Agenda packet — Capitola City Council, November 14, 2024 (part 4 of 4)

The Stockton Avenue Bridge is a cast-in-place concrete continuous 3-span parabolically arched box girder structure with mild reinforcement. The span configuration is an 85-foot center span with two 25-foot cantilevered end spans and two 15-foot-long bin abutments. The two end spans are cantilevered from the concrete piers in Soquel Creek (see Figure 1 for superstructure span configuration) and are separated from a bin abutment at each end. The piers are supported on reinforced concrete pile caps and timber piles. Timber piles at the piers are a combination of vertical piles and longitudinally battered piles. The existing traveled way between curbs is 30 feet.

Figure 1: Upstream Elevation from As-builts
The existing bridge, being supported on the timber piles, as shown on the plans, indicates that all existing piles are installed vertically, with battered piles in the longitudinal direction.

Battered piles are used as a method to provide lateral resistance. If existing wood piles at the creek piers are battered transversely, perhaps as an undocumented late design revision, they could present a construction obstacle for new piles adjacent to the existing piers.

The storms of January 2023 caused a portion of the slope protection and sidewalk at the abutments to crack and potentially collapse into Soquel Creek. The plans developed later that year indicate a repair of the abutment walkway cracking and patching of concrete spalls on the pier walls. Some of those spalls were noted in previous bridge inspection reports. Although the bid documents were issued in October 2023, we have not confirmed if that construction has taken place since cracking was observed in the walkway slab beneath the south abutment. 469
Item 9 A.

Stockton Avenue Bridge
Storm Debris Diversions

Page 3 of 5 ends

CSW/ST2 was contracted by the City to provide alternatives for installation of measures to prevent storm debris accumulation at the Stockton Avenue Bridge. CSW/ST2 has developed five alternatives for consideration:

Alternative 1: Reinforced concrete fin walls upstream at piers Alternative 2: Structural steel debris cages upstream at piers Alternative 3: Extended pile poles in triangular layout upstream at piers Alternative 4: Pre-manufactured floating debris sweeper upstream at piers Alternative 5: Bridge Replacement
All the above alternatives are based on the use of driven cast-in-place steel shell piles in varying configurations.

Biggs Cardosa performed a site visit on March 18, 2024, to observe the existing site conditions.

Based on the photos taken at the time and a review of existing documents, we believe that all options are feasible from a structural perspective. Our structural commentary follows:

ALTERNATIVES
It should be noted that all the alternatives considered above include the installation of piles in Soquel Creek which will require construction operations over the water. Performing this work will require several preparatory steps for operations, permitting, and construction considerations. Some issues that will need to be addressed are:
• Biological and Archeological Studies
• Agency permits based on findings
o Army Corps of Engineers
o Regional Water Quality Control Board
o California Department of Fish and Wildlife
o US Fish and Wildlife
o Possibly Caltrans depending on funding sources
• Construction work windows in the channel (potential multi-year) • Historical structure impacts of proposed construction Alternative 1: Reinforced Concrete Fin Walls upstream at piers Tapered concrete fin walls supported on large diameter cast-in-steel shells with interlocking grade beams. Fin walls are proposed to be independent from the existing bridge and cantilevered from the large diameter piles for out-of-plane seismic forces. This alternative is feasible to construct in a single season. More discussion is merited about the possibility of transversely battered timber piles.
470
Item 9 A.

Stockton Avenue Bridge
Storm Debris Diversions

Page 4 of 5 ends

Alternative 2: Structural Steel Debris Cages upstream at piers Structural steel debris cages supported on large diameter cast-in-steel shells with interlocking grade beams. Debris cages are proposed to be independent from the existing bridge and cantilevered from the large diameter piles for out-of-plane seismic forces. This alternative is more likely to be feasible to construct in a single season because of the ability to prefabricate the cages prior to the construction window. The possibility of transversely battered timber piles is less of a concern with this system as the pile configuration avoids likely locations for existing battered piles.

Alternative 3: Extended Pile Poles in triangular layout upstream at piers Extended pile poles supported on large diameter cast-in-steel shells with interlocking grade beams. It is likely that steel shell pile extensions or cast-in-place pole extensions may be preferable to embedded steel sections. This alternative is feasible to construct in a single season.

While this pile layout is less likely for potential pile conflicts it is not as favorable as Alternative 2.

More discussion is merited about the possibility of transversely battered timber piles.

Alternative 4: Pre-manufactured Floating Debris Sweeper upstream at piers Use of a pre-manufactured spinning debris sweeper supported on large diameter cast-in-steel shells. The debris sweeper assemblies are proposed to be independent from the existing bridge and cantilevered from a large diameter pile for operational and seismic forces. This alternative is feasible to construct in a single season as there are fewer piles and the main sweeper is prefabricated. More discussion is merited about the possibility of transversely battered timber piles. A sweeper of this type may be difficult to obtain.

Alternative 5: Bridge Replacement
The bridge replacement option is a viable option for debris mitigation as the proposed bridge structure clear spans the creek, eliminating the two piers in the water and creating a more favorable hydraulic channel. In addition, the Stockton Bridge is a critical link for emergency services / response for the coastal community. The closest alternative crossing of Soquel Creek is Highway 1. The existing bridge is 90 years old and highly likely to be seismically deficient.

The bridge sufficiency rating from Caltrans Inspection Reports is 60.6. That rating would likely qualify for rehabilitation funding assistance, but additional studies would need to be performed for replacement funding assistance. The deck rating is poor due to excessive transverse cracking, but the overall superstructure is rated as fair. No observation of the interior of the box girder was performed for these ratings. If the manhole lids were all removed, a structural observation could verify if there is any sign of interior concrete degradation that might lower the sufficiency rating.
471
Item 9 A.

Stockton Avenue Bridge
Storm Debris Diversions

Page 5 of 5 ends

The most recent Bridge Inspection Report lists the Stockton Avenue Bridge in Historic Bridge Inventory Historic Status Category 2; eligible for the office list of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). This means that that the bridge has been determined eligible as a result of the historic bridge inventory and subsequent updates. Caltrans will need to be contacted to obtain additional information about the Historic Bridge Rating Sheet from the Office of Historic Preservation or sometimes on request from the Cultural Studies Office. There is a multi-step process through Caltrans to determine how the historic nature of the structure affects replacement and what features may be necessary for the new design.

A new replacement structure could be configured so that the new clear span structure would mimic the existing historic character of the bridge, incorporating such features as:
• Arched bridge soffit
• Historic railing Features
• Art Deco lighting support pedestals
• Art Deco approach pedestals at abutments
There are several design hurdles to overcome for the replacement option such as:
• Environmental and permitting studies
• Multi-season construction period
• Demolition and construction activities in the creek channel • Caltrans review and coordination
• Historical structure issues
• Community involvement
• Traffic handling and stage construction
• Utilities in the existing bridge
• Abutment replacements
• Bridge hydrology report
• Geotechnical borings and report

CONCLUSIONS
All of the alternatives considered are structurally feasible. Depending on additional consideration of the potential of transversely battered piles, some are preferable to others. If transversely battered piles do not exist at the piers, then Alternative 4 is likely the most economical option structurally. Alternative 3 would be another cost-effective option. If it is determined that the risk of battered piles is too high, then Alternative 2 would be the most economical option, followed by a reconfigured Alternative 3. Alternative 1 would have the most construction and cost challenges of the retrofit options. Alternative 5, the full replacement option extends the expected life span of the bridge another 75 years and eliminates the storm debris obstacles. The replacement option would be a much lengthier design and construction process as well as the costliest option.
472
Item 9 A.

Stockton Avenue Bridge – Bridge Pier Debris Mitigation Feasibility Report CSWST2 |
Appendix F – Program Level Cost Estimates

473
Item 9 A.

Stockton Avenue Bridge Debris Mitigation Measure - Debris Diversion Fin Program Level Cost Estimate

06.21.2024
UNIT
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT COST CONT AMOUNT
101 Mobilization/ Demobilization 1 LS $110,310 $110,310 102 Traffic Management 1 LS 56,000.00$ 10% $61,600
103 Jobsite Fencing and Gates on Land 100 LF 50.00$ 25% $6,250 104 Jobsite Fencing in Water/On Cofferdam 200 LF 75.00$ 25% $18,750 105 Bridge Protection 30 LF 500.00$ 25% $18,750
106 Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS 15,000.00$ 10% $16,500 107 Construction Layout 1 LS 20,000.00$ 10% $22,000
108 Environmental Monitoring 1 LS 70,000.00$ 10% $77,000 109 Coffer Dam 2 EA $ 70,000.00 25% $175,000
110 Dewatering 1 LS $ 60,000.00 25% $75,000
111 Access Bridges and Scaffolding 1 LS $ 150,000.00 25% $187,500 112 Concrete Formwork 1,120 SF $ 15.00 25% $21,000
113 Reinforced Concrete Footing 120 SF 425.00$ 25% $63,750 114 Reinforced Concrete Fin Wall 280 SF 350.00$ 25% $122,500 115 Reinforced Concrete Pier 8 EA 20,000.00$ 25% $200,000 116 Pump House Removal 1 LS 30,000.00$ 25% $37,500
$1,213,000
Notes
$100,000
$37,843
$181,950
$1,532,793
$1,640,000

3. Assumes 25' Pier length. $1,755,000
Prepared by: J Harberson
Checked by : K Pillsbury CLASS 5 ESTIMATE
Planning and CEQA
Total Construction Cost:

Recommended Budget $1,600,000 to $1,800,000
Final Design
Construction Management
Total Cost (2024 Dollars)
Total Cost (2025 Dollars)
Total Cost (2026 Dollars)
Assumes two (2) debris fins installed
over a construction period of 30 days.

1. Assumes height of fin walls is 14' tall and
12" width. 2.
474
Item 9 A.
1 inch = 10 ft.
10 8.6±'

ANGLE FIN TO MINIMIZE
DEBRIS CATCH BETWEENPIER AND CREEK WALL.

SOQUEL CREEK

FLOW DIRECTION

CREEK WALL CREEK WALL

EDGE EXISTINGBRIDGE DECK

SOQUEL CREEK

FLOW DIRECTION

TO PACIFIC OCEAN

CREEK WALL CREEK WALL

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

CREEK WALLCONTINUES

UNDER BRIDGE

PIERUNDER BRIDGE

S T O C K T O N A V E

PIERUNDER BRIDGE

91.3±'

79.8±'

26.0±'
20'
20'
FOOTING, TYP.

FIN, TYP.

PIER, TYP.

22.4±'
100±LF COFFERDAM
100±LF COFFERDAM
10±LF BRIDGE PROTECTION + COFFERDAM 10±LF BRIDGE PROTECTION + COFFERDAM BRIDGE.

GAP IS ABOUT 2'

AS SHOWN

STAIRS ANDSCAFFOLDING
INSIDE

STAIRS ANDSCAFFOLDING
INSIDE
BRIDGE.

GAP IS ABOUT 15'ON WIDE SIDE

AS SHOWN

FENCING INTEGRAL

WITH COFFERDAM
30±LF

FENCING

AND GATE
GATE
55±LF

FENCING

AND GATE

ON LAND
75±LF

FENCING INTEGRAL

WITH COFFERDAM
10±LF
WALL PROTECTION + COFFERDAM
85'

CENTERLINE PIER TO CENTERLINE PIER
&

CENTERLINE END FIN TO CENTERLINE END FIN PIER UNDER
BRIDGE

PIER UNDERBRIDGE

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

APPROXIMATE LOCATION

OF EXISTING CREEK WALL

UNDER BRIDGE

REINFORCED
CONCRETE PIER, TYP.

REINFORCED

CONCRETE
FOOTING, TYP.

REINFORCED

CONCRETE
FIN WALL, TYP.

ANGLE FIN TO MINIMIZE
DEBRIS CATCH BETWEENPIER AND CREEK WALL.

EXISTING
TIMBER PILES, TYP.
25' 25'

PIER FOOTING,
TYP.
20'

PIER UNDERBRIDGE

REINFORCED
CONCRETE PIER, TYP.

REINFORCED

CONCRETE
FOOTING, TYP.

REINFORCED

CONCRETE
FIN WALL, TYP.

EXISTING
TIMBER PILES, TYP.
(DIAGRAMMATICALLY
SHOWN)

CONCRETE FIN

WALL AND FOUNDATION
BEYOND IN DASHED, TYP..

PIER FOOTING

SOQUEL CREEK

FLOW DIRECTION

APPROXIMATE

CREEK BOTTOM
SDA1
DEBRIS DIVERSION FIN - XX/XX/XX XXX XXX XXX XXX 1" = X' P:\Shared\Projects\2023\2300338 Capitola Stockton Bridge Replacement\DWG\Exhibits\Cost Estimate Exhibits.dwg 06/21/2024 - 01:24 PM nankk 1:1 Sheet Plan File: Project Number: 2300338 Prepared Under the Direction of: CITY OF CAPITOLA STOCKTON AVENUE BRIDGE MITIGATION State County City California Santa Cruz Capitola
Rev Date Description Designed Drawn Checked
Scale:

Date: 04/18/2024
303 TWIN DOLPHIN DRIVE
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
©2024
ENGINEERING | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
SURVEYING | URBAN PLANNING
415.883.9850
WWW.CSWST2.COM

SCHEMATIC DESIGN ALTERNATIVE
PLAN

UPSTREAM ELEVATION WESTWARD ELEVATION
SCALE: 1"=10'SCALE: 1"=10' SCALE: 1"=10'
475
Item 9 A.

Stockton Avenue Bridge Debris Mitigation Measure - Debris Diversion Cage Program Level Cost Estimate

06.21.2024
UNIT
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT COST CONT AMOUNT
101 Mobilization/ Demobilization 1 LS $97,440 $97,440
102 Traffic Management 1 LS 46,500.00$ 10% $51,150
103 Jobsite Fencing and Gates on Land 100 LF 50.00$ 25% $6,250 104 Jobsite Fencing in Water/On Cofferdam 200 LF 75.00$ 25% $18,750 105 Bridge Protection 30 LF 500.00$ 25% $18,750
106 Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS 15,000.00$ 10% $16,500 107 Construction Layout 1 LS 20,000.00$ 10% $22,000
108 Environmental Monitoring 1 LS 60,000.00$ 10% $66,000 109 Coffer Dam 2 EA $ 70,000.00 25% $175,000
110 Dewatering 1 LS $ 60,000.00 25% $75,000
111 Access Bridges and Scaffolding 1 LS $ 150,000.00 25% $187,500 112 Debris Diversion Cage 2 EA 60,000.00$ 25% $150,000
113 Reinforced Concrete Pier 6 EA 20,000.00$ 25% $150,000 114 Pump House Removal 1 LS 30,000.00$ 25% $37,500
$1,072,000
Notes
$100,000
$37,843
$160,800

2. Assumes 25' Pier length. $1,370,643
$1,467,000
$1,570,000
Prepared by: J Harberson
Checked by : K Pillsbury CLASS 5 ESTIMATE
Planning and CEQA
Total Construction Cost:

Recommended Budget $1,400,000 to $1,600,000
Final Design
Construction Management
Total Cost (2024 Dollars)
Total Cost (2025 Dollars)
Total Cost (2026 Dollars)
Assumes two (2) debris cages installed
over a construction period of 25 days.

1. 476
Item 9 A.
1 inch = 10 ft.
10 76±'

S T O C K T O N A V E

SOQUEL CREEK

FLOW DIRECTION

CREEK WALL CREEK WALL

EDGE EXISTING BRIDGE DECK

EDGE EXISTINGBRIDGE DECK

SOQUEL CREEK

FLOW DIRECTION

TO PACIFIC OCEAN

CREEK WALL CREEK WALL

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

CREEK WALLCONTINUES

UNDER BRIDGE

PIERUNDER BRIDGE

PIERUNDER BRIDGE
7 84.5±' .8±' 26.9±'

8.9'
TYP.

23.8 ±'
TYP
.

DEBRIS DEFLECTOR CAGE FRAME, TYP.

6.6±' 20.8±'
25' 85' 25'
105±LF COFFERDAM
100±LF COFFERDAM
10±LF BRIDGE PROTECTION + COFFERDAM 10±LF BRIDGE PROTECTION + COFFERDAM BRIDGE.

