2023-06-20; City Council; 15; Approving the preferred design option for the South Carlsbad Boulevard Climate Adaptation Study — Carlsbad City Council, June 20, 2023 (part 3 of 3)

Movement SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 425 8
Future Volume (veh/h) 425 8
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 443 8
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1593 710
Arrive On Green 0.45 0.45
Sat Flow, veh/h 3554 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 443 8
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 0.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 0.2
Prop In Lane 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1593 710
V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.01
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1800 803
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.3 10.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.1
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.4 10.0
LnGrp LOS B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 674
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.1
Approach LOS B
Timer - Assigned Phs
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 443 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future 2050 NonSummer WE_Midday 12: Carlsbad Blvd & Island Way 11/28/2022
Scenario 1 12:32 pm 08/10/2022 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 10 ends

HCM 6th Edition methodology does not support clustered intersections.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 444 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future 2050 NonSummer WE_Midday 16: 11/28/2022
Scenario 1 12:32 pm 08/10/2022 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 11 ends

HCM 6th Edition methodology does not support clustered intersections.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 445 of 647
South Carlsbad Boulevard Coastal Project- Transportation Assessment 6 ExEcutiv E Summary
Appendix E
Option 1 HCM Worksheets
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 446 of 647

Option 1 Summer Conditions

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 447 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_AM 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Solamar Dr 11/28/2022
AM 12:32 pm 08/10/2022 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 47 32 316 29 6 40 379
Future Volume (veh/h) 8 47 32 316 29 6 40 379
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 0.96 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 51 343 32 43 412
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 18 102 2465 228 57 2922
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.08 0.75 0.75 0.01 0.27
Sat Flow, veh/h 232 1315 3367 303 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 61 0 185 190 43 412
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1573 0 1777 1800 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 0.0 3.4 3.5 2.9 10.5
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 0.0 3.4 3.5 2.9 10.5
Prop In Lane 0.15 0.84 0.17 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 122 0 1338 1355 57 2922
V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.76 0.14
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 446 0 1338 1355 764 2922
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.1 0.0 4.1 4.1 58.9 11.6
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 18.0 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.9 0.0 1.2 1.2 1.6 4.9
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.2 0.0 4.3 4.3 76.9 11.7
LnGrp LOS E A A A E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 61 375 455
Approach Delay, s/veh 56.2 4.3 17.9
Approach LOS E A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.3 96.3 104.7 15.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 51.5 18.0 63.0 34.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.9 5.5 12.5 6.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.7 3.1 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.8
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 448 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_AM 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Island Way 11/28/2022
AM 12:32 pm 08/10/2022 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 0 15 17 0 20 15 325 13 39 10 356 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 0 15 17 0 20 15 325 13 39 10 356 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 0 16 18 0 22 16 353 14 11 387
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 31 0 0 152 0 49 31 2750 109 23 2789
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.03 0.03 1.00 1.00 0.01 0.78 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 16 1781 0 1585 1781 3485 138 1781 3647 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 71.5 18 0 22 16 180 187 11 387
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 E 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1846 1781 1777 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 1.1 0.0 1.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 3.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 1.1 0.0 1.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 3.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 31 152 0 49 31 1402 1457 23 2789 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.12 0.00 0.45 0.52 0.13 0.13 0.48 0.14 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 215 215 0 271 215 1402 1457 334 2789 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 58.5 50.7 0.0 57.2 57.4 0.0 0.0 58.8 3.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.0 0.3 0.0 6.4 13.0 0.2 0.2 14.7 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 71.5 51.0 0.0 63.6 70.5 0.2 0.2 73.5 3.2 LnGrp LOS E D A E E A A E A
Approach Vol, veh/h 40 383 398
Approach Delay, s/veh 58.0 3.1 5.2
Approach LOS E A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.0 99.2 14.7 6.6 98.7 6.6 8.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.5 44.5 14.5 14.5 52.5 14.5 20.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 2.0 3.1 3.1 5.2 3.1 3.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.0
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 449 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_AM 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Island Way 11/28/2022
AM 12:32 pm 08/10/2022 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 3 ends

Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0
Future Volume (veh/h) 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0
Cap, veh/h 0
Arrive On Green 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0
LnGrp LOS A
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
Timer - Assigned Phs
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 450 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_AM 10: Carlsbad Blvd & Breakwater Rd 11/28/2022
AM 12:32 pm 08/10/2022 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 4 ends

HCM 6th Edition cannot analyze u-turn movements.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 451 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_AM 101: Parking Lot & Carlsbad Blvd 11/28/2022
AM 12:32 pm 08/10/2022 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 5 ends

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 714 6 6 436 6 6
Future Volume (veh/h) 714 6 6 436 6 6
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 776 7 7 474 7 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 858 727 112 858 368 368
Arrive On Green 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.47 0.47
Sat Flow, veh/h 1870 1585 695 1870 788 788
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 776 7 7 474 15 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1870 1585 695 1870 1689 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 46.1 0.3 1.1 22.1 0.6 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 46.1 0.3 47.2 22.1 0.6 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.47 0.47
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 858 727 112 858 788 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.90 0.01 0.06 0.55 0.02 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1426 1209 323 1426 788 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.0 17.7 51.9 23.5 17.2 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.1 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 21.3 0.1 0.2 9.8 0.2 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.1 17.7 52.1 24.1 17.3 0.0
LnGrp LOS D B D C B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 783 481 15
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.0 24.5 17.3
Approach LOS C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 60.5 59.5 59.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 91.5 91.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 48.1 49.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.0 3.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.8
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 452 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_AM 102: Carlsbad Blvd & Palomar Airport Road 11/28/2022
AM 12:32 pm 08/10/2022 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 6 ends

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 151 225 216 153 368 352
Future Volume (veh/h) 151 225 216 153 368 352
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 164 245 235 166 400 383
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 311 277 947 642 437 2667
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.25 0.75
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 2120 1374 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 164 245 205 196 400 383
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1585 1777 1623 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 10.0 18.1 12.2 12.8 26.2 3.6
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.0 18.1 12.2 12.8 26.2 3.6
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 311 277 831 759 437 2667
V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.89 0.25 0.26 0.91 0.14
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 408 363 831 759 764 2667
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.0 48.4 32.2 32.4 44.0 4.2
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.4 18.2 0.7 0.8 9.0 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.6 8.5 6.0 5.7 12.6 1.2
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.4 66.5 32.9 33.2 53.1 4.3
LnGrp LOS D E C C D A
Approach Vol, veh/h 409 401 783
Approach Delay, s/veh 58.5 33.0 29.2
Approach LOS E C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 34.0 60.6 94.6 25.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 51.5 27.5 83.5 27.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 28.2 14.8 5.6 20.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 2.0 2.9 0.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 37.7
HCM 6th LOS D
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 453 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_PM 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Solamar Dr 11/28/2022
PM 8:22 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 31 31 773 14 8 25 552
Future Volume (veh/h) 10 31 31 773 14 8 25 552
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 0.96 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 11 34 840 15 27 600
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 25 79 2750 49 44 2960
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.07 0.77 0.77 0.01 0.27
Sat Flow, veh/h 380 1174 3662 64 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 46 0 418 437 27 600
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1589 0 1777 1856 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 3.3 0.0 8.5 8.5 1.8 15.6
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.3 0.0 8.5 8.5 1.8 15.6
Prop In Lane 0.24 0.74 0.03 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 107 0 1369 1430 44 2960
V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.61 0.20
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 450 0 1369 1430 527 2960
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.96 0.96 0.95 0.95
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.8 0.0 4.1 4.1 58.9 12.9
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.7 0.0 0.6 0.5 12.4 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.4 0.0 2.8 2.9 1.0 7.5
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.5 0.0 4.7 4.7 71.3 13.1
LnGrp LOS E A A A E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 46 855 627
Approach Delay, s/veh 56.5 4.7 15.6
Approach LOS E A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.5 98.5 106.0 14.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.5 34.0 63.0 34.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.8 10.5 17.6 5.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.8 4.7 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.7
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 454 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_PM 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Island Way 11/28/2022
PM 8:22 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 0 15 30 0 20 15 765 28 52 20 499 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 0 15 30 0 20 15 765 28 52 20 499 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 0 16 33 0 22 16 832 30 22 542
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 31 0 0 160 0 55 31 2715 98 39 2774
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.04 0.03 1.00 1.00 0.02 0.78 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 16 1781 0 1585 1781 3498 126 1781 3647 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 71.5 33 0 22 16 423 439 22 542
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 E 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1848 1781 1777 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 2.1 0.0 1.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.5 4.7
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 2.1 0.0 1.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.5 4.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 31 160 0 55 31 1379 1434 39 2774 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.21 0.00 0.40 0.52 0.31 0.31 0.57 0.20 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 126 160 0 258 126 1379 1434 260 2774 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.94 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 58.5 50.7 0.0 56.7 57.4 0.0 0.0 58.1 3.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.0 0.6 0.0 4.5 12.7 0.6 0.5 11.9 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 1.0 0.0 0.7 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.8 1.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 71.5 51.3 0.0 61.2 70.1 0.6 0.5 70.0 3.6 LnGrp LOS E D A E E A A E A
Approach Vol, veh/h 55 878 564
Approach Delay, s/veh 55.2 1.8 6.1
Approach LOS E A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.1 97.6 15.3 6.6 98.2 6.6 8.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.5 56.5 9.5 8.5 65.5 8.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 2.0 4.1 3.1 6.7 3.1 3.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.1
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 455 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_PM 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Island Way 11/28/2022
PM 8:22 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 3 ends

Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0
Future Volume (veh/h) 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0
Cap, veh/h 0
Arrive On Green 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0
LnGrp LOS A
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
Timer - Assigned Phs
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 456 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_PM 10: Carlsbad Blvd & Breakwater Rd 11/28/2022
PM 8:22 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 4 ends

HCM 6th Edition cannot analyze u-turn movements.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 457 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_PM 101: Parking Lot & Carlsbad Blvd 11/28/2022
PM 8:22 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 5 ends

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 684 11 11 879 11 11
Future Volume (veh/h) 684 11 11 879 11 11
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 743 12 12 955 12 12
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1045 885 252 1045 296 296
Arrive On Green 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.37 0.37
Sat Flow, veh/h 1870 1585 717 1870 809 809
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 743 12 12 955 25 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1870 1585 717 1870 1684 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 34.9 0.4 1.5 55.3 1.1 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 34.9 0.4 36.4 55.3 1.1 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.48 0.48
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1045 885 252 1045 617 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.01 0.05 0.91 0.04 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1426 1209 398 1426 617 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.4 11.8 32.7 23.9 24.4 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 0.1 7.4 0.1 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 14.9 0.1 0.3 25.2 0.5 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.5 11.8 32.8 31.3 24.6 0.0
LnGrp LOS C B C C C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 755 967 25
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.3 31.4 24.6
Approach LOS C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 48.5 71.5 71.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 91.5 91.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 36.9 57.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.6 9.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.5
HCM 6th LOS C
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 458 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_PM 102: Carlsbad Blvd & Palomar Airport Road 11/28/2022
PM 8:22 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 6 ends

