has the appropriate permits and approvals and
access to needed public facilities.
• The project is a senior citizen housing
development; in which case, no affordable units
are required.
• The project is a mobile home park that is age-
restricted to senior citizens; in which case, no
affordable units are required.
AFFORDABILITY DURATION
State density bonus law establishes how long an
affordable unit must stay affordable.
• Affordable re ntal units must be restricted at the
targeted income level group for at least 55 years.
• Affordable for-sale u nits must be restricted at the
targeted income level group for at least 30 years,
which starts after the initial sale of the affordable
unit. Affordable units may be sold at a market
price to other than targeted households provided
that the sale results in an equity sharing
agreement with the city.
DEN
SITY BONUS CALCULATIONS
Despite the city’s rounding requirements under CMC
§21.53.230 (Table A), f or projects utilizing density
bonus, Government Code §65915(q) requires that
each component of any density calculation resulting in
fractional units shall be separately rounded up to the
next whole number. In other words, all density related
calculations must be rounded up.
Base Density Calculation
Step one in calculating density bonus is to calculate
the project’s base density, which represents the
number of dwelling units allowed under the city’s
General Plan, per acre of property. Calculating base
density under density bonus is no different from how
the city calculates density for standard residential
development projects, with the following exceptions:
• While the city uses developable (or net) acreage
in determining density, density bonus law
requires cities to use gross acreage. This
allowance was clarified in an HCD technical
assistance letter dated July 26, 2 023.
• While the city utilizes a “mid-range” density
calculation for determining the allowable number
of units on a property, state law requires that
density bonus be calculated based upon the
maximum density allowed under the city’s
General Plan and zoning ordinance for the
subject property.
• Pursuant to SB-330 (Housing Crisis Act of 2019),
the city is prohibited from enforcing housing
caps. As such, the housing caps in the city’s
Growth Management Plan (GMP) cannot be
applied to new housing development projects.
Refer to IB-132 for more information on SB-330
and Reso No. 2021-074 for the city’s su spension
of the GMP cap limits and performance standard
moratorium provisions.
Density Bonus Calculation
Step two in calculating density bonus is to calculate
the project’s density increase, which represents the
number of units allowed in addition to the base
density units. These additional dwelling units are set
per a sliding scale, based upon two primary factors:
• The percentage of units in the project that will be
set aside (reserved) as affordable; and,
• The household income category of those
affordable units (i.e., very low, low, or moderate
income).
For convenience, a Density Bonus Table is included on
page six of the city’s Density Bonus Report (Form
P-1(H)). As you will see from the table, the number of
affordable units (far left column) and the level of
affordability (top row) greatly influence the number of density bonus units that can be granted.
For example, a project that reserves 10% of its units as affordable for very low-income families is eligible for a
32.5% density bonus, as opposed to a density bonus of
only 20% if those same affordable units were reserved
for low-income families. Refer to info -bulletin IB-137 (Carlsbad’s Housing Plan) for more information on
household income and affordability.
July 29, 2025
Item #13 Page 176 of 188
Docusign Envelope ID: C67B0BCC-71D9-4569-B459-7771E3874ED3 IB-112_State Density Bonus Law_Updated: March 2024 Page 3 of 7 IN
CLUSIONARY HOUSING CALCULATIONS
To help provide local affordable housing, the city in
1993 adopted an inclusionary housing ordinance
(§21.85), which established the legal basis for
requiring affordable (inclusionary) housing units in
new residential development in the city.
For more information, refer to info-bulletin IB-157
(Inclusionary Housing Program). While the city’s
inclusionary regulations are separate from density
bonus law, there are a few important provisions in the
city’s inclusionary ordinance that directly affect
density bonus projects, as reflected below.
• The city’s inclusionary requirements a pply to all
proposed development projects that include
residential units. This means that projects
subject to the state density bonus law/city’s
density bonus ordinance (§21.86), must also
comply with the city’s inclusionary housing
ordinance (§21.85).
• Projects proposing seven or more housing units
are required to restrict at least 15% of the total
proposed units for low-income households. The
total proposed units include base density and
density bonus units.
• When calculating inclusionary requirements,
fr
actional units resulting in less than 0.5 are
rounded down to the next whole number.
• The required affordable inclusionary units satisfy
the required affordable density bonus units.
The city’s application of its inclusionary code is
consistent with AB 2345 and the D epartment of
Housing & Community Development’s (HCD)
technical assistance l etter dated September 2, 2022
to the City of West Hollywood.
THEORETICAL EXAMPLE
Sometimes showing the math helps folks better
understand how density bonus works. The following is
a theoretical example on how these different density
calculations are applied.
SECO
NDARY DENSITY BONUS
AB 1287 (Alvarez, 2023) amended state density bonus
law by requiring jurisdictions to award an additional
(or second) density bonus for projects that have
allocated a certain amount of affordable housing for
very-low income, low-income, or moderate-income
units, as summarized in the section below.
Minimum Eligibility
The proposed density bonus project must comply with
one of the following affordability requirements to be
eligible for an additional density bonus.
• A minimum of 15% of the base units are reserved
for very low-income households; or
• A minimum of 24% of the base units are reserved
for low-income households; or
• A minimum of 44% of the base units are reserved
for moderate-income households.
A property 1.003 net acres in size has a zoni ng
designation of R-15 (11.5 to 15 dwelling units per
acre). Under density bonus, this results in a maximum
base density of 15.05 units for this site (1.003 acres
multiplied by 15 units per acre), which rounds up to 16 units.
The applicant pro poses t hat 3 of the 16 units will be reserved for low-income households. This results in
18.7% of the units that will be reserved as affordable
housing (3 affordable units divided by 16 base density
units), which rounds up to 19%.
Based on the sliding scale found in the Density Bonus
Tabl
e in the Density Bonus Report (Form P-1(H)), with
19% of the affordable units re served for low-income
families, the project’s base density can increase by
33.5% or 5.36 units (16 base density units multiplied by
33.5%), which rounds up to 6 density bonus units for a total of 22 units for this project.
To satisfy the city’s inclusionary ordinance, a total of
3.3 affordable low-income units are required for this
project (15% inclusionary requirement multiplied by 22
total units), which rounds down to 3 units.
In this example, the 3 affordable low-income units
satisfy the requirements under state density bonus law
as well as the city’s inclusionary housing ordinance.
July 29, 2025
Item #13 Page 177 of 188
Docusign Envelope ID: C67B0BCC-71D9-4569-B459-7771E3874ED3
Density Increase
Under state law, the city must grant the developer an
additional density bonus if additional units are set
aside for either very low or moderate-income
households. Like traditional density bonus calculations, the secondary density bonus is also on a sliding scale, based on the project’s base density.
For reference, the secondary density bonus allowances
have been included in the Density Bonus Table found
on page six of the city’s Density Bonus Report (Form P- 1(H)). To help illustrate h ow this secondary density
bonus is applied, let us relook at the previous
theoretical example.
It is important to highlight that AB 1287 caps the
affordable set aside at 50%. For projects that allocate the maximum of moderate-income units (44%), they
would only be eligible to set aside another 6% of very- low income or moderate-income units to receive an
additional bonus of 23.75% or 22.5%, respectively.
