Cities Index.
Exhibit E_HillmanSewerRatesObjection Without Exhibits

Camarillo City Council
May 14, 2025

Document
Exhibit E_HillmanSewerRatesObjection Without Exhibits
Meeting
May 14, 2025
Body
Camarillo City Council
Original file
339 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on camarillo.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

Objection to Proposed Camarillo Sewer Rates
By Linda G. Hillman
6357 Corte Tunitas, Camarillo, CA 93012
I object to the proposed sewer rates. The rates violate Proposition 218, because the residential rates are fixed, regardless of how much sewage the residence sends for treatment. Small users subsidize big users. The city has not met its burden of showing “that the amount of any contested assessment is proportional to, and no greater than, the benefits conferred on” properties with low sewer use, nor why it is proportional to vary business charges with use and not residential charges.

Prop 218 (California Constitution XIII D) requires,
● “No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel…
● “the burden shall be on the agency to demonstrate … that the amount of any contested assessment is proportional to, and no greater than, the benefits conferred on the property or properties in question.”
Government code 53759.2 says that any court case against the rates will be decided on the evidence submitted to the city, no new evidence.

Camarillo says written objections signed by owners or tenants are due by 5 pm May 12. Hearing is at 5 pm May 14. Submittal locations are Email: [email protected] and In Person:

Camarillo City Clerk, 601 Carmen Drive, Camarillo, CA 93010.

Camarillo charges businesses based on use. It’s fair to charge homes the same way. Everyone can control costs by conserving water. The cities would bill for gallons used, and customers who use less would pay less.

T o avoid charging sewer rates on irrigation water which does not get sewer treatment, some big irrigators in Simi V alley have landscape meters to keep irrigation water off the main meter. The California Model W ater Efficient Landscape ordinance encourages landscape meters for landscapes over 5,000 square feet. 1 Los Angeles City bills all year based on winter water use, when irrigation is low, so extra use for irrigation in drier warmer months does not entail sewer charges. Los Angeles says:
● “ Annually, your average daily sewage volume is calculated for the upcoming year, from July 1 through June 30, based on previous winter's lowest average daily sewage volume. The sewage volume is determined by evaluating the water usage for the premises during the rainy season review period.” Source:
1 23 CCR § 493.2.2(e)(1)
https://govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Document/I359E82E0CF6211EFAEE1BA05241FF137?viewType=FullT ext&origin ationContext=documenttoc&transitionType=CategoryPageItem&contextData=(sc.Default) 1 Exhibit E
www.ladwp.com/account/customer-service/understanding-your-rates/residential-sewer-service-charge San Luis Obispo uses a variation, with a monthly cap based on winter use. San Luis Obispo says: ● “Water usage is tracked from December through February when irrigation systems are likely off.

The

usage

is

averaged

to

determine

the

sewer

cap

applicable

for

the

upcoming

year.”

Source:
https://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/utilities-department/utility-billing/sewer-cap San Francisco assumes 10% for irrigation and lets people apply for a different factor. San Francisco says:

● “A discharge unit shall be based on the customer’s metered water use multiplied by the flow factor

and

represents

the

quantity

of

metered

water

use

returned

to

the

sewage

system

as

wastewater.

By

default,

residential

single-family

customers

are

assumed

to

have

a

flow

factor

of

90%

and

multi-family

residential

customers

are

assumed

to

have

a

flow

factor

of

95%.

Customers

whose

usage

of

water

varies

from

typical

patterns

may

apply

for

an

adjusted

flow

factor.”

Source:
https://www.sfpuc.gov/sites/default/files/accounts-and-services/Rates2024/2024-0625_1044_Rates_Schedule_Water_Sewer_WEB.pdf Camarillo has not met its burden of showing “that the amount of any contested assessment is proportional

to,

and

no

greater

than,

the

benefits

conferred

on”

properties

with

low

sewer

use,

nor

why

it

is

proportional

to

vary

business

charges

with

use

and

not

vary

residential

charges

with

use.

People vary in the water and sewer they use (sources attached): ● Oxnard bills $35.79 per month base rate plus $2.35 per Hundred Cubic feet (HCF). ● Ventura City bills $19 per month base rate plus $4.46 per HCF, to maximum of 12 HCF. ● Santa Barbara City bills $32.74 per month base rate plus $4.96 per HCF to maximum of 8 HCF.
● San Luis Obispo City bills $26.11 per month base rate plus $10.46 per HCF, to maximum based

on

winter

use.
● Los Angeles City bills $5.80 per HCF ● San Diego City bills $15.75 per month base rate plus $5.33 per HCF to maximum of 20 HCF.
● San Francisco bills $5.76 per month base rate plus $18.72 per HCF. Camarillo’s 2025 sewer rate study adds inflation to past rates, at 16% per year, to cover bonds for a new treatment plant. The monthly rate for single-family homes will go from $74 now to $86 in July 2 and $135 in 2028. The study expects it to reach $216 per month in 2033, to replace the old sewer plant.
2 That 2025 study says an earlier 2017 study (which is not posted on the City’s website and was obtained by public records request) covered allocation of costs. It showed different household sizes in

different

building

types,

and

assumed

average

use

was

proportional

to

household

size.

