Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council
November 1, 2022

CITYOF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Mayor Dave Potter, Council Members Jeff Baron,
Karen Ferlito, Bobby Richards, and Carrie Theis
Contact: 831.620.2000 www.ci.carmel.ca.us
All meetings are held in the City Council Chambers
East Side of Monte Verde Street
Between Ocean and 7th Avenues

REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, November 1, 2022
OPEN SESSION is at 4:30 PM (in person at City Hall and via teleconference), CLOSED SESSION is at 3:00 PM (via teleconference only)
Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20 has allowed local legislative bodies to hold public meetings via teleconference and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body.

To that end, OPEN SESSION will be held via teleconference and in-person in the City Council Chambers at City Hall located on Monte Verde Street between Ocean and Seventh Avenue. To participate via teleconference click the following link to attend via Zoom (or copy and paste link in your browser): https://ci-carmel-caus.zoom.us/j/85863804198 Meeting ID: 858 6380 4198 Passcode: 707855 Dial In: 253- 215-8782
To participate in this meeting in-person in the City Council Chambers, the public must show proof of vaccination (including virus booster) and wear a face covering at all times. Seating will be limited and available on a first come first served basis.

CLOSED SESSION - 3:00 PM (via teleconference only, Zoom link above)

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
PUBLIC APPEARANCE - Limited to Items on Closed Session

CLOSED SESSION
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO

GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54956.9 (d)(1) --EXISTING LITIGATION
Name of case: GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership, a California limited partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless v. City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, et.al.

United States District Court (Northern District) Case No. 5:22-CV-00347-NC

OPEN SESSION
4:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

PUBLIC APPEARANCES
Members of the public are entitled to speak on matters of municipal concern not on the agenda during Public Appearances. Each person's comments shall be limited to 3 minutes, or as otherwise established by the Chair.

Matters not appearing on the agenda will not receive action at this meeting and may be referred to staff. Persons are not required to provide their names, and it is helpful for speakers to state their names so they may be identified in the minutes of the meeting.

ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. City Administrator Announcements
B. City Attorney Announcements
C. Council Member Announcements

CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the consent agenda are routine in nature and do not require discussion or independent action. Members of the Council, Board or Commission or the public may ask that any items be considered individually for purposes of Council, Board or Commission discussion and/ or for public comment. Unless that is done, one motion may be used to adopt all recommended actions.

1. October 3, 2022, Special Meeting Minutes, and October 4, 2022, Regular Meeting Minutes

2. September 2022 Check Register Summary

3. September 2022 Monthly Reports

4. Resolution 2022-093, Proclaiming the Continuing Need To Meet By Teleconference Pursuant To Government Code Section 54953 (e)

5. Resolution 2022-094 Authorizing the City Administrator to execute a Professional Services Agreement with EMC Planning Group Inc., for a not-to-exceed fee of $175,000, to conduct the Coastal Engineering and Adaptation Planning Project

6. Resolution 2022-095, Authorizing Free Use Days of the Sunset Center Theater and Lobby for the Carmel Public Library Foundation and Carmel Unified School District

7. Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-003 (Second Reading) - Amending Municipal Code Section 2.52.630 pertaining to eligibility for new hires to use accrued vacation leave in the first year of employment

ORDERS OF BUSINESS
Orders of Business are agenda items that require City Council, Board or Commission discussion, debate, direction to staff, and/or action.

8. 2022 Car Week After Action Report

9. Resolution 2022-096, adopting the 2022 Monterey County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

10. Provide feedback on the Design Traditions 1.5 Strategy Paper

11. Resolution 2022-097 Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a Sixth Amendment to the City Administrator At-Will Employment Agreement Effective October 1, 2022

PUBLIC HEARINGS

12. Consider Resolution No. 2022-098 amending CDP 18-231 to extend the current Beach Fire Management Pilot Program by six months, with an end date of May 15, 2023

13. Resolution 2022-099, Agreement between the County of Monterey and the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea for joint participation in the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funding program for fiscal years 2019-2023

14. First Reading - Ordinance 2022-004 amending Carmel Municipal Code (CMC) Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) by adopting the 2022 editions of the California Building (CBC), Residential (CRC), Energy (CEnC), Fire (CFC), Mechanical (CMC), Plumbing (CPC), Electrical (CEC), Green Building Standards (CGBSC), Historic Building (HBC), and Existing Building Codes (EBC) with local amendments.

15. First Reading - Ordinance 2022-005 Amending Section 2.74.010(B) of the Carmelby-the-Sea Municipal Code Related to Board Member Qualifications for the Historic Resources Board

16. Introduction and Adoption of Urgency Ordinance 2022-006 - Urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Adopting Rules of Conduct for Attending Meetings of Legislative Bodies at City Facilities

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

ADJOURNMENT

17. Correspondence Received After Agenda Posting
This agenda was posted at City Hall, Monte Verde Street between Ocean Avenue and 7th Avenue, outside the Park Branch Library, NE corner of Mission Street and 6thAvenue, the Carmel-by-the-Sea Post Office, 5thAvenue between Dolores Street and San Carlos Street, and the City's webpage http://www.ci.carmel.ca.us in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL RECEIVED AFTER THE POSTING OF THEAGENDA Any supplemental writings or documents distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda, received after the posting of the agenda will be available for public review at City Hall located on Monte Verde Street between Ocean and Seventh Avenues during regular business hours.

SPECIAL NOTICES TO PUBLIC
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 831-620-2000 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to ensure that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting (28CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II).

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
November 1, 2022

CONSENT AGENDA
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Nova Romero, City Clerk
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
SUBJECT:

October 3, 2022, Special Meeting Minutes, and October 4, 2022, Regular Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Draft Minutes.

BACKGROUND/SUMMARY:

The City Council routinely approves minutes of its meetings.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

PRIOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION:

None.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1) October 3, 2022, Special Meeting Minutes
Attachment 2) October 4, 2022, Regular Meeting Minutes

CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Monday, October 3, 2022
4:00 PM

OPEN SESSION

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Mayor Potter called the special meeting to order at 4:11 p.m.

Roll Call: Council Members Baron, Ferlito, Theis, Mayor Pro Tem Richards and Mayor Potter were present.

CONSENT AGENDA
Council Member Baron pulled Item 1 from Consent and stated he will be voting no because he would like to see all of the boards and commissions return to in-person meetings.

Item 1 - Resolution 2022-087 of the City Council of the City Of Carmel-by-the-Sea Proclaiming the Continuing Need To Meet By Teleconference Pursuant To Government Code Section 54953 (e)
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Richards to adopt Resolution 2022-087, seconded by Mayor Potter, and approved 4-1-0-0 with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Council Members Ferlito, Theis, Richards, and Mayor Potter NOES: Council Member Baron
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Potter read the closed session title.

Item 2 - CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (d)(1) --EXISTING LITIGATION
Name of case: GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership, a California limited partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless v. City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, et.al.

United States District Court (Northern District) Case No. 5:22-CV-00347-NC Public Comment: None
Council moved to closed session.

ADJOURNMENT
Council adjourned from Closed Session at 4:54 p.m.

APPROVED:
______________________________ __________________________ Dave Potter, Mayor Nova Romero, MMC, City Clerk
Attachment 1

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, October 4, 2022

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Mayor Potter called the closed session meeting to order at 3:00 PM.

Roll Call: Council Members Baron, Ferlito, Theis, Mayor Pro Tem Richards and Mayor Potter were present.

CLOSED SESSION - 3:00 PM
City Attorney Pierik read the closed session titles.

A. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PERSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957
Title: City Administrator
B. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS – Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency designated representatives: Mayor Pro Tem Richards and City Attorney Unrepresented employee: City Administrator
Council adjourned to closed session at 3:04 p.m.

TOUR OF INSPECTION - 3:30 PM
Council returned from closed session, and conducted the tour of inspection of the following locations:

A. Mills Act – Monte Verde Street 2 northeast of 9th Avenue, Block 94, Lot 18 (Strom and Miller) B. Mills Act – Southeast Corner of San Antonio Avenue and 4th Avenue Block HH, Lot 28 (Ludwick)
C. Mills Act – Vizcaino Avenue 12 southwest of Mountain View Avenue, Block 102, Lot 12 & 13 (Prentiss)
OPEN SESSION – 4:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Mayor Potter called the regular City Council meeting to order at 4:30 p.m.

Roll Call: Council Members Baron, Ferlito, Theis, Mayor Pro Tem Richards and Mayor Potter were present.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Assistant City Administrator Maxine Gullo led the pledge of allegiance.

EXTRAORDINARY BUSINESS
Attachment 2

CC Regular Meeting Minutes
A. Proclamation - Childhood Cancer Awareness Week
Council Member Baron read the proclamation.

B. Receive a presentation on street addresses to be discussed, and provide staff with direction
Administrative Analyst Emily Garay gave a presentation on the topic and answered questions from Council.

Public Comment:

Betty Maurutto, Betty Kullas, and Jana Schilling spoke in favor of street addresses. Nancy Twomey addressed the Council.

Council discussion resumed. Council gave direction to staff to continue to do research on the topic and confirm if implementing a street address system will require mail delivery service, and if so staff inform the Council and ask for further direction. Staff will return to Council with their findings and a preliminary plan for community engagement and feedback on the topic of street address implementation.

C. Receive a presentation on Parking Management Program Parking Management Program Consultant Brian Uhler gave a presentation on the topic and answered questions from Council.

Public Comment:

Judy Tollner and Parker Logan spoke against paid parking. Nancy Twomey addressed the Council.

Council discussion resumed. Council directed Mr. Uhler to move forward with his recommendations on the next steps to begin a parking management program beginning in January after the new Council is seated.

PUBLIC APPEARANCE
None

ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. CITY ADMINISTRATOR - Assistant City Administrator Gullo thanked Council for the opportunity to sit at the helm of the meeting while City Administrator Rerig was attending a conference. She thanked the community for their input on the design guidelines workshop last night. She announced that Public Works will be planting new trees during the month of October.

She announced upcoming City events: October 27 - Third Thursday in the park, 4-7 p.m., Attachment 2

CC Regular Meeting Minutes
October 29 - Annual pumpkin roll 2-4 p.m. and Hocus Pocus movie in Devendorf Park in the evening, October 31 – the Annual Halloween parade at 4 p.m. and trick or treating in the park to follow.

B. CITY ATTORNEY - No reports from closed session.

C. CITY COUNCIL
Council Member Baron – No reports
Council Member Ferlito – No reports
Council Member Theis - Announced that October 8th there will be a Meet the Makers, art and wine tasting event.

Mayor Pro-Tem Richards – Announced that October 6th is the Taste of Carmel event put on by the Chamber of Commerce.

Mayor Potter – Reported that he attend the design traditions workshop last night there was great discussion and lots of interest and passion from the community. He voiced concern about homes that have their garages right on the front edge of the property with no area to back out, and is dangerous for cars to back out onto the street, especially on Carpenter Street.

CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Potter pulled Item 7 from the Consent agenda.

Item 1 - August 1, 2022 Special Meeting Minutes, and September 13, 2022 Regular Meeting Minutes
Item 2 - August 2022 Monthly Reports
Item 3 - August 2022 Check Register Summary
Item 4 - Resolution 2022-088, awarding a Professional Services Agreement to Schaaf & Wheeler to amend the City’s Storm Drain Master Plan
Item 5 - Resolution 2022-089, waiving a bid irregularity and awarding a three-year on-call Landscape Maintenance Services contract to Town & Country Gardening & Landscaping, with a not-to-exceed fee for Fiscal Year 2022/23 of $140,000 Item 6 - Resolution 2022-090, authorizing the City Administrator to execute an agreement with Public Risk Innovation, Solutions, and Management (PRISM) risk management for the term of October 15, 2022, to June 30, 2023 in an amount not to exceed the $50,000 approved in the FY 22-23 budget
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Richards to approve consent agenda items 1-6, seconded by Council Member Theis, and approved 5-0-0-0 with the following roll call vote:

Attachment 2

CC Regular Meeting Minutes
AYES: Council Members Baron, Ferlito, Theis, Richards, and Mayor Potter NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT
Item 7 - Resolution 2022-091 approving a supplemental budget appropriation to the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Adopted budget for Discretionary Grants in the amount of $1,000 for the Carmel High School Mock Trial Team
Mayor Potter requested that Council to increase the donation amount from $1,000 to $5,000. He added that former Carmel Mayor Sue McCloud has generously offered to match the City’s donation up to $5,000. Council discussion resumed.

Public Comment: None
Motion by Mayor Potter, to adopt Resolution 2022-091 with an amendment to increase the donation amount to $5,000, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Richards, and approved 5-0-0-0 with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Council Members Baron, Ferlito, Theis, Richards, and Mayor Potter NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

ORDERS OF BUSINESS
Item 8 - Resolution 2022-092 authorizing the City Administrator to execute a purchase agreement for the purchase of a One (1) Pierce Manufacturing, Inc. Enforcer 1500 GPM Pumper (HGAC Consortium Purchase – Contract FS12-19, Product Code FS19VC07) for a not to exceed in the amount of $880,000
Public Safety Director Ward gave a presentation on the item.

Public Comment: None
Council discussion followed.

Motion by Baron to approve the purchase of a diesel fire engine and adopt Resolution 2022- 092, seconded by Council Member Theis, and approved 5-0-0-0 with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Council Members Baron, Ferlito, Theis, Richards, and Mayor Potter NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Attachment 2

CC Regular Meeting Minutes
Item 9 - Receive a presentation on the 2022 editions of the California Building (CBC), Residential (CRC), Energy (CEnC), Fire (CFC), Mechanical (CMC), Plumbing (CPC), Electrical (CEC), Green Building Standards (CGBSC), Historic Building (HBC), and Existing Building Codes (EBC) with local amendments to be discussed, and provide staff with direction
Building Official Jermel Laurie gave a presentation and answered questions from Council.

Public Comment:

Judy Tollner and Edan Asturi addressed the Council.

Council discussion followed. Council consensus to move forward with the October 12th community meeting and have the first reading of the building code Ordinance added to the November 1, 2022 meeting.

Council took a recess at 6:35 p.m., and reconvened at 6:45 p.m.

Item 10 - Discussion regarding potential amendments to the City's Mills Act Contract policy Principal Planner Marnie Waffle gave a presentation and answered questions from Council.

Public Comment: None
Council Member Ferlito said she would like consider a cap on the tax break, and limit the number of Mills Act contracts at any given time since the yearly inspections require lots of staff resources. Council Member Theis said she would like to consider the length of the contract and that 20 years may be too long for the tax break, and Mayor Pro Tem Richards and Council Member Baron agreed. Council Member Baron expressed concerns about commercial properties that make millions and get the benefit of reduced taxes for 20 years.

Council consensus to continue the discussion on amending the City’s Mills Act Contract policy in the future.

Item 11 - Discussion on amending the qualifications for the Historic Resources Board Members City Clerk Romero gave a presentation on the item and answered questions from Council.

Public Comment:

Edan Asturi addressed the Council.

Council discussion followed. Council consensus to return with a first reading Ordinance to amend City Code Chapter 2.74.010(B), to expand the residency requirements for Historic Resources Board members to allow up to two (2) members to reside within Monterey County, outside of Carmel-by-theSea, so long as they meet the other qualifications regarding relevant experience or knowledge.

Attachment 2

CC Regular Meeting Minutes
Item 12 - Discussion on rescinding Urgency Ordinance 2022-002 - Adopting Rules of Conduct for attending meetings of Legislative Bodies at City Facilities City Clerk Romero gave a presentation on the item and answered questions from Council.

Public comment: None.

Council discussion followed. Council discussed coming back with a new Urgency Ordinance to amend the rules of conduct for attending meetings of legislative bodies removing the requirement to show a vaccine card to enter City facilities, and require masks be worn if the CDC Community Level at the time of the agenda posting is medium or high, and to have the level posted on the agenda.

Motion by Council Member Baron, directing staff to return with an Urgency Ordinance to repeal and replace Urgency Ordinance 2022-002, removing the requirement to show a vaccine card to enter City facilities, masks are required if the CDC Community Level at the time of the agenda posting is medium or high, per the guidance of the California Department of Public Health, seconded by Mayor Potter, and approved 5-0-0-0 with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Council Members Baron, Ferlito, Theis, Richards, and Mayor Potter NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

PUBLIC HEARINGS
Item 13 - Introduction of Ordinance No. 2022-003 (First Reading) - Amending Municipal Code Section 2.52.630 pertaining to eligibility for new hires to use accrued vacation leave in the first year of employment
Assistant City Administrator Gullo gave a presentation on the item.

Public Comment: None
Council discussion followed.

Motion by Council Member Baron to read by title only, waive full reading, introducing Ordinance 2022-003 and passing to second reading on November 1st, seconded by Council Member Theis, and approved 5-0-0-0 with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Council Members Baron, Ferlito, Theis, Richards, and Mayor Potter NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Item 14 - MA 22-204 (Prentiss): Consideration of a recommendation from the Historic Resources Board to the City Council that the City enter into a Mills Act Historical Property Contract MA 22-204 (Prentiss) with Amanda S. Prentiss and Matthew J.

Attachment 2

CC Regular Meeting Minutes
Mermer for the historic “Marion Daniels Shand House” located at Vizcaino Avenue 12 southwest of Mountain View Avenue (APN 010-055-021)
Associate Planner Katherine Wallace gave a presentation and answered questions from Council.

Public Comment: Dr. Matthew Mermer, applicant, addressed the Council.

Council discussion followed.

Motion by Council Member Baron to approve the Mills Act Contract MA 22-204 (Prentiss), seconded by Council Member Theis, and approved 5-0-0-0 with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Council Member Baron, Ferlito, Theis, Richards, Mayor Potter NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Item 15 - MA 22-214 (Ludwick): Consideration of a recommendation from the Historic Resources Board to the City Council that the City enter into a Mills Act Historical Property Contract MA 22-214 (Ludwick) with Christopher & Adrienne Ludwick Trust for the historic “Frederick Ten Winkel House” located at the southeast corner of San Antonio Avenue and 4th Avenue (APN 010-253-018)
Associate Planner Katherine Wallace gave a presentation and answered questions from Council.

Public Comment: Mr. Ludwick, applicant, addressed the Council.

Council discussion followed.

Motion by Mayor Potter to approve the Mills Act Contract MA 22-214 (Ludwick), seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Richards, and approved 5-0-0-0 with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Council Member Baron, Ferlito, Theis, Richards, Mayor Potter NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Item 16 - MA 22-254 (Strom & Miller): Consideration of a recommendation from the Historic Resources Board to the City Council that the City enter into a Mills Act Historical Property Contract MA 22-254 (Strom & Miller) with Nancy Strom and Gavin Miller for the historic “Enoch A. Lewis House” located at Monte Verde Street 2 northeast of 9th Avenue (APN 010-193-010)
Public Comment: Nancy Strom, applicant, addressed the Council.

Council discussion followed.

Attachment 2

CC Regular Meeting Minutes
Motion by Council Member Theis to approve Mills Act Contract MA 22-254 (Strom & Miller), seconded by Mayor Potter, and approved 5-0-0-0 with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Council Member Baron, Ferlito, Theis, Richards, Mayor Potter NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Mayor Potter – Requested future discussion on garage encroachments.

ADJOURNMENT
Council adjourned at 8:00 p.m.

APPROVED:
______________________________ __________________________ Dave Potter Nova Romero, MMC
Mayor City Clerk
Attachment 2

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
November 1, 2022

CONSENT AGENDA
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Thomas Levandowski, Finance Manager
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
SUBJECT: September 2022 Check Register Summary
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the check register for September 2022.

BACKGROUND/SUMMARY:

The check register is produced from the City's financial system. The report groups the checks by the respective department or function. The check register includes the check number, the name of the vendor, a description of the purchase, the check issue date and the amount of the check.

Per the California Supreme Court's decision in the case of Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors v.

Superior Court (Dec. 29, 2016) (2016 WL 7473802), the check register excludes the specific invoice payments for legal services incurred for pending and active investigations, pending and active litigation, as well as recently concluded matters. The Supreme Court has ruled that these specific invoices are protected under attorney-client privilege and need not be disclosed under the Public Records Act.

On the last page of the report, staff have included the contract balance for the respective vendors that were paid in September.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The check register summary for September 2022 totals $3,478,295.45.

PRIOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION:

Council ratified the August 2022 check register at its October 4th regular meeting.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1) September 2022 Check Register Summary
September 2022 Check Register
Total 73,973.77
49897 Ryan Ranch Printers Business cards: T Ford 09/24/2022 86.31 49898 Comcast Business NonNGEN internet and recurring charges 09/28/2022 644.82 49888 Zoom Imaging Solutions, Imc. Business office copier usage fees 09/24/2022 501.84 49896 Office Depot, Inc. Business office supplies-Admin/Finance 09/24/2022 65.51 49883 Rydin Decal 500 Business license delivery vehicle stickers 09/24/2022 795.00 49885 Toshiba Financial Service Toshiba Copier lease Estudio 5506 09/24/2022 403.46 49881 Pitney Bowes Bank Inc Purchase Power Postage-meter refills 09/24/2022 3,636.25 49882 Robert Half Temporary payroll assistance services 09/24/2022 12,768.00 49874 Law Enforcement Psychological Serv, Inc Post employment psychological evaluations 09/24/2022 900.00 49879 Office Depot, Inc. Business office supplies-Admin/Finance 09/24/2022 128.66 49871 Carmel Pine Cone Legal noticing 09/24/2022 105.00 49873 Hayashi/Wayland Leadership Carmel 2022-23 class fee:E Garay 09/24/2022 1,700.00 49867 Alhambra Water service City Hall 09/24/2022 158.34 49870 Benefit Coordinators Corporation (BCC) Cobra Admin expenses 09/24/2022 300.00 49827 Hinderliter, De Llamas & Associates Sales/transactions tax auditing services Jul-Sep 2 09/13/2022 600.00 49829 United Way Of Monterey County 211 Monterey County Information & Referral Serv 09/13/2022 3,000.00 49818 Verizon Wireless C Rerig IPAD 09/09/2022 1,588.39 49819 Wageworks,Inc Healthcare monthly Admin and Compliance Fee 09/09/2022 170.00 49815 T-Mobile Monthly cell service, usage and purchases 09/09/2022 1,464.04 49817 US Bank Employee appreciation lunches 09/09/2022 1,799.70 49811 Ryan Ranch Printers Envelopes, stationary, business card and busines 09/09/2022 522.27 49812 Sprint Cell service fees, usage and purchases 09/09/2022 29.99 49809 Pitney Bowes Global Fin S Postage meter lease 09/09/2022 836.55 49810 Robert Half Temporary payroll assistance services 09/09/2022 9,120.00 49803 Next Request FOIA Workflow Platform-Standard subscription 09/09/2022 8,388.00 49804 Office Depot, Inc. Business office supplies-Admin/Finance 09/09/2022 246.83 49798 J 4 Systems Billable services for Systems Engineer 09/09/2022 160.00 49801 Monterey County Film Commission Marketing and media outreach 09/09/2022 2,500.00 49796 Image Sales Employee ID Badges 09/09/2022 58.62
49797 Iron Mountain Records storage service 09/09/2022 616.07 49785 Carmel Pine Cone Legal noticing 09/09/2022 1,231.50 49793 Digital Deployment Website support agreement:Maint, training, secur 09/09/2022 700.00 49779 Amazon Web Services Inc Data and cloud storage fees 09/09/2022 836.15 49780 AT&T Telephone service citywide 09/09/2022 3,158.93 49773 Toshiba Financial Service Toshiba Copier lease Estudio 5506 09/08/2022 373.06 49774 US Bank Printing of 22-23 Budget books 09/08/2022 5,367.92 49771 Pitney Bowes Bank Inc Purchase Power Postage-meter refills 09/08/2022 3,434.00 49772 Robert Half Temporary payroll assistance services 09/08/2022 2,736.00 49769 J 4 Systems Billable services for Systems Engineer 09/08/2022 640.00 49770 Minuteman Press 5000 Laser A/P checks 09/08/2022 1,272.60 49766 Comcast City Hall business cable service 09/08/2022 73.32 49767 Corbin Willits System MOM Financial system monthly fee 09/08/2022 720.79 Department: 111 City Administration
49761 Alhambra Water service City Hall 09/08/2022 135.85 49894 Dave Potter Cal Cities conference travel expenses 09/24/2022 4,553.66 Total 18,344.06
49817 US Bank SimpleTexting subscription 09/09/2022 278.40 49826 Carmel Youth Center Inc Council Grant FY 2022-23 09/13/2022 3,000.00 49794 Food Bank For Monterey County Council Discretionary Grant FY 22-23 09/09/2022 3,000.00 49807 Peninsula Messenger LLC Mail service sorting and delivery 09/09/2022 4,512.00 Department: 110 City Council
49784 Carmel Heritage Society Council Grant FY 22-23 09/09/2022 3,000.00 Check Vendor/Employee Transaction Description Date Amount Attachment 1
Total 42,080.45
49892 Comcast Police Dept cable services 09/24/2022 55.59 49895 Department of Justice/Accounting Office PD:Fingerprinting services 09/24/2022 194.00 49889 Alhambra Water service-PD 09/24/2022 245.56
49890 AT&T/FirstNet PD Wireless services 09/24/2022 89.49 49886 Transparent Glass Coatings, Inc PD vehicle window coating 09/24/2022 2,859.00 49887 Transunion Risk & Alterna PD: Monthly fee for information services 09/24/2022 1.60 49878 Napa Auto Parts Police Dept-Auto parts 09/24/2022 105.20 49884 Same Day Shred PD-Document shredding services 09/24/2022 45.00 49875 Lemos Service Inc Police Dept auto repairs 09/24/2022 115.88 49877 Mission Linen Service Fire Dept laundry service 09/24/2022 303.44 49869 Angel Armor Safety equipment 09/24/2022 3,539.44
49872 De Lage Landen Financial Police Dept copier lease 09/24/2022 161.70 49828 Mission Linen Service Fire Dept laundry service 09/13/2022 272.81 49868 Allied Universal Beach patrol services 09/24/2022 564.27 49814 T2 Systems Canada Inc. PD:Digital iris services 09/09/2022 75.00 49816 United Public Safety, Inc Ticketing Platform for PD:Hardware, software, tec 09/09/2022 256.38 49804 Office Depot, Inc. Police Dept office supplies 09/09/2022 933.60 49813 Summit Uniforms PD Uniform purchases 09/09/2022 882.66 49800 Mission Linen Service Fire Dept laundry service 09/09/2022 305.85 49802 Monterey County Health Department Annual Rediness Retainer fee CBS-PD FY 22-23 09/09/2022 2,000.00 49792 Department of Justice/Accounting Office PD:Fingerprinting services 09/09/2022 87.00 49799 Lemos Service Inc Police Dept auto repairs 09/09/2022 119.65 49789 Community Hospital of the Monterey PeninsuTesting services for Police Dept 09/09/2022 405.00 49790 County of Monterey, Dept of Emerg CommunDispatch Service-Quarterly 09/09/2022 13,279.00 49786 Carmel Towing & Garage Police Dept-Fuel expense 09/09/2022 5,090.49 49788 Comcast Police Dept cable services 09/09/2022 253.19 49778 Allied Universal Beach patrol services 09/09/2022 4,326.07 49783 Caltronics/J.J.R Enterprises. Inc Police Dept copier usage fees 09/09/2022 150.47 49776 Alan Ward Reimburse 2 classes Cal Coast Univ 09/09/2022 1,350.00 49777 Alhambra Water service-PD 09/09/2022 300.05
49763 AT&T/FirstNet PD Wireless services 09/08/2022 89.49 49774 US Bank PD Badges 09/08/2022 3,620.87
Total 9,613.96
Department: 116 Police
49762 American Messaging PD: PGCopy Followers Cell Services 09/08/2022 2.70 49860 Kelly-Moore Paint Company Inc Paint - Planning Office 09/24/2022 395.23 49864 Office Depot, Inc. FY 22-23: Office Supplies 09/24/2022 97.39 49856 CSG Consultants, Inc. FY 22-23: Building Dept. - Plan Review Svcs. 09/24/2022 459.00 49858 Engineered Fire Systems FY 22-23: Fire Inspection Plan Reviews 09/24/2022 937.50 49732 US Bank APA EDUCATION: Evan Kort, 08-05-2022 09/07/2022 1,624.06 49855 Carmel Towing & Garage FY 22-23: Building Dept. - Gas & Oil 09/24/2022 114.51 49725 IWORQ PCLUP - Parcel Upload - Monthly 09/07/2022 500.00 49729 Past Consultants LLC Historic Context Statement Update Project 09/07/2022 3,900.00 49721 Carmel Towing & Garage FY 22-23: Building Dept. - Gas & Oil 09/07/2022 57.00 49724 Engineered Fire Systems FY 22-23: Fire Inspection Plan Reviews - JULY 2 09/07/2022 1,437.50 Department: 115 Community Planning & Building
49719 Baystar Express Copy paper Business Office (Non-jamming) - Plan 09/07/2022 91.77 49825 Burke,Williams & Sorensen, LLP City Attorney services - July 2022 09/13/2022 45,014.50 Total 72,365.73
Department: 112 City Attorney
49823 Burke,Williams & Sorensen, LLP City Attorney services - Labor negotiations May 2 09/13/2022 27,351.23 Attachment 1 49852 Sentry Alarm Systems Alarm monitoring for City buildings 09/24/2022 360.00 49853 Tope's Tree Service Inc. Tree services Citywide as directed by City Forest 09/24/2022 3,400.00 49850 Poe's Plumbing & Backflow Plumbing repairs City facilities 09/24/2022 461.42 49851 Scarborough Lumber & Building Flagging tape - for Forestry 9/2/22 444285-4 09/24/2022 24.77 49848 Monterey Bay Pest Control, Inc Gopher hole pest control - 6/17/22 #18446 09/24/2022 450.00 49849 Monterey County Weekly Classifieds RFP-Landscape Maint Service Public Notice- For 09/24/2022 341.25 49846 Golden State Portables Porta-Potties FT & Events 09/24/2022 5,720.38 49847 Iverson Tree Service Tree work as directed by City Forester 09/24/2022 4,500.00 49843 Cintas Corporation PW Uniform Service 21/22 FY 09/24/2022 146.81 49844 Dominic Marquez Work Boot reinbursement per MOU 22/23 FY - 25 09/24/2022 250.00 49841 American Supply Company PW/FM Janitorial supplies 09/24/2022 412.97 49842 Caltronics/J.J.R Enterprises. Inc Copier Contract PUBLIC WORKS - FY22/23 09/24/2022 243.72 49760 Valley Saw & Garden Equipment Supplies for Forestry 09/08/2022 4,652.66 49818 Verizon Wireless PW 2 IPAD's 09/09/2022 1,626.16
49758 Uline Inc. PW Streets - Safety Supplies 09/08/2022 477.65 49759 US Bank Supplies for FM Div. CW-8/8/22 #6191 09/08/2022 2,014.88 49756 Tope's Tree Service Inc. Tree services citywide as directed by City Foreste 09/08/2022 6,821.00 49757 Tree Stuff Lockbox No 639707 Forestry safety equipment and supplies 09/08/2022 145.29 49754 Scarborough Lumber & Building Forestry supplies. 8/10/22 #443995-4 09/08/2022 320.43 49755 Sherwin-Williams Co. PW Paint and paint supplies 8/4/22 2267-4 09/08/2022 197.69 49752 Poe's Plumbing & Backflow Plumbing repairs City facilities 09/08/2022 990.29 49753 Pureserve Building Service Janitorial services 09/08/2022 21,141.35 49750 Monterey Sanitary Supply PW/FM janitorial supplies cleansers/COVID 09/08/2022 417.82 49751 Office Depot, Inc. PW/FM/Forestry - Office Supplies FY 2023 09/08/2022 539.12 49747 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Street Saver annual subscription 7/15/22 #4926-A 09/08/2022 2,000.00 49748 Mirage Window Cleaning Window cleaning service for City Facilites 09/08/2022 890.00 49745 Granite Rock Company PW Streets-Supplies 09/08/2022 57.74 49746 John Ley's Tree Service Tree work as directed by City Forester 09/08/2022 490.00 49742 Drought Resistant Nursery Plants for City - 8/2/22 #259434 09/08/2022 158.28 49744 Edges Electrical Group Electrical supplies for City Facilities 09/08/2022 227.20 49740 Coast Counties Glass, Inc. HML glass repalcement-6/6/22 #05452 09/08/2022 3,419.00 49741 De Lage Landen Financial PW Copier monthly lease- 09/08/2022 205.40 49738 Cate Electrical Co., Inc. Electrical work at City Facilities 09/08/2022 910.77 49739 Cintas Corporation PW Uniform Service 21/22 FY 09/08/2022 482.63 49736 Airtec Inc HVAC work for City Facilities 09/08/2022 1,295.56 49737 American Lock & Key Locksmith ervice for City Facilities 09/08/2022 215.89 49734 Granite Fire Protection, Inc Sunset Center cooling linework 08/21/22 #082122 09/08/2022 2,600.00 49735 Ailing House Pest Control City Wide Pest Control 09/08/2022 379.00 Department: 119 Public Works
49717 Cypress Painting & Decorating, Inc. Replace PO 2022000478-PW Exterior painting 09/02/2022 18,045.00 49891 Bound Tree Medical LLC Medical supplies 09/24/2022 2,023.18 Total 26,774.95
49872 De Lage Landen Financial Ambulance Copier lease 09/24/2022 71.01 49876 Medics For Life, Inc . EMT training and education services 09/24/2022 1,600.00 49820 Wittman Enterprises, LLC Ambulance billing service 09/09/2022 4,610.21 49821 Dr. James Stubblefield Medical director services Aug-Feb'23 (Re-issue C 09/12/2022 6,500.00 49808 Peninsula Welding & Medical Supply, inc. Ambulance Dept-Oxygen/hazardous materials tra 09/09/2022 179.83 49818 Verizon Wireless Machine to machine activity 09/09/2022 14.04 49781 Bound Tree Medical LLC Medical supplies 09/09/2022 1,454.62 49786 Carmel Towing & Garage Amb Dept gas expense (7166) 09/09/2022 1,740.53 Department: 118 Ambulance
49765 City Of Monterey FY 2022-23 Ambulance Administration fee 09/08/2022 8,581.53 49787 City Of Monterey FY 22-23 Fire Dept vehicle repairs 09/09/2022 4,894.29 Total 242,545.51
49777 Alhambra Water service Fire Dept 09/09/2022 199.55 49786 Carmel Towing & Garage Fire Dept gas expense (E15) 09/09/2022 831.46 Department: 117 Fire
49765 City Of Monterey FY 2022-23 Monthly fee:Interim Fire Admin/Emer 09/08/2022 236,620.21 Attachment 1 Total for Department: 411 Debt Service 77,899.79
Total for Fund:401 Debt Service 77,899.79
Grand Total 3,478,295.45
Fund: 401 Debt Service
Department: 411 Debt Service
49830 US BANK St. Paul Carmel Pub Imp Auth 2020 Debt service interest 09/13/2022 77,899.79 49818 Verizon Wireless 4 IPADS PBD 09/09/2022 1,219.62
Total 4,138.97
49738 Cate Electrical Co., Inc. Electrical upgrades to allow for stage rigging 8/5/ 09/08/2022 999.35 49743 Dudek MTNP Improvements 09/08/2022 1,920.00
Total 27,588.48
Fund: 301 Capital Projects
Department: 311 Capital Projects
49805 Pacific Gas & Electric 09/09/2022 282.56
49880 Pacific Gas & Electric Citywide gas & electric services 09/24/2022 15,073.44 Department: 130 Non-Departmental
49782 Cal-Am Water Company Water service citywide 09/09/2022 12,232.48 49900 Monterey County Convention & Visitors Bure Jurisdiction Investment Apr-Jun 2022 FY 21-22 Q 09/28/2022 40,001.75 Total 47,501.75
Total 7,249.73
Department: 122 Economic Revitalization
49824 Carmel Chamber of Commerce Visitor Center operations 50% Allocation FY 21-2 09/13/2022 7,500.00 49795 Good Roots Events, Inc. Farmers Market management FY 22-23 09/09/2022 6,700.00 49899 US Bank Sandcastle contest & Pumpkin Roll supplies 09/28/2022 490.90 Total 307.00
Department: 121 Community Activities
49733 US Bank Lunches for Homecrafters' Marketplace jury on Ju 09/08/2022 58.83 Total 87,032.13
Department: 120 Library
49806 Pacific Grove Self Storage Storage Unit - Document storage 09/09/2022 307.00 Attachment 1

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
November 1, 2022

CONSENT AGENDA
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Nova Romero, City Clerk
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
SUBJECT: September 2022 Monthly Reports
RECOMMENDATION:

Review and receive monthly reports.

BACKGROUND/SUMMARY:

This is a monthly series of reports:
1) City Administrator Contract Log
2) Community Planning and Building Department Reports
3) Police, Fire, and Ambulance Reports
4) Public Records Act Requests
5) Public Works Department Reports
FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A
PRIOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION:

Monthly review and approval.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1) City Administrator Contract Log
Attachment 2) Community Planning and Building Department Reports Attachment 3) Police, Fire, and Ambulance Reports
Attachment 4) Public Records Act Requests
Attachment 5) Public Works Department Reports
City Administrator Contract Log
FY 2022‐23
Date entered Into Contractor Contract Amount Purpose
9/1/2022 NICOLE NEDEFF BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING $24,000.00 On call biological consulting services Attachment 1

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
Monthly Report

Community Planning and Building Department
SEPTEMBER 2022 – DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
I. PLANNING PERMIT APPLICATIONS:

In September 2022, 37 planning permit applications were received.

II. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS:

In September 2022, 58 building permit applications were received.

III. CODE COMPLIANCE CASES:

In September 2022, 23 new code compliance cases were created.

IV. TRANSIENT RENTAL COMPLIANCE CASES:

In September 2022, 5 new code compliance cases were created.

V. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS:

In September 2022, 32 encroachment permit applications were received.

VI. YEAR-TO-DATE TRENDS
Table 1 includes the following September 2022 totals: planning and building permit applications, code compliance and transient rental compliance cases, and encroachments. September 2022 totals are provided alongside September 2021 totals for comparison.

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

SUBMITTED BY: Leah Young, Administrative Coordinator
SUBMITTED ON: November 1, 2022
APPROVED BY: Brandon Swanson, Director of Community Planning and Building Attachment 2
Compared to the same time period in the year 2021, Table 1 denotes the following percentage changes in the year 2022:
• Planning Permit Applications – increase of 11.07%
• Building Permit Applications – decrease of 2.48%
• Code Compliance Cases – increase of 125%
• Transient Rental Compliance Cases – increase of 933.33% • Encroachment Permit Applications – decrease of 6.64%
Table 1. Permit Application Totals PLANNING BUILDING CODE

COMPLIANCE

TRANSIENT
RENTAL

COMPLIANCE

ENCROACHMENTS
2021 Totals 271 404 84 3 226
2022 Totals 301 394 189 31 211
% Difference +11.07% -2.48% +125% +933.33% -6.64%
Attachment 2
Page: 1 of 5
Planning Permit Report
09/01/2022 - 09/30/2022
Permit # Permit Type Project Description Address/Location Date Received
Date
Approved
Status
22319 Design Review Revised approved BP 22-171 plans -
1) replace proposed window with new door
2) remove 493 sf of existing gravel driveway
3) add 17 sf of side stoop landing - stone
4) extend existing front landing step, adding 5 sf
Lobos St. 3 SE of
3rd Ave.
9/30/2022 In Review
22318 Historic
Evaluation
Initial historic determination Lobos Street 2
NE of 4th Avenue
9/27/2022 In Review
22317 Design Study CHANGES ORIGINALLY PROPOSED AS A REVISION TO BP 22-205, but Design Study must be completed first.

To add a new landscape stair and move the front door.

To re-use windows from the main house on the garage.

To remove the shed on the garage to make room for
the new stair, to reduce the impermeable area.

Camino Real and
4th Avenue
9/27/2022
22316 Temporary Use
Permit
Birthday Dinner for 15 Guests NW Corner of
6th & Mission
Street
9/30/2022 Approved
22315 Design Study 1. To remodel an existing one story single family dwelling, modify existing detached carport, and add a
second upper level. 2. Project includes the exterior and interior modifications as shown per the plans, and
converting the existing carport into a garage. 3. The
project will consist of changes to the rear decks, and
front porch entrance. 4. No excavation or tree removal.