REMOVAL OF EXISTING RENTAL UNITS
Under density bonus law, projects that include the
demolition or removal of affordable rental units are
ineligible for density bonus unless the units are
replaced concurrent with the development of the
project. This provision applies to the following types of rental units:
• Units subject to recorded restrictions
• Units subject to rent control
• Units occupied by very low- or low-income
households
If household rental income cannot be determined, the
city may assume households are occupied by low-
income households in the same proportion as low-
income renters in the city, consistent with AB 2556.
Additionally, under state law the affordable units
required under density bonus may also be used to
satisfy any replacement unit requirements. This
allowance was clarified in an HCD technical assistance
letter dated D ecember 14, 2023 .
DEVELOPMENT STANDARD DEVIATIONS
Traditional development projects must be designed to
comply with city established development standards
and design regulations such as building height
limitations, setback requirements, minimum parking
ratios, and on-site open space directives.
However, under state density bonus law, applicants
can deviate from these development standards when
found that the standards prevent the applicant from
achieving the density allowed under the state law.
There are two types of tools available to applicants:
• Incentives & Concessions
• Waivers
Instead of 3 units, the applicant now proposes
that 5 of the 16 units will be reserved for low-
income households. This results in 31.2% of the
units that will be reserved as affordable housing,
which rounds up to 32%.
With 32% of the affordable units reserved for
low-income households, the project’s base
density can increase by 50% or 8.0 units (16 base
density units multiplied by 50%), for a total of 24
units.
Since more than 24% of the base units are being
reserved for low-income households (31.2%,
specifically), this project is eligible for a second
density bonus. In this example, the applicant
proposes to reserve an additional 15% of the
base units for moderate-income households,
which results in 2.4 units (16 base density units
multiplied by 15%) that rounds up to 3 units.
With 15% of the affordable units reserved for
moderate-income households, the project’s base
density can increase by an additional 50% or 8.0
units (16 base density units multiplied by 50%).
As a result, the total project size increases to 32
total units, 8 of which will be restricted
affordable.
July 29, 2025
Item #13 Page 178 of 188
Docusign Envelope ID: C67B0BCC-71D9-4569-B459-7771E3874ED3 IB-112_State Density Bonus Law_Updated: March 2024 Page 5 of 7
Incentives & Concessions
Incentives and concessions, as defined under state
density bonus law, allow a developer to deviate from
those requirements when modifying such regulations
would provide “identifiable and actual cost
reductions” to provide for affordable housing costs
and rents. This requirement was clarified in the court
decision of Schreiber v. City of Los Angeles (later
codified as part of the passage of AB 1287) and the
sections below reflect the holdings in that case.
Application
A few key considerations regarding the application of
incentives or concessions:
• Under the government code, the terms
“incentives” and “concessions” are used
interchangeably. As such, the city considers them
one in the same (“incentives/concessions”).
• A density bonus project is entitled to
incentives/concessions even without a request
for a density bonus --- if a developer provides the
affordable housing specified under density bonus
law, they are eligible for incentives/concessions.
• The city applies incentives/concessions to the
development standards or design regulations
requiring deviation, not to the individual
situation.
For example, say a project proposes three
separate buildings with each building requiring
an increase in the city’s maximum building
height standard. In this example, the city would
require one incentive/concession for this
deviation, even though the deviation applies to
three separate buildings.
If t
hat same project requires a deviation from
the building height and rear yard setback
standards, the city will require two
incentives/concessions since these are
considered two different development
standards.
• Pu rsuant to the Schreiber case, which was later
codified as part of the passage of AB 1287, a
developer is not required to provide financial
evidence (i.e., pro forma) documenting that a
requested incentive/concession will result in
actual cost reductions. However, applicants need
to reasonably document “why” the requested
incentive/concession will reduce affordable
housing development costs. As such, the city
requires applicants to provide reasonable
documentation to show that a requested
incentive/concession will result in identifiable
cost reductions to provide for affordable housing
costs or rents.
Number Authorized
The number of incentives/concessions that can be
requested by a developer varies by the amount and
type of affordable units being proposed, as reflected
below.
INCOME % OF AFFORDABLE UNITS1
Very Low 5% 10% 15% 16% ≥80%
Low 10% 17% 24% --- ≥80%
Moderate 10% 20% 30% 45% 20%
Student2 20% --- --- --- ---
Incentives 1 2 3 4 53
1 The % of a project’s affordable units must be at least equal to the listed %. 2 Lower-income student in a dedicated student housing development. 3 To qualify for 5 incentives, a project must reserve at least 80% of the units for lower income households (very low, low, or combination thereof). The remaining 20% may be reserved for moderate income households. The applicant shall also receive a height increase of up to three additional stories, or 33 feet.
As noted in footnote #1, when determining the
appropriate number of incentives/concessions, a
project’s percentage of affordable units must be “at
least” equal to the percentages shown in the table
above (§65915(d)(2)). In other words, the percentages
in the table are minimums.
So, in the case of the theoretical example project that reserved 19% of the units for low-income, the
applicant is eligible to receive two
incentives/concessions. If affordable units are
provided to satisfy the city’s inclusionary housing
obligation above required density bonus affordable
units, the total number of affordable units count
July 29, 2025
Item #13 Page 179 of 188
Docusign Envelope ID: C67B0BCC-71D9-4569-B459-7771E3874ED3
when determining the number of
incentives/concessions allowed.
Grounds for Denial
Under the Schreiber case, the city must grant a
requested incentive/concession unless it finds, under
a preponderance of evidence, the following:
• The incentive/concession does not result in
identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide
for affordable housing costs or rents.
• Granting the incentive/concession would have a
specific adverse impact on public health or safety
or on property listed on the California historical
register, which cannot be mitigated, or would be
contrary to state or federal law.
Waivers
Density bonus law offers another form of assistance to
developers, separate from concessions/waivers, in the
form of “waivers.” A waiver is a modification or
reduction to established development standards or
design regulations when those requirements
potentially cause the construction of the development
project physically infeasible, if not approved.
Application
A few key considerations regarding waivers.
• Waivers do not count as an incentive/concession
and can be used in concert (combined) with
incentives/concessions.
• The developer must provide sufficient
documentation justifying why the city’s
established development standard(s) or design
regulation(s) physically preclude construction of
the project and why the waiver(s) is necessary.
Sufficient documentation may include a written
explanation of the physical constraints
accompanied with an exhibit showing the site
and developable envelope.
Number Authorized
Unlike concessions/incentives, applicants are
entitled to waive any established development
standards or design regulations that would physically
preclude the development from achieving the
allowances authorized under density bonus law. In
other words, there is no limit in the number of
waivers an applicant can request.
Grounds for Denial
The city is not required to grant or otherwise
authorize a waiver if it finds that the requested
deviation or modification causes a specific adverse
impact on public health or safety and cannot be
mitigated, would have an adverse impact on property
listed on the California historical register, or would
otherwise violate state or federal law.
Like incentives/concessions, the city must include a
showing of substantial evidence when making a
finding of denial on a waiver request.
PARKING ALLOWANCES
Despite the city’s parking requirements under CMC
§21.44, the city may not require more than the
following parking ratios for a density bonus project
(including parking for persons with disabilities):
Unit Type Required Parking
Studio 1 space
One Bedroom 1 space
Two Bedroom 1.5 spaces
Three Bedroom 1.5 spaces
Four Bedroom 2.5 spaces
July 29, 2025
Item #13 Page 180 of 188
Docusign Envelope ID: C67B0BCC-71D9-4569-B459-7771E3874ED3 IB-112_State Density Bonus Law_Updated: March 2024 Page 7 of 7
State law further limits parking requirements for
specified projects as reflected below.