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 186 319 571 240 291 405
Future Volume (veh/h) 186 319 571 240 291 405
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 202 347 621 261 316 440
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 408 363 1126 473 350 2473
Arrive On Green 0.23 0.23 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.70
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 2532 1024 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 202 347 452 430 316 440
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1585 1777 1686 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 11.8 25.9 28.3 28.3 20.8 5.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.8 25.9 28.3 28.3 20.8 5.2
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.61 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 408 363 821 779 350 2473
V/C Ratio(X) 0.49 0.96 0.55 0.55 0.90 0.18
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 408 363 821 779 527 2473
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.2 45.6 39.3 39.4 47.1 6.3
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 35.6 2.4 2.6 13.6 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.3 13.7 14.0 13.4 10.5 1.9
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.1 81.2 41.8 41.9 60.7 6.5
LnGrp LOS D F D D E A
Approach Vol, veh/h 549 882 756
Approach Delay, s/veh 66.5 41.9 29.1
Approach LOS E D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.1 59.9 88.0 32.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.5 43.5 83.5 27.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.8 30.3 7.2 27.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 4.8 3.3 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 43.6
HCM 6th LOS D
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 459 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_WE Mid 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Solamar Dr 11/10/2022
WE Mid 8:45 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 11 68 52 813 15 10 33 777
Future Volume (veh/h) 11 68 52 813 15 10 33 777
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 0.96 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 74 884 16 36 845
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 21 131 2518 46 56 2781
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.71 0.71 0.01 0.26
Sat Flow, veh/h 218 1342 3661 65 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 87 0 440 460 36 845
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1578 0 1777 1855 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 5.3 0.0 9.7 9.7 2.0 19.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.3 0.0 9.7 9.7 2.0 19.1
Prop In Lane 0.14 0.85 0.03 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 154 0 1254 1310 56 2781
V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.64 0.30
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 536 0 1254 1310 383 2781
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.94
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.1 0.0 5.7 5.7 48.9 15.2
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 0.0 0.7 0.7 10.8 0.3
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.2 0.0 3.4 3.5 1.1 9.1
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.3 0.0 6.5 6.5 59.7 15.4
LnGrp LOS D A A A E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 87 900 881
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.3 6.5 17.2
Approach LOS D A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.7 76.6 84.3 15.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.5 28.0 41.0 34.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.0 11.7 21.1 7.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.4 6.0 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.4
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 460 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_WE Mid 2: Island Way & Carlsbad Blvd 11/10/2022
WE Mid 8:45 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 0 15 31 0 28 15 772 28 56 24 775 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 0 15 31 0 28 15 772 28 56 24 775 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 0 16 34 0 30 16 839 30 26 842
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 32 0 0 186 0 66 32 2571 92 46 2639
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.73 0.73 0.03 0.74 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 16 1781 0 1585 1781 3500 125 1781 3647 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 60.3 34 0 30 16 426 443 26 842
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 E 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1848 1781 1777 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 1.7 0.0 1.8 0.9 8.4 8.4 1.4 8.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 1.7 0.0 1.8 0.9 8.4 8.4 1.4 8.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 32 186 0 66 32 1306 1358 46 2639 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.18 0.00 0.46 0.50 0.33 0.33 0.57 0.32 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 98 186 0 325 98 1306 1358 240 2639 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 0.76 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.7 40.9 0.0 46.8 48.7 4.6 4.6 48.2 4.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.6 0.5 0.0 4.8 11.6 0.7 0.6 8.1 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.5 2.8 2.9 0.7 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.3 41.3 0.0 51.7 60.3 5.3 5.3 56.3 4.6 LnGrp LOS E D A D E A A E A
Approach Vol, veh/h 64 885 868
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.2 6.3 6.1
Approach LOS D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.1 78.0 14.9 6.3 78.8 6.3 8.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.5 42.5 7.5 5.5 50.5 5.5 20.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.4 10.4 3.7 2.9 10.0 2.9 3.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.1
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 461 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_WE Mid 2: Island Way & Carlsbad Blvd 11/10/2022
WE Mid 8:45 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 3 ends

Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0
Future Volume (veh/h) 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0
Cap, veh/h 0
Arrive On Green 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0
LnGrp LOS A
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
Timer - Assigned Phs
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 462 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_WE Mid 101: Parking Lot & Carlsbad Blvd 11/10/2022
WE Mid 8:45 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 4 ends

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1027 23 23 949 23 23
Future Volume (veh/h) 1027 23 23 949 23 23
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1116 25 25 1032 25 25
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1188 1007 45 1319 169 169
Arrive On Green 0.64 0.64 0.03 0.71 0.20 0.20
Sat Flow, veh/h 1870 1585 1781 1870 824 824
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1116 25 25 1032 51 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1870 1585 1781 1870 1681 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 54.0 0.6 1.4 36.3 2.5 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 54.0 0.6 1.4 36.3 2.5 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.49 0.49
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1188 1007 45 1319 345 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.94 0.02 0.56 0.78 0.15 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1188 1007 89 1365 345 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.5 6.8 48.2 9.7 32.6 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 15.1 0.0 10.6 2.9 0.9 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 25.1 0.2 0.7 13.3 1.1 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.7 6.8 58.8 12.6 33.5 0.0
LnGrp LOS C A E B C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1141 1057 51
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.1 13.7 33.5
Approach LOS C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.0 7.0 68.0 75.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 5.0 63.5 73.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 3.4 56.0 38.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 5.0 11.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.0
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 463 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Summer_WE Mid 102: Carlsbad Blvd & Palomar Airport Road 11/10/2022
WE Mid 8:45 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 5 ends

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 171 292 680 212 362 688
Future Volume (veh/h) 171 292 680 212 362 688
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 186 317 739 230 393 748
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 330 293 1167 363 432 2576
Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.87 0.87 0.24 0.73
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 2761 830 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 186 317 492 477 393 748
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1585 1777 1721 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 9.5 18.5 7.8 7.8 21.4 7.3
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.5 18.5 7.8 7.8 21.4 7.3
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.48 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 330 293 777 753 432 2576
V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 1.08 0.63 0.63 0.91 0.29
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 330 293 777 753 561 2576
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.1 40.8 4.0 4.0 36.8 4.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 75.8 3.6 3.7 15.9 0.3
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.3 13.3 2.3 2.2 11.1 2.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.3 116.6 7.6 7.7 52.7 5.1
LnGrp LOS D F A A D A
Approach Vol, veh/h 503 969 1141
Approach Delay, s/veh 88.0 7.6 21.5
Approach LOS F A C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.8 48.2 77.0 23.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 36.5 72.5 18.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 23.4 9.8 9.3 20.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 7.3 6.3 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.2
HCM 6th LOS C
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 464 of 647

Option 2 2050 Fall Conditions

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 465 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_AM 4: Carlsbad Blvd 11/28/2022
AM 12:32 pm 08/10/2022 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 4 ends

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 883 6 6 353 6 6
Future Volume (veh/h) 883 6 6 353 6 6
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 960 7 7 384 7 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1049 889 117 1049 287 287
Arrive On Green 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.36 0.36
Sat Flow, veh/h 1870 1585 585 1870 788 788
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 960 7 7 384 15 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1870 1585 585 1870 1689 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 55.6 0.2 1.3 13.6 0.7 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 55.6 0.2 56.9 13.6 0.7 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.47 0.47
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1049 889 117 1049 615 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 0.01 0.06 0.37 0.02 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1426 1209 235 1426 615 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.8 11.6 49.5 14.6 24.5 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.6 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 25.4 0.1 0.2 5.7 0.3 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.3 11.6 49.7 14.8 24.5 0.0
LnGrp LOS C B D B C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 967 391 15
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.2 15.4 24.5
Approach LOS C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 48.2 71.8 71.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 91.5 91.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 57.6 58.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.7 2.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.6
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 466 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_AM 102: Carlsbad Blvd & Palomar Airport Road 11/28/2022
AM 12:32 pm 08/10/2022 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 6 ends

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 168 193 166 160 469 420
Future Volume (veh/h) 168 193 166 160 469 420
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 183 210 180 174 510 457
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 272 242 758 676 549 2744
Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.43 0.43 0.31 0.77
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 1870 1585 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 183 210 180 174 510 457
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1585 1777 1585 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 11.6 15.5 7.8 8.5 33.3 4.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.6 15.5 7.8 8.5 33.3 4.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 272 242 758 676 549 2744
V/C Ratio(X) 0.67 0.87 0.24 0.26 0.93 0.17
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 379 337 758 676 868 2744
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.0 49.6 22.0 22.2 40.2 3.6
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.9 15.6 0.7 0.9 11.2 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.4 7.2 3.4 3.3 16.1 1.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.8 65.3 22.7 23.1 51.5 3.7
LnGrp LOS D E C C D A
Approach Vol, veh/h 393 354 967
Approach Delay, s/veh 58.6 22.9 28.9
Approach LOS E C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 41.5 55.7 97.1 22.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 58.5 22.5 85.5 25.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 35.3 10.5 6.0 17.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.7 1.7 3.5 0.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.5
HCM 6th LOS C
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 467 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_AM 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Solamar Dr 11/28/2022
AM 12:32 pm 08/10/2022 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 5 21 37 299 13 6 11 560
Future Volume (veh/h) 5 21 37 299 13 6 11 560
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 0.96 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 23 325 14 12 609
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 18 81 2426 104 26 2755
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.70 0.70 0.01 0.78
Sat Flow, veh/h 272 1250 3557 149 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 29 0 166 173 12 609
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1577 0 1777 1835 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 2.3 2.3 0.5 3.5
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 0.0 2.3 2.3 0.5 3.5
Prop In Lane 0.17 0.79 0.08 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 102 0 1245 1286 26 2755
V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.46 0.22
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 715 0 1245 1286 119 2755
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.4 0.0 3.7 3.7 36.6 2.3
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.2 11.4 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.7
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.9 0.0 3.9 3.9 48.1 2.5
LnGrp LOS C A A A D A
Approach Vol, veh/h 29 339 621
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.9 3.9 3.3
Approach LOS C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.6 58.5 64.1 10.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 19.5 19.0 34.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.5 4.3 5.5 3.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.7 3.5 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 4.5
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 468 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_AM 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Island Way 11/28/2022
AM 12:32 pm 08/10/2022 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 0 15 11 0 11 15 281 9 48 17 521 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 0 15 11 0 11 15 281 9 48 17 521 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 0 16 12 0 12 16 305 10 18 566
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 34 0 0 206 0 43 34 2301 75 38 2336
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.66 0.66 0.02 0.66 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 16 1781 0 1585 1781 3512 115 1781 3647 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 41.0 12 0 12 16 154 161 18 566
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 D 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1850 1781 1777 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.6 2.1 2.1 0.6 4.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.6 2.1 2.1 0.6 4.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 34 206 0 43 34 1165 1212 38 2336 V/C Ratio(X) 0.47 0.06 0.00 0.28 0.47 0.13 0.13 0.47 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 137 206 0 439 137 1165 1212 151 2336 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.68 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.5 25.6 0.0 31.0 31.5 4.2 4.2 31.4 4.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.5 0.1 0.0 3.5 9.5 0.2 0.2 6.1 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.3 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.0 25.7 0.0 34.5 41.0 4.5 4.5 37.5 4.7 LnGrp LOS D C A C D A A D A
Approach Vol, veh/h 24 331 584
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.1 6.2 5.7
Approach LOS C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.9 47.1 12.0 5.8 47.2 5.8 6.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 18.5 5.0 5.0 19.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 4.1 2.4 2.6 6.2 2.6 2.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.1
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 469 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_AM 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Island Way 11/28/2022
AM 12:32 pm 08/10/2022 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 3 ends

Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0
Future Volume (veh/h) 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0
Cap, veh/h 0
Arrive On Green 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0
LnGrp LOS A
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
Timer - Assigned Phs
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 470 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_PM 4: Carlsbad Blvd 11/28/2022
PM 8:22 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 4 ends

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 11 558 11 1076 11 11
Future Volume (veh/h) 11 558 11 1076 11 11
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 607 12 1170 12 12
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1253 1062 996 1253 206 206
Arrive On Green 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.26 0.26
Sat Flow, veh/h 1870 1585 1402 1870 809 809
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 607 12 1170 25 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1870 1585 1402 1870 1684 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 24.6 0.3 66.2 1.3 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 24.6 0.6 66.2 1.3 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.48 0.48
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1253 1062 996 1253 430 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.57 0.01 0.93 0.06 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1442 1222 1138 1442 430 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.6 10.6 6.7 17.5 33.8 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.5 0.0 10.6 0.3 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 8.1 0.1 29.1 0.6 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.6 11.1 6.7 28.0 34.0 0.0
LnGrp LOS A B A C C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 619 1182 25
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.0 27.8 34.0
Approach LOS B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 35.1 84.9 84.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 92.5 92.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 26.6 68.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.6 12.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.2
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 471 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_PM 102: Carlsbad Blvd & Palomar Airport Road 11/28/2022
PM 8:22 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 6 ends

