2024-02-13; City Council; 04; Approval of Plans, Specifications and Contract Documents and Authorization to Advertise for Bids for the Carlsbad Boulevard Water and Sewer Line Improvements at Terramar — Carlsbad City Council, February 13, 2024 (part 3 of 3)

UTILITIES - PLAN VIEW
SCALE %,6" 1'
N
M
rl
o, •3 I—I o 12" •3 TOP, TYP
& •3 BAR. TYP \,, ~ ~4 80T, TYP .4 BAft~~r.
~ ~ ~ {~_ 5 • ~~- •5, TYP
o \J~~~^'~Y~a ` r, p.~- _ 1Co a f . .
:- ~i~
o
~ ! •• ~ (SEE NOTE)a.,ao c~
3'-6"
E
b
a ~ 0 02 -13-72 AS-BUILT PLANS
a ~ REV DATE
NOTE

EXISTING PIPE AND CONCRETE CASING DIMENSION TO BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR ~ CONCRETE CASING SUPPORT

SCALE NOT TO SCALE
~
~~
~
~ ~
~'
2 I
Y I
U
~
1 ~
~~
I
Z.
;
~,
w I ~ I CANNON ROAD ~ i
~ ~,,
------------ -~~-1- - -- - --
~~ EXISTING CONCRETE
I mo°' ENCASEMENT
EXIST 8" AC SS FORCE MAIN IN 50' OF CONCRETE24" STL CASING (CITY OF CARLSBAD) _ rni i no so'-o°

CONCRETE CASING SUPPORT PER

DELETED
STA 2226 +54 SECTION
SCALE %" ~'
25'-0" MIN.
"~ ^I
~'z~ a~a ~~ Z. 3~~'
50 W I Q I CANNON ROAp o
'E~+~ yip Z i
4s------- - - - - -- 1- ------- - - - - --_?- ---- ~-- - - - - -- ±i
40 I ° I '
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – ' ~ ,35 i

STATION CARRIER PIPE CASING
2226.30 12" AC WATER 20" DIA X 3/e" THK STL
222654 8" AC SEWER CONC CASING PER DETAIL
Informolioq confidential atl
tans, drawings, specifico-
Pions,and/ormtormotion
ueowrvw et C.H. BAO
~l~p
~o pR0~E5SipM1,
~c. .HON B
fvnished herewith shah DRAWN BY
P• ZUCCHI M T R A K ~ ~'~ / ~remain lM~properly of the
Nor lh San Olego County ~~ r ~~Transit DislncC Ontl shat be Ct7ECKED BY M. COLJi N C T D p ♦ /li
No. 54138
held confidential: one shill
not be used for any purpose
not provided for in agree-
menis xilh the Norin Son
APPROVED BY H. SOLP.RTE
~f~~
d 725 TOWN 1 CWNTRY RD
Su~TE 300
* EXP. 12/31/13
Diego County Transit District. DATE
~q~~q~~
m~ ORNICE, CA 92866
~STj~~,~VRP
q
~
DESCRIPTION BY ~~~ qpp FEBRUPRY 13, 2012 ~ CP~~f~
EXIST 12" AC WATER IN 50' Of 20"

STL CASING (CITY OF CARLSBAD)
50'-0"

INSTALLED CONCRETE

ENCASEMENT
STA 2226 *30 SECTION
SCALES ~/8" 1'
NOTES=

1. fOR INSTALLATION PROCEDURES AND DETAILS, SEE DRAWING N0. UD-O7.

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
CONTRACT No.

SAN DIEGO SUBDIVISION, MP 229.3 TO MP 231.8 DRAWING N0.

U D - O2

CARLSBAD DOUBLE TRACK PROJECT
REVISION 0 SHEET N0. 84

SPLIT STEEL CASING EXTENSIONS
SHEET 1 OF S SCALE
qS SHOWN

-- _
.a-.~n K ~. r°n < °o r.°~ a °o
N ti N H H
• M • M V11~ M NN
•
_..... _ JOf~J Q` Q._ ~
45 NOR H FLOW LI n.00 a c~~ -+
W~.~w ,~a~~a~
_- -.7 '0. 6I.
- - - -
~~ _..
'4
40 ORTH FLOWLINE Gt•0.0(
E2~-4.fi
4S STAT90NLINE
N
~
N~OO N
Q~u+Q
O NQO
Qv~o
O N04 N ONmO
W 6.~ W O~ to/~
7Y.
~- L~ U
QJ

F R MEDIAN
4O - ELEVAIONS SEE- -
- EXI TING MAIN TRACK
M TN TRACK.t

CONCETE PANEL
~ ma ^aoN ory o^
45 m
SOUH FLOW UN ~ ~ a~ Q ~~ Q Q_+ Q
w LL w~,~ ~~ao~~~w
olti T • 101

J - - NORTH LOW LINE
_ .~.~ M -_
N1~ rn F¢- ~Q~
U t C N 1~ Q
a0 J> JF-i _..
°~ TOP OF CURB
NM y SOUTH- LOW LINE
Cif O to
U' .- LL ____._... _..__'.. _ .. _..

FOR lEDIAN

ELEVATIO S SEE
WING N0. CP-O5

IRTH FLOW LINE
L~10'
~IQ Cl• 3.65%
- - - - -
_._-.& -
.s'. - - -
4~
_ __ _.
a °o ...___ _ _...
a~'o o° ~
c~•o.00z ~ Q ~ Q ~° •N
C2•-3.65' >o ~ NM ~O J
__
> oa~ LL
• 9 +00
~I \ ''•.

S
M
1 ' i
~
I
\
~ EX MA1N
oa
~
~
! \RO ., MNN TR
N
M
ro
/ i0
i I EC rIZ
A 1.
~ - •' N7999832.29
E6227540.76
~o __
i-
I
- - -- `a
1 ~' --- -
-~ ~ iTV al CARCSBAD Riw - ~- ~ - ' ~_ "
~v - -_'- ---
",-~
y ~ TAMApACK AVENUE 3 N a
C -
o
` `_,
, .,
. _--
o N1999T94 9}~,~ 6 ~
J ~ ^ E6227487 41= ,,, ~,~Z 3 - - --
~ oC 4J O N
a~ o
_ ~
~_ GT~F O~~ARLSBAD R/W I
•-_..~ N-
_ ~x
.... -.

E _ IDHM/
~~ ~ - - ~
-r~.c.

Q -CTt
O.~~OON
~ I NO
~~
~
('
I ~
~.~ W .:_,J -- _...__ •~ ~ '3
ua- j'~ ~ ~
-" 5' 0 5~ 10' lo~ 11
~w - I Z 01
I~o
~
GRAPHIC SCALE V RT.: 1" Y
~ ~~
I
" 20' 10' 0 40' j ~ I I ~
GRAPHIC SCALE HORIZ.~ 1" 20'
°uw
u~
o ~ 0 02 -13 -12 AS-BUILT PLANS

REV DATE DESCRIPTION
nol
~ _.~
'ROFI~~~E~ ~ ~;.~ i ~ ~`.~~ ~ r; r
t .', I ~~ a ~~
h~ N T AG 1 a
i Z I I m °~
' ~~ ~, Z~
i'~ ! Z
1 ~ '~ i ~ v,'.
x i2 a., 4 4,
•, ,...
~ ' p: °w ` ~ - _ .GiY OF CARLSBAD RAW -_ -.. , „ - I-- ~ - -az-- Rip TAMARACK AVENUE R/W
~30' 30'
45 Z' S' 23' 23• 5, 2'
Q ~ ~
t0'18' S 5. 18'
2/ VARIES 2'/. 2% VARIES 2/.40 2% MAX ~-- 2/. MAX
45 PROFILE GRADE) 3

STATION LINE

TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION

TAMARACK AVENUE

SCALE NONE
i~
45 40
REMOVAL NOTES:
~1 REMOVE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT
2~ REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB
~3 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB &GUTTER
~5 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK
~6 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
7~ REMOVE CONCRETE MEDIAN
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
(~ CONSTRUCT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION PER
CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD N0. GS-17.

MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT (AC AND BASE) SECTION, 4" MIN AC Q2 INSTALL S'PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS AND INSTALL 6" HMAC SECTION UNDER TRACK PER NCTD STD 2006 (712')
BETWEEN MT012291.82 AND MT012292.54.(SEE NOTE 41
Q3 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB PER SDRSD G-6, TYPE B-1
4O PROTECT IN PLACE
QS CONSTRUCT CURB &GUTTER PER SDRSD G•6,TYPE B-2,
TRANSITION 0" TO 6" CF PER NCTD STD. 2011 (MODIFIED TO PROVIDE MAX 5% SIDEWALK SLOPE)
Q6 SAWCUT LINE
f-_.
z -
-. __... _. ... .
-- - --- - ---~~
CURVE DATA 7 CONSTRUCT PCC SIDEWALK PER SDRSD G-7 (MODIFIED, 6" THICK PCC) ~ ~'
- -- - ~
6 rAMARA~K
CURVE R Q L T QaCONSTRUCT 7" MIN AC PAVEMENT PER NCTD STD 2006 ~ ~ AVENUE c 1902.81' 3°32'35" 117.67' 58.85' ~0 INSTALL 2'x4'DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE DEVICE PER DETAIL ,~ '_ _ +2D` --- ___ ON APWA STD. 111-3
_y - ~ - -- ~".__ ~ N6J•go~38 E +61~ STA 1+84:68 --
NOTES: n0 CONSTRUCT A.C. RAMP AT END OF CROSSING PANEL
~ i__
~- _N1999899.1 Z - - ---- 1. SIGNAL WORK ON THIS DRAWING IS SHOWN PER NCTD STD 2006. MAX 8~1 SLOPE
- - - - - -- _ _ E6227639 86 FOR INFORMATION ONLY. SIGNAL WORK Q REMOVE AND REPLACE MEDIAN TREATMENT IN KIND ~_
-`-
~ - --
SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE (CONCRETE SHALL BE 520-C-2500) ~ _ __ - -- SIGNAL DRAWINGS._ _ _
---P --~- -r -~-_; ~ _ 1 -CLiY OF.~SB~ ~~ ~ ' - 2 TRANSITION NEW CONSTRUCTION TO JOIN EXISTING 17 ADJUST UTILITY TO GRADE
~ ,..
~II~~IIS
~,,r -- .__
i- - - * FEATURES THROUGH THE FINAL 5 FEET OF CONSTRUCTION. 1 ~~' ~ 3. INSTALL CONDUIT TO FUTURE PEDESTRIAN GATES PER SIGNAL DRAWINGS. 1 g ~' r `~ ~ i J SIGNAL WORK
r ~,:y ~ j ~ ~ ''~ , ; I 4. INSTALL CONDUITS AND 6" PERFORATED PVC UNDERDRNN PER ~' , _ _____s,-_~ -- S ! NCTD STANDARD 2006. CONDUITS TO BE INSTALLED BY THE 15' 10' z L ~-~ i - '~ti ~~ ~ ~> i CIVIL/TRACK CONTRACTOR. UNDERDRAINS SHALL DAYLIGHT TO Oi REMOVE EXISTING WPRNING DEVICES NEAREST DITCHES ALONG THE RNLROAD R/W.

TC X ~" ,^ ,I ~I ~ ~ j. O2 INSTALL NEW WARNING DEVICES
~^ Z ~~.. '~ ~ i ~ ~~._ _ ~ 5. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION SEE DRAWING NOS. UA-Ol THRU UA-06. ~ao~ ~ Q REA10VE EXISTING INSTRUMENT HOUSE
P L AN ~
~~ II ~,!'!, 6. SEE DRAWING N0. CP-OS fOR DETNLS NOT SHOWN. O4 INSTALL NEW INSTRUMENT HOUSE `,_,.~' 7. FOR SIGNING AND STRIPING, SEE DRAWING N0. CS•02. o~,;,~~,;o,o~ DESIGNED BY ,~ NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION I5. 5plCi(iC0" ~ O
Pa~ESS /~
ew~lh sh~aY~ P~ lR~~ ~ `~'~'
roperly o„ „,
DRAWN BY ~~ '~r~A M T R A K ~~Q= ~F, ~ SAN DIEGO SUBDIVISION, MP 229.3 TO MP 231.E ?ass„aloe CHECKED BY ~//~ar+s N c T D m CARLSBAD DOUBLE TRACK PROJECT 1i01~ Ond Sh011 ~M
No. C058094 A
Ior ony purpose PROVED BY PRTTERSON
~ E .06i ~, * TAMARACK AVENUE GRADE CROSSING
for in ogrBe- pM g 775 TOWN 6 COUNTRY RD
ie Norlh San pSSOpgTE~, INC SUiiE 30~ ~ ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD Transit District. .w,+w. ..,.,; ORANGE. CA 92868 q ~~~~ DATE FEBRUAItV 13, 2012 ~~ ~~~f~ CPUC "106- 230.10 /DOT a026822L V~ CP-03
O SHEET N0.
4 O

AS SHOWN

EX MAIN TRACK
(PROP MAIN TRACK 2)
-- --- --
:' ~
.. ~~
-~ ~ EX. TOP Of
_.-- ( CURB _
'~
~`. ...- - - -- -- -_. --,-_ i
~0 +60
~ ~ CANNON ROAD
'~`~ ~~
W ~ !T~ ~
I
fl__-- ~ ,
~W
o~
~~ 0 02 -73-72 AS-BUILT PLANS
a ~ REV DATE

INSTRUME

ISEE NO'

DESCRIPTION
MAIN TRACK rJ
r~
,~. ~ ,
-1- - — ~ ~`
1/ ~. -._~
~! 4 BOLL I D ..
1~•3 65
.A~, fS
Id ~ ~~ '~- -- 1 `
',fit ~ I ~ `l I "~
~ CROSSING DETAIL
CP-04
i._~ j J \)
~ —
t
-- - --
V W Y - - - _ __ ..._... __ -
....,
- -- - - - - -- - __
~'t
1 ----
~,i.
~ -- --- r
1 +i

4.8~F~ 4.L~__~ I L5.61
.4 ~ C (44.96 FS>
i4 ~S (8" CF)

JOIN EX
'~_
__1-- -._.._
TOf~ OF
CU'8
— _.._ - — _._\
'~'"-
.~. - -~--
~ --_:
~~ ...~
-- -- ~- --
_l i'~
Informolion, confidentiol oll DESIGNED 8Y ~~ ~~
pIons, drawings, specifico-
tions, and/or informotion DRAWN BY ~T~p M T R A KIwnished hereeith sholl ~~ reman the~Qroperly of the
Nor lh $an Dieq0 County CHECKED BY ~~~ N C T D
ironsil DislricC anA shall be pM
held conli0entiol~ and shoo
nol be used for any purpose ApPROVE~ BY PNTTERSON
notpr ovided for in ogres- pM a 725 TOWN L COUNTRY RD
menls xith the Norlh Son RSSOCIIITE~, ING SUITE 300
Dieqo County Tronsi~ District. DATE H~ ORANGE, CA 92868 FEBRUMY 13, 2012
REMOVAL NOTES:
~4 REMOVE BOLLARD, FOUNDATION &CHAIN
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:

Q PROTECT IN PLACE
Q CONSTRUCT PCC SIDEWALK PER SDRSD G-7
(MODIFIED 6" PCC TO NCTD R/W, 4" PCC OUTSIDE NCTD R/WI
10 INSTALL 2'x4' DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE DEVICE PER DETAIL ON APWA STD. 111-3
12 REMOVE PND REPLACE MEDIAN TREATMENT IN KIND
(CONCRETE SHALL BE 520•C-2500)
17 ApJUST UTILITY TO GRADE
19 INSTALL BOLLARD AND REMOVABLE CHAIN TO MATCH EXISTING IN KIND QO FUTURE PEDESTRIAN CATE FOUNDATION (NIC), SEE NOTE 3
21 INSTALL AND CAP 2-4" SPARE CONDUITS UNDER TRACKS AND PULL WIRE IN SAME TRENCH AS CONDUIT FOR WARNING DEVICES.

CONDUIT TO TERMINATE AT BACK OF SIDEWALK AND NCTO R/W.

SIGNAL WORK
Ot REMOVE EXISTING WARNING DEVICES
2O WSTALL NEW WPRNING DEVICES

Q REMOVE EXISTING INSTRUMENT HOUSE
Q4 INSTALL NEW INSTRUMENT HOUSE

1. SIGNAL WORK ON THtS DRAWING IS SHOWN
FOR INFORMATION ONLY. SIGNAL WORK

SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
SIGNAL DRAWINGS.

2. TRPNSITION NEW CONSTRUCTION TO JOAN EXISTING
FEATURES THROUGH THE FINAL 5 FEET OF CONSTRUCTION.

3. INSTALL CONDUIT TO FUTURE PEDESTRIAN GATES PER SIGNAL DRAWINGS.

4. INSTALL CONDUITS AND 6" PERFORATED PVC UNDERDRAIN PER NCTD STANDARD 2006. CONDUITS TO BE INSTALLED BY THE
CIVIL/TRACK CONTRACTOR. UNDERDRAINS SHALL DAYLIGHT TO
NEAREST DITCHES ALONG THE RAILROAD R/W.

5. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION SEE DRAWING NOS. UA-01 THRU UA-O6.

6. FOR CURB AND FLOW LINE PROFILES AND OTHER INFORMATION NOT SHOWN, SEE DRAWING N0. CP-Ol.

7. FOR SIGNING AND STRIPING, SEE DRAWING N0. CS-01.

B. CONSTRUCT 6" PCC SIDEWALK WITHIN NCTD R/W.

CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OUTSIDE OF NCTD R/W.

BOLLARD &CHAIN LEGEND
~ REMOVE EXISTING BOLLARD
o EXISTING BOLLARD TO REMAIN
• NEW BOLLARD
- - - EXISTING CHAIN TO BE REMOVED
— -NEW CHaN

CURVE DATA

CURVE R Q L T
OA 100.00' 6° ST02" 11.96' 5.99'
10' S' 0 10' 20'
GRAPHIC SCALE HORIZ. 1" 10'
p,~FESS~ NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
`P~``" """a.``~~ SAN DIEGO SUBDIVISION, MP 229.3 TO MP 231.8 ¢NO. C058094~A A CARLSBAD DOUBLE TRACK PROJECT
!`Qr/c~r ' n
,,,,. .P GRADE CROSSING DETAILS-CANNON ROAD
`"~ CP-04
O SHEET No. 4 1

AS SHOWN

N
0N
U
N
M
M
rn.c
30 vi Y
d
vv0y0
0 SIGNAGE REFERENCES CONSTRUCTION NOTES
O INSTALL 24" SOLID WHITE STOP LINE PER CALTRANS STD DETAIL A24C DO NOT
R R sror 2O INSTALL ROAD SIDE SIGN AND POST ~'}*~
ON
TR^~~ O3 REPAINT EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKING
3fi ~~36" 24'X 0" 4O INSTPLL 4" SOLID WHITE LINE PER CALTRANS DETAIL 27B ~ I QS INSTPLL 4" DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPING PER CALTRANS DETAIL 21 Q REMOVE EXISTING SIGN AND POST ~'
W48 fCA)12) R3-4
~ ~
EXIS(PROPOSE~ MT02K~..
24"X30" 30"X30" O7 INSTALL DETAIL B PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A20A Q8 INSTALL 6" WHITE LINE PER CALTRANS DETAIL 39A
O9 INSTALL 6" WHITE LINE PER CALTRANS DETAIL 39 I I
Ncro a~w ~ iREMOVAL NOTES r~~
Q1 WET SANDBLAST AND REMOVE CONFLICTING STRIPES AND/OR PAVEMENT MARKINGS ~ I i zy --~ ~ ~ 1 ~t ,.., ~ 4 ~ I
~ ~ ~~ v t
\ ~,.:s..,~,.a,.
.a ,~, i
~,,,~ ,~ ~ ritr y ~1
~~i~'"H -•~ CITY OF 91~fj✓>M~ ~;,~ . — - - ~
4 CANNON ROAD I 5
3 ~ R -4 2R3-4
RB -8 Z P.
~ ~ t
~ I '
_ ~
RB-8
Exisr woo-~ — — — — — — — _ ~ 2
rt _ 'NEW W48(CA)121 z ~ — — — — ~ <' —, — — ,~
~'~ - — - - — _ _ _ CITY OF C RD R/W~ — '
,:. - -- ---- - -YV~~ ------ - - - - -~ Q
i ~... ~._
~. ~
" ' -.. ~
i~~w: ~'
. ~
~ w<.`~~ ~ I ~
u~~~i ~~~uu~~i ~v~~~~aen~~m un '_' _..__ _ JG
- - - -- - pIons, dranings, sDecifiw-
tions, and/or inlormolion PRAWN BYfurnished her evith shall ~g remoin the Droperly of the
North $on Diego CountY CHECKED BY_ Tronsit Dislncf and shoji be pM held confldentiol~ and sholl
- -. __ not be used for ony purpose APPROVED BYnot prov~ded for in ogree- ~M AS-BUILT PLANS DegoS County Transit Dsricl DATE
DESCRIPTION BY ~„o APP FEBRUPRY 13, 2072
~j~AMTRAK
~E~~ 725 TOWN L COUNTRY RD
n SUITE 300RSSOQNTESN ~ . CA 92868
I ~~ \ ~.y,~ i x,
/
y .y ~ t \ ,~
,~'
t~ MAIN TR~ ,~ t~” i ~
~ \{ i
ti
~ `~
~ \i''~
~, 1
I I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1:
,,~; i',
I ~~
~
'~
t~
I
~ ~
, _ ~
r~. ,,'~d
~ ~f.
s~I EXIST W10-1
~ :. ~z! N W 481~A)l ~
~,,,.
ti~
\ ~~.c
iA
1 f i =: /
'~
~
~
~
O~ /
~g JOIN 3 ' CITY OF CARLSBAD R/W
`~ EXISTING - - ~ - — - - — - - -
- ___ - -- — s -- —
• JOIN
~ 9 EXISTING ~
~ LIMITS OF WDRK ~ ~
'mil —~ i ~ ~ — — — -- ~
i'' ; _ — — — — — — — — J
~2 R3-4 ~ I JDIN
, EXISTING
JOIN i ~ `
8 ~ EXISTING ~-'
] ~ ~ RELOCATE EXISTING BUS ,, y~
T STOP SIGN AND POST ~ _ _ —
t.; _ --- -- -- _--- -- - --- - = -f~ ~~_
~~C~TY OF CARLSBAD ~i/W ~""". _a=;,,
r. - i z
7~ y z
~,. ( Y \i
~ ~ r.

Irr:~ +r ~~ ..
~' ~°` i
A'
~ I y I 20' 10' 0 20' 40'
~-- ~~f
~ ~' ~ 1 ~ ~ GRAPHIC SCA~E~ P' 20'
/~ -~ Op0.0FE55i~, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION vv'."...V. '.V `~ y~P~'p~a~CK ~.,oy~fi~ SAN DIEGO SUBDIVISION, MP 229.3 TO MP 231.8 DRAWING No. ~A/t/CU'L N C T D ~ ~~ m ~' S' O 1
No.0058094 A CARLSBAD DOUBLE TRACK PROJECT
Ex .06i . /t2 *
REVISION O SHEET No. 4 3
' SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN
4jE ~""` ~~" CANNON ROAD SCALE
a~A~,~ AS SHOWN

TO SAN DIEGO

TO COUNTY LINE
-♦
• ♦- _RR WEST

RR EAST
4 '" r
Y.
' t
. ~ - ~~ ~trt
-. ~ ._ . '.
~ .~
~
M
'!
`'~~
.:
r. `i.~ ~, ~i
i ~ ` ~; ;~1I ,..w -, , Y
O ~"
_ __
„ .
~ r ~ ~~.s~ EXIST 42" SS (CITY OF CARLSBAD) EXIST 12" HP CAS (SCG) ~ ~ ~ !~ ~ '~y• ~
I~i'.
~ hM ~~.
p-- ^^-~'- '- -=_ __-= =-= '-: ~ , = . -_ _ __ : _-" _ ' _ ' _ - = - = - --= - --- _~- =-~-~ ~' - ~~ -rte- -- - - - -_ - - -++ew=-= - - -. =- -off -_ _~~y -:- _.:~t - - -- - - -- - - ,~.--- -~ -- -- - ~- ~ir~~ -s, r` -- - - - - --:_ ,. '~...
a .t~_~-
- .~
.. - - --
~•• ~ c
c
~,. - `
c. ~-c-^ Cr-c
` ~ `"' - ~y ~ r:~ rsr tic ~ia~
~ ~r~~~ rt' ,.: ..,~.}}~.~:.~t~~.T~,~'~ ~ '1.`. 1'•'kt hK~ Ir"~ ~`~ *'t.. _,(+'c. - i [N TRACK t,~, }. ~ ;•.: ~`yy '~ :r..._ •.
r ~~
X ~ ~ zz~~+~~ . r ' ' ~ 22~5t~~
22~~
w C7
~ 2210+00 2205+00
220(
z~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EXISTING MAIN TRACK 2 ~ „~ y a ~, ~3
JDI - ~'-
~ ------ - -TOR /W - -- -- -- -- -- - _ `~`a ~ -- --
2 - EIOMI_ ~._ ~ _ -' OH)_ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _^ _ _ - _ _ - _ - _ _- _ _( Unl- ~ _ _' -Ei ^u '_ -' __ - -jy0 - - E GHI ~- {~C-- ±UON1_ _ _ EIOH) ~ >
'~
' ~ .'
~ E~o~, ..
~;
_ t ~ ~..

NOTES-•

1. FOR TRACK PLAN, SEE DRAWING NOS. RP-Ol THRU RP-11.

2. FOR TYPICAL CROSS-SECTIONS, SEE DRAWING NOS. RC-Ol THRU RC-04.

3. FOR EARTHWORK CROSS-SECTIONS, SEE DRAWING NOS. RX-01 THRU RX-12. 4, FOR SURVEY CONTROL, SEE DRAWING NOS. VA-01 AND VA-02. o SEE CITY OF CARLSBAD GENERAL NOTES ON DRAWING N0. GI-04 FOR WORK WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.

N
n
i
.3
0 v
nvv
N
O
U
s0
E0i
~~~
U O
T~~~ 0~~~\
a'~ao N
a~
Underg round Servlae Alert
~ w ~ '~ Coll: TOIL FREE
1-800
o in
227 -2600
iwG wORRtMG D~vS
ecroee rou me
Informolion confdenliol of DESIGNED BY NBGIons, droeing5, 5pecifico- tions, and/or inFormolion
furnished herewith shoo DRAWN BY
i remain the yroperly of the
North Son Diego County
RI
CHECKED BY PM~ ~
°u w
Tronsit DiSln[t ono Sho&Oe
held conlidentiol~ and sholl
not be used for ony purpose
not provided for in ogres- gppROVED BY
~ ~
a ~
mints With the North San
Diego Covnty ironsit District.
pM
0 02 -13-12 AS-BUILT PLANS DATE
REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY ain APP
FEBRUARY 13, 2012 ~
PLAN

POTHOLE SCHEDULE

STREET POTHOLE
NUMBER

DISTANCE FROM

EXISTING TRACK

APPROXIMATE

STATION DEPTH ELEVATION DESCRIPTION

OF UTILITY

TOP OF RAIL
(TOR)

DEPTH -TOR
TO TOP Of PIPE
CANNON RD. PH-1 25 2225.90 4.12/6.00 38.93 ELECTRIC 45.34 6.41 CANNON RD. PH-2 25 2226.30 7.30/9.03 37.76 WATER 45.26 7.50 CANNON RD. PH-3 25 2226.54 6.92/8.92 38.18 SANITARY SEWER 45.22 7.04 CANNON RD. PH•4 27.5 2226.69 6.83/7.10 38.18 GAS 45.19 7.01 CANNON RD. PH-5 27.5 2226.74 6.6/8.42 38.18 GAS 45.18 7.00 PH-6 25 2232.75 / / WATER
PRIVATE CROSSING PH-7 56 2242.49 1.44/2.40 44.98 CAS
PH-8 13 2245.40 1.16/2.50 37.39 CAS 41.04 3.65
PH-8-1 25 2245.40 0.78/2.10 37.17 CAS 41.04 3.87
PH-9 25 2247.60 5.46 32.12 9'UTILITY TUNNEL 39.13 6.41
PH-10 25 2281.41 5.12/7.22 24.59 SAMTARY SEWER 35.60 11.01 PH-11 25 2285.99 4.67/6.00 31.81 WATER 39.21 7.48
PH-12 17.5 2286.09 1.00 24.38 SANITARY SEWER 39.29 14.91 PH-13 36 2289.34 4.12/6.00 36.89 CAS 41.81 4.92
PH-14 21.84 2290.51 4.12/6.00 42.30 SS MPNHOLE 42.51 0.21 TAMARACK AVE. PH-15 25 2291.85 5.32/6.91 38.93 CABLE TV 42.75 3.82 TAMARACK AVE. PH-16 25 2291.93 / 38.93 ELECTRIC 42.75 3.82 TAMARACK AVE. PH-17 25 2292.04 / 37.69 WATER 43.14 5.45 TAMARACK AVE. PH-18 25 2292.13 5.78/6.46 34.43 Est. STORM DRAIN 43.18 8.75 TAMARACK AVE. PH-19 25 229217 1.50 / TELEPHONE / /
TAMARACK AVE. PH-20 25 2292.21 7.62/9.70 36.16 SIQJITARY SEWER 43.21 7.05 TAMARACK AVE. PH-21 25 2292.26 2.60/4.44 / CABLE TV /
TAMARACK AVE. PH-22.1 25 2292.34 37.31 GAS 43.26 5.95
PH-23 23.09 2293.46 42.77 SS MANHOLE 43.69 0.92
PH-24 26 2304.1U / SANITARY SEWER /
PH-25 26 2307.64 30.35 STORM DRAIN 44.88 14.53
PH-26 25 2314.24 36.7 Est. STORM DRAIN 45.2 8.5 Est.

CHESTNUT AVE. PH-27 15 2314.62 35.78 WATER 45.22 9.44
PH-28 15 2315.13 40.40 TELEPHONE 45.25 4.85
WALNUT ST. PH-29 25 2319.50 25.43 SANITARY SEWER 45.26 19.83 CANNON R0. PH-30 25 2226.87 40.56 TELEPHONE 45.15 4.59
CANNON RD. PH-31 25 2225.66 40.39 CABLE TV 45.35 4.96
'j~AMTRAK ~~
~~~+ N C T D
PgTTEpSON ~ZS TOUN L COUNTRT RD
~ SUITE S00
~. ~~Suw.~~' ORANGE. CA 92868
40' 20' 0 40' 80'
GRAPHIC SCALE HORIZ 1" - 40'
I~ DEPTH CALCULATED

