Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Carson City Council
January 21, 2025

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
January 21, 2025
Body
Carson City Council
Pages
16
Original file
72.9 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on firebasestorage.googleapis.com. That file is the official record.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS,

LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION,

SUBDIVISION MAPPING SECTION
(626) 458-4915
(626) 458-4949 FAX
CORRECTION LIST FOR TRACT NO.___________
(CIRCLE ONE) 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 5TH 6TH 7TH 8TH 9TH 10TH SUBMITTAL SURVEYOR/ENGINEER:_________________________________
ASSIGNED MAP CHECKER:______________________________
SUPERVISING MAP CHECKER:___________________________
REVIEW COMPLETED:__________________________________

LEGEND: CC = County Code; SMA = Subdivision Map Act;
PLS Act = Professional Land Surveyors Act; BR = Board Rules.

This tract has been checked and the necessary corrections, additions, and instructions are circled below. The attached check print(s) and Correction List must be returned with the tracing when submitting a recheck.

Please address every correction note and comment on the attached check print(s). If you make additional changes that were not requested, please inform the map checker. If you have a question, please speak to or correspond with the map checker or his/her supervisor
. Make all corrections or additions as noted on the
attached check print(s) before resubmitting for another check. Only complete, formal submittals will be accepted and reviewed.

3. Submit original tracings on polyester based film or mylar to this office for final review after completion of all reviews and when instructed by your map checker.

4. Trim the original tracing(s) to 18″ by 26″ overall with a blank 1″ margin on all sides. The mylar(s) will be measured (SMA 66434(b)).

5. Ink must be black (no grayscale), opaque, and permanent in nature. All required certificates must be preprinted or stamped in black, opaque, and permanent ink. Execute all signatures with extra-fine point black marker or 1.0 mm, black, gel-roller ball pen (NO BALL POINT PENS) without obscuring other text.

All printed information must be on the front side of the mylar. Non-permanent printing will require replacement or clear coating of each affected sheet to assure permanent legibility. (SMA 66434 (a))

6. The minimum size of all text shall be 0.10″, Arial 10.5 point, or similar; do no overlap or obscure any text; use only black, solid lettering, no shadow text, no ghost text, and no block outline text.

7. Draft the map at a scale that legibly shows all delineated line work, labels, dimensioning, and text. The map must be clearly readable for referencing and retracement in perpetuity by all professionals after recordation and digital archiving by the County.

8. Show/correct map scale and/or detail scale (CC 21.44 Part 2). Use engineering scale measurements, not architectural.

9. Show the north arrow with the proper angular orientation to the drawing (CC 21.44.140).

10. Correct all spelling/grammar errors and activate the “Spell-Check” tool on your CAD application.

11. Show “Sheet _________ of _________ Sheet(s)” beginning with the title sheet first (CC 21.44 Part 2).

12. Provide a 3″ across by 4″ down rectangular space for the County Recorder‟s use in the upper right corner of Sheet 1.

13. Show title on all sheets: TRACT NO. ___, IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA; TRACT NO. ___, IN THE CITY OF _____, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA (CC 21.44, Part 2).

14. Show/correct the subtitle (caption) on the map and/or on the preliminary subdivision report/guarantee.

15. Use only formal language/verbiage throughout the title sheets. Spell-out all words; no abbreviations except in legal names/titles.

16. Reference street vacation(s) in the subtitle.

17. Reference off-site easement dedication(s) in the subtitle.

18. Show purpose on each sheet below the title or subtitle: “FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES”, “FOR CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION PURPOSES", "DIVISION OF LAND FOR PURPOSES OF LEASE ONLY”, or “FOR RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT”.

1. Payment of the following Recorder‟s Fees are required (reference the current fee schedule):
___________ a. Map filing - $10.00 for first sheet, plus $3.00 for each additional sheet. ___________ b. Document Recording (Separate easement dedication, etc.) - $9.00 for first page, plus $3.00 each additional page (a double-sided document is two pages).

2. Payment of the following fees are required (reference the current fee schedule):
a. Map Analysis $_____________ e. Verification of Conditions $______________ b. Map Analysis ____Chk $_____________ f. Tax Clearance $______________ c. Easement Checking $_____________ g. Tax Bond/Security $______________ d. M onument Checking $_____________ h. Other (monument bond, etc.) $______________ EXHIBIT A-1-B
Revised: January 20, 2009

Page 2 of 4 ends

19. Show/correct distinctive border on the front side of the mylar inside the boundary of new lots and streets being created. Show distinctive border on details and throughout the map sheets. Do not obliterate or obscure any figures, lines, or text. Use solid, bold line style with equidistant, solid circles inside the subdivision and tangent to the border.

20. Show/correct distinctive border legend on the title sheet or on every mapping sheet. Place near the top of each sheet.

21. Lot and/or unit numbering designation is/are in error (CC 21.44 Part 2).

22. Show/correct recorded conveyance deed references and recorded map references for exterior boundaries of the tract except where an exterior boundary abuts a dedicated public street. Certificates of Compliance do not convey fee title interests.

23. Provide a copy of the dedication document as noted (See # 31 below) where the exterior boundary abuts dedicated public street,.

24. Label "NOT A PART OF THIS SUBDIVISION" where noted on the check print.

25. Show the location of the one remainder area within the subdivision that will not be subdivided and label it as “Remainder Parcel”.

26. If units are filed, submit a key map indicating all of the units and the order of filing.

27. Show references to adjoining sheets and compare duplicated information on adjoining sheet (CC 21.44 Part 2).

28. Submit a copy of the signed and approved tentative map conditions and copies of other signed and approved official documents showing the date of tentative map approval and the expiration date. The tentative map conditions and approval expire on ______________________________.

29. Request an extension of time from the Planning Department prior to expiration of tentative map approval.

30. Map does not conform to tentative map and conditions of approval. See condition number(s) ___________________.

31. Submit COMPLETE, FULL-SIZE, LEGIBLE copies of all deeds, field book pages, and other documents/information references shown on the map and needed to interpret references on the map. The recorded/filed/indexed numbers (book and page) must be clearly visible. Copies of Corner Records must include both pages; reductions, partial copies, and illegible text are not acceptable.

32. Show/correct/state method of establishment of all public street centerlines, boundary lines, supporting boundary lines, lot lines, easement lines, and corners on the map. Cite references of recorded/filed evidence where noted and comply with #31 above.

33. Submit sketch/drawing and traverse calculations of establishment method of easement(s) originating outside the boundary.

34. Submit sketch/drawing with traverse calculations, dimensioning, and point # locations clearly indicating proportionate measurement methods, references, and calculations.

35. Correctly label archived locations of every field book reference: CITY ENG. F.B.; CITY ENG. T.B. (Tie book); COUNTY ENG. F.B; L.A. CO. P.W.F.B.; L.A. CO. R.D.F.B.; L.A.C.F.C.D. F.C.F.B. or L.A. CO.

F.C.F.B.; L.A. CO. C.S.F.B. or CO. SURVEYOR F.B.

36. Comply with all State law provisions when using/referencing the California Coordinate System.

37. Show/correct the basis of bearing note and use only formal verbiage. Place note under the Surveyor‟s/Engineer‟s Statement.

38. Comply with the monument requirements of the County Engineer and CC Chapter 21.20 for all monuments.

39. Label all found monuments with recorded/filed references or state “NO REFERENCE”. For every monument, cite the LS#, RCE#, or agency name on the tag/washer or cite “NO WASHER”, “NO TAG”, and/or “NO #”. A “NO REFERENCE” monument is not acceptable without supporting record evidence proving its position. Every unmarked boundary corner monument and unmarked centerline tie monument of acceptable durability must be marked OR durable, marked monuments must be set at offsets.

Unmarked centerline monuments may require marking and will require 4 durable marked ties. In cities, coordinate the filing of tie notes with the city engineer. In unincorporated areas, file Corner Records with the County Surveyor through this division.

40. Clearly describe all details of every monument found or set. Every iron pipe, found or set, must cite the depth/height above/below surrounding grade and the outside diameter (O.D.). Points falling on maintenance holes (manholes) shall describe the type of maintenance hole such as SSMH for sanitary sewer maintenance hole or SDMH for storm drain maintenance hole.

Revised: January 20, 2009

Page 3 of 4 ends

41. Every monument set at an offset to perpetuate a record point or found at an offset from the record point must have clearly labeled bearings and distances along each tie line from the record point to the offset monument; dimension perpendicular offsets from boundary lines or prolongations of boundary lines (Reference the County Surveyor‟s Monument Requirements).

42. All monuments must be set, inspected, and approved before submittal for legislative body approval.

Boundary corner monuments and centerline monuments on dedicated/offered interior streets may be deferred after verified compliance with CC 21.20.060.

43. Request a monument inspection by signed letter from the map‟s surveyor to this office addressed to the County Engineer and stating that all monuments are set, ready for inspection, and comply with CC & SMA; include Corner Records and/or city tie notes.

44. Label all monuments approved for deferral as “TO BE SET”; modify the Surveyor's/Engineer's Statement accordingly.

45. Submit a copy of the posted monument bond receipt from the city for all approved, deferred monument settings.

46. Show/correct adjoining streets, widths, and names. Clearly show transitioning by duplicating data/labels/line work.

47. Show/correct bearings and distances on all lines; use leader lines and leader arrows where necessary.

48. Show/correct curve data for every street centerline, street sideline, and property line corner returns. Label the radial line bearings where noted. Label the radial line bearings at each delineated termini along non- tangent curves.

49. Show lot areas (both net & gross when appropriate) to the nearest square foot or 0.01 acre when over 3 acres.

50. Lot areas do not meet present zoning. Contact the Planning Department.

51. Show/correct/enclose every drawing detail. Drawing details are required where dimensioning is not clearly visible at the sheet‟s scale. Enclose the detail, labels, and dimensioning in a bold, dashed, enclosure line style ( ).

52. Delineate/label/tie-in all city boundaries adjoining or crossing the tract‟s boundary. Verify any proposed annexations prior to filing.

53. Submit traverse closure calculations clearly showing/labeling the POB and location of each traverse, the sequence of courses, the bearing and length to close, the precision ratio, the length of the traverse, the error in latitude, the error in departure, and the angular error. Show lengths to the nearest 1/100 of a foot (0.01′) and bearings to the nearest one second of angle (0° 00′ 01″).

54. The following traverses do not close within allowable limits of error (See map for specific area(s)). Submit revised traverse closure(s) for the following:
a. Distinctive border c. Block loops e. Lot(s) revised lot(s)________________ . b. Centerline loops d. Not a part areas f. Any of the above reflecting revised data

55. Verify centerline to sideline width and centerline to centerline width where noted on check print. Always use leader lines where any dimensioned width crosses any line.

56. The sum of parts does not equal the whole where noted on the check print.

57. Show/correct the Surveyor‟s/Engineer‟s Statement; LS/RCE signature must be dated; affixed seal must be legible, 1½ ″ minimum diameter, and show the licensee‟s expiration date. Provide sufficient space to easily affix the seal with no overlap of data.

58. Submit a letter from ________________________releasing this tract to___________________________.

59. Complete/correct the title sheet as to the Owner's Statement, grants, dedications, offers, restrictions, etc.

Clearly delineate, dimension, and label all grants, dedications, offers, restrictions, etc., on the map sheets.

60. Verify that dedications, grants, and/or offers to dedicate easements/rights to the County (County Map) or to the City (City Map) as cited in the Owner's Statement are accepted or rejected in the Asst. Deputy Director‟s/Executive Officer‟s Certificate or in the City Clerk's Certificate. Every easement/right granted, dedicated, or offered must be delineated and tied-out on the map sheet(s) and accepted/rejected using the same easement nature described in the Owner‟s Statement.

61. (County Map) Verify that grants, dedications, and/or offers to dedicate easements to the L.A.C.F.C.D., County Sanitation District, and Waterworks District are accepted or rejected in a certificate executed by an Asst. Deputy Director/Deputy Executive Officer.

62. Show (future) slope easement and appropriate ties on the map sheet. Dedicate (future) slope easement in the Owner's Statement.

Revised: January 20, 2009

Page 4 of 4 ends

63. The title sheet does not agree with the preliminary subdivision guarantee dated __________________ with respect to owners/trustees/beneficiaries/easement holders/interest holders. Need authority for the signatures of ____________.

64. Show/correct signature omissions. State verbatim from the recorded easement document the purpose/nature of every easement cited in the signature omissions and on the map sheet. Verify „indeterminate‟ or „blanket in nature‟ designations. Have the preliminary subdivision guarantee revised accordingly.

65. (County maps) Submit all public utility/public entity letters for every applicable signature omission to this office and addressed to the Board of Supervisors or submit the signed statement that State law has been met with respect to public utility/public entity signature omissions. (City maps) Submit all public utility/public entity letters for every applicable signature omission to the City Engineer‟s office addressed to the City Council or submit a signed statement that State law has been met with respect to public utility/public entity signature omissions.

66. Show/correct/label every easement affecting the lots and show ties to lot lines. If easements are blanket, indeterminate, or within an area being dedicated for public street, so state in the signature omission note.

67. Submit a preliminary subdivision guarantee dated within the last 90 days.

68. Submit a revised preliminary subdivision guarantee.

69. Complete/correct the title sheet with respect to signatures, seals, acknowledgments, and spelling.

70. Dedicate building restriction rights over the restricted use area(s) in the Owner's Statement.

71. Show/correct flood hazard note and/or geological hazard note on each sheet of the map showing each hazard. Label a summary note on title sheet with ¼″ boldface lettering. Dedicate building restriction rights over the hazard area(s) in the Owner's Statement.

72. Show/correct/label natural drainage course(s), flood hazard area(s), geological hazard area(s), and/or the accompanying note(s).

73. Show/correct street alternate section note on each sheet of map.

74. Show/correct condominium note indicating that common areas/lots will provide access and utility easements.

75. Show/correct residential planned unit development notes.

76. Show/correct Certificates. (City Engineer‟s, City Clerk‟s, Special Assessment‟s, County Engineer‟s, Tax Certificates (2), etc.)

77. Provide 2¼” diameter space to affix County Seal next to tax certificates and for required City Seals next to City Clerk‟s Certificate.

78. Contact the following Departments, Divisions, or Sections marked below for clearances and clearance requirements. Submit necessary improvement plans, improvement security agreements, and/or other documents:

Road Section, LDD, LACDPW
Department of Regional Planning
Department of Parks and Rec.

Department of Health Services
Department of Fire
Drainage Section, LDD, LACDPW
Sewer Section, LDD, LACDPW
Water Section, LDD, LACDPW
Geology Section, GMED, LACDPW
Grading Section, LDD, LACDPW
Street Names, MPM, LACDPW
Building and Safety, BSD, LACDPW

79. Submit a confirmation letter from City Engineer verifying compliance with all conditions of tentative map approval.

80. Current tax clearance is outstanding.

81. Submit the tax bond estimate declaration signed by all owners of record.

82. Post security to cover the tax bond of $___________________________.

83. Submit _____ prints of the revised map. (Check, File, Monument Inspection, Tax, Road, Planning , Parks & Rec, Health, Fire, Drainage, Sewer, Water, Geology, Grading, Street Names, Building & Safety, and other.)

84. Comply with the Los Angeles County Condominium Conversion Ordinance requirements.

85. Submit a notarized affidavit, signed by all owners of record at the time of filing the map with the Registrar-Recorder/County Cle rk‟s Office, stating that the proposed condominium building has not been constructed or that the building has not been, and will not be, occupied or rented until after the filing of the map with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk‟s Office.

86. Send a copy of the latest version of the final map to your title company and/or to the City Engineer for review. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ TRACT CORRECTION CHECKLIST FORM_REVISED 1-20-2009.doc

Page 1 of 1 ends

Acceptable boundary monuments are: 2” (O.D.) IRON PIPE OF 21/2’ LENGTH WITH (CEMENT) PLUG, (BRASS) TACK,

AND (BRASS) TAG AND WITH THE DEPTH OF THE TOP OF THE PIPE RELATIVE TO THE GROUND SURFACE PROPERLY NOTED; 6” SPIKE AND STAMPED WASHER; or LEAD, (BRASS) TACK, AND (BRASS) TAG. When required, acceptable interior lot or parcel boundary monuments are: 1” to 2” (O.D.) IRON PIPE WITH PLUG, (BRASS) TACK, AND (BRASS) TAG; 6” SPIKE AND STAMPED WASHER; or LEAD, (BRASS) TACK, AND (BRASS) TAG. Pipes of less than 2” (O.D) and less than 21/2 feet long, concrete nails, magnetized nails, small spikes, spikes less than 6” long, PK nails, wood stakes, chiseled crosses, rebar, punch marks on manhole rims or covers, and any monument set in a vertical surface are not acceptable as boundary monuments. Interior lot or parcel boundary monuments, if required, may be a less substantial monument and are at the authority and discretion of the County Engineer or City Engineer where applicable. If other monument types are found and used, their acceptability is at the discretion of the County Engineer or City Engineer where applicable.

Every “SET” boundary monument must be of acceptable durability with an engraved #, stamped washer, or brass tag, and be set at a boundary corner (first preferred), be within 5 feet of the boundary corner on the map’s boundary (second preferred), or be within 5 feet of the boundary corner along a prolongation of a line in the map’s boundary (last preferred). Every “FOUND” boundary monument must have a recorded/filed reference and be “ACCEPTED AS ( THE SPECIFIC RECORD BOU NDARY CORNER BEING PERPETUATED ) ”. In all cases where any type of monument is found at a boundary corner, its complete, existing details and recorded/filed references shall be noted in the monument note on the map. Where the found monument is not of an acc eptable type, it shall be replaced with an acceptable monument and marked by the surveyor of the map. When the found monument does not have a tag or a number, does not have a reference, or appears disturbed or damaged, those facts shall be duly noted in the monument note on the map. If a found boundary corner monument located at the record corner is acceptable in all ways except it is missing a tag, the monument shall be retagged, replaced, or rehabilitated as necessary until it is acceptable in all required details. If a found monument at a record point is acceptable in all ways except it does not have a reference, the monument shall be retagged, replaced, or rehabilitated as necessary until it is acceptable in all required details. All “NO REFERENCE” monuments, tagged or not, shall meet the requirements of the County Code and shall, by the recording of the map, be brought into the recorded reference ‘world’ for recorded perpetuation of its current location and for proper use by others.

Every monument note o f a found monument shall state specifically the type of monument found and the type of monument set. Where a firmly set and found spike and washer is located at a boundary corner, has “NO REFERENCE” and/or “NO TAG”, cannot be removed without causing collat eral damage to the immediate surface area, and is noted on the map as “ACCEPTED AS “(
THE SPECIFIC RECORD BOUNDARY CORNER BEING PERPETUATED )”, the spike and washer may be considered acceptable if another acceptable monument is set using the same guidelines as stated above for “SET” monuments and is approved by the County Engineer.

