Capitola City Council
September 28, 2023

City of Capitola
City Council Meeting Agenda
Thursday, September 28, 2023 – 6:00 PM
City Council Chambers
420 Capitola Avenue, Capitola, CA 95010
Mayor: Margaux Keiser
Vice Mayor: Kristen Brown
Council Members: Yvette Brooks, Joe Clarke, Alexander Pedersen Regular Meeting of the Capitola City Council – 6 PM
All correspondences received prior to 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding a Council Meeting will be distributed to Councilmembers to review prior to the meeting. Information submitted after 5 p.m. on that Wednesday may not have time to reach Councilmembers, nor be read by them prior to consideration of an item.

1. Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance
Council Members Yvette Brooks, Joe Clarke, Alexander Pedersen, Kristen Brown, and Mayor Margaux Keiser.

2. Additions and Deletions to the Agenda

3. Presentations
Presentations are limited to eight minutes.

A. Mayor's Proclamation - George Wightman
B. Presentation of Junior Guard Participant Recognition Awards C. Presentation from Visit Santa Cruz County
D. Grant Report from the National Alliance on Mental Illness, Santa Cruz County

4. Report on Closed Session

5. Additional Materials
Additional information submitted to the City after distribution of the agenda packet.

6. Oral Communications by Members of the Public
Please review the Notice of Remote Access for instructions. Oral Communications allows time for members of the Public to address the City Council on any “Consent Item” on tonight’s agenda, or on any topic within the jurisdiction of the City that is not on the “General Government/Public Hearings” section of the Agenda. Members of the public may speak for up to three minutes, unless otherwise specified by the Mayor. Individuals may not speak more than once during Oral Communications. All speakers must address the entire legislative body and will not be permitted to engage in dialogue. A maximum of 30 minutes is set aside for Oral Communications.

7. Staff / City Council Comments
Comments are limited to three minutes.
1 City Council Meeting Agenda – September 28, 2023
City of Capitola Page 2

8. Consent Items
All items listed as “Consent Items” will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the time the Council votes on the action unless members of the City Council request specific items to be discussed for separate review. Items pulled for separate discussion will be considered following General Government. Note that all Ordinances which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

A. City Council Meeting Minutes
Recommended Action: Approve minutes from the regular meeting on September 14, 2023.

B. Purchasing and Procurement Policy and Ordinance
Recommended Action: Adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 3.16 of the Capitola Municipal Code pertaining to Purchasing and Purchasing Contracts; and adopt revised Administrative Policy III-4: Purchasing and Procurement Policy.

C. Completion of the Kennedy Drive Sidewalk Project
Recommended Action: 1) Accept as complete the Kennedy Drive Sidewalk Project as constructed by Diamond D Concrete; 2) authorize the City Clerk to file and record a Notice of Completion; and 3) authorize the release of the contract retention of $8,560 as prescribed in the contract.

D. Noble Gulch Culvert Condition Assessment
Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc. for the Noble Gulch Culvert Condition Assessment in the amount of $29,950.

9. General Government / Public Hearings
All items listed in “General Government / Public Hearings” are intended to provide an opportunity for public discussion of each item listed. The following procedure pertains to each General Government item: 1) Staff explanation; 2) Council questions; 3) Public comment; 4) Council deliberation; 5) Decision.

A. Universally Accessible Playground at Jade Street Park Naming Recommended Action: Select a playground name for the Universally Accessible Playground at Jade Street Park.

B. Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
Recommended Action: Provide direction to staff regarding short-term and long-term options for improving traffic safety at the intersection of Bay Avenue and Hill Street.

C. City Council Appointments to City Advisory Bodies
Recommended Action: Appoint members of the public to the City of Capitola Commission on the Environment.

10. Adjournment
_____________________________________________________
Notice of In-Person & Remote Access
Meetings are open to the public for in-person attendance at the Capitola City Council Chambers located at 420 Capitola Avenue, Capitola, California, 95010 Other ways to Watch:

Spectrum Cable Television channel 8
2 City Council Meeting Agenda – September 28, 2023
City of Capitola Page 3
City of Capitola, California YouTube Channel
To Join Zoom Application or Call in to Zoom:

Meeting
link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83328173113?pwd=aVRwcWN3RU03Zzc2dkNpQzRWVXAydz09 Or dial one of these phone numbers: 1 (669) 900 6833, 1 (408) 638 0968, 1 (346) 248 7799 Meeting ID: 833 2817 3113
Meeting Passcode: 678550
To make a remote public comment:

Via Zoom Application: Use participant option to “raise hand”. The moderator will unmute you Via Zoom phone call: Dial *9 on your phone to “raise your hand”. The moderator will unmute you Notice regarding City Council: The City Council meets on the 2nd and 4th Thursday of each month at 6:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 420 Capitola Avenue, Capitola.

Agenda and Agenda Packet Materials: The City Council Agenda and the complete Agenda Packet are available for review on the City’s website: www.cityofcapitola.org and at Capitola City Hall prior to the meeting. Agendas are also available at the Capitola Post Office located at 826 Bay Avenue Capitola.

Need more information? Contact the City Clerk’s office at 831-475-7300.

Agenda Materials Distributed after Distribution of the Agenda Packet: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5, materials related to an agenda item submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at the Reception Office at City Hall, 420 Capitola Avenue, Capitola, California, during normal business hours.

Americans with Disabilities Act: Disability-related aids or services are available to enable persons with a disability to participate in this meeting consistent with the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Assisted listening devices are available for individuals with hearing impairments at the meeting in the City Council Chambers. Should you require special accommodations to participate in the meeting due to a disability, please contact the City Clerk’s office at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting at 831-475-7300. In an effort to accommodate individuals with environmental sensitivities, attendees are requested to refrain from wearing perfumes and other scented products.

Televised Meetings: City Council meetings are cablecast “Live” on Charter Communications Cable TV Channel 8 and are recorded to be rebroadcasted at 8:00 a.m. on the Wednesday following the meetings and at 1:00 p.m. on Saturday following the first rebroadcast on Community Television of Santa Cruz County (Charter Channel 71 and Comcast Channel 25). Meetings are streamed “Live” on the City’s website at www.cityofcapitola.org by clicking on the Home Page link “Meeting Agendas/Videos.” Archived meetings can be viewed from the website at any time. 3 Capitola Junior Lifeguard
Appreciation
2023
4 Item 3 B.

Participants
❖ Impacted 1,022 children ranging from 6 -18 years old
❖ Personal Development
❖ Physical Training
❖ Competition
❖ Ocean Safety
❖ Emergency preparation
5 Item 3 B.

Session 1 Division Awards
Morning Little Guards
Best All Around Logan
Team Captain Genevieve
Best Sport Vera
Most Improved Ellis
6s PM
Best All Around Josie Hoffman
Best Sport Brady Hamilton
Team Captain Kanalu Miller
Most Improved Luca Mecozzi
7s Pm
Most Improved Theodore Lee
Best All-Around April Grant
Team Captain Wyatt Rogers
Best Sport Hunter Piro
8 year olds
Most Improved Lucy Darton
Best All-Around Luke Stumpf
Team Captain Mcoy Hollis
Best Sport Reagan Christenson
Cs pm
Best Sport Alexis Amsden
Best All-Around Hudson Fry
Team Captain Johnny Mayo
Most Improved Ayden Comment
Cs am
Most Improved Greyson Oates
Best all around Zander Brown
Team Captain Calvin Davis
Best Sport Ali Boles
Bs Awards
Most Improved Charlotte Sanchez
Best All Around Keira Burke
Team Captain Jack Davis
Best Sport Martin Cruz
As
Most Improved Hugo Baring
Best All Around Kate Brandon
Best Sport Cassidy Perry
Team Captain Rocco Giorgianni
6 Item 3 B.

Session 2 Division Awards
6’s - AM
Most Improved: Reagan Butka
Best Sport: Charlie Bonifacio
Team Captain: Nolan Morse
Best All Around: Maizy Jacoby
7’s - AM
Most Improved: Cici Robertson
Best Sport: Boaz Reynolds
Team Captain: Malloy Graves
Best All Around: Nadia Flandberg
8’s - AM
Most Improved: Luka Joedicke
Best Sport: Bonnie Bonifacio
Team Captain: Stevie Warren
Best All Around: Kaiea Miller
6’s - PM
Most Improved: Maya Vaughn
Best Sport: Shane Clet
Team Captain: Max Lewin
Best All Around: Sol Heier
7’s - PM
Most Improved: Jack Lamoureux
Best Sport: Ellie Geriguis
Team Captain: Mia Kokot
Best All Around: Frankie Schwirck
8’s - PM
Most Improved: Carmen Orona
Best Sport: Sonny Gammino
Team Captain: Cody Brookman
Best All Around: Adriana Cardoso
C’s - AM
Most Improved: Landon Alibrandi
Best Sport: Tessa Yao
Team Captain: Leila Beckett
Best All Around: Emmylou Hanson
C’s - PM
Most Improved: Xavier Burkett
Best Sport: Maya Gammino
Team Captain: Hugh Olson
Best All Around: Vivian
Chemontowski
C’s - PM
Most Improved: Xavier Burkett
Best Sport: Maya Gammino
Team Captain: Hugh Olson
Best All Around: Vivian
Chemontowski
B’s
Most Improved: Reghan Ditty
Best Sport: Ocean Cervine
Team Captain: Eden Findrick
Best All Around: Liam McLaughlin
A’s
Most Improved: Cyrus Candia
Best Sport: Jack Smith
Team Captain: Summer Shields
Best All Around: Mia Barton
AA’s
Most Improved: Bradley Schwarz
Team Captain: Averie Young
Best All Around: Chloe McGilvray
7 Item 3 B.

Beach Wide Awards
❖ Session 1 Ironwoman: Marria Talavera
❖ Session 2 Ironman: Zander Brown
❖ Dorrie Award: Bradley Schwarz
8 Item 3 B.
9 Item 3 B.

CAPITOLA UPDATE
Terence Concannon CATP
10 Item 3 C.

A NEW CEO
Over 24 years of experience in hospitality and tourism
Most recently President & CEO for Go Lake Havasu
Branded and independent hotels
Operations, sales & marketing, community engagement
Dedicated to Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
Tourism Geek
2 0 2 3 C A P I T O L A 2
11 Item 3 C.

A FRESH OUTLOOK

ENGAGEMENT WITH
Elected officials, county & city leadership
Stakeholder businesses & strategic partners
County and city chambers of commerce

COMMITMENT TO
All cities, communities and unincorporated areas
Attracting visitors: domestic & international
Improving the quality of life for all residents
2 0 2 3 C A P I T O L A 3
12 Item 3 C.

A RENEWED COMMITMENT

TO CAPITOLA
Work with chamber to educate and promote
Celebrate the assets of Capitola
Regular updates to City Council
Engagement with the community, stakeholders & the
Capitola & Wharf BIA
2 0 2 3 C A P I T O L A 4
13 Item 3 C.

RECENT CONTENT : SOCIAL MEDIA
2 0 2 3 C A P I T O L A 5
A Stroll Through Capitola Village
This ad was shared in two versions (A/B)
and received: • Over 4,069 link clicks
• 3,000 likes
• 302 comments
• 283 shares
• and reached over 183k accounts.
14 Item 3 C.

RECENT CONTENT : SOCIAL MEDIA
2 0 2 3 C A P I T O L A 6
Facebook Ad & Post: Capitola
Art & Wine Festival
Shared this event a week prior to the event
date, this post received • over 2,753 link clicks and • sparked 76 comments • and 261 shares. 15 Item 3 C.

RECENT CONTENT : SOCIAL MEDIA
2 0 2 3 C A P I T O L A 7
Facebook Ad & Post: 2023 Free
Summer Concerts & Movies
Capitola’s Twilight Concerts led the way
for the Free Summer Concerts & Movies
Facebook and Instagram ads, posts, reels
and stories for Summer 2023.

Here is one of the many ads/posts that
shared Capitola’s Twilight Concerts,
Sunday Art & Music at the Beach, Movies
at the Beach, and many other free
summer movies and music around Santa
Cruz County.
16 Item 3 C.

RECENT CONTENT : SOCIAL MEDIA
2 0 2 3 C A P I T O L A 8
Wharf Love
We have shared many posts
in the last few months
featuring the Capitola
Wharf.

Both scenic photos, and
information on the Capitola
Wharf Resiliency and Public
Access Improvement
Project
17 Item 3 C.

RECENT CONTENT : SOCIAL MEDIA
2 0 2 3 C A P I T O L A 9
Facebook Ads & Social Posts
with Capitola as the Hero Image
Dine Al Fresco: Top Patios in Santa Cruz
County is one of our most popular blogs.

The piece mentions Zelda’s, Paradise
Beach Grille, Margaritaville, Capitola Bar
and Grill Gayle’s Bakery, and
Shadowbrook.

Another Capitola Village hero shot is
often used for Dining with World-Class
Views which features several Capitola
Village restaurants, including
Shadowbrook.
18 Item 3 C.

RECENT CONTENT : VSCC BLOG
2 0 2 3 C A P I T O L A 1 0
Several blog stories, including:

Dining with World-Class Views
2023 Free Summer Movies & Concerts
Dine Al Fresco: Top 20+ Patios in Santa Cruz County
A Stroll Through Capitola Village
Other Recent Notable Capitola Features:

Capitola Rod & Custom Classic Car Show
Social posts/photography/video content. Posted to
Instagram and TikTok, as well as gathered content for
future event promotion
Capitola Art & Wine Festival
Posted to TikTok post, as well as gathered content for
future use of event promotion.
19 Item 3 C.

RECENT CONTENT : PHOTOGRAPHY
2 0 2 3 C A P I T O L A 1 1
January 12, 2023
The news and media left many to believe the
Capitola Village was inhabitable, “washed
away,” and closed for business indefinitely.

Our photographer Ben Ingram took these shots
that showed many businesses open and the
vibrancy of the Village still shining.

We posted several of the photos to social
media the same day.

The Capitola Village businesses were so
grateful for the promotion as many businesses
were eager to welcome back visitors and locals.
20 Item 3 C.

RECENT CONTENT : PHOTOGRAPHY
2 0 2 3 C A P I T O L A 1 2
April 2023
Our other talented photographer, Liz Birnbaum
captured images from Capitola, and she took
several outstanding shots, including the one
seen here.

Several of these photos have been used across
our website, in blogs, in social media posts, and
come 2024, in our annual calendar.
21 Item 3 C.
: SUCCESSFUL
2 0 2 3 C A P I T O L A 1 3

RESULTS
: EXPERIENTIAL
: INNOVATIVE
: EQUITABLE
: ACHIEVABLE
: REVENUE-FACING

RESULTS
22 Item 3 C.

THANK YOU.

Terence Concannon, CATP
2 0 2 3 C A P I T O L A 1 4
23 Item 3 C.
24 Item 3 D.

Mental Health Numbers
(before the pandemic)
1 in 5 adults lived with a mental health condition each year 1 in 6 youth lived with a mental health condition each year Tragically, suicide is now the second leading cause of death for young people (10-34)
25 Item 3 D.

What happened next?
COVID turned up the heat on a boiling pot
● Isolation
● Fear
● Grief/loss
Our teens are still struggling with anxiety, depression, sadness, and hopelessness ● 57% teen girls
● 70% LGBTQIA+ teens
26 Item 3 D.

Your important partnership helps to solve this problem
27 Item 3 D.

With your support, NAMISCC provided unique services to families:
● Education
○ Youth, adults, community learned about mental health and mental health conditions
● Reducing Stigma
○ So that people seek help
● Connecting people to resources
○ At NAMISCC or in the wider community
● Support
○ Compassionate support helped families find hope, healing, and community
28 Item 3 D.

FREE Programs for Families in English and Spanish
Served Over 13,000 County-wide
Support Groups
For those with mental
health conditions and
their loved ones
Presentations
For schools, facilities,
law enforcement, and
the community
Classes
For peers, families,
and providers
29 Item 3 D.
5796+
Youth, parents, school staff, and
youth-supporting adults learned about
mental health, received resources and
found support in caring for a youth with a
mental health condition.
6177+
Family members found community and
learned about mental health, mental
illness, and how to support an adult
loved-one with a mental health
condition.

In 22-23, County-wide:
30 Item 3 D.

Ending the
Silence
Mental health awareness
presentations for students,
school staff, and families.
● Normalize mental health
● Signs & symptoms
● When to seek help
● How to help a friend
31 Item 3 D.
300+
students and teachers at
Soquel High School participated
in Ending the Silence (ETS)
last school year!
As a result of ETS:
89% of students say they feel more
knowledgeable about the signs of
mental health conditions.
87% of students have an
understanding of how to seek help.
78+
students at Soquel High School
learned about important mental health
resources from NAMISCC at a
school-wide event!
32 Item 3 D.

NAMI
Help Lines
Spanish Help Line
(831) 205-7074
English Help Line
Resources & (831) 427-8020
Compassionate Support
33 Item 3 D.
“I have never felt so heard and
understood in this journey of parenting a
child who struggles so greatly with
mental illness. It feels incredibly
supportive and safe.”
- Jennie, a parent in NAMI SCC’s Support
Group for Parents
34 Item 3 D.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: September 28, 2023
From: City Manager Department
Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes
Recommended Action: Approve minutes from the regular meeting on September 14, 2023.

Background: Attached for Council review and approval are the draft minutes from the regular City Council meeting on September 14, 2023.

Attachments:

1. 9/14/2023 Minutes
Report Prepared By: Julia Moss, City Clerk
Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
35 Item 8 A.

City of Capitola
City Council Meeting Minutes
Thursday, September 14, 2023 – 6:00 PM
City Council Chambers
420 Capitola Avenue, Capitola, CA 95010
Mayor: Margaux Keiser
Vice Mayor: Kristen Brown
Council Members: Yvette Brooks, Joe Clarke, Alexander Pedersen Closed Session – 5:15 PM
i. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Gov. Code § 54956.9) Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: one case Regular Meeting of the Capitola City Council – 6 PM

1. Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance – The meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM. In attendance: Council Members Brooks, Clarke, Pedersen, Vice Mayor Brown, and Mayor Keiser.

2. Additions and Deletions to the Agenda – None

3. Presentations
A. The Mayor presented a Proclamation honoring the life of Sterling "Nathan" Cross.

4. Report on Closed Session – The City Council met and discussed one item on the Closed Session agenda. No reportable action was taken.

5. Additional Materials – None

6. Oral Communications by Members of the Public
 Goran Klepic, Santa Cruz County resident, spoke about the condition of the restroom at Jade Street Park.
 Gerry Jensen, resident, spoke about upcoming fundraisers for the Wharf on September 27th and October 14th.

7. Staff / City Council Comments
 Chief Dally reminded the City Council and public of the Gun Buy Back Program at the County Sheriff’s Office September 15th.
 Council Member Brooks requested that staff provide an update on the Jade Street Park restroom conditions.
 Council Member Clarke reminded the public of the Capitola Beach Festival on September 23rd and 24th.

8. Consent Items
A. City Council Meeting Minutes
Recommended Action: Approve minutes from the regular meeting on August 24, 2023.

B. City Check Registers
Recommended Action: Approve check registers dated August 04, 2023 and August 18, 2023. 36 Item 8 A.

City Council Meeting Minutes – September 14, 2023
City of Capitola Page 2
C. Grand Jury Response – Honoring Commitments to the Public Recommended Action: Approve the responses to the Grand Jury Report and direct the City Clerk to submit the completed response packet pursuant to California Penal Code Section 933.05.

D. Purchasing and Procurement Policy and Ordinance
Recommended Action: Introduce, by title only, waiving further reading of the text, an ordinance amending Chapter 3.16 of the Capitola Municipal Code pertaining to Purchasing and Purchasing Contracts; and adopt revised Administrative Policy III-4: Purchasing and Procurement Policy.

E. Chapter 18.02 Affordable (Inclusionary) Housing
Recommended Action: Adopt an ordinance of the City of Capitola amending Chapter 18.02 of the Capitola Municipal Code, Affordable (Inclusionary) Housing.

F. CalOES Designated Agents for Disaster Assistance
Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution certifying the Capitola staff members who are authorized to submit CalOES paperwork.

G. Designation of Loading Zone for the Capitola Hotel
Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution establishing a loading zone adjacent to the frontage of 210 Esplanade (Capitola Hotel).

H. Surf Cameras on the Capitola Wharf and the Bandstand Pavilion Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Surfline/Wavetrak, Inc. to install and maintain new surf camaras on the Capitola Wharf and maintain existing surf cameras on the Bandstand Pavilion at no cost to the City.

Motion to approve the Consent Calendar: Vice Mayor Brown Seconded: Council Member Brooks
Voting Yea: Council Members Brooks, Clarke, Pedersen, Vice Mayor Brown, and Mayor Keiser

9. General Government / Public Hearings
A. Mall Redevelopment Land Use Study
Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Kosmont Companies for the Capitola Mall Redevelopment Land Use Study in the amount of $25,000.

Community Development Director Herlihy presented the staff report.

Council Member discussion included a request to include Housing Element outcomes in the scope of work for this agreement and suggested that MBEP be included in the Technical Committee.

Motion to authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Kosmont Companies:

Council Member Brooks
Seconded: Vice Mayor Brown
Voting Yea: Council Members Brooks, Clarke, Pedersen, Vice Mayor Brown, and Mayor Keiser
B. City Hall Needs Assessment and Alternatives Analysis Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Group 4 Architecture for Phase 1 of the City Hall Sites Needs Assessment and Alternatives Analysis Report in the amount of $49,950.
37 Item 8 A.

City Council Meeting Minutes – September 14, 2023
City of Capitola Page 3
Community Development Director Herlihy presented the staff report.

Council Member discussion included requests to modify the scope of work to remove certain elements that staff could conduct.

Motion to authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Group 4 Architecture with additional direction to negotiate the scope of work: Vice Mayor Brown Seconded: Council Member Clarke
Voting Yea: Council Members Brooks, Clarke, Pedersen, Vice Mayor Brown, and Mayor Keiser
C. Pedestrian Pathway from the Upper Beach and Village Parking Lot to Monterey Avenue Recommended Action: Direct staff to proceed with developing the final design of pedestrian pathway from the Upper Beach and Village Parking Lot to Monterey Avenue consistent with pathway configuration Alternative 3, as described in the staff report.

Public Works Director Kahn presented the staff report.

Council Member discussion included clarification on tree replacement sizing.

Motion to direct staff to develop the final design as presented in Alternative 3 : Council Member Clarke
Seconded: Council Member Pedersen
Voting Yea: Council Members Brooks, Clarke, Pedersen, Vice Mayor Brown, and Mayor Keiser
D. Long-Term Strategic Planning
Recommended Action: Provide feedback regarding the development process for a longer-term City of Capitola Strategic Plan.

Chloe Woodmansee, Assistant to the City Manager, presented the staff report.

The City Council provided feedback to staff and recommended creation of a living document, recognition of the importance of priorities and strategies for the City, a request for a regional element of the plan, and the importance of an operational element which aligns with annual City Council goals.

E. Interim Building Official
Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution for an exception to the 180-day wait period per Government Code Section 7522.56 & 21221(h) and approve the appointment of Robin Woodman as the Interim Building Official-Retired Annuitant.

Chloe Woodmansee, Assistant to the City Manager, presented the staff report.

Motion to adopt the resolution: Vice Mayor Brown
Seconded: Council Member Pedersen
Voting Yea: Council Members Brooks, Clarke, Pedersen, Vice Mayor Brown, and Mayor Keiser
F. City Council Appointments to City Advisory Bodies
Recommended Action: Appoint members of the public to the City of Capitola Arts and Cultural Commission.

City Clerk Moss presented the staff report.
38 Item 8 A.

City Council Meeting Minutes – September 14, 2023
City of Capitola Page 4
Motion to appoint Mario Beltramo to a term expiring 12/31/2024: Vice Mayor Brown Seconded: Council Member Brooks
Voting Yea: Council Members Brooks, Clarke, Pedersen, Vice Mayor Brown, and Mayor Keiser

10. Adjournment – Adjourned at 7:19 PM to the next regularly scheduled meeting on September 28, 2023.
____________________________
ATTEST: Margaux Keiser, Mayor
____________________________
Julia Moss, City Clerk
39 Item 8 A.

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
Number: III-4
Issued: August 29, 2002
Revised: 3/9/06
7/26/12
10/27/16
9/14/23
Jurisdiction: City Council

PURCHASING & PROCUREMENT POLICY

PURPOSE
To establish policies and procedures to establish efficient procedure, secure supplies, services and equipment at the lowest possible cost, maintain financial control over purchases, define authority in the purchasing system, and assure quality of purchases.

POLICY
The Purchasing and Procurement Policy has been developed in order to achieve the following objectives:

A. Establish authority, responsibility, and accountability for purchasing activities conducted on behalf of the City.

B. Ensure competition and impartiality in all purchasing transactions to the maximum extent possible.

C. Standardize procedures where appropriate to ensure that City-wide policies and goals are achieved.

D. Maintain department responsibility, initiative, and flexibility in evaluating, selecting, and purchasing goods and services.

E. Implement simple yet effective internal control procedures that appropriately support planning, maximize productive use of public funds, and protect City assets from unauthorized use.

F. Communicate City-wide purchasing goals, policies and procedures to departmental staff involved in purchasing activities.

G. Decentralize decision-making to the maximum extent possible consistent with prudent review and internal control procedures.

AUTHORITY
The City’s purchasing ordinance delegates purchasing authority to the City Manager, as well as any other representatives designated by the City Manager. The maximum purchasing authority level of the City Manager is defined in Section 3.16.050 of the Capitola Municipal Code as $50,000; with the exception of single capital equipment purchases that do not exceed $75,000 and are approved in the budget.
40 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

Each year, the City Manager will approve purchasing authority levels on an Expenditure Authorization Form. The delegated purchasing levels shall not exceed the City Manger’s purchasing authority.

The City Manager also has the authority to approve individual changes orders up $50,000. If cumulative change orders exceed $50,000, or 10% of the original contract amount, they must be approved by City Council.

RESPONSIBILITY
The City maintains a decentralized purchasing system; and Department Heads are responsible for distributing, advertising, collecting and evaluating all procurement activities conducted within their Departments with Finance Department assistance.

A. Employees – Each employee is responsible for following these practices. Violation of this policy may result in disciplinary action, termination of employment, or criminal prosecution.

B. Department Heads – Department Heads are responsible for ensuring that all employees of their department who conduct purchasing activities possess a thorough understanding of these standards of ethical conduct and prohibited practices.

C. City Manager – The City Manager is responsible for ensuring that all Department Heads who conduct purchasing activities possess a thorough understanding of these standards of ethical conduct and prohibited practices.

Additional purchasing responsibilities are outlined in the chart presented below:
41 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

Purchasing System Responsibilities
Purchasing Policies and Ordinance
- Adopts Purchasing Ordinance
- Approves Purchasing and Procurement Policy
City Council -
- Delegates authority to award contracts to the City Manager - Awards contracts if they exceed the budgeted amount
Purchasing Policies, Ordinances, and Resolutions
- Implements purchasing policies
- Delegates purchasing authority
City Manager - Awards major contracts
-
Approves Bids/RFP's
(Contingent upon Council approval in the budget)
- Approves single Capital Equipment purchases up to $75,000 (Contingent upon Council approval in the budget)
Administrative Policies and Procedures
- Develops and implements purchasing guidelines
-
Monitors and evaluates system performance
Maintains financial project files for Capital Project over $50,000 Finance Department - Sets payment schedule
- Approves authorized purchase orders up to $50,000
- Assists departments with purchasing needs
Organization Wide Procedures
- Develops and implements departmental purchasing procedures Department Heads - Delegates department purchasing authority - Approves major departmental purchases
Department Procedures
- Purchases, receives, and pays for goods and services in accordance with the City and departmental guidelines
Authorized Employees - Prepares necessary bid documents - Maintains required purchasing records
- Manages department inventories
42 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

PURCHASING STANDARDS OF CONDUCT
Every employee or official engaged in purchasing activities on behalf of the City is required to employ the following standards of conduct:
o Consider the interests of the City first, in all transactions o Carry-out established policies of the City
o Seek to obtain the maximum value for each expenditure of public funds o Inspect materials, supplies and equipment delivered to determine their conformance with the specifications set forth in the order or contract
o Maintain confidentiality of information furnished by vendors and/or contractors regarding price, terms, performance specifications, or other data prior to a bid opening. All information that is presented during the public bid opening will be made available after the award.

The following practices are specifically prohibited in performing purchasing activities on behalf of the City:
o Having a financial or personal beneficial interest (directly or indirectly) in any contract or purchase
o Accepting or receiving (directly or indirectly) from any person, firm, or corporation to who any contract or purchase order may be awarded any money or anything of value, or promise or obligation or contract for future reward or compensation. Inexpensive advertising items bearing the name of the firm - such as pencils, pens, paperweights, or calendars - are not considered articles of value or gifts in relation to the policy o Using position or status in the City to solicit (directly or indirectly) business of any kind; or to purchase products at special discounts or upon special concessions for private use from any person or firm who sells or solicits sales to the City. o Dividing purchases with the intent to circumvent the purchasing authority levels

DELEGATION OF CONTRACTING AUTHORITY
A. The City Council retains all contracting authority not specifically delegated in this Policy.

This Policy shall supersede all ordinances, resolutions and policies related to the City’s procurement system adopted prior to adoption of this Policy. In the event of an inconsistency between this Policy and any prior ordinances, resolutions or policies of the City Council, this Policy shall control.
43 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

B. Any delegation of contracting authority contained in this Policy shall only be exercised (a) in accordance with state law, City ordinances and adopted City policies, as applicable, and (b) only if adequate funds have been included in the approved City Budget for the applicable year or otherwise appropriated by the City Council.

CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACT REVIEW
The City Attorney shall approve all contracts, including amendments to contracts, as to form and legality prior to the execution of the contract by the authorized City official. The City Attorney’s approval shall be evidenced by his or her signature on the contract. City Attorney approval on change orders to public projects is not required, but may be requested, at the discretion of the City Manager or Department Head.

LOCAL VENDOR PREFERENCE
Departments are encouraged to do business with Capitola-based businesses due to the benefit to the community and the advantages in timing and availability. This preference should be given whenever it is legal, economical, and results in competitive product or service. Purchasers will actively seek to identify local vendors interested and able to conduct business with the City of Capitola. It is important that purchasers include in their inquiry or invitation to bid, the opportunity for vendors to identify themselves as local and to provide necessary supporting evidence (see definition of local vendor).

Bids, quotes, or offers submitted by Capitola-based vendors will be credited with the current local (City) sales tax and local (City) transactions & use tax in effect. This net bid will be used to compare bids. In the event of a tie, bids submitted by Capitola vendors will be given preference.

A. Purchasing goods and services from local vendors is desired because it stimulates the local economy and recognizes that our local vendors are valued members of our community. If factors such as quality, previous performance, and availability are equal among vendors, a vendor whose business is located within the City limits shall be awarded a contract if their quote or bid is within 5% of the low bid.

B. Local preference does not apply to public projects, purchases procured under federal or state requirements, or cooperative purchases with other agencies.

C. The vendor must have a valid City business license and employ at least one full-time employee located at a City business address.

D. Local bidders must bid with the same specification as required of non-local bidders.

ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLES
Vehicles powered by clean alternative fuels as defined by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 and other energy efficient advanced technology vehicles shall be given consideration when purchasing new and replacement fleet vehicles
44 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

TERMINOLOGY
Best Value (Lowest Responsible Bidder): Best value is largely based on cost; however, the following factors could be considered in awarding a contract: Skills of the contractor, ability to provide supplies or services; timely processing; and compliance with governing statutes. The complete definition of best value is provided in Section 3.16.040 (A) of the Municipal Code.

Bid: Formal process to obtain lowest responsive responsible bidder or price for materials, supplies and services, and equipment
Consultant or Professional Services: Services of an attorney, engineer, doctor, financial consultant, planning or environmental consultant, investment advisor, bank or trustee office, or other professional Contract: A written agreement between two or more persons setting forth a matter of performance and compensation or consideration given for the performance. The term contract includes, but is not limited to; purchase orders, contract for services, an addendum or change order or a letter agreement.

Local Business (Local vendor/Capitola-based business): Any business which has a retail outlet within city limits of the City of Capitola and holds the required licenses and permits for conducting its business within the City.

Maintenance: Routine, recurring, and usual work for the preservation or protection of any publicly owned or publicly operated facility for its intended purposes. It also includes minor painting, resurfacing of streets less than one inch; and landscape maintenance. This definition is provided in Section 22002 (c) of the Public Contract Code and should be contrasted with Public Project.

Open Market Purchases: Purchases of supplies, equipment, and general services from $5,000 - $25,000.

Over the Counter or Informal Purchases: Purchases under $5,000 made by authorized personnel.

Petty Cash: Cash used to reimburse authorized purchases up to $80. All reimbursements must be accompanied by a receipt.

Public Project: Construction, reconstruction, erection, alteration, renovation, improvement, demolition, and repair work involving any publicly owned, leased, or operated facility. This can also include the painting or repainting of publicly owned, leased, or operated facility. This definition is provided in Section 22002 (c) of the Public Contract Code and should be contrasted with the definition of Maintenance.

Purchase Order: A document used to acknowledge acceptable of a bid quotation or offer, and a contractual relationship is established upon its issuance and acceptance by the vendor.

Request for Proposal (RFP): An offer in to provide materials, supplies or services where the City selects vendor/consultant usually based upon criteria specified in Request for Proposal such as competence, qualifications and expertise in the field. Price is not the sole basis for selection, but may be considered in the criteria for evaluating proposals. Typically used for consultant or professional service contracts.
45 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

General Services: Any work performed or services rendered by an independent contractor, with or without the furnishing of materials such as a professional consultant.

Sole Source: Sole source purchases are used where no secondary source is reasonably available precluding the use of a competitive process.

ENCUMBRANCE OF FUNDS
A. Except in cases of emergency, or by order of the City Council, purchase orders shall not be issued unless there exists an unencumbered appropriation in the department budget against which the purchase order is to be charged.

B. Purchase orders do not roll over from one fiscal year to the next if unused, except for contract and professional services procured by an approved contract with terms that cross fiscal years.

All other purchase orders shall be used in the fiscal year they were issued. In the event a planned purchase is delayed and will not occur until the next fiscal year, a new purchase order must be requested by the Department Head in the new fiscal year. For budget purposes, expenditures for goods or services will be realized based upon the date the order/service is received.

C. Invoices shall not be coded based upon budget lines that have unused/available funds. Invoices shall be coded to the correct budget line item according to the nature of the goods or services provided. It is the responsibility of the Department Head to request budget adjustments as needed to allow for the correct coding of invoices.

UNLAWFUL PURCHASES OR CONTRACTS
If any officer or employee purchases or contracts for any goods or services contrary to the provisions of these Procedures, such purchase order or contract may be void and of no effect. The staging or splitting of the purchase of goods or procurement of services, without proper justification or to avoid the authorization limits, is prohibited.

RECORD KEEPING
Each department is responsible for maintaining its own purchasing and contracting records when formal council action was not required. ALL ORIGINAL, EXECUTED CONTRACTS MUST BE

PROVIDED TO THE CITY CLERK, WHO SHALL MAINTAIN SUCH ORIGINAL EXECUTED CONTRACTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY’S RETENTION SCHEDULE REGARDLESS OF THE REQUIRED APPROVAL LEVEL (i.e. Department Head, City Manager, City Council). Upon expiration of the term of a contract for any reason, any bids, specifications, and other pertinent data shall be retained by the department in accordance with the City’s adopted document retention schedule. These are public records and available for public inspection upon request.

SHARED FOLDER
In order to ensure proper record keeping a shared folder shall be created to track all aspects of a project. A list of items to be kept electronic include: bid documents, contract, change orders, purchase 46 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

orders, invoices, and communications that impact the overall project. Each department is responsible to save a copy of their responsible aspects of the project to the shared folder. The shared folder can also include the Financial Accounting System documents.

PURCHASING SYSTEM OVERVIEW
A general overview of the City’s purchasing procedures; thresholds, and responsibilities are presented in the following charts. Detailed procedures for each Purchasing Category are provided in subsequent sections of this policy:
47 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

Purchasing System Chart
Scope Category Features
- No Specific requirements
Less than $5,000
- Competitive bidding to be used when practical
- Bid award by department
Supplies
Equipment
Operating Services $5,000 - $25,000 -
Department solicits, and documents, at least three
proposals
Maintenance Services - Public projects require noticing - Bid award by Finance via purchase order
Professional Services(1)
- Formal Bid/RFP documents
- Advertising for sealed bids/proposals
Greater than
$25,000 -
City Manager approves Bid/RFP document and
the solicitation of bids/proposals
- Contract award generally delegated by Council
to the City Manager if within budget
- Informal Bid/RFP documents
- Solicit a minimum of three bids/proposals,
Capital Equipment advertise if appropriate
(Authorized in Budget) $25,001 - $75,000
(Authorized in Budget) - City Manager approves Bid/RFP document and soliciting bids/proposals
- Bid awarded by Finance via purchase order
Public projects, as defined by the Uniform Public
Construction Cost Accounting Act, Section
22000 et seq., of the Public Contract Code, may
be let to contract alternative bidding procedures,
in a manner consistent with the applicable dollar
thresholds, as set forth in Section 22032 of
the Public Contract Code, as may be amended
from time to time
-
Public Projects
Alternative Bid
Procedures
-
-
(1) Additional information related to Professional Services/RFP’s is provided in the Supplemental Information Section. 48 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

(2) The Capitola Municipal Code and this Administrative Procedure provides additional guidelines regarding emergency situations.

PURCHASING CATEGORIES AND PROCEDURES
I. General Purchases under $5,000
 Purchases under $5,000 may be made by an authorized Purchasing Designee. A Department Head, or his/her designee, is authorized to purchase goods or procure services (except professional services) for an amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) or less, if adequate funds have been appropriated by the City Council in the budget. City Council appropriation of funds is required prior to such purchase or procurement.  No competitive process is required, but the Department Head shall endeavor to purchase goods or procure services at the lowest cost commensurate with the quality needed.

II. Open Market Purchases - Purchases between $5,000 and $25,000 The purchase of supplies, equipment, and general services of a value from $5,000 to $25,000 may be made by authorized personnel. An additional bidding requirement is outlined for purchases that are defined as a Public Project.

1. The City Manager, or his/her designee, is authorized to purchase goods or procure services for an amount more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) and up to Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000), if adequate funds have been appropriated by the City Council in the budget.

City Council appropriation of funds is required prior to such purchase or procurement.

2. The department must seek three (3) oral or written quotes and document the receipt of the quotes. The vendor offering the best value, after considering any local preference, shall be selected. For the purchase of goods, if the lowest price quote is not selected, the Department Head shall document in the file the basis for the selection of the vendor.

3. A contract may be required for the purchase of goods, and a contract is required for the procurement of services. All contracts are to be in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Contracts are generally not required for the routine purchase of goods, such as purchasing office supplies, tires or paper goods. However, whenever the purchase of goods involves a special or unique requirement, a contract should be entered into between the City and the vendor. When in doubt regarding whether a contract is required or advisable, consult with the City Attorney.

4. If it is reasonably anticipated by the Department Head that the annual total cost of a particular good or service would exceed $25,000 (excluding public projects), then incremental purchases of that good or service shall be pursuant to a contract approved by the City Council. The contract can be for a per service hour or per item rate but must be renewed according to the procedures set forth in this ordinance at the end of the contract term. For example, if a department normally purchases 300 tires annually at a cost exceeding $25,000 overall, which would require the department to seek (3) three oral or written quotes and the approval of the City Council if the purchase was completed all at once, then incremental purchases of 50 tires shall be pursuant to a contract specifying the per tire rate approved by the City Council. The contract shall be valid for a minimum of one (1) year and it is the responsibility of the Department Head to ensure each invoice received from the consultant is calculated at the 49 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

approved rate. The purpose of this provision is to achieve uniformity and savings in the costs associated with goods or services provided by the same contractor/vendor.

5. The staging or splitting of the purchase of goods or procurement of services, without proper justification or to avoid the authorization limits, is prohibited.

6. Amendments to a purchase order and/or contract which result in the total amount exceeding the authority of the City Manager shall require City Council approval.

III. Formal Purchases - General, services, supplies, and equipment greater than $25,00 (excluding public works projects as defined by Public Contracting Code section 22002(c)).

A. Request for Quotes/RFP’s shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

1. A general description of the item(s) or services to be purchased;

2. The location where quote/RFP specifications may be secured;

3. 4. The location and deadline for submission of quote/RFP B. Notices requesting Quotes/RFP’s shall be made as follows:

1. For supplies, services, and equipment, notices inviting quotes/RFPs shall be published on the City’s website.

2. The City may also give such other notice as it deems appropriate C. Rejection of Quotes/RFP’s
The purchasing authority may reject:

1. Any quote or proposal that fails to meet the bidding requirements in any respect

2. All quotes or proposals, for any reason whatsoever, and may readvertise for new bids or abandon the purchase

3. In the case of public projects, the council may, by passage of a resolution by a four-fifths vote, declare that the project can be performed more economically by employees of the City and may have the project done by force account
D. Bids/RFP’s - None Received
If no bids are received the purchase may be made through negotiated contract or other process approved by the Finance Director.

E. Contract Award
Subject to the approval of the City Manager, contracts shall be awarded by the purchasing authority to the quote/proposal which represents the best value to the City as defined in Section

3.16.040, except as follows:

1. If two or more quotes/proposals received are for the same total amount or unit price, quality 50 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

and service being equal, and if the discretion of the purchasing authority the public interest will not permit the delay of readvertising for quotes/proposals, then the purchasing authority may accept the one he or she chooses or the lowest quote/proposal obtained through subsequent negotiation with tied submitters.

2. Exceptions. The quotation procedure under this section may be dispensed with for purchases greater than twenty-five thousand dollars where supplies and equipment are purchased through cooperative purchasing arrangements with the state or other group of multiple governmental entities.

3. Sellers, vendors, suppliers and contractors who maintain places of business located within the limit of the City shall be given preference, if quality, price, service, and all other factors are equal.

The basis upon which the award is made shall be in writing.

F. Insurance
Insurance requirements will be provided via Purchase Order terms and conditions, or Request for Proposal terms and conditions information, or City contract.

G. Bidding Process Questions
Any questions received to the Project Manager during the bidding process should be supplied to all plan holders with corresponding answers. If the potential bidder asks the questions verbally, then the project manager shall record the questions and answer given and provide to all plan holders.

H. Change Orders
Projects at times will require change orders. Change Orders can be approved by the City Manager for amounts not to exceed $50,000, or 10% of the original contract, whichever is larger. The change orders, once approved, will be executed by the Finance department, and finance will make corresponding Purchase Order Adjustments.

