City Council Agenda
City of Campbell, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California
NOTE: To protect our constituents, City officials, and City staff, the City requests all members of the public follow the guidance of the California Department of Health Servi ces', and the County of Santa Clara Health Officer Order, to help control the spread of COVID -19. Additional information regarding COVID-19 is available on the City's website at www.campbellca.gov.
This City Council Regular meeting will be conducted in person as well as telecommunication and is compliant with provisions of the Brown Act. *Councilmember Furtado will attend virtually from 405 W. Latimer Avenue, Campbell, CA 95008. A quorum of the City Council will be in attendance at the Campbell City Hall Council Chambers.
The City Council meeting will be live -streamed on Channel 26 or Channel 88, the City's website and on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/CityofCampbell for those who only wish to view the meeting.
Those members of the public wishing to provide public comment virtually are asked to register in advance at: https://www.campbellca.gov/signup. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting. Members of the public may attend the meeting in person at Campbell City Hall - Council Chambers.
Public comment will also be accepted via email a t [email protected] prior to the start of the meeting. Written comments will be posted on the website and distributed to the Council. If you choose to email your comments, please indicate in the subject line “FOR PUBLIC COMMENT” and indicate the item number.
AMENDED AGENDA – To reflect the virtual participation location of Councilmember Furtado *Denotes revised item
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CAMPBELL CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, March 21, 2023 7:30 p.m.
City Hall Council Chamber – 70 N. First Street
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS
1. Proclamation Declaring th e Month of March 2023 as “American Red Cross Month” in the City of Campbell
Recommended Action: That the City Council proclaim the month o f March 2023 as “American Red Cross Month” in the City of Campbell.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
• Email from Jeff Cristina
ORAL REQUESTS
NOTE: This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the City Council on any matter not on the agenda. Persons wishing to address the Council are requested, but not required to complete a Speaker’s Card. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes. The law generally prohibits the Council from discussion or taking action on such items. However, the Council may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Requests.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTE: All matters listed under consent calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a request is made by a member of City Council, City staff, or a member of the public.
Any person wishing to speak on any item on the consent calendar should ask to have the item removed from the consent calendar prior to the time the Council votes to approve. If removed, the item will be discussed in the order in which it appears.
2. Minutes of City Council Executive Session Meeting of March 7, 2023 Recommended Action: Approve the executive session meeting minutes of March 7, 2023.
3. Minutes of City Council Regular Meeting of March 7, 2023 Recommended Action: Approve the regular meeting minutes of March 7, 2023.
4. Approving Bills and Claims
Recommended Action: Approve the bills and claims in the amount of $1,556,489.07.
5. Agreement with the Santa Clara County for the Senior Nutrition Program Home and Community Based Services Infrastructure Funding for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the FY 2022- 23 Senior Nutrition Program Congregate Meals- HCBS Infrastructure Funding Agreement with the County in the amount of $44,322 and approve a budget adjustment to the Senior Nutrition Program budget (101.525) to recognize and appropriate grant funds.
6. Approval of a Used Car Dealer Permit for Silicon Valley Enthusiast LLC (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the issuance of a Used Car Dealer Permit to sell used cars at 3293 S. Winchester Boulevard.
7. Authorization to Submit a Climate Adaptation Planning Grant Application (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a Resolution a uthorizing the Community Development D irector to apply for a Cl imate Adaptation Planning Grant for a Climate Action Plan.
8. Authorization to Award Contract and Execute Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project (CIP No. 22-OO) (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to award the contract to and execute the consultant services agreement with Alta Planning + D esign, Inc. for the Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES
NOTE: Members of the public may be allotted up to two (2) minutes to comment on any public hearing item. Applicants/Appellants and their representatives may be allotted up to a total of five (5) minutes for opening statements and up to a total of three (3) minutes maximum for closing statements. Items requested/recommended for continuance are subject to Council’s consent at the meeting.
9. Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the Planning Commission’s Approval of a Variance for Property Located at 68 Page Street to Allow Construction of an Approximately 1,053 Square -Foot One -Story Single - Family Dwelling, Inclusive of a 313 Square- Foot Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU), with a 529 Square- Foot Atta ched Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU), with Substandard Front- and Street-Side Setbacks (14 ½ -Ft and 3-Ft Respectively), Including Retention of an Existing Detached Non - Conforming Garage. File No.: PLN-2022-101. (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Recommended Actio n: That the City Council adopt a resol ution denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's approval of a Variance.
10. Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance to Extend Interim Ordinance N o. 2291 that Adopted Urgency Revisions to Title 21 Relat ed to Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwel ling Units (JADUs) to Conform with Recent State Legislation (AB -2221 and SB -897). (Ordinance/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: It is recommended that City Council adopt an ordinance to extend Interim Ordinance No. 2291 to June 30, 2023.
11. Authorization of the Semi -Permanent Parklet Grant Program Per Section 53083 (A)(6)(B) of the Government Code (AB 562 ) (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a Resol ution determining findings for the City’s Semi-Permanent Parklet Grant Program are consistent with Section 53083 (a)(6)(b) of the Government Code. (AB 562)
NEW BUSINESS
12. Review of Campbell Statement of Values
Recommended Action: That the City Council review Campbell’s Statement of Values and reaffirm it with any desired adjustments.
13. Code of Conduct Policy for Boards and Commissions
Recommended Action: Consider adoption of a Code of Conduct Policy for City Boards and Commissions.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
14. Adoption of Fiscal Year 2024 City Council Priorities Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt the proposed Fiscal Year 2024 City Council Priorities.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
15. Council Committee Reports
Recommended Action: That the City Council report on activities from their committee assignments.
ADJOURN
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agend a packet are available for public inspection with the agenda packet in the lobby of City Clerk’s Office, 70 N. First Str eet, Campbell, CA 95008, during normal business hours. These materials will also be available on the City website at https://www.ci.campbell.ca.us/agendacenter with the agenda packet following the last item of the agenda, subject to staff’s ability to post the documents prior to the meeting. All documents not posted prior to the meeting will be posted the next business day.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, listening assistive devices are available for all meetings held in the City Council Chambers. If you require accommodation, please contact the City Clerk’s Office, (408) 866-2117, at least one week in advance of the meeting.
City
Council
Report
TITLE: Proclamation Declaring the Month of March 2023 as “American Red Cross Month” in the City of Campbell
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council proclaim the month of March 2023 as “American Red Cross Month” in the City of Campbell.
BACKGROUND
March was first proclaimed as Red Cross Month in 1943 by President Franklin D.
Roosevelt as a way to raise awareness of the organization and its h umanitarian mission in the midst of war. Since then, every United States President has designated March as Red Cross Month. The American Red Cross is synonymous with helping people and has been doing so for over 140 years.
American Red Cross was establish ed as a humanitarian organization, guided by seven fundamental principles—including humanity, impartiality, and independence—to provide services to those in need regardless of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation , or citizenship status. Today, the Am erican Red Cross is one of the largest humanitarian organizations in the world. It delivers its mission every day to prevent and alleviate human suffering in the face of emergencies by mobilizing the power of volunteers and the generosity of doners . A workforce consisting of over 90% volunteers that serves to help those affected by disasters emergencies such as : local house fires, wildfires, national hurricanes, the COVID -19 Pandemic , and more. Additionally, the Red Cross aspires to help all members of our armed services and their families find support and comfort whenever needed and ensure everyone in our country has access to safe, lifesaving blood and blood products.
DISCUSSION
Locally, the Silicon Valley Chapter of the American Red Cross has a long hi story of helping our neighbors in need by deploying Red Cross trained responders all over the U.S. to deliver shelter, care, and hope during disasters . Not only by providing lifesaving blood to those in need but through programs such as the Home Fire Campa ign, the American Red Cross helps residents, military, veterans, and their families.
Item: 1
Category: SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
AND PROCLAMATIONS
Meeting Date: March 21, 2023
1 Packet Pg. 5
Proclamation Declaring the Month of March “American Red Cross Month” in the City of Campbell Page 2 of 2
More recently, in January w hen winter storms devastated families in communities nearby, the local Red Cross volunteers were there to help by addressing their urgent needs like food, lodging and recovery support.
March is American Red Cross Month, a time to recognize the humanitarian organization that eases people’s suffering during life’s emergencies in the City of Campbell , across the United States, and around the world . This proclamation would designate the month of March as America n Red Cross Month throughout the City of Campbell . It would support, honor, and celebrate the everyday heroes who donate their time, money, and blood to fulfill the mission of the American Red Cross.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
Prepared by:
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk
Approved by:
Angelique Gaeta, Assistant City
Manager
Attachment:
a. Proclamation - Red Cross 2023
1 Packet Pg. 6
PROCLAMATION OF THE
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL
WHEREAS, March is American Red Cross Month, a time when we recognize the humanitarian organization that eases people’s suffering during life’s emergencies in the City of Campbell, across the United States and around the world; and
WHEREAS, the Silicon Valley Chapter of the American Red Cross has a long history of helping our neighbors in need by deploying Red Cross trained responders all over the US to deliver shelter, care, and hope during disasters; and
WHEREAS, the American Red Cross is making our community safer through its lifesaving Home Fire Campaign; providing lifesaving blood; teaching skills that save lives; and supporting military, veterans, and their families; and
WHEREAS, the City of Campbell would like to remember our heroes who help people in need and work tirelessly to assist their neighbors when they need a helping hand; and
WHEREAS, during this Red Cross Month, we thank and honor the selfless volunteers, dedicated employees and generous supporters who make this compassionate work possible; and
WHEREAS, Red Cross volunteers adapted their service delivery to keep everyone safe during the COVID-19 Pandemic; and
WHEREAS, This January when the winter storms devastated families in communities nearby, the local Red Cross volunteers were there to help by addressing their urgent needs like food, lodging and recovery support; and
WHEREAS, every day, people in our community depend on the American Red Cross, whose lifesaving mission is powered by the devotion of volunteers, generosity of donors and partnership of community organizations; and
WHEREAS, the City of Campbell dedicates the month of March to all those who support the American Red Cross mission; to prevent and alleviate human suffer ing in the face of emergencies.
NOW, THEREFORE , I, Anne Bybee Mayor of the City of Campbell, do hereby proclaim March 2023 as American Red Cross Month. I encourage all Americans to support this organization and its noble humanitarian mission.
WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF THE CITY OF CAMP BELL this 21st day of March 2023.
___________________________________
Anne Bybee
Mayor of the City of Campbell
1.a
Packet Pg. 7
Attachment: Proclamation - Red Cross 2023 (Proclamation Declaring the Month of March “American Red Cross Month” in the City of Campbell) From: Jeffrey Cristina
To: Clerks Office
Subject: Desk item for next council meeting
Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 9:41:24 PM
WARNING: This email originated from an external sender! Please do not open attachments or click on links unless you are certain it is legitimate.
________________________________
Campbell City Council,
As my house has been without power for about 12hrs and the day turned into a cold night, I would like to make a plea.
Please retract or stop your ban on natural gas usage. as I am building an ADU currently and will only have an electric heater and electric stove top I wouldn’t be able to eat a warm meal tonight or stay warm. Please rethink this and review this at a later date when we have the stable infrastructure to support this ban. The idea is great and something to move towards. We just aren’t there yet and it clearly proven when your policy makes people sit in their homes cold and hungry because that is the policy you are creating. Power goes out in campbell and around the bay often during the summer usually when the heat is unbearable. It goes out during storms. These are not the time people should be forced out of their home searching for comfort and possibly survival.
Also, shouldn’t the city lead by example? If so, shouldn’t they stop the use of natural gas and diesel before or at last while requiring residents?
If this is true, why is city hall currently, as I type this, being run on a generator? am I able to buy and instal the exact same generator the city uses? Between the cities current law and the states law coming into effect in 2024, no I’m not.
Protecting residents in their hardest times, should be a priority. Making people suffer greatly is not worth the environmental impact at this time. There most likely will be a point soon where California will be able to implement this without harsh impacts to the residents, now is not that time.
At the end of the meeting, during committee reports, please bring this up to have a conversation placed on a near future agenda.
Thank you,
JEFF CRISTINA
Harrison Ave
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
City of Campbell, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California
CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION
Tuesday, March 7, 2023 – 6:00 PM
Doetsch Conference Room
70 N. First Street, Campbell, California
This City Council meeting was duly noticed pur suant to open meeting requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act (G.C. Section 54956).
CALL TO ORDER
The City Council of the City of Campbell convened this day in the special meeting place, at Campbell City Hall, 70 N. First Street, Campbell California in the Ralph Doetsch Conference Room.
ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status
Sergio Lopez Councilmember Present
Elliot Scozzola Councilmember Present
Dan Furtado Councilmember Present
Susan M. Landry Vice Mayor Present
Anne Bybee Mayor Present
PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public comment.
MOVE INTO CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. Personnel
B. Litigation
C. Real Property
D. Labor Negotiations – Pursuant to G.S. Section 54957.6: Conference with Labor Negotiator – Agency Negotiator: Jenny Le -Christensen, Human R esources Manager. Unrepresented Group: Management
The City Council met in Executive Session to discuss item D. City Manager, Brian Loventhal; City Attorney, William Seligmann; Assistant City Man ager, Angelique Gaeta; Finance Director, Will Fuentes and Hum an Resources Manager, Jenny Le -Christensen were in attendance.
2 Packet Pg. 8
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 7, 2023 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 7, 2023 City Council Executive Session Meeting Page 2
ADJOURN
Mayor Bybee adjourned the meeting at 6:45 p.m.
APPROVED:
Anne Bybee, Mayor
ATTEST:
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk
2 Packet Pg. 9
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 7, 2023 6:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
City of Campbell, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CAMPBELL CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, March 7, 2023 7:30 p.m.
City Hall Council Chamber – 70 N. First Street
This City Council meeting was duly noticed pursuan t to open meeting requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act (G.C. Section 54956).
This meeting was recorded and can be viewed in its entirety at www.cityofcampbell.com/agendacenter.
CALL TO ORDER
The City Council of the City of Campbell convened this day in the regular meeting place, the City Hall Council Chamber, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California.
ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status
Anne Bybee Mayor Present
Susan M. Landry Vice Mayor Present
Dan Furtado Councilmember Present
Sergio Lopez Councilmember Present
Elliot Scozzola Councilmember Present
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Cheryl Walsh of the Sean M. Walsh K -9 Memorial Foundation in recognition of her donation to the Campbell Police Department K -9 Program.
Mayor Bybee presented Ms. Walsh a Certificate of Appreciation for leading the Pledge of Allegiance.
Ms. Walsh thanked the City Council for the recognition and for acknowledging the value that K-9s bring to the community and in supporting the Police Department.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS
1. Proclamation Declaring the Month of March 2023 as "Youth Arts Month" in the City of Campbell
Recommended Action: That the City Council proclaim the month of March 2023 as Youth Arts Month in the City of Campbell.
By virtual participation, Sofia Fojas, Arts Coordinator for Artspiration, the arts education initiative, at the Santa Clara County Office of Education, thanked the 3 Packet Pg. 10
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 7, 2023 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Page 2
City Council for their support of A rts education in schools and for the proclamation recognizing Youth Arts Month in Santa Clara County. She noted the positive benefits to students from having youth arts programs available in schools.
Mayor Bybee spoke of the proclamation and stated it wou ld be given to Ms.
Fojas via mail as she was unable to attend the meeting in person.
Councilmember Scozzola stated his support for the Youth Arts Month proclamation and noted the importance of art programs within schools.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
There were no communications and petitions.
ORAL REQUESTS
Amy Taylor, Campbell resident and Cloud City Supply business owner, requested that the City Council adopt an ordinance to legalize the sale of marijuana-based products.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
March is Women’s History Month. This is a time to honor the women who have made important sacrifices and contributions to society in both the past and present. The 2023 theme is “Celebrating Women Who Tell Stories”, which recognizes women, past and present, who ha ve been active in all forms of media and storytelling inc luding print, radio, tv, stage, blogs, podcasts, news, and social media. Though the list is long, some popular historical figures who are recognized during the month of March are Maya Angelou, Maxine Hong Kingston, Jovita Idar, Toni Morrison, Gloria Stein man, and Betty Soskin.
The blood center industry is facing a real challenge today with the sustainability of the blood supply. The number of blood donors is shrinking, while the need for blood at hospitals has increased significantly over the last severa l years. To that end, Stanford Blood Center (SBC) is working on a project called “Year of Firsts” to help raise awareness for this problem and encourage local community members to donate for the first time in 2023, providing hope for healing for patients a t Bay Area hospitals and beyond. There is a Stanford Blood Center located at 295 E. Hamilton Avenue in Campbell. Please make an appointment today at standfordbloodcenter.org on the SBC app, or by calling 888-723-7831.
The Campbell Police Foundation is hosting a fundraising breakfast on Saturday, March 25 from 9:00 to 10:30 a.m. at the Home Church on Winchester Boulevard in Campbell.
Tickets are $25 per person and can be purchased at campbellpolicefoundation.org.
The Civic Improvement Commission awards grants up to $500 per neighborhood for activities and projects that address the quality of life, safety, cleanliness, and engagement throughout neighborhoods. The 2023 Neighborhood Association Assistance Grant applicatio n period is now open and will close at 5:00 p.m. on Friday, 3 Packet Pg. 11
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 7, 2023 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Page 3
March 31. To find out more about this grant opportunity, or to apply, please visit campbellca.gov.
The AARP Tax Aid Program will provide income tax assis tance free of charge through April 14 at the Campbell Community Center. The AARP Tax-Aide Program provides tax assistance to anyone, free of charge, with a focus on taxpayers who are over 50 and have a low to moderate income.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Bybee asked if anyone wished to remove an item from the Consent Calendar.
In regards to item nine, City Manager Loventhal noted that the sales tax data does not effectuate Councilmember access and staff is working on a State form that will grant them access to sales tax data, which will be brought before the Council for approval at a future meeting.
In regards to item 12, Vice Mayor Landry thanked Public Works staff for acquiring the landscape conservation rebate from Valley Water.
In regards to item 13, Mayor By bee noted the desk item and stated the revised recommended action as follows: that the City Council adopt the Resolution approving the reclassification of the vacant Office Assistant position to an Accounting Clerk II position by eliminati on of one vacant Office Assistant position and the addition of one Accounting Clerk II position.
The Consent Calendar was considered as follows:
2. Minutes of City Council Special Meeting of February 16, 2023 Recommended Action: Approve the special meeting minutes of February 16, 2023.
This action approves the special meeting minutes of February 16, 2023.
3. Minutes of City Council Special Meeting of February 21, 2023 Recommended Action: Approve the special meeting minutes of February 21, 2023.
This action approves the special meeting minutes of February 21, 2023.
4. Minutes of City Council Regular Meeting of February 21, 2023 Recommended Action: Approve the regular meeting minutes of February 21, 2023.
This action approves the regular meeting minutes of February 21, 2023.
5. Approving Bills and Claims
Recommended Action: Approve the bills and claims in the amount of $3,317,642.38.
This action approves the bills and claims in the amount of $3,317,642.38, as follows: bills and claims checks dated F ebruary 6, 2023, in the amount of $2,936,220.46; bills and claims checks dated February 13, 2023, in the amount 3 Packet Pg. 12
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 7, 2023 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Page 4
of $348,186.18; and payroll checks dated February 16, 2023, in the amount of $33,235.74.
6. Monthly Investment Transactions Report (January 2023) Recommended Ac tion: That the City Council review and accept the Monthly Investment Transactions Report for January 2023.
This action approves the Monthly Investment Transactions Report for January 2023.
7. Monthly Treasurer's Report (January 2023)
Recommended Action: That the City Council review and accept the Monthly Treasurer’s Report for the month ended January 31, 2023.
This action approves the Monthly Treasurer’s Report for the month ended January 31, 2023.
8. Approval of Parcel Map Including Acceptance of Street Dedication and Public Service Easements Shown on Said Map – 1265 Burrows Road (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Parcel Map and acc ept the street dedication and public service easements as shown on the map for the property located at 1265 Burrows Road.
Resolution 12942 approves the Parcel Map and accepts the street dedication and public service easements as shown on the map for the property located at 1265 Burrows Road.
9. Approval of Resolution Documenting the Authorized Positions and Consultants to Examine Sales, Transactions and Tax Records to Include Chabin Concepts (Resolution/Roll Call)
Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a Resolution documenting the positions and consultants authorized for examination of Sales or Transaction and Use Tax Records and adding Chabin Concepts as authorized.
Resolution 12943 documents the positions and consultants authorized for examination of Sales or Transaction and Use Tax Records and a dding Chabin Concepts as authorized.
10. Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Fourth Amendment to the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for Continued Implementation of the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runof f Pollution Prevention Program (SCVURPPP), and Appoint the Executive Director of the West Valley Clean Water Authority as the Voting and Program Representative for the SCVURPPP on Behalf of the City of Campbell (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a resolution authorizin g the City Manager to (1) execute a Fourth Amendment to the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for continued implementation of the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (SCVURPPP); an d (2) appoint the West Valley Clean Water Authority Exe cutive Director as the Voting and Program Representative for the SCVURPPP on behalf of the City of Campbell.
3 Packet Pg. 13
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 7, 2023 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Page 5
Resolution 12944 authorizes the City Manager to execute a Fourth Amendment to the Memorandu m of Agreement (MOA) for continued implementation of th e Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (SCVURPPP); and appoints the West Valley Clean Water Authority Executive Director as the Voting and Program Representative for the SCVURPP P on behalf of the City of Campbell.
11. Authorization to Submit Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Application (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the Community Development Director to submit a Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant application for a Citywide Multimodal Plan.
Resolution 12945 authorizes the Community Development Director to submit a Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant application for a Citywide Multimodal Plan.
12. Authorize the City Manager to Accept a Landscap e Conservation Rebate from Valley Water and Execute a Drought -Tolerant Lands cape Project for the Turf Conversions of Five Corridors at the Campbell Community Center (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a Resolution a uthorizing the City Manager to accept a Landscape Conversion Rebate from Val ley Water and execute a drought -resistant landscape improvement project for the turf conversion of five corridors at the Campbell Community Center, upon Valley Water’s Notice to Proceed.
Resolution 12946 authorizes the City Manager to accept a Landscape Conversion Rebate from Valley Water and execute a drought-resistant landscape improvement project for the turf conversion of five corridors at the Campbell Community Center, upon Valley Water’s Notice to Proceed.
13. Reclassification of Office Assistant to Accounting Clerk II (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt the Resolution approving the reclassification of the vacant Office Assistant positi on to an Accountant Clerk II position by elimination of one vacant Office As sistant position and the addition of one Account Clerk II position.
Including the desk item, Resolution 12947 approves the reclassification of the vacant Office Assistant position to an Accounting Clerk II position by elimination of one vacant Office Assi stant position and the addition of one Accounting Clerk II position.
M/S: Landry/Lopez - That the City Council approve the consent calendar, including the desk item for item 13. Th e motion was adopted by the following roll call vote:
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Landry
SECONDER: Lopez
3 Packet Pg. 14
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 7, 2023 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Page 6
AYES: Bybee, Landry, Furtado, Lopez, Scozzola
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES
14. 2022 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (A PR) (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Recommended Action: That the City Council take the following actions: Receive public comment, accept the Housing Element Annual Progress Report, and adopt a Resolution directin g staff to send the Annual Progress Report to the required State agencies.
Assistant Planner Lomen presented a staff report dated March 7, 2023.
Following Council questions, Mayor Bybee opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to speak.
Jim Sullivan, Campbell resident, suggested credit ing ADUs toward affordable housing projects and utilizing in -leu fees to incentivize developers to build affordable housing.
Steven Saunders, Campbell resident, requested the Council review the produced housing units semi -annually instead of annually to get a better idea of the progress made and address any concerns.
Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Bybee closed the public hearing.
Councilmembers made comments relating to affordable housing and enc ouraged staff to find alternative ways to supp ort affordable housing developments in the City.
After discussion, M/S: Landry/Lopez – That the City Council receive public comment, accept the Housing Element Annual Progress Report, and adopt Resolution 12948 directing staff to send the Annual Progress Report to the required State agencies. The motion was adopted by the following roll call vote:
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Landry
SECONDER: Lopez
AYES: Bybee, Landry, Furtado, Lopez, Scozzola
NEW BUSINESS
15. Acceptance of Donation from Sean's K9 (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a resolution to accept the donation of a police K9 from Sean's K9s for the Campbell Police Department and approve the continued use of K9 Lucas through FY 2024.
Police Captain Whi te presented a video on the Campbell Police Department K9 program.
3 Packet Pg. 15
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 7, 2023 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Page 7
Captain White presented a staff report dated March 7, 2023.
Following Council questions, Ca ptain White thanked Ms. Walsh of the Sean’s K9s for their support.
Mayor Bybee asked if anyone from the public wished to speak. There were no public speakers.
After discussion, M/S: Landry/Lopez - That the City Council adopt resolution 12949 accepting th e donation of a police K9 from Sean's K9s for the Campbell Police Department and approve the con tinued use of K9 Lucas through FY 2024. The motion was adopted by the following roll call vote:
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Landry
SECONDER: Lopez
AYES: Bybee, Landry, Furtado, Lopez, Scozzola
16. Accept Grant Funds from the State Homeland Securi ty Grant Program (SHSGP); Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Santa Clara County Regarding the Use of the Funds, Dispense with Bidding Procedures as Specified in Campbell Municipal Code (CMC) Section 3.20.030(7 ), and Award and Execute an Agreement with AT&T for the Purchase of F irstNet Compact Rapid Deployable (CRD) Emergency Communications Equipment; and Authorize a Corresponding Budget Adjustment (Resolution/Roll Cal Vote) Recommended Action: That the City Co uncil adopt a resolution authorizing the acceptance of grant funds fr om the State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP); authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the County of Santa Clara regarding the use of th ose funds, dispense with bidding procedures as specified in Campbell Municipal Code (CMC) Section 3.20.030(7), and award and execute an agreement with AT&T for the purchase of FirstNet Compact Rapid Deployable (CRD) Emergency Communications Equipment; and authorizing a corresponding budget adjustment.
Police Captain White presented a staff report dated March 7, 2023.
Following Council questions, Mayor Bybee asked if anyone from the public wished to speak. There were no public speakers.
Vice Mayor Landry stated support for the grant funding and encouraged staff to continue seeking grant opportunities.
After discussion, M/S: Scozzola/Furtado - That the City Council adopt resolution 12950 authorizing the acceptance of grant funds from the State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP); authorizing the City Manager to enter in to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the County of Santa Clara regarding the use of those funds, dispense with bidding 3 Packet Pg. 16
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 7, 2023 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
Minutes of March 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Page 8
procedures as specified in Campbell Municipal Code (CMC) Sect ion
3.20.030(7), and award and execute an agreement with AT&T for the purchase of FirstNet Compact Rapid Deployable (CRD) Emergency Communications Equipment; and authorizing a corresponding budget adjustment. The motion was adopted by the following roll call vote:
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Scozzola
SECONDER: Furtado
AYES: Bybee, Landry, Furtado, Lopez, Scozzola
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There were no unfinished business items.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
17. Council Committee Reports
Recommended Action: That the City Council report on activities from their committee assignments.
Vice Mayor Landry attended the Campbell Community Center Open House; and the grand opening of Humphry Slocombe Pruneyard.
Councilmember Furtado attended the Downtown Campbell Bu siness Association meeting and spoke of their upcoming events such as the Annual CERT Fundraiser, the Wine Walk, and a Car Show.
Councilmember Lopez attended the Bay Area Air Quality Management Distri ct, strategic planning meeting; the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors meeting; and a workshop on the Bart Phase II extension.
Mayor Bybee attended the grand opening of Humphry Slocombe Pruneyard, the ribbon cutting ceremony fo r Flora a health and wellness store; the Friends of the Heritage Theatre meeting; the Legislative Subcommittee meeting with Councilmember Lopez; the Campbell Community Center Open House; and threw out the first pitch at the Campbell Girls Fastpitch Opening Day Ceremony.
ADJOURN
Mayor Bybee adjourned the meeting at 8:34 p.m.
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
Anne Bybee, Mayor
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk
3 Packet Pg. 17
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 7, 2023 7:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)
City
Council
Report
TITLE: Approving Bills and Claims
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve the bills and claims in the amount of $1,556,489.07.
DISCUSSION
The bills and claims that have been audited and approved by staff for payments made are noted below:
Type Check Date Amount
Bills & Claims February 20, 2023 $452,689.39
Bills & Claims February 27, 2023 $1,103,799.68
Total $1,556,489.07
FISCAL IMPACT
Requested action does not require a budget adjustment. Adequate funding was available to cover all expenses as listed.
Prepared by:
Celia Deniz, Accounting Clerk II
Reviewed by:
Norite Vong, Finance Manager
Item: 4
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: March 21, 2023
4 Packet Pg. 18
Approving Bills and Claims Page 2 of 2
Approved by:
Angelique Gaeta, Assistant City
Manager
4 Packet Pg. 19
City
Council
Report
TITLE: Agreement with the Santa Clara County for the Senior Nutrition Program Home and Community Based Services Infrastructure Funding for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the FY 2022 -23 Senior Nutrition Program Congregate Meals - HCBS Infrastructure Funding Agreement with the County in the amount of $ 44,322 and approve a budget adjustment to the Senior Nutrition Program budget (101.525) to recognize and appropriate grant funds.
