City Council Agenda
City of Campbell, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California
NOTE: To protect our constituents, City officials, and City staff, the City requests all members of the public follow the guidance of the California Department of Health Servi ces', and the County of Santa Clara Health Officer Order, to help control the spread of COVID-19.
Additional information regarding COVID-19 is available on the City's website at www.campbellca.gov.
This City Council Regular meeting will be conducted in person as well as telecommunication and is compliant with provisions of the Brown Act.
The City Council meeting will be live -streamed on Channel 26, the City's website and on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/CityofCampbell for those who only wish to view the meeting.
Those members of the public wishing to provide public comment virtually are asked to register in advance at: https://www.campbellca.gov/signup. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting. Members of the public may attend the meeting in person at Campbell City Hall - Council Chambers.
Public comment will also be accepted via email at [email protected] prior to the start of the meeting. Written comments will be posted on the website and distributed to the Council. If you choose to email your comments, please indicate in the subject line “FOR PUBLIC COMMENT” and indicate the item number.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CAMPBELL CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, April 5, 2022 7:30 p.m.
City Hall Council Chamber – 70 N. First Street
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
ORAL REQUESTS
NOTE: This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the City Council on any matter not on the agenda. Persons wishing to address the Council are requested, but not required to complete a Speaker’s Card. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes. The law generally prohibits the Council from discussion or taking action on such items. However, the Council may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Requests.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTE: All matters listed under consent calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a request is made by a member of City Council, City staff, or a member of the public.
Any person wishing to speak on any item on the consent calendar should ask to have the item removed from the consent calendar prior to the time the Council votes to approve. If removed, the item will be discussed in the order in which it appears.
1. Minutes of City Council Regular Meeting of March 15, 2022 Recommended Action: Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of March 15, 2022.
2. Approving Bills and Claims
Recommended Action: Approve the bills and claims in the amount of $1,085,722.01.
3. Monthly Investment Transactions Report (February 2022) Recommended Action: That the City Council review and accept the Monthly Investment Transactions Report for February 2022.
4. 2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a Resolution acknowledging receipt of the 2021 Fire Marshal, State Mandated Inspection Report for the City of Campbell.
5. Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a 5 -Year Lease Agreement on Behalf of the Santa Clara County Specialized Enforcement Team (SCCSET) to Lease Office Space (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a Resol ution authorizing the City Manager to execute a 5 -year lease agreement on behalf of the Sant a Clara County Specialized Enforcement Team (SCCSET) to lease office space.
6. Initiate Proceedings of the Campbell Lighting and Landscaping District, Fiscal Year 2022-23 (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a Resol ution initiating proceedings, describing the improvements, and directing staff to prepare the Engineer’s Report for the Campbell Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
7. Authorization to Amend On -Call Materials Testing Servi ces Contract (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to amend the on -call Consultant Services Agreement with RMA Group for materials testing services by increasing the existing compensation in the amount of $250,000 to a revised not to exceed amount of $500,000.
8. Authorize Issuance of a Request for Qualifications for On -Call Labor Compliance Services (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the issuance of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for On -Call Labor Compliance Services and authorize the City Manager to execute a contr act with the selected labor compliance services provider for a five -year term in an amount n ot to exceed $300,000.
9. Resolution Congratulating Mark Thornton on Being Selected “Citizen of the Year” by the Campbell Chamber of Commerce (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a Resolution congratulating Mark Thornton on being selected Campbell’s 2021 “Citizen of the Year.”
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES
NOTE: Members of the public may be allotted up to two (2) minutes to comment on any public hearing item. Applicants/Appellants and their representatives may be allotted up to a total of five (5) minutes for opening statements and up to a total of three (3) minutes maximum for closing statements. Items requested/recommended for continuance are subject to Council’s consent at the meeting.
10. Public Hearing to Consider the Application (PLN -2021-201) of Susan Chen for a Planned Development Permit to Allow the Construction of Four Single-Family Homes; a Tentative Subdivision Map to Allow the Creation of Five Lots (Four Residential and One Common Lot); and a Parking Modification Permit to Allow Two of the Required Assigned Parking Spaces (Unit Specific), to be Provided as Guest Parking Spaces on Property Located at 1323 Elam Avenue. This Application is Intended to Reinstate Previous Approvals for a Planned Development Permit (PLN2017 -101), Tentative Subdivision Map (PLN2017 -102), and Parking Modification Permit (PLN2017-338) Which Expired (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Recommended Action: That the City Council ad opt a Resolution approving a Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, and Parking Modification Permit for the construction of four single -family homes, the creation of five lots (four single -family and one commonly owned lot), and two of the required assigned parking spaces to be provided as guest parking spaces for the property located at 1323 Elam Avenue.
NEW BUSINESS
11. Code Enforcement Program Enhancements
Recommended Action: That the City C ouncil provide policy direction on recommended Code Enforcement Program enhancements, including authorization for code amendments.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
12. Receive an Update on Business License Processes, Systems, and Recommended Improvements and Adopt a Re solution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Hinderliter, De Llamas and Associates (HdL) for Business License Software in an Amount Not to Exceed $85,900 (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Hinderliter, De Llamas and Associates (HdL) for Business License Software in an amount not to exceed $85,900.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
13. Council Committee Reports
Recommended Action: That the City Council report on activities from their committee assignments.
ADJOURN
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection wi th the agenda packet in the lobby of City Clerk’s Office, 70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA 95008, during normal business hours. These materials will also be available on the City website at https://www.ci.campbell.ca.us/agendacenter with the agenda packet following the last item of the agenda, subject to staff’s ability to post the documents prior to the meeting. All documents not posted prior to the meeting will be posted the next business day.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, listening assistive devices are available for all meetings held in the City Council Chambers. If you require accommodation, please contact the City Clerk’s Office, (408) 866-2117, at least one week in advance of the meeting.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
City of Campbell, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CAMPBELL CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, March 15, 2022 – 7:30 p.m.
City Hall Council Chamber – 70 N. First Street
This City Council meeting was duly noticed pur suant to open meeting requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act (G.C. Section 54956).
This meeting was recorded and can be viewed in its entirety at:
https://campbellca.gov/agendacenter and https://www.youtube.com/user/CityofCampbell.
CALL TO ORDER
The City Council of the City of Campbell convened this day in the regular meeting place, the City Hall Council Chamber, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California.
ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status
Paul Resnikoff Mayor Present
Anne Bybee Vice Mayor Present
Elizabeth 'Liz' Gibbons Councilmember Present
Susan M. Landry Councilmember Present
Sergio Lopez Councilmember Present
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Resnikoff led the Pledge of Allegiance.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS
1. Present Certificates of Recognition to the STEM Winners of the Santa Clara Valley Science and Engineering Fair Association (SCVSEFA) 2021 Synopsis Championship Science Fair
Recommended Ac tion: That the City Council recognize the Campbell student winners of the 2021 Synopsis Championship Science Fair.
Mayor Resnikoff recognized the Campbell student STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) winners of the Sant a Clara Valley Sc ience and Engineering Fair Association 2021 Synopsis Championship Science Fair.
Forrest Williams, Board Member of the Santa Clara Valley Science and Engineering Fair Association spoke in support of the Synopsis Championship Science Fair n oting that the event encourages all students across Santa Clara 1 Packet Pg. 5
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 15, 2022 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 15, 2022 City Council Meeting Page 2
County to participate in science. Winners of this sc ience fair go on to compete in National and International science competitions.
Councilmembers congratulated the winning students and note d how complex and impressive their science projects are.
2. Proclamation Declaring the Month of March 2022 as "Youth A rt Month" in the City of Campbell
Recommended Action: That the City Council proclaim the month of March 2022 as Youth Art Month in the City of Campbell.
Mayor Resnikoff presented the proclamation declaring the month of March 2022 as “Youth Art Month” in the City of Campbell.
Sofia Fojas, Santa Clara County Office of Education expressed appreciation to Council for recognizing Youth Art Mont h and announced the Young Artist Showcase being held on May 19, 2022.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
There were no communications and petitions.
ORAL REQUESTS
Ken Johnson, Campbell Chamber of Commerce, announced the 2022 Celebrate Campbell Event being held on March 19, 2022 where the Citizen of the Year and Business of the Year will be announced and noted that this year three graduating Campbell seniors will be awarded scholarships.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
City Hall is open to the public for in -person services Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. For your convenience, online services such as permits, busine ss license applications and virtual appointments are available online. Visit the city’s website at www.campbellca.gov to view information for all city departments and services available.
The City Clerk’s Office is accepting applications for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. To find out more about this Committee, or to apply, please contac t the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 866 -2117 or visit the city’s website at www.campbellca.gov.
Application deadline is April 8, 2022 at 5:00 p.m.
Read Beyond the Beaten Path. Summer reading at the Campbell Expres s Library begins June 1, 2022 and is free and open to all ages. You can register at the library or online at www.sccld.org.
Public Recreation Swimming Returns. Cool off this summer at the Campbell Community Center pool with family and friends. Swim passes are available. For more information, please visit www.campbellca.gov.
1 Packet Pg. 6
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 15, 2022 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 15, 2022 City Council Meeting Page 3
Registration for Campbell Recreation Pre -school is available for everyone on March 16, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. For more inf ormation about Pre -school programs, please go to www.campbellca.gov/preschool.
The Campbell Museum is hosting its second biennial Juried Art Show to be on display at the Ainsley House, July t hrough October, 2022. Guidelines for submissions can be found on the Campbell Museums' website at www.campbellmuseums.com. The deadline for submissions is April 15, 2022.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Resnikoff asked if anyone wished to remove an item from the Consent Calendar.
The Consent Calendar was considered as follows:
3. Minutes of City Council Special Meeting of February 24, 2022 Recommended Action : Approve the Special Meeting minutes of February 24, 2022.
This action approves the City Council Special Meeting minutes of February 24, 2022.
4. Minutes of City Council Executive Session Meeting of March 1, 2022 Recommended A ction: Approve the Executive Session Meeting minutes of March 1, 2022.
This action approves the Executive Session Meeting minutes of March 1, 2022.
5. Minutes of City Council Regular Meeting of March 1, 2022 Recommended Action: Approve the Regular Meeting minutes of March 1, 2022.
This action approves the Regular Meeting minutes of March 1, 2022.
6. Approving Bills and Claims
Recommended Action: That the City Council approve the bills and claims in the amount of $873,459.00.
This ac tion approves the bills and claims in the amount of $873,459.00 as follows: bills and claims che cks dated February 14, 2022, in the amount of $327,142.47; payroll checks dated February 17, 2022, in the amount of $61,120.14; and bills and claims checks date d February 21, 2022, in the amount of $485,196.39.
7. Second Reading of Ordinance 2279 Confirmin g a By -District Election Process in Five Council Districts and Redistricting Said District Boundaries (Ordinance/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council approve the second reading and adopt Ordinance 2279 confirming a by -District electi on process in five Council districts and redistricting said district boundaries.
1 Packet Pg. 7
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 15, 2022 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 15, 2022 City Council Meeting Page 4
This action approves the second reading and adopts Ordinance 2279 confirming a by-District election process in five Council districts and redistricting said district boundaries.
8. Extension of Declaration of Local Emergency (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a resolution extending the January 18, 2022 City Council proclamation declaring the existence of a local emergency resulting from community spread of COVID-19.
Resolution 12809 extends the January 18, 2022 City Council proclamation declaring the existence of a local emergency resulting from community spread of COVID-19.
M/S: Bybee/Landry – That the City Council approve the Conse nt Calendar.
The motion was adopted by the following roll call vote:
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Bybee
SECONDER: Landry
AYES: Gibbons, Landry, Lopez, Bybee, Resnikoff
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES
There were no Public Hearings and Introduction of Ordinances.
NEW BUSINESS
9. 2021 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council receive public comment and adopt a Resolution accepting the Housing Element Annual Pr ogress Report and directing staff to file the Annual Progress Report with the required State agencies.
Community Development Director Rob Eastwood and Senior Planner Stephen Rose, introduced the Staff Report dated March 15, 2022 and reviewed the City’s 2021 housing progress, the Regional Hou sing Needs Assessment (RHNA) income level assignments, and the City’s housing effort accomplishments.
In response to inquiries, Senior Planner Rose clarified that once construction projects are entitled, the property o wners can take years to pull the offi cial building permits. The City has time limits once permits are pulled, but the entire timeline to project completion is often out of the City’s control.
In response to an inquiry relating to Accessory Dwelling Unit ( ADU) production, Senior Planner Rose noted that the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has opined that ADU’s can be included as below market rate housing production if a market rate study has been completed.
The Association of Bay Area Governments has completed that required study but 1 Packet Pg. 8
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 15, 2022 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 15, 2022 City Council Meeting Page 5
not in time for this year’s reporting requirement. ADU production numbers can be reported retroactively on next year’s report.
Councilmember Gibbons requested the Community Development Department add context to the comments section of the report describing other efforts made by the City to maintain existing below market rate housing or improve the cities stock of housing.
Mayor Resnikoff opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to speak.
Steve Saunders, Campbell resident, spoke of his concerns relating to the annual report and asked what the ramifications of such low numbers could be for the City.
Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Resnikoff closed the public hearing.
Councilmembers expressed concerns relating to housing issues and noted that the new State Laws were passed to address this very situation. Many other cities in the Bay Area are not producing an y housing. However, developers have to bring low income housing proje cts forward for consideration. The City does not build housing on its own.
M/S: Landry/Lopez – That the City Council receive public comment and adopt Resolution 12810 accepting the Housi ng Element Annual Progress Report and directing staff to file the Ann ual Progress Report with the required State agencies. The motion was adopted by the following roll call vote:
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Landry
SECONDER: Lopez
AYES: Gibbons, Landry, Lopez, Bybee, Resnikoff
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
10. Update on Campbell's Plan for Housing
Recommended Action: That the City Council receive a report on the upcoming review of policies and programs for Campbell’s Housing Element Update (“Campbell’s Plan for Housing ”), including the upcoming schedule, stakeholder outreach, and initial list of discussion areas, policies and programs to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council during this process.
Community Development Director Eastwood int roduced Staff Report dated March 15, 2022 and reviewed the project timeline and key milestones.
Geoff Bradley, M-Group Representative, reviewed the RHNA allocation assigned to the City noting that after final review by the City Council on January 25, 2022 , the final number of sites to be reviewed during the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is 6,644. It is expected that some sites will be deemed inappropriate and removed from final inclusion following the EIR process.
Sung Kwon, M -Group Representative, re viewed the EIR tentative schedule noting the target completion date in the late fall/early winter 2022. Mr. Sung 1 Packet Pg. 9
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 15, 2022 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 15, 2022 City Council Meeting Page 6
reviewed the upcoming outreach efforts including outreach to special needs populations for feedback regarding below market rate housing policy refinement.
Based on stakeholder feedback, initial policies and prog rams to be considered and investigated further include improving housing affordability, preserving existing affordable housing stock, removing governmental constraints, promoting resiliency and sustainability in housing, and addressing special needs groups through Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) policies. Mr. Sung reviewed the related workplan efforts including zoning ordinance updates.
Director Eastwood highlighted a coordination effort with Cal Poly San Luis Obispo City & Regional Planning D epartment, where Master and Bachelor students in Urban Planning engage in a light rail station area planning project that will envision how higher density housing can be structured around the light rail stations and provide initial concepts on station area plans. This work is to be part of their spring curriculum.
In response to an inquiry, Director Eastwood noted that the EIR will study parcels at the density planned for, which would not include any density bonus additions.
Councilwoman Landry encouraged City Staff to advertise public outreach notices in the Campbell Press.
Mayor Resnikoff opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to speak.
Raja Pallela, Campbell resident, expressed concern that there were no housing site selections made in the southern parts of the City.
Mark Field, Campbell resident, asked how many floors are included in a 75 -unit building.
Sarah Chaffin, Campbell resident, spoke of ways she felt could lead to increased affordable housing production including lessening/re moving developer fees and increasing Staff autonomy in collaborating with developers.
Bruce Bowen, Campbell resident, stated that as a developer going above 60 ft when building escalates costs very quickly, and asked for clarification on specific parcel densities identified in the site selection map.
Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Resnikoff closed the public hearing.
In response to inquiries, Director Ea stwood stated that a 75 -unit building could potentially include 15 feet for retail with 3 -4 resident stories above. The sites on Gilman Avenue were set at 60 units per acre to match the neighboring parcels and in keeping with adjacent neighborhood themes.
Councilmembers provided individual comments on the site selection map going into the EIR and noted areas of concern or clarification.
In response to inquiries, Director Eastwood clarified that Staff took a broad approach for mixed-use possibilities going into the EIR, knowing that coming out 1 Packet Pg. 10
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 15, 2022 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 15, 2022 City Council Meeting Page 7
of the EIR, the best locations for it would be iden tified. The land use designations listed on the site selection map will be better defined as this process moves forward.
Councilmember Bybee requested to add the San ta Clara County Office of Supportive Housing to the stakeholder service provider list.
11. Review of the City’s Below -Market Rate Housing Program and Identified Improvement Plan
Recommended Action: That the City Council provide direction on the recommended Below-Market Rate Housing Program improvement plan.
Community Development Director East wood introduced Staff Report dated March 15, 2022 and noted that with this years Housing Element, and the required RHNA assignment f or development of below market rate housing, the City will need to put a renewed focus on the Below Market Rate Program and make certain improvements to make it a sustainable program into the future. During the mid-year budget adjustments Council approved additional funding for consultant services to assist City Staff in reviewing and identifying long term improvements to the City’s Below Market Rate Housing Program.
Senior Planner Rose presented the staff recommended short term improvements to the program , including an updated scope of services with Housekey’s Inc., updated housing agreements, increasing of fees to homebuilder s, updated rules around eligibility review and occupancy standards, clarifications to the ownership program including minimum builder standards and updated owner guides relating to repairs and upkeep and resale pricing procedures, expanded loan programs to address the missing middle and improvements to the compliance program.
In response to an inquiry, Senior Planner Rose stated that City Staff does receive complaint calls from the Below Market Rate Program participants. Housekey’s does track metrics on c ustomer service, but those metrices don’t always identify the underlying issue of concerns given the complexities of the program and rules.
Councilmember Gibbons requested additional information on the rules that govern when there is a conflict between th e City’s inclusionary ordinance and a density bonus project, specifically in terms of equity sharing and how that impacts the housing stock in the below market rate program of the City.
Councilmembers discussed the need for an evaluation of Housekey’s, In c., performance to better identify whether Program Administrator improvements are needed or program improvements are needed.
Director Eastwood and Senior Planner Rose emphasized Staff’s recommendations to implement the identified structural program change s, clear metrics, and contract standards and performance measures prior to auditing Housekey’s, Inc. performance. As the City and Ho usekey’s, Inc. are in a partnership with one another, and through the pandemic Housekey’s, Inc. has implemented customer ser vice and program enhancements outside of their previously identified scope of services.
1 Packet Pg. 11
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 15, 2022 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 15, 2022 City Council Meeting Page 8
Mayor Resnikoff opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to speak.
Julius Nyanda, Housekey’s, Inc. Representative, stated that given the expected increase in affordable housing programs across the Bay Area, Housekey’s is willing to reduce their administration fee, so the City can hire a full-time Housing Manager, as City’s who have this resource have shown to offer a more robust program.
Raja Pallela, Camp bell resident, suggested the City waive permit fees in proportion to the affordable housing units being built and stated that multi -unit mixed-use housing is a great benefit to those needing affordable housing.
Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Resnikoff closed the public hearing.
Councilmembers confirmed consensus for Staff to implement necessary program changes to adequate ly administer the program and effectively evaluate Housekeys, Inc., such as the annual code review, updated scope of service s, updated rules around eligibility and occupancy standards, improvements to the compliance program, clarifications to the ownership program, and improvements to the compliance program.
Councilmembers requested additional information relating to homebuild er fee proposals and ways in which to improve fiscal sustainability.
Director Eastwood summarized that Council’s feedback would be included in the contract negotiations with Housekey’s, Inc. going forward with a contract coming back to Council in Summer 2 022. The long-term program sustainability feedback will be included as part of the consultant review.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
12. Council Committee Reports
Recommended Action: That the City Council report on activities from their committee assignments.
Councilmember Gibbons, as part of her duties with the Silicon Valley Clean Energy Authority, attended a tour of the new solar storage facility in King County which has the ability to store enough battery backup power for the entire City.
In the interest of time, Councilmembers held their Council Committee Reports.
ADJOURN
Mayor Resnikoff adjourned the meeting at 10:45 p.m.
APPROVED:
1 Packet Pg. 12
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 15, 2022 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 15, 2022 City Council Meeting Page 9
ATTEST:
Paul Resnikoff, Mayor
Dusty Christopherson, City Clerk
1 Packet Pg. 13
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 15, 2022 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) City
Council
Report
TITLE: Approving Bills and Claims
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve the bills and claims in the amount of $1,085,722.01.
DISCUSSION
The bills and claims that have been a udited and approved by staff for payments made as noted below:
Type Check Date Amount
Bills & Claims February 28, 2022 $509,904.31
Payroll March 3, 2022 $34,359.99
Bills & Claims March 7, 2022 $236,647.73
Bills & Claims March 14, 2022 $304,809.98
Total $1,085,722.01
FISCAL IMPACT
Requested action does not require a budget adjustment. Adequate funding was available to cover all expenses as listed.
Item: 2
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
2 Packet Pg. 14
Prepared by:
Roberto Garcia-Acosta, Accounting Clerk
II
Reviewed by:
Will Fuentes, Finance Director
Approving Bills and Claims Page 2 of 2
2 Packet Pg. 15
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Approved by:
City
Council
Report
TITLE: Monthly Investment Transactions Report (February 2022)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council review and accept the Monthly Investment Transactions Report for February 2022.
BACKGROUND
On August 17, 2021, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 -22 City of Campbell Investment Policy Update. Included as part of the updated policy was the addition of Monthly Investment Transaction Reports. As req uired by California Government Code (GC) Section 53607, staff will submit to Council Monthly Investment Transaction Reports within 45 days of the prior month end that show a listing of investments purchased, sold, called, or that have reached maturity, alo ng with any Local Agency Investment Fund ( LAIF) transfers. This is in addition to the Quarterly Investment Report, which shows a number of other items listed under Section VII.A of the City’s Investment Policy and has been historically prepared by staff and submitted to Council within 30 days from the end of the prior quarter.
DISCUSSION
This Monthly Investment Transaction Report covers February 2022. As shown in Attachment A, staff made several withdrawals from the City’s Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) account to support ongoing operating expense cash flow needs and to fund $3.00 million in new Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) investment security purchases.
The withdrawals from LAIF totaling $6.5 million were offset by a $1.6 million deposit, resulting in a net decrease to the City’s LAIF account balance of $4.9 million. The withdrawals from LAIF cover ed Meas ure O debt service, mandatory excess vacation payouts in payroll, and the investment in the 3 securities. Staff anticipates purchasing additional investments as fixed income interest rates continue to rise. Since the start of the COVID -19 pandemic, staff has largely held off on purchasing new long-term investments so as to maintain sufficient liquidity necessary to support ongoing City operations during a time of economic uncertainty . However, consistent with the recommended F iscal Year (FY) 2021-22 Investment Strategy accepted by Council on August 17, 2021, staff has revised this approach in the current fiscal year and started to look for longer -term investment opportunities outside of LAIF; thereby providing a higher, yet still safe return consistent with the City’s Investment Policy. With the Item: 3
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
3 Packet Pg. 16
Monthly Investment Transactions Report (February 2022) Page 2 of 2 pandemic being brought under better control and the current LAIF investment rate being quite low at 0.278%, staff believes that this is a fiscally prudent approach and will continue to look for attractive and appropriate longer -term investment opportunities throughout FY 2021 -22; contingent on a continued positive economic trend and stabilization of the pandem ic’s negative impacts. Please note that all investment purchases made adhere to the City’s Investment Policy.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with reviewing and accepting the Monthly Investment Transactions Report.
3 Packet Pg. 17
Prepared by:
John Formale, Accountant
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Monthly Investment Activity Report-2.28.22
Reviewed by:
Will Fuentes, Finance Director
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Monthly Investment Transactions Report
February 1 to February 28, 2022
Account Trans. Date Feb 2022
LAIF - ******137
Average Monthly Yield 0.278%
Beginning Balance 47,666,455$
Withdrawal 2/2/2022 -1,100,000.00
Withdrawal 2/7/2022 -900,000.00
Withdrawal 2/14/2022 -300,000.00
Withdrawal 2/16/2022 -600,000.00
Withdrawal 2/22/2022 -3,600,000.00
Deposit 2/28/2022 1,600,000
Monthly Total (4,900,000)
Ending Balance 42,766,455$
Account Trans. Date Feb 2022
Bank of New York (BNY) - ******818
Beginning Balance 9,000,000$
Transactions
Invest. Purchase - FHLB (1.25%, 2.5% & 5.0% Step up Yield; 3.00 Yrs) 2/28/2022 1,000,000 Invest. Purchase - FHLB (2.0% Yield; 3.00 Yrs) 2/28/2022 1,000,000 Invest. Purchase - FHLB (1.75% Yield; 2.00 Yrs) 2/28/2022 1,000,000 Monthly Total 3,000,000
Ending Balance 12,000,000$
3.a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Monthly Investment Activity Report-2.28.22 (Monthly Investment Transactions Report (February 2022)) City
Council
Report
TITLE: 2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a Resolution acknowledging receipt of the 2021 Fire Marshal, State Mandated Inspection Report for the City of Campbell.
BACKGROUND
Each year, the Santa Clara County Fire Department is required by California Health and Safety Code Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 to inspect all public and private schools , hotels, motels, lodging houses and apartments for compliance with building standards.
As described in the memo provided in Attachment B, a 2018 approved Senate Bill No. 1205 added California Health and Safety Code Section 13146.4, which requires all fire departments to report their compliance, annually, to its administering authority. This new section also requires that the administering authority provides a resolution (Attachment A) acknowledging receipt of the inspection report.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with accepting the 202 1 Fire Inspection report and adopting a resolution acknowledging receipt of the report. Fire Marshal services are provided through the City’ s agreement with the Santa Clara County Fire Department and all costs are incorporated into the City’s Fiscal Year 2022 Operating Budget.
Prepared by:
Gary Berg, Police Chief
Item: 4
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
4 Packet Pg. 19
2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report Page 2 of 2
4 Packet Pg. 20
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Resolution - 2021 Fire Inspection Report
b. Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report
RESOLUTION NO. __________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL
ACKNOWLEDING RECEIPT OF A REPORT MADE BY THE FIRE CHIEF OF THE SANTA
CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING THE INSPECTION OF CERTAIN
OCCUPANCIES REQUIRED TO PERFORM ANNUAL INSPECTIONS IN SUCH OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13146.2 AND 13146.3 OF THE
CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE
WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 13146.4 was added in 2018, and became effective on September 27, 2018;
WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 requires all fire departments, including the Santa Clara County Fire Department , that provide fire protection services to perform annual inspections in every building used as a public or private school, hotel, motel, lodging house, apartment house, and certain residential care facilities for compliance with building standards, as provided; WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 13146.2 requires all fire departments, including the Santa Clara County Fire Department, that provide fire protection services to report annually to its administering authority on its compliance with Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 as provided in Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Campbell intends this Resolution to fulfill the requirements of the California Health & Safety Code regarding acknowledgment of the Santa Clara County Fire Department ’s compliance with California He alth and Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell expressly acknowledges the measure of compliance of the Santa Clara County Fire Department with California Health and Safety Code Sections 13 146.2 and 13146.3 in the area encompassed by the Fire District, as follows:
1. EDUCATIONAL GROUP E OCCUPANCIES: Educational Group E occupancies are generally those public and private schools, used by more than six persons at any one time for educational purposes through the 12th grade.
During calendar year 202 1, Santa Clara County F ire Department completed the following State Mandated annual inspections for Group E:
City of Campbell - Schools - (Group E Occupancies) 93.4% Completed (57 out of 61)
2. RESIDENTIAL GROUP R OCCUPANCIES: Residential Group R occupancies, for the purposes of this resolution, are generally those occupancies containing sleeping units and includes hotels, motels, apartments (three units or more), etc. as well as other residential occupancies (including
4.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Resolution - 2021 Fire Inspection Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report) a several residential care facilities). These residential care facilities have a several different sub- classifications, and they may contain residents or clients that have a range of needs, including those related to custodial care, mobility impairments, cognitive disabilities, etc. The residents may also be no n- ambulatory or bedridden.
During calendar year 202 1, Santa Clara County Fire Department completed the following State Mandated annual inspections for Group R:
City of Campbell – Hotels/Motels - (Group R -1 Occupancies) 83.3% Completed (5 out of 6)
City of Campbell – Apartment Buildings – (Group R-2 Occupancies) 98.7% Completed (805 out of 815)
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _______ day of _________, 2022, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
APPROVED:
________________________
Paul Resnikoff, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Dusty Christopherson, City Clerk
4.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Resolution - 2021 Fire Inspection Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report) March 7, 2022
City of Campbell
70 N. First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
Subject: Fire Marshal Report for 2021 - State Mandated Inspections Dear Council Members,
The purpose of this report is to provide an update of the fire inspection practices related to the annual inspection of state regulated occupancies; public and private schools (E occupancies), hotels/motels (R-1 occupancies) and apartment buildings (R-2 occupancies). California Health and Safety Code stipulates the following inspection frequency for the above referenced occupancies:
H & S Section 13146.2 (a): Requires every city or county fire department or district providing fire protection services to enforce specified building standards adopted by the State Fire Marshal to annually inspect certain structures, including hotels, motels, lodging houses, and apartment houses, for compliance with building standards.
H & S Section 13146.3: Requires the chief of any city or county fire department or district providing fire protection services and his or her authorized representatives to inspect every building used as a public or private school within his or her jurisdiction, for the purpose of enforcing specified building standards, not less than once each year.
Senate Bill No. 1205: Requires every city or county fire department, city and county fire department, or district required to perform the above -described inspections to report annually to its administering authority, as defined, on the department’s or district’s compliance with the above -described inspection requirements, as provided. The bill requires the administering authority to acknowledge receipt of the report in a resolution or a similar formal document. To the extent this bill would expand the responsibility of a local agency, the bill would create a state-mandated local program.
Campbell State Mandated Inspections Completed for calendar year 2021:
Schools – (Group E Occupancies)
93.4% Completed (57 out of 61)
• See Attached Listing
4.b
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report) Hotels/Motels (Group R-1 Occupancies)
83.3% Completed (5 out of 6)
• See Attached Listing
Apartment Buildings (Group R-2 Occupancies)
98.7% Completed (805 out of 815)
• See Attached Listing
NOTE: There are a number of factors as to why some facilities were not inspected in calendar year 2021. These factors may be due to the following; unable to contact building owner, facility was out of business or facility was closed due to Public Health Directive (Covid-19). If a facility was not inspected in calendar year 2021, we will make every effort to do so once the facility has reopened. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have regarding the data contained in this report.
Sincerely,
Hector Estrada
Deputy Chief, Fire Prevention
Santa Clara County Fire Department
Office: 408-341-4440
4.b
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report) Exhibit A
4.b
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report)
4.b
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Campbell State Mandated Inspections - Report (2021 Fire Marshal Inspection Report) City
Council
Report
TITLE: Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a 5 -Year Lease Agreement on Behalf of the Santa Clara County Specialized Enforcement Team (SCCSET) to Lease Office Space (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a 5 - year lease agreement on behalf of the Santa Clara County Specialized Enforcement Team (SCCSET) to lease office space.