I. Project Folder
The Department will keep a project folder for contracts over $50,000. The Project Folder will include proof of the Bidding process, copy of bid proposal costs, contract, purchase order, contract amendments, and all associated costs in relations to the project. The project folder shall also have copies of prudent communications. The project folder can be kept electronically on a shared drive and shall be destroyed upon expiration of the applicable retention period as outlined in the City’s retention schedule.

J. Project Closeout
Upon completion of a project, the project shall be closed out with the City Council. In the project closeout the project is accepted as complete thus releasing any and all retention. The closeout will also provide a summary of the budget and total cost of the project. If the project is over budget, then additional funds need to be identified and if the project is under budget then the reallocation of those need to be identified.

IV. Capital Equipment Purchases between $25,001 - $75,000 Section 3.16.050 (A)(2) of the Municipal Code provides the City Manager with the authority to approve contracts for single equipment purchases based on the following criteria:
51 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

 Single equipment purchases are not greater than $75,000  The equipment was clearly identified and described in the budget  City Council approves the capital equipment purchase in the budget  The equipment description listed in the budget is consistent with the item purchased  The final cost does not exceed the amount approved in the budget V. Alternative Bid Procedure for Public Projects – Informal Bid Procedures Public projects, as defined by the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, Section 22000 et seq., of the Public Contract Code, may be let to contract alternative bidding procedures, in a manner consistent with the applicable dollar thresholds, as set forth in Section 22032 of the Public Contract Code, as may be amended from time to time.

Where a public project is to be performed, and is eligible to utilize the informal bidding provisions of subsection (b) of Section 22032 of the Public Contract Code, as may be amended from time to time, the following procedures shall apply:
(a) A notice inviting abbreviated bids shall be mailed or emailed to all contractors for the category of work to be bid, as shown on the list developed in accordance with Section 3.16.085, and to all construction trade journals as specified by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission in accordance with Section 22036 of the Public Contract Code, unless the product or service is proprietary. Additional contractors and/or construction trade journals may be notified at the discretion of the department soliciting bids; provided however:
(1) If there is no list of qualified contractors maintained by the city for the particular category of work performed, the notice inviting bids shall be sent only to the construction trade journals specified by the commission.
(2) If the product or service is proprietary in nature such that it can be obtained only from a certain contractor or contractors, the notice inviting abbreviated bids may be sent exclusively to such contractor or contractors.
(b) All mailing of notices to contractors and construction trade journals pursuant to subsection (a) shall be completed not less than ten calendar days before bids are due. (c) The notice inviting informal bids shall describe the project in general terms and how to obtain more detailed information about the project and state the time and place for the submission of bids. (d) For public projects that are under seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) and have followed these informal bidding procedures, the city manager may award the contract. (e) If all bids received are in excess of two hundred thousand dollars, or the limits established by subsection (d) of Section 22034 of the Public Contract Code, whichever is higher, the city council, by adoption of a resolution by a four-fifths vote, may award the contract, at no more than two hundred twelve thousand five hundred dollars, or the limit established by subsection (d) of Section 22034 of the Public Contract Code, whichever is higher, to the lowest responsible bidder, if it determines the cost estimate was reasonable.

VI. Public Projects – Formal Bid Procedures
52 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

Contracts for public projects as defined by the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, Section 22000 et seq., of the Public Contract Code, in an amount exceeding the current limit as specified in subsection (c) of Section 22032 of the Public Contract Code, as may be amended from time to time, shall be accomplished using the formal bidding procedure described in this section. (a) Notice Inviting Bids. Notices inviting bids shall distinctly describe the project, shall state where bid blanks and specifications may be secured, and shall state the time and place for the receiving and opening of sealed bids.
(1) Published Notice. Notice inviting bids shall be published at least fourteen calendar days before the date of opening the bids in a newspaper of general circulation, printed, and published in the city.
(2) Construction Trade Journals. The notice inviting formal bids shall also be mailed, and emailed to all construction trade journals, and posted on the city’s website, or other website used for bidding on public projects, as specified by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission in accordance with the requirements of Section 22036 of the Public Contract Code. (b) Bidder’s Security. All bids presented in connection with the public project shall be accompanied by bidder’s security in the form and amount prescribed by Public Contract Code Section 20170 et seq., which security shall be dealt with as prescribed therein. In all cases bidders shall be entitled to return of bid security provided that a successful bidder shall forfeit his or her bid security upon refusal or failure to execute the contract within ten days after the notice of award of contract has been mailed unless the city is responsible for the delay. The city council may, on refusal or failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract, award it to the next lowest responsible bidder. If the city council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder’s security shall be applied by the city to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder.
(c) Bid Opening Procedure. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the department identified in the invitation for bid documents and shall be identified as bids on the envelope. Bids shall be opened in public at the time and place stated in the public notice. A tabulation of all bids received shall be open for public inspection during regular business hours for a period of not less than thirty calendar days after the bid opening.
(d) Rejection of Bids or No Bids Received. In its discretion, the city council may reject any and all bids presented and readvertise for bids. If no bids are received, the city council may award the project by negotiated contract.
(e) Award of Contracts. Contracts shall be awarded by the city council to the lowest responsible bidder except as otherwise provided herein.
(f) Tie Bids. If two or more bids received are for the same amount or unit price, quality and service being equal, and if the public interest will not permit the delay of readvertising for bids, the city council may accept the one it chooses or accept the lowest bid made by negotiation with the tie bidders or may utilize a public drawing.
(g) Performance Bonds. The department head shall have authority to require a performance bond before entering into a contract in such amount as he or she finds reasonably necessary to protect the best interests of the city. If the department head requires a performance bond, the form and amount of the bond shall be described in the notice inviting bids. 53 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

VII. Federal Award Projects
Federal Procurement: Any procurement made pursuant to a federal award or subject to reimbursement, in whole or in part, with federal funds must comply with the City’s procurement procedures, state law, and the applicable Federal Procurement Requirements, including 2 CFR § 200.322 (“Procurement of recovered materials”), 2 CFR § 200.323 (“Contract cost and price”), 2 CFR § 200.324 (“Federal awarding agency or passthrough entity review”), 2 CFR § 200.325 (“Bonding requirements”), and 2 CFR § 200.326 (“Contract provisions”). In the event of any conflict between City, state, or federal requirements, the most stringent requirement must be used. (See 2 CFR § 200.318.) City employees must comply with funding agency requests for review of technical specifications or procurement documents as provided in 2 CFR § 200.324.

VIII. Emergency Procedures
An emergency is defined as an unexpected occurrence or threatened occurrence that poses a danger, requiring immediate action to prevent or mitigate the loss or impairment of life, health, property, or essential public services, or any emergency proclaimed pursuant to Municipal Code 8.08.060.

Upon approval of the City Manager or Finance Director, authorized purchasing authorities may exceed the purchasing limits of $50.000. The following procedures are applicable to emergency purchases:
 Documentation. It will be the responsibility of the requesting department to attach a copy of the written justification of the emergency signed by the City Manager to any invoices at the time the invoice is submitted to accounts payable for payment.  Reporting. All emergency purchases of goods and services over $50,000 will be immediately reported by the department responsible for the purchase to the City Clerk for inclusion as an information item on the Agenda for the next scheduled meeting of the City Council.

In accordance with Chapter 2.5, Section 22050(a) of the Public Contract Code, the information on emergency purchase action shall be presented to the City Council for review and determination, by a four-fifths vote, that there is a need to continue the emergency action. This must occur within seven days after the action, or at the City Council’s next regularly scheduled meeting if that meeting will occur within 14 days after the action. The emergency purchase action shall be presented to the City Council at least at every subsequent regularly scheduled meeting until the action is terminated.

The City Council must determine, by a four-fifth vote, that there is a need to continue the emergency action.

SUPPLEMENTAL PURCHASING INFORMATION
I. Requests for Proposals (RFP)
Request for Proposal (RFP) are typically associated with general or professional service contracts over $5,000. This document requests a firm to submit a proposal to perform the scope of work 54 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

associated with a specific project. Cost is not the sole basis for selection in an RFP, other criteria such as experience, turn-around time, and approach to work are determining factors when evaluating a proposal. Based on the estimated cost of service, the corresponding Open Market, Formal bid, or Alternative Bid procedures are applicable.

Additional information related to the development and criteria of RFP’s is listed below:

A. RFP Requirements
The RFP will be specific to the project and preparation will require some general knowledge of the project. However, preparation of the RFP should not involve any work for which the proposer would normally be compensated during the project. For example, on engineering projects, free preliminary engineering in the RFP should be discouraged. The RFP should address the following:
1) Required Information: In the RFP, the consultant shall be advised of the following requirements:
a. Standard contract requirements
b. Selection criteria.
c. Date and time proposal is due.
d. The name and telephone number of the staff member responsible for the project.
2) Selection & Evaluation Criteria. Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of the evaluation factors listed in the Request for Proposal. Respondents should be ranked based on the selection criteria. As a minimum, the following criteria will be used to evaluate the RFP.
a. Firm experience (including work and project-related references). b. Specific staff experience and availability (including work and projectrelated references). c. Approved methods to accomplish the work.
d. Scope of work and schedule
e. cost
3) Price Considerations. Although price is always a consideration in recommending awarding the final selection, prices will not be a mandatory consideration in the initial evaluation process. At the discretion of the department, a department may opt to adopt an RFP procedure with price information in a separate sealed envelope. The envelopes shall not be opened until the highest rated firm is identified based upon demonstrated competence and professional qualifications. At that time, the price information will be compared to professional qualification to ensure that the price is fair and reasonable.

If a major discrepancy between highest rated firm and the others exist, that discrepancy shall be evaluated and explained before award of the work. If not satisfactorily resolved, the department may to negotiate with the next-highest-ranked firm.

II. Sole Source
55 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

1. Materials, Supplies & Equipment:
a. Definition. Sole source purchases are used where no secondary source is reasonably available precluding the use of a competitive process. The following are examples of circumstances, which could necessitate sole source procurements:
1) Where compatibility of equipment, accessories or replacement parts is an important consideration;
2) Where public utility services are to be procured;
3) Where a sole supplier's item is needed for trial use or testing; 4) Where a used item is offered at a bargain price and subject to prior sale;
5) Where a cooperative purchasing agreement has been developed with another public agency that used a competitive selection process. 6) Where supply proximity is an important consideration.

2. Consultant or General Services:
a. In the case where a consulting firm has satisfactorily performed the previous stage of a project (e.g. a pre-design), or has acquired extensive background and working knowledge, the firm may be selected for followup work without solicitations from other firm upon written justification and recommendation of the department head and approval by the City Manager or designee.
b. If a firm is a highly recognized authority in a field or specialty, or has unique specific knowledge regarding the project, then the firm may be selected without other solicitations for contracts and upon written justification and recommendation of the department head and approval by the City Manager or designee.
c. Upon those infrequent occasions when confidence in the consultant and quality of service are important.

4. Documentation: It is the responsibility of the requesting department to maintain in their files a complete, written justification of the sole source purchase approved by the City Manager

5. Authorization & Reporting: All sole source purchases of more than $50,000 are authorized by the City Council and fully disclosed in the staff agenda report. Sole source purchases between $5,000 and $50,000 are authorized by the City Manager.

Sole source purchases less than $5,000 are authorized by the Department Heads.

III. Multiple Year Contracts

1. Applicability. When it is in the best interest of the City, multiple year contracts will be allowed.

High vendor "startup costs" or the need for continuity may make a multiple year contract 56 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

financially or operationally advantageous to the City. Under no circumstances should a multiple year contract be used to avoid competitive procurement procedures.

2. Termination Due to Lack of Funds. All multiple year contracts should contain a clause allowing the City to terminate the contract in thirty (30) days or subsequent fiscal years due to a lack of budgeted funds.

3. Term. The term of a multiple year contract should be clearly delineated. "Open end" contracts will not be used.

4. Authority. Multiple-year contracts are subject to the same authority levels detailed above.

5. Changes. Changes to multiple-year contracts are covered under "Change Orders" below.

6. Extension. Extension of contracts requires the approval of the City Manager via City contract amendment form.

7. Addendum. Increase in dollar amounts on an agreement, which results in an aggregate total in excess of $50,000 requires approval from the City Council.

IV. City Engineer Review and Approval
In accordance with Government Code section 830.6, the City Engineer shall have authority to review and approve the plan or design of any construction work or work of improvement to public property and for contracts for construction subject to approval by the City Manager. For contracts to be awarded by the City Council, the City Engineer shall review such plans and designs and shall recommend the approval of such plan or design by the City Council as part of its award of such contract.

This policy was approved and authorized by:
_______________________________
Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
57 Item 8 B.
4869-6527-3982 v1
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CAPITOLA AMENDING SECTION 3.16.010,

3.16.030, 3.16.050, 3.16.075, 3.16.080 AND ADDING SECTIONS 3.16.085, 3.16.090,

3.16.095 AND 3.16.100 TO THE CITY OF CAPITOLA MUNICIPAL CODE

REGARDING PURCHASING AND PURCHASING CONTRACTS
WHEREAS, By Resolution no. 3926, the City Council of the City of Capitola elected to opt into the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Act (Public Contract Code 22000- 22045; and
WHEREAS, Public Contract Code section 22032 is periodically revised to establish new bidding requirements depending on the value of the public project at issue; and WHEREAS, the most recent update to Public Contract Code section 22032 became effective in 2019; and
WHEREAS, the City of Capitola’s Municipal Code sections regarding purchasing and purchasing contracts must similarly be amended to reflect the updates to the Public Contracting Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby desires to amend the Capitola Municipal Code to reflect recent changes to the California Uniform Cost Accounting Act.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPITOLA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The above findings are adopted and incorporated herein.

Section 2. Section 3.16.010 – Purpose is amended as follows. New wording is shown in underline and deletions are shown in strikethrough

3.16.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to:

A. Provide for the authority of city officers to enter into certain contracts even in which funds have been appropriated without a formal city council approval of the specific contract or transaction and to set forth procedural requirements; and B. Establish efficient procedures for the purchase of supplies, equipment, and general services, and public projects at the lowest possible cost commensurate with quality needed, to exercise positive financial control over purchases to clearly define authority for the purchasing function, and to assure the quality of purchases; and C. To inform those wishing to contract with the city of the authority of the city employee or official to create a binding contract; and
D. To assist the city treasurer in carrying out his or her duties under Government Code Section 41001.
58 Item 8 B.
4869-6527-3982 v1
Section 3. Section 3.16.030 – “General procedural requirements” is amended as follows. New wording is show in underline and deletions are shown in strikethrough.

Section 3.16.030 General procedural requirements
All contracts must be in writing and be signed in the name of the city. They may be transmitted by facsimile, or electronic mail, or digital signature consistent with the City’s electronic signature policy..

Section 4. Section 3.16.050(A) City Manager authority is amended as follows. New wording is shown in underline and deletions are shown in strikethrough.

1. Which contains an initial maximum compensation figure of twenty-five fifty thousand dollars or less, or a change order not exceeding seven thousand five hundred fifteen thousand dollars. (Cumulative additional orders exceeding twenty-five fifty thousand dollars must be approved by the city council);

2. Contracts for single capital equipment purchases that do not exceed fifty seventy-five thousand dollars; which are clearly defined and identified in the budget; Section 5. Section 3.16.075 Open market purchases – General services, supplies, and equipment – purchases between five thousand and twenty-five thousand dollars. New wording is shown in underline and deletions are shown in strikethrough.

A. Request Invitation for Bids Quotes or Proposals.

3. Public Projects Between Five Thousand Dollars and Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars.

Notices inviting bids for public projects between five thousand dollars and twenty-five thousand dollars, shall be mailed to list of qualified contractors, identified according to categories of work, at least ten calendar days before the bids are due. Notices shall also be mailed within ten calendar days before the bids are due to all construction trade journals as required by the commission. If the city does not have a qualified list of contractors for the particular type of work to be performed, notices inviting bids will only be sent to the construction trade journals as required by the commission. If the product or service is proprietary in nature and can only be obtained from a certain contractor or contractors, notices inviting bids will only be mailed to such contractor or contractors.

B. Quotes / Proposals Bids – Retention. Quotations and proposals shall be submitted to the finance director who shall keep a record of all open-market orders and quotes for a period of one year after the submission of quotes or placing of orders. This record is open to public inspection. For a purchase in an amount between five thousand dollars and twenty-five thousand dollars, the quotations shall be written (including facsimile and electronic mail).

C. Rejection. The purchasing authority may reject:
59 Item 8 B.
4869-6527-3982 v1

1. Any quotations or proposals which fail to meet the specific purchase requirements in any respect; or

2. All quotations or proposals, for any reason whatsoever, and may invite new quotations or proposals.

D. Award of Contract. A contract shall be awarded to the quotation or proposal representing the best value as defined in Section 3.16.040. The basis upon which the award is made shall be in writing.

E. Public Projects – In Excess of Limit. In the event that all bids received for a construction project are more than the maximum allowed under this section, and bids were invited pursuant to the provisions of this section, the council may, by adoption of a resolution by four-fifths of a vote, award the contract, in an amount not to exceed the maximum set forth in Section 22034(f) of the Public Contract Code, to the lowest responsible bidder, if it determines that the cost estimate was reasonable. Otherwise, the bids shall be rejected; and if the agency decides to go forward with the project, shall be re-bid in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 3.16.080. (Ord. 972 § 1, 2012) Section 6. Section 3.16.080 Formal purchases – General services, supplies, and equipment greater than twenty-five thousand dollars. New wording is shown in underline and deletions are shown in strikethrough.

A. Request for Notice inviting bids quotes or proposals shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

1. A general description of the item(s) or services to be purchased, or the public work to be constructed or improved;

2. The location where bid quote or proposals blanks and specifications may be secured;

3. The time and place assigned for the opening of sealed bids;

4. The type and character of bidder’s security required, if any;

5. The location and deadline for submission of bid quote or proposal.

B. Notices inviting bids requesting quotes or proposals shall be made as follows:

1. For supplies, general services, and equipment, notices inviting bids quotes or proposals shall be published at least once in the official newspaper of the city, with the first publication occurring at least ten calendar days before the date of opening the bids on the City’s website.

2. For public projects greater than twenty-five thousand dollars, notices inviting bids distinctly describing the project shall be published at least once in the official newspaper of the city, with the first publication at least fourteen calendar days before the date of the opening bids. Notices inviting bids distinctly describing the project shall also be mailed at least thirty calendar days before the date of opening bids to all construction journals as required by the commission.
60 Item 8 B.
4869-6527-3982 v1

3. The city may also give such other notice as it deems appropriate.

C. Bids – Security Requirement. Bidder’s security may be required when deemed necessary by the purchasing authority. When required, the security form, amount and conditions, will be included in the bid documents. Bidders shall be entitled to return of bid security. However, a successful bidder shall forfeit his or her bid security upon refusal or failure to execute a contract within fifteen days after notice of award of that contract, unless the city is responsible for the delay. The contract may be awarded to the next lowest responsible bidder upon the refusal or failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract within the time herein prescribed.

D. Bids – Opening and Retention. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the purchasing authority and shall be identified as bids on the envelope. Bids shall be opened in public and read aloud at the time and place stated in the public notice. A tabulation of all bids received shall be available for public inspection during regular business hours for a period not less than thirty calendar days after the bid opening.

E. Rejection of Bids quotes or proposals. The purchasing authority may reject:

1. Any bid quote or proposal that fails to meet the bidding requirements in any respect; or

2. All bids quotes or proposals, for any reason whatsoever, and may readvertise for new bids quotes or proposals or abandon the purchase;

3. In the case of public projects, the council may, by passage of a resolution by a four-fifths vote, declare that the project can be performed more economically by employees of the city and may have the project done by force account.

F. Bids Quotes or Proposals – None Received. If no bids quotes or proposals are received the purchase may be made through negotiated contract or other process approved by the finance director, including, in the case of public projects, performing the work by employees of the city by force account.

G. Contract Award. Subject to the approval of the city manager, contracts shall be awarded by the purchasing authority to the bid quote or proposal which represents the best value to the city as defined in Section 3.16.040, except as follows:

1. If at the time of bid opening, two or more bids quotes or proposals received are for the same total amount or unit price, quality and service being equal, and if the discretion of the purchasing authority the public interest will not permit the delay of readvertising for bids quote or proposal, then the purchasing authority may accept the one he or she chooses or the lowest bid quote or proposal obtained through subsequent negotiation with tied bidders submitters.

2. Exceptions. The quotation procedure under this section may be dispensed with for purchases greater than twenty-five thousand dollars where supplies and equipment are purchased through cooperative purchasing arrangements with the state or other group of multiple governmental entities.
61 Item 8 B.
4869-6527-3982 v1
H. Requiring Bond of Successful Bidder. The purchasing authority may require as a condition to executing a contract on behalf of the city, a performance bond or a labor and material bond, or both, in such amounts as the purchasing authority shall determine appropriate to protect the best interests of the city. The form and amounts of such bond(s) shall be described in the notice inviting bids.

Section 7. A new Section 3.16.085 Alternative Bid Procedures for Public Projects is hereby added to the Capitola Municipal Code as set forth below.

Public projects, as defined by the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, Section 22000 et seq., of the Public Contract Code, may be let to contract alternative bidding procedures, in a manner consistent with the applicable dollar thresholds, as set forth in Section 22032 of the Public Contract Code, as may be amended from time to time.

Section 8. A new Section 3.16.090 Public Projects – Informal Bid Procedures is hereby added to the Capitola Municipal Code as set forth below.

Where a public project is to be performed, and is eligible to utilize the informal bidding provisions of subsection (b) of Section 22032 of the Public Contract Code, as may be amended from time to time, the following procedures shall apply:
(a) A notice inviting abbreviated bids shall be mailed or emailed to all contractors for the category of work to be bid, as shown on the list developed in accordance with Section 4.04.071, and to all construction trade journals as specified by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission in accordance with Section 22036 of the Public Contract Code, unless the product or service is proprietary. Additional contractors and/or construction trade journals may be notified at the discretion of the department soliciting bids; provided however:
(1) If there is no list of qualified contractors maintained by the city for the particular category of work performed, the notice inviting bids shall be sent only to the construction trade journals specified by the commission.
(2) If the product or service is proprietary in nature such that it can be obtained only from a certain contractor or contractors, the notice inviting abbreviated bids may be sent exclusively to such contractor or contractors.
(b) All mailing of notices to contractors and construction trade journals pursuant to subsection (a) shall be completed not less than ten calendar days before bids are due. € The notice inviting informal bids shall describe the project in general terms and how to obtain more detailed information about the project and state the time and place for the submission of bids. (d) For public projects that are under seventy-five thousand dollars and have followed these informal bidding procedures, the city manager may award the contract. € If all bids received are in excess of two hundred thousand dollars, or the limits established by subsection (d) of Section 22034 of the Public Contract Code, whichever is higher, the city council, by adoption of a resolution by a four-fifths vote, may award the contract, at no more than two hundred twelve thousand five hundred dollars, or the limit established by subsection (d) of Section 22034 of the Public Contract Code, whichever is higher, to the lowest responsible bidder, if it determines the cost estimate was reasonable.
62 Item 8 B.
4869-6527-3982 v1
Section 9. A new Section 3.16.095 Public Projects – Formal Bid Procedures is hereby added to the Capitola Municipal Code as set forth below.

Contracts for public projects as defined by the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, Section 22000 et seq., of the Public Contract Code, in an amount exceeding the current limit as specified in subsecti€(c) of Section 22032 of the Public Contract Code, as may be amended from time to time, shall be accomplished using the formal bidding procedure described in this section. (a) Notice Inviting Bids. Notices inviting bids shall distinctly describe the project, shall state where bid blanks and specifications may be secured, and shall state the time and place for the receiving and opening of sealed bids.
(1) Published Notice. Notice inviting bids shall be published at least fourteen calendar days before the date of opening the bids in a newspaper of general circulation, printed, and published in the city.
(2) Construction Trade Journals. The notice inviting formal bids shall also be mailed, and emailed to all construction trade journals, and posted on the city’s website, or other website used for bidding on public projects, as specified by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission in accordance with the requirements of Section 22036 of the Public Contract Code.
(b) Bidder’s Security. All bids presented in connection with the public project shall be accompanied by bidder’s security in the form and amount prescribed by Public Contract Code Section 20170 et seq., which security shall be dealt with as prescribed therein. In all cases bidders shall be entitled to return of bid security provided that a successful bidder shall forfeit his or her bid security upon refusal or failure to execute the contract within ten days after the notice of award of contract has been mailed unless the city is responsible for the delay. The city council may, on refusal or failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract, award it to the next lowest responsible bidder. If the city council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder’s security shall be applied by the city to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. (c) Bid Opening Procedure. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the department identified in the invitation for bid documents and shall be identified as bids on the envelope. Bids shall be opened in public at the time and place stated in the public notice. A tabulation of all bids received shall be open for public inspection during regular business hours for a period of not less than thirty calendar days after the bid opening.
(d) Rejection of Bids or No Bids Received. In its discretion, the city council may reject any and all bids presented and readvertise for bids. If no bids are received, the city council may award the project by negotiated contract.
(e) Award of Contracts. Contracts shall be awarded by the city council to the lowest responsible bidder except as otherwise provided herein. (f) Tie Bids. If two or more bids received are for the same amount or unit price, quality and service being equal, and if the public interest will not permit the delay of readvertising for bids, the city council may accept the one it chooses or accept the lowest bid made by negotiation with the tie bidders or may utilize a public drawing.
63 Item 8 B.
4869-6527-3982 v1
(g) Performance Bonds. The department head shall have authority to require a performance bond before entering into a contract in such amount as he or she finds reasonably necessary to protect the best interests of the city. If the department head requires a performance bond, the form and amount of the bond shall be described in the notice inviting bids.

Section 10. A new Section 3.16.100 Federal Award Projects is hereby added to the Capitola Municipal Code as set forth below.

Federal Procurement: Any procurement made pursuant to a federal award or subject to reimbursement, in whole or in part, with federal funds must comply with the City’s procurement procedures, state law, and the applicable Federal Procurement Requirements, including 2 CFR § 200.322 (“Procurement of recovered materials”), 2 CFR § 200.323 (“Contract cost and price”), 2 CFR § 200.324 (“Federal awarding agency or passthrough entity review”), 2 CFR § 200.325 (“Bonding requirements”), and 2 CFR § 200.326 (“Contract provisions”). In the event of any conflict between City, state, or federal requirements, the most stringent requirement must be used. (See 2 CFR § 200.318.) City employees must comply with funding agency requests for review of technical specifications or procurement documents as provided in 2 CFR § 200.324.

Section 11. Environmental Review.

The City Council finds and determines that amendment of this Ordinance, which regulates City purchasing procedures, is an administrative activity and not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of this Ordinance may have significant effect on the environment. If this action is determined to be a project, it is exempt from review pursuant to the “common sense” exemption in CEQA Guidelines section 15601(b)(3).

Section 12. Effective Date.

This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from its passage and adoption.

Section 13. Severability.

The City Council hereby declares every section, paragraph, sentence, cause, and phrase of this ordinance is severable. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason found to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases.

Section 14. Certification.

The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be posted and/or published in the manner required by law.
64 Item 8 B.
4869-6527-3982 v1
This Ordinance was introduced at the meeting of the City Council on the ___ day of _______ 2023, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ___ day of _______ 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Margaux Keiser, Mayor
Attest: ___________________________
Julia Moss, City Clerk

Approved as to form:
___________________________________
Samantha W. Zutler, City Attorney
65 Item 8 B.

Capitola Municipal Code
Chapter 3.16 PURCHASING AND PURCHASING

CONTRACTS

The Capitola Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 1061, passed June 22, 2023. 4857-9880-0510 v1
Chapter 3.16

PURCHASING AND PURCHASING CONTRACTS
Sections:

3.16.010 Purpose.

3.16.020 Limitations.

3.16.030 General procedural requirements.

3.16.040 Definitions.

3.16.045 Contractors list.

3.16.050 City manager authority.

3.16.060 City manager delegation of purchasing authority.

3.16.070 Informal purchases – Purchases under five thousand dollars.

3.16.075 Open market purchases – Purchases between five thousand dollars and twenty-five thousand dollars.

3.16.080 Formal purchases – General services, supplies, and equipment greater than twenty-five thousand dollars.

3.16.085 Alternative Bid Procedures for Public Projects

3.16.090 Public Projects Informal Bid Procedures

3.16.095 Public Projects Formal Bid Procedures

3.16.100 Federal Award Projects
* Prior ordinance history: Ords. 120 and 425.

3.16.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to:

A. Provide for the authority of city officers to enter into certain contracts in which funds have been appropriated without a formal city council approval of the specific contract or transaction and to set forth procedural requirements; and
B. Establish efficient procedures for the purchase of supplies, equipment, general services, and public projects at the lowest possible cost commensurate with quality needed, to exercise positive financial control over purchases to clearly define authority for the purchasing function, and to assure the quality of purchases; and
C. To inform those wishing to contract with the city of the authority of the city employee or official to create a binding contract; and
D. To assist the city treasurer in carrying out his or her duties under Government Code Section 41001. (Ord. 972 § 1, 2012; Ord. 832, 2001)

3.16.020 Limitations.

The authority created by this chapter applies only to contracts, the predominant purchase of which is the purchase by the city of goods or services; and the city’s primary performance under such 66 Item 8 B.

Capitola Municipal Code
Chapter 3.16 PURCHASING AND PURCHASING

CONTRACTS

The Capitola Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 1061, passed June 22, 2023. 4857-9880-0510 v1
contract is the payment of money. This chapter does not confer authority to authorize the payment of money for grants, gifts, or other expenditure that is without consideration.

Authority conferred in this chapter upon the city manager applies to situations in which an interim city manager is serving or in situations in which the city manager has appointed an acting city manager. (Ord. 972 § 1, 2012; Ord. 832, 2001)

3.16.030 General procedural requirements.

All contracts must be in writing and be signed in the name of the city. They may be transmitted by facsimile, electronic mail, or digital signature consistent with the City’s electronic signature policy. (Ord. 972 § 1, 2012; Ord. 832, 2001)

3.16.040 Definitions.

For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:

A. “Best value” means the best value to the city based on all factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

1. Cost;

2. The ability, capacity, and skill of the contractor to perform the contract or provide the supplies, services or equipment required;

3. The ability of the contractor to provide the supplies, services, or equipment promptly or within the time specified without delay or interference;

4. The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience, and efficiency of the contractor;

5. The quality of the contractor’s performance on previous purchases or contracts with the city;

6. The ability of the contractor to provide future maintenance, repair, parts, and services for the use of the supplies purchased;

7. The contractor’s ability to supply or act in a timely manner;

8. Compliance by the contractor with federal acts, executive orders, and state statutes governing nondiscrimination in employment;

9. The results of any evaluation relating to performance and price, such as testing, life-cycle costing, and analysis of service, maintenance, and technical data.

B. “Change order” means a change or addendum of an executed contract.

C. “Consultant or professional services” means the services of an attorney, engineer, doctor, financial consultant, planning or environmental consultant, investment advisor, bank, or trustee officer, or other professional.

D. “Contract” means any agreement to do or not do a certain thing. “Contract” and “agreement” are synonymous. The term “contract” includes, but is not limited to, a purchase order, a contract for services, an addendum or change order or a letter agreement. 67 Item 8 B.

Capitola Municipal Code
Chapter 3.16 PURCHASING AND PURCHASING

CONTRACTS

The Capitola Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 1061, passed June 22, 2023. 4857-9880-0510 v1
E. “Emergency” means a sudden, unexpected occurrence that poses a clear and imminent danger, requiring immediate action to prevent or mitigate the loss or impairment of life, health, property, or essential public services, or proclaimed pursuant to Section 8.08.060.

F. “General services” means and includes any work performed or services rendered by an independent contractor, with or without the furnishing of materials, including, but not limited to, the following:

1. Maintenance work as defined in Section 22002(d) of the Public Contract Code. a. Routine, recurring, and usual work for the preservation or protection of any publicly owned or publicly operated facility for its intended purposes, b. Minor repainting,
c. Resurfacing of streets and highways at less than one inch, d. Landscape maintenance, including mowing, watering, trimming, pruning, planting, replacement of plants, and servicing of irrigation and sprinklers systems, e. Work performed to keep, operate, and maintain publicly owned water, power, or waste disposal systems, including, but not limited to, dams, reservoirs, power plants, and electrical transmission lines of two hundred thirty thousand volts and higher;

2. Repair, modifications and maintenance of city equipment and software;

3. Cleaning, analysis, testing, moving, removal, or disposal (other than by sale) of city supplies and equipment;

4. Providing temporary personnel services;

5. Providing other miscellaneous services to facilitate city operations;

6. Performing repair, demolition or other work required to abate nuisances under this code;

7. Licensing software;

8. Leasing or rental of equipment (personal property) for use by the city;

9. A maintenance agreement for equipment owned or leased by the city. “General services” does not include:
a. Work defined as public projects that must be put out to bid pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22002(c);
b. Items such as meals or transportation, which personally are consumed or utilized by the individual who contracts for the item.
68 Item 8 B.

Capitola Municipal Code
Chapter 3.16 PURCHASING AND PURCHASING

CONTRACTS

The Capitola Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 1061, passed June 22, 2023. 4857-9880-0510 v1
G. “Public project” is defined by Section 22002(c) of the Public Contract Code as construction, reconstruction, erection, alteration, renovation, improvement, demolition, and repair work involving any publicly owned, leased, or operating facility. It also includes painting or repainting of any publicly owned, leased, or operated facility. Section 20002(d) does not include maintenance work included in subsection (F)(1).

H. “Supplies and equipment” means and includes all such items purchased on behalf of the city except for supplies or materials finished for a public project. (Ord. 972 § 1, 2012; Ord. 832, 2001)

3.16.045 Contractors list.

A list of contractors shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the provisions of Section 22034 of the Public Contract Code. (Ord. 972 § 1, 2012)

3.16.050 City manager authority.

A. The city manager is authorized to enter into and sign for and on behalf of the city, without the prior approval of the city council, a contract:

1. Which contains an initial maximum compensation figure of fifty thousand dollars or less, or a change order not exceeding fifty thousand dollars. (Cumulative additional orders exceeding fifty thousand dollars must be approved by the city council);

2. Contracts for single capital equipment purchases that do not exceed seventy-five thousand dollars; which are clearly defined and identified in the budget;

3. For which moneys have been appropriated; and

4. For which he or she determines the city has made reasonable efforts to obtain the best value.

B. In an emergency (as defined in Section 3.16.040), the city manager may authorize the expenditure of any unencumbered moneys in the emergency reserve fund, notwithstanding the fact that such moneys may not have been appropriated for such purpose, to the extent that other moneys have not been appropriated or are otherwise unavailable therefor.

C. Contracts wherein all the city’s costs will be reimbursed pursuant to an existing separate contract. (Ord. 972 § 1, 2012; Ord. 832, 2001)

3.16.060 City manager delegation of purchasing authority.

Providing the city manager first establishes written procedures, the city manager may delegate the purchasing authority for other city employees to enter into contracts for purchases of general services or supplies and equipment for twenty-five thousand dollars or less. (Ord. 972 § 1, 2012; Ord. 832, 2001)

3.16.070 Informal purchases General services, supplies, and equipment – Purchases under five thousand dollars.

Purchases under five thousand dollars may be made by persons authorized by Section 3.16.060 in the open market. There are no specific bidding requirements for these purchases; however competitive bidding should be used whenever practical. Quotations for these purchases may be 69 Item 8 B.

Capitola Municipal Code
Chapter 3.16 PURCHASING AND PURCHASING

CONTRACTS

The Capitola Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 1061, passed June 22, 2023. 4857-9880-0510 v1
written or verbal. All purchases subject to this section will be awarded by the department either by voucher or purchase order. (Ord. 972 § 1, 2012; Ord. 832, 2001)

3.16.075 Open market purchases - General services, supplies, and equipment – Purchases between five thousand dollars and twenty-five thousand dollars.

The purchase of supplies, equipment, and general services of a value from five thousand dollars to twenty-five thousand dollars may be made by persons authorized by Section 3.16.060 in the open market, following the procedure prescribed in this section and the city manager’s procedures.

A. Request for Quotes or Proposals.

1. Supplies, Equipment, and General Services Between Five Thousand Dollars and TwentyFive Thousand Dollars. Open-market purchases shall, whenever feasible, be based on at least three quotations. The purchasing employee shall solicit quotations by written request or telephone to prospective vendors. Telephone quotations shall be memorialized in a contemporaneous writing.

2. 2. Exceptions. The quotation procedure under this section may be dispensed with for purchases between five thousand dollars and twenty-five thousand dollars where supplies and equipment are purchased through cooperative purchasing arrangements with the state or other group of multiple governmental entities.

B. Quotes / Proposals – Retention. Quotations and proposals shall be submitted to the finance director who shall keep a record of all open-market orders and quotes for a period of one year after the submission of quotes or placing of orders. This record is open to public inspection. For a purchase in an amount between five thousand dollars and twenty-five thousand dollars, the quotations shall be written (including facsimile and electronic mail).

C. Rejection. The purchasing authority may reject:

1. Any quotations or proposals which fail to meet the specific purchase requirements in any respect; or

2. All quotations or proposals, for any reason whatsoever, and may invite new quotations or proposals.

D. Award of Contract. A contract shall be awarded to the quotation or proposal representing the best value as defined in Section 3.16.040. The basis upon which the award is made shall be in writing.

3.16.080 Formal purchases – General services, supplies, and equipment greater than twentyfive thousand dollars.

A. Request for quotes or proposals shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

1. A general description of the item(s) or services to be purchased;

2. The location where quote or proposal specifications may be secured; 70 Item 8 B.

Capitola Municipal Code
Chapter 3.16 PURCHASING AND PURCHASING

CONTRACTS

The Capitola Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 1061, passed June 22, 2023. 4857-9880-0510 v1

3. The location and deadline for submission of quote or proposal.

B. Notices requesting quotes or proposals shall be made as follows:

1. For supplies, general services, and equipment, notices inviting quotes or proposals shall be published on the City’s website.

2. The city may also give such other notice as it deems appropriate.

C. Rejection of quotes or proposals. The purchasing authority may reject:

1. Any quote or proposal that fails to meet the bidding requirements in any respect; or

2. All quotes or proposals, for any reason whatsoever, and may readvertise for new bids or abandon the purchase;
F. Quotes or Proposals – None Received. If no quotes or proposals are received the purchase may be made through negotiated contract or other process approved by the finance director.

G. Contract Award. Subject to the approval of the city manager, contracts shall be awarded by the purchasing authority to the quote or proposal which represents the best value to the city as defined in Section 3.16.040, except as follows:

1. If two or more quotes or proposals received are for the same total amount or unit price, quality and service being equal, and if the discretion of the purchasing authority the public interest will not permit the delay of readvertising for quotes or proposals, then the purchasing authority may accept the one he or she chooses or the lowest quote or proposal obtained through subsequent negotiation with tied submitters.

2. Exceptions. The quotation procedure under this section may be dispensed with for purchases greater than twenty-five thousand dollars where supplies and equipment are purchased through cooperative purchasing arrangements with the state or other group of multiple governmental entities.3. Sellers, vendors, suppliers, and contractors who maintain places of business located within the limit of the city shall be given preference, if quality, price, service, and all other factors are equal.

The basis upon which the award is made shall be in writing.

I. Insurance. Insurance requirements will be provided via purchase order terms and conditions, or request for proposal terms and conditions information, or city contract. (Ord. 972 § 1, 2012)

3.16.085 – Alternative Bid Procedures for Public Projects Public projects, as defined by the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, Section 22000 et seq., of the Public Contract Code, may be let to contract alternative bidding procedures, in a manner consistent with the applicable dollar thresholds, as set forth in Section 22032 of the Public 71 Item 8 B.

Capitola Municipal Code
Chapter 3.16 PURCHASING AND PURCHASING

CONTRACTS

The Capitola Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 1061, passed June 22, 2023. 4857-9880-0510 v1
Contract Code, as may be amended from time to time and as set forth in Section 3.16.090 and

3.16.095.

3.16.090 Public Projects – Informal Bid Procedures
Where a public project is to be performed, and is eligible to utilize the informal bidding provisions of subsection (b) of Section 22032 of the Public Contract Code, as may be amended from time to time, the following procedures shall apply:
(a) A notice inviting abbreviated bids shall be mailed or emailed to all contractors for the category of work to be bid, as shown on the list developed in accordance with Section 4.04.071, and to all construction trade journals as specified by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission in accordance with Section 22036 of the Public Contract Code, unless the product or service is proprietary. Additional contractors and/or construction trade journals may be notified at the discretion of the department soliciting bids; provided however:
(1) If there is no list of qualified contractors maintained by the city for the particular category of work performed, the notice inviting bids shall be sent only to the construction trade journals specified by the commission.
(2) If the product or service is proprietary in nature such that it can be obtained only from a certain contractor or contractors, the notice inviting abbreviated bids may be sent exclusively to such contractor or contractors.
(b) All mailing of notices to contractors and construction trade journals pursuant to subsection (a) shall be completed not less than ten calendar days before bids are due. (c) The notice inviting informal bids shall describe the project in general terms and how to obtain more detailed information about the project and state the time and place for the submission of bids.
(d) For public projects that are under seventy-five thousand dollars and have followed these informal bidding procedures, the city manager may award the contract. (e) If all bids received are in excess of two hundred thousand dollars, or the limits established by subsection (d) of Section 22034 of the Public Contract Code, whichever is higher, the city council, by adoption of a resolution by a four-fifths vote, may award the contract, at no more than two hundred twelve thousand five hundred dollars, or the limit established by subsection (d) of Section 22034 of the Public Contract Code, whichever is higher, to the lowest responsible bidder, if it determines the cost estimate was reasonable.

3.16.095 Public Projects – Formal Bid Procedures
Contracts for public projects as defined by the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, Section 22000 et seq., of the Public Contract Code, in an amount exceeding the current limit as 72 Item 8 B.