It

set

rates

based

on

average

use,

which

was

169

gallons

per

day

in

single

family

homes.

The

study

did

not

explain

why

the

city

should

not

set

rates

by

use,

as

it

does

for

non-residential,

and

as

the

same
consultant recommended for all customers in Ventura City in 2022. Cotati City says efficient homes use 25-30 gallons per person per day, and Denver recommends 40 (attached). Camarillo’s plan will charge some businesses $6.32 per Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF), plus a base charge.

So

proportional

rates

would

bill

each

family

$6.32

per

HCF

plus

a

base

charge.

The

base

would

be

$43

to

raise

the

same

money

as

the

proposed

flat

rate.

Camarillo sewer rate per month
At 30 gallons per person per day
At current average of 63 gallons per person per day (calculations below) City planned flat rate $86 $86 Average rate in different family sizes if it's based on use: 1 $51 $59 2 $58 $75 3 $66 $91 4 $73 $107 5 $81 $123 6 $89 $139 For sewer customers where Camarillo doesn’t provide the water, the city can ask the water provider for

usage,

as

they

do

with

commercial

customers.

If

the

city

doesn't

get

water

use

data,

the

city

can

(a)

ask

the

customer

to

provide

the

water

bill,

(b)

charge

for

high

usage

if

they

don’t,

and

(c)

every

year

or

two

check

the

meter

and

reconcile

charges.

In 2013 John Bakker, a city attorney for two cities, gave the attached presentation to the League of California Cities and recommended, “Avoid flat-rate and minimum charges unless the use-based 2 2025 Camarillo Sewer Rate study p.4 shows 16% rise per year through 2031, then 6% camarillo.primegov.com/api/compilemeetingattachmenthistory/historyattachment/?historyId=7e717bd1-5f0e-49d3-a 5b8-a5f0f74203fc Notice mailed, though with wrong phone number cityofcamarillo.org/hot_topics/utility_rates.php 3 justification is explained in detail.”
3 Bakker has extensive experience as an attorney for cities and special

districts.

Camarillo’s 2017 sewer rate study in 2017 (attached) cites the manual, Financing and Charges for Wastewater,

for

their

methodology.

The

2005

and

2018

editions
4 have

the

same

messages:
● “It is common practice to use metered water data to estimate customer-contributed residential

wastewater

volume

units

of

service

for

the

majority

of

customer

classes.”

2004-p.129
● “In recognition of the often significant amount of water used by residential customers for lawn

irrigation,

car

washing,

or

other

purposes

not

discharge

to

the

wastewater

system,

it

is

generally

reasonable,

for

allocation

purposes,

to

estimate

contributed

residential

wastewater

volumes

based

on

winter

usage

(where

irrigation

is

generally

limited

to

summer

months)

or

as

a

representative

percentage

of

total

annual

use

(where

irrigation

is

year-round).”

2004-p.129
● “Service units under the design basis include volume, capacity (peak wastewater volume), strength

(suspended

solids,

BOD,

and

TKN),

and

customer

billing

units.”

2004-p.134
● “under the functional-cost allocation methodology. Under this approach… capacity is not used

as

a

cost

determinant.

Volume,

strength,

and

the

customer

units

of

service

are

determined

in

the

same

manner

as

described

above

for

the

design-basis

methodology.”

2004-p.136
● “Cost-of-service studies are important as guides for determining the necessity for and level of

rate

adjustments

to

be

considered

in

recovering

costs

equitably

from

wastewater

system

customers.

The

importance

of

such

studies

is

that

they

make

policymakers

aware

of

all

factors

contributing

to

the

costs

incurred

in

providing

service

to

various

system

customers.

When

practical

or

policy

matters

dictate

deviation

from

cost

of

service,

decision-makers

can

be

apprised

of

the

dollar

effects

of

deviation.”

2004-p.142
● “Notably, cost-of-service rates are the standard for determination of rate equity.” 2018-p.60,

2005-p.145
● “Comparisons… provide information on the magnitude and direction of subsidies across customer

classes.”

2018-p.60,

2005-p.145
● “the use of fixed charges exclusively is steadily declining and being replaced by rate schedules

that

combine

fixed

charges

with

a

volume

rate.”

