Camarillo City Council
May 28, 2025

If you have any comments or questions, please call Sandy Leatherman at (714) 444-9199.

Sincerely,

BONTERRA CONSULTING
Ann M. Johnston Sandra Leatherman
Principal, Biological Services Senior Biologist
R: P;o;ects`,RBF,J320',Companson Anaiysis LV-120902.v;pd Addendum EIR
Springville Drive (Formerly Airport North)/Route 101 Interchange

ATTACHMENT F

CALTRANS CORRESPONDENCE
10-102315 Page -18- December 2002
State of California Business Transportation and Housing Agency Memorandum
To: Aaron Burton Date: October 8, 2002
Associate Environmental Planner
File: 07-VEN-101
KP 25.57/28.56
(PM 15.89/17.75)
U.S. 101/Springville
Drive Interchange
EA 191600
From: Claudia Harbert
Associate Architectural Historian
Subject: Review of Draft Addendum EIR
After receiving the additional information I requested from the consultant, I have completed my review of the Draft Addendum EIR.

In my preliminary review, I stated that the original EIR should have been sent to SHPO for review, but noted that there was no mention of this in the document. The consultant supplied me with a Document Details Report from the State Clearinghouse that proved the report had been submitted to SHP() in May of 1999. SHP0 had no comments and approval of the document was therefore assumed. I also expressed concern in my preliminary review that the proposed modifications to the project had not been reviewed by a qualified cultural resources specialist. Upon comparison of the approved and revised concept plans, I agree that the original HRCR includes the areas that will be impacted by the revised plan. It is my opinion that the original HRCR and the Addendum EIR are sufficient and comply with the relevant environmental laws as they pertain to cultural resources.

If you have any questions regarding this assessment, please contact me at 7-0415. Thank you.

Addendum EIR
Springville Drive Formerly Airport North)/Route 101 Interchange

ATTACHMENT G

AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT
10-102315 Page -19- December 2002

CONSULTING

CARBON MONOXIDE MICROSCALE ANALYSIS
AND
PM10QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
for the
Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Addendum EIR
City of Camarillo
County of Ventura, State of California
Prepared For:

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-DISTRICT 07
120 South Spring Street
Los Angeles, California 90012-3606
Contact: Ms. Cherylann L. Henderson
Associate Environmental Planner
213/897-9095
Consultant:

RBF CONSULTING
14725 Alton Parkway
Irvine, California 92618
Contact: Mr. Bruce R. Grove Jr., REA
Project Manager, Environmental Services
949/855-3686
December 6, 2002
JN 10-102315

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......... ....... . ....... ........ . ..... 1

1.1 Purpose of the Proposed Project 1

1.2 Project Description 1

2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 6

2.1 Climate 6

2.2 Air Quality Management 6

3.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ......... ......... ......................................... ...... ..... 7

3.1 Federal Clean Air Act 7

3.2 California Clean Air Act 7

3.3 1997 Air Quality Management Plan 7

3.4 Valley Fever 8

4.0 MONITORED AIR QUALITY 8

5.0 CARBON MONOXIDE MICROSCALE ANALYSIS ..... .......... ....... ........ . .......... 10

5.1 Carbon Monoxide Standards 10

5.2 Carbon Monoxide Protocol 11

5.3 "CALINE4" Carbon Monoxide Hotspot Modeling 11

5.4 Analysis Results 14

6.0 PM-T o QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS ............. ...... ......... ....... . ............. ....... ..... ..... 15

7.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS RELATED TO AIR QUALITY .......... ................. ............. 16

8.0 REFERENCES ................ ..... ............. .......... .................................... ........ ................. 16 APPENDIX A — PROTOCOL DATA SHEETS — CONSTRUCTION

LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1 — Regional Vicinity 3
Exhibit 2 — Project Vicinity 4
Exhibit 3 — Revised Concept Plan 5
Exhibit 4 — Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Receptor Locations 13

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 — Local Air Quality Levels 9
Table 2 — Federal and State Carbon Monoxide Standards 10 Table 3 — Existing Carbon Monoxide Standards 12
Table 4— Future (2025) Projections of Carbon Monoxide Concentrations With Project 15 Table 5 — PM10Measurements at the El Rio-Rio Mesa School #2 Monitoring Station 16 RBF CONSULTING Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Improvements

CITY OF CAMARILLO

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Camarillo proposes the development of a new freeway interchange at Springville Drive and the State Route 101 (SR-101), which includes new ramp construction, roadway widening and traffic signal improvements. The project is located in a mixed-use area within the City of Camarillo (refer to Exhibit 1 — Regional Vicinity). The surrounding area consists of the Camarillo Airport to the south (separated by the Camarillo Hills Drain) and agricultural land to the north, south, east, and west, respectively.

The proposed Project lies within the Oxnard Plain Airshed, a sub-basin of the South Central Coast Air Basin (SCCAB), which is under jurisdiction of Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The VCAPCD sets and enforces air pollutant regulations for stationary sources in the SCCAB while CARB is charged with controlling motor vehicle emissions. The Oxnard Plain Airshed includes Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo Counties.

1.1 Purpose of the Proposed Project
The purpose of the proposed project is to improve traffic operations and to accommodate projected 20-year increases in traffic volumes from the future development Springville Drive.

The increased traffic volumes in conjunction with the lack of an interchange at Springville, are expected to result in the deterioration of operation conditions at intersections in the project area.

In addition, traffic demand in the project vicinity is expected to increase as a result of future development. Without the proposed construction, numerous intersections within the project vicinity will not operate at satisfactory levels. This project is needed to respond these projected increases in regional and local traffic demand on the state and local roadway systems.

The proposed work is consistent with work identified in the Project Report (PR) prepared by Caltrans, dated March 2000, and is also consistent with all major planning studies for Ventura County, Caltrans, and the City of Camarillo.

1.2 Project Description
The proposed Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange is located in the City of Camarillo approximately halfway between the existing Las Posas Road interchange to the east and Central Avenue to the west (refer to Exhibit 2 — Site Vicinity). The existing Route 101 freeway mainline consists of three (3) 3.6 meter (m) (12') lanes and 3.0 m (10') outside shoulders, 1.5 m (5') inside shoulders and a variable width unpaved median.

Springville Drive (formerly known as Airport North Road) is proposed to accommodate two (2)

3.6 m (12') through travel lanes in each direction of travel, a 8.4 m (28') raised median, a 2.4 m (8') shoulder on each side and 1.8 m (6') sidewalks along both sides of the street.

Revised Design Concept
Improvements within Caltrans Right-of-Way
The currently proposed improvements are minor realignments of Route 101 northbound, southbound on-ramp and off-ramps. The northbound Springville Drive/Route 101 intersection will be relocated approximately 20 m north of the EIR approved alignment to accommodate adequate superelevation transition runoff lengths pursuant to the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. The southbound Route 101/Springville Drive intersection will be moved approximately 20 m south of the EIR approved alignment to accommodate adequate superelevation transition runoff lengths pursuant to the Caltrans Highway Design Manual (refer to Exhibit 3 — Revised Page -1- December 6, 2002
RBF CONSULTING Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Improvements

CITY OF CAMARILLO
Concept Plan). The infield area enclosed by Route 101 and the northbound on-ramp and offramp will potentially be used as detention basins. Project components are as follows:

1. Springville Drive northbound on-ramp and off-ramp intersection will be moved approximately 20 m (66') north to provide increased superelevation transition runoff lengths along the ramps and adequate left turn pocket storage lengths.

2. Springville Drive southbound on-ramp and off-ramp intersection will be moved approximately 20 m (66') south to provide increased superelevation transition runoff lengths along the ramps and adequate left turn pocket storage lengths.

Improvements within City of Camarillo

1. Realignment of Springville Drive and Ventura Boulevard intersection to the south of previously evaluated location to immediately north of the Camarillo Hills Drive.

Subsequently the Ventura Boulevard alignment east of Bajo Agua Avenue and west of its current alignment is relocated to the south (approximately 20 m) to meet the new terminus of Springville Drive.

2. MPD F-000-5 (Master Plan of Drainage Facility) will be added east of Springville Drive.

III. PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
The Project Report for the Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange project was approved by the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) on March 17, 2000. All documentation and analysis within the Project Report (PR) addressed the ultimate construction of the interchange and an approach to staged implementation. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified on June 23, 1999, for the Route 101/Airport North Area Interchange and Annexation No. 83 (SCH No. 1999031099).

The previous EIR indicated no long-term adverse impacts to air quality, however site preparation and construction activities may increase the level of exposure risk associated with Valley Fever to construction personnel. Potential short-term construction emissions and Valley Fever impacts remain similar for the proposed interchange modifications to those addressed in the 1999 EIR.

Page -2- December 6, 2002
Pyramid
Lake LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
SANTA

BARBARA
COUNTY
KERN
COUNTY

SAN LUIS
OBISPO
COUNTY
Lebec
Gorman

VENTURA
COUNTY
Cas alc
Carpinteria
Fillmore
Chatsworth
Canoga
Park
Hidden
Hills
Agoura Hills - Woodland
Hills
Regional Vicinity not to scale
• • •
CONSULTING 86/02 JN 10-102315-9503
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Oil
ueidideouo3 pasykeu
-
oui B.iaI :aamos
11 "
g , ;•.°P• I I fi;
:IY4'11Ast alet" ""ra
L
6111,11-X 6071411841
AVIAIN/11 STRICT
RBF CONSULTING Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Improvements

CITY OF CAMARILLO

2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

2.1 Climate
The project area is characterized by cool winters and moderate, dry summers tempered by cooling sea breezes. Summer, spring and fall weather is generally a result of the movement and intensity of the semi-permanent high pressure area located several hundred miles to the west. Marine influences generally predominate during this period and cause afternoon on-shore flow and evening offshore flow. Winter weather is generally a result of the size and location of low-pressure weather systems originating in the northern Pacific Ocean.

Ventura County winds are dominated by a diurnal land-sea breeze cycle. This cycle is broken only by occasional winter storms and Santa Ana winds from the northeast. The sea breeze is generally stronger than the land breeze and results in a net flow from west to east. Westerly sea breezes carry pollutants generated in the coastal areas into the inland valleys where dispersion is restricted. The presence of temperature inversions and westerly transport result in meteorological conditions conducive to ozone formation in the inland valleys. Plentiful sunshine provides the energy to create photochemical pollutants such as ozone, and the westerly wind patterns tend to transport pollutants from offshore and coastal sources into Camarillo, where dispersal is limited due to surrounding topography. Inversion conditions are associated with degraded air quality as the surface air is prevented from rising and dissipating air pollutants that accumulate throughout the day. A second inversion type forms on clear, winter nights when cold air off the mountains sinks to the valley floor while the air aloft the valet remains warm. This forms radiation inversions. These inversions, in conjunction with calm winds, trap pollutants, such as automobile and heavy equipment exhaust emissions, near their source. These nocturnal radiation inversions are very intense throughout the area and create very limited mixing potential at night, especially during the cooler months of the year. In particular, Camarillo experiences restricted vertical mixing caused by temperature inversions and transport of pollutants from the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) via Santa Susana Pass.

2.2 Air Quality Management
Ambient air quality is described in terms of compliance with Federal and State standards.

Ambient air quality standards are the levels of air pollutant concentration considered safe to protect the public health and welfare. They are designed to protect people most sensitive to respiratory distress, such as asthmatics, the elderly, very young children, people already weakened by other disease or illness, and persons engaged in strenuous work or exercise.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) were established by the U.S. Environ-mental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1971 for six air pollutants. States have the option of adding other pollutants, to require more stringent compliance, or to include different exposure periods.

California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) for pollutants and NAAQS are included in Table 1, Local Air Quality Levels.

The CARB is required to designate areas of the State as attainment, non-attainment, or unclassified for any State standard. An "attainment" designation for an area signifies that pollutant concentrations did not violate the standard for that pollutant in that area. A "nonattainment" designation indicates that a pollutant concentration violated the standard at least once, excluding those occasions when a violation was caused by an exceptional event, as defined in the criteria. An "unclassified" designation signifies that data do not support either an attainment or non-attainment status.

The Ventura County portion of the SCCAB is divided into ozone attainment and non-attainment areas. The ozone attainment area consists of the northern half of the County (north of the southern border of Los Padres National Forest), while the ozone non-attainment area consists of the southern half of the County (south of the border of the Los Padres National Forest). The Page -6- December 6, 2002
RBF CONSULTING Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Improvements

CITY OF CAMARILLO
non-attainment area is divided into the Ojai Valley Airshed and the Oxnard Plain Airshed. At the present time, the Oxnard Airshed is in violation of the PK°standard.

3.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

3.1 Federal Clean Air Act
The 1970 Clean Air Act (CAA) authorized the establishment of the NAAQS, and set deadlines for their attainment. The Federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 made major changes in deadlines for attaining NAAQS and in the actions required of areas of the nation that exceeded these standards.

3.2 California Clean Air Act
The 1988 California Clean Air Act (CCAA) requires that all air districts in the State endeavor to achieve and maintain CAAQS for 03, CO, SO2, and NO2by the earliest practical date. The CCAA specifies that districts focus particular attention on reducing the emissions from transportation and area-wide emission sources. The Act also gives districts new authority to regulate indirect sources. Each district plan is to achieve a five percent annual reduction (averaged over consecutive three-year periods) in district-wide emissions of each nonattainment pollutant or its precursors.

3.3 1997 Air Quality Management Plan
The VCAPCD has prepared multiple Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs), which are comprehensive planning documents to guide the APCD, County, and other local agencies on progress toward attainment of the 03standard. The most recent AQMP was published in 1997.

To accomplish its task, the AQMP relies on a multi-level partnership of governmental agencies at the Federal, State, regional and local level. These agencies, which include EPA, CARB, local governments, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and the SCAQMD, are the cornerstones that implement the AQMP programs.

The 1979 AQMP was the first comprehensive air quality planning effort in Ventura County. This plan predicted attainment of the federal 03standard by 1987. A subsequent Plan, the 1982 AQMP, was a refinement of the 1979 Plan. This plan acknowledged that attainment of the federal 03standard would not occur by the required 1987 deadline, and that further planning efforts were necessary. The 1987 AQMP was adopted in July 1988. Although the 1987 AQMP provided for emission reductions beyond the 1 982 AQMP, the 1987 Plan did not demOnstrate attainment of the federal 03standard at any time in the foreseeable future.

The purpose of the 1994 AQMP was to satisfy the long-range planning requirements of the 1990 Federal CAA amendments and to outline a strategy for meeting the Federal 03clean air standard by 2005, while accommodating a reasonable and inevitable amount of growth. The requirements addressed by the 1994 AQMP were: 1) attainment of the Federal 03standard by 2005; 2) a post-1996 Rate-of-Progress demonstration; 3) contingency measures; 4) an updated 1990 baseline emission inventory; and 5) a revised 1990-1996 Rate-of-Progress emission reduction calculations which would decrease despite increases in vehicle use. The 1994 AQMP also satisfied the requirements of the CCAA to submit a triennial progress report and revisions to the 1991 AQMP by the end of 1994.

The 1995 AQMP Revision approved in December 1995, was prepared to update information presented in the 1994 AQMP to reflect changes that have occurred since the original Plan was adopted on November 8, 1994. These changes include: 1) actions taken by the CARB in November 1994 to approve additional control strategies for inclusion in the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Federal 03 standard; 2) rejection by the GARB of the Page -7- December 6, 2002
RBF CONSULTING Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Improvements

CITY OF CAMARILLO
District's request for a centralized motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program for Ventura County; 3) promulgation of the EPA Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) on February 14, 1995, and its later rescission as part of a Department of Defense appropriations bill on April 11, 1995; and 4) significant changes to the photochemical modeling by CARB and District staff to comply with EPA and GARB modeling guidance, correct model inputs and reflect updated future year emission forecasts.

Based on the emission control strategy proposal in the 1995 Revision, the District will be able to attain the Federal 03standard by 2005, as mandated by the Federal CAA. However, the District will need to adopt and implement additional emission control strategies to attain California's more stringent health-based ambient 03standard. The 1994 AQMP and 1995 AQMP Revisions do not specifically address attainment of the State PM10standard. However, many of the control measures contained in the AQMPs would result in substantial reductions in PM10emissions.

The 1997 AQMP Revision extended adoption and implementation dates for nine Alternative 2 control measures identified in the 1995 AQMP Revision. Alternative 2 control measures were those measures proposed for adoption after the date the 1995 AQMP Revision was adopted.

Alternative 1 measures were measures that had already been adopted by the APCD Board.

3.4 Valley Fever
San Joaquin Valley Fever (Coccidioidomycoses) is a disease caused by the inhalation of spores of the fungus, Coccidioides immitis. The disease is endemic to the semiarid regions of the southwestern United States, and occurs in the Camarillo area at a relatively low level of risk.

Transmission of Valley Fever is primarily caused by naturally occurring winds and dust storms, and secondarily by dust-creating activities on undeveloped soils, earth moveing (land development) and other man-made dust raising activities. The rate of infection in Ventura County is low compared to that of Kern County and other areas of the southwestern states.

Nevertheless, a small percentage of these cases may prove fatal. Residents of areas in which valley fever occurs often acquire a lifelong immunity to the disease. However, field workers (such as archaeologists, biologists, and surveyors) and construction workers are commonly at risk because of their exposure to soil dust containing spores. Where symptoms occur after exposure, an initial influenza-like respiration condition is evident. The majority of such cases recover with bed rest. Less than 0.2 percent of all cases progress to a stage including other areas of the body, including meningitis and other serious disorders. At this stage, however, mortality rates of infected individuals increase to 50-90 percent over a period of years.

4.0 MONITORED AIR QUALITY
The Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) operates nine ambient air quality monitoring stations throughout the SCCAB. The closest station and most representative of the air quality of the project site is the El Rio Mesa School #2 Monitoring Station, located at 545 Central Avenue. This station monitors 03, CO, NO2, S02, PM10and PM25The data collected at the El Rio Station is considered representative of the air quality experienced on-site.

Concentrations of SO2registered in Ventura County have not exceeded state or federal standards in recent years and lead is no longer monitored in Ventura County. Air quality data from 1997 to 2001 for the El Rio Monitoring Station is provided in Table 1, Local Air Quality Levels. The following air quality information briefly describes the various types of pollutants.

Carbon Monoxide (CO). Carbon monoxide is a colorless and odorless gas. The automobile and other types of motor vehicles are the main source of this pollutant. CO concentrations are generally higher along roadways especially in the early mornings, late evening and winters. The State standard of CO is 9.0 ppm (parts per million), averaged over eight hours. The maximum eight-hour concentration at the El Rio Monitoring Station has fluctuated from 1.2 to 2.03 ppm Page -8- December 6, 2002
RBF CONSULTING Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Improvements

CITY OF CAMARILLO
between 1997 and 2001. The CO State and Federal standard was not exceeded between 1997 and 2001.

Table 1

LOCAL AIR QUALITY LEVELS
(Measured at the El Rio Mesa School #2 Station Ambient Air Monitoring Station) Pollutant California
Standard Primary
Standard
Year
Federal Maximum State l
Concentration
# of Days
Std.

Exceeded
# of Days
Federal
Std.

Exceeded
CAAQS/
NAAQS
Attainment
Status
Carbon
Monoxide 35 ppm
for 1 hour
35 ppm
for 1 hour
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001

1.5 1.7

1.9 2.3

1.6 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 YES/YES
Carbon
Monoxide

9.0 ppm
for 8
hours

9. 0 ppm
for 8 hours
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001

1.89 2.03

1.20 1.28

1.64 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 YES/YES
Ozone 0.09 ppm
for 1 hour

0.12 ppm
for 1 hour
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001

0.102

0.106

0.103

0.084

0.094
2 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NO/NO
Nitrogen
Dioxide 0.25 ppm
for 1 hour

0.053 ppm
annual
average
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001

0.082

0.088

0.099

0.074

0.068
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

YES/YES
Sulfur Dioxide 0.25 ppm
for 1 hour

0.14 ppm for
24 hours
1997
1998 1999
2000
2001

0.011

0.012

0.006

0.009

0.009
0 0
0 0
0 00000
F

YES/YES
Particulate
Matter (PM,o)
50 ug/m3
for 24
hours
150 14/m3
for 24 hours
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
252.5

70.3 50.8

52.2 51.5
3 1
1 1
2 1
0 0
0 0
NO/YES
.,
Fine
Particulate
Matter (PM,o) NA
65 ligim3
for 24 hours
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
NA
NA

36.7 45.7

41.0 NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0 0
0 NA/NA
Source: Data obtained from the California Air Resources Board Summary of Air Quality Data, 1997 to 2001. ppm = Parts per million
p.g/m3= micrograms per cubic meter
NM = not measured
NA = not applicable
NOTES:

1. Maximum concentration is measured over the same period as the California Standard.

2. Monitoring Station located at 545 Central Avenue, El Rio, California 93030.

Ozone (031.Ozone, a colorless gas with a sharp odor, is one of a number of substances called photochemical oxidants (highly reactive secondary pollutant). These oxidants are formed when hydrocarbons, NO and related compounds, interact in the presence of ultraviolet sunlight. 03 is a particular concern because of its high concentrations in Camarillo relative to the levels at Page -9- December 6, 2002
RBF CONSULTING Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Improvements

CITY OF CAM ARILLO
which adverse health effects are known to occur. All stations monitoring 03in Ventura County have experienced exceedances of the State 03standard. The 03concentrations monitored at the El Rio Station from 1997 to 2001 exceeded the State one-hour standard (0.09 ppm) between 1997 and 1999. The maximum 03concentration dropped from 0.102 ppm in 1997 to

0.094 in 2001.

Nitrogen Oxides (N0x). There are a number of NO compounds, but only two significantly affect ambient air quality. These include oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) NO2is itself a regulated pollutant, but it also reacts with hydrocarbons in the presence of sunlight to form 03 and other compounds that make up photochemical smog. NO2is a reddish-brown gas with an odor similar to bleach, and is the by-product of fuel combustion which results from mobile and stationary sources. Seasonal and diurnal patterns in NO2concentration vary widely between locations, and levels have fluctuated at the El Rio Station. The maximum NO2concentration dropped from 0.082 in 1997 to 0.068 in 2001. The State standard of 0.25 ppm (1-hour average) was not exceeded from 1997 to 2001.

Particulate Matter (TSP, PM1d)
Atmospheric particulates are made up of liquids or fine solids, such as soot, dust, aerosols, fumes, and mists. Particulates can form by natural processes, such as wind blown dust and dirt, wildfires, and salt from sea spray; they can also arise from human activities such as construction, demolition, quarrying, and agricultural operations. In addition, particulates may be emitted directly from automobiles and industrial sources, or may be created in the atmosphere by the photochemical process. A large portion of the total suspended particulate matter (TSP) in the atmosphere is finer than 10 microns (PM10). PM10tends to lodge deeply in lung tissue and is therefore considered more of a health hazard than larger particles with which the body's natural defenses deal with more readily. As a result, both State and Federal standards have been set for PM10. The State 24-hour standard for PM10is 50 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3). PK()concentrations monitored at the El Rio Station indicate that PK()decreased from 252.5 ppm in 1997 to 51.5 ppm in 2001. The State 24-hour standard was exceeded between 1 to 3 days from 1997 to 2001.

5.0 CARBON MONOXIDE MICROSCALE ANALYSIS

5.1 Carbon Monoxide Standards
Local air quality is a major concern along roadways. Carbon Monoxide (CO) is a primary pollutant, and unlike ozone, is directly emitted from a variety of sources. For this reasOn, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network, and are used as an indicator of its impacts upon the local air quality. Comparisons of levels with State and Federal CO standards indicate the severity of the existing concentrations for receptors in the project area. The Federal and State standards for CO are presented in Table 2, Federal and State Carbon Monoxide Standards.

Table 2

FEDERAL AND STATE CARBON MONOXIDE STANDARDS
Averaging Time CO Standard
Federal 1 Hour 35 ppm
8 Hour 9 ppm
State 1 Hour 20 ppm
8 Hour 9 ppm
Source: California Air Resources Board, ADAM Data Summaries.

Page -10- December 6, 2002
RBF CONSULTING Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Improvements

CITY OF CAM ARILLO

5.2 Carbon Monoxide Protocol
A mobile emission analysis for the proposed Build Alternatives was conducted according to the Transportation Proiect-Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol (Protocol), developed by the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Davis (December 1997). The Protocol is organized into the following three sections:

1. Providing a framework and roadmap for conducting a federal conformity determination at the project level as well as the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

2. Providing a procedure for conducting a "screening analysis" of local impacts of intersections.

3. Providing a guidance for conducting a more "detailed analysis" required when a project does not pass the screening analysis, and is for use in conjunction with programs such as CT-EMFAC and CALINE4.

Protocol applies to all projects subject to NEPA and projects that may not require a conformity determination under federal conformity rules, but may still require approval under CEQA.

Protocol applies specifically Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)/Federal Transit Administration (FTA) transportation projects.

An affirmative regional conformity determination must be made before a project may proceed.

This requirement is satisfied if the project is included in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and if the project has not been altered in design concept or scope as described in the RTP and TIP. Exceptions to these criteria are projects in areas designated as attainment for all transportation related criteria pollutants; however these projects may still require a CEQA finding for regional air quality impacts. In addition, all projects (except those exempt) are subject to local CO review.

For the purpose of this Protocol, a regionally significant transportation project is one that is defined as regionally significant in accordance with 40 CFR 93.101 and with any locally adopted extensions to this definition. A project exempt from regional emission analysis is not subject to a regional conformity determination. However, it is still subject to a local CO impact review.

The proposed project is included in the 1998/99 — 04/05 federally approved Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). Additionally, the project is consistent with the City of Camarillo Circulation Element. Although the project is not identified in the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Program (RTP), it is consistent with the goals and objectives identified in the Ventura County Congestion Management Program (CMP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

Due to the relatively close proximity of sensitive receptors a detailed analysis utilizing the CALINE4 CO prediction software has been completed. Results of the analysis are provided in Section 5.4.

5.3 "CALINE4" Carbon Monoxide Hotspot Modeling
Carbon monoxide levels in the project vicinity due to nearby roadways were assessed with the CALINE4 computer model. CALINE4 is a fourth generation line source air quality model developed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) ("CALINE4," Report No.

FHWA/CATTL-84/15, November 1984). The purpose of the model is to assess air quality impacts near transportation facilities in what is known as the microscale region. The microscale region encompasses the region of a few miles around the pollutant source. Given source strength, meteorology, site geometry, and site characteristics, the model can reliably predict pollutant concentrations. The precise methodology used in modeling existing air quality with the Page -11- December 6, 2002
RBF CONSULTING Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Improvements

CITY OF CAMARILLO
Protocol and CALINE4 computer model is discussed in more detail in Section 5.4, Analysis Results. The remainder of this section discusses the resulting existing CO levels in comparison to the State and Federal CO standards.

The CALINE4 modeling was conducted for along Ponderosa Road, Springville Drive and the Route 101 Northbound on-ramp and off-ramp. A total of eight (8) receptors were modeled, primarily along Ponderosa Road (refer to Exhibit 4, Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Receptor Locations).

The existing background CO concentrations were estimated using the highest CO monitoring data for the last three (3) years. The nearest available CO data was obtained from the El Rio Mesa School #2 Station. The existing background 1-hour CO concentration is estimated to be at

3.7 parts per million (ppm), and will be added to the worst-case meteorological projections to account for background CO levels'. The modeling results of the CO levels are presented in Table 3, Existing Carbon Monoxide Concentrations, below.

Table 3

EXISTING CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS
Receptor Location 1-Hour CO Concentration
(PPrn)
8-Hour CO Concentration
(ppm)
1 3.8 ppm 2.3 ppm
2 3.7 2.2
3 3.7 2.2
4 4.0 2.4
5 4.0 2.4
6 4.1 2.5
7 4.0 2.4
8 4.0 2.4
Notes:

1. As measured at a distance of 50 feet from the corner of the intersection predicting the highest value. CO values include modeled background concentrations of 3.7 ppm for 1-hour. Eight-hour concentrations are based on a persistence factor of

0.6 of the 1-hour concentration for Rural and Urban locations as specified in Table B.15 of the Protocol.

Table 3 presents the modeling results for CO concentrations at the receptor site. The results show that the existing CO concentrations at these receptor locations are currently below the 1- hour and 8-hour State and Federal standards. Therefore, the existing CO levels are currently in compliance with both state and federal standards.
l Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines, Section 6.4.2 - Detailed Procedure for Carbon Monoxide Analysis, November 2000.

Page -12- December 6, 2002
LLI _J
<
Li
tri
0 H
0 Z
RBF CONSULTING Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Improvements

CITY OF CAM ARILLO

5.4 Analysis Results
Carbon Monoxide (CO) is the pollutant of major concern along roadways since the most notable source of CO is vehicles. For this reason CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by the roadway network, and are used as an indicator of its impacts upon local air quality. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing future CO levels with State and Federal CO standards. The State and Federal standards for CO are depicted in Table 2, Federal and State Carbon Monoxide Standards.

Future CO concentrations with the project were forecast utilizing the CALINE4 computer model.

CALINE4 is a fourth generation line source dispersion air quality model developed by Caltrans ("CALINE4", Report No. FHWA/CA/TL-84/15, June 1989). The purpose of the model is to forecast air quality impacts near transportation facilities in what is known as a microscale region.

The microscale region encompasses the area of a few thousand feet around the pollutant source. Given source strength, meteorology, site geometry, and site characteristics, the model can reliably predict pollutant concentrations.

For this model, worst-case meteorology was assessed. Specifically, a late afternoon winter period with a ground-based inversion was considered. For worst-case meteorological conditions, a wind speed of 0.5 meters per second (1 mph) and a stability class G was utilized for a 1-hour averaging time. Stability class G is the worst-case scenario in terms of the most turbulent atmospheric conditions. A "worst case" wind direction (sigma theta) of ten degrees from parallel on the highest roadway volume link was assumed since parallel winds result in the highest CO concentrations at receptors located along the roadway. The temperature used for worst case was 40 degrees Fahrenheit. The temperature affects the dispersion pattern and emission rates of the motor vehicles. The temperature represents the January mean minimum temperature as reported by Caltrans. The wind speed, stability class, sigma theta, and temperature used for the modeling are those recommended in the "Development of Worst Case Meteorological Criteria" (Caltrans, June 1989). A mixing height of 1,000 m was used, as recommended by the CALINE4 model. A surface roughness of 10 centimeters (cm) was utilized and is based on the CALINE4 Manual. It should be noted that the results are also determined based on the worst case LOS of the roadways. Composite emission factors utilized with the CALINE4 computer were derived from the Protocol. The CALINE4 CO modeling was based on the peak hour traffic data, in this case the a.m. peak hour data.

Eight-hour CO levels were projected using the Caltrans methodology described in the Protocol.

The method places a persistence factor, which is multiplied against the 1-hour emission rates.

The projected 8-hour ambient concentrations are then added to the product. The persi-stence factor can be estimated using the highest ratio of 8-hour to 1-hour second annual maximum concentrations from the most recent three years that data are available. The data and the results of the CALINE4 modeling are also provided in appendices.

Generally, the 1-hour CO level is considered the peak maximum CO level since it is the highest CO measured within an hour increment. Changes in meteorology and traffic over time disperse the CO concentration levels and cause it to be less severe. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that the 1-hour CO levels would persist for a full eight hours. As a result, the 1-hour data is generally considered peak level, and is higher that the 8-hour CO level.

The future ambient (background) concentrations are not available. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that the background CO levels for the year 2025 are the same as year 2002. This can be considered the conservative worst-case scenario, since the background CO levels are expected to decrease steadily in the future years. The pollutant levels in 1-hour and 8-hour concentrations are expressed in terms of parts per million (ppm). The CO levels reported in the following table is a composite of the background levels of CO coming into the area plus those generated by the local roadways.

Page -14- December 6, 2002
RBF CONSULTING Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Improvements

CITY OF CAMARILLO
Table 4
FUTURE (2025) PROJECTIONS OF CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS

WITH PROJECT
Receptor Location 1-Hour CO Concentration
(PPrn)
8-Hour CO Concentration
(ppm)
1 3.8 ppm 2,3 ppm
2 3.7 2.2
3 3.7 2.3
4 3.8 2.3
5 3.8 2.3
6 3.8 2.3
7 3.8 2.3
8 3.8 2.3
Notes:

1. As measured at a distance of 50 feet from the corner of the intersection predicting the highest value. CO values include modeled background concentrations of 3.7 ppm for 1-hour. Eight-hour concentrations are based on a persistence factor of

0.6 of the 1-hour concentration for Rural and Urban locations as specified in Table B.15 of the Protocol.

The potential for CO hotspots primarily exists in areas where there are high ambient CO levels, where existing or projected levels of service are at LOS D or worse (creating long vehicle idle times), or where the intersection has high peak hour traffic volumes. Although the project does not contribute to future intersection traffic volumes, a formal CALINE4 hotspot analysis was conducted consistent with the Protocol for the link segments adjacent to the affected receptors.

The CALINE4 modeling predicts a Year 2025 maximum 1-hour CO concentration of 3.8 ppm.

These worst-case levels are well below the State and Federal standards of 20 ppm and 35 ppm respectively. Maximum Year 2025 8-hour CO concentration with the project has a CO concentration of 2.3 ppm, which is well below the State and Federal standard of 9 ppm.

Therefore, the proposed project will not result in adverse CO emissions.

6.0 PfVlio QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
The following PM,, qualitative analysis was conducted in accordance with the Guidance for Qualitative Project Level Hot Spot Analysis in PM,, Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas published by the Federal Highway Administration Office of Natural Environment, September 2001.

Currently, the project is located in an attainment area for PM10. As CO levels have consistently improved over the years, PK() has shown little change. Therefore, PK() is becoming more of a concern along busy roadways. Areas of most concern are where high levels of traffic operate under heavily congested conditions, where snow removal routinely occurs, or where unusually large number of diesel-powered vehicles can be expected to occur. None of these conditions occurs in the project area. The nearest air monitoring station (El Rio-Rio Mesa School #2) has not shown an exceedance of the Federal PK() standard for the last three years (1999 through 2001). Fugitive dust from potential future demolition, grading, remediation, and construction is expected to be short-term and would cease following project completion. Most of this material is inert silicates, rather than the complex organic particulates released from combustion sources, which are more harmful to health. Dust (larger than 10 microns) generated by such activities usually becomes more of a local nuisance than a serious health problem. The amount of PK() (particulate matter smaller than 10 microns) generated as a part of fugitive dust emissions is of particular concern to health.

Page -15- December 6, 2002
RBF CONSULTING Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Improvements

CITY OF CAMARILLO
The PM10monitoring station nearest the project site is at El Rio-Rio Mesa School #2. The Air Quality Summary for the station from 1999-2001 is provided in Table 5, below. The following is a summary of Caltrans/University of California, Davis (UCD) studies pertaining to PM10violation:

If no violations have been recorded in the project vicinity by air district monitors, and the monitored concentrations are not close to the NAAQS (meaning within about 80 to 90 percent of the NAAQS concentration threshold), Caltrans/UCD studies strongly suggest that no PA/110 hots pot can occur as a result of a typical project.

Table 5
PM10MEASUREMENTS AT THE EL RIO-RIO MESA SCHOOL #2 MONITORING STATION PM10 Statistics 1999 2000 2001
Annual PM10 High 50.8 52.2 51.5
Table 5 indicates that PK()has not exceeded the Federal standard of 150 ug/m. Two prevailing factors support the assertion that future PK()violations as a result of the project is unlikely. The 2000 and 2001 average exhibits declining ambient levels and the data is not within the 80-90% threshold stated in the Caltrans/UCD studies, suggesting that no PM10 "hotspot" can occur.

7.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS RELATED TO AIR QUALITY
Cumulative projects include local development as well as general growth within the project area.

However, as with most development, the greatest source of emissions is from mobile sources, which travel well out the local area. Therefore, from an air quality standpoint, the cumulative analysis would extend beyond any local projects and when wind patterns are considered, would cover an even larger area. Accordingly, the cumulative analysis for a project's air quality analysis must be regional by nature.

The project area is in attainment for CO. Construction and operation of cumulative projects will further degrade the local air quality, as well as the air quality of the SCCAB. Air quality will be temporarily degraded during construction activities that occur separately or simultaneously.

However, the greatest cumulative impact on the quality of regional air will be the incremental addition of pollutants mainly from increased traffic from residential, commercial, and industrial development and the use of heavy equipment and trucks associated with the construction of these projects.

Due to the project's relatively small scale, the contribution to the cumulative air emissions is not "cumulatively considerable".

8.0 REFERENCES

1. 2001 Los Angeles and Ventura Street Guide and Directory. The Thomas Guide 2001.

2. California Air Resources Board, 1997 — 2001, Air Pollution Data Monitoring Cards (1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001).

California Air Resources Board, California Surface Wind Climatology, June 1984, Reprinted February 1994.

4. California Department of Transportation — District 7, Springville Drive (Formerly Airport North)/Route 101 Interchange Draft Addendum Environmental Impact Report, June 18, 2002.

Page -16- December 6, 2002
RBF CONSULTING Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange Improvements

CITY OF CAMARILLO

5. South Coast Air Quality Management District, 1980, A Climatological/Air Quality Profile, California South Coast Air Basin, Prepared by Ralph W. Keith.

6. South Coast Air Quality Management Agency, 1991, Final 1991 Air Quality Management Plan, South Coast Air Basin, July 1991.

7. South Coast Air Quality Management Agency, 1994, Final 1994 Air Quality Management Plan, South Coast Air Basin, April 1994.

8. South Coast Air Quality Management District, 1993, Rules and Regulations, January 1993.

9. South Coast Air Quality Management District, SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993.

10. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, 1997, Final Ventura County 1997 Air Quality Management Plan Revision, October 1997.

11. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, 1995, 1995 Ventura County Air Quality Management Plan, July 1995.

12. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, 2000, Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines, November 2000.

Page -17- December 6, 2002

APPENDIX
A. Model Data
Parenthetical CALINE4 Assumptions
for All Building Phases:

Springville Drive/Route 101 Interchange
12/2/02
Job Parameters:

Traffic Study Scenario Conditions
Existing Current conditions.

Future Year 2025
Alternative 1
Year 2025 conditions, Preferred Alternative 1
Run Type: Worst Case Wind Angle (all models)
(Best general choice per CALINE4 model handbook)
Aerodynamic Roughness Coefficient: Rural
Model Information:

Link/Receptor Geometry Units: All dimensions measured in English Units (all models) Averaging Interval: Calculated at 1-hour average CO concentration to give clearer representative view of peak events.

Link Geometry:

Link Name: See each respective model.

Link Type: All links are assumed to be"at grade" indicating that no roadways are elevated or depressed (all models). Springville Drive overpass was modeled as a bridge segment.

X and Y Endpoints: See each respective model.

Link Height: See each respective model.

Mixing Zone Width: This is based on the sum of the width of all through-lanes plus 3 meters on either side (see table below).

Roadway Link Mixing Zone Width
Ponderosa 54 feet
74 feet
54 feet
Springville Drive
Route 101 On-ramp and off-ramp
Existing
Ponderosa
Alternative 1
54 feet
Link Activity:

Traffic Volume (VPH) Hour 1: Corresponding peak hour intersection traffic volume was extrapolated by adding the peak hour turning movements attributable to the end-of-turn roadway of travel. (refer to model output sheets for corresponding traffic levels and emission factors).

Run Conditions:

Wind Speed: 0.5 Meters/Second (all models)
Wind Direction: 0 (all models)
Wind Direction Standard Deviation: 20 degrees (all models) Atmospheric Stability Class: G (7) (all models)
Mixing Height (meters): 1,000 meters (all models)
Ambient Temperature: Winter 4.4 Celsius (all models).

