Agenda packet — Carpinteria City Council, September 14, 2026 (part 3 of 4)

EXHIBIT “A”

LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

PARCEL A
Lot 1 in Block B of the Town of Carpinteria, in the City of Carpinteria, County of Santa Barbara, State of California, in the J.W. Dorrance Re-Subdivision of Blocks 31, 40, 45, 56 and portions of Blocks 46 and 55, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 9 of Maps and Surveys, at

Page 95 ends

Together with the north half of Lot 5 in Block B of the Town of Carpinteria, in the City of Carpinteria, County of Santa Barbara, State of California, in the J.W. Dorrance Re-Subdivision of Blocks 31, 40, 45, 56 and portions of Blocks 46 and 55, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 9 of Maps and Surveys, at Page 95, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County.

PARCEL B
Lot 2 in Block B of the Town of Carpinteria, in the City of Carpinteria, County of Santa Barbara, State of California, in the J.W. Dorrance Re-Subdivision of Blocks 31, 40, 45, 56 and portions of Blocks 46 and 55, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 9 of Maps and Surveys, at

Page 95 ends

Together with the south half of Lot 5 in Block B of the Town of Carpinteria, in the City of Carpinteria, County of Santa Barbara, State of California, in the J.W. Dorrance Re-Subdivision of Blocks 31, 40, 45, 56 and portions of Blocks 46 and 55, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 9 of Maps and Surveys, at Page 95, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County.

Prepared on September 1, 2025 by:

Jeremy Henry PLS 8135
Henry Land Surveying
805-216-6124
[email protected]

Page 272 of 523 ends

IA N R OF
I
OF
C
A
L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D
A
R
E

SNECI L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
C1.0

GRADING COVER
SHEET

REVISION
© 2025 DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. THE DESIGN IDEAS

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -ARB PRELIMENARY APPROVAL 11-13-2025

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER

CITY OF CARPINTERIA
PLN2022-2232
333 LINDEN AVENUE
192
101

LEGEND/SYMBOLS

EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR

EXISTING INTERVAL CONTOUR

CONSTRUCTION CENTERLINE

EXISTING GAS LINE

EXISTING WATER LINE

EXISTING SEWER LINE

EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE

EXISTING COMMINICATIONS

SAWCUT LINE

FIRE HYDRANT

WATER METER

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

SEWER MANHOLE

MANHOLE

CABLE TV PULLBOX

COMMUNICATION PULLBOX

ELECTRICAL PULLBOX

STREET LIGHT PULLBOX

ABBREVIATIONS

AB AGGREGATE BASE
AC
AS

ASPHALT CONCRETE

AGGREGATE SUBBASE

APPROX APPROXIMATE
ARHM
BC
BCR
BLDG
BVC
BW
CB
CF
C&G
CL
CLF
COMM
CONC
CP
DI
EC
ECR
ELEC
EMH
EP
EVC
EX
FG
FH
FL
FS
GB
GM
GV
HP

ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX

BEGIN CURVE

BEGIN CURB RETURN

BUILDING

BEGIN VERTICAL CURVE

BOTTOM OF WALL OR

BACK OF WALK

CATCH BASIN

CURB FACE

CURB AND GUTTER

CENTERLINE

CHAIN LINK FENCE

COMMUNICATIONS

CONCRETE

CONTROL POINT

DROP INLET

END CURVE

END CURB RETURN

ELECTRIC

ELECTRIC MANHOLE

EDGE OF PAVEMENT

END VERTICAL CURVE

EXISTING

FINISH GRADE

FIRE HYDRANT

FLOWLINE

FINISHED SURFACE

GRADE BREAK

GAS METER

GAS VALVE

HIGH POINT
192
Project
Site

PACIFIC OCEAN
150

LOCATION MAP

41.86 FS
C-1
101
ICV
INV
IRR
LP
MB
NPDES
OHW
PB
PCC
P/L
PMB
PRC
RCB
RCP
RD
SCO
SD
SDMH
SMH
SMW
ST
SW
TC
TEL
TG
TMH
TS
TYP
VLT
VLV
WM
WV

IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE
INVERT

IRRIGATION

LOW POINT

MAIL BOX

NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE

ELIMINATION SYSTEM

OVERHEAD WIRE

PULL BOX

POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE

PROPERTY LINE
PROCESSED MISC. BASE

POINT OF RETURN CURVE

REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX

REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
ROAD
R.O.W. RIGHT OF WAY

R/W RIGHT OF WAY

SEWER CLEAN OUT

STORM DRAIN

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

SEWER MANHOLE

SURVEY MONUMENT WELL
STREET

SIDEWALK

TOP OF CURB

TELEPHONE

TOP OF GRATE

TELEPHONE MANHOLE

TRAFFIC SIGNAL

TYPICAL
VAULT
VALVE

WATER METER

WATER VALVE

CITY OF CARPINTERIA
APPROVED BY:

PROJECT NO.

SHEET1 OF

PLAN DATE

SHEET INDEX

1. TITLE SHEET

2. EC-1
EC-2

FINE GRADING PLAN

EROSION CONTROL PLAN

EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
101

5. DUST CONTROL SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE CAUSED BY DUST FROM CONSTRUCTION.

6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH NPDES REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR

SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION.

7. STAGING AND STORAGE OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. NO MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.

8. ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM TO CARPINTERIA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 8.36, THESE PLANS, AND AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
192

GENERAL NOTES

1. ALL WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE

WITH THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION LATEST

EDITION, SUPPLEMENTS, AND ERRATA THERETO, WRITTEN AND PROMULGATED BY PUBLIC WORKS STANDARDS, INC., AND ADDITIONS AND AMENDMENTS BY THE CITY OF CARPINTERIA.

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AND SHALL

REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.

3. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT THE SURVEY CONTROL AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. IF THE SURVEY CONTROL IS DESTROYED OR DISTURBED

DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR RESETTING THEM AND

FILE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS WITH THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER.

4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROPERTY INSOFAR AS BE AFFECTED BY THESE OPERATIONS. 10615.000 2

PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR / CITY ENGINEER DATE
DISPOSAL SITE ________________
IMPORT: ________________CU. YDS SOURCE ____________________ REMOVAL & RECOMPACTION: ___________________ CU. YDS AVERAGE NATURAL SLOPE IN THE AREA OF GRADING _________________

PROPOSED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES
09-11-2023
APN: 003-440-028
FILE NO:

CITY OF CARPINTERIA
333 LINDEN AVE

GRADING COVER SHEET

VICINITY MAP

PROJECT

CARPINTERIA
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

APN 003-440-028
Lot 2 in Block B of the Town of Carpinteria, in the City of Carpinteria, County of Santa Barbara, State of California, in the J.W. Dorrance Re-Subdivision of Blocks 31, 40, 45, 56 and portions of Blocks 46 and 55, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 9 of Maps and Surveys, at Page 95, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County.

APN 003-440-027
Lot 1 and Lot 5 in Block B of the Town of Carpinteria, in the City of Carpinteria, County of Santa Barbara, State of California, in the J.W. Dorrance Re-Subdivision of Blocks 31, 40, 45, 56 and portions of Blocks 46 and 55, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 9 of Maps and Surveys, at Page 95, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County.

APN 003-440-026
Lot 6 in Block B of the Town of Carpinteria, in the City of Carpinteria, County of Santa Barbara, State of California, in the J.W. Dorrance Re-Subdivision of Blocks 31, 40, 45, 56 and portions of Blocks 46 and 55, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 9 of Maps and Surveys, at Page 95, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County.

APN 003-440-010
Lot 4 in Block "H" of the J.W. Dorrance Subdivision of Blocks 31, 40, 45, 56 and portions of Blocks 46 and 55, in the Town of Carpinteria, in the City of Carpinteria, County of Santa Barbara, State of California, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 9, Page 95 of Maps and Surveys, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. 0 67
667

Page 273 of 523 ends

PROPERTY LINE

SETBACK
G
E

GAS LINE
ELEC. LINE

S SEWER LINE

W WATER LINE

BF BACKFLOW PREVENTER
Minimum 5% slope for a minimum of 10' away from strucutre (2% if surface is impervious) or to approved drainage system.

SBCO Grading Ordinance #4766
4" STORM DRAIN
CB 9" SQUARE STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN
LEGEND
E
IA

N R OFI

OF CA L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D A R
ESNECI
L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
C2.0

FINE GRADING
PLAN

REVISION
© 2025 DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. THE DESIGN IDEAS

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -ARB PRELIMENARY APPROVAL 11-13-2025

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232
NORTH

FF THRESHOLD
35 15.22 FF WOOD LANDING
36 15.03
P
54 P
PP
55 PALM 12"
56 PALM 24"
66 12.63
WM
67 12.45
TC
68 12.28
FL
69 11.78
PALM 24"
70 11.94
SIG
71 N

11.82 WM
72 11.55
LIGH
73 T

11.31 TC
74 11.33
FL
75 10.79

FF THRESHOLD

BLDG COR
80 TREE /30"
81 PALM 10"
82 12.52

BLDG COR
100 22.3ft

25.3ft

22.7ft

22.9ft

20.7ft

24.0ft

18.5ft

18.8ft

18.5ft

19.4ft

19.7ft

23.0ft

24.1ft

23.6ft

22.7ft

22.6ft

20.2ft

20.0ft

20.6ft

19.9ft

17.8ft

17.7ft

19.4ft

17.5ft

15.4ft

20.2ft

20.7ft

20.6ft

20.9ft

21.1ft

21.0ft

21.3ft

21.8ft

28.2ft

31.4ft

31.7ft

32.6ft

32.4ft

21.8ft

20.0ft

20.4ft
1326

11.00 1328

25.24 1329

13.00 1330

13.17 1461

13.00 1474

13.14 1487

13.36 1488

13.71 1489

13.67 1490

13.32 1504

13.70 1505

13.61 1506

13.37 1507

13.24 1519

12.9 1
5 520

13.16 1521

13.35 1522

13.46 1523

13.70 1524

13.08 1525

13.15 1526

13.14 1537

12.30 1538

12.61 1539

13.07 1540

13.36 1541

13.48 1542

13.51 1543

13.14 1544

13.12 1559

11.77 1560

12.24 1561

12.47 1562

13.06 1563

13.26 1564

13.21 1581

11.68 1582

11.77 13.33
1618

12.67 1619

12.88 1620

13.39 1640

11.35 1641

11.47 1662

11.03 1663

11.16 1682

11.35 1683

11.49 1684

11.93 1685

12.02 1756

11.76 1757

11.72 1823

11.62 1824

11.67 1825

12.17 1843

12.11 1844

11.83 1845

12.69 1868

12.21 Building
Building
Building
Building
FF 15.08'
FF 14.63'
FF 14.61'
FF 15.01'
FF 15.22'
Si
d
e
w
alk
C
u
r
b & G
u
t
t
e
r
Si
d
e
wal
k
Light
Light
12" Palm
10" Palm
24" Palm
24" Palm
Powerpole
Powerpole
30" Tree
Water
Water
F
e
n
c
e
Fence
F
e
n
c
e
Fence
A
p
p
r
o
x
F
e
n
c
e
Wall
D
Wood Deck
e
c
k
Deck
2033

11.93 13.00

12.00 12.00
11 0. 0

12.00 N45\U+00B0 00' 00"E

45.00'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"E

45.00'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
157.50'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
157.50'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W N45\U+00B0 00' 00"E 45.00' LOT 1
L

45.00'
OT 2
WM
GM

13.00 FF

13.00 FG

12.00 FG

11.50 FG

12.80 GF

13.00 FF

12.70 FS

12.80 GF

12.00 FS

12.20 FS

12.85 FS

12.55 FS
CB
4 4
1 5
2 12.90 FS

12.90 FS

12.80 FS

12.00 FS

12.40 FS

12.00 FG

12.00 FG
CB CB
CB
CB

12.45 FG

12.25 FG
1 2
2 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 12.90 FS

13.71 FG

13.61 FG
15 1 1
16 16
16 16
CB

DISH TRASH
5 10 10 8 10 10 11
5 1
1 1
3 3 3
12 1

REF WINE
COND
W/D
COND
WH
feet 0 4 8

FINE GRADING PLAN
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" 1
PERMEABLE PAVER: ANGELUS PERMEABLE COURTYARD
PAVERS, SAND-STONE-MOCHA. ASHLAR PATTERN.

COORDINATE ON SITE IN CRZ OF SYCAMORE TREE.

GRADING KEY NOTES
1 2
3 4
SITE WALL: CONSTRUCT SLUGH WALL PER DETAIL. #1
DRIVEWAY APPROACH: INSTALL 6" PCC DRIVEWAY
APPROACH W/ #4 @ 18" O.C. EACH WAY OVER 2' OF

REMOVAL AND RECOMPACTION
5 6
7 8 (E) 30" SYCAMORE TREE TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE:

SEE ARBORIST REPORT
9 (E) PALM TREE TO BE REMOVED:
10 (E) WATER METER: 3/4" WATER METER, 1 1/2" MAIN.

WATR METER SIZE IS TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY
FIRE DEPARTMENT.
11 (P) GAS METER: 1 1/2" MAIN LINE TO BUILDING
12 (P) N200 AMP PANEL:WORKING CLEARANCE: PROVIDE
30" WIDE X 36" DEEP WORKING CLEARANCES AT
PANELS. CEC SEC. 110.26 (A)(1). PROVIDE 6'-6" HEAD
ROOM AT SERVICE PANEL. CEC 110.26 (2) & (3).
(P) FIRE SPRINKLER RISER
13 SITE DRAIN: 4" DIA. SCHEDULE 40 PVC DRAINLINE (S=.5% MIN) DRAIN OUTLET: INSTALL 4" PVC WYE, 2-3"X4" REDUCERS,
2-3" DIA. SCHEDULE 80 PVC SIDEWALK DRAINS
LANDING: PER ARCH PLANS
NO PARKING SIGN: REMOVE AND REPLACE "NO
PARKING" SIGN.
(P)EXCAVATION: LIMITS OF REMOVAL AND
RECOMPACTION FOR STRUCTURE, 5 FEET OUTSIDE
STRUCTURE AND 3 FEET BELOW FOOTING.
14 TREE PROTECTION FENCING: SEE TPP AND ARBORIST
REPORT
15 16 FLAGSTONE: ON CONCRETE PAD

Page 274 of 523 ends

E
IA

N R OFI

OF CA L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D A R
ESNECI
L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
C3.0

EROSION

CONTROL PLAN

REVISION
© 2025 DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. THE DESIGN IDEAS

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -ARB PRELIMENARY APPROVAL 11-13-2025

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232
feet 0 8 16

EROSION CONTROL PLAN
4 SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 1
NORTH APN: 003-440-029
LINDEN AVENUE LOT 2 APN: 003-440-027 APN: 003-440-027
Sidewalk
Curb & Gutter
Sidewalk
Light
12" Palm
24" Palm
24" Palm
Powerpole
Water
Water Fence
Fence Fence
Wall Wood Deck
Deck
NORTH

PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR / CITY ENGINEER DATE

CITY OF CARPINTERIA
APPROVED BY: CITY OF CARPINTERIA

EROSION CONTROL PLAN
PROJECT NO.

SHEET
EC-1 OF

PLAN DATE
10615.000
2 333 LINDEN AVENUE

LINDEN AVENUE
APN: 003-440-028
LOT 2
11-20-2023

FF THRESHOLD
35 15.22 FF WOOD LANDING
36 15.03
PP
54 PP
55 PALM 12"
56 PALM 24"
66 12.63
WM
67 12.45
TC
68 12.28
FL
69 11.78
PALM 24"
70 11.94
SIG
7 N
1 11.82
WM
72 11.55
LIGH
73 T

11.31 TC
74 11.33
FL
75 10.79

FF THRESHOLD

BLDG COR
80 TREE /30"
81 PALM 10"
82 12.52

22.9ft

20.7ft

18.5ft

18.8ft

18.5ft

19.4ft

19.7ft

23.0ft

24.1ft

23.6ft

22.7ft

22.6ft

20.2ft

20.0ft

20.6ft

19.9ft

17.8ft

17.7ft

19.4ft

17.5ft

15.4ft

20.2ft

20.7ft

20.6ft

20.9ft

21.1ft

21.0ft

21.3ft

21.8ft

28.2ft

31.4ft

31.7ft

32.6ft

32.4ft

20.0ft

20.0ft
1326

11.00 1328

25.24 1329

13.00 1330

13.17 1461

13.00 1474

13.14 1487

13.36 1488

13.71 1489

13.67 1504

13.70 1505

13.61 1506

13.37 1519

12.9 1
5 520

13.16 1521

13.35 1522

13.46 1523

13.70 1524

13.08 1525

13.15 1537

12.30 1538

12.61 1539

13.07 1540

13.36 1541

13.48 1542

13.51 1543

13.14 1559

11.77 1560

12.24 1561

12.47 1562

13.06 1563

13.26 1564

13.21 1581

11.68 1582

11.77 1618

12.67 1619

12.88 1620

13.39 1640

11.35 1641

11.47 1662

11.03 1663

11.16 1682

11.35 1683

11.49 1684

11.93 1685

12.02 1756

11.76 1757

11.72 1823

11.62 1824

11.67 1825

12.17 1843

12.11 1844

11.83 1845

12.69 1868

12.21 Building
Building
Building
Building
FF 15.08'
FF 14.63'
FF 14.61'
FF 15.01'
FF 15.22'
Sid
e
wal
k
C
u
r
b & G
u
t
t
e
r
Si
d
e
w
alk
Light
Light
12" Palm
10" Palm
24" Palm
24" Palm
Powerpole
Powerpole
30" Tree
Water
Water
F
e
n
c
e
Fence
F
e
n
c
e
Fence
A
p
p
r
o
x
F
e
n
c
e
W
all
D
Wood Deck
e
c
k
Deck
2033

11.93 13.00

12.00 12.00
11 0. 0

12.00 N45\U+00B0 00' 00"E

45.00'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"E

45.00'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
157.50'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
157.50'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"E

45.00'
LOT 1
LOT 2

45.00'
WM

CB CB CB GM
CB
CB

CONSTRUCTION

STAGING AREA

CONCRETE

WASHOUT
SEE DETAIL 2
sand weight
straw bale
(2) 2x2 wood stakes, 8"
from ends
visqueen
flat subgrade
maximum fill
feet 0 8 16

CONCRETE WASHOUT
4 SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 2

Page 275 of 523 ends

E
IA

N R OFI

OF CA L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D A R
ESNECI
L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
C4.0

EROSION

CONTROL

DETAILS

REVISION
© 2025 DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. THE DESIGN IDEAS

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -ARB PRELIMENARY APPROVAL 11-13-2025

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232

PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR / CITY ENGINEER DATE

CITY OF CARPINTERIA
APPROVED BY: CITY OF CARPINTERIA

EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
PROJECT NO.

SHEET
EC-2 OF

PLAN DATE
10615.000
2 333 LINDEN AVENUE
11-20-2023

Page 276 of 523 ends

E
IA

N R OFI

OF CA L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D A R
ESNECI
L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
A1.0

SITE PLAN

REVISION
© 2025 DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. THE DESIGN IDEAS

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -ARB PRELIMENARY APPROVAL 11-13-2025

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232
NORTH

FF THRESHOLD
35 15.22 FF WOOD LANDING
36 15.03
PP
54 PP
55 PALM 12"
56 PALM 24"
66 12.63
WM
67 12.45
TC
68 12.28
FL
69 11.78
PALM 24"
70 11.94
SIG
7 N
1 11.82
WM
72 11.55
LIGH
73 T

11.31 TC
74 11.33
FL
75 10.79

FF THRESHOLD

BLDG COR
80 TREE /30"
81 PALM 10"
82 12.52

BLDG COR
100

22.3ft

22.7ft

22.9ft

20.7ft

24.0ft

18.5ft

18.8ft

18.5ft

19.4ft

19.7ft

23.0ft

24.1ft

23.6ft

22.7ft

22.6ft

20.2ft

20.0ft

20.6ft

19.9ft

17.8ft

17.7ft

19.4ft

17.5ft

15.4ft

20.2ft

20.7ft

20.6ft

20.9ft

21.1ft

21.0ft

21.3ft

21.8ft

28.2ft

31.4ft

31.7ft

32.6ft

32.4ft

21.8ft

20.0ft

20.0ft
1326

11.00 1328

25.24 1329

13.00 1330

13.17 1461

13.00 1474

13.14 1487

13.36 1488

13.71 1489

13.67 1490

13.32 1504

13.70 1505

13.61 1506

13.37 1507

13.24 1519

12.9 1
5 520

13.16 1521

13.35 1522

13.46 1523

13.70 1524

13.08 1525

13.15 1526

13.14 1537

12.30 1538

12.61 1539

13.07 1540

13.36 1541

13.48 1542

13.51 1543

13.14 1544

13.12 1559

11.77 1560

12.24 1561

12.47 1562

13.06 1563

13.26 1564

13.21 1581

11.68 1582

11.77 13.33
1618

12.67 1619

12.88 1620

13.39 1640

11.35 1641

11.47 1662

11.03 1663

11.16 1682

11.35 1683

11.49 1684

11.93 1685

12.02 1756

11.76 1757

11.72 1823

11.62 1824

11.67 1825

12.17 1843

12.11 1844

11.83 1845

12.69 1868

11.93 13.00

12.00 12.00
11 0. 0

12.00 N45\U+00B0 00' 00"E

45.00'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"E

45.00'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
157.50'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
157.50'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W N45\U+00B0 00' 00"E 45.00' LOT 1
LOT 2

45.00'
WM
1 GM
6 3
3 7
4 4
8 2
1 4
4 4
9 1

DYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYH

DYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYH
1 DYH DYH DYH DYH DYH
16 16
16 16
16 16
16 2
2 2
16 4 17
6 6

DISH TRASH

KINGKING
5 10 10 8 10 10 11
5 1
1 1
3 3 3
12 1

REF WINE
COND
W/D
COND
WH
5'-0"
15' REAR SETBACK
LINDEN AVE.
16'-0"

LANDING
3'-0"
3'-0"
12'-0"
13'-9 1/2"
16'-3 1/2"
22'-2 3/4"
26'-8 3/4"
35'-0 1/4" 5'-0"
83'-8 1/2" 20'-0" 20' FRONT SETBACK
53'-7 1/8" 10'-2" 50'-2 3/4" 33'-5 3/4" 20'-0"
4'-11 3/4" 27'-10 1/4" 12'-2" 4'-11 3/4"

DRIVEWAY
(P) FOOTPRINT
1 6
3 3
7 4
4 4
8 6
3 2
1 1
4 4
4 4 4
2 9
10 11
13 12
14 14
2 17
1 16
16 16
16 16
16 E
E
E
W W
W
W
W
W W

G G G G
G

SS SS SS SS
15 15'-0" 48'-9 1/2"
feet 0 8 16

SITE PLAN
4 SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 1
PERMEABLE PAVER: ANGELUS PERMEABLE COURTYARD
PAVERS, SAND-STONE-MOCHA. ASHLAR PATTERN

KEY NOTES
1 2
3 4
(E) SIDEWALK:
6' TALL WOODEN FENCE ON PROPERTY LINE: NATURAL
FINISH
5 6 STUCCO SITE WALL: 30" TALL SMOOTH STUCCO SITE

WALL TO MATCH HOUSE
7 (P) CURB CUT AND APRON:
8 (E) 30" SYCAMORE TREE TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE:

SEE ARBORIST REPORT
9 (E) PALM TREE TO BE REMOVED:
10 (E) WATER METER: 3/4" WATER METER, 1 1/2" MAIN.

WATR METER SIZE IS TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY
FIRE DEPARTMENT. (PROTECT IN PLACE)
11 (P) GAS METER: 1 1/2" MAIN LINE TO BUILDING
12 (P) N200 AMP PANEL:WORKING CLEARANCE: PROVIDE
30" WIDE X 36" DEEP WORKING CLEARANCES AT
PANELS. CEC SEC. 110.26 (A)(1). PROVIDE 6'-6" HEAD
ROOM AT SERVICE PANEL. CEC 110.26 (2) & (3).
(P) A/C COMPRESSOR: WITH DISCONNECT SWITCH

THAT IS REQUIRED WITHIN SIGHT OF AND NOT OVER
50 FT FROM AIR CONDITIONER PER CMC 903.2.7.
(P) FIRE SPRINKLER RISER
13 14
TREE PROTECTION FENCING: SEE TPP AND ARBORIST
REPORT
15 FLAGSTONE: ON CONCRETE PAD
16 3/8 " GRAVEL MULCH:
17 42" TALL WOODEN FENCE ON PROPERTY LINE: NATURAL
FINISH
0 ELECTRICAL SERVICE PANEL
N.T.S. 3
NEW LOCATION OF 200 AMP ELECTRIC SERVICE PANEL
PROVIDE BONDING & UFFER GROUND. S.C.E MSR # XXXXXXX

NEW MAIN SERVICE
200A 3P 120/240V
MAIN 200A

DISCONNECT
4" SCH 40
(SCH 80 SWEEPS &

RISERS)
U.G. TO S.C.E. VAULT
PROVIDE 1/4" POLY

ROPE INSIDE
NEW 200 AMP PANEL

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. ELECTRODE SHALL BE:

OF THE CONCRETE ENCASED TYPE.

LOCATED IN THE BOTTOM THREE (3) INCHES OF THE FOOTING.

NOT LESS THAN TWENTY (20) FEET IN LENGTH.
250.66, BUT NOT SMALLER THAN NO. 4 A.W.G.

PANEL LOCATION NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH EDISON CO

GROUNDING SHALL BE REQUIRED AND THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE GROUNDING

BARE COPPER CONDUCTOR, SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CODE, TABLE 0 METER ASSEMBLY SEPARATION
N.T.S. 5

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. SIZE AND DIMENSIONS OF PANELS WILL VARY. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO SCALE.

THIS DRAWING PERTAINS TO BOTH OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND
ELECTRIC SERVICE APPLICATIONS.

MAINTAIN A 3-FOOT CLEAR, LEVEL, AND UNOBSTRUCTED
WORKSPACE IN FRONT OF ELECTRIC SERVICE EQUIPMENT.

PLUMBING FIXTURES THAT EXTEND MORE THAN 6 INCHES OUT FROM WALL SURFACE MUST BE LOCATED 18-INCHES MINIMUM FROM THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF THE METER PANEL.

FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION ONLY, DOES NOT APPLY FOR UPGRADES. 6'-3" MAX.\X4'-0" MIN. 27/64" 7/32"
METER
PANEL
CATV
TELCO
TYP.

GAS
METER

PLUMBING FIXTURE
FINAL

1. GRADE

2. THE HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE METER TO THE NEAREST SIDE WALL OR OTHER OBSTRUCTION SHALL BE 10 INCHES MINIMUM.

A HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE FROM THE EDGE OF THE METER PANEL TO THE

EDGE OF A WINDOW OR DOORWAY (INCLUDING SLIDING GLASS DOORS) SHALL BE 10 INCHES MINIMUM. A GAS METER OR PLUMBING FIXTURE THAT DOES NOT PROTRUDE MORE THAN 6 INCHES OUT FROM THE WALL, OR EXTEND LESS THAN 18 INCHES HORIZONTALLY FROM THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF THE METER PANEL, SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED AN OBSTRUCTION.

A LEVEL WORKING AND STANDING SURFACE, CLEAR AND UNOBSTRUCTED, ENTIRELY ON THE PROPERTY OF THE CUSTOMER, SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF THE WORKSPACE SHALL BE 36 INCHES OVERALL, BUT NEED NOT BE CENTERED BENEATH THE METER. THE MINIMUM DEPTH OF THE WORKSPACE SHALL BE 36 INCHES. WHERE METERS ARE ENCLOSED IN A

CLOSET OR RECESSED IN AN ENCLOSURE, THE DEPTH OF THE WORKSPACE IS MEASURED FROM THE OUTER FACE OF THE CLOSET OR RECESS. THE MINIMUM HEIGHT OF THE WORKSPACE SHALL BE 78 INCHES.

LEVEL WORKING AND

STANDING SPACE
10" MIN
36" MIN.
36" MIN.
78" MIN.
6'-3" MAX.\X4'-0" MIN.

CL
10" MIN
OTHER

OBSTRUCTION
SIDE
WALL
0 ELECTRICAL METER INSTALL
N.T.S. 4

EROSION CONTROL AND BMP NOTES
Owner:

PETER COOLER
4934 DORRANCE WAY
CARPINTERIA, CA 93013
It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to maintain control of the entire construction operations and to keep the entire site in compliance with the soil Erosion Control Plan.