Dolores Street 4
SW of 10th
Avenue
9/29/2022 In Review
22314 Design Study Proposed Window Changes to the Master Bathroom on the East and West Elevations.

San Antonio 2 NE
of 9th Ave.
9/29/2022 In Review
Page: 2 of 5
22313 Design Study Window changes on lower level, south elevation.

Replace the existing two windows with two windows of
more uniform size and style to match the rest of the
residence.

Guadalupe 5 SW
of Ocean Ave
9/29/2022 In Review
22312 Design Study Retroactive authorization for the installation of seven new Velux skylights.

Torres 4 NE of
3rd
9/29/2022 In Review
22311 Notice of Exempt
Work
Remove existing permeable flat stone at the front yard
setback and replace it with in-kind stone in the same
area. Contact: Alejandro Carderas (831) 998-0171
SW of Carmelo
and 4th
9/27/2022 9/28/2022 Approved
22310 Historic
Evaluation
HISTORIC EVALUATION: Relocation of the community
building.

Dolores 1 SE of
7th
9/27/2022 In Review
22309 Preliminary Site
Assessment
Request for Preliminary Site Assessment; also, see HE
22-169.

SW Corner of
Casanova and
11th
9/23/2022 Pending
Assignment
22308 Design Study Follow up to DS 20-264 & BP 21-061 (Linfesty).

PLANNING COMMISSION REFERRAL : Fiberglass Exterior
w/Paint Grade Wood Interior Windows to replace
existing fenestration. See attached order, elevations,
floor plans, window schedule, and manufacturer
information related to fiberglass exterior performance.

Order is on-site for Planning Commission Review.
4 Oak Knoll Way 9/23/2022 In Review
22307 Design Study Modify interior finishes to include new interior doors, flooring, cabinets, associated plumbing and
electrical. Replace existing exterior windows, skylights and siding to match existing. This work to be completed at Owners Suite and Kitchen only. The rest of the house is to remain as-is.

Scenic Road 3 SE
of 12th Ave
9/23/2022 In Review
22306 Design Study Exterior repair/restoration. Remove/replace P/L fence section. Relocate pedestrian gate. Replace driveway. No change in site coverage; no proposed new elevation.
7th & Camino
Real
9/22/2022 In Review
Page: 3 of 5
22305 Appeal ACTION/DECISION BEING APPEALED: Removal of established, healthy, drought-resistant trees and loss of homeowner privacy protection from public walkway
and pedestrian traffic.

APPELLANT: Kathleen Correia and Stephen Evans, PO
Box 933, Lafayette, CA 94549; 925-997-8330;
[email protected]
Right-of-way
fronting 4 North
San Antonio,
APN 010-241-
001
9/22/2022 In Review
22304 Planning Permit
Revision
FOLLOW UP TO DS 21-250 - (1) Change in materials
type approved on planning application #DS 21-250. (2)
Change in roofing material to CertainTeed Roofing MAX
DF Weathered Look. (3) Change in siding type to Hardie
Shingle Fiber Cement board. Shingles to be painted per
item 4. (4) Change color of the exterior body of the
house to Sherwin Williams, Alabaster.
9 Crespi SE of
Mountain View
9/22/2022 In Review
22303 Design Review Revision to Building Permit No. 220151: For the Northwest Building of Pine Inn Hotel, the As-Necessary
In-Kind Replacement of Any Existing Dry Rotted or
Damaged Wood Roof Sheathing Planks at Soffits,
Sculpted Roof Rafter Tails and Sculpted Roof Outrigger
Tails During the Re-Roofing Process per Architectural
and Structural Plans; Patch and Match Existing Stucco
Texture and Color as Required; Remove Existing NonHistoric Aluminum Covers in Space Above Existing Roof Outriggers and Install White Aluminum Bird Repellant
Spikes on Top of Roof Outrigger Beams.

Pine Inn Hotel :

Between Lincoln
St. and Monte
Verde St. and
Between 6th
Ave. and Ocean
Ave.
9/21/2022 In Review
22302 Design Study Follow up to a SWO posted for hot tub installation, slab and electrical.

SE Corner of
Palou and
Casanova
9/16/2022 In Review
22301 Design Review use the exisiting tile to fill in NE Junipero St and Fifth Ave
In Review
Page: 4 of 5
22300 Design Study This project consists of the Demolition of an existing non-historic two-story single family residential
structure, shed and detached garage. construction of
new two-story single family residence approximately
2,600 SF, with new single-car detached garage, new
detached 350 SF guest house, in-ground spa with
related terraces and site work.

Dolores St 3 NW
of 13th
9/14/2022 In Review
22299 Sign Interior design office sign permit 6th Ave. 2 NW of Dolores St., STE
11 9/14/2022 In Review
22298 Design Review One-story addition bedroom, bath, office, laundry. Santa Rita 5 NW Fourth
In Review
22297 Sign Installation of new awning sign for "Carmel's Hidden Gem".

Mission 3 NW of
5th
9/12/2022 Approved
22296 Sign Sign permit Lincoln 2 SW of
Ocean Ave - Unit
A
9/12/2022 In Review
22295 Design Review Authorizes replacing seven (7) existing metal framed windows on the 2nd floor (3 along alleyway, 4 fronting
San Carlos St) in the same footprint with Sierra Pacific brand aluminum clad windows with 5/8" contemporary
wood simulated divided lite.

San Carlos 2/3 SE
of 5th
9/9/2022 9/22/2022 Approved
22294 Historic
Evaluation
Historic ineligibility SW Corner of
Mission & 12th
9/1/2022 In Review
Page: 5 of 5
22293 Design Study This approval of Design Study (DS 22-293, Caplin) authorizes amendments to existing Design Study
Approvals (DS 19-364, DS 20-113, DS 22-144) for
alterations to an existing single-family residence located on Camino Real 5 SW 13th in the Single Family
Residential (R-1) District with an active building permit (BP 19-535). The modifications approved under this
Design Study include:

1. Material changes to the previously approved outdoor
fire pit. The revised pit shall be Solado Golde
Ledgestone to match the pavers on site. No changes to
the size, or location are authorized under this approval.

The project shall be consistent with the plans prepared by Jon Erlandson dated approved by Community
Planning & Building Department on September 23,
2022, unless modified by the conditions of approval
contained herein.

Camino Real 4
SW of 13th
9/2/2022 9/23/2022 Approved
22292 Preliminary Site
Assessment
164.00 s.f. dining room / kitchen addition. Bathroom
remodel to the guest house.

NW Corner of
Forest &
Mountain View
9/2/2022 In Review
22291 Design Review Tenant improvement for a new Retail store in an existing leased space, including storefront changes
facing the courtyard. Remodel of suites #217 and #219,
to be known as #217
Ocean Ave and
Mission St
In Review
22290 Sign 3 NW Corner of
San Carlos & 8th
9/1/2022 9/22/2022 Approved
Total Records: 30 10/6/2022
Page: 1 of 7
Building Permit Report
09/01/2022 - 09/30/2022
Permit # Date
Submitted
Date
Approved
Project Description Valuation Permit Type Property Location 220394 10/3/2022 Install wheel chair lift for owner under Reasonable Accomodation.
30,000 Building 4th 2 NE of Monte Verde
220393 9/29/2022 10/3/2022 Exterior painting of residence, carport and fence in-kind. Contact: Detailed Finish Painting (831)
975-1104
0 Exempt Work Monte Verde 3 NW of 3rd
220392 9/29/2022 Lighting changes in 382 sf of 1480sf tenant space in (e) commercial building.
10,000 Electrical NW Corner of Ocean &
Lincoln
220391 9/29/2022 Roof mounted solar pv 5 kW system using 13 LG380 Panels.
24,627 Electrical Lopez 5 Nw Of 4th
220390 9/27/2022 9/27/2022 Reroute 3/4" galvanized gas line from the meter to under house tie onto existing 3/4" line.

Eliminate and cap off line for old abandoned floor
furnace. Contact: A & R Plumbing (831) 394-7221
2,000 Plumbing SW Corner of Perry
Newberry & 5th
220389 9/27/2022 Repaint (e) house, garage & deck using Kelly More "Yin Mist" paint color. Contact: Matt McNickle
(831) 594-8232
0 Exempt Work San Antonio 3 SE of 11th
220388 9/26/2022 Demolition of rear attached structure, demolition of garage, construction of new garage, new bay
window, new kitchen, two new bedrooms and
bath at second floor.
300,000 Building Escolle 2 SE of Perry
Newberry
220387 9/26/2022 Addition of a drain filed to prevent water infiltration into the basement. Contact: MAS
Construction (831) 214-2965
10,000 Building San Antonio 3 SE of 8th
220386 9/26/2022 9/26/2022 Replacement of impervious carmel stone pathway with new impervious idaho stone pathway.

Contact: Kathleen Michaels (831) 622-9826
0 Exempt Work Mission 7 NW of Santa
Lucia
Page: 2 of 7
220385 9/26/2022 9/26/2022 Paint entire exterior of home. Home is currently a blueish/gray color. New exterior paint color to be
dark grey and white trim. Contact: Icon Building &
Development (831) 920-6007
0 Exempt Work NW Corner of Casanova &
Fraser
220384 9/26/2022 9/26/2022 Remove (e) wood shake roof, replace with new Presidential TL roofing system in color Shadow
Gray. Contact: Salinas Valley Roofing (831) 757-
9400
18,950 Roofing Santa Rita 5 SW of 2nd
220383 9/26/2022 9/26/2022 Renovation of lower interior area, apply new hardwood floors, can lights & sheet rock. Contact:

Saroyan Master Builder (831) 393-1800
3,500 Electrical Guadalupe 4 NE of 5th
220382 9/26/2022 9/27/2022 Install PV system - 16 Solaria PowerXT-400R panels/16 Enphase IQ8Plus microinverters.
27,450 Electrical Monte Verde 2 NE Santa
Lucia
220381 9/22/2022 9/22/2022 Replace the (e) water heater with a new BradfordWhite 75 gallon water heater. Contact: Rooter King (831) 394-5315
1,700 Plumbing SW Corner of Lincoln & 7th
220380 9/21/2022 9/26/2022 Replace and repair rotted fence along north boundary to garage (6' high), along southern
boundary replace 6' redwood fence to within 15'
of property corner, continue with 4' redwood
fence to property boundary. Repair east setback
(front) fence as possible, when not possible
replace with fence no more than 4' high. Contact:

Bay View Building Services (831) 394-3645
0 Exempt Work Monte Verde 2 NW of 6th
220379 9/21/2022 Significant remodel of interior and exterior of structure with no landscaping/site changes.
500,000 Building NW Corner of Monte Verde
& Santa Lucia
220378 9/21/2022 Bathroom remodel 30,000 Building Monterey 3 SW of 1st 220377 9/21/2022 9/22/2022 Installation of a new shower. Contact: Chris Miller (831) 601-3776
4,000 Plumbing Forest 3 SW of 7th
220376 9/21/2022 Level dirt mound are in rear of property. Protect oak tree in corner of yard. Replace rear fence, to
be no taller than 6'.
0 Exempt Work Lobos 5 SE of 2nd
Page: 3 of 7
220375 9/20/2022 9/20/2022 Paint interior of residence, replace five interior doors, replace bathroom vanity cabinets in two
bathrooms with no changes to plumbing, repair
hand railing at front porch. Contact: Sheree
Hanson (408) 823-2396
0 Exempt Work Lobos 5 SE of 2nd
220374 9/20/2022 9/20/2022 Removal of flooring and installation of new floor.

Contact: The Floor Store (916) 430-9012
0 Exempt Work Lobos 5 SE of 2nd
220373 9/20/2022 Installation of new 7.6KW PV (19) module rooftop mounted system. Contact: Sunrun Installation
Services (408) 506-3693
14,440 Electrical SW Corner of Carpenter &
3rd
220372 9/20/2022 9/23/2022 Master bathroom work, replace tub with shower, tile shower area and bathroom floor, add shelving.

Contact: Christopher Andrade (831) 601-3653
7,000 Building San Carlos 2 SE of 10th
220371 9/20/2022 9/21/2022 Residential demolition of deck, sunporch, garage, and portions of main residence. Contact: Hermina
Dallas (831) 293-4052
2,800 Demolition NW Corner of San Carlos &
12th
220370 Revision to Permit No. 220151: For the
Northwest Building of Pine Inn Hotel, the AsNecessary In-Kind Replacement of Any Existing Dry Rotted or Damaged Wood Roof Sheathing
Planks at Soffits, Sculpted Roof Rafter Tails and
Sculpted Roof Outrigger Tails per Architectural
and Structural Plans; Patch and Match Existing
Stucco Texture and Color as Required.
500 BP Revision Pine Inn Hotel: Between
Lincoln St. and Monte
Verde St. and Between 6th
Ave. and Ocean Ave.
220369 9/19/2022 Demo existing non-permeable brick patio surface and replace with permeable stone surface.

Contact: Stocker & Allaire (831) 375-1890
0 Exempt Work NE Corner of Lincoln & 10th
220368 9/19/2022 9/19/2022 Change 100 amp service to 200 amp service.

Contact: Craft Electric Co, Inc. (831) 915-3488
3,500 Electrical 5th 2 NE of Perry Newberry
Page: 4 of 7
220367 9/19/2022 9/19/2022 Replacement of 4 windows with 4 all new windows to match all others used in previous
renovation. Utilizing same window manufacturer,
style, and material (wood). Contact: Javier Ortiz
(831) 905-8042
0 Exempt Work Lincoln 2 NW of 12th
220366 9/19/2022 9/19/2022 Placement of a POD on private property from 9/23/22 - 10/23/22
0 Exempt Work SE Corner of Santa Fe & 5th
220365 9/16/2022 9/16/2022 Addition of 120V receptacle in attic for outdoor cameras. Contact: Cate Electrical Company (831)
624-5361
2,535 Electrical 6th 2 SW of Carpenter
220364 9/15/2022 9/16/2022 Return white windows to the original brown color.

Restoration of full wall to be authorized when
original paint color samples are received. Contact:

Will Bullock (831) 277-8952
0 Exempt Work NW Corner of San Carlos &
6th
220363 9/15/2022 9/15/2022 Replace (e) bathroom vanity and counter top.

Contact: JL DiBenedetto (831) 277-0052
0 Exempt Work San Antonio 5 SE of 2nd
220362 9/16/2022 Voluntary repair of two horizontal cracks in existing stemwall foundation, no remodeling, no
change in footprint.
16,674 Building Dolores 2 SE of 9th
220361 9/15/2022 Interior remodel. Replace all Electrical and Lighting. Install Fire Sprinklers. Demo 92 SF of
Mezzanine. Reconfigure Stairs to Upper Floor.
325,000 Building Fraser Way 2 NE of Camino
Real
220360 9/15/2022 10/4/2022 Install PV solar and battery backup, upgrade main panel to 200 amp.
40,000 Electrical Lincoln 3 NW of 3rd
220359 9/13/2022 Installation of new hot tub, decking, and garden walls. Contact: Garden Solutions Landscaping
(831) 224-4006
4,300 Building 2905 Franciscan Way
220358 9/13/2022 Install a 5KW roof mounted solar system. Contact:

William Drew (831) 402-7583
25,642 Electrical 26185 Dolores
220357 9/13/2022 9/14/2022 Remove (e) wood shakes and replace with new 3/4" premium heavy cedar shakes (Teal Johns
Group t0 year, color: wood). Contact: Premo
Roofing Company (831) 443-3605
45,000 Roofing Carmelo 5 SW of 4th
Page: 5 of 7
220356 9/13/2022 9/13/2022 Remove and replace kitchen countertop and backsplash. Contact: Russ Campbell (831) 625-
3497
0 Exempt Work NE Corner of San Antonio &
7th
220355 9/12/2022 Conversion of second-floor office spaces to three apartments. No work to first floor commercial
spaces.
95,000 Building San Carlos 2 NW of 8th
220354 9/12/2022 Modify A.W. Shucks restrooms to comply with ADA requirements. Add new accessible unisex
restroom to tenant restrooms.
40,000 Building Ocean 2 SW of San Carlos
220353 9/12/2022 9/20/2022 Tear off existing wood shake roof down to original skip sheathing and haul away for proper disposal.

Install one layer of Polyglass Polystick XFR selfadhered high temp membrane at all roof penetrations. Install one layer of fire rated 72lb
mineral surface cap sheet membrane over roof
deck. Provide and install class A fire-rated CeDur
Multi Width Synthetic shakes interlaced with 22”
felt. All synthetic shakes will be installed in a
straight-course pattern at 10” exposure to the
weather. The color of the shakes will be Walden.

Contact: Scudder Roofing (831) 384-1500
137,610 Roofing Torres 9 SW of 10th
220352 9/12/2022 9/12/2022 Correct wiring in the laundry room. Contact: Pars Power (510) 681-3452
1,050 Electrical 25962 Mission
220351 9/12/2022 9/21/2022 Install a roof mounted 5.10kW solar PV system of 12 panels. No main service panel upgrade to be
performed, no storage batteries. Contact:

SolarTecture (831) 233-3004
10,000 Electrical Dolores 5 SE of 13th
220350 9/9/2022 9/20/2022 Painting of office and installation of new carpet.

Contact: Diego Reyes (831) 206-3947
0 Exempt Work NW Corner of San Carlos &
8th #2
220349 9/8/2022 9/9/2022 Remodel of closet space. Contact: Defersol Building (831) 601-6768.
1,500 Building San Carlos 2 NE of 12th
220348 9/8/2022 Single story addition of 153.25sf and interior remodel. Contact: Denee Berliner (415) 235-6142
145,000 Building Guadalupe 2 NE of 3rd
Page: 6 of 7
220347 9/8/2022 9/8/2022 Removal of 2 lf of drywall and insulation around perimeter of cottage and removal of laminate
flooring. Contact: Monterey Peninsula Restoration
LLC (831) 275-1901
7,500 Building Carmelo 2 NW of 10th
220346 9/7/2022 9/8/2022 Remove bondo, repair, paint, and replace windows in existing locations. Contact: Handy Dan
Construction (831) 643-9911
0 Exempt Work Dolores 2 SE of 1st
220345 9/7/2022 9/29/2022 Remove/Replace (2) 5 Ton Split Systems With Like-For-Like Split Systems. Contact: Mesa Energy
Systems (559) 277-7900
89,000 Mechanical San Carlos 2 SE of Ocean
220344 9/7/2022 9/7/2022 Repair & replace gas pipes in laundry room.

Contact: Chris Wilson Plumbing & Heating (831)
393-9321
904 Plumbing 25962 Mission Street
220343 9/7/2022 9/7/2022 Remove & replace water heater. Install 50 gallon BRG250T6N394. Contact: A&R Plumbing (831)
394-7221
2,800 Plumbing 2nd 2 SE of San Carlos
220342 9/7/2022 Demolition and construction to redemise three tenant spaces into two tenant spaces, to include
replacement in-kind of existing mechanical
equipment, relocation electrical and plumbing
service. No change in use or zoning. no structural
in scope.
161,076 Building SW Corner of Ocean &
Junipero
220341 9/7/2022 9/7/2022 Tear off (e) wood shake roof system. Install new self-adhered waterproof membrane at all roof
penetrations. Install one layer of eco-chief
solarhide synthetic underlayment. Install 4400 sf
of new class "A" fire rated DaVinci single-width
synthetic slate in the color "Brownstone".

Contact: Scudder Roofing (831) 384-1500
161,926 Roofing NE Corner of Mission &
Santa Lucia
220340 9/7/2022 10/3/2022 KITCHEN/BATHROOM TILES REPLACEMENT,

CHANGE BATHTUB TO SHOWER, REPLACE DRAIN
PIPES FROM KITCHEN TO MAIN SEWER. Contact:

Amir Salehi (408) 219-2276
3,500 Plumbing Monte Verde 2 NW of 8th
Page: 7 of 7
220339 9/2/2022 9/19/2022 New roof mount PV 8 mods, 3.48 kW, new 200A subpanel, new 200A Gateway.
35,721 Electrical SW Corner of Casanova &
10th
220338 9/1/2022 Replacement of old weathered windows that is falling apart with a new "like for like" window.
0 Exempt Work Ocean 3 SE of Monte Verde
220337 9/1/2022 9/19/2022 ESS: 1 new tesla powerwall 5 kW. Contact:

Scudder Solar (916) 765-2113
14,100 Electrical Casanova 4 NE 13th
Total Records: 58 10/6/2022
Page: 1 of 2
Code Compliance Report
09/01/2022 - 09/30/2022
Case # Case Type: Status Location Problem Description Date Received
Date Closed
22189 Planning Violation Open Torres 4 NE 6th Stone Pavers w/o design review 9/30/2022 22188 Planning Violation Open Palou 2 SW 2nd Tall Fence Correction Required 9/13/2022 22187 Public Nuisance Closed Santa Fe 2 NE 6th Unkempt Worksite/SWM 9/25/2022 9/29/2022 22186 Property Maintenance Closed Santa Rita 3 NE of 3rd Construction debris in front yard 9/25/2022 9/29/2022 22185 Right of way Violation Open NW Corner Santa Fe and 3rd
multiple lease signs in ROW 9/24/2022
22184 Short-term Rental Closed Santa Fe 2 SE of 5th STR 9/25/2022 9/26/2022 22183 Short-term Rental 1st NOV sent SE Corner of 2nd and N San Antonio
STR 9/25/2022
22182 Building Violation Open San Carlos 2 SE of 10th Unpermitted alterations requiring building permit
(Bathroom Remodel)
9/19/2022
22181 Right of way Violation Closed Guadalupe 2 NW 4th Material/Dumpster in ROW 9/13/2022 9/20/2022 22180 Business License Violation Open Ocean SE of Monte Verde
No business sign 9/9/2022
22179 Right of way Violation Closed Lincoln S of Ocean Control of Public ROW 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 22178
22177 Short-term Rental 1st NOV sent Santa Fe 2 SE of 4th STR 9/10/2022 22176 Short-term Rental 1st NOV sent SE Corner Lobos and 3rd STR 9/10/2022 22175 Short-term Rental 1st NOV sent Junipero 3 SE of 2nd STR 9/10/2022 22174
22173 Right of way Violation Open NE Corner Santa Fe and 4th
Gravel in ROW 9/9/2022
Page: 2 of 2
22172 Business License Violation 1st NOV sent Mission 2 NE 5th exceeding hours of operations 9/9/2022 22171 Building Violation Open Torres 4 NE of 3rd Exceeded scope of work by cutting in @ 9 new skylights
8/25/2022
22170 Planning Violation Open Oak Koll 4 NE of Forest Exceeded Scope of BP 21-061 Requiring Planning Approval
8/25/2022
22169 Skin Care Complaint Open Ocean NE of Dolores Soliciting in sidewalk 9/7/2022 22168 Right of way Violation Open San Carlos 3 NE of 6th Dump truck parked on sidewalk 9/7/2022 22162 Right of way Violation Open Carmelo 4 NW Ocean Speed bumps w/o encroachment permit
9/1/2022
Total Records: 23 10/6/2022
Transient Rental Report
01/01/2022 - 09/30/2022
Case # Street Status Date Received Last Status Date Date Closed 22184 Santa Fe Closed 9/25/2022 9/25/2022 9/26/2022
22183 San Antonio 1st NOV sent 9/25/2022 9/25/2022
22177 Santa Fe 1st NOV sent 9/10/2022 9/11/2022
22176 Lobos 1st NOV sent 9/10/2022 9/10/2022
22175 Junipero 1st NOV sent 9/10/2022 9/10/2022
22167 Mountain View 1st NOV sent 8/30/2022 8/30/2022
22164 San Carlos 2nd NOV sent 8/25/2022 9/29/2022
22163 Monte Verde Closed 8/17/2022 9/6/2022 9/6/2022
22151 Forest Closed 7/21/2022 8/30/2022 8/30/2022
22146 Carmelo Closed 7/20/2022 9/14/2022 9/14/2022
22138 Casanova Closed 7/5/2022 7/5/2022 9/2/2022
22134 Junipero Closed 6/28/2022 8/3/2022 8/3/2022
22133 Junipero Closed 6/27/2022 7/1/2022 8/3/2022
22132 Valley Way Closed 6/24/2022 7/5/2022 7/5/2022
22103 Dolores Closed 5/24/2022 5/26/2022 5/26/2022
22098 Santa Rita Closed 5/25/2022 7/20/2022 7/20/2022
22097 Carmelo Closed 5/22/2022 6/21/2022 6/21/2022
22096 Mission Closed 5/22/2022 7/5/2022 7/5/2022
22091 Junipero Closed 5/15/2022 6/21/2022 6/21/2022
22090 Dolores Closed 5/15/2022 7/6/2022 7/6/2022
22070 Junipero Closed 4/12/2022 6/24/2022 6/24/2022
22068 N Carmelo Closed 4/6/2022 5/3/2022 5/3/2022
22067 N San Antonio Closed 4/5/2022 5/10/2022 5/10/2022 22063 Carmelo Closed 3/22/2022 5/15/2022 5/15/2022
22062 Casanova Closed 3/17/2022 3/17/2022 4/20/2022
22042 San Carlos Closed 2/22/2022 4/5/2022 4/5/2022
22039 Ocean Closed 2/15/2022 4/4/2022 4/4/2022
22033 Dolores Closed 2/10/2022 2/10/2022 2/10/2022
22024 Dolores Closed 2/3/2022 2/10/2022 2/11/2022
22013 Junipero Closed 2/1/2022 4/11/2022 4/11/2022
22007 Lopez Closed 1/11/2022 3/15/2022 3/15/2022
Total Records: 31
10/5/2022
Page: 1 of 4
Encroachment Permit Report
09/01/2022 - 09/30/2022
Permit # Permit Type Date
Submitted
Project Description Property
Location
Date Issued Status
220213 Temp Ench 9/28/2022 11'x16' asphalt patch for Cal Am Job #0621. Contact:

Coastal Paving & Excavating (831) 262-1425
SW Corner of
Torres & 3rd
9/29/2022 Issued
220212 Temp Ench 9/27/2022 Setup traffic control to access (e) AT&T structures for fiber placement - no excavation required. AT&T Job# A02FRZY.

Contact: AT&T (408) 807-3662
Monte Verde
from Ocean to
7th
9/27/2022 Issued
220211 Temp Ench 9/26/2022 Replace sewer lateral using pipe bursting. Contact: Rooter King (831) 394-5315
San Carlos 2 NW
of 8th
10/3/2022 Issued
220210 Temp Ench 9/26/2022 Replace sewer lateral using pipe bursting. Contact: Rooter King (831) 394-5315
1st 2 NE of
Carpenter
9/26/2022 Issued
220209 Temp Ench 9/26/2022 PG&E to trench & backfill all (5'x5' bellhole and 41' trench in franchise to property line), and installation of new gas service. PM# 35366891. Contact: PG&E (408) 478-1894
NE Corner of
San Antonio &
13th
9/26/2022 Issued
220208 Temp Ench 9/20/2022 Replace sewer lateral using pipe bursting. Contact: Rooter King (831) 394-5315
Carpenter 3 SW
of 3rd
9/20/2022 Issued
220207 Temp Ench 9/20/2022 Replace sewer lateral using pipe bursting. Contact: Rooter King (831) 394-5315
SW Corner of
Perry Newberry
& 5th
9/20/2022 Issued
220206 Temp Ench 9/20/2022 Lid and frame replacement for in-street cover. PM# 45453643. Contact: PG&E (831) 713-6019
4th 3 SE of
Mission
9/20/2022 Issued
220205 Temp Ench 9/19/2022 Sewer lateral replacement from house to street. Contact:

A Ramirez Plumbing (831) 809-4707
Dolores 4 SE of
9th
10/3/2022 Issued
220204 Temp Ench 9/19/2022 Replace sewer lateral from front of the building to City main, approx 25'. Contact: Edgar's Plumbing (831) 601-
5557
San Carlos 3 NW
of 6th
9/21/2022 Issued
Page: 2 of 4
220203 Driveway 9/16/2022 Replace (e) asphalt driveway with (n) gray decomposed granite driveway. Install steel edging along open side of driveway to contain d.g. Proposed to be the same size and width. Contact: Samuel Pitnick Architects, Inc. (831) 241- 1895
San Antonio 3 SE
of 11th
In Review
220202 Temp Ench 9/16/2022 Replace sewer lateral using pipe bursting. Contact: Rooter King (831) 394-5315
4th 3 NE of
Monte Verde
9/19/2022 Closed
220201 Temp Ench 9/15/2022 3'x3' asphalt patch for CalAm. Contact: Coastal Paving & Excavating (831) 262-1425
NE Corner of
Lobos & 4th
9/29/2022 Issued
220200 Temp Ench 9/15/2022 Proposing to access one (e) vault and install two 2" HDPE conduits by open trench, approx 10lf within private
property to convey FO service. Contact: Quanta Teletcom (470) 626-3989
SE Corner of
Dolores & 5th
9/20/2022 Issued
220199 Temp Ench 9/15/2022 Temporary placement of debris bin during remodel.

Contact: Todd Fujinaga (925) 785-3779
Guadalupe 2
NW of 4th
9/20/2022 In Review
220198 Driveway 9/15/2022 Replacement of 35'x12' asphalt driveway with new asphalt driveway. Contact: Rick Tucci (408) 646-2131
NW Corner of
San Carlos &
13th
In Review
220197 Temp Ench 9/13/2022 Replace sewer lateral using pipe bursting. Contact: Rooter King (831) 394-5315
Camino Real 3
SW of 4th
9/14/2022 Issued
220196 Temp Ench 9/12/2022 Installation of temporary speed bumps in road for use during construction hours. Contact: Level 5 Construction (831) 682-5381
Carmelo 4 NW
of Ocean
In Review
220195 Temp Ench 9/12/2022 Replace sewer lateral using pipe bursting. Contact: Rooter King (831) 394-5315
3rd 2 NW of
Junipero
9/13/2022 Issued
220194 Temp Ench 9/9/2022 PG&E to replace rotten pole at Location 1. PM# 35365157.

Contact: PG&E (831) 713-6019
SE Corner of
Casanova & 2nd
9/13/2022 Issued
220193 Temp Ench 9/9/2022 Replace full sewer lateral with trenchless system. Open 4'x4' bellhole to access line. Contact: Edgars Plumbing (831) 601-55557
Camino Real 2
SE of 11th
9/13/2022 Issued
220192 Temp Ench 9/9/2022 PG&E to install anchor and replace crossarm (overhead electrical maintenance). Contact: PG&E (408) 478-1894
SE Corner of 2nd
& N. Casanova
In Review
Page: 3 of 4
220191 Temp Ench 9/9/2022 Replacement of 4" cast iron pipe with 4" abs pipe. Contact:

Hawk Plumbing (831) 277-8408
NW Corner of
Torres & 3rd
9/14/2022 Issued
220190 Temp Ench 9/8/2022 Replace sewer lateral from house to City main using trenchless system. Excavate 5x5x bell hole, backfill per city does after inspection. Replace asphalt with hot mix.

CONDITION: FLAGGERS ARE REQUIRED ALONG SAN
ANTONIO. PUBLIC WORKS REQUIRED TO BE ON SITE ONCE
TRAFFIC CONTROL HAS BEEN SET UP. Contact: ACME
Plumbing (831) 422-2311
5 Sand & Sea 9/13/2022 Issued
220189 Temp Ench 9/8/2022 Loading of roofing material onto roof. CONDITION:

SIDEWALK CLOSED AHEAD/CROSS HERE SIGNS ARE
REQUIRED AT THE CORNERS OF SAN CARLOS AT 5TH &
6TH. Contact: Premo Roofing (831) 443-3605
San Carlos 3 NE
of 6th
9/13/2022 Issued
220188 Temp Ench 9/8/2022 Storage of flooring materials in tour bus parking area.

Contact: Justin Wagner (916) 407-4988
Carmel Plaza Denied
220187 POD 9/8/2022 Placement of a 8x8x12 POD in driveway from 9/12/22 - 9/22/22 for the purpose of moving. Contact: Johnny Black (831) 622-8313
5th 2 NW of San
Carlos
9/8/2022 Issued
220186 Temp Ench 9/7/2022 Replace sewer lateral using pipe bursting. Contact: Rooter King (831) 394-5315
Monterey 3 SW
of 2nd
9/7/2022 Issued
220185 Temp Ench 9/7/2022 Replace 30' of 4" sewer line at the street. New ABS pipe from clean out to CAWD main to get rid of low sagging
pipe. New wye, clean out, and backwater valve. Contcat:

Chris Wilson Plumbing (831) 393-9321
Carmelo 2 NW
of 10th
9/7/2022 Issued
220184 Temp Ench 9/2/2022 Replacde approx 60ft of sewer lateral with 30ft of trenched 4" ABS Pipe and 30ft of 4" Trenchless SDR Pipe from two openings. One 2x3 opening on property at a
depth of 2ft and a 4x5ft Opening in the street at a depth of 2ft. Install 2 way clean out and sewer back water valve and sewer popper.
4802 monterey
st.
9/7/2022 Issued
220183 Temp Ench 9/1/2022 Replace full sewer lateral with trenchless system. Open 4'x4' square at street to expose City main sewer line.

Contact: Edgars Plumbing (831) 601-5557
Camino Real 2
SE of 11th
In Review
Page: 4 of 4
220182 Temp Ench 9/1/2022 Replace sewer lateral using pipe bursting. Contact: Rooter King (831) 394-5315
Lincoln 4 NE of
7th
9/7/2022 Issued
Total Records: 32 10/6/2022

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
Monthly Report
September 2022
Meeting Date: 11-1-2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Alan Ward, Public Safety Director
SUBMITTED DATE: October 17, 2022
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator

AMBULANCE REPORT
Summary of Carmel Fire Ambulance August Calls for Service

AMBULANCE PERFORMANCE MEASURE
The performance goal for Code-3 (life threatening emergency-lights & siren) ambulance calls in the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea with a response time of 5 minutes or less from dispatch to arrival is 95%. For the month of September 2022 the ambulance did not meet the performance measure. The response time was 93.54% with (3) code-3 calls over 5 minutes.
33 Calls for service in CBTS Average response time: 3:10 min. 31 Code 3 calls for service –Two calls were over 5:00 min. with a 3:02 min average response. 09/26/22; 1:40 am; (5:06 min); Carmelo/ 4th (Early morning response) 09/27/22; 1:51 am; (5:47 min); Camino Real/ 13th (Early morning response)

MONTEREY FIRE REPORT
Summary of Monterey Fire August Calls for Service

FIRE PERFORMANCE MEASURE
The performance goal for Code-3 (life threatening emergency-lights & siren) fire calls with a response time of 5 minutes or less from dispatch to arrival is 95%. For the month of September 2022 the fire department met the performance measure. The response time was 95% with (3) code-3 calls over 5 minutes.
72 total calls for service in CBTS Average response time: 3:13 min. 61 total Code-3 calls – There were 3 responses over 5:00 min.

BEACH FIRES
There were 5 illegal beach fires recorded during the month of September 2022.

