Campbell City Council
June 2, 2026

Created: 2024- 10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST]
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 138 of 280
B. Facilities in public rights - of -way which are regulated by Title 11 Streets and Sidewalks of the Campbell Municipal Code.

C. Public safety communications facilities owned and operated by the City, County, State, or Federal Government.

D. Facilities owned and operated by the City for its use.

E. Over -the -air reception devices (" OTARDs") as defined in 47 Code of Federal Regulations ( C. F. R.) Section 1. 4000 et seq., as may be amended or superseded, which include without limitation, direct - to -home satellite antennas smaller than three feet in diameter.

F. All antennas and wireless communications facilities identified by the FCC or the California Public Utilities Commission ( CPUC) as exempt from local regulations.

Ord. No. 2226, § S( Exh. A- 1), 9- 19- 2017)

21. 34. 035 Prohlb ted facilities.

Oywrireless communications facilitythatITdoe notmc® rnp_I,y with them°mmgst c°u°rrgp ve Mate . and operational standards and„ re trfatjgns LincludLin bL' t°ggt°°Irra rted ta, mRF emission stand rdsj do ted by the FCC its„ prahi iced.

21. 34. 040 Permits required.

Thpp ur ese t.._is ...
i,_. s. o.oest bfi clear_...___ R,,f .._ Section is to esta Irs a ° rk for communications errnittrn r rn°ewor or ca...,.° n.,
facilities0verned by this Chapterw
Aw,, y ° r ess, Cammunications Facility P rrnits. A wireless Communications Facility Perrr` i _ asw rovided f„or by thisgSecti n subject tothe City s prior review, arid a rgy!.. in accordance with the roced ures in this q,_..°_—._..._ _. .°__ y .w.. Cha rntain ter is re aired rior to conductrn an work to canstruc create ° nlargeerect, install. mam, modify or palace a wireless communications facility sub tect tg this°Chat V1. 1 Tier 2 WirelessCommunicationsFacility PentATier2 Wireless Communications FacilityPrrriit°is rewired for:

All new
freestanding facilities. 2. Tier
W1 Wireless Communications Facility Permit. ATier I Wireless Communications Fac1lrty°,P1eWrmit isrequired° far Ti.

All
new or modified faci ities new re, es t„andiin :wireless facilities.._ 3ww w_ Ministerial ° Wireless Communication Fac, i,fity Permitd Miwrristeria° I. Wireless Communications Facility Permit isreuired for:. i. Any
eligible fiacilities,° re uest s defined m S,ectiown 2134.220 ,Defin° itions.), rovided it satisfies all olicable eli ibilit criteria. Supp. No.
40, 9/ 24) Created: 2024-
10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST] Page 2
of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 139 of 280
BQ Other
Ch he |
e d"eral state or loca Government agencies which includes without limitation an ntkor normits anclZor tural Review Permits and Site and
Architectural Review Permits, pyrsVARt,, jq_Chppter 21. 42 of the Code,,_shall not be,.r@_quired for facilities A per'
issued under this Chintpr-a does not create avested right tooccupy any particular location, and apermittee may be required to move, relocate and remove facilities atits expense consistent with other provisions of the (gdgCA9--- and applicable law. CD. discretion. |
nany instance where a scommunications facility
requires under this the
Directore- efr, FR4R4y,
4eve4opp+en-t-dk ec4or shall have the discretion to refer the lication to the Created: 2024- 1v' ms.,2.voron Page sofs7
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 140 of 280
A. Tier 2 Wireless Communications FaciIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11t Permits. The Planninu Commission shall review and conditiona Tier 1 Wireless Communications Facility Permits. The Community con. i.j.i..o.p
a r y2a.!.ications for Tier 1 Wireless Communications Facility Permits in accordance with the rocedures set forth ii
C. Ministerial Wireless Communications Facill Permits. The Communit Devglo compliance with theprocedures set forth in Section 213± 110LMinisterial Wireless Communications± cii a 11y Permit deci

21. 34. 060
tj_tji_ ppEove a Tier 1 or Tier 2 Wireless Communications Facilities Permi ji.ons facili l, as conditioned is consistent With the mywgm. 21 the Code and General Plan,
location availabl- - ursuant to the Code and the Cjjy§ ards the Wireless Fari ity 2gsian Iternatives are either
Ie
C. The applicant submitted all I applicable and correct information documentation fees and deposits and D. The Ci ' s decision is not in conflict with or reern t State or fe& 4 law including iny -- its on local O,qthoritv and prohiblited Rarounds for denial. if the a . licant r ------ limited exc otion from standards as set fo Section 21. 34. e ust also be made:
j.__jhg_ppp! ica t has demonstrated that the x e s is rjarrjo tailored to the minimum I HIM-__ ALro nds for denial.,
Notwithstandin any other orovisions of this Chilaoter the denial of a Wireiess Communications Firi itv Permit may not be based on the environmental effects of RF em ssions for wireless communications facilities to the extent that the ao licant has demonstrated that its ro osed wireless facil t i com V wit FCC re

21. 34. 075 Permit term Ilimits.

The purpose of this section is to establish clear and consistent rulles CroverninR- the duration and on of permits for wir6ess communications facilities. includin2a the amortization of existin- facifties that lack a snecified Created: 2024- 10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST)
Page « of3/
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 141 of 280

MAMMOTYA
r_A% IMjTnjMrjMff Mt
1 ears from the
202 Z22ZL —Or
b. Ten ears from the date of their ermit vest

21. 34. 0850Application procedures. Anapplication
for aWwire| esCeommunicadons FfacUity haUbefi| edand reviewed in compliance with CA4&Chapter 21. 38 (Application Filing, Processing and Fees), as may be amended from dmeto-time, unless otherwise specified inthis Supp. No. 449/ 24) Created: 2024'
10- 2913. 32. 08 (EST] Page sofs7
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 142 of 280

IMMUMUMM
Q! on with the Wireless Communications Facili y_ er i gpp_(i ation. Failure to submit a re_qy,ired,,,building, pp.MiL_ nq_y result in the Wireless Communications Facility Eermit application being deemed incoolete as determ C.

Revised applications. Unless waived by the resubmitted
applications that result in a substantially revised facility design, size, height, or location such that a new orsubstantially different project, warranting anew round of completeness review, is proposed, shall be required to be withdrawn and a new application shall befiled for the substantially revised project. Timeline forreview. The
thneframe for review of an application shall begin to run when the application is submitted in writing to the CaommunityQdeve> npmentDdepartment but may betolled by mutual agreement or in cases where the City determines that the application isincomplete. The application processing time for applications subject to this shall be in conformance with the time periods and procedures established by applicable FCC decisionsor rules, adjusted for any tolling due to incomplete application notices ormutually agreed upon extensions oftime`+ Incomplete application notices. In the
event that City staff determines thata permit application does not contain allthe required materials, d_mayissue an incomplete notice
consistent with this subsection. When applications are incomplete as filed, the timeframes for review set forth in Section 1ejew} abovedo not include the time that the applicant takes to respond to the City' s request for additional information. First notice. haUdetennine whether an
application for a
facility is complete within thirty_ L30 calendar days ofthe City' sreceipt ofthe appUcat) on and shall notify the applicant in writing when additional information isrequired tocomplete the application. The incomplete notice shall specify the incomplete or missing information and the publicly available information source that requires that missing orincomplete information. The applicable timeframe for review set forth inSection shall be reset oUed for all othftL Mlications under
this until the applicant makes asupplemental submission, responding tothe [ ity's request for additional
information. The timeframe for review begins running again when the applicant makes asupplemental submission in response to the City s notice of Sucp. No. z0, 9/24) Created: 2024- 10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST)

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 143 of 280
incompleteness„ enerall and with res ect to a lications involvin[ s smalU ceBl facilities, shall be reset pursuant to aMricable law1.

2. One suubmittalSu it . The applicant' s response and submission of supplemental materials and information, responding to a notice of incompleteness must be given to the City in one submittal packetww ich shall be submitted exclusive) through the City..... esignated online ermitplatform. An, alternative submittal method ma be used onU if the City ana er or their desi nee first determines., in writinL that a demonstrated technical or acces"! Jbilitv issue unintenti, 1 revents use of the i,
tys dgsJgnateLd_ gn.!Jnep prrriit w@. tform. Resubm tals shall onl, be„ pcc ted orb .days r d durir ghours when City offices are open to the public for regular business. 3.

Subsequent notice(s). After an applicant responds to an incomplete notice and submits additional information, City staff will notify the applicant within ten 10I calendar days of the City' sreceipt ofthe supplemental submission ifthe additional information failed to complete the application. In the case of second or subsequent notices of incompleteness, the applicable timeframe for review set forth in Section 21.34 0-580.D.(Timeline for review)_ shall be tolled until the applicant makes a supplemental The
submission,
City may continue to
responding
issue notices
to
of
the
incompleteness
City'
until
s request for
the
additional information.
applicant supplies
4—
all requested information
required todeem the application as complete. Following each notice of incompleteness, the applicable timeframe forreview set forth in Section 21.34. 0-580.D.(Timeline for review)(-a}shall be tolled during time that the applicant takes to respond to the City' s request for additional information.

Withdrawal; !
1xteqsionsEA- ensieps of time. To promote efficient review and timely decisions, applications deemed incomplete must be resubmitted within one hundred eighty 180 calendar days after notification of incompleteness, or they shall be deemed automatically withdrawn. l iag '-_ , t;.._ - e i& y-- el - di - ay.. , ma.- e•- ti e exte _. in - free sing- e- te- r ubFA4.- 44et- te- eeed- d d ilty.. caleadar- days- -. If the application is deemed automatically withdrawn-{ice-en-applicable- exteosie- fteriod; 4-graRt ed;4"a4 pined), a new application ( including, fees, plans, exhibits, and other materials) shall be required in order to commence processing ofthe project. Ord.

No. 2226, § 5( Exh. A- 1), 9- 19- 2017; Ord. No. 2293, § 1( Exh. B), 5- 2- 2023) 21.

34. 0960 Submittal requirements. For
all wireless communications facilities, the applicant shall provide the information listed below. Application fora wireless communications facility shall be made upon aform to be provided by and shall be submitted to the Communi Develo ment De artment throu h the Cit 's des,, i nated online ermit L tfo, rmdeaeetd p The form shall specify the number, size, and format ofthe project plans and application materials tobe provided. The Community Development Directorpe n+uT* devei en- t,4iFec- toFmay waive or defer certain submittal requirements fequ+re ifiaprej tefs. Unless an exemption, waiver, ..ar deferral - or aiv applies, all applications shall include all of thefollowinga eacc if• a it€ ad• tefialwis• issiaa cet# ul$y- feted: A.

Application. Afully completed and executed City application form for the type of approval sought and all information, materials, and fees specified insuch City application form), available on the City' s website or from the Communit Develi'' 1011ent De artment _ y-_devefe efrt aftrnent, as may be amended from time to time. Sapp.

No. 40, 9/ 24) Created:
2024- 10-29 13: 32: 08 [ E5T] Page
7 of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 144 of 280
B. Application fees . ....,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,, and de 2si,ts, Application fees, and de osits when ap,plicable es set forth in the City' s Master Fees Schedule or_ its successor or by grolutipn adopted by the. w,City Courocil in a payment format accepted by the City Finance i7e aartment€+sa eeeftt I as maybe amended from time to time.- Exce tion: if the ado ted fee exceeds the maximuirn ermitted b a livable law the City shall hest fee allowed..

C. q„ild,in _ perm t. lfITs_perrnit_ pplication c?yernemd mby jbis.Ch, apter reutr s a „buildin W.._„permit t e cp_ rr candsrr buildin , p g rj2 kt_ppplication must be Submitted in accordance With Sections 21.3,.080 lAr lication procedures. D. Written
statement; type of a . The p pficat onmmsh11i„n„clude adetailed written narrative that clearly and
p
concisely-. Identifies2. Discloses i1py,
iQbl,e,1s. hot clock or statutor Ltlmeframe for review and decision under federal or stealth cle n + ,

5. Provides a
description of the targeted service area s gcifyin A elinear distance in feet,jg&, r ddSection

21. 34. 180 ffrom standard' c
e_ ++ permit should be A.ritter+-e#
e eseKi ia- j e ia- veil-+ 6u i°a-r fa. ry. of- fae+li +a 4 rum h es+ s. •€ i+ y;--e l4o xi;. . I.. .. , t,iiagat rf .. i
W - oac- h- fe: g. do... #, ' ik3&e-•# e+ Bity P.. w i•:. ` , istKati - ° - ° et-€ are. ev+ it ter- +Fa e: f ea be 4 t tita n ela ibie fib e r + st ire a, aided a
t° - c4a- thas- det i a4ee E. Preliminary title
report. Apreliminary title report ( or other definitive evidence of property ownership satisfactory to the City) prepared in the last six- C61 months. F. City -owned.

If the proposed facility is to be located on a City -owned building, pole, or other structure, the application must be signed by the City or their designee th eseptat° -4-theinn- and accompanied by the license or other agreement authorizing applicant' suse of such City - owned property. A permit issued under this Chanter is not a franchise, license or other authorization to occupy the public rights -of -way, or a license, lease or agreement authorizing occupancy ofany public property. G. Independent consultant
deposit. Afee deposit, if required, to reimburse the City forits costs to retain an independent consultant to review the technical aspects of the application. H. Site and construction plans. Complete and accurate plans, drawn to scale, signed, and sealed by a California - licensed engineer, land surveyor, and/ or architect, which include, at a minimum, the following items. Supp.

No. 40,
9/24) Created: 2024- 10-
29 13: 32: 08 [ EST] Page 8 of
37 Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 145 of 280

1. A site plan and elevation drawings for the facility as existing and as proposed with all height and width measurements explicitly stated.

2. A depiction, with height and width measurements explicitly stated, of all existing and proposed transmission equipment.

3. A depiction of all existing and proposed utility runs and points of contact.

4. A depiction of the leased or licensed area of the site with all rights -of -way and easements for access and utilities labeled in plan view and including legal boundaries of the leased, licensed or owned area surrounding the proposed facility and any associated access or utility easements.

5. For proposed collocations or modifications to towers, the plans must include scaled plan views and all four elevations that depict the physical dimensions of the wireless tower as it existed on February 22, 2012, or as approved if constructed after February 22, 2012. For proposed collocations or modifications to base stations, the plans must include scaled plan views and all four elevations that depict the physical dimensions of the base station as it existed on February 22, 2012, or as approved if constructed after February 22, 2012.

6. A demolition plan ( if applicable).

I. Visual simulations. A visual analysis that includes
visual simulations that show unobstructed before - and - after construction daytime and clear -weather views from the four most prominent angles, together with a full -color map that shows the location of each view angle;

2... _._............. . A color and finished material palette for proposed materials juxtaposed against the existing material it seeks to match ( if applicable);

3. 4 -aft photograph of a completed facility of a similar design and setting as the proposed wireless communications facility ( if applicable); and
simulation,._ .... P_ mi.._.- _ lulling sitgklan end- elgv t® n drawings, A visual an sca e ro ect fins _incmudi showing the maximum expansion of the facility which could occur as a result of a future eligible facility request pursuant to Section 6409( a) and FCC rules implementing Section 6409 of the Spectrum Act, codified at 47 U. S. C. 1455.

J. Prior permits. True and correct copies of all previously issued permits, including, without limitation, all required conditions of approval. For eligible facilities requests, the application must also include a certification by the applicant that the proposal will not violate any previous permit or conditions of approval or why any violated permit or conditions does not prevent approval under Section 6409( a) and the FCC' s regulations implementing this federal law.

K. FCC compliance; aAffirmation of radio frequency standards compliance. An affirmation, under penalty of perjury, that the proposed installation will be FCC compliant and will not cause members of the general public to be exposed to RF levels that exceed the MPE levels deemed safe by the FCC.

The application shall include an RF c® rnpliance report ( or other documentation) acceptable to the City, Av k h swb,pen rqp red_ and certified by a, pLgLgssional„ electrical µengineer registered and licensed in the State of California, evidencing that the proposed facility, as well as any collocated facilities, and cumulative conditions will comply with applicable FCC RF human ex osure_standards and regulations, ( including, but not limited to, federal RF exposure standards and exposure limits).

Documentation of FCC compliance shall be required for all wireless communications facility permits, including, without limitation, permit modifications. Within 30md2s_ of site activation, the applicant shallsubmitan activation re Iicened rpfessonmergireeT, h re art shall certify that„ field measuredIT. radiofr cuncy emissionsw_, com ly with ihelevels stated _. in_mthe Supp. No. 40, 9/ 24) Created: 2024- 10- 29
13:32:08 [ EST] Page 9 of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 146 of 280
Electrum net Emner __ CqM ianc,e Report and confirrnthat all regulred warnwir7g suns ndmmother, rec,2,u,t,i,onar,, easures have been uroperly instilled.

L. Required Ikicenses or i0pprovals. Evidence that the applicant has all current licenses and registrations from the FCC, the CPUC, and any other applicable regulatory bodies where such license( s) or registration( s) are necessary to provide wireless communications services utilizing the proposed wireless communications facility.

M. Structural analysis. A structural analysis, prepared, signed, and sealed by a California -licensed engineer that assesses whether the proposed wireless communications facility complies with all applicable building codes.

Other permits. An application for a wireless facility shall include all permit applications with all required application materials for each and every separate permit required by the City including, but not limited to, a building permit and an encroachment permit ( if applicable). A permit issued under this is not in lieu of any other permit required under the except as specifically provided in this Lba2teLebiapleL Further, the applicant is hereby notified that all permit submittals are' at risk', and that application materials may be required to be modified, and if denied, shall not be reimbursed application fees.

O. Statement of Purpose. A written statement that includes:

1. A description of the technical objectives to be achieved; p n annotated topographical map that identifies the targeted service area to be benefitted;

3. The estimated number of potentially affected users in the targeted service area; and L # Full -color signal propagation maps with objective units of signal strength measurement that show the applicant' s current service coverage levels from all adjacent sites without the proposed site, predicted service coverage levels from all adjacent sites with the proposed site, and predicted service coverage levels from the proposed site without all adjacent sites.

P.
w,wmAternativesit, es_ gnae , y _ a rat must provide a list of all alternative , locations and su grt T , lice , sis. structures that are, more prefer red accordinfl to_the site location and support structure preferences set forth in Section w213,4120jAJnwd cif this, Chaptgr This list must include , reasona, blymavpilab{ealternatives locatedw within the ap canV5 rgeted service , erred that could,,,,,, pptentiall LLrneetthe, prplect' s_ covergfe ,
a
objectives, either individually crr,m ,comloinetionwwwith other, sites. For each„ alternative the Ilcant must provide: 1._____ A
general descript,,onof the site and the desi n considered1 2..._. A written„ explgnatvonfor wh,ythe site wasnotselectedsncludinj; whether it_yvas t(chnicelly infeasibleR unavailable, mor less consistent with thiswChapter them theproasdlocation and 3 A meanir} fulcarrrparative gnAlysis„ su prted y„technucalwGraformatGon gndwfactulustiflication. The_ gpplicgntrn y,group Rr ..Ij 1p.,.. out multiple alternatives based based onsharedcha„ rgcterisiics if suortedbycl( grand. gpnvin, cingtechnicglgustificationdempns„ rvalternatives would tr'wt_et watsl, lC not meet the in prC) lect's stated coverage C) bleCtlyes. Exception . Stealth facilities that comply fully,with this Chgpter` s re y,i-rernents and , which md,o not seek a Grrrrsted exception frgrrb astanda, rds aspprgvided for bySectionn134 180,lirnited exce t.igr frgrrti standards ire nqt. required to submit. an alternative sites analysls. F-; .. , e 've° s4 ys. is:-=. psea t- s&-ram ' e..a_ •-., c€- C.. e ' ... r ,. . Supp. No. 40, 9/ 24) Created: 2024- 10- 29

13.32:08 [ EST) Page 10 of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 147 of 280
ai n , ... ce eyed- ei' em epta ie ar' + ale,- 4e -+ et mee isterrt wit-ka- t-I: ae earning e - alysi nd.. c-- teckarai a" ' e arrc- eta c- asttfic ' ersare sa y te- -. ent -. 4ayr- alter° ' ve=-a e 4e + nfea • ie t ve a le eretmas_ e -tbe.. err t standai~ ds +r--tka h- ta we ese€ f.ecati .. ieg... ty4s- listed. w4y. tlae fic4,)
tk:m.4-& - exist' ir- eis F+ i s ' asfae4ityas+ evial3de ti &tka4Eflities, s f et- be-+eq, 4e4- te... ide.. an i s$ te maalys+ s:. Q.

Noise Sstudy. If the proposed facility (or any portion thereof or equipment thereon) will generate or omit noise, a noise study prepared and certified by an engineer for the proposed facility and all associated equipment including, but not limited to, all environmental control units, sump pumps, temporary backup power generators, and permanent backup power generators demonstrating compliance with the City' s noise regulations. The noise study must also include an analysis of the manufacturers' specifications for all noise - emitting equipment and a depiction of the proposed equipment relative to all adjacent property lines. R.

Other information, Such other information as the City may require, as specified in bJ! EaUy ubliriv available materials, including, but not limited to, information required as stated on the City' s website. S.

Construction Sstaging/ Pphasing elan, A construction staging/ phasing plan shall be provided indicating the location and duration of all associated construction activities. T.

Content € exemptions for Ministerial Wireless Communications Facility mP rrnits„- l' ' e m aci s t p , Notwithstanding subsections (A) through ( S) above, applications for MinisterW Wireless Communications Facility Permits„ exempt from the requirements insubsections (E), ( 1), ( 0), ( P), ( Q), and ( S) above. Ord.

No. 2226, § 5( Exh. A-1), 9- 19- 2017) 21.

34. 100070 General requirements; standard conditions of approval. In addition to any other conditions of approval permitted under federal and Sstate law and that the decision - making body deems appropriate, all wireless communications facilities whether approved through a_Wireless CoYie ePermit or elea deemed ire . granted e e a! evao- t; rnrnunicationF scilit by the operation of law, shall include and abide by the following conditions a plywhydefaultnmlessmrn® dified r yrived bythew licbie d cis(on rvikin of approval. These conditions shall body @s part of the rmit For n,qn mdisc eti®nary ®rwrnjriisteri, l rov lms, nluding R d by,_ I s rxthese c®wnd tiaris shill I n fill ur4lessyotherwis rpern The servicep ardLor tedwby Inc those deemed rants, A. p _ tqy, owner
w
shall remove all obsolete or unused hundredfacilities from the site of
one *
op
y
ro
nclarprope
s,
ty
whichever
owner
comes earlier. yLpf termination
or
ofcthe
lease with the B. .l +; 4val.
@[! OAy
p of a itshal be QyerrIg byJ__ _ 1hg_pr9visions ofS
Permit licenseBusiness , with a
co
wireless
h y obtain d maintain a
Citv business license. Supp. No. 40, 9/
24) Created: 2014- 10- 29
13: 32: 08 [ EST] Page 11 of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 148 of 280
on the site. For the pqrp is e ment utine maintenance activities shall not be considered to result in a ablact im pn measure p kiri& bp i cAt io n s fo rgl jgLb Igja LiI p_ qu,ests, shal Lbe exemp ti _[ this condition p[_qvided that any nin, itl fromLqduqion. onsite pces clogs, iolate apLiorj O!kif a gfgtLgLde 11JUM ,
All law.

The Communi y-De el pMent ® ppart ment shall collect costs on behalf of the,,. Cit G. Develaprment a d_®perplional standards. All facilities shall, satisfy theydeveloprnentwstarrdardsmmmefthe primaa (dLiqg. pf, ft,zonin district in which thp a epfoppsgd. As tyyg!!, As grequirements of Chapjer ferenc light and japtgr noise, r, vi ra inter 2- LqainteriarjcejALI.
q
2L15JSte -
ej_oprngfq Stg! IdAd- 5L_E?gpiqM. ev lo ent and operational standards shall lo' 1111111110 I Pnprmittp r: L.—AngliI jty gg!, Les
t LjhQ gjgLrLt Ire red byja i2. _Asut p_ querit coll. oc. a. tiolq fgci31iy_ jo teextent. Ee balit ia Qpvernment Code section S850- 6( 21 3. For a stealth faci, lity.
when such exception is limited to maximum allo ble heig jt,'. etjq g..minimum I ....... gtb 4cks, A h g? sti qdyL_ _ q would not result a_ pg[ ceivable vi ual im 4. For aconce Iedjgj& SamQqfIaf in tree, an exce tion Lthe ap cable heiRht and 9 qd,to resemble asetback standards shall be allowed solely.