Capitola Municipal Code
Chapter 3.16 PURCHASING AND PURCHASING

CONTRACTS

The Capitola Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 1061, passed June 22, 2023. 4857-9880-0510 v1
specified in subsection (c) of Section 22032 of the Public Contract Code, as may be amended from time to time, shall be accomplished using the formal bidding procedure described in this section. (a) Notice Inviting Bids. Notices inviting bids shall distinctly describe the project, shall state where bid blanks and specifications may be secured, and shall state the time and place for the receiving and opening of sealed bids.
(1) Published Notice. Notice inviting bids shall be published at least fourteen calendar days before the date of opening the bids in a newspaper of general circulation, printed, and published in the city.
(2) Construction Trade Journals. The notice inviting formal bids shall also be mailed, and emailed to all construction trade journals, and posted on the city’s website, or other website used for bidding on public projects, as specified by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission in accordance with the requirements of Section 22036 of the Public Contract Code. (b) Bidder’s Security. All bids presented in connection with the public project shall be accompanied by bidder’s security in the form and amount prescribed by Public Contract Code Section 20170 et seq., which security shall be dealt with as prescribed therein. In all cases bidders shall be entitled to return of bid security provided that a successful bidder shall forfeit his or her bid security upon refusal or failure to execute the contract within ten days after the notice of award of contract has been mailed unless the city is responsible for the delay. The city council may, on refusal or failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract, award it to the next lowest responsible bidder. If the city council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder’s security shall be applied by the city to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. (c) Bid Opening Procedure. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the department identified in the invitation for bid documents and shall be identified as bids on the envelope. Bids shall be opened in public at the time and place stated in the public notice. A tabulation of all bids received shall be open for public inspection during regular business hours for a period of not less than thirty calendar days after the bid opening.
(d) Rejection of Bids or No Bids Received. In its discretion, the city council may reject any and all bids presented and readvertise for bids. If no bids are received, the city council may award the project by negotiated contract.
(e) Award of Contracts. Contracts shall be awarded by the city council to the lowest responsible bidder except as otherwise provided herein.
(f) Tie Bids. If two or more bids received are for the same amount or unit price, quality and service being equal, and if the public interest will not permit the delay of readvertising for bids, the city council may accept the one it chooses or accept the lowest bid made by negotiation with the tie bidders or may utilize a public drawing.
(g) Performance Bonds. The department head shall have authority to require a performance bond before entering into a contract in such amount as he or she finds reasonably necessary to 73 Item 8 B.

Capitola Municipal Code
Chapter 3.16 PURCHASING AND PURCHASING

CONTRACTS

The Capitola Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 1061, passed June 22, 2023. 4857-9880-0510 v1
protect the best interests of the city. If the department head requires a performance bond, the form and amount of the bond shall be described in the notice inviting bids.

3.16.100 Federal Award ProjectsFederal Procurement: Any procurement made pursuant to a federal award or subject to reimbursement, in whole or in part, with federal funds must comply with the City’s procurement procedures, state law, and the applicable Federal Procurement Requirements, including 2 CFR § 200.322 (“Procurement of recovered materials”), 2 CFR § 200.323 (“Contract cost and price”), 2 CFR § 200.324 (“Federal awarding agency or passthrough entity review”), 2 CFR § 200.325 (“Bonding requirements”), and 2 CFR § 200.326 (“Contract provisions”). In the event of any conflict between City, state, or federal requirements, the most stringent requirement must be used. (See 2 CFR § 200.318.) City employees must comply with funding agency requests for review of technical specifications or procurement documents as provided in 2 CFR § 200.324. 74 Item 8 B.

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
Number: III-4
Issued: August 29, 2002
Revised: 3/9/06
7/26/12
10/27/16
9/14/23
Jurisdiction: City Council

PURCHASING & PROCUREMENT POLICY

PURPOSE
To establish policies and procedures to establish efficient procedure, secure supplies, services and equipment at the lowest possible cost, maintain financial control over purchases, define authority in the purchasing system, and assure quality of purchases.

POLICY
The Purchasing and Procurement Policy has been developed in order to achieve the following objectives:

A. Establish authority, responsibility, and accountability for purchasing activities conducted on behalf of the City.

B. Ensure competition and impartiality in all purchasing transactions to the maximum extent possible.

C. Standardize procedures where appropriate to ensure that City-wide policies and goals are achieved.

D. Maintain department responsibility, initiative, and flexibility in evaluating, selecting, and purchasing goods and services.

E. Implement simple yet effective internal control procedures that appropriately support planning, maximize productive use of public funds, and protect City assets from unauthorized use.

F. Communicate City-wide purchasing goals, policies and procedures to departmental staff involved in purchasing activities.

G. Decentralize decision-making to the maximum extent possible consistent with prudent review and internal control procedures.

AUTHORITY
The City’s purchasing ordinance delegates purchasing authority to the City Manager, as well as any other representatives designated by the City Manager. The maximum purchasing authority level of the City Manager is defined in Section 3.16.050 of the Capitola Municipal Code as $50,000; with the exception of single capital equipment purchases that do not exceed $75,000 and are approved in the budget.
75 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

Each year, the City Manager will approve purchasing authority levels on an Expenditure Authorization Form. The delegated purchasing levels shall not exceed the City Manger’s purchasing authority.

The City Manager also has the authority to approve individual changes orders up $50,000. If cumulative change orders exceed $50,000, or 10% of the original contract amount, they must be approved by City Council.

RESPONSIBILITY
The City maintains a decentralized purchasing system; and Department Heads are responsible for distributing, advertising, collecting and evaluating all procurement activities conducted within their Departments with Finance Department assistance.

A. Employees – Each employee is responsible for following these practices. Violation of this policy may result in disciplinary action, termination of employment, or criminal prosecution.

B. Department Heads – Department Heads are responsible for ensuring that all employees of their department who conduct purchasing activities possess a thorough understanding of these standards of ethical conduct and prohibited practices.

C. City Manager – The City Manager is responsible for ensuring that all Department Heads who conduct purchasing activities possess a thorough understanding of these standards of ethical conduct and prohibited practices.

Additional purchasing responsibilities are outlined in the chart presented below:
76 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

Purchasing System Responsibilities
Purchasing Policies and Ordinance
- Adopts Purchasing Ordinance
- Approves Purchasing and Procurement Policy
City Council -
- Delegates authority to award contracts to the City Manager - Awards contracts if they exceed the budgeted amount
Purchasing Policies, Ordinances, and Resolutions
- Implements purchasing policies
- Delegates purchasing authority
City Manager - Awards major contracts
-
Approves Bids/RFP's
(Contingent upon Council approval in the budget)
- Approves single Capital Equipment purchases up to $75,000 (Contingent upon Council approval in the budget)
Administrative Policies and Procedures
- Develops and implements purchasing guidelines
-
Monitors and evaluates system performance
Maintains financial project files for Capital Project over $50,000 Finance Department - Sets payment schedule
- Approves authorized purchase orders up to $50,000
- Assists departments with purchasing needs
Organization Wide Procedures
- Develops and implements departmental purchasing procedures Department Heads - Delegates department purchasing authority - Approves major departmental purchases
Department Procedures
- Purchases, receives, and pays for goods and services in accordance with the City and departmental guidelines
Authorized Employees - Prepares necessary bid documents - Maintains required purchasing records
- Manages department inventories
77 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

PURCHASING STANDARDS OF CONDUCT
Every employee or official engaged in purchasing activities on behalf of the City is required to employ the following standards of conduct:
o Consider the interests of the City first, in all transactions o Carry-out established policies of the City
o Seek to obtain the maximum value for each expenditure of public funds o Inspect materials, supplies and equipment delivered to determine their conformance with the specifications set forth in the order or contract
o Maintain confidentiality of information furnished by vendors and/or contractors regarding price, terms, performance specifications, or other data prior to a bid opening. All information that is presented during the public bid opening will be made available after the award.

The following practices are specifically prohibited in performing purchasing activities on behalf of the City:
o Having a financial or personal beneficial interest (directly or indirectly) in any contract or purchase
o Accepting or receiving (directly or indirectly) from any person, firm, or corporation to who any contract or purchase order may be awarded any money or anything of value, or promise or obligation or contract for future reward or compensation. Inexpensive advertising items bearing the name of the firm - such as pencils, pens, paperweights, or calendars - are not considered articles of value or gifts in relation to the policy o Using position or status in the City to solicit (directly or indirectly) business of any kind; or to purchase products at special discounts or upon special concessions for private use from any person or firm who sells or solicits sales to the City. o Dividing purchases with the intent to circumvent the purchasing authority levels

DELEGATION OF CONTRACTING AUTHORITY
A. The City Council retains all contracting authority not specifically delegated in this Policy.

This Policy shall supersede all ordinances, resolutions and policies related to the City’s procurement system adopted prior to adoption of this Policy. In the event of an inconsistency between this Policy and any prior ordinances, resolutions or policies of the City Council, this Policy shall control.
78 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

B. Any delegation of contracting authority contained in this Policy shall only be exercised (a) in accordance with state law, City ordinances and adopted City policies, as applicable, and (b) only if adequate funds have been included in the approved City Budget for the applicable year or otherwise appropriated by the City Council.

CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACT REVIEW
The City Attorney shall approve all contracts, including amendments to contracts, as to form and legality prior to the execution of the contract by the authorized City official. The City Attorney’s approval shall be evidenced by his or her signature on the contract. City Attorney approval on change orders to public projects is not required, but may be requested, at the discretion of the City Manager or Department Head.

LOCAL VENDOR PREFERENCE
Departments are encouraged to do business with Capitola-based businesses due to the benefit to the community and the advantages in timing and availability. This preference should be given whenever it is legal, economical, and results in competitive product or service. Purchasers will actively seek to identify local vendors interested and able to conduct business with the City of Capitola. It is important that purchasers include in their inquiry or invitation to bid, the opportunity for vendors to identify themselves as local and to provide necessary supporting evidence (see definition of local vendor).

Bids, quotes, or offers submitted by Capitola-based vendors will be credited with the current local (City) sales tax and local (City) transactions & use tax in effect. This net bid will be used to compare bids. In the event of a tie, bids submitted by Capitola vendors will be given preference.

A. Purchasing goods and services from local vendors is desired because it stimulates the local economy and recognizes that our local vendors are valued members of our community. If factors such as quality, previous performance, and availability are equal among vendors, a vendor whose business is located within the City limits shall be awarded a contract if their quote or bid is within 5% of the low bid.

B. Local preference does not apply to public projects, purchases procured under federal or state requirements, or cooperative purchases with other agencies.

C. The vendor must have a valid City business license and employ at least one full-time employee located at a City business address.

D. Local bidders must bid with the same specification as required of non-local bidders.

ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLES
Vehicles powered by clean alternative fuels as defined by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 and other energy efficient advanced technology vehicles shall be given consideration when purchasing new and replacement fleet vehicles
79 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

TERMINOLOGY
Best Value (Lowest Responsible Bidder): Best value is largely based on cost; however, the following factors could be considered in awarding a contract: Skills of the contractor, ability to provide supplies or services; timely processing; and compliance with governing statutes. The complete definition of best value is provided in Section 3.16.040 (A) of the Municipal Code.

Bid: Formal process to obtain lowest responsive responsible bidder or price for materials, supplies and services, and equipment
Consultant or Professional Services: Services of an attorney, engineer, doctor, financial consultant, planning or environmental consultant, investment advisor, bank or trustee office, or other professional Contract: A written agreement between two or more persons setting forth a matter of performance and compensation or consideration given for the performance. The term contract includes, but is not limited to; purchase orders, contract for services, an addendum or change order or a letter agreement.

Local Business (Local vendor/Capitola-based business): Any business which has a retail outlet within city limits of the City of Capitola and holds the required licenses and permits for conducting its business within the City.

Maintenance: Routine, recurring, and usual work for the preservation or protection of any publicly owned or publicly operated facility for its intended purposes. It also includes minor painting, resurfacing of streets less than one inch; and landscape maintenance. This definition is provided in Section 22002 (c) of the Public Contract Code and should be contrasted with Public Project.

Open Market Purchases: Purchases of supplies, equipment, and general services from $5,000 - $25,000.

Over the Counter or Informal Purchases: Purchases under $5,000 made by authorized personnel.

Petty Cash: Cash used to reimburse authorized purchases up to $80. All reimbursements must be accompanied by a receipt.

Public Project: Construction, reconstruction, erection, alteration, renovation, improvement, demolition, and repair work involving any publicly owned, leased, or operated facility. This can also include the painting or repainting of publicly owned, leased, or operated facility. This definition is provided in Section 22002 (c) of the Public Contract Code and should be contrasted with the definition of Maintenance.

Purchase Order: A document used to acknowledge acceptable of a bid quotation or offer, and a contractual relationship is established upon its issuance and acceptance by the vendor.

Request for Proposal (RFP): An offer in to provide materials, supplies or services where the City selects vendor/consultant usually based upon criteria specified in Request for Proposal such as competence, qualifications and expertise in the field. Price is not the sole basis for selection, but may be considered in the criteria for evaluating proposals. Typically used for consultant or professional service contracts.
80 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

General Services: Any work performed or services rendered by an independent contractor, with or without the furnishing of materials such as a professional consultant.

Sole Source: Sole source purchases are used where no secondary source is reasonably available precluding the use of a competitive process.

ENCUMBRANCE OF FUNDS
A. Except in cases of emergency, or by order of the City Council, purchase orders shall not be issued unless there exists an unencumbered appropriation in the department budget against which the purchase order is to be charged.

B. Purchase orders do not roll over from one fiscal year to the next if unused, except for contract and professional services procured by an approved contract with terms that cross fiscal years.

All other purchase orders shall be used in the fiscal year they were issued. In the event a planned purchase is delayed and will not occur until the next fiscal year, a new purchase order must be requested by the Department Head in the new fiscal year. For budget purposes, expenditures for goods or services will be realized based upon the date the order/service is received.

C. Invoices shall not be coded based upon budget lines that have unused/available funds. Invoices shall be coded to the correct budget line item according to the nature of the goods or services provided. It is the responsibility of the Department Head to request budget adjustments as needed to allow for the correct coding of invoices.

UNLAWFUL PURCHASES OR CONTRACTS
If any officer or employee purchases or contracts for any goods or services contrary to the provisions of these Procedures, such purchase order or contract may be void and of no effect. The staging or splitting of the purchase of goods or procurement of services, without proper justification or to avoid the authorization limits, is prohibited.

RECORD KEEPING
Each department is responsible for maintaining its own purchasing and contracting records when formal council action was not required. ALL ORIGINAL, EXECUTED CONTRACTS MUST BE

PROVIDED TO THE CITY CLERK, WHO SHALL MAINTAIN SUCH ORIGINAL EXECUTED CONTRACTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY’S RETENTION SCHEDULE REGARDLESS OF THE REQUIRED APPROVAL LEVEL (i.e. Department Head, City Manager, City Council). Upon expiration of the term of a contract for any reason, any bids, specifications, and other pertinent data shall be retained by the department in accordance with the City’s adopted document retention schedule. These are public records and available for public inspection upon request.

SHARED FOLDER
In order to ensure proper record keeping a shared folder shall be created to track all aspects of a project. A list of items to be kept electronic include: bid documents, contract, change orders, purchase 81 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

orders, invoices, and communications that impact the overall project. Each department is responsible to save a copy of their responsible aspects of the project to the shared folder. The shared folder can also include the Financial Accounting System documents.

PURCHASING SYSTEM OVERVIEW
A general overview of the City’s purchasing procedures; thresholds, and responsibilities are presented in the following charts. Detailed procedures for each Purchasing Category are provided in subsequent sections of this policy:
82 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

Purchasing System Chart
Scope Category Features
- No Specific requirements
Less than $5,000
- Competitive bidding to be used when practical
- Bid award by department
Supplies
Equipment
Operating Services $5,000 - $25,000 -
Department solicits, and documents, at least three
proposals
Maintenance Services - Public projects require noticing - Bid award by Finance via purchase order
Professional Services(1)
- Formal Bid/RFP documents
- Advertising for sealed bids/proposals
Greater than
$25,000 -
City Manager approves Bid/RFP document and
the solicitation of bids/proposals
- Contract award generally delegated by Council
to the City Manager if within budget
- Informal Bid/RFP documents
- Solicit a minimum of three bids/proposals,
Capital Equipment advertise if appropriate
(Authorized in Budget) $25,001 - $75,000
(Authorized in Budget) - City Manager approves Bid/RFP document and soliciting bids/proposals
- Bid awarded by Finance via purchase order
Public projects, as defined by the Uniform Public
Construction Cost Accounting Act, Section
22000 et seq., of the Public Contract Code, may
be let to contract alternative bidding procedures,
in a manner consistent with the applicable dollar
thresholds, as set forth in Section 22032 of
the Public Contract Code, as may be amended
from time to time
-
Public Projects
Alternative Bid
Procedures
-
-
(1) Additional information related to Professional Services/RFP’s is provided in the Supplemental Information Section. 83 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

(2) The Capitola Municipal Code and this Administrative Procedure provides additional guidelines regarding emergency situations.

PURCHASING CATEGORIES AND PROCEDURES
I. General Purchases under $5,000
 Purchases under $5,000 may be made by an authorized Purchasing Designee. A Department Head, or his/her designee, is authorized to purchase goods or procure services (except professional services) for an amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) or less, if adequate funds have been appropriated by the City Council in the budget. City Council appropriation of funds is required prior to such purchase or procurement.  No competitive process is required, but the Department Head shall endeavor to purchase goods or procure services at the lowest cost commensurate with the quality needed.

II. Open Market Purchases - Purchases between $5,000 and $25,000 The purchase of supplies, equipment, and general services of a value from $5,000 to $25,000 may be made by authorized personnel. An additional bidding requirement is outlined for purchases that are defined as a Public Project.

1. The City Manager, or his/her designee, is authorized to purchase goods or procure services for an amount more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) and up to Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000), if adequate funds have been appropriated by the City Council in the budget.

City Council appropriation of funds is required prior to such purchase or procurement.

2. The department must seek three (3) oral or written quotes and document the receipt of the quotes. The vendor offering the best value, after considering any local preference, shall be selected. For the purchase of goods, if the lowest price quote is not selected, the Department Head shall document in the file the basis for the selection of the vendor.

3. A contract may be required for the purchase of goods, and a contract is required for the procurement of services. All contracts are to be in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Contracts are generally not required for the routine purchase of goods, such as purchasing office supplies, tires or paper goods. However, whenever the purchase of goods involves a special or unique requirement, a contract should be entered into between the City and the vendor. When in doubt regarding whether a contract is required or advisable, consult with the City Attorney.

4. If it is reasonably anticipated by the Department Head that the annual total cost of a particular good or service would exceed $25,000 (excluding public projects), then incremental purchases of that good or service shall be pursuant to a contract approved by the City Council. The contract can be for a per service hour or per item rate but must be renewed according to the procedures set forth in this ordinance at the end of the contract term. For example, if a department normally purchases 300 tires annually at a cost exceeding $25,000 overall, which would require the department to seek (3) three oral or written quotes and the approval of the City Council if the purchase was completed all at once, then incremental purchases of 50 tires shall be pursuant to a contract specifying the per tire rate approved by the City Council. The contract shall be valid for a minimum of one (1) year and it is the responsibility of the Department Head to ensure each invoice received from the consultant is calculated at the 84 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

approved rate. The purpose of this provision is to achieve uniformity and savings in the costs associated with goods or services provided by the same contractor/vendor.

5. The staging or splitting of the purchase of goods or procurement of services, without proper justification or to avoid the authorization limits, is prohibited.

6. Amendments to a purchase order and/or contract which result in the total amount exceeding the authority of the City Manager shall require City Council approval.

III. Formal Purchases - General, services, supplies, and equipment greater than $25,00 (excluding public works projects as defined by Public Contracting Code section 22002(c)).

A. Request for Quotes/RFP’s shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

1. A general description of the item(s) or services to be purchased;

2. The location where quote/RFP specifications may be secured;

3. 4. The location and deadline for submission of quote/RFP B. Notices requesting Quotes/RFP’s shall be made as follows:

1. For supplies, services, and equipment, notices inviting quotes/RFPs shall be published on the City’s website.

2. The City may also give such other notice as it deems appropriate C. Rejection of Quotes/RFP’s
The purchasing authority may reject:

1. Any quote or proposal that fails to meet the bidding requirements in any respect

2. All quotes or proposals, for any reason whatsoever, and may readvertise for new bids or abandon the purchase

3. In the case of public projects, the council may, by passage of a resolution by a four-fifths vote, declare that the project can be performed more economically by employees of the City and may have the project done by force account
D. Bids/RFP’s - None Received
If no bids are received the purchase may be made through negotiated contract or other process approved by the Finance Director.

E. Contract Award
Subject to the approval of the City Manager, contracts shall be awarded by the purchasing authority to the quote/proposal which represents the best value to the City as defined in Section

3.16.040, except as follows:

1. If two or more quotes/proposals received are for the same total amount or unit price, quality 85 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

and service being equal, and if the discretion of the purchasing authority the public interest will not permit the delay of readvertising for quotes/proposals, then the purchasing authority may accept the one he or she chooses or the lowest quote/proposal obtained through subsequent negotiation with tied submitters.

2. Exceptions. The quotation procedure under this section may be dispensed with for purchases greater than twenty-five thousand dollars where supplies and equipment are purchased through cooperative purchasing arrangements with the state or other group of multiple governmental entities.

3. Sellers, vendors, suppliers and contractors who maintain places of business located within the limit of the City shall be given preference, if quality, price, service, and all other factors are equal.

The basis upon which the award is made shall be in writing.

F. Insurance
Insurance requirements will be provided via Purchase Order terms and conditions, or Request for Proposal terms and conditions information, or City contract.

G. Bidding Process Questions
Any questions received to the Project Manager during the bidding process should be supplied to all plan holders with corresponding answers. If the potential bidder asks the questions verbally, then the project manager shall record the questions and answer given and provide to all plan holders.

H. Change Orders
Projects at times will require change orders. Change Orders can be approved by the City Manager for amounts not to exceed $50,000, or 10% of the original contract, whichever is larger. The change orders, once approved, will be executed by the Finance department, and finance will make corresponding Purchase Order Adjustments.

I. Project Folder
The Department will keep a project folder for contracts over $50,000. The Project Folder will include proof of the Bidding process, copy of bid proposal costs, contract, purchase order, contract amendments, and all associated costs in relations to the project. The project folder shall also have copies of prudent communications. The project folder can be kept electronically on a shared drive and shall be destroyed upon expiration of the applicable retention period as outlined in the City’s retention schedule.

J. Project Closeout
Upon completion of a project, the project shall be closed out with the City Council. In the project closeout the project is accepted as complete thus releasing any and all retention. The closeout will also provide a summary of the budget and total cost of the project. If the project is over budget, then additional funds need to be identified and if the project is under budget then the reallocation of those need to be identified.

IV. Capital Equipment Purchases between $25,001 - $75,000 Section 3.16.050 (A)(2) of the Municipal Code provides the City Manager with the authority to approve contracts for single equipment purchases based on the following criteria:
86 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

 Single equipment purchases are not greater than $75,000  The equipment was clearly identified and described in the budget  City Council approves the capital equipment purchase in the budget  The equipment description listed in the budget is consistent with the item purchased  The final cost does not exceed the amount approved in the budget V. Alternative Bid Procedure for Public Projects – Informal Bid Procedures Public projects, as defined by the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, Section 22000 et seq., of the Public Contract Code, may be let to contract alternative bidding procedures, in a manner consistent with the applicable dollar thresholds, as set forth in Section 22032 of the Public Contract Code, as may be amended from time to time.

Where a public project is to be performed, and is eligible to utilize the informal bidding provisions of subsection (b) of Section 22032 of the Public Contract Code, as may be amended from time to time, the following procedures shall apply:
(a) A notice inviting abbreviated bids shall be mailed or emailed to all contractors for the category of work to be bid, as shown on the list developed in accordance with Section 3.16.085, and to all construction trade journals as specified by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission in accordance with Section 22036 of the Public Contract Code, unless the product or service is proprietary. Additional contractors and/or construction trade journals may be notified at the discretion of the department soliciting bids; provided however:
(1) If there is no list of qualified contractors maintained by the city for the particular category of work performed, the notice inviting bids shall be sent only to the construction trade journals specified by the commission.
(2) If the product or service is proprietary in nature such that it can be obtained only from a certain contractor or contractors, the notice inviting abbreviated bids may be sent exclusively to such contractor or contractors.
(b) All mailing of notices to contractors and construction trade journals pursuant to subsection (a) shall be completed not less than ten calendar days before bids are due. (c) The notice inviting informal bids shall describe the project in general terms and how to obtain more detailed information about the project and state the time and place for the submission of bids. (d) For public projects that are under seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) and have followed these informal bidding procedures, the city manager may award the contract. (e) If all bids received are in excess of two hundred thousand dollars, or the limits established by subsection (d) of Section 22034 of the Public Contract Code, whichever is higher, the city council, by adoption of a resolution by a four-fifths vote, may award the contract, at no more than two hundred twelve thousand five hundred dollars, or the limit established by subsection (d) of Section 22034 of the Public Contract Code, whichever is higher, to the lowest responsible bidder, if it determines the cost estimate was reasonable.

VI. Public Projects – Formal Bid Procedures
87 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

Contracts for public projects as defined by the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, Section 22000 et seq., of the Public Contract Code, in an amount exceeding the current limit as specified in subsection (c) of Section 22032 of the Public Contract Code, as may be amended from time to time, shall be accomplished using the formal bidding procedure described in this section. (a) Notice Inviting Bids. Notices inviting bids shall distinctly describe the project, shall state where bid blanks and specifications may be secured, and shall state the time and place for the receiving and opening of sealed bids.
(1) Published Notice. Notice inviting bids shall be published at least fourteen calendar days before the date of opening the bids in a newspaper of general circulation, printed, and published in the city.
(2) Construction Trade Journals. The notice inviting formal bids shall also be mailed, and emailed to all construction trade journals, and posted on the city’s website, or other website used for bidding on public projects, as specified by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission in accordance with the requirements of Section 22036 of the Public Contract Code. (b) Bidder’s Security. All bids presented in connection with the public project shall be accompanied by bidder’s security in the form and amount prescribed by Public Contract Code Section 20170 et seq., which security shall be dealt with as prescribed therein. In all cases bidders shall be entitled to return of bid security provided that a successful bidder shall forfeit his or her bid security upon refusal or failure to execute the contract within ten days after the notice of award of contract has been mailed unless the city is responsible for the delay. The city council may, on refusal or failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract, award it to the next lowest responsible bidder. If the city council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder’s security shall be applied by the city to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder.
(c) Bid Opening Procedure. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the department identified in the invitation for bid documents and shall be identified as bids on the envelope. Bids shall be opened in public at the time and place stated in the public notice. A tabulation of all bids received shall be open for public inspection during regular business hours for a period of not less than thirty calendar days after the bid opening.
(d) Rejection of Bids or No Bids Received. In its discretion, the city council may reject any and all bids presented and readvertise for bids. If no bids are received, the city council may award the project by negotiated contract.
(e) Award of Contracts. Contracts shall be awarded by the city council to the lowest responsible bidder except as otherwise provided herein.
(f) Tie Bids. If two or more bids received are for the same amount or unit price, quality and service being equal, and if the public interest will not permit the delay of readvertising for bids, the city council may accept the one it chooses or accept the lowest bid made by negotiation with the tie bidders or may utilize a public drawing.
(g) Performance Bonds. The department head shall have authority to require a performance bond before entering into a contract in such amount as he or she finds reasonably necessary to protect the best interests of the city. If the department head requires a performance bond, the form and amount of the bond shall be described in the notice inviting bids. 88 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

VII. Federal Award Projects
Federal Procurement: Any procurement made pursuant to a federal award or subject to reimbursement, in whole or in part, with federal funds must comply with the City’s procurement procedures, state law, and the applicable Federal Procurement Requirements, including 2 CFR § 200.322 (“Procurement of recovered materials”), 2 CFR § 200.323 (“Contract cost and price”), 2 CFR § 200.324 (“Federal awarding agency or passthrough entity review”), 2 CFR § 200.325 (“Bonding requirements”), and 2 CFR § 200.326 (“Contract provisions”). In the event of any conflict between City, state, or federal requirements, the most stringent requirement must be used. (See 2 CFR § 200.318.) City employees must comply with funding agency requests for review of technical specifications or procurement documents as provided in 2 CFR § 200.324.

VIII. Emergency Procedures
An emergency is defined as an unexpected occurrence or threatened occurrence that poses a danger, requiring immediate action to prevent or mitigate the loss or impairment of life, health, property, or essential public services, or any emergency proclaimed pursuant to Municipal Code 8.08.060.

Upon approval of the City Manager or Finance Director, authorized purchasing authorities may exceed the purchasing limits of $50.000. The following procedures are applicable to emergency purchases:
 Documentation. It will be the responsibility of the requesting department to attach a copy of the written justification of the emergency signed by the City Manager to any invoices at the time the invoice is submitted to accounts payable for payment.  Reporting. All emergency purchases of goods and services over $50,000 will be immediately reported by the department responsible for the purchase to the City Clerk for inclusion as an information item on the Agenda for the next scheduled meeting of the City Council.

In accordance with Chapter 2.5, Section 22050(a) of the Public Contract Code, the information on emergency purchase action shall be presented to the City Council for review and determination, by a four-fifths vote, that there is a need to continue the emergency action. This must occur within seven days after the action, or at the City Council’s next regularly scheduled meeting if that meeting will occur within 14 days after the action. The emergency purchase action shall be presented to the City Council at least at every subsequent regularly scheduled meeting until the action is terminated.

The City Council must determine, by a four-fifth vote, that there is a need to continue the emergency action.

SUPPLEMENTAL PURCHASING INFORMATION
I. Requests for Proposals (RFP)
Request for Proposal (RFP) are typically associated with general or professional service contracts over $5,000. This document requests a firm to submit a proposal to perform the scope of work 89 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

associated with a specific project. Cost is not the sole basis for selection in an RFP, other criteria such as experience, turn-around time, and approach to work are determining factors when evaluating a proposal. Based on the estimated cost of service, the corresponding Open Market, Formal bid, or Alternative Bid procedures are applicable.

Additional information related to the development and criteria of RFP’s is listed below:

A. RFP Requirements
The RFP will be specific to the project and preparation will require some general knowledge of the project. However, preparation of the RFP should not involve any work for which the proposer would normally be compensated during the project. For example, on engineering projects, free preliminary engineering in the RFP should be discouraged. The RFP should address the following:
1) Required Information: In the RFP, the consultant shall be advised of the following requirements:
a. Standard contract requirements
b. Selection criteria.
c. Date and time proposal is due.
d. The name and telephone number of the staff member responsible for the project.
2) Selection & Evaluation Criteria. Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of the evaluation factors listed in the Request for Proposal. Respondents should be ranked based on the selection criteria. As a minimum, the following criteria will be used to evaluate the RFP.
a. Firm experience (including work and project-related references). b. Specific staff experience and availability (including work and projectrelated references). c. Approved methods to accomplish the work.
d. Scope of work and schedule
e. cost
3) Price Considerations. Although price is always a consideration in recommending awarding the final selection, prices will not be a mandatory consideration in the initial evaluation process. At the discretion of the department, a department may opt to adopt an RFP procedure with price information in a separate sealed envelope. The envelopes shall not be opened until the highest rated firm is identified based upon demonstrated competence and professional qualifications. At that time, the price information will be compared to professional qualification to ensure that the price is fair and reasonable.

If a major discrepancy between highest rated firm and the others exist, that discrepancy shall be evaluated and explained before award of the work. If not satisfactorily resolved, the department may to negotiate with the next-highest-ranked firm.

II. Sole Source
90 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

1. Materials, Supplies & Equipment:
a. Definition. Sole source purchases are used where no secondary source is reasonably available precluding the use of a competitive process. The following are examples of circumstances, which could necessitate sole source procurements:
1) Where compatibility of equipment, accessories or replacement parts is an important consideration;
2) Where public utility services are to be procured;
3) Where a sole supplier's item is needed for trial use or testing; 4) Where a used item is offered at a bargain price and subject to prior sale;
5) Where a cooperative purchasing agreement has been developed with another public agency that used a competitive selection process. 6) Where supply proximity is an important consideration.

2. Consultant or General Services:
a. In the case where a consulting firm has satisfactorily performed the previous stage of a project (e.g. a pre-design), or has acquired extensive background and working knowledge, the firm may be selected for followup work without solicitations from other firm upon written justification and recommendation of the department head and approval by the City Manager or designee.
b. If a firm is a highly recognized authority in a field or specialty, or has unique specific knowledge regarding the project, then the firm may be selected without other solicitations for contracts and upon written justification and recommendation of the department head and approval by the City Manager or designee.
c. Upon those infrequent occasions when confidence in the consultant and quality of service are important.

4. Documentation: It is the responsibility of the requesting department to maintain in their files a complete, written justification of the sole source purchase approved by the City Manager

5. Authorization & Reporting: All sole source purchases of more than $50,000 are authorized by the City Council and fully disclosed in the staff agenda report. Sole source purchases between $5,000 and $50,000 are authorized by the City Manager.

Sole source purchases less than $5,000 are authorized by the Department Heads.

III. Multiple Year Contracts

1. Applicability. When it is in the best interest of the City, multiple year contracts will be allowed.

High vendor "startup costs" or the need for continuity may make a multiple year contract 91 Item 8 B.

Administrative Procedure III-4
Purchasing & Procurement

financially or operationally advantageous to the City. Under no circumstances should a multiple year contract be used to avoid competitive procurement procedures.

2. Termination Due to Lack of Funds. All multiple year contracts should contain a clause allowing the City to terminate the contract in thirty (30) days or subsequent fiscal years due to a lack of budgeted funds.

3. Term. The term of a multiple year contract should be clearly delineated. "Open end" contracts will not be used.

4. Authority. Multiple-year contracts are subject to the same authority levels detailed above.

5. Changes. Changes to multiple-year contracts are covered under "Change Orders" below.

6. Extension. Extension of contracts requires the approval of the City Manager via City contract amendment form.

7. Addendum. Increase in dollar amounts on an agreement, which results in an aggregate total in excess of $50,000 requires approval from the City Council.

IV. City Engineer Review and Approval
In accordance with Government Code section 830.6, the City Engineer shall have authority to review and approve the plan or design of any construction work or work of improvement to public property and for contracts for construction subject to approval by the City Manager. For contracts to be awarded by the City Council, the City Engineer shall review such plans and designs and shall recommend the approval of such plan or design by the City Council as part of its award of such contract.

This policy was approved and authorized by:
_______________________________
Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
92 Item 8 B.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: September 28, 2023
From: Public Works Department
Subject: Completion of the Kennedy Drive Sidewalk Project Recommended Action: 1) Accept as complete the Kennedy Drive Sidewalk Project as constructed by Diamond D Concrete; 2) authorize the City Clerk to file and record a Notice of Completion; and 3) authorize the release of the contract retention of $8,560 as prescribed in the contract.

Background: On March 23, 2023, the City Council approved the plans, specifications, and construction estimate for the Kennedy Drive Sidewalk Project and authorized advertising for construction bids with an approved budget of $214,000. Following this approval, the project was advertised, and bids were received on April 12, 2023. The low bid received was from Diamond D Concrete.

On May 5, 2023, the City Manager administratively approved a construction contract for the Kennedy Drive Sidewalk Project with Diamond D Concrete in the amount of $146,495. Three change orders were processed, in the total amount of $24,696, for modifications to irrigation, pavement markings, and reconstruction of the adjacent staircase on Park Avenue, for a total contract cost of $171,191.

Construction of the project began in May 2023 and was completed in September 2023. Staff has inspected the improvements and has determined that these improvements have been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.

Fiscal Impact: The City was awarded $197,000 in Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) funding for the Kennedy Drive Sidewalk Project from the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission (SCCRTC). $8,000 was previously expended on project design. The final construction contract amount for the Kennedy Drive Sidewalk Project is $171,191. The adopted FY 2022-23 Budget included $214,00 for this project. Remaining project funds will remain in the Road Fund and be available for future projects.

Attachments:

1. Notice of Completion

2. Project Cost Summary
Report Prepared By: Jessica Kahn, Public Works Director Reviewed By: Julia Moss, City Clerk; Samantha Zutler, City Attorney Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
93 Item 8 C.

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Capitola
Public Works Department
Attn: Jessica Kahn
420 Capitola Avenue
Capitola, California 95010

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE

THIS INSTRUMENT IS BEING RECORDED FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF CAPITOLA NO RECORDING FEE IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE §27383

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Capitola, owner of the property hereinafter described, whose address is 420 Capitola Avenue, Capitola, California, has caused a work of improvements more particularly described as follows:

PROJECT NAME: Kennedy Drive Sidewalk Project
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Curb, gutter, sidewalk and ADA/bicycle improvements to be constructed on property more particularly described as follows:

DESCRIPTION: Construction of new sidewalk and road repairs to one (1) City street (Kennedy Drive).

ADDRESS: N/A
APN: N/A
The work of the improvement was completed by:

CONTRACTOR: Diamond D Concrete
ADDRESS: 310 Kennedy Drive, Capitola CA 95010
The work of the improvements was actually completed on the 1 st day of September 2023 and accepted
by the City Council of said City on the 28
th day of September 2023.

Signature of City Official: _____________________________ The undersigned certifies that he is an officer of the City of Capitola, that he has read the foregoing Notice of Completion and knows the content thereof; and that the same is true of his own knowledge, except as to those matters which are therein stated on information or belief, and as to those matters that he believes to be true. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed at the City of Capitola, County of Santa Cruz, State of California.

Public Works Director: ___________________________________ Date:__________________ Jessica Kahn
94 Item 8 C.

City of Capitola Public Works
Kennedy Drive SidewalkFinal Cost Summary
ITEM NO. BID ITEM UNIT QTY UNIT PRICE UNIT TOTAL QTY UNIT TOTAL QTY UNIT TOTAL QTY UNIT TOTAL QTY UNIT TOTAL 1 Concrete Curb & Gutter LF 550 $87.50 $48,125 480 $42,000 70 $6,1252 Concrete Sidewalk SF 2750 $23 $62,150 2400 $54,240 350 $7,9103 Concrete Retaining Curb 6” LF 550 $34.98 $19,240 480 $16,791 70 $2,4494 Concrete Curb Ramp (Caltrans Case C) EA 1 $8,615 $8,615 1 $8,6155 Relocate Catch Basin (Type GO Inlet) EA 1 $8,365 $8,365 1 $8,365 CO1 Additional haul & DI's LS 1 $7,816 $7,816 1 $7,816
CO2 Temp Striping & ADA AC conform LS 1 $8,380 $8,380 1 $8,380CO3 Stairs LS 1 $8,500 $8,500 1 $8,500 Total $171,191.00 Total $113,031 Total $33,464 Total $8,500 Total $16,196 5% retention $5,651.56 5% retentio $1,673.19 5% retentio $425.00 5% retentio $809.80 Payment $107,379.71 Payment $31,790.54 Payment $8,075.00 Payment $15,386.20 Progress Payment
#3
Progress Payment
#3
Diamond D Progress Payment
Cost #1
Progress Payment
#2
95 Item 8 C.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: September 28, 2023
From: Public Works Department
Subject: Noble Gulch Culvert Condition Assessment
Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc. for the Noble Gulch Culvert Condition Assessment in the amount of $29,950.

Background: The Noble Gulch culvert is an approximate 500-yard underground structure that channels storm water, composed of concrete box culvert, reinforced concrete pipe, and corrugated metal pipe. In March 2011, the portion of pipe under the current Lower Beach and Village Parking Lot failed.

Immediately after the pipe failure, the City completed permanent repairs to the failed section of pipe. The culvert was inspected by V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc. in 2011 and 2012. In 2013, the City completed the Noble Gulch Pipeline Repair Project to stabilize the remaining section of pipe.

Discussion: Re-evaluation of the Noble Gulch Culvert is necessary to determine if the condition of the culvert has degraded since the initial assessments performed in 2011 and 2012. Staff anticipates this work will be performed in October to December of 2023.

The scope of the project includes field assessment, conducted by a 5-person crew, to document pipe condition, measure deflections, conduct pipe sounding, and evaluation of the pipe condition using standard methods. Following the field assessment, a report will be prepared to summarize the assessment methods, findings, and conclusions. The report will include photographs, data tables, and graphical representations.

The City’s Administrative Policy III-4: Purchasing and Procurement Policy allows sole source consultant services in cases where a consulting firm is a highly recognized authority in a field or specialty or has unique specific knowledge regarding the project. Staff recommends executing a Professional Services Agreement with V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc.as a sole source procurement. V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc. has extensive prior knowledge of the facility and completed similar assessments in 2011 and 2012.

In 2018 the City entered into an agreement with the County of Santa Cruz to jointly do an assessment of the Noble Gulch culvert to determine its overall condition and required maintenance.

Fiscal Impact: The adopted FY 2023-24 General Fund Budget has allocated $50,000 for a Noble Gulch engineering feasibility analysis to assess the current condition and capacity of the Noble Gulch drainage system. Sufficient funds are available.

Attachments:

1. Draft Agreement

2. Sole Source Memo
Report Prepared By: Jessica Kahn, Public Works Director Reviewed By: Julia Moss, City Clerk; Sam Zutler, City Attorney Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
96 Item 8 D.

CITY OF CAPITOLA

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Noble Gulch Culvert Condition Assessment
V&A Consulting Engineers
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on September 28, 2023, by and between the City of Capitola, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter called "City" and V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc. hereinafter called "Consultant".

WHEREAS, City desires certain services described in Appendix One and Consultant is capable of providing and desires to provide these services;
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Consultant for the consideration and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter specified agree as follows:

SECTION 1
Scope of Services
The services to be performed under this Agreement are for the Noble Gulch Culvert Condition Assessment Services and further detailed in Appendix One.

SECTION 2
Duties of Consultant
All work performed by Consultant, or under its direction, shall be sufficient to satisfy the City's objectives for entering into this Agreement and shall be rendered in accordance with the generally accepted practices, and to the standards of, Consultant's profession.

Consultant shall not undertake any work beyond the scope of work set forth in Appendix One unless such additional work is approved in advance and in writing by City. The cost of such additional work shall be reimbursed to Consultant by City on the same basis as provided for in Section 4.

If, in the prosecution of the work, it is necessary to conduct field operations, security and safety of the job site will be the Consultant's responsibility excluding, nevertheless, the security and safety of any facility of City within the job site which is not under the Consultant's control.

Consultant shall meet with Jessica Kahn, Public Works Director, called “Director," or other City personnel, or third parties as necessary, on all matters connected with carrying out of Consultant's services described in Appendix One. Such meetings shall be held at the request of either party hereto. Review and City approval of completed work shall be obtained monthly, or at such intervals as may be mutually agreed upon, during the course of this work.

SECTION 3
Duties of the City
City shall make available to Consultant all data and information in the City's possession which City deems necessary to the preparation and execution of the work, and City shall actively aid and assist Consultant in obtaining such information from other agencies and individuals as necessary.