Attachment 3
Incident Alarm Date Incident Number Response
Time Combined Address Cross Street Priority
100 Series (Fires)
Special outside fire, other 9/7/2022 8:22 PM 220907-MNT06211 0:02:19 DOLORES ST 5TH AVE 3 1 0:02:19
300-321 Series (EMS)
Medical assist, assist EMS crew 9/1/2022 8:58 PM 220901-MNT06048 0:02:30 MONTE VERDE ST OCEAN AVE 3 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 9/8/2022 8:14 AM 220908-MNT06226 0:03:40 OCEAN AVE MONTE VERDE ST 3 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 9/8/2022 2:41 PM 220908-MNT06237 0:05:06 SCENIC RD 11TH AVE 3 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 9/18/2022 2:59 AM 220918-MNT06506 0:04:30 S MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE 8TH AVE 3 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 9/19/2022 9:38 AM 220919-MNT06548 0:03:13 TORRES ST 2ND AVE 3 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 9/19/2022 1:06 PM 220919-MNT06554 0:03:03 OCEAN AVE SAN ANTONIO AVE 3 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 9/19/2022 2:09 PM 220919-MNT06556 0:02:45 CARMELO ST OCEAN AVE 3 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 9/19/2022 4:14 PM 220919-MNT06564 0:01:40 MISSION ST 7TH AVE 3 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 9/20/2022 1:34 PM 220920-MNT06588 0:02:11 SAN CARLOS ST OCEAN AVE 3 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 9/24/2022 6:10 PM 220924-MNT06689 0:08:25 DOLORES ST OCEAN AVE 2 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 9/25/2022 10:01 AM 220925-MNT06708 0:02:27 DOLORES ST 5TH AVE 3 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 9/26/2022 12:28 AM 220926-MNT06717 0:04:05 CARMELO ST 4TH AVE 3 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 9/27/2022 12:39 AM 220927-MNT06743 0:05:00 CAMINO REAL ST 13TH AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/3/2022 5:11 PM 220903-MNT06092 0:02:47 8TH AVE DOLORES ST 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/5/2022 2:40 PM 220905-MNT06155 0:02:04 MISSION ST 7TH AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/6/2022 2:20 PM 220906-MNT06183 0:01:31 SAN CARLOS ST 7TH AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/8/2022 1:21 PM 220908-MNT06233 0:03:10 8TH AVE TORRES ST 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/10/2022 6:07 PM 220910-MNT06300 0:01:29 OCEAN AVE DOLORES ST 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/10/2022 8:41 PM 220910-MNT06305 0:02:44 S MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE SANTA RITA ST 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/12/2022 12:28 AM 220912-MNT06332 0:03:11 OCEAN AVE MISSION ST 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/14/2022 4:40 PM 220914-MNT06397 0:02:21 8TH AVE SAN CARLOS ST 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/15/2022 10:49 AM 220915-MNT06420 0:03:08 DOLORES ST 13TH AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/16/2022 9:51 AM 220916-MNT06451 0:02:52 SAN CARLOS ST 7TH AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/17/2022 7:32 AM 220917-MNT06485 0:03:17 JUNIPERO AVE 4TH AVE 2 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/17/2022 12:00 PM 220917-MNT06491 0:02:36 SANTA RITA ST 5TH AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/17/2022 2:24 PM 220917-MNT06494 0:02:51 MONTE VERDE ST 9TH AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/17/2022 9:46 PM 220917-MNT06502 0:02:30 DOLORES ST OCEAN AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/18/2022 10:17 PM 220918-MNT06538 0:03:39 LINCOLN ST 7TH AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/21/2022 7:35 AM 220921-MNT06604 0:03:37 TORRES ST 2ND AVE 3

RESPONSE SUMMARY REPORT BY INCIDENT TYPE
27060 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
Alarm Date From: 9/1/2022 To: 9/30/2022
22 09 Carmel Fire Activity Report.xlsx 1
Incident Alarm Date Incident Number Response
Time Combined Address Cross Street Priority
EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/21/2022 2:11 PM 220921-MNT06615 0:04:15 DOLORES ST 5TH AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/21/2022 2:45 PM 220921-MNT06617 0:01:27 JUNIPERO AVE 4TH AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/21/2022 9:50 PM 220921-MNT06624 0:05:45 CASANOVA ST SANTA LUCIA AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/22/2022 1:53 AM 220922-MNT06627 0:02:24 DOLORES ST 12TH AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/23/2022 1:42 PM 220923-MNT06659 0:02:51 LINCOLN ST 7TH AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/23/2022 8:54 PM 220923-MNT06666 0:03:49 13TH AVE CASANOVA ST 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/24/2022 9:54 AM 220924-MNT06676 0:03:37 SAN ANTONIO AVE 10TH AVE 3 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 9/29/2022 7:54 PM 220929-MNT06812 0:03:15 13TH AVE CASANOVA ST 3 Search for person on land 9/22/2022 12:40 AM 220922-MNT06626 0:00:00 11TH AVE SAN CARLOS ST 2 38 0:03:09
400 Series (Hazardous Material)
Overheated motor 9/13/2022 7:01 PM 220913-MNT06375 0:03:03 SAN CARLOS ST 9TH AVE 3 Power line down 9/8/2022 3:37 PM 220908-MNT06242 0:02:38 SAN CARLOS ST 1ST AVE 3 2 0:02:51
500 & 600 Series (Service Calls)
Lock-out 9/2/2022 12:53 PM 220902-MNT06062 0:04:07 CARMELO ST 4NW OF 12TH 2 Water problem, other 9/17/2022 6:21 PM 220917-MNT06499 0:02:49 CASANOVA ST 8TH AVE 3 Water or steam leak 9/13/2022 1:45 PM 220913-MNT06366 0:04:25 7TH AVE 7TH PL 2 Smoke or odor removal 9/13/2022 1:18 PM 220913-MNT06363 0:01:18 DOLORES ST OCEAN AVE 2 Public service assistance, other 9/19/2022 7:22 PM 220919-MNT06572 0:04:32 SAN CARLOS ST 4TH AVE 3 Police matter 9/2/2022 10:49 AM 220902-MNT06056 0:03:26 MISSION ST OCEAN AVE 3 Police matter 9/14/2022 9:24 PM 220914-MNT06403 0:02:46 SANTA FE ST 6TH AVE 3 Public service 9/1/2022 1:34 PM 220901-MNT06037 0:01:02 8TH AVE LINCOLN ST 3 Public service 9/2/2022 12:18 PM 220902-MNT06059 0:04:30 CASANOVA ST 2NW OF 12TH AVE 3 Public service 9/13/2022 4:08 PM 220913-MNT06369 0:02:20 JUNIPERO AVE 4TH AVE 3 Assist invalid 9/4/2022 10:31 AM 220904-MNT06114 0:06:23 DOLORES ST 1ST AVE 2 Assist invalid 9/14/2022 10:16 AM 220914-MNT06384 0:00:00 SAN CARLOS ST 8TH AVE 2 Assist invalid 9/15/2022 3:53 PM 220915-MNT06431 0:06:23 DOLORES ST 13TH AVE 2 Assist invalid 9/21/2022 1:57 PM 220921-MNT06612 0:04:14 JUNIPERO AVE VISTA AVE 2 Assist invalid 9/27/2022 5:51 PM 220927-MNT06761 0:04:04 CASANOVA ST 8TH AVE 2 Dispatched & canceled en route 9/4/2022 1:12 PM 220904-MNT06121 0:03:00 2 PINE RIDGE RD 3 Dispatched & canceled en route 9/29/2022 12:03 PM 220929-MNT06798 0:02:24 4TH AVE JUNIPERO AVE 3 No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 9/3/2022 5:30 PM 220903-MNT06094 0:04:49 SCENIC RD 11TH AVE 3 No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 9/4/2022 5:35 PM 220904-MNT06132 0:02:50 4TH AVE TORRES ST 3 No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 9/9/2022 3:53 PM 220909-MNT06268 0:00:50 JUNIPERO AVE 6TH AVE 3 No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 9/9/2022 7:04 PM 220909-MNT06269 0:02:59 OCEAN AVE DEL MAR AVE 3 No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 9/10/2022 9:16 PM 220910-MNT06307 0:02:59 OCEAN AVE CARPENTER ST 3 No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 9/13/2022 2:39 PM 220913-MNT06367 0:01:21 5TH AVE JUNIPERO AVE 3 No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 9/14/2022 6:28 PM 220914-MNT06399 0:03:05 JUNIPERO AVE VISTA AVE 3 No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 9/18/2022 12:15 PM 220918-MNT06521 0:02:19 CARPENTER ST 5TH AVE 3 Smoke scare, odor of smoke 9/9/2022 3:31 AM 220909-MNT06253 0:05:42 MISSION ST VISTA AVE 3 26 0:03:15
22 09 Carmel Fire Activity Report.xlsx 2
Incident Alarm Date Incident Number Response
Time Combined Address Cross Street Priority
700 Series (False Alarms)
False alarm or false call, other 9/19/2022 8:20 PM 220919-MNT06574 0:03:46 7TH AVE SAN ANTONIO AVE 3 Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 9/5/2022 5:14 PM 220905-MNT06163 0:03:44 CAMINO REAL ST 12TH AVE 3 Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 9/16/2022 11:57 PM 220916-MNT06481 0:04:58 TORRES ST 4TH AVE 3 CO detector activation due to malfunction 9/27/2022 1:49 PM 220927-MNT06758 0:03:27 JUNIPERO AVE 8TH AVE 3 4 0:03:59
800 Series (Severe Weather)
Flood assessment 9/22/2022 3:06 PM 220922-MNT06638 0:03:36 OCEAN AVE LINCOLN ST 3 1 0:03:36
Code 2 Calls 11
Code 3 Calls 61
72 95%
Over 5 Minute Response Times Cause of Delay: Code 3 Responses Total # of Incidents
% Under 5 Minute Response Time
220908-MNT06237 E15 responded from St 15, delay due to distance 220921-MNT06624 E15 responded from St.15 area, normal response time 220909-MNT06253 Delay due to time of day
22 09 Carmel Fire Activity Report.xlsx 3
Type of Call Number Average Response Time
Fire 1 2:19
EMS 38 3:09
Rescue 0 0:00
Hazardous Condition 2 2:51
Service Calls 26 3:15
Severe Weather 1 3:36
False Call 4 3:59
Total Responses 72 3:13
Total Code 3 Calls: 61
Response Times for Code 3
Calls ≤ 5 minutes: 95%

CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
SEPTEMBER 2022
Response Summary Report by Incident Type
Fire
1%
EMS
53%
Rescue
0%
Hazardous Condition
3%
Service Calls
36%
Severe
Weather
1%
False Call
6%
Fire
EMS
Rescue
Hazardous Condition
Service Calls
Severe Weather
False Call
S:\600-Public-Safety\601-Fire-Safety-Admin\601-05-Fire-Services-OtherAgencies\Carmel\Carmel Monthly Response Report\22 09 Carmel Fire Response Summary.xlsx 10/5/2022

INCIDENT PRIORITY DATE ALARM ARRIVAL RESPONSE CALL CLEARED 220901-CFA01224 Emergent 9/1/2022 8:59:34 PM 9:01:38 PM 0:02:04 9:07:54 PM MONTE VERDE ST / O 220902-CFA01227 Emergent 9/2/2022 10:50:34 AM 10:52:56 AM 0:02:22 11:10:11 AM MISSION ST / OCEAN 220903-CFA01232 Emergent 9/3/2022 5:11:00 PM 5:15:00 PM 0:04:00 6:25:00 PM 8TH AND DOLORES 220904-CFA01237 Emergent 9/4/2022 1:13:16 PM 1:16:22 PM 0:03:06 1:52:58 PM 2 PINE RIDGE RD 220906-CFA01246 Emergent 9/6/2022 2:20:20 PM 2:21:40 PM 0:01:20 3:20:00 PM SAN CARLOS 2NW OF 220908-CFA01258 Emergent 9/8/2022 8:14:51 AM 8:17:33 AM 0:02:42 8:39:31 AM OCEAN AVE / MONTE 220908-CFA01262 Emergent 9/8/2022 2:42:14 PM 2:46:11 PM 0:03:57 3:50:00 PM SCENIC RD / 11TH AV 220909-CFA01266 Emergent 9/9/2022 3:54:53 PM 3:55:43 PM 0:00:50 3:57:52 PM JUNIPERO AVE / 6TH 220909-CFA01267 Emergent 9/9/2022 7:05:24 PM 7:07:37 PM 0:02:13 7:11:22 PM OCEAN AVE / DEL MA 220910-CFA01274 Emergent 9/10/2022 8:41:50 PM 8:44:31 PM 0:02:41 9:45:00 PM S MOUNTAIN VIEW AV 220912-CFA01277 Emergent 9/12/2022 12:29:28 AM 12:32:39 AM 0:03:11 12:55:06 AM OCEAN AVE / MISSIO 220914-CFA01284 Non-Emerg9/14/2022 10:16:44 AM 10:19:12 AM 0:02:28 10:22:18 AM SAN CARLOS ST / 8T 220914-CFA01286 Emergent 9/14/2022 4:41:39 PM 4:43:15 PM 0:01:36 5:30:00 PM 8TH AVE / SAN CARLO 220914-CFA01288 Emergent 9/14/2022 9:25:43 PM 9:29:37 PM 0:03:54 9:32:24 PM SANTA FE ST / 6TH A 220915-CFA01291 Emergent 9/15/2022 10:50:18 AM 10:53:16 AM 0:02:58 11:50:00 AM DOLORES ST / 13TH 220917-CFA01306 Emergent 9/17/2022 7:33:08 AM 7:36:08 AM 0:03:00 8:30:00 AM JUNIPERO AVE / 4TH 220917-CFA01310 Emergent 9/17/2022 9:47:09 PM 9:51:22 PM 0:04:13 10:05:19 PM DOLORES ST / OCEAN 220918-CFA01311 Emergent 9/18/2022 2:59:54 AM 3:04:00 AM 0:04:06 3:38:00 AM S MOUNTAIN VIEW AV 220918-CFA01314 Emergent 9/18/2022 12:17:09 PM 12:19:59 PM 0:02:50 12:20:31 PM CARPENTER ST / 5TH 220918-CFA01316 Emergent 9/18/2022 10:19:30 PM 10:20:44 PM 0:01:14 10:36:52 PM LINCOLN ST / 7TH AV 220919-CFA01319 Emergent 9/19/2022 1:07:22 PM 1:09:44 PM 0:02:22 1:50:00 PM OCEAN AVE / SAN AN 220920-CFA01326 Emergent 9/20/2022 1:34:50 PM 1:36:22 PM 0:01:32 2:01:54 PM SAN CARLOS ST / OC 220921-CFA01329 Emergent 9/21/2022 7:35:52 AM 7:39:08 AM 0:03:16 8:45:00 AM TORRES ST / 2ND AV 220921-CFA01333 Emergent 9/21/2022 2:12:30 PM 2:16:18 PM 0:03:48 2:25:00 PM DOLORES ST / 5TH A 220921-CFA01334 Emergent 9/21/2022 2:45:55 PM 2:48:48 PM 0:02:53 3:59:10 PM JUNIPERO AVE / 4TH 220921-CFA01335 Emergent 9/21/2022 9:51:15 PM 9:55:44 PM 0:04:29 10:50:00 PM CASANOVA ST / SAN 220922-CFA01336 Emergent 9/22/2022 1:55:19 AM 1:59:44 AM 0:04:25 3:00:00 AM DOLORES ST / 12TH 220924-CFA01347 Non-Emerg 9/24/2022 6:10:56 PM 6:18:58 PM 0:08:02 7:22:38 PM DOLORES ST / OCEAN 220925-CFA01351 Emergent 9/25/2022 10:01:55 AM 10:04:13 AM 0:02:18 11:15:00 AM DOLORES ST / 5TH A 220926-CFA01352 Emergent 9/26/2022 12:29:05 AM 12:34:11 AM 0:05:06 1:40:00 AM CARMELO ST / 4TH A 220927-CFA01355 Emergent 9/27/2022 12:40:23 AM 12:46:10 AM 0:05:47 1:51:37 AM CAMINO REAL ST / 1 220929-CFA01369 Emergent 9/29/2022 12:04:30 PM 12:06:25 PM 0:01:55 12:27:57 PM 4TH AVE / JUNIPERO 220929-CFA01371 Emergent 9/29/2022 7:58:26 PM 8:02:03 PM 0:03:37 8:48:06 PM 13TH AVE / CASANOV NUMBER OF EMS INCIDEN 33 0:03:10

INCIDENT PRIORITY DATE ALARM ARRIVAL RESPONSE CALL CLEARED 220904-CFA01236 Emergent D9/4/2022 10:31:43 AM 10:36:03 AM 0:04:20 10:44:17 AM DOLORES ST / 1ST A 220913-CFA01281 Non-Emerg9/13/2022 4:09:17 PM 4:12:19 PM 0:03:02 4:14:30 PM JUNIPERO AVE / 4TH 220913-CFA01282 Emergent 9/13/2022 7:02:30 PM 7:05:04 PM 0:02:34 7:22:29 PM 220914-CFA01287 Emergent 9/14/2022 6:29:50 PM 6:33:38 PM 0:03:48 6:42:44 PM JUNIPERO AVE / VIST 220919-CFA01325 Emergent 9/19/2022 8:21:00 PM 8:24:29 PM 0:03:29 8:38:28 PM 7TH AVE / SAN ANTO 220927-CFA01357 Emergent 9/27/2022 1:50:34 PM 1:53:53 PM 0:03:19 1:55:14 PM JUNIPERO AVE / 8TH 220927-CFA01359 Non-Emerg9/27/2022 5:52:25 PM 5:56:58 PM 0:04:33 6:00:00 PM CASANOVA ST / 8TH 220930-CFA01373 Emergent 9/30/2022 12:24:00 PM 12:27:47 PM 0:03:47 12:43:13 PM CASANOVA ST / 10TH NUMBER OF FIRE INCIDENTS 8 0:03:37
TOTAL CARMEL CITY INCIDEN 41 0:03:37

RESPONSE SUMMARY REPORT BY DISTRICT
27015 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA FIRE AMBULANCE
Alarm Dates: 09/01/2022 to 09/30/2022
STREET

MEDICAL RESPONSES CARMEL CITY

RESPONSES BY DISTRICT

OTAL AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME

AVERAGE RESPONSE

FIRE RESPONSES CARMEL CITY
STREET

AVERAGE RESPONSE
Attachment 3

INCIDENT PRIORITY DATE ALARM ARRIVAL RESPONSE CALL CLEARED

CARMEL HIGHLANDS
220905-CFA01240 Emergent 9/5/2022 5:41:07 AM 5:54:52 AM 0:13:45 6:50:00 AM 130 CYPRESS WAY 220905-CFA01241 Emergent 9/5/2022 9:47:12 AM 9:52:56 AM 0:05:44 11:32:19 AM 2605 RIBERA RD 220907-CFA01250 Emergent 9/7/2022 4:46:41 AM 5:03:20 AM 0:16:39 6:08:13 AM 31453 HWY 1 220905-CFA01251 Emergent 9/7/2022 6:46:28 AM 6:52:17 AM 0:05:49 6:54:00 AM 48 HIGHWAY 1 220907-CFA01252 Emergent 9/7/2022 11:02:43 AM 11:10:29 AM 0:07:46 12:35:48 PM 1 POINT LOBOS STAT 220925-CFA01350 Emergent 9/25/2022 7:31:50 AM 7:43:57 AM 0:12:07 9:00:00 AM 75 CORONA RD Subtotal 6 Average Response Time 0:10:18

CARMEL VALLEY
220911-CFA01276 Emergent 9/11/2022 5:04:07 PM 5:14:11 PM 0:10:04 6:40:00 PM 7440 CARMEL VALLEY 220913-CFA01280 Emergent 9/13/2022 10:01:06 AM 10:15:34 AM 0:14:28 11:23:58 AM 5490 QUAIL MEADOW 220918-CFA01313 Non-Emerg9/18/2022 9:02:11 AM 9:18:28 AM 0:16:17 9:55:00 AM 1 OLD RANCH RD Subtotal 3 Average Response Time 0:16:17

CYPRESS FIRE
220901-CFA01221 Emergent 9/1/2022 8:21:04 AM 8:29:57 AM 0:08:53 9:11:40 AM 26245 CARMEL RANC 220902-CFA01225 Emergent 9/2/2022 3:31:23 AM 3:37:52 AM 0:06:29 4:07:01 AM 3415 RIO RD 220902-CFA01226 Emergent 9/2/2022 8:34:46 AM 8:42:18 AM 0:07:32 9:21:12 AM 275 CROSSROADS BL 220903-CFA01230 Emergent 9/3/2022 12:58:23 PM 1:04:54 PM 0:06:31 2:25:00 PM 26245 CARMEL RANC 220903-CFA01233 Emergent 9/3/2022 10:43:39 PM 10:50:08 PM 0:06:29 11:59:00 PM 3665 RIO RD 220904-CFA01234 Emergent 9/4/2022 1:24:42 AM 1:32:00 AM 0:07:18 2:35:00 AM 25455 CANADA VALL 220904-CFA01238 Emergent 9/4/2022 1:55:53 PM 1:59:37 PM 0:03:44 3:15:00 PM 3850 RIO RD 220905-CFA01242 Emergent 9/5/2022 12:37:55 PM 12:42:45 PM 0:04:50 1:47:36 PM 26245 CARMEL RANC 220905-CFA01244 Emergent 9/5/2022 5:01:39 PM 5:03:48 PM 0:02:09 6:11:23 PM 4125 MARGUERITA W 220906-CFA01247 Emergent 9/6/2022 4:52:54 PM 4:58:00 PM 0:05:06 5:22:32 PM 25255 PINE HILLS DR 220907-CFA01253 Emergent 9/7/2022 4:54:00 PM 4:57:58 PM 0:03:58 5:11:07 PM 6 CROSSROADS MALL 220907-CFA01254 Emergent 9/7/2022 10:55:18 PM 11:00:39 PM 0:05:21 11:10:06 PM 3650 RIO RD 220908-CFA01257 Emergent 9/8/2022 6:22:46 AM 6:27:22 AM 0:04:36 7:20:07 AM 185 HACIENDA CARM 220909-CFA01263 Emergent 9/9/2022 6:34:57 AM 6:41:07 AM 0:06:10 7:25:24 AM 2658 15TH AVE 220909-CFA01268 Emergent 9/9/2022 7:38:57 PM 7:43:43 PM 0:04:46 8:09:06 PM 26245 CARMEL RANC 220910-CFA01271 Emergent 9/10/2022 11:02:17 AM 11:07:17 AM 0:05:00 11:20:00 AM CARMELO ST / SCENI 220910-CFA01272 Emergent D9/10/2022 4:13:41 PM 4:20:00 PM 0:06:19 5:15:00 PM 2814 14TH AVE 220912-CFA01279 Emergent 9/12/2022 12:21:44 PM 12:25:39 PM 0:03:55 1:14:27 PM 97 HIGH MEADOW LN 220914-CFA01283 Emergent 9/14/2022 7:48:16 AM 7:53:02 AM 0:04:46 8:17:03 AM 25086 HWY 1 220914-CFA01285 Emergent 9/14/2022 2:48:07 PM 2:55:46 PM 0:07:39 3:36:24 PM 6 CROSSROADS MALL 220916-CFA01297 Emergent 9/16/2022 9:23:02 AM 9:33:28 AM 0:10:26 10:40:00 AM 16 DEL MESA CARME 220918-CFA01312 Emergent 9/18/2022 7:39:16 AM 7:44:11 AM 0:04:55 8:35:00 AM 26262 CARMELO ST 220918-CFA01315 Emergent 9/18/2022 9:02:01 PM 9:09:35 PM 0:07:34 10:10:00 PM 26277 ISABELLA AVE 220919-CFA01317 Emergent 9/19/2022 2:03:07 AM 2:10:24 AM 0:07:17 2:24:08 AM 3574 OLIVER RD 220920-CFA01328 Emergent 9/20/2022 7:20:38 PM 7:26:34 PM 0:05:56 7:43:14 PM 25621 CARMEL KNOL 220921-CFA01331 Emergent 9/21/2022 12:37:39 PM 12:41:11 PM 0:03:32 12:58:00 PM HWY 1 / SAN LUIS AV 220922-CFA01337 Emergent 9/22/2022 8:28:16 AM 8:32:36 AM 0:04:20 8:48:04 AM 25593 HATTON RD 220922-CFA01338 Emergent 9/22/2022 9:19:57 AM 9:28:37 AM 0:08:40 10:10:00 AM 275 CROSSROADS BL 220923-CFA01340 Emergent 9/23/2022 7:28:01 PM 7:34:27 PM 0:06:26 8:41:38 PM 26135 CARMEL RANC 220924-CFA01345 Emergent 9/24/2022 7:38:37 AM 7:46:22 AM 0:07:45 9:10:57 AM 26020 ROTUNDA DR 220924-CFA01346 Emergent 9/24/2022 9:25:54 AM 9:30:25 AM 0:04:31 10:43:09 AM 25725 BALDWIN PL 220924-CFA01348 Emergent 9/24/2022 7:28:36 PM 7:32:13 PM 0:03:37 7:46:49 PM 26135 CARMEL RANC 220924-CFA01349 Emergent 9/24/2022 10:01:58 PM 10:06:54 PM 0:04:56 10:07:49 PM HWY 1 / CARPENTER 220926-CFA01353 Emergent 9/26/2022 9:51:19 AM 9:58:39 AM 0:07:20 10:56:58 AM 25390 CARMEL KNOL 220927-CFA01356 Emergent 9/27/2022 8:36:22 AM 8:41:40 AM 0:05:18 9:45:00 AM 26245 CARMEL RANC 220928-CFA01366 Emergent 9/28/2022 2:14:58 PM 2:20:24 PM 0:05:26 2:42:40 PM 24501 VIA MAR MON 220929-CFA01370 Emergent 9/29/2022 7:19:43 PM 7:23:51 PM 0:04:08 7:58:02 PM 24558 PORTOLA RD 220930-CFA01372 Emergent 9/30/2022 7:05:57 AM 7:10:48 AM 0:04:51 7:55:00 AM 25725 BALDWIN PL 220930-CFA01375 Emergent 9/30/2022 6:56:09 PM 7:02:26 PM 0:06:17 8:05:12 PM 3850 RIO RD Subtotal 39 Average Response Time 0:05:46

INCIDENT

CARMEL VALLEY

CYPRESS FIRE

INCIDENT
STREET
Carmel Highlands

INCIDENT
Attachment 3

PEBBLE BEACH
220903-CFA01229 Emergent 9/3/2022 10:26:20 AM 10:36:00 AM 0:09:40 11:50:00 AM 3171 FOREST LAKE R 220903-CFA01231 Emergent 9/3/2022 3:46:20 PM 3:54:00 PM 0:07:40 3:57:03 PM 1500 CYPRESS DR 220910-CFA01273 Emergent 9/10/2022 5:46:31 PM 5:59:59 PM 0:13:28 6:50:00 PM 640 SPRUCE AVE 220916-CFA01303 Emergent 9/16/2022 9:08:33 PM 9:20:57 PM 0:12:24 10:30:00 PM 1191 LOOKOUT RD 220917-CFA01307 Emergent 9/17/2022 10:19:37 AM 10:32:24 AM 0:12:47 11:30:00 AM 2700 SEVENTEEN MIL 220920-CFA01327 Emergent 9/20/2022 5:25:40 PM 5:32:40 PM 0:07:00 6:33:13 PM 1518 PALMERO WAY 220923-CFA01339 Emergent 9/23/2022 9:13:52 AM 9:25:37 AM 0:11:45 10:26:52 AM 3150 SEVENTEEN MIL 220923-CFA01341 Emergent 9/23/2022 8:48:51 PM 9:08:22 PM 0:19:31 9:14:57 PM 3302 SEVENTEEN MIL Subtotal 8 Average Response Time 0:11:47

PACIFIC GROVE
220908-CFA01255 Non-Emerg9/8/2022 5:03:33 AM 5:22:42 AM 0:19:09 6:03:05 AM 651 SINEX AVE 220908-CFA01260 Emergent 9/8/2022 9:46:29 AM 9:54:40 AM 0:08:11 10:32:05 AM 551 GIBSON AVE 220915-CFA01295 Emergent 9/15/2022 6:12:00 PM 6:24:56 PM 0:12:56 7:20:00 PM 1113 PRESIDIO BLVD 220916-CFA01302 Emergent 9/16/2022 6:47:48 PM 6:57:54 PM 0:10:06 7:45:00 PM FOREST AVE / ADOBE 220929-CFA01367 Emergent 9/29/2022 6:37:22 AM 6:50:12 AM 0:12:50 7:45:00 AM 551 GIBSON AVE Subtotal 5 Average Response Time 0:11:01
MARINA
220908-CFA01261 Emergent 9/8/2022 12:44:22 PM 1:00:14 PM 0:15:52 2:08:01 PM RESERVATION RD / L 220919-CFA01323 Emergent 9/19/2022 5:33:47 PM 5:44:55 PM 0:11:08 6:20:11 PM 930 2ND AVE Subtotal 2 Average Response Time 0:11:08

MID COAST
220905-CFA01243 Emergent 9/5/2022 2:05:41 PM 2:34:10 PM 0:28:29 4:49:34 PM 36260 HWY 1 Subtotal 1 Average Response Time 0:28:29

MONTEREY
220915-CFA01290 Emergent 9/15/2022 8:35:09 AM 8:44:49 AM 0:09:40 10:00:00 AM 1526 MTY SNS HWY 220915-CFA01292 Emergent 9/15/2022 1:59:24 PM 2:07:59 PM 0:08:35 2:45:00 PM 65 SOLEDAD DR 220916-CFA01299 Emergent 9/16/2022 12:11:00 PM 12:13:43 PM 0:02:43 12:16:00 PM 300 FREMONT ST 220927-CFA01361 Emergent 9/27/2022 7:26:07 PM 7:29:39 PM 0:03:32 7:43:43 PM 625 PACIFIC ST 220928-CFA01362 Emergent 9/28/2022 6:13:45 AM 6:25:42 AM 0:11:57 6:50:25 AM 200 GLENWOOD CIR 220930-CFA01374 Emergent 9/30/2022 4:04:29 PM 4:16:39 PM 0:12:10 5:25:00 PM 1501 SKYLINE DR Subtotal 6 Average Response Time 0:08:06

SEASIDE/SAND CITY
220909-CFA01265 Emergent 9/9/2022 11:27:02 AM 11:36:47 AM 0:09:45 12:35:27 PM 2055 MILITARY AVE 220924-CFA01342 Emergent 9/23/2022 11:07:00 PM 11:16:00 PM 0:09:00 1:15:00 AM 5100 COE AVE Subtotal 2 Average Response Time 0:09:23
TOTAL All CALLS 113 0:06:30

INCIDENT

INCIDENT

INCIDENT

MID COAST

INCIDENT

PACIFIC GROVE

TOTAL AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME

SEASIDE/SAND CITY
MARINA

INCIDENT

PEBBLE BEACH

MONTEREY

INCIDENT
Attachment 3
District Response Number Average Response Time
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 41 0:03:37
CARMEL HIGHLANDS 6 0:10:18
CARMEL VALLEY 3 0:16:17
CYPRESS FIRE PROTECTION 39 0:05:46
PEBBLE BEACH 8 0:11:47
PACIFIC GROVE 5 0:11:01
MONTEREY 6 0:08:06
SEASIDE 2 0:09:23
MARINA 2 0:11:08
MID COAST 1 0:28:29
Total Responses 113 0:06:30
%of code 3 medical responses in Carmel < 5min 93.94%

CITY OF CARMEL - FIRE AMBULANCE DEPARTMENT
SEPTEMBER 2022
Response Summary Report by District Type

CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
36%

CARMEL HIGHLANDS
5% CARMEL VALLEY
3%

CYPRESS FIRE

PROTECTION
35%

PEBBLE BEACH
7%

PACIFIC GROVE
4%

MONTEREY
5%

SEASIDE
2%
MARINA
2%

MID COAST
1%

CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CARMEL HIGHLANDS

CARMEL VALLEY

CYPRESS FIRE PROTECTION

PEBBLE BEACH

PACIFIC GROVE

MONTEREY

SEASIDE
MARINA

MID COAST
Attachment 3
2022 PRA Log ‐ September
request
number
Date
Requested
10‐day
response
date
records requested requestor date
completed
notes
2022‐048 9/1/2022 9/12/2022 Copy of Carmel's current On‐Call Landscape Maintenance Contract Kathleen Mitchell 9/2/2022 no current contract exists 2022‐049 9/6/2022 9/16/2022 title records for the home on San Carlos 2 NE of 12th in Carmel by the Sea, CA 93923 Thana Makdsdi 9/6/2022 No responsive documents. Directed them to the Monterey County Clerk Recorder 2022‐050 9/7/2022 9/19/2022 Amount of money paid to Telecom Law Firm and BB&K regarding Wireless Ordinance Mary Schley 9/8/2022 sent records 2022‐051 9/8/2022 9/19/2022
all information—including communication between staff and council—‐ pertaining to the allocation of $272,676 that was collected for parklet rental, and supposedly used for beautification of downtown. Where did the money get spent (if any at all) and where is the balance of these funds?
Parker Logan 9/30/2022
sent fund balance, fund total,
fund expenditures on 9/8. Nocommunications confirmed
9/30/22
2022‐052 9/8/2022 9/19/2022
log of the city’s art collection, all inventory including installations and stored pieces. I want to know where installed pieces can be viewed and details of where the remaining unhung pieces are stored, including but not limited to how they are stored, the temperature at which they are stored, the manner in which they are stored (wrapped, boxed, stacked, etc. ) and an audit to ensure no pieces are unaccounted for.

Parker Logan 9/12/2022 sent records
2022‐053 9/8/2022 9/19/2022
All communications between Lyle Coe (or Coe & Company) and the City of Carmel (all departments) from March 1, 2022 to today (Sept 8, 2022), to include all letters, emails, texts, meeting notes, phone logs, or other communications to or from Coe or the City.

Anonnymous 9/30/2022 extended deadline to 10/3/22. Recods sent on 9/30/22 2022‐054 9/15/2022 9/26/2022
all communication, dating back to January 1, 2019 to present day, regarding the climate action plan, climate change, and global warming. Specifically the request is all communication between Jeff Baron and staff— Also all communication between Jeff baron and the council, including the mayor. All
communication should include private and city owned cellular texts, private and city operated emails, and any other written or voice recorded communication on the subject of climate
change/climate action plan.

Parker Logan extended deadline to 10/24/2022
2022 PRA Log ‐ September
2022‐055 9/13/2022 9/23/2022
Business License for YAFA Resturant in Carmel. License might be under the name of "Urdon Corporation, a California Corporation" (mail records)
Mark Zorne 9/16/2022 record sent
2022‐056 9/14/2022 9/26/2022
the current rate sheets for both solid waste and recycling for commercial and multi‐family with the effective date. I have attached a copy of the 2021 franchise rate sheet as an example of what I am requesting. If the 2021 rates are still effective, please let me know. My hope is that you will forward me a copy of the 2022 rates. I found the 2021 rates on the City of Carmel by the Sea, CA website.

Doreen Vickery 9/23/2022 records sent
2022‐057 9/23/2022 10/3/2022
All plans, permits, applications, designs, depictions, diagrams, agendas, minutes, resolutions, approvals, disapprovals, agreements, bids, contracts, invoices, payment vouchers, receipts, photographs, correspondence, requests, notices, and work orders associated with the Right of Way fronting 4 North San Antonio, Carmel, California APN 010‐241‐001 including the maintenance and removal of Cypress, loquat, and other trees on that right of way for the period of time January 1, 2018 through September 23, 2022.

Mark O'Connor 10/6/2022
sent plans, permits, applications,
designs, depictions, receipts,
notices, approvals, on 10/6/22.
2022‐058 9/27/2022 10/7/2022
the total amount of money spent for Council Member Baron's:
salary, benefits, city cell phone, and any Council related travel expenses, from December 2018 (when he took office) to present Parker Logan extended deadline to 10/24/2022
2022‐059 9/27/2022 10/7/2022
How much the City paid in storage fees each year, with monthly breakdowns for each storage facility for anything stored outside of a city owned property in 2021 and 2022
Parker Logan 10/7/2022 records sent
2022‐060 9/27/2022 10/7/2022 Business License application for Barmel Supper Club Mary Schley 10/4/2022 records sent 2022‐061 9/20/2022 9/30/2022 All permanent encroachment permits issued for properties located in the RC zone in the City Cody Phillips 10/14/2022 records sent Request No. Request Date &
Received By
10-Day Due
Date
Date Completed by
PSO Requestor Info Requested Status Date & PSO Mailed
2022‐00001 9/1/22 da 9/11/2022 9/2/22 da Lexis Nexis CA2200366 completed mailed by DA 2022‐00002 9/1/22 da 9/11/2022 9/2/22 da Lexis Nexis CA2200365 completed mailed by DA 2022‐00003 9/1/22 da 9/11/2022 9/2/22 da Lexis Nexis Accident no record mailed back by DA 2022‐00004 9/9/22 DA 9/19/2022 9/10/22 DA Metropolitan Reporting CA2200413 completed mailed by DA 2022‐00005 9/9/22 DA 9/19/2022 9/10 DA Lexis Nexis CG2200362 completed mailed chp 180 only by DA 2022‐00006 9/9/22 DA 9/19/2022 9/10/22 DA Lexis Nexis Accident completed card exchange/no rpt 2022‐00007 9/9/22 DA 9/19/2022 9/10/22 DA Lexis Nexis CA2200366 completed mailed by DA 2022‐00008 9/11/22 Da 9/21/2022 9/11/22 DA Sarah Mccallister CG2200353/CG220035 0 completed PU 09/22/2022
2022‐00009 9/12/22 DA 9/22/2022 9/15/22 DA Marie Rodriguez CG2200423 completed awaiting pick up 2022‐00010 9/20/22MS 9/30/2022 9/24 DA Kelly Regan CG2000579 completed interview #3 & face pages mailed
2022‐00011 9/20/22 MS 9/30/2022 9/23 DNA Saclia Khan CG2200424 completed awaiting pickup 2022‐00012 9/23/22 DA 10/3/2022 9/23/22 DA Metropolitan Reporting CA2200297 completed mailed by DA 2022‐00013 9/23/22 DA 10/3/2022 9/23 DA Lexis Nexis CC2200401 completed mailed by DA 2022‐00014 09/23/22 JD 10/3/2022 9/25 DA Akshada Kulkarni CG2200406 completed mailed by DA 2022‐00015 09/23/2022 JD 10/3/2022 9/25 DA Christopher Groves CJ2200068 denied denial letter mailed (under investigation)
2022‐00016 9/25/22 DA 10/5/2022 10/1/2022 Malcolm O'Donovan CG2200343 completed emailed by DA POLICE RECORDS REQUEST LOG - SEPTEMBER 2022
Attachment 4

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
Monthly Report
Public Works Department Report
September 2022
Meeting Date: 11-1-2022
Forest and Beach Commission Meeting of September 8, 2022  Meeting canceled due to a lack of quorum.

City Council Meeting of September 13, 2022
 Adopted Resolution 2022-075, awarding a Professional Services Agreement to 4Leaf, Inc. for $197,780 for Project Management services to implement the Police Building Renovation Project – Expanded Scope, construction of the 2020/21 Paving Project, and two other new capital improvement projects.  Adopted Resolution 2022-076, awarding a Professional Services Agreement to the Carmel Area Wastewater District to provide Vactor services for three years for a not-to-exceed fee of $71,647.  Adopted Resolution 2022-085, appointing Tamara Michie and Kelly Brezoczky to the Forest and Beach Commission for four-year terms ending May 30, 2026.

Climate Committee Meeting of September 15, 2022
 Reviewed a proposal from a consulting team combining EMC Planning Group, Integral Consulting, and Haro Kasunich & Associates to perform Phases I and II of the Coastal Engineering Study and Beach Sand Survey Projects, as outlined under the adopted Climate Adaptation Plan. Phase I is funded at this time at $175,000, and Phase II is anticipated by a $100,000 non-competitive Coastal Commission Local Coastal Program Grant. The Committee recommended forwarding a Contract to Council for approval, with stipulations, at the November meeting.

Public Works Administration
 Welcomed new Forest and Beach Commissioners Tamara Michie and Kelly Brezoczky, and provided an overview of the Public Works Department, Forestry Division, and Commission meeting expectations.  Maintenance Worker candidates were interviewed, a selection was made, offer accepted, and a background check is in progress.
 The Facility Maintenance Specialist position was posted as an internal promotional opportunity, and interview is scheduled in early October.
 Completed the draft Request for Proposals for the Scout House Renovation, Activities Programming, and Facility Management Operations and Maintenance Agreement, and routed for comments.  Prepared the Climate Committee staff report and gave the presentation at the September 15th meeting.  Issued letter to Councilmembers regarding incidents involving PG&E removing several City trees without prior notification to the City Forester. While PG&E has the responsibility for pruning and removal for public safety, the long-standing practice was to coordinate ahead of time so that the City has the opportunity to provide input into the timing, place, and manner of the work. The matter will be presented to the Forest & Beach Commission in October.
 Met with the California Coastal Commission enforcement regarding PG&E’s removal of trees in the City without prior notification to the City. Evaluating City’s authority through the Local Coastal Permit to require PG&E to mitigate tree removals, such as by replanting trees or providing in-lieu fees.

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Robert M. Harary, P.E., Director of Public Works SUBMITTED ON: October 3, 2022
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
Attachment 5
Public Works Department Report – September 2022
 Ranked Statements of Qualifications received for on-call geotechnical engineering and materials testing services, and prepared a $24,999 Professional Services Agreement with Haro Kasunich & Associates.  Met with Site LogiQ representatives to consider resuming the implementation of certain energy efficiency projects, based on their energy audit conducted prior to the Pandemic.  Met with the Carmel Area Wastewater District to coordinate their upcoming Scenic Road Sewer Pipe Bursting and Pescadero Road Sewer Replacement Projects.  Held negotiations with Otis Elevator who continue to invoice the City for dumbwaiter maintenance services in the Park Branch Library (PBL), even though the dumbwaiter has been out of service for 10 years. All reasonable attempts to resolve the matter were dismissed by Otis, and the matter may be referred to the City Attorney’s office.

Carmel Cares
 The Downtown Detail continued to make significant downtown beautification improvements by planting in additional street bump outs, placing potted plants, improving tree wells, removing debris, landscaping around parking lots, and removing graffiti.
 Coordinated with the Green Cadre, a youth workforce training program sponsored by Monterey County.

The workgroup is scheduled to support Carmel Cares around the City starting in late October. Projects will include installation of a post and rail fencing along Forest Hill Park, invasive removals in the North Dunes Habitat Restoration Area, planting at the Forest Theater, and others.  Continued to improve the Scenic Pathway and Forest Theater site, and maintain Vista Lobos Park, Sunset Center grounds, and numerous landscaped medians.

Environmental Programs
 Environmental Technician, Jessica Juico, attended the California Climate and Energy Forum in San Diego to learn about the latest trends in climate action planning, electrification, decarbonization, and environmental justice.
 Reviewed the draft technical report that summarizes the findings of 4 years of watershed sampling for the Area of Special Biological Significance.
 Reviewed biological and archaeological reports prepared by consultant, Dudek, regarding the three stream stability projects to be constructed in 2023 in the Mission Trail Nature Preserve (MTNP).  Coordinated with PG&E to launch the design of new EV charging stations to be installed in the Vista Lobos parking lot. One charging station is planned to be high capacity to energize our new electric street sweeper which is scheduled to be delivered in early 2023. Site meeting with PG&E in October.  Coordinated with the Monterey Regional Waste Management District and their contractor who will begin to provide spot-inspections of waste and recycling containers in Carmel and other jurisdictions, to ensure compliance with SB1383. These inspections are also referred to as “lid flipping.”  Began to prepare the very long and complicated Annual Stormwater Report as required by the State Water Quality Control Board.

Facility Maintenance
 Began the ADA Upgrades Project, Year 5, by lowering a 911 Emergency phone box to ADA-compliant height in Forest Hill Park, and ordering an ADA drinking fountain with refill station for the PBL  Repaired the irrigation backflow device in the Harrison Memorial Library garden.  Fixed the Forest Theater alarm transmitter which was sending dozens of error messages daily.  Scrubbed and repainted both Forest Hill Park restrooms after graffiti was sprayed nearly every weekend in September.
 Replaced electrical receptacles and switches in the Community Planning and Building office following their second painting project.
 Lubricated squeaky wheels of the old green chairs at the Council dais.  Supported the Flu Clinic at Vista Lobos.
 Provided new remotes and fixed exhaust fans for the Fire Station.  Ordered and stocked first aid supply cabinets for multiple departments. Also ordered new cabinets to house automated external defibrillators.

Attachment 5
Public Works Department Report – September 2022
 Received quotes to permanently close the dumbwaiter at the Park Branch Library.  Negotiated with Sentry Alarm to soften their demand to pre-pay a year in advance, instead of monthly billings as in previous contracts, to compromise with quarterly billings.

