Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Capitola City Council
December 14, 2023

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
December 14, 2023
Body
Capitola City Council
Original file
32.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on mccmeetings.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net. That file is the official record.

REVISED 12/14/2023 4:00 PM
City of Capitola
City Council Meeting Agenda
Thursday, December 14, 2023 – 6:00 PM
City Council Chambers
420 Capitola Avenue, Capitola, CA 95010
Mayor: Margaux Keiser
Vice Mayor: Kristen Brown
Council Members: Yvette Brooks, Joe Clarke, Alexander Pedersen Closed Session – 5 PM
Closed Sessions are not open to the public and held only on specific topics allowed by State Law (noticed below). An announcement regarding the items to be discussed in Closed Session will be made in the City Hall Council Chambers prior to the Closed Session. Members of the public may, at this time, address the City Council on closed session items only. There will be a report of any final decisions in City Council Chambers during the Open Session Meeting.
i. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code § 54957.6) Negotiator: Chloé Woodmansee, Assistant to the City of Manager Employee Organizations: Association of Capitola Employees, Police Officers Association, MidManagement Employees, Confidential Employees, Police Captains, and Management Regular Meeting of the Capitola City Council – 6 PM
All correspondence received prior to 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding a Council Meeting will be distributed to Councilmembers to review prior to the meeting. Information submitted after 5 p.m. on that Wednesday may not have time to reach Councilmembers, nor be read by them prior to consideration of an item.

1. Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance
Council Members Yvette Brooks, Joe Clarke, Alexander Pedersen, Kristen Brown, and Mayor Margaux Keiser.

2. Additions and Deletions to the Agenda

3. Report on Closed Session

4. Additional Materials
Additional information submitted to the City after distribution of the agenda packet.

A. Correspondence Received - Item 8A
B. Correspondence Received - Item 8B
C. Additional Materials - Item 8C - Staff Memorandum on Selection of Consultant for Strategic Planning Agreement

5. Oral Communications by Members of the Public
Oral Communications allows time for members of the Public to address the City Council on any “Consent Item” on tonight’s agenda, or on any topic within the jurisdiction of the City that is not on the “General Government/Public Hearings” section of the Agenda. Members of the public may speak 1 City Council Meeting Agenda – December 14, 2023
City of Capitola Page 2
for up to three minutes, unless otherwise specified by the Mayor. Individuals may not speak more than once during Oral Communications. All speakers must address the entire legislative body and will not be permitted to engage in dialogue. A maximum of 30 minutes is set aside for Oral Communications.

6. Staff / City Council Comments
Comments are limited to three minutes.

7. Consent Items
All items listed as “Consent Items” will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the time the Council votes on the action unless members of the City Council request specific items to be discussed for separate review. Items pulled for separate discussion will be considered following General Government. Note that all Ordinances which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

A. City Council Meeting Minutes
Recommended Action: Approve minutes from the regular meeting on November 21, 2023.

B. City Check Registers
Recommended Action: Approve check registers dated November 17, 2023, November 22, 2023, and December 01, 2023.

C. Interest Rate for Tenant’s Security Deposits
Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution setting the interest rate for tenant’s security deposits for 2024 at zero percent (0%).

D. Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report
Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution adopting the Fiscal Year 2022-23 AB 1600 report.

8. General Government / Public Hearings
All items listed in “General Government / Public Hearings” are intended to provide an opportunity for public discussion of each item listed. The following procedure pertains to each General Government item: 1) Staff explanation; 2) Council questions; 3) Public comment; 4) Council deliberation; 5) Decision.

A. Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety Update
Recommended Action: Receive an update on the Bay Avenue and Hill Street Short-Term Traffic Safety Improvement Project and direct staff to pursue a corridor study.

B. Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
Recommended Action: Provide direction to staff regarding the redesigned wharf entry gate and additional fixtures, authorize approval of two artist contracts, and consider an allocation of additional funding for the Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project (CWEP).

C. Strategic Planning Contract
Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement in an amount not to exceed $50,000 to develop a five-year City of Capitola Strategic Plan.

D. City Council Reorganization for 2024
Recommended Action: Nominate and elect a new Mayor and Vice-Mayor.

9. Adjournment - Adjourn to the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting on January 11, 2024, at 6:00 PM.
2 City Council Meeting Agenda – December 14, 2023
City of Capitola Page 3
_____________________________________________________
How to View the Meeting
Meetings are open to the public for in-person attendance at the Capitola City Council Chambers located at 420 Capitola Avenue, Capitola, California, 95010.

Other ways to Watch:

Spectrum Cable Television channel 8
City of Capitola, California YouTube Channel
To Join Zoom Application or Call in to Zoom:

Meeting
link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83328173113?pwd=aVRwcWN3RU03Zzc2dkNpQzRWVXAydz09 Or dial one of these phone numbers: 1 (669) 900 6833, 1 (408) 638 0968, 1 (346) 248 7799 Meeting ID: 833 2817 3113
Meeting Passcode: 678550
How to Provide Comments to the City Council
Members of the public may provide public comments to the City Council in-person during the meeting.

If you are unable to attend in-person, please email your comments to [email protected] and they will be included as a part of the record for the meeting. Please be aware that the City Council will not accept comments via Zoom.

Notice regarding City Council: The City Council meets on the 2nd and 4th Thursday of each month at 6:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 420 Capitola Avenue, Capitola.

Agenda and Agenda Packet Materials: The City Council Agenda and the complete Agenda Packet are available for review on the City’s website: www.cityofcapitola.org and at Capitola City Hall prior to the meeting. Agendas are also available at the Capitola Post Office located at 826 Bay Avenue Capitola.

Need more information? Contact the City Clerk’s office at 831-475-7300.

Agenda Materials Distributed after Distribution of the Agenda Packet: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5, materials related to an agenda item submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at the Reception Office at City Hall, 420 Capitola Avenue, Capitola, California, during normal business hours.

Americans with Disabilities Act: Disability-related aids or services are available to enable persons with a disability to participate in this meeting consistent with the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Assisted listening devices are available for individuals with hearing impairments at the meeting in the City Council Chambers. Should you require special accommodations to participate in the meeting due to a disability, please contact the City Clerk’s office at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting at 831-475-7300. In an effort to accommodate individuals with environmental sensitivities, attendees are requested to refrain from wearing perfumes and other scented products.

Si desea asistir a esta reunión pública y necesita ayuda - como un intérprete de lenguaje de señas americano, español u otro equipo especial - favor de llamar al Departamento de la Secretaría de la Ciudad al 831-475-7300 al menos tres días antes para que podamos coordinar dicha asistencia especial o envié un correo electrónico a [email protected].

Televised Meetings: City Council meetings are cablecast “Live” on Charter Communications Cable TV Channel 8 and are recorded to be rebroadcasted at 8:00 a.m. on the Wednesday following the meetings and at 1:00 p.m. on Saturday following the first rebroadcast on Community Television of Santa Cruz County (Charter Channel 71 and Comcast Channel 25). Meetings are streamed “Live” on the City’s website at www.cityofcapitola.org by clicking on the Home Page link “Meeting Agendas/Videos.” Archived meetings can be viewed from the website at any time. 3 12/13/23, 11:14 AM Comments on Meeting Regarding Bay and Hill Street Intersection - Gautho, Julia - Outlook about:blank 1/1
Comments on Meeting Regarding Bay and Hill Street Intersection Teresa Green <[email protected]>
Sat 12/9/2023 11:33 AM
To:City Council <[email protected]>;Dally, Andrew ([email protected]) <[email protected]>; Kahn, Jessica <[email protected]>
City Council and Staff Members,
I attended your meeting on November 30th which explained the recommendations for improvements to the intersection of Hill Street and Bay Avenue. Rather than speak at the meeting, I preferred to collect my thoughts and write them to you instead. I have some observations and concerns about the plan presented as I understand it.

I live on Hill Street so I pass through that intersection multiple time a week. I also walk most mornings and cross there at least 3 times a week. So I am very familiar with that intersection and I fully agree that something needs to be done with it. There is a lot going on with cars and bikes and pedestrians converging in that space. Seems like there is a lot of confusion by drivers at the 4 way stop, with multiple lanes of traffic and left turns to consider, and then whether there are pedestrians trying to cross. It is a lot to consider for a driver. I was very disappointed to hear that you could not install crosswalk lights there.

It was not clear to me where exactly the fatal hit and run accident occurred. I have heard it was on Crossroad Loop, but also heard it was on Bay Avenue near Crossroads Loop. My observation is that the woman was not crossing at a crosswalk, and it was 8:30 at night so it was dark. A tragic, poor choice on the victim’s part. That all being said, the presentation did not make it clear what part the Hill/Bay intersection played in the accident and I wonder if you are addressing the correct problem there. Perhaps other approaches might be better and a more thorough analysis of the traffic situation is in order.

As far as the changes being proposed for the intersection, I wonder if the traffic impacts that will result from the change have been detailed out. From what I recall, the plan called for reducing the lanes on Bay Avenue to one lane and a left turn lane (or perhaps just one lane) in each direction. As I come down Hill Street to get on Highway 1, there is often already traffic backed up on Bay to almost Hill Street waiting for the light to change. Same situation with traffic coming off the freeway onto Bay.

Making these one lane would increase the likelihood of this situation, especially on busy weekends.

My other observation is that traffic already avoids the intersections at Bay and Hill, and Bay and Capitola Ave because of the time involved in waiting at the 4 way stops. This is quite obvious during drop-off and pick-up times at New Brighton Middle School. As a result of this, people often detour around those intersections by driving through residential neighborhoods, turning up Rosedale Ave and then onto Hill Street. ( I will remind you that Rosedale and Hill are noted bike roads for kids going to school.) They might even shortcut through Crossroad Loop to avoid the 4-way stop. My concern is that this tendency will only increase with the adoption of the current plan.

While I understand your wish to address this tragic situation quickly, I think a more thought out analysis of overall traffic patterns is needed before implementing a solution that may not be beneficial to overall safety.

Thank you for your consideration,
Teresa J. Green
405 Hill. Street
Capitola, CA
4 Item 4 A.
1 Gautho, Julia
From: Diane Castle <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2023 3:25 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Comments for Dec 14th Meeting, Item 8.A.

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Dear Capitola City Council,
(I had planned to attend this meeting but tested positive for Covid this morning.) A Dec 11th article in the NY Times is very timely given the recent tragedies of one woman's death and another woman's injury from cars driving in Capitola. It addresses the reasons for the uptick in pedestrian deaths by cars after dark, primarily in the U.S. While many factors may come into play, two in particular stand out.

Please see excerpt from the article below (bold type are my highlights):
"...put together, it’s clear that there’s been a particularly American mix of technological and social changes over the past decade and a half. And they have all come on top of a road system and an ingrained culture that prioritizes speed over safety. Whatever has happened over this time has reversed years of progress on daytime pedestrian fatalities, too, leading to a modest increase in deaths. Nighttime, however, has the potential to amplify so many of these new risks.

A transportation system that’s safer by design — as in many European countries — might better absorb any one of these dangers. Distracted drivers are safer at lower speeds. People out at night are safer with well-lit crosswalks.

Even “monster trucks are safe on safer roads,” said Nicholas Ferenchak, a professor at the University of New Mexico and director of the Center for Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety. Now imagine distracted drivers in monster trucks on highspeed roads in the dark" With this information in hand, I am optimistic that Capitola can make changes to help reduce pedestrian fatalities and injuries. A few ideas:
1) We can reduce speed limits (and enforce them), and especially on Bay Street, reduce the lanes in each direction from two to one
2) Be sure pedestrians in crosswalks are more visible at night by adding lighting and other safety features so even distracted drivers cannot miss a pedestrian.
3) Have a city-wide Safe Driving campaign to include watching for pedestrians, attention to speed limits, etc. Advertise using the same across-the-road banners used for events (Surfing Santa,Free Parking).

I hope you will consider these comments. Please take the time to read the full article which has been made available to you, link below.

Thank you,
Diane Castle, 750 47th Avenue Spc 29, Capitola
5 Item 4 A.
2 Full NY Times Article: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/12/11/upshot/nighttimedeaths.html?unlocked_article_code=1.FE0.nbxZ.WN86_NmMA-OQ&smid=url-share 6 Item 4 A.
12/13/23, 11:13 AM Addition to City Council agenda item 8B, December 14, 2023 - Gautho, Julia - Outlook about:blank 1/1
7 Item 4 B.

To: Capitola City Council
From: Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
Re: December 14, 2023, City Council Meeting—agenda item 8B We have identified disparities between our activities and experiences and several details presented in the staff report. This memo is for clarification purposes. Staff references are in plain font in the order they appear, followed by our comments in italics.

1. Table 1. Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project – Cost Estimate A. Entry Gate: “…The CWEP group has refined the RRM design and provided the updated rendering shown below. The updated design includes two wing walls with a donor acknowledgment art feature on the western side (listed as items B and F in the above table).

The updated design includes illuminated glass tops; however, Capitola’s Municipal Code prohibits lighting on the beach beyond the minimum necessary for public safety.” First and foremost, we want to say that we have no ownership of the entry design. The city has sole authority over that. The city engaged RRM Design Group for the project, restricting CWEP from engaging with them during the design phase. CWEP did not refine the design. At the City Manager’s request, CWEP sought pro bono services and identified former Mayor and designer, Dennis Norton, who generously volunteered and submitted designs. The staff report identifies design elements for refinement, but prior to last week’s public notice of the December 14, 2023 City Council Agenda, there had been no staff-to-designer communication. Furthermore, CWEP recently discovered the city enlisted the services of another designer, a decision made without the knowledge of CWEP and Dennis Norton Design, despite our ongoing efforts.

It is crucial to acknowledge and appreciate volunteers, especially professionals like Mr. Norton, yet to our knowledge, there has been no such recognition. Regardless of the next steps, we emphasize the community's strong preference, as demonstrated through extensive outreach, for the wharf to maintain its traditional and Venetian Court-style architecture. We also urge appropriate follow-up with Mr. Norton.

2. B. “Signage Pedestal Art…”
This cost would have covered the installation of mosaic tile work at the base of the viewing stations. However, we have excluded Option B from consideration due to ADA restrictions. This element reduced accessibility for all. Please note: one viewing station will incorporate monochromatic lenses specifically designed to accommodate individuals with visual impairments.

3. D. Historic Sign: “CWEP has secured a private funding source for the Historic Sign. CWEP requests that the design for the sign be integrated into the design work for other signage on the Wharf.”
8 Item 4 B.

CWEP requested the Capitola Historical Museum Board to spearhead this initiative. CWEP is currently not equipped to cover the expenses associated with the signage. We believe it is more fitting for the museum to take ownership of this project.

4. E. Lighting Standards: “CWEP would like the City to use Lumca lighting fixtures for the 10 fixtures on the Wharf. These fixtures differ from the existing lighting as they are affixed to the wharf decking instead of the railing, requiring a more robust installation.

