Cathedral City City Council
June 25, 2025

October 2017
January 2018
February 2018
April

CITY OF RIALTO

STREETLIGHT BENEFIT ANALYSIS
May 2018
2020

MOUNTAIN VIEW WAREHOUSE PROJECT

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
City of Cathedral City
Engineering & Traffic Survey
May 2025

CERTIFICATION

I, Nicholas Lowe, do hereby certify that this Engin eering and Traffic Survey for the City of Cathedral City was performed under my supervisio n. I certify that I am experienced in performing surveys of this type and duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Civil and Traffic Engineer.

Nicholas Lowe
RCE# 87666
TE# 3065
5/18/2025

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 - Introduction .............................................................................................. 1-1  Regulations and Guidelines __________________________________________________ _ 1-1  Requirements and Methodology of an Engineering and Traffic Survey ______________ 1-5 SECTION 2 - Speed Survey Evaluation .................................................. ..................... 2-1  Field Review __________________________________________________ ______________ 2-3  Statistical Analysis Factors ____________________________________________________ 2-3  2014 CA MUTCD Standard __________________________________________________ _ 2-4  Collision History __________________________________________________ ___________ 2-5 SECTION 3 - Results and Recommendations .................................................. .......... 3-1  Avenida Maravilla ____________________________________________________________ 3-5  Cathedral Canyon Drive __________________________________________________ ____ 3-7  Date Palm Drive __________________________________________________ __________ 3-11  Da Vall Drive _______________________________________________________________ 3-16  Dave Kelly Road ____________________________________________________________ 3-18  Dinah Shore Drive __________________________________________________ ________ 3-19  East Palm Canyon Drive _____________________________________________________ 3-21  Edom Hill Road _____________________________________________________________ 3-23  Gerald Ford Drive ___________________________________________________________ 3-24  Landau Boulevard __________________________________________________ ________ 3-26  McCallum Way __________________________________________________ ___________ 3-29  Mountain View Road __________________________________________________ ______ 3-31  Palm Drive _________________________________________________________________ 3-32  Perez Road __________________________________________________ ______________ 3-33  Plumley Road __________________________________________________ ____________ 3-35  Ramon Road _______________________________________________________________ 3-37  San Antonio Drive __________________________________________________ ________ 3-40  Santoro Drive __________________________________________________ ____________ 3-41  San Luis Rey Drive __________________________________________________ _______ 3-42  Tachevah Drive _____________________________________________________________ 3-43  Varner Road __________________________________________________ _____________ 3-45

ii

 Vista Chino Drive __________________________________________________ _________ 3-47  30 th Avenue __________________________________________________ ______________ 3-49  33 rd Avenue ________________________________________________________________ 3-51  35 th Avenue __________________________________________________ ______________ 3-52

LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1 – Survey Locations and Limits ............................................................................................ 2-1 Table 2-2 – 2022 California State Highways Collision Rate ............................................................. 2-5 Table 2-3 - Collision Rate from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2024 ....................................... 2-5 Table 2-4 - Road Segment Collision Rates from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2024 ......... 2-6 Table 3-1 - Speed Survey Recommendations .................................................................................... 3-1

1-1

SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION
This Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) is inten ded to serve as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for s elected streets within Cathedral City. This survey was authorized by the city and independently conducted by the private consulting firm Albert A. Webb Associates (WEBB).

Engineering and traffic surveys for speed limits sh ould be conducted every seven (7), or fourteen (14) years for the purpose of complying wi th California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 40802.
 Regulations and Guidelines
AB 43 defines Assembly Bill 43. This bill would extend the period that a speed limit justified by a traffic and engineering survey conducted more the 7 years ago remains valid, for purposes of speed enforcement, if evaluated by a registered engineer, as specified, to 14 years.

This bill would also exempt a senior zone and busin ess activity district, as defined, from those provisions.

This bill makes several changes to existing speed limit laws, including:

1) Vulnerable Pedestrians : Local authorities are authorized to consider the safety of vulnerable groups when adjusting speed li mits based on engineering and traffic surveys and allows an addit ional 5 mph reduction of the posted speed limits.

2) Speed Limits in Business/Residential Districts : The bill establishes a 25 mph speed limit on state highways within business o r residential districts and allows Caltrans to change speed limits in these areas.

3) Lower Speed Limits : It permits Caltrans and local authorities to set speed limits as low as 15 or 20 mph on state highways.

4) School and Business Activity Districts: Local au thorities can lower speed limits near business activity districts and s chools without an engineering survey, with a warning period for viola tions during the first 30 days of implementation.

5) Traffic Surveys and Enforcement : The bill allows for further speed limit reductions and requires updates to the California M anual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. It also establishes a time line for implementing these changes related to a new online traffic adjudication tool.

6) Speed Trap and Speed Limit Validity : The bill extends the validity of speed limits justified by engineering surveys from 7 to 14 years, and exempts senior zones and business activity district s from certain speed trap rules

These changes aim to improve safety and allow more flexibility in setting speed limits, particularly around vulnerable populations and specific districts.

1-2

SECTION 1. Section 627 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
627. (a) “Engineering and traffic survey,” as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods deter mined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.

SEC. 7. Section 22358.7 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
22358.7. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more th an is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:

(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more tha n one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors.
(2) The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pede strians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as chi ldren, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
(b) (1) As used in this section, “safety corridor” shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revisi on of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device s. In making this determination, the department shall consider h ighways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not li mited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System.
(2) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control De vices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). In making this determination, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway.
(c) A local authority may not lower a speed limit a s authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judi cial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infractio n violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing wit h Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner.
(d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour o r less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

CVC Division 11, Chapter 7 defines the California S peed Laws. CVC Section 22352 indicates that prima facie speed limits are 15 miles per hour (mph) at unprotected railroad grade crossings, uncontrolled highway intersections with sight restrictions, and on any alley. In addition, the prima facie speed limit is 25 mph in residence and business districts, when approaching or passing a school building or grounds thereof, or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens. C VC Division 1 defines a business district and residence district in Sections 235 and 515, respectively.

1-3

A “business district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highw ay, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous prop erty fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b ) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so o ccupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists. 1

A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sid es of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a m ile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separat e dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists. 2

Section 2235 7(a) permits the establishment of speed limits greater than 25 mph based on the following text:

Whenever a local authority determines upon the basi s of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 mil es per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffi c and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a st ate highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 mile s per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 miles per ho ur or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. 3 Therefore, the CVC allows local authorities to incr ease the prima facie limits by ordinance or resolution to appropriate limits as determined by a n engineering and traffic survey. Posted speed limits not defined in the CVC or established by ordinance are not valid. The CVC requires that speed surveys must be performed with the use o f radar or other electronic devices at locations where speed limits are to be enforced wit h the use of radar. The current survey must be completed within five years as specified in Sect ion 40802(a), seven years as specified in Section 40802(c), or ten years as specified in Sect ion 40802(c), of the date of the preceding survey. A survey allowed to expire passed the valid duration of the previous survey would constitute a speed trap as defined in Sections 40802 of the CVC:
(1) (a) A “speed trap” is either of the following:

1 California Department of Motor Vehicles, California Vehicle Code , Division 1, Section 235, 2025 2 California Department of Motor Vehicles, California Vehicle Code , Division 1, Section 515, 2025 3 California Department of Motor Vehicles, California Vehicle Code , Division 11, Chapter 7, Section 22357, 2025

1-4

(1) A particular section of a highway measured as t o distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise de termined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.

(2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of th e alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit invol ves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, business activity d istrict, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.

(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:

(A) A particular section of a highway measured as t o distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise de termined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.

(B) (i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 2 2352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 2 2358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the followin g time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enf orcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:

(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years.

(II) If an engineering and traffic survey was condu cted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violat ion, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the hi ghway and determines that no significant changes in roadway o r traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limite d to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or t raffic volume, 14 years.

(ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local st reet, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.

1-5

 Requirements and Methodology of an Engineering and Traffic Survey
Speed zones are primarily established to protect th e public from the unreasonable behavior of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dangerous driver s. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed. The 85th-percentile speed is defined as the speed at or below which 85 percent of traffic is moving. Speed limits established on this basis c onform to the greater majority of motorists as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are no t dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals.

The Engineering and Traffic Survey, as defined in C VC Section 627, must consider the prevailing speeds, accident records, and highway, t raffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. Local authorities may also consider residential density and pedestrian and bicycle safety. Speed zones are also establishe d to advise motorist of road conditions or hazards, which may not be readily apparent to a rea sonable driver. For this reason, a field review of related road/traffic variables is conduct ed which is considered in combination with the statistical data and collision history of a particu lar roadway segment to determine a safe and reasonable speed limit. The specific procedures used in the performance of an Engineering and Traffic Study are outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device s, 2014 Edition (CA MUTCD). The statistical factors used to analyz e the collected speed survey data and additional factors as noted in the CA MUTCD to consider are defined in the following section.

2-1
SECTION 2 - SPEED SURVEY EVALUATION
Seventy-three (73) locations were evaluated by WEBB are included in this report. The location and the limits of each roadway segment are listed in Table 2-1.

Table 2-1 – Survey Locations and Limits
Street From To
Avenida Maravilla Vista Chino Tachevah Drive
Avenida Maravilla Tachevah Drive 30th Avenue
Avenida Maravilla 30th Avenue McCallum Way
Avenida Maravilla McCallum Way Ramon Road
Cathedral Canyon Drive Ramon Road 33rd Avenue
Cathedral Canyon Drive 33rd Avenue Dinah Shore Drive
Cathedral Canyon Drive Dinah Shore Drive Paseo Real
Cathedral Canyon Drive Paseo Real Kieley Road
Cathedral Canyon Drive Kieley Road Perez Road
Cathedral Canyon Drive Perez Road East Palm Canyon
Drive
Cathedral Canyon Drive East Palm Canyon Drive Kings Road Cathedral Canyon Drive Kings Road Terrace Road
Date Palm Drive Varner Road Vista Chino
Date Palm Drive Vista Chino 30th Avenue
Date Palm Drive 30th Avenue McCallum Way
Date Palm Drive McCallum Way Ramon Road
Date Palm Drive Ramon Road Dinah Shore Drive
Date Palm Drive Dinah Shore Drive 35th Avenue
Date Palm Drive 35th Avenue Gerald Ford Drive
Date Palm Drive Gerald Ford Drive Perez Road
Date Palm Drive Perez Road East Palm Canyon
Drive
Da Vall Drive 30th Avenue Ramon Road
Da Vall Drive Ramon Road Dinah Shore Drive
Da Vall Drive Gerald Ford Drive South City Limits
Dave Kelly Road Date Palm Drive Plumley Road
Dinah Shore Drive West City Limits Cathedral Canyon
Drive
Dinah Shore Drive Cathedral Canyon Drive Date Palm Drive Dinah Shore Drive Date Palm Drive Da Vall Drive
East Palm Canyon Drive Golf Club Drive Perez Road
East Palm Canyon Drive Perez Road Cathedral Canyon
Drive
East Palm Canyon Drive Cathedral Canyon Drive Date Palm Drive East Palm Canyon Drive Date Palm Drive East City Limits Edom Hill Road Varner Road Burrtec Transfer Station
Gerald Ford Drive Date Palm Drive Plumley Road

2-2
Street From To
Gerald Ford Drive Plumley Road Da Vall Drive
Landau Boulevard Verona Road Vista Chino
Landau Boulevard Vista Chino Tachevah Drive
Landau Boulevard Tachevah Drive 30th Avenue
Landau Boulevard 30th Avenue McCallum Way
Landau Boulevard McCallum Way Ramon Road
McCallum Way Landau Boulevard Avenida Maravilla
McCallum Way Avenida Maravilla Date Palm Drive
McCallum Way Date Palm Drive Santoro Drive
McCallum Way Santoro Drive Da Vall Drive
Mountain View Road Varner Road North City Limits
Palm Drive Interstate 10 Varner Road
Perez Road East Palm Canyon Drive Cathedral Canyon
Drive
Perez Road Cathedral Canyon Drive Date Palm Drive Drive Plumley Road Dave Kelley Road Dinah Shore Drive
Plumley Road Dinah Shore Drive 35th Avenue
Plumley Road 35th Avenue Gerald Ford Drive
Ramon Road San Luis Rey Drive Landau Boulevard
Ramon Road Landau Boulevard Cathedral Canyon
Drive
Ramon Road Cathedral Canyon Drive Date Palm Drive
Ramon Road Date Palm Drive Neuma Drive
Ramon Road Neuma Drive Da Vall Drive
San Antonio Drive San Mateo Drive Mission Drive
Santoro Drive 30th Avenue McCallum Way
San Luis Rey Drive Mission Drive Ramon Road
Tachevah Drive Landau Boulevard Avenida Maravilla
Tachevah Drive Avenida Maravilla Date Palm Drive
Varner Road West City Limits Edom Hill Road
Varner Road Edom Hill Road Date Palm Drive
Varner Road Date Palm Drive Bob Hope Drive
Vista Chino West City Limits Landau Boulevard
Vista Chino Landau Boulevard Avenida Maravilla
Vista Chino Avenida Maravilla Date Palm Drive
30th Avenue Landau Boulevard Avenida Maravilla
30th Avenue Avenida Maravilla Date Palm Drive
30th Avenue Date Palm Drive Santoro Drive
30th Avenue Santoro Drive Da Vall Drive
33rd Avenue Cathedral Canyon Drive Date Palm Drive
35th Avenue Date Palm Drive Plumley Road

2-3
 Field Review
Speed data was collected using calibrated radar spe ed guns and was performed by a sub- consultant to WEBB, Counts Unlimited. Each of the r adar speed surveys were made from an inconspicuously parked, unmarked vehicle. An effort was made to ensure that the presence of the vehicle in no way affected the speed of the tra ffic being surveyed. Field information from these speed surveys and other roadway characteristi cs were recorded on field data forms and later coded into engineering software for analysis purposes. CA MUTCD Section 2B.13 indicates that in order for the sample to be repres entative of the actual traffic flow, it is desirabl e to have a minimum sample of 100 vehicles for a spee d zone survey, but in no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles. In addition t o speed data, average daily traffic (ADT) volumes for each segment were collected from the su rvey using pneumatic tube counters and radar counts.

Examples of the field data collected for the purpos es of analyzing related roadway characteristics as they pertain to the determinatio n of appropriate speed limits are listed below.

The results of the field review for related roadway and traffic variables are summarized in the next section of this report.

1. Segment length, width and alignment;

2. Level of pedestrian and bicycle activity, truck volume;

3. Traffic flow characteristics;

4. Number of lanes and other channelization/stripin g factors;

5. Frequency of intersections, driveways, on-street parking, bike lanes;

6. Locations of stop signs, traffic signals, and ot her regulatory traffic control devices;

7. Roadway condition, bumps and dips;

8. Obstructions to driver/pedestrian visibility;

9. Land use and proximity of schools, parks/recreat ion areas and senior centers;

10. Uniformity with existing speed zones in adjacent jurisdictions; and

11. Any other unusual conditions or hazards not readily apparent to the driver.  Statistical Analysis Factors
Significant factors used to analyze the collected survey data are summarized below:
• 85th-Percentile Speed . The critical speed, or the 85th-percentile speed, is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This factor is the primary guide in determining what speed the majority of dri vers find safe and reasonable.