BACKGROUND
In April 2022, Sourcewise, Area Agency on Aging invited the Santa Clara County Senior Nutrition Program to apply for the Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) Senior Nutrition Infrastructure Grant Program (NI) funding beginning on July 1, 2022, through December 31, 2023. The HCBS NI funding provides $38 million to enhance, expand, and increase senior nutrition inf rastructure in California under the Mello - Granlund Older Californians Act. The grant provides opportunities for Senior Nutrition Program sites to improve infrastructure and increase capacity to serve older adults. The City of Campbell already has an agreement in place with the Santa Clara County Senior Nutrition Program to administer nutritious meals to senior citizens in Campbell. The Santa Clara County Program Administrators encouraged all Nutrition sites to submit funding requests to the County so that t he County could apply for grant funding. The County then submitted one grant application to Sourcewise on behalf of all sites currently in partnership with Santa Clara County.
DISCUSSION
At the request of the County, the City of Campbell submitted f unding requests that would enhance the infrastructure of the onsite Senior Nutrition Program. Funding requests were provided for new round tables and chairs, updated painting throughout the interior, and new flooring to the congregate dining area. These e nhancements will create an inviting and attractive ambiance that promotes socialization and a sense of community. The goal is to move away from institutional style dining to a more Item: 5
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: March 21, 2023
5 Packet Pg. 20
Senior Nutrition Program- HCBS Infrastructure Funding FY 2022-2023 Page 2 of 3 contemporary setting. Creating a warm and welcoming atmosphere will boost p rogram attendance and support continued growth.
The Santa Clara County Senior Nutrition Program was awarded grant funding from HCBS NI and the City of Campbell was notified in November 2022 that the funding requests submitted were approved. The County requested updated bids for the funding requests and staff worked quickly to provide revised quotes as the cost of materials and labor had increased from the original estimates submitted in May 2022. The County approved the revised bids and included modest funds for additional inflation.
The HCBS Infrastructure Funding Agreement provides funding in FY 2022 -23 for the provision of infrastructure improvements. The grant funding of $44,322 would be programmed in the Senior Nutrition Program budget (101.525) in the General Fund.
Attached is the FY 2022-23 HCBS Budget which outlines the funding from the County of Santa Clara for the itemized improvements (Attachment B).
FISCAL IMPACT
The FY 2022 -23 HCBS Infrastructure Grant is a benefit to the City’s Senio r Nutrition Program as there is no match requirement to accept these funds. The funding of $44,322 would be programmed in to the FY 2023 Senior Nutrition Program budget (101.525) in the General Fund through the resolution and budget adjustment form attached. The funds are earmarked for the infrastructure improvements approved in the HCBS Grant and must be expended by June 30, 2023. The City will purchase the approved items in the HCBS Grant and submit reimbursement to the County not to exceed $44,322.
ALTERNATIVE
Do not authorize the City Manager to execute the FY 2022 -23 Senior Nutrition Program Congregate Meals - HCBS Infrastructure Funding Agreement with the County and provide alternative direction to staff.
Prepared by:
Tina Wong-Erling, Senior Services
Supervisor
Reviewed by:
5 Packet Pg. 21
Natasha Bissell, Recreation and
Community Services Director
Senior Nutrition Program- HCBS Infrastructure Funding FY 2022-2023 Page 3 of 3 Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Resolution County Agreement FY 2022-2023 HCBS Grant
b. SNP HCBS GRANT BUDGET FY 2022-23
c. Budget Adjustment Form
5 Packet Pg. 22
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE SENIOR
NUTRITION PROGRAM HOME AND COMMUNITY BASED SERVICES
INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA IN FY 22-23 AND APPROVE A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT TO
RECOGNIZE AND APPROPRRIATE RELATED GRANT FUNDS
WHEREAS, in April 2022, Sourcewise invited the Santa Clara County Senior Nutrition Program to apply for the Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) Senior Nutrition Infrastructure Grant Program (NI); and
WHEREAS, the Home and Community Based Se rvices (HCBS) Infrastructure Grant provides funding for enhancements to the Senior Nutrition Program dining areas; and
WHEREAS, the Santa Clara County Senior Nutrition Progr am Administrator encouraged Nutrition sites to submit funding requests and whereby the County would submit one grant application; and
WHEREAS, the County of Santa Clara was awarded grant funding by the HCBS NI; and
WHEREAS, the grant funding will be administered through the County of Santa Clara Senior Nutrition Program through an a greement with the City of Campbell; and
WHEREAS, the City will make a budget adjustment to recognize and appropriate related grant funds to pay for the enhanceme nts and se ek reimbursement from the County of Santa Clara per the agreement; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Campbell does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute the HCBS Infrastructure Funding Agreement with Santa Clara County to increase funding in the Senior Nutrition Program for FY 22-23.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of March 2023 by the f ollowing roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
5.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Resolution County Agreement FY 2022-2023 HCBS Grant (Senior Nutrition Program- HCBS Infrastructure Funding FY 2022-2023) ABSENT: Councilmembers:
APPROVED:
________________________
Anne Bybee, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk
5.a
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Resolution County Agreement FY 2022-2023 HCBS Grant (Senior Nutrition Program- HCBS Infrastructure Funding FY 2022-2023)
5.b
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: SNP HCBS GRANT BUDGET FY 2022-23 (Senior Nutrition Program- HCBS Infrastructure Funding FY 2022-2023) City of Campbell
Request for Budget Adjustments
Department/Program Division Date Request No.
March 21, 2023 BA-18
Budget to be Reduced
Fund/Program Account Number Description Amount
Budget to be Increased
Fund/Program Account Number Description Amount
REVENUES
101.525 4523 Other Grants 44,322.00
EXPENDITURES
101.525 7427 Special Departmental 14,831.00
101.525 7428 29,491.00
REASON FOR REQUEST - BE SPECIFIC:
Recreation & Community Services Director City Manager
Recreation Department
Will Fuentes Natasha Bissell Brian Loventhal
To accept and appropriate funds from the Home and Community Based Services grant (HCBS) Senior Nutrition Infrastructure Grant Program. Funds will be utilized to purchase new round tables and chairs, update paint throughout the interior of the onsite Senior Nutrition Program, and update flooring to the congregate dining area. 525 - Senior Nutrition
Maintenance-Building
Finance Director
5.c
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Budget Adjustment Form (Senior Nutrition Program- HCBS Infrastructure Funding FY 2022-2023)
City
Council
Report
TITLE: Approval of a Used Car Dealer Permit for Silicon Valley Enthusiast LLC (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopts a Resolut ion approving the issuance of a Used Car Dealer Permit to sell used cars at 3293 S. Winchester Boulevard.
DISCUSSION
The City has received an application for a used car dealer permit from Raman Lazary, Silicon Valley Enthusiast LLC, at 3293 S. Winchester Boulevard.
There’s no Conditional Use Permit for this property allowing for used car sales. In 2013 Planning approved the previous business, Prestige Pre -owned, for vehicle sales at this location. Per Planning, the property is “grandfathered in” and is a legal non-conforming use for vehicle sales without a Conditional Use Permit.
The applicant who seeks the permit is the owner of Silicon Valley Enthusiast LLC California Articles of Organization of a Limited Liability Company Entity Number 201615410548 was filed May 26, 2016. Mr. Raman Lazary and Mr. Mathew Pirayo are managing members of the business. Silicon Valley Enthusiasts has had locations in both San Jose and Hayward. Mr. Lazary has run the day to day operations of business since 2016 and therefore has a history of business operations.
The applicant’s business will be located at 3293 S. Winchester Boulevard, Campbell, CA and will include the sales of use d vehicles as well as an office. The business will not include, a service area, paint, body work, welding or fabrication. The applicant states he will have five (5) employees and seeks the abi lity to sell the vehicles from 10:00 am to 6:00 pm, Monday through Saturday.
A background check on the applicant consisting of fingerprinting was conducted and the Department of Justice responded with no information prohibiting the applicant from operating a used car dealership.
FISCAL IMPACT
Item: 6
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: March 21, 2023
6 Packet Pg. 27
Used Car Dealer Permit- Silicon Valley Enthusiast LLC Page 2 of 2 The applicant has paid the Campbell Police Department fee of $261 for the used car dealer permit. This is a non -refundable fee no matter what decision is rendered by the City Council. The applicant is also required to pay the necessary business license fees to the City. Due to the nature of the business, the dealership will also generate Sales Tax revenue for the City, but an estimate cannot be made at this time until actual sales results are realized.
Prepared by:
Ana Spear, Police Permits
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Silicon valley Enthusiast Resolution
b. PD-2023-70-S 76-18 - Planning File
6 Packet Pg. 28
RESOLUTION NO. ____
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A USED MOTOR VEHICLE DEALER PERMIT TO SILICON VALLEY ENTHUSIAST LLC. LOCATED AT 3293 S.
WINCHESTER BLVD.
WHEREAS, after due consideration of al l the evidence presented , the City Council does find as follows:
1. Business: The proposed business will involve the retail sale of used vehicles to the public.
2. Location: The business is operated at one property , located at 3293 S. W inchester Blvd., Campbell, CA 95008.
3. Zoning: The locations of the business are within the C-2 (General Commercial) Zoning District. The applicant has secured the necessary land use entitlements for the retail sale of motor vehicles.
4. Ownership: The applicant is the owner of Silicon Valley Enthusiast LLC
5. Experience: The applicant has operated the business for over 6 years.
6. Background Review: A background check through the Department of Justice revealed that there is no information prohibiting the applicant from operating a use d car dealership.
WHEREAS, based on the foregoing findings, the City Council further finds and concludes that, subject to the Conditions of Approval, there is no evidence that the activity applied for or the location thereof will create a public nuisance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Campbell does hereby grant a Used Motor Vehicle Dealer Permit to Silicon Valley Enthusiast LLC, pursuant to Campbell Municipal Code Section 5.08.010(12), subject to the following Conditi ons of Approval:
1. Approved Permit: Approval is granted for a Used Motor V ehicle Dealer Permit to allow the retail sale of used motor vehicles on property located at 3293 S. Winchester Blvd.
2. Approval Expiration : Approval of the Used Motor Vehicle Dealer P ermit is valid in perpetuity, subject to continued compliance with the C onditions of Approval contained herein. A change in business ownership shall require approval of a new Used Motor Vehicle Dealer Permit.
6.a
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Silicon valley Enthusiast Resolution (Used Car Dealer Permit- Silicon Valley Enthusiast LLC)
3. Compliance with Conditions : The business at al l times shall remain in compliance with the Conditions of Approval imposed by S76-18 except where the Conditions of Approval contained herein provide a more restrictive or specific requirement or limitation.
4. Street Parking: Vehicles for sale or in invent ory shall not be parked, displayed, stored, or otherwise placed on the public street.
5. Employees: There will be five (5) employee of Silicon Valley Enthusiast LLC.
6. Hours of Operation : The hours of operation for the vehicle sales office and associated sales activities shall be restricted as follows.
• The business's operating hours, when employees may be on site, shall be limited to 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM Monday through Saturday
7. Business License : The business owner shall at all times maintain a City of Campb ell Business License.
8. DMV Dealer License: The business owner shall at all times maintain in good standing a Vehicle Dealer License from the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).
9. Fingerprint Clearance : The business owner has successfully pass ed a background check through Department of Justice fingerprinting system.
10. Sales Office: All sales activity, other than the viewing of vehicles, shall take place within the auto sales office.
11. On-Site Advertising: There shall be no form of temporary on -site advertising associated with the retail auto sales business, including but not limited to, flags, strobe lights, banners, A-frames, and human signs advertising. All permanent signage shall comply with the provisions of the Campbell Municipal Code.
12. Vehicle A dvertising: Vehicles for sale shall only contain the minimum information necessary as required by the Department of Motor Vehicles. Vehicles shall not be advertised with painted letters or numbers, streamers, flags, or similar attention grabbing contrivances.
13. Property Maintenance : The owner/operator of the subject property shall maintain all exterior areas of the business free from graffiti, trash, rubbish, posters and stickers placed on the property.
14. Noise Standard : Any noises, sounds and/or voices, in cluding but not limited to amplified sounds, loud speakers, sounds from audio sound systems, and/or music, generated by the subject shall not be audible to a person of normal hearing capacity from any residential property. Public address systems of all types are strictly prohibited.
6.a
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Silicon valley Enthusiast Resolution (Used Car Dealer Permit- Silicon Valley Enthusiast LLC)
15. Parking and Driveways: All parking and driveway areas shall be striped and maintained in compliance with the approval plans and Chapter 21.28 (Parking and Loading) of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking and driveway area s shall be regularly swept and cleaned to remove litter and debris.
16. Revocation of Permit : Operation of the business in violation of the Used Motor Vehicle Dealer Permit or any standards, codes, or ordinances of the City of Campbell, shall constitute a public nuisance pursuant to Campbell Municipal Code Section 6.10.020(6), which shall be grounds for revocation of the Used Motor Vehicle Dealer Permit by the City Council.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of March, 2023, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
APPROVED:
Anne Bybee, Mayor
ATTEST:
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk
6.a
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Silicon valley Enthusiast Resolution (Used Car Dealer Permit- Silicon Valley Enthusiast LLC) ITEM i I
STAFF COMMENT SHEET - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF OEC[MBER 20, 1977 s 76-1 8
Ki rkor i an
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
App Ii cation of Kent Ki rkor i an for approva 1 of a
revised parking and circulation patter'l for an
existing auto service center locat ed on property
known as 3293 and 3303 South Winchester Boulevard
in a C-H Zoning Oistr::t. (See map and applicant's
state ment attached.)
Approval, subject to the attached conditions.
STAFF DISCUSSION
The applicant is proposing to separ-ate the ex i sting auto center and Alex's Porshe House to the north. The revised site plan reflects how each development wil 1 stand on its own . The Porshe House to the north wi 11 be combined with a vacant parcel to its north for additional parking.
The Campbel 1 Municipal Code requ i r es one space for each 350 square feet of gross floor area for automotive repair uses. The original Kirkorian center will have 44 parking space s for the 15,000 square feet and wi ll result In a ratio of one space for each 341 square feet of g ross floor area. It is the staff 1 s opini r n that t his will be adequate. The Porshe House not only r e pairs vehicles but has a I icense to sell vehicles. Periodic checks by staff reveal a higher intensity of parking than the usual auto re pai r center. The Po rshe House contains 6,200 square feet of gross floor area. Appproximately 5,000 square feet is us ed for a ut o repair and the remainder of 1,200 square feet is related to auto sales. The auto repair area would require 14 spaces (5,000 t 350 = 14 , 3 spaces). The app licant is proposing a total of 26 parking spaces, and a future addition of approximately 2,725 squa r e feet . It is the staff 1 s opinion that there wi ll not be a parking problem or circulation problem if parking is li mited to the desi4nated spaces only. The applicant should be aware that before any approval would be given to the "future addition" that a parking study would be conducted to insure adequate parking for the addition .
Lands caping is indicated along the northerly and souther l y property lines with a five foot planter strip, and along the front prope rt y line wi th a five foot planter strip on private p rope rt y and two feet on Cit y property. Staff has 11 redlined 11 additional areas that we feel wi ll enhance the center and help break up the asphaltic areas.
It should be not ed that the City Counci I has expressed concern to the staff about the lack o f landscaping on the site. It i s intended by this approval to insure that lcmdscapin g wi 11 be installed as wel l as protection against on site traffic.
_J
6.b
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: PD-2023-70-S 76-18 - Planning File (Used Car Dealer Permit- Silicon Valley Enthusiast LLC)
6.b
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: PD-2023-70-S 76-18 - Planning File (Used Car Dealer Permit- Silicon Valley
6.b
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: PD-2023-70-S 76-18 - Planning File (Used Car Dealer Permit- Silicon Valley
6.b
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: PD-2023-70-S 76-18 - Planning File (Used Car Dealer Permit- Silicon Valley Enthusiast
6.b
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: PD-2023-70-S 76-18 - Planning File (Used Car Dealer Permit- Silicon Valley Enthusiast LLC)
6.b
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: PD-2023-70-S 76-18 - Planning File (Used Car Dealer Permit- Silicon Valley Enthusiast LLC)
City
Council
Report
TITLE: Authorization to Submit a Climate Adaptation Planning Grant Application (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a Resolut ion authorizing the Community Development Director to apply for a Climate Adaptation Planning Grant for a Climate Action Plan.
BACKGROUND
The City Council has identified as a Council Priority the preparation of a Climate Action Plan for the City. As id entified in Table 1 in the FY 2023 Budget, the first action under the Council Priority of Sustainability states
“Prepare climate action planning upon completion of General Plan and Housing Element
Council feedback provided at the February 16, 2023, priority setting study session re - emphasized the need for Campbell to prepare a Climate Action Plan.
In addition, the Draft E nvironmental Impact Report (“DEIR”) prepared for the Envision Campbell General Plan Update (“General Plan”) identified that buildout under the General Plan, including planned residential development under the Draft Housing Element (“Campbell’s Plan for Hou sing”), would have significant environmental impacts related to Greenhouse Gas Emissions (“GHG”). The Draft General Plan identified policies and programs the City can implement to reduce these significant environmental impacts. This includes the preparation of a climate action plan as identified under Policy COS-10.c.
Policy COS-10.c states
Prepare a Climate Action Plan that establishes GHG reduction targets that are consistent with Statewide GHG reduction goals and includes an implementation program to achieve the reduction targets. Periodically review and update the Plan as necessary to achieve the GHG reduction targets specified in the Plan.
Item: 7
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: March 21, 2023
7 Packet Pg. 38
Climate Adaptation Planning Grant Page 2 of 4
In December 2022, the State Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”) announced the availability of the Clima te Adaptation Planning Grant program (“Grant program”) with a grant submittal deadline of March 31, 2023.
According to the Grant program guidelines and website, the purpose of the Grant program is to
“provide funding to help fill planning needs, provi de communities the resources to identify climate resilience priorities, and support the development of climate resilient projects across the state”
The grant program has $25 million total available within three funding rounds for successful grant projects to be awarded through a competitive solicitation process. The minimum award amount is set at $150,000 and the maximum is $650,000. The deadline to submit the grant is March 31, 2023, and notification of awards is anticipated to occur in May or June 2023.
DISCUSSION
Subject to Council authorization, the City is applying for a Climate Adaptation Planning Grant to partially fund the preparation of a Climate Action Plan for Campbell. City staff anticipates that the work effort to prepare the Climate Act ion Plan will cost approximately $300,000 and occur over a two-to-three-year period. The Grant Program does not require a local match. However, as the City will be preparing a Climate Action Plan that holistically focuses both on Climate Action (Greenhou se Gas reduction) and Climate Adaptation (addressing the impacts of climate change on the City) . As the Grant Program is only focused on Climate Adaptation, staff is proposing to apply for a grant amount that funds the Climate Adaptation portion of the workplan. As such, the City is applying for a grant that will include $150,000 in Adaptation Planning grant funding.
Preparation of a Climate Action Plan will include the following key milestones and deliverables –
• Identification and implementation of community stakeholder and a key partner collaboration process accessing important technical expertise and resource support for the process.
• An assessment of the city’s existing Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) and projected future Greenhouse Gas Emissions under business as usual, leveraging existing data resources, including those provided by Silicon Valley Clean Energy.
• An assessment of the potential climate impacts to the Campbell community, including drought, heat impacts, and riverine flooding, utilizi ng data and analysis prepared by the County Office of Sustainability (Silicon Valley 2.0).
7 Packet Pg. 39
Climate Adaptation Planning Grant Page 3 of 4
• Comprehensive community and stakeholder outreach with residents, workers, and business owners in the city, including engagement with underserved communities and neighborhoods and those most vulnerable to climate impacts. • Identification of strategies and actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, including actions in sectors such as transportation, building energy usage and waste / wastewater management.
• Identification of strategies and actions to prepare the Campbell community to adapt to or to mitigate the impacts of climate change, including heat, drought, and riverine flooding.
• Identification of a prioritized implementation strategy,
FISCAL IMPACTS
Staff is recommending that the City Council authorize the a Grant application in the amount of $150,000. If the City is awarded the grant, the grant revenue, grant-related expenditures, and any additional costs to complete the plan, will either be programmed into the FY 2024 Proposed Budget or added later as a budget adjustment; dependent on timing of grant award.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not submit the Climate Adaptation Planning grant applications for preparation of a climate action plan. Pursuant to Council direction, staff will identify other potential funding sources to support this priority workplan.
Rob Eastwood, Community
Development Director
7 Packet Pg. 40
Prepared by:
Climate Adaptation Planning Grant Page 4 of 4
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Climate Adaptation Planning Grant Resolution
7 Packet Pg. 41
RESOLUTION NO. ___________
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL
AUTHORIZING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO SUBMIT A
CLIMATE ADAPTATION PLANING APPLICATION
WHEREAS, in December 2022, the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) announced a Call for Projects for the Climate Adaptation Planning Grants, and informed eligible agencies of a March 31, 2023, deadline for submittal of applications, as well as the grant requirements;
WHEREAS, the Climate Adaptation Planning grant funding may be used for preparing climate action plans that address climate adaptation; WHEREAS, the City Council has identified as a Council Priority the preparation of a climate action plan for the City as identified in the FY 2023 Budget and during the February 16, 2023 Council priority setting session.
WHEREAS, the D raft Environmental Impact Report ( “DEIR”) for the 2040 Envision General Plan (“General Plan”) identified that development buildout under the General Plan would result in significant environmental impacts associated with Greenhouse Gas Emissions (“GHG”).
WHEREAS, the General Plan identifies policies and programs to reduce the significant GHG environmental impacts, including Policy COS-10.c which states “Prepare a Climate Action Plan that establishes GHG reduction targets that are consistent with Statewide GHG reduction goals, and includes an implementation program to achieve the reduction targets. Periodically review and update the Plan as necessary to achieve the GHG reduction targets specified in the Plan.
WHEREAS, the Climate Adaptation Planning Grant would partially fund preparation of a climate action plan, addressing both GHG reduction and climate adaptation / resilience strategies;
WHEREAS, the preparation of a climate action plan meets the Climate Adaptation Planning Grant application requirements;
WHEREAS, staff estimates the cost of this effort to be up to $300,000 and is applying for grant funding of $ 150,000, where the maximum grant award for the preparation of an eligible project under the Climate Adaptation Planning grant funding application is $650,000; and
7.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Climate Adaptation Planning Grant Resolution (Climate Adaptation Planning Grant) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , that the City Council of the City of Campbell authorizes the Community Development Director submit a Climate Adaptation Planning grant application to OPR for the climate action plan.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ________, ______, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
APPROVED:
______________________________
Anne Bybee, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk
7.a
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Climate Adaptation Planning Grant Resolution (Climate Adaptation Planning Grant)
City
Council
Report
TITLE: Authorization to Award Contract and Execute Agreement for Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project (CIP No. 22 -OO) (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to award the contract to and execute the consultant services agreement with Alta Planning + Design, Inc. for the Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project.
BACKGROUND
On Jun e 24, 2016, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Board of Directors adopted a resolution to place a ballot measure before the voters of Santa Clara County in November 2016 to authorize a one-half of one percent retail transaction and use t ax (2016 Measure B) for 30 years for nine transportation -related program categories.
On November 8, 2016, the voters of Santa Clara County enacted 2016 Measure B for 30 years to pay for nine transportation-related program categories.
On October 5, 20 17, the VTA Board of Directors established the 2016 Measure B Program that included a Bicycle & Pedestrian program category to fund bicycle and pedestrian projects and educational programs. One of the three sub -categories of this program is the education & encouragement program (Bike/Ped E&E Program).
The Bike/Ped E&E Program covers activities and the development and distribution of materials that are designed and intended to satisfy the following goals: 1) promote, educate, and/or encourage safe walki ng or bicycling for residents or visitors of every age and ability; 2) communicate to residents and visitors the benefits of walking and bicycling; 3) communicate to school children, residents, and visitors the rights and responsibilities of pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists.
On April 28, 2020, VTA and Campbell executed a funding agreement for use of 2016 Measure B funds for Bike/Ped E&E Program expenditures. One of the City’s obligations is to complete and submit to VTA by October 1 of each year the City’s proposed work program for the Bike/Ped E&E Program.
Item: 8
Category: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: March 21, 2023
8 Packet Pg. 44
Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project Page 2 of 5 On May 20, 2021, staff began to engage the Campbell Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) regarding proposed project concepts for the use of the Bike/Ped E&E Program funds. Among the proposed concepts was the creation of Safe Routes to School Maps.
DISCUSSION
Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project Scope
The Campbell Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Maps Project would create school route maps for elementary and middle schools in Ca mpbell Union School District (CUSD).
There are seven CUSD schools whose sites are in Campbell city limits or whose students are from Campbell and neighboring cities. Based on available staff resources, the first phase of this project would be limited to three schools. Additional schools can be addressed in future phases of this project.
On September 16, 2022, a Castlemont Elementary School student was tragically killed after being hit by a car near the school in San Jose. News of the fatal crash reverberated throughout the community. Castlemont Elementary School was deemed to be a high priority school to address.
In late 2022, staff received complaints regarding pedestrian safety for school children and parents who walk to Forest Hill Elementary S chool from as far south as Westmont Avenue near Silacci Drive. Forest Hill Elementary School was therefore included in the project scope.
Rolling Hills Middle School has a very high number of pedestrians and bicyclists who travel along and across Pollard Road. In the past two years , Town of Los Gatos staff have kept Campbell staff abreast of the Town’s efforts to address school parents’ concerns. Given the number of school pedestrians and bicyclists at this school, Rolling Hills Middle School was also included in the project scope.
To summarize, the schools included in this first phase of the Campbell Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Maps Project are:
• Castlemont Elementary School in San Jose
• Forest Hill Elementary School in Campbell
• Rolling Hills Middle School in Campbell.
The project would be managed by Campbell Public Works staff in partnership with CUSD, City of San Jose Department of Transportation (SJ DOT), Town of Los Gatos Public Works Department, and County Public Health Department (PHD).
The remaining schools will be addressed in the next phase of the project.
Required Consultant Services
8 Packet Pg. 45
Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project Page 3 of 5 Consultant services are needed to engage the various stakeholders, perform school walking and bicycling/rolling audits, survey travel choices, engage school officials and parents, and prepare maps and web tools.
At the time the Request for Proposals (RFP) was prepared, the cost estimate was below the $50,000. Based on the City’s Purchasing Policy, consultant services up to $50,000 require three informal q uotations/bids. On January 3, 2023, the Public Works Department issued an RFP and solicited proposals from three bidders. On January 27, 2023, the proposals were due. The City received only one proposal. The proposal was from Alta Planning + Design, In c. Alta’s cost proposal was $70,510 —an amount that exceeds the $50,000 threshold for informal bids.
Under Section 3.20.091 (Requests for Proposals [RFP]) of the Campbell Municipal Code, the City may retain consultant services at a fee more than $50,000 only by approval of the City Council.
Staff is requesting that the City Council accept the results of the initial advertisement of the project to avoid delays of readvertising the project. Staff is also requesting authorization to award the contract a nd enter into a consultant services agreement with Alta Planning + Design Inc., the lone responsive bidder for this project. Alta is a leader in bicycle and pedestrian consulting. Staff recommends awarding the contract to Alta Planning + Design Inc.
Tentative Schedule
The tentative schedule is as follows:
Execute Consultant Contract March 2023
Kickoff Meetings April 2023
Site Review, School Walking & Rolling Audits April-May 2023 Community and Stakeholder Engagement
Discuss Post-Walk Audit School Routes April-May 2023
Project website and interactive web map April-June 2023 Draft map review pop-up event August-September 2023
Develop SRTS Maps April-August 2023
Distribute Maps to Schools August-September 2023
Summarize Project Findings October-December 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT
The City has accumulated approximately $119,000 in 2016 Measure B Bike/Ped E&E Program funds in Project 22 -OO. This amount is sufficient to cover the cost of consultant services and staff costs. In addition, staff has executed cost -share agreements with the City of San Jose and Town of Los Gatos for amounts not to exceed $25,000 for San Jose and $11,000 for Los Gatos. The cost -shares can be 8 Packet Pg. 46
Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project Page 4 of 5 rolled back into Project 22-OO to abate project expenditures. No local match is required for the use of 2016 Measure B Bike/Ped E&E Program funds.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Do not authorize award of the consultant services contract; re -advertise the project for formal bids. This alternative is not recommended given the concerns that the community have in addressing school traffic safety following the Castlemont Elementary School fatal crash. Delaying the project would misalign the project schedule with school schedules.
2. Authorize award of the consultant services cont ract but renegotiate cost -share agreement amounts. This alternative is also not recommended given the concerns that the community have in addressing school traffic safety following the Castlemont Elementary School fatal crash. The process of negotiating the cost -share agreements was long and arduous. The City has sufficient 2016 Measure B Bike/Ped E&E Program funds to complete this project even without cost -sharing from Los Gatos and San Jose.