BACKGROUND
For over 35 years, the Campbell Police Department has participated in the Santa Clara County Specialized Enforcement Team (SCCSET), a county -wide task force. The mission of SCCSET is to promote interagency collaboration to prevent, su ppress, and combat the impact of violent and career criminals, Post Release Community Supervision ( PRCS)/AB109 offenders, major narcotic offenders, human trafficking offenders, criminal organizations and gangs, firearms traffickers, and other significant crimes to increase public safety in Santa Clara County. In addition to the Campbell Police Department, many different law enforcement agencies assign personnel resources to SCCSET.
SCCSET has been a tremendous asset to the City of Campbell over the years a nd has been instrumental in solving or assisting in a number of high profile and significant cases including murders, armed robberies, gang, narcotics and weapons cases.
There is a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Campbell and agencies participating in SCCSET identifying the Campbell Police Department as the managing agency of the SCCSET Task Force. The following are the current participants:
City of Campbell City of Santa Clara
City of San Jose City of Mountain View
City of Sunnyvale City of Milpitas
City of Gilroy Town of Los Gatos
City of Palo Alto City of Los Altos
City of Morgan Hill Santa Clara County
Sheriff Santa Clara County District Attorney
Item: 5
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
5 Packet Pg. 94
Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement Page 2 of 3 Santa Clara County Probation
California State Parole – Division of Adult Parole Operations (DAPO) California Highway Patrol
San Jose State University Police
California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
SCCSET has been housed at the same location since 2011 when it vacated an office building in San Jose where it was previously located . In 2011, the City of Campbell Interim City Manager entered into a 10 -year lease agreement on behalf of SCCSET to lease office space after being authorized to do so by the City Council. As SCCSET’s previous lease has reached its expiration, SCCSET is se eking a new five -year lease at the same location.
DISCUSSION
SCCSET is now collocated with the Regional Auto Theft Task Force (RATTF) and the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office Human Trafficking Task Force. The Campbell Police Department has Detectives assigned to both SCCSET and RATTF.
The three task forces are now currently evenly splitting the rental cost. SCCSET additionally received $40,000 for office rent/expenses through the Northern California High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area initiative.
The law enforcement agencies participating in SCCSET pay for the salaries of their assigned personnel. Each agency with an officer or agent assigned to the task force contributes $5,000 a year toward the operating cost of SCCSET to include rent. Each agency that does not have an officer or agent assigned contributes $10,000 a year.
The property owner has negotiated an acceptable lease agreement and the facility continues to meet the needs of the task force s. Due to limitations placed on SCCSET , as a result of their grant funding status, they cannot legally enter into a lease agreement for their office space. As a result, they must rely on a local jurisdiction, Campbell in this case as the managing agency, to sign on their behalf. Although Campbe ll signs the agreement, SCCSET will pay the required rent and all other costs to the landlord, utility companies, etc. No City of Campbell funds will be used.
As the SCCSET Task Force, in addition to the other two task forces housed in the same location, are undercover units, the physical address for the office building has not been disclosed and was redacted from the attached lease agreement for safety and security purposes.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City. SCCSET will fully pay for all costs associated with the lease agreement.
5 Packet Pg. 95
Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement Page 3 of 3 Prepared by:
Dan Livingston, Police Captain
Reviewed by:
Gary Berg, Police Chief
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Resolution - SCCSET Lease Agreement
b. SCCSET Lease Agreement
5 Packet Pg. 96
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A 5-YEAR LEASE AGREEMENT
ON BEHALF OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY SPECIALIZED ENFORCMENT TEAM (SCCSET) TO LEASE OFFICE SPACE
WHEREAS, SCCSET has been a valuable law enforcement partner to the Campbell Police Department for over 35 years; and
WHEREAS, the previous 10-year lease agreement executed on behalf of SCCSET by the Interim City Manager of the City of Campbell has expired; and
WHEREAS, the current office space continues to meet the needs of the task force; and
WHEREAS, the SCCSET Commander has negotiated an acceptable lease agreement with the owner; and
WHEREAS, SCCSET must rely on the City of Campbell to sign the lease agreement on their behalf.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a 5-year lease agreement on behalf of SCCSET for office space.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this ______ day of _______, 2022 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
APPROVED:
___________________________
Paul Resnikoff, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Dusty Christopherson, City Clerk
5.a
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Resolution - SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 100
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 103
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 106
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 107
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 108
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 109
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 110
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 111
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 112
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 113
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 115
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 116
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 117
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 119
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 120
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement)
5.b
Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: SCCSET Lease Agreement (Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease Agreement) City
Council
Report
TITLE: Initiate Proceedings of the Campbell Lighting and Landscaping District, Fiscal Year 2022-23 (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Coun cil adopt a Resolution initiating proceedings, describing the improvements, and directing staff to prepare the Engineer’s Report for the Campbell Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
BACKGROUND
On June 23, 1980, the City C ouncil adopted Resolution No. 5831 approving the formation of the city-wide Campbell Landscaping and Lighting District (LLD) pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (LLA). The LLA requires the City Council to annually take a series of actions prior to the levy of annual assessments on properties within the LLD. The initial Council action required annually by the LLA is the adoption of a Resolution Initiating Proceedings and directing the preparation of the annual Engineer’s Report. The Engin eer’s Report is to describe the improvements to be maintained by the LLD and establish the annual assessments. This Resolution Initiating Proceedings is attached for the City Council’s consideration.
The LLA authorizes the use of LLD revenues for install ation, operation, and maintenance of a range of public improvements including the following: public lighting, traffic signals, street and median landscaping, parks and recreational improvements, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, irrigation and associated drainage improvements. The LLA also authorizes the use of revenues for acquisition of park and recreation land including acquisition of existing improvements, although Campbell has not taken advantage of this provision of the enabling legislation.
DISCUSSION
Staff is recommending no increase in LLD assessments for the upcoming fiscal year, nor any modification to the existing assessment formula rules. Any increase in assessments or modification of the assessment formula would be subject to the provisions of Propos ition 218, including requirements related to special versus general benefits and property owner approval voting provisions. LLD assessments have not been raised since July 1996, when a 10% increase was approved by the City Council to cover increased maintenance costs.
Item: 6
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
6 Packet Pg. 122
Lighting and Landscaping District, Fiscal Year 2022/23 Page 2 of 3 LLD assessment revenues have never completely covered the costs as described by the Engineer’s Report. General Fund, Gas Tax and other revenue sources are regularly used by the City to augment the LLD’s annual maintenance and operating budget.
SCHEDULE
The proposed schedule of City Council actions for the annual LLD assessment is as follows:
April 5, 2022 City Council adopts Resolution Initiating Proceedings and orders City Engineer to prepare Engineer’s
Report.
June 7, 2022 City Council grants preliminary approval of Engineer’s Report and adopts Resolution of Intention. Time and
place for the Public Hearing are set.
June 29, 2022 Resolution of Intention published in a local newspaper of general circulation.
July 6, 2022 Resolution of Intention published in a local newspaper of general circulation.
July 19, 2022 Public Hearing is held at the regular City Council meeting. City Council considers adoption of a
Resolution Overruling Protests, if any, ordering the
improvements a nd confirming the diagram and
assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
August 2, 2022 Diagram and assessment is filed with County Assessor by August 2, 2022.
FISCAL IMPACT
Projected LLD revenues for FY 2022-23 are approximately $1,210,000.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Direct staff to investigate increasing LLD assessments for FY 2022 -23. Any increase in assessments or modification of the assessment formula would be subject to the provisions of Proposition 218, including requirements related to special versus general benefits and property owner approval voting provisions.
2. Do not levy LLD assessments for FY 2022 -23. Not levying the assessments would require the City to find other sources of revenue or to cut services to mitigate the $1,210,000 projected to be collected in FY 2022-23. 6 Packet Pg. 123
Lighting and Landscaping District, Fiscal Year 2022/23 Page 3 of 3 6 Packet Pg. 124
Prepared by:
Roger Storz, Senior Civil Engineer
Reviewed by:
Todd Capurso, Director of Public Works
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL INITIATING
PROCEEDINGS FOR THE CITY OF CAMPBELL LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2022/23
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Campbell, California, as follows:
1. This City Council did, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, conduct proceedings for the formation of the City of Campbe ll Lighting District LLA-1 and for the levy and collection of Assessments for Fiscal Year 1980-1981, and did, on June 23, 1980, pursuant to proceedings duly had, adopt its Resolution No. 5381, a Resolution Overruling Protests and Ordering the Formation of an Assessment District and the Improvements and Confirming the Diagram and Assessments.
2. The public interest, convenience and necessity require, and it is the intention of said City Council to undertake proceedings for the levy and collection of assessments upon the parc els of land in said District, for the installation of improvements, including the maintenance and/or operation thereof for the Fiscal Year 2022-23.
3. The improvements to be constructed or installed, if any, including the maintenance and/or operation, shall include, in general, the following:
▪ Public lighting including traffic signals
▪ Landscaping
▪ Parks and recreational improvements including play equipment and public restrooms
▪ Appurtenances for maintenance of the above including curb, gutter, sidewalk, irrigation and drainage improvements and for acquisition of park or recreation land, and acquisition of existing improvements, if any.
4. The costs and expenses of said improvements, including the maintenance and/or operation, are to be ma de chargeable upon said District, the exterior boundaries of which District are the composite and consolidated area as more particularly shown on a map thereof on file in the Office of the Clerk of the City of Campbell to which reference is hereby made for further particulars. Said map indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory included in said District and of any zone thereof and shall govern for all details as to the extent of the assessment district.
5. The City Engineer of said City be, and is hereby, dire cted to prepare and file with said Clerk a report, in writing, referring to the assessment district by its distinctive designation, specifying the fiscal year to which the report applies, and, with respect to that year, presenting the following:
6.a
Packet Pg. 125
Attachment: Resolution (Lighting and Landscaping District, Fiscal Year 2022/23)
a) Plans and specifications for proposed new improvements, if any, to be made within the Assessment District;
b) An estimate of the costs of said proposed new improvements, if any, to be made, the costs of maintenance and/or operation thereof, and of any existing improvements, together with the incidental expenses in connection therewith;
c) A diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each parcel of land within the district as such parcel of land is shown on the County Assessor’s map for Fiscal Year 2022-23 each of which parcels shall be identified by a distinctive number or letter on said diagram; and
d) A proposed assessment of the total amount of the estimated costs and expenses of the proposed new improv ements, in accordance with Section 22569 of the California Streets and Highways Code, including the installation, if any, and the maintenance and/or operation thereof, and of any existing improvements upon the parcels in said District i n proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such parcels respectively from said improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or both, therefore, and of the expenses incidental thereto.
6. The City Engineer of said City be, and is he reby, designated as the office to answer inquiries regarding any protest proceedings to be had herein, and may be contacted during regular office hours at the Public Works Department, City Hall, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California 95008, or by calling (408) 866-2150.
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a Resolution duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Campbell, California, at a meeting thereof held on the ______ day of _____________, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
APPROVED:
______________________________
Paul Resnikoff, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Dusty Christopherson, City Clerk
6.a
Packet Pg. 126
Attachment: Resolution (Lighting and Landscaping District, Fiscal Year 2022/23) City
Council
Report
TITLE: Authorization to Amend On -Call Materials Testing Services Contract (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to amend the on- call Consultant Services Agreement with RMA Group for materials testing services by increasing the existing compensation in the amount of $250,000 to a revised not to exceed amount of $500,000.
BACKGROUND
The Public Works Department has the need to perform materials testing in conjunction with the design and construction of public works projects. The scope and cost of the materials testing required varies from project to project but is typically included as part of each project’s design, engineering, and construction phases. Materials testing is almost always necessary for each project throughout different phases of a project.
During the design phase, it may be necessary to gather soils information and perform field sampling, laboratory testing and analysis. In construction, materials testing is used to ascertain quality assurance on materials (concrete, aggregates, asphalt, etc.) provided or installed by the contractor. To gain efficiencies, executing an “on -call” agreement with one consultant for services on an as-needed basis will result in time and cost savings compared to hiring a consultant for each project. On -call agreements do not require committing upfront capital from a dedicated fund. Instead, individua l projects will be responsible for the cost of each service order based on individual project needs.
Furthermore, since the selected materials testing consultant is intended to perform work for local and federal funded projects, the selection and procureme nt process strictly follows the guidelines specified by the Caltrans consultant selection process contained in the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
On November 5, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 12374 authorizing the issuance of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Materials Testing Services and authorizing the Public Works Director to execute a contract with the selected materials testing services consultant. In May 2019, upon completion of the competitive selection process, the City executed a Consultant Services Agreement with the most qualified consultant, RMA Group. The term of the agreement is for a total amount of $250,000 with an expiration date of May 2024 (five -year term). Although there are two years remaining in th e agreement, the maximum compensation amount is nearly expended.
Item: 7
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
7 Packet Pg. 127
Authorization to Amend On-Call Materials Testing Services Contract Page 2 of 3 The remaining unexpended balance is already committed for upcoming projects in the near future.
DISCUSSION
Increasing the executed contract total compensation amount through an amendment is allowed by the terms of the executed Consultant Services Agreement with RMA Group.
To provide the City with continued materials testing services from a qualified materials testing laboratory for both federally and non -federally funded projects for the nex t two years (through May 2024), an amendment to increase the contract amount by $250,000 is proposed. Over the next two years, several Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects will be in various phases of design and construction. For example, to highligh t a few, there will be the Annual Street Maintenance projects, the John D. Morgan Park (Budd Avenue side) Restroom Improvement project, the Hamilton Avenue/Hwy 17 Southbound Offramp project, as well as others. These projects will all require field and laboratory materials testing services to ensure compliance with project specifications.
As many of these projects involve federal funds, observing the Caltrans Guidelines in the procurement of consultants is a necessity. Since the existing agreement was completed in compliance with Caltrans guidelines, the City will retain the assurance of obtaining grant reimbursement for eligible expenditures for those projects utilizing federal funds.
To date, the performance by RMA Group is meeting the scope and terms of their agreement. Since 2019, RMA Group has been supporting the City with materials testing and consultant services on an as -needed basis. The efficiencies in having an on -call materials services provider have been demonstrated in how frequently RMA Group has been called to assist with various projects. Previous projects where RMA Group has provided support include: Eden Avenue Sidewalks, Harriet Avenue Sidewalks, Harriet Avenue Traffic Calming, John D. Morgan Park Improvements, Campbell Park Improvements, Citywide ITS Enhancements and the Annual Street Maintenance projects.
Therefore, staff recommends City Council authorize an amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement with RMA Group by increasing the existing compensation term in the amount of $250,000 for a revised, not to exceed amount of $500,000. At the end of the five-year contract term in 2024, the City will initiate the procurement process for a new on-call services contract.
FISCAL IMPACT
Services under this contract will be performed under i ndividual purchase orders based on individual project needs. Each purchase order will be paid for using funds in the project budgets and no budget appropriation for these services is being requested at that time.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Do not authorize to amend the on-call Consultant Services Agreement with RMA Group and authorize staff to advertise for a new Request for Qualifications for 7 Packet Pg. 128
Authorization to Amend On-Call Materials Testing Services Contract Page 3 of 3 on-call materials testing and consultant services and execute an agreement with the most qualified consultant.
2. Require each pro ject to solicit and execute individual materials testing services agreements. This is not recommended due to the resources required to comply with the Caltrans’ Consultant Selection Guidelines for projects with federal funds.
Prepared by:
Amy Olay, City Engineer
Reviewed by:
Todd Capurso, Director of Public Works
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Resolution
7 Packet Pg. 129
RESOLUTION NO. ________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO AMEND THE ON -CALL CONSULTANT
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH RMA GROUP FOR MATERIALS TESTING
SERVICES BY INCREASING THE EXISTING COMPENSATION TERM IN THE AMOUNT OF $250,000 FOR A REVISED NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $500,000
WHEREAS, the City entered into a Consultant Services Agreement (contract) with RMA Group on May 17, 2019 with a five-year term, for a total amount not to exceed $250,000; and
WHEREAS, the maximum compensation amount in the contract is nearly expended; and
WHEREAS, any remaining unexpended balance is already committed for upcoming projects in the near-term; and
WHEREAS, a number of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects will be in various phases of design and construction over the next two years; and
WHEREAS, the efficiencies in having an on -call materials services provider have been demonstrated in how freque ntly RMA Group has been called to assist with various projects; and
WHEREAS, services under this contract will be performed under individual purchase orders based on individual project needs; and
WHEREAS, each purchase order will be paid for using funds in each individual project budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Campbell does he reby authorize the City Manager to amend the on-call Consultant Services Agreement with RMA G roup for materials testing services by increasing the e xisting compensation term in the amou nt of $250,000 for a re vised not to ex ceed amount of $500,000.
7.a
Packet Pg. 130
Attachment: Resolution (Authorization to Amend On-Call Materials Testing Services Contract)
PASSED AND ADOPTED this ____day of _________2022, b y the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
APPROVED:
________________________
ATTEST: Paul Resnikoff, Mayor
__________________________
Dusty Christopherson, City Clerk
7.a
Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: Resolution (Authorization to Amend On-Call Materials Testing Services Contract) City
Council
Report
TITLE: Authorize Issuance of a Request for Qualifications for On -Call Labor Compliance Services (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the issuance of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for On -Call Labor Compliance Services and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with the selected labor compliance services provider for a five-year term in an amount not to exceed $300,000.
BACKGROUND
California Labor Code requires prevailing wages be paid to all workers employed on a public works project over $1,000. In general, the definition of public works refers to construction, alteration, demolition, insta llation, or repair work done under contract and paid in whole or in part with public funds. Furthermore, contractors bidding on public works projects of more than $25,000 for construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work o f more than $ 15,000 for maintenance work are subject to the requirements of the California Labor Code Section 1725.5 to register with the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). DIR monitors and enforces prevailing wage and labor compliance requirements.
Pursuant to California Labor Code, the Public Works Department has the need to perform labor compliance services in conjunction with the construction of public works projects. Labor compliance efforts include monitoring the receipt of contractor and subcontractor certified payroll records monthly throughout the construction duration, and confirmation of contractor compliance with labor codes through job site inspection of wage rate postings and worker interviews.
Most of the projects whereby the City engages contractors will be subject to comply with DIR requirements. The scope and cost of labor compliance services varies from project to project. For instance, projects with federal grant funds require more rigorous labor compliance enforcement compared to one with only local funds. However, regardless of the types of projects, the City does not have the dedicated resources to perform the mandated labor compliance activities in -house and therefore, must rely on qualified labor compliance service consultants.
To gain efficiencies, executing an “on -call” agreement with one consultant for services on an as -needed basis will result in time and cost savings compared to hiring a Item: 8
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
8 Packet Pg. 132
RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services Page 2 of 3
consultant with each project. On -call agreements do not require committing upfront capital from a dedicated fund. Instead, individual projects will be responsible for the cost of each service order based on individual project needs. Furthermore, since the labor compliance services consultant is intended to perform work for locally and fe derally funded projects, the selection and procurement process would strictly follow the guidelines specified by Caltrans.
On December 4, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 12379 authorizing the issuance of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) fo r labor compliance services. In April 2019, after proceeding with the consultant selection process in accordance with Caltrans Guidelines, the Consultant Services Agreement between the City and GCAP Services (GCAP) from Costa Mesa, California was executed . The intent of a labor compliance consultant agreement is to make available on -call labor compliance services for projects either funded by federal or local funds. Because the consultant selection process adhered to the Caltrans Guidelines, it ensures eli gible expenditures for federally funded projects performed by the selected consultant are reimbursable through federal grant funds. Since the execution of their agreement, GCAP has conducted labor compliance services for many City projects.
DISCUSSION
Recently, GCAP informed the City of its inability to continue to provide resources in the Bay Area for DIR required construction job site interviews and inspection. Should the City elect to continue with GCAP (despite its lack of local staffing), the impl ications on the projects would be higher costs due to travel expenses and scheduling challenges.
The current agreement with GCAP expiring in 2024 can be left in place to serve as a secondary service provider. However, staff recommends that the City engage a labor compliance services consultant with a local presence to support upcoming projects, especially those funded with federal funds. Therefore, staff is seeking authorization from the City Council to advertise the RFQ for a new on -call labor compliance s ervices provider.
Over a term of five years, it is anticipated that projects requiring labor compliance services could cost up to $300,000. During the five years, should the amount be insufficient due to the introduction of unforeseen work, staff will r eturn to the City Council to seek an amendment to increase the compensation amount.
The attached resolution has been prepared for the City Council to authorize the issuance of a RFQ for on-call labor compliance services and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with the selected labor compliance provider for a five -year term in an amount not to exceed $300,000.
FISCAL IMPACT
Services under the Consultant Services Agreement will be performed under individual purchase orders based on individual project needs. Each purchase order will be paid for 8 Packet Pg. 133
RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services Page 3 of 3
using funds in the project budget and no budget appropriation for these services is being requested at this time.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Do not authorize the issuance of the RFQ but add dedicated City resources to enforce and monitor labor compliance for each public works project or risk being out of compliance with California Department of Industrial Relations requirements.
2. Continue to utilize the existing Consultant Services Agreement between the City and GCAP and increase project budgets and schedules to address travel expenses and scheduling impacts.
Prepared by:
Amy Olay, City Engineer
Reviewed by:
Todd Capurso, Director of Public Works
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Resolution
b. RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services
8 Packet Pg. 134
RESOLUTION NO. _________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBEL L
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)
FOR ON -CALL LABOR COMPLIANCE SERVICES AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH THE SEL ECTED LABOR
COMPLIANCE SERVICES PROVIDER FOR A FIVE -YEAR TERM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $300,000
WHEREAS, California Labor Code requires prevailing wages be paid to all workers employed on a public works project over $1,000; and
WHEREAS, contractors bidding on public works project s of more than $25,000 for construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work or more than $15,000 for maintenance work are subject to the requirements of the California Labor Code Section 1725.5 to register with the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR); and
WHEREAS, most of the projects whereby the City engages contractors will be subje ct to comply with DIR requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City does not have the dedicated resources to perform the mandated labor compliance activities in-house and therefore , must rely on qualified labor compliance service consultants; and
WHEREAS, to gain efficiencies , executing an “on-call” agreement with one consu ltant for servic es on an as -needed basis will res ult in time and cost savings compared to hiring a consultant with each project; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Caltrans Guidelines for consultant procurement and selection, the City en tered into a consultant services agreement with GCAP Services (GCAP) from Costa Mesa, California in April 2019; and
WHEREAS, GCAP informed the City of its inability to continue to provide resources in the Bay Area for DIR required construction job site interviews and inspection; and
WHEREAS, services under this contract will be perfo rmed under individual purchase orders based on individual project needs . Eac h p urchase order will be paid for using funds in the individual project budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RES OLVED that the City Council of the City of Campbell hereby authorizes the issuance of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for On-Call Labor Compliance Services and author ize the City Manager to execute a contract with the selected labor compliance services provider for a five -year term in an amount not to exceed $300,000.
8.a
Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: Resolution (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ______2022, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
APPROVED:
_______________________________
Paul Resnikoff, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Dusty Christopherson, City Clerk
8.a
Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: Resolution (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 150
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 151
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 152
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 156
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 161
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 163
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 164
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 165
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 166
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 168
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 175
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 188
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services)
8.b
Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: RFQ for Labor Compliance On-Call Services (RFP for On-Call Labor Compliance Services) City
Council
Report
TITLE: Resolution Congratulating Mark Thornton on Being Selected “Citizen of the Year” by the Campbell Chamber of Commerce (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a Resolution congratulating Mark Thornton on being selected Campbell’s 2021 “Citizen of the Year.”
BACKGROUND
Every year, t he Campbell Chamber of Commerce recognizes an outstanding individual in the community and names that person as its “Citizen of the Year.” Nominees are chosen for both their generous and their outstanding contributions to the Campbell community and the award recipient is honored at the Campbell Chamber of Commerce’s annual “Celebrate Campbell” event.
DISCUSSION
This year, Mark Thornton was chosen as the Campbell Chamber of Commerce ’s 2021 Citizen of the Year.
Mark willingly and enthusiastically contributes his time, energy, and talents to the Campbell Chamber of Commerce, the Campbell Chamber Commu nity Foundation, and the Downtown Campbell Business Association . Mark is also a dedicated leader and volunteer at The Home Church. Whatever is needed, Mark is there to lend a helping hand--from assisting with the distribution of food to those most in need to working with local teens to provide support and guidance. Also worth noting, in 2019, Mark was named Person of the Year by the Downtown Campbell Business Association. It is very clear that Mark is an asset to the Campbell community and exemplifies the true meaning of community contributor.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this recognition.
Item: 9
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
9 Packet Pg. 199
Resolution Congratulating Mark Thornton on Being Selected “Citizen of the Year” 2021 Page 2 of 2 9 Packet Pg. 200
Prepared by:
Dusty Christopherson, City Clerk
Attachment:
a. Resolution Citizen of the Year 2021
Approved by:
Angelique Gaeta, Assistant City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. __________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL CONGRATULATING MARK THORNTON AS 2021 CITIZEN OF THE YEAR
WHEREAS, Mark Thornton was selected by the Campbell Chamber of Commerce as the 2021 Citizen of the Year in recognition of h is commitment and significant contributions to the Campbell community , and was honored on March 19, 2022, at the annual “Celebrate Campbell” banquet; and
WHEREAS, Mark Thornton was previously selected as the 2019 Downto wn Campbell Business Associations Person of the Year; and
WHEREAS, Mark Thornton volunteers willingly and enthusiastically contributes his time, energy, and talents to the Campbell community; and
WHEREAS, Mark Thornton lends a helping hand at events for the Campbell Chamber of Commerce, the Campb ell Chamber Community Foundation, and the Downtown Campbell Business Association; and
WHEREAS, Mark Thornton serves as a dedicated leader and volunteer at The H ome Chuch; and
WHEREAS, Mark Thornton is always ready and will ing to le nd a helping hand with food distribution efforts to help those most in need; and
WHEREAS, Mark Thornton volunteers his time to support and guide local teens; and
WHEREAS, Mark Thornton’s attitude and community spirit exemplifies the qualities of the Campbell Citizen of the Year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESO LVED that the City Council of the City of Campbell congratulates Mark Thornton on being named Campbell’s 20 21 Citizen of the Year and recognizes his service to and involvement in the Campbell community.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this ______ day of _______, 2022 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
APPROVED:
Paul Resnikoff, Mayor
ATTEST:
Dusty Christopherson, City Clerk
9.a
Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: Resolution Citizen of the Year 2021 (Resolution Congratulating Mark Thornton on Being Selected “Citizen of the Year” 2021) City
Council
Report
TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider the Application (PLN -2021-201) of Susan Chen for a Planned Development Permit to Allow the Constructi on of Four Single-Family Homes; a Tentative Subdivision Map to Allow the Creation of Five Lots (Four Residential and One Common Lot); and a Parking Modification Permit to Allow Two of the Required Assigned Parking Spaces (Unit Specific), to be Provided as Guest Parking Spaces on Property Located at 1323 Elam Avenue. This Application is Intended to Reinstate Previous Approvals for a Planned Development Permit (PLN2017 -101), Tentative Subdivision Map (PLN2017-102), and Parking Modification Permit (PLN2017 -338) Which Expired (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a Resolution approving a Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, and Parking Modification Permit for the construction of four single-family homes, t he creation of five lots (four single -family and one commonly owned lot), and two of the required assigned parking spaces to be provided as guest parking spaces for the property located at 1323 Elam Avenue.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Development proposals are subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as codified in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations . The level of review required under CEQA is generally commensurate with the scale and complexity of the proposed development. Minor projects, as identif ied in CEQA, may be deemed exempt from formal environmental review, if they will not result in any potential significant environmental impacts.
On February 6, 2018, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the previous project (reference Attachment D – Previous CEQA Documents) and approved an associated Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning of the property from R-M (Multiple-Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development). The project may now be found Categorically Exempt u nder Section 15332 (Class 32) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pertaining to In -Fill Development Projects which are found consistent with all applicable general plan policies and zoning regulations, are under five acres in size, and substantially surrounded by urban uses.
Item: 10
Category: PUBLIC HEARINGS AND
INTRODUCTION OF
ORDINANCES
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
10 Packet Pg. 202
1323 Elam Avenue Page 2 of 11
The project qualifies for the exemption on the basis the site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species (i.e., wetland), the project will not result in any significant effects related to traffic, noise, or air/water quality, and can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services as documented by the project materials and further substantiated by the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration. There are also no substantive changes to the project and/or changes to the surrounding area of the project since it was last approved. Accordingly, Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the Council find the project Categorically Exempt under CEQA.
PROJECT DATA
General Plan Land Use: Low-Medium Density Res. (6-13 units/gr. acre)
Existing Zoning: P-D (Planned Development)
Gross Lot Area: 20,027 square feet (including 2,250 sq. ft. of R.O.W.) Existing Net Lot Area: 18,152 square-feet
Proposed Net Lot Area:
Lot 1: 3,269 square feet
Lot 2: 2,556 square feet
Lot 3: 2,554 square feet
Lot 4: 2,578 square feet
Lot 5: 6,821 square feet (common lot; Lot “A”)
Total Net Lot Area: 17,778 square feet1
Proposed Density: 8.7 units/gr. acre (4 units / 0.459 gross acres) Maximum Density Allowed: 13.0 units/gr. acre
Building Height: 27 Feet (28-Feet max)
Parking:
Provided: 12 spaces (8 covered/8 assigned)
Required: 12 spaces (8 covered/10 assigned) 2
Surrounding Uses:
North: Apartment Community (R-2 Zoning)
South: Single-Family Residential (R-1-6 Zoning)
East: Single-Family Residential (R-M & P-D Zoning)
West: Single-Family Residential (P-D Zoning)
BACKGROUND
1 After 5-foot dedication.
2 The project is required 2 ½ parking spaces per unit, plus ½ space as guest parking. As the project would provide two of the required ‘assigned’ spaces as uncovered guest parking a parking modification permit is required. 10 Packet Pg. 203
1323 Elam Avenue Page 3 of 11
On February 6, 2018, the City Council unanimously adopted Ordinance 2229, and Resolutions 12278 -12281 approving the previous project. The permits were approved for two-years and expired February 6, 20203.
As the City does not have special procedures for the reinstatement of an expired permit, the applicant submitted new applications for reconsideration of the project. As the project is in substantial conformance with the original application (i.e., site and architectural design), and none of the sta ndards or codes have changed in such a manner to impact the project, staff expedited review of the project by holding the City’s Site and Architectural Review Committee (SARC) meeting and Planning Commission meeting on the same date, February 8, 2022.
On February 8, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the subject item. At the meeting, two members of the public spoke expressing concerns with illegal dumping and property maintenance (i.e., overgrown weeds), with one member also expressing design concerns (e.g., potential privacy impacts, setbacks, shading, neighborhood compatibility, number of off -street parking spaces) and reservations that the project would be completed in a timely manner. One of the speakers provided an email seeking confirmation from staff that a previous Condition of Approval requiring an 8-foot-tall fence between properties had been carried over to the prior approval and that the property would be accurately surveyed. Staff provided confirmation on both points at the Planning Commission meeting and in response to the email which was included as a Desk Item (reference Attachment E – Desk Item, February 8, 2022 ). After due consideration, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending the City Council approve the project as presented on a unanimous 7-0-0 decision.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project Location: The project site consists of a single parcel located on the north side of Elam Avenue between Inwood Drive and San Tomas Aquino Road. The 18,152 square foot (ne t area) lot is currently developed with one single -family residence that will be demolished as part of the proposed subdivision. Abutting land uses include single - family homes to the east and west, an apartment community to the north, and single - family homes across Elam Avenue to the south.