Project Management (PM) for Capital Improvement Program  The contract was executed and the Notice to Proceed was issued to 4Leaf to provide PM services for the following four capital projects. Highlights of the kickoff meeting included:
o Police Building Renovation Project Additional Scope – Initial emphasis will be to urgently complete a Professional Services Agreement with Kasavan Architects, to evaluate the impacts of the proposed additional renovations, including an EOC, witness report room, upgraded lockers, EV charging station, etc., on potential building code requirements, including fire suppression, ADAcompliance, electrical re-wiring, and/or seismic upgrades, all of which would impact cost and time. o 2020/21 Paving Project – While the plans and technical specifications have been completed for some time, the construction contract documents and special provisions require significant editing and updating prior to bidding. The Project is scheduled for construction in the Springtime. o Infrastructure Resiliency Pilot Project – This project will review possible battery storage and microgrid options for the Police, Public Works, Vista Lobos, and Youth Center facilities. o Electrical Panel Upgrades at four buildings – Statements of Qualifications submitted by four electrical engineering firms are being reviewed and ranked to plan and design this project.  Specifications and contract documents were completed by Ausonio for the City Hall Retaining Wall Repair Project and submitted for review. Project is scheduled to be submitted for a building permit and to be advertise for bids by late October.
 A review of carpeting specifications for the HML Carpet Replacement Project revealed that the existing carpeting throughout the HML likely contains asbestos-containing glue beneath. Remediation could significantly increase the cost of this project.
 Reviewed seven Statements of Qualifications, and short-listed and interviewed three architectural firms to provide on-call, as-need architectural services for various facility renovation projects, and to prepare the Facilities Condition Assessment of Four Buildings Project. 10 Over Studios was selected for on-call architectural services and a Professional Services Agreement was prepared. Bureau Veritas was selected for Facilities Condition Assessments, and they are preparing a project-specific proposal.  For the City-Wide Drainage System Repair Project, a Professional Services Agreement was prepared with Schaaf and Wheeler to update the Storm Drain Master Plan for 20-year storm event analysis to reflect Climate Change, among other reasons. Agreement scheduled for Council award in October.  Reviewed proposals received from two short-listed architectural firms to prepare the Libraries Master Plan, and scheduled interviews in early October.

Street Maintenance
 As recommended at the July 28th meeting of the Traffic Safety Committee, installed a crosswalk across Seventh Avenue, just west of Junipero Street, to align with the eastern Carmel Plaza sidewalk and ramps. While this crosswalk is located before the Stop sign for eastbound travelers, the crosswalk and yield to pedestrian signs makes this situation safer, although not ideal.  Made several hot mix street repair patches after removing root-damaged pavement areas.  Installed asphalt berms along several residential streets.  Prepared for mid-September rains, and cleaned up minor storm damage afterwards. Over an inch and a half of rain was recorded.
 Replaced and compacted decomposed granite which got washed out along the Fourth Avenue pedestrian walkway.
 Finished installing drainage improvements on Acacia Way.  Began the annual Storm Drain Inspection Program to prepare for the winter season.  Repaired a storm drain manhole cover ring damaged by a contractor.  Continued making sidewalk repairs. Since the backlog of repairs is increasing, scheduled a full-time crew to make sidewalk repairs in the downtown area indefinitely.  Removed the five firepits from the beach in mid-September.

Attachment 5
Public Works Department Report – September 2022
Forestry Parks and Beach Report (Forester’s Report)
 As part of the Cal Fire grant, 108 new trees will be planted. The initial round of tree planting is planned to begin in October.
 One addendum was issued during bidding of the on-call landscape maintenance contract. Only one bid proposal, submitted by Town & Country Gardening & Landscaping, was received at the September 20th Bid Opening. The bid contained one irregularity that will be waived by Council when the $140,000 contract is awarded in October.
 Compiled the Forest and Beach Commission’s final recommendations and all supporting documentation regarding the Scenic Pathway benches, for submittal to the Planning Commission and Community Planning and Building Department.
 Preparation of the on-call tree care services contracts and bid documents are being finalized.  Refurbished a table in front of City Hall that originated from the Sequoia National Forest.

There are many steps in the tree planting process. The following is a general outline of the process:

1. Vacant spaces are found, marked, and mapped

2. Posts are placed in the ground to indicated the future home of a new tree

3. A request for the underground utilities to be marked is made.

4. Up to three days later, the utilities are marked

5. The sites are re-visited to check if the utilities will prohibit a new tree

6. Trees types are assigned

7. Trees are planted

8. Trees are put on a watering rotation
This process requires each space to be visited at least three times prior to planting. 2022 Permitted Removals and Required Planting
Removals Plant
Upper
Plant
Lower
No room
for New
Tree
Meets Density
Recommendation
Total Number of Trees
Required
January 2 1 1 0 0 2
February 14 4 5 0 3 9
March 13 4 4 0 4 8
April 7 2 5 3 2 7
May 19 8 4 3 4 12
June 11 3 1 0 6 4
July 8 1 1 4 1 2
August 41 16 10 5 3 26
September 9 5 2 0 0 7
October
November
December
2022 Totals 124 44 33 15 23 77
Historic Permitted Removals and Required Planting
Tree Planting Procedure
. Private and Development Activities
Attachment 5
Public Works Department Report – September 2022
Removal
Permits
Removal
of Upper
Removal
of Lower
Replanting
Required
Replanting
of Upper
Replanting
of Lower
Replanting
%
2012 96 20 20.83%
2013 123 60 63 59 31 29 47.97%
2014 145 64 81 49 35 20 33.79%
2016 90 37 41.11%
2017 119 50 69 43 15 28 36.13%
2018 77 37 60 20 1 18 20.62%
2019 170 107 63 116 53 63 68.24%
2020 98 57 41 93 67 26 94.90%
Permitted
removals
Removal
of upper
Removal
of lower
Replanting
Required
Replanting
of upper
Replanting
of lower
Replanting
%
Applications
processed
2021 204 81 123 135 81 54 66.18% 213
2022* 124 76 48 77 44 33 62.10 144
*year to date
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
2013 2014 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022*
Required Replanting
Re-planting of upper Re-planting of lower * year do
City Forestry, Parks, and Beach Activities
Attachment 5
Public Works Department Report – September 2022
71 96 67
139 165 149 176 165 132 159
88 98
207
256
556 425
163
107
187
115 101
96 631
74 75
38 40
105
113
66 72
59 62
55 15
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022* City Performed Tree Work Year by Year Comparison
Removal Prunning Planting * year to date
2 1 1
10 4
36 36 43 60 47 42 40
58 35
8 9
5 5
2 5
17 18
8 12 9
15 14
17 20 17
33 16
5 4
0 6
3 3
3 1
0 0
2 3
0 105
164
218
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Task Count
Month
2022 Admistrative Field Tasks
Failures Inspection Plan reviews
*Fresh Desk ticketing
began with the fiscal year
Attachment 5

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
November 1, 2022

CONSENT AGENDA
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Brian Pierik, City Attorney
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
SUBJECT:

Resolution 2022-093, Proclaiming the Continuing Need To Meet By Teleconference Pursuant To Government Code Section 54953 (e)
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2022-093 of the City Council of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, proclaiming the continuing need to meet by teleconference pursuant to Government Code Section 54953 (e).

BACKGROUND/SUMMARY:

All meetings of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea legislative bodies are open and public as required by the Ralph M.

Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code 54950 – 54963).

Before COVID-19, Section 54953(b) of the Brown Act allowed for teleconferencing if the public agency complied with the following requirements:

1. At least a quorum of the members of the legislative body must participate from locations within the boundaries within the jurisdiction of the local agency.

2. An agenda shall be posted at all teleconference locations.

3. Each teleconference location shall be identified in the notice and agenda of the meeting.

4. Each teleconference location shall be accessible to the public.

AB 361 amended Government Code Section 54953 and authorizes a City to allow for modified teleconferencing rules, subject to the existence of certain requirements which are listed below in this Staff Report.

Government Code section 54953(e)(1) lists the circumstances under which a local agency may use such modified teleconferencing procedures, as follows:
(1) A local agency may use teleconferencing without complying with the requirements of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) if the legislative body complies with the requirements of paragraph (2) of this subdivision in any of the following circumstances:
(A) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency, and state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing. (B) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.
(C) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency and has determined, by majority vote, pursuant to subparagraph (B) that, as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a State of Emergency as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The State of Emergency remains in effect and COVID-19 continues to threaten the health and lives of the public and the Delta variant is highly transmissible in indoor settings. In addition, breakthrough cases are becoming more common.

On September 22, 2021, the County of Monterey Health Department issued a Recommendation Regarding Social Distancing Including Remote Meetings of Legislative Bodies which provides:
“The Monterey County Health Department continues to recommend that physical and social distancing strategies be practiced in Monterey County, which includes remote meetings of legislative bodies of local agencies, to the extent possible.

Monterey County continues to experience transmission of COVID-19 locally. Physical and social distancing is still an effective measure to reduce the spread of COVID-19, especially when combined with use of face coverings, frequent hand washing, staying home when ill, testing, and vaccination with U.S.

Food and Drug Administration approved or authorized COVID-19 vaccines.

Remote meetings of legislative bodies allow for the virtual participation of agency staff, presenters, and community members in safer environments, with less risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

The Monterey County Health Officer will continue to monitor local metrics and the necessity of this recommendation.”
Thus, meetings of the City Council and its legislative bodies may be held pursuant to the terms of Government Code Section 54953(e)(1)(A) so long as a proclaimed state of emergency continues and state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing.

If, for some reason, state or local officials discontinue imposing or recommending measures to promote social distancing, the proposed Resolution would also authorize teleconferencing under the rules of 54953(e) so long as a proclaimed state of emergency continues.

On October 4, 2021, the City Council adopted the initial Resolution No. 2021-057 authorized by AB 361 to allow for meetings of the City Council to be held telephonically.

Government Code Section 54953 (e) (3) provides that every 30 days after teleconferencing for the first time, and every 30 days thereafter, to continue teleconferencing the City Council must state that it has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency and that either of the following circumstances exist: (1) The state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person or (2) State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing. Currently, both of these circumstances continue to exist and, for that reason, the recommended action is for the City Council to adopt the attached Resolution of the City Council of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Proclaiming the Continuing Need To Meet By Teleconference Pursuant To Government Code Section 54953 (e), Attachment 2 to this Staff Report.

This Resolution will authorize the City Council, and other legislative bodies of the City, to hold teleconference meetings within the requirements of AB 361, but does not prohibit the City from holding in person meetings in the future.

If the Resolution is adopted, then the City and its legislative bodies which hold teleconference meetings must follow the procedures set forth by AB 361, which include the following:

1. Notice of the meeting must still be given in compliance with the Brown Act, and the notice must include the means by which the public may access the meeting and provide public comment.

2. The public must be provided access to the meeting via a call-in option or internet-based service option and allowed to “address the legislative body directly.” The agency does not have to provide an in-person option for the public to attend the meeting.

3. The meeting must be conducted “in a manner that protects the statutory and constitutional rights of the parties and the public appearing before the legislative body.”

4. If there is a disruption to the meeting broadcast or in the ability to take call-in or internet-based public comment, no further action can be taken on agenda items until the issue is resolved.

5. The body cannot require comments to be submitted before the start of the meeting. The public must be allowed to make “real time” public comment.

6. Reasonable time for public comment must be provided. If the agency provides a timed public comment period, the public comment period must be left open until the time expires.

7. All votes must be taken by roll call.

8. The legislative body must approve a resolution making findings every 30 days to continue to conduct teleconference meetings under AB 361. The body must find it has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency and either 1) the emergency continues to impact the ability to meet safely in person, or 2) State or local officials continue to impose or recommend social distancing.

If the state of emergency ends or if the City Council decides to rescind the Resolution, then meetings of the City Council and other legislative bodies of the City must comply with the pre-COVID teleconferencing rules of 54953(b) described earlier in this Staff Report.

Without this Resolution, as noted, if a Council Member or a member of a City Board or Commission does not attend a meeting in person, then the agenda would need to be posted at the location of that person and the public would have access to that location. This Resolution (so long as Government Code Section 54953 allows) would provide flexibility to the Council, Board Members and Commissioners when meetings are held in person to attend remotely if they do not attend in person without the necessity of posting an agenda at their location and there would be no limit on the number (quorum must be physically present without this Resolution) of Council Members, Board Members and Commissioners who attend remotely. There are some public agencies in California which have adopted a Resolution authorized by AB 361 and use a “hybrid” method for attendance at meetings in which some members attend in person and other members attend remotely and the staff and public also can attend in person or remotely.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No direct fiscal impact for this action.

PRIOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION:

Adoption of Initial Resolution No.2021-057 on October 4, 2021 and continuing Resolutions at subsequent meetings of the City Council.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1) Resolution 2022-093

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-093

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL- BY-THE-SEA

PROCLAIMING THE CONTINUING NEED TO MEET BY TELECONFERENCE PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953 (e)
WHEREAS, all meetings of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea legislative bodies are open and public as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code 54950 – 54963); and WHEREAS, the Brown Act, Government Code section 54953(e), makes provisions for remote teleconferencing participation in meetings by members of a legislative body, without compliance with the requirements of Government Code section 54953(b)(3), subject to the existence of certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a State of Emergency as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic; and
WHEREAS, such State of Emergency remains in effect; and WHEREAS, COVID-19 continues to threaten the health and lives of City of Carmel-bythe-Sea residents; and WHEREAS, the Delta variant is highly transmissible in indoor settings; and WHEREAS, breakthrough cases are becoming more common; and WHEREAS, on October 4, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-57 Proclaiming The Continuing Need To Meet By Teleconference Pursuant To Government Code Section 54953 (e).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carmelby-the-Sea that:

Section 1. Imminent Risk to Health and Safety. Due to COVID-19, holding City Council and other legislative body meetings in person will present imminent risk to the health and safety to attendees.

Section 2. Findings. The City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency and finds that: (1) The state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person and (2) The County of Monterey continues to recommend measures to promote social distancing.

Section 2. Compliance With Government Code Section 54953. The City Council and other legislative bodies will continue to meet by teleconference in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e).

Attachment 1
Resolution 2022-093

Section 3. Effective Date of Resolution. This Resolution shall take effect immediatelyupon its adoption and shall be effective until the earlier of (i) 30 days from the date of adoption of this Resolution, or (ii) such time the City Council adopts a subsequent resolution rescinding this Resolution.

Section 4. Future Resolutions. The City Council expressly reserves the right to adopt Resolutions more than 30 days after this date of adoption of this Resolution to authorize the City Council and other legislative bodies to continue to meet by teleconference in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) provided that a State of Emergency exists as of the date of adoption of such Resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea this 1st day of November, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED: ATTEST:
__________________________ _________________________
Dave Potter Nova Romero, MMC
Mayor City Clerk
Attachment 1

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
November 1, 2022

CONSENT AGENDA
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Agnes Martelet, Manager, Environmental Compliance APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
SUBJECT:

Resolution 2022-094 Authorizing the City Administrator to execute a Professional Services Agreement with EMC Planning Group Inc., for a not-to-exceed fee of $175,000, to conduct the Coastal Engineering and Adaptation Planning Project RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2022-094 authorizing the City Administrator to execute a Professional Services Agreement with EMC Planning Group Inc., for a not-to-exceed fee of $175,000, to conduct the Coastal Engineering and Adaptation Planning Project.

BACKGROUND/SUMMARY:

Project Origins
As shown in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022/23 and 2021/22 Adopted Budgets, there are two funded Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects involved with this Agenda report as follows:
"Sea Level Rise/Coastal Engineering Report: This report has been identified by the Climate Committee as a critical document for sea level rise resilience planning. This report will ensure the City has the information and tools necessary to make decisions related to the long-term durability and maintenance needs of our coastal resources and infrastructure. For efficiency, this project would be combined with the Beach Sand Survey and Wall Inspections project, a FY 2021/22 carry-over project. A consultant would be needed with an estimated fee of $150,000. Staff is researching whether grant opportunities can be leveraged to fund this project. A request for Statements of Qualifications has been posted to hire a consultant to execute this, and many other projects. The Environmental Compliance Manager will manage this project."
“Beach Sand Survey and Wall Inspections: This project involves collecting and reviewing existing data and aerial imagery to determine rates of beach sand loss. Next, the project establishes a series of beach profile transects to facilitate long-term beach sand monitoring. In addition, this project funds the initial, non-destructive inspection by a coastal engineer of the shoreline armoring structures during low sand levels to determine priorities and phasing for anticipated repairs." At their August 2, 2022 meeting, the City Council adopted the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea's Climate Adaptation Plan and Climate Action Plan under Resolution 2022-064. Council commented that implementation of these Plans is imperative and requested the Climate Committee to continue to oversee the implementation of certain projects, including the Coastal Engineering Study and the Beach Sand Survey.

The adopted Climate Adaptation Plan includes Action 3.1.9, which states, “Sea Level Rise Coastal Vulnerability Study. Hire coastal engineer with experience in planning for climate change to:
(1) Conduct research and prepare a Sea-Level Rise Vulnerability Study to further assess the risks to the city’s coastal assets, including the beach, sea walls, revetments, bluffs, stairs and access, public bathrooms, parking areas, drainage infrastructure, and utilities. (2) Determine adaptation measures and Local Coastal Program policy options, including but not limited to: a) Mostly natural, unarmored North Dunes area; b) mostly armored bluffs along Scenic Roach south of 8th Avenue; c) Unarmored dunes along private property between 8th Avenue and Del Mar Parking Lot; d) Armored private properties on the bluffs at the north end of the City (Pescadero Canyon area). (3) Evaluate the use of thresholds for phasing adaptation projects based on changing coastal conditions. Consider applying an adaptive pathways approach which establishes trigger thresholds for different adaptive measures based on the severity of the impact from flooding and erosion associated with sea-level rise.”
Consultant Selection Process
In April 2022, requests for Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) were advertised, from San Jose to Sacramento to San Luis Obispo, seeking qualifications from consultants covering 14 professional service areas, including Coastal Engineering/Geotechnical Engineering and Environmental Services, both with anticipated services related to Climate Adaptation and Action Plan implementation projects.

In May 2022, one SOQ was received for Coastal Engineering/Geotechnical Engineering services and independently evaluated by a Selection Committee consisting of the City Administrator and Public Works Director. The SOQ was submitted by Haro Kasunich & Associates (HKA) who have extensive local knowledge of Carmel Beach and the surrounding shoreline and are extremely well qualified to participate in this Project.

Initial communications with HKA revealed that while they are very interested in the Project and most capable of performing the required engineering and infrastructure cost estimating services, environmental and climate adaptation experts will also be required to provide the full scope of the Project as outlined in the Climate Adaptation Plan.

Next, nine SOQs received for Environmental Services were independently evaluated by a Selection Committee consisting of the Public Works Director and Environmental Programs Manager. EMC Planning Group was determined to be best qualified to provide climate adaptation project management and technical reviews for this Project. EMC included a key subconsultant, Integral Consulting, on their team to provide hazard modeling, shoreline change analysis, and technical policy review.

City staff held a series of meetings with representatives of all three firms to review the scope of the City’s projects and requested that these firms consolidate into one team so that the City could enter into one Professional Services Agreement (Agreement).

As a result, EMC has been recommended as the lead firm to contract with the City for this project and for consistency over the long term for possible subsequent projects. HKA and Integral will perform a majority of the technical work for the project, while EMC will provide policy guidance and project management. This team has worked together in the past on similar projects, including: the 2019 West Cliff Drive Adaptation and Management Plan for the City of Santa Cruz, and the 2019 City of Marina’s Existing Conditions and Sea Level Rise Reports.

Project Scope of Work
To develop the project’s scope of work, the Consultant team performed a cursory review of the 2001 Coastal Development Permit for Scenic Road Armoring Repairs, 2003 Shoreline Management Plan (Shonman and D’Ambrosio), the 2016 Carmel Shoreline Assessment Update, 2016 Assessments of Shoreline Improvements at Carmel Beach (Easton Geology), and the City’s 2022 Climate Adaptation and Climate Action Plans.

The work is proposed to be completed in two phases. Phase I of the project is funded in the current CIP and included in the Agreement in Attachment 2, while Phase 2 is not yet funded. Staff has identified a noncompetitive California Coastal Commission grant of $100,000 for which this project is eligible. Staff would work with the consultant team to develop and submit the grant application. Council would approve the receipt of grant funds, and authorize an Amendment to this Agreement, before any work would begin on Phase 2. Key tasks and associated deliverables for both phases are outlined below:

PHASE 1 – COASTAL ENGINEERING AND HAZARD ASSESSMENT (Funded) Task 1 – Coastal Engineering Condition Evaluation
o Deliverables: Technical memo of results with maps and GIS shapefiles, one Climate Committee presentation.

Task 2 -Shoreline and Beach Change Analysis – Seasonal and Long Term o Technical memo of results with maps and relevant GIS shapefiles, one Climate Committee presentation.

Task 3 – Shoreline and Beach Erosion Exposure Modeling
o Technical memo of methods and maps showing results of the projected existing and future coastal hazard extents, one Climate Committee presentation.

Task 4 – Coastal Hazard and Sea Level Rise Vulnerability, High Priority Adaptation, Identification, and Action Plan
o Executive summary of results, up to five sector profile summaries (land use, transportation, utilities, etc.), tables summarizing feasibility, recommendations for policy and project approaches, and identify high priority adaptations, one Climate Committee presentation.

PHASE 2 – HAZARDS POLICY REVIEW AND REVISIONS, OUTREACH, AND ADAPTATION PATHWAY DEVELOPMENT (Subject to Grant funding)
Task 1 – Policy Review and Revised Hazard Policies
o Memo summarizing the City’s existing coastal hazard policies, technical work and adaptation feasibility completed in Phase I, policy recommendations for climate adaptation, triggers and thresholds recommendations for policy implementation, and recommendations for Local Coastal Program (LCP) updates, and one Climate Committee presentation.

Task 2 - Public Outreach and Engagement
o Technical content and PowerPoint slides for input into presentations by City Staff.

Task 3 - Adaptation Pathway Development
o Technical memo on monitoring needs and adaptation pathway graphics for each section, one Climate Committee presentation.

At their September 15, 2022 meeting, the Climate Committee reviewed the consultant’s proposed project scope of work and recommended its approval by the City Council. During the meeting, the Climate Committee members discussed the importance of public engagement. In order to conserve budget, staff is proposing to take the lead on public engagement, including presenting results of specific tasks to the Forest and Beach Commission, Planning Commission, and City Council, as appropriate.

Schedule
Phase 1 is anticipated to take up to 16 months to complete upon approval of the Professional Services Agreement and issuance of the Notice to Proceed. Phase 2 is also anticipated to take up to 16 months to complete, but is anticipated to be performed somewhat concurrently with Phase 1, subject to approval and timing of the LCP Grant.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Consultant fees for the project are $175,000 for services to be performed in Phase 1 and $100,000 for Phase 2.

Funding for Phase 1 in the amount of $175,000 is available in the FY 2022/23 CIP Budget from a combination of $150,000 for the Coastal Engineering Study plus $25,000 for the Beach Sand Survey Project which was carriedover from FY 2021/22. Thus, the total budget amount authorized for this Agreement is $175,000 and will be charged to the CIP account no. 301-311-00-43008.

Funding for Phase 2 is anticipated to come from a non-competitive California Coastal Commission LCP Grant in the amount of $100,000. Work will not be authorized to begin on Phase 2 until the grant is accepted by the City Council.

PRIOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION:

In June 2022, City Council approved the Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP budget, which included a Sea Level Rise/Coastal Engineering Report and a Beach Sand Survey and Wall Inspections. At their August 2, 2022 meeting, City Council adopted the City’s Climate Adaptation Plan and Climate Action Plan under Resolution 2022-064. The Coastal Engineering Report is identified as a high-priority project in the Climate Adaptation Plan.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1) Resolution 2022-094
Attachment 2) Professional Services Agreement with EMC Planning Group for the Coastal Engineering and Adaptation Planning Project

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-094

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH EMC PLANNING GROUP INC., FOR A NOT-TO-EXCEED FEE OF $175,000, TO CONDUCT THE COASTAL ENGINEERING AND ADAPTATION PLANNING

PROJECT
WHEREAS, in June 2022, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Capital Improvement Plan budget, including a Sea Level Rise/Coastal Engineering Report project and a Beach Sand Survey and Wall Inspection project, with a combined budget of $175,000; and, WHEREAS, in August 2022, the City Council adopted the City’s Climate Adaptation Plan, which identifies the development of a Sea Level Rise Coastal Vulnerability Study as a high-priority project; and,
WHEREAS, through a rigorous evaluation process, staff identified EMC Planning Group, with Haro Kasunich and Associates and Integral Consulting as subconsultants, as the most qualified team to conduct this Coastal Engineering and Adaptation Planning project; and, WHEREAS, the consultant team developed a phased scope of work to complete the Coastal Engineering and Adaptation Planning project, with Phase 1 including a Coastal Engineering and Hazard Assessment, and Phase 2 including Hazards Policy Reviews, Outreach and Adaptation Pathway Development; and,
WHEREAS, in September 2022, the Climate Committee reviewed the proposed scope of work and schedule and recommended its approval by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, Phase I of the project is funded in the current Capital Improvement Plan, while Phase 2 is eligible to be funded by a non-competitive California Coastal Commission grant.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA DOES HEREBY:

Authorize the City Administrator to execute a Professional Services Agreement with EMC Planning Group Inc., for a not-to-exceed fee of $175,000, to conduct the Coastal Engineering and Adaptation Planning Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL-BYTHE-SEA this 1st day of November, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

Attachment 1
Resolution No. 2022-094

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED: ATTEST:
_________________________ _________________________
Dave Potter Nova Romero, MMC
Mayor City Clerk
Attachment 1
1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
for the
Coastal Engineering and Adaptation Planning Project
Agreement #
THIS AGREEMENT is executed this ____ day of November, 2022, by and between the City of CarmelBy-The-Sea, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter "City"), and EMC Planning Group Inc., (hereinafter "Consultant"), collectively referred to herein as the “parties”.

WHEREAS, the City wishes to engage Consultant to perform the services required by this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Consultant is willing to render such professional services, as hereinafter defined, on the following terms and conditions; and
WHEREAS, Consultant represents that it is trained, experienced and competent and holds all necessary licenses and certifications to perform the services required by this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions herein contained, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows:

1. SERVICES
A. Scope of Services. Consultant agrees to provide to the City, as the scope of services (“Scope of Services”) under this Agreement, the following: coastal engineering and hazard assessment for sea level rise and climate adaptation planning. The Scope of Services for this Agreement is the first phase of a multi-phase adaptation planning project. The Scope of Services is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” The Scope of Services under this Agreement should include, but is not limited to, a project description, project phases, task descriptions, identification of key personnel, identification of subconsultants, their key personnel and general description of services that will be performed, as further set forth in this Agreement and attachments hereto.

Consultant agrees to all of the following:
i. Consultant will furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space and facilities, and all tests, testing and analyses, calculations, and all other means whatsoever, except as otherwise expressly specified in this Agreement, necessary to perform the services required of Consultant under this Agreement. ii. Consultant’s designated representative(s) who are authorized to act on its behalf and to make all decisions in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement are listed in Exhibit “B,” Key Personnel and Subconsultants, which is made a part of this Agreement.
iii. Consultant must make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s key personnel and subcontractors, if any, listed in Exhibit B to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant must notify City and obtain City’s Attachment 2
2 written approval with respect of any changes in key personnel prior to the performance of any services by replacement personnel.
iv. Consultant must obtain City’s prior written approval before utilizing any subconsultants to perform any services under this Agreement. This written approval must include the identity of the subconsultant and the terms of compensation. v. Consultant represents that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Consultant will at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described in this Agreement.

In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Consultant must employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to those required of Consultant under this Agreement. vi. City may inspect and accept or reject any of Consultant’s work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. Acceptance of any of Consultant’s work by City will not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. vii. The Consultant must maintain any work site in the City in a safe condition, free of hazards to persons and property resulting from its operations.

B. Change Orders.
i. Agreements and Change Orders exceeding $24,999 require City Council approval to be valid.
ii. The City may order changes to the Scope of Services, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the compensation to be paid Consultant will be adjusted accordingly.

All such changes must be authorized in writing, and executed by Consultant and City. The cost or credit to City resulting from changes in the services will be determined by the written agreement between the parties. However, any increase in compensation beyond the compensation limit amount approved by the City Council must be authorized in advance by the City Council and any service provided by Consultant in the absence of such approval are at Consultant’s sole risk.
iii. Consultant will not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement that are in addition to or outside of those set forth in the Scope of Services or otherwise required by this Agreement, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by City. iv. If Consultant believes that additional services are needed to complete the Scope of Services, Consultant will provide the City Representative with written notification describing the proposed additional services, the reasons for such services, and a detailed proposal regarding cost.

Attachment 2
3 C. Familiarity with Services and Site.
i. By executing this Agreement, Consultant represents that Consultant:
a. has thoroughly investigated and considered the Scope of Services to be performed; b. has carefully considered how the services should be performed; c. understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement; and
d. possesses all licenses required under local, state or federal law to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement, and will maintain all required licenses during the performance of this Agreement.
ii. If services involve work upon any site, Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, before commencing its services.

Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions that may materially affect the performance of services, Consultant will immediately inform District of such fact and will not proceed except at Consultant’s own risk until written instructions are received from City.

2. COMPENSATION
A. Total Fee. Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, the City agrees to pay and Consultant agrees to accept as full and fair consideration for the performance of this Agreement, hourly fees as set forth in Consultant’s Compensation & Fee Schedule (Exhibit “C”), in a total amount not-to-exceed One Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($175,000.00). Such compensation is the “Maximum Authorized Expenditure” under this Agreement. The Fee Schedule includes, but is not limited to, fees for each phase and task, not-to-exceed total fee, hourly rates, reimbursable rates and subconsultant mark-up rates. The use of subconsultants will not be considered a reimbursable expense, and such costs must be applied towards the approved budgeted amount. Payment of any compensation to Consultant is contingent upon performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement to the satisfaction of the City. If the City determines that the Services set forth in the written invoice have not performed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the City is not responsible for payment until the Services have been satisfactorily performed.

B. Invoicing. Consultant must submit to the City monthly written invoices to the City’s Project Representative, identified in Section 5 below. Invoices must be prepared in a form satisfactory to the City, describing the services rendered and associated costs for the period covered by the invoice. The City will provide invoicing format upon request. Consultant may not bill the City for duplicate services performed by more than one person. Consultant’s invoices must include, but are not limited to, the following information:
i. Project Title, the City’s Purchase Order number and City’s Project Code(s) for each project; ii. Invoice number and date;
iii. A brief description of services performed for each project phase and/or task; Attachment 2
4 iv. The budgeted amount for each phase, task and item, including the total amount, with the same for approved Change Orders, if any;
v. Amount invoiced to date divided by the agreed total compensation, expressed as a percentage, with the same for approved Change Orders, if any; vi. The amount earned and invoiced to date for each phase, task and/or item, including the total amount, with the same for approved Change Orders, if any; vii. The amount previously invoiced for each phase, task and/or item, including the total amount, with the same for approved Change Orders, if any; viii. The amount due for the period covered by this invoice for each phase, task, and/or item, including the total amount, with the same for approved Change Orders, if any; ix. For time and materials authorizations, the number of hours spent, by whom and their hourly rate for each phase, task and/or item, including the total amount; x. The costs incurred, including reimbursables, for each phase, task, and/or item for the agreed total compensation and approved Change Orders, if any, along with a brief description of those costs;
xi. The total amount due for the period covered by this invoice, including subconsultants and vendors of services or goods;
xii. Copies of subconsultant, vendor, and reimbursable invoices including hourly breakdowns when requested by City.
xiii. Copies of subconsultant and vendor lien releases.

Any such invoices must be in full accord with any and all applicable provisions of this Agreement.

Consultant must submit invoices to the City on or before the sixteenth (16th) day of each month for services performed in the preceding month.

The City will review each invoice submitted by Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice will be approved and paid.

Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant that are disputed by City, the City will pay on each such invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt; provided, however, that if Consultant submits an invoice which is incorrect, incomplete, or not in accord with the provisions of this Agreement, or if any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the invoice will be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission, and the City will not be obligated to process any payment to Consultant until thirty (30) days after a correct and complying invoice has been submitted by Consultant. Payment to Consultant for services performed under this Agreement may not be deemed to waive any defects in the services performed by Consultant, even if such defects were known to City at the time of Attachment 2
5 payment. City reserves the right to withhold future payment to Consultant if any aspect of the Consultant’s work is found to be non-conforming to the terms of this Agreement.

The City is not obligated to pay Consultant a greater percentage of the Maximum Authorized Expenditure than the actual percentage of services completed as of the invoice date.

Consultant agrees to remit and is responsible for all withholding taxes, income taxes, unemployment insurance deductions, and any other deductions required by applicable federal, state or local laws and regulations for Consultant, its employees, subconsultants and vendors of services or goods.

C. Adjustment of Maximum Authorized Expenditure. The City may increase or decrease the Maximum Authorized Expenditure by issuing a Change Order to the Agreement in accordance with Section 1.B “Change Orders” above. Should Consultant consider that any request or instruction from the City’s Project Representative constitutes a change in the scope of services, Consultant will advise the City’s Project Representative, in writing, within fourteen (14) calendar days of such request or instruction. Without said written advice within the time period specified, the City is not obligated to make any payment of additional compensation to Consultant.

D. Hourly Rates. Payment for all authorized services, including payment for authorized on-call, asneeded services, will be made by the City to Consultant in accordance with the various hourly rates as set forth in the Consultant’s Compensation & Fee Schedule (Exhibit “C”).

E. Subconsultants and Vendors. Invoices for subconsultants and vendors of services or goods will be paid by the City to Consultant in accordance with the various rates as set forth in the Consultant’s Compensation & Fee Schedule (Exhibit “C”). All reimbursable expenses will be considered as included within the Maximum Authorized Expenditure. Consultant is solely responsible for payment to subconsultants and vendors of services or goods, and the City is not responsible or liable for any payments to subconsultants and vendors, either directly or indirectly.

F. Audit and Examination of Accounts:
i. Consultant must keep and will cause any assignee or subconsultant under this Agreement to keep accurate books of records and accounts, in accordance with sound accounting principles, which pertain to services to be performed under this Agreement. ii. Any audit conducted of books of records and accounts must be kept in accordance with generally accepted professional standards and guidelines for auditing. iii. Consultant must disclose and make available any and all information, reports, books of records or accounts pertaining to this Agreement to the City and any city of the County of Monterey, or other federal, state, regional or governmental agency which provides funding for these Services.
iv. Consultant must include the requirements of Section 2F, “Audit and Examination of Accounts”, in all contracts with assignees or subconsultants under this Agreement.

Attachment 2
6 v. All records provided for in this Section are to be maintained and made available throughout the performance of this Agreement and for a period of not less than four (4) years after full completion of the Services. All records, which pertain to actual disputes, litigation, appeals or claims, must be maintained and made available for a period of not less than four (4) years after final resolution of such disputes, litigation, appeals or claims.

3. AGREEMENT TERM
A. Term. The work under this Agreement will commence by November 2, 2022 and must be completed by June 30, 2024 unless sooner terminated or the City grants an extension of time in writing pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, except for provisions in this Agreement that will survive the termination or completion of this Agreement. Consultant will perform Change Order services as set out in Section 1.B, “Amendment of Services (Change Orders)”, in a timely manner or in accordance with the agreed upon Change Order Project Schedule.

B. Timely Work. Consultant will perform all Services in a timely fashion, as set forth more specifically in Section 3.A, “Term”, and Section 3.C, “Project Schedule”, of this Agreement.

Failure to perform is deemed a material breach of this Agreement, and the City may terminate this Agreement with no further liability hereunder, or may authorize, in writing, an extension of time to the Agreement.

C. Project Schedule. Services must be completed by Consultant in accordance with the Project Schedule set forth in Exhibit “D”. The parties may, from time to time, by Change Order, alter the Project Schedule. Consultant will provide the Services pursuant to the Project Schedule or any applicable Project Schedule Change Order. If at any time Consultant discovers that the Project Schedule cannot be met, Consultant must promptly notify the City in writing and provide a revised Project Schedule for review and consideration by City.

D. Notice to Proceed. Upon execution of this Agreement by both parties and the receipt of all documentation required by this Agreement to be provided by Consultant to the City, including proof of insurance and tax identification numbers, the City will issue a written Notice to Proceed to the Consultant. The City may, in its sole discretion, issue subsequent notices from time to time regarding further portions or phases of the work. Upon receipt of such notices, Consultant will diligently proceed with the Services authorized and complete those Services within the agreed time specified in said notice. Consultant will not proceed with any of the Services unless they have received a Notice to Proceed from the City.

4. CONSULTANT’S EMPLOYEES AND SUBCONSULTANTS
A. Listed Employees and Subconsultants. Consultant will perform the Services using the individuals listed in the Key Employees and Subconsultants List attached hereto in Exhibit “B”.

B. Substitution of Employees or Subconsultants:

Attachment 2
7 i. Consultant may not substitute any key employee or subconsultant listed in Exhibit “B” without the prior written approval of the City, and such approval will not be unreasonably withheld. The City will not approve removal or substitution of employees or subconsultants for the reason that Consultant or its affiliates has called on such individuals to perform services for another client of the Consultant.
ii. If, at any time, the City reasonably objects to the performance, experience, qualifications or suitability of any of Consultant’s employees or subconsultants, then Consultant may, upon written request from the City, replace such employee or subconsultant. Consultant must, subject to scheduling and staffing considerations, make reasonable efforts to replace the individual with an individual of similar competency and experience. iii. Whether or not the City consents to, or requests a substitution of any employee or subconsultant of Consultant, the City will not be liable to pay additional compensation to Consultant for any replacement or substitution.

C. Sub-agreements with Subconsultants. Consultant will incorporate the terms and conditions of this Agreement into all sub-agreements with subconsultants in respect of the Services necessary to preserve all rights of the City under this Agreement. Consultant isfully responsible to the City of all acts and omissions of subconsultants and of persons employed by any subconsultant.

D. Not an Agent of the City. Nothing in this Agreement will be interpreted to render the City the agent, employer, or partner of Consultant, or the employer of anyone working for or subcontracted by Consultant, and Consultant must not do anything that would result in anyone working for or subcontracted by Consultant being considered an employee of the City.

Consultant is not, and must not claim to be, an agent of the City.

E. Independent Contractor:
i. Consultant is an independent contractor. This Agreement does not create the relationship of employer and employee, a partnership, or a joint venture. The City may not control or direct the details, means, methods or processes by which Consultant performs the Services.

Consultant is responsible for performance of the Services and may not delegate or assign any Services to any other person except as provided for in this Agreement. Consultant is solely liable for the work quality and conditions of any partners, employees and subconsultants.
ii. No offer or obligation of permanent employment with the City or particular City department or agency is intended in any manner, and Consultant may not become entitled by virtue of this Agreement to receive from the City any form of employee benefits including but not limited to sick leave, vacation, retirement benefits, workers’ compensation coverage, insurance or disability benefits. Consultant will be solely liable for and obligated to pay directly all applicable taxes, including federal and state income taxes and social security, arising out of Consultant’s performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant will defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all liability, which the City may incur because of Consultant’s failure to pay such taxes.

Attachment 2
8 5. REPRESENTATIVES AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. City’s Project Representative. The City appoints the individual named below as the City’s Project Representative for the purposes of this Agreement (“City’s Project Representative”). The City may unilaterally change its project representative upon notice to Consultant.

Name: Agnes Martelet
Title: Environmental Compliance Manager
Address: PO Box CC, Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA 93921
Telephone: (831) 620-2078
Email: [email protected]
B. Consultant’s Project Manager. Consultant appoints the person named below as its Project Manager for the purposes of this Agreement (“Consultant’s Project Manager”).

Name: Polaris Kinison Brown
Title: Principal Planner
Company: EMC Planning Group Inc.

Address: 601 Abrego Street, Monterey, CA 93940
Telephone: (831) 649-1799
Email: [email protected]
C. Meet and Confer. Consultant agrees to meet and confer with the City’s Project Representative, its agents or employees with regard to Services as may be required by the City to insure timely and adequate performance of this Agreement.

D. Communications and Notices. All communications between the City and Consultant regarding this Agreement, including performance of Services, will be between the City’s Project Representative and Consultant’s Project Manager. Any notice, report, or other document that either party may be required or may wish to give to the other must be in writing and will be validly given to and received by the addressee, if delivered personally, on the date of such personal delivery, if delivered by email, on the date of transmission, or if by mail, seven (7) calendar days after posting.

6. INDEMNIFICATION
Consultant hereby agrees to the following indemnification clause:

To the fullest extent permitted by law (including, without limitation, California Civil Code Sections 2782 and 2782.6), Consultant will defend (with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the City), indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, designated agents, departments, officials, representatives and employees (collectively "Indemnitees") from and against claims, loss, cost, Attachment 2
9 damage, injury expense and liability (including incidental and consequential damages, Court costs, reasonable attorneys' fees as may be determined by the Court, litigation expenses and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation) to the extent they arise out of, pertain to, or relate to, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, any subconsultant or subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, or anyone that they control (collectively "Liabilities"). Such obligations to defend, hold harmless and indemnify any Indemnitee will not apply to the extent that such Liabilities are caused in part by the active negligence or willful misconduct of such Indemnitee.

