Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Cathedral City City Council
September 11, 2024

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
September 11, 2024
Body
Cathedral City City Council
Pages
43
Original file
158.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on cathedralcity.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

Phase 2 – Rosemount Road extension in place prior to opening year 2027. Access to the project site will be provided via one proposed driveway along Date Palm Drive, one proposed driveway along Rosemount Road, and one existing driveway along McCallum Way. Additionally, the Project will construct a traffic signal at the new intersection of Rosemount Road and Date Palm Drive. 

DATE PALM DRIVE MIXED USE PROJECT
SCOPING AGREEMENT | PAGE 1 OF 3

TRIP GENERATION FOR POTENTIAL USES
Trip generation is a measure or forecast of the number of trips that begin or end at the project site. The traffic generated is a function of the extent and type of development proposed for the site. These trips will result in some traffic increases on the streets where they occur. Per the Guidelines, project vehicular traffic generation characteristics should be estimated based on established rates contained in the Trip Generation Manual (TGM), 11th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Project ITE average trip generation rates are shown in Table 1.

Table 1
Project Trip Generation Rate
ITE LU
Code
822
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use1 Units2 Daily
In Out

1.11 1.34
Total

2.77 3.53
In Out

3.77 5.12
Total

7.54 9.84
Strip Retail Plaza (<40k)3
Shopping Plaza (40-150k)4
Fast Food Restaurant w/ Drivethrough Window
TSF
TSF

1.66 2.19

3.77 4.72

62.78 821 102.78
TSF
TSF
934
151

22.75 0.05

21.86 0.04

44.61 0.09

17.18 0.07

15.85 0.08

33.03 0.15
467.48
Mini-Warehouse 1.45
1Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021). 2TSF = Thousand Square Feet
3Peak hour and daily trip rates for LU 822 Strip Retail Plaza are based on fitted curve equations for total 11,159 sf of retail proposed for Scenario 1. 4PM peak hour and daily trip rates for LU 821 Shopping Plaza are based on fitted curve equations for total 54,725 sf of shopping plaza (supermarket plus retail) proposed for Scenario 2.

Table 2 summarizes the calculated trip generation associated with Scenario 1. As shown in Table 2, Scenario 1 is anticipated to generate approximately 1,696 total daily trips, 192 AM peak hour trips and 137 PM peak hour trips.

Table 2
Scenario 1 Project Trip Generation
AM Peak Hour
Out
PM Peak Hour Land Use1
Intensity Units2 Daily
In Total In Out Total
Phase 1
Mini-Warehouse
Phase 2
115.054

11.159
TSF
TSF
6 4 50 8 9 17 167
Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) 19
2 12
2 31
4 42
21 42
12 84
33 701
273 Internal Capture (11% - AM In, 17% - AM Out, 50% - PM In, 29% - PM Out, & 39% - Daily)3
Pass-by Reduction (40% - PM Peak Hour & Daily)5
Subtotal
0 0 0 8 12 20 171
17 10 27 13 18 31 257
Fast Food Restaurant w/ Drive-through
Window 7.030 TSF 160
2 154
2 314
4 121
12 111
21 232
33 3,286
460 Internal Capture (1% - AM In, 1% - AM Out, 10% - PM In, 19% - PM Out, 14% - Daily)3
Pass-by Reduction (50% - AM Peak Hour, 55% - PM Peak Hour & Daily)4
Subtotal
79 76 155 49 40 89 1,272
79 76 155 49 40 89 1,272
Scenario 1 Total 102 90 192 70 67 137 1,696

DATE PALM DRIVE MIXED USE PROJECT
SCOPING AGREEMENT | PAGE 2 OF 3
1Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021). 2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet
3 Internal Capture percentage is based on NCHRP Report 684, as recommended in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, and included in Attachment 2.
4 Pass-by reduction percentage is based on the ITE methodology per 2021 Pass-By Tables for ITE Trip Generation Appendices. 5 Used the same Pass-by reduction percentage as LU 821 Shopping Plaza.

Table 3 summarizes the calculated trip generation associated with Scenario 2. As shown in Table 1-3, Scenario 2 would be anticipated to generate approximately 3,542 total daily trips, 243 AM peak hour trips and 340 PM peak hour trips. This results in an increase of 1,846 daily trips, an increase of 51 AM peak hour trips, and an increase of 203 PM peak hour trips when compared to Scenario 1. However, Scenario 1 would result in 12 additional AM peak hour outbound trips. Therefore, Scenario 2 will be the governing scenario for analysis and only the intersection AM peak hour will be analyzed for Scenario 1 as supplemental analysis.

Table 1-3
Scenario 2 Project Trip Generation
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use1
Intensity Units2 Daily
In Out Total In Out Total
Phase 1
Mini-Warehouse
Phase 2
Shopping Plaza (40-150k)
115.054

54.725
TSF
TSF
6 4 50 8 9 17 167
120
0 73
0 193
0 258
103
155
163
68 280
112
168
177
65 538
215
323
340
133
+203
5,625
2,250
3,375
3,542
1,668
+1,846
Pass-by Reduction (40% - PM Peak Hour & Daily)3
Subtotal 120
126
99 73
78 89
-12
193
243
188
+51
Scenario 2 Total
Scenario 1 Total
Net Difference (Scenario 2-Scenario 1) +24 +93 +110
1Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021). 2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet
3 Pass-by reduction percentage is based on the ITE methodology per 2021 Pass-By Tables for ITE Trip Generation Appendices.

STUDY AREA
The study area for this project was developed consistent with the Guidelines, which includes all intersections of two (2) or more “Collector” or higher classification streets, at which the proposed project will add 50 or more peak hour trips. Attachment 3 presents the study area that includes the key intersection and roadway segment locations identified in the scoping form.
24-hour segment and intersection counts will be conducted for one weekday (Tuesday through Thursday), with turning movements collected during the morning (7:00-9:00am) and evening (4:00-6:00) peak hours. The turning movement counts will be utilized in Synchro to determine level of service (LOS) at all study intersections.

TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Trip distribution and assignment is the process of identifying the probable destinations, directions and traffic routes that project related traffic will likely affect. Trip distribution and assignment information can be estimated from observed traffic patterns, experience or through use of a computerized travel forecast model. Once the proposed developments trips have been estimated, they are assigned to the study area network. For this project, the trip

DATE PALM DRIVE MIXED USE PROJECT
SCOPING AGREEMENT | PAGE 3 OF 3
distribution was developed based on the land use characteristics, surrounding land uses in the vicinity of the project site, anticipated travel patterns to and from the project site and existing travel patterns within the study area.

Attachments 3 and 4 show the project’s trip distribution and trip assignment, respectively.

ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
Analysis of the intersection operating conditions during the peak periods will be conducted for the following anticipated timeframe scenarios:




Existing Conditions Year 2023
Project Completion Year 2025 (Existing Plus Ambient Plus Project Phase 1) Project Completion Year 2027 (Existing Plus Ambient Plus Project Phases 1 & 2) Cumulative Year 2027 (Existing Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project) Ambient growth is 3% per year.

Specific issues to be addressed in the Study (in addition to the standard analysis described in the Guideline)
The Study will include intersection queue analysis to determine the lengths of the following potential exclusive lanes:


Southbound left turn lane length at the intersection of Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road Northbound right turn lane at the intersection of Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) ANALYSIS
IEG will conduct a VMT screening assessment per the Guidelines to demonstrate that the retail and industrial components of the project can be presumed to have a less than significant transportation VMT impact.

Sincerely,
Approved By:

Signature:

Name:

George Ghossain, MS, PE
Principal Engineer
Address:

Attachments: 1 – Project Site Plan
2 – Internal Capture Calculations
3 – Project Study Area & Trip Distribution
4 – Project Trip Assignment

DATE PALM DRIVE MIXED USE PROJECT
SCOPING AGREEMENT | PAGE 4 OF 3
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
Project Site Plan (Scenario 1)
Attachment 1a
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
Project Site Plan (Scenario 2)
Attachment 1b
Attachment 2 - Internal Capture Calculations
NCHRP 8-51 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool
Project Name:

Project Location:

Scenario Description:

Analysis Year:

Date Palm Dr Mixed Use Organization:

Performed By:

Date:

Date Palm Dr, Cathedral City, CA
Scenario 1
2023 Checked By:

Analysis Period: AM Street Peak Hour Date:

Table 1-A: Base Vehicle-Trip Generation Estimates (Single-Use Site Estimate) Development Data (For Information Only ) Estimated Vehicle-Trips Land Use ITE LUCs1 Quantity Units Total 0 Entering Exiting
Office
Retail 31
314
0 19 12
Restaurant 160 154
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential 0
Hotel 0
All Other Land Uses2
Total
0 345 179 166
Table 2-A: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates
Entering Trips Exiting Trips
% Transit
Land Use
Veh. Occ.

1.00 % Transit % Non-Motorized Veh. Occ.

1.00 % Non-Motorized
Office
Retail 1.00 1.00
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel

1.00 1.00
All Other Land Uses2
Table 3-A: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) Destination (To) Origin (From)
Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office
Retail
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
Table 4-A: Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix* Destination (To) Origin (From)
Office Retail
0 Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel
Office 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Retail 0
0 0
0 0
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Table 5-A: Computations Summary Table 6-A: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use Total
345
2%
Entering
179
Exiting
166
Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips
All Person-Trips Office N/A
Retail
N/A
11%
1%
Internal Capture Percentage 2% 2% 17%
Restaurant 1%
External Vehicle-Trips3
External Transit-Trips4
External Non-Motorized Trips4
337
0 175
0 162
0 Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 0 0 Hotel N/A
1Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Informational Report , published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site-not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator 3Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-A 4Person-Trips
*Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number.

Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas Transportation Institute Project Name: Date Palm Dr Mixed Use
Analysis Period: AM Street Peak Hour
Table 7-A: Conversion of Vehicle-Trip Ends to Person-Trip Ends Table 7-A (D): Entering Trips Table 7-A (O): Exiting Trips Land Use
Veh. Occ. Vehicle-Trips Person-Trips* Veh. Occ.

1.00 Vehicle-Trips Person-Trips*
Office 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 0
19 160
0 0
19 160
0 0
12 154
0 0
12 154
0 Retail 1.00
Restaurant 1.00
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential

1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0
Hotel 0 0 1.00 0 0
Table 8-A (O): Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix (Computed at Origin) Destination (To) Origin (From)
Office Retail
0 Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel
Office 0
2 0
0 0
0 2
6 0
0 0
5 0
0 Retail 3
48 0
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
22 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Table 8-A (D): Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix (Computed at Destination) Destination (To) Origin (From)
Office Retail
6 Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel
Office 37
80 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Retail 0
0 0
0 0
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
2 0
3 1
0 32
10 0
0 0
Table 9-A (D): Internal and External Trips Summary (Entering Trips) Person-Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode*
Destination Land Use
Internal External Total
0 Vehicles1 Transit2 Non-Motorized2
Office 0
2 2
0 0
0 0
0 17
158
0 0
17 158
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Retail 19
160
0 Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
0 0 0
0 0 0
All Other Land Uses3 0 0 0
Table 9-A (O): Internal and External Trips Summary (Exiting Trips) Person-Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode* Origin Land Use Internal External Total
0 Vehicles1 Transit2 Non-Motorized2
Office 0
2 2
0 0
0 0
0 10
152
0 0
10 152
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Retail 12
154
0 Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
0 0 0
0 0 0
All Other Land Uses3 0 0 0
1Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-A 2Person-Trips
3Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site-not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator *Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number.

NCHRP 8-51 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool
Project Name:

Project Location:

Scenario Description:

Analysis Year:

Date Palm Dr Mixed Use Organization:

Performed By:

Date:

Date Palm Dr, Cathedral City, CA
Scenario 1
2023 Checked By:

Analysis Period: PM Street Peak Hour Date:

Table 1-P: Base Vehicle-Trip Generation Estimates (Single-Use Site Estimate) Development Data (For Information Only ) Estimated Vehicle-Trips Land Use ITE LUCs1 Quantity Units Total 0 Entering Exiting
Office
Retail 84
232
0 42 42
Restaurant 121 111
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential 0
Hotel 0
All Other Land Uses2
Total
0 316 163 153
Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates
Entering Trips Exiting Trips
% Transit
Land Use
Veh. Occ.

1.00 % Transit % Non-Motorized Veh. Occ.

1.00 % Non-Motorized
Office
Retail 1.00 1.00
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel

1.00 1.00
All Other Land Uses2
Table 3-P: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) Destination (To) Origin (From)
Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office
Retail
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
Table 4-P: Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix* Destination (To) Origin (From)
Office Retail
0 Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel
Office 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Retail 0
0 0
0 0
12 Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
21 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
Table 5-P: Computations Summary Table 6-P: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use Total
316
Entering
163
Exiting
153
Land Use Entering Trips
N/A
Exiting Trips
All Person-Trips Office N/A
Internal Capture Percentage 21% 20% 22% Retail 50% 29%
Restaurant 10% 19%
External Vehicle-Trips3
External Transit-Trips4
250
0 130
0 120
0 Cinema/Entertainment
Residential

N/A N/A

N/A N/A
External Non-Motorized Trips4 0 0 0 Hotel N/A N/A
1Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Informational Report , published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site-not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator 3Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P 4Person-Trips
*Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number.

Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas Transportation Institute Project Name: Date Palm Dr Mixed Use
Analysis Period: PM Street Peak Hour
Table 7-P: Conversion of Vehicle-Trip Ends to Person-Trip Ends Table 7-P (D): Entering Trips Table 7-P (O): Exiting Trips Land Use Veh. Occ. Vehicle-Trips Person-Trips* Veh. Occ.

1.00 Vehicle-Trips Person-Trips*
Office 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 0
42 121
0 0
42 121
0 0
42 111
0 0
42 111
0 Retail 1.00
Restaurant 1.00
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential

1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0
Hotel 0 0 1.00 0 0
Table 8-P (O): Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix (Computed at Origin) Destination (To) Origin (From)
Office Retail
0 Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel
Office 0 0
2 9
0 11
20 0
0 2
8 0
0 Retail 1
3 0
0 0
12 Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
46 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
Table 8-P (D): Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix (Computed at Destination) Destination (To) Origin (From)
Office Retail
3 Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel
Office 2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Retail 0
0 0
0 0
35 Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
21 2 4
17 6
4 0
1 0 0
Table 9-P (D): Internal and External Trips Summary (Entering Trips) Person-Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode* Destination Land Use Internal External Total
0 Vehicles1 Transit2 Non-Motorized2
Office 0
21 12
0 0
21 109
0 0
21 109
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Retail 42
121
0 Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
All Other Land Uses3 0 0 0 0
Table 9-P (O): Internal and External Trips Summary (Exiting Trips) Person-Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode* Origin Land Use Internal External Total
0 Vehicles1 Transit2 Non-Motorized2
Office 0
12 21
0 0
30 90
0 0
30 90
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Retail 42
111
0 Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
All Other Land Uses3 0 0 0 0
1Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P 2Person-Trips
3Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site-not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator *Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number.

Land
Use
Unadjusted Project Trips1Internal Capture %2Internal Capture Project Trips3 PM Total %4
39%
PM In PM Out
42 PM Total PM In
50%
PM Out
29%
PM In PM Out
12 PM Total
Retail
Restaurant
42 84 21
12 33
121 111 232 10% 19% 21 33 14%
1Trip generation based on rates from Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021) 2 Internal Capture percentage is based on NCHRP Report 684, as recommended in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. 3 Internal Capture percentage from footnote 2 applied to trip generation from footnote 1 4Calculated internal capture percentage for total PM trips based on internal capture PM total trips column divided by unadjusted PM PM total trips column
List of Land Uses with Vehicle Pass-By Rates and Data
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual , 11th Edition
Institutional (Land Uses 500–599)

CODE LAND USE
565 Day Care Center
Retail (Land Uses 800–899)

CODE LAND USE
813
814
815
816
820
821
843
848
850
857
862
863
880
881
890
Free-Standing Discount Superstore
Variety Store
Free-Standing Discount Store
Hardware/Paint Store
Shopping Center (>150k)
Shopping Plaza (40-150k)
Automobile Parts Sales
Tire Store
Supermarket
Discount Club
Home Improvement Superstore
Electronics Superstore
Pharmacy/Drugstore without Drive-Through Window
Pharmacy/Drugstore with Drive-Through Window
Furniture Store
Services (Land Uses 900–999)

CODE LAND USE
912
931
932
934
935
938
944
945
Drive-in Bank
Fine Dining Restaurant
High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant
Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window
Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window and No Indoor Seating Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window and No Indoor Seating Gasoline/Service Station
Convenience Store/Gas Station
Vehicle Pass-By Rates by Land Use
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual , 11th Edition
Land Use Code
Land Use
821
Shopping Plaza (40 - 150k)
General Urban/Suburban
Weekday PM Peak Period
15 Setting
Time Period
# Data Sites
Average Pass-By Rate 40%
Pass-By Characteristics for Individual Sites
State or
Province
Florida
Survey Pass-By Non-Pass-By Trips Adj Street Peak
GLA (000)
45 Year # Interviews Trip (%) Primary (%) Diverted (%) Total (%) Hour Volume Source 1992
1992
1995
1993
1993
1995
1993
1992
1991
1992
1993
1993
1993
1990
1993
844
555
665
162
247
1583
109
365
702
336
133
281
210
176
—
56 41
42 59
31 40
25 46
55 34
22 28
53 32
36 24
41 33
—
53 38
42 —
23 —
50 50
30 44
39 20
18 25
—
16 22
33 —
22 —
28 22
17 24
25 44
59 58
41 69
60 75
54 45
66 78
72 47
68 64
—
—
30 30
30 30
34 30
34 30
30 30
34 34
34 24
34 50 Florida
52 Florida —
53 Florida —

57.23 60
Kentucky
Florida
2659
—

69.4 77
Kentucky
Florida
1559
—
78 Florida —
82 Florida —

92.857
100.888
121.54
144
Kentucky
Kentucky
Kentucky
New Jersey
Kentucky
3555
2111
2636
—
146.8 —

79.097

79.097

79.324

79.336

79.771
80 California
Oregon
2002
2001
2002
2001
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
1997
1997
2010
1997
2010
2002
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
1997
1997
—
—
15 13
20 34
38 38
12 25
12 25
31 32
15 38
21 7
64 52
58 39
44 44
68 52
68 52
46 55
49 47
41 45
56 48
64 54
55 48
44 21
35 22
27 18
18 20
23 20
23 23
13 36
15 38
48 28
33 21
29 27
19 30
85 87
80 66
62 62
88 75
88 75
69 68
85 62
79 93
84 81
85 83
82 67
74 —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
18 18
18 18
18 18
18 18
18 18
26 26
27 26
27 27
27 27
27 27
27 26
26 California
Washington
Nevada
—
—
—
Nevada 478
617
538
—
80 California
California
California
California
New York
New York
California
New York
Washington
Oregon
80 80.147

80.147
81 —
—

87.4 88
—
497

89.8 —
93 440
536
—
94 95 California
California
California
California
California
New York
New York
16 19
15 17
18 33
26 96 —
96 —
99 —
104 —
105.3
123.5
—
—
Vehicle Pass-By Rates by Land Use
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual , 11th Edition
Land Use Code
Land Use
934
Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window
Setting General Urban/Suburban
Time Period Weekday AM Peak Period
# Data Sites 5
Average Pass-By Rate 50%
Pass-By Characteristics for Individual Sites
Survey Pass-By Non-Pass-By Trips Adj Street Peak
GFA (000) State or Province Year # Interviews Trip (%) Primary (%) Diverted (%) Total (%) Hour Volume Source

1.4 3
Kentucky
Kentucky
--
1993
1993
1996
1993
1993
—
—
—
—
—
62 43
68 32
46 22
14 —
47 23
16 43
—
21 31
38 57
32 68
54 1407
2903
—
2 2

3.3 3.6

4.2 21
Kentucky 2
Indiana
437
1049 2
Vehicle Pass-By Rates by Land Use
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual , 11th Edition
Land Use Code
Land Use
934
Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window
General Urban/Suburban
Weekday PM Peak Period
11 Setting
Time Period
# Data Sites
Average Pass-By Rate 55%
Pass-By Characteristics for Individual Sites
Survey Pass-By Non-Pass-By Trips Adj Street Peak
GFA (000)

1.3 State or Province Year # Interviews Trip (%) Primary (%) Diverted (%) Total (%) Hour Volume Source Kentucky
Kentucky
Florida
Florida
Kentucky
Florida
Florida
Florida
—
1993
1993
1995
1996
1993
1995
1996
1996
1996
1993
1994
—
33 68
67 66
41 31
71 38
40 62
56 62
22 24
—
41 31
—
—
39 —
25 —
10 9
32 33
34 59
69 29
62 60
38 44
38 2055
2447
—
2 1.9 2

2.8 47 —
18 38
—
—
21 —
19 —
30 30
2 2.9 271
—
—
3 4250

3.1 28 — 30
30 30
21 2

3.1 29 —

3.2 202
—
—

3.3 —

4.2 Indiana
Florida
— 1632

4.3 304 — 30
15%
5%
4 20%
5%
25%
15% 20%
3 60%

PROJECT SITE
5 60%
40%
10%
15%
1 6
15%
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use - Study Area and Trip Distribution (Phase 1 Only) LEGEND # Instersecꢀon # Driveway Attachment 3a
15%
5%
4 20%
5%
25%
15% 5%
3 45%
30%

PROJECT SITE
25% 2
55%
5 30%
15%
15%
10%
15%
1 6
5%
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use - Study Area and Trip Distribution (Phase 1 and 2 Total) LEGEND # Instersecꢀon # Driveway Attachment 3b
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
Scenarios 1 & 2 Phase 1 Volumes
Attachment 4a
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
Scenario 1 Phases 1 & 2
AM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes
Attachment 4b
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
Scenario 2 Phases 1 & 2 Volumes
Attachment 4c

APPENDIX B -

TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA
CITY: Cathedral City
PM Period NB
PROJECT: SC4010 Tuesday, May 09, 2023
ADT1 Date Palm north of Mccallum. Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 AM Period NB SB SB
0:00
0:15
0:30
0:45
21 15
21 14
21 12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
126 128
19 151 145
11 13 64
150
149 576
130
71 148 551
51 40
39 63
135
89 1127
1287
1398
1600
1749
1573
1258
1062
899
1:00
1:15
1:30
1:45
14 21
10 6
6 17
6 13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
173 155
182 121
161 157
9 38 174 690 164 597
2:00
2:15
2:30
2:45
16 10
7 9
12 7
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
197 141
162 163
165 173
7 10 38 78 190 714 207 684
3:00
3:15
3:30
3:45
9 10
10 10
11 15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
207 165
6 204 163
13 205 172
16 46 85 231 847 253 753
4:00
4:15
4:30
4:45
11 15
17 20
6 16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
280 195
10 271 174
25 243 184
34 75 138
405
831
1299
1505
1034
1023
220 1014 182 735
5:00
5:15
5:30
5:45
33 33
62 30 17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
265 190
33 236 172
63 197 151
42 170 109 235 204 902 158 671
6:00
6:15
6:30
6:45
59 102 18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
206 160
67 134 140 125
71 143 183 141
86 283 169 548 168 697 135 561
7:00
7:15
7:30
7:45
91 94
188 19:00
19:15
19:30
19:45
136 126
169 151 117
126
95 406
130
248 116 129
288 893 152 555 135 507
8:00
8:15
8:30
8:45
200 20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
148 120
134 266 137 90
167 236 120 101
132 563 240 942 110 515 73 384
9:00
9:15
9:30
9:45
86 155 21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
117 70
125 131 111 72
116 156 116 62
121 448 144 586 87 431 79 283 714
10:00
10:15
10:30
10:45
104 141 22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
73 60
104 144 85 48
118 139 63 42
109 435 164 588 62 283 47 197 480
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
110 124 23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
62 32
119 157 39 28
152
133 514
181
158 620
33 40 174
28 1134 30 118 292
Total Vol. 3083 4673 7756 7398 6041 13439
Daily Totals
NB SB Combined
10481 10714 21195
AM PM
Split % 39.7%
8:00

60.3%
7:30

36.6% 55.0% 45.0% 63.4%
Peak Hour 7:45 15:45 15:45 15:45
Volume
P.H.F.
563

0.84 1002

0.87 1516

0.94 1025

0.94 806

0.80 1831

0.95 [email protected] Tell. 714 253 7888
CITY: Cathedral City
PM Period NB
PROJECT: SC4010 Tuesday, May 09, 2023
ADT2 Date Palm south of 30th. Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 AM Period NB SB SB
0:00
0:15
0:30
0:45
19 16
20 14
24 12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
130 125
18 143 144
10 13 65
157
152 582
133
69 155 557
41 39
40 63
134
77 1139
1264
1374
1609
1696
1551
1299
1073
917
1:00
1:15
1:30
1:45
14 10
11 6
6 13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
169 140
13 182 135
6 159 155
11 36 173 683 151 581
2:00
2:15
2:30
2:45
15 10
7 9 14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
186 151
11 167 155
8 154 177
7 10 38 77 193 700 191 674
3:00
3:15
3:30
3:45
10 9
11 15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
200 153
9 206 159
10 11
12 201 193
16 48 88 260 867 237 742
4:00
4:15
4:30
4:45
10 16
18 19
7 16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
264 176
12 250 187
24 243 162
37 80 143
412
830
1344
1472
1043
1092
233 990 181 706
5:00
5:15
5:30
5:45
28 35
65 28 17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
231 182
34 250 175
73 211 169
41 169 108 243 193 885 140 666
6:00
6:15
6:30
6:45
60 98 18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
212 156
69 141 151 130
70 137 184 147
83 282 172 548 176 723 143 576
7:00
7:15
7:30
7:45
93 203 19:00
19:15
19:30
19:45
141 128
108 193 157 119
116 236 115 138
112 429 283 915 155 568 120 505
8:00
8:15
8:30
8:45
121 212 20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
163 126
124 266 134 91
165 237 124 96
136 546 211 926 110 531 73 386
9:00
9:15
9:30
9:45
98 169 21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
117 65
116 125 116 77
121 152 123 60
123 458 139 585 79 435 73 275 710
10:00
10:15
10:30
10:45
112 147 22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
81 62
121 133 86 48
148 133 63 44
139 520 159 572 57 287 46 200 487
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
113 136 23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
65 30
120 150 37 27
146
137 516
171
146 603
38 40 180
33 1119 26 116 296
Total Vol. 3172 4659 7831 7431 5984 13415
Daily Totals
NB SB Combined
10603 10643 21246
AM PM
Split % 40.5%
11:45

59.5%
7:45

36.9% 55.4% 44.6% 63.1%
Peak Hour 7:45 15:45 15:30 15:45
Volume
P.H.F.
567

0.90 998

0.88 1520

0.95 1017

0.97 793

0.84 1779

0.89 [email protected] Tell. 714 253 7888
CITY: Cathedral City
PM Period NB
PROJECT: SC4010 Tuesday, May 09, 2023
ADT4 Date Palm north of Tortuga. Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 AM Period NB SB SB
0:00
0:15
0:30
0:45
19 19
23 13
29 12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
146 148
20 161 158
13 14 76
166
157 630
123
74 150 579
43 49
54 96
150
90 1209
1337
1542
1844
1918
1820
1425
1105
921
1:00
1:15
1:30
1:45
13 10
11 9
17 15
6 13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
191 131
193 144
159 165
9 47 179 722 175 615
2:00
2:15
2:30
2:45
17 13
9 11
11 8
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
215 169
177 166
183 180
10 11 41 90 239 814 213 728
3:00
3:15
3:30
3:45
15 10
11 18
11 15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
216 197
10 198 233
14 212 226
17 52 106 327 953 235 891
4:00
4:15
4:30
4:45
13 26
30 27
7 16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
297 197
14 282 204
30 271 203
34 85 181 262 1112 202 806
5:00
5:15
5:30
5:45
38 53
65 34 17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
283 210
42 270 227
55 243 207
68 224 107 238 462 204 1000 176 820
6:00
6:15
6:30
6:45
88 109 18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
234 176
109 147 192 152
129 152 219 148
135 461 189 597 1058
1815
1824
1180
1129
167 812 137 613
7:00
7:15
7:30
7:45
158 258 19:00
19:15
19:30
19:45
143 121
202 243 185 126
207 279 126 126
176 743 292 1072 156 610 122 495
8:00
8:15
8:30
8:45
185 274 20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
171 127
181 294 135 93
223 251 124 105
188 777 228 1047 93 523 73 398
9:00
9:15
9:30
9:45
128 182 21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
104 91
149 130 105 89
150 160 129 77
136 563 145 617 76 414 74 331 745
10:00
10:15
10:30
10:45
131 147 22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
79 76
136 151 69 67
115 155 70 56
130 512 164 617 67 285 49 248 533
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
136 135 23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
62 39
146 151 38 36
150
149 581
194
160 640
38 36 174
45 1221 32 152 326
Total Vol. 4177 5129 9306 8049 6676 14725
Daily Totals
NB SB Combined
12226 11805 24031
AM PM
Split % 44.9%
8:00

55.1%
7:30

38.7% 54.7% 45.3% 61.3%
Peak Hour 7:30 15:45 15:00 15:45
Volume
P.H.F.
777

0.87 1139

0.97 1888

0.97 1177

0.91 891

0.95 2016

0.90 [email protected] Tell. 714 253 7888
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS T218
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
DATE:

Tue, May 9, 23
LOCATION:

NORTH & SOUTH:

EAST & WEST:

Cathedral City
Date Palm
Mccallum
PROJECT #:

LOCATION #:

CONTROL:

SC4010
1 SIGNAL
NOTES: AM
PM
MD
▲
N
◄ W E ►
OTHER
OTHER
S
▼
Add U-Turns to Left Turns

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND U-TURNS
Date Palm Date Palm Mccallum
ET
1 Mccallum
WT
1 NL
1 NT
3 NR
0 SL
1 ST
3 SR
0 EL
1 ER
0 WL
1 WR
0 TOTAL NB
0 SB
0 EB
0 WB
0 TTL
LANES:
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
6 3
10 5
71 79
98 6
14 10
6 10
12 14
13 85
9%
969
14 6
13 14
22 32
16 13
163
152
228
264
164
223
208
219
1,621
88%
/
11 11
7 10
14 11
12 8
84 12
8 20
12 12
15 13
10 29
52 45
15 50
61 65
15 332
53%
/
26 20
34 26
22 23
23 15
12 16
18 18
11 12
18 9
17 37
48 50
21 27
34 35
269
58%
/
8 7
8 10
8 6
18 16
81 17%
418
375
405
539
503
450
546
573
468
3,859
0 0
0 2
0 0
1 0
3 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
1 1
1 0
5 73
7 109
112
136
106
784
84%
/
7:45 AM
430
84%

0.771
/
238
237
219
188
234
212
168
177
1,673
84%
/
4:00 PM
882
86%

0.928
/
12 16
9 68
7%
937
VOLUMES 130
7%
1,835
102
16%
623
189
30%
545
114
25%
464
APPROACH %

APP/DEPART

BEGIN PEAK HR

VOLUMES
APPROACH %

PEAK HR FACTOR

APP/DEPART
4:00 PM
5%
1,927 0
40 8%
42 8%
84 8%
859
87%

0.859
/
47 5%
52 15%
191
57%

0.834
/
25 45
19 22
17 26
25 20
199
40%
/
94 28%
59 25%
132
57%

0.747
/
49 37
20 21
25 32
24 14
222
51%
/
42 18%
2,072

0.904
512 0
17 19
24 23
29 37
19 26
526
22 14
11 16
14 14
9 14
990
13 8
15 13
12 7
1,015
17 6
14 6
6 20
9 337
22 24
10 26
18 15
19 16
315
17 18
15 22
16 22
23 17
233
28 15
9 18
8 19
13 15
216
18 10
14 5
12 9
9 9
86 20%
500
165
160
155
163
172
145
133
138
1,231
88%
/
631
593
525
523
563
558
460
466
4,319
0 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
2 2
0 0
1 1
0 1
2 7
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
1 1
2 0
1 2
9 4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
9 12
89 6%
1,406
8 VOLUMES 194
10%
1,981
114
6%
1,916
86 6%
1,508
150
30%
499
150
30%
395
125
29%
433
APPROACH %

APP/DEPART

BEGIN PEAK HR

VOLUMES
APPROACH %

PEAK HR FACTOR

APP/DEPART
0 83
8%
63 6%
49 7%
643
87%

0.942
/
43 6%
82 31%
111
42%

0.761
/
72 27%
70 29%
127
52%

0.642
/
47 19%
2,272

0.900
1,028 1,014 735 786 265 220 244 252 0
Date Palm

NORTH SIDE
Mccallum WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Mccallum

SOUTH SIDE
Date Palm
PEDESTRIAN + BIKE CROSSINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

N SIDE S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE

BICYCLE CROSSINGS

N SIDE S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE TOTAL TOTAL
1 2
1 2
5 3
4 4
NS
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
SS
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
2 ES
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 WS
1 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
TOTAL
0 0
1 0
1 0
2 0
4 0
1 0
0 1
2 1
3 8
1 1
0 0
0 0
1 2
5 1
0 0
2 3
3 1
0 10
2 2
1 2
5 5
5 5
27 0
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 1
0 0
1 1
1 2
6 1
1 0
0 0
0 1
2 5
0 0
0 2
3 2
1 0
8 1
0 0
0 0
2 1
1 22 5
14 1 2
AM BEGIN PEAK HR 7:45 AM 2 3 1 8
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
TOTAL
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
2 1
1 0
2 2
0 8
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
2 1
1 0
0 1
0 0
5 3
4 2
2 0
3 2
0 16
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 1
1 0
2 2
0 7
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
2 1
1 1
0 0
1 0
0 4
2 3
2 2
0 3
2 0
14 9
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
PM BEGIN PEAK HR 4:00 PM 1 3 2 3
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Date Palm
3,241 170 2,852 219 TOTAL 2,885
1,406
1,835
86 84
1,231
1,621
89 130
PM
AM
1,916
969
Cathedral City
SC4010

ALL HOURS
1,927
1,508
AM
PM
68 194
784
1,673
85 114
937
1,981
3,435 TOTAL 262 2,457 199 2,918
Date Palm
Date Palm
1,725 90 1,502 133
49 84
TOTAL
PM
AM
1,540
735
990
43 47
643
859
1,014
526

PEAK HOUR
AM 7:45 AM
PM 4:00 PM
1,015
786
AM
PM
40 83
430
882
42 63
512
1,028
1,801 Total 123 1,312 105 1,540
Date Palm
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS T218
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
DATE:

Tue, May 9, 23
LOCATION:

NORTH & SOUTH:

EAST & WEST:

Cathedral City
Date Palm
30th
PROJECT #:

LOCATION #:

CONTROL:

SC4010
3 SIGNAL
NOTES: AM
PM
MD
▲
N
◄ W E ►
OTHER
OTHER
S
▼
Add U-Turns to Left Turns

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND U-TURNS
Date Palm Date Palm 30th
ET
1 30th
WT
1 NL
1 NT
3 NR
0 SL
1 ST
3 SR
0 EL
1 ER
0 WL
1 WR
0 TOTAL NB
0 SB
0 EB
0 WB
0 TTL
LANES:
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
6 9
14 15
9 13
15 16
97 10%
975
84 88
87 87
102
96 3
11 15
10 10
15 18
7 89
51 67
64 52
70 100
78 40
522
24%
2,178
188
161
193
255
184
205
178
167
1,531
70%
/
17 19
16 20
17 13
12 11
31 40
50 33
26 15
19 22
24 48
72 57
45 70
66 33
415
50%
13 29
30 18
15 29
26 23
183
22%
3 3
13 10
13 31
31 20
17 34
37 35
38 68
73 52
354
37%
/
37 68
67 52
56 68
70 53
474
577
658
644
585
723
718
557
4,936
0 0
0 0
0 1
2 1
4 0
0 0
1 2
0 0
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
0 1
2 1
2 1
8 132
113
789
81%
/
7:45 AM
417
80%

0.791
/
206
207
198
197
207
211
186
149
1,561
83%
/
4:00 PM
808
82%

0.938
/
VOLUMES 125
6%
1,841
236
28%
834
124
13%
949
471
50%
572
APPROACH %

APP/DEPART

BEGIN PEAK HR

VOLUMES
APPROACH %

PEAK HR FACTOR

APP/DEPART
4:00 PM
9%
1,499 / 1,024 0
52 10%
53 10%
300
25%
822
69%

0.905
/
62 5%
93 22%
238
57%

0.919
/
37 31
32 26
37 28
26 43
260
46%
/
88 21%
85 16%
214
39%

0.783
/
79 41
56 43
37 45
37 36
374
42%
/
246
45%
2,670

0.923
522 0
50 35
34 28
19 28
21 25
759
8 8
11 8
5 11
4 19
74 4%
2,172
1,184
46 32
41 35
26 45
34 40
998
23 24
27 20
26 20
28 27
419
21 28
12 22
26 23
17 16
588
24 22
19 21
14 14
12 17
545
16 7
9 9
9 4
4 8
325
91 61
60 47
54 44
42 45
129
152
131
147
158
154
150
108
1,129
70%
/
730
648
630
603
618
627
561
533
4,950
7 6
3 4
1 3
3 7
34 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 6
3 4
1 4
4 7
36 4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
VOLUMES 240
13%
1,875
299
18%
1,623
195
12%
1,372
165
29%
568
143
25%
631
66 7%
884
444
50%
775
APPROACH %

APP/DEPART

BEGIN PEAK HR

VOLUMES
APPROACH %

PEAK HR FACTOR

APP/DEPART
0 147
15%
35 4%
154
19%
559
69%

0.970
/
94 12%
83 28%
126
43%

0.899
/
86 29%
41 8%
219
42%

0.698
/
259
50%
2,611

0.894
990 1,150 807 706 295 315 519 440 0
Date Palm

NORTH SIDE
30th WEST SIDE EAST SIDE 30th

SOUTH SIDE
Date Palm
PEDESTRIAN + BIKE CROSSINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

N SIDE S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE

BICYCLE CROSSINGS

N SIDE S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE TOTAL TOTAL
2 3
4 4
5 13
0 0
31 22
NS
0 3
2 0
0 3
0 0
SS
4 ES
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 WS
0 TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
0 5
2 3
2 6
0 0
6 0
4 2
5 10
2 2
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
2 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 2
6 6
6 5
7 18
2 3
0 2
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
2 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
4 0 0 3
7:30 AM 0 4 0 0 2
7:45 AM 3 1 1 0 1
8:00 AM 2 3 2 0 2
8:15 AM 3 8 2 0 5
8:30 AM 0 0 2 0 2
8:45 AM 0 0 2 1 3
TOTAL 18 31 53 10
8 18
12 8 13 1 22
AM BEGIN PEAK HR 7:45 AM 2 0
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
TOTAL
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
2 2
1 0
0 0
1 2
0 6
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
3 3
2 1
0 2
1 2
0 11
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
2 0
3 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 3
1 2
1 0
1 0
2 0
7 4
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
1 2
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 4
PM BEGIN PEAK HR 4:00 PM 0 3
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Date Palm
3,801 320 2,660 821 TOTAL 3,671
1,623
2,178
195
125
1,129
1,531
299
522
PM
AM
2,172
1,499
Cathedral City
SC4010

ALL HOURS
1,841
1,372
AM
PM
97 240
789
1,561
89 74
975
1,875
3,213 TOTAL 337 2,350 163 2,850
Date Palm
Date Palm
1,991 156 1,381 454 TOTAL 1,909
807
1,184
94 62
559
822
154
300
PM
AM
1,150
759

PEAK HOUR
AM 7:45 AM
PM 4:00 PM
998
706
AM
PM
52 147
417
808
53 35
522
990
1,704 Total 199 1,225 88 1,512
Date Palm
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS T218
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
DATE:

Tue, May 9, 23
LOCATION:

NORTH & SOUTH:

EAST & WEST:

Cathedral City
Date Palm
Tachevah
PROJECT #:

LOCATION #:

CONTROL:

SC4010
4 NO CONTROL
NOTES: AM
PM
MD
▲
N
◄ W E ►
OTHER
OTHER
S
▼
Add U-Turns to Left Turns

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND U-TURNS
Date Palm Date Palm Tachevah
ET
X
Tachevah
WT
X
NL
1 NT
3 NR
X
SL
X
ST
3 SR
0 EL
0 ER
0 WL
X
WR
X

TOTAL NB
0 SB
0 EB
0 WB
0 TTL
LANES:
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
5 3
11 8
12 6
21 11
77 5%
1,513
153
195
196
168
173
175
199
177
1,436
95%
/
7:30 AM
712
95%

0.905
/
274
260
253
240
259
251
227
187
1,951
93%
/
4:30 PM
1,003
93%

0.972
/
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
246
228
263
272
248
260
235
204
1,956
99%
/
2 2
3 4
1 3
5 2
7 8
7 13
4 4
4 4
51 24%
216
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 12
15 16
20 26
34 18
24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
425
451
496
485
464
482
482
422
3,708
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
VOLUMES 22 1
1%
2,121
165
76%
1 APPROACH %

APP/DEPART

BEGIN PEAK HR

VOLUMES
APPROACH %

PEAK HR FACTOR

APP/DEPART
4:00 PM
0%
1,487
0%
1,978
0%
/
0%
1 0%
/
0%
99 0
37 5%
0 0%
0 0%
1,043
99%

0.955
/
11 1%
28 23%
0 0%

0.816
/
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0%
/
96 77%
0 0%
0 0%

0.250
/
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0%
/
0 0%
1,928

0.972
749 0
23 22
18 22
19 19
16 17
740
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1,054
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1,139
9 6
16 11
12 9
124
5 7
4 10
4 5
4 1
1 11
12 21
11 10
15 9
13 102
72%
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
48 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 186
192
187
191
200
212
198
163
1,529
96%
/
508
499
499
485
504
511
460
384
3,850
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
6 3
VOLUMES 156
7%
2,107
0 0 72
4%
1,631
40 28%
142
0 0%
0 0
0%
228
APPROACH %

APP/DEPART

BEGIN PEAK HR

VOLUMES
APPROACH %

PEAK HR FACTOR

APP/DEPART
0%
1,991
0%
1,601 0
78 7%
0 0%
0 0%
790
94%

0.948
/
48 6%
23 29%
0 0%

0.800
/
57 71%
0 0%
0 0%

0.000
/
0 0%
1,999

0.978
1,081 1,026 838 847 80 0 0 126 0
Date Palm

NORTH SIDE
Tachevah WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Tachevah

SOUTH SIDE
Date Palm
PEDESTRIAN + BIKE CROSSINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

N SIDE S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE

BICYCLE CROSSINGS

N SIDE S SIDE E SIDE W SIDE TOTAL TOTAL NS
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
SS
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 ES
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 WS
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
TOTAL
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
AM BEGIN PEAK HR 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
TOTAL
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
PM BEGIN PEAK HR 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Date Palm
3,579 94 3,485 0 TOTAL 3,478
1,601
1,978
72 22
1,529
1,956
0 0
PM
AM
1,991
1,487
Cathedral City
SC4010

ALL HOURS
2,121
1,631
AM
PM
77 156
1,436
1,951
0 0
1,513
2,107
3,752 TOTAL 233 3,387 0 3,620
Date Palm
Date Palm
1,892 59 1,833 0 TOTAL 1,766
838
1,054
48 11
790
1,043
0 0
PM
AM
1,026
740

PEAK HOUR
AM 7:30 AM
PM 4:30 PM
1,139
847
AM
PM
37 78
712
1,003
0 0
749
1,081
1,986 Total 115 1,715 0 1,830
Date Palm
RIVCOM 3 - 2018 AM peak period volumes

VISTA CHINO
1912 VISTA CHINO
2377
--
14 --
357 --
163
--
113
30TH AVE
848
30TH AVE
294
30TH AVE
485
30TH AVE
489
30TH AVE
392
30TH AVE
456
30TH AVE
391
30TH AVE
868

HCMTYPE
CC (6867)
Collector (8161)
Freeway (8427)
HOV (893)

RAMON RD
2570

RAMON RD
2974

RAMON RD
3679

RAMON RD
3608

RAMON RD
2520

RAMON RD
2851

RAMON RD
2520

RAMON RD
2851

RAMON RD
2766

RAMON RD
3145
Local (3067)
MinArterial (12486)
PrArterial (8422)
0 .05 .1 .15
Miles
RIVCOM 3 - 2018 Daily volumes

VISTA CHINO
8288 VISTA CHINO
8737
--
486
--
493 --
568
--
549
30TH AVE
2354
30TH AVE
2085
30TH AVE
1925
30TH AVE
1897
30TH AVE
1668
30TH AVE
1662
30TH AVE
2376
30TH AVE
2558

HCMTYPE
CC (6867)
Collector (8161)
Freeway (8427)
HOV (893)