GAP IS ABOUT 2'

AS SHOWN STAIRS AND

SCAFFOLDING
INSIDE

STAIRS ANDSCAFFOLDING
INSIDE
BRIDGE.

GAP IS ABOUT 15'ON WIDE SIDE

AS SHOWN

FENCING INTEGRAL

WITH COFFERDAM
30±LF

FENCING

AND GATE
GATE
50±LF

FENCING

AND GATE

ON LAND
85±LF

FENCING INTEGRAL

WITH COFFERDAM
85'

CENTERLINE PIER TO CENTERLINE PIER
&

CENTERLINE DEBRIS CAGE TO CENTERLINE DEBRIS CAGE PIER UNDER BRIDGE PIER UNDER BRIDGE

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

APPROXIMATE LOCATION

OF EXISTING CREEK WALL

UNDER BRIDGE

REINFORCED
CONCRETE PIERS, TYP.

EXISTING
TIMBER PILES, TYP.
25' 25'
DEBRIS DEFLECTOR CAGE FRAME:

WELDED 6"x6" GALVANIZED
STEEL SQUARE BAR, TYP.

22.3'±

PIER UNDERBRIDGE

REINFORCED
CONCRETE PIER, TYP.

GALVANIZED STEEL

POST EMBEDDED IN
CONCRETE PIER.

EXISTING
TIMBER PILES, TYP.
(DIAGRAMMATICALLY
SHOWN)

PIER FOOTING

SOQUEL CREEK

FLOW DIRECTION

APPROXIMATE

CREEK BOTTOM
DEBRIS DEFLECTOR CAGE FRAME:

WELDED 6"x6" GALVANIZED STEEL SQUARE BAR

10.5±'

23.8±'
SDA2 - XX/XX/XX XXX XXX XXX XXX 1" = X'
P:\Shared\Projects\2023\2300338 Capitola Stockton Bridge Replacement\DWG\Exhibits\Cost Estimate Exhibits.dwg 06/21/2024 - 01:26 PM nankk 1:1 Sheet Plan File: Project Number: 2300338 Prepared Under the Direction of: CITY OF CAPITOLA STOCKTON AVENUE BRIDGE MITIGATION State County City California Santa Cruz Capitola
Rev Date Description Designed Drawn Checked
Scale:

Date: 04/18/2024
303 TWIN DOLPHIN DRIVE
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
©2024
ENGINEERING | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
SURVEYING | URBAN PLANNING
415.883.9850
WWW.CSWST2.COM

DEBRIS DIVERSION CAGE

SCHEMATIC DESIGN ALTERNATIVE
PLAN

UPSTREAM ELEVATION WESTWARD ELEVATION
SCALE: 1"=10'SCALE: 1"=10' SCALE: 1"=10'
477
Item 9 A.

Stockton Avenue Bridge Debris Mitigation Measure - Debris Diversion Piers Program Level Cost Estimate

06.21.2024
UNIT
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT COST CONT AMOUNT
101 Mobilization/ Demobilization 1 LS $149,940 $149,940 102 Traffic Management 1 LS 46,500.00$ 10% $51,150
103 Jobsite Fencing and Gates on Land 100 LF 50.00$ 25% $6,250 104 Jobsite Fencing in Water/On Cofferdam 200 LF 75.00$ 25% $18,750 105 Bridge Protection 30 LF 500.00$ 25% $18,750
106 Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS 15,000.00$ 10% $16,500 107 Construction Layout 1 LS 20,000.00$ 10% $22,000
108 Environmental Monitoring 1 LS 60,000.00$ 10% $66,000 109 Coffer Dam 2 EA $ 70,000.00 25% $175,000
110 Dewatering 1 LS $ 60,000.00 25% $75,000
111 Access Bridges and Scaffolding 1 LS $ 150,000.00 25% $187,500 112 Steel Bollards 22 EA $ 5,000.00 25% $137,500
113 Reinforced Concrete Pier 22 EA 25,000.00$ 25% $687,500 114 Pump House Removal 1 LS 30,000.00$ 25% $37,500
$1,649,000
Notes
$100,000
$37,843
$247,350

2. Assumes 25' Pier embedment length. $2,034,193
$2,177,000
$2,329,000
Prepared by: J Harberson
Checked by : K Pillsbury CLASS 5 ESTIMATE
Planning and CEQA
Total Construction Cost:

Recommended Budget $2,100,000 to $2,400,000
Final Design
Construction Management
Total Cost (2024 Dollars)
Total Cost (2025 Dollars)
Total Cost (2026 Dollars)
Assumes 22 debris diversion piers
installed over a construction period of
25 days.

1. Assume Concrete Filled Galvanzied Steel
Bollards.

3. 478
Item 9 A.
1 inch = 10 ft.
10 85±'

S T O C K T O N A V E

SOQUEL CREEK

FLOW DIRECTION

CREEK WALL CREEK WALL

EDGE EXISTINGBRIDGE DECK

SOQUEL CREEK

FLOW DIRECTION

TO PACIFIC OCEAN

CREEK WALL CREEK WALL

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

CREEK WALLCONTINUES

UNDER BRIDGE

PIERUNDER BRIDGE

7.6±' 27.0±'
FOOTING AS NEEDED, TYP.
25'±
TYP.

20.9±'

6.7±'

76.5±'

8.5±'
CONCRETE PIER, TYP.

GALVANIZED STEEL PIER POLE, TYP.
25' 25' 85'
105±LF COFFERDAM
100±LF COFFERDAM
10±LF BRIDGE PROTECTION + COFFERDAM 10±LF BRIDGE PROTECTION + COFFERDAM BRIDGE.

GAP IS ABOUT 2'

AS SHOWN STAIRS AND

SCAFFOLDING
INSIDE

STAIRS ANDSCAFFOLDING
INSIDE
BRIDGE.

GAP IS ABOUT 15'ON WIDE SIDE

AS SHOWN

FENCING INTEGRAL

WITH COFFERDAM
30±LF

FENCING

AND GATE
GATE
50±LF

FENCING

AND GATE

ON LAND
85±LF

FENCING INTEGRAL

WITH COFFERDAM
85'

CENTERLINE BRIDGE PIER TO CENTERLINE BRIDGE PIER
&

CENTERLINE TO CENTERLINE

OF PIER ARRANGEMENTS BRIDGE SUPPORT PIER UNDER BRIDGE BRIDGE SUPPORT PIER UNDER BRIDGE

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

APPROXIMATE LOCATION

OF EXISTING CREEK WALL

UNDER BRIDGE

REINFORCED
CONCRETE PIERS, TYP.

PIER POLESEMBEDDED IN

CONCRETE PIERS,
TYP.

GALVANIZEDSTEEL PIER POLES, TYP..

EXISTING
TIMBER PILES, TYP.
25' 25'
25'

BRIDGE SUPPORTPIER UNDERBRIDGE

REINFORCED
CONCRETE PIER, TYP.

REINFORCED

CONCRETE
FOOTING, TYP.

EXISTING
TIMBER PILES, TYP.
(DIAGRAMMATICALLY
SHOWN)

PIER FOOTING

SOQUEL CREEK

FLOW DIRECTION

APPROXIMATE

CREEK BOTTOM
SDA3 - XX/XX/XX XXX XXX XXX XXX 1" = X'
P:\Shared\Projects\2023\2300338 Capitola Stockton Bridge Replacement\DWG\Exhibits\Cost Estimate Exhibits.dwg 06/21/2024 - 01:28 PM nankk 1:1 Sheet Plan File: Project Number: 2300338 Prepared Under the Direction of: CITY OF CAPITOLA STOCKTON AVENUE BRIDGE MITIGATION State County City California Santa Cruz Capitola
Rev Date Description Designed Drawn Checked
Scale:

Date: 04/18/2024
303 TWIN DOLPHIN DRIVE
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
©2024
ENGINEERING | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
SURVEYING | URBAN PLANNING
415.883.9850
WWW.CSWST2.COM

DEBRIS DIVERSION PIERS

SCHEMATIC DESIGN ALTERNATIVE
PLAN

UPSTREAM ELEVATION WESTWARD ELEVATION
SCALE: 1"=10'SCALE: 1"=10' SCALE: 1"=10'
479
Item 9 A.

Stockton Avenue Bridge Debris Mitigation Measure - Debris Diversion Sweeper Program Level Cost Estimate

06.21.2024
UNIT
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT COST CONT AMOUNT
101 Mobilization/ Demobilization 1 LS $85,027 $85,027
102 Traffic Management 1 LS 37,200.00$ 10% $40,920
103 Jobsite Fencing and Gates on Land 100 LF 50.00$ 25% $6,250 104 Jobsite Fencing in Water/On Cofferdam 200 LF 75.00$ 25% $18,750 105 Bridge Protection 30 LF 500.00$ 25% $18,750
106 Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS 13,000.00$ 10% $14,300 107 Construction Layout 1 LS 10,000.00$ 10% $11,000
108 Environmental Monitoring 1 LS 48,000.00$ 10% $52,800 109 Coffer Dam 2 EA $ 70,000.00 25% $175,000
110 Dewatering 1 LS $ 60,000.00 25% $75,000
111 Access Bridges and Scaffolding 1 LS $ 150,000.00 25% $187,500 112 Prefabricated Debris Sweeper 2 EA $ 60,000.00 25% $150,000 113 Reinforced Concrete Pier 2 EA 25,000.00$ 25% $62,500 114 Pump House Removal 1 LS 30,000.00$ 25% $37,500
$935,000
Notes
$100,000
$37,843
$140,250

2. Assumes 25' Pier embedment length. $1,213,093
$1,298,000
$1,389,000
Prepared by: J Harberson
Checked by : K Pillsbury CLASS 5 ESTIMATE
Planning and CEQA
Total Construction Cost:

Recommended Budget $1,300,000 to $1,400,000
Final Design
Construction Management
Total Cost (2024 Dollars)
Total Cost (2025 Dollars)
Total Cost (2026 Dollars)
Assumes two (2) debris sweepers
installed over a construction period of
20 days.

1. 480
Item 9 A.
1 inch = 10 ft.
10 85'

S T O C K T O N A V E

SOQUEL CREEK

FLOW DIRECTION

CREEK WALL CREEK WALL

EDGE EXISTINGBRIDGE DECK

SOQUEL CREEK

FLOW DIRECTION

TO PACIFIC OCEAN

CREEK WALL CREEK WALL

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

CREEK WALLCONTINUES

UNDER BRIDGE

PIERUNDER BRIDGE

PIERUNDER BRIDGE
MANUFACTURED FLOATINGDEBRIS SWEEPER, TYP.

ESTIMATED OUTER DIAMETER: 3'

25.4±' 10.4±'

4.5±
'
90±LF COFFERDAM
85±LF COFFERDAM
10±LF BRIDGE PROTECTION + COFFERDAM 10±LF BRIDGE PROTECTION + COFFERDAM BRIDGE.

GAP IS ABOUT 2'

AS SHOWN STAIRS AND SCAFFOLDING
INSIDE

STAIRS ANDSCAFFOLDING
INSIDE
BRIDGE.

GAP IS ABOUT 15'ON WIDE SIDE

AS SHOWN

FENCING INTEGRAL

WITH COFFERDAM
30±LF

FENCING

AND GATE
GATE
50±LF

FENCING

AND GATE

ON LAND
65±LF

FENCING INTEGRAL

WITH COFFERDAM
85'
CENTERLINE EX. BRIDGE PIER TO EX. BRIDGE PIER
&

CENTERLINE SWEEPER TO CENTERLINE SWEEPER PIER UNDER
BRIDGE

PIER UNDERBRIDGE

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

APPROXIMATE LOCATION

OF EXISTING CREEK WALL

UNDER BRIDGE

REINFORCED
CONCRETE PIER, TYP.

EXISTING
TIMBER PILES, TYP.

GALVANIZED STEEL

POST EMBEDDED IN
CONCRETE PIER.

MANUFACTURED FLOATING DEBRIS SWEEPER.RISES AND FALLS WITH WATER LEVEL. 25' 25'

PIER FOOTING,
TYP.

4.5'±

PIER UNDERBRIDGE

REINFORCED
CONCRETE PIER, TYP.

GALVANIZED STEEL

POST EMBEDDED IN
CONCRETE PIER.

EXISTING
TIMBER PILES, TYP.
(DIAGRAMMATICALLY
SHOWN)
MANUFACTURED FLOATINGDEBRIS SWEEPER.

PIER FOOTING

SOQUEL CREEK

FLOW DIRECTION

APPROXIMATE

CREEK BOTTOM
SDA4 - XX/XX/XX XXX XXX XXX XXX 1" = X'
P:\Shared\Projects\2023\2300338 Capitola Stockton Bridge Replacement\DWG\Exhibits\Cost Estimate Exhibits.dwg 06/21/2024 - 01:52 PM nankk 1:1 Sheet Plan File: Project Number: 2300338 Prepared Under the Direction of: CITY OF CAPITOLA STOCKTON AVENUE BRIDGE MITIGATION State County City California Santa Cruz Capitola
Rev Date Description Designed Drawn Checked
Scale:

Date: 04/18/2024
303 TWIN DOLPHIN DRIVE
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
©2024
ENGINEERING | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
SURVEYING | URBAN PLANNING
415.883.9850
WWW.CSWST2.COM

DEBRIS DIVERSION SWEEPER

SCHEMATIC DESIGN ALTERNATIVE
PLAN

UPSTREAM ELEVATION WESTWARD ELEVATION
SCALE: 1"=10'SCALE: 1"=10' SCALE: 1"=10'
481
Item 9 A.

Stockton Avenue Bridge Debris Mitigation Measure - Bridge Replacement Program Level Cost Estimate

06.21.2024
UNIT
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT COST CONT AMOUNT
101 Mobilization/ Demobilization 1 LS $1,379,084 $1,379,084 102 Traffic Management 1 LS 260,000.00$ 15% $299,000
103 Existing Building Protection and
Pedestrian Access to Buildings 1 LS 100,000.00$ 15% $115,000 104 Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS 70,000.00$ 10% $77,000 105 Jobsite Fencing and Gates on Land 120 LF 50.00$ 25% $7,500 106 Jobsite Fencing in Water/On Cofferdam 300 LF 75.00$ 25% $28,125 105 Bridge Demolition 1 LS 200,000.00$ 25% $250,000
106 Dewatering 1 LS 60,000.00$ 25% $75,000
107 Access Bridges and Scaffolding 1 LS 100,000.00$ 25% $125,000 108 Construction Layout 1 LS 50,000.00$ 15% $57,500
109 Environmental Monitoring 1 LS 108,000.00$ 15% $124,200 110 Bridge Decking 7,020 SF 500.00$ 25% $4,387,500
111 Bridge Abutments 2 EA 2,800,000.00$ 25% $7,000,000
112 Coffer Dams for Bridge Abuttments 2 EA 100,000.00$ 25% $250,000 113 Walls, Walks and Ramps for 2 Parks 1 LS 50,000.00$ 25% $62,500 114 Offbridge Curb and Gutter 247 LF 50.00$ 10% $13,585 115 Offbridge Sidewalk 2,150 SF 45.00$ 10% $106,425
116 Lighting & Electrical Service 1 LS 150,000.00$ 25% $187,500 117 Utilities (water, sewer, gas) 300 LF 1,000.00$ 25% $375,000 118 Temp. Utility Bypass (water, sewer, gas) 300 LF 500.00$ 25% $187,500 119 Striping & Signage 1 LS 20,000.00$ 25% $25,000
120 Pump House Removal 1 LS 30,000.00$ 25% $37,500
$15,170,000
Notes
$300,000
$758,500
$1,061,900
$17,290,400
$18,501,000
$19,796,000

4. Assumes new abutments located in same location as existing.

6. Bridge Decking includes walls, curb and sidewalk.

7. Bridge Abutment includes all structural elements.

Prepared by: J Harberson
Checked by : K Pillsbury CLASS 5 ESTIMATE
Demolitions includes, cost of coffer
dams and dewatering to remove piers.

2. 3.

5. Environmental Montioring assumed to be limited to in water work and abutment demolition/construction (i.e. 45 days)
Planning and CEQA
Total Construction Cost:

Recommended Budget $17,300,000 to $19,800,000
Final Design
Construction Management
Total Cost (2024 Dollars)
Total Cost (2025 Dollars)
Total Cost (2026 Dollars)
Assumes 135' clear span bridge with a 6'
deck system, constructed over a period
of five (5) months.

