Cities Index.
PPT - Policy 4.01 Procurement

Camarillo City Council
January 22, 2025

Document
PPT - Policy 4.01 Procurement
Meeting
January 22, 2025
Body
Camarillo City Council
Original file
1.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on camarillo.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

Policy 4.01 Procurement
January 22, 2025

Timeline
2024 2025
Policy Committee
Meeting #2
October 29, 2024
City Received Final
Report from
Procurement Consultant
February 2024
City Council
Policy Adoption
January 22, 2025
TODAY
Policy Committee
Meeting #1
September 26, 2024

Council Goals and Objectives
3 GOAL: It is the goal of the City Council to maintain
sound and conservative financial practices to
ensure the fiscal sustainability of the City.

OBJECTIVE: Continue to identify and implement
means and methods for streamlining internal and
public-facing City operations.

FISCAL MANAGEMENT

Agencies No Solicitation
(Director Approval)
Informal
(CM Approval)
Formal
(Council Approval)
Agoura Hills Less than $25,000 - More than $25,000
Calabasas Less than $50,000 - More than $50,000
Moorpark Less than $5,000 - More than $5,000
Ojai Less than $5,000 $5,000 to $30,000 More than $30,000 Oxnard Less than $5,000 $5,000 to $100,000 More than $100,000 Santa Paula Less than $5,000 $5,000 to $50,000 More than $50,000 Simi Valley Less than $100,000 - More than $100,000
Thousand Oaks Less than $5,000 $5,000 to $75,000 More than $75,000 Ventura Less than $60,000 - More than $60,000
Camarillo Less than $5,000 $5,000 to $30,000 More than $30,000 Professional Services
The average threshold is $57,000 compared with $30,000 in Camarillo Agencies No Solicitation
(Director Approval)
Informal
(CM Approval)
Formal
(Council Approval)
Agoura Hills Less than $5,000 $5,000 to $25,000 More than $25,000 Calabasas Less than $10,000 $10,000 to $60,000 More than $50,000 Moorpark Less than $1,000 $1,000 to $15,000 More than $5,000 Ojai Less than $5,000 $5,000 to $30,000 More than $30,000 Oxnard Less than $5,000 $5,000 to $100,000 More than $100,000 Santa Paula Less than $5,000 $5,000 to $50,000 More than $50,000 Simi Valley Less than $7,500 $7,500 to $45,000 More than $100,000 Thousand Oaks Less than $5,000 $5,000 to $75,000 More than $75,000 Ventura Less than $5,000 $5,000 to $250,000 More than $60,000 Camarillo Less than $5,000 $5,000 to $30,000 More than $30,000 Supplies, Equipment & Maintenance Services
The average threshold is $68,000 compared with $30,000 in Camarillo Agencies No Solicitation
(Director Approval)
Informal
(CM Approval)
Formal
(Council Approval)
Agoura Hills N/A N/A N/A
Calabasas N/A N/A N/A
Moorpark N/A N/A N/A
Ojai Agreement: Less than $5,000
Task Orders: Less than $5,000
Agreement: $5,000 to $30,000
Task Order: $5,000 to $20,000
Agreement: $30,000 up to $60,000
Task Order: N/A
Oxnard Agreement: Less than $100,000
Task Order: Less than $100,000
Agreement: $100,000 to $200,000
Task Order: $100,000 to $200,000
Agreement: $200,000 +
Task Order: $200,000 +
Santa Paula No Response No Response No Response
Simi Valley Agreement: Less than $7,500
Task Order: N/A
PSA: $7,500 to $100,000
General: $7,500 to $175,000
Task Order: N/A
PSA: $100,000 +
General: $175,000+
Task Order: N/A
Thousand Oaks Agreement: Less than $25,000
PSA Task Order: Less $25,000 (3 quotes)
Maintenance Serv T ask Order: Less than
$25,000 (3 quotes)
Agreement: $25,000 to $75,000
Prof/Consulting Serv. T ask Order:
$25,000 to $75,000 (3 quotes)
Maintenance Serv T ask Order:
$25,000 to $60,000 (3 quotes)
Agreement: More than $75,000
PSA Task Order: $75,000 to $125,000 Cap
(3 quotes)
Maintenance Serv T ask Order: N/A (Cap
Reached)
Ventura N/A N/A N/A
Camarillo Agreement: N/A
Task Order: N/A
Agreement: N/A
Task Order: N/A
Agreement: Up to $60,000
Task Order: Up to $60,000
On-Call Service Contracts
Current thresholds
• Tier 1: $0 - $5k -> Director
• Tier 2: $5k - $30k -> CM
• Tier 3: $30k+ -> Council
New thresholds
• Tier 1: $0 - $10k -> Director
• Tier 2: $10k - $50k -> CM
• Tier 3: $50k+ -> Council
On-Calls are up to $60k and task orders
cannot exceed $60k.

On call agreements are approved by
City Council and all task orders are
currently approved by City Manager
On Call Agreements – No Limit
Task Order threshold
• Tier 1: $0 - $25k -> Director
• Tier 2: $25k - $200k -> CM
• Tier 3: $200k+ -> Council, Formal Solicitation
Supplies, Equipment & Services
On Call Contracts
Purchase of goods threshold:
• Tier 1: $0 - $25k -> Director (no solicitation)
• Tier 2: $25k+ -> CM (informal solicitation)
• Tier 3: $200k+ -> Formal Solicitation
Blanket Purchase Orders
Current Process Recommendation Goal
• On Call Contracts are
contracts without a specific
project scope of work but
rather categorized around
general types of trades.
• Task orders act like a micro
contract within the on -call
contract allowing for on an
as needed basis. The detail
of scope of work, cost and
timeline will be referenced
on this document.

Current thresholds
• Tier 1: $0 - $5k -> Director
• Tier 2: $5k - $30k -> CM
• Tier 3: $30k+ -> Council
• Most contracts are solicited via RFQ
• Brief scope of work
• Vendor selection based on
qualifications only
• All professional services shall be
solicited via an RFP
• No cost consideration
• No follow up with an RFP
• Detailed scope of work
• Contract term and other conditions
• Cost proposal required
• Interview firm for final selection
• Qualified vendor prepares
scope of work
• Scope of work is then
negotiated with City staff
• Cost is negotiated after scope
is agreed upon
• Selection based on:
• Competence
• Qualifications
• Expertise
-------------------------
• Cost
Current Process Recommendation Recommendation
• When uncertain regarding depth of
qualified consultants
• When anticipated a large pool of firms
• When required by Gov Code 4526-4528
• Under specific/specialized circumstances
• Initiate Solicitation via RFQ
• Broad scope of work
• Contract terms and other
conditions
• Create a solicitor’s list based on
qualifications
• When ready to retain a consultant, issue
an RFP to the qualified solicitor’ s list
RFQ and/or RFP RFP RFQ followed by RFP

. Goals of the Update
Align procurement limits with inflationary cost increases.

Implement industry best practices for efficiency.

Provide flexibility while preserving competitive procurement processes. • These RECOMMEDNED changes will enable smoother operations, maintain transparency, and ensure fiscal responsibility moving forward. • I’d like to thank the City manager’s office for their support and department staff for the healthy discussion we led as a team to get us to this point tonight.

Recommendation
Adopt the amendment to City Council Policy 4.01 Procurement 11 Questions

← All documents from this meeting