Detailed Erosion Control Plan preparer:

Dylan Chappell
Dylan Chappell Architects
389 PINECREST AVE. P.O. BOX 8291
MAMMOTH LAKES, CA 93546
805.205.4760
• This Plan is intended for use for interim erosion and sediment control only and is not to be used for final elevations or permanent improvements. • The Contractor shall be responsible for monitoring erosion and sediment control measures prior, during, and after storm events. Monitoring includes maintaining a file documenting on-site inspections, problems encountered, corrective actions, and notes and a redline map of remedial implementation measures. • Reasonable care shall be taken when hauling any earth, sand, gravel, stone, debris or any hazardous substance over any public street, alley or other public place. Should any blow, spill, or track over and upon said public or adjacent private property, immediate clean up shall occur.
• Construction entrances shall be installed prior to commencement of grading. All construction traffic entering onto the paved roads must cross the stabilized construction
entranceway.
• Sanitary facilities shall be maintained on-site as appropriate. • During the rainy season, all paved areas shall be kept clear of earth material and debris. All earth stockpiles over 2.0 CY shall be covered by a tarp and ringed with straw bales or silt fencing. The site shall be maintained so as to minimize sediment-laden runoff to any storm drainage system including existing drainage swales and water courses.
• Construction operations shall be carried out in such a manner that erosion and water pollution will be minimized. State and local laws concerning pollution abatement shall be complied with.
• The facilities shown on this plan are designed to control erosion and sediment during the rainy season, November 1 to April 15. Facilities are to be operable prior to October
15 of any year.
• Grading operations during the rainy season which leave denuded slopes shall be protected with erosion control measures immediately following grading on the slopes.

This will include use of straw mulch, tackifier, and erosion control blankets. • This plan covers only the first winter following grading with assumed site conditions as shown on the Detailed Erosion Control Plan. Prior to September 15, the completion
of site improvement shall be evaluated and revisions made to this Plan as necessary with the approval of the City. Plans are to be resubmitted for approval prior to August 15 of each subsequent year until site improvements are accepted by the County.

Construction Entrance:

The existing asphaltic concrete shared driveway, acting as the construction entrance onto public way, shall be kept clean and free of mud and dirt that is tracked onto it.

A gravel construction entrance shall be installed where vehicle traffic is anticipated off of unpaved areas. The responsibility for field design to meet site conditions, and
maintenance of the construction entrance remains with the construction contractor. The owner/contractor shall remain responsible for the clean up of any mud or dirt that is
tracked onto public streets or paved areas, even with the installation of gravel construction entrances.

Catch Basin Protection:

A filter system shall be used on catch basins (drop inlets) in public and private streets, or parking lots downstream of this project. See detail ON SITE PLAN.

Sediment Filters/Barriers (Silt Fences and Straw Wattles):

Sediment filters such as silt fences or straw wattles shall be installed along the down slope edge of the disturbed area, prior to the commencement of grading.

The sediment filter structures shall be located so that all runoff from the construction site is filtered prior to crossing a property line, or entering the City storm drain system. Sediment filter structures are to be inspected regularly by County Inspection staff during inspections scheduled by the Contractor.

Sediment shall be removed when the depth of sediment is no more than one half the height of the structure. Straw wattles should not remain in place more than 12 months after installation unless it can be determining significant deterioration has not occurred. Sediment filters shall be inspected and repaired prior to, and after every storm event. Sediment filters shall be installed level along contours, and shall have upturns into the slope for the last 5'. Silt fences and straw wattles shall be installed per detail in locations identified on the Erosion Control Plan.

Plastic Sheeting/Tarps:

Plastic sheeting shall generally not be used as an erosion control measure over large areas. Plastic sheeting may be used to protect small, highly erodible areas, or to protect temporary stockpiles of material. If plastic sheeting is used, the path of concentrated flow from the plastic must be protected.

Existing Vegetation and Revegetation:

As far as is practicable, existing vegetation shall be protected and left in place, in accordance with the clearing limits shown on the approved Building, Grading, Landscape and Erosion Control Plans. Work areas shall be carefully located and marked to reduce potential damage. Where existing vegetation has been removed, or the original land contours disturbed, the site shall be revegetated, and the vegetation established, as soon as practicable, but no later than October

15. If vegetation is not established by said date, see Wet Weather Measures below.

Slope Protection:

Slopes greater than 4V:1H should be protected using straw and tackifier. The installation of erosion control blankets should be considered for all disturbed slopes steeper than 2.5H:1V and greater than 30 feet in slope length. Installation of fiber rolls staked on contour should be considered for all slopes steeper than 4H:1V, with slope lengths greater than 30 feet. Straw wattles or silt fencing should be installed at the toe of all slopes steeper than 4H:1V. Fiber rolls shall be installed per the detail.

Wet Weather Measures:

If a protective ground cover is not established by October 15, open areas shall be protected through the winter with straw mulch and fiber rolls. Straw mulch shall be applied at a rate of 3,000 lb./ac, or wood fiber if hydroseeded 2,000 lb./ac. Fiber rolls shall be installed per the detail.

General Site Protection:

Stockpiles of earth, sand and other construction related materials must be protected from being transported from the site by the forces of wind or water. This includes sand for stucco, drywall demolition debris, drywall “mud packaging, etc.

Fuels, oils, solvents and other toxic materials must be stored in accordance with their listing and are not to contaminate the soil and surface waters. All approved storage containers are to be protected from the weather. Spills may not be washed into the drainage system.

Non-storm water runoff from equipment and vehicle washing and any other activity shall be contained at the site.

Excess or waste concrete may not be washed into the public way or any other drainage system. Provisions must be made to retain concrete wastes on site until they can be disposed of as a solid waste. See Erosion Control Plan for designated Concrete Washout Area. The concrete washout area shall consist of a plastic-lined dumpster, or plastic lined earthen, or straw wattle containment area.

Trash and construction related solid wastes must be deposited into a covered receptacle to prevent contamination of rainwater and dispersal by wind.

Shoring, Construction Fencing, and other Site Safety:

The responsibility for design to meet site conditions, and maintenance of the construction site safety remains with the construction contractor. Any applicable engineering and permitting of shoring or other safety devices is the responsibility of the contractor. Construction fencing shown on this plan is for tree and vegetation protection only.

Protection Measure Removal:

The erosion prevention and sediment control measures shall remain in place and be maintained in good condition until all disturbed soil areas are permanently stabilized by installation and establishment of landscaping, grass, mulching, or are otherwise covered and protected from erosion.
4 OUTDOOR water use estimate (Non-Agricultural)
Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet
Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) Table for Carpinteria ETo Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Annual Carpinteria 2.0 2.4 3.2 3.9 4.8 5.2 5.5 5.7 4.5 3.4 2.4 2.0 44.9 Reference Evapotranspiration(ETo) 44.9
Hydrozone #
/Planting
Descriptiona
Plant
Factor (PF)
Irrigation
Methodb
Irrigation
Efficiency (IE)c
ETAF
(PF/IE)
Landscape Area
(sq. ft.)
ETAF x Area Estimated Total
Water Use (ETWU)d
Regular Landscape areas
Low Water .3 Drip .81 .37 1102 408 11350
Medium Water 0.5 Drip .81 .62 200 124 3451
Back Lawn .07 Overhead Spray .75 .75 1200 900 25054
Totals (A)2502 (B)1432 39,855.00
Special Landscape Areas (edible plants, recreational areas, areas irrigated with recycled water, or water features) 1 1
Totals (C) (D)
ETWU Total 39,855.00
Maximum Allowed Water Allowance (MAWA)e 39,855.00
a Hydrozone #/ Planting
Description
Plant Factor b Irrigation method c Irrigation
Efficiency
d ETWU (Annual Gallons
Required)
Examples
1) Front lawn
2) Low water use plantings
3) Medium water use planting
Very low water use: 0-0.1
Low water use: 0.1-0.3
Moderate water use: 0.4-0.6
High water use: 0.7-1.0
1) Overhead
spray
2) Drip
1) 0.75 for spray
head
2) 0.81 for drip
Eto x 0.62 x ETAF x Area
Single Family Residential water features, including pools, should be documented in the Regular Landscape area with a Plant Factor of 1 Non single-family (multi-family, commercial etc.) water features, including pools, should be documented in the Special Landscape area with a ETAF of 1.0.
eMAWA (Annual Gallons Allowed) = (Eto) x [(0.62) x (ETAF x LA) + ((1-ETAF) x SLA)] Where 0.62 is conversion factor that converts acre-inches per acre per year to gallon per square foot per year. LA is the total landscape area in square feet, SLA is the total special landscape area in square feet, and ETAF is .55 for residential areas and 0.45 for non- residential areas ETAF Calculations
Regular Landscape Areas All Landscape Areas
Total ETAF x Area (B) Total ETAF x Area (B+D) Average ETAF for Regular Landscape Areas must be

0.55 or below for residential areas, and 0.45 or below
for non-residential areas.

Total Area (A) Total Area (A+C)
Average ETAF B ÷ A Sitewide ETAF (B+D) ÷ (A+C)

EXAMPLE
Reference Evapotranspiration(ETo) 44.9
Hydrozone #
/Planting
Descriptiona
Plant
Factor (PF)
Irrigation
Methodb
Irrigation
Efficiency (IE)c
ETAF
(PF/IE)
Landscape Area
(sq. ft.)
ETAF x Area Estimated Total
Water Use (ETWU)d
Regular Landscape areas
Front yard 0.3 Drip 0.81 0.37 1000 370 10,300.06
Back yard 0.5 Spray 0.75 0.67 1000 670 18,651.46
Totals (A) 2000 (B) 1040 28,951.52
Maximum Allowed Water Allowance (MAWA)e 28,951.52

MWELO WORKSHEET

PROPERTY LINE

SETBACK
LEGEND
(N) ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
G
E

GAS LINE
ELEC. LINE

S SEWER LINE

W WATER LINE

BF BACKFLOW PREVENTER
Minimum 5% slope for a minimum of 10' away from strucutre (2% if surface is impervious) or to approved drainage system.

SBCO Grading Ordinance #4766

Page 277 of 523 ends

E
IA

N R OFI

OF CA L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D A R
ESNECI
L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
A2.0
1ST FLOOR PLAN

REVISION
© 2025 DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. THE DESIGN IDEAS

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -ARB PRELIMENARY APPROVAL 11-13-2025

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232

DISH TRASH

REF WINE
COND
W/D
COND
WH
2 A4.0
1 A4.0

LIVING ROOM

KITCHEN
ENTRY
BATH #1
DINING
1ST FLOOR
1,945 SQ. FT.

BED #1
UP
BATH
GARAGE
432 SQ. FT.

DEN
MUD
CL

COVERED PORCH
CL
95'-8 1/2"
12'-0" 12'-8 1/2" 9'-2 3/4" 61'-9 1/4"
6'-5 1/2" 7'-8 1/4" 12'-5 1/2" 7'-11" 2'-5 1/2" 12'-6 3/4" 18'-8 1/4" 35'-0 1/2"
50'-2 3/4" 14'-6 3/4" 18'-11"
2'-1 1/2" 19'-4 1/4" 8'-10 3/4" 10'-3 3/4" 9'-6 1/2"
22'-10 1/2" 12'-3"
FOYER
LOGGIA
feet 0 4 8
1ST FLOOR PLAN
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" 1
NORTH

Page 278 of 523 ends

IA N R OF
I
OF
C
A
L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D
A
R
E

SNECI L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
A2.1
2ND FLOOR PLAN

REVISION
© 2025 DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. THE DESIGN IDEAS

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -ARB PRELIMENARY APPROVAL 11-13-2025

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232
feet
048
2ND FLOOR PLAN
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
1 KING
KING
KING
2 A4.0
1 A4.0
P. BED
P. BATH P. CL

BALCONY

BALCONY
2ND FLOOR
1,414 SQ. FT.

STAIR

LAUNDRY
BED #2
BATH #2
BATH #3
BATH #3
CL
CL
CL
87'-10"
4'-1 1/2" 4'-6 1/8" 10'-11" 6'-6 1/8" 7'-11" 7'-0" 7'-11" 20'-0 1/4" 18'-11" 35'-0 1/2"
7'-0" 11'-5 1/2" 4'-5" 1'-4 3/4" 8'-9 1/4" 2'-0"
1'-0"
1'-5 1/2" 23'-1 3/4" 8'-10 3/4" 14'-8" 5'-2 1/4" 15'-0 1/4" 18'-5 1/2" 26'-0 1/2"
1'-6 1/2" 14'-5 1/2" 2'-4" 6'-11" 2'-4"

Page 279 of 523 ends

IA N R OF
I
OF
C
A
L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D
A
R
E

SNECI L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
A2.2

ROOF PLAN

STORY POLE
PLAN

REVISION
© 2025 DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. THE DESIGN IDEAS

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -ARB PRELIMENARY APPROVAL 11-13-2025

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232
NORTH
feet
048

ROOF PLAN
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
1 KING
KING
KING
RIDGE

2.5:12
10 4:12
4:12
4:124:12
4:124:124:124:124:124:12
RIDGE

2.5:12

ROOF ABOVE

ROOF BELOW

ROOF ABOVE

ROOF BELOW

ROOF ABOVE

ROOF BELOW
feet
048

STORY POLE PLAN
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
2 P5P5
TREE /30" 81 PALM 10" 8212.52

18.5ft 18.8ft

19.4ft

20.2ft 20.0ft

20.6ft

19.9ft

17.8ft

17.7ft

20.7ft

21.1ft
1519 12.95
1537 12.30
1538 12.61
1560 12.24
1561 12.47
1562 13.06
1618 12.67
1825 Sidewalk Sidewalk
10" Palm
Powerpole
30" Tree
F
e
n
c
e
Fence
F
e
n
c
e

13.00 1

2.00 12.00
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"E

45.00'
157.50'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
157.50'
LOT 2
22'-3"
A.F.F.
22'-3"
A.F.F.
19'-6"
A.F.F.
22'-4"
A.F.F.
22'-4"
A.F.F.
19'-6"
A.F.F.
20'-11"
A.F.F.
19'-0"
A.F.F.
19'-0"
A.F.F.
19'-0"
A.F.F.
20'-11"
A.F.F.
+1' +1'
-2'-8"
-2'-8"
+2"
+2"
+0" +0"

Page 280 of 523 ends

IA N R OF
I
OF
C
A
L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D
A
R
E

SNECI L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
A3.0

ELEVATIONS

REVISION
© 2025 DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. THE DESIGN IDEAS

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -ARB PRELIMENARY APPROVAL 11-13-2025

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232
feet
048

SOUTH ELEVATION
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
1 6
F.F. ()
0'-0"
RIDGE
23'-2" A.F.F.
7'-6"
2ND FLOOR
23'-10"
10'-3 1/8" A.F.F.
1ST FL. PLATE
9'-0" A.F.F.
2ND FL. PLATE
17'-9" A.F.F.
feet
048

WEST ELEVATION
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
2 KEY NOTES 1 EXT. FINISH: 7/8" STUCCO, LA HABRA , NAVAJO WHITE, P-525 23 ACCENT TILE: Villa Azul 10" x 10" Matte Porcelain Tile in Blue 45 BALCONIES: WROGHT IRON FINISH
DOORS AND WINDOWS: METAL WINDOW CORP, ALUMINUM, COLOR: DARK BRONZE EXT. LIGHTING: DARKSKY COMPLIANT
6 EXT. WOOD FINISH: WOOD TRIM, CABOT
SOLID STAIN, COLOR: CHESTNUT BROWN
7 ROOF: BORAL TILE WITH 2-PIECE BOOSTED

BARCELONA CAPS ON ALL EDGES

AND FOR FIRST THREE ROWS ON ALL EAVES,

WITH BOOSTED CAPS MIXED
IN FOR 15% OF FIELD,CASA GRANDE BLEND
8 SANDSTONE CAP: NATURAL SANDSTONE
WALL CAPS 4" THICK
9 SANDSTONE VENEER: NATURAL SANDSTONE
VENEER

Page 281 of 523 ends

IA N R OF
I
OF
C
A
L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D
A
R
E

SNECI L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
A3.1

ELEVATIONS

REVISION
© 2025 DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. THE DESIGN IDEAS

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -ARB PRELIMENARY APPROVAL 11-13-2025

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232
P
L
12'-0"
PL
30°
2ND FL. PLATE
17'-9" " A.F.
1 1
2 6
6 44
2 6
7 7
89 F.F. ()
0'-0"
RIDGE
23'-2" A.F.F.
7'-6"
2ND FLOOR
23'-10"
10'-3 1/8" A.F.F.
1ST FL. PLATE
9'-0" A.F.F.
2ND FL. PLATE
17'-9" A.F.F.
feet
048

NORTH ELEVATION
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
1 89
1 1
1 2
2 2
7 7
7 6
feet
048

EAST ELEVATION (STREET)
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
2 KEY NOTES 1 EXT. FINISH: 7/8" STUCCO, LA HABRA , NAVAJO WHITE, P-525 23 ACCENT TILE: Villa Azul 10" x 10" Matte Porcelain Tile in Blue 45 BALCONIES: WROGHT IRON FINISH
DOORS AND WINDOWS: METAL WINDOW CORP, ALUMINUM, COLOR: DARK BRONZE EXT. LIGHTING: DARKSKY COMPLIANT
6 EXT. WOOD FINISH: WOOD TRIM, CABOT
SOLID STAIN, COLOR: CHESTNUT BROWN
7 ROOF: BORAL TILE WITH 2-PIECE BOOSTED

BARCELONA CAPS ON ALL EDGES

AND FOR FIRST THREE ROWS ON ALL EAVES,

WITH BOOSTED CAPS MIXED
IN FOR 15% OF FIELD,CASA GRANDE BLEND
8 SANDSTONE CAP: NATURAL SANDSTONE
WALL CAPS 4" THICK
9 SANDSTONE VENEER: NATURAL SANDSTONE
VENEER

Page 282 of 523 ends

E
IA

N R OFI

OF CA L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D A R
ESNECI
L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
A4.0

SECTIONS

REVISION
© 2025 DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. THE DESIGN IDEAS

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -ARB PRELIMENARY APPROVAL 11-13-2025

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232
feet 0 4 8
SECTION @ STAIR
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" 1
feet 0 4 8
SECTION @ GREAT ROOM
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" 2

LIVING BED

BED HALL BATH

STAIR HALL CL
F.F. ()
0'-0"
RIDGE
23'-2" A.F.F.
7'-6"
2ND FLOOR
23'-10"
10'-3 1/8" A.F.F.
1ST FL. PLATE
9'-0" A.F.F.
2ND FL. PLATE
17'-9" A.F.F.

BATH

BATH LIVING ROOM

2.5 12
4 12

1. ALL WALLS AND CEILINGS SHALL BE 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD W/ PTD FINISH

SECTION KEY NOTES SECTION NOTES
ROOF SPRAY FOAM INSULATION:

R-30 HOUSE
1 2 WALLS BATT INSULATION: R-21
4 SLOPE: SLOPE TO DRIVEWAY 1/8": 1' MIN.
3 FLOOR BATT INSULATION:

R-19

SLAB ON GRADE

Page 283 of 523 ends

ATTACH 4X6 RAFTER TAILS PER
STRUC
2X SOLID BLK W/ A35 @ 16" O.C.
3X FRIEZE BLK
2X T&G

METAL FLASHING
4" DIA. GUTTER

BEAM PER STRUCT
6X8
6X6
4X6 FLAT
PLAN DIM. PER PLAN
3 1/2"
TYP. ROOF ASSEMBLY
ATTACH 4X6 RAFTER TAILS
2X SOLID BLK W/ A35 @ 16" O.C.
3X FRIEZE BLK
2X T&G

METAL FLASHING
4" DIA. GUTTER
PLAN DIM. PER PLAN 9" 2 1/2"
TYP. ROOF ASSEMBLY
2X RAFTERS PER STRUCT
3X FRIEZE BLK
2X T&G

BOLT THROUGH FLY RAFTER

INTO OUTLOOKER

METAL FLASHING
6X FLY RAFTER - SEAT CUT
6X10 OUTLOOKER, NOTCH OVER
TOP PLATE.
10 TYP. PLASTER @ EAVE
SCALE 1" = 1'- 0"
9 TYP. PLASTER @ RAKE
SCALE 1" = 1'- 0"
13 TYP. EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURE

VELUX ECL SADDLE

FLASHING
12 TYP. PLASTER @ EAVE
SCALE 1" = 1'- 0"
PLAN DIM.
2" 4"
TYP. Stone Veneer Exterior Wall
5/8" Gyp. board ptd. white
Double wall per plan
w/ spray-foam insulation
Plywood sheathing
Tyvek StuccoWrap, install
per mfg. specs w/ Tyvek tape
Tyvek HomeWrap, install
per mfg. specs w/ Tyvek tape
1" Grout Space. Provide corrosion-resistant
2" x 2" x 0.0625" wire mesh fastened to studs
with 2" long corrosion-resistant steel wire
furring nails and 8d common nails into top
and bottom plates. Also, for every 2 sq. ft.,
provide one 0.1055" corrosion-resistant wire
tie looped through mesh, with 15" legs and 2" r
ight angle bends at ends.

Stone Veneer per sched, 10" max thick
Exterior hardscape, slope 2% min. away from
foundation for min. 5'-0"
Lap 6" and tape/caulk Tyvek HomeWrap
over weep screed
2 TYP. STONE VENEER @ HARDSCAPE
SCALE 1" = 1'- 0"
ATTACH 4X6 RAFTER TAILS PER
STRUC
9 TYP. PLASTER @ RAKE
15 TYP. OUTLOOKER AND RAFTER TAIL DESIGN
SCALE 1 1/2" = 1'- 0"
4 1/2"
D=1'-9"
TYP. 8x10 Outlooker
9 1/4"
5 1/2"
2 1/2"
9"
Notch for fly rafter
NOTE: RAFTER TAILS TO MATCH EXISTING 4X6'S
1 4" 4"
interior exterior
TYP. Plaster Exterior Wall
Interior finish per finish sched.
5/8" GWB
2x exterior structural wall
w/ min. R14 batt insulation
Sheathing per structural
2 layers grade D paper
w/ 12" vert. laps, 4" horiz. laps
1 layer DuPont Tyvek StuccoWrap,
install per mfg. specs. w/ Tyvek tape
Corrosion resistant lath
3 coat integral color exterior portland
cement plaster, color per elev.

Exterior grade, slope 5% min. away from
foundation for min. 10'-0"
T.O. conc. min. 8" above finish grade
Skim coat plaster
TYP. PLASTER EXTERIOR WALL @ GRADE
SCALE 1 1/2" = 1'- 0"
16 CURB MOUNTED SKYLIGHT
SCALE 1 1/2" = 1'- 0"
FINISH

MATERIAL
VAPOR

BARRIER

ROOF FINISH

TYVEK ROOFLINER

VELUX ECL SILL

FLASHING

VELUX FCM CURB

MOUNTED FIXED

SKYLIGHT

HEADERS OR

BLOCKING AS

REQUIRED PER
CODE

VELUX ECL HEAD FLASHING,

PLACE BETWEEN

UNDERLAYMENT

VELUX ECL SADDLE

FLASHING
5" - 5 1/4"
2 3/8" - 4"
17 TYP. STAIR LANDING @ BOTTOM
19 TYP. STAIR LANDING @ TOP
PROVIDE SOILD 2X BACKING AS NEEDE FOR HANDRAIL
PROVIDE SOILD 2X BACKING AS NEEDE FOR HANDRAIL
PLAN DIM.
1 TYP. PLASTER EXTERIOR WALL
SEE 1/A6.0

HEADER PER STRUCTURAL

BITUMINOUS WATERPROOFING,

INSTALL BEHIND TYVEK

FLEETWOOD ALUMINUM WINDOW
HEAD R.O. TYP.

WINDOW BY OWNER
SLOPE PLASTER 2% TO OUTSIDE

METAL PAN OVER BITUMINOUS

WATERPROOFING, INSTALL OVER
TYVEK
TYP. PLASTER EXTERIOR WALL
SEE 1/A6.0
Sill R.O. Typ.
3 PLASTER @ WINDOW SILL
4 PLASTER @ WINDOW HEAD
SCALE 3" = 1'- 0"
SCALE 3" = 1'- 0"

WALL PER PLAN

CONCRETE CURB,

WHERE OCCURS

DOOR BY OWNER

INTERIOR FLOORING PER

SCHEDULE

METAL PAN OVER

BITUMINOUS WATERPROOFING
EXTERIOR HARDSCAPE, SLOPE 2%
MIN. AWAY FROM FOUNDATION
FOR MIN. 5'-0"
5 TYP. DOOR THRESHOLD @ HARDSCAPE
SCALE 3" = 1'- 0"
11 TYP. ROOF DETAIL
SCALE 3" = 1'- 0"
TYP. TILE ROOF ASSEMBLY

TILE PER ROOF PLAN

TYVEK ROOFLINER, INSTALL PER
MFG. SPECS W/ TYVEK TAPE

PLYWOOD SHEATHING
2X RAFTERS PER STRUCTURAL

SPRAY FOAM INSULATION
5/8" GYPSUM
8 SCALE 3" = 1'- 0"
TYP. PLASTER EXTERIOR WALL
SEE 1/A6.0

HEADER PER STRUCTURAL
2X6 BLOCKS

BITUMINOUS WATERPROOFING,

INSTALL BEHIND TYVEK

BULLNOSE PLASTER AT HEAD

MARVIN INTEGRITY

FIBERGLASS/WOOD DOOR
1" Typ. F.O.S
HEAD R.O. TYP.

PLAN DIM.

DOOR HEAD @ THICK WALL, JAMB SIM.

WINDOW BY OWNER
2X6 BLOCKS
STONE SILL, SLOPE 2% TO
EXTERIOR, 4" MIN.

METAL PAN OVER

BITUMINOUS

WATERPROOFING,

INSTALL OVER TYVEK
TYP. STONE VENEER
EXTERIOR WALL.

SEE 2/A6.0
Sill R.O. Typ.
3 1/2" Typ. F.O.S
PLAN DIM.
6 SCALE 3" = 1'- 0"
STONE @ WINDOW SILL
7 SCALE 3" = 1'- 0"

TILE BY OWNER

HEADER PER STRUCTURAL
2X6 BLOCKS

BITUMINOUS WATERPROOFING,

INSTALL BEHIND TYVEK

WINDOW OR DOOR BY OWNER
HEAD R.O. TYP.
3 1/2"TYP. F.O.S
PLAN DIM.

TILE @ WINDOW HEAD, JAMB SIM.
5 TYP. DOOR THRESHOLD @ HARDSCAPE
E
IA

N R OFI

OF CA L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H

E D A R
SNECI
L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
A6.0

DETAILS

REVISION
© 2025 DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. THE DESIGN IDEAS

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -ARB PRELIMENARY APPROVAL 11-13-2025

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232

Page 284 of 523 ends

E
IA

N R OFI

OF CA L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D A R
ESNECI
L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
L1.0

LANDSCAPE
PLAN

REVISION
© 2025 DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. THE DESIGN IDEAS

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -ARB PRELIMENARY APPROVAL 11-13-2025

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232
NORTH
PP
54 PP
55 PALM 24"
70 11.94
SIG
7 N
1 11.82
WM
72 11.55
LIGH
73 T

11.31 TC
74 11.33
FL
75 10.79
TREE /30"
81 PALM 10"
82 12.52

22.9ft

20.7ft

18.5ft

18.8ft

18.5ft

19.4ft

19.7ft

24.1ft

22.7ft

20.2ft

20.0ft

20.6ft

19.9ft

17.8ft

17.7ft

17.5ft

20.2ft

20.7ft

21.1ft

20.0ft

20.0ft
1329

13.00 1487

13.36 1488

13.71 1489

13.67 1504

13.70 1505

13.61 1506

13.37 1519

12.9 1
5 520

13.16 1521

13.35 1522

13.46 1523

13.70 1524

13.08 1537

12.30 1538

12.61 1539

13.07 1540

13.36 1560

12.24 1561

12.47 1562

13.06 1618

12.67 1641

11.47 1662

11.03 1663

11.16 1682

11.35 1683

11.49 1684

11.93 1685

12.02 1823

11.62 1824

11.67 1825

12.17 1843

12.11 Building
Sid
e
wal
k
C
u
r
b & G
u
t
t
e
r
Si
d
e
wal
k
Light
12" Palm
10" Palm
24" Palm
Powerpole
Powerpole
30" Tree
Water
F
e
n
c
e
Fence
F
e
n
c
e
Fence
2033

11.93 13.00

12.00 12.00
12 0. 0
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"E

45.00'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
157.50'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
157.50'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
LOT 2

45.00'
WM
1 GM
6 3
3 7
4 8
2 1
4 4 4
9 1
DYH

DYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYH

DYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYH
1 DYH DYH DYH DYH DYH
16 16
16 16
16 16
16 2
2 2
16 4 17
6 6

DYHDYHDYH
feet 0

LANDSCAPE PLAN
SCALE 3/16" = 1'-0" 1

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME QTY SIZE NOTES

FICUS 'GREEN GEM' INDIAN LAUREL

PLANTING LIST

IRRIGATION LEGEND

ID MODEL LENGTH MANUFACTURER PSI NOTES
5/8" Polyethylene
Dripline
500 LINEAR FEET DURA-POL 30

PLANTING LEGEND
OLEA EUROPAEA 'WILSONII' FRUITLESS OLIVE 4 24" BOX

GREWIA OCCIDENTALIS
-ESPALIER STALKED LAVENDER STAR 19 15 GAL
AGAVE ATTENUATA FOX TAIL AGAVE 16 15 GAL

BUXUS MICROPHYLLA JAPONICA
"GREEN BEAUTY" BOXWOOD 8 15 GAL
DYMONDIA MARGARETAE SILVER CARPET 50 4"
Irrigation
S.Isaac
L2.3
Project No.