RAMON RD
11651

RAMON RD
11586

RAMON RD
15308

RAMON RD
15219

RAMON RD
11334

RAMON RD
11244

RAMON RD
11334

RAMON RD
11244

RAMON RD
12457

RAMON RD
12374
Local (3067)
MinArterial (12486)
PrArterial (8422)
0 .05 .1 .15
Miles
RIVCOM 3 - 2018 PM peak period volumes

VISTA CHINO
2661 VISTA CHINO
2504
--
279
--
41 --
161
--
198
30TH AVE
520
30TH AVE
904
30TH AVE
619
30TH AVE
603
30TH AVE
563
30TH AVE
502
30TH AVE
959
30TH AVE
611

HCMTYPE
CC (6867)
Collector (8161)
Freeway (8427)
HOV (893)

RAMON RD
3650

RAMON RD
3301

RAMON RD
4510

RAMON RD
4660

RAMON RD
3534

RAMON RD
3234

RAMON RD
3534

RAMON RD
3234

RAMON RD
3888

RAMON RD
3547
Local (3067)
MinArterial (12486)
PrArterial (8422)
0 .05 .1 .15
Miles
RIVCOM 3 - 2045 AM peak period volumes

VISTA CHINO
2554 VISTA CHINO
2467

VISTA CHINO
180 VISTA CHINO
292
--
150
--
113
30TH AVE
861
30TH AVE
320
30TH AVE
440
30TH AVE
492
30TH AVE
354
30TH AVE
492
30TH AVE
407
30TH AVE
953

HCMTYPE
CC (6867)
Collector (8161)
Freeway (8427)
HOV (893)

RAMON RD
3524

RAMON RD
3427

RAMON RD RAMON RD
3917

RAMON RD
3336

RAMON RD
3767

RAMON RD
3212

RAMON RD
5812

RAMON RD
3243
4765

RAMON RD
3347
Local (3067)
MinArterial (12486)
PrArterial (8422)
0 .05 .1 .15
Miles
RIVCOM 3 - 2045 Daily volumes

VISTA CHINO
9935 VISTA CHINO
10112

VISTA CHINO
923 VISTA CHINO
912
--
557
--
531
30TH AVE
2405
30TH AVE
2151
30TH AVE
1683
30TH AVE
1691
30TH AVE
1597
30TH AVE
1644
30TH AVE
2521
30TH AVE
2762

HCMTYPE
CC (6867)
Collector (8161)
Freeway (8427)
HOV (893)

RAMON RD
13984

RAMON RD
14088

RAMON RD RAMON RD
15264

RAMON RD
15040

RAMON RD
13865

RAMON RD
13814

RAMON RD
18726

RAMON RD
17708
16725

RAMON RD
16283
Local (3067)
MinArterial (12486)
PrArterial (8422)
0 .05 .1 .15
Miles
RIVCOM 3 - 2045 PM peak period volumes

VISTA CHINO
2867 VISTA CHINO
3092

VISTA CHINO
322 VISTA CHINO
229
--
163
--
187
30TH AVE
544
30TH AVE
918
30TH AVE
559
30TH AVE
509
30TH AVE
559
30TH AVE
462
30TH AVE
1010
30TH AVE
641

HCMTYPE
CC (6867)
Collector (8161)
Freeway (8427)
HOV (893)

RAMON RD
4095

RAMON RD
4392

RAMON RD RAMON RD
4208

RAMON RD
4940

RAMON RD
3903

RAMON RD
4516

RAMON RD
4477

RAMON RD
6686
4329

RAMON RD
5709
Local (3067)
MinArterial (12486)
PrArterial (8422)
0 .05 .1 .15
Miles
AM PM
In Out
187
In Out
Model 2018 183 219
308

2.88%
209
226
367

2.77%
257
Model 2045 350 411
Annual Growth
Model 2023 Interpolated 187 219
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Date Palm
3,801 320 2,660 821 TOTAL 3,671
1,623
2,178
195
125
1,129
1,531
299
522
PM
AM
2,172
1,499
Cathedral City
SC4010

ALL HOURS
1,841
1,372
AM
PM
97 240
789
1,561
89 74
975
1,875
3,213 TOTAL 337 2,350 163 2,850
Date Palm
Date Palm
1,991 156 1,381 454 TOTAL 1,909
807
1,184
94 62
559
822
154
300
PM
AM
1,150
759
AM PM
45%
39%
16%
50%
42%
8%

PEAK HOUR
AM 7:45 AM
PM 4:00 PM
998
706
AM
PM
52 147
417
808
53 35
522
990
1,704 Total 199 1,225 88 1,512
Date Palm
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
Developed Year 2023
AM/PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes

APPENDIX C -

EXISTING CONDITIONS PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Date Palm Drive & McCallum Way
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/27/2023
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
52 52
0 191
191
0 94
94 0
59 59
0 132
132
0 42
42 0
40 40
0 430
430
0 42
42 0
84 84
0 859
859
0 47
47 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00 1.00
No
1870
212

0.90 2
362

0.31 1178
0 1.00
No
1870
147

0.90 2
415

0.31 1352
0 1.00
No
1870
478

0.90 2
1374

0.29 4726
342
1702

3.0 1.00
No
1870
954

0.90 2
1604

0.32 4946
656
1702

6.1 1870
58 0.90
2 456

0.31 1187
58 1187

1.5 1870
104

0.90 2
178

0.31 578
316
1756

5.7 1870
66 0.90
2 356

0.31 1062
66 1062

2.1 1870
47 0.90
2 133

0.31 432
194
1784

3.2 1870
44 0.90
2 1870
47 0.90
2 133

0.29 458
183
1780

3.0 1870
93 0.90
2 147

0.08 1781
93 1781

1.9 1870
52 0.90
2 87 87

0.05 1781
44 1781

0.9 0.9

1.00 87

0.50 237

1.00 1.00

17.4 4.4

0.32 269
350
1811

6.1 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0

0.0 4.7 5.7 7.8 0.0 3.2 3.0 3.0 1.9 6.1 6.1

1.00 456

0.13 913

1.00 1.00

11.9 0.1

0.33 539

0.59 1215

1.00 1.00

11.0 1.0

1.00 356

0.19 765

1.00 1.00

14.3 0.2

0.24 548

0.35 1235

1.00 1.00

10.1 0.4

0.26 518

0.35 663

1.00 1.00

10.5 0.4

1.00 147

0.63 379

1.00 1.00

16.7 4.4

0.15 587

0.60 819

1.00 1.00

10.6 1.0
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0

0.00 0

1.00 0.00

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0
990

0.35 1268

1.00 1.00

10.5 0.2
1104

0.59 1540

1.00 1.00

10.6 0.5

0.0 0.3

0.0 0.0

0.0 1.9

0.0 0.5

0.0 1.1

0.0 0.4

0.0 0.8

0.0 0.8

0.0 0.8

0.0 1.5

0.0 1.7

12.1 B

0.0 A

12.0 B

14.5 B

0.0 A

10.5 B

21.9 C

10.7 B

10.9 B

21.1 C

11.1 B

11.6 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
374

12.0 B
260

11.5 B
569

11.6 B
1099

12.1 B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

7.1 4.0

8.0 3.9

0.1 2

14.9 4.0

14.0 5.0
4 15.5

4.0 26.0

7.7 5

5.8 4.0

5.0 2.9

0.0 6

16.2 4.0

17.0 8.1
8 15.5

4.0 26.0

9.8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.0 2.1 3.9 1.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

11.9 B
Existing Year 2023 Synchro 11 Report
Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Date Palm Drive & 30th Avenue
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/27/2023
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
93 93
0 238
238
0 88
88 0
85 85
0 214
214
0 246
246
0 52
52 0
417
417
0 53
53 0
300
300
0 822
822
0 62
62 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00
No
1870
259

0.92 2
502

0.27 1870
259
1870

6.7 1.00
No
1870
233

0.92 2
492

0.26 1870
233
1870

6.0 1.00
No
1870
453

0.92 2
807

0.18 4590
334
1702

5.1 1.00
No
1870
893

0.92 2
1614

0.33 4845
627
1702

8.6 1870
101

0.92 2
129

0.07 1781
101
1781

3.2 1870
96 0.92
2 412

0.27 1536
96 1536

2.8 1870
92 0.92
2 119

0.07 1781
92 1781

2.9 1870
267

0.92 2
405

0.26 1541
267
1541

8.9 1870
57 0.92
2 1870
58 0.92
2 101

0.18 577
177
1763

5.3 1870
326

0.92 2
1870
67 0.92
2 121

0.33 362
333
1804

8.7 93 373

0.21 1781
326
1781

10.1 10.1

1.00 373

0.87 373

1.00 1.00

21.9 19.9

0.0 0.05
1781
57 1781

1.8 1.8

1.00 93

0.61 187

1.00 1.00

26.6 6.5
Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS

3.2 6.7 2.8 2.9 6.0 8.9 5.1 5.3 8.6 8.7

1.00 129

0.78 155

1.00 1.00

26.1 18.9

0.0 1.00
412

0.23 697

1.00 1.00

16.4 0.3

1.00 119

0.77 155

1.00 1.00

26.3 15.8

0.0 1.00
405

0.66 699

1.00 1.00

18.8 1.8

0.33 310

0.57 646

1.00 1.00

21.6 1.7

0.20 601

0.55 850

1.00 1.00

15.6 0.8
502

0.52 849

1.00 1.00

17.8 0.8
492

0.47 849

1.00 1.00

17.8 0.7
599

0.56 1247

1.00 1.00

21.6 0.8
1134

0.55 1604

1.00 1.00

15.6 0.4

0.0 2.5

0.0 0.9

0.0 2.3

0.0 2.8

0.0 0.8

0.0 1.8

0.0 2.0

0.0 2.6

0.0 1.9 1.6 5.5 2.8

45.1 D

18.6 B

16.6 B

42.1 D

18.5 B

20.7 C

33.1 C

22.4 C

23.3 C

41.8 D

16.0 B

16.4 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
456

24.1 C
592

23.1 C
568

23.7 C
1286

22.7 C
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s
1 16.0

4.0 2

14.1 4.0

21.0 7.3
3 7.8

4.0 5.0

4.9 0.0
4 19.4

4.0 26.0

8.7 5

7.0 4.0

6.0 3.8

0.0 6

23.1 4.0

27.0 10.7

5.0 7

8.2 4.0

5.0 5.2

0.0 8

19.1 4.0

26.0 10.9

0.0 2.4 1.5 1.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

23.2 C
Existing Year 2023 Synchro 11 Report
Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
4: Date Palm Drive & Tachevah Drive 05/27/2023
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
28 28
0 96
96 0
37 712 1043
37 712 1043
11 11
0 0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
0 0
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 0
-
0 0
-
-
-
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
97 2
29 97
2 99
97 2
97 2
97 2
97 2
38 734 1075 11
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
1451 543 1086 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1081
370
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 163 414 356
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 163

5.74 7.14 5.34

6.64 6.04
-
-
-
-

3.82 3.92 3.12
183 414 356
216
613
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 1
Stage 2
193
613
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s 24.8
EB NB

0.8 SB
0 HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
356

0.107

16.3 C
- 307 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 0.416
-
-
-

24.8 C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 2
Existing Year 2023 Synchro 11 Report
Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Date Palm Drive & McCallum Way
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/27/2023
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
82 82
0 111
111
0 72
72 0
70 70
0 127
127
0 47
47 0
83 83
0 882
882
0 63
63 0
49 49
0 643
643
0 43
43 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00 1.00
No
1870
123

0.90 2
281

0.27 1051
0 1.00
No
1870
141

0.90 2
348

0.27 1302
0 1.00
No
1870
980

0.90 2
1653

0.34 4863
685
1702

6.0 1.00
No
1870
714

0.90 2
1533

0.31 4879
497
1702

4.2 1870
91 0.90
2 413

0.27 1187
91 1187

2.4 1870
80 0.90
2 183

0.27 683
203
1734

3.5 1870
78 0.90
2 401

0.27 1177
78 1177

2.1 1870
52 0.90
2 128

0.27 480
193
1782

3.2 1870
92 0.90
2 149

0.08 1781
92 1781

1.8 1870
70 0.90
2 118

0.34 347
365
1806

6.0 1870
54 0.90
2 103

0.06 1781
54 1781

1.1 1870
48 0.90
2 102

0.31 326
265
1801

4.2 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0

0.0 5.6 3.5 5.6 0.0 3.2 1.8 6.0 6.0 1.1 4.2 4.2

1.00 413

0.22 956

1.00 1.00

13.1 0.3

0.39 464

0.44 1257

1.00 1.00

10.9 0.7

1.00 401

0.19 940

1.00 1.00

13.2 0.2

0.27 477

0.40 1292

1.00 1.00

10.8 0.6

1.00 149

0.62 348

1.00 1.00

15.9 4.1

0.19 614

0.59 856

1.00 1.00

9.8 0.9

0.0 1.5

1.00 103

0.52 248

1.00 1.00

16.4 4.0

0.18 566

0.47 754

1.00 1.00

9.9 0.6

0.0 1.1
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0

0.00 0

1.00 0.00

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0
1157

0.59 1614

1.00 1.00

9.8 0.5

0.0 1.4
1070

0.46 1424

1.00 1.00

9.9 0.3

0.0 1.0

0.0 0.6

0.0 0.0

0.0 1.1

0.0 0.5

0.0 1.1

0.0 0.7

0.0 0.4

13.4 B

0.0 A

11.5 B

13.5 B

0.0 A

11.3 B

20.0 B

10.3 B

10.7 B

20.4 C

10.2 B

10.5 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
294

12.1 B
271

12.0 B
1142

11.2 B
816

11.0 B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

6.1 4.0

5.0 3.1

0.0 2

16.2 4.0

17.0 8.0
4 13.6

4.0 26.0

7.6 5

7.0 4.0

7.0 3.8

0.0 6

15.3 4.0

15.0 6.2
8 13.6

4.0 26.0

7.6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.1 1.5 2.9 1.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

11.3 B
Existing Year 2023 Synchro 11 Report
Timing Plan: PM Peak
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Date Palm Drive & 30th Avenue
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/27/2023
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
83 83
0 126
126
0 86
86 0
41 41
0 219
219
0 259
259
0 147
147
0 808
808
0 35
35 0
154
154
0 559
559
0 94
94 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00 1.00
No
1870
140

0.90 2
499

0.27 1870
140
1870

3.2 1.00
No
1870
243

0.90 2
457

0.24 1870
243
1870

6.2 1.00
No
1870
898

0.90 2
1375

0.27 5016
609
1702

8.6 1.00
No
1870
621

0.90 2
1231

0.28 4411
477
1702

6.4 1870
92 0.90
2 123

0.07 1781
92 1781

2.8 1870
96 0.90
2 417

0.27 1562
96 1562

2.6 1870
46 0.90
2 1870
288

0.90 2
386

0.24 1583
288
1583

9.2 1870
163

0.90 2
205

0.12 1781
163
1781

4.9 1870
39 0.90
2 1870
171

0.90 2
214

0.12 1781
171
1781

5.1 1870
104

0.90 2
203

0.28 728
248
1735

6.6 82 60

0.05 1781
46 1781

1.4 0.27
217
328
1830

8.7 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)

2.8 3.2 2.6 1.4

1.00 82

0.56 163

1.00 1.00

25.5 5.9

6.2 9.2 4.9 8.6 8.7 5.1 6.4 6.6

1.00 123

0.75 163

1.00 1.00

25.0 12.6

0.0 1.00
417

0.23 743

1.00 1.00

15.6 0.3

1.00 386

0.75 753

1.00 1.00

19.1 2.9

1.00 205

0.79 228

1.00 1.00

23.6 16.0

0.0 0.12
501

0.65 703

1.00 1.00

17.6 1.5

1.00 214

0.80 228

1.00 1.00

23.4 17.0

0.0 0.42
484

0.51 666

1.00 1.00

16.6 0.8
499

0.28 890

1.00 1.00

15.9 0.3
457

0.53 890

1.00 1.00

18.0 1.0
933

0.65 1308

1.00 1.00

17.5 0.8
950

0.50 1308

1.00 1.00

16.5 0.4
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS

0.0 1.2

0.0 0.8

0.0 0.7

0.0 2.3

0.0 3.1

0.0 2.9

0.0 3.2

0.0 2.0

0.0 1.5 2.7 2.8 2.1

37.6 D

16.2 B

15.9 B

31.4 C

18.9 B

22.0 C

39.5 D

18.3 B

19.0 B

40.4 D

16.9 B

17.4 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
328

22.1 C
577

21.4 C
1100

21.7 C
896

21.5 C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

10.6 4.0

7.0 7.1
2 19.0

4.0 21.0

10.7 4.0
3 6.5

4.0 5.0

3.4 0.0
4 18.6

4.0 26.0

5.2 5

10.3 4.0

7.0 6.9
6 19.3

4.0 21.0

8.6 7

7.8 4.0

5.0 4.8

0.0 8

17.3 4.0

26.0 11.2

2.0 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.9 0.0 3.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

21.6 C
Existing Year 2023 Synchro 11 Report
Timing Plan: PM Peak
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
4: Date Palm Drive & Tachevah Drive 05/27/2023
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, # 0
23 23
0 57
57 0
78 1003 790
78 1003 790
48 48
0 0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
0 -
-
-
98 2
58 0
-
-
-
0 0
-
0 0
-
-
-
98 2
49 Grade, % 0
98 2
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
98 2
98 2
98 2
23 80 1023 806
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
1400 428 855 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
831
569
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 160 492 460
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 160

5.74 7.14 5.34

6.64 6.04
-
-
-
-

3.82 3.92 3.12
194 492 460
306
483
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 1
Stage 2
253
483
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s 20.9
EB NB
1 SB
0 HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
460

0.173

14.5 B
- 308 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 0.265
-
-
-

20.9 C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 1
Existing Year 2023 Synchro 11 Report
Timing Plan: PM Peak

APPENDIX D -
PROJECT COMPLETION YEAR 2025 CONDITIONS PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS

WORKSHEETS
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Date Palm Drive & McCallum Way
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
57 57
0 203
203
0 100
100
0 64
64 0
141
141
0 45
45 0
43 43
0 458
458
0 45
45 0
92 92
0 912
912
0 50
50 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00 1.00
No
1870
226

0.90 2
376

0.32 1177
0 1.00
No
1870
157

0.90 2
432

0.32 1354
0 1.00
No
1870
509

0.90 2
1383

0.29 4726
365
1702

3.4 1.00
No
1870
1013

0.90 2
1611

0.33 4942
697
1702

6.9 1870
63 0.90
2 451

0.32 1173
63 1173

1.7 1870
111

0.90 2
185

0.32 578
337
1756

6.4 1870
71 0.90
2 346

0.32 1042
71 1042

2.4 1870
50 0.90
2 138

0.32 431
207
1785

3.5 1870
48 0.90
2 1870
50 0.90
2 134

0.29 458
194
1780

3.4 1870
102

0.90 2
152

0.09 1781
102
1781

2.2 1870
56 0.90
2 92 89

0.05 1781
48 1781

1.0 1.0

1.00 92

0.52 225

1.00 1.00

18.3 4.5

0.33 273
372
1810

6.9 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0

0.0 5.3 6.4 8.8 0.0 3.5 3.4 3.4 2.2 6.9 6.9

1.00 451

0.14 847

1.00 1.00

12.4 0.1

0.33 560

0.60 1152

1.00 1.00

11.4 1.0

1.00 346

0.21 697

1.00 1.00

15.1 0.3

0.24 570

0.36 1172

1.00 1.00

10.4 0.4

0.26 521

0.37 629

1.00 1.00

11.1 0.4

1.00 152

0.67 360

1.00 1.00

17.6 5.1

0.15 590

0.63 777

1.00 1.00

11.3 1.1
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0

0.00 0

1.00 0.00

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0
996

0.37 1203

1.00 1.00

11.1 0.2
1110

0.63 1461

1.00 1.00

11.3 0.6

0.0 0.4

0.0 0.0

0.0 2.2

0.0 0.5

0.0 1.2

0.0 0.5

0.0 0.9

0.0 1.0

0.0 0.9

0.0 1.8

0.0 2.0

12.6 B

0.0 A

12.4 B

15.4 B

0.0 A

10.8 B

22.8 C

11.3 B

11.6 B

22.7 C

11.9 B

12.4 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
400

12.4 B
278

11.9 B
607

12.3 B
1171

13.0 B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

7.4 4.0

8.0 4.2

0.1 2

15.6 4.0

14.0 5.4
4 16.6

4.0 26.0

8.4 5

6.1 4.0

5.0 3.0

0.0 6

16.9 4.0

17.0 8.9
8 16.6

4.0 26.0

10.8 1.3
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.1 2.3 3.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

12.6 B
Project Completion Year 2025
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Date Palm Drive & 30th Avenue
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
99 99
0 253
253
0 95
95 0
91 91
0 228
228
0 261
261
0 57
57 0
444
444
0 58
58 0
319
319
0 875
875
0 66
66 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00
No
1870
275

0.92 2
506

0.27 1870
275
1870

7.9 1.00
No
1870
248

0.92 2
494

0.26 1870
248
1870

7.1 1.00
No
1870
483

0.92 2
814

0.18 4578
357
1702

6.1 1.00
No
1870
951

0.92 2
1705

0.35 4842
668
1870
108

0.92 2
138

0.08 1781
108
1781

3.8 1870
103

0.92 2
415

0.27 1536
103
1536

3.3 1870
99 0.92
2 127

0.07 1781
99 1781

3.4 1870
284

0.92 2
1870
62 0.92
2 1870
63 0.92
2 104

0.18 587
189
1761

6.2 1870
347

0.92 2
1870
72 0.92
2 407

0.26 1541
284
1541

10.5 10.5

1.00 407

0.70 635

1.00 1.00

20.9 2.2
94 404

0.23 1781
347
1781

11.8 11.8

1.00 404

0.86 565

1.00 1.00

23.4 9.3
129

0.35 366
355
1803

10.0 10.0

0.20 635

0.56 972

1.00 1.00

16.5 0.8

0.05 1781
62 1781

2.2 2.2

1.00 94

0.66 226

1.00 1.00

29.3 7.8
Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
1702

10.0 3.8 7.9 3.3 3.4 7.1 6.1 6.2 10.0

1.00 138

0.78 169

1.00 1.00

28.6 17.1

0.0 1.00
415

0.25 633

1.00 1.00

18.0 0.3

1.00 127

0.78 169

1.00 1.00

28.8 15.2

0.0 0.33
313

0.60 614

1.00 1.00

23.9 1.9
506

0.54 771

1.00 1.00

19.7 0.9
494

0.50 771

1.00 1.00

19.7 0.8
606

0.59 1187

1.00 1.00

23.8 0.9
1199

0.56 1835

1.00 1.00

16.5 0.4

0.0 3.1

0.0 1.1

0.0 2.8

0.0 3.5

0.0 1.0

0.0 2.2

0.0 2.5

0.0 5.2

0.0 3.1

0.0 2.1 1.9 3.4

45.7 D

20.6 C

18.3 B

44.0 D

20.5 C

23.1 C

37.1 D

24.7 C

25.7 C

32.7 C

16.9 B

17.3 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
486

25.7 C
631

25.4 C
608

26.3 C
1370

21.0 C
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s
1 18.3

4.0 2

15.2 4.0

22.0 8.2
3 8.5

4.0 6.0

5.4 0.0
4 21.1

4.0 26.0

9.9 5

7.3 4.0

8.0 4.2

0.0 6

26.2 4.0

34.0 12.0

6.0 7

8.9 4.0

6.0 5.8

0.0 8

20.7 4.0

26.0 12.5

0.5 2.6 1.6 1.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

23.7 C
Project Completion Year 2025
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
4: Date Palm Drive & Tachevah Drive 05/28/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, # 0
30 102
30 102
40 757 1108
40 757 1108
12 12
0 0 0 0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
0 -
-
250 -
0 0
-
0 0
-
-
-
97 2
12 -
Grade, % 0 -
97 2
-
97 2
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
97 2
97 2
97 2
31 105 41 780 1142
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
1542 577 1154 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1148
394
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 144 394 330
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 144

5.74 7.14 5.34

6.64 6.04
-
-
-
-

3.82 3.92 3.12
164 394 330
196
595
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 1
Stage 2
172
595
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s

HCM LOS
EB
29 D
NB

0.9 SB
0 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
330

0.125

17.5 C
- 283 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 0.481
-
-
-
29 D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 2.5
Project Completion Year 2025
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
5: Date Palm Drive & Project Driveway 05/28/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, # 0
0 0
0 2
2 0
556
556
0 2
2 0
0 1053
0 1053
0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
- 0
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
0 Grade, % 0
92 2
-
92 2
0 92
2 -
92 2
-
92 2
0 92
2 Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow 0 2 604 2 0 1145
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 303 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1

7.14 -
-

3.92 591
-
Stage 2 -
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
591 -
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s 11.1
WB NB
0 SB
0 HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBT NBRWBLn1 SBT
-
-
-
-
-
- 591 -
-
-
-
-
- 0.004
-
-
-

11.1 B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0
Project Completion Year 2025
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
6: San Vicente Avenue/Existing Driveway & McCallum Way 05/28/2024 Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
2 2
0 337
337
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 248
248
0 2
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
-
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
92 2
2 92
2 366
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
270
92 2
2 92
2 0
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
1 92
2 0
92 2
1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
272 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
366 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
642 642 366 641 641 271
-
-
-
-
370 370
272 272
-
-
271 271
370 370
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy

4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22
-
-
-
-

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
-

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
- - -

2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1291 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1193 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
387 392 679 388 393 768
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1291
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
650 620
734 685
-
-
735 685
650 620
-
-
1193 386 391 679 387 392 768
-
-
-
-
-
-
386 391
649 619
733 685
-
-
-
387 392
734 685
649 619
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s

HCM LOS
EB
0 WB
0 NB
0 A
SB
12 B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
- 1291 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
1193 -
-
-
-
-
- 515
- 0.002 -
0 A
0 - 0.004
0 A
-

7.8 A
0 A
-
-
-
-
12 B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0
Project Completion Year 2025
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Date Palm Drive & McCallum Way
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
88 88
0 118
118
0 77
77 0
76 76
0 136
136
0 50
50 0
89 89
0 937
937
0 67
67 0
55 55
0 683
683
0 46
46 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00 1.00
No
1870
131

0.90 2
290

0.28 1047
0 1.00
No
1870
151

0.90 2
361

0.28 1300
0 1.00
No
1870
1041

0.90 2
1665

0.34 4865
728
1702

6.8 1.00
No
1870
759

0.90 2
1558

0.32 4879
528
1702

4.7 1870
98 0.90
2 405

0.28 1173
98 1173

2.8 1870
86 0.90
2 191

0.28 687
217
1734

3.9 1870
84 0.90
2 393

0.28 1162
84 1162

2.4 1870
56 0.90
2 134

0.28 482
207
1782

3.6 1870
99 0.90
2 152

0.09 1781
99 1781

2.0 1870
74 0.90
2 118

0.34 345
387
1806

6.8 1870
61 0.90
2 111

0.06 1781
61 1781

1.3 1870
51 0.90
2 104

0.32 326
282
1801

4.8 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0

0.0 6.4 3.9 6.3 0.0 3.6 2.0 6.8 6.8 1.3 4.7 4.8

1.00 405

0.24 886

1.00 1.00

13.8 0.3

0.40 481

0.45 1193

1.00 1.00

11.3 0.7

1.00 393

0.21 870

1.00 1.00

13.9 0.3

0.27 494

0.42 1227

1.00 1.00

11.2 0.6

1.00 152

0.65 377

1.00 1.00

16.7 4.6

0.19 618

0.63 813

1.00 1.00

10.4 1.0

1.00 111

0.55 236

1.00 1.00

17.2 4.1

0.18 575

0.49 668

1.00 1.00

10.4 0.6
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0

0.00 0

1.00 0.00

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0
1165

0.62 1532

1.00 1.00

10.4 0.6
1087

0.49 1262

1.00 1.00

10.4 0.3

0.0 0.7

0.0 0.0

0.0 1.3

0.0 0.6

0.0 1.2

0.0 0.8

0.0 1.6

0.0 1.8

0.0 0.5

0.0 1.2

0.0 1.3

14.1 B

0.0 A

11.9 B

14.2 B

0.0 A

11.7 B

21.3 C

10.9 B

11.4 B

21.3 C

10.7 B

11.0 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
315

12.6 B
291

12.4 B
1214

12.0 B
871

11.5 B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

6.4 4.0

5.0 3.3

0.0 2

16.9 4.0

17.0 8.8
4 14.5

4.0 26.0

8.4 5

7.2 4.0

8.0 4.0

0.1 6

16.1 4.0

14.0 6.8
8 14.5

4.0 26.0

8.3 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.1 1.6 2.8 1.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

11.9 B
Project Completion Year 2025
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Date Palm Drive & 30th Avenue
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
89 89
0 134
134
0 93
93 0
44 44
0 233
233
0 275
275
0 157
157
0 860
860
0 40
40 0
164
164
0 596
596
0 100
100
0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00 1.00
No
1870
149

0.90 2
517

0.28 1870
149
1870

3.6 1.00
No
1870
259

0.90 2
472

0.25 1870
259
1870

6.9 1.00
No
1870
956

0.90 2
1393

0.28 5002
650
1702

9.8 1.00
No
1870
662

0.90 2
1228

0.28 4408
509
1702

7.3 1870
99 0.90
2 127

0.07 1781
99 1781

3.2 1870
103

0.90 2
432

0.28 1562
103
1562

3.0 1870
49 0.90
2 1870
306

0.90 2
1870
174

0.90 2
216

0.12 1781
174
1781

5.5 1870
44 0.90
2 1870
182

0.90 2
216

0.12 1781
182
1781

5.8 1870
111

0.90 2
203

0.28 730
264
1734

7.5 84 400

0.25 1583
306
1583

10.3 10.3

1.00 400

0.77 712

1.00 1.00

20.0 3.1
64 0.05
1781
49 1781

1.6 1.6

1.00 84

0.58 154

1.00 1.00

27.0 6.3

0.28 230
350
1828

9.9 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS

3.2 3.6 3.0 6.9 5.5 9.8 9.9 5.8 7.3 7.5

1.00 127

0.78 154

1.00 1.00

26.4 18.8

0.0 1.00
432

0.24 703

1.00 1.00

16.2 0.3

1.00 216

0.81 216

1.00 1.00

24.7 19.7

0.0 0.13
509

0.69 664

1.00 1.00

18.6 2.0

1.00 216

0.84 216

1.00 1.00

24.9 25.0

0.0 0.42
483

0.55 630

1.00 1.00

17.7 1.0
517

0.29 842

1.00 1.00

16.4 0.3
472

0.55 842

1.00 1.00

18.7 1.0
948

0.69 1237

1.00 1.00

18.6 1.1
948

0.54 1237

1.00 1.00

17.7 0.5

0.0 1.4

0.0 0.9

0.0 0.7

0.0 2.7

0.0 3.5

0.0 3.4

0.0 3.7

0.0 2.3

0.0 1.9 3.2 3.5 2.5

45.2 D

16.7 B

16.5 B

33.3 C

19.7 B

23.1 C

44.4 D

19.6 B

20.6 C

49.9 D

18.2 B

18.7 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
351

24.7 C
614

22.5 C
1174

23.6 C
955

24.3 C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

11.0 4.0

7.0 7.8
2 20.1

4.0 21.0

11.9 4.0
3 6.7

4.0 5.0

3.6 0.0
4 20.0

4.0 26.0

5.6 5

11.0 4.0

7.0 7.5
6 20.1

4.0 21.0

9.5 7

8.1 4.0

5.0 5.2

0.0 8

18.6 4.0

26.0 12.3

2.0 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

23.7 C
Project Completion Year 2025
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
4: Date Palm Drive & Tachevah Drive 05/28/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, # 0
25 25
0 61
61 0
83 1066 840
83 1066 840
51 51
0 0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
0 -
-
-
98 2
62 250 -
0 0
-
0 0
-
-
-
98 2
52 -
Grade, % 0 -
98 2
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
98 2
98 2
98 2
26 85 1088 857
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
1488 455 909 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
883
605
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 141 472 433
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 141

5.74 7.14 5.34

6.64 6.04
-
-
-
-

3.82 3.92 3.12
175 472 433
285
463
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 1
Stage 2
229
463
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s 23.5
EB NB

1.1 SB
0 HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
433

0.196

15.3 C
- 281 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 0.312
-
-
-

23.5 C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 1.3
Project Completion Year 2025
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
5: Date Palm Drive & Project Driveway 05/28/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, # 0
0 0
0 5 1073
5 1073
2 2
0 0
0 0
783
783
0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
- 0
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
0 Grade, % 0
90 2
-
90 2
0 90
2 -
90 2
-
90 2
0 90
2 Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow 0 6 1192 2 0 870
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 597 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1

7.14 -
-

3.92 382
-
Stage 2 -
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
382 -
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s 14.6
WB NB
0 SB
0 HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBT NBRWBLn1 SBT
-
-
-
-
-
- 382 -
-
-
-
-
- 0.015
-
-
-

14.6 B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0
Project Completion Year 2025
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
6: San Vicente Avenue/Existing Driveway & McCallum Way 05/28/2024 Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
3 3
0 237
237
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 259
259
0 3
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
0 0
0 2
2 0
Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
-
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
92 2
3 92
2 258
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
282
92 2
3 92
2 0
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
1 92
2 0
92 2
2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
285 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
258 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
549 549 258 548 548 284
-
-
-
-
264 264
285 285
-
-
284 284
264 264
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy

4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22
-
-
-
-

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
-

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
- - -

2.218 - 2.218
- 1307
-
-
-
- 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1277 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
446 443 781 447 444 755
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1277
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
741 690
722 676
-
-
723 676
741 690
-
-
- 1307 444 442 781 446 443 755
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
444 442
739 688
720 676
-
-
-
446 443
721 676
739 688
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s

HCM LOS
EB

0.1 WB
0 NB
0 A
SB

10.9 B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
- 1277
- 0.003
-
-
- 1307 -
-
-
-
-
- 613
-
-
-
-
-
0 A
0 - 0.005
0 A
-

7.8 A
0 0
A
-
-
-
-

10.9 B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0
Project Completion Year 2025
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report

APPENDIX E -
PROJECT COMPLETION YEAR 2027 CONDITIONS PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS

WORKSHEETS
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Date Palm Drive & McCallum Way
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
59 59
0 228
228
0 106
106
0 67
67 0
157
157
0 48
48 0
46 46
0 503
503
0 48
48 0
95 95
0 979
979
0 53
53 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00 1.00
No
1870
253

0.90 2
403

0.34 1200
0 1.00
No
1870
174

0.90 2
460

0.34 1370
0 1.00
No
1870
559

0.90 2
1403

0.30 4743
399
1702

4.0 1.00
No
1870
1088

0.90 2
1616

0.33 4947
748
1702

8.0 1870
66 0.90
2 446

0.34 1152
66 1152

2.0 1870
118

0.90 2
188

0.34 560
371
1759

7.5 1870
74 0.90
2 330

0.34 1010
74 1010

2.8 10.3

1.00 330

0.22 614

1.00 1.00

16.1 0.3
1870
53 0.90
2 140

0.34 417
227
1788

4.1 1870
51 0.90
2 1870
53 0.90
2 131

0.30 445
213
1783

4.0 1870
106

0.90 2
150

0.08 1781
106
1781

2.4 1870
59 0.90
2 95 88

0.05 1781
51 1781

1.2 1.2

1.00 95

0.54 211

1.00 1.00

19.5 4.6

0.33 268
399
1811

8.0 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0

0.0 6.0 7.5 0.0 4.1 4.0 4.0 2.4 8.0 8.0

1.00 446

0.15 769

1.00 1.00

13.0 0.2

0.32 590

0.63 1084

1.00 1.00

11.8 1.1

0.23 600

0.38 1101

1.00 1.00

10.7 0.4

0.25 527

0.40 592

1.00 1.00

11.9 0.5

1.00 150

0.71 338

1.00 1.00

18.8 6.0

0.15 592

0.67 730

1.00 1.00

12.3 1.8
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0

0.00 0

1.00 0.00

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0
1007

0.40 1129

1.00 1.00

11.9 0.3
1112

0.67 1371

1.00 1.00

12.3 1.0

0.0 0.5

0.0 0.0

0.0 2.6

0.0 0.6

0.0 1.4

0.0 0.5

0.0 1.1

0.0 1.2

0.0 1.1

0.0 2.2

0.0 2.5

13.1 B

0.0 A

12.9 B

16.5 B

0.0 A

11.1 B

24.1 C

12.1 B

12.4 B

24.8 C

13.2 B

14.1 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
437

12.9 B
301

12.4 B
663

13.1 B
1253

14.5 B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

7.6 4.0

8.0 4.4

0.1 2

16.5 4.0

14.0 6.0
4 18.2

4.0 26.0

9.5 5

6.2 4.0

5.0 3.2

0.0 6

17.8 4.0

17.0 10.0

3.7 8

18.2 4.0

26.0 12.3

1.4 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.2 2.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

13.6 B
Project Completion Year 2027
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Date Palm Drive & Rosemount Road
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
50 50
0 220
220
0 578
578
0 41
41 0
162
162
0 1010
1010
0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00
No
1870
54 0.92
2 378

0.21 1781
54 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
No
1870
628

0.92 2
1321

0.27 5034
438
1702

3.3 1.00
No
1870
1098

0.92 2
2698

0.53 5274
1098
1702

4.0 1870
239

0.92 2
337

0.21 1585
239
1585

4.3 1870
45 0.92
2 1870
176

0.92 2
227

0.13 1781
176
1781

3.0 94

0.27 346
235
1808

3.4 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
1781

0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)

0.8 4.3 3.3 3.4 3.0 4.0

1.00 378

0.14 1212

1.00 1.00

9.9 0.2

0.0 0.2

1.00 337

0.71 1078

1.00 1.00

11.3 2.8

0.19 491

0.48 879

1.00 1.00

9.4 0.7

0.0 1.0

1.00 227

0.78 404

1.00 1.00

13.0 5.6
924

0.47 1654

1.00 1.00

9.4 0.4

0.0 0.9
2698

0.41 4301

1.00 1.00

4.4 0.1

0.0 0.6
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS

0.0 1.3

0.0 1.3

10.0 B

14.0 B

9.8 A

10.1 B

18.7 B

4.5 A
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
293

13.3 B
673

9.9 A
1274

6.4 A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

7.9 4.0

7.0 5.0

0.1 2

12.4 4.0

15.0 5.4
6 20.3

4.0 26.0

6.0 8

10.6 4.0

21.0 6.3
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.0 8.0 0.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

8.4 A
Project Completion Year 2027
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Date Palm Drive & 30th Avenue
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
105
105
0 268
268
0 119
119
0 65
65 0
143
143
0 167
167
0 169
169
0 600
600
0 29
29 0
233
233
0 1062
1062
0 70
70 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00
No
1870
291

0.92 2
452

0.24 1870
291
1870

8.6 1.00
No
1870
155

0.92 2
407

0.22 1870
155
1870

4.4 1.00
No
1870
652

0.92 2
1363

0.27 4986
444
1702

6.7 1.00
No
1870
1154

0.92 2
1534

0.31 4893
803
1702

13.1 13.1
1870
114

0.92 2
144

0.08 1781
114
1781

3.9 1870
129

0.92 2
371

0.24 1533
129
1533

4.3 1870
71 0.92
2 102

0.06 1781
71 1781

2.4 1870
182

0.92 2
334

0.22 1536
182
1536

6.5 1870
184

0.92 2
229

0.13 1781
184
1781

6.2 1870
32 0.92
2 1870
253

0.92 2
300

0.17 1781
253
1781

8.5 1870
76 0.92
2 67 101

0.31 322
427
1811

13.1 13.1

0.18 568

0.75 675

1.00 1.00

19.0 4.0

0.27 244
240
1825

6.8 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS

3.9 8.6 4.3 2.4 4.4 6.5 6.2 6.7 6.8 8.5

1.00 144

0.79 144

1.00 1.00

27.8 24.9

0.0 1.00
371

0.35 646

1.00 1.00

19.4 0.6

1.00 102

0.70 144

1.00 1.00

28.6 8.4

1.00 334

0.54 647

1.00 1.00

21.4 1.4

1.00 229

0.80 289

1.00 1.00

26.1 12.2

0.0 0.13
499

0.48 651

1.00 1.00

18.7 0.7

1.00 300

0.84 318

1.00 1.00

24.9 17.6

0.0 452

0.64 788

1.00 1.00

21.0 1.5
407

0.38 788

1.00 1.00

20.6 0.6
931

0.48 1214

1.00 1.00

18.7 0.4
1067

0.75 1269

1.00 1.00

19.0 2.1

0.0 3.4

0.0 1.4

0.0 1.2

0.0 1.7

0.0 2.2

0.0 2.3

0.0 2.6

0.0 4.4

0.0 2.5 3.1 4.5 5.0

52.7 D

22.5 C

19.9 B

36.9 D

21.2 C

22.8 C

38.4 D

19.1 B

19.5 B

42.4 D

21.2 C

23.0 C
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
534

28.3 C
408

24.6 C
868

23.3 C
1483

25.3 C
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s
1 14.4

4.0 2

20.9 4.0

22.0 8.8
3 7.5

4.0 5.0

4.4 0.0
4 18.9

4.0 26.0

10.6 1.7
5 11.9

4.0 10.0

8.2 6

23.3 4.0

23.0 15.1

4.2 7

9.0 4.0

5.0 5.9

0.0 8

17.4 4.0

26.0 8.5

0.0 3.3 0.1 1.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

25.2 C
Project Completion Year 2027
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
4: Date Palm Drive & Tachevah Drive 05/28/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
32 115
32 115
46 814 1193
46 814 1193
13 13
0 0 0 0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
0 0
0 -
-
-
250 -
0 0
-
0 0
-
-
-
-
-
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
97 2
33 119
97 2
97 2
97 2
97 2
97 2
47 839 1230 13
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
1667 622 1243 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1237
430
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 119 368 298
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 119

5.74 7.14 5.34

6.64 6.04
-
-
-
-

3.82 3.92 3.12
141 368 298
173
570
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 1
Stage 2
146
570
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s 38.4
EB NB
1 SB
0 HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
298

0.159

19.4 C
- 253 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 0.599
-
-
-

38.4 E
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 3.5
Project Completion Year 2027
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
5: Date Palm Drive & Project Driveway 05/28/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
0 0
0 23 596
23 596
13 13
0 0
0 0
1127
1127
0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
-
0 0
0 -
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 - 0 0
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
92 2
0 92
2 25 648
92 2
92 2
14 92
2 0
92 2
1225
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 331 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1

7.14 -
-

3.92 567
-
Stage 2 -
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
567 -
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s 11.6
WB NB
0 SB
0 HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBT NBRWBLn1 SBT
-
-
-
-
-
- 567 -
-
-
-
-
- 0.044
-
-
-

11.6 B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1
Project Completion Year 2027
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
6: San Vicente Avenue/Existing Driveway & McCallum Way 05/28/2024 Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
13 357
13 357
0 0
0 0
0 0
263
263
0 6
6 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 4
4 0
0 0
0 8
8 0 0 0
Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
-
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
92 2
14 388
92 2
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
286
92 2
7 92
2 0
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
4 92
2 0
92 2
9 Major/Minor
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
Major1
293
Major2 Minor1 Minor2
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
388 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
710 709 388 706 706 290
416 416
294 293

7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
-
-
-
-
-
290 290
416 416
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy

4.12 4.12
-
-
-
-
-
-

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
- - -

2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1269 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1170 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
348 359 660 351 361 749
614 592
714 670
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1269
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
718 672
614 592
-
-
1170 340 354 660 347 356 749
-
-
-
-
-
-
340 354
605 584
706 670
-
-
-
347 356
708 672
605 584
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s

HCM LOS
EB

0.3 WB
0 NB
0 A
SB

11.8 B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
- 1269 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
1170 -
-
-
-
-
- 540
- 0.011 -
0 A
0 - 0.024
0 A
-

7.9 A
0 A
-
-
-
-

11.8 B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1
Project Completion Year 2027
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Date Palm Drive & McCallum Way
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
93 93
0 141
141
0 82
82 0
79 79
0 161
161
0 53
53 0
94 94
0 1017
1017
0 71
71 0
56 56
0 751
751
0 49
49 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00 1.00
No
1870
157