Applicant’s Proposal: The applicant’s request includes a Planned Development Permit for the approval of site configuration and architectural design for four two -story single- family homes, a Tentative Subdivision Map to create four single -family lots and one commonly owned lot, and a Parking Modification Permit to allow for two of the required assigned parking spaces to be provided as guest parking spaces.
ANALYSIS
3 While AB 1561 provided for an 18-month extension of housing entitlements that were in effect March 4, 2020, and set to expire prior to December 31, 2021, the approval was not in effect on March 4, 2020, having expired one - month previously, and therefore did not qualify for the extension. 10 Packet Pg. 204
1323 Elam Avenue Page 4 of 11
General Plan / Land Use : The Campbell General Plan repr esents the City’s long -term vision for the community and is intended to guide decision -making regarding the City’s physical and economic growth. In this regard, the General Plan provides policies applicable to land use and development and organizes the Cit y into a framework of distinct land use designations (i.e., commercial, residential, industrial, etc.), as codified by the General Plan Land Use Map.
The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Low to Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre). The proposed project would be developed at a density of 8.71 units per gross acre, which is within the density range allowed for the site.
STANDARDS & REGULATIONS
Zoning District: The project site is zoned P -D (Planned Development). The P-D zoning district allows for flexibility of site standards (lot coverage, floor area ratio, setbacks, etc.) when consistent with site characteristics, particularly related to the development’s design and provision of open space. Development within t he P-D Zoning District must also be consistent with the underlying General Plan Land Use designation as well as applicable General Plan goals, policies, and strategies.
San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan : The project is subject to review under the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan (STANP). This plan was created to ensure that new development would respect the neighborhood character and built environment. The project would comply with all applicable standards of the STANP, and the proposed colors, materials, and building forms (roof shapes etc.), as well was the standards specific to the “low -medium density” range of the project (see discussion on “Zoning District”) and would be compatible with the neighborhood (see discussion on “Site and Architectural Design and Neighborhood Compatibility”).
Housing Accountability Act: As a housing development project proposing more than one residential unit, the proposal may not be denied or conditioned to reduce its density under the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) unles s: 1) the proposal is found to be in violation of an objective general plan/zoning standard; or 2) the project will result in a specific adverse impact to public health and safety. While changes to the project may be requested to further applicable goals, policies and strategies – changes not based on objective standards must be limited to avoid rendering the project infeasible or reduce the number of units. As an example, while the decision -making body may not deny a project because of its proposed paint c olor, it still retains the authority to condition such a change. The decision -making body must consider if any recommended conditions of approval or modifications to the project are consistent with the HAA and may request clarification from staff where appropriate.
ANALYSIS
Considerations in Review of Applications
10 Packet Pg. 205
1323 Elam Avenue Page 5 of 11
In review of any Planned Development Permit application, the Zoning Code directs advisory and decision -making bodies to consider certain design and operational elements of the proposal in rendering a decision. The following identifies the compliance of the application with these considerations:
Planned Development Permit Considerations:
A. Considerations relating to site circulation, traffic congestion, and traffic safety:
The site has been designe d such that a single driveway would serve all four homes, promoting greater open space and fewer curb -cuts on the street. The driveway is wide enough to accommodate two -way onsite traffic and provides a fire truck - turnaround onsite that complies with stand ard specifications. With only four (4) units onsite, the project would generate peak hour trips well below the thresholds 4 to require a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) or to result in any appreciable impact to traffic congestion.
B. Considerations relating to landscaping:
The project site will remove and replace all onsite landscaping with water -efficient groundcover, shrubs, and trees. The applicant is proposing to plant seventeen (17) new trees as part of a comprehensive landscaping plan that would also incl ude a combination of new shrubs and groundcover. No trees are onsite or proposed to be removed.
C. Considerations relating to structure and site layout:
The project’s design is sensitive to the neighborhood in terms of height (two -stories, under 27 -feet tall ), massing (detached single -family homes with offset second - stories), and colors (earth tones; beige, grey, light brown). In terms of materials, the project has proposed a combination of board and batten (vertical and horizontal) and shingle (fiber cement) for siding, and composition shingle for roofing. The design includes covered porches, rafter tails, banding, and cross -gable/hip roof designs.
The entry way of ‘Unit 1’ is oriented toward the public street, so as not to ‘wall off’ the subdivision from the neighborhood. Each home has been designed so that the garage does not dominate the facade.
Findings for Approval
To grant a land use approval, the decision-making body must affirmatively establish that the project meets codified findings for approval. Fi ndings establish the evidentiary basis for a City's decision to grant or deny a land use permit and to impose conditions of
4 The Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines published by the Santa Clara County Transportation Autho rity do not require the preparation of a Transportation Impact Analysis for projects expected to generate fewer than 100 a.m. or p.m. peak hour trips.
10 Packet Pg. 206
1323 Elam Avenue Page 6 of 11
approval as necessary to establish the findings. 5 Different land use permit applications (e.g., Planned Development Permit, Parking Modification Permit, etc.) have different findings for approval. The following analysis identifies each of the applicable findings in italics and how the proposed project satisfies them.
Planned Development Permit Findings
A. The proposed development or uses clearly would result in a more desirable environment and use of land than would be possible under any other zoning district classification.
The project site is zoned P -D (Planned Development). The P -D zoning district allows for flexibility of site standards (lot coverage, floor area ratio, setbacks, etc.) when consistent with site characteristics, particularly related to the development’s design and provision of open space. Development within the P -D Zoning District must also be consistent with the applica ble General Plan land use designation, goals, policies, and strategies, area plan requirements, and design guidelines (the project site is not subject to an area plan or design guidelines).
As the P-D zoning district is the only zoning district that supports the creation of a private street as proposed by the project, which provides for the development of detached single -family homes which may be found compatible with the neighborhood, the P -D zoning classification may be found appropriate and the project consistent with its intended purpose.
B. The proposed development would be compatible with the general plan and will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area.
The General Plan Land Use Element provides policies which may be taken into consideration by the Planning Commission in its review of the land use appropriateness of the proposed project. These policies speak to the need to protect the integrity of established neighborhoods and be thoughtful in the site planning and design process as follows:
Policy LUT-3.1: Variety of Residential Densities: Provide land use categories for and maintenance of a variety of residential densities to offer existing and future residents of all income levels, age groups and special needs sufficient opportunities and
choices for locating in Campbell.
Policy LUT-5.2: Residential Neighborhoods: Maintain safe, attractive, pedestrian friendly residential neighborhoods with
identifiable centers and consistent development patterns and a range of public and private services.
5The following link provides a March 5, 2020 League of California Cities Planning Commissioner PowerPoin t presentation on findings: https://www.cacities.org/Resources-Documents/Education-and-Events-Section/Planners- Institute/2020-Session-Materials/How-to-Prepare-Findings-and-Conditions-of-Approval 10 Packet Pg. 207
1323 Elam Avenue Page 7 of 11
Strategy LUT-5.2a: Neighborhood Compatibility : Promote new residential development and substantial additions that are designed to maintain and support the existing character and
development pattern of the surrounding neighborhood,
especially in historic neighborhoods and neighborhoods with consistent design characteristics.
Policy LUT-7.2n: Consistency With Plans : Ensure that new development and substantial remodeling projects are consistent with Specific Plans, Area Plans, City Standard Details, and adopted
Streetscape Standards to create a cohesive design.
Strategy LUT-9.3e: Building Materials : Encourage the use of long -lasting, high quality building materials on all buildings to ensure the long - term quality of the built environment.
Strategy LUT-17.1b: Landscaping: Ensure that new developments provide new tree plantings, shrubs, greenery and other landscaping materials, and preserve existing trees and shrubs.
As the proposal is consistent with the low -medium density land use designation (see ‘Project Data’), and may be found to further the aforementioned policies, the development may be found compatible with the General Plan and to aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area.
C. The proposed development will not result in allowing more re sidential units than would be allowed by other residential zoning districts which are consistent with the general plan.
In context of the Housing Accountability Act, this finding is no longer relevant.
The proposal may not be denied or conditioned to redu ce its density under the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) unless: 1) the proposal is found to be in violation of an objective general plan/zoning standard; or 2) the project will result in a specific adverse impact to public health and safety.
This notwith standing, the project complies will all objective development standards and falls within the density ranged called for by the Low -Medium Density Residential land use designation (8.71 per gr. acre proposed; 6 -13 units per gr. acre allowed).
D. The proposed de velopment would not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the neighborhood or of the city as a whole.
The Planned Development Permit process facilitates review of potential impacts to health, safety, or welfare of the neighborhood and City at large. Conditions of Approval may be incorporated into the project Resolution (reference Attachment A ) to lessen potential or identified project impacts. The project complies with all applicable development standards and policies and no detrimental impacts to health, safety, or welfare have been identified that will not be addressed by the Conditions of Approval. 10 Packet Pg. 208
1323 Elam Avenue Page 8 of 11
Tentative Subdivision Map Findings:
A. The proposed map is consistent with the general plan, any applicable specific plan, any policy or guideline implementing the general plan, and all other applicable provisions of the Campbell Municipal Code.
The project may be found consistent with the Low -Medium Density Residential land use designation of the General Plan in that it serves to provide for reside ntial use at the planned for density, and standards of the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan and Planned Development zoning district. The project was duly noticed and processed in accordance with all other applicable provisions of the Campbell Municipal Code.
B. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development.
The project site is relatively flat requiring minimal grading to accommodate the type and density and housing development proposed and can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services as documented by the project materials and further substantiated by the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration.
C. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environment al damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
The site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species (i.e., wetland), the project will not result in any significant effects related to traffic, nois e, or air/water quality, as documented by the project materials and further substantiated by the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration.
D. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not cause serious public health problems.
There are no known issues with the design or layout of the subdivision (i.e., provides a two-way driveway with an onsite fire truck turnaround) or the type of improvements proposed that will cause serious public health problems.
E. The design of the subdivisio n or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision or that alternative easements for access will be provided, and that these will be substan tially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public.
As conditions of approval on the map, the City shall secure all easements and land dedications necessary to serve the property. The project will not conflict with easements acquired by the publi c at large nor shall it diminish any easements that may exist that have been acquired by the public at large for access through or for use of the property within the proposed subdivision.
10 Packet Pg. 209
1323 Elam Avenue Page 9 of 11
F. The design of the subdivision shall provide, to the extent feasibl e, for future passive and natural heating and cooling features in accordance with Government Code Section 66473.1.
In response to this finding, the Government Code provides two examples. Responses to each example are provided below.
• Examples of passive or natural heating opportunities in subdivision design, include design of lot size and configuration to permit orientation of a structure in an east-west alignment for southern exposure.
The project has been designed such that every unit has a south facing exposure and with more active living rooms and/or kitchens on a southern exposure. The rear patio of each uni t also provides for an unobstructed southern exposure (as opposed to being located on the north side of the building in shade), which also provides more opportunities for their use during the day, and for more days during the year.
• Examples of passive or natural cooling opportunities in subdivision design include design of lot size and configuration to permit orientation of a structure to take advantage of shade or prevailing breezes.
The project has been designed with adequate separation between units to take advantage of prevailing breezes and would provide seventeen (17) new trees onsite to serve the four units for shade.
G. Water will be available and sufficient to serve a proposed subdivision in accordance with Government Code Section 66473.7.
Not applicable. For the purposes of this finding, the term subdivision applies to residential developments of more than 500 dwelling units or a project that would account for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of the public water system’s existing service connections. The project, which includes only four units, is well below the threshold of significance to require such an evaluat ion and is therefore presumed to have available and adequate water service.
Parking Modification Permit Findings : Pursuant to Section 21.28.040 (Table 3) of the Campbell Municipal Code (CMC), small lot single -family dwellings are required to provide 2½ pa rking spaces per unit, 2 of which must be covered, plus ½ space designated for guest parking per unit. For the four units proposed, this equates to a parking requirement of 8 covered parking spaces with additional 2 spaces provided for units and two space s provided for guest parking spaces for a total of 12 required parking spaces. As proposed, the project provides 12 parking spaces (8 covered and 4 uncovered spaces) as summarized in the table below:
Covered/Assigned Uncovered/Assigned Uncovered/Guest Total Required 8 2 2 12
10 Packet Pg. 210
1323 Elam Avenue Page 10 of 11
Proposed 8 0 4 12
Difference N/A -2 +2 0
While the project provides 12 parking spaces where 12 parking spaces are required, the proposal technically requires review and approval of a Parking Modification Permit to allow fo r two assigned parking spaces (i.e., unit specific), to be provided as guest parking spaces instead. In consideration of the applicant’s request, the following findings must be affirmatively established:
A. Due to the unique nature and circumstances of the project, or special development features, the anticipated number of parking spaces necessary to serve the use or structure is less than that required by the applicable off -street parking standards and would be satisfied by the proposed number of parking spaces.
The project would provide the same number of parking spaces but allocate them in a way that would best serve the use. As each unit would still retain two dedicated parking spaces per unit, sharing the remaining spaces as unassigned ‘guest parking’ is anticipated to result in a more functional shared use of space.
B. Conditions of approval have been incorporated into the project to ensure the long-term adequacy of the provided off-street parking.
The driveway and guest parking spaces shall be constructed of durable permeable pavers as a condition of approval. The project shall require the formation of a Homeowners Association to ensure the long -term maintenance of buildings and property, including the off-street parking spaces.
C. Approval of the parking mo dification permit will further the purpose of Campbell Municipal Code Chapter 21.28 (Parking and Loading).
The purpose of Chapter 21.28 is to “…ensure that adequate off -street parking and loading spaces are provided for each type of land use in a manner th at will ensure their usefulness, support alternative transportation solutions, improve the urban form of the community and protect the public safety”. By allowing for uncovered spaces to be shared, available parking will be better shared among the units onsite which is safer and helps retain areas offsite for alternative transportation solutions and not vehicle parking which can detract from the “urban form of the community”.
SARC Review : The application was reviewed by the Site and Architectural Review Committee (SARC) at its meeting of February 8, 2022. The SARC was supportive of the project, recognizing the prior approval and support for its reinstatement, and commented that the site circulation/layout, unit orientation, design and density remain appropriate for the site and surrounding area.
FISCAL IMPACTS
10 Packet Pg. 211
1323 Elam Avenue Page 11 of 11
In addition to the entitlement application fees already paid, and permits fees required for building permit and off -site improvement review, the developer will contribute over $24,000 in Park Impact Fees. Once fully developed, the project is also expected to increase assessed valuation at the site and provide the City with enhanced property tax revenue.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve the proposed project subject to additional and/or modified Conditions of Approval.
2. Continue for further review.
3. Deny the proposed project.
Prepared by:
Stephen Rose, Senior Planner
Reviewed by:
Rob Eastwood, Community
Development Director
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue
b. Location Map
c. Project Plans
d. Prior CEQA Documents
e. Desk Item, February 8, 2022
10 Packet Pg. 212
RESOLUTION NO. _____________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMI T, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, AND PARKING
MODIFICATION PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FO UR SINGLE -FAMILY
HOMES, THE CREATION OF FIVE LOTS (FOUR SINGLE -FAMILY A ND ONE
COMMONLY OW NED LOT), AND TWO OF TH E REQUIRED A SSIGNED PARKING
SPACES TO BE PROVIDED AS GUEST PARKING SPACES ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1323 ELAM AVENUE (FILE NUMBER: PLN-2021-201)
After notification and public hearing, as spe cified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.
The City Council finds as follows with regard to the proposed project:
Environmental Finding
1. The project may be found Categoric ally Exempt under Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, pertaining to In -Fill Development Projects w hich are found consistent with all applicable general plan policies, zoning regulations, are under five acres in size, and substa ntially surrounded by urban uses. Further, the project qualifies for the exemption on the basis the site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species (i.e. , wetland), the pro ject will not result in any significant effects related to traffic, noise, or air/water quality, and can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.
Evidentiary Findings
1. The proposed project ("project") includes a Planned Development for the approval of site configuration and architectur al des ign for four two -story single -family homes, Tentative Subdivision Map to create four single -family lots and one commonly owned lot, and Parking Modification Permit to allow for two of the required assigned/uncovered parking spaces, to be provided as uncovered guest parking on property located at 1323 Elam Avenue.
2. The project site consists of a single parcel (18,152 sq. ft. net / 20,027 sq. ft. gross) located on t he north side of Elam Avenue between Inwood Drive and San Tomas Aquino Road.
3. The 18,152 square foot lot is currently developed with one single -family residence that will be demolished as part of the proposed subdivision.
4. Abutting land uses include singl e-family homes to the east and west, an apartment community to the north, and single-family homes across Elam Avenue to the south.
5. The proposed subdivision will require a 5-foot dedication along Elam Avenue, which will reduce the net lot area of the property from 18,152 square-feet to 17,778 square feet.
6. The project site is zoned P-D (Planned Development).
10.a
Packet Pg. 213
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) City Council Resolution No.
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Approving a Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, and Parking Mod.
7. The project site is designated Low -Medium Density Residential (6 -13 Units / Gr. Acre) as shown on the Campbell General Plan Map.
8. The proposed residential land use, at a density of 8.71 units/gr. acre, is consistent with the al lowable l and use and maximum density permitted by the Low -Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation.
9. The proposed Planned Development Permit may be approved concurrently, and subject to a Tentative Subdivision Map, and Parking Modification Permit.
10. The project would be consistent with the following General Plan policies and strategies:
Policy LUT-3.1: Variety of Residential Densities : Provide land use categ ories for and maintenance of a variety of residential densities to offer existing and f uture re sidents of all income levels, age groups and special needs sufficient opportunities and choices for locating in Campbell.
Policy LUT-5.2: Residential Neighborhoods: Maintain safe, attractive, pedestrian friendly residential neighborhoods with ident ifiable centers and consistent development patterns and a range of public and private services.
Strategy LUT-5.2a: Neighborhood Compatibility: Promote new residential development and substantial additions that are designed to maintain and support the exis ting cha racter and development pattern of the surrounding neighborhood, especially in historic neighborhoods and neighborhoods with consistent design
characteristics.
Strategy LUT-9.3e: Building Materials : Encourage the use of long -lasting, high quality building materials on all buildings to ensure the long -term quality of the built environment.
Strategy LUT-17.1b:Landscaping: Ensure that new developments provide new tree plantings, shrubs, greenery and other landscaping materials, and preserve existing trees and shrubs.
11. The project proposes four two-story detached single-family residences.
12. The project’s floor area ratio (inclusive of the common lot) is approximately 48%.
13. The project’s lot coverage (inclusive of the common lot) is approximately 31%.
14. The project’s maximum building height would be approximately 27-feet.
15. The proj ect proposes 12 parking spaces comprised of 8 covered /assigned and 4 uncovered/guest, where 1 2 parki ng spaces comprised of 8 covered/assigned, 2
10.a
Packet Pg. 214
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) City Council Resolution No.
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Approving a Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, and Parking Mod.
uncovered/assigned & 2 uncovered/guest are required which is allowed with the approval of a Parking Modification Permit.
16. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map will allow creation of privately held parcels for fee title ownershi p as well as a common parcel to be improved with a private roadway, guest parking spaces, fire truck access, and landscaping.
17. The Tentative Subdivision Map has been distributed to local agencies, including Pacific Gas and Electric, West Valley Sanitation District, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority and the Sa nta Clara Valley Water District. As of the writing of this staff report, none of these agenc ies raised any concerns about providing services to the proposed lots.
18. The provisions of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrict ions are necessary to ensure the long-term property maintenance and continued architectural integrity of the project.
19. The proj ect proposes 12 parking spaces compri sed of 8 covered /assigned and 4 uncovered/guest, where 12 parki ng spaces comprised of 8 covered /assigned, 2 uncovered/assigned & 2 un covered/guest are required which is allowed with the approval of a Parking Modification Permit.
20. The distribution of parking s paces by type results in a more functional shared use of space for the four units and a more consistent single -family residential look and feel than would otherwise be achieved by assigning additional spaces to each unit.
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the City Council further finds and concludes that:
Planned Development Permit Findings (CMC Sec. 21.12.030.H.6):
1. The proposed development will clearly result in a more desirable environmen t and use of the land than would be possible under any other zoning district classification;
2. The proposed development will be compatible with the General Plan of the City and will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area;
3. The proposed development will not result in allowing more residential units than would be allowed by other residential zoning districts, which are consistent with the General Plan designation of the property;
4. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the neighborhood or the City as a whole;
5. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the Conditions of Approval and the impacts of the project;
10.a
Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) City Council Resolution No.
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Approving a Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, and Parking Mod.
6. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fee s impos ed upon the project and the type of development project;
7. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment;
Tentative Subdivision Map (CMC Title 20 – Subdivision and Land Development)
8. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance of the City;
9. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map does not impair the balance between the housing needs of the region and the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources;
10. The design of the Tentative S ubdivision Map provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities;
11. The development and uses will be compatible with the General Plan of the City and will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area;
12. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality betw een the Conditions of Approval and the impacts of the project;
13. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and the type of development project;
Parking Modification Permit Findings (CMC Sec. 21.28.050.G):
14. Due to the unique nature and circumstances of the project, or special development features, th e anticipated number of parking spaces necessary to se rve the use or structure is less than that required by the applicable off -street parking standards, an d would be satisfied by the proposed number of parking spaces;
15. Conditions of approval have been incorporated into the project to ensure the long -term adequacy of the provided off-street parking;
16. Approval of the parking modification permit will further th e purpose of Campbell Municipal Code Chapter 21.28 (Parking and Loading);
17. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between th e Conditions of Approval and the impacts of the project;
Environmental Findings (CMC Sec. 21.38.050):
10.a
Packet Pg. 216
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) City Council Resolution No.
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Approving a Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, and Parking Mod.
18. The project is Categorically Exempt under Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pertaining to In-Fill Development Projects and under Section 15304 of CEQA, pertaining to alterations which do not involve the removal of healthy, mature, scenic trees;
19. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as c urrently presented and subject to the required Conditions of Approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment; and
20. There are no unusual circumstances that would prevent the project from qualifyi ng as Categorically Exempt per Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves a Planned Development Permit for the Project located at 1323 Elam Avenue , subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (attached Exhibit “A”).
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ________, 2022, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
APPROVED:
Paul Resnikoff, Mayor
ATTEST:
Dusty Christopherson, City Clerk
10.a
Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue)
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Project File Number: PLN-2021-201
Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division
1. Approved Project : Approval is granted for a Planned Development Perm it, Tentati ve Subdivision Map, and Parking Modification Permit for the construction of fo ur single - family homes, the creation of five lots (four single-family and one commonly owned lot), and two of the required assigned parking spaces to be provided as guest parking spaces on property located at 1323 Elam Avenue. The project shall substantially conform to the project plans dated November 5, 2021, except as may be modified by the Conditions of Approval herein.
2. Planning Final Required: Planning Division clearance is required prior to Building Permit final.
3. Permit Expiration: The project approval is valid for a period of two years from the date of final City Council approval (March 15, 2024). A building permit must be obtained within this two-year period, or the Planned Development Permit shall be void.
4. Tract Map: The Planned Development Permit approval is contingent upon recordation of the Tract Map to divide the subject property. The Tract Map shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building or grading permits.
5. Plan Revisions: Prior to building permit submittal, the project plans shall be up dated to reflect the following revisions:
a. A note indicating that the fence between adjoining properties shall be eight feet tall good neighbor fence (matching appearance/treatment on both sides) with a similar appearance similar to that of adjoining properties (vertical wood slat).
6. Indemnity: If determi ned necessary by the Community Development Director, the applicant shall enter into an agreement satisfactory to the City Attorney to indemnify and defend the C ity of Campbell, its officers, officials, employees, and agents from any and all actions, liabil ities, losses, and torts, including attorney’s fees arising out of or connected unto any challenge to the decisio n of the Ci ty Council on this application.
Such agreement shall be executed within the 30 days of the Community Development Director's decision to require it.
7. Water Efficient Landscape Standards : As a new construction project with a total project landscape area grea ter than 2,500 square feet , this pro ject is subject to the
10.a
Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Parking Modification Permit
updated California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). Thi s document is available at: http://www.cityofcampbell.com/DocumentCenter/View/176 or on th e Plann ing Division’s Zoning and Land Use webpage through www.cityofcampbell.com. The building permit application submittal shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable MWELO and landscaping requirements and shall include the following:
a. A Landscape Documentation Package prepared by an authorized and l icensed professional demonstrating compliance with the full MWELO requirements with the following required elements:
1) Project Information per Section 492.3.
2) Water Effic ient Landscape Worksheet per Section 492.4 (Appendix B of the MWELO).
i. Include the worksheet within the plan set AND
ii. Provide a separate 8.5x11 hard copy or pdf via email to the project planner.
3) Soil Mana gement Repo rt per Section 492.5 (unless signifi cant ma ss grading is planned, in which case the report shall be submitted prior to permit final).
4) Landscape Design Plan per Section 492.6.
5) Irrigation Design Plan per Section 492.7.
6) Grading Design Plan per Section 492.8.
Note that a Soil Management Report ( if not submitted as part of the Landscape Documentation Package) and Certificate of Completion w ill be required prior to permit final.
b. A completed Landscape Information Form.
c. A note on the Cover Sheet in minim um 1/2” hig h lettering stating “Planning Final Required. The new landscaping indicated on the plans must be installed prior to final inspection. Changes to the landscaping plan require Planning approval.”
8. Utility Boxes and Back -Flow Preventers : The appli cant shall submit a plan prior to installation of the underground PG&E utility (trans former) boxes and San Jose Water Company back -flow preventers, indicating the location and color/material of the boxes for approval by the Community Development Director. Utility boxes at a minimum will be painted/treated to match the predominant backdrop, and indicating that to the extent feasible that utilities will be placed in the driveway and/or in front of each unit (i.e. water meter boxes) to avoid a bank of meters f rom being p laced along Elam Avenue which may otherwise detract from the single-family look of the project and neighborhood.
9. Pad Certification : Following site grading and prior to preparation of individual building pad forms, the following improvements shall be certified by a licensed land surveyor and
10.a
Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Parking Modification Permit
reviewed by the Community Development Director to determine consistency with the approved plan (grade, pad and drainage).
10. Residential Address Identification : The applicant shall submit a detail sheet showing uniform residential address identification mat erial type and location on the buildin g wall for review and approval by the Community Development prior to the issuance of Building Permits. In order to obtain approval, numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a posit ion as to be plainly visible and legib le from the street or road fronting the property. Additionally, number material and color is required to contrast with their background.
11. Property Maintenance: The prope rty is to b e maintained free of any combustible trash, debris, and weeds until the ti me that actual construction commences. Any vacant existing structures shall be secured, by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed fr om the prop erty (California Fire Code, 2013 Edition).
12. Stormwater and Grading Require ments: The project shall comply with City stormwater and grading requirements (CMC Sec. 20.80.020, 21.16.100, and 14.02), as more specifically itemized in the Public Works Department Conditions of Approval for the Tentative Subdivision Map.
13. Construction Activity: The following standards shall apply to construction of the project:
• Construction Hours (CMC 18.04.052): Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of eight a.m. and five p.m. daily, Monday through Friday. Saturday hours of construction shall be nine a.m. and four p.m. There shall be no construction activity on Sundays or National Holidays.
• Construction Noise (CMC 18.04.052): No loud environmentally disruptive noise over fifty dbs., such as air compressors without mufflers, continuously running motors or generators, loud playing musical instruments or radios will be allowed during the authorized hours of construction, Monday through Saturday, where such noise may be a nuisance to adjacent residential neighbors. Such nuisances shall be discontinued.
• Contractor Contact Information Posting : The project site shall be posted with the name and contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to issuance of building permits.
14. Covenants, Codes and Restricti ons (CC&R’s): Prior to issuance of recordation of t he Tract Map, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City a copy of the draft CC&R’s which shall include the following:
10.a
Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Parking Modification Permit
a. Formation of a Homeowner’s Association to ensure the long -term maintenance of buildings and property.
b. Continued architectural controls to ensure the architectural integrity of the project. c. Definition of common areas to be maintained an d provision of maintenance for these areas.
d. Provision which shall define the rights of use, allowable landscape or open space improvements.
e. Provision of a funding mechanism to ensure maintenance and upkeep of common areas.
f. Provision to provide ongoing main tenance of the required private roadways, landscaping, and sound walls as necessary. Graffiti removal from sound walls and fences within a reasonable period of time.
g. Provision that requires ongoing maintenance of the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height.
h. Provision for regular monitoring and maintenance of the stormwater system, in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.
i. Provision for regular monitoring and maintenance of the priv ate sanitary system as described by the designing engineering, and as approved by the City Engineer. j. Provision for the a vailability of interior garage space for the parking of vehicles at all times.
k. Provision to prohibit the use of outside parking spaces f or storage purposes, including boats, trailers, and recreational vehicles.
l. Provision to prohibit vehicle washing, and vehicle repair and maintenance activities in the project site, including, but not limited to garages and common parking areas. m. Provision that requires that all landscaping, including but not limited infiltration plantings, be maintained as depicted on the final landscaping plan. n. Provision guaranteeing equal access to all common facilities and amenities by all residents (renters and homeowners) of the project.
o. Provisions guaranteeing m aintenance of the stormwater treatment facilities and the storm drain late ral connect ion to the City’s storm sewer system that includes the proposed site design measure using permeable pavers.
Recordation of CC&Rs will occur at time of Final Map recordation.
15. Compliance with Other Regulations: The applicant shall comply with other state, county, and city ordinances that pertain to the proposed project.
10.a
Packet Pg. 221
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Parking Modification Permit
16. Equal Access: As codified within the project's CC&Rs, the Home Owners Association shall maintain equal access to all common facilities and amenities for all residents (renters and homeowners) of the project.
17. Utility Boxes and Back -Flow Preventers : The applicant shall submit a plan prior to installation of the underground PG&E utility (transformer) boxes and San Jose Water Company back -flow preventers, indicating the location and color/material of the boxes for approval by the Community Development Director.
18. Pad Certificatio n: Following si te grading and prior to preparation of individual building pad forms, the following improvements shall be certified by a licensed land surveyo r and reviewed by the Community Development Director to determine consistency with the approved plan (grade, pad and drainage).
19. Property Maintenance: The property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris, and weeds until the time that ac tual constr uction commences. Any vacant existing structures shall be secured, by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property (California Fire Code, 2013 Edition).
20. Stormwater and Grading Requirements : The project shall comply with City stormwater and grading requir ements (CMC Sec. 20.80.020, 21.16.100, and 14.02), as more specifically itemized in the Public Works Department Conditions of Approval for the Tentative Subdivision Map.
21. Parking: Prior to occupa ncy, twelve residential parking spaces shall be provided , comprised of 8 covered/assigned spac es and 4 uncovered/guest parking spaces .
Uncovered parking spaces shall be adequately striped in the locations shown on the Project Plans, and employ signage to i ndicate ade quate signage to signify the total number and availabil ity to guests of all units a t all times , as well as wheel stops firmly secured to the ground, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development.
Building Division
22. Permits Required: A bu ilding permit application shall be required for each proposed 4 (4) new single-family residences . The building permit shall include Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical fees when such work is part of the permit.
23. Plan P reparation: This project requires plans pr epared under the direction and oversight of a California licensed Engineer or Architect. Plans submitted for building permits shall be “wet stamped” and signed by the qualifying professional person.
24. Construction Plans: The Conditions of Approval shall b e stated in full on the cover sheet of construction plans submitted for building permit.
10.a
Packet Pg. 222
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Parking Modification Permit
25. Size of Plans : The minimum size of construction plans submitted for building permits shall be 24 inches by 36 inches.
26. Soils Report : Two copies of a curr ent soils r eport, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations shall be submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be p repared by a licensed engineer specializing in soils mechanics.
