Meeting Date: Sept. 8, 2026
To: Legislative Subcommittee
From: Jason Haber, Intergovernmental Affairs Director
Staff Contact: Jason Haber, Intergovernmental Affairs Director [email protected], 442-339-2958
Subject: Legislative and Advocacy Update
District: All
Recommended Action
Receive updates on federal and state legislative and budget activity and the city’s recent and ongoing advocacy efforts; discuss and provide feedback to staff, including identifying high- priority bills, advocacy positions, funding opportunities, and items for future City Council consideration.
Discussion
Staff and the city’s contract lobbyists – Federal: Carpi & Clay Government Relations / State:
California Public Policy Group – will present updates and overviews of federal and state legislative and budget activity and the priority legislation and intergovernmental matters being tracked on behalf of the city (Exhibits 1 through 3).
In ac
cordance with City Council Policy 39 and the city’s Legislative Platform, the city signed onto two coalition advocacy letters without prior consideration by the Legislative Subcommittee. The first was an Aug. 10, 2026, letter developed by the California Association of Joint Powers Authorities regarding the urgent need for comprehensive tort reform to protect California taxpayers, survivors, and essential public services (Exhibit 4). The second letter, dated Aug. 27, 2026, was developed by Cal Cities in opposition to a then-forthcoming wildfire liability reform package that would limit public agency recovery (Exhibit 5). Both these issues and the results of these advocacy efforts are discussed further in Exhibit 2.
The Subcommittee is requested to provide feedback to help city staff and the city’s lobbying consultants focus the city’s advocacy efforts on high-priority bills and to identify bills for future City Council consideration.
Next Steps
Staff and the city’s contract lobbyists will monitor, evaluate, and engage the Legislative Subcommittee in a discussion of legislative activity and proposed measures that may impact
LEGISLATIVE SUBCOMMITTEE
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 1 of 92
city operations and policy priorities throughout the legislative session.
If the Legislative Subcommittee decides to refer any matters to the City Council, staff will work with the City Manager to place an item on a future City Council agenda for consideration.
Exhibits
1. Carpi & Clay Government Relations – Federal Monthly Update, Aug. 31, 2026
2. California Public Policy Group Legislative Summary – August 2026
3. California Public Policy Group – Priority State Legislation as of Sept. 3, 2026
4. CAJPA Tort Reform Support Letter – Aug. 10, 2026
5. Cal Cities Wildfire Liability Reform Opposition Letter – Aug. 27, 2026 Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 2 of 92
1 August 31, 2026
City of
Carlsbad
Federal Update
www.carpiclay.com
Fiscal Year 2027 Appropriations Update
On August 8, the Senate passed a continuing resolution (CR) (H.R. 6500) by a 90– 6 vote, setting aside the version the House passed last month. The CR would extend federal government funding at FY26 levels through December 11. The CR also includes several program extensions, including surface transportation authorities, national flood insurance, and extending the availability of housing voucher and homelessness assistance funding. The CR would also delay the implementation of OMB ’s proposed rule overhauling the Uniform Guidance governing federal grant administration published on May 29. The Senate adjourned for its traditional recess after passage of the bill and is scheduled to return on September 14.
The House will reconvene on August 31 and is expected to take up consideration of the Senate- passed CR this week.
FHWA Publishes PROTECT Competitive Grant Program NOFO
On August 27, t
he Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published a notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) for $788 million through the Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost -saving Transportation (PROTECT) Competitive Grant Program. Funding is available for planning, resilience improvements, evacuation routes, and at-risk coastal infrastructure. Eligible applicants include states, metropolitan planning organizations, local governments, federally recognized Indian Tribes, public transportation agencies, port authorities, and certain Federal Land Managing Agencies. Applications are due October 9, and applicants that applied under the October 2024 NOFO must reapply.
DOI Fin
alizes Post-2026 Colorado River Operating Guidelines
On August 21, S
ecretary of the Interior Doug Burgum signed the 2027- 2028 Operating Guidelines and Record of Decision for the Post -2026 Colorado River Operations Final Environmental Impact Statement, establishing a 10-year Decision Framework that will guide future operational guidelines for Lake Powell and Lake Mead. The guidelines set a minimum Lake Powell elevation of 3,510 feet to protect Glen Canyon Dam infrastructure and require Lower Basin States to reduce Colorado River water deliveries by 1.25 million acre-feet annually over the next two years, with proposed state- specific reductions of 760,000 acre- feet for Arizona, 440,000 acre -feet for California, and 50,000 acre- feet for Nevada if the stat es implement their proposed sharing agreement. The guidelines also call for Lower Basin States Exhibit 1
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 3 of 92
2 www.carpiclay.com
to voluntarily conserve and store at least 700,000 acre- feet over the two -year period, and authorize the Secretary to work with Upper Basin States on using the Colorado River Storage Project’s Aspinall, Flaming Gorge, and Navajo reservoirs to help protect Glen Canyon Dam.
Reclamation’s accompanying August 2026 24-Month Study places Lake Powell operations in the Lower Elevation Infrastructure Protection Range for the water year beginning October 1, with an expected release between 6.0 and 7.0 million acre-feet, subject to adjustment through April.
LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITY
Senate Confirms Slate of Trump Administration Nominees. On August 7, the Senate confirmed 74 nominees by an en bloc vote of 51– 47, including Cameron Hamilton as Administrator of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) ; Kevin Lilly as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Fish and Wildlife; William Hague as an Assistant Secretary of the Interior; and Kaveh Farzad as an Assistant Secretary of Energy for International Affairs.
Separately, the Senate confirmed Todd Blanche as Attorney General on August 8 by a vote of 50–49, and Erica Schwartz as Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on August 5 by a vote of 51–44.
Senate
Passes Disaster Tax Relief Bill. On August 7, the Senate passed the Doug LaMalfa Federal Disaster Tax Relief Certainty Act (H.R. 5366), sending it to the President for signature.
The bill would codify and extend tax relief for individuals affected by federally declared major disasters occurring between December 28, 2019, and January 1, 2027, preserving the reduced adjusted gross income threshold for qualified disaster losses and allowing taxpayers who do not itemize deductions to claim those losses. It also would create a new Internal Revenue Code provision excluding from gross income certain compensation received for losses, expenses, or damages resulting from federally declared wildfire disasters occurring between December 31, 2014, and January 1, 2027, including additional living expenses, lost wages, personal injury, death, or emotional distress, to the extent not otherwise covered by insurance.
Bipar
tisan Bill Introduced to Extend FEMA Wage Reimbursement Window for Disaster Rebuilding. On August 6, Senators Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Joni Ernst (R-IA) introduced the Reducing Red Tape for Rebuilding Act (S. 5276), which would extend the period during which recipients may use FEMA funds for base and overtime wages tied to substantial damage determinations and building code implementation and enforcement. Under current law, wage eligibility for these activities is tied to a 180-day window following a disaster declaration; the bill would extend this to a period of up to two years.
Bill
Introduced to Establish Cybersecurity Requirements for Water and Wastewater Systems. On August 7, Senators Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) introduced the Water Cyber Shield Act (S. 5368), which would require large drinking water and wastewater systems to incorporate cybersecurity risk assessments into their existing risk and resilience plans. The bill would direct the Environmental Protection Agency , the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency , and the National Institute of Standards and Technology , to establish baseline cybersecurity standards, authorize states to conduct cybersecurity Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 4 of 92
3 www.carpiclay.com
assessments and assume primary enforcement responsibility, and extend federal cyber incident reporting requirements to previously exempt state and locally owned water systems.
Additionally, the bill authorizes $300 million in funding annually through FY32 for cybersecurity assistance to water utilities.
Bill I
ntroduced to Standardize AV Protocol During Emergencies. On August 3, Rep. Kevin Mullin (D-CA) introduced the AV Emergency Response Coordination Act (H.R. 10033), which would direct the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to establish minimum national standards for how autonomous vehicle (AV) operators coordinate with emergency responders. The bill would require AV companies to submit standardized emergency response guides to NHTSA and local agencies, maintain a 24/7 emergency hotline, and comply with “geofence notices” allowing officials to direct AVs to avoid an area for up to 72 hours during an emergency.
Bill Introd
uced to Guarantee Right to Counsel in Immigration Proceedings. On August 6, Sen. Adam Schiff (D -CA) introduced the Fairness to Freedom Act ( S. 5324) , which would guarantee government-funded legal representation for individuals unable to afford counsel who are facing deportation, bond hearings, expedited removal, or related immigration proceedings before U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, state courts, or federal courts. The bill creates a new, independent nonprofit corporation, the Office of Immigration Representation, governed by a 24-member board appointed initially by federal appellate court chief judges, to administer local public defender organizations, contract with community defend er organizations, and establish attorney panels nationwide. Rep. Norma Torres (D-CA) introduced companion legislation (H.R. 3127) in the House last year.
CONGRESSIONAL LETTERS
House T&
I Democrats Press DOT on Grant Terminations. On August 12, House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Ranking Member Rick Larsen (D-WA) and all Committee Democrats sent a letter to Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy alleging that DOT has terminated or withheld grants based on the political affiliation of recipient states. Citing recent court filings and news reports, the lawmakers pointed to canceled or delayed funding for projects in several states and requested detailed information on all grants terminated or rescinded since January 20, 2025, including the stated basis for each action and whether a recipient's political identity was considered in the decision.
Democrat
s Urge Action on Capital Investment Grants Projects. On August 11, House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Ranking Member Rick Larsen (D -WA) and Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) led more than 40 lawmakers in a letter to OMB Director Russell Vought and FTA Acting Deputy Administrator Matthew Cahill raising concerns over delays advancing transit projects in the Capital Investment Grants (CIG) pipeline. The lawmakers note FTA has more than $1.9 billion in unobligated CIG funds available and cite reporting that no new CIG grant agreement has been signed since President Trump took office. The letter requests a timeline for advancing Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 5 of 92
4 www.carpiclay.com
the Boston and Los Angeles projects and calls for expeditious approval of 11 other CIG projects anticipating grant agreements this year.
Lawmakers U
rge CPSC to Establish Comprehensive Safety Standards for E -Bikes and E-Motos. Representatives Dave Min (D-CA), Michael Lawler (R-NY), Jared Huffman (D-CA), and Brian Fitzpatrick (R -PA) sent a letter to Acting Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) Chairman Peter Feldman urging the Commission to develop comprehensive safety standards for electric bicycles and electric motorcycles beyond its current focus on lithium -ion battery fire hazards. The letter cites CPSC injury surveillance data showing e-bike and e-moto- related injuries rose nearly tenfold between 2019 and 2022 and notes the Commission has not substantively updated e -bike safety standards since 2002 and has never adopted standards for off-road e-motos. The lawmakers call on CPSC to establish minimum manufacturer labeling requirements disclosing maximum speed, motor power, and minimum age recommendations; update the e-bike definition to create distinct product classifications that separate e-bikes from higher-speed e-motos; and support local governments with data collection and public education resources.
FEDERAL FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
DOJ Opens
FY26 Byrne JAG Local Formula Funding Opportunity. On August 25, the Department of Justice’ s (DOJ) Bureau of Justice Assistance announced the availability of $96.5 million in local formula f unding through the FY26 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. Applications are due October 9 in Grants.gov and October 16 in JustGrants. Funds may be used for law enforcement personnel, equipment, and technology; prosecution and court programs; drug treatment; mental health and crisis intervention programs; and unmanned aircraft systems and counter -UAS technology. The NOFO also prohibits recipients from using funds to impede federal immigration enforcement or provide legal services to individuals unlawfully present in the United States, with limited exceptions.
FHWA Publ
ishes Stopping Threats on Pedestrian Grant NOFO. FHWA has published a NOFO for the availability of $5 million through the Stopping Threats on Pedestrian Competitive Grant Program or Bollards Program. The purpose of this program is to provide funding for bollard installation projects designed to prevent pedestrian injuries and acts of terrorism in areas used by large numbers of pedestrians. Eligible applicants under the Bollards Program are State departments of transportation and local government entities. Applications are due September 9.
FHWA Pub
lishes ADCMS NOFO. FHWA has published a NOFO for the availability of $34 million through the Advanced Digital Construction Management Systems (ADCMS) grant program. The program provides funding to promote, implement, deploy, demonstrate, showcase, support, and document the application of new technology in construction projects at a program level. Eligible applicants under the ADCMS Competitive Grant Program are State DOTs, including the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. State DOTs Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 6 of 92
5 www.carpiclay.com
are permitted to submit joint applications with other State DOTs and non-State DOTs, including local governments, Tribes, and private industry. Applications are due September 16.
FTA Pu
blishes Bus Safety, Accessibility, and Innovation NOFO. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has published a NOFO for the availability of $10 million under the Bus Safety, Accessibility, and Innovation Research Program. Funds will be awarded to up to two projects to develop and prototype innovative and widely deployable concepts that are intended to make existing and new buses safer for their operators and vulnerable road users, and safer and more accessible for their passengers. Applications are due September 28.
FEDERAL FUNDING AWARDS
FAA An
nounces AIP Grant Awards. FAA has announced $615 million to 238 airport projects across the country through the Airport Improvement Program (AIP). The grants will help fund infrastructure projects at airports such as runways, taxiways, signage, lighting, markings and other safety-related needs.
FRA Annou
nces FSP Grant Awards. FRA has announced $5.3 billion to 41 projects across the country through the Federal -State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail Program for Projects not located along the Northeast Corridor. The grants help fund projects that enhance safety, reduce the State of Good Repair backlog, improve performance, or expand or establish new intercity passenger rail service.
FEDERAL AGENCY ACTIONS AND PERSONNEL CHANGES
Supreme
Court Stays Injunction Against President Trump Election Executive Order. On August 24, the Supreme Court stayed a district court injunction blocking Executive Order 14399, allowing the Administration to move forward while litigation continues. The Court concluded the states were unlikely to establish standing at this stage because implementation depends on future agency actions. Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissented, arguing the order could impose immediate burdens on states. A separate nationwide injunction blocking the Postal Service from implementing certain mail -in ballot provisions remains in effect.
DOT Rel
eases Updated NRSS. DOT has released its updated National Roadway Safety Strategy (NRSS), outlining actions through 2028 to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries.
The strategy focuses on impaired, speeding, and unsafe commercial drivers; rural and Tribal communities; emergency response; safer roadway design; expanded truck par king; and broader deployment of vehicle safety technologies and automated vehicles. Organized around the principles of "Safer People, Safer Roads, and Safer Vehicles," the strategy also calls for incorporating advanced crash- test dummies into federal safety standards and highlights pedestrian-detecting automatic emergency braking, improved nighttime visibility, FTA safety oversight, transit worker safety, and commercial vehicle enforcement.
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 7 of 92
6 www.carpiclay.com
DOT Releases
AGCC Initiative RFI. On August 18, DOT's Build America Bureau published a Request for Information (RFI) on its proposed America's Great Corridors of Commerce (AGCC) initiative, which would encourage public -private partnerships to colocate utility and telecommunications infrastructure within highway and rail rights -of-way. Designated corridors would receive federal technical assistance, expedited permitting, and streamlined access to financing programs, including TIFIA and RRIF. Comments on the proposal are due September
12. DOT Pu
blishes Rail Passenger Liability Cap Adjustment. DOT has published an adjustment to the rail passenger transportation liability cap as required the 2015 Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act . Pursuant to the FAST Act , the rail passenger transportation liability cap is raised to $401,900,000. The adjustment is effective September 4.
EPA Rel
eases Implementation Guidance on Lead Pipe Replacement Requirements. On August 21, EPA released two guidance documents to assist states and drinking water systems in implementing the 2024 Lead and Copper Rule Improvements. The guidance provides plain-language explanations, definitions, and examples to support lead service line identification and replacement and reflects public comments received earlier this year. EPA also updated its online lead resources, launched a webpage focused on lead and children's health, and continues to provide technical assistance through its Real Water Technical Assistance program. Separately, EPA announced nearly $3 billion in funding this year to support lead service line identification and replacement.
EPA Rel
eases Protocol for Fluoride Health Toxicity Assessment. On August 3, EPA released its Protocol for Developing the Fluoride Human Health Toxicity Assessment, an expanded roadmap for evaluating potential health risks of fluoride under the Safe Drinking Water Act. EPA plans to develop a toxicity assessment identifying fluoride exposure levels that can be tolerated without harmful health effects, which will be published for public comment once complete. The findings will inform potential revisions to EPA ’s fluoride drinking water standards and CDC recommendations on fluoride levels. EPA currently regulates fluoride at a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 4 ppm and a non-enforceable secondary MCL of 2 ppm, while HHS recommends a concentration of 0.7 ppm for community water systems. The Protocol follows the 2024 federal court ruling in Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. EPA , which found that fluoride in drinking water poses an unreasonable risk to children.
EPA Rel
eases Systemic Issues Checklist for State Drinking Water Agencies. On August 13, EPA released a voluntary guidance document for state drinking water agencies to identify, track, and resolve “ systemic issues” at public water systems , such as source water nearing capacity, malfunctioning treatment equipment, or frequent water main breaks that could disrupt water service if unaddressed.
EPA Annou
nces Local Government Advisory Committee Relaunch. On August 12, EPA announced the relaunch of the Local Government Advisory Committee (LGAC), a 22-member advisory group of state and local officials chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act in 1993 to provide independent policy advice to the EPA Administrator. LGAC ’s membership Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 8 of 92
7 www.carpiclay.com
includes 13 newly appointed members and 9 reappointments. The LGAC will discuss challenges local governments face in siting and developing AI infrastructure and data centers, with a virtual public meeting in September.
FAA An
nounces Environmental Assessment Decision on UAS Package Delivery. FAA has announced the availability of the Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact/Record of Decision, following the FAA ’s evaluation of the potential environmental effects of its decision related to unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) package delivery operations in the United States.
FAA Pu
blishes Interference-Tolerant Radio Altimeter Systems Final Rule. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has published a final rule establishing minimum performance standards for aircraft radio altimeters to ensure they can withstand interference from adjacent C-band wireless signals. The rule, which supports the Federal Communications Commission's July 2026 decision to make additional Upper C-band spectrum available for wireless services, requires most commercial aircraft to comply by December 30, 2030, with all remaining covered aircraft required to comply by October 31, 2034. The rule takes effect September 29.
FAA Ad
vances Digital Departure Clearances for GA. FAA has announced it is moving forward with Mobile Clearance, a new digital tool that will allow general aviation (GA) pilots to request departure clearances through approved flight applications instead of over the radio.
Mobile Clearance allows pilots to use the ForeFlight and Garmin applications to request Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) departure clearances with a few taps on a phone or tablet.
Beginning in August, Mobile Clearance will also allow pilots to cancel IFR through their flight applications, helping them transition to Visual Flight Rules while allowing controllers to focus on aircraft separation.
FCC Pr
oposes Review of E -Rate Program Scope, CIPA Interpretation, and Program Integrity. On August 14, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on potential changes to the E -Rate program, including narrowing eligibility, eliminating funding for certain broadband infrastructure, and revising support for schools, libraries, and early childhood programs. The proposal also examines updates to Children's Internet Protection Act requirements and would establish new oversight and anti -fraud measures for third- party E -Rate consultants. Comments are due October 13, with reply comments due November 12.
FEMA I
ssues FY26 Election Security Requirements for HSGP Grants. On August 10, FEMA released guidance requiring states to meet five election security conditions to receive their full FY26 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) award. Requirements include transitioning to hand- marked paper ballots, conducting post -election audits, reconciling voter participation records, verifying voter and election worker citizenship, and complying with related DHS verification procedures. FEMA will withhold 20% of HSGP funding until the Department verifies compliance.
FRA Publi
shes High -Speed Noise Emissions Standards NPRM. The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), which would Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 9 of 92
8 www.carpiclay.com
amend the noise emission regulations to address the unique noise emission characteristics of trains operating at speeds exceeding 160 miles per hour (mph). Specifically, the proposed regulation would provide an alternative standard for noise emissions from train operations exceeding 160 mph, up to 220 mph, and also provide a special approval process for noise emissions from train operations exceeding 220 mph. This alternative noise emission standard and compliance process would effectively remove an existing regulatory barrier to the railroad industry for high- speed rail operations, while continuing to protect public health and welfare.
Existing noise emission limits for all train operations at speeds up to 160 mph would continue to apply, and these existing limits would remain available for demonstrating compliance at higher speeds as well. Comments are due October 2.
HUD’s Conti
nuum of Care NOFO Vacated by Federal Court. On August 7, Judge Mary S.
McElroy of the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island vacated the Department of Housing and Urban Development ’s ( HUD) June 2026 n otice of funding opportunity for the Continuum of Care (CoC) Program, ruling that HUD violated the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to conduct the notice- and-comment process required under the McKinney -Vento Homeless Assistance Act. The NOFO had shifted away from the “ Housing First” approach by creating a $1.3 billion set -aside prioritizing new transitional housing and supportive-services projects, which plaintiffs argued would divert funding from the roughly 90% of CoC funds historically protected as non- competitive permanent-housing renewals. The court found this set-aside qualified as an incentive for a type of activity that by statute required public notice and comment, which HUD did not provide, rejecting HUD ’s arguments that the set-aside was not an “incentive,” that the statute gave it discretion to bypass the process, and that its general public announcements were sufficient. The ruling requires HUD to rescind the NOFO entirely, though the court declined to permanently enjoin HUD from reissuing similar terms in the future through proper notice -and-comment procedures, and did not reach plaintiffs ’ other claims regarding the NOFO’s selection criteria or related OMB funding restrictions. HUD is appealing this ruling.
HUD Seeks
Comment on CDBG-DR Allocation Formula. On August 13, HUD published a notice seeking public comment on its Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) allocation formula, as required by Section 504 of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act. HUD is considering changes to how it calculates housing, infrastructure, and economic revitalization needs, defines the most impacted areas, and determines grantee capacity and mitigation funding. Comments are due September 14.
ONDCP, HHS,
HUD Release “Treatment First” Toolkit on Homelessness and Addiction.
On August 12, 2026, the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, HHS, and HUD released the “Best Practices Toolkit: Addressing Homelessness and Addiction Through Treatment First.” The toolkit promotes a “ Treatment First” model that prioritizes coordinated engagement in evidence- based substance use treatment and recovery support services, in contrast to “Housing First” approaches, which the toolkit’s authors argue have not sufficiently integrated addiction treatment. It outlines core practices including phased housing, peer recovery specialists, and standardized outcome measurement across phases from crisis to long-term recovery; community responses to homeless encampments; guidance on identifying and supporting children in households affected by parental substance use; and an overview of Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 10 of 92
9 www.carpiclay.com
federal funding sources across HUD, VA, and HHS programs relevant to homelessness and addiction services.
## ## ##
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 11 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 1 Date: September 2, 2026
To: Jason Haber, Intergovernmental Affairs Director
Cindie McMahon, City Attorney
City of Carlsbad
From: Sharon Gonsalves
Managing Director
California Public Policy Group
Re: CPPG Legislative Summary: August 2026
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Legislature Closes Out Second Year of 2025-26 Session
The Legislature closed out its second year of the 2025 -26 legislative session around noon on September 1. Although the final day of the second year of the two -year session was scheduled for August 31, the Legislature waived its standing rules to permit amendments beyond the deadline and to extend its session by one day to take up several bills amended on the m orning of August 29. The extension ensured compliance with a provision of the California Constitution requiring that any bill be available online for at least 72 hours before a final vote.
The final four weeks of session were hectic, with the Legislature moving at a rushed pace to take up measures still in motion so that bills could reach the Floor by August 14, the last day for fiscal committees to meet and report bills to the Floor. Floor sessions were held nearly every day, with hundreds of bills advancing through the Legislature on or before the final day of session. The period from August 17 through August 31 was reserved exclusively for Floor sessions, with the exception of “off the floor ” hearings, in which a committee chair convenes an impromptu hearing in a nearby committee room while the Floor session is underway.
Bills that passed the Legislature by the final deadline of August 31 now await action by Governor Gavin Newsom, who has until September 30 to sign or veto them . Although the Governor must ordinarily sign or veto a bill within 12 days of its passage by the Legislature, this window is extended to 30 days for bills passed during the final two weeks of session. A full picture of how legislation fared in 2026 will ther efore not emerge until September 30. Should the Governor take no action by the deadline, a bill becomes law by default—an option not exercised during Governor Newsom’s tenure thus far. Unless otherwise specified, newly enacted laws take effect on January 1, 2027.
