Cathedral City
Pavement Management Program (PMP) Review
Presented By
John A. Corella, P.E.
-
Director of Engineering/Public Works
∗ Widely implemented industry tool that evaluates the pavement conditions and is used to program maintenance and/or
rehabilitation of local streets and roads.
Pavement Management Program
What is a PMP?
Pavement Management Program
Purpose
∗ To maintain Cathedral City’s investment in its street network in the best condition possible given the available funding
∗ Answers 4 main questions
1. What streets does the City own/maintain?
2. What condition are they in?
3. What repairs are needed & when?
4. How much funding is needed to maintain or improve streets? Pavement Management Program
Street Inventory
Centerline
Mileage
# of
Sections Pavement Area (sf)
%
Pavement
Area
Weighted
Average PCI 2023
Arterial 14.8 107 6,262,492 17.5% 62
Collector 23.3 140 7,351,140 20.7% 57
Residential/Local 118.9 1149 21,954,212 61.8% 67
Grand Total 157.0 1396 35,529,524 100.0% 64
Pavement Management Program
Pavement Condition Categories
Placentia St.
El Prado Ave. to San Altos Pl.
City-wide Average PCI = 64
64 Pavement Management Program
Coachella Valley PCI Breakdown
80 78 75 75 74 73
69 68
64 0
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
La Quinta Desert Hot
Springs
Rancho
Mirage
Indian
Wells
Palm
Desert
Palm
Springs
Indio Coachella Cathedral
City
Statewide Average PCI = 66
Pavement Management Program
Good Pavement Condition
Placentia St.
El Prado Ave. to San Altos Pl.
Willow Ln
Kenwood to Camrose
PCI=97
30th Ave
Vicinity of Descanso Circle
PCI=80
Pavement Management Program
Fair and Poor Pavement Conditions
Cypress Rd
Pinnacle to Augusta
PCI=61
Date Palm Dr
Adelina to Los Gatos
PCI=48
Pavement Management Program
Poor and Very Poor Conditions
33rd Ave
Desert Vista to Via de Anza
PCI=33
Varner Rd
West of Date Palm
PCI=20
Pavement Management Program
Cathedral City PCI Map
Pavement Management Program
Cathedral City PCI Breakdown
Very Good
4.3%
Good
31.4%
Fair
46.8%
Poor
15.2%
Very Poor
2.2%
Network
Very Good: PCI 100-90
Good: PCI 89-70
Fair: PCI 69-50
Poor: PCI 49-25
Very Poor: PCI 24-0
Good
34.8%
Fair
34.8%
Poor
30.4%
Arterial
Good
16.1%
Fair
60.3%
Poor
13.1%
Very Poor
10.6%
Collector Very Good
7.0%
Good
35.7%Fair
45.7%
Poor
11.6%
Local
Pavement Management Program
Ideal Pavement Treatment Strategies
Pavement Management Program
Cycle of Road Maintenance
∗ Roadway maintenance base on 6-year cycle and 24-year life:
∗ Step 1: Reconstruct roadway (year 1)
∗ Step 2: Re-slurry roadway at year 6
∗ Step 3: Re-slurry roadway at year 12
∗ Step 4: Re-slurry roadway at year 18
∗ Step 5: Reconstruct roadway (year 24)
∗ Based on:
∗ Roadway condition (PCI)
∗ Available funding (City’s general fund/grant funding) ∗ Attention to roads recently reconstructed
∗ Get into the cycle of maintenance
∗ Maintain as best possible, roads that need reconstruction ∗ Until funding available for reconstruction
Pavement Management Program
Decisions
Pavement Management Program
Budget Needs
Fiscal Year Current 23/24 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 Total Budget Needs ($M) NA $ 53.5 $ 1.4 $ 2.1 $ 0.1 $ 0.4 $ 57.5 Rehabilitation ($M) NA $ 48.9 $ 1.0 $ 1.7 $ 0.0 $ 0.4 $ 52.0 Preventive Maintenance ($M) NA $ 4.6 $ 0.4 $ 0.4 $ 0.1 $ 0.0 $ 5.5 Treated PCI 64 82 79 78 76 74 NA
Untreated PCI/Do Nothing 64 64 62 60 57 55 NA
Pavement Management Program
Budget Scenarios
∗ Scenario 1: City’s Existing Budget ($2.0 Mil annually) ∗ Scenario 2: Maintain PCI at 64 ($2.0 Mil to $11.9 Mil annually) ∗ Scenario 3: Increase by 1 PCI point per year ($2.0 Mil to $15.1 Mil annually) ∗ Scenario 4: Untreated (No Pavement Treatment)
Pavement Management Program
Scenario Comparison
64 59
64 69
55 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
2023 23/24 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28
PCI
Fiscal Year
S1: Existing Budget S2: Maintain PCI at 64 S3: Improve PCI to 69 S4:Untreated Current
Pavement Management Program
Magnitude of Scale of the Cost of Paving Projects
∗ East Palm Canyon REAS project (East City Limits to Cathedral Canyon) = $800 k ∗ Landau remediation project (Ramon Road to Vista Chino) = $5.0 mil ∗ Date Palm Drive reconstruction (Vista Chino to 30th Avenue) = $5.6 mil ∗ Varner Road reconstruction (Palm Drive to Date Palm Drive) = $27.0 mil Pavement Management Program
Summary
∗ Use the PMP and conduct pavement evaluation during the design phase to determine the most cost-effective solution
∗ Leverage any utility projects to include paving
∗ Determine how to increase paving budget by exploring impact fees ∗ Leverage local funding as match for federal/state grant funds Pavement Management Program
END