Prepared by:
Matthew Jue, Traffic Engineer
Reviewed by:
Todd Capurso, Director of Public Works
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Resolution
b. Alta SRTS Scope of Work
8 Packet Pg. 47
Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project Page 5 of 5 c. Alta SRTS Work Schedule
8 Packet Pg. 48
RESOLUTION NO. ___________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO AWARD THE CONTRACT AND EXECUTE
THE AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR THE CAMPBELL SAFET
ROUTES TO SCHOOL MAPS PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Bicycle & Pedestrian Education and Encouragement (Bike/Ped E&E) Program covers activities and the development and distribution of materials that are designed and intended to satisfy the following goals: 1) promote, educate, and/or encourage safe walking or bicycling for residents or visitors of every age and ability; 2) communicate to residents and visitors the benefits of walking and bicycling; 3) communicate to school children, residents, and visitors the rights and responsibilities of pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. t; and
WHEREAS, the Campbell Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Maps Project would create school route maps for elementary and middle schools in Campbell Union School District (CUSD); and
WHEREAS, the first phase of this project would include Castlemont Elementary School, Forest Hill Elementary School, and Rolling Hills Elementary School; and
WHEREAS, consultant services are needed to engage the various stakeholders, perform school walking and bicycling/rolling audits, survey travel choices, engage school officials and parents, and prepare maps and web tools; and
WHEREAS, at the time the project’s Request for Proposals (RFP) was prepared, the cost estimate was below the $50,000; and
WHEREAS, based on the City’s Purchasing Policy, consultant services up to $50,000 require three informal quotations/bids; and
WHEREAS, on January 3, 2023, the Public Works Department issued an RFP and solicited proposals from three bidders; and
WHEREAS, on January 27, 2023, the City received only one proposal; and
WHEREAS, the lone proposal was from Alta Planning + Design, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, Alta’s cost proposal was $70,510 —an amount that exceeds the $50,000 threshold for informal bids; and
WHEREAS, under Section 3.20.091 (Requests for Proposals [RFP]) of the Campbell Municipal Code, the City may retain consultant services at a fee more than $50,000 only by approval of the City Council; and
8.a
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Resolution (Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project)
WHEREAS, staff is requesting that the City Council accept the results of the initial advertisement of the project to avoid delays of readvertising the project; and
WHEREAS, staff is also requesting authorization to award the contract and enter into a consultant services agreement with Alta Planning + Design Inc.; and
WHEREAS, the City has accumulated approximately $119,000 in 2016 Measure B Bike/Ped E&E Program funds in Project 22-OO; and
WHEREAS, this amount is sufficient to cover the cost of consultant services and staff costs; and
WHEREAS, staff has executed cost -share agreements with the City of San Jose and Town of Los Gatos for amounts not to e xceed $25,000 for San Jose and $11,000 for Los Gatos; and
WHEREAS, the cost-shares will abate project expenditures; and
WHEREAS, no local match is required for the use of 2016 Measure B Bike/Ped E&E Program funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , by t he City Council of the City of Campbell that the City Manager is hereby authorized to award the contract to and execute the consultant services agreement with Alta Planning + Design, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $70,510.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of March, 2023, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
APPROVED:
___________________________________
Anne Bybee, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk
8.a
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Resolution (Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project)
8.b
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Alta SRTS Scope of Work (Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project)
8.b
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Alta SRTS Scope of Work (Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project)
8.b
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Alta SRTS Scope of Work (Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project)
8.b
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Alta SRTS Scope of Work (Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project)
8.b
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Alta SRTS Scope of Work (Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project)
8.b
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Alta SRTS Scope of Work (Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project)
8.b
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Alta SRTS Scope of Work (Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project)
8.b
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Alta SRTS Scope of Work (Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project)
8.c
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Alta SRTS Work Schedule (Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project)
8.c
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Alta SRTS Work Schedule (Campbell Safe Routes to School Maps Project)
City
Council
Report
TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the Planning Commission’s Approval of a Variance for Property Located at 68 Page Street to Allow Construction of an Approximately 1,053 Square -Foot One - Story Single-Family Dwelling, Inclusive of a 313 Square -Foot Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU), with a 529 Square -Foot Attached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU), with Substandard Front - and Street- Side Setbacks (14 ½-Ft and 3-Ft Respectively), Including Retention of an Existing Detached Non -Conforming Garage. File No.: PLN -2022- 101. (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a resolution denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's approval of a Variance.
ENVIRONMENTAL (CEQA) DETERMINATION
The Planning Commission found that this project is Categorically Exempt under Section 15303, Class 3 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), perta ining to the construction of single-family dwellings.
PROJECT DATA
Zoning Designation: R-1-6 (Single-Family Residential)
General Plan Designation: Low-Density Residential (less than 6 units/gr. acre) Net Lot Area: 3,415 square-feet 6,000 square-feet (Min. Required)1 Density: 6.01 units/gr. acre1 6 units/gr. acre. (Max. Allowed) Building Height: 15 ¼ feet 35 feet (Max. Allowed)
Building Square Footage:
Primary Living Area: 740 square feet
Accessory Dwelling Unit: 529 square feet
Jr. Accessory Dwelling Unit: 313 square feet
1,582 square feet (Total House Size)
1 That the property does not satisfy the minimum lot size, and therefore, results in an exceedance to the maximum density is not considered a "non-conforming" condition that would preclude creation of a primary dwelling, ADU, and/or JADU.
Item: 9
Category: PUBLIC HEARINGS AND
INTRODUCTION OF
ORDINANCES
Meeting Date: March 21, 2023
9 Packet Pg. 61
PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval Page 2 of 9
Existing Detached Garage: 329 square feet
Floor Area Ratio (FAR)2: .40 .45 (Max. Allowed) Building (Lot) Coverage2: 40% 40% (Max. Allowed)
Parking: 2 spaces (covered) 0 spaces required (AB 2097) Setbacks: Proposed Required (Absent Variance)
Front (west): 14 ½ feet 20 feet
Street-Side (north): 3 feet 12 feet
Side (south): 5 feet 5 feet
Rear (east): 28 feet (to house) 5 feet
Garage (north): 4 feet (existing) 25 feet
BACKGROUND
Proposed Project: As depicted on the submitted Project Plans (reference Attachment B), the proposed Variance application would allow construction of a single -family dwelling, inclusive of a junior accessory dwelling un it (JADU), with an attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU), with a substandard front setback of approximately 14 ½ feet and street -side setback of 3 -feet. The project includes retention of an existing detached non-conforming garage at the rear, as shown, below:
Project Site : The project site is a single -family residential property located at the southeast corner of Page Street and Maple Avenue, a block from East Campbell Avenue, and within a small residential neighborhood between Downtown Campbell and the Los Gatos Creek. The property is bordered by single -family properties in the R -1-6 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District. A small townhome community and the Lloyd Square Shopping Center are located across and down Page Street, respectively, as shown on the map, below:
2 The ADU is exempt from FAR and Lot Coverage per CMC Sec. 21.23.030.D (Floor area ratio and lot coverage).
9 Packet Pg. 62
PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval Page 3 of 9
Site History: The project site was previously constructed with a single -family residence, which was authorized a major remodel under a building permit issued in May 2022.
Unfortunately, the construction activity exceeded the scope of the issued permit and resulted in the demolition of existing walls and roofing, such that the project no longer constituted a remodel. As a result, the City stopped construction activity and the project was re -classified as a new single -family home, con sistent with Campbell’s Municipal Code.
The original structure was legally constructed but does not meet current zoning setbacks, with nearly a non -existent street-side setback and substandard front -setback.
As such, a building permit for a new home, even in the same location, cannot be issued because the non -conforming status ("grandfathering") of the residence had been extinguished due to its classification as a new house , consistent with Campbell’s Municipal Code. Staff evaluated potential solutions with the applicant, including the use of SB 9 or the rezoning of the property to Planned Development. Due to the limitations of SB 9, it does not apply to the property. In addition, the use of a Planned Development rezoning would constitute “spot zoning” and be an inappropriate means of exempting the project from typical zoning standards.
Planning Commission Action : The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this application at its meeting of February 14, 2023. As noted in the meeting minutes (reference Attachment C), much of the Planning Commission's discussion addressed public commentary on the application, which dealt with the design and intended use of the proposed structure. Staff confirmed that the structure, as presented, was determined to be a single -family dwelling with a JADU and an attached ADU, which constitutes a "housing development project" under the Housing Accountability Act. After public comment and due deliberation, the Planning Commission took action to approve the Variance by a 4-1-1-1 vote (Commissioner Kamkar voting no, Commissioner Zisser abstaining, and Commissioner Ching absent).
Appeal: A timely appeal was filed on February 23, 2023, by Brittany and Shaun Sozua on behalf of the "surrounding neighborhood" (reference Attachment D – Appeal Letter), which had the effect of staying the Planning Commission's approval subject to Council review.
9 Packet Pg. 63
PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval Page 4 of 9
ANALYSIS
Response to Appeal : The appellants' letter makes several assertions as to why the Variance approval should be reconsidered, as excerpted in italics, below. Each of these points is responded to by staff:
• We dispute this setback decision on the grounds that it is unprecedented…
By its very nature, a Variance is a rarely used tool intended to address physical limitations of an extr a-ordinary character. As such, its use in this situation reflects an unusual and atypical physical constraint on the subject property that generally does not exist on other properties in the R-1-6 Zoning District.
• [The approval is] in violation of the current State of California guidelines for building a new structure…. The City of Campbell’s dismissal of the legal setback rules instituted by the State of California at the expense of the safety and well -being of the current residents of the surrounding neighborhood is disappointing.
Setback requirements are generally the purview of local zoning codes, and therefore, the Variance is not a violation of State law. This notwithstanding, the State of California's most recent ADU legislation eliminated front -yard setback requirements for ADUs under 800 square-feet.
• [The] two exterior exits on the north side of the property, would be to the detriment of pedestrians along Maple Ave.
The exterior doors shown on the floorplan are 3 -ft wide and would therefore not swing into the sidewalk area. Neither the Building Code nor the Municipal Code prohibit doors from encroaching into the public sidewalk and t here is also no objective standard pertaining to the number and/or size of doors on residential structures.
• The current rules for setbacks require 12 feet from the property line along a street and yet the city is cutting this by three quarters on the grounds that there is no such thing as an 11 -foot house. This is, in fact, incorrect. Many Tiny Homes are 11 feet wide. In fact, if the city had considered a 9 -foot variance, the house could then be 14 feet wide, which is the width of the average mobile home.
A Variance is designed to allow a disadvantaged property owner to develop in a manner consistent with properties i n the same zoning district. Property owners within the R -1-6 Zoning District are entitled to a primary dwelling of reasonable size and an ADU and JADU. In this regard, the Variance would allow relief to the street-side setback that would result in a buildi ng envelope that is proportionally as wide as a conforming corner R-1-6 lot (as discussed, in Finding # 4, below)
9 Packet Pg. 64
PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval Page 5 of 9 Although the appellants are correct that "tiny homes" are quite narrow, most such models are on wheels that are more akin to a camper or trai ler rather than a constructed dwelling. Similarly, the appellants are also correct that a less significant reduction in the street -side setback could accommodate a dwelling comparable in width to a mobile home or smaller ADU, however, again, such dwellings are not comparable to a traditional single-family dwelling.
• If a compromise is necessary, we would ask that the planning commission consider a lesser setback on the north property line…Please consider our request that we are met at a minimum half way an d force the owner to seek a 6 foot variance on the north side (Maple Avenue). A 3-foot setback is not acceptable.
As discussed in the findings analysis, below, allowing for a 3 -ft setback would provide for a 20-ft wide building envelope, which is a reasonable minimum for a primary dwelling unit. If the structure were smaller, it begins to resemble an ADU or attached townhome rather than traditional single -family dwelling as allowed in the R -1-6 Zoning District. For reference, some cities have codified that all new homes must be at least 20-feet in width (see Blythe, CA). The proposed 3-ft setback is greater than the 1 ½ -ft setback of the former residence.
• We would like to point out that the owner of 68 Page Street bought the property knowing the dimensions of both the property and the existing structure. Perhaps more research into the current laws and regulations regarding setbacks should have been considered when purchasing said property.
If the applicant had not exceeded the scope of the building permit and demolished the former structure, he would have been able to construct an addition (including an attached ADU) along the existing 1 ½ -ft setback line without a Variance under the Zoning Code's non-conforming ("grandfathering") provisions.
• With an ADU and a main residence set to be occupied by the owner and his parents and the JDU to be possibly rented out at a going market price that far exceeds any subsidized housing costs, a property and dwelling of this size does very little to help the housing crisis currently facing California, as suggested by the commission.
The assumed level of affordability of the proposed housing units and their relationship to regional housing needs is not a consideration in the Variance findings. As documented through regional studies accepted by the State Department of Housing and Community Development, the small-scale housing units proposed by this application are "affordable by design" due to their limited size, and can contribute to the City’s RHNA.
9 Packet Pg. 65
PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval Page 6 of 9 Variance Findings: Findings establish the evidentiary basis for a City's decision to grant or deny a land use approval and to imp ose conditions of approval as necessary to establish the findings. The City's findings for a Variance are based on the State's statutory requirements for a Variance found in Government Code § 65906 . The following are findings provided in the administrative record that supported the Planning Commission's decision to approve the Variance application. The applicant has also provided a findings analysis in support of the Variance request, provided as Attachment E.
1. The strict or literal interpretations and enforcement of the specified regulation(s) would result in a practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Zoning Code; Yes. Strict application of the setback requirements would physically preclude reasonable development of the property. As shown below, in the dashed blue line, the 12 -ft street-side setback in combination with the interior side setback, would result in an 11 -foot-wide building envelope. This is insufficient to allow for functional interior space necessary for a single-family dwelling to be constructed.
As a such, the proposed 3 -foot side setback, would alleviate the p hysical hardship by allowing a 20-foot-wide building, as shown in dashed red line.
The proposed 14 ½ foot front setback 3 would match the prior dwelling and allow retention of the existing detached garage and provision for a small amount of private open s pace, which otherwise would be eliminated if the building were shifted eastward (the presence of the ADU allows elimination of the required open space as necessary without a Variance). It should be noted that under recent State legislation ( AB 2221/SB 897 ), if the structure were reconfigured so that the ADU was located at the front of the house (facing Page Street), no front setback would apply at all.
2. The strict or literal interpretations and enforcement of the specified regulation(s) would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties classified in the same zoning district.
3 This setback is being measured to the front building wall. A condition of approval wi ll require that the front porch overhang be reduced in depth to 30-inches, in compliance with CMC Sec. 21.18.040.B.1 (Architectural features), so that it may encroach into the proposed 14 ½ -ft front setback. 9 Packet Pg. 66
PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval Page 7 of 9 Yes. Without relief to t he aforementioned setback standards, the property owner would be unable to gain reasonable use of the property for a single -dwelling, ADU, and JADU as permitted by State law in all single -family residential zoning districts.
3. There are exceptional or extra ordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the subject property (i.e., size, shape, topography) which do not apply generally to other properties classified in the same zoning district;
Yes. This parcel was created as part of the CR & GW Page Subdiv ision, recorded on April 15, 1907, which was subsequently reconfigured by the Los Palos tract, recorded on March 18, 1940 (reference Attachment F – Tract Maps). At the time of these subdivisions, the subject parcel was 38 -feet wide, slightly narrower than the prevalent 40 -foot lot width of properties along Maple Avenue. It appears that from historic Sanborn Maps (reference Attachment G) that these two properties were functionally used as a single property with one principal dwelling, located on what is now 62 Page Street. Subsequently a previous property owner transferred 10 -feet of property from 68 Page Street to 62 Page Street, widening the latter property to 50-feet and narrowing the subject property to 28 -feet. This likely occurred to allow separate conv eyance of 68 Page Street, while retaining the home on 62 Page Street.
As a result, in comparison to the development standards of the R -1-6 (Single - Family Residential) Zoning District, as per the table, below, the subject property is 57% of the minimum lot size (3,415 sq. ft. v. than 6,000 sq. ft.) and 46% of the minimum lot width (28 -ft v. 60 ft.). The property is also narrower than other properties down Page Street (40 -feet) and properties found in the broader neighborhood (50-ft). Moreover, the property' s depth-to-width ratio is 4.28 (120 ft. ÷ 28 ft.) compared to 1.6 of the standard R-1-6 lot (100 ft. ÷ 60 ft.). In total, the subject property is particularly narrow and small as compared to both properties within the immediate neighborhood and as compared to a "typical" R-1-6 lot.
Metrics R-1-6
(Typical Lot)
Neighborhood Typical Lot 32-56 Page St. Lots Subject Property Lot Size 6,000 sq. ft. 6,200 sq. ft. 4,800 sq. ft. 3,415 sq. ft.
Lot Width 60-ft 50-ft 40-ft 28-ft
Lot Depth 100-ft 125-ft 120-ft 120-ft
Depth-to-Width
Ratio
1.6 (100 ft. ÷ 60 ft.).
2.5 (125 ft. ÷ 50 ft.).
3 (120 ft. ÷ 40 ft.).
4.28 (120 ft. ÷ 28 ft.)
4. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties cla ssified in the same zoning district; and
As noted, this property presents unusual site constraints (usually narrow and small) not commonly found within the R -1-6 Zoning District. The proposed setback reductions are the minimal necessary to allow reasonable use of the property. Moreover, the overall 9 Packet Pg. 67
PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval Page 8 of 9 development intensity of the project, as measured by floor area ratio (FAR) and Lot Coverage is consistent with what otherwise would be allowed by the R -1-6 Zoning District, such that the proposed structure is proportional to its area.
This is specifically evidenced by the portion of the property that would be consumed by the street-side and interior setbacks in comparison with a "typical" R -1-6 corner lot. The proposed setbacks total 8-feet (3-ft + 5-ft), constituting 28% of the lot width (8-ft ÷ 28-ft).
This is equal to standard R -1-6 properties, where the standard street -side (12 -ft) and interior (5-ft) setbacks also constitute 28% of the lot width (17 -ft ÷ 60-ft). This results in both the subject property and a "typical" R -1-6 corner lot having a building envelope that's width is equal to 72% of the lot width. As such, the proposed Variance would not confer any special advantage to the applicant.
5. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the pub lic health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Yes. The addition of new residents to the neighborhood does not impair the public health or safety. Parking, the project site is located within one -half mile of the Downtown Campbell Light Rail station, where the city cannot enforce any minimum parking requirements under AB-2097.
PUBLIC COMMENT
The City sent mailed "courtesy" and legal public hearing notices to n eighboring residents and utilized an em ail interest list . Emails received from nearby residents are included as Attachment H . Some of the correspondence questions whether the proposed structure is truly a single -family residence rather than a "boarding house" or "group home". Although in the in itial application review staff shared these concerns, determining that the original interior configuration more closely resembled a "lodging house" or "rooming and boarding house," rather than a single -family dwelling, the floorplan layout was subsequently modified so that the structure now incorporates a JADU and ADU, as permitted by State law, and is not designed as a "boarding house".
FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with the City Council’s consideration of this Variance appeal.
Prepared by:
Daniel Fama, Senior Planner
9 Packet Pg. 68
PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval Page 9 of 9 Reviewed by:
Rob Eastwood, Community
Development Director
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. Draft Resolution
b. Project Plans
c. PC Meeting Minutes (2023-02-14)
d. Appeal Letter
e. Applicant Variance Statement
f. Tract Maps
g. Sanborn Map
h. Public Comment
9 Packet Pg. 69
RESOLUTION NO. ____
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CAMPBELL DENYING AN APPEAL AND UPHOLDING PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO ALLOW
CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 1,053 SQUARE -FOOT
ONE-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING, INCLUSIVE OF A 313
SQUARE-FOOT JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (JADU),
WITH A 529 SQUARE-FOOT ATTACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNIT (ADU), WITH SUBSTANDARD FRONT - AND STREET -SIDE
SETBACKS, INCLUDING RETENTION OF AN EXISTING
DETACHED NON -CONFORMING GARAGE FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 68 PAGE STREET. FILE NO.: PLN-2022-101
After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the City Council of the City of Campbell does find as follows:
1. The Project Site is zoned R-1-6 (Single-Family Residential – 6,000 sq. ft. min. lot size ) on the City of Campbell Zoning Map.
2. The Project Site is designated Low Density Residential (<6 units/gr. acre) on the City of Campbell General Plan Land Use diagram.
3. The Project Site is a 3,415 square-foot residential parcel located at southeast corner of Page Street and Maple Avenue.
4. The Project Site is developed with a partially constructed d welling, which was an unpermitted reconstruction of a prior dwelling.
5. The Proposed Project is an application for a Variance to allow construction of a single - family dwelling, inclusive of a junior ac cessory dwelling unit (JADU), with an attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU), at a substandard front setback back of approximately 14 ½ feet and street-side setback of 3-feet.
6. The Project Site, in comparison to the development standards of the R-1-6 (Singl e- Family Residential – 6,000 sq. ft. min. lot size) Zoning District is 57% of the minimum lot size (3,415 sq. ft. v. than 6,000 sq. ft.) and 46.5% of the minimum lot width (28 -ft v. 60 ft.). As a result, the Project Site's Depth-to-Width ratio is 4.28 (120 ft. ÷ 28 ft.) compared to 1.6 of the standard R-1-6 lot (100 ft. ÷ 60 ft.), rendering it unusually narrow.
7. The configuration of proposed structure does not constitute a "lodging house" or "rooming and boarding hous e" in that the structure has three distinct dwelling types: a primary dwelling, a junior accessory dwelling unit ( JADU), and accessory dwelling unit (ADU), each with separate kitchen and bathroom facilities.
8. The proposed front setback would match the setback of the prior residence and the proposed street-side setback would exceed the setback of the prior residence.
9.a
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) City Council Resolution Page 2 of 3
68 Page Street ~ Variance Appeal (PLN-2022-101)
9. Requiring conformance with a 12-foot street-side setback and a 20-foot front setback, in combination with the interior side setback, would preclude construction of a single-family dwelling by resulting in an 11-foot-wide building envelope.
10. The setback reduction is the minimum necessary deviation from the applicable development standards necessary for the property owner to enjoy use of the property in the same manner as owners of other properties classified in the same zoning district.
11. Allowing a setback reduction commensurate with the substandard lot width recognizes that this unusual parcel condition does not generally apply to comparably zoned properties.
12. Approval of a Variance does not relieve the property owners from the requirements of the Chapter 21.23 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of the Campbell Municipal Code.
13. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the Conditions of Approval and the impacts of the project.
14. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the Proposed Project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment.
15. The Proposed Project is not subject to a parking requirement pursuant Government Code § 65863.2, which precludes the City from imposing or enforcing a parking requirement for a development project located within one-half mile of public transit. The Project Site is within one-half mile of the Downtown Campbell Light-Rail Station.
16. In consideration of the aforementioned findings in support of the Variance, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 4663 at its meeting of February 14, 2023, granting approval of the Proposed Project.
17. A timely appeal of the Planning Commission's action to approve to the Proposed Project was received on February 23, 2023.
18. The appeal did not contend an error in fact, dispute of findings, or inadequacy of conditions to mitigate potential project impacts nor was accompanied by supporting evidence substantiating the basis for the appeal.
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact and pursuant, the City Council further finds and concludes that:
Variance Findings (CMC Sec. 21.48.040.B)
1. The strict or literal interpretations and enforcement of the specified regulation(s) would result in a practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Zoning Code.
2. The strict or literal interpretations and enforcement of the specified regulation(s) would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties classified in the same zoning district.
9.a
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) City Council Resolution Page 3 of 3
68 Page Street ~ Variance Appeal (PLN-2022-101)
3. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the subject property (i.e. size, shape, topography) which do not apply generally to other properties classified in the same zoning district.
4. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zoning district.
5. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the area.
Environmental Findings (CMC Sec. 21.38.050):
1. The project is Categorically Exempt under Section 15303, Class 3 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pertaining to the construction of single -family dwellings.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council denies an appeal and upholds the Planning Commission's approval of a Variance to allow construction of an approximately 1,053 square -foot one -story single -family dwelling, inclusive of a 313 square -foot junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU), with a 529 square -foot attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU), with substandard front - and street -side setbacks (14 ½ -ft and 3 -ft respectively), including retention of an existing detached non -conforming garage, for property located at 68 Page Street, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (attached Exhibit "A").
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ________________, 2023, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
APPROVED:
Anne Bybee, Mayor
ATTEST:
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk
9.a
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval)
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Variance (PLN-2022-101)
Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1. Approved Project: Approval is granted for a Variance to allow construction of a single - family dwelling, inclusive of a junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU), with an attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU), at a substandard front setback back of approximately 14 ½ feet and street -side setback of 3 -feet, on property located at 68 Page Street . The project shall substantially conform to the Project Plans included as Attachment B of the City Council Staff Report dated March 21, 2 023, except as may be modified by the Conditions of Approval herein.
2. Permit Expiration: The Variance approved herein shall be valid for one year from the date of City Council action. Within this one-year period, an application for the Building Permit must be submitted. Failure to meet this deadline or expiration of the Building Permit plan check or issued Building Permit will result in the Variance being rendered void.
3. Planning Final Required : Planning Division clearance is required prior to final Building Permit clearance. Construction not in substantial compliance with the appro ved project plans shall not be approved without prior authorization of the necessary approving body.
4. Required Revisions : The front porch eave shall be reduced in depth to 30-inches, in compliance with CMC Sec. 21.18.040.B.1 (Architectural features).
5. Minor Revisions: Architectural refinements and other minor revisions to the Approved Project Plans may be administratively approved by the Community Development Director pursuant to CMC Sec. 21.56.060.
6. Municipal Code Conformance : Approval of a Variance do es not relieve the property owners from the requirements of Chapter 21.23 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of the Campbell Municipal Code.
7. Expansion: The approved structure shall not be permitted to exercise the setback exception for non-conforming structures provided for in Section 21.58.050.F (Exceptions). Any expansion of the structure shall conform to all applicable development standards for the R-1-6 Zoning District.
8. Water Efficient Landscape Standards : As a new construction pro ject with a total project landscape area equal to or less than 2,500 square feet, this project is subject to the updated California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) and may comply with the Prescriptive Compliance Option in Appendix D. This document is
9.a
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) Conditions of Approval – 68 Page St. Page 2 of 5 PLN-2022-101 ~ Variance
available at: http://www.cityofcampbell.com/DocumentCenter/View/176 or on the Planning Division’s Zoning and Land Use webpage through www.cityofcampbell.com.
The building permit application submittal shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable MWELO and landscaping requirements and shall include the following:
a. Planting and Irrigation Plans that meet all requirements of the Prescriptive Compliance Option in Appendix D.
b. A completed Landscape Information Form.
c. A note on the Cover Sheet in minimum 1/2” high lettering stating “Planning Final Required. The new landscaping indicated on the plans must be installed prior to final inspection. Changes to the landscaping plan require Planning approval.”
9. Fences/Walls: Any newly proposed fencing and/or walls shall comply with Campbell Municipal Code Section 21.18.060 and shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department.
10. On-Site Lighting: On-site lighting shall be shielded away from adjacent properties and directed on site. The design and type of lighting fixtures and lighting intensity o f any proposed exterior lighting for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to installation of the lighting for compliance with all applicable Conditions of Approval, ordinances, laws and regulations. Lighting fixtures shall be of a decorative design to be compatible with the residential development and shall incorporate energy saving features.
11. Contractor Contact Information Posting : The project site shall be posted with the name and contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the issuance of building permits.
12. Construction Activities: The applicant shall abide by the following requirements during construction:
a. The project site shall be posted with the name and contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the issuance of building permits.
b. Construction activities shall be limited to weekdays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. and Saturdays between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. No construction shall take place on Sundays or holidays unless an exception is granted by the Building Official. c. All construction equipment with internal combustion engines used on the project site shall be properly muffled and maintained in good working condition. d. Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines shall be strictly prohibited. e. All stationary noise-generating construction equipment, such as air compressors and portable power generators, shall be located as far as possible from noise -sensitive receptors such as existing residences and businesses.
f. Use standard dust and erosion control measures that comply with the adopted Best Management Practices for the City of Campbell.
9.a
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) Conditions of Approval – 68 Page St. Page 3 of 5 PLN-2022-101 ~ Variance
13. Construction Hours/Fines/Stop Work Notice : Failure to comply with permitted working hours that result in verified complaints may result in the issuance of a Stop Work Notice issued to the project with cessation of work for a minimum of seven (7) days from the date of issuance and an Administrative fine of up to $1,000.00.
14. Timely Completion: Once under construction it shall be the obligation of the property owner and contractor to demonstrate continued progress on the project. In the event the building permit expires, the City may impose fines or exercise administrative remedies to compel timely completion of work.
Building Division
15. Permit Required: A Building Permit application shall be required for the proposed project.
The Building Permit shall include Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical fees when such work is part of the permit.
16. Conditions of Approval: The Conditions of Approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet of construction plans submitted for building permit.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
17. Scope of Review : The scope of this project triggers the requirement for Frontage Improvements as required by Campbell Municipal Code 11.24.040. The City has recently installed an ADA curb ramp at the corner of Page Street and Maple Avenue, relieving the applicant of that work. However, the existing curb and sidewalk along the Page Street frontage is in poor condition and will need to be reconstructed as part of this project. The new curb shall also be painted red to limit parking at the corner of the intersection. The existing water meter box is damaged and will need to be replaced as part of the sidewalk work. If a new water service is required due to the fire sprinkler requirements, then the new water meter shall be installed on the property, behind the right-of-way line – similar to the sanitary sewer cleanout.
18. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to issuance of any building permits for the site, the applicant shall pay the required Storm Drain Area fee, currently set at $2,120.00 per net acre, which is $168.54 (set for R-1 land use).
19. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara Valley Water District requirements, and the Campbell Municipal Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff to the bay.
Resources to achieve these objectives include Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment (“CA BMP Handbook”) by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection (“Start at the Source”) by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwater Quality: A Companion Document to Start at the Source (“Using Site Design Techniques”) by BASMAA, 2003.
9.a
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) Conditions of Approval – 68 Page St. Page 4 of 5 PLN-2022-101 ~ Variance
20. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Any new water meter(s) and sewer cleanout(s) shall be installed on private property behind the public right-of-way line.
21. Pavement Restoration: The applicant shall restore the pavement in compliance with City standard requirements. Both Page Street and Maple Avenue have recently received a pavement treatment, and as such the project will be subject to the City’s Street Cut Moratorium. Any new pavement cuts will require the applicant to perform enhanced pavement restoration consistent with the restoration requirements associated with the Street Cut Moratorium. The City’s Pavement Maintenance Program website (https://www.ci.campbell.ca.us/219) has detailed information on the streets currently under moratorium and the enhanced restoration requirements.
22. Plans / Encroachment Permit / Fees / Deposits: Prior to issuance of any building permits for the site, the applicant shall cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer:
a. Show location of all existing utilities within the new and existing public right of way. b. Remove existing curb and sidewalk along the Page Street frontage and construct City standard curb, gutter, and sidewalk consistent with the recently constructed ADA ramp improvements at the corner of Page and Maple.
c. Paint curb red along the Page Street frontage.
d. Install new water meter box to grade – if this water meter is to remain.
Otherwise, install new water meter on private property behind the right -of-way line.
e. Fix any broken sidewalk along project frontage.
f. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary.
23. Street Improvements Completed for Occupancy and Building Permit Final: Prior to allowing occupancy and/or final building permit signoff, the applicant shall have the required street improvements installed and accepted by the City.
24. Maintenance of Landscaping: Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height.
25. Utility Encroachment Permit: Separate encroachment permits for the installation of utilities to serve the development will be required (including water, sewer, gas, electric, etc.). Applicant shall apply for and pay all necessary fees for utility permits for sanitary sewer, gas, water, electric and all other utility work.
9.a
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) Conditions of Approval – 68 Page St. Page 5 of 5 PLN-2022-101 ~ Variance
FIRE DEPARTMENT
26. Formal Plan Review: Review of this development proposal is limited to accessibility of site access and water supply as they pertain to fire department operations, and shall not be construed as a substitute for formal plan review to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Prior to performing any work the applicant shall make application to, and receive from, the Building Division all applicable construction permits.
27. Fire Sprinklers Required : In all new one - and two-family dwellings. Note on Sheet A -1 that an aut omatic sprinkler system shall be installed as a deferred submittal. Note will need to be added to the building permit plan set.
28. Required Fire Flow: The fire flow for this project is 500 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure since an automatic fire sprinkler sys tem will be installed. Note: The minimum required number and spacing of the hydrants shall be in accordance with CFC Table C102.1.
Letter received. Hydrant is capable of meeting fire flow.
29. Construction Site Fire Safety : All construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of the CFC Chapter 33 and our Standard Detail and Specification S1 -7.
Provide appropriate notations on subsequent plan submittals, as appropriate to the project. CFC Chp. 33.
30. Water Supply Requ irements: Potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination caused by fire protection water supplies. It is the responsibility of the applicant and any contractors and subcontractors to contact the water purveyor supplying the site of such project, and to comply with the requirements of that purveyor.
Such requirements shall be incorporated into the design of any water -based fire protection systems, and/or fire suppression water supply systems or storage containers that may be physically connecte d in any manner to an appliance capable of causing contamination of the potable water supply of the purveyor of record. Final approval of the system(s) under consideration will not be granted by this office until compliance with the requirements of the water purveyor of record are documented by that purveyor as having been met by the applicant(s). 2019 CFC Sec. 903.3.5 and Health and Safety Code 13114.7.
31. Address identification : New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Where required by the fire code official, address numbers shall be provided in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Address numbers shall be Arabic numbers or alphabetical letters. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches (101.6 mm) high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inch (12.7 mm). Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other sign or means shall be used to identify the structure. Address numbers shall be maintained. CFC Sec. 505.1.
9.a
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Draft Resolution (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 112
191.85
SSMH
122
191.50
GL-2" PAINT
127
191.91
WLK
128
191.97
BW
129
191.68
TBC130
191.60
FL
134
191.77
WLK<
135
191.71
TBC
136
191.39
FL
139
191.72
WLK<
143
191.85
BW<
146
191.74
10"TR
150
191.54
TBC
161
191.79
END 3'CLF-BW
162
191.76
BW-GTE
163
191.65
WLK<
164
191.64
WLK<
165
191.54
TBC-C<
166
191.54
TBC-C<
167
191.01
FL
186
191.70
BW-DWY
187
191.72
BW-DWY
189
191.64
WLK
190
191.75
BW
191
191.73
END 3'CLF-BW
212
191.91
6'WDF<
215
192.40
HSE<
221
191.97
G
224
191.96
6'WDF
242
191.74
BW-GTE243
191.92
BRCK PATIO
244
192.07
BRCK PATIO<
245
192.00
HSE<
256
191.80
6'WDF
257
191.78
261
191.54
SHED<
262
191.63
SHED<
263
191.69 265
191.81
266
191.90
G
267
192.07
6'WDF
268
192.15
GAR<
271
191.93
SLAB
272
191.66
6'WDF
273
191.60
GAR<
274
191.67
GAR<
275
191.72
6'WDF-T
276
191.79
G
(E) NON-CONFORMING
2 CAR GARAGE
329 S.F.
(N) 1 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
740 S.F.
25'
CENTER OF STREET
SYNTHETIC
TURF AREA
20'-1"4' 4'-3"
4'-3"
3'-11"
1'-9"
1'-6"
(E) WOOD
FENCE
H: 6'-0"
(E) WOOD FENCE
H: 6'-0"
(E) WOOD FENCE
H: 6'-0"
(E) IRON WROUGHT RAIL
H: 3'-0"
16'-4"
11'-7"
5'
(N) ELECTRICAL
METER
(E) GAS
METER
CURB
CURB
112
191.85
SSMH
122
191.50
GL-2" PAINT
127
191.91
WLK
128
191.97
BW
129
191.68
TBC130
191.60
FL
134
191.77
WLK<
135
191.71
TBC
136
191.39
FL
139
191.72
WLK<
143
191.85
BW<
146
191.74
10"TR
150
191.54
TBC
161
191.79
END 3'CLF-BW
162
191.76
BW-GTE
163
191.65
WLK<
164
191.64
WLK<
165
191.54
TBC-C<
166
191.54
TBC-C<
167
191.01
FL
186
191.70
BW-DWY
187
191.72
BW-DWY
189
191.64
WLK
190
191.75
BW
191
191.73
END 3'CLF-BW
198
191.95
BW
199
192.35
WLK
200
192.43
WLK
201
192.39
WLK
202
192.37
WLK
203
192.43
WLK<
204
192.31
WLK<
205
192.19
WS
206
192.58
STP
207
192.54
STP<
208
193.01
STP<
209
193.05
STP
210
192.93
STP
211
192.88
STP<
212
191.91
6'WDF<
213
193.53
FF
214
192.19
HSE<
215
192.40
HSE<
217
192.24
G
218
192.34
STP<
219
192.38
STP
220
191.68
G
221
191.97
G
224
191.96
6'WDF
231
191.68
WLK
232
191.64
233
191.48
WLK
234
191.43
WLK<
235
191.48
WLK<
236
191.49
WLK<
237
191.60
WLK<
238
191.61
WLK<
239
191.80
WLK<
240
191.73
WLK<
241
191.67
WLK<
242
191.74
BW-GTE243
191.92
BRCK PATIO
244
192.07
BRCK PATIO<
245
192.00
HSE<
246
192.10
HSE<
248
192.64
STP<
249
193.11
STP<
250
193.54
FF
251
193.05
HSE<
252
192.03
4x4
253
191.87
4x6
254
191.90
4x6
255
191.90
4x6
256
191.80
6'WDF
257
191.78
258
191.69
259
191.58
SHED<
260
191.92
FF
261
191.54
SHED<
262
191.63
SHED<
263
191.69 265
191.81
266
191.90
G
267
192.07
6'WDF
268
192.15
GAR<
271
191.93
SLAB
272
191.66
6'WDF
273
191.60
GAR<
274
191.67
GAR<
275
191.72
6'WDF-T
276
191.79
G
(E) STORAGE
TO BE REMOVED
105 S.F.
(E) 1 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
622 S.F.
25'
CENTER OF STREET
(E) SOD
(E) SOD
(E) SOD
(E) SOD(E) SOD
(E) SOD
(E) SOD
20'-1"4' 4'-3"
4'-3"
3'-11"
1'-9"
1'-6"(E) WOOD FENCE
H: 6'-0"
TO BE REMOVED
(E) WOOD
FENCE
H: 6'-0"
(E) WOOD FENCE
H: 6'-0"
(E) WOOD FENCE
H: 6'-0"
(E) IRON WROUGHT RAIL
H: 3'-0"
16'-4"
6'-9"
10'-3"
34'-10"36'-0"
14'-7"
18'-0"
1'-7"
8'-6"
(E) GAS
METER
CURB
CURB
(E) PATIO
TO BE REMOVED
204 S.F.
31'-8"
10'-2"
26'
PROPOSED A.D.U. 529 S.F.
(E) NON-CONFORMING
2 CAR GARAGE
329 S.F.
(E) CONC.
DRIVEWAY
33 S.F.
(N) CONC. PAVE (E) SOD
PRIVATE
OPEN AREA
256 S.F
3'
EAVE LINE EAVE LINE
TRASH
RECEPTACLE
BEHIND FENCE
A/C BEHIND
FENCE
(N) PORCH
61 S.F.
3'
20'-3"3'
(N) CONC. PAVE
SYNTHETIC
TURF AREA
LATIN NAME: ACACIA COGNATA
COMMON NAME: BOWER WATTLE
25 GALLON
PROPOSED TREES/VINES
REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN
PROPOSED TREES/VINES
REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN
PROPOSED TREES/VINES
REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN
PROPOSED TREES/VINES
REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN
(N) 1 STORY
J.A.D.U.
313 S.F.
7'-8"
12'-8"
12'-11"7'-4"
ON SAME DWG. FOR DESCRIPTIONXX KEY NOTE, REFER TO LISTING
DRAWING WHERE ELEVATION IS DRAWN
INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONX
XX.X
X
XX.X
REVISION CALLOUT
AC.T. -ACOUSTICTILE
AFF -ABOVE FINISH FLOOR
BLDG -BUILDING
BLK -BLOCK
BMT -BOTTOM
C.B. -CATCHBASIN
CEM -CEMENT
CER.T. -CERAMIC TILE
C.J. -CONTROL JOINT
CLR. -CLEAR
CLG -CEILING
CONC. -CONCRETE
CONSTR. -CONSTRUCTION
CONT. -CONTINUOUS
CONTR. -CONTRACTOR
CTR. -CENTER
DET. -DETAIL
DIA. -DIAMETER
DIM -DIMENSION
D.O. -DOOR OPENING
DWG -DRAWING
ELEV. -ELEVATION
EXT -EXTERIOR
F.F. -FINISH FLOOR
F.G. -FINISH GRADE
FIN -FINISH
FLR -FLOOR
FDN -FOUNDATION
FTG -FOOTING
FURR -FURRING
GEN -GENERAL
HYD -HYDRANT
INSUL -INSULATION
LAV -LAVATORY
LT -LIGHT
MAR -MARBLE
MAS -MASONRY
MAX -MAXIMUM
MECH. -MECHANICAL
MIN. -MINIMUM
MISC. -MISCELLANEOUS
NO -NUMBER
O/C -ON CENTER
O.D. -OUTSIDE DIAMETER
O/O -OUT TO OUT
OPNG -OPENING
PLYWD -PLYWOOD
PTD -PAINTED
R.D. -ROOF DRAIN
REINF. -REINFORCEMENT
REQD. -REQUIRED
STD -STANDARD
T.O.P. -TOP OF PLATE
TYP -TYPICAL
VCT -VINYL COMPOSITION TILE
WD -WOOD
WT -WEIGHT
(N) -NEW
(E) -EXISTING
A.P.N. 279-46-021 YEAR BUILT 1915 ZONING R-1-6 OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-3/U
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-B
STORIES : 1
LOT SIZE 3415 S.F.
EXISTING:
(E) FLOOR AREA 622 S.F. (E) 1 CAR GARAGE 329 S.F.
(E) STORAGE TO BE REMOVED 105 S.F.
(E) PATIO TO BE REMOVED 204 S.F.
PROPOSED:
(N) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 740 S.F.
(N) PORCH 61 S.F. (E) 2 CAR GARAGE 329 S.F.
(N) ATTACHED J.A.D.U. 313 S.F.
(N) ATTACHED A.D.U. 529 S.F.
LOT COVERAGE=(740+61+329)/3415=1130/3415=33.09%
FAR=740/3415=21.67%
ON SAME DWG. FOR DESCRIPTION
KEY NOTE, REFER TO LISTING
WALL SECTION NUMBER
DRAWING WHERE SECTION IS DRAWN
REVISION CALLOUT
WINDOW SYMBOL
DOOR NUMBER
X PHOTOGRAPH DIAGRAMS
ALAN GAO
135 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE SUITE 200 , BREA ,CA 92821
(626)-899-6108
CONSULTANT INFOR.PROJECT DATA
SCOPE OF WORK
SYMBOL LEGEND ABBREVATIONS
DETAIL NUMBER
DRAWING WHERE DETAIL IS DRAWN
OWNER
NAME YANJUN WANG
PHONE 408-883-5533
ADDRESS 68 PAGE ST, CAMPBELL, CA 95008
VICINITY MAP
DESIGNER
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
SHEET INDEX
A-1. COVER SHEET, (E) SITE PLAN, PROPOSED SITE PLAN A-2. FLOOR AREA PLAN, PROPOSED STREETSCAPE ELEVATIONS A-3. (E) FLOOR PLANS, PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
A-4. (E) ELEVATIONS, PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
A-5. (E) ROOF PLAN, PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
A-6. SECTIONS
NORTH
SITE
SPECIFICATION
LEGEND
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS
PRIOR TO ANY WORK AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK AND MATERIALS INCLUDING THAT FURNISHED BY SUBCONTRACTORS.
2. DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER DRAWINGS; DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS TO DETERMINE ANY LOCATION. THE OWNER OR DESIGNER SHALL
BE NOTIFIED IF ANY DISCREPANCY OCCURS PRIOR TO CONTINUING WITH WORK.
3. ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE FROM CENTER LINE OF STUD OR FACE OF FINISH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
4. ANY CHANGES PRIOR TO APPROVED SET OF PLANS, 168CAD BUILDING DESIGN MUST BE NOTIFIED. CONTRACTOR OR PERSON CONDUCTING WORK SHOULD NOTIFY 168CAD BUILDING DESIGN IF ANY DISCREPANCY OCCURS DURING CONSTRUCTION. 168CAD BUILDING DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR OR HOME BUILDER PERFORMANCE TO PERFORM WORK.
5. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES AND LOCAL RESTRICTIONS.
6. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ALL
EXISTING MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SERVICES AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT, AND TO PROTECT THEM FROM DAMAGE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR ALL EXPENSE OR REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT
OF UTILITIES OR OTHER PROPERTY DAMAGED BY OPERATIONS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OR
REMEDY OF ANY FAULTY, IMPROPER OR INTERIOR MATERIALS OR WORKMANSHIP WHICH SHALL APPEAR WITHIN (1) YEAR OR AS OTHERWISE
SPECIFIED FOR A SPECIFIC COMPONENT AFTER THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT.
8. SILICONE CAULK SHALL BE USED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS INCLUDING BUT LIMITED TO:
1. METAL DOOR AND WALL CONNECTION
2. CONDUIT AND PIPE PENETRATIONS AT WALLS AND CEILING.
3. JUNCTION OF MILLWORK (CABINETS, SHELVES, BOOTHS).
4. STAINLESS STEEL TO WALLS
DO NOT CAULK ANY OTHER AREAS, ESPECIALLY AT GREYWOOD
9. CONTRACTOR IS TO CLEAN WORK AREAS ON A DAILY BASIS SO AS NOT TO ACCUMULATE DEBRIS.
10. UPON PROJECT COMPLETION CONTRACTOR IS TO CLEAN WORK AREAS AND
JOB SITE THOROUGHLY SO AS TO REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DUST, RESIDUE, AND DEBRIS.
11. DO NOT OBSTRUCT STREETS, SIDEWALKS, ALLEYS OR OTHER RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING PROPER PERMITS.
12. ALL WORK SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH QUALITY WORKMANSHIP OF THE HIGHEST INDUSTRY STANDARDS. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN
STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. MATERIALS AND METHODS SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE NATIONAL TRADE BOOK; I.E. TILE COUNCIL OF AMERICA
HANDBOOK FOR CERAMIC TILE INSTALLATION, ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK INSTITUTE, "QUALITY STANDARDS" ETC.
13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR JOB SAFETY, AND SHALL
TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO ENSURE SAFETY OF WORKS AND OCCUPANTS AT ALL TIMES.
14. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING THE HOURS OF 7:00 AM TO 6:00 PM, MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY. NO WORK IS TO OCCUR ON SUNDAYS OR HOLIDAYS.
15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL MINOR ITEMS WHICH
ARE OBVIOUSLY AND REASONABLE NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ANY
INSTALLATION.
16. MINIMUM FLAME SPREAD CLASSIFICATION OF INTERIOR FINISH SHALL
CONFORM TO THE BUILDING CODE AND LOCAL GOVERNING BUILDING CODES/ORDINANCES.
17. PROJECT SHALL CONFORM TO THE:
2019 CBC.
2019 CMC
2019 CPC
2019 CEC
2019 T-24
2020 LA COUNTY CRC
AND ALL CITY AND COUNTY LAWS AND ORDINANCES.
18. ADDITIONAL MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING PERMITS SHALL BE OBTAINED AS REQUIRED.
GENERAL NOTES
W (E) WATER METER
G GAS METER
P POWER POLE
S SEWER
D DOWN SPOUT
F FIRE HYDRANT
A/C AIR CONDITION
E (E) ELECTRICAL PANEL
COVER SHEET,
(E) SITE PLAN,
PROPOSED
SITE PLAN
A-1
1. (N) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 740 S.F. WITH (N) PORCH 61 S.F.
2. REPLACE ALL RUG TO WOOD FLOORING (SPV)
3. REPLACE ALL OUT SIDE WALL TO STUCCO
4. UPGRADE 50 AMP PANEL TO 200 AMP
5. REMOVE EXISTING PATIO AND STORAGE
6. PROPOSED A.D.U. 529 S.F.
7. PROPOSED J.A.D.U. 313 S.F.
SHEET TITLE
Sheet
PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS
REVISIONS
of Sheet
Drawn ALAN
Date 11/19/22
DATE NO.
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
IDEAS, DESIGNS AND ARRANGEMENTS
ARE, AND SHALL REMAIN, THE PROPERTY
OF 168CAD DESIGN NO PART SHALL BE
COPIED, REPRODUCED OR OTHERWISE
USED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE
OR IN PART, IN CONNECTION WITH ANY
OTHER WORK OR PROJECT WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF 168CAD VISUAL
CONTACT WITH THESE DRAWINGS AND/OR
SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONSTITUTE A
PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF
THESE RESTRICTIONS.
(N) 1 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
&A.D.U.&J.A.D.U.
68 PAGE ST
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
135 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE
SUITE 200,BREA,CA,92821
[email protected]
Tel: (626) 899-6108
www.168CAD.net
110/05/2022
THE OWNER HAS CHECKED
THE PLAN AND CONFIRMED
THAT THE PLAN IS CORRECT
OWNER
SIGNATURE____________________SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0"
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
N
W
NB ENGINEERING INC
[email protected]
(626) 269-9321
STRUCTURAL
NAME
EMAIL
PHONE
ENERGY
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
BLUE SEA DESIGN LLC.
17770 CASTLETON ST. # 589 CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748
(626) 810-3333
EG
G
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0"
(E) SITE PLAN
N
ANY TREE ON THE SITE: NO
(N) LAVA STONE
CONC.
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 A/C
1 1
1 1
1 9.b
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 740 S.F.
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
(N) 1 STORY
AREA OF WORK:
622 S.F.
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
(E) 1 STORY
329 S.F.
GARAGE
(E) 1 STORY
105 S.F.
STORAGE
(E) 1 STORY
14'-7" 22'-4" ± 28'-0"
5'-0"
20'-3"
3'
26'-0"
529 S.F.
A.D.U.
(N) 1 STORY
29'-8"
313 S.F.
J.A.D.U.
(N) 1 STORY
8'-0"
T.O.P
(E) F.F.
13'-8"
(E) BUILDING HEIGHT
T.O.R 4'-2"
GRADEGRADE1'-6"
MAPLE AVE. LOT
1'-7" 18'-0"
NEIGHBORLOT
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
LOT LOT
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
3'-0" 20'-3" 5'-0"
8'-6"
10'-0"
T.O.P
(N) F.F.
T.O.R
4'-7 1/2"
15'-3 1/2"
8"
(N) BUILDING HEIGHT
1056 S.F.
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
(N) 1 STORY
622 S.F.
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
(E) 1 STORY
14'-7"36'-0"10'-0"42'-2"
10'-0"
T.O.P
15'-3 1/2"
T.O.R 4'-7 1/2"
8'-0"
T.O.P
T.O.R
4'-2"
13'-8"
1'-6"GRADE
8"
(N) BUILDING HEIGHT
(E) BUILDING HEIGHT
(E) F.F.
(N) F.F.
14'-7"
PAGE ST.NEIGHBOR
78'-0"10'-2"16'-4"1'-6"
16'-4"1'-6"
1056 S.F.
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
(N) 1 STORY
204 S.F.
PATIO
(E) 1 STORY
329 S.F.
GARAGE
(E) 1 STORY
622 S.F.
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
(E) 1 STORY
1'-0"
5 12
62 PAGE ST. 590 MAPLE AVE.
MAPLE AVE. PAGE ST.
5'-8"
(N)
(N)
3'-8"
A.D.U.
1056 S.F.
A.D.U.
(N) 1 STORY
1'-0"
(N)
(N)
5'-8"
(N)
3'-8"
(N)
3'-8"
5'-8"
(N)
5'-8"
(N)
(N)
J.A.D.U. MAIN HOUSEJ.A.D.U.
3'-8"
(N)
SHEET TITLE
Sheet
PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS
REVISIONS
of Sheet
Drawn ALAN
Date 11/19/22
DATE NO.
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
IDEAS, DESIGNS AND ARRANGEMENTS
ARE, AND SHALL REMAIN, THE PROPERTY
OF 168CAD DESIGN NO PART SHALL BE
COPIED, REPRODUCED OR OTHERWISE
USED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE
OR IN PART, IN CONNECTION WITH ANY
OTHER WORK OR PROJECT WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF 168CAD VISUAL
CONTACT WITH THESE DRAWINGS AND/OR
SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONSTITUTE A
PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF
THESE RESTRICTIONS.
(N) 1 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
&A.D.U.&J.A.D.U.
68 PAGE ST
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
135 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE
SUITE 200,BREA,CA,92821
[email protected]
Tel: (626) 899-6108
www.168CAD.net
110/05/2022
THE OWNER HAS CHECKED
THE PLAN AND CONFIRMED
THAT THE PLAN IS CORRECT
OWNER
SIGNATURE____________________
NOT TO SCALE
FLOOR AREA PLAN
FLOOR AREA
PLAN,
PROPOSED
STREETSCAPE
ELEVATIONS
A-2
N
PROPOSED STREETSCAPE ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0"
PAGE ST. VIEW MAPLE AVE. VIEW
1 9.b
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) (E) LIVING (E) DINING (E) BEDROOM
(E) LAUNDRY
(E) CL.
(E) BATH
(E) KITCHEN
18'-0"
10'-8"7'-4"
36'-0"
9'-0" 6'-0" 8'-8" 9'-4" 3'-0"
36'-0"
12'-4"8'-8"15'-0"
18'-0"
13'-6"4'-6"
2'-10" 10'-8"
2'-6"
2'-2"
2'-10"
(E) PATIO
TO BE REMOVED
REF.
10'-0"
10'-0"
16'-0"
WALL LEGEND
(E) WALLS TO BE REMAIN
(E) WALLS TO BE REMOVED
1'-0" 1'-0"
TABLE
(E) CL.
(E) GARAGE
16'-4"
20'-1"
20'-1"
16'-4"
EXISTING OPERABLE DOOR
LOW E, INSULATEDA VINYL
KEY
1 WH
DIMENSION
TYPE FRAME MATERIAL
WINDOW SCHEDULE
KEY
1 WH
DIMENSION
MATERIALTYPE HARDWARE
DOOR SCHEDULE
NOTES:
ABOVE THE TUB AND SHOWER ON THE FLOOR PLAN OR INCLUDE IN THE WINDOW SCHEDULE ALL TEMPER GLAZING.
ALL SLIDING GLASS DOORS AND DOORS WITH GLASS SHOULD BE TEMPER GLASS. 2 6'-8"2'-8" SWING WOOD
4'-0"
WINDOW TYPE
A
WIDTH
REMARK
4'-0"
WOOD
LOW E, INSULATEDA VINYL2 2'-0"3'-0"
LOW E, INSULATEDA VINYL3 4'-0"6'-0"
6'-8"3'-0" SWING
HEIGHT
3 6'-8"2'-6" SWING WOOD
W3
REF.
W2
W2
(N) KITCHEN
(N) LIVING
W2
(N) BATH 3
(N) BEDROOM 2 J.A.D.U.
BEDROOM
W1 W1
21'-0"
10'-8" 10'-4" 7'-4" 11'-0" 12'-8"
5'-4" 2'-3" 5'-1" 3'-6" 5'-8" 1'-10" 2'-2" 6'-0" 4'-6"
23'-4"
5'-8"17'-8"19'-0"5'-8"
10'-8" 2'-10" 2'-10"1'-10"
WALL LEGEND
(N) WALLS PER STRUCTURAL PLAN
(E) WALLS TO BE REMAIN
W1
5'-4"
WASHER DRYER W.H.
2'-0"
W3
W3
BB
A-6
A A
A-6
(N) PORCH
5'-0"7'-3"
8'-6"
3'-0"
3'-0"
20'-3"
5'-2" 3'-4"
2'-2"6'-6"3'-11"2'-10"4'-10"
W1
1'-10"
(N) BEDROOM 1
(N) BEDROOM 2
(N) BATH 1
(N) BATH 2
W2W2
W1
20'-3"
W1
W1
D.W.
(N) KITCHEN
8'-8"11'-7"
6'-6"2'-2"1'-8"5'-11"4'-0"
8'-0" 3'-3"
WASHER
DRYER
26'-0"
26'-0"
11'-0" 15'-0"
3'-8" 5'-4" 9'-4" 7'-8"
5'-4" 5'-8" 15'-0"
2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-10" 2'-10"
7'-0" 12'-3"
A.D.U.J.A.D.U.
11'-3"
(N) BEDROOM 1
8'-6"
(N) BATH 1
J.A.D.U.
(N) KITCHEN
D.W.
WASHER
REF.
DRYER
5'-2"
J.A.D.U.
(N) BATH
J.A.D.U.MAIN HOUSE
A.D.U.J.A.D.U.J.A.D.U.HOUSE
MAIN
4'-0"
REF.
(N) BATH 2
31'-0"
28'-8"
5'-4" 7'-2" 5'-2" 5'-7" 8'-7" 5'-8" 4'-0" 6'-0"
3'-0" 4'-0" MIN.
SHEET TITLE
Sheet
PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS
REVISIONS
of Sheet
Drawn ALAN
Date 11/19/22
DATE NO.
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
IDEAS, DESIGNS AND ARRANGEMENTS
ARE, AND SHALL REMAIN, THE PROPERTY
OF 168CAD DESIGN NO PART SHALL BE
COPIED, REPRODUCED OR OTHERWISE
USED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE
OR IN PART, IN CONNECTION WITH ANY
OTHER WORK OR PROJECT WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF 168CAD VISUAL
CONTACT WITH THESE DRAWINGS AND/OR
SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONSTITUTE A
PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF
THESE RESTRICTIONS.
(N) 1 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
&A.D.U.&J.A.D.U.