During 2026, a total of 2, 232 measures were introduced, with 1,385 bills advancing through the Legislature to reach the Governor ’s desk for consideration. This ratio is generally consistent with prior years of Governor Newsom ’s tenure. As of September 2, 987 bills remain pending on the Governor’s desk, while 398 have been chaptered and zero have been vetoed.
The interval between the final day of session this year and the first day of session next year—formally designated the “Final Recess”—is the period during which legislators establish their priorities for the coming year and prepare new legislation for introduction. The Legislature will formally adjourn the 2025-26 legislative session sine die on November 30. This period likewise affords agencies an Exhibit 2
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 12 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 2 opportunity to review their legislative platforms, evaluate potential bill sponsorship, and consider state budget requests for the year ahead. The 2026 General Election will be held on November 3, with half of the Senate and the entire Assembly standing fo r election. The newly constituted Legislature will open the 2027 -28 legislative session by convening for Organizational Session on December 7. This single -day meeting is when each house elects its leadership and introduces an initial round of legislation. All legislators elected on November 3 are also formally sworn in on this day by their respective houses.
Wildfire Liability Proposal
In mid -August, news broke that the Governor was pursuing major changes to wildfire insurance policy before the end of the legislative session on August 31. Among other provisions, the draft proposal would have limited public agencies ’ ability to recover property tax losses resulting from utility-caused wildfires and would have eliminated or restricted subrogation rights against an investor-owned utility found to be at fault for a wildfire. Local governments, insurance companies, and consumer advocates quickly rallied in opposition to the draft proposal.
Following a deluge of counterproposals and counter -counterproposals among the Governor, Assembly, and Senate, the Governor announced in a press release early on August 29 that his office, the Assembly, and the Senate had reached a deal on a proposal. The resulting bill, SB 492 (Becker), was introduced at 7:30 a.m. on August 29, after the official deadline to amend bills before the end of the session. As introduced, the bill did not include any limits on local government recovery or subrogation rights. On Monday, August 31, investor-owned utility stock prices plunged on the belief that, absent limits on recovery and restrictions on subrogation, investor -owned utilities could face bankruptcy or be forced to borrow large sums to remain solvent. On Tuesday, September 1, the deal collapsed as Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas (D-Hollister) announced in a press release that SB 492 would not advance out of the Assembly, halting the bill ’s progress in 2026. There has been discussion of a special session in the fall; however, it remains unclear whether one will materialize given that this is an election year and Governor Newsom is termed out.
Tort Reform
An effort to enact public agency tort reform surfaced this year, with dozens of agencies signing onto a coalition letter calling primarily for 1) caps on damages; 2) a higher threshold for evidence in older case; and 3) shorter statute of limitations. More information on the effort can be found here.
In late August, SB 577 (Laird) was amended to revise the civil procedures governing claims against public entities. The bill offers protections that apply to public entities statewide, including exempting them from treble “cover up” damages, imposing a heightened gross negligence standard and stricter certificate of merit and filing rules for plaintiffs over 40, guiding courts on reducing excessive awards, and streamlining the bonds that agencies use to finance judgments and settleme nts. It also incorporates several public finance and school district fiscal provisions drawn from the County Office Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team’s January 2025 report.
Notably, the bill includes one provision specific to Los Angeles County —which recently reached a roughly $4 billion settlement over abuse at its MacLaren Children’s Center and probation facilities— barring new claims tied to those closed facilities after January 1, 2026. The bill further clarifies the rules governing joint and several liability in all civil actions filed against public entities, providing that a public entity may be held jointly liable only if it is apportioned 15 percent or more of the overall Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 13 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 3 fault. The bill is a negotiated product on which many stakeholders remain neutral, though it draws opposition from both some victim advocates and some local agencies—the former viewing it as too restrictive of survivors, the latter as insufficiently protective of public budgets.
Many local government associations, however, regarded the bill’s changes as minor, arguing that the bill “does not make substantive changes sufficient to address either the fiscal crisis and ongoing liability exposure created by AB 218 or California’s rapidly escalating general -liability environment” and “does not limit what plaintiffs’ attorneys take from taxpayer-funded settlements.” SB 577 is now on the Governor’s desk awaiting signature or veto.
Data Centers
The Legislature closed the session by passing a seven -bill package aimed at California ’s fast - growing data center industry, sending all seven measures to the Governor. Three bills address utility rates and cost allocation: SB 886 (Padilla) and AB 2383 (Zbur), both substantially amended in a late- session compromise, would require the CPUC and investor -owned utilities to establish new tariffs so data centers cover the grid, transmission, and related costs they trigger rather than shifting them to other ratepayers, and SB 1168 (McNerney) directs the CPUC to study those cost shifts and map where facilities can interconnect without costly upgrades. The remaining four add environmental review and disclosure: SB 887 (Padilla) eliminates categorical CEQA exemptions for data centers while offering a fast-track for projects that meet clean energy and water standards, AB 1577 (Bauer- Kahan) requires monthly energy and water reporting to the Energy Commission, and AB 2469 and AB 2619 (both Papan) add water use disclosures, with AB 2469 conditioning local permit approvals on that information.
The package drew heavy lobbying from technology and business groups, who argued the requirements would push investment to other states, and strong support from ratepayer and environmental advocates. Notably, the CEQA and water bills will impact local governments directly by adding review steps and permit conditions to data center approvals.
Budget Update
On August 28, AB 113 , a budget trailer bill, came into print. The bill contains numerous appropriations under the 2026 Budget Act, including allocations for the Climate Bond and Proposition 36 (both approved by voters in 2024). The bill will soon be signed into law by the Governor and, as a budget-related measure, will take effect immediately upon enactment.
BILLS OF INTEREST ON THE GOVERNOR’S DESK OR RECENTLY CHAPTERED E-Bikes
• AB 1569 (Davies) Pupil safety: electric bicycle: safety and training program. o This bill requires the California Department of Education, in consultation with the Department of the California Highway Patrol, to develop a standardized e-bike safety and training program for pupils in grades 7 to 12, inclusive. o Status: Chaptered
• AB 1614 (Dixon) Vehicles: bicycles.
o This bill requires all bicycle operators and passengers be properly seated when riding on Class 1 bikeways.
o Status: Chaptered
• AB 2346 (Wilson) Vehicles: electric bicycles and speed limits.
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 14 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 4 o This bill sets speed limits for e-bikes and bicycle paths, requires certain disclosures when selling an e-bike, and requires some e-bikes to have a speedometer and lights. o Status: Governor’s Desk
• AB 2595 (Papan) San Mateo Electric Bicycle Safety Pilot Program. o This bill establishes an electric bicycle enforcement pilot program in San Mateo County allowing the County or local authorities to prohibit a person under 12 years of age from operating a class 1 or class 2 electric bicycle until January 1, 2031. The bill requires a report submitted to the Legislature by January 1, 2030 that details enforcement of the ordinance and changes, if any, in electric bicycle collisions and injuries.
o Status: Governor’s Desk
• SB 1167 (Blakespear) Vehicles: electric bicycles.
o This bill updates the labeling and disclosure requirements for manufacturers and sellers of these devices, and prohibits noncompliant vehicles from being advertised as e -bikes. The bill also establishes new operational and safety requirements and imposes additional reporting requirements on law enforcement. The bill also extends the definition of “off-highway motor vehicle subject to identification ” to include mopeds and off-highway electric motorcycles.
o Status: Governor’s Desk
Governmental Operations
• AB 1383 (McKinnor) Public employees’ retirement benefits. o This bill makes prospective changes to the Public Employees ’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) of 2013. Specifically, the bill:
▪ Increases the pensionable compensation cap for all PEPRA employees; ▪ Reduces the retirement age for public safety (fire and police) from 57 to 55; ▪ Adds a 4th safety tier that is 3% @ 55, subject to bargaining; ▪ Allows local agencies to adjust their local formula.
o Status: Governor’s Desk
• AB 1821 (Pacheco) California Public Records Act: agency response time. o This bill extends the deadlines for public agencies to provide an initial response to a California Public Records Act request by converting the current ”calendar day” deadlines to a ”business day” standard.
o Status: Governor’s Desk
• SB 1159 (Cabaldon) Artificial intelligence: transparency and governance. o This bill clarifies that for the California Public Records Act, the Ralph M. Brown Act, and the California Environmental Quality Act, that the terms “person,” “interested person,” “participant,” and “member of the public ” do not include artificial intelligence systems, autonomous agents, robots, or other nonhuman entities, whether physical or digital.
o Status: Governor’s Desk
• AB 2656 (Petrie-Norris) Public employees: notice: artificial intelligence performing service within scope of work.
o This bill requires state and local public employers to provide a recognized employee organization no less than 45 days’ written notice before taking an action to develop, purchase, or require the use of any generative artificial intelligence to perform a Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 15 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 5 service that is within the scope of work of the job classification represented by the recognized employee organization.
o Status: Governor’s Desk
• SB 1187 (Durazo) Open meetings.
o This bill repeals the language access provisions in SB 707 (Durazo, 2025). o Status: Governor’s Desk
Elections
• SB 1164 (Cervantes) Elections.
o This bill prohibits a political subdivision or state agency from implementing, imposing, or enforcing any election policy or practice that results, or is likely to result, in voter suppression. A violation is established when an election policy or practice disproportionately makes it harder for protected classes to vote or participate politically, unless the government can show the policy is necessary and that a less discriminatory alternative is not reasonably available. o Status: Governor’s Desk
• SB 1360 (Cervantes) Elections: translation of election materials. o This bill would require the Secretary of State, on or before December 15, 2031, and on or before December 15 in every year ending in 1 or 7 thereafter, to identify the counties where at least 10,000 voting age citizens, or 5% of voting age citizens, are limited English proficient and either members of a single language minority group or speak a shared language. The bill would require the elections official in an identified political subdivision to provide translated election materials in any language that meets those criteria.
o Status: Governor’s Desk
Miscellaneous
• SB 922 (Laird) Vehicles: local agency charges: use of streets or highways. o This bill would expressly authorize an existing fee, charge, or surcharge imposed by or for a local agency upon the provider of, or ratepayer for, public services in order to recover the costs associated with the use of the agency’s streets, roads, or highways in the provision of those public services.
o Status: Chaptered
• SB 1117 (Cervantes) Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units. o This bill requires impact fees for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) to be calculated only on the portion of the unit exceeding 750 square feet, rather than on its total square footage, for up to two ADUs on a single lot.
o Status: Governor’s Desk
ACTIVE POSITIONED BILLS
• AB 2179 (Patel) Workplace violence: restraining orders. o Location: Assembly Enrollment
o Position: Sponsor
• AB 2453 (Rodriguez, Michelle) Vehicles: off-highway motor vehicles. o Location: Assembly Enrolled
o Position: Sponsor
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 16 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 6 • AB 35 (Alvarez) Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, Drought Preparedness, and Clean Air Bond Act of 2024: Administrative Procedure Act: exemption: program guidelines and selection criteria.
o Location: Assembly Chaptered
o Position: Support
• AB 956 (Quirk-Silva) Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units. o Location: Assembly Enrollment
o Position: Oppose
• AB 1294 (Haney) Real property tax: welfare exemption: moderate-income housing. o Location: Assembly Enrollment
o Position: Watch
• AB 1383 (McKinnor) Public employees’ retirement benefits. o Location: Assembly Enrollment
o Position: Watch
• AB 1569 (Davies) Pupil safety: electric bicycle: safety and training program. o Location: Assembly Chaptered
o Position: Support
• AB 1614 (Dixon) Vehicles: bicycles.
o Location: Assembly Chaptered
o Position: Support
• AB 1621 (Wilson) Planning and Zoning Law: postentitlement phase permits: Housing Accountability Act.
o Location: Assembly Enrolled
o Position: Oppose
• AB 1751 (Quirk-Silva) Missing Middle Townhome Ownership Act. o Location: Assembly Enrollment
o Position: Oppose
• AB 1821 (Pacheco) California Public Records Act: agency response time. o Location: Assembly Enrolled
o Position: Support
• AB 2296 (Papan) Planning and zoning: housing element: regional housing needs allocation. o Location: Assembly Enrollment
o Position: Support
• AB 2346 (Wilson) Vehicles: electric bicycles and speed limits. o Location: Assembly Enrolled
o Position: Support
• AB 2433 (Alvarez) Housing development: density bonus. o Location: Assembly Enrollment
o Position: Oppose Unless Amended
• SB 329 (Blakespear) Alcohol and drug recovery: licensed treatment facilities and certified programs: investigations.
o Location: Senate Enrollment
o Position: Support
• SB 490 (Umberg) Alcohol and drug programs.
o Location: Senate Enrollment
o Position: Support
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 17 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 7 • SB 722 (Wahab) Transit-oriented housing development: excluded parcels and sites. o Location: Senate Chaptered
o Position: Support
• SB 741 (Blakespear) Low Carbon Transit Operations Program. o Location: Senate Enrollment
o Position: Support
• SB 758 (Umberg) Public health: nitrous oxide.
o Location: Senate Enrollment
o Position: Support
• SB 936 (Blakespear) Nitrous oxide: sales.
o Location: Senate Enrollment
o Position: Support
• SB 1014 (Grayson) Development projects: preliminary estimate of required improvements:
onsite and offsite improvements.
o Location: Senate Enrolled
o Position: Oppose
• SB 1036 (Grayson) Mitigation Fee Act.
o Location: Senate Chaptered
o Position: Watch
• SB 1085 (Durazo) Water supply planning: housing developments. o Location: Senate Enrollment
o Position: Watch
• SB 1159 (Cabaldon) Artificial intelligence: transparency and governance. o Location: Senate Enrolled
o Position: Support
• SB 1167 (Blakespear) Vehicles: electric bicycles.
o Location: Senate Enrollment
o Position: Support
• SJR 12 (Laird) Proposed 2026–2031 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program: opposition.
o Location: Senate Chaptered
o Position: Support
LOOKING FORWARD
• September 30: Last day for the Governor to sign or veto bills
GRANT WRITING
CPPG continues to monitor new regional, state, and federal grant opportunities on behalf of the City of Carlsbad. The August 2026 Municipal Funding Outlook was sent out on August 28 th. On August 19th, Director of Grant Services Jake Whitaker, Senior Grant Writing Associate Maira Durazo, Grants Analyst Remi Beck, and Grant Services Assistant Kylie Sheridan met with Staff for the Monthly Grants Meeting.
Grant applications in progress include the Coastal Conservancy Grant Program.
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 18 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 8 Pending applications include:
• Safe Streets and Roads for All submitted on May 26, 2026 for $1,984,000. Funding will be used to update the City’s Local Roadway Safety Plan.
• Wildfire Prevention Grant submitted on July 8, 2026 for $950,000. Funding will be used to reduce hazardous fuel loads across city-owned urban forests, natural open space preserves, and areas surrounding critical public facilities
Additionally, CPPG sent grant alerts on the following upcoming funding opportunities: Safer Outcomes: Enhancing Crisis Response Training for Law Enforcement Program, Fuels Management and Community Fire Assistance Program, Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership Program, Rubberized Pavement Grant Program, Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant, Land and Water Conservation Fund, Public Safety and Mental Health Initiative, Crime Gun Intelligence Center Integration Initiative, Body -Worn Camera Policy and Implementation Program, Byrne Justice Assistance Grant – Local Formula, and Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program.
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 19 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 1 City of Carlsbad Priority Legislation as of September 3, 2026 Artificial Intelligence
SB 1159 (Cabaldon) Artificial intelligence: transparency and governance. (Enrolled 08/28/2026)
The California Constitution provides that people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people’s business. Various provisions of existing law, including the California Public Records Act, the Legislative Open Records Act, the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, and the Ralph M. Brown Act, provide, with some exceptions, for public access to government records and meetings of government bodies. Among those acts, the California Public Records Act defines “person” to include any natural person, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, firm, or association. This bill would specify that, for purposes of the California Public Records Act, the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, the Ralph M. Brown Act, the Legislative Open Records Act, the Administrative Procedure Act, the California Coastal Act of 1976, and CEQA, “person,” “interested person,” “participant,” “member of the public,” as applicable, and any other similar terms under each act referring to those who may engage with governmental agencies, do not include artificial intelligence, as defined, systems, autonomous agents, or robots, whether physical or digital. The bill would authorize governmental agencies to use a disclosure verification tool to determine if artificial intelligence is present. The bill would make findings and declarations related to these provisions. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/24/2026 text)
Location: 08/28/2026 - Senate Enrolled
Position: Support
Notes1:
5/13/26: KB marked as support per client request. 5/15/26: KB shared draft letter with the client. 5/29/26: KB submitted letter to portal and delegation. 6/10/26: II resubmitted the support letter to Asm. committees through the legislative portal. 6/24/26: II testified in support of the Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee. 08/30/26: Emailed RFS letter to Governor's Leg Unit.
Exhibit 3
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 20 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 2 Children, Youth and Recreation
AB 387 (Alanis) Nevaeh Youth Sports Safety Act. (Enrollment 08/30/2026) Existing law, the Nevaeh Youth Sports Safety Act, requires a youth sports organization to ensure, by January 1, 2028, that its athletes have access to an automated external defibrillator (AED) during any official practice or match. Existing law requires a youth sports organization, commencing January 1, 2028, to ensure that its AED is maintained and tested according to specified operation and maintenance guidelines. This bill would require, commencing January 1, 2028, a public or private local facility with a permanent sports infrastructure, as defined, to ensure that the youth sports organization has access to an AED procured and maintained by the facility during an official practice or match permitted by the facility, except as specified with respect to local educational agencies. The bill would require the youth sports organization, commencing January 1, 2028, to ensure there is access to an operational AED if an AED is not available at a public or private local facility where an official practice or match is taking place. The bill would additionally require a public or private local facility, commencing January 1, 2028, to ensure that its AED is maintained and tested according to specified operation and maintenance guidelines. The bill would require a public or private local facility to work in collaboration with the youth sports organization to ensure that any AED that is installed be accessible to youth sports organizations at the time of official practices or matches permitted by the facility. The bill would require a public or private local facility that has installed an AED to work with the youth sports organization to identify means to share the financial costs associated with ensuring the AED is maintained and accessible at the facility, or to identify means to share the financial costs associated with installing an AED at the facility. (Based on 08/21/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 2007 (Bauer-Kahan) Youth programs: identifying information of youth. (Enrolled 09/01/2026)
Existing law makes a person who knowingly uses another’s name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness, in any manner, on or in products, merchandise, or goods, or for purposes of advertising or selling, or soliciting purchases of, products, merchandise, goods, or services, without that person’s prior consent, or, in the case of a minor, the prior consent of the person’s parent or legal guardian, liable for damages, as specified, among other remedies, as prescribed. Existing law generally regulates organizations and businesses that provide athletic, instructional, or other services to minors by imposing disclosure, training, background check, and child abuse prevention requirements on those entities and their personnel. This bill would prohibit an entity or organization that operates a specified nonschool youth program from using certain identifying information of a youth, including their picture, video, audio recording, likeness, and attributed statements, for communications, marketing, or other purpose that exposes that information to the public unless the entity or organization obtains the parent or guardian’s express written consent on a specified notice. The bill would prohibit the entity or organization from making a youth’s enrollment or participation in the program contingent upon a parent or guardian consenting to the program’s use of the youth’s information for any communications, marketing, or other purpose that exposes that information to the public. The bill would authorize a parent or guardian to revoke consent, as specified. This bill would authorize a parent or guardian to bring a civil action against an entity or organization for noncompliance with these provisions and would provide for specified remedies, Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 21 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 3 including, among others, specified civil penalties per youth who has had the youth’s information disclosed and injunctive or declaratory relief. (Based on 09/01/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Coastal
AB 1448 (Hart) Coastal resources: California Coastal Sanctuary: tidelands and submerged lands: oil and gas development. (Enrolled 09/01/2026)
Existing law creates the California Coastal Sanctuary and provides that it includes all state waters subject to tidal influence, except as provided. Existing law authorizes the State Lands Commission to enter into any lease for the extraction of oil or gas from state-owned tidelands and submerged lands in the California Coastal Sanctuary if the commission determines both that oil and gas deposits in the California Coastal Sanctuary are being drained by means of producing wells upon adjacent federal lands and that the lease is in the best interest of the state. This bill would prohibit the commission from entering into leases for the extraction of oil or gas, as described above, in areas designated as California marine protected areas or national marine sanctuaries, as provided.
This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 09/01/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Elections, Political Reform and Redistricting
SB 1164 (Cervantes) Elections. (Enrolled 08/30/2026)
The California Voting Rights Act of 2001 (CVRA) prohibits a political subdivision from imposing or applying an at-large method of election for members of the political subdivision’s governing body in a manner that impairs the ability of a protected class to elect candidates of its choice or its ability to influence the outcome of an election, as specified. Existing law requires courts to implement appropriate remedies, including the imposition of district-based elections, for violations of the CVRA. This bill would revise the CVRA. The bill would prohibit a political subdivision or state agency from implementing, imposing, or enforcing any election policy or practice, as defined, that results in, or is likely to result in, voter suppression. An election policy or practice would result in voter suppression if it (1) causes a material disparity in voter participation, access to voting opportunities, or the opportunity or ability to participate in the political process for members of a protected class, which is defined as any race, color, or language-minority group; or (2) based on the totality of circumstances, causes an impairment of the equal opportunity or ability of members of a protected class to participate in the political process. An election policy or practice would not violate the prohibition on voter suppression if the political subdivision or state agency demonstrates, by clear and convincing evidence, that the election policy or practice is necessary to significantly further a compelling and particularized governmental interest and there is no reasonable alternative that comparably furthers the governmental interest and results in a smaller disparity between members of a protected class and other members of the electorate. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/30/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Senate Enrollment
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 22 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 4 Emergency Response and Disaster Preparedness
AB 442 (Hadwick) Z’berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973: working forest management plans: nonindustrial timber management plans. (Enrolled 08/24/2026) Under the Z’berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973, the Legislature finds and declares the policy of the state to encourage prudent and responsible forest management of nonindustrial timberlands by approving working forest management plans in advance. This bill would increase the maximum acreage for nonindustrial tree farmers and nonindustrial management plans to 4,000 acres and for working forest landowners and working forest management plans to 15,000 acres.
This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/19/2026 text)
Location: 08/24/2026 - Assembly Enrolled
AB 2341 (Fong) Local government: emergency response services: use of languages other than English. (Chaptered 08/31/2026)
Existing law requires, in the event of an emergency within the jurisdiction of a local agency that provides emergency response services and that serves a population within which 5% or more of the people speak English less than “very well,” according to American Community Survey data, and jointly speak a language other than English, that the local agency provide information related to the emergency in English and in all languages spoken jointly by the 5% or more of the population that speaks English less than “very well,” as specified. This bill would revise these provisions to instead require the local agency to provide information related to an emergency within a local agency’s jurisdiction in English and translated in each language spoken by 5% or more of the population that speaks English less than “very well.” The bill, to determine whether a language meets the criteria for translation, would require a local agency to calculate the total population of those within its jurisdiction that speaks English less than “very well,” and, for each language included in the American Community Survey data, or data from an equally reliable source, determine whether speakers of any language who speak English less than “very well” comprise at least 5% of the total population of that jurisdiction that speaks English less than “very well.” The bill would make organizational and clarifying changes to the above-described provisions, as specified. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. (Based on 08/31/2026 text)
Location: 08/31/2026 - Assembly Chaptered
SB 877 (Pérez) Residential property insurance: loss estimate transparency. (Enrollment 08/31/2026)
Existing law generally regulates classes of insurance, including residential property insurance.