Therefore, the practice is to set the speed limit t o the nearest 5 mph increment from the 85th-percentile speed unless other factors require a lower limit. Speed limits set on this basis provide law enforcement officials with a mean s of controlling reckless or unreliable drivers who will not conform to what the majority finds reasonable. • 10-mph Pace . The 10-mph pace is the 10-mph increment range whi ch contains the largest number of recorded vehicles. This factor is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the sample surveyed. Speed limits should normally be set to fall within the 10-mph pace, however, conditions not readily appare nt to the driver or adhering to state mandated limits such as in residence districts may require setting speed limits below the 10-mph pace.
• 50th-Percentile Speed . The median speed, or 50th-percentile speed, repre sents the mid-point value within the range of recorded speeds for a particular roadway location. In other words, 50 percent of the vehicles travel fast er than, and 50 percent travel slower

2-4
than, the median speed. This value is another measu re of the central tendency of the vehicle speed distribution. Typically speed limits should not be set below the 50th- percentile speed, since it would result in greater than 50-percent of the drivers exceeding the speed limit.
• 15th-Percentile Speed . The 15th-percentile speed is that speed at or bel ow which 15 percent of the vehicles are traveling. This value i s important in determining the minimum allowable speed limit, given that the vehicles trav eling below this speed tend to obstruct the flow of traffic, thereby increasing the collision potential. • Percent of Vehicles in Pace Speed . The percent of vehicles in the 10-mph pace speed is an indication of the grouping of vehicular speed s. Ideally, if all vehicles were traveling at or about the same speed, there would be a reduce d likelihood of vehicular collisions.

In speed limit analysis, the higher the percent of vehicles within the pace speed, the more favorable the speed distribution. The percent of the 10-mph pace is often between 60 and 90 percent.
 2014 CA MUTCD Standard
The 2014 CA MUTCD Section 2B.13 sets the standard for establishing posted speed limits:

Standard: 12a When a speed limit is to be posted, i t shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic (CVC Section 22358.6(a)), except as shown in the two Opt ions below for rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC Section 2 2358.6(b)), or rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), or if using Standard:

If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph r eduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and j ustification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil o r Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compl iance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. additional 5 mph speed reduction on local agency ro adways for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a) (1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)).

Option:

1. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment o f the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mp h
increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in complian ce with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. CVC Sections 22353, 22353 .2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, may also be consider ed, if applicable. See Standard below for documentation re quirements.

Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(b).

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is u sed. Refer to CVC Section 21400(b). Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(c).

2-5
 Collision History
The Engineering and Traffic Survey forms summarize the available collision information for each of the street segments. The collision information w as gathered from the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) between January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2024.

Based on the number of total collisions per segment studied over the 4 year period and ADT volumes, a collision rate per million vehicle miles was calculated for the segment. To provide a general comparison of the collision rates on the se gment to expected collision rates for similar types of local roadways, the collision rate for the segment was compared to the statewide average rate listed in the 2022 Collision Data on C alifornia State Highways (road miles, travel, collisions, collision rates) 4 as listed in Table 2-2. Only the segments that exp erienced collisions due to unsafe speeds in the studied timeframe are s hown in the table. The calculated collision rate for the segment is shown on Table 2-3.

Table 2-2 – 2022 California State Highways Collision Rate

Table 2-3 - Collision Rate from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2024 Collision Rate Formula
(Number of Collisions * 1,000,000)
(Segment Length * ADT * 365 * # of Years)

4 California Department of Transportation, 2022 Collision Data on California State Highways (roa d miles, travel, collisions, collision rates) , revised in 2022
Lane Type Total Accidents per Million Vehicle Miles (AMVM) 2 and 3 Lane Roadway 0.96
4+ Lanes (Undivided Highway) 1. 10
4+ Lanes (Divided Highway) 0.93

2-6
Table 2-4 - Road Segment Collision Rates from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2024 Street From To
Averag
e Daily
Traffic
Lane
Type
Number
of
Collisions
(1/1/21-
12/31/24)

Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles
Avenida Maravilla Vista Chino Tachevah Drive 2,399 2 lanes 0 0.00 Avenida Maravilla Tachevah Drive 30th Avenue 3,183 2 lanes 2 0.87 Avenida Maravilla 30th Avenue McCallum Way 2,453 2 lanes 4 2.23 Avenida Maravilla McCallum Way Ramon Road 2,712 2 lanes 3 1.53 Cathedral Canyon Drive Ramon Road 33rd Avenue 8,765 4-5 lanes 4 0.63 Cathedral Canyon Drive 33rd Avenue Dinah Shore Drive 12,600 4-5 lanes 11 1.19 Cathedral Canyon Drive Dinah Shore Drive Paseo Real 14,964 4-5 lanes 1 0.10 Cathedral Canyon Drive Paseo Real Kieley Road 14,659 4-5 lanes 1 0.08 Cathedral Canyon Drive Kieley Road Perez Road 14,676 4-5 lanes 1 0.43 Cathedral Canyon Drive Perez Road East Palm Canyon Drive 8,667 4-5 lanes 2 0.54 Cathedral Canyon Drive East Palm Canyon Drive Kings Road 5,432 2-4 lanes 0 0 Cathedral Canyon Drive Kings Road Terrace Road 3,887 2 lanes 0 0 Date Palm Drive Varner Road Vista Chino 10,224 2-8 lanes 10 0.57 Date Palm Drive Vista Chino 30th Avenue 23,918 6-7 lanes 2 0.06 Date Palm Drive 30th Avenue McCallum Way 20,963 6-7 lanes 3 0.20 Date Palm Drive McCallum Way Ramon Road 22,160 6-7 lanes 7 0.43 Date Palm Drive Ramon Road Dinah Shore Drive 22,531 5-7 lanes 4 0.12 Date Palm Drive Dinah Shore Drive 35th Avenue 22,799 5-8 lanes 3 0.18 Date Palm Drive 35th Avenue Gerald Ford Drive 19,835 4-5 lanes 2 0.14 Date Palm Drive Gerald Ford Drive Perez Road 21,526 6-7 lanes 3 0.27 Date Palm Drive Perez Road East Palm Canyon Drive 16,590 6-7 lanes 0 0.00 Da Vall Drive 30th Avenue Ramon Road 8,394 4 lanes 0 0.00 Da Vall Drive Ramon Road Dinah Shore Drive 9,853 2-4 lanes 0 0.00 Da Vall Drive Gerald Ford Drive South City Limits 11,854 4 lanes 1 0.12 Dave Kelly Road Date Palm Drive Plumley Road 4,274 2-4 lanes 2 0.64 Dinah Shore Drive West City Limits Cathedral Canyon Drive 23,294 4-5 lanes 6 0.31 Dinah Shore Drive Cathedral Canyon Drive Date Palm Drive 23,420 4-6 lanes 13 0.76 Dinah Shore Drive Date Palm Drive Da Vall Drive 23,116 4-6 lanes 3 0.09 East Palm Canyon Drive Golf Club Drive Perez Road 38,615 4-5 lanes 10 0.23 East Palm Canyon Drive Perez Road Cathedral Canyon Drive 32,292 5-6 lanes 5 0.18 East Palm Canyon Drive Cathedral Canyon Drive Date Palm Drive 32,445 4 lanes 1 0.08 East Palm Canyon Drive Date Palm Drive East City Limits 40,956 5-6 lanes 2 0.09 Edom Hill Road Varner Road Burrtec Transfer Station 2,175 2 lanes 0 0.00 Gerald Ford Drive Date Palm Drive Plumley Road 11,861 4 lanes 1 0.12 Gerald Ford Drive Plumley Road Da Vall Drive 13,716 4 lanes 0 0.00 Landau Boulevard Verona Road Vista Chino 4,702 3 lanes 2 0.59 Landau Boulevard Vista Chino Tachevah Drive 13,922 4-5 lanes 1 0.10 Landau Boulevard Tachevah Drive 30th Avenue 14,375 4-5 lanes 1 0.10 Landau Boulevard 30th Avenue McCallum Way 19,429 4-5 lanes 5 0.35

2-7

Street From To
Averag
e Daily
Traffic
Lane
Type
Number
of
Collisions
(1/1/21-
12/31/24)

Accidents
per Million
Vehicle
Miles
Landau Boulevard McCallum Way Ramon Road 13,183 4-5 lanes 7 0.73 McCallum Way Landau Boulevard Avenida Maravilla 2,581 2 lanes 0 0 McCallum Way Avenida Maravilla Date Palm Drive 5,157 2-3 lanes 2 0.53 McCallum Way Date Palm Drive Santoro Drive 4,419 2-3 lanes 1 0.31 McCallum Way Santoro Drive Da Vall Drive 2,666 2 lanes 0 0.00 Mountain View Road Varner Road North City Limits 13,271 2 lanes 0 0.00 Palm Drive Interstate 10 Varner Road 30,564 4-6 lanes 2 0.05 Perez Road East Palm Canyon Drive Cathedral Canyon Drive 7,951 4-5 lanes 1 0.15 Perez Road Cathedral Canyon Drive Date Palm Drive 10,881 4-5 lanes 5 0.55 Plumley Road Dave Kelley Road Dinah Shore Drive 3,510 2-3 lanes 0 0.00 Plumley Road Dinah Shore Drive 35th Avenue 2,967 2-3 lanes 1 0.46 Plumley Road 35th Avenue Gerald Ford Drive 2,745 2-3 lanes 1 0.50 Ramon Road San Luis Rey Drive Landau Boulevard 39,377 4-7 lanes 4 0.09 Ramon Road Landau Boulevard Cathedral Canyon Drive 37,320 6-7 lanes 7 0.26 Ramon Road Cathedral Canyon Drive Date Palm Drive 34,164 6-7 lanes 0 0.00 Ramon Road Date Palm Drive Neuma Drive 30,617 6-7 lanes 2 0.11 Ramon Road Neuma Drive Da Vall Drive 27,855 6-7 lanes 2 0.08 San Antonio Drive San Mateo Drive Mission Drive 1,142 2 lanes 3 2.78 Santoro Drive 30th Avenue McCallum Way 1,438 2-3 lanes 0 0.00 San Luis Rey Drive Mission Drive Ramon Road 6,091 2-4 lanes 2 0.75 Tachevah Drive Landau Boulevard Avenida Maravilla 1,194 2 lanes 1 0.61 Tachevah Drive Avenida Maravilla Date Palm Drive 1,676 2 lanes 0 0.00 Varner Road West City Limits Edom Hill Road 13,246 2 lanes 0 0.00 Varner Road Edom Hill Road Date Palm Drive 16,831 2-3 lanes 2 0.07 Varner Road Date Palm Drive Bob Hope Drive 4,801 2 lanes 2 0.10 Vista Chino West City Limits Landau Boulevard 23,618 4 lanes 9 0.23 Vista Chino Landau Boulevard Avenida Maravilla 22,500 4-5 lanes 2 0.12 Vista Chino Avenida Maravilla Date Palm Drive 22,858 4 lanes 6 0.37 30th Avenue Landau Boulevard Avenida Maravilla 5,054 2-3 lanes 0 0.00 30th Avenue Avenida Maravilla Date Palm Drive 6,250 2-3 lanes 0 0.00 30th Avenue Date Palm Drive Santoro Drive 9,556 2-3 lanes 1 0.14 30th Avenue Santoro Drive Da Vall Drive 5,846 2-3 lanes 0 0.00 33rd Avenue Cathedral Canyon Drive Date Palm Drive 2,347 2 lanes 3 1.74 35th Avenue Date Palm Drive Plumley Road 939 2 lanes 0 0.00

3-1

SECTION 3 - RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The recommendations contained in this report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits.

Prima facie limits attempt to advise the motorist a nd enforcement of the reasonable speed for a particular section of roadway for the prevailing conditions.

The Engineering and Traffic Survey Sheets presented in this section illustrate the results of a thorough evaluation of the available data and indic ate a recommended speed limit for the street segment surveyed. A summary of the data analysis, a long with the recommended speed limit can be found in Table 3-1 followed by a description of the recommendations for roadway segments with changing posted speed limits or for s peed limits that were rounded down per CVC 21400(b).

Table 3-1 - Speed Survey Recommendations

Street From To
Existing
Speed
85th
%ile
Recommended
Speed Justification
Avenida Maravilla Vista Chino Tachevah Drive 25 MPH 35 MPH 25 MPH Residential District Avenida Maravilla Tachevah Drive 30th Avenue 25 MPH 36 MP H 25 MPH Residential District Avenida Maravilla 30th Avenue McCallum Way 25 MPH 33 MPH 25 MPH Residential District Avenida Maravilla McCallum Way Ramon Road 25 MPH 37 MPH 25 MPH Residential District Cathedral Canyon Drive Ramon Road 33rd Avenue 45 MPH 48 M PH 45 MPH CVC 22358.6 Cathedral Canyon Drive 33rd Avenue Dinah Shore Drive 45 MPH 47 MPH 45 MPH 85th Percentile Cathedral Canyon Drive Dinah Shore Drive Paseo Real 45 MPH 51 MPH 45 MPH CVC 22358.7 Cathedral Canyon Drive Paseo Real Kieley Road 40 MPH 49 MPH 40 MPH CVC 22358.7 & CVC 22358.6
Cathedral Canyon Drive Kieley Road Perez Road 35 MPH 45 MPH 35 MPH CVC 22358.7 Cathedral Canyon Drive Perez Road East Palm Canyon
Drive 35 MPH 40 MPH 35 MPH CVC 22358.7
Cathedral Canyon Drive East Palm Canyon
Drive Kings Road 25 MPH 35 MPH 25 MPH CVC 22358.7
Cathedral Canyon Drive Kings Road Terrace Road 25 MPH 38 MPH 25 MPH Residential District Date Palm Drive Varner Road Vista Chino 55 MPH 56 MPH 55 MPH 85th Percentile

3-2

Street From To Existing
Speed
85th
%ile
Recommended
Speed Justification
Date Palm Drive Vista Chino 30th Avenue 55 MPH 58 MPH 50 MPH CVC 22358.6 & CVC 22358.7
Date Palm Drive 30th Avenue McCallum Way 45 MPH 54 MPH 45 MPH CVC 22358.6 & CVC 22358.7
Date Palm Drive McCallum Way Ramon Road 45 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH 85th Percentile Date Palm Drive Ramon Road Dinah Shore Drive 45 MPH 49 MPH 45 MPH CVC 22358.6 Date Palm Drive Dinah Shore Drive 35th Avenue 45 MPH 47 MPH 45 MPH 85th Percentile Date Palm Drive 35th Avenue Gerald Ford Drive 45 MPH 47 MPH 45 MPH 85th Percentile Date Palm Drive Gerald Ford Drive Perez Road 40 MPH 45 MPH 40 MPH 85th Percentile & CVC 22358.7
Date Palm Drive Perez Road
East Palm Canyon
Drive
30 / 40
MPH
45 MPH 40 MPH 85th Percentile &
CVC 22358.7
Da Vall Drive 30th Avenue Ramon Road 45 MPH 47 MPH 45 MPH 85t h Percentile Da Vall Drive Ramon Road Dinah Shore Drive 50 MPH 51 MP H 50 MPH 85th Percentile Da Vall Drive Gerald Ford Drive South City Limits 45 MPH 51 MPH 45 MPH CVC 22358.7 Dave Kelly Road Date Palm Drive Plumley Road 35 MPH 41 MPH 35 MPH CVC 22358.7 Dinah Shore Drive West City Limits Cathedral Canyon
Drive 45 MPH 47 MPH 45 MPH 85th Percentile
Dinah Shore Drive Cathedral Canyon
Drive Date Palm Drive 45 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH 85th Percentile Dinah Shore Drive Date Palm Drive Da Vall Drive 50 MP H 50 MPH 50 MPH 85th Percentile East Palm Canyon Drive Golf Club Drive Perez Road 45 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH 85th Percentile East Palm Canyon Drive Perez Road Cathedral Canyon
Drive 45 MPH 48 MPH 45 MPH CVC 22358.6
East Palm Canyon Drive Cathedral Canyon
Drive Date Palm Drive 45 MPH 42 MPH 45 MPH CVC 22358.7
East Palm Canyon Drive Date Palm Drive East City Li mits 50 MPH 51 MPH 50 MPH 85th Percentile Edom Hill Road Varner Road Burrtec Transfer
Station 40 MPH 47 MPH 40 MPH CVC 22358.6
Gerald Ford Drive Date Palm Drive Plumley Road 50 MPH 50 MPH 50 MPH 85th Percentile Gerald Ford Drive Plumley Road Da Vall Drive 50 MPH 50 MPH 50 MPH 85th Percentile