0.90 2
325

0.29 1104
0 1.00
No
1870
179

0.90 2
397

0.29 1345
0 1.00
No
1870
1130

0.90 2
1683

0.35 4871
789
1702

8.0 1.00
No
1870
834

0.90 2
1576

0.32 4892
579
1702

5.6 1870
103

0.90 2
391

0.29 1140
103
1140

3.3 1870
91 0.90
2 189

0.29 640
248
1743

4.7 1870
88 0.90
2 380

0.29 1130
88 1130

2.8 1870
59 0.90
2 131

0.29 443
238
1789

4.4 1870
104

0.90 2
152

0.09 1781
104
1781

2.3 1870
79 0.90
2 118

0.35 340
420
1807

8.0 1870
62 0.90
2 111

0.06 1781
62 1781

1.4 1870
54 0.90
2 102

0.32 316
309
1804

5.6 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0

0.0 7.6 4.7 7.5 0.0 4.4 2.3 8.0 8.0 1.4 5.6 5.6

1.00 391

0.26 791

1.00 1.00

14.7 0.4

0.37 514

0.48 1124

1.00 1.00

11.7 0.7

1.00 380

0.23 775

1.00 1.00

14.8 0.3

0.25 527

0.45 1154

1.00 1.00

11.6 0.6

1.00 152

0.68 265

1.00 1.00

17.9 5.3

0.19 624

0.67 762

1.00 1.00

11.2 1.7

1.00 111

0.56 221

1.00 1.00

18.4 4.4

0.17 581

0.53 716

1.00 1.00

11.2 0.8
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0

0.00 0

1.00 0.00

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0
1176

0.67 1436

1.00 1.00

11.2 0.9
1097

0.53 1351

1.00 1.00

11.2 0.4

0.0 0.8

0.0 0.0

0.0 1.6

0.0 0.7

0.0 1.5

0.0 1.0

0.0 2.1

0.0 2.4

0.0 0.6

0.0 1.5

0.0 1.6

15.0 B

0.0 A

12.4 B

15.1 B

0.0 A

12.2 B

23.3 C

12.2 B

13.0 B

22.8 C

11.6 B

11.9 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
351

13.2 B
326

13.0 B
1313

13.3 B
950

12.4 B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

6.5 4.0

5.0 3.4

0.0 2

17.9 4.0

17.0 10.0

3.9 4

15.9 4.0

26.0 9.6
5 7.4

4.0 6.0

4.3 0.0
6 17.0

4.0 16.0

7.6 8

15.9 4.0

26.0 9.5
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.8 3.3 1.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

13.0 B
Project Completion Year 2027
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Date Palm Drive & Rosemount Road
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
73 73
0 302
302
0 1163
1163
0 42
42 0
262
262
0 686
686
0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00
No
1870
79 0.92
2 451

0.25 1781
79 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
No
1870
1264

0.92 2
1605

0.32 5226
851
1702

11.4 11.4

1.00 No
1870
746

0.92 2
3000

0.59 5274
746
1702

3.5 1870
328

0.92 2
402

0.25 1585
328
1585

9.8 1870
46 0.92
2 1870
285

0.92 2
340

0.19 1781
285
1781

7.8 58

0.32 184
459
1837

11.4 11.4

0.10 583

0.79 621

1.00 1.00

15.6 6.4
Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
1781

1.7 1.7 9.8 7.8 3.5

1.00 451

0.18 744

1.00 1.00

14.7 0.2

1.00 402

0.82 662

1.00 1.00

17.7 4.1

1.00 340

0.84 354

1.00 1.00

19.6 15.7

0.0 1080

0.79 1151

1.00 1.00

15.6 3.5
3000

0.25 3147

1.00 1.00

5.0 0.0

0.0 0.8

0.0 0.6

0.0 3.6

0.0 4.3

0.0 5.1 4.3

14.9 B

21.8 C

19.2 B

22.0 C

35.3 D

5.1 A
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
407

20.4 C
1310

20.1 C
1031

13.4 B
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
1 13.6

4.0 2

20.0 4.0
6 33.6

4.0 8

16.7 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 17.0

13.4 2.5

31.0 5.5

5.6 21.0

11.8 1.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s

9.8 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

17.7 B
Project Completion Year 2027
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Date Palm Drive & 30th Avenue
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
94 94
0 142
142
0 121
121
0 25
25 0
132
132
0 148
148
0 308
308
0 1098
1098
0 21
21 0
32 32
0 812
812
0 106
106
0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00 1.00
No
1870
158

0.90 2
371

0.20 1870
158
1870

4.5 1.00
No
1870
147

0.90 2
289

0.15 1870
147
1870

4.4 1.00
No
1870
1220

0.90 2
2416

0.47 5159
805
1702

9.9 1.00
No
1870
902

0.90 2
1278

0.28 4568
671
1870
104

0.90 2
133

0.07 1781
104
1781

3.5 1870
134

0.90 2
309

0.20 1560
134
1560

4.5 1870
28 0.90
2 1870
164

0.90 2
244

0.15 1582
164
1582

5.9 1870
342

0.90 2
1870
23 0.90
2 46

0.47 97
438
1852

9.9 1870
36 0.90
2 1870
118

0.90 2
55 403

0.23 1781
342
1781

11.1 11.1

1.00 403

0.85 590

1.00 1.00

22.4 7.7
67 167

0.28 595
349
1759

10.8 10.8

0.34 492

0.71 641

1.00 1.00

19.5 2.5

0.03 1781
28 1781

0.9 0.9

1.00 55

0.51 148

1.00 1.00

28.8 7.0

0.04 1781
36 1781

1.2 1.2

1.00 67

0.54 177

1.00 1.00

28.5 6.6
Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
1702

10.7 3.5 4.5 4.5 4.4 5.9 9.9 9.9 10.7

1.00 133

0.78 177

1.00 1.00

27.4 14.7

0.0 1.00
309

0.43 698

1.00 1.00

21.2 1.0

1.00 244

0.67 681

1.00 1.00

24.1 3.2

0.05 867

0.51 1105

1.00 1.00

11.2 0.5
371

0.43 836

1.00 1.00

21.2 0.8
289

0.51 805

1.00 1.00

23.4 1.4
1594

0.50 2030

1.00 1.00

11.2 0.2
952

0.70 1240

1.00 1.00

19.5 1.3

0.0 1.8

0.0 1.5

0.0 0.5

0.0 1.8

0.0 2.2

0.0 4.9

0.0 2.9

0.0 3.2

0.0 0.6

0.0 3.5

0.0 1.9 3.8

42.2 D

22.0 C

22.2 C

35.8 D

24.8 C

27.3 C

30.1 C

11.4 B

11.6 B

35.1 D

20.8 C

22.0 C
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
396

27.4 C
339

26.9 C
1585

15.5 B
1056

21.7 C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

6.3 4.0

6.0 3.2

0.0 2

32.3 4.0

36.0 11.9

8.3 3

5.9 4.0

5.0 2.9

0.0 4

16.0 4.0

27.0 6.5
5 17.6

4.0 20.0

13.1 0.6
6 20.9

4.0 22.0

12.8 3.9
7 8.5

4.0 6.0

5.5 0.0
8 13.3

4.0 26.0

7.9 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

20.0 B
Project Completion Year 2027
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
4: Date Palm Drive & Tachevah Drive 05/28/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, # 0
26 26
0 73
73 0
97 1156 914
97 1156 914
55 55
0 0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
0 -
-
-
98 2
74 250 -
0 0
-
0 0
-
-
-
98 2
56 -
Grade, % 0 -
98 2
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
98 2
98 2
98 2
27 99 1180 933
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
1631 495 989 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
961
670
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 110 445 396
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 110

5.74 7.14 5.34

6.64 6.04
-
-
-
-

3.82 3.92 3.12
147 445 396
255
428
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 1
Stage 2
191
428
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s 29.3
EB NB

1.3 SB
0 HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
396

0.25 17.1
C
- 247 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 0.409
-
-
-

29.3 D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 1.9
Project Completion Year 2027
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
5: Date Palm Drive & Project Driveway 05/28/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, # 0
0 0
0 87 1146
87 1146
27 27
0 0
0 0
855
855
0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
- 0
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
0 Grade, % 0
90 2
-
90 2
0 90
2 -
90 2
-
90 2
0 90
2 Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow 0 97 1273 30 0 950
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 652 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1

7.14 -
-

3.92 352
-
Stage 2 -
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
352 -
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s 19.1
WB NB
0 SB
0 HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBT NBRWBLn1 SBT
-
-
-
-
-
- 352 -
-
-
-
-
- 0.275
-
-
-

19.1 C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1
Project Completion Year 2027
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
6: San Vicente Avenue/Existing Driveway & McCallum Way 05/28/2024 Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
27 251
27 251
0 0
0 0
0 0
275
275
0 13
13 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 14
14 0
0 0
0 29
29 0 0 0
Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
-
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
92 2
29 273
92 2
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
299
92 2
14 92
2 0
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
15 92
2 0
92 2
32 Major/Minor
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
Major1
313
Major2 Minor1 Minor2
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
273 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
653 644 273 637 637 306
331 331
322 313

7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
-
-
-
-
-
306 306
331 331
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy

4.12 4.12
-
-
-
-
-
-

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
- - -

2.218 - 2.218
- 1290
- 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1247 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
380 391 766 390 395 734
682 645
690 657
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1247
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
704 662
682 645
-
-
- 1290 356 380 766 382 384 734
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
356 380
664 628
660 657
-
-
-
382 384
685 662
664 628
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s

HCM LOS
EB

0.8 WB
0 NB
0 A
SB

11.9 B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
- 1247
- 0.024
-
-
- 1290 -
-
-
-
-
- 565
-
-
-
-
-
0 A
0 - 0.083
0 A
-
8 A

0.1 0
A
-
-
-
-

11.9 B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3
Project Completion Year 2027
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report

APPENDIX F -

CUMULATIVE PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT
1 PROJECT SITE
3 5
4 6
1 7 See Cathedral Cove Center TA Excerpts below LEGEND # Cumulative Project Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
Cumulative Project Locations
Figure 6-1
10%
2 5% 5%
20%
10%
1 3 30%

PROJECT SITE
5 4
10%
30%
LEGEND # Intersection Project Driveway Roadway Segment
Kroger Gas Station
5 Project Study Area and Trip Distribution
Figure 1-2
LEGEND
(AM/PM) Peak Hour Volumes
Kroger Gas Station
Project Intersection Volumes
Figure 1-3
6 PROJECT SITE 35%
3 35%
20%
80%
55%
15%
2 25%
40%
1 40%
LEGEND # Intersection
The Wren Project
Project Study Area and Trip Distribution
Attachment 2
Wren Project
Trip Assignment
5%
5%
4 PROJECT SITE 25% 5% 5% 3
20%
20%
65% 2 20%
5%
15%
25%
10% 1
5%
5%
LEGEND # Intersection
Vallarta Shopping Center
Trip Assignment
Vallarta Shopping Center
Trip Assignment

MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES
______________________________________________________________________________________ TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Exhibit 4-2 shows the forecast trip percent distribution of the proposed project within the study area and the trip assignment percentages for each intersection movement.

EXHIBIT 4-2: PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT

PERCENTAGES

Page 21 ends

MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES
______________________________________________________________________________________ TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Exhibit 4-3 shows the corresponding forecast assignment of the AM Peak Hour and PM Peak Hour projectgenerated trips assuming the trip percent distribution shown in Exhibit 4-2.

EXHIBIT 4-3: PROJECT TRAFFIC PEAK HOUR TRIP ASSIGNMENT

Page 22 ends

29 30
(35%)
35%
(35%) 35%
(50%)
(15%)
9/10
14/16
9/10
9/10 33/36
-11/-12
44/48
52/57
30/34
32 33
Cathedral Cove Center Traffic Analysis
EXHIBIT 4-5: CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT MAP
C4 C5 C6
RM5
P2
P4
RM24
P3
P1
RM10 RM21
RM19 RM16
RM17
C16
C7 RM1 RM15
C11 C2
C12
C14
C17 C13
C8 C1 C18
C15 RM31 C19
C9
SITE
RM26
RM11
C10 C3
RM29
RM27
RM9
RM28
RM30
RM12
RM13 RM4
RM6
RM2
RM8 RM7
RM32
RM25
RM23
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
N
12962 - 08 - CD Map.mxd
34 45
46 APPENDIX G -

CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Date Palm Drive & McCallum Way
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/30/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
91 91
0 228
228
0 106
106
0 67
67 0
157
157
0 83
83 0
46 46
0 638
638
0 48
48 0
112
112
0 1137
1137
0 74
74 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00 1.00
No
1870
253

0.90 2
402

0.34 1200
0 1.00
No
1870
174

0.90 2
384

0.34 1145
0 1.00
No
1870
709

0.90 2
1484

0.31 4844
497
1702

5.3 1.00
No
1870
1263

0.90 2
1680

0.34 4887
880
1702

10.2 10.2
1870
101

0.90 2
401

0.34 1112
101
1112

3.5 1870
118

0.90 2
188

0.34 560
371
1759

7.9 1870
74 0.90
2 320

0.34 1010
74 1010

3.0 10.9

1.00 320

0.23 569

1.00 1.00

17.1 0.4
1870
92 0.90
2 203

0.34 605
266
1750

5.3 1870
51 0.90
2 1870
53 0.90
2 110

0.31 360
265
1800

5.4 1870
124

0.90 2
160

0.09 1781
124
1781

3.0 1870
82 0.90
2 93 109

0.34 317
465
1801

10.2 10.2

0.18 619

0.75 685

1.00 1.00

13.0 4.2

0.05 1781
51 1781

1.2 1.2

1.00 93

0.55 199

1.00 1.00

20.7 4.9
Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0

0.0 8.8 7.9 0.0 5.3 5.3 5.4 3.0

1.00 401

0.25 675

1.00 1.00

15.1 0.3

0.32 590

0.63 1023

1.00 1.00

12.5 1.1

0.35 587

0.45 1018

1.00 1.00

11.6 0.5

0.20 551

0.48 564

1.00 1.00

12.6 0.7

1.00 160

0.77 319

1.00 1.00

19.9 7.7
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0

0.00 0

1.00 0.00

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0
1043

0.48 1066

1.00 1.00

12.6 0.3
1170

0.75 1294

1.00 1.00

13.0 2.3

0.0 0.8

0.0 0.0

0.0 2.8

0.0 0.7

0.0 1.8

0.0 0.6

0.0 1.5

0.0 1.7

0.0 1.4

0.0 3.1

0.0 3.6

15.4 B

0.0 A

13.6 B

17.5 B

0.0 A

12.2 B

25.5 C

12.9 B

13.3 B

27.7 C

15.3 B

17.2 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
472

14.0 B
340

13.3 B
813

13.8 B
1469

16.9 B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

8.0 4.0

8.0 5.0

0.1 2

17.7 4.0

14.0 7.4
4 19.0

4.0 26.0

10.8 2.6
5 6.3

4.0 5.0

3.2 0.0
6 19.4

4.0 17.0

12.2 3.1
8 19.0

4.0 26.0

12.9 1.7
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

15.3 B
Cumulative Year 2027
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Date Palm Drive & Rosemount Road
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/30/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
56 56
0 56
56 0
70 70
0 74
74 0
79 79
0 229
229
0 98
98 0
696
696
0 45
45 0
169
169
0 1129
1129
0 79
79 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00
No
1870
61 0.92
2 163

0.22 757
0 1.00
No
1870
86 0.92
2 107

0.25 423
0 1.00
No
1870
757

0.92 2
1291

0.26 4902
525
1702

7.2 1.00
No
1870
1227

0.92 2
1539

0.32 4872
857
1702

12.3 12.3
1870
61 0.92
2 1870
76 0.92
2 204

0.22 943
137
1701

3.7 1870
80 0.92
2 166

0.09 1781
80 1781

2.3 1870
249

0.92 2
1870
107

0.92 2
137

0.08 1781
107
1781

3.2 1870
49 0.92
2 1870
184

0.92 2
230

0.13 1781
184
1781

5.4 1870
86 0.92
2 99 311

0.25 1226
335
1650

10.2 10.2

0.74 418

0.80 646

1.00 1.00

18.8 4.1
83 108

0.32 341
456
1809

12.4 12.4

0.19 571

0.80 607

1.00 1.00

16.8 7.0

0.06 1781
61 1781

1.8 1.8

1.00 99

0.62 166

1.00 1.00

24.8 6.1

0.26 316
281
1813

7.2 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0

0.0 3.7 2.3 0.0 3.2 7.2 7.2 5.4

0.55 367

0.37 666

1.00 1.00

17.9 0.6

1.00 166

0.48 166

1.00 1.00

23.1 2.2

1.00 137

0.78 166

1.00 1.00

24.3 17.7

0.0 0.17
478

0.59 507

1.00 1.00

17.2 1.6

1.00 230

0.80 266

1.00 1.00

22.7 13.9

0.0 0

0.00 0

1.00 0.00

0.0 0.0
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 896

0.59 952

1.00 1.00

17.2 0.8
1075

0.80 1143

1.00 1.00

16.8 3.8

0.0 0.9

0.0 0.0

0.0 1.4

0.0 1.0

0.0 3.9

0.0 2.6

0.0 2.9

0.0 4.8

0.0 1.9 3.0 5.6

30.8 C

0.0 A

18.6 B

25.2 C

0.0 A

22.8 C

42.1 D

18.0 B

18.8 B

36.6 D

20.6 C

23.8 C
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
198

22.3 C
415

23.3 C
913

21.1 C
1497

23.5 C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

10.9 4.0

8.0 7.4
2 18.1

4.0 15.0

9.2 3

9.0 4.0

5.0 4.3

0.0 4

15.6 4.0

21.0 5.7
5 8.1

4.0 5.0

5.2 0.0
6 20.9

4.0 18.0

14.4 2.6
7 7.0

4.0 5.0

3.8 0.0
8 17.6

4.0 21.0

12.2 1.4
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.5 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

22.7 C
Cumulative Year 2027
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Date Palm Drive & 30th Avenue
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/30/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
105
105
0 268
268
0 135
135
0 81
81 0
143
143
0 167
167
0 180
180
0 756
756
0 40
40 0
233
233
0 1220
1220
0 70
70 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00
No
1870
291

0.92 2
441

0.24 1870
291
1870

9.4 1.00
No
1870
155

0.92 2
419

0.22 1870
155
1870

4.7 1.00
No
1870
822

0.92 2
1481

0.30 4968
563
1702

9.3 1.00
No
1870
1326

0.92 2
1624

0.33 4939
914
1702

16.5 16.5
1870
114

0.92 2
133

0.07 1781
114
1781

4.2 1870
147

0.92 2
361

0.24 1532
147
1532

5.4 1870
88 0.92
2 113

0.06 1781
88 1781

3.3 1870
182

0.92 2
345

0.22 1537
182
1537

7.0 1870
196

0.92 2
238

0.13 1781
196
1781

7.2 1870
43 0.92
2 1870
253

0.92 2
292

0.16 1781
253
1781

9.3 1870
76 0.92
2 77 93

0.30 259
302
1823

9.4 0.33
283
488
1818

16.5 16.5

0.16 598

0.82 651

1.00 1.00

20.6 7.4
Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS

4.2 9.4 5.4 3.3 4.7 7.0 7.2 9.3 9.4 9.3

1.00 133

0.86 133

1.00 1.00

30.6 39.2

0.0 1.00
361

0.41 595

1.00 1.00

21.6 0.7

1.00 113

0.78 133

1.00 1.00

30.9 21.9

0.0 1.00
345

0.53 596

1.00 1.00

22.9 1.3

1.00 238

0.82 239

1.00 1.00

28.3 20.3

0.0 0.14
543

0.56 599

1.00 1.00

19.8 0.9

1.00 292

0.86 292

1.00 1.00

27.3 22.6

0.0 441

0.66 726

1.00 1.00

23.2 1.7
419

0.37 726

1.00 1.00

22.0 0.5
1015

0.55 1118

1.00 1.00

19.8 0.5
1120

0.82 1220

1.00 1.00

20.6 4.1

0.0 3.9

0.0 1.8

0.0 1.9

0.0 2.4

0.0 3.3

0.0 3.6

0.0 5.9

0.0 3.1 2.0 4.1 5.2 6.9

69.9 E

24.9 C

22.4 C

52.8 D

22.5 C

24.1 C

48.6 D

20.3 C

20.7 C

49.9 D

24.8 C

28.1 C
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
552

33.5 C
425

29.5 C
1061

25.6 C
1655

29.6 C
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s
1 15.0

4.0 2

24.0 4.0

22.0 11.4

3.8 3

8.2 4.0

5.0 5.3

0.0 4

19.8 4.0

26.0 11.4

1.7 5

12.9 4.0

9.0 9.2
6 26.0

4.0 24.0

18.5 3.5
7 9.0

4.0 5.0

6.2 0.0
8 19.0

4.0 26.0

9.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

29.0 C
Cumulative Year 2027
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
4: Date Palm Drive & Tachevah Drive 05/30/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
32 115
32 115
46 970 1351
46 970 1351
13 13
0 0 0 0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
0 0
0 -
-
-
250 -
0 0
-
0 0
-
-
-
-
-
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
97 2
33 119
97 2
97 2
97 2
97 2
97 2
47 1000 1393 13
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
1894 703 1406 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1400
494
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1

5.74 7.14 5.34

6.64 6.04
-
-
-
-

3.82 3.92 3.12
107 326 248
137
529
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
87 326 248
87 111
529
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s

HCM LOS
EB
61 F
NB
1 SB
0 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
248

0.191

22.9 C
- 204 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 0.743
-
-
-
61 F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 4.9
Cumulative Year 2027
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
5: Date Palm Drive & Project Driveway 05/30/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
0 0
0 23 811
23 811
13 13
0 0
0 0
1306
1306
0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
-
0 0
0 -
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 - 0 0
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
92 2
0 92
2 25 882
92 2
92 2
14 92
2 0
92 2
1420
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 448 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1

7.14 -
-

3.92 477
-
Stage 2 -
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
477 -
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s

HCM LOS
WB
13 B
NB
0 SB
0 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBT NBRWBLn1 SBT
-
-
-
-
-
- 477 -
-
-
-
-
- 0.052
-
-
-
13 B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2
Cumulative Year 2027
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
6: San Vicente Avenue/Existing Driveway & McCallum Way 05/30/2024 Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
13 374
13 374
0 0
0 0
0 0
298
298
0 6
6 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 4
4 0
0 0
0 8
8 0 0 0
Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
-
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
92 2
14 407
92 2
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
324
92 2
7 92
2 0
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
4 92
2 0
92 2
9 Major/Minor
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
Major1
331
Major2 Minor1 Minor2
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
407 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
767 766 407 763 763 328
435 435
332 331

7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
-
-
-
-
-
328 328
435 435
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy

4.12 4.12
-
-
-
-
-
-

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
- - -

2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1228 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1152 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
319 333 644 321 334 713
600 580
681 645
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1228
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
685 647
600 580
-
-
1152 311 328 644 317 329 713
-
-
-
-
-
-
311 328
591 571
673 645
-
-
-
317 329
675 647
591 571
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s

HCM LOS
EB

0.3 WB
0 NB
0 A
SB

12.3 B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
- 1228 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
1152 -
-
-
-
-
- 503
- 0.012 -
0 A
0 - 0.026
0 8
A
0 0
A
-
-
-
-

12.3 B

0.1 A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) -
Cumulative Year 2027
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Date Palm Drive & McCallum Way
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/30/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
126
126
0 141
141
0 82
82 0
79 79
0 161
161
0 81
81 0
94 94
0 1238
1238
0 71
71 0
95 95
0 965
965
0 84
84 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00 1.00
No
1870
157

0.90 2
359

0.33 1104
0 1.00
No
1870
179

0.90 2
380

0.33 1167
0 1.00
No
1870
1376

0.90 2
1688

0.34 4936
949
1702

12.1 12.1

1.00 No
1870
1072

0.90 2
1635

0.34 4770
765
1702

9.0 1870
140

0.90 2
377

0.33 1109
140
1109

5.5 11.3

1.00 377

0.37 624

1.00 1.00

17.2 0.6
1870
91 0.90
2 208

0.33 640
248
1743

5.3 1870
88 0.90
2 393

0.33 1130
88 1130

3.1 1870
90 0.90
2 191

0.33 587
269
1754

5.8 1870
104

0.90 2
140

0.08 1781
104
1781

2.7 1870
79 0.90
2 1870
106

0.90 2
141

0.08 1781
106
1781

2.8 1870
93 0.90
2 142

0.34 413
400
1780

9.1 97

0.34 283
506
1815

12.1 12.1

0.16 621

0.82 651

1.00 1.00

14.2 7.6
Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0

0.0 5.3 8.5 0.0 5.8 2.7 2.8 9.0 9.1

0.37 568

0.44 956

1.00 1.00

12.6 0.5

1.00 393

0.22 645

1.00 1.00

15.9 0.3

0.33 571

0.47 962

1.00 1.00

12.7 0.6

1.00 140

0.74 225

1.00 1.00

21.4 7.5

1.00 141

0.75 188

1.00 1.00

21.4 11.0

0.0 0.23
610

0.66 610

1.00 1.00

13.2 2.6
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0

0.00 0

1.00 0.00

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0
1164

0.82 1220

1.00 1.00

14.2 4.2
1167

0.66 1167

1.00 1.00

13.2 1.3

0.0 1.3

0.0 0.0

0.0 1.9

0.0 0.8

0.0 2.1

0.0 1.2

0.0 4.0

0.0 4.9

0.0 2.7

0.0 1.4 3.1

17.8 B

0.0 A

13.1 B

16.2 B

0.0 A

13.3 B

28.9 C

18.5 B

21.9 C

32.4 C

14.5 B

15.8 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
388

14.8 B
357

14.0 B
1559

20.3 C
1271

16.4 B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

7.8 4.0

5.0 4.8

0.0 2

20.2 4.0

17.0 14.1

2.2 4

19.4 4.0

26.0 13.3

1.8 5

7.7 4.0

6.0 4.7

0.0 6

20.3 4.0

16.0 11.1

2.9 8

19.4 4.0

26.0 10.5

1.8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

17.7 B
Cumulative Year 2027
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Date Palm Drive & Rosemount Road
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/30/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
71 71
0 71
71 0
89 89
0 89
89 0
66 66
0 308
308
0 83
83 0
1350
1350
0 55
55 0
285
285
0 870
870
0 66
66 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00
No
1870
77 0.92
2 171

0.23 752
0 1.00
No
1870
72 0.92
2 1.00
No
1870
1467

0.92 2
1640

0.33 5032
992
1702

24.2 24.2

1.00 No
1870
946

0.92 2
2203

0.46 4841
665
1870
77 0.92
2 1870
97 0.92
2 216

0.23 948
174
1700

7.7 1870
97 0.92
2 123

0.07 1781
97 1781

4.7 1870
335

0.92 2
1870
90 0.92
2 116

0.07 1781
90 1781

4.3 1870
60 0.92
2 1870
310

0.92 2
1870
72 0.92
2 99 69 323

0.24 1341
407
1629

21.0 21.0

0.82 392

1.04 392

1.00 1.00

33.1 55.4

0.0 67 346

0.19 1781
310
1781

14.8 14.8

1.00 346

0.90 368

1.00 1.00

34.3 22.8

0.0 167

0.46 368
353
1804

11.6 11.6

0.20 821

0.43 821

1.00 1.00

16.1 0.4

0.06 1781
77 1781

3.7 3.7

1.00 99

0.78 123

1.00 1.00

40.6 21.9

0.0 0.24
288
0 0

0.0 0.0

0.33 206
535
1833

24.2 24.2

0.11 598

0.89 610

1.00 1.00

28.0 15.5

0.0 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 1702

11.5 7.7 4.7 4.3 11.5

0.56 387

0.45 409

1.00 1.00

29.0 0.8

1.00 123

0.79 123

1.00 1.00

40.0 28.7

0.0 1.00
116

0.78 204

1.00 1.00

40.1 10.6

0.0 0

0.00 0

1.00 0.00

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 1110

0.89 1132

1.00 1.00

28.0 9.3
1549

0.43 1549

1.00 1.00

16.1 0.2

0.0 3.2

0.0 10.8

0.0 4.3

0.0 2.2 3.0 14.0 2.2 12.7 8.4 4.6

62.6 E

0.0 A

29.8 C

68.6 E

0.0 A

88.4 F

50.7 D

37.2 D

43.5 D

57.1 E

16.3 B

16.5 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
251

39.8 D
504

84.6 F
1617

40.0 D
1328

25.8 C
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 16.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s
1 20.9

4.0 2

32.4 4.0

29.0 26.2

2.2 3

10.0 4.0

6.0 6.7
4 23.8

4.0 21.0

9.7 5

9.7 4.0

10.0 6.3

0.1 6

43.7 4.0

37.0 13.6

7.4 7

8.8 4.0

6.0 5.7

0.0 8

25.0 4.0

21.0 23.0

0.1 0.0 0.7 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

41.0 D
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

Cumulative Year 2027
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Date Palm Drive & 30th Avenue
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/30/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
94 94
0 142
142
0 137
137
0 41
41 0
132
132
0 148
148
0 326
326
0 1321
1321
0 39
39 0
32 32
0 1052
1052
0 106
106
0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.96 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00
No
1870
154

0.92 2
409

0.22 1870
154
1870

5.1 1.00
No
1870
143

0.92 2
349

0.19 1870
143
1870

4.9 1.00
No
1870
1436

0.92 2
2463

0.48 5098
959
1702

14.6 14.6

1.00 No
1870
1143

0.92 2
1383

0.29 4713
825
1702

16.3 16.3
1870
102

0.92 2
130

0.07 1781
102
1781

4.1 1870
149

0.92 2
335

0.22 1530
149
1530

6.1 1870
45 0.92
2 1870
161

0.92 2
286

0.19 1531
161
1531

6.9 1870
354

0.92 2
1870
42 0.92
2 1870
35 0.92
2 1870
115

0.92 2
73 400

0.22 1781
354
1781

13.9 13.9

1.00 400

0.88 469

1.00 1.00

27.1 16.2

0.0 72 62 139

0.29 474
433
1783

16.3 16.3

0.27 523

0.83 569

1.00 1.00

23.8 9.2

0.04 1781
45 1781

1.8 1.8

1.00 73

0.61 148

1.00 1.00

34.0 8.0

0.48 149
519
1843

14.6 14.6

0.08 891

0.58 920

1.00 1.00

13.4 0.9

0.03 1781
35 1781

1.4 1.4

1.00 62

0.56 148

1.00 1.00

34.3 7.7
Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS

4.1 5.1 6.1 4.9 6.9

1.00 130

0.78 148

1.00 1.00

32.9 21.0

0.0 1.00
335

0.45 551

1.00 1.00

24.4 0.9

1.00 286

0.56 552

1.00 1.00

26.6 1.7
409

0.38 674

1.00 1.00

24.0 0.6
349

0.41 674

1.00 1.00

25.8 0.8
1645

0.58 1699

1.00 1.00

13.4 0.5
999

0.83 1086

1.00 1.00

23.8 5.0

0.0 2.1

0.0 2.1

0.0 0.9

0.0 2.0

0.0 2.4

0.0 4.6

0.0 5.1

0.0 0.7

0.0 6.2

0.0 2.4 7.1 7.1

53.8 D

24.6 C

25.3 C

42.0 D

26.6 C

28.4 C

43.2 D

13.9 B

14.3 B

42.0 D

28.8 C

32.9 C
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
405

32.2 C
349

29.4 C
1832

19.7 B
1293

30.5 C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

6.5 4.0

6.0 3.4

0.0 2

38.8 4.0

36.0 16.6

9.3 3

7.0 4.0

6.0 3.8

0.0 4

19.8 4.0

26.0 8.1
5 20.2

4.0 19.0

15.9 0.3
6 25.2

4.0 23.0

18.3 2.8
7 9.3

4.0 6.0

6.1 0.0
8 17.5

4.0 26.0

8.9 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

25.5 C
Cumulative Year 2027
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
4: Date Palm Drive & Tachevah Drive 05/30/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
26 26
0 73
73 0
97 1379 1154
97 1379 1154
55 55
0 0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
0 0
0 -
-
-
250 -
0 0
-
0 0
-
-
-
-
-
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
97 2
27 97
2 97
2 97
2 97
2 97
2 75 100 1422 1190 57
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
1988 624 1247 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1219
769
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1

5.74 7.14 5.34

6.64 6.04
-
-
-
-

3.82 3.92 3.12
95 367 297
177
379
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
63 367 297
63 117
379
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s

HCM LOS
EB
59 F
NB

1.5 SB
0 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
297

0.337

23.2 C
-
-
-
-
-
162

0.63 59
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 3.5
Cumulative Year 2027
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
5: Date Palm Drive & Project Driveway 05/30/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
0 0
0 87 1416
87 1416
27 27
0 0
0 0
1150
1150
0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
-
0 0
0 -
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 - 0 0
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
92 2
0 92
2 95 1539
92 2
92 2
29 92
2 0
92 2
1250
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 784 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1

7.14 -
-

3.92 288
-
Stage 2 -
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
288 -
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s 23.5
WB NB
0 SB
0 HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBT NBRWBLn1 SBT
-
-
-
-
-
- 288 -
-
-
-
-
- 0.328
-
-
-

23.5 C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4
Cumulative Year 2027
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
6: San Vicente Avenue/Existing Driveway & McCallum Way 05/30/2024 Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
27 290
27 290
0 0
0 0
0 0
303
303
0 13
13 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 14
14 0
0 0
0 29
29 0 0 0
Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
-
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
92 2
29 315
92 2
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
329
92 2
14 92
2 0
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
15 92
2 0
92 2
32 Major/Minor
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
Major1
343
Major2 Minor1 Minor2
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
315 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
725 716 315 709 709 336
373 373
352 343

7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
-
-
-
-
-
336 336
373 373
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy

4.12 4.12
-
-
-
-
-
-

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
- - -

2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1216 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1245 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
340 356 725 349 359 706
648 618
665 637
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1216
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
678 642
648 618
-
-
1245 318 346 725 341 349 706
-
-
-
-
-
-
318 346
629 600
635 637
-
-
-
341 349
658 642
629 600
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s

HCM LOS
EB

0.7 WB
0 NB
0 A
SB

12.5 B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
- 1216 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
1245 -
-
-
-
-
- 524
- 0.024 -
0 A
0 - 0.089
0 A
-
8 A
0 A
-
-
-
-

12.5 B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.3
Cumulative Year 2027
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report

APPENDIX H -

WITH IMPROVEMENTS PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS AND SIGNAL

WARRANT WORKSHEETS
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Date Palm Drive & Tachevah Drive
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
32 32
0 115
115
0 46
46 0
814
814
0 1193
1193
0 13
13 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00
No
1870
33 0.97
2 43

0.12 351
153
1625

2.7 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
No
1870
839

0.97 2
3121

0.61 5274
839
1702

2.3 1.00
No
1870
1230

0.97 2
2213

0.42 5378
804
1702

5.4 1870
119

0.97 2
156

0.12 1264
0 1870
47 0.97
2 1870
13 0.97
2 23

0.42 55
439
1860

5.4 96

0.05 1781
47 1781

0.8 0.8

1.00 96

0.49 295

1.00 1.00

13.9 3.8
Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0.78
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 2.7 2.3 5.4 5.4

0.22 201

0.76 1292

1.00 1.00

12.8 5.8

0.03 790

0.56 1171

1.00 1.00

6.5 0.6

0.0 0.6
3121

0.27 4735

1.00 1.00

2.7 0.0

0.0 0.0
1446

0.56 2142

1.00 1.00

6.5 0.3

0.0 0.5

0.0 1.1

0.0 0.3

18.6 B

0.0 A

17.7 B

2.8 A

6.9 A

7.2 A
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
153

18.6 B
886

3.6 A
1243

7.0 A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2

22.5 4.0

28.0 4.3
4 7.7

4.0 24.0

4.7 0.4
5 5.6

4.0 5.0

2.8 0.0
6 16.8

4.0 19.0

7.4 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.2 5.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

6.4 A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Project Completion Year 2027 With Improvements
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Date Palm Drive & Tachevah Drive
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
26 26
0 73
73 0
97 97
0 1156
1156
0 914
914
0 55
55 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00
No
1870
27 0.98
2 43

0.10 433
102
1635

1.6 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
No
1870
1180

0.98 2
3109

0.61 5274
1180
1702

3.2 1.00
No
1870
933

0.98 2
1803

0.37 5095
644
1702

4.0 1870
74 0.98
2 117

0.10 1186
0 1870
99 0.98
2 172

0.10 1781
99 1781

1.5 1870
56 0.98
2 108

0.37 295
345
1817

4.1 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0.73
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 1.6 1.5 3.2 4.0 4.1

0.26 161

0.63 1435

1.00 1.00

11.9 4.1

1.00 172

0.58 521

1.00 1.00

11.8 3.0

0.16 665

0.52 1063

1.00 1.00

6.8 0.6

0.0 0.5
3109

0.38 5228

1.00 1.00

2.7 0.1

0.0 0.0
1246

0.52 1992

1.00 1.00

6.8 0.3

0.0 0.4

0.0 0.6

0.0 0.4

15.9 B

0.0 A

14.8 B

2.8 A

7.1 A

7.4 A
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
102

15.9 B
1279

3.7 A
989

7.2 A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2

20.7 4.0

28.0 5.2
4 6.7

4.0 24.0

3.6 0.3
5 6.6

4.0 8.0

3.5 0.1
6 14.0

4.0 16.0

6.1 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 7.7 3.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

5.7 A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Project Completion Year 2027 With Improvements
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Rev 6 Scenario: Project Completion Year 2027 Conditions Major Approach: Date Palm Drive
Minor Approach: Tachevah Drive
WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR
(Part A or Part B must be satisfied) SATISFIED YES
YES
NO
Part A NO SATISFIED
(All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same

1. The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for one-lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES
YES
NO
NO 2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
YES
YES
NO

SATISFIED NO
Part B
Two
APPROACH LANES One or More
Both Approaches - Major Street
Higher Approach - Minor Street
2066
147

ENTER CORRECT HOURS
ENTER PEAK HOUR VOL.

The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 (Urban Areas) OR The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-4 (Rural Areas) YES
YES
NO
NO
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.

My Results (Minimum
Vehicles)
425
400
375
350
325
300
275
250
225
200
175
150
125
100
75 147
50 25
0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Major Street
Total of Both Approaches - VPH
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Date Palm Drive & Tachevah Drive
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/30/2024
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
32 32
0 115
115
0 46
46 0
970
970
0 1351
1351
0 13
13 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00
No
1870
33 0.97
2 43

0.12 351
153
1625

2.9 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
No
1870
1000

0.97 2
3192

0.63 5274
1000
1702

2.9 1.00
No
1870
1393

0.97 2
2328

0.45 5385
909
1702

6.4 1870
119

0.97 2
157

0.12 1264
0 1870
47 0.97
2 1870
13 0.97
2 22

0.45 49
497
1862

6.4 95

0.05 1781
47 1781

0.8 0.8

1.00 95

0.49 279

1.00 1.00

14.7 3.9
Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0.78
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 2.9 2.9 6.4 6.4

0.22 201

0.76 1224

1.00 1.00

13.5 5.8

0.03 831

0.60 1110

1.00 1.00

6.7 0.7

0.0 0.8
3192

0.31 4485

1.00 1.00

2.8 0.1

0.0 0.0
1519

0.60 2029

1.00 1.00

6.7 0.4

0.0 0.6

0.0 1.2

0.0 0.3

19.3 B

0.0 A

18.6 B

2.8 A

7.0 A

7.4 A
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
153

19.3 B
1047

3.5 A
1406

7.2 A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2

23.9 4.0

28.0 4.9
4 7.9

4.0 24.0

4.9 0.4
5 5.7

4.0 5.0

2.8 0.0
6 18.2

4.0 19.0

8.4 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.4 5.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

6.4 A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Cumulative Year 2027 With Improvements
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Date Palm Drive & Tachevah Drive
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/30/2024
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
26 26
0 73
73 0
97 97
0 1379
1379
0 1154
1154
0 55
55 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00
No
1870
27 0.98
2 41

0.10 433
102
1635

1.8 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
No
1870
1407

0.98 2
3272

0.64 5274
1407
1702

4.1 1.00
No
1870
1178

0.98 2
2075

0.42 5163
803
1702

5.5 1870
74 0.98
2 113

0.10 1186
0 1870
99 0.98
2 166

0.09 1781
99 1781

1.6 1870
56 0.98
2 99

0.42 237
431
1828

5.5 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0.73
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 1.8 1.6 4.1 5.5 5.5

0.26 156

0.66 1296

1.00 1.00

13.2 4.6

1.00 166

0.60 353

1.00 1.00

13.2 3.4

0.13 759

0.57 1086

1.00 1.00

6.8 0.7

0.0 0.7
3272

0.43 4721

1.00 1.00

2.7 0.1

0.0 0.0
1414

0.57 2023

1.00 1.00

6.8 0.4

0.0 0.6

0.0 0.7

0.0 0.5

17.9 B

0.0 A

16.6 B

2.8 A

7.1 A

7.4 A
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
102

17.9 B
1506

3.7 A
1234

7.2 A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2

23.4 4.0

28.0 6.1
4 6.9

4.0 24.0

3.8 0.3
5 6.8

4.0 6.0

3.6 0.0
6 16.6

4.0 18.0

7.5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 9.4 5.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

5.7 A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

Cumulative Year 2027 With Improvements
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Rev 6 Scenario: Cumulative Year 2027 Conditions Major Approach: Date Palm Drive
Minor Approach: Tachevah Drive
WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR

SATISFIED

SATISFIED
(Part A or Part B must be satisfied) YES
YES
NO
Part A NO
(All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same

1. The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for one-lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES
YES
NO
NO 2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
YES
YES
NO

SATISFIED NO
Part B
Two
APPROACH LANES One or More
Both Approaches - Major Street
Higher Approach - Minor Street
2380
147

ENTER CORRECT HOURS
ENTER PEAK HOUR VOL.

The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 (Urban Areas) OR The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-4 (Rural Areas) YES
YES
NO
NO
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.

My Results (Minimum
Vehicles)
425
400
375
350
325
300
275
250
225
200
175
150
125
100
75 147
50 25
0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Major Street
Total of Both Approaches - VPH

APPENDIX J -
INTERSECTION 2 SIGNAL WARRANT WORKSHEETS
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Rev 6 Scenario: Project Completion Year 2027 Conditions Major Approach: Date Palm Drive
Minor Approach: Rosemount Road
WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR
(Part A or Part B must be satisfied) SATISFIED YES
YES
NO
Part A NO SATISFIED
(All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same

1. The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for one-lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES
YES
NO
NO 2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
YES
YES
NO

SATISFIED NO
Part B
Two
APPROACH LANES One or More
Both Approaches - Major Street
Higher Approach - Minor Street
2153
375

ENTER CORRECT HOURS
ENTER PEAK HOUR VOL.

The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 (Urban Areas) OR The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-4 (Rural Areas) YES
YES
NO
NO
My Results (Minimum
Vehicles)
425
400
375
350
325
300
275
250
225
200
175
150
125
100
75 375
50 25
0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Major Street
Total of Both Approaches - VPH
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Rev 6 Scenario: Cumulative Year 2027 Conditions Major Approach: Date Palm Drive
Minor Approach: Rosemount Road
WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR

SATISFIED

SATISFIED
(Part A or Part B must be satisfied) YES
YES
NO
Part A NO
(All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same

1. The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for one-lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES
YES
NO
NO 2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
YES
YES
NO

SATISFIED NO
Part B
Two
APPROACH LANES One or More
Both Approaches - Major Street
Higher Approach - Minor Street
2709
463

ENTER CORRECT HOURS
ENTER PEAK HOUR VOL.

The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 (Urban Areas) OR The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-4 (Rural Areas) YES
YES
NO
NO
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.