1. Traffic Control Costs assume existing bridge is
demolished 1/2 at a time, the remaining half will be
utilized for one (1) lane of traffic (includes
pedestrian and bicycle traffic)
482
Item 9 A.
1 inch = 10 ft.
10 52'
PROPO
SED
WIDTH

EDGE BRIDGE DECK/
OUTSIDE EDGE OF RAIL.

MATCH EDGE OFEXISTING BRIDGE

S T O C K T O N A V E
8'
SID
E-
WA
LK
5 '
B
IK
E
L
A
N
E
12'
TRAVE
LLANE
12'
TRAVE
LLANE
5 '
B
IK
E
L
A
N
E
8'
SID
E-
WA

LKEDGE DECK/ OUTSIDE
EDGE OF RAIL OFEXISTING BRIDGE.

44.17'

EXISTIN
G
WIDTH
EDGE DECK/ OUTSIDEEDGE OF RAIL OFPROPOSED BRIDGE.

SOQUEL CREEK

FLOW DIRECTION

CREEK WALL CREEK WALL

SOQUEL CREEK

FLOW DIRECTION

TO PACIFIC OCEAN

CREEK WALL CREEK WALL

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

UNDER BRIDGE

CREEK WALLCONTINUES

UNDER BRIDGE

PIERUNDER BRIDGE
(DEMO)

4.8%

MATCH EX

ELEVATION

MATCH EX

ELEVATION
146±LF COFFERDAM &

FENCING INTEGRAL

WITH COFFERDAM
12±LF WALL

PROTECTION
+ COFFERDAM
STAIRS

STAIRS ANDSCAFFOLDING
INSIDE

STAIRS ANDSCAFFOLDING
INSIDE
40±LF

FENCING

AND GATE
45±LF

FENCING

AND GATE
133±LF COFFERDAM &

FENCING INTEGRAL

WITH COFFERDAM
20±LF WALL

PROTECTION
+ COFFERDAM
STAIRS
20±LF WALL

PROTECTION
+ COFFERDAM
12±LF WALL

PROTECTION
+ COFFERDAM
15±LF

FENCING
20±LF FENCING
NOTE:

COFFERDAMS SHOWN ARE SCHEMATIC AND SIZED APPROXIMATELY TO

ACCOMMODATE PIER DEMOLITION, ABUTMENT DEMOLITION AND ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION UNDER ENTIRE WIDTH OF PROPOSED BRIDGE.

EXACT CONFIGURATION IS SUBJECT TO MITIGATION AND SAFETYREQUIREMENTS, CONSTRUCTION STAGING, SCHEDULE AND CONTRACTOR'SMEANS AND METHODS. 135'±

CLEAR SPAN

REMOVE PIER UNDER BRIDGE

ABOVE FOOTING, TYP, EXISTING AND PROPOSED

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

EXISTING AND

PROPOSED

FACE OF

ABUTMENT

APPROXIMATE LOCATION

OF EXISTING CREEK WALL

UNDER BRIDGE EXISTING TIMBER PILES
TO REMAIN, TYP.

PIER FOOTING,

TO BE DETERMINED WHETHER TO
REMOVE OR TO REMAIN, TYP.

MATCH EX

PAVEMENTELEVATION

MATCH EXPAVEMENTELEVATION

EXISTING DECKELEVATION,
APPROXIMATE.

PROPOSED DECKELEVATION,
APPROXIMATE.
6'

BRIDGE SOFFIT,
APPROXIMATE.

BRIDGE RAIL /BARRIER

ARCHITECTURAL AND

LIGHTING ELEMENTS,
ETC., TO BE DETERMINED.

4.8%

4.8%
SDA5.1 - XX/XX/XX XXX XXX XXX XXX 1" = X'
P:\Shared\Projects\2023\2300338 Capitola Stockton Bridge Replacement\DWG\Exhibits\Cost Estimate Exhibits.dwg 06/21/2024 - 05:09 PM nankk 1:1 Sheet Plan File: Project Number: 2300338 Prepared Under the Direction of: CITY OF CAPITOLA STOCKTON AVENUE BRIDGE MITIGATION State County City California Santa Cruz Capitola
Rev Date Description Designed Drawn Checked
Scale:

Date: 04/18/2024
303 TWIN DOLPHIN DRIVE
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
©2024
ENGINEERING | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
SURVEYING | URBAN PLANNING
415.883.9850
WWW.CSWST2.COM

CLEAR SPAN BRIDGE

SCHEMATIC DESIGN ALTERNATIVE
PLAN

UPSTREAM ELEVATION
SCALE: 1"=10'SCALE: 1"=10'
483
Item 9 A.

Stockton Avenue Bridge – Bridge Pier Debris Mitigation Feasibility Report CSWST2 |
Appendix G – Capitola Bridge Over Soquel Creek As-Built Plans

484
Item 9 A.

California Department of Transportation
Division of Maintenance
Structure Maintenance and Investigations
BRIDGE

INSPECTION

RECORDS

INFORMATION
SYSTEM
The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS.

These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual.

Records for “Confidential” bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement. 485
Item 9 A.
486
Item 9 A.
487
Item 9 A.
488
Item 9 A.
489
Item 9 A.

Stockton Avenue Bridge – Bridge Pier Debris Mitigation Feasibility Report CSWST2 |
Appendix H – Bridge Inspection Reports
490
Item 9 A.

California Department of Transportation
Division of Maintenance
Structure Maintenance and Investigations
BRIDGE

INSPECTION

RECORDS

INFORMATION
SYSTEM
The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS.

These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual.

Records for “Confidential” bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement. 491
Item 9 A.

Printed on: Saturday 10/15/2022 09:36 PM Page 1 of 36C0110/AAAM/83097 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Routine-Roadway View (09/25/2019) Routine-Elevation View (09/25/2019) Routine-Underside View (09/25/2019) Routine-Map View (10/05/2022)

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION

LOCATION AT THE ESPLANADE
TEAM LEADER Shawn Hart

FACILITY CARRIED STOCKTON AVE
No.

REPORT AUTHOR Shawn Hart

FEATURE INTERSECTED SOQUEL CREEK

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
LATITUDE 36°58'20.27"
Shawn Hart (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY S.Hart/K.Ghazizadeh

CULVERT N N/A (NBI)
DECK 4 POOR
SUBSTRUCTURE 5 FAIR
SUPERSTRUCTURE 5 FAIR SUFFICIENCY RATING 60.6

STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS SD
524

PAINT CONDITION N/A

STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
STRUCTURE EVALUATION 5 ABOVE MIN TOLERABLE
LONGITUDE 121°57'11.45"
SCOUR 5 STABLE W/IN FOOTING
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 150000000
POSTMILE 0

ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NOT ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Shawn
Hart
09/30/2023
CIVIL
68403
10/15/2022
Date
Exp.

BRIDGE NO.:
36C0110
STRUCTURE NAME:

SOQUEL CREEK May 18, 2022
INSPECTION DATE:

DECK AREA (M) 2
492
Item 9 A.

Printed on: Saturday 10/15/2022 09:36 PM Page 2 of 36C0110/AAAM/83097 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 3 span, continuous parabolic RC (7 cell) box girder with cantilevered end spans on RC pier walls and RC diaphragm ends with nonmonolithic wingwalls, all founded on RC pile caps and timber piles 1 @ 25 ft, 1 @ 85 ft, 1 @ 25 ft

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

SPAN CONFIGURATION
(36)SANTA CRUZ
05 (11040) CAPITOLA

BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER

BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE

COUNTY CODE

HIGHWAY DISTRICT

STATE NAME

PLACE CODE
% SHARE

AGENCY INFORMATION

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
N/A

YEAR BUILT

YEAR MODIFIED

LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
1934
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES

41.1 0
2 0

MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
3 LOAD CAPACITY

DESIGN LOAD

INVENTORY RATING

OPERATING RATING

CALC METHOD

CALC METHOD
0 UNKNOWN
RF=1.01 =>32.7 metric tons
RF=1.68 =>54.4 metric tons
1 LF LOAD FACTOR
1 LF LOAD FACTOR

PERMIT RATING

POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
PPPPP
MAX SPAN (M) 25.9
Unimpaired 99.99 M

MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO

NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 2: CONCRETE CONT
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 05: BOX BEAM OR GDR - MU
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE

BRIDGE POSTING

STRUCTURE STATUS
(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M
(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF 0.0 M (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF 0.00 M
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

N-NOT H/RR

INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE

FRACTURE CRITICAL INSP N-NO MO A)

OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C)
UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B) 04/96
INSPECTION DATE 05/22 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
Speed 25 N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
09/04/19
CALIFORNIA 069

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date BDS, Hand Calcs (LRE) - 09/03/19 Calculated
N/A

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
493
Item 9 A.

Printed on: Saturday 10/15/2022 09:36 PM Page 3 of 36C0110/AAAM/83097 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS

SCOPE AND ACCESS
This inspection was completed in accordance with SM&I standards for a routine regularly scheduled evaluation. All elements received a full visual inspection. The deck was walked and the channel was waded and probed. Flowing water was present under all spans at a depth of 2-3 feet with the pierwalls wet and the abutments dry.

NUMBERING CONVENTION
This structure alignment is east and west. The western abutment is Abutment 1 and is located nearest to the Venetian Court with the ocean on the right. The eastern abutment is Abutment 4 and is located nearest the Esplanade.

INSPECTION COMMENTARY

TYPE OF MEMBRANE

TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION

DECK STRUCTURE TYPE

TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE

WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 15000
YEAR OF ADT 2013
BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 3 KM
(109) TRUCK ADT % 10 %
FUTURE ADT 20403
YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 2: ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
0-NONE
0-NONE
0-NONE
1-CIP CONCRETE

DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION

12.9 M

9.1 M

DECK AND ROADWAY
LANES 2
25 0-NOT ON NHS

PARALLEL STRUCTURE

TEMPORARY STRUCTURE

DEFENSE HIGHWAY

FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED

NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL

DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC

DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK

TYPE OF SERVICE

FEDERAL LANDS HWY
APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT
DECK GEOMETRY 3 INTOLERABLE - CORRECT
APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 9.1 M

BRIDGE MEDIAN
CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 1.5 M

TOTAL WIDTH

NET WIDTH
INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 9.1 M
INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M
3-ON FREE ROAD
16-MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET

N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
0 NO MEDIAN
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION

1.08 ft br, 5 ft sw, 30 ft, 5 ft sw, 1.08 ft br

DECK CROSS SECTION

LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches) 0 inches
N/A
(51)
(52)
(50)
(32)
(33)
(107)
(108)
A)
B)
C)
(29)
(30)
(19)
(114)
(115)
(37)
(42a)
(12)
(13)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(10)
(47)
(68)
(72)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(28a)
(103)

CONDITION INFORMATION
(49) LENGTH 41.1 M
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
16 Top Flange-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
524
260
sq.m
each
264
0 0
0 260
260
0 0

DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot
1130
Defect
(16-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
The bare concrete deck surface is weathered and abraded with random cracking throughout. The randomly oriented deck cracks are up to 0.125 inches in width at an average of 2 feet on center. See Photo #4 from 2019. A work recommendation to place a polyester concrete overlay on the deck was entered in 2011.
(58) DECK RATING =4

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
494
Item 9 A.

Printed on: Saturday 10/15/2022 09:36 PM Page 4 of 36C0110/AAAM/83097 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
Sandy beach outlet, tidal influence

TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER

UNDERCLEARANCES V - H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)
WATER ADEQUACY 7 ABOVE MINIMUM

VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M

NAVIGATION CONTROL
NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M
NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M

PIER PROTECTION
5-WATERWAY 0: NO CONTROL
SCOUR 5 STABLE W/IN FOOTING

SCOUR POA DATE N/A
CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED
N/A
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
105 Box Girder-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
3 3
41 41
m
each
0 0
41 41
0 0
0 0

SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
1130

SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES

SUPERSTRUCTURE

SUBSTRUCTURE
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING = 5
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE RATING = 5
(105) Box Girder-RC
(105-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State The box girder soffit exhibits numerous previous patches, minor areas of thin cover, patchy scaliness with efflorescent staining that is co-located with the cracking detailed below.

The soffit in Span 1 has a longitudinal crack with efflorescence along the centerline, numerous previous patches and efflorescent staining.

The soffit in Span 2 has transverse cracking with black leachate near the midspan along the edge of deck on the left and right, a longitudinal crack with efflorescence along the centerline, and numerous previous patches. There are also several 5 foot long transverse cracks at the crown of the soffit.

The soffit in Span 3 has a longitudinal crack with efflorescence along the centerline continuing down the face of Pier Wall 3.

No substantial changes were noted to the superstructure since the last routine inspection. See Photos #8 to #10 from 2011.

All cracks described in this defect are between 0.012 and 0.05 inches in width. (36a) Rail Code 0 0 0 0
304
331
Joint-Open Expansion
Debris Impaction (Joints)
Railing-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
2 2
4 4
27 27
82 20
m
each
m
each
0 0
62 0
27 27
8 8
0 0
12 12
0 0
0 0

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 2350
1080

RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End Roadway Speed 25 MPH

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(304-2350) Debris Impaction (Joints)
(331-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
The armored open joints at the abutments are filled with emulsion, dirt and debris. See Photo #6 from 2011. A work recommendation to clean out the joints has been entered.

The bridge rails have some areas of delamination and spalling greater than 6 inches in diameter with exposed corroded reinforcement. See Photo #5 from 2019. A work recommendation to patch the spalls was entered in 2001. 495
Item 9 A.

Printed on: Saturday 10/15/2022 09:36 PM Page 5 of 36C0110/AAAM/83097 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Photo 1
Routine Map View

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS
210
215
228
256
Pier Wall-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
Abutment-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
Pile-Timber
Slope Protection
3 3
3 3
3 3
4 2
26 3
13 27
2 14
1 1
m
each
each
m
each
each
ea.
ea.
10 0
0 11
0 0
1 1
16 3
13 16
2 14
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1080
1130
1080
1130

SUBSTRUCTURE
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE RATING = 5
(210-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(210-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(215) Abutment-RC
(215-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(215-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(228) Pile-Timber
(256) Slope Protection
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
The pier walls have occasional sound patches.

The pier walls have occasional random cracks with cracks sizes generally under 0.05 inches in width.

This element represents the vertical diaphragms adjacent to the ends of the cantilevered end spans.

Wingwalls are not integral to the abutment and are not included in this quantity.

The abutments have occasional sound patches.

The abutment faces have occasional random cracks with crack sizes generally under 0.05 inches in width.

The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element.

There were no significant defects noted.
496
Item 9 A.

Printed on: Saturday 10/15/2022 09:36 PM Page 6 of 6 36C0110/AAAM/83097 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
Work By
Work By
Action
Action
Est Cost
Est Cost
Rec Date
Rec Date

LOCAL AGENCY

LOCAL AGENCY
Joints-Repair/Clean
Railing-Repair
09/25/2019
05/02/2001
Str Target
Str Target

ROUTINE

ROUTINE
Clean the dirt and debris out of the joints at the abutments.

Clean and patch the delaminations and the spalls on the bridge rail.

Dist Target
Dist Target
EA
EA
Status
Status

PROPOSED

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost
Deck-Place Overlay
10/05/2011
Str Target ROUTINE
Place a polyester concrete overlay on the deck.

Dist Target
Status PROPOSED EA

WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
497
Item 9 A.

Printed on: Wednesday 03/16/2022 05:52 PM Page 1 of 36C0110/AAAL/72473 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Routine-Roadway View (09/25/2019) Routine-Elevation View (09/25/2019) Routine-Underside View (09/25/2019) Routine-Map View (02/16/2022)

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION

LOCATION AT THE ESPLANADE
TEAM LEADER Shawn Hart

FACILITY CARRIED STOCKTON AVE
No.