Notwithstanding the provisions of the above paragraph, Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from and against all claims, demands, defense costs, liability, expense, or damages arising out of or in connection with damage to or loss of any property belonging to Consultant or Consultant's employees, subconsultants, representatives, patrons, guests or invitees.

In no event will the obligation of the Consultant exceed the limitations on the duty to defend and indemnify as set forth in Civil Code Sections 2782, 2782.6, and 2782.8.

7. INSURANCE
Consultant must submit and maintain in full force all insurance as described herein. Without altering or limiting Consultant's duty to indemnify, Consultant must maintain in effect throughout the term of this Agreement a policy or policies of insurance with the following minimum limits of liability:

A. Commercial General Liability Insurance including but not limited to premises, personal injuries, bodily injuries, property damage, products, and completed operations, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate.

B. Professional Liability Insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim and $2,000,000 in the aggregate. Consultant will have a policy for professional liability coverage that provides coverage on an occurrence basis or obtain extended reporting (tail) coverage (with the same liability limits) for at least three years following the City's acceptance of the work.

C. Automobile Liability Insurance covering all automobiles, including owned, leased, non-owned, and hired automobiles, used in providing Services under this Agreement, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.

D. Workers' Compensation Insurance. If Consultant employs others in the performance of this Agreement, Consultant must maintain Workers' Compensation insurance in accordance with California Labor Code section 3700 and with a minimum of $1,000,000 per occurrence.

E. Other Insurance Requirements:
i. All insurance required under this Agreement must be written by an insurance company either:
a. admitted to do business in California with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:VI; or
Attachment 2
10 b. an insurance company with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:VII.

Exception may be made for the State Compensation Insurance Fund when not specifically rated.
ii. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement may not be canceled, except with prior written notice to the City.
iii. All liability and auto policies must:
a. Provide an endorsement naming the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or both CG 20 10 and CG 23 37 forms if later revisions used).
b. Provide that such Consultant’s insurance is primary as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea is excess to the Consultant’s insurance and will not contribute with it.
c. Contain a “Separation of Insureds” provision substantially equivalent to that used in the ISO form CG 00 01 10 01 or their equivalent.
d. Provide for a waiver of any subrogation rights against the City via an ISO CG 24 01 10 93 or its equivalent.
iv. Prior to the start of work under this Agreement, Consultant will file certificates of insurance and endorsements evidencing the coverage required by this Agreement with the City. Consultant will file a new or amended certificate of insurance promptly after any change is made in any insurance policy which would alter the information on the certificate then on file.
v. Neither the insurance requirements hereunder, nor acceptance or approval of Consultant’s insurance, nor whether any claims are covered under any insurance, may in any way modify or change Consultant’s obligations under the indemnification clause in this Agreement, which will continue in full force and effect. All coverage available to the Consultant as named insured will also be available and applicable to the additional insured. Notwithstanding these insurance requirements, Consultant is financially liable for its indemnity obligations under this Agreement.
vi. All policies must be written on a first dollar coverage basis or contain a deductible provision. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions (“SIR”) must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insured will reduce or eliminate such deductibles or SIR as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or Consultant will provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses. In no event will any SIR or insurance policy contain language, whether added by endorsement or contained in the policy conditions, that prohibits satisfaction Attachment 2
11 of any self-insured provision or requirement by anyone other than the named insured, or by any means including other insurance, or which is intended to defeat the intent or protection of an additional insured.
vii. City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. viii. Consultant must require and verify that all subconsultants and subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements in this Agreement. ix. If Consultant, for any reason, fails to have in place at all times during the term of this Agreement all of the required insurance coverage, the City may, but is not obligated to, obtain such coverage at Consultant’s expense and deduct the cost from the sums due Consultant. Alternatively, City may terminate the Agreement. x. The existence of the required insurance coverage under this Agreement will not be deemed to satisfy or limit Consultant’s indemnity obligations under this Agreement.

Consultant acknowledges that the insurance coverage and policy limits set forth in this Agreement constitute the minimum coverage and policy limits required. Should any coverage carried by the Consultant or any subcontractor of any tier have limits of liability that exceed the limits or have broader coverage than required in this Agreement, those higher limits and that broader coverage are deemed to apply for the benefit of any person or organization included as an additional insured and those limits and broader coverage will become the required minimum limits and insurance coverage in all sections of this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds available to City in excess of the limits and coverages required by this Agreement, and which is applicable to a given loss, must be made available to City to compensate it for such losses.
xi. Consultant must give City prompt notice of claims made of lawsuits initiated that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability insurance policies. xii. The Consultant hereby waives any right of subrogation that any of its insurers may have or that they may accrue out of the payment of any claim related to the Consultant’s performance of this Agreement, regardless of whether any endorsements required by this section are obtained.

8. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
A. Consultant warrants that Consultant and Consultant’s agents, employees, and subconsultants performing Services under this Agreement are specially trained, experienced, and competent and have the degree of specialized expertise contemplated within California Government Code Section 37103, and further, are appropriately licensed to perform the work and deliver the Services required under this Agreement.

B. Consultant, its agents, employees, and subconsultants must perform all Services in a safe and skillful manner consistent with the usual and customary standards of care, diligence and skill ordinarily exercised by professional consultants in similar fields in accordance with sound Attachment 2
12 professional practices. All work product of Consultant must comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations, ordinances and codes. Consultant also warrants that it is familiar with all laws that may affect its performance of this Agreement and will advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect Consultant’s performance of this Agreement. All Services performed under this Agreement that are required by law to be performed or supervised by licensed personnel must be performed in accordance with such licensing requirements.

C. Consultant must furnish, at its own expense, all materials, equipment and personnel necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. Consultant may not use the City premises, property (including equipment, instruments, or supplies) or personnel for any purpose other than in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement.

D. Consultant agrees to perform all work under this Agreement to the satisfaction of City and as specified herein. The City’s Project Representative or his or her designee will evaluate the work.

If the quality of work is not satisfactory, City in its discretion may meet with Consultant to review the quality of work and resolve the matters of concern, and may require Consultant to repeat the work at no additional fee until it is satisfactory.

9. CITY INFORMATION AND RESOURCES
A. Available Information. The City will make available to Consultant all relevant information, plans, maps, reports, specifications, standards and pertinent data which is in the hands of the City and is required by Consultant to perform the Services. Consultant may rely upon the accuracy and completeness of such information and data furnished by the City, except where it is stated otherwise or unreasonable.

B. City Resources. The City acknowledges that Consultant’s ability to provide the Services in accordance with this Agreement may be dependent on the City providing available information and resources in a prompt and timely manner as reasonably required by Consultant. To the extent that the City fails to provide City resources, Consultant will not be liable for any resulting delay in the Services or failure to meet the Project Schedule, but in no event will such delay or failure to provide City resources constitute a breach of this Agreement by the City, nor will Consultant be entitled to extra compensation for same. Consultant’s sole remedy shall be an extension of time to complete the Scope of Services.

C. Obligations of Consultant. No reviews, approvals, or inspections carried out or supplied by the City will derogate from the duties and obligations of Consultant, and all responsibility related to performance of the Services will be and remain with Consultant.

10. OWNERSHIP AND USE OF MATERIALS
A. Ownership of the Materials. All data, studies, reports, calculations, field notes, sketches, designs, drawings, plans, specifications, cost estimates, manuals, correspondence, agendas, minutes, notes, audio-visual materials, photographs, models, software data, computer software (if purchased on the City’s behalf) and other documents or products produced by Consultant under this Agreement (collectively, “the Materials”) are and will remain the property of the City even though Consultant or another party may have physical possession of them or a portion Attachment 2
13 thereof. Consultant hereby waives, in favor of the City, any moral rights Consultant, its employees, subconsultants, vendors, successors or assignees may have in the Materials.

B. No Patent or Copyright Infringement. Consultant guarantees that in its creation of the Materials produced under this Agreement, no federal or state patent or copyright laws were violated.

Consultant agrees that all copyrights, which arise from creation of the work or Services pursuant to this Agreement, will be vested in the City and waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or intellectual property rights in favor of the City. Consultant covenants that it will defend, indemnify and hold City harmless from any claim or legal action brought against the City for alleged infringement of any patent or copyright related to City’s use of Materials produced by Consultant and its employees, agents and subconsultants under this Agreement.

C. Delivery and Use of the Materials. All Materials will be transferred and delivered by Consultant to the City without further compensation following the expiration or sooner termination of this Agreement, provided that the City may, at any time prior to the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement, give written notice to Consultant requesting delivery by Consultant to the City of all or any part of the Materials in which event Consultant must forthwith comply with such request. The Materials created electronically must be submitted in a format and medium acceptable to the City. The Materials may be used by the City in any manner for the intended purpose or as part of its operations associated with the Materials.

D. Survival of Ownership and Use Provisions. The provisions contained in Section 10, Ownership and Use of Materials, survives the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement, and that this Section is severable for such purpose.

E. Additional Copies. If the City requires additional copies of reports, or any other material that Consultant is required to furnish as part of the Services under this Agreement, Consultant must provide such additional copies, and the City will compensate Consultant for the actual costs related to the production of such copies by Consultant.

11. CONFIDENTIALITY
A. No Disclosure. Consultant must keep confidential and may not disclose, publish or release any information, data, or confidential information of the City to any person other than representatives of the City duly designated for that purpose in writing by the City. Consultant may not use for Consultant’s own purposes, or for any purpose other than those of the City, any information, data, or confidential information Consultant may acquire as a result of the performance of the Services under this Agreement. Consultant must promptly transmit to the City any and all requests for disclosure of any such confidential information or records. The obligations under this Section will survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.

B. California Public Records Act. Consultant acknowledges that the City is subject to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250 et seq.), known as the “PRA”, and agrees to any disclosure of information by the City as required by law. Consultant further acknowledges that it may have access to personal information as defined under the PRA, and Consultant will Attachment 2
14 not use any such personal information for any purposes other than for the performance of Services under this Agreement without the advance written approval of the City.

All Scopes of Services and related documents received will be public records, with the exception of those elements, identified by the Consultant as business trade secrets and are plainly marked “Trade Secret”, “Confidential” or “Proprietary”. If disclosure is required under the PRA or otherwise by law, the City will not be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any such records and the Consultant will indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless for any such disclosure.

12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Consultant covenants that neither Consultant, nor any officer, principal or employee of its firm, has or will acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, that would conflict in any manner with the interests of City relating to this Agreement or that would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant’s attention is directed to the conflict of interest rules applicable to governmental decision-making contained in the Political Reform Act (California Government Code Section 87100 and following) and its implementing regulations (California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 18700 et seq.), and California Government Code section 1090.

Consultant is required to file a Form 700 in compliance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code unless a written determination by the City Administrator is made modifying or eliminating said requirement, or unless otherwise exempted by law.

In addition, Consultant, Consultant’s employees, and subconsultants agree as follows:

A. That they will conduct their duties related to this Agreement with impartiality, and must, if they exercise discretionary authority over others in the course of those duties, disqualify themselves from dealing with anyone with whom a relationship between them could bring the impartiality of Consultant or its employees into question;
B. May not influence, seek to influence, or otherwise take part in a decision of the City knowing that the decision may further their private interests;
C. May not accept any commission, discount, allowance, payment, gift, or other benefit connected, directly or indirectly, with the performance of Services related to this Agreement, that causes, or would appear to cause, a conflict of interest;
D. May have no financial interest in the business of a third party that causes, or would appear to cause, a conflict of interest in connection with the performance of the Services related to this Agreement, and if such financial interest is acquired during the term of this Agreement, Consultant must promptly declare it to the City;
E. May not, during the term of this Agreement, perform a service for, or provide advice to, any person, firm, or corporation, which gives rise to a conflict of interest between the obligations of Consultant under this Agreement and the obligations of Consultant to such other person, firm or corporation.

Attachment 2
15 13. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
A. Dispute Resolution Procedures. The parties will make reasonable efforts to promptly resolve any dispute, claim, or controversy arising out of or related to this Agreement (“Dispute”) using the Dispute Resolution Procedures set forth in this Section.

B. Negotiations. First, the City’s Project Representative and Consultant’s Project Manager will make reasonable efforts to resolve any Dispute by amicable negotiations and will provide frank, candid, and timely disclosure of all relevant facts, information, and documents to facilitate negotiations. Should these negotiations be unsuccessful in resolving the Dispute, the matter will be promptly referred to the City Administrator or designee, and the Consultant’s Principal, who will meet and confer, in good faith, to resolve the Dispute to mutual satisfaction of the parties.

C. Mediation. If all or any portion of a Dispute cannot be resolved by good faith negotiations as set forth above within thirty (30) days of the date that the matter was referred to the City Administrator pursuant to subsection B above, either party may, by notice to the other party, submit the Dispute for formal mediation to a mediator selected mutually by the parties from the Monterey Superior Court’s Court-Directed Mediator Panel list. The duration of any such mediation may not exceed 2 hours unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. The cost of the mediation (including fees of mediators) will be borne equally by the parties, and each party will bear its own costs of participating in mediation. The mediation will take place within or in close proximity to the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea.

In any mediation conducted pursuant to this section, the provisions of California Evidence Code section 1152 willl be applicable to limit the admissibility of evidence disclosed by the parties in the course of the mediation. In the event the parties are unsuccessful in resolving the dispute through the mediation process, then the parties agree that the dispute will be submitted to Binding Arbitration to a single Arbitrator in accordance with the existing Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. (JAMS) within thirty (30) days of the close of mediation as declared by the mediator.

D. Arbitration. The submission to Mediation and Arbitration in accordance with the requirements of this section of any and all agreements, differences, or controversies that may arise hereunder is made a condition precedent to the institution of any action or appeal at law or in equity with respect to the controversy involved. The award by the arbitrator will have the same force and effect and may be filed and entered, as a judgment of the Superior Court of the State of California and is subject to appellate review upon the same terms and conditions as the law permits for judgments of Superior Courts. A “Prevailing Party” will be determined in the Arbitration, and the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred, and accrued interest on any unpaid balance that may be due. Costs will include the cost of any expert employed in the preparation or presentation of any evidence. All costs incurred and reasonable attorney fees will be considered costs recoverable in that proceeding, and be included in any award.

Attachment 2
16 14. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. Termination for Cause or Default. The City reserves the right to immediately terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, if Consultant or any subconsultant defaults or fails to deliver the Services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Such termination must be in writing, setting forth the effective date of termination, and will not result in any penalty or other charges to the City, and may be issued without any prior notice. Without limitation, Consultant is in default of its obligations contained in this Agreement if Consultant, or any subconsultant:
i. Fails to perform the required Services within the term and/or in the manner provided under this Agreement;
ii. Fails to supply sufficient, properly skilled workers or proper workmanship, products, material, tools and equipment to perform the Services;
iii. Fails to observe or comply with all laws, ordinances, including all requirements of governmental or quasi-governmental authorities, including federal, state, and local government enactments, bylaws, and other regulations now or, following the date of this Agreement, in force that pertain to;
iv. Fails to observe or comply with the City’s reasonable instructions; v. Breaches the Conflict of Interest provisions of this Agreement; or vi. Otherwise violates any provision of this Agreement.

B. Termination for Convenience. The City may, at its option and sole discretion, terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, with or without cause, at any time during the Agreement Term for the convenience of the City, upon ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant.

C. Steps after Termination:
i. Upon termination of this Agreement by the City for any reason, the City will pay Consultant for satisfactorily performed Services and disbursements incurred by Consultant to the date of termination pursuant to this Agreement, less any amounts necessary to compensate the City for damages or costs incurred by the City arising from Consultant’s default. Termination will be without prejudice to any other rights or remedies the City may have.
ii. Upon receipt of written notice of termination of this Agreement by the City for any reason, Consultant must:
a. Promptly cease all Services, including Services provided by any subconsultant, unless otherwise directed by the City; and
b. Deliver to the City all the Materials provided to Consultant or prepared by or for Consultant or the City in connection with this Agreement. Such Materials are to Attachment 2
17 be delivered to the City in completed form; however, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10, Ownership and Use of Materials, herein, the City may condition payment for services rendered to the date of termination upon Consultant’s delivery to the City of such Materials.
iii. If this Agreement is terminated by the City for any reason, the City is hereby expressly permitted to assume the projects and Services, and to complete them by any means including, but not limited to, an agreement with another party.

15. LEGAL ACTION / VENUE
A. Should either party to this Agreement bring legal action against the other, the validity, interpretation and performance of this Agreement will be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California, excluding California’s choice of law rules.

B. Venue for any such action relating to this Agreement will be in Monterey County.

C. If any legal action or proceeding, including action for declaratory relief, is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party may recover reasonable attorneys’ fees as may be determined by the Arbitrator, experts’ fees, and other costs, in addition to any other relief to which the party may be entitled.

16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
A. Non-discrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, Consultant, and its subconsultants, may not unlawfully discriminate against any person because of race, religious creed, color, sex, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, age, or sexual orientation, either in Consultant’s employment practices or in the furnishing of services to recipients. Consultant further acknowledges that harassment in the workplace is not permitted in any form, and will take all necessary actions to prevent such conduct.

B. Acceptance of Services Not a Release. Acceptance by the City of the Services to be performed under this Agreement does not operate as a release of Consultant from professional responsibility for the Services performed.

C. Force Majeure. Either party is absolved from its obligation under this Agreement when and to the extent that performance is delayed or prevented, and in the City’s case, when and to the extent that its need for vehicles, materials, or Services to be supplied hereunder are reduced or eliminated by any course, except financial, for reasons beyond its control. Such reasons include, but are not limited to: earthquake, flood, epidemic, fire, explosion, war, civil disorder, act of God or of the public enemy, act of federal, state or local government, or delay in transportation to the extent that they are not caused by the party’s willful or negligent acts or omissions, and to the extent that they are beyond the party’s reasonable control.

D. Headings. The headings do not govern, limit, modify, or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions of this Agreement. The headings are for convenience only.

Attachment 2
18 E. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including the Exhibits attached hereto, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the terms, conditions, and Services and supersedes any and all prior proposals, understandings, communications, representations and agreements, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter thereof pursuant to Section 1B, “Change Order of Services”. Any Change Order to this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by both parties hereto and will prevail over any other provision of this Agreement in the event of inconsistency between them.

F. Conflict between Agreement and Exhibits. In the event of a conflict between a provision in this Agreement and a provision in an Exhibit attached to this Agreement, the provisions in this Agreement will take precedence.

G. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, and may be signed in counterparts, but all of which together will constitute one and the same Agreement.

H. Multiple Copies of Agreement. Multiple copies of this Agreement may be executed, but the parties agree that the Agreement on file in the office of the City’s City Clerk is the version of the Agreement that governs should any difference exist among counterparts of this Agreement.

I. Authority. Any individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City or Consultant represents and warrants hereby that he or she has the requisite authority to enter into this Agreement on behalf of such party and bind the party to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

J. Severability. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are held illegal, invalid or unenforceable, the enforceability of the remaining provisions will not be impaired thereby.

Limitations of liability and indemnities will survive termination of the Agreement for any cause.

If a part of the Agreement is valid, all valid parts that are severable from the invalid part remain in effect. If a part of this Agreement is invalid in one or more of its applications, the part remains in effect in all valid applications that are severable from the invalid applications.

K. Non-exclusive Agreement. This Agreement is non-exclusive and both the City and Consultant expressly reserve the right to enter into agreements with other Consultants for the same or similar services, or may have its own employees perform the same or similar services.

L. Assignment of Interest. The duties under this Agreement are not assignable, delegable, or transferable without the prior written consent of the City. Any such purported assignment, delegation, or transfer constitutes a material breach of this Agreement upon which the City may terminate this Agreement and be entitled to damages.

M. City Business License. Prior to receiving a Notice to Proceed from the City, Consultant will obtain and maintain a valid City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Business License for the duration of the Agreement. Costs associated with the license are the responsibility of Consultant.

N. Laws. Consultant agrees that in the performance of this Agreement it will comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. This Agreement will be governed by and Attachment 2
19 construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California and the City of Carmel-by-theSea.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties enter into this Agreement hereto on the day and year first above written in Carmel-by-the-Sea, California.

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA CONSULTANT
Signature Consultant Signature
Printed Name Date Printed Name Date
City Administrator
Title Title
Consultant Legal Company Name
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: _______________________________ Date: ______________________ Brian Pierik, Esq., City Attorney
ATTEST:

By: _________________________________ Date: ______________________ Nova Romero, MMC, City Clerk
Exhibit “A” Scope of Services
Exhibit “B” Key Personnel & Subconsultants
Exhibit “C” Compensation & Fee Schedule
Exhibit “D” Project Schedule
Attachment 2

EXHIBIT A
Scope of Services
This Scope of Services is to complete the first phase of a multi-phase Coastal Adaptation Planning Project. This first phase of the project focuses on coastal engineering and hazard assessment. Future Phases will include hazards policy review and revisions, outreach, and adaptation pathway development for LCP policy update. The Scope of Work is broken into several work tasks with deliverables identified.

COASTAL ENGINEERING AND HAZARD ASSESSMENT
This Phase of work is outlined in the Climate Committee Implementation Appendix, with analysis to be completed for four sections of the city shoreline:

1. Armored private properties on the bluffs at the north end (Pescadero Canyon area);

2. Mostly natural, unarmored North Dunes area;

3. Unarmored dunes along private property between 8th Ave and Del Mar Parking Lot; and

4. Mostly armored bluffs along Scenic Roach south of 8th Avenue.

Task 0 – Project Management
Grant writing support for Non-Competitive Grant funding for Phase 2 of the project. This task includes billing hours after the City issues a purchase order to complete, project administration, execution of subconsultant contracts, and internal team coordination. EMC Planning Group, as Prime, will take the lead on project management and administration.

Deliverable: Kickoff meeting and quarterly progress calls with summary notes.

Task 1 – Coastal Engineering Condition Evaluation
Previous evaluations of coastal protection structures have focused on maintenance and repair.

HKA will inventory the length, footprint, and elevations using North American Vertical Datum 1988 (NAVD88). Documentation of the position of each structure relative to Mean High Tide Line (MHTL) and High Tide Line (HTL) for use by planners when identifying agencies with jurisdiction. Using engineering judgment determine the effectiveness of restacking rip rap revetment structures and lateral/vertical extensions of both revetments and vertical seawalls.

Estimate of the existing life of structure until it ceases to adequately provide protection for the bluff and roadway. Integral will support HKA by providing mapping and GIS support while HKA will provide the written condition assessment and tabular inventory.

Deliverables: Technical memo of results with maps and GIS shapefiles, one Climate Committee presentation (remote – HKA/Integral).

Task 2 -Shoreline and Beach Change Analysis – Seasonal and Long Term Using historic imagery and topographic data sets, conduct a shoreline, bluff top and beach width change analysis to assess long term changes in beach and shoreline position. To the extent possible utilize historic data from other sources (aka Wilard Bascom), City, Coastal Attachment 2
development permits, etc. to assess seasonal changes and sand volume changes along Carmel Beach. This task will be led by Integral with technical review by HKA.

Deliverables: Technical memo of results with maps and relevant GIS shapefiles, one Climate Committee presentation (remote – HKA/Integral).

Task 3 – Shoreline and Beach Erosion Exposure Modeling
Results of Task 1 and Task 2 will feed into Task 3. Integral will conduct Coastal Hazard Exposure modeling using state of the science models including dune erosion modeling for North Dunes, and applying available cliff erosion models. HKA will provide input on the effect of erosion by existing armoring and what happens when the structures fail or are removed.

Integral lead with input on results and armoring assumptions by HKA.

Deliverables: Technical memo of methods and maps showing results of the projected existing and future coastal hazard extents, one Climate Committee presentation (remote - Integral).

Task 4 – Coastal Hazard and Sea Level Rise Vulnerability, High Priority Adaptation Identification, and Action Plan
Using results of Task 3, Integral will conduct a vulnerability assessment in GIS looking at the spatial intersection between publicly available infrastructure and asset data and the various coastal hazards. Results of this analysis will be summarized by hazard type, sea level rise in up to 5 transects including foreshore and backshore beach, coastal bluff, and roadway and whether the impact is anticipated in the near-term or long-term HKA will provide technical review and perspectives of relative risk.

Integral will summarize the wide range of possible adaptation strategies (projects and policy, green vs gray) and briefly describe the secondary consequences of each and using our professional judgement and experiences to identify adaptation strategies that should be left on the table and presented to the community for further analysis and discussion in Phase 2. We will also identify high priority adaptations that have a very good chance of needing to be implemented over the next 10 years. Some of the feasibility criteria for adaptation will include secondary consequences, regulatory viability, as well as initial construction and ongoing maintenance costs. Essentially this will identify which adaptation tools remain on the table for community discussion, which ones are ruled out, and which are of higher priority that should be expedited to the City planning and permit phase. Integral will lead this task with input on costs from HKA and EMC write up for policy approaches.

Deliverables: Executive summary of results, up to five sector profile summaries (land use, transportation, utilities, etc.), tables summarizing feasibility, recommendations for policy and project approaches, and identify high priority adaptations, one Climate Committee presentation (remote - Integral).

Attachment 2

EXHIBIT B

KEY PERSONNEL AND SUBCONSULTANTS

CONSULTANT ROLES
EMC – Prime, policy and outreach lead, adaptation pathway technical review.

Key Personnel: Polaris Kinison Brown, Principal Planner

SUBCONSULTANT ROLES
Integral –Mapping, hazard modeling, shoreline change analysis, GIS, vulnerability assessment, adaptation pathway, econ, policy tech review.

Key Personnel: David Revell, Principal
Matt Jamieson, Project Scientist
HKA - Lead coastal engineering, technical review on exposure modeling and shoreline change, engineering cost estimates, and input on feasibility of alternatives.

Key Personnel: Moses Cuprill, Principal Engineer
Attachment 2

EXHIBIT C

COMPENSATION & FEE SCHEDULE
Task Senior Principal Polaris Kinison Brown, Principal Planner Associate Planner Graphics/Mapping Admin/ Production David Revell, Principal Matt Jamieson, Project Scientist Cheryl Hapke/Chris Flanary Sam M/Tim N Sam B Moses Cuprill, Principal Engineer Staff Engineer $250 $200 $150 $95 $115 $260 $185 $216 $190 $150 $250 $115 Phase I - Coastal Engineering and Hazard Assessment
Project Management 8 30 38 $8,000 3 8 11 $2,260 8 8 $2,000 Postage/Misc (EMC) $70 $12,260 $70 $12,330 $12,330

1. Coastal Engineering Condition Evaluation 0 $0 5 24 29 $5,740 40 120 160 $23,800 Mileage (Integral, HKA) $114 $29,540 $114 $29,654 $29,654

2. Shoreline and Beach Change Analysis 0 $0 12 90 102 $19,770 4 8 12 $1,920 $21,690 $0 $21,690 $21,690

3. Shoreline and Beach Erosion Exposure Modeling 0 $0 20 100 20 90 230 $45,120 8 16 24 $3,840 $48,960 $0 $48,960 $48,960

4. Coastal Hazard and SLR Vulnerability/Priority Adaptation/Action Plan 8 8 $1,600 40 110 50 40 240 $47,550 8 16 24 $3,840 Production (Integral) $1,500 $52,990 $1,500 $54,490 $54,490 Total Phase I (Hours) 8 38 0 0 0 46 80 332 70 90 40 612 68 160 228 Total Phase I Not-to-Exceed (Cost) $2,000 $7,600 $0 $0 $0 $9,600 $20,800 $61,420 $15,120 $17,100 $6,000 $120,440 $17,000 $18,400 $35,400 $1,684 $165,440 $1,684 $167,124 $7,876 $175,000 Total
Expense Cost ($)
Labor
($)
Expenses
($)
Subtotal
($)
5%
Markup* EMC Planning Group Hours EMC Planning Group Costs Integral Hours Integral Costs HKA Hours HKA Costs Coastal Engineering and Adaptation Planning

LABOR (HOURS) EXPENSES BUDGET
EMC Planning Group Integral HKA

EXHIBIT D

PROJECT SCHEDULE
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun PHASE 1 COASTAL ENGINEERING AND HAZARD ASSESSMENT
Task 1 Coastal Engineering Condition Evaluation
a One Climate Committee Presentation
Task 2 Shoreline and Beach Change Analysis – Seasonal and Long Term a One Climate Committee Presentation
Task 3 Coastal Hazard Exposure Modeling
a One Climate Committee Presentation
Task4 Coastal Hazard and Sea Level Rise Vulnerability, High Priority Adaptation, and Action Plan a One Climate Committee Presentation
2023 TIMELINE 2022 2024

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
November 1, 2022

CONSENT AGENDA
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Nova Romero, City Clerk
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
SUBJECT:

Resolution 2022-095, Authorizing Free Use Days of the Sunset Center Theater and Lobby for the Carmel Public Library Foundation and Carmel Unified School District RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2022-095 authorizing Free Use Days of the Sunset Center Theater and Lobby for the Carmel Public Library Foundation and Carmel Unified School District.

BACKGROUND/SUMMARY:

The 2017 Agreement between the City and Sunset Cultural Center, Inc. (SCC) provides that the City shall have the right to use the theater and lobby for up to twelve (12) full days each fiscal year without charge, as long as the spaces have not already been committed to rental customers by SCC.

The Carmel Public Library Foundation (CPLF), a non-profit organization, is requesting one of the City’s free use days of the theater and lobby. CPLF plans to hold its eleventh annual fundraising benefit, on Tuesday, April 18, 2022. Proceeds from the evening will benefit CPLF, whose mission is "to fund the Carmel Public Library, to keep the doors open and to maintain the library's preeminence as a steward and cherished cultural institution on the Central Coast of California."
Carmel Unified School District (CUSD) is requesting the use of three (3) of the City's free use days of the theater and lobby for their annual district-wide choral, string, and band festivals for Spring 2023. These performances include elementary, middle and high school musicians together and showcase the developmental progression of CUSD's music programming. The parents, musicians and administration greatly appreciate holding these performances in the Sunset Center. Use of the Sunset Center for the 2023 annual music program will "provide an inspiring performance environment for our community's young musicians."
Granting the Carmel Public Library Foundation and the Carmel Unified School District free use days will result in a significant savings in facility use fees.

The Carmel Public Library Foundation and Carmel Unified School District have tentatively booked the theater and lobby for the requested dates and will confirm with Sunset Center should Council authorize the free use days.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None for this action.

PRIOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION:

Council has approved the Sunset Center Free Use days for the Carmel Public Library Foundation and the Carmel Unified School District for eight years - 2020 being an anomaly during which time the benefit was held virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1) Resolution 2022-095 Sunset Center CPLF and CUSD Request Attachment 2) CPLF Request Letter
Attachment 3) CUSD Request Letter

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-095

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

AUTHORIZING FREE USE DAYS OF THE SUNSET CENTER THEATER AND LOBBY FOR

THE CARMEL PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION AND CARMEL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City's Amended and Restated Lease Agreement with Sunset Center Cultural Center (SCC), adopted by the City Council on June 6, 2017, stipulates that the City shall have the right to use the Sunset Center theater, lobby and dressing rooms for up to twelve (12) full days (designated in the Lease Agreement as "Free Theater Days") each fiscal year without charge; and
WHEREAS, the Carmel Public Library Foundation is requesting use of the Sunset Cultural Center through the City's Free Theater Days for their 11th annual fundraising benefit; and WHERAS, Carmel Unified School District is requesting use of the Sunset Cultural Center through the City’s Free Theater Days for three (3) days to conduct their annual district-wide choral, string, and band festivals for Spring 2023; and
WHEREAS, granting the Carmel Public Library Foundation and Carmel Unified School District each Sunset Center Free Theater Days will result in significant savings in facility use fees for these organizations.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA DOES HEREBY: Authorize the Carmel Public Library Foundation to utilize one (1) of the City's Sunset Center Free Theater Days in 2023, and authorize the Carmel Unified School District to utilize three (3) of the City's Sunset Center Free Theater Days in 2023.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL-BYTHESEA this 1st day of November, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED: ATTEST:
_________________________________ ________________________________ Dave Potter, Mayor Nova Romero, MMC, City Clerk
Attachment 1
October 17, 2022
Chip Rerig City Administrator &
City Council
Carmel-by-the-Sea City Hall
P.O. Box CC
Carmel, CA 93921
Dear Mr. Rerig:

The Carmel Public Library Foundation respectfully requests consideration of our request to be granted one of the City of Carmel’s “free use days” at the Sunset Center Theater. We plan to hold our 11th annual fundraising benefit this spring: Tuesday, April 18, 2023.

Set in the beautiful Sunset Center Theater, our annual fundraising benefits highlight national renowned authors, historians and scholars. Proceeds from the evening will benefit the Carmel Public Library Foundation whose mission is to fund the Carmel Public Library, to keep the doors open and to maintain the library’s preeminence as a steward and cherished cultural institution on the Central Coast of California. Tickets to the program are typically $65 and include book sale and signing and a wine reception.

Thank you for your consideration of our request. We hope to make this a successful and profitable event furthering our mission to fund the library. Please let me know if you require any additional information or documentation.

Sincerely,
Alexandra Fallon
Alexandra Fallon
Executive Director
Cc:

Nova Romero, City Clerk
Ashlee Wright, Library Director
Lettie Bennet, CPLF President
Tara Twomey, Library Trustee President
Mary Carrieri, Sunset Center
Attachment 2
Attachment 3

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
November 1, 2022

CONSENT AGENDA
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Maxine Gullo, Ass't. City Administrator
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
SUBJECT:

Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-003 (Second Reading) - Amending Municipal Code Section 2.52.630 pertaining to eligibility for new hires to use accrued vacation leave in the first year of employment
RECOMMENDATION:

Waive the reading in full and adopt, on second reading, Ordinance 2022-003 Amending Municipal Code Section 2.52.630 pertaining to eligibility for new hires to use accrued vacation leave in the first year of employment.

BACKGROUND/SUMMARY:

The City Council for the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea (City) recently approved Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) with general and management employees represented by the Laborers’ International Union of North America, United Public Employees of California (LiUNA/UPEC) for the period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024 at the September 13, 2022 council meeting. During the negotiation process, the City agreed to recommend that the Council amend Section 2.52.630 to permit employees in their first year of City employment to use accrued vacation. The City recently hired 31.0 new employees who would otherwise not be entitled to use accrued vacation time during the upcoming holiday closure approved by Council.

Accordingly, the City believes it is appropriate to remove the requirement of completing one year of continuous service as a condition for using accrued vacation for all City employees under Section 2.52.630.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Vacation leave usage is budgeted as standard operating costs in the operating budget.

PRIOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION:

N/A
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1) Ordinance 2022-003

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-003
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.52.630 REGARDING ELIGIBILITY FOR NEW

HIRES TO USE ACCRUED VACATION LEAVE IN THE FIRST YEAR OF EMPLOYMENT WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea (City) recently approved Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) with general and management employees represented by the Laborers’ International Union of North America, United Public Employees of California (LiUNA/UPEC) for the period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024; and WHEREAS, in the MOUs between the City and LiUNA/UPEC the City agreed to recommend that the Council amend Section 2.52.630 to permit employees in their first year of City employment to use accrued vacation; and
WHEREAS, the City believes it is appropriate to remove the requirement of completing one year of continuous service as a condition for using accrued vacation for all City employees under Section 2.52.630.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.

1. The City Council of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea does hereby find that the above referenced recitals are true and correct and material to the adoption of this Ordinance.

2. The actions authorized by this Ordinance are consistent with the City’s General Plan, and the terms of the City’s MOUs with the groups represented by LiUNA/UPEC.

SECTION 2.

Section 2.52.630 is hereby amended to read:

An employee is eligible to use accrued vacation time starting from the first day of employment.

SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its adoption by the City Council of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea.

INTRODUCED at a Regular City Council Meeting on October 4, 2022.

Attachment 1
Ordinance No. 2022-003

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL-BYTHE-SEA this 1st day of November, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED: ATTEST:
_________________________ _________________________
Dave Potter Nova Romero, MMC
Mayor City Clerk
Attachment 1

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
November 1, 2022

ORDERS OF BUSINESS
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Alan Ward, Police Chief
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
SUBJECT: 2022 Car Week After Action Report
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive the 2022 Car Week After Action Report and provide staff with feedback and direction.

BACKGROUND/SUMMARY:

Since its inception, “Car Week” has evolved from being just a handful of events during the span of a week, to tens of public and private events held over the span of a week and a half on the peninsula. As a result, the peninsula has seen an increase in visitors and residents have been vocal about the resulting traffic, parking, and speedy or reckless driving issues.

This year “Car Week” took place from Friday August 12 through Sunday, August 21.This After Action Report seeks to discuss traffic and safety impacts to Carmel-by-the-Sea during Car Week, as well as a breakdown of any issues with events held in the Village, namely Acura in the Park and Prancing Ponies, and to propose mitigation tactics to counter these effects for subsequent years.

During 2020 there were no Car Week events. In 2021 the State began allowing large-scale events again, but Concours on the Avenue was the only event held in the City. This year, 2022, was the first return to “normal” year on the Peninsula for Car Week since the pandemic. 2022 EVENTS HELD IN CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
There were two permitted events held in Carmel-by-the-Sea this year: Acura in the Park and Prancing Ponies.

Acura in the Park
The Acura in the Park event, held on Tuesday, August 16, 2022 in Devendorf Park from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m, was previously a part of the larger Concours on the Avenue (COTA) event. COTA did not move forward this year due to the untimely passing of event organizer Doug Freedman. As previously stated this event was held in Devendorf Park. Ocean Avenue from Junipero Street to Mission Street, as well as Mission Street between Ocean and Sixth Avenues, were temporarily closed for event set-up which began at 12:00 a.m. Mission Street between Ocean and Sixth Avenues remained closed during the event. Because of an increase in event participants near the end of the event the event organizer requested an additional hour and this was granted by staff. Breakdown began promptly at 5:00 p.m. and there were no issues, safety or otherwise, overall with this event.

Prancing Ponies All Woman Car Show
The Prancing Ponies event was held Thursday, August 18, 2022 from 11:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. This is the 4th year this event was held in the City. Previously the event was held on Sixth Avenue between San Carlos and Lincoln Streets and Dolores Street from Ocean Avenue to the driveway of the Post Office. Because of the absence of the Tour d’Elegance - another large Ocean Avenue event, staff worked with the event organizer to move the event to Ocean Avenue for additional event visibility during Car Week. Ocean Avenue was closed from Junipero to San Carlos Street. Mission Street was also closed between Red Eagle Lane and Sixth Avenue. Event set-up began at 4:00 a.m. and event breakdown began at 3:30 p.m. and was completed by 6:00 p.m. This year, overall, the event ran smoothly having made the switch to Ocean Avenue.

There were several issues that arose during these two events and were promptly addressed/resolved:

Event music was too loud, which was addressed during the event.

Some of the participating vehicles were late arriving at the venue because they were caught in Pebble Beach Tour d’Elegance traffic as the Tour was returning from Big Sur.

Additional volunteers/security were needed for help with staging vehicles and traffic control guiding vehicles out of the event venue at the end of the event.

One of the event sponsors was handing out cannabis samples and the sponsor is currently under investigation for this activity by the DA’s office. This activity was not authorized by the City and the event organizer was unaware of the City regulations regarding cannabis as this is not a part of the special event permit review process.
2022 Car Week Concerns
Again, as in past years, Carmel-by-the-Sea was inundated with specialty vehicles known as “exotics”.

Exotics are a group of exclusive and expensive high performance vehicles owned or rented by enthusiasts and members of car clubs. “Exotic” cars have a large following and can draw substantial crowds and car enthusiast videographers who produce videos and other content for display on the internet and social media sites. Subgroups of exotics enthusiasts also enjoy demonstrating the engine power and high performance capabilities of exotic cars and similar cars designed for street racing. These enthusiasts or groups have in the past taken over streets and intersections in towns and cities to conduct illegal street races or to engage in reckless driving behavior in events called “Sideshows”. Groups and enthusiasts sometimes use messaging platforms like Twitter, Snapchat, You Tube, and/or Facebook to post videos of reckless driving and illegal car show activities. They also utilize social media to post the intended location of street racing sites with the intent to draw crowds to be spectators to dangerous acts, including speeding and burnouts through intersections. These groups have come to Carmel-by-the-Sea in the past and continue to conduct illegal “Sideshow” events all over the country.