My Results (Minimum
Vehicles)
500
463
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50 0
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Major Street
Total of Both Approaches - VPH

APPENDIX J -
SCENARIO 1 AM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS AND SIGNAL

WARRANT WORKSHEETS
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Date Palm Drive & McCallum Way
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
59 59
0 225
225
0 106
106
0 67
67 0
158
158
0 48
48 0
46 46
0 499
499
0 48
48 0
95 95
0 981
981
0 53
53 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00 1.00
No
1870
250

0.90 2
400

0.33 1195
0 1.00
No
1870
176

0.90 2
461

0.33 1379
0 1.00
No
1870
554

0.90 2
1404

0.30 4742
396
1702

3.9 1.00
No
1870
1090

0.90 2
1619

0.33 4950
749
1702

8.0 1870
66 0.90
2 444

0.33 1150
66 1150

2.0 1870
118

0.90 2
189

0.33 564
368
1759

7.4 1870
74 0.90
2 331

0.33 1013
74 1013

2.8 10.2

1.00 331

0.22 618

1.00 1.00

16.1 0.3
1870
53 0.90
2 139

0.33 415
229
1794

4.1 1870
51 0.90
2 1870
53 0.90
2 133

0.30 449
211
1787

4.0 1870
106

0.90 2
150

0.08 1781
106
1781

2.4 1870
59 0.90
2 95 88

0.05 1781
51 1781

1.2 1.2

1.00 95

0.54 212

1.00 1.00

19.4 4.6

0.33 268
400
1814

8.0 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0

0.0 6.1 7.4 0.0 4.1 3.9 4.0 2.4 8.0 8.0

1.00 444

0.15 769

1.00 1.00

13.0 0.2

0.32 588

0.63 1086

1.00 1.00

11.8 1.1

0.23 600

0.38 1108

1.00 1.00

10.7 0.4

0.25 529

0.40 594

1.00 1.00

11.8 0.5

1.00 150

0.71 338

1.00 1.00

18.8 5.9

0.15 593

0.67 732

1.00 1.00

12.2 1.8
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0

0.00 0

1.00 0.00

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0
1008

0.39 1132

1.00 1.00

11.8 0.2
1114

0.67 1375

1.00 1.00

12.2 0.9

0.0 0.5

0.0 0.0

0.0 2.6

0.0 0.6

0.0 1.4

0.0 0.5

0.0 1.1

0.0 1.2

0.0 1.1

0.0 2.2

0.0 2.5

13.2 B

0.0 A

12.9 B

16.4 B

0.0 A

11.1 B

24.1 C

12.1 B

12.3 B

24.7 C

13.2 B

14.0 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
434

12.9 B
303

12.4 B
658

13.1 B
1255

14.4 B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

7.6 4.0

8.0 4.4

0.1 2

16.5 4.0

14.0 6.0
4 18.1

4.0 26.0

9.4 5

6.2 4.0

5.0 3.2

0.0 6

17.8 4.0

17.0 10.0

3.8 8

18.1 4.0

26.0 12.2

1.4 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.2 2.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

13.6 B
Project (Scenario 1) Completion Year 2027 Synchro 11 Report Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Date Palm Drive & Rosemount Road
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
63 63
0 233
233
0 582
582
0 44
44 0
186
186
0 1010
1010
0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00
No
1870
68 0.92
2 398

0.22 1781
68 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
No
1870
633

0.92 2
1281

0.26 5012
444
1702

3.6 1.00
No
1870
1098

0.92 2
2717

0.53 5274
1098
1702

4.2 1870
253

0.92 2
354

0.22 1585
253
1585

4.8 1870
48 0.92
2 1870
202

0.92 2
259

0.15 1781
202
1781

3.6 96

0.26 365
237
1805

3.6 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
1781

1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)

1.0 4.8 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.2

1.00 398

0.17 1144

1.00 1.00

10.3 0.2

1.00 354

0.71 1018

1.00 1.00

11.7 2.7

0.20 477

0.50 828

1.00 1.00

10.2 0.8

1.00 259

0.78 381

1.00 1.00

13.5 6.1
900

0.49 1561

1.00 1.00

10.2 0.4
2717

0.40 4059

1.00 1.00

4.6 0.1

0.0 0.7
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS

0.0 0.3

0.0 1.5

0.0 1.0

0.0 1.1

0.0 1.6

10.5 B

14.4 B

10.6 B

11.0 B

19.6 B

4.7 A
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
321

13.6 B
681

10.7 B
1300

7.0 A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

8.8 4.0

7.0 5.6

0.1 2

12.7 4.0

15.0 5.6
6 21.4

4.0 26.0

6.2 8

11.3 4.0

21.0 6.8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.0 7.9 0.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

9.0 A
Project (Scenario 1) Completion Year 2027 Synchro 11 Report Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Date Palm Drive & 30th Avenue
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/28/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
105
105
0 268
268
0 115
115
0 64
64 0
143
143
0 167
167
0 171
171
0 603
603
0 30
30 0
233
233
0 1056
1056
0 70
70 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00
No
1870
298

0.90 2
402

0.21 1870
298
1870

8.9 1.00
No
1870
159

0.90 2
354

0.19 1870
159
1870

4.5 1.00
No
1870
670

0.90 2
1428

0.29 4984
457
1702

6.6 1.00
No
1870
1173

0.90 2
1600

0.33 4889
817
1702

12.7 12.7
1870
117

0.90 2
149

0.08 1781
117
1781

3.8 1870
128

0.90 2
335

0.21 1561
128
1561

4.2 1870
71 0.90
2 103

0.06 1781
71 1781

2.3 1870
186

0.90 2
299

0.19 1583
186
1583

6.4 1870
190

0.90 2
235

0.13 1781
190
1781

6.2 1870
33 0.90
2 1870
259

0.90 2
308

0.17 1781
259
1781

8.4 1870
78 0.90
2 70 106

0.33 325
434
1810

12.7 12.7

0.18 592

0.73 727

1.00 1.00

17.8 3.0

0.29 244
246
1825

6.7 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS

3.8 8.9 4.2 2.3 4.5 6.4 6.2 6.6 6.7 8.4

1.00 149

0.78 149

1.00 1.00

26.8 23.4

0.0 1.00
335

0.38 679

1.00 1.00

20.0 0.7

1.00 103

0.69 149

1.00 1.00

27.6 7.9

1.00 299

0.62 689

1.00 1.00

22.2 2.1

1.00 235

0.81 268

1.00 1.00

25.2 14.9

0.0 0.13
523

0.47 672

1.00 1.00

17.6 0.7

1.00 308

0.84 328

1.00 1.00

23.9 16.9

0.0 402

0.74 814

1.00 1.00

21.9 2.7
354

0.45 814

1.00 1.00

21.5 0.9
975

0.47 1254

1.00 1.00

17.6 0.4
1114

0.73 1368

1.00 1.00

17.8 1.6

0.0 3.6

0.0 1.4

0.0 1.1

0.0 1.8

0.0 2.3

0.0 2.2

0.0 2.5

0.0 4.1

0.0 2.4 3.3 4.4 4.6

50.3 D

24.6 C

20.8 C

35.5 D

22.4 C

24.4 C

40.1 D

17.9 B

18.2 B

40.8 D

19.4 B

20.8 C
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
543

29.2 C
416

25.5 C
893

22.7 C
1510

23.5 C
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s
1 14.3

4.0 2

21.1 4.0

22.0 8.7
3 7.5

4.0 5.0

4.3 0.0
4 16.8

4.0 26.0

10.9 1.7
5 11.9

4.0 9.0

8.2 6

23.5 4.0

24.0 14.7

4.8 7

9.0 4.0

5.0 5.8

0.0 8

15.3 4.0

26.0 8.4

0.0 3.4 0.0 1.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

24.4 C
Project (Scenario 1) Completion Year 2027 Synchro 11 Report Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
4: Date Palm Drive & Tachevah Drive 05/28/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
32 114
32 114
47 816 1189
47 816 1189
13 13
0 0 0 0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
0 0
0 -
-
-
250 -
0 0
-
0 0
-
-
-
-
-
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
98 2
33 116
98 2
98 2
98 2
98 2
98 2
48 833 1213 13
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
1649 613 1226 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1220
429
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 121 373 304
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 121

5.74 7.14 5.34

6.64 6.04
-
-
-
-

3.82 3.92 3.12
144 373 304
177
571
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 1
Stage 2
149
571
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s 36.9
EB NB
1 SB
0 HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
304

0.158
19 - 256 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 0.582
-
-
-

36.9 C E
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 3.3
Project (Scenario 1) Completion Year 2027 Synchro 11 Report Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
5: Date Palm Drive & Project Driveway 05/28/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
0 0
0 50 595
50 595
18 18
0 0
0 0
1129
1129
0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
-
0 0
0 -
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 - 0 0
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
90 2
0 90
2 56 661
90 2
90 2
20 90
2 0
90 2
1254
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 341 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1

7.14 -
-

3.92 559
-
Stage 2 -
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
559 -
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s 12.1
WB NB
0 SB
0 HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBT NBRWBLn1 SBT
-
-
-
-
-
- 559 -
-
-
-
-
- 0.099
-
-
-

12.1 B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3
Project (Scenario 1) Completion Year 2027 Synchro 11 Report Timing Plan: AM Peak
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
6: San Vicente Avenue/Existing Driveway & McCallum Way 05/28/2024 Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
18 357
18 357
0 0
0 0
0 0
263
263
0 9
9 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 8
8 0
0 0
0 17
17 0 0 0
Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
-
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
92 2
20 388
92 2
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
286
92 2
10 92
2 0
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
9 92
2 0
92 2
18 Major/Minor
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
Major1
296
Major2 Minor1 Minor2
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
388 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
728 724 388 719 719 291
428 428
300 296

7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
-
-
-
-
-
291 291
428 428
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy

4.12 4.12
-
-
-
-
-
-

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
- - -

2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1265 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1170 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
339 352 660 344 354 748
605 585
709 668
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1265
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
717 672
605 585
-
-
1170 325 345 660 339 347 748
-
-
-
-
-
-
325 345
593 573
691 668
-
-
-
339 347
703 672
593 573
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s

HCM LOS
EB

0.4 WB
0 NB
0 A
SB
12 B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
- 1265 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
1170 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
540

0.05 12
- 0.015 -
0 A
0 0
A
-

7.9 A
0 A
-
B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.2
Project (Scenario 1) Completion Year 2027 Synchro 11 Report Timing Plan: AM Peak
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Rev 6 Scenario: Project (Scenario 1) Completion Year 2027 Conditions Major Approach: Date Palm Drive
Minor Approach: Rosemount Road
WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR
(Part A or Part B must be satisfied) SATISFIED YES
YES
NO
Part A NO SATISFIED
(All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same

1. The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for one-lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES
YES
NO
NO 2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
YES
YES
NO

SATISFIED NO
Part B
Two
APPROACH LANES One or More
Both Approaches - Major Street
Higher Approach - Minor Street
1822
296

ENTER CORRECT HOURS
ENTER PEAK HOUR VOL.

The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 (Urban Areas) OR The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-4 (Rural Areas) YES
YES
NO
NO
My Results (Minimum
Vehicles)
425
400
375
350
325
300
275
250
225
200
175
150
125
100
75 296
50 25
0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Major Street
Total of Both Approaches - VPH
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Date Palm Drive & McCallum Way
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/30/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
91 91
0 225
225
0 106
106
0 67
67 0
158
158
0 83
83 0
46 46
0 634
634
0 48
48 0
112
112
0 1139
1139
0 74
74 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.98 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00 1.00
No
1870
250

0.90 2
399

0.33 1195
0 1.00
No
1870
176

0.90 2
384

0.33 1150
0 1.00
No
1870
704

0.90 2
1487

0.31 4841
494
1702

5.2 1.00
No
1870
1266

0.90 2
1684

0.34 4888
882
1702

10.2 10.2
1870
101

0.90 2
399

0.33 1110
101
1110

3.5 1870
118

0.90 2
188

0.33 564
368
1759

7.9 1870
74 0.90
2 321

0.33 1013
74 1013

3.0 10.8

1.00 321

0.23 573

1.00 1.00

17.1 0.4
1870
92 0.90
2 201

0.33 601
268
1751

5.4 1870
51 0.90
2 1870
53 0.90
2 111

0.31 362
263
1800

5.3 1870
124

0.90 2
160

0.09 1781
124
1781

3.0 1870
82 0.90
2 94 109

0.34 317
466
1801

10.2 10.2

0.18 620

0.75 686

1.00 1.00

12.9 4.2

0.05 1781
51 1781

1.2 1.2

1.00 94

0.55 199

1.00 1.00

20.6 4.9
Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0

0.0 8.9 7.9 0.0 5.4 5.2 5.3 3.0

1.00 399

0.25 674

1.00 1.00

15.2 0.3

0.32 588

0.63 1024

1.00 1.00

12.5 1.1

0.34 585

0.46 1020

1.00 1.00

11.7 0.6

0.20 553

0.48 564

1.00 1.00

12.6 0.6

1.00 160

0.77 319

1.00 1.00

19.9 7.7
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0

0.00 0

1.00 0.00

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0
1045

0.47 1067

1.00 1.00

12.5 0.3
1173

0.75 1296

1.00 1.00

12.9 2.3

0.0 0.8

0.0 0.0

0.0 2.8

0.0 0.7

0.0 1.9

0.0 0.6

0.0 1.5

0.0 1.6

0.0 1.4

0.0 3.1

0.0 3.6

15.5 B

0.0 A

13.6 B

17.4 B

0.0 A

12.2 B

25.5 C

12.9 B

13.2 B

27.6 C

15.2 B

17.2 B
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
469

14.0 B
342

13.4 B
808

13.8 B
1472

16.9 B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

8.0 4.0

8.0 5.0

0.1 2

17.7 4.0

14.0 7.3
4 18.9

4.0 26.0

10.9 2.5
5 6.3

4.0 5.0

3.2 0.0
6 19.4

4.0 17.0

12.2 3.1
8 18.9

4.0 26.0

12.8 1.7
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

15.2 B
Cumulative Year 2027 (Scenario 1)
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Date Palm Drive & Rosemount Road
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/30/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
56 56
0 56
56 0
70 70
0 87
87 0
79 79
0 242
242
0 98
98 0
700
700
0 48
48 0
193
193
0 1129
1129
0 79
79 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00
No
1870
61 0.92
2 170

0.22 757
0 1.00
No
1870
86 0.92
2 106

0.26 406
0 1.00
No
1870
761

0.92 2
1195

0.24 4882
530
1702

7.6 1.00
No
1870
1227

0.92 2
1524

0.31 4872
857
1702

12.6 12.6
1870
61 0.92
2 1870
76 0.92
2 212

0.22 943
137
1701

3.7 1870
95 0.92
2 164

0.09 1781
95 1781

2.8 1870
263

0.92 2
1870
107

0.92 2
137

0.08 1781
107
1781

3.2 1870
52 0.92
2 1870
210

0.92 2
258

0.14 1781
210
1781

6.2 1870
86 0.92
2 99 324

0.26 1241
349
1647

10.8 10.8

0.75 430

0.81 636

1.00 1.00

18.9 5.0
81 107

0.31 341
456
1809

12.6 12.6

0.19 566

0.81 598

1.00 1.00

17.2 7.6

0.06 1781
61 1781

1.8 1.8

1.00 99

0.62 164

1.00 1.00

25.1 6.2

0.24 332
283
1811

7.6 Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS
0 0.0

0.0 0

0.0 3.7 2.8 0.0 3.2 7.6 7.6 6.2

0.55 382

0.36 656

1.00 1.00

17.8 0.6

1.00 164

0.58 164

1.00 1.00

23.7 5.1

1.00 137

0.78 164

1.00 1.00

24.7 18.2

0.0 0.18
443

0.64 499

1.00 1.00

18.4 2.3

1.00 258

0.81 262

1.00 1.00

22.6 17.5

0.0 0

0.00 0

1.00 0.00

0.0 0.0
0 0.00
0 1.00

0.00 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 833

0.64 939

1.00 1.00

18.4 1.2
1065

0.81 1126

1.00 1.00

17.2 4.2

0.0 0.9

0.0 0.0

0.0 1.4

0.0 1.3

0.0 4.3

0.0 2.8

0.0 3.1

0.0 4.9

0.0 2.0 3.6 5.7

31.3 C

0.0 A

18.4 B

28.8 C

0.0 A

23.9 C

42.9 D

19.6 B

20.7 C

40.0 D

21.3 C

24.7 C
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
198

22.4 C
444

24.9 C
920

22.6 C
1523

24.9 C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1

11.9 4.0

8.0 8.2
2 17.3

4.0 15.0

9.6 3

9.0 4.0

5.0 4.8

0.0 4

16.2 4.0

21.0 5.7
5 8.2

4.0 5.0

5.2 0.0
6 21.0

4.0 18.0

14.6 2.4
7 7.0

4.0 5.0

3.8 0.0
8 18.2

4.0 21.0

12.8 1.4
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.4 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

24.1 C
Cumulative Year 2027 (Scenario 1)
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Date Palm Drive & 30th Avenue
Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
05/30/2024
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
105
105
0 268
268
0 131
131
0 80
80 0
143
143
0 167
167
0 182
182
0 759
759
0 41
41 0
233
233
0 1214
1214
0 70
70 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.97 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00
No
1870
291

0.92 2
440

0.24 1870
291
1870

9.4 1.00
No
1870
155

0.92 2
418

0.22 1870
155
1870

4.7 1.00
No
1870
825

0.92 2
1479

0.30 4955
566
1702

9.4 1.00
No
1870
1320

0.92 2
1621

0.33 4938
910
1702

16.4 16.4
1870
114

0.92 2
133

0.07 1781
114
1781

4.2 1870
142

0.92 2
361

0.24 1532
142
1532

5.2 1870
87 0.92
2 111

0.06 1781
87 1781

3.2 1870
182

0.92 2
343

0.22 1536
182
1536

7.0 1870
198

0.92 2
240

0.13 1781
198
1781

7.2 1870
45 0.92
2 1870
253

0.92 2
293

0.16 1781
253
1781

9.3 1870
76 0.92
2 80 93

0.30 269
304
1821

9.4 0.33
284
486
1818

16.4 16.4

0.16 597

0.81 652

1.00 1.00

20.6 7.3
Sat Flow, veh/h
Grp Volume(v), veh/h
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln
Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h
HCM Platoon Ratio
Upstream Filter(I)
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh
LnGrp LOS

4.2 9.4 5.2 3.2 4.7 7.0 7.2 9.4 9.4 9.3

1.00 133

0.86 133

1.00 1.00

30.6 39.0

0.0 1.00
361

0.39 595

1.00 1.00

21.6 0.7

1.00 111

0.78 133

1.00 1.00

30.9 21.6

0.0 1.00
343

0.53 597

1.00 1.00

22.9 1.3

1.00 240

0.83 240

1.00 1.00

28.2 20.6

0.0 0.15
543

0.56 599

1.00 1.00

19.8 1.0

1.00 293

0.86 293

1.00 1.00

27.2 22.5

0.0 440

0.66 727

1.00 1.00

23.2 1.7
418

0.37 727

1.00 1.00

22.0 0.5
1016

0.56 1119

1.00 1.00

19.8 0.5
1118

0.81 1221

1.00 1.00

20.6 4.0

0.0 3.9

0.0 1.7

0.0 1.9

0.0 2.4

0.0 3.3

0.0 3.6

0.0 5.9

0.0 3.1 1.9 4.2 5.2 6.8

69.6 E

24.9 C

22.2 C

52.5 D

22.6 C

24.2 C

48.8 D

20.3 C

20.7 C

49.7 D

24.6 C

27.9 C
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
547

33.5 C
424

29.4 C
1068

25.7 C
1649

29.4 C
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s
1 15.0

4.0 2

24.0 4.0

22.0 11.4

3.8 3

8.2 4.0

5.0 5.2

0.0 4

19.8 4.0

26.0 11.4

1.7 5

13.0 4.0

9.0 9.2
6 26.0

4.0 24.0

18.4 3.6
7 9.0

4.0 5.0

6.2 0.0
8 18.9

4.0 26.0

9.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay
HCM 6th LOS

29.0 C
Cumulative Year 2027 (Scenario 1)
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
4: Date Palm Drive & Tachevah Drive 05/30/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, # 0
32 114
32 114
47 972 1347
47 972 1347
13 13
0 0 0 0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
0 -
-
250 -
0 0
-
0 0
-
-
-
97 2
13 -
Grade, % 0 -
97 2
-
97 2
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
97 2
97 2
97 2
33 118 48 1002 1389
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
1893 701 1402 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1396
497
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1

5.74 7.14 5.34

6.64 6.04
-
-
-
-

3.82 3.92 3.12
107 327 249
138
527
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
86 327 249
86 111
527
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s

HCM LOS
EB
61 F
NB

1.1 SB
0 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
249

0.195

22.9 C
- 203 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 0.741
-
-
-
61 F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 4.9
Cumulative Year 2027 (Scenario 1)
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
5: Date Palm Drive & Project Driveway 05/30/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, # 0
0 0
0 50 810
50 810
18 18
0 0 1308
0 1308
0 0 0 0
Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
- None - None - None
- 0
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
0 Grade, % 0
92 2
-
92 2
0 92
2 -
92 2
-
92 2
0 92
2 Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow 0 54 880 20 0 1422
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 450 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 0
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1

7.14 -
-

3.92 476
-
Stage 2 -
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
476 -
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s 13.5
WB NB
0 SB
0 HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBT NBRWBLn1 SBT
-
-
-
-
-
- 476 -
-
-
-
-
- 0.114
-
-
-

13.5 B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4
Cumulative Year 2027 (Scenario 1)
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Date Palm Drive Mixed Use
6: San Vicente Avenue/Existing Driveway & McCallum Way 05/30/2024 Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
18 374
18 374
0 0
0 0
0 0
298
298
0 9
9 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 8
8 0
0 0
0 17
17 0 0 0
Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, #
Grade, %
-
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None -
-
-
- None
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
-
0 -
-
- 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
92 2
20 407
92 2
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
324
92 2
10 92
2 0
92 2
0 92
2 0
92 2
9 92
2 0
92 2
18 Major/Minor
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
Major1
334
Major2 Minor1 Minor2
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
407 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
-
-
-
785 781 407 776 776 329
447 447
338 334

7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
-
-
-
-
-
329 329
447 447
-
Stage 2 -
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy

4.12 4.12
-
-
-
-
-
-

6.12 5.52

6.12 5.52
-
- - -

2.218 - 2.218
- 1152
- 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1225 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
310 326 644 315 328 712
591 573
676 643
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1225
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
684 646
591 573
-
-
- 1152 297 319 644 310 321 712
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
297 319
579 561
658 643
-
-
-
310 321
670 646
579 561
-
-
Stage 2 -
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s

HCM LOS
EB

0.4 WB
0 NB
0 A
SB

12.6 B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
- 1225
- 0.016
-
-
- 1152 -
-
-
-
-
- 503
-
-
-
-
-
0 A
0 - 0.054
0 A
-
8 A
0 0
A
-
-
-
-

12.6 B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2
Cumulative Year 2027 (Scenario 1)
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Synchro 11 Report
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Rev 6 Scenario: Cumulative Year 2027 Conditions (Scenario 1) Major Approach: Date Palm Drive
Minor Approach: Rosemount Road
WARRANT 3 - PEAK HOUR
(Part A or Part B must be satisfied) SATISFIED YES
YES
NO
Part A NO SATISFIED
(All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same

1. The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for one-lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES
YES
NO
NO 2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
YES
YES
NO

SATISFIED NO
Part B
Two
APPROACH LANES One or More
Both Approaches - Major Street
Higher Approach - Minor Street
2274
408

ENTER CORRECT HOURS
ENTER PEAK HOUR VOL.

The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 (Urban Areas) OR The plotted point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-4 (Rural Areas) YES
YES
NO
NO
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.

My Results (Minimum
Vehicles)
425
408 400
375
350
325
300
275
250
225
200
175
150
125
100
75 50
25 0
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Major Street
Total of Both Approaches - VPH

APPENDIX K -
HORIZON YEAR 2045 PLUS PROJECTS
QUEUE

ANALYSIS
Wren Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use1 Units2
DU
ITE LUCode Daily
In Out Total In Out Total
Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) 220 0.10 0.30 0.40 0.32 0.19 0.51 6.74 1Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021). 2DU = Dwelling Unit
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use1
Intensity Units2 Daily
In
20 20
Out
61 Total
81 In
65 65
Out
39 Total
Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) 204 DU 104 1,375
Total 61 81 39 104 1,375
1Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021). 2 DU = Dwelling Unit
Vallarta Shopping Center
AM Peak Hour
Out
PM Peak Hour
Out
Land Use1 Units2
ITE LUCode Daily
In Total

3.53 In Total
Shopping Plaza (40k-150k)3 TSF 8.61
TSF
821
934

2.19 22.75

1.34 4.13

17.18 4.48 88.08
Fast Food Restaurant w/ Drive-through Window 21.86 44.61 15.85 33.03 467.48 1 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021).

TSF = Thousand Square Feet 2
3 Peak hour and daily trip rates for LU 822 Strip Retail Plaza are based on fitted curve equations for total 127,000 sf of retail proposed for entire project.

AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use1 Intensity Units2 Daily
In
278
22 Out
170
22 Total
448
44 In
525
47 Out
569
34 Total
1,094
81 Shopping Plaza (40k-150k) 127.000 TSF 11,186
783 3
Internal Capture (8% - AM In, 13% - AM Out, 9% - PM In, 6% - PM Out, 7% - Daily) Pass-by Reduction (40% - PM Peak Hour & Daily)4
Subtotal
0 0 0 191
287
120
35 214
321
111
46 405
608
231
81 4,161
6,242
3,272
1,145
1,170
957
256
159
22 148
153
21 404
312
43 Fast Food Restaurant w/ Drive-through Window 7.000 TSF 3 Internal Capture (14% - AM In, 14% - AM Out, 29% - PM In, 41% - PM Out, 35% - Daily) Pass-by Reduction (50% - AM Peak Hour, 55% - PM Peak Hour & Daily)4 69 66 135
134
538
47 36 83
Subtotal 68 66 38 29 67
Total 324 214 325 350 675 7,199
1 2
3 4
Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021).

TSF = Thousand Square Feet
Internal Capture percentage is based on NCHRP Report 684, as recommended in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition.

Pass-by reduction percentage is based on the ITE methodology per 2021 Pass-By Tables for ITE Trip Generation Appendices.

Response to Comments
Rosemount Storage Project
Lead Agency:

City of Cathedral City
68700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero
Cathedral City, CA 92234
Prepared by:

The Altum Group
44-600 Village Court, Suite 100
Palm Desert, CA 92260
July 2024
44-600 Village Court, Suite 100
Palm Desert, CA 92260
760.346.4750 Tel
760.340.0089 Fax
The Altum Group 1 Response to Comments
July 26th 2024
Sandra Molina
Deputy Director
Community and Economic Development
City of Cathedral City
68700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero, CA 92234
SUBJECT: Response to Comments on the ISMND for the Rosemount Storage Project at Date Palm Drive, between McCallum Way and Rosemount Road.

Dear Sandra Molina,
On behalf of Three Mile Hallow, LLC, The Altum Group is submitting the enclosed responses to comments for the Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rosemount Storage Project.

The listed supporting information is provided as attachments to this letter:

Attachment A – California Department of Fish Wildlife Comment Letter and Response to Comments
Attachment B – Peerless at Mammoth LLC Comment Letter and Response to Comments.

Attachment C – Email from Citizen
Attachment D – Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Attachment E – Airport Land Use Commission Email

ATTACHEMNT A
Rosemount Storage Project 2 Response to Comments
Attachment A
California Department of Fish and Wildlife Comment Letter and Response to Comments
Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cathedral City
July 22, 2024

Page 3 ends

CDFW has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species (i.e., biological resources). CDFW offers the comments and recommendations below to assist the City in adequately identifying and/or mitigating the Project’s significant, or potentially significant, direct and indirect impacts on fish and wildlife (biological) resources. The MND has not adequately identified and disclosed the Project’s impacts (i.e., direct, indirect, and cumulative) on biological resources and whether those impacts are reduced to less than significant.

CDFW’s comments and recommendations on the MND are explained in greater detail below and summarized here. CDFW is concerned that the MND does not adequately identify or mitigate the Project’s significant, or potentially significant, impacts to biological resources. CDFW requests that additional information and analyses be added to a revised MND, along with avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures that avoid or reduce impacts to less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
CEQA requires that an MND include mitigation measures to avoid or reduce significant impacts. CDFW is concerned that the mitigation measures proposed in the MND are not adequate to avoid or reduce impacts to biological resources to below a level of significance. To support the City in ensuring that Project impacts to biological resources are reduced to less than significant, CDFW recommends adding mitigation measures for burrowing owl, artificial nighttime lighting, salvage of sand-dependent Covered Species, and Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) compliance, as well as revising the mitigation measure for nesting birds. 1) Nesting Birds
It is the Project proponent’s responsibility to comply with all applicable laws related to nesting birds and birds of prey. Fish and Game Code sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 afford protective measures as follows: section 3503 states that it is unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation made pursuant thereto. Fish and Game Code section 3503.5 makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes (birds-of-prey) or to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto. Fish and Game Code section 3513 makes it unlawful to take or possess any migratory nongame bird except as provided by rules and regulations adopted by the Secretary of the Interior under provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq.).

Permittees of the CVMSHCP must ensure that Covered Activities within their jurisdictions—both inside and outside Conservation Areas—do not take, possess, or Comment 1
Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cathedral City
July 22, 2024

Page 4 ends

needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of nesting birds. Per Section 3.5.6 of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) Permit #2835-2008-001-06 for the CVMSHCP, “take outside of Conservation Areas will be consistent with sections 3503 and 3503.5 of the Fish and Game Code.” Per Section

13.2 of the CVMSHCP Implementing Agreement, County and Cities’ obligations include, but are not limited to, taking “all necessary and appropriate actions, following applicable land use permit enforcement procedures and practices, to enforce the terms of project approvals for public and private projects, including compliance with the MSHCP, the Permits and this Agreement.”

Page 5 ends

(Biological Assessment) indicates that the “project site [and] surrounding area have the potential to provide suitable nesting habitat for year-round and seasonal avian residents, as well as migrating songbirds that could occur in the area that area adapted to urban environments.” The MND includes Mitigation Measure BIO-1, which states that “if construction occurs between February 1st and August 31st, a pre-construction clearance survey for nesting birds shall be conducted within three (3) days of the start of any vegetation removal or ground disturbing activities to ensure that no nesting birds will be disturbed during construction.” CDFW considers Mitigation Measure BIO-1 to be insufficient in scope and timing to reduce impacts to nesting birds to a level less than significant. CDFW is concerned about impacts to nesting birds including loss of nesting/foraging habitat and potential take from ground-disturbing activities and construction. Conducting work outside the peak nesting season is an important avoidance and minimization measure. CDFW also recommends the completion of nesting bird surveys regardless of the time of year to ensure that impacts to nesting birds are avoided. The timing of the nesting season varies greatly depending on several factors, such as bird species, weather conditions in any given year, and long-term climate changes (e.g., drought, warming, etc.). In response to warming, birds have been reported to breed earlier, thereby reducing temperatures that nests are exposed to during breeding and tracking shifts in availability of resources (Socolar et al., 20172).

CDFW staff have observed that climate change conditions may result in nesting bird season occurring earlier and later in the year than historical nesting season dates.

CDFW recommends that disturbance of occupied nests of migratory birds and raptors within the Project site and surrounding area be avoided any time birds are nesting onsite. CDFW therefore recommends the completion of nesting bird surveys regardless of the time of year to ensure compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to nesting and migratory birds.
2 Socolar JB, Epanchin PN, Beissinger SR and Tingley MW (2017). Phenological shifts conserve thermal niches.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(49): 12976-12981.

Comment 2
Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cathedral City
July 22, 2024

Page 5 ends

To support the Project in reducing impacts to nesting birds to a level less than significant, CDFW recommends that the City revise Mitigation Measure BIO-1 with the following additions in bold and removals in strikethrough:

Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Nesting Birds
Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than 3 days prior to vegetation removal or ground-disturbing activities. Pre-construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior.

The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre-construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on-site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance.

Nesting birds are protected pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code (Sections 3503, 3503.3, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code prohibit the take, possession, or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs). In order to protect migratory bird species, a nesting bird clearance survey shall be conducted prior to any ground disturbance or vegetation removal activities that may disrupt the birds during the nesting season. Consequently, if avian nesting behaviors are disrupted, such as nest abandonment and/or loss of reproductive effort, it is considered “take” and is potentially punishable by fines and/or imprisonment.

If construction occurs between February 1st and August 31st, a pre-construction clearance survey for nesting birds shall be conducted within three (3) days of the start of any vegetation removal or ground disturbing activities to ensure that no nesting birds will be disturbed during construction. The biologist conducting the clearance survey shall document a negative survey with a brief letter report indicating that no impacts to active avian nests will occur. If an active avian nest is discovered during the preconstruction clearance survey, construction activities shall stay outside of a nodisturbance buffer. The size of the no-disturbance buffer will be determined by the wildlife biologist and will depend on the level of noise and/or surrounding anthropogenic disturbances, line of sight between the nest and the construction activity, type and duration of construction activity, ambient noise, species habituation, and topographical barriers. These factors will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when developing Comment 2 Continued
Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cathedral City
July 22, 2024

Page 6 ends

buffer distances. Limits of construction to avoid an active nest will be established in the field with flagging, fencing, or other appropriate barriers; and construction personnel will be instructed on the sensitivity of nest areas. A biological monitor should be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by the construction activity. Once the young have fledged and left the nest, or the nest otherwise becomes inactive under natural conditions, construction activities within the buffer area can occur. 2) Burrowing Owl
Burrowing owl is a California Species of Special Concern. Take of individual burrowing owls and their nests is defined by Fish and Game Code section 86, and prohibited by sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513. Fish and Game Code section 3513 makes it unlawful to take or possess any migratory nongame bird except as provided by rules and regulations adopted by the Secretary of the Interior under provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq.). Take is defined in Fish and Game Code section 86 as “hunt, pursue, catch, capture or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture or kill.”
Permittees of the CVMSHCP must ensure that Covered Activities within their jurisdictions—both inside and outside Conservation Areas—do not result in the take of the burrowing owl individuals, nests, or eggs. Per Section 3.5.6 of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) Permit #2835-2008-001-06 for the CVMSHCP, “take outside of Conservation Areas will be consistent with sections 3503 and 3503.5 of the Fish and Game Code.” Adding further clarification, Section 3.5.6 of CDFW’s NCCP Permit indicates that “following all laws applicable to migratory birds (discussed below), the pairs or individuals will not be Taken, just the land around and including the burrows”, and “the HCP/NCCP does not authorize Take of nests and eggs as prohibited by Fish and Game Code sections 3503 and 3503.5 and therefore avoidance measures will have to be undertaken for all projects which have breeding burrowing owls present.” An activity that results in the take of burrowing owl individuals, nests, or eggs would be unlawful and would not be a Covered Activity under the CVMSHCP. Per Section 13.2 of the CVMSHCP Implementing Agreement, County and Cities’ obligations include, but are not limited to, taking “all necessary and appropriate actions, following applicable land use permit enforcement procedures and practices, to enforce the terms of project approvals for public and private projects, including compliance with the MSHCP, the Permits and this Agreement.” The City has an obligation under the CVMSHCP to ensure the Project does not result in the take of burrowing owl individuals, nests, and eggs.

Page 9 ends

of the project site, no burrowing owls or sign (i.e., pellets, feathers, castings, or whitewash) were observed during the field investigation. Several small mammal Comment 2 Continued
Comment 3
Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cathedral City
July 22, 2024

Page 7 ends

burrows that have the potential to provide suitable burrowing owl nesting habitat (>4 inches in diameter) were observed within the boundaries of the site. Based on this information, and as a result of current and historic on-site disturbances, and surrounding development, it was determined that burrowing owls do not have potential to occur, and no focused surveys are recommended.” Table D-1 of the Project’s Biological Assessment indicates that “the Project site provides line-of-sight opportunities favored by burrowing owls; however, no suitable burrows (>4 inches) were observed.” The MND and its supporting documents contain inconsistent information on the presence of suitable burrows for burrowing owls located within the Project site. Also, the MND and Biological Assessment lack a discussion of the methods used to conduct surveys for burrowing owl and if focused surveys, conducted independently of other surveys, were completed. CDFW recommends that a habitat assessment and focused surveys for burrowing owl are conducted independently of other biological survey activities. Given the MND’s lack of findings from a recent habitat assessment and focused surveys for burrowing owl following the guidelines in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation,3 the number of suitable and occupied burrows within the Project site and surrounding areas is unknown. CDFW recommends the MND is revised to include the findings from focused burrowing owl surveys following the guidelines in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation along with appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures.

Based on review of historical aerial and street imagery using Google Earth Pro, the Project site and surrounding open-space areas to the north contain sparce vegetation cover that is suitable nesting and foraging habitat for burrowing owl. CDFW notes that in California, preferred habitat for burrowing owl is generally typified by short, sparse vegetation with few shrubs,4 and that burrowing owls may occur in ruderal grassy fields, vacant lots, and pastures if the vegetation structure is suitable and there are useable burrows and foraging habitat proximity.5In addition, burrowing owls frequently move into disturbed areas prior to and during construction activities since they are adapted to highly modified habitats.6,7 Because the Project site contains suitable habitat for 3 California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 2012. Staff report on burrowing owl mitigation. State of California, Natural Resources Agency. Available for download at:
https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=83843&inline 4 Haug, E. A., B. A. Millsap, and M. S. Martell. 1993. Burrowing owl (Speotyto cunicularia), in A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and The American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, D.C., USA.
5 Gervais, J. A., D. K. Rosenberg, R. G. Anthony. 2003. Space use and pesticide exposure risk of male burrowing owls in an agricultural landscape. Journal of Wildlife Management 67: 155-164. 6 Chipman, E. D., N. E. McIntyre, R. E. Strauss, M. C. Wallace, J. D. Ray, and C. W. Boal. 2008. Effects of human land use on western burrowing owl foraging and activity budgets. Journal of Raptor Research 42(2): 87-98. 7 Coulombe, H. N. 1971. Behavior and population ecology of the Burrowing Owl, Speotyto cunicularia, in the Imperial Valley of California. Condor 73:162–176.

Comment 3 Continued
Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cathedral City
July 22, 2024

Page 8 ends

burrowing owl, and the number of suitable and occupied burrows within the Project site is uncertain, CDFW disagrees with the conclusion in the MND and Biological Assessment that focused burrowing owl surveys are not recommended. To support the Project in reducing impacts to burrowing owl to a level less than significant, CDFW recommends the City add the following mitigation measure to a revised MND:

Mitigation Measure BIO-[A]: Burrowing Owl Surveys
Suitable burrowing owl habitat has been confirmed on the site; therefore, focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012 or most recent version) prior to vegetation removal or ground-disturbing activities. If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project proponent shall begin coordination with CDFW and USFWS immediately, and shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance, minimization, mitigation, and monitoring actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow cannot be avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe minimization and relocation actions that will be implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow exclusion and closure should only be considered as a last resort, after all other options have been evaluated as exclusion is not in itself an avoidance, minimization, or mitigation method and has the possibility to result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable habitat available to owls along with proposed relocation actions.

The Project proponent shall implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following CDFW and USFWS review and approval.

Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project-related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities.

Comment 3 Continued
Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cathedral City
July 22, 2024

Page 9 ends

3) Artificial Nighttime Lighting
The proposed Project will result in new sources of artificial nighttime lighting, including “freestanding lights with a maximum height of 18 feet located around the parking lot areas, as well as building lights. All lighting would be shielded to prevent light spillover onto adjacent areas” (page 9 of the MND). The Project is located adjacent to openspace areas to the north and across Date Palm Drive to the west of the Project site— areas that provide suitable nesting, roosting, foraging, and refugia habitat for birds, migratory birds that fly at night, bats, and other nocturnal and crepuscular wildlife. The Project’s proposed artificial nighttime lighting has the potential to significantly and adversely affect wildlife in the open-space areas adjacent to the Project site. Artificial lighting alters ecological processes including, but not limited to, the temporal niches of species; the repair and recovery of physiological function; the measurement of time through interference with the detection of circadian and lunar and seasonal cycles; the detection of resources and natural enemies; and navigation. 8 Many species use
photoperiod cues for communication (e.g., bird song9), determining when to begin foraging,
10 behavioral thermoregulation,11 and migration.12 Phototaxis, a phenomenon that results in attraction and movement towards light, can disorient, entrap, and temporarily blind wildlife species that experience it.
14

Page 9 ends

onto adjacent areas”. While these plans for shielding artificial nighttime lighting support the Project in limiting lighting impacts to biological resources within areas surrounding the Project site, CDFW considers these measures insufficient in scope and timing to reduce impacts to a level less than significant. To support the City in avoiding or reducing impacts of artificial nighttime lighting on biological resources to less than significant, CDFW recommends the City add the following mitigation measure to a revised MND:

Mitigation Measure BIO-[B]: Artificial Nighttime Lighting Throughout construction and the lifetime operations of the Project, the City of Cathedral City and Project proponent shall eliminate all nonessential lighting 8 Gatson, K. J., Bennie, J., Davies, T., Hopkins, J. 2013. The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal. Biological Reviews, 88.4: 912-927. 9 Miller, M. W. 2006. Apparent effects of light pollution on singing behavior of American robins. The Condor 108:130– 139.
10 Stone, E. L., G. Jones, and S. Harris. 2009. Street lighting disturbs commuting bats. Current Biology 19:1123– 1127.
11 Beiswenger, R. E. 1977. Diet patterns of aggregative behavior in tadpoles of Bufo americanus, in relation to light and temperature. Ecology 58:98–108.
12 Longcore, T., and C. Rich. 2004. Ecological light pollution - Review. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:191–198.

Comment 4
Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cathedral City
July 22, 2024

Page 10 ends

throughout the Project area and avoid or limit the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active.

The City of Cathedral City and Project proponent shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward and directed away from surrounding open-space and agricultural areas, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent possible, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark-Sky Association standards at http://darksky.org/). The City of Cathedral City and Project proponent shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. 4) Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Salvage of Sand-Dependent Covered Species
Section 6.6.1 of the CVMSHCP (Obligations of Local Permittees) states that within and outside Conservation Areas “on parcels approved for Development, the Permittees shall encourage the opportunity to salvage Covered sand-dependent species in accordance with the Implementation Manual.” Page 10 of the Project’s Biological Assessment indicates that the “CVMSHCP identifies modeled habitat for Coachella Valley milk-vetch [(Astragalus lentigunosus)], Palm Springs pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris bangsi), fat-tailed horned lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii), Le Conte’s thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei), Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard (Uma inornata), and Coachella Valley round-tailed ground squirrel (Xerospermophilus tereticaudus chlorus) as occurring within the Project site.” Many of these species, including, but not limited to, Coachella Valley milk-vetch, Palm Springs pocket mouse, fat-tailed horned lizard, and Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard are sand-dependent Covered Species. To be consistent with the CVMSHCP, CDFW recommends that the City include in a revised MND the following mitigation measure:

Mitigation Measure BIO-[C]: Salvage of Sand-Dependent Covered Species Prior to vegetation removal or ground-disturbing activities, the City of Cathedral City will collaborate with the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission to plan and implement a salvage of sand-dependent Covered Species within the Project site.

Local Development Mitigation Fee
Section 5.2.1.1 of the CVMSHCP indicates that “local jurisdictions will impose a mitigation fee on new Development within the Plan Area that impacts vacant land containing Habitat for the Covered Species or any of the conserved natural communities in the Plan through adoption, or amendment of an existing fee ordinance.” The Project Comment 4 Continued
Comment 6
Comment 5
Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cathedral City
July 22, 2024

Page 11 ends

site contains CVMSHCP modeled habitat for several Covered Species, as discussed on page 10 of the Biological Assessment, and contains suitable habitat for burrowing owl; therefore, the City is required to impose a local development fee for the Project. To document this obligation, CDFW recommends the City add the following mitigation measure to a revised MND:

Mitigation Measure BIO-[D]: CVMSHCP Compliance
Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit, the City of Cathedral City shall ensure compliance with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) and its associated Implementing Agreement and shall ensure the collection of payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee and transfer of revenues to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission.
5) Landscaping

Page 8 ends

that are native and indigenous to California’s climatic conditions and require low and medium water use. The proposed trees would include various evergreen and deciduous trees, such as: California Fan Palms, Palo Verdes, Live Oaks, African Sumacs, Shoestring Acacias, Desert Willows, Crape Myrtles, and Ironwood trees which would be placed throughout the site, including all parking areas.” CDFW recommends incorporation of water-wise concepts in any Project landscape design plans. In particular, CDFW recommends xeriscaping with locally native California species and installing water-efficient and targeted irrigation systems (such as drip irrigation). Native plants support butterflies, birds, reptiles, amphibians, small mammals, bees, and other pollinators that evolved with those plants. More information on native plants suitable for the Project location and nearby nurseries is available at Calscape: https://calscape.org/.

Local water agencies/cities and resource conservation cities in your area may be able to provide information on plant nurseries that carry locally native species, and some facilities display drought-tolerant locally native species demonstration gardens.

Information on drought-tolerant landscaping and water-efficient irrigation systems is available on California’s Save our Water website: https://saveourwater.com/. CDFW also recommends that the MND include recommendations regarding landscaping from Section 4.0 of the CVMSHCP “Table 4-112: Coachella Valley Native Plants Recommended for Landscaping” (pp. 4-180 to 4-182; https://cvmshcp.org/plandocuments/).

ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
CEQA requires that information developed in environmental impact reports and negative declarations be incorporated into a database which may be used to make subsequent or supplemental environmental determinations. (Pub. Resources Code, § Comment 7
Comment 6 Continued
Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cathedral City
July 22, 2024

Page 12 ends

21003, subd. (e).) Accordingly, please report any special status species and natural communities detected during Project surveys to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). The CNNDB field survey form can be filled out and submitted online at the following link: https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Submitting-Data. The types of information reported to CNDDB can be found at the following link:
https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Plants-and-Animals.

ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FILING FEES
The Project, as proposed, would have an impact on fish and/or wildlife, and assessment of environmental document filing fees is necessary. Fees are payable upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the Lead Agency and serve to help defray the cost of environmental review by CDFW. Payment of the environmental document filing fee is required in order for the underlying Project approval to be operative, vested, and final. (Cal. Code Regs, tit. 14, § 753.5; Fish & G. Code, § 711.4; Pub. Resources Code, § 21089.)