REPORT AUTHOR Shawn Hart

FEATURE INTERSECTED SOQUEL CREEK

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
LATITUDE 36°58'20.27"
Shawn Hart (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY S.Hart/J.Mok

CULVERT N N/A (NBI)
DECK 4 POOR
SUBSTRUCTURE 5 FAIR
SUPERSTRUCTURE 5 FAIR SUFFICIENCY RATING 60.6

STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS SD
524

PAINT CONDITION N/A

STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
STRUCTURE EVALUATION 5 ABOVE MIN TOLERABLE
LONGITUDE 121°57'11.45"
SCOUR 5 STABLE W/IN FOOTING
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 150000000
POSTMILE 0

ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NOT ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Shawn
Hart
09/30/2023
CIVIL
68403
3/16/2022
Date
Exp.

BRIDGE NO.:
36C0110
STRUCTURE NAME:

SOQUEL CREEK September 17, 2021
INSPECTION DATE:

DECK AREA (M) 2
498
Item 9 A.

Printed on: Wednesday 03/16/2022 05:52 PM Page 2 of 36C0110/AAAL/72473 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 SCOPE AND ACCESS
This inspection was completed in accordance with SM&I standards for a routine regularly scheduled evaluation. All elements received a

INSPECTION COMMENTARY
3 span, continuous parabolic RC (7 cell) box girder with cantilevered end spans on RC pier walls and RC diaphragm ends with nonmonolithic wingwalls, all founded on RC pile caps and timber piles 1 @ 25 ft, 1 @ 85 ft, 1 @ 25 ft

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

SPAN CONFIGURATION
(36)SANTA CRUZ
05 (11040) CAPITOLA

BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER

BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE

COUNTY CODE

HIGHWAY DISTRICT

STATE NAME

PLACE CODE
% SHARE

AGENCY INFORMATION

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
N/A

YEAR BUILT

YEAR MODIFIED

LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
1934
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES

41.1 0
2 0

MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
3 LOAD CAPACITY

DESIGN LOAD

INVENTORY RATING

OPERATING RATING

CALC METHOD

CALC METHOD
0 UNKNOWN
RF=1.01 =>32.7 metric tons
RF=1.68 =>54.4 metric tons
1 LF LOAD FACTOR
1 LF LOAD FACTOR

PERMIT RATING

POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
PPPPP
MAX SPAN (M) 25.9
Unimpaired 99.99 M

MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO

NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 2: CONCRETE CONT
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 05: BOX BEAM OR GDR - MU
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE

BRIDGE POSTING

STRUCTURE STATUS
(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M
(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF 0.0 M (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF 0.00 M
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

N-NOT H/RR

INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE

FRACTURE CRITICAL INSP N-NO MO A)

OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C)
UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B) 04/96
INSPECTION DATE 09/21 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
Speed 25 N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
09/04/19
CALIFORNIA 069

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION

CONDITION INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date BDS, Hand Calcs (LRE) - 09/03/19 Calculated
N/A

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
499
Item 9 A.

Printed on: Wednesday 03/16/2022 05:52 PM Page 3 of 36C0110/AAAL/72473 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS
full visual inspection. The deck was walked and the channel was waded and probed. Flowing water was present under all spans at a depth of 2-3 feet with the pierwalls wet and the abutments dry.

WATERWAY
The channel cross section was re-measured during this inspection. No significant changes from the previous cross section (measured in 2013) were observed.

INSPECTION COMMENTARY

TYPE OF MEMBRANE

TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION

DECK STRUCTURE TYPE

TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE

DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION

12.9 M

9.1 M

DECK AND ROADWAY
LANES 2
25 0-NOT ON NHS

PARALLEL STRUCTURE

TEMPORARY STRUCTURE

DEFENSE HIGHWAY

FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED

NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL

DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC

DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK

TYPE OF SERVICE

FEDERAL LANDS HWY
APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT
DECK GEOMETRY 3 INTOLERABLE - CORRECT
APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 9.1 M

BRIDGE MEDIAN
CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 1.5 M

TOTAL WIDTH

NET WIDTH
INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 9.1 M
INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M
3-ON FREE ROAD
16-MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET

N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
0 NO MEDIAN
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION

1.08 ft br, 5 ft sw, 30 ft, 5 ft sw, 1.08 ft br

DECK CROSS SECTION

LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

CONDITION INFORMATION
(49) LENGTH 41.1 M
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
16 Top Flange-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
524
260
sq.m
each
264
0 0
0 260
260
0 0

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
500
Item 9 A.

Printed on: Wednesday 03/16/2022 05:52 PM Page 4 of 36C0110/AAAL/72473 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
Sandy beach outlet, tidal influence

TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER

UNDERCLEARANCES V - H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)
WATER ADEQUACY 7 ABOVE MINIMUM

VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M

NAVIGATION CONTROL
NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M
NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M

PIER PROTECTION
5-WATERWAY 0: NO CONTROL
SCOUR 5 STABLE W/IN FOOTING

SCOUR POA DATE N/A
CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED
N/A
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
105 Box Girder-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
3 3
41 41
m
each
0 0
41 41
0 0
0 0

SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
1130

SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES

SUPERSTRUCTURE

SUBSTRUCTURE
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING = 5
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE RATING = 5
(105) Box Girder-RC
(105-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Elem Element Description
No.

The soffit in Span 1 has a longitudinal crack with efflorescence along the centerline, numerous previous patches and efflorescent staining.

The soffit in Span 3 has a longitudinal crack with efflorescence along the centerline continuing down the face of Pier Wall 3.

No substantial changes were noted to the superstructure since the last routine inspection. See Photos #8 to #10 from 2011.

All cracks described in this defect are between 0.012 and 0.05 inches in width. (36a) Rail Code 0 0 0 0
304
331
Joint-Open Expansion
Debris Impaction (Joints)
Railing-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
2 2
4 4
27 27
82 12
m
each
m
each
0 0
70 0
27 27
0 0
0 0
12 12
0 0
0 0

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 2350
1080

RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End Roadway Speed 25 MPH

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(304-2350) Debris Impaction (Joints)
(331-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Elem Element Description
No.

Printed on: Wednesday 03/16/2022 05:52 PM Page 5 of 36C0110/AAAL/72473 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Side Upstream X-Section Date 09/17/2021
Measured From Top of RC Rail (left side)

6.32 7.10

7.48 7.04

6.48 6.00

3.90 Vert(m)
Span 2 Side
Span 2 Side
Paved shore
Face of Abutment 1
Mid Span 1
Pier 2
Mid Span 2
Pier 3
Mid Span 3
Face of Abutment 4
Location

CHANNEL X-SECTION
Horiz(m) Comments

0.00 3.95

7.92 21.05

33.80 37.95

42.10 210
215
228
256
Pier Wall-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
Abutment-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
Pile-Timber
Slope Protection
3 3
3 3
3 3
4 2
26 3
13 27
2 14
1 1
m
each
each
m
each
each
ea.
ea.
10 0
0 11
0 0
1 1
16 3
13 16
2 14
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1080
1130
1080
1130

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
The pier walls have occasional sound patches.

The pier walls have occasional random cracks with cracks sizes generally under 0.05 inches in width.

This element represents the vertical diaphragms attached the ends of the cantilevered end spans.

Wingwalls are not integral to the abutment and are not included in this quantity.

The abutments have occasional sound patches.

The abutment faces have occasional random cracks with crack sizes generally under 0.05 inches in width.

There were no significant defects noted.
502
Item 9 A.

Printed on: Wednesday 03/16/2022 05:52 PM Page 6 of 6 36C0110/AAAL/72473 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
Work By
Work By
Action
Action
Est Cost
Est Cost
Rec Date
Rec Date

LOCAL AGENCY

LOCAL AGENCY
Joints-Repair/Clean
Railing-Repair
09/25/2019
05/02/2001
Str Target
Str Target
2 YEARS
2 YEARS
Clean the dirt and debris out of the joints at the abutments.

Clean and patch the delaminations and the spalls on the bridge rail.

Dist Target
Dist Target
EA
EA
Status
Status

PROPOSED

PROPOSED
Photo 1
Routine Map View

OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost
Deck-Place Overlay
10/05/2011
Str Target 2 YEARS
Place a polyester concrete overlay on the deck.

Dist Target
Status PROPOSED EA

WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
503
Item 9 A.
504
Item 9 A.
505
Item 9 A.
506
Item 9 A.
507
Item 9 A.
508
Item 9 A.
509
Item 9 A.
510
Item 9 A.
511
Item 9 A.
512
Item 9 A.
513
Item 9 A.
514
Item 9 A.
515
Item 9 A.
516
Item 9 A.
517
Item 9 A.
518
Item 9 A.
519
Item 9 A.
520
Item 9 A.
521
Item 9 A.
522
Item 9 A.
523
Item 9 A.
524
Item 9 A.
525
Item 9 A.
526
Item 9 A.
527
Item 9 A.
528
Item 9 A.
529
Item 9 A.
530
Item 9 A.
531
Item 9 A.
532
Item 9 A.
533
Item 9 A.
534
Item 9 A.
535
Item 9 A.
536
Item 9 A.
537
Item 9 A.
538
Item 9 A.
539
Item 9 A.
540
Item 9 A.
541
Item 9 A.
542
Item 9 A.

Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
Project Update
City Council
November 14, 2024
543
Item 9 A.
• Bridge ID: 36C0110
• Position: End of the
Soquel Creek
watershed
• Connectivity: Sole
Capitola crossing
apart from the
highway
• Traffic Volume:
15,000 - 20,000 ADT
Background
Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
544
Item 9 A.
• Year Constructed: 1934
• Replaced an older iron and wood bridge; built by a 15- person WPA crew in ~150 days, costing $25,000
• Structure:
• 3-span box girder design
• Length: 138 ft (85 ft center span), Width: 42 ft
• Current Condition: “Fair” (Sufficiency Rating: 60.6)
Background
Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
545
Item 9 A.
546
Item 9 A.

Earliest known bridge of its type in CA
• Porter Street: 1947, replaced 1994
• Soquel Drive: 1955, replaced 2002
• Highway 1: 1947, replaced 1995
Upstream bridges replaced
• Documented in City Council minutes as early as 1951
• Narrowest span is 10 ft; typical debris (e.g., fallen trees) measures 15–30 ft
Long time flooding concerns
Historical Context
Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
547
Item 9 A.
548
Item 9 A.

Funding Sources and Project Objectives
• 2013/2020 LHMP: Identified as critical for flood
management
• 2016: Due diligence memorandum recommended debris
fins; concept only report
Project Identification
• FY 2022-23 Budget: $350,000
• AB 102: Awarded additional $500,000 for evaluating and constructing debris diversion methods
Funding Milestones
• Feasibility study to assess effective debris mitigation options
Current Step
Project Identification and Funding
Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
549
Item 9 A.

Professional Services Agreement CSW/ST2
• Evaluate alternative mitigation measures
• Analyze debris flow patterns
• Assess hydraulic behavior
Study Objectives
• Environmental impacts
• Permitting requirements
• Cost analysis
Additional Considerations
Feasibility Study
Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
550
Item 9 A.
1) Debris Diversion Fins
2) Debris Diversion Cage
3) Debris Diversion Piers
4) Debris Sweeper
5) Bridge Replacement
Mitigation Options Funding Sources and Project Objectives Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
551
Item 9 A.
• Vertical or angled fins
installed upstream to
direct debris
• Reduces overall
capacity and raises
water level
• Significant
maintenance required;
high visual and
ecological impact
• Least effective for
flood risk reduction
Debris Diversion Fins Funding Sources and Project Objectives Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
552
Item 9 A.
• Cage installed
upstream to divert and
trap debris while
allowing water flow
• Moderately effective,
with potential
for blockage
• Regular maintenance
for small debris
• Effective for large
debris control; less
visually intrusive than
fins; moderate cost
Debris Diversion Cage Funding Sources and Project Objectives Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
553
Item 9 A.
• Vertical structures
installed at the bridge
piers to redirect debris
• Hydraulically effective,
may vary depending on
flow conditions
• Requires regular
maintenance
• Minimal visual impact;
minimal impact on
recreational activities
Debris Diversion Piers Funding Sources and Project Objectives Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
554
Item 9 A.
• Mechanical
device that clears
floating debris from
the water to prevent
buildup around piers.
• Limited effectiveness;
high potential
for failure
• Requires
frequent maintenance
and repairs
Debris Sweeper Funding Sources and Project Objectives
Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
555
Item 9 A.
• Replace the existing
with a free span bridge
• Requires significant
funding and planning
• Most effective option
for reducing risk and
enhancing capacity
• Minimal environmental
impact; preserves
character while
improving
transportation and
connectivity.

Bridge Replacement Funding Sources and Project Objectives Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
556
Item 9 A.

Flood Risk
Reduction
Recreational
Impact
Environmental
Impact Cost Hydraulic Feasibility Option
Least
effective
High
disruption
Significant
visual and
ecological
impact
Moderate Reduces capacity,
raises water level
Debris
Diversion Fins
Moderately
effective
Moderate
disruption
Moderate
visual impact Moderate Feasible but risks blockage
Debris
Diversion
Cage
Moderately
effective
Minimal
disruption
Minimal visual
impact Moderate Feasible with minimal blockage
Debris
Diversion
Piers
Least
effective,
unreliable
Minimal
disruption
Minimal
impact Low
Low
effectiveness,
high failure rate
Debris
Sweeper
Most
effective
Minimal
disruption
Minimal
impact,
preserves
aesthetics
High
Most effective,
improves flood
capacity
Bridge
Replacement
Mitigation Option Summary Funding Sources and Project Objectives Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
557
Item 9 A.
• Most effective long-term solution
• Increases hydraulic capacity and reduces flood risk
• Minimal environmental and aesthetic impact
• Temporary circulation impacts
Bridge Replacement
• Initiate planning and design for replacement
• Pursue state and federal grants
• Continue interim monitoring of debris accumulation
If Directed
Recommended Mitigation
Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
558
Item 9 A.

Historic Significance & Community Heritage Funding Sources and Project Objectives Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
559
Item 9 A.

Artistic Landmark & Cultural Icon Funding Sources and Project Objectives Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
560
Item 9 A.

Visual Impact
& Community
Character
561
Item 9 A.

Transportation & Connectivity Funding Sources and Project Objectives Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
562
Item 9 A.

Transportation & Connectivity Funding Sources and Project Objectives Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
563
Item 9 A.

Long-Term Development Process
Community
Engagement: Regular
input to align with local
goals.

Environmental
Compliance: Meets all
regulatory standards.

Design & Engineering:

Optimizes function,
aesthetics, and
resilience.

Funding: Ongoing
pursuit of grants and
resources.

Multi-year effort to deliver a solution that honors the bridge’s legacy while ensuring durability and community benefit.

Long-Term Development Process
Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
564
Item 9 A.
• $500,000 from California Department of Water
Resources (CDWR)
• $350,000 from FY 2022-23 budget
Total Project Funding: $850,000
• Covers design phase, pending CDWR approval
Current Phase
• Continue exploring additional funding sources for
full implementation
Next Steps
Fiscal Impact
Stockton Bridge Debris Mitigation
565
Item 9 A.

Recommended
Action
• Direct staff to utilize available funding to
develop project plans/permits and solicit
public feedback to rebuild Stockton Bridge
to address flood risk and debris
accumulation
566
Item 9 A.

Capitola City Council
Agenda Report
Meeting: November 14, 2024
From: Finance Department
Subject: FY 2024-25 City Fee Schedule
Recommended Action: Conduct the duly noticed public hearing on the proposed City Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2024-25 and adopt a resolution amending the current fee schedule.

Background: The City adopts a resolution that sets the City’s Fee Schedule on an annual basis, generally as part of the annual budget process, to reflect current costs of providing services, bring fees closer to full cost recovery targets, add new fees when applicable for new City services, and/ or eliminate fees for discontinued services. The Council adopted the most recent update in 2023.

For the 2024 update, the City contracted with Willdan Financial Services to analyze and recommend fee adjustments for City services to ensure full cost recovery while maintaining compliance with state laws. The fee study was presented to the City Council during a public hearing on November 7, 2024, and the City Council directed staff to return with a resolution adopting the FY 2024-25 Fee Schedule.

Discussion: The purpose of the fee study is to determine the City’s actual cost to provide services and recommend a cost recovery rate. The fee study recommends updated fees across various departments based on the actual costs to the City of delivering certain services. Since the last study in November 2015, costs to provide certain City services have increased due to inflation, salary increases, and changes in service delivery. Many current fees are outdated, and set below full cost recovery, leading to a higher dependence on the General Fund.