68 PAGE ST
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
135 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE
SUITE 200,BREA,CA,92821
[email protected]
Tel: (626) 899-6108
www.168CAD.net
110/05/2022
THE OWNER HAS CHECKED
THE PLAN AND CONFIRMED
THAT THE PLAN IS CORRECT
OWNER
SIGNATURE____________________
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0"
(E) FLOOR PLAN
(E) FLOOR
PLANS,
PROPOSED
FLOOR PLAN
A-3
N
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0"
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
N
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0"
(E) GARAGE FLOOR PLAN
N
1 1
9.b
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 8'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
13'-8"
(E) BUILDING HEIGHT
T.O.R 4'-2"
1'-0"
5 12
8'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
T.O.R
4'-2"
13'-8"
1'-6"GRADEGRADE1'-6"
8'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
13'-8"
T.O.R 4'-2"
1'-0"
8'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
T.O.R
4'-2"
13'-8"1'-0"
1'-6"GRADEGRADE1'-6"
1 12
(E) BUILDING HEIGHT
(E) BUILDING HEIGHT
(E) BUILDING HEIGHT
8'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
13'-8"
T.O.R 4'-2"
1'-0"
5 12
8'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
T.O.R
4'-2"
13'-8"
1'-6"GRADEGRADE1'-6"
1'-0"1'-0"
8'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
13'-8"
T.O.R 4'-2"
GRADE1'-6"
8'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
T.O.R
4'-2"
13'-8"
1'-6"GRADE
1 12
(E) BUILDING HEIGHT
(E) BUILDING HEIGHT
(E) BUILDING HEIGHT
(E) BUILDING HEIGHT
10'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
15'-3 1/2"
T.O.R 4'-7 1/2"
10'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
T.O.R
4'-7 1/2"
15'-3 1/2"
8"GRADE
8"
1 3
10'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
15'-3 1/2"
(N) BUILDING HEIGHT
T.O.R 4'-7 1/2"
1'-0"
5 12
10'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
T.O.R
4'-7 1/2"
15'-3 1/2"
8"
8"
(N)
5'-8"
(N)
3'-8"
(N)
2 54
3'-8"
(N)
32 5'-8"
(N)
(N) BUILDING HEIGHT
(N) BUILDING HEIGHT
(N) BUILDING HEIGHT(N)
3'-8"
3'-8"
(N)
(N) (N)(N)
1'-0"
3'-8"
(N)
3'-8"
(N)
(N)
A.D.U.J.A.D.U.MAIN HOUSE J.A.D.U.
3'-8"
(N)
8'-0"
3'-0"
8'-0"
1 ELEVATION KEY NOTES
(N) EXTERIOR WALL STUCCO, COLOR &
STYLE MATCH EXISTING, BRAND OMAGE,
ICC# ESR-2671
2 (N) VINYL WINDOWS, COLOR & STYLE
MATCH EXISTING
#
3 (N) DOORS, COLOR & STYLE
MATCH EXISTING
(N) EXTERIOR WALL LIGHT,COLOR &
STYLE MATCH EXISTING
4 10'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
15'-3 1/2"
(N) BUILDING HEIGHT
T.O.R 4'-7 1/2"
1'-0"
5 12
10'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
T.O.R
4'-7 1/2"
15'-3 1/2"
8"
8"
10'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
15'-3 1/2"
T.O.R 4'-7 1/2"
1'-0"
10'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
T.O.R
4'-7 1/2"
15'-3 1/2"
8"GRADE
8"
(N)
(N)
5'-8"
(N)
12 23 54
5 3'-8"
(N) COMPOSITION (CLASS-A) ROOF
SHINGLES WITH 2 LAYERS, COLOR &
STYLE MATCH EXISTING, ICC# ESR 1389 /
COMPOSITION ASPHALT SHINGLE
PRODUCTS
ˈINSTALLATION SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER’S
SPECIFICATIONS.
(N) BUILDING HEIGHT
(N) BUILDING HEIGHT
(N) BUILDING HEIGHT
(N)
3'-8"
3'-8"
(N)
(N) (N)
34 5'-8"
(N)
5'-8"
(N)
A.D.U.
(N)
J.A.D.U. MAIN HOUSEJ.A.D.U.
8'-0"
3'-0"
8'-0"
T.O.P
GARAGE
12'-1 1/2"
(E) BUILDING HEIGHT
T.O.R 3'-9 1/2" 4"
8'-0"
T.O.P
GARAGE
12'-1 1/2"
(E) BUILDING HEIGHT
T.O.R 3'-9 1/2" 4"
8'-0"
T.O.P
GARAGE
12'-1 1/2"
(E) BUILDING HEIGHT
T.O.R 3'-9 1/2" 4"
8'-0"
T.O.P
GARAGE
12'-1 1/2"
(E) BUILDING HEIGHT
T.O.R 3'-9 1/2" 4"
SHEET TITLE
Sheet
PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS
REVISIONS
of Sheet
Drawn ALAN
Date 11/19/22
DATE NO.
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
IDEAS, DESIGNS AND ARRANGEMENTS
ARE, AND SHALL REMAIN, THE PROPERTY
OF 168CAD DESIGN NO PART SHALL BE
COPIED, REPRODUCED OR OTHERWISE
USED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE
OR IN PART, IN CONNECTION WITH ANY
OTHER WORK OR PROJECT WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF 168CAD VISUAL
CONTACT WITH THESE DRAWINGS AND/OR
SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONSTITUTE A
PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF
THESE RESTRICTIONS.
(N) 1 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
&A.D.U.&J.A.D.U.
68 PAGE ST
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
135 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE
SUITE 200,BREA,CA,92821
[email protected]
Tel: (626) 899-6108
www.168CAD.net
110/05/2022
THE OWNER HAS CHECKED
THE PLAN AND CONFIRMED
THAT THE PLAN IS CORRECT
OWNER
SIGNATURE____________________
(E) ELEVATIONS
PROPOSED
ELEVATIONS
A-4
(E) SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'- 0"
(E) WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'- 0"
(E) NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'- 0"
(E) EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'- 0"
PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'- 0"
PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'- 0"
PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'- 0"
PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'- 0"
(E) GARAGE EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'- 0"
(E) GARAGE SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'- 0"
(E) GARAGE NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'- 0"
(E) GARAGE WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'- 0"
1 9.b
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 5:12
(N)
5:12
(N)
83'
22'-3"
1'
1'
1'
5:12
(E)
5:12
(E)
1:12(E)
TO BE REMOVED
SHEET TITLE
Sheet
PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS
REVISIONS
of Sheet
Drawn ALAN
Date 11/19/22
DATE NO.
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
IDEAS, DESIGNS AND ARRANGEMENTS
ARE, AND SHALL REMAIN, THE PROPERTY
OF 168CAD DESIGN NO PART SHALL BE
COPIED, REPRODUCED OR OTHERWISE
USED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE
OR IN PART, IN CONNECTION WITH ANY
OTHER WORK OR PROJECT WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF 168CAD VISUAL
CONTACT WITH THESE DRAWINGS AND/OR
SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONSTITUTE A
PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF
THESE RESTRICTIONS.
(N) 1 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
&A.D.U.&J.A.D.U.
68 PAGE ST
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
135 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE
SUITE 200,BREA,CA,92821
[email protected]
Tel: (626) 899-6108
www.168CAD.net
110/05/2022
THE OWNER HAS CHECKED
THE PLAN AND CONFIRMED
THAT THE PLAN IS CORRECT
OWNER
SIGNATURE____________________
(E) ROOF PLAN
PROPOSED
ROOF PLAN
A-5
(E) ROOF PLAN
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0"
N
PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0"
N
9.b
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 10'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
15'-3 1/2"
T.O.R 4'-7 1/2"
10'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
T.O.R
4'-7 1/2"
15'-3 1/2"
8"GRADEGRADE8"
(N) BUILDING HEIGHT
4 3
1 2
6 8
7 (N) BUILDING HEIGHT
10'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
14'-10"
T.O.R 4'-2" 5
12 10'-0"
T.O.P
F.F.
T.O.R
4'-2"
14'-10"
8"GRADE
8"
9 5
10 R-30 INSULATION FOR CEILING AREA (TYP.)1
2 4
5 6
7 8
9 3
R-11 INSULATION FOR EXTERIOR WALL AREA (TYP.)
FOUNDATION FOOTING SEE STRUCT.PLAN FOR DETAIL.
2X ROOF RAFTER (SEE STRUCT. FOR SIZE-TYP.)
1/ 2" PLYWOOD (OSB) W/ RADIANT BARRIER UNBLOCKED P.I.
INDEX 24/ 0
HEADER / BEAM PER PLAN (SEE STRUCT.PLAN FOR DETAIL.TYP.) WALL TRUSS PER PLAN (SEE STRUCT.PLAN FOR DETAIL.TYP.)
CONC.FOUNDATION SLAB SEE STRUCT.PLAN FOR DETAIL.
SECTION MATERIAL LEGEND
RADIANT BARRIOR
2X CEILING JOIST (SEE STRUCT. FOR SIZE-TYP.)
10 4
3 1
2 6
8 7
SHEET TITLE
Sheet
PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS
REVISIONS
of Sheet
Drawn ALAN
Date 11/19/22
DATE NO.
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
IDEAS, DESIGNS AND ARRANGEMENTS
ARE, AND SHALL REMAIN, THE PROPERTY
OF 168CAD DESIGN NO PART SHALL BE
COPIED, REPRODUCED OR OTHERWISE
USED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE
OR IN PART, IN CONNECTION WITH ANY
OTHER WORK OR PROJECT WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF 168CAD VISUAL
CONTACT WITH THESE DRAWINGS AND/OR
SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONSTITUTE A
PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF
THESE RESTRICTIONS.
(N) 1 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
&A.D.U.&J.A.D.U.
68 PAGE ST
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
135 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE
SUITE 200,BREA,CA,92821
[email protected]
Tel: (626) 899-6108
www.168CAD.net
110/05/2022
THE OWNER HAS CHECKED
THE PLAN AND CONFIRMED
THAT THE PLAN IS CORRECT
OWNER
SIGNATURE____________________
SECTIONS
A-6
SECTION A
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'- 0"
SECTION B
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'- 0"
9.b
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) (E) NON-CONFORMING
2 CAR GARAGE
329 S.F.
(N) 1 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
1056 S.F.
25'
CENTER OF STREET
SYNTHETIC
TURF
(N)
CONCRETE
PAVE.
(E) SOD
20'-1"
4'
4'-3"
3'-11"
1'-9"
1'-6"
(E) WOOD FENCE
H: 6'-0"
(E) WOOD FENCE
H: 6'-0"
(E) IRON WROUGHT RAIL
H: 3'-0"
16'-4"
14'-7"
3'
5'
(E) GAS
METER
CURB
CURB
52'
10'-2"
20'-3"
26'
PROPOSED A.D.U. WITH SEPARATE PERMIT
529 S.F.
192.08192.00
191.94
D.S.D.S.
D.S. D.S. D.S.
(N)AREA
DRAIN
192.25
192.06
D.S. 192.28 192.10 192.03
192.24
SLOPE SLOPE
SLOPESLOPESLOPE
3%
SLOPE
MINMM.
191.90
SLOPE
191.78
191.80
10'
191.75
191.85
191.78
SLOPE191.98
192.22
192.26 191.94SLOPE
2% SLOPE
5% SLOPE
191.90
191.97
SLOPE
191.75
(N)AREA
DRAIN
(N) DRY
WELL
(N) DRY
WELL
(N) AREA
DRAIN
192.17
2%
SLOPE
191.85
4'' PIPE
PERFORATED
SLOPE
192.20 192.15 191.88
5%
SLOPE 191.90
(N) CONCRETE
PAVE.
192.05192.15
(N) 4'' SUBSURFACE
DRAINAGE PIPE
(N) 4'' SUBSURFACE
DRAINAGE PIPE
192.10192.23
192.10
192.04
192.08
STREET TREES & GREEN BUFFER
(E) WATER
METER
192.23
191.95
7% SLOPE
191.81
192.15 192.20
191.98
2% SLOPE
4'
(N) ELECTRICAL
METER
5% SLOPE
PROPOSED TREES
LOW POINT
A/C
(E) NON-CONFORMING
2 CAR GARAGE
329 S.F.
(N) 1 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
1056 S.F.
(N)
CONCRETE
PAVE.
(E) SOD
20'-1"
4'
4'-3"
3'-11"
1'-9"
1'-6"
(E) WOOD FENCE
H: 6'-0"
(E) WOOD FENCE
H: 6'-0"
(E) IRON WROUGHT RAIL
H: 3'-0"
16'-4"
3'
CURB
52'
10'-2"
20'-3"
26'
PROPOSED A.D.U. WITH SEPARATE PERMIT
529 S.F.
(N)AREA
DRAIN
(N)AREA
DRAIN
(N) AREA
DRAIN
(N) CONCRETE PAVE.
STREET TREES & GREEN BUFFER
SYNTHETIC
TURF AREA
LATIN NAME: ACACIA COGNATA
COMMON NAME: BOWER WATTLE
25 GALLON
LATIN NAME: PARKINSONIA
'DESERT MUSEUM'
COMMON NAME: DESERT
MUSEUM PALO VERDE
15 GALLON
LATIN NAME: CEANOTHUS
THYRSIFLORUS
VAR.GRISEUS
COMMON NAME:
'CALIFORNIA LILAC'
5 GALLON
(VINES) LATIN NAME:
HARDENBERGIA VIOLACEA
'‘MEEMA’' 1 GALLON
(VINES) LATIN NAME:
HARDENBERGIA VIOLACEA
'‘MEEMA’' 1 GALLON
(N) ENTRY PORCH.
SYNTHETIC TURF AREA
ON SAME DWG. FOR DESCRIPTION
KEY NOTE, REFER TO LISTING
DRAWING WHERE ELEVATION IS DRAWN
INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR ELEVATION
REVISION CALLOUT
AC.T. -ACOUSTICTILE
AFF -ABOVE FINISH FLOOR
BLDG -BUILDING
BLK -BLOCK
BMT -BOTTOM
C.B. -CATCHBASIN
CEM -CEMENT
CER.T. -CERAMIC TILE
C.J. -CONTROL JOINT
CLR. -CLEAR
CLG -CEILING
CONC. -CONCRETE
CONSTR. -CONSTRUCTION
CONT. -CONTINUOUS
CONTR. -CONTRACTOR
CTR. -CENTER
DET. -DETAIL
DIA. -DIAMETER
DIM -DIMENSION
D.O. -DOOR OPENING
DWG -DRAWING
ELEV. -ELEVATION
EXT -EXTERIOR
F.F. -FINISH FLOOR
F.G. -FINISH GRADE
FIN -FINISH
FLR -FLOOR
FDN -FOUNDATION
FTG -FOOTING
FURR -FURRING
GEN -GENERAL
HYD -HYDRANT
INSUL -INSULATION
LAV -LAVATORY
LT -LIGHT
MAR -MARBLE
MAS -MASONRY
MAX -MAXIMUM
MECH. -MECHANICAL
MIN. -MINIMUM
MISC. -MISCELLANEOUS
NO -NUMBER
O/C -ON CENTER
O.D. -OUTSIDE DIAMETER
O/O -OUT TO OUT
OPNG -OPENING
PLYWD -PLYWOOD
PTD -PAINTED
R.D. -ROOF DRAIN
REINF. -REINFORCEMENT
REQD. -REQUIRED
STD -STANDARD
T.O.P. -TOP OF PLATE
TYP -TYPICAL
VCT -VINYL COMPOSITION TILE
WD -WOOD
WT -WEIGHT
(N) -NEW
(E) -EXISTING
A.P.N. 279-46-021 YEAR BUILT 1915 ZONING R-1- 6 OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-3/U
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-B
STORIES : 1
LOT SIZE 3415 S.F.
EXISTING:
(E) FLOOR AREA 622 S.F. (E) 1 CAR GARAGE 329 S.F.
(E) STORAGE TO BE REMOVED 105 S.F.
(E) PATIO TO BE REMOVED 204 S.F.
PROPOSED:
(N) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 1056 S.F.
(E) 1 CAR GARAGE 329 S.F.
(N) ATTACHED A.D.U. 529S.F.
LOT COVERAGE=(1056+329)/3415=1385/3415=40.56%
FAR=1056/3415=30.95%
ON SAME DWG. FOR DESCRIPTION
KEY NOTE, REFER TO LISTING
WALL SECTION NUMBER
DRAWING WHERE SECTION IS DRAWN
REVISION CALLOUT
WINDOW SYMBOL
DOOR NUMBER
PHOTOGRAPH DIAGRAMS
ALAN GAO
135 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE SUITE 200 , BREA ,CA 92821
(626)-899-6108
CONSULTANT INFOR.PROJECT DATA
SCOPE OF WORK
SYMBOL LEGEND ABBREVATIONS
DETAIL NUMBER
DRAWING WHERE DETAIL IS DRAWN
OWNER
NAME YANJUN WANG
PHONE 408-883-5533
ADDRESS 68 PAGE ST, CAMPBELL, CA 95008
VICINITY MAP
DESIGNER
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
SHEET INDEX
A-1. COVER SHEET, (E) SITE PLAN, PROPOSED SITE PLAN A-2. (E) FLOOR PLAN, PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
A-3. (E) ELEVATIONS, ROOF PLAN, PROPOSED ELEVATIONS, ROOF PLAN G-1 GRADING, DRAINAGE, LANDSCAPE & COMBINED UTILITY PLANS SITE
SPECIFICATION
LEGEND
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS
PRIOR TO ANY WORK AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK AND MATERIALS INCLUDING THAT FURNISHED BY SUBCONTRACTORS.
2. DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER DRAWINGS; DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS TO DETERMINE ANY LOCATION. THE OWNER OR DESIGNER SHALL
BE NOTIFIED IF ANY DISCREPANCY OCCURS PRIOR TO CONTINUING WITH WORK.
3. ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE FROM CENTER LINE OF STUD OR FACE OF FINISH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
4. ANY CHANGES PRIOR TO APPROVED SET OF PLANS, 168CAD BUILDING DESIGN MUST BE NOTIFIED. CONTRACTOR OR PERSON CONDUCTING WORK SHOULD NOTIFY 168CAD BUILDING DESIGN IF ANY DISCREPANCY OCCURS DURING CONSTRUCTION. 168CAD BUILDING DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR OR HOME BUILDER PERFORMANCE TO PERFORM WORK.
5. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES AND LOCAL RESTRICTIONS.
6. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ALL
EXISTING MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SERVICES AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT, AND TO PROTECT THEM FROM DAMAGE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR ALL EXPENSE OR REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT
OF UTILITIES OR OTHER PROPERTY DAMAGED BY OPERATIONS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OR
REMEDY OF ANY FAULTY, IMPROPER OR INTERIOR MATERIALS OR WORKMANSHIP WHICH SHALL APPEAR WITHIN (1) YEAR OR AS OTHERWISE
SPECIFIED FOR A SPECIFIC COMPONENT AFTER THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT.
8. SILICONE CAULK SHALL BE USED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS INCLUDING BUT LIMITED TO:
1. METAL DOOR AND WALL CONNECTION
2. CONDUIT AND PIPE PENETRATIONS AT WALLS AND CEILING.
3. JUNCTION OF MILLWORK (CABINETS, SHELVES, BOOTHS).
4. STAINLESS STEEL TO WALLS
DO NOT CAULK ANY OTHER AREAS, ESPECIALLY AT GREYWOOD
9. CONTRACTOR IS TO CLEAN WORK AREAS ON A DAILY BASIS SO AS NOT TO ACCUMULATE DEBRIS.
10. UPON PROJECT COMPLETION CONTRACTOR IS TO CLEAN WORK AREAS AND
JOB SITE THOROUGHLY SO AS TO REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DUST, RESIDUE, AND DEBRIS.
11. DO NOT OBSTRUCT STREETS, SIDEWALKS, ALLEYS OR OTHER RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING PROPER PERMITS.
12. ALL WORK SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH QUALITY WORKMANSHIP OF THE HIGHEST INDUSTRY STANDARDS. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN
STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. MATERIALS AND METHODS SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE NATIONAL TRADE BOOK; I.E. TILE COUNCIL OF AMERICA
HANDBOOK FOR CERAMIC TILE INSTALLATION, ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK INSTITUTE, "QUALITY STANDARDS" ETC.
13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR JOB SAFETY, AND SHALL
TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO ENSURE SAFETY OF WORKS AND OCCUPANTS AT ALL TIMES.
14. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING THE HOURS OF 7:00 AM TO 6:00 PM, MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY. NO WORK IS TO OCCUR ON SUNDAYS OR HOLIDAYS.
15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL MINOR ITEMS WHICH
ARE OBVIOUSLY AND REASONABLE NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ANY
INSTALLATION.
16. MINIMUM FLAME SPREAD CLASSIFICATION OF INTERIOR FINISH SHALL
CONFORM TO THE BUILDING CODE AND LOCAL GOVERNING BUILDING CODES/ORDINANCES.
17. PROJECT SHALL CONFORM TO THE:
2019 CBC.
2019 CMC
2019 CPC
2019 CEC
2019 T-24
2020 LA COUNTY CRC
AND ALL CITY AND COUNTY LAWS AND ORDINANCES.
18. ADDITIONAL MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING PERMITS SHALL BE OBTAINED AS REQUIRED.
GENERAL NOTES
W (E) WATER METER
G GAS METER
P POWER POLE
S SEWER
D DOWN SPOUT
F FIRE HYDRANT
A/C AIR CONDITION
E (E) ELECTRICAL PANEL
GRADING,
DRAINAGE,
LANDSCAPE &
COMBINED
UTILITY PLANS
G-1
1. (N) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 1056 S.F.
2. REPLACE ALL RUG TO WOOD FLOORING (SPV)
3. REPLACE ALL OUT SIDE WALL TO STUCCO
4. UPGRADE 50 AMP PANEL TO 200 AMP
5. REMOVE EXISTING PATIO AND STORAGE
SHEET TITLE
Sheet
PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS
REVISIONS
of Sheet
Drawn ALAN
Date 10/15/22
DATE NO.
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
IDEAS, DESIGNS AND ARRANGEMENTS
ARE, AND SHALL REMAIN, THE PROPERTY
OF 168CAD DESIGN NO PART SHALL BE
COPIED, REPRODUCED OR OTHERWISE
USED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE
OR IN PART, IN CONNECTION WITH ANY
OTHER WORK OR PROJECT WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF 168CAD VISUAL
CONTACT WITH THESE DRAWINGS AND/OR
SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONSTITUTE A
PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF
THESE RESTRICTIONS.
(N) 1 STORY
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
68 PAGE ST
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
135 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE
SUITE 200,BREA,CA,92821
[email protected]
Tel: (626) 899-6108
www.168CAD.net
110/05/2022
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0"
SURVEYED LOT DIMENSIONS
COMBINED UTILITY, GRADING,
AND DRAINAGE PLAN
N
NB ENGINEERING INC
[email protected]
(626) 269-9321
STRUCTURAL
NAME
EMAIL
PHONE
ENERGY
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
BLUE SEA DESIGN LLC.
17770 CASTLETON ST. # 589 CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748
(626) 810-3333
EG
PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AREAS
DOCUMENTATION
PERVIOUS AREAS 368.5 S.F.
PROPOSED SYNTHETIC TURF 246 S.F.
EXISTING SOD 122.5 S.F.
STATED MAXIMUM DEPTH AND
VOLUMES OF CUT AND FILL
COMBINED PERVIOUS/ IMPERVIOUS AREAS 1500 S.F.
IMPERVIOUS AREAS 1131.5 S.F.
PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVING AREA: 1075 S.F.
EXISTING CONCRETE 56.5 S.F.
MAXIMUM DEPTHS
CUT 0.15 FEET FILL 0.36 FEET
MAXIMUM VOLUMES
CUT 158.52 CUBIC FEET FILL 359.325 CUBIC FEET ESTIMATED TOTAL FILL: 200.805 CUBIC FEET SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0"
LANDSCAPE PLAN
N
G
W
W
E
A/C
A/C
9.b
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Project Plans (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval)
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Planning Commission Minutes
7:30 P.M. TUESDAY
February 14, 2022
PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The Planning Commission meeting on Tuesday February 14, 2022, was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA, by Chair Ching and the following proceedings were had, to wit:
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present: Chair: Adam Buchbinder
Vice Chair: Alan Zisser
Commissioner: Matt Kamkar
Commissioner: Michael Krey
Commissioner: Maggie Ostrowski
Commissioner: Davis Fields
Commissioners Absent: Commissioner: Stuart Ching
Staff Present:
Director: Rob Eastwood
City Attorney: Bill Seligmann
Senior Planner: Daniel Fama
Senior Planner: Stephen Rose
Associate Planner: Tracy Tam
Admin Analyst: Ken Ramirez
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approved January 24, 2022 meeting minutes.
COMMUNICATIONS
None.
9.c
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: PC Meeting Minutes (2023-02-14) (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – February 14, 2023 Page 2
AGENDA MODIFICATIONS OR POSTPONEMENTS
Item 1. Revised plan and additional email
Item 3 . Letters received regarding MFDDS
ORAL REQUESTS
Disclosures: Krey, Zisser, and Buchbinder visited the site.
Chair Buchbinder opened public comments
Hearing none, Chair Buchbinder closed public comments.
Chair Buchbinder read Agenda Item No. 1 into the record as follows:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. PLN-2022-101 Public Hearing to consider the request of Yanjun Wang for property located at 68 Page Street to allow construction of an approximately 1,053 square -foot one -story single -family dwelling, inclusive of a 313 square -foot junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU), with a 529 square -foot attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU), with substandard front - and street-side setbacks ( 14 ½-ft and 3 -ft respectively), including retention of an existing detached non-conforming garage. File No.: PLN-2022-101. Staff is recommendi ng that this item be deemed Categorically Exempt from CEQA. Planning
Commission action is final unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk within 10 calendar days. Project Planner: Daniel Fama, Senior Planner.
Senior planner presented staff report Hearing to consider the request of Yanjun Wang for property located at 68 Page Street to allow construction of an approximately 1,053 square-foot one-story single-family dwelling, inclusive of a 313 square-foot junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU), with a 529 square-foot attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU), with substandard front- and street-side setbacks (14 ½-ft and 3-ft respectively), including retention of an existing detached non-conforming garage.
Commissioner Fields asked about property size minimums and what constitutes a single- family home and standard ADU.
Senior Planner Fama clarified that Campbell does not have a specific standard that speaks to both.
Commissioners stated that letters received show concern about the back setback chosen in the project plan details, also questioned the number of doors used within the project, the lack of green space, whether the owner was required to reside in the property , and what implications would result due to not approving the variance.
9.c
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: PC Meeting Minutes (2023-02-14) (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – February 14, 2023 Page 3 Senior Planner Fama stated if the variance is not approved the Planning Commission need to provide reasoning for establishing the findings.
Planning Commissioners asked how boarding house concerns manifested and whether the city can be fined or held liable against HAA if denied. City Attorney confirmed that the City could be.
Applicant spoke and stated that they would be living on the property with a parent residing in the ADU. Applicant plans on installing solar as well.
Public Comment regarding Public Hearing item opened.
Ed Barrera – was not in support of plan. Stated that if this plan was approved then you would for other surrounding homes to make similar investments. JADUs and ADUs here are defined as interim housing.
Patrick Gasaway – stated having a 6200 sq. ft. lot and that they will apply for this variance. Asked questions about the impact to the infrastructure. Stated that this would result in a slippery slope of other applications or issues.
Lauryn Ash – emphasized the importance of protecting the infrastructure of the city.
Asked if everyone who did this would be allowed. Also asked how Planner originally declined certain project details but allowed the project to continue. Stated that this project was not in the best interest of Campbell and was concerned that there would be no place for kids to play in the neighborhood.
Pat Clark – stated that making the exception to the variance is wrong. Theres a risk for everyone driving through the neighborhood. Making the house three times as large as what it used to be is not right because it is a corner house and vehicles cannot see incoming cars in that intersection and as a result to this project would see even less due to the restricted view.
Brittany Souza – Stated being shocked that with their combine income that they will be living in this place. Stated that it was an obvious attempt to take advantage of the situation. Stated that this was not a normal and did not fit in the neighborhood.
Emphasized that the project will reduce the cost of homes in the area.
Russ Biswell – stated not being opposed to ADUs but is against single room occupancy in tiny lots. Saw that the request was an approval is for variance in new construction when new construction is not grandfathered but it is obvious that it is an SRO construction.
Asked the Planning Commission represent the residents by denying the variance.
Yolanda Ferrera – stated that approving this would create other homes buying and renting out the property for 60 days.
Raja Pallela – did not believe the Project application was in fact a real variance. Did not see difference in lot elevation. Appalled that they were allowing people to make comments of the applicant. Is not sure why they Planning Commission is discussing
9.c
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: PC Meeting Minutes (2023-02-14) (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – February 14, 2023 Page 4 ADUs. Does not believe that is a good use of time to discuss the application for a variance. Stated that the Planning Commission has a duty to inform themselves.
Christopher Hersh – stated that he would not have a problem if the proposal had the same land use. Issue is with the extension. Also concerned with fire and safety.
Emphasized that there should be consideration for alternative ways for looking at this square footage. Requested that it not be approved.
Mark V – concerned with doors disappearing and coming back and the how close the doors will be to the street. Believes that the house looks like a boarding house rather than a hotel.
Public comment closed.
Commissioner Krey – does not believe that approval is needed for this, the state has opened the doors for projects like this. Stated that every community in the country is working on grappling this. Hopes that approval of this does not degrade the quality of life.
Open to hearing fellow commissioners. Does not see how they could disapprove the variance even if they wanted to.
Commissioner Kamkar – sees both sides and is conflicted. Hands are partially tied.
Believes that property could have had a second floor. Could have had more green space on the property and believes the project has too many doors opening on the street side.