27. Site Plan : Application for building permit shall include a competent site plan that identifies property and proposed structures with dimensions and elevations as appropriate. Site plan shal l also include site drainage deta ils. Elevation bench marks shall be called out at all locations that are identified as “natural grade” and those that are “finished grade” and intended for use to determine the height of the proposed structure.
28. Foundation Inspections: A pad certificate prepared by a lic ensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector upon foundation inspection.
This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and the building pa d elev ation and o n-site retaining wall locations and elevations are prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items:
a. pad elevation
b. finish floor elevation (first floor)
c. foundation corner locations
29. Special Inspections : When a special inspection is required by C.B.C. Chapter 17, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program t hat sha ll be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permits, in accordance with C.B.C Appendix 1, Section 106. Please obtain City of Campbell Special Inspection forms from the Building Inspection Division Counter.
30. Non-Point Source Pollution Con trol: The City of Campbell standard Santa Clara Valley Non-point Source Pollution Control Program specification sheet shall be part of plan submittal. The specification sheet (size 24” X 36”) is available at the Building Di vision service counter.
31. Approvals Requi red: The p roject requires the following agency approval prior to issuance of the building permit:
a. West Valley Sanitation District (378-2407)
b. Santa Clara County Fire Department (378-4010)
c. San Jose Water Company (408) 279-7900 (Customer Service) d. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Demolitions Only) e. School District:
10.a
Packet Pg. 223
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Parking Modification Permit
i. Campbell Union School District (378-3405)
ii. Campbell Union High School District (371-0960)
iii. Moreland School District (379-1370)
iv. Cambrian School District (377-2103)
Note: To determine your district, contact the offices identified above. Obtain the School District payment form from the City Building Division, after the Division has approved the building permit application.
32. P.G. & E. : The applicant i s advis ed to contact P.G. &E. as early a s possible in the approval process. Service installations, changes and/or relocations may require substantial scheduling time and can cause significant delays in the approval process.
The applicant should also consu lt with P.G. & E. concerning util ity eas ements, distribution pole locations and required conductor clearances.
33. California Green Building Code : This project is subject to the mandatory requirements for new residential structures (Chapter 4) under the Calif ornia G reen Building Code, 2013 edition.
34. Construction Fencing: This project shall be properly enclosed with construction fencing to prevent unauthorized access to the site during construction. The construction site shall be secured to prevent vandalism a nd/or theft during hours when no work is being done. All protected trees shall be fenced to prevent damage to root systems.
35. Build it Green : Applicant shall complete and submit a “Build it Green” inventory of the proposed new single family project prior to issuance of building permit.
36. Automatic Fire Spr inkler Systems : This project shall comply with Section R313 of the California Residential building Code 2013 edition, and be equipped with a complying Fire Sprinkler system.
37. Storm Water Requirements: Storm water run-off from impervious surface created by this permitted project shall be directed to vegetated areas on the project parcel. Storm water shall not drain onto neighboring parcels.
38. Title 24 Energy Compliance: California Title 24 Energy Compliance forms shall be blue- lined on the construction plans. 8½ X 11 calculations shall be submitted as well.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
39. Limited Review: Review is limited to acceptability of site access, water supply and may include specific additional requirements as they pe rtain to fire department operations and shall not be construed as a substitute for formal plan review to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Prior to performing any work, the applicant shall
10.a
Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Parking Modification Permit
make application to, and receive from, the Buil ding De partment all applicable construction permits.
40. Public Easement: The public easement between House #4 and the turnaround shall not be obstructed at any time. Addition clarification notes shall be added during building permit phrase.
41. Fire Sprinklers Required: (As noted on Sheet A -0.01) An automatic r esidential fire sprinkler system shall be installed in one - and two-family dwellings as follows: In all new one- and two -family dwellings and in existing one - and two -family dwellings when additions are m ade t hat increase the building area to mo re than 3,6 00 square feet.
Exception: A one-time addition to an existing building that does not total more than 1,000 square feet of building area. NOTE: The owner(s), occupant(s) and any contractor(s) or subcontractor(s) are responsible for consulting with the water purveyor of record in order to determine if any modification or upgrade of the existing water service is required. A State of California licensed (C -16) Fire Protection Contractor shall submit plans, calculations, a completed permit application and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. CRC Sec. 313.2 as adopted and amended by CBLMC. Sprinkler plans to be noted as a deferred submittal for each of the residential plan sets.
42. Fire Department (Eng ine) Driveway Turnaround Required : (As noted on Sheet A -1.11) Provide an approved fire department engine driveway turnaround with a minimum radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside. Installations shall conform w ith Fir e Department Standard Details and Specifications D-1. No parking shall occur within the turnaround.
Turnaround to be delineated with red curbing, striping or with signage in accordance with SCCFD A -6 Standard and incorporated with the “Fire Ap paratus (En gine) Access Roadway Required” comment below.
43. Fire Apparatus (Engine) Access Roadway Required : (As noted on Sheet 5) Provide an access roadway with a paved all -weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 42 feet outside, and a maximum slope of 15%. Surface shall be capable of supporting 75K pounds. Installations shall conform to Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications Sheet A-1. CFC Sec. 503.
44. Construction Site Fire Safety : (As noted on Sh eet A -0.01) All construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of the CFC Chapter 33 and our Standard Detail and Specification S1 -7. Provide appropriate notations on subsequent plan submittals, as appropriate to the project. CFC Chp. 33.
45. Address Identification: (As noted on Sheet A -0.01) New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visi ble from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Where required by the fire
10.a
Packet Pg. 225
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Parking Modification Permit
code official, address numbers shall be provided in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Address nu mbers s hall be Arabic numbers or alphabetical letters. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches (101.6 mm) high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inch (12.7 mm). Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public wa y, a monument, pole or other sign or mean s shall be used to identify the structure. Address numbers shall be maintained. CFC Sec. 505.1.
46. Water Supply Requirements : (As noted on Sheet A -0.01) Potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination cau sed by fire protection w ater supplies. It is the responsibility of the applicant and any contractors and subcontractors to contact the water purveyor supplying the site of such project, and to comply with the requirements of that purveyor. Such requirement s shall be incorporated into the design o f any water - based fire protection systems, and/or fire suppression water supply systems or storage containers that may be physically connected in any manner to an appliance capable of causing contamination of the po table w ater supply of th e purveyor of rec ord. Final approval of the system(s) under consideration will not be granted by this office until compliance with the requirements of the water purveyor of record are documented by that purveyor as having been met b y the a pplicant(s). 2019 CFC Sec. 903.3.5 and Health and Safety Code 13114.7.
47. Violation of Fire Code : This review shall not be construed to be an approval of a violation of the provisions of the California Fire Code or of other laws or regulations of the jurisdiction. A permit presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of the fire code or other such laws or regulations shall not be valid. Any addition to or alteration of approved construction documents shall be approved in advance. [ CFC, Ch.1, 105.3.6]
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
48. Construction Drawings: The applicant shall submit the require d Tract Map, St reet Improvement Plans, and Grading and Drainage Plans directly to the Public Works Department prior to, or concurrent with the Building permit application. Said application shall include the following:
a. Response Letter: Upon submittal of t he required pl ans, the applicant shall provide an itemized response letter verifying that all the Public Works Conditions of Approval have been met or addressed.
b. Submittal Requirements: The checklis t for the various plans required for submittal can be found on the City’s Website at:
CityServices►PublicWorks►Engineering►Land Development►Documents, (or use this link: http://www.cityofcampbell.com/206/Documents). See instructions on:
i. Checklist for Tract Map;
10.a
Packet Pg. 226
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Parking Modification Permit
ii. Checklist for Grading and Drainage;
iii. Checklist for Street Improvement Plans;
iv. Upon submittal of the Final Map, a joint trench plan is required (location of the electrical power pole and all utility boxes will not be allowed in the sidewalk area).
49. Final Map : Prior to issuance of any gra ding or building permits for the project, the applicant shall submit a Final Map for review by the City and recordation, upon approval by the City Council, pa y various fees/deposits and submit the map in a digital f ormat acceptable to the City. See instruc tions on “Checklist for Tract Maps” on the City’s website.
50. Preliminary Title Report: Upon submittal of the Final Map, the applicant shall provide a current (within the past 6 months) Preliminary Title Report.
51. Right-of-Way for Public Street Purposes: Upon r ecordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall fully complete the process to cause additional right -of-way to be granted in fee for public st reet purposes along the Elam Avenue frontage to accommodate a 30 - ft half street in fee, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall submit the necessary documents for approval by the City Engineer process the submittal with City sta ff’s commen ts and fully complete the right -of-way process. The applicant shall cause all documents to be prepared by a registered civil engineer/land surveyor, as necessary, for the City’s review and recordation.
52. Public Service Easement: Upon recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall grant a 5-ft Public Service Easement o n private property contiguous with th e public right-of-way along the Elam Avenue frontage, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall cause all documents t o be prepar ed by a registered civil engineer/land surveyor, as necessary, for the City’s review and recordation. Private utilities such as the PG&E joint trench shall be located so as not to interfere with the future public street trees root system.
53. Private Easements: Upon recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall cause pr ivate easements to be recorded for p rivate utilities, private storm drains, reciprocal ingress and egress, emergency vehicles, etc.
54. Monumentation for Final Map: Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall provide a cash deposit (100% of t he monument estimate ) for setting a ll monuments shown on the map. Monuments shall be set per section 20.76.010 of the Campbell Municipal Code including but not limited to setting permanent pipe monuments (three - fourths inch galvanized steel pipe t wo feet long approximately six inches below finished grade) at each boundary of all lot corners within the subdivision (a total of 14 boundary points), along the exterior boundary lines a t intervals of approximately five hundred feet
10.a
Packet Pg. 227
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Parking Modification Permit
and at all beginning o f curves and ending of curves on property li nes, and monument boxes (Quantity 2) at intersections of all street monument line tangents.
55. Demolition: Prior to recording of the Final Map t he applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and remove any nonconforming structures.
56. Soils Report: Upon submi ttal of the Final Map, applicant shall provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer.
57. Grading and Drainage Pl an: Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten -year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits.
Prior to occupancy, t he design e ngineer shall provide written certification that the development has been built per the engineered grading and drainage plans. a. Grading plans must also include side and rear yard topography extending a sufficient distance beyond property line (20 ’ minimum) to determine that proposed grading will not impede existing drainage patterns.
b. Identify the location o f overland release to the public storm system/public right of way.
58. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall pay the required Storm Drain Area fee.
59. Park Impact Fee: A park imp act fee is due upon development of the site, based on the development density ranging from 6 < 13 Units per Gross Acre (Low/Medium Density), less credit for one legally constructed u nit. Prior to recordation of the Tract Map, 75% of this fee is due. The r emaining 25% is due prior to issuance of a certificate of building occupancy. This fee is subject to change and the fee in effect at the time of payment shall be the fee due.
60. Stormwater Polluti on Prevention Measures : Pr ior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara Valley Water District requirements, and the Campbe ll Municipal Code regarding s tormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff to the bay.
Resources to achieve these objectives include Stormwater Best Management Pra ctices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment (“CA BMP Handbook”) by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection (“Start at the Source”) by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Assoc iation (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwa ter Quality: A
10.a
Packet Pg. 228
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Parking Modification Permit
Companion Document to Start at the Source (“Using Site Design Techniques”) by BASMAA, 2003.
61. Utilities: All on-site utilities shall be installe d underground per Section 21.18.140 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buil dings or additions. Applicant shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companies.
Utility locations shall not cause damage to any existing street trees. Where there are utility conflicts due to establi shed tree roots or where a new tree will be installed, alternate locations for utilities shall be explored. Include ut ility trenc h details where necessary.
62. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Proposed water meter(s) and sewer cleanout(s) shall be re located or installed on private property behind the public right -of- way line.
63. Utility Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engi neer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. The plan shall clearly show the location and size of all exi sting utilities and the associated main lin es; indicate which utilities and services are to remain; which utilities and services are to b e abandoned, and where new utilities and services will be installed. Joint trenches for new utilities shall be used whenever possible.
64. Joint Trench Plan: Upon sub mittal of the Final Map, a joint trench plan is required showing the location of the electric al power pole and all utility boxes associated with it.
No utility boxes will be allowed in the sidewalk area. All vau lts, boxes transformers must be undergrounded. No above ground equipment shall be installed.
65. Pavement Restoration: Based on the utilit y coordination plan, the applicant shall prepare a pavement restoration plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment. Str eets that have been reconstructed or overlaid within the previous five years will require bo ring and jacking for all new utility installations Elam Avenue has not been reconstructed or overlaid in the last 5 yea rs. The pav ement restoration plan shall indic ate how the street pavement shall be restored following the installation or abandonment of all utilities necessary for the project.
66. Street Improvement Agreements / Plans / Encroachment Permit / Fees / Deposits: Prior to r ecordation of the Final Map, the ap plicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improve ments to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit fo r construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer . The plans shall include the following, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer:
10.a
Packet Pg. 229
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Parking Modification Permit
c. Show location of all existing utilities within the new and existing public right of way.
d. Relocation of all existing utilities including utility boxes, covers, poles, etc. outside of sidewalk area. No utility boxes, covers, etc. will be allowed in the sidewalk area. Place all new utili ty equipmen t, boxes, covers, poles serving the development, in Lot “A” (Common Area).
e. Removal of existing street section to crown of Elam Avenue roadway. f. Installation of City approved street trees and irrigation at 30 feet on center. Park strip ground cover shall be no mow (fine fescue and hair grass Deschampsia) turf. g. Installation of City standard curb, gutter, 5ft park strip and 4ft -6in sidewalk and an ADA compliant driveway approach per Detail D-16.1, Multi-Residential Driveway. h. Installation of enginee red structu ral pavement section to centerline, as required by the City Engineer.
i. Installation of asphalt concrete overlay per street pav ement restoration plan for utility installation and/or abandonment, as required by the City Engineer. j. A Type 15 Caltra ns (LED) St reet Light to be installed along th e Elam Avenue frontage (a photometric plan will be required at the time of construction pla n review to determine exact location of the street light). k. Installation of streetlights, conduits, conductors and relat ed faciliti es in accordance with the City of Campbell’s Street Lighting Policies. l. Installation of traffic control, stripes and signs.
m. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary.
n. Submit final plans in a digital format acceptable to the City.
67. Street Improvements C ompleted for Occupancy and Building Permit Final: Prior to allowing occupancy and/or fina l building permit signoff for any and/or all buildings, the applicant shall have the required street improvements and p avement res toration installed and accepted by t he City, and the design engineer shall submit as -built drawings to the City.
68. Maintenance of Landscaping: Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manne r that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height.
69. Utility Encroachment Permit: Separate encroachment permits for the in stallation of utilities to serve the d evelopment will be required (including water, sewer, gas, electric, etc.). Applicant sh all apply for and pay all necessary fees for utility permits for sanitary sewer, gas, water, electric and all other utility work.
10.a
Packet Pg. 230
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Parking Modification Permit
70. Additional Street Improvements: Should it be discovered after the approval process that new utility main lines, extra utilit y work or other work is required to service the development, and should those facilities or other work affect any publi c improvements, the City may add conditions to the development/project/permit, at the discretion of the City Engineer, to restore pavemen t or other public improvements to the satisfaction of the City.
71. Other Design Comments that will be required during the full design process:
o. This project is not a C.3 Reg ulated project because the applicant is proposing to reduce the impervious surfaces by installing permeable pavers and has demonstrated that the total impervious areas are less than 10,000 square feet.
The type of pe rmeable pavers used must meet the C.3 St ormwater Handbook Design Guidelines by SCVURPPP, Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollu tion Prevention Program.
p. The applicant must provide observation well(s) to help facilitate periodic inspections on the installation of permeable pavers. The observation well(s) will be required to be installed in or outside the permeable pavement area. T he observation well(s) should be located at the lowest elevation. q. The City has reservations on the proposal of the overall design of the driveway (site design measure to reduce impervious surfaces on the project) and therefore will review this mixed material method of pervious and non-pervious sections in depth at the time of project submittal. The civil engineer will be required to provide more information on how this system will work in unison and demonstrate that it meets the C.3 intent, and provide a maintenance plan relating to this design.
r. The City will not allow a connection to the back of the public storm drain in let from an on-site junction box as shown on the pl ans. A connection will be required to the public storm main system. During construct ion design review, a profile detail will also be required. Connection to the City’s Storm Drain systems requires minimum 12” RCP p ipe from an on -site junction box to the storm drain main system. Add a note identifying this lateral connection is privately o wned and therefore maintenance is part of the HOA. A storm drain manhole in the public right of way will be required at interception. The profile information must have th e existing storm manhole inverts.
s. Parking areas adjacent to the buildings and foundation areas shall not be made of pervious pavement. Replace any pervious areas with impervious material and drain away from the buildings. Pervious areas adjacent to all bu ildings shall slope away at 5% for at least 10-ft.
t. Impervious areas in the drive isl e may need to be reduced to offset the replaced
10.a
Packet Pg. 231
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
PLN-2021-201 – 1323 Elam Avenue
Planned Development Permit, Tentative Subdivision Map, Parking Modification Permit
permeable pavement in the parking areas.
u. Water meter BFPs, undergroun d transformers/vaults (no above ground) must be placed on private property; the location should be coordinated between the Fire Dept. and the Planning Dept.
v. The City will allow for the current stormwater design scenario to connect to the City Storm Drai n System; h owever a soils report should include tes ts showing infiltration rates so that if the soils are good, the City will require red esign to infiltrate into the soil instead.
w. All topsoil adjacent to the permeable pavers must be below the flush curb (minimum 6’’) so that top soil does not sheet flow over into the permeable pavers. x. All perimeter walls acting as a retainer shall be made using masonry or concrete.
10.a
Packet Pg. 232
Attachment: CC Resolution with Exhibit A- 1323 Elam Avenue (1323 Elam Avenue) 47 This map is based on GIS Information and reflects the most current information at the time of this printing. The map is intended for reference purposes only and the City and its staff is not responsible for errors. 1323 Elam Avenue - Location Map
564Campbell IT, GIS Services
94 1:
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere
Feet
940
Scale
10.b
Packet Pg. 233
Attachment: Location Map (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 234
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 236
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 237
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 242
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 243
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 247
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 248
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 249
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 250
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS
EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT
JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE PLAN
JOINT TRENCH SECTIONS AND DETAILS
JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE TITLE SHEET
JOINT TRENCH GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILS
SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION
JOINT TRENCH DETAILS
21 - 22
20 17
18 19
4NEW FULL SERVICE COMPLETIONS (ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND CATV) SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.
560 L.F. OF JOINT TRENCH SHALL BE INSTALLED
WITH THIS JOINT TRENCH PLAN SET
EX GAS
JT
SVC
EEUG
ETOH
GAS
EUOH
DESCRIPTION:BY:DATE:STATUS:
A = APPROVEDxANS= APPROVED NOT SIGNEDxNA= NOT APPROVEDxF= FIRST SUBMITTALxSS= SECOND SUBMITTALxR= RECEIVED
ELAM AVENUE
CROCKETT AVENUE
SOUTH SAN THOMAS AQUINO ROAD
HARRIET DRIVE
CROCKETT AVENUE
WESTMONT ELAM AVENUE
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL
HAIDER KAMMOONAH
QUALIFIED APPLICANT DESIGN ENGINEER
ANTHONY RICE (916) 760-3658
E - PM# 35148762 / G - PM# 35148344
ANTHONY RICE3/31/2020
HOWARD PROCK
BENJAMIN LOPEZ
10/22/2020
10/28/2020
JAN WEXNER
17 24
10.c
Packet Pg. 251
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
18 24
10.c
Packet Pg. 252
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
19 24
10.c
Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
SECTION MSECTION M6SECTION P
SECTION T
SECTION S
SECTION U
20 24
10.c
Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS
EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS
EX WT EX WT EX WT
EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT WT
WT
WTWT
SS
SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD SD
SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD SD
SD SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD SD
SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SDSDSD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SDSD
EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
SS
SS
SS
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJT
GAS
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT JT JT
TUG
TUG
TUG
TUG
TUG
TUG
GAS
GAS
EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GASEX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS
EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOHEUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH
EUOHEUOHEUOH OHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOH
MATCHLINE MATCHLINE
21 24
10.c
Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJT
EUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOH EUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOH
MATCHLINE MATCHLINE
22 24
10.c
Packet Pg. 256
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
731 SF
OPEN SPACE 624 SF
OPEN SPACE
788 SF
OPEN SPACE
PORCH (73 SF)PORCH (73 SF)
PORCH (152 SF)
24" X 24" STEPSTONE PAVERS
W/ DYMONDIA BETWEEN
UNITS
(2) 24" BOX
QUERCUS SUBER
ADJACENT BUILDING
APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING
APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING
APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING
APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING
APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDINGAPP. LOCATION
ROSMARINUS O. 'BLUE
SPIRES' PRIVACY HEDGE
PROPERTY LINE
(1) 15 GAL. LAGERSTROEMIA
'NATCHEZ'
731 SF
OPEN SPACE
(1) 15 GAL. MAGNOLIA
GRANDIFLORA 'ST. MARY'
(N) PROPERTY LINE POST DEDICATION
± 5' ROW TO BE DEDICATED IN FEE
AGAPANTHUS ORIENTALIS
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
HOUSE 2 HOUSE 1HOUSE 3
18'X20' GARAGE
(2 CAR)
18'X20' GARAGE
(2 CAR)
18'X20' GARAGE
(2 CAR)
(E) UTILITY EASEMENT
(N) CITY DEDICATION
MULCH
(N) PUBLIC SERVICE
EASEMENT
12"X12" PERVIOUS PAVERS
BY PACIFIC INTERLOCK
PAVINGSTONE INC.
6"X12" PERVIOUS PAVERS BY
PACIFIC INTERLOCK
PAVINGSTONE INC.
CIP CONCRETE PAVEMENT
(2) 24" BOX
QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA
NATURAL FORM
LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA
15' SETBACK
15' SETBACK
(E) PROPERTY LINE
15' SETBACK
PROPOSED LOCATION OF (4)
MAIL BOXES
DISTICTIS BUCCINATORIA
VINE ON FENCE
DISTICTIS BUCCINATORIA
VINE ON FENCE
(3) CALANDRINIA GRANDIFLORA
(1) 15 GAL. CERCIS CANADIENSIS
'FOREST PANSY'
(1) 15 GAL. MAGNOLIA
GRANDIFLORA 'ST. MARY'
PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA
PRIVACY HEDGE
(1) 15 GAL. CERCIS
C. 'FOREST PANSY'
(2) 15 GAL. TRISTANIA LAURINA
(3) 15 GAL. PODOCARPUS
(1) 15 GAL. MAGNOLIA
GRANDIFLORA 'ST. MARY'
(2) 15 GAL. CERCIS
C.
'FOREST PANSY'
PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA
PRIVACY HEDGE
(1) 15 GAL. MAGNOLIA
GRANDIFLORA 'ST. MARY'
(2) 15 GAL. TRISTANIA LAURINA
(3) 15 GAL. PODOCARPUS
PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA
PRIVACY HEDGE
(4) 15 GAL. ARBUTUS
UNEDO
(1) 15 GAL. TRISTANIA LAURINA
OPEN
SPACE
MULCH
POROUS GRASS PAVER WITH
DYMONDIA GROUNDCOVER
POROUS GRASS PAVER WITH
DYMONDIA GROUNDCOVER
POROUS GRASS PAVER
WITH DYMONDIA
GROUNDCOVER
PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF) PORCH (102 SF) HOUSE 4
18'x20' GARAGE
(2 CAR)
PORCH (133 SF)
GUEST
PARKING
(3) AGAVA ATTENUATA
MULCH MULCH
MULCH
MULCH
(3) AGAVA ATTENUATA
(1) 15 GAL. LAGERSTROEMIA
'NATCHEZ'
(7) CALANDRINIA GRANDIFLORA
(1) 15 GAL. TRISTANIA LAURINA
1323 ELAM AVE.
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
RESIDENCE
YANHUA
1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008
Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E
REVISIONS:
12.20.18 BUILDING SUBMITTAL
PROJECT NO:
DRAFTED BY:REY MAPALO
DATE:
23 1PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
SCALE: 3/32 " = 1'-0"
ON-SITE
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
23 OF 24
SHEET:
10.c
Packet Pg. 257
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF) PORCH (102 SF) HOUSE 2 HOUSE 1HOUSE 3HOUSE 4
BACKFLOW PREVENTER PER
STANDARD DETAIL BKーRPP
INSTALL (1)-1" WATER
SERVICE PER DISTRICT
STANDARDS
$'-$&E17 %U,/',1*
$33 /O&$7,O1
$'-$&E17 %U,/',1*
$33 /O&$7,O1
$'-$&E17 %U,/',1*
$33 /O&$7,O1
$'-$&E17 %U,/',1*
$33 /O&$7,O1
$'-$&E17 %U,/',1*$33 /O&$7,O1
35O3E57< /,1E
HOUSE 2 HOUSE 1HOUSE 3HOUSE 4
E
U7,/,7< E$SE0E17
1 &,7< 'E',&$7,O1
E
35O3E57< /,1E
1323 ELAM AVE.
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
RESIDENCE
YANHUA
1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008
Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E
REVISIONS:
12.20.18 BUILDING SUBMITTAL
PROJECT NO:
DRAFTED BY:REY MAPALO
DATE:
24 ON-SITE
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
2PROPOSED HYDROZONE PLAN
SCALE: 116 " = 1'-0"
1PROPOSED IRRIGATION PLAN
SCALE: 116 " = 1'-0"
24 OF 24
SHEET:
10.c
Packet Pg. 258
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 259
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 260
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 261
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 262
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 263
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.c
Packet Pg. 264
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS
EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT
JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE PLAN
JOINT TRENCH SECTIONS AND DETAILS
JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE TITLE SHEET
JOINT TRENCH GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILS
SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION
JOINT TRENCH DETAILS
11 - 12
10 7
8 9
4NEW FULL SERVICE COMPLETIONS (ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND CATV) SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.
560 L.F. OF JOINT TRENCH SHALL BE INSTALLED
WITH THIS JOINT TRENCH PLAN SET
EX GAS
JT
SVC
EEUG
ETOH
GAS
EUOH
DESCRIPTION:BY:DATE:STATUS:
A = APPROVEDxANS= APPROVED NOT SIGNEDxNA= NOT APPROVEDxF= FIRST SUBMITTALxSS= SECOND SUBMITTALxR= RECEIVED
ELAM AVENUE
CROCKETT AVENUE
SOUTH SAN THOMAS AQUINO ROAD
HARRIET DRIVE
CROCKETT AVENUE
WESTMONT ELAM AVENUE
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL
HAIDER KAMMOONAH
QUALIFIED APPLICANT DESIGN ENGINEER
ANTHONY RICE (916) 760-3658
E - PM# 35148762 / G - PM# 35148344
ANTHONY RICE3/31/2020
HOWARD PROCK
BENJAMIN LOPEZ
10/22/2020
10/28/2020
JAN WEXNER
7 17
12/11/2020
STREET LIGHTING SITE PLAN
STREET LIGHTING GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILS
15 13 - 14
10.c
Packet Pg. 265
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
8 17
10.c
Packet Pg. 266
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
9 17
10.c
Packet Pg. 267
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
SECTION MSECTION M6SECTION P
SECTION T
SECTION S
SECTION U
10 17
10.c
Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS
EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS WT
WT
WTWT
SS
SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD SD
SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD SD
SD SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD SD
SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SDSDSD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SDSD
EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
SS
SS
SS SD
SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD SD SD SD SD SD
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJT
GAS
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT JT JT
TUG
TUG
TUG
TUG
TUG
TUG
GAS
GAS
EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GASEX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS
EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOHEUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH
EUOHEUOHEUOH OHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOH
MATCHLINE MATCHLINE
11 17
10.c
Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJT
EUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOH EUOHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOH
MATCHLINE MATCHLINE
12 17
10.c
Packet Pg. 270
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
ESL
SL
13 17
10.c
Packet Pg. 271
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
14 17
10.c
Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS
EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS
EX WT EX WT EX WT
EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT WT
WT
WTWT
SS
SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD SD
SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD SD
SD SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS EX SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD SD
SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SDSDSD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SDSD
EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT EX WT WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
WT
SS
SS
SS SD
SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD SD SD SD SD SD
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
SVC
JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJT
GAS
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT JT JT
TUG
TUG
TUG
TUG
TUG
TUG
GAS
GAS
EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GASEX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS
EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOHEUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH EUOH
EUOHEUOHEUOH OHEUOHEUOHEUOHEUOH
15 17
10.c
Packet Pg. 273
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
731 SF
OPEN SPACE 624 SF
OPEN SPACE
788 SF
OPEN SPACE
PORCH (73 SF)PORCH (73 SF)
PORCH (152 SF)
24" X 24" STEPSTONE
PAVERS W/ DYMONDIA
BETWEEN UNITS
ADJACENT BUILDING
APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING
APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING
APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING
APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING
APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDINGAPP. LOCATION
ROSMARINUS O. 'BLUE
SPIRES' PRIVACY HEDGE
PROPERTY LINE
(1) 15 GAL. LAGERSTROEMIA
'NATCHEZ'
731 SF
OPEN SPACE
(1) 15 GAL. MAGNOLIA
GRANDIFLORA 'ST. MARY'
(N) PROPERTY LINE POST DEDICATION
± 5' ROW TO BE DEDICATED IN FEE
AGAPANTHUS ORIENTALIS
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
HOUSE 2 HOUSE 1HOUSE 3
18'X20' GARAGE
(2 CAR)
18'X20' GARAGE
(2 CAR)
18'X20' GARAGE
(2 CAR)
(E) UTILITY EASEMENT
(N) CITY DEDICATION
MULCH
(N) PUBLIC SERVICE
EASEMENT
12"X12" PERVIOUS PAVERS
BY PACIFIC INTERLOCK
PAVINGSTONE INC.
6"X12" PERVIOUS PAVERS BY
PACIFIC INTERLOCK
PAVINGSTONE INC.