• 0.5 spaces per unit for projects with at least 11%
very low income, 20% lower income, or 40%
moderate income, when located within ½ mile of
accessible major transit stop, which in the city is
the Carlsbad Village Coaster Station or Poinsettia
Coaster Station.
• No parking spaces are required for projects
meeting the following:
o 100% affordable to lower income residents,
within ½ mile of a major transit stop, which
in the city is the Carlsbad Village Coaster
Station or Poinsettia Coaster Station.
o 100% senior or special needs rental project
affordable to lower income, either with
paratransit service or within ½ mile of an
accessible bus route that operates at least
eight times per day.
o Rental supportive housing development
that is 100% affordable to lower income
households.
Parking requirements may be satisfied by providing
individual parking stalls or in tandem, so long as the
stalls are provided onsite.
Requesting these parking standards does not count as
an incentive/concession or waiver; however, an
applicant may request further parking standard
reductions using the incentive/concession or waiver
allowances.
DENSITY BONUS APPLICATIONS
The city’s Density Bonus Ordinance can be found in
CMC §21.86 and applicants should follow the permit
submittal requirements and processes set forth in the
Land Use Review Application (Form P-1).
Pursuant to changes in state density bonus law that
went into effective in 2019, the city developed a
supplemental form outlining the information that
must be submitted for a complete density bonus
application; referred to as the Density Bonus Report
Form P-1(H). This includes project location, property
description, project description, density calculations, and information on any requested
incentives/concessions or waivers.
Once a development application is determined to be
com
plete, the city, under state law, will notify the
applicant of the level of density bonus and parking
ratio the development is eligible to receive.
PROJECTS IN THE COASTAL ZONE
When a density bonus project is proposed in the
coastal zone, legislation that went into effect in 2019 attempted to strike a balance between the state goals
of promoting housing and protecting the coast.
Density bonuses, incentives/concessions, waivers, and
parking reductions are to be permitted so that they
are consistent with both density bonus law and the
California Coastal Act. Granting of a density bonus or an incentive does not require a general plan, zoning, or local coastal plan amendment.
YOUR OPTIONS FOR SERVICE
To schedule an appointment to submit an application
or to learn more about density bonus, please contact
the Planning Division at 442-339-2600 or via email at
[email protected].
NOTE: State density bonus law is regularly updated
and revised by the state legislature and the city may
not be able to timely update this bulletin to reflect
the most current provisions. Please refer to current
state law (§65915 et seq.).
July 29, 2025
Item #13 Page 181 of 188
Docusign Envelope ID: C67B0BCC-71D9-4569-B459-7771E3874ED3 From: Planning
To: Kyle Van Leeuwen
Cc: Eric Lardy; Cynthia Vigeland
Subject: FW: Please Reconsider Support for Roosevelt Project – 2621 Roosevelt Street Date: Friday, April 4, 2025 10:24:32 AM
From: Kyle Franks <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 9:26 AM
To: Planning <[email protected]>
Subject: Please Reconsider Support for Roosevelt Project – 2621 Roosevelt Street Dear Planning Commission Members,
I hope this message finds you well. As a resident of District 1, I am writing to share my concerns regarding the proposed development at 2621 Roosevelt Street, commonly referred to as The Roosevelt Project.
Project Density and Neighborhood Character
The proposal for a four-story, 23-unit mixed-use building on a 0.46-acre lot appears to exceed the typical density for our neighborhood. Such a development could significantly alter the existing character of the area. I understand that state density bonus laws allow for increased density in certain circumstances. However, it's crucial that any development aligns with the community's established aesthetic and scale.
Parking Considerations
The plan includes 24 parking spaces for 23 units, which may not adequately accommodate residents and visitors. While Assembly Bill 2097 restricts the city's ability to impose minimum parking requirements for developments near major transit stops, it's important to assess the practical parking needs of this project to prevent potential overflow into surrounding streets.
Community Input and Local Planning
I appreciate the city's efforts to comply with state housing laws aimed at addressing the housing crisis. However, I believe that community input remains vital in shaping developments that reflect both state objectives and local values. Ensuring that projects like The Roosevelt align with Carlsbad's General Plan and zoning ordinances is essential for balanced growth.
Thank you for considering my perspectives on this matter.
Kyle Franks
Exhibit 8
July 29, 2025
Item #13 Page 182 of 188
Docusign Envelope ID: C67B0BCC-71D9-4569-B459-7771E3874ED3 From: Planning
To: Kyle Van Leeuwen
Cc: Eric Lardy
Subject: FW: Opposition to Roosevelt Project, Dog Policy Changes, and Drive-Thru Repeal Date: Monday, April 7, 2025 12:23:16 PM
From:
Cynthia Vigeland <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 11:57 AM
To: Planning <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Opposition to Roosevelt Project, Dog Policy Changes, and Drive-Thru Repeal
The clerk’s office is forwarding this to planning.
From:
Kyle Franks <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 9:23 AM
To: Council Internet Email <[email protected]>
Subject: Opposition to Roosevelt Project, Dog Policy Changes, and Drive-Thru Repeal
Dear City Councilmembers,
I'm a resident of District 1 writing to express my concern about three proposals currently under review. I appreciate your leadership and the time you dedicate to these decisions, but I believe these changes would negatively impact our community:
1. The Roosevelt Project at 2621 Roosevelt Street
A 4-story, 23-unit mixed-use development with only 24 parking spaces on a 0.46-acre lot seems excessive. It doesn’t fit the scale of the neighborhood and raises serious questions about traffic, parking overflow, and long-term infrastructure strain. It’s also unclear if any affordable housing is included. This feels like another instance where state density bonuses are used to override thoughtful, local planning.
2. Dog Access in Parks and Beaches
As a lifeguard in Encinitas, I’ve seen firsthand the benefits of strictly enforcing no-dog rules on beaches. It helps keep beaches clean, minimizes conflicts between dogs and people or wildlife, and creates a more peaceful, family-friendly environment. Once you allow dogs broadly, enforcement becomes nearly impossible, and the quality of these public spaces quickly declines. I urge you to maintain the current restrictions.
3. Drive-Thru Repeal
Carlsbad’s long-standing ban on new drive-thrus has protected the city’s charm and walkability. Lifting that ban opens the door to increased traffic, emissions, and fast-food-style development that undercuts the coastal, community-first feel we all value.
July 29, 2025
Item #13 Page 183 of 188
Docusign Envelope ID: C67B0BCC-71D9-4569-B459-7771E3874ED3 I hope you’ll take resident concerns into account as you consider these proposals. Thank you for your service and attention.
Best,
Kyle Franks
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
July 29, 2025
Item #13 Page 184 of 188
Docusign Envelope ID: C67B0BCC-71D9-4569-B459-7771E3874ED3 From: Kyle Van Leeuwen
To: Kyle Van Leeuwen
Subject: FW: New comment on Just approved, a new 4 story building on Roosevelt...
Date: Tuesday, July 22, 2025 8:53:41 AM
From:
craig ryall <[email protected]>
Sent:
Saturday, April 5, 2025 4:56 PM
To:
Melanie Burkholder <[email protected]>
Subject:
Fwd: New comment on Just approved, a new 4 story building on Roosevelt...
Hello Melanie,
I'm not sure if you get these Nextdoor posts but I thought you would be interested in the one forwarded below if you haven't seen it already.