Believes that preventing a precedence to for this to happen in other parts of the city is provides enough rationale to deny the variance. Still unsure and wants to hear from colleagues.
Commissioner Ostrowski – agrees with previous comments from other commissioners that this is not an easy decision. Much of the ability and direction to build ADUs and JADUs comes from the State. Seems that variance would be allowed based on strict interpretation of the definition from the state. There were alternatives that could have been explored by the applicant like adding a second story, adding balconies, repositioning the location of the ADU. Seems somewhat reasonable, as variance is part of the state law based on uniqueness of the property. Front door amounts and locations are outside the purview of what is discussed.
Commissioner Fields – understands role and state law. Have not heard reason enough to deny and finding substantial findings to deny the variance.
Vice Chair Zisser – would have preferred to have seen a house with one ADU in the space. Recognizes that applicant has a legal right to put in a JADU. Emphasized that public has a right to speak and give their opinion. Reiterated that there are constraints on decisions based on state law and has become painfully aware of the state mandates.
There is no code against the number of doors. Stated that he was not completely comfortable with the setbacks. There is speculation about what it will be used for but heard from applicant and will trust that the applicant is being truthful. Received confirmation from the City Attorney that the owner would need to occupy the property indefinitely. Concern was expressed about rejecting things that the state would not
9.c
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: PC Meeting Minutes (2023-02-14) (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – February 14, 2023 Page 5 approve and will hold City liable. Maybe they should cut down the size of the bedroom to give more space on maple. Understand where public comments are coming from.
Commissioner Kamkar asked whether the owner needed to occupy residence and its primary residence.
City Attorney clarified that the owner needs to live there but it does not need to be its primary residence
Chair Buchbinder – stated that the State of California wants you to put an ADU in your yard. Important to have an interim option when people can’t afford the purchase of a home. Mentioned that there was a sense of mistrust, that the city is not good for their word and owner is not good for their word . Reiterated that the City has enforcement procedures if homes and spaces are not used for what they are intended for. City also has neighborhood traffic calming programs. Stated that, generally speaking, things are changing and have been changing. Acknowledging that housing affordability and property values conflict with each other.
Vice Chair Zisser commented that 50% of Campbell residents are renters. Expressed an appreciation for both sides and that several points of this that can be looked at in a positive way.
Motion: Upon motion by Commissioner Krey, seconded by Commissioner Ostrowski, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 46 63 approving a Variance to allow construction of an approximately 1,053 square -foot one -story single -family dwelling, inclusive of a 313 square-foot junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU), with a 529 square- foot attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU), with substandard from - and street -side setbacks, including retention of an existing detached non-conforming garage for property located at 68 Page Stree t. (PLN - 2022-101), as per the corrected plans included in the desk item, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Fields, Ostrowski, Krey, Buchbinder
NOES: Kamkar
ABSENT: Ching
ABSTAIN: Zisser
9.c
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: PC Meeting Minutes (2023-02-14) (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – February 14, 2023 Page 16
SUBMITTED BY: ______________________________________
Ken Ramirez, Administrative Analyst
APPROVED BY: ______________________________________
Adam Buchbinder, Chair
ATTEST: ______________________________________
Rob Eastwood, Secretary
9.c
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: PC Meeting Minutes (2023-02-14) (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) To whom it may concern:
I am writing to you on the behalf of the neighborhood’s grave concerns surrounding the proposedsetbacks for 68 Page street which I share a fence with. We’d like to appeal/dispute the planning’sCommission’s decision to allow a 3 foot setback along Maple Ave and Page Street for a new single-familydwelling consisting of an ADU, a JDU, and a main residence with a total of nine exterior doors. Wedispute this setback decision on the grounds that it is unprecedented and in violation of the current Stateof California guidelines for building a new structure.
The current owner of 68 Page Street knowingly tore down the existing structure without permits orpermission to build the current planned structure and yet the City of Campbell seemingly wishes to rewardthis behavior with an arbitrary variance that, with two exterior exits on the north side of the property, wouldbe to the detriment of pedestrians along Maple Ave. The current rules for setbacks require 12 feet fromthe property line along a street and yet the city is cutting this by three quarters on the grounds that thereis no such thing as an 11-foot house. This is, in fact, incorrect. Many Tiny Homes are 11 feet wide. In fact,if the city had considered a 9-foot variance, the house could then be 14 feet wide, which is the width ofthe average mobile home. Considering Campbell has at least two mobile home parks in which residentsreside happily, such a width is indeed livable and acceptable and has been for years. A three-footvariance with 2 of the 9 doors exiting onto Maple Ave is not enough room for an exit and, as previouslymentioned, could pose detriment to the average pedestrian. Consider that there are two legally blindchildren living on Maple Ave who will have to pass this house daily.
The City of Campbell’s dismissal of the legal setback rules instituted by the State of California at theexpense of the safety and well-being of the current residents of the surrounding neighborhood isdisappointing. The setback rules exist for a reason. If a compromise is necessary, we would ask that theplanning commission consider a lesser setback on the north property line. There are no other propertiesin the area with three-foot setbacks so why would the planning commission even entertain one at thispoint? We would ask that the City planning commission reconsider its decision and come up with a plan thatwould better suit current residents and the owner of 68 Page Street. We would like to point out that theowner of 68 Page Street bought the property knowing the dimensions of both the property and theexisting structure. Perhaps more research into the current laws and regulations regarding setbacksshould have been considered when purchasing said property.With an ADU and a main residence set to be occupied by the owner and his parents and the JDU to bepossibly rented out at a going market price that far exceeds any subsidized housing costs, a property anddwelling of this size does very little to help the housing crisis currently facing California, as suggested bythe commission.
Please consider our request that we are met at a minimum half way and force the owner to seek a 6 footvariance on the north side (Maple Avenue). A 3 foot setback is not acceptable.
Yours truly,
Brittany & Shaun Sozua, & the surrounding neighborhood
9.d
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Appeal Letter (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) City of Campbell
Community Development Department
70 N. First St.
Campbell, CA 95008
Date: August 15, 2022
Re: Letter of Intent for Zoning Variance for 68 Page St. Campbell. CA 95008 Zoning: R-1-6, APN: 27946021
Dear Planning & Zoning Members,
We are requesting a variance for the captioned address to seek relief of the required minimum public frontage, maximum lot coverage, front setback, street side setback, and vehicular access.
Please refer to the site plan for the details. The proposed relief herein would allow the property owners to rebuild the house. We believe our request satisfies all five of the variance findings reasoned below:
Variance finding ONE: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the subject property (i.e. size, shape, topography) which do not apply generally to other properties classified in the same zoning district.
Apparently, it is applicable to this property. The property is a corner lot and it is a very narrow property. It is the smallest-size property (3415 sft) among all properties with the same zone type in that area. All other properties' size are above 4900 sft. In addition, the size of the two corner lots near it is 6251 sft (571 Maple Ave, Campbell CA) and 5256 sft (564 Hawthorne Ave, Campbell CA) respectively.
Variance finding TWO: The- strict or literal interpretations and enforcement of the specified regulation(s) would result in a practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Zoning Code.
Again, it is applicable to this property. The required street side setback is 12 feet. The required rear setback is 5 feet. However, the width of the property is only 28.25 feet. To enforce the street side and rear setback requirements literally, the house can only be 11.25 feet in width. It can be imaged how practically difficult to have a single family house with the width of 11.25 feet only!
Furthermore, the owners plan to build an attached ADU in the future after the completion of the main house. Because of the size and narrow characters of the property, it is completely impossible to build an attached ADU complying with current zoning regulations.
Variance finding THREE: The strict or literal interpretations and enforcement of the specified regulation(s) would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties classified in the same zoning district.
9.e
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Applicant Variance Statement (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) It is completely true in our situations. The zone type of the property is R-1-6. Under R-1-6, owners have privileges to have a single family house and one attached or detached ADU. As demonstrated above, it is extremely difficult for us to have a single family house if setback requirements are literally enforced. And it is completely impossible to have an attached ADU if specified zoning regulations are literally enforced.
Variance finding FOURTH: The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zoning district.
As indicated below, the specified relief that we request herein is a slight variance to the zoning regulations. It will not grant any special privilege to us.
Specified Zoning Regulation Variance
Minimum public frontage 25 feet 14.7 feet (same as existing house) Maximum lot coverage 40% 40.6%
Front setback 20 feet 14.7 feet (same as existing house) Street side setback 12 feet 3 feet (existing house is 1 feet only) Vehicular access • 25 feet 14.7 feet (same as existing house) Variance 'finding FIFTH: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
It is completely true in our situations. Actually, the new house will advantageous to the public health, safety, and welfare of the surrounding properties and community. As you can see, the current old house is shabby and its street side setback is only 1 feet. We request to have the street side setback as 3 feet which will bring pedestrians more comfort and safety. It will be easy to conduct public work as well. Furthermore, the new house will improve the view of the community and thus enhance the value of the properties in the vicinity.
We respectfully request your granting of variance in order that we can have a new house as early as possible. Thank you for your time on this matter.
Sincerely,
Ya~
9.e
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Applicant Variance Statement (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval)
9.f
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Tract Maps (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval)
9.f
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Tract Maps (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval)
9.g
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Sanborn Map (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) From: Rich Chuang
To: Daniel Fama
Cc: Rob Eastwood; Andrea Sanders
Subject: Re: Appeal to Planning Commission"s Decision Re: 68 Page St Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 1:00:00 PM
Attachments: image004.png
image006.png
image010.png
image011.png
image005.png
image008.png
image009.png
Hi Daniel,
Thank you very much for the assurance. Hopefully this restriction on the deed will be enforced by the city should this or any future owner violate the restriction on short- term rentals.
Thanks,
Rich
On Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 12:44:07 PM PST, Daniel Fama <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Rich – Thank you for the follow-up. Yes, we will record the appropriate deed restriction.
Daniel
Daniel Fama
Senior Planner
City of Campbell | Community Development Department
(408) 866-2193 (call or text)
Book a Virtual/In-Person Appointment with a Planner here.
Apply for Planning and Building Permits here.
From: Rich Chuang <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 12:21 PM
To: Daniel Fama <[email protected]>
Cc: Rob Eastwood <[email protected]>; Andrea Sanders <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Appeal to Planning Commission's Decision Re: 68 Page St
9.h
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) Hi Daniel,
We did not realize that there's a fee associated with making a third party appeal of a Planning Commission decision in which we were not the applicant. That being the case, we've decided to drop our appeal as we feel the chances of them reversing their decision is low.
We basically just wanted to raise some concerns which were not discussed during the Public Hearing last week, since given the outcome, we regret not speaking publicly on these concerns at the time during the meeting.
However, if you can assure us that the required restriction that prohibits short-term rentals will be recorded on this property's deed prior to the issuance of a building permit (as per the Campbell Municipal Code), then perhaps that would be sufficient to dissuade this and future owners of this property from turning this house into a mini- motel, and that would help to allay our and the neighborhood's fears and concerns.
As such, please remove this appeal from your application queue.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Rich Chuang
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 01:21:08 PM PST, Daniel Fama <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Rich – Here’s the invoice your appeal request. Payment can be made at City Hall in the Finance Department. You can pay online by associating the case to your MGO account.
Daniel Fama
9.h
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) Senior Planner
City of Campbell | Community Development
Department
(408) 866-2193
(call or text)
Book a Virtual/In-Person Appointment with a
Planner here.
Apply for Planning and Building Permits
here
.
From:
Rich Chuang
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2023 12:59
PM
To: Clerks Office <[email protected]
>
Cc: Daniel Fama <[email protected]>; Rob Eastwood <[email protected]> Subject: Appeal to Planning Commission's Decision Re: 68 Page St Dear City Clerk,
Please forward to the Planning Commission.
Thank you.
To Planning Commission,
We would like to appeal the decision made by the Campbell Planning Commission regarding 68 Page Street made during the Public Hearing on February 14, 2023.
We reside on Page Street very close to the project site so your decision directly impacts our enjoyment of our neighborhood and our property value, both potentially in a negative way.
Although we firmly believe in adding long-term housing to the area and in the value of ADUs, we feel this particular project may end up doing exactly the opposite if the unusual layout of this small house with six bedrooms (“living room” is same as the
9.h
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) other bedrooms), each with its own en suite bathroom and exterior door, is used as six short-term rentals instead of solely as a single-family home for a single long-term family. In fact, we question if the layout of this house even meets the definition of a single-family home? It was mentioned during the meeting that the initial version of the layout was deemed by the Planning Dept. staff not to look like a single-family home layout so it was revised at least twice, but the latest version actually looks even less like a normal single-family home than the first version in our opinion.
There are also some other concerns which were not discussed during the meeting which we would like to point out:
1. The applicant stated that he plans to live in this house with his wife and parents.
However, what about in the future? The applicant could sell the house in a few years and the new owner could decide to take advantage of the unique layout of this house and utilize the house for a completely different purpose, such as an hourly motel, boarding house, short-term rentals, etc. Once this house is built, it may be there for over 100 years and during that period of time, there could be 10 or 20 different owners, each of whom could potentially use this house for some undesirable purpose other than as a single-family home. We’re not sure if committee members considered this when you made your decisions.
2. If you take a close look at the proposed floorplan, you will see that none of the bedrooms have closets. Not sure if committee members noticed this or not. This indicates to us that these bedrooms may not be designed with long-term occupancy in mind. Most people who live in a bedroom on a regular long-term basis will probably want a closet to store their clothes and other belongings.
However, if you’re staying in the room for only a night or two, you don’t really need a closet since you can just live out of your suitcase or bag for that short period. The lack of closets combined with en suite bathrooms and exterior doors to each bedroom and three separate kitchens makes the layout of this house ripe for abuse to be used as a mini-motel or worse in our opinion.
3. It was mentioned during the meeting that short-term rentals are not allowed in Campbell. However, a quick search on AirBnB shows nearly 100 listings in Campbell, so obviously this ordinance is not enforced, which concerns us about this project. We did find the following in the Campbell Municipal Code:
Section 21.25.080 - General requirements and restrictions.
The following requirements and restrictions apply to all proposed housing developments, inclusive of existing and new primary dwelling units, as applicable:
9.h
Packet Pg. 100
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) G. Short-Term Rentals. Leases for durations of less than thirty days, including short- term rentals are prohibited. The community development director shall require recordation of a deed restriction documenting this requirement prior to issuance of a building permit.
Can we be assured that this requirement will be fulfilled? How will it be enforced?
4. Lastly, the current design of the house has four exterior doors leading to four separate bedrooms on the south side directly facing the neighbor’s house to the south, which will likely be the primary egress for the residents of those four bedrooms. In our opinion, this makes the south side the de facto “front” of the house. Thus, since this narrow alley will be a major pedestrian thoroughfare akin to a sidewalk, should there not be additional setback requirements to insure the privacy of the neighbor and safety of the pedestrians? Given the above concerns, which we believe the rest of our neighborhood also shares, we implore you to reconsider your decisions and encourage you to request the applicant to redesign the layout of this house to that of a more typical, normal single-family home, which is what this property and neighborhood are zoned for.
Thank you very much for your consideration and time.
Sincerely,
Rich Chuang
9.h
Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Ed Barrera <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 11:34 AM
To: Daniel Fama
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Project Adress: 68 Page street; file PLN-2022-01, APN 279-46-021 Hi Daniel,
Following up on last night’s meeting.
I want to recommend that every residence on Maple ave be allocated 2 parking permits on Maple Ave. I want to notified if you plan meet regarding this subject.
I want to restate my opposition to approving the variance and overall design of the proposed structure. There is not
enough room in the lot. The house structure is for “interim housing” and the owners will not be living there for long. The 3 feet to the curve is not sufficient.
As mentioned, I purchased the house at 607 Maple Ave and live there for 7 years. Since that time, we have had
renters(up to 3 people at a time) for approximately 3 years and minimize that wear and tear to the house.
I heard the comments about Campbell is required to increase affordable housing. SFR’s can only contribute to the goal in small and slow way. If you want to make an impact, start putting mixed use condos on the showing centers on Bascom Ave towards the hospital and San Jose City College. You have done it already on Winchester Blvd heading to 280. This is trend already demonstrated by San Jose in downtown area and Cupertino.
Thanks
Ed Barrera
408.464.1975
[email protected]
From: Ed Barrera <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 1:42 PM
To: 'Daniel Fama' <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Project Adress: 68 Page street; file PLN‐2022‐01, APN 279‐46‐021
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the quick response. I will follow up with you.
Ed
From: Daniel Fama <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 11:58 AM
To: Ed Barrera <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Project Adress: 68 Page street; file PLN‐2022‐01, APN 279‐46‐021
9.h
Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Brittany Lynn <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 11:58 AM
To: Daniel Fama
Cc: Shaun Souza
Subject: 68 Page St. Campbell CA 95008
Hi Daniel,
My husband and I live next door (share a fence) with 68 Page street, we are located at 590 Maple Avenue Campbell Ave.
We have seen the new proposed plans for a "single family home" and we have several concerns, documented below:
2 kitchens ‐ there is no house that would fit on a 3k square foot lot that would justify needing 2 kitchens unless this was a hostel or boarding or low income situation. If the designs were an obvious duplex, then sure, but this is not what these plans reflect
4 bedrooms each with an access point to the street ‐ makes literally no sense for a single family home. 5 bathrooms in a 1056 sq foot house ‐ also does not make sense if this was truly a single family home. a 4 bedroom house that will likely be individual units that share a kitchen and common space will only add to more car crowding on Maple and Page.
Can you please clarify what variance he is trying to obtain?
How can we ensure we hear about the hearing?
Let me
know if you have any questions.
Cheers,
Brittany
9.h
Packet Pg. 103
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Christopher Hersh <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 8:47 PM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: 68 Page St Inquiry
Hi Daniel,
My name is CJ Hersh and I own a property on Maple Ave near downtown Campbell. I'm reaching out because I came across the building plans for "68 Page St" and I have some concerns.
Are these building plans approved by the city? The plans basically show a group house, not a single family residence...
Any information regarding the status of this proposal would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
‐CJ
9.h
Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Christopher Hersh <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 10:44 AM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: Re: 68 Page St. Variance Update
Thanks for the update Daniel. I’ll be attending the Planning Commission meeting along with my neighbors. Will also have a law firm review these plans and be in attendance.
Thank you.
On Nov 22, 2022, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Fama <[email protected]> wrote:
Good Morning – The applicant has submitted revised plans for the 68 Page St. Variance application (download here). The plans now show construction of a 1,056 square‐foot single‐ family residence, inclusive of a 313 square‐foot one‐bedroom junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU), with a 529 square‐foot attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU). Please note that State law allows for creation of a primary residence, JADU, and ADU, as proposed. Please see the State’s ADU handbook for further information.
Once this round of review is completed, I will send a follow‐up email confirming the Planning Commission meeting date. If you should have any questions, please feel free to call.
Thank you,
<image002.png>
Daniel Fama
Senior Planner
City of Campbell | Community Development Department
(408) 866-2193 (call or text)
<image003.jpg>
<image004.png>
<image005.png>
<image006.png>
<image007.jpg>
<image008.png>
<image009.png>
Book a Virtual/In-Person Appointment with a Planner here.
Apply for Planning and Building Permits here.
9.h
Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Courtney Elliott <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2022 7:04 PM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: Feedback - 68 Page St (PLN-2022-101)
To whom it may concern,
I just wanted to take a moment and provide public comment for the proposed development at 68 Page St ‐ (PLN‐2022‐ 101). I live across the street from this parcel and while I am in complete favor of SB‐9 and accessory dwelling units (even an
ADU on this property), the proposed floor plan on the courtesy notice webpage for this development seems extremely suspicious and abuses the new ADU law. There are 4 doors with 4 lights near the door that enter into bedrooms (that seems very strange to me), and each bedroom has its own bathroom. This screams tiny 4‐plex or 4 separate rental/Air BnB style units that share a small kitchen and small living room. Is this legal? I also don't understand how this is an ADU, the floorplan looks like just an addition. Initially, the owner told us he was just going to rebuild and live in it alone (and I understand plans change) and now we have 4 doors with 4 bedrooms and 4 bathrooms in a 1500‐ square‐foot house. I urge you to visit the parcel and really see how narrow and small the lot is for 4 rental units. I urge the planning department to reject this variance and encourage the owner to come up with a plan for the house and ADU that is realistic for the lot size (structure size and human density), and neighborhood.
Regards,
Courtney
9.h
Packet Pg. 106
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Courtney Elliott <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2022 7:04 PM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: Feedback - 68 Page St (PLN-2022-101)
To whom it may concern,
I just wanted to take a moment and provide public comment for the proposed development at 68 Page St ‐ (PLN‐2022‐ 101). I live across the street from this parcel and while I am in complete favor of SB‐9 and accessory dwelling units (even an
ADU on this property), the proposed floor plan on the courtesy notice webpage for this development seems extremely suspicious and abuses the new ADU law. There are 4 doors with 4 lights near the door that enter into bedrooms (that seems very strange to me), and each bedroom has its own bathroom. This screams tiny 4‐plex or 4 separate rental/Air BnB style units that share a small kitchen and small living room. Is this legal? I also don't understand how this is an ADU, the floorplan looks like just an addition. Initially, the owner told us he was just going to rebuild and live in it alone (and I understand plans change) and now we have 4 doors with 4 bedrooms and 4 bathrooms in a 1500‐ square‐foot house. I urge you to visit the parcel and really see how narrow and small the lot is for 4 rental units. I urge the planning department to reject this variance and encourage the owner to come up with a plan for the house and ADU that is realistic for the lot size (structure size and human density), and neighborhood.
Regards,
Courtney
9.h
Packet Pg. 107
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Dave Jordan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 9:40 AM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: Re: 68 Page St. Variance Update
Daniel,
The new plan shares the same atrocity level.
I would expect the Campbell CDD to immediately reject this absurd proposal and not rely on the outrage of citizens and neighbors to substantiate the planned misuse of this property.
Thank you,
Dave and Coleen Jordan
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 09:20:56 AM PST, Daniel Fama <[email protected]> wrote:
Good Morning – The applicant has submitted revised plans for the 68 Page St. Variance application (download here). The plans now show construction of a 1,056 square-foot single-family residence, inclusive of a 313 square-foot one-bedroom junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU), with a 529 square- foot attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU). Please note that State law allows for creation of a primary residence, JADU, and ADU, as proposed. Please see the State’s ADU handbook for further information.
Once this round of review is completed, I will send a follow-up email confirming the Planning Commission meeting date. If you should have any questions, please feel free to call.
Thank you,
Daniel Fama
Senior Planner
City of Campbell | Community Development Department
(408) 866-2193 (call or text)
Book a Virtual/In-Person Appointment with a Planner here.
9.h
Packet Pg. 108
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Kay Emmvee <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 10:51 AM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: Re: 68 Page Street - APN: 279-46-021 - disagree with the revised proposal Hi Daniel,
I just received the revised courtesy notice, and this is my observation.
It says it is a single family residence; however, it has 2 Kitchens
5 Bathrooms in a 1056 sq ft house?
4 Bedrooms
6 Entrances to the street. The interesting thing is that these entrances are not showing up in the proposed west elevation (It is only showing one door as opposed to two in proposed floor plan) and only one in the proposed north elevation as opposed to 5 in the proposed floor plan). In total, 4 street entrance doors are missing in the west and north elevation. You can see the 6 entrances in the attached picture.
This to me and my neighbors are still fishy, unless this is a boarding house or a multi‐family residence. I completely disagree with this proposal. Another problem is that these 4 bedrooms can potentially bring 8 new cars to the neighborhood.
9.h
Packet Pg. 109
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 2 Would love to know more. As is, I completely disagree.
Best,
Mark
On Oct 12, 2022, at 2:15 PM, Kay Emmvee <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Daniel, thank you.
On Oct 12, 2022, at 12:30 PM, Daniel Fama <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Mark ‐ Thank you for the email. We are aware of the concerns and are working with the applicant. When we receive revised plans, we'll send out an updated notice.
9.h
Packet Pg. 110
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 3 Daniel
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
From: Kay Emmvee <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 12:10 PM
To: Daniel Fama <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 68 Page Street ‐ APN: 279‐46‐021
Hi Daniel,
Appreciate any update on this.
Thanks,
Mark
On Sep 3, 2022, at 3:27 PM, Kay Emmvee <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I just received the courtesy notice for APN: 279‐46‐021. Based on the proposed south elevation, it looks like a 4‐Plex, not a SFR . If it is a single‐family residence, why do they need four doors facing Maple Avenue? They don’t need an
external door to go from room to
room. Something fishy.
Are they building a new house (1056 sq ft) + ADU + retaining the existing detached non‐conforming garage?
Please let me know.
Best,
Mark
9.h
Packet Pg. 111
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Keith Boyert <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 8:17 AM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: Project: 68 Page street
Daniel Fama,
I would like to comment on the project located at 68 Page St. File No. PLN‐2022‐101, APN 279‐46‐021.
Foremost I am in opposition to the plan as proposed as it has all the appearances of a multiple family residence and is more suited as a temporary multi‐single residence rooms with two common kitchens. This is far from the Zoning area of single‐family residences.
I reside on Maple avenue and would be directly affected as 4 of the single residence rooms would have direct access to Maple Ave.
Maple is a small street and a close‐knit neighborhood and this should be respected and not have an absentee owner build what amounts to a dormitory. Based on the plan submitted there are 2 separate houses as there is no access from the front of the house consisting of a kitchen and 2 bedrooms no common area other than the Kitchen, with back half which consists of a kitchen with 2 bedrooms with full bath and a living room with a full bath which is also irregular in most homes.
I firmly believe this house is not being redesigned for a single residence and must protest to this project.
Regards,
9.h
Packet Pg. 112
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Leann Hammeken <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2023 3:45 PM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: 68 Page St.
Hi Daniel. This is Leanna Hammeken from 587 Maple Ave. I’ve spoken to you on the phone a few times and thank you for answering most of my questions. I’m very upset with this potential hotel being built on Maple Ave. Looking for more answers. Wondering if this is a potential rent by hour situation? By the day/week. Feels like a business for sure and by no means a SFH. We are a family street and already deal with overflow on both Poplar and Paige st. So both ends of Maple take on Greylands, Lloyd square and the Rage hair salon. Have you looked into how dangerous the corner is? I would like to be updated on all city planning meetings. I understand the next one is on Valentine’s Day? Are you trying to deter people from showing up? Time has changed, twice? Please update me!
Thank You,
Leanna Hammeken
587 Maple Ave.
Sent from my iPhone
9.h
Packet Pg. 113
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Kay Emmvee <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 3, 2022 3:27 PM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: 68 Page Street
Hi Daniel,
I just received the courtesy notice for APN: 279‐46‐021. Based on the proposed south elevation, it looks like a 4‐Plex, not a SFR . If it is a single‐family residence, why do they need four doors facing Maple Avenue? They don’t need an external door to go from room to room. Something fishy.
Are they building a new house (1056 sq ft) + ADU + retaining the existing detached non‐conforming garage?
Please let me know.
Best,
Mark
9.h
Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Kay Emmvee <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 11:35 PM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: Re: 68 Page St. Variance Update
Daniel, thanks for sending me the 3rd version of the design. Even the latest design shows 4 units, i.e. 4 kitchens. Is that the plan? I don’t think everyone on Maple agree with this new plan. I’d recommend a zoom call with other home owners on Page and Maple. Please let me know.
Best,
Mark
On Nov 22, 2022, at 9:20 AM, Daniel Fama <[email protected]> wrote:
Good Morning – The applicant has submitted revised plans for the 68 Page St. Variance application (download here). The plans now show construction of a 1,056 square‐foot single‐ family residence, inclusive of a 313 square‐foot one‐bedroom junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU), with a 529 square‐foot attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU). Please note that State law allows for creation of a primary residence, JADU, and ADU, as proposed. Please see the State’s ADU handbook for further information.
Once this round of review is completed, I will send a follow‐up email confirming the Planning Commission meeting date. If you should have any questions, please feel free to call.
Thank you,
Daniel Fama
Senior Planner
City of Campbell | Community Development
Department
(408) 866-2193 (call or text)
9.h
Packet Pg. 115
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Pat Gasaway <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 4:50 PM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: Proposed Plan - 68 Page Street
Hello Daniel,
I’d like the opportunity to follow up on my phone call a couple weeks ago to elaborate on my numerous, deep concerns with the proposed construction at 68 Page Street. I’m sure you’ve already had to field plenty of calls regarding this property so I’ll keep it to a
summary:
Zoning: This project lies deep within an area designated as R‐1(6) (single‐family). Thankfully the numerous attributes of Zone R‐1 are spelled out on the City website and this project absolutely does not qualify. Having 4 bedrooms (likely 5 with the room labeled living room) with 5 bathrooms within a 1,056 SF building isn’t a single family home, it’s an extreme‐density boarding house or dormitory situation.
Parking: Suppose all these rooms were to be occupied someday. With a projected 5‐10 cars for this ‘dwelling’ parked on the street, there simply isn’t the space without hindering all the surrounding neighbors. Unbelievably
selfish.
Aesthetics: The proposed plan for this ‘dwelling’ show 7ea street facing doors consistent with a cheap motel. Going beyond the obvious (that is looks weird), this is not consistent with the surrounding homes which were all build as craftsman cottages around 1948 for the GIs returning from WWII.
