Policy Board of Directors
Friday, January 21, 2022
2:00 PM
Central Coast Community Energy
70 Garden Court, Suite 300
Monterey, CA 93940
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING COVID-19 MEETING REQUIREMENTS The special procedures in place to minimize the spread of the COVID-19 virus may supersede general meeting procedures and delay distribution of materials to members, although every effort will be made to ensure comments and materials received prior to the meeting end will be made part of the record.
Based on guidance from the California Department of Public Health and the California Governor’s Office, in order to minimize the spread of the COVID-19 virus, please do the following:
1. You are strongly encouraged to observe the live stream of the CCCE Policy Board of Director’s meeting at: https://3cenergy.hylandcloud.com/203agendaonline/Meetings/Search?dropid=4
2. The CCCE Board Room remains open. If you attend the CCCE Policy Board of Director’s meeting in person:
a. You will be required to (i) wear a mask during the meeting and (ii) maintain appropriate social distancing, i.e., maintain a 6-foot distance between yourself and other individuals. b. Additional seating with audio of the CCCE Policy Board of Director’s meeting will be available in the CCCE Main Conference Room, located at 70 Garden Court, Suite 300, Monterey, CA 93940. Meetings are accessible to people with disabilities. Individuals who need special assistance or a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, or who have a disability and wish to request an alternative format for the meeting materials, should contact Heather Vowell, Board Clerk, at 831-641-7216 or [email protected]. Requests should be made as soon as possible but at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
3. If you choose not to attend the CCCE Policy Board of Director’s meeting but wish to make a comment on a specific agenda item, you may please submit your comment as set out below. The timing of public comment shall be at the discretion of the Chair. Options for public comment are as follows:
a. To have your comments distributed to the Board prior to the meeting submit your comment via email by 5:00 p.m. on the Tuesday before the meeting. All comments received after 5:00pm on the Tuesday before the meeting will be retained as part of the record and distributed to the Board after the meeting. Please submit your comment to the Clerk of the Board at [email protected]. To assist the Clerk in identifying the agenda item relating to your public comment please indicate in the Subject Line, the meeting body (i.e., Policy Board Agenda) and item number (i.e., Item No. 3).
You may participate through ZOOM. For ZOOM participation please join by computer audio at:
https://us02web.zoom.us/s/82977357049
OR the following phone number(s):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 669 219 2599
Enter this Meeting ID number: 829 7735 7049 when prompted. Please note there is no Participant Code, you will just hit # again after the recording prompts you.
You will be placed in the meeting as an attendee; when you are ready to make a public comment if joined by computer audio, please Raise your Hand; and by phone please push *9 on your keypad.
If you have anything that you wish to be distributed to the Board, please provide 15 copies and hand them to a member of CCCE staff or Heather Vowell, Board Clerk, who will distribute the information to the Board members and other staff.
The public may comment on a specific item listed on this agenda when the Board considers that item. In addition, the members of the public may request and receive copies without undue delay of any documents that are distributed to the Board, unless there is a specific exemption under the Public Records Act that prevents the disclosure of the record. (Cal. Gov’t Code Section 54957.5) In compliance with Government Code Section 54957.5, non-exempt writings that are distributed to a majority or all of the Board in advance of a meeting and that relate to an agenda item will be made available at CCCE’s offices located at 70 Garden Court, Suite 300, Monterey, CA 93940 during normal business hours and are also available on the CCCE website located at:
https://3cenergy.hylandcloud.com/203agendaonline
AGENDA
. Welcome & Roll Call
CLOSED SESSION
1. Conference with Real Property Negotiators Under Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 1352 Lighthouse Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA 93950 CCCE Negotiator: Tom Habashi
Negotiating Parties: U.S. General Services Administration, Real Property Utilization and Disposal Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
CONSENT AGENDA
2. Approve Minutes from the December 15, 2021 Meeting of the Policy Board (Action Item)
3. Consider Finding, Pursuant to AB 361 and in order for the Policy Board of Directors to Continue Meeting Remotely, that the COVID-19 Pandemic State of Emergency Declared by Governor Newsom is Still In Effect; The Policy Board of Directors has Reconsidered the Circumstances of the State of Emergency; and the Monterey County Health Officer Continues to Recommend Social Distancing Measures for Meetings of Legislative Bodies (Action Item)
REGULAR AGENDA
4. Approve and Direct the CEO to Pay a Refundable $75,000 Registration Deposit to Participate in an Online Auction Conducted by the U.S. General Services Administration to Purchase (pending bid acceptance) Approximately 4.28 acres Containing a 11,200 square foot Building Located at 1352 Lighthouse Avenue in Pacific Grove (the “Property”) to Serve as CCCE’s Permanent Headquarters.
Adjournment
Policy Board of Directors
Wednesday, December 15, 2021
9:00AM
Central Coast Community Energy
70 Garden Court, Suite 300
Monterey, CA 93940
MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 9:00 a.m. 1 with member(s) attending in-person and 12 members attending via teleconference pursuant to AB 361 and a quorum established.
Directors Present in-person:Tomlinson
Directors Present via
teleconference:
Carbone, Estrada, Julian, Kosmicki, Marx, Coonerty, Meyers, Nomura, Tomlinson, A. Velazquez, Hartman, Chair McShane
Directors Absent: Brooks, Lee, Patino, I. Velazquez
The Chair opened the public comment for items not on the agenda.
The following individual(s) addressed the Board
John Smigelski
The Chair closed the public comment period.
Corrections or Additions
COO announced that there were no corrections or additions.
CONSENT AGENDA
The Chair opened the public comment period.
There were no public comments.
The Chair closed the public comment period.
MOTION: Moved by Director Adams Seconded by Director Marx to approve the Consent Agenda.
ACTION: The motion carried with a vote: 12/0/4/1
AYES: Adams, Carbone, Estrada, Kosmicki, Marx, Coonerty, Meyers, Tomlinson, A.
Velazquez, Hartman, Chair McShane
NOES: None
ABSENT: Brooks, Lee, Patino, I. Velazquez
ABSTAIN: Nomura
1. Approved Minutes from the September 16, 2021 Regular Meeting of the Policy Board
2. Considered Finding, Pursuant to AB 361 and in order for the Policy Board of Directors to Continue Meeting Remotely, that the COVID-19 Pandemic State of Emergency Declared by Governor Newsom is Still In Effect; The Policy Board of Directors has Reconsidered the Circumstances of the State of Emergency; and the Monterey County Health Officer Continues to Recommend Social Distancing Measures for Meetings of Legislative Bodies
REGULAR AGENDA
3. Adopted Resolution No. 2021-PB-09 Approving an Increase in CCCE’s Electric Generation Rates for All Customer Classes in Pacific Gas & Electric Service Area to Offset the Increased Cost of Energy Effective as of PG&E’s Projected Rate Increase; Increase Funding to the Rate Stabilization Fund; Provide Services to Support Member Agencies’ Efforts to Reduce GHG; and Provide a Bill Credit for CARE, FERA, and/or Medical Baseline Customer Accounts
The Chair opened the public comment period.
The following individual(s) addressed the Board
Seth Capron
Michael Chiacos
Leslie Austin
Jeff Byron
The Chair closed the public comment period.
MOTION: Moved by Director Marx, seconded by Director Carbone to approve Staff Recommendation of Option 3.
ACTION: The motion carried with a roll call vote: 13/1/3 AYES: Adams, Carbone, Estrada, Julian, Kosmicki, Marx, Coonerty, Meyers, Nomura, Tomlinson, A. Velazquez, Hartman, Chair McShane NOES: Patino (arrived at 9:12am)
ABSENT: Brooks, Lee, I. Velazquez
4. Approved to Allocate Two Percent (2%) of Operating Revenues to Support CCCE Member Agency Program and Initiatives that Further CCCE’s Strategic Goals
The Chair opened the public comment period.
The following individual(s) addressed the Board
Seth Capron
Michael Chiacos
The Chair closed the public comment period.
MOTION: Moved by Director Velazquez, seconded by Director Marx to approve ACTION: The motion carried with a roll call vote: 14/0/3 AYES: Adams, Carbone, Estrada, Julian, Kosmicki, Marx, Coonerty, Meyers, Patino, Nomura, Tomlinson, A. Velazquez, Hartman, Chair McShane NOES: None
ABSENT: Brooks, Lee, I. Velazquez
Adjourned at 10:18 am
Staff Report Item 3
TO: CCCE Policy Board of Directors
FROM: Tom Habashi, Chief Executive Officer
SUBJECT: Consider Finding, Pursuant to AB 361 and in order for the Policy Board of Directors to Continue Meeting Remotely, that the COVID-19 Pandemic State of Emergency Declared by Governor Newsom is Still In Effect; The Policy Board of Directors has Reconsidered the Circumstances of the State of Emergency; and the Monterey County Health Officer Continues to Recommend Social Distancing Measures for Meetings of Legislative Bodies (Action Item)
DATE: January 21, 2022
RECOMMENDATION:
This recommends the Policy Board (“Board”) find, pursuant to AB 361 and for the Board to continue meeting remotely, that the COVID-19 pandemic State of Emergency declared by Governor Newsom is still in effect; the Board has considered the circumstances of the State of Emergency; and the Monterey County Health Officer continues to recommend social distancing measures for meetings of legislative bodies.
BACKGROUND:
On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed AB 361. This legislation amends the Brown Act to allow Brown Act bodies to meet via teleconference during a proclaimed state of emergency in accordance with teleconference procedures established by AB 361 rather than under the Brown Act's more narrow standard rules for teleconference meetings.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
AB 361 provides that if a state or local health official recommends social distancing, a legislative body may meet remotely after September 30, 2021, provided that the legislative body finds 1) the Governor's proclaimed state of emergency is still in effect; 2) the legislative body has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency, and 3) either the Monterey County Health Officer continues to recommend social distancing measures for meetings of legislative bodies or the state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet in person.
The Monterey County Health Officer has recommended social distancing measures for meetings of legislative bodies. To continue meeting remotely, the Boards must make the findings outlined above.
Accordingly, staff recommends making the appropriate findings. This action will be required every 30 days to keep meeting remotely. A special meeting may be necessary for that purpose.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
CONCLUSION:
The Board’s consideration and finding that the COVID-19 pandemic State of Emergency declared by Governor Newsom is still in effect; the Board has reconsidered the circumstances of the State of Emergency; and the Monterey County Health Officer continues to recommend social distancing measures for meetings of legislative bodies will allow the Board to continue meeting remotely under the procedures established by AB 361.
Staff Report Item 4
TO: CCCE Policy Board of Directors
FROM: Tom Habashi, Chief Executive Officer
SUBJECT: Approve and Direct the CEO to Pay a Refundable $75,000 Registration Deposit to Participate in an Online Auction Conducted by the U.S. General Services Administration to Purchase (pending bid acceptance) Approximately 4.28 acres Containing a 11,200 square foot Building Located at 1352 Lighthouse Avenue in Pacific Grove (the “Property”) to Serve as CCCE’s Permanent Headquarters (Action Item) DATE: January 21, 2022
RECOMMENDATION
This recommends the Policy Board approve and direct the CEO to pay a $75,000 refundable registration deposit to participate in an online auction conducted by the U.S. General Services Administration (“GSA”) to purchase (pending bid acceptance) approximately 4.28 acres containing a 11,200 square foot building located at 1352 Lighthouse Avenue in Pacific Grove (the “Property”) to serve as CCCE’s permanent headquarters.
BACKGROUND
In October 2019, the Operations Board approved site selection criteria for a corporate headquarters as follows:
1. Location (e.g., commute time for CCCE employees, directors, and council members)
2. Availability and cost of Real estate
3. Buildability of lot or functionality of existing space layout
4. Ordinances or zoning considerations
5. Infrastructure conditions (e.g., roads and utilities)
6. Proximity to highways and services such as restaurants
7. Accessibility to talented workforce
The Policy Board directed the CEO to conduct a search for a permanent headquarters and in December 2019, approved executing a conditional letter of intent to purchase 3.4 acres of land in Marina, California on which a headquarters would be developed. Total land, design, and construction costs at the time were estimated to be $10 million. Due to market uncertainty and significant increases in construction costs resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, the Policy Board later directed staff to terminate the Marina negotiations.
Staff has continued its search for a permanent headquarters site. CCCE’s current lease for 11,000 square feet at 70 Garden Court ends December 31, 2022.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
The Property is a potential once in a lifetime opportunity to acquire a building and 4.28 acres of coastal land that meets CCCE’s operational needs, will help attract and recruit talent, and position CCCE at the center of California public power.