I attended the planning commission meeting where this project was discussed and approved and I spoke for a few minutes at the meeting. This is the first planning meeting I have ever attended in any city but I wanted to speak about this project and others that are in the planning process on Roosevelt.
I thought the
developer did an
excellent
job of
presenting the project. I am also familiar with several of
the
other
projects that
he has completed in
the village and I think they are excellent. That said, I wanted
you to be aware of
my
concerns and obviously the concerns of many based on
the
post
below since this is your district. I was surprised
about the UT newspaper coverage and the ensuing
conversation on Nextdoor.
To give you a little context, my wife and
I moved to Carlsbad Village about 4 years ago from
Encinitas
(Olivenhain) where we raised
our 5 daughters. We wanted to see how we
would like a
more
urban
environment. We love it here and plan to spend
our
retirement years in the Village. We currently
own and live in a condo in Beachwalk in the same
block as this proposed development. We plan on
keeping
and long term renting this condo and we will be moving across the street into
one of
the top
floor
units in
Roosevelt Nine when it is completed in the next month or so. We are heavily
invested
in the village both emotionally and financially.
As I'm sure you know there are at least 4 projects at some stage of the approval process on
Roosevelt St north of Grand Avenue including this one. I am very much in favor of
continuing to
improve the
Village and Roosevelt St in particular and making more housing and business space available. That said, it has to be done carefully in order to not exacerbate an
already bad
parking
problem and strain the
infrastructure.
Parking is difficult on this street already.The 2 projects that we will be
owners in each have 2 parking
spaces (garages) per unit but no visitor parking and very limited handicapped parking. (Only one spot at Beachwalk, always full, none on the street). I'd say parking at these 2 developments is tight but workable. I'm not sure what the plans are for any of
the others except the one discussed in the
planning meeting 'The Roosevelt', but I am concerned that the combination of all them
could make
July 29, 2025
Item #13 Page 185 of 188
Docusign Envelope ID: C67B0BCC-71D9-4569-B459-7771E3874ED3 the existing problem worse if not carefully planned.
Traffic often backs up when people are looking for a place to park. I sent Kyle the planner several pictures taken on March 27 of a packed street including one of a 3 car accident that happened in front of the post office. There is almost always a queue of cars stacked up trying to get into the post office. Being a pedestrian on this street is a challenge because cars are parked all the way to the corners and there
are no crosswalks with stop buttons.
'The Roosevelt' has 23 residential units and 24 spots for them. It also has 7 businesses with no parking at all. I am aware of the restrictions
the state has placed on cities with AB2097 and I am also aware of some of the bonus density provisions that allow developers to build projects like 'The Roosevelt'. I think there are exemptions where projects hinder the needs of handicapped or elderly people and/or ones that negatively impact residential or commercial parking within 1/2 mile of the project.
While I would like to see Fabric, the developer for 'The Roosevelt' come back with a design that has more parking, I am more concerned about the aggregate of all of the proposed projects including this one. Some combination of the city and the developers need to partner going forward to solve this issue to make sure that the right balance is struck. I'm sure this is a tough job for both the planning commission and the city council but it is important.
I think it is also important that residents, planners and council members work together on making our city
a great place to live. As I said before I have never been to a planning meeting and the only city council meeting I went to was to celebrate our citizens of the year. The discussions in the planning meeting were cordial, respectful and calm so I was shocked when Dave Hubinger made his comments about a hissy fit on parking (and it seems others were as well.)
Sorry for the long email but I thought it important to communicate since this will be an ongoing issue in the village.
Best Regards
Craig
July 29, 2025
Item #13 Page 186 of 188
Docusign Envelope ID: C67B0BCC-71D9-4569-B459-7771E3874ED3 From: Kyle Van Leeuwen
To: Kyle Van Leeuwen
Subject: FW: Case Name: The Roosevelt: public comment
Date: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 3:21:36 PM
From:
Jeff Lussenden <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2025 4:29 PM
To: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Cc: Kelly Lussenden <[email protected]>
Subject: Case Name: The Roosevelt: public comment
Hi,
I received the Notice of Public Hearing for 'The Roosevelt', case file: SDP 2024-0001 (DEV2024-0014) and have a comment.
I believe the parking plan is inadequate for the proposed development, and would like you to deny the request for the 50% density bonus.
There are 23 proposed units, and 24 covered parking spaces.
Of those 23 units, three will be two bedroom, two will
be very-low-income, and two more will be moderate-income.
It is unrealistic to think that a two bedroom unit will only require one space, as the occupants will be two parents, or two working individuals.
Therefore, you need at least 26 parking spaces, and since you have 25 or more parking spaces, you are required by California ADA rules to have at least one ADA compliant space, and will probably require more, given that 5% of Californians have disabled parking permits.
If you approve the development as originally proposed, you'll have more people parking permanently on the street, or continually circling the blocks looking for a spot.
There could also be issues with ADA compliance.
This will
exacerbate already existing parking issues in the village.
thanks,
-jeff lussenden
2577 State Street
Carlsbad CA 92008
760-473-6175
[email protected]
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
July 29, 2025
Item #13 Page 187 of 188
Docusign Envelope ID: C67B0BCC-71D9-4569-B459-7771E3874ED3 From: Kyle Van Leeuwen
To: Kyle Van Leeuwen
Subject: FW: Attention for development at 2621 Roosevelt st.
Date: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 3:21:06 PM
From:
peggy wilson <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 11:44 AM
To: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Attention for development at 2621 Roosevelt st.
This development is only going to have 24 parking spaces.
I know that development will
require more parking. The parking in this area is very limited.
Will there be housing for senior citizens or lower to middle income residents? Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
July 29, 2025
Item #13 Page 188 of 188
Docusign Envelope ID: C67B0BCC-71D9-4569-B459-7771E3874ED3
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO: CITY CLERK
DATE OF PUBLIC H EARi NG: ~J_ul __ , ~- ~?J-6 ....... l...-;)_D"-E.~""=5 _________ _ suBJEcT: T n-e.. ~e.ve.l:±
LOCATION: ~ 200 Carlsba~ Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008 D Other: ------- --------- --
DATE POSTED TO CITY WEBSITE 01- \ ~ ~ 1.Dlli
DATE NOTICES MAILED TO PROPERTY OWNERS: 01..- \0 .., 10Jh NUMBER, MAILED:
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am employed by t he City of Carlsbad and the foregoing is true and correct.
DEPARTMENT: w£.TY CLERK'S OFFICE □ OTHER ______ _ _
cf)~ i110AAH1 ~ · . 07-2--s ~i~s
Si gnat~ • Date
--- - -------------- --------- -------------------------- ------------------------- SENT TO FOR PUBLICATION VIA E-MAIL TO: □ Union Tribune on - - - ~ Coa.st News on JvJ'Q \\,?O~
PUBLICATION DATE: Union Tribune --- ~ -------- --
Coast News J uJ. '6 \ ~, ?-0 ';>-~
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am employed by the City of Carlsbad and the foregoing is true and correct.