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 153 358 750 244 238 331
Future Volume (veh/h) 153 358 750 244 238 331
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 166 389 815 265 259 360
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 411 366 1300 423 291 2467
Arrive On Green 0.23 0.23 0.66 0.66 0.16 0.69
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 2730 857 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 166 389 549 531 259 360
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1585 1777 1716 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 9.5 27.7 21.7 21.7 17.1 4.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.5 27.7 21.7 21.7 17.1 4.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 411 366 876 847 291 2467
V/C Ratio(X) 0.40 1.06 0.63 0.63 0.89 0.15
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 411 366 876 847 429 2467
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.1 46.1 14.2 14.2 49.1 6.2
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 64.8 3.1 3.2 14.6 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.2 17.4 7.9 7.6 8.8 1.5
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.8 110.9 17.3 17.4 63.7 6.4
LnGrp LOS D F B B E A
Approach Vol, veh/h 555 1080 619
Approach Delay, s/veh 89.6 17.3 30.4
Approach LOS F B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.1 63.7 87.8 32.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.9 49.9 83.3 27.7
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 19.1 23.7 6.1 29.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 8.4 2.7 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.7
HCM 6th LOS D
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 472 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_PM 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Solamar Dr 11/28/2022
PM 8:22 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 24 41 959 11 10 11 430
Future Volume (veh/h) 10 24 41 959 11 10 11 430
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 0.96 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 11 26 1042 12 12 467
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 29 68 2829 33 24 2977
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.28
Sat Flow, veh/h 463 1094 3690 41 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 38 0 515 539 12 467
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1599 0 1777 1861 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.0 10.4 10.4 0.8 11.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 0.0 10.4 10.4 0.8 11.9
Prop In Lane 0.29 0.68 0.02 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 99 0 1398 1464 24 2977
V/C Ratio(X) 0.38 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.49 0.16
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 453 0 1398 1464 393 2977
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.93 0.93 0.96 0.96
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.1 0.0 3.8 3.8 59.3 11.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.4 0.0 0.7 0.7 13.8 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 0.0 3.3 3.5 0.5 5.7
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.5 0.0 4.5 4.5 73.2 11.5
LnGrp LOS E A A A E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 38 1054 479
Approach Delay, s/veh 56.5 4.5 13.0
Approach LOS E A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.1 100.4 106.5 13.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.5 43.0 61.0 34.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.8 12.4 13.9 4.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 8.2 3.5 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.4
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 473 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_PM 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Island Way 11/28/2022
PM 8:22 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 0 15 30 0 13 15 945 24 36 15 414 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 0 15 30 0 13 15 945 24 36 15 414 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 0 16 33 0 14 16 1027 26 16 450
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 31 0 0 156 0 52 31 2771 70 31 2781
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.03 0.03 1.00 1.00 0.02 0.78 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 16 1781 0 1585 1781 3541 90 1781 3647 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 71.5 33 0 14 16 515 538 16 450
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 E 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1854 1781 1777 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 2.1 0.0 1.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 3.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 2.1 0.0 1.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 3.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 31 156 0 52 31 1391 1451 31 2781 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.21 0.00 0.27 0.52 0.37 0.37 0.52 0.16 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 111 156 0 271 111 1391 1451 186 2781 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 58.5 50.9 0.0 56.6 57.4 0.0 0.0 58.5 3.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.0 0.7 0.0 2.7 12.5 0.7 0.7 12.4 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 71.5 51.5 0.0 59.3 70.0 0.7 0.7 70.9 3.4 LnGrp LOS E D A E E A A E A
Approach Vol, veh/h 47 1069 466
Approach Delay, s/veh 53.9 1.8 5.7
Approach LOS D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.6 98.4 15.0 6.6 98.4 6.6 8.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.5 61.5 9.5 7.5 66.5 7.5 20.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 2.0 4.1 3.1 5.8 3.1 3.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.1
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 474 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_PM 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Island Way 11/28/2022
PM 8:22 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 3 ends

Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0
Future Volume (veh/h) 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0
Cap, veh/h 0
Arrive On Green 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0
LnGrp LOS A
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
Timer - Assigned Phs
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 475 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_WE Mid 4: Carlsbad Blvd 11/28/2022
WE Mid 8:45 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 4 ends

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 818 23 23 570 23 23
Future Volume (veh/h) 818 23 23 570 23 23
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 889 25 25 620 25 25
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1169 991 45 1300 177 177
Arrive On Green 0.63 0.63 0.03 0.70 0.21 0.21
Sat Flow, veh/h 1870 1585 1781 1870 824 824
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 889 25 25 620 51 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1870 1585 1781 1870 1681 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 34.0 0.6 1.4 15.1 2.5 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 34.0 0.6 1.4 15.1 2.5 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.49 0.49
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1169 991 45 1300 361 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.03 0.56 0.48 0.14 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1169 991 98 1356 361 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.4 7.1 48.2 7.0 31.8 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.7 0.0 10.6 0.3 0.8 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 14.3 0.2 0.7 5.3 1.1 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 18.1 7.2 58.8 7.2 32.6 0.0
LnGrp LOS B A E A C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 914 645 51
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.8 9.2 32.6
Approach LOS B A C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.0 7.0 67.0 74.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 5.5 62.5 72.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 3.4 36.0 17.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 7.9 5.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.8
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 476 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_WE Mid 102: Carlsbad Blvd & Palomar Airport Road 11/28/2022
WE Mid 8:45 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 6 ends

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 177 200 393 204 310 530
Future Volume (veh/h) 177 200 393 204 310 530
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 192 217 427 222 337 576
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 286 255 1116 575 378 2663
Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.33 0.33 0.21 0.75
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 2362 1168 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 192 217 333 316 337 576
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1585 1777 1660 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 10.1 13.3 14.4 14.6 18.4 4.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.1 13.3 14.4 14.6 18.4 4.8
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.70 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 286 255 874 817 378 2663
V/C Ratio(X) 0.67 0.85 0.38 0.39 0.89 0.22
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 383 341 874 817 597 2663
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.5 40.8 21.8 21.9 38.3 3.7
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 14.5 1.2 1.4 10.2 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.6 6.2 6.7 6.3 9.0 1.5
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.2 55.3 23.1 23.3 48.5 3.9
LnGrp LOS D E C C D A
Approach Vol, veh/h 409 649 913
Approach Delay, s/veh 49.2 23.2 20.4
Approach LOS D C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.7 53.7 79.4 20.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 33.5 31.5 69.5 21.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.4 16.6 6.8 15.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 3.6 4.6 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.3
HCM 6th LOS C
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 477 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_WE Mid 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Solamar Dr 11/28/2022
WE Mid 8:45 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 7 16 26 534 11 5 23 670
Future Volume (veh/h) 7 16 26 534 11 5 23 670
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 0.96 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 8 17 580 12 25 728
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 29 62 2669 55 45 2916
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.75 0.75 0.01 0.27
Sat Flow, veh/h 494 1049 3650 74 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 26 0 290 302 25 728
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1605 0 1777 1853 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 0.0 4.9 4.9 1.4 16.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 0.0 4.9 4.9 1.4 16.0
Prop In Lane 0.31 0.65 0.04 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 95 0 1334 1391 45 2916
V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.56 0.25
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 546 0 1334 1391 454 2916
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.95
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.0 0.0 3.7 3.7 49.0 12.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.5 0.0 0.4 0.4 10.1 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 0.0 1.5 1.6 0.7 7.6
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.5 0.0 4.1 4.1 59.1 12.6
LnGrp LOS D A A A E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 26 592 753
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.5 4.1 14.1
Approach LOS D A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.0 81.1 88.1 11.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.5 24.0 43.0 34.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.4 6.9 18.0 3.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.3 5.4 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.4
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 478 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_WE Mid 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Island Way 11/28/2022
WE Mid 8:45 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 0 15 15 0 15 15 501 17 51 20 637 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 0 15 15 0 15 15 501 17 51 20 637 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 0 16 16 0 16 16 545 18 22 692
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 32 0 0 165 0 47 32 2632 87 41 2682
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.75 0.75 0.02 0.75 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 16 1781 0 1585 1781 3511 116 1781 3647 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 60.3 16 0 16 16 276 287 22 692
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 E 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1850 1781 1777 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 0.8 0.0 1.0 0.9 4.6 4.6 1.2 5.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 0.8 0.0 1.0 0.9 4.6 4.6 1.2 5.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 32 165 0 47 32 1332 1387 41 2682 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.10 0.00 0.34 0.50 0.21 0.21 0.54 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 151 165 0 293 151 1332 1387 294 2682 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.77 0.77 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.7 41.6 0.0 47.6 48.7 3.7 3.7 48.3 3.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.6 0.3 0.0 4.3 11.5 0.3 0.3 8.3 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.5 1.5 1.5 0.6 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.3 41.8 0.0 51.9 60.2 4.1 4.0 56.6 3.9 LnGrp LOS E D A D E A A E A
Approach Vol, veh/h 32 579 714
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.8 5.6 5.5
Approach LOS D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.8 79.5 13.7 6.3 80.0 6.3 7.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.5 38.5 8.5 8.5 46.5 8.5 18.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 6.6 2.8 2.9 7.9 2.9 3.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.2
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 479 of 647
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Alt 1_Future Non-Summer_WE Mid 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Island Way 11/28/2022
WE Mid 8:45 am 11/10/2022 Synchro 11 Report

Page 3 ends

Movement SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0
Future Volume (veh/h) 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0
Cap, veh/h 0
Arrive On Green 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0
LnGrp LOS A
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
Timer - Assigned Phs
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 480 of 647
South Carlsbad Boulevard Coastal Project- Transportation Assessment 6 ExEcutiv E Summary
Appendix F
Option 2 HCM Worksheets
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 481 of 647

Option 2 Summer Conditions

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 482 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 101 [Carlsbad Blvd / T
urnaround (Site Folder:

AM)]
Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 3:23:37 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 483 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 101 [Carlsbad Blvd / T
urnaround (Site Folder:

AM)]
Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3 L2
6 2.0
6 2.0

0.239

3.7 LOS
A

1.6 41.8

0.06 0.01

0.06 31.8
8 T1
436

2.0 436

2.0 0.239

3.7 LOS
A

1.6 41.8

0.06 0.01

0.06 31.8
Approach
442

2.0 442

2.0 0.239

3.7 LOS
A

1.6 41.8

0.06 0.01

0.06 31.8
North: Carlsbad Blvd
4 T1
714

2.0 714

2.0 0.381

5.0 LOS
A

2.5 64.1

0.06 0.01

0.06 34.2
14 R2
6 2.0
6 2.0

0.381

5.0 LOS
A

2.5 64.1

0.06 0.01

0.06 33.5
Approach
720

2.0 720

2.0 0.381

5.0 LOS
A

2.5 64.1

0.06 0.01

0.06 34.2
W
est:

T
urnaround
5 L2
6 2.0
6 2.0

0.019

5.8 LOS
A

0.1 1.8

0.59 0.48

0.59 32.6
12 R2
6 2.0
6 2.0

0.019

5.8 LOS
A

0.1 1.8

0.59 0.48

0.59 32.0
Approach
12 2.0
12 2.0

0.019

5.8 LOS
A

0.1 1.8

0.59 0.48

0.59 32.3
All V
ehicles
1 174

2.0 1
174

2.0 0.381

4.5 LOS
A

2.5 64.1

0.06 0.01

0.06 33.3
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 3:23:43 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 484 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

AM)]
Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 485 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

AM)]
Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
8 T1
216

2.0 216

2.0 0.422

9.2 LOS
A

2.5 63.4

0.67 0.60

0.67 29.8
18 R2
153

2.0 153

2.0 0.422

9.2 LOS
A

2.5 63.4

0.67 0.60

0.67 29.1
Approach
369

2.0 369

2.0 0.422

9.2 LOS
A

2.5 63.4

0.67 0.60

0.67 29.5
East: Palomar
Airport Road
1 L2
151

2.0 151

2.0 0.348

6.9 LOS
A

2.2 55.2

0.52 0.37

0.52 32.7
16 R2
225

2.0 225

2.0 0.348

6.9 LOS
A

2.2 55.2

0.52 0.37

0.52 31.9
Approach
376

2.0 376

2.0 0.348

6.9 LOS
A

2.2 55.2

0.52 0.37

0.52 32.2
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7 L2
368

2.0 368

2.0 0.560

9.1 LOS
A

4.8 122.3

0.56 0.35

0.56 31.5
4 T1
352

2.0 352

2.0 0.560

9.1 LOS
A

4.8 122.3

0.56 0.35

0.56 31.5
Approach
720

2.0 720

2.0 0.560

9.1 LOS
A

4.8 122.3

0.56 0.35

0.56 31.5
All V
ehicles
1465

2.0 1465

2.0 0.560

8.6 LOS
A

4.8 122.3

0.58 0.42

0.58 31.1
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 3:23:43 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 486 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 1 [Carlsbad Blvd / Solomar Drive (Site Folder:

AM)]
Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 3:23:38 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 487 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 1 [Carlsbad Blvd / Solomar Drive (Site Folder:

AM)]
Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3u
U
32 2.0
32 2.0

0.249

4.4 LOS
A

1.4 35.5

0.18 0.06

0.18 33.2
8 T1
316

2.0 316

2.0 0.249

4.4 LOS
A

1.4 35.5

0.18 0.06

0.18 31.4
18 R2
29 2.0
29 2.0

0.249

4.4 LOS
A

1.4 35.5

0.18 0.06

0.18 30.7
Approach
377

2.0 377

2.0 0.249

4.4 LOS
A

1.4 35.5

0.18 0.06

0.18 31.5
East: Solomar Drive
1 L2
8 2.0
8 2.0

0.060

4.4 LOS
A

0.3 6.4

0.46 0.34

0.46 34.1
16 R2
47 2.0
47 2.0

0.060

4.4 LOS
A

0.3 6.4

0.46 0.34

0.46 33.4
Approach
55 2.0
55 2.0

0.060

4.4 LOS
A

0.3 6.4

0.46 0.34

0.46 33.5
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7u
U
6 2.0
6 2.0

0.273

4.5 LOS
A

1.6 39.9

0.17 0.06

0.17 34.7
7 L2
40 2.0
40 2.0

0.273

4.5 LOS
A

1.6 39.9

0.17 0.06

0.17 34.1
4 T1
379

2.0 379

2.0 0.273

4.5 LOS
A

1.6 39.9

0.17 0.06

0.17 34.2
Approach
425

2.0 425

2.0 0.273

4.5 LOS
A

1.6 39.9

0.17 0.06

0.17 34.2
All V
ehicles
857

2.0 857

2.0 0.273

4.5 LOS
A

1.6 39.9

0.19 0.08

0.19 32.9
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 3:23:44 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 488 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 2 [Carlsbad Blvd / Island W
ay (Site Folder:

