelines

requiring the evaluation of
potential impacts related to wildfire; therefore, the 2016 Final SEIR does not directly address the stand alone
CEQA Guidelines
Appendix G wil
dfire thresholds. A discussion of wildfire/wildland
hazards is included in Section 5g,
Impacts Found
to

Be Less Than Significant
, of the 2016 Final SEIR.

The 2016 Final SEIR states the
Project Site

is located within a developed area and there are no
adjace
nt wildlands

for the Approved Project
.

The potential for impacts related to wildfire risk were known prior to adoption of the 2016 Final SEIR. The
Project Site

not

located in a very high fire hazard severity zone as classified in the City of Camarillo’s

General Plan Safety Element. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

does not include
any development and would not directly or directly exacerbate fire risk or expose project occupants to fire hazard related risks. Any future development on the Project S
ite

would be subject to project
level CEQA review

including fire hazard impacts
. The
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would
not result in any new or substantially more severe impacts related to wildfire beyond those identified in the 2016 Final SEIR.

Impact Analysis

Mandatory Findings of Significance

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

77 4.19

Mandatory Findings of Significance

Where was
Impact
Analyzed in
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do
Proposed
Changes
Require
Major
Revisions to
the
2016
SEIR
?

Do New
Circumstances
Require Major
Revisions to
the
2016 SEIR
?

Any New
Information
Resulting in
New or
Substantial
ly
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?

Do
2016 SEIR

Mitigation
Measures
Address
and/or
Resolve
Impacts?

Does the project have the
potential to substantially
degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish
or
wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to
drop below self
-
sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal
community, substantially
reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate
import
ant examples of the
major periods of California
history or prehistory?

N/A

Yes

Does the project have
impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively
considerable?
("Cumulatively
considerable" means that
the incremental effects of a
projec
t are considerable
when viewed in connection
with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the
effects of probable future
projects)?

N/A

Does the project have
environmental effects which
will cause
substantial
adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or
indirectly?

N/A

Yes

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

78 a.

Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self
-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examp
les of the major periods of California history or prehistory?

Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?

Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?

This section was not included in the 2016 Final SEIR
however based on the analysis provided in the
document it can be determined that there are no new circumstances that require major revisions to the 2016

Final

SEIR and ther
e is no new information resulting in new or substantially more sever e

significant impacts.

As described above in Sections 3.1 thr
ough 3.
18 , the

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would
result in

new or more severe direct or indirect impacts beyond thos e identified in the previously
adopted
2016 F
inal

SEIR

for the
Approved

Project
.

Upon review of new development projects and
infrastructure projects that have occurred within the vicinity of the Project Site since the certification of the
2016 Final SEIR
,
n
o new reasonably foreseeable future projects have been
identified within proximity to the
Project Site

that were not previously considered in the cumulative
impacts analysis in the adopted Final
2016
F
inal
SEIR
.

Therefore, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion
Project

would have no new or more severe impacts in terms of its potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self
-
susta
ining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory
; have

po
tential
ly significant

cumulative
impacts;
or have
environmental effects causing
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.

Additionally, when
development projects are proposed in the Project Site,
Mitigation measures from the adopted 2016
F
inal

SEIR
would be reduced to consider

reduc
tion of

ROC and NOx emissions

(as described in
Section 3.
3 ,
Air Quality
, of this Addendum)
, red
uc
tion of

impacts to biological resources (as
described in Section 3.4
Biological Resources

of this Addendum),
reduction of impacts to
protect
archaeological resources and human remains (as described in section 3.5 Cultural Resources and
Tribal Cultural Re
sources

of this Addendum),

and protect paleontological resources (as described in
section 3.7
Geology and Soil

of this Addendum). Overall implementation of these mitigation measures would
help prevent environmental effects causing substantial adverse effec ts on human
beings.

Conclusion

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

79 5

Conclusion

As established in the
analysis
above regarding the potential
environmental
effects
that may be
generated as compared to the
Approved
Pro
ject, it is concluded that

substantial changes are not
proposed to the
Approved
Project nor have substantial changes occurred that would require major revisions to the
adopted
2016 F
inal

SEIR

prepared for the Original Project. Impacts beyond those identifi
ed and analyzed in the
adopted
2016 F
inal

SEIR

would not be expected to occur as a result of
the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
. Overall, the proposed modifications to the Original
Project that constitute the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would
result in
no
new
impact or
mitigation
information of substantial importance that would

generate
new, more severe impacts or
require
new mitigation measures

compared to those

identified for the Original Project in the
adopted Final
2016 F
inal

SEIR
.

Therefore,
the City of Camarillo
concludes that the analyses conducted and the conclusions reached and the mitigation measures adopted
in the
2016 F
inal

SEIR
,

adopted

on
September
28, 2016

by the
Camarillo City Council
, remain valid. As such, the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

would not
result in conditions identified in
State CEQA Guidelines

Section 15162

requiring
Subsequent

environmental review or a Subsequent EIR
, and these

are therefore
not required for the
Proposed
Land Use Reversion
Project.

It can be emphasized

that the
Proposed Land Use Reversion Project
would
remain s
ubject to all previously
adopted
mitigation measures
included in
the
adopted Final
2016 SEIR

for the
Ap
proved
Project.

The M
itigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program

adopted for
the
Approved
Project on
September 28, 2016
,

would
remain
applicable to the
Proposed Land Use
Reversion Project
.

Based on the above analysis, this Addendum to the previously adopted
2016

F
inal

SEIR

for the project
has been prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA
Guidelines
.

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

80 This page left intentionally blank.

References

Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

81 6

References

Camarillo, City of. 2013.

Camarillo General Plan
–

Safety Element
https://cms7files.revize.com/camarilloca/Departments/Community%20Development/Gene ral%20Plan/Safety.
pdf
. Accessed August 2023.

____
_
_. 2006. Camarillo General Plan
–

Open Space and Conservation Element. Accessible at:
https://cms7files.revize.com/camarilloca/Departments/Community%20Development/Gene ral%20Plan/OpenCons.pdf. Acces
sed August 2023
.

______. 2016. Airport North Specific Plan.
https://cms7files.revize.com/camarilloca/Departments/Community%20Development/Appr oved%20Projects/FINAL%20Airport%20North%20Specific%20Plan%20%20UD%2009 -
2016.pdf

Accessed August 2023

______. 201
1 .

Final EIR Tentative Tract 5812, Springville LLC.
https://cms7files.revize.com/camarilloca/Final%20EIR%20Springville.pdf

Accessed August
2023

______. 2016 Final Subsequent EIR Springville Commercial. https://cms7file
s.revize.com/camarilloca/Departments/Community%20Development/Appr oved%20Projects/Springvile%20Commercial%20Prelim%20Final%20SEIR%20June%202016.p df

Accessed August 2023

California Department of Conservation (DOC). 2018. Im
portant Farmland Finder

https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/WilliamsonAct/
. Accessed August 2023

City of Camarillo

Proposed Land Use Reversion Project

82 This page left intentionally blank.

Camarillo City CouncilNovember 8, 2023

Camarillo City Council
November 8, 2023