The Director may authorize a staff person to serve as his or her representative for conferring with Consultant relative to Consultant's services. City shall not control or direct the manner in which the services are to be performed. However, the work in progress hereunder shall be reviewed from time to time by City at the discretion of City or upon the request of Consultant. If the work is satisfactory, it will be approved. 97 Item 8 D.

Professional Services Agreement 9/28/2023
Noble Gulch Culvert Condition Assessment
V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc.

If the work is not satisfactory, City will inform Consultant of the changes or revisions necessary to secure approval.

SECTION 4
Fees and Payment
Payment for the Consultant's services shall be made upon a schedule and within the limit, or limits shown, upon Appendix Two. Such payment shall be considered the full compensation for all personnel, materials, supplies, and equipment used by Consultant in carrying out the work. As per the Fee Proposal provided in Appendix One, such work will be completed at a total cost not to exceed $29,950. If Consultant is compensated on an hourly basis, Consultant shall track the number of hours Consultant, and each of Consultant’s employees, has worked under this Agreement during each fiscal year (July 1 through June 30) and Consultant shall immediately notify City if the number of hours worked during any fiscal year by any of Consultant’s employees reaches 900 hours. In addition, each invoice submitted by Consultant to City shall specify the number of hours to date Consultant, and each of Consultant’s employees, has worked under this Agreement during the current fiscal year.

SECTION 5
Changes in Work
City may order major changes in scope or character of the work, either decreasing or increasing the scope of Consultant's services. No changes in the Scope of Work as described in Appendix One shall be made without the City's written approval. Any change requiring compensation in excess of the sum specified in Appendix Two shall be approved in advance in writing by the City.

SECTION 6
Time of Beginning and Schedule for Completion
This Agreement will become effective when signed by both parties and will terminate on the earlier of:
⚫ The date Consultant completes the services required by this Agreement, as agreed by the City; or ⚫ The date either party terminates the Agreement as provided below.

Work shall begin on or about October 1, 2023.

In the event that major changes are ordered or Consultant is delayed in performance of its services by circumstances beyond its control, the City will grant Consultant a reasonable adjustment in the schedule for completion provided that to do so would not frustrate the City's objective for entering into this Agreement.

Consultant must submit all claims for adjustments to City within thirty calendar days of the time of occurrence of circumstances necessitating the adjustment.

SECTION 7
Termination
City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time upon giving ten days written notice to Consultant. Consultant may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to City should the City fail to fulfill its duties as set forth in this Agreement. In the event of termination, City shall pay the Consultant for all services performed and accepted under this Agreement up to the date of termination. 98 Item 8 D.

Professional Services Agreement 9/28/2023
Noble Gulch Culvert Condition Assessment
V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc.

SECTION 8
Insurance
Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract and for 1 year thereafter, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, or employees.

Minimum Scope of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001).

2. Insurance Services office Form Number CA 0001 covering Automobile Liability, Code 1 (any auto).

3. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, and Employer’s Liability Insurance.

4. Professional (Errors and Omissions) Liability insurance appropriate to the consultant’s profession. Architects’ and engineers’ coverage shall include contractual liability.

Minimum Limits of Insurance
Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:

1. General Liability:
(including operations,
products and completed
operations)
$1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in
aggregate (including operations, for bodily injury,
personal and property damage.

2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. 4.

Employer’s Liability Insurance
Errors and Omissions
Liability:

Limits
$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
$1,000,000 per claim and $2,000,000 in the
aggregate.
99 Item 8 D.

Professional Services Agreement 9/28/2023
Noble Gulch Culvert Condition Assessment
V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Other Insurance Provisions
The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. The City of Capitola, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured’s as respects: liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant.

2. For any claims related to this project, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers.

Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after prior written notice has been given to the City.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.

Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby agrees to waive rights of subrogation which any insurer of Contractor may acquire from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation. The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Capitola for all work performed by the Contractor, its employees, agents and subcontractors.

Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements affecting coverage by this clause. The endorsements should be on forms provided by the City or on other than the City’s forms provided those endorsements conform to City requirements. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications at any time.

SECTION 9
Indemnification
For General Services: To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its directors, officers, employees from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, liabilities, damages, judgments, or expenses (including attorneys’ fees and costs) arising from the acts or omissions of Consultant’s employees or agents in any way related to the obligations or in the performance of services under this Agreement, except for design professional services as defined in Civil Code § 2782.8, and except where caused by the sole or active negligence, or willful misconduct of the City. 100
Item 8 D.

Professional Services Agreement 9/28/2023
Noble Gulch Culvert Condition Assessment
V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc.

For Design Professional Services under Civil Code §2782.8: To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its directors, officers, and employees from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, liabilities, damages, or expenses (including attorneys’ fees and costs) arising from the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, Consultant’s employees, or agents in any way related to the obligations or in the performance of design professional services under this Agreement as defined in Civil Code §2782.8, except where caused by the sole or active negligence, or willful misconduct of the City. The costs to defend charged to the Consultant relating to design professional services shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault per Civil Code §2782.8.and against all claims, damages, losses, and expenses including attorney fees arising out of the performance of the work described herein, caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Consultant, Consultant’s employees, agents or subcontractors, except where caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City.

SECTION 10
Civil Rights Compliance/Equal Opportunity Assurance
Every supplier of materials and services and all consultants doing business with the City of Capitola shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and shall be an equal opportunity employer as defined by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and including the California Fair Employment and Housing Act of 1980. As such, consultant shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, disability, medical condition, marital status, age or sex with respect to hiring, application for employment, tenure or terms and conditions of employment. Consultant agrees to abide by all of the foregoing statutes and regulations.

SECTION 11
Legal Action/Attorneys' Fees
If any action at law or in equity is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees in addition to any other relief to which he or she may be entitled. The laws of the State of California shall govern all matters relating to the validity, interpretation, and effect of this Agreement and any authorized or alleged changes, the performance of any of its terms, as well as the rights and obligations of Consultant and the City.

SECTION 12
Assignment
This Agreement shall not be assigned without first obtaining the express written consent of the Director after approval of the City Council.

SECTION 13
Amendments
This Agreement may not be amended in any respect except by way of a written instrument which expressly references and identifies this particular Agreement, which expressly states that its purpose is to amend this particular Agreement, and which is duly executed by the City and Consultant. Consultant acknowledges that no such amendment shall be effective until approved and authorized by the City Council, or an officer of the City when the City Council may from time to time empower an officer of the City to approve and authorize such amendments. No representative of the City is authorized to obligate the City to pay the cost or value of services beyond the scope of services set forth in Appendix Two. Such 101
Item 8 D.

Professional Services Agreement 9/28/2023
Noble Gulch Culvert Condition Assessment
V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc.

authority is retained solely by the City Council. Unless expressly authorized by the City Council, Consultant's compensation shall be limited to that set forth in Appendix Two.

SECTION 14
Miscellaneous Provisions

1. Project Manager. Director reserves the right to approve the project manager assigned by Consultant to said work. No change in assignment may occur without prior written approval of the City.

2. Consultant Service. Consultant is employed to render professional services only and any payments made to Consultant are compensation solely for such professional services.

3. Licensure. Consultant warrants thereby represents that he or she has an established trade, occupation, or business in the same nature of services Consultant is performing under this Agreement.

Consultant warrants that he or she has complied with any and all applicable governmental licensing requirements.

4. Other Agreements. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter, and no other agreement, statement or promise related to the subject matter of this Agreement which is not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding.

5. City Property. Upon payment for the work performed, or portion thereof, all drawings, specifications, records, or other documents generated by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are, and shall remain, the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for information and reference in connection with the City's use and/or occupancy of the project. The drawings, specifications, records, documents, and Consultant's other work product shall not be used by the Consultant on other projects, except by agreement in writing and with appropriate compensation to the City.

6. Consultant's Records. Consultant shall maintain accurate accounting records and other written documentation pertaining to the costs incurred for this project. Such records and documentation shall be kept available at Consultant's office during the period of this Agreement, and after the term of this Agreement for a period of three years from the date of the final City payment for Consultant's services.

7. Independent Contractor. In the performance of its work, it is expressly understood that Consultant, including Consultant's agents, servants, employees, and subcontractors, is an independent contractor solely responsible for its acts and omissions, and Consultant shall not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. Consultant expressly warrants not to represent, at any time or in any manner, that Consultant is an employee of the City.

8. Conflicts of Interest. Consultant stipulates that corporately or individually, its firm, its employees and subcontractors have no financial interest in either the success or failure of any project which is, or may be, dependent on the results of the Consultant's work product prepared pursuant to this Agreement.

9. Notices. All notices herein provided to be given, or which may be given by either party to the other, shall be deemed to have been fully given and fully received when made in writing and deposited in the United States mail, certified and postage prepaid, and addressed to the respective parties as follows:
102
Item 8 D.

Professional Services Agreement 9/28/2023
Noble Gulch Culvert Condition Assessment
V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc.

CITY OF CAPITOLA
420 Capitola Avenue
Capitola, CA 95010
831-475-7300

V&A CONSULTING ENGINEERS
1000 Broadway, Ste. 320
Oakland, CA 94607
510-903-6600
By:__________________________________
Benjamin Goldstein, City Manager
By:__________________________________

Dated:________________________________ Dated:_______________________________ Approved as to Form:
_______________________________
Samantha W. Zutler, City Attorney
103
Item 8 D.

Professional Services Agreement 9/28/2023
Noble Gulch Culvert Condition Assessment
V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc.

APPENDIX ONE
Scope of Services
104
Item 8 D.
1000 Broadway 510.903.6600 Tel
Suite 320 510.903.6601 Fax
Oakland, CA 94607 vaengineering.com
V&A Project No. 23-0331
September 21, 2023
Jessica Kahn, P.E.

Public Works Director
City of Capitola
420 Capitola Ave
Capitola, CA 95010
Subject: City of Capitola, Noble Gulch Culvert, Proposal for Condition Assessment Services Dear Ms. Kahn,
Thank you for requesting a proposal for the Noble Gulch culvert assessment for the City of Capitola (City). V&A Consulting Engineers (V&A) is prepared to conduct a confined space entry walk-through to reassess the condition of the approximate 500 yard storm water culvert within the Noble Gulch in Capitola, CA. The culvert is comprised of concrete box culvert, reinforced concrete pipe, and corrugated metal pipe. The intent of this re-evaluation is to determine if the condition of the culvert has degraded further since the initial assessments performed in 2011 and 2012. In addition, the City would like to verify that construction at 419 Capitola Avenue did not cause damage to the box culvert section.

During the dry weather season, Soquel Creek backs up into the Noble Gulch due to controlled releases of the creek. It is anticipated that this work will be performed in October to December of 2023, following a rainfall event that permits Soquel Creek to release enough flow to relieve the culvert such that V&A can safely traverse the entire length of pipe within the limits of the project. It is expected that the culvert will not contain more than 6 inches of standing water during the assessment. The City will notify V&A at least one week in advance of a potential Soquel Creek release event.

Per your request, the following is our proposal and detailed scope of work for the subject services:

Scope of Work
Task | Description

1. Project Management: Track and execute the project in accordance with the schedule, budget, and quality expectations that are established. The project duration is assumed to be 4 months. This task includes the following project management work activities:
a. Monitor project progress, including work completed, work remaining, budget expended, schedule, estimated cost of work remaining, and estimated cost at completion; manage activities within the total project budget.
b. Monitor project activities for potential changes and anticipate changes whenever possible; with approval, modify project tasks, task budgets, and approach to keep the overall project within budget and on schedule.
c. Manage the quality of all work activities and project deliverables.

2. Preparation:
a. Document Review: Review the drawings and existing documentation for the culvert to determine the requirements for the field assessment, such as determining the access locations, and staging of safety equipment.
105
Item 8 D.
| Project No. 23-0331 | 2
b. Equipment: Prepare equipment, including personal protective equipment, gas meters, ventilation equipment, tripod assembly, mechanical winch, and fall arrest for the field assessment.
c. Safety Plan: Submit a safety plan prior to the field assessment. The safety plan will document the entry approach, identify possible hazards, and provide rescue procedures for confined space entry. A draft electronic copy of the safety plan will be submitted for review. Comments will be incorporated, and a final electronic copy of the safety plan will be provided.

3. Field Assessment: V&A shall conduct a confined space entry for evaluation of the culvert. V&A will provide a 5-person confined space crew and necessary confined space and testing equipment as required to enter the culvert for the purpose of conducting a condition assessment. V&A will coordinate and conduct the assessment using the following methods:
a. The entrant(s) will document the pipe condition with respect to corrosion during the walk through with digital photographs to be included in the letter report. Particular attention will be made to areas previously noted to be of concern. V&A will note visible corrosion and measure pipe deflections.
b. Ovality measurements of the pipe to determine deflections will be measured at 100-foot intervals.
c. Pipe sounding measurements will be made with a chipping hammer to listen for discontinuities to evaluate the presence of soil voids external to the pipe wall. d. Condition ratings using the VANDA™ Metallic Condition Index. e. The depth of sediment (if present) will be measured at 100-foot intervals. f. Storm drain connections will be documented. Locations of visually identified defective areas will be documented by circumferential clock position in the pipe and their location recorded by distance wheel measurement from entry points.

4. Report: Prepare a report that describes the field assessment methods, activities, results, and conclusions. The report will include photographs of the existing conditions, data tables, and graphical and illustrative figures, as required, to present the information gathered during this assessment. The locations and severity of defects will be noted, and the current condition of the structure regarding its state of degradation will be described. A draft electronic copy of the report will be submitted for review. Comments will be incorporated, and a final electronic copy will be provided.

Any changes to the following assumptions, prevailing wage assumption, exclusions and limitations, or proposed schedule may necessitate an adjustment to the proposed fee.

Assumptions
The following is a list of additional assumptions used to develop V&A’s scope of work. ▪ Suitable access points are available to setup a ladder and davit arm/tripod fall -protection/retrieval system.

Prevailing Wage Assumption
V&A understands some or all tasks associated with this project are subject to prevailing wage rate requirements. All project labor subject to prevailing wage requirements will incur a 25% markup on the associated labor fee. This markup covers the higher base hourly labor rates associated with prevailing wage rates, additional premium pay requirements, and reporting requirements. 106
Item 8 D.
| Project No. 23-0331 | 3
Exclusions and Limitations
The following items, unless otherwise indicated, are not included in the scope of work:
▪ Traffic Control Plans
▪ Traffic Control Measures, including but not limited to sign boards, cones, and flaggers ▪ Encroachment Permits
▪ Notification
▪ Bonds
▪ Shutdown, Dewatering, and Cleaning of Structures
▪ Excavations
▪ Structure Access, including but not limited to ladders, scaffolding, and cranes ▪ Supplied Air
▪ Vendor Portal Registration
▪ Payment Portal Invoice Submission
Fee Proposal
V&A proposes to complete this work on a lump sum basis at a total cost not to exceed $29,950 with terms of net 30 days (contingent payment terms dependent on timely processing of V&A’s submitted invoice). This fee is valid for 90 days from the date of this proposal. The scope of work was developed as a result of our discussions and represents our mutual understanding.

If unforeseen circumstances should arise which indicate that more work is required, V&A will provide a written estimate of additional required work and cost. V&A will not proceed with work beyond the not-to-exceed figure without a written authorization from your office.

We are prepared to begin work on your project upon receiving written approval, a notice to proceed (NTP), or a purchase order from your office.

On behalf of our staff and myself, I would like to thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you and the City of Capitola. We look forward to working with you.

Sincerely,
V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Noy Phannavong, P.E.

Condition Assessment Practice Lead
Accepted: Date:

City of Capitola
107
Item 8 D.
| Project No. 23-0331 | 5
1000 Broadway
Suite 320
Oakland, CA 94607
510.903.6600 Tel
510.903.6601 Fax
vaengineering.com
VANDA Concrete Condition Index
V&A created the VANDA Concrete Condition Index to provide consistent reporting of corrosion damage based on objective criteria. Concrete condition is rated from Level 1 to Level 5 based upon field observations and measurements, with Level 1 indicating the best case and Level 5 indicating severe damage. The individual criteria are applied based on engineering judgment to arrive at the overall rating. The 2020 update to the VANDA Concrete Condition Index adds a fifth rating level, providing greater detail to assist in planning the rehabilitation or replacement of deteriorated assets.

Condition
Rating Description
Representative
Photograph
Level 1 Little or no damage to concrete
Hardness................... hard surface
Surface profile .......... smooth, apparently intact
Cracks ....................... hairline width, minimal frequency Spalling ..................... none
Reinforcement .......... not exposed or damaged
Level 2 Minor surface damage
Hardness................... soft surface layer to 1/8-inch depth Surface profile ..........fine aggregate exposed
Cracks ....................... hairline width, moderate frequency Spalling ..................... shallow spalling, minimal frequency Reinforcement .......... not exposed or damaged
Level 3 Moderate surface damage
Hardness................... soft surface layer to 1/4-inch depth Surface profile .......... large aggregate exposed or protruding Cracks ....................... up to 1/32-inch width, moderate frequency Spalling ..................... shallow spalling, minimal frequency Reinforcement .......... exposed; minor damage, minimal frequency Level 4 Loss of concrete mortar and damage to reinforcement Hardness................... soft paste beyond 1/4-inch depth Surface profile .......... large aggregate exposed, loose, or missing Cracks ....................... 1/8- to 1/4-inch width, moderate frequency Spalling ..................... deep spalling, moderate frequency Reinforcement .......... exposed with damage, moderate frequency Level 5 Bulk loss of concrete and reinforcement
Hardness................... soft paste beyond 1-inch depth Surface profile .......... large aggregate exposed, loose, or missing Cracks ....................... over 1/2-inch width, or narrower and frequent Spalling ..................... deep spalling, high frequency Reinforcement .......... consumed; loss of structural integrity © 2020 V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc. All rights reserved. 108
Item 8 D.
| Project No. 23-0331 | 6
1000 Broadway
Suite 320
Oakland, CA 94607
510.903.6600 Tel
510.903.6601 Fax
vaengineering.com
VANDA Metal Condition Index
V&A created the VANDA Metal Condition Index to provide consistent reporting of corrosion damage based on objective criteria. Metal condition is rated from Level 1 to Level 5 based upon field observations and measurements, with Level 1 indicating the best case and Level 5 indicating severe damage. The individual criteria are applied based on engineering judgment to arrive at the overall rating. The 2020 update to the VANDA Metal Condition Index adds a fifth rating level, providing greater detail to assist in planning the rehabilitation or replacement of deteriorated assets.

Condition
Rating Description
Representative
Photograph
Level 1 Little or no corrosion
▪ Wall thickness loss, general.......none
▪ Wall thickness loss, pitting.........none to minimal
▪ Extent (area) of corrosion...........may be widespread but superficial Level 2 Minor corrosion
▪ Wall thickness loss, general.......up to 20%
▪ Wall thickness loss, pitting.........up to 20%
▪ Extent (area) of corrosion...........localized
Level 3 Moderate corrosion
▪ Wall thickness loss, general.......20% to 40%
▪ Wall thickness loss, pitting.........20% to 60%
▪ Extent (area) of corrosion...........up to half of surface Level 4 Severe corrosion
▪ Wall thickness loss, general.......40% to 60%
▪ Wall thickness loss, pitting.........60% to 100% (pinholes) ▪ Extent (area) of corrosion...........most of surface
Level 5 Failure or imminent failure
▪ Wall thickness loss, general.......greater than 60%
▪ Wall thickness loss, pitting.........100% (holes)
▪ Extent (area) of corrosion...........most or all of surface © 2020 V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc. All rights reserved. 109
Item 8 D.

Professional Services Agreement 9/28/2023
Noble Gulch Culvert Condition Assessment
V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc.

APPENDIX TWO
Fees and Payments
For the services performed, City will pay consultant on a not-to-exceed, lump sum basis upon satisfactory completion of the services and delivery of work products. Payments will be issued monthly as charges accrue.

Consultant hereby represents and warrants, based upon Consultant’s independent determination of the time and labor, which will be required to perform said services, that Consultant will provide all said services at a cost which will not exceed the maximum price set forth in this agreement for Consultant’s services. Consultant hereby assumes the risk that Consultant will perform said services within this maximum price constraint and Consultant acknowledges that its inability to do so shall not excuse completion of the services and shall not provide a basis for additional compensation.

Expenses may include travel, meals and lodging while traveling, materials other than normal office supplies, reproduction and printing costs, equipment rental, computer services, service of subconsultants or subcontractors, and other identifiable job expenses. The use of Consultant’s vehicles for travel shall be paid at the current Internal Revenue Service published mileage rate.

In no event shall the total fee charged for the scope of work set forth in Appendix One exceed the total budget of $29,950 (Twenty Nine Thousand, Nine Hundred and Fifty Dollars and Zero Cents), without specific, written advance authorization from the City.

Payments shall be made monthly by the City, based on itemized invoices from the Consultant which list a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the hours spent and by whom, and a brief description of the actual costs and expenses incurred. Except as specifically authorized by City, Consultant shall not bill City for duplicate services performed by more than one person. Such payments shall be for the invoice amount. The monthly statements shall contain the following affidavit signed by a principal of the Consultant’s firm:
"I hereby certify as principal of the firm of V& Consulting Engineers, Inc., that the charge of $29,950 as summarized above and shown in detail on the attachments is fair and reasonable, is in accordance with the terms of the Agreement dated September 28, 2023, and has not been previously paid." 110
Item 8 D.
111
Item 8 D.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: September 28, 2023
From: City Manager Department
Subject: Universally Accessible Playground at Jade Street Park Naming Recommended Action: Select a playground name for the Universally Accessible Playground at Jade Street Park.

Background: On June 8, 2023, the City Council reviewed the conceptual design for a Universally Accessible Playground at Jade Street Park and approved a partnership with the County Park Friends (Friends) for a fundraising campaign. Also during that meeting, the City Council approved a strategy proposed by the Friends’ that community involvement be sought in determining a name for the UA playground at Jade Street Park. This plan included soliciting name suggestions from the community, with the City Council choosing the playground name from a top three list in the fall.

On July 27, 2023, the City Council approved the final concept for the playground and adopted Administrative Policy V-19, dictating sponsorship opportunities for elements within the playground and overall donor recognition.

Discussion: The Friends received 70 name submissions between June 9 and August 30, and formed a six-member committee comprised of Friends representatives, City staff along with community representatives to review submissions. On September 5th and 12th, the committee met to discuss naming options and unanimously agreed to recommend the following three possible playground names:
 Jewel Box Playground at Jade Street Park
 Lighthouse Landing at Jade Street Park
 Treasure Cove at Jade Street Park
Each name submission was reviewed and considered against the following criteria: Marketability, distinction, and ease of use (would a child use these words, is the name easy to say out loud, etc.); significance to the Capitola community; and alignment to the playground’s marine/shoreline theme.

Fiscal Impact: None.

Report Prepared By: Chloé Woodmansee, Assistant to the City Manager Reviewed By: Julia Moss, City Clerk
Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
112
Item 9 A.

September 28, 2023
113
Item 9 A.

Background
June 8: reviewed conceptual playground design and
approved partnership with Friends of Santa Cruz
County Parks for fundraising
July 27: approved final conceptual playground design
and Admin Policy V-19
114
Item 9 A.
115
Item 9 A.

Playground Naming
Between June 9 and August 30, seventy name submissions
received
6-person committee met to review and choose top three,
using following criteria:
1) marketability/distinction/easy to say
2) significance to Capitola community
3) alignment with playground’s shoreline theme
drum roll, please…
116
Item 9 A.

Top 3 Choices
Jewel Box Playground at Jade Street Park
Lighthouse Landing at Jade Street Park
Treasure Cove at Jade Street Park
117
Item 9 A.

Recommendation
Select a playground name for Universally
Accessible Playground at Jade Street Park
118
Item 9 A.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: September 28, 2023
From: Public Works Department
Subject: Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
Recommended Action: Provide direction to staff regarding short-term and long-term options for improving traffic safety at the intersection of Bay Avenue and Hill Street.

Background: The Bay Avenue/Hill Street intersection is an all-way stop controlled intersection that provides connectivity to Highway 1 and the Capitola Village. The section of Bay Avenue at this location is a four-lane wide roadway with a center left turn lane. The City has received community feedback regarding concerns about pedestrian safety at the crosswalks. During peak hours, the intersection experiences congestion from heavy vehicle and pedestrian cross traffic due to access to the Nob Hill Plaza, the Rispin bridge crossing, and the surrounding residential and commercial land uses. The adopted FY 2023/24 budget includes $50,000 to make improvements to this intersection.

There are currently nine lane approaches at the Bay Avenue/Hill Street intersection (Figure 1). This includes three lanes on Bay Avenue for both northbound and southbound traffic, one lane on Hill Street for westbound traffic, and two lanes from the Nob Hill Driveway for eastbound traffic. Additionally, there is a pedestrian crosswalk with a raised median and contrasting pavement, as well as Class II bike lanes on Bay Avenue.

The primary concern at this intersection is the high number of lanes, combined with the presence of pedestrian crossings and bike lanes, can make it challenging for drivers to effectively navigate the stopcontrolled intersection.

Figure 1. Existing Bay/Hill Intersection Layout
119
Item 9 B.

There were a total of 16 accidents at the Bay Avenue/Hill Street intersection between November 2017 and August 2023. The most common collision occurred from broadside crashes between two vehicles making improper turns at the intersection (six). All but one of the reported collisions involved two vehicles, and the collision severity ranged from property damage to injuries. Two pedestrian-involved collisions occurred in December of 2022 and August 2023, due to vehicles failing to yield for a pedestrian in the crosswalk. The Police Department issues an average of 22 citations per year in/near this intersection.

The City Council allocated $50,000 to the “Bay Avenue/Hill Street Pilot Project” in the Fiscal Year 2023- 24 Budget. Following City Council direction, this report is being presented to identify areas in this intersection where traffic, pedestrian, and bicycle concerns have been identified and to provide potential short- and long-term options to address these concerns for the City Council’s consideration.

Discussion: The City contracted with Kimley Horn to perform an evaluation of the traffic operations and feasible intersection improvements at Bay Avenue/Hill Street that could improve traffic operations and safety for vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians (Attachment 1). This analysis considered level of service (LOS), vehicle queue lengths, and bike and pedestrian access. LOS is a measure of how well the intersection functions from a traffic flow perspective during typical peak traffic periods.

The Bay Avenue/Hill Street intersection currently operates at LOS C during the AM, Midday, and PM peaks with the existing all-way stop baseline geometry. Pursuant to the City’s General Plan, LOS C is identified as the minimum LOS operational standard generally and LOS D as the minimum acceptable standard at signalized and unsignalized intersections within the Village Area, along Bay Avenue, and along 41st Avenue.
“Queue length” is the space needed for cars to stack while waiting to complete a turn. This length should be long enough to accommodate all turning vehicles so that traffic doesn't back up into through-traffic lanes.

Bike and pedestrian access is generally improved in intersections with increased visibility, separated spaces, and when crossing distances are minimized.

Four alternatives were evaluated for the Bay Avenue / Hill Street intersection, and are summarized in Table 1:

1. Convert the intersection into signal control: This alternative involves installing traffic signals at the intersection to regulate the flow of vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists. Signal control can help improve traffic operations and enhance safety by providing clear right-of-way instructions to all users.

2. Convert the intersection into a single lane roundabout layout with yield control: This alternative includes replacing the existing intersection with a roundabout, which would feature a circular roadway with yield control at entry points. Roundabouts are known for their traffic calming effects, improved safety, and efficient traffic flow.

3. Convert Bay Avenue into a 2-lane roadway with a road diet transition: This alternative proposes reducing the number of lanes on Bay Avenue to create a 2-lane roadway. This road diet transition aims to improve traffic operations and safety by reallocating space for other uses, such as bike lanes, wider sidewalks, or landscaped areas.

4. Maintain the existing all-way stop control: This alternative keeps the current configuration of the intersection with the all-way stop control.
120
Item 9 B.

Table 1. Intersection Improvement Alternatives
Signal Roundabout Road Diet Comments
LOS ⚫ ⚫ ⚫
Roundabout (LOS A) and signal (LOS B) have less
delay than AWSC (LOS B/C) or the Road Diet worst
movement (LOS F).

Queueing ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ Each option will experience queuing during peak hours.

Collision Severity ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ Collision severity is typically reduced by the lowspeed, low-angle of collision of a roundabout.

Collision Frequency ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ Single-lane roundabouts typically decrease collisions. Signals typically increase collisions.

Pedestrian Mobility ⚫ ⚫ ⚫
The roundabout provides more pedestrian islands,
and allows pedestrians to cross one lane of traffic at
a time.

Pedestrian Safety ⚫ ⚫ ⚫
The roundabout lowers speeds and number of
conflicts. Road diet has narrower crossings and
slower speeds.

ROW Acquisition ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ More land maybe required with the roundabout option.

Network
Connectivity ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ All maintain good network connectivity.

Construction $ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫
Higher roadway area and landscaping costs with a
roundabout; higher costs with signal due to electrical
improvements. Signal and roundabout costs
estimated at $450,000; Road diet permanent
improvements estimated at approximately $200,000
Maintenance $ ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ Potential for landscaping maintenance at roundabout and at road diet approach islands
Aesthetics ⚫ ⚫ ⚫
Roundabout has opportunities for landscaping
center island features. Road diet allows approach
islands.

Emergency
Response ⚫ ⚫ ⚫ All options provide good mobility foremergency response vehicles.

GHG emissions ⚫ ⚫ ⚫
Installing roundabouts in place of traffic signals or
stop signs has been found to significantly reduce
CO2 and other air pollution emissions.

Better Worse
⚫ ⚫ ⚫
From an intersection operations perspective, Alternative 2 (roundabout) would offer the best LOS and vehicle queuing results. This alternative would accommodate improved multi-modal access for bikes, pedestrians, and vehicles. However, it should be noted that substantial intersection and construction improvements would be necessary to convert the intersection into a roundabout, making it a more 121
Item 9 B.
complex and time-consuming project. However, a roundabout at this location would not require utility relocation, which is often the most time-consuming aspect of these projects.

Alternative 1, the signal configuration, would also provide acceptable LOS and vehicle queuing operations while offering improved multi-modal access for bikes and pedestrians. It is worth noting that while the LOS would be “improved” with a signal-controlled intersection, the typical delay for a vehicle to traverse the intersection would actually increase as compared to the other options.

Alternative 3, the road diet configuration, would result in the worst LOS operation, based on traditional traffic modeling, but would provide improved bike and pedestrian access through a 2-lane road diet and raised pedestrian crossing features. It is worth noting that City staff, have speculated that a traditional traffic model may overestimate the actual effect of implementing a road diet through this intersection as the sheer number of conflicting movements in the current intersection appear to create notable driver confusion, which can lead to lower levels of service.

Considering the community's primary concern for safety and the desire for near-term action, Staff recommends moving forward with a "quick build" project based on Alternative 3. Quick-build projects are reversible and adjustable traffic safety improvements that can be installed relatively quickly. They typically utilize cost-efficient and readily available materials such as paint, cones, barriers, and signage. These projects can create safer lanes for pedestrians, cyclists, and other road users. Unlike major capital projects, quick-build projects can be implemented within weeks or months and are intended to be evaluated and reviewed within the initial 24 months of construction.

Figure 2. Examples of a “Quick-Build” Intersection Project Upon direction from the City Council, staff proposes conducting public outreach on the proposed intersection modifications in early 2024. This outreach would provide an opportunity for the community to provide input, ask questions, and express any concerns regarding the project. To minimize disruption, staff recommends scheduling the construction for late spring, avoiding the school year.

Fiscal Impact: Estimated cost to complete Alternative 3 is within the allocated $50,000 budget in the FY 2023-24 budget. This quick build project would be temporary in nature, and there would be a budget 122
Item 9 B.
allocation in the FY 2024-25 budget to analyze its effectiveness and either remove or permanentize the improvements.

If the City Council directs staff to pursue Alternative 1 (signalization), the installation of signals would cost around $450,000. There would be additional costs for bike and pedestrian accommodations. Operating a signal typically costs around $5,000 annually.

If the City Council directs staff to pursue Alternative 2 (roundabout), the estimated cost would be similar to the traffic signal. This is because significant modifications to the intersection geometry would be required, along with extensive public outreach and additional traffic studies. However, there are significant sources of external funding available for roundabouts due to their GHG reductions, which staff could pursue should Council direct staff to proceed with this alternative.

Attachments:

1. Bay Avenue / Hill Street – Intersection Operations Analysis

2. Concept Layout - Alterative 2 Roundabout

3. Concept Layout - Alterative 3 Road Diet
Report Prepared By: Jessica Kahn, Public Works Director Reviewed By: Julia Moss, City Clerk
Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
123
Item 9 B.

Bay / Hill – Intersection Operations Analysis
1 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
To: Kailash Mozumder and Jessica Kahn, City of Capitola From: Derek Wu P.E. and Frederik Venter P.E., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Date: September 22, 2023
Re: Bay Avenue / Hill Street – Intersection Operations Analysis

1. Introduction
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) is working with the City of Capitola (City) to evaluate the traffic operations at the intersection of Bay Avenue and Hill Street. The Bay Avenue / Hill Street intersection is an existing all-way stop controlled intersection that provides connectivity to Highway 1 and the Capitola Village. The section of Bay Avenue at this location is a four-lane wide roadway with a center left turn lane, and there have been community concerns of limited pedestrian visibility and safety at the crosswalks. During the peak hour, the intersection experiences congestion from heavy vehicle and pedestrian cross traffic due to access to the Nob Hill Plaza, the Rispin bridge crossing, and the surrounding residential and commercial land uses.

The City is investigating feasible intersection improvements at Bay Avenue / Hill Street that could improve traffic operations and safety for vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians. These potential intersection improvements may include physical changes to the roadway geometry, signalization, and/or signing/striping. Figure 1 presents an overview map of the project study intersections along the Bay Avenue corridor
Figure 1 – Overview Map
124
Item 9 B.

Bay / Hill – Intersection Operations Analysis
2 2. Data Collection and Intersection Conditions:

This section describes the various analysis scenarios and traffic data used to analyze the study intersection.

Year 2022 (Existing) Study Scenario
Year 2022 existing turning movement counts during the 7-9 AM peak, 2-4 PM Midday peak, and 4-6 PM peak hours at the project study intersections were collected by All Traffic Data Service. These traffic counts were collected on 2/15/2022 and 9/13/2022 when school was in session and during favorable weather conditions. The collected traffic volume data is provided in Table 1 and Attachment A.

Table 1: Bay/Hill Intersection Traffic Volumes
Existing Intersection Layout
The Bay Avenue / Hill Street all-way stop controlled intersection currently operates with the following lane geometry as shown in Figure 2:
• Bay Avenue Major Approach (Northbound and Southbound directions) o 1 left turn lane, 1 through lane, 1 shared through-right lane o Class II bike lane striped along the curb
o Santa Cruz Metro bus stop in southwest corner
o Pedestrian crosswalk with raised median and contrasting pavement • Hill Street Minor Approach (Westbound direction)
o 1 shared left-through-right lane
• Nob Hill Driveway Minor Approach (Eastbound direction) o 1 shared left-through lane, 1 right turn lane
o 2 receiving vehicle lanes into commercial plaza driveway

NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR TOTAL
AM 8:00-9:00 59 392 12 86 329 29 51 17 30 7 38 134 1184 Mid 14:30-15:30 60 402 23 124 458 53 75 45 68 15 25 104 1452 PM 16:00-17:00 89 290 14 154 438 52 89 44 79 23 45 86 1403 Bay Avenue Hill Street
Vehicle Traffic Volume by Direction and Movement
Peak Hour
NB Leg SB Leg EB Leg WB Leg TOTAL
AM 8:00-9:00 7 3 14 7 31
Mid 14:30-15:30 24 8 9 10 51
PM 16:00-17:00 17 14 8 10 49
Peak Hour
Bike & Pedestrian Crossing Traffic Volume by Direction
Bay Avenue Hill Street
125
Item 9 B.

Bay / Hill – Intersection Operations Analysis
3 Figure 2 – Existing Bay/Hill Intersection Layout
SWITRS Collision Data
Collision data from 2017 to 2022 along Bay Avenue was also obtained using the State Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database. SWITRS is a tool which California Highway Patrol (CHP) staff and members of its Allied Agencies throughout California can request various types of statistical collision reports in an electronic format. Table 2 and Attachment A summarizes the reported traffic collisions at the Bay/Hill intersection.

Table 2: Bay/Hill Collision Data (2017 to 2022)
Between November 2017 and November 2022, there were 13 reported collisions at the Bay Avenue / Hill Street intersection. The most common collision was 6 broadside crashes between two vehicles making improper turns at the intersection. All the reported collisions involved two vehicle parties and the collision severity ranged from property damage only to injuries.

Capitola Police Department Collision Data
The City of Capitola provided supplemental collision data for pedestrian and bicycle collisions from the Capitola Police Department (PD) in addition to the SWITRS data. Between 2017 and 2023, there were 3 Date Range
November
2017 to 2022
Head-On 1 Other PDO
Sideswipe 4 Improper Turn, Auto R/W PDO
Rear End 1 Unsafe Speed PDO
Broadside 6 Improper Turn, Auto R/W, Unsafe Speed Injury, PDO Hit Object 1 Improper Turn PDO
Overturned 0
Auto/Ped 0
Other 0
Total # Collisions 13
Primary Collision Factors Collision Severity
Vehicle Collision Type
126
Item 9 B.

Bay / Hill – Intersection Operations Analysis
4 collisions between vehicles and pedestrians and 0 collisions between vehicles and bicycles at the Bay/Hill intersection. See Attachment A for the detailed data.

3. Traffic Operations and Intersection Level of Service Analysis Methodology
The Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Sixth Edition, Synchro 11, and Sidra 9 traffic analysis software were used to perform an operational analysis of the study intersection.

The results of the HCM operational analysis are commonly described using a grading system called level of service, or LOS. LOS is a description of intersection operating conditions, ranging from LOS A (free flow traffic conditions with little or no delay) to LOS F (oversaturated conditions where traffic flows exceed design capacity, resulting in long queues and delays).

Per the City of Capitola General Plan, LOS C is identified as the minimum level of service operational standard The City also accepts LOS D as the minimum acceptable standard at signalized and unsignalized intersections within the Village Area, along Bay Avenue, and along 41st Avenue. Therefore, LOS D was the threshold applied to the Bay/Hill intersection.

Proposed Bay/Hill Intersection Alternatives
The intersection operations analysis investigated potential improvements that could improve access and safety for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. The following lane intersection improvement and lane configuration alternatives were evaluated under the Year 2022 study scenario:
• Alternative 1 - Signal
o Convert intersection into signal control
o Lane geometry as described in Section 2 for all intersection leg approaches ▪ Permissive yield left turn operations for Eastbound and Westbound approaches ▪ Protected left turn operations for Northbound and Southbound approaches o Assumes signal equipment can fit within existing City intersection footprint and right-ofway, no physical improvements needed • Alternative 2 - Roundabout
o Convert intersection into single lane roundabout layout with yield control ▪ 84-ft inscribed circle diameter intersection
▪ 44-ft diameter center island with raised apron for heavy vehicle turns ▪ Raised splitter islands at each approach leg for 2-stage pedestrian crossing ▪ 10-ft wide Class I shared bike/ped pathway
o Assumes roundabout improvements can fit within existing City intersection footprint and right-of-way
o Bay Avenue Major Approach (Northbound and Southbound directions) ▪ 1 shared left-through-right lane
▪ Lane drop transition prior to roundabout intersection ▪ Bike lane transitions and curb ramps onto Class I shared bike/ped pathway prior to roundabout intersection
▪ Santa Cruz Metro bus stop and commercial driveway access is maintained along Bay Avenue corridor
o Hill Street Minor Approach (Westbound direction)
127
Item 9 B.

Bay / Hill – Intersection Operations Analysis
5 ▪ 1 shared left-through-right lane
▪ Pedestrian crossing relocated before roundabout intersection o Nob Hill Driveway Minor Approach (Eastbound direction) ▪ 1 shared left-through-right lane
▪ Pedestrian crossing and pathway relocated inside plaza parking lot before roundabout intersection
• Alternative 3 –All Way Stop Control with Road Diet
o Convert Bay Avenue into a 2-lane roadway with road diet transition and striping between Crossroads Loop and Center Street
o Install curb bulb-outs and raised intersection crossings at the Bay/Hill intersection o Assumes improvements can fit within existing City intersection footprint and right-ofway o Bay Avenue Major Approach (Northbound and Southbound directions) ▪ 1 left turn lane, 1 shared through-right lane
▪ Lane drop transition prior to all-way stop intersection ▪ Raised speed table and pedestrian crosswalk at stop bar o Hill Street Minor Approach (Westbound direction)
▪ 1 shared left-through-right lane
o Nob Hill Driveway Minor Approach (Eastbound direction) ▪ 1 shared left-through lane, 1 right turn lane
• Alternative 4 – Existing Baseline All Way Stop Control o Lane geometry as described in Section 2
o Control scenario for traffic operation comparison with proposed alternatives Figures detailing the general operations and dimensions of the Alternative 1, 2, and 3 concept design layouts are included in Attachment B.

Year 2022 Existing Conditions LOS
Table 3 provides an intersection LOS comparison between the signal, roundabout, and all way stop control configurations for the AM, Midday, and PM peak hour under Year 2022 existing conditions. The LOS calculations with Synchro and Sidra software are included in Attachment C. 128
Item 9 B.

Bay / Hill – Intersection Operations Analysis
6 Table 3: Bay/Hill Intersection LOS Summary
As shown above, the Bay/Hill intersection currently operates at acceptable LOS C during the AM, Midday, and PM peak with the Alternative 4 all-way stop baseline geometry. With the Alternative 1 signal layout, the intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS B during the AM, Midday, and PM peak.

The Alternative 2 roundabout layout would operate at LOS A during the AM, Midday, and PM peak. With the Alternative 3 all-way stop road diet layout, the intersection would operate at LOS C during the AM peak, LOS F during the Midday peak, and LOS D during the PM peak.