Existing law prohibits a policy of residential property insurance from being issued or renewed by an insurer unless the named insured is provided a copy of specified information, including the California Residential Insurance Disclosure. Under existing law, the California Standard Form Fire Insurance Policy requires an insured to notify every claimant that they can request copies of claim- related documents, as defined to include all valuation, measurement, and loss adjustment calculations of the amount of loss, covered damage, and cost of repairs, that the insurer is required to provide within 15 calendar days of the request. Under existing law, it is a misdemeanor to issue or countersign a fire policy that varies from the standard form fire insurance policy. This bill would modify the definition of claim-related documents for purposes of the above-described Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 23 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 5 provisions to include all valuation, measurement, and loss adjustment calculations, whether preliminary or final, that relate to the amount of loss, covered damage, and cost of repairs.
Because the bill would make changes to the standard form for fire insurance, the bill would expand the scope of an existing crime and impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/21/2026 text)
Location: 08/31/2026 - Senate Enrollment
SB 904 (Seyarto) Recovery from a state of emergency. (Enrolled 08/30/2026) Existing law, the California Emergency Services Act, authorizes the Governor to proclaim a state of emergency when specified conditions of disaster or extreme peril to the safety of persons and property exist, and authorizes the Governor to exercise certain powers in response to that emergency, including, but not limited to, suspending specified statutes, ordinances, orders, regulations, or rules. This bill would impose specific duties on the Department of Housing and Community Development if the Office of Emergency Services makes a written determination, within 10 days after the date that the Governor declared a state of emergency relating to a wildfire, that the wildfire caused substantial structural damage requiring significant rebuilding efforts, as defined. The bill would require the department, under this condition, to consult with other specified state entities and local governments to identify state permitting requirements and local procedures that could be suspended or revised to support recovery and rebuilding efforts as a result of the wildfire, as specified. The bill would require the department to prepare and submit initial and periodic reports to the Governor and Legislature with the information and recommendations. This bill, on or before July 1, 2028, would require the Department of Housing and Community Development, in consultation with other specified state entities, to convene a workgroup to review and provide a report to the Governor and the Legislature with recommendations regarding any provision of the California Building Standards Code that should be suspended for specified types of projects to facilitate rapid, safe, disaster-resilient, and cost-effective rebuilding and recovery guidance for any future state of emergency. The bill would require the workgroup to review and update the report to the Governor and Legislature after the release of every update to the California Building Standards Code. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/27/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Senate Enrolled
Energy and Utilities
AB 1761 (Rogers) Electricity: calculation methodology: nonbypassable charges: data disclosure. (Enrolled 08/30/2026)
Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable.
This bill would require the commission to ensure that all data serving as a basis for any decision or ruling issued by the commission, or in any proposal or analysis provided by commission staff, for the determination or application of a calculation methodology for any nonbypassable charge imposed on customers of a load-serving entity to recover costs associated with contracts, electrical corporation-owned generation, or any other resource or value included in that charge Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 24 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 6 and any other charge derived from those costs, is made available to load-serving entities and ratepayer advocates on behalf of customers. The bill would require the commission to require an electrical corporation, member association, load-serving entity, or other party, in submitting a proposal or analysis for the determination or application of a calculation methodology for any nonbypasssable charge imposed on customers of a load-serving entity to recover costs associated with contracts, electrical corporation-owned generation, or any other resource or value included in that charge and any other charge derived from those costs, to make all data serving as a basis for that proposal or analysis available to load-serving entities and ratepayer advocates on behalf of customers. The bill would require that the data exclude any information that can reasonably be used to identify an individual, family, household, residence, or nonresidential customer. The bill would require that the data meet specified requirements, including that it is made available through a public disclosure, except for market-sensitive data, as provided. This bill contains other existing laws. (Based on 08/30/2026 text)
Location: 08/26/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 1820 (Schiavo) Electric vehicle charging stations: permit fees. (Enrolled 08/28/2026) Existing law requires a city, county, or city and county to administratively approve an application to install an electric vehicle charging station through the issuance of a building permit or similar nondiscretionary permit, and requires every local government to adopt an ordinance that creates an expedited, streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations, as provided.
Existing law defines “electric vehicle charging station” to mean any level of electric vehicle supply equipment station that is designed and built in compliance with specified provisions, and delivers electricity from a source outside an electric vehicle into a plug-in electric vehicle. Existing law requires fees charged by a local agency for specified purposes, including permits, to not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged, unless a question regarding the amount of the fee charged in excess of this cost is submitted to, and approved by, 2/3 of the electors. Existing law, until January 1, 2034, prohibits a city, county, city or county, or charter city from charging a permit fee for a solar energy system that exceeds the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged, which cannot exceed $450 plus $15 per kilowatt for each kilowatt above 15kW for residential solar energy systems, and $1,000 plus $7 per kilowatt for each kilowatt between 51kW and 250kW, plus $5 for every kilowatt above 250kW, for commercial solar energy systems, unless the city, county, city and county, or charter city provides substantial evidence of the reasonable cost to issue the permit as part of a written finding and an adopted resolution or ordinance, as provided. This bill, until January 1, 2036, would prohibit a city, county, city or county, or charter city from charging a permit fee for an electric vehicle charging station that exceeds the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged, which cannot exceed $500 plus $5 per kilowatt for each kilowatt between 51kW and 250kW, plus $2 for every kilowatt above 250kW, for a level 2 electric vehicle charging station installed at a new or existing multifamily housing development, unless the city, county, city and county, or charter city provides substantial evidence of the reasonable cost to issue the permit as part of a written finding and an adopted resolution or ordinance, as provided.
The bill would make its provisions operative on July 1, 2027, but for every city, county, city and county, or charter city with a population of fewer than 200,000 residents, the provisions would apply beginning on January 1, 2028. By requiring local agencies to perform additional duties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/26/2026 text)
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 25 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 7
Location: 08/28/2026 - Assembly Enrolled
AB 2369 (Rogers) Electricity: energy storage: energy-only resources. (Enrolled 09/02/2026) Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing law requires the PUC to adopt a process for each load-serving entity to file an integrated resource plan, and a schedule for periodic updates to the plan, as provided. Existing law requires the PUC, in consultation with the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) and the Independent System Operator (ISO), to determine if there is a need for the procurement of eligible energy resources based on a review of the integrated resource plans. This bill would require the PUC, when requiring procurement of resources under an integrated resource plan, to account for the ability of energy-only resources to achieve required clean energy deployment rates, to charge storage resources during off-peak periods, and to increase resource diversity, and would require the PUC to enable energy-only resources to satisfy procurement requirements to the maximum extent feasible This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 09/02/2026 text)
Location: 08/28/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
SB 222 (Wiener) Residential heat pump water heater or heat pump HVAC systems. (Enrolled 08/30/2026)
Existing law establishes the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission and prescribes the authorities, duties, and responsibilities of the commission pertaining to energy matters. Existing law requires the commission, on or before January 1, 2019, in consultation with the Contractors State License Board, local building officials, and other stakeholders, to approve a plan that promotes compliance with specified regulations relating to building energy efficiency standards in the installation of central air-conditioning and heat pumps, as specified. Existing law authorizes the commission to adopt regulations to increase compliance with permitting and inspection requirements for central air-conditioning and heat pumps, and associated sales and installations, consistent with the above-described plan. This bill would establish various requirements and authorizations for the installation of a residential heat pump water heater or heat pump HVAC system, as defined, by, among other things, requiring a city, county, or city and county, beginning July 1, 2027, to adopt and offer asynchronous inspections for installations that do not require a licensed contractor and building inspector to be simultaneously present during the inspection. The bill would additionally require a city, county, or city and county, except as specified, to post specific information online, and on or before July 1, 2028, to implement an online automated permitting process for the installation of a residential heat pump water heater or heat pump HVAC system that issues permits in real time to a licensed contractor that meets certain criteria. The bill would require the criteria to include, among others, that the licensed contractor certify under penalty of perjury that they have performed a load calculation to properly size the new equipment, as specified. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state- mandated local program. By imposing these various new duties on the described local entities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/27/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Senate Enrolled
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 26 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 8 SB 886 (Padilla) California Technology Innovation and Ratepayer Protection Act. (Enrollment 08/31/2026)
Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable.
This bill, the California Technology Innovation and Ratepayer Protection Act, would require the commission, on or before January 1, 2028, to establish new tariffs or update existing electric rules for the interconnection of participating customer facilities and the provision of retail electric service, transmission, distribution, and generation services to participating customers, as specified. The bill would require the commission, as part of establishing and updating electric rules, to, at a minimum, evaluate the risks and benefits of the tariffs to nonparticipating customers, ensure that the tariffs prevent the creation of stranded costs for, or cost shifts to, nonparticipating customers, and, for unbundled customers, ensure that charges generally included in the generation component of the unbundled customer’s consolidated bill are assessed as a separate line item on their bill. The bill would require, as part of a new or existing proceeding, the commission to establish a tariff for the interconnection of a participating customer seeking to receive retail electric service at the transmission level that meets certain requirements, as specified. The bill would authorize a participating customer to participate in a new demand response program authorized by the commission, as specified. The bill would authorize an electrical corporation to submit an exceptional case filing to approve a contract between the electrical corporation and a data center seeking interconnection at the transmission level for those facilities that seek to obtain retail electric service after January 1, 2027, but before the commission has approved the tariff, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/28/2026 text)
Location: 09/01/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Environment and Climate
AB 35 (Alvarez) Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, Drought Preparedness, and Clean Air Bond Act of 2024: Administrative Procedure Act: exemption: program guidelines and selection criteria. (Chaptered 07/16/2026)
Existing law, the Administrative Procedure Act, sets forth the requirements for the adoption, publication, review, and implementation of regulations by state agencies. The Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, Drought Preparedness, and Clean Air Bond Act of 2024 (act), approved by the voters as Proposition 4 at the November 5, 2024, statewide general election, authorized the issuance of bonds in the amount of $10,000,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to finance projects for safe drinking water, drought, flood, and water resilience, wildfire and forest resilience, coastal resilience, extreme heat mitigation, biodiversity and nature-based climate solutions, climate-smart, sustainable, and resilient farms, ranches, and working lands, park creation and outdoor access, and clean air programs. Existing law authorizes certain regulations needed to effectuate or implement programs of the act to be adopted as emergency regulations in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act, as provided. Existing law requires the emergency regulations to be filed with the Office of Administrative Law and requires the emergency regulations to remain in effect until repealed or amended by the adopting state agency.
This bill, notwithstanding the above, would exempt the adoption of regulations needed to Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 27 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 9 effectuate or implement programs of the act from the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, as provided. The bill would require a state entity that receives funding to administer a competitive grant program established using the Administrative Procedure Act exemption to do certain things, including, among other things, to develop draft project solicitation and evaluation guidelines, to transmit copies of those guidelines to the fiscal committees and to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature, to hold a noticed public meeting on those guidelines, and to submit those guidelines to the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency, except as provided. The bill would require the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to post an electronic form of the guidelines submitted by a state entity and the subsequent verifications on the Natural Resources Agency’s internet website. The bill would authorize the use of certain previously developed program guidelines and selection criteria for these purposes, as provided. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 07/16/2026 text)
Location: 07/16/2026 - Assembly Chaptered
Position: Support
Notes1:
1/14/26: DA tagged as support. 1/15/26: SG sent draft support letter to the City for review. 1/26/26:
EN received final Word draft of letter, finalized, and sent back to the City for their records. 1/26/26:
DA submitted letter to portal and delegation. 5/7/26: KB submitted letter to portal. 6/9/26: KR testified in support in Senate Natural Resources. 6/18/26: KB submitted letter to portal.
AB 2253 (Boerner) Solid waste: products: recycled content claims. (Enrollment 08/30/2026) Existing law requires a manufacturer or supplier making an environmental marketing claim relating to the recycled content of a plastic food container product to maintain specified information and documentation in written form in its records in support of that claim and to, upon request, furnish that maintained information to any member of the public, as specified. Existing law requires the maintained information to include that the recycled content for materials has been diverted from the solid waste stream either during the manufacturing process (preconsumer) or after consumer use (postconsumer) and that the recycled content claim conforms to the uniform standards for recycled content contained in the Federal Trade Commission Guides for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims. Existing law provides for the imposition of a civil penalty by a city, county, or the state for a violation of these provisions. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2030, expand the application of those provisions from plastic food container products to all products making recycled content claims. The bill would revise the reference to the Federal Trade Commission Guides for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims to specifically refer to those guides as they read on January 1, 2026. The bill would additionally require documentation in written form that the recycled content material claimed does not exceed the amount of third-party certified recycled content introduced into the manufacturer’s or supplier’s overall supply stream for the material used in that product line. The bill would require the recycled content claim to be based on the actual recycled content used in the production of the material used in the product line using specified methods. The bill would require a manufacturer or supplier making an environmental marketing claim relating to the recycled content of a product other than a plastic food container product to furnish, upon request, the aforementioned maintained information to the Attorney General, as specified. The bill would also keep any confidential, proprietary, or trade secret information provided or obtained regarding a product, other than a plastic food container product, Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 28 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 10 confidential, as provided. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/21/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
SB 887 (Padilla) California Environmental Quality Act: environmental leadership development projects: data centers: geothermal powerplant projects. (Enrollment 08/31/2026) (1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. This bill would define "data center" for the purposes of CEQA and prohibit the application of categorical exemption to a project for the development and operation of a data center, as specified. By increasing the duties of a lead agency in relation to the environmental review of a data center project, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/27/2026 text)
Location: 09/01/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
SJR 12 (Laird) Proposed 2026–2031 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program: opposition. (Chaptered 08/11/2026)
This measure would request that the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management hold public hearings in California on the proposed 2026–2031 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program, preparean environmental impact statement to accompany the program, and provide the public the opportunity to comment on a draft programmatic environmental impact statement for potential offshore oil and gas leasing in California. The measure would strongly and unequivocally oppose any new offshore drilling and declare unequivocal support for the current federal prohibition on new oil or gas drilling in federal waters offshore of the Pacific coast. (Based on 08/11/2026 text)
Location: 08/11/2026 - Senate Chaptered
Position: Support
Notes1:
5/12/26: KB added support positioning after City's leg committee. 5/15/26: KB shared draft letter with the client. 5/29/26: KB submitted letter to portal and delegation. 6/8/26: CS testified in support in Asm. Natural Resources.
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 29 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 11 Governmental Operations
AB 1383 (McKinnor) Public employees’ retirement benefits. (Enrollment 08/30/2026) The Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL) establishes the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) to provide a defined benefit to members of the system based on final compensation, credited service, and age at retirement, subject to certain variations. Existing law creates the Public Employees’ Retirement Fund, which is continuously appropriated for purposes of PERS, including depositing employer and employee contributions. Under the California Constitution, assets of a public pension or retirement system are trust funds. The California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) establishes a variety of requirements and restrictions on public employers offering defined benefit pension plans. In this regard, PEPRA restricts the amount of compensation that may be applied for purposes of calculating a defined pension benefit for a new member, as defined, by restricting it to specified percentages of the contribution and benefit base under a specified federal law with respect to old age, survivors, and disability insurance benefits. Existing law, the Teachers’ Retirement Law, establishes the State Teachers’ Retirement System (STRS) and creates the Defined Benefit Program of the State Teachers’ Retirement Plan, which provides a defined benefit to members of the program, based on final compensation, creditable service, and age at retirement, subject to certain variations. This bill, for service performed on and after January 1, 2027, would prohibit the pensionable compensation for calendar year 2027 used to calculate the defined benefit paid to a new member of a retirement system subject to PEPRA who retires from the system from exceeding specified percentages of the contribution and benefit base under the specified federal law with respect to old age, survivors, and disability insurance benefits. The bill would make related, conforming changes to these provisions on pensionable compensation. The bill also would require a new member of STRS to be subject to specified limits of the Teachers’ Retirement Law. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/27/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Position: Watch
AB 1439 (Garcia) Public retirement systems: development projects: labor standards. (Enrolled 09/01/2026)
The California Constitution grants the retirement board of a public employee retirement system plenary authority and fiduciary responsibility for investment of moneys and administration of the retirement fund and system. These provisions qualify this grant of powers by reserving to the Legislature the authority to prohibit investments if it is in the public interest and the prohibition satisfies standards of fiduciary care and loyalty required of a retirement board. Existing law prohibits the boards of the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) and the State Teachers’ Retirement System (STRS) from making certain new investments or renewing existing investments of public employee retirement funds, including in a thermal coal company, as defined. Existing law provides that a board is not required to take any action regarding those investments unless the board determines in good faith that the action is consistent with the board’s fiduciary responsibilities established in the California Constitution. This bill would request the University of California, Berkeley, Labor Center to conduct an independent study to analyze the extent of labor standards protections in California real estate and infrastructure development projects funded through the real asset portfolios of PERS and STRS. The bill would request that the study and a Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 30 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 12 report of its findings be completed and provided to the Legislature and the Department of Finance by January 1, 2028, as specified. (Based on 09/01/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 1577 (Bauer-Kahan) Data centers: reporting. (Enrolled 09/01/2026) Existing law establishes the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission and vests the commission with various responsibilities with respect to developing and implementing the state’s energy policies. Existing law requires the commission to biennially adopt an integrated energy policy report, as specified, and to make the reports accessible to state, local, and federal entities and to the general public. This bill would require the commission to establish a process for the owner or operator of a data center, as defined, to submit specified information to the commission, including, among other information, the data center’s location and size, the data center’s power usage effectiveness, as defined, and the quantity of fuel consumed by onsite generators or other fuel-based energy systems, as specified. The bill would require the owner or operator of a data center to submit the required information in the manner and timeframe specified by the commission. The bill would require the commission, beginning with the 2029 integrated energy policy report, and in subsequent biennial reports thereafter as determined by the commission, to include an assessment of electrical load trends for data centers, as provided. The bill would require the commission to annually publish the information submitted in an anonymized and aggregated format on its internet website. The bill would require the commission to establish a process for the owner or operator of a data center to identify information that the owner or operator claims is exempted or prohibited from disclosure pursuant to federal or state law, as provided. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 09/01/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 1578 (Jackson) State agency officials: training on responding to hate: local agency officials:
anti-hate speech training. (Enrollment 08/30/2026)
The California Fair Employment and Housing Act makes specified employment practices unlawful, including the harassment of an employee directly by the employer or indirectly by agents of the employer with the employer’s knowledge. Under existing law, the Civil Rights Department administers these provisions. Existing law requires a specified employer with 5 or more employees to, by January 1, 2021, provide at least 2 hours of classroom or other effective interactive training and education regarding sexual harassment to all supervisory employees and at least one hour of classroom or other effective interactive training and education regarding sexual harassment to all nonsupervisory employees in California and, after that date, once every 2 years. Existing law requires an employer to include prevention of abusive conduct as a component of that training and education. This bill would require, beginning on January 1, 2028, if a state agency provides any type of compensation, salary, or stipend to a state agency official of that agency, that all state agency officials of that agency receive training on responding to hate, as prescribed. The bill would define “state agency official” to mean a state elected official for that purpose. The bill would require at least one hour of training and education for a state agency official within the first 6 months of taking office or commencing employment, and every 2 years thereafter. The bill would authorize a state agency or an association of state agencies to offer one or more training courses, or sets of self- study materials with tests, to meet these requirements. The bill would authorize a state agency to develop its own training that meets the requirements or direct elected officials to complete a Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 31 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 13 training developed by the department. The bill would require the department to develop or obtain an online training course on responding to hate and make the course available on its internet website. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/26/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 1680 (Calderon) California FAIR Plan Association. (Enrollment 08/31/2026) The California FAIR Plan Association is a joint reinsurance association in which all insurers licensed to write basic property insurance participate to administer a program for the equitable apportionment of basic property insurance for persons who are unable to obtain that coverage through normal channels. Existing law requires the Insurance Commissioner to approve the association’s plan of operation and authorizes the commissioner to examine the association’s books, records, files, papers, and documents that relate to its operation. Existing law authorizes the commissioner to impose civil penalties for various violations of the Insurance Code. This bill would require the association to take corrective actions, as specified by the commissioner or their designee, to rectify violations of applicable statutes, regulations, accounting principles, the plan of operation, or other legally binding applicable rules identified in a report of examination or other operational report. The bill would subject the association to a penalty of not more than $20,000 for failing to take the specified corrective action within a timeframe agreed upon by the commissioner or their designee. The bill would set other civil penalty amounts for violations of provisions relative to the association as not to exceed $10,000 for each act in violation or not to exceed $20,000 if the act was willful, and would require the commissioner to impose those penalties, as specified. The bill would also authorize the commissioner to require the association to both adjust the policy limits available under programs underwritten by the association and make additional coverage offerings available for fair rental value coverage under the association’s renters’ property insurance program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 10095 of the Insurance Code proposed by AB 69 to be operative only if this bill and AB 69 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (Based on 08/19/2026 text)
Location: 08/31/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 1821 (Pacheco) California Public Records Act: agency response time. (Enrolled 08/31/2026) Existing law, the California Public Records Act, requires each state or local agency, upon a request for a copy of records that reasonably describes an identifiable record or records, to make the records promptly available to any person upon payment of fees covering direct costs of duplication, or a statutory fee if applicable, except with respect to public records exempt from disclosure by express provisions of law. Existing law requires each agency, within 10 days of a request for a copy of records, to determine whether the request seeks copies of disclosable public records in possession of the agency and to promptly notify the person of the determination and the reasons therefor. Existing law authorizes that time limit to be extended by no more than 14 days under unusual circumstances, as defined. This bill would instead require each agency to determine whether the request seeks copies of disclosable public records in possession of the agency and to promptly notify the person as described above within 10 business days of a request for a copy of records. The bill would instead authorize the time period for each agency to respond to be extended by no more than 14 business days. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/27/2026 text)
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 32 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 14
Location: 08/31/2026 - Assembly Enrolled
Position: Support
Notes1:
4/14: City approved stance on bill. 4/16: SG and KB confirmed stance in weekly meeting. 4/17: KB sent City draft of the letter. 4/22/26: KB testified on behalf of the City at Asm Appropriations. 4/28/26: KB submitted letter to delegation and portal (Assembly Judiciary Committee and Assembly Appropriations Committee). 6/17/26: KB submitted letter to portal. 6/30/26: EN provided me too support testimony in Senate Judiciary.
AB 1883 (Bryan) Workplace surveillance tools. (Enrollment 08/30/2026) Existing law establishes the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement within the Department of Industrial Relations. Existing law authorizes the division, which is headed by the Labor Commissioner, to enforce the Labor Code and all labor laws of the state, the enforcement of which is not specifically vested in any other officer, board, or commission. This bill would, with certain exceptions, prohibit an employer from using a workplace surveillance tool that uses artificial intelligence to, among other things, collect neural data or recognize an individual’s emotional state. The bill would define an employer to include a governmental entity, including, among other entities, charter cities and the University of California. This bill would authorize the Labor Commissioner or a public prosecutor to enforce the bill’s provisions. The bill would subject an employer who violates the bill’s provisions to a civil penalty of up to $500 for each violation. The bill would define various terms for purposes of its provisions. This bill would exempt from its provisions an employer’s use of a workplace surveillance tool in specified operations where the use of a workplace surveillance tool is reasonable necessary to comply with a federal statute, federal regulation, or binding federal contract relating to the development of aircraft for use in the national airspace or the development of products or services for national security, military, space, or defense purposes. This bill contains other related provisions. (Based on 08/21/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 1961 (Ahrens) Civil actions: protective orders: workplace violence. (Enrolled 08/30/2026) Existing law authorizes an employer or collective bargaining representative of an employee who has suffered harassment, unlawful violence, or a credible threat of violence from any individual, to seek a workplace violence restraining order on behalf of the employee and, at the discretion of the court, any number of other employees at the workplace or at other workplaces of the employer.
Existing law authorizes one or more representative parties to bring suit for the benefit of a class of parties if the question is one of a common or general interest, of many persons, or when the parties are numerous, and it is impracticable to bring them all before the court. This bill would authorize an employer to seek a workplace violence restraining order on behalf of all employees at the employer’s workplace or a location at which a group of employees perform their primary job duties if harassment, unlawful violence or a credible threat of violence is directed at that workplace or location. The bill would not require an employer to name any individual employee as a protected party if the employer seeks a workplace violence restraining order on behalf of all employees at the employer’s workplace or a location at which a group of employees perform their primary job duties.