Every “ESTABLISHED” boundary corner must be “ACCEPTED AS “( THE SPECIFIC RECORD BOUNDARY CORNER BEING PERPETUATED)”. If the boundary corner falls on a non-permanent structure, an acceptable monument shall be set along the boundary in both directions from the established boundary corner using the same guidelines as stated above for “SET” monuments. Locations greater than 5 feet from the boundary corner or conditions requiring alternate settings shall be at the discretion and authority of the County Engineer or City Engineer where applicable.

Additional Notes:
• Where field notes are cited, include an abbreviation in the monument note reference to indicate if the field notes are County, City, State, or other agency. For example, use “L.A. CO. P.W.F.B.” for Los Angeles County Public Works Field Book, “CITY ENG. F.B.” for City Engineer Field Book, “L.A. CO. R.D.F.B.” for C ounty Road Department Field Book, “CO. ENG. F.B.” for County Engineer Field Book, CO. SURVEYOR F.B. for County Surveyor Field Book, or “L.A.C.F.C.D. F.C.” for Los Angeles County Flood Control Field Book.
• The preferred label of a found “LEAD, (BRASS) TACK, AND (BRASS) TAG” is “L, T, & TAG”. The tack must be indicated in the abbreviation. A brass tag set in epoxy may be cited as a record reference from a Record of Survey, but shall be replaced with a durable monument if used as a boundary corner or as a monum ent in a line used to support the boundary establishment. The monument note shall state, “SET L & T, TAGGED L.S. ####” or “SET LD. AND TACK, TAGGED L.S. ####.”
• On a pipe monument, the preferred label of “(BRASS) TACK AND (BRASS) TAG IN A CEMENT PLUG” is “TACK AND TAG IN CEMENT PLUG”. The tack and the type of plug must be indicated in the abbreviation. A brass tag set in epoxy may be cited as a reference from a Record of Survey, but shall be replaced with an acceptable, durable monument if used as a boundary corner or as a monument in any line used to support the boundary establishment. As an example, the monument note shall state, “SET 2” I.P. CEMENT PLUG & TACK, TAGGED L.S. ####. FLUSH.” • State if the boundary monument falls on the top of a wall and provide the height of the boundary monument relative to the ground surface.
• Every map shall have acceptable monuments set or found along the boundary at distances not to exceed 1,000 feet or at such lesser distances as determined by the County Engineer or City Engineer where applicable. Where topography limits the line of sight between acceptable boundary monuments, additional boundary monuments shall be set or found to ensure a clear line of sight between each boundary monument along the boundary. • Every intersection of the abutting street’s centerline and the prolongation of the line in the map’s boundary traversing away from the abutting street’s sideline and to said centerline shall be monumented with an acceptable centerline monument. • Every boundary corner along the map’s boundary shall be monumented. This includes the locations along the boundary that are common to the sideline of an abutting public street. Where public street dedications are made, the preferred location for a boundary monument shall be at the corner of the lot or parcel that will be created after the improvement of the public street .

The B.C. and E.C. of curves shall be monumented as well. • When the map’s scale is too small to correctly label, show, and delineate the leader lines and offset dimensions of a found or set boundary corner monument not at the corner being perpetuated, the map shall show a detail that clearly and legibly shows the location of the boundary corner, the location of the boundary corner monument, and the dimensions from the boundary corner to the boundary corner monument. For found boundary corner monuments, the County Engineer may require that an acceptable boundary monument be set at the boundary corner being perpetuated if sufficient working area is available. • All monuments, not set flush, shall state the height of the monument above or below finished surface. • Overlapping text on title lines shall be avoided at all times. Overlapping leader lines on text or title lines shall be avoided.

By: Jeff Owens, L.S., Deputy County Engineer, Subdivision Mapping Section, Land Development Division, Department of Public Works County of Los Angeles
Last Revised: Wednesday, June 25, 2007
EXHIBIT A-1-C

BOUNDARY MONUMENT REQUIREMENTS,
PURSUANT TO COUNTY CODE, TITLE 21, CHAPTER 21.20

Page 1 of 1 ends

CENTERLINE MONUMENT REQUIREMENTS,
PURSUANT TO COUNTY CODE, TITLE 21, CHAPTER 21.20
Acceptable street centerline monuments are: 6” SPIKE AND STAMPED WASHER; LEAD, (BRASS) TACK, AND (BRASS) TAG; or 2” (O.D.) IRON PIPE OF 21/2’ LENGTH WITH (CEMENT) PLUG, (BRASS) TACK, AND (BRASS) TAG WITH THE DEPTH OF THE TOP OF THE PIPE RELATIVE TO THE GROUND SURFACE PROPERLY NOTED.

Acceptable street centerline tie monuments are: 6” SPIKE AND STAMPED WASHER; LEAD, (BRASS) TACK, AND (BRASS) TAG; or 1” to 2” (O.D.) IRON PIPE WITH PLUG, (BRASS) TACK, AND (BRASS) TAG. Concrete nails, magnetized nails, small spikes, PK nails, wood stakes, chiseled crosses, rebar, punch marks on manhole rims or covers, and any monument set in a vertical surface are not acceptable as centerline monuments and centerline tie monuments. If other monument types are found and used, their acceptability is at the discretion of the County Engineer or City Engineer where applicable.

Every “SET” centerline intersection monument must be of acceptable durability with an engraved #, stamped washer, or brass tag, and have a minimum of 4 tagged, tangent ties (preferred) or a minimum of 3 tagged, swing (or pull) ties (acceptable in certain situations) set outside of the vehicle traveled portions of the street.

Every “FOUND” centerline intersection monument must have a recorded/filed reference and be “ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE INTERSECTION”. In all cases where ties exist and are shown on a recorded/filed reference (i.e. a County Engineer Field Book), the ties shall be recovered and measured to support the centerline intersection’s establishment. If only two or three acceptable ties exist from a set of four, the monument note shall duly state that fact and shall state that additional tangent ties are being set thereby leaving 4 tangent ties at the intesection. If all information on the tie note matches the current surveyed information, the monument note on the map shall cite “FITS ALL TIES PER (CITE REFERENCE)”. Every “FOUND” centerline intersection monument will be required to have a minimum of 4, found or set, tangent ties (preferred) or a minimum of 3 tagged, swing (or pull) ties (acceptable in certain situations) shown on a recorded/filed reference. If any centerline monument or centerline tie monument is unacceptable in any detail, it shall be retagged, reset, replaced, or rehabilitated as required. Where the centerline intersection monument does not meet durability requirements, it shall be removed and replaced with an acceptable tagged or stamped monument. New ties shall be set or existing ties shall be re- measured. Any changes to the information shown on an existing tie note reference shall be resolved by the filing of a new centerline tie note. Where a solidly set spike and washer with “NO REFERENCE” and/or “NO TAG” cannot be removed without causing collateral damage to the roadbed and is “ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE INTERSECTION”, the spike and washer may be considered acceptable if a minimum of 4 tagged, tangent ties (preferred) or a minimum of 3 tagged, swing (or pull) ties (acceptable in certain situations) are set, retagged, or rehabilitated by the current surveyor. The “NO REFERENCE” and “NO TAG” spike and washer shall have a new centerline tie note filed showing a minimum of 4 tagged, tangent ties (preferred) or a minimum of 3 tagged, swing (or pull) ties (acceptable in certain situations) with the tag of the current surveyor.

Every “ESTABLISHED” centerline intersection must be “ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE INTERSECTION”, will be required to have a tagged monument set that is of acceptable durability, and must have a minimum of 4 found, tagged, tangent ties (preferred) or a minimum of 3 tagged, swing (or pull) ties (acceptable in certain situations) set or found on a recorded/filed reference. If the centerline intersection falls on a manhole cover see (*) below. All “ESTABLISHED” centerline intersections shall meet all of the applicable requirements for “FOUND” centerline intersection monuments noted above.
(*) Centerline intersections falling on manhole cover s cannot be established from punch marks on manhole rims, must have 4 found tangent ties (preferred) per a recorded or filed reference or 3 or more swing (or pull) ties (acceptable in certain situations) per a recorded or filed reference, and may be established from 4 found spreaders (or straddlers) per a recorded or filed reference only if 4 tagged tangent ties are set outside of the vehicle traveled portions of the street such as ‘TOP OF CURB’, ‘ON SIDEWALK’, or ‘BACK OF WALK’. Centerline intersections on manhole covers shall meet all applicable requirements for “FOUND” and “ESTABLISHED” centerline intersection monuments noted above.

In all cases where any centerline monument or centerline tie monument must be set, reset, retagged, or rehabilitated in any manner, or where any measurement or detail on a filed tie note changes, the surveyor shall file a new, original tie note with the County Engineer for field inspection (where applicable) and, after passing inspection, shall file the original tie note with the County Surveyor or City Engineer (where applicable). All “NO REFERENCE” centerline monuments, tagged or not, shall meet the requirements of the County Code and shall, by the recording of the map, be brought into the recorded reference ‘world’ for recorded perpetuation of its current location and for proper use by others.

Additional Notes:
• Where field notes are cited, include an abbreviation in the monument note reference to indicate if the field notes are County , City, State, or other agency. For example, use “L.A. CO. P.W.F.B.” for County Public Works Field Book, “CITY ENG. F.B.” for City Engineer Field Book, “L.A. CO. R.D.F.B.” for County Road Department Field Book, “CO. ENG. F.B.” for County Engineer Field Book, CO. SURVEYOR F.B. for County Surveyor Field Book, or “L.A.C.F.C.D. F.C.” for Los Angeles County Flood Control Field Book.
• The preferred label of a found “LEAD, (BRASS) TACK, AND (BRASS) TAG” is “L, T, & TAG”. The tack must be indicated in the abbreviation. A brass tag set in epoxy may be cited as a record tie reference from a Record of Survey, but shall be replaced with a durable monument if used as a centerline tie monument. A sample monument note shall state, “SET L & T, TAGGED L.S. ####” or “SET LD. & TACK, TAGGED L.S. ####.”
• On a pipe monument, the preferred label of “(BRASS) TACK AND (BRASS) TAG IN A CEMENT PLUG” is “TACK AND TAG IN CEMENT PLUG”. The tack and the type of plug must be indicated in the abbreviation. A brass tag set in epoxy may be cited as a reference from a Record of Survey, but shall be replaced with an acceptable, durable monument if used as a boundary corner or as a monument in any line used to support the boundary establishment. As an example, the monument note shall state, “SET 2” I.P. CEMENT PLUG & TACK, TAGGED L.S. ####. FLUSH.” • State if the centerline intersection falls on a manhole and state the type of manhole. • Cite if a found monument is tagged or not, referenced or not, fits all ties per a reference, and is accepted as the record location being perpetuated on the map.
• Every map shall have acceptable centerline monuments set or found along the centerline at distances not to exceed 1,000 feet or at such lesser distances determined by the County Engineer or City Engineer where applicable. Where topography limits the line of sight between acceptable centerline monuments, additional centerline monuments shall be set or found to ensure a clear line of sight between each centerline monument along the centerline. • All monuments, not set flush, shall state the height of the monument above or below finished surface. • When the map’s scale is too small to correctly label, show, and delineate the leader lines and offset dimensions of a found or set centerline monument not at the point on centerline being perpetuated, the map shall show a detail that clearly and legibly shows and delineates the location of the point on centerline being perpetuated, the location of the centerline monument, and the dimensions from the point on centerline to the centerline monument. For found centerline monuments, the County Engineer may require that an acceptable centerline monument be set at the point on centerline being perpetuated if sufficient working area is available.
• Overlapping text on title lines shall be avoided at all times. Overlapping leader lines on text or title lines shall be avoided.

By: Jeff Owens, L.S., Deputy County Engineer, Subdivision Mapping Section, Land Development Division, Department of Public Works County of Los Angeles
Last Revised: Wednesday, June 25, 2007
EXHIBIT A-1-D
01007.0001/1030700.1
EXHIBIT “C”

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. Consultant shall perform the tasks contained in the Task Orders in accordance with the following and within the budgets established in the Task Orders:

From June 21, 2023 through January 20, 2025 (not June 20, 2024 noted below):

From January 21, 2025 through end of Term:

Service Description Fees
Monthly Building Division fees collected Sliding Scale % $0 to $200,000 63%
$200,001 to $350,000 60%

1. $350,001 to $500,000 2. 55%

3. $500,001 to $750,000 4. 45%

5. $750,001 to $1,000,000 35%

6. Exceeding $1,000,000 7. 25%
The min monthly fee no less than $95,000

8. Building Official Per the schedule of hourly rates

9. Any other staff services 10. Per the schedule of hourly rates

01007.0001/1030700.1
Where no fees collected, or reduced for plan check or permits, entitlement review, LID Compliance , Soils Report, Hydrology Report Reviews and other additional services requested shall be per the hourly standard rates.

Hourly rates are increased each year July 1st automatically by the percentage change Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim California Consumer Price Index -All Urban Consumers (“CPI -U”) for the preceding twelve -month period as calculated for February by the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics and published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics.

There shall be no limitation on the annual amount of compensation to be paid Consultant during the fivethree-year Term with the only compensation limitation being $25,000,000 $20,000,000 over the course of the Term.

II. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task Order, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task sub-budget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.8.

III. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include:

A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.

B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.

C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.

D. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

IV. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed $25,000,000 $20,000,000 as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement.

The Consultant’s billing rates for all personnel are attached as Exhibit C-1.

RESOLUTION NO. 25-010

RESOLUTION NO. 25-010

A RESOLUTION OF THE CARSON CITY COUNCIL APPROVING
A BUDGET TRANSFER IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET

FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO INCREASE THE TRANSTECH
ENGINEERS, INC. CONTRACT BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR.

WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the City’s Fiscal Year (FY) 202 4-25 budget on June 18, 2024 via Resolution No. 24-056; and

WHEREAS, the City has determined it necessary to approve a budget transfer in the FY 2024-25 from the General Fund budget to increase the Transtech Engineers, Inc. contract budget for the fiscal year; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined it necessary to amend the FY 2024-2025 General Fund budget to add funds for the Building and Safety Division;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, FIND, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The following budget transfer will be made to the City’s budget:

Account Division/Object Description Increase/(Decrease) 101-99-999-999-3601 General Fund Reserve ($3,270,000.00) 101-70-785-100-6004

CD Mgt & Control Pro
Svcs
$400,575.00
101-70-785-293-6004

CD Inspection Pro Svcs $1,151,040.00
101-70-785-296-6004

CD Bldg Permt Pro Svcs $634,053.00
101-70-785-297-6004

CD BldgPlanCk Pro Svcs $1,084,332.00

Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall keep a copy of this resolution attached to the FY 202 4-25 budget on file, and effective as of January 21, 2025, the same shall be in force and effect.

RESOLUTION NO. 25-010

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 21 st DAY OF JANUARY 2025.

APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF CARSON

________________________
Sunny Soltani, City Attorney Mayor Lula Davis-Holmes

ATTEST:

____________________________
Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF CARSON )

I, Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk of the City of Carson, California, hereby attest to and certify that the foregoing resolution, being Resolution No. 25-010 adopted by the City of Carson City Council at its meeting held on January 21, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk

CITY OF CARSON

File #: Version:

Report to Honorable Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, January 21, 2025, 5:00 PM
CONSENT 26. To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Dr. Arlington Rodgers, Director of Public Works PW Engineering Subject: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO TOTUM CORP AND FCG CONSULTANTSAGREEMENTS TO PROVIDE ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTIONSERVICES TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (CITY COUNCIL) I. SUMMARY
In 2023, the initial contracts with the two Construction Management firms, Totum Corp., and FCG Consultants Corp., were established based on estimated needs at that time. However, due to limited definition of specific projects during the initial solicitation, the total scope was not fully determined. Since then, the construction projects that both Construction Management firms are managing have been further defined, highlighting a need for additional funding to ensure comprehensive oversight and project quality, and a need to enter into amendments to the contracts to incorporate the same.

II. RECOMMENDATION
TAKE the following actions:

1. APPROVE Amendment No. 1 with Totum Corp. for Construction Management Construction Inspection services increasing the contract sum by $400,000 for a total contract sum of $882,635.00.

2. APPROVE Amendment No. 1 with FCG Consultants Corp. for Construction Management Construction Inspection services increasing the contract sum by $400,000 for a total contract sum of $882,635.00.

3. AUTHORIZE the Mayor to execute contract Amendment No. 1 with Totum Corp. following approval as to form by the City Attorney.

4. AUTHORIZE the Mayor to execute contract Amendment No. 1 with FCG Consultants Corp. following approval as to form by the City Attorney.

III. ALTERNATIVES

1. DO NOT APPROVE the above recommendations.

2. TAKE another action the City Council deems appropriate consistent with the requirements of the Law.

IV. BACKGROUND
701 East Carson Street
Totum Corp. and FCG Consultants Corp. are firms specializing in Construction Management and Construction Inspection (CMCI), delivering comprehensive oversight and quality assurance services that ensure the successful execution of complex projects. With a focus on precision, safety, and efficiency, the CMCI firms provide tailored management solutions that support project stakeholders throughout every phase of construction, from pre- construction planning through completion and turnover. This includes coordinating with contractors, managing schedules, monitoring budgets, ensuring adherence to project specifications, and facilitating effective communication among all parties involved. The CMCI firms' expertise allows them to anticipate and mitigate potential risks, making sure projects remain on track, within scope, and compliant with all regulations.

In July 2023, staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for on-call firms to provide Construction Management and Construction Inspection services. On November 18, 2023, the City Council awarded two separate contracts to Totum Corp., and FCG Consultants Corp. for a not to exceed amount of $482,635.00 each, and effective until FY 25- 26 (Exhibit No. 1 and Exhibit No. 2). During the initial process with both CMCI firms in 2023, staff outlined a provisional scope of work valued at $286,520.00 valid through FY 2024/25, and scope of work valued at $196,115.00 valid through FY25-26 for a total of $482,635.00 valid until June 30, 2026 anticipating that the CMCI firms would support construction projects expected but not yet fully scoped or scheduled.  As these projects have since been further developed, it has become clear that the CMCI firms' services need to expand to accommodate the scope, complexity, and timelines of these more precisely defined projects.  Since the initial engagement, Totum Corp., has been selected to oversee the construction of Foisia Park and Carriage Crest Park, and FCG Consultants Corp. has been selected to oversee the construction of Anderson Park and Community Center Courtyard as well as inspection services of right of way permits.  These projects and task orders, have a combined construction cost over $48M, all of which are considered priority for the City’s facility improvements.  Each firm currently has an estimated balance of $250,000.00 through the end of Fiscal Year 2024/25. It is projected that each firm would have an average monthly billing of $75,000 to provide CMCI services for the aforementioned projects and task orders.