Although the costs for the purchase of the fixtures exceed the estimate, CWEP has expressed its willingness to raise additional funds to cover the additional costs. Funding for installation, including electrical expenses, has not been identified.” Some of the 30-year-old lighting likely sustained storm-related damage and may not comply with current codes. Instead of addressing these safety elements individually, we recommend a comprehensive and uniform replacement.

In pursuit of the most sufficient and sustainable option, CWEP collaborated with a community expert in municipal lighting, who secured a commitment for a potential 25% rate reduction.

Opting for the wharf contractor to bid on the lights without leveraging these professional efforts and cost savings could lead to a substantial cost increase. Standard practices often involve a 20% change order and list pricing, negating the 25% discount we secured through our initial inquiry. We suggest the city explore self-procurement as a fiscally prudent option.

5. I, J, K. Benches, Tables, and Trash Receptacles: “CWEP has requested the City use the Wharf furniture listed in Figure 5. Purchase costs for these selections closely match the estimates outlined in the resolution. If the City Council approves this purchase, the City would use CWEP funds for the furniture; however, costs for installation have not been identified.”
The same principle applies to this item as it does for the lighting fixtures. CWEP has obtained an estimate from the same community member for these items. Opting for another bid from a different source is likely to result in higher costs. Once again, we recommend considering selfprocurement, as noted in comment #4. Images of the features we chose are attached.

6. M. Additional Bike Racks: “CWEP requests the City split the $10,000 cost of additional bike racks. CWEP has not requested a specific fixture for the Bike Racks.” While not initially included in the list of funded items, this item was present on the "unfunded" list. Given the community's growing demand, particularly with the upcoming rail/trail development in Capitola, there is a clear need for bike racks. We wish to collaborate with the city to encourage alternative transportation, reduce automobile usage, and further the goals outlined by the California Coastal Commission for increased public access.

7. The RRM rendering depicted enhancements such as signage, decorative columns, and/or a monument sign at the vehicular entrance to the Wharf at Cliff Drive and Wharf 9 Item 4 B.

Road to improve visibility and guide people to the location. CWEP requests that the City consider implementing these improvements and covering the associated costs entirely.

We support this concept and hope the city will fund it.

8. “…Based on current fundraising efforts, CWEP has requested the City use $75,000 of CWEP funds for a lifeguard storage facility that would be located on the wharf.

However, due to the lack of comprehensive information on the condition of the existing buildings, and the extensive permits required to establish an additional structure on the Wharf, staff proposes to work on the storage facility following the determination about existing wharf structures. The City Council may consider directing staff to hold these funds to pursue a future project.”
Currently, CWEP's available funds would only permit the funding of a lifeguard storage facility once all other designated items have been financially supported. We believe this is an important element as identified by the community and a member of the City Council, and we are supportive of the inclusion.

9. It's important to note that the accompanying table, although serving the purpose of Table 3, was not explicitly labeled, and was inadvertently split across two pages. These estimates were prepared by city staff. This is the list of work we want the city to cover.

Table 3

10. Fiscal Impact: “CWEP’s requests for funds are based on CWEP's estimates of the cost of each component.”
10 Item 4 B.

CWEP would like to clarify that although CWEP shared comprehensive research on pricing for the most cost-effective elements, as approved by city staff, we are NOT involved in determining any finishes, color schedules, or other specifications of any kind. Our role is strictly advisory.

CWEP Summary:

The funds CWEP has raised will complete the vision that has been shared by the community during the past year and will bring renewed economic vitality to the village.

Requested installation of the items being funded by the community would most likely be a cost incurred by the city anyways once a full evaluation of the existing lighting and existing items that are on the Wharf today.

Throughout this process, we have voluntarily and consistently responded to all city requests and acted in good faith, seeking a collaborative partnership with the city to realize the vision shaped by community input over the past year. CWEP remains committed to restoring and enhancing the wharf, building a more vibrant local economy, improving accessibility, providing family-friendly activities with educational components, increasing visitor guidance to the wharf, bolstering alternative transportation through adequate bike storage, and optimizing the safety and longevity of critical infrastructure.

Our community’s generosity will significantly reduce both short and long-term repair and maintenance costs for the city. Considering the outcomes achievable through our campaign, our request for $250,000 in city funds is nominal when contrasted with the financial requirements that would have arisen without our efforts.

We've already raised an impressive $336,000, and our fundraising efforts are still underway.

With a projected goal of $400,000, we're seeking the council's approval for this modest investment considering the larger $8+ million construction project. Our community's generous support makes this request entirely reasonable. Join us in partnership, and together, we will bring our community’s incredible vision to life!”
11 Item 4 B.
12 Item 4 B.
13 Item 4 B.
14 Item 4 B.
1 Gautho, Julia
From: Vicki Guinn <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 4:49 PM
To: City Council; Vicki Guinn
Subject: Public Comment Agenda Item 8B, 12/14 City Council Meeting Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Mayor Margaux Keiser,Vice Mayor Kristen Brown,Council Member Yvette Brooks,Council Member Joe Clarke,Council Member Alexander Pedersen
I wish to express my enthusiastic support for the proposal to allocate additional funding as needed in collaboration with CWEP's community-raised funds for Wharf Enhancements. This proposal aligns with our collective responsibility to enhance public spaces for the benefit of all. Current and future generations. The wharf stands as a vital hub of community interaction, a source of local pride, and a symbol of our heritage. The proposed enhancements promise not only aesthetic improvements but also increased inclusivity benefitting residents and visitors alike. Moreover, such enhancements will attract tourism, boosting our local economy and generating new opportunities for businesses operating in the vicinity.

The collective efforts of our community to raise funds demonstrate the deep commitment and passion we hold for preserving and improving this treasured space. By combining these local resources with city funding, we have a unique opportunity to maximize the impact of these enhancements, ensuring a more vibrant and accessible wharf for all. These enhancements extend beyond beautification. They represent an investment in our community's future, fostering economic growth, tourism, and fostering a stronger sense of community engagement.

I urge the City Council to support this initiative, leveraging the collaborative spirit of our community and allocated city funds in partnership serving as exemplary models of governance and community involvement.

Thank you,
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Vicki Guinn, BIA, CWEP
Asst. Transaction Mgr.

Broker Associate/Realtor
DRE 01077494
David Lyng Real Estate
15 Item 4 B.
2 301 Capitola Ave, Capitola CA 95010
831.475.8111
16 Item 4 B.

Memo
To: City Council
From: Jessica Kahn, Public Works Director
Date: December 14, 2023
Re: Item 8B: Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
This update is intended to provide clarity and address recent developments related to the Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project (CWEP) design, specifically focusing on the entry design and the location of the donor acknowledgment art piece.

Unfortunately, there was miscommunication regarding the entry design for the Wharf Enhancement Project. At this point, the RRM design is the most current graphic representing the proposed look and feel for the entry area. Staff apologizes for any misunderstanding.

The proposed location for the donor acknowledgment art piece has been refined through recent discussions. Staff, in consultation with CWEP, is proposing the donor acknowledgement to be situated just beyond the restroom structure at the base of the wharf.

Considering these updates, staff is seeking feedback from the City Council regarding the proposed design elements at this evening’s City Council meeting.

Any feedback received from the City Council during the December 14th meeting will be incorporated into a refined design. This refined design will be presented to the Planning Commission this winter for their consideration and input.

Attachments:

1. RRM Entry Gate Concept Rendering
Public Works Department
17 Item 4 B.
18 Item 4 B.

Memo
To: City Council
From: Chloé Woodmansee, Assistant to the City Manager
Date: December 13, 2023
Re: Item 8.C: Strategic Planning Contract
On December 11 and 12, 2023, staff and Council Members Brooks and Pedersen conducted interviews with the top-three strategic planning consultant RFP teams. The interview panel recommends BerryDunn as the consultant for this project, based on the firm’s high level of experience, dedication to community outreach, and overall approach to the project.

Staff expects that work on the strategic plan development project will begin early in 2024 and take at least six months from project launch to final plan adoption. The first step after executing the project contract will be a kick-off meeting between City and BerryDunn staff.

Staff will provide a more detailed project timeline, along with the specific expectations of the Council’s involvement in the project, in early 2024.

The updated recommended action for Item 8.C is to authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with BerryDunn in an amount not to exceed $50,000 to develop a five-year City of Capitola strategic plan.

Attachment:

1. BerryDunn Proposal
City Manager Department
19 Item 4 C.
berrydunn.com

PROPOSAL
City of Capitola
Strategic Plan
Development Services
BerryDunn
4722 North 24th Street, Suite 250
Phoenix, AZ 85016
480.482.3002
Seth Hedstrom, Project Principal
[email protected]
Michelle Kennedy, Project
Manager and Lead Facilitator
[email protected]
Proposal Submitted On:

November 10 before 5 p.m.
20 Item 4 C.

Cover Letter 1
Cover Letter
November 10, 2023
City of Capitola
Attention: Chloé Woodmansee, Assistant to the City Manager 420 Capitola Ave
Capitola, CA 95010
Dear Chloé Woodmansee:

On behalf of Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker, LLC (BerryDunn), I am pleased to submit this proposal in response to the City of Capitola’s (the City’s) Request for Proposals (RFP) for Strategic Plan Development services. We have read the City’s request and reviewed its terms, conditions, and the contents presented therein. Our proposal is a firm and irrevocable offer valid for 90 calendar days from the proposal deadline of November 10, 2023.

BerryDunn is a nationally recognized independent management and IT consulting firm, headquartered in Portland, Maine, with eight office locations nationally. Focused on inspiring organizations to transform and innovate, we are a stable and well-established firm that has preserved our core values and reputation for excellence throughout our 49-year history. Our firm’s culture is centered on a deep understanding of our clients’ commitment to serving the public. BerryDunn proudly tailors each of its projects to recognize the work our clients do every day.

From extensive project experience for more than 600 state, local, and quasi-governmental agencies, our team brings valuable perspectives to every engagement. Additionally, our team has prior experience serving state and local government agencies, providing them with an in-depth understanding of government operations, staffing needs, budgetary constraints, and the business processes required to provide necessary services to the internal divisions and the constituents the City serves.

Our firm provides a full range of professional services that support our ability to complete the City’s outlined tasks.

With organizational development as a core tenant of our work, we are pleased to offer the following services to benefit the City:
 Strategic planning
 Community/stakeholder engagement/planning
 Cost of service and financial analysis
 Leadership development
 Executive coaching
 Organizational change management
 Organizational assessment
 Business process improvement
 Performance measurement
 Technology planning
We understand that City Council has requested that City staff research and develop a Strategic Plan to guide Council, staff, and budgetary priorities over a dedicated time frame. We are here to serve you. We have not just served clients like you nationally; but we have also served local clients such as the cities of Menifee, Redlands, and Santa Monica, and Santa Clara County, for their strategic planning needs.

As a principal in and the leader of BerryDunn’s Local Government Practice Group, I can attest to the accuracy of our materials, and I am legally authorized to bind, negotiate, make presentations on behalf of, and commit our firm and our resources. If you have any questions regarding our proposal or updates on the evaluation process, please consider me your primary point of contact and feel free to contact me directly.

Sincerely,

Seth Hedstrom, PMP®, LSSGB, Principal
2211 Congress Street, Portland, ME 04102-1955
t/f: 207-541-2212 | e: [email protected]
21 Item 4 C.

Project Understanding 2
Project Understanding
Named one of Sunset magazine’s “best beach towns,” the City of Capitola sits on the shores of the Pacific Ocean with a breathtaking view of Monterey Bay and boasts of Mediterranean flavor. California’s oldest seaside resort town is located just 35 miles southwest of San José and less than two hours’ drive from San Francisco. The City began as a popular beachfront tourist destination, a place where everyone could come to enjoy beautiful parks and sand beaches. Today, the City maintains those roots and has added a vibrant commercial district and several distinct residential neighborhoods. Nearly 10,000 people call Capitola home, and countless more visit to experience both its natural beauty and other attractions. Many residents and visitors express that “this little town is full of adventure and will make you feel at home immediately.” The City Council has “requested that staff research and develop a Strategic Plan” and are looking for a consultant to support staff in doing so. The City benefits from proactive, goal-oriented leadership who care about the City’s development, growth, and success. As such, the City seeks a qualified consultant to assist in the creation of a high-quality, efficient, and timely City of Capitola Strategic Plan that furthers its mission. This Strategic Plan will be the City’s first and a unique opportunity for the City to look at who it is and who it wants to be.

How BerryDunn Can Help
Our demonstrated commitment to serving clients in the State. Our proposed project manager and lead facilitator, Michelle Kennedy, is based on the West Coast and has led strategic planning projects for the Cities of Redlands and Menifee. Currently, she is serving as project manager and lead facilitator for the City of Santa Monica’s homelessness strategic plan and Santa Clara County’s Consumer and Environmental Protection Agency (CEPA). We have a strong presence and commitment to working with California local governments, and we will use our expansive knowledge and lessons learned from these projects to deliver exceptional services on this engagement.

Our decades of relevant strategic planning experience. We are dedicated to serving the public sector and providing a wide variety of services, informing and enhancing our ability to support our clients with strategic planning initiatives. Our proposed project manager and lead facilitator, Michelle Kennedy, has nearly three decades of strategic planning experience and has facilitated more than 70 strategic planning processes over the course of her career. Her—and others in our proposed project team—broad exposure to the strategic planning process gives us an in-depth understanding of the importance in establishing trust and credibility with stakeholders and effectively engaging said stakeholders in the planning process to build buy-in for a common vision and commitment to action.

Our approach is consensus-based and produces actionable plans. Our approach is based in the Institute of Cultural Affairs’ (ICA) Technology of Participation® (ToP®) facilitation methodology and designed to meet the needs of stakeholders, including elected and appointed officials, managers, frontline staff, and the public. Throughout the process, we will keep stakeholders informed and involved using a variety of innovative engagement strategies. This will help to ensure the City’s strategic planning effort is inclusive of all perspectives and reflects a shared vision.

Our highly skilled project team and their commitment to local government. All our project team members exclusively serve local government clients and the majority have prior experience working in local government organizations prior to joining BerryDunn. Having served dozens of local governments, of all sizes, across the country, our team has a deep understanding of local government organizations, as well as the opportunities and constraints associated with the region’s public-sector landscape. We have experience meeting clients where they are—from cities that are embarking on their first strategic plan to clients who have many years of executing their strategic plans. Collectively, we are well-qualified to support the City as it seeks to improve, transform, and innovate, as well as achieve its desired future state.
22 Item 4 C.

Scope of Work 3
Scope of Work
Our project team will engage the City’s elected and appointed officials, staff, residents, community groups, major employees, key partners, and other stakeholders in ways that will maximize creativity and innovation and inspire collaboration and consensus for achieving its vision. We will help the City develop a strategic plan that can reasonably be implemented with support and commitment from its stakeholders.