3-3

Street From To Existing
Speed
85th
%ile
Recommended
Speed Justification
Landau Boulevard Verona Road Vista Chino 45 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 85th Percentile Landau Boulevard Vista Chino Tachevah Drive 45 MPH 52 M PH 45 MPH 85th Percentile Landau Boulevard Tachevah Drive 30th Avenue 45 MPH 50 MPH 45 MPH CVC 22358.7 Landau Boulevard 30th Avenue McCallum Way 45 MPH 52 MPH 45 MPH CVC 22358.7 Landau Boulevard McCallum Way Ramon Road 45 MPH 51 MPH 45 MPH CVC 22358.7 McCallum Way Landau Boulevard Avenida Maravilla 25 MP H 33 MPH 25 MPH Residential District McCallum Way Avenida Maravilla Date Palm Drive 25 MPH 35 MPH 25 MPH CVC 22358.7 McCallum Way Date Palm Drive Santoro Drive 30 MPH 32 MP H 25 MPH Residential District McCallum Way Santoro Drive Da Vall Drive 30 MPH 36 MPH 25 MPH Residential District Mountain View Road Varner Road North City Limits 55 M PH 54 MPH 50 MPH CVC 22358.6 Palm Drive Interstate 10 Varner Road 60 MPH 61 MPH 55 MPH CVC 22358.7 Perez Road East Palm Canyon
Drive
Cathedral Canyon
Drive 40 MPH 43 MPH 40 MPH 85th Percentile
Perez Road Cathedral Canyon
Drive Date Palm Drive 40 MPH 45 MPH 40 MPH CVC 22358.7
Plumley Road Dave Kelley Road Dinah Shore Drive 35 MP H 37 MPH 35 MPH 85th Percentile Plumley Road Dinah Shore Drive 35th Avenue 35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH 85th Percentile Plumley Road 35th Avenue Gerald Ford Drive 35 MPH 40 MPH 35 MPH CVC 22358.7 Ramon Road San Luis Rey Drive Landau Boulevard 45 MPH 50 MPH 45 MPH CVC 22358.7 Ramon Road Landau Boulevard Cathedral Canyon
Drive 40 MPH 44 MPH 40 MPH 85th Percentile &
CVC 22358.7
Ramon Road Cathedral Canyon
Drive Date Palm Drive 40 MPH 46 MPH 40 MPH 85th Percentile & CVC 22358.7
Ramon Road Date Palm Drive Neuma Drive 50 MPH 47 MPH 45 M PH 85th Percentile Ramon Road Neuma Drive Da Vall Drive 50 MPH 53 MPH 45 MPH

85th Percentile &
CVC 22358.7

3-4

Street From To Existing
Speed
85th
%ile
Recommended
Speed Justification
San Antonio Drive San Mateo Drive Mission Drive 25 MP H 33 MPH 25 MPH CVC 22358.6 & CVC 22358.7
Santoro Drive 30th Avenue McCallum Way 25 MPH 42 MPH 35 MPH CVC 22358.7 San Luis Rey Drive Mission Drive Ramon Road 25 MPH 34 M PH 25 MPH CVC 22358.6 & CVC 22358.7
Tachevah Drive Landau Boulevard Avenida Maravilla 25 MPH 34 MPH 25 MPH Residential District Tachevah Drive Avenida Maravilla Date Palm Drive 25 M PH 35 MPH 25 MPH Residential District Varner Road West City Limits Edom Hill Road 55 MPH 52 M PH 50 MPH 85th Percentile Varner Road Edom Hill Road Date Palm Drive 55 MPH 56 MP H 55 MPH 85th Percentile Varner Road Date Palm Drive Bob Hope Drive 55 MPH 59 MP H 55 MPH CVC 22358.6 Vista Chino West City Limits Landau Boulevard 55 MPH 56 MPH 50 MPH CVC 22358.7 Vista Chino Landau Boulevard Avenida Maravilla 55 MPH 56 MPH 50 MPH CVC 22358.7 Vista Chino Avenida Maravilla Date Palm Drive 55 MPH 53 MPH 50 MPH CVC 22358.6 30th Avenue Landau Boulevard Avenida Maravilla 35 MPH 39 MPH 35 MPH CVC 22358.6 30th Avenue Avenida Maravilla Date Palm Drive 35 MPH 38 M PH 35 MPH CVC 22358.6 30th Avenue Date Palm Drive Santoro Drive 45 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 85th Percentile 30th Avenue Santoro Drive Da Vall Drive 45 MPH 48 MPH 45 MP H CVC 22358.6 33rd Avenue Cathedral Canyon
Drive Date Palm Drive 25 / 30
MPH 34 MPH 30 MPH CVC 22358.6
35th Avenue Date Palm Drive Plumley Road 30 MPH 36 MPH 30 M PH CVC 22358.7

3-5

 Avenida Maravilla

Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, Avenida Maravilla is separated into four segments:
• Visa Chino Drive and Tachevah Drive
• Tachevah Drive to 30 th Avenue
• 30th Avenue to McCallum Way
• McCallum Way to Ramon Road

Avenida Maravilla, between Vista Chino Drive and Ta chevah Drive is a two (2) lane divided north-south roadway with double yellow center line striping. The studied segment is approximately 2,649 feet long with a curb-to-curb w idth of 36 feet. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the segment, no existing bike faci lities, and sidewalks exist on both sides throughout the segment. There are two (2) all-way s top intersections and two (2) signalized intersection. The surrounding land uses are residen tial and Panorama Park. There are 25 mph speed limit signs on the roadway segment.

Avenida Maravilla, between Tachevah Dr and 30
th Ave is a two (2) lane divided north-south
roadway with double-yellow centerline striping. The studied segment is 2,625 feet long and 39 feet wide. On-street parking is allowed on both sid es of the segment with no existing bike facilities and sidewalk exists throughout the road segment. There are three (3) all-way stops.

The surrounding land uses are all residential with Panorama Park at the northeast corner of Avenida Maravilla and Tachevah Drive. There are 25 mph speed limit signs posted on the roadway segment.

Avenida Maravilla, between 30
th Avenue and McCallum Way is a two (2) lane divided north- south roadway with double-yellow centerline stripin g from 30 th Ave to Perlita Road and no double from Perlita Road to McCallum Way. The studied segment is 2,650 feet long and 39 feet wide. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the segment with no existing bike facilities and sidewalk existing throughout this segment. Ther e are three (3) all-way stops. The surrounding land uses are mostly residential and so me vacant lots. There are 25 mph speed limit signs posted on the roadway segment.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Avenida
Maravilla
Vista Chino
Drive
Tachevah
Drive 25 35 30 26 26-35 75% 0 25 Residential District
Avenida
Maravilla
Tachevah
Drive
30 th
Avenue 25 36 36 30 25 72% 0.87 25 Residential District
Avenida
Maravilla 30 th Avenue McCallum
Way 25 33 29 26 25-34 84% 2.23 25 Residential District Avenida
Maravilla
McCallum
Way
Ramon
Road 25 37 31 26 25-34 73% 1.53 25 Residential District

3-6

Avenida Maravilla, between McCallum Way and Ramon R oad is a two (2) lane divided north- south roadway with no double-yellow centerline striping. The studied segment is 2,625 feet long and 39 feet wide. On-street parking is allowed on b oth sides of the segment with no existing bike facilities and sidewalk mostly existing with t he exception of some undeveloped areas.

There is one (1) signalized intersection and two (2 ) all-way stops. The surrounding land uses are mostly residential and some vacant lots, 76 Gas oline & Convenience Store, AMPM Gasoline & Convenience Store. There are 25 mph spee d limit signs posted on the roadway segment.
 Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed of 35 mph indicates a speed limit of 35 mph between Vista Chino Drive and Tachevah Drive. There are approximately 2 ,399 vehicles per day within this road segment. The speed survey was conducted on January 14, 2025. Within 4 years, there was 0 collisions. Rounding the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment in dicates a speed limit of 35 mph between Vista Chino Drive and Tache vah Drive. This segment qualifies as a residential district as there are 32 homes within a distance of a half of mile fronting the street.

Based on the observed conditions and per CVC Divisi on 1 Section 515, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Avenida Maravilla between Vista Chino Drive and Tachevah Drive to remain 25 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 36 mph indicates a speed limit of 35 mph between Tachevah Drive and 30 th Avenue. There are approximately 3,183 vehicles per day within this road segment. The speed survey was conducted on January 14, 2025. Wit hin 4 years, there were 2 collisions with collision rate of 0.87, which is lower than the sta te’s collision rate. The 85 th -percentile speed indicates a speed limit of 35 mph between Tachevah Drive and 30 th Avenue. This segment qualifies as a residential district as there are 50 homes within a distance of a half of mile fronting the street. Based on the observed conditions and pe r CVC Division 1 Section 515, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Avenida Maravilla between Tachevah Drive and 30 th Avenue to remain 25 mph.

The 85th-percentile speed of 33 mph indicates a spe ed limit of 35 mph between 30th Avenue and McCallum Way. There are approximately 2,453 veh icles per day within this road segment.

The speed survey was conducted on February 4, 2025. Within 4 years, there were 4 collisions with collision rate of 2.23 which is higher that th e State collision rate. This segment qualifies as a residential district as there are 34 homes within a distance of a half of mile fronting the street.

Based on the observed conditions and per CVC Divisi on 1 Section 515, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Avenida Maravilla between 30th Avenue and McCallum Way to remain 25 mph. Further traffic calming applications may need to be applied.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 37 mph indicates a speed limit of 35 mph between McCallum Way and Ramon Road and there were 3 collisions during the past 4 years with a collision rate of 1.53 which is higher that the State collision rate. Ther e are approximately 2,712 vehicles per day within this road segment. The speed survey was cond ucted on January 14, 2025. Rounding down results of the speed survey indicate a speed l imit of 35 mph between McCallum Way and Ramon Road. This segment qualifies as a residential district as there are 42 homes within a distance of a half of mile fronting the street. Bas ed on the observed conditions and per CVC Division 1 Section 515, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Avenida Maravilla between McCallum Way and Ramon Road to remain 25 mp h. Further traffic calming applications may need to be applied.

3-7

 Cathedral Canyon Drive
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, Cathedral Canyon Drive is separated into eight segments:
• Ramon Road to 33 rd Avenue
• 33 rd Avenue to Dinah Shore Drive
• Dinah Shore Drive to Paseo Real
• Paseo Real to Kieley Road
• Kieley Road to Perez Road
• Perez Road to East Palm Canyon drive
• East Palm Canyon to Kings Road
• Kings Road to Terrace Road
Cathedral Canyon Drive, between Ramon Road and 33rd Avenue, is a north-south four (4) lane divided roadway with a two-way left turn median. The studied segment is approximately 2,640 feet long and 64 feet wide. On-street parking is not allowed, but there are existing bike lanes on both sides of the street, and sidewalks exist throughout this road segment. There is one (1) signalized intersection at Ramon Rd. The surrounding land uses are residential, Gentry Plaza Shopping Center, Larry's Market Liquor & Deli, Tortilla's Restaurant, The Spring Church, some Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
Ramon
Road
33 rd
Avenue 45 48 43 37 39-48 69%

0.63 45 CVC Section 22358.6
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
33 rd
Avenue
Dinah
Shore
Drive
45 47 42 37 36-45 71%

1.19 45

85 th Percentile
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
Dinah
Shore Drive Paseo Real 45 51 44 40 39-48 70%

0.10 45 CVC Section 22358.6
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
Paseo Real Kieley
Road 40 49 43 37 38-47 63%

0.08 40 CVC Section 22358.6
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
Kieley Road Perez Road 35 45 41 38 37-46 86%

0.43 35 85 th Percentile & CVC
Section 22358.7
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
Perez Road
East Palm
Canyon
Drive
35 40 35 31 30-39 76%

0.54 35 Section 22358.6
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
East Palm
Canyon
Drive
Kings Road 25 35 31 24 26-35 70% 0 25 Section 22358 .7
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
Kings Road Terrace
Road 25 38 31 26 29-38 59% 0 25 Residential District

3-8

commercial areas, and vacant lots. There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted on the roadway segment.

Cathedral Canyon Drive, between 33rd Avenue and Dinah Shore Drive, is a north-south four (4) lane divided roadway with a two-way left turn. The studied segment is approximately 2,650 feet long and 64 feet wide. On-street parking is not all owed, but there is existing bike lanes on both sides of the street. There are two-way stop-control led intersections. Sidewalks exist throughout this road segment. There is one (1) signalized inte rsection, and a pedestrian push button is present. The surrounding land uses are residential, Palm Springs Church of the Nazarene, Calvary Christian Center, 7-Eleven Convenience Stor e, some commercial areas, and vacant lots. There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted on the roadway segment.

Cathedral Canyon Drive, between Dinah Shore Drive a nd Paseo Real, is a north-south four (4) lane divided roadway with a two-way left turn media n. The studied segment is approximately 2,520 feet long and 64 feet wide. On-street parking is not allowed, but there is existing bike lanes on the west side of the street. Sidewalks exi st on the west side and multiuse trail on the east side. There is one (1) signalized intersection and one (1) pedestrian crossing. The surrounding land uses are mainly residential. There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted on the roadway segment and speed radar.

Cathedral Canyon Drive, between Paseo Real and Kiel ey Road, is a north-south four (4) lane divided roadway with a two-way left turn median. Th e studied segment is approximately 2,990 feet long and 64 feet wide. On-street parking is no t allowed, but there are existing bike lanes on both sides of the street. Sidewalks exist on the west side and there is a multiuse trail on the east side. The surrounding land uses are residential, Hy att Vacation Club, Cathedral Canyon Country Club, Cathedral Canyon Business Park, Unite d Equipment Rentals, White Water Path Trailhead, and commercial areas. There is a pedestr ian crossing. There are 40 mph speed limit signs posted on the northbound of the roadway segme nt and a 30 mph advisory sign posted on the bridge.

Cathedral Canyon Drive, between Kieley Road and Per ez Road, is a north-south four (4) lane divided roadway with a two-way left turn median. The studied segment is approximately 580 feet long and 64 feet wide. On-street parking is not allowed, but there are existing bike lanes on both sides of the street. Sidewalks exist throughout the road segment. There is one (1) signalized intersection. The surrounding land uses are Souther n California Edison, Raya's Smog Check & Registration Services, Autobody & Paint Shop, Fix A uto Collision, Atomic Budz, Finish Master Automotive Industrial Paint, and several commercial driveways fronting the road segment.

There is a 35 mph speed limit sign posted on the roadway segment.

Cathedral Canyon Drive, between Perez Road and East Palm Canyon Drive, is a north-south four (4) lane divided roadway with a two-way left t urn median. The studied segment is approximately 1,540 feet long and 64 feet wide. On- street parking is not allowed, but there are existing bike lanes on both sides of the street. Si dewalks exist throughout the road segment.

There are three (3) signalized intersections. The s urrounding land uses consist of restaurant facilities, automotive RV repair, OGS Auto Accessor ies, Trunks Bar, a dispensary, Coachella Valley Repertory Box Office, and Cathedral City Amp hitheater. There are 35 mph speed limit signs posted on the roadway segment.