With this projection, their current balance is estimated to be exhausted by mid February 2025.  From mid-February 2025 through end of the fiscal year 2024/25, four and a half months, an additional $400,000 for each firm is needed to cover future invoices through FY 2024/25.  Approval of amendments to the contracts will allow both firms to continue oversight of accurate implementation of the project plans and specifications, adhering to construction schedules, compliance with City and safety regulations, inspection of construction quality, and coordination with various stakeholders to ensure timely project delivery.

Staff recommends amending the agreement with Totum Corp, increasing the contract sum by $400,000 for a total contract sum of $882,635.00 (Exhibit No. 3), and FCG Consultants Corp. increasing the contract sum by $400,000.00 for a total contract sum of $882,635.00 (Exhibit No. 4).

V. FISCAL IMPACT
If the proposed amendments are approved, the FCG Consultants and Totum Corp contracts will each be increased by an additional $400,000.00 for a new total not-to-exceed contract amount of $882,635.00 for each contract.

The requested four hundred thousand ($400,000.00) for the proposed FCG Consultants contract amendment will utilize funds currently allocated in the adopted FY 24/25 budget in account 101-99-999-904-6004.

The requested four hundred thousand ($400,000.00) for the proposed Totum Corps contract amendment will utilize funds currently allocated in the adopted FY 24/25 budget using three separate accounts as follows:
• 101-99-999-904-6004 / $232,430.95
• 101-80-820-100-6004 / $96,828.00
• 101-80-999-904-6004 / $70,741.05
VI. EXHIBITS

1. Totum Corp Original Contract

2. FCG Consultants Original Contract

3. Totem Contract Amendment No. 1

4. FCG Consultants Contract Amendment No. 1
Prepared by: Dr. Arlington Rodgers, Jr., Director of Public Works and Raymond Velasco, P.E, Public Works Operations Manager

Attachments
C-23-304 - TOTUM CONSULTING 2023 DEC 21.pdf
C-24-014 - FCG CONSULTANTS 2024 JANUARY 23.pdf
Totum Amendment 1.pdf
FCG Amendment 1.pdf

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT
SERVICES (“Amendment No. 1”) by and between the CITY OF CARSON, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and TOTUM CORP, a California corporation (“Consultant”), is effective as of the 21st day of January, 2025. City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement for Contract Services dated December 19, 2023 (“Agreement”), whereby Consultant agreed to provide City construction management and inspection services on an on-call basis for a two and one-half year term commencing January 1, 2024 and expiring June 30, 2026, for $482,635.00, with two additional options to extend by one year each.

B. Since commencement of the Term, Consultant has been selected and tasked to oversee the construction of Foisia Park and Carriage Crest Park (“Additional Services”), and as such, an additional $400,000.00 needs to be allocated to this Agreement to allow Consultant to perform such services through June 30, 2025.

C. The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement to specifically prescribe the Additional Services for an additional $400,000.00, thereby increasing the Contract Sum from $482,635.00 to $882,635.00, for that purpose.

D. Section 2611(m)(3) of the Carson Municipal Code (“CMC”) provides that any proposed amendment to a contract exceeding $75,000 requires solicitation unless the amendment concerns a change order under Section 2601(d) of the CMC in which event bidding will not be required irrespective of the amount of the change order.

E. The Additional Services qualify as a change order because they concern a change to the scope of work and price arising out of reasonably unforeseeable circumstances borne out of the original scope of the Agreement. It is a change to the scope of work because it is not included in the Scope of Services and it is borne out of the original Scope of Services because the nature of services is similar to the original scope except the description contains more specificity, and at the time the Parties entered into the Agreement the Additional Services were reasonably unforeseeable.

TERMS

1. Contract Changes. The Agreement is amended as provided herein (added text shown in bold italics, deleted text in strikethrough font).

A. Section 2.1 (Contract Sum) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

“2.1 Contract Sum.

Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed Eight Hundred Eighty-Two Thousand, Six Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars and Zero Cents ($882,635.00) Four Hundred Eighty Two Thousand Six Hundred Thirty Five Dollars and Zero Cents ($482,635.00) (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.8. In the event City elects to exercise its options to extend the Term pursuant to Section 3.4 hereof, the Contract Sum will increase consistent with the additional not to exceed compensation applicable to each Extension Term, as set out in in Exhibit “C.”” B. Exhibit A (Scope of Services) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

See attached.

C. Exhibit C (Schedule of Compensation) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

See attached.

2. Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 1, all provisions of the Agreement, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 1, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 1.

3. Affirmation of Agreement; Warranty Re Absence of Defaults. City and Consultant each ratify and reaffirm each and every one of the respective rights and obligations arising under the Agreement. Each party represents and warrants to the other that there have been no written or oral modifications to the Agreement. Each party represents and warrants to the other that the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 1, is currently an effective, valid, and binding obligation.

Consultant represents and warrants to City that, as of the date of this Amendment No. 1, City is not in default of any material term of the Agreement and that there have been no events that, with the passing of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default under the Agreement.

City represents and warrants to Consultant that, as of the date of this Amendment No. 1, Consultant is not in default of any material term of the Agreement and that there have been no events that, with the passing of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default under the Agreement.

4. Adequate Consideration. The parties hereto irrevocably stipulate and agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the performance of the obligations they have undertaken pursuant to this Amendment No. 1.

5. Authority. The persons executing this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 1, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Amendment No. 1, and (iv) the entering into this Amendment No. 1 does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said party is bound.

6. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original, whether the signatures are originals, electronic, facsimiles or digital. All such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same Amendment No. 1. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 on the date and year first-above written.

CITY:

CITY OF CARSON, a municipal corporation

Lula Davis-Holmes, Mayor
ATTEST:

Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP

Sunny K. Soltani, City Attorney
[vas; rjl]

CONSULTANT:

TOTUM CORP, a California corporation

By:

Name:

Title:

By:

Name:

Title:

Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT’S SIGNATURES

SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS

MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.

EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following Services on an on-call basis, including but not limited to, oversight of construction of Foisia Park and Carriage Crest Park:

II. Consultant will perform Services, if any, in accordance with project-specific Task Orders, as follows:

When the City requests proposals from on-call consultants (including the Consultant) on a project-specific Task Order, and if the City accepts Consultant’s proposal, then the Task Order and Notice to Proceed shall provide in detail Consultant’s Scope of Services on that Task Order. This Agreement does not guarantee that Consultant will be selected to perform services on Task Orders. This Agreement does not provide for Consultant’s compensation except for Consultant’s services rendered pursuant to a Notice to Proceed on a Task Order.

III. Consultant must perform all on-call Services in compliance with the following requirements:

A. Each task shall be indicated by a written request (“Task Order”) produced by the Contract Officer with a description of the work to be performed, and the time desired for completion. All tasks shall be carried out in conformity with all provisions of this Agreement.

B. Consultant must prepare a written description of the requested tasks including all components and subtasks; the costs to perform the task (“Task Budget”), using the itemized fees in Exhibit C, Schedule of Compensation, whenever a requested task is provided for in Exhibit C; explain how the cost was determined; and, a schedule for completion of the task (“Task Completion Date”); which shall all collectively be referred to as the “Task Proposal.”
C. Contract Officer shall in writing approve, modify, or reject the Task Proposal, and may issue a Notice to Proceed.

D. The task shall be performed at a cost not to exceed the Task Budget.

E. Consultant shall complete the task and deliver all deliverables to Contract Officer by the Task Completion Date.

IV. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2 and pursuant to the Task Order’s project-specific Scope of Services, the Contract Officer may require the Consultant to provide the following deliverables, as applicable:

A. Meeting minutes
B. Construction schedule and budget updates
C. Construction Project Close-Out Report
D. Inspection reports
E. Accurate measurements of work completed
F. Summary report of test results
G. Summary report of quality assurance results
V. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

VI. Consultant will utilize qualified personnel with the following titles to perform the Services required by the applicable Task Order. Consultant shall obtain the Contract Officer’s advanced written approval when replacing any individual assigned to perform services on Task Orders:

A. Danny Kaye,Principal, Sr. Construction Project Manager B. Alejandro Pinel, Construction Project Manager
C. Patrick Lappin, Sr. Construction Project Manager
D. Sandra Gonzalez, Sr. Project Manager
E. Ethan Erickson, Project Engineer
F. Henry Graves, QA/QC
G. Koury, Subcontractor, Inspection/Lab Testing

EXHIBIT “C”

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. This Schedule of Compensation governs Consultant’s compensation in the event the Consultant performs services pursuant to a Notice to Proceed on a Task Order. This Agreement does not guarantee that Consultant will be selected to perform services on Task Orders.

The not to exceed compensation amounts are as follows:

July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025 - $94,250.00
July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 – $192,270.00*$592,270.00 July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 – $196,115.00*
Total: $482,635.00 $882,635.00

July 1, 2027 through June 30, 2028 – $200,037.00 (extension period)* July 1, 2028 through June 30, 2029 – $204,038 (extension period)* *Amount reflects 2% increase from prior year.

II. Consultant responding to the City’s request for proposals on a project-specific Task Order shall establish a Task Budget for the Task Order, identifying the subtasks based on the time and rates of the personnel performing the subtasks, and itemizing all materials and equipment utilized and the costs thereof. If payment is to be made other than at completion of the services, then the phases of the performance and percentage of payment due shall also be shown in the Task Proposal. Consultant’s proposals on Task Orders shall be based on hourly rates identical to the rates attached as Exhibit C-1.

III. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include:

A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.

B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.

C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.

D. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

IV. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed $482,635.00$882,635.00 as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement.

V. The Consultant’s billing rates for all personnel are attached as Exhibit C-1.

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT
SERVICES (“Amendment No. 1”) by and between the CITY OF CARSON, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and FCG CONSULTANTS INC., a California corporation (“Consultant”), is effective as of the 21st day of January, 2025. City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement for Contract Services dated January 1, 2024 (“Agreement”), whereby Consultant agreed to provide City construction management and inspection services on an on-call basis for a two and one-half year term commencing January 1, 2024 and expiring June 30, 2026, for $482,635.00, with two additional options to extend by one year each.

B. Since commencement of the Term, Consultant has been selected and tasked to oversee the construction of Anderson Park and Community Center Courtyard as well as provide inspection services for right of way permits (“Additional Services”), and as such, an additional $400,000.00 needs to be allocated to this Agreement to allow Consultant to perform such services through June 30, 2025.

C. The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement to specifically prescribe the Additional Services for an additional $400,000.00, thereby increasing the Contract Sum from $482,635.00 to $882,635.00, for that purpose.

D. Section 2611(m)(3) of the Carson Municipal Code (“CMC”) provides that any proposed amendment to a contract exceeding $75,000 requires solicitation unless the amendment concerns a change order under Section 2601(d) of the CMC in which event bidding will not be required irrespective of the amount of the change order.

E. The Additional Services qualify as a change order because they concern a change to the scope of work and price arising out of reasonably unforeseeable circumstances borne out of the original scope of the Agreement. It is a change to the scope of work because it is not included in the Scope of Services and it is borne out of the original Scope of Services because the nature of services is similar to the original scope except the description contains more specificity, and at the time the Parties entered into the Agreement the Additional Services were reasonably unforeseeable.

TERMS

1. Contract Changes. The Agreement is amended as provided herein (added text shown in bold italics, deleted text in strikethrough font).

A. Section 2.1 (Contract Sum) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

“2.1 Contract Sum.

Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed Eight Hundred Eighty-Two Thousand, Six Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars and Zero Cents ($882,635.00) Four Hundred Eighty Two Thousand Six Hundred Thirty Five Dollars and Zero Cents ($482,635.00) (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.8. In the event City elects to exercise its options to extend the Term pursuant to Section 3.4 hereof, the Contract Sum will increase consistent with the additional not to exceed compensation applicable to each Extension Term, as set out in in Exhibit “C.”” B. Exhibit A (Scope of Services) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

See attached.

C. Exhibit C (Schedule of Compensation) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

See attached.

2. Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 1, all provisions of the Agreement, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 1, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 1.

3. Affirmation of Agreement; Warranty Re Absence of Defaults. City and Consultant each ratify and reaffirm each and every one of the respective rights and obligations arising under the Agreement. Each party represents and warrants to the other that there have been no written or oral modifications to the Agreement. Each party represents and warrants to the other that the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 1, is currently an effective, valid, and binding obligation.

Consultant represents and warrants to City that, as of the date of this Amendment No. 1, City is not in default of any material term of the Agreement and that there have been no events that, with the passing of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default under the Agreement.

City represents and warrants to Consultant that, as of the date of this Amendment No. 1, Consultant is not in default of any material term of the Agreement and that there have been no events that, with the passing of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default under the Agreement.

4. Adequate Consideration. The parties hereto irrevocably stipulate and agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the performance of the obligations they have undertaken pursuant to this Amendment No. 1.

5. Authority. The persons executing this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 1, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Amendment No. 1, and (iv) the entering into this Amendment No. 1 does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said party is bound.

6. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original, whether the signatures are originals, electronic, facsimiles or digital. All such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same Amendment No. 1. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 on the date and year first-above written.

CITY:

CITY OF CARSON, a municipal corporation

Lula Davis-Holmes, Mayor
ATTEST:

Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP

Sunny K. Soltani, City Attorney
[vas; rjl]

CONSULTANT:

FCG CONSULTANTS INC.,
a California corporation

By:

Name:

Title:

By:

Name:

Title:

Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT’S SIGNATURES

SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS

MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.

EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following Services on an on-call basis, including but not limited to, oversight of construction of Anderson Park and Community Center Courtyard as well as inspection services of right of way permits:

II. Consultant will perform Services, if any, in accordance with project-specific Task Orders, as follows:

When the City requests proposals from on-call consultants (including the Consultant) on a project-specific Task Order, and if the City accepts Consultant’s proposal, then the Task Order and Notice to Proceed shall provide in detail Consultant’s Scope of Services on that Task Order. This Agreement does not guarantee that Consultant will be selected to perform services on Task Orders. This Agreement does not provide for Consultant’s compensation except for Consultant’s services rendered pursuant to a Notice to Proceed on a Task Order.

III. Consultant must perform all on-call Services in compliance with the following requirements:

A. Each task shall be indicated by a written request (“Task Order”) produced by the Contract Officer with a description of the work to be performed, and the time desired for completion. All tasks shall be carried out in conformity with all provisions of this Agreement.

B. Consultant must prepare a written description of the requested tasks including all components and subtasks; the costs to perform the task (“Task Budget”), using the itemized fees in Exhibit C, Schedule of Compensation, whenever a requested task is provided for in Exhibit C; explain how the cost was determined; and, a schedule for completion of the task (“Task Completion Date”); which shall all collectively be referred to as the “Task Proposal.”
C. Contract Officer shall in writing approve, modify, or reject the Task Proposal, and may issue a Notice to Proceed.

D. The task shall be performed at a cost not to exceed the Task Budget.

E. Consultant shall complete the task and deliver all deliverables to Contract Officer by the Task Completion Date.

IV. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2 and pursuant to the Task Order’s project-specific Scope of Services, the Contract Officer may require the Consultant to provide the following deliverables, as applicable:

A. Meeting minutes
B. Construction schedule and budget updates
C. Construction Project Close-Out Report
D. Inspection reports
E. Accurate measurements of work completed
F. Summary report of test results
G. Summary report of quality assurance results
V. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

VI. Consultant will utilize qualified personnel with the following titles to perform the Services required by the applicable Task Order. Consultant shall obtain the Contract Officer’s advanced written approval when replacing any individual assigned to perform services on Task Orders:

A. A.B. Fakhouri, PE, Project Manager, Resident Engineer, Construction Manager B. Fabian Aoun, PE, Project Manager, Resident Engineer, Construction Manager C. Ray H. Fakhoury, PE, Project Manager, Construction Manager D. Michael St. Jacques, PE, Project Manager, Resident Engineer, Structures Rep, Construction Manager, Building Inspector
E. Mohamed Taleb, PE, Project Manager, Structures Rep, Building Inspector F. William Viets, PE, Project Manager, Resident Engineer, Construction Manager G. Hussam Ankir, PE, Structures Rep
H. Kal Lambaz, Construction Manager
I. Anthony Moussa, Construction Manager, Construction Inspector, Electrical Inspector
J. Don Lewis, Construction Inspector
K. Mark Korando, Construction Inspector, Electrical Inspector, Permit Inspector L. Talal Alfakhouri, Construction Inspector, SWPPP
M. Casey Morales, Construction Inspector, Electrical Inspector, Permit Inspector N. Bill Fernandez, Construction Inspector, Building Inspector, Permit Inspector, SWPPP
O. Joe Ruzicka, Construction Inspector
P. Tyler Haddadin, Construction Inspector, SWPPP
Q. Mamon Subeh, Construction Inspector, Building Inspector R. Moji Shahkarami, Construction Inspector
S. Walid Naouchi, Construction Inspector
T. David Alcala, Construction Inspector, Permit Inspector U. Jim Greenfield, Construction Inspector
V. Majed Moussa, Construction Inspector, Office Engineers/Labor Compliance W. Shanton Rangi, Construction Inspector, Building Inspector X. James Bonelli, Construction Inspector, Building Inspector, SWPPP Y. Leon Fuentes, Electrical Inspector
Z. Kelvin Nguyen, Electrical Inspector
AA. Timmy To, Electrical Inspector
BB. Bo Fuentes, Electrical Inspector
CC. Jose Carlos, Electrical Inspector
DD. Darren Hopper, Building Inspector
EE. Carey Brobeck, Building Inspector
FF. John Spath, Building Inspector
GG. Richard Shirley, Landscape Inspector
HH. Heber Villela, Welding Inspector
II. Jasmine Fakhour, Office Engineers/Labor Compliance
JJ. Samar Alfakhouri, Office Engineers/Labor Compliance KK. Ladayu Consulting Group (LCG), Subconsultant

EXHIBIT “C”

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. This Schedule of Compensation governs Consultant’s compensation in the event the Consultant performs services pursuant to a Notice to Proceed on a Task Order. This Agreement does not guarantee that Consultant will be selected to perform services on Task Orders.

The not to exceed compensation amounts are as follows:

July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025 - $94,250.00
July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 – $192,270.00*$592,270.00 July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 – $196,115.00*
Total: $482,635.00 $882,635.00

July 1, 2027 through June 30, 2028 – $200,037.00 (extension period)* July 1, 2028 through June 30, 2029 – $204,038 (extension period)* *Amount reflects 2% increase from prior year.