FROM DIPPING MANHOLES
PppFFSS/ NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
`opa`~' "B a``"~ SAN DIEGO SUBDIVISION, MP 229.3 TO MP 231.8 y"' CARLSBAD DOUBLE TRACK PROJECT
No. 37532 A
EXP.6/~, UTILITY PLAN -SHEET 1 OF 6
> c,vi~ P EXMT 2200 *00 TO EXMT 2212 *00
~~~ ^"`~ MP 231.87 TO MP 231.64
~ vR".,~"V "V U A- 01
0 I...,__, ..... 7 7

AS SHOWN

TO COUNTY LINE

TO SAN DIEGO
ItL.?_
`•+ ~~) ~py ~~y}
., ,~O ' 4:~.~ --- EXIST 42 P SS (CITY OF CARLSBAD)
EXIST 42" SS (CITY OF CARLSBAD) EXIST 12" HP GAS ISCG) >-. ~
O - id.; ~rt~ -~ ~ EXISTING MAIN TRACK 1 Q
+ ~ .: ~ -~. tea,, _ s -. _ AINTACK i
~
i +
+; __I~~,.~1
`
'.-
y ..

N2 ---------- -- ------- ----------- -- -~' —'~ -- -+~ -- - -. - - -- - -- —~~.— ~-7 N ao: ~ ~.... 'i, . R
/`~ `~r. -,~.. .y~ .{a7 +,, v Syr ~ ~~) ,~, f,
T. ~..~`; ~c ., y~iy.h1
,_'y'i°.a:

N~e .:~ Srtu.... ~'y ;t~ 1 ~ ~., ~~;+~~. r• Y'~ '~, fs '.` .. ~l.i.i'.. 7}u ',~ ~~ ~;,~~1P't'Y }.s~i. ~;~~. I'~~ 1;'~;~e'"~~
N'
P~ r+ r ~ p
~ ~ 222 +~~
.t 2215+00 X
W ~ - w C~
O
w 2220+00 2215+00
wm
wQ
Z w I ~ EXISTING MAIN TRACK 2 IERMT) I Z ~
..
~
- EIp11- —'-.. E10. ~ EIONI- ~ - - _ - - ~- - EIONI- - EIONl- -EIOHI +.r k EIONI EIOHI~ p'~•.' f _ _ _ _ _'_ ~ — y~) _ _ _ _ _ _. - — — ~ _... -EIOM- — _ _- _ _ _ElOx1- ~ —.— _. _ _.. -. EIOH1- _ _ _._ _ _ _.E~~_ _ _ _ _ ., ~~~ ~ 1 = w • ~..... ' SR.: rte. • ~
i ~. ~ h~+~ ~.~ '~ ~ ~
~1 p ~; ~
. `
i . ~. ~ ' t
`, 4, j~ i ~ i
r~l . . ~ ~ h~ ~a
.. °r. ~{
~ o
Yt ~_. `ar. a +. t~
NOTES
no' 20' o aD'~ 80'

PLAN EXIST TEL (AT&T)

1. FOR TRACK PLAN, SEE DRAWING NOS. RP-Ol THRU RP-11. 6. FOR UTILITY CASING EXTENSIONS, SEE DRAWING NOS. UD-01 THRU UD-06. GRAPHIC SCALE HORIZ 1" = 40'

2. FOR TYPICAL CROSS-SECTIONS, SEE DRAWING NOS. RC-01 THRU RC-04. EXIST 18" RCP SD (CITY OF CARLSBAD)

3. fOR EARTHWORK CROSS-SECTIONS, SEE DRAWING NOS. RX-Ol iHRU RX-12.

4. FOR SURVEY CONTROL, SEE DRAWING NOS. VA-01 AND VA-02. EXIST 8" AC WATER ICITY OF CARLSBAD)

5. FOR POTHOLE SCHEDULE, SEE DRAWING NO.UA-01. ggqN ONED TEL (AT&D ~ y
,vy..~ ~~, , .. ~-~ ~ - / EXIST 42" 55 (pT~+~,~OF CARLSBAD) , ~ " ~ ~ ~ I I „ t'~'~ W ~ `~ 'u I I ; I I +..- 1 EXIST ELEC (SDG~EI
' -,~; ~ EXIST 12" CAS (SCG1 P I , ..
i
• ~ ~ ~ ~
_ ~_ `v ~IST"TEL (AT&T) ~: ~ ~ ~' ~ t_ ~. ~ ~i,~ t i € r i ! e ~ k ~ ~CI~M~ ~SUP~~R~ E£3~O
~
M
w uDD CONCRETE E'~
......
t 4
_ ~~so i (SEE NOTE 6)
EXISTING OVERHEAD POrvER I SDGBE 1 :.j.. ~.. ;: > ~. ~
~ MAIN TRACK 1 IMT01l _,,.. •- L, t_W__°? ~
'
I ~' ADD 15' OF 20" SPLIT STEEL C/1SING~
~ono
i
Q,
'-
..•., - .y~ _ _ _ _ _ _ ...;.; - -
p ADDED 15' OF 16" SPLIT STEEL CA51
-- +W O
--- W--- - - -- -W "~------ W-- - - - - -- ,~ , I ~ tSEENOTE6)~ ~ X A ~- EXIST 2-24" RGP, W T~ 'u.. L.._. I' ~ II , O
RETAINING WALL ~'' 2-~fr" ~°If'EL CASMGS~ ~ I7 Grp ' EXIST 30" RCP SD 13000 O) ~ ~v-~ _ OF 12" STEEL CASING (SDG&E) r ~ ; .,~ r _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ (CITY OF CARLSBAD), 13' BELOW BASE OF RNL ,~ ~ T -.~ BAD)
--ssc
p — -~ -' 5 ~--r- - - "- -- =_ ^`_- - - -- - ` -= - -er r` 'a"r`_~.. `- - - (CIT
- - - - ~ =~ - - - _-- - - - - -~~' ~ - -
_~ G.
i
`
r-w xn ~1~
N ~ -x x x_ x _ x ~ —'c ~c -'~:- -. -.-- ~.,_ x— x=.~- - - ~r -_-, _ . ~s_~,
I - - — N ~
~ if ~! 'I • ~ ~ ` , ~~ ~^ ~ ~ ' T ~ u ~J EXIST CTV IN CONC ENCASEMENT (TIME WARNERI~ w A ~~`
"' !
~
OTHOLES { F-
POTHOLE PH-6
~ ~ 2235 +00
q r l 2225 +Q0 ~ Jz23 ., Q PH-1 THRU PH-5
x z '. ~ x
o w ~ ~ ~, ! ww
o
N ~ "'~~ ~
_ O
~ ~ - ._ _..._ _ _;;235 +09 — — -- - r __ __ ..... _ P A _ _ _ — -_ I ~ 2231.q~10 ApD 13'OF 24"SLIT STEEL C SING (BY SDG6E1 I ~ m Q`.I
E
o
w Q ~ ERISTING MAIN TI~QCK 2 IEXMTI_ ~ ~;, ; ~ ~' ' - - - ~ -~"~" '~v~i ADD 13'Of 6" SPLIT STEEL CASING (BY SOG&EI ~ - N 100'OFO 0" STL C SNGI(S0~&E) w Z ~ : , 4 Q... .~ ° -" +~- -- -- _.._ro -- -- -_ _ __.... ~.i._' N _..I. ~,-,._ _ EXIST 24" RCP *SD (3000 D> z W

4..,,~:~ ~.t5
UQG
~.~, ~ ~
— ~ ; ,~ ~ .a. ,~ 4 ,y ~ ~ ; ~ (CITY QF CARL38AD)~ W
J~~_ -
--- —~ -- - `~1:~:.`-'~A`~+ "t~~5 _r~'S __ -- -_ -- --— -- -NCTDR/W- -- --- --------- --- ------- ----- -- --- -. `
- -i-- 1 ~- s.- - -- — __:..._. ~
/
- ~ EIDn1- ~: 8"' ~ - - E10H,~'..- L-~~~w t. =~: Scow-►+~'•'7s:'-`s:--1 ~- .-tau- -._
- - - - .~ycww- - - - - ~- - e~oHi- - - - - - -uoH~- - - - -n - - -n~i- - - - - - - -no - - ~ - - EXIST OVERHEAD TEL (AT&T) -uoH~- - w
~~ ~
~ ~ ~
>, o o ~Q ~ c _
`_'
,, i u .;_ ~ ~ . -, = - .. _ EXIST 20" TM HP ~AS IN 55' OF 24" STL CASING (SDG&El ~ Z ~
~ `t EX ST 12" AC WATER IN 50' OF 20..

U W ~ ~ ,. . y ~ .:' y~ ~ ~ z tP : { x :: ~ ~ _
~ ~(/~ ~ '' ~ r i 1 ~ ~ ~ I ST CASING (CITY OF CARISBAD) U ~y~'i u? ~
a ~~ `~
~;,• . ~'~~ ,' +i~ _t, ~ 1 ,;` ~,' t": Z' L EXIST FIBER OPTIC CABLE (IST 3" HP CAS IN 55' OF 6" CND (SDC&E) ~~r' o I ~ "'~°' •~' '~-', ~" ~~ I ~ (VERIZON BUSINESS (MCUI ~ ~ I I ~r~:,~ Q '~`' EXIST 8" AC SS FORC~-MAtN7~"9P' OF ~ I Q
~ _~4_' STL CASING (CITY OF CA(~QAD) ' I L I-c~ - ~ - ~ -O- - - - Q~ ~ ~ ~~~ EX14 24" RCP SD (1350 D)
~ - - 5-S' BELOW BASE RNL I I ~ ~ I ~ (CIT OF CARLSBAD) PROPOSED 54" CML6C STEEL - ~- ~
WATER IN167'OF71 "SiEELCA5ING ; -- c - -- -- -- c-------- c -j -~o- (CITY OF CARLSBAD) —w--' EXIST 20" TM HP GAS (SDG~E> , I I ~Iz~ I~ Underground Service Alerl ~ ..~ ~ i
N OI
Call: TOLL FREE ~ ~ ~ -- ~ ~ Z+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; I~ ~ ~ 40' 20' 0 40' 80' 1 -800 EXIST 3" HP GAS cSDGB~E) ., ~; ; i i ~ ~ ICI ~
227 -2600 GRAPHIC SCALE HORIZ 1" • 40'
Y+~y
~ w
-"
a w
:~
~~ wC WORIfIMG DOTS
PLAN
PFlORE YOU DIC
-
Informolion confidential all
Pons,ond/or9nlormo~o~-
furnished herewith =ho~~
DESIGNED BY "B
~j~p M T R A K ~~
~ ~op0.~FE55iQ,,(
~" Q~'"" "ate f~

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
SAN DIEGO SUBDIVISION MP 229.3 TO MP 231.8
CONTRACT NO.

DRAWN BY R, DRAWING No.
i
~~
remon the property of the
North San ie o Count
Tronsit Dis~~ri~~ and 5~0~ oe ~a/~~s N c T D
,p y
~~
~
~~ C AR L S B AD D O U B L E TRACK P R O J E C T ~

CHECKED BY
w held confitlenlial: antl shdi
nol bpre used for any purpose
menls~~ilhdthe~NOrth9S n
Diego County Trons'it
PM
~,pPROVED BY
PM
No. 3~53Z
* EXP.6/ ~
~'~ ~~sr ~,v~~ ~
UTILITY PLAN -SHEET 2 OF 6
EXMT 221200 TO EXMT 223600
_
~~w~
8 725 T0'~N ~ COUNTRY RD
~pgp~T~ ~ry~, SUiTE 300
REVISION O SHEET N0. 7 8
~w
0 02-13-12 AS-BUILT PLANS DniE
SCALE
AS SHOW Na ~ District .+~..~ ORnNCE. CA 92866 4rf
a ~~~~f
T
MP 231.64 ~ MP 231.19
REV SATE DESCRIPTION BY wB ApPa ~
FEBRUARY 13.2012 1

r
N
M
o+
0 s
nv
n°
N
O
V
O
O
i
~~~o
T p
0 p~ aN N
C ~ ~ ~

0. =.40 N
°u
a

GENERAL NOTES

A CASING PIPE UNDER TRACKS AND ACROSS RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL EXTEND TO THE GREATER OF THE FOLLOWING DISTANCES - 2 FEET BEYOND TOE OF SLOPE.
- 3 FEET BEYOND DITCH,
- A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 25 FEET FROM CENTER OF OUTSIDE TRACK WHEN END OF CASING IS BELOW GROUND.

B. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL EXCAVATIONS ANO TEMPORARY SHORING REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION.

C. EXCAVATION AND SHORING PLANS SHPLL CONSIDER THE RAILWAY LOADING OF ADJACENT LIVE TRACKS AND TRENCH SAFETY AS

REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
D. CONTRACTOR SHALL DEWATER AS REQUIRED TO MWNTAIN THE GROUNDWATER LEVEL AT LEAST 2 FEET BELOW THE BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION ANO PROVIDE DRY WORKING CONDITIONS.

E. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING PIPES, CONDUITS. UNDERGROUND PIPING AND ANY OTHER UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINING WORK.

F. PRIOR TO PERFORM THE FIELD WELDS, TO JOIN THE CASING EXTENSION TO THE EXISTING CASING AND THE WELDS TO JOIN THE

TWO HALF'S OF THE NEW EXTENSION, THE AREAS OF THE PIPE TO RECEIVE THE WELDS SHALL BE CRINDED TO BRIGHT METAL, AND AFTER THE WELDS ARE COMPLETED THE WELDS SHALL BE GROUND SMOOTH.

G. IF THE END OF THE EXISTING CASING PIPE IS DAMAGED, BENT OR UNEVEN, CUT BACK AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SQUARE EVEN JOINT TO THE NEW CASING.

H. FILL THE ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN THE CASING AND PIPE TO MATCH THE MATERIAL IN THE EXISTING SECTION OF ENCASED PIPE, ie~ GROUT, SAND, ETC.

J. PROVIDE BEDDING, TYPE C FOR INDUCED TRENCH BEDDING AS PER PREMA, CHAPTER B, PART 10.

K. TRENCH RESURFACING IN CITY STREETS SHALL CONFORM TO CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDAf2D NOS. CS-25 AND GS-26.

SUGGESTED INSTALLATION PROCEDURE
i. EXCAVATE TO EXPOSE THE EXISTING CASING AND THE CARRIER PIPE, DEEP ENOUGH TO BE ABLE TO INSTALL THE BOTTOM HALF Of THE NEW CASING PIPE.

2. INSTALL THE CASING SPACERS TO THE CARRIER PIPE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. ie.~ CALPICO, INC. 1650-588-2241) OR (800-996-9115) OR CASCADE (630-553-0840) OR (800-426.4301) OR ANY OTHER MANUFACTURER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.

3. INSTALL THE TOP HALF OF THE CASING PIPE.

4. TACK WELD THE TWO PIECES TOGETHER AT THE ENDS AND CENTER OF THE CASING PIPE EXTENSION.

5. WELD THE CASING PIPE AND GRIND SMOOTH THE WELDS.

6. WELD THE CASING PIPE EXTENSION TO THE EXISTING CASING PIPE (SEE NOTE f AND G).

7. FILL THE ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN THE CASING AND THE PIPE. (SEE NOTE H) B. INSTALL NEOPRENE END SEAL AT THE END OF NEW CASING EXTENSION AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. ie.~ CALPICO. INC. (650-588.2241) OR (800-998-9115) OR CASCADE (630-553.0840) OR (800-426-4301) OR ANY OTHER MANUFACTURER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.

9. BACKFILL THE EXCAVATED AREA, HAND COMPACT BACKFILL IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 10".

10. REINSTALL THE SUBGRADE MATERIAL.

11. REINSTALL THE BALLAST UNDER THE TIES AND FILL THE CRIBS.

12. HAND TAMP THE TRACK AND OPEN FOR TRAFFIC, UNDER RAILROAD SUPERVISION, TOP HALF OF SPLIT CASING

GRIND OFF A CHAMFER ON

LONGITUDINAL EDGE ANC

FILLET WELD ON-SITE
(JOINT AT HORIZONTAL
AS-BUILT Pl ANS

DESCRIPTION
PRE-WELD D.I. BAR %8' 1

WIDE ALONG LONGITUDIN
OF BOTTOM HALF OF C.
~ DETAIL
SCALE~NONE
!' C.H. BAO
~r~A M T R A KDRAWN BY p
the ZUCCHI
~Ie CHECKED BY M. COLJI
a~E~~ 725 TOMN L COUHtRY RD
~~ NSSOCIRTE~, ~ ATE 300
p~~
19 ORMKE. CA 92868
Bose
n
PROVED BY H. SOLAR7E
dricl. DATE FEBRUARY 13, 2012
,j~
"~A
Yi
U i
4 ~--
~I
z
i
Y
~I
a
~~-
EXIS7iNG
~I
x
"' ~
i
~~
~,~
GROUND
_ —
~I
— — ti---== __- - -_`— — — —
2'-0••
MIN.

EXISTING CASING PIPE

SHORING AS REQUIRED
~BY CONTRACTOR
A
NOTE 6 NEOPRENE
X16 END SEAL
(SEE NOTE 8>
— —
—~
s~~b NOTE F
SPLIT STEEL PIPE I 516

TYPICAL SECTION - SPLIT STEEL PIPE CASING
SCA~E~

BOTTOM OF SUBGRADE

HAND COMPACT BACKFILL IN

LAYERS USING PIPE BEDDING
CL0.SS C PER AREMA
TOTE F
T/R
5/g" LIFTING LUG STEEL CASING..

EXISTING UTILITY
`.1 /\
~?
` 1
.. '. '\I~~ .. ..

LNG DIAMETER _ V_ CASING SPACERS
MIN. ~ (SEE NOTE 2)
q SECTION
- SCALE~NONE
a
a
SEE DETAiL 1
C~ ~ ~~~,aaRHON~B~~y NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION ~~ c SAN DIEGO SUBDIVISION, MP 229.3 TO MP 231.8
rir/bar~ N c r v CARLSBAD DOUBLE TRACK PROJECT
No. 54138 p
* EXP.12/31/13 , SPLIT STEEL CASING EXTENSIONS
''r,~T`~'~~"R~' GENERAL NOTES & TYPICAL DETAILS
~R,.~~~N~ ~~~. U D - 01
REVISION O SHEET N0. 83
SCALE

AS SHOWN

~ ;~ W _ ~ ,I,_.t ,~~ ..I ~
~ I Q~ I a ~ ~ ~ ~~ I~ -~
• , ~ ,\ Z
~ iil ,a
~. ~ ~ Z r~~ ~ '~ .

W ~ ~p ( I I 1.
~~ V
r ~„~ ~ _ .
-{-r — G -~--- — — —
CANNON ROAD G I I I - ~ ~I_
-- --~- - - -~- i - S P --~-- -_ - .- - ~ --i- ~ ~ . -- S ~ - -- --- - ~ EXIST 8 qC SS FORCE M(J N IN 5D' 0~
D za° sn cksl i (CITY OFI CARLSBAD ~ qpD ONCRETE y INC SUPPORT I G~ ~ ~ ~- - ~ i- —I —mow — _ c~— +-- -{~}- v,~ ~
EXIST X12"~ A WATER IN`50' OF 20" ADD SPLIT STEEL CASING ~ ~ ~~ ~ D ~ ST~SI G~~ITY OF C{~RLSBAD) I I CANNON ROAD
~J ~ --__ ~
—~
~. w `°
.,r, ~ r O
-r
- - EX Y€RMiEAD L (~j -- 1 EC T V
r,.
•

EXISTING PIPE AND CONCRETE CASING DIMENSION TO BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR ~ CONCRETE CASING SUPPORT

CONCRETE CASING SUPPORT PER

STL CASING (CITY OF CARLSBAD)
50'-0"

INSTALLED CONCRETE

ENCASEMENT
STA 2226 *30 SECTION
SCALES ~/8" 1'
NOTES=

1. fOR INSTALLATION PROCEDURES AND DETAILS, SEE DRAWING N0. UD-O7.

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
CONTRACT No.

SAN DIEGO SUBDIVISION, MP 229.3 TO MP 231.8 DRAWING N0.

U D - O2

CARLSBAD DOUBLE TRACK PROJECT
REVISION 0 SHEET N0. 84

SPLIT STEEL CASING EXTENSIONS
SHEET 1 OF S SCALE
qS SHOWN

18" 32"
32"
11"
B.S.
60"

11"
B.S.

FOR LEVELING BOLTS

TYPICAL ARRANGEMENT

WELDED IN PLACE
3" GALVANIZED COUPLING

FOR LEVELING BOLTS

TYPICAL ARRANGEMENT
3" PIPE NIPPLE

WELDED IN PLACE
3" GALVANIZED COUPLING
OF
NONE
ESD-8255
1 1GALVANIZED STEEL SIGNAL AND GATE FOUNDATION
ATTACHED TO THE FOUNDATION.

IN A WATER TIGHT CONTAINER SECURELY

STEEL AND SHALL BE PACKAGED SEPARATELY

BOLTS, WASHERS AND NUTS SHALL BE CADMIUM

LEVELING

BOLTS TO BE THREADED TO ALLOW FOR
HEX HEADS, 12 NUTS AND 16 FLAT WASHERS.

FURNISHED WITH 4 EA 1'' X 8'' BOLTS WITH
FOUNDATIONS TO BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED.1.

2. 3.

4. NOTES:

IN BOTTOM OR TOP OF COUPLING.

ATTACHED TO ALLOW PLACEMENT OF 3" PIPE NIPPLE
WELDED TO FOUNDATION. COUPLINGS SHALL BE
STANDARD 3" GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE COUPLINGS
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION DES. ENG.

DATE
DRAWN

RECOMMENDED

CHECKED

ENGINEERING STANDARD DRAWINGS
DRAWING NO.

SCALE:

DRAWING SHEET NO.

CONTRACT SHEET NO.

REVISIONS
www.sandag.org
San Diego, CA. 92101
401 B Street, Suite 800

SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
www.gonctd.com
Oceanside, CA 92054
810 Mission Avenue

DESIGNER PE STAMP
PRE, INC.

E. ROE
W. PREY
FEBRUARY 2015
SANDAG/NCTD ENGINEERING STANDARDS ARE INTENDED FOR SANDAG/NCTD APPROVED USES ONLY.

FOR NON-SANDAG/NCTD APPROVED USES:

SANDAG/NCTD SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE DATA OR INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN. THE SELECTION AND USE OF THESE STANDARDS IS THE SOLE

RESPONSIBILITY OF THE USER AND SHOULD NOT BE USED WITHOUT CONSULTING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. ALL WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND ARE DISCLAIMED. ANYONE MAKING USE OF THIS INFORMATION AGREES THAT IT ASSUMES ALL LIABILITY ARISING FROM SUCH USE. NO PART OF THESE STANDARDS SHOULD BE REPRODUCED OR

DISTRIBUTED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SANDAG/NCTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
16'MAX. 6' MIN.
36"
30' MIN.
4'-6" MIN. 4'-6" MIN.
4'-6" MIN.

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

OF TRACK. MINIMUM OF 12' MUST BE MAINTAINED.
15' IS THE DESIRABLE CLEARANCE FROM CENTER LINE

9. IS TYPICAL, MAY BE LOCATED IN ANY QUADRANT.

XING HOUSE, CASE AND METER SERVICE LOCATION
W

TW. 2C#6 TO TRK.

TW. 2C#6 TO TRK.
(TYPICAL LOCATION)

CURB FACE

CROSS SECTION VIEW
7C#6 TO HOUSE
TWO-4" SCH. 80 PVC
9' MIN.

TW. 2C#6 TO HOUSE
3C#2 TO HOUSE

HOUSE
XING
10X8
(TYPICAL LOCATION)

A/C METER SERVICE
SPARE CONDUITS TO BE CAPPED.

TO BE APPROVED BY FIELD ENGINEER.

SIDE OF TRACK FOR LOCATION OF CONDUIT
TYPICAL LOCATION OF SIX 4" SCH 80 PVC.
7C#14 TO HOUSE
OF THE 10X8 HOUSE.

CONDUIT TO BE PLACED UNDER TRACK IN FRONT
OF
NONE
ESD-8266
1 1
SIX-4" SCH. 80 PVC
TWO-4" SCH. 80 PVC
7C#6 TO HOUSE
7C#14 TO HOUSE
7C#6 TO HOUSE
7C#14 TO HOUSE
7C#14 TO GATE #4
7C#6 TO GATE #4
7C#6 TO GATE #1
7C#14 TO GATE #1
7C#6 TO GATE #4
7C#14 TO GATE #4
7C#6 & 7C#1 4
TO GATE #2
7C#6 & 7C#1 4
TO GATE #3
#4
GATE
#3
GATE
#2
GATE
#1
GATE
APPROACHING TRAINS.

LC2-001WB-W AND PLACED ON TRACK SIDE, VISIBLE TO
CROSSING SHELTERS. LAMP SHALL BE VELCORP GEMS P/N

POWER OFF LIGHT SHALL BE INSTALLED ON GRADE
NOTES:

NEAR RAIL. VARIATION ONLY ON APPROVAL BY NCTD.

XING HOUSE AND CASE LOCATED 25' FROM
TO BE PLACED IN 4" SCH. 80 PVC.

CABLE UNDER TRACK, SIDEWALKS AND ROADWAYS
VARIATION ONLY ON APPROVAL BY NCTD.

GATES LOCATED 15' FROM CENTERLINE OF TRACK.

TRACK LEADS LOCATED MIN. 50' FROM CURB FACE.
120' MIN. ISLAND CIRCUIT LENGTH.

THREE - 4" SCH 80 PVC

WITH GATES AND MEDIAN

FLASHING LIGHT SIGNALS

TYPICAL LOCATION
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION DES. ENG.

DATE
DRAWN

RECOMMENDED

CHECKED

ENGINEERING STANDARD DRAWINGS
DRAWING NO.

SCALE:

DRAWING SHEET NO.

CONTRACT SHEET NO.

REVISIONS
www.sandag.org
San Diego, CA. 92101
401 B Street, Suite 800

SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
www.gonctd.com
Oceanside, CA 92054
810 Mission Avenue

DESIGNER PE STAMP
PRE, INC.

E. ROE
W. PREY
FEBRUARY 2015

Appendix E

CARB Fleet Compliance Certification
City Attorney Approved Version 12/14/2023

DISCLOSURE & SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT

VEHICLE EMISSION DISCLOSURE & COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT.

This Project is subject to the following regulation(s) by the California Air Resources Board. In bidding this Project, it shall be the Bidder’s sole responsibility to evaluate and include the cost of complying with all equipment and vehicle emission requirements under this Contract and applicable law in its Bid.

ADVANCED CLEAN FLEETS.

Vehicles with a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) greater than 8,500 lbs. and light -duty package delivery vehicles operated in California may be subject to the California Air Resources Board Advanced Clean Fleets regulations. Such vehicles may therefore be subject to requirements to reduce emissions of air pollutants. For more information, please visit the CARB Advanced Clean Fleets webpage at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/advanced-clean- fleets.

Bidders utilizing subcontractors shall provide a signed certificate of reported compliance for each listed subcontractor in the space provided in the Proposed Subcontractors form. Bidders, and its subcontractors must be registered as compliant fleet s at the time of bid submittal. In the event that a bidder, or its subcontractors, are exempt from this regulation, the bidder must submit a signed statement attesting to the fact, and to the reason(s) why it is not subject to the High Priority and Federal Fleets Regulation of Title 13, CCR Section 2015 through 2015.6 and the State and Local Government Fleets Regulation of Title 13, CCR Section 2013 through 2013.4.

Failure to certify as a compliant fleet or provide an attestation to an exemption, may render the bid non-responsive.

IN-USE OFF-ROAD DIESEL-FUELED FLEETS.

Any contractor utilizing off highway vehicles or equipment may be subject to compliance with the In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulation. For more information, please visit the CARB In-Use Off -Road Diesel -Fueled Fleets Regulation webpage at : https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our- work/programs/use-road-diesel-fueled-fleets-regulation.

Bidders shall submit with its Bid a valid California Air Resources Board certificate of reported compliance. Bidders utilizing subcontractors shall submit the DOORS ID number for each listed subcontractor in the space provided in the Proposed Subcontractors form. Bidders are responsible for including a certificate of reported compliance for each identified subcon tractor.

Failure to submit valid certificates may render the bid non-responsive.

GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS.

Contractor will keep fully informed of federal, state and local laws and ordinances and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by Contractor, or in any way affect the performance of the Services by Contractor. Contractor will at all times observe and comply with these laws, ordinances, and regulations and will be responsible for the compliance of Contractor's services with all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations.

Contractor will be aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and will comply with those requirements, including, but not limited to, verifying the eligibility for employment of all agents, employees, subcontractors and consultants whose services are required by this Agreement.

City Attorney Approved Version 12/14/2023

Contractor is aware of the requirements of the emissions reduction regulations being mandated by the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) and that it will comply with all applicable regulations before commencing the performance of the work and maintain compliance throughout the duration of this Agreement.

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD.

The California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) implemented amendments to the In-Use Off-Road Diesel- Fueled Fleets Regulations (“Regulation”) which are effective on January 1, 2024, and apply broadly to all self-propelled off-road diesel vehicles 25 horsepower or greater and other forms of equipment used in California. A copy of the Regulation is available at:

https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/regact/2022/off-roaddiesel/appa-1.pdf

Bidders are required to comply with all CARB and Regulation requirements, including, without limitation, all applicable sections of the Regulation, as codified in Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations section 2449 et seq. throughout the term of the Project. Bidders must provide, with their Bid, copies of Bidder’s and all listed subcontractors the most recent, valid Certificate of Reported Compliance (“CRC”) issued by CARB. Failure to provide valid CRCs as required herein may render the Bid non-responsive.

The City of Carlsbad is a Public Works Awarding Body, as that term is defined under Title 13 California Code of Regulations section 2449(c)(46). Accordingly, Bidders must submit, with their Bids, valid Certificates of Reported Compliance (“CRC”) for the Bidder’s fleet, and for the fleets of any listed subcontractors (including any applicable leased equipment or vehicles). Bidders must complete and submit the Fleet Compliance Certification, on the form provided. Failure to provide a CRC for the Bidder, and for all listed subcontractors, or failure to complete the Fleet Compliance Certification, may render the Bid non-responsive.

COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD REGULATIONS.

Contractor shall comply, and shall ensure all subcontractors comply, with all applicable requirements of the most current version of the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) regulations including, without limitation, all applicable terms of Title 13, California Code of Regulations Division 3, Chapter 9 and all pending amendments (“Regulation”).

Throughout the Project, and for three (3) years thereafter, Contractor shall make available for inspection and copying any and all documents or information associated with Contractor’s and subcontractors’ fleet including, without limitation, Certificates o f Reported Compliance (“CRC”), fuel/refueling records, maintenance records, emissions records, and any other information the Contractor is required to produce, keep or maintain pursuant to the Regulation upon two (2) calendar days’ notice from the City of Carlsbad.

Contractor shall be solely liable for any and all costs associated with complying with the Regulation as well as for any and all penalties, fines, damages, or costs associated with any and all violations, or failures to comply with the Regulation. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad , its officials (appointed and elected), officers, and employees from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Regulation.

City Attorney Approved Version 12/14/2023
FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION.

Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the CARB’s policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the “Regulation”). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to the penalty of perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder’s fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) (“Fleet”) is true and correct:
□ The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto.

□ The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under Section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto.

□ Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to Section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. , third party correspondence or vendor bids).

□ The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to Section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an “emergency”, as that term is defined in Section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to Section 2449(i)(4).

□ The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempt and a detailed reasoning is attached to this certification.

Name of Bidder:

Signature:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Appendix F

Environmental Reference Documents

Carlsbad Boulevard Water
Improvements at Terramar Project

Addendum #3 to the
City of Carlsbad Sewer Master Plan and
Carlsbad Municipal Water District
Master Plans Update
Program Environmental Impact Report

SCH No. 2012021006
EIR 12-01

Prepared for:

Carlsbad Municipal Water District
5950 El Camino Real
Carlsbad, CA 92008-8802

Prepared by:

HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc.
7578 El Cajon Boulevard
La Mesa, CA 91942

March 2023 | 01174.00005.005

This page intentionally left blank

i
Table of Contents
Section Page

1.0 Purpose and Background ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 1

1.1 Applicability and Use of Addendum ................................................................................... 1

1.2 Format of This Addendum .................................................................................................. 2

1.3 Summary of Findings .......................................................................................................... 2

1.4 Lead Agency and Discretionary Approvals.......................................................................... 2

2.0 Description of the Proposed Project ................................ ................................ ....................... 2

2.1 Project Location .................................................................................................................. 2

2.2 Project Description ............................................................................................................. 2

2.3 Construction Methods ........................................................................................................ 4

2.4 Regulatory Compliance ....................................................................................................... 5

2.5 Project Design Features ...................................................................................................... 5

3.0 Environmental Setting ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 5

3.1 Existing Water Service and Master Plan (including 2019 Addendum) ............................... 5

3.2 Local and Regional Planning Context .................................................................................. 6

4.0 Environmental Analysis Checklist ................................ ................................ ........................... 7

4.1 Environmental Analysis Checklist Summary ....................................................................... 7

4.2 Individual Issue Areas ......................................................................................................... 8 I. Aesthetics ............................................................................................................... 8 II. Agriculture and Forestry Resources ..................................................................... 11 III. Air Quality ............................................................................................................ 13 IV. Biological Resources ............................................................................................ 16 V. Cultural Resources ............................................................................................... 20 VI. Energy .................................................................................................................. 22 VII. Geology and Soils ................................................................................................. 23 VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................................................................. 27 IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials ....................................................................... 29 X. Hydrology and Water Quality .............................................................................. 33 XI. Land Use and Planning ......................................................................................... 36 XII. Mineral Resources ............................................................................................... 37 XIII. Noise .................................................................................................................... 38 XIV. Population and Housing ....................................................................................... 40 XV. Public Services ..................................................................................................... 41 XVI. Recreation ............................................................................................................ 42

ii
Table of Contents (continued)
Section Page

XVII. Transportation ..................................................................................................... 43 XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources ..................................................................................... 45 XIX. Utilities and Service Systems ............................................................................... 47 XX. Wildfire ................................................................................................................ 49 XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance ..................................................................... 51

5.0 Applicable Project-specific Mitigation Measures ................................ ................................ ... 53

5.1 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................ 53

5.2 Geology and Soils .............................................................................................................. 54

6.0 References ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 56

7.0 Preparers ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 58

LIST OF APPENDICES

A Cultural Resources Study—Terramar Area Sewer & Water Main Improvements Project

LIST OF FIGURES

No. Title Follows Page

1 Regional Location ............................................................................................................................. 2 2 Project Location ............................................................................................................................... 2

LIST OF TABLES

No. Title Page

4-1 Environmental Analysis Checklist Summary ................................................................................... 7

iii
Acronyms and Abbreviations
AC asbestos cement
afy acre-feet per year
APN Assessor’s Parcel Number

BMPs best management practices

CAL FIRE California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CAP Climate Action Plan
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CIP capital improvement program
city City of Carlsbad
CMWD Carlsbad Municipal Water District
CO carbon monoxide
CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent

EIR environmental impact report

GHG greenhouse gases

HMP Habitat Management Plan

kWh kilowatt hour

LF linear feet

MGD million gallons per day
MMRP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MT metric ton

NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NOX nitrogen oxides
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

PEIR Program Environmental Impact Report
PM10 respirable particulate matter measuring 10 microns or less in diameter PM2.5 fine particulate matter measuring 2.5 microns or less in diameter PRC Public Resources Code

SCH State Clearinghouse
SDCWA San Diego County Water Authority
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board

USDOT U.S. Department of Transportation

This page intentionally left blank
Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 1 1.0 Purpose and Background
The City of Carlsbad (city) and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) are proposing an update to the existing Water Master Plan. The current Sewer, Water, and Recycled Water Master Plans (Master Plans), adopted in November 2012, were evaluated in a program environmental impact report (PEIR) prepared and certified by the city (State Clearinghouse [SCH] No. 2012021006). The Master Plans were updated in 2019 and an Addendum to the PEIR (2019 Addendum) was prepared to address the changes from the 2012 PEIR. A second Addendum to the PEIR (2022 Addendum) was prepared in 2022 to address modifications to two motorized valve projects contained in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. The proposed Project would update improvements included as part of the Water Master Plan.

The city and CMWD are responsible for the maintenance, operations, and management of sanitary sewer collection systems, and water and recycled water distribution systems in their respective service areas. The Master Plans represent comprehensive programs for the phased and orderly development of sewer, water, and recycled water infrastructure in response to future demands within the respective service areas. They consist of projects incorporated into a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to construct new facilities and modify or expand existing facilities. The 2012 PEIR and 2019 Addendum analyzed the potential physical impacts to the environment that would result from those improvements.

The 2022 Addendum addressed two specific project sites and did not revise the overall Master Plans.

This addendum is prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code §21000, et. Seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended (California Administrative Code, Title 14, §15000, et. Seq.).

1.1 Applicability and Use of Addendum
The 2012 PEIR contemplated the idea of “tiering” from the document to allow for subsequent environmental documents to focus on those issues specific to the later project which were not addressed in the PEIR. In particular, the environmental documents for a later project would focus on the environmental effects which are capable of being integrated or were not analyzed as significant effects on the environment in the PEIR. In effect, tiering enables agencies to analyze environmental issues that are ready for decision at each stage, and to exclude issues that have already been decided or that are not ready for decision.

The city and CMWD’s intent through preparation of this addendum is to demonstrate whether the previously adopted CEQA documents (2012 PEIR and 2019 Addendum), including mitigation measures, are still both adequate and valid for the proposed Project. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and the CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15162 through 15164, the city as the CEQA lead agency is required to conduct a fact-based evaluation of proposed changes to the Master Plan to determine whether supplemental environmental documentation is required. CEQA Guidelines, Section 15162(a), states that when an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is certified for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines that one of the conditions described in Section 15162(a) has occurred. Section 15164(a) provides that an addendum is appropriate if none of the conditions described in Section 15162(a) have occurred.

Based on the analysis set forth in this addendum, the city and CMWD have concluded that the proposed Project does not trigger any of these circumstances, and that an addendum is the appropriate form of documentation to comply with CEQA.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 2 1.2 Format of This Addendum
The PEIR and 2019 Addendum serve as the environmental compliance documents for the proposed Project, and this addendum provides additional clarification and information about the specific updates to the city’s Water Master Plan. This addendum should be read together with the full text of the previously certified PEIR (2012a), 2019 Addendum, and 2022 Addendum. Mitigation measures and project design features from the PEIR and 2019 Addendum, as provided in the Project-specific Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) found in Chapter 5 of this addendum, are incorporated by reference into this addendum. In addition, the addendum incorporates by reference the city’s General Plan Update, supporting PEIR (2015a), and Climate Action Plan (2015b).

This addendum relies on the use of an Environmental Checklist Form (Checklist), as suggested in Section 15063(d)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as amended.

1.3 Summary of Findings
Based upon the Checklist prepared for the proposed Project and supporting responses (Section 4), implementation of the proposed Project would not result in substantial changes requiring major revisions to the PEIR. Further, the proposed Project would not result in any environmental impacts that have not already been addressed in the PEIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. Since only minor additions and clarifications are required to the PEIR, and none of the conditions described in Public Resources Code Section 21166 or CEQA Guideline Section 15162 have occurred, the city and CMWD finds that the preparation of an addendum to the PEIR is appropriate and consistent with Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162-15164.

1.4 Lead Agency and Discretionary Approvals
This addendum and the PEIR are intended to serve as the environmental documentation for the proposed Project. The City of Carlsbad is the lead agency under CEQA and maintains authority to approve the addendum.

2.0 Description of the Proposed Project
CMWD is currently proposing the Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project (Project).

2.1 Project Location
The proposed Project is generally located in the northern part of San Diego County within the City of Carlsbad (Figure 1, Regional Location). The Project alignment is situated within the rights-of-way of Carlsbad Boulevard and Cannon Road in the western portion of the city (Figure 2, Project Location).