Lor artific ql brpM, he§, jbgjr associated leaves or needle iln yanc las pp2rt p sg d xclqs jp,, yp ort those branches. Such elements ma encroach q_q111pl g,mimmum extent rigicessary L_[eplicat ap _L _And fullness of the hg!tree O&TL'rql 1h—is' q—Xce2t— i a. 2qt!-Dpt applI pEj qry rugy, E lqyp rt Li. t..t ! n Lower nySjther structural compgnqnts, includLn,&_ ide or seconclar pg[iIs.yppQq aq OnAs. aoLio_ eg!
ip Mgjt,,,or other functional elements ofthe wireless f WWWW" comp!gt(d prior o op
ilqI thef I onent of that facility). IN MOM Lto aLL ,thedimension bulk andscaL,,
qq! qr, and texture,. AnjL turg modifications to the facility must notmterialsdefeat concealment. Lyles and regulations. th app, rpygo, 2!
Ms onjiI
e with the Comm u nity.Devgl op enLDgpartment. Supp. No. 40, 9/24) Created: 2024- 10- 29 13: 32: 08 [
EST) Page 12 of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 149 of 280
elements of the facililyin emer e.n.cie.s.. o_r_when the facilityInIL atens imminent harm topgrs_Qn_ gr 212qertyL.

M. Contact information for. responsib, le.pgftg jbg p(Lr_Mittee shall at all times maintain accurate contact information for alLpgLjes L(Lsj2p! 2sible for the facijtyw ich shall include a. p gq_ uqtjjer,, tEggt Log address and email address for at least one natural p_grsojL6t!. sqch contact information forLp _pqps.ible pqjjjgs. al I be p( qMWed_jQ thg_ orn nity Direct o - S!', jnj L— _-pgyg!ppM nL__ r-qp- Al- qgg N. General maintenance, - rhe site an d_ the lit fagLy,_ qqlucling.§ ut not limited to. al,l landscapiLng,_ Lq[! in&,_A qceLs gutts, strLL concealryi ent featu re, _and related,gq! ipqjgq__t Mg be maintained i n a neat Lafge,,ArjO cd-e-a-n- _manner and in accordance Lthallpp p[ jqah,LejaAs., App qtppproval,

0. Graffiti removal. All Braff iti or other vandal ism on facilities must be removed at thg sole expgnse of the permittee within fortv-eight hours after notification from the Citv.

P. FCC finclu dingbu.,[!qtji m ited to, R-F,,Exposqej,gorppli _,! Jacilities must complyy.. gL(L,stanclards and re ulations of the FCC aq4jqyq g,L. State or fecleral. g9yeEn t agqrj y uthqrity o 0 Abandonment.,
UMM

2. After the un Develo ment Director declares a facilily omp I abandoned or discontinuedtg pgrm Lt t IMgl@n he date of ttge shall have six _ _ py fEgallhe date of t declarati jgLIqqger time as the mmu i develo ment director may o ritingA Lre a s on a b
Supp. No. 40, 9/ 24)
a . Reactivate the use of the abandoned or discon inued facili Jqr Q- _mp qrj.g.DLlbgEg9f) a roval - or
b. Remove the facilLty, jqLcqMponent of that fpcirityjq All im vements installed in connection with the facilitjjg.Lqp less acilitydirected otherwi se the bv fLA Commu Dgygj, gpRgjnt Director., and restore the site to a condition inj;-QLqp ia WAh_ Al! gppflgable codes and consistent with the then- existing. urrQqn ing, pfga, Created:
2024- 10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST] Page
13 of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 150 of 280
LAFArANtV3IK* WMTa4" i min
L,_..j fte ermittee fails t _qoTp jEovisions of this Section 21. 34. 100. e& iAt ct to treat the. facilitv as a nuisance to be abated a§ provided in the Code IucliD&_ ut noLlirr Lited o Ch te
pLqRg,rty_ypQR, which the wireless facil is insta jq is to be installIledl e shall defend iWith counsel Le—asqfL§ Y-, Fi! LsfAqtmjq. L t_ ybj n dem n i armless th_t"i of Camp! 2! tL2 direc tqfrs'- a §, R-R - L(p rqsggtati\ . n ( LMp( qyfL= ITM _ _nq pga,inst:

LIcLp. MaRe§. ia bilit, n s,,.! osses.,. qgst. pqd qs9 r Lrq. An roceedin
i
ts,,
tanjAnd iyits of mandamus and other act,ons oi §jr
qghj, agai st the Cit or its off cers of als dire or aRtnts, epEqst! jtaLtior ct s, L em oy p-LLes Lttack, to fici seek to modifyAet aiLe _y!jid or annul the Ci 's
a EqyLL o an mit Pp _ the
course of the defense., Wif"
I 11 a inIn vim Facilities,
qg IL§ball cp,!I!p n a Llassociateclp rpl!Ls,hall( rj!ucl th lo ard permit.

F*
t.ermextensi.jheCi jEapt. AnLby eration of law of a Ministerial Wireless Communications cilijy, Permit. for an elig be faces reguest constitutes afeclerally- TanqA e Q to modification the und rlyi pe-p mit. or,a bT_ owg[ a_ rip, _ ovalfor the su _qL se station. Th grs . 2r,&ppt by_qperation oflaw of a Ministerial Wireless Communications Fality Permit for an t( gib efgces guest will not extend....the ermit term for any. p njt,.approvalg.( triL _ and its term shall be coterminous with the underlyi g,ppL !_p _tgnjtq he I tqry 9 _19L TLy jtc _I or la,;.se st,;tion. Supp,
No. 40, 9/ 24) Created:
2024- 10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST] Page
14 of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 151 of 280
be iRc4u4e- din- all
a-ROOf
The
Supp. No. 40, 9/ 24)
Created: 2024- 10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST]

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 152 of 280
ide t°+- e a ' E a_ i e.. l ' ° s•, I la.. ' Ea di ' _ ek. - + bua iRf;-Gr- } ;
ties adi ° cas m E3 s a el i of , , . d ¢ y s s w 1 .. e - unityelop ae H- t
e wck. iifi. rA411tisfy- tfiede velopm ew, a+ ds. 4 the i+•++ fir- f ; as-+ a a i- ids- o-Edi e i :6 perf
pitted # - - el b _ 64t esf49. td f equif twee -
men u* ed.. dy€ ' iity en mush fi,. .
saiiice le° a 1i•
its- aired. . + y ted-+ f saae ats; i4 e e
e . fie-- e ie r-e i4ii-¢ _ ° da-€ Ei• ii e
a l+ e t e ast- st i l a d e eailtis- eEaside edm-eles es e€ eE ice e 41- e ... s ali... et, •-€eder d;•A • a
s; Supp.

No. 40, 9/ 24) Created:
2024- 10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST] Page
16 of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 153 of 280
fegulate - 5uc-h,
Supp. No. 40, 9/ 24)
Created; 2024- 10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST]

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 154 of 280
gFaf+t,aF
fa6fitie- s+ " uerAiw4t+ tet,exA-eRdt4&pefmit.-ter4 n, fef,-any,,A4sepeFfn4t.,-a4fffinis4ati-,-- and.-aFc-hitec-.tw al-fe-vi-- w ap-pF,.wed;-.-A4, c-est-s- as-,ec4at-c4, wi-V4 the-+eview--pi qc-e&s- s-h-a4 4e49f4e- by-the- sepAee, pfGvideF, fFn- 4t-ee-and/9-r- fequestOrd.

No. 2226, § 5( Exh. A-1), 9- 19- 2017) 21.

34.110 Ministerial Wireless g9muq: igtjp acilLh! P r ocgss. of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012. A' Review p oc (L. yLTheq conduct Communit D IL Lop thqia cle iggge ha L e ministerial review of the ap _pliqation to confirm comp An th 1, b ovisions of this qh, qj2tgr, apRrqy!d,gqncLitions_ 2f appEgvgl,_g_qd.... rel.e,v.a.nt_.State an,d_federa.1 law. No pq lic hearin shall B. _Appr p. 1 iq: Th o nit -. Dey- gl- o-p-!ng-n—t,,2rLe-cig- r,.- gr- ngeshall p o Lean p.pp! ication for a Ministerial Wireless Communications Facility Permit when the uest meets all of folloM inre Lflremen ts. 1,,—Ihgpro.
pg eo,,fqLility, 29. not involve or E@_q.qjE neW_ jLqrgtLi( Lna( yrqy 4 i.And ,._:jhg_pLop se jq!;t qmpLiqs With all ap liga. IezgQ inRL iLio gjgn ts qgglg_ _( and condition pqqiremen Supp.

No.
40, 9/ 24) Created: 2024-
10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST] Page 18
of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 155 of 280
C. Additional aparc yal,g[, La_ f ib,Aijg !gests.,, facility [ ity _Tgy_ ppjications E g( submitted underSection K4QTjaj_ qf,jhe Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act o d the Director shall.a ditionally. f _determine that: 1fin
bues s e..L,, FCC L a- icjb,! eLqde[ al law and1pi—qLariLiesa pEli beFaciitiesRe ei ki — atJ — on- -s., IaprLoposed modification does not defeat
or materialjy _;g_Mpm iseexistin concealment elements or stealth des12- n features of the facilit orly2p2rt structure; rem i°ns with all app ijc L _ kb! and t.KC RF standards- 4.--. Lh—e,pLoggsec RQ.

Lificati_ on d-gs. not constitute a "substantial change " tqbe. pbysical dimensions of the existiqpyyt[ g[ qK, tower or base station0 — qsAf fqELd..b Section 21.34. De n 2 tions. of this Code or applicable federal law. D. Denial criteria. The Commuwnity Develapment D
ector ot gir design,ge..Inspy inisterial mmmmmm . Wireless Communications Facil E2E jt Permit if
the 1. ( not sin substantial conformance with
the... a _pLoy_ q_q_p[qns, conditions of RE 1,_ aL a j ilndz Le - d—fg or materaI gL@dpsj onconic elements orsteaIth d
sign exlis fatycjilj! or2--Viol, a— tes ap-p!i!-a
b,. 1'—eb gi—ldinL stru ura , electr ca fe es.p _rle24jjj. gnfqrqegkle pgr.M. it conditions,,. or L._Ysq[Atgs pic health 2Lsafgty
standards enforceable under a p ic p- E. Additional denial criteria for fp,!;eliy,, L11LE fflty gg!ts. EAp _qg _plications submitted under Section Middle4Qqj@j of theClass Tax Relief and Job Creation Agt_qf 201.2 hg,pirector. mayAl5q_ eny he EtUest: ' ifI.. pMqsedja_ qilJtLfails to meet the criteria for
an Elijgiblg FaqLir igs Lt _g_quest under federal law andrFCC 2. The mod.ific.ati. on constitutes a "
substa tiIchan e" to the j1hysical dimensions of the existinE wireless tower or base st IlLias defi ned, Jpy iQr!21. 4.2201qefinitions. oft iLCode or F. Denial without pre udice. Any __Oer qj of_ Ministerial Wireless Communications Facilily Permit shall 11 iii; [11, If11 WAAM", Supp. No. 40, 9/ 24) Created: 2024- 1e29
13: 32: 08 [ EST] Page
19 of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 156 of 280
A.-......_. d s s sae ee4evek4+me-Rt- 4fec49f
fac-4it4es.-feq,HerA.wheR-.tht- 4ifee-t-gf -finds
j----- T4,e-,a-p-pkafft has PFePG-,e4-+4+94WIGaIjG-RaWk abl,e- lx44ngr- st+ u-c4u4; 3, - 44,ate-s--aRy- - pef
MEMEEM=
Ret- qu44y fGf- ma-ri4atofy- apWavat ++A4ef
WithOUt--Pfe-jWke
T- Nor, 2-243-, - 14E- x-h- 4Y, -5 -2- -202-3)

21. 34.:12.0990- Lor.atk.mPlacevT,aent of wireless communications facilities.

IMRIIMU - Mfederal law.

KIM
facilities in locations acc dLingIgAhe o[ lq!A inR rgferepcps ordered from ost p efegiqL lgast or RIfferred.

Supp. No. 40, 9/ 24) Created;
2024- 10- 29 13: 32; 08 [ EST] Page
20 of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 157 of 280

2.-_ Li,gh t lq(tust( iaN,. L1
ean arch dd9ptY9I eq.,q.'M_ t rcia Peneral Comme YLiRt! _tqt_ Industrial design eq LLrcel& J ....... . . -----

3. Public Facilities an Doen Space designated parcels 4.

IG.. enera.4...... 0ommercial designated nrcelL5. .. e................... orboC. Professional Nighbqmmercial and Office designated Is- 6. Mixed Use designated General Iijexqtq, o:!Dgt those desigmmerciaYICoRd, clesignated pgfc qstLi a% - shall bg_ p Lg(itizecl based on their, p _p2r[ Ditted residential cle with reference p ---- ve or, toa__ sites that allow maa. ......... --_._- ngtL__ i her maximum clensity. As Chjn this_priorityiayg!- then maximum density within th then I ........................................... 8.--- Histo
icall desi ated, paL s c 4s kith gLy n -, other fto. ximijy, to,Low-lDensity. qggtial Areas: Within each of the cajeg2rie Iited, bqvg,[ cqtions within Z00jget. qLf, p-pgEcel cl nated for low-d nsit residential land use _shali be considered lesspfg e than other areas in the same categgry ra e shall still be such sites considered more p(&__ Lthan locations, in AnyLo [-rAnkgd catggqryj iefg(nctjs intended to reduce p(?tp,njW se conflicts and visual impLcts, qn s!j!2SLtive residential areas. NoteJorthe qft i e iqq,, pg rcels ar e4q ignLatgd- yjancl us!;L,Ls. Ag. I2iLteA- qnth.g. Lity General Plan La se Ma as amended from time to time. L. -,,, Lupp2rt
stlyqufgpreferences. Subordinate tothg site oc tion references described insubsection p structures in
the followjqg. qrgEotpEeferen e, fi orq M2st preferred to least _p.referred: 1, nstq! Latjons of new stealth facilities within an existin lid n or structure that meet the desi n z 1e a s —tt o —th e,.!D a- x."i Mmu - mhe'-iRh_t,pp_(f!) Littg Lby _ Lh g. a p p!jc a & 4j:VicLt, and installations that are flush - mounted to an existin hi qL ic owe hen qeting_ LhtAg igalaL iLrertl, nts and I "1 0 M C prim 5. Installation
of new freesta dingAireless facilities C.-Ltss
rred locio structures. For app atns or locations preferred or igations hat involve lesseL- p structures , -4u bsMust demonstrate Lqnvincinecti ons A wind , B abo the app clear and 5, evidence that p gL jqy_rnoL ort structures withinlocations o , su pp--T'--- -A service the tarea would r eq q_ pT_ ferred be technically infeasible. eenf4c4-* vith,4i
ab4e, federal - G+--, tate -taw;- wif 6ess site 4R4,afeI44eett*a4 -as-4eseFA4e44' R- 1hi& PAo-r,e. pFefL- r+e4,+Feas- Supp. No. 40,
9/24) Created: 2024- 10-
29 13: 32: 08 [ EST] Page 21 of
37 Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 158 of 280
y-mow - ebr- e66e• ar-cel; kr wa
Geaateeraeia° eetadsiaess 6isissieai€ ire, rrrw i sees+gtatee€faeis; theta
mess-pr r - areas
f e- P r&+ca o aes s-Ica- aea e• sae aeaii r•-s-ea +tdai. ehage_- ego- eari•• calafi- ie- a less• refe w p area, --the ap# 4aHt . a
ra+t:agf. arati a .'- e# iLL te altertaaa ' e i + ta= .• r f tip . laat.. t iiera at dered e es° ee et";° al..b n- fair• 8 ireg,. ae e . trates; w, te' e- sati€ a kte` a i;• bs key- eae t•ai a tb€ e+rt-a etre- pref -& e s}+ s{ a e¢i} stet-teel i all-y easif le; ¢i+j° t, tee " a}ly. - ' bad&; ar+d/ ar-¢iii}° e etr . i .- da.e • . al ieg-bca a laerl ..- a i ityta e.°es - ldslaed•' - al s° pr r- a iert if,.d•®' g. e. ee . sttlasta t-tiaiatka • d ets:°
www.- Pdvritfrs aeda g. ara vas+ear e is- tie°.- 34°.0¢ Ee ata.are. e€. ire- ee r+Ea iesra• fa ali ies}• a ... es+ ra- - ri ay. ... _ pr ra • ° ra rt r ;
te- e•-e er t•#ea i 4e. ara•- rev+dad• t aattl-i aree-ee- ef. raere +r$- s+ erat+®r®f tiae b ttt+eg,J•a irr a r+ed21. 34.13.1000 Design requirements.

All wireless communications facilities bjeet- aeerit+so a a° em at r-ae adiaaastrative ite ara afc-h4te s-ai-°r ew rm#- shall be designed as a stealth facility, or as a concealed facility, as defined in Section 21; 34. 220 Definitions. and incorporate concealment measures and/ or techniques appropriate for the proposed location and design. All facilities and modifications thereto ( except those facilities which qualify as an eligible facilities request pursuant to Section 6409( a) or as a subsequent collocation facility that is a permitted use not subject to a city discretionary permit pursuant to California Government Code, 5 ics 65850. 6( a), for which these provisions shall serve only as guidelines) shall also comply with the Wireless Facility Design Requirements that have been adopted by the City. The cost or inconvenience to comply shall not provide justification to deviate from City design requirements.

Ord. No. 2226, § 5( Exh. A- 1), 9- 19- 2017)

21. 34. 140 (Post decision rocedures- discr:gIjgflgI ermits. tart r ° trayidrdonrai V w,° odg mmA° Zis ,, d.a
minis4ratican1shwall
ly°tca decisions on dscretican lyUVireless Ccarr rrtu°nic tins Facl,[ iPermits. These incl° udeg but °are wnot lim ed.tq.pro e_dures related to eals8• perrritWagclificatign, s prfcarrriarrce„&arantees and revocation. Supp. No. 40,
9/24) Created: 2024- 10-
29 13: 32: 08 [ EST] Page 22 of
37 Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 159 of 280
fjgqj[, jj rdance with the requirements of Chap
f4pggjsj., ha([,,bg.jeferred to the itj_qqn, i rather than thef annjing,Commission. 1 34< f °- f••" aye- , f u ..
di t+ . a t- - ad i aast- awe" atee... . r l+ t a#.•re 6 - + t-+s- ° red°-fe Ac ° y.. ra+ yd eat" i eetor)" iy e fied+ ra erd r°fie. h t I d€ een cea4ed-- f+ i ty as def`aaaed•• ra"fee#- 2 : 4. i); kae re € 3sedw faei€ity cif eatao ti n isti+ g" f y; s d+t -+ + .. com. p y- i-alp C. oP 64y; OF- eda e e istir g ii # y; s t+ .- Leo fly- i h w he• ; ter" n.. a. W ' n + Idtyz.. _ + tio ° d e". t- i h the 4-jl44:

21. 34. 15024 Failure to act and remedies.

Under federal and/ or Sstate law, the City' s failure to act on a wireless communications facility permit application within a reasonable period of time in accordance with the time periods and procedures established by applicable FCC decisions, accounting for tolling periods, may result in the permit being deemed granted by operation of law. To the extent federal or Sstate law provides a " deemed grant" remedy for wireless communications facility applications not timely acted upon by the City, no such application shall be deemed granted unless and until the applicant satisfies the following requirements:

A. For all facility applications:

I,..._ Fats".a • e.. 1i uoh I ° ce th+s
eia state, a _ a+ e a °
1-. Written notice. Following the date by which the City must take final action on the application ( as determined in accordance with the time periods and procedures established by applicable FCC decisions and accounting for tolling), the applicant must provide written notice to the City that the application is deemed granted by operation of law.

For 3-Felan u,-at .-rev iew-j)eFm4
applications:

1. Completes all public noticing required pursuant to Section 21. 64. 020 ( Notice of hearing).

2. No more than thirty_1301 calendar days before the date by which the City must take final action on the application ( as determined in accordance with the time periods and procedures established by applicable FCC decisions and accounting for tolling), the applicant must provide the following written notice to all recipients identified in Section 21. 64. 020( B)( 2) ( Mailing) and to the City.

Supp. No, 40, 9/ 24)
Created: 2024- 10- 29 13: 32; 08 [ EST]

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 160 of 280
a. The notice shall be delivered to the City in person or by certified United States mail. b. The notice must include:
p!ication to the Ci

1.292 PR
the city P,.oA,P !; cant b rrrutu4,,I tollin, m
reerner]t .
icontact_.... ".. v._T _ema Pent s i enti. rcotaon an in, ormation atio. , _.. _ as rrwd e on the a c,_,,,._._. tipn submittedto y..,, ggiowns on how to contact the ap cant, t„ mC,it an inst°_ v.. The followint terpertr: " Th° e Ct rn y n®t re gal temth t ce ent, cLonstructi rim° rid modification ofn.2„the oersgAireltssITserviceWwfacilities on basis of the„ environmentai effects of radiofre_ency orrnissions to_the _extent thatsumc, h facilities comfMIj° writh FCC re ulg[ tions concerning such emissions.. tm:..... m °+otiee.
e, 6aat, lae p dae- ar rra d-raW- p
i+ " o Eae i`; e e- ritie• 6ae seta o a
i€ +a G er l-Gen- 1 , 5tate4a y- deem- the- apple- ati ap re ° .- tb+rty• key der ays• a- eless- tkoex it-p re e t esmtkaee l+ t the ity pfs!" w aeb a ¢. eg. errt" Ord. No. 2226, § 5(
Exh. A-1), 9- 19- 2017) 21. 130_ Pf ahib"-•
ro a K21. 34.
16040
Revocation
of permit. The City may revoke
a permit for a wireless communications facility for noncompliance with any enforceable permit, permit condition, or law applicable to the facility. When the Rity- e eot 4 eterComrnunity 2evelopment Director finds reason to believe that grounds for permit revocation exist, the director shall notify the permittee that aviolation exists and request compliance within a reasonable amount of time. Upon failure to comply, the mu p eet- fife Corr muni Devel°o, rnpt Director may schedule a public hearing before the P,lanniq Cgmmissiwcan 4amn4Rg- ee ei&49R at which the commission may modify or revoke the permit. A revocation by the Plamr rii.n Commis sicanpl Rg mis maybe appealed to the City Council° as set forth by Chapter 21.62 Ao] eal All hearings for revocations or modification of previous y_Approvgd oer°mits And entitiements_ shall be noticed and conducted in compliance with the proceedings set forth in -Chapter 21.68 Revocations and modifications). Ord.

No, 2226, § 5(
Exh. A-1), 9- 19- 2017) Supp. No. 40, 9/
24) Created: 2024- 10- 29
13:32: 08 [ EST] Page 24 of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 161 of 280

21. 34. 1'70Temporary wireless communications facilities. A temporary wireless communications facility, such as a "cell - on -wheels" ( COW) may be used during public emergencies, including when alocal emergency is declared by the City Manager. A COW or similar temporary wireless communications facility or equipment shall not be permitted for maintenance activities or while awaiting an expected entitlement or pending plan review, and the temporary allowance of such equipment orfacility during an emergency shall not be considered toestablish apermanent use of such a facility or structure after the emergency has ended, as declared by the City Manager. Once the emergency has ended, the temporary wireless communications facility shall be removed b+the owner. Ord.

No. 2226, § 5( Exh. A- 1), 9- 19- 2017) 21.

34. 180 Limited exce tion from standards. IBMff
r " r r
1 r1
p1q]. e°
t• B s- • 1 d+ a• to- e3 trate - ,. - be• . ed:-. sa° frld - mot e es- t. _e s ta t- - r o + s .€.+ s. e° - t6a is- k t °#e it• - tile ° t Ar:....-.

A ig• ° ia+- i. e- ' see- ge- x s Supp.

No. 40, 9/ 24) Created:
2024- 10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST] Page
25 of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 162 of 280
rrtiail• a a1 >

21. 34. 190,70 Independent consultant review.