2018-p.61,

2005-p.146
● “The primary disadvantages of revenue recovery largely through fixed charges are potential inequities

in

the

distribution

of

cost

responsibilities

and

lack

of

affordability

for

4 2004 version of manual Financing and Charges for Wastewater Systems (27) (Manual of Practice ) https://search.worldcat.org/search?q=+0071453040&offset=1 2018

version:

Financing

and

Charges

for

Wastewater

Systems

(27)

(Manual

of

Practice)
,

4th

ed.

by

Water

Environment

Federation.
https://search.worldcat.org/search?q=9781572783478&offset=1

3 https://www.cacities.org/UploadedFiles/LeagueInternet/95/9511e374-8da9-4aa5-96dd-807988485fd1.pdf 4 small-volume users… Payment for quantities or services not received is contrary to cost-of-service

principles.”

2018-p.61,

2005-p.147
● “winter averaging. Under this approach, a customer’s wastewater billable units are determined

by

calculating

the

mean,

or

average,

of

the

customer’s

metered

water

consumption

during

a

designated

series

of

months…

when

outdoor

watering

is

at

a

minimum…

The

customer

is

then

billed

their

unique

winter

average

for

each

month

during

the

subsequent

year.”

2018-p.62
● “Average winter water use is generally considered to provide the most accurate estimation.” 2005-p.149
● “Uniform volume rates by customer class provide a mechanism… achieving cost recovery either

through

a

combination

of

a

customer

charge

and

volumetric

rate,

or

simply

by

a

single

rate-per-unit

of

billable

flow.”

2005-p.153
● “in many communities, a shift in revenue recovery from fixed charges to variable rates has been

made

to

support

water

conservation

objectives

or

simply

enhance

ratepayers’

control

of

wastewater

bills.”

2018-p.64,

2005-p.160
● “To the extent that these policy approaches result in inter- or intraclass subsidies, it is important

to

be

able

to

quantify

these

transfers.”

2005-p.161
● “If the current rate structure is a flat rate structure (i.e., the bill is fixed and does not vary with

level-of-service

use),

then

moving

to

a

(water

use)

volume-based

approach

could

assist

with

affordability.

The

reason

is

that

if

the

structure

is

volume-based,

a

customer

is

better

able

to

control

the

bill

by

altering

the

level

of

use.”

2018-p.89,

2005-p.224
I verify that the statements here and the attachments are accurate to the best of my information and

belief.

__________________________________________, record owner, dated: 5/12/2025 Linda G. Hillman, record owner 6357 Corte Tunitas Camarillo, CA 93012 Attachments Ventura City current rates https://www.cityofventura.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/40640/2024-25-Rates Oxnard rates since 2021 https://www.oxnard.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Wastewater-Rate-Sheet.pdf Santa Barbara City rates santabarbaraca.gov/sites/default/files/2022-06/FY23%20Sewer%20Rate%20and%20Fee%20Schedule.pdf 5 San Luis Obispo City rates slocity.org/government/department-directory/utilities-department/utility-billing/water-and-sewer-rates San Luis Obispo sewer cap slocity.org/government/department-directory/utilities-department/utility-billing/sewer-cap Los Angeles City rates https://sanitation.lacity.gov/san/faces/home/portal/s-lsh-au/s-lsh-au-r/s-lsh-au-r-b?_adf.ctrl-state=vp1fcvlh4_5&_afrLoop=15944878649373412#! Los Angeles City explanation of billing based on winter water use www.ladwp.com/account/customer-service/understanding-your-rates/residential-sewer-service-charge San Diego City rates https://www.sandiego.gov/public-utilities/customer-support/sewer-billing-rates San Francisco rates are on page 13 (p.26 of pdf) in https://www.sfpuc.gov/sites/default/files/accounts-and-services/Rates2024/2024-0625_1044_Rates_Schedule_Water_Sewer_WEB.pdf Cotati City FAQ on residential use https://www.cotaticity.gov/FAQ.aspx?QID=89 Denver City/County recommendations on residential use https://www.denverwater.org/residential/efficiency-tip/how-efficient-are-you-indoors Attorney John Bakker’s advice in 2013 to CA League of Cities is on p.18 in cacities.org/UploadedFiles/LeagueInternet/95/9511e374-8da9-4aa5-96dd-807988485fd1.pdf Attorney John Bakker’s bio https://www.redwoodpubliclaw.com/john-d-bakker Camarillo 2017 sewer rate study by Raftelis (not publicly posted by city, obtained by public records request)
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25876235-camarillo-2017-wastewater-rate-study/ Ventura 2021 sewer rate study by Raftelis cityofventura.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/26850/2021-Cost-of-Service-and-Rate-Design-Study-Report 6

← All documents from this meeting