2.2 Project Description
The Project would replace approximately 5,000 linear feet (LF) of water mains, abandon and/or remove roughly 7,600 LF of aging asbestos cement (AC) water mains, and replace and/or rehabilitate approximately 1,500 LF of sewer mains and manholes. The Project is located on Carlsbad Boulevard !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!!!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
! !
! !
!
!
!!
! ! !
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
! !
! !
!
!!!
!
!
!!
!
!!
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
! !
! !
!! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!!!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!!!!!
!!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!!
!
!!!!!!
! ! ! ! !!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!"a$ ?¹
!"^$
?³
?¸!"^$
WÌ
!"a$ ?¸
?¸
?t WÊ
?¦
?¦%&s(
!"a$!"^$
WÌ
!"_$
!"_$
?n
Ag Aä
?Ë
?p
!"^$ %&u(
%&s(
?Ë
Aä
?p
?¹
POWAY

OCEANSIDE

CARLSBAD
VISTA

ESCONDIDO
OTAY

CHULA VISTA
SANTEE
SAN
MARCOS

ENCINITAS

EL CAJON

LA MESA

CORONADO NATIONAL
CITY

IMPERIAL
BEACH
LEMON
GROVE
SOLANA
BEACH

DEL MAR
SAN
DIEGO

CAMP PENDLETON
Lake
San Marcos
Lake
Hodges
Lake Wohlford
Lake Ramona
Lake Poway
Miramar Reservoir
San Vicente
Reservoir
Lake
Murray
Sweetwater
Reservoir
Lake
Jennings
Otay
Reservoir
Pacific
Ocean
SanDiegoBay
Santee
Lakes
Sutherland
Reservoir
Lake Henshaw
El Capitan Reservoir
Loveland Reservoir
Vail Lake
O'Neill Lake
Barrett Lake

TIJUANA

UNITED STATES
MEXICO

DULZURA
JULIAN
RAMONA
WARNER

SPRINGS

RIVERSIDE
COUNTY
ORANGE
COUNTY

SAN DIEGO
COUNTY
!
Project Site
ALPINE
LA
JOLLA
?¹

FALLBROOK
Figure 1
Regional Location
I:\PROJECTS\C\CarlsbadMunicipalWD_01174\00005_CMWDTerramar\005_TerramarSewerWaterMainImpCEQA\Map\Addendum\Terramar\Fig1_Regional.mxd 01174.00005.005 11/22/2022 - DY Source: Base Map Layers (SanGIS, 2016)
K
Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 0 8 Miles
Avenida
Encinas
Carlsbad Boulevard Water
Improvements at Terramar
CarlsbadBlvd
Palomar Airport Rd
Cannon Rd
§¨¦5
Figure 2
Project Location
I:\PROJECTS\C\CarlsbadMunicipalWD_01174\00005_CMWDTerramar\005_TerramarSewerWaterMainImpCEQA\Map\Addendum\Terramar\Fig2_ProjectLocs.mxd 01174.00005.005 1/23/2023 -DY Source: Aerial (Maxar, 2021)
K
Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 0 750 Feet
Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar (2019 Master Plan No. W-15) Proposed addition to W-15
Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 3 from Tierra Del Oro south to approximately 300 feet south of Manzano Drive. It also includes a one- quarter mile area along Cannon Road from Carlsbad Boulevard east across the railroad tracks to Avenida Encinas.

The majority of the Project is included as CIP project W-15 (50481) from the 2019 Addendum. However, the approximately 300-foot length of the Project that is north of Cannon Road, extending to Tierra Del Oro Street, was not included. The additional 300 feet of pipeline is proposed as part of the Project and is analyzed in this addendum as a modification to CIP project W-15.

More specifically, the proposed scope of work includes the replacement of existing water mains with approximately 5,000 LF of new 12-inch pipe along Carlsbad Boulevard and Cannon Road, and abandonment via slurry filling and/or removal of approximately 7,600 LF of two existing 6-inch AC water mains and segments of existing 10-inch and 12-inch AC water mains. Roughly 1,400 LF of existing 10- inch and 12-inch mains would be removed, and 6,200 LF of existing 6-inch to 10-inch would be abandoned. The Project proposes to construct one single pipeline that would replace two existing pipelines currently on each side of the roadway along Carlsbad Boulevard. The new 12-inch water main would include all associated appurtenances (gate valves, air release valves, and blow offs) and would be connected back to the existing water system at the project limits along Carlsbad Boulevard, as well as at the street intersections within limits of the work (Tierra Del Oro, Shore Drive, Cerezo Drive and Manzano Drive). The 10-inch and 12-inch AC main in Cannon Road would be replaced with new 12-inch polyvinyl chloride pipe, from Carlsbad Boulevard across the railroad tracks to Avenida Encinas.

The Project also includes trenchless rehabilitation and open trench sewer main and manhole replacements, approximately 1,500 LF of existing 6-inch, 8-inch and 10-inch diameter vitrified clay pipe.

Roughly 800 LF of existing 10-inch sewer would be rehabilitated, and 700 LF of new 8-inch would replace 700 LF of existing 6-inch sewer. The existing waterline and sewer replacement would be within the existing roadway right-of-way. The Project would also include trench resurfacing of the existing street.

Potable water utility improvements would involve open trenching to a depth of approximately 5 feet.

Proposed sewer utility improvements would involve open trenching to a depth up to approximately 10 to 15 feet. Trenches are typically 3 to 5 feet wide and would use trench shoring as required, in accordance with the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards.

Trenchless rehabilitation of the sewer facilities would be used for a portion of the existing sewer mains, with equipment and materials installed via existing manholes. Other standard construction equipment would be used including a sawcut machine, vacuum excavator, backhoe, loader, end dump, concrete pumper truck, sweeper, backfill tamper, pneumatic tools, signage/traffic cones and traffic control, a generator, bypass sewer pump and work crew vehicles. Other equipment would be used as necessary.

The Project is part of the City’s CIP to maintain, rehabilitate, improve, or replace water and sewer infrastructure as identified by condition assessments, engineering studies or feedback from maintenance and operations. The existing water and sewer mains are at the end of their service life.

Construction of the project would improve maintenance requirements, improve system reliability and accessibility, and bring the water and sewer main systems up to current design standards. The water and sewer improvements for this project involve negligible or no expansion of use.

Construction best management practices (BMPs) would be used during the construction of the project, in accordance with applicable storm water pollution prevention requirements, and to control temporary potential dust, debris, site cleanliness, proper removal/disposal of asbestos cement pipe, staging, and Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 4 other construction related items and materials. The Project would comply with the requirements described in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and a traffic control plan would be prepared and implemented in accordance with the CA Department of Transportation Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones.

A portion of the Project improvements fall within the area of Deferred Certification of the Local Coastal Program. The Coastal Commission is required to issue the Coastal Development Permit for the Project improvements starting on Tierra Del Sol and ending to the south on Cannon Road. The Project improvements on Cannon Road, from Carlsbad Boulevard east to Avenida Encinas, are also under the Coastal Commission’s permitting authority. The Coastal Commission has appeal jurisdiction for the improvements from the Cannon Road/Carlsbad Boulevard intersection south 210 feet to Shore Drive and from the southernmost Carlsbad Boulevard/Shore Drive intersection south to the southern end of the Project boundary.

2.3 Construction Methods
Construction of the Project is scheduled to begin between late 2023 and late 2024. Construction would involve open trench methods, utilizing typical construction equipment such as dozers, rollers, dewatering pumps, backhoes, loaders, delivery, and haul trucks. The Project would take approximately 8 to 10 months to construct and would require approximately 15-20 construction workers on site per day.

Construction activity would be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Saturday, excluding Sundays and holidays per the requirements of Section 8.48.010 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.

While the construction staging area is not known at this time, the Project will be designed such that staging areas are either within the Project boundary or, if outside of the Project boundary, within disturbed or developed areas. No staging areas shall occur within sensitive biological habitat. The construction contractor will submit construction planning documents to the city for approval prior to mobilization and staging of equipment outside of the Project boundaries.

As the Project would be constructed within a public roadway, the following measures would be adhered to during construction:
• Public access to the beach west of the Project site will be maintained at all times during construction;
• Equipment and materials will be staged outside of Carlsbad Boulevard and Cannon Road; • Temporary steel plates will be installed during non-working hours; • Equipment and materials will be demobilized and cleaned up from the Project site after work hours each day;
• Trench excavation will be limited to the quantity of pipe to be installed during each workday; and
• Major construction activities will avoid the peak tourist season between Memorial Day and Labor Day.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 5 2.4 Regulatory Compliance
As described in PEIR Chapter 2.6.1, Regulatory Compliance, construction and operation of the CIP projects would be conducted in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Updates to the original description are provided based on changes in existing conditions described in the PEIR.

Since the certification of the PEIR, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges from the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems Draining the Watersheds within the San Diego Region (Order No. R9-2013-0001, NPDES No.

CAS0109266) were amended. The updated permit requires projects not falling within the triggering coverage thresholds of the General Permit to comply with the implementing ordinances of the county and cities bound by the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems permit in which the improvements are located.

2.5 Project Design Features
As part of the PEIR and 2019 Addendum, CMWD incorporates several project design features and construction measures into the Project design in an effort to reduce the potential for adverse environmental effects. These features are incorporated by reference from Chapter 2.6.2, Project Design Features, of the PEIR. The Project design features are also provided in the MMRP.

3.0 Environmental Setting
This section incorporates by reference Chapter 3, Environmental Setting, from the PEIR, the 2019 Addendum and the 2022 Addendum, as applicable.

This section focuses on the Water Service and Master Plan, as the proposed Project improvements are related to potable water service.

3.1 Existing Water Service and Master Plan (including 2019 Addendum)
Originally, the Water Master Plan was approved in 1990 with recommendations and revisions prepared in 1997 and adopted with the 2003 update. The 2003 Water Master Plan Update evaluated the CMWD water distribution system and its ability to meet project demands. Since the Master Plan Update in 1997, a substantial number of residential, commercial, and industrial developments had been constructed and future development had been identified in the 2001 Growth Management Database.

The 2003 document presented an update of CMWD’s Water Master Plan for the planning period between 2001 and buildout of the CMWD’s service area, which was anticipated to occur by 2020.

CMWD reviewed all infrastructures within the service area to identify necessary improvements to existing facilities, capacity improvements, and expansion needs.

An update to the Water Master Plan was prepared in 2012 and analyzed in the PEIR. The update included a capacity evaluation to meet future demands and recommended CIP projects for continued reliable water service through buildout in accordance with the Carlsbad Growth Management Plan.

Considering the significant projected buildout, potable water demand was anticipated to increase Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 6 8 percent from 19.1 million gallon per day (mgd) (21,392 afy) in 2007 to 20.8 mgd (23,296 afy) in 2035.

Between 2035 and 2050, water demand was projected to increase three percent to 21.4 mgd (23,968 afy).

The Water Master Plan was again updated in 2019 based on more recent demand forecasts and hydraulic modeling. A median water demand forecast of 20,700 afy or 18.5 mgd at buildout (2040) was used as the basis for the 2109 Water Master Plan Update. This projection was lower than the 2035 forecast used in the 2012 Water Master Plan (CMWD 2012b).

Water service is provided by the CMWD, encompassing approximately 83 percent of Carlsbad. The remaining areas are serviced by the Olivenhain Municipal Water District in the southern portion and Vallecitos Water District in the eastern portion of the city. The CMWD receives 100 percent of its potable water supply from the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA), delivering water through 450 miles of pipeline, 71 pressure regulating stations, five pump stations, eight storage tanks, and one earthen dam reservoir. The total operational storage for CMWD is 244 million gallons, which includes the 195-million-gallon Maerkle Reservoir.

3.2 Local and Regional Planning Context
This section incorporates by reference Chapter 3.3, Local and Regional Planning Context, from the 2012 PEIR and 2019 Addendum, and Chapter 3.2, Local and Regional Planning Context, from the 2022 Addendum.

I. City of Carlsbad General Plan (2015a)
The Carlsbad General Plan contains nine elements, with each element containing maps and figures, policy statements, over-arching goals, specific objectives, implementing programs, and in some instances, development standards. The Land Use and Community Design Element emphasizes the Growth Management Plan requiring that adequate public facilities are provided concurrent with new growth, specifically identifying performance standards for 11 public facilities: city administration, library, wastewater treatment, parks, drainage, circulation, fire, open space, schools, sewer collection, and water distribution. The Sustainability Element encourages conservation and reduced reliance on imported water.

II. City of Carlsbad CAP
The City of Carlsbad has developed a Climate Action Plan (CAP) to help the city meet state goals for reducing greenhouse gases and the community’s goal of promoting a sustainable environment. The CAP serves as a long-range strategy to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, which include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and water vapor. The CAP sets a baseline for past and current emissions, forecasts future emissions, and establishes targets to reduce the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from water utilities (including water supply, wastewater, and recycled water) conveyance, treatment, and distribution by 8 percent by 2035.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 7 4.0 Environmental Analysis Checklist

4.1 Environmental Analysis Checklist Summary
The following Environmental Analysis Checklist (Checklist) (Table 4-1) was developed for projects with previously certified/approved environmental documents. This Checklist takes into consideration the preparation of an environmental document prepared at an earlier stage of a project (e.g., the PEIR for the Sewer, Water and Recycled Water Master Plans, certified in 2012, and the 2019 Addendum for the Master Plans updates1), evaluates the adequacy of the earlier document in assessing potential environmental impacts resulting from the Project, and is consistent with Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. The results of this evaluation are summarized below with the detailed analysis provided in subsequent sections, including updated impact determinations.2
Table 4-1

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CHECKLIST SUMMARY
Environmental
Issue Area
Was Impact
Analyzed in
Prior
Environmental
Document(s)?
Do Master
Plan Updates
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring
New Analysis
or
Verification?

1. Aesthetics (Section 4.2.I) Yes No No No

2. Agriculture and Forestry
Resources (Section 4.2.II)
Yes No No No

3. Air Quality (Section 4.2.III) Yes No No No

4. Biological Resources
(Section 4.2.IV)
Yes No No No

5. Cultural Resources
(Section 4.2.V)
Yes No No No

6. Energy (Section 4.2.VI) Yes No No No

7. Geology/Soils (Section 4.2.VII) Yes No No No

8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
(Section 4.2.VIII)
Yes No No No

9. Hazards and Hazardous
Materials (Section 4.2.IX)
Yes No No No

10. Hydrology and Water Quality
(Section 4.2.X )
Yes No No No

11. Land Use and Planning
(Section 4.2.XI)
Yes No No No

1 The 2022 Addendum specifically analyzed two other CIP projects and does not provide analysis of the currently proposed modifications; therefore, it is not specifically addressed in the following analysis. 2 This checklist uses terminology recommended in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. In instances where the city has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. A No Impact answer is used in instances where the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one proposed or the resource in question is absent.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 8 Environmental
Issue Area
Was Impact
Analyzed in
Prior
Environmental
Document(s)?
Do Master
Plan Updates
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring
New Analysis
or
Verification?

12. Mineral Resources
(Section 4.2.XII)
Yes No No No

13. Noise (Section XIII) Yes No No No

14. Population and Housing
(Section 4.2.XIV)
Yes No No No

15. Public Services (Section 4.2.XV) Yes No No No

16. Recreation (Section 4.2.XVI) Yes No No No

17. Transportation/Traffic
(Section 4.2.XVII)
Yes No No No

18. Tribal Cultural Resources
(Section 4.2.XVIII)
Yes No No No

19. Utilities and Service Systems
(Section 4.2.XIX)
Yes No No No

20. Wildfire (Section 4.2.XX) Yes No No No

21. Mandatory Findings
(Section 4.2.XXI)
Yes No No No
Note: See checklist sections 4.2.I through 4.2.XXI for detailed discussions of each environmental issue area.

4.2 Individual Issue Areas
I. Aesthetics

Was Impact
Analyzed in
Prior
Environmental
Document(s)?
Does Project
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Except as provided in Public Resources Code
Section 21099, would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista? Yes No No No
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
Yes No No No
Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 9 Was Impact
Analyzed in
Prior
Environmental
Document(s)?
Does Project
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those
that are experienced from publicly
accessible vantage point). If the project is
in an urbanized area, would the project
conflict with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
Yes No No No
d) Create a new source of substantial light
or glare which would adversely affect day
or nighttime views in the area?
Yes No No No

a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? The potential impacts of the proposed Project on scenic vistas were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.1) and 2019 Addendum. Impacts to scenic vistas could occur from construction activities, including disturbance of ground cover, grading, excavation, trenching, material stockpiles, and the presence of construction equipment. The proposed Project improvements would be contained to the public road right-of-way and located underground, resulting in minimal impacts to scenic vistas.

The proposed Project improvements, including the pipeline extension north of Cannon Road, would be contained in generally urbanized landscapes and public rights-of-way and would not have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more substantial impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum and there would be no new impacts. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
The potential impacts of the proposed Project on scenic highways were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.1) and 2019 Addendum. There are no designated State Scenic highways in Carlsbad; therefore, no impacts related to scenic highways would occur (Caltrans 2019). However, Interstate 5 is an eligible State Scenic highway and Carlsbad has its own scenic roadways program. Additionally, local scenic roadways are recognized by Carlsbad’s General Plan (2015a) including El Camino Real, Carlsbad Boulevard, Palomar Airport Road, La Costa Avenue, Melrose Drive, College Boulevard, Cannon Road, Carlsbad Village Drive, Faraday Avenue, Interstate 5, La Costa Avenue, Olivenhain Road/Rancho Santa Fe Road, and Poinsettia Lane/Carrillo Way, Adams Street/Park Drive, Batiquitos Drive, and Jefferson Street (the portion adjacent to the Buena Vista Lagoon). The Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railroad line is also considered a scenic corridor.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 10 The Project would include construction activities along Cannon Road and Carlsbad Boulevard, which are local scenic roadways. Impacts to scenic roadways could occur from short-term construction activities, including disturbance of ground cover, grading, excavation, trenching, material stockpiles, and the presence of construction equipment. As incorporated in the PEIR, the Project would be required to follow project design features, including the following:
• Demolition debris will be removed in a timely manner for off-site disposal; • Tree and vegetation removal will be limited to those depicted on construction drawings; and • Disturbed areas will be restored following construction consistent with original site conditions and surrounding vegetation. If removed vegetation included invasive plant species, the restored area shall be revegetated with a mix of native, non-invasive plants that are compatible with the surrounding setting.

Implementation of these project design features and compliance with federal, state, and local requirements and regulations would limit impacts to a less than significant level. The proposed Project improvements would be contained in an urbanized landscape and beneath public rights-of-way and would not have a substantial adverse effect on scenic highways. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more substantial impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum and there would be no new impacts. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? The potential impacts of the proposed Project on the existing visual character of the city landscape were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.1) and 2019 Addendum. Impacts to scenic vistas could occur from construction activities, including disturbance of ground cover, grading, excavation, trenching, material stockpiles, and the presence of construction equipment.

Pipeline improvements are below-ground installations. Following construction, there would be no substantial change to scenic vistas from existing conditions.

The proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on the existing visual character of the city. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more substantial impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum and there would be no new impacts. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
The potential glare and nighttime lighting impacts of the proposed Project were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.1) and 2019 Addendum. The proposed Project involves pipeline improvements and does not include any new lighting sources. The proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 11 existing sources of daytime glare or nighttime lighting. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the proposed Project modifications would result in more substantial impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum and there would be no new impacts. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.

II. Agriculture and Forestry Resources

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 12 a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
The potential impacts of the proposed Project to important farmlands are analyzed in the PEIR (Section 5.1) and 2019 Addendum. As provided, there are only a limited number of areas within Carlsbad that include important farmlands as defined by the California Department of Conservation with the city consisting mainly of Urban and Built-Up Land along the western, southern, and northwestern portions of the city, with large areas of “Other Land” interspersed throughout the eastern and central portions.

The proposed improvements would be contained in an urbanized landscape and public rights-of-way and would not have a substantial adverse effect on the remaining agricultural areas within the city. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more substantial impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum and there would be no new impacts. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? One small Williamson Act contract area is located within Carlsbad, east of Interstate 5 at Palomar Airport Road (City 2015a). This property would be unaffected by the Project and therefore the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project modifications.
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? As described in Section 5.1 of the PEIR, the city’s service area does not include any forest land or timberland zoned for timberland production. This circumstance remains unchanged, and no new or more substantial impacts would result under the proposed Project modifications. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? As described under c), the Project would result in no impacts to forest land or timberland production. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
As described under a) and c), the proposed Project would result in no impacts to agricultural resources, forest land, or timberland production.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 13 III. Air Quality

a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of the applicable air quality plan? Yes No No No
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal
or state ambient air quality standard?
Yes No No No
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations? Yes No No No
d) Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
Yes No No No

a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Section 4.2 of the PEIR determined that the Master Plans would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the Regional Air Quality Strategy or State Implementation Plan and a less than significant impact would occur.

The existing regulatory framework governing air quality planning in the city has not substantially changed since the certification of the PEIR. The San Diego Air Basin continues to be in attainment for carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), lead, and sulfur dioxide (SO2), attainment/unclassifiable for (PM2.5) and (PM10), and non-attainment for ozone (8-hour) with respect to federal air quality standards. With respect to state air quality standards, the San Diego Air Basin continues to be in attainment for CO, NO2, lead, SO2, and non-attainment for ozone, PM2.5 and PM10. The Project would not result in population growth that would exceed the population projections accounted for in the Regional Air Quality Strategy and State Implementation Plan. Furthermore, the construction and operational characteristics as described in Section 4.2 have not substantially changed since the certification of the PEIR. No substantial new information has been presented that shows more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum and there would be no new significant impacts.

The conclusion of less than significant, as identified in the PEIR, remains accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 14 As provided in Section 4.2 of the PEIR, construction of the CIP projects proposed under the Master Plans would result in temporary increases in air pollutant emissions. Impacts related to the Project would be consistent with those presented in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum, as proposed construction methods, including excavation, were assessed. Emissions would be generated in the form of fugitive dust emissions (PM10 and PM2.5) and ozone precursor emissions (NOx, volatile organic compounds).

Operation of heavy equipment and vehicles during the construction phase would generate exhaust emissions from fuel combustion. Fugitive dust emissions would be generated from earth disturbance during site grading and structure demolition, as well as from construction vehicles operating on vacant areas or dirt roadways within or adjacent to CIP construction sites. The city has committed to implementing BMPs, identified as project design features in the MMRP, to reduce fugitive dust emissions and other criteria pollutant emissions during construction of CIP projects.

The PEIR contemplated the construction of the Master Plan(s) CIP projects would take place over an approximately 23-year period between 2012 and 2035. The PEIR estimated the construction emissions for the overall Master Plan Updates using worst-case assumptions, which considered simultaneous construction of multiple projects covered under the Master Plans. The construction of the 300-foot longer Project alignment would be contained within the conservative scenario described in Section 4.2.3.2 of the PEIR. Based on the fact that emissions calculated at the programmatic level for the Master Plans were determined to be less than significant, it is reasonable to conclude that construction emissions for the proposed Project modifications would not exceed San Diego Air Pollution Control District’s significance thresholds and therefore would be less than significant. For this reason, no substantial new information has been presented that shows more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum and there would be no new significant impacts. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? The potential impacts associated with a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.2) and 2019 Addendum. The city has committed to implementing BMPs, identified as project design features in the MMRP, to reduce fugitive dust emissions and other criteria pollutant emissions during construction of the Project. With the implementation of BMPs contained in the MMRP, the PEIR determined that the Master Plans would result in a less than significant impact.

Further, the Project would provide upgraded pipelines, which would be passive following construction and would not result in new sources of criteria pollutants. During facility operation, occasional vehicle trips may be required for repair or inspection and periodic maintenance. The PEIR and 2019 Addendum determined operational air pollutant emission impacts associated with the proposed CIP projects would be less than significant.

The existing air quality conditions, including the local air basin’s attainment status, have not substantially changed since the certification of the PEIR. Furthermore, the construction and operational activities associated with the Project have not changed substantially from those certified in the PEIR. No substantial new information has been presented that shows more significant impacts would result under the proposed Project modifications than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum and Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 15 there would be no new significant impacts. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project. c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? The potential impacts associated with exposure of sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.2) and 2019 Addendum. The PEIR determined that the CIP projects covered under the Master Plans would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and a less than significant impact would occur.

The potential for substantial pollutant generation due to construction of the Project has not changed since the certification of the PEIR. Once installed, the Project components would not generate substantial pollutant concentrations. The construction and operational characteristics of the Project have not changed substantially compared to the activities included in the PEIR. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum and there would be no new significant impacts. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
The potential impacts associated with odors were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.2) and 2019 Addendum. The PEIR determined that the Master Plans would not create objectionable odors and a less than significant impact would occur.

The construction and operational characteristics of the proposed Project have not changed substantially since the certification of the PEIR. The proposed Project pipeline improvements, once installed, would be underground and would not result in emissions such as odors. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum and there would be no new impacts. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 16 IV. Biological Resources

Was Impact
Analyzed in
Prior
Environmental
Document(s)?
Does Project
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications,
on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations,
or by the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
Yes No No No
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and
Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
Yes No No No
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
state or federally protected wetlands
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption,
or other means?
Yes No No No
d) Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
Yes No No No
e) Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
Yes No No No
f) Conflict with the provisions of an
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation Plan, or
other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
Yes No No No

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 17 a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Section 4.3, Biological Resources, of the PEIR provides a programmatic evaluation of potential impacts, either directly or through habitat modifications, on plant and wildlife species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Appendix B of the PEIR includes a tabular listing of the special status species considered in 2012. An updated species list was requested from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 2019 to confirm current listings and was included in Appendix B of the 2019 Addendum. Tables 4.3-3 and 4.3-4 in the PEIR identify projects that would occur within Carlsbad and be subject to the conditions of Carlsbad’s Habitat Management Plan (HMP) and associated species avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation requirements. The Carlsbad HMP was in part developed to set aside land in preservation to use as mitigation for future projects.

Based on the programmatic evaluation, the special status species with potential to be impacted by CIP projects within Carlsbad are all likely to be covered species or narrow endemic species under the Carlsbad HMP. Species not covered under the Carlsbad HMP are not likely to occur within the CIP project sites. Therefore, species not covered under the Carlsbad HMP are not likely to be adversely affected by CIP projects. Project-level surveys and/or avoidance and minimization measures were proposed for the CIP projects listed in Table 4.3-3 to ensure that the appropriate measures are implemented to address special status species with the potential to occur, including projects that are not covered under the Carlsbad HMP per HMP Appendix B. The Project was not identified as requiring surveys or minimization measures in the PEIR.

The Project site, as modified, remains developed and Project activities are not anticipated to result in significant impacts to special status species or their habitats. While the construction staging areas are unknown at this time, they would be located within disturbed or developed areas, as described further in Section 2.3 of this Addendum, and would not result in impacts to sensitive species or habitat.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 18 The construction and operational characteristics of the proposed Project have not changed substantially since the certification of the PEIR. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum and there would be no new impacts. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
As evaluated in the programmatic analysis provided in Section 4.3 of the PEIR, the construction of the CIP projects would have the potential to result in direct impacts to riparian and wetland habitat types that could support jurisdictional waters and wetlands. Activities associated with construction of specific CIP projects (see Table 4.3-7 of the PEIR) could be subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and/or California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). However, the proposed Project site does not occur within or adjacent to jurisdictional wetlands.

The city is required to prepare and implement BMPs to minimize, control, and treat storm water runoff, fugitive dust, and other pollutants at the CIP construction sites. Implementation of these required practices would reduce potential indirect impacts during construction to a less than significant level.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 19 e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
CIP projects located within the coastal zone, including the proposed improvements associated with the Project, would be subject to the Carlsbad Local Coastal Plan and Development Standards. The city and CMWD are required to comply with the Carlsbad HMP and provisions of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Plan, including the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone Ordinance. As required, potential impacts on sensitive species and habitats would be avoided or mitigated consistent with the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone Ordinance and HMP. Implementation of the proposed Master Plans were determined not to conflict with the adopted Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone Ordinance.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 20 V. Cultural Resources

The discussion below is based on a cultural report prepared by HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. for Project, attached to this Addendum as Appendix A (HELIX 2022). a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? Section 4.4, Cultural and Paleontological Resources, of the PEIR provides a programmatic assessment of the potential impacts to historic resources based on the CIP projects outlined in the 2012 Master Plans.

The PEIR notes various existing built-environment historical resources (buildings or structures aged 45 years old or older) and numerous archaeological sites within its study area. The PEIR included a cultural resources records search to evaluate the presence of known historical and archaeological resources for areas potentially impacted by the Master Plans. One sewer project included in the 2019 Addendum would be located in proximity to a historical resource; however, the project would not result in the disturbance or alteration of the historical resource. The PEIR and 2019 Addendum concluded that the Master Plan Updates would result in less than significant impacts to historical resources.

The construction and operational characteristics of the proposed Project have not changed substantially since the certification of the PEIR. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum and there would be no new impacts. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
Section 4.4 of the PEIR provides an assessment of potential impacts of the Master Plan improvements to known and undocumented archaeological resources. Known cultural resources that may be affected by the construction of proposed CIP project sites are listed by Master Plan improvements in Tables 4.4-3 to Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 21 4.4-5 of the PEIR. Additionally, the PEIR notes a high archaeological resource sensitivity for its entire study area. A table that identifies which CIP projects would have the potential to impact each resource is available in Confidential Appendix D2. This appendix is available to qualified viewers at the City of Carlsbad, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. These resources are predominately prehistoric archaeological sites of varying sizes and occupancy duration and exhibit prehistoric material culture through midden and scatters of lithic and groundstone tools. In addition, some of the identified sites in Tables 4.4-3 to 4.4-5 are considered historical resources pursuant to CEQA because they retain the potential to yield data important to prehistory or history (Criterion 4 of the California Register of Historic Resources). The PEIR concluded that the Master Plan improvements could result in a potentially significant impact to archaeological resources in the absence of mitigation. With the incorporation of Mitigation Measure Cul-1, this impact would be reduced to a level of less than significant.

A Project-specific cultural resources report was prepared in accordance with Mitigation Measure Cul-1 due to changes in the proposed Project footprint to include the area north of Cannon Road. A records search for the Project resulted in the identification of 19 recorded cultural resources nearby, none of which would be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic Resources. Four of these resources were within or adjacent to the Project boundaries. However, the Project area has potential to contain additional buried resources within paved areas. Therefore, archaeological monitoring was recommended during activity along the alignment. San Luis Rey Band representatives agreed with this monitoring recommendation. Monitoring would be conducted in accordance with the city’s guidelines and Cul-1 such that the impact to archaeological resources would be less than significant.

Since the certification of the PEIR, the city adopted the Carlsbad Tribal, Cultural, and Paleontological Resources Guidelines (2017), which updated and replaced the city’s 1990 Cultural Resource Guidelines.

The 2017 guidelines are incorporated by reference into the 2019 Addendum MMRP to reflect the city’s established standards of performance for cultural resources investigations following the city’s General Plan Update (2015a), the adoption of Assembly Bill 52 in 2014, and the corresponding amendments to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines (as amended). With the incorporation by reference of the Carlsbad Tribal, Cultural, and Paleontological Resources Guidelines (2017), the Project would have a less than significant impact.

The construction and operational characteristics of the proposed Project have not changed substantially since the certification of the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum and there would be no new impacts. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project. c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? Section 4.4 of the PEIR documents the presence of formal cemeteries within the CMWD service area; however, the section explains that none of the CIP projects are proposed within their boundaries.

Therefore, it is not expected that construction activities at CIP sites would disturb formal cemeteries.

Sections 15064.5(d) and (e) of the CEQA Guidelines assign special importance to human remains and specifies procedures to be used when Native American remains are discovered. As provided in the PEIR, these procedures are detailed under Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097.98. The disturbance of any human remains is considered a significant impact, regardless of archaeological significance or association. Any ground disturbing activities, including grading, trenching, and excavation during Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 22 construction of the Project, would have the potential to unintentionally disturb human remains, resulting in a significant impact. Implementation of the required protocol in accordance with PRC Section 5097.98 and California State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, to be followed upon unintentional disturbance of human remains, would minimize potential impacts on human remains to a level of less than significant.

VI. Energy

a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Section 4.5, Energy, of the PEIR provides an assessment of the Master Plans effects on existing water, sanitary sewer, and recycled water facilities energy use. The PEIR concluded that the Master Plans would not generate a substantial net increase in vehicle trips based on pre-existing maintenance activities. The Project, once constructed, would not require the use of electricity, emergency generators, or any other type of fuel-consuming operating equipment. The PEIR includes standard BMPs, identified as project design features in the adopted MMRP, to minimize energy consumption during construction:
• Electrical power will be supplied from commercial power supply wherever feasible, to avoid or minimize the use of engine-driven generators; and
• Trucks and equipment will not idle for more than 15 minutes when not in service.

The city and CMWD conduct routine maintenance on all infrastructure facilities and would incorporate the proposed Project into the maintenance schedule. The PEIR noted a potential total net increase in Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 23 electricity demand of 3.96 kilowatt hour (kWh) at buildout of the sewer, water, and recycled water systems, which was approximately double existing electricity demand in 2012.

Total energy use as it relates to water, sanitary sewer, and recycled water is largely a function of the city’s water demands, which in 2012 was projected to be 20.8 mgd (23,296 afy) in 2035 and increased to

21.4 mgd (23,968 afy) at buildout. The 2019 Addendum stated that based on updates to the city’s growth, the updated projected potable water demand at buildout is 18.5 mgd (20,720 afy), comparatively lower than the previous predictions. Therefore, the projected energy demands under the Project, as provided in the 2019 Addendum, would be less than analyzed in 2012 and the impact would be less than significant.

No substantial new information has been presented that shows more significant impacts would result under the Project modifications than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum and there would be no new significant impacts. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? As provided in a), the CIP projects described in the 2019 Addendum would result in a lower water demand than considered in the PEIR. In addition, these projected estimates are consistent with the city’s General Plan Update (2015a) and policies related to energy efficiency. For these reasons, the Project modifications would not conflict with plans or policies adopted for the purposes of promoting energy efficiency, and the impact is less than significant.

VII. Geology and Soils

i. Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.

Yes No No No
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? Yes No No No
Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 24 Was Impact
Analyzed in
Prior
Environmental
Document(s)?
Does Project
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction? Yes No No No
iv. Landslides? Yes No No No
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the
loss of topsoil? Yes No No No
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that
is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
Yes No No No
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined
in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building
Code (1994), creating substantial direct
or indirect risks to life or property?
Yes No No No
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
Yes No No No
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or
unique geologic feature?
Yes No No No

a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42?
The potential impacts associated with exposure of people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving rupture of an earthquake fault were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.6, Geology and Soils) and 2019 Addendum. The PEIR determined that surface rupture as a result of seismic activity is unlikely throughout the CMWD service area and no impact would occur. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
The potential impacts associated with exposure of people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving strong seismic shaking were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.6) and 2019 Addendum.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 25 The PEIR determined that the Master Plans would not exacerbate existing hazards related to strong seismic shaking. The proposed Project would be required to comply with the city’s engineering standards and standard engineering practices. As a result, this impact would be less than significant. iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? The potential impacts associated with exposure of people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving seismic-related ground failure were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.6) and 2019 Addendum. The PEIR determined that the Master Plans would result in a less than significant impact and would not exacerbate existing hazards related to seismic-related ground failure. The Project would be required to comply with the city’s standards and standard engineering practices. iv. Landslides?
The potential impacts associated with exposure of people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving landslides were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.6) and 2019 Addendum. The PEIR determined that the Master Plans would result in a less than significant impact associated with landslides. Individual projects would be required to comply with the city’s engineering standards and grading requirements, which would minimize any hazards related to cut and fill slopes and related landslide hazards. These requirements would minimize any impacts to less than significant levels.

In summary, the modifications proposed by the Project are not of a substantially different character than the activities proposed under the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. For these reasons, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? The potential impacts associated with soil erosion were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.6) and 2019 Addendum. The PEIR determined that the Master Plans would result in a less than significant impact associated with soil erosion. The Project construction activities would be regulated under the NPDES General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activity (General Construction Permit, NPDES Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ). In addition, the city would comply with applicable grading ordinance(s) and/or erosion control requirements. Compliance with existing regulations would minimize the potential for erosion during construction such that the impact is considered less than significant.