This bill would require the Judicial Council, on or before January 1, 2028, to adopt or modify its Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 33 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 15 forms, as specified. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 527.8 of the Code of Civil Procedure proposed by AB 2179 to be operative only if this bill and AB 2179 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 527.8 of the Code of Civil Procedure proposed by AB 1753 to be operative only if (1) this bill and AB 1753 are both enacted, (2) AB 2179 is not enacted or as enacted does not amend Section 527.8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and (3) this bill is enacted last. (Based on 08/30/2026 text)
Location: 08/26/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 2179 (Patel) Workplace violence: restraining orders. (Enrollment 08/30/2026) Existing law authorizes any employer or authorized bargaining representative, as specified, whose employee has suffered unlawful violence or a credible threat of violence that can reasonably be construed to be carried out or to have been carried out at the workplace, to seek a temporary restraining order and an order after hearing on behalf of the employee and other employees at the workplace, as described. This bill would, beginning on January 1, 2028, allow any party or witness to a petition for a restraining order to appear remotely at a hearing and would prohibit any fee for appearing remotely. The bill would require the court of each county to develop rules and instructions for such remote appearances and post them on its website. The bill would also, commencing on January 1, 2028, require courts to allow filings related to such protective orders to be submitted electronically, as specified. The bill would make conforming changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 527.8 of the Code of Civil Procedure proposed by AB 1961 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1961 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (Based on 08/21/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Position: Sponsor
Notes1:
2/19/26: Bill introduced; EN tagged as sponsor. 2/24/26: EN sent draft sponsor letter to City for review. EN received final letter and sent to delegation and author's office. Bill not yet referred to a committee. 3/10/26: DA submitted sponsor letter to portal. 3/11/26: DA submitted sponsor letter to delegation. 3/24/26: SG provided primary support testimony. 4/15/26: Bill on consent. 5/29/26:
KB submitted letter to portal. 6/11/26: KB submitted letter to portal.
SB 577 (Laird) Public entities. (Enrolled 09/01/2026)
Existing law requires that specified actions for recovery of damages suffered as a result of childhood sexual assault that occurred before January 1, 2024, be commenced within 22 years of the date the plaintiff attains the age of majority or within 5 years of the date the plaintiff discovers or reasonably should have discovered that psychological injury or illness occurring after the age of majority was caused by the sexual assault, whichever period expires later. Existing law prohibits a plaintiff from commencing specified actions against a person or entity who did not commit the act of childhood sexual assault on or after the plaintiff’s 40th birthday unless the offending person or entity knew or had reason to know of any misconduct that created a risk of childhood sexual assault by an employee, volunteer, representative, or agent, or the person or entity failed to take reasonable steps or to implement reasonable safeguards to avoid acts of childhood sexual assault. Existing law provides that there is no time limit for commencement of actions for recovery Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 34 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 16 of damages suffered as a result of childhood sexual assault which occurred on or after January 1, 2024. Actions subject to these time limits include actions for liability against any person or entity who owed a duty of care to the plaintiff and an action for liability against any person or entity for an intentional act that was the legal cause of the childhood sexual assault. Existing law provides that in actions against entities for violation of a duty of care, the plaintiff must establish that the entity acted wrongfully or negligently. This bill would shorten the amount of time a victim of childhood sexual assault that occurred before January 1, 2024, would have to file a specified action to 22 years from the date the plaintiff attains the age of majority or within 3 years of the date the plaintiff discovers or reasonably should have discovered that psychological injury or illness occurring after the age of majority was caused by the sexual assault, whichever period expires later. The bill would, for actions seeking damages for childhood sexual assault that occurred before January 1, 2024, and filed on or after January 1, 2026, against a public entity, or one of its employees or agents, by a plaintiff who is 40 years of age or older, require the plaintiff to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the public entity knew of misconduct that resulted in childhood sexual assault and failed to take reasonable steps or implement safeguards to avoid it, as specified, and that the public entity negligently discharged a mandatory duty. For these cases, the bill would also require the court to review specified factors when adjudicating motions for remittitur and would authorize a court to structure judgments against public entities so that they could be paid over time. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 09/01/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Senate Enrollment
SB 951 (Reyes) Employment: technological displacement: notice. (Enrollment 08/31/2026) Existing law, the California Worker Adjustment and Retraining Act (Cal/WARN Act), prohibits an employer from ordering a mass layoff, relocation, or termination at a covered establishment unless, 60 days before the order takes effect, the employer gives written notice of the order to the employees affected by the order and to the Employment Development Department and certain local officials. Existing law makes an employer who fails to give specified notice regarding a mass layoff, relocation, or termination subject to a civil penalty of not more than $500 for each day of the employer’s violation. This bill would revise the Cal/WARN Act to also require an employer giving notice of a mass layoff, relocation, or termination caused in whole or in substantial part by an artificial intelligence (AI) system or other automated technology replacing or automating employment positions to include certain information in the notice, including the job functions performed by workers that will be automated by AI or other automated technology. The bill would require the department to publish a summary of the notices received on its internet website and to post a quarterly statewide summary of technological displacements reported. The bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2028, to submit a report to the Legislature on artificial intelligence’s effects on business hiring practices, including its impact on industries and occupations at the state and regional level. The bill would repeal the provision requiring that report on January 1, 2029. (Based on 08/21/2026 text)
Location: 09/01/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
SB 1005 (Caballero) Local agency: payment: rounding amount. (Enrolled 08/21/2026) Existing law requires a public agency to accept specified methods of payment for designated obligations. This bill would authorize a local agency to round the amount of any payment made wholly or partly in cash to the local agency, or any refund or other amount tendered wholly or partly Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 35 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 17 in cash by the local agency, to the nearest $0.05. The bill would apply to a local agency only if the governing body of the local agency adopts, by majority vote, a resolution to make its provisions applicable to the local agency. The bill would define terms for its purposes. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. (Based on 08/19/2026 text)
Location: 08/21/2026 - Senate Enrolled
SB 1187 (Durazo) Open meetings. (Enrolled 08/28/2026)
Existing law, the Ralph M. Brown Act, requires, with specified exceptions, that all meetings of a legislative body, as defined, of a local agency be open and public and that all persons be permitted to attend and participate. Existing law, beginning July 1, 2026, requires eligible legislative bodies, as defined, to have in place a system for electronically accepting and fulfilling requests for meeting agendas and documents. Existing law additionally requires these legislative bodies to translate the agenda for each meeting of that body and to reasonably assist members of the public who wish to translate a public meeting or receive interpretation, as specified. This bill would instead delete the above-described requirements on eligible legislative bodies. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/25/2026 text)
Location: 08/28/2026 - Senate Enrolled
Health and Human Services
SB 490 (Umberg) Alcohol and drug programs. (Enrolled 09/02/2026) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of adult alcohol or other drug recovery or treatment facilities by the State Department of Public Health and prohibits the operation of one of those facilities without a current valid license. Existing law requires the department, if a facility is alleged to be in violation of that prohibition, to conduct a site visit to investigate the allegation.
Existing law requires, if the department’s employee or agent finds evidence that the facility is providing services without a license, the employee or agent to take specified actions, including, among others, submitting the findings of the investigation to the department and issuing a written notice to the facility that includes the date by which the facility is required to cease providing services. This bill would require the department, if it determines it has jurisdiction over the allegation, to assign the complaint to an analyst within 10 days of receiving the allegation and, except as specified, complete the investigation within 120 days of assigning the complaint. The bill would require the department, if it receives a complaint that does not fall under its jurisdiction, to notify, to the extent feasible, the complainant that it does not investigate that type of complaint.
The bill would require the employee or agent to provide their findings to the department and would require the department to issue the notice described above within 10 days of the employee or agency submitting their findings and to conduct a followup site visit to determine whether the facility has ceased providing services as required. The bill would authorize, in counties that elect to administer the Drug Medi-Cal organized delivery system and that provide optional recovery housing services, the county behavioral health agency to request approval from the department to conduct a site visit of a recovery residence that the county contracts with that is alleged to be operating without a license. The bill would permit the department to approve that request in certain circumstances, including that the department has sufficient evidence to substantiate the Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 36 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 18 allegation. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/30/2026 text)
Location: 09/02/2026 - Senate Enrolled
Position: Support
Notes1:
Cal Cities sponsored. 4/14: City approved stance on bill. 4/16: SG and KB confirmed stance in weekly meeting. 4/17: KB sent City draft of the letter. 4/28: KB submitted letter to delegation and portal (Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee) 6/22: KB submitted letter to portal.
SB 989 (Blakespear) Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Court Program. (Enrolled 08/31/2026)
Existing law, the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, authorizes specified persons, including a person with whom the respondent resides, family members, and first responders, among others, to petition a civil court to create a voluntary CARE agreement or a court-ordered CARE plan and implement services, to be provided by county behavioral health agencies, to provide behavioral health care, including stabilization medication, housing, and other enumerated services, to adults who are currently experiencing a severe mental illness and have a diagnosis identified in the disorder class schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, and who meet other specified criteria. This bill would authorize a first responder to contact the county behavioral health agency in the county in which the individual resides or is found to request the agency file a petition to commence the CARE process. The bill would require the agency to review the request and determine whether to file a petition within 30 business days. The bill would require the agency, upon completion of the review, to notify the first responder that made the referral of specified information, including whether or not a petition was filed. Because the bill would require a higher level of service from county agencies, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. This bill would require the department to create a referral form to be used by the first responders and would require the department to issue guidance on the procedure to request that the agency file a petition to commence the CARE process. The bill would also require the agency to include specified data in their annual report to the department. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/31/2026 text)
Location: 08/28/2026 - Senate Enrollment
Homelessness
SB 16 (Blakespear) Mental health: involuntary commitment. (Enrollment 08/31/2026) Existing law, the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act, provides for the involuntary detention and treatment of persons with specified mental health disorders. Under the act, when a person, as a result of a mental health disorder, is a danger to others, or to themselves, or gravely disabled, the person may, upon probable cause, be taken into custody and placed in a facility designated by the county and approved by the State Department of Health Care Services for up to 72 hours for evaluation and treatment. Existing law authorizes a county behavioral health director to develop procedures for the county’s designation and training of professionals who will be designated to perform the Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 37 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 19 above-described provisions. This bill would instead require a county behavioral health director to establish and implement procedures governing the county’s designation and training of professionals who will be designated to perform the above-described provisions. By imposing additional duties on county behavioral health directors, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/28/2026 text)
Location: 09/01/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Notes1:
4/16/25: CP tagged as watch.
SB 329 (Blakespear) Alcohol and drug recovery: licensed treatment facilities and certified programs: investigations. (Enrolled 08/31/2026)
Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of alcohol or other drug recovery or treatment facilities by the State Department of Health Care Services. Existing law prohibits operating an alcohol or other drug recovery or treatment facility to provide recovery, treatment, or detoxification services within this state without first obtaining a current valid license. If a facility is alleged to be providing those services without a license, existing law requires the department to conduct a site visit to investigate the allegation. Existing law also authorizes the department to conduct announced or unannounced site visits to licensed facilities for the purpose of reviewing them for compliance, as specified. Existing law requires alcohol or other drug programs to be certified by the department, except as specified. Existing law prohibits those programs from operating without a certification. If a program is alleged to be providing services without a certification, existing law requires the department to conduct a site visit to investigate the allegation. Existing law also authorizes the department to conduct announced or unannounced site visits to certified programs for the purpose of reviewing them for compliance, as specified. This bill would require the department to assign a complaint under its jurisdiction regarding a licensed alcohol or other drug recovery or treatment facility or a certified alcohol or other drug program to an analyst for investigation within 10 days of receiving the complaint. If the department receives a complaint that does not fall under its jurisdiction, the bill would require the department, to the extent feasible, to notify the complainant, in writing, that it does not investigate that type of complaint. The bill would require the department to complete an investigation into a complaint regarding a facility within 120 days of assigning the complaint unless the department requires additional resources, as specified, to complete the investigation. Commencing July 1, 2027, and each July 1 thereafter, the bill would require the department to post on its internet website an annual report of the investigations conducted by the department, as specified. The bill would authorize the department to impose a single fee increase for the licensure of facilities and certification of programs, as described above, commensurate with the reasonable cost of preparing and maintaining the report. This bill contains other existing laws. (Based on 08/31/2026 text)
Location: 08/28/2026 - Senate Enrollment
Position: Support
Notes1:
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 38 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 20 4/16/25: CPPG tagged as support. 4/21/25: EN me too'd in support in Senate Appropriations.
4.21.25 CPPG sent draft letter to the City for review. 6/6/25: CPPG Submitted and sent to delegation. 6/24/25: Bill was on consent in Asm Health.
SB 692 (Arreguín) Vehicles: homelessness. (Enrolled 08/27/2026) Existing law makes it unlawful for a peace officer or an unauthorized person to remove an unattended vehicle from a highway, except as provided. Under existing law, the removal of a vehicle is a seizure, subject to the limits set forth in jurisprudence for the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Existing law authorizes a city, county, or city and county to adopt an ordinance establishing procedures for the abatement and removal, as public nuisances, of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles or parts of vehicles from private or public property. Existing law, whenever a peace officer or other public employee removes an abandoned vehicle valued at $500 or less, requires the public agency that removed, or caused the removal of, the vehicle to cause the disposal of the vehicle subject to specified requirements, including providing notice, as specified, to the registered and legal owners and any other person known to have an interest in the vehicle, and a process for the owners and interested persons to request and have a poststorage hearing, as specified. This bill would authorize a public agency of a city, county, or city and county to dismantle, or cause the dismantlement of, an abandoned vehicle, as defined, if the abandoned vehicle cannot be towed or otherwise moved and the vehicle has been declared a nuisance or hazard by a fire marshal, environmental health director, or public health officer of a city, county, or city and county, if various requirements are met, including attaching a distinctive notice to the vehicle at least 15 days prior to dismantlement that states the vehicle will be dismantled by the public agency if the hazard is not abated, sending a notice, within 48 hours of the attachment of the notice to the vehicle, to the owners and any other person known to have an interest in the vehicle informing them of specified information, including that the vehicle may be disposed of at least 15 days from the date of the notice and that they may have a hearing before the public agency if a request for a hearing is made within 10 days from the date of notice, as specified.
This bill would require a requested hearing to be conducted within 5 business days of the request.
If, after at least 15 days from the notification, the vehicle remains unclaimed, and if no request for a hearing was made or a hearing was not attended, the bill would require the public agency to provide the lienholder authorization to dismantle the vehicle. The bill would provide that a local government is not prevented from performing emergency summary abatement of an abandoned vehicle that is creating imminent health or safety hazards. This bill contains other existing laws. (Based on 08/25/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Senate Enrolled
Housing and Land Use
AB 306 (Schultz) California Building Standards Commission: appeals: code interpretations. (Enrolled 09/01/2026)
Existing law authorizes any person adversely affected by any regulation, rules, omission, interpretation, decision, or practice of any state agency respecting the administration of any building standard to appeal the issue for resolution to the California Building Standards Commission. Existing law authorizes any local agency having authority to enforce a state building standard and any person adversely affected by any regulation, rule, omission, interpretation, Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 39 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 21 decision, or practice of that agency respecting that building standard to appeal to the commission, provided that both wish to appeal the issue for resolution to the commission. Existing law authorizes the commission to accept those appeals only if the commission determines that the issues involved in the appeal have statewide significance. This bill would revise and recast those provisions to expand the reasons for which a person can appeal to the commission to include, among other things, a request for approval to use an alternate material. The bill would modify the conditions under which the commission may accept an appeal by removing the requirement that both the local agency and the adversely affected person wish to appeal the issue, and by requiring that certain issues appealed have both statewide significance and that the person seeking the appeal has exhausted all local appeals procedures before appealing to the commission, subject to a certain exception. The bill would require the commission to review those appealed issues with specified stakeholders. The bill would additionally authorize any person to request a code interpretation from the commission relative to the intent of any regulation or provision adopted by the commission. The bill would require the commission to post, on its internet website and in a searchable format, decisions on appeals and code interpretations that it issues. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 09/01/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Notes1:
4/16/25 CPPG tagged as oppose 4/21/25 CPPG sent letter to the city 5/12/25 CPPG submitted 5/15/25 CPPG sent to delegation 6/30/25: Bill included in budget; EN removed position.
AB 750 (Quirk-Silva) Department of Housing and Community Development. (Enrolled 09/01/2026)
Existing law authorizes the Department of Housing and Community Development, upon appropriation, to make loans or grants, or both loans and grants, to rehabilitate, capitalize operating subsidy reserves for, and extend the long-term affordability of department-funded housing projects that have an affordability restriction that has expired, that have an affordability restriction with a remaining term of less than 10 years, or are otherwise at risk of conversion to market-rate housing. This bill would also authorize the department to make those loans and grants to rehabilitate, capitalize operating subsidy reserves for, and extend the long-term affordability of housing projects that qualify as a challenged development, as defined. The bill would require the department to grant priority for these loans and grants to housing projects that are department funded and have an affordability restriction that has expired or have a remaining term of less than 10 years, or are otherwise at risk for conversion, as defined. The bill would authorize the department to establish separate selection and underwriting standards for these projects and projects that are challenged developments. The bill would require, prior to allocating program funds, the department to evaluate the above-described developments to help inform program guidelines and allocation decisions. The bill would require the department to allocate at least 10% of funds of every round to challenged developments that are not department-funded, as specified. (Based on 09/01/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 40 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 22 AB 956 (Quirk-Silva) Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units. (Enrolled 09/01/2026)
Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, provides for the creation by local ordinance, or by ministerial approval if a local agency has not adopted an ordinance, of accessory dwelling units in areas zoned for single-family or multifamily dwelling residential use in accordance with specified standards and conditions. Existing law also provides for the creation of junior accessory dwelling units by local ordinance, or, if a local agency has not adopted an ordinance, by ministerial approval, in single-family residential zones in accordance with specified standards and conditions.
Existing law, the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, among other things, makes void and unenforceable any covenant, restriction, or condition contained in any instrument affecting the transfer or sale of any interest in a planned development, and any provision of a governing document, that effectively prohibits or unreasonably restricts the construction or use of an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit on a lot zoned for single-family residential use that meets the above-described standards and conditions for those units. This bill would revise the provision governing prohibitions or restrictions on the construction or use of an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit on a lot zoned for single-family residential use to instead apply to a lot zoned to allow single-family residential use. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 09/01/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Position: Oppose
Notes1:
6/9/26: City Council approved oppose position. 6/30/26: KB followed up with the City on the draft letter. 7/1/26: KB submitted letter to portal and delegation (Senate Housing Committee, Assembly Local Government Committee, Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee, Assembly Appropriations Committee, Senate Local Government Committee) 7/1/26: KR testified in opposition at Senate Local Government Committee
AB 1294 (Haney) Real property tax: welfare exemption: moderate-income housing. (Enrollment 08/31/2026)
Existing property tax law, pursuant to constitutional authorization, provides for a “welfare exemption” for property used exclusively for religious, hospital, scientific, or charitable purposes and that is owned or operated by certain types of nonprofit entities, if certain qualifying criteria are met. That law provides a partial welfare exemption in the case of residential rental property used for lower income households, as specified, calculated as that percentage of the value of the property that is equal to the percentage that the number of units serving lower income households represents of the total number of residential units. This bill would, for lien dates commencing on or after January 1, 2027, and before January 1, 2030, provide a partial welfare exemption in the case of certain residential rental property used for low- and moderate-income households. The partial exemption would be equal to the value of the units serving low- and moderate-income households, as defined. The bill would require an owner to make specified certifications relating to the use of the property. The bill would apply the exemption described above for a period of 15 years from the date of the initial filing of the exemption, as specified. By expanding the duties of local tax officials, and by expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/21/2026 text) Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 41 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 23
Location: 09/01/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Position: Watch
Notes1:
6/9/26: Council approved oppose stance; letter in draft. 7/1/26: Position move to watch because the bill was gut and amended. No draft letter sent as amendment happened 6/15.
AB 1621 (Wilson) Planning and Zoning Law: postentitlement phase permits: Housing Accountability Act. (Enrolled 08/31/2026)
The Planning and Zoning Law requires a local agency or state agency to compile one or more lists that specify in detail the information required from any applicant for a postentitlement phase permit, as defined. Existing law also establishes time limits for completing reviews regarding whether an application for a postentitlement phase permit is complete and compliant, and whether to approve or deny an application. Existing law requires the time limits to be tolled, if the local agency or state agency requires review of the application by an outside entity, until the outside entity completes the review and returns the application, as specified. This bill would prohibit a local agency or state agency from requiring or requesting more than 2 plan check and specification reviews in connection with an application for a building permit, as part of its review.
The bill would authorize a local agency or state agency to deny an application that is not compliant with the permit standards following 2 plan check and specification reviews. The bill would also authorize an applicant to request additional submittals of applications that are not compliant with the permit standards. The bill, if a local agency or state agency finds that a complete application is noncompliant, would prohibit a local agency or state agency from requesting or requiring any action or inaction as a result of a building inspection undertaken to assess compliance with the applicable building permit standards that would represent a deviation from a previously approved building plan or similar approval for the building permit, except as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/27/2026 text)
Location: 08/31/2026 - Assembly Enrolled
Position: Oppose
Notes1:
6/9/26: City Council approved oppose position. 6/30/26: KB followed up with the City on the draft letter. 7/1/26: KB submitted letter to portal and delegation: Senate Housing Committee, Assembly Local Government Committee, Senate Local Government Committee, Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee, Senate Appropriations Committee, Assembly Appropriations Committee 6/30/26: SG testified in opposition in Senate Housing
AB 1679 (González, Mark) Local pop-up small business program. (Enrolled 09/01/2026) Existing law establishes various programs to promote small businesses operating in nonstandard locations, including cottage food operations and sidewalk vendors, and imposes requirements on, and provides authorizations to, local governments relating to these programs. Existing law authorizes the legislative body of an incorporated city or the board of supervisors of a county, as applicable, to license any kind of business not prohibited by law, transacted and carried on within Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 42 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 24 the limits of the jurisdiction of the city or county, and to fix the rate of the license fee and provide for its collection, as provided. This bill would require a city, including a charter city, county, or city and county, defined as a local jurisdiction to allow temporary commercial activation authorization for a pop-up small business, as those terms are defined, to operate for no more than 120 days in an eligible commercial space without requiring full compliance with standards applicable to permanent occupancy, as specified. The bill would require a local jurisdiction to consider temporarily suspending, deferring, or modifying specified standards and discretionary requirements. The bill would require a temporary commercial activation to comply with health and safety standards governing temporary use and structures, as specified. This bill would further require a local jurisdiction to provide written accessibility compliance guidance materials to an applicant. The bill would authorize a local jurisdiction to establish fees not exceeding the reasonable costs of program administration and create enforcement mechanisms and penalties for noncompliance. By requiring a city, including a charter city, county, or city and county to allow temporary commercial activation authorization for pop-up small businesses, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 09/01/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 1738 (Carrillo) State Housing Law: remote inspections. (Enrolled 08/28/2026) Existing law, the State Housing Law, establishes statewide construction and occupancy standards for buildings used for human habitation. Existing law requires the building department of every city or county to enforce the provisions of the State Housing Law, the State Building Standards Code, and other specified rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the State Housing Law pertaining to standards for buildings used for human habitation. Existing law authorizes an officer, employee, or agent of an enforcement agency to enter and inspect any building or premises whenever necessary to secure compliance with, or prevent a violation of, any provision of the State Housing Law, the building standards published in the State Building Standards Code, and other rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the provisions of the State Housing Law. Existing law provides certain immunities to a public entity or employee immunity relative to an inspection or license, as provided. This bill would require a city, including a charter city, county, or city and county, except as specified, to offer a homeowner or contractor, as described, the option of requesting remote inspections for all or a subset of an inspection required by a building permit for specified works in one- or 2-family dwelling units, by either January 1, 2028, or July 1, 2028, as provided. The bill would authorize these local agencies to adopt reasonable protocols governing the technical conduct of a remote inspection, as specified. The bill would apply the above- described immunities to remote inspections. The bill would authorize these local agencies to temporarily ban the homeowner or contractor from using the remote inspection if a homeowner is found to have willfully misrepresented the work, as provided. By imposing new duties on local agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/26/2026 text)
Location: 08/28/2026 - Assembly Enrolled
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 43 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 25 AB 1751 (Quirk-Silva) Missing Middle Townhome Ownership Act. (Enrolled 08/30/2026) Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, contains various provisions requiring a local government that receives an application for certain types of qualified housing developments to review the application under a streamlined, ministerial approval process, depending on the type of housing development, as specified. Existing law, the Subdivision Map Act, vests the authority to regulate and control the design and improvement of subdivisions in the legislative body of a local agency and sets forth procedures governing the local agency’s processing, approval, conditional approval or disapproval, and filing of tentative, final, and parcel maps, and the modification thereof. The act generally requires a subdivider to file a tentative map or vesting tentative map with the local agency, as specified, and the local agency, in turn, to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the map within a specified time period. Existing law, known as the Starter Home Revitalization Act of 2021, among other things, requires a local agency to ministerially consider, without discretionary review or a hearing, a parcel map or a tentative and final map for a housing development project that meets certain requirements, including that the housing development project on the lot proposed to be subdivided will contain 10 or fewer residential units, except as provided. This bill, the Missing Middle Townhome Ownership Act, would authorize a development proponent to submit an application for a townhome development project that is subject to a prescribed ministerial approval process if the development complies with certain procedural requirements and satisfies specified objective planning standards. The bill would also require a local agency to ministerially consider, without discretionary review or a hearing, a tentative and final map for a townhome development project that meets specified requirements, including that the proposed subdivision complies with the requirements established by the bill for ministerial approval of a townhome development project, as described in the preceding sentence, and that the newly created parcels are no smaller than 600 square feet. The act would define “townhome” for these purposes to mean a single-family dwelling unit that is less than or equal to 3 stories of occupiable square footage and either shares a common wall, as specified, or is separated from one or more neighboring units by no more than a specified fire separation distance, and would define “townhome development project” to mean a housing development project that consists entirely of residential units that satisfy this definition of townhome and meets prescribed density requirements, size requirements, and unit limits. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/30/2026 text)
Location: 08/26/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Position: Oppose
Notes1:
7/7/26: Subcommittee voted to oppose; EN tagged as oppose. 7/17: KB sent draft letter to client. 8/13: Submitted to delegation.