Cathedral Canyon Drive, between East Palm Canyon Dr ive and Kings Road, is a north-south two (2) lane divided roadway with centerline stripi ng and left turn lanes. The studied segment is approximately 760 feet long and 64 feet wide. On-st reet parking is allowed on the west side of

3-9

the street, and there are existing bike lanes on bo th sides of the street between two (2) locations. Sidewalks exist except in undeveloped areas. There is one (1) signalized intersection.

The surrounding land uses are residential, Taco Bel l, Palm Canyon Plaza, Circle K, Cathedral Canyon Courtyard, Dental Arts, Cathedral City Senio r Center, and some vacant lots. There are 25 mph speed limit signs posted on the roadway segment.

Cathedral Canyon Drive, between Kings Road and Terr ace Road, is a north-south two (2) lane divided roadway with yellow dashed centerline strip ing. The studied segment is approximately 2,170 feet long and 38 feet wide. On-street parking is not allowed, but there are existing bike lanes on both sides of the street. Sidewalks exist except in undeveloped areas. There is one (1) all-way stop. The surrounding land uses are residen tial, First Southern Baptist Church, and some vacant lots. There are 25 mph speed limit signs posted on the roadway segment.

 Recommendations
The 85th-percentile speed of 48 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between Ramon Road to 33rd Avenue. There are approximately 8,765 vehicles per day within this road segment. The speed survey was conducted on January 14, 2025. Within 4 years, there were 4 collisions with a collision rate of 0.63, which is lower than the sta te’s collision rate. Rounding down the 85th- percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment ind icates a speed limit of 45 mph. Based on the observed conditions and 85th percentile speed, per CVC Section 22358.6 it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Cathedral Canyon Dri ve between Ramon Road and 33rd Avenue to remain 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 47 mph indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between 33rd Avenue and Dinah Shore Drive. There are approximately 12,6 00 vehicles per day within this road segment. The speed survey was conducted on January 14,2025. Within 4 years, there were 11 collisions with a collision rate of 1.19 which is higher than the state’s collision rate. Rounding the 85 th -percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment in dicates a speed limit of 45 mph in this segment. Based on the observed conditions, and 85 th percentile, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Cathedral Canyon Drive betwee n 33rd Avenue and Dinah Shore Drive to remain 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed is 51 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between Dinah Shore Drive and Paseo Real. There are approximately 14,96 4 vehicles per day within this road segment. The speed survey conducted on January 14, 2025. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision with a collision rate of 0.10. Rounding t he 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment indicates a speed limit of 50 mph. Based on the observed conditions, 85 th percentile speed, it is recommended that the posted speed limi t on Cathedral Canyon Drive between Dinah Shore Drive and Paseo Real to remain 45 mph.

The 85th-percentile speed of 49 mph indicates a spe ed limit of 50 mph between Paseo Real and Kieley Road. There are approximately 14,659 veh icles per day within this road segment.

The speed survey was conducted on January 14, 2025. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision with a collision rate of 0.08. Rounding down the 85
th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph,
indicates a speed of 45 mph. The surrounding land u ses are expected to generate bicycle traffic. Based on the advisory speed of 35 mph on t he bridge and existing conditions, per CVC Section 22358.6 and CVC Section 22358.7, it is reco mmended that the posted speed limit on Cathedral Canyon Drive between Paseo Real and Kieley Road to remain 40 mph.

3-10

The 85th-percentile speed of 45 mph indicates a spe ed limit of 45 mph between Kieley Road and Perez Road. There are approximately 14,676 vehi cles per day within this road segment.

The speed survey was conducted on January 14, 2205. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision with a collision rate of 0.43, which is lower than the state’s collision rate. Due to surrounding businesses and bicycle traffic, based on conditions per CVC Section 22358.7, along with lane consistency adhering to section CVC Section 22358.8 stating current speed limits could be retained, it is recommended that the posted speed l imit on Cathedral Canyon Drive between Kieley Road and Perez Road to remain 35 mph.

The 85th-percentile speed of 40 mph indicates a spe ed limit of 40 mph between Perez Road and East Palm Canyon Drive. There are approximately 8,667 vehicles per day within this road segment. The speed survey was conducted on January 14, 2025. Within 4 years, there were 2 collisions with a collision rate of 0.54 which is l ower than the state’s collision rate. The segment is expected to generate pedestrian and bicycle traf fic due to surrounding land uses. Based on the observed conditions and 22358.7, it is recommen ded that the posted speed limit on Cathedral Canyon Drive between Perez Road and East Palm Canyon Drive to be 35 mph.

The 85th-percentile speed of 35 mph indicates a spe ed limit of 35 mph between East Palm Canyon Drive and Kings Road. There are approximatel y 5,432 vehicles per day within this road segment. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions. T he speed survey was conducted on January 14, 2025. Due to surrounding businesses based on co nditions per CVC Section 22358.7 and lane consistency aligning with CVC Section 22358.8, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Cathedral Canyon Drive between East Palm C anyon Drive and Kings Road to be 25 mph.

The 85th-percentile speed of 38 mph indicates a spe ed limit of 40 mph between Kings Road and Terrace Road. There are approximately 3,887 veh icles per day within this road segment.

Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions. The speed survey was conducted on January 14, 2025.

Rounding down the 85
th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment indicates a speed limit of 35 mph. Based on the calculation of (.41 miles/. 25 miles), which results in a ratio of 1.64, pointing to a minimum of 22 or 27 houses on this se gment, which is exceeded, which qualifies as a residential district. Based on the speed surve y report and per CVC Division 1 Section 515, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Ca thedral Canyon Drive between Kings Road and Terrace Road to be 25 mph.

3-11

 Date Palm Drive
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, Date Palm Drive is separated into nine segments:
• Varner Road to Vista Chino Drive
• Vista Chino Drive to 30 th Avenue
• 30 th Avenue to McCallum Way
• McCallum Way to Ramon Road
• Ramon Road to Dinah Shore Drive
• Dinah Shore Drive to 35 th Avenue
• 35 th Avenue to Gerald Ford Drive
• Gerald Ford Drive to Perez Road
• Perez Road to East Palm Canyon Drive

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Date Palm
Drive
Varner
Road
Vista
Chino
Drive
55 56 51 46 46-55 70%

0.63 55

85 th Percentile
Date Palm
Drive
Vista Chino
Drive
30 th
Avenue 55 58 51 45 46-55 60%

0.06 50

CVC 22358.6 & CVC
22358.7
Date Palm
Drive
30 th
Avenue
McCallum
Way 45 54 48 42 44-53 66%

0.20 45

CVC 22358.6 & CVC
22358.7
Date Palm
Drive
McCallum
Way
Ramon
Road 45 45 40 33 36-45 64%

0.43 45

85 th Percentile
Date Palm
Drive
Ramon
Road
Dinah
Shore
Drive
45 49 45 40 40-49 78%

0.12 45

CVC 22358.6
Date Palm
Drive
Dinah
Shore Drive
35 th
Avenue 45 47 42 37 37-46 71%

0.18 45

85 th Percentile
Date Palm
Drive
35 th
Avenue
Gerald
Ford
Drive
45 47 42 38 38-47 73%

0.14 45

85 th Percentile
Date Palm
Drive
Gerald Ford
Drive
Perez
Road 40 45 41 36 36-45 73%

0.27 40

CVC Section 22358.7
Date Palm
Drive Perez Road
East Palm
Canyon
Drive
30 45 39 32 32-41 58%

0 40

CVC Section 22358.7

3-12

Date Palm Drive, between Varner Road and Vista Chino Drive, is a north-south two (2) to six (6) lane divided highway with centerline striping and a median. The studied segment is approximately 6,200 feet long and varies from 25 fe et to 110 feet in width. On-street parking is not allowed, and there are bike lanes on both sides of the street. Sidewalks exist only between Vista Chino and the I-10 freeway ramp. There are th ree (3) signalized intersections, as well as one (1) all-way stop. The surrounding land uses inc lude ARCO Gasoline, Chelo's Bakery, and vacant areas. There are 50 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

Date Palm Drive, between Vista Chino Drive and 30th Avenue, is a north-south six (6) to seven (7) lane divided highway with a median and left turn lane. The studied segment is approximately 5,280 feet long and 85 feet wide. On-street parking is not allowed, and there are no bike lanes or shoulders on either side of the street. Sidewalk s exists on the west side of the street. There are two (2) signalized intersections. The surroundi ng land uses include Mobil Gasoline, Optometry Outstanding Vision Care, La Hermosa Churc h, a retail plaza, and vacant areas.

There are 50 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

Date Palm Drive, between 30th Avenue and McCallum Way, is a north-south six (6) to seven (7) lane divided highway with a median and left turn la ne. The studied segment is approximately 2,650 feet long and 85 feet wide. On-street parking is not allowed, and there are no bike lanes or shoulders on either side of the street. Sidewalk s exist on the west side and in developed areas on the east side of the segment. There are tw o (2) signalized intersections. The surrounding land uses include commercial areas, Nor thgate Community Church, Walgreens Pharmacy, Grocery Outlet, Dollar Tree, a retail pla za, and vacant areas. There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

Date Palm Drive, between McCallum Way and Ramon Roa d, is a north-south six (6) to seven (7) lane divided highway with a two-way left turn m edian. The studied segment is approximately 2,650 feet long and 85 feet wide. On-street parking is not allowed, and there are no bike lanes on either side of the street. Sidewalks exist throu ghout this road segment. There are three (3) signalized intersections. The surrounding land uses include commercial areas, Date Palm Plaza, Date Palm Centre, Circle K, residential prop erties, and vacant areas. There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

Date Palm Drive, between Ramon Road and Dinah Shore , is a north-south five (5) to seven (7) lane divided highway with a two-way left turn media n. The studied segment is approximately 5,285 feet long and varies in width from 85 feet to 105 feet. On-street parking is allowed, but there are no bike lanes on either side of the stree t. Sidewalks exist on most of the segment, except for undeveloped areas. There are four (4) si gnalized intersections. The surrounding land uses include commercial areas, Tower Market gas sta tion, Ramon Plaza, Cathedral Village Plaza, Plaza Ruiz, USPS, the City Branch Library, r esidential areas, a post office, a park, and vacant lots. There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

Date Palm Drive, between Dinah Shore and 35th Avenu e, is a north-south five (5) lane divided highway with a median and a two-way left median. Th e studied segment is approximately 2,650 feet long and 66 feet wide. On-street parking is no t allowed, and there are no bike lanes on either side of the street. Sidewalks exist on most of the segment, except for undeveloped areas.

There are three (3) signalized intersections. The s urrounding land uses include Cathedral City Market Place, a chiropractor, SR Appliances, Lesley 's Upholstery, Transmissions 4 Less, Allied Refrigeration Inc., VIP Plaza, commercial areas, re sidential properties, and vacant lots. There are 40 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

3-13

Date Palm Drive, between 35th Avenue and Gerald For d Drive, is a north-south five (5) lane undivided highway with a two-way left turn median. The studied segment is approximately 2,650 feet long and varies from 66 feet to 86 feet in wid th. On-street parking is not allowed, and there are no bike lanes on either side of the street. Sid ewalks exist throughout the road segment.

There are two (2) signalized intersections. The sur rounding land uses include Date Palm Plaza, Esplanade Plaza, U.S. Bank, MEG Auto Detailing Supp lies & Solutions, Mission Plaza Shopping Center, Amazon Warehouse DJW8, and vacant lots. There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

Date Palm Drive, between Gerald Ford Drive and Pere z Road, is a north-south three (3) to five (5) lane divided highway with a median and a two-wa y left median. The studied segment is approximately 1,860 feet long and varies in width f rom 96 feet to 101 feet. On-street parking is not allowed, and there are no bike lanes on either side of the street. Sidewalks exist throughout this segment. There are two (2) signalized intersec tions. The surrounding land uses include ARCO Gasoline, Jiffy Lube, commercial areas, residential properties, and vacant lots. There are 40 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

Date Palm Drive, between Perez Road and East Palm C anyon Drive, is a north-south five (5) to seven (7) lane divided highway with a median and a two-way left turn median. The studied segment is approximately 1,400 feet long and 89 fee t wide. On-street parking is not allowed, and there are no bike lanes on either side of the s treet, except for the segment between Buddy Rogers Avenue and East Palm Canyon heading southbou nd. Sidewalks exist on most of the segment, except for undeveloped areas. There are th ree (3) signalized intersections. The surrounding land uses include Carter Animal Hospita l, Agua Caliente Casino, Cathedral Gateway, residential areas, and vacant lots. There are 40 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.
 Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed of 56 indicates a speed limit of 55 mph between Varner Road and Vista Chino Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 23, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 10,224 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 10 collisions with a collision rate of 0.63 which is lower than the state’s collision rate. Rounding the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment indicates a speed of 55 mph. Based on the observed conditions and 85 th percentile, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Date Palm Drive between Varner Road and Vista Chino Drive to remain 55 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 58 indicates a speed limit of 60 mph between Vista Chino Drive and 30 th Avenue. The speed survey conducted on January 23, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 23,918 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 6 collisions with a collision rate of 0.06 which is lower than the state’s collision rate. Rounding down the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph, indicates a speed of 55 mph. There is the potential for vulnerable users on and around this segment of roadway due to the adjacent bike lanes on Vista Chino and 30th Avenue, along with the nearby middle school near the southern end of the segment. Based on the observed conditions, 85 th percentile per CVC 22358.6, and CVC 22358.7, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Date Palm Drive between Vista Chino Drive and 30 th Avenue to be 50 mph.

3-14

The 85
th -percentile speed of 54 mph indicates a speed limit of 55 mph between 30 th Avenue and McCallum Way. The speed survey conducted on January 23, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 20,963 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 3 collisions with a collision rate of 0.20 which is less than the State collision rate. Rounding down the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment indicates a speed of 50 mph. There is the potential for vulnerable users on and around this segment of roadway due to the nearby bike lanes on 30th Avenue along with adjacent retail and church land uses. Based on the observed conditions, 85 th percentile per CVC 22358.6, and CVC 22358.7, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Date Palm Drive between 30 th Avenue and McCallum Way to be remain 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 45 indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between McCullum Way and Ramon Road. The speed survey conducted on January 23, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 22,160 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 7 collisions with a collision rate of 0.43 which is lower than the state’s collision rate. Rounding the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment indicates a speed of 45 mph. Based on the observed conditions and 85 th percentile, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Date Palm Drive between McCallum Way and Ramon Road to remain 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 49 indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between Ramon Road and Dinah Shore Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 23, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 22,531 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 4 collisions with a collision rate of 0.12 which is lower than the state’s collision rate. Rounding down the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph, indicates a speed of 45 mph. Based on the observed conditions and 85 th percentile per CVC 22358.6, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Date Palm Drive between Ramon Road and Dinah Shore Drive to remain 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 47 indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between Dinah Shore Drive and 35 th Avenue. The speed survey conducted on January 23, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 22,799 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 3 collisions with a collision rate of 0.18 which is lower than the state’s collision rate. Rounding the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment indicates a speed of 45 mph. Based on the observed conditions and 85 th percentile, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Date Palm Drive between Dinah Shore Druve and 35 th Avenue to remain 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 47 indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between 35 th Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 23, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 19,835 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 2 collisions with a collision rate of 0.14 which is lower than the state’s collision rate. Rounding the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment indicates a speed of 45 mph. Based on the observed conditions and 85 th percentile, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Date Palm Drive between 35 th Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive to remain 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 45 indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between Gerald Ford Drive and Perez Road. The speed survey conducted on January 23, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 21,526 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 3 collisions with a collision rate of 0.27 which is lower than the state’s collision rate. Based on the observed conditions, the bridge conditions, bicycle facilities, and 85 th percentile, per the CA

3-15

MUTCD Section 2B.13 and CVC Section 22358.7 it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Date Palm Drive between Gerald Ford Drive and Perez Road to remain 40 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 45 indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between Perez Road and East Palm Canyon Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 23, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 16,590 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions. Given the Casino and the surrounding land uses within the segment, there is an expected high concentration of bicyclists and pedestrians. Based on the observed conditions, CVC Section 22358.7, pace range, 85 th percentile, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Date Palm Drive between Perez Road and East Palm Canyon Drive to be 40 mph.