A strategic plan is a living document that defines the organization’s reason for being. It establishes a clear and compelling vision; sets measurable objectives and lays out the desired impact on and value added to entire communities—including residents, business, employees, and other stakeholders; and helps set a direction and focus and assists in aligning resources to accomplish strategic objectives.

Having a clear, concrete strategic direction will help keep the City on track and focused on what is important when challenges, setbacks, and unanticipated events occur. It also helps ensure decisions, policies, plans, programs, and processes are designed through the lenses of stewardship of resources, equity, and collective impact.

Encouraging Crossing Boundaries and Strengthening Interdependencies Strategies are themes for action, and successful strategies will often cross organizational and community boundaries and appeal to several environmental factors. We will help stakeholders recognize these interrelationships and critical interdependencies, identifying how they align with overall strategic goals.

Applying Effective Tools
Another key to success is aligning financial resources of the organization with strategic priorities. When groups have difficulty agreeing on priorities or selecting just a few to focus on, we use a cost-benefit scoring sheet that helps the group score the impacts, risks, level of difficulty, and effort for each strategy or objective to determine the ones to prioritize. We can customize this tool for use with the City if the group is having difficulty achieving consensus.

Developing Clear and Compelling Plans That Articulate a Business Case We will write strategic goals, initiatives, and actions in a common language to evoke a clear picture of success to serve as a useful tool for the City’s decision-making. Our project team has facilitated clear, compelling strategic plans for more than 70 public-sector entities and system-level plans involving multiple levels of government, jurisdictions, and agencies. Our clients use these plans to drive budget decisions, execute strategies, and publish the results to communicate with stakeholders and the public.

Effectively Engaging the Public
We will utilize several strategies to effectively engage and collect data and information from the public, including developing communications, conducting interviews and focus groups, and creating an interactive project landing and engagement website via Social Pinpoint.

Social Pinpoint is a customizable community engagement platform that is used to inform stakeholders of project goals, objectives, and progress, and provide opportunities to interact and gather information. This tool has several features that we use frequently and as needed throughout strategic planning projects, such as forums, mapping, an ideas wall, and surveys. It is also important to note that Social Pinpoint is mobile-friendly and has a Google Translate interface.

With this tool, we will easily be able to set up a landing page and sub-pages for the City to capture the culture of the stakeholders it serves—providing opportunities for participants to contribute to the City’s mission, values, vision, and strategic priorities. We will also be able to track analytics and progress in real-time, promote participation, and set up email notifications to help ensure that, even in a remote environment, effective strategic planning and community engagement activities can take place. 23 Item 4 C.

Scope of Work 4
We recently developed fully customized Social Pinpoint sites to support the following clients, as well as others:
 City of Menifee, California  City of Redlands, California Work Plan
Below and on the following pages, we provide details of our work plan to conduct the City’s project effectively and efficiently. We include timeline details in the work plan narrative for further consideration. To be responsive to the City’s page limits, we were high-level with these details. We are happy to discuss our timeline further with the City upon request or during project initiation activities.

Phase 1: Project Planning (four weeks) and Management (ongoing)

1.1 Prepare for and Conduct an Initial Virtual Project Planning Meeting. Upon conducting background research to gain more familiarity with the City, we will conduct initial project planning with the City’s project team to identify project milestones and expectations for stakeholder engagement in the strategic planning process. We will introduce key team members, clarify project goals and objectives, identify known project constraints, and refine dates and/or tasks, as appropriate. We will discuss our approach for managing communications between BerryDunn and the City, as well as our approach to scope, risk, and resource management. We will also review possible formats for the Final City of Capitola Strategic Plan. These discussions will help us to refine our currently proposed Project Work Plan and Schedule.

1.2 Request and Compile Documents and Data. We will request and compile documentation and data to help us better understand the current environment and inform engagement activities.

Examples include:
 Key performance metric data
 Program descriptions and data
 Past internal and external assessments
 Other existing planning and policy documents, organizational charts, staffing, and budgeting details  Data from any previous community and stakeholder engagement efforts that are relevant to development of the Strategic Plan
 Previous surveys of the City’s stakeholders and staff  Demographic, economic, and community data and forecasted trends from the U.S. Census Bureau, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, American Community Survey, U.S. Department of Education, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Opportunity Index, and other state and local data sources
Once provided, we will review the documentation and data to help us produce an Environmental Scan and Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis that will inform engagement activities.

1.3 Develop a Project Work Plan and Schedule. Based on the information gathered from our initial project planning meeting and document and data review activities, as well as from those details enclosed in this proposal, we will develop the Project Work Plan and Schedule, which will outline the tasks and timelines for the strategic planning process. The Project Work Plan and Schedule will also include agreed-upon procedures between BerryDunn and the City related to project control, including quality management and deliverable submission/acceptance management. After providing draft versions of these materials in advance, we will facilitate a videoconference with the City’s project team to review the drafts and solicit feedback. This videoconference will introduce the City’s project team to our document review process and provide an opportunity for the City to share input on a critical step in the process. We will incorporate the City’s feedback and finalize the documentation before distributing it in final form.

Deliverable 1 — Project Work Plan and Schedule
24 Item 4 C.

Scope of Work 5
Phase 1: Project Planning (four weeks) and Management (ongoing)

1.4 Identify Strategic Planning Partners and Participants and Develop a Communications Strategy. We will assist the City in developing a stakeholder engagement list. This will include developing communications and messaging to build awareness for the process, its intended outcomes, and opportunities for stakeholders to get involved, as well as to keep City Council, City staff, and community stakeholders informed about the strategic planning process. It will also include any kickoff presentations for orientation of the City Council and City leadership. We will review messaging and communications with the City’s project team before finalizing and working with the City’s project team to distribute them.

1.5 Develop Questions and Protocols to Guide Stakeholder Interviews. To understand how the City Council, leadership, staff, and other key participants view the current environment and issues of strategic importance—and to gather information for the Environmental Scan—our project team will develop questions to guide individual interviews, surveys, and the strategic planning sessions we facilitate. We will review the questions and protocols with City’s executive team to build consensus and solicit feedback before updating them to final.

Some of the topics we will address are:
 What current and/or emerging trends have the biggest influence on where efforts and resources should be focused?
 What are the potential scenarios that the City should be prepared for in the coming 2, 5, and 10 years?  What is the most pressing problem or concern facing the City?  What is the City’s long-term vision for itself as an organization and the residents and visitors it serves?  What opportunities could more effectively leverage City’s efforts, resources, and capacity to achieve better outcomes?
 What does the City desire to address or accomplish on behalf of its employees, members and, more broadly, the people of Capitola?
 What obstacles or challenges could get in the way of the City successfully pursuing its strategic direction and implementing its plan?
In addition to developing questions and protocols, we will also work with the City’s executive team to schedule and communicate opportunities to involve appropriate groups.

1.6 Conduct Biweekly Project Status Meetings. Our project manager and lead facilitator, Michelle, will conduct Biweekly Project Status Meetings with the City’s project manager on an ongoing basis throughout the strategic planning process. We will use these meetings to describe the activities and accomplishments for the reporting period; plans for the upcoming month; risks or issues encountered during the reporting period; and anticipated problems that might impact project deliverables. We will also use these meetings to highlight any work products and approaches that will contribute to deliverable development.

Deliverable 2 — Biweekly Status Meetings
Phase 2: Develop the Environmental Scan (12 weeks)

2.1 Conduct Interviews with City Stakeholders. We will conduct individual and group interviews and focus groups with City Council, senior leadership, key staff, and community stakeholders, as appropriate, to thoroughly review and assess services and the needs of the community. These interviews will be guided by previously developed questions and protocols. Working with these diverse stakeholder groups, we will help ensure alignment and cohesion for the City’s strategic direction, as well as generate excitement, promote consensus and buy-in, and encourage participation and involvement in the process.

2.2 Develop and Administer the City’s Social Pinpoint Site. We will utilize tools and technology that will help to encourage collaboration with the City and its stakeholders. One of these tools, a virtual engagement 25 Item 4 C.

Scope of Work 6
platform called Social Pinpoint, will be customized to encourage community engagement in the strategic planning process and to gain broad stakeholder input that will be used to inform development of the Final City of Capitola Strategic Plan. We will work in collaboration with the City to help ensure its landing page is built thoughtfully and speaks to its culture. Additionally, within this landing page, City stakeholders will have access to an external survey (can also be used to survey City employees), idea wall, and other engagement tools that will help gather information related to the City’s current environment and the community’s desired vision for the City’s future.

2.3 Review and Analyze City-Provided Documents and Data. We will review and analyze the documents and data requested in Task 1.5. This will be used to help us produce an Initial Environmental Scan and SWOT Analysis that will inform engagement activities.

2.4 Synthesize Information Gathered and Develop an Initial Environmental Scan and SWOT Analysis. We will synthesize information gathered through quantitative and qualitative research, document and data review, Social Pinpoint, employee survey, Budget Book, Comprehensive Plan, department-level plans, Committee and Boards Annual Reports, leadership and stakeholder interviews, and any available performance data to develop an Initial Environmental Scan and SWOT Analysis. The format will be a highly visual and compelling slide deck and will be used to inform the upcoming community forums and strategic planning sessions. The presentation will provide an overview of the City’s current environment; a detailed SWOT Analysis; and discovery outcomes to the City’s project team to solicit input and gain consensus.

2.5 Update the Initial Environmental Scan and SWOT Analysis to Final. We will incorporate community forum outcomes in our Initial Environmental Scan and SWOT Analysis and review it with the City’s project team and City Manager to solicit feedback before updating it to final. The Final Environmental Scan and SWOT Analysis will guide and inform strategic planning sessions, as well as generate excitement for the process among stakeholders, encourage new ideas, and foster a sense of cohesion and optimism for the future. The Final Environmental Scan and SWOT Analysis will also include a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and challenges analysis that will assist in the development of the Final City of Capitola Strategic Plan.

Deliverable 3 — Initial and Final Environmental Scan and SWOT Analysis Phase 3: Develop the Strategic Plan (eight weeks)

3.1 Develop the Meeting Design and Agendas for Strategic Planning Sessions 1 and 2. We will design and develop agendas for Strategic Planning Sessions 1 and 2. Each session’s design and agenda will guide strategic planning progress and will include a presentation of the Final Environmental Scan and SWOT Analysis to provide participants with a shared understanding of the current environment, the trends that are affecting it, opportunities for the future, and key takeaways from engagement activities. Each in-person session will focus on building consensus and refining the strategic priorities identified, as well as the City’s vision and key results. We will review the meeting designs and agendas for each session with the City’s project team before updating them to final.

Deliverable 4 — Plan Development Agendas

3.2 Facilitate Strategic Planning Workshops (On-Site Trip #1). Strategic Planning Session 1 will focus on developing the City’s vision, mission, values, strategic priorities, and goals with the City Council. This session will be guided by the previously developed meeting design and agenda, as well as the Final Environmental Scan and SWOT Analysis. We will use the ICA ToP® facilitation methodology, designed to produce group consensus, to address and resolve any conflicting values or visions. We will document the outcomes of this session to review with the City’s project team and plan for next steps. Strategic Planning Session 2 will be with City leadership and selected key staff, refining City Council’s work, establishing strategic objectives, and performance measures. The Environmental Scan and SWOT Analysis will be presented to provide context, foundation, and shared understanding of the current environment in support of the Strategic Plan. 26 Item 4 C.

Scope of Work 7
Phase 3: Develop the Strategic Plan (eight weeks)

3.3 Develop and Present the Initial City of Capitola Strategic Plan Draft. We will develop the Initial City of Capitola Strategic Plan Draft in an agreed-upon format for the final document. This plan document will include an executive summary, as well as a detailed plan that identifies the City’s shared vision, mission, guiding principles, strategic priorities, goals, objectives, and performance measures.

Deliverable 5 — Initial City of Capitola Strategic Plan Draft

3.4 Facilitate Work Session to Review Draft City of Capitola Strategic Plan. We will review and edit this draft with the City Manager, the City’s project team, key staff and prepare a presentation to present the Initial City of Capitola Strategic Plan Draft to the City Council in a work session. This will serve as an opportunity for the City Council to provide feedback and make any final changes.

3.5 Develop the Final City of Capitola Strategic Plan (On-Site Trip #2). After reviewing the Initial City of Capitola Strategic Plan Draft with the City Council, we will incorporate and Council requested edits and develop a graphically designed, Final City of Capitola Strategic Plan for final approval and adoption. In addition to the content described in Task 3.4, the final document will include a description of the Strategic Plan development process, the plan for progress monitoring and reporting, as well as the development of a onepage "Plan at a Glance" document that can serve as a standalone high-level summary of the Strategic Plan.

The "Plan at a Glance" will follow the design and branding of the full Strategic Plan and include mission and vision statements, guiding principles/values, strategic priorities, strategic goals, and a link to the website where the full plan can be reviewed or downloaded.
(Optional Service) 3.6 Create a Graphically Designed Version of the Strategic Plan. Should the City request, we will develop a graphically designed version of the Final Strategic Plan. This document will reflect the organization’s branding and serve as a public-facing tool.

3.7 Conduct Project Closeout Activities. Once the strategic planning effort is complete, we will perform closeout activities, including providing the City with documentation developed and collected during the process, and conducting lessons learned and knowledge-sharing activities. Conducting this task will equip the City with the tools needed to continue to progress toward its vision and to successfully implement its plan, even after the project is complete.

Deliverable 6 — Final City of Capitola Strategic Plan Draft

27 Item 4 C.

Personnel 8
Personnel
Figure 1 describes the organizational structure of our project team, followed by a listing of project staff.

Figure 1: Project Team Organizational Structure
At BerryDunn, we believe in the synergy that accompanies a team approach. That said, we have carefully assembled a project team with unique and specialized qualifications that coincide with the needs and desired outcomes of the City. These project team members will remain committed, available, and assigned to perform the City’s requested work effort. It should be noted we do not intend to subcontract any portion of the City’s desired scope of work.
28 Item 4 C.

Personnel 9
Project Team Resumes
Below and on the following pages, we list our project team members’ experience, qualifications, and expertise as it relates to projects of this nature and work with comparable public-sector clients.

Seth is a principal and leads BerryDunn’s Local Government Practice Group. He has more than 14 years of experience assisting public-sector clients. His experience includes technology planning, organizational needs assessments, system planning and
procurement, and the implementation of enterprise-wide information systems. Seth often serves in a leadership role on strategic planning projects and manages and oversees project progress and issue escalation and resolution with executive project sponsors.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Strategic Planning: Seth has served as a project principal on dozens of BerryDunn’s strategic planning projects across the country. He has overseen the project management, community engagement, strategic planning, and implementation phases of the strategic planning life cycle for a variety of organizations of different sizes, scopes, and complexities.

Project Management: Seth has served in leadership on most of BerryDunn’s local government strategic planning project. He also has managed system selection and IT strategic planning projects for some of BerryDunn’s largest local government clients. He helps ensure projects are conducted in a high-quality manner, as well as stay on time and on budget.