Ambient Pollutant Concentration (ppm): 3.7 ppm (all models) Title : South Central Coast Air Basin Avg 2025 January Default Title Version : Emfac2002 V2.2 Sept 23 2002
Run Date : 12/02/02 15:57:10
Scen Year: 2025-- Model Years: 1980 to 2025
Season : January
Area : South Central Coast AB
***************************************************************************************** Year:2025 -- Model Years 1980 to 2025 Inclusive -- January Emfac2002 Emission Factors: V2.2 Sept 23 2002
South Central Coast A Basin Average Basin Average
Table 1: Running Exhaust Emissions (grams/mile)
Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide Temperature: 40F
Speed

MPH LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL
5 1.139 2.182 2.646 4.967 23.142 28.681 2.012
10 1.028 1.942 2.288 3.380 15.220 24.192 1.717
15 0.934 1.743 2.015 2.416 10.592 21.250 1.501
20 0.851 1.576 1.801 1.814 7.798 19.404 1.336
25 0.780 1.435 1.628 1.430 6.073 18.411 1.207
30 0.717 1.316 1.486 1.184 5.003 18.170 1.106
35 0.662 1.214 1.370 1.029 4.359 18.695 1.026
40 0.614 1.127 1.274 0.939 4.016 20.119 0.964
45 0.572 1.053 1.196 0.901 3.914 22.735 0.921
50 0.535 0.990 1.134 0.907 4.033 27.079 0.898
55 0.502 0.939 1.090 0.960 4.394 34.103 0.898
60 0.474 0.898 1.064 1.069 5.062 45.504 0.930
65 0.450 0.869 1.061 1.251 6.167 64.382 1.012
C4$.0UT
CALINE4: CALIFORNIA LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL
JUNE 1989 VERSION
PAGE 1
JOB: Springville Drive/Route 101 2025
RUN: Hour 1 (WORST CASE ANGLE)
POLLUTANT: Carbon Monoxide
I. SITE VARIABLES
.5 M/S
BRG= WORST CASE
CLAS= 7 (G)
MIXH= 1000. M
SIGTH= 20. DEGREES
ZO= 100. CM ALT= O. (M)
VD= .0 CM/S
VS= .0 CM/S
AMB= 3.7 PPM
TEMP= 40.0 DEGREE (C)
II. LINK VARIABLES
LINK * LINK COORDINATES
DESCRIPTION * X1 Y1 X2
(M)
Y2
*
* TYPE VPH
EF
(G/MI) (M) (M)
A. Link A 6276 1715 6101 1715 AG 110 .9 .0 16.2
B. Link 6101 1715 5917 1714 AG 110 2.0 .0 16.2
C. Link 5917 1714 5819 1717 AG 410 2.0 .0 16.2
D. Link 5819 1717 5690 1713 AG 410 .9 .0 16.2
E. Link 5690 1713 5471 1653 AG 410 .9 .0 16.2
F. Link 5471 1653 5328 1658 AG 410 .9 .0 16.2
G. Link 5328 1658 5313 1486 BG 410 .9 6.0 22.5
H. Link 5313 1486 5276 1142 BG 790 .9 6.0 22.5
I. Link 6278 1705 6107 1707 AG 310 .9 .0 16.2
J. Link 6107 1707 5919 1708 AG 310 2.0 .0 16.2
K. Link 5919 1708 5820 1707 AG 390 2.0 .0 16.2
L. Link 5820 1707 5696 1704 AG 390 .9 .0 16.2
M. Link 5696 1704 5475 1642 AG 390 .9 .0 16.2
N. Link 5475 1642 5344 1642 AG 390 .9 .0 16.2

0. Link 0 5344 1642 5319 1486 BG 390 .9 6.0 22.5
P. Link 5319 1486 5284 1144 BG 420 .9 6.0 22.5
Q. Link 5756 1340 5315 1485 AG 390 1.0 6.0 16.2
R. Link 5315 1485 4949 1436 AG 320 1.0 6.0 16.2
00 CALINE4:

JOB:

RUN:

CALIFORNIA LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL
JUNE 1989 VERSION
PAGE 2
Springville Drive/Route 101 2025
Hour 1 (WORST CASE ANGLE)

C4$. OUT
POLLUTANT: Carbon Monoxide
III. RECEPTOR LOCATIONS

RECEPTOR

COORDINATES
X
(M)

1. Recpt 1 * 5271 1616 1.8

2. Recpt 2 * 5297 1740 17.7

3. Recpt 3 * 5432 1749 17.7

4. Recpt 4 * 5677 1731 1.8

5. Recpt 5 * 5745 1736 1.8

6. Recpt 6 * 5812 1736 1.8

7. Recpt 7 * 5896 1736 1.8

8. Recpt 8 * 5959 1734 1.8
IV. MODEL RESULTS (WORST CASE WIND ANGLE )
* * PRED * CONC/LINK
* BRG * CONC * (PPM)
RECEPTOR * (DEG) : (PPM) : B A CDEF GH
*

1. Recpt 1 * 77. * 3.8 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

2. Recpt 2 * 174. * 3.7 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

3. Recpt 3 * 204. * 3.7 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

4. Recpt 4 * 100. 3.8 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

5. Recpt 5 * 103. * 3.8 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

6. Recpt 6 * 113. * 3.8 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

7. Recpt 7 * 244. * 3.8 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

8. Recpt 8 * 253. * 3.8 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
on
CALINE4: CALIFORNIA LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL
JUNE 1989 VERSION
PAGE 3
JOB: Springville Drive/Route 101 2025
RUN: Hour 1 (WORST CASE ANGLE)
POLLUTANT: Carbon monoxide
IV. MODEL RESULTS (WORST CASE WIND ANGLE) (CONT.)
* CONC/LINK
* (PPM)
RECEPTOR *IJ
*

K L MNOPQR

1. Recpt 1 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

2. Recpt 2 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

3. Recpt 3 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

4. Recpt 4 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

5. Recpt 5 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

6. Recpt 6 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

C4$.0UT

7. Recpt 7 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

8. Recpt 8 * .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
on

Title : South Central Coast Air Basin Avg 2002 January Default Title Version : Emfac2002 V2.2 Sept 23 2002
Run Date: 12/02/02 13:31:52
Scen Year: 2002 -- Model Years: 1965 to 2002
Season : January
Area : South Central Coast AB
***************************************************************************************** Year:2002 -- Model Years 1965 to 2002 Inclusive-- January Emfac2002 Emission Factors: V2.2 Sept 23 2002
South Central Coast A Basin Average Basin Average
Table 1: Running Exhaust Emissions (grams/mile)
Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide Temperature: 40F
Speed

MPH LDA LDT MDT HDT UBUS MCY ALL
5 12.294 18.443 17.921 66.205 123.025 59.424 17.872
10 10.178 14.884 13.805 44.245 81.549 48.773 14.029
15 8.674 12.433 11.124 31.207 57.140 42.145 11.483
20 7.574 10.700 9.323 23.228 42.320 38.338 9.739
25 6.755 9.455 8.090 18.244 33.129 36.714 8.521
30 6.142 8.563 7.247 15.120 27.410 37.014 7.668
35 5.689 7.944 6.692 13.223 23.969 39.288 7.088
40 5.372 7.553 6.371 12.203 22.152 43.910 6.733
45 5.180 7.377 6.265 11.885 21.636 51.681 6.584
50 5.119 7.427 6.384 12.216 22.333 64.062 6.654
55 5.207 7.745 6.772 13.255 24.362 83.637 6.986
60 5.492 8.423 7.521 15.182 28.086 115.012 7.673
65 6.056 9.622 8.802 18.361 34.218 166.583 8.886
C4$.0UT
CALINE4: CALIFORNIA LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL
JUNE 1989 VERSION
PAGE 1
JOB:

RUN:

POLLUTANT:

Springville Drive/Route 101 Existing
Hour 1 (WORST CASE ANGLE)
Carbon monoxide
I. SITE VARIABLES
u= .5 M/S
BRG= WORST CASE
CLAS= 7 (G)
MIXH= 1000. M
SIGTH= 20. DEGREES
ZO= 100. CM ALT= O. (M)
VD= .0 CM/S
VS= .0 CM/S
AMB= 3.7 PPM
TEMP= 40.0 DEGREE (C)
II. LINK VARIABLES
LINK * LINK
DESCRIPTION * X1
*

COORDINATES (M)
Y1 X2 Y2 * TYPE VPH
EF
(G/MI)
A. Link A
B. Link B
C. Link c
D. Link D
E. Link E
F. Link F
G. Link G
H. Link H
• 6276 1715 6101 1715 * AG
• 6101 1715 5917 1714 * AG
• 5917 1714 5819 1717 * AG
• 5819 1717 5690 1713 * AG
• 6278 1705 6107 1707 * AG
• 6107 1707 5919 1708 * AG
• 5919 1708 5820 1707 * AG
• 5820 1707 5696 1704 * AG
61 61
61 61
221
221
221
221

7.0 17.9

17.9 7.0

7.0 17.9

17.9 7.0
.o
.o
.o
.o
.o

16.2 16.2

16.2 16.2

16.2 16.2

16.2 16.2
III. RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
COORDINATES (m)

RECEPTOR X
Recpt 1 5271 1616 1.8
Recpt 2 5297 1740 17.7
Recpt 3 5432 1749 17.7
Recpt 4 5677 1731 1.8
Recpt 5 5745 1736 1.8
Recpt 6 5812 1736 1.8
Recpt 7 5896 1736 1.8
Recpt 8 5959 1734 1.8

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.
00 cALINE4: CALIFORNIA LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL

c4$ .OUT
JUNE 1989 VERSION
PAGE 2
JOB: Springville Drive/Route 101 Existing
RUN: Hour 1 (WORST CASE ANGLE)
POLLUTANT: Carbon Monoxide

IV, MODEL

RECEPTOR

1. Recpt 1

2. Recpt 2

3. Recpt 3

4. Recpt 4

5. Recpt 5

6. Recpt 6

7. Recpt 7

8. Recpt 8
*

RESULTS
*
* BRG
* (DEG)
* 79.
* 359.
* 359.
* 97.
* 102.
* 105.
107.
112.
(WORST CASE WIND ANGLE
* PRED *
* CONC *
* 3.8 * .0 .0
* 3.7 * .0 .0
* 3.7 * .0 .0
* 4.0 * .0 .0
* 4.0 * .0 .0
* 4.1 * .0 .0
* 4.0 * .0 .0
* 4.0 * .0 .0
: (PPM) *ABCDEFGH
)
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0

CONC/LINK
(PPM)
.0 .0
.0 .0
.0 .0
.0 .0
.0 .0
.0 .0
.0 .0
.0 .0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.1
.2
.2
.0
.0
.0
.0
.1
.1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
00

ARD tiomellEAQD Home
2-7)
Site Map Contact Us
View this
page for
another
pollutant:

Start Over:

Data
Statistics
Home
Top 4 Daily PM10 Measurements Page 1 of 1
Highest 4 Daily PM10 Measurements Ariel
and Annual PM10 Statistics
at El Rio-Rio Mesa School #2
micrograms per cubic meter
1999 2000 2001
High Aug 04 50.8 Aug 16 52.2 Oct 22 51.5
2nd High Oct 27 48.3 Jun 05 46.1 Nov 03 51.3
3rd High Mar 31 45.2 Mar 31 44.6 Nov 09 49.5
4th High Oct 15 44.1 Mar 13 41.9 Sep 28 48.7
Measured:
*Days > State Standard 1 1 2
*Days > Nat'l Standard 0 0 0
Calculated:
*Days > State Standard 6.0 6.0 12.0
*Days > Nat'l Standard 0.0 0.0 0.0
***State Annual Average 25 25 25
***Nat'l Annual Average
**3-Year Nat'l Average
• ****Year Coverage 95 100 100
Racktttard a Year
Make a New Request
* Measured days are those days that an actual measurement was greater than the level of the state daily standard (50 micrograms per cubic meter) or the national daily standard (150 micrograms per cubic meter).

Measurements are typically collected every six days. Calculated days are the estimated number of days that a measurement would have been greater than the level of the standard had measurements been collected every day. The number of days above the standard is not necessarily the number of violations of the standard for the year.
** The 3-year statistics include data from the listed year and the two years before the listed year.
*** The state annual average is a geometric mean of all measurements. The national annual average is an arithmetic average of the 4 arithmetic quarterly averages.
*' Year Coverage indicates how extensive monitoring was during the time of year when high pollutant concentrations are expected. Year coverage ranges from 0 to 100. For example, a Year Coverage of 75 indicates that monitoring occurred 75% of the time when high pollutant concentrations are expected. For the current year, Year Coverage will be 0 at the beginning of the year and will increase as the data for the year become available. Year Coverage is blank when the data history at the site is insufficient to determine when high concentrations are expected. http://www.arb.ca.gov,tadam/cgi-bin/db2www/adamtop4.d2wfBranch 12/4/2002 1 Kristina Toan
From: Arleen Ruiz <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 12:35 PM
To: Kristina Toan
Subject: RE: Public Records Request - APN 23002025
External Email
Hello Kristina,
For us to be able to look up your request we would need an existing address not an APN#.

Thanks
Arleen
From: Kristina Toan <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2022 4:31 PM
To: Engineering mailbox <[email protected]>
Subject: Public Records Request - APN 23002025
Hello Sir,
Please see attached Public Records Request for APN 23002025 which is currently a vacant lot northeast of West Ventura Boulevard and Springville Drive, Camarillo, California 93010. Also attached is the parcel map for your reference.

Regards,
Kristina Toan
Project Controls Specialist III
2280 Market Street, Suite 300
Riverside, CA 92501
O 951) 801-3714
F 951) 682-4495
C 714) 269-9817








 











!"# $$%&!

'




()*

)

!"#
++,-.-/0++ 1231232451 1536736166
89:;< =:< ++,-.-/0++ ++,-.-/0++ ++,-.-/0++ 6>111616?@

ABCDEFB GEHIEHDJIJKBLHMDDBNNHLEA OBCP DELIMDIN IBDOLJDMCHNQPPERI







 











!"# $$%&!

'




()*

)

!"#
++,-.-/0++ 1231232451 1536736166 89:;< =:< ++,-.-/0++ ++,-.-/0++ ++,-.-/0++ 6>111616?@

ABCDEFB GEHIEHDJIJKBLHMDDBNNHLEA OBCP DELIMDIN IBDOLJDMCHNQPPERI
 


 







 !" # $% "&"!'( )*



 





 









 





 






Announcements Logged in as: Lindsey Dandridge-Perry Collections (0) 'M Cart (0) Account Management Logout Home Building Code Compliance Fire Planning Public Works HHVC more vDashboard My Records My Account Advanced Search Parcel Details
Addresses
Showing 0-0 of 0
Parcel Number I Owner I Address
No records found.

Owners
Showing 1-1 of 1
1 Name
SPRINGVILLE CAMARILLO 0 LLC 9950 JEFFERSON BL CULVER CITY CA 90232-2781 Genealogy History
Showing 1-1 of 1
Date Description Children Parents
2300020250
01/01/2018 SPLIT 2300020260 Split from 2300020230
2300020270
Genealogy Children
Showing 0-0 of 0
I Date IDescription Parents IAction I Children
No records found.








 











!"# $$%&!

'




()*

)

!"#
++,-.-/0++ 1231232451 1536736166
89:;< =:< ++,-.-/0++ ++,-.-/0++ ++,-.-/0++ 6>111616?@

ABCDEFB GEHIEHDJIJKBLHMDDBNNHLEA OBCP DELIMDIN IBDOLJDMCHNQPPERI 4/18/22, 1:44 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/ 1/1
100 m  Map data ©2022
 GeoSear Tch for a Pr rackeroject W Ventura Blvd & Springville Drive, Camarillo, CA, USA  Home  Download Data  Tools  Contact Us LEGEND - CHOOSE MORE SITES 
LUST Cleanup Sites - REMOVE
Cleanup Program Sites - REMOVE
Military Cleanup Sites - REMOVE
Military Privatized Sites - REMOVE
Military UST Sites - REMOVE
Signifies a Closed Site
ACTIVE MAP COVERAGES:
• Military Bases -     - REMOVE
Sites Shown on Map:  6 Total Sites  1 Open Sites  5 Closed Sites  4 Sites w/Water Quality Data  SITES VISIBLE ON MAP - CHOOSE FIELDS ×

SITE NAME STATUS

BOY SCOUT OFFICE COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CHEVRON #9-8749 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CHEVRON #9-8749 COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
MOBIL OIL SS #18-LR4 OPEN - REMEDIATION

PEPPER TREE COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED

TEXACO SS - VENTURA COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
4/18/22, 1:48 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0611100043 1/1 Back to Top Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy Accessibility
Contact Us
Copyright © 2022 State of California
BOY SCOUT OFFICE (T0611100043) - (MAP) SIGN UP FOR EMAIL 509 DAILY DR W
CAMARILLO, CA 93010

VENTURA COUNTY

LUST CLEANUP SITE (INFO)
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 6/19/1986 - DEFINITION

PRINTABLE CASE SUMMARY / CSM REPORT

CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4) (LEAD) - CASE #:

CASEWORKER: YUE RONG

VENTURA COUNTY
Regulatory Profile PRINTABLE CASE SUMM

CLEANUP STATUS - DEFINITIONS
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 6/19/1986 - CLEANUP STATUS HISTORY

POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN

GASOLINE

POTENTIAL MEDIA OF CONCERN
SOIL

FILE LOCATION DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BENEFICIAL USE(S) - DEFINITIONS MUN, AGR, IND, PROC - Note: Unconfined/perched aquifers- MUN-P

DWR GROUNDWATER SUB-BASIN NAME
Pleasant Valley (4-006)

CALWATER WATERSHED NAME
Calleguas - Oxnard Plain - Pleasant Valley (408.12)
Site History
No site history available
Summary Cleanup Action Report Regulatory Activities Environmental Data (ESI) Site Maps / Documents Community Involvement Related Cases 
4/18/22, 1:49 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/case_summary?global_id=T0611100043 1/2

CASE SUMMARY

REPORT DATE
6/19/1986
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INCIDENT REPORT FILED WITH OES?
I. REPORTED BY -

UNKNOWN

CREATED BY

UNKNOWN
III. SITE LOCATION

FACILITY NAME

BOY SCOUT OFFICE

FACILITY ID

FACILITY ADDRESS
509 DAILY DR W
CAMARILLO, CA 93010

VENTURA COUNTY

ORIENTATION OF SITE TO STREET

CROSS STREET
CARMEN
V. SUBSTANCES RELEASED / CONTAMINANT(S) OF CONCERN

GASOLINE
VI. DISCOVERY/ABATEMENT

DATE DISCHARGE BEGAN

DATE DISCOVERED
6/19/1986

HOW DISCOVERED
Tank Closure

DESCRIPTION

DATE STOPPED
6/19/1986

STOP METHOD DESCRIPTION
VII. SOURCE/CAUSE

SOURCE OF DISCHARGE
Tank

CAUSE OF DISCHARGE
Physc / Mech Damage

DISCHARGE DESCRIPTION
VIII. CASE TYPE

CASE TYPE
Soil
IX. REMEDIAL ACTION

NO REMEDIAL ACTIONS ENTERED
X. GENERAL COMMENTS
XI. CERTIFICATION

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION REPORTED HEREIN
IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.

XII. REGULATORY USE ONLY

LOCAL AGENCY CASE NUMBER REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER
930100125

4/18/22, 1:49 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/case_summary?global_id=T0611100043 2/2 Back to Top Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy Accessibility
Contact Us
Copyright © 2022 State of California

LOCAL AGENCY

UNKNOWN

REGIONAL BOARD

CONTACT NAME

YUE RONG

INITIALS
YR
ORGANIZATION_NAME
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)

EMAIL ADDRESS
[email protected]

ADDRESS
320 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 200
Los Angeles, CA 90013

CONTACT DESCRIPTION
4/18/22, 1:50 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0611186512 1/1 Back to Top Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy Accessibility
Contact Us
Copyright © 2022 State of California
CHEVRON #9-8749 (T0611186512) - (MAP) SIGN UP FOR EMAIL 522 LAS POSAS RD
CAMARILLO, CA 93010

VENTURA COUNTY

LUST CLEANUP SITE (INFO)
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 12/3/2009 - DEFINITION

PRINTABLE CASE SUMMARY / CSM REPORT

CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES
VENTURA COUNTY (LEAD) - CASE #: 07005
CASEWORKER: GINA TERESA
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4) - CASE
CASEWORKER: UNKNOWN
Regulatory Profile PRINTABLE CASE SUMM

CLEANUP STATUS - DEFINITIONS
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 12/3/2009 - CLEANUP STATUS HISTORY

POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN

GASOLINE

POTENTIAL MEDIA OF CONCERN
SOIL

FILE LOCATION DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BENEFICIAL USE(S) - DEFINITIONS MUN, AGR, IND, PROC - Note: Unconfined/perched aquifers- MUN-P

DWR GROUNDWATER SUB-BASIN NAME
Pleasant Valley (4-006)

CALWATER WATERSHED NAME
Calleguas - Oxnard Plain - Pleasant Valley (408.12)
Site History
No site history available
Summary Case Reviews Cleanup Action Report Regulatory Activities Environmental Data (ESI) Site Maps / Documents Community Involvement Related Cases 
4/18/22, 1:50 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/case_summary?global_id=T0611186512 1/2

CASE SUMMARY

REPORT DATE
11/14/2007
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INCIDENT REPORT FILED WITH OES?
N
I. REPORTED BY -

CONTACT NAME

WALT FRIESEN
INITIALS ORGANIZATION_NAME

CHEVRON PRODUCTS CO

EMAIL ADDRESS

ADDRESS
145 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD
BREA, CA 92821

CONTACT DESCRIPTION

PHONE TYPE PHONE NUMBER EXTENSION
PHONE (714)-671-3226

CREATED BY

UNKNOWN
III. SITE LOCATION

FACILITY NAME
CHEVRON #9-8749

FACILITY ID

FACILITY ADDRESS
522 LAS POSAS RD
CAMARILLO, CA 93010

VENTURA COUNTY

ORIENTATION OF SITE TO STREET

CROSS STREET
V. SUBSTANCES RELEASED / CONTAMINANT(S) OF CONCERN

GASOLINE
VI. DISCOVERY/ABATEMENT

DATE DISCHARGE BEGAN

DATE DISCOVERED
11/8/2007

HOW DISCOVERED
Other Means

DESCRIPTION

DATE STOPPED
11/8/2007

STOP METHOD
Other Means

DESCRIPTION
VII. SOURCE/CAUSE

SOURCE OF DISCHARGE
Other

CAUSE OF DISCHARGE
Unknown

DISCHARGE DESCRIPTION
VIII. CASE TYPE

CASE TYPE
Soil
IX. REMEDIAL ACTION

REMEDIAL ACTION BEGIN DATE END DATE DESCRIPTION
Excavation 11/9/2007 11/9/2007
X. GENERAL COMMENTS

4/18/22, 1:50 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/case_summary?global_id=T0611186512 2/2 Back to Top Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy Accessibility
Contact Us
Copyright © 2022 State of California
XI. CERTIFICATION

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION REPORTED HEREIN
IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.

XII. REGULATORY USE ONLY

LOCAL AGENCY CASE NUMBER
07005

REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER
C07005

LOCAL AGENCY

CONTACT NAME

GINA TERESA

INITIALS
GLT
ORGANIZATION_NAME

VENTURA COUNTY

EMAIL ADDRESS
[email protected]

ADDRESS
800 S. VICTORIA AVENUE
VENTURA, CA 93009

CONTACT DESCRIPTION

PHONE TYPE PHONE NUMBER EXTENSION
OFFICE (805)-662-6511

REGIONAL BOARD

CONTACT NAME

UNKNOWN

INITIALS
UNK
ORGANIZATION_NAME
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)

EMAIL ADDRESS

ADDRESS
320 W 4TH STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90013

CONTACT DESCRIPTION
4/18/22, 1:51 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0611100179 1/1 Back to Top Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy Accessibility
Contact Us
Copyright © 2022 State of California
CHEVRON #9-8749 (T0611100179) - (MAP) SIGN UP FOR EMAIL 522 LAS POSAS RD
CAMARILLO, CA 93010

VENTURA COUNTY

LUST CLEANUP SITE (INFO)
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 3/29/2004 - DEFINITION

PRINTABLE CASE SUMMARY / CSM REPORT
CUF Claim #: 4930
CUF Priority Assigned: D
CUF Amount Paid:

CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES
VENTURA COUNTY (LEAD) - CASE #: 87020
CASEWORKER: ERIN K. O'CONNELL
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4) - CASE
CASEWORKER: DANIEL PIROTTON
Regulatory Profile PRINTABLE CASE SUMM

CLEANUP STATUS - DEFINITIONS
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 3/29/2004 - CLEANUP STATUS HISTORY

POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN

GASOLINE

POTENTIAL MEDIA OF CONCERN

OTHER GROUNDWATER (USES OTHER THAN DRINKING WATER)

FILE LOCATION

ALL FILES ARE ON GEOTRACKER OR IN THE LOCAL AGENCY DATABASE

DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BENEFICIAL USE(S) - DEFINITIONS
MUN, AGR, IND, PROC - Note: Unconfined/perched aquifers- MUN-P

DWR GROUNDWATER SUB-BASIN NAME
Pleasant Valley (4-006)

CALWATER WATERSHED NAME
Calleguas - Oxnard Plain - Pleasant Valley (408.12)
Site History
No site history available
Summary Cleanup Action Report Regulatory Activities Environmental Data (ESI) Site Maps / Documents Community Involvement Related Cases LUST CUF Data 
4/18/22, 1:51 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/case_summary?global_id=T0611100179 1/2

CASE SUMMARY

REPORT DATE
2/20/1987
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INCIDENT REPORT FILED WITH OES?
I. REPORTED BY -

UNKNOWN

CREATED BY

UNKNOWN
III. SITE LOCATION

FACILITY NAME
CHEVRON #9-8749

FACILITY ID

FACILITY ADDRESS
522 LAS POSAS RD
CAMARILLO, CA 93010

VENTURA COUNTY

ORIENTATION OF SITE TO STREET

CROSS STREET
V. SUBSTANCES RELEASED / CONTAMINANT(S) OF CONCERN

GASOLINE
VI. DISCOVERY/ABATEMENT

DATE DISCHARGE BEGAN

DATE DISCOVERED
2/18/1987

HOW DISCOVERED DESCRIPTION

DATE STOPPED
2/19/1987

STOP METHOD DESCRIPTION
VII. SOURCE/CAUSE

SOURCE OF DISCHARGE CAUSE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE DESCRIPTION
VIII. CASE TYPE

CASE TYPE
Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)
IX. REMEDIAL ACTION

NO REMEDIAL ACTIONS ENTERED
X. GENERAL COMMENTS
XI. CERTIFICATION

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION REPORTED HEREIN
IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.

XII. REGULATORY USE ONLY

LOCAL AGENCY CASE NUMBER
87020

REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER
C87020

LOCAL AGENCY

4/18/22, 1:51 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/case_summary?global_id=T0611100179 2/2 Back to Top Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy Accessibility
Contact Us
Copyright © 2022 State of California

CONTACT NAME
ERIN K. O'CONNELL

INITIALS
EKO
ORGANIZATION_NAME

VENTURA COUNTY

EMAIL ADDRESS
[email protected]

ADDRESS
800 S. VICTORIA AVE
VENTURA, CA 93009

CONTACT DESCRIPTION
Supervisor of LUFT Program and Voluntary Cleanup Program, Professional Geologist (CA and OR), Certified Engineering Geologist (CA)

PHONE TYPE PHONE NUMBER EXTENSION
Fax (805)-477-1595
Direct (805)-662-6511

REGIONAL BOARD

CONTACT NAME

DANIEL PIROTTON

INITIALS
DPP
ORGANIZATION_NAME
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)

EMAIL ADDRESS
[email protected]

ADDRESS
R4 UNKNOWN, CA

CONTACT DESCRIPTION

PHONE TYPE PHONE NUMBER EXTENSION
Phone (213)-576-6714
Fax (213)-576-6700
4/18/22, 1:52 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0611100544 1/1 Back to Top Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy Accessibility
Contact Us
Copyright © 2022 State of California
MOBIL OIL SS #18-LR4 (T0611100544) - (MAP) SIGN UP FOR EMAIL 501 LAS POSAS RD
CAMARILLO, CA 93010

VENTURA COUNTY

LUST CLEANUP SITE (INFO)
OPEN - REMEDIATION AS OF 3/23/2015 - DEFINITION

PRINTABLE CASE SUMMARY / CSM REPORT
CUF Claim #: 5768
CUF Priority Assigned: D
CUF Amount Paid: $772,980

CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4) (LEAD) - CASE
CASEWORKER: DANIEL PIROTTON
SWRCB - CASE #: 89143
CASEWORKER: MATTHEW COHEN
VENTURA COUNTY - CASE #: 89143
Regulatory Profile PRINTABLE CASE SUMM

CLEANUP STATUS - DEFINITIONS
OPEN - REMEDIATION AS OF 3/23/2015 - CLEANUP STATUS HISTORY

POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN

GASOLINE

POTENTIAL MEDIA OF CONCERN

OTHER GROUNDWATER (USES OTHER THAN DRINKING WATER)

FILE LOCATION

LOCAL AGENCY WAREHOUSE

DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BENEFICIAL USE(S) - DEFINITIONS
MUN, AGR, IND, PROC - Note: Unconfined/perched aquifers- MUN-P

DWR GROUNDWATER SUB-BASIN NAME
Pleasant Valley (4-006)

CALWATER WATERSHED NAME
Calleguas - Oxnard Plain - Pleasant Valley (408.12)

GROUNDWATER MONITORING FREQUENCY
# OF WELLS MONITORED - QUARTERLY : 5, SEMI-ANNUALLY : 4, ANNUALLY : 4, OTHER : 2 REASONS FOR QUARTERLY OR MONTHLY OR OTHER GROUNDWATER MONITORING:

WDR Permit Requirement - WDR requires quarterly monitoring;remediation using Fenton's Reagent Well Being Sampled During Remedial Action for Progress Assessment - Monitor treatment and observation wells quarterly to evaluate remedial progress Site History
BLANK
Summary Case Reviews Cleanup Action Report Regulatory Activities Environmental Data (ESI) Site Maps / Documents Community Involvement Related Cases LUST CUF Data 
4/18/22, 1:52 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/case_summary?global_id=T0611100544 1/2

CASE SUMMARY

REPORT DATE
10/2/1989
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INCIDENT REPORT FILED WITH OES?
I. REPORTED BY -

UNKNOWN

CREATED BY

UNKNOWN
III. SITE LOCATION

FACILITY NAME
MOBIL OIL SS #18-LR4

FACILITY ID

FACILITY ADDRESS
501 LAS POSAS RD
CAMARILLO, CA 93010

VENTURA COUNTY

ORIENTATION OF SITE TO STREET

CROSS STREET
V. SUBSTANCES RELEASED / CONTAMINANT(S) OF CONCERN

GASOLINE
VI. DISCOVERY/ABATEMENT

DATE DISCHARGE BEGAN

DATE DISCOVERED
10/2/1989

HOW DISCOVERED DESCRIPTION

DATE STOPPED
10/3/1989

STOP METHOD DESCRIPTION
VII. SOURCE/CAUSE

SOURCE OF DISCHARGE CAUSE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE DESCRIPTION
VIII. CASE TYPE

CASE TYPE
Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)
IX. REMEDIAL ACTION

REMEDIAL ACTION BEGIN
DATE
END
DATE

DESCRIPTION
In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment
(other than SVE)
5/8/1998 9/3/2004 Air diffusion in AS-1, MW-1, -3 & -4
Dual Phase Extraction 7/1/2002 10/1/2002
In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment
(other than SVE)
10/14/2002 10/17/200272 hour HVDPE event. Volume is pounds of hydrocargons. Also extracted 5,500 gal water.

In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment
(other than SVE)
9/3/2004 Oxygen diffusion - Waterloo emitter in MW-10 and MW-2 X. GENERAL COMMENTS
BLANK
XI. CERTIFICATION

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION REPORTED HEREIN

4/18/22, 1:52 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/case_summary?global_id=T0611100544 2/2 Back to Top Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy Accessibility
Contact Us
Copyright © 2022 State of California
IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.

XII. REGULATORY USE ONLY

LOCAL AGENCY CASE NUMBER
89143

REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER
C-89143

LOCAL AGENCY

UNKNOWN

REGIONAL BOARD

CONTACT NAME

DANIEL PIROTTON

INITIALS
DPP
ORGANIZATION_NAME
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)

EMAIL ADDRESS
[email protected]

ADDRESS
R4 UNKNOWN, CA

CONTACT DESCRIPTION

PHONE TYPE PHONE NUMBER EXTENSION
Phone (213)-576-6714
Fax (213)-576-6700
4/18/22, 1:53 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0611100469 1/1 Back to Top Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy Accessibility
Contact Us
Copyright © 2022 State of California
PEPPER TREE (T0611100469) - (MAP) SIGN UP FOR EMAIL
158 LAS POSAS RD
CAMARILLO, CA 93003

VENTURA COUNTY

LUST CLEANUP SITE (INFO)
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 12/11/1989 - DEFINITION

PRINTABLE CASE SUMMARY / CSM REPORT

CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES
VENTURA COUNTY (LEAD) - CASE #: 89049
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4) - CASE
CASEWORKER: DANIEL PIROTTON
Regulatory Profile PRINTABLE CASE SUMM

CLEANUP STATUS - DEFINITIONS
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 12/11/1989 - CLEANUP STATUS HISTORY

POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN

GASOLINE

POTENTIAL MEDIA OF CONCERN
SOIL

FILE LOCATION DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BENEFICIAL USE(S) - DEFINITIONS MUN, AGR, IND, PROC - Note: Unconfined/perched aquifers- MUN-P

DWR GROUNDWATER SUB-BASIN NAME
Pleasant Valley (4-006)

CALWATER WATERSHED NAME
Calleguas - Oxnard Plain - Pleasant Valley (408.12)
Site History
No site history available
Summary Cleanup Action Report Regulatory Activities Environmental Data (ESI) Site Maps / Documents Community Involvement Related Cases 
4/18/22, 1:53 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/case_summary?global_id=T0611100469 1/2

CASE SUMMARY

REPORT DATE
4/17/1989
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INCIDENT REPORT FILED WITH OES?
I. REPORTED BY -

UNKNOWN

CREATED BY

UNKNOWN
III. SITE LOCATION

FACILITY NAME

PEPPER TREE

FACILITY ID

FACILITY ADDRESS
158 LAS POSAS RD
CAMARILLO, CA 93003

VENTURA COUNTY

ORIENTATION OF SITE TO STREET

CROSS STREET
V. SUBSTANCES RELEASED / CONTAMINANT(S) OF CONCERN

GASOLINE
VI. DISCOVERY/ABATEMENT

DATE DISCHARGE BEGAN

DATE DISCOVERED
4/17/1989

HOW DISCOVERED DESCRIPTION

DATE STOPPED STOP METHOD DESCRIPTION
VII. SOURCE/CAUSE

SOURCE OF DISCHARGE CAUSE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE DESCRIPTION
VIII. CASE TYPE

CASE TYPE
Soil
IX. REMEDIAL ACTION

NO REMEDIAL ACTIONS ENTERED
X. GENERAL COMMENTS
XI. CERTIFICATION

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION REPORTED HEREIN
IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.

XII. REGULATORY USE ONLY

LOCAL AGENCY CASE NUMBER
89049

REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER
C-89049

LOCAL AGENCY

4/18/22, 1:53 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/case_summary?global_id=T0611100469 2/2 Back to Top Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy Accessibility
Contact Us
Copyright © 2022 State of California

UNKNOWN

REGIONAL BOARD

CONTACT NAME

DANIEL PIROTTON

INITIALS
DPP
ORGANIZATION_NAME
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)

EMAIL ADDRESS
[email protected]

ADDRESS
R4 UNKNOWN, CA

CONTACT DESCRIPTION

PHONE TYPE PHONE NUMBER EXTENSION
Phone (213)-576-6714
Fax (213)-576-6700
4/18/22, 1:54 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T061111466 1/1 Back to Top Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy Accessibility
Contact Us
Copyright © 2022 State of California
TEXACO SS - VENTURA (T061111466) - (MAP) SIGN UP FOR EMAIL 107 W VENTURA BLVD
CAMARILLO, CA 93010

VENTURA COUNTY

LUST CLEANUP SITE (INFO)
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 9/17/2012 - DEFINITION

PRINTABLE CASE SUMMARY / CSM REPORT
CUF Claim #: 19578
CUF Priority Assigned: D
CUF Amount Paid:

CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES
VENTURA COUNTY (LEAD) - CASE #: 0102
CASEWORKER: DIANE B. WAHL
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4) - CAS
CASEWORKER: UNKNOWN
Regulatory Profile PRINTABLE CASE SUMM

CLEANUP STATUS - DEFINITIONS
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 9/17/2012 - CLEANUP STATUS HISTORY

POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN

GASOLINE

POTENTIAL MEDIA OF CONCERN

OTHER GROUNDWATER (USES OTHER THAN DRINKING WATER)

FILE LOCATION DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BENEFICIAL USE(S) - DEFINITIONS MUN, AGR, IND, PROC - Note: Unconfined/perched aquifers- MUN-P

DWR GROUNDWATER SUB-BASIN NAME
Pleasant Valley (4-006)

CALWATER WATERSHED NAME
Calleguas - Oxnard Plain - Pleasant Valley (408.12)

GROUNDWATER MONITORING FREQUENCY
# OF WELLS MONITORED - QUARTERLY : 4, SEMI-ANNUALLY : 17, ANNUALLY : 1 REASONS FOR QUARTERLY OR MONTHLY OR OTHER GROUNDWATER MONITORING:

Well Being Sampled During Remedial Action for Progress Assessment - OPIS SYSTEM Site History
BLANK
Summary Case Reviews Cleanup Action Report Regulatory Activities Environmental Data (ESI) Site Maps / Documents Community Involvement Related Cases 
4/18/22, 1:54 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/case_summary?global_id=T061111466 1/2

CASE SUMMARY

REPORT DATE
10/31/2001
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INCIDENT REPORT FILED WITH OES?
I. REPORTED BY -

UNKNOWN

CREATED BY

UNKNOWN
III. SITE LOCATION

FACILITY NAME

TEXACO SS - VENTURA

FACILITY ID

FACILITY ADDRESS
107 W VENTURA BLVD
CAMARILLO, CA 93010

VENTURA COUNTY

ORIENTATION OF SITE TO STREET

CROSS STREET

BAJO AGUA
V. SUBSTANCES RELEASED / CONTAMINANT(S) OF CONCERN

GASOLINE
VI. DISCOVERY/ABATEMENT

DATE DISCHARGE BEGAN

DATE DISCOVERED
10/31/2001

HOW DISCOVERED
Other Means

DESCRIPTION

DATE STOPPED
10/31/2001

STOP METHOD DESCRIPTION
VII. SOURCE/CAUSE

SOURCE OF DISCHARGE
Other

CAUSE OF DISCHARGE
Unknown

DISCHARGE DESCRIPTION
VIII. CASE TYPE

CASE TYPE
Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)
IX. REMEDIAL ACTION

REMEDIAL ACTION BEGIN
DATE
END
DATE

DESCRIPTION
Excavation 10/22/200310/22/2003Select UST system confirmation samples were overexcavated. Total of 131 tons of soil (construction & overexcavated) generated was disposed off site.

In Situ Physical/Chemical
Treatment (other than SVE)
8/18/2004 8/21/2004 DPE pilot testing.

Other (Use Description Field) 12/11/2006 2/23/2007 periodic overpurge of select wells In Situ Physical/Chemical
Treatment (other than SVE)
1/30/2009 8/24/2011 OPIS (oxygen pulse injection),
X. GENERAL COMMENTS
BLANK

4/18/22, 1:54 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/case_summary?global_id=T061111466 2/2 Back to Top Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy Accessibility
Contact Us
Copyright © 2022 State of California
XI. CERTIFICATION

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION REPORTED HEREIN
IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.

XII. REGULATORY USE ONLY

LOCAL AGENCY CASE NUMBER
01027

REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER
01027

LOCAL AGENCY

CONTACT NAME
DIANE B. WAHL

INITIALS
DBW
ORGANIZATION_NAME

VENTURA COUNTY

EMAIL ADDRESS
[email protected]

ADDRESS
800 S. VICTORIA AVE.

VENTURA, CA 93009-0001

CONTACT DESCRIPTION

PHONE TYPE PHONE NUMBER EXTENSION
PHONE (805)-654-5040

REGIONAL BOARD

CONTACT NAME

UNKNOWN

INITIALS
UNK
ORGANIZATION_NAME
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)

EMAIL ADDRESS

ADDRESS
320 W 4TH STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90013

CONTACT DESCRIPTION
4/18/22, 1:55 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0611101156 1/1 Back to Top Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy Accessibility
Contact Us
Copyright © 2022 State of California
UNOCAL #5228 (FORMER TOSCO - 76 SS) (T0611101156) - (MAP) SIGN UP FOR EMAIL 672 LAS POSAS RD
CAMARILLO, CA 93010

VENTURA COUNTY

LUST CLEANUP SITE (INFO)
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 12/28/2020 - DEFINITION

PRINTABLE CASE SUMMARY / CSM REPORT
CUF Claim #: 16317
CUF Priority Assigned: D
CUF Amount Paid:

CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4) (LEAD) - CASE
CASEWORKER: DANIEL PIROTTON
VENTURA COUNTY - CASE #: 97041
Regulatory Profile PRINTABLE CASE SUMM

CLEANUP STATUS - DEFINITIONS
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 12/28/2020 - CLEANUP STATUS HISTORY

POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN

GASOLINE

POTENTIAL MEDIA OF CONCERN

OTHER GROUNDWATER (USES OTHER THAN DRINKING WATER)

FILE LOCATION

LOCAL AGENCY WAREHOUSE

DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BENEFICIAL USE(S) - DEFINITIONS
MUN, AGR, IND, PROC - Note: Unconfined/perched aquifers- MUN-P

DWR GROUNDWATER SUB-BASIN NAME
Pleasant Valley (4-006)

CALWATER WATERSHED NAME
Calleguas - Oxnard Plain - Pleasant Valley (408.12)

GROUNDWATER MONITORING FREQUENCY
# OF WELLS MONITORED - QUARTERLY : 12, SEMI-ANNUALLY : 2, ANNUALLY : 1 REASONS FOR QUARTERLY OR MONTHLY OR OTHER GROUNDWATER MONITORING:

Well Being Sampled During Remedial Action for Progress Assessment - DPE initiated 08/31/09. Need quarterly monitoring to evaluate progress.

Site History
BLANK
Summary Case Reviews Cleanup Action Report Regulatory Activities Environmental Data (ESI) Site Maps / Documents Community Involvement Related Cases 
4/18/22, 1:55 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/case_summary?global_id=T0611101156 1/2

CASE SUMMARY

REPORT DATE
11/6/1997
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INCIDENT REPORT FILED WITH OES?
I. REPORTED BY -

UNKNOWN

CREATED BY

UNKNOWN
III. SITE LOCATION

FACILITY NAME
UNOCAL #5228 (FORMER TOSCO - 76 SS)

FACILITY ID

FACILITY ADDRESS
672 LAS POSAS RD
CAMARILLO, CA 93010

VENTURA COUNTY

ORIENTATION OF SITE TO STREET

CROSS STREET
V. SUBSTANCES RELEASED / CONTAMINANT(S) OF CONCERN

GASOLINE
VI. DISCOVERY/ABATEMENT

DATE DISCHARGE BEGAN

DATE DISCOVERED
11/6/1997

HOW DISCOVERED DESCRIPTION

DATE STOPPED
11/7/1997

STOP METHOD DESCRIPTION
VII. SOURCE/CAUSE

SOURCE OF DISCHARGE CAUSE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE DESCRIPTION
VIII. CASE TYPE

CASE TYPE
Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)
IX. REMEDIAL ACTION

REMEDIAL ACTION BEGIN
DATE
END
DATE

DESCRIPTION
Excavation 11/1/1997 11/1/1997 Excavate soil contam by gasoline from product line punctured by GeoProbe.

In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other
than SVE)
3/15/2001 3/16/2001 48-hour dual phase extraction test
Other (Use Description Field) 5/15/2001 12/15/2001Overpurge MW-2 - MW-5 to remove LPH Excavation 6/15/2001 6/15/2001 Overexcavation following UST removal & station demolition Excavation 7/1/2001 7/1/2001
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) 10/1/2002 10/15/2003Dual phase extraction to treat both soil and groundwater In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other
than SVE)
10/24/2002 7/12/2004 Dual phase extraction to treat both soil and groundwater Dual Phase Extraction 11/1/2002 2/1/2015 VAPOR
Dual Phase Extraction 11/1/2002 2/1/2015
In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other 9/13/2005 9/14/2005 Treatment using modified Fenton's Reagent 
4/18/22, 1:55 PM GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/case_summary?global_id=T0611101156 2/2 Back to Top Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy Accessibility
Contact Us
Copyright © 2022 State of California
than SVE)
In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other
than SVE)
1/12/2006 1/13/2006 Treatment using modified Fenton's Reagent In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other
than SVE)
6/20/2006 6/22/2006 Treatment using modified Fenton's Reagent Pump & Treat (P&T) Groundwater 9/9/2009
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) 9/14/2009 SVE restarted 09/14/09 to remediate residual contam in vadose zone.

In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other
than SVE)
9/28/2009
X. GENERAL COMMENTS
BLANK
XI. CERTIFICATION

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION REPORTED HEREIN
IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.

XII. REGULATORY USE ONLY

LOCAL AGENCY CASE NUMBER
97041

REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER
C-97041

LOCAL AGENCY

UNKNOWN

REGIONAL BOARD

CONTACT NAME

DANIEL PIROTTON

INITIALS
DPP
ORGANIZATION_NAME
LOS ANGELES RWQCB (REGION 4)

EMAIL ADDRESS
[email protected]

ADDRESS
R4 UNKNOWN, CA

CONTACT DESCRIPTION

PHONE TYPE PHONE NUMBER EXTENSION
Phone (213)-576-6714
Fax (213)-576-6700
4/18/22, 2:06 PM EnviroStor Database
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=W+Ventura+Blvd+%26+Springville+Dr 1/1 200 m  Map data ©2022 Google

ENVIROSTOR
Sites and Facilities
Cleanup Sites
Federal Superfund
State Response
Voluntary Cleanup
School Cleanup
Evaluation
School Investigation
Military Evaluation
Tiered Permit
Corrective Action
Field Points
STATUS
All Statuses
Permitted Sites
Operating
Post-Closure
Non-Operating
Other Sites
SITES CURRENTLY VISIBLE ON MAP 4 SITES LISTED EXPORT THIS LIST TO EXCEL

PROJECT NAME STATUS PROJECT TYPE ADDRESS CITY

OXNARD FLIGHT STRIP INACTIVE - NEEDS

EVALUATION MILITARY EVALUATION OXNARD

OXNARD LANDING STRIP INACTIVE - NEEDS

EVALUATION MILITARY EVALUATION OXNARD

SPRINGVILLE EAST NO FURTHER ACTION VOLUNTARY CLEANUP EARL JOSEPH DRIVE &

PONDEROSA DRIVE CAMARILLO
SPRINGVILLE PROPERTY NO FURTHER ACTION VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PONDEROSA DRIVE AND US.

HIGHWAY 101 CAMARILLO
W Ventura Blvd & Springville Dr
Map Address
4/18/22, 2:07 PM EnviroStor
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=80000858 1/1 Back to Top Help
Disclaimer Contact Us
DTSC Home
Copyright © 2022 State of California

2.371094 seconds
OXNARD FLIGHT STRIP (80000858) SIGN UP FOR EMAIL
OXNARD, CA 93030

VENTURA COUNTY
SITE TYPE: FUDS
SUPERVISOR: DOUGLAS BA
OFFICE: CLEANUP CYP
CENSUS TRACT: 6111005600
CALENVIROSCREEN PERCENTILE SCORE: 45-50%
Site Information

CLEANUP STATUS
INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 12/15/2015
SITE TYPE: FUDS
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST: NO
ACRES: 25 ACRES
APN: NONE SPECIFIED
CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES:

DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY
ENVIROSTOR ID: 80000858
SITE CODE:

SPECIAL PROGRAM:

FUNDING: DERA
ASSEMBLY DISTRICT: 44
SENATE DISTRICT: 19
Regulatory Profile

PAST USE(S) THAT CAUSED CONTAMINATION
FIRING RANGE - ARTILLERY, FIRING RANGE - SMALL ARMS ETC...

POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN

EXPLOSIVES (UXO, MEC)

MUNITIONS DEBRIS (MD)

RDX (CYCLONITE)

POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED

SOIL, SOIL VAPOR
Site History
The identifying characteristics of a flight strip are:

A single paved runway (bituminous or concrete), between 1,800 and 8,000 feet long.

Located adjacent (and parallel) to an existing highway.

Some military use, either fully or on a joint-use basis.

Oxnard Flight Strip CA. Camarillo.