Sheet Number:
18-38
Revisions:

DATE NAM E
Drawn By:
# NAM E DATE
07/2021
Details
© 2019 Kiesel Design: The design ideas and plans
represented by these documents are the property of Kiesel Design. Use or copy is permitted by contract only. The use or revisions of these ideas or plans is prohibited without the written permission of Kiesel Design.

Type:

Title:

Submittal Date:

October 5, 2020
K I E S E L • D E S I G N
Kiesel Landscape
Architecture, Inc.
422 E Main Street
Ventura, CA 93001
(p) 805.947.0730
[email protected]
CL# 5206
664 Oak Grove Gym
664 Oak Grove Drive
Montecito, CA 93108
APN# 007-140-023

12.31.22 #
Construction Documents
1 10.19.20 Arch. Revised
2 03.22.21 Arch. Revised

08.16.21 3 07.16.21 Arch. Revised
4 08.16.21 Irrig. Revised
30" LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED,

W/WATERPROOF CONNECTION

BALL VALVE
PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE, LENGTH AS REQUIRED
PVC SCH 40 ELL, OR TEE

PVC MAINLINE PIPE

FINISH GRADE TOP OF MULCH

WYE FILTER

CONTROL ZONE VALVE

PRESSURE REGULATOR

VALVE BOX WITH COVER

LATERAL PIPE
BRICK, 4 TOTAL
3" MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4 GRAVEL
1 2
5 4
3 6
8 7
10 9
11 12
13 1
2 5
4 3
4 3
4 6
8 7
10 9
11 12
13 Remote Control Valve for Spray 16 Scale: NTS
Remote Control Valve for Drip 15 Scale: NTS
3" MIN.

VALVE ID TAG
30" LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED

WATERPROOF CONNECTION
PVC SCH 40 MALE ADAPTER

PVC LATERAL PIPE
3" MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4 GRAVEL
BRICK, 4 TOTAL

FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH

REMOTE CONTROL VALVE

VALVE BOX WITH COVER
PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE, LENGTH AS

REQUIRED
PVC SCH 40 ELL

PVC MAINLINE PIPE
1 2
5 4
3 6
8 7
10 9
11 12
13 8
10 9
11 13
12 11 12
Master Valve & Flow Sensor 14 Scale: 1" = 1'-0" Section 30" MAX. 12" MIN. direction of flow
refer to local code
12"
12"
500
W
L K

I I S N
2 1
3 4
5 6
7 REDUCED PRESSURE TYPE BACKFLOW

PREVENTER

SHUT-OFF BALL VALVE

BRASS WYE STRAINER

BRASS PRESURE REGULATOR (IF
SOURCE PRESSURE IS OVER 100 PSI)

BRASS THREADED NIPPLE

BRASS UNION
6 MIL. PIPE WRAP
BRASS ELBOW, TYP.

PVC MAINLINE-CONNECT TO BRASS

ELBOWS WITH PVC MALE ADAPTERS (NOT
SHOWN)
1 CF CONCRETE SUPPORT; POUR IN

PLACE AROUND BRASS PIPE
1 2
5 4
3 6
8 7
10 9
8 10
9 Backflow Preventer 13 Scale: 1" = 1'-0" Section
FLOW
1 FINISH GRADE

JUMBO VALVE BOX AND COVER
CONTROL WIRES W/ 12" MIN. SERVICE COIL

AND WATERPROOF WIRE SPLICE
CONNECTORS. WIRE COLORS PER SPEC.'S

FLOW SENSOR PER SPECIFICATIONS
PVC 45 DEGREE ELL, TYP.

MINIMUM 10x PIPE DIA. UPSTREAM AND MIN. 5X
PIPE DIA. DOWNSTREAM OF STRAIGHT PIPE
PVC 45 DEGREE ELL (TYP.) BUSH DOWN TO

FLOW METER SIZE AS NECESSARY

PVC MAIN LINE-LENGTH AS REQUIRED
GRAVEL (1 CU. FT.)

CONTINUOUS BRICK SUPPORTS

VALVE BOX EXTENSIONS AS REQUIRED

PVC MALE ADAPTER

PVC MALE ADAPTER-BUSH DOWN TO FLOW

METER SIZE AS NECESSARY

MASTER VALVE PER SPECIFICATIONS
1 2
5 4
3 6
8 7
10 9
11 12
13 14
7 5
3 8
1 2
11 10
9 6 6
4 feet 0

TREE PLANTING
N.T.S. 5
feet 0

BACKFLOW PREVENTER
N.T.S. 2
Irrigation
S.Isaac
L2.3
Sheet Number:

Revisions:

Type:

Title:

Submittal Date:

12.31.22 #
Construction Documents
1 10.19.20 Arch. Revised
2 03.22.21 Arch. Revised

08.16.21 3 07.16.21 Arch. Revised
4 08.16.21 Irrig. Revised
30" LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED,

W/WATERPROOF CONNECTION

BALL VALVE
PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE, LENGTH AS REQUIRED
PVC SCH 40 ELL, OR TEE

PVC MAINLINE PIPE

FINISH GRADE TOP OF MULCH

WYE FILTER

CONTROL ZONE VALVE

PRESSURE REGULATOR

VALVE BOX WITH COVER

PVC SCH 40 MALE ADAPTER

PVC LATERAL PIPE
3" MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4 GRAVEL
BRICK, 4 TOTAL

FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH

REMOTE CONTROL VALVE

VALVE BOX WITH COVER
PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE, LENGTH AS

REQUIRED
PVC SCH 40 ELL

PVC MAINLINE PIPE
5 4
3 6
8 7
10 9
11 12
13 1
2 5
4 3
6 7
8 10
9 11
13 12
11 12
Master Valve & Flow Sensor 14 Scale: 1" = 1'-0" Section 30" MAX. 12" MIN. direction of flow
refer to local code
12"
12"
500
W
L K

I I S N
2 1
3 4
5 6
7 REDUCED PRESSURE TYPE BACKFLOW

PREVENTER

SHUT-OFF BALL VALVE

BRASS WYE STRAINER

BRASS PRESURE REGULATOR (IF
SOURCE PRESSURE IS OVER 100 PSI)

BRASS THREADED NIPPLE

BRASS UNION
6 MIL. PIPE WRAP
BRASS ELBOW, TYP.

PVC MAINLINE-CONNECT TO BRASS

ELBOWS WITH PVC MALE ADAPTERS (NOT
SHOWN)
1 CF CONCRETE SUPPORT; POUR IN

PLACE AROUND BRASS PIPE
1 2
5 4
3 6
8 7
10 9
8 10
9 Backflow Preventer 13 Scale: 1" = 1'-0" Section
FLOW
1 FINISH GRADE

JUMBO VALVE BOX AND COVER
CONTROL WIRES W/ 12" MIN. SERVICE COIL

AND WATERPROOF WIRE SPLICE
CONNECTORS. WIRE COLORS PER SPEC.'S

FLOW SENSOR PER SPECIFICATIONS
PVC 45 DEGREE ELL, TYP.

MINIMUM 10x PIPE DIA. UPSTREAM AND MIN. 5X
PIPE DIA. DOWNSTREAM OF STRAIGHT PIPE
PVC 45 DEGREE ELL (TYP.) BUSH DOWN TO

FLOW METER SIZE AS NECESSARY

PVC MAIN LINE-LENGTH AS REQUIRED
GRAVEL (1 CU. FT.)

CONTINUOUS BRICK SUPPORTS

VALVE BOX EXTENSIONS AS REQUIRED

PVC MALE ADAPTER

PVC MALE ADAPTER-BUSH DOWN TO FLOW

METER SIZE AS NECESSARY

MASTER VALVE PER SPECIFICATIONS
1 2
5 4
3 6
8 7
10 9
11 12
13 14
3 5
8 7
5 3
8 12
1 2
13 14
11 10
9 6 6
4 eral Lengths (Feet)
24" Spacing
al Flow (gph) Nominal Flow (gph)
250 424 322
294 508 368
350 586 414
402 652 474
420 720 488
455 780 514
" Spacing

0.9 0.6 0.9

INSET A
PVC supply pipe from
control zone kit
er spacing to be based on soil
vation. see Rain Bird XFS dripline
.
d not exceed the maximum length
oint of area.
sign pressure over 50 psi, it is
s be installed on each fitting.
spacing to be
nd changes in
ne installation
hould not exceed
ccompanying table.
gh point of area.
th design pressure
stainless steel
40 tee or ell (TYP.)
nifold
feet 0

MASTER VALVE
N.T.S. 4
feet 0

DRIP VALVE
N.T.S. 3
S.Isaac
Project No.
18-38
Revisions:

DATE NAM E
Drawn By:
# NAM E DATE
07/2021
© 2019 Kiesel Design: The design ideas and plans
represented by these documents are the property of Kiesel Design. Use or copy is permitted by contract only. The use or revisions of these ideas or plans is prohibited without the written permission of Kiesel Design.

Type:

Title:

Submittal Date:

12.31.22 #
Construction Documents
1 10.19.20 Arch. Revised
2 03.22.21 Arch. Revised

08.16.21 3 07.16.21 Arch. Revised
4 08.16.21 Irrig. Revised
30" LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED,

W/WATERPROOF CONNECTION

BALL VALVE
PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE, LENGTH AS REQUIRED
PVC SCH 40 ELL, OR TEE

PVC MAINLINE PIPE

FINISH GRADE TOP OF MULCH

WYE FILTER

CONTROL ZONE VALVE

PRESSURE REGULATOR

VALVE BOX WITH COVER

VALVE ID TAG
30" LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED

WATERPROOF CONNECTION
PVC SCH 40 MALE ADAPTER

PVC LATERAL PIPE
3" MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4 GRAVEL
BRICK, 4 TOTAL

FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH

REMOTE CONTROL VALVE

VALVE BOX WITH COVER
PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE, LENGTH AS

REQUIRED
PVC SCH 40 ELL

PVC MAINLINE PIPE
1 2
5 4
3 6
8 7
10 9
11 12
13 1
2 5
4 3
6 7
8 10
9 11
13 12
11 12
Master Valve & Flow Sensor 14 Scale: 1" = 1'-0" Section 12" MIN.
direction of flow
ocal code
2 1
3 REDUCED PRESSURE TYPE BACKFLOW

PREVENTER

SHUT-OFF BALL VALVE

BRASS WYE STRAINER

BRASS PRESURE REGULATOR (IF
1 2
4 3
FLOW
1 FINISH GRADE

JUMBO VALVE BOX AND COVER
CONTROL WIRES W/ 12" MIN. SERVICE COIL

AND WATERPROOF WIRE SPLICE
CONNECTORS. WIRE COLORS PER SPEC.'S

FLOW SENSOR PER SPECIFICATIONS
PVC 45 DEGREE ELL, TYP.

MINIMUM 10x PIPE DIA. UPSTREAM AND MIN. 5X
PIPE DIA. DOWNSTREAM OF STRAIGHT PIPE
PVC 45 DEGREE ELL (TYP.) BUSH DOWN TO

FLOW METER SIZE AS NECESSARY

PVC MAIN LINE-LENGTH AS REQUIRED
GRAVEL (1 CU. FT.)

CONTINUOUS BRICK SUPPORTS

VALVE BOX EXTENSIONS AS REQUIRED

PVC MALE ADAPTER

PVC MALE ADAPTER-BUSH DOWN TO FLOW

METER SIZE AS NECESSARY

MASTER VALVE PER SPECIFICATIONS
1 2
5 4
3 6
8 7
10 9
11 12
13 14
7 5
3 8
1 2
11 10
9 6 6
4 PERMEABLE PAVER: ANGELUS PERMEABLE COURTYARD
PAVERS, SAND-STONE-MOCHA. ASHLAR PATTERN

KEY NOTES
1 2
3 4
(E) SIDEWALK:
6' TALL WOODEN FENCE ON PROPERTY LINE: NATURAL
FINISH
5 6 STUCCO SITE WALL: 30" TALL SMOOTH STUCCO SITE

WALL TO MATCH HOUSE
7 (P) CURB CUT AND APRON:
8 (E) 30" SYCAMORE TREE TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE:

SEE ARBORIST REPORT
9 (E) PALM TREE TO BE REMOVED:
10 (E) WATER METER: 3/4" WATER METER, 1 1/2" MAIN.

VERY LOW
MED
LOW
MED
LOW
TREES
SHRUBS
IRIS 'NADA' BUTTERFLY IRIS 24 1 GAL
LOW
@ FLAGSTONE JOINTS

MATERIAL LEGEND
PEA GRAVEL 3/8"

DEL RIO OR

HANDLY GOLD
FLAGSTONE:

BUCKSKIN OR OKLAHOMA
PERMEABLE PAVER:

ANGELUS PERMEABLE

COURTYARD PAVERS,
SAND-STONE-MOCHA.

ASHLAR PATTERN

DECOMPOSED GRAITE SYNTHETIC LAWN

RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA
'MINOR'

DWARF YEDDA
HAWTHORN 26 15 GAL LOW DYH

ANIGOZANTHOS
' ORANGE CROSS'

ORANGE CROSS
KANGAROO PAWS 6 5 GAL MED-LOW

ANIGOZANTHOS
' RED CROSS'

RED CROSS
KANGAROO PAWS 10 5 GAL MED-LOW

ANIGOZANTHOS
'YELLOW GEM'

YELLOW GEM
KANGAROO PAWS 7 5 GAL MED-LOW

PENNISETUM SETACEUM
'RUBRUM'

PURPLE FOUNTAIN
GRASS 8 5 GAL LOW

CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM
'EL COMPO' CAPE RUSH 7 5 GAL LOW

SUCCULENTS

GRASSES

GROUNDCOVER
CAREX DIVULSA BERKELEY SEDGE 160 1 GAL LOW
PHORMIUM ' AMAZING RED' NEW ZELAND FLAX 6 5 GAL LOW

Page 285 of 523 ends

333 LINDEN DUPLEX
333 LINDEN, CARPINTERIA, CA 93013

PB LIVING TRUST
PROJECT:

LOCATION:

OWNER: 11-05-2025

MATERIAL BOARD
MANUFACTURER:

LA HABRA
COLOR:

EXT. STUCCO
NAVAJO WHITE P-525
BASE 100

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4465 GRANITE DR. STE. 1027
ROCKLIN CA, 95677
805.852.1677
I
MANUFACTURER:

CABOT
COLOR:

CHESTNUT
BROWN
EXT. WOOD
STAIN
MANUFACTURER:

NATURAL STONE
5 POINT DESIGN

SANTA BARBAR

SANDSTONE
MANUFACTURER:

METAL WINDOW CORP

WINDOWS &
DOORS
COLOR:

DARK BRONZE
MANUFACTURER:

BORAL

TILE ROOF
COLOR:
2-PIECE BOOSTED

BARCELONA CAPS

ON ALL EDGES

AND FOR FIRST

THREE ROWS ON

ALL EAVES, WITH

BOOSTED CAPS
MIXED
IN FOR 15% OF

FIELD,CASA

GRANDE BLEND
MANUFACTURER:

HAMPTON BAY

PATH LIGHT
COLOR:

DARK BRONZE

2.3 WATT LED

PATH LIGHT
MANUFACTURER:

MAXIM
MODEL:

WHISPER DARK SKY

DARKSKY

LIGHT FIXTURE
LED:
1-8 WATT INTEGRATED

Page 286 of 523 ends

LINDEN AVENUE

DORRANCE WAY
Building
Building
LOT 5
LOT 1
LOT 2
Proposed Lot Line to be Deleted Lot Line
to be removed

PARCEL A

PARCEL B
DATE: 8-26-2025 JOB No.: 22-57 DRAWN BY: JEREMY HENRY SHEET: 1 OF 1

HENRY LAND SURVEYING

JEREMY HENRY - LAND SURVEYOR
619 Crestview Drive, Ojai, Ca. 93023
[email protected]
(805) 216-6124
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT No._____
City of Carpinteria
County of Santa Barbara, State of California
0' 40' 80' 120'
FEET
SCALE: 1" = 40'
NORTH
Jeremy Henry PLS 8135 Date

SITE PLAN
8 1 3 5
P L S
P
ROFES

IONAL LAND SURVEYO
R
J E

R E M Y H E N
R
Y
8-26-2025

Page 287 of 523 ends

LINDEN AVENUE

DORRANCE WAY

PARCEL A

PARCEL B
Proposed Lot Lines to be Deleted Lot Line
LOT 1
R1
LOT 2
R1
LOT 5
R1
LOT 6
R1
E-2
E-1
DATE: 8-26-2025 JOB No.: 22-57 DRAWN BY: JEREMY HENRY SHEET: 1 OF 1

HENRY LAND SURVEYING

AREA TABLE

EXISTING ACREAGE
LOT 1 & 5 per R1 0.22 acres
LOT 2 per R1 0.12 acres
TOTAL 0.34 acres

PROPOSED ACREAGE
PARCEL A 0.17 acres
PARCEL B 0.17 acres
TOTAL 0.34 acres
8 1 3 5
P L S
P
ROFES

IONAL LAND SURVEYO
R
J E

R E M Y H E N
R
Y
8-26-2025
R1 = Book 9,
Maps & Surveys,

Page 95 ends

The courses and distances
shown hereon are based on
record and are not the results of
a field survey or mathematically
closed boundary survey, which
might result in different values. EASEMENTS:

E-1: General Telephone
Company of California
1436 OR 450
E-2: General Telephone
Company of California
1436 OR 451

Page 288 of 523 ends

Attachment A
Exhibit 3:

Recommended Conditions of Approval
Coeler New Residence
23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB
February 2, 2026

Page 289 of 523 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Coeler New Residence, #23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB; February 2, 2026

Page 1 ends

PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
PROJECT 23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB
333 & 355 LINDEN AVENUE
(APNs 003-440-027 & -028)
FEBRUARY 2, 2026
ATTACHMENT A, EXHIBIT 3: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

COELER NEW RESIDENCE & LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
The Conditions set forth in this permit affect the title and possession of the real property that is the subject of this permit and shall run with the real property or any portion thereof. All the terms, covenants, conditions and restrictions herein imposed shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the owner (applicant, developer), his or her heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns. Upon any sale, division or lease of real property, all the conditions of this permit shall apply separately to each portion of the real property and the owner (applicant, developer) and/or possessor of any such portion shall succeed to and be bound by the obligations imposed on the owner (applicant, developer) by this permit.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1. This Development Plan, Lot Line Adjustment, and Coastal Development Permit are based upon and limited to compliance with the project description, the hearing exhibits (Attachment A, Exhibit 2 to the staff report dated February 2, 2026), and conditions of approval set forth below. Any deviations from the project description, exhibits or conditions must be reviewed and approved by the City for conformity with this approval.

Deviations may require approved changes to the permit and/or further environmental review. Deviations without the above-described approval will constitute a violation of permit approval.

The project description is as follows:

Request for a Development Plan, Lot Line Adjustment, and Coastal Development Permit to construct a new 3,434 square-foot two-story single-family dwelling with an attached 432 square-foot two-car garage, for a total size of 3,866 square feet. The maximum roof ridge height of the residence would be 23.83 feet above finished grade. The project would include new landscaping and hardscape, including a new curb cut and driveway off of Linden Avenue. A 30-inch diameter Platanus racemosa (Western Sycamore) is proposed to be protected and retained in place, and a 24-inch diameter Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) street tree is proposed to be removed to construct the new driveway. The 912 square-foot detached garage at 355 Linden Avenue would be demolished to remedy an encroachment onto the 333 Linden property. Approximately 67 cubic yards of soil would be imported for site preparation. Access would be from Linden Avenue via the new driveway.

Page 290 of 523 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Coeler New Residence, #23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB; February 2, 2026

Page 2 ends

The project includes a Lot Line Adjustment between 333 and 355 Linden Avenue. The property at 355 Linden Avenue (Parcel A) is 9,787.5 square feet in size and is currently an “L” shaped lot with a portion of its property extending behind 333 Linden Avenue. The property at 333 Linden Avenue (Parcel B) is a 5,287.5 square-foot rectangular lot. The LLA would reconfigure the common lot lines to become a single straight line between the two parcels and take 2,250 square feet from Parcel A and add it to Parcel B, resulting in two equally sized 7,7537.5 square-foot parcels.

The grading, development, use, and maintenance of the property, the size, shape, arrangement, and location of structures, parking areas and landscape areas, and the protection and preservation of resources shall conform to the project description above and the hearing exhibits and conditions of approval below. The property and any portions thereof shall be sold, leased or financed in compliance with this project description and the approved hearing exhibits and conditions of approval hereto. All plans (such as Landscape Plans) must be submitted for review and approval and shall be implemented as approved by the City.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

2. Any exterior night lighting installed on the project site shall be of low intensity, low glare design, minimum height, and shall be hooded to direct light downward onto the subject parcel and prevent spill-over onto adjacent parcels. Plan Requirements: The selected fixtures for all exterior lighting fixtures shall be depicted on plans to be reviewed and approved by CDD and shall conform to what was presented to and approved by the ARB.

Monitoring: CDD shall review plans prior to the Building Permit approval. CDD shall site inspect prior to occupancy clearance.

3. The design, scale and character of the project architecture, landscape and signage (as applicable) shall be compatible and blend harmoniously with vicinity development and consistent with the City’s “small beach town” character. Plan Requirement and Timing:

The applicant shall submit plans for the project for final review by the Architectural Review Board prior to approval of any Building Permit for physical development.

Monitoring: Community Development Department staff (CDD) shall review submitted plans, provide direction to the ARB regarding this condition and site inspect during the construction phase.

4. All materials and colors used in construction and all landscape materials shall be as represented to the City and any deviation will require the express review of the Community Development Department.

5. The existing 912 square-foot detached garage on 355 Linden Avenue (APN 003-440-027) and any other accessory structures (tool sheds, gazebos, etc.) that encroach onto the property at 333 Linden Avenue (APN 003-440-028) shall be removed prior to the issuance of any Grading or Building Permits for the new residence at 333 Linden Avenue. Plan Requirement and Timing: The applicant shall apply for and obtain a Demolition Permit,

Page 291 of 523 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Coeler New Residence, #23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB; February 2, 2026

Page 3 ends

demolish the structure(s), and obtain a final inspection to verify the demolition of the garage and any other encroaching accessory structures prior to the issuance of any Grading or Building Permits for new development. Monitoring: Community Development Department staff (CDD) shall review submitted plans and conduct site inspections to verify removal.

6. In order to protect existing native trees and minimize adverse effects of grading and construction onsite, the applicant shall implement a tree protection and replacement plan.

No ground disturbance, including grading, shall occur within the critical root zone of any native tree unless specifically authorized by the approved tree protection and replacement plan. The tree protection and replacement plan shall include the following:
a. An exhibit showing the location, diameter and critical root zone of all native trees located onsite.
b. Fencing of all trees to be protected at or outside of the critical root zone.

Fencing shall be at least three feet in height of chain link or other material acceptable to CDD and shall be staked every six feet. The applicant shall place signs stating “tree protection area” at 15-foot intervals on the fence.

Said fencing and signs shall be shown on the tree protection exhibit, shall be installed prior to commencement of grading and/or construction and shall remain in place throughout all grading and construction activities. c. The tree protection plan shall clearly identify any areas where landscaping, grading, trenching or construction activities would encroach within the critical root zone of any native or specimen tree. All encroachment is subject to review and approval by CDD.
d. Construction equipment staging and storage areas shall be located outside of the protected area and shall be depicted on project plans submitted for issuance of a Grading or Building Permit. No construction equipment shall be parked, stored or operated within the protected area. No fill soil, rocks or construction materials shall be stored or placed within the protected area.
e. All proposed utility corridors and irrigation lines shall be shown on the tree protection exhibit. New utilities shall be located within roadways, driveways or a designated utility corridor such that impacts to trees are minimized.
f. Any proposed tree wells or retaining walls shall be shown on the tree protection plan exhibit as well as grading and construction plans and shall be located outside of the critical root zone of all protected trees unless specifically authorized.
g. Any encroachment within the critical root zone of native trees shall adhere to the following standards:

Page 292 of 523 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Coeler New Residence, #23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB; February 2, 2026

Page 4 ends

i. Any paving shall be of pervious material (gravel, brick without mortar or turf block).
ii. Any trenching required within the critical root zone of a protected tree shall be done by hand.
iii. Any roots one inch in diameter or greater encountered during grading or trenching shall be cleanly cut and sealed.
h. All trees located within 25 feet of buildings shall be protected from stucco and/or paint during construction.
i. No permanent irrigation shall occur within the critical root zone of any native tree. Drainage plans shall be designed so that tree trunk areas are properly drained.
j. Only trees designated for removal on the approved tree protection plan shall be removed.
k. Any protected trees which are removed, relocated and/or damaged (more than 20% encroachment into the critical root zone) shall be replaced on a 10:1 basis with one gallon size saplings grown from seed obtained from the same watershed as the project site. Where necessary to remove a tree and feasible to replant, trees shall be boxed and replanted. A drip irrigation system with a timer shall be installed. Trees shall be planted prior to issuance of occupancy clearance and irrigated and maintained until established (three years). The plantings shall be protected from predation by wild and domestic animals and from human interference by the use of staked, chain link fencing and gopher fencing during the maintenance period.
l. Any unanticipated damage that occurs to trees or sensitive habitats resulting from construction activities shall be mitigated in a manner approved by CDD. This mitigation may include but is not limited to posting of a performance security, tree replacement on a 10:1 ratio and hiring of an outside consultant biologist to assess the damage and recommend mitigation. The required mitigation shall be done immediately under the direction of CDD prior to any further work occurring on site. Any performance securities required for installation and maintenance of replacement trees will be released by CDD after its inspection and approval of such installation.

Plan Requirements: Prior to issuance of a Grading or Building Permit, the applicant shall submit grading plans, building plans and the tree protection and replacement plan to CDD for review and approval. All aspects of the plan shall be implemented as approved. Prior to issuance of a Grading or Building Permit, the applicant shall successfully file and receipt evidence of posting a performance

Page 293 of 523 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Coeler New Residence, #23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB; February 2, 2026

Page 5 ends

security which is acceptable to CDD to guarantee tree replacement. Timing:

Timing on each measure shall be stated where applicable; where not otherwise stated, all measures shall be in place throughout all grading and construction activities. Monitoring: CDD shall conduct site inspections throughout all phases of development to ensure compliance with and evaluate all tree protection and replacement measures. Release of performance security requires CDD staff signature.

7. Construction parking, staging, and materials storage shall be located onsite and in a manner that does not obstruct public parking for coastal access. Plan Requirements and Timing: A plan that depicts the location of onsite construction parking, staging areas, and materials storage shall be shown on the plans submitted to the Community Development Department for review prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Monitoring: CDD staff shall site inspect for compliance prior to and as needed during all grading and construction activities.

8. In compliance with the Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006 (Assembly Bill 1881, Laird) ) as amended by the May 29, 2015 Information Bulletin 2015-03 from the Department of Housing and Community Development and Chapter 15.90 of the City’s Municipal Code: Water Efficient Landscaping, a Landscape Documentation Package containing the following elements shall be prepared by a design professional: PROJECT INFORMATION; WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET; SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT; LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLAN; IRRIGATION DESIGN PLAN; and GRADING DESIGN PLAN. The preparation of a Certificate of Completion containing the following elements shall also be prepared by a design professional: CERTIFICATION OF INSTALLATION (per the approved plan); FINAL SOILS INFORMATION; IRRIGATION SCHEDULING PARAMETERS; MAINTENANCE SCHEDULES; and IRRIGATION AUDIT REPORT. Plan Requirements and Timing: Prior to approval of a Building Permit, the applicant shall submit a Landscape Documentation Package to the CDD for review and approval. The CDD shall send a copy of the Documentation Package the Carpinteria Valley Water District. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City to install required landscaping and irrigation and maintain required landscaping for the life of the project. Subsequent to installation of the approved Grading, Landscape and Irrigation Plans, the applicant shall submit a Certificate of Completion to CDD for review and approval. The Landscape Documentation Package and Certificate of Completion forms are available at the CDD, and are required to be approved by the CDD prior to Occupancy Clearance. Monitoring: CDD shall conduct site visits to ensure installation and maintenance of landscape and irrigation.