Compared to the baseline all-way stop configuration, the Alternative 1 signal and Alternative 2 roundabout options would operate with better LOS and reduced overall intersection delay for all the

EB WB NB SB
Delay (s) 11.2 10.4 12 11.3 11

LOS B B B B B
Delay (s) 7.6 5.7 7.9 8.2 7.3

LOS A A A A A
Delay (s) 24.8 12.4 15.4 31.9 23.8

LOS C B C D C
Delay (s) 16.1 13.1 16 17.4 15.4

LOS C B C C C

EB WB NB SB
Delay (s) 12.2 10.9 11.5 12.4 12.5

LOS B B B B B
Delay (s) 9.5 9 7.3 9.9 9.9

LOS A A A A A
Delay (s) 55.3 14.6 16.3 47.9 87.9

LOS F B C E F
Delay (s) 21.8 16.2 17.6 22.3 24.1

LOS C C C C C

EB WB NB SB
Delay (s) 12.1 11 11.4 12 12.6

LOS B B B B B
Delay (s) 8.6 8.5 6.1 7.8 9.8

LOS A A A A A
Delay (s) 26.8 13.5 14.8 18.5 39.1

LOS D B B C E
Delay (s) 16.3 14.6 15.7 15 17.7

LOS C B C B C
3 AWSC Road Diet Stop 1-lane approach geometry
4 Baseline AWSC Stop Existing lane geometry
Overall
Intersection
Hill Street Bay Avenue Notes
1 Signal Signal Existing lane geometry
2 Roundabout Yield 1-lane approach geometry
Midday Peak Hour Intersection Operations
Alternative Control
Type
HCM 6th Ed
Criteria
Overall
Intersection
Hill Street Bay Avenue Notes
1 Signal Signal Existing lane geometry
2 Roundabout Yield 1-lane approach geometry
3 AWSC Road Diet Stop 1-lane approach geometry
Existing lane
geometry
PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations
4 Baseline AWSC Stop
Alternative Control
Type
HCM 6th Ed
Criteria
AM Peak Hour Intersection Operations
Overall Hill Street
Intersection
Notes Control
Type
Bay Avenue
Signal 1
Signal
Alternative HCM 6th Ed
Criteria
Existing lane
geometry
1-lane approach
geometry
3 AWSC Road Diet Stop 1-lane approach
geometry
2 Roundabout Yield
4 Baseline AWSC Stop Existing lane geometry
129
Item 9 B.

Bay / Hill – Intersection Operations Analysis
7 peak periods. Of these options, the roundabout would yield the best LOS results with the shortest overall intersection delay at 7.6 seconds, 9.5 seconds, and 8.6 seconds for the respective AM, Midday, and PM peaks.

The Alternative 3 all-way stop road diet option would operate with worse LOS and would exceed the City’s acceptable LOS D threshold for traffic operations during the Midday peak. This increase in intersection delay is because the Bay Avenue northbound and southbound approaches are the critical intersection movements, and the reduction of travel lanes with the 2-lane road diet plus stop control increases overall vehicle delay along Bay Avenue.

4. Intersection Queuing Analysis
A queuing analysis was also performed along the Bay Avenue roadway corridor to determine the queuing effect for each of the alternative layouts. The SimTraffic software associated with Synchro 11 was used to simulate the signal, roundabout, and all way stop control lane configurations at the Bay/Hill intersection during the peak hour period. This micro-simulation was conducted to obtain the 95th percentile vehicle queue on each approach during the AM, Midday, and PM peak hour period. The results of the 95th percentile queues observed in the analysis for the Year 2022 Existing conditions are summarized in Table 4. Vehicle queuing calculations are included in Attachment D.

Table 4: Bay/Hill Intersection Queuing Analysis Summary Note: Approach storage length based on existing turn pocket length or distance from next intersection

EB WB NBL NBT SBL SBT
Average 95% Queue 78 84 61 72 74 175
Approach Storage Length 95 348 100 340 100 160
Storage Delta 17 264 39 268 26 -15
Sufficient Storage? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Average 95% Queue 49 65 79 79 82 82
Approach Storage Length 95 348 340 340 160 160
Storage Delta 46 283 261 261 78 78
Sufficient Storage? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Average 95% Queue 54 63 59 116 77 131
Approach Storage Length 95 348 100 340 100 160
Storage Delta 41 285 41 224 23 29
Sufficient Storage? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Average 95% Queue 54 74 43 62 81 108
Approach Storage Length 95 348 100 340 100 160
Storage Delta 41 274 57 278 19 52
Sufficient Storage? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
4 Baseline
AWSC
Stop
Yield
Stop
1 Signal
2 Roundabout
3 AWSC Road
Diet
Signal
Control
Type
Alternative Criteria
Approach Queue (ft)
Hill Street Bay Avenue
AM Peak Hour Vehicle Queues
130
Item 9 B.

Bay / Hill – Intersection Operations Analysis
8 Note: Approach storage length based on existing turn pocket length or distance from next intersection Note: Approach storage length based on existing turn pocket length or distance from next intersection

EB WB NBL NBT SBL SBT
Average 95% Queue 98 76 71 100 97 250
Approach Storage Length 95 348 100 340 100 160
Storage Delta -3 272 29 240 3 -90
Sufficient Storage? No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Average 95% Queue 87 57 97 97 150 150
Approach Storage Length 95 348 340 340 160 160
Storage Delta 8 291 243 243 10 10
Sufficient Storage? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Average 95% Queue 78 78 71 157 100 238
Approach Storage Length 95 348 100 340 100 160
Storage Delta 17 270 29 183 0 -78
Sufficient Storage? Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
Average 95% Queue 76 61 44 83 98 191
Approach Storage Length 95 348 100 340 100 160
Storage Delta 19 287 56 257 2 -31
Sufficient Storage? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Stop
Midday Peak Hour Vehicle Queues
Alternative Control
Type
Criteria
Approach Queue (ft)
Hill Street Bay Avenue
1 Signal Signal
2 Roundabout Yield
3 AWSC Road
Diet
Stop
4 Baseline
AWSC

EB WB NBL NBT SBL SBT
Average 95% Queue 90 89 73 84 92 204
Approach Storage Length 95 348 100 340 100 160
Storage Delta 5 259 27 256 8 -44
Sufficient Storage? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Average 95% Queue 67 56 82 82 206 206
Approach Storage Length 95 348 340 340 160 160
Storage Delta 28 292 258 258 -46 -46
Sufficient Storage? Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
Average 95% Queue 74 74 55 74 95 267
Approach Storage Length 95 348 100 340 100 160
Storage Delta 21 274 45 266 5 -107
Sufficient Storage? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Average 95% Queue 74 72 47 67 98 237
Approach Storage Length 95 348 100 340 100 160
Storage Delta 21 276 53 273 2 -77
Sufficient Storage? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
PM Peak Hour Vehicle Queues
Alternative Control
Type
Criteria
Approach Queue (ft)
Hill Street Bay Avenue
1 Signal Signal
2 Roundabout Yield
3 AWSC Road
Diet
Stop
4 Baseline
AWSC
Stop
131
Item 9 B.

Bay / Hill – Intersection Operations Analysis
9 For Alternative 1 - Signal, the average 95th percentile queues are anticipated to exceed the existing available storage length between adjacent intersections for the following approaches:
• Southbound Through – AM, Midday, and PM peak
• Eastbound – Midday peak
For Alternative 2 - Roundabout, the average 95th percentile queues are anticipated to exceed the existing available storage length between adjacent intersections for the following approaches:
• Southbound Left –PM peak
• Southbound Through – PM peak
For Alternative 3 – Road Diet, the average 95th percentile queues are anticipated to exceed the existing available storage length between adjacent intersections for the following approaches:
• Southbound Left –Midday peak
• Southbound Through – Midday and PM peak
For the Baseline AWSC Geometry, the average 95th percentile queues are anticipated to exceed the existing available storage length between adjacent intersections for the following approaches:
• Southbound Through – Midday and PM peak
Overall, for the Year 2022 scenario, Alternative 2 would provide the most optimal intersection configuration to accommodate the anticipated peak hour vehicle queues.

It should be noted that for all intersection options, the existing storage length for the Bay Avenue southbound approach is approximately 160-feet long between Hill Street and Crossroads Loop and does not accommodate the anticipated peak hour vehicle queues. The Crossroads Loop / Bay Avenue intersection is stop controlled on the minor approaches and the 95th percentile peak hour queues on Bay Avenue are anticipated to encroach into the intersection. To prevent vehicle queues from blocking access at the Crossroads Loop, the intersection area should be augmented with “Keep Clear” striping on Bay Avenue.

5. Bike and Pedestrian Access Comparison
Table 5 compares the bicycle and pedestrian access features between the proposed intersection alternatives. Overall, the Alternative 2 roundabout geometry would provide the shortest pedestrian crossings and enhance bicycle access through the intersection compared to the other configurations.

The Alternative 3 road diet geometry would also enhance bike and pedestrian access due to the shorter crossing distances and raised crosswalks in the northbound and southbound legs. 132
Item 9 B.

Bay / Hill – Intersection Operations Analysis
10 Table 5: Bay/Hill Intersection Bike and Pedestrian Summary

6. Conclusions and Recommendations
From an intersection operations perspective, the Alternative 2 roundabout configuration would yield the best LOS and vehicle queuing results to accommodate improved multi-modal access for bikes, pedestrians, and vehicles. For Alternative 2 to be feasible, substantial intersection and construction improvements would be required to convert the intersection into a roundabout.

The Alternative 1 signal configuration would also yield acceptable LOS and vehicle queuing operations, and the signal would be a feasible alternative to provide improved multi-modal access for bikes and pedestrians. The Alternative 3 road diet configuration would yield the worst LOS and queueing operations, but the 2-lane road diet and raised pedestrian crossing features would provide improved bike and pedestrian access.

7. Appendix
• Attachment A – Traffic Count Data and SWITRS/Capitola PD Collision Data • Attachment B – Intersection Alternative Concept Layouts • Attachment C – Synchro and Sidra LOS Results
• Attachment D – Synchro Queuing Results

EB WB NB SB
1 Signal Signal Striped Class II bike lane
Red contrasting pavement;
Median refuge on NB & SB legs;
6' Sidewalk
Ped signal crossing phase
42 38 64 64
2 Roundabout Yield
Striped Class II
bike lane; Bike
ramp transitions
between Class I
shared pathway
Red contrasting pavement;
Median refuge on NB, SB, EB, WB legs;
10' Class I shared pathway;
Separated crossings from intersection
36 28 30 30
3 AWSC Road
Diet
Stop
Striped Class II
bike lane with 2'
buffers
Red contrasting pavement;
Curb extensions on NB & SB legs;
6' Sidewalk
Raised speed table and crossings on NB
& SB legs
42 30 48 48
4 Baseline
AWSC
Stop
Striped Class II
bike lane
Red contrasting pavement;
Raised median refuge on NB & SB legs'
6' Sidewalk
42 38 64 64
Crosswalk Exposure In
Roadway (ft)
Hill Street Bay Avenue
Alternative Pedestrian Features Control
Type
Bike Features
133
Item 9 B.

Bay / Hill – Intersection Operations Analysis
Attachment A –Traffic Count Data and SWITRS/Capitola PD Collision Data 134
Item 9 B.

Highway 1 NB Ramps Highway 1 NB Ramps Bay Avenue Bay Avenue (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 1 Bay Avenue & Highway 1 NB Ramps AM
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022
Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Motorized Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Study Peak Hour (for all study intersections)
Study Peak Hour: 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
Peak 15-Minutes in Study Peak Hour: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM Traffic Counts - Heavy Vehicles, Bicycles on Road, and Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk 881 677
207
0 472 925
0 864

0.95 N
S
EW

0.81 0.86

0.91 0.00
(1,451) (1,056)
(412)
()
(1,466)
()
(789) (1,448) 4740
0 139
3 65
0 0
0 0
0 407
0387 5380 Highway 1 NB Ramps
Highway 1 NB Ramps
Bay Avenue
Bay Avenue
0 5
0 15
N
S
W E 1 4
0 0
0 0 13 2
400
2 0
3 0
0 0
13 18
5 0
2112
0 9 N
S
W E
0 0 9
05160
Interval
Start Time Left Thru Right Total
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn
Rolling
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Hour 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 20 1 32 0 57 19 0 0 0 44 49 222 1,360 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 18 1 34 0 64 41 0 0 0 46 66 270 1,630 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 40 0 75 88 0 0 0 72 96 391 1,890 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 13 2 30 0 108 127 0 0 0 91 106 477 2,013 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 38 0 79 174 0 0 0 81 102 492 1,951 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 12 1 33 0 96 115 0 0 0 133 140 530
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 38 0 104 122 0 0 0 102 126 514
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 18 2 19 0 73 106 0 0 0 79 118 415
Count Total 0 0 0 0 0 141 7 264 0 656 792 0 0 0 648 3,311 803 Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 65 3 139 0 387 538 0 0 0 407 2,013 474 HV% PHF

0.00 0.86

0.91 0.81

0.0%

2.4%

2.3%

1.5%

1.9% 0.95
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Interval Heavy Vehicles
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 0 3 1 0 4
7:15 AM 0 1 1 4 6
7:30 AM 0 2 2 0 4
7:45 AM 0 7 1 6 14
8:00 AM 0 1 2 2 5
8:15 AM 0 5 2 3 10
8:30 AM 0 8 0 2 10
8:45 AM 0 4 1 3 8
Count Total 0 31 10 20 61
Peak Hour 0 21 5 13 39
Interval Bicycles on Roadway
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 1
8:00 AM 0 2 0 10 12
8:15 AM 0 3 0 2 5
8:30 AM 0 1 0 3 4
8:45 AM 0 1 0 1 2
Count Total 0 8 0 16 24
Peak Hour 0 7 0 15 22
Interval Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 0 0 4 0 4
7:15 AM 1 0 1 0 2
7:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1
7:45 AM 1 0 1 0 2
8:00 AM 3 0 3 0 6
8:15 AM 8 0 1 0 9
8:30 AM 3 0 0 0 3
8:45 AM 2 0 3 0 5
Count Total 19 0 13 0 32
Peak Hour 15 0 5 0 20
135
Item 9 B.

Highway 1 SB Ramps Highway 1 SB Ramps Bay Avenue Bay Avenue (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 2 Bay Avenue & Highway 1 SB Ramps AM
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022
Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Motorized Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Study Peak Hour (for all study intersections)
Study Peak Hour: 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
Peak 15-Minutes in Study Peak Hour: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM Traffic Counts - Heavy Vehicles, Bicycles on Road, and Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk 491 918
0 310
562 723
576
0 0.95
N
S
EW

0.81 0.00

0.95 0.94
(810) (1,448)
()
(546)
()
(926)
(923) (1,181)
00 188
0 0
0 259
0 317
0 0 303
00601 122
Highway 1 SB Ramps
Highway 1 SB Ramps
Bay Avenue
Bay Avenue
0 2
0 16
N
S
W E 2 0
0 0
0 0 8 8
040
0 0
0 7
0 16
13 23
0 8
1116
23 0 N
S
W E
0 0 9
0074
Interval
Start Time Left Thru Right Total
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn
Rolling
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Hour 7:00 AM 0 13 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 17 0 23 40 0 193 1,186 7:15 AM 0 27 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 25 0 29 34 0 226 1,442 7:30 AM 0 53 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 27 0 42 51 0 339 1,687 7:45 AM 0 84 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 30 0 58 47 0 428 1,790 8:00 AM 0 92 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 27 0 34 71 0 449 1,731 8:15 AM 0 69 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 34 0 47 105 0 471
8:30 AM 0 72 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 31 0 49 80 0 442
8:45 AM 0 73 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 26 1 47 52 0 369
Count Total 0 483 0 443 0 0 0 0 0 0 964 217 1 329 480 2,917 0 Peak Hour 0 317 0 259 0 0 0 0 0 0 601 122 0 188 303 1,790 0 HV% PHF

0.94 0.00

0.95 0.81

4.0%

0.0%

1.5%

2.6%

2.6% 0.95
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Interval Heavy Vehicles
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 5 0 0 1 6
7:15 AM 1 0 0 3 4
7:30 AM 2 1 0 0 3
7:45 AM 8 3 0 3 14
8:00 AM 2 2 0 2 6
8:15 AM 5 3 0 6 14
8:30 AM 8 3 0 2 13
8:45 AM 4 4 0 4 12
Count Total 35 16 0 21 72
Peak Hour 23 11 0 13 47
Interval Bicycles on Roadway
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 1
8:00 AM 0 2 0 7 9
8:15 AM 0 2 0 3 5
8:30 AM 0 0 0 2 2
8:45 AM 0 1 0 1 2
Count Total 0 6 0 13 19
Peak Hour 0 5 0 12 17
Interval Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1
7:30 AM 3 0 0 0 3
7:45 AM 4 0 0 0 4
8:00 AM 5 0 1 0 6
8:15 AM 5 0 0 0 5
8:30 AM 2 0 1 0 3
8:45 AM 3 0 2 0 5
Count Total 23 0 4 0 27
Peak Hour 16 0 2 0 18
136
Item 9 B.

Hill Street Hill Street Bay Avenue Bay Avenue
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 3 Bay Avenue & Hill Street AM
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022
Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Motorized Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Study Peak Hour (for all study intersections)
Study Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes in Study Peak Hour: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM Traffic Counts - Heavy Vehicles, Bicycles on Road, and Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk 435 571
171
104
365 462
98 126

0.88 N
S
EW

0.74 0.93

0.86 0.88
(653) (992)
(306)
(145)
(191)
(163)
(559) (765) 29176
127
38 6
30 17
51 0
0 329
059392 11 Hill Street Hill Street Bay Avenue
Bay Avenue
3 7
7 14
N
S
W E 3 4
4 3
2 1 9 5
100
1 1
0 0
0 3
10 9
2 1
79 3
3 N
S
W E
0 0 9
0151
Interval
Start Time Left Thru Right Total
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn
Rolling
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Hour 7:00 AM 0 13 4 5 0 1 6 20 0 8 40 0 0 5 22 5 129 721
7:15 AM 0 7 3 3 0 1 2 21 0 3 42 1 0 9 35 5 132 882
7:30 AM 0 7 1 6 0 0 3 40 0 10 92 1 0 2 58 4 224 1,081
7:45 AM 0 7 3 6 0 2 4 35 0 8 97 1 0 11 55 7 236 1,156
8:00 AM 0 10 3 6 0 1 10 35 0 12 110 1 1 19 79 3 290 1,166 8:15 AM 0 17 4 7 0 1 8 37 0 14 95 2 0 22 119 5 331
8:30 AM 0 13 4 7 0 0 12 25 0 12 118 4 0 20 75 9 299
8:45 AM 0 11 6 10 0 4 8 30 0 21 69 4 0 15 56 12 246
Count Total 0 85 28 50 0 10 53 243 0 88 663 14 1 103 499 1,887 50 Peak Hour 0 51 17 30 0 6 38 127 0 59 392 11 1 76 329 1,166 29 HV% PHF

0.88 0.93

0.86 0.74

3.1%

1.2%

1.5%

2.3%

1.9% 0.88
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Interval Heavy Vehicles
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 0 0 0 2 2
7:15 AM 0 0 0 3 3
7:30 AM 0 2 0 2 4
7:45 AM 0 2 0 4 6
8:00 AM 0 2 0 1 3
8:15 AM 2 1 1 5 9
8:30 AM 0 2 0 2 4
8:45 AM 1 2 1 2 6
Count Total 3 11 2 21 37
Peak Hour 3 7 2 10 22
Interval Bicycles on Roadway
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 1 0 1
7:45 AM 0 0 1 0 1
8:00 AM 0 1 0 7 8
8:15 AM 3 2 0 4 9
8:30 AM 0 1 0 3 4
8:45 AM 0 2 0 1 3
Count Total 3 6 2 15 26
Peak Hour 3 6 0 15 24
Interval Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 0 1 1 1 3
7:15 AM 0 1 1 1 3
7:30 AM 3 3 2 3 11
7:45 AM 2 0 0 2 4
8:00 AM 5 2 3 0 10
8:15 AM 4 4 2 0 10
8:30 AM 2 0 0 0 2
8:45 AM 3 1 2 3 9
Count Total 19 12 11 10 52
Peak Hour 14 7 7 3 31
137
Item 9 B.

Capitola Avenue Capitola Avenue Bay Avenue Bay Avenue
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 4 Bay Avenue & Capitola Avenue AM
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022
Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Motorized Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Study Peak Hour (for all study intersections)
Study Peak Hour: 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
Peak 15-Minutes in Study Peak Hour: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM Traffic Counts - Heavy Vehicles, Bicycles on Road, and Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk 208 156
390
292
176 131
338
443

0.83 N
S
EW

0.68 0.92

0.91 0.76
(314) (249)
(624)
(405)
(726)
(522)
(311) (231) 62078
45 318
27 81
201
56 0
0 68
0635513
Capitola Avenue
Capitola Avenue
Bay Avenue
Bay Avenue
8 10
12 5 N
S
W E 5 5
2 10
2 6 4 1
310
0 2
0 2
2 3
7 4
2 3
35 7
7 N
S
W E
0 0 3
0210
Interval
Start Time Left Thru Right Total
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn
Rolling
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Hour 7:00 AM 0 5 14 6 0 1 27 1 0 10 12 1 0 2 6 5 90 621
7:15 AM 0 10 16 12 0 4 30 2 0 9 6 2 0 4 20 6 121 817
7:30 AM 0 7 37 23 0 3 76 4 0 17 7 1 0 6 10 12 203 1,018 7:45 AM 0 14 31 17 0 6 70 9 0 12 14 2 0 6 16 10 207 1,067 8:00 AM 0 11 59 19 0 6 80 20 0 15 17 2 0 26 13 18 286 1,070 8:15 AM 0 15 78 18 0 8 86 8 0 16 10 7 0 38 22 16 322
8:30 AM 0 16 33 27 0 7 82 8 0 20 14 2 0 8 17 18 252
8:45 AM 0 10 21 23 0 7 69 10 0 13 19 3 0 6 20 9 210
Count Total 0 88 289 145 0 42 520 62 0 112 99 20 0 96 124 1,691 94 Peak Hour 0 56 201 81 0 27 318 45 0 63 55 13 0 78 68 1,067 62 HV% PHF

0.76 0.92

0.91 0.68

2.1%

0.5%

2.3%

3.4%

1.8% 0.83
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Interval Heavy Vehicles
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 2 0 0 0 2
7:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1
7:30 AM 1 0 2 0 3
7:45 AM 2 0 2 2 6
8:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1
8:15 AM 2 1 0 1 4
8:30 AM 3 2 0 3 8
8:45 AM 1 0 3 1 5
Count Total 12 3 7 8 30
Peak Hour 7 3 2 7 19
Interval Bicycles on Roadway
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 2 0 0 2
8:00 AM 6 0 3 2 11
8:15 AM 3 1 0 1 5
8:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1
8:45 AM 0 1 1 0 2
Count Total 10 4 4 3 21
Peak Hour 10 3 3 3 19
Interval Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 0 2 0 0 2
7:15 AM 3 1 2 1 7
7:30 AM 1 1 2 1 5
7:45 AM 1 0 1 2 4
8:00 AM 3 6 3 3 15
8:15 AM 0 4 4 2 10
8:30 AM 1 2 2 1 6
8:45 AM 1 6 1 3 11
Count Total 10 22 15 13 60
Peak Hour 5 12 10 8 35
138
Item 9 B.

Hill Street Hill Street Capitola Ave Capitola Ave
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 5 Capitola Ave & Hill Street AM
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022
Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Motorized Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Study Peak Hour (for all study intersections)
Study Peak Hour: 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
Peak 15-Minutes in Study Peak Hour: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM Traffic Counts - Heavy Vehicles, Bicycles on Road, and Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk 275 173
100
39 174 100
85 174

0.78 N
S
EW

0.72 0.78

0.71 0.79
(434) (264)
(162)
(52)
(330)
(135)
(253) (168) 104016
34 60
6 13
22 50
0 0 155
010891 Hill Street Hill Street Capitola Ave
Capitola Ave
1 13
6 5 N
S
W E 4 9
3 3
0 1 3 2
100
0 0
0 1
1 0
3 3
0 1
33 2
1 N
S
W E
0 0 2
0030
Interval
Start Time Left Thru Right Total
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn
Rolling
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Hour 7:00 AM 0 3 4 0 0 2 9 1 0 7 4 0 0 0 8 13 51 291
7:15 AM 0 7 0 3 0 0 5 4 0 1 9 0 0 0 21 22 72 411
7:30 AM 0 5 1 0 0 0 13 2 0 6 9 1 0 0 15 25 77 519
7:45 AM 0 7 1 1 0 1 15 3 0 2 15 1 0 3 20 22 91 560
8:00 AM 0 15 7 2 0 2 18 12 0 2 33 0 0 4 47 29 171 608
8:15 AM 0 18 6 3 0 3 13 14 0 3 25 0 0 8 57 30 180
8:30 AM 0 10 8 7 0 0 14 5 0 3 16 0 0 1 31 23 118
8:45 AM 0 21 4 2 0 4 16 6 0 9 20 2 0 1 24 30 139
Count Total 0 86 31 18 0 12 103 47 0 33 131 4 0 17 223 194 899 Peak Hour 0 50 22 13 0 6 60 34 0 10 89 1 0 16 155 104 560 HV% PHF

0.79 0.78

0.71 0.72

2.4%

0.0%

3.0%

1.1%

1.4% 0.78
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Interval Heavy Vehicles
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 1 1 0 2 4
8:15 AM 0 0 0 1 1
8:30 AM 1 2 0 0 3
8:45 AM 0 0 0 2 2
Count Total 2 3 0 5 10
Peak Hour 2 3 0 3 8
Interval Bicycles on Roadway
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1
7:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1
7:30 AM 0 0 1 3 4
7:45 AM 0 1 0 4 5
8:00 AM 0 1 1 2 4
8:15 AM 2 0 0 4 6
8:30 AM 0 0 0 1 1
8:45 AM 0 1 1 0 2
Count Total 2 4 4 14 24
Peak Hour 2 2 1 11 16
Interval Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
7:00 AM 1 0 2 0 3
7:15 AM 0 0 3 0 3
7:30 AM 3 0 4 0 7
7:45 AM 1 1 4 0 6
8:00 AM 3 2 7 1 13
8:15 AM 1 1 2 0 4
8:30 AM 0 2 0 0 2
8:45 AM 0 0 3 0 3
Count Total 9 6 25 1 41
Peak Hour 5 6 13 1 25
139
Item 9 B.

CABRILLO HWY CABRILLO HWY BAY AVE BAY AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 1 BAY AVE & CABRILLO HWY PM
Date: Tuesday, September 13, 2022
Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Motorized Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Peak Hour
Peak Hour: 02:45 PM - 03:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 03:00 PM - 03:15 PM
Traffic Counts - Heavy Vehicles, Bicycles on Road, and Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk 1,024 674
353
0 796 792
0 699

0.96 N
S
EW

0.90 0.93

0.86 0.00
(1,877) (1,267)
(698)
()
(1,308)
()
(1,498) (1,498) 3530
0 225
3 125
0 0
0 0
0 671
0343 4490 CABRILLO HWY CABRILLO HWY BAY AVE

BAY AVE
0 5
0 23
N
S
W E 1 4
0 0
0 0 18 5
400
1 0
1 0
0 0
11 1
2 0
68 0
10 N
S
W E
0 0 7
0600
Interval
Start Time Left Thru Right Total
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn
Rolling
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Hour 2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 34 0 79 85 0 0 0 120 78 438 1,987 2:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 59 0 81 124 0 0 0 150 81 526 2,116 2:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 47 0 85 103 0 0 0 152 72 492 2,138 2:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 57 0 72 90 0 0 0 199 87 531 2,169 3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 40 1 50 0 103 128 0 0 0 163 82 567 2,086 3:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 30 2 60 0 96 107 0 0 0 151 102 548
3:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 58 0 72 124 0 0 0 158 82 523
3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 32 4 63 0 71 78 0 0 0 142 58 448
Count Total 0 0 0 0 0 263 7 428 0 659 839 0 0 0 1,235 4,073 642 Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 125 3 225 0 343 449 0 0 0 671 2,169 353 HV% PHF

0.00 0.93

0.86 0.90

0.0%

0.6%

0.8%

1.1%

0.9% 0.96
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Interval Heavy Vehicles
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
2:00 PM 0 1 4 3 8
2:15 PM 0 3 2 3 8
2:30 PM 0 3 0 3 6
2:45 PM 0 2 0 3 5
3:00 PM 0 1 1 3 5
3:15 PM 0 0 1 3 4
3:30 PM 0 3 0 2 5
3:45 PM 0 2 2 0 4
Count Total 0 15 10 20 45
Peak Hour 0 6 2 11 19
Interval Bicycles on Roadway
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
2:00 PM 0 0 0 1 1
2:15 PM 0 0 0 1 1
2:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1
2:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 PM 0 5 0 3 8
3:15 PM 0 4 0 3 7
3:30 PM 0 2 0 0 2
3:45 PM 0 0 0 4 4
Count Total 0 12 0 12 24
Peak Hour 0 11 0 6 17
Interval Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
2:00 PM 2 0 3 0 5
2:15 PM 1 0 2 0 3
2:30 PM 0 0 3 0 3
2:45 PM 3 0 1 0 4
3:00 PM 5 0 2 0 7
3:15 PM 0 0 2 0 2
3:30 PM 15 0 0 0 15
3:45 PM 2 0 0 0 2
Count Total 28 0 13 0 41
Peak Hour 23 0 5 0 28
140
Item 9 B.

CABRILLO HWY CABRILLO HWY BAY AVE BAY AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 2 BAY AVE & CABRILLO HWY PM
Date: Tuesday, September 13, 2022
Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Motorized Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Peak Hour
Peak Hour: 02:45 PM - 03:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 03:00 PM - 03:15 PM
Traffic Counts - Heavy Vehicles, Bicycles on Road, and Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk 788 759
0 514
789 682
592
0 0.92
N
S
EW

0.90 0.00

0.91 0.93
(1,506) (1,457)
()
(983)
()
(1,116)
(1,487) (1,305)
00 290
0 0
0 291
97 204
0 0 498
00555 127 CABRILLO HWY CABRILLO HWY BAY AVE

BAY AVE
0 12
0 20
N
S
W E 7 5
0 0
0 0 15 5
040
0 0
0 3
0 0
6 7
0 4
75 3
0 N
S
W E
0 0 2
0070
Interval
Start Time Left Thru Right Total
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn
Rolling
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Hour 2:00 PM 0 57 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 44 0 63 110 0 441 1,903 2:15 PM 0 71 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 36 0 77 99 0 483 2,021 2:30 PM 0 41 4 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 38 0 85 99 0 477 2,053 2:45 PM 0 48 18 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 30 0 73 148 0 502 2,062 3:00 PM 0 64 26 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 27 0 76 125 0 559 2,024 3:15 PM 0 38 14 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 158 39 0 66 120 0 515
3:30 PM 0 54 39 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 31 0 75 105 0 486
3:45 PM 0 42 37 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 18 0 67 118 0 464
Count Total 0 415 138 563 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,042 263 0 582 924 3,927 0 Peak Hour 0 204 97 291 0 0 0 0 0 0 555 127 0 290 498 2,062 0 HV% PHF

0.93 0.00

0.91 0.90

0.5%

0.0%

1.0%

0.8%

0.8% 0.92
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Interval Heavy Vehicles
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
2:00 PM 1 0 0 4 5
2:15 PM 1 1 0 1 3
2:30 PM 1 4 0 3 8
2:45 PM 1 3 0 1 5
3:00 PM 0 1 0 2 3
3:15 PM 1 1 0 1 3
3:30 PM 1 2 0 2 5
3:45 PM 2 2 0 0 4
Count Total 8 14 0 14 36
Peak Hour 3 7 0 6 16
Interval Bicycles on Roadway
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
2:00 PM 0 0 0 2 2
2:15 PM 0 1 0 1 2
2:30 PM 0 5 0 0 5
2:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 PM 0 6 0 3 9
3:15 PM 0 2 0 1 3
3:30 PM 0 1 0 3 4
3:45 PM 0 0 0 6 6
Count Total 0 15 0 16 31
Peak Hour 0 9 0 7 16
Interval Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
2:00 PM 2 0 3 0 5
2:15 PM 1 0 2 0 3
2:30 PM 0 0 3 0 3
2:45 PM 4 0 1 0 5
3:00 PM 5 0 4 0 9
3:15 PM 0 0 5 0 5
3:30 PM 11 0 2 0 13
3:45 PM 4 0 1 0 5
Count Total 27 0 21 0 48
Peak Hour 20 0 12 0 32
141
Item 9 B.

HILL ST HILL ST BAY AVE BAY AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 3 BAY AVE & HILL ST PM
Date: Tuesday, September 13, 2022
Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Motorized Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Peak Hour
Peak Hour: 02:30 PM - 03:30 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 03:00 PM - 03:15 PM
Traffic Counts - Heavy Vehicles, Bicycles on Road, and Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk 635 581
144
192
541 485
188
138

0.90 N
S
EW

0.91 0.91

0.90 0.79
(1,177) (1,066)
(281)
(363)
(274)
(368)
(1,011) (888) 530 124
104
25 15
68 45
75 0
0 458
060402 23 HILL ST HILL ST BAY AVE

BAY AVE
8 10
24 9 N
S
W E 5 5
13 11
5 3 5 4
210
2 0
1 0
0 2
7 7
3 1
35 2
2 N
S
W E
0 0 4
0030
Interval
Start Time Left Thru Right Total
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn
Rolling
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Hour 2:00 PM 0 20 8 13 0 6 7 18 0 10 87 10 0 22 85 10 296 1,317 2:15 PM 0 27 7 15 0 6 8 27 0 15 92 9 0 34 96 13 349 1,423 2:30 PM 0 15 8 16 0 3 3 20 0 11 104 8 0 27 90 13 318 1,452 2:45 PM 0 13 13 16 0 4 7 29 0 18 73 5 0 33 130 13 354 1,445 3:00 PM 0 23 18 21 0 3 6 28 0 18 112 4 0 28 129 12 402 1,397 3:15 PM 0 24 6 15 0 5 9 27 0 13 113 6 0 36 109 15 378
3:30 PM 0 15 12 18 0 4 9 18 0 12 79 6 0 26 101 11 311
3:45 PM 0 22 11 12 0 7 9 18 0 19 62 2 0 24 107 13 306
Count Total 0 159 83 126 0 38 58 185 0 116 722 50 0 230 847 2,714 100 Peak Hour 0 75 45 68 0 15 25 104 0 60 402 23 0 124 458 1,452 53 HV% PHF

0.79 0.91

0.90 0.91

1.1%

2.1%

0.6%

1.1%

1.0% 0.90
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Interval Heavy Vehicles
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
2:00 PM 0 0 1 3 4
2:15 PM 0 0 1 2 3
2:30 PM 1 2 0 2 5
2:45 PM 0 1 1 2 4
3:00 PM 1 0 0 1 2
3:15 PM 0 0 2 2 4
3:30 PM 1 0 2 5 8
3:45 PM 1 0 1 1 3
Count Total 4 3 8 18 33
Peak Hour 2 3 3 7 15
Interval Bicycles on Roadway
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
2:00 PM 3 0 1 1 5
2:15 PM 0 0 0 1 1
2:30 PM 3 0 1 0 4
2:45 PM 1 0 0 1 2
3:00 PM 2 8 0 3 13
3:15 PM 1 3 0 2 6
3:30 PM 1 1 0 2 4
3:45 PM 1 1 1 3 6
Count Total 12 13 3 13 41
Peak Hour 7 11 1 6 25
Interval Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
2:00 PM 0 0 1 2 3
2:15 PM 1 3 0 2 6
2:30 PM 3 3 2 2 10
2:45 PM 2 3 3 1 9
3:00 PM 1 7 1 3 12
3:15 PM 3 11 4 2 20
3:30 PM 9 4 4 1 18
3:45 PM 4 2 2 3 11
Count Total 23 33 17 16 89
Peak Hour 9 24 10 8 51
142
Item 9 B.

CAPITOLA AVE CAPITOLA AVE BAY AVE BAY AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 4 BAY AVE & CAPITOLA AVE PM
Date: Tuesday, September 13, 2022
Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Motorized Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Peak Hour
Peak Hour: 02:30 PM - 03:30 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 03:00 PM - 03:15 PM
Traffic Counts - Heavy Vehicles, Bicycles on Road, and Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk 501 436
195
167
404 334
209
232

0.92 N
S
EW

0.96 0.87

0.84 0.90
(910) (781)
(324)
(338)
(463)
(393)
(665) (620) 136059
52 63
80 18
73 118
0 0 306
033266 35 CAPITOLA AVE CAPITOLA AVE BAY AVE

BAY AVE
6 36
25 22
N
S
W E 34 2
18 7
2 4 6 16
300
1 4
0 0
2 0
6 3
5 4
43 2
7 N
S
W E
0 0 3
0022
Interval
Start Time Left Thru Right Total
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn
Rolling
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Hour 2:00 PM 0 24 15 4 0 6 16 11 0 5 56 9 0 18 28 41 233 1,077 2:15 PM 0 27 24 4 0 13 17 8 0 8 57 8 0 14 39 43 262 1,182 2:30 PM 0 34 23 4 0 12 18 14 0 9 48 11 0 11 79 34 297 1,239 2:45 PM 0 26 19 4 0 18 13 11 0 7 52 5 0 13 88 29 285 1,192 3:00 PM 0 31 16 8 0 26 14 16 0 9 82 12 0 20 67 37 338 1,170 3:15 PM 0 27 15 2 0 24 18 11 0 8 84 7 0 15 72 36 319
3:30 PM 0 14 13 8 0 8 16 7 0 6 68 7 0 14 65 24 250
3:45 PM 0 21 24 6 0 4 15 8 0 10 44 8 0 17 76 30 263
Count Total 0 204 149 40 0 111 127 86 0 62 491 67 0 122 514 2,247 274 Peak Hour 0 118 73 18 0 80 63 52 0 33 266 35 0 59 306 1,239 136 HV% PHF

0.90 0.87

0.84 0.96

1.0%

2.6%

1.2%

1.2%

1.4% 0.92
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Interval Heavy Vehicles
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
2:00 PM 1 0 0 2 3
2:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0
2:30 PM 0 2 2 3 7
2:45 PM 2 1 1 0 4
3:00 PM 0 0 0 1 1
3:15 PM 0 1 2 2 5
3:30 PM 0 0 0 3 3
3:45 PM 1 1 0 1 3
Count Total 4 5 5 12 26
Peak Hour 2 4 5 6 17
Interval Bicycles on Roadway
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
2:00 PM 0 0 1 1 2
2:15 PM 0 0 1 2 3
2:30 PM 0 1 0 1 2
2:45 PM 0 0 0 2 2
3:00 PM 0 8 0 1 9
3:15 PM 0 1 0 1 2
3:30 PM 0 1 2 2 5
3:45 PM 2 0 1 2 5
Count Total 2 11 5 12 30
Peak Hour 0 10 0 5 15
Interval Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
2:00 PM 2 2 1 0 5
2:15 PM 1 1 1 0 3
2:30 PM 0 5 2 2 9
2:45 PM 3 3 1 2 9
3:00 PM 8 7 16 0 31
3:15 PM 11 10 17 2 40
3:30 PM 5 1 1 1 8
3:45 PM 6 1 4 5 16
Count Total 36 30 43 12 121
Peak Hour 22 25 36 6 89
143
Item 9 B.

Highway 1 NB Ramps Highway 1 NB Ramps Bay Avenue Bay Avenue (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 1 Bay Avenue & Highway 1 NB Ramps PM
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022
Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Motorized Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Study Peak Hour (for all study intersections)
Study Peak Hour: 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM
Peak 15-Minutes in Study Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM Traffic Counts - Heavy Vehicles, Bicycles on Road, and Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk 935 610
325
0 735 660
0 575

0.96 N
S
EW

0.91 0.94

0.88 0.00
(1,820) (1,163)
(592)
()
(1,150)
()
(1,446) (1,347) 2870
0 236
2 87
0 0
0 0
0 648
0286 3740 Highway 1 NB Ramps
Highway 1 NB Ramps
Bay Avenue
Bay Avenue
0 5
0 6 N
S
W E 3 2
0 0
0 0 4 2
100
2 0
0 0
0 0
4 3
2 0
33 0
3 N
S
W E
0 0 3
0210
Interval
Start Time Left Thru Right Total
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn
Rolling
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Hour 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 46 0 76 100 0 0 0 191 81 512 1,915 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 43 0 75 93 0 0 0 159 70 467 1,901 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 56 0 77 85 0 0 0 178 78 496 1,920 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 19 1 66 0 61 90 0 0 0 144 59 440 1,878 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 57 0 83 104 0 0 0 163 71 498 1,844 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 26 1 57 0 65 95 0 0 0 163 79 486
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 47 0 77 105 0 0 0 140 56 454
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 35 0 77 84 0 0 0 125 63 406
Count Total 0 0 0 0 0 183 2 407 0 591 756 0 0 0 1,263 3,759 557 Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 87 2 236 0 286 374 0 0 0 648 1,920 287 HV% PHF

0.00 0.94

0.88 0.91

0.0%

0.6%

0.5%

0.4%

0.5% 0.96
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Interval Heavy Vehicles
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 0 0 2 4 6
4:15 PM 0 3 2 2 7
4:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1
4:45 PM 0 0 1 1 2
5:00 PM 0 1 0 1 2
5:15 PM 0 1 1 2 4
5:30 PM 0 1 1 1 3
5:45 PM 0 1 0 2 3
Count Total 0 8 7 13 28
Peak Hour 0 3 2 4 9
Interval Bicycles on Roadway
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 0 3 0 1 4
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 4 0 3 7
4:45 PM 0 1 0 4 5
5:00 PM 0 1 0 2 3
5:15 PM 0 1 0 1 2
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 3 3
Count Total 0 10 0 14 24
Peak Hour 0 7 0 10 17
Interval Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 2 0 3 0 5
4:30 PM 1 0 2 0 3
4:45 PM 3 0 2 0 5
5:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1
5:15 PM 2 0 0 0 2
5:30 PM 1 0 3 0 4
5:45 PM 2 0 3 0 5
Count Total 11 0 14 0 25
Peak Hour 6 0 5 0 11
144
Item 9 B.