CIP CONCRETE PAVEMENT
(2)24" BOX
QUERCUS
SUBER"CORK OAK"
LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA
(2)24" BOX
QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA
NATURAL FORM
15' SETBACK
15' SETBACK
(E) PROPERTY LINE
15' SETBACK
PROPOSED LOCATION OF (4)
MAIL BOXES
DISTICTIS BUCCINATORIA
VINE ON FENCE
DISTICTIS BUCCINATORIA
VINE ON FENCE
(3) CALANDRINIA GRANDIFLORA
(1) 15 GAL. CERCIS CANADIENSIS
'FOREST PANSY'
(1) 15 GAL. MAGNOLIA
GRANDIFLORA 'ST. MARY'
PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA
PRIVACY HEDGE
(1) 15 GAL. CERCIS
C. 'FOREST PANSY'
(2) 15 GAL. TRISTANIA LAURINA
(3) 15 GAL. PODOCARPUS
(1) 15 GAL. MAGNOLIA
GRANDIFLORA 'ST. MARY'
(2) 15 GAL. CERCIS
C. 'FOREST PANSY'
PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA
PRIVACY HEDGE
(1) 15 GAL. MAGNOLIA
GRANDIFLORA 'ST. MARY'
(2) 15 GAL. TRISTANIA LAURINA
(3) 15 GAL. PODOCARPUS
PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA
PRIVACY HEDGE
(4) 15 GAL. ARBUTUS
UNEDO
(1) 15 GAL. TRISTANIA LAURINA
OPEN
SPACE
MULCH
POROUS GRASS PAVER WITH
DYMONDIA GROUNDCOVER
POROUS GRASS PAVER WITH
DYMONDIA GROUNDCOVER
POROUS GRASS PAVER
WITH DYMONDIA
GROUNDCOVER
PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF) PORCH (102 SF) HOUSE 4
18'x20' GARAGE
(2 CAR)
PORCH (133 SF)
GUEST
PARKING
(3) AGAVA ATTENUATA
MULCH MULCH
MULCH
MULCH
(3) AGAVA ATTENUATA
(1) 15 GAL. LAGERSTROEMIA
'NATCHEZ'
(7) CALANDRINIA GRANDIFLORA
(1) 15 GAL. TRISTANIA LAURINA
1323 ELAM AVE.
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
RESIDENCE
YANHUA
1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008
Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E
REVISIONS:
12.20.18 BUILDING SUBMITTAL
08-13-21 PLAN CHECK COMMENTS
PROJECT NO:
DRAFTED BY:REY MAPALO
DATE:
16 1PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
SCALE: 332 1
-0
OFF-SITE
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
16 OF 17
SHEET:
All on-site landscaping to be per approved on-site
improvement permit BLD2019-00823
10.c
Packet Pg. 274
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF) PORCH (102 SF) HOUSE 2 HOUSE 1HOUSE 3HOUSE 4
BACKFLOW PREVENTER PER
STANDARD DETAIL BKーRPP
INSTALL (1)-1" WATER
SERVICE PER DISTRICT
STANDARDS
ADJACENT BUILDING
APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING
APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING
APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING
APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDINGAPP. LOCATION
PROPERTY LINE
HOUSE 2 HOUSE 1HOUSE 3HOUSE 4
(E) UTILITY EASEMENT
(N) CITY DEDICATION
(E) PROPERTY LINE
1323 ELAM AVE.
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
RESIDENCE
YANHUA
1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008
Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E
REVISIONS:
12.20.18 BUILDING SUBMITTAL
08-13-21 PLAN CHECK COMMENTS
PROJECT NO:
DRAFTED BY:REY MAPALO
DATE:
17 OFF-SITE
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
2PROPOSED HYDRO=ONE PLAN
SCALE: 116 1
-0
1PROPOSED IRRI*ATION PLAN
SCALE: 116 1
-0
17 OF 17
SHEET:
All on-site landscaping to be per approved on-site
improvement permit BLD2019-00823
10.c
Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
X XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
X
XXXX XXXX
X XXXX
15'-0"PL SETBACK
HOUSE 1
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)
PORCH (121 SF)
HOUSE 218'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 3
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 418'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)
25'-6"GARAGE TO PL (TYP)
624 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE788 SF OPEN SPACE 23'-11 1/2"BLDG TO PL (TYP)1'-7"
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
20'-0"DRIVWAY WIDTH, TYP
23'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 1ST FLOOR26'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 2ND FLOOR 15'-2" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDREAR SETABACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF) PORCH (102 SF) X
2,163 SF
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] HOUSE 1COVER SHEETBLOCK DIAGRAMA-0.01
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
1.working hours: no work shall commence on the job site prior to 7:00a.m. nor continue later than 7:00 p.m., monday through friday, 9:00a.m. nor continue later than 6:00 p.m. saturdy and 10:00 a.m. - 6:00pm on sunday and holidays.2.general contractor shall verify all underground utility locationsprior to excavation, trenching, or grading of any kind. generalcontractor shall coordinate with applicable utility companies whenrerouting electrical, telephone, cable tv, gas, water, sanitary sewerservices, or any other utility. g. c. shall maintain all electrical andcommunication systems in house at all times.3.all work is to be performed in accordance with all governing codes,ordinances, and regulations. g. c. shall become familiar with all cityof campbell aspects of working. general contractor shall beresponsible for coordination and execution of the work shown orimplied in the construction documents and is responsible forconstruction means, methods, and procedures.4.general contractor shall coordinate all facets of his work and alltrades involved to avoid conflict in the location, installation, andconstruction of all items of work as indicated on the constructiondocuments. if any work is to be installed by the owner directly,allowances for the owner's work must be made. coordinate witharchitect / owner.5.general contractor shall leave the job site "broom clean" at the endof each working day. all materials shall be stored in a neat and safeplace to avoid accidents, for construction and for the owner.6.in case of any discrepancy in the contract documents, consult thearchitect before proceeding.7.no dimensions shall be taken by scaling from the drawings. detailstake precedence over general sections or floor plans. if dimensionsmust be clarified, consult the architect. refer to the cover sheet fordimensioning standards.8.verify all dimensions on the job site prior to ordering ormanufacturing.9.general contractor shall review all architectural drawings beforeframing. coordinate recessed light fixture locations, shafts, andhvac ductwork prior to framing. it is imperative that framing memberlocations do not conflict with locations of recessed light fixtures. ifconflict exists, notify architect.10.general contractor shall install all appliances specified and allnew equipment according to manufacturer's instructions. allguarantees, instruction booklets, and information regarding newequipment shall be handed directly to the owner in one manilaenvelope at the time of substantial completion. contractor shallverify that every piece of equipment and every appliance is in perfectworking order and that information about all warranties andguarantees is made known to the owner.11.the installer of each major unit of work is required to inspect thesubstrate and conditions to receive work and shall report allunsatisfactory conditions to the general contractor and not proceeduntil satisfactory conditions are attained.12.for mounting heights not clearly outlined in the plans or schedules,coordinate with the architect. architect shall confirm all electricaldevice and light fixture locations before contractor pulls wire.13.provide solid blocking as necessary for wall mounted shelves,fixtures, and fittings, even when work is to be done by owner directly.review scope of work and locations from interior elevations andcoordinate with owner/architect.14.all fastening devices to be concealed, unless otherwise shown.15.weather-strip all exterior doors and windows.16.caulk or otherwise seal around all openings to limit infiltration,including but not limited to: exterior joints around windows anddoor frames, between sole plates and floors and between exteriorwall panels.17.general contractor shall verify that all work on the exterior of theproject is watertight. all joints exposed to the elements shall betested for water tightness prior to substantial completion.
1.water meter may be upgraded / upsized to 1" radio read per city'sapproval fire sprinkler system design plan2.new sewer cleanout per city's standard detail 15a per available city'sutility block map. please field verify the existing sewer beforeinstallation.3.remove the existing driveway approach and reconstruct a new drivewayapproach per current city's standard requirements and not complywith ada requirements.4.city street tree in park-strip 1- ANY HIDDEN CONDITIONS THAT REQUIRE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE BUILDINGPERMIT ISSUED FOR THESE PLANS MAY REQUIRE FURTHER CITY APPROVALS INCLUDING REVIEW BY THEPLANNING COMMISSION. THE BUILDING OWNER, PROJECT DESIGNER, AND/OR CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT AREVISION TO THE CITY FOR ANY WORK NOT GRAPHICALLY ILLUSTRATED ON THE JOB COPY OF THE PLANS PRIORTO PERFORMING THE WORK. 2-the roof will comply with cool roof requirements of the 2016c.e.c. 110.8 2016 3-automatic residential fire sprinkler system will be installed per crcsec 313.2. as adopted and amended by cupmc. nfpa 13d 2016edition standard. plans to be deferred to cmv residential fire sprinklersystem requirements (see city website under 'fire handouts') coordinatewater meter and water main sizes with approved fire sprinkler shopdrawings. min " 1-1/2meter " 1-1/2& service line unless hydrauliccalculations prove existing adequate). 4-finished roofing material shall be installed and completed prior toframe inspection. 5-installation instructions for all listed equipment shall be providedto the building inspector at rough inspection 2016. (cmc 303.1and 2016cpc )310.46-property line survey will be completed by a licensed surveyor andprovided to the building inspector prior to foundation inspection. 7-building height verification will be completed by a licensed surveyorand provided to the building inspector prior to framing inspection. 8-completed cf2r-ltg-01-e form must be provided to the city buildinginspector, prior to final inspection. 9-the building must provide the homeowner with a luminaires schedule(as required in title 24california code of regulations part (10-103 1b) that includes a list of lamps installed in the luminaires. 10-The soil engineer shall be retained to provide observation, compaction, and testing services during the grading and foundationphase ofconstruction to verify elements of the soils report. Site visitreports shall be submitted to the Building Department Inspector ofRecord (IOR) 11-This project will require that a surveyor approve the foundationforms in terms of setback accuracy and floor level heights prior toplacing concrete. Language for the letter must be as written as perCampbell’s surveyor handoutavailable through the BuildingDepartment. 1)this project shall comply with california fire code (cfc), 2016 city ofcampbell municipal code (cupmc) & california code of regulations(ccr).2)all construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of thecfc chapter 33 and our standard detail and specification si-7. per cfcchp.333)potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination causedby fire protection water supplies. per 2010 cfc sec. 903.3.5 andhealth and safety code 13114.7.4)approved building numbers shall be placed in a position that is plainlylegible and visible from the street fronting the property. per cfc sec.505.1.
A-0.01 COVERSHEETA-1.01 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC MAP/DEMOLITION PLANA-1.11 PROPOSED SITE PLANA-2.01 HOUSE 1 1ST FLOOR PLANA-2.11 HOUSE 1 2ND FLOOR PLAN & ROOF PLANA-3.01 HOUSE 1 FRONT & REAR ELEVATIONS / DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULEA-3.11 HOUSE 1 RIGHT & LEFT ELEVATIONSA-4.01 HOUSE 1 SECTIONSA-5.01 TYPICAL DETAILS 1323 ELAM AVE., CAMPBELL, CA 9500840-30-90-046NEW 2-STORY 4 SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES WITHATTACHED GARAGERESIDENTIAL (0-4.4 DU/AC)R-M-PDR-3UTYPE V-B2-STORYFLAT
GENERAL INFORMATION
PROJECT INFORMATIONVICINITY MAPSHEET INDEXARCHITECTURALNOTESGENERAL NOTES ADDITIONAL NOTES
PUBLIC WORKS NOTES
STRUCTURAL
FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES
PROPERTY ADDRESS:A.P.N.:DESCRIPTION OF WORK:LAND USE:ZONING:OCCUPANCY GROUP:GARAGE OCCUPANCY GROUP:TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:STORIES:AVERAGE SLOPE:
CIVIL1 TITLE SHEET2 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP3 DEMOLITION PLAN4 OVERALL SITE PLAN5 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN6 UTILITY PLAN7 IMPERVIOUS AREA PLAN8 STORM DRAIN PLAN9 STORMWATER SECTIONS10 DETAILS11 DETAILS12 GRADING SPECIFICATIONS13 GRADING SPECIFICATIONS14 EROSION CONTROL PLAN15 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS16 BUILDING FOR A CLEAN BAY LANDSCAPINGL-2 OFF-SITE LANDSCAPE PLANTITLE 24T-24.1 ENERGY CALCULATIONST-24.2 ENERGY CALCULATIONS FLOOR CALCULATIONPROPOSED FLOOR AREA:FIRST FLOOR 860 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR 924 SQ. FT.TOTAL LIVING AREA 1,784 SQ. FT.GARAGE 379 SQ. FT.TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,163 SQ. FT.MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE 40%PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE 31%NET LOT AREA 17,777 SQ.FT.BLDG. HEIGHT (PROPOSED GRADE) +/- 27'-0"BLDG. HEIGHT (AVG. NAT. GRADE) +/- 26'-6 1/2"OPEN SPACE 624 SQ. FT.
YANHUA RESIDENCEH O U S E 1
A.divert a minimum of 65%of the construction & demolition waste forrecycle or reuse per cgbsc 4.408.1B.please provide a copy of the operation and maintenance manual tothe building occupant or owner addressing items 1through 10in section 4.410.1C.automatic irrigation systems controllers installed at the time offinal inspection shall be weather based 94.304.1D.duct systems are sized, designed, and equipment is selected persection 4.507.2hvac system installers must be trained andcertified and special inspectors employed by the enforcing agencymust be qualified. E.protect annular spaces around pipes, electric cables, conduits atexterior wall against the passage of rodents 94.406.1F.cover duct openings and other related air distribution componentopenings during construction 4.504.1G.adhesives, sealants and caulks shall be complaint with voc andother toxic compounds during construction 4.504.2.1H.paint, stain and other coating shall be compliant with voc limits4.504.2.2I.aerosol paints and coatings shall be compliant with productweighted mir limits for roc and other toxic compounds . 4.504.2.3documentation shall be provided to verify complianceJ.carpet systems shall be compliant with voc limits .4.504.3K.minimum 80%of floor area receiving resilient flooring shall complywith the voc-emission limits per sections 4.504.4L.particleboard, medium density fiberboard (mdf) and hardwoodplywood used in interior finish system shall comply with lowformaldehyde emission standards 4.504.5M.install capillary break and vapor retarded at slab on gradefoundation 4.505.2N.check moister content of building materials used in wall and floorframing before enclosure 4.505.3O.project modeled with compliance with cool roof and pipe insulations- all lines. P.hers verification required for the hvac -distribution systems and iaq(indoor air quality). provide evidence of third party verification(hers) to project building inspector, prior to final inspection.This building incorporates features that require field testing and/orverification by a ceRtified rater under the supervision of aCEC.aprroved HERSQ.exhaust fans in bahrooms will be energy star compliant, terminateoutside the building, and will be controlled by a humidity controlcapable of adjustment between a relative humidity range of 50 percent to 80percent per cgbsc 4.506.1R.Per Cal Green , 4.504there shall be no use of products includingmaterials, paints, solvents, primers, caulks, or glues that exceedsCalifornia’s limit on Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) on thisproject. 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC)2016 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (CRC)2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC)2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC)2016 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC)2016 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE (CEnC)2016 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE (CGBSC) AND THE CITY OF CAMPBELL ORDINANCES
APPLICABLE CODES
CALGREEN NOTES 1S GENERAL NOTES2S FOUNDATION PLAN3S 2ND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN4S ROOF + CEILING FRAMING PLANS5S FOUNDATION DETAILS6S HARDY FRAME DETAILS7S FRAMING DETAILS8S FRAMING DETAILS9S FRAMING DETAILS AN AUTOMATED RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BEINSTALLED IN THE (N) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS PER CRC R313.2CONTACT CITY OF CAMPBELL UTILITIES & SUBMIT A UTILITY APPLICATIONWHICH INCLUDES 40 GPM FOR FIRE SPRINKLER DEMAND. WATER METERSIZE NEEDS TO BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVALOF PROJECT.FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE APPROVED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.
FIRE SPRINKLER NOTES
LOT SIZE: 4,167 SQ. FT. 0-1.0BLOCK DIAGRAMSCALE: 1/16 " 1'-0"
L-1 ON-SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN
ON-SITE GRADING & DRANAGE PLANS
OFF-SITE GRADING & DRANAGE PLANS1 TITLE SHEET2 DEMOLITION PLAN3 STREET PLAN AND PROFILE4 HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN5 CITY DETAILS6 STREET LIGHT ELECTRICAL DETAILS7 BUILDING FOR A CLEAN BAY UTILITYJT1 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE TITLE SHEETJT2 JOINT TRENCH GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILSJT3 JOINT TRENCH DETAILSJT4 JOINT TRENCH SECTIONS AND DETAILSJT5 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE PLANJT6 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE PLAN MEP1 HOUSE 1 1ST FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLANMEP2 HOUSE 1 2ND FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLANELECTRICAL 1323
Waste Management StatementConstruction wash-out water from concrete, mortar, tile, taping, and painting shall be done in a portable containment pool or in a lined evaporative pit. Wash-out shall not enter the storm water system. Trash piles shall not be located in the front yard or visible from the street. Trash piles shall not contain: paints, solvents, glues, taping compound, food products, or easily recycle-able discardssuch as bottles, cans, plastics, or paper. Remaining trash shall be limited to concrete, wood, drywall, roofing, and assorted metals and shall be covered with a waterproof tarp. Trash shall be separated at an approved bay area disposal site such as Guadalupe Recycling. All trash is to be quickly hauled off site. Retain the receipt and keep with the permit documents, proof of recycle and disposal of the job site trash will be checked periodically and prior to final inspection. Or call West Valley Collection and Recycling 283-9250) 408(will deliver a roll-off debris box and sort the trash off site L-4 OFF-SITE LANDSCAPE PLANL-3 ON-SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN
10.c
Packet Pg. 276
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
X XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
X
XXXX X
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X XXXX X XXXX
30'-0"(N) CITY DEDICATION
15'-0"PL SETBACK
15'-0"PL SETBACK
+/- 5' ROW TO BE DEDICATED IN FEE15'-0"ROW / PL SETBACK (E) UTILITY EASEMENT(N) CITY DEDICATION
(N) PROPERTY LINE POST DEDICATION
(E) PROPERTY LINE PRE DEDICATIONHOUSE 1
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)
PORCH (121 SF)
HOUSE 218'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 3
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 418'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)FIRE TURNAROUNDPAINTED RED CURB 25'-6"GARAGE TO PL (TYP)
624 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE788 SF OPEN SPACE 23'-11 1/2"BLDG TO PL (TYP)1'-7"
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKINGNO PARKING SIGN FORFIRE TRUCK TURNAROUND
5'-0"
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATIONADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
(N) PUBLICSERVICEEASEMENT
PROPOSED LOCATION OF (4) MAIL BOXESW/ FLOOR MOUNTED POSTMAILBOX TO BE 41" - 45" ABOVE FLOORFINISH TO BOTTOM OF BOX OR POINT OFMAIL ENTRY.BOX TO MEET POSTMASTER GENERAL'SSEAL OF APPROVAL. 15'-0"42" TALL FENCE
20'-0"DRIVWAY WIDTH, TYP25' BACKUP DISTANCE FORGUEST PARKING LOCATION OF SIGN FOR GUESTPARKING TOW AWAY NOTICE 23'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 1ST FLOOR26'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 2ND FLOOR 15'-2" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDREAR SETABACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF) PORCH (102 SF) X
GUESTPARKING
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] A-1.11 1-1PROPOSED SITE PLANSCALE: 3/32 1
-0
HOUSE1PROPOSEDSITE PLAN
SITE NOTES:ALL DIMENSIONS AND SETBACK POINTS NEED TO BECHECKED BEFORE THE ADDITION TAKES PLACE. PLEASEVERIFY ALL SETBACKS FROM THE BOUNDARY OF THEPROPERTY TO THE <E> HOUSE AND <N> ADDITIONSPRI0R TO DIGGING NEW FOUNDATION AND POURING OFTHE CONCRETE OR FORM WORK SETUP. IF THE SETBACKAT THE SITE DOES NOT MATCH UP TO THE DRAWING ORIS OVER THE ALLOWABLE SETBACK PLEASE CONTACTTHE PROJECT ARCHITECT FOR FURTHER GUIDANCE ONTHE PROJECT.SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS SHOWNON THE APPROVED SITE IMPROVEMENT / GRADING &DRAINAGE PLAN ( BLD 2019-00823 ) 1323
10.c
Packet Pg. 277
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
FRIDGE36"
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] HOUSE 11ST FLOORPLANA-2.01 2-1HOUSE 1 1ST FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" THRESHOLD NOTE:ATTIC ACCESS NOTE:
1323
10.c
Packet Pg. 278
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] HOUSE 12ND FLOORPLAN &ROOF PLANA-2.11 2-2HOUSE 1 2ND FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2-3HOUSE 1 ROOF PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1323
10.c
Packet Pg. 279
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
HOUSE 1FRONT (SOUTH)& REAR (NORTH)ELEVATIONSdoor & windowschedulesegress windowsA-3.01 ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] 3-1HOUSE 1FRONT (SOUTH) ELEVATION
3-2HOUSE 1 REAR (NORTH) ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
3-3HOUSE 1 DOOR SCHEDULE
3-4HOUSE 1 GENERAL WINDOW SCHEDULE
3-5EGRESS WINDOWS
1323
10.c
Packet Pg. 280
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
22341
HOUSE 1LEFT (WEST) &RIGHT (EAST)ELEVATIONSA-3.11
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] 3-7HOUSE 1 LEFT (WEST) ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
3-6HOUSE 1 RIGHT (EAST) ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1323
10.c
Packet Pg. 281
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10'11'-1"TOP PLATESEND FLOOR FLOOR FINISH9'TOP PLATE
27'BUILDING HEIGHT
HOUSE 1CROSSSECTIONSA-4.01
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] B-BHOUSE 1 CROSS SECTIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
A-AHOUSE 1 CROSS SECTIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1323
10.c
Packet Pg. 282
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
X XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
X
XXXX XXXX
X XXXX
15'-0"PL SETBACK
15'-0"ROW / PL SETBACK
HOUSE 1
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)
PORCH (121 SF)
HOUSE 218'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 3
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 418'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)
25'-6"GARAGE TO PL (TYP)
624 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE788 SF OPEN SPACE 23'-11 1/2"BLDG TO PL (TYP)1'-7"
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
5'-0"(N) PUBLICSERVICE
20'-0"DRIVWAY WIDTH, TYP
23'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 1ST FLOOR26'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 2ND FLOOR 15'-2" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDREAR SETABACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF) PORCH (102 SF) X
2,072 SF
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] HOUSE 2COVER SHEETA-0.02
1.working hours: no work shall commence on the job site prior to 7:00a.m. nor continue later than 7:00 p.m., monday through friday, 9:00a.m. nor continue later than 6:00 p.m. saturdy and 10:00 a.m. - 6:00pm on sunday and holidays.2.general contractor shall verify all underground utility locationsprior to excavation, trenching, or grading of any kind. generalcontractor shall coordinate with applicable utility companies whenrerouting electrical, telephone, cable tv, gas, water, sanitary sewerservices, or any other utility. g. c. shall maintain all electrical andcommunication systems in house at all times.3.all work is to be performed in accordance with all governing codes,ordinances, and regulations. g. c. shall become familiar with all cityof campbell aspects of working. general contractor shall beresponsible for coordination and execution of the work shown orimplied in the construction documents and is responsible forconstruction means, methods, and procedures.4.general contractor shall coordinate all facets of his work and alltrades involved to avoid conflict in the location, installation, andconstruction of all items of work as indicated on the constructiondocuments. if any work is to be installed by the owner directly,allowances for the owner's work must be made. coordinate witharchitect / owner.5.general contractor shall leave the job site "broom clean" at the endof each working day. all materials shall be stored in a neat and safeplace to avoid accidents, for construction and for the owner.6.in case of any discrepancy in the contract documents, consult thearchitect before proceeding.7.no dimensions shall be taken by scaling from the drawings. detailstake precedence over general sections or floor plans. if dimensionsmust be clarified, consult the architect. refer to the cover sheet fordimensioning standards.8.verify all dimensions on the job site prior to ordering ormanufacturing.9.general contractor shall review all architectural drawings beforeframing. coordinate recessed light fixture locations, shafts, andhvac ductwork prior to framing. it is imperative that framing memberlocations do not conflict with locations of recessed light fixtures. ifconflict exists, notify architect.10.general contractor shall install all appliances specified and allnew equipment according to manufacturer's instructions. allguarantees, instruction booklets, and information regarding newequipment shall be handed directly to the owner in one manilaenvelope at the time of substantial completion. contractor shallverify that every piece of equipment and every appliance is in perfectworking order and that information about all warranties andguarantees is made known to the owner.11.the installer of each major unit of work is required to inspect thesubstrate and conditions to receive work and shall report allunsatisfactory conditions to the general contractor and not proceeduntil satisfactory conditions are attained.12.for mounting heights not clearly outlined in the plans or schedules,coordinate with the architect. architect shall confirm all electricaldevice and light fixture locations before contractor pulls wire.13.provide solid blocking as necessary for wall mounted shelves,fixtures, and fittings, even when work is to be done by owner directly.review scope of work and locations from interior elevations andcoordinate with owner/architect.14.all fastening devices to be concealed, unless otherwise shown.15.weather-strip all exterior doors and windows.16.caulk or otherwise seal around all openings to limit infiltration,including but not limited to: exterior joints around windows anddoor frames, between sole plates and floors and between exteriorwall panels.17.general contractor shall verify that all work on the exterior of theproject is watertight. all joints exposed to the elements shall betested for water tightness prior to substantial completion.
1.water meter may be upgraded / upsized to 1" radio read per city'sapproval fire sprinkler system design plan2.new sewer cleanout per city's standard detail 15a per available city'sutility block map. please field verify the existing sewer beforeinstallation.3.remove the existing driveway approach and reconstruct a new drivewayapproach per current city's standard requirements and not complywith ada requirements.4.city street tree in park-strip 1- ANY HIDDEN CONDITIONS THAT REQUIRE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE BUILDINGPERMIT ISSUED FOR THESE PLANS MAY REQUIRE FURTHER CITY APPROVALS INCLUDING REVIEW BY THEPLANNING COMMISSION. THE BUILDING OWNER, PROJECT DESIGNER, AND/OR CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT AREVISION TO THE CITY FOR ANY WORK NOT GRAPHICALLY ILLUSTRATED ON THE JOB COPY OF THE PLANS PRIORTO PERFORMING THE WORK.2-the roof will comply with cool roof requirements of the 2016c.e.c. 110.8 20163-automatic residential fire sprinkler system will be installed per crcsec 313.2. as adopted and amended by cupmc. nfpa 13d 2016edition standard. plans to be deferred to cmv residential fire sprinklersystem requirements (see city website under 'fire handouts') coordinatewater meter and water main sizes with approved fire sprinkler shopdrawings. min " 1-1/2meter " 1-1/2& service line unless hydrauliccalculations prove existing adequate). 4-finished roofing material shall be installed and completed prior toframe inspection. 5-installation instructions for all listed equipment shall be providedto the building inspector at rough inspection 2016. (cmc 303.1and 2016cpc )310.46-property line survey will be completed by a licensed surveyor andprovided to the building inspector prior to foundation inspection. 7-building height verification will be completed by a licensed surveyorand provided to the building inspector prior to framing inspection. 8-completed cf2r-ltg-01-e form must be provided to the city buildinginspector, prior to final inspection. 9-the building must provide the homeowner with a luminaires schedule(as required in title 24california code of regulations part (10-103 1b) that includes a list of lamps installed in the luminaires. 10-The soil engineer shall be retained to provide observation, compaction, and testing services during the grading and foundationphase ofconstruction to verify elements of the soils report. Site visitreports shall be submitted to the Building Department Inspector ofRecord (IOR) 11-This project will require that a surveyor approve the foundationforms in terms of setback accuracy and floor level heights prior toplacing concrete. Language for the letter must be as written as perCampbell’s surveyor handoutavailable through the BuildingDepartment. 1)this project shall comply with california fire code (cfc), 2016 city ofcampbell municipal code (cupmc) & california code of regulations(ccr).2)all construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of thecfc chapter 33 and our standard detail and specification si-7. per cfcchp.333)potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination causedby fire protection water supplies. per 2010 cfc sec. 903.3.5 andhealth and safety code 13114.7.4)approved building numbers shall be placed in a position that is plainlylegible and visible from the street fronting the property. per cfc sec.505.1. 1325 ELAM AVE., CAMPBELL, CA 9500840-30-90-046NEW 2-STORY 4 SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES WITHATTACHED GARAGERESIDENTIAL (0-4.4 DU/AC)R1-7.5R-3UTYPE V-B2-STORYFLAT
GENERAL INFORMATION
PROJECT INFORMATIONVICINITY MAPSHEET INDEXNOTESGENERAL NOTES ADDITIONAL NOTES
PUBLIC WORKS NOTES
FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES
PROPERTY ADDRESS:A.P.N.:DESCRIPTION OF WORK:LAND USE:ZONING:OCCUPANCY GROUP:GARAGE OCCUPANCY GROUP:TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:STORIES:AVERAGE SLOPE:
2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC)2016 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (CRC)2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC)2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC)2016 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC)2016 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE (CEnC)2016 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE (CGBSC) AND THE CITY OF CAMPBELL ORDINANCES
APPLICABLE CODES
CALGREEN NOTES
PROPOSED FLOOR AREA:FIRST FLOOR 913 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR 780 SQ. FT.TOTAL LIVING AREA 1,693 SQ. FT.GARAGE 379 SQ. FT.TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,072 SQ. FT.MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE 40%PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE 31%NET LOT AREA 17,777 SQ.FT.BLDG.HEIGHT (PROPOSED GRADE) +/- 26'-0"BLDG.HEIGHT (AVG. NAT. GRADE) +/- 25'-9"OPEN SPACE 731 SQ. FT.
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
YANHUA RESIDENCEH O U S E 2
FLOOR CALCULATIONLOT SIZE: 3,629 SQ. FT. 0-2.0BLOCK DIAGRAMSCALE: 1/16 " 1'-0"
AN AUTOMATED RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BEINSTALLED IN THE (N) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS PER CRC R313.2CONTACT CITY OF CAMPBELL UTILITIES & SUBMIT A UTILITY APPLICATIONWHICH INCLUDES 40 GPM FOR FIRE SPRINKLER DEMAND. WATER METERSIZE NEEDS TO BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVALOF PROJECT.FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE APPROVED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.
FIRE SPRINKLER NOTES
A-0.02 COVERSHEETA-1.02 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC MAP/DEMOLITION PLANA-1.12 PROPOSED SITE PLANA-2.02 HOUSE 1 1ST FLOOR PLANA-2.12 HOUSE 1 2ND FLOOR PLAN & ROOF PLANA-3.02 HOUSE 1 FRONT & REAR ELEVATIONS / DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULEA-3.12 HOUSE 1 RIGHT & LEFT ELEVATIONSA-4.02 HOUSE 1 SECTIONSA-5.02 TYPICAL DETAILS
ARCHITECTURAL
STRUCTURALCIVIL1 TITLE SHEET2 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP3 DEMOLITION PLAN4 OVERALL SITE PLAN5 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN6 UTILITY PLAN7 IMPERVIOUS AREA PLAN8 STORM DRAIN PLAN9 STORMWATER SECTIONS10 DETAILS11 DETAILS12 GRADING SPECIFICATIONS13 GRADING SPECIFICATIONS14 EROSION CONTROL PLAN15 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS16 BUILDING FOR A CLEAN BAY TITLE 24T-24.1 ENERGY CALCULATIONST-24.2 ENERGY CALCULATIONS1S GENERAL NOTES2S FOUNDATION PLAN3S 2ND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN4S ROOF + CEILING FRAMING PLANS5S FOUNDATION DETAILS6S HARDY FRAME DETAILS7S FRAMING DETAILS8S FRAMING DETAILS9S FRAMING DETAILSON-SITE GRADING & DRANAGE PLANS OFF-SITE GRADING & DRANAGE PLANS1 TITLE SHEET2 DEMOLITION PLAN3 STREET PLAN AND PROFILE4 HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN5 CITY DETAILS6 STREET LIGHT ELECTRICAL DETAILS7 BUILDING FOR A CLEAN BAY UTILITYJT1 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE TITLE SHEETJT2 JOINT TRENCH GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILSJT3 JOINT TRENCH DETAILSJT4 JOINT TRENCH SECTIONS AND DETAILSJT5 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE PLANJT6 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE PLAN MEP1 HOUSE 2 1ST FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLANMEP2 HOUSE 2 2ND FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLANELECTRICAL 1325
Waste Management StatementConstruction wash-out water from concrete, mortar, tile, taping, and painting shall be done in a portable containment pool or in a lined evaporative pit. Wash-out shall not enter the storm water system. Trash piles shall not be located in the front yard or visible from the street. Trash piles shall not contain: paints, solvents, glues, taping compound, food products, or easily recycle-able discardssuch as bottles, cans, plastics, or paper. Remaining trash shall be limited to concrete, wood, drywall, roofing, and assorted metals and shall be covered with a waterproof tarp. Trash shall be separated at an approved bay area disposal site such as Guadalupe Recycling. All trash is to be quickly hauled off site. Retain the receipt and keep with the permit documents, proof of recycle and disposal of the job site trash will be checked periodically and prior to final inspection. Or call West Valley Collection and Recycling 283-9250) 408(will deliver a roll-off debris box and sort the trash off site A.divert a minimum of 65%of the construction & demolition waste forrecycle or reuse per cgbsc 4.408.1B.please provide a copy of the operation and maintenance manual tothe building occupant or owner addressing items 1through 10in section 4.410.1C.automatic irrigation systems controllers installed at the time offinal inspection shall be weather based 94.304.1D.duct systems are sized, designed, and equipment is selected persection 4.507.2hvac system installers must be trained andcertified and special inspectors employed by the enforcing agencymust be qualified. E.protect annular spaces around pipes, electric cables, conduits atexterior wall against the passage of rodents 94.406.1F.cover duct openings and other related air distribution componentopenings during construction 4.504.1G.adhesives, sealants and caulks shall be complaint with voc andother toxic compounds during construction 4.504.2.1H.paint, stain and other coating shall be compliant with voc limits4.504.2.2I.aerosol paints and coatings shall be compliant with productweighted mir limits for roc and other toxic compounds . 4.504.2.3documentation shall be provided to verify complianceJ.carpet systems shall be compliant with voc limits .4.504.3K.minimum 80%of floor area receiving resilient flooring shall complywith the voc-emission limits per sections 4.504.4L.particleboard, medium density fiberboard (mdf) and hardwoodplywood used in interior finish system shall comply with lowformaldehyde emission standards 4.504.5M.install capillary break and vapor retarded at slab on gradefoundation 4.505.2N.check moister content of building materials used in wall and floorframing before enclosure 4.505.3O.project modeled with compliance with cool roof and pipe insulations- all lines. P.hers verification required for hvac -distribution systems and iaq(indoor air quality). provide evidence of third party verification(hers) to project building inspector, prior to final inspection.This building incorporates features that require field testing and/orverification by a ceRtified rater under the supervision of aCEC.aprroved HERSQ.exhaust fans in bahrooms will be energy star compliant, terminateoutside the building, and will be controlled by a humidity controlcapable of adjustment between a relative humidity range of 50 percent to 80percent per cgbsc 4.506.1R.Per Cal Green , 4.504there shall be no use of products includingmaterials, paints, solvents, primers, caulks, or glues that exceedsCalifornia’s limit on Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) on thisproject.