Summary Activities Site/Facility Docs Sub-Areas Map Related Sites CalEnviroScreen 
4/18/22, 2:07 PM EnviroStor
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=80000346 1/1 Back to Top Help
Disclaimer Contact Us
DTSC Home
Copyright © 2022 State of California

2.148438 seconds
OXNARD LANDING STRIP (80000346) SIGN UP FOR EMAIL

OXNARD, CA

VENTURA COUNTY
SITE TYPE: FUDS
SUPERVISOR: DOUGLAS BA
OFFICE: CLEANUP CYP
CENSUS TRACT: 6111005600
CALENVIROSCREEN PERCENTILE SCORE: 45-50%
Site Information

CLEANUP STATUS
INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 7/1/2005
SITE TYPE: FUDS
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST: NO
ACRES: 0 ACRES
APN: NONE SPECIFIED
CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES:

DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY
ENVIROSTOR ID: 80000346
SITE CODE:

SPECIAL PROGRAM:

FUNDING: DERA
ASSEMBLY DISTRICT: 44
SENATE DISTRICT: 19
Regulatory Profile

PAST USE(S) THAT CAUSED CONTAMINATION

NONE SPECIFIED

POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN

NONE SPECIFIED

POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED

NONE SPECIFIED
Site History
Summary Sub-Areas Map Related Sites CalEnviroScreen

4/18/22, 2:09 PM EnviroStor
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60002348 1/1 Back to Top Help
Disclaimer Contact Us
DTSC Home
Copyright © 2022 State of California

2.253906 seconds
SPRINGVILLE EAST (60002348) SIGN UP FOR EMAIL

EARL JOSEPH DRIVE & PONDEROSA DRIVE
CAMARILLO, CA 93010

VENTURA COUNTY
SITE TYPE: VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT
PROJECT MANAGER: MANJUL BOSE
SUPERVISOR: ANDRES CAN
OFFICE: CLEANUP

CHATSWORTH
CENSUS TRACT: 6111005205
CALENVIROSCREEN PERCENTILE SCORE: 30-35%
Site Information

CLEANUP STATUS
NO FURTHER ACTION AS OF 10/13/2016
SITE TYPE: VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST: NO
ACRES: 41.47 ACRES
APN: 157-0-020-200
CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES:

DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY
ENVIROSTOR ID: 60002348
SITE CODE: 301753, 301775
SPECIAL PROGRAM: VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT - STANDARD VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT FUNDING: SITE PROPONENT
ASSEMBLY DISTRICT: 44
SENATE DISTRICT: 19
Regulatory Profile

PAST USE(S) THAT CAUSED CONTAMINATION

AGRICULTURAL - ORCHARD, AGRICULTURAL - ROW CROPS

POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN
ENDRIN

TOXAPHENE

POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED
SOIL
Site History
Former agricultural land is being redeveloped into mixed use commercial / residential property. The 41.47 acre site will include 10.67 acres of KB Home Development and an additional 2 acres of residential development (totaling 36 acres). DTSC approved PEA report for No Further Action (NFA) on June 30, 2016.

On August 30, 2016 - Fore Green Development & Fore Property signed a VCA with DTSC for review of the PEA report for 20 acres of the 41.47 acres that will be developed into residen homes. DTSC issued a No Further Action (NFA) to Fore Development on September 26, 2016.

Summary Activities Site/Facility Docs Map Related Sites CalEnviroScreen 
4/18/22, 2:10 PM EnviroStor
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60002114 1/1 Back to Top Help
Disclaimer Contact Us
DTSC Home
Copyright © 2022 State of California

2.296875 seconds
SPRINGVILLE PROPERTY (60002114) SIGN UP FOR EMAIL
PONDEROSA DRIVE AND US. HIGHWAY 101
CAMARILLO, CA 93010

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SITE TYPE: VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT
SUPERVISOR: JAVIER HINOJ
OFFICE: CLEANUP

CHATSWORTH
CENSUS TRACT: 6111005205
CALENVIROSCREEN PERCENTILE SCORE: 30-35%
Site Information

CLEANUP STATUS
NO FURTHER ACTION AS OF 2/26/2015
SITE TYPE: VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST: NO
ACRES: 49 ACRES
APN: NONE SPECIFIED
CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES:

DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY
ENVIROSTOR ID: 60002114
SITE CODE: 301692
SPECIAL PROGRAM: VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT - STANDARD VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT FUNDING: SITE PROPONENT
ASSEMBLY DISTRICT: 44
SENATE DISTRICT: 19
Regulatory Profile

PAST USE(S) THAT CAUSED CONTAMINATION

AGRICULTURAL - ROW CROPS

POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN

TOXAPHENE

POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED
SOIL
Site History
This is a 43-acre site located in Camarillo, California. The site is currently vacant land and has historically been used for as agricultural purposes. A Phase 1 ESA was completed on May 2014. A Phase 2 ESA was completed on September 8, 2014. Soil samples revealed elevated concentrations of toxaphene across most of the property, extending 1.0 to 2.5 feet below g PEA Equivalent identified minor discrepancies requiring a supplemental Site investigation and revised risk assessment calculations. SSI and HRA data was reviewed and deemed accep for unrestricted land use. NFA issued on 02-26-2015.

Summary Activities Site/Facility Docs Map Related Sites CalEnviroScreen 
101 101
180' MIN. CLEAR 64' 64' 64' 11' 64' 64' 64' 64' 64' 70' 30' 10' 64' 64' 64' 64' 64' 30' 30' 30' V 20'
5 45' 30' 64' 64' 64' 15' 64' 64'
70' 24'
91'-3 1/2" 64'-7" 75'-6" 30'

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION
CAUTION CAUTIONCAUTION 30' 40'
40' 30' 26' 11'-6" CAUTIONCAUTION CAUTIONCAUTION CAUTIONCAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION
CAUTION 34' 10'
24' 19 36 36 36 36 ADJACENT LOT (NOT A PART) CONNECTION TO ADJACENT SITE 22 36 36 36 36 36 35 27 21 19 14 26 25 16 14 12 19 534363636 16 14 16
8 11 28 7
1 10' 30' 10' 40' 26' 40' 10' VENTURA FREEWAY (US HIGHWAY 101) 170' TUNNEL 4 X 4 GAS 30' 20'
59'-10" PROPOSED LOT SUB-DIVISION 499 95 236 11 40' 30' AIRPORT SERVICE ROAD ADJACENT LOT (NOT A PART)

SPRINGVILLE DRIVE

FREEWAY ON-RAMP CAMARILLO AIRPORT RUNWAY
LAS POSAS ROAD W. PONDEROSA DRIVE 10' 64' 70' 30' 30' BUILDING AREA: 160,938 SF SITE AREA: 20.18 AC (878,913 SF) STALLS: 841 WEST VENTURA BOULEVARD 30' 152' EXISTING HOME DEPOT EXISTING SHOPS 40' 10' PROPOSED OVERLAND ROAD EXTENSION OFFICE PARK STORAGE MICHAELS STAPLES WALMART ROSS TARGET CAMARILLO TOWN CENTER

OVERLAND ROAD

OVERLAND ROAD
EXIT RAMP © MG2, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from MG2. COSTCO WHOLESALE AERIAL SITE PLAN C A M A R I L L O , C A L I F O R N I A F E B R U A R Y 2 , 2 0 2 2 NEC W. VENTURA BLVD. & SPRINGVILLE DRIVE CAMARILLO, CA 93010 21-5968-01 FEBRUARY 2, 2022 AERIAL SITE PLAN P11-01B 0 100' 200' 400' 1" = 200'-0"
180'
MIN. CLEAR 64' 64' 64' 11' 64' 64' 64' 64' 64' 70'
30' 10' 64' 64' 64' 64' 64' 30'
30' 30'
V 20'
5 45'
30' 64' 64' 64' 15' 64' 64'
70' 24'
91'-3 1/2" 64'-7"
75'-6" 30'

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION CAUTIONCAUTION
30' 40'
40'
30' 26' 11'-6" CAUTIONCAUTION CAUTIONCAUTION CAUTIONCAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION

CAUTION
CAUTION 34' 10'
24'
PROPOSED OVERLAND ROAD EXTENSION 19 36 36 36 36 CONNECTION TO ADJACENT SITE 22 36 36 36 36 36 35 27 21 19 14 26 25 16 14 12 19 534363636 16 14 16
8 11 28 7
1 10' 30' 10' 40'
26' 40' 10' EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING EASEMENT VENTURA FREEWAY (US HIGHWAY 101) 170' TUNNEL 4 X 4 GAS
30' 20'
59'-10" EXISTING HOME DEPOT EXISTING SHOPS PROPOSED LOT SUB-DIVISION 499 95 236 11 40' 30'
OVERLAND ROAD 64' 70' BUILDING AREA: 160,938 SF SITE AREA: 20.18 AC (878,913 SF) STALLS: 841 LUMBER PICK-UP DRIVE-THRU 10' 30' 30' WEST VENTURA BOULEVARD 30' 152' 40' 10' © MG2, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from MG2. COSTCO WHOLESALE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN C A M A R I L L O , C A L I F O R N I A F E B R U A R Y 2 , 2 0 2 2 NEC W. VENTURA BLVD. & SPRINGVILLE DRIVE CAMARILLO, CA 93010 21-5968-01 FEBRUARY 2, 2022 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN P12-01 0 25' 50' 100' 1" = 50'-0" PARKING DATA: BOUNDARIES INFORMATION: BUILDING DATA: TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA: CLIENT: JURISDICTION: TOTAL SITE AREA: ZONING: PROJECT ADDRESS: TOTAL PARKING: PROJECT DATA COSTCO WHOLESALE 999 LAKE DRIVE ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 SITE DATA: INCLUDES: REQUIRED FRONT: 10' SIDE:
0 REAR: 10' NEC W. VENTURA BLVD. & SPRINGVILLE DRIVE CAMARILLO, CA 93010 20.18 AC (878,913 SF) CITY OF CAMARILLO THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED USING ALTA SURVEY BY DRC ENGINEERING 3/4/2016 160,938 SF NOTES: EXISTING CONDITIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. ACCESSIBLE STALLS 18 STALLS COSTCO SITE AREA: SETBACKS: PARKING PROVIDED:
## 10' WIDE STALLS 823 STALLS COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) PARKING REQUIRED: 808 STALLS 841 STALLS 20230187.001A/LH22R139949 May 4, 2022
Copyright 2022 Kleinfelder

APPENDIX D

HISTORICAL RESEARCH DOCUMENTATION
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Camarillo W Ventura Blvd & Springville St Camarillo, CA 93010 April 21, 2022 6950711.3 Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Certified Sanborn Results:

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
- page
The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million
fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris &
Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track
historical property usage in approximately 12,000
American cities and towns. Collections searched:

Library of Congress
University Publications of America
EDR Private Collection
The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™
Limited Permission To Make Copies
Sanborn® Library search results
EDR Inquiry # Contact:

Site Name: Client Name:

Certification #
PO #
Project
04/21/22 W Ventura Blvd & Springville St Camarillo Kleinfelder, Inc. 24411 Ridge Rte Dr Suite 225 Camarillo, CA 93010 6950711.3 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Lindsey Dandridge-Perry The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Kleinfelder, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn.

The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. B1CB-413E-89C7 20230187.001A UNMAPPED PROPERTY Camarillo This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found.

Certification #: B1CB-413E-89C7
Kleinfelder, Inc. (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.

This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY

DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,

WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.

Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 6950711 3 2 The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
Camarillo W Ventura Blvd & Springville St Camarillo, CA 93010 Inquiry Number: April 21, 2022 6950711.11 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
2016 1"=500' Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP
2012 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP
2009 1"=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP
2005 1"=500' Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP
2002 1"=500' Acquisition Date: January 01, 2002 USGS/DOQQ 1994 1"=500' Acquisition Date: September 03, 1994 USGS/DOQQ 1989 1"=500' Acquisition Date: January 01, 1989 USGS/DOQQ 1986 1"=500' Flight Date: August 29, 1986 USDA
1978 1"=500' Flight Date: September 21, 1978 USDA
1967 1"=500' Flight Date: August 13, 1967 USGS
1959 1"=500' Flight Date: October 04, 1959 USDA
1953 1"=500' Flight Date: January 03, 1953 USGS
1947 1"=500' Flight Date: August 15, 1947 USGS
1938 1"=500' Flight Date: May 09, 1938 USDA
1927 1"=500' Flight Date: January 01, 1927 FAIR
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 04/21/22 Camarillo Site Name: Client Name: Kleinfelder, Inc. W Ventura Blvd & Springville St 24411 Ridge Rte Dr Suite 225 Camarillo, CA 93010 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 EDR Inquiry # 6950711.11 Contact: Lindsey Dandridge-Perry Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY

DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,

WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.

Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 6950711 - 11 page 2 6950711.11 2016 = 500'
6950711.11 2012 = 500'
6950711.11 2009 = 500'
6950711.11 2005 = 500'
6950711.11 2002 = 500'
6950711.11 1994 = 500'
6950711.11 1989 = 500'
6950711.11 1986 = 500'
6950711.11 1978 = 500'
6950711.11 1967 = 500'
6950711.11 1959 = 500'
6950711.11 1953 = 500'
6950711.11 1947 = 500'
6950711.11 1938 = 500'
6950711.11 1927 = 500'
Camarillo
W Ventura Blvd & Springville St
Camarillo, CA 93010
Inquiry Number: 6950711.5
April 21, 2022
The EDR-City Directory Abstract
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION
Executive Summary
Findings
City Directory Images
Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING

OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC.

BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER

CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.

All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Abstract is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities.

EDR’s City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data. For each address, the directory lists the name of the corresponding occupant at five year intervals.

Business directories including city, cross reference and telephone directories were reviewed, if available, at approximately five year intervals for the years spanning 1926 through 2017. This report compiles information gathered in this review by geocoding the latitude and longitude of properties identified and gathering information about properties within 660 feet of the target property.

A summary of the information obtained is provided in the text of this report.

RECORD SOURCES
EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun & Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report.

EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright.

RESEARCH SUMMARY
The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report.

Year Source TP Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image
2017 Cole Information Services - X X -
2014 Cole Information Services - X X -
2009 Cole Information Services - X X -
2004 Cole Information Services - X X -
2002 Haines & Company, Inc. - - - -
2000 Pacific Bell Telephone Co - - - -
1999 Cole Information Services - - - -
1996 GTE Directories Corporation - X X -
1994 Cole Information Services - - - -
1993 GTE - - - -
6950711- 5 Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Year Source TP Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image
1986 Pacific Bell - - - -
1985 Pacific Telephone Co - - - -
1980 Polk - - - -
1976 R. L. Polk & Co. - - - -
1975 General Telephone Company of
California
- - - -
1971 B&G Publications - - - -
1970 General Telephone Company of
California
- - - -
1968 B&G Publications - - - -
1965 Polk - - - -
1964 Pacific Telephone Co - - - -
1961 R. L. Polk & Co. - - - -
1957 R. L. Polk & Co. - - - -
1953 R. L. Polk & Co. of California - - - -
1949 Los Angeles Directory Co. - - - -
1940 Southern California - - - -
1930 Los Angeles Directory Co. - - - -
1926 Los Angeles Directory Co. - - - -
6950711- 5 Page 2

FINDINGS

TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION

ADDRESS
W Ventura Blvd & Springville St
Camarillo, CA 93010

FINDINGS DETAIL
Target Property research detail.
6950711- 5 Page 3

FINDINGS

ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL
The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address.

VENTURA BLVD W
420 VENTURA BLVD W
Year Uses Source
1996 GRAMICCI BY SOLE SUM GTE Directories Corporation
424 VENTURA BLVD W
Year Uses Source
1996 BASS APPAREL STORE GTE Directories Corporation
430 VENTURA BLVD W
Year Uses Source
1996 VAN HEUSEN DIRECT NO GTE Directories Corporation
434 VENTURA BLVD W
Year Uses Source
1996 HARRY AND DAVID GTE Directories Corporation

W VENTURA BLVD
415 W VENTURA BLVD
Year Uses Source
2017 G & R CORP Cole Information Services
TMOBILE Cole Information Services
SUBWAY Cole Information Services
GARRETY KAREN OD Cole Information Services
DEPIERRO REALTY ADVISORS Cole Information Services
LINDORA CLINIC Cole Information Services
2014 TMOBILE CAMARILLO Cole Information Services
SUBWAY SANDWICHES Cole Information Services
LINDORA MEDICAL CLINIC Cole Information Services
TMOBILE Cole Information Services
2009 T MOBILE Cole Information Services
6950711- 5 Page 4
Year Uses Source

FINDINGS
Year Uses Source
2009 SUBWAY SANDWICHES & SALADS Cole Information Services LINDORA MEDICAL Cole Information Services
SUBWAY Cole Information Services
T MOBILE CAMARILLO TOWNE CENTER Cole Information Services 2004 T MOBILE CAMARILLO TOWNE CTR Cole Information Services LINDORA INC Cole Information Services
6950711- 5 Page 5

FINDINGS
ADJOINING PROPERTY: ADDRESSES NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in research source.

Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 415 W VENTURA BLVD 2002, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1993, 1986, 1985, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1968, 1965, 1964, 1961, 1957, 1953, 1949, 1940, 1930, 1926 420 VENTURA BLVD W 2017, 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1994, 1993, 1986, 1985, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1968, 1965, 1964, 1961, 1957, 1953, 1949, 1940, 1930, 1926 424 VENTURA BLVD W 2017, 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1994, 1993, 1986, 1985, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1968, 1965, 1964, 1961, 1957, 1953, 1949, 1940, 1930, 1926 430 VENTURA BLVD W 2017, 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1994, 1993, 1986, 1985, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1968, 1965, 1964, 1961, 1957, 1953, 1949, 1940, 1930, 1926 434 VENTURA BLVD W 2017, 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1994, 1993, 1986, 1985, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1968, 1965, 1964, 1961, 1957, 1953, 1949, 1940, 1930, 1926 TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Target Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in the research source.

Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source W Ventura Blvd & Springville St 2017, 2014, 2009, 2004, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1996, 1994, 1993, 1986, 1985, 1980, 1976, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1968, 1965, 1964, 1961, 1957, 1953, 1949, 1940, 1930, 1926 EDR Historical Topo Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
with QuadMatch™
Camarillo W Ventura Blvd & Springville St Camarillo, CA 93010 April 21, 2022 6950711.4 EDR Historical Topo Map Report
EDR Inquiry #
Search Results:

P.O.#
Project:

Maps Provided:

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
- page
Coordinates:

Latitude:

Longitude:

UTM Zone:

UTM X Meters:

UTM Y Meters:

Elevation:

Contact:

Site Name: Client Name:
2018
2015
2012
1967
1951
1950
1947
1943
1904
04/21/22 Camarillo Kleinfelder, Inc. W Ventura Blvd & Springville St 24411 Ridge Rte Dr Suite 225 Camarillo, CA 93010 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 6950711.4 Lindsey Dandridge-Perry EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Kleinfelder, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s.
20230187.001A 34.218223 34° 13' 6" North Camarillo -119.081138 -119° 4' 52" West Zone 11 North 308288.65 3788311.00 85.00' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY

DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,

WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.

Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 6950711 4 2 page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
2018 Source Sheets
2018
Camarillo

7.5-minute, 24000
2015 Source Sheets
2015
Camarillo

7.5-minute, 24000
2012 Source Sheets
2012
Camarillo

7.5-minute, 24000
1967 Source Sheets
1967
Camarillo

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1967
6950711 4 3
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
1951 Source Sheets
1951
Camarillo

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1947
1950 Source Sheets
1950
Camarillo

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1947
1947 Source Sheets
1947

HUENEME
15-minute, 50000
1943 Source Sheets
1943
Hueneme
15-minute, 62500
Aerial Photo Revised 1938
6950711 4 4
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
1904 Source Sheets
1904
Hueneme
15-minute, 62500
6950711 4 5
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
2018 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Camarillo W Ventura Blvd & Springville St Camarillo, CA 93010 Kleinfelder, Inc.

TP, Camarillo, 2018, 7.5-minute
6950711 4 6
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
2015 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Camarillo W Ventura Blvd & Springville St Camarillo, CA 93010 Kleinfelder, Inc.

TP, Camarillo, 2015, 7.5-minute
6950711 4 7
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
2012 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Camarillo W Ventura Blvd & Springville St Camarillo, CA 93010 Kleinfelder, Inc.

TP, Camarillo, 2012, 7.5-minute
6950711 4 8
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1967 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Camarillo W Ventura Blvd & Springville St Camarillo, CA 93010 Kleinfelder, Inc.

TP, Camarillo, 1967, 7.5-minute
6950711 4 9
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1951 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Camarillo W Ventura Blvd & Springville St Camarillo, CA 93010 Kleinfelder, Inc.

TP, Camarillo, 1951, 7.5-minute
6950711 4 10
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1950 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Camarillo W Ventura Blvd & Springville St Camarillo, CA 93010 Kleinfelder, Inc.

TP, Camarillo, 1950, 7.5-minute
6950711 4 11
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1947 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Camarillo W Ventura Blvd & Springville St Camarillo, CA 93010 Kleinfelder, Inc.

TP, HUENEME, 1947, 15-minute
6950711 4 12
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1943 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Camarillo W Ventura Blvd & Springville St Camarillo, CA 93010 Kleinfelder, Inc.

TP, Hueneme, 1943, 15-minute
6950711 4 13
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1904 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Camarillo W Ventura Blvd & Springville St Camarillo, CA 93010 Kleinfelder, Inc.

TP, Hueneme, 1904, 15-minute
6950711 4 14
Camarillo
W Ventura Blvd & Springville St
Camarillo, CA 93010
Inquiry Number: 6950711.8
April 21, 2022
EDR Building Permit Report
Target Property and Adjoining Properties
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION
About This Report
Executive Summary
Findings
Glossary
Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING

OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC.

BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER

CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.

All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

EDR BUILDING PERMIT REPORT
About This Report
The EDR Building Permit Report provides a practical and efficient method to search building department records for indications of environmental conditions. Generated via a search of municipal building permit records gathered from more than 1,600 cities nationwide, this report will assist you in meeting the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.

Building permit data can be used to identify current and/or former operations and structures/features of environmental concern. The data can provide information on a target property and adjoining properties such as the presence of underground storage tanks, pump islands, sumps, drywells, etc., as well as information regarding water, sewer, natural gas, electrical connection dates, and current/former septic tanks.

ASTM and EPA Requirements
ASTM E 1527-13 lists building department records as a "standard historical source," as detailed in § 8.3.4.7:
“Building Department Records - The term building department records means those records of the local government in which the property is located indicating permission of the local government to construct, alter, or demolish improvements on the property.” ASTM also states that “Uses in the area surrounding the property shall be identified in the report, but this task is required only to the extent that this information is revealed in the course of researching the property itself.”
EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquires (AAI) states: "§312.24: Reviews of historical sources of information. (a) Historical documents and records must be reviewed for the purposes of achieving the objectives and performance factors of §312.20(e) and (f). Historical documents and records may include, but are not limited to, aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, building department records, chain of title documents, and land use records.”
Methodology
EDR has developed the EDR Building Permit Report through our partnership with BuildFax, the nation’s largest repository of building department records. BuildFax collects, updates, and manages building department records from local municipal governments. The database now includes 30 million permits, on more than 10 million properties across 1,600 cities in the United States.

The EDR Building Permit Report comprises local municipal building permit records, gathered directly from local jurisdictions, including both target property and adjoining properties. Years of coverage vary by municipality. Data reported includes (where available): date of permit, permit type, permit number, status, valuation, contractor company, contractor name, and description.

Incoming permit data is checked at seven stages in a regimented quality control process, from initial data source interview, to data preparation, through final auditing. To ensure the building department is accurate, each of the seven quality control stages contains, on average, 15 additional quality checks, resulting in a process of approximately 105 quality control “touch points.”
For more information about the EDR Building Permit Report, please contact your EDR Account Executive at (800) 352-0050.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: SEARCH DOCUMENTATION
A search of building department records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR) on behalf of Kleinfelder, Inc. on Apr 21, 2022.

TARGET PROPERTY
W Ventura Blvd & Springville St
Camarillo, CA 93010

SEARCH METHODS
EDR searches available lists for both the Target Property and Surrounding Properties.

RESEARCH SUMMARY
Building permits identified: YES
The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report.

Camarillo
Year Source TP Adjoining
2022 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department
2021 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department X 2020 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department
2019 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department X 2018 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department
2017 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department X 2016 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department
2015 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department
2014 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department X 2013 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department
2012 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department
2011 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department
2010 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department X 2009 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department
2008 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department
2007 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department
2006 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department
2005 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department
2004 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department
2003 City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department X Name: JurisdictionName
Years: Years
Source: Source
Phone: Phone
6950711- 8 Page 1

BUILDING DEPARTMENT RECORDS SEARCHED
Name: Camarillo
Years: 2003-2022
Source: City of Camarillo, Building and Safety Department, CAMARILLO, CA Phone: (805) 388-5395
Name: Ventura County Unincorporated Area
Years: 1970-2022
Source: County of Ventura, Building and Safety, OXNARD, CA Phone: (805) 654-2771
Name: Huntington Beach
Years: 1964-2022
Source: Huntington Beach, Dept. of Building and Safety, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA Phone: (714) 536-5241
Name: Oxnard
Years: 1970-2022
Source: City of Oxnard, Community Development Department, OXNARD, CA Phone: (805) 385-7407

TARGET PROPERTY FINDINGS

TARGET PROPERTY DETAIL
W Ventura Blvd & Springville St
Camarillo, CA 93010
No Permits Found
6950711- 8 Page 2

ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS

ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL
The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address.

W VENTURA BLVD
415 W VENTURA BLVD
Date: 7/20/2021
Permit Type: BLDG
Description:

Permit Description: BUILDING PERMIT
Work Class: TENANT IMPROVEMENT REMODEL
Proposed Use:

Permit Number: 21-00001366
Status: FINAL INSPECTION COMPLETE
Valuation: $4,500.00
Contractor Company:

Contractor Name: PARADISE CONSTRUCTION INC
Date: 7/20/2021
Permit Type: PLMB
Description:

Permit Description: PLUMBING PERMIT
Work Class: TENANT IMPROVEMENT REMODEL
Proposed Use:

Permit Number: 21-00001366
Status: PERMIT PRINTED
Valuation: $0.00
Contractor Company:

Contractor Name: PARADISE CONSTRUCTION INC
6950711- 8 Page 3
Year Uses Source

ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS
Date: 6/7/2021
Permit Type: BLDG
Description:

Permit Description: BUILDING PERMIT
Work Class: REROOF COMMERCIAL
Proposed Use:

Permit Number: 21-00001154
Status: FINAL INSPECTION COMPLETE
Valuation: $50,375.00
Contractor Company:

Contractor Name: DERRICK'S ROOFING
Date: 6/28/2019
Permit Type: ELEC
Description:

Permit Description: ELECTRICAL PERMIT
Work Class: TENANT IMPROVEMENT REMODEL
Proposed Use:

Permit Number: 19-00001242
Status: PERMIT PRINTED
Valuation: $0.00
Contractor Company:

Contractor Name: PREMIER CONTRACTING GROUP
Date: 1/17/2019
Permit Type: ELEC
Description: (1) ILLUMINATED "TMOBILE" SIGN
Permit Description: ELECTRICAL PERMIT
Work Class: SIGNS ILLUMINATED
Proposed Use:

Permit Number: 19-00000117
Status: FINAL INSPECTION COMPLETE
Valuation: $0.00
Contractor Company:

Contractor Name: G & J NEON SIGNS INC
6950711- 8 Page 4
Year Uses Source

ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS
Date: 12/15/2017
Permit Type: MNP
Description: SAME LOCATION
Permit Description: MECHANICAL PERMIT NO PLCK
Work Class: MECHANICAL NO PLCK
Proposed Use:

Permit Number: 17-00003327
Status: PERMIT PRINTED
Valuation: $1.00
Contractor Company:

Contractor Name: ARTIC MECHANICAL INC
Date: 5/28/2014
Permit Type: ELNP
Description:

Permit Description: ELECTRICAL PERMIT NO PLCK
Work Class: ELECTRICAL NO PLCK
Proposed Use:

Permit Number: 14-00000820
Status: FINAL INSPECTION COMPLETE
Valuation: $0.00
Contractor Company:

Contractor Name: PREMIER CONTRACTING GROUP
Date: 4/1/2014
Permit Type: ELEC
Description:

Permit Description: ELECTRICAL PERMIT
Work Class: SIGNS ILLUMINATED
Proposed Use:

Permit Number: 14-00000444
Status: PERMIT PRINTED
Valuation: $0.00
Contractor Company:

Contractor Name: WEST COAST SIGNS
6950711- 8 Page 5
Year Uses Source

ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS
Date: 3/18/2014
Permit Type: EDCM
Description:

Permit Description: PERMIT W/ENERGY/ACCESS COMMERC
Work Class: TENANT IMPROVEMENT REMODEL
Proposed Use:

Permit Number: 14-00000305
Status: FINAL INSPECTION COMPLETE
Valuation: $20,000.00
Contractor Company:

Contractor Name: CDA, INC
Date: 3/18/2014
Permit Type: PLMB
Description: PLUMBING FOR T.I.

Permit Description: PLUMBING PERMIT
Work Class: TENANT IMPROVEMENT REMODEL
Proposed Use:

Permit Number: 14-00000305
Status: FINAL INSPECTION COMPLETE
Valuation: $0.00
Contractor Company:

Contractor Name: CDA, INC
Date: 8/12/2010
Permit Type: ELNP
Description:

Permit Description: ELECTRICAL PERMIT NO PLCK
Work Class: ELECTRICAL NO PLCK
Proposed Use:

Permit Number: 10-00000860
Status:

Valuation: $0.00
Contractor Company:

Contractor Name: R HELP CONST. CO.
6950711- 8 Page 6
Year Uses Source

ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS
Date: 9/17/2003
Permit Type: EDCM
Description:

Permit Description: PERMIT W/ENERGY/ACCESS COMMERC
Work Class: TENANT IMPROVEMENT REMODEL
Proposed Use:

Permit Number: 03-00025032
Status:

Valuation: $10,000.00
Contractor Company:

Contractor Name: NTR CONSTRUCTION CO INC
6950711- 8 Page 7

GLOSSARY
General Building Department concepts
. ICC: The International Code Council. The governing body for the building/development codes used by all jurisdictions who’ve adopted the ICC guidelines. MOST of the US has done this. Canada, Mexico, and other countries use ICC codes books and guides as well. There are a few states who have added guidelines to the ICC codes to better fit their needs. For example, California has added seismic retrofit requirements for most commercial structures.
. Building Department (Permitting Authority, Building Codes, Inspections Department, Building and Inspections): This is the department in a jurisdiction where an owner or contractor goes to obtain permits and inspections for building, tearing down, remodeling, adding to, re-roofing, moving or otherwise making changes to any structure, Residential or Commercial.
. Jurisdiction: This is the geographic area representing the properties over which a Permitting Authority has responsibility.
. GC: General Contractor. Usually the primary contractor hired for any Residential or Commercial construction work.
. Sub: Subordinate contracting companies or subcontractors. Usually a “trades” contractor working for the GC. These contractors generally have an area of expertise in which they are licensed like Plumbing, Electrical, Heating and Air systems, Gas Systems, Pools etc. (called “trades”). . Journeymen: Sub contractors who have their own personal licenses in one or more trades and work for different contracting companies, wherever they are needed or there is work. .
.

HVAC (Mechanical, Heating & Air companies): HVAC = Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning.

ELEC (Electrical, TempPole, TPole, TPower, Temporary Power, Panel, AMP Change, Power Release):

Electrical permits can be pulled for many reasons. The most common reason is to increase the AMPs of power in an electrical power panel. This requires a permit in almost every jurisdiction. Other commons reason for Electrical permits is to insert a temporary power pole at a new construction site. Construction requires electricity, and in a new development, power has yet to be run to the lot. The temporary power pole is usually the very first permit pulled for new development. The power is released to the home owner when construction is complete and this sometimes takes the form of a Power Release permit or inspection. .
.
“Pull” a permit: To obtain and pay for a building permit. .

CBO: Chief Building Official
Planning Department: The department in the development process where the building /structural plans are reviewed for their completeness and compliance with building codes . Zoning Department: The department in the development process where the site plans are reviewed for their compliance with the regulations associated with the zoning district in which they are situated. . Zoning District: A pre-determined geographic boundary within a jurisdiction where certain types of structures are permitted / prohibited. Examples are Residential structure, Commercial/Retail structures, Industrial/Manufacturing structures etc. Each zoning district has regulations associated with it like the sizes of the lots, the density of the structures on the lots, the number of parking spaces required for certain types of structures on the lots etc.
.
.

PIN (TMS, GIS ID, Parcel#): Property Identification Number and Tax Map System number. .

State Card (Business license): A license card issued to a contractor to conduct business.

Building Inspector (Inspector): The inspector is a building department employee that inspects building construction for compliance to codes.
. C.O.: Certificate of Occupancy. This is the end of the construction process and designates that the owners now have permission to occupy a structure after its building is complete. Sometimes also referred to as a Certificate of Compliance.

GLOSSARY
Permit Content Definitions
. Permit Number: The alphanumerical designation assigned to a permit for tracking within the building department system. Sometimes the permit number gives clues to its role, e.g. a "PL" prefix may designate a plumbing permit.
. Description: A field on the permit form that allows the building department to give a brief description of the work being done. More often than not, this is the most important field for EP’s to find clues to the prior use (s) of the property.
. Permit Type: Generally a brief designation of the type of job being done. For example BLDG-RES, BLDGCOM, ELEC, MECH etc.

Sample Building Permit Data
Date: Nov 09, 2000
Permit Type: Bldg -
New Permit Number: 101000000405
Status: Valuation: $1,000,000.00
Contractor Company: OWNER-BUILDER
Contractor Name:

Description: New one store retail (SAV-ON) with drive-thru pharmacy. Certificate of Occupancy.

Second Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration 2023-4 G Camarillo Costco

APPENDIX G -

WATER IMPACT STUDY
kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and County Road, Suite 700, Orange CA 92868 714.939.1031 Water Impact Study
For
Costco Wholesale – Warehouse and Gas
NEC Springville Drive & West Ventura Boulevard
Camarillo, CA
Prepared For:

City of Camarillo Planning Department
601 Carmen Drive
Camarillo, CA 93010
Prepared By:

Kimley-Horn
1100 W Town and County Road
Suite 700
Orange, CA 92868
April 19, 2023
Kimley-Horn Project Number: 094169102
Water Impact Report
kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and County Road, Suite 700, Orange CA 92868 714.939.1031 Table of Contents
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS..........................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................3 AMARA PROJECT BACKGROUND..............................................................................................................4 EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS ......................................................................................................................4 WATER PRESSURE ...................................................................................................................................7 WATER DEMAND.....................................................................................................................................7 COSTCO FACILITIES ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................8 CONCLUSION...........................................................................................................................................9 Appendices
Appendix A: Water Service Maps
Appendix B: Will Serve Letter
Appendix C: Fire Flow Test
Appendix D: Amara Water System Analysis Report
Appendix E: Fire Sprinkler Site Evaluation Report
Appendix F: Costco Proposed Domestic Water Demand Calculations Appendix G: Costco Proposed Irrigation Demand Calculations Appendix H: Costco Existing Water Demand Data
Appendix I: Developer Allocation Agreement
Appendix J: Amara Project Chain of Ownership
Water Impact Report
kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and County Road, Suite 700, Orange CA 92868 714.939.1031

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report is prepared for the CPD #226M (5) and CUP #422, known as the Costco Wholesale project (Project), in City of Camarillo, County of Ventura. The project proposes to develop a 163,397 square foot building on a 20-acre vacant lot, located on the northeast corner of Springville Drive and West Ventura Boulevard.

Prior to this project, the site had a previously approved use for CPD-226M (3), also known as the Amara project. The Amara project encompassed 45 acres of vacant land and proposed improvements consisted of nineteen buildings of combined retail, Topgolf, and a rough graded lot for a future building. To be in conformance with the Resolution number 2016-89, the Amara project received a total water demand of 40 acre-feet per year (AFY). Due to economic reasons, the project was terminated and did not move forward after CPD approval.

In 2022, Costco partook interest in 20-acres of the vacant lot for a new Costco Wholesale warehouse. This report is to convey how the project will use the previously approved water demand credit from the Amara project to service the new 20-acre project. The Project’s total water demand is 12.50 AFY, encompassing both domestic and landscaping demand. As the owners of the Amara project paid the water demand credit required for the 45-acre site in conformance with Resolution number 2016-89, Costco will receive a proportionate share of the previously approved total water demand of 40 AFY for the Amara project based off the previously approved gross leasing area (GLA).

Water Impact Report
kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and County Road, Suite 700, Orange CA 92868 714.939.1031

INTRODUCTION
The report will review and analyze the Projects total water demand, encompassing domestic and landscaping, in comparison to the Project’s allocated threshold and existing Costco Warehouses within 30-miles of the proposed project. Additionally, the study will also convey how the Project will use the previously approved water demand credit from the Amara project to service the new 20-acre project.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project site is located on the northeast corner of Springville Drive and West Ventura Boulevard in the City of Camarillo (City), County of Ventura. The Project is comprised of 20.09 acres and the proposed development will construct a 163,397 square-foot (SF) warehouse retail building and gas station.

Figure 1: Aerial
The site is bound by the Ventura Freeway (US 101) to the north, light manufacturing zoning district to the south, and CPD zoning districts to the east and west. Aside from the Home Depot property to the east, all other neighboring properties are currently vacant. The site is currently zoned as CPD - Commercial Planned Development.

Water Impact Report
kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and County Road, Suite 700, Orange CA 92868 714.939.1031

AMARA PROJECT BACKGROUND
In 2016, the overall site area of 45-acres was approved for Commercial Retail use under CPD-226M (3), also known as the Amara project. The Amara project encompassed 45-acres of vacant land and proposed improvements consisted of nineteen buildings of combined retail, Topgolf, and a rough graded lot for a future building.

The Amara Will Serve letter and approved Water System Analysis for the 45-acre can be found in Appendix B: Will Serve Letter and Appendix D: Amara Water System Analysis Report. The Amara project went through the Will Serve Letter process with the city and per the Water Availability Letter dated August 18, 2016, the project can be supplied with water from the existing municipal system; refer to Appendix B. The letter confirmed that the existing water lines had sufficient capacity for the Amara project. Additionally, the Amara Water System Analysis Report encompasses water demand calculations for the entire 45-acre site based off the proposed uses, refer to Appendix D for the dated January 15, 2018, report. The Amara project was designed and approved for a total of 40 AFY, the owners of the Amara project paid the city water demand credit requirements for the entire Amara to be in conformance with the resolution number 2016-89.

Due to economic reasons, the Amara project was terminated and did not move forward after CPD approval. In 2022, Costco partook interest in 20-acres of the vacant lot for a new Costco Wholesale warehouse. The Project will receive a proportionate share of the previously approved total water demand of 40 AFY for the Amara project based off the previously approved gross leasing area (GLA) of 499,000 SF.

EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS
Existing water lines within the City of Camarillo are operated and maintained by the City’s Department of Public Works. The site is currently serviced by a 12-inch PVC water main located north of the Ventura Boulevard centerline.

The existing water system adjacent to the Project site is based on as-builts obtained from the City and is shown below; refer to Appendix A: Water Service Maps. As part of the West Ventura Boulevard project, several laterals were tapped from the main line as possible points of connections to the proposed site.

In addition, 3 fire hydrants were installed adjacent to the Project site within the public right-of-way.

Upon discussion with city staff, there is no history of existing water usage on this site as the site is not serviced or metered, therefore the existing AFY used is zero.

Water Impact Report
kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and County Road, Suite 700, Orange CA 92868 714.939.1031 Figure 2: Water Service Map D-12
Water Impact Report
kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and County Road, Suite 700, Orange CA 92868 714.939.1031 Figure 3: Water Service Map E-12
Water Impact Report
kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and County Road, Suite 700, Orange CA 92868 714.939.1031

WATER PRESSURE
Based on the Project’s fire flow analysis performed by WJE and the fire flow test acquired from the City, the water distribution system will be capable of supplying flow and pressure as shown in Table 1: Water Supply Pressure; refer to Appendix C: Fire Flow Test. Per local fire authority, the flow test requires a 10 percent reduction factor.

Table 1: Water Supply Pressure
Static Pressure
(psi)
Residual Pressure
(psi)
Flow at Residual
Pressure
(gpm)
Effective Point
Measured 100 90 1461 Ventura Blvd
Reduction (10%) 90 80 1461 Ventura Blvd
The City water supply is adequate to meet the required hydrant fire flow of 2,000 gallons per minute (gpm) at each hydrant and fire sprinkler demand. A water storage tank and fire booster pump will not be required for the Project.

WATER DEMAND
Proposed water demand calculations encompass domestic and landscaping provided by the Costco Development plumbing engineer and landscape architect. The proposed water demands are shown in Table 2: Water Demand Calculations.

Table 2: Water Demand Calculations
Costco (Proposed)
Domestic Demand 10.24 AFY
Landscape Demand 2.26 AFY
Total Demand 12.50 AFY
Costco domestic water demand is 10.24 AFY based on the warehouse being open 360 days a year with a required demand of 9,142 gallons per day, refer to Appendix F: Costco Domestic Water Demand Calculations, for detailed information. Landscape water demand is at 2.26 AFY based on the required demand of 1,275 gallons per day (depending on the season), refer to Appendix G: Costco Irrigation Demand Calculation, for detailed information.

The Amara project was previously approved for 40 AFY based on the entitled 499,000 SF GLA. Based on the entitled GLA, Costco will be allocated 32.74% of the proportionate share (163,397/499,000) in relation to square footage. Applying this to the 40-gallon acre yard threshold, 13.10 AFY is allocated for Costco use.

Water Impact Report
kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and County Road, Suite 700, Orange CA 92868 714.939.1031 As shown in Table 2, Costco’s total proposed water demand is less than what is allocated for the site, 0.60 AFY less than the assigned 13.10 AFY threshold. Refer to Appendix I for the Developers Allocation Agreement for 13.10 AFY and Refer to Appendix J for Amara Project Chain of Ownership. The City of Camarillo Water Resources department has confirmed the site does not have any existing water use, either domestic or irrigation purposes, due to its vacant use. In such, the proposed water service for the Project will be served off Ventura Boulevard from an existing 8” and 12” water lateral.

COSTCO FACILITIES ANALYSIS
Water demand data from 5 existing Costco sites within a 30-mile radius of the proposed project location was collected; refer to Appendix H: Costco Existing Water Demand Data. The existing water demands are shown in Table 3: Existing Water Demand Data.

Proposed water demand as shown in Table 2: Water Demand Calculations is projected on the lower end of existing totals, as shown in Table 3. The anticipated domestic demand is 10.24 AFY and anticipated landscape demand is 2.26 AFY, making it the lowest demand when compared to existing data.

Table 3: Existing Water Demand Data
Building SF Condenser Type Domestic Landscape Total
Existing Warehouse
Rancho Cucamonga - Water Cooled 15.9 8.1 24.0
Oxnard 145,301 Water Cooled 12.9 7.5 20.4
Simi Valley 136,360 Water Cooled 14.3 4.4 18.7
Westlake Village 136,398 Adiabatic 8.8 7.6 16.4
Woodland Hills* 154,626 Adiabatic 11.1 - 11.1
Proposed Warehouse
Camarillo 163,397 Adiabatic 10.24 2.26 12.5
*Note: No meter marked between Irrigation and Domestic
Domestic Demand Analysis
For the anticipated domestic demand of 10.24 AFY, the warehouse will use an adiabatic condenser for refrigeration, which aids the warehouse in proposing a lower domestic demand than existing warehouses, as shown in Table 3. Rancho Cucamonga, Oxnard, and Simi Valley use water cooled condensers for the warehouse refrigeration system. This type of condenser requires the consistent use of water to reject heat from the exterior. As such, the domestic demand for these warehouses is higher by 5.7 to 4.0 AFY.

Westlake Village and Woodland Hill use adiabatic condensers for the warehouse refrigeration system. This type of condenser uses air to reject heat to the exterior, except when the exterior temperature exceeds 80 - 85 F. When temperatures reach anything above 80 - 85 F the condenser will Water Impact Report
kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and County Road, Suite 700, Orange CA 92868 714.939.1031 begin to use some water to assist in rejecting the heat to the exterior. Since the percentage of time over an entire year the exterior temperatures exceed this range is very small, this type of condenser uses a significantly less amount of water. As such, the domestic demand for warehouses using the adiabatic condensers is lower by 7.10 AFY when comparing Rancho Cucamonga with a 15.9 AFY with Westlake Village with 8.8 AFY, as shown in Table 3. The refrigeration design for the Project will utilize an adiabatic condenser, allowing domestic demand to be at 10.24 AFY. See Appendix F: Costco Proposed Domestic Water Demand Calculations for a detail breakdown.