DEPARTMENT: csa"c1TY CLERK'S OFFICE □ OTHER _______ _
Attachments: 1) Mailing Labels
2) Notice w/ attachments
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chamber, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 29, 2025, to consider approving a Site development Plan to allow for the demolition of an existing commercial structure and the construction of a four-story mixed -use structure consisting of 5,406 square feet of office and commercial space, 23 multiple-family residential apartment units (20 one-bedroom units, 3 two -bedroom units) and 24 covered parking spaces. Two 50% density bonuses allowing 12 additional units above base residential density are requested, with the dedication of 2 units for very-low-income households (15% of the base density) and dedication of 2 units for moderate-income households {15% of the base density). The 0.46-acre project site is located at 2621 Roosevelt Street in the northwest quadrant of the city, within the Village and Barrio Master Plan, and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1, and more particularly described as:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 23 OF SEASIDE LANDS, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 1722, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JULY 28, 1921, LYING
NORTHEASTERLY OF A STRAIGHT LINE CONNECTING THE MID-POINTS OF THE NORTHWESTERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY LINES OF SAID LOT.
Whereas, on April 2, 2025, the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission voted 4-0-3 (Commissioners Burrows, Lafferty, and Stine absent) to recommend approval of a site development plan.
Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an exemption determination is recommended for adoption in compliance with CEQA 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after Friday, July 25, 2025, on the city's website at https ://www.carlsbadca .gov/city-hall/meetings-agendas . If you have any questions , please contact Senior Planner Kyle Van Leeuwen in the Planning Division at (442) 339 -2611 or [email protected] . The meeting can be viewed on line at https://www.carlsbadca.gov/city-hall/meetings-agendas or on the city's cable channel. In addition, written comments may be submitted to the City Council at or prior to the hearing via U.S. Mail to the attention of Office of the City Clerk, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, or via email to clerk@carlsbadca .gov.
If you challenge the decision on the Site Development Plan in court , you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk's Office, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE:
CASE NAME:
PUBLISH:
SOP 2024-0001 (DEV2024-0014)
THE ROOSEVELT
FRIDAY, JULY 18, 2025
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY COUNCIL
I
JAY CARLSBAD LLC
1518 6TH AVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
I CARLSBAD 1 7 LP
1 234 VENTURE ST
I STE 100
I SAN MARCOS CA 92078
BLADEL FAMILY TRUST 10-22-91
2501 STATE ST
UNIT 207
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I WELLMAN MICHAEL AND CORY J
REVOCABLE 1996 TRUST
2501 STATE ST
UNIT 304
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HEFFNER FAMILY 2016
TRUST 01-22-16
2501 STATE ST
UNIT 402
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SOIL 0405 LLC
800 GRAND AVE
STE 304
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PEELLE FAMILY TRUST
2441 BUENA VISTA CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
KURNER LAURA C
2461 BUENA VISTA CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FARROW TRUST 03-17-23
125 MOZART AVE
CARDIFF CA 92007
MILLARD JEFFREY J AND
DIANE M 2006 TRUST 03 - 22-06
568 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
CITY OF CARLSB.'',D
PUBLIC AGENCY
CARLSBAD C~ 92008
HARRIS GLENN AND LAURIE
2501 STATE ST
UNIT 204
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MORENO VANWYK FAMILY
TRUST 11-08-21
5365 LOS ROBLES DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I DEDERICH LIVING
TRUST 09-08 - 97
59015 MARBELLA
) I
I I
LA QUINTA CA 92253
DEROZE MARK
2501 STATE ST
UNIT 403
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CARDWELL PATRICK KAND
CORINA L
27132 KENYON SUMMIT RD
ADEL IA 50003
BENCHMARK PACIFIC LTD I I
1330 RAVEAN CT
ENCINITAS CA 92024
MEMEL RONN AND DIANNE L
2451 BUENA VISTA CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
IRWIN FAMILY TRUST 04-11-07
7040 AVENIDA ENCINAS
STE 104-415
CARLSBAD CA 92011
KENNALLY SINCLAIR
566 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
KELLIHER JOHN F III AND
SUSAN M
7 BANDYWINE FALLS RD
WILMINGTON DE 19806
I THOMAS WINSTON s FAMILY
TRUST 12-05-16
2501 STATE ST
UNIT 205
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TODD CHARLES RAND ANNE M
27 MULBERRY LN
BOXFORD MA 00000
POSSEMATO FAMILY
TRUST 07 - 06 - 07
2501 STATE ST
UNIT 306
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MCINTIRE JANE TRUST 03-05-15
2501 STATE ST
UNIT 404
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OCEAN CONDOMINIUMS OWNERS
ASSOCIATION
5950 LA PLACE CT
STE 200
CARLSBAD CA 92008
590 LAGUNA STATUTORY TRUST
3225 MCLEOD DR
STE 777
LAS VEGAS NV 89121
KRUEGER CHRISTOPHER W
TRUST 02-07 - 19
133 MOZART AVE
CARDIFF CA 92007
LANE JOHN AND KAREN
TRUST 04-15 - 03
148 VERDI AVE
CARDIFF CA 92007
MLR562 LLC
280 S BEVERLY DR
STE 400
BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212
GOMEZ ROSA LIVING
TRUST 12-19-14
560 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
SHERGILL FAMLY REVOCABLE
LIVING TRUST
5135 WISTERIA DR
I OCEANSIDE CA 92056
CHRISMAN DAVID BAND ANNA C
2440 BUENA VISTA CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I MCCLURE FAMILY LIVING
TRUST 07 - 15-14
654 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HAYNES RAY MAND PATRICIA K
TRUST 01-13-04
2855 CARLSBAD BLVD
UNIT S- 412
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HARPER V M LIVING
TRUST 08 - 23 -1 8
670 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BURKE FAMILY TRUST 01- 1 3-23
676 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LOH REAL ESTATE LP
PO BOX 1021
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
LADHOFF DON AND MARY
694 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BAH W FAMILY TRUST 08-05 - 20
5483 E ESTATE RIDGE RD
ANAHEIM CA 92807
l
ATKINSON BRI AN AND ALYSON
42 51 PLEASANTON AVE
PLEASANTON CA 94566
LAGUNA PROJECT LP
125 MOZART AVE
CARDIF F CA 92007
I LIVING TRUST OF MILLENDER ROY '
J III AND DIANE L
I 2430 BUENA VISTA CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
UNIAT TRUST 10- 24 -07
656 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GRENGS GEORGE AND KAREN
FAMILY TRUST 12-02-02
20430 VIA CELLINI
PORTER RANCH CA 91326
SANDERS RICHARD AND JANE
FAMILY 1997 TRUST 12- 10 - 97
I I I 67 2 LAGUNA DR
I CARLSBAD CA 92008
TINNEY RANDALL AND LOLA
684 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
1 I SMITH FAMILY TRUST 05-29-14
690 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC CO 1
PO BOX 129831
SAN DIEGO CA 92112
MCCULLOUGH MARY A
TRUST 04-05 - 21
2687 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MYERS ERIC
97 N COAST HIGHWAY 101
ENCINITAS CA 92024
r KAIRATH JOHN E AND ANDRA A
2450 BUENA VISTA CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PAVAGADHI MAYUR
TRUST 08-31-06
624 LAGUNA DR
I CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
FELDMAN FAMILY TRUST 07-22-10