It is worth noting that different cities take different approaches to cost recovery based on local priorities. For example, some cities will only recover 25-30% of costs for recreation programs, while other cities will strive for 100% cost recovery for those same programs. While the Willdan study includes a recommended rate for all fees, the City Council may establish a lower cost recovery rate for any fee. Doing so would require the City to use general fund revenues to make up the difference between the fee and the City’s cost of providing the service. California law, including Propositions 218 and 26, mandate that fees must not exceed the City’s cost of providing the service. That means that State law prohibits the City from charging fees higher than those identified in the study.

Recommendations by Department:
 Public Works Department
 Significant fee increases are recommended to cover the costs of traffic control plan reviews, construction parking permits, and stormwater development reviews required for development in the City.
 Several new fees for inspection and permit services have been introduced.  Police Department
567
Item 9 B.
 Staff proposes as 38% average fee increase, with new fees and adjustments to existing fees imposed to review and issue special event permits and amplified sound permits, and various other administrative fees.
 New fees for services like vehicle boot removal and tow hearings are introduced to align with full cost recovery.
 Planning Division
 Adjustments reflect a 3% average decrease due to revised cost estimates for services like tree removal permits and accessory dwelling unit reviews.  The Planning Division recommends new fees for complex planning applications and environmental reviews to capture full-service costs.
 During the November 7, 2024, special City Council meeting, City Council requested fees for Child Care facilities be set at zero. Staff has verified that Home Daycare are now exempt from a use permit by state law, therefore not subject to Planning fees. Based on that input, the fee schedule has been adjusted so that Planning use permits for “Day Care Centers” and “Residential Care Facilities for Children” have been set at zero. Planning fees for mixed use projects, that may include childcare facilities, would be set based on the use permits for the non-childcare uses.
 In addition, at that same hearing staff recommended two additional changes in the Planning Division proposed fee schedule. Those changes included maintaining the Developer Agreement minimum deposit at $10,000, which had erroneously been listed at $1,000 in the draft fee schedule and maintaining the Information Technology Fee at 5% as established by Resolution No. 3786 adopted November 12, 2009. These changes have all been incorporated in the attached draft FY 2024-25 City Fee Schedule.  Building Division
 Proposed increase for building plan checks and inspection fees to reflect the additional staff time required for larger and more complex projects.  Staff also recommends new fees for permit extensions and reinstatements.  Community Services and Recreation Department
 Adjustments aim to keep programs affordable while improving cost recovery. The average recommended increase in fees for facility rentals and recreations programs is approximately 2%, however, there are no increases in registration fees for youth programs  Historical Museum
 No changes recommended; fees will remain at current levels.  Miscellaneous
 Increase outdoor dining space rent by 2023 CPI amount of 3.67%, increasing from $1.50 per square foot to $1.56 per square foot and from $3,400 annually per parking space to $3,524.78 annually per parking space, consistent with the existing outdoor dining agreements.
568
Item 9 B.
 This increase was not included in the initial User Fee Study Report and was subsequently added by staff.

Fiscal Impact: None at this time. Staff will be evaluating fee revenue during the mid-year budget review and make recommended budget amendments, if any, at that time.

Attachments:

1. Resolution (with Recommended FY 2024-25 Fee Schedule attached as Exhibit A) Report Prepared By: Jim Malberg, Finance Director
Reviewed By: Julia Gautho City Clerk; Samantha Zutler, City Attorney Approved By: Jamie Goldstein, City Manager
569
Item 9 B.

RESOLUTION NO. _____

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPITOLA
AMENDING THE CITY’S FEE SCHEDULE FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
WHEREAS, the City has the authority to impose fees, charges, and rates to offset the costs for municipal services and regulatory programs pursuant to its policy powers under California Constitution Article XI section 7; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has, over the years, adopted various fees and charges for City services. These fees are generally incorporated into a fee schedule, which the City Council updates annually (“Fee Schedule”); and
WHEREAS, the Government Code of the State of California, Section 66018 requires local agencies to notice and hold at least one open and public meeting prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Capitola has held duly noticed public hearings on November 7 and November 14, 2024, to consider amending existing fees charged for various City services. At both public hearings, the public was provided an opportunity to offer public comment; and
WHEREAS, it is the general policy of the City to charge for the full costs of services provided by City Staff when such services benefit individual users rather than the entire community as a whole; and
WHEREAS, to best achieve the City’s cost recovery goals and decrease pressure on the general fund, the City Council deems it advisable and consistent with the best interests of the public to adopt and update certain fees, as indicated on the Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, the City has retained a consultant to complete a comprehensive fee study also presented to City Council on November 7 and November 14, 2024; and WHEREAS, the fee study examined the costs to the City of providing certain services; in addition, City staff researched and analyzed the cost of services provided by the City and determined the appropriateness of these adjusted rates relative to the cost of providing services.

The proposed fees on the Fee Schedule are based on information in the fee study and staff’s determinations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed adjusted rates do not exceed the reasonable cost of providing these services; and
WHEREAS, this proposed Fee Schedule sets forth the City’s cost recovery fee programs, which includes minimum deposits against which staff costs, adjusted for overhead, are assessed; and
WHEREAS, all flat fees, with the exception of those established by law, may be adjusted annually by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose area; and WHEREAS, the City will analyze the fee schedule on a yearly basis to ensure hour estimates and staff costs are reasonable; and
WHEREAS, the City has made available to the public the required data pursuant to Government Code Section 66018 for at least ten days prior to adoption of a revised fee schedule. 570
Item 9 B.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:

1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

2. The City Council of the City of Capitola does hereby adopt the City of Capitola Fee Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit A, to become effective on Jan. 1, 2025, or as otherwise required by statute.

3. Commencing on July 1, 2025, and on July 1 of each fiscal year thereafter, the proposed fees as shown on the attached Fee Schedule may be administratively reviewed and increased annually based on any changes in City hourly rates. The proposed changes must be approved by the City Council.

4. This City Council finds that this action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as the adoption of a revised fee schedule is not a project within the meaning of CEQA Guidelines 15378 and 15061(b)(3). Also, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15378(b)(4), the creation of government funding mechanisms that do not involve any commitment to any specific project that may cause significant effect on the environment is not defined as “project” under CEQA.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Capitola at its regular meeting held on the 14th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN: _______________________
Kristen Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________
Julia Gautho, City Clerk
571
Item 9 B.

MISCELLANEOUS FEES
# Description 2024‐25 Proposed Fee Schedule
1 Appeal Fee Appeals to City Council (CMC 2.52) $593.00 2 Capitola Municipal Code $0.15
3 Capitola Municipal Code Supplement Service (Per year) $0.00 4 Copies:
5 1‐5 copies $0.00
6 6 or more copies (per copy) $0.25
7 Gov’t Code § 81008 (Political Reform Act) statements/reports  (Per copy) $0.10 8 Simple film permit $58.00
9 Major film permit $682.00
10 Returned Check Fee $25 first check, $35 after
11 Business License Overpayment Refund Fee (resolution 3532, ord 871) $0.00 12 Business License Late Payment Penalty Admin. Fee $25.00 13 Business License Application Fee (Reso. 3532) $25.00 14 Business License ‐ Disability Access and Education Fee (State) $4.00 15 Temporary, Publicly Attended Activities, Application Fee (Municipal Code § 9.36.040) $34.00 16 Public Art (Total Building Valuation $250,000 or more) (Municipal Code Chapter 2.58) 2% of TBV or 1% in lieu to City 17 Notice of Intent to Circulate Initiative Petition (Elections Code  § 9103(b)) $200.00 18 Outdoor Dining Rental Fees
19    Parking Spaces $3,524.78
20    Sidewalks and non‐parking spaces $18.66
21 Outdoor Dining Maintenance Deposit
22    Sidwalks and non‐parking spaces $500.00
23    1‐2 parking spaces $1,000.00
24    3‐5 parking spaces $1,500.00
25 Notary Service Fees (State Code)
26 Acknowledgment or proof of a deed, or other instrument, to include the seal and   writing of the certificate     $15.00 27 Administering an oath or affirmation to one person and executing the jurat, including the seal $15.00 28 Credit Card Transaction Fee 3%
29 Passport Acceptance Fee $35.00
30 Marriage License $35.00
31 Marriage Ceremony $100.00
32 Marriage Ceremony ‐ Witness Fee $25.00
572
Item 9 B.

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FEES
# Description 2024‐25 Proposed Fee Schedule
1 Encroachment Permits
2 Application Fee $127.00
3 Traffic Control Plan Review ‐ Local Street $63.00
4 Traffic Control Plan Review ‐ Collector Street $302.00 5 Traffic Control Plan Review ‐ Arterial Street $453.00 6 Inspection ‐ Local Street $63.00
7 Inspection ‐ Collector Street $169.00
8 Inspection ‐ Arterial Street $254.00
9 Revocable Encroachment Permit Application‐ Outdoor Dining $1,203.00 10 Temporary (includes materials storage within right‐of‐way road and sidewalk closures $21.00 11 Village Sidewalk Sign Encroachment Permit $206.00
12 Construction Parking Permit ‐ Village $24.00
13 Construction Parking Permit ‐ City Lot $12.00
14 Construction Parking Permit ‐ Neighborhood $25.00
15 Blanket Permits (repair and maintenance of existing facilitiesm encompassing up to 20 utility instances per year) $2,880.00
16 Revocable Encroachment for Private Improvements
17 Applications for Minor Revocable Encroachment $422.00 18 Applications for Major Revocable Encroachment $1,348.00 19 SPECIAL TRANSPORTATION PERMIT – OVERSIZE LOAD ‐ Single $16.00 20 SPECIAL TRANSPORTATION PERMIT – OVERSIZE LOAD ‐ Single $90.00 21 New Memorial Bench $2,560.00
22 Replacement Memorial Bench $2,509.00
23 Memorial Plaque $598.00
24 Replacement Plaque $429.00
25 Overhead Banner (ourtisde of special event) $144.00
26 Stormwater Development Review Fee
27 Application Fee $122.00
28 Large Project Plan Review Deposit
29 Tier 1 $306.00
30 Tier 2 $612.00
31 Tier 3 & 4 $612.00
32 Research Fee ‐ 1/2 hour minimum charge Cost
33 Information Technology Fee (Resolution No. 3786 adopted 11/12/09) 5% of Permit Fee 34 Final Parcel Map $4,143.00
35 Final Tract Map $5,735.00
36 Certificate of Compliance & Lot Merger $2,362.00
37 Boundary Line Adjustment $2,362.00
38 Separate Instrument Dedication Fee $2,710.00
39 Abandon Excess Public Right‐of‐Way & Public Easement $2,710.00 40 Improvement Plan Review
41 Design Permits ‐ Residential Single Family $208.00
42 Design Permits ‐ Residential Multi‐Family/Commercial $873.00 43 Building Permits ‐ Residential Single Family $347.00 44 Building Permits ‐ Residential Multi‐Family/Commercial $894.00 573
Item 9 B.

POLICE DEPARTMENT FEES
# Description 2024‐25 Proposed Fee Schedule
1 Special Event Permit $371.00
2 Recurring Special Event Permit ‐ Major $632.00
3 New Major Special Event Permit $1,911.00
4 Neighborhood Special Event/Block Party $195.00
5 Closure of Village for Special Event ‐full day $4,584.00 6 Closure of Village for Special Event ‐half day $2,292.00 7 Closure of Village for Special Event ‐full day (nonprofit) $2,750.40 8 Closure of Village for Special Event ‐half day (nonprofit) $1,375.20 9 Amplified Sound Permit (Municipal Code 9.12.040) $83.00 10 Bandstand Rental Fee $246 / 4 hrs or $492 all day /
deposit $1,500
11 Single Entertainment Permit $195.00
12 Minor Entertainment Permit $195.00
13 Regular Entertainment Permit $688.00
14 Bingo Permit $83.00
15 DUI Cost Recovery Fee (Res. 3533) Not to exceed $12,000 16 Copies of reports:  Crime Reports, Special Reports, etc. (Regardless of number of pages) $0.25 17 Copies of:  Citations, Code sections, Ordinances, etc. $0.25 18 Postage (for copies of reports, citations, code sections, etc, if over 15 pages) Current Postal Rate 19 Photographs $25.00
20 Video Tapes, Flash Drive, CD/DVD Production $67.00
21 Firearm Dealer License ‐ City Application $82.00
22 Local Firearm dealers (set by state)
23   New application set by state
24   Renewal set by state
25 Second Dealers License (set by state)
26   Application set by state
27   Renewal set by state
28 Taxi Fee per application set by state
29 Tobacco retail license $316.00
30 Cannabis Annual License Fee $2,738.00
31 Retail Cannabis Application Fee $1,843.00
32 Civil Subpoena (per case) (set by state) set by state 33 Parking Permits (separate action by the Council)
34 Neighborhoods per year $25.00
35 Village Preferential Permit $50.00
36 Village Preferential Permit ‐ Hotels/Motels    $365.00 37 Village Employer/Employee Permit $50.00
38 Morning Village Parking Permit $55.00
39 Electric Vehicle Charging Fee $2.00
574
Item 9 B.

POLICE DEPARTMENT FEES
# Description 2024‐25 Proposed Fee Schedule
40 Carrying a Concealed Weapon (CCW) Permit ‐ City Application $143.00 41 Concealed Weapon Permits (set by state)
42   Application
43     Standard set by state
44     Judicial set by state
45     Employment set by state
46   Renewal
47     Standard set by state
48     Judicial set by state
49     Employment set by state
50 Firearm Surrender Fees (set by state law)
51   1‐5 guns set by state
52   6+guns set by state
53 Administrative fee to release Impounded / Stored Vehicle $135.00 54 Surf School Permit Fee $594.00
55 Parking Permit Replacement (Lost/Stolen) $15.00
56 Boot Removal $109.00
57 Tow Hearing $143.00
575
Item 9 B.

PLANNING  FEES
Description 2024‐25 Proposed Fee Schedule
Administration/Documents
Continuance Request ‐ Applicant (2+) $150.00
Staff Billing Rate Cost
Appeals‐by Applicant Cost
Appeals‐ by City Officials $0.00
Appeals‐ by Other $1,000.00
Coastal Development Permit Appeal $0.00
Appeals ‐Building/Zoning Code Violations $1,000.00
Records Search/Research/Special Report Cost
Administrative Permits
Tree Remova l‐ Staff  Review $150.00
Tree Removal ‐‐ 3 or more trees on a property $300.00
Tree Installation Deposit (Refundable) $500.00
Tree replacement in‐lieu fee (if available) $600.00
Tree removal w/ PC approval $1,150.00
Commercial Sidewalk/Parking Lot Sale Permit $156.00
Tenant Use Permit (MCUP)‐‐Staff approval $156.00
Transient Rental Occupancy Use Permit $312.00
Home Occupation Use Permit $156.00
Fence Permit‐ Staff approval $78.00
Fence Permit‐ PC approval $1,300.00
Sidewalk vendor permit $156.00
Temporary Use Administrative Permit $156.00
Sign Permits
Temporary Signs and Banner Permits $39.00
Signs permit ‐ Staff Review $156.00
Signs  permit ‐ PC Review $630.00
Master Sign  Program Cost; $3,000 min deposit
Village Sidewalk Sign Permit $75.00
Design Permits
Residential Single Family/Minor Design Permit ‐ Staff Review $865.00 Residential Single Family ‐ PC Review $2,849.00
Residential Multi‐Family ‐ PC Review $5,000.00
Commercial ‐ PC Review $4,000.00
Accessory Dwelling Unit‐ Staff Review $420.00
Accessory Dwelling Unit‐ PC Review $1,400.00
Residential Multi‐Family/Minor Design Permit ‐ Staff Review $2,000.00 Commercial Minor Design Permit $2,000.00
Historic In‐Kind Replacement Design Permit $300.00
Sidewalk & Street Dining Desing Permit $1,000.00
Use Permits
Master Conditional Use Permit Cost; $3,500 min. deposit Conditional Use Permit/Minor Use Permit ‐ Staff Review (No fee for childcare facilities) $865.00 Conditional Use Permit ‐ PC approval Cost; $3,500 min. deposit Temporary Use Permit $103.00
Subdivisions
Tentative Parcel Map (Minor Subdivision) Cost; $3,500 min. deposit Tentative Map (Major Subdivision) Cost; $5,000 min. deposit Revised Map $2,000.00
Time Extension $2,000.00
Subdivision Modification $2,000.00
Plan Amendments
General Plan Amendment Cost; $5,000 min. deposit
Local Coastal Plan Amendment Cost; $5,000 min. deposit
Rezone Cost; $5,000 min. deposit
Planned Development Rezone Cost; $3,500 min. deposit
576
Item 9 B.