9. All mechanical equipment including heating and air conditioning units, and trash receptacle areas, shall be completely screened from surrounding properties and shall be either enclosed within a building or parapet, or located in a fenced rear yard area. Plan Requirements: The locations of all exterior mechanical equipment shall be depicted on a Roof and/or Mechanical Equipment Plan to be reviewed and approved by CDD with input from the ARB. Monitoring: CDD and ARB shall review the Roof and/or Mechanical Equipment Plan for compliance with this measure prior to approval of a Building Permit

Page 294 of 523 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Coeler New Residence, #23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB; February 2, 2026

Page 6 ends

for the development. Building Inspector shall inspect structures upon completion to ensure that mechanical equipment has been installed consistent with the approved Plan.

10. Final plans shall include the location of all above ground and vaulted appurtenances including, but not limited to, utility vaults, gas meters, fire backflow prevention systems, and check valves. The location of such appurtenances shall be approved by CDD and may be required to be located and/or screened to as to minimize aesthetic impacts.

11. The recommendations outlined in the project specific geotechnical investigation shall be followed in the construction of the subject project and the applicants shall be required to have the project engineering geologist onsite to observe all excavations prior to placement of compacted soil, gravel backfill, or rebar and concrete. Plan Requirements/Timing:

Two copies of the preliminary foundation investigation shall be submitted with the building plans for building permit plan check. Applicable plan sheets (i.e., grading, foundation, etc.) shall be in substantial compliance with the recommendations outlined in the soils report. The project engineering geologist shall be onsite during excavation, recompaction and foundation preparation work, as applicable. Monitoring: Building Inspector shall review and approve building plans and shall site inspect during construction, prior to occupancy clearance.

12. In the event archaeological remains are encountered during grading, work shall be stopped immediately or redirected until a CDD-qualified archaeologist and Native American representative are retained by the applicant to evaluate the significance of the find pursuant to Phase 2 investigations of the City Archaeological Guidelines. If remains are found to be significant, they shall be subject to a Phase 3 mitigation program consistent with City Archaeological Guidelines and funded by the applicant. Plan Requirements/Timing: This condition shall be printed on all building and grading plans. Monitoring: CDD shall check plans prior to issuance of a Grading or Building Permit and shall spot check in the field.

13. Construction activity for site preparation and for future development shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. No construction shall occur on weekends or State holidays (e.g., Thanksgiving, Labor Day). Construction equipment maintenance shall be limited to the same hours. Non-noise generating construction activities such as interior painting are not subject to these restrictions. Plan Requirements: A sign stating this restriction shall be provided to the applicant and posted onsite. Timing: The sign shall be in place prior to the beginning of and throughout all construction activities. Violations may result in suspension of permits. Monitoring:

Building Inspector shall spot check and respond to complaints.

14. All construction equipment shall be maintained in proper operating condition and fitted with standard noise reduction features (e.g., mufflers). Timing: During all construction activities. Monitoring: CDD staff shall notify the contractor of this requirement prior to construction and spot check in the field.

Page 295 of 523 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Coeler New Residence, #23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB; February 2, 2026

Page 7 ends

15. Construction materials and waste such as paint, mortar, concrete slurry, fuels, etc. shall be stored, handled, and disposed of in a manner which minimizes the potential for storm water contamination. Plan Requirements and Timing: Bulk storage locations for construction materials and any measures proposed to contain the materials shall be shown on the plans submitted to the Community Development Department for review prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Monitoring: CDD staff shall site inspect prior to the commencement and as needed during all grading and construction activities.

16. During construction, washing of concrete trucks, paint, equipment or similar activities shall occur only in areas where polluted water and materials can be contained for subsequent removal from the site. Wash water shall not be discharged to the storm drains, street, drainage ditches, creeks or wetlands. The location of the washout area shall be clearly noted at the construction site with signs. Plan Requirements: The applicant shall designate a washout area, acceptable to CDD, and this area shall be shown on the construction and/or grading and building plans. Timing: The wash off area shall be designated on all plans prior to issuance of a Grading or Building Permit. The washout area shall be in place and maintained throughout construction. Monitoring: CDD shall check plans prior to issuance of a Grading or Building Permit and staff shall site inspect throughout the construction period to ensure proper use and maintenance of the washout area.

17. Sixty-five percent (65%) or more of all construction and demolition debris generated shall be diverted from the landfill, as mandated by Carpinteria Municipal Code. Demolition and/or excess construction materials shall be separated onsite for reuse/recycling or proper disposal (e.g., concrete asphalt). During demolition and grading, separate bins for recycling of construction materials and brush shall be provided onsite. Plan Requirements: This requirement shall be printed on demolition plans. Applicant shall submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) prior to demolition and provide Public Works with a completed WMP, including receipts for recycled materials to demonstrate compliance with the City’s Construction and Demolition Program’s 65% mandatory diversion rates. Timing:

Materials shall be recycled as necessary throughout demolition and grading activities.

Monitoring: Public Works shall review and approve a completed WMP prior to issuance of a Building Permit.

18. To prevent construction and/or employee trash from blowing offsite, covered receptacles shall be provided onsite prior to commencement of grading or construction activities.

Waste shall be picked up weekly or more frequently as directed by CDD staff. Plan Requirements and Timing: Prior to Building Permit issuance, applicant shall designate and provide to CDD the name and phone number of a contact person to monitor trash/waste and organize a clean-up crew. Trash control shall occur throughout all grading and construction activities. Monitoring: CDD shall inspect periodically throughout grading and construction activities.

19. Best available erosion and sediment control measures shall be implemented during grading and construction. Best available erosion and sediment control measures may include but are not limited to use of sediment basins, gravel bags, silt fences, geo-bags or gravel and

Page 296 of 523 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Coeler New Residence, #23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB; February 2, 2026

Page 8 ends

geotextile fabric berms, erosion control blankets, coir rolls, jute net and straw bales. Storm drain inlets shall be protected from sediment-laden waters by use of inlet protection devices such as gravel bag barriers, filter fabric fences, block and gravel filters, and excavated inlet sediment traps. Sediment control measures shall be maintained for the duration of the construction period. Construction entrances and exits shall be stabilized using gravel beds, rumble plates, or other measures to prevent sediment from being tracked onto adjacent roadways. Any sediment or other materials tracked off site shall be removed the same day as they are tracked using dry cleaning methods. Plan Requirements: An erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Grading or Building Permit. The plan shall be designed to address erosion and sediment control during all phases of development of the site. Timing: The plan shall be implemented prior to the commencement of construction. Monitoring: Public Works shall perform site inspections throughout construction.

20. Dust generated by the development activities shall be kept to a minimum with a goal of retaining dust on the site by following the dust control measures listed below. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day’s activities cease.
a. During construction, use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this shall include wetting down such areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day. Increased watering frequency shall be required whenever the winds speed exceeds 15 miles per hour. Reclaimed water should be used whenever possible.
b. Minimize amount of disturbed area and reduce on site vehicle speeds to 15 miles per hour or less.
c. If importation, exportation and stockpiling of fill material is involved, soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. Trucks transporting fill material to and from the site shall be tarped form the point of origin.
d. After clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation is completed, treat the disturbed area by watering, or revegetating, or by spreading soil binders until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur.

Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown on the grading and building plans.

Timing: Condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction activities.

Monitoring: CDD shall ensure measures are on plans. Grading and Building Inspectors shall spot check and ensure compliance onsite. APCD inspectors shall respond to nuisance complaints.

21. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering as necessary to prevent transport of dust off-site.

Their duties shall include holiday and weekend periods when work may not be in progress.

Plan Requirements: The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD and the Community Development Department. Timing: The dust monitor shall

Page 297 of 523 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Coeler New Residence, #23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB; February 2, 2026

Page 9 ends

be designated prior to issuance of a Grading or Building Permit. Monitoring: CDD shall contact the designated monitor as necessary to ensure compliance with dust control measures.

22. The following Diesel Exhaust Control Measures should be implemented during construction activities:
a. Diesel construction equipment meeting the California Air Resources Board’s current emission standards for off-road heavy-duty diesel engines shall be used. b. The engine size of construction equipment shall be the minimum practical size. c. The number of construction equipment operation simultaneously shall be minimized through efficient management practices to ensure that the smallest practical number is operating at any one time.
d. Construction equipment shall be maintained in tune per the manufacturer’s specifications.
e. Construction equipment operating onsite shall be equipped with two-to-fourdegree engine timing retard or pre-combustion chamber engines. f. Catalytic converters shall be installed on gasoline-powered equipment, if feasible. g. Catalytic converters, diesel oxidation catalysts and diesel particulate filters as certified and/or verified by EPA or California shall be installed on equipment operating onsite.
h. Diesel powered equipment should be replaced by electric equipment whenever feasible.
i. State law requires that idling of heavy-duty diesel trucks during loading and unloading shall be limited to five minutes; auxiliary power units should be used whenever possible.

Plan Requirements: All requirements shall be shown on grading and building plans.

Timing: Condition shall be adhered to throughout all grading and construction activities.

Monitoring: CDD shall ensure measures are on plans. Grading and Building Inspectors shall spot check and ensure compliance onsite.

23. This Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit does not constitute approval for the installation of new and/or repair of existing underground utilities. All modifications to, or installations of new utilities shall be under separate permit(s) from the appropriate utility providers and the Public Works Department for any work within the public right-of-way.

Utility provider permission for excavation shall precede issuance of any permits for construction within the public right-of-way.

DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONDITIONS

24. Approval of the Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit shall expire three (3) years after approval by the Planning Commission unless prior to the expiration date, substantial physical construction has been completed on the development or a time extension has been applied for by the applicant. The decision-maker with jurisdiction over the project may, upon good cause shown, grant a time extension.

Page 298 of 523 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Coeler New Residence, #23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB; February 2, 2026

Page 10 ends

25. If the applicant requests a time extension for this permit, the permit may be revised to include updated language to standard conditions and/or mitigation measures and additional conditions and/or mitigation measures which reflect changed circumstances or additional identified project impacts. Mitigation fees shall be those in effect at the time of issuance of a Building Permit.

26. No permits for development shall be issued except in conformance with the approved Development Plan, Lot Line Adjustment, and Coastal Development Permit. The size, shape, arrangement, use and location of buildings, walkways, parking areas and landscaped areas shall be developed in conformity with the approved Development Plan and Lot Line Adjustment marked Attachment A, Exhibit 2, dated February 2, 2026. Substantial conformity shall be determined by the Community Development Department Director.

27. On the date a subsequent Development Plan is approved for this site, any previously approved but unbuilt plans shall become null and void.

28. To allow time for the utility companies to locate and mark their facilities for the contractor, the applicant shall telephone Underground Service Alert (USA) toll free at 1-800-227-2600 a minimum of 48 hours prior to the start of construction. For best response, provide as much notice as possible, up to 10 working days.

29. Existing and proposed easements for all utilities shall be located and described on the engineering plans or the architectural drawings prior to issuance of building permits.

LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CONDITIONS

30. The Lot Line Adjustment shall be recorded prior to the issuance of any Grading or Building Permits for new construction.

31. The following language shall be included on the deeds arising from the lot line adjustment:
“This deed arises from the lot line adjustment 23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB and defines a single parcel within the meaning of California Civil Code Section 1093.” Any document used to record the lot line adjustment shall include a statement that the document arises from a lot line adjustment that is intended to identify two legal parcels.

32. Before recordation of the Lot Line Adjustment, Developer shall provide the City Engineer and CDD with written evidence from the Santa Barbara County Clerk’s Office that Developer has executed and filed with the Clerk all certificates, statements and securities required by Government Code Sections 66492 and 66493.

Page 299 of 523 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Coeler New Residence, #23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB; February 2, 2026

Page 11 ends

CITY RULES & REGULATIONS/LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

33. This Development Plan, Lot Line Adjustment, and Coastal Development Permit are not valid until the Lot Line Adjustment is recorded and a Building Permit for the development has been obtained. The Lot Line Adjustment shall be recorded prior to Grading or Building Permit issuance. Failure to record the Lot Line Adjustment and obtain said Building Permit shall render this Development Plan, Lot Line Adjustment, and Coastal Development Permit null and void. Prior to the approval of the Building Permit, all of the conditions listed in this Development Plan, Lot Line Adjustment, and Coastal Development Permit that are required to be satisfied prior to approval of a Building Permit must be satisfied. Upon issuance of the Building Permit, the Lot Line Adjustment and Coastal Development Permit shall be valid. The effective date of this Permit shall be the date of expiration of the appeal period, or if appealed, the date of action by the City Council.

34. Before using any land or structure, or commencing any work pertaining to the erection, moving, alteration, enlarging, or rebuilding of any building, structure, or improvement, the applicant shall obtain a Building Permit. These Permits are required by ordinance and are necessary to ensure implementation of the conditions required by the Planning Commission. Before any Permits will be issued by the Community Development Department, the applicant must obtain written clearance from all departments having conditions; such clearance shall indicate that the applicant has satisfied all pre-construction conditions. A form for such clearance is available from Community Development.

35. All conditions of approval and mitigation measures shall be printed in their entirety on applicable pages of construction or building plans submitted to CDD. The approved set of plans shall be retained at the construction site for review by the Building Inspector during the course of construction.

36. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall provide a signed copy of the Conditions or Approval on a form acceptable to Community Development. Such form may be obtained from the CDD office.

37. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall pay all applicable CDD permit processing fees in full. Any outstanding plan check or inspection fees incurred during construction shall be paid in full prior to Occupancy clearance.

38. The applicant shall pay the statutory school fees in effect at the time of issuance of Building Permits to the Carpinteria Unified School District. Plan Requirements and Timing: The applicant shall submit final square footage calculations and the required fee payment to the School District prior to issuance of Building Permits. Monitoring: CDD shall ensure payment is made prior to issuance of a Building Permit.

39. In accordance with Chapter 15.80 of the Carpinteria Municipal Code, the applicant shall pay Development Impact Fees to the City prior to Building Permit issuance. The amount of the fees will be determined at the time permits are issued.

Page 300 of 523 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Coeler New Residence, #23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB; February 2, 2026

Page 12 ends

40. Prior to the issuance of any Building Permits, the applicant shall post a landscape security bond of $500.00 and comply with the following requirements:
a. All landscaping and irrigation plans shall be prepared by a State licensed landscape architect or similar professional as determined appropriate by CDD. b. The landscaping shall be maintained in good condition for the life of the project.

After landscaping has become established at three years and found to be in good condition, the security will be released.
c. Landscaping shall be drought resistant, low water species. d. Where feasible, locally adapted native plants shall be required. e. Prior to Occupancy Clearance, all landscaping and planting shall be installed; and
f. Specimen trees shall be appropriate to the site and shall be maintained in good condition so as to attain a full and healthy mature appearance.

41. Any change of use in the proposed buildings or structures shall be subject to environmental analysis and appropriate review by the City including Building Code compliance.

42. The conditions of this approval supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, and the like which may be shown on submitted plans.

43. Any and all damage or injury to public property resulting from this development, including without limitation, City streets, shall be corrected or result in being repaired and restored to its original or better condition.

44. All requirements of the City of Carpinteria (including but not limited to public improvements as defined in the City of Carpinteria Municipal Code (CMC), Section

15.16.110) and any other applicable requirements of any law or agency of the State and/or any government entity or District shall be met.

45. The standards defined within the City's adopted model Building Codes (UBC; NEC; UMC; UFC; UPC; UHC) relative to the building and occupancy shall apply to this project.

46. Any minor changes may be approved by the City Manager and/or Community Development Director. Any major changes will require the filing of a modification application to be considered by the Planning Commission.

47. No building permits shall be issued for this project prior to meeting all required terms and conditions listed herein. When not specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a building permit or prior to occupancy when allowed by the Community Development Director.

48. If, at any time, the City or Planning Commission determines that there has been, or may be, a violation of the findings or conditions of this Development Plan, Lot Line adjustment, and Coastal Development Plan, or of the Municipal Code regulations, a public hearing may

Page 301 of 523 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Coeler New Residence, #23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB; February 2, 2026

Page 13 ends

be held before the Planning Commission to review this permit. At said hearing, the Planning Commission may add additional conditions, or recommend enforcement actions, or revoke the permit entirely, as necessary to ensure compliance with the Municipal Code, and to provide for the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. The applicant shall reimburse the City for all costs associated with gaining compliance with the original conditions of approval.

49. In the event that any Condition of Approval imposing a fee, exaction, dedication or other mitigation measure is challenged by Applicant/Owner/Permittee in an action filed in a court of law or threatened to be filed therein which action is brought within the time period provided by law, this approval shall be suspended pending dismissal of such action, the expiration of the limitation period applicable to such action, or final resolution of such action. If any Condition of Approval is invalidated by a court of law, the entire project shall be reviewed by the City and substitute Conditions of Approval may be imposed.

50. The owner/applicant ("Owner") hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents, consultants and independent contractors ("City's Agents") from any claim, action or proceeding ("Claims") against the City and the City's Agents to attack, review, set aside, void or annul, in whole or in part, the City's approval of the Development Plan, Lot Line Adjustment and Coastal Development Permit (the "Project"), or any condition attached thereto, or any proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done or made prior to the approval that were part of the approval process. Owner further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and the City's Agents from any award of attorneys' fees or court costs made in connection with any Claim. Owner further agrees to pay any and all City costs, permits, attorneys' fees, engineering fees, license fees and taxes arising out of or concerning the Project, whether incurred prior to or subsequent to the date of approval and that the City's costs shall be reimbursed prior to this approval becoming valid. These commitments of defense and indemnification are material conditions of the approval of the Project. Nothing contained in this condition shall prevent the City or the City's Agents from independently defending any Claim. If the City or the City's Agents decide to independently defend a Claim, the City and the City's Agents shall bear their own attorneys' fees, expenses and costs of that independent defense.

51. Written authorization to proceed and consent to conditions of approval by the legal owner of the property shall be provided to the City prior to building permit issuance.

SPECIAL DISTRICT CONDITION LETTERS

52. Compliance with the attached Departmental and District letters is required as follows:
a) City of Carpinteria Public Works Department, dated July 26, 2023, b) City of Carpinteria Public Works Department- Sustainability Division, dated April 15, 2024,
c) Carpinteria Sanitary District, dated December 19, 2024, d) Carpinteria-Summerland Fire Protection District, dated December 19 2024, e) Carpinteria Valley Water District- Intent to Serve Letter, dated January 16, 2025, and f) Carpinteria Valley Water District- Condition Letter, dated January 16, 2025.

Page 302 of 523 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Coeler New Residence, #23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB; February 2, 2026

Page 14 ends

Approved by the Planning Commission on February 2, 2026.

I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD, AND I WILL COMPLY
WITH ALL ABOVE STATED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT.

Applicant/Property Owner Date

Page 303 of 523 ends

Attachment B
Story Pole Photographs
Coeler New Residence
23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB
February 2, 2026

Page 304 of 523 ends

Page 305 of 523 ends

Page 306 of 523 ends

Page 307 of 523 ends

Page 308 of 523 ends

Attachment C
Minutes from the December 15, 2022,
May 1, 2025, and November 13, 2025 ARB
Meetings
Coeler New Residence
23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB
February 2, 2026

Page 309 of 523 ends

Page 310 of 523 ends

Page 311 of 523 ends

Page 312 of 523 ends

Page 313 of 523 ends

Page 314 of 523 ends

Page 315 of 523 ends

Page 316 of 523 ends

Page 317 of 523 ends

Attachment D
CEQA Notice of Exemption
Coeler New Residence
23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB
February 2, 2026

Page 318 of 523 ends

Page 319 of 523 ends

Attachment F
Exhibit 2
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Coeler New Residence
23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB
September 14, 2026

Page 320 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION

CITY OF CARPINTERIA

CARPINTERIA, CALIFORNIA
February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting
5:30 P.M.

CALL TO ORDER and ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Chair Allen.

Commissioners Present:

David Allen, Chair
John Moyer, Vice-Chair
Jane L. Benefield
Glenn La Fevers
Alexandra VanAntwerp
Others Present:

Nick Bobroff, Community Development Director
Bret McNulty, Principal Planner
Syndi Souter, Senior Planner
Cody Sargeant, City Attorney

CALL TO ORDER &

ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Chair Allen led the flag salute. PLEDGE

INTRODUCTIONS, PRESENTATIONS, ANNOUNCEMENTS
Community Development Director Nick Bobroff announced that the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Surfliner Inn project is out for public review and comments are being accepted until March 9th. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) will be holding a public meeting for it on February 18th at 5:30p.m. in the Council Chambers.

ANNOUNCEMENTS

PUBLIC COMMENT
District 5 resident and Architectural Review Board (ARB) member Patrick O’Connor expressed disappointment about the approval process for the project at 4934 Dorrance Way. He said when it was reviewed by the ARB on May 1st, Design Guideline 4 (DG-4) was overlooked regarding the proportion of the second floor to the first. Subsequently, the Planning Commission’s review on August 4th addressed it and approved the project with a Condition of Approval (COA) requiring second floor reductions. He commented that the ARB’s decision-making process was superseded in that it was forced to approve the project when it returned for final drawings because the guideline had been met. He questioned whether a consequence resulted from the awkward condition and said planning should not advocate meeting COAs to an advisory body.

O’Connor then spoke about how the resulting density from state housing laws and the encroachment on setbacks is creating fire hazards, warning we could end up like Lahaina. He said additional safety measures such as

PUBLIC COMMENT

Page 321 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 2 ends

firewalls and sprinklers should be imposed on projects encroaching on setbacks. He suggested having a safety trigger when non-conformances are being used as a mechanism to significantly redevelop projects.

Nathan Pratt said he emailed a request for verbal updates on major meetings and thanked Nick for doing it. He noted there is a ballot issue for capital funds for trees and landscape maintenance. He spoke about how there is significant value in landscaping and said two big trees in front of a house create a 5-7% increase in value. Regarding fire suppression, he expressed support for firewalls, fire-rated windows and sprinklers.

Chair Allen pointed out to Mr. Pratt that updates on projects and development are given at the end of the meeting under the Director’s Report.

CONSENT CALENDAR
1) Minutes of the regular Planning Commission meeting held December 1, 2025
MOTION
Upon a motion by Commissioner La Fevers, seconded by Commissioner Benefield, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the minutes of the regular Planning Commission meeting of December 1, 2025, as submitted.

CONSENT CALENDAR

NEW PUBLIC HEARING
2) Coeler New Residence, 333 Linden Avenue
Planner: Syndi Souter
Applicant: Dylan Chappell, architect, for Peter and Barbara Coeler Address: 333 Linden Avenue
Hearing at the request of Dylan Chappell, architect, for Peter and Barbara Coeler, to consider Project 23-2232-
DP/LLA/CDP/ARB (application filed July 13, 2023) for
approval of a Development Plan, Lot Line Adjustment, and a Coastal Development Permit to construct a new 3,434 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 432 square foot two-car garage, for a total size of 3,866 square feet and a maximum height of 23.83 feet, and a Lot Line Adjustment with the adjacent property at 355 Linden Avenue that would result in two 7,537 square-foot parcels under the provisions of Carpinteria Municipal Code (CMC) §14.14- Planned
Residential Development District, §14.68- Development Plan,

NEW PUBLIC

HEARING

Page 322 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 3 ends

and §16.12- Map Provisions; and to approve an Exemption pursuant to §15303, §15304, §15305, and §15332 of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The application involves APNs 003-440-027 and -028, addressed as 333 and 355 Linden Avenue.

DISCLOSURE OF EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS
Commissioner Moyer said he drove by the site a couple of times, Chair Allen said he is familiar with the property, and Commissioner La Fevers said he visited it.

Senior Planner Syndi Souter presented the staff report. She reviewed the action options and said staff was recommending approval as presented. She proceeded to answer commissioners’ questions.

Commissioner VanAntwerp asked if Linden Avenue’s continuous civic corridor from the foothills to the beach had been weighed when evaluating the scale and ground level design. She also commented there is a scale and pedestrian experience that needs to be considered.

Souter said most of the analysis was based on the surrounding Beach Neighborhood structures where two-stories is the dominant theme for that section of Linden. She also noted the house will be set back at 20 feet, which is more than other structures on the street.

Commissioner Benefield asked if the owner indicated it would be a shortterm rental, and Chair Allen asked if conditioning for future application of short-term rentals is a discretionary action.

Community Development Director Nick Bobroff explained short-term rentals are allowed in the Beach Neighborhood provided a property owner obtains a license, and the homeowner could apply for and pursue such a license when one comes available.

In response to a question from Chair Allen whether it’s under the commissioners’ discretion that one residence versus another could not apply based on circumstances, City Attorney Cody Sargeant said his initial thought aligns with Mr. Bobroff’s. He said because it is an allowable use in this zone and there are no standards in the city code prohibiting it, he is not sure what standards the commission would be relying on in applying that condition of approval. He added he would get back with better information.

Community Development Director Nick Bobroff elaborated that the neighborhood has a certain number of available licenses and is further divided into four subdistricts with each having a certain number of licenses

Page 323 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 4 ends

allotted. He said a couple of the districts still have licenses available and others are fully occupied, with this home located in a district that currently has a waiting list.

Commissioner La Fevers asked if consideration was given to reconfiguring the driveway to save the palm tree, and Senior Planner Syndi Souter explained there was a trade-off where it was being removed to save an onsite native sycamore.

Commissioner VanAntwerp asked for information on the design guideline for garage façades, and Souter said no more than 50% of the building frontage can be garage doors. She shared her math where calculations resulted in 46% with it at 19-feet wide.

Chair Allen brought to attention that the home has 4 bedrooms and 5 bathrooms, with a room located adjacent to a bathroom labeled as a den. He pointed out it can be used as a bedroom, making the project a 5-bedroom house with potential for greater use. He asked if the home’s intention was to be a vacation rental.

Senior Planner Syndi Souter agreed the den could technically be used as a bedroom. Regarding the project’s intended use, she said all four of the Coeler projects are on a waiting list to be used as vacation rentals.

PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
Marilyn Jenkins, 301 Linden Avenue, said the project is 3,866 sq. ft., 5 bedrooms, 5 bathrooms, and two stories, while she lives next door in a one and a half story, 1900 sq. ft. house and the home behind her is 1200 sq. ft.

She said this couple is proposing three houses, all over 3,000 sq. ft., all two-story, and all on a list to be short-term rentals. She predicted 15 total people would rent them while two-car garages only accommodate two people. She complained about problems backing out of her house. She also expressed concern that her view of the mountains will be impeded, noting state law says if a view has existed a long time that it should not be impeded by new development. The view from her home and others nearby has been available since 1923. She spoke about how she was forced to combine two lots when building a house in 2008. She said this project will be five feet from the Stein House which is also owned by the Coelers and was the first hotel in town that has been there since the 1920s. She believes it will be torn down because they have let it rot, and they should be forced to tell us what they plan to do with it. She complained the project does nothing to alleviate the housing problem and is designed to be a short-term rental.

Page 324 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 5 ends

Architect Dylan Chappell described the project as being in a unique location in Carpinteria in one of the most visible corners in the beach neighborhood. Regarding why the garage faces the street, he explained that a wider lot of at least 55 feet was needed to be able to do a side-loaded garage. He described the project as the least dense on the block, nowhere near the maximum development allowed and said they could legally have come in with 3 homes and 2 ADUs on the lot. He then provided estimations about setbacks of surrounding structures. Regarding the room labeled den, he explained you are not legally allowed to have a bedroom off a garage, which is why it’s called a den, and because the home is near the beach, an extra bathroom is helpful. He said the applicant’s homes were put on the vacation rental waiting list because they didn’t know at the time what they would be doing with them. He believes this home will be a personal home for the owners.

George Manuras, agent for the applicant, clarified the Stein House is on Dorrance Way and Lot 1 and Lot 5 (behind Lot 1) are one parcel.

Regarding questions about the lot coverage, Chappell said there is 2000 sq. ft. they could apply and still be within code.

Commissioner VanAntwerp commented that other homes don’t build up to the full envelope of the parcel, which is what keeps development in compliance with the neighborhood itself and the General Plan. She said even though it is 2/3rds of the lot, it’s pushing up there with respect to neighborhood compatibility. She asked what elements they’d be willing to reduce if a materially smaller building envelope was required.

Architect Dylan Chappell said although he could do anything as an architect, they are already the smallest on the street. He proceeded to compare the project to others in the area, saying his house is not the biggest. Regarding re-designing to save the palm tree, he said they are always open and willing to save trees. He noted the tree is not on their property and there are back-out safety issues.

George Manuras, agent for the applicant, stated they would be willing to relocate the tree to make it work.