107 BRIAN CT
PALM DESERT CA 92260
FAHEY PATRICK J
668 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
VILLAS DE LA PLAYA
I
TRUST 11 - 20 - 03
674 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DECKER GARY AND CHRISTINE
686 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BERNAUER REVOCABLEO
TRUST 07 - 01 - 10
1069 GRANITO DR
OJAI CA 93023
VIGILUCCI FAMILY
TRUST 11-29 - 23
111 TAMARACK AVE
APT 105
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WEINBERGER LAWRENCE AND
LAURIE
211 MAPLE AVE
SEA CLIFF NY 11579
VENSTROM FAMILY
TRUST 08-03-04
2933 LANCASTER RD
I CARLSBAD CA 920 10
J KS G EDWARDS FAMILY
TRUST 02 -1 5-01
3980 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DRINKWARD ROBERT WAND JOYCE
M FAMILY TRUST 10- 20-89
2677 STATE ST
STE 301
! CARLSBAD CA 92008
l
SCBAD LLC
2139 MONTGOMERY AVE
CARDIFF CA 92007
MARSON MARKE
2513 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
POVAR PAULETTE H LIVING
TRUST 07-07-16
2507 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PASTEGA CHRISTOPHER BAND
KIMBERLY S
24304 116TH AVE W
WOODWAY WA 98020
REILLY DARRIN LIVING
TRUST 12-20-18
1407 TOWN CREEK DR
AUSTIN TX 78741
DELHOMME JOSHUA
8591 MENKAR RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92126
ROBINSON STEVEN AND PAULA
LIFE TRUST 04 -0 3- 23
2555 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SPEERT ELLEN FAMILY
TRUST 11 -0 2- 87
2639 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ERE PROPERTIE S LL C
1054 LA SOMBRA DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92078
ROBBINS REVOCABLE
TRUST 06 -1 2- 15
2677 STATE ST
STE 302
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BRADLEY NEIL AND KATRINA
FAMILY TRUST 04-04-15
2517 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LYLE FAMILY TRUST 01-1 2- 06
25 11 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I GIOULAKIS MICHAEL AND
, I ALEXANDRA
! 2505 STATE ST
1 I CARLSBAD CA 92008
I I
I I
1 I
SWEENEY FAMILY TRUST 11-16-17
2525 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CLAWSON MITCHELL AND
JACQUELYNE
2537 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DAVIS MARC RAND HEATHER M
2549 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STEWART FAMILY TRUST
2551 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SPEERT ELLEN FAMILY
. TRUST 11-02-87
I 2 633 STATE ST
, CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
TH STATE STREET LLC
PO BOX 7050
l RCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
[ 2659 STATE PARTNERS LLC
1 375 VIA LINDA DEL SUR
• ENCINITAS CA 92024
1 ! BLONSTEIN MARC AND JOY
2515 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
. WATERMELON LIVING
TRUST 03-13 - 24
1 2509 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
I I
MARSHALL WILLIAM J AND DAWN
2503 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SINGLETON GERALD B REVOCABLE
TRUST
2529 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ROSE WAYNE AND JENNIFER
FAMILY TRUST 11 - 23 - 22
8716 CAYUCOS WAY
SAN DIEGO CA 92129
RAND C PADILLA FAMILY
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
6708 CAMPHOR PL
1 CARLSBAD CA 92011
KUCH MICHAEL AND HERNANDEZ
KIM L
2547 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
NAVEIRA FAMILY REVOCABLE
LIVING TRUST 06 - 02-11
2543 STATE ST
J CARLSBAD CA 92008
I BELTRAN ANTONIO
2 NIDDEN
IRVINE CA 92603
NEWMAN JANET L
2589 STATE ST
I CARLSBAD CA 92008
f FERNANDEZ HENRY J JR AND
PHAM-FERNANDEZ TUYET PHUONG
2595 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WOOD MICAH AND BERG ANASTASIA
2557 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HAWKES WILLIAM D JR AND
DONOVAN JANICE K
2569 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CARPENTER THERESA
2581 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SELLERS JASON T AND MELISSA K
2579 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FOWLER PETER D REVOCABLE
LIVING TRUST 09-26-12
2567 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA
LLC
6440 OAK CYN
STE 200
IRVINE CA 926 18
SKINNER GEROGE A FAMILY
TRUST 06 - 10-21
2539 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
LUKAS RIMAS T
2527 STATE ST
I CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
JANSEN JAMES HAND GILI
MEGHANN A
2591 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BASTA NICHOLAS AND ROSE
2597 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HOLT FAMILY TRUST 11-19 - 12
2561 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GREY BRIAN AND ANDREE
2573 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I I STROBRIDGE SKIBSTED FAMILY
TRUST 12 -17- 1 7
1 611 SE 8TH ST
FT LAUDERDALE FL 33316
NORDBURG JUDITH A AND ALLEN D
SKIP REVOCABLE LIVING
6901 E 1ST ST
STE 1006
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251
GOETZ MARY
6341 ALEXANDRI CIR
CARLSBAD CA 92011
SEAGROVE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
25531 COMMERCENTRE DR
STE 100
LAKE FOREST CA 92630
MACHADO ELIZABETH
2535 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I BKACK LINDA L REVOCABLE
LIVING TRUST 04-30-20
2523 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
J FIK CHRISTOPHER LAND TORIE N
2593 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I WRIGHT SARA J TRUST
2599 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
7620CA LLC
I \ :o~D~:Ni
1 !Y 82922
LUSSENDEN JEFFREY AND KELLY
2577 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BILLANTE FAMILY LIVIN G
TRUST 01-17-00
2583 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
YATES MATT C
401 CHANNELSIDE WALK WAY
APT 1273
TAMPA FL 33602
HESFORD DARRELL AND DEANNA J
2559 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TOWNHOUSE OWNERS ASSOCIATION
PO BOX 7050
RCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
SMITH EDMUND AND EDITH FAMILY
SURVIVORS TRUST 05 - 28 - 96
3271 WESTWOOD DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BEECHTREE OFFICE BUILDING
PARTNERSHIP
I
2653 ROOSEVELT ST
STE D
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
FABRIC 2656 STATE LLC
2659 STATE ST
STE 100
CARLSBAD CA 92008
2646 SEA GLASS LLC
PO BOX 17506
RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067
HUSTON FAMILY TRUST 05-18-92
PO BOX 547
CARLSBAD CA 92018
SHIRZAD KHOSROW CHARITABLE
REMAINDER UNITRUST
1547 AVENIDA LA POSTA
ENCINITAS CA 92024
SYCKS FAMILY TRUST 11-24-09
539 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
WARD ROBERT D AND DONNA L
TRUST 07-03-03
545 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GLAZE FAMILY TRUST 09-04-07
2676 COUNTRY CLUB DR
GLENDORA CA 91741
565 LAGUNA LL C
6904 DOVER CT
HIGHLAND CA 92346
2680 STATE STREET LLC
135 S SIERRA AVE
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
FIESTA LLC
2700 STATE ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BACON SETH J
2768 E WARBLER RD
GILBERT AZ 85297
SHADE KENT LLC
6985 CORTE LANGOSTA
CARLSBAD CA 92009
I JONES RICHARD L 2006
1 TRUST 10-25-06
I 996 VALENCIA AVE
SAN MARCOS CA 92078
HESS/HARTMAN FAMILY
' TRUST 01-17-04
' I 28348 ROADSIDE DR
j STE 204
AGOURA HILLS CA 91301
I
I
WOODD TERRI G TRUST 04-18-03
541 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FARES REVOCABLE LIVING
TRUST 06-01-19
551 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
EDNOFF DAVID WAND JANICE P
REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST
557 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DUSOLD FAMILY REVOCABLE
LIVING TRUST 06-24-16