LANDSCAPINGL-2 OFF-SITE LANDSCAPE PLANL-1 ON-SITE LANDSCAPE PLANL-4 OFF-SITE LANDSCAPE PLANL-3 ON-SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN
10.c
Packet Pg. 283
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
X XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
X
XXXX X
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X XXXX X XXXX
30'-0"(N) CITY DEDICATION
15'-0"PL SETBACK
15'-0"PL SETBACK
+/- 5' ROW TO BE DEDICATED IN FEE15'-0"ROW / PL SETBACK (E) UTILITY EASEMENT(N) CITY DEDICATION
(N) PROPERTY LINE POST DEDICATION
(E) PROPERTY LINE PRE DEDICATIONHOUSE 1
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)
PORCH (121 SF)
HOUSE 218'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 3
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 418'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)FIRE TURNAROUNDPAINTED RED CURB 25'-6"GARAGE TO PL (TYP)
624 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE788 SF OPEN SPACE 23'-11 1/2"BLDG TO PL (TYP)1'-7"
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKINGNO PARKING SIGN FORFIRE TRUCK TURNAROUND
5'-0"
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATIONADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
(N) PUBLICSERVICEEASEMENT
PROPOSED LOCATION OF (4) MAIL BOXESW/ FLOOR MOUNTED POSTMAILBOX TO BE 41" - 45" ABOVE FLOORFINISH TO BOTTOM OF BOX OR POINT OFMAIL ENTRY.BOX TO MEET POSTMASTER GENERAL'SSEAL OF APPROVAL. 15'-0"42" TALL FENCE
20'-0"DRIVWAY WIDTH, TYP25' BACKUP DISTANCE FORGUEST PARKING LOCATION OF SIGN FOR GUESTPARKING TOW AWAY NOTICE 23'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 1ST FLOOR26'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 2ND FLOOR 15'-2" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDREAR SETABACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF) PORCH (102 SF) X
GUESTPARKING
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] A-1.12 1-2PROPOSED SITE PLANSCALE: 332 1
-0
HOUSE 2PROPOSEDSITE PLAN
SITE NOTES:ALL DIMENSIONS AND SETBACK POINTS NEED TO BECHECKED BEFORE THE ADDITION TAKES PLACE. PLEASEVERIFY ALL SETBACKS FROM THE BOUNDARY OF THEPROPERTY TO THE <E> HOUSE AND <N> ADDITIONSPRI0R TO DIGGING NEW FOUNDATION AND POURING OFTHE CONCRETE OR FORM WORK SETUP. IF THE SETBACKAT THE SITE DOES NOT MATCH UP TO THE DRAWING ORIS OVER THE ALLOWABLE SETBACK PLEASE CONTACTTHE PROJECT ARCHITECT FOR FURTHER GUIDANCE ONTHE PROJECT. 1325
10.c
Packet Pg. 284
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
FRIDGE36"
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] HOUSE 21ST FLOORPLANA-2.02 2-4HOUSE 2 1ST FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" THRESHOLD NOTE:ATTIC ACCESS NOTE:
1325
2 10.c
Packet Pg. 285
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] HOUSE 22ND FLOORPLAN &ROOF PLANA-2.12 2-5HOUSE 2 2ND FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2-6HOUSE 2 ROOF PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1325
2 10.c
Packet Pg. 286
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
HOUSE 2FRONT (EAST) &REAR (WEST)ELEVATIONSdoor & windowschedulesegress windowsA-3.02 ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] 3-8HOUSE 2 FRONT (EAST) ELEVATION
3-9HOUSE 2 REAR (WEST) ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
3-10HOUSE 2 DOOR SCHEDULE
3-11HOUSE 2 GENERAL WINDOW SCHEDULE
3-12EGRESS WINDOWS
1325
10.c
Packet Pg. 287
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
HOUSE 2RIGHT (NORTH)LEFT (SOUTH)ELEVATIONSA-3.12
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] 3-14HOUSE 2 LEFT (SOUTH) ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
3-13HOUSE 2 RIGHT (NORTH) ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1325
10.c
Packet Pg. 288
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
HOUSE 2CROSSSECTIONSA-4.02
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] D-DHOUSE 2 CROSS SECTIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
C-CHOUSE 2 CROSS SECTIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1325
10.c
Packet Pg. 289
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
X XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
X
XXXX XXXX
X XXXX
15'-0"PL SETBACK
15'-0"ROW / PL SETBACK
HOUSE 1
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)
PORCH (121 SF)
HOUSE 218'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 3
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 418'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)
25'-6"GARAGE TO PL (TYP)
624 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE788 SF OPEN SPACE 23'-11 1/2"BLDG TO PL (TYP)1'-7"
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
5'-0"(N) PUBLICSERVICE
20'-0"DRIVWAY WIDTH, TYP
23'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 1ST FLOOR26'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 2ND FLOOR 15'-2" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDREAR SETABACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF) PORCH (102 SF) X
2,072 SF
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] HOUSE 3COVER SHEETA-0.03
1.working hours: no work shall commence on the job site prior to 7:00a.m. nor continue later than 7:00 p.m., monday through friday, 9:00a.m. nor continue later than 6:00 p.m. saturdy and 10:00 a.m. - 6:00pm on sunday and holidays.2.general contractor shall verify all underground utility locationsprior to excavation, trenching, or grading of any kind. generalcontractor shall coordinate with applicable utility companies whenrerouting electrical, telephone, cable tv, gas, water, sanitary sewerservices, or any other utility. g. c. shall maintain all electrical andcommunication systems in house at all times.3.all work is to be performed in accordance with all governing codes,ordinances, and regulations. g. c. shall become familiar with all cityof campbell aspects of working. general contractor shall beresponsible for coordination and execution of the work shown orimplied in the construction documents and is responsible forconstruction means, methods, and procedures.4.general contractor shall coordinate all facets of his work and alltrades involved to avoid conflict in the location, installation, andconstruction of all items of work as indicated on the constructiondocuments. if any work is to be installed by the owner directly,allowances for the owner's work must be made. coordinate witharchitect / owner.5.general contractor shall leave the job site "broom clean" at the endof each working day. all materials shall be stored in a neat and safeplace to avoid accidents, for construction and for the owner.6.in case of any discrepancy in the contract documents, consult thearchitect before proceeding.7.no dimensions shall be taken by scaling from the drawings. detailstake precedence over general sections or floor plans. if dimensionsmust be clarified, consult the architect. refer to the cover sheet fordimensioning standards.8.verify all dimensions on the job site prior to ordering ormanufacturing.9.general contractor shall review all architectural drawings beforeframing. coordinate recessed light fixture locations, shafts, andhvac ductwork prior to framing. it is imperative that framing memberlocations do not conflict with locations of recessed light fixtures. ifconflict exists, notify architect.10.general contractor shall install all appliances specified and allnew equipment according to manufacturer's instructions. allguarantees, instruction booklets, and information regarding newequipment shall be handed directly to the owner in one manilaenvelope at the time of substantial completion. contractor shallverify that every piece of equipment and every appliance is in perfectworking order and that information about all warranties andguarantees is made known to the owner.11.the installer of each major unit of work is required to inspect thesubstrate and conditions to receive work and shall report allunsatisfactory conditions to the general contractor and not proceeduntil satisfactory conditions are attained.12.for mounting heights not clearly outlined in the plans or schedules,coordinate with the architect. architect shall confirm all electricaldevice and light fixture locations before contractor pulls wire.13.provide solid blocking as necessary for wall mounted shelves,fixtures, and fittings, even when work is to be done by owner directly.review scope of work and locations from interior elevations andcoordinate with owner/architect.14.all fastening devices to be concealed, unless otherwise shown.15.weather-strip all exterior doors and windows.16.caulk or otherwise seal around all openings to limit infiltration,including but not limited to: exterior joints around windows anddoor frames, between sole plates and floors and between exteriorwall panels.17.general contractor shall verify that all work on the exterior of theproject is watertight. all joints exposed to the elements shall betested for water tightness prior to substantial completion.
1.water meter may be upgraded / upsized to 1" radio read per city'sapproval fire sprinkler system design plan2.new sewer cleanout per city's standard detail 15a per available city'sutility block map. please field verify the existing sewer beforeinstallation.3.remove the existing driveway approach and reconstruct a new drivewayapproach per current city's standard requirements and not complywith ada requirements.4.city street tree in park-strip 1- ANY HIDDEN CONDITIONS THAT REQUIRE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE BUILDINGPERMIT ISSUED FOR THESE PLANS MAY REQUIRE FURTHER CITY APPROVALS INCLUDING REVIEW BY THEPLANNING COMMISSION. THE BUILDING OWNER, PROJECT DESIGNER, AND/OR CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT AREVISION TO THE CITY FOR ANY WORK NOT GRAPHICALLY ILLUSTRATED ON THE JOB COPY OF THE PLANS PRIORTO PERFORMING THE WORK. 2-the roof will comply with cool roof requirements of the 2016c.e.c. 110.8 2016 3-automatic residential fire sprinkler system will be installed per crcsec 313.2. as adopted and amended by cupmc. nfpa 13d 2016edition standard. plans to be deferred to cmv residential fire sprinklersystem requirements (see city website under 'fire handouts') coordinatewater meter and water main sizes with approved fire sprinkler shopdrawings. min " 1-1/2meter " 1-1/2& service line unless hydrauliccalculations prove existing adequate). 4-finished roofing material shall be installed and completed prior toframe inspection. 5-installation instructions for all listed equipment shall be providedto the building inspector at rough inspection 2016. (cmc 303.1and 2016cpc )310.4 6-property line survey will be completed by a licensed surveyor andprovided to the building inspector prior to foundation inspection. 7-building height verification will be completed by a licensed surveyorand provided to the building inspector prior to framing inspection. 8-completed cf2r-ltg-01-e form must be provided to the city buildinginspector, prior to final inspection. 9-the building must provide the homeowner with a luminaires schedule(as required in title 24california code of regulations part (10-103 1b) that includes a list of lamps installed in the luminaires. 10-The soil engineer shall be retained to provide observation, compaction, and testing services during the grading and foundationphase ofconstruction to verify elements of the soils report. Site visitreports shall be submitted to the Building Department Inspector ofRecord (IOR) 11-This project will require that a surveyor approve the foundationforms in terms of setback accuracy and floor level heights prior toplacing concrete. Language for the letter must be as written as perCampbell’s surveyor handoutavailable through the BuildingDepartment. 1)this project shall comply with california fire code (cfc), 2016 city ofcampbell municipal code (cupmc) & california code of regulations(ccr).2)all construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of thecfc chapter 33 and our standard detail and specification si-7. per cfcchp.333)potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination causedby fire protection water supplies. per 2010 cfc sec. 903.3.5 andhealth and safety code 13114.7.4)approved building numbers shall be placed in a position that is plainlylegible and visible from the street fronting the property. per cfc sec.505.1. 1327 ELAM AVE., CAMPBELL, CA 9500840-30-90-046NEW 2-STORY 4 SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES WITHATTACHED GARAGERESIDENTIAL (0-4.4 DU/AC)R1-7.5R-3UTYPE V-B2-STORYFLAT
GENERAL INFORMATION
PROJECT INFORMATIONVICINITY MAPSHEET INDEXNOTESGENERAL NOTES ADDITIONAL NOTES
PUBLIC WORKS NOTES
FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES
PROPERTY ADDRESS:A.P.N.:DESCRIPTION OF WORK:LAND USE:ZONING:OCCUPANCY GROUP:GARAGE OCCUPANCY GROUP:TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:STORIES:AVERAGE SLOPE:LOT SIZE: 3,629 SQ. FT. 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC)2016 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (CRC)2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC)2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC)2016 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC)2016 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE (CEnC)2016 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE (CGBSC) AND THE CITY OF CAMPBELL ORDINANCES
APPLICABLE CODES
CALGREEN NOTES
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
YANHUA RESIDENCEH O U S E 3
PROPOSED FLOOR AREA:FIRST FLOOR 913 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR 780 SQ. FT.TOTAL LIVING AREA 1,693 SQ. FT.GARAGE 379 SQ. FT.TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,072 SQ. FT.MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE 40%PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE 31%NET LOT AREA 17,777 SQ.FT.BLDG.HEIGHT (PROPOSED GRADE) +/- 26'-0"BLDG.HEIGHT (AVG. NAT. GRADE) +/- 26'-3"OPEN SPACE 731 SQ. FT.
FLOOR CALCULATION
AN AUTOMATED RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BEINSTALLED IN THE (N) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS PER CRC R313.2CONTACT CITY OF CAMPBELL UTILITIES & SUBMIT A UTILITY APPLICATIONWHICH INCLUDES 40 GPM FOR FIRE SPRINKLER DEMAND. WATER METERSIZE NEEDS TO BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVALOF PROJECT.FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE APPROVED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.
FIRE SPRINKLER NOTES
0-3.0BLOCK DIAGRAMSCALE: 1/16 " 1'-0"
A-0.03 COVERSHEETA-1.03 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC MAP/DEMOLITION PLANA-1.13 PROPOSED SITE PLANA-2.03 HOUSE 1 1ST FLOOR PLANA-2.13 HOUSE 1 2ND FLOOR PLAN & ROOF PLANA-3.03 HOUSE 1 FRONT & REAR ELEVATIONS / DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULEA-3.13 HOUSE 1 RIGHT & LEFT ELEVATIONSA-4.03 HOUSE 1 SECTIONSA-5.03 TYPICAL DETAILS
ARCHITECTURAL
STRUCTURALCIVIL1 TITLE SHEET2 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP3 DEMOLITION PLAN4 OVERALL SITE PLAN5 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN6 UTILITY PLAN7 IMPERVIOUS AREA PLAN8 STORM DRAIN PLAN9 STORMWATER SECTIONS10 DETAILS11 DETAILS12 GRADING SPECIFICATIONS13 GRADING SPECIFICATIONS14 EROSION CONTROL PLAN15 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS16 BUILDING FOR A CLEAN BAY TITLE 24T-24.1 ENERGY CALCULATIONST-24.2 ENERGY CALCULATIONS1S GENERAL NOTES2S FOUNDATION PLAN3S 2ND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN4S ROOF + CEILING FRAMING PLANS5S FOUNDATION DETAILS6S HARDY FRAME DETAILS7S FRAMING DETAILS8S FRAMING DETAILS9S FRAMING DETAILSON-SITE GRADING & DRANAGE PLANS OFF-SITE GRADING & DRANAGE PLANS1 TITLE SHEET2 DEMOLITION PLAN3 STREET PLAN AND PROFILE4 HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN5 CITY DETAILS6 STREET LIGHT ELECTRICAL DETAILS7 BUILDING FOR A CLEAN BAY UTILITYJT1 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE TITLE SHEETJT2 JOINT TRENCH GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILSJT3 JOINT TRENCH DETAILSJT4 JOINT TRENCH SECTIONS AND DETAILSJT5 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE PLANJT6 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE PLAN MEP1 HOUSE 3 1ST FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLANMEP2 HOUSE 3 2ND FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLANELECTRICAL 1327
Waste Management StatementConstruction wash-out water from concrete, mortar, tile, taping, and painting shall be done in a portable containment pool or in a lined evaporative pit. Wash-out shall not enter the storm water system. Trash piles shall not be located in the front yard or visible from the street. Trash piles shall not contain: paints, solvents, glues, taping compound, food products, or easily recycle-able discardssuch as bottles, cans, plastics, or paper. Remaining trash shall be limited to concrete, wood, drywall, roofing, and assorted metals and shall be covered with a waterproof tarp. Trash shall be separated at an approved bay area disposal site such as Guadalupe Recycling. All trash is to be quickly hauled off site. Retain the receipt and keep with the permit documents, proof of recycle and disposal of the job site trash will be checked periodically and prior to final inspection. Or call West Valley Collection and Recycling 283-9250) 408(will deliver a roll-off debris box and sort the trash off site A.divert a minimum of 65%of the construction & demolition waste forrecycle or reuse per cgbsc 4.408.1B.please provide a copy of the operation and maintenance manual tothe building occupant or owner addressing items 1through 10in section 4.410.1C.automatic irrigation systems controllers installed at the time offinal inspection shall be weather based 94.304.1D.duct systems are sized, designed, and equipment is selected persection 4.507.2hvac system installers must be trained andcertified and special inspectors employed by the enforcing agencymust be qualified. E.protect annular spaces around pipes, electric cables, conduits atexterior wall against the passage of rodents 94.406.1F.cover duct openings and other related air distribution componentopenings during construction 4.504.1G.adhesives, sealants and caulks shall be complaint with voc andother toxic compounds during construction 4.504.2.1H.paint, stain and other coating shall be compliant with voc limits4.504.2.2I.aerosol paints and coatings shall be compliant with productweighted mir limits for roc and other toxic compounds . 4.504.2.3documentation shall be provided to verify complianceJ.carpet systems shall be compliant with voc limits .4.504.3K.minimum 80%of floor area receiving resilient flooring shall complywith the voc-emission limits per sections 4.504.4L.particleboard, medium density fiberboard (mdf) and hardwoodplywood used in interior finish system shall comply with lowformaldehyde emission standards 4.504.5M.install capillary break and vapor retarded at slab on gradefoundation 4.505.2N.check moister content of building materials used in wall and floorframing before enclosure 4.505.3O.project modeled with compliance with cool roof and pipe insulations- all lines. P.hers verification required for the hvac -distribution systems and iaq(indoor air quality). provide evidence of third party verification(hers) to project building inspector, prior to final inspection.This building incorporates features that require field testing and/orverification by a ceRtified rater under the supervision of aCEC.aprroved HERSQ.exhaust fans in bahrooms will be energy star compliant, terminateoutside the building, and will be controlled by a humidity controlcapable of adjustment between a relative humidity range of 50 percent to 80percent per cgbsc 4.506.1R.Per Cal Green , 4.504there shall be no use of products includingmaterials, paints, solvents, primers, caulks, or glues that exceedsCalifornia’s limit on Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) on thisproject.
LANDSCAPINGL-2 OFF-SITE LANDSCAPE PLANL-1 ON-SITE LANDSCAPE PLANL-4 OFF-SITE LANDSCAPE PLANL-3 ON-SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN
10.c
Packet Pg. 290
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
X XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
X
XXXX X
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X XXXX X XXXX
30'-0"(N) CITY DEDICATION
15'-0"PL SETBACK
15'-0"PL SETBACK
+/- 5' ROW TO BE DEDICATED IN FEE15'-0"ROW / PL SETBACK (E) UTILITY EASEMENT(N) CITY DEDICATION
(N) PROPERTY LINE POST DEDICATION
(E) PROPERTY LINE PRE DEDICATIONHOUSE 1
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)
PORCH (121 SF)
HOUSE 218'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 3
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 418'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)FIRE TURNAROUNDPAINTED RED CURB 25'-6"GARAGE TO PL (TYP)
624 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE788 SF OPEN SPACE 23'-11 1/2"BLDG TO PL (TYP)1'-7"
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKINGNO PARKING SIGN FORFIRE TRUCK TURNAROUND
5'-0"
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATIONADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
(N) PUBLICSERVICEEASEMENT
PROPOSED LOCATION OF (4) MAIL BOXESW/ FLOOR MOUNTED POSTMAILBOX TO BE 41" - 45" ABOVE FLOORFINISH TO BOTTOM OF BOX OR POINT OFMAIL ENTRY.BOX TO MEET POSTMASTER GENERAL'SSEAL OF APPROVAL. 15'-0"42" TALL FENCE
20'-0"DRIVWAY WIDTH, TYP25' BACKUP DISTANCE FORGUEST PARKING LOCATION OF SIGN FOR GUESTPARKING TOW AWAY NOTICE 23'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 1ST FLOOR26'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 2ND FLOOR 15'-2" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDREAR SETABACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF) PORCH (102 SF) X
GUESTPARKING
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] A-1.13 1-3PROPOSED SITE PLANSCALE: 332 1
-0
HOUSE 3PROPOSEDSITE PLAN
SITE NOTES:ALL DIMENSIONS AND SETBACK POINTS NEED TO BECHECKED BEFORE THE ADDITION TAKES PLACE. PLEASEVERIFY ALL SETBACKS FROM THE BOUNDARY OF THEPROPERTY TO THE <E> HOUSE AND <N> ADDITIONSPRI0R TO DIGGING NEW FOUNDATION AND POURING OFTHE CONCRETE OR FORM WORK SETUP. IF THE SETBACKAT THE SITE DOES NOT MATCH UP TO THE DRAWING ORIS OVER THE ALLOWABLE SETBACK PLEASE CONTACTTHE PROJECT ARCHITECT FOR FURTHER GUIDANCE ONTHE PROJECT. 1327
10.c
Packet Pg. 291
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
FIRST FLOOR -1,332 SF
FRIDGE36"
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] HOUSE 31ST FLOORPLANA-2.03 2-7HOUSE 3 1ST FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" THRESHOLD NOTE:ATTIC ACCESS NOTE:
1327
10.c
Packet Pg. 292
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
SECOND FLOOR - 828 SF
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] HOUSE 32ND FLOORPLAN &ROOF PLANA-2.13 2-8HOUSE 3 2ND FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2-9HOUSE 3 ROOF PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1327
10.c
Packet Pg. 293
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
HOUSE 3FRONT (EAST) &REAR (WEST)ELEVATIONSdoor & windowschedulesegress windowsA-3.03 ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] 3-15HOUSE 3 FRONT (EAST) ELEVATION
3-16HOUSE 3 REAR (WEST) ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
3-17HOUSE 3 DOOR SCHEDULE
3-18HOUSE 3 GENERAL WINDOW SCHEDULE
3-19EGRESS WINDOWS
1327
10.c
Packet Pg. 294
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
HOUSE 3RIGHT (NORTH)LEFT (SOUTH)ELEVATIONSA-3.13
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] 3-21HOUSE 3 RIGHT (NORTH) ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
3-20HOUSE 3 LEFT (SOUTH) ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1327
10.c
Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
HOUSE 3CROSSSECTIONSA-4.03
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] F-FHOUSE 3 CROSS SECTIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
E-EHOUSE 3 CROSS SECTIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1327
10.c
Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
X XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
X
XXXX XXXXXX
X XXXX
15'-0"PL SETBACK
15'-0"ROW / PL SETBACK
HOUSE 1
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)
PORCH (121 SF)
HOUSE 218'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 3
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 418'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)
25'-6"GARAGE TO PL (TYP)
624 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE788 SF OPEN SPACE 23'-11 1/2"BLDG TO PL (TYP)1'-7"
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
5'-0"(N) PUBLIC
20'-0"DRIVWAY WIDTH, TYP
23'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 1ST FLOOR26'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 2ND FLOOR 15'-2" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDREAR SETABACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF) PORCH (102 SF) X
2,045 SF
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] HOUSE 4COVER SHEETA-0.04
1.working hours: no work shall commence on the job site prior to 7:00a.m. nor continue later than 7:00 p.m., monday through friday, 9:00a.m. nor continue later than 6:00 p.m. saturdy and 10:00 a.m. - 6:00pm on sunday and holidays.2.general contractor shall verify all underground utility locationsprior to excavation, trenching, or grading of any kind. generalcontractor shall coordinate with applicable utility companies whenrerouting electrical, telephone, cable tv, gas, water, sanitary sewerservices, or any other utility. g. c. shall maintain all electrical andcommunication systems in house at all times.3.all work is to be performed in accordance with all governing codes,ordinances, and regulations. g. c. shall become familiar with all cityof campbell aspects of working. general contractor shall beresponsible for coordination and execution of the work shown orimplied in the construction documents and is responsible forconstruction means, methods, and procedures.4.general contractor shall coordinate all facets of his work and alltrades involved to avoid conflict in the location, installation, andconstruction of all items of work as indicated on the constructiondocuments. if any work is to be installed by the owner directly,allowances for the owner's work must be made. coordinate witharchitect / owner.5.general contractor shall leave the job site "broom clean" at the endof each working day. all materials shall be stored in a neat and safeplace to avoid accidents, for construction and for the owner.6.in case of any discrepancy in the contract documents, consult thearchitect before proceeding.7.no dimensions shall be taken by scaling from the drawings. detailstake precedence over general sections or floor plans. if dimensionsmust be clarified, consult the architect. refer to the cover sheet fordimensioning standards.8.verify all dimensions on the job site prior to ordering ormanufacturing.9.general contractor shall review all architectural drawings beforeframing. coordinate recessed light fixture locations, shafts, andhvac ductwork prior to framing. it is imperative that framing memberlocations do not conflict with locations of recessed light fixtures. ifconflict exists, notify architect.10.general contractor shall install all appliances specified and allnew equipment according to manufacturer's instructions. allguarantees, instruction booklets, and information regarding newequipment shall be handed directly to the owner in one manilaenvelope at the time of substantial completion. contractor shallverify that every piece of equipment and every appliance is in perfectworking order and that information about all warranties andguarantees is made known to the owner.11.the installer of each major unit of work is required to inspect thesubstrate and conditions to receive work and shall report allunsatisfactory conditions to the general contractor and not proceeduntil satisfactory conditions are attained.12.for mounting heights not clearly outlined in the plans or schedules,coordinate with the architect. architect shall confirm all electricaldevice and light fixture locations before contractor pulls wire.13.provide solid blocking as necessary for wall mounted shelves,fixtures, and fittings, even when work is to be done by owner directly.review scope of work and locations from interior elevations andcoordinate with owner/architect.14.all fastening devices to be concealed, unless otherwise shown.15.weather-strip all exterior doors and windows.16.caulk or otherwise seal around all openings to limit infiltration,including but not limited to: exterior joints around windows anddoor frames, between sole plates and floors and between exteriorwall panels.17.general contractor shall verify that all work on the exterior of theproject is watertight. all joints exposed to the elements shall betested for water tightness prior to substantial completion.
1.water meter may be upgraded / upsized to 1" radio read per city'sapproval fire sprinkler system design plan2.new sewer cleanout per city's standard detail 15a per available city'sutility block map. please field verify the existing sewer beforeinstallation.3.remove the existing driveway approach and reconstruct a new drivewayapproach per current city's standard requirements and not complywith ada requirements.4.city street tree in park-strip 1- ANY HIDDEN CONDITIONS THAT REQUIRE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE BUILDINGPERMIT ISSUED FOR THESE PLANS MAY REQUIRE FURTHER CITY APPROVALS INCLUDING REVIEW BY THEPLANNING COMMISSION. THE BUILDING OWNER, PROJECT DESIGNER, AND/OR CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT AREVISION TO THE CITY FOR ANY WORK NOT GRAPHICALLY ILLUSTRATED ON THE JOB COPY OF THE PLANS PRIORTO PERFORMING THE WORK. 2-the roof will comply with cool roof requirements of the 2016c.e.c. 110.8 2016 3-automatic residential fire sprinkler system will be installed per crcsec 313.2. as adopted and amended by cupmc. nfpa 13d 2016edition standard. plans to be deferred to cmv residential fire sprinklersystem requirements (see city website under 'fire handouts') coordinatewater meter and water main sizes with approved fire sprinkler shopdrawings. min " 1-1/2meter " 1-1/2& service line unless hydrauliccalculations prove existing adequate). 4-finished roofing material shall be installed and completed prior toframe inspection. 5-installation instructions for all listed equipment shall be providedto the building inspector at rough inspection 2016. (cmc 303.1and 2016cpc )310.4 6-property line survey will be completed by a licensed surveyor andprovided to the building inspector prior to foundation inspection. 7-building height verification will be completed by a licensed surveyorand provided to the building inspector prior to framing inspection. 8-completed cf2r-ltg-01-e form must be provided to the city buildinginspector, prior to final inspection. 9-the building must provide the homeowner with a luminaires schedule(as required in title 24california code of regulations part (10-103 1b) that includes a list of lamps installed in the luminaires. 10-The soil engineer shall be retained to provide observation, compaction, and testing services during the grading and foundationphase ofconstruction to verify elements of the soils report. Site visitreports shall be submitted to the Building Department Inspector ofRecord (IOR) 11-This project will require that a surveyor approve the foundationforms in terms of setback accuracy and floor level heights prior toplacing concrete. Language for the letter must be as written as perCampbell’s surveyor handoutavailable through the BuildingDepartment. 1)this project shall comply with california fire code (cfc), 2016 city ofcampbell municipal code (cupmc) & california code of regulations(ccr).2)all construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of thecfc chapter 33 and our standard detail and specification si-7. per cfcchp.333)potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination causedby fire protection water supplies. per 2010 cfc sec. 903.3.5 andhealth and safety code 13114.7.4)approved building numbers shall be placed in a position that is plainlylegible and visible from the street fronting the property. per cfc sec.505.1. 1329 ELAM AVE., CAMPBELL, CA 9500840-30-90-046NEW 2-STORY 4 SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES WITHATTACHED GARAGERESIDENTIAL (0-4.4 DU/AC)R1-7.5R-3UTYPE V-B2-STORYFLAT
GENERAL INFORMATION
PROJECT INFORMATIONVICINITY MAPSHEET INDEXNOTESGENERAL NOTES ADDITIONAL NOTES
PUBLIC WORKS NOTES
FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES
PROPERTY ADDRESS:A.P.N.:DESCRIPTION OF WORK:LAND USE:ZONING:OCCUPANCY GROUP:GARAGE OCCUPANCY GROUP:TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:STORIES:AVERAGE SLOPE:LOT SIZE: 5,981 SQ. FT. 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC)2016 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (CRC)2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC)2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC)2016 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC)2016 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE (CEnC)2016 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE (CGBSC) AND THE CITY OF CAMPBELL ORDINANCES
APPLICABLE CODES
CALGREEN NOTES
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
YANHUA RESIDENCEH O U S E 4
PROPOSED FLOOR AREA:FIRST FLOOR 896 SQ. FT.SECOND FLOOR 770 SQ. FT.TOTAL LIVING AREA 1,666 SQ. FT.GARAGE 379 SQ. FT.TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,045 SQ. FT.MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE 40%PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE 31%NET LOT AREA 17,777 SQ.FT.BLDG.HEIGHT (PROPOSED GRADE) +/- 26'-0"BLDG.HEIGHT (AVG. NAT. GRADE) +/- 26'-9"OPEN SPACE 788 SQ. FT.