II. Consultant responding to the City’s request for proposals on a project-specific Task Order shall establish a Task Budget for the Task Order, identifying the subtasks based on the time and rates of the personnel performing the subtasks, and itemizing all materials and equipment utilized and the costs thereof. If payment is to be made other than at completion of the services, then the phases of the performance and percentage of payment due shall also be shown in the Task Proposal. Consultant’s proposals on Task Orders shall be based on hourly rates identical to the rates attached as Exhibit C-1.

III. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include:

A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.

B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.

C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.

D. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

IV. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed $482,635.00$882,635.00 as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement.

V. The Consultant’s billing rates for all personnel are attached as Exhibit C-1.

"

CITY OF CARSON

File #: Version:

Report to Honorable Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, January 21, 2025, 5:00 PM
CONSENT 27. To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Dr. Arlington Rodgers, Director of Public Works PW Engineering Subject: CONSIDER THE APPROVAL AND RATIFICATION OF AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF CREDITS FORTHE REQUIRED MITIGATION MEASURE FOR PROJECT 675 - SEPULVEDA BRIDGE WIDENING PROJECT(CITY COUNCIL) I. SUMMARY
As part of the permitting process for the proposed Project 675 - Sepulveda Bridge Widening project, staff is seeking City Council approval and ratification of Agreement for Sale of Credits needed for the required mitigation measures to allow construction of the Bridge Widening over the Dominguez Channel. These credits are an essential part of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's (Water Board) requirement to compensate for the loss due to unavoidable and adverse impact to the waters of the State of California during construction. Due to time constraints beyond City's control, the Agreement needed to be executed prior to Council approval and therefore, has already been fully executed and staff is now requesting the City Council to approve and ratify the Agreement which will allow staff to secure the permits required for the construction of bridge widening on Sepulveda Boulevard over the Dominguez Channel (Exhibit No. 1).

II. RECOMMENDATION
TAKE the following actions:

1. APPROVE and RATIFY the Agreement for Sale of Credits between Land Veritas Corp. and the City of Carson for the purchase of credit for $50,000.

2. AUTHORIZE and RATIFY execution of the Agreement with Land Veritas Corp. by the Public Works Director following approval as to form by the City Attorney.

III. ALTERNATIVES

1. DO NOT APPROVE the above recommendation. However, staff will not be able to obtain permit from theWater Board and proceed with the work.2. TAKE another action the City Council deems appropriate consistent with the requirements of the Law.

IV. BACKGROUND
701 East Carson Street
The City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) calls for the design and construction of Project No. 675: Sepulveda Boulevard Bridge Widening from Alameda Street to the East City Limit. The project involves the widening and improvement of the roadway and bridge along Sepulveda Boulevard to provide three lanes of traffic in both directions, construction of new sidewalk, relocation of existing Southern California Edison's (SCE) electrical lines, and the modification of the existing traffic signal. This critical infrastructure improvement project aims to enhance traffic flow, pedestrian safety, and overall transportation efficiency along the Sepulveda corridor.

During the permitting application process, it was determined that the project would have an adverse impact to the waters of the State of California during construction. To compensate for the loss, the Water Board is requiring that

0.10 acre of tributary stream system be mitigated which is infeasible due to the proximity of the project to heavy industry and tidal influence. In lieu of implementing on-site mitigation, which would have significantly increased the long-term cost of maintenance, the Water Board authorized the City to purchase credits to fulfill the required mitigation measures. This approach not only ensures compliance with environmental regulations but also aligns with cost-effective practices by leveraging established mitigation bank. The purchase of credits from an approved mitigation bank has been identified as the most effective solution. Land Veritas Corp., the bank sponsor, operates an approved mitigation bank that meets the project requirements. The Water Board has authorized the City to purchase mitigation measures from this sponsor.

The project requires permitting from multiple agencies due to being over the Dominguez Channel and proximity to tidal influence. These agencies include Los Angeles County Flood Control District, California Fish and Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the US Army Corps of Engineers.

The Agreement for Sale of Credits was prepared by Land Veritas Corp., ensuring compliance with the necessary mitigation requirements. The terms of the agreement have been reviewed by the City Attorney, and found to be consistent with the City's policies and financial framework.  Approval of Agreement for Sale of Credit is necessary in order to advance Project No. 675. It will enable staff to proceed ensuring the project's success. Staff is requesting the City Council to approve and ratify the Agreement which will allow staff to secure the permits required for the construction of bridge widening on Sepulveda Boulevard over the Dominguez Channel.

V. FISCAL IMPACT
The purchase of credits for the mitigation measures will utilize funds currently allocated in the adopted FY 24/25budget from account 284-80-820-904-8009.

VI. EXHIBITS

1. Contract for Agreement of Sale of Credits

2. Invoice for Sale of Mitigation Credits
Prepared by: Gilbert Marquez, P.E., City Engineer; Kenneth Young, PE Senior Civil Engineer

"
Attachments
Contract for Agreement of Sale of Credits
Invoice for Sale of Mitigation Credits
Soquel Canyon Mitigation Bank 1 Exhibit F-2 Version Date: 12-14-2018

AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF CREDITS
RWQCB FILE NO. 21-065
This Agreement is entered into this day of , 2024, by and between the Land Veritas Corp (Bank Sponsor) and City of Carson, a municipal corporation (Project Proponent), jointly referred to as the “Parties,” as follows:

RECITALS
A. The Bank Sponsor has developed the Soquel Canyon Mitigation Bank (Bank) located in San Bernardino and Orange Counties, California; and B. The Bank has been developed pursuant to a Bank Enabling Instrument entered into by and between Bank Sponsor, Land Veritas I, LLC, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) on December 15, 2014 and is currently in good standing with these agencies; and C. Project Proponent is seeking to implement the project described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto (Project), which would unavoidably and adversely impact waters of the State thereon, and seeks to compensate for the loss of the same by purchasing credits from Bank Sponsor; and

D. Project Proponent has been authorized by the RWQCB File No. 21-065, to purchase from the Bank 0.10 acres of 404 Perennial Stream System Credits (“Credits”) upon confirmation by the Bank Sponsor of credit availability/adequate balance of credits remaining for sale; and

E. Project Proponent desires to purchase from Bank Sponsor and Bank Sponsor desires to sell to Project Proponent the Credits;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Bank Sponsor hereby sells to Project Proponent and Project Proponent hereby purchases from Bank Sponsor Credits from the Bank for the purchase price of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000). The Bank Sponsor will then deliver to Project Proponent an executed Bill of Sale in the manner and form as attached hereto and marked Exhibit “B”. The purchase price for said Credits shall be paid by cashier’s check or, at the option of Bank Sponsor, wire transfer of funds according to written instructions by Bank Sponsor to Project Proponent.

2. The sale and transfer herein is not intended as a sale or transfer to Project Proponent of a security, license, lease, easement, or possessory or non-possessory interest in real property, nor the granting of any interest of the foregoing.

3. Project Proponent shall have no obligation whatsoever by reason of the purchase of the Credits, to support, pay for, monitor, report on, sustain, continue in perpetuity, or otherwise be obligated or liable for the success or continued expense or maintenance in perpetuity of the Docusign Envelope ID: 145B5F32-E67A-45D7-9298-916A6A3D5919 December20th
Soquel Canyon Mitigation Bank 2 Exhibit F-2 Version Date: 12-14-2018 Credits sold, or the Bank. Pursuant to the BEI and any amendments thereto, Bank Sponsor shall monitor and make reports to the appropriate agency or agencies on the status of any Credits sold to Project Proponent. Bank Sponsor shall be fully and completely responsible for satisfying any and all conditions placed on the Bank or the Credits by all state or federal jurisdictional agencies.

4. The Credits sold and transferred to Project Proponent shall be non-transferable and non-assignable and shall not be used as compensatory mitigation for any other p roject or purpose, except as set forth herein.

5. Project Proponent must exercise his/her/its right to purchase the Credits within 30 days of the date of this Agreement. After the 30-day period this Agreement will be considered null and void.

6. Upon purchase of the Credits specified in paragraph 1 above, the Bank Sponsor shall submit to the parties listed in the Notices section of the BEI, copies of the: a) Agreement for Sale of Credits; b) Bill of Sale; c) Payment Receipt; and d) an updated ledger. The updated ledger must detail: i) Project Proponent; ii) Project Name; iii) Status (sale complete/sale not complete); iv) Credit Sale Date; v) Permitting Agency File/Tracking Number; vi) Total Number of Credits Authorized to Sell ; vii) Total Number of Credits Sold to D ate (inclusive); and viii) Balance of all Credits Available. The ledger should include all sales data from Bank Establishment Date to the present.

7. The signatures pages to this Agreement may be delivered via facsimile, electronic mail (including PDF or any other electronic signature complying with the U.S. federal ESIGN Act of 2000; e.g., DocuSign) or other transmission method, and any signature so delivered shall be deemed to have been duly and validly delivered and be valid and effective for all purposes.

[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK; SIGNATURES TO FOLLOW]

Docusign Envelope ID: 145B5F32-E67A-45D7-9298-916A6A3D5919 Soquel Canyon Mitigation Bank 3 Exhibit F-2 Version Date: 12-14-2018 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written.

BANK SPONSOR

LAND VERITAS CORP

By: _______________________________________ Date: __________________

Nathan Bello, on behalf of H. Tracey Brownfield, President

PROJECT PROPONENT

CITY OF CARSON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
By: ______________________________________ Date: _________________

Name: ___________________________________________________

Its: ______________________________________________________

ATTEST:

By: ______________________________________ Date: _________________ Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
By: ______________________________________ Date: _________________ Sunny K. Soltani, City Attorney
Docusign Envelope ID: 145B5F32-E67A-45D7-9298-916A6A3D5919 12/24/2024
Public Works Director
Dr. Arlington Rodgers, Jr.
12/25/2024
1/6/2025
1/6/2025

Soquel Canyon Mitigation Bank 4 Exhibit F-2 Version Date: 12-14-2018 EXHIBIT “A”

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT TO BE MITIGATED

Name of Project:

Sepulveda Boulevard Widening Project

Project Location:

Sepulveda Boulevard from East of Alameda Street to East City Limit

Permitting Agency(ies) File/Tracking Number:

RWQCB File No. 21-065

Project Description:

The Project involves the widening and improvement of the roadway and bridge over Dominguez Channel along Sepulveda Boulevard to provide three lanes of traffic in both directions, construction of new sidewalks, relocation of existing electrical lines, and the modification of the existing traffic signal.

Docusign Envelope ID: 145B5F32-E67A-45D7-9298-916A6A3D5919 Soquel Canyon Mitigation Bank 5 Exhibit F-2 Version Date: 12-14-2018 EXHIBIT “B”

BILL OF SALE

RWQCB File No. 21-065

In consideration of $50,000, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Land Veritas Corp (Bank Sponsor) does hereby bargain, sell and transfer to City of Carson, a municipal corporation (Project Proponent), 0.10 acres of 404 Perennial Stream System Credits (Credits) in the Soquel Canyon Mitigation Bank in San Bernardino and Orange Counties, California, developed, and approved under the authority of the United States Army Corps of Engineers and/or California Department of Fish and Wildlife associated the Project described in Exhibit A.

Bank Sponsor represents and warrants that it has good title to the Credits, has good right to sell the same, and that they are free and clear of all claims, liens, or encumbrances.

Bank Sponsor covenants and agrees with the Project Proponent to warrant and defend the sale of the Credits hereinbefore described against all and every person and persons whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same.

DATED: ______________________________________

Land Veritas Corp

By: ___________________________________________
Nathan Bello, on behalf of H. Tracey Brownfield, President Docusign Envelope ID: 145B5F32-E67A-45D7-9298-916A6A3D5919 Soquel Canyon Mitigation Bank 6 Exhibit F-2 Version Date: 12-14-2018 EXHIBIT “C”

SOQUEL CANYON MITIGATION BANK

PAYMENT RECEIPT

PROJECT PROPONENT INFORMATION
Name:

City of Carson, a municipal corporation
Address:
701 E. Carson Street
Carson, CA, 90746
Telephone:
(310) 952-1700 ext. 1812
Contact:

Kenneth Young, Senior Civil Engineer

PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Description:

The Project involves the widening and improvement of the roadway and bridge over Dominguez Channel along Sepulveda Boulevard to provide three lanes of traffic in both directions, construction of new sidewalks, relocation of existing electrical lines, and the modification of the existing traffic signal.

Project Location:

Sepulveda Boulevard from East of Alameda Street to East City Limit Agency File/Tracking Number:

RWQCB File No. 21-065
Species/Habitat Affected:

Non-wetland waters, 0.1 acre
Docusign Envelope ID: 145B5F32-E67A-45D7-9298-916A6A3D5919 Soquel Canyon Mitigation Bank 7 Exhibit F-2 Version Date: 12-14-2018 Credits to be Purchased:

0.10 acres of 404 Perennial Stream System Credits

PAYMENT INFORMATION
Payee:

Land Veritas Corp
Payer:

City of Carson, a municipal corporation
Amount:
$50,000

Method of payment:

Cash ___ Check No. __________ Money Order No. _________

Received by:
_______________________________________
Nathan Bello, on behalf of H. Tracey Brownfield, President

Date:

Docusign Envelope ID: 145B5F32-E67A-45D7-9298-916A6A3D5919

Land Veritas Corp 1001 Bridgeway, Suite 246, Sausalito CA 94965 p 415.729.3734

Soquel Canyon Mitigation Bank
Invoice for Sale of Mitigation Credits
Invoice Date: January 6, 2025 Invoice Number: SC-2024-17

Project Proponent
City of Carson, a municipal corporation
701 E. Carson Street
Carson, CA, 90746

Project: City of Carson - Sepulveda Boulevard Widening Project

Credit Type Acreage
404 Perennial Stream System Credits 0.10
Total Acres: 0.10
Total Cost: $50,000
Total Balance Due: $50,000

Payment Instructions

Payment can be made via wire transfer, ACH payment, or check. • For wire transfer and ACH instructions, please see attached wiring instructions and contact WRA for the full account number
• Payments by check should be made out to Land Veritas Corp.

Wire Transfer and ACH Instructions:

WRA, Inc.

Marlene Tyner-Valencourt
[email protected]
(858) 682-2699
Financial Institution: JP Morgan Chase Bank
Check Payment Mailing Address
Land Veritas Corp.
1001 Bridgeway, Suite 246
Sausalito, CA 94965
Please contact Land Veritas with questions:
[email protected]

Thank you for your business!

Wiring Instructions
Wire to :

ABA Wire Transfer No. :

ACH / Direct Deposit No.:

Credit Account No.:

Account Name :

JP Morgan Chase NA
021000021
322271627
XXXXX6587
Land Veritas Corp. Transfer Account

Form W-9
(Rev. March 2024)
Request for Taxpayer
Identification Number and Certification
Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service Go to www.irs.gov/FormW9 for instructions and the latest information.

Give form to the
requester. Do not
send to the IRS.

Before you begin. For guidance related to the purpose of Form W-9, see Purpose of Form, below.

Print or type.

See Specific Instructions on page 3.
1 Name of entity/individual. An entry is required. (For a sole proprietor or disregarded entity, enter the owner’s name on line 1, and enter the business/disregarded entity’s name on line 2.)
2 Business name/disregarded entity name, if different from above. 3a Check the appropriate box for federal tax classification of the entity/individual whose name is entered on line 1. Check only one of the following seven boxes.

Individual/sole proprietor C corporation S corporation Partnership Trust/estate LLC. Enter the tax classification (C = C corporation, S = S corporation, P = Partnership) ....

Note: Check the “LLC” box above and, in the entry space, enter the appropriate code (C, S, or P) for the tax classification of the LLC, unless it is a disregarded entity. A disregarded entity should instead check the appropriate box for the tax classification of its owner.

Other (see instructions)
3b If on line 3a you checked “Partnership” or “Trust/estate,” or checked “LLC” and entered “P” as its tax classification, and you are providing this form to a partnership, trust, or estate in which you have an ownership interest, check this box if you have any foreign partners, owners, or beneficiaries. See instructions ......... 4 Exemptions (codes apply only to
certain entities, not individuals;
see instructions on page 3):

Exempt payee code (if any)
Exemption from Foreign Account Tax
Compliance Act (FATCA) reporting
code (if any)
(Applies to accounts maintained
outside the United States.)
5 Address (number, street, and apt. or suite no.). See instructions. 6 City, state, and ZIP code
Requester’s name and address (optional)
7 List account number(s) here (optional)
Part I Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)
Enter your TIN in the appropriate box. The TIN provided must match the name given on line 1 to avoid backup withholding. For individuals, this is generally your social security number (SSN). However, for a resident alien, sole proprietor, or disregarded entity, see the instructions for Part I, later. For other entities, it is your employer identification number (EIN). If you do not have a number, see How to get a TIN, later.

Note: If the account is in more than one name, see the instructions for line 1. See also What Name and Number To Give the Requester for guidelines on whose number to enter.

Social security number
––
or
Employer identification number
–
Part II Certification
Under penalties of perjury, I certify that:

1. The number shown on this form is my correct taxpayer identification number (or I am waiting for a number to be issued to me); and

2. I am not subject to backup withholding because (a) I am exempt from backup withholding, or (b) I have not been notified by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that I am subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest or dividends, or (c) the IRS has notified me that I am no longer subject to backup withholding; and

3. I am a U.S. citizen or other U.S. person (defined below); and

4. The FATCA code(s) entered on this form (if any) indicating that I am exempt from FATCA reporting is correct.

Certification instructions. You must cross out item 2 above if you have been notified by the IRS that you are currently subject to backup withholding because you have failed to report all interest and dividends on your tax return. For real estate transactions, item 2 does not apply. For mortgage interest paid, acquisition or abandonment of secured property, cancellation of debt, contributions to an individual retirement arrangement (IRA), and, generally, payments other than interest and dividends, you are not required to sign the certification, but you must provide your correct TIN. See the instructions for Part II, later.

Sign
Here
Signature of
U.S. person Date
General Instructions
Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise noted.

Future developments. For the latest information about developments related to Form W-9 and its instructions, such as legislation enacted after they were published, go to www.irs.gov/FormW9.

What’s New
Line 3a has been modified to clarify how a disregarded entity completes this line. An LLC that is a disregarded entity should check the appropriate box for the tax classification of its owner. Otherwise, it should check the “LLC” box and enter its appropriate tax classification.

New line 3b has been added to this form. A flow-through entity is required to complete this line to indicate that it has direct or indirect foreign partners, owners, or beneficiaries when it provides the Form W-9 to another flow-through entity in which it has an ownership interest. This change is intended to provide a flow-through entity with information regarding the status of its indirect foreign partners, owners, or beneficiaries, so that it can satisfy any applicable reporting requirements. For example, a partnership that has any indirect foreign partners may be required to complete Schedules K-2 and K-3. See the Partnership Instructions for Schedules K-2 and K-3 (Form 1065).