AB 1997 (Lee) Land use: housing development approvals: timelines and processes. (Enrolled 08/31/2026)
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect.
CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 44 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 26 have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. The Permit Streamlining Act sets forth various procedures for the review and approval of development project applications. Among other things, the act requires a public agency that is the lead agency or a responsible agency for a development project to approve or disapprove the project within a specified period of time, which varies depending on the project’s phase in the CEQA process. The act defines “development project” to include specified housing development projects, as provided. This bill would additionally require approval or disapproval of a housing development project within 30 days from the date of certification by the lead agency of the EIR, if the EIR is prepared pursuant to specified provisions of CEQA if certain other conditions are met. The bill would also define “housing development project” for the purposes of the Permit Streamlining Act and make additional conforming changes. By imposing additional duties on local agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/27/2026 text)
Location: 08/31/2026 - Assembly Enrolled
AB 2012 (Hoover) Vehicles: transportation of manufactured homes. (Enrollment 08/31/2026) Existing law authorizes the Department of Transportation or a local authority, upon application in writing and if good cause appears, to issue a special or annual permit for the transporting of a manufactured home that does not exceed 14 feet in total width, exclusive of lights and devices, upon any highway, as specified. Existing law prescribes specified requirements and conditions for transporting the above-described manufactured homes and additional requirements and conditions for manufactured homes exceeding 14 feet but not exceeding 16 feet in width, including requiring the Department of Transportation, in cooperation with the Department of the California Highway Patrol, or the local authority to require pilot car or special escort services for the movement of these manufactured housing units, and makes it unlawful for a person to violate the terms or conditions of a permit issued to haul specified loads, including the above-described permits. Existing regulations provide a schedule for the number of pilot cars and Department of the California Highway Patrol escorts that are required based on the width and length of the load and the route class. This bill would remove the good cause requirement for the department or the local authority to issue the above-described permits. The bill would expand the issuance of a special or annual permit to include transportation of a manufactured home, factory-built housing, and commercial modular, as defined, not exceeding 14 feet in total width. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would clarify that a special permit is not required to move a manufactured home, factory-built housing, or commercial modular if the applicant has obtained an annual permit. The bill would authorize the Department of Transportation, in cooperation with the Department of the California Highway Patrol, or the local authority to require pilot car or special escort services for the movement of the above-described manufactured housing units, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/21/2026 text)
Location: 09/01/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 45 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 27 AB 2051 (Wicks) Public resources: coastal resources: Coastal Resilience Permitting Working Group. (Enrolled 09/02/2026)
The California Coastal Act of 1976 requires any person wishing to perform or undertake any development in the coastal zone, as defined, in addition to obtaining any other permit required by law from any local government or from any state, regional, or local agency, to obtain a coastal development permit, as provided. The act requires each local government lying in whole or in part within the coastal zone to prepare a local coastal program for that portion of the coastal zone within its jurisdiction. The act requires a land use plan of a proposed local coastal program to be submitted to the California Coastal Commission for certification. The act authorizes the commission to extend, for a period not to exceed one year, certain time limitations relating to local coastal programs for good cause. This bill would authorize the commission to retroactively extend, for good cause and a period not to exceed 5 years, a time limitation established for a local government to act on the commission’s suggested modifications to a land use plan amendment that would authorize approval of an affordable housing development, as specified. This bill contains other existing laws. (Based on 09/02/2026 text)
Location: 08/28/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 2152 (González, Mark) California Environmental Quality Act: essential local fire station projects: infrastructure project streamlining. (Enrollment 08/30/2026) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect.
CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. Existing law authorizes the Governor to certify projects meeting certain requirements as infrastructure projects and provide those certified projects with certain streamlining benefits, including requiring the lead agency to prepare the record of proceedings concurrently with the environmental review process and requiring the resolution of an action or proceeding challenging the certification of an EIR for certified projects or the granting of any project approvals, to the extent feasible, within 270 days of the filing of the record of proceedings with the court, as specified. Existing law requires the lead agency, within 10 days of the certification of an infrastructure project, to provide a public notice of the certification, as provided. If a lead agency fails to approve a project certified as an infrastructure project before January 1, 2033, existing law specifies that the certification is no longer valid. Existing law requires the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation to make evidence and materials submitted for the certification of a project available to the public on its internet website at least 15 days before the certification of the project.
This bill would also authorize the Governor to certify an essential local fire station project for streamlining as an infrastructure project if the Governor ensures that the project meets specified requirements, including, among others, that the applicant agrees to pay the costs of the trial court and the court of appeal in hearing and deciding any case challenging a lead agency’s action on the project, and the applicant agrees to pay the costs of preparing the record of proceedings for the project, as specified. The bill would require a project to meet specified requirements to be eligible for certification as an essential local fire station project. The bill would require the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, for an essential local fire station project, to provide the Governor’s Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 46 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 28 office with evidence and materials to support consideration of the application no later than 45 days after the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation posts the evidence and materials submitted for certification on its internet website. This bill contains other existing laws. (Based on 08/27/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 2296 (Papan) Planning and zoning: housing element: regional housing needs allocation. (Enrolled 08/30/2026)
Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, requires each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city, which includes, among other mandatory elements, a housing element. For the 4th and subsequent revisions of the housing element, existing law requires the Department of Housing and Community Development, in consultation with each council of governments, to determine each region’s existing and projected need for housing, and requires the appropriate council of governments, or the department for cities and counties without a council of governments, to adopt a final regional housing plan that allocates a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county, as provided. This bill, except with respect to the 7th housing element cycle for councils of governments with a housing element revision due date during the calendar year 2027, 2028, or 2029, would extend the above-described timeline for cities and counties to form a subregional entity to allocate the subregion’s housing need, as provided, from 28 months to 34 months, and the above-described timeline for the council of governments to determine the share of regional housing need assigned to each subregion from 25 months to 31 months, respectively. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/30/2026 text)
Location: 08/26/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Position: Support
Notes1:
4/14: City approved stance on bill. 4/16: SG and KB confirmed stance in weekly meeting. 4/17: KB sent City draft of the letter. 4/22/26: II testified in support on behalf of the city in Assembly Local Government committee. 4/28/26: KB submitted letter of support to delegation and portal (Assembly Appropriations Committee, Assembly Local Government Committee, and Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee).
AB 2433 (Alvarez) Housing development: density bonus. (Enrollment 08/30/2026) Existing law, commonly referred to as the Density Bonus Law, requires a city or county to grant a density bonus, other incentives or concessions, and waivers or reductions of development standards, as specified, to an applicant for a housing development when the applicant seeks a density bonus for the housing development, as specified, if the applicant agrees to construct, among other things, a specified percentage of units for very low income, lower income, or senior citizen housing, and meets other requirements. This bill would, instead, require a city or county to grant a density bonus, other incentives or concessions, and waivers or reductions of development standards, as specified, to an applicant for a housing development when the applicant submits an application for a housing development that a city, county, or city and county determines meets specified criteria, including, among others, the housing development includes specified Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 47 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 29 percentage of units for very low income, lower income, or senior citizen housing. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/20/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Position: Oppose Unless Amended
Notes1:
4/16/26: KB marked as watch per client request. 5/13/26: KB marked as OUA per client request. 5/15/26: KB shared draft letter with the client. 5/29/26: KB submitted letter to portal and delegation. 6/17/26: KB submitted letter to portal. 6/23/26: KB testified in Senate Local Gov.
AB 2576 (Harabedian) Transit-oriented development: exclusions: historic sites. (Enrolled 08/27/2026)
Existing law provides that a housing development project shall be an allowed use as a transit- oriented housing development if specified conditions and requirements are met. Existing law provides that these provisions do not apply to a local agency until July 1, 2026, unless the local agency adopts an ordinance or local transit-oriented development alternative plan, as defined, deemed compliant by the Department of Housing and Community Development before July 1, 2026. Existing law specifies that, beginning on January 1, 2027, a local government that denies a housing development project meeting the requirements referenced above that is located in a high- resource area is presumed to be in violation of specified law and immediately liable for specified penalties. Existing law specifies exclusions from the provisions described above, including, among other sites prior to one year following the adoption of the 7th revision of the housing element, a site with a historic resource designated as of January 1, 2025, on a local register. This bill would also exclude from the provisions described above, a contributing site within a historic district included on the State Historic Resources Inventory designated before January 1, 2025, and a parcel individually listed as a historical resource included on the State Historic Resources Inventory designated before January 1, 2025. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 65912.161 of the Government Code proposed by AB 2415 to be operative only if this bill and AB 2415 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (Based on 08/24/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Assembly Enrolled
AB 2601 (Lee) Planning and zoning: housing development: streamlined approval and subdivisions. (Enrollment 08/30/2026)
Under the Planning and Zoning Law, the legislative body of a city or county may adopt ordinances that, among other things, regulate the use of buildings, structures, and land, as provided. The Subdivision Map Act vests the authority to regulate and control the design and improvement of subdivisions in the legislative body of a local agency and sets forth procedures governing the local agency’s processing, approval, conditional approval or disapproval, and filing of tentative, final, and parcel maps. This bill would require that an application for a proposed housing development containing no more than 2 residential units within a single-family residential zone, as described above, be eligible for concurrent processing with an application for a parcel map for an urban lot split, as provided. The bill would authorize a local agency to condition issuance of building permits, grading permits, or certificates of occupancy for a proposed housing development upon the applicant first obtaining approval and recording a parcel map for eligible parcels pursuant to the Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 48 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 30 above-described urban lot split provisions. The bill would specify that a “parcel map” for purposes of these provisions means a parcel map prepared in accordance with specified provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and may include a condominium plan if proposed by the subdivider, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/21/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 2689 (Ávila Farías) Low-income housing tax credits: lease nonrenewal: good cause. (Enrollment 08/30/2026)
Existing law, in modified conformity with federal income tax laws, establishes a low-income housing tax credit program through which the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee allocates low-income housing tax credits aimed at providing affordable low-income housing within and throughout the state. Existing federal law sets limitations and guidelines regarding what projects are eligible for credits, including a requirement that an extended low-income housing commitment is in effect, and a prohibition against eviction except for good cause. This bill would specify, for housing projects where the low-income housing commitment requires 100% of the units, not including any manager’s units, to be restricted to lower income households, as defined, that good cause for nonrenewal of a lease includes cases where the nonrenewal relates to a household whose income exceeds 140% of the area median income for at least 2 consecutive years and 30% of the household’s monthly income exceeds the fair market rent, determined as specified. The bill would require an owner to provide notice of the potential of good cause for nonrenewal described above if the household’s income exceeds 140% of the area median income during any income certification, as specified. The bill would also require an owner electing to not renew a lease as described above to issue a notice of nonrenewal describing the basis of good cause for nonrenewal at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the lease, as specified. (Based on 06/22/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
SB 328 (Grayson) California Environmental Quality Act: exempt surplus land. (Enrolled 09/01/2026)
Existing law requires a local agency to declare land either “surplus land” or “exempt surplus land,” as supported by written findings, before the local agency may take any action to dispose of it consistent with an agency’s policies or procedures and defines terms for these purposes. Existing law generally requires a local agency, before disposing or negotiating to dispose of surplus land, to provide a written notice of the availability of the surplus land to specified entities and housing sponsors. Existing law provides that an agency is not required to follow the requirements for the disposal of surplus land for “exempt surplus land.” Existing law defines “exempt surplus land” to include certain types of land, including, surplus land totaling 10 or more acres, consisting of either a single parcel, or 2 or more adjacent or nonadjacent parcels combined for disposition to one or more buyers pursuant to a plan or ordinance adopted by the legislative body of the local agency, or a state statute and certain surplus land that is a former military base, known as the Alameda Naval Air Station, if specified conditions are met. Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, requires each county and each city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city, and specified land outside its boundaries, that includes, among other specified mandatory elements, a housing element. That law requires the planning agency of a city or county to provide by April 1 of each year an annual report to, among other entities, the Office Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 49 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 31 of Land Use and Climate Innovation. This bill would revise the definition of “exempt surplus land” to remove the reference to buyers and instead mean 2 or more adjacent or nonadjacent parcels combined for disposition to one or more persons or entities, as specified. The bill would also exempt surplus land that is a former military base that was conveyed by the federal government to a local agency or a local reuse authority, and that is all or any portion of the Concord Naval Weapons Station, if certain requirements are met, including that the former military base has an aggregate area greater than 5 acres and that before disposition of the land, the local agency or local reuse authority has entered into a disposition and development agreement that stipulates that at least 25% of the aggregate residential units permitted to be developed will be restricted to lower income households with an affordable housing cost or affordable rent for a minimum of 55 years for rental housing and 45 years for owner-occupied housing, as specified. The bill would regulate actions challenging the disposition and would prescribe penalties for violations of these provisions. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 09/01/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Senate Enrollment
SB 417 (Limón) The Veterans and Affordable Housing Bond Act of 2026. (Chaptered 06/25/2026)
Under existing law, there are programs providing assistance for, among other things, emergency housing, multifamily housing, farmworker housing, home ownership for very low and low-income households, and downpayment assistance for first-time home buyers. Existing law also authorizes the issuance of bonds in specified amounts pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law and requires that proceeds from the sale of these bonds be used to finance various existing housing programs, capital outlay related to infill development, brownfield cleanup that promotes infill development, and housing-related parks. Existing law, the Veterans and Affordable Housing Bond Act of 2018, authorized, the issuance of bonds in the amount of $4,000,000,000 to finance various existing housing programs, as well as infill infrastructure financing and affordable housing matching grant programs, as well as financing for a specified program for farm, home, and mobilehome purchase assistance for veterans, pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law.
This bill would enact the Veterans and Affordable Housing Bond Act of 2026, which, if adopted, would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $11,250,000,000, pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law. Of the proceeds from the sale of these bonds, $10,000,000,000 would be used to finance programs to fund affordable rental housing and home ownership programs, including, among others, the Multifamily Housing Program, the CalHome Program, and the Joe Serna, Jr. Farmworker Housing Grant Program, and $1,250,000,000 would be used to provide additional funding for the above-described program for farm, home, and mobilehome purchase assistance for veterans, as provided. This bill would provide for submission of the bond act to the voters at the November 3, 2026, statewide general election, in accordance with specified law. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. (Based on 06/25/2026 text)
Location: 06/25/2026 - Senate Chaptered
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 50 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 32 SB 677 (Wiener) Housing financing: joint powers agreements: bond approvals: subdivisions:
tentative and final maps: appeals. (Enrolled 09/01/2026) Existing law, the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, authorizes 2 or more public agencies, by agreement, to form a joint powers authority to exercise any power common to the contracting parties, as specified. Existing law, for the purposes of that act, defines the term “public agency” to include various federal, state, local, and tribal entities. Existing law requires approval by the Department of General Services of certain joint powers agreements that include the state as a member, as provided. Existing law authorizes a joint powers authority to issue revenue bonds to pay the costs and expenses of acquiring, constructing, or conducting a program for, among other things, low- income housing projects owned or operated by a city, county, city and county, or housing authority.
Existing law provides that the Treasurer and the Secretary of State are designated as elected representatives for federal tax purposes of a joint powers agency created to approve or certify the issuance of bonds, notes, or other evidence of indebtedness issued by or on behalf of the joint powers agency to the extent approval is required by federal tax law. This bill would provide that the geographic jurisdiction of a joint powers authority is the area encompassed by the combined geographical boundaries of all of its member public agencies. The bill would declare that these provisions are declaratory of existing law. This bill would additionally authorize the Treasurer to execute an agreement including the state as a member of a joint powers authority without obtaining approval from the Department of General Services only for the Treasurer to provide specified approvals for bonds issued by the joint powers authority to finance specified residential rental projects for which a city, county, or city and county that is a member of the joint powers authority has failed to provide specified approval required by federal tax law, as defined and provided. The bill would provide that its provisions do not expand, limit, or otherwise affect the authority of, among others, the state, or any officer or agency of the state, to enter into a joint exercise of powers agreement or cause the state to become a member of a joint powers authority, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 09/01/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Senate Enrollment
Notes1:
1/13/26: EN tagged as oppose. 1/14/26: KR testified in opposition in Senate Local Government Committee. 1/15/26: SG sent draft oppose letter to the City for review. 1/26/26: EN received final Word draft of letter, finalized, and sent back to the City for their records. 1/26/26: DA submitted letter to portal and delegation. 6/9/26: Bill gut and amended; EN removed position.
SB 716 (Durazo) Local government: ordinances: penalties for violation: nonresidential structures. (Enrollment 08/31/2026)
Existing law makes the violation of a county ordinance or a city ordinance a misdemeanor unless by ordinance it is made an infraction. Existing law specifies monetary fines for any violation of local ordinances that is an infraction, not to exceed specified amounts that vary based on the circumstances of the violation, as prescribed. This bill would, notwithstanding those provisions, authorize the county board of supervisors to impose fines, penalties, and forfeitures for violations of ordinances and to fix the penalty by a fine or imprisonment, or both. The bill would also establish the amount of the fine that may be imposed for the violation of a city or county ordinance, where the violation pertains to a nonresidential structure with a floor area of 20,000 or more square feet and the violation poses a threat to health and safety, to not exceed $1,000 for the first violation, Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 51 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 33 $2,000 for the 2nd violation within 5 years of the first violation, and $5,000 for subsequent violations within 5 years of the first violation, as specified. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Los Angeles. (Based on 08/28/2026 text)
Location: 09/01/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
SB 722 (Wahab) Transit-oriented housing development: excluded parcels and sites. (Chaptered 07/16/2026)
Existing law requires that a housing development project, as defined, within a specified distance of a transit-oriented development stop, as defined, be an allowed use as a transit-oriented housing development on any site zoned for residential, mixed, or commercial development, if the development complies with certain, applicable requirements, as provided. Among these requirements, existing law prohibits a proposed development under these provisions from being located on sites where the development would require demolition of housing, or that was previously used for housing, that is subject to rent or price controls, as provided. This bill would additionally prohibit the development from being located on an existing parcel of land or site governed under the Mobilehome Residency Law, the Recreational Vehicle Park Occupancy Law, the Mobilehome Parks Act, or the Special Occupancy Parks Act. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. (Based on 07/16/2026 text)
Location: 07/16/2026 - Senate Chaptered
Position: Support
Notes1:
1/14/26: DA tagged as support. 1/15/26: SG sent draft support letter to the City for review. 1/26/26:
EN received final Word draft of letter, finalized, and sent back to the City for their records. 1/26/26:
DA submitted letter to portal and delegation. 5/5/26: KB submitted letter to portal. 6/10/26: Bill on consent in Asm HCD. 6/11/26: KB submitted letter to portal. 6/17/26: CS attended committee - bill on consent.
SB 741 (Blakespear) Low Carbon Transit Operations Program. (Enrolled 09/01/2026) Existing law creates the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program to provide operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases and improve mobility.
Existing law requires the Department of Transportation to administer the program and to adopt guidelines, in coordination with the State Air Resources Board, that describe the methodologies to be used by a recipient transit agency to demonstrate that proposed expenditures will meet specified program expenditure requirements and establish the reporting requirements for documenting ongoing compliance with those expenditure requirements. This bill would repeal the requirement for the department to adopt guidelines. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 09/01/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Senate Enrollment
Position: Support
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 52 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 34 Notes1:
5/19/25: CPPG tagged as support and sent draft support letter to the City for review. 6/9/25: CPPG Submitted letter and sent to delegation. 7/7/25: Bill pulled from Asm Natural Resources 7/7 hearing. 6/29/26: SG - Testified in support in Assembly Transportation committee.
SB 996 (Padilla) Manufactured housing: conformity. (Enrolled 09/02/2026) The Manufactured Housing Act of 1980 sets forth various standards relating to manufactured homes, mobilehomes, special purpose commercial coaches, and commercial coaches, including, but not limited to, construction and alteration of those homes. Existing law, including the Manufactured Housing Act of 1980 and the Uniform Commercial Code–Secured Transactions, defines the term “manufactured home” for various purposes to mean a structure that, among other things, is transportable in one or more sections, is 8 body feet or more in width, or 40 body feet or more in length, in the traveling mode, or, when erected on site, is 320 or more square feet, and is built on a permanent chassis. This bill would modify that definition to mean a structure that was constructed on or after June 15, 1976, with or without a foundation system, and has the same meaning as defined in specified federal law. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/30/2026 text)
Location: 09/02/2026 - Senate Enrolled
SB 1014 (Grayson) Development projects: preliminary estimate of required improvements:
onsite and offsite improvements. (Enrolled 08/31/2026)
Existing law, the Permit Streamlining Act (act), sets forth various procedures for the review and approval of development project applications, including, among other things, requiring each public agency to compile one or more lists that specify in detail the information that will be required from any applicant for a development project. The act also requires a city, county, or city and county to deem an applicant for a housing development project to have submitted a preliminary application upon providing specified information about the proposed project to the city, county, or city and county from which approval for the project is being sought. This bill would permit an applicant who submits a preliminary application for a housing development project, as specified, or an application if a preliminary application is not submitted, to include in the preliminary application or application a request for a preliminary estimate of required improvements, as provided. The bill would require a city, county, or city and county that receives a request under these provisions to provide the preliminary estimate within 30 business days of the submission of the request, as provided. The bill would authorize, for improvements required by a public agency, as specified, the applicant to request, within 30 days of submission, a list of the types of improvements that may be required, as provided. The bill, within 30 business days of deeming an application for a postentitlement phase permit complete, would additionally require the city, county, or city and county to provide the applicant with an itemized list of all onsite and offsite improvements that will be required prior to issuance of, or otherwise in connection with, that permit, as provided. The bill would specify that its provisions do not relieve a city, county, or city and county of its obligation to comply with certain requirements before subjecting a housing development project to an improvement that was not in effect when a preliminary application was submitted, as provided. The bill would define various terms for these purposes. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/28/2026 text)
Location: 08/31/2026 - Senate Enrolled
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 53 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 35 Position: Oppose
Notes1:
4/14: City approved stance on bill. 4/16: SG and KB confirmed stance in weekly meeting. 4/17: KB sent City draft of the letter. 4/28: KB submitted letter to delegation and portal (Senate Housing Committee, Senate Appropriations Committee, Senate Local Government Committee) 6/9: KB submitted letter to portal. 6/17/26: CS testified in opposition in Asm. Local Gov. 6/24/26: CS testified in opposition in Asm. Housing.
