Cities Index.
Consent Item 8. Cascade Energy Contract

Ava Community Energy Board of Directors
March 15, 2023

Document
Consent Item 8. Cascade Energy Contract
Meeting
March 15, 2023
Body
Ava Community Energy Board of Directors
Original file
587 KB
Text extracted from the CCA's file for reading and search. Open the original on avaenergy.org. That file is the official record.

Consent Item 8
Consent Item 8
TO: East Bay Community Energy Board of Directors
FROM: JP Ross, VP Local Development, Electrification, and Innovation SUBJECT: Authorizing CEO to negotiate and execute contract with Cascade Energy for the Commercial Energy Efficiency Pay for Performance Program
DATE: March 15, 2023
__________________________________________________________________ Recommendation
Approve a Resolution authorizing the CEO to negotiate and execute a Contract with Cascade Energy to lead program implementation for the Commercial Energy Efficiency (“EE”) Pay for Performance (“P4P”) Program, compensation under this Contract will not exceed $11,569,528.

Background and Discussion
EBCE’s efforts to launch a Commercial EE P4P Program stems from EBCE’s 2018 Local Development Business Plan (LDBP) which outlines a series of recommendations to advance local investments, including a strategy to develop energy efficiency programs. Energy efficiency not only provides the opportunity to deliver bill savings and building comfort to customers, it is also a tool for EBCE to reduce overall baseload consumption and influence peak demand. Given the high value provided to customers and the overall alignment with EBCE’s carbon reduction goals, energy efficiency is an organizational priority.

EBCE partnered with Recurve Analytics to pilot a Commercial EE Program in 2021 which explored the potential of a new EE Program model called “pay-for-performance.” Historical energy efficiency programs pay incentives to customers based on estimated or “deemed” savings calculations. Instead, P4P programs pay incentives based on actual savings impacts as measured at the meter. P4P programs not only protect EBCE against potential overpayment relative to actual results, but they also offer more flexibility in project implementation. Recurve’s piloted program design involved setting up a marketplace of contractors or “aggregators” to perform energy efficiency projects and get paid directly for their actual delivered savings Consent Item 8
measured at the meter. In this model, incentive payment is provided directly to the contractor, with no required pass-through to the customer. Results from the pilot indicated market readiness and were used to justify a scaled program.

To obtain ratepayer funding for the Commercial EE P4P Program, EBCE pursued the “elect to administer” pathway – one of two pathways offered to CCAs to administer the Commercial EE P4P Program. EBCE’s Commercial Energy Efficiency Program Plan and Advice Letter were certified by the CPUC in Resolution E-5215 in September 2022.

The Resolution allocates a budget of $13,463,049 of funding collected from EBCE’s customers for EBCE to administer a commercial energy efficiency program. The program design presented in the Energy Efficiency Program Plan was based off Recurve’s model.
2022 Commercial Energy Efficiency P4P RFP
In October of 2022, EBCE put forth a Request for Proposal (“RFP”) for program implementation and measurement & verification services. The RFP solicitated proposals for program designs that 1) deliver cost effective savings to customers, 2) cross-promote demand response 3) and encourage electrification. Key parameters for the RFP were as follows:
• Savings need to be measured using a CPUC-approved Normalized Metered Energy Consumption (NMEC) methodology
• RFP is technology-agnostic, though explicitly stated it would not provide funding for gas efficiency measures.
• Include customer education on Time of Use (TOU) and peak load management • Cost effectiveness requirement of 1.07 TRC.
• Implementer budget is$11,569,528, 71% going to incentives. • Program term is 2023 – 2027, with three years of active project deployment, and the last year dedicated to measurement and verification (M&V) EBCE received two conforming bids from Recurve Analytics and Cascade Energy. While both programs were P4P-based and complied with the key parameters laid out in the solicitation, both program designs were different”:
• Recurve’s program approach leveraged a contractor marketplace to target customers for energy efficiency projects. Performance-based incentives would be paid directly to contractors. While there is flexibility for contractors to pass on part of incentive to customers, this would not be required. (This is the same model used in our pilot).
• Cascade Energy proposed a Strategic Energy Management (“SEM”) program design that involves recruiting a small set of high usage commercial and industrial customers to participate in energy management education cohorts. The program relies on partnering with building owners/facility managers to evaluate low-to-no behavioral, retro-commissioning, or operational improvement (“BRO”) measures. Cost savings from initial BRO measures would also be used to justify further investment in EE upgrades and electrification.