Patrick O’Connor, District 5 resident and ARB member said the project originally was proposed as a duplex then shifted to a single-family home in 2025, and the lot line adjustment was not discussed during most of those reviews. He said the ARB was reviewing structures too big for the lots, which is why discussions were wonky. Regarding the tiering of heights from the Stein House to Ms. Jenkin’s house, he said, among other things, Ms. Jenkin’s property deserves respect as a gateway property that is also important. He explained there was in fact access on Dorrance Way for the

Page 325 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 6 ends

lot that is now taken away and believes a lot line adjustment could allow for a driveway off it. He said design guideline DG-4 should be addressed.

Chair Allen asked if three lots will become two, and Souter explained there were three lots; however, Lots 1 and 5 were transferred together for so many years that the City Surveyor confirmed they had become one legal lot, and with Lot 2 one legal lot, making for a total of two.

Nathan Pratt expressed concern about the historical façade of downtown.

He said based on the renderings it could go from a finely handcrafted home to a cheesy tract home. He said he was not bowled over by the renderings which could be an apartment in the Valley, Westlake Village, or anywhere; and he doesn’t see anything that relates to the beach community about the look. He said it’s a red herring that they cannot run a driveway through the back, and the palm tree can easily be moved or replaced. He said the project doesn’t fit the vibe of what everyone is trying to do with the town, and he wishes they would take more time, look at all the projects and get a global build out perspective.

Eileen Marcussen (via Zoom and also submitted a letter) reminded George Manuras that his father Harry Manuras spoke a dozen years ago before the Planning Commission regarding the former Islands Apartment remodel project, now a short-term rental property at Linden and Third. She said he went on record saying the Coelers were going to use the second-floor unit as their home, and it didn’t happen, so when she hears Chappell saying the Coeler plan is to make it their home, she has to express skepticism. She said a hotel in disguise is right on the money, and the beach neighborhood doesn’t need any more beach rentals.

PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
Commissioner Benefield said the house is 3,900 sq ft. and not the average or the vibe for the neighborhood, and she really resents the backing out onto Linden Avenue, which could have been figured out so easily. She thinks the home is too big, explaining that they bootstrap on the last one, then make one a little bigger, while the area has a lot of small bungalow houses. She described it as too big, too large and imposing, and said it will be a short-term rental for sure. She said she fully denies it and does not want to condition it.

Commissioner La Fevers expressed support. He said heights are kept to a reasonable level compared to elsewhere in the neighborhood and other parts of the city. It’s a lot of square footage and bedrooms, but he believes property owners should be able to build the homes they want, assuming the zoning and guidelines are met. He said the architectural design is positive,

Page 326 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 7 ends

and he expects it to be a nice-looking building. He agreed it is large but would rather not speculate on how it will be used in the future. He sees no reason why they cannot work out creating an easement to the back for the garage and said it could be done with a lot line adjustment or recorded easement. He doesn’t see an advantage to having the garage on the front facing Linden and a relocation avoids the conflict of traffic, the busy sidewalk and protects the iconic palm tree.

Chair Allen said he agreed with most of La Fevers’ comments but would like to hear from the applicant. He thinks it is doable and appropriate to have an easement or lot line adjustment allowing a garage in the rear. He said it’s not good design to be backing out on Linden, and it’s not in keeping with our preferred streetscape design. He recognizes the size, bulk, and scale are within our city guidelines and the garage is back 20 feet. He doesn’t like Spanish style for the beach neighborhood and prefers craftsman. He said he would like to see it come back with a side entrance and doesn’t find the square footage offensive. He believes it will be a shortterm rental, noting it’s historically in an area where they have been approved.

Regarding short-term rentals, City Attorney Cody Sargeant explained they are allowed but noted we have a short-term rental program which has a waitlist. He explained an outright ban of short-term rentals has been struck down by the CA courts and believes it would be challenged.

Commissioner Moyer said he pretty much agrees with La Fevers. He doesn’t like the traffic situation with the garage, because there are a lot of cars, pedestrians and bikes at the same time. He pointed out that the Planning Commission denied a project on Eighth Street because the applicant wanted the garage in front where they could watch their kids play basketball. He noted we have short-term rental guidelines and rules. He spoke positively about the Coelers’ past projects, pointing out that it is expensive to build here ($1000/sq ft.) and so much of the housing stock needs to be rebuilt. He said the roof was boosted Boral which is not cheap, and there is no cutting back on any of it.

Commissioner VanAntwerp said she didn’t hear discussion about sea level rise other than in the staff report and meant to ask the applicant about it.

She said it’s common-sense stewardship to look at utilities, flood resistant ground floor materials and not rely on future armoring. She added that Linden Avenue warrants heightened sensitivity, and compatibility must consider the entire corridor and not just two neigborhoods. She thinks the project size and mass feels out of proportion to nearby homes, and the ground floor experience matters more than just the façade averaging discussed earlier. She thinks there are some real poor design concerns and

Page 327 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 8 ends

has policies she is prepared to quote, but it pretty much comes to excessive size, bulk and scale. About the garage-dominant ground floor, ways were discussed to get around it. It has weak pedestrian orientation, and the street rhythm is off because of it. She said she’s not able to support the project.

Community Development Director Nick Bobroff was asked to provide direction for a motion. He recommended continuance of the project to a future Planning Commission hearing with direction to the applicant to revise the project in such a way that the garage is relocated to the rear of the lot, with access taken from Dorrance Way at the discretion of the applicant through an easement or lot line adjustment, with a further condition or limitation that in the readjustment of the site plan and the structure itself should not move any closer to Linden than where it’s presently located, meaning the 20-foot setback from the property line would be preserved, with the living area brought to that 20-foot setback line rather than the garage at that setback line.

MOTION
Commissioner La Fevers moved, and Commissioner Moyer seconded, to continue the item to a future Planning Commission meeting and to direct staff to work with the applicant to make adjustments as elaborated by staff, with the intent to locate the garage to the rear of the lot, with access to the garage obtained from Dorrance Way, and for the location of the footprint of the residence to remain essentially the same. La Fevers asked to incorporate Community Development Director Nick Bobroff’s specific language into the motion. Motion passed 3-2 (Benefield and VanAntwerp opposed) by the following roll call vote: VanAntwerp voted no, La Fevers voted yes, Benefield voted no, Moyer voted yes, and Chair Allen voted yes.

BREAK - Chair Allen Called for a 5-minute break.
3) Verizon Wireless Communications Facility
Planner: Bret McNulty
Applicant: Celeste Magennis, Centerline Communications, for Verizon Wireless, LLC
Address: 912 Linden Avenue, (other addresses 944, 954, 962, and 970)
Hearing on the request of Celeste Magennis, Centerline
Communications, for Verizon Wireless, LLC to consider
Project 25-2336-CUP/CDP/ARB (application filed on March 6, 2025) for approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit to allow for installation of a new wireless telecommunications facility with screening on the roof top of an existing single-story retail-commercial building, including two

Page 328 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 9 ends

(2) new wireless antenna arrays adjacent to the sides of the Carpinteria clock tower, one (1) new wireless antenna array at the south end of the building , and one (1) battery and radio support equipment enclosure on the roof of an accessory structure at the rear of the building along Cactus Lane, roof top access ladders, and dedicated parking for an emergency
generator truck, and installation of utility connections within the Cactus Lane public right of way under the provisions of Section 6409(a) of the federal Spectrum Act; the Carpinteria Municipal Code (CMC) § 14.22 Central Business District, §

14.44 Visitor Serving/Highway Commercial Overlay District, §

14.62.010 Conditional Use Permit, § 14.56 Wireless
Communications; and to approve an Exemption pursuant to §15301 and §15303 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The application involves APN: 003-263- 029, addressed as 912 Linden Avenue, (other addresses 944, 954, 962, and 970).

DISCLOSURE OF EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS
Chair Allen assumed everyone had seen the site. Commissioner Moyer disclosed he spoke to the owners of Pacific Health and looked at the back part of the store where they are concerned about the structure.

Principal Planner Bret McNulty presented the staff report and said staff is recommending adoption of the resolution thereby approving the project.

Chair Allen asked if the colors, textures and materials of the new enclosures for the wireless facilities are to be consistent with the existing structure. He said colors are not always identical and asked if a condition would be acceptable to the applicant that the exterior surface be identical.

Principal Planner Bret McNulty said their understanding is that the material is a vinyl infused with fiberglass and textured to look like stucco. He explained the technology for the enclosures is getting better and if it doesn’t meet the COAs, they’ll work with them until it does. Community Development Director Nick Bobroff added they typically will have the applicant come to the final ARB to work out the details, and the Planning Commission can add additional language.

Chair Allen asked that it return to them at intervals to examine the consistency of materials for compatibility.

In response to a question from Allen whether staff supported the conclusion this location is necessary to provide service, McNulty explained that Verizon appeared to have followed the requirements by law in doing

Page 329 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 10 ends

investigations of alternatives and explaining why they didn’t choose those other sites.

The commissioners brought up concerns. Chair Allen said he doesn’t think an allowance for co-locations is appropriate for the site, and McNulty explained a permit is not included for one and it’d be up to the applicant to explain how it would work. Commissioner Benefield expressed concern about the loss of a parking space. McNulty said it was his understanding parking was not currently allowed on the space, but we can clarify and ensure we keep them allotted appropriately. About business disruption, McNulty said there’s a condition requiring that businesses won’t have to adjust their hours and ensure customers can get in and out of them during construction. Bobroff added that if there is going to be disruption, it’s something the tenant can negotiate with Verizon and the landlord.

Commissioner VanAntwerp asked that McNulty better explain how the applicant demonstrated the specific configuration represents the least intrusive means for addressing their service objectives. She wants to ensure it is not merely a convenient or preferred location. McNulty said Verizon’s study was reviewed and upon being asked for clarifications, they provided a revised document with more details. There was another site it was asked to explain why it was not chosen, and it was asked to move antennas back by ARB but according to Verizon their signals could not reach past the parapet.

VanAntwerp said 13 sites were looked at and it looked like 3 or 4 were due to a pitched roof, and the remainder were landlord issues leading to 1 out of

13. She asked how many rooftops were looked at. She noted the Memorial Hall and Library are County property and said it would be nice if those locations worked out and the City could collect the rent. McNulty responded that they did not propose any different locations, noting the owner and Verizon are in an agreement about this site.

VanAntwerp expressed concerns about adequate noticing, and McNulty explained it followed City requirements and staff considers it an important task. Community Development Director Nick Bobroff added notices are posted in the newspaper, the kiosk box outside city hall, the City’s website and more recently on social media channels through the public information officer. They go above and beyond, he said.

She also asked if an analysis of cumulative effects of wireless facilities over time in the downtown core had taken place, and McNulty explained yes, the code requires ¼ mile distance between co-located facilities, and the RF analysis is a type of cumulative analysis that considers FCC standards. The analysis in the staff report appears to demonstrate those rules have been

Page 330 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 11 ends

addressed, and a COA requires additional monitoring and check-in to ensure settings have not changed.

Regarding the scope of repair and painting of the façade, Community Development Director Nick Bobroff explained that the condition is not more specific than the façade and clocktower, so at a minimum the expectation would be the Linden façade. Staff is open to other ideas if the Planning Commission thinks the condition should go further than that.

Celeste Magennis from Centerline Communications said she was present on behalf of Verizon, along with Josh, an RF engineer. She explained that the site is important for public safety and communications and provided project details. Regarding parking, she said the parking space is shown in the drawings and there for emergencies, but parking spaces are not expected to be regularly taken up. If needed, they will park in the street, but they like to know the space is there. About alternative sites, others were investigated and it was determined no alternative one could meet their coverage needs. They also cannot do anything if landlords are not interested. There was a potential county property, but they could not find a person to speak with, while there was a willing landlord at this location.

Verizon chose the facility because it allows them to close the coverage gap with a single carefully designed facility without requiring multiple installations throughout the community. She asked that the Planning Commission recommend approval for the project subject to the conditions of approval.

Commissioner Benefield asked how much effort was put into locating those landlords or property owners who didn’t respond. Magennis said they send a letter, then a certified letter, then look for emails and phone numbers.

They send another certified letter, evaluate if they need to keep reaching out and sometimes stop by in person. Benefield said she wishes they would be more assertive and maybe provide bigger compensation for some sites.

Commissioner Moyer asked if a structural analysis took place, and Magennis explained it was submitted. In response to what they do if part of the building is deemed unsafe, she said they evaluate to see if they can remedy it and wouldn’t build there if it’s not structurally sound.

Moyer commented that the building has been let go for a long time and the owner is very old. Because it is a health food store, he said the project would be detrimental to the business because a percentage of their clientele would stop coming due to the antenna. He asked how they would compensate for that. Magennis explained she hasn’t worked on a project with this outcome and wouldn’t know how to compensate.

Page 331 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 12 ends

Chair Allen expressed surprise that the County was not responsive.

Regarding issues with matching materials, he asked how they anticipate matching what is there. Magennis explained they will use fiber reinforced plastic that is painted and matched as best as possible and have been very successful. In response to whether they would be okay with a condition to return in a couple of years to evaluate the color, Magennis said yes.

PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
Francis Brand said Pacific Foods showed up during Covid in a way that went far beyond commerce. He described it as a community hub and gathering place. He asked if alternative locations had been explored and pointed out potential sites around town, such as the vacant Rite-Aid building, Smart ‘n Final and the Veterans Building. He asked that the Planning Commission reconsider the project location and at the very least, situate it on city property so the community can directly benefit from the revenue and improve services and quality of life.

Rose Deacon asked about the age of the building, whether rent is being paid and if a health study is being done with regards to humans, wildlife and birds. She asked if there is a safe and healthy distance for people working inside the building directly underneath these installations for all those businesses. She expressed support for Pacific Health Foods, said the location is not adequate, and there must be a better place. She noted the clock tower has been around for 100 years and asked that we give it the respect and protection it deserves.

Chair Allen asked that staff or counsel address the potential health effects of radio frequency (RF) radiation above the building and federal laws about our discretion.

Principal Planner Bret McNulty explained they are limited as far as the amount of time they are allowed to review the project. He said the RF standard are established by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and it is not within the City’s purview to deny a project based on an RF report, and it is up to the FCC. He said denying a project in an area that does not have service is also not within their purview.

Mary Doiron said she has lived here since 1981, and it has been a joy to have Pacific Health Foods in the community. She said she felt safe shopping there during Covid. She questioned why Verizon cannot have access in a less conspicuous area. She commented that we are one of the few towns that still has a beach community feeling. She expressed concern about RFs coming through the ceilings and said we need to really think about where we are putting this.

Page 332 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 13 ends

Rick Jeffers said he has seen studies and research that show there are headaches, dizziness and sleep disturbances due to proximity of cell towers.

He questioned why Verizon doesn’t find a place where the city can benefit if it’s paying money and place the tower where it is not in harm’s way for anybody. He said kids sit at the tables and eat lunch there, noting cell towers are not placed near schools due to children’s thin cranials. Among other things, he expressed concern about contamination of the store’s food itself. He added there isn’t another store for miles that offers the wide spectrum offered at Pacific Health Foods.

Geoffrey Jensen questioned why Verizon does not build a 50-ft lighthouse on the Bluffs and disguise an antenna or put it on top of the 18-story proposed apartment building at the Frontier Communications property. His comments included that we’re in danger of losing the charm that makes people want to come here, we’re pricing out the people that make Carpinteria what it is, and you cannot park downtown anymore. He expressed disappointment at recent changes taking place around Carpinteria and said “Keep Carp Shoal” which he said means keep it ours. He implored not to bow to corporate greed.

Nathan Noll, owner of Pacific Health Foods, expressed opposition. His comments included that they re-did the accessory building on the back half of the store and structurally it is not sound to hold any equipment.

Equipment to run the compressors for a walk-in freezer and refrigerator had to be on the main roof due to its weight. Placing equipment on top of the accessory building would hinder their business quite a bit, and it used to be a tin shed that they framed in and made part of the store. He explained that the ladder moved to the side is where they receive all their pallets and will restrict how they will get product into the store. He spoke about how they’ve served the community for decades and their customer base trusts them. He described their customers as the type that would not be persuaded by RF regulatory assurances alone and expressed concern that their trust would be eroded due to the antenna. He expressed economic concerns. He said they have been in talks with the landlord about repairing some of the building and preserving the character as the key entrance to Carpinteria. He said it is not an appropriate or compatible location for the project and asked that they recognize that the proposal’s place is not a good place for towers.

BREAK – Chair Allen called for a 3-minute break.

Roy Lee, 1st District County Supervisor, said his office never received notices and something was amiss. He said the County is open to having the towers at its facility on Walnut Ave, and they’re more than happy to work with Verizon and the community to bring forward the best and safest

Page 333 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 14 ends

project for everyone.

ARB member Patrick O’Connor said ARB spent a lot of time on the design, but they were expressly not able to address the main points which are location or building codes. He suggested in a situation like this the Planning Commission should have reviewed the project first, not after the ARB. He said somehow the judgement that location and building codes were unimportant is a miss. He described the situation as a third missed opportunity on the combination of all these boards this month, which isn’t a good start to the year. He requested that we put the shot clock back.

Whitney Noll, owner of Pacific Health Foods, expressed opposition.

Among other things, she said they were never notified about the second ARB meeting and asked for hand delivery of notices. She expressed concerns about the physical integrity of the building and accessory structures, as well as risks due to additional structural loads. Her comments included the roof needs full replacement according to local contractors.

There are 4-foot horizontal cracks in the cinderblock wall above the backoffice window where rainwater penetrates and the proposed antenna will be located. Pinched office windows indicate shifting of the block wall and ongoing structural movement. The back wall had an opening cut out for a roll-up door and adding weight or stress could further weaken it. Concrete walls might not hold up on downtown buildings built in the 1930s/40s. Dry rot and subterranean damage has been found on storefronts and supporting lumber. The accessory structure behind the building was marginally constructed, and a ladder cannot go there due to confirmed rot. Regarding parking, she said to obtain her building permit two spaces were required.

Verizon said they did not need a spot, but one will be needed if their generator goes out, and they cannot block traffic on Cactus Lane. She asked that the Planning Commission give serious consideration to the cumulative structural and operational risks proposed by the project.

Eddie Hall, safety coordinator of the Farmers Market on Linden, said store owners asked that he speak on their behalf. He said they object to 5G energy bombarding their stores. He spoke about an experience last Wednesday at Farmers Market where he and other vendors were feeling energy on Seventh Street while motorists were driving erratically. He expressed opposition, describing the energy as dangerous and commenting he would never believe what an RF engineer says.

Note: AK submitted a public comment letter prior to the meeting.

PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
The applicant was asked if the shot clock could be extended. Celeste

Page 334 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 15 ends

Magennis said it expires tomorrow and they were hoping for approval with conditions. She said they would have to extend the shot clock and requested a break so she could contact Verizon about it.

RECESS – Chair Allen called for a 5-minute recess.

Celeste Magennis returned and said Verizon would like a continuance. It is also asking for a condition that if they want them to work with the County that there be a timeframe on the lease for approvals, so if the County falls through this location comes back for consideration.

Discussion followed about the application process. City Attorney Cody Sargeant stated there is currently a signed agreement between the applicant and City that set the shot clock expiration date as tomorrow, but if the applicant is mutually willing to extend the date, it will keep the application open as they explore other options. If the County’s option don’t pan out, they would still have this as a pending application under the mutually agreed shock clock, he said.

The continuance was discussed. Chair Allen asked about its length and Magennis suggested two months. He clarified it would be two months to a future Planning Commission hearing date and Magennis agreed. Bobroff asked if it would simply be a commitment that the alternative location with the County has promise or a fully redesigned project with RF studies.

Magennis said they will explore but want this location as an alternative.

City Attorney Cody Sargeant clarified the continuance would include extending the tolling agreement that the parties entered on October 29th.

Magennis agreed.

Commissioner La Fevers expressed support for a continuance and asked that staff contact the 1st District Supervisor’s office to facilitate expediting the process. The commissioners agreed with La Fevers’ recommendation.

MOTION
Commissioner La Fevers moved to continue the item to the April regular Planning Commission meeting and the motion include that the applicant has agreed to suspend or reset the shock clock on this project, and that during this time period city staff work with the County Supervisor 1st District Office to facilitate the lease agreement with the County.

Commissioner Moyer seconded the motion.

In response to concerns two months was not long enough and whether three months was okay, Magennis noted the County’s eagerness. She explained she needs to talk to Verizon but doesn’t want to appear sloppy by extending

Page 335 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 16 ends

it past two months. She said they will need a commitment and basic terms to proceed from the County.

MOTION PASSED
Motion passed 5-0 by the following roll call vote: Commissioner VanAntwerp voted yes, Commissioner La Fevers voted yes, Commissioner Benefield voted yes, Commissioner Moyer voted yes, and Chair Allen voted yes.

Regarding concerns about what can be accomplished in two months, Community Development Director Nick Bobroff clarified the two-month continuance is for Verizon to see if there is strong potential or likelihood a deal can be made with the County.

OTHER BUSINESS
Community Development Director Nick Bobroff suggested that the selection of the Chair and Vice Chair be agendized for the March Planning Commission meeting. The commissioners agreed.

OTHER BUSINESS

MATTERS PRESENTED BY COMMISSIONERS
Chair Allen shared information on harbor seal counts, noting there is a continuing downward trend again this year.

Commissioner VanAntwerp encouraged distribution of the BEACON sea level rise adaptation presentation to the general public.

MATTERS

PRESENTED
DIRECTOR’S REPORT
4) Action Minutes of the Architectural Review Board Meeting of October 16, 2025 and November 13, 2025
5) City Calendar for the month of February
6) Planning Activity Report as of January
7) Building Permit Report as of January
Community Development Director Nick Bobroff reported that the Chevron decommissioning has commenced and provided details on its phases. In addition, building permits were issued for the Palms and Arnie’s Rooftop Bar, with renovations underway. He said updates on larger housing projects can be found on the City’s website, such as Lagunitas (Via Real Townhomes), Bluffs 1/Tee Time at 5885 Carpinteria Avenue, and the project at 5115 Ogan Road. He added that the Via Real Project was submitted for the third time, with a completeness determination to be issued later this week, and Tee Time’s application was called complete at the end of last year, with an EIR required and consistency review in progress.

DIRECTOR'S REPORT

Page 336 of 523 ends

MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION February 2, 2026
Regular Meeting

Page 17 ends

He also reported that the application for 5115 Ogan Road was called incomplete for the third time, and the applicant is claiming the City is conducting a course of conduct for improper purposes, such as to harass or cause unnecessary delays. He explained a notice must be posted about this on the City website for 60 days to receive public comment, then the City must issue a statement to the applicant within 30 days to cease the conduct or provide written findings explaining what we have asked for. He stated it sets the steps for a potential legal challenge by the applicant.

ATTENDANCE OF PLANNING COMMISSIONERS FOR THE
NEXT MEETING OF Monday, March 2, 2026 – All commissioners indicated they plan to be present.

ATTENDANCE FOR

NEXT MEETING
ADJOURNMENT – Chair Allen adjourned the meeting at 10:10 p.m. ___________________________
Secretary, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
___________________________
Chair, Planning Commission

ADJOURNMENT

Page 337 of 523 ends

Attachment F
Exhibit 3
Public Comment Letter Received by the
Planning Commission
Coeler New Residence
23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB
September 14, 2026

Page 338 of 523 ends

From: Public Comment
To: Syndi Souter
Cc: Nick Bobroff
Subject: Fw: Public Comment Submission
Date: Monday, February 2, 2026 12:14:48 PM
From: No Reply <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 2, 2026 11:57 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Public Comment Submission
**EXTERNAL EMAIL**
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Carpinteria. DO NOT OPEN attachments or CLICK on links unless you are sure they are safe. Remember, reputable vendors, banks, etc. will not ask you to disclose passwords or other sensitive information.

Submitted by: Eileen Marcussen
Email Address: [email protected]
Commented on event: https://carpinteriaca.portal.civicclerk.com/event/62/overview If you are having trouble viewing the URL above, cut and paste the string into your browser window.

User comment: A proper review of the 'Coeler Residence' at 333 (& 355?) Linden Avenue should include some examination of how it will be used, ultimately -- as a Short Term Rental -- and the impacts associated with that type of business to the parcel(s)' surrounding user(s) and the Beach Neighborhood in general. The two parcels -- 333 and 355 Linden Avenue -- represent a very deep and dense piece of Barbara and Peter Coeler real estate holdings in the Beach Neighborhood The Coeler's are also developing neighboring -- right around the corner - - parcels at 4949 Dorrance Way and 4934 Dorrance Way. PB Living Trust (Peter and Barbara Coeler) has four addresses on the City of Carpinteria's Short Term Rental list: 355 Linden Avenue, Unit A 355 Linden Avenue, Unit B 4949 Dorrance Way 4934 Dorrance Way Playa Beach Lodging, the five unit STR located at 251 Linden Avenue, is another Coeler property and has been in business for more than a decade. 333 Linden Avenue is not yet on the City's STR wait list but I believe that is the intention, the trend, no? Yes! The new 'Coeler Lodging Compound' (or Playa Lodging Compound #2) will be formed when these five 'in-the-planningstage' properties move off of the City's STR wait list and become full-time STRs. This surrounding user and neighbor doesn't think that is so great for the City's brand, it's "small beach town character." The City of Carpinteria's General Plan needs to explicitly define what “small beach town character," an oft-used phrase found in almost all of its Community

Page 339 of 523 ends

Development Department's 'Staff Reports,' means. It is a phrase too conveniently used to support just about every development in the City of Carpinteria. It is a phrase so over-used that whatever meaning ascribed it, implied by it, has been rendered trite and impotent. Still, Carpinteria is a small beach town. Google (assisted by A.I., naturally) provides the following data for the City of Carpinteria: Key Population Figures: * 2020 Census: 13,264 * 2023 Estimate: Around 13,100 * 2026 Projection: Approximately 12,876 (with a declining trend).

Key Demographics: * Median Age: 44.5 years (2023). * Households: About 5,138 (2020-2024). * Persons per Household: 2.53 (2020-2024) And, in another Google search (with an A.I. assist), describes Carpinteria as follows: Carpinteria, California, is generally considered a suburban or small-town coastal community rather than a major urban area. I ACCEPT THIS REALITY. The Coeler projectS are in the Beach Neighborhood. This residential neighborhood is also one of the more "visitor-serving" neighborhoods in Carpinteria because of the lodging opportunities available for vacationers, especially along Sandyland Road. But, In the last twenty years, many of the Beach Neighborhood's residential lots/parcels -- especially those on 3rd, Dorrance and 4th Streets -- have been developed with "infill" projects, ADUs, etc. With this greater (building) density, one might expect to see more bodies moving about the Beach Neighborhood; that there would be more residents, stakeholders going about their daily lives and routines, yearround. That doesn't seem to have happened. With all of the lot development that I've seen in the Beach Neighborhood in the past two decades, only a few people seem to have made the Beach Neighborhood their home (full or part-time). In fact, the neighborhood seems to be over-developed and under-populated, growing only more hollowed out. I certainly would not use the word "URBAN" to describe this piece of Carpinteria. "URBAN" is hardly how I would describe any part of Carpinteria. So, when I read through the Staff Report and come across a passage that reads: "Staff believes all of the necessary finding can be made. The proposed project is consistent with the type and intensity of development anticipated in urbanized areas of the City's beach neighborhood." I am offended. I know "urban" well. I love "urban," too! And, I do appreciate that there is a vocabulary that City Planners utilize for reports and reviews but "urbanized" is used here to give developers and the City a pass on exploiting a neighborhood and re-imagine (erase) its character to fit their (personal) agenda for financial gain. Isn't the City supposed to focus on "protecting unique, natural, and visual resources to maintain a "small beach town" image?" I paid a visit to the wide world web and performed a search. From Google (an AI Overview): My query: "how the word "urbanized" is used by city planning" In city planning, "urbanized"describes geographic areas with high population density (typically 50,000+ residents) and intense infrastructure development, often marking the threshold where rural land formally shifts to urban usage. It is used to define Censusdesignated boundaries (Urbanized Areas), guide land-use planning, and manage infrastructure expansion. Key ways "urbanized" is used in city planning: Defining Urban Areas: The U.S.

Census Bureau defines an "Urbanized Area" (UA) as a continuously built-up, densely settled area of 50,000 or more people, serving as a basis for federal funding and planning.

Infrastructure & Development Planning: It refers to regions where land has been transformed for urban use, requiring specialized infrastructure, services, and zoning (e.g., roads, sanitation,

Page 340 of 523 ends

housing, services). Annexation and Growth Boundaries: Planners use this term to determine when land is "urbanized enough" to be annexed into a city or included within urban growth boundaries. Density Requirements: It frequently requires a minimum population density of at least 1,000 people per square mile, separating urban, suburban, and rural planning strategies.