Operational and Organizational Assessments: Seth has been involved in numerous operational and organizational assessment projects, which involve current environment analysis, future state planning, and the development of an implementation plan for incremental improvements over a multiyear planning horizon to align with client resources.

REPRESENTATIVE CLIENTS
 City of Cooper City, FL
 City of Edgewater, CO
 City of Ennis, TX
 City of Foley, AL
 City of Groveland, FL
 City of Lauderhill, FL
 City of Menifee, CA
 City of Milton, GA
 City of New Braunfels, TX
 City of Redlands, CA
 City of Springfield, MO
 City of St. Charles, IL
 City of Washougal, WA
 City of Waukesha, WI
 City of Wausau, WI
 City of Westminster, CO
 DuPage County, IL
 Jefferson County, WA
 Lake County, IL
 Lancaster County, NE
 Lane County, OR
 Marquette County, MI
 Newton County, GA
 Orange County, NC
 Weld County, CO
Seth Hedstrom,
PMP®, LSSGB
Project Principal | Principal

EDUCATION AND

CERTIFICATIONS
BS, Business Management,
Babson College
Project Management
Professional® (PMP®), Project
Management Institute®
Lean Six Sigma Green Belt
Certified
Diversity and Inclusion
Certificate, Cornell University

MEMBERSHIPS
Associate Member, Government
Finance Officers Association
29 Item 4 C.

Personnel 10
Michelle is a manager in our Local Government Practice Group.

She brings three decades of consulting experience in organizational assessment, stakeholder engagement, strategic and business planning, leadership development and executive coaching, OCM, program evaluation, business process improvement, and
performance measurement. Prior to consulting, Michelle served for 13 years as a senior-level executive in government and higher education.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Strategic Planning: Michelle has developed strategic plans for more than 70 public sector organizations. She actively involves and engages the community, as well as the organization, to gain views for the vision, mission, and goals and helps to prioritize initiatives to yield achievable and measurable outcomes. Most of Michelle’s strategic planning clients have retained her to provide updates.

Organizational Assessments: Michelle is an expert in conducting assessments related to organizational structure and culture, the methods and tools related to the delivery of organizational programs and services, and the culture of the organization. Her reviews also include assessing leadership structures, roles, and styles; methods of knowledge and skill preservation; and succession strategies and plans.

Change Management: Michelle recognizes the importance of change management in all the projects she is involved in. She is well-versed in conducting change readiness assessments, involving key stakeholders in the decision-making process to promote buy-in and build consensus, and actively monitoring project progress to help ensure that resistance is addressed early-on.

REPRESENTATIVE CLIENTS
 City of Beaverton, OR
 City of Cooper City, FL
 City of Creswell, OR
 City of Edgewater, CO
 City of Ennis, TX
 City of Gresham, OR
 City of Groveland, FL
 City of Menifee, CA
 City of Milton, GA
 City of Lauderhill, FL
 City of New Braunfels, TX
 City of Redlands, CA
 City of San José, CA
 City of Santa Monica, CA
 City of Springfield, OR
 City of Washougal, WA
 City of Wausau, WI
 City of Westminster, CO
 DuPage County, IL
 Jefferson County, WA
 Lancaster County, NE
 Lane County, OR
 Lake County, IL
 Marion County, OR
 Marquette County, MI
 McHenry County, IL
 Metro Parks Tacoma, WA
 San Mateo County, CA
 Tompkins County, NY
 Vancouver Housing
Authority, WA
 Washington County, MN
 Weld County, CO
Michelle Kennedy,
Prosci® CCP,
ODCC
Project Manager and Lead
Facilitator | Manager

EDUCATION AND

CERTIFICATIONS
BA, Journalism/Mass
Communication, Iowa State
University
Certified: Hogan Leadership
Assessment System®, Myers
Briggs Type Indicator®, ICA ToP
Facilitation Methodology
Prosci® Certified Change
Practitioner
Organization Development
Certified Consultant (ODCC)

PUBLICATIONS AND

PRESENTATIONS
Presentation at the Oregon
Recreation and Parks
Association (ORPA) Annual
Conference, 2019: Rivers of
Change Oceans of Opportunity:

Planning Your Strategy During
Turbulent Times
Presentation at “Results
Washington” Lean
Transformation Conference,
2018: Transforming the
Municipal Development Review
Process Using Lean Practices
30 Item 4 C.

Personnel 11
Karen is a senior consultant in BerryDunn’s Local Government Practice Group. She is a seasoned public sector leader with 19 years of experience in both small and large local governments. Her time with local government organizations ranges from working with a town of 15,000 residents to playing a key role for the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, which is home to nearly 900,000 residents. She boasts a significant track record of successfully building consensus, solving complex problems, and navigating diverse political environments to implement the policy vision of elected bodies.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Strategic Planning: During Karen’s time with the Town of Davidson, North Carolina, she directed the creation and adoption of the 2020- 2021 two-year strategic plan including managing the biennial town board retreat. While working for the City of Charlottesville, Karen served as the lead budget analyst for the Strategy and Budget Department. In this role, she contributed to the City’s Environmental Focus Area Plan and the Strategic Energy Action Plan.

Organizational Development: As assistant county manager for Gaston County, North Carolina, Karen was a member of the executive leadership team. In this role, she helped rebuild the relationship with a key community non-profit active in child welfare and foster care after years of challenges. She also implemented a change management program to improve workplace culture in the Division of Social Services – Child Welfare Division. Karen reformed the Health & Human Services Division to increase collaboration, promote efficiency, and improve client outcomes.

Financial Management: As a member of the City of Charlotte Strategy and Budget Department, Karen provided operating and capital budget oversight of operating and capital budgets for functions including housing and neighborhoods, code enforcement, solid waste collections and the City’s water/sewer utility. This work included analyzing budgets and personnel requests for appropriate staffing levels, evaluating capital needs, benchmarking city services, and ensuring rates and fees were set to meet cost recovery targets. As assistant town manager for the Town of Davidson, she managed the Town’s $14 million public facilities project as well as $17 million in general obligation bond projects for parks, greenways and transportation. Part of this work led to the Town of Davidson’s first AAA bond rating.

REPRESENTATIVE CLIENTS
 City of Foley, AL
 City of New Braunfels, TX
 DuPage County, IL
 Lake County, IL
 Orange County, NC
 Tompkins County, NY
Karen Whichard,
MPA, Prosci® CCP
Facilitator | Consultant

EDUCATION AND

CERTIFICATIONS
MPA, University of North
Carolina Charlotte
BA, Journalism and Mass
Communication, University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Prosci® Certified Change
Practitioner
31 Item 4 C.

Personnel 12
Maddison Powers
Spencer, MPA,
CAPM®
Research Analyst |
Consultant

EDUCATION AND

CERTIFICATIONS
MPA, Local Government,
University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, School of
Government
BS, Political Science, Northern
Arizona University
Maddison is a consultant in our Local Government Practice Group.

She has firsthand experience serving in the public sector and is familiar with the unique aspects of government operations. Notably, she has been involved in various governmental initiatives, including those related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI); sustainability; and process and project analysis and management. Maddison focuses on assisting public-sector clients with strategic planning by supporting research, current environment assessments, data collection, and facilitating community engagement and outreach. She has served as research analysis and facilitator on many local government strategic planning projects, including for the City of St.

Charles, Illinois and City of Menifee, California.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Local Government: Maddison served as a senior fellow within the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) where she managed recruitment, hiring, and the interview process for two assistant city managers. She also led a leadership development initiative to develop more women leaders in the organization, and she managed an annexation study where she interacted with various stakeholder groups to better understand the implications of service delivery.

Research and Analysis: Maddison is well versed in conducting research and analysis. Notably, she has leveraged survey tools, conducted data analysis, facilitated focus groups, and researched issues of importance to develop recommendations and share findings with organization leadership. As such, her approach is centered on using sound evidence and data to drive decision-making and organizational and operational improvement.

Project Management and Support: Maddison is well-organized and detail-oriented, supporting her in her ability to effectively manage projects and provide support to her colleagues and the clients she serves. She is well versed in documenting outcomes, researching and analyzing documents and data, and managing various priorities to promote success and productivity. In addition, she has experience with scheduling, reporting, and seeking opportunities for business process improvement.

REPRESENTATIVE CLIENTS
 Boulder County, CO
 City of Ennis, TX
 City of Frisco, TX
 City of Menifee, CA
 City of New Braunfels, TX
 City of Peoria, IL
 City of Springfield, MO
 City of St. Charles, IL
 City of Washougal, WA
 City of Waukesha, WI
 City of Wausau, WI
 DuPage County, IL
 Jefferson County, WA
 Lake County, IL
 Lancaster County, NE
 Marquette County, MI
 Newton County, GA
 Tompkins County, NY
 Washington County, MN
 Weld County, CO
32 Item 4 C.

Relevant Experience 13
Relevant Experience
Strategic Planning
Below, we provide a list of clients, but not limited to, for whom our project team members have performed similar services within the last six years. In addition to these projects, we are happy to provide additional information and contact information for any of the projects listed below.  City of Beaverton, OR
 City of Cooper City, FL
 City of Creswell, OR
 City of Edgewater, CO
 City of Ennis, TX
 City of Gresham, OR
 City of Groveland, FL
 City of Lauderhill, FL
 City of Menifee, CA
 City of Milton, GA
 City of New Braunfels, TX
 City of Pensacola, FL
 City of Peoria, IL
 City of Redlands, CA
 City of Santa Monica, CA
 City of Springfield, MO
 City of Springfield, OR
 City of St. Charles, IL
 City of Tacoma, WA
 City of Washougal, WA
 City of Waukesha, WI
 City of Wausau, WI
 City of Westminster, CO
 DuPage County, IL
 Jefferson County, WA
 Lake County, IL
 Lancaster County, NE
 Lane County, OR
 Marquette County, MI
 Metro Parks Tacoma, WA
 Orange County, NC
 Oregon Department of Human
Services
 Oregon Harbor of Hope
 San Mateo County, CA
 Santa Clara County, CA
 St. John’s County, FL
 Summit County, CO
 Tompkins County, NY
 Town of Holliston, MA
 Tualatin Hills Parks and
Recreation District, OR
 Washington County, MN
 Weld County, CO
References
Below and on the following page, we provide reference information for several clients who can speak to the quality and satisfaction we deliver on comparable engagements. In addition to these projects, we are happy to provide additional information and contact information for any of the projects listed above.

City of Washougal, Washington
Dave Scott, City Manager
360-835-8501, ext. 102 | [email protected] BerryDunn was selected by the City of Washougal in April of 2022 to conduct an updated Strategic Plan for the City. As the sun was setting on the City’s last Strategic Plan (2013 – 2023), the City was seeking a new, five-year Strategic Plan that was both strategic and operational and included all parts of the organization.

As a result, BerryDunn set out to assist the City in the development of the following: objectives and goals to support the vision, mission, and core values of the City; strategies and initiatives to achieve those goals; performance metrics and indicators to support and reinforce progress; a process for continual City Council feedback and involvement; a process that keeps staff involved and engaged; policies to support the implementation of the Strategic Plan; and a project management plan inclusive of deliverables, a schedule, and a budget.

City of Redlands, California
Charles Duggan, City Manager
909-798-7510 | [email protected]
Located an hour away from four major cities, the City of Redlands is a big city with a small-town feel.

In 2021, the City contracted BerryDunn to engage its City Council and Senior Management Team in developing a Six-Year Comprehensive Strategic Plan. While the City had identified 10 core values, but lacked an existing 33 Item 4 C.

Fee Schedule 14
strategic plan, which allowed our team to work with the City Council and Senior Management Team to define who the City is and who it wants to be.

City of Gresham, Oregon
Ashley Graff, Assistant to the City Manager
503-618-2297 | [email protected]
The City of Gresham contracted with BerryDunn to support the City’s shift from an annual Council Work Plan to a long-term, thorough strategic plan that sets a course for the future and lays the groundwork for successful implementation. The City envisioned a strategic planning process that would empower its community to articulate its vision for the future, while enabling the Mayor and Council to set strategic priorities and goals. We worked with a subcontracted DEI expert on this initiative to effectively engage the City’s diverse community.

City of Menifee, California
Rebekah Kramer, Assistant to the City Manager
951-723-3765 | [email protected]
BerryDunn is currently assisting the City of Menifee in developing a long-term strategic visioning effort that will establish a set of priorities and objectives for its next five years, inform the development of departmental work plans, and provide implementation guidance. Our approach focuses on engaging and analyzing the City’s internal organization and larger, external community through interviews, research, and community forums. Through these efforts and in partnership with key stakeholders, we will develop a strategic plan and performance monitoring guidance.

Fee Schedule
Our proposed fixed-fee cost to complete the City’s desired project is broken down by phase in Table 1. Our costs are based on our experience conducting projects of similar size and scope, and the assumption that satisfying a deliverable is based on the City’s signed acceptance. That said, the City will not incur any additional costs associated with the process of reaching deliverable acceptance.

We will utilize our hybrid methodologies through collaborative planning with the City to limit travel expense to the City as appropriate.

Table 1: Cost by Project Phase
Phase Fixed-Fee Cost
Phase 1: Project Planning and Management $8,800
Phase 2: Develop the Environmental Scan $13,600
Phase 3: Develop the Strategic Plan $17,300
Total Fixed-Fee Services Cost $39,700
Optional Service: Graphically Designed Version of the Strategic Plan $4,000 Travel expense estimated allocation* $4,800
*This travel expense allocation represents our best estimate to provide a hybrid approach to service delivery. We would be happy to further discuss and refine this estimate with the City. While our services are proposed as a fixed fee, we propose to only invoice the City for actual travel expenses incurred. 34 Item 4 C.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: December 14, 2023
From: City Manager Department
Subject: City Council Meeting Minutes
Recommended Action: Approve minutes from the regular meeting on November 21, 2023.

Background: Attached for Council review and approval are the draft minutes from the regular City Council meeting on November 21, 2023.

Attachments:

1. 11/21/2023 Minutes
Report Prepared By: Julia Gautho, City Clerk
Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
35 Item 7 A.

City of Capitola
City Council Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, November 21, 2023 – 6:00 PM
City Council Chambers
420 Capitola Avenue, Capitola, CA 95010
Mayor: Margaux Keiser
Vice Mayor: Kristen Brown
Council Members: Yvette Brooks, Joe Clarke, Alexander Pedersen Closed Session – 5:45 PM
i. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - LIABILITY CLAIMS (Gov. Code § 54956.95) Christine Lobel, Claim against the City of Capitola
Regular Meeting of the Capitola City Council – 6 PM

1. Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance – The meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM in honor of Debra Towne. In attendance: Council Members Brooks, Clarke, Pedersen, Brown, and Mayor Keiser.

2. Additions and Deletions to the Agenda – Staff proposed removing Item 8D from the Consent Calendar.

3. Presentations
A. Police Chief Dally provided a presentation on Community Emergency Notifications.

4. Report on Closed Session – The City Council met and discussed one item on the Closed Session agenda. No reportable action was taken.