The Property, located on a portion of the United States Light Station Reservation at Point Pinos, has previously been used for office and operational uses and its 11,200 square feet is similar to CCCE’s current office space.
The Property is central to CCCE’s existing employee base and can serve to attract future talent to CCCE.
Bringing employees back to in-office work will require, among other things, a more attractive office location and physical layout. The Property is adjacent to both the ocean as well as Pacific Grove downtown dining and other amenities. The Property also offers an opportunity to redesign the interior to fit CCCE’s needs, and the flexible workspace needs of today’s employees.
The Property also offers a unique opportunity to make CCCE a focal location for California’s CCAs. The location, along with the local convention and hotel industry, can help attract energy and renewable industry conferences, speakers, workshops, and other opportunities that will raise CCCE’s visibility within the industry.
Auction Process
The GSA is using an online auction process to sell the property. The minimum bid is $1,000,000 with bidding increments of $200,000. The auction continues until the expiration of a twenty-four-hour inactivity period. GSA’s acceptance of the winning bid forms a binding agreement to purchase the Property with only formal execution of transfer documents left remaining to finalize the purchase.
Property Details
The cast in place two story building was built in 1952. The GSA makes no warranties or representations regarding the Property, its condition, its zoning, or allowed uses.
The Property is zoned "O" for Open space and currently designated for an "Open Space Institutional" City Land Use. The Property is located within the California Coastal Zone and falls under the California Coastal Zone Management Act and Pacific Grove’s Local Coastal Program as well as its Land Use Plan and Implementing Ordinances certified by the California Coastal Commission.
While an on-site inspection is available after registration for the GSA auction, the GSA website has historic condition assessments, disclosures, surveys, and photos available. CCCE has conducted an appraisal and anticipates conducting a site inspection supported by a local appraiser.
Other Sites Under Evaluation
Staff continues to work with a local commercial real estate broker to evaluate other potential sites for CCCE’s permanent headquarters. Timing, staff resources, and still elevated construction costs have focused staff’s search on existing building opportunities.
Thus far, staff has toured 3 properties located within one mile of the existing office. The size of these properties range between 33,000 to 70,000 square feet. Choosing one of these building will necessitate finding other parties to lease the extra space, considering that the current office space is 11,000 square feet and the likelihood of tripling staff in the Monterey area is, at best, remote.
FISCAL IMPACT:
To participate in the auction, CCCE must deposit $75,000. In the event of a winning bid, the deposit would be applied to the purchase price. If unsuccessful, the deposit would be returned. The fiscal impact of the building purchase would vary depending on the amount of the winning bid up to a maximum amount as directed by the Board.
CONCLUSION:
Participating in the auction for 1352 Lighthouse Avenue would position CCCE to potentially secure a desirable, high-profile site for its new headquarters.
ATTACHMENT(S):
1. Azul Bay Invitation for Bids
2. Site Photos
3. Disclosures
4. Video available at https://vimeo.com/557869403
5. Additional photos and virtual tour available at https://www.loopnet.com/Listing/1352-Lighthouse-Ave-Pacific-Grove-CA/23178359/ Azul Bay
Sales Information
Melissa Morgan
415-813-9862
[email protected]
Online Auction
RealEstateSales.gov
Register and submit your bid
Online Auction Assistance
Luis Blandon
415-734-8367
[email protected]
Send Bid Form and Registration Deposit
to:
U.S. General Services Administration
Real Property Utilization and Disposal (#9PZ)
Attention: Melissa Morgan
See page 10 for requirements.
Property Disposal Web Page
https://propertydisposal.gsa.gov
Inspection Opportunities:
The Property will be open for inspection by
appointment only for registered bidders who have
paid the registration deposit of $75,000. See
Inspection Instructions on page 4 for details on
site inspection requests.
Auction Summary
Sale Type: Online Auction
Start Date: January 31, 2022
11:00AM Time Central
Soft Close Date: March 9, 2022
11:00AM Time Central
Starting Bid: $ 1,000,000
Registration Deposit: $ 75,000
Bid Increment: $ 200,000
Table of Contents
Property Description
Terms of Sale
Instructions to Bidders
Notices and Covenants
Bidder Registration and Bid Form
Attachment 1- Sample Quitclaim Deed
Attachment 2- Artist Offer to Waive Rights
Attachment 3- Floor Plans
page 2
page 3
page 10
page 17
page 18
page 20
page 29
page 30
U.S. General Services Administration
Invitation for Bids
SALE OF GOVERNMENT REAL PROPERTY
AZUL BAY
IFB Number SFRAN922173201
GSA Control No. 9-C-CA-1732-AA
Issued on 12/20/2021
This Property is located at 1352 Lighthouse Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950. The Property contains approximately 4.28 acres and is improved with 1 building of approximately 11,200.00 +/- gross square feet.
Bids for the purchase of the Government-owned Property described in the Property Description portion of this Invitation for Bids will be received continuously and will be posted at RealEstateSales.gov.
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 1 of 32
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 2 of 32
1. LOCATION AND SETTING
The subject property is located in Monterey County about 2 miles northwest of the Monterey Bay Aquarium and Cannery Row. This parcel is a portion of the United States Light Station Reservation at Point Pinos. Primary highway access to the area is via California State Route 1, which runs through the city of Monterey.
2. SALE PARCEL DESCRIPTION
The subject property contains a 3-story, +/- 11,200 square feet office building and is located on a +/- 4.28 acres.
The building is located in the northwest corner of the property. The facility was occupied by the Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The two story penthouse facility was constructed in 1952 to serve as an air interceptor training facility for the Navy. This building is a cast-in-place concrete building with concrete shear walls and concrete floor and roof joists and beams. The building also contains a mural, “Green Seas/Blue Seas: The California Current, Climate Change, and Sustainable Fisheries” which depicts changing oceanographic regimes over the last 100 years in Monterey Bay.
3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION
See “Exhibit A” located at the end of Attachment 1.
4. TAX PARCEL ID (OR ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.)
APN: 007-011-005-000
City of Pacific Grove, Monterey County, California
5. UTILITIES & SERVICE PROVIDERS
Procurement of utility service shall be the responsibility of the Purchaser as of the date of conveyance. Bidders are urged to contact utility providers for the local service area. Below are the current utility service providers.
Gas and Electric
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E): https://www.pge.com/ Internet
Xfinity: https://www.xfinity.com/learn/internet-service AT&T: https://www.att.com/internet/
Water, Sewer and Storm Drain
California-American Water Company: https://www.amwater.com/caaw/ Monterey One Water: https://www.montereyonewater.org/
Solid Waste Disposal
GreenWaste Recovery - Pacific Grove: http://www.greenwaste.com/pacific-grove/
TERMS OF SALE
1. DEFINITIONS
a. AUTOMATIC BID
Also known as “bid by proxy” wherein the bidder establishes a person to bid on their behalf at auction up to a certain limit. In the case of online auctions, computers have automated the proxy role and bidders establish their bid limits online and the software answers bid challenges by automatically making the next bid increment up to the proxy limit.
b. BACKUP BIDDER
The term “Backup Bidder” refers to the bidder, whose bid conforms to the terms and conditions of the IFB, is the second-highest dollar bid at the close of the auction and is determined by the Government to be the second most acceptable bid.
c. BIDDER(S)
The term “Bidder” or “Bidders” as used herein refers to the offeror or offerors for the purchase of the subject Property, and is used interchangeably with “you.”
d. BID INCREMENT/INTERVAL
The “Bid Increment” is the minimum amount of money required to increase a starting or current bid. “Bid Interval” is the maximum amount of time in which to make a bid before the auction ends. The Bid Interval is also referred to as the Inactivity Period at RealEstateSales.gov.
e. BROKER/BROKERAGE
The term "broker" as used herein refers to a person with an active real estate license in the State where he/she practices real estate who, in exchange for a commission, acts for another person or entity solely as agent in conformance with "Instructions to Bidders" Section 13 contained herein. The “brokerage” is the business entity of the broker representing the Bidder(s). A broker must be acting as an agent and cannot be a party to the contract to receive a commission.
f. CLOSE TIME
Close Time is stated on the RealEstateSales.gov website in the “Item Information” section and represented by the Time Remaining countdown clock as the time remaining for making bids. Online auction sales cannot end on Weekends or Federal Holidays
g. EARNEST MONEY
The term “Earnest Money” refers to the Bidder’s deposit of money demonstrating the Purchaser’s good faith offer to the Government to fully execute and comply with all terms, conditions, covenants and agreements contained in any contract resulting from the Government’s acceptance of the Bidder’s offered bid price. Once a bid is accepted by the Government for contract, all prior deposits made by the Purchaser to register for the sale, subject to this Invitation for Bids, become Earnest Money to the benefit, custody, accountability and control of the Government.
h. FLAT BID
A flat bid is for an amount at least the current bid plus the posted minimum Bid Increment. If the bid is greater than another bidder’s automatic bid, the system will consider this flat bid as the current (winning) bid. If the bid is less than or equal to another bidder’s automatic bid, the system will record the bid but it will not be considered the current (winning) bid.
i. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
The term “General Services Administration” (“GSA”) as used herein refers to the United States General Services Administration, a Federal agency conducting this sale in agreement with the United States National Oceanic IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 3 of 32
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has full custody of and all accountability for all matters, known and unknown, concerning the physical, title, and environmental condition of the Property.
j. GOVERNMENT
The term “Government” as used herein refers to the United States of America, and is used interchangeably with “Seller” and “Grantor.”
k. HIGH BIDDER
The term “High Bidder” refers to the bidder, whose bid conforms to the terms and conditions of the IFB, is the highest dollar bid at the close of the auction and is determined by the Government to be the most acceptable bid.
l. INVITATION FOR BIDS
The term "Invitation for Bids" ("IFB") refers to this document and the following items that are attached hereto and incorporated herein: the Property Description; Terms of Sale; Instructions to Bidders; Notice and Covenants; Bidder Registration and Bid Form for Purchase of Government Property; Exhibits and Additional Documents. Should the aforementioned documents be modified or supplemented by any addenda or amendments, or replaced by a new issue, issued by the Government prior to the conclusion of the online auction, those modifications, addenda or amendments, shall be part of the reissued IFB. m. PROPERTY
The term “Property” refers to the property or properties described in the Property Description of this IFB. n. PURCHASER
The term “Purchaser” refers to the bidder whose bid the Government accepts and is used interchangeably with “Buyer” and “Grantee.”
o. WEBSITE
The GSA Auctions® website, GSAAuctions.gov, has been developed to allow the general public the opportunity to bid electronically on a wide array of Federal assets, including real property. Auctions for real property are offered as a separate asset category at GSA Auctions and can be viewed at RealEstateSales.gov. Additional information can also be found at propertydisposal.gsa.gov.
2. DESCRIPTION PROVIDED IN IFB
The description of the Property, and all other information provided with respect to the Property set forth in the IFB, are based on the best information available to GSA, Real Property Utilization and Disposal (#9PZ) and are believed to be correct. Any error or omission, including but not limited to, the omission of any information available to the agency having custody over the Property and/or any other Federal agency, shall NOT constitute grounds or reason for nonperformance of the contract of sale, or claim by purchaser for allowance, refund or deduction from the purchase price. The IFB is made available at Realestatesales.gov and may be modified and amended by the Government at any time prior to the conclusion of the auction. Bidder agrees and accepts that notices of any changes to the descriptions provided in this IFB is satisfactory when made available on either or both of GSA’s real property disposal websites at RealEstateSales.gov and/or disposal.gsa.gov.
3. INSPECTION
An inspection of the property is available by appointment only for registered bidders who have paid the registration deposit of $75,000. Opportunities to inspect the Property will be available by appointment only.
Admittance and access onto the Property will be allowed only with a prior reservation and the presence of a Federal Government representative.
To request an inspection, send an email to [email protected] at least five (5) business days before the requested tour date with the following information: (i) all participant names and affiliations/companies; and (ii) two tour date and time options. The maximum number of participants per group is limited to five (5) persons. Phone call requests IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 4 of 32
for appointments will not be accepted. Additional dates and times may be added, depending on demand. A GSA Site Inspection Health Waiver form must be completed and emailed to [email protected] by the day of the requested tour date.