Purpose of Form
An individual or entity (Form W-9 requester) who is required to file an information return with the IRS is giving you this form because they Cat. No. 10231X Form W-9 (Rev. 3-2024)
Land Veritas Corp.
✔
5 1001 Bridgeway #246
Sausalito, CA 94965
27 2964141
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6289B574-23EF-4F80-8E8E-403C14EDCE9B 6/25/2024

CITY OF CARSON

File #: Version:

Report to Honorable Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, January 21, 2025, 5:00 PM
DISCUSSION 28. To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Reata Kulcsar, Energy and Sustainability Officer CMO  Subject: CONSIDER INTRODUCING ORDINANCE NO. 25-2501, AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION3251.11 (ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING SPACES AND RESTRICTIONS) TO PART 6 (PARKINGREGULATIONS) OF CHAPTER 2 (TRAFFIC REGULATIONS) OF THE CARSON MUNICIPAL CODE TOAUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO DESIGNATE ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING SPACES INOFFSTREET PARKING FACILITIES OWNED AND OPERATED BY THE CITY, AND TO ESTABLISH PARKINGRESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO SUCH DESIGNATED SPACES (CITY COUNCIL) I. SUMMARY
The proposed ordinance will add Section 3251.11 to the Carson Municipal Code, authorizing the Public Works Director to designate specific stalls in City-owned offstreet parking facilities exclusively for electric vehicle (EV) charging. This means that only vehicles which are actively charging can park in these designated spaces, and non- electric vehicles will be prohibited from using the designated parking stalls.

To ensure compliance, signs will be placed in these areas to inform users about the rules and violations for unauthorized parking. The ordinance is designed to promote sustainable and alternative transportation, maximize the use of electric vehicles, and improve parking management.

II. RECOMMENDATION
INTRODUCE for first reading, by title only and with full reading waived, Ordinance No. 25-2501, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 3251.11 (ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING SPACES AND RESTRICTIONS) TO PART 6 (PARKING REGULATIONS) OF CHAPTER 2 (TRAFFIC

REGULATIONS) OF THE CARSON MUNICIPAL CODE TO AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO DESIGNATE ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING SPACES IN OFFSTREET PARKING FACILITIES OWNED AND OPERATED BY THE CITY, AND TO ESTABLISH PARKING RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO SUCH DESIGNATED SPACES." III. ALTERNATIVES
DO NOT Introduce Ordinance No. 25-2501.

IV. BACKGROUND
701 East Carson Street
The City owns and operates various off-street parking facilities, each with multiple parking spaces. Some of these facilities are currently equipped with, or may be equipped in the future with, electric vehicle charging stations and the necessary infrastructure to support electric vehicles.

California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 22511 authorizes local authorities to “designate” spaces in their offstreet parking facilities for the exclusive purpose of charging and parking an EV that is connected for electric charging purposes. Section 22511(a)(1) reads:
“A local authority, by ordinance or resolution, and a person in lawful possession of an off-street parking facility may designate stalls or spaces in an off-street parking facility owned or operated by that local authority or person for the exclusive purpose of charging and parking a vehicle that is connected for electric charging purposes.”
Designating and enforcing these spaces as exclusively for the parking of electric vehicles that are connected for electric charging purposes is necessary to ensure that the charging stations remain available to be used for charging electric vehicles rather than being obstructed by non-EV's that seek to simply park in the spaces. The proposed ordinance makes clear that the EV's must be actually charging to use the designated spaces, meaning they cannot be left in the designated space once they have completed charging, even if they are still plugged in.

The Public Works Director would have discretion to determine what spaces are designated for these purposes, and when.

The proposed ordinance also makes clear that parking time limit restrictions pursuant to CMC Section 3251.6 may be enforced as to the designated spaces in addition to the charging requirements, to prevent a situation where, for example, an EV that takes many hours to charge could be left in a designated space for longer than the maximum parking time limit that the City allows for the space, which is set by indicating the time limit on appropriate signs or markings.

The proposed ordinance will ensure that the designated spaces can be utilized effectively, with flexibility for changes to be made quickly by the authority of the Public Works Director when the need arises, and promotes sustainable and alternative modes of transportation. The initiative aims to manage off-street parking availability in a way that could encourage more people to choose to drive electric vehicles.

Each off-street parking facility with designated spaces must also have a sign that informs users about the rules regarding unauthorized parking of vehicles not connected for electric charging purposes, as specified in the ordinance. The fabrication and installation of these signs will be coordinated with the Public Works Department.

Violations would be punishable by infraction citations as provided in subsection (f) of the proposed new CMC Section 3251.11, and by removal of vehicles as provided in subsection (g) of said Section 3251.11.

V. FISCAL IMPACT
It is estimated that 25 signs and posts will be needed, and the cost to fabricate and install them is approximately $5,000. Funding is available in account no. 246-80-820-904-6009.

The added authority to cite and tow vehicles that are illegally parked at EV charging-designated spaces is expected to generate additional parking citation revenue for the General Fund. While the exact amount of this revenue is currently unknown, it may increase in the coming years as more EV charging stations are installed citywide.

VI. EXHIBITS

1. Ordinance No. 25-2501

Attachments
Ordinance No. 25-2501 (EV Parking)(1025225.3).pdf

01007.0001/1025225.3

Ordinance No. 25-2501

Page 1 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 25-2501

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 3251.11 (ELECTRIC VEHICLE
PARKING SPACES AND RESTRICTIONS) TO PART 6 (PARKING
REGULATIONS) OF CHAPTER 2 (TRAFFIC REGULATIONS) OF THE

CARSON MUNICIPAL CODE TO AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS

DIRECTOR TO DESIGNATE ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING SPACES

IN OFFSTREET PARKING FACILITIES OWNED AND OPERATED BY

THE CITY, AND TO ESTABLISH PARKING RESTRICTIONS

APPLICABLE TO SUCH DESIGNATED SPACES

WHEREAS, the City owns and operates various offstreet parking facilities containing parking stalls or spaces that are equipped or may be equipped with electric vehicle charging stations and/or infrastructure; and

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the Public Works Director to designate parking stalls or spaces within offstreet parking facilities owned and operated by the City for the exclusive purpose of charging and parking a vehicle that is connected for elect ric charging purposes, pursuant to Sections 22511 and 22511.1 of the California Vehicle Code . Additionally, the City Council desires to further restrict the parking, stopping or standing of vehicles in the designated parking stalls or spaces in such offstreet parking facilities pursuant to Section 22519 of the California Vehicle Code, insofar as such authority is necessary for the City to prohibit electric vehicles from remaining in such spaces or stalls (whether they are still connected to the charging station or not) after they have completed charging, as is intended by this Ordinance; and

WHEREAS, the electric vehicle parking standards established in this Ordinance are intended to promote sustainable and alternative transportation practices; manage the availability of off -street parking, particularly in areas that will maximize the use of electric vehicles; and thereby improve traffic and parking circulation.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON, CALIFORNIA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1 . RECITALS. The foregoing recital s are true and corr ect, and are incorporated herein by this reference as findings of fact.

SECTION 2. AMENDMENT. Section 3251.11 is hereby added to Part 6 (Parking Regulations) of Chapter 2 (Traffic Regulations) of the Carson Municipal Code, to read in its entirety as follows:

“3251.11 Electric Vehicle Designated Parking Spaces and Restrictions.

(a) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to promote sustainable and alternative transportation practices; manage the availability of off -street parking, particularly in areas that will maximize the use of electric vehicles; and thereby improve traffic and parking circulation.

01007.0001/1025225.3

Ordinance No. 25-2501

Page 2 ends

(b) Designation of Parking Spaces . The Public Works Director, or designee, is authorized in accordance with the purposes of this section to designate stalls or spaces in offstreet parking facilities owned a nd operated by the City for the exclusive purpose of charging and parking a vehicle that is connected for electric charging purposes.

(c) Posting of Signs. The posting required for a stall or space designated pursuant to subsection (b) of this section shall consist of a sign not less than 17 by 22 inches in size with lettering not less than one inch in height that clearly and conspicuously states the following (with the information referenced in the parentheticals to be filled in pursuant to the direction of the Public Works Director, or designee):
“Unauthorized vehicles not connected for electric charging purposes will be towed away at owner’s expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at ( address) or by telephoning (telephone number of local law enforcement agency).” The sign shall be posted in either of the following locations: (A) Immediately adjacent to, and visible from, the stall or space; (B) In a conspicuous place at each entrance to the offstreet parking facility.

(d) Parking Restrictions in Designated Spaces. If a parking stall or space is posted in accordance with subsection ( c) of this section, a person shall not park or leave standing a vehicle in the stall or space unless the vehicle is connected for electric charging purposes. A person shall not obstruct, block, or otherwise bar access to parking stalls or spaces so posted except for the purpose of charging and parking a vehicle that is connected for electric charging purposes . For purposes of this section, a vehicle that has completed charging and thereafter remains connected to the charging station in the parking stall or space is not considered “connected for electric charging purposes.”

(e) Time Limits. The restrictions set forth in subsection ( d) of this section are in addition to the parking time limit restrictions contained in CMC 3251.6, which may be enforced as to parking stalls or spaces designated pursuant to subsection ( b) of this section in accordance with the provisions of CMC 3251.6 irrespective of whether or not a vehicle parked in the stall or space is connected for electric charging purposes or has completed charging when the applicable parking time limit expires.

(f) Parking Citations . Any person who violates subsection ( d) of this section is guilty of an infraction as provided in CMC 3204.

(g) Removal. In addition to and without limitation of any other removal authority the City may have under applicable law, p ursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 22511(c)(1), any peace officer as defined in Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 830) of Title 3 of Part 2 of the California Penal Code, or any regularly

01007.0001/1025225.3

Ordinance No. 25-2501

Page 3 ends

employed and salaried employee who is engaged in the directing of traffic or enforcing parking laws and regulations of the City, after notifying the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, may cause the removal of a v ehicle from a parking stall or space posted in accordance with subsection (c) of this section to the nearest garage, as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 340, that is owned, leased or approved for use by a public agency if the vehicle is not connected for electric charging purposes.”

SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof may be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

SECTION 5. CERTIFICATION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance, and shall cause the same to be published and codified in the manner required by law.

[signatures on the following page]

01007.0001/1025225.3

Ordinance No. 25-2501

Page 4 ends

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by a vote of the City Council at a regular meeting of the City Council on this ___ day of ________, 2025.

_________________________________
Lula Davis-Holmes, Mayor
ATTEST:

__________________________________
Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________________
Sunny K. Soltani, City Attorney

CITY OF CARSON

File #: Version:

Report to Honorable Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, January 21, 2025, 5:00 PM
DISCUSSION 29. To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Antonio Velasco, Revenue Manager FIN Business License Revenue Subject: CONSIDER INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING, BY TITLE ONLY, OF ORDINANCE NO. 25-2502, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDINGSECTION 63134 (MASSAGE PARLORS), SECTION 63134.4 (SAME – EXCEPTION) AND SECTION 63135(MASSAGE TECHNICIANS) OF PART 5 (BUSINESSES, PROFESSIONS, TRADES AND OCCUPATIONSREQUIRING A PERMIT) OF CHAPTER 3 (BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS AND TRADES) OF THE CARSONMUNICIPAL CODE TO EXPRESSLY EXCLUDE BODY SCULPTING FROM DEFINITION OF MASSAGE" (CITYCOUNCIL) I. SUMMARY
The City Council is being requested to approve Ordinance No. 25-2502 amending the City’s existing regulations toexpressly exclude body sculpting from the definition of massage. This will make it clear that body sculptingbusinesses seeking business licenses from the City are not subject to certain State requirements that apply tomassage businesses.

II. RECOMMENDATION
TAKE the following action:

1. WAIVE further reading and introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 25-2502 III. ALTERNATIVES
TAKE another action the City Council deems appropriate, consistent with the requirements of the law.

IV. BACKGROUND
The City’s business licensing regulations set forth in Section 6300 et seq. of the Carson Municipal Code provide certain requirements for different types of businesses. Under the current interpretation of the code, body sculpting could be classified with massage parlors and requiring (massage) technicians to provide a certificate or diploma from a recognized school or institution. The California Massage Therapy Council (“CAMTC”) issues massage technician certification under the requirements of California State Law. However, CAMTC does not recognize body sculpting as a form of massage and thus body sculptors will not be able to meet the requirements under Carson Municipal Code.  The City Council is being asked to approve an ordinance that will expressly exclude body sculpting from massage parlors.

V. FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the adoption of this Ordinance. 701 East Carson Street

VI. EXHIBITS

1. Ordinance No. 25-2502 Body Sculpting

Attachments
Exhibit 1. Ordinance 25-2502 Body Sculpting.pdf
01007.0001/1022440.1
ORDINANCE NO. 25-2502

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 63134 (MASSAGE PARLORS),
SECTION 63134.4 (SAME – EXCEPTION) AND SECTION 63135
(MASSAGE TECHNICIANS) OF PART 5 (BUSINESSES, PROFESSIONS,

TRADES AND OCCUPATIONS REQUIRING A PERMIT) OF CHAPTER
3 ( BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS AND TRADES ) OF THE CARSON

MUNICIPAL CODE TO EXPRESSLY EXCLUDE BODY SCUL PTING

FROM DEFINITION OF MASSAGE

WHEREAS, the existing provisions of the City of Carson Municipal Code do not address licensing requirements for body sculpting establishments and moreover, the existing regulations governing massage establishments could be interpreted as being applicable to body sculpting establishments; and

WHEREAS, massage technicians are required to have valid massage certificates issued by the California Massage Therapy Council which does not issue certific ates to body sculpting establishments; and

WHEREAS, the City Council now sees fit to adopt this Ordinance for the purpose of expressly clarifying that sculpting businesses are not the same as massage establishments and are therefore, not subject to the same State certification regulations.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON, CALIFORNIA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1 . RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. CEQA. This Ordinance has been reviewed by the City Council with respect to applicability of the California Environmental Quality Act ( “CEQA”), the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, §§ 15000 et seq ., hereafter the “CEQA Guidelines”), and any applicable local CEQA policies and procedures and City has determined that this Ordinance is not a “project” for purposes of CEQA, as that term is defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378, because City has determined, in its discretion and based on substantial evidence, that this Ordinance concerns organizational or administrative activities and presents no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

SECTION 3. AMENDMENT. Section 63134 (Massage Parlors), Section 63134.4 (Same – Exception) and Section 63135 (Massage Technicians) of Part 5 (Businesses, Professions, Trades and Occupations Requiring a Permit) of Chapter 3 (Business, Professions, and Trades) of the Carson Municipal Code are hereby amended to read in their entirety as follows:

01007.0001/1022440.1
“63134 Massage Parlors.

Permit Fee $2,500. In addition to the requirements of CMC 6374, an application for a permit for a massage parlor permit also shall show fingerprints and thumbprints of the applicant, unless specifically waived by the Director of Finance. “Massage parlor” means a place where massages, fomentations, electric or magnetic treatment or alcohol rubs are administered or given. For purpose of this Part, “massage” means any method of pressure on, friction against, stroking, kneading, rubbing, tapping, pounding, vibrating, or stimulating the external parts of the human body with the hands or any apparatus with or without such supplementary aids as: liniment; antiseptic; oil; powder; cream; lotion; ointment or other similar preparations. “Massage” shall include, but not be limited to, the following: muscle therapy; facial massage ; shiatsu; Turkish baths; acupressure; reflexology; and related actions or services. Notwithstanding the preceding, “massage parlor” shall not include any health, medical or beauty- related establishment that offers massage services that are both (a) incidental to the primary business; (b) administered solely by means of customer - operated equipment in a private cubicle, room or booth on the business premises; and (c) pursuant to a cosmetology license to perform pedicures and foot massages . “Massage parlor” also shall not include body sculpting establishments. “Body sculpting” refers to non -invasive cosmetic procedures aimed at enhancing body shape and contour through techniques that may include, but are not limited to, cryolipolysis, radiofrequency, and ultrasound therapy and other similar modalities.”

“63134.4 Same- Exception.

CMC 63134 to 63134.3 do not apply to the following:

(a) Any treatment administered in good faith in the course of practice of any healing art personally by any person duly certified by and in good standing with the massage therapy organization as set forth in Business and Professions Code Section 4600 et seq.

(b) Barbers and beauticians who are duly licensed under the laws of the State of California while engaging in practice within the scope of their licenses; provided, however, that this provision shall apply solely to the massaging of the neck, face and scal p and, in connection with manicures and pedicures, the hands and feet.

(c) “Massage businesses” or “establishments” as defined under Section 4612(b)(1) of the California Business and Professions Code, except that such businesses or establishments shall not be exempt from this chapter to the extent Section 4612 permits the regulation of zoning, business licensing, reasonable health and safety requirements of such businesses or establishments by local ordinance.

(d) Body sculpting establishments permitted under California law engaging in noninvasive practice within the scope of their profession.”

01007.0001/1022440.1
“63135 Massage Technicians.

Permit Fee $250.00. As used in this Part “massage technician” means any person, male or female, who administers to another person, for any form of consideration, a massage, alcohol rub, fomentation, bath, electric or magnetic massage procedure, manipulation of the body, or other similar procedure. “Massage technician” does not include body sculpting specialists.”

SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof may be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

SECTION 6. CERTIFICATION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted and codified in the manner required by law.

[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

01007.0001/1022440.1
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on this ___ day of ________, 2025.

_________________________________
Lula Davis-Holmes, Mayor

ATTEST:

__________________________________
Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________________
Sunny K. Soltani, City Attorney

CITY OF CARSON

File #: Version:

Report to Honorable Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, January 21, 2025, 5:00 PM
DISCUSSION 30. To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: John Raymond, CRA Executive Director and Assistant City Manager CD Administration Subject: CONSIDER A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BY AND BETWEEN THE METROPOLITANWATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF LOS ANGELESCOUNTY, WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, THE SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENTBOARD, AND THE CITY OF CARSON TO OUTLINE HOW THE PARTIES WILL COLLABORATE TO PROVIDEWORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT OUTREACH THROUGH EQUITABLE ACCESS TO JOB OPPORTUNITIES ANDCAREER PATHWAYS TO COMMUNITY MEMBERS OF CARSON, INCLUDING K-12 PATHWAY OUTREACH,INFORMATION SESSIONS, AND INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITIES THAT PROVIDE INDUSTRY AWARENESSAND WORK READINESS SKILLS (CITY COUNCIL) I. SUMMARY
The City aims to provide its residents with opportunies for employment and training in trades andprofessions that will allow parcipants to develop skills and work at good paying jobs capable ofsustaining families. The City has partnered with the the South Bay Workforce Investment Board (the“South Bay WIB”) on several prior job training and job placement outreach events. Addionally, theCity provides space at its community center to the South Bay WIB to operate one of its One StopCenters, offering local residents convenient access to valuable career resources.