5. Additional Materials
A. Staff provided an updated attachment to Item 8D.

B. On email was received related to Item 8F.

6. Oral Communications by Members of the Public
 Charlotte Linck, resident, voiced concerns about enforcement of the mobile home rent control ordinance.
 Miriam, Vice-President of the Cabrillo Mobile Home Estates Park HOA, voiced concerns about enforcement of the mobile home rent control ordinance.
 Anne Lam, resident, voiced concerns about enforcement of the mobile home rent control ordinance.
 Megan Carol, Volunteer Coordinator from the Santa Cruz County Animal Shelter, shared issues faced by the Animal Shelter.
 Sally, Director of the Cabrillo College Stroke & Disability Learning Center, thanked the City for their support to the Center’s programming.

7. Staff / City Council Comments
36 Item 7 A.

City Council Meeting Minutes – November 21, 2023
City of Capitola Page 2
 Vice Mayor Brown requested that Chief Dally provide a presentation to the City Council at a subsequent meeting on the Animal Shelter JPA and recommended that mobile home residents contact the Community Development Director.
 Council Member Clarke requested that staff put an update on the Hill Street/Bay Avenue intersection on the next City Council meeting. Council Member Pedersen requested that a Bay Avenue Corridor meeting be held as a special meeting. Council Member Brooks agreed with Council Member Clarke to place the Bay Avenue Corridor Traffic Update on the December 14th meeting. Council Member Pedersen requested that public input be accepted and requested that a community workshop be held. City Manager Goldstein suggested opening the ad-hoc committee meeting to the public to allow an opportunity for public participation. The City Council agreed.
 Council Member Brooks reminded the public to apply to participate in Resilient Capitola.  Mayor Keiser reminded the public of the Surfing Santa Event and the Capitola Village Cookie Walk. She also thanked the Police Department for including her in a ride-along.

8. Consent Items
A. City Council Meeting Minutes
Recommended Action: Approved minutes from the regular meeting on November 9, 2023.

B. City Check Registers
Recommended Action: Approved check registers dated October 27 and November 9, 2023.

C. Amendments to Title 2: Administration and Personnel
Recommended Action: Adopted Ordinance No. 1064 of the City of Capitola amending Chapters

2.04 and 2.08 of the Capitola Municipal Code.

D. 2024 Holidays and City Hall Closures
Recommended Action: Adopted Resolution No. 4347 designating the holidays and City Hall closures in calendar year 2024.

Item was pulled from the Consent Calendar by the City Manager and City Council. City Clerk Gautho presented the staff report.

Motion to approve Item 8D with the July 5th City Hall Closure: Council Member Pedersen Seconded: Council Member Clarke
Voting Yea: Council Members Brooks, Clarke, Pedersen, Vice Mayor Brown, Mayor Keiser E. Temporary/Hourly Employee Pay Schedule
Recommended Action: Adopted Resolution No. 4348 amending the temporary/hourly employee pay schedule.

F. Repair of Stockton Avenue Bridge
Recommended Action: Approved the plans, specifications, and construction estimate for the Stockton Avenue Bridge Storm Repair Project; authorized Public Works staff to advertise for construction bids; and authorized Amendment 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Moffatt & Nichol in the amount of $18,500 to complete the necessary approvals for construction for the project.

G. Public Works Equipment Budget Amendment
Recommended Action: Adopted Resolution No. 4349 to amend the FY 2023-24 budget to allow for the purchase of $35,000 of essential lawn mowing equipment from the Equipment Internal Service Fund.

H. Monterey Avenue Park PG&E Easement
37 Item 7 A.

City Council Meeting Minutes – November 21, 2023
City of Capitola Page 3
Recommended Action: Authorized the City Manager to execute an Easement Deed granting Pacific Gas and Electric Company a non-exclusive utility easement for the installation of a gas distribution regulator station on City-owned property located adjacent to Monterey Avenue Park.

I. REAP 2.0 Grant
Recommended Action: 1) Adopted Resolution No. 4350 accepting a funding allocation not to exceed $128,750 in Regional Early Action Planning 2.0 funds from the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments to implement land use strategies within the commercial and mixed-use zoning districts and authorizing the City Manager to enter into agreements and take further actions as may be necessary; and 2) adopted Resolution No. 4351 amending the Fiscal Year 2023-24 adopted budget to appropriate the awarded funds.

Motion to approve Consent Calendar Items 8A-C, 8E-I: Vice Mayor Brown Seconded: Council Member Clarke
Voting Yea: Council Members Brooks, Clarke, Pedersen, Vice Mayor Brown, Mayor Keiser

9. General Government / Public Hearings
A. Voter Polling Contract
Recommended Action: Authorized the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with EMC Research in an amount not to exceed $25,000 to conduct Capitola polling on potential revenue measures to be placed on the 2024 General Election ballot.

Chloe Woodmansee, Assistant to the City Manager, presented the staff report.

Motion to authorize the City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement with the addition of a Spanish polling service: Council Member Brooks Seconded: Council Member Pedersen
Voting Yea: Council Members Brooks, Clarke, Pedersen, Vice Mayor Brown, Mayor Keiser B. 2024 City Council Meeting Schedule
Recommended Action: Adopted Resolution No. 4352 establishing the regular meeting schedule for 2024.

City Clerk Gautho presented the staff report.

Motion to adopt the resolution with Option B: Vice Mayor Brown Seconded: Council Member Brooks
Voting Yea: Council Members Brooks, Clarke, Pedersen, Vice Mayor Brown, Mayor Keiser

10. Adjournment – Adjourned at 7:05 PM to the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting on December 14, 2023, at 6:00 PM.
____________________________
ATTEST: Margaux Keiser, Mayor
____________________________
Julia Gautho, City Clerk
38 Item 7 A.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: December 14, 2023
From: Finance Department
Subject: City Check Registers
Recommended Action: Approve check registers dated November 17, 2023, November 22, 2023, and December 01, 2023.

Account: City Main
Date Starting Check # Ending Check # Payment
Count Amount
11/17/2023 104730 104788 59 $ 192,220.34
11/22/2023 104789 104857 74 $ 285,900.43
12/01/2023 104858 104910 55 $ 276,800.10
The main account check register dated November 09, 2023, ended with check #104729.

Account: Payroll
Date Starting
Check/EFT #
Ending
Check/EFT #
Payment
Count Amount
11/17/2023 23665 23769 105 $ 199,989.21
11/22/2023 - - - -
12/01/2023 23770 23867 98 $ 198,393.88
The payroll account check register dated November 09, 2023, ended with EFT #23664.

Following is a list of payments issued for more than $10,000 and descriptions of the expenditures:

Check/
EFT Issued to Dept Description Amount
104739 Boone Low Ratliff
Architects PW October Community Center Design Services $ 49,383.89 104744 Creative Pultrusions, Inc. PW Wharf SuperPile $ 23,367.07 104746 Dell Marketing LP CM Office 365 Year Subscription $ 22,002.80 104767 Pacific Gas & Electric PW November Monthly Utilities $ 14,228.04 104771 Regional Government
Services Auth CM 2023 Compensation Study Services through 10/31 $ 18,377.50 104797 Burke Williams and
Sorensen LLP CM October Legal Services $ 35,370.99
104825 Soquel Creek Water
District PW November Water & Irrigation Services $ 17,653.28 104834 Wells Fargo Bank Fin October Credit Card Charges $ 32,493.14 104836 Whitlow Concrete Inc PW Install Concrete Stage & Patio $ 20,650.00 39 Item 7 B.
1627 CalPERS Member
Services Division CM PERS Contributions PPE 11/11/23 $ 64,601.90 1628 Employment Development
Department CM State Taxes PPE 11/11/23 $ 11,334.21
1629 Internal Revenue Service CM Federal Taxes & Medicare PPE 11/11/23 $ 37,338.79
104892 RRM Design Group CDD October Capitola Housing
Element Update $ 22,058.75
104894 Santa Cruz County AntiCrime Team PD FY23/24 Operational Expense Contribution $ 17,993.00
104906 Visit Santa Cruz County Fin July – September TMD $ 80,003.91 1632 CalPERS Health Insurance CM December Health Insurance $ 70,064.31 Attachments:

1. 11-17-23 Check Register

2. 11-22-23 Check Register

3. 12-01-23 Check Register
Report Prepared By: Luis Ruiz, Accountant I
Reviewed By: Julia Gautho, City Clerk and Jim Malberg, Finance Director Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
40 Item 7 B.
41 Item 7 B.
42 Item 7 B.
43 Item 7 B.
44 Item 7 B.
45 Item 7 B.
46 Item 7 B.
47 Item 7 B.
48 Item 7 B.
49 Item 7 B.
50 Item 7 B.
51 Item 7 B.
52 Item 7 B.
53 Item 7 B.
54 Item 7 B.
55 Item 7 B.
56 Item 7 B.
57 Item 7 B.
58 Item 7 B.
59 Item 7 B.
60 Item 7 B.
61 Item 7 B.
62 Item 7 B.
63 Item 7 B.
64 Item 7 B.
65 Item 7 B.
66 Item 7 B.
67 Item 7 B.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: December 14, 2023
From: City Manager’s Department
Subject: Interest Rate for Tenant’s Security Deposits
Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution setting the interest rate for tenant’s security deposits for 2024 at zero percent (0%).

Background: The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 804 on February 12, 1998, adding Chapter 5.48 to the Municipal Code requiring interest on security deposits for residential rental properties. Resolution No. 2948 set the interest rate for 1998 at 2%, which became effective March 14, 1998.

It was the City Council’s practice to set its interest rate for tenant security deposits consistent with the amount set by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Cruz County. However, starting in 2011 after the County set the rate at an extremely low level, the City Council determined the administrative burden of computing interest rates of around 0.01% were not worth the minor benefit to renters. For example, 0.01% interest on a $3,000 security deposit would total 30 cents a year. Therefore, the City’s interest rate has been set at 0% since January 2011. A history of interest rates since the adoption of the implementing Ordinance is included with this report as Attachment 1.

Discussion: Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 5.48.025, “On or before December 31 of each year, the City Council shall set the minimum interest rate (for tenant security deposits) for the next calendar year,” the City Council reviews the interest rate and adopts a Resolution setting the rate for the next year.

The County’s Investment Officer has completed a survey of annual simple interest on passbook savings and on December 5, 2023 will be recommending the County Board of Supervisors set the County’s 2024 interest rate for tenants’ security deposits at 0.03%. Staff recommends adopting an interest rate of 0% for the City of Capitola.

Upon adoption of the proposed resolution, staff will publish the attached notice in the Santa Cruz Sentinel and share information regarding the interest rate on our City website and social media pages.

Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact to the City related to this item.

Attachments:

1. Historical Interest Rates

2. Proposed Resolution

3. Notice
Report Prepared By: Julia Gautho, City Clerk
Reviewed By: Jim Malberg, Finance Director
Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
68 Item 7 C.

Revised 11/2/2023
420 Capitola Avenue
Capitola, California 95010
Telephone: (831) 475‐7300
FAX: (831) 479‐8879
Website: www.ci.capitola.ca.us

HISTORY OF
TENANT’S INTEREST ON SECURITY DEPOSITS

FOR RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROPERTIES

ORDINANCES ADOPTED
Ordinance No. 804 was adopted on February 12, 1998, and added Chapter 5.48 to the Municipal Code, requiring interest on security deposits for residential rental properties effective March 14, 1998. Ordinance No. 813 was adopted on December 19, 1999, amending Section 5.48.040 of the Municipal Code regarding Payment of Tenant’s Interest effective January 18, 2000.

RESOLUTION NO. PERCENT EFFECTIVE DATE
Resolution No. 2948 2% March 14, 1998
Resolution No. 3007 2% January 1, 1999
Resolution No. 3067 2% January 1, 2000
Resolution No. 3107 2% January 1, 2001
Resolution No. 3180 1% January 1, 2002
Resolution No. 3258 0.58% January 1, 2003
Resolution No. 3322 0.32% January 1, 2004
Resolution No. 3416 0.32% January 1, 2005
Resolution No. 3510 0.43% January 1, 2006
Resolution No. 3594 0.34% January 1, 2007
Resolution No. 3671 0.31% January 1, 2008
Resolution No. 3731 0.23% January 1, 2009
Resolution No. 3791 0.10% January 1, 2010
Resolution No. 3849 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
January 1, 2011
January 1, 2012
January 1, 2013
January 1, 2014
January 1, 2015
January 1, 2016
January 1, 2017
January 1, 2018
January 1, 2019
Resolution No. 3898 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
January 1, 2012
January 1, 2013
January 1, 2013
January 1, 2014
January 1, 2015
January 1, 2016
January 1, 2017
January 1, 2018
January 1, 2019
Resolution No. 3945 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
January 1, 2013
January 1, 2014
January 1, 2013
January 1, 2014
January 1, 2015
January 1, 2016
January 1, 2017
January 1, 2018
January 1, 2019
Resolution No. 3973 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
January 1, 2014
January 1, 2012
January 1, 2013
January 1, 2014
January 1, 2015
January 1, 2016
January 1, 2017
January 1, 2018
January 1, 2019
Resolution No. 4009 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
January 1, 2015
January 1, 2012
January 1, 2013
January 1, 2014
January 1, 2015
January 1, 2016
January 1, 2017
January 1, 2018
January 1, 2019
Resolution No. 4040 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
January 1, 2016
January 1, 2012
January 1, 2013
January 1, 2014
January 1, 2015
January 1, 2016
January 1, 2017
January 1, 2018
January 1, 2019
Resolution No. 4070 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
January 1, 2017
January 1, 2012
January 1, 2013
January 1, 2014
January 1, 2015
January 1, 2016
January 1, 2017
January 1, 2018
January 1, 2019
Resolution No. 4094 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
January 1, 2018
January 1, 2012
January 1, 2013
January 1, 2014
January 1, 2015
January 1, 2016
January 1, 2017
January 1, 2018
January 1, 2019
Resolution No. 4133 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
January 1, 2019
January 1, 2012
January 1, 2013
January 1, 2014
January 1, 2015
January 1, 2016
January 1, 2017
January 1, 2018
January 1, 2019
Resolution No. 4165 0% January 1, 2020
Resolution No. 4206 0% January 1, 2021
Resolution No. 4241 0% January 1, 2022
Resolution No. 4298 0% January 1, 2023
Proposed Resolution 0% January 1, 2024
69 Item 7 C.
1 RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPITOLA SETTING INTEREST RATE FOR TENANT SECURITY DEPOSITS FOR 2024 AT ZERO PERCENT (0%) IN THE CITY OF CAPITOLA
WHEREAS, Municipal Code Section 5.48.025 directs the City Council to set the minimum annual interest rate for tenant security deposits; and
WHEREAS, the current rate of interest for residential rental security deposits is zero percent (0.00%); and
WHEREAS, the County of Santa Cruz Board of Supervisors, at its meeting held December 6, 2022, voted to set the rate at one-hundredth percent (0.01%) as recommended by the Santa Cruz County Investment Officer. The City expects the County Board of Supervisors will vote to set the 2024 interest rate at .03% on December 5.; and
WHEREAS, it has been the practice of the Capitola City Council to set its interest rate for tenant security deposits consistent with other jurisdictions within the County of Santa Cruz; and NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND by the City Council of the City of Capitola, State of California, that the rate of simple interest payable annually on residential rental security deposits by landlords shall be Zero percent (0%) effective January 1, 2024.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Capitola, California, at its regular meeting held on the 14th day of December, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Mayor
ATTEST:

Julia Gautho, City Clerk
70 Item 7 C.
2 71
Item 7 C.