It’s obvious that this dwelling is not a single family home and this property owner is being very disingenuous to the City Planning process and purpose. I assure you that all my neighbors share the same concerns and would be extremely disappointed (and flabbergasted) should this project get approved. I’d appreciate being notified should this project make it to the public hearing stage of the planning process.
Thank you for your time,
Patrick Gasaway
627 Maple Avenue
Campbell CA 95008
Patrick Gasaway
Estimating Manager
Cell: (408) 639-9649
Office: (408) 262-1418
9.h
Packet Pg. 116
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Russell Biswell <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 4, 2022 11:38 AM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: 68 Page Street
Mr. Fama,
I would like more information on the proposed project at 68 Page Street. We have lived at 597 Maple Ave for 23 years, very close to this project. The notification we received in the mail says it would be a SFR plus an ADU with non‐ conforming setbacks. But the project image seems to show four separate entrances. I also don't see where the non‐ conforming setbacks will be, on what sides. Those of us in the immediate area are concerned about the number of units/residents as well as the appearance of this project.
Thank you,
Russ Biswell
9.h
Packet Pg. 117
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Russell Biswell <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 9:10 PM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: Re: 68 Page Street
Mr. Fama,
We continue to be very concerned about the 68 Page Street project after receiving the revised courtesy notice. We have been home owners on Maple Avenue, just a few houses away from 68 Page, since 1999. Our understanding is that the project is zoned R‐1‐
6. From the city website, R‐1‐6 is intended “to stabilize and protect the residential characteristics of the district and to encourage a suitable environment for domestic home life”, and, “to provide for detached single‐family homes on larger parcels (ranging from six thousand to sixteen thousand square foot parcels)”. This project seems to be doing the opposite. We don’t know what the “Occupancy R‐3/U” designation means, or how it can be allowed in R‐1‐6, but R‐3 in the city code allows for up to 27 units per acre. On this proposed lot that would allow two units. R‐3 also says multiple units are allowed on parcels of 8,000 sf for three and four‐family units. This lot is only 3,416 sf.
From looking at the revised proposal it is clear that the owner’s intent is to build at least six separate one‐bedroom single‐room‐ occupancy rental units. The many exterior doors, bathrooms and easily dividable “Living Room” make the intention obvious. The six units mentioned does not include any “garage” units, which could easily be added post approval. Therefore, we are talking about six and possibly eight separate single‐room‐occupancy rental units on this small property, which is in a true SFR neighborhood.
Some other initial concerns:
The lot coverage calculation of 42% is over the 40% maximum, and does not include the “garage” square footage. With the “garage” I calculate the coverage at 56.4%.
Are there not on‐site parking requirements that apply to the number of people that will live there? Parking on our street is already limited.
Are there not requirements for open space?
In addition to the extreme density, which is deceitfully proposed, the setback variances are not acceptable. It is one thing to consider variances for projects that fit into the area. This project does not fit and the variances should be denied.
We live on Maple Avenue and this proposed project has our neighborhood extremely concerned. The street is inhabited primarily by long‐time residents. We are a close community neighborhood. We are raising our kids, socializing together and watching out for each other. We are concerned about the character of our neighborhood. Downtown Campbell needs to maintain some true single family residence neighborhoods where people can live, raise families and be long term residents. We do not want a 6‐8 unit single‐room‐ occupancy project with transitory residents on this family street. We realize more housing units are needed, and we are not opposed to homes having ADU’s. But, this proposal is for a high‐density, single‐room‐ occupancy building. We have been meeting and discussing this project since the first notice. There is 100% opposition and we intend to make our opposition well heard. I realize the notice says there will be an opportunity to provide comment before a decision is reached. But, we do not want to wait any longer to provide comments. We also want plenty of advance notice of the meeting where public comments will be allowed. We will be there. We don’t understand how a project of this nature, that is misrepresenting density, can even reach this stage of the approval process.
Thank you,
Russ Biswell and Tonja Chi
9.h
Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Russell Biswell <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2022 10:33 AM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: Re: 68 Page St. Variance Update
Daniel,
I’m not clear on what revisions were made here but the intent of this plan is still obviously to have six separate one‐ bedroom rental units, which is not appropriate for this neighborhood. I have a few questions.
Are there any rules about what can be considered a SFR? I don’t see how the SFR portion of this plan can be considered “single family” with all exterior doors, kitchens and bathrooms.
Are there limits to how many rent paying tenants can live in a SFR?
The ADU handbook says JADU must be entirely within the space of the existing SFR. That does not seem to be case here.
How is the JADU allowed per this rule?
Per the handbook, the owner is required to live in either the remaining portion of the SFR or in the JADU. How long are they required to live there?
Are there design and appearance standards that can be required? The appearance of this project is far below the neighborhood standard.
I don’t mean to be confrontational here but I am wondering if our neighborhood group should hire an attorney. Allowing this project, even if
it is due to Campbell not having met affordable housing requirements, is going to negatively affect the value of our homes. There are going to be six different tenants, on this small lot, all parking on our street. I can see an ADU here along with an actual SFR. But that is not what this plan proposes. This plan is clearly for a multi (6) unit apartment type building.
I look forward to hearing your reply to my questions above.
Thank you,
Russ Biswell
Maple Avenue
From: Daniel Fama <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 9:20:51 AM
Subject: 68 Page St. Variance Update
Good Morning – The applicant has submitted revised plans for the 68 Page St. Variance application (download here). The plans now show construction of a 1,056 square‐foot single‐family residence, inclusive of a 313 square‐foot one‐bedroom junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU), with a 529 square‐foot attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU). Please note that State law allows for creation of a primary residence, JADU, and ADU, as proposed. Please see the State’s ADU handbook for further information.
Once this round of review is completed, I will send a follow‐up email confirming the Planning Commission meeting date. If you should have any questions, please feel free to call.
9.h
Packet Pg. 119
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Shelley Snowdon <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2022 7:50 PM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: 68 Page Street Project
Dear Mr. Fama,
We are completely opposed to the project specifications at 68 Page Street in Campbell, California. Firstly, it is more than doubling in size what was previously there and leaving no property around it whatsoever, save for what look to be two alleyways which would appear to have various entrances leading out to them. In no way do the plans for this building project even resemble a single-residence home plus single ADU. Why would any family home of this size require 5 bathrooms, two kitchens and eight separate entrances if it didn't intend to be a boarding house of some sort?
We object to this project for a number of reasons, least of all because this boarding-house style building will create more traffic and parking issues than already exist in this neighbourhood. It's already dangerous enough trying to exit Maple Ave onto Page Street because of the proximity of cars to the end of the sidewalk. Five or six more residents would triple parking and traffic on that corner alone. Also, it is not clear from the drawing we were provided by the city which side is the street side and which side contains all the entrances. Should the street side be the one without the entrances, then the project would seem to want to create an alleyway that would have four doors on it for, presumably, four separate tenants to live on that side. On the end, there are another two doors which would appear to lead directly off the property. And single entrances on the front and at what we can only guess is the street-side of the property. This drawing is not clear whatsoever in that we can't see the property line, nor do we know where the existing garage is, and we don't know which sides the streets are on. We deserve to be provided a decent drawing that depicts all angles and exactly what is going on with this building project. This is a pathetic attempt at notifying residents of exactly what is happening in this proposal.
As it stands right now, there is very little space between the building and the sidewalk. An entrance out here makes no sense whatsoever and yet at least one will exit directly onto the sidewalk with little to no room for someone to exit without clipping an unsuspecting passerby, should the timing be right. We have two visually impaired children who find it difficult enough to navigate the sidewalks, I can only imagine how difficult it would be for them to have to skirt around entrance steps and adornments, besides. With so many entrances and thus tripping hazards, the surrounding sidewalk had better be ADA compliant with the correct bumps to alert visually impaired people of the entrance or entrances.
A hidden alleyway with various entrances to one building is a cause for concern. This kind of structure just screams criminal activity - dark dealings down various alleyways, and constant in and outs of bedrooms. This is not the kind of thing we residents here in Campbell need, nor want, in our backyard.
We strongly protest this project and do not wish to see a building doubled in size on that lot. We encourage the owner to build back what was previously there while maintaining the look and feel of the city the surrounding residents call their home. This project is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt at building a money-making flop house at the expense of the neighbourhood and neighbours. We are disgusted that this project is even being considered by the city. Many of us in this area are currently residing in our nest eggs. Should this project be allowed to go forward, we would all stand to lose money as what appears to be a boarding house will most definitely decrease our property values.
We urge the city to reconsider any approvals of this project. Please note that we will, along with the rest of our community, fight this to the end.
Yours truly,
Shelley Snowdon
620 Maple Ave,
Campbell, CA
95008
9.h
Packet Pg. 120
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) 1 Daniel Fama
From: Yolanda <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 5, 2022 4:38 PM
To: Daniel Fama
Subject: FW: Courtesy Notice 68 Page Street
Sent from Mail for Windows
From:
Sent: Monday, September 5, 2022 4:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Courtesy Notice 68 Page Street
Hello Daniel,
My name is Yolanda Barrera and the owner of 607 Maple Avenue for over 30 years. I am not in agreement with allowing applicant Yanjun Wang, property owner of 68 Page Street, to construct a 1056 square foot single‐family residence with a
529 square‐foot attached ADU. The lot is very small and cannot provide adequate space for the single family, attached ADU and detached garage. As noted in the courtesy notice the street‐side set backs are substandard. I do not want this permit (project) to be allowed. Currently egress and exit to the area is limited and there is limited street parking. Again I am not in agreement and want to be notified about the public hearing date in order to voice my concerns and hopefully stop this permit process.
Sincerely,
Yolanda Barrera
607 Maple Avenue
Campbell, CA
Email: [email protected]
Sent from Mail for Windows
9.h
Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval)
9.h
Packet Pg. 122
Attachment: Public Comment (PLN-2022-10 ~ 68 Page St. - Appeal of Variance Approval) City
Council
Report
TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance to Extend Interim Ordinance No. 2291 that Adopted Urgency Revisions to Title 21 Related to Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) to Conform with Recent State Legislation (AB-2221 and SB-897). (Ordinance//Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that City Council adopt an ordinance to extend Interim Ordinance No. 2291 to June 30, 2023.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This action is Statutorily Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 21080.17, which exempts the adoption of a local ordinance to implement the provisions of Section 65852.1 or Section 65852.2 of the Government Code relating to the accessory dwelling units.
BACKGROUND
Senate Bill No. 897 (SB-897) and Assembly Bill No. 2221 (AB-2221) 1 took effect January 1, 2023. These laws further limited the City's regulation of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units by incorporating new limitations on building height, front-setbacks, interior access, parking, Building Code occupancy, fire sprinklers, legalization of unpermitted ADUs.
Since the City was not compliance with the new requirements of State law as of January 1st, the City's entire existing ADU ordinance became null and void pursuant to Government Code § 65852.2(a)(6). As such, the City Council took action to adopt an interim ordinance on an urgency basis to align the City's local ADU regulations with State legislation at its February 7, 2023 meeting. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858, the interim ordinance is in effect for 45 days, expiring March 24, 2023.
1 Both AB 2221 and SB 897 w ere signed into law, but AB 2221 was superseded because it would have amended the same statute that SB 897 amended, and SB 897 was signed into law (chaptered) later.
However, section 2.5 of SB 897 expressly includes, among others, changes to the ADU law th at would have been made by AB 2221.
Item: 10
Category: PUBLIC HEARINGS AND
INTRODUCTION OF
ORDINANCES
Meeting Date: March 21, 2023
10 Packet Pg. 123
Extension of the ADU Interim Ordinance Page 2 of 3
Following initial adoption, the Government Code allows a city to extend an interim ordinance for a period up to 10 months and 15 days after a noticed public hearing. The additional time is intended to allow for the preparation of a formal ordinance and/or adoption of policy to address the land use matter that prompted the need for an interim ordinance.
DISCUSSION
The draft ordinance (reference Attachment A ) would extend Interim Ordinance No. 2291 for approximately three months until June 30, 2023, or adoption of an ordinance to make the urgency revisions permanent, whichever comes first.
NEXT STEPS
Permanent adoption of the ADU ordinance revisions has been incorporated into an upcoming Comprehensive Municipal Code Update that wi ll be considered in combination with adoption of the 2040 General Plan, Housing Element, and Multi - Family Development and Design Standards (MFDDS) in April.
PUBLIC NOTICE
A notice of this public hearing was published in the Metro Silicon Valley newspaper and posted on the City's public notices page and pushed through the City's social media channels. No comment has been received.
FISCAL IMPACT
This action will have no fiscal impact.
Prepared by:
Daniel Fama, Senior Planner
Reviewed by:
Rob Eastwood, Community
Development Director
10 Packet Pg. 124
Extension of the ADU Interim Ordinance Page 3 of 3
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
a. ADU Interim Ordinance - Extension Ordinance
10 Packet Pg. 125
Ordinance No. _____
BEING AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL EXTENDING URGENCY REVISIONS TO TITLE 21 RELATED TO ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS TO CONFORM WITH RECENT STATE LEGISLATION (AB-2221 AND SB-897), ADOPTED UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 2291. PLN-2022-166
WHEREAS, on September 28, 2022, the Governor of the State of California signed into law Senate Bill No. 897 (Wieckowski) and Assembly Bill No. 222 1 (Quirk-Silva), which combined, amended Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22, and created Section 65852.23, and amended Health and Safety Code Section 17980.12, pertaining to the creation of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units, and which took effect January 1, 2023.
WHEREAS, there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare based on the passage of SB-897 (Wieckowski) and AB-2221 (Quirk-Silva) in that the City’s local accessory dwelling unit ordinance is no longer consistent with Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 as of January 1, 2023, rendering the City's ordinance null and void, thereby limiting the City to applying the few default statutory standards provided in the aforementioned Government Code sections for the approval of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units.
WHEREAS, the City is undertaking a study to development permanent zoning standards to conform its current zoning code provisions to conform to the changes in the State law, which shall be completed within a reasonable time, not to exceed 23 months from the adoption of this interim ordinance.
WHEREAS, the City seeks to avoid any conflicts with the contemplated permanent zoning standards implementing State law.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 65858 of the Government Code and Section
21.60.090 of the Campbell Municipal Code, the City Council may take appropriate action to adopt urgency measures as an interim ordinance.
WHEREAS, the approval of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units based solely on the few default statutory standards of the California Government Code, without local regulations governing height, setback, landscape, and architec tural review, among other things, would threaten the character of existing neighborhoods, negatively impact property values, personal privacy, fire safety , and create confusion that would hinder the creation of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units within the community.
WHEREAS, on February 7, 2023, the City Council adopted an i nterim ordinance (Ordinance No. 2291) to adopt urgency revisions to Title 21 related to accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs) to conform with recent state legislation (AB-2221 and SB-897).
10.a
Packet Pg. 126
Attachment: ADU Interim Ordinance - Extension Ordinance (Extension of the ADU Interim Ordinance)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 65858 of the Government Code, the City Council may extend the interim ordinance for 10 months and 15 days after public notification and following a public hearing.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the extending Interim Ordinance No. 2291 would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the city; and is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of the Campbell Municipal Code.
WHEREAS, adoption of this ordinance is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 21080.17, which exempts the adoption of an local ordinance to implement the provisions of Section 65852.1 or Section 65852.2 of the Government Code relating to the accessory dwelling units.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1 (SEVERABILITY): If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 2 (PUBLICATION): The City Clerk shall cause this interim ordinance to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation within 15 days after its adoption in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.
SECTION 3 (APPLICABILITY): This ordinance is applicable to the creation of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units, including such units that are created as part of a "SB-9 proposed housing development" pursuant to Chapter 21.25 (Two-Unit Housing Developments).
SECTION 4 (EFFECTIVENESS): Interim Ordinance No. 2291 is hereby extended to June 30, 2023, or until it is superseded by adoption of superseding ordinance, whichever comes first.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ____________, 2023 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
APPROVED:
________________________
Anne Bybee, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk
10.a
Packet Pg. 127
Attachment: ADU Interim Ordinance - Extension Ordinance (Extension of the ADU Interim Ordinance)
City
Council
Report
TITLE: Authorization of the Semi -Permanent Parklet Grant Program Per Section 53083 (A)(6)(B) of the Government Code (AB 562 ) (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt a Resolution determining findings for the City’s Semi - Permanent Parklet Grant Program are consistent with Section 53083 (a)(6)(b) of the Government Code (AB 562 )
BACKGROUND
The City Co uncil approved recommendations on January 18th, April 19th, July 5 th, September 20, and October 4, 2022 to create a semi -permanent parklet program in the Downtown. On July 5, Ordinance 2285 adding Chapter 11.15 (Parklets in the Public Right-of-Way) to the Campbell Municipal Code was adopted by Council which would allow a transition from the existing temporary parklets to semi -permanent parklets, incorporating a more uniform, design aesthetic and eliminating the use of concrete “k - rails”. In addition, Council adopted Resolution 12858 approving the adoption of a Semi - Permanent Parklet Program Guide. The semi -permanent parklets enable the City to continue support of Downtown restaurants concerning ongoing economic impacts from the pandemic, and associated cha llenges. The new Semi -Permanent Parklet Program (Program) incorporates feedback from key stakeholders using surveys and outreach meetings with businesses, and extensive research and information from other cities that have implemented similar parklet programs.
On October 4, 2022, the City Council also approved Ordinance 2289 approving Amendments to the Semi -Permanent Parklet Program Guide to incorporate preferred parklet designs. The ordinance also included an amendment to the City’s Master Fee Schedule to not reduce the Parklet Permit Application Fee from $1,500 to $500, deferred the effective date of the Parklet Annual Compliance Verification Fee to FY 2024, and removed security deposits related to parklets in the public right -of-way, and approving associated budget adjustments for FY 2023.
The Program allows for up to 16 parklets with a maximum of two parking spaces for each, for a total of 32 total parking spaces. The design firm of Sidell -Parkrevan was retained to create parklet designs for the Program. Businesses may choose one of two designs, with or without roofs.
Item: 11
Category: PUBLIC HEARINGS AND
INTRODUCTION OF
ORDINANCES
Meeting Date: March 21, 2023
11 Packet Pg. 128
Semi Permanent Parklet Grant Program Page 2 of 4
In adopting the Program, Council also authorized the creation of a grant program of up to $400,000 to assist businesses with the cost of construction . This amount was intended to cover eligible labor and materials costs that will be reimbursed upon completion of the parklets and submittal of documentation showing payment for eligible costs. The source of the grant funds would be American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds.
Per Section 53083 (a)(6)(b) of the State of California’s Government Code (AB 562) a public hearing is required to present findings and benefits derived when public funds are used for an economic development subsidy or assistance , such as the parklet grant program. This Council report provides the information required by state law including:
• Program schedule or term
• Names and addresses of business entities receiving assistance • Description of the economic development subsidy including estimated total amount of public funds expended or revenue lost to the local agency • A statement of public purposes for the economic development assistance • Projected tax revenue to the local agency as a result of the assistance • Estimated number of jobs created by the economic development subsidy, broken down by full-time, part-time, and temporary positions
The law also requires this information to remain available to the public and posted to the agency’s website for the entire term of the subsidy.
DISCUSSION
The City’s Program was laun ched on January 9, 2023. Eligible b usinesses had until February 6, 2023, to submit applications for parklet permits and grants. Nine (9) applications for parklet permits and grants were received and deemed complete on March 1, 2023 . Parklet permit plans a re currently being developed for each applicant and should be approved by mid to late April , with construction starting at the same time.
Temporary parklets must be removed by the businesses by March 28, 2023.
Construction of parklets must be completed by September 29, 2023, and all documentation for reimbursement of eligible parklet costs must be submitted to the City by October 30, 2023.
The grant amount is up to $40,000 for each business for eligible construction -related expenses for a total of $360, 000, per the guidelines established by Council . Final approval and award of the grants after this public hearing is pending the following:
• Execution of a grant agreement between the City and business and property owners (of the business location)
• Confirmation the parklet contractor has met the City’s requirements 11 Packet Pg. 129
Semi Permanent Parklet Grant Program Page 3 of 4
• An approved parklet permit and agreement between the City and the property owner
As documented in the attached resolution, consistent with state required findings, the parklet grant program will help restaurants recover losses sustained during the pandemic, including impacts such as increased operating costs due to high inflation and ongoing supply chain difficulties. Businesses estimate the parklet dining and grant will add seven full -time and seventeen part-time jobs. As these businesses recover sales, the city estimates that sales tax revenue will increase by $50,000 annually.
Grant applications required businesses to include a statement of need, a current business license, insurance, and a W -9. Applicants were screened to determine they were in good standing with the city with no outstanding code complaints or incomplete permits. Both the parklet permit and grant application and final agreements require the signature of the business owner(s ) and property owners(s). Once completed the parklets will be owned by property owners and the permit agreement will be recorded on the property deed. Businesses will then be able to submit receipts and other documentation for reimbursement of eligible labor and materials costs.
The names and addresses of all business entities, except sole proprietorships, that are the recipients of the grants are listed in Attachment B.
The required information including a list of businesses that received grants will be posted on the City’s website for the term of the economic development assistance.
Staff will provide updates on the Program during the construction schedule.
FISCAL IMPACT
The total amount of funding for the nine parklet grants is $360,000 ; thereby l eaving $40,000 remaining from the Council approved program appropriation of $400,000. The source of funds is part of the City’s allocation from the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program, a part of the American Rescue Plan. The remaining $40,000 program allocation will return to the ARPA fund balance at the end of FY 2023 unless directed by Council towards another purpose or business.
Prepared by:
Leslie Parks, Economic Development
Reviewed by:
11 Packet Pg. 130
Rob Eastwood, Community
Development Director
Semi Permanent Parklet Grant Program Page 4 of 4
Approved by:
Angelique Gaeta, Assistant City
Manager
Attachment:
a. Resolution
b. List of Businesses Receiving Semi-Permanent Parklet Grants 11 Packet Pg. 131
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL
DETERMINING FINDINGS FOR THE SEMI -PERMANENT PARKLET GRANT PROGRAM ARE CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 53083 (a)(6)(b) OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE (AB 562)
WHEREAS, to continue assisting Downtown restaurants with recovery from the economic impacts of the COVID -19 pandemic, on July 5, 2022 , the City Council, adopted Ordinance 2285 adding Chapter 11.15 (Parklets in the Public Right -of-Way) to the Campbell Municipal Code and adopted Resolution 12858 approving the adoption of a Semi -Permanent Parklet Program Guide;
WHEREAS, to continue assisting Downtown restaurants’ with recovery from the economic impacts of the COVID -19 pandemic, on October 4, 2022, the City Council approved Ordinance 2289 approving Amendments to the Semi -Permanent Parklet Program Guide to inc orporate preferred parklet design s), an amendment to the City’s Master Fee Schedule to not reduce the Parklet Permit Application Fee from $1,500 to $500, deferring the effective date of the Parklet Annual Compliance Verification Fee to FY 2024, removing security deposits related to parklets in the public right -of-way, and approving associated budget adjustments for FY 2023; setting a $400,000 allocation of American Recovery Act Funds ( ARPA) funds for the Semi -Permanent Parklet Grant P rogram to assist busine sses with the parklet construction for up to 16 parklets with a minimum grant of $25,000 and a maximum grant of $40,000 depending on the number of grants approved;
WHEREAS, Nine (9) Downtown businesses are recommended to be approved for grants up to $40,000 to assist with the construction costs of the parklets , expand dining options for visitors and local residents , increase sales for businesses and s ales tax revenues for the City and also add to the economic stability of the Downtown.
WHEREAS the findings associated with the parklet grants or economic assistance for businesses constitute a development subsidy consistent with Section 53083 (a)(6)(b) of the Government Code (AB 562) of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Council finds that the grants are approved under this resolution and will foster recovery for Campbell businesses from the economic impacts of the COVID -19 pandemic, and will enhance the vitality of the City’s downtown core by facilitating the installation of semi - permanent parklets in the downtown area , enhancing the consumer and business experience;
2. The grants shall be made available commencing March 1, 2023 and shall terminate upo n distribution of the final reimbursement payments for in stallation of the semi -permanent parklets;
3. The City Council authorizes grants to the businesses set forth in Attachment B in an amount not to exceed $40,000 in reimbursement for actual expenses incurred for installation of semi-permanent parklets;
4. The total grant expenditure by the City shall not exceed $400,000;
11.a
Packet Pg. 132
Attachment: Resolution (Semi Permanent Parklet Grant Program)
5. The projected tax r evenue to the City as a result of the grants is estimated to be $ 50,000 annually;
6. The estimated jobs created by the grants are projected to be:
Full-time: Seven
Part-time: Seventeen
Temporary: None
7. Every grant recipient shall execute an agreement in a form satisfactory to the City Manager and City Attorney regarding the use of such grant funds;
8. A copy of this Resolution shall be made available to the public upon request, and shall be posted on the City’s website for the duration of the grant program.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of March 21, 2023, by the following roll call vote AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSENT: Councilmembers
APPROVED:
___________________________
Anne Bybee, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk
11.a
Packet Pg. 133
Attachment: Resolution (Semi Permanent Parklet Grant Program) ATTACHMENT B: List of Businesses Receiving Semi-Permanent Parklet Grants
1. Name of Business and Address: Ezmzpj group Inc DBA A Bellagio, 33 S. Central Ave., Campbell, CA 95008
2. Name of Business and Address: Flights Restaurant Group, Inc., a Nevada C Corporation DBA Flights, 368 E. Campbell Ave., Campbell CA 95008
3. Business Owner, Name of Business and Address: O.M. Inc. DBA Aqui Cal-Mex, 201 E. Campbell Ave., Campbell, CA 95008
4. Name of Business and Address: Carol Pouya, Sole Proprietor, Tessora's Barra Di Vino 284 E. Campbell Ave, Campbell CA 95008
5. Name of Business and Address: MDB21 Inc S corporation DBA Naschmarkt, 384 E. Campbell Ave., Campbell CA 95008
6. Name of Business and Address: Katie Blooms Inc., II DBA Katie Bloom’s, 369 E.
Campbell Ave., Campbell CA 95008
7. Name of Business and Address: Manresa Bread Project LP DBA Manresa Bread, 195 E. Campbell Ave., Campbell, CA 95008
8. Name of Business and Address: Mario Corporation DBA Trattoria 360 , 284 E.
Campbell Ave., Campbell CA 95008
9. Name of Business and Address: SC Campbell LP, A California S Corp, DBA Sushi Confidential, 247 E. Campbell Ave., Campbell CA 95008
11.b
Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: List of Businesses Receiving Semi-Permanent Parklet Grants (Semi Permanent Parklet Grant Program)
City
Council
Report
TITLE: Review of Campbell Statement of Values
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council review Campbell’s Statement of Values and reaffirm it with any desired adjustments.
BACKGROUND
An Ethics Subcommittee was appointed in November 2005 to develop a Statement of Values. The committee included Council representatives, the City Manager, the City Clerk, and members of the public. The following key points were identified by the Ethics Subcommittee as it developed the Campbell Statement of Values:
• The Statement of Values should express the standards for the highest integrity and ethical conduct expected for elected officials, appointed commissioners and board members, executive staff and candidates for local office;
• The purpose was to create a proactive statement of the community’s values and to prevent future ethics-related problems;
• The Statement of Values is to be a “living” document, to be reviewed bi -annually; and
• The Statement of Values should be voluntary, and all stakeholders are encouraged to not only understand and affirm its values, but to uphold them as they conduct their duties as public officials.
The City Council adopted Resolution 10621 in March 2006, to formally approve a Statement of Values. In February 2009, the City Council adopted Resolution 10998 amending the Statement of Values to include additional language. This document identifies the six core values as the standards by which City officials shoul d perform their duties on behalf of the citizens they represent and serve . These values are listed as follows: Community; Honesty; Civility; Equality; Teamwork; and Accountability.
DISCUSSION
Item: 12
Category: NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: March 21, 2023
12 Packet Pg. 137
Review of Campbell Statement of Values Page 2 of 2
The Statement of Values is a “living” document; it is reviewe d bi -annually in odd - numbered years following a Council election. This allows the newly seated City Council an opportunity to review the Statement of Values and discuss any changes that might be desired.
Attached is the Campbell Statement of Values for th e Council’s review and discussion of any modifications that may be desired at this time.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Do not renew the Statement of Values.
2. Provide other direction to staff.
Prepared by:
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk
Approved by:
Angelique Gaeta, Assistant City
Manager
Attachment:
a. Campbell Statement of Values
12 Packet Pg. 138
CAMPBELL STATEMENT OF VALUES
Preamble:
To promote and foster the highest degree of public trust, the Campbell City Council ha s adopted a Statement of Values reflecting the core beliefs of the community. These key values are deeply held beliefs that in fluence a person’s attitude, actions and decisions.
Values, in turn, form the basis for ethical decisions. Ethics are standards or principles for how we treat one another.
The Campbell Statement of Values expresses the standards for the highest integr ity and ethical conduct expected for elected officials, appointed commissioners and board members, executive staff and candidates for local office. These individuals have the responsibility to assure that they understand and follow, in every respect, the ethical standards so that the public can continue to have full confidence in its officials , candidates, and the democratic process.
Ethical behavior requires a commitment to live
by the values expressed below.
This Statement of Values is expected to be a “living” document and reviewed or updated periodically; initially in February 2007 and in February of odd-numbered years thereafter.