A. Authorization. The City Council authorizes the Comm4l ity_D nent Director to, in the r4i&-er•4er sole -discretion, select and retain an independent consultant with expertise in spgciakzed knowledgg in t6ecornirnuinr cabons ossrues or any.. ossues related to the ap cation for a Wireless C mEgg nic,ations Facilit, imes P, ermit te4e c- ati -sati eta t€ t eN t fir tr r 4rr ati r its any-frerr+t a- 0itior. p
Scope. Thety d4 ..- ....,.,...,_._. orramunity consultant gygjopM. gm Diwrector may request independentB. review on any issue that involves specialized or expert knowledge inconnection with the permit application.

Such issues may include, but are not limited to: 1.

Permit application completeness or accuracy; 2.

Pre - construction p(g! red cgmpIlian, cq__or pest - constriction gctuaI cornpL@nqg uvith @icable rq ulations for human exposure to H gmissions- Whe e-- a ' n ' - gap.. xi4t& er a- y 3.

Whether technically feasible and potentially available alternative locations and designs exist; 4.

The applicability, reliability and/or sufficiency of analyses or methodologies used by the applicant toreach conclusions about any issue within the scope of this Chapter; and 5.

Any other issue that requires expert or specialized knowledge identified by the 4- y lm . o Commui.,,,,,,, C. Deposit, Tovaopent Di„ rector. nty.,, C9 4t#irec# the full extent such costs are recoverable or collectible under applicable Sstate and/orfederal law, the applicant must pay for the reasonable cost of such review and for the technical consultant' s testimony inany hearing as requested by the ity. - ntrdi rCornrnunity Deyelgprrrg- nt Director and must provide a reasonable advance deposit ofthe estimated cost of such review with the City prior to the commencement of any work by the technical consultant. Where the advance deposit( s) are insufficient to pay forthe reasonable cost of such review and/ or testimony, the itye tdir Comrnunit Develo, 3ment Director shall invoice the applicant who shall pay the invoice in full within ten_ jq.)., calendar days after receipt of the invoice. Ord. No. 2226, §
5(Exh. A- 1), 9-19- 2017) 21. 34. 2,
004. Changes in law. All facilities shall
meet the current standards and regulations of the FCC, the California Public Utilities Commission, and any other agency of the federal or State government with the authority to regulate wireless communications providers and/ orwireless communications facilities. Ifsuch standards and/ or regulations are changed, the permittee and/ or wireless communications provider shall bring its facilities into compliance with such revised standards and regulations within ninety9M calendar days of the effective date of such standards and regulations, unlessa more stringent compliance schedule is mandated by the controlling federal or Sstate agency. Failure to bring wireless communications facilities into compliance with such revised standards and regulations shall constitute grounds for the immediate removal of such facilities atthe permittee and/or wireless communications provider' s expense.

Ord. No. 2226, § 5(
Exh. A-1), 9- 19- 2017) Supp. No. 40, 9/
24) Created: 2024- 10- 29
13:32: 09 [ EST] Page 26 of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 163 of 280

21. 34. 210. Severability.

In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction holds any ; sgection, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase in this e. 4:" c rg.°:: Da p. r er unconstitutional, preempted, or otherwise invalid, the invalid portion shall be severed from thisand shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this sec4onSc 14en(,ha Later. The City hereby declares that it would have adopted each sect+sos, ection, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrases in this ' 'C' ti2a„ iiter, irrespective ofthe fact that any one or more sw ections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases inthis &e, °•••••••, nSectir nCimtia t.L?rmight be declared unconstitutional, preempted, or otherwise invalid. Ord.

No. 2226, § 5( Exh. A-1), 9- 19- 2017) Sapp,
No. 40, 9/ 24) Created:
2024- 10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST] Page
27 of 37
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 164 of 280
Exhibit A

21. 34. 2292 Definitions.

As used in this Champter , the following terms shall have the meaning set forth below, unless the context clearly dictates a different meaning:

Antenna means as defin.gd t- &,K-C° in 47 C. F. R. Section 1ww6OO2 b . 2s ma b rnq!j ed or the earns _ _ j µ... a supprsgdgd.; itt" 4igreq ey.(RF-)
saki @ w4ae°- pd
der ai-wise ra€ioe. i ngii- iaafer-r aa i rn- ser-v' :- a i e.... st ices ,. ies r ' faes;.+ see w°oi liar" f€ ae°-t-ra + a°as e r° eipt..ef° lec yes.

Applicable FCC decisions"_ e-r...."a licable FCC rules" means the same as defined by California Government Code Sec4ioASectio 65964. 1( f), as may be amended or s°u ersededb- tkh terrna as ` I r-e Ret4tl n- fe De aarai-efj—Ro4g,- 24 i t; (:..W , 130-9 2009) a-m-i...lra- th .. R attr r of AcfN +ratren of 4.keadt>and.,Dejaeyasient° fey mfaroyingf 2ireirap si as :: tinturAs tu9ti y:y..Rekcies; pe r-t..arrnsf t.4der„ 2- Applicable law" means all applicable federal, Sstate and local law, ordinances, codes, rules, regulations and orders, as the same may be amended from time to time. C4R- . .
f&°: e + era . Obi fie• deAfkes
e I a eq a" s a e th C bioo4a Ala = ed rei 'eaEi r -het i • m ioo ° s- ae : ke sr e- s- ao• ss- afi aed• ....g eis+ s . ..:-feet° ); y.`. e ' .- a. o: pwivate; d
s, a - .- per- vises;-a° of&-- aabio d-+edess se v" fed ksaE& es... s.. pbi pa 6e. i rat; se a6ess._ e#.teol} e6eg' 6_ rafige i rn f_. - aa~. fe-=>z.:-,..g . 1 q; e _ mot.... p . e... if s e ra•. deseri& red- ice a a ap s, b- 1- f..-> v : Carefully
placed facility" means afacility that is situated in a location which renders afacility virtually imperceptible tothe public. As such, the emphasis forthis category of stealth facility is on its location as opposed toits design.

Carefully placed facilities require no camouflaging or screening, in that existing site features (e.g. buildings, walls, roof parapets, or existing equipment) render such a requirement unnecessary. Successful examples of carefully placed facilities may include those proposed within an existing building (requiring no alteration of existing materials), those sited on the roof of a particularly large or tall building, and those which are flush mounted to an existing high voltage lattice tower and treated to match. Campbell,
California, Code of Ordinances Supp.

No. 40, 9/ 24) Page
28 of 37 Created:
2024- 10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST]
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 165 of 280
ell site means aparcel ofreal property unwhich awireless communications facility is tobelocated. Collocation" means: 2. Notwithstandij) g,jt
bsectign jjj_wjL I cttq ei ible facilities re esiLs. . 1 collocation" means the sames defined in 47 C.

F.R. Section 1. 61 § IL2),, A,ggy be amended or superseded which defines that term as kqa ion" means the same as defined in 47 CRR Se transmitting As an illustration and not a limitation, the
FCC' s definition effectively means "to add" ne ip to istingLa.! Lfflty and does ummunicaduns" meansanytransmbdur^ emissiunu, ncepdunufdgnab' imagesandanundcvinfurmadunof any nature bywire, radio,
visual or electromagnetic system that work ona "line -of -sight" principle. Director" ur"dinectur" means theeo+ o***My 4e*e4op+next- ufthe
City ufCampbell urhis urher designee. Community " means the ufthe City ufCampbell. Completely integrated facility" means a
facility that is incorporated
into an existing structure or site in a manner which does not result inanew feature being added. This stealth category may result inthe removal ufexisting siding, ur materials tuachieve mFtransparency, provided that the replacement materials match' to the extent feasible, the existing or abutting material. Where an equivalent material match cannot be adequately demonstrated, astealth facility could propose to completely remove and replace an existing material if doing so serves tuachieve amore cohesive design and does not disrupt the design ufthe building (e.g. the replacement ufall roof shingles, asopposed tusimply removing/ replacing asmaller impacted roof u,wall secduns). Concealed facility" means any wireless communications facility which results in new site or architectural features being added to a
property in a manner which complements, enhances, or seamlessly integrates into their surroundings. Examples of concealed facilities include, but are not limited to the construction of new rooftop, louver, chimney, silo, pule, railing, sign, window, parapets, dormers, steeples, penthouses, water towers, bell towers, artificial trees, and flag pules. Deemed granted" or ''deemed granted status" means awireleo communications facility for which the applicant submitted an application in compliance
with the procedures and requirements of this Chapter that was not acted upon y fiwithin areasonable period uftime inaccordance with the time periods and procedures established by applicable FCC decisions ( accounting for tolling periods), and satisfied the requirements of GMC— Section 21.34.15-20 Created: 2024-20-2913. 32^08 [EST] Page 29 of33
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 166 of 280
Failure to act and remedies), and as a result had its permit granted by operation of law in accordance with federal and/ or Sstate law.

Electromagnetic field ( EMF)" means the local electric and magnetic fields that envelop the surrounding space.

The most ubiquitous source of electromagnetic fields is from the movement and consumption of electric power, ( e. g., transmission lines, household appliances and lighting).

E] igi lefq,cilities request° means the same as in 47 C. F. R. Section 1. 610®jb 3j,. ,_ rr py. b°g. mende or superseded. _._ °. ._..__.._.., .. _..._. ..

W . 0 .., µ.
4igi f aes...re saes "- eaf i .. e . defafae i + n. C •: eet+o . 1_e $ )$ , 4e amefad s. tq es° y weeia ifica ef. ex+sf6 e e prase k e d esu t 1 u 5ta,r44a4y. c4aRge44& 4 s. feu wew. OFa st i r ifi vifuge m C-® ea 6- effae iss4 i t;
Rea e ef- r e • q ° n;
iai:- F epleEet eft €° faf sff$issie +.eg4+pfRefat:"
Eligible support structure" means the same as defined - by -the -FCC in 47 C. F. R. Section 1. 6100( b)( 4), as may be amended or su ersdgd which defines that term as "[ a] ny tower or base station as defined in [ 47 C. F. R. Section 1. 6100] provided that it is existing at the time the relevant application is filed with the State or local government under [ 47 C. F. R. Section 1. 6100]."
Existing" means the same as defined- y-t4&. in 47 C. F. R. Section 1. 6100( b)( 5), as may be amendedaor su ersede, which provides that "[a] constructed tower or base station is existing for purposes ofthe [FCC rules implementing Section 6409 of the Spectrum Act, codified at 47 U.S. C. 1455] if it has been reviewed and approved under the applicable zoning or siting process, or under another State or local regulatory review process, provided that a tower that has not been reviewed and approved because it was not in a zoned area when it was built, but was lawfully constructed, is existing for purposes of this definition." FCC"
means the Federal Communications Commission or any successor tothat agency, which has primary regulatory control over communications providers through its powers to control interstate commerce and to provide acomprehensive national system in compliance with the Federal Communications Act. wireless sre facility" means a wireless communications facility, ttat is a self suu srtedtructu Freestanind_ and or
messages,
means
that
tq
antennas (
Personal
Stat.
9/
radio
ta,
156,
24)
a
means
maximum
frequency.
communications
services"
u°
codified
see
attached
provides
created:
private
x
Section
service"
as
wireless
recreation
trges
to
permissible
2024-
Section
aq
wireless
Section
10-
anymex°
to
wureiess
means
47 6409(
exposure.
6409(
ers,
U.
and

21. a)"
includes
a)
communications
thesameas.
istiny
communications
other
bus
than
services.

Nonemergency
of
S.
provider,

36. a
C.
tern
dLnp
defined
Section 1455(
the
Supp.
orar ,
r
a),
190 (
amateur (
in
communication,
company
commercial
as
stryet
Satellite
Middle
47 except
NnLirelgss
dish
Class
No.

HAM)
Tax
Ar mmm
may
communications
antennas))
Relief
U.
33 be
facilityw
h
when
radio
or
amended,
t
and
and
S.
2r
o
C..
40,
when
irgless
MPE"
Job

33. superseded.
facilities
organization,
cj
Service
or
Creation
facil
i]
licensed
associated
j }
ty_
used
Act
i}
by
the
provider"
for
of
with
was
sgecificail
agent
means
means
rr
2012,
includgs_
non29
aItg.,
a
the
grnencled
m
commercial
or
Pub.
13:
su
exchange
of
FCC,
L.
32:
wireless
a
of
and
erseded.

No.
ut
09 (
company
EST]
communication
satellite
facility.

Page
112-
30 dish
or
notmm ..
is
RF"
not
of
organization
96,
mounted
126
liM , gd
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 167 of 280
Significant gap" is a gap in the service provider' s own wireless communications facilities, as defined in federal case law interpretations of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Site" means the same as defined- - the-4: in 47 C. F. R. Section 1. 6100( b)( 6), as may be amended or su erseded, which provides in part that "[ flor towers other than towers in the public rights -of -way, the current boundaries of the leased or owned property surrounding the tower and any access or utility easements currently related to the site, and, for other eligible support structures, further restricted to that area in proximity to the structure and to other transmission equipment already deployed on the ground." Small wireless facillty" means the same as defined in 47 C. F. R. Section 1. 60021! LAs mpy be amended or su erseded.

State" means the State of California.

Stealth facility" means facilities which result in no perceptible visual impact. As such, stealth facilities are generally preferable to concealed facilities except in rare circumstances when the concealment method serves to improve the aesthetic value or interest to a building or site. There are two primary categories of stealth facilities, those which are completely integrated into an existing structure or architectural feature and those which are imperceptible as a result of careful placement. Both stealth categories require the facility to remain integrated or imperceptible, even when the facility may be expanded upon under the provisions of an eligible facilities request.

Substantial change" means the same as defined by the FCC in 47 C. F. R. Section 1. 6100( b)( 7), as may be amended r sli erseded_, which defines that term differently based on the particular facility type and location. For clarity, the definition in this Cha ter organizes the FCC' s criteria and thresholds for a substantial change according to the facility type and location.

1. For towers outside the public right- of-way, a substantial change occurs when:
a. The proposed collocation or modification increases the overall height more than ten percent or the height of one additional antenna array not to exceed twenty feet ( whichever is greater); or b. The proposed collocation or modification involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than twenty feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance ( whichever is greater); or c. The proposed collocation or modification involves the installation of more than the standard number of equipment cabinets for the technology involved, not to exceed four cabinets; or d. The proposed collocation or modification involves excavation outside the current boundaries of the leased or owned property surrounding the wireless tower, including any access or utility easements currently related to the site.

2. For towers in the public rights -of -way and for all base stations, a substantial change occurs when:
a. The proposed collocation or modification increases the overall height more than ten percent or ten feet whichever is greater); or
b. The proposed collocation or modification involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the structure that would protrude from the edge of the structure by more than six feet; or c. The proposed collocation or modification involves the installation of more than the standard number of equipment cabinets for the technology involved, not to exceed four cabinets; or d. The proposed collocation or modification involves the installation of any new equipment cabinets on the ground when there are no pre- existing ground cabinets associated with the structure; or e. The proposed collocation or modification involves the installation of any ground cabinets that are more than ten percent larger in height or overall volume than any otherground cabinets associated with the structure; or
Supp. No. 40, 9/ 24)
Created: 2024- 10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST]

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 168 of 280
f. The proposed collocation or modification involves excavation outside the area in proximity to the structure and other transmission equipment already deployed on the ground.

3. In addition, for all towers and base stations wherever located, a substantial change occurs when:
a. The proposed collocation or modification would defeat the existing concealment elements of the support structure as determined by the — rrurrr, u,° pity C, v l, o rr ent Directq or b. The proposed collocation or modification violates a prior condition of approval, provided however that the collocation need not comply with any prior condition of approval related to height, width, equipment cabinets or excavation that is inconsistent with the thresholds for a substantial change described in this Section.

4. Interpretation of t.Thresholds.
a. The thresholds for a substantial change described above are disjunctive. The failure to meet any one or more of the applicable thresholds means that a substantial changewould occur. b. The thresholds for height increases are cumulative limits. For sites with horizontally separated deployments, the cumulative limit is measured from the originally -permitted support structure without regard to any increases in size due to wireless equipment not included in the original design. For sites with vertically separated deployments, the cumulative limit is measured from the permitted site dimensions as they existed on February 22, 2012— the date that Congress passed Section 6409( a).

Support Structure" or " Support Structures" means a structure or structures designed to support antenna( s) or other wireless transmission equipment to facilitate the transmitting and/ or receiving of radio frequency signals. Support structures include, but are not limited to, masts, monopoles, guyed structures, lattice towers, and other like structures used to support wireless transmission devices.

Tar gte ser_...."_. mvice area' rea" means means .._ t " pgra ° mmi, c area_ identified by, th as Licant° vrher L ,!theJ ep ro p. ._ Deed wireless ati s . connmunicatuca, ns facility is mte°nded m tom„ provide r r ' ma ove service, based on the puf2I,ic aunt° s technical objectives such as coverage, Caualit;, Vlru°:
a@Dy iruffoasubj u auus tuu° ° uouu wDO ua . ¢ u aali uuce nautUo°° Qa°s a p u . c a girerneru tin this Char its yhysi caH rmp.Qo , gibl,e and...rmt n)ere, 1y niore_difficult. orur ars pnrurgve tU err auuq° rg: puTupaOi arit alterr tt ve. Temporary wireless communications facility" meansa wireless communications facility located on aparcel of land and consisting of a vehicle -mounted facility, abuilding mounted antenna, orasimilar facility, and associated equipment, that is used to provide temporary coverage foralarge-scale event or an emergency, or to provide temporary replacement coverage due tothe removal of an existing permitted, permanent wireless communications facility necessitated by the demolition or major alteration of a nearby property. Tower" means the same as defined - tf-"-i n 47 C. F. R. Section 1. 6100( b)(9), as may be amended or s,uersede i estbatmtew "{ a- j> yy- et -u lt• !- ary` ra pe f-su rti y_{FC-}_ Ia . K= mouth e#° ant ru- aru tkuei- seei . d- ikities; t s ir g- st u et .. .. + st eted# ' Bless u uu 4 ti Wiser - pie . ° + rug;- tt• . d ; °+vate; i a , t•a ri+ o y" i seas. e.. L+ nfi ed iu of+ d ie s° e ' e . °u' ku ie t} aekiatul; kue c+ated site: des Transmission equipment" or " wireless transmission equipment" means the same as defined by -in 47 C. F.R.

Section 1. 6100( b)(8), as may be amended, or superseded. k efaesiaat- tuna- es-" uia ghat i ' + es traa see rs; ant n ial..r fid .. cadle; egu far" crud° t}ae y~fie + rue4u des ent eted. its 4 " e a ti ru ° se es" ueda rug; t o &i ' e te; e ed eru iie fety s es; as edf- untieensed- ` fed rvv' -- and ' d r-& 4e ' ee-,- sueh i ave- 4aekhau l-.-" Supp. No. 40, 9/24) Created: 2024- 10-
29 13: 32: 09 [ EST] Page 32 of
33 Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 169 of 280
Visual impact" means the placement or design of a wireless communications facility such that it may be noticed by a person of average height when standing on the ground of a street, sidewalk or private property.

Wireless communications facility" means a land use facility supporting antennas that sends and/ or receives radio frequency signals, AM/ FM, microwave, and/ or electromagnetic waves for the purpose of providing voice, data, images or other information, including, but not limited to, cellular and/ or digital telephone service, personal communications services, and paging services. Wireless communications facilities include antennas and all other types of equipment for the transmission or receipt of the signals; towers or similar structures built to support the equipment; equipment cabinets, base stations, generators, cables, conduit, and other accessory development and support features; and screening and concealment elements. Also referred to as a " communication facility " facility-"," wireIessmmfacilit ; or wireless communications facilitv."
Wireless communications provider" means any company or organization that provides or who represents a company or organization that provides wireless communications services.

Ord. No. 2226, § 5( Exh. A- 1), 9- 19- 2017; Ord. No. 2293, § 1( Exh. 8), 5- 2- 2023) Supp. No. 40, 9/ 24)
Created: 2024- 10- 29 13: 32: 08 [ EST]

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 170 of 280
ORDINANCE NO. 2333

BEING AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL EXTENDING URGENCY MEASURES IN RESPONSE TO THE 2018 SMALL CELL ORDER ( FCC 18- 133) ISSUED BY THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION.

FILE NO. PLN- 2025- 50)
WHEREAS, on September 19, 2017, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2226, which repealed the former, and enacted the current, Chapter 21. 34 — Wireless Communications Facilities of the Campbell Municipal Code, which sets forth the City' s standards and procedures for the permitting and regulation of wireless communications facilities on private property in conjunction with the City' s adopted Wireless Facility Design Requirements, which were separately adopted by City Council Resolution No. 1226 on September 5, 2017;
WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of Ordinance No. 2226, the Federal Communications Commission issued its Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order ( FCC 18- 133), also known as the " 2018 Small Cell Order," which took effect on January 14, 2019, and significantly limited local authority over the siting and regulation of wireless facilities; WHEREAS, although the 2018 Small Cell Order primarily addresses installations within the public rights -of -way, it also affects private property by broadly interpreting the effective prohibition" clause under the Federal Telecommunications Act. As a result, local jurisdictions must waive or modify development standards, including height limits and placement requirements, if those standards are found to " materially inhibit" the provision of wireless service, significantly restricting the City' s ability to enforce existing regulations; WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code section 65858 and Campbell Municipal Code Section 21. 60. 090, the City Council is authorized to adopt interim ordinances as urgency measures to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, upon finding that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, and that the approval of additional permits or entitlements would result in that threat; WHEREAS, without interim regulations in place, the City may be forced to process wireless facility applications under outdated or legally vulnerable standards, potentially resulting in adverse aesthetic, environmental, and community impacts, and limiting the City's ability to mitigate these concerns;
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2025, the City Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 2331 to temporarily align the City's wireless facility permitting process with federal law while permanent updates to local regulations are prepared;
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department is currently conducting a study to update the City' s zoning provisions to ensure consistency with current law and to safeguard the public health, safety, and welfare. This study is expected to be completed within a reasonable time, not to exceed the duration of this interim extension, or until a permanent ordinance is adopted, whichever occurs first;
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 171 of 280
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858 authorizes the City Council to extend an interim ordinance for an additional 10 months and 15 days following public notice and a duly held public hearing;
WHEREAS, this matter was duly noticed and considered at a public hearing in accordance with applicable law;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that extending Interim Ordinance No. 2331 is necessary to preserve legally defensible local regulations consistent with federal law, while permanent regulations are developed and adopted through the standard legislative process; WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that extending the previously adopted interim ordinance ( Ordinance No. 2331) would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the city and is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of the Campbell Municipal Code; WHEREAS, based on the foregoing findings, the City Council further finds that an ongoing threat to public health, safety, or welfare remains, and that continued application of existing standards, requirements, and permitting procedures would exacerbate this threat.

These conditions, previously addressed by Interim Ordinance No. 2331, warrant its extension while permanent regulations are developed;
WHEREAS, the adoption of this ordinance does not constitute a " project" under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378, as it has no potential to cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical impact on the environment. Alternatively, if deemed a project, the ordinance may be found exempt under the common sense exemption ( Section 15061( b)( 3)), as it can be seen with certainty that no significant environmental impacts will result, and under Section 15308, as a regulatory action taken to protect the environment during the preparation of permanent regulations;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1 ( SEVERABILITY): If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this interim ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 2 ( CEQA): This Ordinance is not a " project" under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378. Alternatively, it is exempt under the common sense exemption (Section 15061( b)( 3)) and Section 15308, as a regulatory action taken to protect the environment.

SECTION 3 ( CONFORMANCE WITH LAW). Any provision of this Ordinance that conflicts with applicable state or federal. law shall be interpreted and applied to achieve compliance.

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 172 of 280
The provisions of this Ordinance shall prevail over any inconsistent provision of the Campbell Municipal Code for the duration of its effectiveness.

SECTION 5 ( PUBLICATION): The City Clerk shall cause this interim ordinance to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation within 15 days after its adoption in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.