Highway 1 SB Ramps Highway 1 SB Ramps Bay Avenue Bay Avenue (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 2 Bay Avenue & Highway 1 SB Ramps PM
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022
Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Motorized Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Study Peak Hour (for all study intersections)
Study Peak Hour: 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes in Study Peak Hour: 04:00 PM - 04:15 PM Traffic Counts - Heavy Vehicles, Bicycles on Road, and Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk 765 645
0 599
768 587
660
0 0.91
N
S
EW

0.91 0.00

0.93 0.89
(1,458) (1,322)
()
(1,122)
()
(1,398)
(1,570) (1,158)
00 317
0 0
0 320
155
185
0 0 448
00460 127
Highway 1 SB Ramps
Highway 1 SB Ramps
Bay Avenue
Bay Avenue
0 7
0 7 N
S
W E 6 1
0 0
0 0 4 3
040
0 0
0 2
0 0
6 4
0 4
44 2
0 N
S
W E
0 0 2
0040
Interval
Start Time Left Thru Right Total
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn
Rolling
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Hour 4:00 PM 0 54 35 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 37 0 96 114 0 550 2,012 4:15 PM 0 43 33 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 33 0 80 113 0 493 1,976 4:30 PM 0 45 43 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 30 0 84 116 0 500 1,999 4:45 PM 0 43 44 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 27 0 57 105 0 469 1,992 5:00 PM 0 56 44 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 33 0 80 107 0 514 2,002 5:15 PM 0 57 39 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 30 0 61 128 0 516
5:30 PM 0 56 42 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 17 0 64 110 0 493
5:45 PM 0 52 28 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 35 0 50 93 0 479
Count Total 0 406 308 684 0 0 0 0 0 0 916 242 0 572 886 4,014 0 Peak Hour 0 185 155 320 0 0 0 0 0 0 460 127 0 317 448 2,012 0 HV% PHF

0.89 0.00

0.93 0.91

0.3%

0.0%

0.7%

0.8%

0.6% 0.91
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Interval Heavy Vehicles
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 1 0 0 3 4
4:15 PM 0 3 0 2 5
4:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1
4:45 PM 1 0 0 1 2
5:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1
5:15 PM 1 1 0 2 4
5:30 PM 1 1 0 1 3
5:45 PM 4 0 0 1 5
Count Total 9 6 0 10 25
Peak Hour 2 4 0 6 12
Interval Bicycles on Roadway
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 0 3 0 0 3
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 3 0 3 6
4:45 PM 0 0 0 3 3
5:00 PM 0 1 0 2 3
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 3 3
Count Total 0 7 0 11 18
Peak Hour 0 6 0 6 12
Interval Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 4 0 3 0 7
4:30 PM 1 0 3 0 4
4:45 PM 2 0 1 0 3
5:00 PM 2 0 1 0 3
5:15 PM 1 0 0 0 1
5:30 PM 1 0 2 0 3
5:45 PM 3 0 2 0 5
Count Total 14 0 12 0 26
Peak Hour 7 0 7 0 14
145
Item 9 B.

Hill Street Hill Street Bay Avenue Bay Avenue
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 3 Bay Avenue & Hill Street PM
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022
Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Motorized Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Study Peak Hour (for all study intersections)
Study Peak Hour: 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes in Study Peak Hour: 04:00 PM - 04:15 PM Traffic Counts - Heavy Vehicles, Bicycles on Road, and Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk 633 456
143
199
542 392
212
183

0.98 N
S
EW

0.92 0.83

0.94 0.90
(1,297) (908)
(257)
(428)
(335)
(427)
(1,085) (775) 521 142
76 45
22 79
44 89
0 0 438
386290 13 Hill Street Hill Street Bay Avenue
Bay Avenue
14 10
17 8 N
S
W E 6 4
5 12
7 7 5 3
000
1 0
1 0
0 0
3 3
2 0
24 0
0 N
S
W E
0 0 3
0020
Interval
Start Time Left Thru Right Total
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn
Rolling
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Hour 4:00 PM 0 23 9 16 0 7 18 18 1 17 69 3 1 41 120 9 352 1,380 4:15 PM 0 19 10 18 0 3 10 25 1 20 79 4 0 25 99 13 326 1,368 4:30 PM 0 22 15 22 0 7 9 21 0 25 72 4 0 36 99 18 350 1,382 4:45 PM 0 25 10 23 0 5 8 12 1 24 70 2 0 40 120 12 352 1,383 5:00 PM 0 23 13 21 0 2 10 15 0 20 84 2 1 44 93 12 340 1,376 5:15 PM 0 21 18 20 0 5 4 17 0 16 63 4 0 32 127 13 340
5:30 PM 0 17 15 13 0 1 6 16 0 18 82 8 0 34 126 15 351
5:45 PM 0 21 14 19 0 4 12 22 0 12 70 4 0 41 112 14 345
Count Total 0 171 104 152 0 34 77 146 3 152 589 31 2 293 896 2,756 106 Peak Hour 0 89 44 79 0 22 45 76 3 86 290 13 1 142 438 1,380 52 HV% PHF

0.90 0.83

0.94 0.92

0.0%

1.4%

0.5%

0.5%

0.5% 0.98
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Interval Heavy Vehicles
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 0 0 0 1 1
4:15 PM 0 1 1 1 3
4:30 PM 0 1 1 0 2
4:45 PM 0 0 0 1 1
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1
5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 1
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0
Count Total 0 3 2 4 9
Peak Hour 0 2 2 3 7
Interval Bicycles on Roadway
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 1 0 0 1 2
4:15 PM 2 1 0 0 3
4:30 PM 0 4 1 3 8
4:45 PM 2 0 2 2 6
5:00 PM 3 0 1 1 5
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 2 0 2 4
Count Total 8 7 4 9 28
Peak Hour 5 5 3 6 19
Interval Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 3 3 3 2 11
4:15 PM 0 2 1 4 7
4:30 PM 3 6 2 4 15
4:45 PM 2 6 4 4 16
5:00 PM 0 6 2 1 9
5:15 PM 3 4 2 2 11
5:30 PM 0 5 2 0 7
5:45 PM 0 4 7 5 16
Count Total 11 36 23 22 92
Peak Hour 8 17 10 14 49
146
Item 9 B.

Capitola Avenue Capitola Avenue Bay Avenue Bay Avenue
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 4 Bay Avenue & Capitola Avenue PM
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022
Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Motorized Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Study Peak Hour (for all study intersections)
Study Peak Hour: 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes in Study Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:00 PM Traffic Counts - Heavy Vehicles, Bicycles on Road, and Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk 151 174
289
347
196 203
478
404

0.98 N
S
EW

0.90 0.89

0.91 0.87
(298) (371)
(557)
(716)
(742)
(960)
(375) (389) 62041
24 242
23 125
281
72 0
0 48
0100 7825
Capitola Avenue
Capitola Avenue
Bay Avenue
Bay Avenue
14 15
13 5 N
S
W E 10 5
10 3
10 4 0 5
020
0 4
0 1
2 1
2 2
4 4
21 4
5 N
S
W E
0 0 0
0110
Interval
Start Time Left Thru Right Total
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn
Rolling
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Hour 4:00 PM 0 25 78 34 0 7 57 6 0 19 19 3 0 10 5 17 280 1,121 4:15 PM 0 21 56 27 0 4 70 7 0 26 22 8 0 10 14 16 281 1,109 4:30 PM 0 12 72 38 0 4 49 5 0 28 17 8 0 14 15 13 275 1,106 4:45 PM 0 14 75 26 0 8 66 6 0 27 20 6 0 7 14 16 285 1,109 5:00 PM 0 16 72 21 0 4 56 6 0 22 21 11 0 9 17 13 268 1,083 5:15 PM 0 26 89 25 0 3 52 5 0 17 18 6 0 9 17 11 278
5:30 PM 0 17 65 24 0 8 60 8 0 21 24 6 0 15 17 13 278
5:45 PM 0 20 79 28 0 6 47 13 0 14 23 3 0 5 9 12 259
Count Total 0 151 586 223 0 44 457 56 0 174 164 51 0 79 108 2,204 111 Peak Hour 0 72 281 125 0 23 242 24 0 100 78 25 0 41 48 1,121 62 HV% PHF

0.87 0.89

0.91 0.90

0.8%

1.4%

1.0%

1.3%

1.1% 0.98
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Interval Heavy Vehicles
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 1 1 1 1 4
4:15 PM 1 1 0 0 2
4:30 PM 1 0 2 1 4
4:45 PM 1 0 1 0 2
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 1 1 0 2
5:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0
Count Total 4 4 5 2 15
Peak Hour 4 2 4 2 12
Interval Bicycles on Roadway
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 1 3 0 4 8
4:15 PM 0 0 1 0 1
4:30 PM 2 0 0 0 2
4:45 PM 0 1 0 1 2
5:00 PM 1 2 1 1 5
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 1
5:45 PM 2 0 1 0 3
Count Total 6 6 3 7 22
Peak Hour 3 4 1 5 13
Interval Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 0 2 6 5 13
4:15 PM 2 4 5 3 14
4:30 PM 0 4 0 0 4
4:45 PM 3 3 4 6 16
5:00 PM 4 5 5 4 18
5:15 PM 2 3 2 7 14
5:30 PM 1 1 4 4 10
5:45 PM 2 0 4 4 10
Count Total 14 22 30 33 99
Peak Hour 5 13 15 14 47
147
Item 9 B.

Hill Street Hill Street Capitola Ave Capitola Ave
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 5 Capitola Ave & Hill Street PM
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022
Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Motorized Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Study Peak Hour (for all study intersections)
Study Peak Hour: 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes in Study Peak Hour: 04:00 PM - 04:15 PM Traffic Counts - Heavy Vehicles, Bicycles on Road, and Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk 174 239
58 81
109 123
207
133

0.95 N
S
EW

0.91 0.73

0.88 0.91
(347) (505)
(98)
(155)
(244)
(433)
(230) (256) 70022
16 39
3 24
52 131
0 0 82
024927 Hill Street Hill Street Capitola Ave
Capitola Ave
3 18
10 2 N
S
W E 13 5
4 6
1 2 1 1
100
0 1
0 0
0 0
2 1
1 0
11 0
2 N
S
W E
0 0 1
0010
Interval
Start Time Left Thru Right Total
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn
Rolling
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Hour 4:00 PM 0 33 13 3 0 1 8 8 0 6 27 2 0 5 25 18 149 562
4:15 PM 0 24 13 8 0 0 18 2 0 5 21 1 0 8 18 19 137 557
4:30 PM 0 37 12 8 0 2 8 4 0 8 20 0 0 4 16 19 138 558
4:45 PM 0 37 14 5 0 0 5 2 0 5 24 4 0 5 23 14 138 568
5:00 PM 0 38 15 6 0 2 5 3 0 3 28 0 0 5 22 17 144 572
5:15 PM 0 37 9 5 0 1 7 2 0 7 29 0 0 4 26 11 138
5:30 PM 0 38 15 6 0 1 6 2 0 7 26 0 0 7 26 14 148
5:45 PM 0 34 15 8 0 0 8 3 0 5 26 2 0 2 18 21 142
Count Total 0 278 106 49 0 7 65 26 0 46 201 9 0 40 174 1,134 133 Peak Hour 0 131 52 24 0 3 39 16 0 24 92 7 0 22 82 70 562 HV% PHF

0.91 0.73

0.88 0.91

0.0%

1.7%

0.8%

1.1%

0.7% 0.95
EB
WB
NB
SB
All
Interval Heavy Vehicles
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1
4:15 PM 0 0 1 0 1
4:30 PM 0 0 0 1 1
4:45 PM 0 0 0 1 1
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0
Count Total 0 2 1 2 5
Peak Hour 0 1 1 2 4
Interval Bicycles on Roadway
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 0 1 2 2 5
4:15 PM 1 1 0 3 5
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 1 1 3 5
5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 1
5:15 PM 1 2 0 0 3
5:30 PM 1 0 0 2 3
5:45 PM 0 0 0 1 1
Count Total 3 5 3 12 23
Peak Hour 1 3 3 8 15
Interval Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk
Start Time EB NB WB SB Total
4:00 PM 1 3 5 1 10
4:15 PM 0 2 6 1 9
4:30 PM 1 1 2 1 5
4:45 PM 0 4 5 0 9
5:00 PM 1 4 5 1 11
5:15 PM 1 1 2 0 4
5:30 PM 2 0 6 1 9
5:45 PM 2 2 6 0 10
Count Total 8 17 37 5 67
Peak Hour 2 10 18 3 33
148
Item 9 B.

SWITRS COLLISION DATA – Bay Avenue / Hill Street Intersection (2017 to 2022) 149
Item 9 B.

SWITRS COLLISION DATA – Bay Avenue / Hill Street Intersection (2017 to 2022) 150
Item 9 B.

SWITRS COLLISION DATA – Bay Avenue / Hill Street Intersection (2017 to 2022) 151
Item 9 B.

Capitola Police Department Collision Data
ACPED
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Case # 17C-00845 None 19C01981 None None 22C01538 23C-01056 Location Bay Av S
Hill St
809 Bay
Ave
- Nob
Hill
Parking
Lot
Bay Av S
Hill St
Bay Av
/ Hill St
ACBike
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Case # 18C01395 None None 21C01221
22C01007 None
Location
800
Bay
Ave
828
Bay
Ave
809 Bay
Ave
- Nob
Hill
Parking
Lot
*Note: Highlighted data was at the study intersection; all other data was in the vicinity, but not intersection related.
152
Item 9 B.

Bay / Hill – Intersection Operations Analysis
Attachment B – Intersection Alternative Concept Layouts 153
Item 9 B.

NORTH
CITY OF CAPITOLA - BAY/HILL INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS ALTERNATIVE 2 ROUNDABOUT CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR PLANNING PURPOSES. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

CROSSROADS LOOP BAY AVENUE

NOB HILL

DRIVEWAY

HILL STREET

NOB HILL

DRIVEWAY
154
Item 9 B.

NORTH
CITY OF CAPITOLA - BAY/HILL INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS ALTERNATIVE 3 ALL-WAY STOP WITH ROAD DIET CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR PLANNING PURPOSES. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

CROSSROADS LOOP BAY AVENUE

NOB HILL

DRIVEWAY

HILL STREET

NOB HILL

DRIVEWAY
155
Item 9 B.

Bay / Hill – Intersection Operations Analysis
Attachment C – Synchro and Sidra LOS Results
156
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing AM
1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 69 3 139 390 538 0 0 407 474 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 69 3 139 390 538 0 0 407 474 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1900 1885 1885 1856 0 0 1870 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 73 3 146 411 566 0 0 428 499
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 501130021
Cap, veh/h 214 4 195 742 2574 0 0 426 353
Arrive On Green 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.83 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1739 33 1583 1795 3618 0 0 1870 1469
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 73 0 149 411 566 0 0 428 499
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1739 0 1615 1795 1763 0 0 1777 1469 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 0.0 5.3 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 0.0 5.3 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 214 0 199 742 2574 0 0 426 353
V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.00 0.75 0.55 0.22 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 371 0 345 742 2574 0 0 426 353
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.1 0.0 25.4 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 22.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 2.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 44.5 202.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.9 24.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.4 0.0 27.5 3.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 67.3 225.6 LnGrp LOS C A C AAAAFF
Approach Vol, veh/h 222 977 927
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.5 1.7 152.5
Approach LOS C A F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.4 19.0 11.6 48.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.6 * 4.2 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.3 * 14 * 13 38.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 16.4 7.3 2.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 70.0
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 157
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing AM
2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 317 0 263 0 0 0 0 604 125 188 308 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 317 0 263 0 0 0 0 604 125 188 308 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1900 1856 0 1885 1856 1870 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 420 0 185 0 636 132 198 324 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 0 3 013230
Cap, veh/h 542 0 245 0 852 176 589 2459 0
Arrive On Green 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.11 0.23 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3478 0 1572 0 3031 608 1781 3618 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 420 0 185 0 387 381 198 324 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1739 0 1572 0 1791 1754 1781 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 11.8 11.8 6.2 4.4 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 11.8 11.8 6.2 4.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.35 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 542 0 245 0 519 509 589 2459 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.34 0.13 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 742 0 335 0 519 509 589 2459 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.97 0.97 0.75 0.75 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.3 0.0 24.2 0.0 19.3 19.3 20.6 8.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.3 0.0 3.8 0.0 9.1 9.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.8 0.0 2.6 0.0 5.8 5.8 2.6 1.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.6 0.0 28.1 0.0 28.4 28.7 20.7 8.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A C A C C C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 605 768 522
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.0 28.6 13.3
Approach LOS C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.5 24.5 22.0 13.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 * 4.6 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.4 14.3 * 17 12.8
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 8.2 13.8 9.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.9
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 158
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing AM
3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 51 17 30 7 38 134 59 392 12 86 329 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 51 17 30 7 38 134 59 392 12 86 329 29 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1900 1900 1900 1856 1885 1870 1885 1767 1900 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 58 19 34 8 43 152 67 445 14 98 374 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 00031219033
Cap, veh/h 424 113 337 122 81 259 125 977 31 164 969 85 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.07 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1064 527 1570 28 377 1208 1781 3538 111 1810 3267 286 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 77 0 34 203 0 0 67 225 234 98 201 206 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1591 0 1570 1613 0 0 1781 1791 1858 1810 1763 1791 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 3.3 3.4 1.7 2.9 3.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.6 3.6 0.0 0.0 1.2 3.3 3.4 1.7 2.9 3.0 Prop In Lane 0.75 1.00 0.04 0.75 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.16
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 537 0 337 462 0 0 125 494 513 164 523 531 V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.00 0.10 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.45 0.46 0.60 0.38 0.39 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 991 0 877 1013 0 0 276 1000 1038 309 1012 1028 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.4 0.0 10.2 11.4 0.0 0.0 14.5 9.7 9.7 14.1 9.0 9.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.7 0.6 3.5 0.5 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.4 0.0 0.2 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.9 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 10.5 0.0 10.3 12.0 0.0 0.0 18.0 10.3 10.3 17.5 9.5 9.5 LnGrp LOS B ABBAABBBBAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 111 203 526 505
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.4 12.0 11.3 11.0
Approach LOS BBBB
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.4 13.4 11.4 6.8 14.1 11.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s5.5 18.0 18.0 5.0 18.5 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.7 5.4 3.1 3.2 5.0 5.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.3 0.4 0.0 2.1 1.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.2
HCM 6th LOS B
159
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing AM
4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh22.7
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 56 201 81 45 318 27 63 55 13 78 68 62 Future Vol, veh/h 56 201 81 45 318 27 63 55 13 78 68 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 67 242 98 54 383 33 76 66 16 94 82 75
Number of Lanes 0 11110011010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay 18.7 30.8 14.6 19.2

HCM LOS C D B C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 53% 0% 22% 0% 100% 1% 38%
Vol Thru, % 47% 0% 78% 0% 0% 91% 33%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 8% 30%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 118 13 257 81 41 350 208
LT Vol 63 0 56 0 41 5 78
Through Vol 55 0 201 0 0 318 68
RT Vol 0 13 0 81 0 27 62
Lane Flow Rate 142 16 310 98 49 421 251
Geometry Grp 7777776
Degree of Util (X) 0.327 0.032 0.623 0.174 0.101 0.81 0.532 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.281 7.284 7.238 6.407 7.484 6.923 7.642 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 432 489 499 557 478 522 471
Service Time 6.064 5.066 5.008 4.177 5.249 4.688 5.719
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.329 0.033 0.621 0.176 0.103 0.807 0.533 HCM Control Delay 15.1 10.3 21.3 10.5 11.1 33.1 19.2
HCM Lane LOS C B C B B D C
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.4 0.1 4.2 0.6 0.3 7.8 3.1
160
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing AM
5: Capitola Ave & Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 10
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 50 22 13 6 60 34 10 89 1 16 155 104
Future Vol, veh/h 50 22 13 6 60 34 10 89 1 16 155 104
Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 47000030022
Mvmt Flow 64 28 17 8 77 44 13 114 1 21 199 133
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 9.3 9.1 9 10.9

HCM LOS A A A B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 10% 59% 6% 6%
Vol Thru, % 89% 26% 60% 56%
Vol Right, % 1% 15% 34% 38%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 100 85 100 275
LT Vol 10 50 6 16
Through Vol 89 22 60 155
RT Vol 1 13 34 104
Lane Flow Rate 128 109 128 353
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.175 0.157 0.176 0.435
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.917 5.196 4.955 4.441
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 724 684 717 807
Service Time 2.985 3.275 3.033 2.492
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.177 0.159 0.179 0.437
HCM Control Delay 9 9.3 9.1 10.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAB
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.2
161
Item 9 B.
162
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Midday 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 125 3 225 343 449 0 0 671 353 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 125 3 225 343 449 0 0 671 353 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 0 0 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 130 3 234 357 468 0 0 699 368
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 111110011
Cap, veh/h 322 4 283 642 2414 0 0 534 281
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.71 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 20 1580 1795 3676 0 0 2320 1170
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 130 0 237 357 468 0 0 562 505
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 0 1601 1795 1791 0 0 1791 1605 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.8 0.0 8.6 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.8 0.0 8.6 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.73
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 322 0 287 642 2414 0 0 430 385
V/C Ratio(X) 0.40 0.00 0.83 0.56 0.19 0.00 0.00 1.31 1.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 383 0 341 642 2414 0 0 430 385
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.8 0.0 23.7 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 22.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 11.4 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 154.7 157.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 0.0 3.8 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 21.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.1 0.0 35.1 6.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 177.5 179.9 LnGrp LOS C A D AAAAFF
Approach Vol, veh/h 367 825 1067
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.5 3.0 178.6
Approach LOS C A F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.0 19.0 15.0 45.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.6 * 4.2 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.3 * 14 * 13 38.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.6 16.4 10.6 2.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 90.4
HCM 6th LOS F
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 163
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Midday 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 204 97 291 0 0 0 0 555 127 290 498 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 204 97 291 0 0 0 0 555 127 290 498 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1885 0 1885 1885 1885 1885 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 183 240 230 0 603 138 315 541 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 011110
Cap, veh/h 319 335 284 0 836 191 554 2419 0
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.10 0.22 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1885 1598 0 2977 658 1795 3676 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 183 240 230 0 374 367 315 541 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1795 1885 1598 0 1791 1750 1795 1791 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.6 7.2 8.3 0.0 11.2 11.3 10.0 7.4 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.6 7.2 8.3 0.0 11.2 11.3 10.0 7.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.38 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 319 335 284 0 519 508 554 2419 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 0.72 0.81 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.57 0.22 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 383 402 341 0 519 508 554 2419 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.96 0.96 0.34 0.34 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.6 23.2 23.7 0.0 19.1 19.1 23.1 10.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 3.4 9.7 0.0 8.0 8.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.2 3.2 3.6 0.0 5.5 5.4 4.7 2.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.2 26.6 33.4 0.0 27.2 27.5 23.4 10.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C A C C C B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 653 741 856
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.0 27.3 15.3
Approach LOS C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 45.1 23.1 22.0 14.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 * 4.6 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.4 14.3 * 17 12.8
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.4 12.0 13.3 10.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.6 0.1 0.9 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.9
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 164
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Midday 3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 75 45 68 15 25 104 60 402 23 124 458 53 Future Volume (veh/h) 75 45 68 15 25 104 60 402 23 124 458 53 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.97 0.98 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 83 50 76 17 28 116 67 447 26 138 509 59 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 11111111111
Cap, veh/h 360 179 364 135 86 270 124 906 53 192 975 113 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.26 0.26 0.11 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 804 761 1549 80 365 1149 1795 3436 199 1795 3231 373 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 133 0 76 161 0 0 67 232 241 138 281 287 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1565 0 1549 1594 0 0 1795 1791 1845 1795 1791 1814 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 3.8 3.8 2.5 4.5 4.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.0 0.0 1.4 2.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 3.8 3.8 2.5 4.5 4.5 Prop In Lane 0.62 1.00 0.11 0.72 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.21
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 539 0 364 491 0 0 124 472 487 192 540 547 V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.00 0.21 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.49 0.49 0.72 0.52 0.52 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 949 0 814 944 0 0 262 942 970 288 968 980 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.8 0.0 10.5 11.1 0.0 0.0 15.4 10.7 10.7 14.8 9.9 9.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.8 0.8 5.0 0.8 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.7 0.0 0.4 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.0 0.0 10.8 11.5 0.0 0.0 19.1 11.5 11.5 19.8 10.7 10.7 LnGrp LOS B ABBAABBBBBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 209 161 540 706
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.9 11.5 12.4 12.5
Approach LOS BBBB
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.2 13.5 12.6 6.9 14.8 12.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s5.5 18.0 18.0 5.0 18.5 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s4.5 5.8 4.0 3.2 6.5 4.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.3 0.8 0.0 2.9 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.2
HCM 6th LOS B
165
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Midday
4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh22.7
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 59 306 136 33 266 35 118 73 18 52 63 80 Future Vol, veh/h 59 306 136 33 266 35 118 73 18 52 63 80 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 64 333 148 36 289 38 128 79 20 57 68 87
Number of Lanes 0 11110011010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay 26.7 22.8 17.7 17.7

HCM LOS D C C C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 62% 0% 16% 0% 100% 1% 27%
Vol Thru, % 38% 0% 84% 0% 0% 87% 32%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 12% 41%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 191 18 365 136 30 304 195
LT Vol 118 0 59 0 30 3 52
Through Vol 73 0 306 0 0 266 63
RT Vol 0 18 0 136 0 35 80
Lane Flow Rate 208 20 397 148 32 331 212
Geometry Grp 7777776
Degree of Util (X) 0.477 0.039 0.793 0.263 0.071 0.671 0.465 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.27 7.231 7.199 6.397 7.894 7.302 7.893 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 434 492 500 559 452 493 454
Service Time 6.056 5.016 4.977 4.174 5.676 5.084 5.985
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.479 0.041 0.794 0.265 0.071 0.671 0.467 HCM Control Delay 18.4 10.3 32.4 11.5 11.3 23.9 17.7
HCM Lane LOS C B D B B C C
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.5 0.1 7.3 1 0.2 4.9 2.4
166
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Midday
5: Capitola Ave & Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Future Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000010000
Mvmt Flow 138 55 26 3 41 17 26 97 7 23 86 74
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 9.7 8.2 8.9 8.9

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 20% 63% 5% 13%
Vol Thru, % 74% 25% 67% 47%
Vol Right, % 6% 12% 28% 40%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 124 208 58 174
LT Vol 25 131 3 22
Through Vol 92 52 39 82
RT Vol 7 25 16 70
Lane Flow Rate 131 219 61 183
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.174 0.289 0.081 0.23
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.8 4.757 4.753 4.524
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 744 753 749 791
Service Time 2.849 2.803 2.81 2.568
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.176 0.291 0.081 0.231
HCM Control Delay 8.9 9.7 8.2 8.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 1.2 0.3 0.9
167
Item 9 B.
168
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing PM
1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 92 2 236 291 374 0 0 648 287 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 92 2 236 291 374 0 0 648 287 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1885 1885 1900 0 0 1885 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 96 2 246 303 390 0 0 675 299
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 001100010
Cap, veh/h 333 2 295 633 2416 0 0 570 252
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.70 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 13 1599 1795 3705 0 0 2468 1051
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 96 0 248 303 390 0 0 509 465
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 0 1612 1795 1805 0 0 1791 1634 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.0 8.9 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 0.0 8.9 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.64
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 333 0 297 633 2416 0 0 430 392
V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.00 0.84 0.48 0.16 0.00 0.00 1.18 1.18 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 386 0 344 633 2416 0 0 430 392
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.1 0.0 23.6 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 22.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 12.8 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 104.6 106.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.1 0.0 4.1 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.1 16.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.3 0.0 36.3 6.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 127.4 129.0 LnGrp LOS C A D AAAAFF
Approach Vol, veh/h 344 693 974
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.1 2.9 128.2
Approach LOS C A F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.7 19.0 15.3 44.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.6 * 4.2 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.3 * 14 * 13 38.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.5 16.4 10.9 2.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 68.6
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 169
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing PM
2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 185 155 325 0 0 0 0 465 132 317 454 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 185 155 325 0 0 0 0 465 132 317 454 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1885 0 1885 1900 1885 1900 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 192 268 269 0 511 145 348 499 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 1 010100
Cap, veh/h 360 378 318 0 792 223 516 2362 0
Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.22 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1900 1598 0 2825 770 1795 3705 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 192 268 269 0 334 322 348 499 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1900 1598 0 1791 1709 1795 1805 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 7.9 9.7 0.0 9.8 9.9 11.2 6.8 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 7.9 9.7 0.0 9.8 9.9 11.2 6.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.45 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 360 378 318 0 519 496 516 2362 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.71 0.85 0.00 0.64 0.65 0.67 0.21 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 386 405 341 0 519 496 516 2362 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.98 0.98 0.53 0.53 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.5 22.4 23.1 0.0 18.6 18.6 24.4 10.8 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 4.2 15.5 0.0 5.9 6.3 1.5 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.2 3.6 4.7 0.0 4.6 4.5 5.5 2.6 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.0 26.6 38.7 0.0 24.5 25.0 25.9 10.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C D A C C C B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 729 656 847
Approach Delay, s/veh 29.9 24.7 17.1
Approach LOS C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 43.9 21.9 22.0 16.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 * 4.6 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.4 14.3 * 17 12.8
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.8 13.2 11.9 11.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 0.0 1.0 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.5
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 170
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing PM
3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 89 44 79 23 45 86 89 290 14 154 438 52 Future Volume (veh/h) 89 44 79 23 45 86 89 290 14 154 438 52 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.96 0.98 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 91 45 81 23 46 88 91 296 14 157 447 53 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 00000000002
Cap, veh/h 375 150 334 155 126 197 156 881 41 211 915 108 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.09 0.25 0.25 0.12 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 879 697 1546 130 586 912 1810 3501 165 1810 3241 382 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 136 0 81 157 0 0 91 152 158 157 248 252 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1576 0 1546 1628 0 0 1810 1805 1861 1810 1805 1819 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 2.2 2.3 2.7 3.7 3.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.0 0.0 1.4 2.6 0.0 0.0 1.6 2.2 2.3 2.7 3.7 3.8 Prop In Lane 0.67 1.00 0.15 0.56 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.21
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 525 0 334 478 0 0 156 454 468 211 509 513 V/C Ratio(X) 0.26 0.00 0.24 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.33 0.34 0.74 0.49 0.49 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1004 0 857 1014 0 0 279 1001 1032 307 1028 1036 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.8 0.0 10.5 11.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 9.9 9.9 13.9 9.7 9.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.4 0.4 5.6 0.7 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.7 0.0 0.4 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.2 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.0 0.0 10.9 11.4 0.0 0.0 17.7 10.4 10.4 19.4 10.4 10.4 LnGrp LOS B ABBAABBBBBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 217 157 401 657
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.0 11.4 12.0 12.6
Approach LOS BBBB
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.3 12.7 11.5 7.3 13.7 11.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s5.5 18.0 18.0 5.0 18.5 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s4.7 4.3 4.0 3.6 5.8 4.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.9 0.0 2.6 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.1
HCM 6th LOS B
171
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing PM
4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh15.9
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 72 281 125 23 242 24 100 78 25 41 48 62 Future Vol, veh/h 72 281 125 23 242 24 100 78 25 41 48 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 11111111111
Mvmt Flow 73 287 128 23 247 24 102 80 26 42 49 63
Number of Lanes 0 11110011010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay 17.8 15.5 14 13.3

HCM LOS C C B B

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 56% 0% 20% 0% 100% 1% 27%
Vol Thru, % 44% 0% 80% 0% 0% 90% 32%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 9% 41%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 178 25 353 125 21 268 151
LT Vol 100 0 72 0 21 2 41
Through Vol 78 0 281 0 0 242 48
RT Vol 0 25 0 125 0 24 62
Lane Flow Rate 182 26 360 128 21 274 154
Geometry Grp 7777776
Degree of Util (X) 0.376 0.046 0.651 0.202 0.042 0.504 0.306 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.448 6.446 6.51 5.693 7.193 6.623 7.152 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 483 555 558 633 500 548 502
Service Time 5.194 4.191 4.221 3.404 4.907 4.337 5.201
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.377 0.047 0.645 0.202 0.042 0.5 0.307 HCM Control Delay 14.6 9.5 20.6 9.8 10.2 15.9 13.3
HCM Lane LOS B A C A B C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.7 0.1 4.7 0.8 0.1 2.8 1.3
172
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing PM
5: Capitola Ave & Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:05 am 11/28/2022 Signal Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Future Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000010000
Mvmt Flow 138 55 26 3 41 17 26 97 7 23 86 74
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 9.7 8.2 8.9 8.9

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 20% 63% 5% 13%
Vol Thru, % 74% 25% 67% 47%
Vol Right, % 6% 12% 28% 40%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 124 208 58 174
LT Vol 25 131 3 22
Through Vol 92 52 39 82
RT Vol 7 25 16 70
Lane Flow Rate 131 219 61 183
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.174 0.289 0.081 0.23
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.8 4.757 4.753 4.524
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 744 753 749 791
Service Time 2.849 2.803 2.81 2.568
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.176 0.291 0.081 0.231
HCM Control Delay 8.9 9.7 8.2 8.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 1.2 0.3 0.9
173
Item 9 B.
174
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing AM
1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 69 3 139 390 538 0 0 407 474 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 69 3 139 390 538 0 0 407 474 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1900 1885 1885 1856 0 0 1870 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 73 3 146 411 566 0 0 428 499
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 501130021
Cap, veh/h 214 4 195 742 2574 0 0 426 353
Arrive On Green 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.41 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1739 33 1583 1795 3618 0 0 1870 1469
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 73 0 149 411 566 0 0 428 499
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1739 0 1615 1795 1763 0 0 1777 1469 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 0.0 5.3 10.4 3.1 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 0.0 5.3 10.4 3.1 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 214 0 199 742 2574 0 0 426 353
V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.00 0.75 0.55 0.22 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 371 0 345 742 2574 0 0 426 353
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.1 0.0 25.4 13.4 2.6 0.0 0.0 22.8 22.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 2.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 44.5 202.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 2.0 3.9 0.7 0.0 0.0 10.9 24.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.4 0.0 27.5 13.7 2.7 0.0 0.0 67.3 225.6 LnGrp LOS C A C BAAAFF
Approach Vol, veh/h 222 977 927
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.5 7.4 152.5
Approach LOS C A F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.4 19.0 11.6 48.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.6 * 4.2 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.3 * 14 * 13 38.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.4 16.4 7.3 5.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 72.7
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 175
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing AM
2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 317 0 263 0 0 0 0 604 125 188 308 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 317 0 263 0 0 0 0 604 125 188 308 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1900 1856 0 1885 1856 1870 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 420 0 185 0 636 132 198 324 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 0 3 013230
Cap, veh/h 542 0 245 0 852 176 589 2459 0
Arrive On Green 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.11 0.23 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3478 0 1572 0 3031 608 1781 3618 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 420 0 185 0 387 381 198 324 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1739 0 1572 0 1791 1754 1781 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 11.8 11.8 6.2 4.4 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 11.8 11.8 6.2 4.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.35 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 542 0 245 0 519 509 589 2459 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.34 0.13 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 742 0 335 0 519 509 589 2459 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.3 0.0 24.2 0.0 19.3 19.3 20.6 8.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.3 0.0 3.8 0.0 9.4 9.7 0.1 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.8 0.0 2.6 0.0 5.9 5.8 2.6 1.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.6 0.0 28.1 0.0 28.7 29.0 20.7 8.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A C A C C C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 605 768 522
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.0 28.9 13.3
Approach LOS C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.5 24.5 22.0 13.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 * 4.6 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.4 14.3 * 17 12.8
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 8.2 13.8 9.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.0
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 176
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Roundabout Existing AM
3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.6
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1111
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1111
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 111 203 526 505
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 114 206 532 517
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 491 578 178 120
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 146 132 427 664
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 14 7 7 3
Ped Cap Adj 0.998 0.999 0.999 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.8 7.9 8.2 7.3
Approach LOS AAAA
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
Entry Flow, veh/h 114 206 532 517
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 836 765 1151 1221
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.974 0.984 0.988 0.976
Flow Entry, veh/h 111 203 526 505
Cap Entry, veh/h 813 752 1136 1192
V/C Ratio 0.137 0.269 0.463 0.424
Control Delay, s/veh 5.8 7.9 8.2 7.3

LOS A A A A
95th %tile Queue, veh 0 1 3 2
177
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing AM
4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh22.7
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 56 201 81 45 318 27 63 55 13 78 68 62 Future Vol, veh/h 56 201 81 45 318 27 63 55 13 78 68 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 67 242 98 54 383 33 76 66 16 94 82 75
Number of Lanes 0 11110011010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay 18.7 30.8 14.6 19.2

HCM LOS C D B C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 53% 0% 22% 0% 100% 1% 38%
Vol Thru, % 47% 0% 78% 0% 0% 91% 33%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 8% 30%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 118 13 257 81 41 350 208
LT Vol 63 0 56 0 41 5 78
Through Vol 55 0 201 0 0 318 68
RT Vol 0 13 0 81 0 27 62
Lane Flow Rate 142 16 310 98 49 421 251
Geometry Grp 7777776
Degree of Util (X) 0.327 0.032 0.623 0.174 0.101 0.81 0.532 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.281 7.284 7.238 6.407 7.484 6.923 7.642 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 432 489 499 557 478 522 471
Service Time 6.064 5.066 5.008 4.177 5.249 4.688 5.719
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.329 0.033 0.621 0.176 0.103 0.807 0.533 HCM Control Delay 15.1 10.3 21.3 10.5 11.1 33.1 19.2
HCM Lane LOS C B C B B D C
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.4 0.1 4.2 0.6 0.3 7.8 3.1
178
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing AM
5: Capitola Ave & Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 10
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 50 22 13 6 60 34 10 89 1 16 155 104
Future Vol, veh/h 50 22 13 6 60 34 10 89 1 16 155 104
Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 47000030022
Mvmt Flow 64 28 17 8 77 44 13 114 1 21 199 133
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 9.3 9.1 9 10.9

HCM LOS A A A B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 10% 59% 6% 6%
Vol Thru, % 89% 26% 60% 56%
Vol Right, % 1% 15% 34% 38%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 100 85 100 275
LT Vol 10 50 6 16
Through Vol 89 22 60 155
RT Vol 1 13 34 104
Lane Flow Rate 128 109 128 353
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.175 0.157 0.176 0.435
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.917 5.196 4.955 4.441
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 724 684 717 807
Service Time 2.985 3.275 3.033 2.492
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.177 0.159 0.179 0.437
HCM Control Delay 9 9.3 9.1 10.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAB
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.2
179
Item 9 B.
180
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Midday 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 125 3 225 343 449 0 0 671 353 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 125 3 225 343 449 0 0 671 353 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 0 0 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 130 3 234 357 468 0 0 699 368
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 111110011
Cap, veh/h 310 3 273 615 2560 0 0 699 368
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.34 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 20 1580 1795 3676 0 0 2330 1176
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 130 0 237 357 468 0 0 560 507
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 0 1601 1795 1791 0 0 1791 1621 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.0 0.0 11.2 12.7 3.3 0.0 0.0 24.4 24.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.0 0.0 11.2 12.7 3.3 0.0 0.0 24.4 24.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.73
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 310 0 276 615 2560 0 0 560 507
V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.00 0.86 0.58 0.18 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 364 0 324 615 2560 0 0 560 507
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.8 0.0 31.3 21.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 26.8 26.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 15.9 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 37.8 40.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 5.3 5.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 15.8 14.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.1 0.0 47.2 21.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 64.6 66.9 LnGrp LOS C A D C AAAEF
Approach Vol, veh/h 367 825 1067
Approach Delay, s/veh 40.8 11.6 65.7
Approach LOS D B E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 31.3 29.0 17.7 60.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.6 * 4.2 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.3 * 24 * 16 53.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.7 26.4 13.2 5.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.3 1.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 41.9
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 181
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Midday 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 204 97 291 0 0 0 0 555 127 290 498 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 204 97 291 0 0 0 0 555 127 290 498 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1885 0 1885 1885 1885 1885 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 183 240 230 0 603 138 315 541 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 011110
Cap, veh/h 313 329 279 0 865 197 635 2553 0
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.47 0.95 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1885 1598 0 2978 658 1795 3676 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 183 240 230 0 374 367 315 541 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1795 1885 1598 0 1791 1751 1795 1791 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.3 9.4 10.8 0.0 14.4 14.5 9.5 0.8 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.3 9.4 10.8 0.0 14.4 14.5 9.5 0.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.38 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 313 329 279 0 537 525 635 2553 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.58 0.73 0.83 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.50 0.21 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 479 503 426 0 537 525 635 2553 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.56 0.56 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.6 30.5 31.1 0.0 24.2 24.2 15.8 0.6 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 1.2 4.4 0.0 7.3 7.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln3.1 4.2 4.3 0.0 7.0 6.9 3.4 0.2 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.2 31.6 35.5 0.0 31.4 31.7 16.0 0.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C D A C C B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 653 741 856
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.6 31.6 6.3
Approach LOS C C A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 60.2 32.2 28.0 17.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 * 4.6 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 48.4 18.3 * 23 20.8
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.8 11.5 16.5 12.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.6 0.1 1.3 0.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.3
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 182
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Roundabout Existing Midday
3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.5
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1111
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1111
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 209 161 540 706
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 211 162 545 713
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 670 603 273 113
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 156 215 608 652
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 9 10 24 8
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.997 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.0 7.3 9.9 9.9
Approach LOS AAAA
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
Entry Flow, veh/h 211 162 545 713
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 697 746 1045 1230
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.988 0.992 0.990 0.990
Flow Entry, veh/h 209 161 540 706
Cap Entry, veh/h 688 739 1031 1216
V/C Ratio 0.303 0.217 0.523 0.580
Control Delay, s/veh 9.0 7.3 9.9 9.9

LOS A A A A
95th %tile Queue, veh 1 1 3 4
183
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Midday
4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh22.7
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 59 306 136 33 266 35 118 73 18 52 63 80 Future Vol, veh/h 59 306 136 33 266 35 118 73 18 52 63 80 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 64 333 148 36 289 38 128 79 20 57 68 87
Number of Lanes 0 11110011010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay 26.7 22.8 17.7 17.7

HCM LOS D C C C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 62% 0% 16% 0% 100% 1% 27%
Vol Thru, % 38% 0% 84% 0% 0% 87% 32%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 12% 41%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 191 18 365 136 30 304 195
LT Vol 118 0 59 0 30 3 52
Through Vol 73 0 306 0 0 266 63
RT Vol 0 18 0 136 0 35 80
Lane Flow Rate 208 20 397 148 32 331 212
Geometry Grp 7777776
Degree of Util (X) 0.477 0.039 0.793 0.263 0.071 0.671 0.465 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.27 7.231 7.199 6.397 7.894 7.302 7.893 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 434 492 500 559 452 493 454
Service Time 6.056 5.016 4.977 4.174 5.676 5.084 5.985
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.479 0.041 0.794 0.265 0.071 0.671 0.467 HCM Control Delay 18.4 10.3 32.4 11.5 11.3 23.9 17.7
HCM Lane LOS C B D B B C C
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.5 0.1 7.3 1 0.2 4.9 2.4
184
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Midday
5: Capitola Ave & Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Future Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000010000
Mvmt Flow 138 55 26 3 41 17 26 97 7 23 86 74
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 9.7 8.2 8.9 8.9