Community
As I serve Campbell:
I value the importance of building and preserving community in Campbell I am a steward for the community’s economy, environment, culture and safety
I am engaged and responsive when serving the community; the needs and concerns of all residents are important to me
I take into consideration the long-term financial needs of the City while also balancing Campbell’s identity as a small town with connected neighborhoods Honesty
As I serve Campbell:
My words and deeds will be based on truthfulness
I will conduct myself with the highest degree of sincerity I
will not knowingly use inaccurate information nor omit relevant information to support my positions or views
I take responsibility for my actions and do not leave false impressions Civility
As I serve Campbell:
I treat everyone the way I want to be treated, with respect and dignity I practice patience, courtesy, and civility in all interactions I understand differences of opinion and policy disagreements are part of the democratic process; I respect the opinions of those with whom I differ I support effective two-way communication by listening carefully, asking questions and determining an appropriate response
12.a
Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: Campbell Statement of Values (Review of Campbell Statement of Values) Equality
As I serve Campbell:
I value everyone’s opinion and listen to all sides
I encourage public input as well as equal access and treat ment for all I am impartial and make decisions based on the merits of the issue Teamwork
As I serve Campbell:
I will actively participate in a po sitiv e and constructive manner I encourage and support collaboration and strive for consensus building I value diversity and seek divergent viewpoints from people of all backgrounds I am approachable and open-minded
I understand that my position may not always prevail but that I support the democratic process and the decisions resulting from it
Accountability
As I serve Campbell:
I hold myself accountable to the highest ethical standards I take responsibility for my conduct and am willing to explain my actions and decisions
I recognize that the responsibility for making decisions about the use of public resources is a public trust
As a representative of, or candidate for an office in, the City of Campbell, I agree to uphold the Campbell Statement of Values adopted by the City Council. I affirm that I have read , understood and will conduct myself in accordance with the City of Campbell’s Statement of Values.
________________________________ ________________
Name Date
Adopted by the Campbell City Council on March 21, 2006.
Updated February 17, 2009, Resolution #10998
12.a
Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: Campbell Statement of Values (Review of Campbell Statement of Values)
City
Council
Report
TITLE: Code of Conduct Policy for Boards and Commissions
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Consider adoption of a Code of Conduct Policy for City Boards and Commissions.
BACKGROUND
On August 25, 2022, staff presented the City Council with a report on the preparation of a “Code of Conduct” policy for City of Campbell (City) boards and commissions. The purpose of the policy would be to provide clear guidance to members of the City’s boards and commissions on how to avoid perceived conflicts of interest, in furtherance of the City’s Statement of Values. The City Council provided feedback and directed the City Manager to incorporate its feedback into a draft policy, vet the draft poli cy through the City’s boards and commissions, and return to the City Council with a final draft of the policy.
On December 6, 2022, staff presented a draft Code of Conduct policy to the Council.
The policy provided direction for board members and commis sioners on avoiding perceived conflicts of interest and identified actions that could create a perceived conflict of interest. Staff further advised the Council that the draft policy had been vetted through the City Attorney, executive staff members, and the following:
• Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee
• Civic Improvement Commission
• Historic Preservation Board
• Parks & Recreation Commission
• Planning Commission
Following staff’s presentation, Council directed staff to update the policy to: include language directing members and commissioners to confer with the City Attorney if there was a question regarding the existence of a conflict of interest, both actual and perceived; include a clear definition of an actual conflict of interest; and include language on how the policy would be enforced if violated. Council further requested staff develop a list of FAQs to aid board members and commissioners in their interpretation of the policy related to perceived conflicts of interest.
DISCUSSION
Item: 13
Category: NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: March 21, 2023
13 Packet Pg. 141
Code of Conduct for Boards and Commissions Page 2 of 3
Attached to this report is the updated policy (Attachment A) that includes direction to board members and commissioners to confer with the City Attorney if they are uncertain as to the existence of either an actual or perceived conflict of interest; includes a clear definition of an actual conflict of interest; and includes language providing for enforcement when a violation of the policy has occurred. The updated policy further provides that if a violation has been deemed to have occurred, the Council has the option of removing a board member or commissioner from their respective board or commission, as provided for in Title 2 of the Campbell Municipal Code. Also attached to this report (Attachment B) is an FAQ addressing perceived conflicts of interest.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact related to the adoption of the policy. Implementation of any additional processes related to the policy will be absorbed by the responsibilities of the City Manager’s Office.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Provide alternate language to include in the policy.
2. Do not adopt the policy and provide other direction.
Prepared by:
Angelique Gaeta, Assistant City
Manager
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
13 Packet Pg. 142
Code of Conduct for Boards and Commissions Page 3 of 3
Attachment:
a. Code of Conduct Board Members and Commissioners - Marked Up b. Code of Conduct Board Members and Commissioners - Clean Version c. Code of Conduct FAQs_March 21 2023
13 Packet Pg. 143
____________________________________________________________________________________ -1-
Code of Conduct – City of Campbell Boards & Commissions March 21, 2023
Council Policy X.XX
DRAFT Code of Conduct Policy
City of Campbell Board Members & Commissioners
Policy Purpose:
The purpose of this policy is t o establish rules for individuals who serve on one of the City of Campbell’s (City) boards or commissions when there is a conflict of interest, including a perceived conflict of interest, with an item that is being or will be considered by the City Council or any City board or commission. The provisions of this policy are in addition to any ethical obligations imposed by applicable law.
Actual Conflict of Interest:
Pursuant to Chapter 2.40 of the Campbell Municipal Code, no City board member or commissioner shall make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use their official position to influence a governmental decision in which they know or have reason to know they have a financial interest.
A board member or commissioner has a financial interest in a decision within the meaning of the California Political Reform Act if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision will have a material financial effect, distinguishable from its effect on the public generally, on the board member or commissioner, on a member of their immediate family, or on any business entity, real property, or source of income in which they have a direct or indirect investment.
Perceived Conflict of Interest:
In addition to actual conflicts of interest, Aa member of a City board or commission shall not participate in any decision in which the member has a perceived conflict of interest as defined in this policy.
A perceived conflict of interest means a situation where a member of a City board or commission is affiliated with a person or organization that has taken a position on a matter coming before the City Council or any City board or commission and the member would appear, to a reasonable and well- informed person, to have aligned his/hertheir interest with that person or organization in such a way that would affect the independence, impartiality and objectivity of the member’s role as a City board member or commissioner.
Prohibited actions involving a perceived conflict of interest by member of a City board or commission may include, but not be limited to:
• Representing, appearing for, or speaking on behalf of a person or organization with which the member is affiliated on a matter that has come or will come before the City Council or any City board or commission; or
• Representing, appearing for, or speaking on behalf of a person or organization with which the member is affiliated before another governmental agency on a matter pending before that governmental agency and the matter has come, or the member should reasonably
13.a
Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: Code of Conduct Board Members and Commissioners - Marked Up (Code of Conduct for Boards and Commissions) ____________________________________________________________________________________ -2-
Code of Conduct – City of Campbell Boards & Commissions March 21, 2023
know the matter will come, before the City Council or any City board or commission, and on which the City has not made a final decision.
Conference with City Attorney:
Any board member or commissioner who is unclear on whether an actual or perceived conflict of interest exists shall confer with the City Attorney prior to taking any action outlined above.
When a Conflict is Deemed to Exist:
When an actual or perceived conflict is deemed to exist on a particular matter, the board member or commissioner who has the conflict of interest shall not attempt to use their official position to influence a governmental decision on that matter. In addition, the board member or commissioner shall publicly identify the conflict of interest and leave the room before the matter is discussed.
Removal:
Any violation of this policy will be reported to the City Council for further action, including but not limited to removal of the board member or commissioner from their respective board or commission. Per Title 2 of the Campbell Municipal Code, board members and commissioners may be removed by a majority vote of the City Council.
13.a
Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: Code of Conduct Board Members and Commissioners - Marked Up (Code of Conduct for Boards and Commissions) ____________________________________________________________________________________ -1-
Code of Conduct – City of Campbell Boards & Commissions March 21, 2023
Council Policy X.XX
DRAFT Code of Conduct Policy
City of Campbell Board Members & Commissioners
Policy Purpose:
The purpose of this policy is t o establish rules for individuals who serve on one of the City of Campbell’s (City) boards or commissions when there is a conflict of interest, including a perceived conflict of interest, with an item that is being or will be considered by the City Council or any City board or commission. The provisions of this policy are in addition to any ethical obligations imposed by applicable law.
Actual Conflict of Interest:
Pursuant to Chapter 2.40 of the Campbell Municipal Code, no City board member or commissioner shall make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use their official position to influence a governmental decision in which they know or have reason to know they have a financial interest.
A board member or commissioner has a financial interest in a decision within the meaning of the California Political Reform Act if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision will have a material financial effect, distinguishable from its effect on the public generally, on the board member or commissioner, on a member of their immediate family, or on any business entity, real property, or source of income in which they have a direct or indirect investment.
Perceived Conflict of Interest:
In addition to actual conflicts of interest, a member of a City board or commission shall not participate in any decision in which the member has a perceived conflict of interest as defined in this policy.
A perceived conflict of interest means a situation where a member of a City board or commission is affiliated with a person or organization that has taken a position on a matter coming before the City Council or any City board or commission and the member would appear, to a reasonable and well- informed person, to have aligned their interest with that person or organization in such a way that would affect the independence, impartiality and objectivity of the member’s role as a City board member or commissioner.
Prohibited actions involving a perceived conflict of interest by member of a City board or commission may include, but not be limited to:
• Representing, appearing for, or speaking on behalf of a person or organization with which the member is affiliated on a matter that has come or will come before the City Council or any City board or commission; or
• Representing, appearing for, or speaking on behalf of a person or organization with which the member is affiliated before another governmental agency on a matter pending before that governmental agency and the matter has come, or the member should reasonably
13.b
Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: Code of Conduct Board Members and Commissioners - Clean Version (Code of Conduct for Boards and Commissions) ____________________________________________________________________________________ -2-
Code of Conduct – City of Campbell Boards & Commissions March 21, 2023
know the matter will come, before the City Council or any City board or commission, and on which the City has not made a final decision.
Conference with City Attorney:
Any board member or commissioner who is unclear on whether an actual or perceived conflict of interest exists shall confer with the City Attorney prior to taking any action outlined above.
When a Conflict is Deemed to Exist:
When an actual or perceived conflict is deemed to exist on a particular matter, the board member or commissioner who has the conflict of interest shall not attempt to use their official position to influence a governmental decision on that matter. In addition, the board member or commissioner shall publicly identify the conflict of interest and leave the room before the matter is discussed.
Removal:
Any violation of this policy will be reported to the City Council for further action, including but not limited to removal of the board member or commissioner from their respective board or commission. Per Title 2 of the Campbell Municipal Code, board members and commissioners may be removed by a majority vote of the City Council.
13.b
Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: Code of Conduct Board Members and Commissioners - Clean Version (Code of Conduct for Boards and Commissions) Code of Conduct FAQs: Page 1 of 2
March 21, 2023
Council Policy X.XX
Code of Conduct Policy
City of Campbell Board Members & Commissioners
FAQs – Perceived Conflicts of Interest
For purposes of these FAQs “City” shall mean the City of Campbell and “board members” and “commissioners” shall mean those members belonging to a City of Campbell board or commission.
Question 1 What does it mean to say that a member of a City board or commission is “affiliated” with a person or organization?
Response In this context, it means that the board member or commissioner is closely connected with, associated with, or related to a particular person, group, party, company, etc.
Question 2 If a member of a board or commission identifies a perceived conflict of interest based on their membership in an advocacy organization and items coming before the City Council, should they: (a) recuse only on the item itself (b) step down from the board / commission permanently or (c) step down from their membership in the advocacy organization?
Response In each instance where a member believes a perceived conflict of interest exists, the member should recuse themself from the specific item.
If a member is unclear whether the policy applies to the situation, the member should consult with the City Attorney, as provided for in the policy.
Question 3 If a member of a board or commission is appointed to an organization during their time on the board or commission and the appointment could present a perceived conflict of interest in the future, should the member immediately step down from the board or commission? Response Perceived conflicts of interest should be considered when they are believed to arise and, on a case-by-case basis. If at that time it is determined that a perceived conflict of interest does in fact exist, the member should recuse themself from the item being considered.
Question 4 If the City has taken a position on proposed state legislation, can a member of a board or commission advocate separately regarding that legislation (i.e., on behalf of an organization)?
Response Yes, if they do so as an individual and not as a member of the board or commission and not as a representative speaking on behalf of the City.
13.c
Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: Code of Conduct FAQs_March 21 2023 (Code of Conduct for Boards and Commissions) Code of Conduct FAQs: Page 2 of 2
March 21, 2023
Question 5 Can a member of a board or commission, who is also a member of an advocacy organization, advocate to another city (i.e., Cupertino) on an issue (i.e., developing trails) before that city?
Response Yes, if they do not hold themselves out to that city as a member of a City board or commission or represent that they are speaking on behalf of the City of Campbell.
Question 6 If a member of a board or commission is part of an advocacy organization and advocating on a certain issue, how would they know if the issue will come before the City of Campbell’s Council in the future? Response They likely won’t. Perceived conflicts of interest should be considered when they arise and, on a case-by-case basis. If at that time, it is determined that a perceived conflict of interest does exist, the member should recuse themself from the item.
Question 7 Does this policy prohibit board members or commissioners from participating in other non-City organizations?
Response The policy alone would not prohibit board members or commissioners from participating in other non-City organizations.
Question 8 If a member of a board or commission is affiliated with a special interest group can that member represent the special interest group’s position before the state on a matter that the board or commission has already taken a position?
Response No. Once the City board or commission has spoken on an issue, a board member or commissioner must not represent the interests of other groups on that same matter before any government agency. However, the board member or the commissioner may speak as an individual, not representing the City or the special interest group, before the government agency.
13.c
Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: Code of Conduct FAQs_March 21 2023 (Code of Conduct for Boards and Commissions) City
Council
Report
TITLE: Adoption of Fiscal Year 2024 City Council Priorities
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council adopt the proposed Fiscal Year 2024 City Council Priorities.
BACKGROUND
As part of its budget process , the City Council meets annually to set the City-wide priorities for the upcoming fiscal year. The priorities serve to reflect the policies, goals, programs, service priorities , and values of the City Council and the community. This year the City Council conducted the priorities meeting on February 16 , 2023. At that meeting, senior staff presented to the Council a status update on the existing staff workplans and programs for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 . Members of the public participated and provided their input and Councilmembers individually provided their perspectives and comments to the ongoing workplans and future priorities.
The City Council , by consensus , agreed that the following four priorities should be continued as priorities for FY 2024:
• Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing
• Measure O
• Financial Stability
• Sustainability
There was also Council consensus to add a fifth priority related to Community Health and Safety.
While many comments by Coun cilmembers were supported by other Councilmembers, there was insufficient time at the meeting to fully discuss the individual comments and determine if there was consensus on all topics mentioned.
At th e March 21 meeting, the City Council is requested t o review the priorities and Councilmembers’ comments to determine if there is City Council consensus with the areas of focus within each priority.
Once the priorities are determined by Council , staff will develop and propose staff workplans, and an operating and capital budget at the April 25 Budget Study Session.
Item: 14
Category: UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Meeting Date: March 21, 2023
14 Packet Pg. 150
Adoption of Fiscal Year 2024 City Council Priorities Page 2 of 4
DISCUSSION
During the February 16 Council Priority Setting Session , Council received status updates on staff workplans related to the adopted priorities for FY 2023 . The Council provided staff with feedback on the workplans and on the updated priorities for FY 2024.
These updated priorities are shown in the table below and have been color -coded for ease of viewing. The Council member comments are included in the table in the rightmost column. Some comments were combined where they were similar to other Councilmembers’ comments. Some comments were edited for formatting and consistency. Additionally, the Council Priority that previously read as “Comprehensive Long-Term Land Use Planning ” was edited to “Long-term Land Use Planning and Housing.” This revised language may be more reflective of the feedback of Councilmembers from the February 16 meeting.
Strategic
Objectives Council Priorities Comments by Council Members Land Use
Long-Term Land
Use Planning and
Housing
• Approve and begin implementation of
the General Plan, Housing Element
and Objective Standards
• Comprehensive Bike/Ped Safety Plan
• Hamilton Avenue Precise Plan
• Develop objective standards for
residential single-family
neighborhoods
• Address homelessness
• Consider tenant rights such as rent
control
• Park deficiencies: Meet the needs of
residents
Measure O • Next steps for Measure O,
approving bids and specs, going
to bid, start construction
• Continue to support Oversight
Committee
• Would like to see some money
for ADA improvements at City
Hall
Financial Health
Financial Stability • Be strategic about seeking funding from other public agencies
• Make sure we have enough resources
to support housing programs
14 Packet Pg. 151
Adoption of Fiscal Year 2024 City Council Priorities Page 3 of 4 Strategic
Objectives Council Priorities Comments by Council Members • Support software and technology for
organizational and community
resiliency (HRIS, Permitting, etc.)
• Support development of short-term
and long-term Economic Development
Plan
• Consider ARPA funding allocations
• Support periodic and routine financial
reporting
• Review unfunded pension liability
• Support asset valuation study and
assessment of maintenance costs
• Explore potential revenue sources
• Look strategically for funding to
implement Housing Element
• Continue to pursue grant funding
opportunities
• Support personnel recruiting efforts
Environment
Sustainability • Support development of Climate
Action Plan
• SB 1383 implementation, equity for all
housing types
• Support resiliency of City facilities
Community
Community Health
and Safety
• Support traffic calming program
• Support small businesses
• Promote mental health through first
responders and partnerships
• Promote 988 program
• Inclusivity: Consider language or sign
language translation
• Support Gun Safety public information
campaign
• Promote Council and City initiatives:
Promote what we do
• Consider Governance policies
• Boards and Commissions structure
• Support crossing guard program:
Look to school districts for cost
sharing
• Support Emergency Management
14 Packet Pg. 152
Adoption of Fiscal Year 2024 City Council Priorities Page 4 of 4 Strategic
Objectives Council Priorities Comments by Council Members development and training
FISCAL IMPACT
There are no fiscal im pacts associated with adoption of City Council priorities. Any fiscal impacts of future workplans will be evaluated along with the development of the Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for Fiscal Year 2024.
Prepared by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Reviewed by:
Angelique Gaeta, Assistant City
Manager
14 Packet Pg. 153
City
Council
Report
TITLE: Council Committee Reports
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council report on activities from their committee assignments.
DISCUSSION
This is the section of the City Council Agenda that allows the City Councilmembers to report on items of interest and the work of City Council Subcommittees.
MAYOR BYBEE
Cities Association of Santa Clara County:
Board Representative
Legislative Action Committee and City Selection Committee City Attorney Performance/Compensation Subcommittee
City Clerk Performance/Compensation Subcommittee
City Manager Performance/Compensation Subcommittee
Finance Subcommittee
Friends of the Heritage Theater Liaison
Legislative Subcommittee
Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority Board (SVACA)
West Valley Mayors and Managers
VICE MAYOR LANDRY
Advisory Commissioner Appointment Interview Subcommittee City Attorney Performance/Compensation Subcommittee
City Clerk Performance/Compensation Subcommittee
City Manager Performance/Compensation Subcommittee
Education Subcommittee
Economic Development Subcommittee
Santa Clara Valley Water District County Water Commission Santa Clara County Library District JPA Board of Directors
West Valley Clean Water JPA (Alt.)
West Valley Solid Waste Authority JPA (Alt.)
West Valley Mayors and Managers (Alt.)
Item: 15
Category: COUNCIL COMMITTEE
REPORTS
Meeting Date: March 21, 2023
15 Packet Pg. 154
Council Committee Reports Page 2 of 3
COUNCILMEMBER FURTADO
Advisory Commissioner Appointment Interview Committee
DCBA Liaison
Silicon Valley Regional Interoperability Authority (SVRIA) West Valley Clean Water JPA
West Valley Sanitation District
West Valley Solid Waste Authority JPA
Association of Bay Area Governments (Alt.)
Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority Board (SVACA) (Alt.) Valley Transportation Authority Policy Advisory Committee (Alt.)
COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ:
Association of Bay Area Governments
Bay Area Quality Management District Board of Directors** Economic Development Subcommittee
Finance Subcommittee
League of Cities Peninsula Division Executive Committee** Legislative Subcommittee
Santa Clara County Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee Silicon Valley Clean Energy Finance and Audit Committee Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors**
Campbell Historical Museum & Ainsley House Foundation Liaison (Alt.) Cities Association of Santa Clara County:
Board Representative (Alt.)
Legislative Action Committee and City Selection Committee (Alt.) Friends of the Heritage Theater Liaison (Alt.)
Santa Clara Valley Water District: County Water Commission (Alt.) Silicon Valley Clean Energy JPA Board of Directors (Alt.) West Valley Sanitation District (Alt.)
COUNCILMEMBER SCOZZOLA
Campbell Historical Museum & Ainsley House Foundation Liaison Education Subcommittee
Silicon Valley Clean Energy JPA Board of Directors
Valley Transportation Authority Policy Advisory Board
DCBA Liaison (Alt.)
Santa Clara County Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee (Alt.) Santa Clara County Library District JPA Board of Directors (Alt.)
**appointed by other agencies
15 Packet Pg. 155
Council Committee Reports Page 3 of 3
Prepared by:
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk
15 Packet Pg. 156
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Date: March 20, 2023
From: Andrea Sanders, Deputy City Clerk
Via: Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Subject: Desk Item 9 – Correspondence
The attached correspondence was sent by Dave Jordan regarding Item 9 – Appeal of Planning Commission approval for a Variance for property located at 68 Page Street.
City of Campbell
MEMORANDUM
City Clerk’s Office
1 Daniel Fama
From: Dave Jordan
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 11:42 AM
To: Daniel Fama; Rob Eastwood
Subject: Re: 68 Page St. Variance Update (5)
Attachments: Elevations Sheet A4.docx
Daniel,
Re: PLN-2022-101 Yanjun Wang property 68 Page Street. Construction of an approximately 1,053 square- foot one-story single-family dwelling, inclusive of a 313 square-foot junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU), with a 529 square-foot attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU), with substandard front- and street-side setbacks (14 ½-ft and 3-ft respectively), including retention of an existing detached non-conforming garage.
Thank you for your responses, consideration and cooperation. Please review below for issues that I see with PLN-2022-101.
Under SB 9, local government officials may deny a development application if they find that the proposed project would have a “specific, adverse impact” on the physical environment” and there are no feasible and satisfactory mitigation options.
The plan below of a 28 foot lot with three buildings, eight exterior doors, each with porch light will have a “specific, adverse impact” on the physical environment”. (See attached Elevations Sheet A4)
Construction activity exceeded the scope of the issued permit and resulted in the demolition of existing walls and roofing, such that the project no longer constituted a remodel. As a result, the project was re- classified a new single-family home, consistent with Campbell’s Municipal Code.
SB 9 housing law
A proposed project under this new law cannot result in the demolition or alteration of affordable or rent- controlled housing or market-rate housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the past three years. 2 Will local rules about maximum square footage, building height and parking apply? Proposals under this new law must adhere to objective zoning and design review standards established by local cities and counties. Developments must still follow local zoning rules such as those governing height and yard size requirements.
Architectural Plans from 168CAD
PENG GAO Chief Executive Officer 135 S State College Suite 200 Brea, CA 92821 . Brea is part of the Los Angeles metropolitan area.
168CAD ARCH is a California Stock Corporation - Ca - General filed on January 19, 2021. The company's filing status is listed as Active and its File Number is 4688851.
The Registered Agent on file for this company is Peng Gao and is located at 135 S State College Suite, Brea, CA 92821. The company's principal address is 135 S State College Suite 200, Brea, CA 92821 and its mailing address is 135 S State College Suite 200, Brea, CA 92821.
The company has 1 contact on record. The contact is Peng Gao from Brea CA.
As a general rule, R1 zoning is intended for single-family residential properties. R1 zoning is typically a low-density land zone that allows for one residential unit and, in some cases, an accessory dwelling unit.
PROJECT DATA
Zoning Designation: R-1-6 (Single-Family Residential)
Net Lot Area: 3,415 square-feet 6,000 square-feet (Min. Required) 1
1 That the property does not satisfy the minimum lot size, and therefore, results in an exceedance to the maximum density is not considered a "non-conforming" condition that would preclude creation of a primary dwelling, ADU, and JADU.
Because the lot is smaller, the normal max density per acre does not apply?
3 Density: 6.01 units/gr. acre1 6 units/gr. acre. (Max. Allowed)
Setbacks: Proposed Required (Absent Variance) Front (west): 14 ½ feet 20 feet Street-Side (north): 3 feet 12 feet Garage (north): 4 feet (existing) 25 feet
Government Code § 65906.
The following staff analysis identifies each of the applicable findings in italics and how the proposed project satisfies them.
1. The strict or literal interpretations and enforcement of the specified regulation(s) would result in a practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Zoning Code. Strict application of the setback requirements would physically preclude reasonable development of the property.
There is insufficient area to allow for functional interior space necessary for a single-family dwelling to be constructed.
2. The strict or literal interpretations and enforcement of the specified regulation(s) would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties classified in the same zoning district.
The same zoning district, but it has an anomalous lot. This was an auxiliary building next to a proper lot.
Yes. Without relief to the aforementioned setback standards, the property owner would be unable to gain reasonable use of the property for a single-dwelling, ADU, and JADU as permitted by State law in all single- family residential zoning districts.
This property was sub-standard from 1907. Let’s correct a non-conforming blight.
4. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zoning district; and As noted, this property presents unusual site constraints (usually narrow and small) not commonly found within the R-1-6 Zoning District. The proposed setback reductions are the minimal necessary to allow reasonable use of the property. Moreover, the overall development intensity of the project, as measured by floor area ratio (FAR) and Lot Coverage is 4 consistent with what otherwise would be allowed by the R-1-6 Zoning District, such that the proposed structure is proportional to its area.
This is definitely “special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zoning district”.
A variance shall not be granted for a parcel of property which authorizes a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the parcel of property. The provisions of this section shall not apply to conditional use permits.
A 28 foot lot with three buildings, eight exterior doors, each with porch light.
5. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Yes. The addition of new residents to the neighborhood does not impair the public health or safety. Additionally, the project site is located within one- half mile of the Downtown Campbell Light Rail station, where the City cannot enforce any minimum parking requirements under AB-2097.
This plan is absolutely materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Evidenced by Public Comment.
RESOLUTION NO. 466x
6. The Project Site, in comparison to the development standards of the R-1-6 (Single Family Residential is unusually narrow.
7. The configuration of proposed structure does not constitute a "lodging house" or "rooming and boarding house" in that the structure has three distinct dwelling types: a primary dwelling, a junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU), and accessory dwelling unit (ADU), each with separate kitchen and bathroom facilities.
5 Sounds and looks exactly like a “lodging house" or "rooming and boarding house".
10. The setback reduction is the minimum necessary deviation from the applicable development standards necessary for the property owner to enjoy use of the property in the same manner as owners of other properties classified in the same zoning district.
The property owner did not purchase a comparable lot/building as owners of other properties classified in the same zoning district. This has a Setback reduction and substandard lot.
11. Allowing a setback reduction commensurate with the substandard lot width recognizes that this unusual parcel condition does not generally apply to comparably zoned properties.
Exactly.
13. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the Conditions of Approval and the impacts of the project.
Proportionality is not reasonable. Conditions are easy, impact deleterious.
Thank you,
Dave and Coleen Jordan
6 On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 09:15:26 AM PDT, Daniel Fama <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Dave – Here is the City’s staff directory and the Planning Commission’s 2/14/2023 hearing packet that provides the legal basis for the decision. If you would like discuss the project, please feel free to schedule a meeting with me using the link in my signature.
Daniel Fama
Senior Planner
City of Campbell | Community Development Department
(408) 866-2193 (call or text)
Book a Virtual/In-Person Appointment with me here
Apply for Planning and Building Permits here.
From: Dave Jordan <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2023 8:41 AM
To: Daniel Fama <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 68 Page St. Variance Update (5)
Daniel,
I am grieved to see that the Planning Commission has approved the despicable, unacceptable sub‐standard variance for 68 Page St.
I believe the focus should now be shifted to what may be a bigger problem: The Planning Commission.
Please explain why the variance was approved.
7 How can the approval be immediately circumvented?
Please provide names and contact info of your supervisor, your supervisor's supervisor and the Code Enforcement Division Lead.
This is a non‐conforming nuisance, and portends serious issues with zoning, housing code, and parking.
Thank you,
Dave Jordan
On Wednesday, March 1, 2023 at 11:34:05 AM PST, Daniel Fama <[email protected]> wrote:
Good Morning – The Planning Commission’s decision on the Variance has been appealed. The City Council will consider the appeal at its March 21st meeting. All of your previous correspondence will be included in the agenda materials. However, if you have additional comments, you may email them to me. The agenda packet will be published by end-of-day March 16th at: https://www.campbellca.gov/AgendaCenter/City-Council-10
Thank you
Daniel Fama
Senior Planner
City of Campbell | Community Development Department
(408) 866-2193 (call or text)
Book a Virtual/In-Person Appointment with a Planner here.
Apply for Planning and Building Permits here.