SECTION 6 ( EFFECTIVENESS): Interim Ordinance No. 2331 is hereby extended for 10 months and fifteen days, or until it is superseded by adoption of superseding ordinance, whichever comes first.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 2025 by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: Bybee, Hines, Furtado, Lopez
NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: Scozzola
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None
APPROVED:

Sergio Lopez, Mayor
ATTEST: 41dya Andrea San
6414W
rs, City Clerk

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 173 of 280
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 174 of 280
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 175 of 280
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 176 of 280
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 177 of 280
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 178 of 280
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 179 of 280
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 180 of 280
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 181 of 280
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important From: Stephen Rose
To: "Vanitha V"; Clerks Office; Andrea Sanders
Cc: Ute Ren; [email protected]; [email protected]; Sylvie Kadivar Subject: RE: Submission of Community Letter Regarding Wireless Facility Ordinance Update Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2025 5:15:00 PM
Attachments: image001.png
image004.png
image007.png
image009.png
image010.png
image011.png
image012.png
Thanks Vanitha,
Your email and both PDF attachments have been received and added to the project file. This correspondence is now part of the public record and will be considered as the City develops the permanent Ordinance.

Thanks for your ongoing interest and participation. I hope that you’ll also attend our virtual community meeting next year, and would encourage you to sign up for courtesy email notifications as follows:
https://us5.list-manage.com/contact-form?
u=0b849d23198a3b47d4096a0c4&form_id=6fdf873c44acc6c1d97cfde6dd3280cb Best regards,
Stephen Rose
Senior Planner
City of Campbell | Community Development Department
(408) 866-2142 (call or text)
Book an Appointment with a Planner here.

Apply for Planning and Building Permits here.

From: Vanitha V <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2025 4:39 PM
To: Stephen Rose <[email protected]>; Clerks Office <[email protected]>; Andrea Sanders <[email protected]>
Cc: Ute Ren <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Sylvie Kadivar <[email protected]>
Subject: Submission of Community Letter Regarding Wireless Facility Ordinance Update Dear Stephen Rose and City Staff,
I’m forwarding a signed letter from my neighbors, Ute Ren and Alan Ren, regarding Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 182 of 280
wireless facility installations in our area. Please include it in the public record and share it with the appropriate departments or Council for review.

Kindly confirm receipt of this email and the attached letter.

Thank you for your time and attention.

Best regards,
Vanitha Venkateshlu
803 Cambrian Drive
Campbell, CA 95008
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 183 of 280
Feedback on Interim Wireless Ordinance &
Concerns About Residential Tower Siting
To the attention of Stephen Rose, Campbell Mayor, Councilmembers, and Planning Staff,
Thank you for adopting the interim wireless ordinance as part of the City’s efforts to update Chapter 21.42 of the Municipal Code. I appreciate Campbell’s proactive approach to balancing infrastructure needs with community safety and neighborhood character.

However, I remain deeply concerned about the construction of freestanding wireless towers in or near residential neighborhoods (i.e., homes, apartments, townhomes, schools, and elder-care facilities, nursing facilities). These areas include families with children, elderly residents, and individuals with compromised immune systems. While the long-term health effects of radiofrequency (RF) exposure continue to be studied, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the World Health Organization, has classified RF electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) (WHO/IARC, 2011). The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) also updated its exposure guidelines in 2020, recognizing the need for stricter technical protections (ICNIRP, 2020). In line with international practice, several European countries (including France and Germany) recommend precautionary siting distances, particularly for facilities near schools and residences.

Economic and quality-of-life concerns must also be taken seriously. Research has found that the presence of large wireless towers can reduce nearby property values. For example, peer-reviewed studies have documented measurable price reductions of between 2–9% in markets where towers are sited near homes (Bond & Wang, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2005; Gibbons & Machin, Economic Journal, 2005; Savvopoulos et al., International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 2024). This is compounded by disclosure requirements, buyer hesitancy, and potential insurance complications. Neighborhood aesthetics and visual character are also diminished when towers are placed near residences or community spaces.

Transparency in applications is equally critical. In past cases, such as the contested 2633 South Bascom Avenue site in Campbell, applicants mischaracterized land uses in their filings (e.g., labeling a multi-family residence as a “motel”). Such misrepresentations undermine public trust and highlight the need for independent verification of all key claims.

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 184 of 280
The City has authority under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (§332(c)(7)) to regulate siting based on zoning, aesthetics, property values, and land-use compatibility. While the Act prohibits cities from denying applications solely on RF health grounds if they meet FCC standards, it does not preempt reasonable local rules regarding setbacks, design, collocation, and neighborhood compatibility (FCC, 1996; US Code, 47 §332).

Additionally, under FCC rules and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), certain tower proposals require an Environmental Assessment (EA), particularly when they may affect historic preservation, community character, or cumulative RF exposure. (FCC NEPA Rules, 47 CFR §1.1307). Towers near schools, parks, or sensitive residential areas may meet this threshold.

In light of these concerns, I respectfully urge the City to adopt the following measures in the permanent ordinance:

1. Setbacks: Require a minimum 500-meter (1,640-foot) buffer for new freestanding towers from homes, schools, parks, and health facilities, unless collocation and less-intrusive alternatives are proven infeasible.

2. Independent verification: Mandate third-party review of application claims (land use, distances, RF modeling), funded by the applicant through fees or deposits.

3. Property-value disclosure: Require applicants to provide an independent appraisal or real-estate market impact study when siting towers near residences.

4. Design standards: Prioritize stealth designs and collocation in commercial/industrial zones, consistent with the principle of “least intrusive means.”

5. Public participation: Require robust notice (at least 30 days in advance) to property owners within 1,000 feet of a proposed site and ensure a public hearing process.

6. Monitoring and compliance: Require post-construction RF compliance testing and periodic re-certification to ensure ongoing adherence to FCC limits.

7. Temporary moratorium: Adopt a 6–12 month moratorium on new freestanding towers in residential zones while the Municipal Code is updated, as other cities have successfully done (e.g., Los Altos, San Bruno).

Conclusion
By grounding these rules in aesthetics, land-use compatibility, property values, and transparency, areas where local governments retain clear authority Campbell Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 185 of 280
can create a legally defensible, forward-thinking ordinance that protects both infrastructure needs and neighborhood integrity.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns and for your continued service to our community.

Sincerely,
Vanitha Venkateshlu
Recoverable Signature
X
Vanitha Venkateshlu
Signed by: S-1-12-1-2924052379-1126473214-1601779127-974497509/f164c610-005c-4bcf-9ecd-8eb6e24be2e8 803 Cambrian Drive, Campbell, CA 95008
[email protected]
650 823 8978
References / Citations (for staff and Council)
• WHO/IARC. (2011). IARC classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).
• ICNIRP. (2020). Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Physics, 118(5).
• FCC. (1996). A Local Government Official’s Guide to Transmitting Antenna RF Emission Safety.
• 47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7) — Telecommunications Act of 1996. o
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 186 of 280
Additional International Scientific Sources
NIH Literature Review (2022):

Documents health concerns such as RF sickness and cancer within 300–500 m of towers. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35843283/
Aalto University (2020):

Reviews limitations of U.S. regulatory approach and links non-thermal RF effects to neuropsychiatric symptoms.
https://research.aalto.fi/files/40738889/Limiting_Liability_with_Positioning_to_M.pdf Environmental Health News (2024):

German study showing chromosomal changes in residents near towers. https://www.ehn.org/cell-phone-tower-chromosomes
Building Biology Institute Factsheet:

Advocates for strong residential RF avoidance guidelines. https://buildingbiologyinstitute.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/04/EMR_Factsheet_v2.0r.pdf Physicians for Safe Technology (PST):

Supports rigorous review of health risks and demands for safer siting practices. https://mdsafetech.org/advocacy/
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 187 of 280
Selected U.S.-Based Public Health and Property
Impact References
New Hampshire Commission on 5G Health and Environment (2020):

Recommended minimum 500-meter setbacks for wireless towers in residential areas. https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rfs/Reports/2020_Final_Report_of_the_Comm_on_5G.pd f
Environmental Health Trust (EHT):

Aggregates peer-reviewed studies and federal reports on wireless health impacts and zoning best practices.
https://ehtrust.org/cell-towers-and-cell-antennae/compilation-of-research-studies-oncell-tower-radiation-and-health/ Bond & Wang (2005), Appraisal Journal:

Showed that homes within 1,000 feet of a cell tower experienced property value declines of 10–20%.
https://appraisalinstitute.org/assets/1/7/TAJ_Spring05.pdf American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Policy Statement:

Calls for reevaluation of RF safety limits due to greater vulnerability of children to EMR. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2012/10/15/peds.2012- 2850.full.pdf
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) Report on RF Emissions (2012):

Cited lack of recent comprehensive safety studies and called on FCC to revisit outdated exposure standards.
https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-12-771.pdf
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 188 of 280
Community Sign-On Page
If you agree with the concerns and recommendations outlined in this letter, please add your name and contact information below. This community sign-on sheet will be submitted to the City of Campbell.

Name Address (or Neighborhood) Email (optional)
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 189 of 280
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 190 of 280
1 Stephen Rose
From: Victor Moiseyev <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2025 9:17 PM
To: Stephen Rose
Cc: Andrea Sanders; Clerks Office
Subject: Feedback on Interim Wireless Ordinance & Concerns About Residential Tower Siting Dear Stephen,
Thank you for adopting the interim wireless ordinance as part of the City’s efforts to update Chapter 21.42 of the Municipal Code.

This letter outlines the serious concerns held by area residents regarding the construction of freestanding wireless towers in residential areas, with specific reference to the proposed project at 2633 S. Bascom Avenue
This letter is also documents the persistent community opposition to the proposed wireless tower at 2633 S. Bascom Avenue, with particular emphasis on the potential health and safety risks. Our concerns are not speculative; they are based on the tower's extremely close proximity to residences and existing scientific evidence.

The proposed location is a mere 60 meters from my home, will be placing my family and my neighbors in a potential high-exposure zone. This proximity is critical, as studies have shown that residents living near base stations can report significantly more health symptoms, with some evidence linking long-term exposure to more serious health issues.

Furthermore, an analysis of the provided antenna radiation pattern reveals that the main lobe of the signal will be directed to our residential properties. This positions our families directly in the concentrated path of RF and microwave emissions.

While we recognize the need for reliable telecommunications, it is essential to prioritize public health.

We urge you to reconsider this location and to pursue alternative solutions that do not jeopardize the well-being of our community. We expect a formal response outlining how you will address the evidence-based concerns raised by affected residents
In evaluating the potential impact of the proposed tower, I performed an illustrative assessment of electromagnetic radiation levels at an existing, comparable tower site located on S. McGlincy Ln. The readings documented during this exercise demonstrated that significant levels of RF, ELF, and EMF radiation are present in the near-field of similar installations. The measurements were performed with EMF Meter, Advanced GQ EMF-390 Multi-Field Electromagnetic Radiation 3-in-1 EMF ELF RF meter, 5G Cell Tower Smart meter Wifi Signal Detector RF up to 10GHz with Data Logger and

2.5Ghz Spectrum Analyzer, which is used by individuals, organizations and the governments(Eg. US Department of State)
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 191 of 280
2 Measurements from an EMF meter indicated that radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic radiation 50 to 100 meters from the cell tower was well above the safe threshold. Consequently, the area is designated as "Not recommended for long time stay"
According to major regulatory and health organizations, a distance of 500 meters (about 1,640 feet) from a cell tower is considered a safe distance for public exposure. The radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure at this distance is well within established safety limits.

In addition to potential health impacts, there are quality of life and economic concerns that must be taken seriously. The presence of large towers in residential zones can significantly affect neighborhood aesthetics and generate stress or unease for nearby residents. Home values may decline by 10–20% when located near visible or high-powered cell towers, especially when close to bedrooms or outdoor living spaces. These economic effects are compounded by buyer hesitancy, insurance considerations, and property disclosure obligations.

Moreover, accuracy and transparency in tower applications are critical. In past cases such as the publicly contested 2633 South Bascom Avenue, Campbell, CA 95008 site, the applicant mischaracterized a multi-family residence as a “motel” in their documentation. Such behavior undermines public trust and highlights the need for independent verification of claims.

The City of Campbell’s Municipal Code and zoning framework must remain the primary basis for siting decisions. Any proposed wireless facility that violates established height, setback, or aesthetic guidelines should be deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses. Further, under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, providers are expected to prioritize collocation on existing structures and must demonstrate that no less intrusive alternatives exist. This legal standard provides the City with discretion to reject applications that do not meet zoning or community compatibility criteria.

In light of growing community concern and gaps in existing regulations, we also respectfully urge the City to consider adopting a temporary moratorium on new wireless facility approvals. A moratorium will allow sufficient time to update Campbell’s Municipal Code, integrate recent federal and scientific findings, and establish clearer public health protections in residential zones.

Under FCC rules, certain towers may require an Environmental Assessment (EA) even if they would otherwise be categorically excluded—especially if there are concerns about historic preservation, community character, or cumulative RF exposure. We believe this threshold may be triggered for towers near sensitive residential, school, or park locations and should be investigated.

While regulators often cite that RF exposure levels fall off rapidly with distance, exposure at close proximity remains a concern, particularly in dense neighborhoods with multiple overlapping signal sources. The effective radiated power (ERP) in urban small-cell deployments may be lower than in rural areas, but cumulative exposure and 24/7 emissions in residential zones still warrant strong setbacks. International best practices—particularly in Germany and France—recommend greater buffer zones when near homes or schools.

We respectfully urge the City to consider the following in the permanent ordinance:

1. Increase the minimum setback for new freestanding towers to at least 1640 feet (500 meters) from residential homes, schools, parks, and health facilities.

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 192 of 280
3 2. Mandate third-party verification of all application claims (e.g., land use, proximity to dwellings).

3. Explicitly consider property value impacts, and require applicants to submit real estate impact disclosures as part of the review process.

4. Prioritize stealth designs and co-location in commercial or industrial zones, consistent with the principle of “least intrusive means.”

5. Ensure robust public notice and hearing opportunities, especially when facilities are proposed near sensitive areas.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns and for your continued service to our community. I hope the City will adopt a forward-thinking, community-first approach in its final wireless ordinance.

Sincerely,
Victor Moiseyev
2140 Vizcaya Cir, Campbell, CA 95008
e-mail: [email protected]
phone: 408.369.9999
Additional International Scientific Sources
NIH Literature Review (2022):

Documents health concerns such as RF sickness and cancer within 300–500 m of towers. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35843283/

Aalto University (2020):

Reviews limitations of U.S. regulatory approach and links non-thermal RF effects to neuropsychiatric symptoms.
https://research.aalto.fi/files/40738889/Limiting_Liability_with_Positioning_to_M.pdf

Environmental Health News (2024):

German study showing chromosomal changes in residents near towers. https://www.ehn.org/cell-phone-tower-chromosomes
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 193 of 280
4 Building Biology Institute Factsheet:

Advocates for strong residential RF avoidance guidelines. https://buildingbiologyinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/EMR_Factsheet_v2.0r.pdf

Physicians for Safe Technology (PST):

Supports rigorous review of health risks and demands for safer siting practices. https://mdsafetech.org/advocacy/

Selected U.S.-Based Public Health and Property Impact
References
New Hampshire Commission on 5G Health and Environment (2020):

Recommended minimum 500-meter setbacks for wireless towers in residential areas. https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rfs/Reports/2020_Final_Report_of_the_Comm_on_5G.pdf

Environmental Health Trust (EHT):

Aggregates peer-reviewed studies and federal reports on wireless health impacts and zoning best practices.
https://ehtrust.org/cell-towers-and-cell-antennae/compilation-of-research-studies-on-cell-towerradiation-and-health/

Bond & Wang (2005), Appraisal Journal:

Showed that homes within 1,000 feet of a cell tower experienced property value declines of 10–20%. https://appraisalinstitute.org/assets/1/7/TAJ_Spring05.pdf

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Policy Statement:

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 194 of 280
5 Calls for reevaluation of RF safety limits due to greater vulnerability of children to EMR. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2012/10/15/peds.2012-2850.full.pdf

U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) Report on RF Emissions (2012):

Cited lack of recent comprehensive safety studies and called on FCC to revisit outdated exposure standards.
https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-12-771.pdf
References previously submitted to the City:
 Environmental Health Trust (EHT):

This non-profit organization serves as a resource for information on EMF and wireless radiation. They link to many studies on their website and argue for stronger safety precautions, citing research that suggests potential health effects at levels below official guidelines. o Related URL: https://ehtrust.org/cell-towers-and-cell-antennae/compilation-of-researchstudies-on-cell-tower-radiation-and-health/  EMF Center:

This site discusses the debate over safe distances and cites studies that have reported adverse health effects, which some have used to suggest buffer zones. o Related URL: https://emfcenter.com/what-distance-is-safe/  Building Biology Institute:

This organization promotes healthy home environments and recommends precautionary measures for EMF exposure, including maintaining distance from wireless infrastructure like cell towers.
o Related URL: https://buildingbiologyinstitute.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/04/EMR_Factsheet_v2.0r.pdf  Physicians for Safe Technology (PST):

This group advocates for increased scrutiny of wireless technology and supports efforts to limit EMF exposure. They specifically argue for more robust health and environmental surveys before placing cell towers in residential areas.
o Related URL: https://mdsafetech.org/advocacy/
Scientific reviews citing studies of concern
 National Institutes of Health (NIH) literature review (2022):

This review of existing literature, including studies on exposure near cell phone base stations, documented reports of health issues like "radiofrequency sickness," cancer, and altered biochemical parameters. It references numerous smaller studies that found effects within 300 to 500 meters of towers.
o Related URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35843283/  Aalto University analysis (2020):

This paper reviews literature linking exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) from cell towers to negative health outcomes and neuropsychiatric complaints. It highlights the peculiar Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 195 of 280
6 limitations of US law, which currently disregards the non-thermal biological effects that many studies have reported.
o Related
URL:https://research.aalto.fi/files/40738889/Limiting_Liability_with_Positioning_to_M.pd f
Media and research summaries
 Environmental Health News (EHN) article (2024):

This article describes a German study finding chromosomal damage in people living closer to cell towers, even at exposure levels within official safety limits. o Related URL: https://www.ehn.org/cell-phone-tower-chromosomes  NIH PubMed article:

A 2009 article in the National Library of Medicine, discussing mobile phone base stations and self-reported adverse health effects among a substantial proportion of the German population. o URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19017702/

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 196 of 280
1 Stephen Rose
Subject: RE: Cell Tower Ordinance Related
From: satish Padmanabhan <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2025 5:02 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Cell Tower Ordinance Related

Dear Bill,
My name is Satish and I am a Campbell Resident. I am very thankful to you for making the city have a reasonable plan for building cell towers.

I am writing to you about the Campbell Interim Ordinance regarding Wireless Communication Facilities. I have shared this ordinance with my attorney (Gail Parish) and she had some feedback on this. I have included them along with this email. She is happy to get on a call with you to discuss further. Please review her email and advise if she can call you to discuss this. Thanks.

Thanks,
Satish Padmanabhan
408 480 0960
Satish,
Thanks for sharing the video of the City Council meeting in which the wireless urgency ordinance was recently adopted. I am concerned about two issues where I think staff may be misunderstanding federal law, and one additional issue where I think the wireless regulations could be stronger.

1. Staff seems to think the "materially inhibits" standard for evaluating an effective prohibition claim under federal law that was discussed in the FCC’s Small Cell Order must be applied to all wireless facilities regardless of size and is not limited to 5G small cells.

I don’t agree with staff’s interpretation here. I believe it overstates the scope of the Ninth Circuit’s decision in City of Portland v. United States, 969 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 2020). While the Ninth Circuit did uphold most of the FCC’s Small Cell Order which applies the materially inhibits standard, a careful reading of both the FCC Order and the Court’s decision shows that both were narrowly focused on local regulation of 5G technology requiring the installation of large numbers of small cell facilities. The FCC’s specific concerns about barriers to deployment of 5G technology were what drove the FCC to issue its declaratory order applying the materially inhibits standard to limit local regulation of 5G small cells (imposing limits as to fees and aesthetics). Likewise, in upholding most of the Small Cell Order, the Ninth Circuit pointed repeatedly to the FCC’s order being rooted in the uniqueness of 5G technology deployments.

I would also note that, in upholding most of the Small Cell Order, the Ninth Circuit did not expressly reject its own ample existing precedent applying the "significant gap/least intrusive means" standard for effective prohibition claims involving macro wireless facilities. That standard is set out in well-known cases including T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. City of Anacortes, 572 F.3d 987 (9th Cir. 2009) and Sprint PCS Assets, LLC. v. City of Palos Verdes Ests., 583 F.3d 716 (9th Cir. 2009). And that standard continues to be applied by lower courts in cases after the Ninth Circuit’s decision in City of Portland. For example see, Weis Towers LLC v. Kootenai Cnty., No. 2:24-CV-00375-BLW, 2025 WL 2549838, at *10 (D. Idaho Sept. 4, 2025)(citing Anacortes, 572 F.3d at 997-98); New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Kootenai Cnty., No. 2:23-CV-00124-AKB, 2025 WL 563911, at *10 (D. Idaho Feb. 20, 2025) (same); GTE Mobilnet of California Ltd. P’ship v. City of Berkeley, No. 20-CV-05460-DMR, 2024 WL 4581307, at *8 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2024) (same).

While we anticipate seeing industry plaintiffs increasingly trying to expand the scope of the materially inhibits standard beyond 5G small cell technology, and while the FCC has recently launched a rulemaking proceeding in which it has asked for comment on potential ways it could expand the Small Cell Order “reforms” to macro cell towers that support of 5G services, today there is no clear court mandate to apply that standard. As such, there is no benefit to the City getting ahead of existing Ninth Circuit precedent and adopting this industry-friendly interpretation.

2. Staff's answer to a council member question suggested Staff seem to think wireless development standards must be objective.

This is also not correct. The FCC’s Small Cell Order did have a requirement that aesthetic standards for small cell facilities must be objective. But that requirement was struck down by the Ninth Circuit in City of Portland. I would want to make sure the City understands its full authority can allow for design criteria that are subjective for all wireless facilities.

3. The hierarchy of preferences in the wireless ordinance would ultimately allow unconcealed facilities (provided the applicant could show other preferences not feasible).

Stronger regulations would require all facilities to be stealthed and better protect views. These requirements not only provide better aesthetic outcomes, but they can help limit the ability of carriers to implement future changes to the wireless facilities through applications for eligible facilities requests which must be approved by local governments under federal law and FCC regulations.

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 197 of 280
2 Gail A. Karish
Partner
[email protected]
T: (213) 605-1603
bbklaw.com |
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 198 of 280
1 Stephen Rose
From: Sylvie Kadivar <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2025 12:31 PM
To: Stephen Rose
Cc: Andrea Sanders
Subject: Feedback on Cell Tower Ordinance that is in the works Attachments: Wireless_Tower_Letter_Campbell_Complete_October_22_2025.pdf Hi Stephen,
I’m writing to share feedback regarding the proposed cell tower ordinance. The memories of last year’s Bascom tower proposal remain vivid in our community.

Health concerns, potential impacts on property values, and overall quality of life continue to be significant issues with lasting consequences. The Bascom proposal, which was ultimately rejected, raised deep concern that the business interests of a single individual or family were being prioritized over those of 100's if not 1000's of nearby residents within a 500-meter radius. Even nearby commercial property owners had not been properly informed.

During the prior hearing, the misrepresentation of a neighboring apartment complex as a “motel” in order to justify a 75-foot wireless tower shocked many in our community. We believe that individuals who knowingly misstate facts or mislead the public to obtain permits should not be permitted to submit further applications.

Thank you again for providing the opportunity to voice our continued concerns. Please let us know if there are any public hearings pertaining to the cell tower ordinance. So that the community has time to share their feedback. Attached is a list of recommendations for the cell tower ordinance.

Please acknowledge reception.

Kind regards,
/Sylvie Kadivar
2155 Vizcaya Circle, Campbell Ca, 95008.

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 199 of 280
Feedback on Interim Wireless Ordinance &
Concerns About Residential Tower Siting
To the attention of Stephen Rose, Planning Staff for Campbell, Ca Thank you for adopting the interim wireless ordinance as part of the City’s efforts to update Chapter 21.42 of the Municipal Code. I appreciate Campbell’s proactive approach to balancing infrastructure needs with community safety and neighborhood character.

However, I remain deeply concerned about the construction of freestanding wireless towers in or near residential neighborhoods (i.e., homes, apartments, townhomes, schools, and elder-care facilities, nursing facilities). These areas include families with children, elderly residents, and individuals with compromised immune systems. While the long-term health effects of radiofrequency (RF) exposure continue to be studied, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the World Health Organization, has classified RF electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) (WHO/IARC, 2011). The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) also updated its exposure guidelines in 2020, recognizing the need for stricter technical protections (ICNIRP, 2020). In line with international practice, several European countries (including France and Germany) recommend precautionary siting distances, particularly for facilities near schools and residences.