AM)]
Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 3:23:39 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 489 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 2 [Carlsbad Blvd / Island W
ay (Site Folder:

AM)]
Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
8 T1
325

2.0 325

2.0 0.236

4.5 LOS
A

1.3 32.2

0.21 0.09

0.21 31.5
18 R2
13 2.0
13 2.0

0.236

4.5 LOS
A

1.3 32.2

0.21 0.09

0.21 30.7
Approach
338

2.0 338

2.0 0.236

4.5 LOS
A

1.3 32.2

0.21 0.09

0.21 31.5
East: Island W
ay
1 L2
17 2.0
17 2.0

0.041

4.4 LOS
A

0.2 4.3

0.47 0.34

0.47 33.4
16 R2
20 2.0
20 2.0

0.041

4.4 LOS
A

0.2 4.3

0.47 0.34

0.47 32.8
Approach
37 2.0
37 2.0

0.041

4.4 LOS
A

0.2 4.3

0.47 0.34

0.47 33.1
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7u
U
39 2.0
39 2.0

0.238

4.0 LOS
A

1.5 38.6

0.1 1

0.02 0.1
1 34.8
7 L2
10 2.0
10 2.0

0.238

4.0 LOS
A

1.5 38.6

0.1 1

0.02 0.1
1 34.3
4 T1
356

2.0 356

2.0 0.238

4.0 LOS
A

1.5 38.6

0.1 1

0.02 0.1
1 34.4
Approach
405

2.0 405

2.0 0.238

4.0 LOS
A

1.5 38.6

0.1 1

0.02 0.1
1 34.4
W
est: RoadName
5 L2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.035

4.4 LOS
A

0.1 3.5

0.49 0.35

0.49 33.3
12 R2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.035

4.4 LOS
A

0.1 3.5

0.49 0.35

0.49 32.6
Approach
30 2.0
30 2.0

0.035

4.4 LOS
A

0.1 3.5

0.49 0.35

0.49 33.0
All V
ehicles
810

2.0 810

2.0 0.238

4.2 LOS
A

1.5 38.6

0.18 0.08

0.18 33.0
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 3:23:43 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 490 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 101 [Carlsbad Blvd / T
urnaround (Site Folder: PM)]
Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 3:27:06 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 491 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 101 [Carlsbad Blvd / T
urnaround (Site Folder: PM)]
Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3 L2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.480

6.1 LOS
A

4.7 1

19.9 0.12

0.02 0.12

30.8 8
T1
879

2.0 879

2.0 0.480

6.1 LOS
A

4.7 1

19.9 0.12

0.02 0.12

30.8 Approach
890

2.0 890

2.0 0.480

6.1 LOS
A

4.7 1

19.9 0.12

0.02 0.12

30.8 North: Carlsbad Blvd
4 T1
684

2.0 684

2.0 0.377

5.0 LOS
A

2.6 64.9

0.08 0.02

0.08 34.2
14 R2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.377

5.0 LOS
A

2.6 64.9

0.08 0.02

0.08 33.4
Approach
695

2.0 695

2.0 0.377

5.0 LOS
A

2.6 64.9

0.08 0.02

0.08 34.2
W
est:

T
urnaround
5 L2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.034

5.8 LOS
A

0.1 3.3

0.59 0.50

0.59 32.6
12 R2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.034

5.8 LOS
A

0.1 3.3

0.59 0.50

0.59 32.0
Approach
22 2.0
22 2.0

0.034

5.8 LOS
A

0.1 3.3

0.59 0.50

0.59 32.3
All V
ehicles
1607

2.0 1607

2.0 0.480

5.6 LOS
A

4.7 1

19.9 0.1
1 0.03

0.1 1

32.2 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 3:27:13 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 492 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

PM)]
Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 493 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

PM)]
Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
8 T1
571

2.0 571

2.0 0.802

19.8 LOS B

19.4 493.3

1.00 1.30

1.87 26.1
18 R2
240

2.0 261

2.0 0.802

19.8 LOS B

19.4 493.3

1.00 1.30

1.87 25.6
Approach
81 1

2.0 832

2.0 0.802

19.8 LOS B

19.4 493.3

1.00 1.30

1.87 26.0
East: Palomar
Airport Road
1 L2
186

2.0 186

2.0 0.814

30.3 LOS C

12.2 309.2

1.00 1.45

2.26 24.4
16 R2
319

2.0 319

2.0 0.814

30.3 LOS C

12.2 309.2

1.00 1.45

2.26 24.0
Approach
505

2.0 505

2.0 0.814

30.3 LOS C

12.2 309.2

1.00 1.45

2.26 24.2
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7 L2
291

2.0 291

2.0 0.590

10.3 LOS B

5.5 139.2

0.69 0.48

0.69 31.1
4 T1
405

2.0 405

2.0 0.590

10.3 LOS B

5.5 139.2

0.69 0.48

0.69 31.2
Approach
696

2.0 696

2.0 0.590

10.3 LOS B

5.5 139.2

0.69 0.48

0.69 31.2
All V
ehicles
2012

2.0 2033

2.0 0.814

19.2 LOS B

19.4 493.3

0.89 1.06

1.56 27.0
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

T
uesday
, November 29, 20
22 8:08:10
AM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 494 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 1 [`Carlsbad Blvd / Solomar Drive (Site Folder: PM)] Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 3:27:07 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 495 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 1 [`Carlsbad Blvd / Solomar Drive (Site Folder: PM)] Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3u
U
31 2.0
31 2.0

0.485

6.6 LOS
A

3.9 100.3

0.20 0.07

0.20 32.3
8 T1
773

2.0 773

2.0 0.485

6.6 LOS
A

3.9 100.3

0.20 0.07

0.20 30.5
18 R2
14 2.0
14 2.0

0.485

6.6 LOS
A

3.9 100.3

0.20 0.07

0.20 29.9
Approach
818

2.0 818

2.0 0.485

6.6 LOS
A

3.9 100.3

0.20 0.07

0.20 30.6
East: Solomar Drive
1 L2
10 2.0
10 2.0

0.075

7.5 LOS
A

0.3 7.4

0.65 0.64

0.65 32.3
16 R2
31 2.0
31 2.0

0.075

7.5 LOS
A

0.3 7.4

0.65 0.64

0.65 31.7
Approach
41 2.0
41 2.0

0.075

7.5 LOS
A

0.3 7.4

0.65 0.64

0.65 31.9
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7u
U
8 2.0
8 2.0

0.366

5.4 LOS
A

2.4 61.3

0.19 0.07

0.19 34.3
7 L2
25 2.0
25 2.0

0.366

5.4 LOS
A

2.4 61.3

0.19 0.07

0.19 33.8
4 T1
552

2.0 552

2.0 0.366

5.4 LOS
A

2.4 61.3

0.19 0.07

0.19 33.9
Approach
585

2.0 585

2.0 0.366

5.4 LOS
A

2.4 61.3

0.19 0.07

0.19 33.9
All V
ehicles
1444

2.0 1444

2.0 0.485

6.1 LOS
A

3.9 100.3

0.21 0.08

0.21 31.9
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 3:27:14 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 496 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 2 [Carlsbad Blvd / Island W
ay (Site Folder: PM)]
Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 3:27:09 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 497 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 2 [Carlsbad Blvd / Island W
ay (Site Folder: PM)]
Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
8 T1
765

2.0 765

2.0 0.538

8.0 LOS
A

4.4 1
1 1.4

0.37 0.19

0.37 30.0
18 R2
28 2.0
28 2.0

0.538

8.0 LOS
A

4.4 1
1 1.4

0.37 0.19

0.37 29.3
Approach
793

2.0 793

2.0 0.538

8.0 LOS
A

4.4 1
1 1.4

0.37 0.19

0.37 30.0
East: Island W
ay
1 L2
20 2.0
20 2.0

0.065

7.9 LOS
A

0.3 6.5

0.67 0.65

0.67 31.4
16 R2
13 2.0
13 2.0

0.065

7.9 LOS
A

0.3 6.5

0.67 0.65

0.67 30.9
Approach
33 2.0
33 2.0

0.065

7.9 LOS
A

0.3 6.5

0.67 0.65

0.67 31.2
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7u
U
52 2.0
52 2.0

0.332

4.8 LOS
A

2.6 65.8

0.14 0.04

0.14 34.4
7 L2
20 2.0
20 2.0

0.332

4.8 LOS
A

2.6 65.8

0.14 0.04

0.14 33.8
4 T1
499

2.0 499

2.0 0.332

4.8 LOS
A

2.6 65.8

0.14 0.04

0.14 34.0
Approach
571

2.0 571

2.0 0.332

4.8 LOS
A

2.6 65.8

0.14 0.04

0.14 34.0
W
est: RoadName
5 L2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.042

5.5 LOS
A

0.2 4.2

0.57 0.47

0.57 32.8
12 R2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.042

5.5 LOS
A

0.2 4.2

0.57 0.47

0.57 32.2
Approach
30 2.0
30 2.0

0.042

5.5 LOS
A

0.2 4.2

0.57 0.47

0.57 32.5
All V
ehicles
1427

2.0 1427

2.0 0.538

6.6 LOS
A

4.4 1
1 1.4

0.29 0.14

0.29 31.6
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 3:27:14 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 498 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 101 [Carlsbad Blvd / T
urnaround (Site Folder: Midday)]
Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 4:35:57 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 499 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 101 [Carlsbad Blvd / T
urnaround (Site Folder: Midday)]
Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3 L2
23 2.0
23 2.0

0.552

7.3 LOS
A

6.3 159.6

0.22 0.06

0.22 30.3
8 T1
949

2.0 949

2.0 0.552

7.3 LOS
A

6.3 159.6

0.22 0.06

0.22 30.3
Approach
972

2.0 972

2.0 0.552

7.3 LOS
A

6.3 159.6

0.22 0.06

0.22 30.3
North: Carlsbad Blvd
4 T1
1027

2.0 1027

2.0 0.586

7.7 LOS
A

6.1 154.7

0.20 0.06

0.20 32.9
14 R2
23 2.0
23 2.0

0.586

7.7 LOS
A

6.1 154.7

0.20 0.06

0.20 32.1
Approach
1050

2.0 1050

2.0 0.586

7.7 LOS
A

6.1 154.7

0.20 0.06

0.20 32.8
W
est:

T
urnaround
5 L2
23 2.0
23 2.0

0.107

10.0 LOS
A

0.4 10.3

0.71 0.71

0.71 30.8
12 R2
23 2.0
23 2.0

0.107

10.0 LOS
A

0.4 10.3

0.71 0.71

0.71 30.2
Approach
46 2.0
46 2.0

0.107

10.0 LOS
A

0.4 10.3

0.71 0.71

0.71 30.5
All V
ehicles
2068

2.0 2068

2.0 0.586

7.6 LOS
A

6.3 159.6

0.22 0.07

0.22 31.5
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 4:34:44 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 500 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

Midday)]
Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 501 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

Midday)]
Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
8 T1
680

2.0 680

2.0 0.978

45.8 LOS D

40.6 1032.3

1.00 2.12

3.46 20.1
18 R2
212

2.0 212

2.0 0.978

45.8 LOS D

40.6 1032.3

1.00 2.12

3.46 19.8
Approach
892

2.0 892

2.0 0.978

45.8 LOS D

40.6 1032.3

1.00 2.12

3.46 20.0
East: Palomar
Airport Road
1 L2
171

2.0 171

2.0 0.885

43.9 LOS D

14.1 359.1

1.00 1.58

2.75 21.3
16 R2
292

2.0 292

2.0 0.885

43.9 LOS D

14.1 359.1

1.00 1.58

2.75 20.9
Approach
463

2.0 463

2.0 0.885

43.9 LOS D

14.1 359.1

1.00 1.58

2.75 21.1
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7 L2
362

2.0 362

2.0 0.828

18.8 LOS B

25.3 642.9

1.00 0.94

1.46 28.0
4 T1
688

2.0 688

2.0 0.828

18.8 LOS B

25.3 642.9

1.00 0.94

1.46 28.0
Approach
1050

2.0 1050

2.0 0.828

18.8 LOS B

25.3 642.9

1.00 0.94

1.46 28.0
All V
ehicles
2405

2.0 2405

2.0 0.978

33.7 LOS C

40.6 1032.3

1.00 1.50

2.45 23.1
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

T
uesday
, November 29, 20
22 8:10:29
AM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 502 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 1 [Carlsbad Blvd / Solomar Drive (Site Folder: Midday)] Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 4:35:59 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 503 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 1 [Carlsbad Blvd / Solomar Drive (Site Folder: Midday)] Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3u
U
52 2.0
52 2.0