CONCLUSION
CDFW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the MND to assist the City in identifying and mitigating Project impacts to biological resources. CDFW concludes that the MND does not adequately identify or mitigate the Project’s significant, or potentially significant, impacts to biological resources. CDFW recommends that revised and additional mitigation measures and analysis as described in this letter be added to a revised MND.

CDFW personnel are available for consultation regarding biological resources and strategies to avoid and minimize impacts. Questions regarding this letter or further coordination should be directed to Jacob Skaggs, Senior Environmental Scientist Specialist, at [email protected].

Sincerely,
for
Kim Freeburn
Environmental Program Manager
Attachment 1: MMRP for CDFW-Proposed Mitigation Measures ec:

Heather Brashear, Senior Environmental Scientist (Supervisor), CDFW Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cathedral City
July 22, 2024

Page 13 ends

[email protected]
Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse, Sacramento [email protected]
Vincent James, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
[email protected]
Peter Satin, Coachella Valley Conservation Commission
[email protected]
ATTACHMENT 1: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP) Mitigation Measures Timing and
Methods
Responsible
Parties
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Nesting Birds
Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys
shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no
more than 3 days prior to vegetation removal or
ground-disturbing activities. Pre-construction
surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect
evidence of nesting, including nest locations and
nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will
make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as
a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active
nests are found during the pre-construction nesting
bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an
appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground.

Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A
smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the
qualified biologist familiar with the nesting
phenology of the nesting species and based on nest
and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities
may not occur inside the established buffers, which
shall remain on-site until a qualified biologist
determines the young have fledged or the nest is no
longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the
established buffer distance shall be monitored daily
by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project
has been completed. The qualified biologist has the
Timing: No more
than 3 days prior
to vegetation
removal or
ground-disturbing
activities.

Methods: See
Mitigation
Measure
Implementation:

City of Cathedral City
and Project
proponent
Monitoring and
Reporting: City of
Cathedral City
Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cathedral City
July 22, 2024

Page 14 ends

authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance.

Mitigation Measure BIO-[A]: Burrowing Owl Surveys
Suitable burrowing owl habitat has been confirmed
on the site; therefore, focused burrowing owl surveys
shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according
to the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl
Mitigation (CDFG, 2012 or most recent version) prior
to vegetation removal or ground-disturbing activities.

If burrowing owls are detected during the focused
surveys, the qualified biologist and Project
proponent shall begin coordination with CDFW and
USFWS immediately, and shall prepare a Burrowing
Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review
and approval prior to commencing Project activities.

The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed
avoidance, minimization, mitigation, and monitoring
actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the
number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres
of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers
and other avoidance measures. If impacts to
occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow cannot be
avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe
minimization and relocation actions that will be
implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow
exclusion and closure should only be considered as
a last resort, after all other options have been
evaluated as exclusion is not in itself an avoidance,
minimization, or mitigation method and has the
possibility to result in take. If impacts to occupied
burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be
provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable
habitat available to owls along with proposed
relocation actions. The Project proponent shall
implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following CDFW
and USFWS review and approval.

Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be
conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of
Project-related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff
Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012 or
most recent version). Preconstruction surveys
should be performed by a qualified biologist
following the recommendations and guidelines
provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl
Timing: Focused
surveys: Prior to
vegetation
removal or
ground-disturbing
activities. Preconstruction
surveys: No less
than 14 days prior
to start of Projectrelated activities
and within 24
hours prior to
ground
disturbance.

Methods: See
Mitigation
Measure
Implementation:

City of Cathedral City
and Project
proponent
Monitoring and
Reporting: City of
Cathedral City
Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cathedral City
July 22, 2024

Page 15 ends

Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm
occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities
shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist
shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing
Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW and
USFWS for review and approval prior to commencing
Project activities.

Mitigation Measure BIO-[B]: Artificial Nighttime
Lighting
Throughout construction and the lifetime operations
of the Project, the City of Cathedral City and Project
proponent shall eliminate all nonessential lighting
throughout the Project area and avoid or limit the use
of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn
and dusk when many wildlife species are most active.

The City of Cathedral City and Project proponent
shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward and directed away from
surrounding open-space and agricultural areas,
reduced in intensity to the greatest extent possible,
and does not result in lighting trespass including
glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night
sky (see the International Dark-Sky Association
standards at http://darksky.org/). The City of
Cathedral City and Project proponent shall ensure
use of LED lighting with a correlated color
temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal
of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that
contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler.

Timing:

Throughout
construction and
the lifetime
operations of the
Project.

Methods: See
Mitigation
Measure
Implementation:

City of Cathedral City
and Project
proponent
Monitoring and
Reporting: City of
Cathedral City
Mitigation Measure BIO-[C]: Salvage of SandDependent Covered Species Prior to vegetation removal or ground-disturbing
activities, the City of Cathedral City will collaborate with the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission
to plan and implement a salvage of sand-dependent
Covered Species within the Project site
Timing: Prior to
vegetation
removal of grounddisturbing
activities
Methods: See
Mitigation
Measure
Implementation:

City of Cathedral City
and Project
proponent
Monitoring and
Reporting: City of
Cathedral City
Mitigation Measure BIO-[D]: CVMSHCP Compliance
Prior to construction and issuance of any grading
permit, the City of Cathedral City shall ensure
compliance with the Coachella Valley Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) and
its associated Implementing Agreement and shall
ensure the collection of payment of the CVMSHCP
Timing: Prior to
construction and
issuance of any
grading permit
Implementation:

City of Cathedral City
and Project
proponent
Monitoring and
Reporting: City of
Cathedral City
Sandra Molina, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development City of Cathedral City
July 22, 2024

Page 16 ends

Local Development Mitigation Fee and transfer of
revenues to the Coachella Valley Conservation
Commission.

Methods: See
Mitigation
Measure

ATTACHEMNT A
The Altum Group 3 Response to Comments
Comment 1: CDFW has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species (i.e., biological resources). CDFW offers the comments and recommendations below to assist the City in adequately identifying and/or mitigating the Project’s significant, or potentially significant, direct and indirect impacts on fish and wildlife (biological) resources. The MND has not adequately identified and disclosed the Project’s impacts (i.e., direct, indirect, and cumulative) on biological resources and whether those impacts are reduced to less than significant.

CDFW’s comments and recommendations on the MND are explained in greater detail below and summarized here. CDFW is concerned that the MND does not adequately identify or mitigate the Project’s significant, or potentially significant, impacts to biological resources. CDFW requests that additional information and analyses be added to a revised MND, along with avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures that avoid or reduce impacts to less than significant.

Response: This comment is noted. The ISMND has been revised to include the mitigation measures recommended in this letter by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) as MM BIO-1 through BIO-5.

Comment 2: Page 5 of the Project’s Habitat Assessment and CVMSHCP Consistency Analysis (Biological Assessment) indicates that the “project site [and] surrounding area have the potential to provide suitable nesting habitat for year-round and seasonal avian residents, as well as migrating songbirds that could occur in the area that area adapted to urban environments.” The MND includes Mitigation Measure BIO1, which states that “if construction occurs between February 1st and August 31st, a pre-construction clearance survey for nesting birds shall be conducted within three (3) days of the start of any vegetation removal or ground disturbing activities to ensure that no nesting birds will be disturbed during construction.” CDFW considers Mitigation Measure BIO-1 to be insufficient in scope and timing to reduce impacts to nesting birds to a level less than significant. CDFW is concerned about impacts to nesting birds including loss of nesting/foraging habitat and potential take from ground-disturbing activities and construction. Conducting work outside the peak nesting season is an important avoidance and minimization measure. CDFW also recommends the completion of nesting bird surveys regardless of the time of year to ensure that impacts to nesting birds are avoided. The timing of the nesting season varies greatly depending on several factors, such as bird species, weather conditions in any given year, and longterm climate changes (e.g., drought, warming, etc.). In response to warming, birds have been reported to breed earlier, thereby reducing temperatures that nests are exposed to during breeding and tracking shifts in availability of resources (Socolar et al., 20172). CDFW staff have observed that climate change conditions may result in nesting bird season occurring earlier and later in the year than historical nesting season dates. CDFW recommends that disturbance of occupied nests of migratory birds and raptors within the Project site and surrounding area be avoided any time birds are nesting on-site. CDFW therefore recommends the completion of nesting bird surveys regardless of the time of year to ensure compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to nesting and migratory birds.

To support the Project in reducing impacts to nesting birds to a level less than significant, CDFW recommends that the City revise Mitigation Measure BIO-1 with the following additions in bold and removals in strikethrough:

ATTACHMENT A
Rosemount Storage Project 4 Response to Comments
Response: As suggested by CDFW, the ISMND has been updated to include a revised mitigation measure for nesting birds as BIO-1.

BIO-1: Nesting Birds
Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than 3 days prior to vegetation removal or ground-disturbing activities. Pre-construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior.

The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre-construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on-site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance.

Comment 3: Page 9 of the Project’s Biological Assessment states that “despite a systematic search of the project site, no burrowing owls or sign (i.e., pellets, feathers, castings, or whitewash) were observed during the field investigation. Several small mammal burrows that have the potential to provide suitable burrowing owl nesting habitat (>4 inches in diameter) were observed within the boundaries of the site.

Based on this information, and as a result of current and historic on-site disturbances, and surrounding development, it was determined that burrowing owls do not have potential to occur, and no focused surveys are recommended.” Table D-1 of the Project’s Biological Assessment indicates that “the Project site provides line-of-sight opportunities favored by burrowing owls; however, no suitable burrows (>4 inches) were observed.” The MND and its supporting documents contain inconsistent information on the presence of suitable burrows for burrowing owls located within the Project site. Also, the MND and Biological Assessment lack a discussion of the methods used to conduct surveys for burrowing owl and if focused surveys, conducted independently of other surveys, were completed. CDFW recommends that a habitat assessment and focused surveys for burrowing owl are conducted independently of other biological survey activities. Given the MND’s lack of findings from a recent habitat assessment and focused surveys for burrowing owl following the guidelines in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation,3 the number of suitable and occupied burrows within the Project site and surrounding areas is unknown. CDFW recommends the MND is revised to include the findings from focused burrowing owl surveys following the guidelines in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation along with appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures.

Based on review of historical aerial and street imagery using Google Earth Pro, the Project site and surrounding open-space areas to the north contain sparce vegetation cover that is suitable nesting and foraging habitat for burrowing owl. CDFW notes that in California, preferred habitat for burrowing owl is generally typified by short, sparse vegetation with few shrubs,4 and that burrowing owls may occur in ruderal grassy fields, vacant lots, and pastures if the vegetation structure is suitable and there are useable burrows and foraging habitat proximity.5 In addition, burrowing owls frequently move into disturbed areas prior to and during construction activities since they are adapted to highly modified habitat. Because

ATTACHMENT A
The Altum Group 5 Response to Comments
the Project site contains suitable habitat for burrowing owl, and the number of suitable and occupied burrows within the Project site is uncertain, CDFW disagrees with the conclusion in the MND and Biological Assessment that focused burrowing owl surveys are not recommended. To support the Project in reducing impacts to burrowing owl to a level less than significant, CDFW recommends the City add the following mitigation measure to a revised MND:

Response: As suggested by CDFW, the ISMND has been updated to include a revised mitigation measure for burrowing owls as BIO-2.

BIO-2: Burrowing Owl Surveys: Suitable burrowing owl habitat has been confirmed on the site; therefore, focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012 or most recent version) prior to vegetation removal or grounddisturbing activities. If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project proponent shall begin coordination with CDFW and USFWS immediately, and shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance, minimization, mitigation, and monitoring actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow cannot be avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe minimization and relocation actions that will be implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow exclusion and closure should only be considered as a last resort, after all other options have been evaluated as exclusion is not in itself an avoidance, minimization, or mitigation method and has the possibility to result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable habitat available to owls along with proposed relocation actions. The Project proponent shall implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following CDFW and USFWS review and approval.

Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project-related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities.

Comment 4: Artificial Nighttime Lighting

Page 9 ends

areas”. While these plans for shielding artificial nighttime lighting support the Project in limiting lighting impacts to biological resources within areas surrounding the Project site, CDFW considers these measures insufficient in scope and timing to reduce impacts to a level less than significant. To support the City in avoiding or reducing impacts of artificial nighttime lighting on biological resources to less than significant, CDFW recommends the City add the following mitigation measure to a revised MND:

ATTACHMENT A
Rosemount Storage Project 6 Response to Comments
Response: As suggested by CDFW, the ISMND has been updated to include a mitigation measure for artificial nighttime light as BIO-3.

Measure BIO-3: Artificial Nighttime Lighting
Throughout construction and the lifetime operations of the Project, the City of Cathedral City and Project proponent shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and avoid or limit the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active.

The City of Cathedral City and Project proponent shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward and directed away from surrounding open-space and agricultural areas, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent possible, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark-Sky Association standards at http://darksky.org/). The City of Cathedral City and Project proponent shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler.

Comment 5: Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Salvage of Sand-Dependent Covered Species
Section 6.6.1 of the CVMSHCP (Obligations of Local Permittees) states that within and outside Conservation Areas “on parcels approved for Development, the Permittees shall encourage the opportunity to salvage Covered sand-dependent species in accordance with the Implementation Manual.”

Page 10 ends

for Coachella Valley milk-vetch [(Astragalus lentigunosus)], Palm Springs pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris bangsi), fat-tailed horned lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii), Le Conte’s thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei), Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard (Uma inornata), and Coachella Valley round-tailed ground squirrel (Xerospermophilus tereticaudus chlorus) as occurring within the Project site.” Many of these species, including, but not limited to, Coachella Valley milk-vetch, Palm Springs pocket mouse, fat-tailed horned lizard, and Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard are sand-dependent Covered Species. To be consistent with the CVMSHCP, CDFW recommends that the City include in a revised MND the following mitigation measure:

Response: As suggested by CDFW, the ISMND has been updated to include mitigation measure for Salvage Sand-Dependent Covered Species as BIO-4.

BIO-4: Salvage of Sand-Dependent Covered Species
Prior to vegetation removal or ground-disturbing activities, the City of Cathedral City will collaborate with the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission to plan and implement a salvage of sand-dependent Covered Species within the Project site.

Comment 6: Local Development Mitigation Fee
Section 5.2.1.1 of the CVMSHCP indicates that “local jurisdictions will impose a mitigation fee on new Development within the Plan Area that impacts vacant land containing Habitat for the Covered Species or any of the conserved natural communities in the Plan through adoption, or amendment of an existing fee ordinance.” The Project site contains CVMSHCP modeled habitat for several Covered Species, as discussed on page 10 of the Biological Assessment, and contains suitable habitat for burrowing owl; therefore, the

ATTACHMENT A
The Altum Group 7 Response to Comments
City is required to impose a local development fee for the Project. To document this obligation, CDFW recommends the City add the following mitigation measure to a revised MND:

Response: The ISMND has been updated to include this mitigation measure as BIO-5.

BIO-5: CVMSHCP Compliance
Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit, the City of Cathedral City shall ensure compliance with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) and its associated Implementing Agreement and shall ensure the collection of payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee and transfer of revenues to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission.

Comment 7: Landscaping

Page 8 ends

and indigenous to California’s climatic conditions and require low and medium water use. The proposed trees would include various evergreen and deciduous trees, such as: California Fan Palms, Palo Verdes, Live Oaks, African Sumacs, Shoestring Acacias, Desert Willows, Crape Myrtles, and Ironwood trees which would be placed throughout the site, including all parking areas.” CDFW recommends incorporation of water-wise concepts in any Project landscape design plans. In particular, CDFW recommends xeriscaping with locally native California species and installing water-efficient and targeted irrigation systems (such as drip irrigation). Native plants support butterflies, birds, reptiles, amphibians, small mammals, bees, and other pollinators that evolved with those plants. More information on native plants suitable for the Project location and nearby nurseries is available at Calscape: https://calscape.org/. Local water agencies/cities and resource conservation cities in your area may be able to provide information on plant nurseries that carry locally native species, and some facilities display drought-tolerant locally native species demonstration gardens. Information on drought-tolerant landscaping and water-efficient irrigation systems is available on California’s Save our Water website: https://saveourwater.com/. CDFW also recommends that the MND include recommendations regarding landscaping from Section 4.0 of the CVMSHCP “Table 4-112: Coachella Valley Native Plants Recommended for Landscaping” (pp. 4-180 to 4- 182; https://cvmshcp.org/plan-documents/).

Response: Comment noted. The landscaping has been designed to be drought tolerant and complies with Coachella Valley Water District’s ordinance for water efficient landscape and irrigation system design criteria. Page 8 Section on Landscaping, has been updated to include the recommended language.

ATTACHMENT B
Rosemount Storage Project 8 Response to Comments
Attachment B
Peerless at Mammoth LLC Comment Letter and Response to
Comments.

PEERLESS AT MAMMOTH, LLC
Subsidiary of Peerless Land & Water Co., Inc.
10707 Northridge Court, Holland, Michigan 49423
(616) 889-7645 [email protected]
July 22, 2024
Sandra Molina
Director of Community and Economic Development
68700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero
Cathedral City, California 92234
Email: [email protected]
RE: Rosemount Storage Project, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Ms. Molina:

Peerless at Mammoth, LLC, respectfully disagrees with the findings of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared by The Altum Group for the proposed Rosemount Storage project. We believe the preparers of the IS/MND incorporated a substantial number of misleading statements to achieve a Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporate environmental evaluation that this Initial Study Concluded. We do not believe the project applicant, Three Mile Hollow, has the right to complete the Rosemount Storage project as detailed in the IS/MND per the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99 58, and the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan. We believe, if the City changes the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99 58, and the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, the City is effectively revoking the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE. Due to the Rosemount Storage project’s failure to reduce proposed Project environmental impacts to levels below significance thresholds, we believe the project as presented should be denied any approvals.

Peerless at Mammoth, LLC, an adjacent property owner, was never contacted by any of the Report Preparers identified on page 143 of the IS/MND with respect to the preparation of the IS/MND.

This lack of transparency begs the question as to who the Report Preparers contacted to prepare the IS/MND.

Per the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, and the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE, all of parcels 1-9 fall within the boundaries of Planning Unit 1 within the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, and the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE. Planning Unit 1, Planning Unit 2, and Planning Unit 3, of the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, and the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, clearly states under page 6, section 7. PROHIBITED USES, subsection D. “auctions, wholesale business, warehouses and storage buildings”. The Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, and the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE were part of the escrow documents and purchasing agreement when Peerless at Mammoth, LLC, acquired the property located at 30-900 Date palm Drive. If the City changes the Comment 1
Comment 2
Comment 3
Comment 4
Comment 5
aforementioned conditions, the City will make a Significant environmental and financial Impact on all the surrounding properties of the Rosemount Storage project.

Section 2.1.2 Existing Project Site of the IS/MND, describes the site without mentioning Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 have preexisting driveways, that were required by the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, and the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan. These driveways are obvious examples of how Parcel 1-9 were to be integrated as one project and not individual properties.

Approving section 2.1.2 Existing Project Site of the IS/MND, the City is effectively reneging the condition of the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, Page 7, section 3. ACCESS AND CIRCULATION, which states, “The site design intentionally restricts access to Date Palm Drive to facilitate the continued movement of community and regional traffic with minimum "friction" from the development along this frontage.”
By approving the construction of the storage facility by the City of Cathedral City in the proposed location, the City will have revoked the easements of Ingress, Egress, Parking, Access, Common Area, and Free Access, created by, dedicated by, and granted by the Developer under the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE. Under ARTICLE 4, section

4.3 of the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE, Permanency of Certain Easements, “The easements created pursuant to Sections 4.1 (Ingress, Egress, Parking, Access, Common Area, and Free Access) shall be perpetual and shall survive the termination of this Declaration. This implies the City may not change COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE, which cover Parcels 1-9.

Additionally, the Creation of Planning Unit four (4) as stated under Chapter 2 Project Description, paragraph 1, is an attempt by the preparers to renege on the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, and revoke the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE. The preparers state no less than 48 times, “The project will also include a Specific Plan Amendment (No. 99-58A) which will create Planning Unit four (4) with an area of 7.16 acres for this proposed project and provide corresponding development standards.

Planning Unit four (4) will be separated from Planning Unit One (1) which will remain with an area of 2.11 acres.” If the City changes the aforementioned conditions, the City will make a Significant environmental and financial Impact on all the surrounding properties of the Rosemount Storage project.

Under ARTICLE 2, section 2.6 of the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE, Allowable Gross Building Area/Maximum Building Height, “No building or combination of buildings will at any time be constructed or maintained on, under, or above the surface of any Parcel which exceeds the Allowable Gross Square Feet or Maximum Building Height for such Parcel.

The respective Allowable Gross Square Feet and Maximum Building Height for each Parcel are set forth below:

PARCEL ALLOWABLE GROSS

SQUARE FEET

MAXIMUM BUILDING
HEIGHT

MAXIMUM BUILDING
(special features, e.g.
towers etc.)
Comment 6
Comment 7
Parcel 1 46,270 25’ 32’
Parcel 2 45,329 25’ 32’
Parcel 3 29,380 25’ 32’
Parcel 4 32,431 25’ 32’
Parcel 5 34,428 25’ 32’
Parcel 6 31,567 25’ 32’
Parcel 7 30,754 25’ 32’
Parcel 8 76,318 25’ 32’
Parcel 9 71,983 25’ 32’
Clearly the proposed plans are a Significant change from the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, and revoke the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE; therefore, the changes do not qualify under the IS/MND’s levels below significance thresholds.

Within the IS/MND, the preparers attempt no less than 27 times to entice the City’s decision by connecting the potential of additional buildings in Phase 2, ranging from 2,413-50,000 square feet.

Under section 2.2 Proposed Project Characteristics, paragraph 4, the preparers clearly state, “The Design Review only includes the indoor mini-storage facility, underground retention basin, and a minimum of 12 spaces for on-site parking.” The preparers clearly have no intention of constructing any of the Phase 2 facilities, and only want to construct a mini-storage facility not in compliance with the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, and revoke the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE.

Under section 2.2.5 Employment, the preparers state, “Project operation is estimated to generate 150 full-time and part-time employees.” A mini-storage facility, as proposed, will employee 5 fulltime and part-time employees at best; otherwise, there would be a need for far more than 12 parking spaces for the mini-storage facility as identified by the preparers.

The approval the IS/MND will violate the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, and revoke the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE. The approval of the IS/MND will irrevocably damage the value of Peerless at Mammoth, LLC’s assets located at 30-900 Date Palm Drive. For the aforementioned reasons, we request that the City of Cathedral City deny the design of the Rosemount Storage Project and the IS/MND as presented.

Thank you,
W. Scott Zastrow, P.E.

PEERLESS AT MAMMOTH, LLC
10707 Northridge Court
Holland, Michigan 49423
(616) 889-7645
[email protected]
Comment 8
Comment 9
Comment 10
Comment 11

ATTACHMENT B
Rosemount Storage Project 9 Response to Comments
Comment 1: Peerless at Mammoth, LLC, respectfully disagrees with the findings of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared by The Altum Group for the proposed Rosemount Storage project. We believe the preparers of the IS/MND incorporated a substantial number of misleading statements to achieve a Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporate environmental evaluation that this Initial Study Concluded. We do not believe the project applicant, Three Mile Hollow, has the right to complete the Rosemount Storage project as detailed in the IS/MND per the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99 58, and the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan. We believe, if the City changes the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99 58, and the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, the City is effectively revoking the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE. Due to the Rosemount Storage project’s failure to reduce proposed Project environmental impacts to levels below significance thresholds, we believe the project as presented should be denied any approvals.

Response:

Technical studies were conducted and determined that no mitigation was required because the Project is already at a level of less than significant or no impact. Those sections where it was found that the project would require the implementation of mitigation measures to reduce the level of impact to less than significant have listed mitigation measures.

The mitigation measures in the Biological Resources section of the ISMND have been updated to more adequately address impacts and mitigation measures to nesting birds, burrowing owls, artificial nighttime light, and City fees.

This comment does not identify a specific concern with the adequacy of the Initial Study or raise an issue or comment specifically related to the Initial Study’s environmental analysis under CEQA. Therefore, no further response is warranted. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(a) requires that a lead agency only evaluate and respond to comments raised on environmental issues.

Comment 2: Peerless at Mammoth, LLC, an adjacent property owner, was never contacted by any of the Report Preparers identified on page 143 of the IS/MND with respect to the preparation of the IS/MND.

This lack of transparency begs the question as to who the Report Preparers contacted to prepare the IS/MND.

Response: There is no requirement under CEQA that states the adjacent property owners need to be notified before a proposed Project becomes public knowledge. The lead agency prepared a Notice of Completion and circulated the ISMND from July 2nd-22nd, 2024 per section 15073 of the CEQA guidelines.

Comment 3: Planning Unit 1, Planning Unit 2, and Planning Unit 3, of the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99- 58, and the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, clearly states under page 6, section 7.

PROHIBITED USES, subsection D. “auctions, wholesale business, warehouses and storage buildings”.

Response:

The Specific Plan is being amended to allow storage as a use.

Regarding the proposed development of a self-storage facility on Parcels 3, 4, and 9, the CC&R’s do not prohibit such a use. The Applicant as Consenting Owner under the CC&R’s has the power under CC&R’s

ATTACHMENT B
Rosemount Storage Project 10 Response to Comments
Section 3.1 to authorize a commercial usage not explicitly described as a permitted use in the CC&Rs, so long as it is not expressly prohibited and is otherwise in compliance with zoning and City ordinances.

Storage is not expressly prohibited in the CC&R’s. The CC&R’s allow for uses that are common in shopping centers in the same geographic area. Self-storage facilities are common in shopping centers in Cathedral City and throughout the Coachella Valley, including an existing Storquest facility located near the project site at 32-500 Date Palm Drive in Cathedral City.

Comment 4: The Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, and the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE were part of the escrow documents and purchasing agreement when Peerless at Mammoth, LLC, acquired the property located at 30-900 Date palm Drive.

Response: The Uptown Village Specific Plan acts as the zoning for the property, which can always be amended by appropriate City action.

Comment 5: If the City changes the aforementioned conditions, the City will make a Significant environmental and financial Impact on all the surrounding properties of the Rosemount Storage project.

Response: The IS/MND addresses all potential environmental impacts of the proposed amendment to the Uptown Village Specific Plan. The uptown village Specific Plan acts as the zoning for the property, which can be amended by appropriate City action. The purpose of the amendment is to foster development of the vacant land within the Uptown Village Specific Plan, which has remained undeveloped for decades.

This will drive more traffic to the commercial area, creating economic benefit.

Comment 6: Section 2.1.2 Existing Project Site of the IS/MND, describes the site without mentioning Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 have preexisting driveways, that were required by the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, and the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan. These driveways are obvious examples of how Parcel 1-9 were to be integrated as one project and not individual properties. Approving section 2.1.2 Existing Project Site of the IS/MND, the City is effectively reneging the condition of the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, Page 7, section 3. ACCESS AND CIRCULATION, which states, “The site design intentionally restricts access to Date Palm Drive to facilitate the continued movement of community and regional traffic with minimum "friction" from the development along this frontage.” By approving the construction of the storage facility by the City of Cathedral City in the proposed location, the City will have revoked the easements of Ingress, Egress, Parking, Access, Common Area, and Free Access, created by, dedicated by, and granted by the Developer under the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE. Under ARTICLE 4, section 4.3 of the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE, Permanency of Certain Easements, “The easements created pursuant to Sections

4.1 (Ingress, Egress, Parking, Access, Common Area, and Free Access) shall be perpetual and shall survive the termination of this Declaration. This implies the City may not change COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE, which cover Parcels 1-9.

Response: Regarding CC&R’s protocols for modifications to common areas and infrastructure, including the role and authority of any committees involved, the Applicant as the Consenting Owner has the authority to do that without the consent of any owner pursuant to the last paragraph of Section 2.2 and the easements in Section 4.1, so long as the work is not done on another owner’s Parcel. Section 2.2 of the CC&R’s allows the Project Applicant (as the “Consenting Owner”) to relocate the common areas and improvements so long as the main drive isles as depicted on the Site Plan (within the CC&R’s) are not

ATTACHMENT B
The Altum Group 11 Response to Comments
adversely affected. The CC&R’s Site Plan only depicts the location and boundaries of the east/west Main Drive Isle located between Parcels 4 and 5 and between Parcels 8 and 9, all of which are owned by the Project applicant. It does not depict the location or boundaries of the north/south Main Drive Isle through Parcels 3 through 7, except with the words “Main Drive Isle” in that general area. That would allow the Applicant to relocate the Main Drive Isles on Parcels 3 – 9 so long as that does not “adversely affect” the Main Drive Isles and there is no negative impact on the access for Parcels 1 and 2.

Comment 7: Additionally, the Creation of Planning Unit four (4) as stated under Chapter 2 Project Description, paragraph 1, is an attempt by the preparers to renege on the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, and revoke the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE. The preparers state no less than 48 times, “The project will also include a Specific Plan Amendment (No. 99-58A) which will create Planning Unit four (4) with an area of

7.16 acres for this proposed project and provide corresponding development standards. Planning Unit four (4) will be separated from Planning Unit One (1) which will remain with an area of 2.11 acres.” If the City changes the aforementioned conditions, the City will make a Significant environmental and financial Impact on all the surrounding properties of the Rosemount Storage project. Under ARTICLE 2, section 2.6 of the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE, Allowable Gross Building Area/Maximum Building Height, “No building or combination of buildings will at any time be constructed or maintained on, under, or above the surface of any Parcel which exceeds the Allowable Gross Square Feet or Maximum Building Height for such Parcel. The respective Allowable Gross Square Feet and Maximum Building Height for each Parcel are set forth below:

Response: The CC&R’s do not prohibit and in fact allow for the combining of parcels to accommodate combined gross building areas. Section 1.19 of the CC&R’s, the definition of “Parcel”, and Section 1.27 defining “Site Plan”, contemplates the right to reconfigure Parcels such as “by lot line adjustment, or otherwise.” Here, the resulting combined parcels do not exceed the total allowable square footages of the combined Parcels.

Comment 8: Clearly the proposed plans are a Significant change from the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99-58, the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, and revoke the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE; therefore, the changes do not qualify under the IS/MND’s levels below significance thresholds.

Response: The Specific Plan is subject to modification. The CC&R’s do not prohibit and in fact allow for the combining of parcels to accommodate combined gross building areas. Section 1.19 of the CC&R’s, the definition of “Parcel”, and Section 1.27 defining “Site Plan”, contemplates the right to reconfigure Parcels such as “by lot line adjustment, or otherwise.” Here, the resulting combined parcels do not exceed the total allowable square footages of the combined Parcels.

Comment 9: Within the IS/MND, the preparers attempt no less than 27 times to entice the City’s decision by connecting the potential of additional buildings in Phase 2, ranging from 2,413-50,000 square feet.

Under section 2.2 Proposed Project Characteristics, paragraph 4, the preparers clearly state, “The Design Review only includes the indoor mini-storage facility, underground retention basin, and a minimum of 12 spaces for on-site parking.”

ATTACHMENT B
Rosemount Storage Project 12 Response to Comments
Response: The Specific Plan is being amended to help foster development of the vacant land within the Uptown Village Specific Plan, which has remained vacant for decades. The self-storage facility is proceeding with design review as a first phase for the build-out of the remainder of the Specific Plan area.

Comment 10: The preparers clearly have no intention of constructing any of the Phase 2 facilities, and only want to construct a mini-storage facility not in compliance with the Cathedral City’s Specific Plan 99- 58, the Cathedral City’s Uptown Village Specific Plan, and revoke the COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR UPTOWN VILLAGE.

Response: The comment is an unsubstantiated opinion and is contrary to the efforts of the Applicant, which has already brought potential uses of the remaining land to the City for possible development. The Project is consistent with the propose Specific Plan Amendment and plans for the future build out of the site.

Comment 11: Under section 2.2.5 Employment, the preparers state, “Project operation is estimated to generate 150 full-time and part-time employees.” A mini-storage facility, as proposed, will employee 5 full-time and part-time employees at best; otherwise, there would be a need for far more than 12 parking spaces for the mini-storage facility as identified by the preparers.

Response: The IS/MND contemplates the maximum number of employees that could be associated with all possible uses of the vacant land in order to study the maximum impacts by such uses.

ATTACHMENT C
The Altum Group 13 Response to Comments
Attachment C
Email Comment Letter from Citizen and Response to Comment 7/26/24, 3:03 PM Uptown Village - Madeline Luke - Outlook 1/1
Uptown Village
carl pedersen <[email protected]>
Sun 7/7/2024 12:00 PM
To: Sandra Molina <[email protected]>
As a homeowner on Sierra Place, I am concerned about the opening of Rosemount Road as a thru street to Date Palm Drive. The increase in traffic on Rosemount Road will definitely impact the property owners not only on Sierra Place but on Rosemount Road as well. This will become the "short cut" to both of the schools located in our neighborhood. Environmental consideration must be taken into account.

With the abundance of vacant commercial property along Date Palm Drive, it is questionable if either scenario I or scenario 2 will ever be built other than the storage facility.

The mitigated negative declaration also refers to a Wren Residential development on the Northeast corner of Date Palm Drive and Rosemount Road. It certainly would be nice if the property owners of the impacted area were informed of the proposed development.

If the plan is approved, there is no discussion as to the extension of Rosemount Road terminus to the property footage to be undertaken by the developer of the Date Palm Storage facility. Is the city responsible or who will bear the cost?
Sincerely
Carl Pedersen
30640 Sierra Place
Response: Comment noted. The Traffic Assessment and Vehicle Miles Traveled analysis are included as Appendix F Traffic Analysis in the ISMND. The Traffic Analysis and Vehicle Miles analysis found that there will be no substantial environmental impacts due to the build out of Rosemount Road. Traffic-related impacts have been mitigated to a less than significant levels.

Cost associated with the extension of Rosemount Road will be a shared cost between the developer of the balance of vacant land within Planning Unit 4 of the Uptown Village Specific Plan and the developer of the parcel immediately North of Rosemount Road.

ATTACHMENT D
Rosemount Storage Project 14 Response to Comments
Attachment D
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District
JASON E. UHLEY 1995 MARKET STREET
General Manager-Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
951.955.1200
951.788.9965 FAX
www.rcflood.org

RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL

AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
256982
July 10, 2024
City of Cathedral City
Planning Division
68-700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero
Cathedral City, CA 92234-7031
Attention: Sandra Molina Re: SP Amendment 98-55-A (Uptown Village Specific Plan) DR 23-003, APNs 670-110-048,
670-110-049, 670-110-050, 670-110-051,
670-110-052, 670-110-053 and 670-110-056
The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check City land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases.

District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided.

The District's review is based on the above-referenced project transmittal, received July 1, 2024. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail, and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue:
☒ This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. The project is located within Coachella Valley Water District's (CVWD) jurisdiction. CVWD is the responsible agency to review and comment on regional flood control drainage systems within their jurisdictional limits.
☐ This project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, . The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request by the City. The Project Applicant shall enter into a cooperative agreement establishing the terms and conditions of inspection, operation, and maintenance with the District and any other maintenance partners. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. All regulatory permits (and all documents pertaining thereto, e.g., Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plans, Conservation Plans/Easements) that are to be secured by the Applicant for both facility construction and maintenance shall be submitted to the District for review. The regulatory permits' terms and conditions shall be approved by the District prior to improvement plan approval, map recordation, or finalization of the regulatory permits. There shall be no unreasonable constraint upon the District's ability to operate and maintain the flood control facility(ies) to protect public health and safety.
☐ This project proposes channels, storm drains larger than 36 inches in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension a District's facility, the District would Comment 1
City of Cathedral City -2 - July 10, 2024
Re: SP Amendment 98-55-A (Uptown Village
Specific Plan) DR 23-003, APNs 670-110-048, 256982
670-110-049, 670-110-050, 670-110-051,
670-110-052, 670-110-053 and 670-110-056
consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request by the City. The Project Applicant shall enter into a cooperative agreement establishing the terms and conditions of inspection, operation, and maintenance with the District and any other maintenance partners. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. The regulatory permits' terms and conditions shall be approved by the District prior to improvement plan approval, map recordation, or finalization of the regulatory permits. There shall be no unreasonable constraint upon the District's ability to operate and maintain the flood control facility(ies) to protect public health and safety. ☐ An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities, namely, ____________________. If a proposed storm drain connection exceeds the hydraulic performance of the existing drainage facilities, mitigation will be required. For further information, contact the District's Encroachment Permit Section at 951.955.1266. ☐ The District's previous comments are still valid.

GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.

If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.

The project proponent shall bear the responsibility for complying with all applicable mitigation measures defined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document (i.e., Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Environmental Impact Report) and/or Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, if a CEQA document was prepared for the project. The project proponent shall also bear the responsibility for complying with all other federal, state, and local environmental rules and regulations that may apply.

If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit.

Very truly yours,

AMY MCNEILL
Engineering Project Manager
EM:blj
Comment 2
Comment 3

ATTACHMENT D
The Altum Group 15 Response to Comments
Comment 1: This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. The project is located within Coachella Valley Water District's (CVWD) jurisdiction. CVWD is the responsible agency to review and comment on regional flood control drainage systems within their jurisdictional limits.

Response: This comment has been noted.

Comment 2: If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.

Response: The proposed project is not within a FEMA mapped floodplain and is not subject to FEMA review.

Comment 3: If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit.

Response: The project site does not contain any natural watercourses or mapped floodplains. Therefore, the requirement to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence indicating exemption from these requirements does not apply to this project.

ATTACHMENT E
Rosemount Storage Project 16 Response to Comments
Attachment E
Airport Land Use Commission Email
SPA98-55-A
Vega, Jaqueline <[email protected]>
Tue 7/16/2024 10:51 AM
To:Sandra Molina <[email protected]>
1 attachments (451 KB)
ALUC application 5-13-24.pdf;
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Hello Sandra,
Thank you for transmitting the above referenced project to ALUC for review. Please note that the proposed project is located within zone E of Palm Springs AIA, and review by ALUC is required because although the City is consistent with the compatibility plan for Palm Springs, the project proposes a legislative actions.

Here is an application.

Should you have any questions, please contact me.

Jackie Vega
Urban Regional Planner II
Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure.

If you are not the author's intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete all copies, both electronic and printed, and contact the author immediately.

County of Riverside California
7/30/24, 9:13 AM SPA98-55-A - Madeline Luke - Outlook
about:blank?windowId=SecondaryReadingPane1 1/1
Response: The proposed project is located within Zone E of the Palm Springs Airport Influence Area (AIA) and ALUC review is required due to the legislative actions proposed. An ALUC application has been submitted for this project. The case number for this application is ZAP1105PS24. The proposed uses, buildings height, and density is consistent with the allowable standards for Zone E. An application is currently in review, and a hearing is scheduled for August 8th, 2024.

Mitigation Monitoring
Reporting Program
Rosemount Storage Project
Lead Agency:

City of Cathedral City
68700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero
Cathedral City, CA 92234
Prepared by:

The Altum Group
44-600 Village Court, Suite 100
Palm Desert, CA 92260
July 2024
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Rosemount Storage Project 1 The Altum Group
MMRP
EnvironmentalImpact MitigationMeasure
Action ,Responsibility
and Timing
Implementation
Monitoring

4.4 Biological Resources
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Mitigation Measure:

BIO-1: Regardless of the time of year, nesting
bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified
avian biologist no more than 3 days prior to
vegetation removal or ground-disturbing
activities. Pre-construction surveys shall focus
on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting,
including nest locations and nesting behavior.

The qualified avian biologist will make every
effort to avoid potential nest predation as a
result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active
nests are found during the pre-construction
nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall
establish an appropriate nest buffer to be
marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species
specific and shall be at least 300 feet for
passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or
larger buffer may be determined by the
qualified biologist familiar with the nesting
phenology of the nesting species and based on
nest and buffer monitoring results.

Construction activities may not occur inside the
established buffers, which shall remain on-site
until a qualified biologist determines the young
have fledged or the nest is no longer active.

Active nests and adequacy of the established
buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the
qualified biologist until the qualified biologist
has determined the young have fledged or the
Project has been completed. The qualified
biologist has the authority to stop work if
nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance.

BIO-2: Suitable burrowing owl habitat has been
confirmed on the site; therefore, focused
burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a
Responsibility:

Applicant

Action: Development of Bird
Survey with Emphasis on
Burrowing Owls.

Timing: 3 days prior to any
permit involving the following:
vegetation removal or ground
disturbing activities,.

Implementation:

Preparation of a report
that confirm that the site
is free of nesting birds,
burrowing owls, and sand
dependent covered
species to be approved by
the Planning Division of
the Community and
Economic Development
Department of the City of
Cathedral City.

Initials: Date:

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Rosemount Storage Project 2 The Altum Group
MMRP
EnvironmentalImpact MitigationMeasure
Action ,Responsibility
and Timing
Implementation
Monitoring
qualified biologist according to the Staff Report
on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012 or
most recent version) prior to vegetation
removal or ground-disturbing activities. If
burrowing owls are detected during the focused
surveys, the qualified biologist and Project
proponent shall begin coordination with CDFW
and USFWS immediately and shall prepare a
Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to
CDFW for review and approval prior to
commencing Project activities. The Burrowing
Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance,
minimization, mitigation, and monitoring
actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include
the number and location of occupied burrow
sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be
impacted, details of site monitoring, and details
on proposed buffers and other avoidance
measures. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl
habitat or burrow cannot be avoided, the
Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe
minimization and relocation actions that will be
implemented. Proposed implementation of
burrow exclusion and closure should only be
considered as a last resort, after all other
options have been evaluated as exclusion is not
in itself an avoidance, minimization, or
mitigation method and has the possibility to
result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows
cannot be avoided, information shall be
provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable
habitat available to owls along with proposed
relocation actions. The Project proponent shall
implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following
CDFW and USFWS review and approval.

Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be
conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start
of Project-related activities and within 24 hours
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Rosemount Storage Project 3 The Altum Group
MMRP
EnvironmentalImpact MitigationMeasure
Action ,Responsibility
and Timing
Implementation
Monitoring
prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with
the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation
(CDFG, 2012 or most recent version).

Preconstruction surveys should be performed
by a qualified biologist following the
recommendations and guidelines provided in
the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If
the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied
burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be
immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall
coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing
Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW and
USFWS for review and approval prior to
commencing Project activities.

BIO-4: Prior to vegetation removal or grounddisturbing activities, the City of Cathedral City will collaborate with the Coachella Valley
Conservation Commission to plan and
implement a salvage of sand-dependent
Covered Species within the Project site.

4.4 Biological Resources
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Mitigation Measure:

BIO-5: Prior to construction and issuance of any
grading permit, the City of Cathedral City shall
ensure compliance with the Coachella Valley
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
(CVMSHCP) and its associated Implementing
Agreement and shall ensure the collection of
payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee and transfer of revenues to the
Coachella Valley Conservation Commission.

Responsibility: Applicant
Action: Payment of
CVMHSCP Fees.

Timing: Prior to issuance of
any permits.

Implementation:

Applicant shall Submit for
a grading permit and
review to ensure
compliance with
CVMSHCP and payment of
applicable fees to the
Building Division of the
Community and Economic
Development
Department.

Initials: __ Date: __
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Rosemount Storage Project 4 The Altum Group
MMRP
EnvironmentalImpact MitigationMeasure
Action ,Responsibility
and Timing
Implementation
Monitoring

4.5 Cultural Resources
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
Mitigation Measure:

CUL-1: Prior to grading disturbance activities,
the City of Cathedral City Planning Department
shall inform field personnel of the possibilities
of a buried cultural resource find. A qualified
archaeologist shall be made available by the
applicant during all ground disturbing activities
should any unknown cultural resource be
uncovered. In addition, because the site is
located within the boundaries of the Agua
Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI)
Tribe’s Traditional Use Area, all ground
disturbing activities shall be monitored by a
ACBCI Tribal Monitor. In the event that field
personnel encounter buried cultural materials,
work in the immediate vicinity of the find shall
cease and the qualified archaeologist shall be
retained by the applicant to assess the
significance of the find. The qualified
archaeologist/Tribal monitor shall have the
authority to stop or divert construction
excavation as necessary. If the qualified
archaeologist finds that any cultural resources
found meet eligibility requirements for listing
on the California Register or the National
Register, plans for the treatment, evaluation
and mitigation of impacts to the find shall be
developed.

If it has been determined that the find, with
concurrence of the archaeologist, and tribal
monitor/THPO in the case of cultural resources,
has significance, the final disposition of the find
shall be determined with concurrence between
the archaeologist, THPO (in the case of tribal
cultural resources) and the City Planner. Once
the mitigation and disposition for the find has
Responsibility: Applicant

Action: Enter into an
Agreement to have a Tribal
Monitor on site during all
ground disturbing activities.