Economic and quality-of-life concerns must also be taken seriously. Research has found that the presence of large wireless towers can reduce nearby property values. For example, peer-reviewed studies have documented measurable price reductions of between 2–9% in markets where towers are sited near homes (Bond & Wang, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2005; Gibbons & Machin, Economic Journal, 2005; Savvopoulos et al., International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 2024). This is compounded by disclosure requirements, buyer hesitancy, and potential insurance complications. Neighborhood aesthetics and visual character are also diminished when towers are placed near residences or community spaces.

Transparency in applications is equally critical. In past cases, such as the contested 2633 South Bascom Avenue site in Campbell, applicants mischaracterized land uses in their filings (e.g., labeling a multi-family residence as a “motel”). Such misrepresentations undermine public trust and highlight the need for independent verification of all key claims.

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 200 of 280
The City has authority under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (§332(c)(7)) to regulate siting based on zoning, aesthetics, property values, and land-use compatibility. While the Act prohibits cities from denying applications solely on RF health grounds if they meet FCC standards, it does not preempt reasonable local rules regarding setbacks, design, collocation, and neighborhood compatibility (FCC, 1996; US Code, 47 §332).

Additionally, under FCC rules and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), certain tower proposals require an Environmental Assessment (EA), particularly when they may affect historic preservation, community character, or cumulative RF exposure. (FCC NEPA Rules, 47 CFR §1.1307). Towers near schools, parks, or sensitive residential areas may meet this threshold.

In light of these concerns, I respectfully urge the City to adopt the following measures in permanent ordinance:

1. Setbacks: Require a minimum 500-meter (1,640-foot) buffer for new freestanding towers from homes, schools, parks, and health facilities, unless collocation and less-intrusive alternatives are proven infeasible.

2. Independent verification: Mandate third-party review of application claims (land use, distances, RF modeling), funded by the applicant through fees or deposits.

3. Property-value disclosure: Require applicants to provide an independent appraisal or real-estate market impact study when sitting in towers near residences.

4. Design standards: Prioritize stealth designs and collocation in commercial/industrial zones, consistent with the principle of “least intrusive means.”

5. Public participation: Require robust notice (at least 30 days in advance) to property owners within 1,000 feet of a proposed site and ensure a public hearing process.

6. Monitoring and compliance: Require post-construction RF compliance testing and periodic re-certification to ensure ongoing adherence to FCC limits.

7. Temporary moratorium: Adopt a 6–12 month moratorium on new freestanding towers in residential zones while the Municipal Code is updated, as other cities have successfully done (e.g., Los Altos, San Bruno).

We understand that there are federal guidelines. However, federal preemption does not limit the City’s zoning authority to regulate the placement, design, aesthetics, and land-use compatibility of wireless infrastructure. The City can still Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 201 of 280
uphold its duty to protect public welfare by enforcing robust local setbacks, prioritizing industrial zones over residential siting, and requesting evidence of technical necessity and site analysis for each proposed location.

Moreover, credible scientific and real estate studies, can inform future ordinance revisions, justify a temporary moratorium, or support the development of one.

In addition, proposals which are within city limits bordering another city must factor in and involve the neighboring city and it’s residences in the planning process.

Conclusion
By grounding these rules in aesthetics, land-use compatibility, property values, and transparency, areas where local governments retain clear authority Campbell can create a legally defensible, forward-thinking ordinance that protects both infrastructure needs and neighborhood integrity.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns and for your continued service to our community.

Sincerely,
Name : Sylvie Kadivar
Address: 2155 Vizcaya Circle, Campbell Ca. 95008
Email : [email protected]
References / Citations (for staff and Council)
• WHO/IARC. (2011). IARC classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).
• ICNIRP. (2020). Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Physics, 118(5).
• FCC. (1996). A Local Government Official’s Guide to Transmitting Antenna RF Emission Safety.
• 47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7) — Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 202 of 280
Additional International Scientific Sources
NIH Literature Review (2022):

Documents health concerns such as RF sickness and cancer within 300–500 m of towers. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35843283/
Aalto University (2020):

Reviews limitations of U.S. regulatory approach and links non-thermal RF effects to neuropsychiatric symptoms.
https://research.aalto.fi/files/40738889/Limiting_Liability_with_Positioning_to_M.pdf Environmental Health News (2024):

German study showing chromosomal changes in residents near towers. https://www.ehn.org/cell-phone-tower-chromosomes
Building Biology Institute Factsheet:

Advocates for strong residential RF avoidance guidelines. https://buildingbiologyinstitute.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/04/EMR_Factsheet_v2.0r.pdf Physicians for Safe Technology (PST):

Supports rigorous review of health risks and demands for safer siting practices. https://mdsafetech.org/advocacy/
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 203 of 280
Selected U.S.-Based Public Health and Property
Impact References
New Hampshire Commission on 5G Health and Environment (2020):

Recommended minimum 500-meter setbacks for wireless towers in residential areas. https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rfs/Reports/2020_Final_Report_of_the_Comm_on_5G.pd f
Environmental Health Trust (EHT):

Aggregates peer-reviewed studies and federal reports on wireless health impacts and zoning best practices.
https://ehtrust.org/cell-towers-and-cell-antennae/compilation-of-research-studies-oncell-tower-radiation-and-health/ Bond & Wang (2005), Appraisal Journal:

Showed that homes within 1,000 feet of a cell tower experienced property value declines of 10–20%.
https://appraisalinstitute.org/assets/1/7/TAJ_Spring05.pdf American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Policy Statement:

Calls for reevaluation of RF safety limits due to greater vulnerability of children to EMR. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2012/10/15/peds.2012- 2850.full.pdf
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) Report on RF Emissions (2012):

Cited lack of recent comprehensive safety studies and called on FCC to revisit outdated exposure standards.
https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-12-771.pdf
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 204 of 280
From: Tatyana Moiseyeva
To: Stephen Rose
Cc: Andrea Sanders
Subject: Feedback on Interim Wireless Ordinance & Concerns About Residential Tower Siting Date: Monday, October 27, 2025 8:22:12 PM
Attachments: petition_page2.pdf
petition_page1.pdf
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Feedback on Interim Wireless Ordinance & Concerns
About Residential Tower Siting
To the attention of Stephen Rose, Campbell Mayor, Councilmembers, and Planning Staff,
Thank you for adopting the interim wireless ordinance as part of the City’s efforts to update Chapter 21.42 of the Municipal Code. I appreciate Campbell’s proactive approach to balancing infrastructure needs with community safety and neighborhood character.

However, I remain deeply concerned about the construction of freestanding wireless towers in or near residential neighborhoods (i.e., homes, apartments, townhomes, schools, and elder-care facilities, nursing facilities). These areas include families with children, elderly residents, and individuals with compromised immune systems. While the long-term health effects of radiofrequency (RF) exposure continue to be studied, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the World Health Organization, has classified RF electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) (WHO/IARC, 2011). The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) also updated its exposure guidelines in 2020, recognizing the need for stricter technical protections (ICNIRP, 2020). In line with international practice, several European countries (including France and Germany) recommend precautionary siting distances, particularly for facilities near schools and residences.

Economic and quality-of-life concerns must also be taken seriously.

Research has found that the presence of large wireless towers can reduce nearby property values. For example, peer-reviewed studies have documented measurable price reductions up to 20% in markets where towers are sited near homes (Bond & Wang, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2005; Gibbons & Machin, Economic Journal, 2005; Savvopoulos et al., International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 2024). This is compounded by disclosure requirements, buyer hesitancy, and potential insurance complications. Neighborhood aesthetics and visual character are also diminished when towers are placed near residences or community spaces.

Transparency in applications is equally critical.

In past cases, such as the contested 2633 South Bascom Avenue site in Campbell, applicants mischaracterized land uses in their filings (e.g., labeling a multi-family Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 205 of 280
residence as a “motel”). Such misrepresentations undermine public trust and highlight the need for independent verification of all key claims.

The City has authority under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (§332(c)(7)) to regulate siting based on zoning, aesthetics, property values, and land-use compatibility. While the Act prohibits cities from denying applications solely on RF health grounds if they meet FCC standards, it does not preempt reasonable local rules regarding setbacks, design, collocation, and neighborhood compatibility (FCC, 1996; US Code, 47 §332).

Additionally, under FCC rules and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), certain tower proposals require an Environmental Assessment (EA), particularly when they may affect historic preservation, community character, or cumulative RF exposure. (FCC NEPA Rules, 47 CFR §1.1307). Towers near schools, parks, or sensitive residential areas may meet this threshold.

In light of these concerns, I respectfully urge the City to adopt the following measures in the permanent ordinance:
<!--[if !supportLists]-->1.
<!--[endif]-->Setbacks: Require a minimum 500-meter
(1,640-foot) buffer for new freestanding towers from homes, schools, parks, and health facilities, unless collocation and less-intrusive alternatives are proven infeasible.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->2.
<!--[endif]-->Independent verification: Mandate
third-party review of application claims (land use, distances, RF modeling), funded by the applicant through fees or deposits.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->3.
<!--[endif]-->Property-value disclosure: Require
applicants to provide an independent appraisal or real-estate market impact study when siting towers near residences.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->4.
<!--[endif]-->Design standards: Prioritize stealth
designs and collocation in commercial/industrial zones, consistent with the principle of “least intrusive means.”
<!--[if !supportLists]-->5.
<!--[endif]-->Public participation: Require robust
notice (at least 30 days in advance) to property owners within 1,000 feet of a proposed site and ensure a public hearing process.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->6.
<!--[endif]-->Monitoring and compliance: Require
post-construction RF compliance testing and periodic re-certification to ensure ongoing adherence to FCC limits.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->7.
<!--[endif]-->Temporary moratorium: Adopt a 6–12
month moratorium on new freestanding towers in residential zones while the Municipal Code is updated, as other cities have successfully done (e.g., Los Altos, San Bruno).

Conclusion
By grounding these rules in aesthetics, land-use compatibility, property values, and Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 206 of 280
transparency, areas where local governments retain clear authority Campbell can create a legally defensible, forward-thinking ordinance that protects both infrastructure needs and neighborhood integrity.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns and for your continued service to our community.
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->
Sincerely,
Tatyana Moiseyeva
2140 Vizcayca Cir, Campbell, CA 95008
[email protected]
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->
References / Citations (for staff and Council)
WHO/IARC. (2011). IARC classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).

ICNIRP. (2020). Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Physics, 118(5).

FCC. (1996). A Local Government Official’s Guide to Transmitting Antenna RF Emission Safety.
47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7) — Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Additional International Scientific Sources
NIH Literature Review (2022):

Documents health concerns such as RF sickness and cancer within 300–500 m of towers. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35843283/
Aalto University (2020):

Reviews limitations of U.S. regulatory approach and links non-thermal RF effects to neuropsychiatric symptoms.
https://research.aalto.fi/files/40738889/Limiting_Liability_with_Positioning_to_M.pdf Environmental Health News (2024):

German study showing chromosomal changes in residents near towers.

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 207 of 280
https://www.ehn.org/cell-phone-tower-chromosomes
Building Biology Institute Factsheet:

Advocates for strong residential RF avoidance guidelines. https://buildingbiologyinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/EMR_Factsheet_v2.0r.pdf Physicians for Safe Technology (PST):

Supports rigorous review of health risks and demands for safer siting practices. https://mdsafetech.org/advocacy/
Selected U.S.-Based Public Health and Property Impact
References
New Hampshire Commission on 5G Health and Environment (2020):

Recommended minimum 500-meter setbacks for wireless towers in residential areas. https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rfs/Reports/2020_Final_Report_of_the_Comm_on_5G.pdf Environmental Health Trust (EHT):

Aggregates peer-reviewed studies and federal reports on wireless health impacts and zoning best practices.
https://ehtrust.org/cell-towers-and-cell-antennae/compilation-of-research-studies-on-celltower-radiation-and-health/ Bond & Wang (2005), Appraisal Journal:

Showed that homes within 1,000 feet of a cell tower experienced property value declines of 10–20%.
https://appraisalinstitute.org/assets/1/7/TAJ_Spring05.pdf American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Policy Statement:

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 208 of 280
Calls for reevaluation of RF safety limits due to greater vulnerability of children to EMR. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2012/10/15/peds.2012-2850.full.pdf U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) Report on RF Emissions (2012):

Cited lack of recent comprehensive safety studies and called on FCC to revisit outdated exposure standards.
https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-12-771.pdf
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 209 of 280
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 210 of 280
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 211 of 280
1 Stephen Rose
From: samiksha sinku <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2026 7:20 PM
To: Stephen Rose
Cc: Andrea Sanders
Subject: Cell Tower Ordinance (In The Works)
Attachments: Wireless_Tower_Letter_Campbell_Complete_October_22_2025.pdf Hi Stephen,
I’m writing to share feedback regarding the proposed cell tower ordinance. The memories of last year’s Bascom tower proposal remain vivid in our community.

Health concerns, potential impacts on property values, and overall quality of life continue to be significant issues with lasting consequences. The Bascom proposal, which was ultimately rejected, raised deep concern that the business interests of a single individual or family were being prioritized over those of 100's if not 1000's of nearby residents within a 500-meter radius. Even nearby commercial property owners had not been properly informed.

During the prior hearing, the misrepresentation of a neighboring apartment complex as a “motel” in order to justify a 75-foot wireless tower shocked many in our community. We believe that individuals who knowingly misstate facts or mislead the public to obtain permits should not be permitted to submit further applications.

Thank you again for providing the opportunity to voice our continued concerns. Please let us know if there are any public hearings pertaining to the cell tower ordinance. So that the community has time to share their feedback. Attached is a list of recommendations for the cell tower ordinance.

Please acknowledge reception.

Kind regards,
Samiksha Sinku
803 Cambrian Dr, Campbell Ca, 95008.

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 212 of 280
Feedback on Interim Wireless Ordinance &
Concerns About Residential Tower Siting
To the attention of Stephen Rose, Planning Staff for Campbell, Ca Thank you for adopting the interim wireless ordinance as part of the City’s efforts to update Chapter 21.42 of the Municipal Code. I appreciate Campbell’s proactive approach to balancing infrastructure needs with community safety and neighborhood character.

However, I remain deeply concerned about the construction of freestanding wireless towers in or near residential neighborhoods (i.e., homes, apartments, townhomes, schools, and elder-care facilities, nursing facilities). These areas include families with children, elderly residents, and individuals with compromised immune systems. While the long-term health effects of radiofrequency (RF) exposure continue to be studied, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the World Health Organization, has classified RF electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) (WHO/IARC, 2011). The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) also updated its exposure guidelines in 2020, recognizing the need for stricter technical protections (ICNIRP, 2020). In line with international practice, several European countries (including France and Germany) recommend precautionary siting distances, particularly for facilities near schools and residences.

Economic and quality-of-life concerns must also be taken seriously. Research has found that the presence of large wireless towers can reduce nearby property values. For example, peer-reviewed studies have documented measurable price reductions of between 2–9% in markets where towers are sited near homes (Bond & Wang, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2005; Gibbons & Machin, Economic Journal, 2005; Savvopoulos et al., International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 2024). This is compounded by disclosure requirements, buyer hesitancy, and potential insurance complications. Neighborhood aesthetics and visual character are also diminished when towers are placed near residences or community spaces.

Transparency in applications is equally critical. In past cases, such as the contested 2633 South Bascom Avenue site in Campbell, applicants mischaracterized land uses in their filings (e.g., labeling a multi-family residence as a “motel”). Such misrepresentations undermine public trust and highlight the need for independent verification of all key claims.

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 213 of 280
The City has authority under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (§332(c)(7)) to regulate siting based on zoning, aesthetics, property values, and land-use compatibility. While the Act prohibits cities from denying applications solely on RF health grounds if they meet FCC standards, it does not preempt reasonable local rules regarding setbacks, design, collocation, and neighborhood compatibility (FCC, 1996; US Code, 47 §332).

Additionally, under FCC rules and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), certain tower proposals require an Environmental Assessment (EA), particularly when they may affect historic preservation, community character, or cumulative RF exposure. (FCC NEPA Rules, 47 CFR §1.1307). Towers near schools, parks, or sensitive residential areas may meet this threshold.

In light of these concerns, I respectfully urge the City to adopt the following measures in permanent ordinance:

1. Setbacks: Require a minimum 500-meter (1,640-foot) buffer for new freestanding towers from homes, schools, parks, and health facilities, unless collocation and less-intrusive alternatives are proven infeasible.

2. Independent verification: Mandate third-party review of application claims (land use, distances, RF modeling), funded by the applicant through fees or deposits.

3. Property-value disclosure: Require applicants to provide an independent appraisal or real-estate market impact study when sitting in towers near residences.

4. Design standards: Prioritize stealth designs and collocation in commercial/industrial zones, consistent with the principle of “least intrusive means.”

5. Public participation: Require robust notice (at least 30 days in advance) to property owners within 1,000 feet of a proposed site and ensure a public hearing process.

6. Monitoring and compliance: Require post-construction RF compliance testing and periodic re-certification to ensure ongoing adherence to FCC limits.

7. Temporary moratorium: Adopt a 6–12 month moratorium on new freestanding towers in residential zones while the Municipal Code is updated, as other cities have successfully done (e.g., Los Altos, San Bruno).

We understand that there are federal guidelines. However, federal preemption does not limit the City’s zoning authority to regulate the placement, design, aesthetics, and land-use compatibility of wireless infrastructure. The City can still Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 214 of 280
uphold its duty to protect public welfare by enforcing robust local setbacks, prioritizing industrial zones over residential siting, and requesting evidence of technical necessity and site analysis for each proposed location.

Moreover, credible scientific and real estate studies, can inform future ordinance revisions, justify a temporary moratorium, or support the development of one.

In addition, proposals which are within city limits bordering another city must factor in and involve the neighboring city and it’s residences in the planning process.

Conclusion
By grounding these rules in aesthetics, land-use compatibility, property values, and transparency, areas where local governments retain clear authority Campbell can create a legally defensible, forward-thinking ordinance that protects both infrastructure needs and neighborhood integrity.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns and for your continued service to our community.

Sincerely,
Name : Sylvie Kadivar
Address: 2155 Vizcaya Circle, Campbell Ca. 95008
Email : [email protected]
References / Citations (for staff and Council)
• WHO/IARC. (2011). IARC classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).
• ICNIRP. (2020). Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Physics, 118(5).
• FCC. (1996). A Local Government Official’s Guide to Transmitting Antenna RF Emission Safety.
• 47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7) — Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 215 of 280
Additional International Scientific Sources
NIH Literature Review (2022):

Documents health concerns such as RF sickness and cancer within 300–500 m of towers. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35843283/
Aalto University (2020):

Reviews limitations of U.S. regulatory approach and links non-thermal RF effects to neuropsychiatric symptoms.
https://research.aalto.fi/files/40738889/Limiting_Liability_with_Positioning_to_M.pdf Environmental Health News (2024):

German study showing chromosomal changes in residents near towers. https://www.ehn.org/cell-phone-tower-chromosomes
Building Biology Institute Factsheet:

Advocates for strong residential RF avoidance guidelines. https://buildingbiologyinstitute.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/04/EMR_Factsheet_v2.0r.pdf Physicians for Safe Technology (PST):

Supports rigorous review of health risks and demands for safer siting practices. https://mdsafetech.org/advocacy/
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 216 of 280
Selected U.S.-Based Public Health and Property
Impact References
New Hampshire Commission on 5G Health and Environment (2020):

Recommended minimum 500-meter setbacks for wireless towers in residential areas. https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rfs/Reports/2020_Final_Report_of_the_Comm_on_5G.pd f
Environmental Health Trust (EHT):

Aggregates peer-reviewed studies and federal reports on wireless health impacts and zoning best practices.
https://ehtrust.org/cell-towers-and-cell-antennae/compilation-of-research-studies-oncell-tower-radiation-and-health/ Bond & Wang (2005), Appraisal Journal:

Showed that homes within 1,000 feet of a cell tower experienced property value declines of 10–20%.
https://appraisalinstitute.org/assets/1/7/TAJ_Spring05.pdf American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Policy Statement:

Calls for reevaluation of RF safety limits due to greater vulnerability of children to EMR. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2012/10/15/peds.2012- 2850.full.pdf
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) Report on RF Emissions (2012):

Cited lack of recent comprehensive safety studies and called on FCC to revisit outdated exposure standards.
https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-12-771.pdf
Item 8.3
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 217 of 280
City Council Report
DATE: June 2, 2026
TITLE: Approval and Award of a New Janitorial Service Contract for City Owned Buildings (City Hall, Lower Police Annex, Police Operations Building, Historical Fire House Museum, Ainsley House, Carriage House, 2nd Street Garage and the City Service Center) (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council adopt a resolution: 1) approving and awarding the contract for the janitorial services to the Impec Group, LLC in an amount not to exceed $264,445 for city owned buildings (City Hall, Lower Police Annex, Police Operations Building, Historical Fire House Museum, Ainsley House, Carriage House, 2nd Street Garage and the City Service Center); and 2) authorizing the City Manager to execute said contract as specified in Campbell Municipal Code Section 3.20.100 for a period of one year plus the option to include up to five (5) additional one (1) year extensions for a total of six (6) years.

BACKGROUND
Janitorial service ensures that our city-owned buildings are clean and visually appealing and professional. A clean environment reduces stress among employees and creates a welcoming atmosphere for visitors, as well as enhance productivity. High touch point environments like restrooms, kitchens, and common areas are hotspots for bacteria and viruses. Janitorial services for all City facilities are provided by outside contractors to keep these high areas clean and disinfecting where appropriate. The Department of Public Works, Building Maintenance Division manages two separate contracts for these services.

The first contract, for services at the Campbell Community Center, Heritage Theatre and City Park Restrooms, were executed by City Council in 2022, and can be extended for additional one-year term until 2027 year.

The second contract, for janitorial services at City Hall, Lower Police Annex, Historical Fire House Museum, Ainsley House, Carriage House, 2nd Street Garage and the City Service Center, will expire June 30, 2026. A new contract is necessary beginning July 1, 2026, to continue service to these city facilities and also to add janitorial service for the new Police Operations Building.

DISCUSSION
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 218 of 280

On May 1, 2026, the City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for janitorial services that evaluates the quality of service and pricing to achieve the best value to the City. A total of 2 proposals were received. The evaluation panel consisting of Public Works, Recreation and Police Department staff reviewed the proposals. The Impec Group, LLC was found to be the most qualified for the work. The contract is structured as a multiyear contract, allowing additional years of service beyond the first year for up to five (5) one-year term contingent on satisfactory contract performance and at the option of the City.

The attached Resolution has been prepared for City Council to: 1) approve and award the contract with Impec Group, LLC for a not to exceed amount of $264,445; and 2) authorize the City Manager to execute the said janitorial services contract as specified in Campbell Municipal Code Section 3.20.100 for an initial one-year term plus the option to include up to five (5) additional one (1) year extensions for a total of six (6) years.

Each additional one-year extension would be authorized to increase the contract amount, adjusted per the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area as of the month of May of that year.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for janitorial services is provided for in the Building Maintenance Operational Budget.

ALTERNATIVES
Do not award and approve the contract and direct staff to pursue an alternate service delivery model.

PREPARED BY: Ron Taormina, Public Works Superintendent
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 219 of 280

Report Approval Details
Document Title: Report - Approval and Award of a New Janitorial Service Contract for City Owned Buildings.docx
Attachments: RESOLUTION for janitorial contract FY27 final.pdf Signed contract by vendor 2026-05-11.pdf
Final Approval
Date:

May 27, 2026
This document and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 220 of 280
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL

APPROVING AND AWARDING OF THE CONTRACT FOR JANITORIAL

SERVICES FOR CITY OWNED BUILDINGS (CITY HALL, LOWER POLICE

ANNEX, POLICE OPERATIONS BUILDING, HISTORICAL FIRE HOUSE MUSEUM, AINSLEY HOUSE, CARRIAGE HOUSE, 2ND STREET GARAGE

AND THE CITY SERVICE CENTER)
WHEREAS, the current contract for janitorial services for the City Hall, Lower Police Annex, Historical Fire House Museum, Ainsley House, Carriage House, 2nd Street Garage and City Service Center will expire on June 30, 2026; and WHEREAS, janitorial services for all City facilities are provided by contractual service providers; and
WHEREAS, janitorial service ensures that our city-owned buildings are clean and visually appealing and professional; and
WHEREAS, the new janitorial contract also covers the addition of the new Police Operations Building; and
WHEREAS, janitorial services for all city facilities are evaluated using a Request for Proposal process that evaluates the quality of service, as well as pricing, and awards the contract to the contractor providing the best value to the City; and WHEREAS, the Impec Group, LLC was found to be the most qualified for the work; and WHEREAS, the contract is structured as a multi-year contract, allowing additional years of service beyond the first year for up to five, one-year term contingent on satisfactory contract performance and at the option of the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Campbell does hereby award and approve contract for janitorial services to Impec Group, LLC for City Hall, Police Operations Building, Historical Fire House Museum, Ainsley House, Carriage House, 2nd Street Parking Garage and the Service Center in an amount not to exceed $264,445; and authorize the City Manager to execute the service contract for a period of one (1) year with options to renew annually for up to a total of six (6) years.