Below are available dates and times available to request:
Monday, January 31, 2022 (9:30 AM/ 11:00 AM/ 1:30 PM/ 3:00 PM) PT Tuesday, February 1, 2022 (9:30 AM/ 11:00 AM/ 1:30 PM) PT Wednesday, February 16, 2022 (9:30 AM/ 11:00 AM/ 1:30 PM/ 3:00 PM) PT Thursday February 17, 2022 (9:30 AM/ 11:00 AM/ 1:30 PM) PT Bidders are invited, urged, and cautioned to inspect the Property prior to submitting a bid. Photos provided by the Government may not represent the condition or existence of any improvements of the Property and are NOT to be relied upon in place of the Bidder's own inspection. Any maps, illustrations or other graphical images of the Property are provided for visual context and are NOT to be relied upon in place of the Bidder’s own inspection. The failure of any bidder to inspect, or to be fully informed as to the condition of all or any portion of the Property, will not constitute grounds for any claim or demand for adjustment or withdrawal of a bid after the auction.
4. CONTRACT
The IFB and the bid, when accepted by the Government shall constitute an agreement for sale (“Agreement”) between the high bidder (“Purchaser”) and the Government. Such Agreement shall constitute the whole contract to be succeeded only by the formal instrument(s) of transfer, unless modified in writing and signed by both parties. No oral statements or representations made by, or for, or on behalf of either party shall be a part of such contract. In addition, the Purchaser shall not transfer or assign the Agreement without the express written consent of the Government. Any assignment transaction without such consent shall be void.
5. CONDITION OF PROPERTY
The Property is offered for sale “AS IS” AND “WHERE IS” without representation or warranty, expressed or implied. The Purchaser, and Purchaser’s successors and assigns, or any party-in-possession of the Property, or any part thereof, further acknowledges that the Government makes no representations or warranty concerning the title, zoning, character, condition, size, quantity, quality and state of repair of the Property. The Government makes no other agreement or promise to alter, improve, adapt or repair the Property not otherwise contained herein.
Purchaser shall rely solely on its own due diligence and examination of the Property. Purchaser acknowledges that there will be no claims or any allowances or deductions upon grounds that the Property is not in condition or fit to be used for any purpose intended by the Purchaser after the conclusion of the auction. An “As Is, Where Is” provision will be included in the Quitclaim Deed and is provided in the Notices and Covenants section.
6. ZONING
The Property is zoned “O” Open Space Institutional and a buyer would need to obtain necessary entitlements prior to re-development.
The Property is subject to the jurisdiction of the Pacific Grove Community Development Department. Verification of the present zoning and determination of permitted uses, along with compliance of the Property for any proposed future use, shall be the responsibility of the bidder; and the Government makes no representation in regard to zoning matters. Any inaccuracies or changes in the zoning information shall NOT be cause for adjustment or rescission of any contract resulting from this IFB.
For more information contact:
Alyson Hunter
Senior Planner
City of Pacific Grove, Community Development Department IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 5 of 32
831-648-3127
[email protected]
https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/living/community-development/planning
7. CALIFORNIA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT (CZMA)- Local Coastal Program (LCP) The subject property is located within the California Coastal Zone. Future development is governed by provisions of the Pacific Grove’s Local Coastal Program (LCP). The City of Pacific Grove Land Use Plan and Implementing Ordinances, Certified by California Coastal Commission on March 11, 2020, can be found at the City of Pacific Grove official website: https://www.cityofpacificgrove.org/living/community-development/planning/local-coastal-program
8. RISK OF LOSS
As of the date of conveyance, the Purchaser shall assume all responsibility for care and handling and all risks of loss or damage to the Property, including but not limited to all buildings and other improvements located thereon, and assume all obligations and liabilities of ownership and no claim for any allowance or deduction upon such grounds will be considered after the conclusion of an auction.
9. TAXES, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER COSTS
As of the date of conveyance, the Purchaser shall assume responsibility for all general and special real and personal property taxes or other assessments which have been or may be assessed on the Property, and for all sums due to be paid by the Government in lieu of taxes, which amount shall be prorated.
10. REVOCATION OF BID AND DEFAULT
Purchaser agrees that bids made to purchase the Property are binding offers and once accepted for contract by the Government, all deposits made by the Purchaser to register for the sale, subject to this Invitation for Bids, become Earnest Money to the benefit, custody and accountability of the Government.
In the event of (1) revocation of a bid after the conclusion of an auction, but prior to acceptance of the high bid by the Government, or (2) in the event of revocation of a bid after notice of acceptance, or (3) in the event of any default by the Purchaser in the performance of the contract of sale created by such acceptance, or (4) in the event of failure by the Purchaser to consummate the transaction, the Purchaser agrees that any Earnest Money and all deposits paid to the Government in any acceptable form, including credit card, together with any payments subsequently made on account, are subject to forfeit by the Purchaser to the Government at the option of the Government as damages for breach of contract, in which event the Purchaser shall be relieved from further liability.
Purchaser agrees that all deposits made with credit cards are subject to forfeit upon Government determination of Purchaser’s default and breach of contract. Purchaser shall not request retrieval, chargeback or any other cardholder refund.
Purchaser agrees and understands that a debt to the United States of America subject to claim or collection by applicable Federal law may be created if their Earnest Money is in any way made unavailable to the Government and that any party that knowingly participates in such retrieval or refund may be held fully accountable for interfering with a Government contract.
11. GOVERNMENT LIABILITY
If the Government accepts a bid for the purchase of the Property and (1) the Government fails for any reason to perform its obligations as set forth herein; or (2) title does not transfer or vest in the Purchaser for any reason, although Purchaser is ready, willing, and able to close; or (3) any other contractual claim or cause of action hereafter accrues in favor of Purchaser under the terms of this IFB, Government’s liability to Purchaser shall be strictly limited to all amounts of money Purchaser has paid to Government without interest whereupon Government shall have no further liability to Purchaser.
12. TITLE EVIDENCE
Any bidder, at its sole cost and expense, may procure any title evidence that the said bidder desires. The Government will, however, cooperate with the Purchaser or their authorized agent in this transaction, and will permit IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 6 of 32
examination and inspection of such deeds, abstracts, affidavits of title, judgments in condemnation proceedings, or other documents relating to the title of the premises and Property involved, as it may have available. It is understood and agreed that the Government is not obligated to pay for any expense incurred in connection with title matters or survey of the Property.
13. TITLE
If a bid for the purchase of the Property is accepted, a quitclaim deed or a deed without warranty in conformity with local law and practice will convey the Government's interest. The Government does not pay for or provide title insurance.
14. EASEMENTS, ENCROACHMENTS AND RESERVATIONS
The Property will be sold subject to any and all covenants, reservations, easements, restrictions, encroachments, and rights, recorded or unrecorded, in favor of third parties, for highways, streets, power lines, telephone lines and equipment, pipelines, drainage, sewer and water mains and lines, public utilities, public roads, railroads and other rights-of-way, and any easements, reservations, rights and covenants reserved by the Grantor herein.
15. COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES
The Purchaser warrants that he or she has not employed or retained any person or agency to solicit or secure this contract upon any agreement or understanding for commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee. Breach of this warranty shall give the Government the right to annul the contract without liability or in its discretion to recover from the Purchaser the amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee in addition to the consideration herewith set forth. This warranty shall not apply to commissions payable by the Purchaser upon the contract secured or made through bona fide established commercial agencies maintained by the Purchaser for the purpose of doing business. “Bona fide established commercial agencies” has been construed to include licensed real estate brokers engaged in the business generally.
16. CONTINUING OFFERS
Each bid received shall be deemed to be a continuing offer for forty-five (45) calendar days after the close of the online auction until the bid is accepted or rejected by the Government.
If the Government desires to accept any bid after the expiration of the forty-five (45) calendar days, the consent of the bidder shall be obtained prior to such acceptance.
17. TENDER OF PAYMENT AND DELIVERY OF INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE Prior to closing, the Purchaser or Purchaser’s agent must open an escrow account with an independent, unaffiliated escrow company (“Escrow Holder”) to handle the closing. All closing costs, including escrow fees and document handling expenses, shall be borne solely by the Purchaser. As part of the closing, the Government will provide escrow instructions to the Escrow Holder regarding the recording, disposition of proceeds and related matters.
The closing date of the sale is sixty (60) calendar days after acceptance of the bid. Upon written agreement by the Government, the Purchaser may close the transaction prior to the sixty (60) calendar day period.
On the closing date, the Purchaser shall tender to the Government (or to the Purchaser’s Escrow Holder) the balance of the purchase price in the form of a cashier’s check, certified check or electronic wire transfer. Upon confirmation that Purchaser’s wire transferred funds have been received by the Government or that Purchaser’s funds by check have been confirmed to the satisfaction of the Government, (the Purchaser’s Escrow Holder shall record the instrument, or instruments, of conveyance and provide copies of the recorded instrument(s) to the parties) the Government shall deliver the instrument, or instruments, of conveyance to the Purchaser’s Escrow Holder for recordation. Possession of the Property will be assumed by the Purchaser at the time of closing. The Government reserves the right to extend the closing date for a reasonable amount of time.
18. DELAYED CLOSING
Any change to the established closing date is subject to the written approval by the Government. The Government reserves the right to refuse a request for extension of closing. However, if the Government grants an extension, the Purchaser may be required to pay either: (i) a liquidated damages assessment of $200.00 per day; or (ii) interest IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 7 of 32
on the outstanding balance of the purchase price, whichever is greater, if the closing of the sale is delayed, and the delay is caused, directly or indirectly, by the Purchaser's action or inaction and not by any action on the part of the Government. The interest rate shall be computed based on the yield of 10-year United States Treasury maturities as reported by the Federal Reserve Board in "Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15" plus 1-1/2% rounded to the nearest one-eighth percent (1/8%) as of the date of bid acceptance. The Government may impose additional terms and conditions to grant an extension.
19. CLOSING COSTS, DOCUMENTARY STAMPS AND COST OF RECORDING All closing costs, including escrow and financing fees, shall be borne solely by the Purchaser. The Purchaser shall pay all taxes and fees imposed on this transaction and shall obtain at Purchaser’s own expense and affix to all instruments of conveyance and security documents such revenue and documentary stamps as may be required by Federal, state and local law.
All instruments of conveyance and security documents shall be placed on record in the manner prescribed by local recording statutes at the Purchaser’s expense.
Within five (5) business days from receipt of the executed deed, the Purchaser (or the Purchaser’s Escrow Holder) shall record the quitclaim deed in the official records of the county. The Purchaser (or the Purchaser’s Escrow Holder) shall provide GSA a conformed copy of the recorded quitclaim deed within five (5) business days of recording to the following e-mail address: [email protected].
20. OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT
No member or delegate to the Congress, resident commissioner or Government official shall be admitted to any share or part of the contract of sale or to any benefit that may arise therefrom, but this provision shall not be construed to extend to the contract of sale if made with a corporation for its general benefit. GSA and (insert landholding agency, if applicable and verified) employees are prohibited from bidding on the Property offered in the IFB.
20. CAPACITY TO CONTRACT
Bidders must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract in order to bid and acquire the Property.
21. ANTITRUST LAWS
The contract made by the acceptance of bid by the Government may be transmitted to the Attorney General of the United States for advice as to whether the sale would tend to create or maintain a situation inconsistent with anti-trust laws. The Government may rescind the acceptance of any bid, in case unfavorable advice is received from the Attorney General, without liability on the part of the Government other than to return any and all deposits held by the Government without interest.
22. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 889 PART B
By signature of the Bidder Registration and Bid Form, bidders hereby certify that their entity is in compliance with Section 889, Prohibition of Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment of the Fiscal Year 2019 National Defense Authorization Act (Pub. L. 115- 232). The bidder represents that it does not use covered telecommunications equipment or services, or use any equipment, system or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services. The statute prohibits contracting with an entity that uses certain telecommunications equipment or services produced by the below entities, companies, affiliates or subsidiaries:
● Huawei Technologies Company
● ZTE Corporation
● Hytera Communications Corporation
● Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company
● Dahua Technology Company
The prohibition of use of these telecommunications equipment or services applies regardless of whether or not that usage is related to the terms and conditions of this IFB and the certification extends until closing of the transaction as specified herein.
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 8 of 32
23. ARTIST RIGHTS IN MURAL
In 2008, the landholding agency commissioned artwork in the form of a mural that currently covers a significant portion of the exterior of the building. The artist retained copyright in this artwork, and may have additional rights under the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (VARA) and/or other authorities. It does not appear that the mural can be removed from the building without causing destruction, distortion, mutilation, or other modification to the mural.