PLANNING FEES
Description 2024‐25 Proposed Fee Schedule
Other Discretionary Permits
Variance $1,199.00
PC review of minor modifications $839.00
Coastal Development Permit $633.00
Coastal Permit Exclusion $633.00
Mobile home Park Change of Use or Closure $5,000.00
Development Agreement $10,000.00
Developer agreement annual review $2,500.00
Specific Plan $5,000.00
Permit Time Extension ‐Staff Review $360.00
Permit Time Extension ‐ PC Review $1,045.00
Permit Amendment (any permit) 50% of original cost
Annexation Costs+ overhead / $5,000 min. deposit
Environmental Review
Negative Declaration (and Mitigated ND) Cost; $5,000 min deposit EIR Processing Cost; + 21% of consultant; $10,000 min deposit Mitigation/Condition Monitoring Program Cost + 21%
NEPA Compliance Cost + 21%
Other Permits/Fees
Conceptual Review Fee‐ PC $2,591.00
Conceptual Review Fee‐ PC and CC $3,533.00
Technical Study Preparation and Review Cost + 21%
NOTE: Third party review costs to be required as necessary Cost + 21% Code Compliance Double Application Fees
Code Compliance confiscated property recovery fee $206.13 Research Fee ‐ 1/2 hour minimum charge Cost
Pre‐Application Review $156.01
Building Plan Check & Final Inspection 20% of Building Permit Fee Major Development Project Fee Cost; $5,000 min. deposit Historical significance determination Cost + 21%
Inclusionary Housing
Inclusionary Housing ‐ Unit Sale $675.00
Inclusionary Housing ‐ Unit Refinance $675.00
Other Fees and Assessments
General Plan Maintenance Fee 0.75%
Information Technology Fee (Resolution No. 3786 adopted 11/12/09) 5.0% Green Building Educational Resource Fund Fee (Municipal Code 17.10.080) Fee equals .0025 times the overall building permit valuation of the project.

Affordable Housing In‐Lieu Fees
For Sale Housing Developments of two to six units (Municipal Code Chapter 18.02) :

All Units $25 per sq. ft.

For Sale Housing Developments of Seven or more units
#Units: 7 #Units Built 1 $0.00
#Units: 8‐13 #Units Built 1 Total # units minus 7 @ $25 per avg. sq. ft. per unit #Units: 14 #Units Built 2 $0.00
#Units: 15‐20 #Units Built 2 Total # units minus 14 @ $25 per avg. sq. ft. per unit #Units: 21 #Units Built 3 $0.00
#Units: 22‐27 #Units Built 3 Total # units minus 21 @ $25 per avg. sq. ft. per unit #Units: 28 #Units Built 4 $0.00
Rental Multi‐Family $6 per sq. ft.
577
Item 9 B.

PLANNING FEES
Description 2024‐25 Proposed Fee Schedule
Affordable Housing Impact Fees
For Sale Housing Developments of Six or Less Units: New housing units that are constructed to replace housing units that were demolished less than two years before the project developer applied for a permit to construct the housing development project are exempt $25 per square foot
Rental Multi‐Family $6 per square foot
Additional to Housing Units of 50% or more (charged to additional square footage only) $2.50 per square foot NOTES:

1. All Fees are non‐refundable.

2. Deposit accounts are billed on a time and material basis. Additional deposits may be necessary depending on the complexity of the project. Any
unused monies in a deposit account will be refunded following case closure.

3. The Community Development Director may reduce the total fee/deposit requirements for applications which are unlikely to require the full
deposit amounts established herein.

4. Applications which include a fee and a deposit payment will be processed with a single deposit account.

5. Outside agency fees, including but not limited to County recordation fees, State Fish and Wildlife fees, etc. are charged at cost.

6. The Community Development Director may establish a reasonable fee or deposit amount for permit types required by the Capitola Municipal Code
or State law which are not included in the fee schedule.

7. Flat fee applications are entitled up to two public hearings. Additional public hearings shall be charged to the applicant at cost

8. The Community Development Director may designate a project as a Major Development Project if it has a valuation of $2M+ or is considered technically
578
Item 9 B.

BUILDING FEES
Description 2024‐25 Proposed Fee Schedule
The cost of a “building permit”shall be the amounts shown in Table 1‐A. A “building permit” is defined as a permit for a scope of construction work regulated solely by a single model code. The model codes are the building code, the plumbing code, the mechanical code and the electrical code.

Total Valuation
$1.00 to $500.00 $29.55
$501.00 to $2,000.00 $29.55 for the first $500.00 plus $3.83 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof.
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $87.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus $17.59 for each additional $1000.00 or fraction thereof.
$25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $491.57 for the first $25,000.00 plus $12.69 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof.
$50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $808.82 for the first $50,000.00 plus $8.81 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof.
$100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,249.32 for the first $100,000.00 plus $7.05 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof.
$500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $4,069.32 for the first $500,000.00 plus $5.97 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof.
$1,000,001.00 and up $7,054.32 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $3.23 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof.

Building Permit Reinstatement Fee 50% of the original, singular building permit fee or combo building permit fee, whichever is applicable to the permit being reinstated Stop Work Order Fee 2x the singular building permit fee Greywater System Permit $0.00
Home battery permit (usually with solar) $0.00
a. Level I (120 volts) $156.00
b. Level II (208‐240 volts) $156.00
c. Level III (480 volts) $279.00
Solar P.V. System $378.00
Solar P.V. System (Commercial Sale/Distribution) $378.00 Solar Hot Water Heater $0.00
Research Fee ‐ 1/2 hour minimum charge Cost
Information Technology Fee (Resolution No. 3786 adopted 11/12/09) 3.5% Temporary Trailer/Mobile Home Occupancy Permit $279.00
Structural Review of Engineered Plans cost + 21%
Outside Consultant Plan Review cost + 21%
Grading Plan Review Fees
50 cubic yard or less $312.00
51 to 100 cubic yard $312.00
101 to 1,000 cubic yards Cost +21%
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards Cost +21%
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards 434.72for first 10,000 plus $246.53 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards
100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards 2,653.53 for first 100,000 plus $129.75 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards
200,001 cubic yards or more 5,118.87 for first 200,000 plus $71.07 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards
The cost of a “combination building permit” shall be 1.5 times the amounts shown in Table 1‐A. A “combination building permit” is defined as a permit for a scope of construction work regulated by two or more of the model codes. The model codes are the building code, the plumbing code, the mechanical code and the electrical code.

Electric Vehicle Charging Permits (* Note: These fees were added to the fee schedule for FY2011‐12, but will be waived per the Green Energy Increntive TABLE 1-A
579
Item 9 B.

BUILDING FEES
Description 2024‐25 Proposed Fee Schedule
Grading Permit Fees
50 cubic yard or less $0.00
51 to 100 cubic yard $0.00
101 to 1,000 cubic yards 189.01 for first 100 plus $27.30 for each additional 100 cubic yards 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards 434.72 for first 1,000 plus $7.30 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards 500.46 for first 10,000 plus $246.53 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards
100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards 2,719.27 for first 100,000 plus $136.33 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards
580
Item 9 B.

PARKS AND RECREATION FEES
Description 2024‐25 Proposed Fee Schedule
All fees are evaluated annually to determine if they are competitive with other recreation programs in Santa Cruz County
Classes
Activity Fee (Instructor receives 65% of this fee, Department retains 35%) Registration Fee ‐ Resident ‐ Department retains this fee $20.00 Drop‐in and Workshop Registration Fee ‐ Department retains this fee $10.00 Online Class Registration fee‐Department retains this fee 5.5% of Activity Fee Non‐Resident Fee: in addition to Registration Fee ‐ Department retains this fee $20.00 Drop‐in Activity Fee Prorated cost of Session Activity Fee Senior Discount 10% of Activity Fee
Change is registration/reservation $25.00
Negotiated Instructor of Private Tennis Lessons Activity Fee (Instructor receives 75% of this fee, Department retains 25%)
Sports
League Fees $645/team
After School
Resident/non resident $5.45/$6.18
Registration/Change Fee ‐ Resident ‐ Department retains this fee $30.00 Late Pick‐Up Fee $1.00
Parent's Night Out $25/$31
Junior Guards
Resident/non resident $303 / $378
U‐19 resident/non resident $190.00
Registration/Change Fee ‐ Resident ‐ Department retains this fee $30.00 Late Pick‐Up Fee $1.00
Regionals $103.00
Camp Capitola
*Daily rate used only to calculate program fee $34/$42
All day 2 week session, resident/non resident $336 / $420 1/2 day 2‐week session, resident/non resident $170 / $210 All day 1 week session, resident/non resident $170 / $210 All day 1 week teen session, resident/non resident $303/ $378 Junior Leader program $72.00
Registration/Change Fee ‐ Resident ‐ Department retains this fee $30.00 Late Pick‐Up Fee $1.00
Extended Care‐‐daily add on, resident/non resident $12.00 AM Extended Care‐‐per 2 week session resident/non resident or AM & PM for 1 week long session $58.00
PM Extended Care‐‐per 2 week session resident/non resident $58.00 Transportation/Lunch Break fee $63.00
Family Camp
3 night family camp Adult (13+) / Child (3‐12) $358 / $244 Rapid Weddings
Event Fee per registration $400.00
plus civil ceremony fees found in Admin Fee section Cost League fees will change depending upon number and type of leagues offered, number of 581
Item 9 B.

PARKS AND RECREATION FEES
Description 2024‐25 Proposed Fee Schedule
Facility Rentals
Field and Courts hourly rental; non profit youth groups/other non profit & Cap residents/all others $15/ $29 / $38
Jade Street Community Center
Rooms A&B hourly rent $48.00
Room C hourly rent $66.00
Patio hourly rent $9.50
Kitchen hourly rent $24.00
Entire Center hourly rent $173.00
Non profit discount of Jade Street Facility rents 25%
Community Center Deposit
1 to 50 people $110.00
51 to 150 people $276.00
151 to 250 people $554.00
Lost key fee $27.00
Event vendor fee $110.00
Staffing required to prepare for or supervise recreation activities Cost Park Rental Fees
Park Space Reservation (hourly) $10.00
Barbeque permit $10.00
Bounce House / Powered Equipment permit $60.00
Temporary Structures (more than 100 sq ft) permit $60.00 Notes: Resident include Soquel Union Elementary School District Art & Cultural
Merchandise Fee Cost + 50% administration fee
Art at the Beach Artist Booth Fee $60.00
Plein Air Artist Application Fee $50.00
Plein Air Art Exhibition service fee 30% retained by City, 70% paid to Artist Costs mean staff costs adjusted for benefits, department overhead, and City overhead as calculated by the City Manager. Costs can also mean direct cost of a consultant. When consultant costs are included 21% of such costs will be charged to cover staff time for contract Deposits are stated as minimums. Actual deposits depend on the evaluation by staff of an individual project or application. The City Manager may lower minimum deposits if the application or project justifies a lower deposit. When an application involves multiple 582
Item 9 B.

HISTORICAL MUSEUM FEES
# Description 2024‐25 Proposed Fee Schedule
1 Research Fee ‐ 1/2 hour minimum charge Cost
2 Print of an electronically available Photograph in Collection $8.00 3 Digital Copies of Collection Items $22.00
4 Scan High Resolution Tiff File of any collection item for a customer $26.00 583
Item 9 B.

MISCELLANEOUS FEES
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Appeal Fee Appeals to City Council (CMC 2.52) $593.47 NA NA $593.00 $0 2 Capitola Municipal Code $0.15 page NA NA $0.15 $0
3 Capitola Municipal Code Supplement Service (Per
year) $0.00 NA NA $0.00 $0
4 Copies:
5 1‐5 copies $0.00 NA NA $0.00 $0
6 6 or more copies (per copy) $0.25 page NA NA $0.25 $0 7 Gov’t Code § 81008 (Political Reform Act)
statements/reports  (Per copy) $0.10 page NA NA $0.10 $0 8 Simple film permit $54.49 $58.77 1% $58.00 $4
9 Major film permit $272.47 $682.37 0% $682.00 $410
10 Returned Check Fee $43.60 NA NA
$25 first
check, $35
after
‐$19
11 Business License Overpayment Refund Fee
(resolution 3532, ord 871) $0.00
(Set to ‐0‐ by
Council in
2011)
NA NA $0.00 $0
12 Business License Late Payment Penalty Admin. Fee $35.00 + 10% each month late NA NA $35.00 $0
13 Business License Application Fee (Reso. 3532) $25.00 NA NA $25.00 $0 14 Business License ‐ Disability Access and Education
Fee (State) $4.00 NA NA $4.00 $0
15 Temporary, Publicly Attended Activities,
Application Fee (Municipal Code § 9.36.040) $34.00 NA NA $34.00 $0 16 Public Art (Total Building Valuation $250,000 or
more) (Municipal Code Chapter 2.58)
2% of TBV or 1% in
lieu to City NA NA
2% of TBV or
1% in lieu to
City
$0
17 Notice of Intent to Circulate Initiative Petition
(Elections Code  § 9103(b)) $200.00 NA NA $200.00 $0
18 Outdoor Dining Rental Fees
19    Parking Spaces $3,400.00
annually for
each space
or partial
space
NA NA $3,524.78 $0
20    Sidewalks and non‐parking spaces $18.00 per square foot annually NA NA $18.66 $1
21 Outdoor Dining Maintenance Deposit
22    Sidwalks and non‐parking spaces $500.00 NA NA $500.00 $0 23    1‐2 parking spaces $1,000.00 NA NA $1,000.00 $0
24    3‐5 parking spaces $1,500.00 NA NA $1,500.00 $0
25 Notary Service Fees (State Code)
26 Acknowledgment or proof of a deed, or other
instrument, to include the seal and   writing of the
certificate
$15.00 signature NA NA $15.00 $0
27 Administering an oath or affirmation to one
person and executing the jurat, including the seal $15.00 signature NA NA $15.00 $0 28 Credit Card Transaction Fee 3% NA NA 3% $0
29 Passport Acceptance Fee $35.00 NA NA $35.00 $0
30 Marriage License New $42.79 18% $35.00 NA
31 Marriage Ceremony New City Hall ‐
$100;          $103.79 4% $100.00 NA
32 Marriage Ceremony ‐ Witness Fee New $25.75 3% $25.00 NA 584
Item 9 B.