0.536

7.4 LOS
A

4.9 125.6

0.27 0.10

0.27 31.9
8 T1
813

2.0 813

2.0 0.536

7.4 LOS
A

4.9 125.6

0.27 0.10

0.27 30.2
18 R2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.536

7.4 LOS
A

4.9 125.6

0.27 0.10

0.27 29.5
Approach
880

2.0 880

2.0 0.536

7.4 LOS
A

4.9 125.6

0.27 0.10

0.27 30.3
East: Solomar Drive
1 L2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.158

9.4 LOS
A

0.6 16.2

0.70 0.70

0.70 31.7
16 R2
68 2.0
68 2.0

0.158

9.4 LOS
A

0.6 16.2

0.70 0.70

0.70 31.1
Approach
79 2.0
79 2.0

0.158

9.4 LOS
A

0.6 16.2

0.70 0.70

0.70 31.2
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7u
U
10 2.0
10 2.0

0.528

7.5 LOS
A

4.5 1

14.5 0.32

0.14 0.32

33.2 7
L2
33 2.0
33 2.0

0.528

7.5 LOS
A

4.5 1

14.5 0.32

0.14 0.32

32.7 4
T1
777

2.0 777

2.0 0.528

7.5 LOS
A

4.5 1

14.5 0.32

0.14 0.32

32.8 Approach
820

2.0 820

2.0 0.528

7.5 LOS
A

4.5 1

14.5 0.32

0.14 0.32

32.8 All V
ehicles
1779

2.0 1779

2.0 0.536

7.5 LOS
A

4.9 125.6

0.31 0.14

0.31 31.4
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 4:34:45 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 504 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 2 [Carlsbad Blvd / Island W
ay (Site Folder: Midday)]
Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 4:36:00 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 505 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 2 [Carlsbad Blvd / Island W
ay (Site Folder: Midday)]
Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
8 T1
772

2.0 772

2.0 0.553

8.3 LOS
A

4.7 1

19.0 0.41

0.21 0.41

29.9 18
R2
28 2.0
28 2.0

0.553

8.3 LOS
A

4.7 1

19.0 0.41

0.21 0.41

29.2 Approach
800

2.0 800

2.0 0.553

8.3 LOS
A

4.7 1

19.0 0.41

0.21 0.41

29.9 East: Island W
ay
1 L2
31 2.0
31 2.0

0.1 19

8.9 LOS
A

0.5 12.3

0.69 0.69

0.69 31.2
16 R2
28 2.0
28 2.0

0.1 19

8.9 LOS
A

0.5 12.3

0.69 0.69

0.69 30.6
Approach
59 2.0
59 2.0

0.1 19

8.9 LOS
A

0.5 12.3

0.69 0.69

0.69 30.9
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7u
U
56 2.0
56 2.0

0.505

6.8 LOS
A

5.1 129.9

0.24 0.08

0.24 33.5
7 L2
24 2.0
24 2.0

0.505

6.8 LOS
A

5.1 129.9

0.24 0.08

0.24 32.9
4 T1
775

2.0 775

2.0 0.505

6.8 LOS
A

5.1 129.9

0.24 0.08

0.24 33.1
Approach
855

2.0 855

2.0 0.505

6.8 LOS
A

5.1 129.9

0.24 0.08

0.24 33.1
W
est: RoadName
5 L2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.060

8.0 LOS
A

0.2 5.9

0.67 0.66

0.67 31.6
12 R2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.060

8.0 LOS
A

0.2 5.9

0.67 0.66

0.67 31.0
Approach
30 2.0
30 2.0

0.060

8.0 LOS
A

0.2 5.9

0.67 0.66

0.67 31.3
All V
ehicles
1744

2.0 1744

2.0 0.553

7.6 LOS
A

5.1 129.9

0.34 0.17

0.34 31.4
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 4:34:45 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 506 of 647

Option 2 Fall Conditions

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 507 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 101 [Carlsbad Blvd / T
urnaround (Site Folder:

AM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 2:38:07 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 508 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 101 [Carlsbad Blvd / T
urnaround (Site Folder:

AM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3 L2
6 2.0
6 2.0

0.196

3.4 LOS
A

1.3 33.1

0.06 0.01

0.06 31.9
8 T1
353

2.0 353

2.0 0.196

3.4 LOS
A

1.3 33.1

0.06 0.01

0.06 31.9
Approach
359

2.0 359

2.0 0.196

3.4 LOS
A

1.3 33.1

0.06 0.01

0.06 31.9
North: Carlsbad Blvd
4 T1
883

2.0 883

2.0 0.467

5.9 LOS
A

3.6 91.2

0.06 0.01

0.06 33.8
14 R2
6 2.0
6 2.0

0.467

5.9 LOS
A

3.6 91.2

0.06 0.01

0.06 33.0
Approach
889

2.0 889

2.0 0.467

5.9 LOS
A

3.6 91.2

0.06 0.01

0.06 33.8
W
est:

T
urnaround
5 L2
6 2.0
6 2.0

0.023

7.1 LOS
A

0.1 2.1

0.64 0.56

0.64 32.0
12 R2
6 2.0
6 2.0

0.023

7.1 LOS
A

0.1 2.1

0.64 0.56

0.64 31.4
Approach
12 2.0
12 2.0

0.023

7.1 LOS
A

0.1 2.1

0.64 0.56

0.64 31.7
All V
ehicles
1260

2.0 1260

2.0 0.467

5.2 LOS
A

3.6 91.2

0.07 0.02

0.07 33.2
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 2:37:39 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 509 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

AM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 510 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

AM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
8 T1
166

2.0 166

2.0 0.433

10.6 LOS B

2.8 71.1

0.74 0.77

0.85 29.3
18 R2
160

2.0 160

2.0 0.433

10.6 LOS B

2.8 71.1

0.74 0.77

0.85 28.6
Approach
326

2.0 326

2.0 0.433

10.6 LOS B

2.8 71.1

0.74 0.77

0.85 28.9
East: Palomar
Airport Road
1 L2
168

2.0 168

2.0 0.31
1 6.0
LOS
A

2.0 49.9

0.45 0.29

0.45 32.9
16 R2
193

2.0 193

2.0 0.31
1 6.0
LOS
A

2.0 49.9

0.45 0.29

0.45 32.2
Approach
361

2.0 361

2.0 0.31
1 6.0
LOS
A

2.0 49.9

0.45 0.29

0.45 32.5
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7 L2
469

2.0 469

2.0 0.696

12.5 LOS B

7.3 184.3

0.72 0.48

0.72 30.0
4 T1
420

2.0 420

2.0 0.696

12.5 LOS B

7.3 184.3

0.72 0.48

0.72 30.1
Approach
889

2.0 889

2.0 0.696

12.5 LOS B

7.3 184.3

0.72 0.48

0.72 30.1
All V
ehicles
1576

2.0 1576

2.0 0.696

10.6 LOS B

7.3 184.3

0.66 0.50

0.69 30.3
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 2:37:39 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 511 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 1 [Carlsbad Blvd / Solomar Drive (Site Folder:

AM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 2:38:09 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 512 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 1 [Carlsbad Blvd / Solomar Drive (Site Folder:

AM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3u
U
37 2.0
37 2.0

0.207

3.7 LOS
A

1.1 29.0

0.09 0.02

0.09 33.5
8 T1
299

2.0 299

2.0 0.207

3.7 LOS
A

1.1 29.0

0.09 0.02

0.09 31.7
18 R2
13 2.0
13 2.0

0.207

3.7 LOS
A

1.1 29.0

0.09 0.02

0.09 30.9
Approach
349

2.0 349

2.0 0.207

3.7 LOS
A

1.1 29.0

0.09 0.02

0.09 31.8
East: Solomar Drive
1 L2
5 2.0
5 2.0

0.028

4.1 LOS
A

0.1 2.8

0.44 0.29

0.44 34.2
16 R2
21 2.0
21 2.0

0.028

4.1 LOS
A

0.1 2.8

0.44 0.29

0.44 33.5
Approach
26 2.0
26 2.0

0.028

4.1 LOS
A

0.1 2.8

0.44 0.29

0.44 33.6
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7u
U
6 2.0
6 2.0

0.362

5.3 LOS
A

2.3 58.4

0.19 0.07

0.19 34.4
7 L2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.362

5.3 LOS
A

2.3 58.4

0.19 0.07

0.19 33.9
4 T1
560

2.0 560

2.0 0.362

5.3 LOS
A

2.3 58.4

0.19 0.07

0.19 34.0
Approach
577

2.0 577

2.0 0.362

5.3 LOS
A

2.3 58.4

0.19 0.07

0.19 34.0
All V
ehicles
952

2.0 952

2.0 0.362

4.7 LOS
A

2.3 58.4

0.16 0.06

0.16 33.1
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 2:37:40 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 513 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 2 [Carlsbad Blvd / Island W
ay (Site Folder:

AM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 2:38:10 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 514 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 2 [Carlsbad Blvd / Island W
ay (Site Folder:

AM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
8 T1
281

2.0 281

2.0 0.221

4.6 LOS
A

1.1 28.8

0.27 0.14

0.27 31.4
18 R2
9 2.0
9 2.0

0.221

4.6 LOS
A

1.1 28.8

0.27 0.14

0.27 30.7
Approach
290

2.0 290

2.0 0.221

4.6 LOS
A

1.1 28.8

0.27 0.14

0.27 31.4
East: Island W
ay
1 L2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.024

4.0 LOS
A

0.1 2.5

0.45 0.29

0.45 33.5
16 R2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.024

4.0 LOS
A

0.1 2.5

0.45 0.29

0.45 32.8
Approach
22 2.0
22 2.0

0.024

4.0 LOS
A

0.1 2.5

0.45 0.29

0.45 33.1
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7u
U
48 2.0
48 2.0

0.334

4.6 LOS
A

2.4 61.9

0.09 0.02

0.09 34.5
7 L2
37 2.0
37 2.0

0.334

4.6 LOS
A

2.4 61.9

0.09 0.02

0.09 33.9
4 T1
521

2.0 521

2.0 0.334

4.6 LOS
A

2.4 61.9

0.09 0.02

0.09 34.0
Approach
606

2.0 606

2.0 0.334

4.6 LOS
A

2.4 61.9

0.09 0.02

0.09 34.0
W
est: RoadName
5 L2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.042

5.5 LOS
A

0.2 4.2

0.57 0.48

0.57 32.8
12 R2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.042

5.5 LOS
A

0.2 4.2

0.57 0.48

0.57 32.2
Approach
30 2.0
30 2.0

0.042

5.5 LOS
A

0.2 4.2

0.57 0.48

0.57 32.5
All V
ehicles
948

2.0 948

2.0 0.334

4.6 LOS
A

2.4 61.9

0.17 0.07

0.17 33.1
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 2:37:40 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 515 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 101 [Carlsbad Blvd / T
urnaround (Site Folder: PM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 2:39:20 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 516 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 101 [Carlsbad Blvd / T
urnaround (Site Folder: PM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3 L2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.582

7.5 LOS
A

6.9 174.7

0.14 0.03

0.14 30.2
8 T1
1076

2.0 1076

2.0 0.582

7.5 LOS
A

6.9 174.7

0.14 0.03

0.14 30.2
Approach
1087

2.0 1087

2.0 0.582

7.5 LOS
A

6.9 174.7

0.14 0.03

0.14 30.2
North: Carlsbad Blvd
4 T1
558

2.0 558

2.0 0.312

4.4 LOS
A

1.9 49.3

0.08 0.02

0.08 34.5
14 R2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.312

4.4 LOS
A

1.9 49.3

0.08 0.02

0.08 33.7
Approach
569

2.0 569

2.0 0.312

4.4 LOS
A

1.9 49.3

0.08 0.02

0.08 34.5
W
est:

T
urnaround
5 L2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.029

5.1 LOS
A

0.1 2.9

0.54 0.43

0.54 33.0
12 R2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.029

5.1 LOS
A

0.1 2.9

0.54 0.43

0.54 32.3
Approach
22 2.0
22 2.0

0.029

5.1 LOS
A

0.1 2.9

0.54 0.43

0.54 32.6
All V
ehicles
1678

2.0 1678

2.0 0.582

6.4 LOS
A

6.9 174.7

0.13 0.03

0.13 31.6
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 2:37:41 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 517 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

PM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 518 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