Each additional one-year extension would be authorized to increase the contract amount, adjusted per the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area as of the month of May of that year.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ______2026 by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 221 of 280
ABSENT: Councilmembers:

APPROVED:
___________________________________
Daniel E. Furtado, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 222 of 280
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 223 of 280
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 224 of 280
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 225 of 280
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 226 of 280
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 227 of 280
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 228 of 280
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 229 of 280
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 230 of 280
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 231 of 280
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 232 of 280
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 233 of 280
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 234 of 280
Item 9.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 235 of 280
City Council Report
DATE: June 2, 2026
TITLE: Fiscal Year 2027 Budget and CIP Introduction
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council review the Proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Operating Budget and 2027 - 2031 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) as presented; provide direction to staff to proceed with finalizing the budget; and establish June 16, 2026 as the date for a public hearing and adoption of the FY 2027 Operating Budget and CIP, as well as the Gann Appropriations Limit.

BACKGROUND
The Proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Operating Budget and 2027 - 2031 Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) has been posted on the City’s website at https://www.ci.campbell.ca.us/151/Budget. Also posted at this location is the complete First Update of the Seven-Year Financial Forecast which covers FY 2027 through FY 2033. The purpose of this agenda item is to formally introduce the Proposed Operating Budget and CIP to the City Council and the public and to obtain feedback and direction prior to the scheduled adoption on June 16, 2026. Any feedback or direction received by a majority of the City Council will be incorporated in the final budget document.

DISCUSSION
For ease of viewing, staff has also attached to this report the City Manager’s Transmittal Letter (Attachment 1). Additionally, based on Council feedback at the May 5 Budget Study Session, staff has also made some revisions to Service Objectives (Attachment 2) to take into account Council input. Once finalized, Service Objectives will be built into future budget documents and processes; with the first set of data and results to be presented to Council in the Spring of 2027. Staff is pleased to provide the proposed draft of the Proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Operating Budget and 2027 - 2031 Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).

FISCAL IMPACT
Complete fiscal impacts are provided with the City Manager’s Transmittal Letter and the Budget and CIP documents.

PREPARED BY: Will Fuentes, Finance Director
Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 236 of 280

Report Approval Details
Document Title: Report - Fiscal Year 2027 Budget and CIP Introduction.docx Attachments: FY 2027 City Manager Transmittal Letter (INTRO 06-02-26) FINAL.docx
Revised Service Objectives (06-02-26).docx
Final Approval
Date:

May 27, 2026
This document and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Will Fuentes, Finance Director
Andrea Sanders, City Clerk
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 237 of 280

June 2, 2026
Honorable Mayor, Vice-Mayor, and City Councilmembers:

I am pleased to introduce to you the Proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Operating Budget and 2027 - 2031 Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The Operating Budget and CIP serve as a policy document, a financial plan, a communication's device, and an operation’s guide; reflecting the policies, goals, programs, and service priorities and values of the City Council and the Campbell community. Specifically, the current budget and CIP process continues to emphasize a Priority-Based Budgeting approach to link City resources with the strategic priorities of the City Council and community, while also seeking to maintain fiscal prudence. This process started at the March 5 Special Meeting, in which the City Council discussed the organizations’ FY 2027 priorities shown as Exhibit A and later adopted them at the March 24 Regular Meeting. Those meetings were then followed up by the May 5 Budget Study Session, in which Council provided staff input and direction on the items below:
• FY 2027 Preliminary Workplans
• FY 2027 Preliminary General Fund Operating Budget
• 2027 – 2031 Preliminary CIP
• Revised Performance Measures / Service Objectives
Based on City Council input and direction staff has prepared the FY 2027 Proposed Workplans shown as Exhibit B as well as the Proposed Budget and CIP. The budget development process though continues to be an iterative process and there will be additional opportunities for Council feedback as well as community input on June 2 (Budget Introduction) and June 16 (Budget Adoption). Any further Council feedback that reaches majority consensus at the June 2 Budget Introduction will be incorporated into the June 16 Budget Adoption if it is fiscally feasible. This transmittal letter is intended to provide a highlevel overview of the proposed budget and CIP, by addressing the following items:
• A – Financial Summary
• B – Economic Update and Outlook
• C – Long-Range Forecast
• D – Budget Awards
• E – Next Steps
• F – Conclusions and Acknowledgements
• Exhibit A - FY 2027 Adopted City Council Priorities
• Exhibit B – FY 2027 Proposed Workplans

A - FINANCIAL SUMMARY
General Fund – Financial Summary
Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 238 of 280
Table 1 – General Fund Summary
For a more detailed Fund Balance Report, please see the Fund Summaries section of the Budget book Currently Proposed FY 2027 Operating and Capital expenditures for the General Fund equal $74.1 million. This proposal results in General Fund expenditures being fully balanced against estimated General Fund revenues in FY 2027. The General Fund, expenditures for FY 2027 show a 5.6% increase when compared to FY 2026 Year-End Estimates of $70.2 million. General Fund revenues for FY 2027 also show a 5.6% increase when compared to FY 2026 Year-End Estimates of $70.2 million. The proposed budget includes the following items and assumptions:
• All current City operations remain largely status quo, but FY 2027 budget requests account for inflation, contractually agreed to increases to vendors, and other costs to meet high priority Workplan objectives.
• No inclusion as of yet of Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLAs) for any bargaining unit or employee, with all Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) expiring either June 30, 2026 (CMEA, CPCEA, CARP, Confidential, MGMT, UNREP) or December 30, 2026 (CPOA). All MOUs are currently under negotiations. However, should Council have interest in providing salary adjustments, such adjustments may cost between $1 and $2 million depending on percentage (%) and effective dates. • No increases as of yet to City’s Healthcare Contribution Levels for 2027 for any bargaining unit or employee, with all MOUs again expiring either June 30, 2026 or December 30, 2026. The City Council could direct staff to include some level of assumed calendar year 2027 City healthcare contribution increase for the June 2 Budget Introduction and/or June 16 Budget Adoption versions. Such adjustments may cost between $100,000 and $200,000 depending on percentage (%). • No permanent staffing additions and extensions. Given the City’s fiscal constraints, the FY 2027 Proposed Budget does not include any permanent staffing additions or extensions. However, several low-cost position reclassifications and upgrades which make operational sense have been included in the FY 2027 Proposed Budget. These include the reclassification of a currently vacant 0.75 PartTime Community Services Officers (CSO) to a 1.0 Full-Time CSO, the reclassification of a Museum Collections Coordinator to a Recreation Program Coordinator, the Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 239 of 280
reclassification on a vacant Engineering Tech to a Jr. Engineer, the reclassification of a Streets Maintenance Supervisor to a Streets and Fleets Maintenance Supervisor with added supervisory duties, the reclassification of an Equipment Maintenance Supervisor to a Lead Mechanic, and upgrading the CSO salary rates and job specification to better align with current and future operational needs. Such reclassifications have an estimated cost impact of $90,000 in FY 2027.

Additionally, the FY 2027 Proposed Budget removes the Limited-Term Environmental Programs Specialist in the Community Development Department effective June 30, 2026 at an estimated savings of $138,400 and transitions the Limited-Term Sr. Public Works Project Manager to a permanent position after December 30, 2026 to help with ongoing capital projects at an estimated annual cost of $233,500.
• No Use of Measure K Sales Tax Revenues in FY 2027 unless litigation is resolved with a favorable, final, and non-appealable outcome to the City. As detailed in several public meetings and distributed material over 2024 as well as official ballot language, Measure K was estimated to generate $7 million annually in new general purpose sales tax revenue (starting April 1, 2025). Such additional revenue could potentially be used to stabilize and support ongoing City services and operational costs as well as address deferred maintenance, infrastructure, replenishment of reserves spent down during the pandemic, and unfunded liability needs so as to ensure long-term fiscal stability for the City. The ½ cent Measure K sales tax rate went into effect as approved April 1, 2025 and has generated $6.7 million through March 31, 2026 (representing one full year of receipts), plus an estimated $270,000 in interest earnings; bringing total funds close to initial estimates of $7 million annually.

Nevertheless, all funds collected to date and any interest earned have been placed by government statute into an interest-bearing escrow account and remain untouched until a non-appealable decision is reached in the case. If the City receives a favorable final decision, it will have full access to use accumulated Measure K funds and interest placed into escrow as well as ongoing future Measure K revenues. If the City receives an unfavorable final decision, it will return all accumulated Measure K funds and interest to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA). • Increased annual payment of approximately $630,000 to the CalPERS retirement system for the City’s required contribution towards its unfunded actuarial liability (UAL). While normal retirement premium payments for current employees are expected to decrease over time as Classic Tier One employees are replaced by Classic Tier Two or PEPRA Tier Three employees, the City’s UAL will continue to increase as CalPERS ramps up incorporation of large 20%+ investment losses by the retirement pool during the pandemic as well as a gradual lowering of the discount rate. Both of these items were expected and discussed during the November 21, 2023 Study Session. Thus, one of staff’s FY 2027 Proposed Workplan items continues to be developing policies and plans to pay down the City’s UAL and reduce overall pension costs over time. Such policies and plans will require adequate funding and until each are developed, funded, and implemented, the City will continue to be negatively impacted by unfunded pension liabilities. • $115,600 increase in annual General Liability and Property Insurance premiums charged by the City’s risk sharing pool (PLAN JPA) due to continued, albeit diminishing cost increases in the insurance market nationwide. The City participates in Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 240 of 280
PLAN JPA with 28 other municipalities located in the San Francisco Bay Area and this allows each jurisdiction to pool their risk and liability and develop cost effective programs and coverage layers to mitigate and protect against those liabilities. Despite best efforts, costs have risen dramatically for the JPA the past several years and this is again indicative of the insurance market in general and not necessarily any Campbell related claims settled. It is unlikely that the City would be able to insure itself cheaper if it were to obtain insurance coverage on its own since the size of the JPA gives it significant purchasing power in the insurance market • Increased annual payment of $377,400 (3.23%) to Santa Clara County Fire District (SCCFD) to pay for contractual fire services. Such increases are set by contractual formula each year (established July 1, 2018 and effective until June 30, 2028) and factor in the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), change in Firefighter/Engineer compensation, and change in Assessed Property Valuations within Campbell. Each carries a weight of 50%, 25%, and 25%, respectively, and the total fire services contract shall increase by no less than 2% and no more than 5% annually.
• $3.4 million in interfund operating transfers out to support operations in other funds; including $1.7 million to support the Lighting and Landscaping District Fund, $100,000 to support the SLESF Fund, $815,000 to support the IT Fund, and $767,000 to pay for 2016 Lease Revenue Bond (LRB) debt service.
• $2.5 million in interfund capital transfers out to support Capital Improvement Plan Reserve (CIPR) projects; with $1.0 million set aside as the General Fund’s annual CIPR contribution towards new projects and $1.5 million for carryover CIPR projects previously approved.
• $75,000 in interfund capital transfers out to support Construction Tax projects; with the entire amount proposed to be offset by a drawdown of Construction Tax reserves,
Incorporation of several short-term corrective budget strategies on the expenditure side which will be discussed below.

Related General Fund revenue sources also total $74.1 million and include:
• $202,000 in interfund operating transfers in to support General Fund operations; including a normal $146,000 transfer from the Community Facilities District (CFD) #1 fund to support Police and Fire services, $6,000 from the CFD #2 fund to support Land Development, and $50,000 from the Motor Vehicle Pool fund to support Administrative and Fiscal Oversight of the division.
• $1.5 million draw from the accumulated CIPR funds to support $1.5 million in carryover CIPR projects previously approved.
• $75,000 draw from Construction Tax reserve to support capital projects as previously discussed.

Short-Term Corrective Budget Strategies
The following section details short-term corrective strategies included within the FY 2027 Proposed Budget prior to the May 5 Budget Study Session. All strategies continue to be recommended by staff, with added detail provided as appropriate:

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 241 of 280
• Temporary Hiring Freeze - While the City’s list of vacant positions can change quickly based on regular turnover, filling of positions, and employee departures or retirements, as of this data, the City has 27 vacant positions with an estimated cost of $4.66 million in FY 2027. Since salary and benefits costs are the City’s largest expenditure category, similar to FY 2026, staff again proposes a temporary hiring freeze of various durations in FY 2027 as shown in Table 2 below for certain vacant positions not currently under recruitment or pending a placement offer; subject to City Manager discretion on critical positions that may have highly adverse operational, safety, fiscal, or other impacts to the City if not filled. Some would be frozen until January 1 or July 1, 2027, but some are recommended to be filled sooner due to the nature of their role and the services they provide the City. Such a hiring freeze saves the City approximately $1.11 million (across all City funds); with such savings already incorporated into the FY 2027 Proposed Budget:

Table 2 – Vacant Positions
Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 242 of 280
This action will slow some Workplan initiatives and reduce operational capacity, but it is a fiscally prudent measure given the financial challenges the City faces. Should additional funding be available within FY 2027, due to a positive and final non-appealable outcome on the Measure K litigation, unexpected increases in current City revenue sources, or unexpected decreases in planned City expenditures, the hiring freeze will be revisited.
• Limited to No Use of Temporary Staffing in FY 2027 – Similar to FY 2026, staff is again proposing limited to no use of temporary staffing in FY 2027 and this is already incorporated into the FY 2027 Proposed Budget. Due to previous hiring freezes, delayed recruitments, operational needs, and high-priority Workplan items, the City Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 243 of 280
previously utilized the services of temporary employees in various departments that come from staffing agencies and other professional services firms, but due to fiscal challenges, the City largely discontinued this practice in FY 2026 with exceptions being in some critical City service areas. In FY 2025 alone, these costs were estimated to reach $605,000. Given the potential of an ongoing temporary hiring freeze for permanent staffing and the City’s ongoing fiscal constraints, limiting the use of temporary staffing in FY 2027 would again be a consistent and appropriate action. However, this action will also slow some Workplan initiatives and reduce operational capacity.

At the May 5 Budget Study Session staff presented Council with an estimated $2.99 million structural operating deficit within the FY 2027 Preliminary General Fund Operating Budget.

However, based on Council feedback at the May 5 Budget Study Session, staff has now incorporated the Utilization of Available General Fund Reserves to close the remaining General Fund gap in FY 2027. After several minor adjustments since the May 5 Budget Study Session, the FY 2027 General Fund operating deficit was reduced to $2.79 million, and this is the amount staff proposes to draw from available General Fund reserves in FY 2027.

As shown in staff report presenting the FY 2025 ACFR, The General Fund’s fund balance at fiscal year-end was $26.4 million. Nonspendable fund balance at year end was $0.2 million, reserved for leases and prepaid costs. Restricted fund balance at year end was $1.7 million, comprised solely of Measure K sales tax receipts and accrued interest. Committed and Assigned fund balances at year end were $3.6 million and $2.9 million, respectively.

These balances are utilized to fund operational costs such as capital projects, compensated absences, and to maintain a reserve for PERS and OPEB related costs. An Unassigned fund balance of $18.0 million serves as an additional reserve for unanticipated needs that may arise including a $9.5 million reserve for economic fluctuations and $3.2 million for emergencies.

For Fiscal Year 2025, the City did not need to draw upon its economic fluctuation or emergency reserve. Although both the economic fluctuation and emergency reserves are below targeted levels, the City continues to maintain strong General Fund reserve balances.

The GFOA recommends, at a minimum, a General Fund unrestricted fund balance of no less than two months (or 16.67%) of General Fund operating expenditures. At the end of FY 2025, the City maintained an unassigned reserve ratio of 26.65% in the General Fund. Thus, given reserves above GFOA best practice levels, staff again recommends using up to $2.79 million to balance the remaining deficit in General Fund for FY 2027. If used at this level, the unassigned reserve ratio could drop to 22.53% but still be above GFOA best practice of

16.67%. Further uses for bargaining unit adjustments could lower this further, but staff only recommends doing so to a point that does not go below GFOA best practice. Additionally, should the City receive a favorable final outcome on Measure K, staff recommends using accumulated Measure K funds in escrow to pay back General Fund reserves used in FY 2027 in full.

All City Funds – Financial Summary
Table 3 – All Funds Summary
Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 244 of 280
For a more detailed Fund Balance Report, please see the Fund Summaries section of the Budget book Currently Proposed FY 2027 Operating and Capital expenditures across all City funds equal $107.3 million and include:
• $3.6 million in interfund operating transfers out to support operations, • $7.9 million in interfund capital transfers out to support capital projects, • $2.6 million in scheduled Measure O debt service payments, and • All items referenced within the General Fund section of this report.

Related revenue sources total $103.7 million and include:
• $3.6 million in interfund operating transfers in to support operations, • $7.9 million in interfund capital transfers in to support capital projects, and • All items referenced within the General Fund section of this report.

This results in an annual deficit of approximately $3.6 million across all City funds. However, this deficit is largely due to grant funded projects which receive reimbursement after expenditures have been incurred, further spend down of Measure O bond proceeds as both the Public Safety building and Library projects near completion.

In summary, across all City funds, expenditures for FY 2027 show a 26.5% decrease when compared to FY 2026 Year-End Estimates of $145.9 million. This decrease is largely due to most Measure O bond proceeds being spent in FY 2025 and FY 2026 to complete the associated Library and Police building projects. Operating Expenses though only show a

3.7% decrease when compared to FY 2026 Year-End Estimates of $96.9 million. Conversely, across all City funds, revenues for FY 2027 show a 6.3% decrease when compared to FY 2026 Year-End Estimates of $110.7 million. This decrease is largely due to slowed growth in several revenue categories and the full recognizing of grant and other misc. one-time revenue related to Measure O projects in FY 2025 and FY 2026.

General Fund and Citywide revenue estimates and proposed expenditures by type and department are shown in the Fund Summaries and Departments sections of the Budget Book.

And for more information on the assumptions used to estimate key revenues and other significant items of note, please see the Funding Sources sections of the Budget Book.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 245 of 280

B - ECONOMIC UPDATE AND OUTLOOK
National Economy
The U.S. economy continues to display resilience in the face of challenges, with growth moderating during late 2025 due to the federal government shutdown but rebounding modestly in early 2026. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the third estimate for Q1 2026 shows real GDP rising at an annual rate of 1.2%, up from the 0.7% recorded in Q4 2025. For the 12-month period ending in March 2026, GDP growth stands at 2.3%. Consumer spending remains the backbone of growth, bolstered by private investment and a notable uptick in service sector activity.

Inflation remains contained: April 2026’s Consumer Price Index rose 0.2% month-over-month and 2.1% year-over-year, marking a slight deceleration from previous months. The labor market continues to show signs of cooling, with nonfarm payrolls declining by 42,000 in April 2026 and the unemployment rate rising to 4.5%. Wage growth has slowed, but job openings remain elevated in healthcare and technology. Consumer confidence rebounded slightly in May, with the University of Michigan index at 56.3, reflecting improved sentiment following easing global tensions and lower gas prices.

Manufacturing momentum persists: the ISM Manufacturing PMI for April 2026 registered

52.7, indicating continued expansion. New orders and production strengthened, although employment remains soft. Housing continues its gradual recovery, with existing-home sales up 2.0% month-over-month in April to a 4.18 million annualized rate. The median price nationally reached $401,000 (+0.5% year-over-year). AI-driven investment and digital transformation remain key themes supporting longer-term optimism.

California Economy
California’s economy remains a national leader, but faces persistent challenges in unemployment and housing affordability. Q1 2026 state GDP grew at an annualized rate of

3.8% (latest BEA release), with the information and biotech sectors driving gains. The statewide unemployment rate edged up to 5.7% in April 2026, reflecting ongoing softness in construction and professional services. Job growth was strongest in education/health and leisure/hospitality.

Housing activity is robust but price growth has slowed. The median existing single-family home price declined further to $845,500 in April 2026 (–0.6% year-over-year). Sales volume expanded by 3% and building permits for new units totaled 108,400 year-to-date (+1.2% yearover-year). California’s tech sector remains strong, but the state is watching for potential impacts from federal policy on energy costs and investment due to international developments.

Santa Clara County Economy
Santa Clara County (Silicon Valley) continues to outperform the state and nation, thanks to its dominant technology sector. The unemployment rate for the San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara MSA was 4.1% in April 2026, holding near historic lows and well below California’s average. Regional employment has stabilized, with tech and professional services leading job gains. Housing markets remain competitive, with strong demand keeping prices elevated.

Ongoing innovation and investment in artificial intelligence and clean energy position the county well for sustained moderate growth.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 246 of 280
City of Campbell Economy
Campbell’s economy is tightly linked to Santa Clara County’s tech ecosystem and maintains a stable outlook with high asset values. As of April 2026, Redfin reports a median home sale price of $1.725 million (–11.2% year-over-year), while Zillow averages $1.979 million (+2.2% year-over-year). Homes are selling in approximately 19 days, faster than earlier in the year, and sales volume increased to 24 transactions (+14% year-over-year). Campbell’s fiscal health remains strong, but local officials remain vigilant regarding potential budget pressures and shifts in federal energy policy.

As of May 2026, Campbell’s unemployment rate stands at 3.8% (EDD preliminary estimate), down from 4.0% in April 2026 and notably lower than the 4.3% recorded in May 2025. This improvement reflects the city’s robust employment landscape, especially in technology and professional services, and outpaces both statewide and national averages. The decrease from the prior month signals ongoing recovery and resilience, while the year-over-year decline underscores Campbell’s strong local job market.

C - LONG-RANGE FORECAST
The First Update of the Seven-Year Financial Forecast is shown and discussed in more detail in a separate section of this Budget book called “Long-Range Financial Forecast”. The forecast is meant to assist Council and staff in determining whether current expenditure decisions made in FY 2027 can be supported long-term over through FY 2033. While all budgetary requests can be supported by the General Fund and short-term corrective actions in FY 2027, based on staff’s initial analysis and reasonable growth projections in expenditure and revenues, the out years could be a challenge given the City’s structural deficit issues absent significant ongoing expenditure and service reductions, new revenue sources, and/or a positive legal outcome on the Measure K Sales Tax measure.

D - BUDGET AND FINANCIAL AWARDS
For the 33rd consecutive year, the City's FY 2026 budget received national recognition by earning the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) “Distinguished Budget Award.” To receive the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award, a city must publish a budget document that serves as a policy document, a financial plan, a communications device, and an operations guide. We believe the FY 2027 budget conforms to GFOA program requirements. Additionally, FY 2026 is the 28th year an award of “Excellence in Budgeting” has been received from the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO). Copies of both awards appear in the Budget “Reference Materials” section of this document. It also should be noted that the City’s Annual Financial Report has also been an award-winning document for excellence in financial reporting at both the State and national levels for many years.

E - NEXT STEPS
• June 16: Adoption of Operating Budget, CIP, and Gann Limit

F - CONCLUSION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The development of the Proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Operating Budget and 2027 - 2031 FiveYear Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) was made possible through the knowledge and contribution of the City’s employees, input and support from our community, and direction of the City Council.

Despite the economic pressures of the past few years, the City has done well to preserve core Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 247 of 280
services, but as the budget and CIP before you demonstrate, the City continues to face significant fiscal challenges in the short- and long-term and remains cautious, conservative, and strategic in our operational growth to ensure long-term fiscal resilience.

I wish to thank everyone who participated in the budget process this year including the City Council and members of the Executive Team. Finally, I would like to recognize the staff within the Finance Department for their dedication and hard work that went into coordinating, developing, and publishing this budget document.