The City has developed a robust economic development program to spur private investment in thecommunity that will create jobs and has partnered with a number of its public sector partners with apresence in Carson to foster strong partnerships and support the career growth of aspiringprofessionals. In partnership with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, a publicagency organized under the Metropolitan Water District Act of the State of California ( “MWD”),County Sanitaon District No. 2 of Los Angeles County, a county sanitaon district organized andexisng pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Secon 4700 et seq. (the “Sanitaon District”),West Basin Municipal Water District (“WBMWD”), and the South Bay WIB, the City intends to providecommunity members with an opportunity to learn about these industries, develop work readinessskills through internship opportunies, and gain equitable access to apply for various jobopportunies.

This MOU is intended to provide a framework for MWD, the South Bay WIB, and the other pares tothe MOU to coordinate their job training, internship, mentorship, and other services to residents ofthe City of Carson in the area of water treatment, wastewater treatment, and other related trades.

II. RECOMMENDATION
701 East Carson Street

1. APPROVE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BY AND BETWEEN THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,

WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, THE SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD, AND THE

CITY OF CARSON TO OUTLINE HOW THE PARTIES WILL COLLABORATE TO PROVIDE WORKFORCE

DEVELOPMENT OUTREACH THROUGH EQUITABLE ACCESS TO JOB OPPORTUNITIES AND CAREER PATHWAYS TO COMMUNITY MEMBERS OF CARSON, INCLUDING K-12 PATHWAY OUTREACH, INFORMATION

SESSIONS, AND INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITIES THAT PROVIDE INDUSTRY AWARENESS AND WORK READINESS SKILLS.

2. AUTHORIZE the Mayor to execute the document electronically in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

III. ALTERNATIVES
TAKE another action the Council deems appropriate.

IV. BACKGROUND
MWD's Pure Water Southern California project will diversify water supplies and ensure water reliability within the MWD’s jurisdiction.  Starting from the Sanitation District Facility located at 24501 S. Figueroa Street in Carson, MWD will construct a tertiary treatment plant and intends to install and construct a large 84-inch pipe within City streets as follows: north along Main Street, east along Sepulveda Boulevard to Alameda Street, north along Alameda Street to Del Amo Boulevard, and east along Del Amo Boulevard to the eastern boundary of the City.  The Pure Water program is still in the environmental review stages and won’t be operational until at least 2032.

Given the significant presence of the Pure Water project in Carson and its associated impacts to the community during the construction phase, the City began to negotiate an MOU with MWD for the mitigation of construction impacts and other community benefits including local hiring and job training.  In early 2024 the parties pivoted to negotiating an MOU solely focused on job training and hiring, with the construction- related MOU to be completed later in 2025.  While the opening of the Pure Water Program gives the parties plenty of time to develop a program, the City and MWD both wanted to have an effective program in place much sooner than that.

Initially discussions focused on MWD creating a training program for Pure Water and probably other water treatment activities.  One question was if the program were operated solely by MWD to fill its own open entry- level positions, would its size would be limited because the they only has so many openings every year?  The City wanted to ensure there were jobs available for all those completing the program.   One solution was that MWD could increase the size of the job pool by inviting partner agencies to participate.  If that would occur, however, those agencies would also want the residents of their jurisdictions to be able to participate, which would increase the size and scale of the program but then it wouldn’t be a “Carson-only” program.

Another option for a partnership would be adding the County Sanitation District(s) or other similar agencies.

But while water treatment and wastewater treatment are similar they are not the same and are very different in licensing. Certain practical questions were also raised, such as where the training would occur.  (If it’s for Carson residents it should be in or near Carson.)  The City pictured it at the Pure Water demonstration plant at the Sanitation District, but that may not be an adequate or appropriate facility.  We discussed hosting it at one of the local colleges, which is a traditional choice for classroom training, but there may still need to be hands on or field work as part of the course and that may only be at a working water treatment facility.  There were a number of other specific questions about the logistics as well, such as whether the program should be solely evening classes, and whether there would be access to a water treatment facility, especially during the evening.

In the end, the specific training program for the Pure Water project is still under development, and Cal State Dominguez Hills' College of Continuing Education has been part of the discussion and may be responsible for developing the curriculum.  Pure Water is such a cutting edge project that it will require the creation of a new license, so any curriculum would have to be modified and updated from existing programs.

This agreement is a framework for the creation of future, more specific agreements.  Bringing in the Sanitation District and WBMWD has broadened the reach of the program and created more internship and employment opportunities for participants.  Partnering with the South Bay WIB adds additional expertise and resources in the development of internship, mentorship, job training, and recruitment programs.  All of the agencies face similar challenges in terms of reaching new, well-trained applicants and have a desire to improve community outreach (especially to students) and awareness of their industries and the quality of the jobs they offer.  The immediate benefits would be:

MOU Benefits

1. Development of work readiness opportunities in a stable and rewarding governmental service field.

2. Creation of a well-prepared and competitive candidate pool for MWD, the Sanitation District, WBMWD, and the broader water industry.

3. Foster collaboration and knowledge exchange between the City, MWD, the Sanitation District, WBMWD and the South Bay WIB.

The City would assist MWD, the Sanitation District, and WBMWD on marketing of information sessions and internship opportunities and coordinate with MWD, the Sanitation District, WBMWD, and the South Bay WIB on outreach efforts related to the purposes of this MOU.  The agencies would collaborate with each other (MWD, the County Sanitation District, and WBMWD) on the development of K-12 outreach material and outreach to K- 12 classrooms regarding career pathways and host interns at their respective facilities (Grace F. Napolitano Pure Water Southern California Innovation Center for MWD, A.K. Warren Water Resource Facility for the County Sanitation District, and an appropriate WBMWD facility) to gain industry knowledge and work readiness skills.

The South Bay WIB will collaborate with MWD, County Sanitation District, and WBMWD on internship opportunities, including pre-apprenticeship and apprenticeship programs that best fits each partner.  In addition, they will advertise, recruit, and case manage the internship program, up to and including providing full funding of the internship program hosting interns at MWD, County Sanitation District, and WBMWD pursuant to this MOU and contingent upon availability of funds.

Mutual responsibilities
Mutual Responsibilities include that the parties will develop an agreement that includes internship program guidelines, processes, and criteria through collaboration between all Parties, promote the workforce development outreach efforts through the means available to each of the parties, and regularly assess and adapt, as necessary, outreach efforts and the internship program based on feedback from interns, mentors, supervisors, and partners.

To summarize, this is the first MOU of several.  Later agreements will be more specific to the creation of training programs and may include Cal State Dominguez Hills, and there will be more specific two-party or multi-party agreements related to the internship and recruitment programs.

V. FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City at this point.

VI. EXHIBITS

1. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

Attachments
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is made as of ______________, 2024 (“Effective Date”), by and between The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, a public agency organized under The Metropolitan Water District Act of the State of California ( “MWD” or the “District”), County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County, a county sanitation district organized and existing pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq. ( the “Sanitation District”), West Basin Municipal Water District (“WBMWD”), the South Bay Workforce Investment Board (the “South Bay WIB”), and the City of Carson (“Carson” or the “City”), (each individually, a “Party” and all together, the “Parties”).

The intent of this MOU is to outline how the Parties will collaborate to provide workforce development outreach through equitable access to job opportunities and career pathways to community members of Carson, including K-12 career pathway education outreach, information sessions, and internship program opportunities that provide industry awareness and work readiness skills.

R E C I T A L S
WHEREAS, MWD is a public agency organized and existing under The Metropolitan Water District Act of the State of California, California Statutes 1927, Chapter 429, as reenacted in 1969 as Chapter 209, as amended (“Act”), and is authorized by the Act to develop, transport, store, and distribute water to its Member Agencies which are located throughout the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, and Ventura.

WHEREAS, the City has discussed with MWD, the Sanitation District, WBMWD, and the South Bay WIB its desire to develop, promote , or sponsor industry awareness and work readiness skills for Carson residents.

WHEREAS, MWD, the Sanitation District, and WBMWD, are committed to providing K-12 career pathway education outreach to elementary schools and high schools in the City.

WHEREAS, MWD, the Sanitation District, and WBMWD, are committed to providing information sessions for community organizations and/or community members , focusing on application and recruitment processes, career pathways, and job opportunities.

WHEREAS, MWD, WBMWD, and the Sanitation District, in collaboration with the South Bay WIB, will host interns at their respective facilities to provide work readiness skills.

WHEREAS, South Bay WIB currently has available resources to fund the interns placed at MWD, WBMWD, and the Sanitation District’s facilities.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

I. Objective
The City aims to provide its residents with opportunities for employment and training in trades and professions that will allow participants to develop skills and work at good paying jobs capable of sustaining families. The City has partnered with the South Bay WIB on several prior job training and job placement outreach events. Additionally, the City provides space at its community center to the S outh Bay WIB to operate one of its One Stop Centers , offering local residents convenient access to valuable career resources.

The City has developed a robust economic development program to spur private investment in the community that will create jobs and has partnered with a number of its public sector partners with a presence in Carson to foster strong partnerships and support the career growth of aspiring professionals.

In partnership with MWD, the Sanitation District, WBMWD, and the South Bay WIB, the City intends to provide community members with an opportunity to learn about these industries, develop work readiness skills through internship opportunities, and gain equitable access to apply for various job opportunities.

II. MOU Benefits

1. Development of work readiness opportunities in a stable and rewarding governmental service field.

2. Creation of a well -prepared and competitive candidate pool for MWD, the Sanitation District , WBMWD, and the broader water industry.

3. Foster collaboration and knowledge exchange between the City, MWD, the Sanitation District, WBMWD and the South Bay WIB.

III. City Responsibilities

1. Assist MWD, the Sanitation District, and WBMWD on marketing of information sessions and internship opportunities.

2. Coordinate with MWD, the Sanitation District, WBMWD , and the South Bay WIB on outreach efforts related to the purposes of this MOU.

IV. MWD Responsibilities

1. Collaborate with the LA County Sanitation District and WBMWD on the development of K-12 outreach material and outreach to K-12 classrooms regarding career pathways.

2. Host interns at the Grace F. Napolitano Pure Water Southern California Innovation Center to gain industry knowledge and work readiness skills.

V. County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County Responsibilities

1. Collaborate with the MWD and WBMWD on the development of K-12 outreach material and outreach to K-12 classrooms regarding career pathways.

2. Host interns at the A.K. Warren Water Resource Facility to gain industry knowledge and work readiness skills.

VI. WBMWD responsibilities

1. Collaborate with MWD and the LA County Sanitation District on the development of K-12 outreach material and outreach to classrooms regarding career pathways.

2. Host interns at an appropriate WBMWD facility to gain industry knowledge and work readiness skills.

VII. South Bay Workforce Investment Board responsibilities

1. Collaborate with MWD, LA County Sanitation District , and WBMWD on internship opportunities, including pre-apprenticeship and apprenticeship programs that best fits each partner.

2. Advertise, recruit, and case manage the internship program.

3. Provide full funding of the internship program hosting interns at MWD, LA County Sanitation District, and WBMWD pursuant to this MOU and contingent upon availability of funds.

VIII. Mutual Responsibilities

1. Develop an agreement that includes internship program guidelines, processes, and criteria through collaboration between all Parties.

2. Promote the workforce development outreach efforts through the means available to each of the Parties.

3. Regularly assess and adapt, as necessary, outreach efforts and the internship p rogram based on feedback from interns, mentors, supervisors, and partners.

IX. General Provisions
a. Term and Termination

1. This MOU shall be effective for three (3) years following the date of execution by the last Party to approve this MOU (“Effective Date”), unless terminated sooner pursuant to Article IX.a.2 below. This MOU may be renewed in yearly intervals upon mutual agreement of all Parties.

2. This MOU may be terminated by any Party with or without cause by providing written notice to the other Parties at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective termination date.

3. This MOU constitutes the entire agreement related to the subject matter hereof among the Parties.

There are no additional expressed or implied agreements written or oral relating to the subject matter hereof among the Parties except as expressly stated in this MOU.

4. This MOU is a non-binding agreement that all Parties have entered into in good faith. Any of the Parties may disassociate from the effort without penalty or liability by notifying the others in writing. b. Nondiscrimination
In compliance with federal law, including provisions of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Sections 503 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Parties will not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation or gender identity in their administration of policies, the workforce development outreach efforts, or activities; admission policies; internship program, other programs, or employment.
c. Use of Name
The Parties agree not to use each other’s names in any advertising or other form of publicity without the prior written consent of that Party, except to the extent that any Party may use the name of the other Parties in announcing this MOU through a press release and during the recruitment process. This provision survives the termination of this MOU.
d. Amendments
This MOU may be amended at any time by mutual written agreement of the Parties without additional consideration.
e. Entire MOU
This MOU is the entire MOU between the Parties. No other MOUs, oral or written, have been entered into with respect to the subject matter of this MOU.
f. Governing Law
The validity, interpretation, and performance of this MOU shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
g. Successors and Assignment
The Parties will not assign or transfer its interest in this MOU or any responsibilities to be performed without amending this MOU.
h. Notices
The below persons are the principal points of contact of the Parties with respect to this MOU. Unless otherwise agreed to, all information sharing among the Parties described in this MOU will flow between these points of contact. The Parties agree to notify all the Parties of any changes to their points of contact as soon as practicable.

Brenda Martinez, DEI Workforce Development, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Raymond Tremblay, Departmental Engineer, Facilities Planning, Los Angeles County Sanitation District E.J. Caldwell, General Manager, West Basin Municipal Water District Jan Vogel, Executive Director, South Bay Workforce Investment Board John S. Raymond, Assistant City Manager, City of Carson

All legal notices or other communication provided for in this MOU shall be given to the Parties addressed as follows:

TO MWD:

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, 700 N. Alameda St., Los Angeles, CA 90012

TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY:

Los Angeles County Sanitation District, 1955 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, CA, CA 90601 TO WBMWD:

West Basin Municipal Water District, 17140 S. Avalon Blvd. Carson, CA 90746 TO SOUTH BAY WIB:

South Bay Workforce Investment Board, 1220 Engracia Ave. Torrance, CA 90501 TO CITY:

City of Carson 701 E. Carson Street Carson, CA 90745 Carson, CA 90747 Attn: City Manager’s Office i. Authority
Each Party represents and warrants that the person(s) signing below on its behalf has the authority to enter into this MOU and that this MOU does not violate any of its existing MOU or obligations.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this MOU to be executed by their duly authorized officers, effective as of the Effective Date.

THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
BY
Name:

Title:

Dated:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By __________________________________
Senior Deputy General Counsel

COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
By: __________________________________
Chairperson, Board of Directors

ATTEST:

By______________________________________
Secretary to the Board
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Lewis Brisbois & Bisgaard & Smith, LLP

By __________________________________
District Counsel

WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT

BY BY
Name: Name:

Title: Title:

Dated: Dated:

SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD

BY BY
Name: Name:

Title: Title:

Dated: Dated:

CITY OF CARSON, CALIFORNIA

BY BY
Name: Name:

Title: Title:

Dated: Dated:

ATTEST:

Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sunny K. Soltani, City Attorney
[rjl]

CITY OF CARSON

File #: Version:

Report to Honorable Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, January 21, 2025, 5:00 PM
DISCUSSION 31. To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Michael George, Assistant to the City Manager  Subject: CONSIDER ADOPTING URGENCY ORDINANCE 25-2503U AND CONSIDER APPROVINGRESOLUTION 25-011 TO SUPPORT THE RELIEF AND RECOVERY EFFORT IN RESPONSE TO THE JANUARY2025 FIRES IN THE LOS ANGELES AREA (CITY COUNCIL) I. SUMMARY
This item is on the agenda at the request of Mayor Davis-Holmes and requests the City Council to adopt UrgencyOrdinance 25-2503U and to approve Resolution 25-011 to help provide relief to the victims of the January 2025fires in the Los Angeles area. Adoption of the proposed urgency ordinance will provide a 90-day suspension of the City of Carson short-termrental prohibition by immediately suspending Municipal Code Section 93162.3. This will allow for greater flexibilityin rental regulations, providing displaced individuals and families with access to housing accommodations in theCity of Carson during this time of emergency. At the end of the 90 days, this suspension shall sunset, unlessextended by the City Council.  Approval of Resolution 25-011 allows the City Council to formally express its solidarity and support to the leadersof the City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County for their relief efforts in response to the tragic January 2025fires. The City of Carson has launched “Operation Carson Cares” to support the relief efforts and encourages localcommunity engagement in what will be a long recovery effort. The City also recognizes the importance of regionalsolidarity and collaboration in times of crisis, and stands committed to continue supporting recovery efforts in theCity of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County. Additionally, The City of Carson encourages local residents, businesses, religious organizations, and communityorganizations to continue supporting the recovery efforts through donations, volunteering, and staying informedabout opportunities to assist in rebuilding efforts, particularly for the most disadvantaged and marginalizedcommunities impacted by the fires.

II. RECOMMENDATION

1. ADOPT, by a two-thirds affirmative vote of the City Council, Ordinance 25-2503U, "AN URGENCY ORDINANCE

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SUSPENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 93162.3 FOR THE DURATION OF THIS ORDINANCE"

2. APPROVE Resolution 25-011
III. ALTERNATIVES
TAKE another action deemed appropriate by the City Council and that is consistent with applicable laws. 701 East Carson Street
IV. BACKGROUND
See Urgency Ordinance 25-2503U and Resolution 25-011, attached as Exhibits 1 and 2.