As stated in the Offer to Waive Rights attached, the artist has offered the purchaser, its successors and assigns, that the artist will waive any rights he may have to prevent complete destruction of the artwork--including but not limited to painting over the entirety of the artwork, or partial or full demolition of the building that results in complete destruction of the artwork--in exchange for being provided 90 days advance written notice prior to any destruction of the artwork. The artist wishes to ensure that the artwork is not otherwise intentionally altered, distorted, mutilated, or modified without his prior written consent. The United States makes no warranties or representations of any kind regarding the artist’s rights to prevent destruction of the artwork. In addition, the United States is not a party to, and has no rights, obligations, or interests in, any private agreement formed between the artist and the purchaser of the building. See “Attachment 2” for more information.
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 9 of 32
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
1. AUCTION START DATE
The auction opens on 31, January 2022 at 11:00 a.m. (Central Time).
2. TYPE OF SALE
This sale will be an online auction conducted at RealEstateSales.gov. The auction will be conducted over a period of time, usually several weeks, as determined by bid activity. The date of the auction close (see Paragraph 10, Auction Close) will be announced at RealEstateSales.gov, with at least three business days prior notice. The auction may continue beyond that date as long as bidders continue to submit higher bids. Thus, the bidders determine when the sale closes by their bidding activity.
3. BIDS AND TERMS OF SALE
Bids to purchase must be ALL-CASH. Buyers are expected to arrange their own financing and to pay the balance in full by the closing date. No Government credit terms are available. GSA has no information on the availability of private financing or on the suitability of this Property for financing.
4. STARTING BID
This auction is being opened with an amount which does not represent the value of the Property but rather provides a reasonable starting point for the online auction. The starting bid will be displayed as the Current Bid. The Government seeks to obtain fair market value for the Property and reserves the right to reject any and all bids.
5. BIDDER REGISTRATION AND DEPOSIT
a. Bidder registration is a three-step process:
(1) Complete Online Registration: Bidders must register online at RealEstateSales.gov. Click on “Register”, establish a Username and Password and provide the requested account information including a valid email address. A Username and Password are used to register online and to place bids. The required password must be between six and fifteen characters. You will be asked to read and agree to the terms and conditions of the Website. GSA reserves the right to change the online terms and conditions. A previously registered bidder of GSAAuctions.gov can login using the established Username and Password. In the event you forget your Username or Password, or both, or are locked out from the system, it is your responsibility to obtain your Username and Password from RealEstateSales.gov.
GSA staff cannot assist in retrieving a lost or forgotten Username or Password.
GSAAuctions.gov has implemented Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for access to RealEstateSales.gov. Every user must register their User ID information if they have not yet set up their MFA. Once registered, you may log in using your email and password and a numeric verification code.
This verification code is delivered to you by one of the delivery methods you chose during your registration process. For additional information on MFA, please review the GSAAuctions.gov FAQ page.
You may register as either an individual or as a company and this information must be the same information provided on the Bidder Registration and Bid Form for Purchase of Government Real Property. Changes to title may be considered after bid acceptance at the discretion of the Government.
If you wish to participate as an individual and a representative of a company, you must register separately for each and place bids accordingly.
In accordance with Public Law No. 104-134, Section 31001, the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, the Tax Identification Number (TIN) must be provided by anyone conducting business with the Federal Government, from which a debt to the Government may arise. Individuals cannot successfully register to bid on items without providing a TIN. A TIN is defined as an individual's Social Security Number (SSN) or business entity's Employer Identification Number (EIN). If you registered as an Individual, your SSN will be validated with your name and address. If you registered as a Company, your business identity's EIN will be validated with your company name and address. The use of an IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 10 of 32
individual's SSN is subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. Section 552a), and will be collected to verify the data submitted by the user.
An authentication process will be conducted to confirm the identity of individuals and companies to prevent potential fraudulent bidding activity and to ensure that bidders are prepared to accept responsibility for their bidding activity and all submitted bids are valid. The identity and credit card information you provide at registration is used strictly for authentication purposes. GSA Auctions® does not automatically charge credit cards on file. You may use a different credit card to provide the required Registration Deposit. Credit card registration deposits for real property sales cannot be made via GSA Auctions®.
For more information and assistance on the online registration process, please go to https://realestatesales.gov/html/static/faq.htm.
(2) Complete Registration Form: Bidders must complete and submit the official Bid Form titled "Bidder Registration and Bid Form for Purchase of Government Real Property" accompanying this IFB. All information and certification requested thereon must be provided. Bidder registration and bids submitted which fail to furnish all information or certifications required may be summarily rejected. The Bid Form should be filled out legibly with all erasures, strikeovers and corrections initialed by the person signing the bid. The Bid Form must be signed and dated. Additional bid forms are available upon request or you may photocopy the form in this IFB.
(3) Provide Registration Deposit: A deposit in the amount of $75,000.00 (the “Registration Deposit”) must accompany your Bidder Registration and Bid Form. Registration Deposits must be provided in the form of a credit card (Visa, MasterCard, Discover or American Express). Bidders must also complete the Registration Deposit portion of the official Bid Form to be authorized to bid.
Only upon verification of your Registration Deposit, will you be allowed to bid. All Registration Deposits received will be deposited with the U.S. Treasury, in a non-interest bearing account, immediately upon receipt.
b. To complete the bidder registration process, please submit the completed Bidder Registration and Bid Form for Purchase of Government Real Property, along with the required Registration Deposit to GSA:
Email: [email protected]
or
Fax: 415-522-1650
c. It is the responsibility of the bidder to ensure that adequate time is available to complete the registration process as described above. The identity authentication process, if unsuccessful, may require a bidder to provide additional information by email for manual verification and may take several business days to complete. Bidders may receive a registration failure notice from [email protected]. Bidders will need to reply and provide the necessary documentation to be reviewed which may take up to 24-48 hours to validate and approve. The Government makes no representation or guarantee that any additional assistance or time will be provided to complete the registration process. No bidder will be allowed to participate in the sale until the entire registration process is complete. d. Registration may occur any time prior to the conclusion of the auction. The Government, however, makes no representation or guarantee that your registration will be completed prior to the announced date and time for the receipt of final bids. Therefore, bidders are encouraged to register before the auction opens.
6. BIDDING IN GENERAL
a. Registered bidders may bid online by following the instructions at RealEstateSales.gov. By submitting your bid through RealEstateSales.gov, you agree that your bid is a binding offer. You will be legally obligated for any and all bids submitted using your Username and password.
After successful completion of the registration process, users, also known as "Bidders," are permitted to participate in online auctions. The Bidder Menu provides you with the capability to browse and place bids; IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 11 of 32
track items of interest; follow auctions where bids have been placed; to change your personal information and settings; and to access an easy-to-use online Help Menu.
GSA Auctions® provides up-to-date information on your bidding status. You can check the bidding status by clicking on the Bid History.
b. Bids received through RealEstateSales.gov are date and time stamped Central Time. The Government will not be responsible for any discrepancies between the time indicated on the Website and the apparent time indicated, displayed, or otherwise stated or represented by a registered bidder. c. Bids must be submitted without contingencies.
d. Bidders that are currently in default status on GSA Auctions®, for non-payment or non-removal of items, will not be allowed to place bids for real property. They will only be allowed to "browse" the items. Once a bidder cures their default, they will be unblocked and be given access to begin bidding on items upon receipt of the required Registration Deposit. For more information, review the GSA Auctions® Terms and Conditions.
7. CONTINUOUS BIDDING RESULTS AND AUCTION INFORMATION
Bidders are strongly encouraged to monitor bidding activity at RealEstateSales.gov. Bidders may also review bid activity by clicking on the “My Messages” tab once logged in. New bids are immediately posted at RealEstateSales.gov upon receipt. If you no longer have the high bid and the sale has not closed, you can go back to the item and place another bid. Bids cannot be lowered or canceled.
If your bid is not accurately shown on RealEstateSales.gov, then you should call GSA at (415) 734-8367 or (415) 813-9862. Bidders are urged to pay close attention to RealEstateSales.gov which will contain new, revised, and useful information regarding the high bid, modification to bid increment and the closing date of the auction that is subject to change. Bidder agrees and accepts that notices of any changes to the terms and conditions of sale or instructions to bidders is satisfactory when made available on either or both of GSA’s real property disposal websites at RealEstateSales.gov and/or disposal.gsa.gov.
8. ONLINE BIDDING
RealEstateSales.gov allows you to place either a flat or automatic (“proxy”) bid. A flat bid is for an amount at least the current bid plus the posted minimum Bid Increment. If the bid is greater than another bidder’s automatic bid, the system will consider this flat bid as the current (winning) bid. If the bid is less than or equal to another bidder’s automatic bid, the system will record the bid but it will not be considered the current (winning) bid. The required minimum bid will be specified on the bid screen and once entered it will be displayed as the winning bid unless an automatic bid that is greater than this amount has been placed.
An automatic bid is an amount that you set above the posted minimum bid. Realestatesales.gov will use as much of your bid as needed to make you the current winner of the auction or to meet the auction’s reserve price. The system will automatically apply the minimum Bid Increment up to the total amount bid to make you the current winner of the auction or to meet the auction's reserve price. Your automatic bid amount is not shown to other bidders until it is reached through competitive bidding. You may change your bid amount but not less than the next bid increment amount. If the system reaches your automatic bid limit, it stops bidding for you. Submit another bid if you want to continue bidding. If you selected to receive e-mail notifications during registration, the system will notify you if you are no longer holding the winning bid. You can submit another flat bid or reset your automatic bid amount if you want to continue bidding. Your automatic bid is not shown to other bidders. If a reserve price is set, RealEstateSales.gov will use as much of your bid as needed to meet the reserve price.
When two automatic bids compete, the greater of the two always wins. If the greater automatic limit does not exceed the lesser automatic limit by the full stated Bid Increment, then the greater automatic limit bid is placed. You may increase or decrease your automatic bid limit at any time. You cannot decrease your automatic bid below the current bid. If you are currently the winner in an auction, increasing your automatic bid will not increase your current bid until challenged by another bid. Changing your automatic bid may affect the indicated time remaining.
If you learn from RealEstateSales.gov that your bid was not the high bid, or if another bidder exceeds your previous high bid, you may increase your bid at RealEstateSales.gov until such time as bidding is closed. Increases in IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 12 of 32
previously submitted bids are welcome and your Registration Deposit will apply to subsequent increased bids. All increased bids must be made online. The Government reserves the right to modify the Bid Increment at any time prior to the close of the auction.
9. TRANSMISSION AND RECEIPT OF BIDS
The Government will not be responsible for any failure attributable to the inability of the bidder to transmit or the Government to receive registration information, bid forms or a bid by any method. Failure to receive registration information, bid forms or a bid may include, but is not limited to the following:
a. Receipt of a garbled or incomplete bid.
b. Availability or condition of the sending or receiving electronic equipment. c. Incompatibility between the sending and receiving equipment and software. d. Malfunctioning of any network, computer hardware or software. e. Delay in transmission or receipt of a bid.
f. Failure of bidder to properly identify the bid.
g. Security of bid data.
h. Inability of bidder to enter bid. For example: due to lost or forgotten password or system lock due to repeated login failures.
i. Unavailability of GSA personnel.
If your bid is not accurately shown or you cannot enter a bid at RealEstateSales.gov then you should call GSA at (415) 734-8367 or (415) 813-9862 for assistance.
The Website will NOT be available during the following system maintenance windows:
● Saturday: 5:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. CT
● Sunday: 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. CT
Occasionally, technical problems will interrupt the bidding process for an unspecified amount of time. These interruptions may affect some or all bidders. In the event of an interruption, an evaluation of the length of interruption time and the numbers of bidders affected may prompt GSA Auctions℠ to extend the closing time for an auction.
Extension may range from 1 hour to 24 hours based on the aforementioned criteria, to ensure fair and full competition. An email notification will be sent to those bidders who participated in these auctions when they are extended.