Due to previous illegal “sideshows” in Carmel-by-the-Sea during Car Week, the City and Police Department coordinated plans to close Ocean Avenue in the evenings to deter the take over of intersections on Ocean Avenue. Carmel-by-the-Sea has become known as a location where some of the most expensive and rare exotic cars are on display and drive the streets during car week. These vehicles have come into the Village in previous years, but not to the extent that occurred this year. The high end exotics were parked on display throughout Car Week and were here in our City the entire week. People visited the City during the day to see the cars parked throughout the City. In the evenings, between 6:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Thursday - Saturday, there was a dramatic increase in people who came to video or witness the cars cruising Carmel streets with the largest crowds and cars occurring on Friday and Saturday nights.

Unlike previous years, the high end exotic cars were parked in and around the downtown area prominently presented and displayed. Because the “normal” large scale car events were not taking place, it appears the exotic cars were able to take over in prominence which brought in more people to see them displayed and driven around the City. By Friday and Saturday, there were large groups of people in town all day to view the cars, and the crowds increased into the evenings as other local events concluded. In response to past activity, the Police Department was able to control and dissipate the crowds using planned staffing of additional personnel, planned closures of Ocean Avenue, engineered controls of traffic to alleviate cruising activities, and by utilizing mutual aid from neighboring agencies, including the traffic units from STOPP (Strategic Traffic Observation and Prevention Program) made up of units from Carmel, Monterey, Marina, and Salinas Police Departments.

During Car Week, the Police Department took a “No Tolerance” approach to dangerous driving by posting warning signs at the entrance to our Village. During the week, officers conducted 123 traffic stops for various violations including; Speeding, Exhibition of Speed, Reckless Driving, Registration Violations and Modified Exhaust. Of those traffic stops, 59 traffic citations were written for various violations. The Police Department also made two DUI arrests, and arrested another seven for other crimes including assault on a peace officer and malicious mischief for throwing rocks and hitting a police vehicle.

PLANNING FOR 2023
At the conclusion of Car Week, the Police Department made an evaluation of efforts and will be looking to re-evaluate traffic calming and engineered controls, staffing and planning of events, seek direction on how Car Week may be adjusted next year and in years to come, and evaluate best practices and implement changes to our planning and event management based on the expectations of Council, residents, and the business communities.

Some ideas for direction could include:

Planning and developing a traffic/event action plan with established times for comprehensive closure of Ocean Avenue to seriously deter the cruising behavior that draws the exotics or similarly-minded car enthusiasts who come to Carmel to view and film the cars.

Working with event organizers to ensure security and non-police staffing for their events so that the Police Department can reserve resources for the evenings or other times to ensure Village security and to ensure a timely emergency response.

Working with regional and state law enforcement assets to monitor car events and social media for information on illegal car activities.

Continuation of the “No Tolerance” approach to dangerous or illegal street activity.

Consider increasing fines for certain violations of the Municipal Code during Car Week.

Continuing to work with Peninsula L.E. partners in developing mutual aid responses for partner cities, including more planned resource sharing in the City.

As part of a more comprehensive plan, creating and implementing additional signage and messaging through press, media, and social media to directly educate the public and potential visitors on Carmelby-the-Sea event activities and plans for road closures and police enforcement of traffic and parking rules.

CONCLUSION
The two Car Week events this year were well-attended and, as noted, issues were minor and promptly addressed. Staff will be working with event organizers on these for future events.

Except for the small group disturbance on Thursday, there were no significant problems that occurred as a result of large-scale “SideShow” events or street takeovers. There was, however, a great number of people on Friday and Saturday nights who flooded downtown streets to view Exotic cars driving down and parking along Ocean Avenue. As a whole, these visitors were well behaved and did not create an out-of-control environment. All of the cruising activities and crowds dissipated within a short time of implementing the traffic controls which sent cars onto side streets and away from Ocean Avenue.

Continued planning and coordinating with City departments will continue to improve the safety and success of future Car Week events.

FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A
PRIOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION:

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1) Survey Results
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/9/2022 16:35:40 A worker in 93921 Loved it. No It was okay. Yes Loved it. Loved them. Yes.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/9/2022 16:47:06 A worker in 93921 I did not like it at all.

Fancy cars are dumb. Just think of all the good
the money spent on those car could do in the
world. I do not like that the park was turned into
a Acura dealership. No I did not like it at all. No I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all.

It is wasteful and
glorifies an antiquated
mode of transpiration.

Why does it have to
be cars? Why not a
Pride event. Or a dog
show. Or an art
festival?
Again, it is gross to
see rich people
showing off their
money.

We need pedestrian calm
measures. People just wonder
into the street. It is dangerous.
9/9/2022 16:59:03 A worker in 93921 It was okay.

Cool to watch and not as bad as folks had
described it as, but also incidents of
unnecessarily loud noise and reckless behavior
(ex: cars revving/barreling down Ocean Ave)
with no city authorities in sight. No No I really liked them, but they had some significant drawbacks.

My work in public
services requires
facilitating cooperation
between the public
and community
services, and Car
Week helped as much
as hindered that. I am neutral.

I wouldn't mind larger
events if they were
managed properly by
city personnel.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

I was able to get in and out of the city for work
without too much fuss.
9/11/2022 17:22:04 A resident of 93921 Loved it. great event that brings tourism to the area No I'm indifferent No neutral They were okay.

I didn't pay much
attention- and wasn't
real clear on the
events in the evenings
on Ocean Ave
or maybe new and
different events
I like the idea of doing
something in the
evenings in the village
where people could do
after dinner strolls don't know I really can't answer- not sure if they helped 9/12/2022 8:55:46 A worker in 93921 Loved it.

This was my first car week experience and while
I do not have an interest in cars, I loved seeing
others' passion! I was impressed by the number
of cars on display throughout town and the fact
that people had travelled from around the
country to attend the event. My favorite moment
was driving out Ocean towards 1 and seeing a
group of young men/teens with lawn chairs
posted up in a driveway, excitedly waiting for the
next cool car to drive by. No Yes I have never experienced this event in past years so I don't have much context I didn't care very much about "events" - I thought the best part of car week was "spotting" cars parked randomly throughout town No interest in
organized car week
events
Have never seen
these events but
would be interested to
experience them
From what I've heard,
these are part of
Carmel's historical
tradition that seem
worthy of continuing
I'm not sure. I leave work at 5pm
and did not experience car week
at night
9/12/2022 11:02:32 A worker in 93921 It was okay.

Felt too crowded and the guests were not well
behaved. Yes It was okay. Yes Loved it. They were okay.

Didn't appreciate the
behavior of the Village
guests after dark. Apathetic.

Not sure it will attract
any better behaved
guests.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

The traffic calming measures made it less
appealing for the 'side shows.'
9/12/2022 11:45:12 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Felt less significantly lively than usual. The loss
of Concours on the Avenue was clearly felt.

The prancing ponies show didn't bring the same
energy or scale. No I walked by the event and there was nothing to really draw me in ... Yes It was okay. They were okay.

The events in town felt
like second tier after
thought events. Yes.

Car Week is a big
event for the area and
Carmel felt left out this
year. We were just a
place for people to
sleep vs being a part
of the event.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

The evenings were not disrupted by the cars
speeding through town as they have been in
the past.
9/12/2022 11:46:41 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Unchecked speeding and reckless driving all
over the village, not just on Ocean. No N/A since I did not attendNo N/A since I did not attendAssume you mean Car Week events. . We didn't attend No Event likely to attract
more traffic, speeding,
reckless driving
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Very limited due to perceived impact on
businesses. Suggest more closures around
Ocean completely shutting down causing and
create more of a walking street faire to attract
people to businesses.
9/12/2022 12:25:10 A resident of 93921 Loved it. Great cars, fun visitors. Yes Loved it. Yes Loved it. Loved them.

Great to showcase
Carmel with
interesting events. Yes. Celebrate life!
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/12/2022 12:27:02 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all. very little for locals to see this year / too much
cars racing down the neighborhood streets No did not visit it No not worth going to see previous answer Yes. it makes it something
worthwhile to see in
the village
Carpenter Street was a disaster
with loud cars racing up and
down it
the noise in the residential area and safety
issues with the cars speeding
9/12/2022 12:28:04 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Revving cars during day and evening. Concern
about pedestrians in crosswalks. Great for
business. No No They were okay.

Missed the Concours
on the Avenue. Yes.

Quality event that
seems to be an
anchor event for the
smaller events.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Good that Ocean closed in evening. Maybe
have some barriers up in the evening/night on
neighborhood streets that open to residents
only? For example (and granted, self-serving),
from Monte Verde/Seventh south to Ninth?
9/12/2022 12:28:10 A worker in 93921 It was okay.
miss Concours on the Avenue. Only car event
was Prancing Ponies which I believe to be
substandard. No knew it was there. didn't go. Yes I did not like it at all. not like the old days of COTA and the Concours d'Elegance tour/luncheon.

Those two events
were professional and
represented Carmelby-the-Sea the way
we would want our
village to show. Yes.

Carmel-by-the-Sea =
quality, high end
events
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 12:28:10 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

The Thursday event was marketing a lot of cars
for rent. Tacky. And it should have been held
on Wednesday so the farmers market on
Thursday could have been held. No Yes I did not like it at all. Yes.

The Concours event
has always been
tasteful, classy and
benefits an amazing
local charity, The
Carmel Foundation.
9/12/2022 12:28:40 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all. No events Yes It was okay. No Scam charity What events? See above Yes.

I miss COTA and the
Tour
9/12/2022 12:28:59 A resident of 93921 It was okay. Do not enjoy the throngs of people all over town. No Did not attend Yes Again very crowded They were okay. Too crowded No You have to ask….too
crowded
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 12:30:33 A resident of 93921 It was okay. missed concours on the avenue No did not attend Yes Loved it. They were okay.

Prancing Ponies car
show was great, filled
the void (somewhat)
of the concours on the
ave, but still missed
that event Yes.
tradition, and it also
helps the businesses
in carmel, makes car
week in carmel more
festive, etc.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
i actually think it would be fun if they shut the
streets down on Saturday night and allowed
the fancy cars to come through and "show off"
. Crowds would love to see that and it would
bring people in to watch vs. making it a safety
issue
9/12/2022 12:31:17 A resident of 93921 It was okay. No event on Ocean Ave. this year No Did not attend No Did not attend They were okay. Did not attend any Yes.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/12/2022 12:31:55 A resident of 93921, A worker in 93921 It was okay.

I missed Concours on the Ave. and the Thursday
Tour stop. No Yes It was okay. They were okay.

Concours on the Ave
is a very well executed
event and we missed
it. The Thursday tour
stop is also very
special and we missed
it! Yes.

They are wonderful
events!
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

I appreciate how they closed Ocean at
Junipero in the evening and redirected traffic.

During the daytime, during car week, there
was some dangerous activity. As soon as I
would step out of the crosswalk, cars were
gunning it to get to the next stop sign.

Especially with my 6 year old with me, this felt
very unsafe.
9/12/2022 12:32:27 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Wish the cars on the avenue would return.

Unhappy to hear of those who came to town to
cause problems. Grateful to our amazing police
department doing their best. Yes It was okay. Yes Loved it. Loved them.

Love the variety of
community activities
for such a tiny village. Yes.

It's such a great
opportunity for people
to see amazing cars
without the high cost
of Pebble Beach
events.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat. People still speeding, revving engines, etc.
9/12/2022 12:33:12 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

Great to see fancy cars around the downtown
neighborhood No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? Loved them.

Glad to see all the
activity in the area Yes.

A little personal
inconvenience is
worth it
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat. worked fine
9/12/2022 12:33:46 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

The influx of car enthusiasts brings millions of
dollars to local business and Charity’s Yes I would like to see the concours on the ave brought back Yes Loved it. Brings local community together Brings local
community together Yes.

These free events
allow younger families
to
Learn and see cars
they’d never have the
opportunity too without
spending hundreds at
Pebble
They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.

Created more traffic in surrounds residential
areas. Isn’t a needed expense
9/12/2022 12:36:49 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

It had a different feel. Less wholesome and
more racing type vehicles that were not part of
an official event. Racing up and down our
streets for hours, with little regard for safety of
pedestrians. Seemed like the people following
the Fuel Run were not our usual visitors.

Clogging the sidewalks, drinking and eating on
sidewalks, etc. Yes It was okay. Yes Better than just OK. Didn’t love it, but they did try and thankfully did not make continuous loud speaker announcements all day loke COTA They were okay.

Miss the Thursday
event with the unusual
older historical
vehicles.

Possibly, if they are a
bit smaller and less
noise.

The COTA of the last
few years had gotten
stale. Too many
Porsches. And, too
much partying and
public drinking when
parklets were on the
street in 2021.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

They stopped some of the racing down Ocean
Avenue. But there was not enough control of
the Fuel Run traffic.
9/12/2022 12:36:52 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Too busy, too unmanaged, too loud at night (we
live near Junipero st) No Why? What's the point of that? Yes It was okay. They were okay.

Just not very
interesting
Not until the TRAFFIC
and the

DISRESPECTFUL
VISITORS are better
managed.

You guess ---
miserable experience.

Dirty diapers in our
front yard. Rude
people running stop
signs while I'm
walking the dogs. It's
just the caliber of
person that these
events are now
drawing. It's all about
money, money,
money
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat. Try living a block off of Junipero downtown
9/12/2022 12:37:20 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

I miss Concours on the Avenue and the Tour
d'Elegance on Ocean Avenue, and hope to see
them back someday. No Devendorf Park shouldn't be used for commercial events like this. No It was okay. Loved them. Yes.

I like that the
downtown gets used
in this creative, festive
way.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 12:37:43 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Noise, violations requiring extra police time,
exhaust fumes, goes against efforts to mitigate
climate change. Only good for restaurants and
hotels. Ostentatious puerile displays of wealth. Yes Went as a volunteer in police services to keep dogs out of the park. No Not interested. Unnecessary I enjoy the beauty,
clean air, quietness of
the City. Nothing else
is necessary. No
It’s 2022–way past
due to shut down
global warming
contributors induced
by endless hours of
wasted gas burned on
showing off 20th
century relics.

They helped with traffic and
safety. Communication from CBTS PD.
9/12/2022 12:38:24 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

The event is only one week per year. The village
is alive as people celebrate cars. No It was okay. Yes Loved it. Loved them.

I want to see more
outdoor events. More
outside dining and
seating. Yes.

I want to see more
outdoor events. More
outside dining and
seating.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Did not like the traffic calming. Felt like a
police state. Not friendly. Not inviting.
9/12/2022 12:40:24 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

No events. No Concour On The Avenue, no
Thursday tour, no Aston Martin. Yes It was okay. No I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all.

The Prancing Ponies
should be called the
Prancing Phonies.

Fake charity. They
were supposed to be
denied because it's a
scam. According the
IRS in 2017 they took
in $486,811.00 and
they only paid out
$1,721 in grants. Yes.

Love Car Week, Best
week in the year.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

YouTube influences and out of town people
ruining the party for the rest of us.
9/12/2022 12:41:55 An innkeeper in 93921 It was okay. No Tuesday COTA nor aThursday stop over. No Yes Loved it. Loved them. Yes.

Helps to increase
overnight visitors on
Monday & Tuesday.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 12:42:45 A resident of 93921 Loved it. It was less crowded No What event in the Park?No Not interested They were okay. Yes.

It’s fun - but do just
one big event.

They helped with traffic and
safety. It seems comprehensive
Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/12/2022 12:43:15 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Really missed the drive-thru on Ocean Ave and
the car display on Ocean Ave. Really upset by
the bad behavior of some of the visitors which
required police activity. The police did a great
job. No It was okay. No It was okay. They were okay.

Really missed the
Carmel Mission event. Yes. Really a nice addition.

They helped with traffic and
safety. The traffic flow seemed just fine.
9/12/2022 12:44:09 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all. after living here for 30 years the bloom is off the
rose...as far as car week...i want a quieter
carmel No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? I did not like them at all. i moved here for
peace and the sound
of the ocean...
affordable
restaurants...easy
parking...no litter...
respectful visitors
No
i have lived in large
urban cities...i want a
peaceful village as it
was decades ago...
i mostly stayed home...when i
drove i hated the irresponsible
motorists and pedestrians
i am old.... i can afford to live here...pay my
taxes...buy expensive gas and nice
groceries....i want more bang for my buck in
thinking this is ACTUALLY MY village and it
can bring me serene joy i deserve
9/12/2022 12:45:49 A resident of 93921 Loved it.
very nice event, good people, good for
community No not personally interestedNo Didn't bother me but I personally wasn't interested Loved them. good events, good for
community Yes.

Nice to make them
accessible, great
attraction in town
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 12:46:01 A resident of 93921 It was okay. Missed the cars on Ocean No Yes It was okay. Loved them. Culturally interesting Yes.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 12:47:06 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

We missed the cars on the avenue and the tour
d’elegance in town No What event in the Park?Yes Loved it. They were okay. Yes.

They are well run &
fun
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 12:47:58 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

I love seeing the old classic cars in such perfect
condition and also the not so perfect but still old
cars that their owners like to bring out of storage. Yes It was okay. Yes Loved it. They were okay.

My first year as a
resident and
Concourse on the
Avenue is cancelled -
big disappointment. I
can understand why
and sympathize. Yes.

It is much easier to
walk into town and
see cars on Ocean
Avenue etc and also
to walk to Hwy 1 and
see the cars going to
Big Sur than it is to go
into Pebble Beach.

They helped with traffic and
safety. Because they seemed to help.
9/12/2022 12:48:14 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

Loved the energy. Even though it added
additional traffic, the many cars on the road and
parked around the village, created a sense of
inclusion through proximity. You didn't need to
purchase a ticket to drive alongside or
see/photograph many of the unique cars, just
being out/about in the village was fun. No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? Did not attend Yes.

Great energy and fun
to be amongst!
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 12:48:17 A worker in 93921 Loved it.

Smaller events, east to navigate around the City.

Events didn't overwhelm the City. Still lots of
nice cars parked everywhere. Yes Loved it. Yes Loved it. Loved them.

Again, they were small
and didn't overwhelm
the City. Both events
were put together
nicely, the Prancing
Ponies on Ocean
Avenue was the
perfect size, they
could of had more
cars if they wanted. Yes.

The events are
different, one is an all
day event (similar to
the Prancing Ponies)
and the other is just a
drive through, but the
cars are beautiful!!!
Both bring different
elements to the City.

The streets should be reopened, the parts that
were shut down seemed dead and closed up.

I think the business owners in these areas
suffered. Maybe look at different styles of
traffic patterns - switching the left and right
lane on each intersection or mid-block -
maybe?
9/12/2022 12:50:13 Loved it. Great for the economy of Monterey County No No Loved them.

Great for the economy
of Monterey County. Yes.

Great for the economy
of Monterey county
9/12/2022 12:52:56 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all. There was no Concours event No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? Lacks a sense of community The general feeling is
that Carmel is shoddy,
overrun by tourists,
and no one cares
anymore Yes.

These are epic
events! Especially
Tour d'Elegance It may have deterred racing.

There are a lot of Larry Lambos in town that
week. We can hear them.
9/12/2022 12:55:34 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Cool to see all the cars but crowded and people
were drag racing down ocean. No Yes Loved it. They were okay. Yes.

Would like to see
Carmel event return
but need to enforce
things like speeding.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat. There was drag racing down ocean
9/12/2022 12:55:39 A worker in 93921 Loved it.

An exceptional event for the Monterey
Peninsula. No No Yes.

A free opportunity for
locals to participate in
Car Week.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat. Best that PD could do
9/12/2022 12:57:06 A worker in 93921 It was okay. I miss the bigger events from previous years. No I did not attend. No I did not attend. They were okay.

The energy in the city
is exciting but the lack
of the big events
made me not as
excited about the
events as I was in
previous years. Yes. No opinion. Did not affect me. No opinion. Did not affect me. 9/12/2022 12:57:29 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all. Rudeness of tourists and excessive noise No No If it benefits the town, I
don’t mind
They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.

I’ve never seen the level of openly and
arrogantly flouting traffic rules and speed limits
as this year.
9/12/2022 12:58:03 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Aggressive drivers made me unsafe in walking
downtown. I wasn't certain if they would observe
stop signs -- some didn't. And the constant
noise from loud mufflers, day and night. No Did not attend. No Walked through it, so have no feelings about it. They were okay.

Some businesses
make lots of money
and tax revenues
accrue to us. That is
OK Yes.

Classier crowd and
more revenue. It may
be good for the city,
but I just stay home
and avoid the mobs
They helped with traffic and
safety.

Anything is better than leaving it unchanged
and wide open for mischief.
9/12/2022 12:58:50 A resident of 93921, A retail shop owner in 93921 I did not like it at all. Bad for my business. No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? I like the events that are for the residence , like the Carmel Holloween parade. Like we were a home town. No 9/12/2022 12:59:13 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Really miss the Carmel Ocean Avenue car
event. I think it provided a nice opportunity for
residents and non residents a no cost oevent to
get into the spirit of car week. Yes It was okay. Yes Loved it. They were okay.

Same as previous
answer. Yes. Same overall answer
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/12/2022 13:04:43 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Loved the Prancing Ponies two-block show;
missed having the bigger Concourse on Ocean;
Loved the hard work of CPD trying to keep the
racing cars and shenanigans and everyone
safe; Hated hearing about the threatening gang
of bad actors disrupting people's safety and
comfort! No Yes Loved it. They were okay.

See answer to Q2 on
earlier page Yes.

Enjoy the cars, energy
and fun atmosphere ...
but also so very much
appreciate how CPD
works hard to control
troublemakers
disrupting things both
on wheels and on foot.

If it becomes to
daunting to control
them and keep people
happy & safe, I would
rather not have the
event(s).

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

It definitely helps on Ocean but, unfortunately,
there are troublemakers and other drivers who
simply go to other streets and speed up well
over safe speeds. We live on Dolores and a
safe walk to town during Car Week is definitely
much tougher.
9/12/2022 13:05:07 A resident of 93921 Loved it. Wonderful celebration of kinetic art No Yes Loved it. Loved them. Brings life to the town Yes.

Unique opportunity for
residents and visitors
to witness truly world
class events
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/12/2022 13:07:06 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Horribly loud, terribly crowded and misbehaving
visitors Yes I did not like it at all. No What event on Ocean Avenue? I did not like them at all. No Horrible They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.
9/12/2022 13:08:23 A worker in 93921 It was okay. I missed the concourse event on Ocean No No Yes.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 13:08:40 A worker in 93921 It was okay.

The impacts to traffic were not too bad. The
event brought in alot of visitors and revenue,
which is positive. The Prancing Ponies event
was great! No Yes Loved it. They were okay. Yes.

Revenue and visitors
to Carmel are a
positive way to bring
people to experience
the area. It would be
great to have other
events that focus on
the environment and
sustainability, such as
electric
cars/alternative
energy
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/12/2022 13:11:50 A resident of 93921 It was okay.
cars on ocean av cancelled this year hope back
next year really missed No What event in the Park?No was not aware of it I did not like them at all. cars in park too short
no cars on ocean
avenue this year too
many rowdy outsiders
on fri and sat night
absolutely return
these two events
they were missed and
they bring the local
community together
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
too many outside visitors wanting to drive fast
good that we had extra police in town
9/12/2022 13:13:25 A resident of 93921 It was okay. We really missed Concours on the Avenue Yes It was okay. Yes Loved it. They were okay. Yes.

The free events are
really important for
locals who don’t have
the means to attend
Pebble Beach or
Auction events.

Not having races at
Laguna Seca on
Sunday was a strange
choice that probably
had nothing to do with
the city but does make
the week less
desirable.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 13:16:55 A resident of 93921 It was okay. I don't care about cars. No I don't care No I don't care They were okay.

This is not an area of
interest for me No
I don't care about cars
or the people who do
I stayed home to avoid all the
traffic
9/12/2022 13:19:26 A resident of 93921, A retail shop owner in 93921 I did not like it at all.

My local clients don't want to come to town and
car week doesn't generally bring me too much
tourist clients. Perhaps sales are better for
jewelry stores? It is really the worst week for me
and many of us (business owners) have said that
next year may be one where we are closed for
the week. It's not worth the time coming in. No No I did not like them at all.

It's so rough on my
business. No Same as above
They helped with traffic and
safety.

Blocking the streets was great for preventing
the usual revving and speeding that happens.
9/12/2022 13:20:02 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Good attendance and great for local businesses
after Covid losses, but too many people.

Attendance should be limited (tickets?) so village
can handle crowds safely. Disruptions by out of
towners who came to make noise and be a
nuisance was not at all welcome. Concern for
residents who need services or help when all
resources were directed to events. No No
Good attendance and
great for local
businesses after
Covid losses, but too
many people.

Attendance should be
limited (tickets?) so
village can handle
crowds safely.

Disruptions by out of
towners who came to
make noise and be a
nuisance was not at
all welcome. Concern
for residents who
need services or help
when all resources
were directed to
events. No
Good attendance and
great for local
businesses after
Covid losses, but too
many people.

Attendance should be
limited (tickets?) so
village can handle
crowds safely.

Disruptions by out of
towners who came to
make noise and be a
nuisance was not at
all welcome. Concern
for residents who
need services or help
when all resources
were directed to
events.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Good attendance and great for local
businesses after Covid losses, but too many
people. Attendance should be limited
(tickets?) so village can handle crowds safely.

Disruptions by out of towners who came to
make noise and be a nuisance was not at all
welcome. Concern for residents who need
services or help when all resources were
directed to events.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/12/2022 13:20:43 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Not enough enforcement & too much bad
behavior No What event in the Park?No Not sure why we do this on Ocean ave. Used to be off the main street ... They were okay.

As residents, it all
seems a bit out of
control. Loud,
speeding cars, crowds
of unruly people, rules
of the beach not
followed.

Yes, with good
enforcement.

We need more safety
in place for residents. Need mor
We stayed away from downtown so not sure
what was/wasn't effective. Based on what we
heard about certain behavior, we think we
need more proactive enforcement
9/12/2022 13:26:44 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

Car week brings lots of visitors and their families.

The events provide fun things to do and the local
businesses benefit. Yes, it's crowded and there's
lots of traffic, but for one summer week, the area
is all about automobiles. It's wonderful! I would
really like to see the COTA come back and
would be willing to volunteer to help with that
effort. No I had to work... Yes Loved it. Loved them.

It's a week about
CARS. Love them or
plan your trip out of
town next year. I think
it's the best week of
the year and want to
see Carmel reinstate
COTA and the lunch
hour of the Tour. Yes.

That's what it's all
about. If you don't like
it, leave town for the
week.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

I think the traffic management was handled
thoughtfully and that it made a real difference.
9/12/2022 13:30:01 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

It brings interesting people, autos and much
needed revenue to our town and to area
charities. No No Loved them.

The events showcase
our community and
bring people together. Yes.

It was sorely missed
this year and I believe
the more events the
better for reasons
stated prior.

They helped with traffic and
safety. Pretty easy to get around all week.
9/12/2022 13:31:11 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

I find part of the fun of Car Week is getting to
stroll to downtown and see the cars/chat with the
owners and enthusiasts, which wasn't an option
this year as we didn't have the Concours on the
Avenue. No I didn't attend. No n/a Missed Concours.

It's an event that fits
my level of
participation in Car
Week. Yes.

Car Week isn't going
away. It will continue
to be in the
surrounding areas,
and we will continue to
hear the noise from
the cars coming
through town or on
Hwy 1 into the
evening even if
Carmel doesn't
participate. It's nice to
enjoy some of the
activities of Car Week
without having to pay
a large amount for
tickets or drive to
another town/search
for parking, etc.

Concours on the
Avenue was a great
way to see a lot of the
cars, feel like the town
was bustling with
enthusiasts as
opposed to feeling as
if our town had been
overtaken by those
attending Car Week.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

The 5-way stop at the bottom of Ocean is
often a nightmare crossing without an event
happening. I thought the redirection of traffic
helped tremendously in that area.
9/12/2022 13:33:47 A worker in 93921 I did not like it at all. Too noisy, too much traffic, crime, and chaos. No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? They were okay. No Streets around this
area are not
constructed for large
events like this. This is
a quaint area with a
classical, whimsical
ambience and the
events should be
fitting of this.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/12/2022 13:38:58 A worker in 93921 Loved it.

It's my first time being here in Carmel during the
week. I loved seeing all the cars. Yes It was okay. No I wasn't here. Loved them. not sure, as I have not
experienced them. do not have an opinion.
9/12/2022 13:44:43 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

It’s all too much. Hear racing engines at night
feels unsafe for the community No Too many events No Didn’t go Not interested Car week is now ten
days or more. It’s too
much and has
wrecked the thing
. 85000 visitors and
we have no water??
Those events are
more traditional and
the one supports
carmel foundation
See above. Your is
directly related to the
main event
Not sure . Avoided town at night.

It’s t sounded dangerous snd
friends told me it felt that way
Why do people think it’s ok to come to our
town and race ???!!!
9/12/2022 13:53:39 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Noise, visitors looking to park in the driveways,
facing wrong way, cars go throuth the stops
without stopping (Monte Verde & Ocean-needs a
cop present at all times). No I did not like it at all. I did not like it at all. They were okay. No Not enough cops to
keep things under
control
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Alternative routes around Ocean Ave would
clog up narrow streets
9/12/2022 13:59:35 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

We live close to one of the main entrances/exits
into town. The loud revving of car engines went
on well after we had gone to bed most nights of
car week. We were woken from sleep four and
five times a night. We are also frequent
pedestrians and it became quite dangerous at
times with speeding cars and little regard for stop
signs. For the first time ever I was frequently
thinking “where are the cops“. No No Did not attend
I wish that there had been more
comprehensive safety throughout
the city, not just centered on
downtown. I live about six blocks
from town and I felt that my
neighborhood was turned into a
race track. The noise and the
speeding cars made walking into
town very unpleasant
Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/12/2022 13:59:43 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Hard to move around our own city. Loud racing
engines at all hours of the night. Streets littered
by people who do not respect our city. No No I did not like them at all. No People park
haphazardly all over
the neighborhoods,
where parking is
already at a premium.

A friend had her
driveway blocked and
the police refused to
have the rental car
towed. Squealing
tires, revving engines,
and cars racing
between stop signs. I
watched several cares
blow through stop
signs like they weren't
even there. It
becomes very
dangerous for
pedestrians in the
neighborhoods.

Only helped moderately in the
downtown.
9/12/2022 14:01:28 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

We live far enough from the center that the
inconvenience doesn’t reach us No Not in town that day No It was okay. They were okay.

Don’t go near the
center at that time
This year seemed to
have less crush
Celebrating such
inequality kind of
doesn’t mesh with our
values
They helped with traffic and
safety. We didn’t seem to notice any problems
9/12/2022 14:02:08 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

I liked seeing the visitors in town, I liked seeing
the cars No Yes Loved it. Loved them. Yes.

It is a really fun
experience
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 14:09:47 A resident of 93921 Loved it. Vibrancy…lots of people and fun No No They were okay. Yes. Good for the town They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 14:18:28 A resident of 93921, A worker in 93921 I did not like it at all.

Too crowded, too noisy. Not really what the
village is about imho No It was okay. No It was okay. Love farmers' market as above No as above it was scary here. first time in 20 +
years I've felt that way. Scary!
9/12/2022 14:19:17 A worker in 93921 It was okay. It was very crowded No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? Not a huge fan of car week Yes.

I like the more
traditional
They helped with traffic and
safety. I heard it was crazy!
9/12/2022 14:19:43 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

I was disappointed that Concourse on the
Avenue did not take place. No Yes Loved it. They were okay. Yes.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

Police were organized and ready for
inappropriate activity.
9/12/2022 14:20:32 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Every year it just seems like we have more "bad
actors" in town. These are not classic car
enthusiasts, but just people - typically young
men - with loud cars that they like to drive fast,
seemingly enjoying the annoyance they create. It
has become a loud and unsafe weekend and I'd
be delighted if it just went away. Yes It was okay. Yes It was okay. They were okay.

The sponsored events
are fine, but having
them CBTS just
encourages the bad
actors to also attend. No
I think I've said it - the
overall tone of car
week is inconsistent
with the tone of CBTS.

It is a "look at me"
crowd, showing off
their stuff. Boys with
toys. CBTS is
delightfully not about
showmanship. End
this please.

They helped, but only by keeping
an intolerable situation from
becoming worse.

As long as CBTS supports any events at car
week, it will continue to be identified as the
place to come and annoy the locals. Shutting
down streets is just a game of whackamole,
sending the nuckleheads into the residential
streets. How about a big sign at Ocean and
Hwy 1 saying that there are no car week
events in CBTS, and to please enjoy those in
Carmel Valley and Monterey and elsewhere!
9/12/2022 14:23:57 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

City already has 40% 2cd/3rd and investment
homes -- all unoccupied. Character is lost as a
wealth enclave, some would say wealth ghetto No I did not like it at all. No I did not like it at all. They were okay.

Some diversity to
events No
City less a "real town"
and more an Event
Center for wealthy and
wealthy wannabes
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Drag racing on Ocean Ave, racing/speeding
throughout the peninsula
9/12/2022 14:26:19 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

In this age of climate change, it is irresponsible
to be celebrating the internal combustion engine. No No I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all.See above. No See above.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/12/2022 14:29:28 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Missed COTA and Pebble Tour cars coming
through. Felt like every other city had things
going on except us. No It was okay. No I did not like it at all. There weren't any There was nothing Yes.

They are classy and at
no charge and show
off our village in a
good way. It's art in
the street.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 14:31:31 A resident of 93921 Loved it. Liked all the cars No Too much advertising No Didn’t attend Loved them.

Like the Concors on
the Avenueq
They were good but probably
need more.

Didn’t like the crowd that gathered in the
evening
Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/12/2022 14:34:50 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

I hate what the crowds do to our town, and the
drivers go racing through the neighborhoods at a
really unsafe speed. No I did not like it at all. No I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all.

I understood the
appeal of the
Concours on the
Avenue, since it
offered people a
chance to look at the
cars without paying a
steep price for a ticket,
and of course I was
pleased that the
Carmel Foundation
benefited from the
event. But that event
is gone, and we don't
need other Car Week
events in town. It
doesn't seem
consistent with the
culture of Carmel, and
I do hate it that we're
celebrating the
internal combustion
engine at a time like
this, when climate
change is such a
looming crisis.

I'd be grudgingly okay
with the Concours on
the Avenue, but that's
it.

They didn't work well enough...it
was better than 2019, but still a
problem.
9/12/2022 14:35:05 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Need to do something about cars racing on San
Carlos. Not safe and very loud. Happens up to
almost midnight. Trash from sunset center to
pur frontyards to 11th Avenue. Drunk high
school kids at the bus stop on San Carlos and
11th from 1:00 p.m. until midnight. RV's parked
in front of our houses with generators going,
dogs barking and loud music. No No Working so did not attend any events. Yes.

Great boost for our
village shops and is a
wonderful time for
locals.

Did not seem to stop racing and
loud cars in residential area on
San Carlos. Blocking Ocean was
s good move.

It seems like what was done wS for the
commercial district and not much for residents
on San Carlos and other high traffic streets
like Junipero.
9/12/2022 14:50:22 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Minimal exposure but likes that Prancing Ponies
was on Ocean Avenue No Yes Loved it. They were okay. Yes.

More excitement and
brings in outside
participants and
tourists
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 14:59:39 A resident of 93921, A retail shop owner in 93921 It was okay.

No COTA, no Pebble Beach Tours d'Elegance
on Ocean Yes Yes I did not like it at all. Kind of pathetic versus previous years. Essentially no quality events. See above. Yes.

We need it for the
City's economy and I
like beautiful cars.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

Think how bad it would have gotten without
them.
9/12/2022 15:17:47 A resident of 93921 It was okay. Yes Loved it. Yes Loved it. Loved them. Yes. 9/12/2022 15:43:51 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

Love seeing all the cars and excitement in the
town No Yes Loved it. Loved them. Yes.

I think its good for the
town
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 15:50:29 A resident of 93921, A retail shop owner in 93921 It was okay.

I would like to see Concourse on the Avenue
return (I understand why it did not happen this
year) and the road rally on Thursday stop in town
again. These are the type of events that Carmel
should embrace and work to keep. They bring a
lot of people into town—which is good for
everyone. Yes, parking is difficult but so what, it’
s a couple of days. Unfortunately, the “events”
that did take place—evening drive arounds—we’
re not the type we want in town. No No Didn’t attend but glad they were part of car week They were okay. Yes.

Great events that
reflect the Carmel.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/12/2022 15:51:19 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Sad that the concours on Ocean Ave did not
take place Yes It was okay. Yes It was okay. They were okay.

Again missed the
concours on the
avenue Yes.

The events are fun
and interesting
They helped with traffic and
safety. The Carmel PD did a great job
9/12/2022 15:54:05 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all. (1) Loud, intoxicated people on the sidewalk, (2)
people disrespectful to and threatening police
officers, (3) reckless, speeding unsafe driving,
(4) loud cars and motorcycles with mufflers ALL
night long and (5) no place for families and the
elderly. Why did we install cameras around town
that don't monitor and ticket excessively loud
vehicles? Don't we care about our reputation?
Every year this gets worse!!! Why do we tolerate
this behavior? Where is the benefit here? I know
many residents who leave town for car week. No I did not like it at all. No I did not like it at all. All of them are fine EXCEPT Car Week!!! This is not way to live! The Tour d'Elegance
was fine. It was free
and open to everyone.

It least we got some
benefit for all the
trouble.

Why don't we
celebrate something
environmentally
responsible, like an
electronic vehicle
show. How about an
event that features
new EVs and people
that have converted
their gas cars to EVs?
There are many
wonderful and
charming EV
conversions. The
people doing the
conversions are
wonderful and
charming too. And
they can educate the
kids! Something that
is positive and not
fueled by petrol and
alcohol.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/12/2022 16:13:38 A resident of 93921 It was okay. It didn’t really make a difference to my activities. No What event in the Park?Yes Loved it. They were okay.

We missed the Ocean
Avenue event. Yes.

Ocean Avenue is a
great venue
They helped with traffic and
safety.

Controlling the speed up and down ocean Ave
is essential
Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/12/2022 16:24:50 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Too many visitors overwhelm the village and the
municipal resources. Attracting an undesirable
element as seen on Friday night this year and
akin to the problems of several years ago. No No too many! The City is catering to
the visitor element and
not the residential
community. The
downtown public
assets looks shabby,
unkempt, in need of
maintenance and
repair/replacement.

But the focus is on
events to attract outof-towners. NoSame answers as
above
If we didn't have the events, we
wouldn't need the traffic efforts. Same as previously listed. 9/12/2022 16:31:00
9/12/2022 16:31:50 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Carmel should host the Tuesday and Thursday
events like before. The amount of people and
traffic is the same whether the main events are
outside of Carmel or in Carmel, so why not host
some of the events that Carmel is known for. No What event in the Park?No Just not the amazing Carmel car event that I'm used to. Not impressed.

By comparison to
previous car show
years in Carmel, this
was not worth
attending or inviting
friends to come. Yes.

Spectacular cars and
it's free for everyone
to enjoy on Carmel's
amazing stage (it's
streetscape of historic
buildings), and Carmel
is famous for these
events. I don't like the
traffic issues or
sideshows, but we
seemed to have those
issues without hosting.

They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.

Still too many people and too many cars. As a
resident, I usually leave town to avoid the
traffic and crowds.
9/12/2022 16:41:57 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

Car week is a globally recognized series of
events that bring patrons and participants to the
Peninsula from all over the world. this global
exposure is priceless and should be celebrated
by everyone interested in seeing carmel thrive. Yes Loved it. Yes Loved it. Loved them.

Carmel should
encourage events and
community
celebrations to
enhance and reinforce
our active culture. Yes.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

I don’t think closing ocean avenue is the right
decision. Instead just place sufficient
temporary speed humps to modulate flow.
9/12/2022 16:48:39 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Fewer cars as previous years. Loud recorded
music not useful. Yes I did not like it at all. Yes It was okay. Loved them. I love local events Yes. It enhances the town They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Speeding on 4th as usual to/from Pebble
Beach
9/12/2022 17:50:06 A resident of 93921 It was okay. Missed the Concours on the Avenue No What event in the Park?No missed it unfortunately Missed the usual Thursday car meet at Devendorf Park Yes.

Love the cars and it
brings in high end
tourists and makes
money for the town
and charities
They helped with traffic and
safety.