NOTICE OF CAPITOLA CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION SETTING INTEREST RATE FOR TENANT SECURITY
DEPOSITS IN 2024
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on December 14, 2023, the Capitola City Council adopted a resolution setting a 0% interest rate for tenant security deposits in 2024. A copy of the agenda report and resolution can be found on the City’s website:
https://www.cityofcapitola.org/
The Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting held on December 6, 2022, voted whether to set the rate at 0.01% as recommended by the County’s Investment Officer. In concurrence with the Capitola Municipal Code and past practice, the City Council adopted an interest rate of 0% for 2024.

Should you have any questions regarding this information, please contact staff at 831- 475-7300, extension 228, or via email at [email protected].

Dated: December 15, 2023 Julia Gautho, City Clerk

CITY OF CAPITOLA
420 Capitola Avenue
Capitola, CA 95010
(831) 475-7300
FAX (831) 464-8659
72 Item 7 C.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: December 14, 2023
From: Community Development
Subject: Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report
Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution adopting the Fiscal Year 2022-23 AB 1600 report.

Background: In California, State legislation sets certain legal and procedural parameters for the charging of development impact fees. This legislation was passed as Assembly Bill (AB) 1600 by the California Legislature and is now codified as California Government Code Sections 66000 through 66023 (Mitigation Fee Act). The Mitigation Fee Act requires any local agency that imposes development impact fees to prepare an Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report that provides specific information about those fees. The AB 1600 Report serves as both the annual and five-year report.

The City of Capitola collects affordable housing impact fees, affordable housing in-lieu fees, and tree replacement in-lieu fees which are subject to the AB 1600 reporting requirements.

On November 29, 2023, staff published the City of Capitola’s Annual and Five-Year Assembly Bill 1600 Report for FY 2022-2023 in accordance with the provisions of the California Government Code Section 66006 (b) and 66001 (d).

Discussion: When new development is constructed, or an existing use is changed to a use that has additional impacts on public facilities, the City experiences increased demand for the services and facilities it provides. Impact fees are one-time contributions made by project applicants to offset the impacts that result from their project. Impact fees cannot exceed the reasonable costs to address the proportionate impacts of new development. This means applicants only pay their fair share of necessary upgrades to meet the increased demand that results from their project, and their impact fees cannot be used to address deficiencies that existed before their project. The Mitigation Fee Act regulates impact fees and requires the City to demonstrate the required nexus between the impact of the project on public facilities and the fees charged to the project applicant.

The Mitigation Fee Act imposes certain accounting and reporting requirements with respect to the fees collected. The Mitigation Fee Act also requires any local agency that imposes development impact fees to prepare an annual report and a five-year report that provide specific information about those fees which summarize the fee revenue collected, expenditures made with this fee revenue, fund balances, and plans for future expenditures based upon additional fee collection. In-lieu fees are also included in the AB 1600 report. The attached AB 1600 Report serves both the annual and five-year requirements. Upon adoption, the AB 1600 Report will remain publicly available on the City’s website. Staff will submit the AB 1600 Report to the City Council for adoption on an annual basis.

The City currently has an unexpended balance from housing impact fees, housing in-lieu fees, and tree replacement fees.

Housing Impact Fee: The year-end balance of Housing Impact Fees for FY 2022-23 was $41,240.

Housing In-Lieu Fee: The year-end balance of Housing In-Lieu Fees for FY 2022-23 was $342,666.

During the FY 2023-24 budget cycle, $201,000 of housing in-lieu funds were allocated toward the Pacific Cove Residential Relocation Program loan payoff. There is a remaining unexpended balance of $141,666.
73 Item 7 D.

Housing impact fees and housing in-lieu fees are deposited into the Housing Trust Fund. This special revenue fund can be utilized for the following activities:

1. Creation of new affordable units.

2. Preservation of existing affordable housing (rehabilitation).

3. Assistance with multi-family rehabilitation programs and projects.

4. Conversion of market-rate units to affordable housing units.

5. Construction of affordable accessory dwelling units.

6. Acquisition and rehabilitation of potential limited equity housing cooperatives.

7. First-time homebuyer loans.

8. Predevelopment loans/grants to assist non-profit and for-profit developers with project feasibility studies, site acquisition and preliminary design studies for potential affordable housing projects.

Within the recently adopted Housing Element Update, Capitola has committed to the rehabilitation of 12 low-income units, the rehabilitation of 25 multifamily low-income housing units, and the issuance of five first-time home buyer loans during the next eight years. Within the AB 1600 report, $100,000 is identified for the rehabilitation of low-income units and $100,000 for first-time home buyer loans. Staff will seek grant funds from the state for the rehabilitation of 25 multifamily low-income units.

Tree Replacement In-Lieu Fee: The year-end balance of tree replacement in-lieu fees for FY 2022-23 was $38,442. The funds can be utilized toward the planting and maintenance of trees.

Fiscal Impact: The acceptance of this report has no fiscal impact.

Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. AB 1600 report
Report Prepared By: Katie Herlihy, Community Development Director Reviewed By: Julia Gautho, City Clerk; Sam Zutler, City Attorney Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
74 Item 7 D.

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPITOLA

ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE DEVELOPMENT FEE IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 66001, 66006, AND 66013
WHEREAS, the City of Capitola imposes development fees that are subject to the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code §§ 66000 et seq.): the Housing Impact Fee, the Housing In-Lieu Fee, and the Tree Replanting In-Lieu Fee (collectively Impact Fees); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Sections 66006 and 66013, the City is required to prepare an annual report regarding the collection and use of the Impact Fees within 180 days after the close of each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 66001, the City is required to make findings with respect to any unexpended Impact Fee funds every fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the Impact Fee accounts; and
WHEREAS, Staff has prepared the City of Capitola Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report also known as the Assembly Bill (AB) 1600 Report (Exhibit A), and incorporated by reference; and
WHEREAS, the AB 1600 Report satisfies the reporting requirements stated in Government Code sections 66001, 66006, and 66013; and
WHEREAS, notice was provided to the extent required by Government Code section 66006; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 66006(b)(2), the AB 1600 Report has been made available to the public not less than fifteen (15) days from the date of the next regularly scheduled public meeting. The report has been available for public review at the Clerk’s office and on the City’s website since November 29, 2023; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Capitola that the forgoing recitals are true and correct.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find and adopt as follows:

1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66000 et seq., the City has conducted an annual and five-year review of its Impact Fees and capital infrastructure programs and the Council has reviewed the AB 1600 Report for the Fiscal Year 2022-23 attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is hereby accepted and adopted as the report required pursuant to Government Code sections 66001, 66006, and 66013.

2. The funds have been and shall be used for the purposes stated in said report and are necessary to mitigate impacts resulting from development in the City and there is 75 Item 7 D.
a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees and the type of development project upon which the fee is imposed.

Section 1. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a certified Resolution to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Capitola at its regular meeting held on the 14th day of December, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Margaux Keiser, Mayor
ATTEST: ________________________
Julia Gautho, City Clerk
76 Item 7 D.
4859-7450-3060 v1
City of Capitola
AB 1600 Report
77 Item 7 D.

City of Capitola 0
4859-7450-3060 v1

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
In California, State legislation sets certain legal and procedural parameters for the charging of development impact fees. This legislation was passed as AB1600 by the California Legislature and is now codified as California Government Code Sections 66000 through 66008 (“Mitigation Fee Act”). This State law went into effect on January 1, 1989.

R e q u i r e m e n t s f o r D e v e l o p m e n t I m p a c t F e e R e p o r t i n g The Mitigation Fee Act imposes certain accounting and reporting requirements with respect to the fees collected. The fees must be deposited in a special account to avoid comingling the fees with the City’s other revenues or funds. Interest on each development fee fund or account must be credited to that fund or account and used only for those purposes for which the fees were collected.

The Mitigation Fee Act also requires any local agency that imposes development impact fees to prepare an annual report and a five-year report that provide specific information about those fees. This report serves both of those functions and has been prepared for the City of Capitola for the fiscal year (FY) ended June 30, 2023 in accordance with the provisions of the California Government Code Section 66006 (b) and 66001 (d).

Annual Report
California Government Code Section 66006 (b) requires each local agency that imposes Development Impact Fees under the Mitigation Fee Act to prepare an annual report providing specific information about those fees for the previous fiscal year.

Specifically, Section 66006 (b) requires that for each separate fund, the local agency shall make available to the public the information shown below for the most recent fiscal year. • 66006 (b) (1) (A): A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund. • 66006 (b) (1) (B): The amount of the fees.
• 66006 (b) (1) (C): The beginning (July 1) and ending (June 30) balance of a particular impact fee fund. • 66006 (b) (1) (D): The amount of the fees collected and interest earned by fund. • 66006 (b) (1) (E): An identification of each public improvement upon which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.
• 66006 (b) (1) (F): An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement.
• 66006 (b) (1) (G): A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended; and, in the case of an interfund loan, the terms of the loan, including the repayment schedule for the loan, and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan. • 66006 (b) (1) (H): A summary of any refunds made, and their respective amount, due to sufficient funds being collected to complete financing of scheduled public improvements and the amount of reallocation of funds made due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues exceeding the amount to be refunded.

State law requires the City to prepare and make available to the public the above information within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year. The City Council must review the annual report at a regularly scheduled public meeting not less than fifteen days after the information is made available to the public. This report was filed with the City Clerk’s office and available for public review on November 29, 2023.
78 Item 7 D.

Annual and Five-Year Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
City of Capitola 1
4859-7450-3060 v1
Five-Year Report
California Government Code Section 66001 (d) (1) requires the local agency make all of the following findings every fifth year with respect to that portion of the account remaining unexpended, whether encumbered to a specific project or remaining unencumbered in an impact fee fund.
• 66001 (d) (1) (A): Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put. • 66001 (d) (1) (B): Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and purpose for which it is charged. • 66001 (d) (1) (C): Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements.
• 66001 (d) (1) (D): Designate the approximate dates on which the funding is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
79 Item 7 D.

Annual and Five-Year Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
11/29/23
City of Capitola 2
4859-7450-3060 v1

ANNUAL REPORT
D e s c r i p t i o n o f I m p a c t F e e P r o g r a m s 66006(b)(1)(A) and 66013(d)(1)
The City has 2 development impact fee programs.

1. Affordable Housing Impact Fee (CMC 18.05). Housing development projects creating less than seven for-sale housing units pay an affordable housing impact fee that is used to provide assistance for production of affordable housing units, acquisition of at-risk units, or rehabilitation of affordable housing units for very low, low, and moderate income households.

2. Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fee (CMC 18.02). Residential development projects that are subject to the City’s affordable housing inclusionary requirements may elect to pay affordable housing in-lieu fees, rather than produce the required inclusionary units on site in accordance with the City’s requirements. Affordable housing in-lieu fees are used to assist in the construction of new or the rehabilitation of existing affordable housing units.

3. Tree In-Lieu Fee (CMC 12.12.190). The Tree In-Lieu fee is a fee that the City imposes on residential and nonresidential development in-lieu of planting required trees. The purpose of this fee is to fund the community tree and forest management account, measured by the number of trees required to be planted, to maintain and plant trees for the need created when trees are removed.
80 Item 7 D.

Annual and Five-Year Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
City of Capitola 3
4859-7450-3060 v1
C u r r e n t I m p a c t F e e S c h e d u l e s
66006(b)(1)(B)
Affordable Housing Impact Fee
The Affordable Housing Impact Fee in effect during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023, are presented below in Table 1.

Table 1 Affordable Housing Impact Fee
For sale housing development of six or less units $25 per square foot Rental multi-family $6 per square foot
Addition to housing units of 50% or more $2.50 per square foot 81 Item 7 D.

Annual and Five-Year Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
City of Capitola 4
4859-7450-3060 v1
Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fee
The Affordable Housing in-Lieu Fee in effect during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023, are presented below in Table 2.

Table 2 Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fee
Tree In-Lieu Fee
For sale housing developments of two to six units $25 per square foot For sale housing development of seven or more units Total Units # Units # Units Built
7 1 $0
8-13 1 Total # units minus 7 @ $25
Square foot
14 2 $0
15-20 2 Total # units minus 14 @
$25 Square foot
21 3 $0
22-27 3 Total # units minus 21 @
$25 Square foot
28 4 $0
Rental Multi-Family $6 per square foot
82 Item 7 D.

Annual and Five-Year Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
City of Capitola 5
4859-7450-3060 v1
Tree In-Lieu Fee
The Tree In-Lieu Fee in effect during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023, are presented below in Table 3.

Table 3 Tree In-Lieu Fee
Tree replacement in-lieu fee $600 per tree
83 Item 7 D.

Annual and Five-Year Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
City of Capitola 6
4859-7450-3060 v1
A n n u a l F i n a n c i a l S u m m a r y
Table 4. Annual Financial Summary
Statement of Affordable Housing Fee Program
Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023
Description FY 2022/23

REVENUES
Fees $ 41,240
Interest 0
Total Revenues $ 41,240
Interfund Transfers $0
Interfund Loans Interest rate of loan: 0% $0
Refunds $0
EXPENDITURES -- Capital Improvements Amount Percent
None $0 0%
Total Expenditures $0

REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES $0
Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year $0
Fund Balance, End of Year $41,240
84 Item 7 D.

Annual and Five-Year Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
11/29/23
City of Capitola 7
4859-7450-3060 v1
A n n u a l F i n a n c i a l S u m m a r y
Table 5. Annual Financial Summary
Statement of Affordable Housing In-Lieu Program
Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023
Description FY 2022/23

REVENUES
Fees $ 0
Interest $11,718
Total Revenues $11,718
Interfund Transfers $25,000
Interfund Loans Interest rate of loan: 0% $0
Refunds $0
EXPENDITURES -- Capital Improvements Amount Percent
Pacific Cove Resident Relocation Program $25,000 16%
Total Expenditures $25,000

REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES $11,718
Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year $354,378
Fund Balance, End of Year $342,660
85 Item 7 D.