FLOOR CALCULATION
1-4.5BLOCK DIAGRAMSCALE: 1/16 " 1'-0"
AN AUTOMATED RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BEINSTALLED IN THE (N) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS PER CRC R313.2CONTACT CITY OF CAMPBELL UTILITIES & SUBMIT A UTILITY APPLICATIONWHICH INCLUDES 40 GPM FOR FIRE SPRINKLER DEMAND. WATER METERSIZE NEEDS TO BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVALOF PROJECT.FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE APPROVED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.
FIRE SPRINKLER NOTES
A-0.04 COVERSHEETA-1.04 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC MAP/DEMOLITION PLANA-1.14 PROPOSED SITE PLANA-2.04 HOUSE 1 1ST FLOOR PLANA-2.14 HOUSE 1 2ND FLOOR PLAN & ROOF PLANA-3.04 HOUSE 1 FRONT & REAR ELEVATIONS / DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULEA-3.14 HOUSE 1 RIGHT & LEFT ELEVATIONSA-4.04 HOUSE 1 SECTIONSA-5.04 TYPICAL DETAILS
ARCHITECTURAL
STRUCTURALCIVIL1 TITLE SHEET2 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP3 DEMOLITION PLAN4 OVERALL SITE PLAN5 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN6 UTILITY PLAN7 IMPERVIOUS AREA PLAN8 STORM DRAIN PLAN9 STORMWATER SECTIONS10 DETAILS11 DETAILS12 GRADING SPECIFICATIONS13 GRADING SPECIFICATIONS14 EROSION CONTROL PLAN15 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS16 BUILDING FOR A CLEAN BAY TITLE 24T-24.1 ENERGY CALCULATIONST-24.2 ENERGY CALCULATIONS1S GENERAL NOTES2S FOUNDATION PLAN3S 2ND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN4S ROOF + CEILING FRAMING PLANS5S FOUNDATION DETAILS6S HARDY FRAME DETAILS7S FRAMING DETAILS8S FRAMING DETAILS9S FRAMING DETAILSON-SITE GRADING & DRANAGE PLANS OFF-SITE GRADING & DRANAGE PLANS1 TITLE SHEET2 DEMOLITION PLAN3 STREET PLAN AND PROFILE4 HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN5 CITY DETAILS6 STREET LIGHT ELECTRICAL DETAILS7 BUILDING FOR A CLEAN BAY UTILITYJT1 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE TITLE SHEETJT2 JOINT TRENCH GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILSJT3 JOINT TRENCH DETAILSJT4 JOINT TRENCH SECTIONS AND DETAILSJT5 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE PLANJT6 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE PLAN MEP1 HOUSE 4 1ST FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLANMEP2 HOUSE 4 2ND FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLANELECTRICAL 1329
Waste Management StatementConstruction wash-out water from concrete, mortar, tile, taping, and painting shall be done in a portable containment pool or in a lined evaporative pit. Wash-out shall not enter the storm water system. Trash piles shall not be located in the front yard or visible from the street. Trash piles shall not contain: paints, solvents, glues, taping compound, food products, or easily recycle-able discardssuch as bottles, cans, plastics, or paper. Remaining trash shall be limited to concrete, wood, drywall, roofing, and assorted metals and shall be covered with a waterproof tarp. Trash shall be separated at an approved bay area disposal site such as Guadalupe Recycling. All trash is to be quickly hauled off site. Retain the receipt and keep with the permit documents, proof of recycle and disposal of the job site trash will be checked periodically and prior to final inspection. Or call West Valley Collection and Recycling 283-9250) 408(will deliver a roll-off debris box and sort the trash off site A.divert a minimum of 65%of the construction & demolition waste forrecycle or reuse per cgbsc 4.408.1B.please provide a copy of the operation and maintenance manual tothe building occupant or owner addressing items 1through 10in section 4.410.1C.automatic irrigation systems controllers installed at the time offinal inspection shall be weather based 94.304.1D.duct systems are sized, designed, and equipment is selected persection 4.507.2hvac system installers must be trained andcertified and special inspectors employed by the enforcing agencymust be qualified. E.protect annular spaces around pipes, electric cables, conduits atexterior wall against the passage of rodents 94.406.1F.cover duct openings and other related air distribution componentopenings during construction 4.504.1G.adhesives, sealants and caulks shall be complaint with voc andother toxic compounds during construction 4.504.2.1H.paint, stain and other coating shall be compliant with voc limits4.504.2.2I.aerosol paints and coatings shall be compliant with productweighted mir limits for roc and other toxic compounds . 4.504.2.3documentation shall be provided to verify complianceJ.carpet systems shall be compliant with voc limits .4.504.3K.minimum 80%of floor area receiving resilient flooring shall complywith the voc-emission limits per sections 4.504.4L.particleboard, medium density fiberboard (mdf) and hardwoodplywood used in interior finish system shall comply with lowformaldehyde emission standards 4.504.5M.install capillary break and vapor retarded at slab on gradefoundation 4.505.2N.check moister content of building materials used in wall and floorframing before enclosure 4.505.3O.project modeled with compliance with cool roof and pipe insulations- all lines. P.hers verification required for the hvac -distribution systems, and iaq (indoor air quality). provide evidence of third party verification(hers) to project building inspector, prior to final inspection.This building incorporates features that require field testing and/orverification by a ceRtified rater under the supervision of aCEC.aprroved HERSQ.exhaust fans in bahrooms will be energy star compliant, terminateoutside the building, and will be controlled by a humidity controlcapable of adjustment between a relative humidity range of 50 percent to 80percent per cgbsc 4.506.1R.Per Cal Green , 4.504there shall be no use of products includingmaterials, paints, solvents, primers, caulks, or glues that exceedsCalifornia’s limit on Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) on thisproject.
LANDSCAPINGL-2 OFF-SITE LANDSCAPE PLANL-1 ON-SITE LANDSCAPE PLANL-4 OFF-SITE LANDSCAPE PLANL-3 ON-SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN
10.c
Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
X XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
XX XXXXXXXXXXX
X
XXXX X
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X XXXX X XXXX
30'-0"(N) CITY DEDICATION
15'-0"PL SETBACK
15'-0"PL SETBACK
+/- 5' ROW TO BE DEDICATED IN FEE15'-0"ROW / PL SETBACK (E) UTILITY EASEMENT(N) CITY DEDICATION
(N) PROPERTY LINE POST DEDICATION
(E) PROPERTY LINE PRE DEDICATIONHOUSE 1
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)
PORCH (121 SF)
HOUSE 218'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 3
18'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)PORCH (73 SF)
HOUSE 418'x20' GARAGE(2 CAR)FIRE TURNAROUNDPAINTED RED CURB 25'-6"GARAGE TO PL (TYP)
624 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE731 SF OPEN SPACE788 SF OPEN SPACE 23'-11 1/2"BLDG TO PL (TYP)1'-7"
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKINGNO PARKING SIGN FORFIRE TRUCK TURNAROUND
5'-0"
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATIONADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APP. LOCATION
ADJACENT BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
(N) PUBLICSERVICEEASEMENT
PROPOSED LOCATION OF (4) MAIL BOXESW/ FLOOR MOUNTED POSTMAILBOX TO BE 41" - 45" ABOVE FLOORFINISH TO BOTTOM OF BOX OR POINT OFMAIL ENTRY.BOX TO MEET POSTMASTER GENERAL'SSEAL OF APPROVAL. 15'-0"42" TALL FENCE
20'-0"DRIVWAY WIDTH, TYP25' BACKUP DISTANCE FORGUEST PARKING LOCATION OF SIGN FOR GUESTPARKING TOW AWAY NOTICE 23'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 1ST FLOOR26'-0" PROPOSED SETBACK 2ND FLOOR 15'-2" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDREAR SETABACK
15'-0" PROPOSEDSIDE SETBACK
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
GUEST PARKING
PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF)PORCH (133 SF) PORCH (102 SF) X
GUESTPARKING
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] A-1.14 1-4PROPOSED SITE PLANSCALE: 332 1
-0
HOUSE 4PROPOSEDSITE PLAN
SITE NOTES:ALL DIMENSIONS AND SETBACK POINTS NEED TO BECHECKED BEFORE THE ADDITION TAKES PLACE. PLEASEVERIFY ALL SETBACKS FROM THE BOUNDARY OF THEPROPERTY TO THE <E> HOUSE AND <N> ADDITIONSPRI0R TO DIGGING NEW FOUNDATION AND POURING OFTHE CONCRETE OR FORM WORK SETUP. IF THE SETBACKAT THE SITE DOES NOT MATCH UP TO THE DRAWING ORIS OVER THE ALLOWABLE SETBACK PLEASE CONTACTTHE PROJECT ARCHITECT FOR FURTHER GUIDANCE ONTHE PROJECT. 1329
10.c
Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
FRIDGE36"
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] HOUSE 41ST FLOORPLANA-2.04 2-10HOUSE 4 1ST FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" THRESHOLD NOTE:ATTIC ACCESS NOTE:
1329
10.c
Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
SECOND FLOOR - 828 SF
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] HOUSE 42ND FLOORPLAN &ROOF PLANA-2.14 2-11HOUSE 4 2ND FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2-12HOUSE 4 ROOF PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1329
10.c
Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
HOUSE 4front (east)& rear (west)elevationsdoor & windowschedulesegress windowsA-3.04 ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] 3-22HOUSE 4 FRONT (EAST) ELEVATION
3-23HOUSE 4 REAR (WEST) ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
3-24HOUSE 4 DOOR SCHEDULE
3-25HOUSE 4 GENERAL WINDOW SCHEDULE
3-26EGRESS WINDOWS
1329
10.c
Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
HOUSE 4RIGHT (NORTH)LEFT (SOUTH)ELEVATIONSA-3.14
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] 3-28HOUSE 4 LEFT (SOUTH) ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
3-27HOUSE 4 RIGHT (NORTH) ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1329
10.c
Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
HOUSE 4CROSSSECTIONSA-4.04
ELAM AVE.CAMPBELL, CA 95008RESIDENCEYANHUA1 3 2 3 E L A M A V E. C A M P B E L L, CA 95008Y A N H U A R E S I D E N C E REVISIONS:
PROJECT NO:DRAFTED BY: REY MAPALODATE: 10/27/21THE MAJESTIC [email protected] H-HHOUSE 4 CROSS SECTIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
G-GHOUSE 4 CROSS SECTIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1329
10.c
Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: Project Plans (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.d
Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.d
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.d
Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.d
Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.d
Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.d
Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.d
Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.d
Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.d
Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.d
Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
10.d
Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
NOTICE OF INTENT
INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
Notice is hereby given of the intent of the Campbell Planning Commission to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092(b)(1) for the 1323 Elam Avenue Subdivision, which includes applications for a Planned Development Permit (PLN2017- 101) for the approval of site configuration, architectural design and to create lots which do not have frontage on a public street, Ten tative Subdivision Map (PLN2017-102) to create four single family lots and one commonly owned lot, Zoning Map Amendment (PLN2015-100) to change the zoning from R-M (Multiple -Family Residential) to P -D (Planned Development), Parking Modification Permit (PLN 2017-338) to allow for two of the required assigned/uncovered parking spaces, to be provided as uncovered guest parking pursuant to Public Resources
Code Section 21092(b)(1), for property located at 1323 Elam Avenue, Campbell, CA.
The project site consist s of a single parcel located on the north side of Elam Avenue between Inwood Drive and San Tomas Aquino Road. The 18,152 square foot (net area) lot is currently developed with one single - family residence that will be demolished as part of the proposed subd ivision. Abutting land uses include single-family homes to the east and west, an apartment community to the north, and single -family homes across Elam Avenue to the south.
The Initial Study prepared by the City was undertaken for the purpose of determin ing whether the project may have a significant effect on the environment. On the basis of the Initial Study, Community Development Department staff has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment due to the incorporati on of certain mitigation measures, and therefore, has prepared a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for consideration by the Campbell Planning Commission.
The California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) requires this notice to disclose whether any listed toxic sites are present at the location. The project location does not contain a toxic site pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.
All interested parties are invited and encouraged to submit comments in writing regarding the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and/or attend the below described public hearings. The public review period for the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration begins on November 17, 2017 and ends on December 7, 2017. Any comments must be submitted in writing, including email, to the Community Development Department by 5:00 p.m. on December 7, 2017. The Initial Study and draft Mitigated Negative Declaration are available for review from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the Community Development Department, City Hall, 70 North First Street, Campbell, CA or online at http://www.cityofcampbell.com/501/Public-Notices under ' Environmental Notices'.
The Campbell Planning Commission will consider the project and draft Mitigated Negative Declaration at a public hearing to be held on December 12, 2017. The meeting will be held at 7:30 p.m., or shortly thereafter, in the City Hall City Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, CA.
Please be advised that if you challenge the decision on the Mitigated Negative Declaration and/or pro ject in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing s described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Campbell prior to the public hearings. Questions and written comments may be addressed to Stephen Rose, Associate Planner at (408) 866- 2142 or by email at [email protected].
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CAMPBELL
PAUL KERMOYAN
SECRETARY
10.d
Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Community Development Department
70 North First Street • Campbell, CA 95008-1423 • TEL (408) 866-2140 • FAX (408) 866-5140 • E-MAIL [email protected] DRAFT
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The Community Development Director has reviewed the proposed project described below to determine whether it could have a significant effect on the environment as a result of the project completion. “Significant effect on the environment” means a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance.
Project Title: 1323 Elam Avenue Subdivision
File Number(s): Planned Development Permit (PLN2017-101) | Tentative Subdivision Map (PLN2017-102) | Zoning Map Amendment (PLN2017 -100) | CEQA Review (PLN2017-103) | Parking Modification Permit (PLN2017-338)
Project Address: 1323 Elam Avenue, Campbell CA 95008
Project Sponsor:
Gordana LLC (Attn: Gordana Pavlovic)
602 Hawthorn Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94301
(408) 307-2897
Existing Zoning: R-M (Multiple-Family Residential)
Proposed Zoning: P-D (Planned Development)
General Plan Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units/gr. acre)
Lead Agency: City of Campbell, Community Development Department 70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA 95008
Contact Person: Stephen Rose, Associate Planner
(408) 866-2142 | [email protected]
Date Posted: November 16, 2017
Other public agencies whose approval is required: None
Surrounding Land Uses / General Plan / Zoning:
North: Apartments / Medium Den. Res. / R-2 (Multiple-Family Residential) South: / Low-Medium Den. Res. / R-1-6 (Single Family Residential East: Single -Family Residential / Low -Medium Den. Res. & Med. Den. Res. / P -D (Planned Development) & Medium Density Residential
10.d
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Mitigated Negative Declaration ~ 1323 Elam Avenue Page 2 of 4
West: Single-Family Residential / Low-Medium Den. Res. / P-D (Planned Development)
Project Description: The project is an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map to allow subdivision of the project site into four single -family residential parcels, ranging from approximately 2,045 to 2,163 square feet in area. The project also includes a common lot consisting of a single private street and driveway for the subdivision, which would take access from Elam Avenue to the south. The private street will be 20 feet wi de with an additional 2 foot wide landscape buffer (porous grass pavers) on the east side of the drive aisle. The development will include construction of four two-story single-family residences at a maximum height of 26-feet, 9- inches from natural grade (27-feet from proposed grade) and an average floor area ratio of 47% for the entire development.
Finding: The Community Development Director finds that the project described above will not have a significant effect on the environment in that the attache d Initial Study identifies one or more potentially significant effects on the environment for which the project proponent, before public release of this draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, has made or agrees to make project revisions that clearly mitigate the effects to a less than significant level.
Mitigation Measures Included in the Project to Reduce Potentially Significant Environmental Effects to a Less Than Significant Level:
Mitigation Measure AIR -1:
The project applicant shall ensure that constru ction plans include the BAAQMD Best Management Practices for fugitive dust control. The following will be required for all construction activities within the project area. These measures will reduce fugitive dust emissions primarily during soil movement, g rading and demolition activities, but also during vehicle and equipment movement on unpaved project sites:
a. All active construction areas shall be watered twice daily or more often if necessary. Increased watering frequency shall be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 miles-per-hour. b. Pave, apply water three times daily, or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads and parking and staging areas at construction sites.
c. Cover stockpiles of debris, soil, sand, and any other materials that can be windblown. Trucks transporting these materials shall be covered.
d. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. e. Subsequent to clearing, grading, or excavating, exposed portions of the Site shall be watered, landscaped, treated with soil stabilizers, or covered as soon as possible. f. Installation of sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways.
g. Replanting of vegetation in disturbed areas as soon as possible after completion of construction. h. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes. Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.
i. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. j. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the City of Campbell regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.
10.d
Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Mitigated Negative Declaration ~ 1323 Elam Avenue Page 3 of 4
Mitigation Measure CUL -1: If archaeological or paleontological resources are encountered during excavation or construction, construction personnel shall be inst ructed to immediately suspend all activity in the immediate vicinity of the suspected resources and the City and a licensed archeologist or paleontologist shall be contacted to evaluate the situation. A licensed archeologist or paleontologist shall be ret ained to inspect the discovery and make any necessary recommendations to evaluate the find under current CEQA guidelines prior to the submittal of a resource mitigation plan and monitoring program to the City for review and approval prior to the continuation of any on-site construction activity.
Mitigation Measure GEO -1: The applicant shall comply with the recommendations in the Geotechnical Investigation, dated August 2, 2016 prepared by Kristofer T. Korth, P.E. (No. 82838) and Andrew D. Murray, P.E. (No. C44562) of Murray Engineers. Such recommendations shall be incorporated into the project’s final engineering design to minimize the damage from seismic shaking, unsuitable fill, and other geological deficiencies.
The project shall use standard engineering techniques and conform to the requirements of the International Building Code to reduce the potential for seismic damage and risk to future occupants.
Mitigation Measure HAZ -1: Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, a qualified contractor shall asses the property for presence of Lead -based paint (LBP) and Asbestos containing building materials (ACBM), and if present, prepare a plan, to the satisfaction of the Building Official, to properly manage and dispose of such materials.
Mitigation Measure NOI-1: Windows must have a minimum STC rating of 20 dB, which is met by standard openable double -glazed thermal windows, with two 1/8" lights separated by a 1/2" air space and with good weather seals. For better reduction of loud vehicle noise, an STC performance of 30 STC is recommended, but not required.
Mitigation Measure NOI-2: Outside doors, such as for front entrances or patios, particularly for Unit 1, should meet a tested STC rating of 20 to 30 to match the overall sound transmission mitigation criteria.
Mitigation Measure NOI -3: Mitigation of outside noise is based upon windows that are closed in order to provide the required noise protection. Therefore, all units must have a ventilation system that provides a habitable interior air quality environment with the windows closed, regardless of outside temperature. In addition, noise levels produced by heating and air conditioning units for the project must not themselves create a noise problem for any of the residential units associated with the project or adjacent properties.
Mitigation Measure NOI -4: Good noise design must be implemented by good field construction practices or the design performance will not be achieved. This includes minimizing all penetrations of and connections between party wall and floor/ceiling assemblies, and acoustical sealant around any necessary penetrations.
Mitigation Measure NOI -5: A six to seven-foot solid wood property line fences and gates shall be required to protect back yard activity areas, which will provide the required outdoor activity area noise reduction.
10.d
Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Mitigated Negative Declaration ~ 1323 Elam Avenue Page 4 of 4
PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD
Any person may file a written protest of the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration before 5:00 p.m. on December 7, 2017. Such protest must be filed at the Community Development Departme nt, City Hall, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California. The written protest should make a "fair argument" that the project will have one or more significant effects on the environment based on substantial evidence.
November 16, 2017
Signature Date
Stephen Rose, Associate Planner
City of Campbell
Printed Name Agency
Encl: Initial Study
Draft Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
10.d
Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
INITIAL STUDY
1323 Elam Avenue Subdivision
An environmental evaluation
prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act
Prepared by
Stephen Rose
Associate Planner
City of Campbell
Community Development Department
Planning Division
70 N. First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
Public Review Period
November 17, 2017 – December 7, 2017
10.d
Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Project Overview Page No. 2
I. PROJECT OVERVIEW
Project Title: 1323 Elam Avenue Subdivision
File Number(s): Planned Development Permit (PLN2017-101) Tentative Subdivision Map (PLN2017-102)
Zoning Map Amendment (PLN2017-100)
CEQA Review (PLN2017-103)
Parking Modification Permit (PLN2017-338)
Project Address: 1323 Elam Avenue, Campbell CA 95008
Project Sponsor: Gordana LLC (Attn: Gordana Pavlovic)
602 Hawthorn Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94301
(408) 307-2897
Existing Zoning: R-M (Multiple-Family Residential)
Proposed Zoning: P-D (Planned Development)
General Plan Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units/gr. acre)
Lead Agency: City of Campbell, Community Development Department 70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA 95008
Contact Person: Stephen Rose, Associate Planner
(408) 866-2142 | [email protected]
Date Posted: November 16, 2017
Project Location and Surrounding Land Use : The project site consists of a single parcel located on the north side of Elam Avenue between Inwood Drive and San Tomas Aquino Road. The 18,152 square foot (net area) lot is currently developed with one single -family residence that wi ll be demolished as part of the proposed subdivision. Abutting land uses includ e single-family homes to the east and west, an apartment community to the north, and single -family homes across Elam Avenue to the south. The City of Campbell Zoning Map classifies the project site as R-M (Multiple- Family Residential). The corresponding General Plan Land Use Designation is Low -Medium Density Residential (6-13 units/gr. acre).
Project Description : The project is an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map to allow subdivision of the project site into four single-family residential parcels, ranging from approximately 2,045 to 2,163 square feet in area . The project also includes a common lot consisting of a single private street and driveway for the subdivision, which would take access from Elam Avenue to the south. The private street will be 20 feet wide with an additional 2 foot wide landscape buffer (porous grass pavers) on the east side of the drive aisle. The development will include construction of four two-story single-family residences at a maximum height of 26-feet , 9-inches from natural grade (27- feet from proposed grade) and an average floor area ratio of 47% for the entire development.
10.d
Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Project Overview Page No. 3
Project Data
Gross Lot Area: 20,026.90 square feet (including 2,250 sq. ft. of R.O.W.) Existing Net Lot Area: 18,152 square-feet
Proposed Net Lot Area (after 5-foot dedication):
Lot 1: 3,267.68 square feet
Lot 2: 2,556.84 square feet
Lot 3: 2,556.84 square feet
Lot 4: 2,579.68 square feet
Lot 5: 6,815.86 square feet (common lot; Lot “A” where noted on plans) Total Net Lot Area: 17,776.90 square feet
Proposed Density: 8.71 units/gr. acre (4 units / 0.459 gross acres) Maximum Density Allowed: 13.0 units/gr. acre
Building Height: Less than 27 Feet
Parking: Provided Minimum Required 12 spaces (8 covered/8 assigned) 12 spaces (8 covered/10 assigned)
Note: Minor changes to the project data is expected to occur as p art of the project review process. Parking modification permit required for proposed parking arrangement.
Project Entitlements: Required land use entitlements for the proposed project include a Planned Development Permit (PLN2017-101) for the approval of site configuration, architectural design and to create lots which do not have frontage on a public street , Tentative Subdivision Map (PLN2017-102) to create four single family lots and one commonly owned lot , Zoning Map Amendment (PLN2015-100) to change the zoning from R-M (Multiple-Family Residential) to P- D (Planned Development), Parking Modification P ermit (PLN2017-338) to allow for two of the required assigned/uncovered parking spaces, to be provided as uncovered guest parking.
Other public agencies whose approval is required: None
10.d
Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Project Exhibits – Location Map Page No. 4
Project Location
Figure 1: Regional Setting
Figure 2: Project Site
Project Address: 1323 Elam Avenue, Campbell CA 95008
10.d
Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Project Exhibits – Existing Site Configuration Page No. 5
Existing Site Configuration
10.d
Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Project Overview Page No. 6
Preliminary Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
10.d
Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Project Exhibits – Preliminary Site Plan Page No. 7
Preliminary Site Plan
10.d
Packet Pg. 326
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Project Exhibits – Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan Page No. 8
Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan
10.d
Packet Pg. 327
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Project Exhibits – Preliminary Stormwater Treatment Plan Page No. 9
Preliminary Stormwater Treatment Plan
10.d
Packet Pg. 328
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Project Exhibits – Preliminary Landscaping Plan Page No. 10
Preliminary Landscaping Plan
10.d
Packet Pg. 329
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Overview Page No. 11
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION:
The following evaluation has been prepared to determi ne if the proposed project may result in a “significant impact” on the environment. For the purposes of this study, a significant impact means a substantial or potentially substantial change in the physical environment. The following terms used in the evaluation are defined as specified below:
"Potentially Significant Impact " means that there is either substantial evidence that an effect may be significant or, due to lack of existing information, may have potential to be a significant effect.
"Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" means the incorporation of one or more mitigation measures can reduce the effect from potentially significant to a less than significant level.
"Less Than Significant Impact " means that there is sufficient evidence available to determine that the effect is less than significant and no mitigation is necessary to reduce the impact to a lesser level.
"No Impact" means that the effect does not apply to the proposed project, or clearly will not impact nor be impacted by the project.
A description of the proposed mitigation measures and the factual data or evidence used to reach conclusions regarding impact significance follows each section. The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation " as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. The impacts of the project, as well as a recommended mitigation measures, are summarized in Section II I:
Recommendation and Determination.
1. Aesthetics
2. Agriculture Resources
3. Air Quality
4. Biological Resources
5. Cultural Resources
6. Geology/Soils
7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
8. Hazards & Hazardous Materials
9. Hydrology/Water Quality
10. Land Use/Planning
11. Mineral Resources
12. Noise
13. Population/Housing
14. Public Services
15. Recreation
16. Transportation/Traffic
17. Utilities/Service System
18. Mandatory Findings of Significance
10.d
Packet Pg. 330
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Aesthetics Page No. 12
1. AESTHETICS
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?
(d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Discussion:
(a to c) : The project will alter the existing visual character of the site and its surroundings through demolition of existing structures an d eventual development of a four -unit planned residential development. However, since the project site, nor any area, roadw ay or view-corridor in vicinity of the project site, is a recognized scenic vista or scenic resource, these activities will not result in an adverse environmental affect. Further, the project is subject to various policies and strategies of the Campbell General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance, intended to facilitate development that improves the visual character of the community through good design and site planning through an iterative design review and approval process which takes into account public input. (d): Currently, the project site has very limited lighting associated with the existing single -family residence. New site lighting is anticipated to include down -lit fixtures for new residences and lighting fixtures along the new public pathway. As all ne w lighting is subject to the City’s Lighting Design Standards (CMC Sec. 21.18.090) —which requires lighting to be designed and installed so that light rays are not emitted across property lines —the project would not result in new sources of substantial light or glare.
Mitigation Measures(s): None Required.
10.d
Packet Pg. 331
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Agricultural Resources Page No. 13
2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
(b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
(c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- agricultural use?
Discussion:
(a to c): The project site had historically been used for agricultural production, but is no longer used for, nor zoned for farmland or other agricultural or horticultural purpose. Neither t he project site nor surrounding properties contain farmland or support agricultural activity that could be impacted by the project.
Mitigation Measure(s): None Required.
10.d
Packet Pg. 332
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Air Quality Page No. 14
3. AIR QUALITY
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?
(c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
(d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
Discussion:
(a): The proposed project consists of four (4) single-family residences and would not increase regional population growth or cause changes in vehicle travel that would affect implementation of the Bay Area 2017 Final Clean Air Plan (CAP). Based on BAAQMD criteria (see Enclosure 2) air quality will not be significantly impacted.
(b & c): The BAAQMD's 2017 CEQA Guidelines (BAAQMD, May 2017) make recommendations for evaluation of activities that could impact air quality, including use of thresholds of significance and screening criteria developed by the BAAQMD (BAAQMD, May 2017). The BAAQMD screening levels are based on project size for air pollutant emissions. The applicable land use category from the BAAQMD's screening criteria tables for the project is "single -family." For operational impacts from criteria pollutants, the screening size is 325 dwelling units. For construction impacts, the screening size is 114 units. The project, which consists of four (4) single -family residential units, is well below the BAAQMD significance thresholds for such uses and, therefore, the project would have a less than - significant air quality impact.
Construction activities would generate dust and equipment exhaust on a temporary basis. The BAAQMD identifies best management practices for all projects to limit air quality impacts during construction. The short-term air quality effects during project construction would be avoided with implementation of the measures prescribed by the BAAQMD (see AIR-1).
(d): The BAAQMD defines sensitive receptors as facilities where sensitive receptor population groups (e.g., children, the elderly, the acutely ill and the chronically ill) are likely to be located. These land uses can include residences, hospitals, schools, child-care centers, retirement centers, convalescent homes, and medical clinics. The nearest off-site sensitive receptors include the occupants of multi-unit residential buildings located directly adjacent / proximate to the west, north and east; and the single-family residences across Elam Avenue to the south. Further, an initial air quality screening was performed in August 2017 using BAAQMD online tools and sources and the BAAQMD Significance Determination Flowchart (BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines, May 2017, Figure 1-2, General Steps for Determining Significance of Air Quality Impacts). A total of six (6) potential sources were identified. Five (5) potential roadway sources were identified within 1,000 feet of the Site, as follows:
• Roadway: Elam Avenue.
• Roadway: Westmont Avenue.
10.d
Packet Pg. 333
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Air Quality Page No. 15
• Roadway: Harriet Avenue.
• Roadway: W. San Tomas Aquino Road.
• Roadway: S. San Tomas Aquino Road.
These roadway sources are all significantly below the following BAAQMD’s Thresholds of Significance (BAAQMD, May 2017) for Cancer Risk of 100 in a million; PM2.5 of 0.8 μg/m3 and Hazard Index of 10 (see Enclosure 2 of Exhibit 5). Therefore, there are no significant impacts and no further analysis is needed of the roadway sources.
One (1) potential stationary source was identified, Elite Cleaners (dry cleaner), 128 San Tomas Aquino Road, Campbell, CA. BAAQMD Plant # 3209. However, this stationary source was shut down in 2012 (and was located more than 1,000 feet from the Site).
Further, in consideration of ambient air quality conditions, the project site is located outside of an ‘impacted area’ as identified in the BAAQMD CARE (Community Air Risk Evaluation) Program Report
and therefore does not require further analysis to reduce potential health impacts to future residents.
(e): No element of construction or normal activities associated with single-family residences would result in creation of objectionable odors.