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 20% 63% 5% 13%
Vol Thru, % 74% 25% 67% 47%
Vol Right, % 6% 12% 28% 40%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 124 208 58 174
LT Vol 25 131 3 22
Through Vol 92 52 39 82
RT Vol 7 25 16 70
Lane Flow Rate 131 219 61 183
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.174 0.289 0.081 0.23
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.8 4.757 4.753 4.524
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 744 753 749 791
Service Time 2.849 2.803 2.81 2.568
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.176 0.291 0.081 0.231
HCM Control Delay 8.9 9.7 8.2 8.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 1.2 0.3 0.9
185
Item 9 B.
186
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing PM
1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 92 2 236 291 374 0 0 648 287 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 92 2 236 291 374 0 0 648 287 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1885 1885 1900 0 0 1885 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 96 2 246 303 390 0 0 675 299
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 001100010
Cap, veh/h 322 2 284 606 2561 0 0 744 330
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.34 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 13 1599 1795 3705 0 0 2473 1054
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 96 0 248 303 390 0 0 508 466
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 0 1612 1795 1805 0 0 1791 1642 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 0.0 11.7 10.5 2.7 0.0 0.0 21.2 21.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 0.0 11.7 10.5 2.7 0.0 0.0 21.2 21.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.64
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 322 0 287 606 2561 0 0 560 514
V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.00 0.87 0.50 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.91 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 367 0 327 606 2561 0 0 560 514
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.8 0.0 31.2 20.6 3.7 0.0 0.0 25.7 25.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 17.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 20.9 22.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 0.0 5.7 4.3 0.8 0.0 0.0 11.9 11.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.0 0.0 48.7 20.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 46.6 48.0 LnGrp LOS C A D C A A A D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 344 693 974
Approach Delay, s/veh 42.9 11.2 47.3
Approach LOS D B D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.9 29.0 18.1 59.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.6 * 4.2 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.3 * 24 * 16 53.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.5 23.2 13.7 4.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.5 0.2 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.1
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 187
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing PM
2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 185 155 325 0 0 0 0 465 132 317 454 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 185 155 325 0 0 0 0 465 132 317 454 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1885 0 1885 1900 1885 1900 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 192 268 269 0 511 145 348 499 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 1 010100
Cap, veh/h 358 376 316 0 819 231 593 2488 0
Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.44 0.92 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1900 1598 0 2825 770 1795 3705 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 192 268 269 0 334 322 348 499 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1900 1598 0 1791 1710 1795 1805 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.4 10.3 12.7 0.0 12.5 12.7 11.4 1.1 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.4 10.3 12.7 0.0 12.5 12.7 11.4 1.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.45 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 358 376 316 0 537 513 593 2488 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.71 0.85 0.00 0.62 0.63 0.59 0.20 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 483 507 426 0 537 513 593 2488 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.70 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.1 29.2 30.2 0.0 23.5 23.5 17.9 1.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 1.6 9.2 0.0 5.3 5.7 0.7 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln3.1 4.6 5.4 0.0 5.9 5.8 4.2 0.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.5 30.8 39.3 0.0 28.8 29.3 18.6 1.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C D A C C B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 729 656 847
Approach Delay, s/veh 33.3 29.0 8.3
Approach LOS C C A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 58.4 30.4 28.0 19.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 * 4.6 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 48.4 18.3 * 23 20.8
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 13.4 14.7 14.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.5 0.1 1.3 0.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.6
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 188
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Roundabout Existing PM
3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.6
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1111
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1111
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 217 157 401 657
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 217 157 401 658
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 627 478 293 160
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 191 216 551 475
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 8 10 17 17
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.998 0.998
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.5 6.1 7.8 9.8
Approach LOS AAAA
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
Entry Flow, veh/h 217 157 401 658
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 728 847 1023 1172
Entry HV Adj Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.998
Flow Entry, veh/h 217 157 401 657
Cap Entry, veh/h 727 846 1021 1168
V/C Ratio 0.298 0.186 0.393 0.563
Control Delay, s/veh 8.5 6.1 7.8 9.8

LOS A A A A
95th %tile Queue, veh 1 1 2 4
189
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing PM
4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh15.9
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 72 281 125 23 242 24 100 78 25 41 48 62 Future Vol, veh/h 72 281 125 23 242 24 100 78 25 41 48 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 11111111111
Mvmt Flow 73 287 128 23 247 24 102 80 26 42 49 63
Number of Lanes 0 11110011010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay 17.8 15.5 14 13.3

HCM LOS C C B B

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 56% 0% 20% 0% 100% 1% 27%
Vol Thru, % 44% 0% 80% 0% 0% 90% 32%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 9% 41%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 178 25 353 125 21 268 151
LT Vol 100 0 72 0 21 2 41
Through Vol 78 0 281 0 0 242 48
RT Vol 0 25 0 125 0 24 62
Lane Flow Rate 182 26 360 128 21 274 154
Geometry Grp 7777776
Degree of Util (X) 0.376 0.046 0.651 0.202 0.042 0.504 0.306 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.448 6.446 6.51 5.693 7.193 6.623 7.152 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 483 555 558 633 500 548 502
Service Time 5.194 4.191 4.221 3.404 4.907 4.337 5.201
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.377 0.047 0.645 0.202 0.042 0.5 0.307 HCM Control Delay 14.6 9.5 20.6 9.8 10.2 15.9 13.3
HCM Lane LOS B A C A B C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.7 0.1 4.7 0.8 0.1 2.8 1.3
190
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing PM
5: Capitola Ave & Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:00 am 11/28/2022 Roundabout Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Future Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000010000
Mvmt Flow 138 55 26 3 41 17 26 97 7 23 86 74
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 9.7 8.2 8.9 8.9

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 20% 63% 5% 13%
Vol Thru, % 74% 25% 67% 47%
Vol Right, % 6% 12% 28% 40%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 124 208 58 174
LT Vol 25 131 3 22
Through Vol 92 52 39 82
RT Vol 7 25 16 70
Lane Flow Rate 131 219 61 183
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.174 0.289 0.081 0.23
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.8 4.757 4.753 4.524
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 744 753 749 791
Service Time 2.849 2.803 2.81 2.568
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.176 0.291 0.081 0.231
HCM Control Delay 8.9 9.7 8.2 8.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 1.2 0.3 0.9
191
Item 9 B.
192
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing AM
1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp 11/29/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 69 3 139 390 538 0 0 407 474 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 69 3 139 390 538 0 0 407 474 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1900 1885 1885 1856 0 0 1870 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 73 3 146 411 566 0 0 428 499
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 501130021
Cap, veh/h 214 4 195 742 2574 0 0 426 353
Arrive On Green 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.41 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1739 33 1583 1795 3618 0 0 1870 1469
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 73 0 149 411 566 0 0 428 499
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1739 0 1615 1795 1763 0 0 1777 1469 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 0.0 5.3 10.4 3.1 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 0.0 5.3 10.4 3.1 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 214 0 199 742 2574 0 0 426 353
V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.00 0.75 0.55 0.22 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 371 0 345 742 2574 0 0 426 353
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.1 0.0 25.4 13.4 2.6 0.0 0.0 22.8 22.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 2.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 44.5 202.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 2.0 3.9 0.7 0.0 0.0 10.9 24.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.4 0.0 27.5 13.7 2.7 0.0 0.0 67.3 225.6 LnGrp LOS C A C BAAAFF
Approach Vol, veh/h 222 977 927
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.5 7.4 152.5
Approach LOS C A F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.4 19.0 11.6 48.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.6 * 4.2 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.3 * 14 * 13 38.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.4 16.4 7.3 5.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 72.7
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 193
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing AM
2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp 11/29/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 317 0 263 0 0 0 0 604 125 188 308 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 317 0 263 0 0 0 0 604 125 188 308 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1900 1856 0 1885 1856 1870 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 420 0 185 0 636 132 198 324 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 0 3 013230
Cap, veh/h 542 0 245 0 852 176 589 2459 0
Arrive On Green 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.11 0.23 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3478 0 1572 0 3031 608 1781 3618 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 420 0 185 0 387 381 198 324 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1739 0 1572 0 1791 1754 1781 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 11.8 11.8 6.2 4.4 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 11.8 11.8 6.2 4.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.35 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 542 0 245 0 519 509 589 2459 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.34 0.13 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 742 0 335 0 519 509 589 2459 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.3 0.0 24.2 0.0 19.3 19.3 20.6 8.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.3 0.0 3.8 0.0 9.4 9.7 0.1 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.8 0.0 2.6 0.0 5.9 5.8 2.6 1.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.6 0.0 28.1 0.0 28.7 29.0 20.7 8.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A C A C C C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 605 768 522
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.0 28.9 13.3
Approach LOS C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.5 24.5 22.0 13.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 * 4.6 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.4 14.3 * 17 12.8
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 8.2 13.8 9.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.0
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 194
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing AM
3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St 11/29/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh24.8
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 51 17 30 7 38 134 59 392 12 86 329 29 Future Vol, veh/h 51 17 30 7 38 134 59 392 12 86 329 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 00031219033
Mvmt Flow 58 19 34 8 43 152 67 445 14 98 374 33
Number of Lanes 0 11010110110
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 1 2
HCM Control Delay 12.4 15.4 31.9 23.8

HCM LOS B C D C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 75% 0% 4% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 97% 25% 0% 21% 0% 92%
Vol Right, % 0% 3% 0% 100% 75% 0% 8%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 59 404 68 30 179 86 358
LT Vol 59 0 51 0 7 86 0
Through Vol 0 392 17 0 38 0 329
RT Vol 0 12 0 30 134 0 29
Lane Flow Rate 67 459 77 34 203 98 407
Geometry Grp 7777677
Degree of Util (X) 0.133 0.84 0.183 0.069 0.413 0.194 0.749 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.138 6.589 8.545 7.331 7.302 7.147 6.63 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 502 551 420 487 492 502 545
Service Time 4.882 4.333 6.305 5.09 5.35 4.892 4.375
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.133 0.833 0.183 0.07 0.413 0.195 0.747 HCM Control Delay 11 35 13.2 10.6 15.4 11.6 26.7
HCM Lane LOS B D B B C B D
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 8.7 0.7 0.2 2 0.7 6.5
195
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing AM
4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave 11/29/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh22.7
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 56 201 81 45 318 27 63 55 13 78 68 62 Future Vol, veh/h 56 201 81 45 318 27 63 55 13 78 68 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 67 242 98 54 383 33 76 66 16 94 82 75
Number of Lanes 0 11110011010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay 18.7 30.8 14.6 19.2

HCM LOS C D B C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 53% 0% 22% 0% 100% 1% 38%
Vol Thru, % 47% 0% 78% 0% 0% 91% 33%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 8% 30%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 118 13 257 81 41 350 208
LT Vol 63 0 56 0 41 5 78
Through Vol 55 0 201 0 0 318 68
RT Vol 0 13 0 81 0 27 62
Lane Flow Rate 142 16 310 98 49 421 251
Geometry Grp 7777776
Degree of Util (X) 0.327 0.032 0.623 0.174 0.101 0.81 0.532 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.281 7.284 7.238 6.407 7.484 6.923 7.642 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 432 489 499 557 478 522 471
Service Time 6.064 5.066 5.008 4.177 5.249 4.688 5.719
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.329 0.033 0.621 0.176 0.103 0.807 0.533 HCM Control Delay 15.1 10.3 21.3 10.5 11.1 33.1 19.2
HCM Lane LOS C B C B B D C
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.4 0.1 4.2 0.6 0.3 7.8 3.1
196
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing AM
5: Capitola Ave & Hill St 11/29/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 10
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 50 22 13 6 60 34 10 89 1 16 155 104
Future Vol, veh/h 50 22 13 6 60 34 10 89 1 16 155 104
Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 47000030022
Mvmt Flow 64 28 17 8 77 44 13 114 1 21 199 133
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 9.3 9.1 9 10.9

HCM LOS A A A B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 10% 59% 6% 6%
Vol Thru, % 89% 26% 60% 56%
Vol Right, % 1% 15% 34% 38%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 100 85 100 275
LT Vol 10 50 6 16
Through Vol 89 22 60 155
RT Vol 1 13 34 104
Lane Flow Rate 128 109 128 353
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.175 0.157 0.176 0.435
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.917 5.196 4.955 4.441
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 724 684 717 807
Service Time 2.985 3.275 3.033 2.492
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.177 0.159 0.179 0.437
HCM Control Delay 9 9.3 9.1 10.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAB
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.2
197
Item 9 B.
198
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Midday 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp 11/29/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 125 3 225 343 449 0 0 671 353 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 125 3 225 343 449 0 0 671 353 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 0 0 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 130 3 234 357 468 0 0 699 368
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 111110011
Cap, veh/h 322 4 283 642 2414 0 0 534 281
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.36 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 20 1580 1795 3676 0 0 2320 1170
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 130 0 237 357 468 0 0 562 505
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 0 1601 1795 1791 0 0 1791 1605 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.8 0.0 8.6 9.6 2.9 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.8 0.0 8.6 9.6 2.9 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.73
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 322 0 287 642 2414 0 0 430 385
V/C Ratio(X) 0.40 0.00 0.83 0.56 0.19 0.00 0.00 1.31 1.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 383 0 341 642 2414 0 0 430 385
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.8 0.0 23.7 15.5 3.7 0.0 0.0 22.8 22.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 11.4 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 154.7 157.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 0.0 3.8 3.7 0.8 0.0 0.0 24.1 21.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.1 0.0 35.1 15.9 3.8 0.0 0.0 177.5 179.9 LnGrp LOS C A D BAAAFF
Approach Vol, veh/h 367 825 1067
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.5 9.0 178.6
Approach LOS C A F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.0 19.0 15.0 45.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.6 * 4.2 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.3 * 14 * 13 38.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.6 16.4 10.6 4.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 92.6
HCM 6th LOS F
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 199
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Midday 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp 11/29/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 204 97 291 0 0 0 0 555 127 290 498 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 204 97 291 0 0 0 0 555 127 290 498 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1885 0 1885 1885 1885 1885 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 183 240 230 0 603 138 315 541 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 011110
Cap, veh/h 319 335 284 0 836 191 554 2419 0
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.10 0.22 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1885 1598 0 2977 658 1795 3676 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 183 240 230 0 374 367 315 541 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1795 1885 1598 0 1791 1750 1795 1791 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.6 7.2 8.3 0.0 11.2 11.3 10.0 7.4 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.6 7.2 8.3 0.0 11.2 11.3 10.0 7.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.38 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 319 335 284 0 519 508 554 2419 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 0.72 0.81 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.57 0.22 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 383 402 341 0 519 508 554 2419 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.6 23.2 23.7 0.0 19.1 19.1 23.1 10.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 3.4 9.7 0.0 8.4 8.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.2 3.2 3.6 0.0 5.5 5.5 4.7 2.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.2 26.6 33.4 0.0 27.5 27.8 23.4 10.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C A C C C B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 653 741 856
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.0 27.6 15.3
Approach LOS C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 45.1 23.1 22.0 14.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 * 4.6 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.4 14.3 * 17 12.8
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.4 12.0 13.3 10.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.6 0.1 0.9 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.0
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 200
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Midday
3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St 11/29/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh55.3
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 75 45 68 15 25 104 60 402 23 124 458 53 Future Vol, veh/h 75 45 68 15 25 104 60 402 23 124 458 53 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 11111111111
Mvmt Flow 83 50 76 17 28 116 67 447 26 138 509 59
Number of Lanes 0 11010110110
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 1 2
HCM Control Delay 14.6 16.3 47.9 81.9

HCM LOS B C E F

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 62% 0% 10% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 95% 38% 0% 17% 0% 90%
Vol Right, % 0% 5% 0% 100% 72% 0% 10%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 60 425 120 68 144 124 511
LT Vol 60 0 75 0 15 124 0
Through Vol 0 402 45 0 25 0 458
RT Vol 0 23 0 68 104 0 53
Lane Flow Rate 67 472 133 76 160 138 568
Geometry Grp 7777677
Degree of Util (X) 0.142 0.935 0.321 0.16 0.363 0.292 1.109 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.917 7.364 9.006 7.955 8.519 7.617 7.029 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 456 496 401 453 426 473 517
Service Time 5.617 5.064 6.706 5.655 6.519 5.356 4.768
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.147 0.952 0.332 0.168 0.376 0.292 1.099 HCM Control Delay 11.9 53 15.9 12.2 16.3 13.5 98.5
HCM Lane LOS B F C B C B F
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 11.3 1.4 0.6 1.6 1.2 18.4
201
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Midday
4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave 11/29/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh22.7
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 59 306 136 33 266 35 118 73 18 52 63 80 Future Vol, veh/h 59 306 136 33 266 35 118 73 18 52 63 80 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 64 333 148 36 289 38 128 79 20 57 68 87
Number of Lanes 0 11110011010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay 26.7 22.8 17.7 17.7

HCM LOS D C C C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 62% 0% 16% 0% 100% 1% 27%
Vol Thru, % 38% 0% 84% 0% 0% 87% 32%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 12% 41%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 191 18 365 136 30 304 195
LT Vol 118 0 59 0 30 3 52
Through Vol 73 0 306 0 0 266 63
RT Vol 0 18 0 136 0 35 80
Lane Flow Rate 208 20 397 148 32 331 212
Geometry Grp 7777776
Degree of Util (X) 0.477 0.039 0.793 0.263 0.071 0.671 0.465 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.27 7.231 7.199 6.397 7.894 7.302 7.893 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 434 492 500 559 452 493 454
Service Time 6.056 5.016 4.977 4.174 5.676 5.084 5.985
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.479 0.041 0.794 0.265 0.071 0.671 0.467 HCM Control Delay 18.4 10.3 32.4 11.5 11.3 23.9 17.7
HCM Lane LOS C B D B B C C
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.5 0.1 7.3 1 0.2 4.9 2.4
202
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Midday
5: Capitola Ave & Hill St 11/29/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Future Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000010000
Mvmt Flow 138 55 26 3 41 17 26 97 7 23 86 74
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 9.7 8.2 8.9 8.9

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 20% 63% 5% 13%
Vol Thru, % 74% 25% 67% 47%
Vol Right, % 6% 12% 28% 40%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 124 208 58 174
LT Vol 25 131 3 22
Through Vol 92 52 39 82
RT Vol 7 25 16 70
Lane Flow Rate 131 219 61 183
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.174 0.289 0.081 0.23
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.8 4.757 4.753 4.524
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 744 753 749 791
Service Time 2.849 2.803 2.81 2.568
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.176 0.291 0.081 0.231
HCM Control Delay 8.9 9.7 8.2 8.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 1.2 0.3 0.9
203
Item 9 B.
204
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing PM
1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp 11/29/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 92 2 236 291 374 0 0 648 287 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 92 2 236 291 374 0 0 648 287 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1885 1885 1900 0 0 1885 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 96 2 246 303 390 0 0 675 299
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 001100010
Cap, veh/h 333 2 295 633 2416 0 0 570 252
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.35 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 13 1599 1795 3705 0 0 2468 1051
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 96 0 248 303 390 0 0 509 465
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 0 1612 1795 1805 0 0 1791 1634 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.0 8.9 7.9 2.4 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 0.0 8.9 7.9 2.4 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.64
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 333 0 297 633 2416 0 0 430 392
V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.00 0.84 0.48 0.16 0.00 0.00 1.18 1.18 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 386 0 344 633 2416 0 0 430 392
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.1 0.0 23.6 15.1 3.7 0.0 0.0 22.8 22.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 12.8 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 104.6 106.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.1 0.0 4.1 3.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 18.1 16.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.3 0.0 36.3 15.3 3.8 0.0 0.0 127.4 129.0 LnGrp LOS C A D BAAAFF
Approach Vol, veh/h 344 693 974
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.1 8.8 128.2
Approach LOS C A F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.7 19.0 15.3 44.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.6 * 4.2 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.3 * 14 * 13 38.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.9 16.4 10.9 4.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 70.6
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 205
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing PM
2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp 11/29/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 185 155 325 0 0 0 0 465 132 317 454 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 185 155 325 0 0 0 0 465 132 317 454 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1885 0 1885 1900 1885 1900 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 192 268 269 0 511 145 348 499 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 1 010100
Cap, veh/h 360 378 318 0 792 223 516 2362 0
Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.22 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1900 1598 0 2825 770 1795 3705 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 192 268 269 0 334 322 348 499 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1900 1598 0 1791 1709 1795 1805 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 7.9 9.7 0.0 9.8 9.9 11.2 6.8 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 7.9 9.7 0.0 9.8 9.9 11.2 6.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.45 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 360 378 318 0 519 496 516 2362 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.71 0.85 0.00 0.64 0.65 0.67 0.21 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 386 405 341 0 519 496 516 2362 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.53 0.53 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.5 22.4 23.1 0.0 18.6 18.6 24.4 10.8 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 4.2 15.5 0.0 6.0 6.5 1.5 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.2 3.6 4.7 0.0 4.6 4.5 5.5 2.6 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.0 26.6 38.7 0.0 24.6 25.1 25.9 10.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C D A C C C B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 729 656 847
Approach Delay, s/veh 29.9 24.8 17.1
Approach LOS C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 43.9 21.9 22.0 16.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 * 4.6 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.4 14.3 * 17 12.8
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.8 13.2 11.9 11.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 0.0 1.0 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.5
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 206
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing PM
3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St 11/29/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh26.8
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 89 44 79 23 45 86 89 290 14 154 438 52 Future Vol, veh/h 89 44 79 23 45 86 89 290 14 154 438 52 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000000002
Mvmt Flow 91 45 81 23 46 88 91 296 14 157 447 53
Number of Lanes 0 11010110110
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 1 2
HCM Control Delay 13.5 14.8 18.5 39.1

HCM LOS B B C E

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 67% 0% 15% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 95% 33% 0% 29% 0% 89%
Vol Right, % 0% 5% 0% 100% 56% 0% 11%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 89 304 133 79 154 154 490
LT Vol 89 0 89 0 23 154 0
Through Vol 0 290 44 0 45 0 438
RT Vol 0 14 0 79 86 0 52
Lane Flow Rate 91 310 136 81 157 157 500
Geometry Grp 7777677
Degree of Util (X) 0.192 0.609 0.312 0.162 0.34 0.315 0.921 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.61 7.064 8.284 7.219 7.788 7.219 6.632 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 471 512 433 496 460 498 545
Service Time 5.364 4.817 6.042 4.976 5.852 4.969 4.382
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.193 0.605 0.314 0.163 0.341 0.315 0.917 HCM Control Delay 12.2 20.3 14.8 11.4 14.8 13.3 47.2
HCM Lane LOS B C BBBBE
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.7 4 1.3 0.6 1.5 1.3 11.2
207
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing PM
4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave 11/29/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh15.9
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 72 281 125 23 242 24 100 78 25 41 48 62 Future Vol, veh/h 72 281 125 23 242 24 100 78 25 41 48 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 11111111111
Mvmt Flow 73 287 128 23 247 24 102 80 26 42 49 63
Number of Lanes 0 11110011010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay 17.8 15.5 14 13.3

HCM LOS C C B B

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 56% 0% 20% 0% 100% 1% 27%
Vol Thru, % 44% 0% 80% 0% 0% 90% 32%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 9% 41%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 178 25 353 125 21 268 151
LT Vol 100 0 72 0 21 2 41
Through Vol 78 0 281 0 0 242 48
RT Vol 0 25 0 125 0 24 62
Lane Flow Rate 182 26 360 128 21 274 154
Geometry Grp 7777776
Degree of Util (X) 0.376 0.046 0.651 0.202 0.042 0.504 0.306 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.448 6.446 6.51 5.693 7.193 6.623 7.152 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 483 555 558 633 500 548 502
Service Time 5.194 4.191 4.221 3.404 4.907 4.337 5.201
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.377 0.047 0.645 0.202 0.042 0.5 0.307 HCM Control Delay 14.6 9.5 20.6 9.8 10.2 15.9 13.3
HCM Lane LOS B A C A B C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.7 0.1 4.7 0.8 0.1 2.8 1.3
208
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing PM
5: Capitola Ave & Hill St 11/29/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 Road Diet Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Future Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000010000
Mvmt Flow 138 55 26 3 41 17 26 97 7 23 86 74
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 9.7 8.2 8.9 8.9

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 20% 63% 5% 13%
Vol Thru, % 74% 25% 67% 47%
Vol Right, % 6% 12% 28% 40%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 124 208 58 174
LT Vol 25 131 3 22
Through Vol 92 52 39 82
RT Vol 7 25 16 70
Lane Flow Rate 131 219 61 183
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.174 0.289 0.081 0.23
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.8 4.757 4.753 4.524
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 744 753 749 791
Service Time 2.849 2.803 2.81 2.568
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.176 0.291 0.081 0.231
HCM Control Delay 8.9 9.7 8.2 8.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 1.2 0.3 0.9
209
Item 9 B.
210
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing AM
1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 69 3 139 390 538 0 0 407 474 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 69 3 139 390 538 0 0 407 474 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1900 1885 1885 1856 0 0 1870 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 73 3 146 411 566 0 0 428 499
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 501130021
Cap, veh/h 214 4 195 742 2574 0 0 426 353
Arrive On Green 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.83 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1739 33 1583 1795 3618 0 0 1870 1469
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 73 0 149 411 566 0 0 428 499
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1739 0 1615 1795 1763 0 0 1777 1469 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 0.0 5.3 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 0.0 5.3 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 214 0 199 742 2574 0 0 426 353
V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.00 0.75 0.55 0.22 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 371 0 345 742 2574 0 0 426 353
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.1 0.0 25.4 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 22.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 2.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 44.5 202.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.9 24.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.4 0.0 27.5 3.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 67.3 225.6 LnGrp LOS C A C AAAAFF
Approach Vol, veh/h 222 977 927
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.5 1.7 152.5
Approach LOS C A F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.4 19.0 11.6 48.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.6 * 4.2 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.3 * 14 * 13 38.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 16.4 7.3 2.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 70.0
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 211
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing AM
2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 317 0 263 0 0 0 0 604 125 188 308 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 317 0 263 0 0 0 0 604 125 188 308 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1900 1856 0 1885 1856 1870 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 420 0 185 0 636 132 198 324 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 0 3 013230
Cap, veh/h 542 0 245 0 852 176 589 2459 0
Arrive On Green 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.11 0.23 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3478 0 1572 0 3031 608 1781 3618 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 420 0 185 0 387 381 198 324 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1739 0 1572 0 1791 1754 1781 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 11.8 11.8 6.2 4.4 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 11.8 11.8 6.2 4.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.35 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 542 0 245 0 519 509 589 2459 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.34 0.13 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 742 0 335 0 519 509 589 2459 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.3 0.0 24.2 0.0 19.3 19.3 20.6 8.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.3 0.0 3.8 0.0 9.4 9.7 0.1 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.8 0.0 2.6 0.0 5.9 5.8 2.6 1.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.6 0.0 28.1 0.0 28.7 29.0 20.7 8.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A C A C C C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 605 768 522
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.0 28.9 13.3
Approach LOS C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.5 24.5 22.0 13.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 * 4.6 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.4 14.3 * 17 12.8
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 8.2 13.8 9.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.0
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 212
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing AM
3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh16.1
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 51 17 30 7 38 134 59 392 12 86 329 29 Future Vol, veh/h 51 17 30 7 38 134 59 392 12 86 329 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 00031219033
Mvmt Flow 58 19 34 8 43 152 67 445 14 98 374 33
Number of Lanes 0 11010120120
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 3 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 1 2
HCM Control Delay 13.1 16 17.4 15.4

HCM LOS B C C C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 75% 0% 4% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 92% 25% 0% 21% 0% 100% 79%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 8% 0% 100% 75% 0% 0% 21%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 59 261 143 68 30 179 86 219 139
LT Vol 59 0 0 51 0 7 86 0 0
Through Vol 0 261 131 17 0 38 0 219 110
RT Vol 0 0 12 0 30 134 0 0 29
Lane Flow Rate 67 297 162 77 34 203 98 249 158
Geometry Grp 888888888
Degree of Util (X) 0.146 0.602 0.332 0.193 0.074 0.429 0.213 0.512 0.317 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.827 7.298 7.377 8.986 7.786 7.597 7.851 7.391 7.241 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 457 493 486 398 458 472 456 486 495
Service Time 5.586 5.057 5.136 6.764 5.564 5.362 5.61 5.15 5 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.147 0.602 0.333 0.193 0.074 0.43 0.215 0.512 0.319 HCM Control Delay 11.9 20.6 13.8 13.9 11.2 16 12.7 17.7 13.4 HCM Lane LOS B C B B B C B C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 3.9 1.4 0.7 0.2 2.1 0.8 2.9 1.3
213
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing AM
4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh22.7
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 56 201 81 45 318 27 63 55 13 78 68 62 Future Vol, veh/h 56 201 81 45 318 27 63 55 13 78 68 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 67 242 98 54 383 33 76 66 16 94 82 75
Number of Lanes 0 11110011010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay 18.7 30.8 14.6 19.2

HCM LOS C D B C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 53% 0% 22% 0% 100% 1% 38%
Vol Thru, % 47% 0% 78% 0% 0% 91% 33%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 8% 30%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 118 13 257 81 41 350 208
LT Vol 63 0 56 0 41 5 78
Through Vol 55 0 201 0 0 318 68
RT Vol 0 13 0 81 0 27 62
Lane Flow Rate 142 16 310 98 49 421 251
Geometry Grp 7777776
Degree of Util (X) 0.327 0.032 0.623 0.174 0.101 0.81 0.532 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.281 7.284 7.238 6.407 7.484 6.923 7.642 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 432 489 499 557 478 522 471
Service Time 6.064 5.066 5.008 4.177 5.249 4.688 5.719
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.329 0.033 0.621 0.176 0.103 0.807 0.533 HCM Control Delay 15.1 10.3 21.3 10.5 11.1 33.1 19.2
HCM Lane LOS C B C B B D C
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.4 0.1 4.2 0.6 0.3 7.8 3.1
214
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing AM
5: Capitola Ave & Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 10
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 50 22 13 6 60 34 10 89 1 16 155 104
Future Vol, veh/h 50 22 13 6 60 34 10 89 1 16 155 104
Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 47000030022
Mvmt Flow 64 28 17 8 77 44 13 114 1 21 199 133
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 9.3 9.1 9 10.9

HCM LOS A A A B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 10% 59% 6% 6%
Vol Thru, % 89% 26% 60% 56%
Vol Right, % 1% 15% 34% 38%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 100 85 100 275
LT Vol 10 50 6 16
Through Vol 89 22 60 155
RT Vol 1 13 34 104
Lane Flow Rate 128 109 128 353
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.175 0.157 0.176 0.435
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.917 5.196 4.955 4.441
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 724 684 717 807
Service Time 2.985 3.275 3.033 2.492
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.177 0.159 0.179 0.437
HCM Control Delay 9 9.3 9.1 10.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAB
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.2
215
Item 9 B.
216
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Midday 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 125 3 225 343 449 0 0 671 353 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 125 3 225 343 449 0 0 671 353 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1885 1885 1885 0 0 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 130 3 234 357 468 0 0 699 368
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 111110011
Cap, veh/h 322 4 283 642 2414 0 0 534 281
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.71 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 20 1580 1795 3676 0 0 2320 1170
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 130 0 237 357 468 0 0 562 505
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1795 0 1601 1795 1791 0 0 1791 1605 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.8 0.0 8.6 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.8 0.0 8.6 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.73
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 322 0 287 642 2414 0 0 430 385
V/C Ratio(X) 0.40 0.00 0.83 0.56 0.19 0.00 0.00 1.31 1.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 383 0 341 642 2414 0 0 430 385
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.8 0.0 23.7 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 22.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 11.4 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 154.7 157.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 0.0 3.8 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 21.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.1 0.0 35.1 6.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 177.5 179.9 LnGrp LOS C A D AAAAFF
Approach Vol, veh/h 367 825 1067
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.5 3.0 178.6
Approach LOS C A F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.0 19.0 15.0 45.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.6 * 4.2 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.3 * 14 * 13 38.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.6 16.4 10.6 2.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 90.4
HCM 6th LOS F
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 217
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Midday 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 204 97 291 0 0 0 0 555 127 290 498 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 204 97 291 0 0 0 0 555 127 290 498 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1885 1885 1885 0 1885 1885 1885 1885 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 183 240 230 0 603 138 315 541 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 1 1 1 011110
Cap, veh/h 319 335 284 0 836 191 554 2419 0
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.10 0.22 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1795 1885 1598 0 2977 658 1795 3676 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 183 240 230 0 374 367 315 541 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1795 1885 1598 0 1791 1750 1795 1791 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.6 7.2 8.3 0.0 11.2 11.3 10.0 7.4 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.6 7.2 8.3 0.0 11.2 11.3 10.0 7.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.38 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 319 335 284 0 519 508 554 2419 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 0.72 0.81 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.57 0.22 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 383 402 341 0 519 508 554 2419 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.6 23.2 23.7 0.0 19.1 19.1 23.1 10.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 3.4 9.7 0.0 8.4 8.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.2 3.2 3.6 0.0 5.5 5.5 4.7 2.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.2 26.6 33.4 0.0 27.5 27.8 23.4 10.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C A C C C B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 653 741 856
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.0 27.6 15.3
Approach LOS C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 45.1 23.1 22.0 14.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 * 4.6 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.4 14.3 * 17 12.8
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.4 12.0 13.3 10.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.6 0.1 0.9 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.0
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 218
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Midday
3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh21.8
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 75 45 68 15 25 104 60 402 23 124 458 53 Future Vol, veh/h 75 45 68 15 25 104 60 402 23 124 458 53 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 11111111111
Mvmt Flow 83 50 76 17 28 116 67 447 26 138 509 59
Number of Lanes 0 11010120120
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 3 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 1 2
HCM Control Delay 16.2 17.6 22.3 24.1

HCM LOS C C C C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 62% 0% 10% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 85% 38% 0% 17% 0% 100% 74%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 15% 0% 100% 72% 0% 0% 26%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 60 268 157 120 68 144 124 305 206
LT Vol 60 0 0 75 0 15 124 0 0
Through Vol 0 268 134 45 0 25 0 305 153
RT Vol 0 0 23 0 68 104 0 0 53
Lane Flow Rate 67 298 174 133 76 160 138 339 229
Geometry Grp 888888888
Degree of Util (X) 0.164 0.689 0.399 0.358 0.181 0.399 0.327 0.756 0.497 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.85 8.334 8.228 9.678 8.64 8.985 8.534 8.019 7.833 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 405 435 438 372 415 400 422 451 459
Service Time 6.597 6.081 5.975 7.436 6.399 6.742 6.28 5.764 5.578 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.165 0.685 0.397 0.358 0.183 0.4 0.327 0.752 0.499 HCM Control Delay 13.3 27.7 16.4 17.8 13.3 17.6 15.4 31.7 18.1 HCM Lane LOS B D C C B CCDC
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 5.1 1.9 1.6 0.7 1.9 1.4 6.3 2.7
219
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Midday
4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh22.7
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 59 306 136 33 266 35 118 73 18 52 63 80 Future Vol, veh/h 59 306 136 33 266 35 118 73 18 52 63 80 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 64 333 148 36 289 38 128 79 20 57 68 87
Number of Lanes 0 11110011010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay 26.7 22.8 17.7 17.7

HCM LOS D C C C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 62% 0% 16% 0% 100% 1% 27%
Vol Thru, % 38% 0% 84% 0% 0% 87% 32%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 12% 41%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 191 18 365 136 30 304 195
LT Vol 118 0 59 0 30 3 52
Through Vol 73 0 306 0 0 266 63
RT Vol 0 18 0 136 0 35 80
Lane Flow Rate 208 20 397 148 32 331 212
Geometry Grp 7777776
Degree of Util (X) 0.477 0.039 0.793 0.263 0.071 0.671 0.465 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.27 7.231 7.199 6.397 7.894 7.302 7.893 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 434 492 500 559 452 493 454
Service Time 6.056 5.016 4.977 4.174 5.676 5.084 5.985
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.479 0.041 0.794 0.265 0.071 0.671 0.467 HCM Control Delay 18.4 10.3 32.4 11.5 11.3 23.9 17.7
HCM Lane LOS C B D B B C C
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.5 0.1 7.3 1 0.2 4.9 2.4
220
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing Midday
5: Capitola Ave & Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Future Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000010000
Mvmt Flow 138 55 26 3 41 17 26 97 7 23 86 74
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 9.7 8.2 8.9 8.9

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 20% 63% 5% 13%
Vol Thru, % 74% 25% 67% 47%
Vol Right, % 6% 12% 28% 40%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 124 208 58 174
LT Vol 25 131 3 22
Through Vol 92 52 39 82
RT Vol 7 25 16 70
Lane Flow Rate 131 219 61 183
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.174 0.289 0.081 0.23
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.8 4.757 4.753 4.524
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 744 753 749 791
Service Time 2.849 2.803 2.81 2.568
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.176 0.291 0.081 0.231
HCM Control Delay 8.9 9.7 8.2 8.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 1.2 0.3 0.9
221
Item 9 B.
222
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing PM
1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 92 2 236 291 374 0 0 648 287 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 92 2 236 291 374 0 0 648 287 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1885 1885 1900 0 0 1885 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 96 2 246 303 390 0 0 675 299
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 001100010
Cap, veh/h 333 2 295 633 2416 0 0 570 252
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.70 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 13 1599 1795 3705 0 0 2468 1051
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 96 0 248 303 390 0 0 509 465
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 0 1612 1795 1805 0 0 1791 1634 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.0 8.9 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 0.0 8.9 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 14.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.64
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 333 0 297 633 2416 0 0 430 392
V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.00 0.84 0.48 0.16 0.00 0.00 1.18 1.18 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 386 0 344 633 2416 0 0 430 392
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.1 0.0 23.6 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 22.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 12.8 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 104.6 106.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.1 0.0 4.1 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.1 16.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.3 0.0 36.3 6.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 127.4 129.0 LnGrp LOS C A D AAAAFF
Approach Vol, veh/h 344 693 974
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.1 2.9 128.2
Approach LOS C A F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.7 19.0 15.3 44.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.6 * 4.2 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.3 * 14 * 13 38.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.5 16.4 10.9 2.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 68.6
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 223
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing PM
2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 185 155 325 0 0 0 0 465 132 317 454 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 185 155 325 0 0 0 0 465 132 317 454 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1885 0 1885 1900 1885 1900 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 192 268 269 0 511 145 348 499 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 1 010100
Cap, veh/h 360 378 318 0 792 223 516 2362 0
Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.22 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1900 1598 0 2825 770 1795 3705 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 192 268 269 0 334 322 348 499 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1900 1598 0 1791 1709 1795 1805 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 7.9 9.7 0.0 9.8 9.9 11.2 6.8 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 7.9 9.7 0.0 9.8 9.9 11.2 6.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.45 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 360 378 318 0 519 496 516 2362 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.71 0.85 0.00 0.64 0.65 0.67 0.21 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 386 405 341 0 519 496 516 2362 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.53 0.53 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.5 22.4 23.1 0.0 18.6 18.6 24.4 10.8 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 4.2 15.5 0.0 6.0 6.5 1.5 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.2 3.6 4.7 0.0 4.6 4.5 5.5 2.6 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.0 26.6 38.7 0.0 24.6 25.1 25.9 10.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C D A C C C B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 729 656 847
Approach Delay, s/veh 29.9 24.8 17.1
Approach LOS C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 43.9 21.9 22.0 16.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 * 4.6 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.4 14.3 * 17 12.8
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.8 13.2 11.9 11.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 0.0 1.0 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.5
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 224
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing PM
3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 3
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh16.3
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 89 44 79 23 45 86 89 290 14 154 438 52 Future Vol, veh/h 89 44 79 23 45 86 89 290 14 154 438 52 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000000002
Mvmt Flow 91 45 81 23 46 88 91 296 14 157 447 53
Number of Lanes 0 11010120120
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 3 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 1 2
HCM Control Delay 14.6 15.7 15 17.7

HCM LOS B C B C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 67% 0% 15% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 87% 33% 0% 29% 0% 100% 74%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 13% 0% 100% 56% 0% 0% 26%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 89 193 111 133 79 154 154 292 198
LT Vol 89 0 0 89 0 23 154 0 0
Through Vol 0 193 97 44 0 45 0 292 146
RT Vol 0 0 14 0 79 86 0 0 52
Lane Flow Rate 91 197 113 136 81 157 157 298 202
Geometry Grp 888888888
Degree of Util (X) 0.213 0.433 0.245 0.332 0.174 0.361 0.345 0.612 0.407 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.424 7.91 7.819 8.805 7.753 8.272 7.911 7.398 7.245 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 425 454 457 407 460 432 453 486 495
Service Time 6.205 5.691 5.6 6.594 5.542 6.061 5.683 5.17 5.016 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.214 0.434 0.247 0.334 0.176 0.363 0.347 0.613 0.408 HCM Control Delay 13.5 16.7 13.1 16 12.2 15.7 14.8 21.2 14.9 HCM Lane LOS B C B C B C B C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.8 2.1 1 1.4 0.6 1.6 1.5 4 2
225
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing PM
4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 4
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh15.9
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 72 281 125 23 242 24 100 78 25 41 48 62 Future Vol, veh/h 72 281 125 23 242 24 100 78 25 41 48 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 11111111111
Mvmt Flow 73 287 128 23 247 24 102 80 26 42 49 63
Number of Lanes 0 11110011010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 2 2
HCM Control Delay 17.8 15.5 14 13.3

HCM LOS C C B B

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 56% 0% 20% 0% 100% 1% 27%
Vol Thru, % 44% 0% 80% 0% 0% 90% 32%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 9% 41%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 178 25 353 125 21 268 151
LT Vol 100 0 72 0 21 2 41
Through Vol 78 0 281 0 0 242 48
RT Vol 0 25 0 125 0 24 62
Lane Flow Rate 182 26 360 128 21 274 154
Geometry Grp 7777776
Degree of Util (X) 0.376 0.046 0.651 0.202 0.042 0.504 0.306 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.448 6.446 6.51 5.693 7.193 6.623 7.152 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 483 555 558 633 500 548 502
Service Time 5.194 4.191 4.221 3.404 4.907 4.337 5.201
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.377 0.047 0.645 0.202 0.042 0.5 0.307 HCM Control Delay 14.6 9.5 20.6 9.8 10.2 15.9 13.3
HCM Lane LOS B A C A B C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.7 0.1 4.7 0.8 0.1 2.8 1.3
226
Item 9 B.