The physical improvements proposed as part of the Project have not substantially changed from the certification of the PEIR. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. For these reasons, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 26 c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?
As described in a), the PEIR considered geologic hazards as it relates to the proposed Master Plan improvements and determined that a less than significant impact would result as it relates to hazards from unstable geologic units or soils. Project would be required to comply with city standards and standard engineering practices. Compliance with existing state and local regulations would minimize potential impacts to less than significant.

The physical geologic and soil conditions in the areas of the Project have not substantially changed since the certification of the PEIR. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. For these reasons, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? The potential impacts associated with expansive soils were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.6) and 2019 Addendum. The PEIR determined that the Master Plans would result in a less than significant impact associated with expansive soils. Projects would be required to comply with the city’s standards and standard engineering practices.

The physical improvements proposed for the Project have not substantially changed since the certification of the PEIR. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? The potential impacts associated with septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.6) and 2019 Addendum. Similar to the adopted Master Plans and 2019 Addendum, alternative wastewater disposal systems and septic tanks are not a component of the proposed Project and, therefore, no impact would result. f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Section 4.4, Cultural and Paleontological Resources, of the PEIR provided an analysis of the potential impacts of the Master Plan improvements to paleontological resources. Excavation and construction activities associated with proposed CIP projects have the potential to disturb or destroy paleontological resources depending on their location within the context of geologic formations with moderate and high paleontological sensitivity. Figure 4 and Table 1 of the city’s adopted 2017 Guidelines identify the moderate and high paleontological sensitive geologic formations within the city. The Point Loma formation, Santiago formation, and Bay Point formation are identified as high paleontological sensitivity, Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 27 and the Lusardi, Delmar, late to middle Pleistocene, late Holocene marine beach, and late Holocene paralic estuarine deposits are identified as moderate sensitivity. Implementation of Mitigation Measure Pal-1 would minimize potential impacts associated with the disturbance of paleontological resources.

Pal-1 was not identified in the 2019 Addendum as applicable to the proposed Project (W-15). The modified Project currently includes additional components that are located within the high sensitivity zone and therefore is required to implement Pal-1, unless it is demonstrated that there is a low potential for disturbance of paleontological resources. With implementation of Pal-1, impacts associated with the disturbance of paleontological resources would be less than significant.

VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions

a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
Section 4.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of the PEIR provides an analysis of the potential for the Master Plan improvements to result in the generation of GHG emissions. Since the preparation of the PEIR, the city adopted a CAP (September 2015) that outlines actions the city will undertake to achieve its proportional share of GHG reductions. The CAP identified project screening thresholds based on guidance from the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. The city determined that new development projects emitting less than 900 metric tons (MT) carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) annual GHG would not contribute considerably to cumulative climate change impacts (City 2015b). If a proposed project exceeds the CAP’s 900 MT CO2e screening threshold, the project proponent must Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 28 complete the CAP Consistency Checklist to demonstrate consistency with the CAP, or a self-developed GHG-reduction program. The city analyzed the Master Plan Updates proposed in the 2019 Addendum for GHG impacts using the CAP’s screening threshold of 900 MT of CO2e per year (City 2015b).

Construction of the Project would result in temporary emissions of GHG from the operation of construction equipment and from worker and building supply vendor vehicles. Equipment that is associated with construction activity includes dozers, rollers, dewatering pumps, backhoes, loaders, delivery, and haul trucks. The PEIR determined that the worst-case construction scenario, where all projects would be constructed simultaneously and completed in seven months, would result in GHG emissions of 959 MT CO2e. The 2012 Master Plan included the construction of 50 separate projects while the 2019 Master Plan Updates included the construction of 27 separate projects. Therefore, the GHG emissions of 959 MT CO2e included in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum is conservative for the construction of the individual proposed Project.

Projected electrical demand in the PEIR was based on projected water demand, which was updated in the 2019 Addendum based on updates to the city’s growth. The updated projected potable water demand at buildout is 18.5 mgd (20,720 afy), which would reduce the increased electrical demand to

1.0 million kWh. Using a carbon intensity factor of 630 pounds of CO2e per megawatt hour, the operational GHG associated with the 2019 Master Plan Updates was projected to be 257 MT CO2e per year.

The total annual GHG emissions from construction and operation of the 2019 Master Plan Updates was estimated at 289 MT CO2e. This is below the 900 MT of CO2e per year screening threshold established by the city. No components of the proposed Project modifications would substantially change construction or operational GHG emissions that were assumed for the Project proposed under the 2019 Addendum.

The Project pipeline improvements would not consume energy once constructed. For this reason, the impact would be less than significant.

The improvements proposed by the Project are not of a substantially different character than the activities proposed under the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
The city’s CAP is considered a qualified GHG reduction plan in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5. The Project would be consistent with Measure N of the city’s CAP: Reduce GHG Intensity of Water Utilities Supply Conveyance, Treatment, and Distribution. The Project would result in GHG emission reductions from changes in the efficiency of water utilities (including water supply, wastewater, and recycled water) conveyance, treatment, and distribution facilities within the city.

The City Council adopted Policy 71: Energy Conservation and Management, in July 2006. This Policy outlines measures to help Carlsbad reach the goals set out by the city’s Energy Conservation and Management Program, including reducing demand on the energy grid. The Project would assist the city to reduce demand on the energy grid from the changes in the efficiency of water utilities conveyance, treatment, and distribution facilities within the city.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 29 As provided in a) and in this response, the Project is consistent with the CAP because it would not exceed the 900 MT of CO2e per year screening threshold established by the city and would result in GHG emission reductions. This response also demonstrates consistency with City Council Policy 71 due to changes in efficiency of water utilities.

IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials

Was Impact
Analyzed in
Prior
Environmental
Document(s)?
Does Project
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
Yes No No No
b) Create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the
environment?
Yes No No No
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within
one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
Yes No No No
d) Be located on a site which is included on
a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it
create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment?
Yes No No No
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety
hazard or excessive noise for people
residing or working in the project area?
Yes No No No
f) Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
Yes No No No
Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 30 Was Impact
Analyzed in
Prior
Environmental
Document(s)?
Does Project
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
g) Expose people or structures, either
directly or indirectly, to a significant risk
of loss, injury or death involving wildland
fires?
Yes No No No

a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
The PEIR (Section 4.8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials) and 2019 Addendum provided assessments of the potential for the routine use, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials. As provided, there are multiple federal, state, and local laws and regulations, such as Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations, the Hazardous Waste Control Law, Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, and Hazardous Material Business Plans, that the Project are required to comply with by law. Therefore, impacts associated with the use, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials generated from construction and operational activities were determined to be less than significant.

These included a site-specific hazardous materials record search for the locations and type of hazardous materials for each CIP project and, if required, a site assessment. Conducting a hazardous materials database search and environmental site assessment prior to any ground-disturbing activities associated with the construction of CIP sites would identify hazardous materials that could be encountered during CIP construction activities. With these precautions, the impact was concluded to be less than significant.

The Project site was searched on the databases maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and California Department of Toxic Substances Control. One site was located near the Project site but has undertaken remedial action and no further action is required (SWRCB 2022). Impacts related to potential hazardous materials would be less than significant.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 31 The improvements proposed by the Project are not of a substantially different character than the activities proposed under the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? The PEIR (Section 4.8) and 2019 Addendum provided assessments of the CIP projects and potential for the emission of hazardous materials within a quarter mile of a school. As provided, the activities and CIP components would be operated in compliance with applicable regulations that would minimize foreseeable risks of an accident that could create a hazard to the public or environment. Therefore, implementation of the Project modifications would not result in hazardous emissions within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school and impacts would be less than significant. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
The potential impacts associated with the disturbance of listed hazardous materials sites were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.8) and 2019 Addendum. As discussed in response b), the Project site was searched for hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code 65962.5 and no potential hazards related to the Project were identified. The improvements proposed by the Project are not of a substantially different character than the activities proposed under the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? The potential impacts associated with airport safety hazards were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.8) and 2019 Addendum. The PEIR and 2019 Addendum determined that no impact would occur. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in substantially more severe impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project. f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The PEIR (Section 4.8) and 2019 Addendum evaluated issues related to emergency response and evacuation. The PEIR noted that construction activities associated with the Master Plans, particularly excavation and trenching activities associated with pipeline extensions or other improvements that are within roadway rights-of-way, may result in temporary, construction-related lane and road closures or detours. As provided in the PEIR, the city has committed to preparing a traffic control plan for applicable Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 32 CIP projects and coordinating with the cities of Oceanside, Vista, and San Marcos. With implementation of a traffic control plan, the Project would result in less than significant impacts on emergency response or evacuation plans.

As provided in the PEIR, construction and design of all CIP projects would comply with the Uniform Fire Code (Title 24 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 9), which requires installation of sprinkler systems, fire- resistant building materials, standard roadway access widths, and other features to ensure that all above-ground structures are constructed with all reasonable fire safety features. Additionally, the city has committed to the multiple design features to minimize impacts related to wildfire:
• Fire safety information will be disseminated to construction crews during regular safety meetings. Fire management techniques will be applied during project construction as deemed necessary by the lead agency and depending on-site vegetation and vegetation of surrounding areas.
• A brush management plan will be incorporated during project construction by the city, CMWD, or a contractor, as necessary. Construction within areas of dense foliage during dry conditions will be avoided, when feasible.
• In cases where avoidance is not feasible, necessary brush fire prevention and management practices will be incorporated. Specifics of the brush management program will be determined as site plans for the project are finalized.

Preparation of a brush management plan and dissemination of fire safety information to construction crews would minimize hazards to a level of less than significant. As such, the Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 33 X. Hydrology and Water Quality

i. Result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site? Yes No No No
ii. Substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a
manner which would result in
flooding on- or off- site?
Yes No No No
iii. Create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional resources of
polluted runoff?
Yes No No No
iv. Impede or redirect flood flows? Yes No No No
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
Yes No No No
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of a water quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater management
plan?
Yes No No No

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 34 a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
The PEIR (Section 4.9, Hydrology and Water Quality) and 2019 Addendum provide assessments of the potential for impacts associated with the Master Plan improvements to result in a violation of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. During construction, there is potential for sediment and other construction-related contaminants to enter waterways from runoff. The PEIR determined that the Master Plans would result in a less than significant water quality impact based on the pre-existing NPDES and local grading and erosion ordinance requirements.

The improvements proposed by the Project are not of a substantially different character than the activities proposed under the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? The potential impacts associated with depletion of groundwater supplies were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.9) and 2019 Addendum. Construction activities associated with the Master Plans may require temporary dewatering. The proposed Project would not involve any groundwater extraction. The PEIR determined that the Master Plans would result in a less than significant impact associated with depletion of groundwater supplies. This circumstance remains unchanged under the Project modifications based on the overall reduction in water demands.

The construction and operational characteristics of the Project have not substantially changed since the certification of the PEIR. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:

The potential for impacts associated with the CIP improvements to result in alteration of existing drainage patterns and flood hazards were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.9) and 2019 Addendum The PEIR determined that the Master Plan improvements would result in less than significant impacts to existing drainage patterns and flood hazards with conformance to existing NPDES and local grading and erosion control requirements.
i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? As provided in a), the improvements covered under the Project would be subject to NPDES and local grading and erosion control requirements. As a result, the Project modifications would not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 35 ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off- site?
As noted above, the Project would be subject to NPDES and local grading and erosion control requirements. As a result, the Project modifications would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site. iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional resources of polluted runoff? The Project modifications may result in minor additions to impervious surfaces; however, these additions would not be of a scale that could create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff.
iv. Impede or redirect flood flows?
No changes in channel structures are proposed that could impede or redirect flood flows. Alterations to impervious surfaces would not be of an extent that could impede or redirect flood flows. d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? The potential impacts associated with inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.9) and 2019 Addendum. The improvements proposed by the Project modifications are not of a substantially different character than the activities proposed under the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project. e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
See responses to a) and b). As provided, the Project would result in less than significant impacts.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 36 XI. Land Use and Planning

a) Physically divide an established community?
Section 4.10, Land Use and Planning, of the PEIR provides an assessment of the Master Plan’s potential to result in the division of established communities. The PEIR and 2019 Addendum determined that the CIP projects, including the Project as initially proposed, would not divide an established community. The Project would be constructed on existing public road right-of-way. Land use conditions would remain unchanged with the proposed Project. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
b) Cause significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? As discussed in Section 4.10 of the PEIR, the Master Plans’ CIPs are designed to provide Carlsbad with plans for the development of water utilities to meet the present and future needs of the projected growth and land uses within each service area. Implementation of the Master Plans would not induce any unplanned growth that would be inconsistent with the city’s General Plan, which was formally updated in 2015, or its Growth Management Plan. Future projects would be required to comply with all applicable land use regulations in order to obtain project approval and would be further evaluated at the time of project design and review.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 37 XII. Mineral Resources

a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
Section 5.1, Effects Found Not Significant, of the PEIR includes the topic of Mineral Resources. As provided, impacts to mineral resources were determined to have no impact because the improvements were driven by new growth and ongoing condition assessment of existing infrastructure. The modifications proposed by the Project are not of a substantially different character than the activities proposed under the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? See response a). No impact would result from the Project.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 38 XIII. Noise

a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Section 4.11, Noise, of the PEIR provides an assessment of the potential impacts to noise sensitive land uses resulting from the construction and long-term operation of the Master Plan improvements. As noted in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum, maintenance trips would be spread across all facilities, including the Project, and would not be concentrated on a specific roadway. Due to the minimal number and geographic distribution of vehicular trips associated with the maintenance of the CIP projects overall, transportation noise increases would be negligible. Under the Project modifications, these circumstances would remain unchanged and would result in less than significant permanent increases in ambient noise associated with transportation noise sources.

The city has committed to ensuring that operating equipment will be designed to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. The Project would not generate operational noise once installed and would not result in a substantial increase in ambient noise levels.

According to the PEIR and 2019 Addendum, construction of the CIP projects would result in temporary increases in ambient noise levels. Construction activities associated with the Project would involve the use of heavy equipment during trenching and installation of equipment. The magnitude of the impact would depend on the type of construction activity, type of construction equipment, duration of the Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 39 construction phase, distance between the noise source and receiver, and any intervening topography.

As provided, sound levels of typical construction equipment range from 60 decibels to 90 decibels at 50 feet from the source (USDOT 2008).

The PEIR included construction BMPs, identified as project design features in the MMRP, to minimize noise effects to surrounding neighborhoods. These measures are included in the city’s MMRP. The construction activities proposed by the Project modifications are not of a substantially different character than the activities proposed under the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? The PEIR (Section 4.11, Noise) and 2019 Addendum provide assessments of the potential vibration impacts to sensitive land uses resulting from the construction and long-term operation of the CIP improvements. Vibration sources associated with implementation of the Project would be generated primarily from construction. Once installed, the Project would include passive uses that do not generate substantial levels of vibration.

As provided in the PEIR, construction-related vibration would have the potential to impact nearby structures and vibration-sensitive equipment and operations. The level of vibration generated from construction activities would depend on multiple factors including soil type, distance, and the energy- generating capability of the construction equipment. The PEIR’s MMRP included measures for construction to minimize vibration effects to surrounding neighborhoods. The construction activities proposed by the Project modifications are not of a substantially different character than the activities proposed under the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The Project would be located within the McClellan-Palomar Airport Influence Area but not in the identified airport noise contours. The Project improvements would be contained underground once constructed and do not involve any features for human occupancy that would result in regular exposure to aircraft noise from McClellan-Palomar Airport. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 40 XIV. Population and Housing

a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
Section 5.1, Effects Found Not Significant, of the PEIR includes a discussion of population and housing.

As provided in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum, the Project relies on population projections published in the Carlsbad Growth Management Plan and Growth Database, San Diego Association of Governments population projections, and the master plans from neighboring agencies. Therefore, the Project would not generate additional population or cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections. These circumstances remain unchanged based on the reduced water demand projections for the Project included under the 2019 Addendum when compared to the 2012 PEIR.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 41 XV. Public Services

a) Fire protection? Yes No No No
b) Police protection? Yes No No No
c) Schools? Yes No No No
d) Parks? Yes No No No
e) Other public facilities? Yes No No No

a) Fire protection?
Section 5.1, Effects Found Not Significant, of the PEIR includes a discussion of the potential impacts of the Master Plans to public services, including fire protection. As provided in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum, the proposed Project does not contain any residential uses or any other land uses that would result in an increased demand for public services. Additionally, the Project would not exceed official regional or local population projections. Similar to the adopted Master Plans and Master Plans Updates, the size, capacity, and location of all Project facilities would be based on the population and land use analysis based on forecasted growth identified in the Carlsbad General Plan (2015a), and systems would be sized appropriately to serve projected service populations. For these reasons, no impacts to public services, including fire protection services, would result.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 42 c) Schools?
See response a). No impact would result to schools or educational services. d) Parks?
See response a). No impact would result to parks or recreational facilities. e) Other public facilities?
See response a). No impact would result to other public facilities, such as libraries.

XVI. Recreation

a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Section 5.1, Effects Found Not Significant, of the PEIR includes a discussion of the potential impacts of the Master Plans to recreation. As provided in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum, the approved CIP projects do not include any proposed residential uses or new recreational facilities or parks and their implementation would not impact the use of parks or other recreational facilities and would not require the construction or expansion of new such facilities. For this reason, the PEIR and 2019 Addendum concluded that no impact would result.

XVII. Transportation

a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
Section 4.12, Transportation/Traffic, of the PEIR provides an analysis of the proposed improvements covered under the adopted Master Plans. As described in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum, the construction of the improvements would generate construction-related trips. However, construction traffic would only affect a limited area of the city in which they were located for a short time during construction of a particular project. The PEIR and 2019 Addendum determined that impacts related to temporary construction traffic would be less than significant with the incorporation of a traffic control plan during construction. Implementation of a traffic control plan is identified as a project design feature in the MMRP. Operation of the infrastructure improvements would not include substantial traffic generating uses beyond existing maintenance conditions.

Due to the low volume of traffic generated by the proposed Project improvements (e.g., temporary construction-related trips, periodic inspections, and maintenance), the improvements would not Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 44 degrade the traffic level of service in the vicinity or conflict with any applicable plans establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of a circulation system.

The modifications proposed by the Project are not of a substantially different character than the activities proposed under the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? The Project modifications would not include new traffic generating uses that would increase vehicle trips beyond existing conditions. The PEIR and 2019 Addendum determined that the improvements would not conflict with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) and no impact would occur. c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? The potential impacts associated with hazards due to a design feature were analyzed in the PEIR (Section 4.12) and 2019 Addendum. The PEIR and 2019 Addendum determined that impacts related to temporary traffic related hazards and local driveway access were less than significant with the incorporation of traffic control planning during construction. Implementation of a traffic control plan is identified as a project design feature in the adopted MMRP. The modifications proposed by the Project are not of a substantially different character than the activities proposed under the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. The conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project. d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Section 4.8 of the PEIR evaluated issues related to emergency response and evacuation. The PEIR and 2019 Addendum noted that construction activities associated with the CIP projects, particularly excavation and trenching activities associated with pipeline extensions or other improvements that are within roadway rights-of-way, may result in temporary, construction-related lane and road closures or detours. The Project would include construction in the roadway right-of-way and would require temporary closure of traffic lanes. As provided in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum, the city has committed to preparing a traffic control plan for applicable CIP projects. Implementation of a traffic control plan is identified as a project design feature in the MMRP. With implementation of a traffic control plan, the Project would result in less than significant impacts on emergency response or evacuation plans.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 45 XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources

i. Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code Section
5020.1(k), or
Yes No No No
ii. A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and
supported by substantial evidence,
to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision€ (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In
applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code Section 5024.1, the lead
agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe.

Yes No No No

a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? Section 4.4, Cultural and Paleontological Resources, of the PEIR provides an assessment of potential impacts of the Master Plan improvements to known and undocumented archaeological resources. Since Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 46 the certification of the PEIR, the city has updated its Carlsbad Tribal, Cultural, and Paleontological Resources Guidelines (2017) to reflect the city’s established standards of performance for cultural resources investigations following the city’s General Plan Update (2015a), the adoption of Assembly Bill 52 in 2014, and the corresponding amendments to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines (as amended). The city implemented several administrative updates to the PEIR’s adopted MMRP in the 2019 Addendum. These updates included updated CIP project references and the incorporation by reference of the city’s Tribal, Cultural, and Paleontological Resources Guidelines (2017).

The improvements proposed by the Project are not of a substantially different character than the activities proposed under the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe?
Since the certification of the PEIR, the city adopted the 2017 guidelines to reflect the city’s established standards of performance for cultural resources investigations following the city’s General Plan Update (2015a), the adoption of Assembly Bill 52 in 2014, and the corresponding amendments to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines (as amended).

Native American monitoring would be conducted at the Project site due to the area’s resource sensitivity. San Luis Rey Band representatives agreed with this monitoring recommendation.

Implementation of the preferred treatment options and mitigation measures, as detailed in the 2017 guidelines and 2019 Addendum, would ensure potential impacts on tribal cultural resources remain less than significant.

Sections 15064.5(d) and (e) of the CEQA Guidelines assign special importance to human remains and specifies procedures to be used when Native American remains are discovered. As provided in Section 4.4 of the PEIR, these procedures are detailed under PRC, Section 5097.98. Any ground disturbing activities associated with implementation of the Project, including grading, trenching, and excavation during construction of the Project, would have the potential to unintentionally disturb human remains, resulting in a significant impact. Implementation of the required protocol in accordance with PRC Section 5097.98 and California State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, to be followed upon unintentional disturbance of human remains, in conjunction with Standard Treatment Measures 5 and 11 from the city’s 2017 guidelines would ensure potential impacts on human remains remain less than significant.

XIX. Utilities and Service Systems

a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Section 5.1, Effects Found Not Significant, of the PEIR includes a discussion of the potential impacts of the Master Plans on existing utilities and service systems. As provided in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum, a primary purpose of the updating the Master Plans is to ensure adequate, effective, reliable, equitable and fiscally sound water, sewer, and recycled water service to current and projected future residential, commercial, and industrial customers through 2040. The Master Plans respond to projected growth in Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 48 the service areas (refer to Population and Housing above) and would distribute existing and planned water supplies to meet existing and projected demand. Implementation of the Master Plans would not directly result in the need for new or expanded water and sewer supplies by introducing people or development to an area. The environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of the proposed Project are described throughout Section 4.2 of this Addendum.

The modifications proposed by the Project are not of a substantially different character than the activities proposed under the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
As provided in the 2019 Addendum, the Master Plan Updates were projected to result in a reduction in overall water use from 2012. The city’s water demands in 2012 was projected to increase to 21.4 mgd (23,968 afy) in 2050; however, according to the 2019 Addendum, based on updates to the city’s growth plan, the updated projected potable water demand at buildout is 18.5 mgd (20,720 afy), comparatively lower than the previous prediction in the PEIR. Therefore, the projected water demands under the Master Plan Updates, in which the Project was previously considered, would be less than analyzed in 2012 and the impact would be less than significant. The extended footprint of the Project would not change the city’s water demand or supply as provided in the 2019 Addendum. c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
As provided above, no capacity increases would result under the Project that would otherwise require an increase in treatment capacity at the Encina Wastewater Treatment Control Facility. No impact would result.
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? As discussed in the PEIR (Section 4.8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials) and the 2019 Addendum, all demolition debris and construction waste associated with construction of CIP projects under the Master Plans would be properly handled and disposed of, in accordance with federal, state and local laws and regulations related to solid and hazardous waste. Moreover, the long-term operations of the proposed Project as passive infrastructure would not generate solid waste that would significantly impact the permitted capacity of area landfills.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 49 e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
See item d). This impact would be less than significant.

XX. Wildfire

a) Substantially impair an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
Yes No No No
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project occupants to,
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire
or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
Yes No No No
c) Require the installation or maintenance
of associated infrastructure (such as
roads, fuel breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines or other utilities)
that may exacerbate fire risk or that may
result in temporary or ongoing impacts
to the environment?
Yes No No No
d) Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or
downstream flooding or landslides, as a
result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
Yes No No No

a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The PEIR (Section 4.8) and 2019 Addendum included analysis of wildfire hazards and impacts to emergency response. As provided, the service areas include mostly urbanized land; however, portions of the city service areas are located in areas classified as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (CAL FIRE 2009). The Project site is not located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. As provided in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum, construction and design of all CIP projects would comply with the Uniform Fire Code (Title 24 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 9), which requires installation of sprinkler systems, fire- resistant building materials, standard roadway access widths, and other features to ensure that all Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 50 above-ground structures are constructed with all reasonable fire safety features. Additionally, the city has committed to the multiple design features to minimize impacts related to wildfire:
• Fire safety information will be disseminated to construction crews during regular safety meetings. Fire management techniques will be applied during project construction as deemed necessary by the lead agency and depending on-site vegetation and vegetation of surrounding areas.
• A brush management plan will be incorporated during project construction by the city, CMWD, or a contractor, as necessary. Construction within areas of dense foliage during dry conditions will be avoided, when feasible.
• In cases where avoidance is not feasible, necessary brush fire prevention and management practices will be incorporated. Specifics of the brush management program will be determined as site plans for the project are finalized.

As provided in issue IX (f), the city has committed to preparing a traffic control plan for applicable CIP projects. Implementation of a traffic control plan is identified as a project design feature in the MMRP.

Preparation of a brush management plan and dissemination of fire safety information to construction crews are also included as project design features in the MMRP, and would further minimize wildfire hazards for individual projects. In this context, the Project would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan and the impact would be less than significant.

The improvements proposed by the Project are not of a substantially different character than the activities proposed under the PEIR and 2019 Addendum. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project.
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
See response a). The Project would be constructed within existing urbanized areas to serve existing and approved development. The physical improvements proposed by the Project would not exacerbate existing wildfire risks that could otherwise expose existing populations to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire. The Project would result in a less than significant impact. c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? The Project would generally be constructed in existing and future dedicated public rights of way and on city-owned properties and do not include any new electrical connections in high fire hazard zones.

Preparation of a brush management plan and dissemination of fire safety information to construction crews are included as project design features in the MMRP, and would minimize wildfire hazards for individual projects. The physical improvements proposed under the Project would serve existing Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 51 development and would not exacerbate existing fire risks that could result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. This is considered a less than significant impact. d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? See responses a) and b). The Project would not exacerbate existing wildfire hazards that could otherwise result in downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire instability, or drainage changes. The Project would be required to comply with the city’s engineering standards along with Carlsbad’s grading requirements, which would minimize any hazards related to landslides Compliance with existing regulations would minimize impacts to less than significant.

XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 52 a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Sections 4.3 and 4.4 of the PEIR included consideration of potential cumulative impacts to biological and cultural resources. The 2019 Addendum identified less than significant impacts and did not contribute to more significant impacts than those identified in the PEIR. With the inclusion of the mitigation measures identified in the MMRP, the Project would result in less than significant impacts. The physical improvements proposed under the modified Project are not of a substantially different character than those certified in the PEIR. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum.

No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of past, present, and probable future projects)? Chapter 4 of the PEIR includes a consideration of potential cumulative impacts for each of the environmental resource topics considered. As provided in the 2019 Addendum, the city’s water demand in 2012 was projected to increase to 21.4 mgd (23,968 afy) at buildout; however, based on updates to the city’s growth plan, the updated projected potable water demand at buildout is 18.5 mgd (20,720 afy), comparatively lower than the previous predictions. Therefore, the projected water demands under the proposed Project would be less than analyzed in 2012.

Given that the activities proposed under the Project have not substantially changed since the certification of the PEIR, the impact continues to be less than significant following application of the required mitigation. The analysis included in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum conservatively addresses the potential impacts of the Project, since complete construction details were unknown. No substantial new information has been presented that shows the Project modifications would result in more significant impacts than those originally analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum. No new significant impacts were identified as part of this analysis. As a result, the conclusions identified in the PEIR and 2019 Addendum remain accurate and applicable to the proposed Project. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Section 5.3 and 5.4 of the PEIR address the Master Plans’ potential to result in growth inducement and significant and unavoidable impacts, respectively. Given that the Project would involve the ongoing management, replacement, and upgrade of the city’s water, sanitary sewer, and recycled water infrastructure, no substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, would result.

This impact is considered less than significant.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 53 5.0 Applicable Project-specific Mitigation Measures
The following mitigation measures from the certified 2012 PEIR MMRP and 2019 Addendum MMRP would be applicable to the impacts associated with the Project. The City’s updated 2017 Tribal, Cultural, and Paleontological Resources Guidelines were incorporated into MMRP for the 2019 Addendum to reflect updates to treatment of tribal, cultural, and paleontological resources. No new significant impacts or increased severity in impacts that were not analyzed in the PEIR or 2019 Addendum have been identified; therefore, no additional new Project-specific mitigation is required.

As identified in the associated environmental analysis sections above, mitigation measures related to cultural and paleontological resources are applicable to the proposed Project. Based on the cultural resources investigation, archaeological and Native American monitoring are recommended for the Project site.

5.1 Cultural Resources
Cul-1 Cultural Resources Investigation. For the CIP projects proposed in close proximity to a known cultural resource or projects that would result in ground-disturbing activities in a previously undisturbed area, a project-level cultural resources investigation shall be conducted by a qualified cultural resource professional as defined in the Carlsbad Tribal, Cultural, and Paleontological Resources Guidelines (2017) (2017 Guidelines) The cultural resources investigation shall include:

1. A CIP project site-specific review of the records search data at the South Coastal Information Center shall be conducted to determine if the CIP project site has been subjected to a professional survey.
a. If a current cultural resources report addressing potential impacts on cultural resources is available, the city or CMWD shall implement the mitigation measures provided within the report. In the event that a current and valid report is not available, or if the entirety of the CIP project site has not been professionally surveyed, then an updated records search shall be performed.
b. In accordance with the 2017 Guidelines, the city or CMWD shall contact the NAHC and local tribal governments for input on the project in order to identify any additional Native American resources that may not be included in the records search.

2. For those CIP project site(s) not addressed by a current cultural resources report (produced within five years of project proposal), a project-level Phase I Cultural Resources Survey shall be prepared in accordance with the 2017 Guidelines.

Updates for all resources encountered during the Phase I survey shall be recorded using Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 forms in accordance with all applicable regulations. Resources shall be evaluated for significance and eligibility for inclusion in all applicable historic registers using methods such as, but not limited to, subsurface testing and/or archival research. Any subsurface testing would be monitored by an appropriate Native American representative.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 54 3. In the event that such resources are found to be historical resources pursuant to CEQA, potential adverse impacts must be analyzed as stated in PRC Sections 21084.1 and 21083.2(l). Suitable mitigation for significant effects on archaeological resources are outlined in Section 15126.4(b)(3) as well as the 2017 Guidelines. The city or CMWD shall be responsible for implementing the methods for eliminating or substantially reducing impacts on resources as recommended by the archeologist and in consultation with the Native American Tribe. Such methods could include, but are not limited to:
a. Planning construction to avoid archaeological sites; b. Incorporation of sites within parks, greenspace, or other open space; c. Capping or covering a site with a layer of soil before building on the site; d. Deeding the site into a permanent conservation easement; e. Excavation (Data Recovery) of archaeological resources; and/or f. Construction monitoring by a qualified professional and appropriate Native American monitors as identified through consultation with the NAHC or Native American Tribe. The monitor(s) shall be present at all pre- construction meetings.

4. If, as a result of Cul 1 -3, it is determined that a CIP project site requires monitoring by a Native American Tribe, then the city or CMWD shall enter into a Pre-Excavation Agreement or Cultural Resource Treatment and Monitoring Agreement with the appropriate Native American Tribe prior to the commencement of earth disturbing activities and consistent with the 2017 Guidelines.

5. The results of the cultural resources investigation shall be complied into a technical report or memorandum and submitted to the city or CMWD and the South Coastal Information Center.

5.2 Geology and Soils
Pal-1 Paleontological Resources Investigation. For the proposed CIP projects which are located within geologic formations identified as high and moderate sensitivity in Table 1 of the 2017 Guidelines, a project-level paleontological resources investigation shall be conducted by a qualified professional paleontologist in cooperation with the County of San Diego and the San Diego Natural History Museum. The paleontological resources investigation shall include:

1. A review of the records search data for the city and CMWD service area and, if necessary, an updated records search;

2. Project-level pedestrian surveys of portions of the proposed CIP sites where paleontological resources could be encountered based on presence and depth of the sensitive formations;
Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 55 3. Formal evaluation of any potentially affected paleontological resources to determine whether they qualify as unique paleontological resources; and

4. Recommended measures to avoid, where feasible, impacts on unique paleontological resources, such as preservation in place, planning construction to avoid unique paleontological sites, placing paleontological sites into permanent conservation easements, or planning parks, green space, or other open space to incorporate paleontological sites. Where avoidance or preservation in place is not feasible, excavation and curation may be recommended as mitigation.

5. The results of the paleontological resources investigation shall be compiled into a technical report or memorandum and submitted to the city or CMWD for further coordination with the San Diego Natural History Museum, as necessary.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 56 6.0 References
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
2019 Caltrans Scenic Highway System Map.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) 2009 Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA As Recommended by CAL FIRE, Carlsbad.

June 11.

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)
2022 Geotracker, Cabrillo Power (SLT19726861). Available at:
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=SLT19726861.

Accessed March 25, 2022.

Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD)
2012 Water and Recycled Water Master Plan.

City of Carlsbad (City)
2021 City of Carlsbad Zoning Map. August.
2019 Addendum to the Program Environmental Impact Report, City of Carlsbad Sewer Master Plan and Carlsbad Municipal Water District Water and Recycled Water Master Plans Update. August.
2017 Tribal, Cultural, and Paleontological Resources Guidelines. Available at:
https://www.carlsbadca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/254/63742597651687000

0. 2015a Carlsbad General Plan Update and Program EIR, prepared by the City of Carlsbad.

Available at: https://www.carlsbadca.gov/departments/community- development/planning/general-plan.
2015b Climate Action Plan. September 2015. Prepared by Dyett and Bhatia. Available at:
https://www.carlsbadca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/4192/6374466651688000

00. 2012a City of Carlsbad Sewer Master Plan and Carlsbad Municipal Water District Water Master Plan and Recycled Water Master Plan Updates, Final Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR 12-01). State Clearinghouse No. 2012021006. October 2012, Certified by City of Carlsbad City Council on November 13, 2012, Resolution 2012-245. 2012b Carlsbad Municipal Water District Water Master Plan, November 2011; Recycled Water Master Plan, January 2012; and Phase III Recycled Water Project, Initial Study/MND (EIA 12-02), November 2012.
2004 Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad. November. 2003 City of Carlsbad Water Master Plan and Sewer Master Plan.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 57 City of Carlsbad (City) (cont.)
1998 Rancho Carrillo Master Plan. October 27.
1992 Water Reclamation Master Plan.

HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. (HELIX)
2022 Cultural Resources Study for the Carlsbad Municipal Water District Terramar Area Sewer & Water Main Improvements Project. April 22.

U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)
2008 Roadway Construction Noise Model Version 1.1. Available at:
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/construction_noise/rcnm/.

Carlsbad Boulevard Water Improvements at Terramar Project 58 7.0 Preparers
HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc.