Didn't notice any disruptions except for loud
engine noises at night
9/12/2022 17:56:30 I did not like it at all.

The attendees do not respect Carmel, our town,
the plants and it provides an opportunity for
mayhem by those bent on causing trouble. It
causes traffic disruption, closure of schools,
prevents people who work in and around Carmel
to cancel their jobs. No I drove by it to see how many cars were parked on the park. No Did not go. They were okay.

The cultural events
befit Carmel. No
The Concours on the
Avenue just go too
big. The 10 days of
events become
headaches for
residents, other than
those who like cars.

The Tour with a stop
in Carmel would be
welcome.

Because I avoid downtown during Car Week, I
cannot speak to this issue. It was very
crowded when I did drive through.
9/12/2022 17:59:35 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

Loved the excitement and seeing all the exotic,
beautiful, and sporty cars on the roads or parked
in town. No It was okay. Yes Loved it. They were okay.

Miss the Concours on
the Avenue on
Tuesday's and vintage
cars lined up on
Ocean on Thursday’s. Yes.

They were the
highlights of Car Week
for my husband and
me in past years. As
residents, we loved
being able to walk
freely to the events,
mingle with people,
and spend time taking
photos.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

As a pedestrian, I felt it was more dangerous
to divert traffic to side streets which were
narrow and caused congestion, resulted in
impatient and erratic drivers, made parked
cars were more likely to be sideswiped, and
created more risks for pedestrians crossing
streets.
9/12/2022 18:04:32 A resident of 93921 It was okay. No No I did not like it at all. Missed cars in Carmel Fun gathering with
locals Yes. Local involvement
They helped with traffic and
safety. Kept traffic moving
9/12/2022 18:05:14 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

It used to be called « le concours d’élégance ».

Now it is more like noise, drag racing and total
disrespect for our precious little town. I live on
Carpenter and we take our very lives in our
hands trying to back out of our driveways. The
noise and danger of the speeding on my street is
absolutely unacceptable and very dangerous. No No Yes.

Because that is what
the Concours is about
9/12/2022 18:37:31 A restauranteur in 93921It was okay. Not enough foot traffic Yes It was okay. No What event on Ocean Avenue? They were okay.

Big events are all
gone Yes. More people in town
They helped with traffic and
safety. Need to enforce
9/12/2022 18:59:01 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all. Crowds at night too large, lawlessness, etc. No What event in the Park?Yes I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all. these events are
attracting an outside
element that is
reckless, dangerous No too disruptive
They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.
there were incidents of crime, out of control
behavior
9/12/2022 19:32:40 A resident of 93921 It was okay. Missed the daytime events that usually occur. No Yes It was okay. They were okay.

Missed the drive
through parade and
the other daytime
event
Hope they are back
next year Yes.

More enjoyable than
the nighttime antics
They helped with traffic and
safety.

Pedestrian management has gotten
challenging, we even saw a flasher this year.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/12/2022 20:36:54 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Too much of a sideshow feel on Ocean Ave
Friday and Saturday nights. It was a younger
crowd that appeared to be interested in loitering
and side show type events. Didn't feel like the
typical car week audience. Yes It was okay. Yes Loved it. They were okay. we missed attending
concourse on the ave.

Acura event was fairly
low key and
uneventful Yes.
these are traditional
car week events that
bring true car
enthusiasts to the city
and people who will
also patronize the
restaurants and
retailers
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
overall too many people downtown on Friday
and Saturday and a questionable crowd
9/12/2022 20:37:56 A worker in 93921 Loved it.

It was exciting to see the joy and enthusiasm of
the car lovers. Patience was important to handle
the large number of visitors Yes Loved it. Yes Loved it. Loved them.

Again, the enthusiasm
and joy of all
participants was worth
the challenges of the
crowds Yes.

So many people
asked "When is the
Concours on the
Avenue?" It was truly
missed by many
people
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/12/2022 20:59:42 A resident of 93921 Loved it. Need to bring back COTA Yes Loved it. Yes Had mixed feelings about the fashion show aspect. Loved them.

Enjoyed people from
all over the world
coming together for an
innovative event in a
beautiful location. Yes.

Making the beautiful
cars available to all to
appreciate is essential
to Car Week. And the
draw for local
businesses is huge.

Missed that this year
quite a lot.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

There are some who are detrimental to this
elegant history.
9/12/2022 23:02:04 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

I hate cars and car noise. So I stay away from
downtown, and it then does not bother me too
much, except for the occasional roar of an
unmuffled roar No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? I did not like them at all.

Hate cars and
attendant hoopla No
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/12/2022 23:45:11 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

We really missed COTA and even much more
missed Tour D’Elegance stopping in town on
Thursday.

Prancing ponies was ok (better than nothing ).

The exotic cars around town were amazing
(jewelry on wheels) . No Like going Tovar dealerships Yes It was okay. They were okay. Already answered this Yes.

Getting up close for
free to the 1950 and
prior year cars is what
is the real Village
experience for Car
Week. Love love love
that the best!
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat. Still too much speeding in San Carlos Ave.
9/13/2022 0:10:44 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

For me, car week is all about the Thursday tour
on Ocean Ave we previously have enjoyed. I
had volunteered from 2016 to 2019 for this
event, until the pandemic shut it down. It is such
a great opportunity for residents and visitors to
see the classics up close and interact with the
owners ….. all for free. Please work on bringing
that back as an event!! Yes I did not like it at all. Yes It was okay. I did not like them at all.

Nothing can replace
the COTA event on
Tuesday and the
Thursday Tour d’
Elegance on Ocean. I
realize the issues with
the Tuesday event
and am sympathetic.

Please work to bring
them back. The Acura
and Prancing Ponies
were unimpressive
substitutes. Yes.

They are stellar
events and contribute
to the Carmel
Foundation. The Tour
d’Elegance is an
opportunity to
volunteer and
provides residents and
visitors an opportunity
to see these amazing
cars that will be
judged up close for
free. The COTY event
highlights more of the
exotic cars which are
exciting, as well.

These two events are
what makes car week
special for me!
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Ocean Ave was way too crowded with hyper
cars and people.
9/13/2022 6:22:10 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Too many loud cars, totally out of control. City
streets should not be blocked with car shows
and the resulting no parking for traffic control.

Too big for our small business district. Yes I did not like it at all. Yes I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all.

The cars shown were
not worthy of the
resulting disruption. No
These events are too
large and disruptive. It
is questionable as to
the revenue brought in
compared to the
overall cost to the city
to monitor and
maintain them.

They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.

Obstacles seem to annoy the speeders,
sometimes resulting in more reckless driving.

There should be more police presence and
violations given.
9/13/2022 7:22:18 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

I think it’s nice to have a classy event with
beautiful cars and owners who love sharing
them. I liked the prancing pony show a bit more
than the previous event. The events bring life as
well as money for our local businesses. No Yes Loved it. Loved them.

Same answer as
above. Yes. Same answer
They helped with traffic and
safety.

From what I observed in the evenings it
seemed a bit calmer than previous years
although I know we had some issues with bad
behavior.
9/13/2022 7:31:03 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Completely missed having concour on the
Avenue. We have car event guru’s here who
could’ve stepped in and picked up the event for
the previous operator and then have given it
back to her should she choose. An event
conservator per say. Yes Loved it. Yes Loved it. They were okay.

Needed concours on
the ave Yes.

That event elevates
our area and allows us
to show off to a world
crowd.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/13/2022 9:26:06 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all. Bad elements in town. No I DIDN'T ATTEND No I DIDN'T ATTEND I think that there's an unruly element that comes to town and we need to deal with that.

I think that there's an
unruly element that
comes to town and we
need to deal with that. No Too much unruliness
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/13/2022 9:37:57 A resident of 93921 It was okay. No Cars in the Avenue No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? They were okay. Yes. More events, more fun They helped with traffic and
safety.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/13/2022 10:15:22 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

The noise is deafening. We live close to 17 mile
drive and we may as well live next to Laguna
Seca. I never heard police sirens chasing down
those racers. How about imposing an RPM limit?
What about violations of noise limits. I was in a
cross walk and had an antique car honk at me to
get out of the way as he sped past! The lack of
Concours on the Ave spoiled car week for
Carmel-By-The-Sea Residents! No What event in the Park?Yes It was okay. I only saw one Yes.

They are the only
events that make car
week tolerable for
residents.

I didn’t witness any positive
effects
9/13/2022 10:20:15 A worker in 93921 Loved it.

It brings energy and excitement to the village.

And lots of eye candy (the cars, of course)! No What event in the Park?Yes Loved it. Loved them.

The vibe is so
positive. Yes.

More energy,
excitement, and good
vibes for the village.

Plus it's an economic
boost to our local
economy.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

People who break the rules will always find a
way. Carmel PD did an excellent job
managing those who got out of hand.
9/13/2022 10:31:03 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

Because the Auto Racing Industry made me
what I am today. I love Cars! No Didn't attend this event.Yes Loved it. Loved them.

Events generate
revenue for Carmel
plus I love people. Yes.

We all need to get out
of the house, have fun
and meet new people!
They helped with traffic and
safety.

Because it helped isolate the flow of event
traffic.
9/13/2022 11:48:40 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

I missed the Concourse de Avenue and would
love to see it return. Also, there was a different
crowd on the Avenue this year. Many younger
adults who seemed to be more interested in
loitering and side shows than automobiles. It felt
like a more “combustible” crowd which made it
less pleasant for me. Yes It was okay. Yes Loved it. They were okay. See prior response Yes.

Very enjoyable and
good for Carmel
merchants
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/13/2022 12:13:41 A worker in 93921, A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay. TRAFFIC NOISE Yes It was okay. Yes It was okay. Loved them.

CARMEL IS #1 MOST
BEAUTIFUL CITY Yes. REVENUE
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/13/2022 12:43:51 A resident of 93921 It was okay. It didn't interfere with my life. No What event in the Park?Yes It was okay. They were okay.

I miss the usual big
events. Yes.

They are a bigger
draw and more
exciting.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat. I could get around better
9/13/2022 13:26:03 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

I used to like it, many, many years ago. Like
Carmel by the Sea, it now attracts way too many
visitors. Those visitors cost tax dollars (police,
administration, maintenance, clean-up, etc). I
don't benefit in any way and am mostly
inconvenienced. Businesses make money,
homeowners who can rent their homes for
outrageous sums due to demand, make money.

Residents like me foot the bills for no benefit
other than the eye candy of the cars. For the 20
years we have lived here, we've seen our city go
from a nice quiet little beach community to a
profit driven, over advertised, over visited, over
priced, Business, whose goal is to make money
for business. The quality of life to residents like
me has gone down tremendously while the
budget to maintain this business centric model
has become obscene. No What event in the Park?No I did not like it at all.

Too crowded, no
parking, I avoid town
other than very early
in the day. No
If it gets larger than it
was this year I'll leave
town like many other
residents do.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Traffic control of events has very much
improved over the years. How much did this
traffic and safety cost exactly?
9/13/2022 14:10:39 A worker in 93921 It was okay.

Loved the cars, hate the traffic but once a year,
the pro's outweigh the con's. Yes Loved it. Yes Loved it. Loved them.

Would like more car
events Yes. Love the cars
Needs improvement like shut
down Ocean St completely and
sell or allocate parking spots for
show cars only.s Love old cars
9/13/2022 14:42:01 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Missed having the car show on Ocean Avenue
this year and felt that Carmel was not as active
in Car Week as it has been in the past. So we
left town for a few days.

No We were not in town on the 16th. No Have seen Prancing Ponies in previous years. Would like to see Carmel have a major event during Car Week like we've had in the past.

Prefer having Carmel
be a major player
during Car Week with
top notch events. Yes.

We have always
enjoyed those events. We were out of town. See above.
9/13/2022 15:04:05 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

I enjoyed the Prancing Ponies show, and seeing
all the fancy sporty cars parked around town
during the 10 days of car week. No Missed it but would have liked to attend Yes Loved it. Missed having the cars on the avenue show and the cars from the tour of the peninsula stopping in town for lunch.

We have enjoyed both
events in the past and
missed them this year.

It is a great
opportunity to see the
cars close up without
having to leave town
and face traffic! Yes.

I think they are great
events that draw a lot
of people to town -
enjoyed by both locals
and tourists, and great
for our local
businesses.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

I walked downtown a few nights and the later it
got there was a feeling things could get out of
control pretty easily (I worked in law
enforcement before I retired)
9/13/2022 15:20:18 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

It wasn't too overly crowded this time. We didn't
have to wait long for dinner anywhere either. The
police did really well on the traffic flow. No Missed it this year Yes Loved it. Loved them. Always a good time Yes.

I love more events in
the area
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/13/2022 15:35:20 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 I did not like it at all.

There continues to be a reduction of car week
events each year. It is disappointing given the
events I’ve attended numerous times in years’
past. No What event in the Park?No Did not attend as I wasn’t interested. I did not like them at all.

Lack of shows that
were staples in
previous years Yes.

Concours on the
Avenue and the tour
stop were the two
events I would attend
every year in Carmel.

They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.

It did not calm traffic by shutting streets down
and it is an insulting measure taken for one
week a year by a community that loves to reap
the rewards of car week but doesn’t want to
partake in it.
9/13/2022 15:35:48 A resident of 93921 It was okay.
traffic and stunt car racing in Carmel was
unacceptble Yes I did not like it at all. Yes not a good role model for young girls - fashion show and emphasis on fast cars nothing special nothing of interest for meone or the other but
not both
traffic and safety
concerns
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
helped with traffic but safety issues were still a
big concern
9/13/2022 15:55:29 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

Really not the same without Concours on the
Avenue… hopefully the event will return. No No Yes.

They are signature
events that bring out
the absolute best cars
for the viewing public
to enjoy without an
admission ticket.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/13/2022 16:38:45 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 I did not like it at all.

Miss the tour d’elegance stopping in downtown
Carmel. This used to be a highlight of all of car
week
The revving/cruising in the evening needs to be
stopped somehow No No I did not like them at all. Yes.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/13/2022 16:42:37 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

Car Week is awesome. And really my only
reason for visiting Carmel. No No Yes. Seemed unnecessary.

Some of the traffic measures seemed overthe-top. There were a lot of people out wanting to see the cars on weekend. But I didn’t see
any dangerous driving so shutting the streets
down felt like an overcorrection.
9/13/2022 17:11:56 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it. No What event in the Park?No Loved them. Yes.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/13/2022 17:20:08 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 I did not like it at all.

Please bring back cars on Ocean Ave. fashion
show was boring and not fun. Yes It was okay. Yes I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all. Yes. Be great! They helped with traffic and
safety.

Too strict. Roads were closed and quite
difficult to get around.
9/13/2022 18:09:56 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it. Friends, Food, cars, amazing No What event in the Park?No It was okay. They were okay.

I miss Concours on
the Ave held on
Tuesday to kick off
carweek Yes. Tradition
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/13/2022 18:18:49 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 I did not like it at all.

The events I normally go to were canceled this
year. It was really just a place to see people and
cars going by. I ended up not spending any
money in Carmel which is unusual. No What event in the Park?No I had another event at the same time so I missed it this year. They were okay. Yes.

These are the reasons
I come to Carmel
during Car Week.

They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.

This just pushed traffic to the side streets that
are narrower so they ended up being blocked
and caused more traffic.
9/13/2022 18:39:54 A worker in 93921, A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay. Just not the same without Concours on the Ave No What event in the Park?No Poor substitute for COAThey were okay. No COA Yes.

I own the Junipero
Professional Building
(4th & Junipero) and I
am a car guy. It was
very convenient for
me to park at the
building and walk to
Ocean
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

I heard that CPD was treated poorly by some
adolescents from out of the area.

The City should have a promoter for future
year's events that has a strong connection
with owners of noteworthy cars. The Prancing
Ponies show is basically a "social gathering"
and not of vintage or COA heritage quality. I
believe the City should establish an economic
cost value for security, etc and (if transferable)
start an RFP immediately for a 5 or 10 yr
period. The City should also ask Jeannie
Freedman for the roster of all cars previously
submitted, asking them their price point
threshold for entering. Darius Sadeghi
625.5815
9/13/2022 19:09:51 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

As a Monterey County resident car week is my
favorite week of the year. No Wasnt there No Wasn't there They were okay.

Missed concours on
the avenue Yes.

Concours on the
avenue is a highlight
of the week for me.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/13/2022 19:14:59 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Very overcrowded in town so I avoided it for
many days No What event in the Park? What event on Ocean Avenue? They were okay.

I understand that they
are historical or
necessary or whatever
to bring in needed
funds so I do not mind
avoiding certain areas
during certain times.

Not really, unless the
majority of my fellow
residents want it. Then
I could go along with it
and not complain.

Ambivalence about
cars but I understand
that our financial
coffers need to be
considered.

I’m sorry, but living in North West
Carmel and not leaving my house
did not allow me to witness the
traffic calming measures.
9/13/2022 19:52:27 A retail shop owner in 93921, A worker in 93921 Loved it. Brings money to our area No Wish I could have seen it. Yes Loved it. They were okay.

I missed the concours
on the Ave, but I
understand the main
organizer passed
recently.

Yes.

It's crucial to keeping
Carmel part of Car
Week
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/13/2022 19:54:56 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

Grey events good Venus just hard to find
parking. No No Could not find parking Loved them. They had parking. Yes.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/13/2022 20:00:00 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

First time out there during car week. It great
meeting so many people and seeing great cars. No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? Didn’t attend any of the formal events They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.

Made it very hard to get around anywhere in
the evening and it took away from the
atmosphere of what I think car week should
be.
9/13/2022 20:14:25 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

A lot of the events in downtown Carmel are no
longer there. Concourse on the avenue, the
pebble beach tour end up on ocean avenue.

Roads closed at dark ect.. it just feels like
Carmel doesn’t want the car people in there city.

Just my opinion, I have been coming for car for
the last 15 years. Didn’t come in 2020 and 2021,
that’s why this year was such a let down. Yes It was okay. No What event on Ocean Avenue? They were okay.

Just not a lot of car
stuff like they had in
years past. Yes.

That’s what made
coming to downtown
Carmel
They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.

It just frustrated most people either visiting or
staying in the golden triangle. Police closed
ocean avenue but drove the bad behavior to
the outer streets. You don’t need to close
ocean avenue, it just needs to be policed.
9/13/2022 20:17:42 A resident of 93921, A worker in 93921 Loved it.

I’m in the automotive industry and I love cars.

Take Exotics back to Canary Row. Broadway is
not exotic at all. More like the Pits on Broadway
with exotic cars. Not appropriate! No What event in the Park?Yes Loved it. Loved them.

It’s the right venue for
the event. Yes.

It’s been the focus and
venue for these
events
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat. Need more volunteers
9/13/2022 20:29:31 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

It was my first time attending and so had no
expectations No No Loved them. Yes.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/13/2022 20:38:44 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

It was great to eat at the restaurants, visit the
shops, and watch the city decide to shut down
the cars going into the weekend. Yes It was okay. No What event on Ocean Avenue? Loved them. Yes.

It was like the city
didn’t want the cars or
people later on the
week
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Trying to find a handicapped parking spot at
any time after Thursday in the city was
impossible.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/13/2022 20:56:28 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it. No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? Loved them. Yes.

Monterey car week is
the standout event of
the year with a great
chance to view rare
automobiles with
fellow enthusiasts and
bring business to the
area
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/13/2022 20:58:55 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

Carmel seemed overrun in the evenings by
young attendees looking to film the next video.

While it’s fun to watch the various exotic cars, I’
m not sure how you control the crowds. We had
dinner reservations on Saturday night this year
and it was difficult to navigate in order to find
parking. We likely won’t schedule dinner in
downtown Carmel next year on Saturday as a
result. No No They were okay. Yes.

Carmel is a very neat
city & setting;
however, crowd
management would
help tremendously.

Perhaps a limited
number of tickets
available on a first
come first serve basis.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

I don’t know if shutting down traffic lanes in the
evening helped or just made it worse. Police
presence to keep everything under control
was nice.
9/13/2022 21:32:55 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

We got rid of all the events. Unfortunately, that
left it a circus for all the visitors to essentially
shut down the streets. Had we had formal
events, we not only would have brought in
revenue but could have limited who was there. Yes It was okay. No They were okay. Yes.

We have a beautiful
town. People are
already coming for
Car Week. People
look forward to these
events and they’re
well organized and
support our
community.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

They helped with safety as less cars could get
around and it likely limited all the “donuts”
done in the past. However, it didn’t help at all
with traffic. Again, if we had sanctioned events
, perhaps where ocean was closed, that would
eliminate the crazy driving.
9/13/2022 22:05:02 A resident of 93921 It was okay. Concours on the ave. and the P.B Yes It was okay. Yes It was okay. They were okay. Yes.

Those two events that
that have been held
here in Carmel-by-sea
are of the highest
quality and are
recognized throughout
the world “for must
see”.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

I believe social media practice’s makes it very
difficult to keep normal traffic flow . Safety in
the village is paramount !! We cannot have our
streets gridlocked because of the possible
need for emergency vehicles.
9/13/2022 22:15:29 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay. Missing concourse on the avenue No What event in the Park?No There were events? Yes.

Best events of car
week
They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.
9/13/2022 22:20:55 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 I did not like it at all.

Carmel by the sea ruined the car week vibe,
along with the ridiculous cops on electric
motorcycles who were harassing multiple car
owners. It was disgusting. I won’t be back. If you’
re trying to kill car week you’re doing a fantastic
job. No No I did not like them at all.

The events were
pathetic. No
You’ve already ruined
the experience, now
you want to bring
events back? The police were lawful and rude Never coming back 9/13/2022 22:47:34 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

Great atmosphere and important support of the
area businesses No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? Loved them.

Love to see cars and
meet great people Yes.

Very important events
for community
They helped with traffic and
safety. Sounds like a good compromise
9/13/2022 22:58:27 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

Only thing I didn’t like was missing concours on
the avenue, and that prancing ponies event. No No I did not like it at all. Yes.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/14/2022 1:37:31 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it. This has been a tradition and it’s great No No Loved them. Yes.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/14/2022 1:37:52 A resident of 93921 Loved it. It’s an amazing week Yes Loved it. Yes Loved it. Loved them. Yes.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/14/2022 7:00:27 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it. Great venue, people and cars. It’s awesome! No What event in the Park?No Na Loved them. No They helped with traffic and
safety. They were unnecessary.
9/14/2022 7:05:47 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

Did not like the sideshow characters causing
scenes No No Loved them. Yes.

Those are literally the
biggest draw for me
and many more fans
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/14/2022 7:14:33 A worker in 93921 It was okay.

Expensive cars blocking roadways and causing
traffic for no other reason than to show off. Yes It was okay. Yes It was okay. They were okay.

Creates lots of traffic
and large wait times
for restaurants No
Carmel is a small town
and cannot handle the
increase in
foot/vehicle traffic
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Still too many impatient drivers speeding
around
9/14/2022 9:00:09 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

It’s a week of excitement for our beautiful, quiet
little village. And when it’s over we go back to
being a quiet little village. Yes It was okay. Yes Loved it. Loved them. Yes.

They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/14/2022 9:54:17 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

It was quiet and lovely. COTA was sort of fun
when it was unique, but there are currently so
many similar events in the area that it just seems
unnecessary and intrusive. We know there is
money to be made and taxes to be collected, but
is it really worth the extra security and increased
administrative costs? Concours D'Elegance is
the crown jewel and Carmel government,
Foundation and businesses benefit plenty
without the chaos of another car event that
closes our streets. No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? I didn't love them because I didn't attend. but they were nice and small -- a good fit for a small village.

Do we really want to
use Devendorf Park
for car sales? ugh
Yes to the Tour, no to
COTA
The Tour is a grand
tradition which allows
us to see the
extraordinary
automobiles that have
qualified for the
Sunday event, and is
in an elevated class
above all other car
events in the area.

The lunch stop is a
perfect use of
Devendorf Park and
Ocean Avenue. The
audience is very
civilized. We are much
more aligned with
Concours d'Elegance
and should embrace
the opportunity to
support them.

However, it looked like
they were very happy
to have lunch in
Pebble Beach instead
this year, probably
because they are not
competing with
another event that
shuts down the
streets.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Because there were no big car events like
COTA and Tour, the comparison between
2022 and years past is not valid.
9/14/2022 10:08:40 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

Love the excitement and the money it brings into
the community No No Loved them. No
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat. Need more traffic control though
9/14/2022 10:17:42
9/14/2022 11:28:03 A resident of 93921, A worker in 93921 It was okay.

Missed having the free concours on the avenue
event No What event in the Park?Yes It was okay. They were okay.

I liked the fashion
show which included
local retailers Yes. Free to attend
They helped with traffic and
safety.

It seemed to deter problematic side shows on
Ocean Ave.
9/14/2022 11:50:44 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Bad behavior by visitors and too many noisy
vehicles racing. No I did not like it at all. No What event on Ocean Avenue? I did not like them at all.Too disruptive No Too disruptive,
compromises public
safety responses, too
much noise and
reckless driving
threatens pedestrians
walking Carmel’s
streets.

They did not help with traffic and
safety at all. Witnessed problems
9/14/2022 12:43:58 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it. Need more cars! Rare exotics. No No Loved them. Rare cars Yes.

Chance to see cars up
close
Closing down ocean avenue
made for worse crowds and traffic
flow
Disruptive to people trying to find parking and
caused more pedestrian obstructions
9/14/2022 13:09:36 An innkeeper in 93921 Loved it.

Slow start to the week, but picked up starting on
Thursday No No Yes.

Would draw more to
the area, particularly if
they occur earlier in
the week
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/14/2022 14:43:25 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

Tuesday cars on ocean was eliminated. It must
come back next year. No Yes Loved it. They were okay. Yes.

They did not help with traffic and
safety at all. All they did was give out unwarranted tickets! 9/14/2022 15:02:47 A resident of 93921 It was okay. enjoyed the car day of past years. No No Yes. for one day it is fun
and not disruptive,
easy to attend and
free
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/14/2022 15:42:57 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

Part of the reason we purchased a house in
Carmel by the sea is to have east access to car
week. No Yes It was okay. They were okay.

Only attended
Prancing Ponies this
year, other than just
walking down to
ocean ave in the
evenings to see what
was out. Yes.

Fantastic event in the
past, missed it this
year.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

As much as I like car week, I don’t necessarily
love guys dragging up and down ocean ave.

This at least made the drivers slow down a
little.
9/14/2022 16:12:31 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay. Yes It was okay. No They were okay. Yes.

They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.
9/14/2022 19:44:57 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 I did not like it at all.

The lack of quality events there - Prancing
Ponies def doesn’t qualify - was a big
disappointment. As a result we barely spent any
time in Carmel this year, and will probably come
to car week later next year if the Ocean ave
concours doesn’t return. This was our 20th year
attending car week. No Can see new Hondas at the dealership. Yes Poorly attended They were okay.

A shadow of former
years Yes.

That’s a big part of
what car week is!
Classic and unique
vehicles normally
never seen
They helped with traffic and
safety.
2019 was a gong show, that level of attendee
is not needed nor wanted.
9/14/2022 20:47:05 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

Plenty of cars and diversity for people , plenty of
new food spots to try and support local
businesses No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? Loved them. Yes.

More room for people
to explore , plus costal
has cooler weather
near water ,
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

More focused on random small tickets for cars
over the line
9/14/2022 20:51:30 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

It’s our fourth year going and we still enjoyed it
although we left on the 18th to go to Capitola.

Next year we’re going to stay Sunday to Sunday. No What event in the Park?Yes Loved it. Loved them.

Why would anybody
not love it Yes.

Really miss the
concourse on the
Avenue this year. No problems for us
We stayed in a hotel a block away and so we
didn’t notice any traffic problems.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/14/2022 22:50:38 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

If I could express my gratitude straight to the
city/residents of Carmel I would. Some of the
things that they put up with during the week are
something else. This year, in my opinion, was
much better in comparison to a few years ago,
say 2019 when people blatantly disrespected the
people & police of Carmel by being super
annoying with their cars. When I was there, most
of the action was usually taking place on Ocean
Avenue. I didn’t hear too many loud noises, see
reckless driving, & even though I’m not a
resident I thought it was much more bearable
especially in the evening hours. Regardless of
the yearly revenue that Monterey Car Week
brings in, I am especially grateful that it
continues to be one of the greater areas of the
peninsula during and apart from Monterey car
week. The police work done during the week
was great and seemed to keep people in line in
order to create positive experiences for
themselves and others around them. Thanks
again to all who help make it possible. No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? Loved them.

I didn’t attend the tour
D’elegance this year
but in prior years I
enjoyed it. I think one
positive thing that
would benefit both
parties would be some
time to stay on the
sidewalks when all the
cars park. Speaking
from a photographers
perspective, I think
everyone would enjoy
getting a few full
photos of cars before
people swarm around
them. Wonderful event
otherwise. Super
disappointed I missed
this year! Yes.

I think in terms of
Carmel city it brings in
a lot of revenue during
these times especially
to restaurants. In
regards to attendees,
these events are so
special to us and
when they’re free, it
helps college students
like me, and families
as well, see vehicles I
only dream of being
able to see when I
don’t have the means
to pay for the higher
priced events. Super
thankful that Carmel
puts these on and I
hope to continue to
see the tour and
concours on the
avenue continue in the
future.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

I said before in another response how back in
2019 I believe, I don’t think there was as much
enforcement on obeying traffic laws in
comparison to last year and this years week.

With a combination of donuts, excessive
revving and burnouts I agree with a stricter
level of enforcement. I’m not sure to what
effect or reason keeping streets closed during
later hours does, but it did seem to mitigate
risk of endangerment to pedestrians and
vehicles alike. I think there are some instances
where there should be leniency in the case of
a couple loud noises, it did seem that they
were particularly strict this year on such matter
but that helped the local residents sleep as
well. It is car week, and I think that engines
revving and accelerations are imminent. I do
believe while that is a part of the experience, it
should be done in a safe and respectful manner.
9/14/2022 22:56:15 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

This area is known to celebrate beautiful cars
like art and artistic display; love the festiveness,
anticipation leading up to the final day. Yes Loved it. Yes Loved it. Loved them.

The event is unique
w/it’s international
influence as well as its
All American
influence—being an
American sport to
collect or race cars;
Laguna Seca is also a
treasure to
complement the
event. Yes.

If you build it they will
come! People love
coming to see so
many gorgeous cars
in one place.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

Always a good thing to make it known the City
takes safety seriously; visitors need to be
respectful, responsible, and aware the City
can’t/won’t tolerate anything less
9/15/2022 0:06:27 A resident of 93921 Loved it. Amazing cars Yes Loved it. Yes It was okay. They were okay. Not enough events Yes.

They are staples of
car week
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/15/2022 0:39:56 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

It’s an amazing area that is perfect to enjoy cars
and just overall have a good time. I love the
scenery and the events that go on each year. Yes Loved it. No I have to check it out next time. Loved them.

The events are always
a hit with me there. Yes.

They’re awesome
events I always look
forward to watching
them.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/15/2022 9:13:31 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

Too much police presence. People were pulled
over more than driving and it burned out the
cruising. No loud exhaust or revving robbed
people of the opportunity to hear supercars.

Same thing in Monterey. No Did not attend Yes Loved it. They were okay.

Once again too much
police presence
shutting down car
owners from having
fun Yes. I like concours
They helped with traffic and
safety. Did not have any issues with travels
9/15/2022 11:21:24 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Mayhem, way too many people with supercars
running amok and showing off. No No I did not like them at all.I'm over it No I'm over it all.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat. The whole thing has gotten too big.
9/15/2022 11:37:02 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

Brings in business and publicity for Carmel and
the surrounding area. A good tradition to keep
going through the coming years. Police did a
good job of keeping everything under control as
well. No N/A Yes Loved it. Loved them.

Great atmosphere of
bringing people
together. Yes.

Keeps the tradition
and is more
reminiscent of the
original Car Week feel
of where it started with
the Concours.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

Keeps the wrong crowd out of the area and
establishes that recklessness won’t be
tolerated.
9/15/2022 15:44:52 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

I loved that they changed the schedule of the
Reunion so that Saturday was the final day,
clearing the conflict with Pebble Beach that has
been in place since I began attending in 1984.

As a working journalist, it meant I no longer had
to give up the last day at Laguna Seca to cover
the Pebble Beach event for the magazine that
sent me there. No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? They were okay.

My assignments were
specifically at Laguna
Seca and Pebble, but
friends and fellow
journalists were quite
disappointed in the
way some other
events (Concours on
the Avenue in
particular) were
downplayed or simply
cancelled this year. Yes.

Time permitting, I
would love to see the
Concours on the
Avenue. My wife was
able to walk around
Carmel for several
hours while I was at
Pebble (the media
pass for the Concours
did not include her),
and she always loves
browsing the galleries
and shops, and she
found a lovely French
restaurant, La
Bicyclette, where we
had a delicious meal.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Our 2021 visit to Carmel was made almost
impassible, if not impossible, by the gridlock.

As much as I love the automobile-related
events, it was somewhat easier to negotiate
the streets of Carmel on Sunday.
9/15/2022 17:42:53 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

Its a good event to people Who love cars and for
local commerce Yes Loved it. Yes Loved it. Loved them. It was very awesome Yes.

These are great
events
They helped with traffic and
safety. Its useful
9/15/2022 19:47:25 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

Car Week gives me a reason to go visit my
friends and enjoy the views! Yes It was okay. No Loved them. Yes.

I wasn’t a fan of the police
shutting down Ocean Ave!!
Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/15/2022 21:33:45 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

We need the big Car Week events back in
Carmel-by-the-Sea, it was too dull this year
without them. Any why were there no events
scheduled at Sunset Center in August? That is
just plain stupid to have a venue like Sunset
Center just sit idle during such a popular month. No What event in the Park?No Why was it gender focused? Isn’t that gender discrimination? They were okay.

We need the big
events back in
Carmel-by-the-Sea, it
was too dull this year
without them. Any
why were there no
events scheduled at
Sunset Center in
August? That is just
plain stupid to have a
venue like Sunset
Center just sit idle
during such a popular
month. Yes.

We need these types
of events to return so
Carmel-by-the-Sea
can regain its
following and have
events enjoyed by
both locals and
visitors.

They did not help with traffic and
safety at all. It was very inconvenient.
9/15/2022 21:33:57 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

Peoples behaving badly, a seedy element that I
haven’t witnessed before No Yes It was okay. I did not like them at all.

Not like the old days.

Too much trailer trash Yes. I liked the old tour
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Not enough enforcement. More tickets and
impound..cars shouldn’t be allowed to cruise
9/15/2022 22:03:30 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Not as good as last year. Need to bring back
Ocean Avenue events. Yes It was okay. Yes Loved it. They were okay.

Not as exciting as in
past years. Yes.

Carmel, has evolved
to become an event
location.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

The radius of 50 miles surrounding Carmel,
rowdies disrupted a very nice event on Carmel
in general.
9/15/2022 22:06:51 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

The traffic was well controlled and not too
crowded. No This event is just mediocre at best. I feel that the city to just trying to be equitable and that many, many other events would be better. For example, the Pacific Grove Car Rotary Show that used to tour through Carmel was wThey were okay.

Bring back the local
events. See above! Yes.

It brings more
business to town.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/15/2022 22:37:41 A resident of 93921 It was okay. Not enough events No What event in the Park?Yes It was okay. They were okay. Yes.

It makes Carmel
special
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/16/2022 0:14:14 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

The city needs upscale and community events to
remain vibrate and relevant. Tourism and new
ideas and events help a community
communicate and interact with each other. We
are a welcoming and volunteering people and
these events help our nonprofits and businesses.

We have an excellent police department with
very quick response for any type of call. No No Loved them.

Great four our
community. Yes.

Concours dElegance
is one of the premier
international events.

Any city in the US
would be happy to
host this event. I
volunteered for 15
years and they are the
best at preparation
and operation. They
care about their
employees, residents
and the surrounding
community. Please
ask them to return. A
huge loss to Carmel
when they left.

They helped with traffic and
safety. Results
9/16/2022 5:05:40 A retail shop owner in 93921 It was okay.

The lack of the two events (Tuesday &
Thursday), made Carmel appear to not be an
important stop during car week. Many of our
regular clients attended other events in the
apeninsula and skipped Carmel on their visit,
resulting in a big decline in sales primarily on
these two days. Yes I did not like it at all. Yes It was okay. We needed more events with an upscale vibe like the usual Tuesday & Thursday events.

See explanations
above Yes.

Carmel should always
be an important
visiting stop during car
week with events that
befit our town.

Concours on the Ave
was sorely missed.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/16/2022 5:20:01 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

I live on Monte Verde St. I had difficulty getting in
and out of my house and my garage because of
crowds on the sidewalk and in the street. The
revving of engines and then the loud roars of
people responding to the revving was annoying
as hell. By Wednesday I couldn't stand it
anymore and left town for the duration. No No I did not like them at all. No These events
completely hijack life
for residents. It's noisy
and obnoxious.

I can't say. I try not to leave my
house during this event.
9/16/2022 6:16:22 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Crowds, traffic, noise. No respect for the people
who live here! No I did not like it at all. No I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all.See previous No Same as before They did not help with traffic and
safety at all. See prior
9/16/2022 6:17:25 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Too many car clubs that ignore the road laws,
especially down hwy 1. We do not have enough
law enforcement to handle the large crowds, now
bringing in some bad elements. We are a small
community and are starting to feel we come
second to the event. The amount of money it
brings in is for only a few, I do not see how it
helps the community as a whole. No No They were okay.

The car show use to
be a long weekend,
now it’s
inconveniencing us for
over a week No
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/16/2022 7:11:04 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it. Not overwhelming No It was okay. No It was okay. They were okay.

Small scale. Not really
special Yes.

Spectacular events
showcasing Carmel
They helped with traffic and
safety. Not as many problems with hooligans
9/16/2022 7:13:01 A resident of 93921 Loved it. I love having the car events in town Yes Loved it. Yes It was okay. They were okay.

I missed having the
Concours on the
Avenue and having
the Pebble Beach
Tour stop in town. Yes.

I like the cars and I
think it is good for the
City
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/16/2022 7:35:14 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Wish you guys would bring back the Concours
on the Avenue and the Pebble Beach Tour. It’s
so nice to live in town and be able to avoid all the
traffic and just walk to see the cars. Yes It was okay. No They were okay. Yes.

Those are the best of
the best cars wise and
as previously stated
so nice to live in town
and be able to walk to
them and again all the
traffic.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/16/2022 8:09:29 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

The cars are magnificent works of art and
history. Car week makes it possible to see so
many in one place. The owners are happy to
share information about their cars. Yes I enjoyed the event in the park. Not necessarily an Acura fan. Yes Loved it. Loved them.

I enjoy attending the
events with friends. It’
s something we look
forward to from year to
year. We watch the
cars, people and shop
downtown. Yes.

Concourse on the
Avenue was a great
event that allowed you
to look at cars and
also stop and listen to
owners discussing
their cars. The tour of
d’elegance gives us
the ability to see some
of the magnificent cars
that are entered into
the concours d’
elegance if you are
not able to purchase
tickets for the Sunday
event.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

I did not have any problems driving around
town or walking to the prancing ponies event.
9/16/2022 8:15:54 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

The only negative was the racing of loud cars on
Highway 1 and neighboring streets. It seems as
if the car owners want to be noticed and making
the sound of a road race is their method of
securing attention. It is VERY annoying to us
locals. No Did not attend Yes Loved it. Loved them.

The beautiful cars and
friendly people Yes.

For Carmel, it is the
only way to partake in
the festivities without
paying $500+. The
event was a stroke of
genius and gets
everyone is Carmel
involved.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

In 2019 I witnessed the hooligans during their
dangerous driving and head-to-head
confrontations with police. Not something I
ever want in Carmel.
9/16/2022 8:24:17 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

It disrupts every aspect of living in Carmel by the
Sea. My neighborhood is always full of cars
making it hard to have a normal week. Car
owners are the most part rude. No I did not like it at all. No I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all.

Who needs to see
people showing off
their cars? No
Disruptive and
unnecessary.

They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.

Guests ( not for car show) couldn’t park near
us.
9/16/2022 8:28:52 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all. No I did not like it at all. No I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all. No They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/16/2022 8:44:49 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

I love muscle cars and car week is the
undisputed leader in bring together car lovers of
all types No What event in the Park?No Loved it. Loved them. Yes.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/16/2022 8:55:47 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

I enjoyed it when it was VINTAGE cars, now it
seems to be mostly race cars, and the type of
people that like loud and fast. No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? I did not like them at all.