38686 FLORENCE ST
BEAUMONT CA 92223
2680 STATE STREET LLC
1 135 S SIERRA AVE
UNIT 36
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
' [ TREJO FAMILY TRUST 07-16-02
PO BOX 281
CARLSBAD CA 92018
I CHERICH INVESTMENT LLC
5186 CARROLL CANYON RD
SAN DIEGO CA 92121
CHAMBERLAIN MICHAEL A AND
KIMBERLY A 2004 TRUST
2653 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
1 1 CABO ANNA M TRUST 04-25-17
P O BOX 1115
TAOS NM 87571
2569 ROOSEVELT LLC
PO BOX 448
CORONA DL MAR CA 92625
BLANTON FAMILY TRUST 02-01-00
49155 RANCHO POINTE
LA QUINTA CA 92253
WESTFALL JEREMY SAND
TAMARA D
5034 STARGAZER DR
HAPPY JACK AZ 86024
YEE REVOCABLE LIVING
TRUST 09-15-21
1071 LA REINA DR
SAN MARCOS CA 92078
LEON OLGA
571 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BURCH WILLIAM E VI
577 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OLLIVIER MIKE AND LORIE
FAMILY TRUST 10-09-13
439 GRAND DR
BOX 186
BIGFORK MT 59911
(
I GHARABIKLOU FARHAD AND
, GHARABIKLOU RENEE M REVOCABLE
595 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BRADEN RACHELE
2677 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
r ELMER KELSEY N
I 2685 ROOSEVELT ST
1 CARLSBAD CA 92008
DECAMINADA ANDREW M LIVING
TRUST 11 - 01-14
I 2693 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SHOOK SUSAN G
2699 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CREAL SHARON TRUST 12-17-19
2705 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BEACHWALK AT ROOSEVELT OWNERS
ASSN
4668 NEBO DR
LA MESA CA 91941
MAR VISTA TRUST 06 - 26 - 92
PO BOX 1481
CARLSBAD CA 92018
BUSSEY KATHRYN I REVOCABLE
LI VING TRUST 05 - 09 - 06
58 1 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I I
I
TALL 2010 FAMILY
I
TRUST 03 - 10-10
3384 AVENIDA NIEVE
I CARLSBAD CA 92009
I
l
I LEBLANC TRUST 12 - 15 - 94
I 8686 E STAGHORN LN
I SCOTTSDALE AZ 85266
I
I
SEARS CADE S
PO BOX 2917
DEL MAR CA 92014
I CUNNYNGHAM COLLIN AND ANGELA
I 2689 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
MISIR FAMILY TRUST 10-19-21
305 E MISSOURI AVE
PHOENIX AZ 85012
PATON ALISA J REVOCABLE
TRUST 09-22-06
2701 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HEATER JAMES AND DEBORAH
2709 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CSTATE LLC
122 CIVIC CENTER DR
STE 201
VISTA CA 92084
PCB SOCAL LLC
1701 STEWART ST
' OCEANSIDE CA 92054
EARDLEY MARGARET
583 LAGUNA DR
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SOUMBASAKIS JOHN AND JOSE
JEANNETTE S TRUST 05 - 07 - 08
23 TENNESSEE
IRVINE CA 92606
WHITE CHERYL TRUST 01-03 - 18
2772 ROOSEVELT ST
UNIT 357
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I DEYO RUTH E TRUST 02-13 - 22
I 268 3 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I THOMPSON FAMILY
1 TRUST 10-28 - 02
2691 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
I
, l
RYALL FAMILY TRUST 05-05-95
2697 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
CARLOS C ANTHONY REVOCABLE
TRUST 12 - 16 - 19
2703 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
GUPTA SANJAY
2711 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
CARLSBAD LAND PARTNERS LLC
264 PACIFIC AVE
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
DEWHURTS DAVID R
P O BOX 2510
CARLSBAD CA 92018
TREJO FAMILY TRUST 10 -2 2 -93
2687 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
JACKSON GARY L AND JACKSON
JUANA H
1359 WOODVIEW CT
OCEANSIDE CA 92056
F AND F ROOSEVELT ST LP
3636 NOBEL DR
STE 100
SAN DIEGO CA 92122
SOTO SOLEDAD M TRUST 03 -14-1 6
2615 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LLEWELLYN RYAN
2562 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ROBBINS KAREN C
2568 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
STAVRON BEVERLY A
2574 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BOLAND JENNIFER
2576 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
TASTE AND SEA VACATIONS LLC
136 HUMMINGBIRD HL
ENCINITAS CA 92024
FRANKLIN FAMILY
TRUST 04 - 30 - 90
2712 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I I
ROOSEVELT NINE LLC
2033 SAN ELIJO AVE
BOX 423
CARDIFF CA 92007
JARMOLOWI CZ EDWARDS AND
JEANMARIE
46 PERRY HENDERSON DR
FRAMINGHAM MA 00000
I I APODACA JOE p JR
2645 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SHEA PATRICK O AND SUE JIN 0
2605 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ALCANTAR MARTIN V AND MARIA I
I 2560 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LOPEZ LUISA
2570 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
DWYER CHRISTA
2580 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
ERGIN HS
PO BOX 218
CARLSBAD CA 92018
COOKIE TRUST 12-09-19
2650 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
HOENIG SETH
PO BOX 1958
CARLSBAD CA 92018
BARLOW KAREN J TRUST 07-11-90
2382 FARADAY AVE
I
STE 210
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I KATZ STAN S
PO BOX 235481
J ENCINITAS CA 92023
I
I
I
KEY 5 LLC
PO BOX 3030
LA JOLLA CA 92038
I
VASQUEZ ANGELINA
2564 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
RECINOS PEDRO E AND MYRNA Y
2566 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
PAGE THOMAS
2572 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SCHEXNAYDER JEANIE
2578 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
SD C PROPERTIES LL C
2155 RAMONA LN
VISTA CA 92084
WILSON LIVING TRUST 10-11-01
2710 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
BALAKER VICTOR AND ANGELA
3811 ALDER AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
FARLEY TIMOTHY R
PO BOX 1622
CARLSBAD CA 920 1 8
: HYSPAN PRECIS I ON PRODUCTS INC
I EMPLOYEE BENEFIT S TRUS
I P O BOX 636
VIS TA CA 92085
MORISON SONDRA KAND WATTS
JAMES B LIVING TRUST
2664 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LIEBERMAN FAMILY
TRUST 11 -02 - 04
300 CARLSBAD VI LLAGE DR
STE 108A
CARLSBAD CA 92008
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
2772 ROOSEVELT ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
1 INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 01
1 CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 04
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2 63 1 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 07
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
263 1 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 1 0
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT S T
SPC 13
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I
\
STROTHER 1 996 TRUST 10-17- 96
3811 MARGARET WAY
CARLSBAD CA 92008
LAGUNA B REEZE CONDOMINI UMS
L L C
1868 CREST D R
ENCI NI TAS CA 92024
I DESILVA FAMILY TRUST 01 - 16 - 06
2668 MADISON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I MACKEN FAMIL Y TRUST 1 0- 08 - 08
1 26364 PALM TREE LN
MURRI ETA CA 92563
NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY
TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD
810 MI SSIO N AVE
OCEANSI DE CA 92054
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 02
CARLSBAD CA 92008
IN FORMATION ONLY
263 1 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 05
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I I INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 08 i
i I
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I NFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 11
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 14
CARLSBAD CA 92008
OSULLI VAN DENNIS J FAMILY
TRUST 0 4-1 6- 92
8462 DEEPVI EW DR
HUNTI NGTN BCH CA 92646