Joanne Dramko, AICP, Project Manager
Shelby Bocks, Environmental Planner
Mandy Mathews, Biologist
Stacie Wilson, RPA, Archaeologist
Daniel Young, GIS Specialist
Ana Topete, Document Specialist

Appendix A
Cultural Resources Study—
Terramar Area Sewer & Water Main
Improvements Project

HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc.
7578 El Cajon Boulevard
La Mesa, CA 91942
619.462.1515 tel
619.462.0552 fax
www.helixepi.com

April 22, 2022 01174.00005.001

Mr. Sean Diaz, PE, QSD
Utilities Senior Engineer
Carlsbad Municipal Water District
5950 El Camino Real
Carlsbad, CA 92008-8802

Subject: Cultural Resources Study for the Carlsbad Municipal Water District Terramar Area Sewer & Water Main Improvements Project
Dear Mr. Diaz:

HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. (HELIX) was contracted to conduct a project site-specific review for the Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) Terramar Area Sewer & Water Main Improvements Project (project), located in the City of Carlsbad (City), San Diego County, California. For the project site- specific review, HELIX reviewed an existing 2016 cultural resources survey report prepared by AECOM for the City’s Terramar Coastal Improvement Project that shares the same project alignment as the project (Foglia and Wilson 2016); conducted a records search update at the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC); and requested a Sacred Lands File Search from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Neither a field survey nor Native American outreach were performed as part of the current study. In summary, no significant cultural resources will be adversely impacted by the project. However, in line with the 2016 AECOM study recommendations for the Terramar Coastal Improvement Project, it is recommended that a cultural resource monitoring program be implemented for the project.

PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The project site is located along the Pacific Coast south of Agua Hedionda, within an unsectioned portion of the Aqua Hedionda land grant, in Township 11 South, Range 4 West on the San Luis Rey U.S.

Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle (Figures 1 and 2, Regional Location and USGS Topography, respectively). The project alignment is situated within the rights-of-way of Carlsbad Boulevard and Cannon Road (Figure 3, Aerial Photograph).

The project proposes to replace existing water mains with approximately 6,000 linear feet of new 12-inch pipe and the abandonment of two existing 6-inch and one existing 10-inch asbestos cement water mains via slurry filling from the northerly and southerly project limits on Carlsbad Boulevard.

Additional improvements include sewer main and manhole replacements and the resurfacing of the existing street. All ground-disturbing activities are slated to occur within the existing, paved roadways.

Letter to Mr. Sean Diaz Page 2 of 7
April 22, 2022

The project is part of the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) that maintains, rehabilitates, improves, or replaces water and sewer infrastructure. Potential environmental impacts associated with CIP projects were analyzed in the City of Carlsbad Sewer Master Plan and Carlsbad Municipal Water District Water and Recycled Water Master Plans Update Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) & Addendum (EIR 12-01; SCH No. 2012021006). The majority of the project is included in the CIP project W-15 that was included in the 2019 Addendum to the PEIR. Per the PEIR’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), CIP projects proposed in close proximity to a known cultural resource or projects that would result in ground-disturbing activities in a previously undisturbed area require a project-level cultural resources investigation. As outlined in Cul-1 in the MMRP, the cultural resources investigation includes this initial step:

1. A CIP project site-specific review of the records search data at the South Coastal Information Center shall be conducted to determine if the CIP project site has been subjected to a professional survey.
a. If a current cultural resources report addressing potential impacts on cultural resources is available, the city or CMWD shall implement the mitigation measures provided within the report. In the event that a current and valid report is not available, or if the entirety of the CIP project site has not been professionally surveyed, then an updated records search shall be performed.
b. In accordance with the 2017 Tribal, Cultural and Paleontological Guidelines, the City or CMWD shall contact the NAHC and local tribal governments for input on the project in order to identify any additional Native American resources that may not be included in the records search.

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Cultural resources are defined as buildings, sites, structures, or objects, each of which may have historical, architectural, archaeological, cultural, and/or scientific importance. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code (PRC) 21084.1, and California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 14 Section 15064.5, address determining the significance of impacts to archaeological and historic resources and discuss significant cultural resources as “historical resources,” which are defined as:
• resource(s) listed or determined eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR; 14 CCR Section 15064.5[a][1]) • resource(s) either listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or in a “local register of historical resources” or identified as significant in a historical resource survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the PRC, unless “the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant” (14 CCR Section 15064.5[a][2]) • resources determined by the Lead Agency to meet the criteria for listing on the CRHR (14 CCR Section 15064.5[a][3])

Letter to Mr. Sean Diaz Page 3 of 7
April 22, 2022

For listing in the CRHR, a historical resource must be significant at the local, state, or national level under one or more of the following four criteria:

1. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States;

2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history;

3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; and/or

4. It has yielded or has the potential to yield information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation.

Under 14 CCR Section 15064.5(a)(4), a resource may also be considered a “historical resource” for the purposes of CEQA at the discretion of the lead agency.

Significant resources must retain enough of their historic character or appearance to be recognizable as historical resources and to convey the reasons for their significance. Resource integrity, which is the authenticity of a historical resource’s physical identity evidenced by the survival of characteristics that existed during the resource’s period of significance, is evaluated with regard to the retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. In an archaeological deposit, integrity is assessed with reference to the preservation of material constituents and their culturally and historically meaningful spatial relationships. A resource must also be judged with reference to the particular CRHR criteria under which it is proposed for eligibility.

City of Carlsbad Tribal, Cultural, and Paleontological Resources Guidelines In 1990, the City developed guidelines for the treatment of cultural resources. The guidelines were consistent with the cultural and historical resource guidelines set forth by the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), as amended, and CEQA, established standards of performance for resource investigation, and presented a systematic method of preserving identified resources. Carlsbad City Council Policy No. 83, adopted in 2016, called for the City to: “recognize [the City’s] responsibility to protect with improved certainty the important historical and cultural values of current Tribal Cultural Resources within the City limits and to establish an improved framework for the City's consultations with Native American Tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the City of Carlsbad, including the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians.”
In 2017, updated Tribal, Cultural and Paleontological Guidelines were released to address the regulatory changes and the addition of new procedures to address additional requirements that had emerged since 1990 (ECORP 2017). The guidelines provide a framework for the roles and responsibilities of those responsible for compliance with the Guidelines and provide the processes by which cultural resources are assessed under the Guidelines.

Letter to Mr. Sean Diaz Page 4 of 7
April 22, 2022

PROJECT SITE-SPECIFIC REVIEW METHODS
HELIX reviewed a 2016 AECOM cultural resources survey report prepared for a separate project that shares the same project alignment (Foglia and Wilson 2016), and conducted an updated record search of the project area and a half-mile radius at the SCIC on January 12, 2022. Reports of previous cultural resources studies covering the project site or adjacent areas, and site forms for cultural properties were reviewed to assess the existence of, or potential for, cultural properties to be present within the project alignment. Because all project-related ground-disturbing activities are slated to occur within existing, paved roadways, an updated field survey was not conducted as part of this study.

The NAHC was contacted for a Sacred Lands File search on January 7, 2022, the results of which were received March 9, 2022. No additional outreach to the Native American community was conducted as part of this study.

PROJECT SITE-SPECIFIC REVIEW RESULTS
Summary of 2016 AECOM Study
AECOM conducted a cultural resources survey for the City’s Terramar Coastal Improvement Project, which shared the same project boundaries as the current project alignment (Foglia and Wilson 2016).

The 2016 AECOM study included a records search at the SCIC, a search of the NAHC’s Sacred Lands File, an intensive pedestrian cultural resources survey, and evaluation of identified cultural resources. Native American outreach was also conducted by AECOM.

The SCIC record search conducted in 2016 indicated that 41 studies had been conducted within the half- mile search radius; of these, ten had been undertaken within or overlapping the project alignment. The search also identified 17 previously recorded resources (11 prehistoric sites, three historic sites, two prehistoric isolates, and one historic isolate) within the half-mile search radius, four of which were recorded as being within the project area (Foglia and Wilson 2016).

AECOM contacted the NAHC for a search of their Sacred Lands File, the results of which were positive for the presence of Native American cultural resources within the project area. Following this, AECOM contacted individuals and tribes provided by the NAHC to determine if any Traditional Cultural Properties, sacred sites, resource collecting areas, or other areas of concern would be impacted by the project. Three responses were received: The Pala Band of Mission Indians wished to be updated on the project’s progression and have any documentation that related to cultural resources sent to them; the Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel requested a Kumeyaay and Luiseño monitor be present for all ground disturbing activities related to the project; and the Pauma & Yauima Reservation requested a site visit (Foglia and Wilson 2016).

The 2016 AECOM field survey resulted in the identification of four resources within the project area:
three historic sites, including a newly recorded resource, and one prehistoric site. Two of the historic sites consist of historic refuse and debris scatters (P-37-033636 and P-37-035622). The remaining historic site consists of a historic oil pipeline (P-37-032953). The prehistoric site consists of a hearth feature with a shell and lithic scatter (P-37-026517); only a small portion of the site was relocated. The fourth previously recorded prehistoric site, P-37-006751, was not identified during the survey and was determined to be mismapped by the SCIC. None of the sites within the project area were recommended

Letter to Mr. Sean Diaz Page 5 of 7
April 22, 2022

as eligible for listing in the CRHR based on the lack of subsurface component and the lack of association with any person or event significant in our history (Foglia and Wilson 2016).

AECOM noted that, given the number of known cultural resources within the vicinity of the project alignment, along with the fact that much of the project area had been developed over prior to the enaction of CEQA, there may be buried cultural resources within the paved areas of the project. As such, AECOM recommended that all ground-disturbing work be monitored by a qualified archaeologist and a Native American representative (Foglia and Wilson 2016).

Records Search Update
The current records search update indicated that nine cultural resources studies have been submitted to the SCIC since the initial 2016 AECOM study; these include the 2016 AECOM study itself, two predating the study, and five that date after the study was completed (Table 1, Update of Previous Studies Within One Half-Mile of the Project Alignment). Of these, only the 2016 AECOM study overlaps with the project area. The remaining studies include three archaeological surveys and assessments, three archaeological monitoring reports, a cultural resources treatment plan, and a cultural resources study Table 1

UPDATE OF PREVIOUS STUDIES WITHIN ONE HALF-MILE OF THE PROJECT ALIGNMENT Report
No. (SD-) Report Title Author, Date
16127 Cultural Resources Treatment Plan North Coast Interstate 5 Corridor Dominici and Laylander, 2008
16131 Sixth Supplemental Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR): Revised Area of Potential Effects (APE) I-5 North Coast Corridor Blake, 2013
16219* Cultural Resources Phase I Survey Report for the Terramar Coastal Improvement Project Carlsbad, California
Foglia and Wilson, 2016
16300 Letter Report: eTS 29398 – Cultural Resources Monitoring Report for the Encina Substation Bank 61 Addition, City of Carlsbad, San Diego County, California
Glenny, 2015
17230 Cultural Resources Assessment of the TaylorMade PUC Project, Carlsbad, San Diego County, California
Brunzell, 2017
17232 San Diego 55 Fiber Project, San Diego County, California Brunzell, 2017 17489 Revised Letter Report: eTS 31644 – Cultural Resources Monitoring Report for MHPUUP – Solamar Mobile Estates, City of Carlsbad, San Diego County, California
Roy and Cooley, 2018
18208 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Chick-Fil-A I-5 and Palomar Airport Road FSU Project, City of Carlsbad, California
Clark and Duran, 2019
18797 Archaeological monitoring for the SDG&E Strawberry Fields Weed Abatement Maintenance, TL23012 & 23053, Carlsbad Hub, San Diego County, California
Jordan, 2020
* Overlaps with Project Alignment
The records search update resulted in the identification of two additional cultural resources within the records search limits that were recorded during or following the 2016 AECOM study (Table 2, Update of Cultural Resources Recorded within One Half-Mile of the Project Alignment). These resources include a

Letter to Mr. Sean Diaz Page 6 of 7
April 22, 2022

small trash burning area and an office building; neither of which are directly within the current project alignment.

Table 2

UPDATE OF CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDED WITHIN ONE HALF-MILE OF THE PROJECT

ALIGNMENT
Resource
Number
(P-37-)
Resource
Number
(CA-SDI-
Age and
Resources
Present
Description Recorder, Date
035622 21807 Historic Site Small trash burning area Foglia and Droessler, 2016 039089 --- Historic
Address
Two-story, multi-unit office building Williams, 2019

Sacred Lands File Search
The NAHC was contacted on March 1, 2022, for a Sacred Lands File search. The NAHC indicated in a response dated March 9, 2022, that the result of the Sacred Lands File check was positive for the project area and indicated to contact the La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians for more information (Attachment B). No additional outreach to the Native American community was conducted as part of this study.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
HELIX utilized a 2016 AECOM cultural resource survey that encompassed the current project alignment, conducted a records search update for the project area and a half-mile search radius, and contacted the NAHC for an updated Sacred Lands File search. The 2016 record search and 2022 update indicated that a total of 50 studies had been conducted, and 19 cultural resources had been recorded, within the half- mile search radius. Four cultural resources have been identified within or adjacent to the project alignment, none of which are eligible for listing in the CRHR. The Sacred Lands File search was returned with positive results for the project area.

As such, the project will not have an adverse impact on significant historical resources, per CEQA. As noted in the 2016 AECOM report, the area containing the project alignment was developed prior to the enactment of CEQA – because of this, buried cultural resources may be present within the current project alignment, which exists entirely in the paved roadways. No evidence was found to revise the conclusions of the 2016 AECOM report regarding cultural resources within the current project area. The 2016 AECOM report recommended archaeological monitoring be conducted by a qualified archaeologist and a Native American Monitor; this report does not change that recommendation.

Letter to Mr. Sean Diaz Page 7 of 7
April 22, 2022

If you have any questions, please contact Stacie Wilson at [email protected] or at (619) 462-1515 extension 243.

James Turner, M.A., RPA Stacie Wilson, M.S., RPA
Staff Archaeologist Senior Archaeologist

Attachments:

Figure 1: Project Location
Figure 2: USGS Topography
Figure 3: Aerial Photograph

Attachment A: Record Search Summary
Attachment B: Sacred Lands File Search Results

REFERENCES
ECORP Consulting, Inc.
2017 Carlsbad Tribal, Cultural, and Paleontological Resources Guidelines. Electronic document, available at https://www.carlsbadca.gov/home/ showpublisheddocument/254/637425976516870000, accessed January 18, 2022

Foglia, Shannon, and Stacie Wilson
2016 Cultural Resources Phase I Survey Report for the Terramar Coastal Improvement Project, Carlsbad, California. Prepared by AECOM for the City of Carlsbad. Report on file at the South Coastal Information Center, San Diego State University, San Diego, California.

!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!!!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
! !
! !
!
!
!!
! ! !
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
! !
! !
!
!!!
!
!
!!
!
!!
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
! !
! !
!! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!!!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!!!!!
!!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!!
!
!!!!!!
! ! ! ! !!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!"a$ ?¹
!"^$
?³
?¸!"^$
WÌ
!"a$ ?¸
?¸
?t WÊ
?¦
?¦
%&s(
!"a$!"^$
WÌ
!"_$
!"_$
?n
Ag Aä
?Ë
?p
!"^$ %&u(
%&s(
?Ë
Aä
?p
?¹
POWAY

OCEANSIDE

CARLSBAD
VISTA

ESCONDIDO
OTAY

CHULA VISTA
SANTEE
SAN
MARCOS

ENCINITAS

EL CAJON

LA MESA

CORONADO NATIONAL
CITY

IMPERIAL
BEACH
LEMON
GROVE
SOLANA
BEACH

DEL MAR
SAN
DIEGO

TIJUANA

UNITED STATES
MEXICO

DULZURA
JULIAN
RAMONA
WARNER

SPRINGS

RIVERSIDE
COUNTY
ORANGE
COUNTY

SAN DIEGO
COUNTY
!
Project Site
ALPINE
LA
JOLLA
?¹

FALLBROOK
Figure 1
Regional Location
I:\PROJECTS\C\CarlsbadMunicipalWD_01174\00005_CMWDTerramar\Map\CUL\Fig1_Regional.mxd 01174.00005.001 1/7/2022 - DY Source: Base Map Layers (SanGIS, 2016)
K
CMWD Terramar Area Sewer & Water Main Improvements Cultural Resources Assessment 0 8 Miles
Figure 2
USGS Topography
I:\PROJECTS\C\CarlsbadMunicipalWD_01174\00005_CMWDTerramar\Map\CUL\Fig2_USGS.mxd 01174.00005.001 1/7/2022 - DY Source: SAN LUIS REY 7.5' Quad (USGS)
CMWD Terramar Area Sewer & Water Main Improvements Cultural Resources Assessment 0 2,000 Feet
K
Project Site
CarlsbadBlvd
Cannon Rd
Manzano Dr
Cerezo Dr
TierraDelOroSt
Avenida Encinas
Carlsbad Blvd
LosRoblesDr
Shor e Dr
ElArbolDr
§¨¦5
Figure 3
Aerial Photograph
I:\PROJECTS\C\CarlsbadMunicipalWD_01174\00005_CMWDTerramar\Map\CUL\Fig3_Aerial.mxd 01174.00005.001 1/7/2022 - DY Source: Aerial (Maxar, 2020)
K
CMWD Terramar Area Sewer & Water Main Improvements Cultural Resources Assessment 0 600 Feet
Project Site

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

Page 1 of 1 ends

March 9, 2022

Stacie Wilson
HELIX Environmental Planning

Via Email to: [email protected]

Re: Terramar Area Sewer & Water Main Improvements Project, San Diego County

Dear Ms. Wilson:

A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information submitted for the above referenced project. The results were positive. Please contact the La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians on the attached list for information. Please note that tribes do not always record their sacred sites in the SLF, nor are they required to do so. A SLF search is not a substitute for consultation with tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with a project’s geographic area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites, such as the appropriate regional California Historical Research Information System (CHRIS) archaeological Information Center for the presence of recorded archaeological sites.

Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. Please contact all of those listed; if they cannot supply information, they may recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance, we can assure that our lists contain current information.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,

Andrew Green
Cultural Resources Analyst

Attachment

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

SECRETARY
Sara Dutschke
Miwok

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan

COMMISSIONER
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

COMMISSIONER
Wayne Nelson
Luiseño

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kumeyaay

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Christina Snider
Pomo

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

Barona Group of the Capitan
Grande
Edwin Romero, Chairperson
1095 Barona Road
Lakeside, CA, 92040
Phone: (619) 443 - 6612
Fax: (619) 443-0681
[email protected]
Diegueno
Campo Band of Diegueno
Mission Indians
Ralph Goff, Chairperson
36190 Church Road, Suite 1
Campo, CA, 91906
Phone: (619) 478 - 9046
Fax: (619) 478-5818
[email protected]
Diegueno
Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay
Indians
Robert Pinto, Chairperson
4054 Willows Road
Alpine, CA, 91901
Phone: (619) 368 - 4382
Fax: (619) 445-9126
[email protected]
Diegueno
Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay
Indians
Michael Garcia, Vice Chairperson
4054 Willows Road
Alpine, CA, 91901
Phone: (619) 933 - 2200
Fax: (619) 445-9126
[email protected]
Diegueno
Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
Virgil Perez, Chairperson
P.O. Box 130
Santa Ysabel, CA, 92070
Phone: (760) 765 - 0845
Fax: (760) 765-0320
Diegueno
Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
Clint Linton, Director of Cultural
Resources
P.O. Box 507
Santa Ysabel, CA, 92070
Phone: (760) 803 - 5694
[email protected]
Diegueno
Inaja-Cosmit Band of Indians
Rebecca Osuna, Chairperson
2005 S. Escondido Blvd.

Escondido, CA, 92025
Phone: (760) 737 - 7628
Fax: (760) 747-8568
Diegueno
Jamul Indian Village
Erica Pinto, Chairperson
P.O. Box 612
Jamul, CA, 91935
Phone: (619) 669 - 4785
Fax: (619) 669-4817
[email protected]
Diegueno
Jamul Indian Village
Lisa Cumper, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
P.O. Box 612
Jamul, CA, 91935
Phone: (619) 669 - 4855
[email protected]
Diegueno
Kwaaymii Laguna Band of
Mission Indians
Carmen Lucas,
P.O. Box 775
Pine Valley, CA, 91962
Phone: (619) 709 - 4207
Kwaaymii
Diegueno
La Jolla Band of Luiseno
Indians
Norma Contreras, Chairperson
22000 Highway 76
Pauma Valley, CA, 92061
Phone: (760) 742 - 3771
Luiseno
La Posta Band of Diegueno
Mission Indians
Javaughn Miller, Tribal
Administrator
8 Crestwood Road
Boulevard, CA, 91905
Phone: (619) 478 - 2113
Fax: (619) 478-2125
[email protected]
Diegueno
1 of 3
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Terramar Area Sewer & Water Main Improvements Project, San Diego County.

PROJ-2022-
000985
03/09/2022 03:40 PM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
San Diego County
3/9/2022
La Posta Band of Diegueno
Mission Indians
Gwendolyn Parada, Chairperson
8 Crestwood Road
Boulevard, CA, 91905
Phone: (619) 478 - 2113
Fax: (619) 478-2125
[email protected]
Diegueno
Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay
Nation
Angela Elliott Santos, Chairperson
P.O. Box 1302
Boulevard, CA, 91905
Phone: (619) 766 - 4930
Fax: (619) 766-4957
Diegueno
Mesa Grande Band of Diegueno
Mission Indians
Michael Linton, Chairperson
P.O Box 270
Santa Ysabel, CA, 92070
Phone: (760) 782 - 3818
Fax: (760) 782-9092
[email protected]
Diegueno
Pala Band of Mission Indians
Shasta Gaughen, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula
Rd.

Pala, CA, 92059
Phone: (760) 891 - 3515
Fax: (760) 742-3189
[email protected]
Cupeno
Luiseno
Pauma Band of Luiseno Indians
Temet Aguilar, Chairperson
P.O. Box 369
Pauma Valley, CA, 92061
Phone: (760) 742 - 1289
Fax: (760) 742-3422
[email protected]
Luiseno
Pechanga Band of Indians
Mark Macarro, Chairperson
P.O. Box 1477
Temecula, CA, 92593
Phone: (951) 770 - 6000
Fax: (951) 695-1778
[email protected]
Luiseno
Pechanga Band of Indians
Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources
Coordinator
P.O. Box 1477
Temecula, CA, 92593
Phone: (951) 770 - 6306
Fax: (951) 506-9491
[email protected]
Luiseno
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Cheryl Madrigal, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
One Government Center Lane
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Phone: (760) 297 - 2635
[email protected]
Luiseno
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson
One Government Center Lane
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Phone: (760) 749 - 1051
Fax: (760) 749-5144
[email protected]
Luiseno
San Luis Rey Band of Mission
Indians
San Luis Rey, Tribal Council
1889 Sunset Drive
Vista, CA, 92081
Phone: (760) 724 - 8505
Fax: (760) 724-2172
[email protected]
Luiseno
San Luis Rey Band of Mission
Indians
1889 Sunset Drive
Vista, CA, 92081
Phone: (760) 724 - 8505
Fax: (760) 724-2172
[email protected]
Luiseno
2 of 3
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

PROJ-2022-
000985
03/09/2022 03:40 PM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
San Diego County
3/9/2022
San Pasqual Band of Diegueno
Mission Indians
Allen Lawson, Chairperson
P.O. Box 365
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Phone: (760) 749 - 3200
Fax: (760) 749-3876
[email protected]
Diegueno
San Pasqual Band of Diegueno
Mission Indians
John Flores, Environmental
Coordinator
P. O. Box 365
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Phone: (760) 749 - 3200
Fax: (760) 749-3876
[email protected]
Diegueno
Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians
Isaiah Vivanco, Chairperson
P. O. Box 487
San Jacinto, CA, 92581
Phone: (951) 654 - 5544
Fax: (951) 654-4198
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Luiseno
Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians
Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural
Resource Department
P.O. BOX 487
San Jacinto, CA, 92581
Phone: (951) 663 - 5279
Fax: (951) 654-4198
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Luiseno
Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay
Nation
Cody Martinez, Chairperson
1 Kwaaypaay Court
El Cajon, CA, 92019
Phone: (619) 445 - 2613
Fax: (619) 445-1927
[email protected]
Kumeyaay
Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay
Nation
Kristie Orosco, Kumeyaay
Resource Specialist
1 Kwaaypaay Court
El Cajon, CA, 92019
Phone: (619) 445 - 6917
Kumeyaay
Viejas Band of Kumeyaay
Indians
Ernest Pingleton, Tribal Historic
Officer, Resource Management
1 Viejas Grade Road
Alpine, CA, 91901
Phone: (619) 659 - 2314
[email protected]
Diegueno
Viejas Band of Kumeyaay
Indians
John Christman, Chairperson
1 Viejas Grade Road
Alpine, CA, 91901
Phone: (619) 445 - 3810
Fax: (619) 445-5337
Diegueno
3 of 3
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

PROJ-2022-
000985
03/09/2022 03:40 PM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
San Diego County
3/9/2022

Drawings

CITY OF CARLSBAD

BOARD OF DIRECTORS / CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER

IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
CIP 5048 AND 5503
DECEMBER 2023
Carlsbad
Municipal Water District

CONSTRUCTION PLANS

FOR THE

KEITH BLACKBURN - PRESIDENT / MAYOR

MELANIE BURKHOLDER - BOARD / COUNCIL MEMBER

CAROLYN LUNA - BOARD / COUNCIL MEMBER

PRIYA BHAT-PATEL - BOARD / COUNCIL MEMBER

TERESA ACOSTA - BOARD / COUNCIL MEMBER

SCOTT CHADWICK - EXECUTIVE MANAGER / CITY MANAGER
FILE:

SCALE:

VICINITY MAP

NO SCALE
200852 LOCATION MAP

PROJECT

LOCATION

DECLARATION OF ENGINEER OF WORK

I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE DESIGN OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS COMPLIES WITH PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND PRACTICES. AS THE ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF THE DESIGN OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS, I ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBLE CHARGE FOR SUCH DESIGN. I

UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE PLAN CHECK OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD IS A

REVIEW FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF ENSURING THE PLANS COMPLY WITH CITY PROCEDURES AND OTHER APPLICABLE POLICIES AND ORDINANCES. THE PLAN CHECK IS NOT A DETERMINATION OF THE TECHNICAL ADEQUACY OF THE DESIGN OF THE IMPROVEMENTS. SUCH PLAN CHECK DOES NOT, THEREFORE, RELIEVE ME OF MY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DESIGN OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS.

ENGINEER LICENSE NO. DATE FILE:

SCALE:

LOCATION MAP

NO SCALE
200852 LOCATION MAP

PROJECT SITE
PROJECT BOUNDARY:

WORK BEGINS NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND TIERRA DEL ORO AND CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND MANZANO DRIVE. IN GENERAL, THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON CARLSBAD BOULEVARD FROM TIERRA DEL ORO SOUTH TO APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET SOUTH OF MANZANO DRIVE. IT ALSO INCLUDES A

ONE-QUARTER MILE AREA ALONG CANNON ROAD FROM CARLSBAD BOULEVARD EAST ACROSS THE RAILROAD TRACKS TO AVENIDA ENCINAS.

SCOPE OF WORK:

WORK INCLUDES THE REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING WATER MAINS WITH APPROXIMATELY 5,000 LF OF NEW 12-INCH PVC PIPE ALONG CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND CANNON ROAD, USING OPEN TRENCH AND TRENCHLESS METHODS AT THE RAILROAD CROSSING. WORK INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF WATER SERVICES AND APPURTENANCES, AND ABANDONMENT VIA SLURRY FILLING AND/OR REMOVAL OF APPROXIMATELY 7,600 LF OF EXISTING 6-INCH ASBESTOS CEMENT (AC) WATER MAINS AND SEGMENTS OF EXISTING 10-INCH AND 12-INCH AC WATER MAINS; ROUGHLY 1,400 LF OF EXISTING 10-INCH AND 12-INCH WILL BE REMOVED; AND ROUGHLY 6,200 LF OF EXISTING 6-INCH TO 10-INCH WILL BE ABANDONED.

WORK ALSO INCLUDES TRENCHLESS REHABILITATION AND OPEN TRENCH SEWER MAIN AND MANHOLE REPLACEMENTS, APPROXIMATELY 1,500 LF OF EXISTING 6-INCH, 8-INCH AND 10-INCH DIAMETER VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE (VCP); ROUGHLY 800 LF OF EXISTING 10-INCH SEWER WILL BE REHABILITATED, AND 700 LF OF NEW 8-INCH WILL REPLACE 700 LF OF EXISTING 6-INCH SEWER. THE EXISTING WATERLINE AND SEWER REPLACEMENT WILL BE WITHIN THE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY ROADWAY. THE PROJECT WILL ALSO INCLUDE TRENCH RESURFACING OF THE EXISTING STREET.

THE PROJECT WILL USE A MODIFIED GS-26 STANDARD TRENCH REPAIR (DETAIL 13 ON SHEET 23) TO INCLUDE A 2-INCH GRIND AND OVERLAY EXTENDING ONE FOOT BEYOND EACH SIDE OF THE TRENCH. THIS TRENCH REPAIR WILL APPLY FOR THE PROJECT LIMIT AS FOLLOWS:
a. CARLSBAD BOULEVARD - FROM TIERRA DEL ORO SOUTH TO MANZANO DRIVE b. CANNON ROAD - FROM CARLSBAD BOULEVARD EAST ACROSS THE RAILROAD TRACKS TO, AND INCLUDING, THE AVENIDA ENCINAS INTERSECTION.
c.

FOR CARLSBAD BOULEVARD (SOUTH OF MANZANO DRIVE), THE TRENCH RESURFACING WILL INCLUDE THE MODIFIED GS-26 TRENCH REPAIR DESCRIBED ABOVE, PLUS RESTRIPING AND A SLURRY SEAL APPLICATION FOR THE LANE IMPACTED.

ANDREW J. FROST 77724 12/22/2023 PROJECT NO.

LAST SAVED BY:

FILE NAME:

JM
GD
AF
G-01
1 GENERAL

TITLE SHEET

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:27:09-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
’ ” – ’
’’ ’ ”
– ’

’
’
’
’
’
’

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
PROJECT NO.

LAST SAVED BY:

FILE NAME:

JM
GD
AF
G-02
2 GENERAL

GENERAL NOTES
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:27:43-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024

2980.5
3130
3130

MANZANO DR

AVENIDA ENCINAS

CANNON RD

CARLSBAD BLVD
C-01
C-02
C-03
C-04
C-05
C-06
C-07
C-10
C-09
C-08
C-13
C-12
C-13
C-14

TIERRA DE
ORO ST

SHORE DR
NORTH

SHORE DR
SOUTH

CEREZO DR

EL ARBOL D
R

LOSROBLES DR
PH
M

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
PROJECT NO.

LAST SAVED BY:

FILE NAME:

JM
GD
AF
G-03
3 GENERAL

ABBREVIATIONS AND LEGEND
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:28:09-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
PH2A
PH2B
PH1
PH7
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
V
V
V V
V
V
V V
ss
s
s
X
X X
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XXXX
X

XXXXXXX
X
X
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
4545
45 45
45 45
50 55

FOR WATER IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-08
6 6
SS

SS SS SS
45° BEND
STA=12+90.00
N=1993627.33
E=6229364.27
45° BEND
STA=13+45.23
N=1993574.06
E=6229349.68
12" x 12" TEE
STA=13+79.45

CARLSBAD BLVD LINE
EQUALS
STA=50+00.00

CANNON RD LINE
N=1993544.35
E=6229366.68
12" GV (3)

22.5° BEND
STA=14+05.01
N=1993522.16
E=6229379.35

22.5° BEND
STA=14+52.44
N=1993494.69
E=6229418.01
6 6
6 W
W

W W W W W W W
W
W
10+00
11+00
12+00
13+00
14+00
15+00
W
20+00
21+00
TIE INTO EXIST 8" PVC WATER
STA=21+00.37
N=1993841.76
E=6229124.85
L3
L4
L2
L1
4 11.25° BEND
STA=20+45.64
N=1993862.97
E=6229175.31
STA=9+91.40

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER LINE
STA=20+00.00

TIERRA DEL ORO LINE
N=1993885.84
E=6229214.81
TIE INTO EXIST 12" AC WATER
8 STA=9+89.37 24.96' RT

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER LINE
EQUALS
STA=26+19.45

CARLSBAD BLVD CL
N=1993875.10
E=6229192.18

EQUATION
MAR
STA=20+05.00
N=1993883.33
E=6229210.48
27 4
C-18
3 C-18
L5
6 MAR
STA=9+98.00
N=1993880.12
E=6229218.11
27 MAR
STA=13+73.00
N=1993549.95
E=6229363.46
MAR
STA=13+84.00
N=1993540.40
E=6229368.92
27 27
STA=50+12.02 -20.01' LT

CANNON RD WATER LINE
EQUALS
STA=100+00.00

CANNON RD CL
N=1993567.43
E=6229370.18

EQUATION
28 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
28 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
9+80 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00
STA=9+91.40
12" x 8" TEE
CL ELEV =41.15'
STA=13+45.23
12" 45° BEND
CL ELEV =43.29'
STA=13+79.45

CARLSBAD BLVD LINE
EQUALS
STA=50+00.00

CANNON RD LINE
12" TEE
CL ELEV =43.54'
STA=14+05.01
12" 22.5° BEND
CL ELEV =43.60'
STA=12+90.00
12" 45° BEND
CL ELEV =42.63'
STA=9+84.40
12" TRANSITION CLPG
CL ELEV =41.15'
STA=14+52.44
12" 22.5° BEND
CL ELEV =44.00'

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL
EXIST
COM
INV=UNK
EXIST
COM
INV=UNK
EXIST
E
INV=UNK
STA=9+94.39
12" GV
CL ELEV = 41.15'
STA=9+88.38
12" GV
CL ELEV = 41.15'
CONSTRUCT 516 LF
12" PVC C900
S = 0.0082
S = 0.0050

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
S = 0.0119
S = 0.0017 S = 0.0081
1' CLR
(MIN)
STA=13+81.95
12" GV
CL ELEV = 43.56'
STA=13+76.95
12" GV
CL ELEV = 43.54'
18" RCP SD
(FUTURE BY OTHERS)
INV=35.0±
S = 0.0003
EXIST
3/4" G
INV=46.0±

RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS
PER DETAIL 11/C-20
S = 0.0066
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
STA 9+98.00
MAR
EXIST
30" SD
INV=35.1±
STA 13+73.00
MAR
STA 13+84.00
MAR
EXIST
E
INV=41.1±
STA=14+95.00

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =44.29'
Δ=3.24°
1' CLR
(MIN)

PIPE DATA TABLE

SEGMENT
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
LENGTH
298.60'

55.23'

59.79'

47.43'
2539.54'

BEARING
S30° 02' 07"E
S15° 18' 34"W
S29° 44' 42"E
S54° 36' 51"E
S30° 03' 09"E

POTHOLE TABLE
NAME
PH1
PH2A
PH2B
PH7

DESCRIPTION
MAG NAIL T-4.20 12IN AC WATER
T-0.44 B-1.50 COM ELEC
T-1.61 B-5.02 COM ELEC
T-2.69 B-2.88 2IN HP GAS MAG NAIL

ELEVATION

0.00 48.15

47.96 47.88

NORTHING
1993885.84
1993514.32
1993516.50
1993582.13

EASTING
6229214.82
6229367.84
6229366.84
6229409.06

KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH
MATCH LINE STA 15+00 SEE DWG C-02

THIS SHEET

CARLSBAD BLVD

TIERRA DEORO ST

CANNONRD
(HORIZ)
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

PLAN

PROFILE
KEY NOTES:

4. INSTALL NEW GATE VALVE PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO.

W-21. SIZE AND QTY PER PLAN.

1. CONSTRUCT NEW 12-INCH DR18 C900 PVC WATERLINE WITH
LOCATING WIRE AND WARNING TAPE. TRENCH AND PIPE
ZONE PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-2. REPAIR AC PAVEMENT
PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STD DRAWING GS-26 (MODIFIED).

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

6. INSTALL NEW FITTING. SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN.

8. INSTALL THRUST BLOCK PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-19,
SEE DETAIL 12/C-21 FOR THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREAS.
#

16. ALL EXISTING UTILITY PIPE SIZES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL

BE ENTIRELY FILLED BY PRESSURE GROUTING PER
SPECIFICATION 15000.