THIS IS NOT A CARPINTERIA REALITY. Don't describe the Beach Neighborhood "urbanized." Our City's Beach Neighborhood is central to providing Carpinteria its “small beach town character;" don't let STRs proliferate and erode its small town charm. We don't need a COMPOUND of STRs. We need HOUSING. Will the Coeler developments assist Carpinteria in meeting its RHNA Housing Element allocation for the 2023-2031 period? Please. I would love if the Coeler's projects would help Carpinteria reach this goal.

Page 341 of 523 ends

Attachment G
June 1, 2026 Planning Commission Packet
Coeler New Residence
23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB
September 14, 2026

Page 342 of 523 ends

Attachment G
Exhibit 1
Planning Commission Staff Report
Coeler New Residence
23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB
September 14, 2026

Page 343 of 523 ends

AGENDA ITEM #3
PROJECT 23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB

PLANNING COMMISSION

STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: June 1, 2026

ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION
Coeler New Residence
Project 23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB
Request to approve a Development Plan, Lot Line Adjustment, and Coastal Development Permit to construct a new 3,520 square foot two-story single-family residence with a detached 840 square foot three-car garage and adjust the lot line with the adjacent property at 355 Linden Avenue; and to accept a categorical exemption pursuant to §15303, §15304, §15305, and §15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Report prepared by: Syndi Souter, Senior Planner
Community Development Department ______________________________

SIGNATURE
Reviewed by: Nick Bobroff, Director
Community Development Department ______________________________

SIGNATURE
Owners: Peter and Barbara Coeler
Agent: Dylan Chappell, Architect
Project Location: 333 and 355 Linden Avenue
APNs: 003-440-027 and -028
Zoning: Planned Residential Development
(PRD-20)
Land Use Designation: Medium Density
Residential (MDR)
I. RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached Resolution No. PC-26-001, thereby approving Project 23-2232- DP/LLA/CDP/ARB to construct a new 3,520 square foot two-story single-family residence with a detached 840 square foot three-car garage and adjust the lot line with the adjacent property at 355 Linden Avenue; and to accept a categorical exemption pursuant to §15303, §15304, §15305, and §15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Project Site

Page 344 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 2 ends

II. PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Development Plan
The requested Development Plan would allow the construction of a new 3,520 square-foot two-story single-family dwelling and a detached 840 square-foot three-car garage. The maximum roof ridge height of the residence would be 24.08 feet above finished grade and the height of the detached garage would be 14.5 feet. The project would include new landscaping and hardscape, including a new curb cut and driveway from Dorrance Way. A 30-inch diameter Platanus racemosa (Western Sycamore) is proposed to be protected and retained in place on site. The 912 square-foot detached garage at 355 Linden Avenue would be demolished to remedy an encroachment onto the 333 Linden Avenue property. Approximately 67 cubic yards of soil would be imported for site preparation.

Access would be from Dorrance Way via the new driveway.

Lot Line Adjustment (LLA)
The project includes a Lot Line Adjustment between 333 and 355 Linden Avenue. The property at 355 Linden Avenue (Parcel A) is 9,787.5 square feet in size and is currently an “L” shaped lot with a portion of its property extending behind 333 Linden Avenue. The property at 333 Linden Avenue (Parcel B) is a 5,287.5 square-foot rectangular lot. The LLA would reconfigure the common lot lines to become a single straight line between the two parcels and take 2,250 square feet from Parcel A and add it to Parcel B, resulting in two equally sized 7,537.5 square-foot parcels. A 15-foot-wide nonexclusive easement for the benefit of Parcel B is proposed across the rear of Parcel A for ingress and egress from Dorrance Way to the proposed garage.

Coastal Development Permit
A Coastal Development Permit is required to allow the proposed development as described above.

Proposed plans are included as Attachment A, Exhibit 2. Story poles for a prior design were erected on April 14, 2025, and are substantially similar in height and locations as the current proposal; photographs can be found in Attachment B.

III. BACKGROUND
Site Characteristics and Background
The project area consists of two separate parcels. The property at 355 Linden Avenue (Parcel A) is located at the corner of Linden Avenue and Dorrance Way and is presently developed with a 2,460 square-foot two-story residential structure and a 912 square-foot detached garage. The property at 333 Linden Avenue (Parcel B) is a vacant parcel that is 5,287 square feet in size and is located on the west side of Linden Avenue, across the street from Linden Field. The project site is located in the Beach Neighborhood (Community Design Subarea 1), which is comprised of a mix of single- and multi-family residences. The site is immediately surrounded by a two-story residence with accessory structures and The Spot restaurant to the north, Linden Field and the Carpinteria State Beach campgrounds to the east (across Linden Avenue), a two-story single-family residence to the south,

Page 345 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 3 ends

and a vacant lot and residences to the west. The general vicinity contains one- and two-story residential structures.

The site is zoned Planned Residential Development (PRD-20) and has a Medium Density Residential (MDR) land use designation. The project site is not currently located in any overlay districts. The site is, however, located in an area identified as being vulnerable to future sea level rise impacts as discussed in the City’s Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Plan (SLRVAAP).1 Architectural Review Board
Concept Review
A concept proposal, Project #22-2177-CON, for a duplex on this site was previously reviewed by the Architectural Review Board (ARB) on December 15, 2022 prior to the formal project application submittal on July 13, 2023. (Note that the formal application was originally also for a duplex, and the plans have since been revised for a single-family dwelling.) The ARB had the following comments on the concept proposal for this site:
 The architecture is very “Santa Barbara” style; instead of Spanish, consider a bungalow or Monterey style of architecture,
 Lower the plate heights and step in the second story to bring the massing down as viewed from the street,
 Use colors that add variety to better fit the neighborhood,  Increase the setbacks and reduce the overall massing, and  The garage doors facing the street were acceptable, but narrow the driveway width.

Preliminary Review
A formal project application for a new duplex on the site was submitted on July 13, 2023, and subsequently revised plans for a Spanish/Mediterranean style 3,251 square-foot two-story singlefamily residence with an attached 426 square-foot two-car garage, for a total size of 3,677 square feet with a maximum height of 24.42 feet, were submitted in December 2024. The proposal for the singlefamily residence received preliminary review by the ARB on May 1, 2025. At that meeting, one neighbor spoke and submitted a comment letter raising concerns about privacy, the height and size of the residence, and the architectural style. Another neighbor submitted only a comment letter with concerns about privacy and sea level rise impacts.

The ARB reviewed the design for the single-family dwelling and voted 4-0 to continue the project to a future meeting with the following comments:
 The Spanish/Mediterranean style is acceptable,
 The “muscular” massing should be scaled down to a scale similar to the residence at 355 Linden Avenue,
 The plate heights should be reduced to lower the overall height,  Reduce the overall size of the residence,
1 The City’s SLRVAAP can be found on the website here: https://carpinteriaca.gov/city-hall/communitydevelopment/planning/general-plan-local-coastal-plan-update/

Page 346 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 4 ends

 The floor plan should have direct access to the backyard and fewer than five bedrooms,  Add gables and pop-outs to add articulation to the long walls, and  With the understanding that the sycamore would be retained, a new palm should be planted on Linden Avenue to replace the palm to be removed.

The plans were revised in response to the ARB comments with the following changes:
• A Lot Line Adjustment was incorporated into the project which would reconfigure the lot line between the property at 355 Linden Avenue (which is currently an “L-shaped” parcel) and the project site to create two parallel parcels of equal size at 7,537 square-feet; • The size of the residence was increased by 189 square feet and a new 356 square-foot covered porch was added to the rear of the residence;
• The plate heights on the second story were reduced to a range of 7.5-feet to 9.5-feet, which lowered the overall height from 24.42-feet to 23.83-feet, a reduction of seven inches; • The floor plan was reconfigured with the main living area accessible to the backyard and now contains four bedrooms;
• Pop-outs with open gable roofs have been added to the side and rear elevations to articulate the massing;
• The design has been “softened” with more Mediterranean style details and features such as:
additional arched windows, adding Santa Barbara stone accents to the front and side walls, the roof pitch on the second story was raised from 2.5:12 to 4:12, the incorporation of shallow or no roof overhangs, additional scallop details in the stucco below the areas without a roof overhang, and an additional tiled arch surround on the northern garage window; • The second floor has been “wedding-caked” above the first floor at distances ranging from 7- feet to 2-feet on the sides and set back 18.5 feet from the front; • The landscaping plan has been revised to include a variety of ornamental flowering shrubs and grasses, in addition to perimeter hedges and a lawn area with olive trees in the rear yard; and
• The proposal continues to retain the existing 30-inch diameter native Platanus racemosa (Western Sycamore) that is located at the front of the property, and a tree protection plan has been prepared for the project (see Sheet TPP0.0 in Attachment A, Exhibit 2).

The revised design for the single-family residence received a second preliminary review by the ARB on November 13, 2025. No public comment letters were submitted, and one member of the public spoke with concerns about the existing hedge height blocking views of the story poles, suspicions that the new residence would be a vacation rental, and the size of the proposed residence. The ARB members were generally happy with the revised design, and voted 4-0 to recommend preliminary approval to the Planning Commission with the following comments on the revised design:
 A tree should be added in the planter on the north side of the driveway;  Additional landscaping should be added along the common property line with the adjacent residence at 355 Linden Avenue; and
 Consider a darker cream/beige stucco color, similar to the color of the stucco at Dart Coffee in Linden Square.

The plans were updated in response to the ARB comments with the following changes:

Page 347 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 5 ends

• The landscaping plan has been updated to include an olive tree and additional shrubs along the northern property line to soften views from the street; and • The proposed color for the stucco remains Navajo White, due to the subsequent Final ARB approval of the new residence at 4949 Dorrance Way with a darker cream/beige stucco color (Greek Villa), to avoid two houses with the same color in close proximity.

Copies of the Minutes from the December 15, 2022, May 1, 2025, and November 13, 2025 ARB meetings are included in Attachment C.

Planning Commission
The Planning Commission initially reviewed the project on February 2, 2026. At that meeting, four members of the public spoke with concerns about the new residence becoming a vacation rental, safety issues with the proposed driveway on Linden Avenue, the size of the proposed residence, impacts to private mountain views, and the neighborhood compatibility of the design. One of the speakers also submitted a public comment letter which reiterated their spoken comments.

The Planning Commissioners had mixed comments on the proposal, including concerns that the proposal was too large and not compatible with the neighborhood, hesitancy about the possibility of the new residence becoming a vacation rental, reluctance to allow the removal of the iconic palm tree on Linden Avenue, and support for the proposal as a reasonable improvement on the site that would improve the quality of our housing stock. One issue that the Commissioners unanimously agreed upon was the safety concerns about the new driveway on Linden Avenue, and that the access should be relocated to Dorrance Way. After a lengthy discussion, the Commissioners voted 3-2 to continue the item with direction to the applicant to revise the project in a way that the garage would be relocated to the rear of the property with access from Dorrance Way, and that the overall footprint of the residence, as it relates to the front setback, would not substantially be changed.

The project was scheduled to be reviewed by the Planning Commission at their May 4, 2026 meeting, but the applicant requested a continuance to the June 1, 2026 meeting.

A copy of the plans that were reviewed at the February 2, 2026 Planning Commission meeting can be found in Attachment D, and a copy of the minutes from that meeting are included in Attachment E.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL
This project can be found to be categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Sections 15303 (new construction or conversion of small structures); 15304 (minor alterations to land); 15305 (minor alterations in land use limitations); and 15332 (in-fill development projects) of the Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Class 3 Exemptions include, but are not limited to, the construction of a new single-family residence with a detached garage. Class 4 Exemptions allow for minor alterations to land that include grading on land with a slope of less than 10%, new landscaping, and minor trenching and backfilling where the surface is restored. Class 5 Exemptions allow for minor lot line adjustments that do not result in the creation of a new parcel. Class 32 Exemptions allow for in-fill development projects provided the project: is consistent with the applicable general plan policies and zoning regulations; the site is within city limits on a site no larger than five acres surrounded by urban uses; the site has no habitat value for

Page 348 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 6 ends

rare, threatened, or endangered species; the approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

The project meets the requirements for the listed Categorical Exemptions as the project includes the construction of a new single-family residence, a detached garage, associated grading (including utility trenches and over-excavation and recompaction for the foundation), landscaping improvements, and a lot line adjustment that would not create a new parcel; wherein the project is consistent with the City’s General/Coastal Plan and Zoning Code, is located within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, and the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. As the project is consistent with these standards, the exemption is appropriate.

The proposed CEQA Notice of Exemption is included as Attachment F.

V. ANALYSIS
The project has been revised in response to the Planning Commission’s comments with a new detached garage located at the rear of the property and access taken from Dorrance Way via a proposed 15-foot-wide easement over 355 Linden Avenue. The front of the residence remains set back 20-feet from Linden Avenue, now with a living room facing the street. The overall size of the residence was reduced by 346 square-feet with the new detached garage layout, and the number of bedrooms was reduced from five down to four. Although the size of the residence was reduced, the total overall square footage increased by 494 square feet due to the newly proposed detached three-car garage. The rear covered porch has been eliminated, and replaced with a courtyard between the residence and the detached garage. The revised proposal retains both the native sycamore tree on site and the palm street tree in front of the property.

The discussion below provides an analysis of the revised project in terms of its compliance with the development standards of Title 14, Zoning, and Title 16, Subdivisions, of the Carpinteria Municipal Code (CMC), and with the objectives and policies of the City’s General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan.

Carpinteria Municipal Code (CMC)
CMC Title 14, Zoning
A single-family residence is a permissible use in the PRD-20 district, subject to specific development standards and approval of a Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit by the Planning Commission.

The following table identifies the project’s conformance with applicable Planned Residential Development District and other CMC requirements:

Standard Requirement/Allowance Proposal- 333 Linden Avenue Setbacks
Front 50 feet from centerline of street 60 feet from centerline of street;

Page 349 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 7 ends

Standard Requirement/Allowance Proposal- 333 Linden Avenue (Linden Avenue)
Side
(North)
Side
(South)
Rear
(West)
or 20 feet from property line,
whichever is greater.
5 feet
5 feet
15 feet
20 feet from property line
5 feet
5 feet

24.5 feet
Height 30 feet max. 24.08 feet max.

Building Coverage 50% max. (3,768 square feet) 30.2% (2,277 square feet) Open Space & Landscaping 20% min. (1,507 square feet) 45% (3,401 square feet) Density 20 units/acre (3 units max.) 1 unit
Parking 2 garage spaces 3 garage spaces
Driveway Width 16 feet max. 12 feet
Development Plan Approval
In order to approve a Development Plan for the project, the Planning Commission must make all of the findings for approval provided for in CMC 14.68.030, which are listed below:
a. The proposed development is in conformance with the provisions of the applicable zoning district, Local Coastal Plan and implementation programs, and General Plan. b. The proposed development is sited and designed to avoid risks to life and property due to geologic, flood, or fire hazards and that the proposed density of development is consistent with these objectives.
c. The proposed development will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. d. The proposed development will not conflict with any recorded easements acquired by the public at large for access through the property or use of the property or any easements granted to any public agency or required as a condition of approval. e. The proposed development will not adversely affect necessary community services and values including but not limited to traffic circulation, sewage disposal, fire protection, water supply, and police protection.
f. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, comfort, convenience, property values, or general welfare of the neighborhood.

Staff believes all of the necessary findings can be made. The proposed project is consistent with the type and intensity of development anticipated in urbanized areas of the City’s beach neighborhood.

The project is an in-fill development project resulting in the construction of a new single-family dwelling. With the approval of the requested Lot Line Adjustment, the project would be consistent with all applicable requirements of the City’s General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan and Carpinteria Municipal Code, including Title 14, Zoning. The property is not located in a flood or fire hazard

Page 350 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 8 ends

zone, nor is the project located in an area encumbered with any public easements or sensitive habitats.

Appropriate conditions have been included in the project conditions of approval to address parking, geologic hazards, construction noise, water quality, risk of future sea level rise, and air quality considerations. Additional supporting evidence is provided in the Findings for Approval, included as Attachment A, Exhibit 1 to this report.

Demolition of the Detached Garage at 355 Linden Avenue
The rear wall of the existing detached 912 square-foot garage at 355 Linden Avenue encroaches approximately six inches onto the property at 333 Linden Avenue. During the project review, the applicant team opted to demolish the garage instead of including a re-alignment of that section of the common property line with the Lot Line Adjustment proposal. In the future, under a separate permit application, the applicant team plans to make improvements to the property at 355 Linden Avenue which will likely include a new garage structure. The demolition of the garage, which would result in no covered parking onsite, is permissible under the provisions of AB 2097, which eliminates the requirement for dedicated onsite parking spaces for residential uses within one-half mile of the Amtrak Station. As such, the State law with California Coastal Commission support, supersedes the CMC requirements for residential parking spaces.

CMC Title 16, Subdivision Requirements
Title 16 of the Carpinteria Municipal Code (CMC) regulates land subdivisions, mergers, and lot line adjustments in conformance with the California Subdivision Map Act. For the proposed lot line adjustment, neither a tentative or final parcel map is required pursuant to the exception listed in CMC §16.12.010.E, which states, “A lot line adjustment between two or more existing adjacent parcels [is exempt from the requirements of this Title], where the land taken from one parcel is added to an adjacent parcel, and where a greater number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby created, provided the lot line adjustment is approved by the planning commission.” The proposed lot line adjustment meets this exception as it would result in 2,250 square feet of land taken from the 355 Linden Avenue parcel and added to the adjacent 333 Linden Avenue parcel, and the properties would remain as only two legal lots. The parcel at 355 Linden Avenue would decrease in size from 9,787.5 square feet to 7,537.5 square feet, and the parcel at 333 Linden Avenue would increase in size from 5,287.5 square feet to 7,537.5 square feet. Thus, the lot line adjustment would result in two equally sized parcels that conform to the current 7,000 square-foot minimum lot size for a residential parcel.

Additionally, the maximum density allowed for both parcels combined would remain at a total of six units. The maximum density in the PRD-20 zone district is 20 units per acre. Presently, the 9,787.5 square-foot parcel at 355 Linden Avenue could contain up to four units, and the 5,287.5 square-foot parcel could contain up to two units, for a total of six units. The lot line adjustment would result in two 7,537.5 square-foot parcels, which could contain up to three units each, for a total of six units. As such, the lot line adjustment would not increase the total allowed density.

For more detail, see the attached Lot Line Adjustment Site Plan and Exhibit included in Attachment A, Exhibit 2.

Page 351 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 9 ends

General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan
The project site has a General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan designation of Medium Density Residential (MDR) and is within Design Subarea 1 (Beach Neighborhood) of the Community Design Element and is subject to the following policies:

Land Use Element
Objective LU-3: Preserve the small beach town character of the built environment of Carpinteria, encouraging compatible revitalization and avoiding sprawl development at the City’s edge.

Policy LU-3b: The Community Design Element shall guide the character of development, and represent a comprehensive statement of the community’s visual objectives.

Policy LU-3f: Encourage the remodeling and revitalization of neighborhoods and commercial areas in accordance with principles established in the Community Design Element.

Policy LU-3l: Land use designations established on the City’s land use map that permit a range of residential densities should not be interpreted to permit development that is incompatible with the existing development pattern in an area. A density within the allowable range that is most compatible with the predominant pattern of development in the area should be used as the guide for determining the appropriateness of the proposed development.

The proposed project represents an in-fill development project that would result in a gain of one dwelling unit on a site located in an urbanized, developed part of the City’s beach neighborhood and zoned for a density of up to three units. Such infill projects are generally encouraged by the above-stated Objective and Policies, provided they are developed in a manner that is consistent with the rest of the City’s policies and regulations, as discussed below.

Circulation Element
Policy C-3c: Review new development proposals to improve neighborhood circulation patterns and enhance the inter-neighborhood routing characteristics of the City’s master plan.

Policy C-3h: Require all new projects to demonstrate safe traffic flow integration with the Master Plan of Streets as well as street/drainage improvements function. This shall include construction traffic and the designation of construction routes.

Policy C-8f: Encourage pedestrian movement by providing pedestrian facilities that are direct and convenient, particularly in the beach and downtown areas.

Policy C-9o: Require well-designed walkways as a condition to new development approval.

The site fronts Linden Avenue, which is the primary thoroughfare to the Beach Neighborhood and is heavily traveled by pedestrians and bicyclists. Sidewalks line both sides of the street in this area, and a bike lane runs along the western (southbound) side of Linden Avenue. The revised proposal eliminates the driveway that would have backed-out onto Linden Avenue, thus retaining the existing pedestrian and vehicular traffic patterns on Linden Avenue. The new driveway access from

Page 352 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 10 ends

Dorrance Way would result in head-out egress onto a less busy street, which would allow better visibility for pedestrians and traffic safety.

Open Space, Recreation, & Conservation Element
Policy OSC-7a: Oak trees and oak woodlands, because they are particularly sensitive to environmental conditions, as well as walnut, sycamore, and other native trees, shall be protected through appropriate development standards.

The project site contains a 30-inch diameter Platanus racemosa (Western Sycamore). Through the course of the project design, the applicant has modified the layout of the proposed residence to retain the sycamore tree and protect the critical root zone to the maximum extent feasible. An arborist has prepared a Tree Protection Plan which includes measures to protect the tree and its roots during site preparation and construction (see Sheet TPP0.0 in Attachment A, Exhibit 2). The recommendations included in the Tree Protection Plan have been incorporated into the project conditions of approval.

Likewise, the revised proposal to locate the garage at the rear of the lot and take access from Dorrance Way would allow the existing palm tree along the Linden Avenue frontage to remain in place. While not native, these trees are important to the character and visual setting of Linden Avenue through the downtown and beach neighborhood.

Safety Element
Objective S-4: Minimize the potential risks and reduce the loss of life, property and the economic and social dislocations resulting from flooding.

The project site is not currently located in the designated 100-year floodplain, nor is it proposed be on the forthcoming updated FIRM maps. However, the site is located in an area projected to become increasingly vulnerable to flooding impacts. These vulnerabilities, as discussed above, are liable to become more pronounced in the future as a result of rising sea levels, as discussed in the City’s SLRVAAP, which shows the subject property as being vulnerable to flooding impacts resulting from five-feet or more of sea level rise by 2100.

Although the City’s Interim Sea Level Rise Guidance document does not apply to this site, the City is in the initial stages of crafting updated General Plan/Coastal Plan policies and zoning code standards that will require sea level rise considerations be taken into account for all new development in identified vulnerable areas. The proposed project could voluntarily incorporate SLR adaptation measures (such as using a raised foundation) into the design to reduce potential impacts from SLR that may occur during the economic lifetime of any new development on the site.

Noise Element
Policy N-5c: The City will require that construction activities employ techniques that minimize the noise impacts on adjacent uses.

The City’s standard conditions relating to construction timing and noise attenuation have been included in the attached recommended Conditions of Approval (Attachment A, Exhibit 3).

Page 353 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 11 ends

Citywide Community Design Element Objectives and Policies Objective CD-1: The size, scale and form of buildings on a parcel should be compatible with the adjacent nearby properties and with the dominant neighborhood or district development pattern.

Objective CD-2: Architectural designs based on historic regional building types should be encouraged to preserve and enhance the unique character of the city.

The surrounding neighborhood contains primarily vernacular cottage and Craftsman style residences ranging from one to two stories. A few Spanish/Mediterranean residences are located throughout the Beach Neighborhood, including the residence just north of the project site (355 Linden Avenue). The size, massing, and height of the proposed residence is comparable to other newer two-story structures in the vicinity. Additionally, the height is lower than the adjacent two-story residence to the north, but higher than the adjacent two-story cottage to the south, so the residence would create a “steppeddown” transition between the existing adjacent structures on Linden Avenue.

Objective CD-3: The design of the community should be consistent with the desire to protect views of the mountains and the sea (California Coastal Act of 1976 §30251).

Although views of the ocean and mountains are available from the site, the proposed project would not significantly block any public views as the building footprint, location, and massing are generally in line with adjacent development to the north and south.

Objective CD-5: The streets of neighborhood interiors should be designed to be the “living rooms” of the neighborhood, where children and adults can safely play or walk. The design and details of streets, frontages and buildings should support this objective.

Policy CD-5a: Main entrances to homes should be oriented to the street. Entry elements such as porches, stoops, patios and forecourts are encouraged. Such entry elements should be selected for their compatibility with the adjacent houses and the general neighborhood pattern.

Policy CD-5b: Garages should not dominate views from any public street.

Policy CD-5c: Low walls, low fences and hedges should be encouraged along the frontages to define the edge of the private yard area, where appropriate.

Policy CD-5d: Houses within a neighborhood may vary in materials and style, but strong contrasts in scale, color and roof forms should generally be avoided.

Objective CD-10: Areas with attractive frontages designs should be maintained. New development should be carefully planned with frontage areas, which maintain and enhance the quality of Carpinteria’s streetscape.

Policy CD-10b: Frontages where residential uses abut a major thoroughfare should include buffering elements such as yards, forecourts, courtyards, and tree rows. Sound walls are the most primitive form of buffer and should be used only where other methods are impractical. If sound walls are used they should be attractive and well landscaped.

Page 354 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 12 ends

The proposed site fronts on Linden Avenue, which is the primary thoroughfare to the Beach Neighborhood and is heavily traveled by pedestrians and vehicles. Welcoming features to the proposed unit include large windows, doors, and balconies facing Linden Avenue and a low stucco wall with a wooden gate around the front yard area. Landscaping is proposed along the sidewalk in front of the wall. The revised layout relocated the garage to the rear of the property, so the garage would no longer be highly visible from the street and there would no longer be a driveway interrupting the sidewalk in this area. The low 3.5-foot-tall stucco wall along the property’s frontage could provide some physical buffering from the highly trafficked Linden Avenue right-of-way.

Objective CD-13: Ensure that lighting of new development is sensitive to the character and natural resources of the City and minimizes photo-pollution to the maximum extent feasible.

Policy CD-13b: Lighting shall be low intensity, and located and designed so as to minimize direct view of light sources and diffusers and to minimize halo and spillover effects.

An ornamental sconce is proposed on the front of the residence near the pathway to the entrance.

Additionally, hanging lantern-style exterior lights and landscaping pathway lights are proposed for the new residence, as shown on the colors and materials board and on Sheet A6.0 of the plans in Attachment A, Exhibit 2. The specifications for the exterior light fixtures would be reviewed during Final ARB review for consistency with this Objective and Policy.

Objective CD-14: Protect and preserve natural resources by reducing energy consumption.

Policy CD-14a: To ensure the effective utilization of energy resources, design measures shall be incorporated into project design that allow for development projects to comply with and exceed the minimum energy requirements of the City’s Uniform Codes.

CD-14-Implementation Policy 7: Building orientation shall be designed to maximize natural lighting and passive solar heating and cooling.

CD-14-Implementation Policy 8: Landscaping shall be designed to maximize the use of native drought-tolerant species and deciduous trees to shade buildings in summer and allow for passive solar heating in winter.

Any development on this site would be required to, at minimum, comply with current building and Title 24 code requirements for energy efficiency and conservation measures, including roof-mounted solar panels. Future site landscaping would be expected to comply with the applicable design policies and water conservation requirements promoting the use of low water use, native or locally adapted species.

Subarea 1 (Beach Neighborhood) Objectives and Policies
Objective CDS1-2: Enhance the pedestrian character of the neighborhood streets.

Objective CDS1-3: Ensure that the scale and character of new development is consistent with the existing small-scale character of the residential neighborhood and that it is consistent with the neighborhood “small beach town” image. Discourage new development of large, “boxy” buildings, with ground floors primarily devoted to garages.

Page 355 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 13 ends

CDS1-Implementation Policy 1: New buildings should discourage the ground floor being dominated by garage doors or “boxy” building design.

CDS1-Implementation Policy 2: To avoid blank ground floor facades that discourage pedestrian life on the street, the ground floors of the residence should be between one and five feet in height above the public sidewalk, unless a greater height is mandated by flood prevention policies.

CDS1-Implementation Policy 4: No more than 50 percent of the facade width should be occupied by garage doors.

CDS1-Implementation Policy 5: The front door should face the street. Pedestrian-oriented transitional spaces should be provided from the public sidewalk to the front door. Such spaces may include landscaped front yards, landscaped and/or hardscaped forecourts, and raised front porches and dooryards. These spaces should be designed to accommodate uses such as children’s play areas and/or sitting areas.

CDS1-Implementation Policy 7: To create a picturesque skyline, visible pitched roofs are recommended, rather than flat roofs with parapets or mansard fascias. On three-story elements, visible pitched roofs should be required to prevent the buildings from “walling off’ the beach from the town.

CDS1-Implementation Policy 8: Building articulation is encouraged: e.g., balconies, bay windows, dormers, porches and pergolas.