Mitigation Measure(s):
AIR – 1: The project applicant shall ensure that construction plans include the BAAQMD Best Management Practices for fugitive dust control. The following will be required for all construction activities within the project area. These measures will reduce fugitive dust emissions primarily during soil movement, grading and demolition activities, but also during vehicle and equipment movement on unpaved project sites:
a. All active construction areas shall be watered twice daily or more often if necessary. Increased watering frequency shall be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 miles-per-hour. b. Pave, apply water three times daily, or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads and parking and staging areas at construction sites.
c. Cover stockpiles of debris, soil, sand, and any other materials that can be windblown. Trucks transporting these materials shall be covered.
d. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. e. Subsequent to clearing, grading, or excavating, exposed portions of the Site shall be watered, landscaped, treated with soil stabilizers, or covered as soon as possible. f. Installation of sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways. g. Replanting of vegetation in disturbed areas as soon as possible after completion of construction.
10.d
Packet Pg. 334
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Air Quality Page No. 16
h. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes. Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.
i. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation.
j. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the City of Campbell regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.
10.d
Packet Pg. 335
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Biological Resource Page No. 17
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
(b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
(c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
(d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
(e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Discussion:
(a to d): According to the California Natural Diversity Database and the City’s General Plan, no species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special st atus species, or habitat for such species are known to occupy the project site.
(e) The applicant shall be required to provide a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which conforms to the City’s Water Efficient Landscaping Standards (WELS). The landscap ing will be designed to minimize irrigation and runoff, and promote surface infiltration where appropriate. The project is not proposing the removal of any trees . The applicant has proposed to install twenty -one (21) new 15- gallon trees
1 as part of a compr ehensive landscaping plan that would also include a combination of new shrubs and groundcover. Therefore, the project will incur a less than significant impact. (f): No adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or approved loca l, regional or state habitat conservation plans apply to the project or the project site.
Mitigation Measure(s): None Required.
1 Not including three 24-inch box trees in the public right of way. The San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan requires at least one tree for every 2,000 square feet of net lot area (17,777 / 2,000 = 8.8 ~ 9 trees required).
10.d
Packet Pg. 336
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Cultural Resource Page No. 18
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5?
(b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
(c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
(d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
Discussion:
(a): The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment prepared for the project identified the historic of use of the property as agricultural production (orchards) and the most recent use as a house which was constructed circa 1945 (the original sewer connection permit was i ssued in 1960) . Previous known uses would be associated with indigenous populations with no recorded records. As a result, no archaeological or other cultural resources are known to exist on the project site. If archaeological, paleontological, or cultural resources or human remains are discovered, a standard City Condition of Approval will require proper handling of any discovered archeological or paleontological resources, per General Plan Strategy CNR-1.1b.
Archaeological Resources : In accordance with CE QA and the State Public Resources Code, require the discontinuation of all work in the immediate vicinity and the preparation of a resource mitigation plan and monitoring program by a licensed archaeologist if archaeological resources are found on any sites within the City.
Should human remains be discovered during excavation or construction, such remains shall be handled pursuant to § 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and § 5097.94 of the California Public Resources Code. Specifically, in the event a human burial or skeletal element is identified during excavation or construction, work in that location shall stop immediately until the find can be properly treated. The Santa Clara County Coroner shall be notified and shall make a determination as to whether remains are Native American in origin and take such actions as required by law.
Mitigation Measures(s):
CUL – 1: If archaeological or paleontological resources are encountered during excavation or construction, construction personnel shall be instructed to immediately suspend all activity in the immediate vicinity of the suspected resources and the City and a licensed archeologist or paleontologist shall be contacted to evaluate the situation. A licensed archeologist or paleontologist shall be retained to inspect the discovery and make any necessary recommendations to evaluate the find under current CEQA guidelines prior to the submittal of a resource mitigation plan and monitoring program to the City for review and approval prior to the continuation of any on-site construction activity.
10.d
Packet Pg. 337
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Geology and Soils Page No. 19
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a)
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides?
(b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
(d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
(f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature?
Discussion:
(a): The project site is located within the seismically active San Francisco Bay Area. According to maps prepared under the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Act, there are no zoned active faults within the City of Campbell. Therefore, ground rupture is not likely to occur at the site. The nearest major earthquake faults are the Monte Vista Shannon Fault, San Andreas Fault, the Hayward -Rogers Creek Fault and t he Calaveras Fault, all of which pose the greatest earthquake threat because of their high quake potential. The project will likely be subjected to at least one moderate to severe earthquake that will cause moderate to severe ground shaking during the useful life of the building. Because construction practices in the State of California — pursuant to the California Building Code — take into account that earthquakes could potentially damage buildings, they are designed to withstand moderate ground- shaking, resulting in a less than significant impact.
In regard to liquefaction, the geotechnical evaluation concluded that the potential for liquefaction of the site is low, and that while the northerly portion of the project site i s located in an area of “ historic occurrence of liquefaction, or local geological, geotechnical, and ground water conditions indicate potential for permanent ground displacements such that mitigation as defined in PRCS 2693 (c) would be required” the site would be suitable for the proposed i mprovements with the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures. Most notably, U nit 4 will be required to be built on a drilled pier and grade beam foundation, instead of being built on conventional spread footing foundations. (b): The project does not involve any grading, which would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil.
10.d
Packet Pg. 338
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Geology and Soils Page No. 20
(c): According to the Santa Clara County Geologic Hazard Zones Map, the project site is not geologically unstable and would not pose a risk of landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse.
(d): A Geotechnical Investigation report prepared for this project evaluated the geotechnical conditions of the site. The review included four CPTs and 3 soil probes were advanced in the area of the proposed improvements to a maximum depth of approximately 30 feet. Based on the results of the investigation the subject site was determined to be geotechnical suitable for the proposed development. With incorporation of Mitigation Measure GEO- 1 —requiring compliance with all measures identified by the geotechnical report —the project would not be located soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project.
(e): The project would not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems. (f): As discussed in Section 5 (Cultural Resources), no unique paleontological resources or unique geological features are known to exist on the project site. However, should such resources exist, their disturbance would be a potentially significant impact. Incorporation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 will ensure that in such event, treatment of paleontological resources or unique geological features, would be conducted in an appropriate manner as to preserve their integrity.
Mitigation Measures(s):
GEO – 1: The applicant shall comply with the recommendations in the Geotechnical Investigation, dated August 2, 2016 prepared by Kristofer T. Korth, P.E. (No. 82838) and Andrew D. Murray, P.E. (No. C44562) of Murray Engineers . Such r ecommendations shall be incorporated into the project’s final engineering design to minimize the damage from seismic shaking, unsuitable fill, and other geological deficien cies. The project shall use standard engineering techniques and conform to the requirements of the International Building Code to reduce the potential for seismic damage and risk to future occupants.
10.d
Packet Pg. 339
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Page No. 21
7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant effect on the environment?
(b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Discussion:
(a): The BAAQMD thresholds of significance and screening crit eria also apply to greenhouse gases.
For greenhouse gas impacts, the screening size for single -family residences is 56 dwelling units. The project, which consists of four (4) single -family residential units, is well below the BAAQMD greenhouse gases thresh old of significance for single -family residential land use, and thus the project would have a less-than-significant air quality impact with regards to greenhouse gases.
(b): The City of Campbell has not adopted a Climate Action Plan or any comparable poli cy or regulation pertaining to the reduction or monitoring of greenhouse gases.
Mitigation Measure(s): None Required.
10.d
Packet Pg. 340
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Hazards and Hazardous Materials Page No. 22
8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? (b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
(c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
(d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
(e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
(f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
(h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Discussion:
(a and b): No routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials would be associated with the project. A slight hazardous potential would exist during the demolition of the existing home (w hich was built in 1979 and therefor e may have lead or asbestos) and project construction when materials and construction equipment are at the site; however, long -term hazard risk is very low. With incorporation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 , which requires qualified contractors assess the presence of the lead and asbestos in order to property manage and dispose of such materials, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment.
Hazard risks during construction would be regulated by the City’s standard conditions of approval and will be required to be performed in accordance with state and federal haz ardous materials regulations and current Best Management Practices (BMP’s) for construction activities. The use of toxic chemicals for landscaping (pesticides, herbicides, etc.) will not be above what is generally required for landscape maintenance and is not considered significant.
(c): The project site is within ½ mile of the Good Soil Baptist Church (which offers Sunday School) , located southwest of the project site. However, the operation of the project will not include hazardous emission or handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances. Further, as discussed in Section 3 (Air Quality), construction and demolition related air pollutants that may constitute a hazard are regulated through Best Management Practices as required by City Ordinances and reiterated through Mitigation Measure AIR – 1.
10.d
Packet Pg. 341
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Hazards and Hazardous Materials Page No. 23
(d): The project site is not listed on the Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List (available at http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese_List.cfm) compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, therefore it would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.
Further the site is not listed as a past or present case (or informational item) on the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker website (
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/).
(e to f): The project site is not located within the Santa Clara County Airport Land Use Commission jurisdiction, within two miles of a public airport or within the vicinity of a private airstrip. (g): The project would not interfere with emergency response or evacuation plans. Sufficient emergency access and emergency services staff would be provided for the project site in compliance with the State of California Building Code Standards and requirements of the Santa Clara County Fire and Health Departments.
(h): The project site is not located near any wildland areas and would not cause an increase in wildl and fire hazard.
Mitigation Measure(s):
HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, a qualified contractor shall asse ss the property for presence of Lead -based paint (LBP) and Asbestos containing building materials (ACBM), and if present, prepare a p lan, to the satisfaction of the Building Official, to properly manage and dispose of such materials.
10.d
Packet Pg. 342
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Hydrology and Water Quality Page No. 24
9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?
(b) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site.
(c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
(d) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm?
(e) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas?
(f) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
(g) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
(h) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
(i) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?
(j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
(k) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
(l) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from construction activities? (m) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from post-construction activities? (n) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas?
(o) Result in the potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters?
(p) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?
Discussion:
(a and b): The project will be adequately served by existing water supplies, and will be served by the local area water utility as confirmed in written correspondence (“will serve” letter) by the S an Jose Water Company. No violations of any water quality standards are expected from the project. The project would not directly deplete groundwater supplies (no wells) or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge (the project is evaluated for the amount of proposed pervious and impervious area to maintain or improve upon existing conditions) such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level.
10.d
Packet Pg. 343
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Hydrology and Water Quality Page No. 25
(c to g): No significant increase in impervious surface area of the lot would result from the project.
However, all additional runoff would be conveyed into the public storm drain system. These changes to the Project site would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the area due to the small size of the site. Storm water would be conveyed into the public storm drain system. The course of streams or rivers would not be affected by the proposed Project. The runoff from construction of the proposed Project would not exceed the capac ity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems, provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, or substantially degrade water quality.
(h and i): The entire Project site is located in Flood Zone X, according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Flood Zone X is defined as an areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.
(j and k): The Project site is located downstream of Lexington Reservoir, in an area defined by the Association of Bay Area Governments as a dam failure inundation area. However, the project is only would not expose any additional people or structures to a new significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding. Furthermore, as the project is not modifying flood protection measures or creating a condition where adjacent properties are exposed to a new significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, no additional exposure to water -related hazards is expected as a result of the project construction or operation.
(l): As discussed in Section 3 (Air Quality), construction and demolition activities are regulated through Best Management Practices as required by City ordinances and reiterated by Mitigation Measure AIR – 1, which is designed to limit air and water contamination related to construction activity. With the implementation of this measure, as well as Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 which requires qualified contractors assess the presence of the lead and asbestos in order to property manage and dispose of such materials, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment.
(n): The proj ect will not include uses that would include vehicle fueling, waste handling, hazardous material storage, or other outdoor work areas that could result in the potential discharge of stormwater pollutants.
(o and p): The Project had been reviewed for compl iance with Provision C.3 of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and had been determined to be below the required thresholds to trigger pollution prevention measures. Furthermore, as the project site does not include any material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance, waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks, or other outdoor work areas, the project would not violate any water quality standards as it woul d not result in the potential for stormwater pollutants.
Mitigation Measure(s): None Required.
10.d
Packet Pg. 344
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Land Use and Planning Page No. 26
10. LAND USE and PLANNING
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Physically divide an established community?
(b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
(c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan?
Discussion:
(a): Projects that have the potential to physically divide an establishe d community typically include construction that would eliminate formal or informal travel ways through a property. No such pathways or other forms of informal access through the project site currently exist. Therefore, the project would not physically divide an established community.
(b): The Campbell General Plan Land Use Element Diagram and Campbell Zoning Map designate the project site as Medium Density Residential (less than 6 -13 units/gr. acre) and R-M (Multiple-Family Residential), respectively. The Project would result in the creation of four residential parcels, and a common lot, at an approximate densit y 8.71 units per gross acre and rezone the property to P -D (Planned Development) which allows for residential development within this density range. As such, the proposed subdivision would be consistent with the City of Campbell General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
(c): No habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plans are applicable to the project site.
Mitigation Measure(s): None Required.
10.d
Packet Pg. 345
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Mineral Resources Page No. 27
11. MINERAL RESOURCES
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
(b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Discussion:
(a to b): No known mineral resources are present at the project site.
Mitigation Measure(s): None Required.
10.d
Packet Pg. 346
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Noise Page No. 28
12. NOISE
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
(b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
(c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
(d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
(f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
Discussion:
(a to b): The City's Noise Ordinance (CMC Sec. 21.16.070.E) provides the following noise exposure standards for new residential development:
• Noise from stationary sources. New residential development shall conform to a stationary source noise exposure standard of 65 dBA for exterior noise levels and 45 dBA for interior noise levels. • Traffic-related noise. New residential development shall conform to a traffic-related noise exposure standard of 60 dBA CNEL for outdoor noise in noise-sensitive outdoor activity areas and 45 dBA CNEL for indoor noise.
To verify compliance, an acoustical study was conducted for the site which determined that based upon site noise measurements, present and anticipated future traffic volumes, and traffic noise modeling, a worst-case Design Noise Level for Unit 1 (closest to Elam Avenue) is 63 dBA, and that because of the location and site orientation, traffic noise impacts would be less at the other three properties (Units 2 through 4). The report goes on to state that although these sites have relatively low CNEL, to better mitigate peak noise incidents from traffic, such as trucks and motorcycles, an additional 12 dBA of protection is recommended, but not required. Based on the results of the investigation the subject site would satisfy the noise requirements for the proposed development, with the incorporation of Mitigation Measures NOI-1 through NOI-5.
(c): Single-Family residences are classified as sensitive receptors of noise, and to this extent do not themselves generate noise of any appreciable level. As such, the project would not result in increase in ambient noise within the vicinity of the project site.
(d): Construction of single -family residences that will eventually result from th e project will temporarily increase ambient noise levels in the project vicinity. However, future construction is governed by CMC Sec. 18.04.052, which limits construction activity from 8 AM to 5 PM., Monday through Friday, 9 AM to 4 PM on Saturday, and pr ohibits construction on Sunday or National Holidays. Additionally, loud environmentally disruptive noise over 50 dBA (e.g., air compressors without mufflers, continuously running motors or generators, loud playing musical instruments or
10.d
Packet Pg. 347
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Noise Page No. 29
radios) is prohibit ed. As such, temporary ambient noise level increases associated with construction will be less than significant.
(e and f): The project is not located within the vicinity of an airport land use plan or within two miles of an airport. The project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip.
Mitigation Measure(s):
NOI-1: Windows must have a minimum STC rating of 20 dB, which is met by standard openable double -glazed thermal windows, with two 1/8" lights separated by a 1/2" air space and with good weather seals. For better reduction of loud vehicle noise, an STC performance of 30 STC is recommended, but not required.
NOI-2: Outside doors, such as for front entrances or patios, particularly for Unit 1, should meet a tested STC rating of 20 t o 30 to match the overall sound transmission mitigation criteria.
NOI-3: Mitigation of outside noise is based upon windows that are closed in order to provide the required noise protection. Therefore, all units must have a ventilation system that provides a habitable interior air quality environment with the windows closed, regardless of outside temperature. In addition, noise levels produced by heating and air conditioning units for the project must not themselves create a noise problem for any of the residential units associated with the project or adjacent properties.
NOI-4: Good noise design must be implemented by good field construction practices or the design performance will not be achieved. This includes minimizing all penetrations of and connections between party wall and floor/ceiling assemblies, and acoustical sealant around any necessary penetrations.
NOI-5: A 6 to 7- foot solid wood property line fences and gates shall be required to protect back yard activity areas, which will provide the r equired outdoor activity area noise reduction.
10.d
Packet Pg. 348
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Population and Housing Page No. 30
13. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
(b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
(c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Discussion:
(a): The p roject will eventually re sult in the construction of four single-family residential units on a property identified by the Campbe ll General Plan Housing Element as being suitable and appropriate for housing. The introduction of four single-family residences in a predominantly developed residential neighborhood represents only a nominal increase of population growth. There is no for eseeable indirect population growth associated with the project. The infrastructure provided to service the project site is designed to serve only the proposed residential units.
(b and c): The project will require the demolition of the existing residenc e that has been vacated, and build four new residential units. Therefore the Project will not result in the displacement of any people or housing units, which would necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.
Mitigation Measure(s): None Required.
10.d
Packet Pg. 349
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Public Services Page No. 31
14. PUBLIC SERVICES
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
i) Fire Protection?
ii) Police Protection?
iii) Schools?
iv) Parks?
v) Other public facilities?
Discussion:
(a): The project will require public services such as fire, police services, schools, open space, and street maintenance, commensurate with the scale of the project. The County Fire District, Campbell Police Department, City stakeholder agencies, and area school districts reviewed the project and determined services could be provided at an acceptable level. Existing parkland is sufficient to serve the residents of the project, as discus sed in Section 15 (Recreation) and the developer will be required t o pay park fees for the creation of new residential units less a credit for the removal of an existing unit.
Mitigation Measure(s): None Required.
10.d
Packet Pg. 350
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Recreation Page No. 32
15. RECREATION
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
(b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
Discussion:
(a): Residents of the project are likely to access Jack Fisher Park located roughly half a mile south of the project site , or San Tomas Park located roughly half a mile north of the project site . Due to the limited scope and scale of the project, only a nominal increase in the use of City and regional parks and other recreational facilities can be expected as a result of the project. (b): The project does not any include recreational facilities.
Mitigation Measure(s): None Required.
10.d
Packet Pg. 351
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Transportation and Traffic Page No. 33
16. TRANSPORTATION and TRAFFIC
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
(b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?
(c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e. g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
(f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
(g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Discussion:
(a and b): A trip generation analysis bas ed on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, prepared by the City Traffic Engineer anticipates that the project (net) wo uld result in a an average of 27 daily trips, including 2 AM peak hour (7:00 – 9:00) outbound trips and 2 PM peak hour (4:00 – 6:00) inbound trips. This nominal increase in trips would not result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at area intersections.
Net Project Trips
Land Use Qty. Units AM Peak PM Peak
Total Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound ADT ITE CODE Existing Unit
(1 Removed) -1 DU -1 0 -1 -1 -1 0 -9 210
Proposed Unit
(5 Added) 4 DU 3 1 2 4 3 1 38 210
Net Trips 3 DU 2 1 1 3 2 1 27 10th Ed.
(c): The project will not result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks.
(d): The proposed public roadway is designed consistent with public roadway standards for residential streets as determined by the City Engineer and would not result in hazards due to a design features or incompatible uses.
(e): The project has been designed to comply with emergency access requirements of the Santa Clara Fire De partment. The project plans include an emergency vehicle access plan that illustrates compliance with said standards. The County Fire Department has reviewed the project during the
10.d
Packet Pg. 352
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Transportation and Traffic Page No. 34
City’s department review committee process and will again review the access routes during review of construction drawings.
(f): Anticipated single -family development will be subject to th e City’s parking standard of three spaces per unit (2-designated, 1 guest) , which will result in adequate parking capacity (12 parking spaces for 4 residential units).
(g): The project site is not in vicinity of any light- rail or comparable bus rapid transit (BRT) line (the closest bus stops occur near Burrows Road and Hacienda Avenue to the south) , and as a result is not subject to City policies encouraging alternative transporting solutions (e.g., provision of transit -passes, incorporation of bicycle parking, etc.). Additionally, the City’s adopted requirements for alternative transportation solutions per CMC Sec. 21.28.070 require provision bicycle and clean -air vehicle parking only for non- residential development subject to the Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen). The project, therefore, will not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation.
Mitigation Measure(s): None Required.
10.d
Packet Pg. 353
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Utilities and Service Systems Page No. 35
17. UTILITIES and SERVICE SYSTEMS
Issues
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
(b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment or collection facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
(c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
(d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
(f) Be served by a landfill with insufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs?
(g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid wastes.
Discussion:
(a and b): The project would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board; require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. The West Valley Sanitation District has provided written correspondence (“will serve” letter) which indicates that the sewer facilities are adequate to support the site.
(c): The stormwater runoff generated by the project site would be collected and treated on -site in compliance with Provision C.3 of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements as discussed in Section 9 (Hydrology and Water Quality) and will not require expansion or construction of new stormwater treatment facilities.
(d): The project will be adequately served by the existing water supplies, as confirmed in written correspondence (“will serve” letter) by San Jose Water Company, the local area water utility.
(e): The project would connect to the existing waste water treatment system, which currently has sufficient capacity to receive the additional waste water generated from the proposed project.
Therefore, the project would not impact the ability of the waste water t reatment provider (West Valley Sanitation District) to meet its current commitments for service.
(f to g): Existing capacity at local landfills can accommodate the amount of waste generated as a result of project operation. The project would comply with Federal, State and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste.
Mitigation Measure(s): None Required.
10.d
Packet Pg. 354
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Air Quality Page No. 36
18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
(b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects?)
(c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Discussion:
(a): Based on the findings of the Initial Study , construction and operation of the project, with mitigation, would not substantially degrade the quality the environment; reduce the habitat, population, or range of species; nor eliminate important examples of California history or prehistory.
(b): Based on the findings of this Initial Study, the project w ould not have individual or cumulative environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level.
(c): Based on the findings of the Initial Study, there is no evidence to demonstrate that the project would cause a substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
Mitigation Measure(s): None Required.
10.d
Packet Pg. 355
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Air Quality Page No. 37
III. RECOMMENDATION and DETERMINATION
Recommendation: On the basis of this initial evaluation, the following measures are recommended to reduce potentially significant effects on the environment to a less than significant level:
1. Aesthetics: None Required
2. Agricultural Resources: None Required
3. Air Quality:
AIR-1: The project applicant shall ensure that construction plans include the BAAQMD Best Management Practices for fugitive dust control. The following will be required for all construction activities within the project area. These measures will reduce fugitive dust emissions primarily during soil movement, grading and demolition activities, but also during vehicle and equipment movement on unpaved project sites:
a. All active construction areas shall be watered twice daily or more often if necessary.
Increased watering frequency shall be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 miles- per-hour.
b. Pave, apply water three times daily, or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads and parking and staging areas at construction sites. c. Cover stockpiles of debris, soil, sand, and any other materials that can be windblown.
Trucks transporting these materials shall be covered.
d. All visible mud or dirt track- out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.
e. Subsequent to clearing, grading, or excavating, exposed portions of the Site shall be watered, landscaped, treated with soil stabilizers, or covered as soon as possible. f. Installation of sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways.
g. Replanting of vegetation in disturbed areas as soon as possible after completion of construction.
h. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes. Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.
i. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. j. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the City of Campbell regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.
10.d
Packet Pg. 356
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Mandatory Findings of Significance Page No. 38
4. Biological Resources: None Required
5. Cultural Resources:
CUL-1: If archaeological or paleontological resources are encountered during excavation or construction, construction personnel shall be instructed to immediately suspend all activity in the immediate vicinity of the suspected resources and the City and a licensed archeologist or paleontologist shall be contacted to evaluate the situation. A licensed archeologist or paleontologist shall be retained to inspect the discovery and make any necessary recommendations to evaluate the find under current CEQA guidelines prior to the submittal of a resource mitigation plan and monitoring program to the City for review and approval prior to the continuation of any on-site construction activity.
6. Geology and Soils:
GEO-1: The applicant shall comply with the recommendations in the Geotechnical Investigation, dated August 2, 2016 prepared by Kristofer T. Korth, P.E. (No. 82838) and Andrew D. Murray, P.E. (No. C44562) of Murray Eng ineers. Such recommendations shall be incorporated into the project’s final engineering design to minimize the damage from seismic shaking, unsuitable fill, and other geological deficiencies. The project shall use standard engineering techniques and confor m to the requirements of the International Building Code to reduce the potential for seismic damage and risk to future occupants.
7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: None Required
8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials:
HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, a qualified contractor shall asses the property for presence of Lead -based paint (LBP) and Asbestos containing building materials (ACBM), and if present, prepare a plan, to the satisfaction of the Building Official, to properly manage and dispose of such materials.
9. Hydrology and Water Quality: None Required
10. Land Use and Planning: None Required
11. Mineral Resources: None Required
12. Noise:
NOI-1: Windows must have a minimum STC rating of 20 dB, which is met by standard openable double -glazed thermal windows, with tw o 1/8" lights separated by a 1/2" air space and with good weather seals. For better reduction of loud vehicle noise, an STC performance of 30 STC is recommended, but not required.
NOI-2: Outside doors, such as for front entrances or patios, particularly for Unit 1, should meet a tested STC rating of 20 to 30 to match the overall sound transmission mitigation criteria.
NOI-3: Mitigation of outside noise is based upon windows that are closed in order to provide the required noise protection. Therefore, all units must have a ventilation system that provides a habitable interior air quality environment with the windows closed,
10.d
Packet Pg. 357
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Recommendation and Determination Page No. 39
regardless of outside temperature. In addition, noise levels produced by heating and air conditioning units for the project must not t hemselves create a noise problem for any of the residential units associated with the project or adjacent properties.
NOI-4: Good noise design must be implemented by good field construction practices or the design performance will not be achieved. This includes minimizing all penetrations of and connections between party wall and floor/ceiling assemblies, and acoustical sealant around any necessary penetrations.
NOI-5: A six to seven-foot solid wood property line fences and gates shall be required to protect back yard activity areas, which will provide the required outdoor activity area noise reduction.
13. Population and Housing: None Required
14. Public Services: None Required
15. Recreation: None Required
16. Transportation and Traffic: None Required
17. Utilities and Service Systems: None Required
18. Mandatory Findings of Significance: None Required
10.d
Packet Pg. 358
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Recommendation and Determination Page No. 40
Determination: On the basis of this initial evaluation, and incorporation of the recommended mitigation measures into the project design:
1. I find that the project could not have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
2. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
3. I find the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
4. I find that the proposed project may have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated impact” on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
5. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Negati ve Declaration pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Stephen Rose
PROJECT PLANNER
Associate Planner
TITLE
City of Campbell
AGENCY
_____________________________ November 16, 2017
SIGNATURE DATE
10.d
Packet Pg. 359
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
Environmental Impact Evaluation – Reference Materials Page No. 41
IV. REFERENCE MATERIALS
Exhibits (May be viewed at http://www.cityofcampbell.com/General/PublicNotices.htm):
1. Geotechnical Investigation by Murray Engineers Inc., dated August 2, 2016.
2. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment by IRC Environmental Consulting, dated November 15, 2016.
3. Noise Environmental Evaluation & Design Recommendations by Stan Shelly of Environmental Consulting Services, dated November 18, 2016
4. Will Serve Letters (WVSD, Campbell Union School District, PG&E, & San Jose Water)
5. Air Quality Screening Evaluation by IRC Environmental Consult ing, dated September 11, 2017
Reference Documents:
1. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). (Adopted) April 19, 2017. Final 2017 Clean Air Plan (CAP).
2. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). May 2017. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. Table 2- 1. Air Quality CEQ A Thresholds of Significance. (Including Risk and Hazards for new sources and receptors).
3. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). Accessed online in November 2017. Tools and Methodologies, B AAQMD CEQA Air Quality Risks and Hazards Analysis Tools. (various online risks and hazards screening analysis tools) (Primary Webpage [with links to various online screening tools]. http://www.baaqmd.gov/plans-and- climate/california-environmental-quality-act-ceqa/ceqa-tools (accessed online).
4. Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List.
http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese_List.cfm (accessed online)
5. State Water Resource Control Board: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ (accessed online)
6. State of California, Seismic Hazard Zones Map, San Jose West Quadrangle, February 7, 2002. http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/shzp (accessed online)
7. California Natural Diversity Database, 2000.
8. CEQA Guidelines, 2017 version. http://www.califaep.org/images/ceqa/statute- guidelines/2017/CEQA_Handbook_2017_with_covers.pdf (accessed online)
9. City of Campbell General Plan.
10. City of Campbell Zoning Code.
10.d
Packet Pg. 360
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
EXHIBIT 1
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
10.d
Packet Pg. 361
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
ZHU RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
1323 ELAM AVENUE
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
THIS REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR
YAN HUA ZHU
1830 GUINDA STREET
PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94303
JULY 2016
10.d
Packet Pg. 362
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
935 Fremont Avenue, Los Altos, CA 94024 110 Tiburon Boulevard, M ill Valley, CA 94941
August 2, 2016
Project No. 2534-1R1
Yan Hua Zhu
1830 Guinda Street
Palo Alto, 94303
RE: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION,
ZHU RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT,
1323 ELAM AVENUE,
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We are pleased to present the results of our ge otechnical investigation relating to the 4-lot residential development and associated improvements on the property at 1323 Elam Avenue in Campbell, California. This report summarizes the results of our field, laboratory, geologic and engineering evaluations, and presents conclusions and recommendations concerning the geologic and geotechnical engineering aspects of the project.
The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon our review and approval of the project plans and our observation and testing of the geotechnical aspects of the construction.
If you have any questions concerning our investigation, please call.
Sincerely,
MURRAY ENGINEERS, INC.
Kristofer T. Korth, P.E. Andrew D. Murray, P.E.
Senior Engineer Principal Engineer
AK:KTK:AM
Copies: Addressee (2)
Gordana Design Studio LLC (4)
Attn: Gordana Pavlovic
10.d
Packet Pg. 363
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
Cover Page
Letter of Transmittal
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................1 Project Description .................................................................................................1 Scope of Services ....................................................................................................1 GEOLOGIC & SEISMIC CONDITIONS ....................................................................2 Geologic Overview .................................................................................................2 Faulting & Seismicity ..............................................................................................2 HISTORIC CHANNEL BACKFILL EVALUATION ..................................................3 SITE EXPLORATION & RECONNAISSANCE .........................................................3 Exploration Program ..............................................................................................3 Cone Penetration Tests ...........................................................................................4 Site Description ......................................................................................................5 Subsurface ..............................................................................................................5 Groundwater ..........................................................................................................6 LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS & FINDINGS ..............................................................6 Seismic-Induced Liquefaction Settlement ................................................................7 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................9 Geologic Hazards ...................................................................................................9 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................10 2013 CBC EARTHQUAKE DESIGN PARAMETERS ......................................11 FOUNDATIONS ................................................................................................11 Drilled Pier & Grade Beam ..........................................................................11 Spread Footings ...........................................................................................12 CONCRETE SLABS ...........................................................................................13 Structural Slabs .............................................................................................14 Slabs-on-Grade ............................................................................................14 Vapor Retarder Considerations ....................................................................15 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS ..................................................................................15 Asphaltic Concrete .......................................................................................15 Sand Set Pavers or Flagstones ......................................................................16 EARTHWORK ....................................................................................................16 Clearing & Site Preparation ..........................................................................16 Material for Fill ............................................................................................16 Compaction ..................................................................................................17 Final Slopes ..................................................................................................17 Temporary Slopes & Trench Excavations ....................................................18 SITE DRAINAGE ..............................................................................................18 REQUIRED FUTURE SERVICES .............................................................................18 Plan Review ..........................................................................................................18 Construction Observation Services .......................................................................19 LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................19 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................21
10.d
Packet Pg. 364
Attachment: Prior CEQA Documents (1323 Elam Avenue)