Again, used to be
about VINTAGE cars
(10s-40s)d now about
race cars NoCarmel is too small a
town for that
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/16/2022 9:14:30 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

Naturally missed the display of cars on Ocean,
lot of work, hope it comes back, it was such a
fun, joyous street fair atmosphere, however this
year survived without incident and exotic,
beautiful cars were abundantly roaming our
Village with gleeful spectators,… I Loved It! Yes The Host were very nice but kind of generic, just looked like they were taking an advantage to sell there cars. No Wasn’t there Loved them.

Great opportunity to
mingle, view and
enjoy the atmosphere
of cordial locals and
tourists. Yes.

It is great for the
Village but I’ll tell you
our restaurants could
use some lessons in
service, hosting,
manners and the taste
of their food, I can
count on one hand
places I would
recommend as places
to dine in Carmel.

Proprietors seem to
take for granted that
our Village will always
have tourists and
therefore do not need
to put their best foot
forward all the time in
Service, Taste of Food
and Price.

They helped with traffic and
safety. Never had a problem getting around.
9/16/2022 9:21:52 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

No Concours on the Avenue and no Tour de
Elegance. Sorry, but Prancing Ponies does not
generate the same excitement. I would also
imagine that not having the two events hurt retail
revenue, but that is just a guess. Yes It was okay. Yes It was okay. They were okay.

They lack the
excitement of the
Concours on the
Avenue and the Tour.

Yes.

That is a major part of
the draw of Car Week.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/16/2022 9:53:18 A resident of 93921 Loved it. No No Yes.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/16/2022 10:05:16 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Missed the closing of Ocean Avenue fir one day
... big loss ! Yes Yes Loved it. They were okay. Not very exciting Yes.

Again ... closing
Ocean Ave again
would be ...

WONDERFUL!
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/16/2022 11:49:36 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Too many cars from other nearby areas come to
race down our residential areas, not enough
enforcement. No It was okay. No They were okay. No
Those events are too
big for our small town.

They cause too many
traffic and noise
problems.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/16/2022 12:18:24 A worker in 93921, A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it. Streets not overly crowded No I did not like it at all. No What event on Ocean Avenue? They were okay. Yes.

COTA is a highlight of
Car Week and it only
one day
They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.

Need active traffic control at Ocean and
Junipero. Crossing pedestrians hold up lines
of traffic!
9/16/2022 13:00:01 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 I did not like it at all. Event canceled due to death No Not substantial enough to justify attending No Did not attend, too narrowly focused of an event Did not attend any events in Carmel Major event canceled
due to death of the
“promoter” Yes.

Larger events are
more inclusive and
serve broader
interests
They helped with traffic and
safety. Alcohol consumption causes bad behavior
Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/16/2022 13:06:04 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Cars racing at break-neck speed through our
town, running stop signs, racing engines all
through the night. Impossible to get anywhere
because of traffic and discourteous people
blocking the roads. I couldn't even walk my dog
without fear of getting run over. It should be held
at Laguna Seca on a race track. No No I did not like them at all.

Same answer as
before No
All events should be
held at a venue that
can take care of
racing cars. NOT on
our local streets.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

I was walking my dog mid day during the
week, and at the intersection at Monte Verde
and 4th approximately 10-15 Ferrari's ran the
stop sign. No one was around to ticket them.

Why should this be the norm? Why are these
inconsiderate and unlawful people allowed to
disregard rules and laws? Also, when people
say "it's good for business" all I can think
about are the people that live here 365 days a
year and pay taxes? What about our "good for
business" money that we use here 365 days?
Our money is more plentiful than those that
come for a day or two. The residents needs
should be of more concern than those "out of
towners". Again, have these events at a venue
that can support them not in a small town on
residential streets.
9/16/2022 13:20:46 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all. Hectic, and impossible to get any where No No It's crazy to think that this is a charity event. If the sponsor donated the proceeds from just one of their cars they could donate far more to charity. I did not like them at all.

Laws were broken
with total disregard.

Speeding, running
stop signs, etc. It is a
miracle that no one
was/is killed. No
Our village cannot
safely manage these
events. There are
venues that can.

Those coming to them
still need a place to
stay and restaurants
to eat at.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Our residential streets should not be holding
events that encourage visitors and out-oftowners to blatantly break the law. I live across from City Hall and could not drive out of my
driveway because of the careless people
blocking the street. I could not get a delivery
the entire week. I couldn't keep any
appointments. What if an emergency
happened?
9/16/2022 14:06:04 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 I did not like it at all.

The Green Porsche is the trouble maker. https:
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fys5s8SVVcg No I did not like it at all. Yes It was okay. They were okay.

We are missing two
key events. Yes.

Its part of Car Week's
history
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/16/2022 14:14:23 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

I generally love how quiet the town is. But this is
one of the few weeks where it is a destination
spot! I do love seeing all of the cars. And if we
don’t feel like dealing with the crowds it’s an
opportunity to get away. No What event in the Park?Yes It was okay. They were okay.

Missed the Acura
event totally. The
prancing ponies was
fine, an interesting
concept. No issues
with it. Yes.

The Tour de Elegance
was one of the
highlights of the
week!! I do miss that
and wish it would
return. So amazing to
see those cars going,
and to be able to take
a closer look at them
parked on Ocean was
a treat.

They certainly helped. There is an aspect of
the public on Friday and Saturday nights that
gets slightly intimidating, but seems to be
perfectly safe.
9/16/2022 15:27:58 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay. Yes. 9/16/2022 15:30:26 A resident of 93921 It was okay. Miss the concours on Ocean. No It was okay. Yes It was okay. Loved them. Yes.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/16/2022 15:46:15 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

While I love and fully support the idea and drive
behind the prancing ponies event, and truly hope
they can continue to host their event in
downtown, their selection of cars leaves a little to
be desired. I wholeheartedly support the return
of both the concourse on the avenue and the
tour de elegance. They are all great events and
the only events I make plans to attend. No While I think it is cool to have events in the park, and have checked them out in the past, I did not make time to check it out this year. Yes I love what this event represents, I brought my wife and 6 week old daughter with me this year. It was the first ever car show for both. I really hope I can bring my daughter to this show for many years to come. I was only really aware of the prancing ponies and Acura events. I think those are two nice events but would really like more variety in downtown. *see above (basically,
would just love more
events) Yes.

I have lived just
outside of city limits
(93923) for 30+ years
and have attended
Peale beach concours
only once (when gifted
a free ticket). But I
attended almost every
tour, and concours on
the avenue since their
inception. Having
those events walking
distance from my
home and free has
really make me look
forward to car week.

Despite all the traffic
and congestion and
people on the
peninsula, that feels
like a little gift for the
locals.

I’m not sure how well they actually
worked but I support the idea of
shutting down idiots who want to
speed and do doughnuts. *see above
9/16/2022 15:46:46 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Inconsiderate attendees were speeding and
revving their engines loudly at night. No What event in the Park?Yes It was okay. They were okay.

I would like to see
more elegant
Concours events as it
seems to attract a
more mindful attendee
than car week in
general with its fratlike atmosphere. Also,
I would like to see
more emphasis on
electric cars given
climate change. Yes.

It would be nice to
have that energy on
town as well as other
kinds of elegant
events throughout the
year.

They did not help with traffic and
safety at all. so much speeding and car revving
Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/16/2022 16:57:22 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Cars driving irresponsibly, noise, bad element
coming to town with violent behavior. Was just
happy it was over. Been there, done that in
regards to seeing cars. When you think about all
the pollution caused by all the trucks bringing the
Concours cars here it doesn't seem very
environmentally positive. Yes Ho hum. Yes It's nice to give people a way to show off their cars but the affect on the Village isn't worth it. After a few. years of seeing it the consequences of the crowds and bad behavior isn't worth it. Let the Concours take the lead and don't make CBTS a factor.

Bad behavior by the
crowd that is drawn
into town. It is just
going to get worse
and worse as crime in
surrounding
communities
continues to go up.

We are a magnet for
people to come and
show off their bad
behavior. No Same as above. No affect in my neighborhood.

People were blowing through stop signs
without slowing down, driving noisy cars way
too fast, and just being plain rude as drivers.
9/16/2022 17:11:07 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Instead of blocking the Ocean ave. by our police
department, they should’ve kept the street open
but have a visible presence to curtail and
discourage any mischievous behavior. By
blocking the street, our business community did
suffer and they did lost business. No No They were okay.

The City and the
community should be
much more pro-active
during the car week.

We do get lost of
visitors and they come
to see car activities
and if such activities
are downplayed, they
may not come back.

This is the time where
everyone makes
money for not only for
our community abroad
but also for charitable
organizations that they
depend on such
revenue. Yes.

This has been the
heartbeat of the Car
week for the locals.

This is where people
can mingle and see
most of the cars that
may be too expensive
to see in private
venues. Please bring
it back for the sake of
the community and
the car lovers.

They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.

Please see my earlier comment. Do not close
the street but have officer present with their
patrol cars.

People do behave when the police is
physically present.
9/16/2022 17:24:24 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 I did not like it at all.

Concourse on the Avenue is a truly wonderful
event I hope is able to return No What event in the Park?No Yes.

Both are unique
events that do not
involve the “idiots”
who have caused
traffic issues in the
past. Gives an
opportunity to the
common person to
participate in car
week, in a great
venue, without cost.

Always enjoy taking in
the shops and dining
while there for those
events.
9/16/2022 17:25:04 A resident of 93921 It was okay. Have the regular car week activities return Yes It was okay. Yes Loved it. They were okay.

Return all car week
activities in the village Yes.

It is a great time, lots
of fun, good for the
village and shops and
restaurants
They helped with traffic and
safety.

Closing streets and more police presence is a
good thing, helps keep all safe.
9/16/2022 17:28:46 A resident of 93921 It was okay. No It was okay. No It was okay. They were okay. Yes.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/16/2022 17:29:34 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

I missed the car show on Ocean, and the classic
cars on parade… I do not like how people have
turned our local residential streets into drag
racing, loud modified cars, speeding roads. No No Missed to cars on Ocean Yes.

Concourse on the
Ave, brought a lot of
beautiful autos, and
people, it’s controlled,
and organized, not
just a free for all drag
racing…
They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.
9/16/2022 17:43:29 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

The big event on Tuesday was missed by many
of our friends. We live in Tehama No What event in the Park?Yes It was okay. What events? Not clear which were
open to everyone. Yes.

It was great for out of
town guests. We
walked Ocean and
then had lunch. It was
large enough that it
was worth the effort to
go.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat. Did not notice huge differences
9/16/2022 17:56:13 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

My favorite events no longer happen. It’s not the
same without the Tuesday Concourse on the
Avenues (my favorite event of the entire week),
and Thursday’s parade of PB Concourse cars. It’
s ridiculous that these two events no longer take
place. Looks like Carmel is no longer
participating in the week’s events and that
Pacific Grove has stepped up to fill in for Carmel.

However, I applaud Carmel for cracking down on
the morons doing doughnuts and burn-outs at
the intersections on Ocean. No What event in the Park?Yes I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all.

The Acura event is a
joke, and Prancing
Ponies is a bit of a
mystery, seemingly
run by 2 or 3 women,
and with a strange
collection of cars. Not
very enticing, crappy
music, just not much
fun. Yes.

They are the best
events with the best
cars and the best
crowds of people.

They make car week.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

They didn’t solve the entire problem of the
morons doing burn-outs on Ocean, but the
effort helped.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/16/2022 18:27:04 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Without Concours on the Avenue it was very
dull. Yes I did not like it at all. Yes Not very good. Small number of uninspiring cars I did not like them at all. Yes.

It brings a vibrancy to
our town. Makes our
town an important
destination in the
biggest week of the
year on the Monterey
Peninsula.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/16/2022 18:29:39 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

We missed the Tuesday car show. Was always
a fun, exciting event. Well organized, civilized
and a credit to our village. Missed the
Concourse cars stopping in town on Thursday.

What did we have this year? A small Prancing
Piny show and lots of people here to go to
events in other towns. Yes It was okay. Yes It was okay. They were okay.

Our events were
small, no energy, no
pizzazz. All we got
were unruly crowds at
night, which kept
many of us from
coming into town for
the evenings. Yes.

Those were class.
classic events that
brought people into
our village during the
days. Vibrant crowds.

All we get now is the
drunk trouble makers
at night.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/16/2022 19:21:12 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

The associated noise and cars racing in and
around town. Not clear to me that they were part
of a sanctioned car week event, but that all
comes with it so I have a negative opinion. Even
the sanctioned events with all the idling and
exhaust would be better held outside of Carmel,
or minimally only involve parked cars. No Yes I did not like it at all. No See response above.

It will be markedly
worse than this year
without the larger
events. How about an
e-car event and drop
the gassy noisy cars.
9/16/2022 20:21:36 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all. Lack of events No No I did not like them at all. Yes. It brings the city to life They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/16/2022 21:35:53 A resident of 93921 Loved it. No Loved them. Yes.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/16/2022 21:59:50 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

Great influx of cars, tourists and a much needed
injection of fun to the city No Yes Loved it. Loved them.

Cars and Carmel go
together perfectly.

Brought life to the city Yes.

It’s great fun and
brings in a great
crowd you won’t find
on other weeks.

Exposes the world to
how great Carmel is.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat. It helped.
9/17/2022 2:01:37 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay. I miss the Tour d' Elegance stopping in Carmel. No Yes Loved it. Loved them.

I love cars. It doesn't
matter if I see them on
the street or at a
show. I get excited.

I've been attending
car week since 1996.
2020 it was cancelled. Yes.

Those are my favorite
events.

They helped with traffic and
safety. Safety is importsnt.
9/17/2022 4:11:14 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

Better control over lawlessness and debauchery
versus previous years! No Did not attend...but I love Acura vehicles though! No In the interest of fairness, diversity, and inclusion, we should also be soliciting bids for car shows focused on The Vertically Challenged, The Lactose Intolerant, and Zulu Tribe Natives Born In 1952. Loved them.

The events are
irrelevant. I just love
anything Carmel! Yes.

It's the money, baby.

We need the tax
revenue.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

Seriously...this is THE most important thing for
the City to focus on. Someone is going to get
killed by one of these out-of-control hotrodders if our Police and City Planners don't remain vigilant. Please keep being proactive
on this subject. Thank you!
9/17/2022 8:15:49 A worker in 93921, A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay. the best part was ALWAYS the big car event.....
not the ponies Yes It was okay. Yes I did not like it at all. They were okay. just didn't have that
Carmel feeling and
atmosphere that
makes Carmel fun and
great.....booring
events this year. Yes.
you had to ask!!!!!!
they are fun and
exciting and add to
Carmel as being part
of the peninsula.......
never mind the dollars
and people these
events bring into our
town. Don't fret about
the parking issue.....
there's not a lot of
parking every day
anyway....it's normal
They helped with traffic and
safety.
in a town our size, it's also normal to do that
for an event......SAFETY is ALWAYS first!!!!
Traffic is what it is....nothing new....local and
shops should be informed more so their
employees can plan property.....GREAT IDEA
the shuttle....use it more......
9/17/2022 8:37:09 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

It’s always been a problem for me as a local. Too
many people and too much noise pollution. No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? I did not like them at all.

I have never been a
fan of Car Week. No
I don’t think I need to
explain.

It seems to me that an event
centered around cars in our
present environmental crisis
(climate change) is irresponsible
and given what happened with the
police this year asking for
problems.

Climate change and a huge problem for locals
who live here full time.
9/17/2022 8:54:19 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

I missed the Concours on the Avenue and the
Tour d'Elegance stopping on Ocean Ave. No Yes Loved it. They were okay.

Not enough variety of
classic cars. Yes.

Great cars, great
crowds and good for
the town's image and
businesses.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

Blocking Ocean Ave at critical times appears
to be effective.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/17/2022 11:21:24 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

My year revolves around Car Week, since 1987,
almost. I moved from Saratoga to Carmel (0
Torres SW 9th) in 2020, but I never missed Car
Week. (I bought the 2nd Murphy House on
Dolores between 9th and 10th in 1983.) The loss
of Concours on the Avenue - sad that no one
could keep it alive. That is the single best event
of the week. And for the Pebble Beach cars to
not stop for lunch on Thursday has been a
disappointment for a few years now. By the
same token, for the Pacific Grove Auto Rally to
no longer stop in Carmel on Fridays is sad. I
drove in that event each year since it started in
1994. Ocean Avenue used to be lined with
cheering, happy people.- it was sublime. The
Acura thing this year was a joke, nothing more
than a new car showroom outdoors. Prancing
Ponies brought some pretty great cars out,
though some of the models had more of a
Hollywood vibe. But it was a fun event. And the
CPD seems to have gotten the better of the
morons driving 600 hp Lambos and Dodges on
Friday and Saturday nights. Bravo! Yes I did not like it at all. Yes It was okay.

A sadly minimal
participation
compared to PG and
Monterey. I really
hope CBTS will get in
the game. Yes.

I've seen and felt the
great energy these
things bring. Carmel is
a privileged place, and
I know that residents
treasure the quiet
calmness here. But for
a few days during a
single week to bring
some authentic
excitement and
energy - that makes
the quiet that follows
even more treasured.

Kind of how we love
the holidays, and then
how we enjoy the
peace after New
Years.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

I watched the street scene from 8:30 to 9:30
Friday and Saturday nights. Seemed much
better than 2021. And that's a lot of
testosterone to manage!
9/17/2022 14:55:00 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

I greatly miss the Tuesday Concours on the
Avenue No Miss the Concours on the Avenue No What event on Ocean Avenue? I I leave Wednesday to
avoid the congestion. Yes.

COTA was my favorite
event; relatively low
key and on Tuesday
before the craziness
They helped with traffic and
safety.

From what I understand, they are necessary
given the later week congestion and craziness
9/17/2022 16:07:12 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Traffic congestion, rude visitors, excessive noise
at all hours, no benefit to the residents. No I did not attend due to congestion from the event. No I did not attend due to congestion from event. I did not like them at all.

Traffic congestion,
rude visitors,
excessive noise, no
benefit to the
residents. No
Even more traffic
congestion, more rude
visitors, more
excessive noise.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Coming back home on Ocean avenue from
family event were directed through a maize of
unsafe routes through 6th street packed with
vehicles and pedestrians. City needs more
signage when traffic entering Ocean Avenue
or Rio Road so that residents can use
alternate routes to their homes.
9/17/2022 16:58:09 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

I missed having the Concours d'Elegance drive
through the city. No No comment. Yes It was okay. They were okay.

I missed the
loudspeaker
commentary. It would
help with crowd
control if there was an
occasional welcome
and please be mindful
of this or that. In
addition to
commenting on
special cars, the
commentator could
encourage patronage
and give historical
anecdotes about past
Carmel Car Shows. Yes.

I like the American
love affair with the car
and that romance may
well end as we move
into a new era of
transportation.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

As far as I know, no one was injured or killed
by a moving vehicle during Car Week, but I
could be misinformed.
9/17/2022 17:02:39 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

The people it drew in behaved horribly. Friday
night’s crowds on Ocean Ave along egging on
the sooped up, loud cars was sad to see. A
truck belching smoke out as it went by and
everyone cheering was atrocious. I was
embarrassed to say I lived in Carmel. And the
vandalism to the new police vehicle on Thursday
was something that should never happen. No Did not attend No Did not attend Loved them.

Because they are
“Carmel”. Keeping on
the small home town
tradition. Yes.

Concours on the
avenue was a great
event.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

I believe it helped discourage drag racing thru
town, by slowing cars down, but it did not
discourage the type of people we don’t want
here. They were going so slow on Ocean Ave
which gave them more time to rile up the
crowds. I sincerely believe Ocean Avenue
should be closed down completely. We are
already planning to go out of town next year
should things remain the same. So sorry to
say that, but it just keeps getting worse. What
we witnessed is not Carmel.
9/18/2022 6:08:28 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

Miss Concours on the Avenue but liked Prancing
Ponies Yes It was okay. Yes Loved it. They were okay. Yes.

More interesting as
more to see
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/18/2022 8:34:58 A worker in 93921 Loved it.

I enjoy car culture and I get more hours at work
that week and it helps me out financially quite a
bit. Without events as large as Car Week I could
not afford to live in Monterey County No I was working. I see the events but I can only attend for a few minutes, like during my meal break No Loved it. Loved them.

Because they bring
good economic
activity to our
community and the
revenues and taxes
generated create jobs
and taxes and those
tax dollars go to pay
for services that all
residents, workers and
visitors benefit from. Yes.

The Concours on the
Avenue was my
absolute favorite
event. It was easy to
attend and so
interesting with all of
the beautiful cars on
display
They helped with traffic and
safety.

I support ALL of the Car Week activities but I
do not support lawbreakers. I would like to
see a zero tolerance policy from CPD towards
speeders and other bad actors. If they are not
stopped forcefully, they will ruin this wonderful
event and we will lose it forever.
9/18/2022 10:33:32 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Missed Concourse line up on ocean and the
display of cars Yes It was okay. Yes It was okay. They were okay. Missed old events Yes.

Makes car week a
stupendous event
They helped with traffic and
safety. Safety to residents is important
9/18/2022 11:44:35 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

No Concours on the Avenue. And no Tour
D'Elegance lunch stop. We live in Carmel
(93923) No No Totally under whelmed. They were okay. Yes.

They are the best
events Carmel has to
offer.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/18/2022 12:14:52 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay. Not enough interesting events in the village No Yes It was okay. They were okay.

There wasn't much of
interest going on...and
nothing compares to
the Concours on the
Avenue event! Yes.

The Concours on the
Avenue always
showcases an
amazing selection of
vehicles and it's fun to
speak with the
owners. Listening to
the personal stories
(interviews by 2
experts with car
owners by the library)
is a highlight of the
day. This is our
favorite event. The
tour on Wednesday is
also fun to attend, due
to the variety of
vehicles all in one
place.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

No racing from block to block stop signs,
revving of engines, i.e., noise, etc.
9/18/2022 12:16:58 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 I just submitted my form but wanted to add a
note that you should include the 93923 zip code
along with 93921.
9/18/2022 14:15:44 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

I missed Concours on the Avenue, but enjoyed
everything else. Yes It was okay. Yes Loved it. Loved them.

Love the car events at
no cost Yes.

They are interesting
and exciting
Living right downtown, I walk to
everything and was not
inconvenienced by traffic except
on the Highway. See above
9/18/2022 14:33:21 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay.

I wish there had been more events like there
have been in the past but prancing ponies did a
great event No Yes Loved it. Wished there could’ve been more events Yes.

Because they were
exciting and fun
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/18/2022 15:37:55 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

It was an opportunity to see some remarkable
cars. There was an air of excitement that was
fun. No Yes Loved it. Loved them.

Carmel is a charming
community. We have
been renting a
vacation rental for a
month or two every
year for 25 years. The
people are friendly
and the restaurants
are great. We are
golfers and appreciate
the beauty of the
courses. All the events
we have attended in
the past have been
enjoyable. Yes.

This was our first car
show, so we have
never experienced
those events and
would like to.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

We never experienced any issues or
inconvenience
9/18/2022 17:30:01 A resident of 93921 Loved it.

Great cars, no major issues, money to the
city/business Yes Loved it. Yes Loved it. Loved them.

They bring something
to Carmel Yes.

An event to do
something for the day
They helped with traffic and
safety.

Slowed down traffic and prevented reckless
drivers
9/18/2022 18:36:41 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Even though the event says it brings in millions
to charity, I never see what charities. It must cost
a mint and a half to put up the massive tents,
etc. Three weeks to set up/two weeks to take
down. Semi trucks everywhere. Speeding here
and in PB day and night. Noise … OMG, it’s
such a juxtaposition from what we are used to
here. Even if cars are gunning it on Ocean, you
can hear for miles. I wish everyone could be
shuttled in. That might not help Carmel b/c if they
shuttle in to PB events, maybe more would come
to Carmel. ??? Not sure. I had one couple in a
convertible tell me to get out of the road and
drove right at me while I was walking. I was on
the side of the road - like we all walk and have
forever. It just seems like too much, too
excessive and too disruptive to those of us who
live here, pay taxes here, shop here and support
here. Even if it’s just a week. We’ve come to call
it Hell Week vs Car Week. No NA No NA I did not like them at all.

It’s just nothing we are
that interested in -
cars/crowds. No
See all the previous
Why answers.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/19/2022 14:28:44 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 I did not like it at all.

Prancing Ponies has never interested me, nor
Acura. Concours on the Avenue has always
been a huge draw as was the Pebble Beach
Tour d’Elegance. Hopefully the City of Carmel
will make an effort to bring them back. Yes I did not like it at all. No I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all. Yes.

They were exciting
events.

They helped with traffic and
safety.

It’s nice to be able to walk down Ocean
Avenue and not wonder if you are going to be
hit by crazy car drivers.
9/19/2022 15:48:12 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

I miss Concourse on the Avenue. Miss the PB
drive through Carmel/lunch for drivers. No What event in the Park?Yes Loved it. Missed previous years (2019) downtown events Love the cars, love
that I can walk to the
event, dont have to
leave town. Love the
atmosphere it creates
downtown. Yes. See above
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Very concerned about police officers safety.

Still had issues in the evenings, despite no
large events during the day. Any measures to
make it easier for the officers to manage the
later evening trouble makers would be
welcome.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/19/2022 15:49:00 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

The cars were out of control, it was dangerous to
cross the street downtown, way too much traffic
out of town. If you lived in town it didn't allow you
to do your usual errands. No Yes It was okay. I did not like them at all.

Nothing seemed worth
viewing. It felt like
there was no effort put
into the events for the
community. Yes.

It actually gives the
local community
something to
participate in and
makes you hate the
overall week less.

They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.
9/19/2022 16:33:47 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 I did not like it at all.

Missed Concours on the Avenue. One of few
free events for locals. Plus businesses count on
this income. No Attended in 2021. Boring. No Uninterested I did not like them at all.Boring ABSOLUTELY!!! Fun, entertaining,
educational, engaging
Carmel did their best. In future
bring in additional help
Too many rude people coming from out of
area
9/19/2022 17:39:19 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it. It’s fun and brings a lot of benefit to our economy No Didn’t attend No Didn’t attend Loved them. Fun Yes. Economic benefits They helped with traffic and
safety. No issues
9/19/2022 17:42:30 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 Loved it.

As a local peninsula resident, it was great to see
businesses thriving. It’s also fun to see all the
cars. No No Wish there were more.

Seems like someone
canceled this year Yes.

I think it shows off our
town, and brings
revenue to our
businesses and
workers. This money
helps pay for things
for residents in the
long run.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Cars were deterred from Ocean Avenue,
which was great after a certain hour. I like
having the ability to see them, drive up and
down during the day though.
9/19/2022 17:48:50 I did not like it at all.

Too many people, frightening to drive locally,
people driving 65 in 25mph zones No Yes I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all. No Too many people, no
parking, dangerous for
police and firefighters
to get to help those in
need
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat. there's still too many people
9/19/2022 19:16:43 A restauranteur in 93921I did not like it at all.

Missed Concours on the Avenue and the
Prancing Ponies was just horrible, a complete
embarrassment, not the upscale type of event
we are use to. Also, this event being held on
Thursday messed up the Concours cars coming
through Carmel like they usually do. All in all, it
felt like a bad year for Carmel relative to Car
Week so I hope it improves next year. Martin and
I are happy to donate time to help now that Doug
is gone. Yes I did not like it at all. Yes I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all.

A big let down
compared to prior
years Yes.

They are part of our
culture and are so
much fun! They tie
Carmel to Car Week
and are upscale
events showcasing
amazing cars. Half the
cars at Prancing
ponies were not
woman owned and
many were rental
cars.

Overkill! Let’s enjoy one week a
year if fun cars zipping around
and showing off. Too much
policing, feels like a retirement
community has taken over.
9/19/2022 19:25:31 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay. Really missed concourse on the avenue! No No They were okay. Yes.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/19/2022 20:55:09 A Car Week attendee from outside of the 93921 It was okay. Love the events but not the show off drivers No What event in the Park?No What event on Ocean Avenue? They were okay. Yes.

They were a family
friendly fun event.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

I heard a lot of racing though carmel, pebble
and pg. didn’t feel safe going on walks or
taking kids out.
9/20/2022 8:00:35 A resident of 93921, A worker in 93921 Loved it. Less crowds No Neutral No It was okay. They were okay. Neutral They mostly
inconvenience
residents and those
attendees are not
spending at local
businesses Slight improvement.

STILL lots of racing on resident streets for
hours and police never showed up! Everyone
thought someone else would call authorities.

It was insane!
9/20/2022 9:30:23 A resident of 93921 It was okay. Missed COTA. Best part. Yes I did not like it at all. Yes I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all.Unengaging Yes.

Best excitement.

FREE. Fun.

Educational.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Police/City did their best. Guests always find a
way around safety measures.
9/20/2022 9:33:53 A worker in 93921 I did not like it at all. Slow. Business declined. Yes I did not like it at all. Yes I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all.Dull Yes.

It’s the best event in
Carmel for all
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/20/2022 11:00:47 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Too much traffic, too many really terrible drivers,
too many people in general. Too much violation
of driving laws. No I did not like it at all. No I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all.see comments above No They did not help with traffic and
safety at all.

Idiot drivers racing up and down Ocean Ave.

Grand standing.
9/20/2022 11:45:01 An innkeeper in 93921 It was okay.

Missed Concourse on the Ave which made a lot
of our guests come in later than we usually do
which lead to lost revenue. Parking was better
though! No Yes Loved it. They were okay. Yes. It's fun for everyone! They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/20/2022 11:45:18 A restauranteur in 93921It was okay. Not enough events in Carmel No It was okay. Yes Loved it. I wish there were more More events brings
more people. More
people means more
money spent in
Carmel Yes.

I know locals do not
like car week but it
brings a lot of
business and money
for everyone that
works in Carmel
They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/20/2022 11:51:34 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

The Concour on the Avenue and Tour d'Concour
set the stage for world class events that during
car week that were managed extremely well.

This year was chaos. We went from Rolex and
Tiffany events in previous years to Walmart and
Target events this year. Yes Loved it. Yes I did not like it at all. I did not like them at all. Yes.

World class events
that were
professionally
executed
They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.

Attachment 1
Timestamp I am:

How did you feel
about Car Week in
Carmel-by-the-Sea
overall this year? Why do you feel that way?
Did you attend the
Acura in the Park
Event on Tuesday,
August 16?
How did you feel
about the Acura in the
Park event on
Tuesday, August 16?
Did you attend the
Prancing Ponies All
Woman Car Show on
Thursday, August 18
on Ocean Avenue?
How did you feel
about the Prancing
Ponies All Woman Car
Show on Thursday,
August 18 on Ocean
Avenue?
How do you feel about
the events in Carmelby-the-Sea in general
this year?
Why do you feel that
way?
Do you want to see
the larger events like
Concours on the
Avenue and/or Tour
d'Elegance return to
Carmel-by-the-Sea if it
is possible?
Why do you feel that
way?
How did you feel about the
effectiveness of traffic calming
measures in place for safety in the
City during Car Week - i.e.
shutting streets down in the
evenings, alternate routes around
Ocean Avenue, etc.? Why do you feel that way?
9/20/2022 11:51:40 An innkeeper in 93921 Loved it.

Its a very lively event and there is a great vibe all
week long Yes It was okay. Yes Loved it. Loved them.
it was great and
brought in lots of
people which is good
marketing and
revenue for Carmel Yes.

Definitely wish to bring
it back as some of my
guests stay at our
hotel so they can walk
to these events or sit
outside to see the tour
and they were very
disappointed that it did
it happen this year.

Then streets were
bare on some of these
days due to nothing
happening in Carmel.

They helped with traffic and
safety.
it was ok but it does deter some guests to
avoid coming in
9/20/2022 13:55:43 A restauranteur in 93921It was okay.

Business is not what it used to be 5 years ago
during that week. Yes It was okay. No They were okay. Yes.

They helped with traffic and safety
somewhat.
9/20/2022 14:55:30 A resident of 93921 It was okay.

Understand the reasons, but it wasn’t the same
without Concours on the Avenue and the Pebble
Cars on the Avenue. Prancing Ponies should
be relegated to the side streets they started on,
not front and center at Devendorf Park. Other
than that, I look forward to Car Week every year. No What event in the Park?No I did not like it at all. They were okay.

Missed Concours and
Pebble Cars Yes.

That’s the heart and
soul of the Carmel-bythe-Sea Car Week
experience .

They helped with traffic and
safety.
9/20/2022 16:48:11
It did bring a lot of visitors into our store.Those
putting on and judging the different events,
attendees of the events. There was joy and
happiness in the air.Even those visitors who
were in the area and didn’t know the event was
going on we’re excited when we talk to them Yes It was okay. Yes Loved it. Loved them.

Well, I’m a car fan! I
was very surprised
though of all the cars
and people up and
down Ocean Avenue
and the side streets
Thursday Friday and
Saturday night I think
that’s an unplanned
event and it was wow Yes. ☺ Didn’t notice
9/20/2022 17:09:47 A resident of 93921 I did not like it at all.

Tuesday and Thursday were canceled! That’s
terrible. Those were the days I looked most
forward to in Carmel, the days most special for
our city. Seeing the cars all week in town is nice,
but concours on the Avenue and the tour stop
are the best Yes It was okay. Yes does not have the interest of concours on the Avenue, and certainly not as interesting as the Tour d Elegance I like seeing the car is visiting, and interesting people, but Tuesday and Thursday being canceled is awful Concours on the
Avenue and the tour
de elegance are very
special events that put
Carmel on the map.

We should not take
these for granted. Yes.

These are world-class
events that contribute
to the special aspects
of our city!
may have actually been too much.

Don’t take out all the fun!
I do appreciate the work of the police officers.

They were very vigilant and brave. City
manager and mayor very smart and caring for
our city.

Attachment 1

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
November 1, 2022

ORDERS OF BUSINESS
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Alan Ward, Police Chief
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
SUBJECT:

Resolution 2022-096, adopting the 2022 Monterey County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2022-096, adopting the 2022 Monterey County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, Volumes 1 and 2.

BACKGROUND/SUMMARY:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the California Governors’ Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) have completed a preliminary review of the 2022 Monterey County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP). FEMA and Cal OES have given tentative approval of the plan, pending local adoption. The approval of the plan ensures the city of Carmel-by-the-Sea’s eligibility and prequalification for potential federal pre-and post-disaster funding. The plan includes hazard identification, risk and vulnerability assessments, and mitigation strategies to reduce vulnerability and risk from hazards and reduce the severity of the effects of hazards on people, property, and the environment.

DISCUSSION
Monterey County and Carmel-by-the-Sea are potentially vulnerable to a wide range of natural and manmade hazards. These hazards can threaten the life and safety of residents and visitors and have the potential to damage or destroy both public and private property and disrupt the local economy and overall quality of life. While the threats from hazard events may never be fully eliminated, there is much that can be done to lessen their potential impact. The purpose of hazard mitigation is to implement and sustain actions that reduce vulnerability and risk from hazards or reduce the severity of the effects of hazards on people, property, and the environment.

The Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA) of 2000 (Public Law 106-390) requires state and local government agencies to prepare comprehensive Hazard Mitigation Plans in order to be eligible to receive pre-and postdisaster mitigation funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The DMA also requires the Hazard Mitigation Plan to be monitored, evaluated, and updated within a five-year cycle to remain eligible for disaster related benefits under the DMA.

The 2022 Monterey County Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP) is a comprehensive update to the 2016 Monterey County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan and represents the third iteration of the Monterey County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, which was initially adopted in 2007. The planning area for the MJHMP encompasses the entire geographic area of Monterey County and includes the following participating jurisdictions: Monterey County, the cities of Carmel-by-the-Sea, Del Rey Oaks, Gonzales, Greenfield, King, Marina, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Salinas, Sand City, Seaside, and Soledad, as well as the Monterey County Water Resources Agency, the Carmel Area Wastewater District, Monterey One Water, the Monterey Regional Waste Management District, and the Moss Landing Harbor District.

The 2022 update to the MJHMP (attachment 2, “Volume 1”) was developed by the MJHMP Steering Committee, made up of participants from the County and participating jurisdictions. The Steering Committee served as an advisory body on hazard and mitigation action priorities both for the County as a whole and each jurisdiction individually, with Monterey County Office of Emergency Services as the planning lead. The Monterey County MJHMP:

Provides an explanation of prevalent hazards within the County and describes how hazards may affect the County and participating jurisdictions differently based upon various relationships to natural hazards.

Includes a discussion of hazard location, size of a typical event, historical occurrences, and the probability of future occurrences for each identified hazard.

Identifies risks to vulnerable assets, both people and property.

Provides a mitigation strategy that responds to the identified vulnerabilities within each community and provides prescriptions or actions to achieve the greatest risk reduction based upon available resources.

Pools resources from throughout the County and creates a uniform local hazard mitigation plan that can be consistently implemented.

Ensures eligibility for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Cal OES grants.

The Carmel-by-the-Sea Annex (attachment 3, “Volume 2”, pages 51-75) provides specific details on the City’s planning process, a City specific risk and vulnerability assessment, and a mitigation strategy that responds to the identified vulnerabilities within to achieve the greatest risk reduction based upon available resources.

The plan underwent review by the County and participating jurisdictions, the general public (review period occurred from December 2021 to March 2022) and received approval pending adoption from FEMA on June 14, 2022.

OTHER AGENCY INVOLVEMENT
The Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation revision process brought together representatives of involved stakeholder agencies and organizations who could have a role in mitigation planning and implementation of mitigation strategies as identified in the plan. Monterey County, the cities of Carmel-by-the-Sea, Del Rey Oaks, Gonzales, Greenfield, King, Marina, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Salinas, Sand City, Seaside, and Soledad, as well as the Monterey County Water Resources Agency, the Carmel Area Wastewater District, Monterey One Water, the Monterey Regional Waste Management District, and the Moss Landing Harbor District participated in the planning and completion of the plan.

Staff recommends that Council adopt Resolution 2022-096, adopting the 2022 Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation plan, Volume 1 and Volume 2.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact for the approval of the MJHMP. However, implementation of the MJHMP will require funding and staff resources. Future funding requests will come before this Board for consideration as part of the budget process or on a case by case basis.

PRIOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION:

There are no prior City Council actions in regard to this agenda item.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1) Resolution 2022-096
Attachment 2) MJHMP Volume 1
Attachment 3) MJHMP Volume 2-Carmel-by-the-Sea annex
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-096

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

CITY COUNCIL
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL –BY-THE-SEA ADOPTING THE 2022 MONTEREY COUNTYMULTI- JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea is vulnerable to natural hazards that may result in loss of life and property, economic hardship, and threats to the public health and safety; and WHEREAS, the City anticipates climate change will exacerbate the severity, frequency, and impacts of natural hazards; and
WHEREAS, pro-active mitigation of known hazards before a disaster event can reduce or eliminate long-term risk to life and property; and
WHEREAS, the federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires all cities, counties, and special districts to have adopted a Hazard Mitigation Plan to receive pre-and post-disaster mitigation funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); and WHEREAS, a coalition of Monterey County local governments and special districts embarked on a planning process to prepare for and lessen the impacts of specified hazards by updating the Monterey County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP), which is the blueprint for reducing the Operational Area's vulnerability to disasters and hazards; and WHEREAS, the update to the MJHMP has been prepared in accordance with federal laws, including the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended; Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, as amended; the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended; and the National Dam Safety Program Act, as amended; and WHEREAS, the MJHMP identifies mitigation goals and actions to reduce or eliminate longterm risk to people and property in the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea from the impacts of future hazards and disasters; and
WHEREAS, the MJHMP planning partnership and the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea have completed a coordinated planning process that engaged the public, assessed the risk and vulnerability to the impacts of natural hazards, developed a mitigation strategy consistent with a set of uniform goals and objectives, and created a plan for implementing, evaluating, and revising the strategy; and
WHEREAS, each jurisdiction has been responsible for the review and approval of their individual sections of the Plan and the Plan presents the accumulated information in a unified framework to ensure a comprehensive and coordinated hazard mitigation plan that covers the entire Monterey County Operational Area planning area that is aligned with the goals, objectives and priorities of the State's multi-hazard mitigation plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the CEQA Guidelines pursuant to the Provisions of Title 14 of the California Administrative Code, Section 15061(b)(3) (common sense exemption), and Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies); and WHEREAS, the result of the countywide organizational effort is a two volume Hazard Mitigation Plan, which will result in a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Attachment 1
Resolution No. 2022-096