CDS1-Implementation Policy 10: New buildings on streets with existing one-story bungalows should include porches and other one-story elements that are compatible in scale and spacing with the existing development.

The proposed residence design would be articulated with plate heights ranging from 7.5- to 9.5-feet, a combination of gable, hip, and shed roofs, with portions of the elevations “popped-out” and stepped back in various locations. The second story balconies add further depth to the proposal. A 3.5-foottall stucco wall with a wooden gate and landscaping would separate the private front yard area from the street. The lower-level finished floor would be approximately eight-inches above existing grade.

The design of the proposed residence consists of varying one- and two-story elements, to avoid a “boxy” building design. The project has been redesigned in response to the Planning Commissions previous comments with a detached three-car garage at the rear of the property, with access from Dorrance Way. As such, the project now complies with Implementation Policy 4, above.

Beach Neighborhood Residential Design Guidelines
DG 1: The primary dwelling should not be located beyond a side yard encroachment plane defined as follows: a 15-degree angle measured from the vertical at a point beginning six feet above the existing grade along the interior side property line(s). For street side yards, the standard setback shall be applied. Encroachments consistent with those defined in CMC Section 14.50.070, General Yard Regulations, (i.e., sills, belt courses, buttresses, cornices, chimneys, eaves, ornamental features and uncovered landings) are permitted.

Page 356 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 14 ends

The proposed residence does not encroach into the side yard encroachment plane, so the proposal is compliant with DG 1. Please see the left side of the East Elevation on Sheet A3.1 of the plans in Attachment A, Exhibit 2.

DG 2: New or modified buildings should be compatible with surrounding buildings and with the character of the Beach Neighborhood. The small beach town charm should be reflected in the scale and form of the building.

The proposed size, bulk, and scale of the revised residence appear to be generally similar to and compatible with surrounding newer homes and buildings in the Beach Neighborhood, and the second story plate heights and overall height have been reduced to better relate to the immediately adjacent residences. The Spanish/Mediterranean architectural style is not common in the Beach Neighborhood, however the variety of architectural styles, massing, and colors/materials helps to define the Beach Neighborhood’s “small beach town” character.

DG 3: Buildings should be composed of varying masses. Variety in the shape, scale and design of buildings is encouraged throughout the neighborhood.

DG 4: For single family dwellings, the second story should comprise not more than 40% of the total building square footage (including garages).

DG 5: Second floor frontages should be stepped in at least three feet from the ground floor façade in order to maintain single story elements along the street frontage and reduce the prominence of second floors.

DG 7: Maximum building heights over 26 feet for two-story structures are discouraged.

The massing of the proposed residence is variegated between the one- and two-story portions, in addition to the second story balconies. The proposal complies with DG 4 with the second story at

35.3% of the total square footage. The proposed second-story is stepped back 18.5-feet from the lower ground floor façade, so the proposal complies with DG 5. The maximum height of the proposed residence would be 24.08-feet, so the proposal is compliant with DG 7.

DG 10: Building facades longer than 20 feet should incorporate design features such as large, r windows or off-set wall planes.

The proposed front and rear façades are 35-feet wide, and the sides are longer. The elevations incorporate off-set wall planes, varying plate heights, a variety of window sizes and shapes, a stone wrap around the front of the residence, stone accent walls, and wooden trellis accents. The façades of the detached garage would be articulated with wooden garage doors, windows, doors, and an accent stone wrap around the base. These elements appear to meet the intention of DG 10.

DG 12: Large roof masses should be avoided. Roofs should feature varied and articulated roof planes, which may include but are not limited to front-facing gables, cross gables or hipped roofs.

Flat roofs and side-facing gables are discouraged.

As discussed previously, the proposed roof incorporates front-and rear-facing gables, small open gables over the pop-outs along the sides, and a shed roofs above the front living room and primary

Page 357 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 15 ends

bath windows. The detached garage would have a hipped roof. These variations break up the roof mass and appear to comply with the intention of DG 12. A roof plan with more information on the roof design and layout can be found on Sheet A2.2 of the enclosed plans in Attachment A, Exhibit 2.

DG 13: Frontages that include porches and/or yards where residents may sit or interact with the public realm are encouraged. A boundary such as a landscape feature between the public realm (i.e., the street or sidewalk) and the private realm (the private property) may exist, but not in a manner that prevents the desired interaction.

DG 15: Dwellings should include a pathway separate from the driveway to lead pedestrians from the front door to the street or sidewalk.

The front yard would be surrounded by a proposed 3.5-foot-tall stucco wall with a wooden gate for access. The gate would open from Linden Avenue into the front yard area. The low wall and gate would create an open feeling between the public and private spaces. The former garage area at the front of the residence has been repurposed as a living room with a large bank of windows facing the street, and features a large balcony above on the second floor. The main entry to the home faces Linden Avenue, but is set back farther into the lot interior and accessed by a decorative walkway from the front door.

DG 17: Garages and driveways should not dominate the habitable frontage of the dwelling.

Garages that are placed out of view (such as detached garages placed at the rear of a lot) and accessed via a driveway or alley are preferred. Garages included as part of the frontage design are acceptable but should include measures to reduce their prominence (see DG 18).

DG 18: Garage design may include windows, trellises, separate doors, decorative trim and other architectural elements to enhance the aesthetics of the garage. When placed at the front of a house, garages should be set back from the main frontage and entry.

As discussed above, the project has been redesigned with a detached three-car garage located at the rear of the property with access via an easement from Dorrance Way, as preferred by DG 17. The garage has been designed with three separate wooden doors and a stone wrap around the base to break up the elevation. The garage wall that faces the residence would have two sets of sliding doors.

The roof over the garage and sliding doors would be detailed with exposed wooden beams, rafter tails, and supports. These elements enhance the aesthetics of the detached garage as described in DG 18, above, and architecturally relate to the design and detailing of the primary residence.

DG 20: The selected architectural style should include the primary identifying features indicative of that style.

DG 21: Elements such as windows and doors should be consistent in design with the architectural style, and when appropriate, should draw from elements in the existing neighborhood.

DG 22: Bay windows, dormers, balconies, covered porches and other decorative elements are encouraged when appropriate to the architecture of a building, particularly when these elements are oriented toward a public street, public space or open space.

Page 358 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 16 ends

DG 23: Fenestration should be provided to add architectural interest when facades are visible from the public realm.

DG 24: Exterior architectural detail and treatment should be carried around all sides of the building.

DG 25: Muted tones are encouraged or other colors determined to be appropriate by the Architectural Review Board.

DG 26: Second floor balconies, windows and decks that are oriented toward the public realm are preferred. When these features face adjacent private properties, they should be located and designed to protect privacy.

The proposed design incorporates white stucco walls, a red tile roof, and exposed wooden beams with rafter tails, all of which are trademark features of the Spanish/Mediterranean architectural style. The architectural details, including stucco scallops along the roof edges, stone accents, wooden doors and gates, and lanterns are fine details that further embellish the quality of the design. The front second story balcony over the living room would primarily overlook the street and would be located approximately 16-feet away from the northerly neighboring residence, which is also two stories and located towards the street. The smaller front second story balcony would overlook the front entry and would be set back approximately 60-feet from the nearest adjacent neighbor, so minimal privacy impacts are anticipated. Lastly, the rear second story balcony would overlook the courtyard, detached garage, and rear driveway.

DG 27: Trees, shrubs and other low plantings should be compatible with the surrounding landscape and urban form. Plantings should include native or drought-tolerant species and trees that complement the public realm. Native species are encouraged where appropriate.

DG 29: Landscaping should allow visibility of the building and complement its architecture, without hindering privacy or causing excessive shading or leaf litter on adjacent lots.

DG 30: Hardscape materials should complement the building and be distinguishable from materials used in the public realm. Hardscape that incorporates varied materials, textures and designs is encouraged.

DG 31: Permeable materials are encouraged for all driveways and parking areas to reduce runoff.

The proposed landscape/hardscape plan has been prepared to work around the existing sycamore tree.

The hardscape materials include permeable pavers for a portion of the front yard, north side pathway, courtyard, and driveway areas. The front walkway, balance of the front yard, and south side pathway would be flagstone. The area near the trunk of the sycamore tree, would be gravel mulch.

Landscaping includes fruitless olive trees with flowering shrubs and grasses in the front, side hedges, fruitless olive trees with planters in the courtyard, and a ribbon driveway. Shrubs would be planted around the perimeter of the site with planters in front of the wall along Linden Avenue to provide a buffer along the street frontage.

DG 32: Exposed walls should be finished with stone, stucco or other aesthetic treatment.

Page 359 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 17 ends

DG 33: Fences should be finished on both sides to create a uniform appearance as viewed from either side.

DG 34: Along street frontages, open fence types such as picket, wrought iron or post and rail are preferred. Chain-link and solid fencing materials are discouraged but if they are used, should be screened with landscaping to the height of the top of the fence or wall.

As discussed previously, a new 3.5-foot-tall stucco wall with a wooden gate is proposed to enclose the front yard area. This style of wall is consistent with the proposed Spanish/Mediterranean style of architecture for the residence. A landscaped planter is proposed in front of the wall to provide screening and softening.

DG 36: Outdoor lighting should include:
• Fully shielded fixtures positioned so that light is not visible above the horizontal plane of the fixture;
• Motion sensor and timers to keep lights off when not in use; • Energy efficient light types with low watts and lumens; • Fewest number of fixtures possible at minimum heights necessary; and • Cutoffs for fixtures to prevent spillover onto neighboring properties.

The proposed plans show a sconce and specify hanging-lantern fixtures and pathway lights to provide exterior lighting. The proposed conditions of approval require that the ARB review the specifications for the proposed exterior lighting for compliance with the above measure and the City’s general night-sky friendly lighting policies.

Housing Element
Program Category #1. Make Sites Available to Accommodate the RHNA.

Goals:
• Maintain an adequate supply of appropriately zoned land and take all necessary actions to support the production of at least 901 housing units in the City to accommodate the RHNA allocation for the 2023-2031 period.
• Maintain a jobs-housing balance or ratio within the 0.75 to 1.25 range suggested by the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments.

Policies:
• Adequate Sites: Provide and maintain sufficient sites in the General Plan and Zoning Code and associated Land Use and Zoning Maps to accommodate the housing needs allocated to the City in the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Plan. • Housing Types: In the General Plan and implementing ordinances, provide for a mix of housing types consistent with the City’s needs, including single-family detached and multifamily housing. • Accessory Dwelling Units: Promote the development of ADUs consistent with State law and City regulations.
• Public Services and Facilities: Ensure that public services and facilities have the capacity to support the need for the new residential development allocated to the City by the RHNA Plan.

Page 360 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 18 ends

The proposal would provide a four-bedroom single-family dwelling, which is one of the types of housing that has been identified as needed within the City. The project would result in a gain of one new housing unit for the RHNA.

VI. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
A series of ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Council require the payment of various development impact fees (DIFs). If the project were approved as submitted, it would be subject to the fees as shown in the following tables. The amounts shown are estimates only. The actual amounts will be calculated in accordance with the fee resolutions in effect when the fees are paid. The fees are updated annually in July.

The developer of a project that is required to pay development impact fees may apply to the City Council for a reduction, adjustment or waiver of any of those fees based on the absence of any reasonable relationship or nexus between the impacts of the proposed development and either the amount of the fee(s) charged or the type of facilities to be financed. The application must be in writing and must be submitted to the city clerk either ten days prior to the public hearing on the development permit for the project, or if no development permit is required, at the time of building permit application.

Estimated Development Impact Fees
For one new single-family residential unit, based on 3,520 square-feet of new habitable area.

Fee Type Fee Per Square-Foot
Unless noted otherwise
Total Fee
Streets and Thoroughfares $0.12 $422.40
Highway Interchanges & Bridges $1.68 $5,913.60
Traffic Control Facilities $0.20 $704.00
General Facilities & Equipment $0.95 $3,344.00
Storm Drainage Facilities $1.78 $6,265.60
Quimby/Parkland Acquisition n/a n/a
Parks and Recreational Facilities $5.63 $19,817.60
Aquatics Facilities $0.34 $1,196.80
TOTAL DIFs $37,664.00

Page 361 of 523 ends

23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB Coeler New Residence
PC Hearing Date: June 1, 2026

Page 19 ends

Other Estimated Fees
Fee Type Fee Per Unit
Unless noted otherwise
Total Fee
Carp.-Summerland Fire District
Fire Mitigation Fee
Fire Protection Certificate
$3,261.59
$229.00
$3,261.59
$229.00
Carpinteria Sanitary District
Development Impact Fee
Sewer Service Charge
$6,746.00
$800.70/unit/yr.
$6,746.00
$800.70/yr.

School District
Residential (habitable area) $3.48/sq. ft. $12,249.60
New Construction Tax $500.00 $500.00
Landscape Bond $500.00 or $0.03/sq. ft. $500.00
TOTAL Other Fees $24,286.89
VII. ACTION OPTIONS

1. Adopt Resolution No. PC-26-001, thereby approving Project 23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB to construct a new 3,520 square foot two-story single-family residence with a detached 840 square foot three-car garage and adjust the lot line with the adjacent property at 355 Linden Avenue; and accept the CEQA Notice of Exemption; and adopt the Findings for Approval in Attachment A, Exhibit 1 and Conditions of Approval as proposed in Attachment A, Exhibit 3. (Staff’s recommendation)

2. Direct the applicant to prepare project revisions and return to the next Commission meeting.

3. Conceptually deny the project as proposed. Direct staff to return with findings for denial to the Planning Commission’s next meeting.

VIII. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A Resolution PC-26-001
Exhibit 1 – Findings for Approval
Exhibit 2 – Plan Set
Exhibit 3 – Recommended Conditions of Approval
Attachment B Story Pole Photographs
Attachment C Minutes from the December 15, 2022, May 1, 2025, and November 13, 2025 ARB Meetings
Attachment D Architectural Plans from the February 2, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting (Superseded)
Attachment E Minutes from the February 2, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting Attachment F CEQA Notice of Exemption

Page 362 of 523 ends

Attachment A
Resolution PC-26-001
Coeler New Residence
23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB
June 1, 2026

Page 363 of 523 ends

RESOLUTION NO. PC-26-001
Coeler New Residence, June 1, 2026

Page 1 ends

RESOLUTION NO. PC-26-001

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CARPINTERIA PLANNING COMMISSION

APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, AND
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR PROJECT 23-2232-

DP/LLA/CDP/ARB FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY

RESIDENCE WITH A DETACHED GARAGE, AND ADJUST THE LOT LINE WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY AT 355 LINDEN AVENUE. THE
PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 333 & 355 LINDEN AVENUE
(APNs 003-440-027 & -028), REQUESTED BY DYLAN CHAPPELL.

WHEREAS, the Carpinteria Planning Commission has considered an application for a Development Plan, Lot Line Adjustment, and Coastal Development Permit filed by Dylan Chappell, Architect, on behalf of Peter and Barbara Coeler on July 13, 2023, to construct a new 3,520 square foot two-story single-family residence with a detached 840 square foot two-car garage and adjust the lot line with the adjacent property at 355 Linden Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the application was subsequently deemed complete and accepted by the City as being consistent with the applicable submittal requirements on February 13, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City of Carpinteria Architectural Review Board considered the proposed project at their December 15, 2022, May 1, 2025, and November 13, 2025 meetings, wherein the project was recommended for preliminary approval; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and received evidence regarding the application, and requested revisions to the project on February 2, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the project returned to the Planning Commission on May 4, 2026, and the applicant requested a continuance to the June 1, 2026 Planning Commission meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a noticed public hearing and received evidence regarding the application for the Development Plan, Lot Line Adjustment, and Coastal Development Permit; and
WHEREAS, the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Guidelines Sections 15303 (new construction or conversion of small structures); 15304 (minor alterations to land); 15305 (minor alterations in land use limitations); and 15332 (in-fill development projects); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the policies of the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan and the Zoning Code standards that are relevant to the project.

Page 364 of 523 ends

RESOLUTION NO. PC-26-001
Coeler New Residence, June 1, 2026

Page 2 ends

NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Development Plan, Lot Line Adjustment, and Coastal Development Permit are approved, making the Findings for approval outlined in Exhibit 1;

2. The Notice of Exemption prepared for the project is accepted as having satisfied the requirements of CEQA; and

3. The Development Plan, Lot Line Adjustment, and Coastal Development Permit consistent with the plans shown in Exhibit 2 are approved subject to the project conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit 3.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of June 2026, by the following called vote:

AYES: Commissioners:

NOES: Commissioner(s):

ABSENT: Commissioner(s):

ABSTAIN: Commissioner(s):
__________________________
John Moyer, Chair
ATTEST:
________________________
Nick Bobroff, Secretary
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carpinteria held the 1st day of June 2026.

Page 365 of 523 ends

Attachment A
Exhibit 1:

Findings for Approval
Coeler New Residence
23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB
June 1, 2026

Page 366 of 523 ends

FINDINGS OF APPROVAL, PC RESOLUTION 26-001
Coeler New Residence, June 1, 2026

Page 1 ends

ATTACHMENT A
EXHIBIT 1: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL

CITY OF CARPINTERIA PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
PROJECT NO. 23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB
JUNE 1, 2026

COELER NEW RESIDENCE & LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
333 & 355 LINDEN AVENUE

REQUESTED BY DYLAN CHAPPELL

FINDINGS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE, LOCAL COASTAL PLAN, GENERAL PLAN, AND TITLE 14 OF THE CARPINTERIA MUNICIPAL CODE

1.0 Administrative Findings
The Planning Commission hereby incorporates by reference as though set forth in full all Community Development Department staff reports and attachments thereto presented to the Planning Commission and all comments made or received either orally or in writing at the public hearings on this project.

1.1 Procedures
Pursuant to the California Coastal Act, the Administrative Regulations of the California Coastal Commission and the City’s Local Coastal Program, it has been found that the process for public review of the subject Development Plan and Local Coastal Development Permit has been properly conducted as follows:
a. An application for a Development Plan, Lot Line Adjustment and Coastal Development Permit was submitted on July 13, 2023, and deemed complete and accepted by the City as being consistent with the applicable submittal requirements on February 13, 2025. Said application and all related material have been available for public review at City offices since the date of submittal.
b. The application has been evaluated and found to conform to the applicable zone district and to be consistent with the City’s Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan, the Interpretive Guidelines of the Coastal Commission and the California Coastal Act.
c. The project has been reviewed by the City’s Architectural Review Board at duly noticed public meetings which included, but is not limited to, mailed notice to all property owners within 300 feet and occupants within 100 feet of the subject property.

Page 367 of 523 ends

FINDINGS OF APPROVAL, PC RESOLUTION 26-001
Coeler New Residence, June 1, 2026

Page 2 ends

d. The project has been reviewed by the City’s Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing which included, but is not limited to, mailed notice to all property owners within 300 feet and all occupants within 100 feet of the subject property and publication in the local newspaper, the Coastal View News.

1.2 California Environmental Quality Act
The Planning Commission finds that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15303 (new construction or conversion of small structures); 15304 (minor alterations to land); 15305 (minor alterations in land use limitations); and 15332 (in-fill development projects) of the Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act as the project includes only the construction of a new single-family dwelling with a detached garage, associated grading and landscaping, and a minor lot line adjustment that does not result in the creation of a new parcel, on a lot in an urbanized part of the City with no habitat value and with access to all necessary services and utilities.

1.3 Development Plan Findings
Pursuant to Carpinteria Municipal Code §14.68.030(9), the Planning Commission shall determine that all of the following criteria have been met prior to approving or approving with conditions a Development Plan:

1. The proposed development is in conformance with the provisions of the applicable zoning district, Local Coastal Plan and implementation programs, and General Plan.

As presented in the staff report prepared for the Planning Commission hearing of June 1, 2026, and herein incorporated by reference, the project involves the construction of a new two-story single-family dwelling with a detached garage pursuant to Chapter 14.14, Planned Residential Development (PRD), and a minor lot line adjustment pursuant to Title 16, Subdivisions, of the City’s Municipal Code. The project has also been found to be consistent with the General Plan’s applicable Land Use and Community Design Element Objectives and Policies in that the project involves the construction of a new single family dwelling and that fits within the “small beach town” character of the neighborhood and the established surrounding development pattern relative to architectural style, overall size and scale, front setback distances, its pedestrian-scaled design and its decorative architectural elements consistent with the Spanish/Mediterranean style. The project has also been found to be consistent with the applicable objectives and policies of the Circulation, Open Space, Recreation, & Conservation, Safety, Noise, and Housing Elements.

2. The proposed development is sited and designed to avoid risks to life and property due to geologic, flood, or fire hazards and that the proposed density of development is consistent with these objectives.

Page 368 of 523 ends

FINDINGS OF APPROVAL, PC RESOLUTION 26-001
Coeler New Residence, June 1, 2026

Page 3 ends

The subject parcel is not located within a known geologic, floodplain, or fire hazard zone. The property is not in an area presently subject to the requirements of the City’s Interim Sea Level Rise Guidance document for new- or re-development. The proposed density is within the limits defined within the City’s zoning district and land use designation.

3. The proposed development will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

The site does not contain any environmentally sensitive habitat area nor does the project have the ability to impact fish or wildlife as it involves the construction of one new residential unit within a developed urban neighborhood. An existing native sycamore tree would be preserved on the project site. There are no known other sensitive resources, native vegetation or specimen trees that would be impacted as a result of this project. Appropriate conditions of approval are included to address and avoid potential construction-related impacts to air quality, water quality, and noise. A condition has also been included requiring adherence to the requirements of the Tree Protection Plan for the preserved-in-place sycamore tree.

4. The proposed development will not conflict with any recorded easements acquired by the public at large for access through the property or use of the property or any easements granted to any public agency or required as a condition of approval.

There are no known recorded easements on the property for public access or public utilities. No new public easements are required of the project as a condition of approval. A new private non-exclusive access easement is proposed to provide access from Dorrance Way to the new residence. The project has been reviewed and conditionally approved by the Carpinteria-Summerland Fire Protection District, Carpinteria Sanitary District and Carpinteria Valley Water District.

5. The proposed development will not adversely affect necessary community services and values including but not limited to traffic circulation, sewage disposal, fire protection, water supply, and police protection.

The project does not have the potential to adversely affect these services in that these services are currently available to the property and for the surrounding residences located throughout the neighborhood. The proposed new single-family residence would not place an additional demand on community services significant enough to adversely affect the availability of these services. Agencies potentially affected by this project have been notified and have indicated an ability to serve the project.

6. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, comfort, convenience, property values, or general welfare of the neighborhood.

Page 369 of 523 ends

FINDINGS OF APPROVAL, PC RESOLUTION 26-001
Coeler New Residence, June 1, 2026

Page 4 ends

The project involves the construction of a new single-family residence with a detached garage within an urbanized, residential part of the City. The proposed structure is compatible with the surrounding development in terms of size, bulk, scale, architectural style and placement on the lot and with the City’s desire to preserve and enhance the “small beach town” character of the Downtown Beach Neighborhood as noted in the staff report presented to the Planning Commission, dated June 1, 2026. The demolition of the detached garage at 355 Linden Avenue to remedy the encroachment onto the property at 333 Linden Avenue is permissible under the provisions of AB 2097, and the area of the demolished garage would remain as an open area for onsite uncovered parking.

1.4 Lot Line Adjustment Finding
Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and Title 16 of the Carpinteria Municipal Code, it has been found that the Lot Line Adjustment requested may be issued based on the following finding:

1. A lot line adjustment between four or fewer existing adjoining parcels, where the land taken from one parcel is added to an adjoining parcel, and where a greater number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby created, if the lot line adjustment is approved by the local agency, or advisory agency. A local agency or advisory agency shall limit its review and approval to a determination of whether or not the parcels resulting from the lot line adjustment will conform to the local general plan, any applicable specific plan, any applicable coastal plan, and zoning and building ordinances. An advisory agency or local agency shall not impose conditions or exactions on its approval of a lot line adjustment except to conform to the local general plan, any applicable specific plan, any applicable coastal plan, and zoning and building ordinances, to require the prepayment of real property taxes prior to the approval of the lot line adjustment, or to facilitate the relocation of existing utilities, infrastructure, or easements. No tentative map, parcel map, or final map shall be required as a condition to the approval of a lot line adjustment. The lot line adjustment shall be reflected in a deed, which shall be recorded. No record of survey shall be required for a lot line adjustment unless required by Section 8762 of the Business and Professions Code.

The proposed lot line adjustment is between two legal lots and would result in 2,250 square feet of land taken from the 355 Linden Avenue parcel and added to the adjacent 333 Linden Avenue parcel, and the properties would remain as only two legal lots. The parcel at 355 Linden Avenue would decrease in size from 9,787.5 square feet to 7,537.5 square feet, and the parcel at 333 Linden Avenue would increase in size from 5,287.5 square feet to 7,537.5 square feet. The adjusted parcels would be consistent with the City’s Local Coastal Plan/General Plan and the Carpinteria Municipal Code. Therefore, this finding can be made.

Page 370 of 523 ends

FINDINGS OF APPROVAL, PC RESOLUTION 26-001
Coeler New Residence, June 1, 2026

Page 5 ends

1.5 Coastal Development Permit Finding
Pursuant to the California Coastal Act, the Administrative Regulations of the California Coastal Commission and the City’s Local Coastal Program, it has been found that the permit requested may be issued based on the following findings:

1. The proposed development is in conformity with the City’s certified Local Coastal Program.

The project involves the construction of a new two-story single-family dwelling with a detached garage pursuant to Chapter 14.14, Planned Residential Development, and a minor lot line adjustment pursuant to Title 16, Subdivisions, of the City’s Municipal Code. Based on the City’s Coastal Land Use Plan (CLUP), this type of use has been anticipated.

An analysis of the project’s conformity with the Objectives and Policies of the City’s certified Local Coastal Program is presented in the staff report prepared for the Planning Commission hearing of June 1, 2026, and herein incorporated by reference.

The Land Use and Community Design Elements of the City’s General Plan encourage new development that is compatible with the existing surrounding development and maintains and enhances the City’s “small beach town” charm. Consistent with the applicable objectives and policies of the General Plan, the residence would be of a size, scale, architectural style, layout, and placement on the lot that fits the desired vision for the Downtown Beach Neighborhood. The project has also been found to be consistent with the applicable objectives and policies of the Circulation, Open Space, Recreation, & Conservation, Safety, Noise, and Housing Elements of the City’s General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan. Therefore, this finding can be made.

Page 371 of 523 ends

Attachment A
Exhibit 2:

Reduced Plan Set
Coeler New Residence
23-2232-DP/LLA/CDP/ARB
June 1, 2026

Page 372 of 523 ends

PROJECT ADDRESS

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

LOT AREA
ZONE

OCCUPANCY

BUILDING TYPE

CONSTRUCTION TYPE

FIRE HAZARD

FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED
SLOPE

MAX BUILDING HEIGHT

SETBACKS

PARKING

PROJECT INFORMATION
333 LINDEN AVE

GOVERNING AGENCY

CITY OF CARPINTERIA
333 LINDEN AVE
CARPINTERIA, CA 93013
003-440-028
7,537.5 SQ. FT.

PRD-20
R-3, U
SFR
V-B
NO
YES
2%
30'
FRONT: 50' FROM CL OF STREET or 20', SIDE 5' REAR: 15'

SCOPE OF WORK

VICINITY MAP
2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE PROTECTION CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE

CODE COMPLIANCE

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. THE FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE FEATURES THAT MUST BE FIELD

VERIFIED BY A CERTIFIED HERS RATER AS A CONDITION FOR MEETING THE MODELED ENERGY PERFORMANCE FOR THE T-24 ANALYSIS:

MINIMUM AIRFLOW

VERIFIED EER / SEER

VERIFIED REFRIGERATION CHARGE

FAN EFFICIENCY WATTS/ CFM

DUCT LEAKAGE TESTING

SPECIAL INSPECTIONS

SHEET INDEX
OWNER

PROJECT TEAM

ARCHITECT DYLAN CHAPPELL

DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS
PO BOX 8291
MAMMOTH LAKES, CA 93546

SQUARE FOOTAGE EXISTING (SF) PROPOSED (SF)

NET GROSS NET GROSS

BUILDING FOOTPRINT (LOT COVERAGE)

LOT COVERAGE DATA
SITE

PERMEABLE PAVERS

PROJECT AREAS
A NEW TWO STORY SFR OF 3,520 SQ. FT. WITH A DETACHED THREE CAR GARAGE OF 840 SQ. FT. THERE WILL BE ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND SITE WORK.