V. FISCAL IMPACT
None, as this item pertains only to the adoption of the proposed Resolution and Urgency Ordinance.

VI. EXHIBITS

1. Urgency Ordinance 25-2503U2. Resolution 25-011

Attachments
Urgency Ordinance 25-2503U
Resolution 25-011

01007.0002/1045077.1
URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 25-2503U

AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF CARSON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
SUSPENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 93162.3 FOR

THE DURATION OF THIS ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, certain areas within the City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County, particularly the communities of Altadena and the Pacific Palisades, have recently experienced catastrophic devastation due to the January 2025 Santa Ana Windstorm and Critical Fire Events , which included sustained winds and dangerous gusts of over eighty (80) miles per hour , wind- driven and destructive fires , and which led to multiple disaster declarations and states of emergency in several jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, these unprecedented winds and fires have caused loss of life, collectively burned over 39,000 acres, destroyed or damaged more than 12,000 structures including homes and businesses, displaced thousands of families, destroyed infrastructure, and caused power outages, downed trees, road closures, rockslides, and significant debris; and WHEREAS, the winds and fires have caused immense damage to natural resources, forcing many individuals and families to evacuate, and leaving others in need of immediate assistance and long-term recovery; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code § 36937, subdivision (b), any ordinance for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, containing a declaration of the facts constituting the urgency, that is passed by a four -fifths vote of the City Council, shall take effect immediately upon its adoption; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to City of Carson’s Charter Sections 313(F) and 316(4) , “a ny ordinance declared by the City Council as an urgency measure necessary for the immediate preservation of public peace, health or safety, and containing a statement of the reasons for its urgency, may be introduced and adopted at one and the same meeting if passed by a two -thirds affirmative vote of the City Council;” and
WHEREAS, due to the urgent need to provide housing accommodations for displaced residents, it is necessary to temporarily suspend the enforcement of Municipal Code Section 93162.3 in residential and mixed-use zones, to enable rental opportunities for those affected by the fires; and
WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the City Council seeks and intends to protect the health, safety, and welfare of residents by suspending enforcement of short-term rental restrictions to assist residents impacted by the emergency situation presented by the fires and the potential displacement of individuals and families.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

01007.0002/1045077.1
SECTION 1 . RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are true and corr ect, and are incorporated herein by this reference as findings of fact.

SECTION 2. URGENCY FINDINGS. The City Council of the City of Carson hereby finds, determines, and declares that:

A. The City of Carson is experiencing an urgent need to temporarily suspend the enforcement of Municipal Code Section 93612.3 regarding short-term rentals in residential and mixed-use zones due to the imminent fires, which has caused the displacement of many residents in the State of California.

B. The immediate suspension of Municipal Code Section 93162.3 will allow for greater flexibility in rental regulations, providing displaced individuals and families with housing accommodations during this time of emergency.

C. For the duration of this Ordinance, Municipal Code Section 931 62.3 shall be suspended and shall not be enforced with respect to residential or mixed -use zones. During this period, short-term rentals may be permitted in these zones in accordance with any regulations promulgated by the City Manager.

D. The City Manager shall have the authority to promulgate temporary regulations concerning short-term rentals in residential and mixed -use zones during the period in which this Ordinance is in effect. These regulations shall be designed to address the issues prompting the suspension of Municipal Code Section 93162.3 and may include, but are not limited to, guidelines regarding rental during the period in which this Ordinance is in effect , enforcement mechanisms, temporary accommodations, and references to any requirements such as the need to obtain permits.

E. This Ordinance shall sunset and be of no force and effect after ninety (90) days from its adoption, unless extended by the City Council.

SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. Pursuant t o the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines § 15378, the City Council finds that this Urgency Ordinance is not a “project” because its adoption is not an activity that has the potential for a direct physical change or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment.

Accordingly, this Urgency Ordinance is not subject to CEQA.

SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sent ences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof may be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately, pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City Council by Charter Sections 313(F) and 316(4), upon its adoption by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the City Council.

01007.0002/1045077.1

SECTION 6. CERTIFICATION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted and codified in the manner required by law.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by a two-thirds affirmative vote of the City Council at a regular meeting of the City Council on this 21st day of January 2025.

CITY OF CARSON

_________________________________
Lula Davis-Holmes, Mayor
ATTEST:

__________________________________
Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________________
Sunny K. Soltani, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss

CITY OF CARSON )

I, Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk of the City of Carson, California, do hereby attest to and certify that the foregoing Ordinance, being Ordinance 25-2503U was adopted by the Carson City Council at its meeting held on the 21st day of January, 2025, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

By: _________________________________
Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk

RESOLUTION NO. 25-011

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON,

CALIFORNIA, EXPRESSING SOLIDARITY AND SUPPORT TO THE

LEADERS OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES AND LOS ANGELES

COUNTY FOR THEIR RECOVERY EFFORTS FOLLOWING THE
JANUARY 2025 CATASTROPHIC AND DEVASTATING FIRES IN THE

LOS ANGELES AREA
WHEREAS, the City of Carson stands in proud solidarity with its neighboring cities and communities during times of emergency, crisis, and recovery; and WHEREAS, certain areas within the City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County, most especially the communities of Altadena and the Pacific Palisades, have recently experienced catastrophic devastation due to the January 2025 Windstorm and Critical Fire Events, which included sustained winds and dangerous gusts of over 80 mph, wind-driven and destructive fires, and which led to multiple disaster declarations and states of emergency in several jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, these unprecedented winds and fires have tragically caused loss of life, collectively burned over 39,000 acres, destroyed or damaged more than 12,000 structures including homes and businesses, displaced thousands of families including marginalized communities of color, destroyed infrastructure, and caused power outages, downed trees, road closures, rockslides, and significant debris; and
WHEREAS, the winds and fires have caused immense damage to natural resources, forcing many individuals and families to evacuate, and leaving others in need of immediate assistance and long-term recovery; and
WHEREAS, the City of Carson commends and stands in support and solidarity with the leaders of the City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County during this extremely challenging crisis, including Mayor Karen Bass, Los Angeles County Supervisors Kathryn Barger and Lindsey Horvath, Los Angeles County Sheriff Department Chief Robert Luna, Los Angeles County Fire Department Chief Anthony Marrone, City of Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell, and City of Los Angeles Fire Department Chief Kristen Crowley, who have shown leadership and coordination in response to the crisis, mobilizing resources, providing emergency assistance, and ensuring the needs of impacted communities are met during this challenging time; and WHEREAS, the City of Carson has launched “Operation Carson Cares” to support the relief efforts and encourages local community engagement in what will be a long recovery effort, recognizes the importance of regional solidarity and collaboration in times of crisis, and stands committed to continue supporting recovery efforts in the City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City of Carson expresses its full support and solidarity with the leaders of the City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County in their recovery efforts following the recent catastrophic fires.

SECTION 2. The City of Carson recognizes the dedication and tireless work of the local officials, first responders, emergency personnel, and volunteers in providing recovery and relief to the residents and businesses impacted by the fires.

SECTION 3. The City of Carson reaffirms its commitment to regional collaboration and cooperation to support recovery efforts and ensure the community emerges stronger and more resilient.

SECTION 4. The City of Carson encourages local residents, businesses, religious organizations, and community organizations to continue supporting the recovery efforts through donations, volunteering, and staying informed about opportunities to assist in rebuilding efforts, particularly for the most disadvantaged and marginalized communities impacted by the fires.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of January 2025.

_________________________________
Lula Davis-Holmes, Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________________
Sunny K. Soltani, City Attorney

ATTEST:

________________________________________
Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:

CITY OF CARSON )

I, Khaleah Bradshaw , City Clerk of the City of Carson, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 25-011, was passed and approved by the City Council of the City of Carson at its meeting held on January 21, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

________________________________________
Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk

CITY OF CARSON

File #: Version:

Report to Honorable Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, January 21, 2025, 5:00 PM
DISCUSSION 32. To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk CCO Option 1 Subject: CONSIDERATION OF ONLY LOCAL UNCONTESTED APPOINTMENTS TO THE CITY’SCOMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, AND BOARDS, AND CITY AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS BY MAYOR ANDCITY COUNCIL AND CONSIDER ALL (CONTESTED AND UNCONTESTED) APPOINTMENTS TO ALLCOMMISSIONS (CITY COUNCIL) I. SUMMARY
This item is on the agenda to consider only uncontested appointments of City Commission, Committee, andBoard members in accordance with the City Charter, Article VI, by Mayor and City Council. (Exhibit 1) Also, consider all (contested and uncontested) appointments to all commissions and also considerappointments to City Affiliated Organizations. Pursuant to Section 602 of the City Charter provides, in part, the mayor and each member of the city councilmay appoint one member to a position on each City board or City commission, and the remainingmembership positions shall be appointed by the mayor and approved by a majority of the city council,including the three alternates. At the January 7, 2025, City Council meeting, Mayor Davis-Holmes continued this item to a future meeting.

II. RECOMMENDATION
TAKE the following actions:

1. CONSIDER and only APPOINT uncontested members to the City Commissions, Committees, and Boards;

2. CONSIDER and APPOINT all (contested and uncontested) members to all commissions except Planning Commission and Environmental Commission;

3. CONSIDER and APPOINT members to City Affiliated Organizations;

4. DIRECT the City Clerk to notify all affected appointments of this action in writing;

5. IF APPLICABLE, DIRECT the City Clerk to post and publish in accordance with the Maddy Act III. ALTERNATIVES
N/A
701 East Carson Street
IV. BACKGROUND
Every two years after the municipal election, most Commission and Board appointments expire. As unscheduled vacancies occur and/or members are frequently absent, it is best practice to consider new appointments.

Invitations to submit an appointment application for all interested person(s) were posted in accordance with the Maddy Act. Applications for individuals requesting appointments were previously provided under separate cover to the Mayor and City Council.

V. FISCAL IMPACT
Funds for member stipends are already budgeted for Fiscal Year 2024-2025.

VI. EXHIBITS
Local Appointments List  Prepared by: Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk and Tomisha Haywood, Records Management Coordinator

Attachments
Exhibit 1 - January 21, 2025, Agenda Report.pdf
*
** M
a
Mayor's uncontested
Denotes vacated seat
I. COMMISSIONS
[1] Economic Development Commission
Established by: Ordinance No. 00-1191. §1 (CMC §27104.1); Ordinance No. 21-2108 Membership:

Qualification:

Meetings:

Staff Liaison:

Support Staff:

Appointed Term Expires
Aldridge Jr., Ray (LDH)** 12-06-22 11-30-26
Childers, Christopher (CH) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Embry, Darren (LDH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Kelley, Blake (LDH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Jimenez, Trini (AR) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Pandolfo, Katie (JH) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Sparrow, Clyde (LDH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Wallace, Deborah (LDH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Watar, Nasser (JD) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Cordova, Ted (LDH) Alt. 1 04-04-23 11-30-26
Ibarra, Victor (LDH) Alt. 2 02-06-24 11-30-26
O'Leary, Danielle (LDH) Alt. 3 02-06-24 11-30-26

CITY OF CARSON

LOCAL APPOINTMENTS LIST FOR

COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, AND BOARDS
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54970 et seq.)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the current terms for the following Commissioners, Committee and Board Members will expire as indicated for the respective bodies listed. Any interested resident of the City of Carson, California is eligible to serve on any of the below-named commissions, committees, or boards unless otherwise specified. Applications are available at the City Clerk's Office by request at (310) 952-1720.

The following appointed positions may receive compensation John Raymond, Asst. City Mgr x1773; Saied Naaseh, Dir. of Comm. Dev. x1770 Article VI, §602 of the City Charter: To be qualified for appointment, the member shall be a qualified elector of the City, shall be domiciled in the City for at least sixty (60) days immediately preceding their appointment, and shall continue to reside in the City for the duration of his or her tenure, unless otherwise provided by ordinance.

The mayor and each member of the city council may appoint one member to a position on each City board, committee or commission, and the remaining membership positions shall be appointed by the mayor and approved by a majority of the city council, including the three alternates.
9 members; 3 alternates
Shall be and remain a resident of, or have a place of employment or business in the City of Carson, and be at least 18 years of age. Shall include representatives of all major sectors of the Carson business community as determined in the sole discretion of the City Council.

Sandy Solis, Economic Development Commission Secretary x1325 1st Thursday, 8:00 a.m., Executive Conference Room
Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 1
[2] Environmental Commission*
Established by: Ordinance No. 70-128; §1 (CMC §2750); Ordinance No. 21-2103 Membership:

Qualification:

Meetings:

Staff Liaison:

Support Staff:

Appointed Term Expires
Vacant (JH) 11-30-26
Swayzer, Ezekiel (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Hopson, Lillian (LDH)** 12-03-24 11-30-26
Tresvant, Christina (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Koons, William (JD) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Peralta, Maribel (AR) 01-07-25 11-30-26
Edwards, Lashon (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Taylor, Hourie (CH) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Watkins, Freeman (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 1 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 2 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 3 11-30-26
[3] Human Relations Commission*
Established by:

Membership: 9 members (7 general, 2 youth); 3 alternates Qualification:

Meetings: 3rd Wednesday, 6:30 p.m., City Manager Conference Room Staff Liaison: Robert Lennox, Asst. City Manager x1728
Support Staff: Cac Le, Council Aide x1722
Appointed Term Expires
Junio, Teresita (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Calhoun, Jill (AR) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Davenport, Kimberley (JH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Keely, Tina (JD) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Ramos, Jessica (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Reed, Cassandra (CH) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Russ, Harriett (LDH)** 12-03-24 11-30-26
Ifeacho, Dr. Chinyere (LDH) Alt. 1 12-03-24 11-30-26
Viernes, Irene (LDH) Alt. 2 12-03-24 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 3 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Youth 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Youth 11-30-26
Shall be and remain a resident of the City of Carson and be at least eighteen (18) years of age at the time of the member's appointment
Shall be a resident of the City of Carson. Youth members shall be 16-21 years of age, enrolled in school at time of appointment, maintain a 2.0 GPA, shall have interest in human relations.

Ordinance No. 74-294; Ordinance No. 87-812, §1; Ordinance No. 89-883,§1 1st Wednesday, 6:30 p.m. (Executive Conference Room)
Jessica Coria, Division Secretary x1823
9 members; 3 alternates
Reata Kulcsar, Innovation & Sustainability Manager x1312 Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 2
[4] Parks, Recreation and Cultural Arts Commission*
Established by: Ordinance No. 69-65 (CMC §2735); Ordinance No. 21-2106 Membership: 9 members; 3 alternates
Qualification:

Meetings: Last Thursday, 6:30 p.m. (Executive Conference Room) Staff Liaison: Michael Whittiker Jr., Director of Community Services x3571 Support Staff: Kimberly Madrigal, Administrative Secretary x3581 Appointed Term Expires
Cainglet, Jesus-Alex (CH) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Cortado, Kimberly (JH) 06-20-23 11-30-26
Dahilig Jr., Cesar (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Lawrence, Shannon (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Gonzalez, Walter (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Hilliard, Kisa (JD) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Hunter, Edwina (AR) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Langston, DeAnthony (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Ramos, Oscar (LDH)** 12-03-24 11-30-26
Brown Sr., Kelvin (LDH) Alt. 1 12-03-24 11-30-26
Johnson, Jo Jacqueline (LDH) Alt. 2 12-03-24 11-30-26
Brillantes, Rudolfo (LDH) Alt. 3 12-03-24 11-30-26
[5] Planning Commission*
Established by: Ordinance No. 13, §1 (CMC §2700); § 606 of the City Charter Membership: 9 members; 3 alternates
Qualification:

Monthly Meeting: 2nd and 4th Tuesday, 6:30 p.m. (City Council Chambers) Staff Liaison: Christopher Palmer, Planning Mgr. x1365; McKina Alexander, Sr. Planner x1326 Support Staff: Laura Gonzalez, Planning Secretary x1328 Appointed Term Expires
Diaz, Louie (JD) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Docdocil, Frederick (LDH)** 12-03-24 11-30-26
Guerra, Carlos (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Vacant (AR) 11-30-26
Huff, Del (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Wilson, Leticia (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Mfume, DeQuita (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Johnson, Clarence (JH) 03-19-24 11-30-26
Thomas, Dianne (CH) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Montecarlo, Jaime (LDH) Alt. 1 12-03-24 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 2 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 3 11-30-26
Resident of the City of Carson
Resident of the City of Carson
Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 3
[6] Public Relations Commission*
Established by: Ordinance No. 01-1239, §2 (CMC §27105.1) Membership: 9 members; 3 alternates
Qualification:

Meetings: 4th Tuesday, 12:00 p.m. (City Manager Conference Room) Staff Liaison: Margie Revilla-Garcia, Public Information Manager x1741 Support Staff: Christine Foisia, Senior Clerk x1740
Appointed Term Expires
Eatman, Sonya (LDH) Community Representative 12-03-24 11-30-26 Gomez, Freddie (LDH)** Community Representative 12-03-24 11-30-26 Stewart, Linda (LDH) Community Representative 12-03-24 11-30-26 Sandoz, Jeretta (AR) Community Representative 12-03-24 11-30-26 Ross, Dorothy (JD) Public Relations Specialist 12-03-24 11-30-26 Nunley, Madalyn (LDH) Public Relations Specialist 12-03-24 11-30-26 Pitcher, Pamela (LDH) Public Relations Specialist 12-03-24 11-30-26 Smith, Byron (CH) Public Relations Specialist 03-06-24 11-30-26 Price, Dr. Denice (JH) Public Relations Specialist 04-04-23 11-30-26 Guillory, Rachelle (LDH) Alt. 1 12-03-24 11-30-26
Waddis, Dorcas (LDH) Alt. 2 12-03-24 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 3 11-30-26
[7] Public Safety Commission*
Established by: Ordinance No. 99-1160 § 1; Ordinance No. 01-1239 § 1 (CMC §27103.6); Ordinance No. 21-2104
Membership: 9 members; 3 alternates
Qualification:

Meetings: 3rd Thursday, 6:30 p.m. (Executive Conference Room) Staff Liaison: Priscilla Palma, Division Secretary x1787 Support Staff: Vacant
Appointed Term Expires
Allen, Jeffrey (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Arnold, Keith (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Flinton, Lawrence (AR) 08-06-24 11-30-26
Dacus, Samuel (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Dorsey, Donnie (CH) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Lewis, Prentiss (JH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Rivers, Angela (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Romero, Heidi (LDH)** 12-03-24 11-30-26
Cogut, Louis (JD) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Wilson, Michael (LDH) Alt. 1 12-03-24 11-30-26
Brown, Randy (LDH) Alt. 2 12-03-24 11-30-26
Childs, Aisha (LDH) Alt. 3 12-03-24 11-30-26
Shall be a resident of the City of Carson and be at least eighteen (18) years of age at the time of the member’s appointment.

Shall reside or be employed in the City of Carson and be at least eighteen (18) years of age at the time of the member’s appointment.

Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 4
[8] Public Works Commission*
Established by: Ordinance No. 99-1181 § 2 (CMC § 2798.6) Membership: 9 members; 3 alternates
Qualification:

Meetings: 2nd Monday, 6:30 p.m. (Executive Conference Room) Staff Liaison: Gilbert Marquez, Principle City/Civil Engineer x1813 Support Staff: Taelour C. James, Division Secretary x1801 Appointed Term Expires
Baddeley, Kevin (AR) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Calhoun, James (JD) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Fe'esago, Uli (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
McNichols, Ryan (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Howard, Kobii (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Benson, Melvin (CH) 07-18-23 11-30-26
Nweke, Chike (LDH)** 12-03-24 11-30-26
Martin, Jr., Marion (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Todd Griffin, Kellie (JH) 01-07-25 11-30-26
Obiora, Emmanuel (LDH) Alt. 1 12-03-24 11-30-26
Cottrell, John (LDH) Alt. 2 12-03-24 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 3 11-30-26
[9] Senior Citizens Advisory Commission*
Established by: Ordinance No. 97-1119, § 1 (CMC § 2799.6) Membership: 11 members; 3 alternates
Qualification:

Meetings: 2nd Monday, 4:00 p.m. (Community Center, Carson/Dominguez room) Staff Liaison: Mike Whittiker Jr., Dir. of Comm. Srvs. x1780; Dani Cook, Human Srvs. Supv. X04/04/2380 Support Staff:

Appointed Term Expires
Graves, Shirley (LDH)** 12-03-24 11-30-26
Lopez, Delia (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Cole, Daniel (AR) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Dunn, Linda (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Bates, Billye (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Patterson, Patricia (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Ronquillo, Myrna (JD) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Ruiz-Raber, Julie (CH) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Seymore, Dr. Vergie (JH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Simpson-Lott, Darlene (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Walker, Itelia (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Brown, LaRhonda (LDH) Alt. 1 12-03-24 11-30-26
Leverette, Ernestine (LDH) Alt. 2 12-03-24 11-30-26
Davis, Pauline (LDH) Alt. 3 12-03-24 11-30-26
Brenda Reed, Senior Clerk x1775;
Have interest, experience or ability in construction, transportation, traffic, or circulation areas to ensure that traffic, vehicle parking, bikeways, and transportation systems and other City facilities are regulated and constructed in a manner calculated to best provide for the safety and welfare of the public. Shall be and remain a resident of, or have a place of employment or business in, the City of Carson, and be at least eighteen (18) years of age at the time of the member’s appointment.

Resident of the City of Carson and be at least 50 years of age at the time of appointment.

Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 5
[10] Veterans Affairs Commission*
Established by: Ordinance No. 99-1154, § 1 (CMC § 27102.6) Membership: 11 members; 3 alternates
Qualification:

Meetings: 3rd Monday, 6:00 p.m. (Veterans SportsComplex - Activity Room) Staff Liaison: Kisheen Tulloss, Council Aide x1711
Support Staff: Mikala Multiauaopele, Division Secretary x3557 Appointed Term Expires
Batucal, Arthur (JH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Boyd, Robert (JD) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Branch, Jr., Roger (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Da Silva, Manuel (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Raber, Brian (CH) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Salomon, Emmanuel (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Mosequera, Nemie P. (LDH)** 12-03-24 11-30-26
Woods, Richard (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Woods, Thomas (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Seay, Al (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Wilvert, Karl (AR) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 1 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 2 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 3 11-30-26
Shall be a resident of the City of Carson and be at least eighteen (18) years of age at the time of the member’s appointment.

Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 6
[11] Women's Issues Commission*
Established by: Ordinance No. 02-1246, § 1 (CMC § 27106.6) Membership: 9 members; 3 alternates
Qualification:

Meetings: 4th Monday, 6:00 p.m. (City Manager Conference Room) Staff Liaison: Ravynne Staine, Council Aide x1733
Support Staff: Vacant
Appointed Term Expires
Dela Cruz-Manio, Connie (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Fielder, Yolanda (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Fields-Robinson, Dr. Leandrea (LDH)** 12-03-24 11-30-26 Foster, Carolyn (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Koons, Fe (JD) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Odom Houze, Susan (JH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Price, Dr. Greta (AR) 12-06-22 11-30-26
Williams, Maria (CH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Tresvant, Sheila (LDH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Graves, Keichun (LDH) Alt. 1 12-03-24 11-30-26
Mackson, Monique (LDH) Alt. 2 12-03-24 11-30-26
Johnson, Veronica (LDH) Alt. 3 12-03-24 11-30-26
[12] Youth Commission*
Established by: Ordinance No. 98-1132, § 1 (CMC § 27100.6 ) Membership: 11 members; 3 alternates
Qualification:

Meetings: 2nd Wednesday, 7:00 p.m. (Executive Conference Room) Staff Liaison: Brian Legaspi, Council Aide x1721
Support Staff: Vacant
Appointed Term Expires
Mitchell, Hannah (LDH) 06-06-24 06-30-25
Moore, Joshua (JH) 06-06-24 06-30-25
Redway, Khristopher (LDH) 06-06-24 06-30-25
Estrada, Juan (LDH) 06-06-24 06-30-25
Villasana, Andrea (JD) 12-03-24 06-30-25
Mitchell, Jazcidi (LDH) 12-03-24 06-30-25
Colson, Lewis (LDH)** 06-06-24 06-30-25
Smith, Zoey (CH) 06-06-24 06-30-25
Williams, Liv (LDH) 06-06-24 06-30-25
Homna, Kayla (AR) 01-07-25 06-30-25
Macias, Lea (LDH) 01-07-25 06-30-25
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 1 06-30-25
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 2 06-30-25
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 3 06-30-25
Resident of the City of Carson and be at least 13, but not more than 18 years of age at the time of appointment.

Shall be a resident of the City of Carson or work in the City of Carson during their tenure on the Commission and shall be at least eighteen (18) years of age at the time of the member’s appointment.

Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 7
II. BOARDS & COMMITTEES
[13] Measure C and Measure K Budget Oversight Committee Established by:

Membership: 5 members; 2 alternates
Qualification: Resident of the City of Carson.

Meetings: 2nd Tuesday, 6:30p.m. (Community Center)
Staff Liaison: William Jefferson, Director of Finance x1756 Support Staff: Vicki Hernandez, Senior Clerk x1744
Appointed Term Expires
Dorsey-Reeves, Vera (CH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Vacant (AR) 11-30-26
Hunter, Cynthia (LDH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Momoli, Nora (JD) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Hemphill, Dr. Afia (JH) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Fullbright, Lisa Ratrell (LDH) Alt. 1 12-03-24 11-30-26 Vacant (LDH) Alt. 2 11-30-26
[14] Mobilehome Park Rental Review Board*
Established by: Ordinance No. 79-485U, §4702; § 607 of the City Charter Membership:

Qualification:

Meetings: 2nd and 4th Wednesday, 6:30 p.m. (City Council Chambers) Staff Liaison: Tara Matthew, Interim Housing Program Manager x1708 Support Staff: Sandy Solis, Division Secretary x1325
Appointed Term Expires
Vacant (JH) At-large 11-30-26
Valdez, Daniel (JD) At-large 12-03-24 11-30-26
Vacant (AR) At-large 11-30-26
Clark Harris, Dr. Alice (LDH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Muhammad, Nafis (LDH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Perez, Karey (LDH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Hayes, Phyllis (LDH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Dzikowski, Barbara (LDH) Park owner 04-04-23 11-30-26
Forbath, Susy (LDH) Park owner 04-04-23 11-30-26
Horton, Maria (LDH) Park owner Alt. [1] 04-04-23 11-30-26 Vacant (LDH) Park owner Alt. [2] 11-30-26
Gonzalez, Leonor (LDH)** Resident homeowner 11-21-23 11-30-26 King, Tom (CH) Resident homeowner 01-17-23 11-30-26
Davis, William (LDH) Resident homeowner Alt. [1] 04-04-23 11-30-26 Richardson, Sheila (LDH) Resident homeowner Alt. [2] 08-08-24 11-30-26 At-large Alt. [1]
At-large Alt. [2]
At-large Alt. [3]
Ordinance No. 09-1423 (CMC §61119); Amended by Resolution No. 19-027; Amended by Resolution No. 21-030
At-large Alt. [4]
See membership.
7 members (2 resident homeowners, 2 park owners, 3 at-large who are residents of the City and not homeowners, park owners, landlords, property managers or tenants in multifamily housing); 8 alternates (2 resident homeowners, 2 park owners, 4 at-large) Article VI, §602 of the City Charter: To be qualified for appointment, the member shall be a qualified elector of the City, shall be domiciled in the City for at least sixty (60) days immediately preceding their appointment, and shall continue to reside in the City for the duration of his or her tenure, unless otherwise provided by ordinance.

The mayor and each member of the city council may appoint one member to a position on each City board, committee or commission, and the remaining membership positions shall be appointed by the mayor and approved by a majority of the city council, including the three alternates.

Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 8
[15] Relocation Appeals Board
Established by: Ordinance No. 74-313 (CMC § 21004)
Membership: 9 members; 3 alternates
Qualification: Resident of the City of Carson.

Meetings: Only when necessary
Staff Liaison:

Support Staff: Sandy Solis, Economic Development Liaison x1325 Appointed Term Expires
Batucal, Dennis (LDH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Evans, Linda (LDH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Tate, Dorothy (LDH)** 01-23-24 11-30-26
Guray, Jr., Tancredo "Jun" (JD) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Witherspoon, Murphy (LDH) 01-07-25 11-30-26
Anson, Jr., Oscar (LDH) 01-23-24 11-30-26
Vacant (CH) 11-30-26
[Vacant] (JH) 11-30-26
Vacant (AR) 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 1 11-30-26
Morrison, Chris (LDH) Alt. 2 12-03-24 11-30-26
Vacant (LDH) Alt. 3 11-30-26
Saied Naaseh, Director of Community Development x1770
Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 9
III. SPECIAL COMMITTEE
[16] General Plan Advisory Committee
Established by Minute Action 10-03-17; Amended by Resolution No. 19-029; Amended by Resolution No. 21-031 Membership: 7 members; 2 alternates
Meetings: Only when necessary
Staff Liaison: McKina Alexander, Senior Planner x1326
Support Staff: Planning Technician x1327
Appointed Term Expires
Mayor Lula Davis-Holmes (LDH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Councilmember Jim Dear (JD) 12-03-24 11-30-26
Brimmer, Charlotte (LDH)** 04-04-23 11-30-26
Dudley-Kimble, Monica (CH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Gonzalez, Leonor (AR) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Hamilton, Dr. John (JH) 04-04-23 11-30-26
Sheriff Department Representative (LDH) 04-04-23 11-30-26 Cottrell-Fulbright, Lisa (LDH) Alt. 1 04-04-23 11-30-26 Lott, Aminika (LDH) Alt. 2 04-04-23 11-30-26
IV. SPECIAL BOARD
[17] Carson Reclamation Joint Powers Authority (CRJPA)
Established by Resolution No. 15-01-CRJPA; Resolution No. 21-02-CRJPA Membership: 5 members
Meetings: 1st Monday, 4:00 p.m. (Helen Kawagoe Council Chambers) Staff Liaison: John Raymond, Executive Director x1773
Support Staff: Sylvia Rubio, Executive Assistant x1318
Appointed Term Expires
Authority Chair Lula Davis-Holmes 06-07-21 06-07-26
Vice Chair Cedric Hicks 06-07-21 06-07-26
Board Member Ray Aldridge, Jr. 01-26-21 01-26-26
Board Member Lillian Hopson 01-21-21 01-21-26
Board Member Dianne Thomas 01-21-21 01-21-26
Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 10
V. COUNCIL SUB-COMMITTEES
[18] Bingo/Fireworks/Refuse Ad Hoc Committee
Established by Minute Order 04-02-19
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes 12-03-24
Councilmember Rojas 12-03-24
[19] Community Development/Housing/Logistics & Transit Standing Committee Established by Minute Order 04-02-19
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes 12-03-24
Councilmember Hicks 12-03-24
[20] Dignity Health Sports Park/CSUDH/Community Center Standing Committee Established by Minute Order 04-02-19
Appointed
Councilmember Hicks 06-01-21
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton 06-01-21
[21] Legislative Ad Hoc Committee
Established by Minute Order 02-16-21
Appointed
Mayor Pro Tempore Dr. Hilton 12-03-24
Councilmember Hicks 12-03-24
[22] City Hall/Community Center Renovation Ad Hoc Committee Established by Minute Order 01-26-21
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes 01-26-21
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton 01-26-21
[23] Economic Development/E-Commerce Ad Hoc Committee
Establised by Minute Order 03-02-21
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes 03-02-21
Councilmember Hicks 03-02-21
[24] Conditional Use Permit Ad Hoc Committee
Established by Minute Order 04-05-22
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes 04-05-22
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton 04-05-22
Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 11
[25] Housing Ad Hoc Committee
Established by Minute Order 03-16-21
Appointed
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton 12-03-24
Councilmember HiltonCouncilmember Hicks 12-03-24
[26] Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Ad Hoc Committee
Established by Minute Order 09-07-21
Appointed
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton 09-07-21
Councilmember Rojas 03-01-22
[27] Standard Management Procedures and Special Events Ad Hoc Committee Established by Minute Order 01-04-22
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes 01-04-22
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton 01-04-22
[28] Cell 2 Settlement Ad Hoc Committee
Established by Minute Order 02-07-22 (Carson Reclamation Authority) Appointed
Mayor Davis-HolmesAuthority Chair Lula Davis-Holmes 02-07-22 Mayor Pro Tempore HiltonBoard Member Dianne Thomas 02-07-22 [29] School Safety Ad Hoc Committee
Established by Minute Order 12-03-24Established by Minute Order 02-15-22 Appointed
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton 12-03-24
Councilmember Rojas 12-03-24
Captain Jones Norman 12-03-24
[30] Carson Finance and Audit Committee
Established by Minute Order 06-20-23
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes 06-20-23
Councilmember Rojas 06-20-23
[31] Short-Term Rentals Ad Hoc Committee
Established by Minute Order 03-02-21
Established by Minute Order 10-03-23
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes 10-03-23
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton 10-03-23
[32] Special Event Ad Hoc Committee
Established by Minute Order 06-06-24
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes 06-06-24
Mayor Pro Tempore Dr. Hilton 06-06-24
[33] LA '28 Olympics Ad Hoc Committee
Established by Minute Order 07-16-24
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes 07-16-24
Mayor Pro Tempore Dr. Hilton 07-16-24
Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 12
[34] Refinery Ad Hoc Committee
Established by Minute Order 12-03-24
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes 12-03-24
Councilmember Hicks 12-03-24
[35] Grocery Store Ad Hoc Committee
Established by Minute Order 06-18-24
Appointed
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton Member 06-18-24
Councilmember Hicks Member 06-18-24
[36] Gil Smith Memorial Ad Hoc Committee
Established by Minute Order 01-07-25
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes 01-07-25
Mayor Pro Tempore Dr. Hilton 01-07-25
VI. CITY AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS
[37] California Contract Cities Association
Appointed
Councilmember Hicks Delegate 12-03-24
Mayor Davis-Holmes Alt. 12-03-24
[38]
Appointed
Councilmember Hicks Delegate 11-15-22
Councilmember Rojas Alt. 1 12-03-24
Staff Member Reata Kulcsar Alt. 2 11-15-22
[39] County of Los Angeles Public Library Commission
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes Delegate 12-03-24
[40]
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes Delegate 01-26-21
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton Alternate 12-03-24
Ord. No. 17-1633; LACCE Joint Powers Agreement (Authority) Clean Power Alliance
Automatic designation of Mayor as Delegate per Health and Safety Code Section 4730. City Council as governing body, must select an alternate to act in place of presiding officer (Mayor) in absence, inability, or refusal to act.

County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles (Dist. No. 8)* Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 13
[41]
Appointed Term Expires
Councilmember Dear Delegate 01-26-21 01-05-26
(effective 01-03-22)
The District’s governing power is vested in its 35 members of the Board of Trustees. One trustee is appointed by each of the 34 cities and the County Board of Supervisors appoints one to represent unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County.

To be appointed, the member must reside in and be a resident voter of the representative city (or county for county member) in the District. Board member duties and responsibilities include setting policy, establishing the budget, approving expenditures, and retaining legal counsel. The vector Trustee appointment and term are governed by the State Health and Safety Code and begin and end on the first Monday in January. Additionally, the State Health and Safety Code does not allow for alternate members to be appointed.

Greater Los Angeles County Vector Control District (Formerly SE Mosquito Abatement)* Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 14
[42] L.A. County City Selection Committee
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes Delegate 01-26-21
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton Alt. 01-23-24
[43] League of California Cities
Appointed
Councilmember Rojas Delegate 03-01-22
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton Alt. 1 01-26-21
Mayor Davis-Holmes Alt. 2 12-03-24
[44] League of California Cities (Los Angeles Co. Division) Appointed
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton Delegate 12-03-24
Councilmember Rojas Alt. 1 01-26-21
Mayor Davis-Holmes Alt. 2 12-03-24
Per Government Code Section 50270, the membership of each such City Selection Committee shall consist of the Mayor of each city within the county. Members of the LA County City Selection Committee include the Mayor of each city within Los Angeles County. Each city appoints an elected official as a delegate to the City Selection Committee; it usually is the Mayor. The term of office for each Member of the LA County City Selection Committee coincides with City Mayor terms, and the Committee meets three or four times a year, at the call of the Chairman. Their duties are to appoint City representatives to such Boards, Commissions and Agencies as may be required by law, i.e., LAFCO, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Advisory Committee; and to nominate for appointment Members to the California Coastal Commission. Nominations for the City Selection Committee appointees to the MTA are made by the Sector Subcommittees for the Sectors whose representatives’ terms are expiring. The cities assigned to one of the four regions in Los Angeles County. Nominations for the City Selection Committee appointees to the MTA are made by the Sector Subcommittees for the Sectors whose representatives’ terms are expiring. The cities assigned to one of the four regions in Los Angeles County (North County/San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Southeast Long Beach and Southwest Corridor) shall meet as a Sector Subcommittee. Each candidate with a majority weighted vote will then be nominated from that Sector for consideration for appointment to the MTA.

Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 15
[45] National League of Cities
Appointed
Councilmember Hicks Delegate 01-26-21
Councilmember Rojas Alt. 1 12-03-24
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton Alt. 2 12-03-24
[46] South Bay Cities Council of Govts (Joint Powers Authority) Appointed
Councilmember Hicks Delegate 01-26-21
Mayor Davis-Holmes Alt. 12-03-24
[47] South Bay Workforce Investment Board
Appointed Term Expires
Ted Cordova Member 06-18-24 06-30-28
Jeffrey Jennison Member 06-18-24 06-30-28
Janice Jimenez Member 07-01-21 06-30-25
Tamala Lewis Member 07-01-19 06-30-23
Tami Lorenzen-Fanselow Member 07-01-19 06-30-23
[48] Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Appointed
Mayor Pro Tempore Hilton Delegate 01-26-21
Mayor Davis-Holmes Alt. 1 01-26-21
Councilmember Rojas Alt. 2 12-03-24
[49] U.S. Conference of Mayors
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes Delegate 01-26-21
Councilmember Rojas Alt. 1 03-01-22
Councilmember Hicks Alt. 2 01-26-21
[50] West Basin Water Association
Appointed
Mayor Davis-Holmes Delegate 12-03-24
Councilmember Hicks Alt. 01-26-21
Agenda Report January 21, 2025 Exhibit 1 16

← All documents from this meeting