2. CONSTRUCT NEW 8-INCH DR18 C900 PVC WATERLINE WITH
LOCATING WIRE AND WARNING TAPE. TRENCH AND PIPE
ZONE PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-2. REPAIR AC PAVEMENT
PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STD DRAWING GS-26 (MODIFIED).

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

22. REMOVE EXISTING 12-INCH ACP WATERLINE PER
SPECIFICATIONS SECTIONS 02060 AND 02262.

27. INSTALL NEW MANUAL AIR RELEASE VALVE PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.

8. FOR BIDDING PURPOSES, ALL TRENCH REPAIR SECTIONS

FOR MAIN AND SERVICE PIPING WITHIN CARLSBAD

BOULEVARD SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE A MINIMUM OF
10-INCH AC OVER 6-INCH CONCRETE. ACTUAL SECTIONS

ARE KNOWN TO VARY ALONG THE ALIGNMENT AND SHOULD

BE REPLACED IN KIND PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD
DRAWING GS-26 (MODIFIED). SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

36. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE WHITE TRAFFIC

STRIPES/ARROWS/CROSSWALKS IN KIND TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

37. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE YELLOW/DOUBLE YELLOW
IN KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

41. PROTECT IN PLACE EUG. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM
VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER PIPE.

42. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM

VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER PIPE FOR
GAS SVC 2-INCHES AND SMALLER.

KEY NOTES (CONT'D):
#
1 5'

24.95' ±
16 16
2 FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS
1 100'
ROW

FOR SEWER IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-12
(VERT)
SCALE: 1" = 20'
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'
SEE SHEET C-11 FOR PROFILE
16 10'

34.59'

EXISTING CURB FACE

FUTURE CURB FACE BY OTHERS

EXISTING EOP

FUTURE CURB FACE BY OTHERS
22 16

14.42'
1 EXISTING 8"

PVC WATER
EXISTING 12"

AC WATER
FUTURE 18" RCP SD

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS

COASTAL JURISDICTION

CITY JURISDICTION
36 36
37 36
36 36
37 36
42 41
41 41
W
WARNING!!

EXISTING HIGH PRESSURE

GAS LINE TO REMAIN IN
PLACE. ANY WORK IN GAS

EASEMENT SHALL BE PER SDG&E

NOTES IN GENERAL NOTES

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
GD
JM
AF
C-01
4 CIVIL

CARLSBAD BLVD WATERLINE
STA 10+00 TO STA 15+00
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:29:06-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
V V
s s
s
s
502248.92
X
XXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X X
XXX
X
◊ ◊
◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊◊◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊◊
◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊
◊ ◊
◊◊
◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊
XX
XX
XXX
XXX
X X
X
X
X
X X
X
XX
X X X
XX
XXX
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
55 50
50 50
50 55
5050
50 50
55 50
55 50
45 50
55 1'
1'
7'
100'
ROW
15+00
16+00
17+00
18+00
19+00
20+00
SS SS
15+00
16+00
17+00
18+00
19+00
20+00

W W W W W W
30+00
STA=30+30.14
N=1993365.77
E=6229457.80
W W
STA=15+84.01

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER LINE
STA=30+00.00

SHORE DR NORTH LINE
N=1993380.81
E=6229483.92
TIE INTO EXIST 8" PVC WATER
MAR
STA=15+80.00
N=1993384.28
E=6229481.91
27 STA=15+83.98 5.17' RT

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER LINE
EQUALS
STA=31+93.36

CARLSBAD BLVD CL
N=1993378.24
E=6229479.41

EQUATION
W W
5 C-18
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
MAR
STA=15+88.00
N=1993377.36
E=6229485.92
27 BO
STA=30+04.00
N=1993378.83
E=6229480.44
28 W
32 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
32 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00
STA=15+84.01

CARLSBAD BLVD LINE
EQUALS
STA=30+00.00

SHORE DR NORTH LINE
12" x 8" TEE
CL ELEV =46.30'

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL
EXIST
3/4" G
INV=47.7±
CONSTRUCT 500 LF
12" PVC C900
STA=15+81.61
12" GV
CL ELEV = 46.30'
STA=15+86.41
12" GV
CL ELEV = 46.30'
S = 0.0006

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
S = 0.0163
EX 10" VCP SEWER CROSSING
NOT SHOWN AT INV ELEV = 26.90
EXIST
3/4" G
INV=UNK
STA 15+80.00
MAR
1' CLR
(MIN)
S = 0.0042
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
STA 15+88.00
MAR
18" RCP SD
(FUTURE BY OTHERS)
INV=36.8±
EXIST
1/2" G
INV=47.7±
STA=15+10.00

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =45.25'
Δ=2.76°
S = 0.0147
STA=16+83.33

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =45.90'
Δ=0.27°
STA=19+09.86

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =46.03'
Δ=0.91°

PIPE DATA TABLE

SEGMENT
L5
LENGTH
2539.54'

BEARING
S30° 03' 09"E

KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH
(HORIZ)
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
(VERT)
PLAN

PROFILE
MATCH LINE STA 20+00 SEE DWG C-03
THIS
SHEET

CARLSBAD BLVD
MATCH LINE STA 15+00 SEE DWG C-01

SHORE DR
NORTH
KEY NOTES:
#

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

6. INSTALL NEW FITTING. SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN.

8. INSTALL THRUST BLOCK PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-19,
SEE DETAIL 12/C-21 FOR THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREAS.

16. ALL EXISTING UTILITY PIPE SIZES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL

BE ENTIRELY FILLED BY PRESSURE GROUTING PER
SPECIFICATION 15000.

9. CONSTRUCT NEW COPPER TUBING WATER SERVICE
LATERAL PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-3 AND CITY OF
CARLSBAD STD DWG. NO. GS-25. PROVIDE NEW WATER

METER BOX AS SHOWN BEHIND FUTURE BACK OF WALK,
OUT OF DW. FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL PRIVATE SERVICE

PIPING AND APPURTENANCES TO FIELD ROUTE FROM NEW
METER TO EXISTING METER CONNECTION. CONTRACTOR

TO FIELD VERIFY BUILDINGS WITH EXISTING FIRE
SPRINKLERS. REPLACE WITH BACKFLOW PER CMWD DWG.

NO. W-5, AS NEEDED, FOR SERVICES WITH FIRE SPRINKLER
SYSTEM.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

27. INSTALL NEW MANUAL AIR RELEASE VALVE PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.

8. FOR BIDDING PURPOSES, ALL TRENCH REPAIR SECTIONS

FOR MAIN AND SERVICE PIPING WITHIN CARLSBAD

BOULEVARD SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE A MINIMUM OF
10-INCH AC OVER 6-INCH CONCRETE. ACTUAL SECTIONS

ARE KNOWN TO VARY ALONG THE ALIGNMENT AND SHOULD

BE REPLACED IN KIND PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD
DRAWING GS-26 (MODIFIED). SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

36. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE WHITE TRAFFIC

STRIPES/ARROWS/CROSSWALKS IN KIND TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

37. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE YELLOW/DOUBLE YELLOW
IN KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

42. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM

VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER PIPE FOR
GAS SVC 2-INCHES AND SMALLER.

44. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM RADIAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER METER.

45. PROTECT IN PLACE EUG. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM
RADIAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER METER.

KEY NOTES (CONT'D):
#KEY NOTES (CONT'D):
#
1 5'
16 16
2 FUTURE CURB FACE BY OTHERS

FOR SEWER

IMPROVEMENTS, SEE
SHEET C-12
9 5.83'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'

EXISTING CURB
FACE

FUTURE CURB

FACE BY OTHERS

EXISTING EOP

16.21'

18.45'

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS
SEE SHEET C-11

FOR PROFILE
9 L5
16 1

10.84'

EXIST 8" PVC WATER
EXIST 6" AC WATER
(ABANDONED)
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 36
37 36
36 36
36 36
36 36
36 36
36 37
37 37
37 37
37 37
37 37
37 37
36 36
36 36
36 36
36 45
9 45
45 42
44 44
44 Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.
42 42
9 36
37 44
9 CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
GD
JM
AF
C-02
5 CIVIL

CARLSBAD BLVD WATERLINE
STA 15+00 TO STA 20+00
44 44
44 45
45 Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:29:35-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
s
s
s
FH
V
V V
X
X
X
XX
X
X
X XX
X
XX
◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊ ◊
◊◊◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊ ◊
◊
◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊◊◊
◊
◊ ◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊◊
◊◊◊◊◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
X X X
XXXXXX
X
XX
XXX

XXXXXXX
X
X X
X
XXXXX
X
X
X X
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊◊
◊
◊◊◊
◊
◊◊◊◊
◊
◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊
◊
50 55
50 55
50 50
55 55
50 50
55 100'
ROW
1'
1'
1'
PH3

SS SS SS
20+00
21+00
22+00
23+00
24+00
25+00
W W W
40+00

W W W W
12" GV
STA=20+03.51
N=1993017.71
E=6229694.00
4 ARV
STA=23+83.50
N=1992688.80
E=6229884.30
25 STA=40+29.24
N=1992670.32
E=6229861.18
STA=23+87.94

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER LINE
STA=40+00.00

SHORE DR SOUTH LINE
N=1992684.95
E=6229886.50
TIE INTO EXISTING 8" PVC WATER
MAR
STA=23+92.50
N=1992681.01
E=6229888.81
27 STA=23+87.94 5.20' RT

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER LINE
EQUALS
STA=39+97.32

CARLSBAD BLVD CL
N=1992682.35
E=6229882.00

EQUATION
MAR
STA=40+05.00
N=1992682.45
E=6229882.17
27 5
C-18
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
MAR
STA=20+06.50
N=1993015.12
E=6229695.50
MAR
STA=20+00.50
N=1993020.31
E=6229692.48
27 27

W W W W W W
12" x 6" TEE
STA=21+55.59
N=1992886.07
E=6229770.15
6" GV (1)
4 6
8 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
60 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
60 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00
STA=23+87.94

CARLSBAD BLVD LINE
EQUALS
STA=40+00.00

SHORE DR SOUTH LINE
12" x 8" TEE
CL ELEV =50.00'

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL
EXIST
3/4" G
INV=50.6±
EXIST
3/4" G
INV=51.9±
EXIST
1 1/2" G
INV=51.5±
CONSTRUCT 500 LF
12" PVC C900
STA=23+85.51
12" GV
CL ELEV = 50.00'
STA=23+90.51
12" GV
CL ELEV = 50.00'

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
STA 23+83.50
ARV
S = 0.0064
STA=20+03.51
12" GV
CL ELEV = 47.55'
STA 23+92.50
MAR
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
STA 20+00.50
MAR
STA 20+06.50
MAR
STA=21+55.59
12" X 6" TEE
CL ELEV =48.52'
S = 0.0064
S = 0.0090

PIPE DATA TABLE

SEGMENT
L5
LENGTH
2539.54'

BEARING
S30° 03' 09"E

POTHOLE TABLE
NAME
PH3

DESCRIPTION
MAG NAILT T-2.79 B-2.93 1.5IN GAS

ELEVATION

54.52 NORTHING
1992698.29

EASTING
6229874.95

KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH
MATCH LINE STA 25+00 SEE DWG C-04

CARLSBAD BLVD
MATCH LINE STA 20+00 SEE DWG C-02
(HORIZ)
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
(VERT)
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

KEY NOTES:
#

4. INSTALL NEW GATE VALVE PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO.

W-21. SIZE AND QTY PER PLAN.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

16. ALL EXISTING UTILITY PIPE SIZES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL

BE ENTIRELY FILLED BY PRESSURE GROUTING PER
SPECIFICATION 15000.

9. CONSTRUCT NEW COPPER TUBING WATER SERVICE
LATERAL PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-3 AND CITY OF
CARLSBAD STD DWG. NO. GS-25. PROVIDE NEW WATER

METER BOX AS SHOWN BEHIND FUTURE BACK OF WALK,
OUT OF DW. FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL PRIVATE SERVICE

PIPING AND APPURTENANCES TO FIELD ROUTE FROM NEW
METER TO EXISTING METER CONNECTION. CONTRACTOR

TO FIELD VERIFY BUILDINGS WITH EXISTING FIRE
SPRINKLERS. REPLACE WITH BACKFLOW PER CMWD DWG.

NO. W-5, AS NEEDED, FOR SERVICES WITH FIRE SPRINKLER
SYSTEM.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

25. CONSTRUCT AIR VACUUM ASSEMBLY PER CMWD DWG W-11.

27. INSTALL NEW MANUAL AIR RELEASE VALVE PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.

8. FOR BIDDING PURPOSES, ALL TRENCH REPAIR SECTIONS

FOR MAIN AND SERVICE PIPING WITHIN CARLSBAD

BOULEVARD SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE A MINIMUM OF
10-INCH AC OVER 6-INCH CONCRETE. ACTUAL SECTIONS

ARE KNOWN TO VARY ALONG THE ALIGNMENT AND SHOULD

BE REPLACED IN KIND PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD
DRAWING GS-26 (MODIFIED). SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

36. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE WHITE TRAFFIC

STRIPES/ARROWS/CROSSWALKS IN KIND TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

45. PROTECT IN PLACE EUG. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM
RADIAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER METER.

KEY NOTES (CONT'D):
#

44. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM RADIAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER METER.

KEY NOTES (CONT'D):
#

48. REMOVE EXISTING FH AND INSTALL NEW FH ASSEMBLY
WITH PROTECTION POSTS PER W-17 AND W-18. DO NOT
BLOCK D/W. 3. CONSTRUCT NEW 6-INCH DR18 C900 PVC WATERLINE WITH LOCATING WIRE AND WARNING TAPE. TRENCH AND PIPE
ZONE PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-2. REPAIR AC PAVEMENT
PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STD DRAWING GS-26 (MODIFIED).

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

6. INSTALL NEW FITTING. SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN.

8. INSTALL THRUST BLOCK PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-19,
SEE DETAIL 12/C-20 FOR THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREAS.

37. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE YELLOW/DOUBLE YELLOW
IN KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

42. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM

VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER PIPE FOR
GAS SVC 2-INCHES AND SMALLER.

KEY NOTES (CONT'D):
#
PLAN

PROFILE
SHORE
DR
SOUTH
5'
2 FOR SEWER IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-14
16 1
16 5'

THIS SHEET
SCALE: 1" = 20'
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'

FUTURE CURB

FACE BY OTHERS

FUTURE CURB FACE BY OTHERS

EXISTING EOP

18.06'
SEE SHEET C-11

FOR PROFILE
9 9
L5
16 1

EXIST 8" PVC WATER
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
1 36
36 37
36 36
36 36
36 36
36 36
37 37
37 37
36 36
36 37
37 37
37 44
44 44
44 44
44 44
44 45
42 45
45 42
42 48
37 9
3 CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
GD
JM
AF
C-03
6 CIVIL

CARLSBAD BLVD WATERLINE
STA 20+00 TO STA 25+00
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:30:06-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
s
s
s
s
s
s
X
X
XXX
XXXX
X
X X
X
X
X
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊◊◊◊◊
◊ ◊
◊
◊◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊
◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊
50 55
55 55 55
55 55
50 55
Ground Obscu
red
Ground Obscur
ed
Gr
ound Obscur
ed
Ground Obscured
1'
100'
ROW
100'
ROW
25+00
26+00
27+00
28+00
29+00
30+00
PH4 PH22

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
25+00
26+00
27+00
28+00
29+00
30+00
W W
12" GV
STA=28+97.51
N=1992243.89
E=6230141.71
4 MAR
STA=29+00.00
N=1992241.73
E=6230142.94
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
MAR
STA=28+94.00
N=1992246.92
E=6230139.93
27 27

W W W W W W W W
W W
32 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
32 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL
EXIST
3/4" G
INV=51.0±
EXIST
COM
INV=51.9±
EXIST
E
INV=50.8±
EXIST
1" G
INV=49.7±
EXIST
COM
INV=UNK
EXIST
E
INV=UNK
CONSTRUCT 500 LF
12" PVC C900

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
STA=28+97.51
12" GV
CL ELEV = 47.57'
STA 29+00.00
MAR
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
STA 28+94.00
MAR
EXIST

LOOP DETECTOR
INV=UNK
S = 0.0022
STA=31+89.57

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =48.26'
Δ=0.39°
S = 0.0090
S = 0.0048

PIPE DATA TABLE

SEGMENT
L5
LENGTH
2539.54'

BEARING
S30° 03' 09"E

POTHOLE TABLE
NAME
PH4
PH22

DESCRIPTION
B-10.00 DRY HOLE ATT DUCTS
MAG NAIL COMM ELEC FROM PH 4 T-0.48 B-2.06

ELEVATION

53.97 53.77

NORTHING
1992543.85
1992512.03

EASTING
6229966.32
6229985.36
MATCH LINE STA 30+00 SEE DWG C-05

KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

CARLSBAD BLVD
MATCH LINE STA 25+00 SEE DWG C-03

THIS SHEET
(HORIZ)
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
(VERT)
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

KEY NOTES:
#

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

16. ALL EXISTING UTILITY PIPE SIZES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL

BE ENTIRELY FILLED BY PRESSURE GROUTING PER
SPECIFICATION 15000.

9. CONSTRUCT NEW COPPER TUBING WATER SERVICE
LATERAL PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-3 AND CITY OF
CARLSBAD STD DWG. NO. GS-25. PROVIDE NEW WATER

METER BOX AS SHOWN BEHIND FUTURE BACK OF WALK,
OUT OF DW. FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL PRIVATE SERVICE

PIPING AND APPURTENANCES TO FIELD ROUTE FROM NEW
METER TO EXISTING METER CONNECTION. CONTRACTOR

TO FIELD VERIFY BUILDINGS WITH EXISTING FIRE
SPRINKLERS. REPLACE WITH BACKFLOW PER CMWD DWG.

NO. W-5, AS NEEDED, FOR SERVICES WITH FIRE SPRINKLER
SYSTEM.

4. INSTALL NEW GATE VALVE PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO.

W-21. SIZE AND QTY PER PLAN.

27. INSTALL NEW MANUAL AIR RELEASE VALVE PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.

8. FOR BIDDING PURPOSES, ALL TRENCH REPAIR SECTIONS

FOR MAIN AND SERVICE PIPING WITHIN CARLSBAD

BOULEVARD SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE A MINIMUM OF
10-INCH AC OVER 6-INCH CONCRETE. ACTUAL SECTIONS

ARE KNOWN TO VARY ALONG THE ALIGNMENT AND SHOULD

BE REPLACED IN KIND PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD
DRAWING GS-26 (MODIFIED). SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

36. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE WHITE TRAFFIC

STRIPES/ARROWS/CROSSWALKS IN KIND TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

37. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE YELLOW/DOUBLE YELLOW
IN KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

44. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM RADIAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER METER.

45. PROTECT IN PLACE EUG. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM
RADIAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER METER.

KEY NOTES (CONT'D):
#

41. PROTECT IN PLACE EUG. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM
VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER PIPE.

42. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM

VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER PIPE FOR
GAS SVC 2-INCHES AND SMALLER.

KEY NOTES (CONT'D):
#
PLAN

PROFILE
1 5'
16 16

FUTURE CURB FACE BY OTHERS

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS

FOR SEWER IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-14 AND C-15
SCALE: 1" = 20'
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'

18.06'

30.24'
9 9
9 9
1 EXISTING OVERHEAD

LINES TO BE

UNDERGROUNDED BY

OTHERS (FUTURE)

MAINTAIN PEDESTRIAN ACCESS

TO COASTAL BLUFF TRAILS
9 9
9 9
9 36
36 36
36 36
36 37
37 37
37 37
37 37
37 36
36 36
36 36
45 44
44 44
44 44
44 45
42 41
42 45
45 45
45 CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
GD
JM
AF
C-04
7 CIVIL

CARLSBAD BLVD WATERLINE
STA 25+00 TO STA 30+00
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:30:27-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024

s
ss
FH
s
s
V V
s
s
501951.3
5 ◊◊◊
◊
◊◊◊
XX
◊
◊◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊
◊
◊◊
◊◊◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
50 50
5050
50 50
50 50
5050
50 100'
ROW
1'
1'
SS
12" x 6" TEE
STA=30+64.51
N=1992099.34
E=6230225.35
6" GV (1)
4 6
8 30+00
31+00
32+00
33+00
34+00
35+00

W W W W W W W W W W W
W
STA=30+31.97 5.03' RT

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER LINE
EQUALS
STA=46+41.34

CARLSBAD BLVD CL
N=1992124.99
E=6230204.68

EQUATION
M
M
M
M
M
M
W
MAR
STA=30+44.00
N=1992117.10
E=6230215.07
27 MAR
STA=30+34.00
N=1992125.75
E=6230210.05
27 12" X 8" TEE
STA=30+38.97
N=1992121.45
E=6230212.54
12" GV (2)
8" GV (1)
8" BLIND FLANGE (1)
4 6
8 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
60 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
60 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00
STA=30+64.51
12" x 6" TEE
CL ELEV =46.78'
STA=34+80.46
12" 45° BEND (VERT)
CL ELEV =44.10'
Δ=45.00° (VERT)
STA=34+83.09
12" 45° BEND (VERT)
CL ELEV =41.39'
Δ=45.00° (VERT)

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL
EXIST
8" SS
INV=39.2±
CONSTRUCT 500 LF
12" PVC C900
S = 0.0065

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
18" RCP SD
(FUTURE BY OTHERS)
INV=43.7±
1' CLR
(MIN)
EXIST

LOOP DETECTOR
INV=UNK
S = 1.0423
S = 0.0002
S = 0.0043
S = 0.0048
STA=30+41.37
12" GV
CL ELEV = 46.88'
STA=30+38.97
12" x 8" TEE
CL ELEV =46.89'
STA=30+36.52
12" GV
CL ELEV = 46.90'
STA 30+34.00
MAR
STA 30+44.03
MAR

PIPE DATA TABLE

SEGMENT
L5
LENGTH
2539.54'

BEARING
S30° 03' 09"E

KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH
MATCH LINE STA 35+00 SEE DWG C-06

CARLSBAD BLVD
MATCH LINE STA 30+00 SEE DWG C-04

THIS SHEET
(HORIZ)
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

CEREZO
DR
KEY NOTES:
#

4. INSTALL NEW GATE VALVE PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO.

W-21. SIZE AND QTY PER PLAN.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

6. INSTALL NEW FITTING. SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN.

8. INSTALL THRUST BLOCK PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-19,
SEE DETAIL 12/C-20 FOR THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREAS.

16. ALL EXISTING UTILITY PIPE SIZES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL

BE ENTIRELY FILLED BY PRESSURE GROUTING PER
SPECIFICATION 15000.

3. CONSTRUCT NEW 6-INCH DR18 C900 PVC WATERLINE WITH
LOCATING WIRE AND WARNING TAPE. TRENCH AND PIPE
ZONE PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-2. REPAIR AC PAVEMENT
PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STD DRAWING GS-26 (MODIFIED).

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

5. INSTALL NEW FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-17.

9. CONSTRUCT NEW COPPER TUBING WATER SERVICE
LATERAL PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-3 AND CITY OF
CARLSBAD STD DWG. NO. GS-25. PROVIDE NEW WATER

METER BOX AS SHOWN BEHIND FUTURE BACK OF WALK,
OUT OF DW. FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL PRIVATE SERVICE

PIPING AND APPURTENANCES TO FIELD ROUTE FROM NEW
METER TO EXISTING METER CONNECTION. CONTRACTOR

TO FIELD VERIFY BUILDINGS WITH EXISTING FIRE
SPRINKLERS. REPLACE WITH BACKFLOW PER CMWD DWG.

NO. W-5, AS NEEDED, FOR SERVICES WITH FIRE SPRINKLER
SYSTEM.

27. INSTALL NEW MANUAL AIR RELEASE VALVE PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

30. CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE ALL LOOP DETECTOR SYSTEM IN
KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.

8. FOR BIDDING PURPOSES, ALL TRENCH REPAIR SECTIONS

FOR MAIN AND SERVICE PIPING WITHIN CARLSBAD

BOULEVARD SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE A MINIMUM OF
10-INCH AC OVER 6-INCH CONCRETE. ACTUAL SECTIONS

ARE KNOWN TO VARY ALONG THE ALIGNMENT AND SHOULD

BE REPLACED IN KIND PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD
DRAWING GS-26 (MODIFIED). SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.
# KEY NOTES (CONT'D):

44. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM RADIAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER METER.

45. PROTECT IN PLACE EUG. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM
RADIAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER METER.

31. NO JOINTS IN WATER PIPE FOR 10-FT UPSTREAM AND
DOWNSTREAM OF CROSSING WITH FUTURE 18-INCH RCP
SD.

36. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE WHITE TRAFFIC

STRIPES/ARROWS/CROSSWALKS IN KIND TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.
# KEY NOTES (CONT'D):

37. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE YELLOW/DOUBLE YELLOW
IN KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

PLAN

PROFILE
1 16
16 FOR SEWER IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-15

FUTURE CURB FACE

BY OTHERS
3 9
SCALE: 1" = 20'
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'
(VERT)

FUTURE CURB FACE

BY OTHERS

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS

BY OTHERS

FUTURE CURB FACE

BY OTHERS

18.23'

26.95'

EXISTING CURB FACE

EXISTING EOP
9 5'
L5
1 5

EXISTING OVERHEAD LINES TO BE

UNDERGROUNDED BY OTHERS (FUTURE)

EXISTING OVERHEAD LINES TO BE

UNDERGROUNDED BY OTHERS (FUTURE)

9 9
16 MAINTAIN PEDESTRIAN ACCESS

TO COASTAL BLUFF TRAILS
1 FUTURE 18" RCP SD

IMPROVEMENTS BY
OTHERS
30 31
37 37
37 36
36 37
36 37
36 37
36 37
36 37
36 36
44 45
44 9
45 45
44 44
36 44
44 45
45 45

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
GD
JM
AF
C-05
8 CIVIL

CARLSBAD BLVD WATERLINE
STA 30+00 TO STA 35+00
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:30:57-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024

ss FH
V
s
XXX

XXXXXXX
◊
◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊◊
◊◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊◊◊
◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊
◊◊◊
◊◊◊
◊
◊◊◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊
5050 50
50 50
5050
50 50
50 50
1'
100'
ROW
35+00
36+00
37+00
38+00
39+00
12" x 6" TEE
STA=35+60.34
N=1991670.18
E=6230473.65
12" GV (1)
6" GV (1)
4 6
8 35+00
36+00
37+00
38+00
39+00
M
M
M
M
M

W W W W W W W W W
MAR
STA=35+55.39
N=1991674.45
E=6230471.16
27 W
30 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
30 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 39+50
STA=35+60.34
12" x 6" TEE
CL ELEV =45.50'
STA=35+24.10
12" 45° BEND (VERT)
CL ELEV =45.50'
Δ=45.00° (VERT)
STA=35+20.00
12" 45° BEND (VERT)
CL ELEV =41.40'
Δ=45.00° (VERT)
STA=37+50.00

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =45.89'
Δ=0.05° (VERT)
STA=38+50.00

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =46.02'
Δ=0.31° (VERT)
STA=39+40.00

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =46.61'
Δ=0.74° (VERT)
EXIST
18" CMP
(TO BE REMOVED)
INV=UNK
CONSTRUCT 450 LF
12" PVC C900

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
S = 0.0021
S = 0.0002
S = 0.0001 S = 0.0012 S = 0.0066
STA=35+57.98
12" GV
CL ELEV = 45.50'
STA 35+55.39
MAR
S = 1.0002

PIPE DATA TABLE

SEGMENT
L5
LENGTH
2539.54'

BEARING
S30° 03' 09"E

KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH
MATCH LINE STA 39+50 SEE DWG C-07

CARLSBAD BLVD
MATCH LINE STA 35+00 SEE DWG C-05

THIS SHEET
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

KEY NOTES:
#

4. INSTALL NEW GATE VALVE PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO.

W-21. SIZE AND QTY PER PLAN.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

6. INSTALL NEW FITTING. SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN.

8. INSTALL THRUST BLOCK PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-19,
SEE DETAIL 12/C-21 FOR THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREAS.

16. ALL EXISTING UTILITY PIPE SIZES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL

BE ENTIRELY FILLED BY PRESSURE GROUTING PER
SPECIFICATION 15000.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

5. INSTALL NEW FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-17.

9. CONSTRUCT NEW COPPER TUBING WATER SERVICE
LATERAL PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-3 AND CITY OF
CARLSBAD STD DWG. NO. GS-25. PROVIDE NEW WATER

METER BOX AS SHOWN BEHIND FUTURE BACK OF WALK,
OUT OF DW. FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL PRIVATE SERVICE

PIPING AND APPURTENANCES TO FIELD ROUTE FROM NEW
METER TO EXISTING METER CONNECTION. CONTRACTOR

TO FIELD VERIFY BUILDINGS WITH EXISTING FIRE
SPRINKLERS. REPLACE WITH BACKFLOW PER CMWD DWG.

NO. W-5, AS NEEDED, FOR SERVICES WITH FIRE SPRINKLER
SYSTEM.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.

8. FOR BIDDING PURPOSES, ALL TRENCH REPAIR SECTIONS

FOR MAIN AND SERVICE PIPING WITHIN CARLSBAD

BOULEVARD SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE A MINIMUM OF
10-INCH AC OVER 6-INCH CONCRETE. ACTUAL SECTIONS

ARE KNOWN TO VARY ALONG THE ALIGNMENT AND SHOULD

BE REPLACED IN KIND PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD
DRAWING GS-26 (MODIFIED). SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

36. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE WHITE TRAFFIC

STRIPES/ARROWS/CROSSWALKS IN KIND TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

37. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE YELLOW/DOUBLE YELLOW
IN KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

44. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM RADIAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER METER.

45. PROTECT IN PLACE EUG. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM
RADIAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER METER.
# KEY NOTES (CONT'D):
# KEY NOTES (CONT'D):

PLAN

PROFILE
1 3
16 16
9 SCALE: 1" = 20'
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS

FUTURE CURB FACE

BY OTHERS

EXISTING EOP

FUTURE CURB FACE BY OTHERS

17.98'

26.81'
5'
9 9
9 9
L5
5 EXISTING OVERHEAD LINES TO BE

UNDERGROUNDED BY OTHERS
(FUTURE)

FIELD VERIFY ABANDONED

AND REMOVE PORTIONS AS

REQUIRED FOR WATER MAIN

CONSTRUCTION

16 1
37 37
37 37
36 36
36 36
36 36
44 45
45 44
45 44
45 44
45 44

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
GD
JM
AF
C-06
9 CIVIL

CARLSBAD BLVD WATERLINE
STA 35+00 TO STA 39+50(HORIZ)
(VERT)
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:31:19-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024

ss
V
V
V
V
s
ss
s
5017

53.79 X
XXXX
◊
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
◊ ◊
◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
50 55
55 55
55 55
55 55
X
X
VARIES
ROW
PH6
PH5
12" 45° BEND
STA=43+19.34
N=1991011.77
E=6230842.95
40+00
41+00
42+00
43+00
W
STA=50+48.89
N=1991332.54
E=6230725.46
MAR
STA=39+73.50
N=1991312.54
E=6230680.55
STA=39+88.79 5.05' RT

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER LINE
EQUALS
STA=55+98.16

CARLSBAD BLVD CL
N=1991296.78
E=6230683.83

EQUATION

W W W W W W W W
12" 45° BEND
STA=43+35.59
N=1990995.94
E=6230839.26
STA=50+51.04
N=1991333.62
E=6230727.32
L6
L7
L8
L9
27 45° BEND
STA=39+91.98
N=1991296.55
E=6230689.80
45° BEND
STA=40+06.20
N=1991282.81
E=6230686.13
6 6
MAR
STA=39+83.50
N=1991303.89
E=6230685.55
27 6
C-19
3 7
C-19

TIE INTO EXIST
6" AC WATER
STA=43+49.75
N=1990984.40
E=6230847.46
6 6
50+00
STA=39+78.69

CARLSBAD BLVD

WATER LINE
STA=50+59.00
Manzano Rd
N=1991337.60
E=6230734.21
TIE INTO EXISTING 4"

AC WATER
32 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
32 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
39+50 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 43+80
STA=39+78.71
12" x 8" TEE
CL ELEV =47.30'
STA=43+19.34
12" 45° BEND
CL ELEV =51.40'
STA=40+06.20
12" 45° BEND
CL ELEV =47.32'
STA=43+49.75
6" TRANSITION CPLG

CONNECT TO EXIST
CL ELEV =51.66'
STA=39+91.98
12" 45° BEND
CL ELEV =47.30'
STA=43+35.59
12" 45° BEND
CL ELEV =51.40'
STA=43+37.68
12" x 6" REDUCER
CL ELEV =51.65'

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL
EXIST
6" FH SERVICE
(TO BE REMOVED)
INV=UNK
CONSTRUCT 388 LF
12" PVC C900
STA=39+76.21
12" GV
CL ELEV = 47.30'
STA=39+81.20
12" GV
CL ELEV = 47.30'

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
STA 39+73.50
MAR
S = 0.0131

RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS
PER DETAIL 11/C-20
S = 0.0000
S = 0.0005
STA 39+83.50
MAR
S = 0.0004
S = 0.0005
S = 0.0199
CONSTRUCT 12 LF
6" PVC C900

PIPE DATA TABLE

SEGMENT
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
LENGTH
2539.54'

14.22'
313.14'

16.26'

21.91'

BEARING
S30° 03' 09"E
S14° 56' 49"W
S30° 03' 06"E
S13° 07' 06"W
S35° 25' 11"E

POTHOLE TABLE
NAME
PH5
PH6

DESCRIPTION
T-3.54 B-4.18 6IN ACP WM
B-7.02 DRY HOLE 6IN ACP WM

ELEVATION

51.20 56.30

NORTHING
1991340.16
1991017.51

EASTING
6230698.16
6230836.60

KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

CARLSBAD BLVD
MATCH LINE STA 39+50 SEE DWG C-06

THIS SHEET
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

KEY NOTES:
#

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

16. ALL EXISTING UTILITY PIPE SIZES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL

BE ENTIRELY FILLED BY PRESSURE GROUTING PER
SPECIFICATION 15000.

5. INSTALL NEW FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-17.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

27. INSTALL NEW MANUAL AIR RELEASE VALVE PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

6. INSTALL NEW FITTING. SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.

8. FOR BIDDING PURPOSES, ALL TRENCH REPAIR SECTIONS

FOR MAIN AND SERVICE PIPING WITHIN CARLSBAD

BOULEVARD SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE A MINIMUM OF
10-INCH AC OVER 6-INCH CONCRETE. ACTUAL SECTIONS

ARE KNOWN TO VARY ALONG THE ALIGNMENT AND SHOULD

BE REPLACED IN KIND PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD
DRAWING GS-26 (MODIFIED). SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

36. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE WHITE TRAFFIC

STRIPES/ARROWS/CROSSWALKS IN KIND TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

37. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE YELLOW/DOUBLE YELLOW
IN KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

43. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 18-INCHES MINIMUM

VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER PIPE FOR
GAS SVC 3-INCHES AND LARGER.

46. REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE GUTTER JOINT TO
JOINT PER SDRSD G-11 AND G-12.
# KEY NOTES (CONT'D):

PLAN

PROFILE

MANZANO
DR
1 5'
2 5
16 EXISTING CURB FACE

EXISTING EOP
SCALE: 1" = 20'
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'

FUTURE CURB

FACE BY OTHERS

FUTURE CURB

FACE BY OTHERS
VARIES
3 16
1 EXISTING OVERHEAD

LINES TO BE

UNDERGROUNDED BY

OTHERS (FUTURE)

EXISTING 6" AC WATER
5'
REMOVE

INTERFERING

PORTIONS OF PIPE

AS REQUIRED
L5

MAINTAIN PEDESTRIAN ACCESS

TO COASTAL BLUFF TRAILS

MAINTAIN PEDESTRIAN ACCESS

TO COASTAL BLUFF TRAILS

SLURRY SEAL ENTIRE LANE WIDTH
300'±
36 36
37 36
43 46
SEE SHEET C-11 FOR

PROFILE
GD
JM
AF
C-07
10 CIVIL

CARLSBAD BLVD WATERLINE
STA 39+50 TO STA 43+26

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
(HORIZ)
(VERT)
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:31:39-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
s
s
s
FH
s
V
V
s
s s
V
s
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊◊
◊ ◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
◊◊◊◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
55 60
55 55
50 60
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Grou
nd Obscured
Grou
nd Obscured
6'
79'
ROW
79'
ROW
PH2A
PH2B
PH8
PH7
PH9
PH10
PH11

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
W
W

11.25° BEND AND

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
STA=50+04.67
N=1993546.32
E=6229370.91
Δ=3.86° L
W
W
25 ARV
STA=53+28.75
N=1993670.35
E=6229670.30
L10 L11 L12 L13
STA=60+05.03
N=1993667.30
E=6229675.71
STA=60+48.09
N=1993630.31
E=6229697.73
6 STA=50+00.00

CANNON RD WATER LINE
EQUALS
STA=13+79.45

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER LINE
N=1993544.35
E=6229366.68
12" x 12" TEE
12" GV (3)
6 8
STA=53+32.70

CANNON RD WATER LINE
EQUALS
STA=60+00.00

LOS ROBLES DR LINE
N=1993672.00
E=6229673.89
TIE INTO EXISTING 6" AC WATER

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
STA=53+02.40
N=1993659.26
E=6229646.40
Δ=2.23° L
6 HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
STA=53+37.32
N=1993673.86
E=6229678.12
Δ=0.66° R
6 STA=53+25.73 -19.58' LT

CANNON RD WATER LINE
EQUALS
STA=103+12.94

CANNON RD CL
N=1993686.89
E=6229659.41

EQUATION

W W WWW
STA=50+12.02 -20.00' LT

CANNON RD WATER LINE
EQUALS
STA=100+00.00

CANNON RD CL
N=1993567.42
E=6229370.18

EQUATION
8 C-19
M
4 50+00
51+00
52+00
53+00
54+00
55+00
BO
STA=50+05.25
N=1993546.55
E=6229371.45
28 MAR
STA=53+40.00
N=1993674.80
E=6229680.63
27 M
W WW
34 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
34 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
49+80 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 55+00
STA=53+32.70

CANNON RD LINE
EQUALS
STA=150.00

LOS ROBLES DR LINE
12" x 8" TEE
CL ELEV =52.10'
STA=50+00.00

CANNON RD LINE
EQUALS
STA=13+87.90

CARLSBAD BLVD LINE
12" TEE
CL ELEV =43.54'
STA=50+03.44

11.25° BEND
CL ELEV =43.54'
STA=50+04.67

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =43.47'
Δ=0.00° (VERT)
STA=53+02.40

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =51.84'
Δ=0.00° (VERT)
STA=53+37.32

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =52.10'
Δ=0.07° (VERT)
STA=54+01.50

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =52.00'
Δ=1.24° (VERT)
STA=54+80.46

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =50.90'
Δ=1.54° (VERT)

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL
EXIST
30" SD
INV=35.1±
EXIST
2" G
INV=45.0±
EXIST
1/2" G
INV=UNK
EXIST
1 1/2" G
INV=54.4±
EXIST
18" SD
INV=48.2±
EXIST
18" SD
INV=48.4±
EXIST
COM
INV=52.4±
EXIST

1.5" TS
INV=45.0±
STA=53+30.29
12" GV
CL ELEV = 52.10'
CONSTRUCT 440 LF
12" PVC C900

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
STA=53+35.14
12" GV
CL ELEV = 52.10'
STA 53+28.75
ARV
CONSTRUCT 54.64 LF
24" STEEL CASING VIA

OPEN TRENCH METHOD
PROPOSED 10" SEWER CROSSING
NOT SHOWN AT INV ELEV = 26.27

EXISTING SEWER CROSSING
NOT SHOWN AT INV ELEV = 25.33
S = 0.0094
S = 0.0409
EXIST
2" ENC E
INV=54.0±
EXIST
2" ENC E
INV=54.0±
S = 0.0013 S = 0.0139
S = 0.0408
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' MIN
(TYP)
1' CLR
(MIN)
S = 0.0048
6" SS

INV UNK
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
STA 50+05.25
BO
STA 53+40.00
MAR
EXIST

LOOP DETECTOR
INV=UNK
EXIST
E
INV=UNK
EXIST
2" E
INV=52.8±
EXIST
2" E
INV=52.8±
STA=50+01.88
12" GV
CL ELEV = 43.51'
S = 0.0315
S = 0.0013
S = 0.0564
STA=51+20.00

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =47.25'
Δ=0.84° (VERT)
STA=52+00.00

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =50.50'
Δ=0.57° (VERT)
STA=52+40.00

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =51.75'
Δ=1.66° (VERT)
1' CLR
(MIN)
STA=50+69.93
12" 11.25° BEND (VERT)
CL ELEV =43.15'
Δ=11.25° (VERT)
STA=50+79.23
12" 11.25° BEND (VERT)
CL ELEV =45.00'
Δ=11.25° (VERT)
S = 0.1983
EXIST
6" W
INV=43.2±
TO BE

ABANDONED
EXIST
12" W
INV=43.0±
TO BE

ABANDONED
CONSTRUCT 60 LF
12" FPVC

PIPE DATA TABLE

SEGMENT
L10
L11
L12
L13
LENGTH
306.93'

33.19'

5.12'
272.21'

BEARING
N67° 38' 41"E
N65° 24' 43"E
N67° 55' 32"E
N67° 42' 54"E

POTHOLE TABLE
NAME
PH2A
PH2B
PH7
PH8
PH9
PH10
PH11

DESCRIPTION
T-0.44 B-1.50 COM ELEC
T-1.61 B-5.02 COM ELEC
T-2.69 B-2.88 2IN HP GAS MAG NAIL
T-1.08 ELEC MAG NAIL
T-4.87 SDGE DB MAG NAIL
B-5.66 DRY HOLE TOP ASPH
MAG NAIL T-1.24 ELEC ENCASEMENT

ELEVATION

48.15 47.96

47.88 54.36

56.90 56.98

55.50 NORTHING
1993514.32
1993516.50
1993582.13
1993613.07
1993665.87
1993625.75
1993720.12

EASTING
6229367.84
6229366.84
6229409.06
6229549.83
6229682.33
6229703.67
6229790.40

KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

CARLSBAD BLVD
LOS
ROBLES
DR

THIS SHEET
MATCH LINE STA 55+00 SEE DWG C-09

CANNON RD
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.
# KEY NOTES:

4. INSTALL NEW GATE VALVE PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO.

W-21. SIZE AND QTY PER PLAN.

6. INSTALL NEW FITTING. SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN.

8. INSTALL THRUST BLOCK PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-19,
SEE DETAIL 12/C-21 FOR THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREAS.

5. INSTALL NEW FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-17.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

9. CONSTRUCT NEW COPPER TUBING WATER SERVICE
LATERAL PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-3 AND CITY OF
CARLSBAD STD DWG. NO. GS-25. PROVIDE NEW WATER

METER BOX AS SHOWN BEHIND FUTURE BACK OF WALK,
OUT OF DW. FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL PRIVATE SERVICE

PIPING AND APPURTENANCES TO FIELD ROUTE FROM NEW
METER TO EXISTING METER CONNECTION. CONTRACTOR

TO FIELD VERIFY BUILDINGS WITH EXISTING FIRE
SPRINKLERS. REPLACE WITH BACKFLOW PER CMWD DWG.

NO. W-5, AS NEEDED, FOR SERVICES WITH FIRE SPRINKLER
SYSTEM.

16. ALL EXISTING UTILITY PIPE SIZES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL

BE ENTIRELY FILLED BY PRESSURE GROUTING PER
SPECIFICATION 15000.

19. CONSTRUCT NEW 12-INCH FPVC WITHIN 24-INCH STEEL
CASING VIA OPEN TRENCH METHOD. SEE SPECIFICATIONS
SECTION 15065.

21. REMOVE EXISTING 10-INCH ACP WATERLINE PER
SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 01354.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

28. INSTALL NEW 2-INCH BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.

37. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE YELLOW/DOUBLE YELLOW
IN KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

KEY NOTES (CONT'D):
#
# KEY NOTES (CONT'D):

36. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE WHITE TRAFFIC

STRIPES/ARROWS/CROSSWALKS IN KIND TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

41. PROTECT IN PLACE EUG. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM
VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER PIPE.

42. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM

VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER PIPE FOR
GAS SVC 2-INCHES AND SMALLER.

46. REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE GUTTER JOINT TO
JOINT PER SDRSD G-11 AND G-12.

47. PROVIDE HIGHLINE BYPASS TO MAINTAIN WATER
SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION.

25. CONSTRUCT AIR VACUUM ASSEMBLY PER CMWD DWG W-11.

26. INSTALL TEMPORARY HIGHLINE TO KEEP EXISTING WATER

SERVICE TO SDGE FACILITY PER SPECIFICATION SECTION
15000. COORDINATE WITH CMWD AND SDGE FOR
APPROVAL OF WORK PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

27. INSTALL NEW MANUAL AIR RELEASE VALVE PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

KEY NOTES (CONT'D):
#

45. PROTECT IN PLACE EUG. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM
RADIAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER METER.

PLAN

PROFILE

FOR WATER

IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-01
5 FOR SEWER IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-12
3 2
19 9
21 FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS

FUTURE CURB FACE BY OTHERS

4.67'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'

EXISTING CURB FACE

EXISTING

CURB FACE
10'
SEE SHEET C-11

FOR PROFILE

FOR SEWER IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-12

FOR WATER

IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-01
16 16
16 20.31'
16 1
1 21
26 11.04'

7.39°
EXISTING 6" AC WATER
2"
16 1

COASTAL JURISDICTION

CITY JURISDICTION
9 WARNING!!

EXISTING HIGH PRESSURE

GAS LINE TO REMAIN IN
PLACE. ANY WORK IN GAS

EASEMENT SHALL BE PER SDG&E

NOTES IN GENERAL NOTES
36 36
37 36
36 36
36 36
41 9
47 36
41 41
42 42
47 41
42 46
MAINTAIN 1' HORIZ CLEARANCE

FROM TRENCH TO HAND HOLE
45 GD
JM
AF
C-08
11 CIVIL

CANNON RD WATERLINE
STA 50+00 TO STA 55+00

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
(HORIZ)
(VERT)
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:31:58-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
s
s
s
FH
V
V V
V
V
V V
s
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
X

X X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X

X X X X
X
X
X
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
35 4035
40 455050
4550
55 50
45 55

VARIESROW
VAR
IES
ROW

39.5'
42'
PH12 PH13
PH14

SSSSSSSSSSSS
W
W W
STA=70+37.17
N=1993782.27
E=6230057.08

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
STA=56+75.35
N=1993800.29
E=6229991.60
Δ=3.24° RT

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
STA=56+08.07
N=1993776.48
E=6229928.67
Δ=1.68° RT

W W W W W
L14
L16
L15
STA=70+07.84
N=1993811.34
E=6230053.21
STA=70+43.56
N=1993775.95
E=6230057.98
STA=57+37.46

CANNON RD WATER LINE
EQUALS
STA=70+00.00

EL ARBOL DR LINE
N=1993818.82
E=6230050.87
TIE INTO EXIST 6" AC WATER
6 6
W
9 C-20
55+00
56+00
57+00
58+00
59+00
60+00
MAR
STA=57+42.00
N=1993820.18
E=6230055.20
BO
STA=57+33.00
N=1993817.49
E=6230046.62
27 28

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
STA=58+16.72
N=1993844.23
E=6230125.95
Δ=3.24° RT
6 W
M
28 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
28 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 59+00 60+00 60+20
STA=57+37.46

CANNON RD LINE
EQUALS
STA=160+00.00

EL ARBOL DR LINE
12" x 8" TEE
CL ELEV =37.16'
STA=56+08.07

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =43.46'
Δ=0.05° (VERT)
STA=56+75.35

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =38.50'
Δ=3.56° (VERT)
STA=58+16.72

HIGH DEFLECTION
CPLG
CL ELEV =36.19'
Δ=0.08° (VERT)
STA=55+40.46

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =48.45'
Δ=1.89° (VERT)
STA=14+82.90

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =38.13'
Δ=1.63° (VERT)

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL
EXIST
1/2" G
INV=UNK
EXIST
ENC E
INV=44.9±
EXIST
COMM
INV=UNK
EXIST
8" S
INV=30.6±
EXIST
18" SD
INV=34.0±
EXIST
8" RW
INV=UNK
EXIST
1 1/2" G
INV=36.8±
EXIST

COMM UNK
INV=UNK
CONSTRUCT 520 LF
12" PVC C900
S = 0.0738
S = 0.0127
STA=57+40.22
12" GV
CL ELEV = 37.16'
STA=57+34.74
12" GV
CL ELEV = 37.16'

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
EXIST
3/4" CATV
INV=38.9±
S = 0.0026
EXIST

ENC COM
INV=39.2±
EXISTING 84" STORM DRAIN
NOT SHOWN AT INV ELEV = 19.51
S = 0.0409
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
STA 57+42.00
MAR
STA 57+33.00
BO
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
EXIST
1/2" G
INV=UNK
S = 0.0100
S = 0.0743
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
S = 0.0401

PIPE DATA TABLE

SEGMENT
L13
L14
L15
L16
LENGTH
272.21'

62.91'

75.44'
302.65'

BEARING
N67° 42' 54"E
N69° 23' 43"E
N72° 38' 02"E
N71° 11' 31"E

POTHOLE TABLE
NAME
PH12
PH13
PH14

DESCRIPTION
MAG NAI T-1.06 ELEC ENCASEMENT
MAG NAIL 10IN AC WAT T-3.48
MAG NAIL T-4.20 8IN AC WAT

ELEVATION

47.93 42.18

41.88 NORTHING
1993780.03
1993811.06
1993772.86

EASTING
6229939.49
6230025.02
6230058.39

KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH
EL
ARBOL
DR
MATCH LINE STA 60+20 SEE DWG C-10

CANNON RD
MATCH LINE STA 55+00 SEE DWG C-08

THIS SHEET
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

KEY NOTES:
#

6. INSTALL NEW FITTING. SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN.

5. INSTALL NEW FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-17.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

9. CONSTRUCT NEW COPPER TUBING WATER SERVICE
LATERAL PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-3 AND CITY OF
CARLSBAD STD DWG. NO. GS-25. PROVIDE NEW WATER

METER BOX AS SHOWN BEHIND FUTURE BACK OF WALK,
OUT OF DW. FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL PRIVATE SERVICE

PIPING AND APPURTENANCES TO FIELD ROUTE FROM NEW
METER TO EXISTING METER CONNECTION. CONTRACTOR

TO FIELD VERIFY BUILDINGS WITH EXISTING FIRE
SPRINKLERS. REPLACE WITH BACKFLOW PER CMWD DWG.

NO. W-5, AS NEEDED, FOR SERVICES WITH FIRE SPRINKLER
SYSTEM.

21. REMOVE EXISTING 10-INCH ACP WATERLINE PER
SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 01354.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

22. REMOVE EXISTING 12-INCH ACP WATERLINE PER
SPECIFICATIONS SECTIONS 02060 AND 02262.

16. ALL EXISTING UTILITY PIPE SIZES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL

BE ENTIRELY FILLED BY PRESSURE GROUTING PER
SPECIFICATION 15000.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

27. INSTALL NEW MANUAL AIR RELEASE VALVE PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.
# KEY NOTES (CONT'D):

42. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM

VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER PIPE FOR
GAS SVC 2-INCHES AND SMALLER.

43. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 18-INCHES MINIMUM

VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER PIPE FOR
GAS SVC 3-INCHES AND LARGER.

44. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM RADIAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER METER.

45. PROTECT IN PLACE EUG. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM
RADIAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER METER.

47. PROVIDE HIGHLINE BYPASS TO MAINTAIN WATER
SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION.

28. INSTALL NEW 2-INCH BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.
# KEY NOTES (CONT'D):

36. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE WHITE TRAFFIC

STRIPES/ARROWS/CROSSWALKS IN KIND TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

37. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE YELLOW/DOUBLE YELLOW
IN KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

41. PROTECT IN PLACE EUG. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM
VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER PIPE.

PROFILE
5 21

FOR SEWER IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-13
9 FUTURE CURB FACE BY
OTHERS
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'

EXISTING CURB
FACE

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS

EXISTING CURB FACE

FUTURE CURB FACE

BY OTHERS

EXISTING CURB FACE
1 SEE SHEET C-11

FOR PROFILE
16 1
22 PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'

19.97'

9.23'
L13
2 3

12.12'

EXISTING 6" AC WATER

REPLACE LATERAL

IN PLACE

COASTAL JURISDICTION

CITY JURISDICTION
36 36
36 36
37 36
47 44
42 41
41 MAINTAIN 1 FT HORIZONTAL

CLEARANCE FROM TRENCH

TO MANHOLE
41 42
9 45
36 47
GD
JM
AF
C-09
12 CIVIL

CANNON RD WATERLINE
STA 55+00 TO STA 60+20

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
(HORIZ)
(VERT)
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:32:15-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024

s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
V
V
V
V
V V
V
V
V
V

V V V
V V
V
V
V
s
s
s
s
s
s
◊
◊◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊
◊
X
X
X
X
X
XX
X
X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X
X
X
X
45 45
45 45
45 50
45 45
45 45
45 5045
45 45
45 4545
45 V
V
V
V

VARIESROW
102'ROW

HIGH DEFLECTION COUPLING
STA=60+53.44
N=1993920.38
E=6230350.08
Δ=6.07° L
6 22.5° BEND
STA=61+61.36
N=1993965.74
E=6230448.01
6 8

22.5° BEND
STA=61+86.65
N=1993984.35
E=6230465.14
6 8
45° BEND
STA=63+80.00
N=1994041.91
E=6230646.60
6 8
45° BEND
STA=63+84.11
N=1994045.70
E=6230648.14
6 8
12" x 8" TEE
STA=63+53.44
N=1994031.48
E=6230622.17
8 TIE INTO EXISTING 12" PVC WATER
STA=65+15.76
N=1994097.75
E=6230769.06
6 45° BEND
STA=63+11.30
N=1994015.13
E=6230583.31
8 6
8 6
W
W
18 18
W
W
L17
L21
L18
L19
L20
L22
MAR
STA=65+11.00
N=1994095.91
E=6230764.67
27 BLOW OFF
STA=63+46.41
N=1994028.82
E=6230615.66
25 W W W
CAP EXISTING 12" PVC

WATER AND ABANDON
IN PLACE. FILL WITH SLURRY

PER SPECIFICATIONS
CAP EXISTING 12" AC

WATER AND ABANDON
IN PLACE. FILL WITH SLURRY

PER SPECIFICATIONS
ARV
STA=63+37.22
N=1994025.23
E=6230607.20
10 C-20
28 45° BEND
STA=62+99.72
N=1994019.52
E=6230572.60

BLOW OFF
STA=61+89.49
N=1993985.23
E=6230467.84
29 HIGH DEFLECTION COUPLING
STA=63+40.38
N=1994026.46
E=6230610.11
6 BLOWOFF
STA=63+57.50
N=1994033.13
E=6230625.88
28 61+00
62+00
63+00
64+00
65+00
PH16A
PH17
PH18
PH19
PH20
PH21
24 28
32 36
40 44
48 52
24 28
32 36
40 44
48 52
60+20 61+00 62+00 63+00 64+00 65+00 65+40
STA=63+53.44
12" TEE
CL ELEV =40.40'
STA=61+61.36
12" 22.5° BEND (HORIZ)
CL ELEV =36.95'
STA=63+80.00
12" 45° BEND (HORIZ)
CL ELEV =40.52'
STA=65+21.24
EXIST 12" CROSS
CL ELEV =41.22'
EXIST
SD
INV=27.9±
EXIST

SDG&E ENCASEMENT
BOTT=42.0±
EXIST
2" W
INV=39.6±
EXIST
2" G
INV=UNK
EXIST
8" W
INV=UNK
EXIST
18" SD
INV=35.2±
EXIST
COM
INV=UNK
EXIST
12" RW
INV=33.8±
EXIST
36" FM
INV=23.8±
EXIST
E
INV=UNK
CONSTRUCT 219 LF
12" PVC C900
STA=63+51.15
12" GV
CL ELEV = 40.40'
STA=63+55.73
12" GV
CL ELEV = 40.40'

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
100' NCTD
ROW

PROTECT EXISTING
12" PVC PIPE
CONSTRUCT 34 LF
12" PVC C900
CONSTRUCT 103' LF 24" STEEL CASING

VIA PIPE RAM METHOD
EXIST
42" S
INV=35.4±
S = 0.0026
S = 0.0052
EXIST
8" S
INV=38.6±
STA=65+23.74
EXIST 12" GV
CL ELEV = 41.22'
EXIST
2" W
INV=UNK
UNK W

INV UNK
STA 65+11.00
MAR
STA 63+37.22
ARV

RAILROAD MAST

AND FND
(FOREGROUND)

RAILROAD MAST

AND FND
(BACKGROUND)

NCTD REQ'D

5.5' CLR (MIN)
EXIST 54" SDCWA (WATER) PIPELINE NOT
SHOWN AT INV=14.78
EXIST

1.5" FO
INV=UNK
S = 0.0726
STA 63+46.41
CL ELEV = 40.63
BO
S = 0.0050
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)
STA=65+18.99
EXIST 12" GV
CL ELEV = 41.22'
STA 63+57.50
CL ELEV = 40.96
BO
EXIST

LOOP DETECTOR
INV=UNK
EXIST
NCTD

CONDUIT
INV=UNK
EXIST
E
INV=UNK
EXIST
E
INV=40.7±
EXIST
E
INV=UNK
EXIST
12" HP G
INV=41.3±
S = 0.0019 S = 0.0590
S = 0.0058
S = 0.3343
S = 0.0001
STA=60+53.44

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =36.80'
Δ=0.05°
STA=61+86.65
12" 22.5° BEND (HORIZ)
CL ELEV =35.51'
STA=62+99.72
12" 45° BEND (HORIZ)
CL ELEV =36.17'
STA=63+11.30
12" 45° BEND (HORIZ)
CL ELEV =39.70'
STA=63+84.11
12" 45° BEND (HORIZ)
CL ELEV =40.54'
Δ=0.06°

RECEIVING PIT

JACKING PIT
1' CLR
(MIN)
STA=63+40.38

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =39.70'
Δ=3.62°
CONSTRUCT 25 LF
12" PVC C900
CONSTRUCT 113 LF
12" FPVC
1' CLR
(MIN)
1' CLR
(MIN)

PIPE DATA TABLE

SEGMENT
L16
L17
L18
LENGTH
302.65'

25.29'
113.07'

BEARING
N71° 11' 31"E
N42° 38' 36"E
N71° 52' 23"E

PIPE DATA TABLE

SEGMENT
L19
L20
L21
L22
LENGTH

11.62'

68.68'

4.08'
148.03'

BEARING
S67° 55' 25"E
N67° 04' 29"E
N21° 43' 59"E
N66° 45' 01"E

POTHOLE TABLE
NAME
PH16A
PH17
PH18
PH19
PH20
PH21

DESCRIPTION
TOP ASPH 8IN SEW FM B-10.00 DRY HOLE
MAG NAIL SDGE DB T-4.64
TOP ASPH 30IN RCP SD B-12.00 DRY HOLE
MAG NAIL T-0.50 SDGE DB
TOP ASPH 12IN HP GAS B-7.94 DRY HOLE
MAG NAIL COMM LINE T-2.86 B-4.48

ELEVATION

44.52 44.70

44.98 45.03

44.83 44.91

NORTHING
1993991.61
1993987.10
1994012.22
1994013.42
1994017.75
1994045.14

EASTING
6230460.21
6230480.56
6230591.77
6230586.94
6230594.53
6230594.31

KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

CANNON RD
MATCH LINE STA 60+20 SEE DWG C-09

THIS SHEET
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

KEY NOTES:

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.
#

6. INSTALL NEW FITTING. SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN.

8. INSTALL THRUST BLOCK PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-19,
SEE DETAIL 12/C-21 FOR THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREAS.

16. ALL EXISTING UTILITY PIPE SIZES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL

BE ENTIRELY FILLED BY PRESSURE GROUTING PER
SPECIFICATION 15000.

18. CONNECT TO EXISTING 12-INCH PVC WITH RESTRAINED
TRANSITION COUPLING.

22. REMOVE EXISTING 12-INCH ACP WATERLINE PER
SPECIFICATIONS SECTIONS 02060 AND 02262.

23. CONSTRUCT 12-INCH FPVC PIPE WITHIN 24-INCH STEEL

CASING VIA PIPE RAM METHOD PER SPECIFICATION
SECTIONS 15065 AND 02445 AND DETAIL 14 SHEET 19.

PROVIDE SETTLEMENT MONITORING PER DETAIL 16 SHEET
24 AND SPECIFICATION SECTION 02471.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

27. INSTALL NEW MANUAL AIR RELEASE VALVE PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

25. CONSTRUCT AIR VACUUM ASSEMBLY PER CMWD DWG W-11.

34. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR TEMPORARY SHUTDOWN
REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION.

33. EXISTING CURB MEDIAN AND SURFACE TO BE RESTORED
PER CITY STD DWG GS-18.

32. PROTECT RR MAST IN PLACE. AT GRADE CROSSING TO BE
MAINTAINED AT ALL TIME AS REQUIRED BY NCTD.

30. CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE ALL LOOP DETECTOR SYSTEM IN
KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

28. INSTALL NEW 2-INCH BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

35. REFER TO NCTD GENERAL NOTES ON SHEET 2.

29. REMOVE EXISTING 8-INCH ACP WATERLINE PER
SPECIFICATIONS SECTIONS 02060 AND 02262.

38. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING SLURRY
BACKFILL. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY. SAW CUT AND
REMOVE THE SLURRY IF REQUIRED. USE OF ROCK
BREAKING TOOLS IS NOT ALLOWED FOR SLURRY REMOVAL.

USE OF ANY VIBRATORY ROLLER TO COMPACT TRENCH
REFILL WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE CENTERLINE OF SDCWA
PIPELINE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.

KEY NOTES (CONT'D):
#
# KEY NOTES (CONT'D):

36. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE WHITE TRAFFIC

STRIPES/ARROWS/CROSSWALKS IN KIND TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

41. PROTECT IN PLACE EUG. MAINTAIN 12-INCHES MINIMUM
VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER PIPE.

43. PROTECT IN PLACE GAS SVC. MAINTAIN 18-INCHES MINIMUM

VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED WATER PIPE FOR
GAS SVC 3-INCHES AND LARGER.

37. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE YELLOW/DOUBLE YELLOW
IN KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

PLAN

PROFILE

AVENIDA

ENCINAS
100' NCTD
ROW

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS
ABANDONED 30" STEEL
CASING PER DWG 508-6

JACKING PIT
16 RECEIVING PIT
23 EXISTING 20" STEEL CASING
PER RECORD DWG 159-10A
16 16
SCALE: 1" = 20'
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'

FUTURE CURB FACE

BY OTHERS

EXISTING CURB FACE
PROTECT EXISTING 12" PVC PIPE
22 1
12'
12'
12'
36'

6.21'
2 29
L16

EXISTING CURB FACE

REMOVE EXIST
VALVE

SDCWA PIPELINE

CROSSING
1 PROTECT IN PLACE

EXIST WATER SERVICE

EX D/W

EXIST METER BOXES IN THIS AREA SHALL

BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF
EXIST 10" W (ABANDONED)

COASTAL JURISDICTION

CITY JURISDICTION
34 CAUTION:

HIGH PRESSURE GAS.

REFER TO SO CAL

GAS REQUIREMENTS
32 32
32 33
30 35
38 REMOVE AND RECONNECT WITH NEW SERVICE, SEE
DETAIL 15 SHEET 24 FOR CONNECTION DETAILS
36 36
36 37
36 36
36 WARNING!!

EXISTING HIGH PRESSURE

GAS LINE TO REMAIN IN
PLACE. ANY WORK IN GAS

EASEMENT SHALL BE PER SDG&E

NOTES IN GENERAL NOTES

NCTD CONDUIT

NCTD CONDUIT
43 41
41 41
GD
JM
AF
C-10
13 CIVIL

CANNON RD WATERLINE
STA 60+20 TO STA 65+40

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
(HORIZ)
(VERT)
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:32:37-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
24 28
32 36
40 44
48 52
24 28
32 36
40 44
48 52
19+80 20+00 21+00 21+20
STA=20+00.00

TIERRA DE ORO ST LINE
EQUALS
STA=10+00.00

CARLSBAD BLVD LINE
12" x 8" TEE
CL ELEV =41.15'
STA=21+00.37
8" TRANSITION CPLG
TOP ELEV = 40.88'

TIE INTO EXISTING
STA=20+45.64
8" 11.25° BEND (HORIZ)
TOP ELEV = 41.40'
CONSTRUCT 100 LF 8" PVC C900

RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS
S = 0.0088
S = 0.0088
S = 0.0056

EXIST GRADE

AT PIPE CL

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
EXIST
30" SD
INV=32.4±
STA 20+05.00
MAR
1' CLR
(MIN)
STA=20+03.00
8"GV
CL ELEV = 41.14'
EXIST
E
INV=37.6±
EXIST
E
INV=37.6±
EXIST
8" W
TO BE

ABANDONDED
INV=42.1±
EXIST
COM
INV=42.6±
1' CLR
(MIN)
28 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
28 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
29+80 30+00 30+60
STA=30+00.00

SHORE DR NOTRH LINE
EQUALS
STA=15+96.47

CARLSBAD BLVD LINE
12" x 8" TEE
CL ELEV =46.30'
STA=30+30.14
8" TRANSITION CPLG
CL ELEV =45.24'

TIE INTO EXISTING
CONSTRUCT 30 LF
8" PVC C900

RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS
EXIST

UNK COM
INV=UNK
STA=30+02.34
8" GV
CL ELEV = 46.25'
S = 0.0358

EXIST GRADE

AT PIPE CL

3.5' MIN
(TYP)EXIST
6" SWR
INV=37.9±
STA 30+04.00
BO
EXIST
6" W
TO BE

ABANDONDED
INV=46.0±
32 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
32 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
39+80 40+00 40+60
STA=40+00.00

SHORE DR SOUTH LINE
EQUALS
STA=24+00.43

CARLSBAD BLVD LINE
12" x 8" TEE
CL ELEV =50.00'
STA=40+29.24
CPLG
CL ELEV =49.68'

TIE INTO EXISTING
CONSTRUCT 29 LF
8" PVC C900

RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS
EXIST

UNK COM
INV=UNK
EXIST
UNK E
INV=UNK
EXIST
CATV
INV=UNK
S = 0.0114

EXIST GRADE

AT PIPE CL
STA=40+02.50
8" GV
CL ELEV = 50.00'

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
STA 40+05.00
MAR
EXIST
6" W
TO BE

ABANDONDED
INV=50.5±
36 40
44 48
52 56
60 64
36 40
44 48
52 56
60 64
59+80 60+00 60+80
STA=60+00.00

LOS ROBLES DR LINE
EQUALS
STA=53+32.61

CANNON RD LINE
12" x 8" TEE
CL ELEV =52.10'
STA=60+05.03
8" 11.25° BEND (HORIZ)
CL ELEV =53.08'
STA=60+48.09
8" x 6" TEE
CL ELEV =53.10'
STA=60+50.09
8" 22.5° BEND (HORIZ)
CL ELEV =53.10'
STA=60+65.50
6" 22.5° BEND (HORIZ)
CL ELEV =53.17'
STA=60+64.00
8" x 6" REDUCER
(RESTRAINED)
CL ELEV =53.15'
STA=60+71.50
6" TRANSITION CPLG
CL ELEV =53.18'

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL
STA=60+02.49
8" GV
CL ELEV = 52.55'
S = 0.0004

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
CONSTRUCT 64 LF
8" PVC C900

RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS
EXIST
COMM
INV=UNK
EXIST
18" SD
INV=49.9±
1' CLR
(MIN)
S = 0.0025
S = 0.0025
EXIST
E
INV=51.4±
1' CLR
(MIN)
CONSTRUCT 6 LF
6" PVC C900

RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS
20 24
28 32
36 40
44 48
20 24
28 32
36 40
44 48
69+80 70+00 70+80
STA=70+00.00

EL ARBOL DR LINE
EQUALS
STA=57+37.46

CANNON RD LINE
12" x 8" TEE
CL ELEV =37.16'
STA=70+07.84
8" 22.5° BEND (HORIZ)
CL ELEV =37.16'
STA=70+37.17
8" x 6" TEE
CL ELEV =37.29'
STA=70+43.56
8" x 6" REDUCER
CL ELEV =37.35'
STA=70+52.57
6" TRANSITION CPLG
CL ELEV =37.38'

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL
STA=70+02.64
8" GV
CL ELEV = 37.16'
S = 0.0000
S = 0.0064

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
CONSTRUCT 44 LF
8" PVC C900

RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS
EXIST
COM
INV=UNK
EXIST
E
INV=UNK
S = 0.0006
S = 0.0045
CONSTRUCT 9 LF
6" PVC C900

RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS
32 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
32 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
49+80 50+00 50+80

EXIST GRADE

AT PIPE CL
S = 0.0256
EXIST
6" AC WATER

TO BE ABANDONED
INV=46.6±
EXIST
8" SWR
INV=44.8±
EXIST
G
INV=48.0±
STA=50+00.00
MANZANO DR. LINE
EQUALS
STA=39+78.71

CARLSBAD BLVD LINE
12" x 8" TEE
CL ELEV =47.30'
STA=50+02.45
8" GV
CL ELEV = 47.30'
STA=50+32.95

HIGH DEFLECTION CPLG
CL ELEV =46.52'
Δ=3.10° (VERT)
S = 0.0333
STA=50+48.89
8" x 6" TEE
CL ELEV =47.00'
STA=50+51.04
8" x 4" REDUCER
CL ELEV =47.12'
STA=50+58.89
4" TRANSITION CPLG
CL ELEV =47.48'±
S = 0.0309

3.5' MIN
(TYP)
1' CLR
(MIN)
CONSTRUCT 49 LF
8" PVC C900

RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS
CONSTRUCT 10 LF
4" PVC C900

RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS
1' CLR
(MIN)
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.