Consent Item 8
Selection Justification
We ultimately decided to pursue contracting with Cascade Energy for the following reasons:

1. Cost effectiveness: Cascade’s proposed program is significantly more cost-effective than Recurve’s proposal because it takes a holistic approach to energy efficiency as it focuses on BRO measures and capital projects. SEM program approaches are notably cost-effective for commercial buildings as the bulk of savings comes from fine tuning existing equipment and operations.1 Additionally, the CPUC has authorized Recurve to administer the Summer Reliability Market Access Program (MAP) in response to the Governor’s Emergency Proclamation. The MAP program uses the same program design Recurve proposed but is not subject to cost-effectiveness requirements and only runs during the summer months of 2022 and 2023. Because of this, the MAP program is able to afford significantly greater incentives, which would put EBCE’s Commercial EE Program (if using the Recurve model) at a competitive disadvantage.

2. High touchpoint with customer: Cascade proposes targeting a small set (34) of high usage commercial and industrial customers to recruit into energy management cohorts. Unlike the Recurve model which relies on contractors to recruit their own projects, the Cascade design relies heavily on customer interaction and relationship building. Given the small subset of customers, EBCE will be able to play a role with customer recruitment as well as develop deep relationships with customers over the course of the program. As EBCE begins prioritizing brand awareness, this customer touchpoint will be invaluable for brand recognition. Additionally, incentives will be paid directly to the customer, not the contractor, further enhancing the value proposition to customers.

3. Ability to test strategies for commercial electrification: Cascade’s proposal also poses a significant opportunity to test strategies for commercial electrification, a nascent but critical element of building electrification. This program will give EBCE a close-up understanding of the unique barriers that C&I customers face and the relevant pathways to success.

In addition to these points, the Cascade Energy and their subcontractor kW Engineering team are qualified to do this work. Cascade Energy has been running SEM programs for SCE, SoCalGas, and SDG&E since 2018. Additionally, they administer programs in 15 other states outside of California. With their experience working with SEM design, they have successfully recruited over 500 SEM participants across all programs. Additionally, through their work with California IOUs, Cascade Energy is familiar with the level of program data needed for CPUC reporting requirements and will be able to easily collaborate with our subcontractor, Frontier, to accurately capture savings information. kW Engineering, an Oakland-based energy consulting firm, has over 20 years of experience providing technical expertise and engineering 1 Smith, Chris. Belkhayat, Kathleen. Kesting, Oliver. Pay for Performance Case Study – 3 Years of Performance. ACEEE Summer Study, 2018.

Consent Item 8
reviews for various commercial and industrial buildings. They have also assigned a dedicated electrification lead to support participants with potential projects.

Fiscal Impact
The contractor amount is a total NTE of $11,569,528 with a contract term of 2023 – 2027. All funding is coming from approved CPUC-approved ratepayer funds in Resolution E-5125.

Attachments
A) Resolution of the Board of Directors of the East Bay Community Energy Authority Authorizing the CEO to Execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Cascade Energy
B) PowerPoint Presentation
Attachment Consent Item 8A
RESOLUTION NO. R-2023-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

OF THE EAST BAY COMMUNITY ENERGY AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE CEO TO EXECUTE A CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CASCADE ENERGY, INC.