Landscape Demand Analysis
For the anticipated landscape demand of 2.26 AFY, the site will use point source irrigation, placing irrigation water at the root ball of the proposed plant material. This site will use low water use shrubs and ground covers per State of California’s WUCOLS designation for plant material in Camarillo. Trees and shrubs are separated to their own irrigation circuits to maximize the ability to only provide the amount of water required for healthy plant life while encouraging deep root growth. The irrigation control system will be state of the art and utilize all the features designated in a “SMART” control system such as weather sensors, moisture sensors, and run time adjustments based on environmental conditions. A substantial amount of the landscape area has non irrigated rock and decomposed granite, which are eco friend as well as water and budget conscious.

In comparison to the existing warehouses, as shown in From Table 3, 2.24 AFY is the lowest landscaping demand, this delta is due to the existing warehouses not using low water use options. Costco has implemented an irrigation water reduction program for all warehouses. Most existing warehouses are in the process of transforming the current landscape areas to low water use and changing out old spray irrigation to drip or efficient irrigation equipment. The Camarillo site will not be a retrofit but a new landscape installation where all the equipment for the irrigation design will be matched for the most efficient use of water through irrigation and thus a dramatic savings in water uses annually. These projections are feasible based on the warehouse model selected for this site. This site implements several water saving practices and features inside/outside the warehouse, to meet the designated 13.10 AFY.

CONCLUSION
The Amara project previously proposed a total water demand of 40 AFY based on the approved 499,000 SF GLA. Costco is allocated 32.74% of the proportionate share (163,397/499,000), 13.10 AFY from the approved 40 AFY. The project requires 12.50 AFY, which falls within the allocated allowance. Due to the change of use, the proposed occupancy load for the Project is significantly less than what was previously approved and allotted for the site. This reduces the role in the overall water demand and ultimate impact to the city municipal water system. From the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that the public water system has sufficient capacity to supply the proposed development.

The Owners of the Amara project paid the water demand credit for the entire site in conformance with Resolution number 2016-89. The proposed water demand for the Project is less than what was allotted and paid for through the City’s water demand offset program. Per Resolution number 2016-90, the portion of water demand less than what was anticipated shall be used as a credit to the Project.

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and County Road, Suite 700, Orange CA 92868 714.939.1031

APPENDIX A

WATER SERVICE MAPS
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
¬% ¬%
¬%
¬%
¬%
¬%
¬%
±
±
±
±
±
± ±
± ±
±
F!Ñ
±
"
F!Ñ
± ±
"
±
±
±
±
" " " " " Ñ " " "
" F!
"
F!Ñ " " "
"
" "
"
"
" "
" "
"
"
" " " "
"
"
±
"¥
fä
¥"
¥"
fä
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
' !
'
!
'
!
' !
'
!
' !
'
!
'
!
' !
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
' !
'
!
'!
' !
'
!
'
!
'
!
' !
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
' !
'
!
' !
'
)\"
)\"
)\"
)\"
)\"
)\"
)\"
6" B.O.
6" B.O.
2" A.V.
2" A.V.
6" A.V.

S 101 FWY

W VENTURA BL

W VENTURA BL

SPRINGVILLE DR

CALLE RIOJA (PVT)
12" PVC
12" PVC
10" PVC 8" PVC
10" PVC
8" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
10" PVC
10" PVC
10" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
12" PVC
10" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
54" RCP
54" RCP
54" RCP
592
C-14655
C-14657
C-14654
C-14654 C-14654
C-14654
C-14655
C-14655
C-14655
C-14655
C-14654
C-14655
C-14657
C-14657
C-14680
C-14680
C-14680
C-14681
C-14655
C-14654
C-14655
C-14656 C-14656
C-14680
C-14681
C-15205BM
C-15205BK
C-14788
C-14788
C-14789
(2009)
(2009) (2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009) (2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2009)
(2011)
(2011)
(2010)
(2010)
(2010)
CL200
CL200
CL200 CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200 CL200
C900
C900
D12-100
D12-101
D12-102
D12-103
D12-104
D12-105
D12-106
D12-107
D12-109 D12-108
D12-110
D12-111
D12-112
D12-113
D12-114
D12-115 D12-116
D12-117
D12-118
D12-119
D12-120
D12-121
D12-122
D12-123
D12-124
D12-125
D12-126
D12-127
D12-128 D12-129
D D12-130 12-131
D12-132 D12-133
D12-134
D12-135
D12-136
D12-137
D12-138
D12-139
D12-140
D12-141
D12-142
D12-143
D12-144
D12-145 D12-146
D12-147
D12-148
D12-150
D12-149
D12-250
D12-251
D12-252
D12-253
D12-254 D12-255
D12-256
D12-257
D12-258
D12-259
D12-260
D12-261
D12-262
D12-263
D12-264
D12-265 D12-500
D12-501
D12-400
D12-401
D12-402
THIS MAP WAS CREATED BY THE CITY OF CAMARILLO GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM, WHICH IS DESIGNED AND OPERATED SOLELYFOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CITY AND RELATED PUBLIC AGENCIES. THE CITY DOES NOT WARRANT THE ACCURACY OF THIS MAP,AND NO DECISION INVOLVING A RISK OF ECONOMIC LOSS OR PHYSICAL INJURY SHOULD BE MADE IN RELIANCE THEREON. C-12 D-12 D-12 SCALE: 1" = 200'
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION WATER ATLAS MAP CITY OF CAMARILLO O AUGUST 2018 E-12
D-11
D-13

THIS MAP WAS CREATED BY THE CITY OF CAMARILLO GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM, WHICH IS DESIGNED AND OPERATED SOLELY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CITY AND RELATED PUBLIC AGENCIES. THE CITY DOES NOT WARRANT THE ACCURACY OF THIS MAP,AND NO DECISION INVOLVING A RISK OF ECONOMIC LOSS OR PHYSICAL INJURY SHOULD BE MADE IN RELIANCE THEREON. "¥
± ±
"
" "
" ÎÍ$
³
!
'
W !
"
!
'
!
'
b
"
!
'
fä
<"K =
E12-900 E12-111
E12-401
2" A.V.
12" CMLCS ABANDONED
12" ACP
DETAIL "A"
SEE DETAIL "A"
12" STL
12x8
!.G !.G
!.G
!.G
G.!
!.G
!.G
!.G
!.G
!.G
!.G
!.G !.G
G.!
!.G
!.G
G.!
G.!
!.G
G G!. !.

G!.
!.G
!.G
!.G
!.G
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
G.!
ÎÍ$
³
%¬
¬%
¬%
%¬
%¬
"a
%¬
%¬
%¬
%¬
%¬
%¬
%¬
¬%
%¬
%¬
%¬ %¬ %¬
%¬
%¬
%¬
%¬
%¬ %¬ %¬
¬%
¬%
¬%
¬%
a"
¬%
a"
¬%
¬%
a"
¬%
!
W
F!Ñ
F!Ñ
b
b
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
"
"
"
"
" " "
"
"
"
" " " " " "
"
"
"
" "
" "
" "
"
"
"
" "
"
" " "
" "
" " " " " "
" "
"
"
"
"
" " "
" " "
"
"
" "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" "
" "
)
) )
)
) )
) )
)
"
"
ÑF!
" " "
" "
" "
) ) " "
"
" " " " "
" "
"
"
±
±
±
±
±
±
b )
) "
"
"
±
" " "
"
"
"
±
"
"
"
" "
"
"¥
"¥
"¥
"¥
"¥
¥"
¥"
"¥
äf
fä
fä
fä
fä
fä
äf
fä
äf
äf
fä
fä
äf
"¥
fä
fä
"¥
É&
É&
&É
!
'
!
' !
'
!
'
!
' !
'
!
' !
' !
'
!
' !
'
!
'
! '!
!
' '
! !
' '
!
'
!
' !
'
!
' !
'
'!
!
' '!
!
'
'! !
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
'!
!
' !
'
!
'
!
'
'!
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
' !
'
!
'
!
!
'
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
' ! !
' ' !
' !
'
!
' !
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
' !
'
!
'
'!
!
'
'!
!
' '!
!
' !
'
!
' '! !
' !
' !
'
!
'
! '!
'
! '!
'
!
'
!
'
!
' '!
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
'!
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
' !'
!
'
!
' !
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
!
'
"\)
"\)
"\)
"\)
"\)
"\)
"\)
"\)
"\)
"\)
)\"
)\"
)\" )\"
"\)
)\"
)\"
)"\
"=
K <
<"K =
E12-900
1" B.O.
2" B.O.
2" B.O.
1" B.O.
1" B.O.
2" B.O.
2" B.O.
2" B.O.
1" B.O.
2" B.O.
2" B.O.
6" B.O.
6" B.O.
2" B.O.
2" B.O.
1" A.V.
1" A.V.
1" A.V.
1" A.V.
1" A.V.
1" A.V.
1" A.V.
1" A.V.
2" A.V.

OVERLAND RD
S 101 FWY

S LAS POSAS RD
S 101 FWY
LAS POSAS ON 101 SB RAMP
N 101 FWY
N 101 FWY

W VENTURA BLVD
N 101 FWY
S 101 FWY

OVERLAND RD
LAS POSAS ON 101 NB RAMP
101 SB OFF LAS POSAS RAMP

W VENTURA BLVD
LAS POSAS ON 101 NB RAMP

TOWN CENTER EAST (PVT)
12" PVC
12" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC
12" PVC 12" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
12" CMLCS
16" ACP 16" ACP
12" CMLCS 12" CMLCS
12" CMLCS
16" ACP 12" ACP
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC 8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
10" PVC
10" PVC
12" PVC
12" DIP
12" PVC
8" PVC
12" PVC
12" DIP
8" PVC
8" PVC
10" PVC
12" PVC
8" PVC
12" PVC
16" ACP
54" RCP
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
163
108
191 149 107
300
121
225
375
415
401
135
275
309
317
351
243
209
259
291
C-8645
C-6567
C-8653
C-8653
C-8650
C-8650
C-8650
C-8648
C-8647
C-8647
C-8648
C-8645
C-8645
C-8645
C-8649
C-8652
C-8646
C-4548 C-4548
C-4549 C-811 C-811
C-4550
C-811
C-8652
C-8649
C-8651
C-8651
C-8649 C-8650
C-8653 C-8650
C-8653
C-8653
C-12106
C-12107
C-12106
C-12108
C-12108
C-12105
C-12106
C-12108
C-8651
C-14654
C-14654
C-6567
C-12108
C-10475
C-4549
C-14788
C-15906
C-12267 C-12267
(1997)
(1991)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1985)
(1985)
(1985)
(1974)
(1974)
(1985)
(1974)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997) (1997)
(1997) (1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(1997)
(2003)
(2003)
(2003)
(2003)
(2003)
(2003)
(2003)
(2003)
(2003)
(1997)
(2009)
(2009)
(1991)
(1999)
(1985)
(2010)
(2016)
(2002)
(2002)
CL200
CL150
CL150
CL200
CL150
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL150
CL150
CL150
CL150
CL150
CL150 CL150
CL150
CL150
CL150 CL150
C
CL150 L150
CL150
CL150
CL150
CL150
CL150
CL150
CL150 CL150
CL150
CL150
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL51
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL51
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL200
CL150
CL200
CL150
CL150
CL150
CL150
8"x6"
12"x10"
E12-198 E12-199
E12-175
E12-174
E12-183
E12-185
E12-187
E12-186
E12-190
E12-191
E12-189
E12-192
E12-193
E12-195
E12-194
E12-200 E12-201
E12-197
E12-182
E12-171 E12-177 E12-178
E12-146
E12-145
E12-142
E12-144
E12-125
E12-123
E12-122
E12-143
E12-120
E12-118
E12-107 E12-104
E12-101
E12-103
E12-124
E12-126 E12-127
E12-110
E12-109
E12-128
E12-130 E12-131
E12-152
E12-151 E12-154
E12-155
E12-150
E12-158
E12-160
E12-159
E12-162
E12-165
E12-163
E12-149
E12-153
E12-161
E12-164
E12-141
E12-140
E12-148
E12-184
E12-108
E12-105
E12-202
E12-196
E12-188
E12-112
E12-113
E12-114
E12-115
E12-117
E12-121
E12-134
E12-133
E12-135
E12-132
E12-138
E12-136
E12-139
E12-167
E12-172 E12-179
E12-173
E12-166
E12-137
E12-176
E12-168
E12-180
E12-169
E12-156
E12-157
E12-181
E12-116
E12-147
E12-170 E12-204
E12-205
E12-203
E12-206
E12-207
E12-208
E12-209
E12-129
E12-119
E12-210
E12-211
E12-212
E12-214
E12-215 E12-217
E12-213
E12-216

ABANDONED

ABANDONED ABANDONED
20" Steel Casing
12" Waste Discharge Line
Concrete Encasement

ABANDONED
WELL D
Line Continues
E12-276 E12-277
E12-267
E12-269
E12-274
E12-275
E12-260
E12-252
E12-259
E12-253
E12-254
E12-261
E12-263
E12-268
E12-258
E12-271
E12-250
E12-273
E12-251
E12-255
E12-256 E12-257
E12-265
E12-272
E12-262
E12-264
E12-266
E12-270
E12-278
E12-279
E12-281
E12-281
E12-281
E12-280
E12-511
E12-503
E12-510
E12-507
E12-514
E12-508
E12-513
E12-515
E12-506
E12-505
E12-509
E12-501
E12-502
E12-512
E12-504
E12-408
E12-405
E12-409
E12-410
E12-404
E12-403
E12-406
E12-407
E12-402
10 ' CL
10 ' CL
20 ' CL
20 ' CL
20 ' CL
20 '
20 '
20 '
20 '
20 '
20 '
20 '
20 '
20 '
20 '
20 '
20 '
20 '
O
D-12
E-11
F-12
E-13
E-12 WATER ATLAS MAPS CITY OF CAMARILLO AUGUST 2018 E-12 SCALE: 1" = 200'

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and County Road, Suite 700, Orange CA 92868 714.939.1031

APPENDIX B

WILL SERVE LETTER
City of Camarillo
Department of Public Works
601 Carmen Drive, Camarillo, CA 93010
Office: 805.388.5340- Fax: 805.388.5387
August 18, 2016
Arturo Sneider
President
Primestor Development, Inc.
201 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90012
RE: Water Availability Letter — Amara, CPD-226M(3)
This letter confirms that upon compliance with the City of Camarillo (City) Water Conservation Ordinance (Chapter 14.12 of the Camarillo Municipal Code), potable water supply will be made available to the Amara project (the "Project"), CPD-226M(3), a regional commercial center entitled for up to 499,000 square feet of commercial uses located at the southeast corner of Springville Drive and W. Ventura Boulevard.

The Project is eligible to participate in the City's Water Demand Credit Program (Program) as adopted by Resolution No. 2016-89. Eligibility in the Program provides a process for the Project to comply with the requirements for new development as stated in the City's Water Conservation Ordinance and obtain a Water Will-Serve letter from the City. As an Eligible Project under the Program, a Water Will-Serve letter will be issued for the Project in accordance with the Program and upon compliance with all applicable Program requirements.

If you have any questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,
Director of Public Works
c: Alfred Fraijo, Sheppard Mullin
Joe Vacca, Director, Community Development
Tali Tucker, Assistant Director of Public Works/City Engineer Lucie McGovern, Deputy Director of Public Works/Environmental Engineer

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and County Road, Suite 700, Orange CA 92868 714.939.1031

APPENDIX C

FIRE FLOW TEST
Project Name: Costco Warehouse tem PR 414240711 Parcel B Project Address: NW Corner of Ventura Blvd & Santiago St. City: Camarillo

VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
165 DURLEY AVENUE
CAMARILLO, CA 93010
www.vcfd.orq
Office: 805-389-9738 Fax: 805-388-4356
IP" FIRE PREVENtION FORM 625

FIRE-FLOW VERIFICATION

SECTION I - PROJECT INFORMATION
(To Be Completed by Applicant)

SECTION II - INFORMATION ON FIRE-FLOW AVAILABILITY
(To Be Completed by Water Purveyor)
System Information:

Water Purveyor: City of Camarillo
Size & Location of Main: 12 Inch Ventura Blvd. Distance to Parcel: 15 Feet Size of Reservoir Serving Test Hydrants: 4 Million Gallons Hydrant Information: 1
Location of Residual Hydrant: Ventura Blvd. South of Parcel Distance to Parcel: * 15 Feet 1 Location of Flow Hydrant: Ventura Blvd. South of Parcel Distance to Parcel: * 12 Feet , Type: Wet size: 6 Inch # of Outlets: 1 4" 2 2 'A"
" Distance to parcel shall be measured along the vehicular access Test Result Information: 1
Method Used to Obtain Results: Hydraulic Model n Flow Test k.

Date of Test: 3/24/2022 Time of Test: 1000 V AM H PM
Static PSi: 100 Residual PSI: 90 orifice: 2.5 Pitot: 76 Observed GPM: 1,461 Calculated GPM @ 20 psi: 4,491 Capacity Duration: . hrs I have witnessed and/or reviewed this water flow information and by personal knowledge and/or on-site observation certify that the above information is correct.

Name: Andy Flores
Signature: Date: 3/24/2022
Title' Assistant Water Superintendent Company: City of Camarillo Phone: (805) 383-5643
Private on-site water system proposed. Separate plan submittal required.

Water purveyor approves use of private water system. (Purveyor signature required above) Fire District Record Number:

May 22, 2020 Fire-flow Verification 625-1

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and County Road, Suite 700, Orange CA 92868 714.939.1031

APPENDIX D

AMARA PROJECT WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS REPORT

WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
For
CPD-226M(3)
Amara
NEC Springville Drive & West Ventura Boulevard
Camarillo, CA 93010
Prepared for:

Springville Camarillo Owner, LLC
201 S Figueroa St., Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 223-5500
Prepared by:

DRC Engineering, Inc.
160 S. Old Spring Road, Suite 210
Anaheim, CA 92808
(714) 685-6860
Greg Cooke, P.E.

___________ _______________
Gregory R. Cooke RCE 39478 Exp. 12-31-19
Prepared on: January 15, 2018
DRC Project No. 13-285
Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx 1/15/2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Executive Summary 1
General 1
Study Area 1
System Conditions 1
Existing Condition 1
Proposed Condition 1
Water Impact Analysis 2
Methodology 3
Study Area Defined 3
Approach 3
Conclusions 5
Summary 5
Appendix
A. Location Map
B. Water Flow Requirements
C. Table 1 – Water Usage on Current Topgolf Locations
Table 2 – Domestic Water Demand for Buildings
Table 3 – Irrigation Water Demand
D. Documents from plumbing engineer (Henderson Engineers Inc.) E. Documents from landscape architect (Ridge Landscape Architects) F. WaterCad Analysis Output
G. WaterCad Analysis Node and Pipe Layout
H. Resolution No. 2016-89
Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx Page 1 Executive Summary
General
This report is prepared for CPD-226M(3), known as Amara, in City of Camarillo, County of Ventura. The purpose of this study is to determine the adequacy of the proposed water line serving the proposed buildings.

This report is to determine if 20 psi is available with fire flow of approximately 4,000 gallons per minute for a minimum 4 hour duration in the proposed water line serving the proposed buildings under maximum daily demand conditions per City of Camarillo’s standards. A minimum flow of 2,000 gallons per minute shall be provided from any one hydrant per condition outlined by Ventura County Fire Protection District included as Appendix B.

Study Area
The project is a proposed shopping center. The site is located on the northeast side of Springville Drive and West Ventura Boulevard in City of Camarillo, County of Ventura. The site is approximately 45 acres and is currently vacant. The proposed project will construct nineteen buildings consisting of a combination of retail, restaurant, and banks along with parking areas, a Topgolf, and a rough-graded lot with a future building.

System Conditions
Existing Condition:

The site is currently serviced by a 12-inch waterline within the existing West Ventura Boulevard per Camarillo Drawing No.’s C-14653 to C-14657. This mainline has several laterals that service the proposed site that were installed as part of the West Ventura Boulevard project. There is a 10-inch existing water line within the Home Depot center that services the site from the northeast corner of the site along the 101 Freeway.

Proposed Condition:

The proposed water system will be public 12” PVC lines. The proposed system will be connected to the existing system at 5 locations:
• Connecting to the existing 12” PVC water main in West Ventura Boulevard via an existing 12” PVC lateral in the proposed westerly driveway access off West Ventura Boulevard • Connecting to the existing 12” PVC water main in West Ventura Boulevard via an existing 12” PVC lateral in the proposed easterly driveway access off West Ventura Boulevard • Connecting to the existing 12” PVC water main in West Ventura Boulevard via an existing 8” PVC lateral behind the buildings in the southeast portion of the site Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx Page 2 • Connecting to the existing 12” PVC water main in West Ventura Boulevard via an existing 10” PVC lateral behind the buildings in the southeast portion of the site • Connecting to the existing 12” PVC water main at the northeast corner of the site, in the adjacent property to the east
Water Impact Analysis
The Owners of the Amara project have paid the city the water demand credit requirements for the entire Amara in conformance with resolution number 2016-89 based on a 40 AFY demand. If the final water demand of the Amara project is greater than the anticipated 40 AFY water demand, the city’s water demand offset program adopted by resolution number 2016-90 must be met for that portion of water demand which is greater than the anticipated water demand of 40 AFY, prior to the city of Camarillo issuing a will-serve letter for new potable water service connections. Resolution No. 2016-90 has been added as Appendix H in this report for reference.

Below is the summary of the water demand for the project.

Paseo Camino Real Amara (Entitled) Amara (Design)
Entitled Building Area Up to 499,000 sf Up to 499,000 sf Up to 499,000 sf Proposed Building Area 454,646 sf 487,239 sf 352,371 sf Landscaped Area 287,794 sf 382,221 sf 209,451 sf
Water Demand 53.7 AFY 30.5 AFY 40.0 AFY
Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx Page 3 Methodology
Study Area Defined
The entire 45 acres of the study area will be for commercial use in the proposed condition.

Approach
The fire flow test was performed by City of Camarillo Water Department with Test date of June 16, 2015. A copy of the test is included in Appendix B of this report. The fire flow was simulated using Bentley WaterCad v8i software with 2 alternatives: Each simulation runs 2 fire hydrants simultaneously for a total of 4,000 gallons per minute (gpm) per Ventura County Fire Protection District criteria dated October 27, 2015. The required fire flow shall also be achieved at no less than 20-psi residual pressure. Two most hydraulically remote fire hydrants are selected in each scenario to determine if the minimal residual pressure of 20-psi is available at the selected hydrants. Fire flow requirements from Ventura County Fire Protection District are also included in Appendix B.

Per City of Camarillo’s standards, the Hazen-Williams C is 120 for pipe diameter smaller than or equal to 10” and 130 for 12” diameter pipe or greater. City of Camarillo requires a peaking factor of 2, which is accounted for in the last column in both Table 2 and Table 3 included in Appendix C.

Due to the early stage on the design of Topgolf, the actual water demand is not available. However, Topgolf provided water demand data on two of their current locations in Scottsdale, AZ, and Centennial, CO. Based on the comparison on average annual temperature and average annual rainfall between the two geographic locations and Camarillo, it shows that Camarillo falls approximately in the middle between two locations.

Location Average Annual Temperature Average Annual Rainfall Scottsdale, AZ 72°F 10.3”
Centennial, CO 51°F 17”
Camarillo, CA 61° 15.2”
Therefore, the average of the water usage between the two Topgolf locations was used for the analysis. See Table 1 in Appendix C for calculations.

The domestic water demand for each building, except for Buildings 14 and 15, is provided by the plumbing engineer as included in Appendix D. The domestic water demands for Buildings 14 and 15 are not currently available but the owner of the project indicated that Buildings 14 and 15 will have similar usage as Building 3A, hence the water demands for Buildings 14 and 15 were ratio based on the building square footage verses the buildings square footage of Building 3A. This calculation as well as the domestic water demand determined by Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx Page 4 the plumbing engineer is included as Table 2 in Appendix C. The domestic water demand for each building is added at each domestic water connection to the onsite water system.

The irrigation water demand for each proposed irrigation meter was determined by the landscape architect as stated in the documents in Appendix D and is summarized in Table 3 in Appendix C. The irrigation water demand for each irrigation meter is added at each irrigation connection to the onsite water system.

Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx Page 5 Conclusions
Summary
In Scenario 1, hydrants at Junction J-75 and J-76 were run simultaneously. With a domestic water demand of

12.06 gpm, an irrigation water demand of 204 gpm, and a fire water demand of 2,000 gpm at each of the two selected hydrants, 20-psi residual pressure is available at the hydrants at Junction J-75 and J-76.

In Scenario 2, hydrants at Junction J-46 and J-47 were run simultaneously. With a domestic water demand of

12.06 gpm, an irrigation water demand of 204 gpm, and a fire water demand of 2,000 gpm at each of the two selected hydrants, 20-psi residual pressure is available at the hydrants at Junction J-46 and J-47.

From the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that the size of the onsite water system is adequate to provide enough pressure to the proposed buildings and fire hydrants. Results of the analysis are included in Appendix E.

The project previously proposed (Paseo Camino Real) had a total proposed building area of 454,646 sf and had a water demand of 53.7 AFY. The current Amara project has a total proposed building area of 352,371 sf and a water demand of 40.0. Below is a comparison between the two projects:

Paseo Camino Real Amara (Entitled) Amara (Design)
Entitled Building Area Up to 499,000 sf Up to 499,000 sf Up to 499,000 sf Proposed Building Area 454,646 sf 487,239 sf 352,371 sf Landscaped Area 287,794 sf 382,221 sf 209,451 sf
Water Demand 53.7 AFY 30.5 AFY 40.0 AFY
In conclusion, the water demand for the proposed Amara project is reduced by 13.7 AFY from the Paseo Camino Real project.

Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx Appendix A
Vicinity Map
Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx Appendix B
Water Flow Requirements
Hydrant Flow Test Report
Test Date 6/17/2015 Test Time 0:800
Location Tested by
West Ventura Blvd. Camarillo Tom McKnett
Notes Read Hydrant
93 psi static pressure
87 psi residual pressure
hydrant elevation
Flow Hydrant(s)
Pitot
Outlet Elev Size C Pressure Flow
#1 2.50 090 85 1548 gpm
Flow Graph
100
80 60
psi
40 20
0 5975.2 gpm at 20 psi
1 1 1. 1 1 1.
0 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500
gpm
Created with the free hydrant flow test program from wwwigneusinc.com Ventura County Fire Protection District

MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 27, 2015
TO: Joe Vacca, Case Planner
AGENCY: Ventura County Planning Dept.

FROM: John Dodd, Fire Inspector
PROJECT NUMBER: CPD 226M (3), Amara Regional Shopping Center APPLICANT: Springville Camarillo Owner. LLC
LOCATION: Ventura Blvd, Camarillo
DESCRIPTION: Architectural Changes
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE ASSIGNED TO THIS PROJECT.

Fire Department Clearance- Applicant shall obtain VCFD Form #126 "Requirements for Construction" prior to obtaining a building permit for any new structures or additions to existing structures.

Phasing Plan- Applicant shall submit a phasing plan to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction.

Building Plan Review- Building plans of all A, E, I, H occupancies shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Fire District for review and approval prior to obtaining a building permit.

Commercial Shopping Center Access Width- A minimum on site access width of 25 feet for two way traffic with off street parking shall be provided. Where one way traffic is proposed, a minimum 20 foot access width shall be provided for fire apparatus access.

Restaurant Drive Thru Access - Drive thru restaurant access may be installed as proposed with a minimum 12 foot access width.

Aerial Fire Apparatus Access, Commercial or Industrial. Buildings or portions of buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet (9144 mm) in height above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access shall be provided with approved fire apparatus access roads / driveways with a minimum clear width of 30 feet and capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located a minimum of 15 feet (4572 mm) and a maximum of 30 feet (9144 mm) from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building as approved by the Fire District. Buildings exceeding 50,000 square feet shall have required access routes along a minimum of two (2) entire sides of the building. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located within the aerial fire apparatus access road(s) driveway(s) and yard area between the required access and the building. Trees planted between the access route and the building shall be spaced so there will be a minimum 30 feet separation between canopies at maturity. Parking is prohibited on the required width of the road / driveway.

Access Road Location- The access / driveway shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building and shall be in accordance with Fire District access standards.

Turning Radius- The access road shall be of sufficient width to allow for a 40 foot outside turning radius at all turns in the road.

Vertical Clearance- All access roads / driveways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13 6").

Construction Access- Prior to combustible construction, an all-weather access road / driveway suitable for use by a 20 ton Fire District vehicle shall be installed.

Construction Access- Prior to combustible construction, all utilities located within the access road and the first lift of the access road pavement shall be installed. A minimum 20 foot clear width shall remain free of obstruction during any construction activities within the development once combustible construction starts_
Fire Lanes- Prior to occupancy, all fire lanes shall be posted NO PARKING-FIRE LANE-TOW AWAY" in accordance with California Vehicle Code, the VCFPD Fire Code and current VCFPD Fire Lane Standards. All signs and or Fire Lane markings shall be within recorded access easements.

Building Address Numbers- Building address numbers, a minimum of 12 inches (12") high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Brass or gold plated numbers shall not be used.

Temporary address numbers shall be installed at the street entrance during construction.

Address Number Plan- A plan shall be submitted to the Fire District for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers_ Suite/Unit Numbers - Address suite numbers, a minimum of 6 - 8 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Brass or gold plated numbers shall not be used. Suite numbers shall be posted at the entrance and at the back of each suite/unit.

Walkways- Approved walkways shall be provided from all building openings to the public way Or fire department access road / driveway.

Accessory Room Door Labeling — All accessory room doors shall be labeled on the doors indicating the use of the room (i.e., Electrical Room, Riser Room, Alarm Panel Inside, Storage, Janitor, etc.)
Fire Sprinklers- All structures shall be provided with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.

Fire Protection System Plans- Plans for all fire protection systems (sprinklers, dry chemical, hood systems, etc.) shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Fire District for review and approval prior to installation. Note: Fire sprinkler systems with 20 or more heads shall be supervised by a fire alarm system in accordance with Fire District requirements.

Fire Alarm System- A fire alarm system shall be installed in all buildings in accordance with California Building and Fire Code requirements.

Fire Alarm Plans- Plans for any fire alarm system shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Fire District for review and approval prior to installation.

Fire Hydrant(s) Required- Fire hydrant(s) shall be provided in accordance with current adopted edition of the VCFPD Fire Code and adopted amendments. On-site fire hydrants may be required as determined by the Fire District. Concrete pads extending 18 inches from the barrel shall be installed.

Fire Hydrant Plan- Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Fire District for placement of fire hydrants. On plans, show existing hydrants within 250 feet of the development. Indicate the type of hydrant, number and size of outlets.

Fire Hydrant Design- Fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standard of the County of Ventura Water Works Manual and the following
a. Each hydrant shall be a 6 inch wet barrel design and shall have (2)_ 4 inch and (1) 2 1/2 inch outlet(s)
b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20-psi residual pressure.
c. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. d. Fire hydrants shall be set back in from the curb face 24 inches on center. e. No obstructions, including walls, trees, light and sign posts, meter, shall be placed within three (3) feet of any hydrant.
f. A concrete pad shall be installed extending 18 inches out from the fire hydrant.
g. Ground clearance to the lowest operating nut shall be between 18 to 24 inches.

Hydrant Location Markers- Prior to occupancy of any structure, blue reflective hydrant location markers shall be placed on the access roads in accordance with Fire District standards. If the final asphalt cap is not in place at time of occupancy, hydrant location markers shall still be installed and shall be replaced when the final asphalt cap in completed.

Fire Flow- The minimum fire flow required shall be determined as specified by the current adopted edition of the VCFPD Fire Code Appendix III-A with adopted Amendments and the applicable Water Manual for the jurisdiction (with ever is more restrictive). Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 4000 gallons per minute at 20 psi for a minimum 4 hour duration. A minimum flow of 2000 gallons per minute shall be provided from any one hydrant. The applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required volume and duration at the project prior to obtaining a building permit.

Trash Dumpster Locations- Commercial trash dumpsters and containers with an individual capacity of 1.5 cubic yards or greater shall not be stored or placed within 5 feet of openings, combustible walls, or combustible roof eave lines unless protected by approved automatic fire sprinklers.

Fire Code Permits- Applicant and I or tenant shall obtain all applicable Fire Code Permits.

Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx Appendix C
Table 1 – Water Usage on Current Topgolf Locations
Table 2 – Domestic Water Demand for Buildings
Table 3 – Irrigation Water Demand
Date
Bldg Meter
(gal)
Irrigation
(gal) Date
Bldg
Meter
Irrigation
(gal)
2015 11/21-12/20 264,000 0
January 315,000 No data 12/21-1/25 318,000 0
February No data No data 1/26-2/23 255,000 0
March 422,000 137,000 2/24-3/28 311,000 0
April 498,000 190,000 3/29-4/25 258,000 0
May 355,900 171,600 4/26-5/25 298,000 32,000
June 624,900 209,400 5/26-6/22 277,000 293,000
July No data No data 6/23-7/23 330,000 352,000
August 613,900 373,400 7/24-8/25 395,000 395,000
September 351,800 255,500 8/26-9/28 333,000 307,000
Octorber 444,700 328,700 9/29-10/25 246,000 164,000
November 479,400 294,200 10/26-11/22 224,000 115,000
Total gal 4,105,600 1,959,800 11/23-12/21 232,000 0
Total days 275 244 Total gal 3,741,000 1,658,000
Average gpm 10.37 5.58 Total days 397 397
Average gpm 6.54 2.90
Average between the two locations to be used for the Topgolf in Camarillo:

Bldg meter (gal) = 3,923,300 = 8.46 gpm
Irrigation (gal) = 1,808,900 = 4.24 gpm
Total demand (gal) = 5,732,200 = 12.69 gpm
(1gpm = 1.61301 AFY) = 20.48 AFY
Total demand is divided equally between 2 water stubs: 6.35 gpm Demand per stub with peaking factor of 2: 12.69 gpm
Scottsdale, AZ Centennial, CO
Table 1 - Water Usage on Current Topgolf Locations
2016
* These two Topgolf facilities are same scale (size) as the Amara project in Camarillo.

Building
Building Square
Footage (sf)
Demand Per
Year (ac-ft) Demand (gpd) Demand (gpm)
Demand with Peaking
Factor of 2 (gpm)
Topgolf* 23,470 20.48 18,280.46 12.69 25.39
2 38,000 3.47 3,098.38 1.79 3.59
3A 5,600 0.08 73.22 0.04 0.08
3B 5,600 0.08 73.22 0.04 0.08
4 11,475 1.12 999.31 0.58 1.16
5 12,320 1.20 1,072.53 0.62 1.24
6/7 32,760 0.48 428.86 0.25 0.50
8/9 23,483 2.29 2,045.31 1.18 2.37
10 8,520 0.15 130.75 0.08 0.15
11/12 22,000 0.32 287.65 0.17 0.33
13A/13B 9,500 0.14 125.52 0.07 0.15
14 6,560 0.09 83.66 0.05 0.10
15 3,783 0.05 48.25 0.03 0.06
16/17/18/20/21 139,300 2.04 1,820.42 1.05 2.11
19 10,000 0.15 130.75 0.08 0.15
Total 352,371 32.14 28,698.29 16.62 33.23
* Topgolf water demand was estimated from Table 1, including irrigation Building 3A building area = 5,600 sf
Building 3A demand per year = 0.08 ac-ft
= 0.000014 ac-ft/sf
Ratio water demand based on square footage of building for Buildings 14 & 15:

Building 14 building area = 6,560 sf
Using the demand per year per square feet ratio for Building 3A:

Building 14 demand per year = Building 14 area x Building 3A demand per year per square feet = 0.09 ac-ft and is converted to gpd in Table 2
Building 15 building area = 3,783 sf
Using the demand per year per square feet ratio for Building 3A:

Building 15 demand per year = Building 15 area x Building 3A demand per year per square feet = 0.05 ac-ft and is converted to gpd in Table 2
See Appendix "D" for domestic water demand calculations for the remaining buildings.

Table 2 - Domestic Water Demand for Buildings
Buildings 14 and 15 have similar usage as Building 3A so the water demand for Buildings 14 and 15 are estimated per calculations below:

Water Meter by
Location*
Estimated Water Use Per
Year (ac-ft)
Estimated Maximum
Demand (gpm)
Demand with Peaking
Factor of 2 (gpm)
Building 2 0.3 14 28
Building 3-13 &
16-21

7.10 75 150
Building 14 0.30 14 28
Building 15 0.18 13 26
Total 7.88 116 232
* Topgolf irrigation is included in Table 2
See Appendix "D" for detailed calculations.

Table 3 - Irrigation Water Demand
Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx Appendix D
Documents from plumbing engineer
(Henderson Engineers Inc.)
August 13, 2015
AMARA
Regional Shopping Center
Camarillo, CA
Water Conservation Statement
The design team recognizes limiting water usage is of upmost importance and is committed to utilizing design best practices for water conservation on the plumbing and mechanical design for this project.

The project team understands sections 14.12.030 – Permanent Water Conservation Measures and 14.12.040 Additional Water Conservation Measures in the City of Camarillo Code of Ordinances. The following water conservation methods will be considered on the project to show compliance with the above ordinances and exceed baseline code requirements.

Executive Summary Table
Plumbing Fixture Design Standard Options % Reduction
Baseline: 2008 T24 Non-Residential Standards 0
Option 1: 2013 CALGreen with Low Flow Urinals 22
Option 2: 2013 CALGreen with Waterless Urinals 32
Option 3: 2013 CALGreen Tier 2 - Waterless Urinals & Lavatory Aerator 35 Option 4: 2013 CALGreen Tier 2 – Waterless Urinals, Aerator, 1.0 gpm Shower Heads 40 The appendices on the following pages provide calculations and standards utilized to establish the indoor building water reduction values in the table above.
• Appendix 1: Water Reduction Calculations

Table – 1 Water Use Baseline Calculation

Table – 2 Water Reduction Calculation with 0.5 gpm Urinal Flush Valves
Table – 3 Water Reduction Calculation with Waterless Urinals
Table – 4 Water Reduction Calculation with 0.35 gpm Lavatory Faucet Replacement Aerator
Table – 5 Water Reduction with 1.0 gpm Shower Heads
• Appendix 2: Occupant load per building.
• Appendix 3: Occupant Load Factor
• Appendix 4: Maximum flow rate of plumbing fixtures
• Appendix 5: Water Use Reduction Worksheet (WS-3)
Sincerely,
Austin Allen, PE, LEED AP
Director of Los Angeles Operations

Appendix 1: Water Reduction Calculations
TABLE 1 - WATER USE BASELINE (WS-1)¹
Fixture Type
Baseline
Flow Rate
(gpm)
Duration
(minutes) Daily Uses Occupants Gallons per Day
Showerheads 2.5 5 1 213 2656.25
Lavatory faucets 2.2 0.25 3 4208 6943.51
Male Female Male Female Male Female
Flushometer valve water closets 1.6 1 1 3 2104 2104 3366.55 10099.65 Urinals 1 1 2 2104 4208.19
¹Table H-1 & Table I Standards for Plumbing Fixtures Title 24 2008 Non residential Manual Rev. 2Q 2010
Total daily basline water use
(BWU) 27274.14

Allowable water use
(BWUx0.80) = 21819.3 GPD

TABLE 2 - WATER USE REDUCTION WITH 0.5 GPM URINAL FLUSH VALVES (WS-3)¹ Fixture Type
Baseline
Flow Rate
(gpm)
Duration
(minutes) Daily Uses Occupants Gallons per Day
Showerheads 1.5 5 1 425 3187.50
Lavatory faucets 0.5 0.25 3 4421 1657.88

Male Female Male Female Male Female
Flushometer valve water closets² 1.12 1 1 3 2210 2210 2475.20 7425.60 Urinals 0.5 1 2 2210 2210.00
¹2013 California Green Building Standards Worksheet (WS-3) Water Use Reduction
Total Daily Water Use
Reduction 16956.18 GPD
²HET (high Efficiency Toilets)

Percent Reduction of water use in gallons per day:
21819.314 - 16956.18 = 4863.1386

4863.1386 ÷ 21819.3 = 22.29 %

TABLE 3 - WATER USE REDUCTION WITH WATERLESS URINALS (WS-3)¹ Fixture Type
Baseline
Flow Rate
(gpm)
Duration
(minutes) Daily Uses Occupants Gallons per Day
Showerheads 1.5 5 1 425 3187.50
Lavatory faucets 0.5 0.25 3 4421 1657.88
Male Female Male Female Male Female
Flushometer valve water closets² 1.12 1 1 3 2210 2210 2475.20 7425.60 Urinals³ 0 1 2
2210

0.00 ¹2013 California Green Building Standards Worksheet (WS-3) Water Use Reduction
Total Daily Water Use
Reduction 14746.18 GPD
²HET (high Efficiency Toilets)
³Waterless Urinals
Percent Reduction of water use in gallons per day: 21819.314 - 14746.18 = 7073.1386

7073.1386 ÷ 21819.3 = 32.42 %

TABLE 4 - WATER USE REDUCTION WITH 0.35 GPM LAVATORY FAUCET REPLACEMENT AERATOR (WS-3)¹ Fixture Type
Baseline
Flow Rate
(gpm)
Duration
(minutes) Daily Uses Occupants Gallons per Day
Showerheads 1.5 5 1 425 3187.50
Lavatory faucets³ 0.35 0.25 3 4421 1160.51
Male Female Male Female Male Female
Flushometer valve water closets² 1.12 1 1 3 2210 2210 2475.20 7425.60 Urinalsº 0 1 2 2210 0.00
¹2013 California Green Building Standards Worksheet (WS-3) Water Use Reduction
Total Daily Water Use
Reduction 14248.81 GPD
²HET (high Efficiency Toilets)

³Replacement Aerator

ºWaterless Urinals

Percent Reduction of water use in gallons per day: 21819.314 - 14248.81 = 7570.5011

7570.5011 ÷ 21819.3 = 34.70 %

TABLE 5 - WATER USE REDUCTION WITH 1.0 GPM SHOWER HEADS (WS-3)¹ Fixture Type
Baseline
Flow Rate
(gpm)
Duration
(minutes) Daily Uses Occupants Gallons per Day
Showerheadsº 1 5 1 425 2125.00
Lavatory faucets³ 0.35 0.25 3 4421 1160.51
Male Female Male Female Male Female
Flushometer valve water closets² 1.12 1 1 3 2210 2210 2475.20 7425.60 Urinals 0 1 2 2210 0.00
¹2013 California Green Building Standards Worksheet (WS-3) Water Use Reduction
Total Daily Water Use
Reduction 13186.31 GPD
²HET (high Efficiency Toilets)
³Replacement Aerator
º1 gpm Shower heads

Percent Reduction of water use in gallons per day: 21819.314 - 13186.31 = 8633.0011

8633.0011 ÷ 21819.3 = 39.57 %

Appendix 2: Occupant Load per Building
TABLE 1 - OCCUPANT LOAD PER BUILDING
Building
No. Area (SF) No. of Floors
Total
Area (SF)
Occupant
Load Factor¹ Occupants Male & Female
1 156427 1 156427 200 782 391
2 42500 2 42500 200 213 106
3 18414 1 18414 200 92 46
4 11473 1 11473 30 382 191
5 11900 1 11900 30 397 198
6 14760 1 14760 200 74 37
7 18000 1 18000 200 90 45
8 15000 1 15000 30 500 250
9 7440 1 7440 30 248 124
10 8520 1 8520 30 284 142
11 10000 1 10000 200 50 25
12 12000 1 12000 200 60 30
13A 4500 1 4500 200 23 11
13B 5000 1 5000 200 25 13
14 6560 1 6560 30 219 109
15 3783 1 3783 200 19 9
16 28000 1 28000 200 140 70
17 20000 1 20000 200 100 50
18 18300 1 18300 200 92 46
19 10000 1 10000 200 50 25
20 32000 1 32000 200 160 80
21 42000 1 42000 200 210 105

TOTAL 4208 2104
¹ From Table A. Occupant Load Factor [DSA-ss & DSA-SS/CC]

Appendix 3: Occupant Load Factor

Appendix 4: Maximum Flow Rate of Plumbing Fixtures

Appendix 5: Water Use Reduction Worksheet
Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx Appendix E
Documents from landscape architect
(Ridge Landscape Architects)

August 11, 2015
AMARA
Regional Shopping Center
Camarillo, California
Landscape Water Conservation Statement
The project team recognizes that water is of limited supply in California and that the landscape and irrigation needs to be designed utilizing best practices for water conservation.

The Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance is currently under revision in response to the Governor’s water mandate Executive Order B-29-15. (Attachment 1) The landscape and irrigation has been designed to comply with the proposed draft of the more restrictive Department of Water Resources Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. (Attachment 2) Maximum Applied Water Allowance and Estimated Total Water Use calculations are included. (Attachment 3)
The baseline allowable water use for this site is outlined in Resolution No. 1443 by the Calleguas Municipal Water District. The site is allowed 150.06 acre feet per year water useage. The landscape irrigation will require

14.602 acre feet of water. The maximum water allowance for landscape irrigation is per year based upon the proposed modifications of the landscape ordinance. The estimated water use for landscape irrigation is 13 per cent below that allowable water use.

The owner has indicated that they are open to additional methods of water conservation including storm water harvesting. This would involve the installation of a subterranean tank with pump, float valve and check valve that would store run-off from rain as a supplemental water source for irrigation. When water is stored in the tank it would switch over from the water meter to the storage tank and pump the water out to the irrigation system.

This would further reduce the water demand for irrigation.

The water conservation techniques that the project will employ will have a construction cost impact of approximately 25% over installation of a standard irrigation system.

The following water conservation methods will be employed:
• Drought tolerant, native or adaptive species with low water requirements will be specified. • Plants will be grouped according to hydro-zones based upon water required to sustain them. • No high water use plants or turf are to be specified. • Decomposed granite or shredded bark mulch will be utilized in the planting areas to a minimum 2-1/2” depth. This reduces water demand.
• The landscape area shall be separately metered.
• Automatic irrigation controllers shall utilize evapotranspiration data for scheduling of all irrigation systems.
• Rain sensors that suspend or alter irrigation operations during rain shall be specified. • Irrigation to be designed to prevent run-off and low head drainage where water flows on to non-targeted areas such as adjacent property, non-irrigated areas, hardscapes, roadways or structures. • Master control valve and flow sensors will be specified. This will shut the irrigation system off in the event of a main line break.
2 | P a g e
• Each irrigation valve will be zoned to irrigate a hydro-zone with similar site, sun exposure, soil conditions and plant materials with similar water use.
• Trees will be placed on separate valves from shrubs and groundcovers. • Recommendations for annual irrigation schedule shall be specified. • In line drip tubing will be the primary method of applying water to the landscape areas.

Sincerely,
Jim Ridge, ASLA, LEED AP
Principal
~====================================================== ~ ~xccuti\lc :Bcpertmcnt ~tote of ~lifornia
EXECUTIVE ORDER B-29-15
WHEREAS on January 17, 2014, I proclaimed a State of Emergency to exist throughout the State of California due to severe drought conditions; and WHEREAS on April 25, 2014, I proclaimed a Continued State of Emergency to exist throughout the State of California due to the ongoing drought; and WHEREAS California's water supplies continue to be severely depleted despite a limited amount of rain and snowfall this winter, with record low snowpack in the Sierra Nevada mountains, decreased water levels in most of California's reservoirs, reduced flows in the state's rivers and shrinking supplies in underground water basins; and
WHEREAS the severe drought conditions continue to present urgent challenges including: drinking water shortages in communities across the state, diminished water for agricultural production, degraded habitat for many fish and wildlife species, increased wildfire risk, and the threat of saltwater contamination to fresh water supplies in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta; and WHEREAS a distinct possibility exists that the current drought will stretch into a fifth straight year in 2016 and beyond; and
WHEREAS new expedited actions are needed to reduce the harmful impacts from water shortages and other impacts of the drought; and WHEREAS the magnitude of the severe drought conditions continues to present threats beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single local government and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to combat; and
WHEREAS under the provisions of section 8558(b) of the Government Code, I find that conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property continue to exist in California due to water shortage and drought conditions with which local authority is unable to cope; and
WHEREAS under the provisions of section 8571 of the California Government Code, I find that strict compliance with various statutes and regulations specified in this order would prevent, hinder, or delay the mitigation of the effects of the drought.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor of the State of California, in accordance with the authority vested in me by the Constitution and statutes of the State of California, in particular Government Code sections 8567 and 8571 of the California Government Code, do hereby issue this Executive Order, effective immediately.
====================================================== ~ ATTACHMENT 1
~=======================================================~ IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The orders and provisions contained in my January 17, 2014 Proclamation, my April 25, 2014 Proclamation, and Executive Orders B-26-14 and B-28-14 remain in full force and effect except as modified herein.

SAVE WATER

2. The State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board) shall impose restrictions to achieve a statewide 25% reduction in potable urban water usage through February 28, 2016. These restrictions will require water suppliers to California's cities and towns to reduce usage as compared to the amount used in 2013. These restrictions should consider the relative per capita water usage of each water suppliers' service area, and require that those areas with high per capita use achieve proportionally greater reductions than those with low use. The California Public Utilities Commission is requested to take similar action with respect to investor-owned utilities providing water services.

3. The Department of Water Resources (the Department) shall lead a statewide initiative, in partnership with local agencies, to collectively replace 50 million square feet of lawns and ornamental turf with drought tolerant landscapes.

The Department shall provide funding to allow for lawn replacement programs in underserved communities, which will complement local programs already underway across the state.

4. The California Energy Commission, jointly with the Department and the Water Board, shall implement a time-limited statewide appliance rebate program to provide monetary incentives for the replacement of inefficient household devices.

5. The Water Board shall impose restrictions to require that commercial, industrial, and institutional properties, such as campuses, golf courses, and cemeteries, immediately implement water efficiency measures to reduce potable water usage in an amount consistent with the reduction targets · ·· · mandated by Directive 2 of this Executive Order.

6. The Water Board shall prohibit irrigation with potable water of ornamental turf on public street medians.

7. The Water Board shall prohibit irrigation with potable water outside of newly constructed homes and buildings that is not delivered by drip or microspray systems.
~======================================================~ ~======================================================~

8. The Water Board shall direct urban water suppliers to develop rate structures and other pricing mechanisms, including but not limited to surcharges, fees, and penalties, to maximize water conservation consistent with statewide water restrictions. The Water Board is directed to adopt emergency regulations, as it deems necessary, pursuant to Water Code section 1058.5 to implement this directive. The Water Board is further directed to work with state agencies and water suppliers to identify mechanisms that would encourage and facilitate the adoption of rate structures and other pricing mechanisms that promote water conservation. The California Public Utilities Commission is requested to take similar action with respect to investor-owned utilities providing water services.

INCREASE ENFORCEMENT AGAINST WATER WASTE

9. The Water Board shall require urban water suppliers to provide monthly information on water usage, conservation, and enforcement on a permanent basis.

10. The Water Board shall require frequent reporting of water diversion and use by water right holders, conduct inspections to determine whether illegal diversions or wasteful and unreasonable use of water are occurring, and bring enforcement actions against illegal diverters and those engaging in the wasteful and unreasonable use of water. Pursuant to Government Code sections 8570 and 8627, the Water Board is granted authority to inspect property or diversion facilities to ascertain compliance-with water rights laws and regulations where there is cause to believe such laws and regulations have been violated. When access is not granted by a property owner, the Water Board may obtain an inspection warrant pursuant to the procedures set 1 forth in Title 13 (commencing with section 1822.50) of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure for the purposes of conducting an inspection pursuant to this directive.

11. The Department shall update the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance through expedited regulation. This updated Ordinance shall increase water efficiency standards for new and existing landscapes through more efficient irrigation systems, greywater usage, onsite storm water capture, and by limiting the portion of landscapes that can be covered in turf.

It will also require reporting on the implementation and enforcement of local ordinances, with required reports due by December 31, 2015. The Department shall provide information on local compliance to the Water Board, which shall consider adopting regulations or taking appropriate enforcement actions to promote compliance. The Department shall provide technical assistance and give priority in grant funding to public agencies for actions necessary to comply with local ordinances.

12. Agricultural water suppliers that supply water to more than 25,000 acres shall include in their required 2015 Agricultural Water Management Plans a detailed drought management plan that describes. the actions and measures the supplier will take to manage water demand during drought. The Department shall require those plans to include quantification of water supplies and demands for 2013, 2014, and 2015 to the extent data is available. The Department will provide technical assistance to water suppliers in preparing the plans. ~~f.l U:.,lltlf•
~======================================================~ ~======================================================~

13. Agricultural water suppliers that supply water to 10,000 to 25,000 acres of irrigated lands shall develop Agricultural Water Management Plans and submit the plans to the Department by July 1, 2016. These plans shall include a detailed drought management plan and quantification of water supplies and demands in 2013, 2014, and 2015, to the extent that data is available. The Department shall give priority in grant funding to agricultural water suppliers that supply water to 10,000 to 25,000 acres of land for development and implementation of Agricultural Water Management Plans.

14. The Department shall report to Water Board on the status of the Agricultural Water Management Plan submittals within one month of receipt of those reports.

15. Local water agencies in high and medium priority groundwater basins shall immediately implement all requirements of the California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring Program pursuant to Water Code section 10933. The Department shall refer noncompliant local water agencies within high and medium priority groundwater basins to the Water Board by December 31, 2015, which shall consider adopting regulations or taking appropriate enforcement to promote compliance.

16. The California Energy Commission shall adopt emergency regulations establishing standards that improve the efficiency of water appliances, including toilets, urinals, and faucets available for sale and installation in new and existing buildings.

INVEST IN NEW TECHNOLOGIES

17. The California Energy Commission, jointly with the Department and the Water Board, shall implement a Water Energy Technology (WET) program to deploy innovative water management technologies for businesses, residents, industries, and agriculture. This program will achieve water and energy savings and greenhouse gas reductions by accelerating use of cutting-edge technologies such as renewable energy-powered desalination, integrated onsite reuse systems, water-use monitoring software, irrigation system timing and precision technology, and on-farm precision technology.

STREAMLINE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

18. The Office of Emergency Services and the Department of Housing and Community Development shall work jointly with counties to provide temporary assistance for persons moving from housing units due to a lack of potable water who are served by a private well or water utility with less than 15 connections, and where all reasonable attempts to find a potable water source have been exhausted.

19. State permitting agencies shall prioritize review and approval of water infrastructure projects and programs that increase local water supplies, including water recycling facilities, reservoir improvement projects, surface water treatment plants, desalination plants, stormwater capture, and greywater systems. Agencies shall report to the Governor's Office on applications that have been pending for longer than 90 days. ~=======================================================~ ~======================================================~

20. The Department shall take actions required to plan and, if necessary, implement Emergency Drought Salinity Barriers in coordination and consultation with the Water Board and the Department of Fish and Wildlife at locations within the Sacramento- San Joaquin delta estuary. These barriers will be designed to conserve water for use later in the year to meet state and federal Endangered Species Act requirements, preserve to the extent possible water quality in the Delta, and retain water supply for essential human health and safety uses in 2015 and in the future.

21. The Water Board and the Department of Fish and Wildlife shall immediately consider any necessary regulatory approvals for the purpose of installation of the Emergency Drought Salinity Barriers.

22. The Department shall immediately consider voluntary crop idling water transfer and water exchange proposals of one year or less in duration that are initiated by local public agencies and approved in 2015 by the Department subject to the criteria set forth in Water Code section 181 0.

23. The Water Board will prioritize new and amended safe drinking water permits that enhance water supply and reliability for community water systems facing water shortages or that expand service connections to include existing residences facing water shortages. As the Department of Public Health's drinking water program was transferred to the Water Board, any reference to the Department of Public Health in any prior Proclamation or Executive Order listed in Paragraph 1 is deemed to refer to the Water Board.

24. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection shall launch a public information campaign to educate the public on actions they can take to help to prevent wildfires including the proper treatment of dead and dying trees. Pursuant to Government Code section 8645, $1 .2 million from the State Responsibility Area Fire Prevention Fund (Fund 3063) shall be allocated to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to carry out this directive.

25. The Energy Commission shall expedite the processing of all applications or petitions for amendments to power plant certifications issued by the Energy Commission for the purpose of securing alternate water supply necessary for continued power plant operation. Title 20, section 1769 of the California Code of Regulations is hereby waived for any such petition, and the Energy Commission is authorized to create and implement an alternative process to consider such petitions. This process may delegate amendment approval authority, as appropriate, to the Energy Commission Executive Director. The Energy Commission shall give timely notice to all relevant local, regional, and state agencies of any petition subject to this directive, and shall post on its website any such petition.
~=======================================================~ ====================================================== ~

26. For purposes of carrying out directives 2-9, 11, 16-17, 20-23, and 25, Division 13 (commencing with section 21 000) of the Public Resources Code and regulations adopted pursuant to that Division are hereby suspended. This suspension applies to any actions taken by state agencies, and for actions taken by local agencies where the state agency with primary responsibility for implementing the directive concurs that local action is required, as well as for any necessary permits or approvals required to complete these actions. This suspension, and those specified in paragraph 9 of the January 17, 2014 Proclamation, paragraph 19 of the April 25, 2014 proclamation, and paragraph 4 of Executive Order B-26-14, shall remain in effect until May 31, 2016. Drought relief actions taken pursuant to these paragraphs that are started prior to May 31, 2016, but not completed, shall not be subject to Division 13 (commencing with section 21 000) of the Public Resources Code for the time required to complete them.

27. For purposes of carrying out directives 20 and 21, section 13247 and Chapter 3 of Part 3 (commencing with section 85225) of the Water Code are suspended.

28. For actions called for in this proclamation in directive 20, the Department shall exercise any authority vested in the Central Valley Flood Protection Board, as codified in Water Code section 8521, et seq., that is necessary to enable these urgent actions to be taken more quickly than otherwise possible.

The Director of the Department of Water Resources is specifically authorized, on behalf of the State of California, to request that the Secretary of the Army, on the recommendation of the Chief of Engineers of the Army Corps of Engineers, grant any permission required pursuant to section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and codified in section 48 of title 33 of the United States Code.

29. The Department is directed to enter into agreements with landowners for the purposes of planning and installation of the Emergency Drought Barriers in 2015 to the extent necessary to accommodate access to barrier locations, land-side and water-side construction, and materials staging in proximity to barrier locations. Where the Department is unable to reach an agreement with landowners, the Department may exercise the full authority of Government Code section 8572. ·

30. For purposes of this Executive Order, chapter 3.5 (commencing with section 11340) of part 1 of division 3 of the Government Code and chapter 5 (commencing with section 25400) of division 15 of the Public Resources Code are suspended for the development and adoption of regulations or guidelines needed to carry out the provisions in this Order. Any entity issuing regulations or guidelines pursuant to this directive shall conduct a public . meeting on the regulations and guidelines prior to adopting them. ~=======================================================~ ~=======================================================~

31. In order to ensure that equipment and services necessary for drought response can be procured quickly, the provisions of the Government Code and the Public Contract Code applicable to state contracts, including, but not limited to, advertising and competitive bidding requirements, are hereby suspended for directives 17, 20, and 24. Approval by the Department of Finance is required prior to the execution of any contract entered into pursuant to these directives.

This Executive Order is not intended to, and does not, create any rights or benefits, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, against the State of California, its agencies, departments, entities, officers, employees, or any other person.

I FURTHER DIRECT that as soon as hereafter possible, this Order be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State and that widespread publicity and notice be given to this Order.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have
hereunto set my hand and caused the
Great Seal of the State of California to
be affixed this 151 day of April2015. ·
EDMUND G. BROWN JR.

Governor of California
ATTEST:

ALEX PADILLA
Secretary of State
~======================================================~ Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
September 10, 2009
July 9, 2015 (Draft to California Water Commission)
1 ATTACHMENT 2
California Code of Regulations
Title 23. Waters
Division 2. Department of Water Resources
Chapter 2.7. Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
§ 490. Purpose.
(a) The State Legislature has found:
(1) that the waters of the state are of limited supply and are subject to ever increasing demands; (2) that the continuation of California’s economic prosperity is dependent on the availability of adequate supplies of water for future uses;
(3) that it is the policy of the State to promote the conservation and efficient use of water and to prevent the waste of this valuable resource;
(4) that landscapes are essential to the quality of life in California by providing areas for active and passive recreation and as an enhancement to the environment by cleaning air and water, preventing erosion, offering fire protection, and replacing ecosystems lost to development; and (5) that landscape design, installation, maintenance and management can and should be water efficient; and
(6) that Section 2 of Article X of the California Constitution specifies that the right to use water is limited to the amount reasonably required for the beneficial use to be served and the right does not and shall not extend to waste or unreasonable method of use. (b) Consistent with these legislative findings, the purpose of this model ordinance is to:
(1) promote the values and benefits of landscaping practices that integrate and go beyond the conservation and efficient use of water; landscapes while recognizing the need to invest water and other resources as efficiently as possible;
(2) establish a structure for planning, designing, installing, maintaining and managing water efficient landscapes in new construction and rehabilitated projects by encouraging the use of a watershed approach that requires cross-sector collaboration of industry, government and property owners to achieve the many benefits possible;
(3) establish provisions for water management practices and water waste prevention for existing landscapes;
(4) use water efficiently without waste by setting a Maximum Applied Water Allowance as an upper limit for water use and reduce water use to the lowest practical amount; (5) promote the benefits of consistent landscape ordinances with neighboring local and regional agencies;
(6) encourage local agencies and water purveyors to use economic incentives that promote the efficient use of water, such as implementing a tiered-rate structure; and (7) encourage local agencies to designate the necessary authority that implements and enforces the provisions of the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance or its local landscape ordinance.
(c) Landscapes that are planned, designed, installed, managed and maintained with the watershed based approach can improve California’s environmental conditions and provide benefits and realize sustainability goals. Such landscapes will make the urban environment resilient in the face of climatic extremes. Consistent with the legislative findings and purpose of the Ordinance, conditions in the urban setting will be improved by:
(1) Creating the conditions to support life in the soil by reducing compaction, incorporating organic matter that increases water retention, and promoting productive plant growth that leads to more carbon storage, oxygen production, shade, habitat and esthetic benefits. 2 (2) Minimizing energy use by reducing irrigation water requirements, reducing reliance on petroleum based fertilizers and pesticides, and planting climate appropriate shade trees in urban areas.
(3) Conserving water by capturing and reusing rainwater and graywater wherever possible and selecting climate appropriate plants that need minimal supplemental water after establishment. (4) Protecting air and water quality by reducing power equipment use and landfill disposal trips, selecting recycled and locally sourced materials, and using compost, mulch and efficient irrigation equipment to prevent erosion.
(5) Protecting existing habitat and creating new habitat by choosing local native plants, climate adapted non-natives and avoiding invasive plants. Utilizing integrated pest management with least toxic methods as the first course of action.
.

Note: Authority cited: Section 65593, Government Code. Reference: Sections 65591, 65593, 65596, Government Code.
§ 490.1 Applicability
(a) After January 1, 2010 December 1, 2015, and consistent with Executive Order No. B-29-15, this ordinance shall apply to all of the following landscape projects:
(1) new development projects with an aggregate landscape area equal to or greater than 500 square feet requiring a building or landscape permit, plan check or design review; (2) rehabilitated landscape projects with an aggregate landscape area equal to or greater than 2,500 square feet requiring a building or landscape permit, plan check, or design review; (1) new construction and rehabilitated landscapes for public agency projects and private development projects with a landscape area equal to or greater than 2,500 square feet requiring a building or landscape permit, plan check or design review; (2) new construction and rehabilitated landscapes which are developer-installed in single-family and multi-family projects with a landscape area equal to or greater than 2,500 square feet requiring a building or landscape permit, plan check, or design review; (3) new construction landscapes which are homeowner-provided and/or homeowner-hired in single-family and multi-family residential projects with a total project landscape area equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet requiring a building or landscape permit, plan check or design review;
(3) (4) existing landscapes limited to Sections 493, 493.1 and 493.2; and (4) (5) cemeteries. Recognizing the special landscape management needs of cemeteries, new and rehabilitated cemeteries are limited to Sections 492.4, 492.11 and 492.12; and existing cemeteries are limited to Sections 493, 493.1 and 493.2. (b) For local land use agencies working together to develop a regional water efficient landscape ordinance, the reporting requirements of this ordinance shall become effective December 1, 2015 and the remainder of this ordinance shall be effective no later than February 1, 2016. (c) Any project with an aggregate landscape area of 2,500 square feet or less may comply with the performance requirements of this ordinance or conform to the prescriptive measures contained in Appendix D.
(d) For projects using treated or untreated graywater or rainwater captured on site, any lot or parcel within the project that has less than 2500 sq. ft of landscape and meets the lot or parcel’s landscape water requirement (Estimated Total Water Use) entirely with treated or untreated graywater or through stored rainwater captured on site is subject only to Appendix D section (5). (be) This ordinance does not apply to:
(1) registered local, state or federal historical sites; (2) ecological restoration projects that do not require a permanent irrigation system; 3 (3) mined-land reclamation projects that do not require a permanent irrigation system; or (4) existing plant collections, as part of botanical gardens and arboretums open to the public.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 491. Definitions.

The terms used in this ordinance have the meaning set forth below:
(a) “applied water” means the portion of water supplied by the irrigation system to the landscape. (b) “automatic irrigation controller” means an automatic timing device used to remotely control valves that operate an irrigation system. Automatic irrigation controllers are able to self-adjust and schedule irrigation events using either evapotranspiration (weather-based) or soil moisture data. (c) “backflow prevention device” means a safety device used to prevent pollution or contamination of the water supply due to the reverse flow of water from the irrigation system. (d) “Certificate of Completion” means the document required under Section 492.9. (e) “certified irrigation designer” means a person certified to design irrigation systems by an accredited academic institution, a professional trade organization or other program such as the US Environmental Protection Agency’s WaterSense irrigation designer certification program and Irrigation Association’s Certified Irrigation Designer program.
(f) “certified landscape irrigation auditor” means a person certified to perform landscape irrigation audits by an accredited academic institution, a professional trade organization or other program such as the US Environmental Protection Agency’s WaterSense irrigation auditor certification program and Irrigation Association’s Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor program. (g) “check valve” or “anti-drain valve” means a valve located under a sprinkler head, or other location in the irrigation system, to hold water in the system to prevent drainage from sprinkler heads when the sprinkler is off.
(h) “common interest developments” means community apartment projects, condominium projects, planned developments, and stock cooperatives per Civil Code Section 1351. (i) “compost” means the safe and stable product of controlled biologic decomposition of organic materials that is beneficial to plant growth.
(ij) “conversion factor (0.62)” means the number that converts acre-inches per acre per year to gallons per square foot per year.
(k) “distribution uniformity” means the measure of the uniformity of irrigation water over a defined area.
(jl) “drip irrigation” means any non-spray low volume irrigation system utilizing emission devices with a flow rate measured in gallons per hour. Low volume irrigation systems are specifically designed to apply small volumes of water slowly at or near the root zone of plants. (km) “ecological restoration project” means a project where the site is intentionally altered to establish a defined, indigenous, historic ecosystem.
(ln) “effective precipitation” or “usable rainfall” (Eppt) means the portion of total precipitation which becomes available for plant growth.
(mo) “emitter” means a drip irrigation emission device that delivers water slowly from the system to the soil.
(np) “established landscape” means the point at which plants in the landscape have developed significant root growth into the soil. Typically, most plants are established after one or two years of growth. (oq) “establishment period of the plants” means the first year after installing the plant in the landscape or the first two years if irrigation will be terminated after establishment. Typically, most plants are established after one or two years of growth. Native habitat mitigation areas and trees may need three to five years for establishment.
(pr) “Estimated Total Water Use” (ETWU) means the total water used for the landscape as described in Section 492.4.
4 (qs) “ET adjustment factor” (ETAF) means a factor of 0.70.55 for residential areas and 0.45 for nonresidential areas, that, when applied to reference evapotranspiration, adjusts for plant factors and irrigation efficiency, two major influences upon the amount of water that needs to be applied to the landscape. A combined plant mix with a site-wide average of 0.5 is the basis of the plant factor portion of this calculation. For purposes of the ETAF, the average irrigation efficiency is 0.71. Therefore, the ET Adjustment Factor is (0.7)=(0.5/0.71). The ETAF for a new and existing (non-rehabilitated) Special Landscape Areas shall not exceed 1.0. The ETAF for existing non-rehabilitated landscapes is 0.8. (rt) “evapotranspiration rate” means the quantity of water evaporated from adjacent soil and other surfaces and transpired by plants during a specified time. (su) “flow rate” means the rate at which water flows through pipes, valves and emission devices, measured in gallons per minute, gallons per hour, or cubic feet per second. (v) “flow sensor” means an inline device installed at the supply point of the irrigation system that produces a repeatable signal proportional to flow rate. Flow sensors must be connected to an automatic irrigation controller, or flow monitor capable of receiving flow signals and operating master valves. This combination flow sensor/controller may also function as a landscape water meter or submeter. (w) “friable” means a soil condition that is easily crumbled or loosely compacted down to a minimum depth per planting material requirements, whereby the root structure of newly planted material will be allowed to spread unimpeded.
(x) “Fuel Modification Plan Guideline” means guidelines from a local fire authority to assist residents and businesses that are developing land or building structures in a fire hazard severity zone. (y) "graywater" means untreated wastewater that has not been contaminated by any toilet discharge, has not been affected by infectious, contaminated, or unhealthy bodily wastes, and does not present a threat from contamination by unhealthful processing, manufacturing, or operating wastes. "Graywater" includes, but is not limited to, wastewater from bathtubs, showers, bathroom washbasins, clothes washing machines, and laundry tubs, but does not include wastewater from kitchen sinks or dishwashers. Health and Safety Code Section 17922.12.
(tz) “hardscapes” means any durable material (pervious and non-pervious). (u) “homeowner-provided landscaping” means any landscaping either installed by a private individual for a single family residence or installed by a licensed contractor hired by a homeowner. A homeowner, for purposes of this ordinance, is a person who occupies the dwelling he or she owns. This excludes speculative homes, which are not owner-occupied dwellings. (aa) (v) “hydrozone” means a portion of the landscaped area having plants with similar water needs and rooting depth. A hydrozone may be irrigated or non-irrigated. (bb) (w) “infiltration rate” means the rate of water entry into the soil expressed as a depth of water per unit of time (e.g., inches per hour).
(cc) (x) “invasive plant species” means species of plants not historically found in California that spread outside cultivated areas and can damage environmental or economic resources. Invasive species may be regulated by county agricultural agencies as noxious species. “Noxious weeds” means any weed designated by the Weed Control Regulations in the Weed Control Act and identified on a Regional District noxious weed control list. Lists of invasive plants are maintained at the California Invasive Plant Inventory and USDA invasive and noxious weeds database. (dd) (y) “irrigation audit” means an in-depth evaluation of the performance of an irrigation system conducted by a Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor. An irrigation audit includes, but is not limited to:
inspection, system tune-up, system test with distribution uniformity or emission uniformity, reporting overspray or runoff that causes overland flow, and preparation of an irrigation schedule. The audit must be conducted in a manner consistent with the Irrigation Association’s Landscape Irrigation Auditor Certification program or other U.S. Environmental Protection Agency “Watersense” labeled auditing program.
(ee) (z) “irrigation efficiency” (IE) means the measurement of the amount of water beneficially used divided by the amount of water applied. Irrigation efficiency is derived from measurements and estimates 5 of irrigation system characteristics and management practices. The minimum average irrigation efficiencyies for purposes of this ordinance are 0.75 for overhead spray devices and 0.81 for drip systems. is 0.71. Greater irrigation efficiency can be expected from well designed and maintained systems. (ff) (aa) “irrigation survey” means an evaluation of an irrigation system that is less detailed than an irrigation audit. An irrigation survey includes, but is not limited to: inspection, system test, and written recommendations to improve performance of the irrigation system. (gg) (bb) “irrigation water use analysis” means a review of water use data based on meter readings and billing data.
(hh) (cc) “landscape architect” means a person who holds a license to practice landscape architecture in the state of California Business and Professions Code, Section 5615. (ii) (dd) “landscape area” means all the planting areas, turf areas, and water features in a landscape design plan subject to the Maximum Applied Water Allowance calculation. The landscape area does not include footprints of buildings or structures, sidewalks, driveways, parking lots, decks, patios, gravel or stone walks, other pervious or non-pervious hardscapes, and other non-irrigated areas designated for non-development (e.g., open spaces and existing native vegetation). (jj) (ee) “landscape contractor” means a person licensed by the state of California to construct, maintain, repair, install, or subcontract the development of landscape systems. (kk) (ff) “Landscape Documentation Package” means the documents required under Section 492.3. (ll) (gg) “landscape project” means total area of landscape in a project as defined in “landscape area” for the purposes of this ordinance, meeting requirements under Section 490.1. (mm) “landscape water meter” means an inline device installed at the irrigation supply point that measures the flow of water into the irrigation system and is connected to a totalizer to record water use. (nn) (hh) “lateral line” means the water delivery pipeline that supplies water to the emitters or sprinklers from the valve.
(oo) (ii) “local agency” means a city or county, including a charter city or charter county, that is responsible for adopting and implementing the ordinance. The local agency is also responsible for the enforcement of this ordinance, including but not limited to, approval of a permit and plan check or design review of a project.
(pp) (jj) “local water purveyor” means any entity, including a public agency, city, county, or private water company that provides retail water service.
(qq) (kk) “low volume irrigation” means the application of irrigation water at low pressure through a system of tubing or lateral lines and low-volume emitters such as drip, drip lines, and bubblers. Low volume irrigation systems are specifically designed to apply small volumes of water slowly at or near the root zone of plants.
(rr) (ll) “main line” means the pressurized pipeline that delivers water from the water source to the valve or outlet.
(ss) “master shut-off valve” is an automatic valve installed at the irrigation supply point which controls water flow into the irrigation system. When this valve is closed water will not be supplied to the irrigation system. A master valve will greatly reduce any water loss due to a leaky station valve. (tt) (mm) “Maximum Applied Water Allowance” (MAWA) means the upper limit of annual applied water for the established landscaped area as specified in Section 492.4. It is based upon the area’s reference evapotranspiration, the ET Adjustment Factor, and the size of the landscape area. The Estimated Total Water Use shall not exceed the Maximum Applied Water Allowance. Special Landscape Areas, including recreation areas, areas permanently and solely dedicated to edible plants such as orchards and vegetable gardens, and areas irrigated with recycled water are subject to the MAWA with an ETAF not to exceed 1.0. MAWA = (ETo) (0.62) [(ETAF x LA) + ((1-ETAF) x SLA)], (uu) “median” is an area between opposing lanes of traffic that may be unplanted or planted with trees, shrubs, perennials, and ornamental grasses.
6 (vv) (nn) “microclimate” means the climate of a small, specific area that may contrast with the climate of the overall landscape area due to factors such as wind, sun exposure, plant density, or proximity to reflective surfaces.
(ww) (oo) “mined-land reclamation projects” means any surface mining operation with a reclamation plan approved in accordance with the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975. (xx) (pp) “mulch” means any organic material such as leaves, bark, straw, compost, or inorganic mineral materials such as rocks, gravel, and or decomposed granite left loose and applied to the soil surface for the beneficial purposes of reducing evaporation, suppressing weeds, moderating soil temperature, and preventing soil erosion.
(yy) (qq) “new construction” means, for the purposes of this ordinance, a new building with a landscape or other new landscape, such as a park, playground, or greenbelt without an associated building. (zzxx)”non-residential landscape” means landscapes in commercial, institutional, industrial and public settings that may have areas designated for recreation or public assembly. It also includes portions of common areas of common interest developments with designated recreational areas. (aaa) (rr) “operating pressure” means the pressure at which the parts of an irrigation system are designed by the manufacturer to operate.
(bbb) (ss) “overhead sprinkler irrigation systems” means systems that deliver water through the air (e.g., spray heads and rotors).
(ccc) (tt) “overspray” means the irrigation water which is delivered beyond the target area. (ddd) (uu) “permit” means an authorizing document issued by local agencies for new construction or rehabilitated landscapes.
(eee) (vv) “pervious” means any surface or material that allows the passage of water through the material and into the underlying soil.
(fff) (ww) “plant factor” or “plant water use factor” is a factor, when multiplied by ETo, estimates the amount of water needed by plants. For purposes of this ordinance, the plant factor range for very low water use plants is 0 to 0.1, the plant factor range for low water use plants is 00.1 to 0.3, the plant factor range for moderate water use plants is 0.4 to 0.6, and the plant factor range for high water use plants is

0.7 to 1.0. Plant factors cited in this ordinance are derived from the Department of Water Resources 2000 publication “Water Use Classification of Landscape Species”. Plant factors may also be obtained from horticultural researchers from academic institutions or professional associations as approved by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR).
(xx) “precipitation rate” means the rate of application of water measured in inches per hour. (ggg) (yy) “project applicant” means the individual or entity submitting a Landscape Documentation Package required under Section 492.3 to request a permit, plan check, or design review from the local agency. A project applicant may be the property owner or his or her designee. (hhh) (zz) “rain sensor” or “rain sensing shutoff device” means a component which automatically suspends an irrigation event when it rains.
(iii) (aaa) “record drawing” or “as-builts” means a set of reproducible drawings which show significant changes in the work made during construction and which are usually based on drawings marked up in the field and other data furnished by the contractor.
(jjj) (bbb) “recreational area” means areas, excluding private single family residential areas, dedicated designated to for active play, recreation or public assembly such as in parks, sports fields, picnic grounds, amphitheaters and or golf courses tees, fairways, roughs, surrounds and greens. (kkk) (ccc) “recycled water”, “reclaimed water”, or “treated sewage effluent water” means treated or recycled waste water of a quality suitable for non-potable uses such as landscape irrigation and water features. This water is not intended for human consumption. (lll) (ddd) “reference evapotranspiration” or “ETo” means a standard measurement of environmental parameters which affect the water use of plants. ETo is expressed in inches per day, month, or year as represented in Appendix A Section 495.1, and is an estimate of the evapotranspiration of a large field of four- to seven-inch tall, cool-season grass that is well watered. Reference evapotranspiration is used as 7 the basis of determining the Maximum Applied Water Allowance so that regional differences in climate can be accommodated.
(mmm) Regional Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance” means a local Ordinance adopted by two or more local agencies, water suppliers and other stakeholders for implementing a consistent set of landscape provisions throughout a geographical region. Regional ordinances are strongly encouraged to provide a consistent framework for the landscape industry and applicants to adhere to. (nnn) (eee) “rehabilitated landscape” means any re-landscaping project that requires a permit, plan check, or design review, meets the requirements of Section 490.1, and the modified landscape area is equal to or greater than 2,500 square feet. is 50% of the total landscape area, and the modifications are completed within one year.
(ooo) “residential landscape” means landscapes surrounding single or multifamily homes. (ppp) (fff) “runoff” means water which is not absorbed by the soil or landscape to which it is applied and flows from the landscape area. For example, runoff may result from water that is applied at too great a rate (application rate exceeds infiltration rate) or when there is a slope. (qqq) (ggg) “soil moisture sensing device” or “soil moisture sensor” means a device that measures the amount of water in the soil. The device may also suspend or initiate an irrigation event. (rrr) (hhh) “soil texture” means the classification of soil based on its percentage of sand, silt, and clay. (sss) (iii) “Special Landscape Area” (SLA) means an area of the landscape dedicated solely to edible plants, recreational areas, areas irrigated with recycled water, or water features using recycled water and areas dedicated to active play such as parks, sports fields, golf courses, and where turf provides a playing surface.
(ttt) (jjj) “sprinkler head” means a device which delivers water through a nozzle. (uuu) (kkk) “static water pressure” means the pipeline or municipal water supply pressure when water is not flowing.
(vvv) (lll) “station” means an area served by one valve or by a set of valves that operate simultaneously. (www) (mmm) “swing joint” means an irrigation component that provides a flexible, leak-free connection between the emission device and lateral pipeline to allow movement in any direction and to prevent equipment damage.
(xxx) “submeter” means a metering device to measure water applied to the landscape that is installed after the primary utility water meter.
(yyy) (nnn) “turf” means a ground cover surface of mowed grass. Annual bluegrass, Kentucky bluegrass, Perennial ryegrass, Red fescue, and Tall fescue are cool-season grasses. Bermudagrass, Kikuyugrass, Seashore Paspalum, St. Augustinegrass, Zoysiagrass, and Buffalo grass are warm-season grasses.
(zzz) (ooo) “valve” means a device used to control the flow of water in the irrigation system. (aaaa) (ppp) “water conserving plant species” means a plant species identified as having a very low or low plant factor.
(bbbb) (qqq)“water feature” means a design element where open water performs an aesthetic or recreational function. Water features include ponds, lakes, waterfalls, fountains, artificial streams, spas, and swimming pools (where water is artificially supplied). The surface area of water features is included in the high water use hydrozone of the landscape area. Constructed wetlands used for on-site wastewater treatment or stormwater best management practices that are not irrigated and used solely for water treatment or stormwater retention are not water features and, therefore, are not subject to the water budget calculation.
(cccc) (rrr) “watering window” means the time of day irrigation is allowed. (dddd) (sss) “WUCOLS” means the Water Use Classification of Landscape Species published by the University of California Cooperative Extension, and the Department of Water Resources and the Bureau of Reclamation, 2000 2014.
8 Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Sections 65592, 65596, Government Code.
§ 492. Provisions for New Construction or Rehabilitated Landscapes. (a) A local agency may designate by mutual agreement, another agency, such as a water purveyor, to implement some or all of the requirements contained in this ordinance. Local agencies may collaborate with water purveyors to define each entity’s specific responsibilities relating to this ordinance.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.1 Compliance with Landscape Documentation Package. (a) Prior to construction, the local agency shall:
(1) provide the project applicant with the ordinance and procedures for permits, plan checks, or design reviews;
(2) review the Landscape Documentation Package submitted by the project applicant; (3) approve or deny the Landscape Documentation Package; (4) issue a permit or approve the plan check or design review for the project applicant; and (5) upon approval of the Landscape Documentation Package, submit a copy of the Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet to the local water purveyor. (b) Prior to construction, the project applicant shall:
(1) submit a Landscape Documentation Package to the local agency. (c) Upon approval of the Landscape Documentation Package by the local agency, the project applicant shall:
(1) receive a permit or approval of the plan check or design review and record the date of the permit in the Certificate of Completion;
(2) submit a copy of the approved Landscape Documentation Package along with the record drawings, and any other information to the property owner or his/her designee; and (3) submit a copy of the Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet to the local water purveyor.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.2 Penalties.
(a) A local agency may establish and administer penalties to the project applicant for non-compliance with the ordinance to the extent permitted by law.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.3 Elements of the Landscape Documentation Package. (a) The Landscape Documentation Package shall include the following six (6) elements:
(1) project information;
(A) date
(B) project applicant
(C) project address (if available, parcel and/or lot number(s)) (D) total landscape area (square feet)
(E) project type (e.g., new, rehabilitated, public, private, cemetery, homeowner-installed) (F) water supply type (e.g., potable, recycled, well) and identify the local retail water purveyor if the applicant is not served by a private well (G) checklist of all documents in Landscape Documentation Package (H) project contacts to include contact information for the project applicant and property owner
9 (I) applicant signature and date with statement, “I agree to comply with the requirements of the water efficient landscape ordinance and submit a complete Landscape Documentation Package”.
(2) Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet;
(A) water budget calculations

1. Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA)

2. Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU)
(3) soil management report;
(4) landscape design plan;
(5) irrigation design plan; and
(6) grading design plan.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.4 Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet.
(a) A project applicant shall complete the Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet in Appendix B which contains information on the plant factor, irrigation method, irrigation efficiency, and area associated with each hydrozone. Calculations are then made to show that the evapotranspiration adjustment factor (ETAF) for the landscape project does not exceed a factor of 0.55 for residential areas and 0.45 for nonresidential areas, exclusive of Special Landscape Areas. The ETAF for a landscape project is based on the plant factors and irrigation methods selected. The Maximum Applied Water Allowance is calculated based on the maximum ETAF allowed (0.55 for residential areas and 0.45 for non-residential areas) and expressed as annual gallons required. The Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU) is calculated based on the plants used and irrigation method selected for the landscape design. ETWU must be below the MAWA. two sections (see sample worksheet in Appendix B):
(1) a hydrozone information table (see Appendix B, Section A) for the landscape project; and (2) a water budget calculation (see Appendix B, Section B) for the landscape project. For the calculation of the
(1) In calculating the Maximum Applied Water Allowance and Estimated Total Water Use, a project applicant shall use the ETo values from the Reference Evapotranspiration Table in Appendix A. For geographic areas not covered in Appendix A, use data from other cities located nearby in the same reference evapotranspiration zone, as found in the CIMIS Reference Evapotranspiration Zones Map, Department of Water Resources, 1999. (b) Water budget calculations shall adhere to the following requirements:
(1) The plant factor used shall be from WUCOLS or from horticultural researchers with academic institutions or professional associations as approved by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). The plant factor ranges from 0 to 0.1 for very low water using plants, 0.1 to

0.3 for low water use plants, from 0.4 to 0.6 for moderate water use plants, and from 0.7 to 1.0 for high water use plants.
(2) All water features shall be included in the high water use hydrozone and temporarily irrigated areas shall be included in the low water use hydrozone. (3) All Special Landscape Areas shall be identified and their water use calculated as shown in Appendix B described below.
(4) ETAF for new and existing (non-rehabilitated) Special Landscape Areas shall not exceed 1.0. (c) Maximum Applied Water Allowance
The Maximum Applied Water Allowance shall be calculated using the equation:

MAWA = (ETo) (0.62) [(0.70.5 x LA) + (0.3 x SLA)]
10 The example calculations below are hypothetical to demonstrate proper use of the equations and do not represent an existing and/or planned landscape project. The ETo values used in these calculations are from the Reference Evapotranspiration Table in Appendix A, for planning purposes only. For actual irrigation scheduling, automatic irrigation controllers are required and shall use current reference evapotranspiration data, such as from the California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS), other equivalent data, or soil moisture sensor data. (1) Example MAWA calculation for a residential landscape project: a hypothetical landscape project in Fresno, CA with an irrigated landscape area of 50,000 square feet without any Special Landscape Area (SLA= 0, no edible plants, recreational areas, or use of recycled water). To calculate MAWA, the annual reference evapotranspiration value for Fresno is 51.1 inches as listed in the Reference Evapotranspiration Table in Appendix A.

MAWA = (ETo) (0.62) [(0.7 x LA) + (0.3 x SLA)]
MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance (gallons per year) ETo = Reference Evapotranspiration (inches per year)

0.62 = Conversion Factor (to gallons)

0.7 = ET Adjustment Factor (ETAF)
LA = Landscape Area including SLA (square feet)

0.3 = Additional Water Allowance for SLA
SLA = Special Landscape Area (square feet)
MAWA = (51.1 inches) (0.62) [(0.7 x 50,000 square feet) + (0.3 x 0)] = 1,108,870 gallons per year
To convert from gallons per year to hundred-cubic-feet per year:
= 1,108,870 /748 = 482 hundred-cubic-feet per year
(100 cubic feet = 748 gallons)
(2) In this next hypothetical example, the landscape project in Fresno, CA has the same ETo value of 51.1 inches and a total landscape area of 50,000 square feet. Within the 50,000 square foot project, there is now a 2,000 square foot area planted with edible plants. This 2,000 square foot area is considered to be a Special Landscape Area.

MAWA = (ETo) (0.62) [(0.7 x LA) + (0.3 x SLA)]
MAWA = (51.1 inches) (0.62) [(0.7 x 50,000 square feet) + (0.3 x 2,000 square feet)] = 31.68 x [35,000 + 600] gallons per year
= 31.68 x 35,600 gallons per year
=1,127,808 gallons per year or 508 hundred-cubic-feet per year (d) Estimated Total Water Use.

The Estimated Total Water Use shall be calculated using the equation below. The sum of the Estimated Total Water Use calculated for all hydrozones shall not exceed MAWA.

Where:

ETWU = Estimated Total Water Use per year (gallons)
ETo = Reference Evapotranspiration (inches)
PF = Plant Factor from WUCOLS (see Section 491)
HA = Hydrozone Area [high, medium, and low water use areas] (square feet) SLA = Special Landscape Area (square feet)

0.62 = Conversion Factor

= + SLA
IE
PF x HA
ETWU (ETo)(0.62)
11 IE = Irrigation Efficiency (minimum 0.71)
(1) Example ETWU calculation: landscape area is 50,000 square feet; plant water use type, plant factor, and hydrozone area are shown in the table below. The ETo value is 51.1 inches per year.