PM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
8 T1
750

2.0 750

2.0 0.861

22.9 LOS C

29.7 755.0

1.00 1.37

2.03 25.3
18 R2
244

2.0 244

2.0 0.861

22.9 LOS C

29.7 755.0

1.00 1.37

2.03 24.7
Approach
994

2.0 994

2.0 0.861

22.9 LOS C

29.7 755.0

1.00 1.37

2.03 25.1
East: Palomar
Airport Road
1 L2
153

2.0 153

2.0 1.072

92.6 LOS F

28.4 722.4

1.00 2.23

4.80 14.6
16 R2
338

2.0 338

2.0 1.072

92.6 LOS F

28.4 722.4

1.00 2.23

4.80 14.4
Approach
491

2.0 491

2.0 1.072

92.6 LOS F

28.4 722.4

1.00 2.23

4.80 14.5
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7 L2
238

2.0 238

2.0 0.459

7.6 LOS
A

3.7 95.1

0.52 0.32

0.52 32.3
4 T1
331

2.0 331

2.0 0.459

7.6 LOS
A

3.7 95.1

0.52 0.32

0.52 32.3
Approach
569

2.0 569

2.0 0.459

7.6 LOS
A

3.7 95.1

0.52 0.32

0.52 32.3
All V
ehicles
2054

2.0 2054

2.0 1.072

35.4 LOS E

29.7 755.0

0.87 1.29

2.28 22.6
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 2:37:41 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 519 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 1 [`Carlsbad Blvd / Solomar Drive (Site Folder: PM)] Non-Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 2:39:22 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 520 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 1 [`Carlsbad Blvd / Solomar Drive (Site Folder: PM)] Non-Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3u
U
41 2.0
41 2.0

0.566

7.4 LOS
A

5.5 139.6

0.18 0.05

0.18 31.9
8 T1
959

2.0 959

2.0 0.566

7.4 LOS
A

5.5 139.6

0.18 0.05

0.18 30.2
18 R2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.566

7.4 LOS
A

5.5 139.6

0.18 0.05

0.18 29.5
Approach
101
1 2.0
101
1 2.0

0.566

7.4 LOS
A

5.5 139.6

0.18 0.05

0.18 30.2
East: Solomar Drive
1 L2
10 2.0
10 2.0

0.076

9.2 LOS
A

0.3 7.3

0.69 0.69

0.69 31.5
16 R2
24 2.0
24 2.0

0.076

9.2 LOS
A

0.3 7.3

0.69 0.69

0.69 30.9
Approach
34 2.0
34 2.0

0.076

9.2 LOS
A

0.3 7.3

0.69 0.69

0.69 31.1
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7u
U
10 2.0
10 2.0

0.297

4.9 LOS
A

1.8 44.6

0.20 0.08

0.20 34.6
7 L2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.297

4.9 LOS
A

1.8 44.6

0.20 0.08

0.20 34.0
4 T1
430

2.0 430

2.0 0.297

4.9 LOS
A

1.8 44.6

0.20 0.08

0.20 34.2
Approach
451

2.0 451

2.0 0.297

4.9 LOS
A

1.8 44.6

0.20 0.08

0.20 34.2
All V
ehicles
1496

2.0 1496

2.0 0.566

6.7 LOS
A

5.5 139.6

0.20 0.07

0.20 31.4
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 2:37:42 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 521 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 2 [Carlsbad Blvd / Island W
ay (Site Folder: PM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 2:39:22 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 522 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 2 [Carlsbad Blvd / Island W
ay (Site Folder: PM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
8 T1
945

2.0 945

2.0 0.618

9.0 LOS
A

6.1 154.6

0.38 0.17

0.38 29.6
18 R2
24 2.0
24 2.0

0.618

9.0 LOS
A

6.1 154.6

0.38 0.17

0.38 28.9
Approach
969

2.0 969

2.0 0.618

9.0 LOS
A

6.1 154.6

0.38 0.17

0.38 29.6
East: Island W
ay
1 L2
30 2.0
30 2.0

0.103

10.2 LOS B

0.4 10.3

0.72 0.72

0.72 30.3
16 R2
13 2.0
13 2.0

0.103

10.2 LOS B

0.4 10.3

0.72 0.72

0.72 29.8
Approach
43 2.0
43 2.0

0.103

10.2 LOS B

0.4 10.3

0.72 0.72

0.72 30.2
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7u
U
36 2.0
36 2.0

0.288

4.6 LOS
A

2.1 53.1

0.17 0.05

0.17 34.6
7 L2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.288

4.6 LOS
A

2.1 53.1

0.17 0.05

0.17 34.0
4 T1
414

2.0 414

2.0 0.288

4.6 LOS
A

2.1 53.1

0.17 0.05

0.17 34.1
Approach
465

2.0 465

2.0 0.288

4.6 LOS
A

2.1 53.1

0.17 0.05

0.17 34.2
W
est: RoadName
5 L2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.038

4.9 LOS
A

0.2 3.9

0.53 0.41

0.53 33.0
12 R2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.038

4.9 LOS
A

0.2 3.9

0.53 0.41

0.53 32.4
Approach
30 2.0
30 2.0

0.038

4.9 LOS
A

0.2 3.9

0.53 0.41

0.53 32.7
All V
ehicles
1507

2.0 1507

2.0 0.618

7.6 LOS
A

6.1 154.6

0.33 0.15

0.33 30.9
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 2:37:42 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 523 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 101 [Carlsbad Blvd / T
urnaround (Site Folder: Midday)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 2:58:06 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 524 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 101 [Carlsbad Blvd / T
urnaround (Site Folder: Midday)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3 L2
23 2.0
23 2.0

0.349

5.0 LOS
A

2.7 69.8

0.16 0.04

0.16 31.2
8 T1
570

2.0 570

2.0 0.349

5.0 LOS
A

2.7 69.8

0.16 0.04

0.16 31.2
Approach
593

2.0 593

2.0 0.349

5.0 LOS
A

2.7 69.8

0.16 0.04

0.16 31.2
North: Carlsbad Blvd
4 T1
818

2.0 818

2.0 0.476

6.3 LOS
A

3.9 98.3

0.16 0.04

0.16 33.6
14 R2
23 2.0
23 2.0

0.476

6.3 LOS
A

3.9 98.3

0.16 0.04

0.16 32.8
Approach
841

2.0 841

2.0 0.476

6.3 LOS
A

3.9 98.3

0.16 0.04

0.16 33.6
W
est:

T
urnaround
5 L2
23 2.0
23 2.0

0.083

7.5 LOS
A

0.3 8.2

0.65 0.64

0.65 31.8
12 R2
23 2.0
23 2.0

0.083

7.5 LOS
A

0.3 8.2

0.65 0.64

0.65 31.2
Approach
46 2.0
46 2.0

0.083

7.5 LOS
A

0.3 8.2

0.65 0.64

0.65 31.5
All V
ehicles
1480

2.0 1480

2.0 0.476

5.8 LOS
A

3.9 98.3

0.17 0.06

0.17 32.5
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 2:42:00 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 525 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

Midday)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 526 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

Midday)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
8 T1
393

2.0 393

2.0 0.615

12.5 LOS B

7.2 182.7

0.79 0.83

1.09 28.6
18 R2
204

2.0 204

2.0 0.615

12.5 LOS B

7.2 182.7

0.79 0.83

1.09 27.9
Approach
597

2.0 597

2.0 0.615

12.5 LOS B

7.2 182.7

0.79 0.83

1.09 28.3
East: Palomar
Airport Road
1 L2
177

2.0 177

2.0 0.453

10.2 LOS B

3.1 79.8

0.72 0.70

0.81 31.0
16 R2
200

2.0 200

2.0 0.453

10.2 LOS B

3.1 79.8

0.72 0.70

0.81 30.4
Approach
377

2.0 377

2.0 0.453

10.2 LOS B

3.1 79.8

0.72 0.70

0.81 30.7
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7 L2
310

2.0 310

2.0 0.674

12.0 LOS B

7.1 180.1

0.75 0.51

0.75 30.5
4 T1
530

2.0 530

2.0 0.674

12.0 LOS B

7.1 180.1

0.75 0.51

0.75 30.6
Approach
840

2.0 840

2.0 0.674

12.0 LOS B

7.1 180.1

0.75 0.51

0.75 30.5
All V
ehicles
1814

2.0 1814

2.0 0.674
1 1.8
LOS B

7.2 182.7

0.76 0.65

0.87 29.8
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 2:42:01 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 527 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 1 [Carlsbad Blvd / Solomar Drive (Site Folder: Midday)] Non-Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

SIDRA
INTERSECTION 9.0
|
Copyright © 2000
-2020
Akcelik and
Associates Pty Ltd
|
sidrasolutions.com
Organisation: MICHAEL

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 2:58:13 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 528 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 1 [Carlsbad Blvd / Solomar Drive (Site Folder: Midday)] Non-Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3u
U
26 2.0
26 2.0

0.342

5.0 LOS
A

2.2 56.5

0.15 0.04

0.15 33.0
8 T1
534

2.0 534

2.0 0.342

5.0 LOS
A

2.2 56.5

0.15 0.04

0.15 31.2
18 R2
1 1

2.0 1
1 2.0

0.342

5.0 LOS
A

2.2 56.5

0.15 0.04

0.15 30.5
Approach
571

2.0 571

2.0 0.342

5.0 LOS
A

2.2 56.5

0.15 0.04

0.15 31.3
East: Solomar Drive
1 L2
7 2.0
7 2.0

0.031

5.3 LOS
A

0.1 3.1

0.56 0.44

0.56 33.3
16 R2
16 2.0
16 2.0

0.031

5.3 LOS
A

0.1 3.1

0.56 0.44

0.56 32.7
Approach
23 2.0
23 2.0

0.031

5.3 LOS
A

0.1 3.1

0.56 0.44

0.56 32.9
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7u
U
5 2.0
5 2.0

0.419

5.8 LOS
A

3.0 75.4

0.18 0.06

0.18 34.1
7 L2
23 2.0
23 2.0

0.419

5.8 LOS
A

3.0 75.4

0.18 0.06

0.18 33.6
4 T1
670

2.0 670

2.0 0.419

5.8 LOS
A

3.0 75.4

0.18 0.06

0.18 33.7
Approach
698

2.0 698

2.0 0.419

5.8 LOS
A

3.0 75.4

0.18 0.06

0.18 33.7
All V
ehicles
1292

2.0 1292

2.0 0.419

5.4 LOS
A

3.0 75.4

0.17 0.06

0.17 32.6
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 2:42:01 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 529 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 2 [Carlsbad Blvd / Island W
ay (Site Folder: Midday)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 2:58:13 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 530 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 2 [Carlsbad Blvd / Island W
ay (Site Folder: Midday)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 2
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
8 T1
501

2.0 501

2.0 0.393

6.5 LOS
A

2.5 62.7

0.37 0.21

0.37 30.6
18 R2
17 2.0
17 2.0

0.393

6.5 LOS
A

2.5 62.7

0.37 0.21

0.37 29.9
Approach
518

2.0 518

2.0 0.393

6.5 LOS
A

2.5 62.7

0.37 0.21

0.37 30.6
East: Island W
ay
1 L2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.042

5.6 LOS
A

0.2 4.4

0.58 0.48

0.58 32.7
16 R2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.042

5.6 LOS
A

0.2 4.4

0.58 0.48

0.58 32.1
Approach
30 2.0
30 2.0

0.042

5.6 LOS
A

0.2 4.4

0.58 0.48

0.58 32.4
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7u
U
51 2.0
51 2.0

0.416

5.5 LOS
A

3.6 91.9

0.13 0.03

0.13 34.0
7 L2
60 2.0
60 2.0

0.416

5.5 LOS
A

3.6 91.9

0.13 0.03

0.13 33.4
4 T1
637

2.0 637

2.0 0.416

5.5 LOS
A

3.6 91.9

0.13 0.03

0.13 33.6
Approach
748

2.0 748

2.0 0.416

5.5 LOS
A

3.6 91.9

0.13 0.03

0.13 33.6
W
est: RoadName
5 L2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.050

6.7 LOS
A

0.2 4.9

0.62 0.57

0.62 32.2
12 R2
15 2.0
15 2.0

0.050

6.7 LOS
A

0.2 4.9

0.62 0.57

0.62 31.6
Approach
30 2.0
30 2.0

0.050

6.7 LOS
A

0.2 4.9

0.62 0.57

0.62 31.9
All V
ehicles
1326

2.0 1326

2.0 0.416

5.9 LOS
A

3.6 91.9

0.25 0.12

0.25 32.3
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 2:42:02 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 2
-
Roundabouts\191302_Alt 2_
Non-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 531 of 647
South Carlsbad Boulevard Coastal Project- Transportation Assessment 6 ExEcutiv E Summary
Appendix G
Future Year 2050 HCM Worksheets
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 532 of 647