Timing:

Prior to the issuance of any
Permits.

Implementation:

Submit Agreement with
the Agua Caliente Tribe to
City of Cathedral City,
Planning Division of the
Community and
Economic Development
Department.

Initials: __ Date: __
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Rosemount Storage Project 5 The Altum Group
MMRP
EnvironmentalImpact MitigationMeasure
Action ,Responsibility
and Timing
Implementation
Monitoring
been determined, work in the vicinity of the
find shall resume at the direction of the
archaeologist.

Mitigation Measure:

CUL-2: Should human remains be discovered
on site during any ground disturbing activities,
further ground disturbance activities shall be
halted until processes governing an accidental
discovery of any human remains have been
initiated in accordance with Health and Safety
Code 7050.5, CEQA 15064.5€, and Public
Resources Code 5097.98.

Responsibility: Applicant
Action: Prior to the issuance of
any permits an Agreement with
the Agua Caliente Tribe shall be
approved by the Planning
Division of the Community and
Economic Development
Department of the City of
Cathedral City.

Timing:

During all ground disturbing
activities.

Implementation:

Process shall be outlined
in the Agreement for the
Tribal Monitoring from
the Agua Caliente tribe. It
should include: In the
event of discovering
human remains , the
County Coroner and
Cathedral City Police
Department shall be
contacted to rule out foul
play and then shall
coordinate with the Agua
Caliente Tribe as
appropriate.

Initials: __ Date: __

4.17 Transportation and Traffic
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
Mitigation Measure:

TRAN-1: The Project will be conditioned to
construct half-width roadway improvement
along the property frontage on Rosemount
Road including curb, gutter, sidewalk and
paving. The proposed traffic signal at the new
intersection of Date Palm Drive and Rosemount
Responsibility: Applicant
Action: Preparation of plans
detailing improvements.

Timing:

Approval by the Engineering
Implementation:

Construction of halfwidth roadway plans.

Initials: __ Date: __
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Rosemount Storage Project 6 The Altum Group
MMRP
EnvironmentalImpact MitigationMeasure
Action ,Responsibility
and Timing
Implementation
Monitoring
Road will be constructed by whichever project
is constructed first between Date Palm Drive
Mixed Use, the Wren Project, and the Vallarta
Shopping Center.

Department of the City of
Cathedral City before any
permits are issued for the
first phase of the project.

4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
a) Would the Project cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as
either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural
value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in
its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall
consider the significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe.

CUL-1 Prior to grading disturbance activities,
the City of Cathedral City Planning Department
shall inform field personnel of the possibilities
of a buried cultural resource find. A qualified
archaeologist shall be made available by the
applicant during all ground disturbing activities
should any unknown cultural resource be
uncovered. In addition, because the site is
located within the boundaries of the Agua
Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Tribe’s
Traditional Use Area, all ground disturbing
activities shall be monitored a ACBCI Tribal
Monitor. In the event that field personnel
encounter buried cultural materials, work in the
immediate vicinity of the find shall cease and
the qualified archaeologist shall be retained by
the applicant to assess the significance of the
find. The qualified archaeologist/Tribal monitor
shall have the authority to stop or divert
construction excavation as necessary. If the
qualified archaeologist finds that any cultural
resources found meet eligibility requirements
for listing on the California Register or the
National Register, plans for the treatment,
evaluation, and mitigation of impacts to the find
shall be developed.

If it has been determined that the find, with
concurrence of the archaeologist, and tribal
monitor/THPO in the case of cultural resources,
has significance, the final disposition of the find
shall be determined with concurrence between
the archaeologist, THPO (in the case of tribal
Responsibility: Applicant

Action: Prior to the issuance
of any permits a Native
American Monitoring
Agreement shall be
approved by the Planning
Division of the Community
and Economic Development
Department.

Timing:

Monitor shall be present
during all during all ground
disturbing activities.

Implementation:

Submit Agreement with
the Native American
Monitor to the, Planning
Division of the
Community and
Economic Development
of the City of Cathedral
City.

Initials: __ Date: __
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Rosemount Storage Project 7 The Altum Group
MMRP
EnvironmentalImpact MitigationMeasure
Action ,Responsibility
and Timing
Implementation
Monitoring
cultural resources) and the City Planner. Once
the mitigation and disposition for the find has
been determined, work in the vicinity of the find
shall resume at the direction of the
archaeologist.

CUL-2: Should human remains be discovered on
site during any ground disturbance activities,
further ground disturbance activities shall be
halted until processes governing an accidental
discovery of any human remains have been
initiated in accordance with Health and Safety
Code 7050.5, CEQA 15064.5(e), and Public
Resources Code 5097.98.

Responsibility: Applicant
Action: Prior to the issuance
of any permits a Native
American Monitoring
Agreement shall be
approved by the Planning
Division of the Community
and Economic Development
Department of the City of
Cathedral City.

Timing:

During all ground disturbing
activities.

Implementation:

Process shall be outlined
in the Agreement for the
Tribal Monitoring to
include the discovery of
human remains. In that
event, the County
Coroner and Cathedral
City Police Department
shall be contacted to rule
out foul play and then
shall coordinate with the
Agua Caliente Tribe as
appropriate.

Initials: __ Date: __
Staff Report
City Council
Item No. 5.A
Meeting Date: September 11, 2024
From: John A. Corella - Director of Public Works
Title: Award a Construction Contract to Contractor for HSIP Cycle 9B:

Varner Road Safety Improvements Project - CIP No. C08751 RECOMMENDATION:

To award a construction contract to Granite Construction Company in the amount of $743,000 for the construction of Highway Safety Improvements Program (HSIP) Cycle 9B:

Varner Road Safety Improvements project (C08751); and, approve a fifteen percent (15%) contingency in the amount of $111,450 for any unforeseeable construction costs; making the total encumbrance $854,450; and, approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $73,665 by allocating funds from the Measure A Fund with account number 243-100-150- 156-8800-8802; and, authorize the City Manager to execute the contract documents; and, authorize the City Engineer to request bonds and insurance for the project and issue the notice to proceed.

BACKGROUND:

In December 2018, the City of Cathedral City (City) was awarded a $1,089,700 Highway Safety Improvements Program (HSIP) Cycle 9 grant to install safety improvements on Date Palm Drive from Interstate 10 (I-10) to Varner Road, and Varner Road from Date Palm Drive to Mountain View Road. The proposed improvements in the application included the installation of pavement rumble strips along the centerline and edge-lines of the roadways, installation of guardrail, and replacement of existing standard stop signs with solar-powered flashing stop signs at three (3) intersections.

In August 2019, a Caltrans Authorization/Agreement Summary (E-76) was approved obligating funding for the preliminary engineering design phase of the project, and a federal project number was issued in September 2019.

In January 2020, the City Council approved an agreement for professional services with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA) to complete the preliminary design phase which included environmental studies and project design. Amendment No. 1 to the agreement incorporating additional technical studies to evaluate the impacts of the project on cultural resources was approved by Council in June 2021, and Amendment No. 2 extending the term of the agreement for additional twelve months was approved by Council in January 2023.

In January 2024, Caltrans and city staff held a meeting to discuss the dramatic increases in construction costs since the city submitted the original HSIP application and construction estimates in 2018. Caltrans recommended revising the project limits and proposed improvements to maintain the project within the HSIP grant funding allocation. The scope of the project was reduced to install centerline rumble strips, install flashing stop signs, and install guardrail along Varner Road between Mountain View Road to approximately 1 mile east of Date Palm Drive. Caltrans approved the changes in the scope of the project on January 16, 2024.

In February 2024, KHA completed the final plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for this project. Subsequently, city staff submitted the request for funding allocation (RFA) for the construction phase that was approved by Caltrans on April 18, 2024, allowing the city to proceed with the construction phase for this project.

Following federally funded projects requirements, the city issued a request for proposals and qualifications (RFP/Q) seeking qualified professional consultant companies to perform construction engineering support services. On April 24, 2024, the City Council approved the agreement with Willdan Engineering (Willdan) to perform construction engineering support services for this project. Willdan and city staff performed a constructability review and prepared the bid documents.

DISCUSSION:

On Friday, June 28, 2024, the city advertised an invitation to bid, requesting qualified contractors to perform the described scope of work found in Bid No. B24-60E, which includes the plans and specifications for these projects. This solicitation was made available to contractors for twenty-five (25) calendar days and advertised in the following locations:

Desert Sun - Published on June 28, 2024
PlanIt Print Works - From June 28, 2024 until July 23, 2024 City’s Website - From June 28, 2024 until July 23, 2024 On July 23, 2024, the city did not receive any bid proposals for this project.

The city readvertised the invitation to bid on Wednesday, July 31, 2024. This solicitation was made available to contractors for twenty-two (22) calendar days and advertised in the following locations:

Desert Sun - Published on July 31, 2024
PlanIt Print Works - From July 31, 2024 until August 22, 2024 City’s Website - From July 31, 2024 until August 22, 2024 On August 22, 2024, the City received one (1) bid proposal for this project from Granite Construction Company’s (Granite) in the amount of $743,000. Granite from Indio, CA was the only responsive and responsible bidder.

City staff contacted Caltrans Office of Local Assistance Division of Planning and received confirmation the city would be able to award the project after receiving only one bid proposal.

Engineering staff is recommending the City Council award a construction contract to Granite Construction Company in the amount of $743,000 for the construction of Highway Safety Improvements Program (HSIP) Cycle 9B: Varner Road Safety Improvements Project (C08751); and, approve a fifteen percent (15%) contingency in the amount of $111,450 for any unforeseeable construction costs; making the total encumbrance $854,450; and, approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $73,665 by allocating funds from available Measure A Funds - account number 243-100-150-156-8800-8802; and, authorize the City Manager to execute the contract documents; and, authorize the City Engineer to request bonds and insurance for the project and issue the notice to proceed.

All work will be performed within the existing city right-of-way. Construction is scheduled to start in December 2024 and is estimated to be completed in February 2025.

Environmental Analysis:

The Project has received environmental clearances through the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process from the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (TPHO). A Notice of Exemption (NOE) was filed with the County of Riverside and the Department of Fish and Wildlife per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements on October 27, 2023. No permits will be required from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total grant funding obligated from HISP Cycle 9 included funds for preliminary engineering (PE), construction engineering (CE), and construction (CON), in the amount of $1,089,700.

The PE phase has been completed, leaving a balance of HSIP grant funds in the amount of $895,200 for CE and CON of the Project.

On April 24, 2024, the City Council awarded the CE phase to Willdan Engineering in the amount of $114,415. The remaining balance of HSIP grant funds for the construction of the project is in the amount of $780,785.

HSIP Funds for CON and CE $895,200
Willdan Engineering (CE phase) $114,415
HSIP Funds Remaining for CON $780,785
Granite’s bid was in the amount of $743,000. City staff is proposing to include 15% contingency, in the amount of $111,450, for an estimated construction cost of $854,450.

Granite Bid $743,000
15% Contingency $111,450
Estimated Construction Cost $854,450
To account for the difference between the HSIP grant funds remaining for construction and the estimated construction cost, staff is proposing to allocate available Measure A funds in the amount of $73,665.

Estimated Construction Cost $854,450
HSIP Funds Remaining for CON $780,785
Measure A Funds (available) $ 73,665
Thus, staff is requesting a budget amendment in the amount of $73,665 from available Measure A Funds to complete the project.

The following table summarizes the budget allocations for the construction of the project.

FISCAL YEAR DESCRIPTION GENERAL LEDGER

ACCOUNT CODES

PROJECT

CODE AMOUNT

ONE TIME
or

ONGOING
2024-2025 HSIP 9B Fund 331-100-150-156-
8800-8802 C08751 $780,785 ONE TIME
2024-2025 Measure A Funds 243-100-150-156-
8800-8802 C08751 $ 73,665 ONE TIME
Total $854,450
FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN:

GOAL B: COMMUNITY INVEMENTS
OBJECTIVE: Cathedral City roads, gateways, public spaces, and other infrastructure are well planned, designed, constructed and maintained.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. HSIP 9B Project Location

2. HSIP 9B Bid Tabulation

3. Contract
Project Location

CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY
HSIP CYCLE 9B
CITY PROJECT No.: 8751
Bid Tabulation/ Analysis

GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL
BID SCHEDULE NO. 1: HSIP 9B
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 MOBILIZATION

CLEARING & GRUBBING

TRAFFIC CONTROL

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL

PAVEMENT MARKING
1 1
1 1
1 1
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LF
LF
LF
EA
EA
EA
EA
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30,000.50
30,000.00
115,167.00
10,000.00
80,156.00
21,305.00

22.00 3.50

59.50 4,204.50
4,270.00
4,270.00
10,040.00
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30,000.50
30,000.00
115,167.00
10,000.00
80,156.00
21,305.00
228,052.00
57,036.00
54,918.50
42,045.00
25,620.00
8,540.00

SIGNING
2' WIDE MILL AND FILL 0.2' 10,366
CONSTRUCT CENTERLINE RUMBLE STRIPS 16,296

CONSTRUCT MIDWEST GUARDRAIL SYSTEM

INSTALL SOLAR LED STOP SIGN

INSTALL SOLAR LED STOP AHEAD SIGN

INSTALL SOLAR LED CURVE WARNING SIGN

INSTALL SOLAR LED SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN
923
10 6
2 4 40,160.00
SUB-TOTAL BID SCHEDULE NO.1 $ 743,000.00
TOTAL ALL BID ITEMS $ 743,000.00
Agreement 1300-1

CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT, by and between the CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY, a municipal corporation, herein referred to as "City, and GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, herein referred to as, "Contractor." W I T N E S S E T H:

In consideration of their mutual covenants, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Contractor shall furnish all necessary labor, material, equipment, transportation, and services for Bid No. B24-60E, Project No. CIP 8751, FEDERAL AID Project NO. HSIPL-5430(035), VARNER ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (the “Work”) in the City of Cathedral City, California. The Work shall be done in strict conformity with this Contract, approved Change Orders, the Invitation to Bid dated July 31, 2024, Instructions to Bidders, permits issued by the City or other agencies, the General and Specific Project Requirements, Standard Specifications, Plans, Referenced Specifications, the General Conditions, Supplementary Conditions the Contractor's Bid dated August 22, 2024, and any addenda thereto (the “Contract Documents”) all of which shall be considered a part hereof as though fully set herein.

2. Contractor will comply with all Federal, State, County, and City of Cathedral City laws, regulations and policies, which are, as amended from time to time, incorporated herein by reference.

3. All work shall be done in a workman like manner and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

4. Time is of the essence in Contractor’s performance of the Work for this Contract. Contractor agrees to diligently pursue the performance and completion of the Work in every detail to the satisfaction of the City.

Contractor shall commence work after the issuance of a written Notice to Proceed and agrees to have all work completed within Sixty (60) calendar days from the date of Notification to Proceed.

5. In consideration of said Work, City agrees to pay Contractor such sums as shall be approved by the City Engineer at lump sums and/or unit prices stated in the Contractor's Bid. The total compensation to Contractor for all Work shall not exceed Seven Hundred Forty-Three Thousand Dollars($743,000). All payments shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer and shall be in accordance with the terms, conditions, and procedures provided in the Contract Documents.

6. The Contractor, and any subcontractor engaged by Contractor, shall not pay less than the general prevailing rate for per diem wages, as determined by the State of California Department of Industrial Relations and referred to in the Invitation to Bid, to any workman employed for the work to be performed under this contract; and the Contractor shall forfeit as a penalty to the City up to Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for each calendar day, or fraction thereof, for every workman paid by Contractor or by any subcontractor engaged by Contractor, in violation of this provision (Sections 1770-1777, Labor Code of California).

7. Concurrently with the execution of this Contract, Contractor shall furnish bonds of a surety satisfactory to City, as provided in the Contract Documents, the cost of which shall be paid by Contractor.

8. Contractor agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, release and defend (even if the allegations are false, fraudulent or groundless), to the maximum extent permitted by law, the City, its City Council and each member thereof, and its officers, employees, commission members and representatives, from any and all liability, loss, suits, claims, damages, costs, judgments and expenses (including attorney's fees and costs of litigation) which in whole or in part are claimed to result from or to arise out of the usage or operation, including the malfunctioning of, or, any injury caused by, any product purchased herein; or any acts, errors or omissions (including, without limitation, professional negligence) of Contractor, its employees, representatives, subcontractors, or agents in connection with the performance of this Contract. This agreement to indemnify includes, but is not limited to, personal injury (including death at any time) and damage to property (including, but without limitation, contract or tort or patent, copyright, trade secret or trademark infringement) sustained by any person or persons (including, but not limited to, companies, or corporations, Contractor and its employees or agents, and members of the general public.

9. Except as otherwise required, Contractor shall concurrently with the execution of this Contract, furnish the City satisfactory evidence of insurance of the kinds and in the amounts provided in the Contract Agreement 1300-2
Documents. This insurance shall be kept in full force and effect by Contractor during this entire contract and all premiums thereon shall be promptly paid by it. Each policy shall further state that it cannot be canceled without 30 days unconditional written notice to the City and shall name the City as an additional insured. Contractor shall furnish evidence of having in effect, and shall maintain Workers Compensation Insurance coverage of not less than the statutory amount or otherwise show a certificate of self-insurance, in accordance with the Workers Compensation laws of the State of California. Failure to maintain the required amounts and types of coverage throughout the duration of this Contract shall constitute a material breach of this Contract.

10. Contractor shall forfeit as a penalty to City $25.00 for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of this Contract by said Contractor, or any subcontractor under it, upon any of the work herein mentioned, for each calendar day during which such laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to work at other than a rate of pay provided by law for more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week, in violation of the provisions of Sections 1810-1815 of the Labor Code of the State of California.

11. In accepting this Contract, Contractor certifies that in the conduct of its business it does not deny the right of any individual to seek, obtain and hold employment without discrimination because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status as provided in the California Fair Employment Practice Act (Government Code Sections 12900, et seq.) Contractor agrees that a finding by the State Fair Employment Practices Commission that Contractor has engaged during the term of this Contract in any unlawful employment practice shall be deemed a breach of this Contract and Contractor shall pay to City $500.00 liquidated damages for each such breach committed under this Contract.

12. Contractor also agrees that for contracts in excess of $30,000 that apprentices will be employed without discrimination in an approved program in a ratio established in the apprenticeship standards of the craft involved (Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6, Labor Code of California). Contractors who willfully fail to comply will be denied the right to bid on public projects for a period of six months in addition to other penalties provided by law.

13. The Contractor and Sub-Contractors shall comply with the Davis-Bacon Fair Labor Standards Act (40 USC a-276 a-5), and the implementation regulations issued pursuant thereto (29 CFR Section 1, 5) and any amendments thereof. The applicable wage rates, which are in effect within 10 days of the bid opening and are set forth in Exhibit A to this Section 1300, shall be used. These wage rates are available from the Wage Determinations Online website at: www.beta.sam.gov. In the event of a discrepancy between the rates set forth in Exhibit A to this Section 1300, the Prevailing rate established by the State Department of Industrial Relations, and the Federal Prevailing rates, the higher of the rates will be used.

14. This Contract shall not be assignable by Contractor without the written consent of City.

15. Contractor shall notify the City Engineer (in writing) forthwith when the Contract is deemed completed.

16. In accepting this Contract, Contractor certifies that no member or officer of the firm or corporation is an officer or employee of the City except to the extent permitted by law.

17. Contractor certifies that it is the holder of any necessary California State Contractor's License and authorized to undertake the Work. Contractor must, at Contractor’s sole expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses required for the Work, and give all necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law, including, without limitation, any business license tax imposed by City. Contractor represents and declares to Agency that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature which are legally required to practice its profession.

18. The City, or its authorized auditors or representatives, shall have access to and the right to audit and reproduce any of the Contractor records to the extent the City deems necessary to insure it is receiving all money to which it is entitled under the contract and/or is paying only the amounts to which Contractor is properly entitled under the Contract or for other purposes relating to the Contract.

19. The Contractor shall maintain and preserve all such records for a period of at least three years after termination of the Contract.

Agreement 1300-3

20. The Contractor shall maintain all such records in the City of Cathedral City. If not, the Contractor shall, upon request, promptly deliver the records to the City or reimburse the City for all reasonable and extra costs incurred in conducting the audit at a location other than at City offices including, but not limited to, such additional (out of the City) expenses for personnel, salaries, private auditors, travel, lodging, meals and overhead.

21. In entering into this Contract or a contract with a subcontractor to supply goods, services, or materials pursuant to this Contract, Contractor and any or subcontractor is deemed to have offered and agreed to assign to City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, commencing with Section 16700 of Part 2 of Division 7 of the California Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials for the Contract.

This assignment will be deemed made and will become effective at the time City tenders final payment to Contractor, without further acknowledgement by the Parties.

22. Required Contract Provisions for Federal Aid Construction Contracts (FHWA – 1273). This Contract is funded with Federal-Aid Highway funds and is subject to provisions under Title 23 of the United States Code (23 USC). As such, the Contractor agrees to the provisions titled “Required Contract Provisions for Federal Aid Construction Contracts” set forth in Exhibit B to this Section 1300. Additionally, the Contractor agrees to insert the provisions set forth in Exhibit B, unaltered, into each subcontract and further require their inclusion in all lower tier subcontracts excluding purchase orders, rental agreements, and other agreements for supplies or services.

23. The Parties agree that, in accordance with the City’s Electronic Signature Use Policy, adopted on August 10, 2023, and as amended thereafter, the Parties may use electronic signatures to execute this document. Any use of electronic signatures to execute this document shall comply with the City’s Electronic Signature Use Policy, and such signatures shall have the same force and effect as if this Agreement were executed by hand. Signer acknowledges that is has had an opportunity to request and review the City’s Electronic Signature Use Policy, and Signer agrees to comply with the Electronic Signature Use Policy. Signer agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from any claim, damage, or liability associated with transmitting an electronic signature or an electronically signed record by electronic transmission.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Contract as of the dates stated below.

Agreement 1300-4
"CITY"

CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY,
a California municipal corporation
By:________________________________ Dated:______________________________ Charles McClendon
City Manager
ATTEST:

Dated: _____________________________
Tracey R. Hermosillo, CMC,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Dated: _____________________________
Eric Vail, City Attorney
“CONTRACTOR”
Dated: By: _______________________________
Name: _______________________________
Title: _______________________________
Dated: By: ________________________________
Name: ________________________________
Title: ________________________________
[CONTRACTOR SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED. IF CONTRACTOR IS A CORPORATION OR LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, TWO SIGNATURES MUST BE PROVIDED.] Agreement 1300-5

EXHIBIT A TO CONTRACT

APPLICABLE WAGE RATES
"General Decision Number: CA20240025 08/09/2024
Superseded General Decision Number: CA20230025
State: California
Construction Types: Building, Heavy (Heavy and Dredging) and Highway
County: Riverside County in California.

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; DREDGING PROJECTS (does not include hopper dredge work); HEAVY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (does not include water well drilling); HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Note: Contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act are generally required to pay at least the applicable minimum wage rate required under Executive Order 14026 or Executive Order 13658.

Please note that these Executive Orders apply to covered contracts entered into by the federal government that are subject to the Davis-Bacon Act itself, but do not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(1).
______________________________________________________________ |If the contract is entered |. Executive Order 14026 |
|into on or after January 30, | generally applies to the | |2022, or the contract is | contract. |
|renewed or extended (e.g., an |. The contractor must pay | |option is exercised) on or | all covered workers at |
|after January 30, 2022: | least $17.20 per hour (or |
| | the applicable wage rate |
| | listed on this wage |
| | determination, if it is |
| | higher) for all hours |
| | spent performing on the |
| | contract in 2024. |
|______________________________|_____________________________| |If the contract was awarded on|. Executive Order 13658 | |or between January 1, 2015 and| generally applies to the | |January 29, 2022, and the | contract. |
|contract is not renewed or |. The contractor must pay all| Agreement 1300-6
|extended on or after January | covered workers at least | |30, 2022: | $12.90 per hour (or the |
| | applicable wage rate listed|
| | on this wage determination,|
| | if it is higher) for all |
| | hours spent performing on |
| | that contract in 2024. |
|______________________________|_____________________________| The applicable Executive Order minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. If this contract is covered by one of the Executive Orders and a classification considered necessary for performance of work on the contract does not appear on this wage determination, the contractor must still submit a
conformance request.

Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the Executive Orders is available at
http://www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Modification Number Publication Date
0 01/05/2024
1 01/12/2024
2 01/19/2024
3 02/23/2024
4 03/08/2024
5 05/24/2024
6 06/28/2024
7 07/05/2024
8 07/12/2024
9 08/09/2024
ASBE0005-002 09/01/2023
Rates Fringes
Asbestos Workers/Insulator
(Includes the application of
all insulating materials,
protective coverings,
coatings, and finishes to all
types of mechanical systems).....$ 49.58 25.27
Fire Stop Technician
(Application of Firestopping
Materials for wall openings
Agreement 1300-7
and penetrations in walls,
floors, ceilings and curtain
walls)...........................$ 36.97 20.36
---------------------------------------------------------------- ASBE0005-004 07/04/2022
Rates Fringes
Asbestos Removal
worker/hazardous material
handler (Includes
preparation, wetting,
stripping, removal,
scrapping, vacuuming, bagging
and disposing of all
insulation materials from
mechanical systems, whether
they contain asbestos or not)....$ 23.52 13.37
---------------------------------------------------------------- BOIL0092-003 01/01/2024
Rates Fringes
BOILERMAKER......................$ 51.98 42.11
---------------------------------------------------------------- * BRCA0004-011 05/01/2024
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER; MARBLE SETTER........$ 45.53 20.29
*The wage scale for prevailing wage projects performed in Blythe, China lake, Death Valley, Fort Irwin, Twenty-Nine Palms, Needles and 1-15 corridor (Barstow to the Nevada State Line) will be Three Dollars ($3.00) above the
standard San Bernardino/Riverside County hourly wage rate ---------------------------------------------------------------- BRCA0018-004 06/01/2023
Rates Fringes
MARBLE FINISHER..................$ 40.21 15.23
TILE FINISHER....................$ 34.78 13.64
TILE LAYER.......................$ 48.29 19.18
---------------------------------------------------------------- Agreement 1300-8
BRCA0018-010 09/01/2023
Rates Fringes
TERRAZZO FINISHER................$ 39.95 14.65
TERRAZZO WORKER/SETTER...........$ 47.85 15.14
---------------------------------------------------------------- CARP0213-001 07/01/2021
Rates Fringes

CARPENTER
(1) Carpenter, Cabinet
Installer, Insulation
Installer, Hardwood Floor
Worker and acoustical
installer...................$ 51.60 16.28
(2) Millwright..............$ 52.10 16.48
(3) Piledrivermen/Derrick
Bargeman, Bridge or Dock
Carpenter, Heavy Framer,
Rock Bargeman or Scowman,
Rockslinger, Shingler
(Commercial)................$ 51.73 16.28
(4) Pneumatic Nailer,
Power Stapler...............$ 51.85 16.28
(5) Sawfiler...............$ 51.69 16.28
(6) Scaffold Builder.......$ 42.80 16.28
(7) Table Power Saw
Operator....................$ 51.70 16.28
FOOTNOTE: Work of forming in the construction of open cut sewers or storm drains, on operations in which horizontal lagging is used in conjunction with steel H-Beams driven or placed in pre- drilled holes, for that portion of a lagged trench against which concrete is poured, namely, as a
substitute for back forms (which work is performed by
piledrivers): $0.13 per hour additional.
---------------------------------------------------------------- CARP0213-002 07/01/2021
Rates Fringes
Diver
(1) Wet.....................$ 834.40 16.28
Agreement 1300-9
(2) Standby.................$ 445.84 16.28
(3) Tender..................$ 437.84 16.28
(4) Assistant Tender........$ 413.84 16.28
Amounts in ""Rates' column are per day
---------------------------------------------------------------- CARP0213-004 07/01/2021
Rates Fringes
Drywall
DRYWALL INSTALLER/LATHER....$ 51.60 16.28
STOCKER/SCRAPPER............$ 22.16 8.62
---------------------------------------------------------------- CARP0721-001 07/01/2021
Rates Fringes
Modular Furniture Installer......$ 21.85 7.15
---------------------------------------------------------------- ELEC0440-001 01/01/2024
Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN
INSIDE ELECTRICIAN..........$ 53.76 3%+27.50

INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION

SYSTEMS
Electrician................$ 36.99 3%+23.18
Technician.................$ 27.75 3%+23.18
ZONE PAY: Zone A: Free travel zone for all contractors
performing work in Zone A.

Zone B:Any work performed in Zone (B) shall add $12.00 per hour to the current wage scale. Zone (B) shall be the area from the eastern perimeter of Zone (A) to a line which runs north and south begininng at Little Morongo Canyon (San Bernardino/Riverside County Line), Southeast along the
Coachella Tunnels, Colorado River Aqueduct and Mecca
Tunnels to Pinkham Wash then South to Box Canyon Road, then southwest along Box Canyon Road to Highway 195 west onto 195 south to Highway 86 to Riverside/Imperial County Line. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ELEC1245-001 06/01/2024
Agreement 1300-10
Rates Fringes

LINE CONSTRUCTION
(1) Lineman; Cable splicer..$ 70.16 24.46
(2) Equipment specialist
(operates crawler
tractors, commercial motor
vehicles, backhoes,
trenchers, cranes (50 tons
and below), overhead &
underground distribution
line equipment).............$ 53.30 22.01
(3) Groundman...............$ 40.76 21.51
(4) Powderman...............$ 51.87 18.79
HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day, M.L. King Day, Memorial Day,
Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day and day after Thanksgiving, Christmas Day
---------------------------------------------------------------- ELEV0018-001 01/01/2024
Rates Fringes
ELEVATOR MECHANIC................$ 66.63 37.885+a+b
FOOTNOTE:
a. PAID VACATION: Employer contributes 8% of regular hourly rate as vacation pay credit for employees with more than 5 years of service, and 6% for 6 months to 5 years of service. b. PAID HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day, Friday after Thanksgiving, and Christmas Day.
---------------------------------------------------------------- ENGI0012-004 08/01/2023
Rates Fringes
OPERATOR: Power Equipment
(DREDGING)
(1) Leverman................$ 64.10 34.60
(2) Dredge dozer............$ 58.13 34.60
(3) Deckmate................$ 58.02 34.60
(4) Winch operator (stern
Agreement 1300-11
winch on dredge)............$ 57.47 34.60
(5) Fireman-Oiler,
Deckhand, Bargeman,
Leveehand...................$ 56.93 34.60
(6) Barge Mate..............$ 57.54 34.60
---------------------------------------------------------------- ENGI0012-024 07/01/2023
Rates Fringes
OPERATOR: Power Equipment
(All Other Work)
GROUP 1....................$ 53.90 32.80
GROUP 2....................$ 54.68 32.80
GROUP 3....................$ 54.97 32.80
GROUP 4....................$ 56.46 32.80
GROUP 6....................$ 56.68 32.80
GROUP 8....................$ 56.79 32.80
GROUP 10....................$ 56.91 32.80
GROUP 12....................$ 57.08 32.80
GROUP 13....................$ 57.18 32.80
GROUP 14....................$ 57.21 32.80
GROUP 15....................$ 57.29 32.80
GROUP 16....................$ 57.41 32.80
GROUP 17....................$ 57.58 32.80
GROUP 18....................$ 57.68 32.80
GROUP 19....................$ 57.79 32.80
GROUP 20....................$ 57.91 32.80
GROUP 21....................$ 58.08 32.80
GROUP 22....................$ 58.18 32.80
GROUP 23....................$ 58.29 32.80
GROUP 24....................$ 58.41 32.80
GROUP 25....................$ 58.58 32.80
OPERATOR: Power Equipment
(Cranes, Piledriving &
Hoisting)
GROUP 1....................$ 55.25 32.80
GROUP 2....................$ 56.03 32.80
GROUP 3....................$ 56.32 32.80
GROUP 4....................$ 56.46 32.80
GROUP 5....................$ 56.68 32.80
GROUP 6....................$ 56.79 32.80
GROUP 7....................$ 56.91 32.80
GROUP 8....................$ 57.08 32.80
GROUP 9....................$ 57.25 32.80
GROUP 10....................$ 58.25 32.80
Agreement 1300-12
GROUP 11....................$ 59.25 32.80
GROUP 12....................$ 60.25 32.80
GROUP 13....................$ 61.25 32.80
OPERATOR: Power Equipment
(Tunnel Work)
GROUP 1....................$ 55.75 32.80
GROUP 2....................$ 56.53 32.80
GROUP 3....................$ 56.82 32.80
GROUP 4....................$ 56.96 32.80
GROUP 5....................$ 57.18 32.80
GROUP 6....................$ 57.29 32.80
GROUP 7....................$ 57.41 32.80
PREMIUM PAY:
$10.00 per hour shall be paid on all Power Equipment Operator work on the followng Military Bases: China Lake Naval
Reserve, Vandenberg AFB, Point Arguello, Seely Naval Base, Fort Irwin, Nebo Annex Marine Base, Marine Corp Logistics Base Yermo, Edwards AFB, 29 Palms Marine Base and Camp
Pendleton
Workers required to suit up and work in a hazardous material environment: $2.00 per hour additional. Combination mixer and compressor operator on gunite work shall be classified as a concrete mobile mixer operator.

SEE ZONE DEFINITIONS AFTER CLASSIFICATIONS

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATORS CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Bargeman; Brakeman; Compressor operator; Ditch Witch, with seat or similar type equipment; Elevator
operator-inside; Engineer Oiler; Forklift operator
(includes loed, lull or similar types under 5 tons;
Generator operator; Generator, pump or compressor plant operator; Pump operator; Signalman; Switchman
GROUP 2: Asphalt-rubber plant operator (nurse tank
operator);Coil Tubing Rig Operator, Concrete mixer
operator-skip type; Conveyor operator; Fireman; Forklift operator (includes loed, lull or similar types over 5 tons; Hydrostatic pump operator; oiler crusher (asphalt or
concrete plant); Petromat laydown machine; PJU side dum jack; Screening and conveyor machine operator (or similar types); Skiploader (wheel type up to 3/4 yd. without
attachment); Tar pot fireman; Temporary heating plant
Agreement 1300-13
operator; Trenching machine oiler
GROUP 3: Asphalt-rubber blend operator; Bobcat or similar type (Skid steer); Equipment greaser (rack); Ford Ferguson (with dragtype attachments); Helicopter radioman (ground); Stationary pipe wrapping and cleaning machine operator
GROUP 4: Asphalt plant fireman; Backhoe operator (mini-max or similar type); Boring machine operator; Boxman or mixerman (asphalt or concrete); Chip spreading machine operator; Concrete cleaning decontamination machine operator;
Concrete Pump Operator (small portable);Direct Push
Operator (Geoprobe or similar types) Drilling machine
operator, small auger types (Texoma super economatic or similar types - Hughes 100 or 200 or similar types -
drilling depth of 30' maximum); Equipment greaser (grease truck); Guard rail post driver operator; Highline cableway signalman; Hydra-hammer-aero stomper; Micro Tunneling
(above ground tunnel); Power concrete curing machine
operator; Power concrete saw operator; Power-driven jumbo form setter operator; Power sweeper operator; Rock Wheel Saw/Trencher; Roller operator (compacting); Screed operator (asphalt or concrete); Trenching machine operator (up to 6 ft.); Vacuum or much truck
GROUP 6: Articulating material hauler; Asphalt plant
engineer; Batch plant operator; Bit sharpener; Concrete joint machine operator (canal and similar type); Concrete planer operator; Dandy digger; Deck engine operator;
Derrickman (oilfield type); Drilling machine operator,
bucket or auger types (Calweld 100 bucket or similar types - Watson 1000 auger or similar types - Texoma 330, 500 or 600 auger or similar types - drilling depth of 45'
maximum); Drilling machine operator; Hydrographic seeder machine operator (straw, pulp or seed), Jackson track
maintainer, or similar type; Kalamazoo Switch tamper, or similar type; Machine tool operator; Maginnis internal full slab vibrator, Mechanical berm, curb or gutter(concrete or asphalt); Mechanical finisher operator (concrete,
Clary-Johnson-Bidwell or similar); Micro tunnel system
(below ground); Pavement breaker operator (truck mounted); Road oil mixing machine operator; Roller operator (asphalt or finish), rubber-tired earth moving equipment (single engine, up to and including 25 yds. struck); Self-propelled tar pipelining machine operator; Skiploader operator
Agreement 1300-14
(crawler and wheel type, over 3/4 yd. and up to and
including 1-1/2 yds.); Slip form pump operator (power
driven hydraulic lifting device for concrete forms);
Tractor operator-bulldozer, tamper-scraper (single engine, up to 100 h.p. flywheel and similar types, up to and
including D-5 and similar types); Tugger hoist operator (1 drum); Ultra high pressure waterjet cutting tool system operator; Vacuum blasting machine operator
GROUP 8: Asphalt or concrete spreading operator (tamping or finishing); Asphalt paving machine operator (Barber Greene or similar type); Asphalt-rubber distribution operator; Backhoe operator (up to and including 3/4 yd.), small ford, Case or similar types; Cable Bundling Machine Operator
(excluding handheld); Cable Trenching Machine Operator
(Spider Plow or similar types) Cast-in-place pipe laying machine operator; Combination mixer and compressor operator (gunite work); Compactor operator (self-propelled);
Concrete mixer operator (paving); Crushing plant operator; Drill Doctor; Drilling machine operator, Bucket or auger types (Calweld 150 bucket or similar types - Watson 1500, 2000 2500 auger or similar types - Texoma 700, 800 auger or similar types - drilling depth of 60' maximum); Elevating grader operator; Grade checker; Gradall operator; Grouting machine operator; Heavy-duty repairman; Heavy equipment robotics operator; Kalamazoo balliste regulator or similar type; Kolman belt loader and similar type; Le Tourneau blob compactor or similar type; Loader operator (Athey, Euclid, Sierra and similar types); Mobark Chipper or similar; Ozzie padder or similar types; P.C. slot saw; Pneumatic concrete placing machine operator (Hackley-Presswell or similar
type); Pumpcrete gun operator; RCM Cementing Unit Operator, Rail/Switch Grinder Operator (Harsco or similar types)
Rock Drill or similar types; Rotary drill operator
(excluding caisson type); Rubber-tired earth-moving
equipment operator (single engine, caterpillar, Euclid, Athey Wagon and similar types with any and all attachments over 25 yds. up to and including 50 cu. yds. struck);
Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator (multiple
engine up to and including 25 yds. struck); Rubber-tired scraper operator (self-loading paddle wheel type-John
Deere, 1040 and similar single unit); Self- propelled curb and gutter machine operator; Shuttle buggy; Skiploader
operator (crawler and wheel type over 1-1/2 yds. up to and including 6-1/2 yds.); Soil remediation plant operator; Surface heaters and planer operator; Tractor compressor Agreement 1300-15
drill combination operator; Tractor operator (any type
larger than D-5 - 100 flywheel h.p. and over, or
similar-bulldozer, tamper, scraper and push tractor single engine); Tractor operator (boom attachments), Traveling pipe wrapping, cleaning and bendng machine operator;
Trenching machine operator (over 6 ft. depth capacity,
manufacturer's rating); trenching Machine with Road Miner attachment (over 6 ft depth capacity): Ultra high pressure waterjet cutting tool system mechanic; Water pull
(compaction) operator
GROUP 10: Drilling machine operator, Bucket or auger types (Calweld 200 B bucket or similar types-Watson 3000 or 5000 auger or similar types-Texoma 900 auger or similar
types-drilling depth of 105' maximum); Dual drum mixer, dynamic compactor LDC350 (or similar types); Monorail
locomotive operator (diesel, gas or electric); Motor
patrol-blade operator (single engine); Multiple engine
tractor operator (Euclid and similar type-except Quad 9 cat.); Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator (single engine, over 50 yds. struck); Pneumatic pipe ramming tool and similar types; Prestressed wrapping machine operator; Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator (single
engine, over 50 yds. struck); Rubber tired earth moving equipment operator (multiple engine, Euclid, caterpillar and similar over 25 yds. and up to 50 yds. struck), Tower crane repairman; Tractor loader operator (crawler and wheel type over 6-1/2 yds.); Woods mixer operator (and similar Pugmill equipment)
GROUP 12: Auto grader operator; Automatic slip form operator; Drilling machine operator, bucket or auger types (Calweld, auger 200 CA or similar types - Watson, auger 6000 or
similar types - Hughes Super Duty, auger 200 or similar types - drilling depth of 175' maximum); Hoe ram or similar with compressor; Mass excavator operator less tha 750 cu. yards; Mechanical finishing machine operator; Mobile form traveler operator; Motor patrol operator (multi-engine); Pipe mobile machine operator; Rubber-tired earth- moving equipment operator (multiple engine, Euclid, Caterpillar and similar type, over 50 cu. yds. struck); Rubber-tired self- loading scraper operator (paddle-wheel-auger type self-loading - two (2) or more units)
GROUP 13: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator
operating equipment with push-pull system (single engine, Agreement 1300-16
up to and including 25 yds. struck)
GROUP 14: Canal liner operator; Canal trimmer operator; Remote- control earth-moving equipment operator (operating a second piece of equipment: $1.00 per hour additional); Wheel excavator operator (over 750 cu. yds.)
GROUP 15: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with push-pull system (single engine, Caterpillar, Euclid, Athey Wagon and similar types with any and all attachments over 25 yds. and up to and including 50 yds. struck); Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with push-pull system (multiple
engine-up to and including 25 yds. struck)
GROUP 16: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with push-pull system (single engine, over 50 yds. struck); Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with push-pull system
(multiple engine, Euclid, Caterpillar and similar, over 25 yds. and up to 50 yds. struck)
GROUP 17: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with push-pull system (multiple engine, Euclid, Caterpillar and similar, over 50 cu. yds. struck); Tandem tractor operator (operating crawler type tractors in tandem - Quad 9 and similar type)
GROUP 18: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating in tandem (scrapers, belly dumps and similar
types in any combination, excluding compaction units -
single engine, up to and including 25 yds. struck)
GROUP 19: Rotex concrete belt operator (or similar types); Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating in tandem (scrapers, belly dumps and similar types in any
combination, excluding compaction units - single engine, Caterpillar, Euclid, Athey Wagon and similar types with any and all attachments over 25 yds.and up to and including 50 cu. yds. struck); Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment
operator, operating in tandem (scrapers, belly dumps and similar types in any combination, excluding compaction
units - multiple engine, up to and including 25 yds. struck) GROUP 20: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating in tandem (scrapers, belly dumps and similar
Agreement 1300-17
types in any combination, excluding compaction units -
single engine, over 50 yds. struck); Rubber-tired
earth-moving equipment operator, operating in tandem
(scrapers, belly dumps, and similar types in any
combination, excluding compaction units - multiple engine, Euclid, Caterpillar and similar, over 25 yds. and up to 50 yds. struck)
GROUP 21: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating in tandem (scrapers, belly dumps and similar
types in any combination, excluding compaction units -
multiple engine, Euclid, Caterpillar and similar type, over 50 cu. yds. struck)
GROUP 22: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with the tandem push-pull system
(single engine, up to and including 25 yds. struck)
GROUP 23: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with the tandem push-pull system
(single engine, Caterpillar, Euclid, Athey Wagon and
similar types with any and all attachments over 25 yds. and up to and including 50 yds. struck); Rubber-tired
earth-moving equipment operator, operating with the tandem push-pull system (multiple engine, up to and including 25 yds. struck)
GROUP 24: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with the tandem push-pull system
(single engine, over 50 yds. struck); Rubber-tired
earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with the tandem push-pull system (multiple engine, Euclid,
Caterpillar and similar, over 25 yds. and up to 50 yds. struck)
GROUP 25: Concrete pump operator-truck mounted; Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with the tandem push-pull system (multiple engine, Euclid,
Caterpillar and similar type, over 50 cu. yds. struck); Spyder Excavator Operator, with all attachments

CRANES, PILEDRIVING AND HOISTING EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATIONS GROUP 1: Engineer oiler; Fork lift operator (includes loed, lull or similar types)
Agreement 1300-18
GROUP 2: Truck crane oiler
GROUP 3: A-frame or winch truck operator; Ross carrier
operator (jobsite)
GROUP 4: Bridge-type unloader and turntable operator;
Helicopter hoist operator
GROUP 5: Hydraulic boom truck; Stinger crane (Austin-Western or similar type); Tugger hoist operator (1 drum)
GROUP 6: Bridge crane operator; Cretor crane operator; Hoist operator (Chicago boom and similar type); Lift mobile
operator; Lift slab machine operator (Vagtborg and similar types); Material hoist and/or manlift operator; Polar
gantry crane operator; Self Climbing scaffold (or similar type); Shovel, backhoe, dragline, clamshell operator (over 3/4 yd. and up to 5 cu. yds. mrc); Tugger hoist operator GROUP 7: Pedestal crane operator; Shovel, backhoe, dragline, clamshell operator (over 5 cu. yds. mrc); Tower crane
repair; Tugger hoist operator (3 drum)
GROUP 8: Crane operator (up to and including 25 ton
capacity); Crawler transporter operator; Derrick barge
operator (up to and including 25 ton capacity); Hoist
operator, stiff legs, Guy derrick or similar type (up to and including 25 ton capacity); Shovel, backhoe, dragline, clamshell operator (over 7 cu. yds., M.R.C.)
GROUP 9: Crane operator (over 25 tons and up to and including 50 tons mrc); Derrick barge operator (over 25 tons up to and including 50 tons mrc); Highline cableway operator; Hoist operator, stiff legs, Guy derrick or similar type (over 25 tons up to and including 50 tons mrc); K-crane operator; Polar crane operator; Self erecting tower crane operator maximum lifting capacity ten tons
GROUP 10: Crane operator (over 50 tons and up to and
including 100 tons mrc); Derrick barge operator (over 50 tons up to and including 100 tons mrc); Hoist operator, stiff legs, Guy derrick or similar type (over 50 tons up to and including 100 tons mrc), Mobile tower crane operator (over 50 tons, up to and including 100 tons M.R.C.);
GROUP 11: Crane operator (over 100 tons and up to and
Agreement 1300-19
including 200 tons mrc); Derrick barge operator (over 100 tons up to and including 200 tons mrc); Hoist operator, stiff legs, Guy derrick or similar type (over 100 tons up to and including 200 tons mrc); Mobile tower crane operator (over 100 tons up to and including 200 tons mrc) ; Tower crane operator and tower gantry
GROUP 12: Crane operator (over 200 tons up to and including 300 tons mrc); Derrick barge operator (over 200 tons up to and including 300 tons mrc); Hoist operator, stiff legs, Guy derrick or similar type (over 200 tons, up to and
including 300 tons mrc); Mobile tower crane operator (over 200 tons, up to and including 300 tons mrc)
GROUP 13: Crane operator (over 300 tons); Derrick barge operator (over 300 tons); Helicopter pilot; Hoist operator, stiff legs, Guy derrick or similar type (over 300 tons); Mobile tower crane operator (over 300 tons)

TUNNEL CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Skiploader (wheel type up to 3/4 yd. without
attachment)
GROUP 2: Power-driven jumbo form setter operator
GROUP 3: Dinkey locomotive or motorperson (up to and
including 10 tons)
GROUP 4: Bit sharpener; Equipment greaser (grease truck); Slip form pump operator (power-driven hydraulic lifting device for concrete forms); Tugger hoist operator (1 drum); Tunnel locomotive operator (over 10 and up to and including 30 tons)
GROUP 5: Backhoe operator (up to and including 3/4 yd.); Small Ford, Case or similar; Drill doctor; Grouting machine operator; Heading shield operator; Heavy-duty repairperson; Loader operator (Athey, Euclid, Sierra and similar types); Mucking machine operator (1/4 yd., rubber-tired, rail or track type); Pneumatic concrete placing machine operator (Hackley-Presswell or similar type); Pneumatic heading
shield (tunnel); Pumpcrete gun operator; Tractor compressor drill combination operator; Tugger hoist operator (2 drum); Tunnel locomotive operator (over 30 tons)
Agreement 1300-20
GROUP 6: Heavy Duty Repairman
GROUP 7: Tunnel mole boring machine operator

ENGINEERS ZONES
$1.00 additional per hour for all of IMPERIAL County and the portions of KERN, RIVERSIDE & SAN BERNARDINO Counties as defined below:

That area within the following Boundary: Begin in San
Bernardino County, approximately 3 miles NE of the intersection of I-15 and the California State line at that point which is the NW corner of Section 1, T17N,m R14E, San Bernardino Meridian. Continue W in a straight line to that point which is the SW corner of the northwest quarter of Section 6, T27S, R42E, Mt. Diablo Meridian. Continue North to the intersection with the Inyo County Boundary at that point which is the NE corner of the western half of the northern quarter of Section 6, T25S, R42E, MDM. Continue W along the Inyo and San
Bernardino County boundary until the intersection with Kern County, as that point which is the SE corner of Section 34, T24S, R40E, MDM. Continue W along the Inyo and Kern County boundary until the intersection with Tulare County, at that point which is the SW corner of the SE quarter of Section 32, T24S, R37E, MDM. Continue W along the Kern and Tulare County boundary, until that point which is the NW corner of T25S, R32E, MDM. Continue S following R32E lines to the NW corner of T31S, R32E, MDM. Continue W to the NW corner of T31S, R31E, MDM. Continue S to the SW corner of T32S, R31E, MDM. Continue W to SW corner of SE quarter of Section 34, T32S, R30E, MDM.