There are no Special Landscape Areas (recreational area, area permanently and solely dedicated to edible plants, and area irrigated with recycled water) in this example. *Plant Factor from WUCOLS

= +0

0.85 17,500 ETWU (51.1)(0.62)
= 1,102,116 gallons per year
Compare ETWU with MAWA: For this example MAWA = (51.1) (0.62) [(0.7 x 50,000) + (0.3 x 0)] = 1,108,870 gallons per year. The ETWU (1,102,116 gallons per year) is less than MAWA (1,108,870 gallons per year). In this example, the water budget complies with the MAWA. (2) Example ETWU calculation: total landscape area is 50,000 square feet, 2,000 square feet of which is planted with edible plants. The edible plant area is considered a Special Landscape Area (SLA). The reference evapotranspiration value is 51.1 inches per year. The plant type, plant factor, and hydrozone area are shown in the table below. *Plant Factor from WUCOLS

= + 2,000

0.85 16,300 ETWU (51.1)(0.62)
= (31.68) (33,099 + 2,000)
= 1,111,936 gallons per year
Compare ETWU with MAWA. For this example:

Hydrozone
Plant Water
Use Type(s)
Plant
Factor
(PF)*
Hydrozone
Area (HA)
(square feet)
PF x HA
(square feet)
1 High 0.8 7,000 5,600
2 High 0.7 10,000 7,000
3 Medium 0.5 16,000 8,000
4 Low 0.3 7,000 2,100
5 Low 0.2 10,000 2,000
Sum 24,700
Hydrozone
Plant Water
Use Type(s)
Plant
Factor
(PF)*
Hydrozone
Area (HA)
(square feet)
PF x HA
(square feet)
1 High 0.8 7,000 5,600
2 High 0.7 9,000 6,300
3 Medium 0.5 15,000 7,500
4 Low 0.3 7,000 2,100
5 Low 0.2 10,000 2,000
Sum 23,500
6 SLA 1.0 2,000 2,000
12 MAWA = (51.1) (0.62) [(0.7 x 50,000) + (0.3 x 2,000)] = 31.68 x [35,000 + 600]
= 31.68 x 35,600
= 1,127,808gallons per year
The ETWU (1,111,936 gallons per year) is less than MAWA (1,127,808 gallons per year). For this example, the water budget complies with the MAWA.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.5 Soil Management Report.
(a) In order to reduce runoff and encourage healthy plant growth, a soil management report shall be completed by the project applicant, or his/her designee, as follows:
(1) Submit soil samples to a laboratory for analysis and recommendations. (A) Soil sampling shall be conducted in accordance with laboratory protocol, including protocols regarding adequate sampling depth for the intended plants. (B) The soil analysis may shall include:

1. soil texture;

2. infiltration rate determined by laboratory test or soil texture infiltration rate table;

3. pH;

4. total soluble salts;

5. sodium;

6. percent organic matter; and

7. recommendations
(C) In projects with multiple landscape installations (i.e. production home developments) a soil sampling rate of 1 in 7 lots or approximately 15% will satisfy this requirement. Large landscape projects shall sample at a rate equivalent to 1 in 7 lots. (2) The project applicant, or his/her designee, shall comply with one of the following:
(A) If significant mass grading is not planned, the soil analysis report shall be submitted to the local agency as part of the Landscape Documentation Package; or (B) If significant mass grading is planned, the soil analysis report shall be submitted to the local agency as part of the Certificate of Completion. (3) The soil analysis report shall be made available, in a timely manner, to the professionals preparing the landscape design plans and irrigation design plans to make any necessary adjustments to the design plans.
(4) The project applicant, or his/her designee, shall submit documentation verifying implementation of soil analysis report recommendations to the local agency with Certificate of Completion.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.6 Landscape Design Plan.
(a) For the efficient use of water, a landscape shall be carefully designed and planned for the intended function of the project. A landscape design plan meeting the following design criteria shall be submitted as part of the Landscape Documentation Package.
(1) Plant Material
(A) Any plant may be selected for the landscape providing the Estimated Total Water Use in the landscape area does not exceed the Maximum Applied Water Allowance. To 13 encourage the efficient use of water, the following is highly recommended Methods to achieve water efficiency shall include one or more of the following:

1. protection and preservation of native species and natural vegetation;

2. selection of water-conserving plant, tree and turf species, especially local native plants;

3. selection of plants based on local climate suitability, disease and pest resistance;

4. selection of trees based on applicable local tree ordinances or tree shading guidelines, and size at maturity as appropriate for the planting area; and

5. selection of plants from local and regional landscape program plant lists.

6. selection of plants from local Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines. (B) Each hydrozone shall have plant materials with similar water use, with the exception of hydrozones with plants of mixed water use, as specified in Section 492.7(a)(2)(D). (C) Plants shall be selected and planted appropriately based upon their adaptability to the climatic, geologic, and topographical conditions of the project site. To encourage the efficient use of water, the following is highly recommended Methods to achieve water efficiency shall include one or more of the following:

1. use the Sunset Western Climate Zone System which takes into account temperature, humidity, elevation, terrain, latitude, and varying degrees of continental and marine influence on local climate;

2. recognize the horticultural attributes of plants (i.e., mature plant size, invasive surface roots) to minimize damage to property or infrastructure [e.g., buildings, sidewalks, power lines]; allow for adequate soil volume for healthy root growth and

3. consider the solar orientation for plant placement to maximize summer shade and winter solar gain.
(D) Turf is not allowed on slopes greater than 25% where the toe of the slope is adjacent to an impermeable hardscape and where 25% means 1 foot of vertical elevation change for every 4 feet of horizontal length (rise divided by run x 100 = slope percent). (E) High water use plants, characterized by a plant factor of 0.7 to 1.0, are prohibited in street medians.
(F) (E) A landscape design plan for projects in fire-prone areas shall address fire safety and prevention. A defensible space or zone around a building or structure is required per Public Resources Code Section 4291(a) and (b). Avoid fire-prone plant materials and highly flammable mulches. Refer to the local Fuel Modification Plan guidelines. (G) (F) The use of invasive and/or noxious plant species, such as those listed by the California Invasive Plant Council, is strongly discouraged. (H) (G) The architectural guidelines of a common interest development, which include community apartment projects, condominiums, planned developments, and stock cooperatives, shall not prohibit or include conditions that have the effect of prohibiting the use of low-water use plants as a group.
(2) Water Features
(A) Recirculating water systems shall be used for water features. (B) Where available, recycled water shall be used as a source for decorative water features.
(C) Surface area of a water feature shall be included in the high water use hydrozone area of the water budget calculation.
(D) Pool and spa covers are highly recommended.
(3) Soil Preparation, Mulch and Amendments
14 (A) Prior to the planting of any materials, compacted soils shall be transformed to a friable condition. On engineered slopes, only amended planting holes need meet this requirement.
(B) Soil amendments shall be incorporated according to recommendations of the soil report and what is appropriate for the plants selected (see Section 492.5). (C) For landscape installations, compost at a rate of a minimum of four cubic yards per 1,000 square feet of permeable area shall be incorporated to a depth of six inches into the soil. Soils with greater than 6% organic matter in the top 6 inches of soil are exempt from adding compost and tilling.
(D) (A) A minimum two three inch (23Ǝ) layer of mulch shall be applied on all exposed soil surfaces of planting areas except in turf areas, creeping or rooting groundcovers, or direct seeding applications where mulch is contraindicated. To provide habitat for beneficial insects and other wildlife, up to 5 % of the landscape area may be left without mulch. Designated insect habitat must be included in the landscape design plan as such. (E) (B) Stabilizing mulching products shall be used on slopes that meet current engineering standards.
(F) (C) The mulching portion of the seed/mulch slurry in hydro-seeded applications shall meet the mulching requirement.
(G) Organic mulch materials made from recycled or post-consumer shall take precedence over inorganic materials or virgin forest products unless the recycled post-consumer organic products are not locally available. Organic mulches are not required where prohibited by local Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines or other applicable local ordinances.
(D) Soil amendments shall be incorporated according to recommendations of the soil report and what is appropriate for the plants selected (see Section 492.5). (b) The landscape design plan, at a minimum, shall:
(1) delineate and label each hydrozone by number, letter, or other method; (2) identify each hydrozone as low, moderate, high water, or mixed water use. Temporarily irrigated areas of the landscape shall be included in the low water use hydrozone for the water budget calculation;
(3) identify recreational areas;
(4) identify areas permanently and solely dedicated to edible plants; (5) identify areas irrigated with recycled water;
(6) identify type of mulch and application depth;
(7) identify soil amendments, type, and quantity;
(8) identify type and surface area of water features;
(9) identify hardscapes (pervious and non-pervious);
(10) identify location, installation details, and 24-hour retention or infiltration capacity of any applicable stormwater best management practices that encourage on-site retention and infiltration of stormwater. Project applicants shall refer to the local agency or regional Water Quality Control Board for information on any applicable stormwater technical requirements. Stormwater best management practices are encouraged in the landscape design plan and examples include, but are not limited to: are provide in Section 492.16.
(A) infiltration beds, swales, and basins that allow water to collect and soak into the ground;
(B) constructed wetlands and retention ponds that retain water, handle excess flow, and filter pollutants; and
(C) pervious or porous surfaces (e.g., permeable pavers or blocks, pervious or porous concrete, etc.) that minimize runoff.
15 (11) identify any applicable rain harvesting or catchment technologies (e.g., rain gardens, cisterns, etc.) as discussed in Section 492.16 and their 24-hour retention or infiltration capacity; (12) identify any applicable graywater discharge piping, system components and area(s) of distribution;
(13) (12) contain the following statement: “I have complied with the criteria of the ordinance and applied them for the efficient use of water in the landscape design plan”; and (14) (13) bear the signature of a licensed landscape architect, licensed landscape contractor, or any other person authorized to design a landscape. (See Sections 5500.1, 5615, 5641, 5641.1, 5641.2, 5641.3, 5641.4, 5641.5, 5641.6, 6701, 7027.5 of the Business and Professions Code, Section 832.27 of Title16 of the California Code of Regulations, and Section 6721 of the Food and Agriculture Code.)
Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code and Section 1351, Civil Code.
§ 492.7 Irrigation Design Plan.
(a) This section applies to landscaped areas requiring permanent irrigation, not areas that require temporary irrigation solely for the plant establishment period. For the efficient use of water, an irrigation system shall meet all the requirements listed in this section and the manufacturers’ recommendations.

The irrigation system and its related components shall be planned and designed to allow for proper installation, management, and maintenance. An irrigation design plan meeting the following design criteria shall be submitted as part of the Landscape Documentation Package. (1) System
(A) Dedicated Landscape water meters, defined as either a dedicated water service meter or private submeter, are highly recommended on landscape areas smaller than 5,000 square feet to facilitate water management shall be installed for all non-residential irrigated landscapes of 1,000 sq. ft. but not more than 5,000 sq.ft. (the level at which Water Code 535 applies) and residential irrigated landscapes of 5,000 sq. ft. or greater. A landscape water meter may be either:

1. a customer service meter dedicated to landscape use provided by the local water purveyor; or

2. a privately owned meter or submeter.
(B) Automatic irrigation controllers utilizing either evapotranspiration or soil moisture sensor data utilizing non-volatile memory shall be required for irrigation scheduling in all irrigation systems.
(C) If the water pressure is below or exceeds the recommended pressure of the specified irrigation devices, the installation of a pressure regulating device is required The irrigation systems shall be designed to ensure that the dynamic pressure at each emission device is within the manufacturer’s recommended pressure range for optimal performance.

1. If the static pressure is above or below the required dynamic pressure of the irrigation system, pressure-regulating devices such as inline pressure regulators, booster pumps, or other devices shall be installed to meet the required dynamic pressure of the irrigation system.

2. Static water pressure, dynamic or operating pressure and flow reading of the water supply shall be measured at the point of connection. These pressure and flow measurements shall be conducted at the design stage. If the measurements are not available at the design stage, the measurements shall be conducted at installation.
16 (D) Sensors (rain, freeze, wind, etc.), either integral or auxiliary, that suspend or alter irrigation operation during unfavorable weather conditions shall be required on all irrigation systems, as appropriate for local climatic conditions. Irrigation should be avoided during windy or freezing weather or during rain. (E) Manual shut-off valves (such as a gate valve, ball valve, or butterfly valve) shall be required, as close as possible to the point of connection of the water supply, to minimize water loss in case of an emergency (such as a main line break) or routine repair. (F) Backflow prevention devices shall be required to protect the water supply from contamination by the irrigation system. A project applicant shall refer to the applicable local agency code (i.e., public health) for additional backflow prevention requirements. (G) High Fflow sensors that detect and report high flow conditions created by system damage or malfunction are recommended required for all on non-residential landscapes and residential landscapes of 5000 sq. ft. or larger.
(H) Master shut-off valves are required on all projects except landscapes that make use of technologies that allow for the individual control of sprinklers that are individually pressurized in a system equipped with low pressure shut down features. (I) (H) The irrigation system shall be designed to prevent runoff, low head drainage, overspray, or other similar conditions where irrigation water flows onto non-targeted areas, such as adjacent property, non-irrigated areas, hardscapes, roadways, or structures. (J) (I) Relevant information from the soil management plan, such as soil type and infiltration rate, shall be utilized when designing irrigation systems. (K) (J) The design of the irrigation system shall conform to the hydrozones of the landscape design plan.
(L) (K) The irrigation system must be designed and installed to meet, at a minimum, the irrigation efficiency criteria as described in Section 492.4 regarding the Maximum Applied Water Allowance.
(M) All irrigation emission devices must meet the requirements set in the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers’/International Code Council’s (ASABE/ICC) 802-2014 “Landscape Irrigation Sprinkler and Emitter Standard, All sprinkler heads installed in the landscape must document a distribution uniformity low quarter of 0.65 or higher using the protocol defined in ASABE/ICC 802-2014.
(N) (L) It is highly recommended that the project applicant or local agency inquire with the local water purveyor about peak water operating demands (on the water supply system) or water restrictions that may impact the effectiveness of the irrigation system. (O) (M) In mulched planting areas, the use of low volume irrigation is required to maximize water infiltration into the root zone.
(P) (N) Sprinkler heads and other emission devices shall have matched precipitation rates, unless otherwise directed by the manufacturer’s recommendations. (Q) (O) Head to head coverage is recommended. However, sprinkler spacing shall be designed to achieve the highest possible distribution uniformity using the manufacturer’s recommendations.
(R) (P) Swing joints or other riser-protection components are required on all risers subject to damage that are adjacent to hardscapes or in high traffic areas of turfgrass. (S) (Q) Check valves or anti-drain valves are required for all irrigation systems on all sprinkler heads where low point drainage could occur.
(T) (R) Narrow or irregularly shaped areas, including turf, Areas less than teneight (810) feet in width in any direction shall be irrigated with subsurface irrigation or low volume irrigation system. other means that produces no runoff or overspray. 17 (U) (S) Overhead irrigation shall not be permitted within 24 inches of any non-permeable surface. Allowable irrigation within the setback from non-permeable surfaces may include drip, drip line, or other low flow non-spray technology. The setback area may be planted or unplanted. The surfacing of the setback may be mulch, gravel, or other porous material. These restrictions may be modified if:

1. the landscape area is adjacent to permeable surfacing and no runoff occurs; or

2. the adjacent non-permeable surfaces are designed and constructed to drain entirely to landscaping; or

3. the irrigation designer specifies an alternative design or technology, as part of the Landscape Documentation Package and clearly demonstrates strict adherence to irrigation system design criteria in Section 492.7 (a)(1)(IH). Prevention of overspray and runoff must be confirmed during the irrigation audit. (V) Slopes greater than 25% shall not be irrigated with an irrigation system with a precipitation application rate exceeding 0.75 inches per hour. This restriction may be modified if the landscape designer specifies an alternative design or technology, as part of the Landscape Documentation Package, and clearly demonstrates no runoff or erosion will occur. Prevention of runoff and erosion must be confirmed during the irrigation audit.
(2) Hydrozone
(A) Each valve shall irrigate a hydrozone with similar site, slope, sun exposure, soil conditions, and plant materials with similar water use. (B) Sprinkler heads and other emission devices shall be selected based on what is appropriate for the plant type within that hydrozone.
(C) Where feasible, trees shall be placed on separate valves from shrubs, groundcovers, and turf to facilitate the appropriate irrigation of trees. The mature size and extent of the root zone shall be considered when designing irrigation for the tree. (D) Individual hydrozones that mix plants of moderate and low water use, or moderate and high water use, may be allowed if:

1. plant factor calculation is based on the proportions of the respective plant water uses and their plant factor; or

2. the plant factor of the higher water using plant is used for calculations. (E) Individual hydrozones that mix high and low water use plants shall not be permitted. (F) On the landscape design plan and irrigation design plan, hydrozone areas shall be designated by number, letter, or other designation. On the irrigation design plan, designate the areas irrigated by each valve, and assign a number to each valve. Use this valve number in the Hydrozone Information Table (see Appendix B Section A). This table can also assist with the irrigation audit and programming the controller. (b) The irrigation design plan, at a minimum, shall contain:
(1) location and size of separate water meters for landscape; (2) location, type and size of all components of the irrigation system, including controllers, main and lateral lines, valves, sprinkler heads, moisture sensing devices, rain switches, quick couplers, pressure regulators, and backflow prevention devices;
(3) static water pressure at the point of connection to the public water supply; (4) flow rate (gallons per minute), application rate (inches per hour), and design operating pressure (pressure per square inch) for each station;
(5) recycled water irrigation systems as specified in Section 492.14; (6) the following statement: “I have complied with the criteria of the ordinance and applied them accordingly for the efficient use of water in the irrigation design plan”; and (7) the signature of a licensed landscape architect, certified irrigation designer, licensed landscape contractor, or any other person authorized to design an irrigation system. (See Sections 18 5500.1, 5615, 5641, 5641.1, 5641.2, 5641.3, 5641.4, 5641.5, 5641.6, 6701, 7027.5 of the Business and Professions Code, Section 832.27 of Title 16 of the California Code of Regulations, and Section 6721 of the Food and Agricultural Code.) Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.8 Grading Design Plan.
(a) For the efficient use of water, grading of a project site shall be designed to minimize soil erosion, runoff, and water waste. A grading plan shall be submitted as part of the Landscape Documentation Package. A comprehensive grading plan prepared by a civil engineer for other local agency permits satisfies this requirement.
(1) The project applicant shall submit a landscape grading plan that indicates finished configurations and elevations of the landscape area including:
(A) height of graded slopes;
(B) drainage patterns;
(C) pad elevations;
(D) finish grade; and
(E) stormwater retention improvements, if applicable.
(2) To prevent excessive erosion and runoff, it is highly recommended that project applicants:
(A) grade so that all irrigation and normal rainfall remains within property lines and does not drain on to non-permeable hardscapes;
(B) avoid disruption of natural drainage patterns and undisturbed soil; and (C) avoid soil compaction in landscape areas.
(3) The grading design plan shall contain the following statement: “I have complied with the criteria of the ordinance and applied them accordingly for the efficient use of water in the grading design plan” and shall bear the signature of a licensed professional as authorized by law.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.9 Certificate of Completion.
(a) The Certificate of Completion (see Appendix C for a sample certificate) shall include the following six (6) elements:
(1) project information sheet that contains:
(A) date;
(B) project name;
(C) project applicant name, telephone, and mailing address; (D) project address and location; and
(E) property owner name, telephone, and mailing address; (2) certification by either the signer of the landscape design plan, the signer of the irrigation design plan, or the licensed landscape contractor that the landscape project has been installed per the approved Landscape Documentation Package;
(A) where there have been significant changes made in the field during construction, these “as-built” or record drawings shall be included with the certification; (B) A diagram of the irrigation plan showing hydrozones shall be kept with the irrigation controller for subsequent management purposes.
(3) irrigation scheduling parameters used to set the controller (see Section 492.10); (4) landscape and irrigation maintenance schedule (see Section 492.11); (5) irrigation audit report (see Section 492.12); and
(6) soil analysis report, if not submitted with Landscape Documentation Package, and documentation verifying implementation of soil report recommendations (see Section 492.5). 19 (b) The project applicant shall:
(1) submit the signed Certificate of Completion to the local agency for review; (2) ensure that copies of the approved Certificate of Completion are submitted to the local water purveyor and property owner or his or her designee.
(c) The local agency shall:
(1) receive the signed Certificate of Completion from the project applicant; (2) approve or deny the Certificate of Completion. If the Certificate of Completion is denied, the local agency shall provide information to the project applicant regarding reapplication, appeal, or other assistance.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.10 Irrigation Scheduling.
(a) For the efficient use of water, all irrigation schedules shall be developed, managed, and evaluated to utilize the minimum amount of water required to maintain plant health. Irrigation schedules shall meet the following criteria:
(1) Irrigation scheduling shall be regulated by automatic irrigation controllers. (2) Overhead irrigation shall be scheduled between 8:00 p.m. and 10:00 a.m. unless weather conditions prevent it. If allowable hours of irrigation differ from the local water purveyor, the stricter of the two shall apply. Operation of the irrigation system outside the normal watering window is allowed for auditing and system maintenance.
(3) For implementation of the irrigation schedule, particular attention must be paid to irrigation run times, emission device, flow rate, and current reference evapotranspiration, so that applied water meets the Estimated Total Water Use. Total annual applied water shall be less than or equal to Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA). Actual irrigation schedules shall be regulated by automatic irrigation controllers using current reference evapotranspiration data (e.g., CIMIS) or soil moisture sensor data.
(4) Parameters used to set the automatic controller shall be developed and submitted for each of the following:
(A) the plant establishment period;
(B) the established landscape; and
(C) temporarily irrigated areas.
(5) Each irrigation schedule shall consider for each station all of the following that apply:
(A) irrigation interval (days between irrigation);
(B) irrigation run times (hours or minutes per irrigation event to avoid runoff); (C) number of cycle starts required for each irrigation event to avoid runoff; (D) amount of applied water scheduled to be applied on a monthly basis; (E) application rate setting;
(F) root depth setting;
(G) plant type setting;
(H) soil type;
(I) slope factor setting;
(J) shade factor setting; and
(K) irrigation uniformity or efficiency setting.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.11 Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule. (a) Landscapes shall be maintained to ensure water use efficiency. A regular maintenance schedule shall be submitted with the Certificate of Completion.
20 (b) A regular maintenance schedule shall include, but not be limited to, routine inspection; auditing, adjustment and repair of the irrigation system and its components; aerating and dethatching turf areas; topdressing with compost, replenishing mulch; fertilizing; pruning; weeding in all landscape areas, and removing and obstructions to emission devices. Operation of the irrigation system outside the normal watering window is allowed for auditing and system maintenance. (c) Repair of all irrigation equipment shall be done with the originally installed components or their equivalents or with components with greater efficiency. (d) A project applicant is encouraged to implement established landscape industry sustainable Best Practices or environmentally-friendly practices for overall all landscape maintenance activities.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.12 Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis. (a) All landscape irrigation audits shall be conducted by a local agency landscape irrigation auditor or a third party certified landscape irrigation auditor. Landscape audits shall not be conducted by the person who designed the landscape or installed the landscape
(b) In large projects or projects with multiple landscape installations (i.e. production home developments) an auditing rate of 1 in 7 lots or approximately 15% will satisfy this requirement. (b) (c)For new construction and rehabilitated landscape projects installed after January 1, 2010December 1, 2015, as described in Section 490.1:
(1) the project applicant shall submit an irrigation audit report with the Certificate of Completion to the local agency that may include, but is not limited to: inspection, system tune-up, system test with distribution uniformity, reporting overspray or run off that causes overland flow, and preparation of an irrigation schedule, including configuring irrigation controllers with application rate, soil types, plant factors, slope, exposure and any other factors necessary for accurate programming;
(2) the local agency shall administer programs that may include, but not be limited to, irrigation water use analysis, irrigation audits, and irrigation surveys for compliance with the Maximum Applied Water Allowance.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.13 Irrigation Efficiency.
(a) For the purpose of determining Maximum Applied Water Allowance Estimated Total Water Use, average irrigation efficiency is assumed to be 0.75 0.71 for overhead spray devices and 0.81 for drip system devices. Irrigation systems shall be designed, maintained, and managed to meet or exceed a sitewiden average landscape irrigation efficiency of 0.71.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.14 Recycled Water.
(a) The installation of recycled water irrigation systems shall allow for the current and future use of recycled water, unless a written exemption has been granted as described in Section 492.14(b). (b) Irrigation systems and decorative water features shall use recycled water unless a written exemption has been granted by the local water purveyor stating that recycled water meeting all public health codes and standards is not available and will not be available for the foreseeable future. (c) (b) All recycled water irrigation systems shall be designed and operated in accordance with all applicable local and State laws.
(d) (c) Landscapes using recycled water are considered Special Landscape Areas. The ET Adjustment Factor for new and existing (non-rehabilitated) Special Landscape Areas shall not exceed 1.0. 21 Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.15 Graywater Systems.
(a) Graywater systems promote the efficient use of water and are encouraged to assist in on-site landscape irrigation. All graywater systems shall conform to the California Plumbing Code (Title 24, Part 5, Chapter 16) and any applicable local ordinance standards. Refer to § 490.1 (d) for the applicability of this ordinance to landscape areas less than 2,500 square feet with the Estimated Total Water Use met entirely by graywater.
§ 492.165 Stormwater Management and Rainwater Retention. (a) Stormwater management practices minimize runoff and increase infiltration which recharges groundwater and improves water quality. Implementing stormwater best management practices into the landscape and grading design plans to minimize runoff and to increase on-site rainwater retention and infiltration are encouraged.
(b) Project applicants shall refer to the local agency or Regional Water Quality Control Board for information on any applicable stormwater technical requirements ordinances and stormwater management plans.
(c) All planted landscape areas are required to have friable soil to maximize water retention and infiltration. Refer to § 492.6(a)(3).
(d) It is strongly recommended that landscape areas be designed for capture and infiltration capacity that is sufficient to prevent runoff from impervious surfaces (i.e. roof and paved areas) from either: the one inch, 24-hour rain event or (2) the 85th percentile, 24-hour rain event, and/or additional capacity as required by any applicable local, regional, state or federal regulation. (e) It is recommended that storm water projects incorporate any of the following elements to improve on-site storm water and dry weather runoff capture and use:
• Grade impervious surfaces, such as driveways, during construction to drain to vegetated areas. • Minimize the area of impervious surfaces such as paved areas, roof and concrete driveways. • Incorporate pervious or porous surfaces (e.g., gravel, permeable pavers or blocks, pervious or porous concrete) that minimize runoff.
• Direct runoff from paved surfaces and roof areas into planting beds or landscaped areas to maximize site water capture and reuse.
• Incorporate rain gardens, cisterns, and other rain harvesting or catchment systems. • Incorporate infiltration beds, swales, basins and drywells to capture storm water and dry weather runoff and increase percolation into the soil.
• Consider constructed wetlands and ponds that retain water, equalize excess flow, and filter pollutants.
(c) Rain gardens, cisterns, and other landscapes features and practices that increase rainwater capture and create opportunities for infiltration and/or onsite storage are recommended.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.176 Public Education.
(a) Publications. Education is a critical component to promote the efficient use of water in landscapes.

The use of appropriate principles of design, installation, management and maintenance that save water is encouraged in the community.
(1) A local agency or water supplier/purveyor shall provide information to owners of permitted renovations and new single-family residential homes regarding the design, installation, management, and maintenance of water efficient landscapes based on a water budget. 22 (b) Model Homes. All model homes shall be landscaped and that are landscaped shall use signs and written information to demonstrate the principles of water efficient landscapes described in this ordinance.
(1) Signs shall be used to identify the model as an example of a water efficient landscape featuring elements such as hydrozones, irrigation equipment, and others that contribute to the overall water efficient theme. Signage shall include information about the site water use as designed per the local ordinance; specify who designed and installed the water efficient landscape; and demonstrate low water use approaches to landscaping such as using native plants, graywater systems, and rainwater catchment systems.
(2) Information shall be provided about designing, installing, managing, and maintaining water efficient landscapes
Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 492.187 Environmental Review.
(a) The local agency must comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as appropriate.

Note: Authority cited: Section 21082, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sections 21080, 21082, Public Resources Code.
§ 493. Provisions for Existing Landscapes.
(a) A local agency may by mutual agreement, designate another agency such as a water purveyor, to implement some or all of the requirements contained in this ordinance. Local agencies may collaborate with water purveyors to define each entity’s specific responsibilities relating to this ordinance.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 493.1 Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis. (a) This section, 493.1, shall apply to all existing landscapes that were installed before January 1, 2010 December 1, 2015 and are over one acre in size.
(1) For all landscapes in 493.1(a) that have a water meter, the local agency shall administer programs that may include, but not be limited to, irrigation water use analyses, irrigation surveys, and irrigation audits to evaluate water use and provide recommendations as necessary to reduce landscape water use to a level that does not exceed the Maximum Applied Water Allowance for existing landscapes. The Maximum Applied Water Allowance for existing landscapes shall be calculated as: MAWA = (0.8) (ETo)(LA)(0.62).
(2) For all landscapes in 493.1(a), that do not have a meter, the local agency shall administer programs that may include, but not be limited to, irrigation surveys and irrigation audits to evaluate water use and provide recommendations as necessary in order to prevent water waste. (b) All landscape irrigation audits shall be conducted by a certified landscape irrigation auditor.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 493.2 Water Waste Prevention.
(a) Local agencies shall prevent water waste resulting from inefficient landscape irrigation by prohibiting runoff from leaving the target landscape due to low head drainage, overspray, or other similar conditions where water flows onto adjacent property, non-irrigated areas, walks, roadways, parking lots, or structures. Penalties for violation of these prohibitions shall be established locally. (b) Restrictions regarding overspray and runoff may be modified if:
23 (1) the landscape area is adjacent to permeable surfacing and no runoff occurs; or (2) the adjacent non-permeable surfaces are designed and constructed to drain entirely to landscaping.

Note: Authority cited: Section 65594, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 494. Effective Precipitation.
(a) A local agency may consider Effective Precipitation (25% of annual precipitation) in tracking water use and may use the following equation to calculate Maximum Applied Water Allowance:

MAWA= (ETo - Eppt) (0.62) [(0. 70.55 x LA) + (0.30.45 x SLA)] for residential areas.

MAWA= (ETo - Eppt) (0.62) [(0.45 x LA) + (0.55 x SLA)] for non-residential areas.

Note: Authority Cited: Section 65595, Government Code. Reference: Section 65596, Government Code. § 495. Reporting.
(a) Local agencies shall report on implementation and enforcement by December 31, 2015. Local agencies responsible for administering individual ordinances shall report on their updated ordinance, while those agencies developing a regional ordinance shall report in their existing ordinance. Those agencies crafting a regional ordinances shall also report on their new ordinance by March 1, 2016.

Subsequently, reporting for all agencies will be due by January 31st of each year. Reports should be submitted as follows.
(b) Local agencies are to address the following:
(1) State whether you are adopting a single agency ordinance or a regional agency alliance ordinance, and the date of adoption or anticipated date of adoption. (2) Define the reporting period. The reporting period shall commence on December 1, 2015 and the end on December 28, 2015. For local agencies crafting regional ordinances with other agencies, there shall be an additional reporting period commencing on February 1, 2016 and ending on February 28, 2016. In subsequent years, all local agency reporting will be for the calendar year.
(3) State if using a locally modified Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO) or the MWELO. If using a locally modified WELO, how is it different than MWELO, is it at least as efficient as MWELO, and are there any exemptions specified? (4) State the entity responsible for implementing the ordinance. (5) State number and types of projects subject to the ordinance during the specified reporting period.
(6) State the total area (in square feet or acres) subject to the ordinance over the reporting period, if available.
(7) Provide the number of new housing starts, new commercial projects, and landscape retrofits during the reporting period.
(8) Describe the procedure for review of projects subject to the ordinance. (9) Describe actions taken to verify compliance. Is a plan check performed; if so, by what entity? Is a site inspection performed; if so, by what entity? Is a post-installation audit required; if so, by whom?
(10) Describe enforcement measures.
(11) Explain challenges to implementing and enforcing the ordinance. (12) Describe educational and other needs to properly apply the ordinance. 24 Appendices.

Appendix A. Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) Table.

County and City Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
ETo

ALAMEDA
Fremont 1.5 1.9 3.4 4.7 5.4 6.3 6.7 6.0 4.5 3.4 1.8 1.5 47.0 Livermore 1.2 1.5 2.9 4.4 5.9 6.6 7.4 6.4 5.3 3.2 1.5 0.9 47.2 Oakland 1.5 1.5 2.8 3.9 5.1 5.3 6.0 5.5 4.8 3.1 1.4 0.9 41.8 Oakland Foothills 1.1 1.4 2.7 3.7 5.1 6.4 5.8 4.9 3.6 2.6 1.4 1.0 39.6 Pleasanton 0.8 1.5 2.9 4.4 5.6 6.7 7.4 6.4 4.7 3.3 1.5 1.0 46.2 Union City 1.4 1.8 3.1 4.2 5.4 5.9 6.4 5.7 4.4 3.1 1.5 1.2 44.2 ALPINE
Markleeville 0.7 0.9 2.0 3.5 5.0 6.1 7.3 6.4 4.4 2.6 1.2 0.5 40.6 AMADOR
Jackson 1.2 1.5 2.8 4.4 6.0 7.2 7.9 7.2 5.3 3.2 1.4 0.9 48.9 Shanandoah Valley 1.0 1.7 2.9 4.4 5.6 6.8 7.9 7.1 5.2 3.6 1.7 1.0 48.8 BUTTE
Chico 1.2 1.8 2.9 4.7 6.1 7.4 8.5 7.3 5.4 3.7 1.7 1.0 51.7 Durham 1.1 1.8 3.2 5.0 6.5 7.4 7.8 6.9 5.3 3.6 1.7 1.0 51.1 Gridley 1.2 1.8 3.0 4.7 6.1 7.7 8.5 7.1 5.4 3.7 1.7 1.0 51.9 Oroville 1.2 1.7 2.8 4.7 6.1 7.6 8.5 7.3 5.3 3.7 1.7 1.0 51.5

CALAVERAS
San Andreas 1.2 1.5 2.8 4.4 6.0 7.3 7.9 7.0 5.3 3.2 1.4 0.7 48.8 COLUSA
Colusa 1.0 1.7 3.4 5.0 6.4 7.6 8.3 7.2 5.4 3.8 1.8 1.1 52.8 Williams 1.2 1.7 2.9 4.5 6.1 7.2 8.5 7.3 5.3 3.4 1.6 1.0 50.8

CONTRA COSTA
Benicia 1.3 1.4 2.7 3.8 4.9 5.0 6.4 5.5 4.4 2.9 1.2 0.7 40.3 Brentwood 1.0 1.5 2.9 4.5 6.1 7.1 7.9 6.7 5.2 3.2 1.4 0.7 48.3 Concord 1.1 1.4 2.4 4.0 5.5 5.9 7.0 6.0 4.8 3.2 1.3 0.7 43.4 Courtland 0.9 1.5 2.9 4.4 6.1 6.9 7.9 6.7 5.3 3.2 1.4 0.7 48.0 Martinez 1.2 1.4 2.4 3.9 5.3 5.6 6.7 5.6 4.7 3.1 1.2 0.7 41.8 Moraga 1.2 1.5 3.4 4.2 5.5 6.1 6.7 5.9 4.6 3.2 1.6 1.0 44.9 Pittsburg 1.0 1.5 2.8 4.1 5.6 6.4 7.4 6.4 5.0 3.2 1.3 0.7 45.4 Walnut Creek 0.8 1.5 2.9 4.4 5.6 6.7 7.4 6.4 4.7 3.3 1.5 1.0 46.2

DEL NORTE
Crescent City 0.5 0.9 2.0 3.0 3.7 3.5 4.3 3.7 3.0 2.0 0.9 0.5 27.7

EL DORADO
Camino 0.9 1.7 2.5 3.9 5.9 7.2 7.8 6.8 5.1 3.1 1.5 0.9 47.3 FRESNO
Clovis 1.0 1.5 3.2 4.8 6.4 7.7 8.5 7.3 5.3 3.4 1.4 0.7 51.4 Coalinga 1.2 1.7 3.1 4.6 6.2 7.2 8.5 7.3 5.3 3.4 1.6 0.7 50.9 Firebaugh 1.0 1.8 3.7 5.7 7.3 8.1 8.2 7.2 5.5 3.9 2.0 1.1 55.4 FivePoints 1.3 2.0 4.0 6.1 7.7 8.5 8.7 8.0 6.2 4.5 2.4 1.2 60.4 Fresno 0.9 1.7 3.3 4.8 6.7 7.8 8.4 7.1 5.2 3.2 1.4 0.6 51.1 Fresno State 0.9 1.6 3.2 5.2 7.0 8.0 8.7 7.6 5.4 3.6 1.7 0.9 53.7 Friant 1.2 1.5 3.1 4.7 6.4 7.7 8.5 7.3 5.3 3.4 1.4 0.7 51.3 Kerman 0.9 1.5 3.2 4.8 6.6 7.7 8.4 7.2 5.3 3.4 1.4 0.7 51.2 Kingsburg 1.0 1.5 3.4 4.8 6.6 7.7 8.4 7.2 5.3 3.4 1.4 0.7 51.6 Mendota 1.5 2.5 4.6 6.2 7.9 8.6 8.8 7.5 5.9 4.5 2.4 1.5 61.7 Orange Cove 1.2 1.9 3.5 4.7 7.4 8.5 8.9 7.9 5.9 3.7 1.8 1.2 56.7 25 Appendix A. Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) Table.

County and City Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
ETo
Panoche 1.1 2.0 4.0 5.6 7.8 8.5 8.3 7.3 5.6 3.9 1.8 1.2 57.2 Parlier 1.0 1.9 3.6 5.2 6.8 7.6 8.1 7.0 5.1 3.4 1.7 0.9 52.0 Reedley 1.1 1.5 3.2 4.7 6.4 7.7 8.5 7.3 5.3 3.4 1.4 0.7 51.3 Westlands 0.9 1.7 3.8 6.3 8.0 8.6 8.6 7.8 5.9 4.3 2.1 1.1 58.8 GLENN
Orland 1.1 1.8 3.4 5.0 6.4 7.5 7.9 6.7 5.3 3.9 1.8 1.4 52.1 Willows 1.2 1.7 2.9 4.7 6.1 7.2 8.5 7.3 5.3 3.6 1.7 1.0 51.3

HUMBOLDT
Eureka 0.5 1.1 2.0 3.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.0 2.0 0.9 0.5 27.5 Ferndale 0.5 1.1 2.0 3.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.0 2.0 0.9 0.5 27.5 Garberville 0.6 1.2 2.2 3.1 4.5 5.0 5.5 4.9 3.8 2.4 1.0 0.7 34.9 Hoopa 0.5 1.1 2.1 3.0 4.4 5.4 6.1 5.1 3.8 2.4 0.9 0.7 35.6

IMPERIAL
Brawley 2.8 3.8 5.9 8.0 10.4 11.5 11.7 10.0 8.4 6.2 3.5 2.1 84.2 Calipatria/Mulberry 2.4 3.2 5.1 6.8 8.6 9.2 9.2 8.6 7.0 5.2 3.1 2.3 70.7 El Centro 2.7 3.5 5.6 7.9 10.1 11.1 11.6 9.5 8.3 6.1 3.3 2.0 81.7 Holtville 2.8 3.8 5.9 7.9 10.4 11.6 12.0 10.0 8.6 6.2 3.5 2.1 84.7 Meloland 2.5 3.2 5.5 7.5 8.9 9.2 9.0 8.5 6.8 5.3 3.1 2.2 71.6 Palo Verde II 2.5 3.3 5.7 6.9 8.5 8.9 8.6 7.9 6.2 4.5 2.9 2.3 68.2 Seeley 2.7 3.5 5.9 7.7 9.7 10.1 9.3 8.3 6.9 5.5 3.4 2.2 75.4 Westmoreland 2.4 3.3 5.3 6.9 8.7 9.6 9.6 8.7 6.9 5.0 3.0 2.2 71.4 Yuma 2.5 3.4 5.3 6.9 8.7 9.6 9.6 8.7 6.9 5.0 3.0 2.2 71.6 INYO
Bishop 1.7 2.7 4.8 6.7 8.2 10.9 7.4 9.6 7.4 4.8 2.5 1.6 68.3 Death Valley Jct 2.2 3.3 5.4 7.7 9.8 11.1 11.4 10.1 8.3 5.4 2.9 1.7 79.1 Independence 1.7 2.7 3.4 6.6 8.5 9.5 9.8 8.5 7.1 3.9 2.0 1.5 65.2 Lower Haiwee Res. 1.8 2.7 4.4 7.1 8.5 9.5 9.8 8.5 7.1 4.2 2.6 1.5 67.6 Oasis 2.7 2.8 5.9 8.0 10.4 11.7 11.6 10.0 8.4 6.2 3.4 2.1 83.1 KERN
Arvin 1.2 1.8 3.5 4.7 6.6 7.4 8.1 7.3 5.3 3.4 1.7 1.0 51.9 Bakersfield 1.0 1.8 3.5 4.7 6.6 7.7 8.5 7.3 5.3 3.5 1.6 0.9 52.4 Bakersfield/Bonanza 1.2 2.2 3.7 5.7 7.4 8.2 8.7 7.8 5.7 4.0 2.1 1.2 57.9 Bakersfield/Greenlee 1.2 2.2 3.7 5.7 7.4 8.2 8.7 7.8 5.7 4.0 2.1 1.2 57.9 Belridge 1.4 2.2 4.1 5.5 7.7 8.5 8.6 7.8 6.0 3.8 2.0 1.5 59.2 Blackwells Corner 1.4 2.1 3.8 5.4 7.0 7.8 8.5 7.7 5.8 3.9 1.9 1.2 56.6 Buttonwillow 1.0 1.8 3.2 4.7 6.6 7.7 8.5 7.3 5.4 3.4 1.5 0.9 52.0 China Lake 2.1 3.2 5.3 7.7 9.2 10.0 11.0 9.8 7.3 4.9 2.7 1.7 74.8 Delano 0.9 1.8 3.4 4.7 6.6 7.7 8.5 7.3 5.4 3.4 1.4 0.7 52.0 Famoso 1.3 1.9 3.5 4.8 6.7 7.6 8.0 7.3 5.5 3.5 1.7 1.3 53.1 Grapevine 1.3 1.8 3.1 4.4 5.6 6.8 7.6 6.8 5.9 3.4 1.9 1.0 49.5 Inyokern 2.0 3.1 4.9 7.3 8.5 9.7 11.0 9.4 7.1 5.1 2.6 1.7 72.4 Isabella Dam 1.2 1.4 2.8 4.4 5.8 7.3 7.9 7.0 5.0 3.2 1.7 0.9 48.4 Lamont 1.3 2.4 4.4 4.6 6.5 7.0 8.8 7.6 5.7 3.7 1.6 0.8 54.4 Lost Hills 1.6 2.2 3.7 5.1 6.8 7.8 8.7 7.8 5.7 4.0 2.1 1.6 57.1 McFarland/Kern 1.2 2.1 3.7 5.6 7.3 8.0 8.3 7.4 5.6 4.1 2.0 1.2 56.5 Shafter 1.0 1.7 3.4 5.0 6.6 7.7 8.3 7.3 5.4 3.4 1.5 0.9 52.1 Taft 1.3 1.8 3.1 4.3 6.2 7.3 8.5 7.3 5.4 3.4 1.7 1.0 51.2 Tehachapi 1.4 1.8 3.2 5.0 6.1 7.7 7.9 7.3 5.9 3.4 2.1 1.2 52.9 26 Appendix A. Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) Table.