Respectfully submitted,
Brian Loventhal
City Manager

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 248 of 280
Exhibit A
FY 2027 Adopted City Council Priorities
Strategic
Objectives Council Priorities Comments by Council Members Long-Term Land Use
Planning and
Housing
Councilmember Anne Bybee
• Public hearing noticing should be done
with discretion when exceeding legal
requirements on larger projects
Councilmember Terry Hines
• Support discussions on Housing
Commission and the role of Planning
Commission and Civic Improvement
Commission
Councilmember Sergio Lopez
• Be strategic about resources needed to
meet State mandates i.e. zoning, permit
processing, storm water and ADA
requirements
Mayor Dan Furtado
• Support WV homeless efforts
Shared Feedback
• Support for receiving more information
on responsible construction ordinance
Land Use
City Infrastructure Councilmember Terry Hines
• Consider traffic calming policy
• Consider sidewalk improvements
on Bascom and Curtner
Financial Health
Financial Stability Councilmember Anne Bybee
• Successfully navigate Measure K
litigation
Councilmember Terry Hines
• Consider Community Facility District #1
assessments
• Continue to look for grants to support
existing City projects
Councilmember Elliot Scozzola
• Support investment policy to prohibit
war related investments
Councilmember Sergio Lopez
Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 249 of 280
Strategic
Objectives Council Priorities Comments by Council Members • Support implementation of Econ. Dev.

Plan and consider appropriate funding
Mayor Dan Furtado
• Support the vacation of the percolation
pond by SCVWD at the Sunnyoaks Fire
Station
Shared Feedback
• Work with All labor groups on new
MOU’s and ensure adequate
funding is available
• Econ. Dev. Initiatives are important
to economic vitality
Environment
Sustainability
Community
Community Health
and Safety
Councilmember Anne Bybee
• Consider consistency of
Commission/Committee livestreaming
Councilmember Terry Hines
• Support the Veterans Memorial
foundation efforts to celebrate 250 years
Councilmember Elliot Scozzola
• Consider policies related to immigration
• Support rent control policy
• Support policy related to lobbyists
Councilmember Sergio Lopez
• Noted Council previously by majority
vote agreed to agendize Immigration
policy discussion later this fiscal year
Vice-Mayor Dan Furtado
• Support Emergency Operations
Planning
• Consider website improvements to ease
navigation
• Consider ebike/scooter policies
• Support expanded public outreach and
communication

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 250 of 280
Exhibit B
FY 2027 Proposed Workplans
City Manager’s Office
CM Administration
• Provide staff support for all City Council members [Operational Need] • Provide staff support for Legislative Subcommittee to coordinate tracking of state legislation (that may impact City) with Legislative Subcommittee [Operational Need] • Provide staff support to the Civic Improvement Commission [Operational Need] • Coordinate, plan, and provide staff support for the State of the City event, All Hands Meetings, Volunteers’ Luncheon, Employee Holiday Luncheon [Operational Need] • Lead labor negotiations with CMEA, CPCEA, CPOA and CARP for bargaining agreements expiring at end of FY 2026 and continue to provide guidance and support for other labor related issues arising outside of labor negotiations [Council Priority - Financial Stability]
• Work with Liebert Cassidy Whitmore and RTGR Law to provide guidance and support for complex employee related claims [Operational Need]
• Staff CALGOVEBA Board of Trustee meetings with Wagner Law Groups, NWPS, and Bernstein Financial Group [Operational Need]
• Support City Council initiatives through new and updated City Council Policies • Promote City Council initiatives through various forms of media [Operational Need] • In coordination with Legal Services, Finance and outside counsel, provide guidance in the representation of the City in the Measure K litigation LEAD DEPARTMENT – CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE [Council Priority - Financial Stability] • Lead the recruitment effort to hire and onboard an in-house City Attorney [Operational Need]
Measure O
• Provide overall coordination of Measure O Police, Library, and related projects in collaboration with Public Works Department LEAD DEPARTMENTS -City Manager’s Office [Council Priority – City Infrastructure] • Provide support to the Measure O Citizens’ Oversight Committee [Council Priority – City Infrastructure]
Human Resources
• Continue recruitment and retention efforts to attract and retain City staff in budgeted positions [Operational Need]
• Work with Liebert Cassidy Whitmore on meet and confer items with CMEA, CPCEA, CPOA, Confidential, MGMT, and CARP [Operational Need]
• Coordinate and implement City training for employee development to strengthen both technical and soft skills and encourage continued growth of staff. [Operational Need] • Review, update, and recommend personnel policies, practices, and forms to ensure they meet the needs of the City and are compliant with current legislation. [Operational Need]
Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 251 of 280
• Plan and implement an internal communications strategy for employee-related topics to create a consistent and helpful resource for staff to refer to. [Operational Need] • In coordination with Community Development, establish a technical training plan for permit center and building inspection staff as required by state law. LEAD DEPARTMENT – City Manager’s Office/HR [Operational Need] Information Technology
• In collaboration with the Finance Department and Human Resources (HR) Division as well as other key stakeholders, complete the implementation, testing, and training for a new Human Resources Information and Payroll System LEAD DEPARTMENTS – HR and Finance [Council Priority – Financial Stability] • Provide IT consultation regarding Measure O projects [Council Priority – City Infrastructure]
• Camera Deployments throughout the City in collaboration with the Police Department and Public Works [Operational Need]
• Replace 25% of antiquated desktop computers. [Operational Need] • Continue public meeting recording and management [Operational Need] • Upgrades related to DOJ mandates in Police (NIBRS) [Operational Need] • Collaborate with Public Works to replace the Water Tower lights and system. [Operational Need]
• Refresh the technology-specific components of our disaster recovery strategy to address recent architectural changes and mitigate emerging technical risks. [Operational Need]
• Implementation of a comprehensive Mobile Device Management (MDM) framework across the City’s remote hardware inventory to ensure centralized oversight and security. [Operational Need]
• Formulate standardized AI usage guidelines and architect data-driven workflows to streamline internal operations. [Operational Need]
Economic Development
• Advance implementation of the City’s 2024 Economic Development Plan through targeted business outreach, retention visits, broker engagement, new marketing materials, and better internal coordination. [Council Priority - Financial Stability] • Strengthen/position the Dell/McGlincy area as a key employment and industrial district via business engagement, addressing barriers, and increasing the visibility of its assets and benefits to the community. [Council Priority- Financial Stability] • Facilitate small business support and connection through technical assistance, workshops, and occasional networking opportunities. [Council Priority- Financial Stability]
• Enhance Downtown Campbell’s weekday and overall vibrancy by supporting officeleasing efforts, addressing high-visibility vacancies, working with the Downtown Campbell Business Association, and continued stakeholder discussions around a Business Improvement District. [Council Priority- Financial Stability] • Advance commercial permit streamlining efforts by identifying and addressing barriers that impact leasing and reinvestment. [Council Priority- Financial Stability] Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 252 of 280
City Clerk's Office
• Continue a comprehensive evaluation of current records management practices and develop updated Records Retention Schedules, policies, and procedures for managing physical and electronic documents. Provide recommendations to improve efficiency, compliance, and lifecycle management, ensuring effective organization, access, and timely disposal of City records. [Operational Need] • Administer the 2026 General Municipal Election for three City Council seats in Districts 3, 4, and 5 by coordinating candidate nomination processes, ensuring compliance with all legal requirements, managing election logistics in partnership with the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters, and conducting post-election certification and reporting. [Operational Need]
• Begin process improvements and Escribe System implementation for Boards and Commissions [Operational Need]
Community Development
Administration
• Implement upgrades to the permit tracking system to create better reporting for tracking performance metrics. [Operational Need]
• Explore and pilot Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools to support Department operations and improve Customer Service. [Operational Need]
Policy Development
• Finalize Citywide Climate Action Plan [Council Priority – Sustainability] • In coordination with the Public Works Department, continue preparation of Hamilton Avenue Precise Plan [Council Priority – Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
• Support the Public Works Department in continued preparation of a Citywide Multimodal plan with bicycle and pedestrian improvements [Council Priority – LongTerm Land Use Planning and Housing] • Potential preparation of a Transit Oriented Alternative Plan for Implementation of SB 79 with related updates to City ordinances and policies. [Council Priority – LongTerm Land Use Planning and Housing] Current Planning
• Implement annual code updates to comply with new state laws, address community issues (tobacco, wireless), and implement permit streamlining to meet the city’s economic development goals. [Council Priority – Long Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
• Pursuant to Council Direction, pursue development of a Demolition Control Ordinance and options on implementing Starter Home Projects. [Council Priority – Long Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 253 of 280
Building
• In coordination with HR, establish a technical training plan for permit center and building inspection staff as required by state law. LEAD DEPARTMENT – City Manager’s Office/HR [Operational Need]
• Complete integration of Code Enforcement with the Building Division processes to address violations. [Operational Need]
Housing Assistance
• Implement BMR Housing program improvements as identified in Housing Program audit in association with Housing Element implementation [Council Priority – LongTerm Land Use Planning and Housing] • Develop policies and procedures for the use of Housing Trust Fund to support housing development and programs [Council Priority – Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
• Conduct outreach to increase community awareness of housing assistance programs available in Campbell [Council Priority – Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
• Pursue State and Federal funding to support affordable housing development and growth of the City’s Housing Trust Fund [Council Priority – Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
• Pursue programs and actions that preserve existing affordable housing units that will convert to market rate housing by 2027 [Council Priority – Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
• Pursue creation of a Task Force in partnership with other West Valley Cities to develop an implementation plan for the West Valley Homeless Services Feasibility Study [Council Priority – Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing] • Continue to implement Unhoused support programs including the hotel voucher program [Council Priority – Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing] • Develop procedures for implementing tenant protection requirements associated with housing demolition in conformance with State Law. [Council Priority – Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
• Continue work on establishing a potential Housing Commission [Council Priority – Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
Code Enforcement
• Evaluate and present to Council alternative options for implementation of the weed abatement program [Operational Need]
Finance
• In coordination with Legal Services, City Manager’s Office and outside counsel, provide support in the representation of the City in the Measure K litigation LEAD DEPARTMENT – CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE [Council Priority - Financial Stability]
Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 254 of 280
• Collaborate with City Council and City staff to craft spending plans if Measure K funds become available, and develop contingency plans in case the legal process is delayed or results in an unfavorable judgment. LEAD DEPARTMENTS – City Manager’s Office and Finance Department [Council Priority – Financial Stability] • In partnership with an outside consultant, perform a comprehensive cost allocation plan and user fee update. [Council Priority – Financial Stability] • Analyze and update current Reserve Policies and develop new Reserve Policies (e.g., Infrastructure/Deferred Maintenance Reserve, Technology Reserve, Equipment and Vehicle Reserve, etc.) where necessary to ensure long-term fiscal stability; discussing with and receiving input from the Finance Subcommittee and the City Council as appropriate over the course of the development process. [Council Priority – Financial Stability]
• Prepare balanced budgets that offer options for meeting Council priorities, sustaining services, and managing employee compensation through reserves, targeted cuts, vacancy freezes, and other strategies. [Council Priority – Financial Stability] • Using results of completed facilities condition assessment, continue to collaborate with the Public Works and Recreation and Community Services Departments to prepare capital projects to address Citywide deferred maintenance issues in future Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) LEAD DEPARTMENT - Public Works [Council Priority – Financial Stability]
• Continue to develop strategies to systematically address Unfunded Pension Liabilities in the short- and long-term [Council Priority – Financial Stability] • Conduct a needs assessment for a modern Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) system with input from all departments, laying the groundwork for an RFP in FY 2028 and potential selection and implementation in FY 2029, pending funding. [Operational Need]
Legal Services
• Coordinate Measure K litigation with outside counsel [Council Priority – Financial Stability]
• Assist with City Attorney Transition [Operational Need] • Litigate Code Enforcement Receivership Case for 620 Harriet [Operational Need] • Litigate Drug Abatement Case for 1368 Theresa [Operational Need] • Review Community Development Department’s updates to the City’s Multifamily Residential Development and Design Standards (MFDDS) – [Council Priority – Long Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
• Review Community Development Department’s updates to the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance and Mills Act Program [Council Priority – Long Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
• Work with Community Development and Public Works to finish update of Subdivision Ordinance [Council Priority - Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing] • Provide support on implementation of Measure O [Council Priority – City Infrastructure]
• Assist City Clerk with revised records retention schedule and procedures [Operational Need]
• Assist Community Development with/review Citywide Climate Action Plan [Council Priority – Sustainability]
Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 255 of 280
• Review Hamilton Avenue Precise Plan [Council Priority – Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
• Review Community Development Department’s annual code updates to comply with new state laws [Operational Need]
• Review Community Development Department ordinances to implement State Laws (SB 10 & 684) addressing missing middle housing [Council Priority – Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
Police
• Recruit, hire, and retain high-quality personnel across all classifications, with a focused strategy on long-term retention, succession planning, and maintaining full staffing levels to meet service demands and future vacancies [Council Priority – Community Health and Safety]
• Advance public safety technology to enhance operational effectiveness and community safety, including continued expansion and integration of real-time capabilities, public safety camera systems, ALPR, AI-assisted tools, and ongoing optimization of CAD and Next Generation 911 systems [Council Priority – Community Health and Safety]
• Assist with Phase 2 implementation of the Measure O Project, including planning, coordination, and execution to ensure timely completion and alignment with operational needs [Council Priority – City Infrastructure / Community Health and Safety]
Public Works
Administration
• Manage construction closeout of the Measure O capital projects specifically the Police Operations Building; overseeing construction contracts and associated project budgets [Council Priority – City Infrastructure]
• Represent Campbell in long range regional transportation planning efforts - Envision Silicon Valley and Plan Bay Area 2050 process [Council Priority - Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
• Administer grant funds and associated reporting requirements [Council Priority – Financial Stability]
• Manage the preparation of the Citywide Multi-modal Transportation Plan [Council Priority – Community Health and Safety]
Transportation Engineering
• Review and consider revisions to the City’s Traffic Calming Policy [Council Priority – Community Health and Safety]
• Manage, design, and implement traffic calming improvements [Council Priority – Community Health and Safety]
• Manage, design, and implement bicycle and pedestrian enhancements and safety improvements [Council Priority - Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing] Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 256 of 280
• Manage Hamilton Avenue/State Route 17 Bicycle Overcrossing project initiation phase (design) Feasibility Study [Council Priority - Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
• Manage Comprehensive Traffic Safety Action Plan Project [Council Priority – Community Health and Safety]
• Finalize recommendations and complete report for the Citywide Quinquennial (FiveYear) Speed Zone Surveys Project [Council Priority – Community Health and Safety] (Resources – Internal Staff Time)
• Support the preparation of the Citywide Multi-Modal Plan [Operational Need] • Apply for and manage grant funds as provided through VTA and other granting agencies [Council Priority – Financial Stability]
Engineering
• Implement the Annual Street Maintenance Program [Council Priority – Financial Stability]
• Manage construction of the Hamilton Avenue Resurfacing project [Operational Need] • Manage and implement all other approved Capital Improvement Projects [Operational Need]
• Review applications and issue permits for wireless facilities/small-cell wireless projects in the public right-of-way [Operational Need]
• Review encroachment permit applications and issue permits for construction within the public right-of-way [Operational Need]
• Perform field inspections of construction operations within the public right-of-way [Operational Need]
Land Development
• Review development proposals for compliance with the reissued Storm Water Municipal Regional Permit (MRP 3.0), including necessary updates to the Green Infrastructure Plan [Council Priority – Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
• Review and approve land development projects for compliance with City policies adopted plans, and City standard plans and details, and identify associated improvements on public rights-of-way [Operational Need] • Support the Community Development Department in the preparation of the Hamilton Avenue Precise Plan / Public Improvement Plan [Operational Need] (Resources – Internal Staff Time)
• Support SCVURPP in the negotiations for the issuance of the updated Storm Water Municipal Regional Permit (MRP 4.0) [Council Priority – Long-Term Land Use Planning and Housing]
Maintenance
• Complete all approved Capital Improvement Projects for City facilities improvements including installation of new boiler for the Campbell Community Center Building A [Council Priority – Sustainability]
Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 257 of 280
• Complete preventative maintenance work in Maintenance Zones 9&12, including the removal and replacement of displaced sidewalks, curb and gutter and structural tree trimming in the public right-of-way [Council Priority – Community Health and Safety]
• Complete installation of 4 new Tesco Battery Backup Systems to have all 43 signalized intersections in the City to have battery backups [Council Priority – Community Health and Safety]
• Implement water conservation strategies including turf and irrigation controller upgrades for the Community Center and sports fields [Council Priority – Sustainability]
• Support volunteer events such as Keep America Beautiful and Campbell Garage Sale [Operational Need]
• Manage vehicle and equipment purchases and leasing agreements [Operational Need]
• Complete Annual Crack Seal Project [Operational Need] • Create a proposed schedule of repairs and replacements for City-owned assets as outlined in the City’s Asset Inventory Report [Council Priority – Financial Stability] Environmental
• Support the Community Development Department in the preparation of the Campbell Climate Action and Adaptation Plan by providing solid waste, stormwater, and water conservation expertise [Council Priority - Sustainability] • Coordinate and support efforts to implement the requirements of SB 1383 [Council Priority - Sustainability]
• Provide support to the Solid Waste Management Authority when implementing the new solid waste hauler agreement and associated requirements [Council Priority - Sustainability]
• Coordinate and support the Planning and Building Divisions with trash enclosure plan reviews, project waste management plans, and the implementation of the newly updated construction and demolition program [Council Priority - Sustainability] • Provide support to the West Valley Clean Water Authority when implementing the regional stormwater MRP 3.0 [Council Priority - Sustainability] • Coordinate and support the West Valley Clean Water Authority and Campbell Street Division with the installation of full trash capture devices for State Water Board compliance [Council Priority - Sustainability]
• Coordinate the implementation of the Climate Action Plan [Council Priority - Sustainability]
Measure O – City Manager’s Office
• Complete construction phase for both Police and Library buildings [Council Priority – City Infrastructure]
• Manage the construction contracts for both the Library and Police Building projects, including change order management and contract administration [Council Priority – City Infrastructure]
• Implement Civic Center site staging plan to accommodate City Hall customers and employee parking [Council Priority – City Infrastructure] Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 258 of 280
• Provide support to the Citizens’ Oversight Committee [Council Priority – City Infrastructure]
• Provide Civic Center off-site improvements such as the gravel lot and surrounding sidewalks, pending available funding [Council Priority – City Infrastructure] Recreation and Community Services
Administration
• Complete the relocation of the Adult Center and launch operations in the new facility with a seamless transition for participants and staff. Develop a centralized repository of local events and volunteer-based recreational opportunities in collaboration with [Council Priority – City Infrastructure]
• Support community engagement throughout the aquatics facility design process to ensure the final project reflects community needs, promotes accessibility and inclusivity, and builds strong public awareness and support in advance of construction. [Council Priority – City Infrastructure]
• Launch a Healthy Living Initiative focused on promoting nutrition education, encouraging active lifestyles and supporting overall community health through programs, workshops and events in partnership with other local groups. [Operational Need]
• Evaluate the feasibility and requirements of licensing the preschool program and identify the resources needed to support a high quality, compliant, and sustainable licensed program. [Operational Need]
• Implement and promote a city-wide Drug and Smoke Free Initiative through partnerships to create healthier, safer public park spaces and recreational environments. [Operational Need]
• Expand adaptive and therapeutic recreation programming by assessing community needs, increasing inclusive offerings, strengthening partnerships, and enhancing staff capacity to ensure equitable access for individuals of all abilities. [Operational Need] • Identify abilities. potential partnerships to expand and diversify program offerings, enhance resources and better meet the evolving recreational and wellness needs of the community. [Operational Need]
• Develop content for a historical reference exhibit for the new Campbell Library. [Operational Need]
• Partner with the community to re-establish the Parks and Recreation Foundation as a sustainable fundraising entity that generates resources to support programs, services and capital improvements across the parks and recreation system. [Council Priority – Financial Stability]
Museum
• Increase accessible searchable Museum collection records by 5% [Operational Need]
Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 259 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”

CITY MANAGER
510 – Administration
Advance the City’s priorities and protect local interests by actively tracking legislation and collaborating with the City Council Legislative Subcommittee to advocate on issues that impact the Campbell Community.
• In 2025, ## of advocacy actions were taken on behalf of the City, such as position letters, testimonies, or coordinated regional responses.

Foster civic engagement and expand educational and enrichment opportunities for youth and families by collaborating with the City Council Education Subcommittee, local schools, the Santa Clara County Library, and community partners. • In 2025, ## of collaborative meetings, programs, or initiatives were conducted with the Education Subcommittee and partner organizations.

Support a safe, resilient community by coordinating and implementing the City’s Emergency Operations Plan to ensure effective and timely emergency response. • In 2025, ## of hours of training were provided to staff assigned to Emergency Management Operations.

Ensure responsive and transparent City services by addressing resident concerns within 48 hours of receipt.
• In 2025, ## of resident concerns were directed to the City Manager’s Office and ## were responded to within 48 hours.

Support a collaborative, well-functioning organization by fostering transparency and a positive work culture through clear communication and shared direction. • In 2025, ## of city-wide meetings were organized with % of participation from employees.
511 – City Clerk
Ensure City Council business is conducted transparently by providing clear, timely public hearing notices that support meaningful community awareness and participation.
• In 2025, XX% of legal notifications were published on time.

Prepare and maintain City Council minutes, resolutions, and ordinances in a timely, organized and accessible manner and prepare accurate minutes to support effective implementation and clear public understanding of Council actions. • In 2025, XX% of City Council Meeting minutes, resolutions and ordinances were prepared for approval at the next regular Council Meeting.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 260 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”
Strengthen public trust and accountability by providing timely, respectful, and transparent access to public records, ensuring the community remains informed and engaged in City government.
• In 2025, ## of public records requests were received and responded to within the minimum number of days, while ## of public requests were filed for an extension to be completed.
515 – Human Resources
Work together with Department Heads, to ensures timely hiring of employees who meet the City’s service delivery needs. Efficient recruitment keeps essential services fully staffed and responsive, supporting safe, reliable, and high-quality service residents expect in a vibrant small-town community. • In 2025, ## of recruitments of ## of funded vacancies were completed Responsive HR services promote employee well-being, trust, and engagement, which directly contribute to a safe, innovative, and people-focused City. • In 2025, ## of employee inquiries were resolved in a timely manner.

Volunteerism is a cornerstone of a thriving small-town culture. By facilitating meaningful volunteer opportunities, HR helps foster civic pride, community connection, and shared responsibility which enhances programs that enrich residents’ quality of life.
• In 2025, HR supported ## of volunteer hours throughout the organization.

Ensure the timely completion of employee evaluations to promote clear expectations, professional growth, and accountability across the organization.

Regular feedback strengthens performance, engagement, and service excellence for the community.
• In 2025, % of employee evaluations were completed on time. 516 - Worker’s Compensation Self-Insurance
Promptly responding to worker’s compensation claims, supports employees during times of need while maintaining fiscal responsibility. Timely claim management helps ensure employees can return to work safely and services to the community remain uninterrupted.
• In 2025, ## of worksers’ compensation claims were acknowledged and processes within established timelines.

Work to minimize recordable industrial injuries, to promote a safe and healthy work environment. Fewer injuries protect employee well-being, reduce service disruptions, and support reliable service delivery for the community. • In 2025, the City experience ## recordable industrial injuries.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 261 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”
Monitor work-related injuries and identify trends to proactively address risk and support continuous improvement in workplace safety. Using data to guide prevention efforts helps create a safer workplace and strengthens the City’s commitment to innovation and people-first practices.
• In 2025, injury trends were reviewed ## times and targeted safety prevention actions were implemented.
547 – Information Technology
Support efficient operations and consistent service delivery for the community by providing and maintaining core business applications. Reliable systems enable staff to work effectively and help ensure residents receive timely, high-quality services.
• In 2025, ## of core business applications were maintained and operable all year.

Timely technical support strengthens organizational effectiveness and supports uninterrupted service to the community.
• In 2025, ## of help desk requests were resolved.

Protect City computer systems and data by implementing best practices and meeting vulnerability compliance requirements. Strong cybersecurity safeguards public information, ensures continuity of services, and supports a safe and trustworthy organization.
• In 2025, ## of identified system vulnerabilities were identified and resolved.

Economic Development
Support a positive and resilient business environment by working collaboratively with local businesses.
• In 2025 this was accomplished through ## of outreach calls or meetings to brokers and businesses.