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FEES
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Notes Fee Δ 1 Encroachment Permits
2 Application Fee New $127.07 0% $127.00 NA
3 Traffic Control Plan Review ‐ Local Street New $63.53 1% $63.00 NA 4 Traffic Control Plan Review ‐ Collector Street New $302.24 0% $302.00 NA 5 Traffic Control Plan Review ‐ Arterial Street New $453.36 0% $453.00 NA 6 Inspection ‐ Local Street New $63.53 1% $63.00 NA
7 Inspection ‐ Collector Street New $169.43 0% $169.00 NA 8 Inspection ‐ Arterial Street New $254.14 0% $254.00 NA 9 Revocable Encroachment Permit Application‐
Outdoor Dining $230.00 $1,203.08 0% $1,203.00 $973
10 Temporary (includes materials storage within right‐
of‐way road and sidewalk closures $74.85 $21.18 1% $21.00 $0 11 Village Sidewalk Sign Encroachment Permit $43.76 $206.13 0% $206.00 $162 12 Construction Parking Permit ‐ Village New daily $42.36 43% $24.00 NA 13 Construction Parking Permit ‐ City Lot New daily $42.36 72% $12.00 NA 14 Construction Parking Permit ‐ Neighborhood New monthly $42.36 41% $25.00 NA 15 Blanket Permits (repair and maintenance of
existing facilitiesm encompassing up to 20 utility
instances per year)
$2,512.68 $2,880.23 0% $2,880.00 $367
16 Revocable Encroachment for Private Improvements
17   Applications for Minor Revocable Encroachment $251.04 $422.82 0% $422.00 $171 18   Applications for Major Revocable Encroachment $628.75 $1,348.57 0% $1,348.00 $719 19 SPECIAL TRANSPORTATION PERMIT – OVERSIZE
LOAD  ‐ Single $16.00 Set by state NA NA $16.00 Set by state $0 20 SPECIAL TRANSPORTATION PERMIT – OVERSIZE
LOAD  ‐ Single $90.00 Set by state NA NA $90.00 Set by state $0 21 New Memorial Bench $1,137.47 $2,560.48 0% $2,560.00 $1,423 22 Replacement Memorial Bench $554.32 $2,509.77 0% $2,509.00 $0 23 Memorial Plaque $853.66 $598.58 0% $598.00 ‐$256
24 Replacement Plaque $277.16 $429.00 0% $429.00 $152
25 Overhead Banner (ourtisde of special event) New $144.29 0% $144.00 NA 26 Stormwater Development Review Fee
27 Application Fee $124.37 $122.45 0% $122.00 ‐$2
28 Large Project Plan Review Deposit
29 Tier 1 New $306.12 0% $306.00 NA
30 Tier 2 $3,771.32 $612.24 0% $612.00 plus deposit
($2,000) NA
31 Tier 3 & 4 $5,027.66 $612.24 0% $612.00 plus  deposit ($5,000) NA
32 Research Fee ‐ 1/2 hour minimum charge Cost NA NA Cost $0 33 Information Technology Fee (Resolution No. 3786
adopted 11/12/09) 5% of Permit Fee NA NA 5% of Permit Fee $0 34 Final Parcel Map Cost; $3,000 min.
deposit $4,143.32 0% $4,143.00 surveyor deposit ($2,500) included $0 35 Final Tract Map Cost; $3,000 min.
deposit $5,735.79 0% $5,735.00 surveyor deposit ($2,500) included $0 36 Certificate of Compliance & Lot Merger $628.87 $2,362.42 0% $2,362.00 surveyor deposit ($1,000) included $1,733
37 Boundary Line Adjustment $1,003.80 $2,362.42 0% $2,362.00 surveyor deposit ($1,000) included $1,358
38 Separate Instrument Dedication Fee New $2,710.20 0% $2,710.00 surveyor deposit ($1,000) included NA
39 Abandon Excess Public Right‐of‐Way & Public
Easement New $2,710.20 0% $2,710.00 surveyor deposit ($1,000) included NA 40 Improvement Plan Review
41 Design Permits ‐ Residential Single Family New $208.01 0% $208.00 NA 42 Design Permits ‐ Residential Multi‐
Family/Commercial New $873.57 0% $873.00 NA
43 Building Permits ‐ Residential Single Family New $347.72 0% $347.00 NA 44 Building Permits ‐ Residential Multi‐
Family/Commercial New $894.50 0% $894.00 NA
585
Item 9 B.

POLICE DEPARTMENT FEES
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Special Event Permit $67.74 $371.84 0% $371.00 $303
2 Recurring Special Event Permit ‐ Major $67.74 $632.50 0% $632.00 $564 3 New Major Special Event Permit $67.74 This requires City Council Approval $1,911.91 0% $1,911.00 $1,843
4 Neighborhood Special Event/Block Party $67.74 $195.07 0% $195.00 $127 5 Closure of Village for Special Event ‐full day New $4,584.00 0% $4,584.00 NA 6 Closure of Village for Special Event ‐half day New $2,292.00 0% $2,292.00 NA 7 Closure of Village for Special Event ‐full day
(nonprofit) New $4,584.00 40% $2,750.40 NA
8 Closure of Village for Special Event ‐half day
(nonprofit) New $2,292.00 40% $1,375.20 NA
9 Amplified Sound Permit (Municipal Code 9.12.040) $31.68 $83.49 1% $83.00 $51 10 Bandstand Rental Fee
$246 / 4 hrs or
$492 all day /
deposit $1,500
$371.84 34%
$246 / 4 hrs
or $492 all
day / deposit
$1,500
$0
11 Single Entertainment Permit $43.60 $195.07 0% $195.00 $151 12 Minor Entertainment Permit $184.19 $195.07 0% $195.00 $11 13 Regular Entertainment Permit $688.82 $688.02 0% $688.00 ‐$1 14 Bingo Permit $70.84 $83.49 1% $83.00 $12
15 DUI Cost Recovery Fee (Res. 3533) Not to exceed
$12,000 NA NA Not to exceed $12,000 $0
16 Copies of reports:  Crime Reports, Special Reports,
etc. (Regardless of number of pages) $0.25 page NA NA $0.25 $0 17 Copies of:  Citations, Code sections, Ordinances, etc. $0.25 page NA NA $0.25 $0 18 Postage (for copies of reports, citations, code
sections, etc, if over 15 pages) Current Postal Rate NA NA Current Postal Rate $0
19 Photographs $20.00 + administration
fees $30.61 18% $25.00 $5
20 Video Tapes, Flash Drive, CD/DVD Production
Cost + $57.21 1st
Hour (Minimum) +
$28.60 / hour
$68.98 3% $67.00 $10
21 Firearm Dealer License ‐ City Application $100.00 $82.57 1% $82.00 ‐$18 22 Local Firearm dealers (set by state)
23   New application set by state NA NA set by state $0 24   Renewal set by state NA NA set by state $0
25 Second Dealers License (set by state)
26   Application set by state NA NA set by state $0
27   Renewal set by state NA NA set by state $0
28 Taxi Fee per application set by state NA NA set by state $0 29 Tobacco retail license $289.36 $316.70 0% $316.00 $27 30 Cannabis Annual License Fee $2,827.19 $2,738.94 0% $2,738.00 ‐$89 31 Retail Cannabis Application Fee $1,843.02 $1,859.25 1% $1,843.00 $0 32 Civil Subpoena (per case) (set by state) set by state NA NA set by state $0 33 Parking Permits (separate action by the Council)
34 Neighborhoods per year $25.00 NA NA $25.00 $0
35 Village Preferential Permit $50.00 per year NA NA $50.00 $0 36 Village Preferential Permit ‐ Hotels/Motels    $365.00 per year NA NA $365.00 $0 37 Village Employer/Employee Permit $50.00 per year NA NA $50.00 $0 38 Morning Village Parking Permit $55.00 per year NA NA $55.00 $0 39 Electric Vehicle Charging Fee $0.50 hour NA NA $2.00 $2 40 Carrying a Concealed Weapon (CCW) Permit ‐ City
Application $115.00 $260.67 45% $143.00 $28
586
Item 9 B.

POLICE DEPARTMENT FEES
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 41 Concealed Weapon Permits (set by state)
42   Application
43     Standard set by state NA NA set by state $0
44     Judicial set by state NA NA set by state $0
45     Employment set by state NA NA set by state $0
46   Renewal
47     Standard set by state NA NA set by state $0
48     Judicial set by state NA NA set by state $0
49     Employment set by state NA NA set by state $0
50 Firearm Surrender Fees (set by state law)
51   1‐5 guns set by state NA NA set by state $0
52   6+guns set by state NA NA set by state $0
53 Administrative fee to release Impounded / Stored
Vehicle $144.98 $135.21 0% $135.00 ‐$10
54 Surf School Permit Fee $594.20 NA NA $594.00 $0
55 Parking Permit Replacement (Lost/Stolen) $15.00 Each Includes Materials $15.30 2% $15.00 $0
56 Boot Removal New
Can take 30min‐
60min,
depending on the
quantity of
tickets
$109.78 1% $109.00 NA
57 Tow Hearing New $143.41 0% $143.00 NA
587
Item 9 B.

PLANNING FEES
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 1 Administration/Documents2 Continuance Request ‐ Applicant (2+) $185.28 $156.01 4% $150.00 ‐$353 Staff Billing Rate Cost NA NA Cost $04 Appeals‐by Applicant Cost NA NA Cost $05 Appeals‐ by City Officials $0.00 $2,679.23 100% $0.00 $06 Appeals‐ by Other $593.99 $2,679.23 63% $1,000.00 $4067 Coastal Development Permit Appeal $0.00 $1,133.48 100% $0.00 $08 Appeals ‐Building/Zoning Code Violations $593.99 $2,679.23 63% $1,000.00 $4069 Records Search/Research/Special Report Cost NA NA Cost $010 Administrative Permits11 Tree Remova l‐ Staff Review $150.41 $312.02 52% $150.00 $012 Tree Removal ‐‐ 3 or more trees on a property $322.61 $624.05 52% $300.00 ‐$2313 Tree Installation Deposit (Refundable) $500.00 deposit NA NA $500.00 deposit $014 Tree replacement in‐lieu fee (if available) $600.00 per tree NA NA $600.00 per tree $015 Tree removal w/ PC approval $1,000.00 deposit $2,282.29 50% $1,150.00 deposit $15016 Commercial Sidewalk/Parking Lot Sale Permit $89.37 $156.01 0% $156.00 $6717 Tenant Use Permit (MCUP)‐‐Staff approval $90.46 $156.01 0% $156.00 $6618 Transient Rental Occupancy Use Permit $628.87 $312.02 0% $312.00 ‐$31719 Home Occupation Use Permit $188.55 $156.01 0% $156.00 ‐$3320 Fence Permit‐ Staff approval $50.14 $78.01 0% $78.00 $2821 Fence Permit‐ PC approval $942.76 $1,313.05 1% $1,300.00 $35722 Sidewalk vendor permit $138.42 $156.01 0% $156.00 $1823 Temporary Use Administrative Permit $90.46 $156.01 0% $156.00 $6624 Sign Permits25 Temporary Signs and Banner Permits $44.69 $39.00 0% $39.00 ‐$626 Signs permit ‐ Staff Review $151.50 $156.01 0% $156.00 $527 Signs permit ‐ PC Review $628.87 $1,001.03 37% $630.00 $128 Master Sign Program Cost; $3,000 min deposit NA NA Cost; $3,000 min deposit $029 Village Sidewalk Sign Permit $77.38 $78.01 4% $75.00 ‐$230 Design Permits31 Residential Single Family/Minor Design Permit ‐ Staff Review $918.78 $865.60 0% $865.00 ‐$5432 Residential Single Family ‐ PC Review $3,143.26 $2,849.03 0% $2,849.00 ‐$29433 Residential Multi‐Family ‐ PC Review $4,397.74 NA NA $5,000.00 deposit $60234 Commercial ‐ PC Review $4,000.00 deposit NA NA $4,000.00 deposit $035 Accessory Dwelling Unit‐ Staff Review $628.87 $432.80 3% $420.00 ‐$209 588
Item 9 B.

PLANNING FEES
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 36 Accessory Dwelling Unit‐ PC Review $1,886.61 $1,457.76 4% $1,400.00 ‐$48737 Residential Multi‐Family/Minor Design Permit ‐ Staff Review $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $2,000.00 deposit $038 Commercial Minor Design Permit $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $2,000.00 deposit $039 Historic In‐Kind Replacement Design Permit $500.00 deposit $309.20 3% $300.00 deposit ‐$20040 Sidewalk & Street Dining Desing Permit $1,000.00 deposit $1,045.50 4% $1,000.00 flat $0 41 Use Permits
42 Master Conditional Use Permit Cost; $3,500 min. deposit NA NA Cost; $3,500 min. deposit deposit $0 43 Conditional Use Permit/Minor Use Permit ‐ Staff Review (No fee for childcare facilities) $1,853.92 $865.60 0% $865.00 ‐$98944 Conditional Use Permit ‐ PC approval Cost; $3,000 min. deposit NA NA Cost; $3,500 min. deposit deposit $500 45 Temporary Use Permit $93.73 $103.07 0% $103.00 $946 Subdivisions 47 Tentative Parcel Map (Minor Subdivision) Cost; $2,000 min. deposit NA NA Cost; $3,500 min. deposit $1,50048 Tentative Map (Major Subdivision) Cost; $5,000 min. deposit NA NA Cost; $5,000 min. deposit $049 Revised Map $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $2,000.00 deposit $050 Time Extension $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $2,000.00 deposit $051 Subdivision Modification $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $2,000.00 deposit $052 Plan Amendments53 General Plan Amendment Cost; $5,000 min. deposit NA NA Cost; $5,000 min. deposit $054 Local Coastal Plan Amendment Cost; $5,000 min. deposit NA NA Cost; $5,000 min. deposit $055 Rezone Cost; $5,000 min. deposit NA NA Cost; $5,000 min. deposit $056 Planned Development Rezone Cost; $3,500 min. deposit NA NA Cost; $3,500 min. deposit $057 Other Discretionary Permits58 Variance $1,886.61 $1,199.97 0% $1,199.00 ‐$68859 PC review of minor modifications $1,695.88 $839.36 0% $839.00 ‐$85760 Coastal Development Permit $942.76 $633.23 0% $633.00 ‐$31061 Coastal Permit Exclusion $105.72 $633.23 0% $633.00 $52762 Mobile home Park Change of Use or Closure $5,000.00 deposit NA NA $5,000.00 deposit $0 589
Item 9 B.

PLANNING FEES
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 63 Development Agreement $10,000.00 min deposit NA NA $10,000.00 min deposit $064 Developer agreement annual review $2,500.00 deposit NA NA $2,500.00 deposit $065 Specific Plan Cost; $5,000 min. deposit NA NA $5,000.00 $066 Permit Time Extension ‐Staff Review $628.87 $360.61 0% $360.00 ‐$26967 Permit Time Extension ‐ PC Review $1,886.61 $1,045.50 0% $1,045.00 ‐$842 68 Permit Amendment (any permit) 50% of original cost NA NA 50% of original cost $0 69 Annexation Costs+ overhead / $3,000 min. deposit NA NA Costs+ overhead / $5,000 min. deposit $2,00070 Environmental Review71 Negative Declaration (and Mitigated ND) Cost; $2,000 min deposit NA NA Cost; $5,000 min deposit $3,00072 EIR Processing Cost; + 21% of consultant; $10,000 min deposit
NA NA
Cost; + 21% of consultant; $10,000 min deposit
$0
73 Mitigation/Condition Monitoring Program Cost + 21% NA NA Cost + 21% $074 NEPA Compliance Cost + 21% NA NA Cost + 21% $075 Other Permits/Fees76 Conceptual Review Fee‐ PC $1,886.61 $2,591.24 0% $2,591.00 $70477 Conceptual Review Fee‐ PC and CC $2,828.28 $3,533.43 0% $3,533.00 $70578 Technical Study Preparation and Review Cost + 21% NA NA Cost + 21% $079 NOTE: Third party review costs to be required as necessary
Cost + 21% NA NA Cost + 21% $0
80 Code Compliance Double Application Fees NA NA Double Application Fees $081 Code Compliance confiscated property recovery fee $297.54 $206.13 0% $206.13 ‐$9182 Research Fee ‐ 1/2 hour minimum charge Cost NA NA Cost $083 Pre‐Application Review $263.76 $156.01 0% $156.01 ‐$10884 Building Plan Check & Final Inspection 20% of Building Permit Fee NA NA 20% of Building Permit Fee $0 590
Item 9 B.

PLANNING FEES
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 85 Major Development Project Fee Cost; $5,000 min. deposit NA NA Cost; $5,000 min. deposit $086 Historical significance determination $4,250.00 deposit NA NA Cost + 21% NA87 Inclusionary Housing88 Inclusionary Housing ‐ Unit Sale $628.87 $675.92 0% $675.00 $4689 Inclusionary Housing ‐ Unit Refinance $251.77 $675.92 0% $675.00 $42390 Other Fees and Assessments91 General Plan Maintenance Fee 0.5% of Total Building Valuation 0.78% 3% 0.75% of Total Building Valuation 0.25% 92 Information Technology Fee (Resolution No. 3786 adopted 11/12/09) 5% of Permit Fee NA NA 5.0% 0%93 Green Building Educational Resource Fund Fee (Municipal Code 17.10.080) Fee equals .0025 times the overall building permit valuation of the project.