Continue S to SW corner of T11N, R17W, SBM. Continue E along south boundary of T11N, SBM to SW corner of T11N, R7W, SBM.

Continue S to SW corner of T9N, R7W, SBM. Continue E along south boundary of T9N, SBM to SW corner of T9N, R1E, SBM.

Continue S along west boundary of R1E, SMB to Riverside County line at the SW corner of T1S, R1E, SBM. Continue E along south boundary of T1s, SBM (Riverside County Line) to SW corner of T1S, R10E, SBM. Continue S along west boundary of R10E, SBM to Imperial County line at the SW corner of T8S, R10E, SBM.

Continue W along Imperial and Riverside county line to NW corner of T9S, R9E, SBM. Continue S along the boundary between Imperial and San Diego Counties, along the west edge of R9E, SBM to the south boundary of Imperial County/California state line. Follow the California state line west to Arizona state line, then north to Nevada state line, then continuing NW back Agreement 1300-21
to start at the point which is the NW corner of Section 1, T17N, R14E, SBM
$1.00 additional per hour for portions of SAN LUIS OBISPO, KERN, SANTA BARBARA & VENTURA as defined below:

That area within the following Boundary: Begin approximately 5 miles north of the community of Cholame, on the Monterey County and San Luis Obispo County boundary at the NW corner of T25S, R16E, Mt. Diablo Meridian. Continue south along the west side of R16E to the SW corner of T30S, R16E, MDM. Continue E to SW corner of T30S, R17E, MDM. Continue S to SW corner of T31S, R17E, MDM. Continue E to SW corner of T31S, R18E, MDM.

Continue S along West side of R18E, MDM as it crosses into San Bernardino Meridian numbering area and becomes R30W. Follow the west side of R30W, SBM to the SW corner of T9N, R30W, SBM.

Continue E along the south edge of T9N, SBM to the Santa Barbara County and Ventura County boundary at that point whch is the SW corner of Section 34.T9N, R24W, SBM, continue S along the Ventura County line to that point which is the SW corner of the SE quarter of Section 32, T7N, R24W, SBM. Continue E along the south edge of T7N, SBM to the SE corner to T7N, R21W, SBM. Continue N along East side of R21W, SBM to Ventura County and Kern County boundary at the NE corner of T8N, R21W.

Continue W along the Ventura County and Kern County boundary to the SE corner of T9N, R21W. Continue North along the East edge of R21W, SBM to the NE corner of T12N, R21W, SBM. Continue West along the north edge of T12N, SBM to the SE corner of T32S, R21E, MDM. [T12N SBM is a think strip between T11N SBM and T32S MDM]. Continue North along the East side of R21E, MDM to the Kings County and Kern County border at the NE corner of T25S, R21E, MDM, continue West along the Kings County and Kern County Boundary until the intersection of San Luis Obispo County. Continue west along the Kings County and San Luis Obispo County boundary until the intersection with Monterey County. Continue West along the Monterey County and San Luis Obispo County boundary to the beginning point at the NW corner of T25S, R16E, MDM.
$2.00 additional per hour for INYO and MONO Counties and the Northern portion of SAN BERNARDINO County as defined below:

That area within the following Boundary: Begin at the
intersection of the northern boundary of Mono County and the California state line at the point which is the center of Agreement 1300-22
Section 17, T10N, R22E, Mt. Diablo Meridian. Continue S then SE along the entire western boundary of Mono County, until it reaches Inyo County at the point which is the NE corner of the Western half of the NW quarter of Section 2, T8S, R29E, MDM.

Continue SSE along the entire western boundary of Inyo County, until the intersection with Kern County at the point which is the SW corner of the SE 1/4 of Section 32, T24S, R37E, MDM.

Continue E along the Inyo and Kern County boundary until the intersection with San Bernardino County at that point which is the SE corner of section 34, T24S, R40E, MDM. Continue E along the Inyo and San Bernardino County boundary until the point which is the NE corner of the Western half of the NW quarter of Section 6, T25S, R42E, MDM. Continue S to that point which is the SW corner of the NW quarter of Section 6, T27S, R42E, MDM.

Continue E in a straight line to the California and Nevada state border at the point which is the NW corner of Section 1, T17N, R14E, San Bernardino Meridian. Then continue NW along the state line to the starting point, which is the center of Section 18, T10N, R22E, MDM.

REMAINING AREA NOT DEFINED ABOVE RECIEVES BASE RATE
---------------------------------------------------------------- IRON0433-006 01/01/2024
Rates Fringes

IRONWORKER
Fence Erector...............$ 42.53 26.26
Ornamental, Reinforcing
and Structural..............$ 47.45 34.90
PREMIUM PAY:
$9.00 additional per hour at the following locations:

China Lake Naval Test Station, Chocolate Mountains Naval Reserve-Niland,
Edwards AFB, Fort Irwin Military Station, Fort Irwin Training Center-Goldstone, San Clemente Island, San Nicholas Island, Susanville Federal Prison, 29 Palms - Marine Corps, U.S. Marine Base - Barstow, U.S. Naval Air Facility - Sealey, Vandenberg AFB Army Defense Language Institute - Monterey, Fallon Air Base, Naval Post Graduate School - Monterey, Yermo Marine Corps Logistics Center
Agreement 1300-23
Port Hueneme, Port Mugu, U.S. Coast Guard Station - Two Rock ---------------------------------------------------------------- * LABO0300-005 07/01/2024
Rates Fringes
Asbestos Removal Laborer.........$ 43.88 25.13
SCOPE OF WORK: Includes site mobilization, initial site cleanup, site preparation, removal of asbestos-containing material and toxic waste, encapsulation, enclosure and
disposal of asbestos- containing materials and toxic waste by hand or with equipment or machinery; scaffolding,
fabrication of temporary wooden barriers and assembly of decontamination stations.
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0345-001 07/01/2022
Rates Fringes

LABORER (GUNITE)
GROUP 1.....................$ 48.50 21.37
GROUP 2.....................$ 47.55 21.37
GROUP 3.....................$ 44.01 21.37
FOOTNOTE: GUNITE PREMIUM PAY: Workers working from a
Bosn'n's Chair or suspended from a rope or cable shall
receive 40 cents per hour above the foregoing applicable classification rates. Workers doing gunite and/or
shotcrete work in a tunnel shall receive 35 cents per hour above the foregoing applicable classification rates, paid on a portal-to-portal basis. Any work performed on, in or above any smoke stack, silo, storage elevator or similar type of structure, when such structure is in excess of
75'-0"" above base level and which work must be performed in whole or in part more than 75'-0"" above base level, that work performed above the 75'-0"" level shall be compensated for at 35 cents per hour above the applicable
classification wage rate.

GUNITE LABORER CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Rodmen, Nozzlemen
Agreement 1300-24
GROUP 2: Gunmen
GROUP 3: Reboundmen
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO1184-001 07/01/2022
Rates Fringes
Laborers: (HORIZONTAL

DIRECTIONAL DRILLING)
(1) Drilling Crew Laborer...$ 40.69 18.25
(2) Vehicle Operator/Hauler.$ 40.86 18.25
(3) Horizontal Directional
Drill Operator..............$ 42.71 18.25
(4) Electronic Tracking
Locator.....................$ 44.71 18.25
Laborers: (STRIPING/SLURRY
SEAL)
GROUP 1.....................$ 41.90 21.32
GROUP 2.....................$ 43.20 21.32
GROUP 3.....................$ 45.21 21.32
GROUP 4.....................$ 46.95 21.32

LABORERS - STRIPING CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Protective coating, pavement sealing, including repair and filling of cracks by any method on any surface in parking lots, game courts and playgrounds; carstops; operation of all related machinery and equipment; equipment repair technician
GROUP 2: Traffic surface abrasive blaster; pot tender - removal of all traffic lines and markings by any method (sandblasting, waterblasting, grinding, etc.) and
preparation of surface for coatings. Traffic control
person: controlling and directing traffic through both
conventional and moving lane closures; operation of all related machinery and equipment
GROUP 3: Traffic delineating device applicator: Layout and application of pavement markers, delineating signs, rumble and traffic bars, adhesives, guide markers, other traffic delineating devices including traffic control. This
category includes all traffic related surface preparation Agreement 1300-25
(sandblasting, waterblasting, grinding) as part of the
application process. Traffic protective delineating system installer: removes, relocates, installs, permanently
affixed roadside and parking delineation barricades,
fencing, cable anchor, guard rail, reference signs,
monument markers; operation of all related machinery and equipment; power broom sweeper
GROUP 4: Striper: layout and application of traffic stripes and markings; hot thermo plastic; tape traffic stripes and markings, including traffic control; operation of all
related machinery and equipment
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO1184-002 07/01/2022
Rates Fringes

LABORER (TUNNEL)
GROUP 1.....................$ 45.68 23.30
GROUP 2.....................$ 46.00 23.30
GROUP 3.....................$ 46.46 23.30
GROUP 4.....................$ 47.15 23.30

LABORER
GROUP 1.....................$ 36.39 21.04
GROUP 2.....................$ 36.94 21.04
GROUP 3.....................$ 37.49 21.04
GROUP 4.....................$ 39.04 21.04
GROUP 5.....................$ 39.39 21.04

LABORER CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Cleaning and handling of panel forms; Concrete screeding for rough strike-off; Concrete, water curing; Demolition laborer, the cleaning of brick if performed by a worker performing any other phase of demolition work, and the cleaning of lumber; Fire watcher, limber, brush loader, piler and debris handler; Flag person; Gas, oil and/or
water pipeline laborer; Laborer, asphalt-rubber material loader; Laborer, general or construction; Laborer, general clean-up; Laborer, landscaping; Laborer, jetting; Laborer, temporary water and air lines; Material hose operator
(walls, slabs, floors and decks); Plugging, filling of shee bolt holes; Dry packing of concrete; Railroad maintenance, repair track person and road beds; Streetcar and railroad construction track laborers; Rigging and signaling; Scaler; Agreement 1300-26
Slip form raiser; Tar and mortar; Tool crib or tool house laborer; Traffic control by any method; Window cleaner; Wire mesh pulling - all concrete pouring operations
GROUP 2: Asphalt shoveler; Cement dumper (on 1 yd. or larger mixer and handling bulk cement); Cesspool digger and
installer; Chucktender; Chute handler, pouring concrete, the handling of the chute from readymix trucks, such as walls, slabs, decks, floors, foundation, footings, curbs, gutters and sidewalks; Concrete curer, impervious membrane and form oiler; Cutting torch operator (demolition); Fine grader, highways and street paving, airport, runways and similar type heavy construction; Gas, oil and/or water
pipeline wrapper - pot tender and form person; Guinea
chaser; Headerboard person - asphalt; Laborer, packing rod steel and pans; Membrane vapor barrier installer; Power broom sweeper (small); Riprap stonepaver, placing stone or wet sacked concrete; Roto scraper and tiller; Sandblaster (pot tender); Septic tank digger and installer(lead); Tank scaler and cleaner; Tree climber, faller, chain saw
operator, Pittsburgh chipper and similar type brush
shredder; Underground laborer, including caisson bellower GROUP 3: Buggymobile person; Concrete cutting torch; Concrete pile cutter; Driller, jackhammer, 2-1/2 ft. drill steel or longer; Dri-pak-it machine; Gas, oil and/or water pipeline wrapper, 6-in. pipe and over, by any method, inside and out; High scaler (including drilling of same); Hydro seeder and similar type; Impact wrench multi-plate; Kettle person, pot person and workers applying asphalt, lay-kold,
creosote, lime caustic and similar type materials
(""applying"" means applying, dipping, brushing or handling of such materials for pipe wrapping and waterproofing); Operator of pneumatic, gas, electric tools, vibrating
machine, pavement breaker, air blasting, come-alongs, and similar mechanical tools not separately classified herein; Pipelayer's backup person, coating, grouting, making of joints, sealing, caulking, diapering and including rubber gasket joints, pointing and any and all other services; Rock slinger; Rotary scarifier or multiple head concrete chipping scarifier; Steel headerboard and guideline setter; Tamper, Barko, Wacker and similar type; Trenching machine, hand-propelled
GROUP 4: Asphalt raker, lute person, ironer, asphalt dump person, and asphalt spreader boxes (all types); Concrete Agreement 1300-27
core cutter (walls, floors or ceilings), grinder or sander; Concrete saw person, cutting walls or flat work, scoring old or new concrete; Cribber, shorer, lagging, sheeting and trench bracing, hand-guided lagging hammer; Head rock
slinger; Laborer, asphalt- rubber distributor boot person; Laser beam in connection with laborers' work; Oversize
concrete vibrator operator, 70 lbs. and over; Pipelayer performing all services in the laying and installation of pipe from the point of receiving pipe in the ditch until completion of operation, including any and all forms of tubular material, whether pipe, metallic or non-metallic, conduit and any other stationary type of tubular device used for the conveying of any substance or element, whether water, sewage, solid gas, air, or other product whatsoever and without regard to the nature of material from which the tubular material is fabricated; No-joint pipe and stripping of same; Prefabricated manhole installer; Sandblaster
(nozzle person), water blasting, Porta Shot-Blast
GROUP 5: Blaster powder, all work of loading holes, placing and blasting of all powder and explosives of whatever type, regardless of method used for such loading and placing; Driller: All power drills, excluding jackhammer, whether core, diamond, wagon, track, multiple unit, and any and all other types of mechanical drills without regard to the form of motive power; Toxic waste removal

TUNNEL LABORER CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Batch plant laborer; Changehouse person; Dump
person; Dump person (outside); Swamper (brake person and switch person on tunnel work); Tunnel materials handling person; Nipper; Pot tender, using mastic or other materials (for example, but not by way of limitation, shotcrete, etc.) GROUP 2: Chucktender, cabletender; Loading and unloading agitator cars; Vibrator person, jack hammer, pneumatic
tools (except driller); Bull gang mucker, track person; Concrete crew, including rodder and spreader
GROUP 3: Blaster, driller, powder person; Chemical grout jet person; Cherry picker person; Grout gun person; Grout mixer person; Grout pump person; Jackleg miner; Jumbo person; Kemper and other pneumatic concrete placer operator; Miner, tunnel (hand or machine); Nozzle person; Operating of
troweling and/or grouting machines; Powder person (primer Agreement 1300-28
house); Primer person; Sandblaster; Shotcrete person; Steel form raiser and setter; Timber person, retimber person, wood or steel; Tunnel Concrete finisher
GROUP 4: Diamond driller; Sandblaster; Shaft and raise work ---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO1184-004 07/01/2022
Rates Fringes
Brick Tender.....................$ 37.32 21.45
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO1414-001 08/03/2022
Rates Fringes

LABORER
PLASTER CLEAN-UP LABORER....$ 38.92 23.32
PLASTER TENDER..............$ 41.47 23.32
Work on a swing stage scaffold: $1.00 per hour additional. ---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN0036-001 07/01/2023
Rates Fringes
Painters: (Including Lead
Abatement)
(1) Repaint (excludes San
Diego County)...............$ 29.59 17.12
(2) All Other Work..........$ 38.52 18.64
REPAINT of any previously painted structure. Exceptions:
work involving the aerospace industry, breweries,
commercial recreational facilities, hotels which operate commercial establishments as part of hotel service, and sports facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN0036-008 09/01/2022
Rates Fringes
DRYWALL FINISHER/TAPER...........$ 46.28 23.52
---------------------------------------------------------------- Agreement 1300-29
PAIN0036-015 01/01/2020
Rates Fringes
GLAZIER..........................$ 43.45 23.39
FOOTNOTE: Additional $1.25 per hour for work in a condor, from the third (3rd) floor and up Additional $1.25 per
hour for work on the outside of the building from a swing stage or any suspended contrivance, from the ground up
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLAS0200-009 08/03/2022
Rates Fringes
PLASTERER........................$ 47.37 19.64
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLAS0500-002 07/01/2023
Rates Fringes
CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 44.00 27.11
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLUM0016-001 09/01/2023
Rates Fringes

PLUMBER/PIPEFITTER
Work ONLY on new additions
and remodeling of bars,
restaurant, stores and
commercial buildings not
to exceed 5,000 sq. ft. of
floor space.................$ 53.51 25.28
Work ONLY on strip malls,
light commercial, tenant
improvement and remodel
work........................$ 42.49 23.86
All other work except work
on new additions and
remodeling of bars,
restaurant, stores and
commercial buildings not
to exceed 5,000 sq. ft. of
floor space and work on
Agreement 1300-30
strip malls, light
commercial, tenant
improvement and remodel
work........................$ 57.18 26.51
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLUM0345-001 09/01/2023
Rates Fringes

PLUMBER
Landscape/Irrigation Fitter.$ 40.20 25.90
Sewer & Storm Drain Work....$ 44.29 23.28
---------------------------------------------------------------- ROOF0036-002 08/13/2023
Rates Fringes
ROOFER...........................$ 46.02 20.05
FOOTNOTE: Pitch premium: Work on which employees are exposed to pitch fumes or required to handle pitch, pitch base or pitch impregnated products, or any material containing coal tar pitch, the entire roofing crew shall receive $1.75 per hour ""pitch premium"" pay.
---------------------------------------------------------------- SFCA0669-002 01/01/2024
Rates Fringes
SPRINKLER FITTER.................$ 45.31 27.91
---------------------------------------------------------------- SHEE0105-003 07/01/2024
LOS ANGELES (South of a straight line drawn between Gorman and Big Pines)and Catalina Island, INYO, KERN (Northeast part, East of Hwy 395), MONO ORANGE, RIVERSIDE, AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES Rates Fringes

SHEET METAL WORKER
(1) Commercial - New
Construction and Remodel
work........................$ 59.40 30.34
(2) Industrial work
Agreement 1300-31
including air pollution
control systems, noise
abatement, hand rails,
guard rails, excluding
aritechtural sheet metal
work, excluding A-C,
heating, ventilating
systems for human comfort...$ 56.95 30.04
---------------------------------------------------------------- TEAM0011-002 07/01/2023
Rates Fringes

TRUCK DRIVER
GROUP 1....................$ 38.19 33.69
GROUP 2....................$ 38.34 33.69
GROUP 3....................$ 38.47 33.69
GROUP 4....................$ 38.66 33.69
GROUP 5....................$ 38.69 33.69
GROUP 6....................$ 38.72 33.69
GROUP 7....................$ 38.97 33.69
GROUP 8....................$ 39.22 33.69
GROUP 9....................$ 39.42 33.69
GROUP 10....................$ 39.72 33.69
GROUP 11....................$ 40.22 33.69
GROUP 12....................$ 40.65 33.69
WORK ON ALL MILITARY BASES:

PREMIUM PAY: $3.00 per hour additional.
[29 palms Marine Base, Camp Roberts, China Lake, Edwards AFB, El Centro Naval Facility, Fort Irwin, Marine Corps
Logistics Base at Nebo & Yermo, Mountain Warfare Training Center, Bridgeport, Point Arguello, Point Conception,
Vandenberg AFB]

TRUCK DRIVERS CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Truck driver
GROUP 2: Driver of vehicle or combination of vehicles - 2 axles; Traffic control pilot car excluding moving heavy equipment permit load; Truck mounted broom
GROUP 3: Driver of vehicle or combination of vehicles - 3 Agreement 1300-32
axles; Boot person; Cement mason distribution truck; Fuel truck driver; Water truck - 2 axle; Dump truck, less than 16 yds. water level; Erosion control driver
GROUP 4: Driver of transit mix truck, under 3 yds.; Dumpcrete truck, less than 6-1/2 yds. water level
GROUP 5: Water truck, 3 or more axles; Truck greaser and tire person ($0.50 additional for tire person); Pipeline and utility working truck driver, including winch truck and plastic fusion, limited to pipeline and utility work;
Slurry truck driver
GROUP 6: Transit mix truck, 3 yds. or more; Dumpcrete truck, 6-1/2 yds. water level and over; Vehicle or combination of vehicles - 4 or more axles; Oil spreader truck; Dump truck, 16 yds. to 25 yds. water level
GROUP 7: A Frame, Swedish crane or similar; Forklift driver; Ross carrier driver
GROUP 8: Dump truck, 25 yds. to 49 yds. water level; Truck repair person; Water pull - single engine; Welder
GROUP 9: Truck repair person/welder; Low bed driver, 9 axles or over
GROUP 10: Dump truck - 50 yds. or more water level; Water pull - single engine with attachment
GROUP 11: Water pull - twin engine; Water pull - twin engine with attachments; Winch truck driver - $1.25 additional when operating winch or similar special attachments
GROUP 12: Boom Truck 17K and above
---------------------------------------------------------------- WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing
operation to which welding is incidental.
================================================================ Note: Executive Order (EO) 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any Agreement 1300-33
solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2017. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must provide employees with 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours they work, up to 56 hours of paid sick leave each year.

Employees must be permitted to use paid sick leave for their own illness, injury or other health-related needs, including preventive care; to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is ill, injured, or has other health-related needs, including preventive care; or for reasons resulting from, or to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is a victim of, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at
https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/government-contracts.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (iii)).
---------------------------------------------------------------- The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order of ""identifiers"" that indicate whether the particular rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate for local), a survey rate (weighted average rate) or a union average rate (weighted union average rate).

Union Rate Identifiers
A four letter classification abbreviation identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than ""SU"" or ""UAVG"" denotes that the union classification and rate were prevailing for that classification in the survey. Example:

PLUM0198-005 07/01/2014. PLUM is an abbreviation identifier of the union which prevailed in the survey for this
classification, which in this example would be Plumbers. 0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing Agreement 1300-34
the wage determination. 07/01/2014 is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate, which in this example is July 1, 2014.

Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all rate changes in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing this classification and rate.

Survey Rate Identifiers
Classifications listed under the ""SU"" identifier indicate that no one rate prevailed for this classification in the survey and the published rate is derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in the survey for that classification. As this weighted average rate includes all rates reported in the survey, it may include both union and non-union rates. Example: SULA2012-007 5/13/2014. SU indicates the rates are survey rates based on a weighted average
calculation of rates and are not majority rates. LA indicates the State of Louisiana. 2012 is the year of survey on which these classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 5/13/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

Survey wage rates are not updated and remain in effect until a new survey is conducted.

Union Average Rate Identifiers
Classification(s) listed under the UAVG identifier indicate that no single majority rate prevailed for those
classifications; however, 100% of the data reported for the classifications was union data. EXAMPLE: UAVG-OH-0010
08/29/2014. UAVG indicates that the rate is a weighted union average rate. OH indicates the state. The next number, 0010 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 08/29/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

A UAVG rate will be updated once a year, usually in January of each year, to reflect a weighted average of the current negotiated/CBA rate of the union locals from which the rate is based.

State Adopted Rate Identifiers
Agreement 1300-35
Classifications listed under the ""SA"" identifier indicate that the prevailing wage rate set by a state (or local) government was adopted under 29 C.F.R §1.3(g)-(h). Example: SAME2023-007 01/03/2024. SA reflects that the rates are state adopted. ME refers to the State of Maine. 2023 is the year during which the state completed the survey on which the listed classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 01/03/2024 reflects the date on which the classifications and rates under the ?SA? identifier took effect under state law in the state from which the rates were adopted.
----------------------------------------------------------------

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS

1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:
* an existing published wage determination
* a survey underlying a wage determination
* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter
* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour National Office because National Office has responsibility for the Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.) and 3.) should be followed.

With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations
Wage and Hour Division
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator Agreement 1300-36
(See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:

Wage and Hour Administrator
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210
The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.

3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Administrative Review Board
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final. ================================================================ END OF GENERAL DECISION"
Agreement 1300-31

EXHIBIT B TO CONTRACT
REQUIRED CONTRACT PROVISIONS FHWA-1273 – Revised October 23, 2023

FEDERAL-AID CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
I. General
II. Nondiscrimination
III. Non-segregated Facilities
IV. Davis-Bacon and Related Act Provisions
V. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act
Provisions
VI. Subletting or Assigning the Contract
VII. Safety: Accident Prevention
VIII. False Statements Concerning Highway Projects
IX. Implementation of Clean Air Act and Federal Water
Pollution Control Act
X. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion
XI. Certification Regarding Use of Contract Funds for
Lobbying
XII. Use of United States-Flag Vessels:

ATTACHMENTS
A. Employment and Materials Preference for Appalachian
Development Highway System or Appalachian Local Access
Road Contracts (included in Appalachian contracts only) I. GENERAL

1. Form FHWA-1273 must be physically incorporated in each construction contract funded under title 23, United States Code, as required in 23 CFR 633.102(b) (excluding emergency contracts solely intended for debris removal). The contractor (or subcontractor) must insert this form in each subcontract and further require its inclusion in all lower tier subcontracts (excluding purchase orders, rental agreements and other agreements for supplies or services). 23 CFR 633.102(e).

The applicable requirements of Form FHWA-1273 are
incorporated by reference for work done under any purchase order, rental agreement or agreement for other services. The prime contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor, lower-tier subcontractor or service provider. 23 CFR 633.102(e).

Form FHWA-1273 must be included in all Federal-aid designbuild contracts, in all subcontracts and in lower tier subcontracts (excluding subcontracts for design services, purchase orders, rental agreements and other agreements for supplies or services) in accordance with 23 CFR 633.102. The design-builder shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor, lower-tier subcontractor or service provider.

Contracting agencies may reference Form FHWA-1273 in
solicitation-for-bids or request-for-proposals documents, however, the Form FHWA-1273 must be physically incorporated (not referenced) in all contracts, subcontracts and lower-tier subcontracts (excluding purchase orders, rental agreements and other agreements for supplies or services related to a
construction contract). 23 CFR 633.102(b).

2. Subject to the applicability criteria noted in the following sections, these contract provisions shall apply to all work performed on the contract by the contractor's own organization and with the assistance of workers under the contractor's immediate superintendence and to all work performed on the contract by piecework, station work, or by subcontract. 23 CFR 633.102(d).

3. A breach of any of the stipulations contained in these Required Contract Provisions may be sufficient grounds for withholding of progress payments, withholding of final payment,
termination of the contract, suspension / debarment or any other action determined to be appropriate by the contracting agency and FHWA.

4. Selection of Labor: During the performance of this contract, the contractor shall not use convict labor for any purpose within the limits of a construction project on a Federal-aid highway unless it is labor performed by convicts who are on parole, supervised release, or probation. 23 U.S.C. 114(b). The term Federal-aid highway does not include roadways functionally classified as local roads or rural minor collectors. 23 U.S.C. 101(a).

II. NONDISCRIMINATION (23 CFR 230.107(a); 23 CFR Part
230, Subpart A, Appendix A; EO 11246)
The provisions of this section related to 23 CFR Part 230, Subpart A, Appendix A are applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related construction subcontracts of $10,000 or more. The provisions of 23 CFR Part 230 are not applicable to material supply, engineering, or architectural service contracts.

In addition, the contractor and all subcontractors must comply with the following policies: Executive Order 11246, 41 CFR Part 60, 29 CFR Parts 1625-1627, 23 U.S.C. 140, Section 504
of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 794), Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), and related regulations including 49 CFR Parts 21, 26, and 27; and 23 CFR Parts 200, 230, and 633.

The contractor and all subcontractors must comply with: the requirements of the Equal Opportunity Clause in 41 CFR 60-

1.4(b) and, for all construction contracts exceeding $10,000, the Standard Federal Equal Employment Opportunity
Construction Contract Specifications in 41 CFR 60-4.3.

Note: The U.S. Department of Labor has exclusive authority to determine compliance with Executive Order 11246 and the policies of the Secretary of Labor including 41 CFR Part 60, and 29 CFR Parts 1625-1627. The contracting agency and the
FHWA have the authority and the responsibility to ensure compliance with 23 U.S.C. 140, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 794), and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), and related regulations including 49 CFR Parts 21, 26, and 27; and 23 CFR Parts 200, 230, and 633.

The following provision is adopted from 23 CFR Part 230, Subpart A, Appendix A, with appropriate revisions to conform to the U.S. Department of Labor (US DOL) and FHWA
requirements.

Agreement 1300-32

1. Equal Employment Opportunity: Equal Employment
Opportunity (EEO) requirements not to discriminate and to take affirmative action to assure equal opportunity as set forth under laws, executive orders, rules, regulations (see 28 CFR Part 35, 29 CFR Part 1630, 29 CFR Parts 1625-1627, 41 CFR Part 60 and 49 CFR Part 27) and orders of the Secretary of Labor as modified by the provisions prescribed herein, and imposed pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 140, shall constitute the EEO and specific affirmative action standards for the contractor's project activities under this contract. The provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) set forth under 28 CFR Part 35 and 29 CFR Part 1630 are incorporated by reference in this contract. In the execution of this contract, the contractor agrees to comply with the following minimum specific requirement activities ofEEO:
a. The contractor will work with the contracting agency and the Federal Government to ensure that it has made every good faith effort to provide equal opportunity with respect to all of its terms and conditions of employment and in their review of activities under the contract. 23 CFR 230.409 (g)(4) & (5). b. The contractor will accept as its operating policy the following statement:
"It is the policy of this Company to assure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, color, national origin, age or disability. Such action shall include: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship, preapprenticeship, and/or on-the-job training."

2. EEO Officer: The contractor will designate and make known to the contracting officers an EEO Officer who will have the responsibility for and must be capable of effectively
administering and promoting an active EEO program and who must be assigned adequate authority and responsibility to do so.

3. Dissemination of Policy: All members of the contractor's staff who are authorized to hire, supervise, promote, and discharge employees, or who recommend such action or are
substantially involved in such action, will be made fully cognizant of and will implement the contractor's EEO policy and contractual responsibilities to provide EEO in each grade and classification of employment. To ensure that the above agreement will be met, the following actions will be taken as a minimum:
a. Periodic meetings of supervisory and personnel office employees will be conducted before the start of work and then not less often than once every six months, at which time the contractor's EEO policy and its implementation will be reviewed and explained. The meetings will be conducted by the EEO Officer or other knowledgeable company official.
b. All new supervisory or personnel office employees will be given a thorough indoctrination by the EEO Officer, covering all major aspects of the contractor's EEO obligations within thirty days following their reporting for duty with the contractor. c. All personnel who are engaged in direct recruitment for the project will be instructed by the EEO Officer in the contractor's procedures for locating and hiring minorities and women.
d. Notices and posters setting forth the contractor's EEO policy will be placed in areas readily accessible to employees, applicants for employment and potential employees.
e. The contractor's EEO policy and the procedures to
implement such policy will be brought to the attention of employees by means of meetings, employee handbooks, or
other appropriate means.

4. Recruitment: When advertising for employees, the contractor will include in all advertisements for employees the notation:
"An Equal Opportunity Employer." All such advertisements will be placed in publications having a large circulation among minorities and women in the area from which the project work force would normally be derived.
a. The contractor will, unless precluded by a valid
bargaining agreement, conduct systematic and direct
recruitment through public and private employee referral sources likely to yield qualified minorities and women. To meet this requirement, the contractor will identify sources of potential minority group employees and establish with such identified sources procedures whereby minority and women applicants may be referred to the contractor for employment consideration.
b. In the event the contractor has a valid bargaining
agreement providing for exclusive hiring hall referrals, the contractor is expected to observe the provisions of that agreement to the extent that the system meets thecontractor's compliance with EEO contract provisions. Where
implementation of such an agreement has the effect of
discriminating against minorities or women, or obligates the contractor to do the same, such implementation violates Federal nondiscriminationprovisions.
c. The contractor will encourage its present employeesto refer minorities and women as applicants for employment.

Information and procedures with regard to referring such applicants will be discussed withemployees.

5. Personnel Actions: Wages, working conditions, and
employee benefits shall be established and administered, and personnel actions of every type, including hiring, upgrading, promotion, transfer, demotion, layoff, and termination, shall be taken without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age or disability.

The following procedures shall befollowed:
a. The contractor will conduct periodic inspections of project sites to ensure that working conditions and employee facilities do not indicate discriminatory treatment of project site personnel.
b. The contractor will periodically evaluate the spread of wages paid within each classification to determine any
evidence of discriminatory wagepractices.
c. The contractor will periodically review selected personnel actions in depth to determine whether there is evidence of discrimination. Where evidence is found, the contractor will promptly take corrective action. If the review indicates that the discrimination may extend beyond the actions reviewed, such corrective action shall include all affected persons.
d. The contractor will promptly investigate all complaints of alleged discrimination made to the contractor in connection with its obligations under this contract, will attempt to resolve such complaints, and will take appropriate corrective action Agreement 1300-33
within a reasonable time. If the investigation indicates that the discrimination may affect persons other than the complainant, such corrective action shall include such other persons. Upon completion of each investigation, the contractor will inform every complainant of all of their avenues of appeal.

6. Training and Promotion:
a. The contractor will assist in locating, qualifying, and increasing the skills of minorities and women who are
applicants for employment or current employees. Such efforts should be aimed at developing full journey level status employees in the type of trade or job classification involved. b. Consistent with the contractor's work force requirements and as permissible under Federal and State regulations, the contractor shall make full use of training programs (i.e., apprenticeship and on-the-job training programs for the geographical area of contract performance). In the event a special provision for training is provided under this contract, this subparagraph will be superseded as indicated in the special provision. The contracting agency may reserve
training positions for persons who receive welfare assistance in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 140(a).
c. The contractor will advise employees and applicants for employment of available training programs and entrance
requirements for each.
d. The contractor will periodically review the training and promotion potential of employees who are minorities and women and will encourage eligible employees to apply for such training and promotion.

7. Unions: If the contractor relies in whole or in part upon unions as a source of employees, the contractor will use good faith efforts to obtain the cooperation of such unions to increase opportunities for minorities and women. 23 CFR
230.409. Actions by the contractor, either directly or through a contractor's association acting as agent, will include the procedures set forth below:
a. The contractor will use good faith efforts to develop, in cooperation with the unions, joint training programs aimed toward qualifying more minorities and women for membership in the unions and increasing the skills of minorities and women so that they may qualify for higher payingemployment.
b. The contractor will use good faith efforts to incorporate an EEO clause into each union agreement to the end that such union will be contractually bound to refer applicants without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age, or disability.
c. The contractor is to obtain information as to the referral practices and policies of the labor union except that to the extent such information is within the exclusive possession of the labor union and such labor union refuses to furnish such information to the contractor, the contractor shall so certify to the contracting agency and shall set forth what efforts have been made to obtain suchinformation.
d. In the event the union is unable to provide the contractor with a reasonable flow of referrals within the time limit set forth in the collective bargaining agreement, the contractor will, through independent recruitment efforts, fill the employment vacancies without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age, or disability; making full efforts to obtain qualified and/or qualifiable minorities and women. The failure of a union to provide sufficient referrals (even though it is obligated to provide exclusive referrals under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement) does not relieve the contractor from the
requirements of this paragraph. In the event the union referral practice prevents the contractor from meeting the obligations pursuant to Executive Order 11246, as amended, and these special provisions, such contractor shall immediately notify the contracting agency.

8. Reasonable Accommodation for Applicants / Employees
with Disabilities: The contractor must be familiar with the requirements for and comply with the Americans with
Disabilities Act and all rules and regulations established thereunder. Employers must provide reasonable
accommodation in all employment activities unless to do so would cause an undue hardship.

9. Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment: The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age, or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract.
a. The contractor shall notify all potential subcontractors, suppliers, and lessors of their EEO obligations under this contract.
b. The contractor will use good faith efforts toensure
subcontractor compliance with their EEOobligations.

10. Assurances Required:
a. The requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 and the State
DOT’s FHWA-approved Disadvantaged BusinessEnterprise
(DBE) program are incorporated byreference.
b. The contractor, subrecipient or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR part 26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy as the recipient deems
appropriate, which may include, but is not limited to:
(1) Withholding monthly progress payments;
(2) Assessing sanctions;
(3) Liquidated damages; and/or
(4) Disqualifying the contractor from future bidding asnonresponsible. c. The Title VI and nondiscrimination provisions of U.S.

DOT Order 1050.2A at Appendixes A and E are incorporated by reference. 49 CFR Part 21.

11. Records and Reports: The contractor shall keep such records as necessary to document compliance with theEEO requirements. Such records shall be retained for a period of three years following the date of the final payment to the contractor for all contract work and shall be available at reasonable times and places for inspection by authorized representatives of the contracting agency and the FHWA. a. The records kept by the contractor shall documentthe following:

Agreement 1300-34
(1) The number and work hours of minority and nonminority group members and women employed in each work classification on the project;
(2) The progress and efforts being made in cooperation
with unions, when applicable, to increase employment
opportunities for minorities and women; and
(3) The progress and efforts being made in locating, hiring, training, qualifying, and upgrading minorities and women. b. The contractors and subcontractors will submit an annual report to the contracting agency each July for the duration of the project indicating the number of minority, women, and nonminority group employees currently engaged in each work classification required by the contract work. This information is to be reported on Form FHWA-1391. The staffing data should represent the project work force on board in all or any part of the last payroll period preceding the end of July. If on-the-job training is being required by special provision, the contractor will be required to collect and report training data. The employment data should reflect the work force on board during all or any part of the last payroll period preceding the end of July.

III. NONSEGREGATED FACILITIES
This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related construction subcontracts of more than $10,000. 41 CFR 60-1.5.

As prescribed by 41 CFR 60-1.8, the contractor must ensure that facilities provided for employees are provided in such a manner that segregation on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin cannot result. The contractor may neither require such segregated use by written or oral policies nor tolerate such use by employee custom. The contractor's obligation extends further to ensure that its employees are not assigned to perform their services at any location under the contractor's control where the facilities are segregated. The term "facilities" includes waiting rooms, work areas, restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks, restrooms, washrooms, locker rooms and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots, drinking fountains, recreation or entertainment areas, transportation, and housing provided for employees. The contractor shall provide separate or single-user restrooms and necessary dressing or sleeping areas to assure privacy between sexes.

IV. DAVIS-BACON AND RELATED ACT PROVISIONS
This section is applicable to all Federal-aid construction projects exceeding $2,000 and to all related subcontracts and lower-tier subcontracts (regardless of subcontract size), in accordance with 29 CFR 5.5. The requirements apply to all projects located within the right-of-way of a roadway that is functionally classified as Federal-aid highway. 23 U.S.C. 113. This excludes roadways functionally classified as local roads or rural minor collectors, which are exempt. 23 U.S.C. 101.

Where applicable law requires that projects be treated as a project on a Federal-aid highway, the provisions of this subpart will apply regardless of the location of the project. Examples include:

Surface Transportation Block Grant Program projects funded under 23 U.S.C. 133 [excluding recreational trails projects], the Nationally Significant Freight and Highway
Projects funded under 23 U.S.C. 117, and National Highway Freight Program projects funded under 23 U.S.C. 167.

The following provisions are from the U.S. Department of Labor regulations in 29 CFR 5.5 “Contract provisions and related matters” with minor revisions to conform to the FHWA- 1273 format and FHWA program requirements.