3-16

 Da Vall Drive
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, Da Vall Drive is separated into three segments:
• 30 th Avenue to Ramon Road
• Ramon Road to Dinah Shore Drive
• Gerald Ford Drive to South City Limits
Da Vall Drive, between 30th Avenue and Ramon Road, is a north-south two (2) to five (5) lane undivided highway with double yellow striping and a two-way left turn median. The studied segment is approximately 5,280 feet long and 62 feet wide. On-street parking is not allowed on either side of the street, and there is a bike lane on the east side of the street between Ramon Road and Via Firenza. Sidewalks exist on most of the segment except for undeveloped areas.

There is one (1) signalized intersection and an all-way stop. There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

Da Vall Drive, between Ramon Road and Dinah Shore Drive, is a north-south two (2) to five (5) lane divided highway with a median, double yellow striping, and left turn lanes. The studied segment is approximately 5,280 feet long and varies from 37 feet to 74 feet in width. On-street parking is not allowed, and there are no bike lanes on either side of the street. Sidewalks exist throughout this road segment except for some undeveloped areas. There are two (2) signalized intersections. The surrounding land uses include residential areas and vacant lots. There are 50 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

Da Vall Drive, between Gerald Ford Drive and South City Limits, is a north-south two (2) to five (5) lane divided highway with a median, double yellow striping, and left turn lanes. The studied segment is approximately 2,600 feet long and varies from 63 feet to 80 feet in width. On-street parking is not allowed, and there are no bike lanes on either side of the street, except for the segment between Sunny Lane and Gerald Ford Drive in the northbound direction. Sidewalks exist throughout this road segment except for some undeveloped areas. There is one (1) signalized intersection. The surrounding land uses include residential areas and vacant lots.

There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Da Vall
Drive 30 th Avenue Ramon
Road 45 47 41 33 36-45 63% 0 45 85 th Percentile
Da Vall
Drive
Ramon
Road
Dinah
Shore Drive 50 45 45 40 41-50 68% 0 50 CVC 22358.6 & CA MUTCD Section 2B.13
Da Vall
Drive
Gerald Ford
Drive
South City
Limits 45 51 45 41 40-49 72% 0.12 45 CVC 22358.7 & CA
MUTCD Section 2B.13

3-17

 Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed of 47 mph indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between 30 th Avenue and Ramon Road. The speed survey conducted on January 15, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 8,394 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions.

Rounding the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment indicates a speed of 45 mph. Based on the observed conditions and 85 th percentile, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Da Vall Drive between 30 th Avenue and Ramon Road to remain 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 51 indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between Ramon Road and Dinah Shore Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 15, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 9,853 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions. Rounding the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment indicates a speed of 50 mph. Based on the observed conditions, pace range, and 85 th percentile, speed consistency, per the CA MUTCD Section 2B.13 and CVC 22358.6, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Da Vall Drive between Ramon Road and Dinah Shore Drive to be 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 51 indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between Gerald Ford Drive and South City Limits. The speed survey conducted on January 15, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 11,854 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision with a collision rate of 0.12 which is lower than the state’s collision rate. Given the residential land uses surrounding the segment and there are sidewalks missing for a portion of the west side of the segment, there is a need for a reduction of the 85 th percentile as there is an expected high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists. Based on the observed conditions, per the CA MUTCD Section 2B.13 and CVC 22358.7, pace range, and 85 th percentile, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Da Vall Drive between Gerald Ford Drive and South City Limits be remain 45 mph.

3-18

 Dave Kelly Road
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
Dave Kelley Road, between Date Palm Drive and Pluml ey Road, is an east-west two (2) to four (4) lane undivided local street with double yellow striping, dashed striping, and a left turn median. The studied segment is approximately 2,635 feet long and varies from 39 feet to 51 feet in width. On-street parking is allowed, and there are no bike facilities on either side of the street.

Sidewalks exist throughout this road segment except in some undeveloped areas. There is one (1) signalized intersection and one (1) stop contro l. The surrounding land uses include residential areas, the Post Office, Cathedral City Library, Cathedral City High School, and a vacant lot. There is a 35 mph speed limit sign post ed east of Date Palm Drive and a 25 mph speed limit sign posted west of Plumley

 Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed of 41 indicates a speed limit of 40 mph between Date Palm Drive and Plumley Road. The speed survey conducted on January 15, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 4,274 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 2 collisions with a collision rate of 0.64 which is lower than the state’s collision rate. Given Cathedral City Highschool fronting the segment, the surrounding land uses within the segment have the potential to generate a high concentration of bicyclists and pedestrians. Based on the observed conditions, pace range, 85 th percentile, CVC 22358.7, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Dave Kelly Road between Date Palm Drive and Plumley Road to remain 35.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Dave
Kelly
Road
Date Palm
Drive
Plumley
Road 35 41 37 33 33-42 35%

0.64 35

CVC 22358.7

3-19

 Dinah Shore Drive
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, Dinah Shore Drive is separated into three segments:
• West City Limits to Cathedral Canyon drive
• Cathedral Canyon Drive to Date Palm Drive
• Date Palm Drive to Da Vall Drive Drive

Dinah Shore Drive between West City Limits and Cath edral Canyon Drive is an east-west four (4) lane divided roadway with a raised median. The segment studied is approximately 5,824 feet long. On street parking is not allowed and there ar e no bike facilities throughout the segment.

There are four (4) uncontrolled T-intersections at Pueblo Trail, Navajo Trail, Sky Blue Water Trail, and Whispering Palms Trail. Sidewalks exist throughout the entire segment on both sides.

The surrounding land uses are residential. There are 45 mph signs posted throughout the street segment.

Dinah Shore Drive between Cathedral Canyon Drive an d Date Palm Drive is an east-west four (4)–five (5) divided roadway with a raised median. The studied segment is approximately 2,662 feet long. On street parking is not allowed, there are no bike facilities, and there are sidewalks on both sides throughout the segment. There are fou r (4) one way stop T-intersections at Wishing Well Trail, Via Altamira, Via De Anza, and Via Echo. There is one (1) private driveway and one (1) commercial driveway and there is one (1 ) pedestrian crossing. The surrounding land uses are Residential, Cathedral City Marketpla ce, Walgreens, Calvary Christian Center, and KGX Broadcast Center. There are 45 mph speed li mit signs posted within the road segment.

Dinah Shore Drive between Date Palm Drive and Da Va ll Drive is an east-west four (4) lane divided roadway with a raised median. The studied s egment is approximately 2,292 feet long.

On street parking is not allowed on either side, bi ke facilities are available between Plumley Road and Da Vall Drive. Sidewalk is available on bo th sides between Dinah Shore Drive and Plumley Road, while between Plumley Road and Da Val l Drive sidewalk is only available on the southern side. There are five (5) one way stop T-in tersections at Edge Canyon Drive, Corregidor Drive, Vaquero Road, Rebecca Way, and De nise Way. There is one signalized Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Dinah
Shore
Drive
West City
Limits
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
45 47 42 37 37-46 72 0.31 45 85 th Percentile Speed
Dinah
Shore
Drive
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
Date Palm
Drive 45 45 40 36 36-45 79 0.76 45 85 th Percentile Speed Dinah
Shore
Drive
Date Palm
Drive Da Vall Drive 50 50 46 43 43-52 83 0.09 50 85 th Percentile Speed

3-20

intersection at Plumley Road and there is one pedes trian crossing The surrounding land uses are Big League Dreams Cathedral City, Cathedral Cit y Highschool, Rancho Mirage Resort, Mountain View Plaza, and Apostolic Assembly of Fait h. There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.
 Recommendations
The 85 th percentile speed of 47 mph indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between West City Limits and Cathedral Canyon Drive. The speed survey conduc ted on January 15 th , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 23,294 vehicles per da y within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 6 collisions within the segment with a collisi on rate of 0.31, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. Based on the observed conditions an d the 85 th percentile speed, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Dinah Sh ore Drive between West City Limits and Cathedral Canyon Drive remain 45 mph.

The 85
th percentile speed of 45 mph indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between Cathedral Canyon Drive and Date Palm Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 15 th , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 23,420 vehi cles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 13 collisions within this segment with a collision rate of 0.76, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. Based on the existin g conditions and the 85 th percentile speed, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Dinah Shore between Cathedral Canyon Drive and Date Palm Drive remain 45 mph.

The 85th percentile speed of 50 mph indicates a spe ed limit of 50 mph between Date Palm Drive and Da Vall Drive. The speed survey was condu cted on January 15 th , 2025, determined
the average daily traffic of 23,116 vehicles per da y within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 3 collisions within this segment with a collis ion rate of 0.09, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. Based on the existing conditions an d the 85 th percentile speed, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Dinah Sh ore between Drive between Date Palm Drive and Da Vall Drive to be 50 mph.

3-21

 East Palm Canyon Drive
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, East Palm Canyon Drive is separated into four segments:
• Golf Club Drive to Perez Road
• Perez Road to Cathedral Canyon Drive
• Cathedral Canyon Drive to Date Palm Drive
• Date Palm Drive to East City Limits

East Palm Canyon Drive, between Golf Club Drive and Perez Road, is a five (5) lane divided roadway with a two-way left turn median. The studie d segment is approximately 4,050 feet long and 83 feet wide. On-street parking is not allowed, and there are no bike facilities, except for a southbound bike lane from Canyon Plaza to Perez Roa d. Sidewalks are present on both sides throughout the segment. There are four (4) intersec tions along the segment. The surrounding land uses include commercial areas such as Canyon P laza, Cathedral City Auto Center, and Cathedral City Plaza. There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted along the road segment.

East Palm Canyon Drive, between Perez Road and Cathedral Canyon Drive, is an east-west six (6) lane highway with median striping, medians, and left turn lanes. The studied segment is approximately 3,090 feet long and varies from 93 fe et to 104 feet in width. On-street parking is allowed only in some areas, and there are no bike f acilities on either side of the street.

Sidewalks exist throughout the road segment. There are four (4) intersections along the segment. The surrounding land uses are mainly comme rcial areas with Cathedral City Auto Center, Cathedral City Plaza, and vacant lots. There are 40 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

East Palm Canyon Drive, between Cathedral Canyon Dr ive and Date Palm Drive, is an east- west five (5) to six (6) lane highway with medians and left turn lanes. The studied segment is approximately 2,840 feet long and varies from 71 fe et to 100 feet in width. On-street parking is Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
East Palm
Canyon
Drive
Golf Club
Drive Perez Road 45 45 40 35 36-45 70% 0.23 45 85 th Percentile East Palm
Canyon
Drive
Perez Road
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
45 48 44 38 40-49 69% 0.18 45 CVC 22358.6
East Palm
Canyon
Drive
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
Date Palm
Drive 45 42 37 32 33-42 75% 0.08 45 CVC 22358.6
East Palm
Canyon
Drive
Date Palm
Drive
East City
Limits 50 51 46 41 40-49 67% 0.09 50 85 th Percentile

3-22

available in some areas, and there are no bike faci lities on either side of the street. Sidewalks exist throughout the road segment. There are five ( 5) intersections along the segment. The surrounding land uses include commercial areas such as Agua Caliente Casino, Desert Jewelry Mart Plaza, NAPA Auto Parts, Coachella Valley Reper tory, Luchador Brewing Company, Cathedral City Festival Lawn, and vacant lots. There are 35 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

East Palm Canyon Drive, between Date Palm Drive and East City Limits, is an east-west six (6) lane highway with medians and left turn lanes. The studied segment is approximately 2,000 feet long and varies from 82 feet to 106 feet in width. On-street parking is not allowed, and there are no bike facilities on either side of the street. Si dewalks exist throughout the road segment except in some undeveloped areas. There are three ( 3) intersections along the segment. The surrounding land uses include Palm Springs Ford, Ca thedral Gateway, and vacant lots. There are 40 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.  Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed of 45 mph indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between Golf Club Drive and Perez Road. The speed survey conducted on Janua ry 23 rd , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 38,615 vehicles per day within thi s segment. Within 4 years, there were 10 collisions within the segment with a collision rate of 0.23, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. Based on the observed conditions and per the 85 th percentile, it is recommended that the East Palm Canyon Drive segment between Golf Club Dr ive and Perez Road remain at the posted speed limit of 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 48 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between Perez Road and Cathedral Canyon Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 23 rd , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 32,292 vehicles per day wi thin this segment. Within 4 years there were 5 collisions within the segment with a collision rate of 0.18, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. Rounding down the 85 th percentile to the nearest 5 mph indicates a speed limit of 45 mph.

Based on the 85 th percentile rounded down per CVC 22358.6, it is rec ommended that the existing speed limit on East Palm Canyon Drive betw een Perez Road and Cathedral Canyon Drive remain at the posted speed limit of 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 42 mph indicates a speed limit of 40 mph between Cathedral Canyon Drive and Date Palm Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 23 rd , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 32,445 vehicles per day within this road segment. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision, with a collision rate of 0.08, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. Based on CVC 22358.6, and for lane consistenc y due to nearby speed limits, it is recommended to have East Palm Canyon Drive between Cathedral Canyon Drive and Date Palm Drive to remain 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 51 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between Date Palm Drive and East City Limits. There are approximately 40,956 vehicles per day within this road segment.

The speed survey was conducted on January 23 rd , 2025. Within 4 years, there were 2 collisions with a collision rate of 0.09, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. Based on the observed conditions and per the 85 th percentile, it is recommended that the posted spee d limit on East Palm Canyon Drive between Date Palm Drive to East City Limits remain at 50 mph.

3-23

 Edom Hill Road
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
Edom Hill Road between Varner Road and Burrtec Reco very & Transfer is an east-west two (2) lane divided roadway with double yellow line stripi ng. The segment studied is approximately 8,816 feet long with curb-to-curb width 34 feet wid e. On street parking is not allowed and there is no bike facilities throughout the segment. There are no sidewalks throughout the segment.

There is one (1) three way stop intersection throug hout the roadway segment. The surrounding land uses is a business recycling facility. There a re 40 mph posted signs posted throughout the street segment.
 Recommendations
The 85 th percentile speed 47 mph indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between Varner Road and Burrtec Transfer Station. The speed survey conducte d on January 14 th , 2025, vehicles per day determined an average daily traffic of 2,175 vehicl es per day within this road segment. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions. Based on the pace r ange, median speed, and CVC 22358.8, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Edom Hill Road between Varner Road and Burrtec Transfer Station to remain 40 mph.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Edom
Hill Road
Varner
Road
Burrtec
Recovery &
Transfer
40 47 41 34 38-47 60% 0 40 CVC 22358.8

3-24

 Gerald Ford Drive
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, Gerald Ford Drive is separated into two segments:
• Date Palm Drive to Plumley Road
• Plumley Road to Da Vall Drive

Gerald Ford Drive between Date Palm Drive and Pluml ey Road is a east-west is a four (4) lane roadway divided with a two way left turn median. Th e studied segment is approximately 2,650 feet long with a curb-to-curb width of 75 feet. On street parking is not allowed on both sides of the street throughout the segment. There are bike f acilities and sidewalks present on both sides of the street segment. There are two (2) signalized intersections throughout the segment. The surrounding land uses are a U.S. Bank. There are 50 speed limit signs posted on both sides of the segment.