Annual and Five-Year Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
City of Capitola 8
4859-7450-3060 v1
Table 6. Annual Financial Summary
Statement of Tree In-Lieu Fee Program
Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023
Description FY 2022/23

REVENUES
Fees $5,086
Interest $0
Total Revenues $5,086
Interfund Transfers $0
Interfund Loans Interest rate of loan: 0% $0
Refunds $0
EXPENDITURES -- Capital Improvements Amount Percent
None $0 0%
Total Expenditures $0

REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES $5,086
Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year $33,356
Fund Balance, End of Year $38,442
86 Item 7 D.

Annual and Five-Year Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
City of Capitola 9
4859-7450-3060 v1

FIVE-YEAR REPORT AND FINDINGS
California Government Code Section 66001(d)(1) requires the City to make findings every fifth year with respect to that portion of each impact fee account that remains unexpended, whether encumbered to a specific project or remaining unencumbered in an impact fee fund. As of June 30, 2023, 3 funds have unexpended balances totaling $420,778. Therefore, the City is reporting the following findings relating to each of the fee programs.
• 66001(d)(1)(A): Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put. • 66001(d)(1)(B): Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and purpose for which it is charged.
• 66001(d)(1)(C): Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements.
• 66001(d)(1)(D): Designate the approximate dates on which the funding is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
87 Item 7 D.

Annual and Five-Year Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
City of Capitola 10
4859-7450-3060 v1
A f f o r d a b l e H o u s i n g I m p a c t F e e
• The purpose of the Affordable Housing Impact Fee is to mitigate the impact of new development on the need for affordable housing infrastructure and facilities and to provide affordable housing to serve new growth as the City’s population increases. • There is a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged because the fee does not exceed the reasonable costs of meeting the demand for affordable housing generated by new housing development projects.
• There is an unexpended balance in the Affordable Housing Impact Fee fund, which is expected to be used to fund improvements to housing stock, which will provide affordable housing for Capitola residents.
• The estimated timing and cost of the project are shown below. This project is expected to begin in FY 2024/25. The balance of the project costs is expected to be funded with grants and other revenue.

Table 7: Affordable Housing Impact Fee Project Identification Project Name Estimated Start
Year
Total Project
Cost
% Funded with
Impact Fee
Revenue
Amount funded
with Impact Fee
Revenue
Rehabilitation of
Existing Units occupied
by low income
households
2024/2025 $50,000 33% $50,000
88 Item 7 D.

Annual and Five-Year Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
City of Capitola 11
4859-7450-3060 v1
A f f o r d a b l e H o u s i n g I n - L i e u F e e
• The purpose of the Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fee is to mitigate the impact of new development on the need for affordable housing infrastructure and facilities and to maintain existing and provide new affordable housing to serve new growth as the City’s population increases. • There is a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged because the fee does not exceed the reasonable costs of meeting the demand for affordable housing generated by new housing development projects.
• There is an unexpended balance in the Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fee fund, which is expected to be used to fund improvements to housing stock, which will provide affordable housing for Capitola residents.
• The estimated timing and cost of the project are shown below. This project is expected to begin in FY 2024/25. The balance of the project costs is expected to be funded with grants and other revenue.

Table 7: Affordable Housing Impact Fee Project Identification Project Name Estimated Start
Year
Total Project Cost % Funded with
Impact Fee
Revenue
Amount funded
with Impact Fee
Revenue
Rehabilitation of
Existing Units
occupied by low
income
households
2024/2025 $100,000 66% $100,000
First time
homebuyer
assistance for
Capitola’s
Inclusionary
Units
2024/2025 $50,000 100% $50,000
Pacific Cove
Resident
Relocation
Program
2023/2024 $201,000 30% $201,000
89 Item 7 D.

Annual and Five-Year Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
City of Capitola 12
4859-7450-3060 v1
T r e e I n -L i e u F e e
• The purpose of the Tree In-Lieu Fee is to mitigate the impact of tree removals to accommodate development in the City.
• There is a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged because the fee does not exceed the reasonable costs of meeting the demand for replacing trees removed by new development projects.
• There is an unexpended balance in the Tree In-Lieu Fee fund, which is expected to be used to fund the planting and maintenance of trees.
• The estimated timing and cost of the project are shown below. This project is expected to begin in FY 2023/2024. The balance of the project costs is expected to be funded with grants and other revenue.

Table 8: Tree In-Lieu Fee Project Identification
Project Name Estimated Start
Year
Total Project Cost % Funded with
Impact Fee
Revenue
Amount funded
with Impact Fee
Revenue
Tree planting
and maintenance
on City property
2023/2024 $36,500 100% $36,500
Tree Supply
Program
2024/2025 $2,500 100% $2,500
90 Item 7 D.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: December 14, 2023
From: Public Works Department
Subject: Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety Update Recommended Action: Receive an update on the Bay Avenue and Hill Street Short-Term Traffic Safety Improvement Project and direct staff to pursue a corridor study.

Background: The Bay Avenue and Hill Street (Bay/Hill) intersection is an all-way stop-controlled intersection that provides connectivity to Highway 1 and the Capitola Village. The section of Bay Avenue at this location is a four-lane wide roadway with a center left turn lane. The City has received community feedback regarding concerns about pedestrian safety at the crosswalks. During peak hours, the intersection experiences congestion from heavy vehicle and pedestrian cross traffic due to access to the Nob Hill Plaza, the Rispin Bridge crossing, and the surrounding residential and commercial land uses.

The adopted FY 2023-24 budget allocated $50,000 to make improvements to this intersection.

On September 28, 2023, staff presented various options for the Hill/Bay intersection for City Council consideration. In response, the City Council formed an ad-hoc subcommittee, comprised of Council Members Clarke and Pedersen, to collaborate with staff, gather input from adjacent businesses, and solicit public feedback. The subcommittee's primary goal is to explore short-term solutions and present a comprehensive report to the City Council.

In November, the City amended its contract with Kimley Horn to develop options for a short-term (quickbuild) project, incorporating the outcomes of the ad-hoc subcommittee. The contract also includes an updated traffic analysis for long-term design improvements at the Bay/Hill and Bay Avenue/Capitola Avenue intersections. The subcommittee held a community meeting on November 29 and received public commentary expressing concerns not only about the Bay/Hill intersection, but also about safety and maneuverability along the entire Bay Avenue corridor from the Highway 1 off-ramp to the Capitola Avenue intersection.

Discussion: The proposed timeline outlines key milestones for the project, including community engagement, design refinement, construction, and the potential initiation of the long-term study.

Late December/Early January: Conduct meetings with adjacent businesses and partners, including Bay Avenue Senior Housing, to gather feedback regarding the quick build project.

Mid-January: Refine the design of the quick-build project based on input received during community meetings, addressing concerns and incorporating specific suggestions to enhance effectiveness.

January 25 or February 8: Present the refined design to the City Council for approval before moving forward with the implementation phase.

Spring 2024: Commence construction of the quick-build project.

Winter/Spring 2024: If directed, initiate the evaluation of long-term options for Bay Avenue. This comprehensive study will consider various solutions for the entire corridor, aiming to identify sustainable, long-term improvements.

Summer 2024: Present the findings of the long-term study to the City Council, including evaluation results, potential solutions, and recommendations for the long-term enhancement of Bay Avenue.

Fiscal Impact: The current $50,000 allocation for the short-term quick build project is sufficient for construction and subsequent evaluation of its effectiveness. Additionally, there is sufficient funding in the existing Roundabout Design Project for the expansion of the traffic analysis to include Bay Avenue to the Highway 1 off-ramp and consider active transportation safety improvements on the corridor. Future 91 Item 8 A.
funding needs for construction on Bay Avenue will be determined based on the outcomes of the quick build project and the identification of the specific long-term project.

Environmental Determination: The requested action, providing direction to staff to proceed with developing a quick-build project, is not a project that is subject to environmental review because simply developing a project cannot possibly impact the environment (California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines section 15061). Moreover, staff will return to the City Council with the final design of the quick build project once it is developed. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.

Report Prepared By: Jessica Kahn, Public Works Director Reviewed By: Julia Gautho, City Clerk; Jim Malberg, Finance Director; Samantha Zutler, City Attorney Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
92 Item 8 A.

Bay Avenue and Hill
Street Traffic Safety
Update
City Council
December 14, 2023
93 Item 8 A.

Arterial Roadway
Issues with pedestrian safety
Congestion during peak hours
$50,000 in the FY 2023-24
budget
Background
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
94 Item 8 A.

September
2023
Presentation of
options to City
Council
November
Amendment of
Kimley Horn
contract
November 29
Community
meeting
December 2023
January 2024
Targeted
outreach
Mid-January
Design
refinement
January 25 or
February 8
City Council
approval
Winter/Spring
2024
Begin
evaluation of
long-term
options
Spring 2024
Construct
quick-build
project
Summer 2024
Present
findings of the
long-term
study
Project Timline
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
95 Item 8 A.

AD-HOC SUBCOMMITTEE COMMUNITY MEETING ON
NOVEMBER 29

INPUT FROM ADJACENT

BUSINESSES, INCLUDING BAY

AVENUE SENIOR HOUSING
Community Engagement
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
96 Item 8 A.

Quick Build Project
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
Refining design based on
community input
City Council consideration
early 2024
Construction in Spring 2024
$50,000 budget allocation for
construction and evaluation
97 Item 8 A.

Winter/Spring 2024 if
directed
Bay Avenue – Highway 1 off
ramp to Capitola Avenue
intersection
Sustainable, long-term
improvements
Active transportation safety
improvements
Long-Term Corridor Study
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
98 Item 8 A.

Estimated cost: $50,000
Funding from the existing Roundabout Design
Project
Future funding for construction to be
determined based on project outcomes
Funding for Corridor Study
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
99 Item 8 A.
• December/January outreach
• Early 2024 design approval
• Spring 2024 construction
Quick Build Timeline
• Winter/Spring 2024
• Present findings: Summer 2024
Long-term Corridor Study
Recommendation
Bay Avenue and Hill Street Traffic Safety
100
Item 8 A.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: December 14, 2023
From: Public Works Department
Subject: Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
Recommended Action: Provide direction to staff regarding the redesigned wharf entry gate and additional fixtures, authorize approval of two artist contracts, and consider an allocation of additional funding for the Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project (CWEP).

Background: In conjunction with the Wharf Resiliency and Public Access Improvement Project, a group of dedicated community volunteers has mobilized to raise private donations for the Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project (CWEP), a project that includes aesthetic and materials upgrades.

In May 2023, the City entered into a contract with RRM Design Group to assess and formulate the scope of the CWEP project based on feedback from the community and City Council. A CWEP community meeting took place on June 7 to identify project components. On June 8, the City Council approved an agreement with the Wharf-to-Wharf Race non-profit organization to administer donations for the CWEP fundraising campaign. The agreement stated, in part, that Wharf to Wharf would disburse funds it had raised to the City upon the City’s authorization of a contract or purchase order to complete any or all of the Wharf improvements that were listed in the agreement. On July 27, the City Council directed staff to prepare a final conceptual plan for the project, and on August 24, 2023, adopted Resolution No. 4335 outlining expectations, cost estimates, and the project's scope in collaboration with the CWEP fundraising group.

In July 2023, the City contracted with Cushman Contracting to complete the Wharf Resiliency Project.

Discussion: The CWEP fundraising group has been diligently working to identify the specific elements outlined in Resolution 4335. That list is as follows:

Table 1. Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project – Cost Estimate Component
Funding CWEP
agreed to in
Resolution
Previously
allocated City
Funding
Current
Estimate
A Entry Gate $ 8,000 $ 17,000 $ 70,000
B Signage Pedestal Art $ 30,000 $ 19,000
C Viewing Stations $ 20,000 $ 28,000
D Historic Sign $ 6,000 Privately funded
E Lighting Standards $ 25,500 $ 16,000 $ 80,500
F Donor Feature $ 25,000 $ 22,000
G Fish Station $ 7,000 $ 10,000
H Scavenger hunt $ 6,000 $ 28,000
I Benches* $ 46,500 $ 21,000
J Tables with Shade Structures* $ 30,000 $ 79,000
K Trash Receptacles* $ 22,500
L Water filling station with foot wash* $ 7,000 Not identified Total CWEP Fundraising
Components $ 233,500 $ 54,000 $ 336,500
*these values are not inclusive of installation of individual features 101
Item 8 B.

A. Entry Gate:

In the original Wharf Resiliency Project, the existing wharf entry gate was relocated approximately 15’ inland, but not otherwise modified. The RRM design, included in Attachment 1, would have required the entry gate to be refabricated. The CWEP group has refined the RRM design and provided the updated rendering shown below. The updated design includes two wing walls with a donor acknowledgment art feature on the western side (listed as items B and F in the above table). The updated design includes illuminated glass tops; however, Capitola’s Municipal Code prohibits lighting on the beach beyond the minimum necessary for public safety.

Figure 1. CWEP Entry Gate and Donor Wall Rendering
The Planning Commission’s conditions of approval for the Resiliency Project specify that the entrance gate should be compatible with the historic resource in terms of design, scale, and materials. On December 7, the City received an updated design for the Wharf entry. That same night, staff shared the updated design at the Planning Commission meeting. The Commission viewed these alterations; however, as the item was not included on the agenda, there was no formal review.

The estimated cost for rebuilding the gate (excluding artist components) is $70,000. If the City Council approves CWEP’s requested alterations, the City will use CWEP contributions for the artist-related expenses. Additional funding for the reconstruction of the entry gate, including columns and a security gate, has not been identified.

C. Viewing Stations:

While CWEP is raising funds for the viewing stations, they have proposed that the City install them. The proposed viewing stations include two viewing heads from a single post — one at standard height and another at wheelchair (ADA compliant) height – on the Wharf. The estimated cost to purchase the proposed viewing stations is very close to the estimates outlined above, however, funding for installation has not been identified. 102
Item 8 B.

Figure 2. CWEP-Selected Viewing Stations
D. Historic Sign:

CWEP has secured a private funding source for the Historic Sign. CWEP requests that the design for the sign be integrated into the design work for other signage on the Wharf.

E. Lighting Standards:

CWEP would like the City to use Lumca lighting fixtures for the 10 fixtures on the Wharf. These fixtures differ from the existing lighting as they are affixed to the wharf decking instead of the railing, requiring a more robust installation. Although the costs for the purchase of the fixtures exceed the estimate, CWEP has expressed its willingness to raise additional funds to cover the additional costs. Funding for installation, including electrical expenses, has not been identified. 103
Item 8 B.

Figure 3. Rendering of CWEP-Selected Lighting Fixtures
G. Fish Station:

CWEP is proposing to construct the Fish Station through volunteer efforts. As of now, no plans have been submitted to the City for review. CWEP estimates the costs at $10,000 for this initiative.

No additional funding for this item has been requested.

H. Scavenger Hunt:

A creative scavenger hunt featuring bronze sealife recessed into the Wharf decking is envisioned to engage and educate youth. CWEP would like the City to retain Sean Monaghan of the Bronze Works Fine Arts Foundry as the artist for this work. The estimated costs for the elements on the Wharf decking align closely with the resolution. If the City Council agrees to this revision, the City will use CWEP contributions to pay the artist. CWEP proposes that the City cover the fabrication and installation expenses for additional bronze pieces from Stockton Bridge to the Wharf.