SB 1036 (Grayson) Mitigation Fee Act. (Chaptered 06/30/2026) Existing law, the Mitigation Fee Act, imposes various requirements with respect to the establishment, increase, or imposition of a fee by a local agency as a condition of approval of a development project, including requiring the local agency to identify the use to which the fee is to be put and determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. This bill would require the amount of a fee that is imposed on a development project that demolishes or changes an existing use to be offset to account for the demolition or change so that the amount of the fee is attributable only to the development project’s incremental impact on public facilities or services, as provided. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 06/30/2026 text)
Location: 06/30/2026 - Senate Chaptered
Position: Watch
SB 1116 (Caballero) Planning and zoning: housing development projects: subdivisions. (Enrolled 08/31/2026)
Under the Planning and Zoning Law, the legislative body of a city or county may adopt ordinances that, among other things, regulate the use of buildings, structures, and land, as provided. The Subdivision Map Act vests the authority to regulate and control the design and improvement of subdivisions in the legislative body of a local agency and sets forth procedures governing the local agency’s processing, approval, conditional approval or disapproval, and filing of tentative, final, and parcel maps. Existing law authorizes a development proponent to submit an application for a housing development project on a subdivided lot, as specified, that meets specified requirements, and requires a local agency to ministerially consider that application, as specified. Existing law prohibits a local agency from imposing on a housing development on a lot subdivided as specified an objective zoning standard, objective subdivision standard, or objective design standard that, among other things, physically precludes the development of a project built to specified densities.
However, with respect to certain lots, existing law allows a local agency to impose a height limit of no less than the height allowed pursuant to the existing zoning designation applicable to the lot.
This bill would require the height limits under these provisions to apply exclusively to the physical height of a building rather than the number of floors. The bill would additionally prohibit a local agency from imposing specified front or internal setbacks, except as specified. The bill would also modify prohibitions relating to density on the lot, among other things. The bill would require that the above-described provisions relating to ministerial approval of housing developments on certain subdivided lots be interpreted liberally in favor of producing the maximum number of total housing units. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/28/2026 text)
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 54 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 36 Location: 08/31/2026 - Senate Enrolled
SB 1117 (Cervantes) Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units. (Enrolled 08/30/2026)
Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, among other things, provides for the creation by ordinance, or by ministerial approval if the local agency has not adopted an ordinance, of an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) in accordance with specified standards and conditions. Existing law requires fees charged for the construction of ADUs to be determined in accordance with specified provisions of the Mitigation Fee Act. Existing law prohibits a local agency, special district, or water corporation from imposing any impact fee upon the development of an ADU that has 750 square feet of interior livable space or less, and requires any impact fees charged for an ADU that has more than 750 square feet of interior livable space to be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. This bill would require the charge for certain accessory dwelling units to be based only on the area in excess of 750 square feet of interior livable space. By changing the duties of local agencies with regard to calculating fees for ADUs, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/27/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Senate Enrolled
SB 1169 (Grayson) Subdivision Map Act: tentative maps: expiration dates. (Enrolled 08/30/2026)
Existing law, the Subdivision Map Act, (act) vests the authority to regulate and control the design and improvement of subdivisions in the legislative body of a local agency and sets forth procedures governing the processing, approval, conditional approval or disapproval, and filing of tentative maps, among other maps. Existing law requires a vesting tentative map to be filed and processed in the same manner as a tentative map, except as specified. The act generally requires a subdivider to file a tentative map with the local agency, as specified, and the local agency, in turn, to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the map within a specified time period. Under existing law, an approved tentative map expires 24 months after its approval or conditional approval. Existing law authorizes the approval or conditional approval to be extended up to 24 months pursuant to local ordinance, and by 48 months, as provided, if the subdivider is required to expend more than a certain amount of money to construct, improve, or finance the construction or improvement of public improvements outside the property boundaries of the tentative map, as provided. provided, except as specified. This bill would extend the initial expiration period of an approved or conditionally approved tentative map to 48 months and the extension pursuant to local ordinance to 36 months, except as provided. The bill would also apply all of the above-described timelines to any approved or conditionally approved tentative map that is not expired as of December 31, 2026.
The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/30/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Senate Enrollment
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 55 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 37 SB 1272 (Menjivar) Local ordinances: administrative fines or penalties. (Enrolled 08/30/2026) Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a local agency, as defined, to, by ordinance, make any violation of an ordinance subject to an administrative fine or penalty. Existing law requires a local agency to set forth, by ordinance, the administrative procedures that govern the imposition, enforcement, collection, and administrative review of those administrative fines or penalties.
Existing law requires the administrative procedures to provide for a reasonable period of time, as specified in the ordinance, for a person responsible for a continuing violation to correct or otherwise remedy the violation prior to the imposition of administrative fines or penalties, when the violation pertains to building, plumbing, electrical, or other similar structural or zoning issues, that do not create an immediate danger to health or safety. This bill would require, for any violation pertaining to building, plumbing, electrical, or other similar structural or zoning issues, that do not create an immediate danger to health or safety, of any ordinance enacted by the local agency, the reasonable period of time to correct or otherwise remedy the violation to be no less than 6 months if certain conditions are met, including that the property involved is an owner-occupied residential property containing 4 units or less and the current owner of the property submits a sworn affidavit that the current owner was not responsible for any action that caused the violation and that the current owner had no knowledge of the violation at the time the owner took title to the property.
These provisions would not apply to an administrative fine or penalty imposed for a violation of various laws, regulations, and ordinances, as specified. By requiring a sworn affidavit, the bill would expand the crime of perjury, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would require a local agency to extend the reasonable period of time described above by an additional 6 months upon a showing by the current owner of a good faith effort to correct or otherwise remedy the violation, and would authorize the agency to extend the reasonable period of time beyond that extension in its discretion, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/30/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Senate Enrollment
SB 1361 (Durazo) Transit-oriented housing developments: local governments: transit agencies and projects. (Enrolled 09/02/2026)
Existing law requires a housing development project to be an allowed use as a transit-oriented housing development if certain requirements are met. Existing law provides that these provisions do not apply to a local agency until July 1, 2026, unless the local agency takes specified actions.
Existing law defines various terms for these purposes. Existing law prohibits a local government from adopting any requirement that applies to a project solely or partially on the basis that the project is seeking approval as a transit-oriented housing development, as specified. This bill would additionally prohibit a local government with an existing or planned transit-oriented development stop from taking specified actions with respect to transit agencies and transit projects. (Based on 09/02/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Senate Enrollment
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 56 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 38 Public Safety and EMS
AB 762 (Irwin) Disposable, battery-embedded vapor inhalation device: prohibition and penalties. (Enrolled 08/30/2026)
Existing law regulates the manufacture, sale, and disposal of various single-use products, including single-use foodware accessories and condiments and single-use carryout bags. Existing law prohibits a store from, among other things, providing, distributing, or selling a carryout bag at the point of sale, except as specified. Existing law defines terms for these purposes. This bill would prohibit, beginning January 1, 2027, a person from importing or manufacturing for sale in this state a new or refurbished disposable, battery-embedded vapor inhalation device, and, beginning January 1, 2028, a person from selling, distributing, or offering for sale a new or refurbished disposable, battery-embedded vapor inhalation device in this state. The bill would define a “disposable, battery-embedded vapor inhalation device” to mean a vaporization device that contains a tobacco product, as defined, but not cannabis or a cannabis product, as defined, and that is not designed or intended to be reused, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/30/2026 text)
Location: 08/26/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 1753 (Stefani) Protective orders: firearms and ammunition: notice and procedures. (Enrolled 09/01/2026)
Existing law establishes procedures by which a person may petition the court for certain protective or restraining orders, including civil harassment restraining orders, domestic violence restraining orders, elder or dependent adult abuse restraining orders, gun violence restraining orders, postsecondary school restraining orders, and workplace violence restraining orders, to enjoin a restrained person from taking specified actions. Before a hearing on the issuance or denial of a domestic violence restraining order or gun violence restraining order, existing law requires the court to ensure that a search has been conducted to determine, among other things, if the subject of the proposed order owns or possesses a firearm as reflected in the Department of Justice Automated Firearms System. If after the search, the court finds that the subject of the proposed order owns or possesses a firearm, existing law requires the court to make a written record as to whether the subject has relinquished the firearm and provided proof of the required storage, sale, or relinquishment of the firearm. Upon a court’s issuance of such a protective order, existing law requires the restrained person to relinquish any firearm and ammunition in that person’s immediate possession or control, according to specified procedures. Existing law prescribes procedures by which the restrained person must certify compliance with the court, and for the court to determine, by a preponderance of the evidence, whether the person has a firearm in violation of the order. This bill would make clarifying and conforming changes to the procedures relating to the protective or restraining orders described above by explicitly requiring the restrained person to relinquish, in addition to any firearm, any ammunition in that person’s immediate possession or control. The bill, commencing January 1, 2028, would require courts to permit a party or witness to appear remotely at a hearing for a postsecondary educational institution or workplace violence restraining order at no cost. This bill would also require courts to develop rules and instructions for such remote appearances and to post them on their internet websites. The bill would also, commencing on January 1, 2028, require courts to allow filings related to those protective orders to be submitted electronically, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 09/01/2026 text) Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 57 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 39 Location: 08/27/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 1941 (González, Mark) Organized metal theft. (Enrolled 08/31/2026) Existing law makes a person who is a dealer in or collector of junk, metals, or secondhand materials, or their agent, employee, or representative, who buys or receives any wire, cable, copper, lead, solder, mercury, iron, or brass that the person knows or reasonably should know is used by or belongs to specified entities, including a railroad, certain utility companies, or a public entity engaged in furnishing public utility service, without using due diligence to ascertain that the person selling or delivering that material has a legal right to do so, guilty of criminally receiving that property and, in addition to imprisonment, makes that act punishable by a fine of not more than $5,000. This bill would prohibit organized metal theft, described as acting in concert with one or more persons to steal metal materials from one or more of specified materials and items with the intent to sell, exchange, or return those metal materials for value, acting in concert with 2 or more persons to receive, purchase, or possess those metal materials knowing or believing it to have been stolen, acting as an agent of another to steal those metal materials as part of an organized plan to commit theft, or recruiting, coordinating, organizing, supervising, directing, managing, or financing another to undertake acts of theft of metal. The bill would make a violation of organized metal theft punishable as either a misdemeanor or a felony. The bill would make related findings and declarations and state the intent of the Legislature. By creating new crimes, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/27/2026 text)
Location: 08/31/2026 - Assembly Enrolled
AB 2556 (Boerner) Evidence: credibility of witnesses and evidence affected or excluded by extrinsic policies. (Chaptered 06/30/2026)
Existing law sets forth the procedure by which, in any prosecution for rape or other specified sexual offenses, evidence of sexual conduct of the complaining witness may be offered to attack the credibility of the complaining witness. This procedure involves, among other things, the filing of a written motion by the defendant, accompanied by an affidavit filed under seal stating an offer of proof, and, if the court determines that the offer is sufficient, a hearing out of the presence of the jury regarding the offer of proof. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court may make an order stating what evidence may be introduced by the defendant. Under existing law, these procedures do not apply if the specified offenses are alleged to have occurred in a local detention facility or state prison, as defined. This bill would remove this exception, thereby also applying these procedures to specified offenses alleged to have occurred in a local detention facility or state prison. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 06/30/2026 text)
Location: 06/30/2026 - Assembly Chaptered
AB 2760 (Sharp-Collins) Law enforcement: wearable electroshock devices. (Enrollment 08/31/2026)
Existing law requires each law enforcement agency, on or before January 1, 2021, to maintain a policy that provides a minimum standard on the use of force. Existing law requires that the policy include, among other things, training standards and requirements relating to demonstrated knowledge and understanding of the law enforcement agency’s use of force policy by officers, Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 58 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 40 investigators, and supervisors. Existing law prohibits a law enforcement agency from authorizing the use of a carotid restraint or choke hold by any peace officer employed by that agency. This bill would, until January 1, 2030, prohibit a law enforcement agency, including a federal law enforcement agency, from using a wearable electroshock device within the State of California. The bill would also prohibit a law enforcement agency from using state funds to purchase a wearable electroshock device. The bill would require a law enforcement agency to update their use of force policies to prohibit the use of a wearable electroshock device. By increasing the duties on local law enforcement, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Division of Law Enforcement within the Department of Justice to conduct a study on the safety and community impacts of wearable electroshock devices and provide recommendations for appropriate standards and safeguards for their use, and would require the department to report to the Legislature on the findings and recommendations of the study on or before January 1, 2029.
This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/28/2026 text)
Location: 08/31/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
SB 239 (Arreguín) Crimes: criminal threats. (Enrolled 09/02/2026) Existing law makes it a crime to willfully threaten to commit a crime that will result in death or great bodily injury to another person, as specified. Under existing law, this crime is punishable as a misdemeanor or by imprisonment in state prison as a felony. Existing law, for the purposes of sentencing for a felony violation of these provisions, authorizes the court to consider, as a factor in aggravation, that the defendant willfully threatened to commit a crime that would result in the death or great bodily injury of a state constitutional officer, a Member of the Legislature, or a judge or court commissioner, as specified. This bill would additionally authorize the court to consider, as a factor in aggravation, that the defendant willfully threatened to commit a crime that would result in the death or great bodily injury of an elections official of a city, county, city and county, or public district, or an elected local agency official, as specified. (Based on 08/30/2026 text)
Location: 09/02/2026 - Senate Enrolled
Notes1:
3/18/25: DC tagged as support. 3/21/25: SG sent letter to the City for review. 4/4/25: EN received final letter, submitted to Senate Local Government and Senate Judiciary, and sent to delegation. 5/6/25: EN testified in support in Senate Judiciary. 5.15.25 CP sent to delegation 1/27/26: DA removed position and priority due to gut and amend.
SB 758 (Umberg) Public health: nitrous oxide. (Enrolled 09/02/2026) Existing law, the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003, requires a retailer, as defined, to hold a license from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration to engage in the sale of cigarettes or tobacco products. A violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill would expand those provisions to prohibit a retailer from selling nitrous oxide in any retail location, subject to certain exceptions. The bill would authorize a city or county or city and county to adopt an ordinance imposing greater restrictions on the retail sale of nitrous oxide provided the ordinance does not restrict legitimate uses, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/30/2026 text)
Location: 09/02/2026 - Senate Enrolled
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 59 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 41
Position: Support
Notes1:
4/14: City approved stance on bill. 4/16: SG and KB confirmed stance in weekly meeting. 4/17: KB sent City draft of the letter. 4/28: KB submitted letter to portal and delegation (Senate Appropriations Committee, Senate Judiciary Committee, Senate Public Safety Committee) 6/22:
KB submitted letter to portal. 6/23: KB testified in support at Asm Business and Professions.
SB 936 (Blakespear) Nitrous oxide: sales. (Enrolled 09/02/2026) Existing law makes it a misdemeanor to possess nitrous oxide with the intent of inhaling it for specified purposes, including to cause intoxication. Existing law also makes it a misdemeanor to sell nitrous oxide to any person under 18 years of age. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor to dispense nitrous oxide to a person and knowing that the person will use it for specified prohibited purposes, if that person then causes death or great bodily injury to themselves or another person.
This bill would, except as specifically exempted, prohibit the sale and distribution of a nitrous oxide container that is capable of holding more than 8 grams of nitrous oxide or from which an individual may directly inhale nitrous oxide. The bill would also prohibit the sale and distribution of a nitrous oxide that has, or is marketed as having, the taste or smell of any food. The bill would prohibit knowingly selling or distributing a device that allows an individual to inhale nitrous oxide from the container or hold nitrous oxide for the purposes of inhalation. The bill would punish a violation of these provisions as an infraction, as specified. The bill would also authorize a court to suspend a business license if the business has a prior conviction for violating these prohibitions, and to revoke a license to sell tobacco products if the business has 2 prior convictions for violating these prohibitions. The bill would make any person, distributor, or business found to have violated these prohibitions liable for all reasonable costs incurred by a public agency in the investigation, inspection, seizure, storage, transportation, handling, venting, abatement, disposal, or destruction of nitrous oxide products, nitrous oxide containers, inhalation devices, or related materials involved in the violation, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/30/2026 text)
Location: 09/02/2026 - Senate Enrolled
Position: Support
Notes1:
5/12/26: KB added support after City's leg committee meeting approval. 5/15/26: KB shared draft letter with the client. 5/29/26: KB submitted letter to portal and delegation. 6/9/26: KB resubmitted letter to portal. 6/16/26: SG testified in support in Assembly Business and Professions. 6/30/26: DH provided a me too in support in Assembly Public Safety.
SB 1203 (Smallwood-Cuevas) Security services. (Enrollment 08/31/2026) Existing law, the Proprietary Security Services Act, prohibits a person from engaging in the business of a proprietary private security officer or a proprietary private security employer unless registered with the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law makes a violation of these provisions an infraction, as specified. Existing law requires a person who is registered and hired as a proprietary private security officer to complete training in security officer skills within 6 months from the date Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 60 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 42 upon which registration is issued, or within 6 months of their employment with a proprietary private security employer, as specified. Existing law prohibits a proprietary private security employer from engaging in specified acts and authorizes the Director of Consumer Affairs to issue a citation, which may include an order to pay specified administrative fines for a violation of these provisions.
This bill, commencing January 1, 2029, would recast those training provisions to require the training to be 42 hours, to require an applicant for a proprietary private security officer registration to complete, within the first 6 months of their employment date, a course in the exercise of the power to arrest and the appropriate use of force as a condition of issuance of the registration, and to require that the training be conducted through traditional classroom instruction, as defined. The bill would require 2 hours of training to be dedicated to training employees on specified workers’ rights contained in a notice employers are required to provide employees, as specified. The bill would require the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services to administer certain provisions governing the approval of training providers, and would create a certificate authorizing a labor organization that represents security guards of a proprietary private security employer to provide the 2-hour training, as specified. The bill would also require a registered proprietary private security employee annually to complete a minimum of 12 hours of security officer skills training, with at least 4 hours of training dedicated to practicing deescalation skills, as specified, and that the time spent attending the annual training be compensated by the employer. The bill would require the bureau to determine the criteria to evaluate whether the deescalation trainings conform to the required principles and methods, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/28/2026 text)
Location: 09/01/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Revenue and Taxation
SB 423 (Gonzalez) California Public Records Act: private detention facilities. (Enrollment 08/31/2026)
Existing law, the California Public Records Act, requires each state or local agency, upon a request for a copy of records that reasonably describes an identifiable record or records, to make the records promptly available to any person upon payment of fees covering direct costs of duplication, or a statutory fee if applicable, except with respect to public records exempt from disclosure by express provisions of law. Existing law requires, upon request, an exact copy to be provided unless it is impracticable to do so. This bill would specify that a recording of a call or a written communication that is maintained by a state or local agency that reports or describes an incident, as defined, occurring at a private detention facility, and specified records relating to that call or communication in the possession of a law enforcement agency, are not confidential, and would require an agency to disclose those records upon request to any member of the public. By requiring agencies to disclose certain records to the public, the bill would increase the duties of local officials and create a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/20/2026 text)
Location: 08/31/2026 - Senate Enrollment
Transportation and Public Works
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 61 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 43 AB 1421 (Wilson) Vehicles: Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee. (Amended 01/05/2026)
Existing law requires the Chair of the California Transportation Commission to create a Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation to guide the development and evaluation of a pilot program assessing the potential for mileage-based revenue collection as an alternative to the gas tax system. Existing law additionally requires the Transportation Agency, in consultation with the commission, to implement the pilot program, as specified. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2027. This bill would require the commission, in consultation with the Transportation Agency, to consolidate and prepare research and recommendations related to a road user charge or a mileage-based fee system. The bill would require the commission to submit a report, as specified, on the research and recommendations described above to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature by no later than January 1, 2027. The bill would require the commission to consult with appropriate state agencies and other stakeholders, as specified, in preparing the research and recommendations and report described above. (Based on 01/05/2026 text)
Location: 01/29/2026 - Senate Rules
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 62 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 44 AB 1569 (Davies) Pupil safety: electric bicycle: safety and training program. (Chaptered 08/27/2026)
Existing law establishes the State Department of Education in state government, and vests the department with specified powers and duties relating to the state’s public school system. Existing law establishes the Department of the California Highway Patrol, under the control of the Commissioner of the California Highway Patrol, within the Transportation Agency. Existing law requires the Department of the California Highway Patrol to develop statewide safety and training programs based on evidence-based practices for users of electric bicycles. This bill would require, on or before March 1, 2028, the State Department of Education, in consultation with the Department of the California Highway Patrol, to develop a standardized electric bicycle safety and training program for pupils in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, as provided. In developing the program, the bill would authorize the State Department of Education and the Department of the California Highway Patrol to collaborate with local law enforcement agencies or local governments that have implemented electric bicycle training programs already to ensure the program reflects proven best practices. The bill would encourage local educational agencies and parent organizations to offer training demonstrations to pupils and parents on electric bicycle operations in collaboration with local law enforcement agencies or local governments, as specified. (Based on 08/27/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Assembly Chaptered
Position: Support
Notes1:
2/19/26: Bill introduced; EN tagged as support. 2/24/26: EN sent draft support letter to City for review. EN received final letter and sent to delegation and author's office. Bill not yet referred to a committee. 3/10/26: DA submitted support letter to portal and delegation. 4/8/26: CS attended Asm. Education Committee - bill on consent. 4/17/26: KB sent draft letter to City for review. 5/11/26: KB followed up with the City on draft letter. 5/28/26: KB submitted letter to portal. 6/12/26:
KB submitted letter to portal.
AB 1614 (Dixon) Vehicles: bicycles. (Chaptered 06/30/2026) Existing law, the California Bicycle Transportation Act, establishes 4 classifications of facilities, referred to as bikeways, that provide primarily for, and promote, bicycle travel. Existing law requires a person operating a bicycle, which includes an electric bicycle, upon a highway to ride the bicycle upon or astride a permanent and regular seat unless the bicycle was designed by the manufacturer to be ridden without a seat. Existing law requires a person riding as a passenger on a bicycle upon a highway to be upon or astride a seat attached to the bicycle, as specified. A violation of these provisions in punishable as an infraction. This bill would make those provisions applicable to the operation of a bicycle upon a Class I bikeway. By expanding an existing infraction, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 06/30/2026 text)
Location: 06/30/2026 - Assembly Chaptered
Position: Support
Notes1:
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 63 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 45 2/10/26: EN tagged as support. 2/13/26: EN sent draft support letter to the City for review. 2/24/26:
EN followed up on draft letter. 2/27/26: DA submitted letter to portal and delegation. 4/6/26: EN testified in support in Assembly Transportation. 5/21/26: CPPG resubmitted letter to portal. 6/11/26: KB submitted letter to portal.
AB 1976 (Wicks) Streets and highways: pedestrian and bicycle facilities. (Enrollment 08/31/2026)
Existing law grants the legislative body of a city certain powers with respect to city streets and highways, including the power to construct and maintain those streets and highways. Existing law grants the board of supervisors of a county general supervision, management, and control of county highways and authorizes the board of supervisors to lay out, construct, improve, and maintain county highways. This bill would prohibit a city or county from holding a community input meeting to reconsider, delay, or prevent implementation of a proposed pedestrian or bicycle safety project after that project has passed 90% design, as specified. After or upon the award of a contract for, or when county or city staff, as applicable, are directed to begin, the construction of a pedestrian or bicycle safety project, the bill would prohibit the city or county from terminating the project unless the city or county makes at least one specified finding at a public meeting. If a city or county establishes a process for residents of the city or county to submit a petition to request the installation of a traffic-calming measure, the bill would prohibit the city or county from requiring the petition to contain the signatures of more than a majority of the total number of persons whose residences are located, in whole or in part, within 1,000 feet of the proposed traffic-calming measure, as specified. To the extent that the bill increases the duties of local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/21/2026 text)
Location: 08/31/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 2059 (Wilson) California Environmental Quality Act: transportation impacts: vehicle miles traveled: mitigation. (Enrollment 08/31/2026)
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA requires the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation to prepare, develop, and transmit to the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency for certification and adoption proposed revisions to the CEQA implementation guidelines to establish criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts of projects within transit priority areas, and requires the criteria to promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses. CEQA requires the office to recommend potential metrics, including, among other metrics, vehicle miles traveled, to measure these transportation impacts. This bill would require the Department of Transportation, in consultation with specified entities, to, on or before December 31, 2030, develop guidance on vehicle-miles- travel mitigation measures for transportation projects in nonmetropolitan counties, as provided.