10. CLOSE OF AUCTION
a. Posting of the Close of Auction. The Government will post on the Website the date and time on which the auction is anticipated to close (shown on the Website as “Close Time”). This posting is typically at least three (3) business days prior to the posted Close Time. The Website will also show the days, hours and minutes remaining until the Close Time (shown on the Website as “Time Remaining”). b. Inactivity Period and Closing of Auction. When the Close Time is posted, a twenty-four (24) hour inactivity period is established (shown on the Website as the “Inactivity Period”) and is posted under the “Bidding Details” tab of the Website. Note that the Website shows the Inactivity Period in minutes with 24 hours represented as 1440 minutes. In order for the Auction to close, the High Bid must remain unchanged for the Inactivity Period. Each time a new High Bid is received within the Inactivity Period or if the maximum amount that a Bidder is willing to pay for the Property under a proxy Bid is changed within the Inactivity Period, the Auction will automatically extend for an additional 24 hour Inactivity Period. The Time Remaining and Close Time will adjust accordingly. If the High Bid remains unchanged for the full Inactivity Period, the Auction will close.
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 13 of 32
c. Exceptions for Weekends and Holidays. Notwithstanding the foregoing, online auction sales cannot end on Weekends or Federal Holidays. Therefore, if the posted Inactivity Period extends into a Weekend or Federal Holiday, which the Website defines as the time between: (i) 12:00 am on Saturday until 11:59 pm on Sunday; or (ii) the 24-hour period between 12:00 am to 11:59 pm on any Federal Holiday, the Auction will automatically extend to the same time on the first business day following the Weekend or Federal Holiday. Examples are in the table below. Federal Holidays are listed here List of Federal Holidays.
Bid made on: New closing time
9 pm CT on Friday 9 pm CT on Monday
11:30 am CT on Saturday 11:30 am CT on Monday
4:40 pm CT on Sunday 4:40 pm CT on Monday
Bidders are responsible for monitoring the Website for the posting and any changes to the Close Time, the Inactivity Period, and the Time Remaining.
11. ACCEPTABLE BID
An acceptable bid is one received from a responsible bidder, whose bid, conforming to this IFB, will be most advantageous to the Government.
12. BID EXECUTED ON BEHALF OF BIDDER
A bid executed by an attorney or agent on behalf of the bidder shall be accompanied by an authenticated copy of their Power of Attorney or other evidence of their authority to act on behalf of the bidder.
If the bidder is a corporation, the Certificate of Corporate/Organization Bidder, included in this IFB, must be executed. The certificate must be executed under the corporate seal by some duly authorized officer of the corporation other than the officer signing the bid. In lieu of the Certificate of Corporate Bidder, there may be attached to the bid, copies of so much of the records of the corporation as will show the official character and authority of the officer signing, duly certified by the secretary or assistant secretary, under the corporate seal, to be true copies.
If the bidder is a partnership, and all partners sign the bid, with a notation that they are all general partners, the Government will not ordinarily require any further proof of the existence of the partnership. If all the partners do not sign the bid, then the names of all those except limited partners must be furnished on the bid form and the Government, in its discretion, may require evidence of the authority of the signer(s) to execute bids on behalf of the partnership. The name(s) and signature(s) of the designated bidder(s) must be included on the Bidder Registration and Bid Form.
If the bidder is a limited liability company, a certificate of the LLC must be completed and executed by the manager and submitted with the Bidder Registration Form. The Certificate of Corporate/Organization Bidder form may be used for this purpose.
13. NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION
Notice by the Government of acceptance or rejection of the bid shall be deemed to have been sufficiently given when faxed, mailed or e-mailed to the bidder or their duly authorized representative at the fax number physical address or e-mail address indicated on the Bid Form. The processing of a registration deposit by the Government shall not, in itself, constitute acceptance of the bidder's offer. The Government reserves the right to reject any or all bids or portions thereof for any reason.
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 14 of 32
14. AUCTION SUSPENSION OR CANCELLATION
The Government reserves the right to temporarily suspend or cancel the auction for any reason without accepting a bid and resume the auction or start a new auction at any time. In the event of a temporary suspension due to technical problems, or other bidding issues, the Government will determine the high bidder and the high bid amount; re-open bidding and allow the auction to proceed according to the bidding terms described herein. The Government reserves the right to cancel the sale at any time and Registration Deposits will be returned to bidders without interest or further obligation by the Government.
15. INCREASE OF EARNEST MONEY AND TRANSACTION CLOSING
Within three (3) business days of acceptance of a bid by the Government, the Purchaser agrees to deposit Earnest Money in the form of a wired funds transfer, equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the total bid in addition to any prior credit card deposits. Failure to provide these funds will result in a default and forfeiture of the Registration Deposit. Upon receipt of the Earnest Money deposit, applicable credit card registration deposits may be refunded.
Upon written acceptance of a bid, the Earnest Money shall be applied towards payment of the Purchaser's obligation to the Government. The full balance of the purchase price in the form of a certified check, cashier’s check or electronic wire transfer is payable within sixty (60) calendar days after acceptance of bid. At the time of closing, all monies paid by the Purchaser will be credited, without interest, toward the total purchase price.
16. REFUND OF REGISTRATION DEPOSITS
Registration Deposits accompanying bids that are rejected will be refunded to bidders without interest. Bidders who provided Registration Deposits by check will receive their check by mail. Refunds will only be processed to the same individual or entity identified on the Bidder Registration and Bid Form for Purchase of Government Real Property. Registration Deposits provided by credit card will be credited to the same account number provided.
Registration Deposits received from the second highest bidder will be held as stipulated in Paragraph 17, Backup Bidder. All other Registration Deposits will be processed for refunds after the last day of the auction or upon written request to withdraw from the auction unless the bidder is the first or second highest bidder. Return of registration deposits by check will be processed in a timely manner but may require several days before the deposit is returned.
Refunds to a credit card will usually be processed within three business days.
17. BACKUP BIDDER
The second-highest bidder will be the Backup Bidder. The bid of the Backup Bidder may be considered for acceptance for the duration of Continuing Offer period described in Terms of Sale, Paragraph 16, Continuing Offers, if: 1) the original High Bidder is unable to fully complete the transaction according to the terms and conditions of the IFB; or 2) if the original High Bidder fails to provide the required 10% of the purchase price as Earnest Money. The Bidder identified as the Backup Bidder agrees that their Bid remains a bona fide offer with which their Registration Deposit may be retained without interest, until the High Bidder provides the 10% Earnest Money or completes the transaction or both, at the Government’s discretion. During the Continuing Offer period, the Bidder identified as the Backup Bidder agrees that they will not request retrieval, chargeback or any other cardholder refund and understands that a debt to the United States of America may be created if their deposits are in any way unavailable to the Government to which any party that participates in such chargeback or refund may be held accountable as provided in Terms of Sale, Paragraph 10, Revocation of Bid and Default. When the Backup Bidder is converted to the High Bidder, all terms, conditions and agreements described in the IFB are applicable to the successful bidder.
The Registration Deposit of the Backup Bidder will be returned as described in Paragraph 16, Refund of Registration Deposits, if the Backup Bidder is not converted to the High Bidder. In the event that the Government is unable to complete the transaction with the highest or backup bidder, the Government reserves the right to consider the remaining bid(s) and accept a bid that is in the best interest of the Government.
18. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
GSA will provide additional copies of this IFB and make every effort to answer requests for additional information concerning the Property to facilitate preparation of bids. Each bid shall be deemed to have been made with full knowledge of all terms, conditions, and requirements contained in this IFB and any amendments made thereto prior IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 15 of 32
to bid acceptance. Bidders may also review the information pertaining to the Property at https://propertydisposal.gsa.gov or RealEstateSales.gov.
19. WAIVER OF INFORMALITIES OR IRREGULARITIES
The Government may, at its election, waive any minor informality or irregularity in bids received.
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 16 of 32
NOTICES AND COVENANTS
1. ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER DOCUMENTATION
The Government has the following reports for informational purposes only and are available under “Additional Documents” at RealEstateSales.gov.
● Asbestos, Lead and Hazardous Materials Inspection Report, Dated June 2015 ● Asbestos Supplemental, Dated May 2015
● Facility Condition Survey, Dated September 1999
● Lead-Based Paint Supplemental, Dated May 2015
● Navy BRAC Cleanup Plan, Dated March 1994
● Navy Environmental Baseline Survey, Dated December 1994
2. AS-IS, WHERE-IS PROVISION
The Property is offered for sale “AS IS” AND “WHERE IS” without representation or warranty, expressed or implied.
An “As Is, Where Is” provision will be included in the Quitclaim Deed in substantially the same form and is provided in Attachment 1- Sample Quitclaim Deed.
3. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE NOTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 120(h)(3) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §9620(h)(3), the United States gives notice that no hazardous substances have been released or disposed of or stored for one year or more on the Property. The requisite CERCLA notices and covenant will be included in the Quitclaim Deed in substantially the same form and is provided in Attachment 1 - Sample Quitclaim Deed.
4. NOTICE OF POTENTIAL PRESENCE OF ASBESTOS
The Government informs the Purchaser, and the Purchaser acknowledges that asbestos and/or asbestos containing materials (ACM) may contain and are otherwise presumed to exist in buildings, utilities, and structures on the Property. A Notice will be included as set forth in Attachment 1 - Sample Quitclaim Deed.
5. NOTICE OF POTENTIAL PRESENCE OF LEAD-BASED PAINT (LBP) Notice of the presence of lead-based paint will be included in the Quitclaim Deed and is provided in Attachment 1 – Sample Quitclaim Deed.
6. FLOODPLAIN
This property is not located in an area of minimal flood hazard. The subject property is located in Zone X, which is determined to be outside the 500‐year flood and protected by levee from 100‐year flood. This statement is based on a search of reporting landholding agency records and/or consultation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
7. CZMA
The Property is located within the California Coastal Zone. A Coastal Zone Notice and Covenant will be included in the Quitclaim Deed and is provided in Attachment 1- Sample Quitclaim Deed. Purchaser agrees to extend, as necessary, the continuing offer period described in Paragraph 15 of the General Terms of Sale for a reasonable amount of time in order for Seller to secure a consistency determination from the State of California, pursuant to section 307(c)(1) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and 15 CFR 930.35, to ensure that transfer of fee title to Purchaser will not result in any adverse impacts on the natural resources, land uses, or water uses in the coastal zone.
8. ARCHEOLOGY COVENANT
The Property is subject to an Archeology covenant that will be included in the Quitclaim Deed and is provided in Attachment 1- Sample Quitclaim Deed.
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 17 of 32
BIDDER REGISTRATION AND BID FORM FOR PURCHASE OF
GOVERNMENT REAL PROPERTY
USERNAME: ______________________________
(as established at RealEstateSales.gov)
Bidder Information: Please print or type legibly.
Name: __________________________________________________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________________________________________________ City: _____________________________________ State: ________________ Zip: _____________________ Phone: (______)___________________________ Fax: (______)____________________________________ E-mail: __________________________________________________________________________________ BIDDER REPRESENTS THAT HE/SHE OPERATES AS (check which applies) see Instructions to Bidders, Paragraph 12, Bid Executed on Behalf of Bidder for instructions:
□ An individual
□ A partnership consisting of
□ A trustee, acting for
THE FOLLOWING MUST PROVIDE THEIR CERTIFICATE OF CORPORATE/ORGANIZATION BIDDER – SEE NEXT PAGE □ A limited liability partnership consisting of
□ A corporation, incorporated in the State of
□ A limited liability company
□ Other
Registration Deposit (check one):
⚪ By Credit/Debit Card: __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Exp: ___/___ CSC/CVC ___ ___ ___ Name of Bidder as it appears on credit card: ______________________________________________ Certification and Authorization
Send Registration Form with Registration Deposit to:
[email protected] or FAX: (415) 522-1650
□ Visa
□ Discover
□ MasterCard
□ American Express
□ Debit
Azul Bay
1352 Lighthouse Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
IFB #: SFRAN922173201
REGISTRATION DEPOSIT: $75,000.00
The undersigned bidder hereby offers and agrees to purchase the Property as described in the accompanying Invitation for Bids (IFB) for any bids placed online by the undersigned and if any bid is accepted by the Government within forty-five (45) calendar days after the auction close date. This Bid Form is made subject to the terms of IFB No. SFRAN922173201 including the Property Description, Terms of Sale, Instructions to Bidders, Special Terms of Sale, Notices and Covenants, Bidder Registration and Bid Form For Purchase of Government Real Property, Lease, Historic Preservation Memorandum of Agreement, and any associated amendments to the IFB, all of which are incorporated herein and by reference made a part of any bid placed online at RealEstateSales.gov. If a bidder is providing the Registration Deposit by credit card, the bidder must be the authorized cardholder and agrees that his or her credit card account will be debited the full amount of the Registration Deposit, as specified in the IFB. In the event the bidder is not the Purchaser, the Registration Deposits will only be refunded as specified in the IFB. Information collected herein is governed by the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. Section 552a) and is being collected to register a bidder for the sale of Government property.