Gerald Ford Drive between Plumley Road and Da Vall Drive is an east-west four (4) lane roadway divided with a two way left turn medians an d a raised median. The studied segment is approximately 2,630 feet long with a curb-to-curb w idth of 75 feet. On street parking is not allowed on both sides of the street segment. There are bike facilities and sidewalks on both sides of the segment. There are two (2) signalized intersections throughout the segment. The surrounding land uses are residential. There are 50 speed limit signs posted on both sides on the ends of the segment.

 Recommendations
The 85th-percentile speed 50 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between Date Palm Drive and Plumley Road. There are approximately 11,861 ve hicles per day within this road segment.

The speed survey was conducted on January 15 th , 2025. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision within the road segment with a collision rate of 0. 12, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. Based on the 85 th percentile speed, it is recommended that the poste d speed limit on Gerald Ford Drive between Plumley Road and Date Palm Drive remain at 50 mph.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Gerald
Ford
Drive
Date Palm
Drive
Plumley
Road 50 50 45 40 41-50 72% 0.12 50 85 th Percentile
Gerald
Ford
Drive
Plumley
Road
Da Vall
Drive 50 50 46 43 42-51 83% 0 50 85 th Percentile

3-25

The 85
th -percentile speed 50 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between Plumley Road and Da Valle Drive. There are approximately 13,716 vehi cles per day within this road segment. The speed survey was conducted on January 15 th , 2025. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions within the road segment. Based on the 85 th percentile speed, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Gerlad Ford Drive between Plumley Road and Da Valle Road remain at 50 mph.

3-26

 Landau Boulevard
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, Landau Boulevard is separated into five segments:
• Verona Road to Vista Chino Drive
• Vista Chino Drive to Tachevah Drive
• Tachevah Drive to 30 th Avenue
• 30 th Avenue to McCallum Way
• McCallum Way to Ramon Road
Landau Boulevard between Verona Road to Vista Chino is a north-south roadway with a three (3) lane divided roadway segment with a two way lef t turn median. The studied segment is approximately 2,605 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 70 feet. On-street parking is not allowed on both sides of the segment and there are no bike facilities throughout the segment. Sidewalks are only on the west side of the segment. There is one (1) signalized intersection and one (1) three-way stop intersection throughout the segment. The surrounding land uses are Plaza Rio Vista, Vista Chino Village, Bible Baptist Church of Cathedral City, Senior Community, a Fire Station, and residential areas. There are 45 mph sp eed limit signs posted on both ends of the street segment.

Landau Boulevard between Vista Chino and Tachevah D rive is a north-south three (3) to four (4) lane divided roadway segment with a two way lef t turn median. The studied segment is approximately 2,630 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 70 feet. On-street parking is allowed on the east side of the segment and bike lane faciliti es are located throughout the segment. There is one (1) signalized intersection throughout the s egment. The surrounding land uses are residential, Double Tree by Hilton Hotel Golf Resor t, and the Desert Princess Country Club.

There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted throughout the street segment.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Landau
Boulevard
Verona
Road
Vista Chino
Drive 45 46 39 33 33-42 61% 0.59 45 85 th Percentile
Landau
Boulevard
Vista Chino
Drive
Tachevah
Drive 45 52 47 43 43-52 71% 0.10 45 CVC 22358.7
Landau
Boulevard
Tachevah
Drive
30 th
Avenue 45 50 46 41 41-50 75% 0.10 45 CVC 22358.7
Landau
Boulevard 30 th Avenue McCallum
Way 45 52 46 41 40-49 73% 0.35 45 CVC 22358.7
Landau
Boulevard
McCallum
Way
Ramon
Road 45 51 44 40 40-49 70% 0.73 45 CVC 22358.7

3-27

Landau Boulevard between Tachevah Drive to 30
th Avenue is a north-south four (4) lane divided
roadway segment with a two way left turn median. Th e studied segment is approximately 2,620 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 70 feet. On-st reet parking is allowed on the east side of the segment and bike lane facilities are located throughout the segment. There is one (1) signalized intersection throughout the segment. The surroundin g land uses are residential. There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted throughout the segment.

Landau Boulevard between 30
th Avenue and McCallum Way is a north-south four (4) lane divided roadway segment with a two way left turn me dian. The studied segment is approximately 2,660 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 70 feet. On-street parking is allowed on the east side of the segment and bike lane faciliti es are located throughout the segment. There is one (1) signalized intersection throughout the s egment. The surrounding land uses are residential, Mt San Jacinto High School, Veteran's Village of Cathedral City, The Salvation Army, and Landu Elementary School. There are 25 mph and 45 mph speed limit signs posted throughout the street segment.

Landau Boulevard between McCallum Way and Ramon Roa d is a north south four (4) lane divided roadway segment with a two way left turn me dian. The studied segment is approximately 2,625 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 70 feet. On street parking is allowed on the east side of the segment and bike facilities ar e located throughout the segment. There is one (1) signalized intersection throughout the segm ent. The surrounding land uses are residential and Ramon Plaza. There are 25 mph, and 45 mph speed limits posted throughout the street segment.

 Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed of 46 mph indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between Verona Road and Vista Chino. There are approximately 4,702 vehicles per day within this road segment. The speed survey was conducted on January 22 nd , 2025. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision within a collision rate of 0.59, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. Based on the observed conditions and the 85 th percentile speed it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Landau Boulevard between Verona Road and Vista Chino remain 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 52 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between Vista Chino Drive and Tachevah Drive. There are approximately 13,922 vehicles per day within this road segment. The speed survey was conducted on January 22 nd , 2025. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision within a collision rate of 0.10, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. In accordance with CVC 22358.7, the surrounding land facilities of bike lanes and sidewalks have the potential to generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians. Based on the existing conditions and per CVC 22358.7, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Landau Boulevard between Vista Chino and Tachevah Drive remain 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 50 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between Tachevah Drive and 30 th Avenue. The speed survey conducted on January 22 nd , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 14,375 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision within the segment with a collision rate of 0.10, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. In accordance with CVC 22358.7, the surrounding land facilities of bike lanes and sidewalks have the potential to generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians. Based on the existing conditions and CVC 22358.7, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Landau Boulevard between Tachevah Drive and 30 th Avenue remain 45 mph.

3-28

The 85
th -percentile speed of 52 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between 30 th Avenue and McCallum Way. The speed survey conducted on January 22 nd , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 19,429 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 5 collisions with a collision rate of 0.35, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. In accordance with CVC 22358.7, the surrounding land uses, bike lanes, and sidewalks have the potential to generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians. Based on CVC 22358.7 and the pace range, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Landau Boulevard between 30 th Avenue and McCallum Way remain 45 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 51 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between McCallum Way and Ramon Road. The speed survey conducted on January 22 nd , 2025, determined an average daily traffic of 13,183 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 7 collisions with a collision rate of 0.73, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. In accordance with CVC 22358.7, the surrounding land uses, bike lanes, and sidewalks have the potential to generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians. Based on CVC 22358.7 and the pace range, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Landau Boulevard between McCallum Way and Ramon Road remain 45 mph.

3-29

 McCallum Way
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, Dinah Shore Drive is separated into four segments:
• Landau Boulevard to Avenida Maravilla
• Avenida Maravilla to Date Palm Drive
• Date Palm Drive to Santoro Drive
• Santoro Drive to Da Vall Drive
McCallum Way between Landau Boulevard and Avenida Maravilla is an east-west two (2) lane divided roadway segment with yellow centerline striping. The studied segment is approximately 2,650 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 40 feet wide. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the segment and there is sidewalk along the segment. There are no bike facilities throughout the segment. There are two (2) all-way stop intersections and one (1) two-way stop intersection within the segment. The surrounding land uses are Mt San Jacinto High School and residential. There are 25 mph and 30 mph speed limits posted throughout the segment.

McCallum Way between Avenida Maravilla and Date Palm Drive is an east-west two (2) lane divided roadway segment with dashed yellow centerline striping. The studied segment is approximately 2,660 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 40 feet. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the segment and there is sidewalk along the segment. There are two (2) all way stop intersections and one (1) signalized intersection through the segment. The surrounding land uses are Date Palm Plaza and residential. There are 25 mph speed limit signs posted along the segment.

McCallum Way between Date Palm Drive and Santoro Drive is an east-west two (2) lane undivided and divided roadway segment with dashed yellow centerline striping. The segment is 2,660 feet long with a curb-to-curb width of 40 feet. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the street and there is sidewalk along the segment. There are two (2) all-way stop intersections and one (1) signalized intersection throughout the segment. The surrounding land uses are Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
McCallum
Way
Landau
Boulevard
Avenida
Maravilla 25 33 29 25 24-33 80% 0 25 Residential District McCallum
Way
Avenida
Maravilla
Date Palm
Drive 25 35 31 26 27-36 77% 0.53 25 CVC 22358.7
McCallum
Way
Date Palm
Drive
Santoro
Drive 30 32 29 25 25-34 84% 0.31 25
85 th Percentile Speed
CVC 22358.6
Residential District
McCallum
Way
Santoro
Drive
Da Vall
Drive 30 36 32 25 27-36 70% 0 25 Residential District

3-30

residential, First School Pre-School Childcare, Sunny Sands Elementary School, and Dollar Tree. There are 25 mph speed limit signs posted throughout the street segment.

McCallum Way between Santoro Drive and Da Vall Drive is an east-west two (2) lane divided roadway segment with dashed yellow centerline striping from Santoro Drive and Walden Way and between Walden Way and Da Valle Drive is an undivided roadway. The segment is 2,646 feet long with a curb-to-curb width between 30 to 40 feet. On street parking is allowed on both sides of the segment and there is sidewalk along the north side; however, the south side of the segment has sidewalk that ends about 1,320 feet before Da Valle Drive. There are two (2) all way stops, one (1) three-way stop, and one (1) two way stop intersections throughout the segment. The surrounding land uses are residential. There are 30 mph, and 35 mph speed limit signs posted along the street segment.
 Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed of 33 mph indicates a speed limit of 30 mph between Landau Boulevard and Avenida Maravilla. The speed survey conducted on January 15 th , 2025, determined an average daily traffic of 2,581 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions. Based on the observed conditions the segment qualifies as a residential district with more than 13 houses within a quarter mile fronting the street. It is recommended that the posted speed limit on McCallum Way between Landau Boulevard and Avenida Maravilla remain 25 mph.

The 85th percentile speed of 35 mph indicates a speed limit of 35 mph between Avenida Maravilla and Data Palm Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 15 th , 2025, determined
an average daily traffic of 5,157 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 2 collisions with a collision rate of 0.53, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. In accordance with CVC 22358.7, the surrounding land uses and sidewalks have the potential to generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, reducing the speed limit. Based on CVC 22358.7, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on McCallum Way between Avenida Maravilla and Date Palm Drive to be 30 mph.

The 85th percentile speed of 32 mph indicates a speed limit of 30 mph between Date Palm Drive and Santoro Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 15 th , 2025, determined the
average daily traffic of 5,157 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision within the segment with a collision rate of 0.31, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. This segment qualifies as a residential district with more than 13 houses within a quarter mile fronting the street. Based on the existing conditions and the segment being a residential district, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on McCallum Way between Date Palm Drive and Santoro Drive to be 25 mph.

The 85th percentile speed of 36 mph indicates a speed limit of 35 mph between Santoro Drive and Da Vall Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 15 th , 2025, determined the average
daily traffic of 2,666 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions. This segment qualifies as a residential district with more than 13 houses within a quarter mile fronting the street. Based on the existing conditions and the segment being a residential district, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on McCallum Way between Santoro Drive and Da Vall Drive to be 25 mph.

3-31

 Mountain View Road
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
Mountain View Road between Varner Road and North Ci ty Limits is a north south two (2) lane divided roadway segment with double yellow centerli ne striping. The studied segment is approximately 1,340 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 26 feet. There is no on street parking or sidewalk along the segment. There is one (1) three way stop intersection throughout the segment. There are no surrounding land uses along t he segment. There are no posted speed limit signs along the segment.

 Recommendations
The 85th-percentile speed of 54 mph indicates a spe ed limit of 55 mph between Varner Road and North City Limits. The speed survey was conduct ed on January 15 th , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 13,271 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions. Rounding down the 85 th percentile to the nearest 5 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph. Based on the existing conditions, the 85 th percentile speed rounded down per CVC 22358.6, and the pace range, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Mountain View Road between Varner Road and North City Limits to be 50 mph.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Mountain
View Road
Varner
Road
North City
Limits 55 54 50 44 45-54 73% 0 50 CVC 22358.6

3-32

 Palm Drive
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
Palm Drive between Interstate 10 and Varner Road is a north-south four (4) to five (5) lane divided roadway segment with a striped median and a raised median. The studied segment is approximately 4,455 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 85 feet. Bike facilities are located on both sides of the segment. There are three (3) signalized intersections throughout the street segment. The surrounding land uses are Jack in the Box, Chevron Gasoline, and ARCO Gasoline. There are 60 mph speed limit signs posted throughout the street segment.  Recommendations
The 85th-percentile speed of 61 mph indicates a speed limit of 60 mph between Varner Road and Interstate 10. The speed survey conducted on January 15 th , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 30,564 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 2 collisions with a collision rate of 0.05, which is lower than the State Collison Rate. Based on the existing conditions, the 85 th percentile, and the pace range of 49 to 58 mph, it is recommended that the speed limit on Palm Drive between Interstate 10 and Varner Road to be reduced to 55 mph.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Palm Drive Interstate
10 Varner
Road 60 61 55 49 49-58 62% 0.05 55 85 th Percentile & Pace Range

3-33

 Perez Road
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, Perez Road is separated into two segments:
• East Palm Canyon Drive to Cathedral Canyon Drive
• Cathedral Canyon Drive to Date Palm Drive
Perez Road between East Palm Canyon Drive and Cathedral Canyon Drive is an east-west four (4) lane divided roadway segment with a striped med ian. The studied segment is approximately 3,040 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 64 to 77 feet. On-street parking is allowed from Campbell Street to Cathedral Canyon Drive. Sidewalk s are located throughout the entire segment and there are no bike facilities. There are two (2) signalized intersections and two (2) signalized pedestrian crossings along the segment. The surrounding land uses are G.H Pools Supplies, Automobile business services, Palm Springs Nissan, Palm Springs Kia, Toyota of The Desert, Acura of The Desert, Honda of the Desert, a nd Tesla Car Dealer. There are 40 mph speed limit signs posted throughout the street segment.

Perez Road between Cathedral Canyon Drive and Date Palm Drive an east-west four (4) lane divided roadway segment with a striped median. The studied segment is approximately 3,022 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 76 feet. On street parking is allowed on some portions of the street and there are no bike facilities. There are two (2) signalized intersections throughout the segment. The surrounding land uses are Vista Point Plaza, Perez Art & Design, Perez Plaza, Perez Business Park, Caillas Funeral Home, Pajaro B usiness Park, and other businesses.

There are 40 mph speed limit signs posed throughout the street segment.