PROFILE
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'

PROFILE
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'
(HORIZ)
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
(VERT)

SHORE DR SOUTH

LOS ROBLES DR EL ARBOL DR

SHORE DR NORTH
SHEET C-02

TIERRA DE ORO ST
SHEET C-01 SHEET C-03
SHEET C-08 SHEET C-09

PROFILE
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'

MANZANO RD
SHEET C-07

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
GD
JM
AF
C-11
14 CIVIL

MISC PROFILES
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:33:01-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024

20 24
28 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
60 20
24 28
32 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
19+80 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00

EX MH 27B-32
RIM=49.86
10" INV IN=26.82 (SW)
6" INV IN=43.13 (SE)
10" INV OUT=26.82 (NW)

EX MH 27B-59
RIM=48.60
10" INV IN=26.31 (SE)
10" INV OUT=26.00 (NE)
CONSTRUCT 194 LF
10" CIPP LINER
CONSTRUCT 286 LF
10" CIPP LINER
CONSTRUCT 20 LF
10" CIPP LINER

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL

EX MH 27B-31
RIM=57.28
10" INV IN=25.32 (SW)
6" INV IN=47.00 (SE)
10" INV OUT=25.24 (E)
EXIST
3/4" G
INV=UNK
EXIST
18" SD
INV=UNK
EXIST
COM
INV=UNK
EXIST
E
INV=UNK
EXIST
2" G
INV=45.0±
EXIST
1/2" G
INV=UNK
EXIST
1 1/2" G
INV=54.4±
S = 0.22%
PROPOSED 12" WATER
W/ 20" STEEL CASING
CL ELV=43.32
S = 0.24%
V V
V
V
V
s
s
s
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
X
X
X X X
◊◊◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
55 50
60 Ground O
bscured
Ground Obscured
6'
79'
ROW
23+00
24+00
25+00

SSSSSSSSSSSS
STA=24+80.80
N=1993676.76
E=6229658.14

EX MH 27B-31
W
20 WW
W WW
PH8
PH9
V V
V
V
V V
V
V
V V
ss
s
s
502248.92
X

X X X X X
X
X
◊◊
◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊
◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
X
X
X

X X X X X X X
X
X
◊
◊

XXXXXXXXXX
4545
45 505550
50 50
50 55
7'
7'
20+00
21+00
22+00
SS

SSSSSSSSSS
STA=20+00.00
N=1993397.63
E=6229491.79

EX MH 27B-32
STA=21+94.38
N=1993565.69
E=6229394.13

EX MH 27B-59
20 20
PH2A
PH2B
PH7

POTHOLE TABLE
NAME
PH2A
PH2B
PH7
PH8
PH9

DESCRIPTION
T-0.44 B-1.50 COM ELEC
T-1.61 B-5.02 COM ELEC
T-2.69 B-2.88 2IN HP GAS MAG NAIL
T-1.08 ELEC MAG NAIL
T-4.87 SDGE DB MAG NAIL

ELEVATION

48.15 47.96

47.88 54.36

56.90 NORTHING
1993514.32
1993516.50
1993582.13
1993613.07
1993665.87

EASTING
6229367.84
6229366.84
6229409.06
6229549.83
6229682.33

KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

THIS SHEET
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

MATCH LINE STA 25+00 SEE DWG C-13

CANNON RD

MATCH LINE SEE LEFT

MATCH LINE SEE RIGHT

CARLSBAD BLVD
KEY NOTES:
#

12. INSTALL 10-INCH CIPP LINER (CIPP OR SPIRAL WOUND
LINING PER 500-5.13 AND PER TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS).

20. REHABILITATE EXISTING MANHOLE WITH POLYMER INSERT
PER DETAIL 1/C-16.

15. INSTALL TOP HAT SEWER LATERAL CONNECTION PER
GREENBOOK SPECIFICATION SECTION 500-8.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.

36. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE WHITE TRAFFIC

STRIPES/ARROWS/CROSSWALKS IN KIND TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

37. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE YELLOW/DOUBLE YELLOW
IN KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

30. CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE ALL LOOP DETECTOR SYSTEM IN
KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

PLAN

PROFILE
PLAN
12 FOR WATER IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-08

FOR WATER

IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-01

FOR WATER

IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-01

FUTURE CURB FACE BY OTHERS

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS

CANNON RD

LOSROBLESDR
SCALE: 1" = 20'
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'
SCALE: 1" = 20'

FUTURE CURB

FACE BY OTHERS

EXISTING CURB FACE

FUTURE CURB

FACE BY OTHERS

EXISTING

CURB FACE

EXISTING EOP

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS

9.63'

20.11'
15 SHORE DR
NORTH

FUTURE CURB

FACE BY OTHERS

COASTAL JURISDICTION

CITY JURISDICTION

COASTAL JURISDICTION
36 37
37 36
30 12
36 W W W
15 12
15 W
W
W

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
GD
JM
AF
C-12
15 CIVIL

CANNON RD SEWER LINE
STA 20+00 TO STA 25+00(HORIZ)
(VERT)
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:33:23-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024

20 24
28 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
60 20
24 28
32 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL
CONSTRUCT 391 LF
10" CIPP LINER
28 LF
10" CIPP LINER
EXIST
2" ENC E
INV=54.0±

EX MH 27B-66
RIM=41.87
10" INV IN=23.86 (SW)
10" INV OUT=23.66 (N)
EXIST
E
INV=53.5±
EXIST
COM
INV=52.4±
EXIST
E
INV = UNK
EXIST
UNK W
INV = UNK
EXIST
1/2" G
INV = UNK

EX MH 27B-60
RIM=42.43
10" INV IN=24.35 (W)
8" INV IN=30.53 (E)
8" INV IN=30.53 (S)
10" INV OUT=24.29 (NE)
EXIST

ENC CATV
INV=53.7±
EXIST
2" G
INV=42.4±
EXIST
COMM
INV = UNK
EXIST
1 1/2" G
INV=36.8±
EXIST
3/4" CATV
INV = UNK
EXIST
8" W
INV=36.7±
EXIST
2" ENC E
INV=54.0±
EXIST
ENC E
INV=44.9±
EXIST
2" E
INV=51.6±
S = 0.22%
S = 1.48%
s
FH
V
V V
V
V
V V
V
V
V
FH
s
s
V
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
X

X X X X X
X
X
X
X
X

X X X X X X X
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
35 40
455050
455055
55 55
60 79'
ROW

VARIESROW

39.5'
42'
PH10
PH11 PH12 PH13
PH14
29+19.89
25+00
26+00
27+00
28+00
29+00

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
STA=28+91.02
N=1993832.76
E=6230037.54

EX MH 27B-60
STA=29+19.89
N=1993854.31
E=6230056.67

EX MH 27B-66
W
W W
20 W
STA=60+65.50
N=1993619.37
E=6229711.11
WW W W
W
M
M

POTHOLE TABLE
NAME
PH10
PH11
PH12
PH13
PH14

DESCRIPTION
B-5.66 DRY HOLE TOP ASPH
MAG NAIL T-1.24 ELEC ENCASEMENT
MAG NAI T-1.06 ELEC ENCASEMENT
MAG NAIL 10IN AC WAT T-3.48
MAG NAIL T-4.20 8IN AC WAT

ELEVATION

56.98 55.50

47.93 42.18

41.88 NORTHING
1993625.75
1993720.12
1993780.03
1993811.06
1993772.86

EASTING
6229703.67
6229790.40
6229939.49
6230025.02
6230058.39

KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH
(HORIZ)
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

CANNON RD
MATCH LINE STA 25+00 SEE DWG C-12
THIS
SHEET

LOSROBLES DR
#

12. INSTALL 10-INCH CIPP LINER (CIPP OR SPIRAL WOUND
LINING PER 500-5.13 AND PER TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS).

20. REHABILITATE EXISTING MANHOLE WITH POLYMER INSERT
PER DETAIL 1/C-16.

KEY NOTES:

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.

36. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE WHITE TRAFFIC

STRIPES/ARROWS/CROSSWALKS IN KIND TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

37. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE YELLOW/DOUBLE YELLOW
IN KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

PLAN

PROFILE
12 FUTURE CURB FACE BY OTHERS

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS

EL ARBOL DR
(VERT)
SCALE: 1" = 20'
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'

EXISTING CURB FACE

9.06'

FOR WATER IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-09
12 FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS

COASTAL JURISDICTION

CITY JURISDICTION
36 37
37 37
36 CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
GD
JM
AF
C-13
16 CIVIL

CANNON RD SEWER LINE
STA 25+00 TO STA 29+20
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:33:45-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
V V
X
X
X
X
XX
XX
◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊
◊◊◊◊◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
XX
X

XXXXXXX
X
X X
X
◊◊
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
◊
◊ ◊
◊◊
◊ ◊ ◊
55 55
50 50
55 55
55 55
MH?
1'
1'
1'
100'
ROW
30+00
31+00
32+00
33+00

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

W W W W W
20 STA=30+00.00
N=1992687.50
E=6229905.86

EX MH 27B-62

W W W W W W
32 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
32 36
40 44
48 52
56 60
29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL
CONSTRUCT 300 LF
8" PVC SDR 35

EX MH 27B-62
RIM=53.84
6" INV IN=44.40 (NW)
8" INV OUT=44.38 (SE)
S = 0.72%
EXIST
3/4" G
INV=UNK
EXIST
COM
INV=UNK
EXIST
E
INV=UNK
EXIST
1 1/2" G
INV=51.5±

KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH
MATCH LINE STA 33+00 SEE DWG C-15

CARLSBAD BLVD
SHORE
DR
SOUTH
THIS
SHEET
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

KEY NOTES:
#

13. RECONNECT EXISTING SEWER SERVICE PER CMWD STD
DWG NO. S-7. TESTING PER SPECIFICATION SECTION 15043.

14. CONSTRUCT NEW 8-INCH PVC SDR 35 SEWER LINE. PIPE
BEDDING AND TRENCH BACKFILL PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO.

S-5.

20. REHABILITATE EXISTING MANHOLE WITH POLYMER INSERT
PER DETAIL 1/C-16.

24. REMOVE EXISTING 6-INCH VCP SEWER PIPE.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.

36. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE WHITE TRAFFIC

STRIPES/ARROWS/CROSSWALKS IN KIND TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

49. PROTECT IN PLACE EUG.

PLAN

PROFILE
13 24

FOR WATER IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEET C-03 AND C-04

FUTURE CURB

FACE BY OTHERS

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS
13 13
13 EXISTING CURB FACE

EXISTING CURB FACE

FUTURE CURB FACE BY OTHERS

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS
SCALE: 1" = 20'
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'
14 23.05'

36 36
36 CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
GD
JM
AF
C-14
17 CIVIL

CARLSBAD BLVD SEWER LINE
STA 30+00 TO STA 33+00
49 (HORIZ)
(VERT)
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:34:08-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
s
ss
FH
s
s
s
s
s
s s
V V
501951.35
X
X
XX
XXXX
X X X
X
X
X
◊◊◊
◊
◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊◊◊◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊
◊◊
◊◊◊
◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊
◊
◊
◊ ◊
◊ ◊
◊
◊◊◊
55 55
55 50
55 50
50 5050
50 50
Ground
Obscur
ed
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
1'
100'
ROW
33+00
34+00
35+00
36+00

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
STA=33+15.99
N=1992413.99
E=6230064.12

EX MH 27D-16
W W W
W
STA=36+31.77
N=1992141.04
E=6230222.89

EX MH 27D-15
20 20

W W W W W
W W W
30 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
30 32
36 40
44 48
52 56
33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00

EXIST GRADE AT PIPE CL
CONSTRUCT 316 LF
8" PVC SDR 35

EX MH 27D-16
RIM=52.54
8" INV IN=42.11 (NW)
8" INV OUT=42.01 (SE)

EX MH 27D-15
RIM=51.43
8" INV IN=39.85 (NW)
8" INV IN=39.85 (SE)
8" INV OUT=39.85 (SW)
S = 0.68%
EXIST
1" G
INV=49.7±
EXIST
COM
INV=UNK
EXIST
E
INV=UNK
EXIST
SS UNK
INV=UNK
EXIST
18" SD
INV=43.6±
CONSTRUCT 16 LF 8" PVC SDR 35
S = 0.72%
FUTURE
18" RCP
INV=48.4±

KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

CARLSBAD BLVD
MATCH LINE STA 33+00 SEE DWG C-14
THIS
SHEET
8'4'0 2'
SCALE: 1" = 4'
40'20'0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

CEREZO
DR
KEY NOTES:
#

13. RECONNECT EXISTING SEWER SERVICE PER CMWD STD
DWG NO. S-7. TESTING PER SPECIFICATION SECTION 15043.

14. CONSTRUCT NEW 8-INCH PVC SDR 35 SEWER LINE. PIPE
BEDDING AND TRENCH BACKFILL PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO.

S-5.

20. REHABILITATE EXISTING MANHOLE WITH POLYMER INSERT
PER DETAIL 1/C-16.

24. REMOVE EXISTING 6-INCH VCP SEWER PIPE.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEGMENT LENGTHS SHOWN INDICATE HORIZONTAL

DISTANCES BETWEEN BENDS AND MAY EXTEND ONTO
MULTIPLE PAGES.

2. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING TO ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS. SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES ON SHEET
G-02.

3. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RESTRAINED JOINTS PER DETAIL
11/C-20 IN LIEU OF THRUST BLOCKS.

4. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS

WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PER

THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS.

5. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

6. MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND KEEP STREETS OPEN AT
ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE FLAGGERS

FOR VEHICLE ACCESS AS NEEDED, AND IN ACCORDANCE

WITH APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND TRAFFIC
CONTROL PLANS.

7. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SEWER LATERALS CALLED OUT ON
THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR

SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSE

OF COMPLETING THE NECESSARY WORK INCLUDED IN THIS
PROJECT. RECONNECT ALL SEWER LATERALS AND INSTALL
TOP HATS.

36. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE WHITE TRAFFIC

STRIPES/ARROWS/CROSSWALKS IN KIND TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

49. PROTECT IN PLACE EUG.

PLAN

PROFILE
13 24
13 13
13 13

EXISTING CURB FACE

FUTURE CURB FACE

BY OTHERS

FUTURE CURB FACE BY OTHERS

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS

EXISTING CURB FACE

FUTURE CURB FACE BY OTHERS

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS
SCALE: 1" = 20'
HORIZ SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERT SCALE: 1" = 4'

FUTURE ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS

FOR WATER IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEETS C-04 AND C-05
14 EXISTING 8-INCH

SEWER TO REMAIN
36 36
36 36
36 36

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 KEY MAP

MANZANO DR
AVENI
DA

ENCINAS

CANNON RD
CARL

SBAD BLVD

KEY MAP
NORTH

FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
GD
JM
AF
C-15
18 CIVIL

CARLSBAD BLVD SEWER LINE
STA 33+00 TO STA 36+32
49 (HORIZ)
(VERT)
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:34:30-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.
2 -
45"
41"
1 1/2" G
AP
SCALE:

DETAIL
SCALE:

DETAIL
GENERAL NOTES:

1. DRAWING IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR

SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION, DEPTH, AND WIDTH OF

EXISTING MANHOLES TO BE REHABILITATED PRIOR TO

ORDERING ANY MATERIALS AND ANY WORK BEING
PERFORMED.

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW CONFINED SPACE
PROCEDURES AT ALL TIMES.

SAWCUT AND REMOVE

EXISTING ASPHALT

REPLACE ASPHALT

INSTALL CAST IRON

MANHOLE FRAME

AND COVER PER
CMWD STD DWG S-4

REMOVE AND

DISPOSE OF EXISTING

MANHOLE RING AND
COVER

EXISTING CONE

EXISTING RISER

CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT

IN PLACE OR REMOVE AND

REPLACE IN KIND ANY UTILITIES

WITHIN THE EXCAVATION AREA

EXISTING RISER

REMOVE DIRT TO

EXPOSE EXISTING

MANHOLE CONE
REMOVE

EXISTING

MANHOLE
CONE

EXISTING PIPE

REPAIR EXISTING

BENCH, CHANNEL AND

PIPIE TO RECEIVE NEW

POLYMER MANHOLE

BASE RISER

EXISTING BASE

FILL ANNULAR
SPACE

BETWEEN THE

EXISTING AND

NEW MANHOLE

STRUCTURE

WITH SLURRY

INSTALL NEW POLYMER

CONCRETE MANHOLE

BASE RISER AS PER

MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS. CORE

DRILLING/CUTTING AND

LEVEL AS REQUIRED

EPOXY MORTAR COAT THE

BENCH AND CHANNEL OF
THE EXISTING MANHOLE.

EPOXY SHALL OVERLAP

THE FIRST RISER SECTION
BY 4-INCHES MINIMUM.

EPOXY SHALL BE PROVIDED

BY POLYMER CONCRETE

MANUFACTURER

EXISTING PIPE

EXISTING MANHOLE

NEW POLYMER

MANHOLE RISER INSERT

EPDM GASKET

OR MASTIC

OUTSIDE FACE OF POLMER

CONCRETE RISER INSERT

RISER ALIGNMENT
GUIDE

DOUBLE SIDED

MASTIC SEAL

EXISTING MANHOLE SECTION MANHOLE INSERT SECTION
36"

NEW POLYMER MANHOLE REHABILITATION STRUCTURE
DEPTH PER PLAN. SEE NOTE 1.
12" WIDE X 6" THICK CONCRETE
COLLAR, CLASS 560-C-3250 WITH 3"

ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY

INSTALL POLYMER

GRADE RINGS AS

REQUIRED

BACKFILL AND

RECOMPACT

INSTALL POLYMER

CONCRETE CONE

USING THE PROPER

ALIGNMENT GUIDES

AS REQUIRED BY

MANUFACTURER'S

INSTRUCTIONS
48"

EXTERNAL

JOINT WRAP

TOP VIEW
(TYP)
THRU C-15

FILL ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN

THE EXISTING AND NEW MANHOLE

STRUCTURE WITH SLURRY

CORE DRILL

EX MH 27B-60 8" INV IN=30.53 (E)
8" INV IN= 30.53 (S)

EX MH 27B-31 10" INV IN = 25.32

EX MH 27B-32 6" INV IN = 43.13

CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY
1 C-12 NO SCALE

MANHOLE POLYMER INSERT AND REHABILITATION
2 - NO SCALE

JOINT DETAIL

CARRIER PIPE SIZE
8-12" SPACER WIDTH

MIN THICKNESS
12"
*

CASING / CARRIER PIPE

0.375"

CASING ID
** CASING WALL THICKNESS TO BE VERIFIED BY

CONTRACTOR'S ENGINEER (LICENSED IN THE STATE

WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED) FOR MAXIMUM JACKING
LOADS AND PIPE BENDING.
24"
NOTES:

1. STEEL CASING PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A283, GRADE B, C, OR D.

ALL JOINTS SHALL BE WELDED. INTERIOR JOINTS SHALL BE GROUND TO SMOOTH FINISH. ALL WELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C206, "AWWA STANDARD FOR FIELD WELDING OF STEEL WATER PIPE." COATINGS FOR STEEL CASING ARE NOT REQUIRED.

2. CASING PIPE SHALL BE LAID TRUE TO LINE AND GRADE WITH NO BENDS OR CHANGES IN GRADE FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE CASING.

3. ADVANCE PRODUCTS AND SYSTEMS, INC., OR EQUAL, CASING SPACERS AND END SEALS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.

4. ALL PIPE JOINTS WITHIN THE CASING ARE TO BE FUSED.

5. ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN CARRIER PIPE AND CASING TO BE FILLED WITH CELLULAR GROUT PER THE SPECIFICATIONS.

6. CASINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED TO THE GRADE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, WITH A MAXIMUM VERTICAL DEVIATION OF +0" AND -2", AND A MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DEVIATION OF ±2" PROVIDED THE ALIGNMENT DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH OTHER UTILITIES AND/OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY.

7. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE LOCATION OF INTAKE AND DISCHARGE AIR VENTS.

BLOCK TO PREVENT

FLOTATION OF PIPE

THICKNESS

FILL ANNULAR
ON THE DRAWINGS.

CASING PIPE WITH
CARRIER PIPE. PIPE SIZE

AND TYPE AS INDICATED

FUSED PVC CARRIER PIPE OVER LAPPING

RUBBER SEAL
2'-0"
2'-0"

STAINLESS

STEEL CLAMP
BANDS

SPACING PER

MANUFACTURER

RECOMMENDATIONS

FUSE PVC PIPE JOINTS

WITHIN STEEL CASING CASING SPACERS

MINIMUM TWO PER PIPE JOINT

SPACE WITH

CELLULAR GROUT

CASING SPACER

0.375" MINIMUM WALL
MINIMUM 24" STEEL

STEEL CASING PIPE

LUBRICATE

BOTTOM OF CASING
2" AIR VENT W/ THREAD

CONNECTION OR CLAMP ON
(TYP) (SEE NOTE 7)
SCALE:

DETAIL14
- NO SCALE

AUGER BORE OR PIPE RAMMING STEEL CASING

NEW PIPE WILL REQUIRE CORE
DRILLING A LARGER HOLE 6" TO 8" PIPE.

INSTALL SANDED MANHOLE ADAPTER,
GPK OR APPROVED EQUAL.

GD
JM
AF
C-16
19 CIVIL
DETAILS 1

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:34:52-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024

s
s
s s
s
V
45 45
45 45
W
W
W
W
W
W
PH16A
PH17
PH18

10.12'

5.98'
10'
10'

CANNON RD
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.
100' NCTD
ROW

JACKING PIT

RECEIVING PIT

EX D/W

EX D/W
CAUTION:

HIGH PRESSURE GAS.

REFER TO SO CAL

GAS REQUIREMENTS
WARNING!!

EXISTING HIGH PRESSURE

GAS LINE TO REMAIN IN
PLACE. ANY WORK IN GAS

EASEMENT SHALL BE PER SDG&E

NOTES IN GENERAL NOTES
SCALE:

SETTLEMENT MONITORING DETAIL16
C-10 1" = 10'
33'

27.24'
LEGEND:

SETTLEMENT MONITORING LOCATION
EXISTING CARLSBAD BLVD PAVEMENT SECTION17
C-21 NO SCALE

NATIVE MATERIAL
6"
10"

ACCONCRETE
GD
JM
AF
C-17
20 CIVIL
DETAILS 2

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:35:11-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

SCALE:

CONNECTION DETAIL3
C-01 NO SCALE

CARLSBAD BLVD
SCALE:

CONNECTION DETAIL5
C-02 NO SCALE
KEY NOTES:
#

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

4. INSTALL NEW GATE VALVE PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO.

W-21. SIZE AND QTY PER PLAN.

16. ALL EXISTING UTILITY PIPE SIZES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL

BE ENTIRELY FILLED BY PRESSURE GROUTING PER
SPECIFICATION 15000.

6. INSTALL NEW FITTING. SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS WITHIN CONNECTION DETAILS,
EXCEPT PVC TO AC TRANSITION COUPLINGS.

28. INSTALL NEW 2-INCH BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

27. INSTALL NEW MANUAL AIR RELEASE VALVE PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

39. LOCATION OF NEW BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY APPLIES TO
SHORE DRIVE NORTH ONLY.

40. LOCATION OF NEW MANUAL AIR RELEASE VALVE APPLIES
TO SHORE DRIVE SOUTH ONLY.
1 2
2 1
1 4
4 4
4 16
EXISTING 8" PVC

WATER LINE

REMOVE AND SALVAGE

EXISTING VALVE
6 6
EXISTING 12" ACP WATER, FOR
CONTINUATION SEE SHEET C-01

FOR CONTINUATION
SEE SHEET C-01

TIERRA DEL ORO ST

CARLSBAD BLVDSHORE DR NORTH / SOUTH

FOR CONTINUATION SEE
SHEETS C-02 AND C-03

FOR CONTINUATION SEE
SHEETS C-02 AND C03
C-03
EXISTING 8" AC WATER LINE
(ABANDONED)
8" PVC

REMOVE EXISTING REDUCER
REMOVE EXISTING 8" PVC
REMOVE EXISTING 45° BEND
4 7'
(MIN)
SCALE:

CONNECTION DETAIL4
C-01 NO SCALE
2 8" GV (FLG x MJ)
12" x 8" TEE (FLG)
12" GV (FLG x MJ)
12" GV (FLG x MJ)
1 REMOVE EXISTING AC PIPE

TO NEAREST JOINT
12" GV (FLG x MJ)
12" GV (FLG x MJ)
8" GV (FLG x MJ)
4 EXISTING 8" PVC

WATER LINE

REMOVE AND SALVAGE

EXISTING VALVE

REMOVE EXISTING REDUCER

AND RESTRAINED FLANGED

COUPLING ADAPTER

REMOVE EXISTING TEE

AND THRUST BLOCK
EXISTING 6" AC WATER

LINE (ABANDONED)
8" DUCTILE IRON

TRANSITION COUPLING
16 12" x 8" TEE (FLG)
6 REMOVE EXISTING SPOOL
8" DUCTILE IRON

TRANSITION COUPLING
6 12" DUCTILE IRON

TRANSITION COUPLING
6 27
39 28
27 28
28 40
27 GD
JM
AF
C-18
21 CIVIL
CONNECTION DETAILS 1

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:35:31-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

SCALE:

CONNECTION DETAIL6
C-07 NO SCALE

CARLSBAD BLVD
SCALE:

CONNECTION DETAIL8
C-08 NO SCALE
KEY NOTES:
#

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

4. INSTALL NEW GATE VALVE PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO.

W-21. SIZE AND QTY PER PLAN.

16. ALL EXISTING UTILITY PIPE SIZES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL

BE ENTIRELY FILLED BY PRESSURE GROUTING PER
SPECIFICATION 15000.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

6. INSTALL NEW FITTING. SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS WITHIN CONNECTION DETAILS,
EXCEPT PVC TO AC TRANSITION COUPLINGS.

17. CONSTRUCT NEW 4-INCH DR18 C900 PVC WATERLINE WITH
LOCATING WIRE AND WARNING TAPE. TRENCH AND PIPE
ZONE PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-2.

28. INSTALL NEW 2-INCH BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

27. INSTALL NEW MANUAL AIR RELEASE VALVE PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

25. CONSTRUCT AIR VACUUM ASSEMBLY PER CMWD DWG W-11.
2 1
6 6
6 1
4 4
4 2
(TO FH, FOR

CONTINUATION
SEE SHEET C-07)

MANZANO DR
EXISTING 4" ACP

WATER LINE
4 4
6 6
6 6

CANNON RD LOS ROBLES DR
16 FOR CONTINUATION
SEE SHEET C-07

FOR CONTINUATION
SEE SHEET C-07

FOR CONTINUATION
SEE SHEET C-08
12" x 8" TEE (FLG)
1 12" GV
(FLG x MJ)
8" GV
(FLG x MJ)
6 12" x 8" REDUCER (FLG)
3 6" GV
(FLG x MJ)
8" x 6" TEE (FLG)
8" x 4" REDUCER (FLG)
4" TRANSITION

COUPLING,

REMOVE EXISTING

AC PIPE TO

NEAREST JOINT
7'
(MIN)
SCALE:

CONNECTION DETAIL7
C-07 NO SCALE
5'
(MIN)
EXISTING 6" ACP

WATER LINE
6 6" 22.5° BEND
(MJ x MJ)
8" x 6" REDUCER
(MJ x MJ)

22.5° BEND (FLG x MJ)
8" x 6" TEE (FLG)
6 8" 11.25° BEND (MJ x MJ)
8" GV (FLG x MJ)
12" x 8" TEE (FLG)
1 FOR CONTINUATION
SEE SHEET C-07
12" GV
(FLG x MJ)
8" RESTRAINED

FLANGED COUPLING

ADAPTER
4 6" GV (FLG x MJ)
EXISTING 6" AC

WATER LINE
6" TRANSITION

COUPLING, REMOVE

EXISTING AC PIPE TO

NEAREST JOINT
9'
(MIN)
6" WIDE RANGE RESTRAINED

FLANGED COUPLING ADAPTER,

ROMAC ALPHA FC OR APPROVED
EQUAL
EXISTING 6" AC WATER LINE,

REMOVE AS REQUIRED
(JOINT TO JOINT)
16 6
6 45° BEND (MJ x MJ)
NOTE:

CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE AND VERIFY EXISTING PIPE
CONNECTION LOCATION. TIE IN LOCATION SHOWN TO
EXISTING 6" AC PIPE IS APPROXIMATE ONLY.
3 4
12" GV
(FLG x MJ)
3 6

CARLSBAD BLVD
6 17
6 4" RESTRAINED

FLANGED COUPLING

ADAPTER
1 FOR CONTINUATION
SEE SHEET C-08
6" TRANSITION COUPLING,

REMOVE EXISTING AC

PIPE TO NEAREST JOINT
4 12" GV
(FLG x MJ)
27 28
27 25
12" 45° BEND (FLG x MJ)
6 12" x 6" REDUCER (FLG)
EXISTING 6" AC WATER LINE,

REMOVE AS REQUIRED
(JOINT TO JOINT)
16 CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
GD
JM
AF
C-19
22 CIVIL
CONNECTION DETAILS 2
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:35:51-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

SCALE:

CONNECTION DETAIL9
C-09 NO SCALE

CANNON RD
SCALE:

CONNECTION DETAIL10
C-10 NO SCALE

AVENIDA ENCINAS
KEY NOTES:
#

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

4. INSTALL NEW GATE VALVE PER CMWD STD. DWG. NO.

W-21. SIZE AND QTY PER PLAN.

16. ALL EXISTING UTILITY PIPE SIZES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL

BE ENTIRELY FILLED BY PRESSURE GROUTING PER
SPECIFICATION 15000.

SEE DETAIL 13 SHEET 24.

6. INSTALL NEW FITTING. SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN.

GENERAL NOTES:

1. RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS WITHIN CONNECTION DETAILS,
EXCEPT PVC TO AC TRANSITION COUPLINGS.

27. INSTALL NEW MANUAL AIR RELEASE VALVE PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.

28. INSTALL NEW 2-INCH BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY PER CMWD STD.

DWG. NO. W-10.
16 EXISTING 12" CROSS
EXISTING 12" x 10" REDUCER
EXISTING 10" GATE VALVE
EXISTING 12" x 10" REDUCER
EXISTING 10" GATE VALVE
EXISTING 12" GATE VALVE
EXISTING 12" GATE VALVE
EXISTING 10" AC WATER
EXISTING 10" PVC WATER
EXISTING 12" PVC WATER

EL ARBOL DR
6 1
4 4
6 6

FOR CONTINUATION
SEE SHEET C-09
4 3
6 2
12" x 8" TEE (FLG)
8" GV (FLG x MJ)
8" 11.25° BEND (MJ x MJ)
12" GV (FLG x MJ)
8" x 6" TEE (FLG)
6" GV (FLG x MJ)
8" x 6" REDUCER
(FLG x MJ)
9'
(MIN)
6" TRANSITION COUPLING,

REMOVE EXISTING AC PIPE

TO NEAREST JOINT
EXISTING 6" AC

WATER LINE
3 REMOVE EXISTING TRANSITION
COUPLING AND REPLACE WITH A NEW 12"

DUCTILE IRON TRANSITION COUPLING
EXISTING 12" PVC C900
6 1

FOR CONTINUATION
SEE SHEET C-10
1 FOR CONTINUATION
SEE SHEET C-09
27 28
27 4
12" GV (FLG x MJ)
GD
JM
AF
C-20
23 CIVIL
CONNECTION DETAILS 3

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:36:11-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024
Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig.

SCALE:

THRUST RESTRAINT - BURIED RESTRAINT LENGTH11
C-01 THRU
C-10

NO SCALE

RESTRAINED JOINTS

REQUIRED ACROSS

LENGTH 'L'

FITTING TYPE NOMINAL SIZE BEND ANGLE BRANCH SIZE LENGTH ALONG RUN REDUCED SIZE RESTRAINT LENGTH HORIZONTAL BEND 12 90 38 FT.

HORIZONTAL BEND 12 45 16 FT.

HORIZONTAL BEND 12 22.5 8 FT.

HORIZONTAL BEND 12 11.25 4 FT.

TEE 12 8 5 20 FT.

REDUCER 8 6 35 FT.

TEE 8 6 5 10 FT.

HORIZONTAL BEND 8 90 28 FT.

HORIZONTAL BEND 8 45 12 FT.

HORIZONTAL BEND 8 22.5 6 FT.

HORIZONTAL BEND 8 11.25 3 FT.

NOTES:

RESTRAINED LENGTHS CALCULATED FOR PVC PIPE BURIED A MINIMUM OF 3.5 FT IN A TYPE 5 TRENCH. SOIL TYPE ASSUMPTION SM PER PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. FACTOR OF SAFETY OF 2 AND A TEST PRESSURE OF 150 PSI.

THRUST RESTRAINT TABLE
L
L

PVC PIPE

NON-RESTRAINED

JOINT PER SPEC (TYP)
NOTES:

1. LENGTHS SHALL APPLY EACH WAY FROM HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL BEND, VALVE, OR DEAD END. FOR A TEE OR WYE, THE

RESTRAINED LENGTH SHALL APPLY ALONG THE BRANCH OF THE FITTING, ALSO RESTRAIN ONE STANDARD JOINT LENGTH OF PIPE EACH WAY ALONG THE RUN SIDE OF THE TEE OR WYE.

2. EXTEND ALL LENGTHS TO THE NEXT PIPE JOINT PAST REQUIRED LENGTH.

3. THE LENGTH OF CARRIER PIPE WITHIN A CASING PIPE WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE REQUIRED R

ESTRAINED
LENGTH.

THRUST BLOCK DIMENSIONS TABLE

PIPE SIZE (IN) FITTING TYPE BEARING AREA
(SQ FT)

THRUST BLOCK

WIDTH (FT)

THRUST BLOCK

HEIGHT (FT)
12 TEE/CAP 16.96 5.82 2.91
12 90 BEND 23.99 6.93 3.46
12 45 BEND 12.98 5.10 2.55
12 22.5 BEND 6.62 3.64 1.82
8 TEE/CAP 7.54 3.88 1.94
8 90 BEND 10.66 4.62 2.31
8 45 BEND 5.77 3.40 1.70
8 22.5 BEND 2.94 2.43 1.21
6 TEE/CAP 4.24 2.91 1.46
6 90 BEND 6.00 3.46 1.73
6 45 BEND 3.25 2.55 1.27
6 22.5 BEND 1.65 1.82 0.91
SCALE:

THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREA CHART12
C-01
C-02
C-05
C-06
C-07
C-08
C-10

NO SCALE

REDUCER

HORIZONTAL BEND

HORIZONTAL BEND
TEE

DEAD END

REDUCER
6 6
6 6
8 12
6 8
45 22.5

11.25 6 5
4 4
33 FT.
9 FT.
5 FT.
3 FT.
10 FT.
118 FT.
64 FT.
60 FT.

SCALE:

MODIFIED GS-2613
- NO SCALE

MODIFIED
GS-26
VERTICAL OFFSET 12 45
VERTICAL OFFSET 12 22.5
VERTICAL OFFSET 12 11.25

LOWSIDE DEPTH
5 5
5 49 FT.
24 FT.
12 FT.

RESTRAINT LENGTH 212 FT.
6 FT.
3 FT.

SCALE:

CONNECTION DETAIL15
- NO SCALE

EXISTING
NEW
1 KEY NOTES:
#

1. LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION. REFER TO

SPECIFICATIONS FOR TEMPORARY SHUTDOWN
REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION.

2. REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING PIPING PER
PLAN. CONNECT NEW PIPING INTO EXISTING
FLANGE AT 90 BEND.
2 NOTE:

1. FOR BIDDING PURPOSES, ALL TRENCH REPAIR SECTIONS FOR MAIN AND SERVICE PIPING WITHIN CARLSBAD BOULEVARD SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 10-INCH AC OVER 6-INCH CONCRETE. ACTUAL SECTIONS ARE KNOWN TO VARY ALONG THE ALIGNMENT. SEE DETAIL 17 SHEET 17.

GD
JM
AF
C-21
24 CIVIL
CONNECTION DETAILS 4

CARLSBAD BLVD WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT TERRAMAR
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR:

CIP 5048 AND 5503 540-1
24 FINAL SUBMITTAL - BID SET
Digitally signed by Andrew J. Frost
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Date: 2024.01.08 13:36:31-08'00'
DocuSign Envelope ID: F936EC80-B63C-4928-B949-3F01E91CA6B3 1/29/2024

Carlsbad City CouncilFebruary 13, 2024

Carlsbad City Council
February 13, 2024