County and City Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
ETo
KINGS
Caruthers 1.6 2.5 4.0 5.7 7.8 8.7 9.3 8.4 6.3 4.4 2.4 1.6 62.7 Corcoran 1.6 2.2 3.7 5.1 6.8 7.8 8.7 7.8 5.7 4.0 2.1 1.6 57.1 Hanford 0.9 1.5 3.4 5.0 6.6 7.7 8.3 7.2 5.4 3.4 1.4 0.7 51.5 Kettleman 1.1 2.0 4.0 6.0 7.5 8.5 9.1 8.2 6.1 4.5 2.2 1.1 60.2 Lemoore 0.9 1.5 3.4 5.0 6.6 7.7 8.3 7.3 5.4 3.4 1.4 0.7 51.7 Stratford 0.9 1.9 3.9 6.1 7.8 8.6 8.8 7.7 5.9 4.1 2.1 1.0 58.7 LAKE
Lakeport 1.1 1.3 2.6 3.5 5.1 6.0 7.3 6.1 4.7 2.9 1.2 0.9 42.8 Lower Lake 1.2 1.4 2.7 4.5 5.3 6.3 7.4 6.4 5.0 3.1 1.3 0.9 45.4 LASSEN
Buntingville 1.0 1.7 3.5 4.9 6.2 7.3 8.4 7.5 5.4 3.4 1.5 0.9 51.8 Ravendale 0.6 1.1 2.3 4.1 5.6 6.7 7.9 7.3 4.7 2.8 1.2 0.5 44.9 Susanville 0.7 1.0 2.2 4.1 5.6 6.5 7.8 7.0 4.6 2.8 1.2 0.5 44.0

LOS ANGELES
Burbank 2.1 2.8 3.7 4.7 5.1 6.0 6.6 6.7 5.4 4.0 2.6 2.0 51.7 Claremont 2.0 2.3 3.4 4.6 5.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 5.3 4.0 2.7 2.1 51.3 El Dorado 1.7 2.2 3.6 4.8 5.1 5.7 5.9 5.9 4.4 3.2 2.2 1.7 46.3 Glendale 2.0 2.2 3.3 3.8 4.7 4.8 5.7 5.6 4.3 3.3 2.2 1.8 43.7 Glendora 2.0 2.5 3.6 4.9 5.4 6.1 7.3 6.8 5.7 4.2 2.6 2.0 53.1 Gorman 1.6 2.2 3.4 4.6 5.5 7.4 7.7 7.1 5.9 3.6 2.4 1.1 52.4 Hollywood Hills 2.1 2.2 3.8 5.4 6.0 6.5 6.7 6.4 5.2 3.7 2.8 2.1 52.8 Lancaster 2.1 3.0 4.6 5.9 8.5 9.7 11.0 9.8 7.3 4.6 2.8 1.7 71.1 Long Beach 1.8 2.1 3.3 3.9 4.5 4.3 5.3 4.7 3.7 2.8 1.8 1.5 39.7 Los Angeles 2.2 2.7 3.7 4.7 5.5 5.8 6.2 5.9 5.0 3.9 2.6 1.9 50.1 Monrovia 2.2 2.3 3.8 4.3 5.5 5.9 6.9 6.4 5.1 3.2 2.5 2.0 50.2 Palmdale 2.0 2.6 4.6 6.2 7.3 8.9 9.8 9.0 6.5 4.7 2.7 2.1 66.2 Pasadena 2.1 2.7 3.7 4.7 5.1 6.0 7.1 6.7 5.6 4.2 2.6 2.0 52.3 Pearblossom 1.7 2.4 3.7 4.7 7.3 7.7 9.9 7.9 6.4 4.0 2.6 1.6 59.9 Pomona 1.7 2.0 3.4 4.5 5.0 5.8 6.5 6.4 4.7 3.5 2.3 1.7 47.5 Redondo Beach 2.2 2.4 3.3 3.8 4.5 4.7 5.4 4.8 4.4 2.8 2.4 2.0 42.6 San Fernando 2.0 2.7 3.5 4.6 5.5 5.9 7.3 6.7 5.3 3.9 2.6 2.0 52.0 Santa Clarita 2.8 2.8 4.1 5.6 6.0 6.8 7.6 7.8 5.8 5.2 3.7 3.2 61.5 Santa Monica 1.8 2.1 3.3 4.5 4.7 5.0 5.4 5.4 3.9 3.4 2.4 2.2 44.2 MADERA
Chowchilla 1.0 1.4 3.2 4.7 6.6 7.8 8.5 7.3 5.3 3.4 1.4 0.7 51.4 Madera 0.9 1.4 3.2 4.8 6.6 7.8 8.5 7.3 5.3 3.4 1.4 0.7 51.5 Raymond 1.2 1.5 3.0 4.6 6.1 7.6 8.4 7.3 5.2 3.4 1.4 0.7 50.5 MARIN
Black Point 1.1 1.7 3.0 4.2 5.2 6.2 6.6 5.8 4.3 2.8 1.3 0.9 43.0 Novato 1.3 1.5 2.4 3.5 4.4 6.0 5.9 5.4 4.4 2.8 1.4 0.7 39.8 Point San Pedro 1.1 1.7 3.0 4.2 5.2 6.2 6.6 5.8 4.3 2.8 1.3 0.9 43.0 San Rafael 1.2 1.3 2.4 3.3 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.3 2.7 1.3 0.7 35.8

MARIPOSA
Coulterville 1.1 1.5 2.8 4.4 5.9 7.3 8.1 7.0 5.3 3.4 1.4 0.7 48.8 Mariposa 1.1 1.5 2.8 4.4 5.9 7.4 8.2 7.1 5.0 3.4 1.4 0.7 49.0 Yosemite Village 0.7 1.0 2.3 3.7 5.1 6.5 7.1 6.1 4.4 2.9 1.1 0.6 41.4

MENDOCINO
27 Appendix A. Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) Table.

County and City Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
ETo
Fort Bragg 0.9 1.3 2.2 3.0 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.0 2.3 1.2 0.7 29.0 Hopland 1.1 1.3 2.6 3.4 5.0 5.9 6.5 5.7 4.5 2.8 1.3 0.7 40.9 Point Arena 1.0 1.3 2.3 3.0 3.7 3.9 3.7 3.7 3.0 2.3 1.2 0.7 29.6 Sanel Valley 1.0 1.6 3.0 4.6 6.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 5.2 3.4 1.4 0.9 49.1 Ukiah 1.0 1.3 2.6 3.3 5.0 5.8 6.7 5.9 4.5 2.8 1.3 0.7 40.9 MERCED
Kesterson 0.9 1.7 3.4 5.5 7.3 8.2 8.6 7.4 5.5 3.8 1.8 0.9 55.1 Los Banos 1.0 1.5 3.2 4.7 6.1 7.4 8.2 7.0 5.3 3.4 1.4 0.7 50.0 Merced 1.0 1.5 3.2 4.7 6.6 7.9 8.5 7.2 5.3 3.4 1.4 0.7 51.5 MODOC
Modoc/Alturas 0.9 1.4 2.8 3.7 5.1 6.2 7.5 6.6 4.6 2.8 1.2 0.7 43.2 MONO
Bridgeport 0.7 0.9 2.2 3.8 5.5 6.6 7.4 6.7 4.7 2.7 1.2 0.5 43.0

MONTEREY
Arroyo Seco 1.5 2.0 3.7 5.4 6.3 7.3 7.2 6.7 5.0 3.9 2.0 1.6 52.6 Castroville 1.4 1.7 3.0 4.2 4.6 4.8 4.0 3.8 3.0 2.6 1.6 1.4 36.2 Gonzales 1.3 1.7 3.4 4.7 5.4 6.3 6.3 5.9 4.4 3.4 1.9 1.3 45.7 Greenfield 1.8 2.2 3.4 4.8 5.6 6.3 6.5 6.2 4.8 3.7 2.4 1.8 49.5 King City 1.7 2.0 3.4 4.4 4.4 5.6 6.1 6.7 6.5 5.2 2.2 1.3 49.6 King City-Oasis Rd. 1.4 1.9 3.6 5.3 6.5 7.3 7.4 6.8 5.1 4.0 2.0 1.5 52.7 Long Valley 1.5 1.9 3.2 4.1 5.8 6.5 7.3 6.7 5.3 3.6 2.0 1.2 49.1 Monterey 1.7 1.8 2.7 3.5 4.0 4.1 4.3 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.5 36.0 Pajaro 1.8 2.2 3.7 4.8 5.3 5.7 5.6 5.3 4.3 3.4 2.4 1.8 46.1 Salinas 1.6 1.9 2.7 3.8 4.8 4.7 5.0 4.5 4.0 2.9 1.9 1.3 39.1 Salinas North 1.2 1.5 2.9 4.1 4.6 5.2 4.5 4.3 3.2 2.8 1.5 1.2 36.9 San Ardo 1.0 1.7 3.1 4.5 5.9 7.2 8.1 7.1 5.1 3.1 1.5 1.0 49.0 San Juan 1.8 2.1 3.4 4.6 5.3 5.7 5.5 4.9 3.8 3.2 2.2 1.9 44.2 Soledad 1.7 2.0 3.4 4.4 5.5 5.4 6.5 6.2 5.2 3.7 2.2 1.5 47.7 NAPA
Angwin 1.8 1.9 3.2 4.7 5.8 7.3 8.1 7.1 5.5 4.5 2.9 2.1 54.9 Carneros 0.8 1.5 3.1 4.6 5.5 6.6 6.9 6.2 4.7 3.5 1.4 1.0 45.8 Oakville 1.0 1.5 2.9 4.7 5.8 6.9 7.2 6.4 4.9 3.5 1.6 1.2 47.7 St Helena 1.2 1.5 2.8 3.9 5.1 6.1 7.0 6.2 4.8 3.1 1.4 0.9 44.1 Yountville 1.3 1.7 2.8 3.9 5.1 6.0 7.1 6.1 4.8 3.1 1.5 0.9 44.3 NEVADA
Grass Valley 1.1 1.5 2.6 4.0 5.7 7.1 7.9 7.1 5.3 3.2 1.5 0.9 48.0 Nevada City 1.1 1.5 2.6 3.9 5.8 6.9 7.9 7.0 5.3 3.2 1.4 0.9 47.4 ORANGE
Irvine 2.2 2.5 3.7 4.7 5.2 5.9 6.3 6.2 4.6 3.7 2.6 2.3 49.6 Laguna Beach 2.2 2.7 3.4 3.8 4.6 4.6 4.9 4.9 4.4 3.4 2.4 2.0 43.2 Santa Ana 2.2 2.7 3.7 4.5 4.6 5.4 6.2 6.1 4.7 3.7 2.5 2.0 48.2 PLACER
Auburn 1.2 1.7 2.8 4.4 6.1 7.4 8.3 7.3 5.4 3.4 1.6 1.0 50.6 Blue Canyon 0.7 1.1 2.1 3.4 4.8 6.0 7.2 6.1 4.6 2.9 0.9 0.6 40.5 Colfax 1.1 1.5 2.6 4.0 5.8 7.1 7.9 7.0 5.3 3.2 1.4 0.9 47.9 Roseville 1.1 1.7 3.1 4.7 6.2 7.7 8.5 7.3 5.6 3.7 1.7 1.0 52.2 Soda Springs 0.7 0.7 1.8 3.0 4.3 5.3 6.2 5.5 4.1 2.5 0.7 0.7 35.4 Tahoe City 0.7 0.7 1.7 3.0 4.3 5.4 6.1 5.6 4.1 2.4 0.8 0.6 35.5 28 Appendix A. Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) Table.

County and City Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
ETo
Truckee 0.7 0.7 1.7 3.2 4.4 5.4 6.4 5.7 4.1 2.4 0.8 0.6 36.2 PLUMAS
Portola 0.7 0.9 1.9 3.5 4.9 5.9 7.3 5.9 4.3 2.7 0.9 0.5 39.4 Quincy 0.7 0.9 2.2 3.5 4.9 5.9 7.3 5.9 4.4 2.8 1.2 0.5 40.2

RIVERSIDE
Beaumont 2.0 2.3 3.4 4.4 6.1 7.1 7.6 7.9 6.0 3.9 2.6 1.7 55.0 Blythe 2.4 3.3 5.3 6.9 8.7 9.6 9.6 8.7 6.9 5.0 3.0 2.2 71.4 Cathedral City 1.6 2.2 3.7 5.1 6.8 7.8 8.7 7.8 5.7 4.0 2.1 1.6 57.1 Coachella 2.9 4.4 6.2 8.4 10.5 11.9 12.3 10.1 8.9 6.2 3.8 2.4 88.1 Desert Center 2.9 4.1 6.4 8.5 11.0 12.1 12.2 11.1 9.0 6.4 3.9 2.6 90.0 Elsinore 2.1 2.8 3.9 4.4 5.9 7.1 7.6 7.0 5.8 3.9 2.6 1.9 55.0 Indio 3.1 3.6 6.5 8.3 10.5 11.0 10.8 9.7 8.3 5.9 3.7 2.7 83.9

RIVERSIDE
La Quinta 2.4 2.8 5.2 6.5 8.3 8.7 8.5 7.9 6.5 4.5 2.7 2.2 66.2 Mecca 2.6 3.3 5.7 7.2 8.6 9.0 8.8 8.2 6.8 5.0 3.2 2.4 70.8 Oasis 2.9 3.3 5.3 6.1 8.5 8.9 8.7 7.9 6.9 4.8 2.9 2.3 68.4 Palm Desert 2.5 3.4 5.3 6.9 8.7 9.6 9.6 8.7 6.9 5.0 3.0 2.2 71.6 Palm Springs 2.0 2.9 4.9 7.2 8.3 8.5 11.6 8.3 7.2 5.9 2.7 1.7 71.1 Rancho California 1.8 2.2 3.4 4.8 5.6 6.3 6.5 6.2 4.8 3.7 2.4 1.8 49.5 Rancho Mirage 2.4 3.3 5.3 6.9 8.7 9.6 9.6 8.7 6.9 5.0 3.0 2.2 71.4 Ripley 2.7 3.3 5.6 7.2 8.7 8.7 8.4 7.6 6.2 4.6 2.8 2.2 67.8 Salton Sea North 2.5 3.3 5.5 7.2 8.8 9.3 9.2 8.5 6.8 5.2 3.1 2.3 71.7 Temecula East II 2.3 2.4 4.1 4.9 6.4 7.0 7.8 7.4 5.7 4.1 2.6 2.2 56.7 Thermal 2.4 3.3 5.5 7.6 9.1 9.6 9.3 8.6 7.1 5.2 3.1 2.1 72.8 Riverside UC 2.5 2.9 4.2 5.3 5.9 6.6 7.2 6.9 5.4 4.1 2.9 2.6 56.4 Winchester 2.3 2.4 4.1 4.9 6.4 6.9 7.7 7.5 6.0 3.9 2.6 2.1 56.8

SACRAMENTO
Fair Oaks 1.0 1.6 3.4 4.1 6.5 7.5 8.1 7.1 5.2 3.4 1.5 1.0 50.5 Sacramento 1.0 1.8 3.2 4.7 6.4 7.7 8.4 7.2 5.4 3.7 1.7 0.9 51.9 Twitchell Island 1.2 1.8 3.9 5.3 7.4 8.8 9.1 7.8 5.9 3.8 1.7 1.2 57.9

SAN BENITO
Hollister 1.5 1.8 3.1 4.3 5.5 5.7 6.4 5.9 5.0 3.5 1.7 1.1 45.1 San Benito 1.2 1.6 3.1 4.6 5.6 6.4 6.9 6.5 4.8 3.7 1.7 1.2 47.2 San Juan Valley 1.4 1.8 3.4 4.5 6.0 6.7 7.1 6.4 5.0 3.5 1.8 1.4 49.1

SAN BERNARDINO
Baker 2.7 3.9 6.1 8.3 10.4 11.8 12.2 11.0 8.9 6.1 3.3 2.1 86.6 Barstow NE 2.2 2.9 5.3 6.9 9.0 10.1 9.9 8.9 6.8 4.8 2.7 2.1 71.7 Big Bear Lake 1.8 2.6 4.6 6.0 7.0 7.6 8.1 7.4 5.4 4.1 2.4 1.8 58.6 Chino 2.1 2.9 3.9 4.5 5.7 6.5 7.3 7.1 5.9 4.2 2.6 2.0 54.6 Crestline 1.5 1.9 3.3 4.4 5.5 6.6 7.8 7.1 5.4 3.5 2.2 1.6 50.8 Lake Arrowhead 1.8 2.6 4.6 6.0 7.0 7.6 8.1 7.4 5.4 4.1 2.4 1.8 58.6 Lucerne Valley 2.2 2.9 5.1 6.5 9.1 11.0 11.4 9.9 7.4 5.0 3.0 1.8 75.3 Needles 3.2 4.2 6.6 8.9 11.0 12.4 12.8 11.0 8.9 6.6 4.0 2.7 92.1 Newberry Springs 2.1 2.9 5.3 8.4 9.8 10.9 11.1 9.9 7.6 5.2 3.1 2.0 78.2 San Bernardino 2.0 2.7 3.8 4.6 5.7 6.9 7.9 7.4 5.9 4.2 2.6 2.0 55.6 Twentynine Palms 2.6 3.6 5.9 7.9 10.1 11.2 11.2 10.3 8.6 5.9 3.4 2.2 82.9 Victorville 2.0 2.6 4.6 6.2 7.3 8.9 9.8 9.0 6.5 4.7 2.7 2.1 66.2 29 SAN DIEGO
Chula Vista 2.2 2.7 3.4 3.8 4.9 4.7 5.5 4.9 4.5 3.4 2.4 2.0 44.2 Escondido SPV 2.4 2.6 3.9 4.7 5.9 6.5 7.1 6.7 5.3 3.9 2.8 2.3 54.2 Miramar 2.3 2.5 3.7 4.1 5.1 5.4 6.1 5.8 4.5 3.3 2.4 2.1 47.1 Oceanside 2.2 2.7 3.4 3.7 4.9 4.6 4.6 5.1 4.1 3.3 2.4 2.0 42.9 Otay Lake 2.3 2.7 3.9 4.6 5.6 5.9 6.2 6.1 4.8 3.7 2.6 2.2 50.4 Pine Valley 1.5 2.4 3.8 5.1 6.0 7.0 7.8 7.3 6.0 4.0 2.2 1.7 54.8 Ramona 2.1 2.1 3.4 4.6 5.2 6.3 6.7 6.8 5.3 4.1 2.8 2.1 51.6 San Diego 2.1 2.4 3.4 4.6 5.1 5.3 5.7 5.6 4.3 3.6 2.4 2.0 46.5 Santee 2.1 2.7 3.7 4.5 5.5 6.1 6.6 6.2 5.4 3.8 2.6 2.0 51.1 Torrey Pines 2.2 2.3 3.4 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.6 4.7 3.8 2.8 2.0 2.0 39.8 Warner Springs 1.6 2.7 3.7 4.7 5.7 7.6 8.3 7.7 6.3 4.0 2.5 1.3 56.0

SAN FRANCISCO
San Francisco 1.5 1.3 2.4 3.0 3.7 4.6 4.9 4.8 4.1 2.8 1.3 0.7 35.1

SAN JOAQUIN
Farmington 1.5 1.5 2.9 4.7 6.2 7.6 8.1 6.8 5.3 3.3 1.4 0.7 50.0

SAN JOAQUIN
Lodi West 1.0 1.6 3.3 4.3 6.3 6.9 7.3 6.4 4.5 3.0 1.4 0.8 46.7 Manteca 0.9 1.7 3.4 5.0 6.5 7.5 8.0 7.1 5.2 3.3 1.6 0.9 51.2 Stockton 0.8 1.5 2.9 4.7 6.2 7.4 8.1 6.8 5.3 3.2 1.4 0.6 49.1 Tracy 1.0 1.5 2.9 4.5 6.1 7.3 7.9 6.7 5.3 3.2 1.3 0.7 48.5

SAN LUIS OBISPO
Arroyo Grande 2.0 2.2 3.2 3.8 4.3 4.7 4.3 4.6 3.8 3.2 2.4 1.7 40.0 Atascadero 1.2 1.5 2.8 3.9 4.5 6.0 6.7 6.2 5.0 3.2 1.7 1.0 43.7 Morro Bay 2.0 2.2 3.1 3.5 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.6 3.8 3.5 2.1 1.7 39.9 Nipomo 2.2 2.5 3.8 5.1 5.7 6.2 6.4 6.1 4.9 4.1 2.9 2.3 52.1 Paso Robles 1.6 2.0 3.2 4.3 5.5 6.3 7.3 6.7 5.1 3.7 2.1 1.4 49.0 San Luis Obispo 2.0 2.2 3.2 4.1 4.9 5.3 4.6 5.5 4.4 3.5 2.4 1.7 43.8 San Miguel 1.6 2.0 3.2 4.3 5.0 6.4 7.4 6.8 5.1 3.7 2.1 1.4 49.0 San Simeon 2.0 2.0 2.9 3.5 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.3 3.5 3.1 2.0 1.7 38.1

SAN MATEO
Hal Moon Bay 1.5 1.7 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.3 4.3 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.3 1.0 33.7 Redwood City 1.5 1.8 2.9 3.8 5.2 5.3 6.2 5.6 4.8 3.1 1.7 1.0 42.8 Woodside 1.8 2.2 3.4 4.8 5.6 6.3 6.5 6.2 4.8 3.7 2.4 1.8 49.5

SANTA BARBARA
Betteravia 2.1 2.6 4.0 5.2 6.0 5.9 5.8 5.4 4.1 3.3 2.7 2.1 49.1 Carpenteria 2.0 2.4 3.2 3.9 4.8 5.2 5.5 5.7 4.5 3.4 2.4 2.0 44.9 Cuyama 2.1 2.4 3.8 5.4 6.9 7.9 8.5 7.7 5.9 4.5 2.6 2.0 59.7 Goleta 2.1 2.5 3.9 5.1 5.7 5.7 5.4 5.4 4.2 3.2 2.8 2.2 48.1 Goleta Foothills 2.3 2.6 3.7 5.4 5.3 5.6 5.5 5.7 4.5 3.9 2.8 2.3 49.6 Guadalupe 2.0 2.2 3.2 3.7 4.9 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.1 3.3 2.4 1.7 41.1 Lompoc 2.0 2.2 3.2 3.7 4.8 4.6 4.9 4.8 3.9 3.2 2.4 1.7 41.1 Los Alamos 1.8 2.0 3.2 4.1 4.9 5.3 5.7 5.5 4.4 3.7 2.4 1.6 44.6 Santa Barbara 2.0 2.5 3.2 3.8 4.6 5.1 5.5 4.5 3.4 2.4 1.8 1.8 40.6 Santa Maria 1.8 2.3 3.7 5.1 5.7 5.8 5.6 5.3 4.2 3.5 2.4 1.9 47.4 Santa Ynez 1.7 2.2 3.5 5.0 5.8 6.2 6.4 6.0 4.5 3.6 2.2 1.7 48.7 Sisquoc 2.1 2.5 3.8 4.1 6.1 6.3 6.4 5.8 4.7 3.4 2.3 1.8 49.2 Solvang 2.0 2.0 3.3 4.3 5.0 5.6 6.1 5.6 4.4 3.7 2.2 1.6 45.6 30 SANTA CLARA
Gilroy 1.3 1.8 3.1 4.1 5.3 5.6 6.1 5.5 4.7 3.4 1.7 1.1 43.6 Los Gatos 1.5 1.8 2.8 3.9 5.0 5.6 6.2 5.5 4.7 3.2 1.7 1.1 42.9 Morgan Hill 1.5 1.8 3.4 4.2 6.3 7.0 7.1 6.0 5.1 3.7 1.9 1.4 49.5 Palo Alto 1.5 1.8 2.8 3.8 5.2 5.3 6.2 5.6 5.0 3.2 1.7 1.0 43.0 San Jose 1.5 1.8 3.1 4.1 5.5 5.8 6.5 5.9 5.2 3.3 1.8 1.0 45.3

SANTA CRUZ
De Laveaga 1.4 1.9 3.3 4.7 4.9 5.3 5.0 4.8 3.6 3.0 1.6 1.3 40.8 Green Valley Rd 1.2 1.8 3.2 4.5 4.6 5.4 5.2 5.0 3.7 3.1 1.6 1.3 40.6 Santa Cruz 1.5 1.8 2.6 3.5 4.3 4.4 4.8 4.4 3.8 2.8 1.7 1.2 36.6 Watsonville 1.5 1.8 2.7 3.7 4.6 4.5 4.9 4.2 4.0 2.9 1.8 1.2 37.7 Webb 1.8 2.2 3.7 4.8 5.3 5.7 5.6 5.3 4.3 3.4 2.4 1.8 46.2 SHASTA
Burney 0.7 1.0 2.1 3.5 4.9 5.9 7.4 6.4 4.4 2.9 0.9 0.6 40.9 Fall River Mills 0.6 1.0 2.1 3.7 5.0 6.1 7.8 6.7 4.6 2.8 0.9 0.5 41.8 Glenburn 0.6 1.0 2.1 3.7 5.0 6.3 7.8 6.7 4.7 2.8 0.9 0.6 42.1 McArthur 0.7 1.4 2.9 4.2 5.6 6.9 8.2 7.2 5.0 3.0 1.1 0.6 46.8 Redding 1.2 1.4 2.6 4.1 5.6 7.1 8.5 7.3 5.3 3.2 1.4 0.9 48.8 SIERRA
Downieville 0.7 1.0 2.3 3.5 5.0 6.0 7.4 6.2 4.7 2.8 0.9 0.6 41.3 Sierraville 0.7 1.1 2.2 3.2 4.5 5.9 7.3 6.4 4.3 2.6 0.9 0.5 39.6

SISKIYOU
Happy Camp 0.5 0.9 2.0 3.0 4.3 5.2 6.1 5.3 4.1 2.4 0.9 0.5 35.1 MacDoel 1.0 1.7 3.1 4.5 5.9 7.2 8.1 7.1 5.1 3.1 1.5 1.0 49.0 Mt Shasta 0.5 0.9 2.0 3.0 4.5 5.3 6.7 5.7 4.0 2.2 0.7 0.5 36.0 Tule lake FS 0.7 1.3 2.7 4.0 5.4 6.3 7.1 6.4 4.7 2.8 1.0 0.6 42.9 Weed 0.5 0.9 2.0 2.5 4.5 5.3 6.7 5.5 3.7 2.0 0.9 0.5 34.9 Yreka 0.6 0.9 2.1 3.0 4.9 5.8 7.3 6.5 4.3 2.5 0.9 0.5 39.2 SOLANO
Benicia 1.3 1.4 2.7 3.8 4.9 5.0 6.4 5.5 4.4 2.9 1.2 0.7 40.3 Dixon 0.7 1.4 3.2 5.2 6.3 7.6 8.2 7.2 5.5 4.3 1.6 1.1 52.1 Fairfield 1.1 1.7 2.8 4.0 5.5 6.1 7.8 6.0 4.8 3.1 1.4 0.9 45.2 Hastings Tract 1.6 2.2 3.7 5.1 6.8 7.8 8.7 7.8 5.7 4.0 2.1 1.6 57.1 Putah Creek 1.0 1.6 3.2 4.9 6.1 7.3 7.9 7.0 5.3 3.8 1.8 1.2 51.0 Rio Vista 0.9 1.7 2.8 4.4 5.9 6.7 7.9 6.5 5.1 3.2 1.3 0.7 47.0 Suisun Valley 0.6 1.3 3.0 4.7 5.8 7.0 7.7 6.8 5.3 3.8 1.4 0.9 48.3 Winters 0.9 1.7 3.3 5.0 6.4 7.5 7.9 7.0 5.2 3.5 1.6 1.0 51.0 SONOMA
Bennett Valley 1.1 1.7 3.2 4.1 5.5 6.5 6.6 5.7 4.5 3.1 1.5 0.9 44.4 Cloverdale 1.1 1.4 2.6 3.4 5.0 5.9 6.2 5.6 4.5 2.8 1.4 0.7 40.7 Fort Ross 1.2 1.4 2.2 3.0 3.7 4.5 4.2 4.3 3.4 2.4 1.2 0.5 31.9 Healdsburg 1.2 1.5 2.4 3.5 5.0 5.9 6.1 5.6 4.5 2.8 1.4 0.7 40.8 Lincoln 1.2 1.7 2.8 4.7 6.1 7.4 8.4 7.3 5.4 3.7 1.9 1.2 51.9 Petaluma 1.2 1.5 2.8 3.7 4.6 5.6 4.6 5.7 4.5 2.9 1.4 0.9 39.6 Santa Rosa 1.2 1.7 2.8 3.7 5.0 6.0 6.1 5.9 4.5 2.9 1.5 0.7 42.0 Valley of the Moon 1.0 1.6 3.0 4.5 5.6 6.6 7.1 6.3 4.7 3.3 1.5 1.0 46.1 Windsor 0.9 1.6 3.0 4.5 5.5 6.5 6.5 5.9 4.4 3.2 1.4 1.0 44.2

STANISLAUS
Denair 1.0 1.9 3.6 4.7 7.0 7.9 8.0 6.1 5.3 3.4 1.5 1.0 51.4 La Grange 1.2 1.5 3.1 4.7 6.2 7.7 8.5 7.3 5.3 3.4 1.4 0.7 51.2 Modesto 0.9 1.4 3.2 4.7 6.4 7.7 8.1 6.8 5.0 3.4 1.4 0.7 49.7 31 Newman 1.0 1.5 3.2 4.6 6.2 7.4 8.1 6.7 5.0 3.4 1.4 0.7 49.3 Oakdale 1.2 1.5 3.2 4.7 6.2 7.7 8.1 7.1 5.1 3.4 1.4 0.7 50.3 Patterson 1.3 2.1 4.2 5.4 7.9 8.6 8.2 6.6 5.8 4.0 1.9 1.3 57.3 Turlock 0.9 1.5 3.2 4.7 6.5 7.7 8.2 7.0 5.1 3.4 1.4 0.7 50.2 SUTTER
Nicolaus 0.9 1.6 3.2 4.9 6.3 7.5 8.0 6.9 5.2 3.4 1.5 0.9 50.2 Yuba City 1.3 2.1 2.8 4.4 5.7 7.2 7.1 6.1 4.7 3.2 1.2 0.9 46.7 TEHAMA
Corning 1.2 1.8 2.9 4.5 6.1 7.3 8.1 7.2 5.3 3.7 1.7 1.1 50.7 Gerber 1.0 1.8 3.5 5.0 6.6 7.9 8.7 7.4 5.8 4.1 1.8 1.1 54.7 Gerber Dryland 0.9 1.6 3.2 4.7 6.7 8.4 9.0 7.9 6.0 4.2 2.0 1.0 55.5 Red Bluff 1.2 1.8 2.9 4.4 5.9 7.4 8.5 7.3 5.4 3.5 1.7 1.0 51.1

TRINITY
Hay Fork 0.5 1.1 2.3 3.5 4.9 5.9 7.0 6.0 4.5 2.8 0.9 0.7 40.1 Weaverville 0.6 1.1 2.2 3.3 4.9 5.9 7.3 6.0 4.4 2.7 0.9 0.7 40.0 TULARE
Alpaugh 0.9 1.7 3.4 4.8 6.6 7.7 8.2 7.3 5.4 3.4 1.4 0.7 51.6 Badger 1.0 1.3 2.7 4.1 6.0 7.3 7.7 7.0 4.8 3.3 1.4 0.7 47.3 Delano 1.1 1.9 4.0 4.9 7.2 7.9 8.1 7.3 5.4 3.2 1.5 1.2 53.6 Dinuba 1.1 1.5 3.2 4.7 6.2 7.7 8.5 7.3 5.3 3.4 1.4 0.7 51.2 Lindcove 0.9 1.6 3.0 4.8 6.5 7.6 8.1 7.2 5.2 3.4 1.6 0.9 50.6 Porterville 1.2 1.8 3.4 4.7 6.6 7.7 8.5 7.3 5.3 3.4 1.4 0.7 52.1 Visalia 0.9 1.7 3.3 5.1 6.8 7.7 7.9 6.9 4.9 3.2 1.5 0.8 50.7

TUOLUMNE
Groveland 1.1 1.5 2.8 4.1 5.7 7.2 7.9 6.6 5.1 3.3 1.4 0.7 47.5 Sonora 1.1 1.5 2.8 4.1 5.8 7.2 7.9 6.7 5.1 3.2 1.4 0.7 47.6

VENTURA
Camarillo 2.2 2.5 3.7 4.3 5.0 5.2 5.9 5.4 4.2 3.0 2.5 2.1 46.1 Oxnard 2.2 2.5 3.2 3.7 4.4 4.6 5.4 4.8 4.0 3.3 2.4 2.0 42.3 Piru 2.8 2.8 4.1 5.6 6.0 6.8 7.6 7.8 5.8 5.2 3.7 3.2 61.5 Port Hueneme 2.0 2.3 3.3 4.6 4.9 4.9 4.9 5.0 3.7 3.2 2.5 2.2 43.5 Thousand Oaks 2.2 2.6 3.4 4.5 5.4 5.9 6.7 6.4 5.4 3.9 2.6 2.0 51.0 Ventura 2.2 2.6 3.2 3.8 4.6 4.7 5.5 4.9 4.1 3.4 2.5 2.0 43.5 YOLO
Bryte 0.9 1.7 3.3 5.0 6.4 7.5 7.9 7.0 5.2 3.5 1.6 1.0 51.0 Davis 1.0 1.9 3.3 5.0 6.4 7.6 8.2 7.1 5.4 4.0 1.8 1.0 52.5 Esparto 1.0 1.7 3.4 5.5 6.9 8.1 8.5 7.5 5.8 4.2 2.0 1.2 55.8 Winters 1.7 1.7 2.9 4.4 5.8 7.1 7.9 6.7 5.3 3.3 1.6 1.0 49.4 Woodland 1.0 1.8 3.2 4.7 6.1 7.7 8.2 7.2 5.4 3.7 1.7 1.0 51.6 Zamora 1.1 1.9 3.5 5.2 6.4 7.4 7.8 7.0 5.5 4.0 1.9 1.2 52.8 YUBA
Browns Valley 1.0 1.7 3.1 4.7 6.1 7.5 8.5 7.6 5.7 4.1 2.0 1.1 52.9 Brownsville 1.1 1.4 2.6 4.0 5.7 6.8 7.9 6.8 5.3 3.4 1.5 0.9 47.4 * The values in this table were derived from:
1) California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS); 2) Reference EvapoTranspiration Zones Map, UC Dept. of Land, Air & Water Resources and California Dept of Water Resources 1999; and
3) Reference Evapotranspiration for California, University of California, Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources (1987) Bulletin 1922,
4) Determining Daily Reference Evapotranspiration, Cooperative Extension UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources (1987), Publication Leaflet 21426
32 Appendix B – Sample Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet.

WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET
This worksheet is filled out by the project applicant and it is a required element of the Landscape Documentation Package.

Please complete all sections (A and B) of the worksheet.

SECTION A. HYDROZONE INFORMATION TABLE
Please complete the hydrozone table(s) for each hydrozone. Use as many tables as necessary to provide the square footage of landscape area per hydrozone.

Hydrozone* Zone or
Valve
Irrigation
Method**
Area
(Sq. Ft.)
% of
Landscape Area
Total 100%
* Hydrozone
HW = High Water Use Plants
MW = Moderate Water Use Plants
LW = Low Water Use Plants
**Irrigation Method
MS = Micro-spray
S = Spray
R = Rotor
B= Bubbler
D= Drip
O = Other
33 SECTION B. WATER BUDGET CALCULATIONS
Section B1. Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA)
The project's Maximum Applied Water Allowance shall be calculated using theseis equations:

MAWA = (ETo) (0.62) [(0.57 x LA) + (0.3 x SLA)]
where:

MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance (gallons per year) ETo = Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix A (inches per year)

0.7 = ET Adjustment Factor (ETAF)
LA = Landscaped Area includes Special Landscape Area (square feet)

0.62 = Conversion factor (to gallons per square foot)
SLA = Portion of the landscape area identified as Special Landscape Area (square feet)

0.3 = the additional ET Adjustment Factors for Special Landscape Area in residential and non-residential areas, respectively (1.0 - 0.7 = 0.3)
Maximum Applied Water Allowance = ________________________gallons per year Show calculations.

Effective Precipitation (Eppt)
If considering Effective Precipitation, use 25% of annual precipitation. Use the following equation to calculate Maximum Applied Water Allowance:

MAWA= (ETo – Eppt) (0.62) [(0.70.5 x LA) + (0.3 x SLA)] Maximum Applied Water Allowance = ________________________gallons per year Show calculations.

Section B2. Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU)
34 The project’s Estimated Total Water Use is calculated using the following formula:
where:

ETWU = Estimated total water use per year (gallons per year) ETo = Reference Evapotranspiration (inches per year)
PF = Plant Factor (see Definitions)
HA = Hydrozone Area [high, medium, and low water use areas] (square feet) SLA = Special Landscape Area (square feet)

0.62 = Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot)
IE = Irrigation Efficiency (minimum 0.71
Hydrozone Table for Calculating ETWU
Please complete the hydrozone table(s). Use as many tables as necessary.

Estimated Total Water Use = _________________________gallons Show calculations.

Hydrozone
Plant Water
Use Type(s)
Plant
Factor (PF)
Area (HA)
(square feet)
PF x HA
(square feet)
Sum
SLA

= + SLA
IE
PF x HA
ETWU (ETo)(0.62)
35 Appendix B – Sample Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet.

WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET
This worksheet is filled out by the project applicant and it is a required element of the Landscape Documentation Package.

Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) ____________
ETAF Calculations
Regular Landscape Areas
All Landscape Areas
Hydrozone #
/Planting
Description
a
Plant
Factor (PF)
Irrigation
Methodb
Irrigation
Efficiency
(IE)
c
ETAF
(PF/IE)
Landscape
Area (sq, ft,)
ETAF x Area Estimated Total
Water Use
(ETWU)
e
Regular Landscape Areas
Totals (A) (B)
Special Landscape Areas
1 1
1 Totals (C) (D)
ETWU Total
Maximum Allowed Water Allowance (MAWA)
e
Total ETAF x Area (B)
Total Area (A)
Average ETAF B ÷ A
Total ETAF x Area (B+D)
Total Area (A+C)
Sitewide ETAF (B+D) ÷ (A+C)
a
Hydrozone #/Planting Description
E.g

1.) front lawn

2.) low water use plantings

3.) medium water use planting
b
Irrigation Method cIrrigation Efficiency
overhead spray 0.75 for spray head
or drip 0.81 for drip
d
ETWU (Annual Gallons Required) =
Eto x 0.62 x ETAF x Area
where 0.62 is a conversion
factor that acre-inches per
acre per year to gallons per
square foot per year.

Average ETAF for Regular Landscape Areas must
be 0.55 or below for residential areas, and 0.45 or
below for non-residential areas.
eMAWA (Annual Gallons Allowed) = (Eto) ( 0.62) [ (ETAF x LA) + ((1-ETAF) x SLA)]
where 0.62 is a conversion factor that acre-inches per
acre per year to gallons per square foot per year, LA is the total landscape area in square feet, SLA is the total special landscape area in square feet,
and ETAF is .55 for residential areas and 0.45 for nonresidential areas. 36 Appendix C – Sample Certificate of Completion.

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
This certificate is filled out by the project applicant upon completion of the landscape project.

PART 1. PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET
Date
Project Name
Name of Project Applicant Telephone No.

Fax No.

Title Email Address
Company Street Address
City State Zip Code
Project Address and Location:

Street Address Parcel, tract or lot number, if available.

City Latitude/Longitude (optional)
State Zip Code
Property Owner or his/her designee:

Name Telephone No.

Fax No.

Title Email Address
Company Street Address
City State Zip Code
Property Owner
“I/we certify that I/we have received copies of all the documents within the Landscape Documentation Package and the Certificate of Completion and that it is our responsibility to see that the project is maintained in accordance with the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule.” ______________________________________________________________________________ Property Owner Signature Date
Please answer the questions below:

1. Date the Landscape Documentation Package was submitted to the local agency_____________

2. Date the Landscape Documentation Package was approved by the local agency_____________

3. Date that a copy of the Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet (including the Water Budget Calculation) was submitted to the local water purveyor_____________
37 PART 2. CERTIFICATION OF INSTALLATION ACCORDING TO THE LANDSCAPE

DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE
“I/we certify that based upon periodic site observations, the work has been substantially completed in accordance with the ordinance and that the landscape planting and irrigation installation conform with the criteria and specifications of the approved Landscape Documentation Package.” Signature* Date
Name (print) Telephone No.

Fax No.

Title Email Address
License No. or Certification No.

Company Street Address
City State Zip Code
*Signer of the landscape design plan, signer of the irrigation plan, or a licensed landscape contractor.

PART 3. IRRIGATION SCHEDULING
Attach parameters for setting the irrigation schedule on controller per ordinance Section 492.10.

PART 4. SCHEDULE OF LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE Attach schedule of Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance per ordinance Section 492.11.

PART 5. LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AUDIT REPORT
Attach Landscape Irrigation Audit Report per ordinance Section 492.12.

PART 6. SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT
Attach soil analysis report, if not previously submitted with the Landscape Documentation Package per ordinance Section 492.65.

Attach documentation verifying implementation of recommendations from soil analysis report per ordinance Section 492.65.
38 Appendix D – Sample Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet.

Appendix D – Prescriptive Compliance Option
(a) This appendix contains prescriptive requirements which may be used as a compliance option to the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.
(b)Compliance with the following items is mandatory and must be documented on a landscape plan in order to use the prescriptive compliance option:
(1) Submit a Landscape Documentation Package which includes the following elements:
(A) date
(B) project applicant
(C) project address (if available, parcel and/or lot number(s)) (D) total landscape area (square feet), including a breakdown of turf and plant material (E) project type (e.g., new, rehabilitated, public, private, cemetery, homeowner-installed) (F) water supply type (e.g., potable, recycled, well) and identify the local retail water purveyor if the applicant is not served by a private well
(G) contact information for the project applicant and property owner (H) applicant signature and date with statement, “I agree to comply with the requirements of the prescriptive compliance option to the MWELO”.
(2) Incorporate compost at a rate of at least four cubic yards per 1,000 square feet to a depth of six inches into landscape area (unless contra-indicated by a soil test); (3) Plant material shall comply with all of the following; (A) For residential areas, install climate adapted plants that require occasional, little or no summer water (average WUCOLS plant factor 0.3) for 75% of the plant area excluding edibles and areas using recycled water; For non-residential areas, install climate adapted plants that require occasional, little or no summer water (average WUCOLS plant factor 0.3) for 100% of the plant area excluding edibles and areas using recycled water; (B) A minimum three inch (3Ǝ) layer of mulch shall be applied on all exposed soil surfaces of planting areas except in turf areas, creeping or rooting groundcovers, or direct seeding applications where mulch is contraindicated.
(4) Turf shall comply with all of the following:
(A) Turf shall not exceed 25% of the landscape area in residential areas, and there shall be no turf in non-residential areas;
(B) Turf shall not be planted on sloped areas which exceed a slope of 1 foot vertical elevation change for every 4 feet of horizontal length;
(C) Turf is prohibited in parkways less than 10 feet wide, unless the parkway is adjacent to a parking strip and used to enter and exit vehicles. Any turf in parkways must be irrigated by subsurface irrigation or by other technology that creates no overspray or runoff. (5) Irrigation systems shall comply with the following:
(A) Automatic irrigation controllers are required and must use evapotranspiration or soil moisture sensor data.
(B) Irrigation controllers shall be of a type which does not lose programming date in the event the primary power source is interrupted.
(C) Pressure regulators shall be installed on the irrigation system to ensure the dynamic pressure of the system is within the manufacturers recommended pressure range. (D) Manual shut-off valves (such as a gate valve, ball valve, or butterfly valve) shall be installed as close as possible to the point of connection of the water supply. (E) All irrigation emission devices must meet the requirements set in the ANSI standard, ASABE/ICC 802-2014. “Landscape Irrigation Sprinkler and Emitter Standard,” All sprinkler heads installed in the landscape must document a distribution uniformity low quarter of 0.65 or higher using the protocol defined in ASABE/ICC 802-2014. 39 (c) At the time of final inspection, the permit applicant must provide the owner of the property with a certificate of completion, certificate of installation, irrigation schedule and a schedule of landscape and irrigation maintenance.
40 Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA)
The project's Maximum Applied Water Allowance shall be calculated using this equation:

47.78 0.45

0.55 411,400 ft2
0 ft2
Eto ETAF LA or SLA (ft2
) Conversion
MAWA for LA = 47.78 x 0.45 x 411,400 x 0.62
MAWA for SLA = 47.78 x 0.55 x 0x 0.62
411,400
5,484,217 Gal/yr AF/yr
AB 1881 WATER BUDGET CALCULATIONS CIMIS Station # 152
LA (Total Landscaped Area including SLA) =
SLA (Special Landscaped Area) =
Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) =
MAWA (Gallons Per Year)
5,484,217
0 5,484,217
MAWA = (ETo) x (0.62) x [(0.45 x LA) + (0.55 x SLA)]

0.62 (Conversion Factor)
Eto (Historical Evapotranspiration for Area) =
ETAF(Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor - LA) =
ETAF(Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor - SLA) =
Totals =

16.830

47.78 Eto Conversion PF
HA (ft2)
SLA
(ft2)
IE Gallons

47.78 x 0.62 x 0.40 x 211,400 ÷ 0.90 2,783,302

47.78 x 0.62 x 0.30 x 200,000 ÷ 0.90 1,974,907
411,400 4,758,208
Gal / yr AF / yr

13.2%
Totals =
Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU) = 4,758,208 14.602
Percentage of savings over new MAWA =
HA = Hydrozone Area [high, medium and low water use areas] (square feet) Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU)
The project's Estimated Total Water Use shall be calculated using this equation:

ETWU = (Eto) (0.62) [(PF x HA) / IE + SLA]
ETWU = Estimated Total Water Use per year (gallons)
Eto = Referance Evapotranspiration (inches) (inches per year) PF = Plant Factor from WUCOLS (see section 491)
SLA = Special Landscape Area (square feet)

0.62 = Conversion Factor
IE = Irrigation Efficiency
Hydrozone Area # 1 (Shrub In-Line Drip)
Hydrozone Area # 2 (Shrub In-Line Drip)
AMARA
ATTACHMENT 3
February 21, 2017
AMARA
Regional Shopping Center
Camarillo, California
Landscape Irrigation Water Use Statement
The landscape irrigation will require 7.88 acre feet of water. The maximum water allowance for landscape irrigation is per year based upon the proposed modifications of the landscape ordinance.