Option 3 Summer Conditions

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 533 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

AM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 3
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3u
U
42 2.0
42 2.0

0.495

12.0 LOS B

3.8 96.4

0.78 0.87

1.02 30.2
8 T1
166

2.0 166

2.0 0.495

12.0 LOS B

3.8 96.4

0.78 0.87

1.02 28.6
18 R2
160

2.0 160

2.0 0.495

12.0 LOS B

3.8 96.4

0.78 0.87

1.02 27.9
Approach
368

2.0 368

2.0 0.495

12.0 LOS B

3.8 96.4

0.78 0.87

1.02 28.5
East: Palomar
Airport Road
1 L2
168

2.0 168

2.0 0.334

6.7 LOS
A

2.1 53.5

0.52 0.36

0.52 32.6
16 R2
193

2.0 193

2.0 0.334

6.7 LOS
A

2.1 53.5

0.52 0.36

0.52 31.9
Approach
361

2.0 361

2.0 0.334

6.7 LOS
A

2.1 53.5

0.52 0.36

0.52 32.2
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7 L2
469

2.0 469

2.0 0.741

14.7 LOS B

14.3 362.0

0.83 0.80

1.19 29.2
4 T1
420

2.0 420

2.0 0.741

14.7 LOS B

14.3 362.0

0.83 0.80

1.19 29.2
Approach
889

2.0 889

2.0 0.741

14.7 LOS B

14.3 362.0

0.83 0.80

1.19 29.2
All V
ehicles
1618

2.0 1618

2.0 0.741

12.3 LOS B

14.3 362.0

0.75 0.72

1.00 29.6
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

T
uesday
, November 29, 20
22 8:02:33
AM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 3
-
Hybrid @ Solomar\Alt 3_No
n-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 534 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

AM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 3
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created:

T
uesday
, November 29, 2022
8:02:37
AM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 3
-
Hybrid @ Solomar\Alt 3_No
n-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 536 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

PM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 3
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3u
U
51 2.0
51 2.0

0.792

16.1 LOS B

15.5 394.8

0.88 0.68

1.04 28.8
8 T1
750

2.0 750

2.0 0.792

16.1 LOS B

15.5 394.8

0.88 0.68

1.04 27.3
18 R2
244

2.0 244

2.0 0.792

16.1 LOS B

15.5 394.8

0.88 0.68

1.04 26.7
Approach
1045

2.0 1045

2.0 0.792

16.1 LOS B

15.5 394.8

0.88 0.68

1.04 27.2
East: Palomar
Airport Road
1 L2
238

2.0 238

2.0 1.301
177.8
LOS F

55.3 1405.2

1.00 3.19

7.93 9.4
16 R2
331

2.0 331

2.0 1.301
177.8
LOS F

55.3 1405.2

1.00 3.19

7.93 9.3
Approach
569

2.0 569

2.0 1.301
177.8
LOS F

55.3 1405.2

1.00 3.19

7.93 9.4
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7 L2
153

2.0 153

2.0 0.465

8.7 LOS
A

3.3 82.8

0.61 0.46

0.61 32.1
4 T1
338

2.0 338

2.0 0.465

8.7 LOS
A

3.3 82.8

0.61 0.46

0.61 32.1
Approach
491

2.0 491

2.0 0.465

8.7 LOS
A

3.3 82.8

0.61 0.46

0.61 32.1
All V
ehicles
2105

2.0 2105

2.0 1.301

58.1 LOS E

55.3 1405.2

0.85 1.30

2.80 18.4
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

T
uesday
, November 29, 20
22 8:02:34
AM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 3
-
Hybrid @ Solomar\Alt 3_No
n-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 537 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

PM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 3
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created:

T
uesday
, November 29, 2022
8:03:40
AM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 3
-
Hybrid @ Solomar\Alt 3_No
n-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 539 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

Midday)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 3
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3u
U
33 3.0
33 3.0

0.649

13.6 LOS B

8.6 219.1

0.83 0.90

1.21 29.7
8 T1
393

2.0 393

2.0 0.649

13.5 LOS B

8.6 219.1

0.83 0.90

1.21 28.2
18 R2
204

2.0 204

2.0 0.649

13.5 LOS B

8.6 219.1

0.83 0.90

1.21 27.5
Approach
630

2.1 630

2.1 0.649

13.5 LOS B

8.6 219.1

0.83 0.90

1.21 28.0
East: Palomar
Airport Road
1 L2
177

2.0 177

2.0 0.475
1 1.0
LOS B

3.5 89.9

0.76 0.78

0.92 30.7
16 R2
200

2.0 200

2.0 0.475
1 1.0
LOS B

3.5 89.9

0.76 0.78

0.92 30.0
Approach
377

2.0 377

2.0 0.475
1 1.0
LOS B

3.5 89.9

0.76 0.78

0.92 30.3
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7 L2
310

2.0 310

2.0 0.707

13.5 LOS B
1 1.7
296.9

0.81 0.74

1.07 29.9
4 T1
530

2.0 530

2.0 0.707

13.5 LOS B
1 1.7
296.9

0.81 0.74

1.07 29.9
Approach
840

2.0 840

2.0 0.707

13.5 LOS B
1 1.7
296.9

0.81 0.74

1.07 29.9
All V
ehicles
1847

2.0 1847

2.0 0.707

13.0 LOS B
1 1.7
296.9

0.81 0.80

1.09 29.3
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

T
uesday
, November 29, 20
22 8:04:29
AM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 3
-
Hybrid @ Solomar\Alt 3_No
n-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 540 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

Midday)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 3
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created:

T
uesday
, November 29, 2022
8:04:29
AM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 3
-
Hybrid @ Solomar\Alt 3_No
n-Summer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 542 of 647

Option 3 Fall Conditions

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 543 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

AM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 3
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3u
U
40 2.0
40 2.0

0.479

10.4 LOS B

3.5 89.6

0.72 0.70

0.83 30.9
8 T1
216

2.0 216

2.0 0.479

10.4 LOS B

3.5 89.6

0.72 0.70

0.83 29.2
18 R2
153

2.0 153

2.0 0.479

10.4 LOS B

3.5 89.6

0.72 0.70

0.83 28.5
Approach
409

2.0 409

2.0 0.479

10.4 LOS B

3.5 89.6

0.72 0.70

0.83 29.1
East: Palomar
Airport Road
1 L2
225

2.0 225

2.0 0.373

7.6 LOS
A

2.3 59.2

0.58 0.44

0.58 31.9
16 R2
151

2.0 151

2.0 0.373

7.6 LOS
A

2.3 59.2

0.58 0.44

0.58 31.2
Approach
376

2.0 376

2.0 0.373

7.6 LOS
A

2.3 59.2

0.58 0.44

0.58 31.6
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7 L2
368

2.0 368

2.0 0.667

13.1 LOS B

9.5 240.3

0.78 0.80

1.12 29.8
4 T1
352

2.0 352

2.0 0.667

13.1 LOS B

9.5 240.3

0.78 0.80

1.12 29.8
Approach
720

2.0 720

2.0 0.667

13.1 LOS B

9.5 240.3

0.78 0.80

1.12 29.8
All V
ehicles
1505

2.0 1505

2.0 0.667
1 1.0
LOS B

9.5 240.3

0.72 0.68

0.91 30.1
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 5:08:18 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 3
-
Hybrid @ Solomar\Alt 3_Su
mmer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 544 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

AM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday
AM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 3
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 5:08:07 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 3
-
Hybrid @ Solomar\Alt 3_Su
mmer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 546 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

PM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 3
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3u
U
41 2.0
41 2.0

0.823

21.4 LOS C

21.7 552.1

1.00 1.36

1.98 27.0
8 T1
571

2.0 571

2.0 0.823

21.4 LOS C

21.7 552.1

1.00 1.36

1.98 25.7
18 R2
240

2.0 240

2.0 0.823

21.4 LOS C

21.7 552.1

1.00 1.36

1.98 25.1
Approach
852

2.0 852

2.0 0.823

21.4 LOS C

21.7 552.1

1.00 1.36

1.98 25.6
East: Palomar
Airport Road
1 L2
186

2.0 186

2.0 0.869

38.5 LOS D

14.5 368.6

1.00 1.56

2.63 22.4
16 R2
319

2.0 319

2.0 0.869

38.5 LOS D

14.5 368.6

1.00 1.56

2.63 22.1
Approach
505

2.0 505

2.0 0.869

38.5 LOS D

14.5 368.6

1.00 1.56

2.63 22.2
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7 L2
291

2.0 291

2.0 0.625
1 1.6
LOS B

7.0 177.3

0.75 0.62

0.86 30.6
4 T1
405

2.0 405

2.0 0.625
1 1.6
LOS B

7.0 177.3

0.75 0.62

0.86 30.6
Approach
696

2.0 696

2.0 0.625
1 1.6
LOS B

7.0 177.3

0.75 0.62

0.86 30.6
All V
ehicles
2053

2.0 2053

2.0 0.869

22.3 LOS C

21.7 552.1

0.91 1.16

1.76 26.1
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 5:08:57 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 3
-
Hybrid @ Solomar\Alt 3_Su
mmer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 547 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

PM)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekday PM
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 3
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 5:08:55 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 3
-
Hybrid @ Solomar\Alt 3_Su
mmer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 549 of 647

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

Midday)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 3
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Created: M
onday
, November 28, 2022 5:09:21 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 3
-
Hybrid @ Solomar\Alt 3_Su
mmer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 551 of 647

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 102 [Carlsbad Blvd / Palomar
Airport Road (Site Folder:

Midday)]
Non-Summer
-
W
eekend Midday
Site Category: Future 2050
-
Alt 3
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
INPUT

VOLUMES
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
QUEUE
Mov
ID
T
urn
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
fective
Stop
Rate
A
ver
.

No.

Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Carlsbad Blvd
3u
U
63 2.0
63 2.0

1.036

60.6 LOS F

53.4 1357.3

1.00 2.48

4.22 18.4
8 T1
680

2.0 680

2.0 1.036

60.6 LOS F

53.4 1357.3

1.00 2.48

4.22 17.7
18 R2
212

2.0 212

2.0 1.036

60.6 LOS F

53.4 1357.3

1.00 2.48

4.22 17.5
Approach
955

2.0 955

2.0 1.036

60.6 LOS E

53.4 1357.3

1.00 2.48

4.22 17.7
East: Palomar
Airport Road
1 L2
171

2.0 171

2.0 0.952

58.9 LOS E

18.0 457.2

1.00 1.78

3.38 18.6
16 R2
292

2.0 292

2.0 0.952

58.9 LOS E

18.0 457.2

1.00 1.78

3.38 18.4
Approach
463

2.0 463

2.0 0.952

58.9 LOS E

18.0 457.2

1.00 1.78

3.38 18.5
North: Carlsbad Blvd
7 L2
362

2.0 362

2.0 0.900

27.0 LOS C

38.2 971.3

1.00 1.44

2.27 25.4
4 T1
688

2.0 688

2.0 0.900

27.0 LOS C

38.2 971.3

1.00 1.44

2.27 25.5
Approach
1050

2.0 1050

2.0 0.900

27.0 LOS C

38.2 971.3

1.00 1.44

2.27 25.5
All V
ehicles
2468

2.0 2468

2.0 1.036

46.0 LOS D

53.4 1357.3

1.00 1.90

3.23 20.5
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parame ter Settings dialog (Site
tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

V
ehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per mov ement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap
-Acceptance Capacity:

T
raditional M1.

HV (%) values are calculated for
All Movement Classes of
All Heavy V
ehicle Model Designation.