Signature: ____________________________________ Date: ___________________________ IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 18 of 32
CERTIFICATE OF CORPORATE/ORGANIZATION BIDDER
(For use with Bidder Registration and Bid Form for Purchase of Government Real Property see Instructions to Bidders, Paragraph 12, Bid Executed On Behalf Of Bidder for instructions) Azul Bay
1352 Lighthouse Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED BY SOMEONE OTHER THAN THE BIDDER (UNLESS THE BIDDER IS THE SOLE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CORPORATION/ORGANIZATION).
I, _______________________________, certify that I am _____________________________________ (Secretary or Other Title)
of the Corporation/Organization named as bidder herein; that ___________________________________ (Name of Authorized Representative)
who signed this Bid Form for Purchase of Government Property on behalf of the bidder was then ________________________________________ of said Corporation/Organization; that said bid was (Official Title)
duly signed for and on behalf of said Corporation/Organization by authority of its governing body and is within the scope of its corporate/organization powers.
__________________________________
(Signature of Certifying Officer/Manager)
(Corporate Seal Here, if applicable)
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 19 of 32
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
U.S. General Services Administration
50 United Nations Plaza
Room 4345, Mail Box 9
San Francisco, CA 94102
WHEN RECORDED, MAIL DOCUMENT
AND TAX STATEMENT TO:
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE
QUITCLAIM DEED
Monterey County, California
THIS INDENTURE, made this ________ day of __________________ , 2021, by and between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting by and through the Administrator of General Services, (herein referred to as "GRANTOR"), under and pursuant to the powers and authority contained in the provisions of Public Law 114-287, the Federal Assets Sale & Transfer Act of 2016 (FASTA) and Title 40 U.S. Code, Chapter 5, et seq., as amended, and regulations and orders promulgated thereunder, and ____________________, (herein referred to as “GRANTEE”).
NOWTHEREFORE, the GRANTOR, for consideration of ___________________________($X,XXX,XXX.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and by these presents does hereby remise, release, and quitclaim to the GRANTEE, and to its successors and assigns, all of its right, title and interest in all of that certain real property (herein referred to as “PROPERTY”), more commonly known as Azul Bay located at 1352 Lighthouse Avenue, City of Pacific Grove, Monterey County, State of California with Assessor’s Parcel Number 007-011-005, more particularly described in Exhibit “A” - Legal Description, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
THE CONVEYANCE IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING:
1. GRANTEE covenants and agrees that the conveyance is subject any and all existing covenants, conditions, reservations, easements, restrictions, right-of-way, rights, agreement, encumbrances, recorded or unrecorded, and to the reservations, rights and covenants set forth herein.
2. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE NOTIFICATION
A. NOTICE OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE ACTIVITY. Pursuant to 40 CFR 373.2 and Section 120(h)(3)(A)(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA)(42 U.S.C.§9620(h)(3)(A)(i)), and based upon a complete research of agency files, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA gives notice that no hazardous substances have been released or disposed or stored for one year or more on the PROPERTY.
Attachment 1- Sample Quitclaim Deed
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 20 of 32
B. CERCLA COVENANT. GRANTOR warrants that all remedial action necessary to protect human and health and the environment has been taken before the date of this conveyance. GRANTOR warrants that it shall take any additional response action found to be necessary after the date of this conveyance regarding hazardous substances located on the PROPERTY on the date of this conveyance.
(1) This covenant shall not apply:
(a) any a case in which GRANTEE, its successor(s) or assign(s), or any successor in interest to the PROPERTY or part thereof is a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) with respect to the PROPERTY immediately prior to the date of this conveyance; OR (b) to the extent that such additional response action or part thereof found to be necessary is the result of an act or failure to act of the GRANTEE, its successor(s) or assign(s), or any party in possession after the date of this conveyance that either:
(i) results in a release or threatened release of a hazardous substance that was not located on the PROPERTY on the date of this conveyance; or (ii) causes or exacerbates the release or threatened release of a hazardous substance the existence and location of which was known and identified to the applicable regulatory authority as of the date of this conveyance. (2) In the event GRANTEE, its successor(s), or assign(s), seek to have GRANTOR conduct any additional response action, and, as a condition precedent to GRANTOR incurring any additional cleanup obligation or related expenses, the GRANTEE, its successor(s), or assign(s), shall provide GRANTOR at least 45 days written notice of such a claim. In order for that 45- day period commence, such notice must include credible evidence that:
(a) The associated contamination existed prior to the date of this conveyance; and (b) The need to conduct any additional response action or part thereof was not the result of any act or failure to act by the GRANTEE, its successor(s) or assign(s), or any party possession.
C. ACCESS RESERVATION. GRANTOR reserves a right of access to all portions of the PROPERTY, for purposes of environmental investigation, remediation, or other corrective action. This reservation includes the right of access to and use of available utilities at reasonable cost to GRANTOR. These rights shall be exercisable in any case in which a remedial action, response action or corrective action is found to be necessary after the date of this conveyance, or in which access is necessary to carry out a remedial action, response action, or corrective action on adjoining PROPERTY.
Pursuant to this reservation, the United States of America, and its respective officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors shall have the right (upon reasonable advance written notice to the record title owner) to enter upon the PROPERTY and conduct investigations and surveys, to include drilling, test-pitting, borings, data and records compilation and other activities related to environmental investigation, and to carry out remedial or removal actions as required or necessary, including but not limited to the installation and operation of monitoring wells, pumping wells, and treatment facilities. Any such entry, including such activities, responses, or remedial actions, shall be coordinated with the record title owner, and shall be performed in a manner that minimizes interruption with activities of authorized occupants.
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 21 of 32
3. AS-IS, WHERE IS PROVISION
(a) GRANTEE agrees and acknowledges that GRANTOR is selling the PROPERTY strictly on an “as is, where is”, with all faults basis, without warranty, express or implied, with any and all latent and patent defects. GRANTEE acknowledges that GRANTOR has made the PROPERTY available for inspection by GRANTEE and GRANTEE’s representatives. GRANTEE has inspected, or will have inspected prior to closing, the physical condition of the PROPERTY to the extent felt necessary by GRANTEE, including all improvements thereon, and accepts title to the same “as is” in its existing physical condition. GRANTEE acknowledges that it is not relying upon any representation, warranty statement or other assertion of the United States of America, as GRANTOR, including its agencies or any official, agent representative or employee of the foregoing, with respect to the PROPERTY’s conditions. except as set forth in the contract, GRANTEE is relying solely and wholly on GRANTEE’s own examination of the PROPERTY, is fully satisfied with the PROPERTY, and accepts any liabilities or costs arising in connection with the condition of the PROPERTY, including, but not limited to any costs or liabilities pertaining to any environmental condition on the PROPERTY. Except as set forth in Section C, below, the United States of America and its agencies disclaim any and all express or implied warranties and specifically make no warranties of title, habitability, merchantability, suitability, fitness for any purpose, or any other warranty whatsoever. GRANTEE is put on notice that any prior grant and/or encumbrance may be of record and GRANTEE is advised to examine all public records available regarding the PROPERTY. (b) No employee or agent of GRANTOR is authorized to make any representation or warranty as to the quality or condition of the PROPERTY, merchantability, suitability or fitness of the PROPERTY for any use whatsoever, known or unknown to GRANTOR, or compliance with any environmental protection, pollution or land use laws, rules, regulations, orders, or requirements including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the handling, generating, treating, storing, or disposing of any hazardous waste or substance. In no event shall GRANTOR be responsible or liable for latent or patent defects or faults, if any, in the PROPERTY or for remedying or repairing the same including, without limitation, defects related to asbestos or asbestos containing materials, lead, lead-based paint, underground storage tanks, mold, radon or hazardous or toxic materials, chemicals or waste, or for constructing or repairing any streets, utilities or other improvements shown on any plat of the PROPERTY.
(c) Nothing in this “as is, where is” provision will be construed to modify or negate the GRANTOR’s obligation under the CERCLA covenant or any other statutory obligations.
4. NOTICE OF THE POTENTIAL PRESENCE OF ASBESTOS
(a) The GRANTEE is advised that the PROPERTY may contain asbestos-containing materials.
Unprotected or unregulated exposures to asbestos in product manufacturing, shipyard, and building construction workplaces have been associated with asbestos-related diseases. Both the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulate asbestos because of the potential hazards associated with exposure to airborne asbestos fibers. Both OSHA and EPA have determined that such exposure increases the risk of asbestos- related diseases, which include certain cancers, and which can result in disability or death.
(b) GRANTEE is invited, urged, and cautioned to inspect the PROPERTY as to its asbestos content and condition and any hazardous or environmental conditions relating thereto prior to conveyance.
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 22 of 32
The GRANTOR will assist GRANTEE in obtaining any authorization(s) which may be required in order to carry out any such inspection(s). GRANTEE shall be deemed to have relied solely on their own judgment in assessing the overall condition of all or any portion of the PROPERTY including, without limitation, any asbestos hazards, or concerns.
(c) No warranties either express or implied are given with regard to the condition of the PROPERTY including, without limitation, whether the PROPERTY does or does not contain asbestos or is or is not safe for a particular purpose. The failure of any bidder (offeror) to inspect, or to be fully informed as to the condition of all or any portion of the PROPERTY offered, will not constitute grounds for any claim or demand for adjustment or withdrawal of a bid or offer after its opening or tender.
(d) The description of the PROPERTY set forth in this conveyance document and any other information provided therein with respect to said PROPERTY is based on the best information available to the disposal agency and is believed to be correct, but an error or omission, including but not limited to the omission of any information available to the agency having custody over the PROPERTY or any other Federal agency, shall not constitute grounds or reason for nonperformance of the contract of sale, or any claim by the Purchaser against the Government including, without limitation, any claim for allowance, refund, or deduction from the purchase price.
(e) The GRANTOR assumes no liability for damages for personal injury, illness, disability or death, to the GRANTEE, or to the GRANTEE's successors, assigns, employees, invitees, licensees, or any other person subject to GRANTEE's control or direction, or to any other person, including members of the general public, arising from or incident to the purchase, transportation, removal, handling, use, disposition, or other activity causing or leading to contact of any kind whatsoever with asbestos on the PROPERTY which is the subject of this conveyance, whether the GRANTEE, its successors or assigns has or have properly warned or failed properly to warn the individual(s) injured.
(f) The GRANTEE further agrees that in its use and occupancy of the PROPERTY it will comply with all Federal, state, and local laws relating to asbestos.
5. NOTICE OF THE POTENTIAL PRESENCE OF LEAD-BASED PAINT FOR NONRESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 1978. GRANTEE is put on notice that the PROPERTY has buildings built prior to 1978 and is thereby notified that such PROPERTY may present exposure to lead from lead-based paint. Moreover, GRANTEE covenants and agrees, for itself and its assigns, that in its use and occupancy of the PROPERTY it will comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws relating to lead-based paint; and that GRANTOR assumes no liability for damages for personal injury, illness, disability or death to the GRANTEE, its successors or assigns, or any other person, including members of the general public, arising from or incident to the purchase, transportation, removal, handling, use, disposition, or other activity causing or leading to contact of any kind whatsoever with lead-based paint on the PROPERTY described in the Quitclaim Deed, whether GRANTEE, its successors or assigns has properly warned or failed to properly warn the individual(s) injured. GRANTEE further agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the GRANTOR from any and all loss, judgment, claims, demands, expenses or damages, of whatever nature which might arise or be made against the United States of America, due to, or relating to the presence of lead-based paint hazards on the PROPERTY; GRANTEE covenants and agrees that it will comply with all Federal, State, local, and any other applicable law(s) regarding the lead-based paint hazards with respect to the PROPERTY.
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 23 of 32
6. COASTAL ZONE NOTICE AND COVENANT The GRANTEE is advised that the subject PROPERTY is located within the California Coastal Zone. Future development is governed by the provisions of the California Coastal Zone Management Program and the Pacific Grove Local Coastal Program. GRANTEE must comply with the California Coastal Zone Management Program and the City of Pacific Grove Land Use Plan and Implementing Ordinance, Certified by California Coastal Commission on March 11, 2020 can be found at the City of Pacific Grove official website: www.cityofpacificgrove.org.