KOUKI S PANDELI S AND EVANGELIA
2660 MADI SON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
1 BRANNI CK MONIKA
I
TRUST 12 - 27-21
2678 MADISON ST
I CARLSBAD CA 92008
MR CARLSBAD 11 LLC
1818 1ST AVE
STE 100
SAN DIEGO CA 9210 1
RICHARD AND RICHARD
CONSTRUCTION CO . INC
234 VENTURE ST
STE 100
SAN MARCOS CA 92078
I I INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 03 I
I
I I
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATI ON ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 06
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 09
CARLSBAD CA 92008
I NFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT S T
SPC 12
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATI ON ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 1 5
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2 631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 16
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 19
2ARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
3PC 22
:ARLSBAD CA 92008
CNFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
3PC 12A
:ARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 17
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 20
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 2A
CARLSBAD CA 92008
- 250 PRINTED -
* DUPLICATE OWNERS COMBINED
INTO A SINGLE LABEL
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 18
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC 21
CARLSBAD CA 92008
INFORMATION ONLY
2631 ROOSEVELT ST
SPC llA
CARLSBAD CA 92008
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
The Roosevelt
Kyle Van Leeuwen, Senior Planner
Community Development
July 29, 2025
SDP 2024-0001
1 Project Location
2 • 0.46-acre lot
• Village General District
• Existing Commercial
Building (8,000 sf)
2 Project Features
23 Apartment Units
5,400 SF Commercial Space
Four-Story Building
Density Bonuses
- 50% for 2 Very-Low Units
- 50% for 2 Moderate Units
- 2 Concessions – 8 Waivers
The Roosevelt
3 3
Village & Barrio Objective Design
Standards (ODS)
The Roosevelt
4 4
• California
Contemporary
architectural design
• Project complies with
ODS (5 waivers)
Site Design & Amenities
Ground Floor
• 5 Tenant Spaces
• Lobby/Entrance
• Pedestrian “Alley”
• 24 Res. Parking Spaces
3rd Story
• 13 Res. Units
- 4 w/ upstairs rooms
& decks (4th story)
The Roosevelt
5 5
2nd Story
• 2 Office Suites
• 10 Res. Units
• Open Courtyard
• Bike Storage
The Roosevelt
6 6
Density Bonus Calculation
The Roosevelt
7 7
• Base Density:
23 DU/AC X 0.46 AC = 11 units (10.58)
• 2 Units Very-Low-Income (15% Base)
= 50% Bonus Density; AND
• 2 Units Moderate-Income (15% Base)
= 50% Bonus Density
• 11 Units X 50% = 6 Units (5.5)
• 11 units + 6 units + 6 units = 23 units
STATE DENSITY
BONUS LAW
Concession/Incentive
The Roosevelt
8 8
1. Concession to waive the requirement that the
current water main servicing the property be
upsized from a six-inch water main to an
eight-inch water main.
2. Concession to waive all commercial parking
requirements.
STATE DENSITY
BONUS LAW
Waivers of Dev. Standards
The Roosevelt
9 9
1. 5-foot minimum front setback
2. 35-foot, 3-story height limit
3. Parking stall dimension requirements
4. ODS - Prohibition on Large-Mixed use building
type in Village General District
STATE DENSITY
BONUS LAW
Waivers of Dev. Standards
The Roosevelt
10 10
5. ODS - 50% of floor area face primary street
6. ODS - 75% ground floor window frontage
7. ODS - Upper stories to occupy full ground floor
footprint
8. ODS - 90% glazed transparent and clear
shopfront façade
STATE DENSITY
BONUS LAW
Project Consistency
• General Plan (V-B, Village-Barrio)
• Zoning Ordinance (V-B, Village-Barrio)
• Village & Barrio Master Plan (Village General)
• State Density Bonus Law
- Planning Comm. Recommendation 4-0-3
The Roosevelt
11 CEQA Exemption
Staff has reviewed the scope of the project and
applicable studies and finds that the project
belongs to a class of projects that categorically
exempt from the requirement for the preparation
of environmental documents (CEQA §15332 - In-
Fill Development Projects)
The Roosevelt
12 Recommended Action
Adopt the resolution approving a CEQA
Exemption Determination and Site Development
Plan as described in the staff report.
The Roosevelt
13 Carlsbad City Council
July 29, 2025
LO C AL IN VES TMEN T
b y FABRIC
LO C AL IN VES TMEN T
b y FABRIC
RECEN T EXP ERIEN CE
THE FLATS | S O UTH O CEAN S IDE
THE RO O S EVELT
- 0.49 acre interior lot – VG Zone VBMP
- New development is largely 3 -story with a section of the building on the western portion increasing to 4 -story (lofts) - 23 residential (for lease) units includes 2 very -low income units and 2 moderate -income units (17.5% affordable) - 20 one bedroom units, 3 two bedroom units
- 2 small creative office units on 2 nd floor, 5 small retail spaces on ground floor public/private plaza – approx. 5,000 sf - 24 car garage at grade dedicated to residential units 2621 Roosevelt Street | Carlsbad,
CA 92008
SDP2024 -0001
VBMP : Village General
THE RO O S EVELT
THE RO O S EVELT
ELEVATION INFORMATION
4 story concrete and wood structure
Height from Level 1 to top of parapet - 45'-0"
Mechanical equipment shall be equal to or less than the parapet height in most locations and fully screened in a few locations where parapet is lower Large courtyard provided on the north side of the apartment complex Commercial plaza on north side of property that doubles as a fire lane MATERIALITY - Designed with longevity and simplicity in mind Vertical Composite Siding - (exterior walls & roof parapet facing Roosevelt) Real Wood Siding - (deck walls & ceilings facing Roosevelt) Hemlock T&G siding with clear sealer
elevations
CMU - (south side of street facade facing Roosevelt)
bead blasted finish on a warm gray block
Smooth Stucco Finish - (Residential units)
smooth acrylic stucco with an off -white finish (based on a historic white)
Terracotta - (stairwells on the south facade / retail facade / breeze blocks) Natural color of the material
THE RO O S EVELT
site p la n
THE RO O S EVELT
p a r k in g
T here are hundreds of
publ i c parki ng spac es
wi thi n 1 / 4 mi l e of the
subj ect property.
T he retai l i s desi gned to be
nei ghborhood servi ng to
encourage al ternati ve
m o b ility (w a lk in g , b ik e s,
publ i c transport)
Pa r k in g w a s m a x im ize d
gi ven si te constrai nts.
To ta l Pa r k in g Sta lls = 2 4
ADA Pa r k in g = 1 sta ll
EV P a r k in g = 11 EV C S
Bik e Pa r k in g
Short term = 6
Resi dent = 1 0
THE RO O S EVELT
zoni ng
B. Village General District (VG)
T he V i llage General Di stri ct provi des an opportuni ty to ex pand the mi x of commerci al and resi denti al uses i nto a broader geographi c area i n the north part of the V i llage, roughly from R oosevelt Street east to Jefferson Street. Bui ldi ngs may be attached or detached, and located near the front property line, or allow for an area for either small courtyards, outdoor di ni ng or open space, and/or addi ti onal l andscapi ng. R esi denti al and commerci al uses may exi st si de -by -s id e o r in a m ixe d-use format.
THE RO O S EVELT
L andsc api ng - B asi s of D esi gn onl y
Native species | Drought tolerant | Lush Planting
Creating an inviting public plaza area that acts
like a piazza around the retail
Creating a space for placemaking, community
gatherings, public art, etc.
Q&A
Q&A