 Recommendations
The 85th-percentile speed of 43 mph indicates a speed limit of 40 mph between East Palm Drive and Cathedral Canyon Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 22 nd , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 7,951 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision within the segment with a collision rate of 0.15, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. Based on the existing conditions and the 85 th percentile speed and the Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Perez Road
East Palm
Canyon
Drive
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
40 43 39 33 34-43 72% 0.15 40 85 th Percentile Speed
Perez Road
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
Date Palm
Drive 40 45 40 36 35-44 74% 0.55 40 CVC 22358.7

3-34

pace range, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Perez Road between East Palm Drive and Cathedral Canyon Drive remain 40 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 45 mph indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between Cathedral Canyon Drive and Date Palm Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 22 nd , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 10,881 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 5 collisions within this segment with a collision rate of 0.55, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. In accordance with CVC 22358.7, the surrounding land uses and sidewalks are expected to generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians. Rounding the 85 th percentile to the nearest 5 mph, and with an additional 5 mph reduction, indicates a speed limit of 40 mph. Based on the existing conditions and CVC 22358.7, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Perez Road between Cathedral Canyon Drive and Date Palm Drive to remain 40 mph.

3-35

 Plumley Road
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, Plumley Road is separated into three segments:
• Dave Kelly Road to Dinah Shore Drive
• Dinah Shore Drive to 35 th Avenue
• 35 th Avenue to Gerald Ford Drive
Plumley Road between Dave Kelly Road and Dinah Shore Drive is a north to south two (2) lane divided roadway with dashed yellow centerline striping. The studied segment is approximately 1,315 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 35 feet. On street parking is not allowed on both sides of the segment and there are no bike facilities. Sidewalks are only on the west side of the segment. There is one (1) signalized intersection throughout the segment. There are 25 mph and 35 mph speed limit signs posted throughout the segment.

Plumley Road between Dinah Shore Drive and 35
th Avenue is a north to south two (2) lane
divided roadway with a double yellow centerline striping. The studied segment is approximately 2,640 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 40 feet. On street parking is allowed on both sides of the segment and sidewalks are also on both sides of the segment. There are no bike facilities throughout the segment. There is one (1) signalized intersection and two (2) all way stops along the street segment. The surrounding land uses include Nellie N. Coffman Middle School and residential neighborhoods. There are 25 mph and 35 mph speed limit signs posted throughout the segment.

Plumley Road between 35
th Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive is a north to south two (2) lane divided roadway with a double yellow centerline striping. The studied segment is approximately 2,638 feet long with a curb-to-curb width of 40 feet. On street parking is allowed on the west side of the segment from 35 th Avenue to Converse Road. There are sidewalks on both sides of the segment and there are no bike facilities. The surrounding land uses are residential neighborhoods. There are 35 mph speed limit signs posted throughout the segment.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Plumley
Road
Dave Kelly
Road
Dinah
Shore Drive 35 37 32 26 28-37 69% 0 35 85 th Percentile Speed Plumley
Road
Dinah
Shore Drive
35 th
Avenue 35 36 31 26 27-36 72% 0.46 35 85 th Percentile Speed Plumley
Road 35 th Avenue Gerald
Ford Drive 35 40 35 30 30-39 73% 0.50 35 CVC 22358.7

3-36

 Recommendations
The 85th-percentile speed of 37 mph indicates a speed limit of 35 mph between Dave Kelly Road and Dinah Shore Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 15 th , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 3,510 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions within the segment. Based on the 85 th percentile speed and the pace range, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Plumley Road between Dave Kelly Road and Dinah Shore Drive remain 35 mph.

The 85th percentile speed of 36 mph indicates a speed limit of 35 mph between Dinah Shore Drive and 35
th Avenue. The speed survey conducted on January 15 th , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 2,967 vehicles per day within the segment. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision within the segment with a collision rate of 0.46, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. Based on the observed conditions and the 85 th percentile speed, it is recommended that the speed limit on Plumley Road between Dinah Shpre Drive and 35 th Avenue remain 35 mph.

The 85th percentile speed of 40 mph indicates a speed limit of 40 mph between 35 th Avenue
and Gerald Ford Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 15 th , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 2,967 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision within the segment with a collision rate of 0.46, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. Per CVC 22358.7, the surrounding land uses and two schools being nearby, there is expected to be a high concentration of pedestrians and bikes. Rounding the 85th to the nearest 5 mph and with an additional five mph reduction, indicates a speed limit of 35 mph. Based on the existing conditions, CVC 22358.7, and the pace range, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Plumley Road between 35 th Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive remain to 35 mph.

3-37

 Ramon Road
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, Ramon Road is separated into five segments:
• San Luis Rey Drive to Landau Boulevard
• Landau Boulevard to Cathedral Canyon Drive
• Cathedral Canyon Drive and Date Palm Drive
• Date Palm Drive to Neuma Drive
• Neuma Drive to Da Vall Drive
Ramon Road between San Luis Rey Drive and Landau Bo ulevard is an east to west four (4) lane divided roadway segment with a raised median f rom Lawerence Crossway Road to San Luis Rey Drive and a double yellow centerline strip ing from Lawarence Crossway Road to Landau Boulevard. The studied segment is approximat ely 3,930 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 60 feet to 80 feet. On-street parking is n ot allowed and there are no bike facilities throughout the segment. There are three (3) signali zed intersections throughout the segment.

The surrounding land uses are Destination Ramon Pla za, Starrs Auto Repair, Green Clean Express Wash, Income Tax, Royal Computers, Villa Ba kery Mexican Food, 7-Eleven Convenience Store, Devon Self Storage, and other retail plazas. There are 40 mph and 45 mph speed limit signs posted throughout the street segment.

Ramon Road between Landau Boulevard and Cathedral C anyon Drive is an east west six (6) lane divided roadway segment with a raised median. The studied segment is approximately 2,660 feet long with a curb-to-curb width of 86 fee t. On street parking is not permitted and there are no bike facilities along the segment. There are three (3) signalized intersections and one (1) Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Ramon
Road
San Luis
Rey Drive
Landau
Boulevard 45 50 44 38 39-48 66% 0.09 45 CVC 22358.7
Ramon
Road
Landau
Boulevard
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
40 44 39 35 35-44 76% 0.26 40 85 th Percentile Speed
Rounded Down
Ramon
Road
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
Date Palm
Drive 40 46 41 35 38-47 72% 0 40 CVC 22358.7
Ramon
Road
Date Palm
Drive
Neuma
Drive 50 47 43 37 38-47 71% 0.11 45 85 th Percentile
Ramon
Road
Neuma
Drive
Da Vall
Drive 50 53 49 42 45-54 70% 0.08 45 CVC 22358.7

3-38

pedestrian crossing throughout the street segment. The surrounding land uses are 76 Convenience Shop, Auto Services business plazas, Ca rniceria Rancho Grande Supermarket, Circle K Liquor, Retail Plaza, Ramon Plaza, UHAUL, Outpost Market, Safer Plaza, Palm Mirror and Glass, Foam Roofing Experts, Big O Tires, and T oro Loco. There are 40 mph speed limit signs posted on the street segment.

Ramon Road between Cathedral Canton Drive and Date Palm Drive is an east west six (6) lane divided roadway segment with raised medians. The st udied segment is approximately 2,660 feet long with a curb-to-curb width of 86 feet. On street parking is not permitted and there are no existing bike facilities along the segment. The sur rounding land uses are Gentry Plaza, Ramon Plaza, 76 Gasoline Convenience Stores, ARCO, Circle K, Quick Tax, Southwest Dental, Auto Repair Shops, Muro & Muro Law Offices, and Weinersc hnitzel. There are 40 mph speed limit signs posted along the street segment.

Ramon Road between Date Palm Drive and Neuma Drive is an east west six (6) lane divided roadway segment with raised medians. The studied se gment is approximately 2,060 feet long with curb to curb width of 86 feet to 90 feet wide. On-street parking is not permitted and there are no bike facilities along the segment. There are three (3) signalized intersections along the segment. The surrounding land uses are Date Palm Ce ntre, Cathedral Village, Pure Dental, Desert Dental Alternatives. There are 50 mph speed limit signs posted along the segment.

Ramon Road between Neuma Drive and Da Vall Drive is an east west six (6) lane divided roadway segment with raised medians. The studied se gment is approximately 3,230 feet long with curb-to-curb width of 86 feet. On-street parki ng is not allowed and there are no bike facilities along the segment. There are two (2) sig nalized intersections along the segment. The surrounding land uses are Desert Memorial Park, Can yon Springs Department of Devlopmental Services, Forest Lawn Memorial Parks and Mortuaries , Chuck's Automotive Services. Ther are 50 mph speed limit signs posted along the segment.

 Recommendations
The 85th-percentile speed of 50 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between San Luis Rey Drive and Landau Boulevard. The speed survey conducted on February 4 th , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 3,930 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 4 collisions within this segment with a collision rate of 0.09, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. In accordance with CVC 22358.7 the surrounding land uses, intersections, and sidewalks have the potential to generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians.

Based on the observed conditions, CVC 22358.7, and the pace range, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Ramon Road between San Luis Rey Drive and Landau Boulevard remain 45 mph.

The 85
th percentile speed of 44 mph indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between Landau Boulevard and Cathedral Canyon Drive. The speed survey conducted on February 4 th , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 37,320 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 7 collisions within this segment with a collision rate of 0.26, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. Rounding down the 85th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph, per CVC 22358.6, indicates a speed limit of 40 mph. Based on the 85 th percentile speed, CVC 22358.6, and the pace range, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Ramon Road between Landau Boulevard and Cathedral Canyon Drive remain 40 mph.

3-39

The 85th percentile speed of 46 mph indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between Cathedral Canyon Drive and Date Palm Drive. The speed survey conducted on February 4 th , 2025,
determined the average daily traffic of 34,164 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years there were 0 collisions within this segment. In accordance with CVC 22358.7, the surrounding land uses within the segment have the potential to generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians. Rounding the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph with an additional 5 mph reduction indicates a speed limit of 40 mph. Based on the 85 th percentile speed and CVC 22358.7, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Ramon Road between Cathedral Canyon Drive and Date Palm Drive remain 40 mph.

The 85th percentile speed of 47 mph indicates a speed limit of 45 mph between Date Palm Drive and Neuma Drive. The speed survey conducted on February 4 th , 2025, determined the
average daily traffic of 30,617 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 2 collisions within the segment with a collision rate of 0.11, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. Based on the 85 th percentile speed and the pace range, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Ramon Road between Date Palm Drive and Neuma Drive be 45 mph.

The 85
th percentile speed of 53 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between Neuma Drive and Da Vall Drive. The speed survey conducted on February 4 th , 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 1,142 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 2 collisions within the segment with a collision rate of 0.08, which is lower than the State Collision Rate. In accordance with CVC 22358.7, the surrounding land uses within the segment have the potential to generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians. Rounding the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph with an additional reduction of 5 mph indicates a speed limit of 45 mph. Based on the 85 th percentile speed and CVC 22358.7, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Ramon Road between Neuma Drive and Da Vall Drive be 45 mph.

3-40

 San Antonio Drive
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
San Antonio Drive between San Mateo Drive and Missi on Drive is a north south two (2) lane undivided roadway segment. The studied segment is approximately 3,430 feet long with curb-to- curb width of 34 feet. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the street segment and there are no existing bike lanes. There are two (2) three -way intersections and one (1) all-way stop intersections. The surrounding land uses are reside ntial neighborhoods. There are 25 mph speed limit signs posted throughout the segment.

 Recommendations
The 85th-percentile speed of 33 mph indicates a speed limit of 30 mph between San Mateo Drive and Mission Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 22nd, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 1,142 vehicles per day, within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 3 collisions with a collision rate of 2.78, which is higher than the State Collision Rate. Based on the existing conditions, the 85 th percentile speed, and the high collision rate, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on San Antonio Drive between San Mateo Drive and Mission Drive to remain 25 mph.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
San
Antonio
Drive
San Mateo
Drive
Mission
Drive 25 33 27 20 23-32 61% 2.78 25 85 th Percentile & High Collision Rate

3-41

 Santoro Drive
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
Santoro Drive between 30 th Avenue to McCallum Way is a north-south roadway wi th two (2) lane divided roadway segment with yellow centerline striping. The studied segment is 2,646 feet long with a curb-to-curb width of 52 feet. On stree t parking is not allowed, there are no bike facilities, and there are sidewalks on both sides t hroughout the segment. There are two all-way stop intersections. The surrounding land uses are residential and vacant lots. There are 25 mph speed limit signs posted within the segment.

 Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed of 42 mph indicates a speed limit of 40 mph between 30 th Avenue and McCallum Way. The speed survey conducted on January 15, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 2,344 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions. Given the surrounding land uses and James Workman Middle School being nearby, there is a potential for a high concentration of bicyclists and pedestrians. Based on the observed conditions, 85 th percentile, and CVC 22358.7, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Santoro Drive between 30 th Avenue and McCallum Way to be 35 mph.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Santoro
Drive 30 th Avenue McCallum
Way 25 42 36 31 33-42 67% 0 35 CVC 22358.7

3-42

 San Luis Rey Drive
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
San Luis Rey Drive between Mission Drive to Ramon D rive is a north-south two (2)-three (3) lane divided segment with a painted two-way left tu rn median. The studied segment is 1,581 feet long with a curb-to-curb width of 40-68 feet. On street is allowed on both sides, there are no bike facilities, and sidewalk exists on both sides expect for a vacant lot on the eastern side.

There is one (1) all-way stop and one (1) signalize d intersection. The surrounding land uses are The Springs Plaza, Autoshops, a Liquor Market, and vacant lots. There are 25 mph speed limit signs posted within the segment.

 Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed of 34 mph indicates a speed limit of 35 mph between Mission Drive and Ramon Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 22, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 6,091 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 2 collisions with a collision rate of 0.75 which is lower than the state’s collision rate. Rounding down the 85 th Percentile to the nearest 5mph increment per CVC 22358.6, indicates a speed of 30 mph.

Based on CVC 22358.7, the surrounding land facilities within this segment has the potential to generate a high concentration of pedestrians, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on San Luis Rey between Mission Drive and Ramon Drive to remain 25 mph.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
San Luis
Rey Drive
Mission
Drive
Ramon
Drive 25 34 31 26 25-34 78% 0.75 25
CVC 22358.7 & 85 th
Percentile Rounding
Down

3-43

 Tachevah Drive
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, Tachevah Drive is separated into two segments:
• Landau Boulevard to Avenida Maravilla
• Avenida Maravilla to Date Palm Drive
Tachevah Drive between Landau Boulevard to Avenida Maravilla is an east-west roadway with two (2) lane divided segment with double yellow cen terline striping. The studied segment is 5,011 feet long, with a curb-to-curb width of 35 fe et. On street parking is allowed on both sides, there are no bike facilities, and sidewalks exist on both sides throughout the segment. There are three (3) all-way stop Intersections and one (1) st op control intersection. The surrounding land uses are residential and Panorama Park. There are 2 5 mph speed limit signs posted within the segment.

Tachevah Drive between Avenida Maravilla to Date Pa lm Drive is an east-west roadway with two (2) lane divided segment with double yellow cen terline striping. The studied segment is 2,633 feet long, with a curb-to-curb width of 36 fe et. On street parking is allowed on both sides, there are no bike facilities, and sidewalks exist on both sides throughout the segment. There are three (3) all-way stop Intersections and one (1) st op control intersection. The surrounding land uses are residential and vacant lots. There are 25 mph speed limit signs posted within the segment.
 Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed 34 mph indicates a speed limit of 35 mph between Landau Boulevard and Avenida Maravilla. There are approximately 1,19 4 vehicles per day within this road segment. The speed survey was conducted on January 22, 2025. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision with a collision rate of 0.61, which is l ower than the state’s collision rate. Rounding the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment in dicates a speed limit of 35 mph in this segment. However, this segment qualifies as a resid ential district as there are 53 homes within a half a mile fronting the street. Based on the obs erved conditions and per CVC Division 1 Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Tachevah
Drive
Landau
Boulevard
Avenida
Maravilla 25 34 30 25 25-34 74% 0.61 25 Residential District Tachevah
Drive
Avenida
Maravilla
Date Palm
Drive 25 35 30 25 26-35 70% 0 25 Residential District

3-44

Section 515, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Tachevah Drive between Landau Boulevard and Avenida Maravilla to remain 25 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed 34 mph indicates a speed limit of 35 mph between Avenida Maravilla and Date Palm Drive. There are approximately 1,676 vehicles per day within this road segment.