7. ARCHEOLOGY COVENANT Grantee hereby covenants on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, and on behalf of every successor in interest to the Property, or any part thereof, that the Property is hereby conveyed subject to the conditions, restrictions, and limitations hereinafter set forth which are covenants running with the land:
1. Any disturbance of the ground surface located on the Property shall be undertaken in accordance with the City of Pacific Grove Land Use Plan, Chapter 3.3 Cultural Resources, and the Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan §23.90.200 Cultural resources, as amended (EXHIBIT “X”).
2. Grantee, and its successors and assigns covenant and agree that in the event that any portion of the Property is sold or otherwise disposed of, covenants and restrictions in paragraphs 6 and 7 shall be inserted in the instrument(s) of conveyance.
3. The acceptance of the delivery of this deed shall constitute conclusive evidence of the agreement of Grantee to be bound by the conditions, restrictions and limitations, and to perform the obligations set forth above.
SAID PROPERTY transferred hereby, totaling approximately 4.28 +/- acres of land and improvements, was duly determined to be surplus to the needs and requirements of the United States of America, and was assigned to the General Services Administration for disposal contained in the provision of Public Law 114- 287, the Federal Assets Sale & Transfer Act of 2016 (FASTA) and Title 40 U.S. Code, Chapter 5, et seq., as amended, and regulations and orders promulgated thereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has caused this Quitclaim Deed to be executed in its name and on its behalf on this the _ day of ____, 2021.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Acting by and through the
ADMINISTRATOR OF GENERAL SERVICES
BY: ____________________________
DAVID HAASE
Director/Contracting Officer
Office of Real PROPERTY Utilization and Disposal
U.S. General Services Administration
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 24 of 32
CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
County of )
On ___________________, before me, _________________________________________, Date Name and Title of the Officer
personally appeared ________________________________________________________, Name(s) of Signer (s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
_______________________________
Signature of Notary Public (Notary Public Seal)
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 25 of 32
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
Exhibit A- Legal Description
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 26 of 32
'
)
FLEET NUMERICAL WEATHER FACILITY
POINT PINOS LIGHT STATION
MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DESCRIPTION
A parcel of land situate In the County of Monterey, California, said parcel being a portion of the United States Light Station Reserva-tion at Point Pinos acquired by the United States of America on December 18, 1901, by deed recorded in Volume 66 of Deeds at Page 385 in the Office of the Recorder, Monterey County, and the boundaries of said parcel being described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the easterly boundary of said Light Station Reservation distant thereon North 15*26' East, 116.05 feet from a 10 inch by 10 inch granite monument marking the southeasterly corner of said Reservation; thence along said easterly boundary
(1) North 15*26' East, 193.37 feet to a point in the line of over-hang of an existing chain link fence; thence along the line of overhang of said fence the following two courses
(2) North 74*29 * 33" West, 748.63 feet to an angle point; and (3) South 15*28'43" West, 250.39 feet to a point in the northerly line of that certain 60 feet wide highway right of way (commonly known as HUDSON WAY) leased to the County of Monterey, said point being 60 feet distant northerly at right angles from the southerly boundary of the aforesaid Reservation; thence along the northerly line of said right of way the following two courses
(4) South 74*34' East, parallel to and 60 feet distant northerly at right angles from the southerly boundary of the Reservation, 692.78 feet ‘
to a point of curvature; and
(5) Northeasterly, on the circumference of a circle the radius point of which bears North 15*26' East, 56.05 feet from the point of curvature, through a central angle of 90”, an arc distance of 88.04 feet (from the point of curvature the long chord bears North 60*26' East,
79.27 feet) to a point of tangency, the Point of Beginning.
Containing in said parcel 4.28 acres, more or less. The bearings used herein are referenced to the astronomic meridian as originally established by the United States Lighthouse Service, the bearing South 74*34' East of the Reservation's southerly boundary as shown on United States Coast Guard Drawing No. F-01-1, POINT PINOS LICHT STATION revised February, 1958, being accepted as the basis thereof.
r
‘
EXHIBIT “A"
11/10/21, 7:49 AM
https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/PacificGrove/#!/PacificGrove23/PacificGrove2390.html#23.90.200 1/2
23.90.200 Cultural resources.
(a) In order to protect the city’s archaeological and historic resources, and to maintain consistency with the LCP’s land use plan (LUP), development shall conform to all applicable LUP cultural resources policies and the following requirements.
(b) Applications for Development Potentially Affecting Cultural Resources. The following documentation and requirements shall be provided for all CDP applications that may impact cultural resources:
(1) Archaeological Report. Due to the archaeological sensitivity of the entire Pacific Grove Coastal Zone, an archaeological report for projects that include soil disturbance shall be prepared by a qualified archaeologist prior to approval of the project. Landscaping that does not involve construction of structures or changes to the site contours greater than one foot are exempt from this requirement. At a minimum, the archaeological report shall include the following:
(A) Site information including location, parcel number, address, owner, applicant, parcel size, location of structures or improvements, and applicable maps; (B) Review of relevant scientific literature or past archaeological reports describing archaeological resources on the site or on adjacent lands; (C) Searches of the California Historical Resources Information System and Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File;
(D) Documentation of consultation with appropriate tribes as required by state law; (E) Date and findings of a preliminary archaeological reconnaissance; (F) Discussion of potential adverse impacts on archaeological resources; (G) Recommendations for further archaeological surveys, if deemed to be necessary; and (H) Recommended mitigation, minimization, and/or avoidance measures to compensate for potential impacts to significant archaeological resources, including description of alternative designs for the proposed project (if any are proposed) and how alternative designs relate to the archaeological resources on the site and alternative design impacts compare to those of the project.
Chapter 23.90 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
EXHIBIT X
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 27 of 32
11/10/21, 7:49 AM Chapter 23.90 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/PacificGrove/#!/PacificGrove23/PacificGrove2390.html#23.90.200 2/2 (2) Historic Resources Report. For new projects that include demolition or alterations to potential historical resources, a historical assessment report prepared by a qualified professional is required prior to approval of the project. The lead author must meet the Secretary of the Interior’s professional qualifications standards (36 CFR Part 61) in history or architectural history. At a minimum, the historical assessment report shall include the following:
(A) Detailed description of the historical resources at the project site. (B) Discussion of potential adverse impacts on historical resources from the project. (C) Recommended mitigation, minimization, and/or avoidance measures to protect historical resources, including description of alternative designs for the proposed project (if any are proposed) and how alternative designs relate to the historical resources on the site and alternative design impacts compare to those of the project. [Ord. 20-023 § 2, 2020].
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 28 of 32
Attachment 2
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 29 of 32
Offer to Waive Rights
I, Ray Troll, am the creator of the mural entitled Blue Seas/Green Seas ("Work") that is physically attached to the exterior walls of the NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, 1352 Lighthouse Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA 93950 ("Property"). I retain copyright in the Work, and I wish to ensure that the artwork is not intentionally altered, distorted, mutilated, or modified without my prior written consent.
I hereby offer to the purchaser of the building, its successors and assigns, that I will waive any rights I may have to prevent complete destruction of the Work, either under the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (VARA) or otherwise, including but not limited to painting over the entirety of the artwork, or partial or full demolition of the building that results in complete destruction of the artwork, in exchange for being provided 90 days advance written notice prior to any destruction of the artwork. Such notice must be sent via certified mail to the following address:
Ray Troll
P.O. Box 8874
Ketchikan, AK 99901
Upon receipt of this notice, I offer, in good faith, to execute any necessary waiver documents for destruction of the artwork that may be required. This offer shall remain open unless expressly revoked in writing by me at a later date, and upon receipt by the purchaser of the building.
Executed by Ray Troll
Signature:
September 27, 2020 Date:
Attachment 3- Floor Plans
NMFS SWFSC BILDING
PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA
COMPLEX# 0CAW201
FLOOR PLAN LOWER LEVEL
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 30 of 32
r
t&’-e?
1 t
B ©
10 -fr -
I
,1
1?
2y -6>
&p« br 16A
fecfl
C5c
Jvi
©
r
I
05b
cS> —
G&a
V
©-
«
-p
K-
*
‘
05 ^
S'-
*
'
© V :
I f i
-l
*
1 S'-®
1 I
.
Lojjisr Level
NMFS SWFSC BILDING
PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA
COMPLEX# 0CAW201
FLOOR PLAN UPPER LEVEL
IFB No. SFRAN922173201
Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 31 of 32
r 1
B C 9
s - &
e ar -0'
2t P -f c - -r
(Eh
d>—'
.
©-
S’
; ©
& -
^
4'-W IT-’S' # !!'-
*
'-ffi*
- £'-
ISp'
Uppsr Level
NMFS SWFSC BILDING
PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA
COMPLEX# 0CAW201
FLOOR PLAN ROOF LEVEL
IFB No. SFRAN922173201Issued on December 20, 2021 Page 32 of 32 B c 2T-®' I I ©LILT-UP ROOFINC ^CANOPY BELOW -A I I © £ £ £
-40pp HC _> b R RD o TYP VENT PIPE THRU ROOF
RAIDED CURB IW
BUILT-UP ROOFINC
(D-CD FRESH AIR
INTA<ES *g
I l
n OPENINQ I o , THRU ROO=
K/g> ''—ROCF WALKWAY -"— I r^QDLlDODGOQOOpDDDOtlUDCDOUDDCDOn a
|fc '-{&> ' [] CD CD
RO
®"
BUILT-UP 21'
6MT YLET COPING ® ROOFIN©
i PENTHOUSE ROOF
P:
CZI © PENTHOUSE ROOF - jr 21'
PFEL ROOF PLAN
SCALE 1/3' = I'-®'
1/23/03
Disclosures for 1352 Lighthouse Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA
1. Navy Environmental Baseline Report 19942. Facility Condition Survey 19993. Navy BRAC Cleanup Plan 19944. Asbestos, Lead, and Hazardous Materials Inspection Report
5. Asbestos Supplemental6. Lead Paint Supplemental7. Parcel Map Summary Final
Environmental Baseline Survey/Community
Environmental Response Facilitation Act Report For
Naval Reserve Center; Pacific Grove
Contract N62474-92-D-3607
Delivery Order No. 0002
P repared for:
Engineering Field Activity West
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
San Bruno, California
Prepared by:
Shawnee Company, Inc.
Subcontractor to:
ERM
ERM-West, Inc.
1777 Botelho Drive, Suite 260
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
23 December 1994
( * i '
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE SURVEY/
COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FACILITATION ACT
REPORT FOR
NAVAL RESERVE CENTER, PACIFIC GROVE
CONTRACT N62474-92-D-3607
DELIVERY ORDER 0002
Prepared For
Engineering Field Activity,West
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
San Bruno,California
Prepared By
SHAWNEE COMPANY, INC.
P. O. Box 12517
Oakland, CA 94604
Subcontractor to
ERM-WEST, INC.