The bill would require the department to publish the guidance on its internet website and add the Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 64 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 46 guidance as an addendum to the Transportation Analysis Framework and the Transportation Analysis under CEQA. The bill would specify that a transportation project for which the lead agency has issued a notice of preparation for the project’s environmental impact report on or before December 31, 2031 is presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact as determined by the vehicle-miles-traveled metric if at least 70% of the project lies within one or more nonmetropolitan counties. Because the bill would impose additional duties on a lead agency in its analysis of significant transportation impacts, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/25/2026 text)
Location: 08/31/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
AB 2346 (Wilson) Vehicles: electric bicycles and speed limits. (Enrolled 08/25/2026) Existing law defines an electric bicycle as a bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor of less than 750 watts, and classifies electric bicycles into 3 classes with different restrictions for various purposes. This bill would require all class 2 electric bicycles manufactured, sold, or offered for sale on or after January 1, 2029, to be equipped with a speedometer. The bill would also require all electric bicycles manufactured, sold, or offered for sale on or after January 1, 2029, to be equipped with an integrated or detachable front lamp and a rear lamp, as specified. The bill would also require sellers and distributors of electric bicycles to disclose specified information at or before the point of sale, including, among other things, the classification and maximum speed of the electric bicycle and a recommendation that persons under 16 years of age should not ride an electric bicycle at a speed greater than 15 miles per hour. The bill would make a violation of these provisions punishable as an infraction, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/21/2026 text)
Location: 08/25/2026 - Assembly Enrolled
Position: Support
Notes1:
3/22/26: SG sent draft support letter to the City for review. 3/26/26: KB added support. Still awaiting letter. 04/01/26: KB submitted letter of support to delegation and Asm transportation committee.
AB 2453 (Rodriguez, Michelle) Vehicles: off-highway motor vehicles. (Enrolled 08/20/2026) Existing law regulates the operation of recreational off-highway motor vehicles on lands, other than a highway, that are open and accessible to the public. Existing law generally prohibits a motor vehicle from being driven upon a highway unless it is registered. However, existing law authorizes off-highway motor vehicles that are issued identification plates or devices to cross highways in certain situations, including, among others, a peace officer operating an off-highway motor vehicle in an emergency response situation. This bill would expand the above-described provision to additionally authorize first responders, as defined, to operate off-highway motor vehicles in an emergency response situation. The bill would also authorize peace officers and first responders to operate off-highway motor vehicles upon a highway, at a distance not to exceed 5 miles, for the purpose of accessing off-highway recreational areas or locations of patrol, within jurisdictions that have adopted a policy or plan for the operation of those off-highway motor vehicles pursuant to the provisions described below. The bill would require peace officers and first responders operating Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 65 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 47 off-highway motor vehicles pursuant to these provisions to comply with the terms and requirements of the policy or plan adopted by the applicable local authority. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/17/2026 text)
Location: 08/20/2026 - Assembly Enrolled
Position: Sponsor
Notes1:
4/6/26: AB 1909 folded into AB 2453. SG sent draft co-sponsor letter to the City for review. EN tagged as sponsor. 4/7/26: AB 2453 on consent in Assembly Transportation 4/13/26: KB submitted sponsor letter to delegation and portal (Assembly Appropriations Committee, Assembly Transportation Committee) 6/1/26: KB submitted sponsor letter to portal. 8/27/26: Emailed to the Governor's Leg Unit.
AB 2595 (Papan) San Mateo Electric Bicycle Safety Pilot Program. (Enrolled 08/25/2026) Existing law defines an electric bicycle and classifies electric bicycles into 3 classes with different restrictions. Under existing law, a “class 1 electric bicycle” is a bicycle equipped with a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling and ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle reaches the speed of 20 miles per hour. Under existing law, a “class 2 electric bicycle” is a bicycle equipped with a motor that may be used exclusively to propel the bicycle and is not capable of providing assistance when the bicycle reaches the speed of 20 miles per hour. Under existing law, a “class 3 electric bicycle” is a bicycle equipped with a speedometer and a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling, and that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle reaches the speed of 28 miles per hour. Existing law prohibits a person under 16 years of age from operating a class 3 electric bicycle. This bill, the San Mateo Electric Bicycle Safety Pilot Program, would, until January 1, 2031, authorize a local authority within the County of San Mateo, or the County of San Mateo in unincorporated areas, to adopt an ordinance or resolution that would prohibit a person under 12 years of age from operating a class 1 or 2 electric bicycle. For the first 60 days following the adoption of an ordinance or resolution for this purpose, the bill would make a violation of the ordinance or resolution punishable by a warning notice. After 60 days, the bill would make a violation of the ordinance or resolution punishable by a fine of $25, except as specified. This bill would make a parent or legal guardian with control or custody of an unemancipated minor who violates the ordinance or resolution jointly and severally liable with the minor for the amount of the fine imposed. The bill would, if an ordinance or resolution is adopted, require the county to, by January 1, 2030, submit a report to the Legislature that includes, among other things, the total number of traffic stops initiated for a violation of the ordinance or resolution, the results of those traffic stops, and the actions taken by a peace officer during a traffic stop, as specified. The bill would require a local authority or county to administer a public information campaign for at least 30 calendar days prior to the enactment of the ordinance or resolution, as specified. (Based on 08/21/2026 text)
Location: 08/25/2026 - Assembly Enrolled
SB 909 (Smallwood-Cuevas) Public works. (Enrolled 08/31/2026) Existing law requires that, except as specified, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages be paid to workers employed on public works and imposes misdemeanor penalties for a Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 66 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 48 willful violation of this requirement. Existing law defines “public works” for the purposes of regulating public contracts as, among other things, construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work done under contract and paid for, in whole or in part, out of public funds.
Existing law generally requires a contractor or subcontractor to be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, or engage in the performance of any public work contract. Existing law requires a contractor or subcontractor to meet specific conditions to qualify for this registration, including that a contractor or subcontractor pay an initial application fee and an annual renewal fee set by the Director of Industrial Relations.
Existing law authorizes the department to establish and adjust annual registration and renewal fees up to $800 by publishing the fees on the department’s internet website. This bill would increase the fee limit to $1,000. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/28/2026 text)
Location: 08/31/2026 - Senate Enrolled
SB 922 (Laird) Vehicles: local agency charges: use of streets or highways. (Chaptered 08/27/2026)
Existing law prohibits a local agency from imposing a tax, permit fee, or other charge for the privilege of using its streets or highways, other than a permit fee for an extralegal load unless the local agency had imposed the fee prior to June 1, 1989. This bill would explicitly state that a fee, charge, surcharge, or component thereof imposed upon the provider of, or ratepayer for, public services by or for a local agency to recover the cost of street maintenance and repair and other costs associated with the use of its streets, roads, or highways to provide those public services is not a tax, permit fee, or other charge that is prohibited by the provision described above. The bill would provide that nothing in the Vehicle Code prohibits a local agency from imposing or collecting this fee, charge, or surcharge. The bill would delete obsolete references and make other technical changes. The bill would make various findings and declarations. (Based on 08/27/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Senate Chaptered
Notes1:
Cal Cities sponsored bill.
SB 1087 (Cabaldon) Transportation planning: sustainable communities strategies:
transportation funding programs. (Enrollment 08/31/2026) Existing law requires certain transportation planning agencies to prepare and adopt regional transportation plans directed at achieving a coordinated and balanced regional transportation system. Existing law requires a regional transportation plan to include a policy element, a sustainable communities strategy prepared by a metropolitan planning organization, an action element, and a financial element, as provided. Existing law requires those transportation planning agencies to adopt and submit every 4 years, except as provided, an updated regional transportation plan to the California Transportation Commission and the Department of Transportation. This bill would revise and recast the requirements for a sustainable communities strategy, including, among other things, (A) requiring a sustainable communities strategy every 8 years with a progress report after 4 years instead of requiring a sustainable communities strategy every 4 years, (B) requiring the state board to provide each region with greenhouse gas emission reduction targets for 2035 and 2045, and (C) requiring the state board to hold technical workshops Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 67 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 49 before providing those targets. The bill would also revise the state board’s process for reviewing sustainable communities strategies and alternative planning strategies, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/21/2026 text)
Location: 08/31/2026 - Senate Enrollment
SB 1167 (Blakespear) Vehicles: electric bicycles. (Enrolled 08/31/2026) Existing law defines an electric bicycle as a bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor that does not exceed 750 watts of power. Existing law classifies electric bicycles into 3 classes with different restrictions for various purposes, and requires, among other things, a class 3 electric bicycle to be equipped with a speedometer. Existing law prohibits certain vehicles that do not meet the definition of an electric bicycle from being advertised, sold, offered for sale, or labeled as an electric bicycle, as specified. A violation of the Vehicle Code is a crime. This bill would amend the type of vehicles that are prohibited from being advertised, sold, offered for sale, or labeled as electric bicycles, including, among others, motor-driven cycles and mopeds. By expanding the application of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/31/2026 text)
Location: 08/28/2026 - Senate Enrollment
Position: Support
Notes1:
3/22/26: SG sent draft support letter to the City for review. 3/26/26: KB added support. Still awaiting letter. 04/01/26: KB submitted letter of support to delegation and Sen Transportation Committee. 04/07/26: KR testified at Senate Transportation Committee. 4/16/26: KB submitted letter of support to portal. (Senate Transportation Committee, Senate Appropriations Committee, and Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee) 6/23/26: KB submitted letter to portal. 6/30/26: SG testified in support in Assembly Transportation
SB 1324 (Blakespear) Passenger and freight rail: LOSSAN Rail Corridor: working group report. (Chaptered 08/27/2026)
Existing law establishes the Department of Transportation in the Transportation Agency. Existing law authorizes the department, subject to approval of the Secretary of Transportation, to enter into an interagency transfer agreement under which a joint powers board assumes responsibility for administering state-funded intercity rail service in certain rail corridors, including the LOSSAN Rail Corridor. Existing law defines the LOSSAN Rail Corridor as the intercity passenger rail corridor between San Diego, Los Angeles, and San Luis Obispo. Pursuant to this authority, the department entered into an interagency transfer agreement with the LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency to administer intercity passenger rail service in the LOSSAN Rail Corridor. Existing law requires the Secretary of Transportation to convene a working group composed of representatives of certain types of entities, including, among others, representatives from county transportation commissions and metropolitan planning organizations from specified counties. Existing law requires the working group to submit consensus recommendations and feedback in a report to the Legislature on or before February 1, 2026, on various topics relating to rail service in the LOSSAN Rail Corridor. This bill would instead require the working group to submit this report to the Legislature on or before February 1, 2027. By extending the duties of representatives of local Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 68 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 50 agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other existing laws. (Based on 08/27/2026 text)
Location: 08/27/2026 - Senate Chaptered
Water and Wastewater
AB 2180 (Ward) Local government: Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act: proportional cost of service. (Enrolled 08/25/2026)
The California Constitution specifies various requirements with respect to the levying of assessments and property-related fees and charges by a local agency. As part of those requirements, the California Constitution mandates that such fees or charges that are extended, imposed, or increased satisfy certain requirements, including, but not limited to, that the amount of the fee or charge imposed upon any parcel or person as an incident of property ownership not exceed the proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel. Existing law, known as the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (act), prescribes specific procedures and parameters for local jurisdictions to comply with these requirements and, among other things, authorizes an agency providing water, wastewater, sewer, or refuse collection services to adopt a schedule of fees or charges authorizing automatic adjustments that pass through increases in wholesale charges for water, sewage treatment, or wastewater treatment or adjustments for inflation under certain circumstances. This bill would authorize a local government to demonstrate the proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel by any method that reasonably allocates the ascertainable cost of providing service to all parcels, if substantiated as provided.
The bill would, however, provide that for water or sewer service fee or charge impositions, a local government is not required to provide an exact measure of the cost of the service at each parcel and may instead impose uniform or tiered rates to parcel or customer classes that are defined based on common characteristics indicative of likely water or sewer use. The bill would provide that the proportional cost of service within each tier of water service may be substantiated by using any reasonable basis for allocating costs attributed to the tier, as described, and would provide a local government discretion to determine the costs allocated to each tier as long as the rate for each tier does not exceed the proportional cost of service reasonably allocated to parcels subject to that tier. The bill would specify that its provisions do not apply to fees for water connections or sewer connections, or capacity charges, as specified. (Based on 08/21/2026 text)
Location: 08/25/2026 - Assembly Enrolled
AB 2469 (Papan) Data centers: water use disclosures. (Enrollment 08/31/2026) The Planning and Zoning Law authorizes the legislative body of any county or city to adopt ordinances that, among other things, regulate the use of buildings, structures, and land as between industry, businesses, residences, and open space, as specified. This bill would prohibit a city, county, or city and county from approving a discretionary or ministerial permit or other entitlement that would result in the construction, or an expansion that increases the maximum peak water use, of a data center unless specified conditions are satisfied, including, among others, that the applicant provides the city, county, or city and a county prescribed information. The bill would include in this prescribed information a water scarcity plan and a water supply assessment, each as provided. The bill would also include in the specified conditions that the applicant assumes Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 69 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 51 responsibility for the full cost of any required water conveyance, treatment or storage, or distribution infrastructure improvements necessary to serve the project, as determined by the applicable water supplier. The bill would provide that this provision is severable. By expanding the duties of local agencies to administer these provisions, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/27/2026 text)
Location: 09/01/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
SB 958 (Weber Pierson) California Environmental Quality Act: environmental impacts: building height. (Enrolled 09/01/2026)
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. This bill would, for purposes of CEQA, prohibit the environmental impacts that are associated with increased building height alone from being considered significant impacts on the environment, if a project meets specified conditions, as provided. Because a lead agency would be required to determine if a project meets the specified conditions, the bill would impose a state- mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 09/01/2026 text)
Location: 08/30/2026 - Senate Enrollment
SB 1085 (Durazo) Water supply planning: housing developments. (Enrolled 08/30/2026) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to be responsible for determining whether a project is exempt from CEQA and whether an environmental impact report, a negative declaration, or a mitigated negative declaration is required. Existing law requires a city or county that determines a certain type of project is subject to the requirements of CEQA to identify any public water system that may supply water for the project and to request those public water systems to prepare a specified water supply assessment, as provided. This bill, among other things, would instead require a city or county, upon receipt of a preliminary application for a housing development project that meets certain conditions, or upon a development application for certain projects being determined as complete or deemed complete, to make that identification of public water systems. The bill would require a city or county, within 15 days of receiving an application that meets either of the above-mentioned criteria, to request each identified public water system to determine whether the projected water demand associated with the proposed project was included in the most recently adopted urban water management plan. By imposing additional duties on a city or county, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/30/2026 text)
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 70 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 52 Location: 08/27/2026 - Senate Enrollment
Position: Watch
Notes1:
6/9/26: City Council approved oppose position. 6/30/26: KB followed up with the City on the draft letter. 7/2/26: Position under review.
Wildfire
AB 1642 (Harabedian) Wildfires: contamination standards. (Enrollment 08/31/2026) Existing law establishes the Department of Toxic Substances Control, which regulates the handling and management of hazardous waste and hazardous materials, and establishes the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the State Air Resources Board. Existing federal law sets action levels for lead in dust and emission standards for asbestos, and existing state law sets workplace standards for asbestos. Existing law authorizes local health officers to take specified actions to protect public health and establishes procedures for the remediation of certain contaminated properties. This bill would require the Department of Toxic Substances Control, in consultation with the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and other relevant coordinating agencies, on or before December 31, 2028, to develop and adopt regulations pertaining to lead and asbestos testing, remediation, and restoration after a wildfire and, on or before December 31, 2029, to develop and publish guidance pertaining to specified other contaminants, as provided. The bill would require the State Air Resources Board, on or before December 31, 2028, to develop and publish guidance on indoor air contaminants following residential smoke damage from a wildfire, as provided. The bill would provide that, until the adoption of the regulations and guidance, specified lead and asbestos standards shall apply for wildfire-caused lead and asbestos remediation, as provided. The bill would require the department, in collaboration with the State Department of Education and other relevant state agencies, no later than July 1, 2028, to develop advisory, nonregulatory guidance for schools after a wildfire, as provided. The bill would exempt the regulations and guidance from the Administrative Procedure Act. The bill would become operative only if AB 1795 of the 2025–26 Regular Session is enacted and takes effect on or before January 1, 2027. (Based on 08/28/2026 text)
Location: 08/31/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
SB 1370 (Stern) Covered wildfire mitigation projects: consolidated and expedited review. (Enrollment 08/31/2026)
Existing law establishes in the Natural Resources Agency the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, which is known as and may be referred to as CAL-FIRE. Existing law establishes in CAL- FIRE the Office of the State Fire Marshal and requires that office to establish the Community Wildfire Mitigation Assistance Program to coordinate regional and local efforts with state policies, strategies, and programs for community wildfire mitigation in order to improve wildfire preparedness and prevention, with an emphasis on the most vulnerable communities. This bill would require that, notwithstanding any other law, any state-level environmental and resource permits, approvals, consultations, and reviews required for a covered wildfire mitigation project, as defined, be consolidated into a single coordinated review by a project review team, as defined, and Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 71 of 92
1127 11TH STREET, SUITE 300, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • 916.974.9270 • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP.COM PAGE 53 administered jointly by the consolidated review agencies, defined as the Natural Resources Agency in coordination with the California Environmental Protection Agency. The bill would require an applicant seeking authorization to undertake a covered wildfire mitigation project to submit a single, consolidated application package to the consolidated review agencies. The bill would require a decision to be rendered by the consolidated review agencies within 60 calendar days of the consolidated review agencies deeming an application is complete, as provided, and would authorize the applicant and the consolidated review agencies to agree to extend the 60-day timeline if both parties agree to the extension. The bill would require the approvals to be in writing and to include specified information, including, among other things, a description of the project and a list of permits, agreements, consultations, or approvals waived by the review agencies’ authorization. This bill would further provide for an expedited authorization, as defined, issued pursuant to these requirements, which would waive the requirement that the covered wildfire mitigation project comply with statutes, rules, regulations, and requirements, within the jurisdiction of boards, departments, commissions, offices, and agencies within the consolidated review agencies, except as provided. The expedited authorization would replace any other permit, agreement, or authorization required by state statutes, rules, regulations, and requirements that falls within the jurisdiction of boards, departments, commissions, offices, and agencies within the consolidated review agencies. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. (Based on 08/28/2026 text)
Location: 09/01/2026 - Assembly Enrollment
Notes1:
Supported by Cal Cities.
Total Measures: 95
Total Tracking Forms: 95
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 72 of 92
Exhibit 4
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 73 of 92
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 74 of 92
California Insurance Pool Authority
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 75 of 92
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 76 of 92
Date: August 10, 2026
To: Members, California State Legislature
Urgent Need for Comprehensive Tort Reform to Protect California Taxpayers, Survivors, and Essential Public Services
On behalf of the undersigned organizations, we urge the Legislature to enact meaningful tort reform for civil actions against public entities. New data released by the California Association of Joint Powers Authorities (CAJPA) confirms what our members have been warning lawmakers about for years: public-entity liability costs have tripled in the last seven years, now exceeding $7 billion in known exposure. Costs are on pace to grow another 70 percent by 2027–28. The fiscal trajectory is unsustainable, the structure of liability is fundamentally unfair to taxpayers, and the consequences are now measured in billions of dollars diverted away from classrooms, fire stations, roads, mental health services, and the essential programs Californians depend on every day.
Our organizations share a deep and unwavering commitment to ensuring that survivors of harm receive justice, support, and meaningful compensation. California’s public agencies are not asking for insulation from accountability. We do not seek to deny survivors their day in court. Instead, we seek to fix a system that, as currently structured, transfers enormous wealth to plaintiffs’ law firms and threatens the financial solvency of the very public agencies tasked with protecting and serving our vulnerable community members. The longer the Legislature waits, the more public services will be cut, the more agencies will face insolvency.
The Path Forward. We urge the Legislature to advance a comprehensive tort reform package for civil actions against public entities that, at minimum, includes the following:
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 77 of 92
• Defined benefits, including caps on damages in civil actions against public entities, ensuring survivors and other injured parties are made whole while preserving the capacity to deliver essential public services.
• Proportional (several) liability for economic damages in civil actions against public entities, so that taxpayers pay only for the share of harm actually attributable to the public agency. This way the perpetrators bear the cost of their own conduct and not taxpayers.
• Heightened evidentiary and procedural standards for claims where witnesses, records, and evidence archives are absent or insufficient to assign culpability.
Why are Billions of Taxpayer Dollars Being Diverted from Essential Services? AB 218 (Gonzalez, Chapter 861, Statutes of 2019) related to childhood sexual assault is one stark driver, but it is not the only one. Across the spectrum of civil litigation against public entities — from premises liability to dangerous conditions — plaintiffs’ firms are increasingly targeting governmental defendants precisely because they are perceived as having the deepest pockets. The result is an unreasonable transfer of public resources to private wealth that the Legislature has both the power and the responsibility to address
How Are Claims Against Public Entities Funded? Most cities, counties, special districts, and school districts in California do not purchase liability coverage from traditional commercial insurance carriers because it is either too expensive, does not provide sufficient coverage, or is simply not offered. Instead, they self-fund their liability coverage or they collectively pool risk through Joint Powers Authorities (JPAs), which are not insurance companies with large capital reserves. Every self-funded claim, including those paid out of a JPA, comes from taxpayer-funded member contributions paid by cities, counties, schools, and other public agencies from the same general fund dollars that pay for police officers, firefighters, teachers, road crews, and homelessness response.
When a JPA pays out claims of magnitude, every member agency in that pool feels it through higher premiums, the potential need for special assessments, reduced coverage limits, and/or increasingly, the inability to obtain coverage at all. Public agencies that have never had a single AB 218 claim filed against them are facing double-digit premium increases. For schools, this means Proposition 98 education dollars intended to support today’s students are paying for decades-old liabilities. Even for cities and counties that have few claims filed against them it means delaying critical infrastructure maintenance and reducing local government’s ability to provide social-safety-net services to the most vulnerable Californians.
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Are on Track to Profit Over Half a Billion Taxpayer Dollars Every Year. In civil actions against public entities, plaintiffs’ counsel commonly recover contingency fees of 40 percent or more of the gross judgment or settlement. Even using a conservative 30 percent contingency assumption, estimated plaintiff attorney fees Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 78 of 92
in actions against California public entities have climbed to over $500 million annually. In many individual cases, attorney fees approach 50 percent of the taxpayer-funded settlement or award. That means that for every $10 million paid by a city, county, JPA, or school district, as much as $4 to $5 million is paid to a private law firm. It does not go to the survivor, nor does it go to mental health services, prevention or victim assistance, or back to the taxpayers who funded the payment. Plaintiffs’ firms are, in many cases, the single largest beneficiaries of the current system.
Caps on Damages Are Essential to Preserve Public Services and Solvency.
Support for meaningful tort reform must include caps on damages in actions against public entities. Without such caps, the cascading effects of recent legislation will only worsen, and the very real threat of insolvency among California’s public agencies, already materializing in some regions, will only accelerate. California already imposes reasonable limits in medical malpractice cases under MICRA, recognizing the public interest in such restrictions. The same principle should apply when taxpayer dollars are the source of the payment.
Public Entities Should Pay in Proportion to Their Actual Fault — Not for the Crimes of Others. Under California’s current liability structure, a public entity found just one percent at fault can be ordered to pay the entirety of a plaintiff’s economic damages — even when the overwhelming majority of fault lies with a criminal actor who has no assets to satisfy a judgment.