BAKER INTERNA
TIONAL
|
Licence: NETWORK / 1PC
|
Processed:

Monday
, November 28, 202
2 5:08:59 PM
Project:

H:\PDA
T
A\191302 South Carlsbad Blvd
T
A\T
raf
fic\Analysis\Alternatives\Alternative 3
-
Hybrid @ Solomar\Alt 3_Su
mmer
.sip9
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 552 of 647
South Carlsbad Boulevard Coastal Project- Transportation Assessment 6 ExEcutiv E Summary
Appendix H
MMLOS Worksheets
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 553 of 647

Existing Baseline MMLOS

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 554 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 0 0 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? No No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
150' north of La Costa Avenue
1500' north of La Costa Avenue
Coastals
14,899
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 0 | -
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 555 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 0
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
150' north of La Costa Avenue
1500' north of La Costa Avenue
Coastals
14,899
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 556 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum
ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 0 0
* Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? No No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements? No No * Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
1500' north of La Costa Avenue
1500' south of Avenida Encinas
Coastals
14,899
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 0 | -
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 557 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 3.5
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
1500' north of La Costa Avenue
1500' south of Avenida Encinas
Coastals
14,899
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 558 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum
ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 0 0
* Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? No No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements? No No * Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
1500' south of Avenida Encinas
640' south of Avenida Encinas
Coastals
14,899
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 0 | -
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 559 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No
Parallel parking with
door-side buffered bike
lane
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 0
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
1500' south of Avenida Encinas
640' south of Avenida Encinas
Coastals
14,899
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 560 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum
ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 0 0
* Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? No No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements? No No * Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
640' south of Avenida Encinas
Avenida Encinas
Coastals
14,899
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 0 | -
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 561 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 4
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
640' south of Avenida Encinas
Avenida Encinas
Coastals
14,899
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 562 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 0 0 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? No No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Avenida Encinas
850 ' South of Ponto Road
Coastals
11,353
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 0 | -
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 563 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 10
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 4
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Avenida Encinas
850 ' South of Ponto Road
Coastals
11,353
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 564 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 10 0 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' 0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? Yes No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
850 ' South of Ponto Road
Ponto Road
Coastals
11,353
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 565 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 4
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
850 ' South of Ponto Road
Ponto Road
Coastals
11,353
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 566 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 10 0 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) No Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' 0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Ponto Road
200' south of Poinsettia Lane
Coastals
12,995
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 567 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 4
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Ponto Road
200' south of Poinsettia Lane
Coastals
12,995
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 568 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 10 6 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) No Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
200' south of Poinsettia Lane
Poinsettia Lane
Coastals
12,995
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 85 | B
NB SCORE | LOS
85 | B
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 569 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 7
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 6
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
200' south of Poinsettia Lane
Poinsettia Lane
Coastals
12,995
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 570 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 9 0 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes No
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' 0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Poinsettia Lane
Breakwater Road
Coastals
16,361
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 571 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 4
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Poinsettia Lane
Breakwater Road
Coastals
16,361
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 572 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 6 0 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes No
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Breakwater Road
200' north of Breakwater Road
Coastals
12,204
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 85 | B
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 573 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 4
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Breakwater Road
200' north of Breakwater Road
Coastals
12,204
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 574 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 0 0 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? No No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
200' north of Breakwater Road
Island Way
Coastals
12,204
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 0 | -
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 575 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 4
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
200' north of Breakwater Road
Island Way
Coastals
12,204
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 576 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 6 6 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? No No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Island Way
150' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 75 | C
NB SCORE | LOS
75 | C
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 577 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
10 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 4
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Island Way
150' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 578 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 0 0 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? No No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
150' north of Island Way
300' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 0 | -
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 579 of 647
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 580 of 647
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 581 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 4
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
150' north of Island Way
300' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 582 of 647
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 583 of 647
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 584 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 0 0 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? No No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' north of Island Way
800' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 0 | -
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 585 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 2
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' north of Island Way
800' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 586 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 0 0 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? No No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
800' south of Solomar Drive
300' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 0 | -
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 587 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 0
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
800' south of Solomar Drive
300' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 588 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 6 0 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? No No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' south of Solomar Drive
Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 75 | C
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 589 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No Angled parking
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 0
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' south of Solomar Drive
Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 590 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 0 0 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? No No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Solomar Drive
400' north of Solomar Drive
Coastals
11,893
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 0 | -
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 591 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No
Parallel parking with
door-side buffered bike
lane
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
4 0
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Solomar Drive
400' north of Solomar Drive
Coastals
11,893
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 592 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 0 0 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? No No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
400' north of Solomar Drive
Palomar Airport Road
Coastals
11,893
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 0 | -
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 593 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
12 0
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
400' north of Solomar Drive
Palomar Airport Road
Coastals
11,893
100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 594 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 0 0 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? No No
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? No No
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Number of Through Lanes: 2 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: 0' to 2' 0' to 2'
Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? No No
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
No No
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Palomar Airport Road
Manzano Dr
Coastals
15,855
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 0 | -
NB SCORE | LOS
0 | -
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 595 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No Parallel parking
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 10
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
0 0
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Palomar Airport Road
Manzano Dr
Coastals
15,855
100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Existing Baseline MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 596 of 647

Option 1 MMLOS

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 597 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Island Way
150' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 598 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Island Way
150' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 599 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
150' north of Island Way
300' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 600 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
150' north of Island Way
300' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 601 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' north of Island Way
800' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 602 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' north of Island Way
800' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 603 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
800' south of Solomar Drive
300' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 604 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
800' south of Solomar Drive
300' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 605 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' south of Solomar Drive
Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 606 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' south of Solomar Drive
Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 607 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Solomar Drive
400' north of Solomar Drive
Coastals
11,893
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 608 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Solomar Drive
400' north of Solomar Drive
Coastals
11,893
95 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
95 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 609 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Number of Through Lanes: 2 2
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
400' north of Solomar Drive
Palomar Airport Road
Coastals
11,893
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 610 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
400' north of Solomar Drive
Palomar Airport Road
Coastals
11,893
100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 611 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Palomar Airport Road
Manzano Dr
Coastals
15,855
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 612 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? Yes Yes
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Palomar Airport Road
Manzano Dr
Coastals
15,855
100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 1 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 613 of 647

Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 614 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? Yes Yes Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Island Way
150' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 615 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Island Way
150' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
90 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 616 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
No No
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
150' north of Island Way
300' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 617 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
150' north of Island Way
300' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
90 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 618 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
No No
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' north of Island Way
800' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 619 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' north of Island Way
800' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
90 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 620 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
No No
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
800' south of Solomar Drive
300' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 621 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
800' south of Solomar Drive
300' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
90 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 622 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
No No
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' south of Solomar Drive
Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 623 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' south of Solomar Drive
Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
90 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 624 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
No No
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Solomar Drive
400' north of Solomar Drive
Coastals
11,893
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 625 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Solomar Drive
400' north of Solomar Drive
Coastals
11,893
90 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 626 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
No No
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
400' north of Solomar Drive
Palomar Airport Road
Coastals
11,893
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 627 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
400' north of Solomar Drive
Palomar Airport Road
Coastals
11,893
100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 628 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
No No
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Palomar Airport Road
Manzano Dr
Coastals
15,855
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 629 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Palomar Airport Road
Manzano Dr
Coastals
15,855
100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 2 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 630 of 647

Option 3 MMLOS

June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 631 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? Yes Yes Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Island Way
150' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 632 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Island Way
150' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
90 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 633 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
No No
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
150' north of Island Way
300' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 634 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
150' north of Island Way
300' north of Island Way
Coastals
8,633
90 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 635 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
No No
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' north of Island Way
800' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
May require improvements and
upgrades to fully support CAP goals!
X
Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 636 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' north of Island Way
800' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
90 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 637 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
No No
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
800' south of Solomar Drive
300' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 638 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
800' south of Solomar Drive
300' south of Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
90 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 639 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' south of Solomar Drive
Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 640 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
300' south of Solomar Drive
Solomar Drive
Coastals
8,633
90 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 641 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
Yes Yes
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Solomar Drive
400' north of Solomar Drive
Coastals
11,893
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 642 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): higher than 35 mph higher than 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Solomar Drive
400' north of Solomar Drive
Coastals
11,893
90 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
90 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 643 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
No No
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
400' north of Solomar Drive
Palomar Airport Road
Coastals
11,893
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 644 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
400' north of Solomar Drive
Palomar Airport Road
Coastals
11,893
100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 645 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

PEDESTRIAN
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Are crosswalks marked per CA MUTCD standards? Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet
(Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): 8 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g.,
cross-slope and trip hazards)? Yes Yes
* Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA
requirements? Yes Yes
* Do the street light locations appear adequate? Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Number of Through Lanes: 1 1
Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Yes Yes
Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian
facility and vehicle travel way: greater than 5' greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? No No
Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility? Yes Yes
Are there intersection enhancements provided for
pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)?
No No
Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? No No
Is there pedestrian scale lighting? No No
Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? No No
Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? No No
Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more
than 50% of the sidewalk length? No No
Carlsbad Boulevard
Palomar Airport Road
Manzano Dr
Coastals
15,855
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 646 of 647

ROADWAY INFO
Roadway Name
From
To
Street Typology from Mobility Element _
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total)

BICYCLE
Roadway Direction
NB SB
* Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good
(e.g., no pot holes)? Yes Yes
* Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of
obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes
* Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Yes Yes
Is on-street parking provided? No No
Speed limit (miles per hour - mph): 35 mph 35 mph
Does the bikeway on the study segment and side
streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection
provided at intersections? No No
Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? No No
Bicycle Facility Provided: Bike Lane Bike Lane
Lane Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
8 8
Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)
3 3
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Bike lanes are striped
continuously through
the study segment?
Yes Yes
Carlsbad Boulevard
Palomar Airport Road
Manzano Dr
Coastals
15,855
100 | A
NB SCORE | LOS
100 | A
SB SCORE | LOS
X
* Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Option 3 MMLOS
June 20, 2023
Item #15 Page 647 of 647

Preferred Roadway Option for the South
Carlsbad Boulevard Climate Adaptation Study
Tom Frank, Transportation Director/City Engineer
Katie Hentrich, Senior Program Manager
June 20, 2023

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt a resolution accepting the
recommendations of the Traffic and Mobility
Commission and the Beach Preservation
Commission by approving the roundabout option
(Option 2) as the preferred design to complete the
grant requirements for the South Carlsbad
Boulevard Climate Adaptation Study.

ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
22 TODAY’S PRESENTATION
• Overview of study
• Benefits
• Community engagement
• Next steps
ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
3 PROJECT AREA
ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
4 CLIMATE ADAPTATION GOALS
• Funded by State Coastal Conservancy grant
• Maximize roadway’s resiliency to coastal
flooding and cliff erosion
• Supports Sea Level Rise Vulnerability
Assessment + Climate Emergency Resolution
ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
5 SCOPE OF WORK
• Resiliency to coastal flooding, cliff erosion and
other sea level rise impacts
• Cliff erosion assessment
• Las Encinas Creek restoration analysis
• Assess eastward relocation of southbound lanes
of portion of south Carlsbad Blvd.
• Funding expires Feb. 2024
ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
7 • California Complete Streets Act
• General Plan Mobility Element
• Sustainable Mobility Plan
• Engineering Standards
• State of Emergency for Traffic Safety
• Climate Action Plan
• Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment
• Climate Emergency Resolution

CITY OF CARLSBAD POLICIES
8 ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
DIFFERENT STREETS =

DIFFERENT PRIORITIES
Project area
9 COASTAL STREET
Managing speeds Minimizing
crossing distances
Enhancing safety
for bikers
Reducing
greenhouse gas
emissions
10 ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD

WORK TO DATE
General Plan guiding principles
Physical, regulatory, capacity constraints
Las Encinas Creek restoration analysis
Cliff Erosion Assessment Report
Public input
Traffic study
ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
12 CITY OF CARLSBAD PRIORITIES
13 ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD

PROJECT OPTIONS
Option 1: Four lanes with traffic signals
ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
Option 2: Two lanes with roundabouts
Option 3: Two lanes with roundabouts and an
enhanced pedestrian crossing OR a traffic signal
at Solamar Drive
14 Option 1 – Four lanes with traffic signals
15 Option 2 – Two lanes with roundabouts
16 Option 3 – Two lanes with roundabouts
and enhanced pedestrian crossing OR a
traffic signal at Solamar Drive
17 ROUNDABOUT SAFETY

43.7%
Less conflict
points
Reduction in
injuries
67%
90%
Reduction in
fatalities
35%
Reduction in
all crashes
ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
18 130 feet to cross
2 lanes – 32 feet
¼ of the distance
20 20

AVERAGE SECONDS TO GET THROUGH INTERSECTION
(CARLSBAD BLVD. AND PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Summer weekend Summer weekday Fall weekend Fall weekday 88%
Reduction in wait time
22 ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
Solamar Drive(way) Concerns
• Speed
• Noise
• Safe passage of residents and hotel guests
• Entering/exiting vehicles
• Pedestrian crossings
• Improvements vs the bluff erosion
23 ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD

CHANGES BASED ON COMMUNITY INPUT
24 CHANGES BASED ON COMMUNITY INPUT
25 CHANGES BASED ON TRAFFIC STUDY AND INPUT
26 29

OPTIONS ANALYSIS
ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
30 NEXT STEPS
• Finish grant tasks - 30% conceptual design of one project option with climate adaptation incorporated
• Grant does not fund environmental analysis or construction • Grant ends Feb. 2024
• No additional work included in the city’s FY 2022-23 budget • Funding opportunities available
• Coordinate with California Coastal Commission staff on adaptation and retreat options
ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
31 RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt a resolution accepting the
recommendations of the Traffic and Mobility
Commission and the Beach Preservation
Commission by approving the roundabout option
(Option 2) as the preferred design to complete the
grant requirements for the South Carlsbad
Boulevard Climate Adaptation Study.

ITEM 15: SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
32 Backup slides
55

Carlsbad City CouncilJune 20, 2023

Carlsbad City Council
June 20, 2023