Strengthen the local economy by connecting businesses to City, regional, and partner resources and opportunities.
• In 2025, completed ## documented interactions connecting businesses to resources including site selection support; permitting guidance; economic/market analysis; interdepartmental/inter-agency problem-solving; or referrals to local, regional, or state partners.

Footnote: An “interaction” is a documented, significant engagement (meeting, call, or substantive email exchange.)
Support business retention by proactively engaging key employers and businesses at risk of relocation or closure.
• In 2025, completed ## retention-focused engagements addressing lease renewal, expansion planning, relocation, or operational challenges.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 262 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”
Enhance transparency and partnership by providing timely and relevant information to the business community. In 2025, delivered ## business-facing communications to local business audiences, including newsletters, targeted updates, business alerts, and presentations to business groups.

FINANCE
Deliver on community priorities by advancing Work Plan items that strengthen our safe, small-town feel and support a thriving, innovative environment. • This is accomplished by initiating or completing assigned Work Plan items within the fiscal year. In Fiscal Year 2025, XX% of workplan items were started or completed.

Support a well-run, responsive organization by processing invoices promptly to maintain strong vendor relationships and operational reliability. • This is accomplished by meeting all stated A/P invoice deadlines without incurring penalties. In 2025, XX% of invoices were processed on time.

Support strong financial stewardship and reliable City operations by ensuring Pcard (City Credit Card) activity is accurately reconciled and paid on time.

This is accomplished by reconciling, verifying, and processing monthly P-card (City Credit Card) statements within required deadlines and avoiding penalties. In 2025, XX% of statements met this standard.

Promote responsible stewardship of City resources by developing a balanced budget and CIP that supports a safe, vibrant community where people and innovation thrive.
• This is accomplished by preparing and adopting a balanced operating budget and fully funded CIP by June 30 each year. In Fiscal Year 2025, XX% of required budget and CIP components were adopted on time.

Uphold transparency and public trust by completing required financial reporting that supports accountable, well-managed City operations. • This is accomplished by finalizing the annual financial audit and submitting the ACFR to all required organizations by December 31 each year. In Fiscal Year 2025, XX% of required reports were completed and submitted on time.

Strengthen transparency and responsible financial management by ensuring all federally required reporting is completed accurately and on schedule.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 263 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”
• This is accomplished by preparing and submitting the Single Audit Report (when applicable) to the appropriate organizations by March 31 each year. In Fiscal Year 2025, XX% of required submissions were completed on time.

Maintain public trust and demonstrate strong financial stewardship by ensuring City financial statements are accurate, transparent, and compliant with all reporting standards.
• This is accomplished by preparing financial records and statements that meet all audit requirements, resulting in an unmodified/clean audit opinion. In Fiscal Year 2025, XX% of audit opinions received were unmodified.

Enhance accountability and continuous improvement by addressing recommendations from the annual audit to strengthen financial management and operations.
• This is accomplished by implementing all applicable audit management letter comments in a timely manner. In Fiscal Year 2025, XX% of audit recommendations were fully addressed.

Support efficient revenue collection and responsible financial management by ensuring timely billing of miscellaneous accounts receivable.

This is accomplished by generating all billings within 30 days of service or transaction. In 2025, XX% of billings were issued within this timeframe.

Promote operational efficiency and minimize rework by ensuring bi-weekly payroll is processed accurately and on schedule.
• This is accomplished by adhering to established payroll timelines and procedures.

In 2025, XX% of payrolls were processed on time without requiring corrections.

Support compliance and efficient use of resources by ensuring all State and Federal payroll reporting requirements are met accurately and on time. • This is accomplished by preparing and submitting all required payroll reports according to regulatory deadlines. In 2025, XX% of reports were completed accurately and on schedule.

Support the local business community and promote efficient City services by ensuring business license applications are processed promptly and completely. • This is accomplished by reviewing, approving, and issuing licenses within 30 days of submittal. In 2025, XX% of applications were processed within this timeframe and XX% of renewals were generated on schedule.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 264 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”
Promote responsible financial management and maximize public resources by ensuring idle funds are invested wisely to earn interest. • This is accomplished by placing available funds in interest-bearing investments according to City policies and market opportunities. In Fiscal Year 2025, XX% of idle funds were invested in interest-bearing accounts.

Ensure effective stewardship of public funds by achieving competitive returns on City investments.
• This is accomplished by managing the investment portfolio to meet or exceed the established benchmark rate. In Fiscal Year 2025, the City yielded XX% while the benchmark rate was XX%.

Promote accurate financial reporting and efficient use of staff time by ensuring timely reconciliation of bank statements to the general ledger. • This is accomplished by reconciling all bank statements to cash balances within ten working days of month-end close. In 2025, XX% of reconciliations were completed on time.

Promote transparency, accountability, and public trust by providing accessible online reporting of budget and financial information.
• This is accomplished by maintaining up-to-date, user-friendly online systems for public access to budget and financial reports. In Fiscal Year 2025, XX% of reports were posted accurately and made easily navigable.

Support efficient risk management and protect City resources by processing General Liability and Property Claims promptly and accurately. • This is accomplished by adhering to established process timelines and meeting all required statutory deadlines. In 2025, XX% of claims were processed within these timelines.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 265 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”

PUBLIC WORKS
715 - Environmental Services
Promote environmental sustainability and public health by implementing SB1383 to reduce short-lived climate pollutants and divert organic waste from landfills. • This is accomplished by following the requirements of SB1383, a California law passed in 2016, to increase the City’s organic and recyclable waste and decrease solid waste disposal. In 2025, the City diverted ## tons of organic waste and ## tons of recyclable waste, while solid waste disposal totaled ## tons.

Protect public health, habitat, and recreation of local waterways by proper treatment of stormwater runoff from public streets.

This is accomplished by implementing projects that treat stormwater before it reaches local creeks. In 2025, ## of private and public projects involved new construction in the public right-of-way and of those projects, ## were required to install stormwater treatment facilities. 720 - Transportation Engineering
Enhance community safety and support a walkable, accessible City by addressing potential pedestrian hazards and preventing injuries.
• This is accomplished by tracking the number of injury-related crashes involving pedestrians to guide the planning and implementation of safety improvement projects. In 2025, there were ## injury-related crashes involving pedestrians.

Enhance community safety and support active transportation by addressing potential bicyclist hazards and preventing injuries on City streets. • This is accomplished by tracking the number of injury-related crashes involving bicyclists to guide the planning and implementation of safety improvement projects. In 2025, there were ## injury-related crashes involving bicyclists.

Enhance safety on local and collector streets by addressing speeding concerns by evaluating various types of traffic conditions which could result in the development and installation of physical traffic calming measures.
• This is accomplished by engaging with the neighborhood by which residents can request traffic calming studies to verify and address various types of traffic conditions per the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program. In 2025, ## of traffic calming requests for studies were received and ## were studied and evaluated.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 266 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”
730 - Engineering
Ensure safe, durable, and well-maintained streets by maintaining the City’s pavement network at a high level of service.
• This is accomplished by monitoring the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and performing preventative maintenance as needed. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) considers a PCI of 70 as indicative of low distress requiring mostly preventative maintenance. In 2025, the City’s average network PCI was ##.

A PCI below 70 indicates significant pavement distress, requiring a combination of preventive maintenance and rehabilitation.

Promote responsible use of public funds and efficient project delivery by ensuring construction projects are completed within allocated funding. • This is accomplished by preparing Engineer’s Estimates for all construction projects to serve as benchmarks for bid evaluation. In 2025, ## of ## CIP construction projects were completed within budget.
740 - Land Development
Promote efficient, coordinated City services by supporting timely review of Planning Applications and providing Public Works input to Planning staff. • This is accomplished by reviewing all Planning Applications within ten (10) working days to enable comprehensive comments to applicants within the required 30 calendar days. In 2025, XX% of Planning Applications were reviewed within this timeframe.
750 - Vehicle and Equipment maintenance
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and build climate resiliency by converting the City’s fleet and large equipment to electric vehicles.
• This is accomplished by replacing conventional vehicles and equipment with electric alternatives to meet the City’s CAAP goal of converting 30% of the fleet to electric by 2030. In 2025, XX% of the fleet and large equipment had been converted to electric.

Ensure operational readiness and reliability of marked Public Safety vehicles to support a safe and desirable community for residents, workers, and visitors. • This is accomplished by maintaining vehicles proactively and replacing them as needed to minimize downtime. In 2025, X% of vehicles were fully operational, with X% scheduled for replacement due to reaching the end of their useful life or Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 267 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”
sustaining irreparable damage, ensuring the fleet continues to meet public safety needs.
760 - Street Maintenance
Promote safe, durable, and cost-effective road infrastructure by maintaining pavement conditions proactively.
• This is accomplished through regular preventive maintenance to extend the life of streets, reduce vehicle damage, and enhance safety for drivers and pedestrians.

In 2025, XX% of streets received scheduled maintenance or rehabilitation, and ## of potholes and minor street maintenance requests were received and ## were completed within five (5) working days.

Promote community safety, accessibility, and livable neighborhoods by maintaining sidewalks in good condition.
• This is accomplished through routine inspection, repair, and replacement of damaged sidewalks to ensure safe passage for all residents and visitors. In 2025, ## of sidewalk maintenance requests were received and ## were completed within fifteen (15) working days.
770 - Signals and Lighting Maintenance
Promote safe, efficient, and reliable movement of people and vehicles by proactively maintaining traffic signals and streetlight infrastructure. • This is accomplished through timely response and repair of signal and lighting issues. In 2025, ## of emergency callouts were received and ## were responded to within two (2) hours, and ## of non-emergency traffic signal malfunctions were received and ## were resolved within two (2) working days.

Promote safety, energy efficiency, and sustainability by maintaining street lights to be effective, properly directed, and long-lasting.
• This is accomplished through routine inspection, adjustment, and maintenance of street lighting. In 2025, ## of streetlight malfunctions were repaired within ten (10) working days.
775 - Parks Maintenance
Promote safety and positive recreational experiences by systematically inspecting playground equipment at City parks.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 268 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”
• This is accomplished through regular, scheduled inspections to identify and address hazards. In 2025, XX% of parks with playground equipment were inspected weekly.

Preserve Campbell’s urban forest, enhance streetscapes, and support climate action goals by replacing and planting trees along public right-of-way with appropriate species.
• This is accomplished through proactive tree maintenance and planting programs.

In 2025, ## of emergency tree limb trimming requests were received and ## were completed within 24 hours, and ## new trees were planted to support carbon dioxide mitigation and urban canopy growth.
780 - Building Maintenance
Maintain City building facilities to ensure public safety and health, preserve the City’s assets and value, and guarantee the functionality and efficiency of buildings for both public and private use.

This is accomplished through timely inspection, maintenance, and repair of building systems. In 2025, XX% of facility-related malfunctions were repaired within three (3) working days.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 269 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
550 - Administration
Surveying our customers supports responsive, high-quality services by helping the Department understand customer needs and improve operations. • This was accomplished in 2025 by sending a customer satisfaction survey to XX% of customers who obtained permits or approvals from the Department. • Customer Satisfaction Rating received from those surveys in 2025 was XX%. 551 - Current Planning
Timely review of Planning permits supports a vibrant, well-managed community by helping residents, businesses, and applicants move projects forward efficiently. • This was accomplished in 2025 by planning applications being reviewed and responded to on average within 30 days.
• This was accomplished in 2025 by planning applications being approved (or denied) by staff on average within 30 days of being deemed complete. • This was accomplished in 2025 by scheduling planning before the Planning Commission or Council on average within 90 days of being deemed complete. 552 – Comprehensive Planning
Timely implementation of the City’s General Plan supports a well-planned, vibrant community by guiding development, infrastructure, and services to meet the needs of residents, businesses, and visitors.
• In 2025 XX% of General Plan initiatives and projects assigned to the Community Development Department were completed within the scheduled timeframe. 552 - Building
Timely response to customers obtaining Building permits and inspections supports housing production and economic development by helping residents, businesses, and developers move projects forward efficiently and safely. • This was accomplished in 2025 by conducting inspections on average 1 day after the received request.
• This was accomplished in 2025 by reviewing and responding to building permits on average within 2 weeks of submittal.
• In 2025 the average time from building permit submittal to permit issuance was XX weeks.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 270 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”
• In 2025 XX% of inspections passed.
557 - Housing
Support a safe, compassionate, and inclusive community by connecting unhoused Campbell residents with essential services and housing resources, while ensuring the City’s below market rate housing program is effectively managed to maintain long-term affordability for local households.
• This was accomplished in 2025 by XX% of BMR rental and ownership households being confirmed in compliance during annual recertifications. • This was accomplished in 2025 by conducting street outreach to XX unhoused Campbell residents and providing referrals to basic services such as food, clothing, and transportation.
• This was accomplished in 2025 by providing case management services to XX unhoused Campbell residents, including referrals to appropriate housing services within 30 days.
• This was accomplished in 2025 by distributing XX basic-needs supplies, such as hygiene products, water, and snacks, to unhoused Campbell residents. 559 – Code Enforcement
Ensure safe, well-maintained neighborhoods by responding to code enforcement concerns promptly and resolving violations efficiently, supporting a healthy, livable community for all Campbell residents.
• This was accomplished in 2025 by having an average response time to complaints within 14 days.
• This was accomplished in 2025 by resolving code enforcement cases within an average of 60 days.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 271 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”

PUBLIC SAFETY
601 - Administration
Support a strong, well-prepared workforce by ensuring a fair, thorough, and efficient hiring and training process that reinforces professionalism, readiness, and high-quality service to the Campbell community.
• In 2025 ## of applications were received (listed per position). • In 2025 ## of applicant backgrounds were conducted.
• In 2025 ## of employees hired.
• In 2025 employees completed a total of ## hours of training. 602 - Communications
Support community safety by delivering fast, reliable, and professional emergency communications, working in partnership with the community to protect residents, businesses, and visitors during moments when timely, calm, and accurate response matters most.
• In 2025 XX% of incoming 9-1-1 calls were answered within 10 seconds. • In 2025 XX% of emergency calls for service were dispatched in less than 2 minutes.
• In 2025 there were ## of 9-1-1 calls per officer.
• In 2025 there were ## of radio transmissions
603 - Records
Support a safe, transparent, and well-informed community by maintaining accurate, accessible, public safety records, ensuring officers, partner agencies, and the public have timely access to information.
• In 2025 XX% of report requests were processed within 7 business days of receipt. • In 2025 XX% of warrants were processed and entered within 3 days of receipt • In 2025 ## of background checks were completed
• In 2025 ## of items of property and evidence were processed 604-Special Enforcement
Enhance public safety by proactively investigating crime and enforcing traffic laws in a way that reduces serious injury and fatal collisions, strengthens case outcomes, and supports a safe, vibrant community.
• In 2025 XX of new cases were assigned
• In 2025 XX cases were cleared
• In 2025 ## of traffic citations were issued
Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 272 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”
• In 2025 ## traffic collisions involving serious injury or fatality occurred 605-Field Services Division
Deliver responsive, professional police services by working alongside the community to address calls for service, resolve problems, and maintain a safe environment where people feel supported and protected.
• In 2025 XX% of emergency calls for service were responded to within 5 minutes • In 2025 XX% of non-emergency calls for service were responded to within 20 minutes
• In 2025 XX of calls for service were responded to
• In 2025 XX of arrests were made per officer
• In 2025 XX of reports were written per officer
610 – Santa Clara County Fire Department Service Contract Ensure high-quality, reliable fire and emergency medical services for the Campbell community through effective oversight of the Santa Clara County Fire Department contract, emphasizing accountability, service quality, and coordination to support a safe, small-town environment.
• In 2025 XX% of all fire related calls for service responded to within 7 minutes or less
• In 2025 there were XX fire incidents
• In 2025 there were XX fires (Structure, Vegetation, Other) • In 2025, there were XX Medical Calls

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 273 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”

RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES
524 – Administration
Ensure programs and services meet community needs and fosters a vibrant, engaged and healthy community.
• In 2025 XX of community members participated in an activity or received a service at the Campbell Community Center.

Maximize financial sustainability by reducing reliance on limited public funds while generating revenue to maintain and expand quality programs and services. • This is accomplished by generating revenue to cover all direct departmental costs and minimizing the impact to the general fund. In Fiscal Year 2025 the department utilized $305,890 of General Fund support.

Encourage broad community participation by removing barriers, fostering unity, celebration, and a sense of belonging for all residents. • This was accomplished in 2025 by offering XX number of low cost or free events for the community.
525 – Senior Nutrition
Address senior hunger and health by providing nutritious meals, fostering social connections, and supporting overall well-being in partnership with Santa Clara County.
• This was accomplished in 2025 by offering XXX number of meals to seniors in need.

Promote social interaction and reduce isolation, improving senior’s mental health, emotional well-being, and overall quality of life.
• This was accomplished in 2025 by offering XXX of social activities during senior nutrition.
526 – Adult Services
Ensure seniors of all abilities and backgrounds can easily participate, fostering inclusion, social connection, and improved well-being.
• This was accomplished in 2025 by offering XX different types of classes and XX number of events that are low cost or free to seniors in our community.

Provide personalized support to help older adults navigate healthcare, housing, and social services, promoting independence and improving their quality of life. • This is accomplished through the case management services offered at the Adult Center. In 2025 XXX of hours of case management services were provided and XXX community members were served.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 274 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”
Enhance program quality and capacity by bringing diverse skills and companionship, while fostering community connection and support for seniors. • This was accomplished by offering volunteer opportunities to older adults in our community. In 2025 XXX of volunteer hours were managed by Adult Services staff Support older adults in living independently and comfortably in their homes by promoting physical health, social connections, and overall well-being. • Adult Center participants are surveyed regularly and in 2025 XXX% of patrons reported improved well-being due to participation in programs offered through the Adult Center.
527 – Community Center
Provide flexible, affordable space for gatherings, events, and programs, helping to bring people together and support a community connection and local activities. • The Community Center is a vital hub for the community to gather and provides three main banquet spaces and in 2025 they were rented an average of 277 hours per week.

Ensure organized, safe, and consistent access to play spaces for youth and adult sports, supporting physical health, teamwork, and community engagement. • This was accomplished in 2025 with the athletic fields at the Community Center being rented an average of 58 hours per week March through November providing a balance of public and private use.

This was accomplished in 2025 with gymnasiums at the Community Center being rented an average of 120 hours per week.
528 – Historical Museum & Ainsley House
Preserve and share the community’s unique history and culture, fostering a sense of identity, pride, and lifelong learning for residents and visitors • This was accomplished by welcoming XXX visitors in 2025 to the Museum, Ainsley House, and related events, expanding access to the city’s rich cultural heritage.

Bring history to life for students through hands-on learning, helping them connect with the past and understand their community’s heritage in a meaningful way. • This was accomplished by engaging XXX school children in education programs during 2025, providing interactive experiences that deepened historical understanding and curiosity.

Encourage community engagement and learning by offering meaningful volunteer roles that help preserve local history and support the Museum and Ainsley House programs.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 275 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”
• This was accomplished by managing XXX volunteer hours in 2025, strengthening community involvement and expanding the Museum’s capacity to deliver quality programming.

Strengthen community identity and understanding by celebrating diverse cultures and local history, fostering pride and social cohesion. • This was accomplished by presenting XXX cultural and historical events in 2025, creating inclusive opportunities for community members to learn, connect, and celebrate together.
529 – Heritage Theatre
Foster community involvement and skill-building by providing opportunities for people to contribute, learn, and connect through meaningful roles in the arts. • This was accomplished by managing XXX volunteer hours in 2025, empowering community members to support theatre operations while developing skills and fostering shared appreciation for the performing arts.

Preserve and celebrate local culture while providing a space for community expression, arts, education, and live performances for all ages. • This was accomplished by hosting XXX events at the Heritage Theatre in 2025, providing an accessible, professional venue where local organizations could host events and celebrate the community’s cultural diversity. 531 – Sports, Aquatics, Skatepark
Provide accessible pool-based exercise that supports lifelong physical and mental health for adults of all ages through low-impact aquatic activities. • This was accomplished by providing inclusive water-based exercise opportunities (excluding swim lessons) to XXX of participants in 2025, promoting wellness, mobility, and community engagement.

Teach life-saving skills that reduce the risk of drowning and build confidence, safety, and physical fitness in and around water.
• This was accomplished by instructing XXX swim lesson participants in Summer 2025, equipping community members with essentials swimming and water safety skills.

Ensure children within the community have a chance to participate, promoting inclusivity, physical health, skill development, and lifelong love of sports. • This was accomplished by engaging XXX children in sports programs during 2025, supporting active lifestyles, teamwork, and personal growth through accessible youth athletics.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 276 of 280
Revised “Service Objectives”
532 – Pre-school, Day Camp, Enrichment, and Fitness
Provide safe, structured outdoor play environment where children can develop socially through teamwork, friendship-building, and group activities, while supporting working families during out-of-school months. • This was accomplished by engaging XXX participants in our summer camp program in Summer 2025, fostering social development, active play, and a supportive environment for families.

Provide early childhood development opportunities that promote learning, social skills, and school readiness, support families and strengthen the community’s future.
• This was accomplished by serving XXX children in preschool and toddler programs in 2025, equipping young learners with foundational skills for academic and social success.

Item 9.2
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 277 of 280
City Council Report
DATE: June 2, 2026
TITLE: Council Committee Reports
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council report on activities from their committee assignments.

MAYOR FURTADO
City Attorney Performance/Compensation Subcommittee
City Clerk Performance/Compensation Subcommittee
City Manager Performance/Compensation Subcommittee
Economic Development Subcommittee
Finance Subcommittee
Legislative Subcommittee
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG)
Cities Association of Santa Clara County - City Selection Committee Silicon Valley Regional Interoperability Authority**
West Valley Mayors and Managers
West Valley Sanitation District
US Mayor’s Water Council**
Valley Transportation Authority Policy Advisory Committee Campbell Historical Museum & Ainsley House Foundation (Alt.) Cities Association of Santa Clara County Board Representative (Alt.) Santa Clara County Emergency Operational Council (EOAC)** (Alt.) Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority Board (SVACA) (Alt.)

VICE MAYOR BYBEE
Education Subcommittee
Friends of the Heritage Theater Liaison
Legislative Subcommittee
City Attorney Performance/Compensation Subcommittee
City Clerk Performance/Compensation Subcommittee
City Manager Performance/Compensation Subcommittee
Campbell Historical Museum & Ainsley House Foundation Liaison Cities Association of Santa Clara County: Board Representative Santa Clara County Library District JPA Board of Directors Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority Board (SVACA)
Item 11.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 278 of 280

Cities Association of Santa Clara Legislative Action Committee Cities Association of Santa Clara County City Selection Committee (Alt.) Silicon Valley Clean Energy JPA Board of Directors (Alt.) West Valley Mayors and Managers (Alt.)

COUNCILMEMBER SCOZZOLA
Advisory Commissioner Appointment Interview Subcommittee

COUNCILMEMBER HINES
Advisory Commissioner Appointment Interview Subcommittee DCBA Liaison
Economic Development Subcommittee
League of California Cities Peninsula Division Housing, Community & Economic Development Committee**
San Jose Bristol Hotel Transitional Housing Community Advisory Committee** Santa Clara Valley Water District County Water Commission West Valley Solid Waste Management Authority JPA
West Valley Stormwater Authority
Silicon Valley Clean Energy JPA Board of Directors
Silicon Valley Clean Energy Finance and Administration Committee** Santa Clara County Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee (Alt.) West Valley Sanitation District (Alt.)
Valley Transportation Authority Policy Advisory Committee (Alt.)

COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ
Campbell Ministerial Interfaith Group
Finance Subcommittee
Education Subcommittee
League of California Peninsula Division Executive Committee** Santa Clara County Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors**
Association of Bay Area Governments (Alt.)
DCBA Liaison (Alt.)
Friends of the Heritage Theater Liaison (Alt.)
Santa Clara County Library District JPA Board of Directors (Alt.) Santa Clara Valley Water District County Water Commission (Alt) West Valley Solid Waste Management Authority JPA (Alt.) West Valley Stormwater Authority (Alt.)
**appointed by other agencies
Item 11.1
Tuesday, June 02, 2026 279 of 280

PREPARED BY: Kristen Epolite, Deputy City Clerk Item 11.1 Tuesday, June 02, 2026 280 of 280