GENERAL
G1.0 TITLE SHEET
G2.0 SITE PHOTOS
TPPO.O TREE PROTECTION PLAN
CIVIL
C0.0 SURVEY

ARCHITECTURAL
A1.0 SITE PLAN
A2.0 1ST FLOOR PLAN
A2.1 2ND FLOOR PLAN
A2.2 ROOF PLANS
A3.0 ELEVATIONS
A4.0 SECTIONS
A6.0 DETAILS

LANDSCAPE
L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN
E

IA N R OF
I
OF
C
A
L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D
A
R
E

SNECI L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
G1.0

TITLE SHEET

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -PLANNING COMMISSION SET 03-23-2026

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: SEE SHEET S1 (STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION

PROGRAM) FOR REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS

CITY OF CARPINTERIA MUNICIPAL CODE

1. ADDRESS NUMBERS: APPROVED ADDRESS NUMBERS, BUILDING NUMBERS OR

APPROVED BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SHALL BE PLACED IN A POSITION THAT IS

PLAINLY LEGIBLE AND VISIBLE FROM THE STREET, ROAD, ALLEY, AND WALKWAYS GIVING ACCESS TO AND WITHIN THE PROPERTY. THESE NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND. ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL BE ARABIC NUMERALS OR ALPHABET LETTERS. NUMBERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES (102MM) HIGH WITH A MINIMUM STROKE WIDTH OF 0.5 INCH (12.7 MM)

AND SHALL BE ILLUMINATED IN AN APPROVED MANNER (IF NUMBERS ARE ON THE EXTERIOR). NUMBER HEIGHT AND STROKE WIDTH SHALL BE INCREASED AS NEEDED FOR LEGIBILITY BASED ON VISIBILITY DISTANCE.

2. SMOKE ALARM/DETECTORS: SMOKE ALARM/DETECTORS SHALL BE WIRED TO

THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, BE EQUIPPED WITH BATTERY BACKUP, AND EMIT A SIGNAL WHEN BATTERIES ARE LOW. SMOKE ALARMS SHALL BE

INTERCONNECTED, SO THAT THE ACTIVATION OF ONE ALARM WILL ACTIVATE ALL OTHER ALARMS.

3. CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM/DETECTORS: SHALL COMPLY WITH UL2034 AND BE

INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE AND CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 17926. CARBON MONOXIDE

ALARM/DETECTORS SHALL BE WIRED TO THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL SYSTEM AND BE EQUIPPED WITH BATTERY BACKUP. CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL

BE INTERCONNECTED, SO THAT THE ACTIVATION OF ONE ALARM WILL ACTIVATE

ALL OTHER ALARMS

FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES

1. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY

OR WITHIN A CITY EASEMENT, THE APPLICANT SHALL APPLY FOR AND

OBTAIN AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FROM THE CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION (CITY PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTORS REQUIRE 48-HOUR NOTICE FOR INSPECTION).

2. STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL NOT DISCHARGE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION

SITE TO THE CITY STREETS OR MUNICIPAL STORM DRAIN SYSTEM WITHOUT TREATMENT BY A SUITABLE POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE. STORM WATER

RUNOFF DISCHARGES WITHOUT TREATMENT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CITY'S STORM WATER RUNOFF ORDINANCE. DISCHARGING ANY MATERIAL OTHER

THAN UNCONTAMINATED STORM WATER RUNOFF TO THE CITY STREETS OR

TO THE MUNICIPAL STORM DRAIN SYSTEM IS PROHIBITED AND IS A VIOLATION OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE.

SITE MANAGER TO CONTACT:

NAME:

PHONE:

LAND DEVELOPMENT NOTES

GENERAL PLAN

FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION
X

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
3 GARAGE SPACES PROVIDED

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 24'-1"

LANDSCAPE

PROPOSED (SF)
7,537.5
1ST FLOOR [LC]

DETACHED GARAGE

HARDSCAPE ( IMPERVIOUS)
GRADING STATS:

REQUIRED BY OVER EXCAVATION AND RECOMPACTION
667 CY CUT, 667 CY FILL, 67 CY IMPORT

“FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT”

UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT

1. FIRE SPRINKLERS

2. ALL WORK IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE COMPLETED UNDER SEPARATE PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT.

BIRDSEYE VIEW
2ND FLOOR

HOUSE TOTAL
100%

MAX LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED

14.14.060 - BUILDING SETBACKS.

1. FRONT. NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN FIFTY FEET

OF THE CENTERLINE OF ANY STREET NOR TWENTY FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.

2. SIDE. THERE SHALL BE A SIDE YARD SETBACK ON EACH SIDE OF THE PARCEL

OF NO LESS THAN FIVE FEET NOR MORE THAN TEN FEE

3. REAR. THERE SHALL BE A REAR YARD SETBACK OF NO LESS THAN FIFTEEN FEET.
(ORD. 315 § 1 (PART), 1981)

14.14.070 - DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS.

NO BUILDING SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSER TO THE OPPOSING WALLS OF

ANOTHER BUILDING CONTAINING DWELLING UNITS ON THE PROPERTY THAN ONE-HALF THE SUM OF THE HEIGHTS OF BOTH SUCH BUILDINGS. THE DISTANCE

BETWEEN TWO SUCH ADJACENT BUILDINGS SO LOCATED THAT THE WALLS OF

ONE BUILDING DO NOT FACE THE WALLS OF THE OTHER BUILDING SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN TEN FEET. (ORD. 315 § 1 (PART), 1981)

14.14.080 - BUILDING COVERAGE.

NO MORE THAN FIFTY PERCENT OF THE NET AREA OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE COVERED WITH ANY PORTION OF A BUILDING(S) CONTAINING DWELLING UNITS. (ORD. 315 § 1 (PART), 1981)

FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES

ARTISTIC RENDERING
2,277
1,243
3,520
840
1ST FLOOR COVERED PORCH
2ND FLOOR BALCONIES 463
2,350 31%
3,769 50% 0 0%
3,063 41%
1,963 26%
12716 RIVERSIDE DRIVE
VALLEY VILLAGE, CA 91607

PETER AND BARBARA COOLER

PB LIVING TRUST

FEMA FIRM

STORMWATER
Stormwater Control Plan for Small (Tier1) Projects
Tier 1 Stormwater Control Plan Project Data
[Complete all fields]
Project Name / Case File Number
Project Location
[Street Address if available, or intersection and/or APN] Name of Owner or Developer
Project Type and Description
[Examples: “Single Family Residence,” “Parking Lot
Addition,” “Retail and Parking”]
Total New Impervious Surface Area (square feet)
[Sum of currently pervious areas that will be covered
with new impervious surfaces]
Total Replaced Impervious Surface Area
[Sum of currently impervious areas that will be covered with new impervious surfaces.]
Total Pre-Project Impervious Surface Area
Total Post-Project Impervious Surface Area
Runoff Reduction Measure(s) Selected
(Check one or more)
❑ 1. Disperse runoff from roofs or
pavement to vegetated area
❑ 2. Permeable pavement ❑ 3. Cisterns or Rain Barrels ❑ 4. Bioretention Facility or Planter Box 4818 Dorrance
#22-2162-DP/ARB
4818 Dorrance Way
003-440-013
John Howard
SFR
2,158 002,158 x
Stormwater Control Plan for Small (Tier1) Projects
Measure 2: Permeable Pavement
Permeable pavements may include pervious concrete, pervious asphalt, porous pavers, crushed aggregate, open pavers with grass or plantings (turf block), open pavers with gravel, or solid pavers with open (non-grouted) joints.

Show on your site plan: ❑ Location, extent and types of pervious pavements.

Confirm the following standardsare met: ❑ No erodible areas drain on to permeable pavement. ❑ Subgrade compaction is minimal. ❑ Reservoir base course is of open-graded crushed stone. Base depth (3 " or more) is adequate to retain
rainfall and support design loads (more depth may be required). ❑ No subdrain is included or, if a subdrain is included, outlet elevation is a minimum of 3 inches above bottom of base course.
❑ Subgrade is level and slopes are not so steep that subgrade is prone to erosion. ❑ Rigid edge is provided to retain granular pavements and unit pavers. ❑ Solid unit pavers, if used, are set in sand or gravel with minimum 3/8 inch gaps between the pavers.

Joints are filled with an open-graded aggregate free of fines. ❑ Permeable concrete or porous asphalt, if used, are installed by industry-certified professionals according to the vendor’s recommendations.
❑ Selection and location of pavements incorporates Americans with Disabilities Act requirements (if applicable), site aesthetics, and uses.
❑ Additional comments:

Check with local Fire Department for applicability criteria using permeable pavement. xxxxxxxxx
333 LINDEN AVE
333 LINDEN AVE.
003-440-028

PB LIVING TRUST
3,280
3,280
COMMON OPEN SPACE PROVIDED 3,401 45%
COMMON OPEN SPACE REQUIRED 1,507 20% 0
30%
3"
2%
WM
GM
3,401 SQ. FT.

OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM
WM
GM
3,538 SQ. FT.

IMPERVIOUS DIAGRAM
LOGGIA [LC]
0 75
356
840
332
ATTACHED GARAGE [LC]
0 432
171

OVERALL SIZE OF FRONT STRUCTURE

FRONT GARAGE DESIGN

REAR GARAGE DESIGN
3,791
3,520 271
18%5
161

Page 373 of 523 ends

E
IA

N R OFI

OF CA L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D A R
ESNECI
L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
G2.0

SITE PHOTOS

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -PLANNING COMMISSION SET 03-23-2026

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232

Page 374 of 523 ends

Page 375 of 523 ends

E
IA

N R OFI

OF CA L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D A R
ESNECI
L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
C0.0
SURVEY

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -PLANNING COMMISSION SET 03-23-2026

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232

LINDEN AVENUE

DORRANCE WAY

PARCEL A

PARCEL B
Proposed Lot Lines to be Deleted Lot Line
LOT 1
R1
LOT 2
R1
LOT 5
R1
LOT 6
R1
E-2
E-1
DATE: 8-26-2025 JOB No.: 22-57 DRAWN BY: JEREMY HENRY SHEET: 1 OF 1

HENRY LAND SURVEYING

AREA TABLE

EXISTING ACREAGE
LOT 1 & 5 per R1 0.22 acres
LOT 2 per R1 0.12 acres
TOTAL 0.34 acres

PROPOSED ACREAGE
PARCEL A 0.17 acres
PARCEL B 0.17 acres
TOTAL 0.34 acres
8 1 3 5
P L S
P
ROFES

IONAL LAND SURVEYO
R
J E

R E M Y H E N
R
Y
8-26-2025
R1 = Book 9,
Maps & Surveys,

Page 95 ends

The courses and distances
shown hereon are based on
record and are not the results of
a field survey or mathematically
closed boundary survey, which
might result in different values. EASEMENTS:

E-1: General Telephone
Company of California
1436 OR 450
E-2: General Telephone
Company of California
1436 OR 451

LINDEN AVENUE

DORRANCE WAY
Building
Building
LOT 5
LOT 1
LOT 2
Proposed Lot Line to be Deleted Lot Line
to be removed

PARCEL A

PARCEL B
DATE: 8-26-2025 JOB No.: 22-57 DRAWN BY: JEREMY HENRY SHEET: 1 OF 1

HENRY LAND SURVEYING

SITE PLAN
8 1 3 5
P L S
P
ROFES

IONAL LAND SURVEYO
R
J E

R E M Y H E N
R
Y
8-26-2025

Page 1 of 1 ends

EXHIBIT “A”

LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

Page 95 ends

Prepared on September 1, 2025 by:

Jeremy Henry PLS 8135
Henry Land Surveying
805-216-6124
[email protected]

Page 376 of 523 ends

E
IA

N R OFI

OF CA L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D A R
ESNECI
L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
A1.0

SITE PLAN

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -PLANNING COMMISSION SET 03-23-2026

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232
NORTH
feet 0 8 16

SITE PLAN
4 SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 1
PERMEABLE PAVER: ANGELUS PERMEABLE COURTYARD
PAVERS, SAND-STONE-MOCHA. ASHLAR PATTERN

KEY NOTES
1 2
3 4
(E) SIDEWALK: TO REMAIN
6' TALL WOODEN FENCE ON PROPERTY LINE: NATURAL
FINISH
5 6 STUCCO SITE WALL: 42" TALL SMOOTH STUCCO SITE

WALL TO MATCH HOUSE
7 (P) CURB CUT AND APRON:
8 (E) 30" SYCAMORE TREE TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE:

SEE ARBORIST REPORT
9 (E) PALM TREE TO REMAIN:
10 (E) WATER METER: 3/4" WATER METER, 1 1/2" MAIN.

THAT IS REQUIRED WITHIN SIGHT OF AND NOT OVER
50 FT FROM AIR CONDITIONER PER CMC 903.2.7.
(P) FIRE SPRINKLER RISER
13 14
TREE PROTECTION FENCING: SEE TPP AND ARBORIST
REPORT
15 FLAGSTONE: ON CONCRETE PAD
16 3/8 " GRAVEL MULCH:
17 36" TALL WOODEN FENCE ON PROPERTY LINE: NATURAL
FINISH. FOR THE FIRST 20' IN FROM DORRANCE FOR
VISION CLEARANCE.

RIBBON DRIVEWAY:
0 ELECTRICAL SERVICE PANEL
N.T.S. 3
NEW LOCATION OF 200 AMP ELECTRIC SERVICE PANEL
PROVIDE BONDING & UFFER GROUND. S.C.E MSR # XXXXXXX

NEW MAIN SERVICE
200A 3P 120/240V
MAIN 200A

DISCONNECT
4" SCH 40
(SCH 80 SWEEPS &

RISERS)
U.G. TO S.C.E. VAULT
PROVIDE 1/4" POLY

ROPE INSIDE
NEW 200 AMP PANEL

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. ELECTRODE SHALL BE:

OF THE CONCRETE ENCASED TYPE.

LOCATED IN THE BOTTOM THREE (3) INCHES OF THE FOOTING.

NOT LESS THAN TWENTY (20) FEET IN LENGTH.
250.66, BUT NOT SMALLER THAN NO. 4 A.W.G.

PANEL LOCATION NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH EDISON CO

GROUNDING SHALL BE REQUIRED AND THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE GROUNDING

BARE COPPER CONDUCTOR, SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CODE, TABLE 0 METER ASSEMBLY SEPARATION
N.T.S. 5

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. SIZE AND DIMENSIONS OF PANELS WILL VARY. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO SCALE.

THIS DRAWING PERTAINS TO BOTH OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND
ELECTRIC SERVICE APPLICATIONS.

MAINTAIN A 3-FOOT CLEAR, LEVEL, AND UNOBSTRUCTED
WORKSPACE IN FRONT OF ELECTRIC SERVICE EQUIPMENT.

PLUMBING FIXTURES THAT EXTEND MORE THAN 6 INCHES OUT FROM WALL SURFACE MUST BE LOCATED 18-INCHES MINIMUM FROM THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF THE METER PANEL.

FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION ONLY, DOES NOT APPLY FOR UPGRADES. 6'-3" MAX.\X4'-0" MIN. 27/64" 7/32"
METER
PANEL
CATV
TELCO
TYP.

GAS
METER

PLUMBING FIXTURE
FINAL
GRADE

1. 2.

THE HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE METER TO THE NEAREST SIDE WALL OR OTHER OBSTRUCTION SHALL BE 10 INCHES MINIMUM.

A HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE FROM THE EDGE OF THE METER PANEL TO THE

CLOSET OR RECESSED IN AN ENCLOSURE, THE DEPTH OF THE WORKSPACE IS MEASURED FROM THE OUTER FACE OF THE CLOSET OR RECESS. THE MINIMUM HEIGHT OF THE WORKSPACE SHALL BE 78 INCHES.

LEVEL WORKING AND

STANDING SPACE
10" MIN
36" MIN.
36" MIN.
78" MIN.
6'-3" MAX.\X4'-0" MIN.

CL
10" MIN
OTHER

OBSTRUCTION
SIDE
WALL
0 ELECTRICAL METER INSTALL
N.T.S. 4

EROSION CONTROL AND BMP NOTES
Owner:

Detailed Erosion Control Plan preparer:

Construction Entrance:

The existing asphaltic concrete shared driveway, acting as the construction entrance onto public way, shall be kept clean and free of mud and dirt that is tracked onto it.

Catch Basin Protection:

A filter system shall be used on catch basins (drop inlets) in public and private streets, or parking lots downstream of this project. See detail ON SITE PLAN.

Sediment Filters/Barriers (Silt Fences and Straw Wattles):

Sediment filters such as silt fences or straw wattles shall be installed along the down slope edge of the disturbed area, prior to the commencement of grading.

Plastic Sheeting/Tarps:

Existing Vegetation and Revegetation:

15. If vegetation is not established by said date, see Wet Weather Measures below.

Slope Protection:

Wet Weather Measures:

General Site Protection:

Non-storm water runoff from equipment and vehicle washing and any other activity shall be contained at the site.

Trash and construction related solid wastes must be deposited into a covered receptacle to prevent contamination of rainwater and dispersal by wind.

Shoring, Construction Fencing, and other Site Safety:

Protection Measure Removal:

0.55 or below for residential areas, and 0.45 or below
for non-residential areas.

Total Area (A) Total Area (A+C)
Average ETAF B ÷ A Sitewide ETAF (B+D) ÷ (A+C)

MWELO WORKSHEET

PROPERTY LINE

SETBACK
LEGEND
(N) ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
G
E

GAS LINE
ELEC. LINE

S SEWER LINE

W WATER LINE

BF BACKFLOW PREVENTER
Minimum 5% slope for a minimum of 10' away from strucutre (2% if surface is impervious) or to approved drainage system.

SBCO Grading Ordinance #4766
PALM 16"
27 13.65
PALM 8"
28 13.64
PALM 8"
29 13.34

COR PAVER DR
30 13.86

COR PAVER DR
31 14.07

FF GARAGE
32 14.61

FF GARAGE
33 14.63

FF GARAGE
34 14.64

FF THRESHOLD
35 15.22 FF WOOD LANDING
36 15.03

FF THRESHOLD
37 15.08 FF STONE LANDING
38 14.93

FF STONE LANDING
39 15.57

FF THRESHOLD
40 15.71

FF STONE LANDING
41 14.94

BLDG COR
44 BLDG COR
45 BLDG COR
46 BLDG COR
47 BLDG COR
48 BLDG COR
49 BLDG COR
50 BLDG COR
52 BLDG COR
53 PP
54 PP
55 PALM 12"
56 TC
60 12.80
FL
61 12.30
PALM 12"
62 13
PA
.41
LM 12"
63 13.29
FH
64 12.66
LIGH
65 T

12.53 PALM 24"
66 12.63
WM
67 12.45
TC
68 12.28
FL
69 11.78
PALM 24"
70 11.94
SIG
7 N
1 11.82
WM
72 11.55
LIGH
73 T

11.31 TC
74 11.33
FL
75 10.79

FF STONE LANDING
76 14.86

FF THRESHOLD
77 15.01

FF STONE LANDING
78 14.47

CORCOVEREDAERA
79 BLDG COR
80 TREE /30"
81 PALM 10"
82 12.52

22.9ft

20.7ft

20.5ft

19.2ft

18.5ft

18.8ft

18.5ft

19.4ft

19.7ft

23.0ft

24.1ft

24.6ft

24.0ft

24.1ft

23.6ft

22.7ft

22.6ft

20.2ft

20.0ft

20.6ft

19.9ft

17.8ft

17.7ft

19.5ft

19.4ft

17.5ft

15.4ft

20.2ft

20.7ft

20.6ft

20.9ft

21.1ft

21.0ft

21.3ft

21.8ft

30.5ft

28.2ft

35.5ft

28.4ft

31.4ft

31.7ft

31.9ft

32.6ft

32.8ft

35.4ft

32.4ft

32.6ft

20.0ft

DORRANCE WAY
1319

14.30 1321

12.74 1326

11.00 1327

11.60 1328

25.24 1329

13.00 1330

13.17 1354

13.93 1355

13.86 1356

13.97 1357

13.87 1358

13.93 1359

13.95 1360

13.88 1384

13.81 1385

13.87 1386

13.91 1393

13.94 1394

13.93 1395

13.98 1460

13.04 1461

13.00 1473

12.99 1474

13.14 1487

13.36 1488

13.71 1489

13.67 1504

13.70 1505

13.61 1506

13.37 1519

12.9 1
5 520

13.16 1521

13.35 1522

13.46 1523

13.70 1524

13.08 1525

13.15 1537

12.30 1538

12.61 1539

13.07 1540

13.36 1541

13.48 1542

13.51 1543

13.14 1545

13.35 1557

11.75 1558

11.62 1559

11.77 1560

12.24 1561

12.47 1562

13.06 1563

13.26 1564

13.21 1565

13.46 1567

13.38 1581

11.68 1582

11.77 1583

13.33 1584

13.60 1585

13.64 1586

13.60 1587

13.60 1600

14.37 1601

13.76 1602

13.76 1618

12.67 1619

12.88 1620

13.39 1621

14.46 1622

14.43 1623

14.10 1624

13.93 1625

14.13 1639

10.96 1640

11.35 1641

11.47 1642

13.71 1643

13.71 1644

14.04 1645

14.26 1646

14.10 1647

14.16 1662

11.03 1663

11.16 1664

14.17 1665

13.94 1666

14.12 1667

14.24 1682

11.35 1683

11.49 1684

11.93 1685

12.02 1686

14.25 1687

14.39 1754

11.67 1755

11.71 1756

11.76 1757

11.72 1760

11.64 1823

11.62 1824

11.67 1825

12.17 1826

14.10 1843

12.11 1844

11.83 1845

12.69 1846

14.27 1868

12.21 1869

12.30 1870

12.74 1871

13.07 1872

14.14 1890

12.71 1891

12.32 1892

12.49 1893

13.30 1908

12.82 1909

12.85 1910

12.82 1940

11.48 1978
1979

12.99 1980

12.23 1981

11.90 1982

11.26 1983

11.03 1984

10.91 Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
FF 15.08'
FF 15.71'
FF 14.63'
FF 14.61'
FF 15.01'
FF 15.22'
Hydrant
Sidewalk
Sid
e
wal
k
C
u
r
b & G
u
t
t
e
r
C
u
r
b & G
u
t
t
e
r
Si
d
e
wal
k
Light
Light
12" Palm
8" Palm
8" Palm
10" Palm
12" Pa
1 lm
2" Palm
16" Palm
24" Palm
24" Palm
Powerpole
Powerpole
30" Tree
Water
Water
Fe
n
c
e
Fence
F
e
n
c
e
Fence
Edge of Pavement
Paver Driveway
A
p
p
r
o
x
F
e
n
c
e
Approx Fence
Wall
W
all
Wall
Wall Wall Wall
D
e
c
k
D
Wood Deck
e
c
k
Deck
2033

11.93 14.00

14.00 14.00

13.00 12.00

12.00 11 0. 0
12 0. 0
13 0. 0
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
117.50'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"E

45.00'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"E

45.00'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
157.50'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
157.50'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"E

45.00'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W

50.00'
LOT 1
LOT 2

45.00'
WM
GM
DYH
DYH

DYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYH

DYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYHDYH

DYH DYH DYH DYH DYH

DYHDYHDYH
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A

DYH DYH DYH DYH DYH DYH DYH DYH DYH DYH DYH DYH DYH DYH 2 1
6 3
3 4
8 1
4 4 4
1 1
16 16
16 16
2 2
2 16
4 17
6 16
6 16
1 1
1 1
9 10
12 13
15 15
11 7
5 17
4 4
16 4
5'-0"
15' REAR SETBACK
LINDEN AVE.

LANDING
3'-0"
3'-0"
12'-0"
13'-9 1/2"
16'-3 1/2"
22'-2 3/4"
35'-0 1/4" 5'-0"
79'-0" 20'-0" 20' FRONT SETBACK
24'-0" 20'-0" 45'-6 1/4" 33'-5 3/4" 20'-0"
4'-11 3/4" 27'-10 1/4" 12'-2" 4'-11 3/4"

DRIVEWAY
(P) FOOTPRINT HOUSE
1 6
3 3
4 4
4 8
6 2
1 1
4 4
4 4 4
10 11
13 12
14 14
2 17
16 16
16 16
16 1
16 2
2 1
9 6
4 1
1 5
7 17
20'-0"
E
E
E
W W
W
W
W
W W

G G G G
G

SS SS SS SS
15 15'-0"
(P) FOOTPRINT GARAGE
24'-6"
1'-6" 12'-0" 1'-6"
15'-0"
(P) EASEMENT
45'-0"(P) EASEMENT

FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS

Page 377 of 523 ends

E
IA

N R OFI

OF CA L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D A R
ESNECI
L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
A2.0
1ST FLOOR PLAN

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -PLANNING COMMISSION SET 03-23-2026

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232
W/D

DISH TRASH
KING

REF WINE
WH

COND COND
2 A4.0
1 A4.0

FAMILY ROOM

KITCHEN
ENTRY
BATH #1
DINING
1ST FLOOR
2,277 SQ. FT.

BED #1
UP
PWDR.

GARAGE
840 SQ. FT.

CL
45'-6 1/4" 12'-4 3/4" 21'-1"
22'-10 1/2" 12'-3"

LIVING ROOM

MUDROOM
HALL
14'-1" 9'-11" 20'-0" 79'-0"
16'-11 1/4" 6'-5 1/2" 7'-5 1/2" 14'-2" 5'-5 1/2" 28'-6 1/4" 35'-0 1/4"
24'-0"
CL
feet 0 4 8
1ST FLOOR PLAN
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" 1
NORTH

Page 378 of 523 ends

IA N R OF
I
OF
C
A
L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D
A
R
E

SNECI L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
A2.1
2ND FLOOR PLAN

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -PLANNING COMMISSION SET 03-23-2026

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232
feet
048
2ND FLOOR PLAN
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
1 KING
KING
KING
2 A4.0
1 A4.0
P. BED
P. BATH P. CL

BALCONY

BALCONY
2ND FLOOR
1,243 SQ. FT.

STAIR

LAUNDRY
BED #2
BATH #2
BED #3
BATH #3
CL
7'-0" 11'-5 1/2" 4'-5" 1'-4 3/4" 8'-9 1/4" 2'-0"
79'-0"
4'-1 7/8" 5'-7 3/8" 8'-0" 5'-1 7/8" 7'-11" 7'-9 1/2" 6'-4 1/2" 15'-0 3/4" 18'-11" 29'-1"
6" 14'-4 1/4" 12'-8 7/8" 2'-0"
15'-5 3/4" 8'-11 7/8" 15'-10 3/8" 5'-2 1/4" 15'-0 1/4" 18'-5 1/2"

Page 379 of 523 ends

IA N R OF
I
OF
C
A
L

T A T S
T C E
IT
C H
D
A
R
E

SNECI L

DYLAN CHAPPELL
C - 32913
REN. 5.31.2027
A2.2

ROOF PLAN

STORY POLE
PLAN

AND PLANS REPRESENTED BY THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS. USE OR COPY
IS PERMITTED BY CONTRACT ONLY. THE USE OR REVISIONS

OF THESE IDEAS OR PLANS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DYLAN CHAPPELL ARCHITECTS

CHAPPELL

ARCHITECTURE

COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIAL
4353 BARTON RD
LOOMIS, CA 95650
805.852.1677
I

COORDINATION SET

NOT FOR BIDDING
OR CONSTRUCTION 333 LINDEN AVE SFR 333 LINDEN AVE CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 -PLANNING COMMISSION SET 03-23-2026

NO DESCRIPTION DATE

CITY CASE NUMBER
PLN2022-2232
NORTH
feet
048

ROOF PLAN
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
1 KING
KING
KING
RIDGE

2.5:12
4:12
4:12
4:124:12
4:124:124:124:124:124:12
RIDGE

2.5:12

ROOF ABOVE

ROOF BELOW

ROOF ABOVE

ROOF BELOW

ROOF ABOVE

ROOF BELOW

2.5:12

2.5:12
feet
048

STORY POLE PLAN
2 SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
2 P5P5
TREE /30" 81 PALM 10" 8212.52

20.2ft 20.0ft

20.6ft

19.9ft

17.8ft

17.7ft

20.7ft

21.1ft
1537 12.30
1538 12.61
1560 12.24
1561 12.47
1618 12.67
10"
Palm
Powerpole
30" Tree
F
e
n
c
e
F
e
n
c
e
1 2.00

12.00 157.50'
N45\U+00B0 00' 00"W
157.50'
L
22'-3"
A.F.F. A.F.F.
22'-3"
OT 2
19'-6"
A.F.F.
22'-4"
A.F.F.
22'-4"
A.F.F.
19'-6"
A.F.F.
20'-11"
A.F.F.
19'-0"
A.F.F.
19'-0"
A.F.F.
19'-0"
A.F.F.
20'-11"
A.F.F.
+1' +1'
-2'-8"
-2'-8"
+2"
+2"
+0" +0"

Page 380 of 523 ends

Carpinteria City CouncilSeptember 14, 2026

Carpinteria City Council
September 14, 2026