The following water conservation methods will be employed:
· Drought tolerant, native or adaptive species with low water requirements will be specified. · Plants will be grouped according to hydro-zones based upon water required to sustain them. · No high water use plants or turf are to be specified. · Decomposed granite or shredded bark mulch will be utilized in the planting areas to a minimum 2-1/2” depth. This reduces water demand.
· The landscape area shall be separately metered.
· Automatic irrigation controllers shall utilize evapotranspiration data for scheduling of all irrigation systems.
· Rain sensors that suspend or alter irrigation operations during rain shall be specified. · Irrigation to be designed to prevent run-off and low head drainage where water flows on to non-targeted areas such as adjacent property, non-irrigated areas, hardscapes, roadways or structures. · Master control valve and flow sensors will be specified. This will shut the irrigation system off in the event of a main line break.
· Each irrigation valve will be zoned to irrigate a hydro-zone with similar site, sun exposure, soil conditions and plant materials with similar water use.
· Trees will be placed on separate valves from shrubs and groundcovers. · Recommendations for annual irrigation schedule shall be specified. · In line drip tubing will be the primary method of applying water to the landscape areas.

The following table describe the water use break down by Water Meter.

Water Meter by Location Estimated Water Use (AF/yr) Estimated Maximum Demand (GPM)
Estimated Savings Over
Maximum Allowable
Building #2 .30 AF/yr (7,891 SF) 14 GPM 4%
Buildings #3-13 & 16-21 7.1 AF/yr (187,943 SF) 75 GPM 4% Building #14 .18 AF/yr (5,544 SF) 14 GPM 17.7%
Building #15 .30 AF/yr (8,073 SF) 13 GPM 5.6%
Sincerely,
Jim Ridge, ASLA, LEED AP
Principal
Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA)
The project's Maximum Applied Water Allowance shall be calculated using this equation:

46.10 0.45

0.55 7,891 ft2
0 ft2
Eto ETAF LA or SLA (ft2
) Conversion
MAWA for LA = 46.10 x 0.45 x 7,891 x 0.62
MAWA for SLA = 46.10 x 0.55 x 0 x 0.62
7,891
101,498 Gal/yr AF/yr

46.10 Eto Conversion PF
HA (ft2)
SLA (ft2)
IE Gallons

46.10 x 0.62 x 0.40 x 3,946 ÷ 0.81 55,692

46.10 x 0.62 x 0.30 x 3,946 ÷ 0.81 41,769
7,891 97,461
Gal / yr AF / yr

4.0%
Totals =

0.311
MAWA (Gallons Per Year)
101,498
0 101,498
MAWA = (ETo) x (0.62) x [(0.45 x LA) + (0.55 x SLA)]

0.62 (Conversion Factor)
Eto (Historical Evapotranspiration for Area) =
ETAF(Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor - LA) =
ETAF(Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor - SLA) =
AB 1881 WATER BUDGET CALCULATIONS CIMIS Station # 152
LA (Total Landscaped Area including SLA) =
SLA (Special Landscaped Area) =
Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) =

0.62 = Conversion Factor
IE = Irrigation Efficiency
Hydrozone Area # 1 Shrub In-Line Drip (MOD)
Hydrozone Area # 2 Shrub In-Line Drip (LOW)
ETWU = Estimated Total Water Use per year (gallons)
Eto = Referance Evapotranspiration (inches) (inches per year) PF = Plant Factor from WUCOLS (see section 491)
SLA = Special Landscape Area (square feet)
Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU)
The project's Estimated Total Water Use shall be calculated using this equation:

ETWU = (Eto) (0.62) [(PF x HA) / IE + SLA]
BUILDING #2
Percentage of savings over new MAWA =
HA = Hydrozone Area [high, medium and low water use areas] (square feet) Totals =
Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU) = 97,461 0.299
Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA)
The project's Maximum Applied Water Allowance shall be calculated using this equation:

46.10 0.45

0.55 187,943 ft2
0 ft2
Eto ETAF LA or SLA (ft2
) Conversion
MAWA for LA = 46.10 x 0.45 x 187,943 x 0.62
MAWA for SLA = 46.10 x 0.55 x 0 x 0.62
187,943
2,417,299 Gal/yr AF/yr

46.10 Eto Conversion PF
HA (ft2)
SLA (ft2)
IE Gallons

46.10 x 0.62 x 0.40 x 93,971 ÷ 0.81 1,326,364

46.10 x 0.62 x 0.30 x 93,971 ÷ 0.81 994,773
187,943 2,321,138
Gal / yr AF / yr

4.0%
Totals =
Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU) = 2,321,138 7.123
BUILDINGS: 3-13 & 16-21
Percentage of savings over new MAWA =
HA = Hydrozone Area [high, medium and low water use areas] (square feet) Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU)
The project's Estimated Total Water Use shall be calculated using this equation:

ETWU = (Eto) (0.62) [(PF x HA) / IE + SLA]
ETWU = Estimated Total Water Use per year (gallons)
Eto = Referance Evapotranspiration (inches) (inches per year) PF = Plant Factor from WUCOLS (see section 491)
SLA = Special Landscape Area (square feet)

0.62 = Conversion Factor
IE = Irrigation Efficiency
Hydrozone Area # 1 Shrub In-Line Drip (MOD)
Hydrozone Area # 2 Shrub In-Line Drip (LOW)
AB 1881 WATER BUDGET CALCULATIONS CIMIS Station # 152
LA (Total Landscaped Area including SLA) =
SLA (Special Landscaped Area) =
Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) =
MAWA (Gallons Per Year)
2,417,299
0 2,417,299
MAWA = (ETo) x (0.62) x [(0.45 x LA) + (0.55 x SLA)]

0.62 (Conversion Factor)
Eto (Historical Evapotranspiration for Area) =
ETAF(Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor - LA) =
ETAF(Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor - SLA) =
Totals =

7.418
Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA)
The project's Maximum Applied Water Allowance shall be calculated using this equation:

46.10 0.45

0.55 5,544 ft2
0 ft2
Eto ETAF LA or SLA (ft2
) Conversion
MAWA for LA = 46.10 x 0.45 x 5,544 x 0.62
MAWA for SLA = 46.10 x 0.55 x 0 x 0.62
5,544
71,306 Gal/yr AF/yr

46.10 Eto Conversion PF
HA (ft2)
SLA
(ft2)
IE Gallons

46.10 x 0.62 x 0.40 x 0 ÷ 0.81 0

46.10 x 0.62 x 0.30 x 5,544 ÷ 0.81 58,688
5,544 58,688
Gal / yr AF / yr

17.7%
Totals =

0.219
MAWA (Gallons Per Year)
71,306
0 71,306
MAWA = (ETo) x (0.62) x [(0.45 x LA) + (0.55 x SLA)]

0.62 (Conversion Factor)
Eto (Historical Evapotranspiration for Area) =
ETAF(Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor - LA) =
ETAF(Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor - SLA) =
AB 1881 WATER BUDGET CALCULATIONS CIMIS Station # 152
LA (Total Landscaped Area including SLA) =
SLA (Special Landscaped Area) =
Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) =

0.62 = Conversion Factor
IE = Irrigation Efficiency
Hydrozone Area # 1 (Shrub In-Line Drip)
Hydrozone Area # 2 (Shrub In-Line Drip)
ETWU = Estimated Total Water Use per year (gallons)
Eto = Referance Evapotranspiration (inches) (inches per year) PF = Plant Factor from WUCOLS (see section 491)
SLA = Special Landscape Area (square feet)
Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU)
The project's Estimated Total Water Use shall be calculated using this equation:

ETWU = (Eto) (0.62) [(PF x HA) / IE + SLA]
BUILDING #14
Percentage of savings over new MAWA =
HA = Hydrozone Area [high, medium and low water use areas] (square feet) Totals =
Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU) = 58,688 0.180
Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA)
The project's Maximum Applied Water Allowance shall be calculated using this equation:

46.10 0.45

0.55 8,073 ft2
0 ft2
Eto ETAF LA or SLA (ft2
) Conversion
MAWA for LA = 46.10 x 0.45 x 8,073 x 0.62
MAWA for SLA = 46.10 x 0.55 x 0 x 0.62
8,073
103,835 Gal/yr AF/yr

46.10 Eto Conversion PF
HA (ft2)
SLA
(ft2)
IE Gallons

46.10 x 0.62 x 0.40 x 3,552 ÷ 0.81 50,129

46.10 x 0.62 x 0.30 x 4,521 ÷ 0.81 47,863
8,073 97,993
Gal / yr AF / yr

5.6%
Totals =
Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU) = 97,993 0.301
BUILDING #15
Percentage of savings over new MAWA =
HA = Hydrozone Area [high, medium and low water use areas] (square feet) Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU)
The project's Estimated Total Water Use shall be calculated using this equation:

ETWU = (Eto) (0.62) [(PF x HA) / IE + SLA]
ETWU = Estimated Total Water Use per year (gallons)
Eto = Referance Evapotranspiration (inches) (inches per year) PF = Plant Factor from WUCOLS (see section 491)
SLA = Special Landscape Area (square feet)

0.62 = Conversion Factor
IE = Irrigation Efficiency
Hydrozone Area # 1 (Shrub In-Line Drip)
Hydrozone Area # 2 (Shrub In-Line Drip)
AB 1881 WATER BUDGET CALCULATIONS CIMIS Station # 152
LA (Total Landscaped Area including SLA) =
SLA (Special Landscaped Area) =
Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) =
MAWA (Gallons Per Year)
103,835
0 103,835
MAWA = (ETo) x (0.62) x [(0.45 x LA) + (0.55 x SLA)]

0.62 (Conversion Factor)
Eto (Historical Evapotranspiration for Area) =
ETAF(Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor - LA) =
ETAF(Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor - SLA) =
Totals =

0.319
Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx Appendix F
WaterCad Analysis Output
Label Elevation
(ft)
Demand
(gpm)
Hydraulic
Grade (ft)
Pressure
(psi)
J-1 77.07 0 203.31 54.6
J-2 77.71 0 200.85 53.3
J-3 77.3 0 199.82 53
J-4 79.68 1.09 199.82 52
J-5 79.9 1.09 193.87 49.3
J-6 77.62 0 198.94 52.5
J-7 77.4 0 197.18 51.8
J-8 79.71 0 195.17 50
J-9 80.56 0 194.39 49.2
J-10 81.46 0 194.31 48.8
J-11 82.03 0 193.92 48.4
J-12 81.91 0 193.87 48.4
J-13 82.1 0 193.67 48.3
J-14 82.72 0 193.25 47.8
J-15 82.72 0 192.96 47.7
J-16 83.87 0 192.64 47.1
J-17 84.21 0 192.6 46.9
J-18 86.06 0 192.55 46.1
J-19 87.38 0.06 191.73 45.1
J-20 87.95 0 191.71 44.9
J-21 86.65 0 191.61 45.4
J-22 83.47 0 191.44 46.7
J-23 81.35 0 191.14 47.5
J-24 81.2 0 191.12 47.6
J-25 80.81 0 191.1 47.7
J-26 80.46 0 191.27 47.9
J-27 80.06 0 191.66 48.3
J-28 79.33 0 192.13 48.8
J-29 78.27 0 192.37 49.4
J-30 78.71 0 193.46 49.6
J-31 78.42 0 193.83 49.9
J-32 77.52 0 195.03 50.8
J-33 77.47 0 195.42 51
J-34 77.1 0 195.96 51.4
J-35 77.14 0 197.01 51.9
J-36 76 0 199.34 53.4
J-37 75.5 0 200.08 53.9
J-38 78.05 0 198.94 52.3
J-39 77.96 0 197.18 51.6
J-40 78.43 0 197.18 51.4
J-41 79.81 0 195.17 49.9
Scenario 1 - Junction Report
Label Elevation
(ft)
Demand
(gpm)
Hydraulic
Grade (ft)
Pressure
(psi)
Scenario 1 - Junction Report
J-42 79.9 0 195.17 49.9
J-43 81.81 0 194.31 48.7
J-44 82.37 0 193.92 48.3
J-45 82.44 0 193.67 48.1
J-46 82.69 0 193.25 47.8
J-47 82.89 0 192.96 47.6
J-48 84.55 0 192.64 46.8
J-49 85.93 0 192.55 46.1
J-50 79.81 0 192.88 48.9
J-51 77.96 0 195.9 51
J-52 79.36 0 193.74 49.5
J-53 80.17 0 192.47 48.6
J-54 80.44 0 192.49 48.5
J-55 81.36 0 192.52 48.1
J-56 83.17 0 192.55 47.3
J-57 83.72 0 192.58 47.1
J-58 78.24 0 195.9 50.9
J-59 80.51 0 193.74 49
J-60 81.3 0 192.49 48.1
J-61 81.34 0 192.52 48.1
J-62 82.95 0 192.55 47.4
J-63 84.52 0 192.58 46.8
J-64 79.67 0 188.74 47.2
J-65 81.34 0 183.92 44.4
J-66 81.77 0 183.93 44.2
J-67 82.7 0 188.28 45.7
J-68 81.79 0 189.53 46.6
J-69 81.19 0 189.81 47
J-70 80 0 190.25 47.7
J-71 79.95 0 190.25 47.7
J-72 80.05 0 190.25 47.7
J-73 81.14 0 189.81 47
J-74 82.55 0 188.28 45.7
J-75 81.99 2,000.00 159.89 33.7
J-76 81.61 2,000.00 159.83 33.8
J-77 79.9 0 188.74 47.1
J-78 78.08 3.59 200.85 53.1
J-79 77.78 0 201.79 53.7
J-80 77.83 0.08 197.18 51.6
J-81 81.47 1.24 194.18 48.8
J-83 82.72 2.37 193.56 48
Label Elevation
(ft)
Demand
(gpm)
Hydraulic
Grade (ft)
Pressure
(psi)
Scenario 1 - Junction Report
J-84 82.9 0.15 193.04 47.7
J-85 82.7 150 192.86 47.7
J-86 83.54 0.15 192.75 47.3
J-87 85.02 0.1 192.58 46.5
J-88 79.87 0 191.3 48.2
J-89 80.29 0 189.6 47.3
J-90 80.39 0 186.79 46
J-91 81.26 0 189.78 47
J-92 81.02 2.11 190.06 47.2
J-93 80.75 0.15 190.14 47.3
J-94 77.4 0.08 200.16 53.1
J-95 81.46 0.5 194.06 48.7
J-96 82.74 0.33 192.84 47.6
J-97 84.83 28 192.59 46.6
J-98 87.41 26 191.73 45.1
J-99 78.89 1.16 194.47 50
Label Length
(Scaled) (ft) Start Node Stop Node Diameter (in) Material HazenWilliams C Minor Loss
Coefficient
(Derived)
Flow (gpm) Velocity
(ft/s)
Headloss
Gradient
(ft/ft)
P-1 98 J-3 J-4 12 PVC 130 0.35 1.09 0 0
P-2 18 J-3 J-6 12 PVC 130 1.38 2,024.76 5.74 0.048
P-3 169 J-6 J-7 12 PVC 130 0.35 2,024.76 5.74 0.01
P-4 196 J-7 J-8 12 PVC 130 0.35 2,024.68 5.74 0.01
P-5 56 J-9 J-10 12 PVC 130 0.35 663.1 1.88 0.002
P-6 25 J-11 J-12 12 PVC 130 0.35 661.36 1.88 0.002
P-7 39 J-16 J-17 12 PVC 130 0.35 507.27 1.44 0.001
P-8 164 J-20 J-21 10 PVC 120 0.35 260.95 1.07 0.001
P-9 277 J-21 J-22 10 PVC 120 0.35 260.95 1.07 0.001
P-10 487 J-22 J-23 10 PVC 120 0.35 260.95 1.07 0.001
P-11 62 J-23 J-24 12 PVC 130 0.35 260.95 0.74 0
P-12 109 J-24 J-25 12 PVC 130 0.35 260.95 0.74 0
P-13 48 J-25 J-26 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,021.59 2.9 0.004
P-14 130 J-26 J-27 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,021.59 2.9 0.003
P-15 159 J-27 J-28 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,021.59 2.9 0.003
P-16 12 J-28 J-29 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,834.63 5.2 0.02
P-17 121 J-29 J-30 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,834.63 5.2 0.009
P-18 28 J-30 J-31 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,834.63 5.2 0.013
P-19 135 J-31 J-32 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,834.63 5.2 0.009
P-20 30 J-32 J-33 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,834.63 5.2 0.013
P-21 50 J-33 J-34 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,834.63 5.2 0.011
P-22 78 J-34 J-35 12 PVC 130 0.35 -2,188.74 6.21 0.013
P-23 196 J-35 J-36 12 PVC 130 0.35 -2,188.74 6.21 0.012 P-24 50 J-36 J-37 12 PVC 130 0.35 -2,188.74 6.21 0.015
P-25 279 J-37 J-1 12 PVC 130 0.35 -2,188.74 6.21 0.012
P-26 15 J-5 J-12 12 PVC 130 1.28 -1.09 0 0
P-27 21 J-6 J-38 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-28 11 J-39 J-40 6 PVC 120 1.24 0 0 0
P-29 91 J-8 J-41 8 PVC 120 0.35 0 0 0
P-30 19 J-41 J-42 6 PVC 120 1.24 0 0 0
P-31 13 J-10 J-43 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-32 13 J-11 J-44 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-33 13 J-13 J-45 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-34 13 J-14 J-46 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-35 13 J-15 J-47 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-36 23 J-16 J-48 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-37 27 J-18 J-49 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-38 259 J-9 J-50 12 PVC 130 1.48 1,361.57 3.86 0.006
P-39 108 J-34 J-51 12 PVC 130 1.28 354.11 1 0.001
P-40 68 J-52 J-50 6 PVC 120 0 352.95 4 0.013
P-41 41 J-50 J-53 12 PVC 130 0.35 1,714.52 4.86 0.01
P-42 114 J-53 J-54 12 PVC 130 0.75 -192.16 0.55 0
P-43 230 J-54 J-55 12 PVC 130 0.35 -192.16 0.55 0
P-44 273 J-55 J-56 12 PVC 130 0.35 -192.16 0.55 0
P-45 195 J-56 J-57 12 PVC 130 0.7 -192.16 0.55 0
P-46 174 J-57 J-17 12 PVC 130 0.45 -192.16 0.55 0
P-47 14 J-51 J-58 6 PVC 120 0 0 0 0
P-48 43 J-52 J-59 6 PVC 120 0 0 0 0
P-49 8 J-54 J-60 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-50 17 J-55 J-61 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-51 21 J-56 J-62 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-52 22 J-57 J-63 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-53 232 J-65 J-66 12 PVC 130 0.35 -93.32 0.26 0
P-54 395 J-66 J-67 12 PVC 130 0.75 -2,093.32 5.94 0.011 P-55 85 J-67 J-68 12 PVC 130 0.75 -2,093.32 5.94 0.015
P-56 70 J-70 J-71 8 PVC 120 0.4 0 0 0
Scenario 1 - Pipe Report
Label Length
(Scaled) (ft) Start Node Stop Node Diameter (in) Material HazenWilliams C Minor Loss
Coefficient
(Derived)
Flow (gpm) Velocity
(ft/s)
Headloss
Gradient
(ft/ft)
Scenario 1 - Pipe Report
P-57 18 J-71 J-72 6 PVC 120 1.24 0 0 0
P-58 90 J-25 J-68 10 PVC 120 1.28 1,282.54 5.24 0.017
P-59 18 J-69 J-73 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-60 93 J-70 J-28 8 PVC 120 1.28 -813.03 5.19 0.02
P-61 18 J-67 J-74 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-62 14 J-66 J-75 6 PVC 120 2.47 2,000.00 22.69 1.74
P-63 14 J-65 J-76 6 PVC 120 2.47 2,000.00 22.69 1.724
P-64 14 J-64 J-77 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-65 28 R-1 PMP-1 60 Ductile Iron 130 0 4,218.25 0.48 0 P-66 25 PMP-1 J-1 60 Ductile Iron 130 0 4,218.25 0.48 0 P-67 50 J-2 J-78 8 PVC 120 2.08 3.59 0.02 0
P-68 156 J-1 J-79 12 PVC 130 0.1 2,029.52 5.76 0.01
P-69 30 J-79 J-2 12 PVC 130 1.28 2,029.52 5.76 0.031
P-70 40 J-7 J-80 8 PVC 120 1.28 0.08 0 0
P-71 11 J-80 J-39 8 PVC 120 0 0 0 0
P-72 89 J-10 J-81 12 PVC 130 0.35 663.1 1.88 0.001
P-74 71 J-13 J-83 12 PVC 130 0.35 660.27 1.87 0.001
P-75 236 J-83 J-14 12 PVC 130 0.75 657.9 1.87 0.001
P-76 76 J-15 J-85 12 PVC 130 0.35 657.75 1.87 0.001
P-77 137 J-86 J-16 12 PVC 130 0.35 507.27 1.44 0.001
P-78 112 J-87 J-18 12 PVC 130 0.35 287.01 0.81 0
P-79 70 J-53 J-88 12 PVC 130 1.28 1,906.68 5.41 0.017
P-80 134 J-88 J-89 12 PVC 130 1.28 1,906.68 5.41 0.013
P-81 33 J-89 J-64 12 PVC 130 1.28 1,906.68 5.41 0.026
P-82 99 J-64 J-90 12 PVC 130 2.47 1,906.68 5.41 0.02
P-83 209 J-90 J-65 12 PVC 130 2.47 1,906.68 5.41 0.014
P-84 127 J-68 J-91 12 PVC 130 0.35 -810.77 2.3 0.002
P-85 5 J-91 J-69 12 PVC 130 0.35 -810.77 2.3 0.007
P-86 126 J-69 J-92 12 PVC 130 0.35 -810.77 2.3 0.002
P-87 28 J-92 J-93 12 PVC 130 0.35 -812.88 2.31 0.003
P-88 51 J-93 J-70 12 PVC 130 0.35 -813.03 2.31 0.002
P-89 112 J-18 J-19 6 Ductile Iron 130 0 287.01 3.26 0.007 P-90 54 J-2 J-94 12 PVC 130 0.35 2,025.93 5.75 0.013
P-91 17 J-94 J-3 12 PVC 130 0.35 2,025.85 5.75 0.02
P-92 76 J-8 J-9 12 PVC 150 0.45 2,024.68 5.74 0.01
P-93 85 J-81 J-95 12 PVC 130 0.35 661.86 1.88 0.001
P-95 208 J-12 J-13 12 PVC 150 0.35 660.27 1.87 0.001
P-96 60 J-84 J-15 12 PVC 150 0.35 657.75 1.87 0.001
P-97 210 J-14 J-84 12 PVC 150 0.4 657.9 1.87 0.001
P-98 5 J-85 J-96 12 PVC 130 0.35 507.75 1.44 0.003
P-99 110 J-96 J-86 12 PVC 130 0.35 507.42 1.44 0.001
P-100 33 J-17 J-97 12 PVC 130 0.35 315.11 0.89 0
P-101 10 J-97 J-87 12 PVC 130 0.35 287.11 0.81 0.001
P-102 5 J-19 J-98 12 PVC 130 0 286.95 0.81 0
P-103 82 J-98 J-20 12 PVC 130 0 260.95 0.74 0
P-104 114 J-51 J-99 6 PVC 120 0 354.11 4.02 0.013
P-105 58 J-99 J-52 6 PVC 120 0 352.95 4 0.013
P-165 135 J-95 J-11 12 PVC 150 0.35 661.36 1.88 0.001
Label Elevation
(ft)
Pump
Definition
Status
(Initial)
Hydraulic
Grade
(Suction)
(ft)
Hydraulic
Grade
(Discharge)
(ft)
Flow
(Total)
(gpm)
Pump
Head (ft)
PMP-1 77.07 PMP-1 On 77.07 203.31 4,218.25 126.24
Scenario 1 - Pump Report
Label Elevation (ft) Flow (Out net)
(gpm)
Hydraulic Grade
(ft)
R-1 77.07 4,218.25 77.07
Scenario 1 - Reservoir Report
Label Elevation
(ft)
Demand
(gpm)
Hydraulic
Grade (ft)
Pressure
(psi)
J-1 77.07 0 203.31 54.6
J-2 77.71 0 200.18 53
J-3 77.3 0 198.86 52.6
J-4 79.68 1.09 198.86 51.6
J-5 79.9 1.09 187.43 46.5
J-6 77.62 0 197.73 52
J-7 77.4 0 195.5 51.1
J-8 79.71 0 192.94 49
J-9 80.56 0 191.95 48.2
J-10 81.46 0 191.2 47.5
J-11 82.03 0 187.86 45.8
J-12 81.91 0 187.43 45.7
J-13 82.1 0 185.65 44.8
J-14 82.72 0 182 43
J-15 82.72 0 181.99 43
J-16 83.87 0 185.79 44.1
J-17 84.21 0 186.36 44.2
J-18 86.06 0 186.6 43.5
J-19 87.38 0.06 190.5 44.6
J-20 87.95 0 190.61 44.4
J-21 86.65 0 191.25 45.3
J-22 83.47 0 192.29 47.1
J-23 81.35 0 194.09 48.8
J-24 81.2 0 194.19 48.9
J-25 80.81 0 194.35 49.1
J-26 80.46 0 194.5 49.3
J-27 80.06 0 194.84 49.7
J-28 79.33 0 195.24 50.1
J-29 78.27 0 195.38 50.7
J-30 78.71 0 196.06 50.8
J-31 78.42 0 196.29 51
J-32 77.52 0 197.03 51.7
J-33 77.47 0 197.26 51.8
J-34 77.1 0 197.59 52.1
J-35 77.14 0 198.41 52.5
J-36 76 0 200.22 53.7
J-37 75.5 0 200.8 54.2
J-38 78.05 0 197.73 51.8
J-39 77.96 0 195.5 50.9
J-40 78.43 0 195.5 50.6
J-41 79.81 0 192.94 48.9
Scenario 2 - Junction Report
Label Elevation
(ft)
Demand
(gpm)
Hydraulic
Grade (ft)
Pressure
(psi)
Scenario 2 - Junction Report
J-42 79.9 0 192.94 48.9
J-43 81.81 0 191.2 47.3
J-44 82.37 0 187.86 45.6
J-45 82.44 0 185.65 44.7
J-46 82.69 2,000.00 158.31 32.7
J-47 82.89 2,000.00 158.22 32.6
J-48 84.55 0 185.79 43.8
J-49 85.93 0 186.6 43.6
J-50 79.81 0 191.91 48.5
J-51 77.96 0 197.48 51.7
J-52 79.36 0 193.49 49.4
J-53 80.17 0 191.83 48.3
J-54 80.44 0 191.09 47.9
J-55 81.36 0 189.87 46.9
J-56 83.17 0 188.45 45.6
J-57 83.72 0 187.33 44.8
J-58 78.24 0 197.48 51.6
J-59 80.51 0 193.49 48.9
J-60 81.3 0 191.09 47.5
J-61 81.34 0 189.87 47
J-62 82.95 0 188.45 45.6
J-63 84.52 0 187.33 44.5
J-64 79.67 0 192.42 48.8
J-65 81.34 0 193.17 48.4
J-66 81.77 0 193.52 48.3
J-67 82.7 0 194.12 48.2
J-68 81.79 0 194.29 48.7
J-69 81.19 0 194.39 49
J-70 80 0 194.55 49.6
J-71 79.95 0 194.55 49.6
J-72 80.05 0 194.55 49.5
J-73 81.14 0 194.39 49
J-74 82.55 0 194.12 48.3
J-75 81.99 0 193.52 48.3
J-76 81.61 0 193.17 48.3
J-77 79.9 0 192.42 48.7
J-78 78.08 3.59 200.18 52.8
J-79 77.78 0 201.39 53.5
J-80 77.83 0.08 195.5 50.9
J-81 81.47 1.24 190.12 47
J-83 82.72 2.37 184.75 44.1
Label Elevation
(ft)
Demand
(gpm)
Hydraulic
Grade (ft)
Pressure
(psi)
Scenario 2 - Junction Report
J-84 82.9 0.15 182 42.9
J-85 82.7 150 182.8 43.3
J-86 83.54 0.15 184.28 43.6
J-87 85.02 0.1 186.45 43.9
J-88 79.87 0 192.02 48.5
J-89 80.29 0 192.29 48.5
J-90 80.39 0 192.72 48.6
J-91 81.26 0 194.38 48.9
J-92 81.02 2.11 194.48 49.1
J-93 80.75 0.15 194.51 49.2
J-94 77.4 0.08 199.3 52.7
J-95 81.46 0.5 189.09 46.6
J-96 82.74 0.33 183.03 43.4
J-97 84.83 28 186.42 43.9
J-98 87.41 26 190.5 44.6
J-99 78.89 1.16 194.84 50.2
Label Length
(Scaled) (ft) Start Node Stop Node Diameter (in) Material HazenWilliams C Minor Loss
Coefficient
(Derived)
Flow (gpm) Velocity
(ft/s)
Headloss
Gradient
(ft/ft)
P-1 98 J-3 J-4 12 PVC 130 0.35 1.09 0 0
P-2 18 J-3 J-6 12 PVC 130 1.38 2,301.11 6.53 0.062
P-3 169 J-6 J-7 12 PVC 130 0.35 2,301.11 6.53 0.013
P-4 196 J-7 J-8 12 PVC 130 0.35 2,301.03 6.53 0.013
P-5 56 J-9 J-10 12 PVC 130 0.35 2,093.76 5.94 0.013
P-6 25 J-11 J-12 12 PVC 130 0.35 2,092.02 5.93 0.018
P-7 39 J-16 J-17 12 PVC 130 0.35 -2,062.07 5.85 0.014
P-8 164 J-20 J-21 10 PVC 120 0.35 -691.96 2.83 0.004
P-9 277 J-21 J-22 10 PVC 120 0.35 -691.96 2.83 0.004
P-10 487 J-22 J-23 10 PVC 120 0.35 -691.96 2.83 0.004
P-11 62 J-23 J-24 12 PVC 130 0.35 -691.96 1.96 0.002
P-12 109 J-24 J-25 12 PVC 130 0.35 -691.96 1.96 0.001
P-13 48 J-25 J-26 12 PVC 130 0.35 -940.95 2.67 0.003
P-14 130 J-26 J-27 12 PVC 130 0.35 -940.95 2.67 0.003
P-15 159 J-27 J-28 12 PVC 130 0.35 -940.95 2.67 0.003
P-16 12 J-28 J-29 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,418.90 4.03 0.012
P-17 121 J-29 J-30 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,418.90 4.03 0.006 P-18 28 J-30 J-31 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,418.90 4.03 0.008
P-19 135 J-31 J-32 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,418.90 4.03 0.005 P-20 30 J-32 J-33 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,418.90 4.03 0.008
P-21 50 J-33 J-34 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,418.90 4.03 0.007
P-22 78 J-34 J-35 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,912.38 5.43 0.01
P-23 196 J-35 J-36 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,912.38 5.43 0.009 P-24 50 J-36 J-37 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,912.38 5.43 0.012
P-25 279 J-37 J-1 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,912.38 5.43 0.009
P-26 15 J-5 J-12 12 PVC 130 1.28 -1.09 0 0
P-27 21 J-6 J-38 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-28 11 J-39 J-40 6 PVC 120 1.24 0 0 0
P-29 91 J-8 J-41 8 PVC 120 0.35 0 0 0
P-30 19 J-41 J-42 6 PVC 120 1.24 0 0 0
P-31 13 J-10 J-43 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-32 13 J-11 J-44 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-33 13 J-13 J-45 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-34 13 J-14 J-46 6 PVC 120 2.47 2,000.00 22.69 1.868
P-35 13 J-15 J-47 6 PVC 120 2.47 2,000.00 22.69 1.836
P-36 23 J-16 J-48 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-37 27 J-18 J-49 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-38 259 J-9 J-50 12 PVC 130 1.48 207.28 0.59 0
P-39 108 J-34 J-51 12 PVC 130 1.28 493.48 1.4 0.001
P-40 68 J-52 J-50 6 PVC 120 0 492.32 5.59 0.023
P-41 41 J-50 J-53 12 PVC 130 0.35 699.6 1.98 0.002
P-42 114 J-53 J-54 12 PVC 130 0.75 1,424.28 4.04 0.007
P-43 230 J-54 J-55 12 PVC 130 0.35 1,424.28 4.04 0.005
P-44 273 J-55 J-56 12 PVC 130 0.35 1,424.28 4.04 0.005
P-45 195 J-56 J-57 12 PVC 130 0.7 1,424.28 4.04 0.006
P-46 174 J-57 J-17 12 PVC 130 0.45 1,424.28 4.04 0.006
P-47 14 J-51 J-58 6 PVC 120 0 0 0 0
P-48 43 J-52 J-59 6 PVC 120 0 0 0 0
P-49 8 J-54 J-60 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-50 17 J-55 J-61 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-51 21 J-56 J-62 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-52 22 J-57 J-63 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-53 232 J-65 J-66 12 PVC 130 0.35 -724.68 2.06 0.001
P-54 395 J-66 J-67 12 PVC 130 0.75 -724.68 2.06 0.002
P-55 85 J-67 J-68 12 PVC 130 0.75 -724.68 2.06 0.002
P-56 70 J-70 J-71 8 PVC 120 0.4 0 0 0
Scenario 2 - Pipe Report
Label Length
(Scaled) (ft) Start Node Stop Node Diameter (in) Material HazenWilliams C Minor Loss
Coefficient
(Derived)
Flow (gpm) Velocity
(ft/s)
Headloss
Gradient
(ft/ft)
Scenario 2 - Pipe Report
P-57 18 J-71 J-72 6 PVC 120 1.24 0 0 0
P-58 90 J-25 J-68 10 PVC 120 1.28 248.99 1.02 0.001
P-59 18 J-69 J-73 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-60 93 J-70 J-28 8 PVC 120 1.28 -477.94 3.05 0.007
P-61 18 J-67 J-74 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-62 14 J-66 J-75 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-63 14 J-65 J-76 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-64 14 J-64 J-77 6 PVC 120 2.47 0 0 0
P-65 28 R-1 PMP-1 60 Ductile Iron 130 0 4,218.25 0.48 0 P-66 25 PMP-1 J-1 60 Ductile Iron 130 0 4,218.25 0.48 0 P-67 50 J-2 J-78 8 PVC 120 2.08 3.59 0.02 0
P-68 156 J-1 J-79 12 PVC 130 0.1 2,305.87 6.54 0.012
P-69 30 J-79 J-2 12 PVC 130 1.28 2,305.87 6.54 0.04
P-70 40 J-7 J-80 8 PVC 120 1.28 0.08 0 0
P-71 11 J-80 J-39 8 PVC 120 0 0 0 0
P-72 89 J-10 J-81 12 PVC 130 0.35 2,093.76 5.94 0.012
P-74 71 J-13 J-83 12 PVC 130 0.35 2,090.93 5.93 0.013
P-75 236 J-83 J-14 12 PVC 130 0.75 2,088.56 5.92 0.012
P-76 76 J-15 J-85 12 PVC 130 0.35 -1,911.59 5.42 0.011
P-77 137 J-86 J-16 12 PVC 130 0.35 -2,062.07 5.85 0.011 P-78 112 J-87 J-18 12 PVC 130 0.35 -665.9 1.89 0.001
P-79 70 J-53 J-88 12 PVC 130 1.28 -724.68 2.06 0.003
P-80 134 J-88 J-89 12 PVC 130 1.28 -724.68 2.06 0.002
P-81 33 J-89 J-64 12 PVC 130 1.28 -724.68 2.06 0.004
P-82 99 J-64 J-90 12 PVC 130 2.47 -724.68 2.06 0.003
P-83 209 J-90 J-65 12 PVC 130 2.47 -724.68 2.06 0.002
P-84 127 J-68 J-91 12 PVC 130 0.35 -475.68 1.35 0.001
P-85 5 J-91 J-69 12 PVC 130 0.35 -475.68 1.35 0.003
P-86 126 J-69 J-92 12 PVC 130 0.35 -475.68 1.35 0.001
P-87 28 J-92 J-93 12 PVC 130 0.35 -477.79 1.36 0.001
P-88 51 J-93 J-70 12 PVC 130 0.35 -477.94 1.36 0.001
P-89 112 J-18 J-19 6 Ductile Iron 130 0 -665.9 7.56 0.035 P-90 54 J-2 J-94 12 PVC 130 0.35 2,302.28 6.53 0.016
P-91 17 J-94 J-3 12 PVC 130 0.35 2,302.20 6.53 0.025
P-92 76 J-8 J-9 12 PVC 150 0.45 2,301.03 6.53 0.013
P-93 85 J-81 J-95 12 PVC 130 0.35 2,092.52 5.94 0.012
P-95 208 J-12 J-13 12 PVC 150 0.35 2,090.93 5.93 0.009
P-96 60 J-84 J-15 12 PVC 150 0.35 88.41 0.25 0
P-97 210 J-14 J-84 12 PVC 150 0.4 88.56 0.25 0
P-98 5 J-85 J-96 12 PVC 130 0.35 -2,061.59 5.85 0.047
P-99 110 J-96 J-86 12 PVC 130 0.35 -2,061.92 5.85 0.011 P-100 33 J-17 J-97 12 PVC 130 0.35 -637.8 1.81 0.002
P-101 10 J-97 J-87 12 PVC 130 0.35 -665.8 1.89 0.003
P-102 5 J-19 J-98 12 PVC 130 0 -665.96 1.89 0.001
P-103 82 J-98 J-20 12 PVC 130 0 -691.96 1.96 0.001
P-104 114 J-51 J-99 6 PVC 120 0 493.48 5.6 0.023
P-105 58 J-99 J-52 6 PVC 120 0 492.32 5.59 0.023
P-165 135 J-95 J-11 12 PVC 150 0.35 2,092.02 5.93 0.009 Label Elevation
(ft)
Pump
Definition
Status
(Initial)
Hydraulic
Grade
(Suction)
(ft)
Hydraulic
Grade
(Discharge)
(ft)
Flow (Total)
(gpm)
Pump Head
(ft)
PMP-1 77.07 PMP-1 On 77.07 203.31 4,218.25 126.24
Scenario 2 - Pump Report
Label Elevation (ft) Flow (Out net)
(gpm)
Hydraulic Grade
(ft)
R-1 77.07 4,218 77.07
Scenario 2 - Reservoir Report
Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx Appendix G
WaterCad Analysis Node and Pipe Layout

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Water System Analysis Amara, CPD-226M(3)
M:\2013\13-285 Primestor Camarillo\Water Study\13285 WA report.docx Appendix H
Resolution No. 2016-89
Cíty qf CømøríIIo
Department of Pablíc Works
601 Carmen Drive, Camarillo, CA 93010
Office: 805.388.5340 - Fax: 805.388.5387
December 22,2017
Primestor
201 South Figueroa St., Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Attn: Arturo Sneider
Subject: Water Demand Credit Requirement, Amara Project, CPD-226M(3) We have received and reviewed the resubmittal of the Amara project grading/improvement plans as well as the Water lmpact Study information included in the Water Systems Analysis prepared and submitted by DRC Engineering, which concludes that the Water Demand is 40 AFY for the entire Amara project, including the Topgolf area and the future building area on the southwest corner of the project. Based upon the City's review, the Water Demand Credit Requirement for the entire Amara project is 40 AFY x $8,825i4FY = $353,000.00.

This letter confirms that upon receipt by the City of Camarillo, prior to January 1, 2018, of the Water Demand Credit Requirement amount listed above, the Amara project's requirements of the City's Water Demand Credit Program adopted by Resolution No. 2016-89 (attached) will be satisfied for the entire Amara project, except that any phase of the Amara project must have approved public works construction (grading/improvement) plans, and demonstrate readiness to obtain a grading permit prior to the City of Camarillo issuing a will-serve letter for a new potable water service connection.

The City will not refund any portion of the Water Demand Credit Requirement amount listed above for any reason including if the final water demand of the Amara project is less than the Amara project's anticipated water demand listed above. lf the final water demand of the Amara project is greater than the anticipated water demand listed above, the requirements of the City's Water Demand Offset Program adopted by Resolution No. 2016-90 (attached) must be met for that portion of water demand which is greater than the anticipated water demand listed above, prior to the City of Camarillo issuing a will-serve letter for a new potable water service connection.

Sincere
Director of Public Works
Attachments:

Resolution No. 2016-89
Resolution No. 2016-90
RESOLUTTON NO.20l6-89

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CAMARILLO, CALIFORNIA, AMËNDING AND RESTATING
THE WATER DEMAND CREDIT PROGRAM ADOPTEÐ
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 14.12 {WATER CONSERVATION

MEASURES) OF THE CAMARILLO MUNICTPAL CODE
The City Council of the City of Camarillo resolves as follows:

SECTION l. Findlngs. The City Councilfinds as follows:

A. On November4, 2A15, the City Council of the City of Camarillo ('City') adopted Ordinance No. 1116, which amended the water conservation measures contained in Chapter

14.12 ol the Camarillo Municipal Code to address existing drought conditions^ B. Concurent with the adoption of Ordinance No. 1116, lhe City Council adopted Resolution No. 2015-127, which established a "Water Demand Credit Program" and related maximum project water demand schedule and water credit amount in order to provide a temporary mechanism for development with existing entitlements to offset its water demand should such development elect to utilize the Water Demand Credit Program in order to receive approval for new potable water service connections.

C. The City desires to amend the Water Demand Credit Program to clarify that such Program is available only to projects with existing entitlements as of the date the Program was originally adopted (e.9., "Eligible Projects") and to establish the timing for the sunset of the Program, as wellas to make other conforming amendments consistent with the City's amendments to Çhapter 14.12 adopted concurrent with this Resolution under Ordinance No, 1126.

SECTION 2. Environmental Findings. The City Councilexercises its independent judgment and finds that the enactment of this resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") under the CEQA Guidelines (Chapter 3 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations beginning at Section 15000), specifically, Section 15307, which exempts "action taken by regulatory agencies .,. to assure the maintenance, restoration, and enhancement of a natural resource," because the actíon taken in adopting this Resolution will help malntain water resources; Section 15061(bX3), because the adoption of this Resolution will implement a regulatory process that will not foreseeably result in construction or other physical activities, either directly or indirectly, and that therefore the enactment of this Resolution does not have the potential to result in any signlficant effects on the environmenl; Section 15269(c), as an action necessary to mitigate thç State's drought emergency; and Section 15378(b)(4), which exempts government fiscal activities which do not involve any commítment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.

SECTION 3. Adoption of the Water Demand Credlt Program. The City Council hereby amends and restates the Water Demand Credit Program as set forth in the attached Exhibit A.

SECTTON 4. Effective Date. This Resolution will take effect ímmediately upon its adoption.

SËCTION 6. Certification. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED on July 27,2016.

Attested to on
Clerk
I, Jeffrie Madland, City Clerk of the City of Camarillo, certify that Resolution No. 2016- B9 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Camarillo at a regular meeting held on July 27 ,2016, by the following vote:

AYES: Craven, Kildee, McDonald, Mayor Morgan tt
NOES: Little
ABSENT: None
Clerk
,ilnt
Resolution No, 2016-89