WHEREAS The East Bay Community Energy Authority (“EBCE”) was formed as a community choice aggregation agency (“CCA”) on December 1, 2016, Under the Joint Exercise of Power Act, California Government Code sections 6500 et seq., among the County of Alameda, and the Cities of Albany, Berkeley, Dublin, Emeryville, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore, Piedmont, Oakland, San Leandro, and Union City to study, promote, develop, conduct, operate, and manage energy-related climate change programs in all of the member jurisdictions. The cities of Newark and Pleasanton, located in Alameda County, along with the City of Tracy, located in San Joaquin County, were added as members of EBCE and parties to its Joint Powers Agreement in March of 2020.

WHEREAS, On July 18, 2018, the Board approved the Local Development Business Plan (“LDBP”) and budget. The LDBP identifies a series of local development early actions, including a strategy to develop energy efficiency programs, WHEREAS, in September 2022, EBCE was approved for a $13 million ratepayer funded commercial energy efficiency program administered under the auspices of the CPUC and subject to CPUC compliance requirements,
WHEREAS, in October 2022, EBCE issued a Request for Proposal “RFP” for implementation and measurement and verification services with the objectives of 1) delivering cost-effective savings, 2) cross promoting load-shifting practices, and 3) encouraging electrification program,
WHEREAS, EBCE received two conforming bids and selected Cascade Energy’s Strategic Energy Management program design for the EBCE Commercial Energy Efficiency Program, and
WHEREAS EBCE has selected Cascade Energy to provide these commercial energy efficiency program services and wishes to contract with them.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE EAST BAY COMMUNITY ENERGY AUTHORITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. THE CEO is hereby authorized to negotiate and execute a four year Contract with Cascade Energy for the implementation of the Commercial Energy Efficiency Program. Compensation under this Agreement is not to exceed $11,569,528.

Attachment Consent Item 8A
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 15th day of March, 2023.

Elisa Marquez, Chair
ATTEST:

Adrian Bankhead, Clerk of the Board
Commercial
Energy Efficiency
Program
MARCH 2023
Attachment Consent Item 8B
Commercial P4P Energy Efficiency Program Background
2 2021 – 2022: EBCE ran 3 pilots to
test market-readiness for P4P
2022: CPUC approved $13M for
4-year program commercial P4P
EE program
- Subject to TRC = 1.07
- Only serve EBCE customers
- Must file JCM (PG&E Market Access
and BayREN Business)
Year Gross kWh Savings Gross kW
1 9,011,867 1029
2 9,011,867 1029
3 12,304,105 1405
Attachment Consent Item 8B
Commercial P4P Energy Efficiency Solicitation
3 Program Objectives: 1) Deliver cost-effective energy savings, 2) Cross-promote demand response to maximize peak load reductions, and 3) Encourage electrification of existing natural gas end uses.

Cascade Energy model
- Strategic Energy Management program
- Targets 34 high usage C&I customers
- Incentives paid directly to customers
- TRC = 2.3, highly cost-effective
- High customer touchpoint (brand
recognition and relationship
development)
Recurve model
- Manages a network of contractors
- Incentives paid directly to contractors
- TRC < 1.0, not cost-effective given
competing programs
- Low/no customer touchpoint
Attachment Consent Item 8B
What is Strategic Energy Management?
4 Goal Setting Workshops Treasure Hunts No/low-cost Capital Projects O&M Projects
Document customers
targets for energy
reduction, cost
savings, and
environmental impact
Educational modules
on energy
management, peak
load shifting, and
electrification
Site visits to assess
current building
operations, energy
usage, operational
practices, and identify
opportunities
Implement low/no
cost behavioral,
retro-commissioning, and
operation measures
Implement custom
capital EE upgrade
projects and
electrification
Ongoing Technical Support
and Coaching
Attachment Consent Item 8B
Cascade Commercial P4P Energy Efficiency Details
5 Program Name: STEER (SEM, Training, Efficiency, and Electrification Resource Program) Attachment Consent Item 8B
Requested Actions
6 Attachment Consent Item 8B

← All documents from this meeting