HCM 6th AWSC Existing PM
5: Capitola Ave & Hill St 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis 10:16 am 11/28/2022 AWSC Synchro 11 Report Kimley-Horn Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Future Vol, veh/h 131 52 25 3 39 16 25 92 7 22 82 70
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000010000
Mvmt Flow 138 55 26 3 41 17 26 97 7 23 86 74
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 9.7 8.2 8.9 8.9

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 20% 63% 5% 13%
Vol Thru, % 74% 25% 67% 47%
Vol Right, % 6% 12% 28% 40%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 124 208 58 174
LT Vol 25 131 3 22
Through Vol 92 52 39 82
RT Vol 7 25 16 70
Lane Flow Rate 131 219 61 183
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.174 0.289 0.081 0.23
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.8 4.757 4.753 4.524
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 744 753 749 791
Service Time 2.849 2.803 2.81 2.568
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.176 0.291 0.081 0.231
HCM Control Delay 8.9 9.7 8.2 8.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 1.2 0.3 0.9
227
Item 9 B.
228
Item 9 B.

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [EXAM (Site Folder: General)]
Bay-Hill
Site Category: Proposed Design 1
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
South: Bay Avenue
3 L2 59 2.0 67 2.0 0.461 8.1 LOS A 3.0 75.7 0.47 0.31 0.47 23.4 8 T1 392 2.0 445 2.0 0.461 8.1 LOS A 3.0 75.7 0.47 0.31 0.47 23.2 18 R2 11 2.0 13 2.0 0.461 8.1 LOS A 3.0 75.7 0.47 0.31 0.47 22.7 Approach 462 2.0 525 2.0 0.461 8.1 LOS A 3.0 75.7 0.47 0.31 0.47 23.2 East: Hill Street
1 L2 6 2.0 7 2.0 0.260 7.8 LOS A 1.1 28.9 0.62 0.61 0.62 23.5 6 T1 38 2.0 43 2.0 0.260 7.8 LOS A 1.1 28.9 0.62 0.61 0.62 23.3 16 R2 127 2.0 144 2.0 0.260 7.8 LOS A 1.1 28.9 0.62 0.61 0.62 22.8 Approach 171 2.0 194 2.0 0.260 7.8 LOS A 1.1 28.9 0.62 0.61 0.62 22.9 North: Bay Avenue
7 L2 76 2.0 86 2.0 0.412 7.2 LOS A 2.6 65.8 0.38 0.22 0.38 23.6 4 T1 329 2.0 374 2.0 0.412 7.2 LOS A 2.6 65.8 0.38 0.22 0.38 23.4 14 R2 29 2.0 33 2.0 0.412 7.2 LOS A 2.6 65.8 0.38 0.22 0.38 22.9 Approach 434 2.0 493 2.0 0.412 7.2 LOS A 2.6 65.8 0.38 0.22 0.38 23.4 West: Hill Street
5 L2 51 2.0 58 2.0 0.134 5.7 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.53 0.46 0.53 23.6 2 T1 17 2.0 19 2.0 0.134 5.7 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.53 0.46 0.53 23.3 12 R2 30 2.0 34 2.0 0.134 5.7 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.53 0.46 0.53 22.9 Approach 98 2.0 111 2.0 0.134 5.7 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.53 0.46 0.53 23.3 All Vehicles 1165 2.0 1324 2.0 0.461 7.5 LOS A 3.0 75.7 0.46 0.33 0.46 23.2 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Monday, October 17, 2022 10:22:24 AM Project: K:\SJC_TPTO\City of Capitola\097763143 - Bay-Hill Intersection Analysis\03 Analysis\Bay-Hill.sip9 229
Item 9 B.

QUEUE ANALYSIS
Site: 1 [EXAM (Site Folder: General)]
Bay-Hill
Site Category: Proposed Design 1
Roundabout
Lane Queues (Distance)
Lane
Number
Contin.

Lane
Deg.

Satn
Prog.

Factor
(Queue)
Overflow
Queue
(ft)
Back of Queue
(ft)
Queue at Start
of Green
(ft)
Cycle Average
Queue
(ft)
Queue
Storage Ratio
Prob.

Block.

Prob.

SL Ov.

Ov.

Lane
No.
v/c Av. 95% Av. 95% Av. 95% Av. 95% % %
South: Bay Avenue
Lane 1 0.461 1.000 0.0 30.5 75.7 NA NA 30.1 54.6 0.02 0.05 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.461 30.5 75.7 NA NA 30.1 54.6 0.02 0.05
East: Hill Street
Lane 1 0.260 1.000 0.0 11.6 28.9 NA NA 10.7 19.4 0.01 0.02 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.260 11.6 28.9 NA NA 10.7 19.4 0.01 0.02
North: Bay Avenue
Lane 1 0.412 1.000 0.0 26.5 65.8 NA NA 24.9 45.2 0.02 0.04 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.412 26.5 65.8 NA NA 24.9 45.2 0.02 0.04
West: Hill Street
Lane 1 0.134 1.000 0.0 5.7 14.1 NA NA 4.5 8.1 0.00 0.01 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.134 5.7 14.1 NA NA 4.5 8.1 0.00 0.01
Intersection 0.461 30.5 75.7 NA NA 30.1 54.6 0.02 0.05
Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

Lane Queues (Vehicles)
Lane
Number
Contin.

Lane
Deg.

Satn
Prog.

Factor
(Queue)
Overflow
Queue
(veh)
Back of Queue
(veh)
Queue at Start
of Green
(veh)
Cycle Average
Queue
(veh)
Queue
Storage Ratio
Prob.

Block.

Prob.

SL Ov.

Ov.

Lane
No.
v/c Av. 95% Av. 95% Av. 95% Av. 95% % %
South: Bay Avenue
Lane 1 0.461 1.000 0.0 1.2 3.0 NA NA 1.2 2.2 0.02 0.05 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.461 1.2 3.0 NA NA 1.2 2.2 0.02 0.05
East: Hill Street
Lane 1 0.260 1.000 0.0 0.5 1.1 NA NA 0.4 0.8 0.01 0.02 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.260 0.5 1.1 NA NA 0.4 0.8 0.01 0.02
North: Bay Avenue
Lane 1 0.412 1.000 0.0 1.0 2.6 NA NA 1.0 1.8 0.02 0.04 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.412 1.0 2.6 NA NA 1.0 1.8 0.02 0.04
West: Hill Street
Lane 1 0.134 1.000 0.0 0.2 0.6 NA NA 0.2 0.3 0.00 0.01 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.134 0.2 0.6 NA NA 0.2 0.3 0.00 0.01
Intersection 0.461 1.2 3.0 NA NA 1.2 2.2 0.02 0.05
Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.
230
Item 9 B.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

Continuous Lane Performance
Lane Number Deg.

Satn
Unint.

Speed
Unint.

Travel
Delay
Hdwy Spacing Aver.

Vehicle
Length
Occup.

Time
Space
Time
Space
Occup.

Ratio
Time
Occup.

Ratio
Density LOS
(Density
Method)
v/c mph sec sec ft ft sec sec % % veh/mi pc/mi
South: Bay Avenue
This approach does not have any continuous lanes
East: Hill Street
This approach does not have any continuous lanes
North: Bay Avenue
This approach does not have any continuous lanes
West: Hill Street
This approach does not have any continuous lanes
Midblock Effective Detection Zone Length = 7 ft
SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Monday, October 17, 2022 10:22:24 AM Project: K:\SJC_TPTO\City of Capitola\097763143 - Bay-Hill Intersection Analysis\03 Analysis\Bay-Hill.sip9 231
Item 9 B.

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [EX-Midday (Site Folder: General)]
Bay-Hill
Site Category: Proposed Design 1
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
South: Bay Avenue
3 L2 60 1.0 67 1.0 0.523 9.9 LOS A 3.7 94.1 0.62 0.53 0.66 23.0 8 T1 402 1.0 447 1.0 0.523 9.9 LOS A 3.7 94.1 0.62 0.53 0.66 22.8 18 R2 23 1.0 26 1.0 0.523 9.9 LOS A 3.7 94.1 0.62 0.53 0.66 22.3 Approach 485 1.0 539 1.0 0.523 9.9 LOS A 3.7 94.1 0.62 0.53 0.66 22.8 East: Hill Street
1 L2 15 1.0 17 1.0 0.217 7.3 LOS A 0.9 23.3 0.61 0.60 0.61 23.5 6 T1 25 1.0 28 1.0 0.217 7.3 LOS A 0.9 23.3 0.61 0.60 0.61 23.3 16 R2 104 1.0 116 1.0 0.217 7.3 LOS A 0.9 23.3 0.61 0.60 0.61 22.8 Approach 144 1.0 160 1.0 0.217 7.3 LOS A 0.9 23.3 0.61 0.60 0.61 23.0 North: Bay Avenue
7 L2 124 1.0 138 1.0 0.580 9.9 LOS A 4.8 122.0 0.48 0.28 0.48 22.9 4 T1 458 1.0 509 1.0 0.580 9.9 LOS A 4.8 122.0 0.48 0.28 0.48 22.7 14 R2 53 1.0 59 1.0 0.580 9.9 LOS A 4.8 122.0 0.48 0.28 0.48 22.3 Approach 635 1.0 706 1.0 0.580 9.9 LOS A 4.8 122.0 0.48 0.28 0.48 22.7 West: Hill Street
5 L2 75 1.0 83 1.0 0.303 9.0 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.66 0.66 0.66 22.9 2 T1 45 1.0 50 1.0 0.303 9.0 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.66 0.66 0.66 22.7 12 R2 68 1.0 76 1.0 0.303 9.0 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.66 0.66 0.66 22.2 Approach 188 1.0 209 1.0 0.303 9.0 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.66 0.66 0.66 22.6 All Vehicles 1452 1.0 1613 1.0 0.580 9.5 LOS A 4.8 122.0 0.56 0.45 0.58 22.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Monday, November 28, 2022 9:08:16 AM Project: K:\SJC_TPTO\City of Capitola\097763143 - Bay-Hill Intersection Analysis\03 Analysis\Bay-Hill.sip9 232
Item 9 B.

QUEUE ANALYSIS
Site: 1 [EX-Midday (Site Folder: General)]
Bay-Hill
Site Category: Proposed Design 1
Roundabout
Lane Queues (Distance)
Lane
Number
Contin.

Lane
Deg.

Satn
Prog.

Factor
(Queue)
Overflow
Queue
(ft)
Back of Queue
(ft)
Queue at Start
of Green
(ft)
Cycle Average
Queue
(ft)
Queue
Storage Ratio
Prob.

Block.

Prob.

SL Ov.

Ov.

Lane
No.
v/c Av. 95% Av. 95% Av. 95% Av. 95% % %
South: Bay Avenue
Lane 1 0.523 1.000 2.1 37.9 94.1 NA NA 37.3 67.7 0.02 0.06 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.523 37.9 94.1 NA NA 37.3 67.7 0.02 0.06
East: Hill Street
Lane 1 0.217 1.000 0.0 9.4 23.3 NA NA 8.2 14.9 0.01 0.01 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.217 9.4 23.3 NA NA 8.2 14.9 0.01 0.01
North: Bay Avenue
Lane 1 0.580 1.000 0.0 49.1 122.0 NA NA 48.7 88.3 0.03 0.08 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.580 49.1 122.0 NA NA 48.7 88.3 0.03 0.08
West: Hill Street
Lane 1 0.303 1.000 0.0 13.5 33.6 NA NA 13.2 23.9 0.01 0.02 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.303 13.5 33.6 NA NA 13.2 23.9 0.01 0.02
Intersection 0.580 49.1 122.0 NA NA 48.7 88.3 0.03 0.08 Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

Lane Queues (Vehicles)
Lane
Number
Contin.

Lane
Deg.

Satn
Prog.

Factor
(Queue)
Overflow
Queue
(veh)
Back of Queue
(veh)
Queue at Start
of Green
(veh)
Cycle Average
Queue
(veh)
Queue
Storage Ratio
Prob.

Block.

Prob.

SL Ov.

Ov.

Lane
No.
v/c Av. 95% Av. 95% Av. 95% Av. 95% % %
South: Bay Avenue
Lane 1 0.523 1.000 0.1 1.5 3.7 NA NA 1.5 2.7 0.02 0.06 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.523 1.5 3.7 NA NA 1.5 2.7 0.02 0.06
East: Hill Street
Lane 1 0.217 1.000 0.0 0.4 0.9 NA NA 0.3 0.6 0.01 0.01 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.217 0.4 0.9 NA NA 0.3 0.6 0.01 0.01
North: Bay Avenue
Lane 1 0.580 1.000 0.0 1.9 4.8 NA NA 1.9 3.5 0.03 0.08 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.580 1.9 4.8 NA NA 1.9 3.5 0.03 0.08
West: Hill Street
Lane 1 0.303 1.000 0.0 0.5 1.3 NA NA 0.5 0.9 0.01 0.02 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.303 0.5 1.3 NA NA 0.5 0.9 0.01 0.02
Intersection 0.580 1.9 4.8 NA NA 1.9 3.5 0.03 0.08
Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.
233
Item 9 B.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

Continuous Lane Performance
Lane Number Deg.

Satn
Unint.

Speed
Unint.

Travel
Delay
Hdwy Spacing Aver.

Vehicle
Length
Occup.

Time
Space
Time
Space
Occup.

Ratio
Time
Occup.

Ratio
Density LOS
(Density
Method)
v/c mph sec sec ft ft sec sec % % veh/mi pc/mi
South: Bay Avenue
This approach does not have any continuous lanes
East: Hill Street
This approach does not have any continuous lanes
North: Bay Avenue
This approach does not have any continuous lanes
West: Hill Street
This approach does not have any continuous lanes
Midblock Effective Detection Zone Length = 7 ft
SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Monday, November 28, 2022 9:08:16 AM Project: K:\SJC_TPTO\City of Capitola\097763143 - Bay-Hill Intersection Analysis\03 Analysis\Bay-Hill.sip9 234
Item 9 B.

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 1 [EXPM (Site Folder: General)]
Bay-Hill
Site Category: Proposed Design 1
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
Turn Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Effective
Stop
Rate
Aver.

No.

Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
South: Bay Avenue
3 L2 86 1.0 88 1.0 0.389 7.7 LOS A 2.2 54.6 0.54 0.43 0.54 23.4 8 T1 290 1.0 296 1.0 0.389 7.7 LOS A 2.2 54.6 0.54 0.43 0.54 23.2 18 R2 13 1.0 13 1.0 0.389 7.7 LOS A 2.2 54.6 0.54 0.43 0.54 22.7 Approach 389 1.0 397 1.0 0.389 7.7 LOS A 2.2 54.6 0.54 0.43 0.54 23.2 East: Hill Street
1 L2 22 1.0 22 1.0 0.174 6.1 LOS A 0.8 18.9 0.55 0.49 0.55 23.8 6 T1 45 1.0 46 1.0 0.174 6.1 LOS A 0.8 18.9 0.55 0.49 0.55 23.6 16 R2 76 1.0 78 1.0 0.174 6.1 LOS A 0.8 18.9 0.55 0.49 0.55 23.1 Approach 143 1.0 146 1.0 0.174 6.1 LOS A 0.8 18.9 0.55 0.49 0.55 23.4 North: Bay Avenue
7 L2 142 1.0 145 1.0 0.555 9.7 LOS A 4.2 106.4 0.53 0.35 0.53 23.0 4 T1 438 1.0 447 1.0 0.555 9.7 LOS A 4.2 106.4 0.53 0.35 0.53 22.7 14 R2 52 1.0 53 1.0 0.555 9.7 LOS A 4.2 106.4 0.53 0.35 0.53 22.3 Approach 632 1.0 645 1.0 0.555 9.7 LOS A 4.2 106.4 0.53 0.35 0.53 22.7 West: Hill Street
5 L2 89 1.0 91 1.0 0.298 8.6 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.65 0.65 0.65 23.0 2 T1 44 1.0 45 1.0 0.298 8.6 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.65 0.65 0.65 22.7 12 R2 79 1.0 81 1.0 0.298 8.6 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.65 0.65 0.65 22.3 Approach 212 1.0 216 1.0 0.298 8.6 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.65 0.65 0.65 22.7 All Vehicles 1376 1.0 1404 1.0 0.555 8.6 LOS A 4.2 106.4 0.55 0.43 0.55 22.9 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Monday, October 17, 2022 10:22:14 AM Project: K:\SJC_TPTO\City of Capitola\097763143 - Bay-Hill Intersection Analysis\03 Analysis\Bay-Hill.sip9 235
Item 9 B.

QUEUE ANALYSIS
Site: 1 [EXPM (Site Folder: General)]
Bay-Hill
Site Category: Proposed Design 1
Roundabout
Lane Queues (Distance)
Lane
Number
Contin.

Lane
Deg.

Satn
Prog.

Factor
(Queue)
Overflow
Queue
(ft)
Back of Queue
(ft)
Queue at Start
of Green
(ft)
Cycle Average
Queue
(ft)
Queue
Storage Ratio
Prob.

Block.

Prob.

SL Ov.

Ov.

Lane
No.
v/c Av. 95% Av. 95% Av. 95% Av. 95% % %
South: Bay Avenue
Lane 1 0.389 1.000 0.0 22.0 54.6 NA NA 21.4 38.8 0.01 0.03 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.389 22.0 54.6 NA NA 21.4 38.8 0.01 0.03
East: Hill Street
Lane 1 0.174 1.000 0.0 7.6 18.9 NA NA 6.2 11.3 0.00 0.01 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.174 7.6 18.9 NA NA 6.2 11.3 0.00 0.01
North: Bay Avenue
Lane 1 0.555 1.000 0.0 42.8 106.4 NA NA 43.7 79.3 0.03 0.07 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.555 42.8 106.4 NA NA 43.7 79.3 0.03 0.07
West: Hill Street
Lane 1 0.298 1.000 0.0 13.5 33.6 NA NA 13.0 23.5 0.01 0.02 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.298 13.5 33.6 NA NA 13.0 23.5 0.01 0.02
Intersection 0.555 42.8 106.4 NA NA 43.7 79.3 0.03 0.07 Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

Lane Queues (Vehicles)
Lane
Number
Contin.

Lane
Deg.

Satn
Prog.

Factor
(Queue)
Overflow
Queue
(veh)
Back of Queue
(veh)
Queue at Start
of Green
(veh)
Cycle Average
Queue
(veh)
Queue
Storage Ratio
Prob.

Block.

Prob.

SL Ov.

Ov.

Lane
No.
v/c Av. 95% Av. 95% Av. 95% Av. 95% % %
South: Bay Avenue
Lane 1 0.389 1.000 0.0 0.9 2.2 NA NA 0.8 1.5 0.01 0.03 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.389 0.9 2.2 NA NA 0.8 1.5 0.01 0.03
East: Hill Street
Lane 1 0.174 1.000 0.0 0.3 0.8 NA NA 0.2 0.4 0.00 0.01 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.174 0.3 0.8 NA NA 0.2 0.4 0.00 0.01
North: Bay Avenue
Lane 1 0.555 1.000 0.0 1.7 4.2 NA NA 1.7 3.1 0.03 0.07 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.555 1.7 4.2 NA NA 1.7 3.1 0.03 0.07
West: Hill Street
Lane 1 0.298 1.000 0.0 0.5 1.3 NA NA 0.5 0.9 0.01 0.02 0.0 NA NA Approach 0.298 0.5 1.3 NA NA 0.5 0.9 0.01 0.02
Intersection 0.555 1.7 4.2 NA NA 1.7 3.1 0.03 0.07
Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.
236
Item 9 B.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1.

Continuous Lane Performance
Lane Number Deg.

Satn
Unint.

Speed
Unint.

Travel
Delay
Hdwy Spacing Aver.

Vehicle
Length
Occup.

Time
Space
Time
Space
Occup.

Ratio
Time
Occup.

Ratio
Density LOS
(Density
Method)
v/c mph sec sec ft ft sec sec % % veh/mi pc/mi
South: Bay Avenue
This approach does not have any continuous lanes
East: Hill Street
This approach does not have any continuous lanes
North: Bay Avenue
This approach does not have any continuous lanes
West: Hill Street
This approach does not have any continuous lanes
Midblock Effective Detection Zone Length = 7 ft
SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Monday, October 17, 2022 10:22:14 AM Project: K:\SJC_TPTO\City of Capitola\097763143 - Bay-Hill Intersection Analysis\03 Analysis\Bay-Hill.sip9 237
Item 9 B.

Bay / Hill – Intersection Operations Analysis
Attachment D – Synchro Queuing Results
238
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Signal 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection: 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp
Movement WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 192 66 263 75 76 496 496
Average Queue (ft) 48 26 195 23 27 158 296
95th Queue (ft) 106 52 287 58 66 418 487
Link Distance (ft) 235 235 235 481 481
Upstream Blk Time (%) 8 1 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 23 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 180
Storage Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2
Intersection: 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp
Movement EB EB EB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 376 85 272 321 159 117 78
Average Queue (ft) 122 227 57 141 165 91 64 37
95th Queue (ft) 217 386 112 243 288 136 104 74
Link Distance (ft) 662 662 235 235 235
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 53 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 153 4
Intersection: 3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St
Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 89 70 116 83 86 120 79 205 123
Average Queue (ft) 36 14 53 31 37 43 44 91 33
95th Queue (ft) 78 44 84 61 72 80 74 175 82
Link Distance (ft) 95 348 313 313 662 662
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 45 60 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 5 0 1 1 6 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 3 1 10 10
239
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Signal 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection: 4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LT R LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 127 94 205 65 28 92
Average Queue (ft) 58 23 70 32 10 47
95th Queue (ft) 109 83 140 52 31 80
Link Distance (ft) 684 1089 771 981
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 5 0 29 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 4060
Intersection: 5: Capitola Ave & Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 95 58 55 88
Average Queue (ft) 39 34 35 53
95th Queue (ft) 71 52 50 81
Link Distance (ft) 516 1007 981 402
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 225
240
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Signal 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection: 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp
Movement WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 133 84 246 73 73 533 520
Average Queue (ft) 71 35 137 25 26 408 459
95th Queue (ft) 115 66 235 58 59 692 601
Link Distance (ft) 235 235 235 481 481
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 51 62
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 180
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp
Movement EB EB EB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 347 85 293 354 246 160 133
Average Queue (ft) 102 244 72 132 188 124 92 61
95th Queue (ft) 217 402 121 222 307 227 141 99
Link Distance (ft) 662 662 235 235 235
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 4
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 62 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 153 5
Intersection: 3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St
Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 135 70 76 84 90 120 80 336 275
Average Queue (ft) 57 41 46 38 47 56 63 154 72
95th Queue (ft) 98 83 76 71 86 100 97 250 182
Link Distance (ft) 95 348 313 313 662 662
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 45 60 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 14 1 1 3 16 27
Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 1 2 2 36 33
241
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Signal 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection: 4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LT R LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 650 95 405 173 80 150
Average Queue (ft) 258 73 178 73 16 58
95th Queue (ft) 544 135 354 130 59 111
Link Distance (ft) 684 1089 771 981
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 56 0 66 18 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 77 2 11 3 0
Intersection: 5: Capitola Ave & Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 74 55 74 75
Average Queue (ft) 49 28 34 44
95th Queue (ft) 68 49 54 69
Link Distance (ft) 516 1007 981 402
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 340
242
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Signal 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection: 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp
Movement WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 161 123 245 68 73 405 451
Average Queue (ft) 60 44 157 20 24 139 240
95th Queue (ft) 119 80 248 55 61 337 444
Link Distance (ft) 235 235 235 481 481
Upstream Blk Time (%) 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 10
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 180
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Intersection: 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp
Movement EB EB EB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 358 85 205 256 242 146 120
Average Queue (ft) 132 332 84 94 158 139 82 47
95th Queue (ft) 238 375 88 144 232 200 127 85
Link Distance (ft) 662 662 235 235 235
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 77 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 195 6
Intersection: 3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St
Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 100 70 118 75 76 107 80 242 216
Average Queue (ft) 54 37 49 40 30 52 64 119 54
95th Queue (ft) 90 74 89 73 61 84 92 204 143
Link Distance (ft) 95 348 313 313 662 662
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 45 60 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 11 1 3 1 20 21
Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 2 4 1 44 33
243
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Signal 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection: 4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LT R LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 304 95 115 107 49 86
Average Queue (ft) 81 26 41 44 18 42
95th Queue (ft) 186 79 88 83 42 73
Link Distance (ft) 684 1089 771 981
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 12 0 14 5 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 15 0210
Intersection: 5: Capitola Ave & Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 76 56 56 72
Average Queue (ft) 50 34 36 41
95th Queue (ft) 69 48 51 62
Link Distance (ft) 516 1007 981 402
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 324
244
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Roundabout 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection: 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp
Movement WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 109 96 248 51 78 496 496
Average Queue (ft) 43 43 171 28 31 237 352
95th Queue (ft) 81 76 273 56 70 534 573
Link Distance (ft) 235 235 235 481 481
Upstream Blk Time (%) 7 4 11
Queuing Penalty (veh) 22 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 180
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp
Movement EB EB EB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 339 85 268 339 200 128 80
Average Queue (ft) 101 183 57 115 177 90 73 23
95th Queue (ft) 200 292 115 219 300 149 116 54
Link Distance (ft) 448 448 235 235 235
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 49 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 140 3
Intersection: 3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 54 97 98 86
Average Queue (ft) 18 30 31 31
95th Queue (ft) 49 65 79 82
Link Distance (ft) 88 342 300 143
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
245
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Roundabout 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection: 4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LT R LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 73 90 308 68 28 134
Average Queue (ft) 40 12 107 31 14 70
95th Queue (ft) 77 52 228 58 36 115
Link Distance (ft) 684 1089 771 981
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0 46 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 10 0
Intersection: 5: Capitola Ave & Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 78 54 67 139
Average Queue (ft) 39 37 37 55
95th Queue (ft) 63 54 59 91
Link Distance (ft) 516 1007 981 402
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 177
246
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Roundabout 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection: 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp
Movement WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 134 110 246 26 29 496 496
Average Queue (ft) 67 52 171 8 2 359 423
95th Queue (ft) 118 95 252 28 14 602 604
Link Distance (ft) 235 235 235 481 481
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 11 23
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 180
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp
Movement EB EB EB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 339 85 242 308 261 183 83
Average Queue (ft) 110 270 59 117 185 168 72 13
95th Queue (ft) 216 386 119 202 271 239 126 47
Link Distance (ft) 448 448 235 235 235
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 59 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 145 1
Intersection: 3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 109 54 119 210
Average Queue (ft) 40 25 51 56
95th Queue (ft) 87 57 97 150
Link Distance (ft) 88 342 300 143
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 12
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
247
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Roundabout 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection: 4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LT R LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 328 95 281 174 80 152
Average Queue (ft) 112 41 108 65 15 65
95th Queue (ft) 260 112 227 135 45 121
Link Distance (ft) 684 1089 771 981
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 28 0 49 15
Queuing Penalty (veh) 37 1 8 3
Intersection: 5: Capitola Ave & Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 57 32 57 55
Average Queue (ft) 42 23 35 39
95th Queue (ft) 61 46 55 56
Link Distance (ft) 516 1007 981 402
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 214
248
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Roundabout 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection: 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp
Movement WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 134 124 244 26 315 361
Average Queue (ft) 54 49 149 3 114 224
95th Queue (ft) 111 92 230 16 243 355
Link Distance (ft) 235 235 481 481
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 180
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp
Movement EB EB EB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 339 85 217 303 226 161 138
Average Queue (ft) 120 339 63 96 164 155 75 24
95th Queue (ft) 237 339 118 189 264 211 135 75
Link Distance (ft) 448 448 235 235 235
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 73 6
Queuing Penalty (veh) 185 28
Intersection: 3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB B9
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR T
Maximum Queue (ft) 78 77 98 214 76
Average Queue (ft) 37 26 42 99 4
95th Queue (ft) 67 56 82 206 31
Link Distance (ft) 88 342 300 143 448
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 30
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
249
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Roundabout 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection: 4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LT R LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 166 95 208 85 52 66
Average Queue (ft) 58 21 70 42 20 34
95th Queue (ft) 123 77 146 70 47 59
Link Distance (ft) 684 1089 771 981
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 8 0 28 2 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 11 0310
Intersection: 5: Capitola Ave & Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 73 55 56 56
Average Queue (ft) 41 30 37 40
95th Queue (ft) 64 45 53 60
Link Distance (ft) 516 1007 981 402
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 259
250
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Road Diet 11/29/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection: 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp
Movement WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 81 239 69 88 489 496
Average Queue (ft) 53 32 176 24 31 106 210
95th Queue (ft) 124 58 252 57 78 296 381
Link Distance (ft) 235 235 235 481 481
Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 0 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 10 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 180
Storage Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1
Intersection: 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp
Movement EB EB EB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 376 85 352 368 179 122 112
Average Queue (ft) 116 237 61 101 172 103 75 32
95th Queue (ft) 198 408 117 212 317 166 103 88
Link Distance (ft) 412 412 235 235 235
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 59 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 172 8
Intersection: 3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR L TR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 75 70 55 84 178 80 166
Average Queue (ft) 32 26 46 26 64 36 78
95th Queue (ft) 54 54 63 59 116 77 131
Link Distance (ft) 107 361 312 192
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 45 60 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 1 0 6 0 14
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 0 4 0 12
251
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Road Diet 11/29/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection: 4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LT R LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 149 32 395 68 28 101
Average Queue (ft) 41 3 121 34 8 54
95th Queue (ft) 88 16 291 59 28 91
Link Distance (ft) 684 1089 771 981
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 46 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 10 0
Intersection: 5: Capitola Ave & Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 68 56 55 90
Average Queue (ft) 31 32 36 52
95th Queue (ft) 52 48 55 77
Link Distance (ft) 516 1007 981 402
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 221
252
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Road Diet 11/29/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection: 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp
Movement WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 136 82 254 68 72 515 496
Average Queue (ft) 69 41 146 31 36 376 430
95th Queue (ft) 115 69 231 59 71 620 596
Link Distance (ft) 235 235 235 481 481
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 17 27
Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 180
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp
Movement EB EB EB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 376 85 247 237 244 171 125
Average Queue (ft) 156 313 71 100 158 135 104 49
95th Queue (ft) 234 424 116 177 228 214 144 104
Link Distance (ft) 412 412 235 235 235
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 76 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 10 187 10
Intersection: 3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB SB B9
Directions Served LT R LTR L TR L TR T
Maximum Queue (ft) 78 70 92 84 204 80 264 89
Average Queue (ft) 48 39 48 30 82 66 138 9
95th Queue (ft) 78 68 78 71 157 100 238 47
Link Distance (ft) 107 361 312 192 412
Upstream Blk Time (%) 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 28
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 45 60 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 7 2 0 19 2 42
Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 2 0 12 11 52
253
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Road Diet 11/29/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection: 4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LT R LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 504 95 234 172 80 136
Average Queue (ft) 149 48 106 72 14 64
95th Queue (ft) 358 119 197 134 44 115
Link Distance (ft) 684 1089 771 981
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 32 0 53 18
Queuing Penalty (veh) 43 1 9 3
Intersection: 5: Capitola Ave & Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 79 56 74 74
Average Queue (ft) 48 30 36 39
95th Queue (ft) 70 57 56 61
Link Distance (ft) 516 1007 981 402
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 379
254
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Road Diet 11/29/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection: 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp
Movement WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 92 86 253 74 71 496 496
Average Queue (ft) 55 41 122 20 31 165 273
95th Queue (ft) 93 75 197 52 68 385 480
Link Distance (ft) 235 235 235 481 481
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 1 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 180
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp
Movement EB EB EB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 358 85 222 240 246 135 99
Average Queue (ft) 131 339 79 96 157 142 99 40
95th Queue (ft) 247 345 112 174 224 220 133 82
Link Distance (ft) 412 412 235 235 235
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 80 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 203 3
Intersection: 3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB SB B9
Directions Served LT R LTR L TR L TR T
Maximum Queue (ft) 95 70 96 84 129 80 264 151
Average Queue (ft) 45 39 45 29 51 73 154 12
95th Queue (ft) 74 68 74 55 74 95 267 69
Link Distance (ft) 107 361 312 192 412
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 7
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 52
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 45 60 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 7 2 0 5 2 40
Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 2 1 4 11 61
255
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
Road Diet 11/29/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection: 4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LT R LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 133 95 197 149 80 110
Average Queue (ft) 50 12 54 55 20 43
95th Queue (ft) 97 52 121 107 52 80
Link Distance (ft) 684 1089 771 981
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 4 0 20 10 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 40230
Intersection: 5: Capitola Ave & Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 55 56 54 88
Average Queue (ft) 38 34 33 47
95th Queue (ft) 55 47 50 75
Link Distance (ft) 516 1007 981 402
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 360
256
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
AWSC 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection: 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp
Movement WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 91 119 252 108 113 496 496
Average Queue (ft) 41 33 176 22 24 215 350
95th Queue (ft) 70 70 275 51 62 491 540
Link Distance (ft) 235 235 235 481 481
Upstream Blk Time (%) 10 5 9
Queuing Penalty (veh) 30 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 180
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp
Movement EB EB EB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 363 85 301 288 147 130 55
Average Queue (ft) 125 260 68 132 166 88 58 36
95th Queue (ft) 229 412 115 245 272 133 97 59
Link Distance (ft) 662 662 235 235 235
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 61 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 176 7
Intersection: 3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St
Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 74 55 98 48 66 68 79 121 130
Average Queue (ft) 30 17 46 26 32 38 41 74 36
95th Queue (ft) 54 44 74 43 53 62 81 108 81
Link Distance (ft) 95 348 313 313 662 662
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 45 60 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 0 0 1 1 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 0 0 1 10
257
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
AWSC 11/28/2022
Existing AM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection: 4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LT R LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 112 95 327 70 29 117
Average Queue (ft) 43 12 101 36 11 45
95th Queue (ft) 81 50 241 59 32 78
Link Distance (ft) 684 1089 771 981
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 0 41 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2090
Intersection: 5: Capitola Ave & Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 55 79 55 75
Average Queue (ft) 31 34 31 53
95th Queue (ft) 45 54 54 74
Link Distance (ft) 516 1007 981 402
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 236
258
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
AWSC 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection: 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp
Movement WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 154 86 237 67 69 520 520
Average Queue (ft) 69 47 153 35 32 497 497
95th Queue (ft) 123 84 235 62 61 505 504
Link Distance (ft) 235 235 235 481 481
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 68 85
Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 180
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp
Movement EB EB EB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 339 85 251 326 240 230 124
Average Queue (ft) 85 246 69 115 154 138 94 61
95th Queue (ft) 194 405 118 199 231 224 155 98
Link Distance (ft) 662 662 235 235 235
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 57 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 141 5
Intersection: 3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St
Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 112 70 74 50 66 106 80 277 125
Average Queue (ft) 44 44 39 25 34 46 69 120 58
95th Queue (ft) 76 68 61 44 60 83 98 191 111
Link Distance (ft) 95 348 313 313 662 662
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 45 60 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 6 2 0 1 3 36
Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 3 0 0 7 44
259
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
AWSC 11/28/2022
Existing Midday Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection: 4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LT R LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 441 95 703 192 80 157
Average Queue (ft) 208 68 339 70 19 68
95th Queue (ft) 426 137 719 139 58 122
Link Distance (ft) 684 1089 771 981
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 59 0 74 20 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 80 2 12 4 0
Intersection: 5: Capitola Ave & Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 69 56 56 75
Average Queue (ft) 44 29 37 42
95th Queue (ft) 64 52 55 64
Link Distance (ft) 516 1007 981 402
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 308
260
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
AWSC 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 1
Intersection: 1: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 NB Off-Ramp
Movement WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T T T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 114 90 241 73 73 330 431
Average Queue (ft) 52 48 106 37 33 146 244
95th Queue (ft) 94 79 182 70 69 296 417
Link Distance (ft) 235 235 235 481 481
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 180
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 2: Bay Ave & Hwy 1 SB Off-Ramp
Movement EB EB EB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR R T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 363 85 159 272 221 160 115
Average Queue (ft) 133 332 84 87 158 140 94 58
95th Queue (ft) 245 384 89 143 247 206 136 100
Link Distance (ft) 662 662 235 235 235
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 60
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 77 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 195 7
Intersection: 3: Bay Ave & Retail Dwy/Hill St
Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 78 70 82 51 46 79 80 288 247
Average Queue (ft) 43 34 46 31 26 38 68 129 72
95th Queue (ft) 74 67 72 47 40 67 97 237 168
Link Distance (ft) 95 348 313 313 662 662
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 45 60 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 8 1 0 0 5 33
Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 2 0 0 11 51
261
Item 9 B.

Queuing and Blocking Report
AWSC 11/28/2022
Existing PM Bay-Hill Analysis SimTraffic Report
Kimley-Horn Page 2
Intersection: 4: Capitola Ave & Bay Ave
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LT R LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 213 95 136 127 80 86
Average Queue (ft) 67 18 50 55 26 43
95th Queue (ft) 146 76 102 99 56 72
Link Distance (ft) 684 1089 771 981
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 55
Storage Blk Time (%) 15 0 18 6 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 18 0210
Intersection: 5: Capitola Ave & Hill St
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 55 32 56 73
Average Queue (ft) 35 28 36 43
95th Queue (ft) 49 44 56 63
Link Distance (ft) 516 1007 981 402
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 296
262
Item 9 B.

NORTH
CITY OF CAPITOLA - BAY/HILL INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS ALTERNATIVE 2 ROUNDABOUT CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR PLANNING PURPOSES. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

CROSSROADS LOOP BAY AVENUE

NOB HILL

DRIVEWAY

HILL STREET

NOB HILL

DRIVEWAY
263
Item 9 B.

NORTH
CITY OF CAPITOLA - BAY/HILL INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS ALTERNATIVE 3 ALL-WAY STOP WITH ROAD DIET CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR PLANNING PURPOSES. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

CROSSROADS LOOP BAY AVENUE

NOB HILL

DRIVEWAY

HILL STREET

NOB HILL

DRIVEWAY
264
Item 9 B.

Bay Avenue and Hill
Street Traffic Safety
City Council
September 28, 2023
265
Item 9 B.
266
Item 9 B.

Accident Data: Nov 2017 – Aug 2023
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
Count Primary Collision Factor Collision Severity Vehicle Collision Type
Head On 1 Other Property Damage
Sideswipe 4 Improper Turn, Auto R/W Property Damage
Rearend 1 Unsafe Speed Property Damage
Injury, PDO Improper Turn, Auto R/W,
Unsafe Speed Broadside 6
Hit Object 1 Improper Turn Property Damage
Auto/Ped 3 Failure to Yield Injury
267
Item 9 B.

Pedestrian Accidents
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
268
Item 9 B.
• Level of traffic flow
• Currently LOS C
Level of Service - LOS
• Space needed to stack
• Turning and through Lanes
Queue Length
• Visibility
• Crossing distance
Bike and Pedestrian Access
Evaluation Criteria
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
269
Item 9 B.

Alternatives
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
All-way Stop
Control Signal Control Roundabout Road Diet
270
Item 9 B.

Signalized Intersection
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
271
Item 9 B.
• Reduces driver uncertainty
• Provides designated crossing times
Pros
• High capital and maintenance costs
• Increased accident rate
• Asthetics
• Increased idle time
Cons
Signalized Intersection
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
272
Item 9 B.

Roundabout
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
273
Item 9 B.

Roundabout
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
274
Item 9 B.

Roundabout – Conflict Points
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
275
Item 9 B.

Roundabout – Conflict Points
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
276
Item 9 B.

Roundabout – Conflict Points
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
277
Item 9 B.
• Reduction in conflict points for vechiles and pedestrains • Shortened crossing distances
• Improved LOS
• Reduced GHG emissions
Pros
• High initial capital cost
• Driver uncertainty
Cons
Roundabout
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
278
Item 9 B.

Road Diet
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
279
Item 9 B.

Road Diet "Quick Build"
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
Existing condition Interim curb
extension (paint
and delineators)
Permanent curb
extension and
raised intersecƟon
280
Item 9 B.

Road Diet – Reduced Speeds
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
281
Item 9 B.

Road Diet – Increased Visibility
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
282
Item 9 B.
• Improved driver certainty
• Reduced vehicle speeds
• Increased pedestrian visibility
• Shortened crossing distances
Pros
• Decreased LOS
• Increased queueing
Cons
Road Diet
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
283
Item 9 B.

Alternatives Summary
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
Signal Roundabout Road Diet
LOS
Queueing
Collision Frequency
Pedestrian Mobility
Pedestrian Safety
Construction Cost
AestheƟcs
GHG emissions 284
Item 9 B.

Road Diet "Quick Build" Examples
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
285
Item 9 B.

Road Diet "Quick Build" Examples
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
286
Item 9 B.
• Winter 2023: Receive feedback from adjacent
properties and complete public outreach
• Spring 2024 – Spring 2026: Road Diet "Quick Build”
Short Term
• 2024: Roundabout public education/outreach
• On-going: Pursue funding options
• Summer 2026: Construct Roundabout
Long Term
Next Steps – Staff Recommendation
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
287
Item 9 B.

Additional Slides
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
288
Item 9 B.
• Road Diet "Quick Build"
• Pursue permanent alternative
• No Action
Short Term Options
• Permanant Road Diet based on outcome of "Quick
Build"
• Roundabout public education, pursue funding options
Long Term Options
Next Steps - Alternatives
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
289
Item 9 B.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: September 28, 2023
From: City Manager Department
Subject: City Council Appointments to City Advisory Bodies Recommended Action: Appoint members of the public to the City of Capitola Commission on the Environment.

Background: The Commission on the Environment advises the City Council on matters of an environmental concern. The Commission on the Environment (COE) was created in 2005 through the adoption of Resolution No. 3424 and is composed of the Mayor and 4 appointees (1 per Council Member).

The COE also allows non-voting ex-officio members, such as students, to participate.

Discussion: Attached are the applications for appointment received on or before the printing of this agenda packet. The COE received one application for a youth member appointment. The COE met on September 20, 2023, and recommends the appointment of Tucker Graessle.

Fiscal Impact: None.

Attachments:

1. Advisory Group Applications
Report Prepared By: Julia Moss, City Clerk
Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
290
Item 9 C.
291
Item 9 C.

BOARD & COMMISSION

APPOINTMENTS
September 28, 2023 292
Item 9 C.

Background
 Administrative Policy I-38 allows youth participation on City advisory bodies
 All terms are one year, coinciding with school year
 Nonvoting, will not count toward quorum
 Commission on the Environment
 No current Youth Members
 1 application was reviewed in accordance with
Commission Bylaws
293
Item 9 C.

Applicants
 Commission on the Environment
 Tucker Graessle
 COE met on September 20, 2023, and recommends
appointment of youth member, Tucker Graessle
294
Item 9 C.

Recommended Action
 Appoint Tucker Graessle as youth member to
Commission on the Environment for one-year term
295
Item 9 C.