The speed survey was conducted on January 22, 2025. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions.

Rounding the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment in dicates a speed limit of 35 mph in this segment. However, this segment qualifie s as a residential district as there are 62 homes within a half a mile fronting the street. Bas ed on the observed conditions and per CVC Division 1 Section 515, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Tachevah Drive between Avenida Maravilla and Date Palm Drive to remain 25 mph.

3-45

 Varner Road
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, Varner Road is separated into three segments:
• West City Limits to Edom Hill Road
• Edom Hill Road to Date Palm Drive
• Date Palm Drive to Bob Hope Drive
Varner Road between West City Limits and Edom Hill Road is an east-west two (2) lanes highway with dashed centerline striping. The studie d segment is approximately 3,100 feet long and 30 feet wide. On-street parking is not allowed and there is no bike facility on both sides of the street. There is one (1) signalized intersectio n and two (2) all-way stops. Sidewalk does not exist throughout the road segment. The surrounding land use is vacant lot. There are 55 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

Varner Road between Edom Hill Road and Date Palm Dr ive is a north-south two (2) lanes highway with dashed centerline striping and double yellow striping. The studied segment is approximately 6,440 feet long and 30 feet wide. On-street parking is not allowed and there is no bike facility on both sides of the street. There ar e two (2) all-way stops. Sidewalk does not exist throughout the road segment. The surrounding land u se is vacant lot. There are 55 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

Varner Road between Date Palm Drive and Bob Hope Drive limits is a north-south two (2) lanes highway with dashed centerline striping and double yellow striping. The studied segment is approximately 15,280 feet long and 30 feet wide. On -street parking is not allowed and there is no bike facility on both sides of the street. There is one (1) signalized intersection and one (1) all-way stop. Sidewalk does not exist throughout the road segment. The surrounding land use is vacant lot. There are 55 mph speed limit signs posted within the road segment.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Varner
Road
West City
Limits
Edom Hill
Road

55 52

48 44

44-53

82 0 50 85 th Percentile
Varner
Road
Edom Hill
Road
Date Palm
Drive

55 56

50 43

47-56

63 0.07 55 85 th Percentile
Varner
Road
Date Palm
Drive
Bob Hope
Drive

55 59

53 46

52-61

56 0.10 55 CVC 22358.6

3-46

 Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed of 52 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between West City Limits to Edom Road Hill There are approximately 13,246 ve hicles per day within this road segment.

The speed survey was conducted on January 15, 2025. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions.

Rounding the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment in dicates a speed limit of 50 mph. Based on the observed conditions and 85 th percentile, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Varner Road between West City Limits and Edom Hill Road to be 50 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 56 mph indicates a speed limit of 55 mph between Edom Hill Road to Date Palm Drive. There are approximately 16,831 vehicles per day within this road segment.

The speed survey was conducted on January 15, 2025. Within 4 years, there were 2 collisions with a collision rate of 0.07, which is lower than the state’s collision rate. Rounding the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment ind icates a speed limit of 55 mph. Based on the observed conditions and 85 th percentile, it is recommended that the posted spee d limit on Varner Road between Edom Hill Road and Date Palm Drive to remain 55 mph.

The 85th-percentile speed of 59 mph indicates a spe ed limit of 60 mph between Date Palm Drive and east City limits. There are approximately 4,801 vehicles per day within this road segment. The speed survey was conducted on January 15, 2025. Within 4 years, there were 2 collisions with a collision rate of 0.20 which is l ower than the state’s collision rate. Rounding the 85th-percentile speed down per CVC 22358.6 to the nearest 5 mph increment indicates a speed limit of 55 mph in this segment. Based on the obser ved conditions and 85th percentile and CVC 22358.6, it is recommended that the posted speed li mit on Varner Road between Date Palm Drive and east City limits to remain 55 mph.

3-47

 Vista Chino Drive
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, Vista Chino Drive is separated into four segments:
• West City Limits to Landau Boulevard
• Landau Boulevard to Avenida Maravilla
• Avenida Maravilla to Date Palm Drive
Vista Chino Drive between West City Limits to Landa u Boulevard is an east-west roadway with a four (4) lane divided segment with two-way left t urn median and double yellow centerline striping. The studied segment is 5,953 feet long, w ith a curb-to-curb width of 53-75 feet wide.

On street parking is allowed east of Carmela Dr on the northern side of the segment. There are on-street bike facilities and sidewalks on both sid es of the roadway between 994 feet west of Carmela Dr and Landau Boulevard. There are two (2) signalized intersections. The surrounding land uses are residential, Plaza Rio Vista, DoubleT ree Golf Resort. 39 residential driveways front the north side of the street. There are 55 mph speed limit signs posted within the segment.

Vista Chino Drive between Landau Boulevard to Avenida Maravilla is an east-west roadway with a four (4) lane divided segment with two-way left t urn median. The studied segment is 2,736 feet long, with a curb-to-curb width of 85 feet. On street parking, on-streets bike facilities, and sidewalks exist on both sides of the roadway. There are two (2) signalized intersections. The surrounding land uses are Vista Chino Village. 25 r esidential driveways front the south side of the street. There are 55 mph speed limit signs posted within the segment.

Vista Chino Drive between Avenida Maravilla to Date Palm Drive is an east-west roadway with a four (4) lane divided segment with two-way left tur n median and raised median. The studied segment is 2,560 feet long, with a curb-to-curb width of 85 feet. On-street parking, on-street bike facilities, and sidewalks exist on both sides of th e roadway. There are two (2) signalized intersections. The surrounding land uses are reside ntial with 19 residential driveways fronting the south side of the street. There are 55 mph speed limit signs posted within the segment.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
Vista Chino
Drive
West City
Limits
Landau
Boulevard 55 56 49 43 44-53 55% 0.23 50 CVC 22358.6
Vista Chino
Drive
Landau
Boulevard
Avenida
Maravilla 55 56 50 44 48-57 66% 0.12 50 CVC 22358.6
Vista Chino
Drive
Avenida
Maravilla
Date Palm
Drive 55 53 47 41 44-53 68% 0.37 50 CVC 22358.6

3-48

 Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed of 56 mph indicates a speed limit of 55 mph between West City Limits to Landau Boulevard. There are approximately 22,858 vehicles per day within this road segment. The speed survey was conducted on January 22, 2025. Within 4 years, there were 9 collisions with a collision rate of 0.23 which is l ower than the state collision rate. The surrounding land uses within this segment has the p otential to generate a high concentration of pedestrians, bicyclists, and driveway traffic. Base d on the observed conditions, CVC 22538.6, and the 85 th percentile, it is recommended that the posted spee d limit on Vista Chino Drive between West City Limits and Landau Boulevard be 50 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 56 mph indicates a speed limit of 55 mph between Landau Boulevard to Avenida Maravilla. There are approxima tely 22,500 vehicles per day within this road segment. The speed survey was conducted on Jan uary 22, 2025. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision with a collision rate of 0.12 which is lower than the state collision rate. The surrounding land uses within this segment has the p otential to generate a high concentration of pedestrians, bicyclists, and driveway traffic. Base d on the observed conditions, CVC 22358.6, and the 85 th percentile, it is recommended that the posted spee d limit on Vista Chino Drive between Landau Boulevard and Avenida Maravilla be 50 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 53 mph indicates a speed limit of 55 mph between Avenida Maravilla to Date Palm Drive. There are approximate ly 23,618 vehicles per day within this road segment. The speed survey was conducted on January 22, 2025. Within 4 years, there were 6 collisions with a collision rate of 0.37 which is lower than the state collision rate. Rounding down the 85 th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment in dicates a speed limit of 50 mph between Avenida Maravilla to Date Palm Drive. The s urrounding land uses within this segment has the potential to generate a high concentration of pedestrians, bicyclists, and driveway traffic.

Based on the observed conditions and 85 th percentile per CVC 22358.6, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on Vista Chino Drive between Avenida Maravilla and Date Palm Drive be 50 mph.

3-49

 30 th Avenue
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
For the purpose of this study, G30th Avenue is separated into four segments:
• Landau Boulevard to Avenida Maravilla
• Avenida Maravilla to Date Palm Drive
• Date Palm Drive to Santoro Drive
• Santoro Drive to Da Vall Drive
30 th Avenue between Landau Boulevard to Avenida Maravil la is an east-west roadway with two (2) lane divided segment with a painted two-way lef t turn median. The studied segment is 2,640 feet long. On street parking is allowed on both sid es with designated parking, there are bike facilities throughout the segment, and there are si dewalks on both sides throughout the segment. There is two (2) all-way stop, one (1) sig nalized intersection, and one (1) pedestrian crossing. The surrounding land uses are residential , Landau Elementary School, and a vacant lot. There are both 35 mph and 25 mph speed limit signs posted within the segment.

30 th Avenue between Avenida Maravilla to Date Palm Driv e is an east-west roadway with two (2) lane divided segment with a painted two-way lef t turn median. The studied segment is 2,653 feet long. On street parking is allowed on both sid es with designated parking, there are bike facilities throughout, and there are sidewalks on b oth sides throughout the segment. There is one (1) all-way stop intersection. The surrounding land uses are residential and Walgreens.

There are both 35 mph speed limit signs posted within the segment.

30 th Avenue between Santoro Drive to Da Vall Drive is a n east-west roadway with two (2) lane divided segment with a painted two-way left turn me dian. The studied segment is 2,639 feet long and has a curb to curb width of 63 feet. On st reet parking is allowed on both sides with designated parking, there are bike facilities throu ghout, and there are sidewalks on both sides Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
30 th
Avenue
Landau
Boulevard
Avenida
Maravilla 35 39 35 31 31-40 80% 0 35 85 th Percentile Round Down
30 th
Avenue
Avenida
Maravilla
Date Palm
Drive 35 38 34 30 29-38 76% 0 35 85 th Percentile Round Down
30 th
Avenue
Date Palm
Drive
Santoro
Drive 45 40 36 31 40-49 72% 0.14 40 85 th Percentile
30 th
Avenue
Santoro
Drive
Da Vall
Drive 45 48 44 40 40-49 76% 0 45 85 th Percentile Round Down

3-50

throughout the segment. There are two (2) all-way s top intersections and one signalized intersection. The surrounding land uses are Dennis Keat Soccer Park, James Workman Middle School, Northgate Community Church, vacant lots, an d residential. There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted within the segment.

30 th Avenue between Date Palm Drive to Santoro Drive is an east-west roadway with two (2) lane divided segment with a painted two-way left tu rn median. The studied segment is 2,617 feet long and has a curb-to-curb width of 60 feet. On street parking is allowed on both sides with designated parking, there are bike facilities throu ghout, and there are sidewalks on both sides throughout the segment except on the northern side of the vacant lot. There are two (2) all-way stop intersections. The surrounding land uses are residential and vacant lots. There are 45 mph speed limit signs posted within the segment.
 Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed of 39 mph indicates a speed limit of 40 mph between Landau Boulevard and Avenida Maravilla. The speed survey conducted on January 22, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 5,054 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions. Rounding down the 85 th percentile speed per CVC 22358.6 to the nearest 5 mph indicates a speed of 35 mph. Based on the observed conditions and 85 th percentile, and CVC 22358.6, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on 30 th Ave between Landau Boulevard and Avenida Maravilla to remain 35 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 38 mph indicates a speed limit of 40 mph between Avenida Maravilla and Date Palm Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 22, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 6,250 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions. Rounding down the 85 th percentile speed per CVC 22358.6 to the nearest 5 mph indicates a speed of 35 mph. Based on the observed conditions and the 85th percentile, and CVC 22358.6, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on 30th Ave between Avenida Maravilla and Date Palm Drive to remain 35 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 40 mph indicates a speed limit of 40 mph between Avenida Maravilla and Date Palm Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 22, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 9,556 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there was 1 collision with a collision rate of 0.14, which is lower than the state’s collision rate. Based on the observed conditions and the 85th percentile, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on 30th Ave between Date Palm Drive and Santoro Drive to be 40 mph.

The 85
th -percentile speed of 48 mph indicates a speed limit of 50 mph between Santoro Drive and Da Vall Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 22, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 5,846 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions. Rounding down the 85 th percentile speed per CVC 22358.6 to the nearest 5 mph indicates a speed of 45 mph. Based on the observed conditions, 85 th percentile, and CVC 22358.6, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on 30 th Ave between Santoro Drive and Da Vall Drive to remain 45 mph.

3-51

 33 rd Avenue
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
33rd Avenue between Cathedral Canyon Drive and Date Palm Drive is an east-west roadway with two (2) lane undivided segments. The studied segment is 2,668 feet long. On street parking is allowed on both sides, there are no bike facilit ies, and sidewalk exist throughout the segment except on the northern side between Rancho Vista Dr and Date Palm Dr. There is one all-way stop and two (2) stop control intersections. The su rrounding land uses are residential, Palm Springs Church, and vacant lots. There are 25 mph a nd 35 mph speed limit signs posted within the segment.

 Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed of 34 indicates a speed limit of 35 mph between Cathedral Canyon Drive and Date Palm Drive. The speed survey conducted on January 22, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 2,347 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 3 collisions with a collision rate of 1.74 which is higher than the state’s collision rate. Rounding down the 85 th percentile speed per CVC 22358.6 to the nearest 5 mph indicates a speed of 30 mph. Based on CVC 22358.6 it is recommended that the posted speed limit on 33 rd Ave between Cathedral Canyon Drive to Date Palm Drive be 30 mph.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
33 rd
Avenue
Cathedral
Canyon
Drive
Date Palm
Drive 25/30 34 28 24 24-33 70% 1.74 30 85 th Percentile, CVC 22358.6

3-52

 35 th Avenue
Speed Survey Summary of Findings

 Conditions
35 th Ave between Date Palm Drive to Plumley Road is an east-west roadway with two (2) lane divided roadway with yellow centerline striping. Th e studied segment is 2,632 feet long with a curb-to-curb width of 44 feet. On street parking is allowed on both sides, there are no bike facilities, and sidewalks are on both sides through out the segment. There are two (2) all-way stop intersections and one (1) stop control interse ction. The surrounding land uses are residential and Nellie N. Coffman Middle School. Th ere are 30 mph speed limit signs posted within the segment.

 Recommendations
The 85 th -percentile speed of 36 mph indicates a speed limit of 35 mph between Date Palm Drive and Plumley Road. The speed survey conducted on January 15, 2025, determined the average daily traffic of 939 vehicles per day within this segment. Within 4 years, there were 0 collisions with a collision rate of 0. Given the surrounding land uses and Nellie N. Coffman Middle School fronting the segment, there is a potential for a high concentration of pedestrians. Based on the observed conditions and 85 th percentile, and CVC 22358.7, it is recommended that the posted speed limit on 35 th Ave between Date Palm Drive and Plumley Road to remain 30 mph.

Street From To

Existing
Speed
Limit

85 th
%ile
Speed

Median
Speed

15 th
%ile
Speed

10mph
Pace
Range

% in
Pace
Range
Accidents
per
Million
Vehicle
Miles

Recom
Speed
Limit

Justification
35 th
Avenue
Date Palm
Drive
Plumley
Road 30 36 32 26 26-35 74% 0 30 CVC 22358.7