NA NA
Fee equals .0025 times the overall building permit valuation of the project. $0
94 Affordable Housing In‐Lieu Fees
95 For Sale Housing Developments of two to six units (Municipal Code Chapter 18.02) :96 All Units $25 per sq. ft. NA NA $25 per sq. ft. $097 For Sale Housing Developments of Seven or more units98 #Units: 7 #Units Built 1 $0.00 NA NA $0.00 $099 #Units: 8‐13 #Units Built 1 Total # units minus 7 @ $25 per avg. sq. ft. per unit
NA NA
Total # units minus 7 @ $25 per avg. sq. ft. per unit
$0
100 #Units: 14 #Units Built 2 $0.00 NA NA $0.00 $0101 #Units: 15‐20 #Units Built 2 Total # units minus 14 @ $25 per avg. sq. ft. per unit
NA NA
Total # units minus 14 @ $25 per avg. sq. ft. per unit
$0
102 #Units: 21 #Units Built 3 $0.00 NA NA $0.00 $0103 #Units: 22‐27 #Units Built 3 Total # units minus 21 @ $25 per avg. sq. ft. per unit
NA NA
Total # units minus 21 @ $25 per avg. sq. ft. per unit
$0
591
Item 9 B.

PLANNING FEES
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 104 #Units: 28 #Units Built 4 $0.00 NA NA $0.00 $0105 Rental Multi‐Family $6 per sq. ft. NA NA $6 per sq. ft. $0106 Affordable Housing Impact Fees107 For Sale Housing Developments of Six or Less Units: New housing units that are constructed to replace housing units that were demolished less than two years before the project developer applied for a permit to construct the housing development project are exempt $25 per square foot NA NA $25 per square foot $0
108 Rental Multi‐Family $6 per square foot NA NA $6 per square foot $0109 Additional to Housing Units of 50% or more (charged to additional square footage only) $2.50 per square foot NA NA $2.50 per square foot $0 NOTES:1. All Fees are non‐refundable. 2. Deposit accounts are billed on a time and material basis. Additional deposits may be necessary depending on the complexity of the project. Any unused monies in a deposit account will be refunded following case closure.

3. The Community Development Director may reduce the total fee/deposit requirements for applications which are unlikely to require the full deposit amounts established herein.

4. Applications which include a fee and a deposit payment will be processed with a single deposit account.5. Outside agency fees, including but not limited to County recordation fees, State Fish and Wildlife fees, etc. are charged at cost.6. The Community Development Director may establish a reasonable fee or deposit amount for permit types required by the Capitola Municipal Code or State law which are not included in the fee schedule.

7. Flat fee applications are entitled up to two public hearings. Additional public hearings shall be charged to the applicant at cost8. The Community Development Director may designate a project as a Major Development Project if it has a valuation of $2M+ or is considered technically 592
Item 9 B.

BUILDING FEES
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 1 2
3 Building Plan Check Fee 65% of Building Permit Fee NA NA 65% of Building Permit Fee $0 4 Reinspection Fee $0.00 $189.01 0% $189.00 $189
5 Resubmitted Plan Check Fee $122.30 hr $189.01 0% $189.00 hr $67 6 Building Permit Extension Fee $0.00 $287.62 0% $287.00 $287 7 Building Permit Reinstatement Fee
50% of the original, singular building permit
fee or combo building permit fee, whichever is
applicable to the permit being reinstated
NA NA
50% of the original, singular building permit fee
or combo building permit fee, whichever is
applicable to the permit being reinstated
$0
8 Stop Work Order Fee 2x the singular building permit fee NA NA 2x the singular building permit fee $0 9 Greywater System Permit $0.00 NA NA $0.00 $0
10 Home battery permit (usually with solar) $0.00 NA NA $0.00 $0 11 12 a. Level I (120 volts) $0.00 $156.14 0% $156.00 $156 13 b. Level II (208‐240 volts) $0.00 $156.14 0% $156.00 $156 14 c. Level III (480 volts) $0.00 $279.40 0% $279.00 $279 15 Solar P.V. System $0.00 $378.01 0% $378.00 $378
16 Solar P.V. System (Commercial Sale/Distribution) $0.00 $378.01 0% $378.00 $378 17 Solar Hot Water Heater $0.00 $156.14 100% $0.00 $0
18 Research Fee ‐ 1/2 hour minimum charge Cost NA NA Cost $0 19 Information Technology Fee (Resolution No. 3786
adopted 11/12/09) 5% of Permit Fee 3.6% 2% 3.5% ‐2%
20 Temporary Trailer/Mobile Home Occupancy Permit $0.00 $279.40 0% $279.00 $279 21 Structural Review of Engineered Plans cost + 21% NA NA cost + 21% $0 22 Outside Consultant Plan Review cost + 21% NA NA cost + 21% $0 23 Grading Plan Review Fees
24 50 cubic yard or less $0.00 $312.27 0% $312.00 $312
25 51 to 100 cubic yard $0.00 $312.27 0% $312.00 $312
26 101 to 1,000 cubic yards $0.00 NA NA Cost +21% NA
27 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards $0.00 NA NA Cost +21% NA 28 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards $60.36
for first 10,000 plus
$30.81 for each
additional 10,000
cubic yards
$434.72 0% $434.72
for first 10,000 plus
$246.53 for each
additional 10,000 cubic
yards
$374
29 100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards $337.69
for first 100,000 plus
$16.65 for each
additional 10,000
cubic yards
$2,653.53 0% $2,653.53
for first 100,000 plus
$129.75 for each
additional 10,000 cubic
yards
$2,316
30 200,001 cubic yards or more $487.57
for first 200,000 plus
$9.12 for each
additional 10,000
cubic yards
$5,118.87 0% $5,118.87
for first 200,000 plus
$71.07 for each
additional 10,000 cubic
yards
$4,631
31 Grading Permit Fees
32 50 cubic yard or less $0.00 $156.14 100% $0.00 $0
33 51 to 100 cubic yard $0.00 $156.14 100% $0.00 $0
34 101 to 1,000 cubic yards $46.51
for first 100 plus
$22.01 for each
additional 100 cubic
yards
$189.01 0% $189.01
for first 100 plus $27.30
for each additional 100
cubic yards
$142
35 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards $244.60
for first 1,000 plus
$18.23 for each
additional 1,000 cubic
yards
$434.72 0% $434.72
for first 1,000 plus $7.30
for each additional
1,000 cubic yards
$190
36 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards $408.67
for first 10,000 plus
$82.97 for each
additional 10,000
cubic yards
$500.46 0% $500.46
for first 10,000 plus
$246.53 for each
additional 10,000 cubic
yards
$92
37 100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards $1,155.40
for first 100,000 plus
$45.88 for each
additional 10,000
cubic yards
$2,719.27 0% $2,719.27
for first 100,000 plus
$136.33 for each
additional 10,000 cubic
yards
$1,564
The cost of a “combination building permit” shall be 1.5 times the amounts shown in Table 1‐A. A “combination building permit” is defined as a permit for a scope of construction work regulated by two or more of the model codes. The model codes are the building code, the plumbing code, the mechanical code and the electrical code.

The cost of a “building permit”shall be the amounts shown in Table 1‐A. A “building permit” is defined as a permit for a scope of construction work regulated solely by a single model code. The model codes are the building code, the plumbing code, the mechanical code and the electrical code.

Electric Vehicle Charging Permits (* Note: These fees were added to the fee schedule for FY2011‐12, but will be waived per the Green Energy Increntive Program)
593
Item 9 B.

PARKS AND RECREATION FEES
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 All fees are evaluated annually to determine if they are competitive with other recreation programs in Santa Cruz County 2 Classes
3 Activity Fee (Instructor receives 65% of this fee, Department retains 35%) 4 Registration Fee ‐ Resident ‐ Department retains
this fee $20.06 $29.93 33% $20.00 $0
5 Drop‐in and Workshop Registration Fee ‐
Department retains this fee $9.50 $14.97 33% $10.00 $1
6 Online Class Registration fee‐Department retains
this fee 5.5% of Activity Fee NA NA 5.5% of Activity Fee $0 7 Non‐Resident Fee: in addition to Registration Fee ‐
Department retains this fee $16.90 $29.93 33% $20.00 $3 8 Drop‐in Activity Fee Prorated cost of
Session Activity Fee NA NA
Prorated cost
of Session
Activity Fee
$0
9 Senior Discount 10% of Activity Fee NA NA 10% of
Activity Fee $0
10 Change is registration/reservation New changing registered sessions or reservation details $29.93 16% $25.00 NA 11 Negotiated Instructor of Private Tennis Lessons Activity Fee (Instructor receives 75% of this fee, Department retains 25%) 12 Sports
13 League Fees Costs + 30% admin
fee NA NA $645/team NA
14 15 After School
16 Resident/non resident $5.45/$6.18 per hour   *Hourly rate used only to calculate monthly fee amount    * Scholarships may be available NA NA $5.45/$6.18 $0 17 Registration/Change Fee ‐ Resident ‐ Department
retains this fee New $30.00 0% $30.00 NA
18 Late Pick‐Up Fee $1.00 per minute NA NA $1.00 $0
19 Parent's Night Out $25/$31 NA NA $25/$31 $0
20 Junior Guards * Scholarships may be available
21 Resident/non resident $303 / $378 NA NA $303 / $378 $0 22 U‐19 resident/non resident $190.00 NA NA $190.00 $0
23 Registration/Change Fee ‐ Resident ‐ Department
retains this fee New $30.00 0% $30.00 NA
24 Late Pick‐Up Fee $1.00 per minute NA NA $1.00 $0
25 Regionals $103.00 NA NA $103.00 $0
26 Camp Capitola * Scholarships may be available
27 *Daily rate used only to calculate program fee $34/$42 NA NA $34/$42 $0 28   All day 2 week session, resident/non resident $336 / $420 NA NA $336 / $420 $0 29         1/2 day 2‐week session, resident/non resident $170 / $210 NA NA $170 / $210 $0 30   All day 1 week session, resident/non resident $170 / $210 NA NA $170 / $210 $0 31   All day 1 week teen session, resident/non
resident $303/ $378 NA NA $303/ $378 $0
32 Junior Leader program $72.86 NA NA $72.00 ‐$1
33 Registration/Change Fee ‐ Resident ‐ Department
retains this fee New $30.00 0% $30.00 NA
34 Late Pick‐Up Fee $1.00 per minute NA NA $1.00 $0
35   Extended Care‐‐daily add on, resident/non
resident $12.67 NA NA $12.00 ‐$1
36 AM Extended Care‐‐per 2 week session
resident/non resident                                             or AM & PM for 1 week long session
$58.08 NA NA $58.00 $0
37   PM Extended Care‐‐per 2 week session
resident/non resident $58.08 NA NA $58.00 $0
38 Transportation/Lunch Break fee $63.36 NA NA $63.00 $0 39 Family Camp
40    3 night family camp    Adult (13+)  /  Child (3‐12) $358  /  $244 per night NA NA $358  /  $244 $0 41 Rapid Weddings * Scholarships may be available
42 Event Fee per registration New $709.84 44% $400.00 NA 43 plus civil ceremony fees found in Admin Fee
section New NA NA Cost NA
44 Facility Rentals
45   Field and Courts hourly rental; non profit youth
groups/other non profit & Cap residents/all others $15/ $29 / $38 NA NA $15/ $29 / $38 $0 46 Jade Street Community Center
47     Rooms A&B hourly rent $48.58 NA NA $48.00 ‐$1
48     Room C hourly rent $66.53 NA NA $66.00 ‐$1
49     Patio hourly rent $9.50 NA NA $9.50 $0
50     Kitchen hourly rent $24.29 NA NA $24.00 $0
51     Entire Center hourly rent $173.18 NA NA $173.00 $0 League fees will change depending upon number and type of leagues offered, number of games per league, number of officials, amount of equipment needed, field/site prep and maintenance, and whether or not playoffs & awards are offered.  Fees are calculated based on direct costs + 30% admin fee.
594
Item 9 B.

PARKS AND RECREATION FEES
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 52     Non profit discount of Jade Street Facility rents 25% NA NA 25% $0 53 Community Center Deposit
54     1 to 50 people $110.88 NA NA $110.00 ‐$1
55     51 to 150 people $276.67 NA NA $276.00 ‐$1
56     151 to 250 people $554.40 NA NA $554.00 $0
57     Lost key fee $27.46 NA NA $27.00 $0
58 Event vendor fee $110.88 NA NA $110.00 ‐$1
59 Staffing required to prepare for or supervise
recreation activities Cost NA NA Cost $0
60 Park Rental Fees
61 Park Space Reservation (hourly) $10.00 NA NA $10.00 $0 62 Barbeque permit $10.00 NA NA $10.00 $0
63 Bounce House / Powered Equipment permit $60.00 NA NA $60.00 $0 64 Temporary Structures (more than 100 sq ft) permit $60.00 NA NA $60.00 $0 65 Notes: Resident include Soquel Union Elementary School District 66 67
68 Art & Cultural
69 Merchandise Fee Cost + 50%
administration fee NA NA
Cost + 50%
administratio
n fee
$0
70 Art at the Beach Artist Booth Fee New NA NA $60.00
71 Plein Air Artist Application Fee $50.00 NA NA $50.00 $0 72 Plein Air Art Exhibition service fee
30% retained by
City, 70% paid to
Artist
NA NA
30% retained
by City, 70%
paid to Artist
$0
Costs mean staff costs adjusted for benefits, department overhead, and City overhead as calculated by the City Manager.  Costs can also mean direct cost of a consultant.  When consultant costs are included 21% of such costs will be charged to cover staff time for contract management.

Staff costs do not accrue during an appeal unless appeal is made by applicant.

Deposits are stated as minimums. Actual deposits depend on the evaluation by staff of an individual project or application. The City Manager may lower minimum deposits if the application or project justifies a lower deposit. When an application involves multiple minimum fees the highest minimum fee applies.
595
Item 9 B.

HISTORICAL MUSEUM FEES
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Research Fee ‐ 1/2 hour minimum charge Cost NA NA Cost $0 2 Print of an electronically available Photograph in
Collection $8.00 NA NA $8.00 $0
3 Digital Copies of Collection Items $22.00 NA NA $22.00 $0 4 Scan High Resolution Tiff File of any collection item for a customer $26.00 NA NA $26.00 $0
596
Item 9 B.

Proposed
City Fee Schedule
Fiscal Year 2024-25
November 14, 2024
597
Item 9 B.

Background
• Annual Fee Schedule Update: – Reflect current service costs – Maintain cost recovery goals • Comprehensive Fee Study – Conducted by Willdan Financial Services 598
Item 9 B.

Purpose of the Fee Study
• Determine actual cost of City services
• Recommend cost recovery rates
• Account for: – Inflation – Salary increases – Service delivery changes – Add/remove fees for new/discontinued services • Address fees below full cost recovery to reduce General Fund dependency
599
Item 9 B.

Legal Considerations
• State Law Compliance: – Fees cannot exceed the cost of providing services – California Propositions 218 and 26 restrict fee amounts 600
Item 9 B.

Recommended Adjustments
• Public Works Department – Increased fees for traffic control plan reviews, construction parking permits, and stormwater development reviews – Introduction of new inspection and permit fees • Police Department – Increase for special event permits, sound permits, etc. – New fees introduced for vehicle boot removal, tow hearings, and other services
601
Item 9 B.

Recommended Adjustments
• Planning Division – Several fees decreasing – New fees for complex applications and environmental reviews – Childcare Facilities: Fees set to zero per Council request • Building Division – Building plan checks and inspection fees adjusted for larger projects – New fees for permit extensions and reinstatements – New fees for Electric Vehicle Charging Permits & Solar P.V.

Systems
• No fee for solar hot water heater
602
Item 9 B.

Recommended Adjustments
• Community Services and Recreation Department – 2% increase for facility rentals – No increase in youth program registration fees • New fee for registration/reservation cancellation or
change
• Other Adjustments – Historical Museum: No changes – Outdoor Dining Space Rent: Increased by 3.67% CPI adjustment (from $1.50 to $1.56 per sq. ft.)
603
Item 9 B.

Staff Recommendation
Conduct public hearing Adopt the proposed
FY 2024-25
City Fee Schedule
604
Item 9 B.

Capitola City CouncilNovember 14, 2024

Capitola City Council
November 14, 2024