1. Minimum wages (29 CFR 5.5)
a. Wage rates and fringe benefits. All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or otherwise working in construction or development of the project under a development statute), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of basic hourly wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof,
regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and
mechanics. As provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of 29 CFR

5.5, the appropriate wage determinations are effective by operation of law even if they have not been attached to the contract. Contributions made or costs reasonably anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits under the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141(2)(B)) on behalf of laborers or mechanics are considered wages paid to such laborers or mechanics, subject to the provisions of paragraph 1.e. of this section; also, regular contributions made or costs incurred for more than a weekly period (but not less often than quarterly) under plans, funds, or programs which cover the particular weekly period, are deemed to be constructively made or incurred during such weekly period. Such laborers and mechanics must be paid the
appropriate wage rate and fringe benefits on the wage
determination for the classification(s) of work actually performed, without regard to skill, except as provided in paragraph 4. of this section. Laborers or mechanics performing work in more than one classification may be compensated at the rate specified for each classification for the time actually worked therein: Provided, That the employer's payroll records accurately set forth the time spent in each classification in which work is performed. The wage determination (including any additional classifications and wage rates conformed under paragraph 1.c. of this section) and the Davis-Bacon poster (WH–1321) must be posted at all times by the contractor and its subcontractors at the site of the work in a prominent and accessible place where it can be easily seen by the workers. b. Frequently recurring classifications. (1) In addition to wage and fringe benefit rates that have been determined to be prevailing under the procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 1, a wage determination may contain, pursuant to § 1.3(f), wage and fringe benefit rates for classifications of laborers and mechanics for which conformance requests are regularly submitted
pursuant to paragraph 1.c. of this section, provided that:
(i) The work performed by the classification is not
performed by a classification in the wage determination for which a prevailing wage rate has been determined;
Agreement 1300-35
(ii) The classification is used in the area by the
construction industry; and
(iii) The wage rate for the classification bears a reasonable relationship to the prevailing wage rates contained in the wage determination.
(2) The Administrator will establish wage rates for such classifications in accordance with paragraph 1.c.(1)(iii) of this section. Work performed in such a classification must be paid at no less than the wage and fringe benefit rate listed on the wage determination for such classification.
c. Conformance. (1) The contracting officer must require that any class of laborers or mechanics, including helpers, which is not listed in the wage determination and which is to be employed under the contract be classified in conformance with the wage determination. Conformance of an additional
classification and wage rate and fringe benefits is appropriate only when the following criteria have been met:
(i) The work to be performed by the classification
requested is not performed by a classification in the wage determination; and
(ii) The classification is used in the area by the
construction industry; and
(iii) The proposed wage rate, including any bona fide fringe benefits, bears a reasonable relationship to the wage rates contained in the wage determination.
(2) The conformance process may not be used to split,
subdivide, or otherwise avoid application of classifications listed in the wage determination.
(3) If the contractor and the laborers and mechanics to be employed in the classification (if known), or their
representatives, and the contracting officer agree on the classification and wage rate (including the amount designated for fringe benefits where appropriate), a report of the action taken will be sent by the contracting officer by email to [email protected]. The Administrator, or an
authorized representative, will approve, modify, or disapprove every additional classification action within 30 days of receipt and so advise the contracting officer or will notify the contracting officer within the 30–day period that additional time is necessary.
(4) In the event the contractor, the laborers or mechanics to be employed in the classification or their representatives, and the contracting officer do not agree on the proposed
classification and wage rate (including the amount designated for fringe benefits, where appropriate), the contracting officer will, by email to [email protected], refer the
questions, including the views of all interested parties and the recommendation of the contracting officer, to the Administrator for determination. The Administrator, or an authorized
representative, will issue a determination within 30 days of receipt and so advise the contracting officer or will notify the contracting officer within the 30–day period that additional time is necessary.
(5) The contracting officer must promptly notify the
contractor of the action taken by the Wage and Hour Division under paragraphs 1.c.(3) and (4) of this section. The contractor must furnish a written copy of such determination to each affected worker or it must be posted as a part of the wage determination.

The wage rate (including fringe benefits where appropriate) determined pursuant to paragraph 1.c.(3) or (4) of this section must be paid to all workers performing work in the classification under this contract from the first day on which work is performed in the classification.
d. Fringe benefits not expressed as an hourly rate.

Whenever the minimum wage rate prescribed inthe contract for a class of laborers or mechanics includes a fringe benefit which is not expressed as an hourly rate, the contractor may either pay the benefit as stated in the wage determination or may pay another bona fide fringe benefit or an hourly cash equivalent thereof.
e. Unfunded plans. If the contractor does not make payments to a trustee or other third person, the contractor may consider as part of the wages of any laborer or mechanic the amount of any costs reasonably anticipated in providing bona fide fringe benefits under a plan or program, Provided, That the Secretary of Labor has found, upon the written request of the contractor, in accordance with the criteria set forth in
§ 5.28, that the applicable standards of the Davis-Bacon Act have been met. The Secretary of Labor may require the
contractor to set aside in a separate account assets for the meeting of obligations under the plan or program.
f. Interest. In the event of a failure to pay all or part of the wages required by the contract, the contractor will be required to pay interest on any underpayment of wages.

2. Withholding (29 CFR 5.5)
a. Withholding requirements. The contracting agency may, upon its own action, or must, upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor, withhold or cause to be withheld from the contractor so much of the accrued payments or advances as may be considered
necessary to satisfy the liabilities of the prime contractor or any subcontractor for the full amount of wages and monetary relief, including interest, required by the clauses set forth in this section for violations of this contract, or to satisfy any such liabilities required by any other Federal contract, or federally assisted contract subject to Davis-Bacon labor standards, that is held by the same prime contractor (as defined in § 5.2). The necessary funds may be withheld from the contractor under this contract, any other Federal contract with the same prime contractor, or any other federally assisted contract that is subject to Davis-Bacon labor standards requirements and is held by the same prime contractor, regardless of whether the other contract was awarded or assisted by the same agency, and such funds may be used to satisfy the contractor liability for which the funds were withheld. In the event of a contractor's failure to pay any laborer or mechanic, including any apprentice or helper working on the site of the work all or part of the wages required by the contract, or upon the contractor's failure to submit the required records as discussed in paragraph 3.d. of this section, the contracting agency may on its own initiative and after written notice to the contractor, take such action as may be necessary to cause the suspension of any further payment, advance, or guarantee of funds until such violations have ceased.
b. Priority to withheld funds. The Department has priority to funds withheld or to be withheld in accordance with paragraph Agreement 1300-36

2.a. of this section or Section V, paragraph 3.a., or both, over claims to those funds by:
(1) A contractor's surety(ies), including without limitation performance bond sureties and payment bond sureties;
(2) A contracting agency for its reprocurement costs;
(3) A trustee(s) (either a court-appointed trustee or a U.S. trustee, or both) in bankruptcy of a contractor, or a contractor's bankruptcy estate;
(4) A contractor's assignee(s);
(5) A contractor's successor(s); or
(6) A claim asserted under the Prompt Payment Act, 31
U.S.C. 3901–3907.

3. Records and certified payrolls (29 CFR 5.5)
a. Basic record requirements (1) Length of record retention.

All regular payrolls and other basic records must be maintained by the contractor and any subcontractor during the course of the work and preserved for all laborers and mechanics working at the site of the work (or otherwise working in construction or development of the project under a development statute) for a period of at least 3 years after all the work on the prime contract is completed.
(2) Information required. Such records must contain the name; Social Security number; last known address, telephone number, and email address of each such worker; each worker's correct classification(s) of work actually performed; hourly rates of wages paid (including rates of contributions or costs anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits or cash equivalents thereof of the types described in 40 U.S.C. 3141(2)(B) of the Davis-Bacon Act); daily and weekly number of hours actually worked in total and on each covered contract; deductions made; and actual wages paid.
(3) Additional records relating to fringe benefits. Whenever the Secretary of Labor has found under paragraph 1.e. of this section that the wages of any laborer or mechanic include the amount of any costs reasonably anticipated in providing benefits under a plan or program described in 40 U.S.C. 3141(2)(B) of the Davis-Bacon Act, the contractor must
maintain records which show that the commitment to provide such benefits is enforceable, that the plan or program is financially responsible, and that the plan or program has been communicated in writing to the laborers or mechanics affected, and records which show the costs anticipated or the actual cost incurred in providing such benefits.
(4) Additional records relating to apprenticeship. Contractors with apprentices working under approved programs must
maintain written evidence of the registration of apprenticeship programs, the registration of the apprentices, and the ratios and wage rates prescribed in the applicable programs.
b. Certified payroll requirements (1) Frequency and method of submission. The contractor or subcontractor must submit weekly, for each week in which any DBA- or Related Actscovered work is performed, certified payrolls to the contracting agency. The prime contractor is responsible for the submission of all certified payrolls by all subcontractors. A contracting agency or prime contractor may permit or require contractors to submit certified payrolls through an electronic system, as long as the electronic system requires a legally valid electronic signature; the system allows the contractor, the contracting agency, and the Department of Labor to access the certified payrolls upon request for at least 3 years after the work on the prime contract has been completed; and the contracting agency or prime contractor permits other methods of submission in situations where the contractor is unable or limited in its ability to use or access the electronic system.
(2) Information required. The certified payrolls submitted must set out accurately and completely all of the information required to be maintained under paragraph 3.a.(2) of this section, except that full Social Security numbers and last known addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses must not be included on weekly transmittals. Instead, the certified payrolls need only include an individually identifying number for each worker ( e.g., the last four digits of the worker's Social Security number). The required weekly certified payroll information may be submitted using Optional Form WH–347 or in any other format desired.

Optional Form WH–347 is available for this purpose from the Wage and Hour Division website at
https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/WHD/
legacy/files/wh347/.pdf or its successor website. It is not a violation of this section for a prime contractor to require a subcontractor to provide full Social Security numbers and last known addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses to the prime contractor for its own records, without weekly submission by the subcontractor to the contracting agency. (3) Statement of Compliance. Each certified payroll
submitted must be accompanied by a “Statement of
Compliance,” signed by the contractor or subcontractor, or the contractor's or subcontractor's agent who pays or supervises the payment of the persons working on the contract, and must certify the following:
(i) That the certified payroll for the payroll period contains the information required to be provided under paragraph 3.b. of this section, the appropriate information and basic records are being maintained under paragraph 3.a. of this section, and such information and records are correct and complete; (ii) That each laborer or mechanic (including each helper and apprentice) working on the contract during the payroll period has been paid the full weekly wages earned, without rebate, either directly or indirectly, and that no deductions have been made either directly or indirectly from the full wages earned, other than permissible deductions as set
forth in 29 CFR part 3; and
(iii) That each laborer or mechanic has been paid not less than the applicable wage rates and fringe benefits or cash equivalents for the classification(s) of work actually
performed, as specified in the applicable wage determination incorporated into the contract.
(4) Use of Optional Form WH–347. The weekly submission
of a properly executed certification set forth on the reverse side of Optional Form WH–347 will satisfy the requirement for submission of the “Statement of Compliance” required by paragraph 3.b.(3) of this section.

Agreement 1300-37
(5) Signature. The signature by the contractor,
subcontractor, or the contractor's or subcontractor's agent must be an original handwritten signature or a legally valid electronic signature.
(6) Falsification. The falsification of any of the above certifications may subject the contractor or subcontractor to civil or criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 31 U.S.C. 3729.
(7) Length of certified payroll retention. The contractor or subcontractor must preserve all certified payrolls during the course of the work and for a period of 3 years after all the work on the prime contract is completed.
c. Contracts, subcontracts, and related documents. The
contractor or subcontractor must maintain this contract or subcontract and related documents including, without
limitation, bids, proposals, amendments, modifications, and extensions. The contractor or subcontractor must preserve these contracts, subcontracts, and related documents during the course of the work and for a period of 3 years after all the work on the prime contract is completed.
d. Required disclosures and access (1) Required record
disclosures and access to workers. The contractor or
subcontractor must make the records required under
paragraphs 3.a. through 3.c. of this section, and any other documents that the contracting agency, the State DOT, the FHWA, or the Department of Labor deems necessary to
determine compliance with the labor standards provisions of any of the applicable statutes referenced by § 5.1, available for inspection, copying, or transcription by authorized
representatives of the contracting agency, the State DOT, the FHWA, or the Department of Labor, and must permit such
representatives to interview workers during working hours on the job.
(2) Sanctions for non-compliance with records and worker access requirements. If the contractor or subcontractor fails to submit the required records or to make them available, or refuses to permit worker interviews during working hours on the job, the Federal agency may, after written notice to the contractor, sponsor, applicant, owner, or other entity, as the case may be, that maintains such records or that employs such workers, take such action as may be necessary to cause the suspension of any further payment, advance, or guarantee of funds. Furthermore, failure to submit the required records upon request or to make such records available, or to permit worker interviews during working hours on the job, may be grounds for debarment action pursuant to § 5.12. In addition, any contractor or other person that fails to submit the required records or make those records available to WHD within the time WHD requests that the records be produced will be precluded from introducing as evidence in an administrative proceeding under 29 CFR part 6 any of the required records that were not provided or made available to WHD. WHD will take into consideration a
reasonable request from the contractor or person for an extension of the time for submission of records. WHD will determine the reasonableness of the request and may consider, among other things, the location of the records and the volume of production.
(3) Required information disclosures. Contractors and
subcontractors must maintain the full Social Security number and last known address, telephone number, and email address of each covered worker, and must provide them upon request to the contracting agency, the State DOT, the FHWA, the
contractor, or the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor for purposes of an investigation or other compliance action.

4. Apprentices and equal employment opportunity (29 CFR

5.5)
a. Apprentices (1) Rate of pay. Apprentices will be permitted to work at less than the predetermined rate for the work they perform when they are employed pursuant to and individually registered in a bona fide apprenticeship program registered with the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training
Administration, Office of Apprenticeship (OA), or with a State Apprenticeship Agency recognized by the OA. A person who is not individually registered in the program, but who has been certified by the OA or a State Apprenticeship Agency (where appropriate) to be eligible for probationary employment as an apprentice, will be permitted to work at less than the
predetermined rate for the work they perform in the first 90 days of probationary employment as an apprentice in such a
program. In the event the OA or a State Apprenticeship Agency recognized by the OA withdraws approval of an apprenticeship program, the contractor will no longer be permitted to use apprentices at less than the applicable predetermined rate for the work performed until an acceptable program is approved. (2) Fringe benefits. Apprentices must be paid fringe benefits in accordance with the provisions of the apprenticeship program. If the apprenticeship program does not specify fringe benefits, apprentices must be paid the full amount of fringe benefits listed on the wage determination for the applicable classification. If the Administrator determines that a different practice prevails for the applicable apprentice classification, fringe benefits must be paid in accordance with that
determination.
(3) Apprenticeship ratio. The allowable ratio of apprentices to journeyworkers on the job site in any craft classification must not be greater than the ratio permitted to the contractor as to the entire work force under the registered program or the ratio applicable to the locality of the project pursuant to paragraph

4.a.(4) of this section. Any worker listed on a payroll at an apprentice wage rate, who is not registered or otherwise employed as stated in paragraph 4.a.(1) of this section, must be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the classification of work actually performed.

In addition, any apprentice performing work on the job site in excess of the ratio permitted under this section must be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the work actually performed.
(4) Reciprocity of ratios and wage rates. Where a contractor is performing construction on a project in a locality other than the locality in which its program is registered, the ratios and wage rates (expressed in percentages of the journeyworker's hourly rate) applicable within the locality in which the construction is being performed must be observed. If there is no applicable ratio or wage rate for the locality of the project, the ratio and wage rate specified in the contractor's registered program must be observed.
b. Equal employment opportunity. The use of apprentices and journeyworkers under this part must be in conformity with Agreement 1300-38
the equal employment opportunity requirements of Executive Order 11246, as amended, and 29 CFR part 30.
c. Apprentices and Trainees (programs of the U.S. DOT).

Apprentices and trainees working under apprenticeship and skill training programs which have been certified by the Secretary of Transportation as promoting EEO in connection with Federal-aid highway construction programs are not subject to the
requirements of paragraph 4 of this Section IV. 23 CFR
230.111(e)(2). The straight time hourly wage rates for
apprentices and trainees under such programs will be
established by the particular programs. The ratio of apprentices and trainees to journeyworkers shall not be greater than permitted by the terms of the particular program.

5. Compliance with Copeland Act requirements. The
contractor shall comply with the requirements of 29 CFR part 3, which are incorporated by reference in this contract as provided in 29 CFR 5.5.

6. Subcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor must insert FHWA-1273 in any subcontracts, along with the applicable wage determination(s) and such other clauses or contract modifications as the contracting agency may by appropriate instructions require, and a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses and wage determination(s) in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor is responsible for the compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with all the contract clauses in this section. In the event of any violations of these clauses, the prime contractor and any subcontractor(s) responsible will be liable for any unpaid wages and monetary relief, including interest from the date of the underpayment or loss, due to any workers of lower-tier
subcontractors, and may be subject to debarment, as
appropriate. 29 CFR 5.5.

7. Contract termination: debarment. A breach of the contract clauses in 29 CFR 5.5 may be grounds for termination of the contract, and for debarment as a contractor and a subcontractor as provided in 29 CFR 5.12.

8. Compliance with Davis-Bacon and Related Act
requirements. All rulings and interpretations of the DavisBacon and Related Acts contained in 29 CFR parts 1, 3, and 5 are herein incorporated by reference in this contract as provided in 29 CFR 5.5.

9. Disputes concerning labor standards. As provided in 29 CFR

5.5, disputes arising out of the labor standards provisions of this contract shall not be subject to the general disputes clause of this contract. Such disputes shall be resolved in accordance with the procedures of the Department of Labor set forth in 29 CFR parts 5, 6, and 7. Disputes within the meaning of this clause include disputes between the contractor (or any of its
subcontractors) and the contracting agency, the
U.S. Department of Labor, or the employees or their
representatives.

10. Certification of eligibility. a. By entering into this contract, the contractor certifies that neither it nor any person or firm who has an interest in the contractor's firm is a person or firm ineligible to be awarded Government contracts by virtue of 40 U.S.C. 3144(b) or § 5.12(a).
b. No part of this contract shall be subcontracted to any person or firm ineligible for award of a Government contract by virtue of 40 U.S.C. 3144(b) or § 5.12(a).
c. The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in the U.S. Code, Title 18 Crimes and Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C. 1001.

11. Anti-retaliation. It is unlawful for any person to discharge, demote, intimidate, threaten, restrain, coerce, blacklist, harass, or in any other manner discriminate against, or to cause any person to discharge, demote, intimidate, threaten, restrain, coerce, blacklist, harass, or in any other manner discriminate against, any worker or job applicant for:
a. Notifying any contractor of any conduct which the worker reasonably believes constitutes a violation of the DBA, Related Acts, this part, or 29 CFR part 1 or 3;
b. Filing any complaint, initiating or causing to be initiated any proceeding, or otherwise asserting or seeking to assert on behalf of themselves or others any right or protection under the DBA, Related Acts, this part, or 29 CFR part 1 or3;
c. Cooperating in any investigation or other compliance action, or testifying in any proceeding under the DBA, Related Acts, this part, or 29 CFR part 1 or 3; or
d. Informing any other person about their rights under the DBA, Related Acts, this part, or 29 CFR part 1 or3.

V. CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS
ACT
Pursuant to 29 CFR 5.5(b), the following clauses apply to any Federal-aid construction contract in an amount in excess of $100,000 and subject to the overtime provisions of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act. These clauses shall be inserted in addition to the clauses required by 29 CFR 5.5(a) or 29 CFR 4.6. As used in this paragraph, the terms laborers and mechanics include watchpersons and guards.

1. Overtime requirements. No contractor or subcontractor contracting for any part of the contract work which may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall require or permit any such laborer or mechanic in any
workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to work in excess of forty hours in such workweek unless such laborer or mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek. 29 CFR 5.5.

2. Violation; liability for unpaid wages; liquidated damages. In the event of any violation of the clause set forth in paragraph 1. of this section the contractor and any subcontractor responsible therefor shall be liable for the unpaid wages and interest from the date of the underpayment. In addition, such contractor and subcontractor shall be liable to the United States (in the case of work done under contract for the District of Columbia or a territory, to such District or to such territory), for liquidated damages. Such liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or
Agreement 1300-39
mechanic, including watchpersons and guards, employed in violation of the clause set forth in paragraph 1. of this section, in the sum currently provided in 29 CFR 5.5(b)(2)* for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set forth in paragraph 1. of this section.
* $31 as of January 15, 2023 (See 88 FR 88 FR 2210) as may be adjusted annually by the Department of Labor, pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990.

3. Withholding for unpaid wages and liquidateddamages
a. Withholding process. The FHWA or the contracting agency may, upon its own action, or must, upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor, withhold or cause to be withheld from the contractor so much of the accrued payments or advances as may be considered
necessary to satisfy the liabilities of the prime contractor or any subcontractor for any unpaid wages; monetary relief, including interest; and liquidated damages required by the clauses set forth in this section on this contract, any other Federal contract with the same prime contractor, or any other federally assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety
Standards Act that is held by the same prime contractor (as defined in § 5.2). The necessary funds may be withheld from the contractor under this contract, any other Federal contract with the same prime contractor, or any other federally assisted contract that is subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act and is held by the same prime contractor, regardless of whether the other contract was awarded or assisted by the same agency, and such funds may be used to satisfy the contractor liability for which the funds were withheld. b. Priority to withheld funds. The Department has priority to funds withheld or to be withheld in accordance with SectionIV paragraph 2.a. or paragraph 3.a. of this section, or both, over claims to those funds by:
(1) A contractor's surety(ies), including without limitation performance bond sureties and payment bond sureties;
(2) A contracting agency for its reprocurement costs;
(3) A trustee(s) (either a court-appointed trustee or a U.S. trustee, or both) in bankruptcy of a contractor, or a contractor's bankruptcy estate;
(4) A contractor's assignee(s);
(5) A contractor's successor(s); or
(6) A claim asserted under the Prompt Payment Act, 31
U.S.C. 3901–3907.

4. Subcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor mustinsert in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in paragraphs 1. through 5. of this section and a clause requiring the
subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor is responsible for
compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with the clauses set forth in paragraphs 1. through 5. In the event of any violations of these clauses, the prime contractor and any subcontractor(s) responsible will be liable for any unpaid wages and monetary relief, including interest from the date of the underpayment or loss, due to any workers of lower- tier subcontractors, and associated liquidated damages and may be subject to debarment, as appropriate.

5. Anti-retaliation. It is unlawful for any person to discharge, demote, intimidate, threaten, restrain, coerce, blacklist, harass, or in any other manner discriminate against, or to cause any person to discharge, demote, intimidate, threaten, restrain, coerce, blacklist, harass, or in any other manner discriminate against, any worker or job applicant for:
a. Notifying any contractor of any conduct which the worker reasonably believes constitutes a violation of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (CWHSSA) or its
implementing regulations in this part;
b. Filing any complaint, initiating or causing to be initiated any proceeding, or otherwise asserting or seeking to assert on behalf of themselves or others any right or protection under CWHSSA or this part;
c. Cooperating in any investigation or other compliance action, or testifying in any proceeding under CWHSSA or this part; or
d. Informing any other person about their rights under
CWHSSA or this part.

VI. SUBLETTING OR ASSIGNING THE CONTRACT
This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts on the National Highway System pursuant to 23 CFR 635.116.

1. The contractor shall perform with its own organization contract work amounting to not less than 30 percent (or a greater percentage if specified elsewhere in the contract) of the total original contract price, excluding any specialty items
designated by the contracting agency. Specialty items may be performed by subcontract and the amount of any such specialty items performed may be deducted from the total original contract price before computing the amount of work required to be performed by the contractor's own organization (23 CFR 635.116).
a. The term “perform work with its own organization” in paragraph 1 of Section VI refers to workers employed or leased by the prime contractor, and equipment owned or
rented by the prime contractor, with or without operators. Such term does not include employees or equipment of a
subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor, agents of the prime contractor, or any other assignees. The term may include payments for the costs of hiring leased employees from an employee leasing firm meeting all relevant Federal and State regulatory requirements. Leased employees may only be
included in this term if the prime contractor meets all of the following conditions: (based on longstanding interpretation) (1) the prime contractor maintains control over the
supervision of the day-to-day activities of the leased
employees;
(2) the prime contractor remains responsible for the quality of the work of the leased employees;
Agreement 1300-40
(3) the prime contractor retains all power to accept or exclude individual employees from work on the project; and (4) the prime contractor remains ultimately responsible for the payment of predetermined minimum wages, the
submission of payrolls, statements of compliance and all other Federal regulatoryrequirements.
b. "Specialty Items" shall be construed to be limited towork that requires highly specialized knowledge, abilities, or equipment not ordinarily available in the type of contracting organizations qualified and expected to bid or propose on the contract as a whole and in general are to be limited to minor components of the overall contract. 23 CFR 635.102.

2. Pursuant to 23 CFR 635.116(a), the contract amount upon which the requirements set forth in paragraph (1) of Section VI is computed includes the cost of material and manufactured products which are to be purchased or produced by the
contractor under the contractprovisions.

3. Pursuant to 23 CFR 635.116(c), the contractor shall furnish (a) a competent superintendent or supervisor who is employed by the firm, has full authority to direct performance of the work in accordance with the contract requirements, and is in charge of all construction operations (regardless of who performs the work) and (b) such other of its own organizational resources
(supervision, management, and engineering services) as the contracting officer determines is necessary to assure the performance of the contract.

4. No portion of the contract shall be sublet, assigned or otherwise disposed of except with the written consent of the contracting officer, or authorized representative, and such consent when given shall not be construed to relieve the contractor of any responsibility for the fulfillment of the contract. Written consent will be given only after the contracting agency has assured that each subcontract is evidenced in writing and that it contains all pertinent provisions and requirements of the prime contract. (based on long- standing interpretation of 23 CFR635.116).

5. The 30-percent self-performance requirement of paragraph (1) is not applicable to design-build contracts; however, contracting agencies may establish their own self-performance requirements. 23 CFR635.116(d).

VII. SAFETY: ACCIDENT PREVENTION
This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related subcontracts.

1. In the performance of this contract the contractor shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws governing safety, health, and sanitation (23 CFR Part 635). The contractor shall provide all safeguards, safety devices and protective equipment and take any other needed actions as it determines, or as the contracting officer may determine, to be reasonably necessary to protect the life and health of employees on the job and the safety of the public and to protect property in connection with the performance of the work covered by the contract. 23 CFR 635.108.

2. It is a condition of this contract, and shall be made a condition of each subcontract, which the contractor enters into pursuant to this contract, that the contractor and any subcontractor shall not permit any employee, in performance of the contract, to work in surroundings or under conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous to his/her health or safety, as
determined under construction safety and
health standards (29 CFR Part 1926) promulgated by the
Secretary of Labor, in accordance with Section 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3704). 29 CFR 1926.10.

3. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1926.3, it is a condition of this contract that the Secretary of Labor or authorized representative thereof, shall have right of entry to any site of contract performance to inspect or investigate the matter of compliance with the construction safety and health standards and to carry out the duties of the Secretary under Section 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3704).

VIII. FALSE STATEMENTS CONCERNING HIGHWAY

PROJECTS
This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related subcontracts.

In order to assure high quality and durable construction in conformity with approved plans and specifications and a high degree of reliability on statements and representations made by engineers, contractors, suppliers, and workers on Federal- aid highway projects, it is essential that all persons concerned with the project perform their functions as carefully, thoroughly, and honestly as possible. Willful falsification, distortion, or misrepresentation with respect to any facts related to the project is a violation of Federal law. To prevent any misunderstanding regarding the seriousness of these and similar acts, Form FHWA1022 shall be posted on each Federal-aid highway project (23 CFR Part 635) in one or more places where it is readily available to all persons concerned with the project:
18 U.S.C. 1020 reads as follows:
"Whoever, being an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, or of any State or Territory, or whoever, whether a person, association, firm, or corporation, knowingly makes any false statement, false representation, or false report as to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of the material used or to be used, or the quantity or quality of the work performed or to be performed, or the cost thereof in connection with the submission of plans, maps, specifications, contracts, or costs of construction on any highway or related project submitted for approval to the Secretary of Transportation; or
Whoever knowingly makes any false statement, false
representation, false report or false claim with respect to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of any work performed or to be performed, or materials furnished or to be furnished, in connection with the construction of any highway or related project approved by the Secretary of Transportation; or
Whoever knowingly makes any false statement or false
representation as to material fact in any statement, certificate, or report submitted pursuant to provisions of the Federal-aid Roads Act approved July 11, 1916, (39 Stat. 355), as amended and supplemented;
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both."
Agreement 1300-41
IX. IMPLEMENTATION OF CLEAN AIR ACT AND FEDERAL
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT (42 U.S.C. 7606; 2 CFR
200.88; EO 11738)
This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts in excess of $150,000 and to all related
subcontracts. 48 CFR 2.101; 2 CFR 200.327.

By submission of this bid/proposal or the execution of this contract or subcontract, as appropriate, the bidder, proposer, Federal-aid construction contractor, subcontractor, supplier, or vendor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401- 7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387). Violations must be reported to the Federal Highway Administration and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency. 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II.

The contractor agrees to include or cause to be included the requirements of this Section in every subcontract, and further agrees to take such action as the contracting agency may direct as a means of enforcing such requirements. 2 CFR 200.327.

X. CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT,

SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY

EXCLUSION
This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts, design-build contracts, subcontracts, lower-tier subcontracts, purchase orders, lease agreements, consultant contracts or any other covered transaction requiring FHWA approval or that is estimated to cost $25,000 or more – as defined in 2 CFR Parts 180 and 1200. 2 CFR 180.220 and
1200.220.

1. Instructions for Certification – First Tier Participants:
a. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective first tier participant is providing the certification set out below. b. The inability of a person to provide the certification set out below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective first tier participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective first tier participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such a person from participation in this transaction. 2 CFR 180.320.
c. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the contracting agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the contracting agency may terminate this transaction for cause of default. 2 CFR 180.325.
d. The prospective first tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the contracting agency to whom this proposal is submitted if any time the prospective first tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed
circumstances. 2 CFR 180.345 and 180.350.
e. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred," "suspended," "ineligible," "participant," "person," "principal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR Parts 180, Subpart I, 180.900-180.1020, and 1200. “First Tier Covered Transactions” refers to any covered transaction between a recipient or subrecipient of Federal funds and a participant (such as the prime or general contract). “Lower Tier Covered Transactions” refers to any covered transaction under a First Tier Covered Transaction (such as subcontracts). “First Tier Participant” refers to the participant who has entered into a covered transaction with a recipient or subrecipient of Federal funds (such as the prime or general contractor). “Lower Tier Participant” refers any participant who has entered into a covered transaction with a First Tier Participant or other Lower Tier Participants (such as subcontractors and suppliers). f. The prospective first tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction. 2 CFR 180.330. g. The prospective first tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transactions," provided by the department or contracting agency, entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions exceeding the $25,000 threshold. 2 CFR 180.220 and 180.300.
h. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. 2 CFR 180.300; 180.320, and 180.325. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. 2 CFR 180.335.

To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any lower tier prospective participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management website (https://www.sam.gov/). 2 CFR 180.300, 180.320, and 180.325.
i. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require the establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause.

The knowledge and information of the prospective participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. j. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph (f) of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default. 2 CFR 180.325.
* * * * *
Agreement 1300-42

2. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion – First Tier
Participants:
a. The prospective first tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
(1) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal
department or agency, 2 CFR 180.335;.
(2) Have not within a three-year period preceding this
proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property, 2 CFR 180.800; (3) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(2) of this certification, 2 CFR 180.700 and 180.800; and
(4) Have not within a three-year period preceding this
application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. 2 CFR 180.335(d).
(5) Are not a corporation that has been convicted of a felony violation under any Federal law within the two-year period preceding this proposal (USDOT Order 4200.6 implementing appropriations act requirements); and
(6) Are not a corporation with any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted, or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability (USDOT Order 4200.6 implementing appropriations act requirements). b. Where the prospective participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant should attach an explanation to this proposal. 2 CFR 180.335 and 180.340.
* * * * *

3. Instructions for Certification - Lower Tier Participants:
(Applicable to all subcontracts, purchase orders, and other lower tier transactions requiring prior FHWA approval or estimated to cost $25,000 or more - 2 CFR Parts 180 and 1200). 2 CFR 180.220 and 1200.220.
a. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below. b. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous
certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department, or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment.
c. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 2 CFR 180.365.
d. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred,"
"suspended," "ineligible," "participant," "person," "principal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR Parts 180, Subpart I, 180.900 – 180.1020, and 1200.

You may contact the person to which this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. “First Tier Covered Transactions” refers to any covered transaction between a recipient or subrecipient of Federal funds and a participant (such as the prime or general contract). “Lower Tier Covered Transactions” refers to any covered transaction under a First Tier Covered Transaction (such as subcontracts). “First Tier Participant” refers to the participant who has entered into a covered transaction with a recipient or subrecipient of Federal funds (such as the prime or general contractor). “Lower Tier Participant” refers any participant who has entered into a covered transaction with a First Tier Participant or other Lower Tier Participants (such as subcontractors and suppliers). e. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by
submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction
originated. 2 CFR 1200.220 and 1200.332.
f. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include this clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transaction," without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions exceeding the $25,000 threshold. 2 CFR 180.220 and 1200.220.
g. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any lower tier prospective participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management website (https://www.sam.gov/), which is compiled by the General Services Administration. 2 CFR
180.300, 180.320, 180.330, and 180.335.
h. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.
i. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph e of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily Agreement 1300-43
excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. 2 CFR 180.325.
* * * * *

4. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion--Lower Tier
Participants:
a. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals:
(1) is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for
debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal
department or agency, 2 CFR 180.355;
(2) is a corporation that has been convicted of a felony violation under any Federal law within the two-year period preceding this proposal (USDOT Order 4200.6 implementing appropriations act requirements);and
(3) is a corporation with any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted, or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability. (USDOT Order 4200.6 implementing appropriations act
requirements)
b. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant should attach an explanation to this proposal.
* * * * *
XI. CERTIFICATION REGARDING USE OF CONTRACT

FUNDS FOR LOBBYING
This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related subcontracts which exceed
$100,000. 49 CFR Part 20, App. A.

1. The prospective participant certifies, by signingand submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
a. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
b. If any funds other than Federal appropriated fundshave been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report
Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.

2. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Any person who fails to file the required
certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

3. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting its bid or proposal that the participant shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such
recipients shall certify and discloseaccordingly.

XII. USE OF UNITED STATES-FLAG VESSELS:

This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts, design-build contracts, subcontracts, lower-tier subcontracts, purchase orders, lease agreements, or any other covered transaction. 46 CFR Part 381.

This requirement applies to material or equipment that is acquired for a specific Federal-aid highway project. 46 CFR 381.7. It is not applicable to goods or materials that come into inventories independent of an FHWA funded-contract.

When oceanic shipments (or shipments across the Great Lakes) are necessary for materials or equipment acquired for a specific Federal-aid construction project, the bidder, proposer, contractor, subcontractor, or vendor agrees:

1. To utilize privately owned United States-flag commercial vessels to ship at least 50 percent of the gross tonnage (computed separately for dry bulk carriers, dry cargo liners, and tankers) involved, whenever shipping any equipment, material, or commodities pursuant to this contract, to the extent such vessels are available at fair and reasonable rates for United States-flag commercial vessels. 46 CFR 381.7.

2. To furnish within 20 days following the date of loading for shipments originating within the United States or within 30 working days following the date of loading for shipments originating outside the United States, a legible copy of a rated, ‘on-board’ commercial ocean bill-of-lading in English for each shipment of cargo described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section to both the Contracting Officer (through the prime contractor in the case of subcontractor bills-of-lading) and to the Office of Cargo and Commercial Sealift (MAR-620), Maritime
Administration, Washington, DC 20590. (MARAD requires
copies of the ocean carrier's (master) bills of lading, certified onboard, dated, with rates and charges. These bills of lading may contain business sensitive information and therefore may be submitted directly to MARAD by the Ocean Transportation Intermediary on behalf of the contractor). 46 CFR 381.7.

Agreement 1300-44

ATTACHMENT A - EMPLOYMENT AND MATERIALS

PREFERENCE FOR APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT

HIGHWAY SYSTEM OR APPALACHIAN LOCAL ACCESS
ROAD CONTRACTS (23 CFR 633, Subpart B, Appendix B) This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid projects funded under the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965.

1. During the performance of this contract, the contractor undertaking to do work which is, or reasonably may be, done as on-site work, shall give preference to qualified persons who regularly reside in the labor area as designated by the DOL wherein the contract work is situated, or the subregion, or the Appalachian counties of the State wherein the contract work is situated, except:
a. To the extent that qualified persons regularly residing in the area are not available.
b. For the reasonable needs of the contractor to employ supervisory or specially experienced personnel necessary to assure an efficient execution of the contract work.
c. For the obligation of the contractor to offer employment to present or former employees as the result of a lawful collective bargaining contract, provided that the number of nonresident persons employed under this subparagraph (1c) shall not exceed 20 percent of the total number of employees employed by the contractor on the contract work, except as provided in
subparagraph (4) below.

2. The contractor shall place a job order with the State Employment Service indicating (a) the classifications of the laborers, mechanics and other employees required to perform the contract work, (b) the number of employees required in each classification, (c) the date on which the participant estimates such employees will be required, and (d) any other pertinent information required by the State Employment Service to complete the job order form. The job order may be placed with the State Employment Service in writing or by telephone. If during the course of the contract work, the information submitted by the contractor in the original job order is substantially modified, the participant shall promptly notify the State Employment Service.

3. The contractor shall give full consideration to all qualified job applicants referred to him by the State Employment Service. The contractor is not required to grant employment to any job applicants who, in his opinion, are not qualified to perform the classification of workrequired.

4. If, within one week following the placing of a job order by the contractor with the State Employment Service, the State Employment Service is unable to refer any qualified job applicants to the contractor, or less than the number requested, the State Employment Service will forward a certificate to the contractor indicating the unavailability of applicants. Such certificate shall be made a part of the contractor's permanent project records. Upon receipt of this certificate, the contractor may employ persons who do not normally reside in the labor area to fill positions covered by the certificate, notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraph (1c) above.

5. The provisions of 23 CFR 633.207(e) allow the contracting agency to provide a contractual preference for the use of mineral resource materials native to the Appalachian region.

6. The contractor shall include the provisions of Sections 1 through 4 of this Attachment A in every subcontract forwork which is, or reasonably may be, done as on-site work.

Faithful Performance Bond 1310-1
SECTION 1310

FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

THAT the City of Cathedral City, a municipal corporation, hereinafter designated the City, has, on ____ , awarded to , hereinafter designated as the Principal, a Contract for Bid No. B24-60E, CIP NO. 8751, FEDERAL AID Project NO. HSIPL-5430(035), VARNER ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, and WHEREAS, said Principal is required under the terms of said Contract to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said Contract:

NOW, THEREFORE, we, the Principal, and _____________________________________, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City in the just and full amount of ( ) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, and successors, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if said Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and faithfully perform the covenants, conditions, and agreements in the said contract and any alterations made as therein provided, on his or their part to be kept and performed, at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless, the City, its officers and agents as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and virtue.

It is acknowledged that the Contract provides for one-year guarantee period, during which time this bond remains in full force and effort.

And the said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall, in any way, affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the work or to the specifications. Said Surety hereby waives the provisions of Sections 2819 and 2845 of the Civil Code of the State of California.

THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Faithful Performance Bond 1310-2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and Surety have executed this instrument under their seals this _________ day of _________________________________, 20__ , the name and corporate seal of each corporate party being hereto affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative, pursuant to authority of its governing body.
__________________________________________________
Principal
(Seal)
__________________________________________________
Signature for Principal
__________________________________________________
Title of Signatory
__________________________________________________
Surety
(Seal)
__________________________________________________
Signature for Surety
__________________________________________________
Title of Signatory
__________________________________________________
Address of Surety
__________________________________________________
Phone # of Surety
__________________________________________________
Contact Person For Surety
Payment Bond 1320-1
SECTION 1320

PAYMENT BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

THAT the City of Cathedral City, a municipal corporation, hereinafter designated the City, has, on , awarded to , hereinafter designated as the Principal, a Contract for Bid No. B24-60E, CIP NO. 8751, FEDERAL AID Project NO. HSIPL-5430(035), VARNER ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, and WHEREAS, said Principal is required to furnish a bond in connection and with said Contract, providing that if said Principal, or any of it or its subcontractors shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, or other supplies used in, upon, for, or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor done thereon of any kind, the Surety of this bond will pay the same to the extent hereinafter set forth:

NOW, THEREFORE, we, the Principal, and____________________________________, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City in the just and full amount of ( ), executors, administrators, and successors, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if said Principal, it or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, or other supplies used in, upon, for, or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind or for amount due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, or for any amounts due, or to be withheld pursuant to Sections 18806 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California with respect to such work or labor, then said surety will pay the same in or to an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also will pay in case suit is brought upon this bond, such reasonable attorney's fees to the City as shall be fixed by the court.

This bond shall insure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations named in Section 3181 of the Civil Code of the State of California so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.

And the said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition of the terms of the Contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall, in any way, affect its obligations of this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the contract or to the work or to the specifications.

Said Surety hereby waives the provisions of Sections 2819 and 2845 of the Civil Code of the State of California.

THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Payment Bond 1320-2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and Surety have executed this instrument under their seals this _________ day of _________________________________, 20_____, the name and corporate seal of each corporate party being hereto affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative, pursuant to authority of its governing body.
__________________________________________________
Principal
(Seal)
__________________________________________________
Signature for Principal
________________________________________________
Title of Signatory
__________________________________________________
Surety
(Seal)
__________________________________________________
Signature for Surety
__________________________________________________
Title of Signatory
__________________________________________________
Address of Surety
__________________________________________________
Phone # of Surety
__________________________________________________
Contact Person For Surety
Workers' Compensation Insurance 1330-1
SECTION 1330

WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATE
In accordance with California Labor Code Section 1861, prior to commencement of work on the Contract, the Contractor shall sign and file with the City the following certification:
"I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract."
______________________________________________
Signature
______________________________________________
Title
______________________________________________
Date
Liability & Insurance Requirements 1340-1
SECTION 1340

LIABILITY AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

1.0 INDEMNIFICATION
Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, City Council and each member thereof, and every officer, employee and agent of City, from any claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense (including, without limitation, attorney’s fees and costs) arising from any intentional, reckless, negligent, or otherwise wrongful acts, errors or omissions of the Contractor, or any of the Contractor'’ employees, or any of its subcontractors arising out of work under this Contract.

The City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may have against Contractor, any of the Contractor’s employees, or any of its subcontractors under this Section because of the acceptance by the City, or the deposit with the City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Contract. The hold harmless, indemnification and duty to defend provisions of this Section shall apply regardless of whether or not said insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense described herein. The City will not be liable for any accident, loss, or damage to the work prior to its completion and acceptance.

2.0 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

2.1 General
After award of Contract, the Contractor shall promptly obtain, at its own expense, all the insurance required by Paragraph 1340-2.0, INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, and shall submit coverage verification for review and approval by the City upon execution of the Contract.

The Notice to Proceed with the Work under this Contract will not be issued, and the Contractor shall not commence work, until such insurance has been approved by the City. The Contractor shall not allow any subcontractors to commence work on its subcontract until all similar insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained and verified by Contractor. Such insurance shall remain in full force and effect at all times during the prosecution of the Work and until the final completion and acceptance thereof.

The Notice to Proceed does not relieve the Contractor of the duty to obtain such insurance as required by Paragraph 1340-2.0 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.

2.2 Commercial General Liability Policy
The Contractor shall take out and maintain during the life of the Contract, a Commercial General Liability Policy, on an occurrence basis, with a minimum limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage for any one occurrence and a Two Million Dollar ($2,000,000) annual project aggregate, for all of the following:
a. Premises Operations, including Explosion, Collapse and Underground (X, C, and U) Coverage. b. Completed Operations/Products, including X, C, and U Coverage. c. Independent Contractors.
d. Blanket Contractual.
e. Deductible shall not exceed One Thousand Dollars ($1,000).

Liability & Insurance Requirements 1340-2

2.3 Commercial Business Auto Policy
The Contractor shall take out and maintain during the life of this Contract a Commercial Business Auto Policy, on an occurrence basis, with a minimum amount of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage, providing at least all of the following coverage:
a. Coverage shall be applicable to any and all leased, owned, hired, or non-owned vehicles used in pursuit of any of the activities associated with this Contract. b. Any and all mobile equipment, including cranes, which is not covered under said Commercial Business Auto Policy shall have said coverage provided for under the Commercial General Liability Policy.
c. Deductible shall not exceed One Thousand Dollars ($1,000).

2.4 Workers' Compensation Insurance
The Contractor shall take out and maintain during the life of the Contract, Worker's Compensation and Employers' Liability insurance providing coverage for any and all employees of Contractor:
a. The required policy shall provide coverage for Workers' Compensation (Coverage A). b. This policy shall provide coverage for One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) Employers' Liability (Coverage B).

2.5 Endorsements
All of the following endorsements are required to be made a part of the policies described in this Section hereof:
a. "The City, City employees and officers, the City Engineer, its consultants, elected officials, agents, and sub-consultants are hereby added as additional insured insofar as Work done under this Contract is concerned."
b. "This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects any other valid and collectible insurance, including self-insured retention, the City may possess, and any other insurance the City does possess shall be considered excess insurance only." c. "This insurance shall act for each insured, and additional insured, as though a separate policy had been written for each. This, however, will not act to increase the limit of liability of the insuring company.
d. "Thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation shall be given to the City. Such notice shall be sent to:

Kevin Biersack, Financial Services Director
City of Cathedral City
68-700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero
Cathedral City, CA 92234

2.6 Change in Terms
The Contractor shall provide immediate written notice to the City of any change in terms and conditions and/or reduction in the coverage of any nature to the insurance policies. The notice shall be sent to the location identified in Paragraph 1340-2.6.d, Endorsements. The Contractor shall be obligated to pay any extra premium for maintaining the insurance requirements specified herein.

← All documents from this meeting