Figure 4. Tilted view of bronze bas-relief Rockfish and installation method I, J, K. Benches, Tables, and Trash Receptacles:

CWEP has requested the City use the Wharf furniture listed in Figure 5. Purchase costs for these selections closely match the estimates outlined in the resolution. If the City Council approves this purchase, the City would use CWEP funds for the furniture; however, costs for installation have not been identified.
104
Item 8 B.

Figure 5. CWEP Selected Furnishings
L. Water Filling and Foot Wash:

At this time there are no specific proposals or funding identified for additional water filling or foot wash stations.

In addition to the refabrication of the entry gate, additional bronze features, and installation costs mentioned above, CWEP requests that the City fund the following additional improvements, which were listed as "unfunded" in the resolution.

Table 2. Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project – Unfunded Items Component Estimated Cost
M Additional Bike Racks $ 10,000
N
Cliff Drive/Wharf Road Entry Pillar and
Paver Improvements $ 25,000
Total Unfunded (proposed by CWEP for
funding) $ 35,000
M. Additional Bike Racks:

CWEP requests the City split the $10,000 cost of additional bike racks. CWEP has not requested a specific fixture for the Bike Racks.

N. Wharf Road Entry Pillar and Paver Improvements:

The RRM rendering depicted enhancements such as signage, decorative columns, and/or a monument sign at the vehicular entrance to the Wharf at Cliff Drive and Wharf Road to improve visibility and guide people to the location. CWEP requests that the City consider implementing these improvements and covering the associated costs entirely.

Based on current fundraising efforts, CWEP has requested the City use $75,000 of CWEP funds for a lifeguard storage facility that would be located on the wharf. However, due to the lack of comprehensive information on the condition of the existing buildings, and the extensive permits required to establish an additional structure on the Wharf, staff proposes to work on the storage facility following the determination about existing wharf structures. The City Council may consider directing staff to hold these funds to pursue a future project.

In summary, the CWEP group is currently requesting the following items be funded by the City:

Component
Current
Estimate
A Entry Gate $ 70,000
H Scavenger hunt (additional) $ 25,000
105
Item 8 B.

M Additional Bike Racks $ 5,000
N
Wharf Road Entry Pillar and Paver
Improvements
$ 25,000
---
Installation of
C, E, I, J, K, L, H (additional)
$ 125,000
Total City Ask $ 250,000
The installation costs are based on preliminary estimates.

Fiscal Impact: The CWEP fundraising group had an initial fundraising target of $250,000 designated specifically for improvements identified in Resolution 4335. CWEP is reporting that they have successfully raised $336,000 in funding to date, with additional pledges pending.

CWEP’s requests for funds are based on CWEP's estimates of the cost of each component. The agreement between the City and Wharf to Wharf and public contracting law requires the City to make the purchases and manage the construction for the project so, ultimately, the City will determine the final costs for the components of the CWEP improvements. All purchases must also comply with the City’s public purchasing ordinance. Funding for items financed by other entities, such as educational interpretive panels, is still pending. At this point, as outlined in the recommendation, staff is requesting the City Council provide feedback on the requests from CWEP. If the City Council would like to move forward with any or all of the requests, staff will use funds from CWEP for those requests, as described above.

The Wharf Resiliency Phase 2 Project is budgeted at $8.9M. Staff was notified that the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) has allocated an additional $500,000 to this project in their FY 2023- 24 Budget, for a total available budget of $9.4M.

The project initially bid at $7.7M. Since beginning construction, staff has executed three change orders to the original agreement with Cushman Contracting, and staff anticipates there will be further change orders. The three executed change orders raised the contract price by approximately 6%, bringing total projected expenditures to $8.2M.

This leaves an unprogrammed project balance of $1.2M, comprised of $750,000 in General Fund and $450,000 in Measure F funds. The rehabilitation of the broken span of the Wharf has not commenced, and there is no estimate for the building rehabilitation expenses or the City's anticipated share of the costs.

Per City Council Resolution 4335, the projected cost for the artistic components requested by CWEP is $70,000. The two artist contract requests fall within the budgetary limits established for this purpose.

Recommendation: In light of the ongoing CWEP project and its integration with the Wharf Resiliency and Public Access Improvement Project, staff is presenting the following recommendations:

1. Redesigned Gate and CWEP Fixtures:

Evaluate the redesigned entry gate proposal and CWEP fixtures for aesthetic and functional alignment with the overall project goals.

2. CWEP Requests for Artistic Components:

The artist components involved in this project require a substantial lead time, estimated to be approximately six months or more after the execution of contracts. To ensure the timely fabrication and installation, aligning with the opening of the Wharf Resiliency and Public Access Improvement Project, staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute contracts with the artists referenced below, in these amounts:

Kathleen Crocetti $41,000
Sean Monaghan $28,000
106
Item 8 B.

3. Allocation of Funds for Additional Items:

Consider allocating funds for extra components, as identified in Table 3, to enhance the overall impact and completeness of the Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project. When the City receives the CWEP funds, the City will use those funds, along with any additionally authorized funds from the City Council, as outlined above.

4. Amendment to Cushman Contract:

If funding additional items, authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Public Works Agreement with Cushman to include provisions and details necessary for the successful purchase and installation of CWEP components, as outlined above.

5. Lifeguard Facility as a Trailing Project:

Consider directing staff to hold $75,000 in CWEP funding to pursue the lifeguard facility as a trailing project after the completion of the Wharf Resiliency Project.

Attachments:

1. Entry Gate Concept Renderings

2. Artist Proposals
Report Prepared By: Jessica Kahn, Public Works Director Reviewed By: Julia Gautho, City Clerk; Samantha Zutler, City Attorney Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
107
Item 8 B.

Entry Gate Concept Renderings
Wharf Resiliency and Public Access Project – Spring 2023 RRM – Summer 2023
108
Item 8 B.

CWEP – Fall 2023
109
Item 8 B.
12/8/2023
1 BRONZE ARTISTIC

FEATURES
Bronze Works
Sean M. Monaghan
24 25
110
Item 8 B.
12/8/2023
2 SAMPLES OF BRONZE SEA LIFE
26 27
111
Item 8 B.
112
Item 8 B.
12/8/2023
1 Community Arts &
Empowerment
Mosaics by Katheen Crocetti,
and some in collaboration with others
Wetlands Watch
10 11
113
Item 8 B.
12/8/2023
2 Dancing Waters
Covid-19 memorial
12 13
114
Item 8 B.
12/8/2023
1 Twin Lakes Whale
Chinese dragon
14 15
115
Item 8 B.
12/8/2023
2 Birds at San Lorenzo Park
Medallions celebrating the dignity of labor
16 17
116
Item 8 B.
12/8/2023
1 San Lorenzo River Walk
18 20
117
Item 8 B.
12/8/2023
2 Ebb & Flow Festival at Tannery Arts Center
San Lorenzo River
https://patch.com/california/santacr
uz/mission-middle-school-studentsmosaics-line-the-soque482c4d546d 21 22
118
Item 8 B.
119
Item 8 B.

Capitola Wharf
Enhancement Project
City Council
December 14, 2023
120
Item 8 B.

Feedback on design and furnishings
Approve artist contracts
Consider authorizing City funding for
design enhancements
Tonight’s Goals
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
121
Item 8 B.
• Expansion and Resiliancy
• Maintenance
• Storm Damage Repair
• Public Access Improvements
Wharf Resiliency and Public Access Project
• Independent Project
• Funded by private donations
• New and upgraded amenities
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
Capitola Wharf Improvements
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
122
Item 8 B.
• Contract with RRM Design Group
• June 7 Community Meeting
• W2W agreement to administer CWEP fundraising
Concept Development – Spring 2023
• Resolution No. 4335
• Final Scope and Cost Estimates
• Projected fundraising - $250,000
Concept Approval – Summer 2023
Background
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
123
Item 8 B.

Capitola Wharf Improvements
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
124
Item 8 B.

Current
Estimate
Previously
allocated City
Funding
Funding CWEP
agreed to in
Resolution
Component
A Entry Gate $ 8,000 $ 17,000 $ 70,000
B Signage Pedestal Art $ 30,000 $ 19,000
C Viewing Stations $ 20,000 $ 28,000
D Historic Sign $ 6,000 Unfunded
E Lighting Standards $ 25,500 $ 16,000 $ 80,500
F Donor Feature $ 25,000 $ 22,000
G Fish Station $ 7,000 $ 10,000
H Scavenger hunt $ 6,000 $ 28,000
$ 79,000
I Benches* $ 46,500 $ 21,000
J Tables with Shade Structures* $ 30,000
K Trash Receptacles* $ 22,500
$ 7,000 Not identified Water filling station with foot
wash* L
$ 233,500 $ 54,000 $ 336,500 Total CWEP Fundraising
Components
Current Cost Estimates
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
125
Item 8 B.

Redesigned Entry Gate
Entry Gate
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
126
Item 8 B.
• Entry Gate and Donor Wall
• $41,000
Mosaic Art by Katheleen Crocetti
Artistic Components
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
127
Item 8 B.
• Scavenger Hunt
• $27,000
Bronze Features by Sean Monaghan
Artistic Components
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
128
Item 8 B.

Artistic Components - Expanded Scope Request
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
129
Item 8 B.

Lighting and Viewing Stations
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
130
Item 8 B.

Fixtures
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
131
Item 8 B.
• $10k estimate
• Desire to construct with volunteer efforts
Fish Station
• Potential for outside funding
Historical Signage
Components
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
132
Item 8 B.

CWEP can
allocate $75,000
Recommend
delaying project
• Unknown existing
building conditions
• Permits required
for a new structure
Lifeguard Storage Facility
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
133
Item 8 B.

Additional Funding Requests
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
134
Item 8 B.

Component Current Estimate
A Entry Gate $ 70,000
H Scavenger hunt (additional) $ 25,000
M Additional Bike Racks $ 5,000
$ 25,000 Wharf Road Entry Pillar and Paver
Improvements N
--- Installation of CWEP Components $ 125,000
Total City Ask $ 250,000
City Funding Request
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
135
Item 8 B.
• Initial target: $250,000; raised $336,000
• City manages construction and determines final costs
• Pending funding for non-CWEP items
CWEP Fundraising and Costs
• Budget: $8.9M; additional $500,000 allocated
• Initial bid: $7.7M; currently estimated at $8.2M
• Repair of broken span has not started
• No estimate for building rehabilitation expenses
Wharf Resiliency Phase 2 Project
• $750,000 General Fund
• $450,000 Measure F
Current Unprogrammed funds
Fiscal Impact
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
136
Item 8 B.

Feedback on entry gate and selected furnishings
Authorize contracts with artists Kathleen Crocetti and Sean Monaghan
Consider allocating funds for extra components
Authorize an amendment to the Cushman Contract
Consider directing staff to hold $75,000 for the lifeguard facility
Recommendations
Capitola Wharf Enhancement Project
137
Item 8 B.

Extra Slides
138
Item 8 B.
139
Item 8 B.
140
Item 8 B.

Redesigned Entry Gate
141
Item 8 B.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: December 14, 2023
From: City Manager Department
Subject: Strategic Planning Contract
Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement in an amount not to exceed $50,000 to develop a five-year City of Capitola Strategic Plan.

Background: During the 2023-24 goal-setting session, the City Council directed staff to develop five, ten, and 15-year strategic goals for the City of Capitola; at that time, staff recommended using a professional consultant to complete this project. The City Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget on June 22, 2023, which included an allocation of $50,000 for developing long-term strategic goals.

On September 14, 2023, the City Council provided feedback on strategic planning and emphasized that the desired outcome of this project is a living document that allows for flexibility and amendments to reflect future Council Members' unique perspectives and goals.

Discussion: On October 20, 2023, staff published a Request for Proposals for developing a strategic plan for the City of Capitola. Seven proposals were received by the November 10, 2023, deadline. After an initial review based on the understanding of project scope, staff experience, and proposed cost, staff selected the top three proposals for interviews.

Staff invited Council Members to participate on the interview panels, due to the level of City Council involvement expected during the strategic planning process. City Council Members Brooks and Pedersen independently volunteered to participate in the interviews. Interviews will be held on December 11 and 12, 2023. Staff will distribute additional material to this agenda with the recommended consultant prior to the December 14 meeting.

Fiscal Impact: The FY 2023-24 Budget allocated $50,000 toward developing long-term strategic goals.

There is sufficient funding for the contract. If future work items are identified throughout the development of the strategic plan, they will need to be budgeted separately.

Report Prepared By: Chloé Woodmansee, Assistant to the City Manager Reviewed By: Julia Gautho, City Clerk
Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
142
Item 8 C.

December 14, 2023
143
Item 8 C.

Background
Council:
• Identified strategy planning as a budget goal/priority • Allocated $50,000 to project in FY 2023-24 Budget
• Reaffirmed staff’s approach to project in September
Staff:
• Published Request for Proposals
• Rated and interviewed potential consultants
144
Item 8 C.

Process
Seven proposals, rated on:
• Understanding of project scope
• Experience
• Cost
Selected top-three for interviews with staff and Council Members Brooks and Pedersen Recommend BerryDunn based on experience, dedication to community outreach / collaboration, overall approach 145
Item 8 C.

Project Scope
Phase 1: Project Planning
• Compile/review information from currently available
• Develop work plan & schedule, etc.

Phase 2: Environmental Scan
• Internal research: interviews with staff, SWOT analysis, halfday visioning workshop with Council • External research: interviews with community stakeholders, online survey, Social Pinpoint site, other outreach
Phase 3: Develop Strategic Plan
• Strategic Planning sessions: 1) mission, vision, priorities, goals & 2) strategic objectives, performance measures
• Final presentation & adoption
146
Item 8 C.

Recommendation
Authorize the City Manager to execute a
Professional Services Agreement with
BerryDunn in an amount not to exceed $50,000
to develop a five-year strategic plan.
147
Item 8 C.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: December 14, 2023
From: City Manager’s Department
Subject: City Council Reorganization for 2024
Recommended Action: Nominate and elect a new Mayor and Vice-Mayor.

Background: Capitola Municipal Code Section 2.04.150 states that each year, the City Council shall select a mayor and vice mayor. During years without a general election, such selection shall be made approximately one year after the prior selection. The last City Council reorganization occurred on December 8, 2022.

California Government Code Section 36802 defines the roles of the Mayor and Vice Mayor (Mayor Pro Tempore): “The mayor shall preside at the meetings of the council. If he or she is absent or unable to act, the mayor pro tempore shall serve until the mayor returns or is able to act. The mayor pro tempore has all of the powers and duties of the mayor.”
The City Council should select a new mayor and vice-mayor by motion. The newly selected mayor will preside over the next scheduled City Council meeting.

Fiscal Impact: None.

Report Prepared By: Julia Gautho, City Clerk
Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
148
Item 8 D.

← All documents from this meeting