Cities Index.
Item M - STAFF PRESENTATION CC 2.14.24 Costco Appeal

Camarillo City Council
February 14, 2024

Document
Item M - STAFF PRESENTATION CC 2.14.24 Costco Appeal
Meeting
February 14, 2024
Body
Camarillo City Council
Original file
12.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on camarillo.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

Appeal Public Hearing
Second Subsequent MND, CPD-
226M(5), CUP-422
Costco Wholesale
February 14, 2024

Project Location

SPRINGVILLE DRW VENTURA BL
Site Plan
Staff Recommendation
Floor Plan
Main
Entrance Bakery
Alcohol
Optical &
Hearing
Tire
Center
Pharmacy
Food
Court
Staff Recommendation

Staff Recommendation

Staff Recommendation

Property Background
• September 12, 2007 – Approval of the 499,000-square-foot Paseo Camino Real shopping center. A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was adopted.
• February 15, 2011 – Approval of a modification to accommodate a Lowe’s Home Improvement. An Addendum to the MND was
adopted.
• April 19, 2016 – Approval of a modification for the Amara Shopping Center. A Subsequent MND was adopted.

Costco Project Background
• On December 5, 2023, the Planning Commission adopted Second Subsequent MND 2023-4, CPD- 226M(5) and CUP-422 for the Costco project.
• Two separate appeals were filed by Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER) and Ventura County Citizens Against Mega Gas (VCCAMG).
• The appeal by SAFER was withdrawn on February 12, 2024. • The hearing before the City Council is a de novo hearing. The City Council’s decision is final.

CEQA
• A Second Subsequent MND was prepared for the
Costco project.
• No new significant impacts will occur beyond those
that were evaluated in the adopted MND or
Subsequent MND.

CEQA
Environmental Issues Raised by Appellant:

Ø Fugitive Dust
Ø Energy
Ø Project requires Subsequent EIR
Ø Transportation
Appeal Hearing Procedure
Ø VCCAMG has 15 minutes to present its reasons for Appeal.

Ø Applicant has 15 minutes for a response.

Ø VCCAMG has 5 minutes to rebut.

Ø Public comment.

Ø City Council deliberation and decision.

Staff Recommendation
Recommend the City Council take one of the following actions:

1. Adopt Resolutions denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission’s approval of Second Subsequent MND 2023-4 and CPD- 226M(5)/CUP-422.
or

2. Direct Staff to return with a resolution of project denial with findings indicated by the City Council.
or

3. Request additional information from staff.
14

← All documents from this meeting