The result is morally indefensible: perpetrators escape financial accountability for their conduct, while taxpayers — through their cities, counties, transit agencies, and school districts — are forced to pay for the harm that resulted. It allows perpetrators to walk away while public services are gutted to satisfy awards for conduct the public entity did not commit. The Legislature must restore proportional (several) liability for economic damages in actions against public entities, so that they are responsible only for the share of harm attributable to the public agency’s own conduct.
Survivors Deserve Their Day in Court, and Public Entities Deserve a Meaningful Opportunity to Defend. Restoring balance to AB 218 claims involving decades-old conduct does not require closing the courthouse door to survivors. Rather, it requires recognizing that, after decades have passed, the records and witnesses needed to fairly adjudicate a claim are often incomplete or simply gone. For claims involving conduct that occurred decades ago, we urge the Legislature to restore balance by reinstating a prior-knowledge requirement, paired with a clear-and-convincing-evidence standard.
Prior to AB 218, California law permitted survivors to bring claims against public entities outside the statute of limitations, when a plaintiff could show the entity "knew or had reason to know, or was otherwise on notice, of any unlawful sexual conduct" by the perpetrator and failed to implement reasonable safeguards. That framework provided a meaningful path to justice for survivors with evidence of institutional culpability while also protecting taxpayers from liability for conduct the public entity had no realistic means to anticipate, prevent, or now defend against.
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 79 of 92
Our coalition stands ready to work with the Legislature, the Administration, and the survivor community to craft a balanced, durable solution so that necessary action can be taken now. Detailed findings and supporting data are available in CAJPA’s recent report, Protecting Public Funds: The Rising Cost of Claims Against California Public Entities. Please do not hesitate to contact us with questions or to discuss specific legislative vehicles.
Sincerely,
California Association of Joint Powers Authorities (CAJPA) California School Boards Association (CSBA)
California Association of School Business Officials (CASBO) Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD)
Association of California School Administrators (ACSA)
The Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC)
California Association of Recreation and Park Districts (CARPD) California Special Districts Association (CSDA)
League of California Cities
Los Angeles City Attorney's Office
North Bay Schools Insurance Authority (NBSIA)
California Association of Suburban School Districts
California Latino School Boards Association
California LULAC (League of United Latin American Citizens) ABC Unified School District
Alameda County Schools Insurance Group
Anderson Valley Unified School District
Beta Healthcare Group
Bennett Valley Union School District
Brett Harte Union High School District
Buckeye Union School District
Butte Schools Self-Funded Programs
Cajon Valley Union School District
California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities (CARMA) California Insurance Pool Authority
California Intergovernmental Risk Authority (CIRA)
California Joint Powers Risk Management Authority (CJPRMA) Camino Union Elementary School District
Canyon Elementary School District
Central Fire District, Santa Cruz County
Central Region School Insurance Group
Central San Joaquin Valley Risk Management Authority (CSJVRMA) City of Arcadia
City of Artesia
City of Avalon
City of Bakersfield
City of Bellflower
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 80 of 92
City of Blythe
City of Calimesa
City of Canyon Lake
City of Capitola
City of Carlsbad
City of Carson
City of Chico
City of Citrus Heights
City of Cloverdale
City of Coalinga
City of Colton
City of Corona
City of Cotati
City of Downey
City of Duarte
City of Dunsmuir
City of Eastvale
City of El Segundo
City of Elk Grove
City of Eureka
City of Fairfield
City of Folsom
City of Fort Bragg
City of Glendale
City of Glendora
City of Grass Valley
City of Hanford
City of Hemet
City of Highland
City of Industry
City of Irwindale
City of Jurupa Valley
City of La Mesa
City of La Mirada
City of La Puente
City of Lake Elsinore
City of Lake Port
City of Lindsay
City of Live Oak
City of Long Beach
City of Madera
City of Marysville
City of Menifee
City of Merced
City of Monrovia
City of Montclair
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 81 of 92
City of Moreno Valley
City of Mt. Shasta
City of Murrieta
City of National City
City of Norco
City of Oakdale
City of Oroville
City of Pacific Grove
City of Palm Desert
City of Paramount
City of Pasadena
City of Perris
City of Petaluma
City of Pico Rivera
City of Placerville
City of Rancho Cordova
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City of Reedley
City of Rio Dell
City of Ripon
City of Riverside
City of Roseville
City of Sacramento
City of Shasta Lake
City of Sunnyvale
City of South Gate
City of St. Helena
City of Stanton
City of Sutter Creek
City of Tehama
City of Tracy
City of Tustin
City of Upland
City of Vacaville
City of Vernon
City of Victorville
City of Walnut Creek
City of Weed
City of Whittier
City of Willows
City of Yorba Linda
City of Yreka
Corona Norco Unified School District
County of Alpine
County of Butte
County of Humboldt
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 82 of 92
County of Inyo
County of Kern
County of Kings
County of Lassen
County of Merced
County of Mono
County of Riverside
County of San Bernardino
County of Siskiyou
County of Solano
County of Tehama
County of Trinity
County of Yuba
Desert Sands Unified School District
Dunham Elementary School
East Bay Schools Insurance Group (EBSIG)
East Side Union High School District
El Dorado County Office of Education (EDCOE)
Employment Risk Management Authority (ERMA)
Folsom Cordova Unified School District
Galt Joint Union Elementary School District
Garden Grove Unified School District
Golden State Risk Management Authority
Hayward Area Recreation & Park District
Hermosa Beach City School District
Hope School District
Huntington Beach City School District
Indian Diggins School District
Irvine Unified School District
Jurupa Unified School District
Kelseyville Unified School District
Kern County Superintendent of Schools (KCSOS)
Kings County Office of Education
Konocti Unified School District
La Mesa Spring Valley Schools
Lemon Grove School District
Lindsay Unified School Districts
Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District
Livingston Union School District
Los Altos School District
Lynwood Unified School District
Manteca Unified School District
Moreno Valley Unified School District
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
New Haven Unified School District
Natomas Charter School
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 83 of 92
NorCal Cities Self-Insurance Fund
North Coast Schools Insurance Group
Northern California Regional Liability Excess Fund (NCR) Northern California Schools Insurance Group
Oakley Union Elementary School District
Oroville City Elementary School District
Oroville Union High School District
Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA)
Palm Springs Unified School District
Poway Unified School Districts
Redondo Beach Unified School District
Redwood Empire Schools Insurance Group (RESIG)
Riverside Unified School District
Rowland Unified School District
San Marcos Unified School District
San Mateo Schools Insurance Group
Santa Clara Unified
Santa Rosa City Schools
Sausalito Marin City School District
School & College Legal Services of California
Schools Association For Excess Risk (SAFER)
Schools Excess Liability Fund (SELF)
Schools Insurance Authority (SIA)
Schools Insurance Group (SIG)
Sebastopol Charter
Sebastopol Independent Charter School
Shasta-Trinity Schools Insurance Group
Sierra Sands Unified School District
Sonoma Charter School
Sonoma County Office of Education
Southern California Regional Liability Excess Fund (SCR) Special District Risk Management Authority
Torrance Unified School Districts
Town of Fort Jones
Town of Truckee
Tri Valley Wheels
Trindel Risk Management for Rural Counties
Tulare Joint Union High School District
Tuolumne JPA
Upper Lake Unified School District
Vacaville Unified School District
Visions in Education
West Covina Unified School District
West Side Union Elementary School District
Westminster School District
Wheatland Union High School District
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 84 of 92
Wright Elementary School District
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 85 of 92
Exhibit 5
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 86 of 92
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 87 of 92
August 27, 2026
The Honorable Monique Limón The Honorable Robert Rivas Senate President pro Tempore Assembly Speaker
California State Senate California State Assembly
1021 O Street, Suite 8518 1021 O Street, Suite 8330 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: Opposition to Forthcoming Wildfire Liability Reform Package that Would Limit Public Agency Recovery
Dear Senate Pro Tem Limon and Assembly Speaker Rivas,
On behalf of the League of California Cities (Cal Cities), the California State Association of Counties (CSAC), the Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC), and the undersigned local elected officials, cities and counties, we are calling on you to reject efforts to limit public agency recovery when private electric utilities cause wildfires, as proposed in the Governor’s wildfire liability reform package, prompted by the SB 254 Report.
This proposal will wrongly shift costs to taxpayers and force devastating consequences on public agencies and wildfire victims already struggling to rebuild their communities.
The proposal relies on the false hopes that public property, infrastructure and emergency response costs can be recovered from FEMA or insurance. Limiting public agency recovery will only shift costs to taxpayers and leave public agencies financially stranded – or even worse, bankrupt. We strongly oppose the following reforms and urge the Legislature to reject them outright from being included in any wildfire package that will advance this legislative session.
1. Limiting Public Property and Infrastructure Damages Imperils Public Agencies Tasked with Rebuilding their Communities
The proposal will have negligent private electric utilities pay just pennies on the dollar to rebuild critical infrastructure and public facilities that are destroyed. Limiting such costs to the mere depreciated value of the public facility or infrastructure will impact the rebuilding of:
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 88 of 92
• Public facilities and buildings
• Water, sewer, roads, communication, and traffic signal infrastructure • Parks, schools, libraries, and fire stations
When a private electric utility causes a wildfire, they are required to fully compensate for property damage. Public agencies cannot rebuild damaged infrastructure on recovery dollars that only cover the depreciated value of an asset. Rebuilding public facilities and infrastructure is not a luxury - it is an essential public service for homeowners, businesses, and communities to return home.
2. Limiting Recovery for Emergency Response and Mutual Aid Forces Public Agencies to Absorb Costs and Increase Financial Risk, Waiting Years For FEMA Reimbursement While Communities Struggle to Recover
The proposal prevents public agencies from recovering emergency response and mutual aid costs from the very private electric utilities who cause these devastating wildfires and inappropriately suggest FEMA as the solution. Limiting emergency response cost recovery will be catastrophic for small jurisdictions and fracture our mutual aid system upon which the state and communities rely on. There is a federal obligation to pursue negligent parties per the Stafford Act. This will create ambiguity when negligent parties must meet that requirement and will jeopardize federal reimbursement. FEMA has strict rules on recoverability, and some events aren’t even eligible for FEMA reimbursement. Since FEMA is a reimbursement model, funds must be spent upfront.
Interpretations in FEMA change from Administration to Administration, creating uncertainty whether future relief will even be available for these incidents.
3. Eliminating Property Tax Losses Leaves Communities Financially Stranded Schools, cities, counties, and special districts rely on property taxes to fund basic needs in our communities. The proposal will financially strand public agencies by eliminating the ability to bring claims for lost property taxes. This has tremendous consequences for essential public services, including fire, police, social services programs, drinking water, public infrastructure, and drastically risks school closure.
There is no evidence in the SB 254 Report to suggest that public agency claims are unreasonable or unjustified. Public agency damages amounted to merely 4% of the total wildfire claims that utilities paid from 2017 to 2024. Public infrastructure, lost tax revenue, emergency response, and mutual aid are necessary and critical for local governments to function while struggling to rebuild their communities. If public agencies cannot recover costs from negligent private electric utilities, local taxpayers will pay more instead. The very survivors whose community burned will foot the bill which is NOT an equitable approach to socializing wildfire risk.
We respectfully request the Legislature to protect public infrastructure, safeguard emergency response and our mutual aid system, and protect taxpayers from this private electric utility bailout – and to reject the Governor’s proposal to limit public agency recovery when such utilities cause wildfires.
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 89 of 92
Sincerely,
Melissa Sparks-Kranz John Kennedy
Legislative Advocate Senior Policy Advocate
League of California Cities Rural County Representatives of California
Jordan Wells
Legislative Advocate
California State Association of Counties
And on behalf of the following cities, counties and local elected officials:
City of Arcata
City of Artesia
City of Atascadero
City of Albany
City of Agoura Hills
City of Azusa
Alameda County
Town of Apple Valley
City of Benicia
City of Bellflower
City of Buena Park
City of Beverly Hills
City of Big Bear Lake
City of Brea
Calaveras County
Contra Costa County
City of Camarillo
City of Coachella
City of Claremont
City of Colton
City of Clearlake
City of Corona
City of Cloverdale
City of Carlsbad
City of Daly City
City of Del Mar
City of Diamond Bar
City of Downey
City of Danville
City of Dublin
City of El Cerrito
City of Emeryville
El Dorado County
City of Fremont
Fresno County
City of Glendora
City of Greenfield
City of Goleta
City of Hayward
City of Half Moon Bay
City of Hemet
City of Hesperia
City of Highland
City of Irvine
City of Jackson
Kern County
Lake County
City of La Mirada
City of La Verne
City of Lake Elsinore
City of Lakeport
City of Lake Forest
City of Lakewood
City of Lomita
City of Los Alamitos
City of Livermore
Lassen County
City of Manteca
City of Maywood
City of Moreno Valley
Marin County
Mariposa County
Mendocino County
Monterey County
Modoc County
Mono County
City of Monrovia
City of Morgan Hill
City of Mission Viejo
City of Napa
Napa County
Nevada County
City of Oakland
City of Oceanside
City of Orinda
City of Palm Desert
City of Petaluma
City of Poway
City of Point Arena
Placer County
Ci
ty of Pleasanton
City of Rosemead
City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Redwood City
City of Rio Dell
City of Riverside
City of Rolling Hills
City of Rolling Hills Estates
City of San Fernando
City of San Jose
City of San Marcos
City of Santa Cruz
City of Santee
City of Salinas
City of Seal Beach
City of Santa Rosa
City of Sierra Madre
City of Stanton
City of Sunnyvale
City of Santa Monica
City of Santa Barbara
City of Solana Beach
City of San Luis Obispo
City of Santa Paula
City of Saratoga
City of South Gate
Santa Cruz County
Santa Barbara County
San Bernardino County
Santa Clara County
San Joaquin County
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 90 of 92
San Mateo County
San Luis Obispo County
Sonoma County
Stanislaus County
Sutter County
Sacramento County
Tehama County
City of Temecula
City of Torrance
City of Thousand Oaks
City of Tracy
City of Tustin
City of Vacaville
City of Visalia
City of Vista
City of Walnut
City of Walnut Creek
City of Weed
City of West Hollywood
City of Whittier
City of Willits
City of Yreka
Yolo County
Yuba County
Marin County Council of
Mayors and Councilmembers
Orange County Fire Authority
Sonoma County Mayor’s and
Councilmembers’ Association
Ventura Council of Governments
Supervisor Anne Contrell, Napa County
Mayor Brett Taylor, City of Visalia
Mayor Bill Powers, City of Portola
Mayor Betsy Smegal Andersen, City of Piedmont
Vice Mayor Conna McCarthy, City of Piedmont
Mayor Dr. Cynthia Gonzalez, City of Cudahy
Mayor Carlos Juarez, City of Santa Paula
Mayor David Tennessen, City of Camarillo
Councilmember Debby Stegura, City of Rolling Hills Estates Councilmember Dorothy Pemberton, City of Downey
Councilmember David McGowan, City of Palos Verdes Estates Councilmember Evan Branning, City of Livermore
Mayor Frank J. Navarro, City of Colton
Supervisor Gary Bradford, Yuba County
Mayor Glenn R. Sylvester, City of Daly City
Councilmember Holly Tillman, City of Clayton
Supervisor Jake Withrow, Glenn County
Supervisor Jill Cox, Trinity County
Supervisor Justin Cummings, Santa Cruz County
Vice Mayor Jaime Patino, City of Union City
Councilmember Jen Long, City of Piedmont
Mayor Joshua Barron, City of South Gate
Mayor John Stephens, City of Costa Mesa
Mayor Kevin Wilk, City of Walnut Creek
Supervisor Kim De Serpa, Santa Cruz County
Mayor Kerry Hills, City of Moraga
Councilmember Larry Spicer, City of Monrovia
Councilmember Lorrel Plimier, City of Piedmont
Supervisor Manu Koenig, Santa Cruz County
Supervisor Monica Martinez, Santa Cruz County
Mayor Michael Kemps, City of Palos Verdes Estates
Mayor Mike Hannon, City of Newark
Mayor Pro Tem Dr. Monica Sánchez, City of Pico Rivera
Councilmember Nathan Steele, City of Seal Beach
Councilmember Norma Martínez-Rubin, City of Pinole
Councilmember Pamela Campos, City of San Jose
Mayor Stephanie Hellman, City of Fairfax
Mayor Sylvia Lemus, City of Cotati
Chair of Supervisors Sukhminder S. Dhaliwal, San Joaquin County Vice Mayor Steve “Woody” Culleton, Town of Paradise
Councilmember Tom Ramsey, City of Piedmont
Councilmember Xouhoa Bowen, City of San Leandro
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 91 of 92
cc: The Honorable Governor Gavin Newsom
Members, California State Senate
Members, California State Assembly
Sept. 8, 2026
Item #2 Page 92 of 92
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM City of Carlsbad
Legislative Subcommittee Meeting
September 8, 2026
Sharon Gonsalves, Managing Director, California Public Policy Group CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM 2026 Legislative Calendar
• January 1: All legislation signed into law in 2025, unless otherwise stated, goes into effect • January 5: The Legislature reconvenes for the 2026 legislative session • January 10: The Governor releases fiscal year 2026-27 budget proposal • January 31: Last day for two-year bills to advance out of their house of origin • February 20: Last day for the Legislature to introduce bills • March 25: Spring Recess begins upon adjournment
• April 6: Legislature reconvenes from Spring Recess
• Mid-May: Governor releases the May revision of the state budget • May 29: Last day for the Legislature to pass bills out of their house of origin • June 15: Legislature must pass the primary budget bill • June 30: Governor must sign the primary budget bill
• July 2: Summer Recess begins upon adjournment
• August 3: Legislature reconvenes from Summer Recess
• August 31: Last day for the Legislature to pass bills; end of the 2026 session • September 30: Last day for the Governor to sign or veto bills CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM Sponsored and Positioned Bills
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM City Sponsored Bills
AB 2179 (Patel) Workplace violence: restraining orders.
This bill would, beginning on July 1, 2027, allow any party or witness to a petition for a restraining order to appear remotely at a hearing and would prohibit any fee for appearing remotely.
Status: Governor’s Desk
AB 2453 (Rodriguez, Michelle) Vehicles: off-highway motor vehicles.
This bill would authorize first responders to operate off-highway motor vehicles in an emergency response situation. The bill would also authorize peace officers and first responders to operate off-highway motor vehicles upon a highway, at a distance not to exceed 5 miles, for the purpose of accessing off-highway recreational areas or locations of patrol, within jurisdictions that have adopted a policy or plan for the operation of those off-highway motor vehicles pursuant to the provisions as specified.
Status: Governor’s Desk
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM Positioned Legislation
Bill Bill Name Location Position
AB 35 (Alvarez) Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, Drought Preparedness, and Clean Air Bond Act of 2024:
Administrative Procedure Act: exemption: program
guidelines and selection criteria.
Chaptered Support
AB 748
(Harabedian)
Single-family and multifamily housing units:
preapproved plans.
Held in Senate
Appropriations
Oppose
AB 956 (Quirk-
Silva)
Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling
units.
Governor’s Desk Oppose
AB 1337 (Ward)
Information Practices Act of 1977. Dead Oppose
AB 1569 (Davies) Pupil safety: electric bicycle: safety and training program.
Chaptered Support
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM Positioned Legislation
Bill Bill Name Location Position
AB 1614 (Dixon) Vehicles: bicycles. Chaptered Support
AB 1621 (Wilson) Planning and Zoning Law: postentitlement phase permits: Housing Accountability Act.
Governor’s Desk Oppose
AB 1821 (Pacheco) California Public Records Act: agency response time. Governor’s Desk Support AB 2296 (Papan) Planning and zoning: housing element: regional housing needs allocation.
Governor’s Desk Support
AB 2346 (Wilson) Vehicles: electric bicycles and speed limits. Governor’s Desk Support AB 2433 (Alvarez) Housing development: density bonus. Governor’s Desk Oppose Unless Amended
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM Positioned Legislation
Bill Bill Name Location Position
SB 329
(Blakespear)
Alcohol and drug recovery: licensed treatment facilities and certified programs: investigations.
Governor’s Desk Support
SB 490 (Umberg)
Alcohol and drug programs. Governor’s Desk Support
SB 722 (Wahab) Transit-oriented housing development: excluded parcels and sites.
Chaptered Support
SB 741
(
Blakespear)
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program. Governor’s Desk Support SB 758 (Umberg) Public health: nitrous oxide. Governor’s Desk Support SB 936
(
Blakespear)
Nitrous oxide: sales. Governor’s Desk Support
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM Positioned Legislation
Bill Bill Name Location Position
SB 1014 (Grayson) Development projects: preliminary estimate of required improvements: onsite and offsite
improvements.
Governor’s Desk Oppose
SB 1036 (Grayson)
Mitigation Fee Act. Chaptered Watch
SB 1159
(Cabaldon)
Artificial intelligence: transparency and governance. Governor’s Desk Support SB 1167
(
Blakespear)
Vehicles: electric bicycles. Governor’s Desk Support
SJR 12 (Laird) Proposed 2026–2031 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program: opposition.
Chaptered Support
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM Legislative Update
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM Legislative Update: Public Safety
AB 2760 (Sharp Collins) Wearable Electroshock Devices
Gut and amend would prohibit ICE agents and state and local officers from wearing any device that can deliver electric shocks. It would also block California police departments from purchasing the devices with state money.
Status: Governor’s Desk
SB 1013 (Cervantes) Automated License Plate Readers
Prohibit a public agency from retaining ALPR information for more than 30 days if it does not match information on an authorized hot list.
Status: Held on Assembly Floor
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM Legislative Update: Environment and Climate
AB 1448 (Hart) California Coastal Sanctuary: Oil and Gas Development Prohibit the State Lands Commission (SLC) from entering into any lease for the extraction of oil or gas from state-owned tide and submerged lands in the California Coastal Sanctuary in areas designated as California marine protected areas pursuant to the Marine Life Protection Act.
Status: Governor’s Desk
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM Legislative Update: Tort Reform
• Lawmakers reached an agreement and approved SB 577 (Laird) to give public agencies some relief from the rising costs of sexual assault lawsuits but stopped short of capping monetary damages for victims.
• The deal would raise the standard of proof alleged victims must meet in older cases and limit how much a public entity is required to pay when it is found to be only partially liable for the abuse.
• The agreement marks the first major attempt to address the financial impact of AB 218 — a 2019 law that dramatically expanded the window of time people have to file lawsuits alleging they were sexually abused as children. • Tort Reform will be an ongoing issue in 2027.
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM Legislative Update: Wildfire Liability
The Governor and Legislative leadership reached a deal on the much-anticipated wildfire liability package, by gut-and- amending SB 492 (Becker).
This language was not put into print until 7:26 A.M. August 29. With the 72-hour in print rule, the Legislature couldn’t vote on this bill until at least 7:26 A.M. on Tuesday, September 1.
The Bill included:
1. Wildfire risk data platform & state wildfire-prevention reporting
2. Wildfire Fund Continuation Account — new bonding authority
3. New California Wildfire Relief Fast-Pay Program
4. Attorney conduct and fee restrictions
5. Restrictions on private-equity litigation funding & claim trafficking
6. IOU executive incentive compensation
On September1, the Assembly did not take up SB 492 for a vote leaving the issue to be pursued at a later time.
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM Looking Ahead…
• New Gubernatorial Administration in 2027
• New appointments to key administrative positions and state agencies? • Continue or drop previous policies: 2035 EV mandate and other climate goals • Legislature’s Composition Creates Opportunity For Long-term Relationship Building • New legislative delegation in 2027
• Stable Legislative leadership (for now), maintaining existing Committee Chairs • Statewide Climate Priorities
• Advanced Clean Fleets
• Grid reliability, EV objectives
• VMT
• Complete streets
• Federal Tensions:California vs. DC
• Will legislating and budget grind to a halt in DC next Congress? • Funding weaponization towards California
• Equity prioritizations and challenges
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM Questions/Discussion
Thank You!
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP • PUBLICPOLICYGROUP .COM