23 December 1994
(
TABLE OF CONTENTS
C
Page
LIST OF TABLES iv
LIST OF FIGURES v
LIST OF ACRONYMS vi
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IX
SECTION1
INTRODUCTION
Objective
Regulatory Background and Process
CERFA and DOD Guidance Policy
CERFA Report
Base Realignment and Closure Cleanup Plan (BCP)
EBS Report Outline
1-11-1
1-3
1-31-41-4
1-4
SECTION 2
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
Database
Phase I
2-12-2
2-3
Pre-Site Activities
Environmental Department Records Review
Title Search
Documented Contaminated Sites Programs
Historical Record Reviews
Regulatory Agency Reviews
2-3
2-4
2-8
2-8
2-9
2-10
Phase II 2-11
Neighboring Property Reconnaissance
Detailed Physical Inspection
Interviews with Current and Past Employees
2-11
2-112-12
i FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
SECTION 3
PARCEL CLASSIFICATION
BRAC Area Type 1, Areas Where No Storage, Release or Disposal (Including Migration) Has Occurred
BRAC Area Type 2, Areas Where Only Storage Has Occurred BRAC Area Type 3, Areas of Contamination Below Action Levels 3-2 BRAC Area Type 4, Areas Where All Remedial Action Has Been Taken
BRAC Area Type 5, Areas of Known Contamination With Removal and /or Remedial Action Under Way
BRAC Area Type 6, Areas of Known Contamination Where Required Response Actions Have Not Yet Been Implemented
BRAC Area Type 7, Areas That Are Unevaluated or That Require Further Evaluation
3-1
3-13-23-23-3
3-3
3-4
SECTION 4
RESULTS 4-1
History
Aerial Photos
Geology/Hydrogeology
Regulatory Agency and Public Agency Reviews
Underground Storage Tank
Septic Tank
Radioactive Materials
Trench Inspection and Soil Sampling
Other Results
Parcel Classification
Use Issues
4-14-24-2
4-3
4-34-4
4-44-4
4-54-54-7
Summary 4-7
C
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 “
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
SECTION 5
CERFA-ELIGIBLE PARCELS
Parcel 2
5-1
5-1
SECTION 6
DISCLAIMER 6-1
APPENDIX A
DATABASE DESIGN A-l
APPENDIX B
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE
APPENDIX C
PARCEL 1 SPECIFIC INFORMATION
PARCEL 2 SPECIFIC INFORMATION
PARCEL 3 SPECIFIC INFORMATION
APPENDIX D
AIC REPORT
APPENDIX E
TRENCH INSPECTION AND SOIL SAMPLING
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 iii
( (
f LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
TABLE 4-1 Parcel Classification 4-5
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 IV
LIST OF FIGURES
w Following Page
FIGURE ES-1 Parcel Classification Map x
FIGURE 1-1 Site Map 1-1FIGURE 4-1 Base Map 4-1FIGURE 4-2 Site and Utilities Plan 4-1 v FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122/12,15.94
LIST OF ACRONYMS
ACM Asbestos-Containing Material
Architect/Engineer
Administrative Record
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate
Requirement
Aboveground Storage Tank
A/EARARAR
AST
BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District
BRAC Cleanup PlanBRAC Cleanup Team
BRAC Environmental Coordinator
Below Land Surface
Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1988 and
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990,
collectively
BCP
BCT
BBC
bis
BRAC
California Code of Regulations
Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability ActCommunity Environmental Response Facilitation Act Code of Federal Regulations
Comprehensive Long-Term Environmental Action
Navy
Community Relations
Community Relations Plan
Central Storage Rooms
California State Water Resources Control Board
Contract Task Order
OCR
CERCLA
CERFA
CFR
CLEAN
CR
CRP
CSR
CSWRCB
CIO
Department of Defense
Department of Transportation
DoD
DOT
Environmental Baseline Survey
East Bay Municipal Utilities District
Environmental Compliance Evaluation
Engineering Field Activity, West (formerly
WESTDIV)
EBS
EBMUD
BCE
EFA WEST
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 -vi
LIST OF ACRONYMS
Environmental Impact Statement
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EIS
EPA
Federal Facilities Agreement
Finding of Suitability to LeaseFinding of Suitability to Transfer FFA
FOSL
FOST
IAG Interagency Agreement
Installation Restoration Program
Installation Restoration Site
IRP
IR site
LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank
NAVSEADET RASO Naval Sea Systems Command Detachment,
Radiological Affairs Support Office
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan
Naval Energy and Environmental Support Activity
Navy Environmental Health Center
National Environmental Policy Act, as amended
Navy Exchange
Naval Medical Center Oakland
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination SystemNational Priorities List
NCPNEESA
NEHC
NEPA
NEX
NMCO
NPDES
NPL
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PA Preliminary Assessment
Polychlorinated Biphenyl
Picocuries Per Liter
Publicly-Owned Treatment Work
Part Per Million
PRC Environmental Management, Inc.
Public Works Center, San Francisco Bay
PCB
pCi/L
POTW
ppm
PRC
PWCSFB
RA Remedial Action
RAB Restoration Advisory Board
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23,94 vii
LIST OF ACRONYMS
RCRA Resources Conservation and Recovery Act, as
amended
RCRA Facilities Assessment
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
RFA
RI/FS
SARA Superfund Amendments and Re authorization Act of
1986
SWMP Solid Waste Management Plan
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976
use United States Code
UST Underground Storage Tank
WESTDIV Western Division Naval Facilities Engineering
Command. Redesignated as EFA WEST effective 1
October 1994.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 viii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The U.S. Navy is required under the Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act (CERFA), signed into law on October 19, 1992 (Public Law 102-426), to collect data and document the existing environmental condition of Naval installations that are being closed under Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC). The initial phase of the required investigation is the completion of a Basewide Environmental Baseline Survey (EBS).
Engineering Field Activities West, Naval Facilities Engineering Command (EFA WEST) in San Bruno, California, directed ERM-West, Inc. (ERM-West) to perform an EBS of the Naval Reserve Center in Pacific Grove, CA. As part of its EFA WEST mandated Subcontracting Plan, ERM-West secured the services of Shawnee Company, Inc., a small disadvantaged business enterprise.1 Tasks required to satisfy the requirements for an EBS were completed for every parcel.2 The primary objective, as directed by EFA WEST, was to complete the EBS identifying those parcels which were CERFA-eligible.3 This report presents the findings of that survey. This report has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the delivery order and is generally consistent with the guidelines and criteria set forth by CERFA and the Department of Defense Policy on the Implementation of the Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act.4
The primary objectives of this report were to identify CERFA-eligible parcels and to classify parcels into area types according to the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Cleanup Plan guidance as discussed l It should be noted that the work provided by ERM-West, Inc. and its subcontractor, Shawnee Company, Inc. was authorized by EFA WEST under Delivery Order 0004 to Contract N62474-92-D-3607. EFA WEST is primarily responsible for the content of this report. See also the Disclaimer covered in Section 6.
2 The base was divided into parcels. See Section 2, Methodology, for a complete description.
3 CERFA-eligible is the term used to describe parcels where no hazardous substances and no petroleum products or their derivatives were stored for one year or more, known to have been released, or disposed of on the parcel and where contamination migration has not occurred. This corresponds to the CERFA definition of auncontaminated . 4 DOD Policy on the Implementation of the Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act, dated May 19, 1993.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/ 12.23.94 ix
in Section 3, Parcel Classification. The area types range from "Areas where no storage, release, disposal, or contamination migration has occurred," where there was no evidence uncovered during the survey indicating potential environmental concern (i.e., BRAC Area Type 1/CERFA-eligible), to "Areas that are unevaluated or that require further evaluation," where data gaps exist that would require physical inspection, historical investigation, or sampling (i.e., BRAC Area Type 7).
It should be noted that the EBS is a review at one point in time based on the data available at the time of the review. The EBS is the first phase in the process of determining whether a parcel is suitable for lease or transfer. Based on information developed in the EBS, information data gaps are identified so that areas where additional investigation is required can be assessed.
The EBS involved analysis of existing information concerning Naval Reserve Center, Pacific Grove covering a 60-year period.5 Naval Reserve Center was divided into 2 parcels. The classification of parcels was based on an investigation of Naval Reserve Center real property to determine or discover the storage, release, or threatened release, of any hazardous substance6 or any petroleum product or its derivatives, including aviation fuel and motor oil, on the real property. Included in the work undertaken were: a detailed search of base environmental records pertaining to Naval Reserve Center, Pacific Grove; a review of local, state, and federal government files for the base; a review of historical information; analysis of aerial photographs; identification of potential sources of contaminant migration from adjacent parcels; interviews with current and former employees; and a site inspection of the facility.
The results of the EBS indicated the classification of the undeveloped . parcel (Parcel 2) as BRAC Area Type 1 (i.e., CERFA-eligible) and the other parcel as BRAC Area Type 3 (see parcel classification map, Figure ES-1).
5 EFA WEST defined the 60 year period to be January 1 , 1932 through December 31, 1992. However, base records were reviewed through January 31, 1994.
6 As used in this report, "hazardous substance" means all CERCLA hazardous substances (42 USC 9601(14)), California hazardous substances, and includes petroleum products and their derivatives, such as oil and lubricants.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 X
>
>
Regarding the BRAC Area Type 1 parcel, it should be noted that pesticide records were not available for the parcel. Since the parcel is undeveloped, it appears unlikely that significant quantities of herbicides or pesticides were ever applied.
As directed by EFA WEST, both of the parcels were reviewed by Naval Sea Systems Command Detachment, Radiological Affairs Support Office (NAVSEADET RASO) for potential use/disposal of radioactive materials and by the Navy Environmental Health Center (NEHC) regarding all available records of medical uses of radioactive material at Naval Reserve Center, Pacific Grove. After a review of their records, both agency's concluded that there is no historical evidence indicating that radioactive materials were used or disposed of in parcels 1 or 2.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 xi
( (
SECTION 1 (
INTRODUCTION
This Environmental Baseline Survey (EBS) report summarizes information gathered by ERM-West, Inc., (ERM-West) during the period of October 1993 to December 1993 for real property at Naval Reserve Center, (NRC) in Pacific Grove, California. For site location, see Figure 1-1. An EBS is a fence-to-fence7 environmental survey of the base, including contaminated and uncontaminated parcels. Its purpose is to collect data, document the existing environmental condition of the base, and identify data gaps. However, it should be pointed out that the EBS is a review at only one point in time based on the data available.
Objective
The primary objectives of this report were to identify CERFA-eligible parcels and to classify parcels according to the BRAC Area Types discussed in Section 3, Parcel Classification. The area types range from "Areas where no storage, release, disposal, or contamination migration has occurred," where there was no evidence uncovered during the survey indicating potential environmental concern, to "Areas that are unevaluated or that require further evaluation," where significant data gaps exist that would require physical inspection, historical investigation, or sampling. EBS assessments are defined in the "DOD Policy on the Implementation of the Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act (CERFA)".
For purposes of our work, ERM-West has assumed the definition of "parcel" is flexible and can be correlated to actual Navy property usage rather than to any assessor’s parcel number found in the county records. For example, a parcel may constitute a single building or encompass grouped buildings, such as housing. Parcels were defined, in many cases, to separate different use areas or to divide known contaminated property from potentially uncontaminated property. 7 It should be noted that EFA WEST has interpreted fence-to-fence to include that portion of real property that is within the property line only . (
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 1 - 1
1352 Lighthouse Avenue
Figure 1-1
Site Location Map
1352 Lighthouse Avenue
Pacific Grove,Caiifornia
ERM-West,Inc 11'94
212&23IGCF/10.24.94
c
An investigation of Naval Reserve Center real property was conducted to determine or discover the storage, release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or any petroleum product or its derivatives, including aviation fuel and motor oil, on the real property during the 60 year period.
The following tasks describe the general scope of work performed for this project:
A detailed search of federal government records pertaining to the real property;
A review of recorded chain-of-title documents focusing on ownership history of the property, as well as any easements that were granted for underground utilities that could have an environmental impact on the property;
A review of aerial photographs of the real property;
A visual inspection of the real property and any buildings, structures, equipment, pipe, pipeline, or other improvements on the real property;8
A drive-by inspection of property adjacent9 to the Naval Reserve Center;
A review of reasonably obtainable local, state, and federal government records concerning each adjacent facility where there has been a documented release of any hazardous substance or any petroleum product or its derivatives, including aviation fuel and motor oil, and which is likely to cause or contribute to a release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or any petroleum product or its derivatives, including aviation fuel and motor oil, on the real property;
Interviews with current and former employees involved in operations on the base; and
8 It should be noted that WESTDIV has restricted the visual inspection to include only those portions of the base that have been found, according to site records, not to have uses involving hazardous materials or petroleum products (i.e. potentially CERFA qualified parcels). 9 According to WESTDIV guidance, surveillance of neighboring property is limited to one-quarter mile from the property boundary.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 1- 2
(
Soil sampling in the undeveloped portion of the real property and utility trench inspection on the developed parcel.
Regulatory Background and Process
The scope of work required for an EBS is derived from CERFA and the Department of Defense (DOD) Guidance Policy on CERFA10. Together, these documents constitute the first step in the process of evaluating parcels of real property on the base. The EBS incorporates known information and serves as a reference in developing the CERFA report and the Base Realignment and Closure Cleanup Plan (BCP). The following is a description of CERFA and the other documents listed above.
CERFA and DOD Guidance Policy
The Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act (CERFA) amends the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) to require the federal government, before termination of federal activities on any real property owned by the government, to identify real property where no hazardous substance was stored, released, or disposed of. Specifically, the law states that for a property to be classified as uncontaminated, no hazardous substances and no petroleum products or their derivatives are known to have been stored on the property for one year or more, or are known to have been released or disposed of on the property.
The DOD Policy on the Implementation of CERFA applies to uncontaminated property that is being considered for transfer by deed consistent with protection of public health and the environment and without interference with the environmental restoration process or response actions.
Both CERFA and the DOD Policy on the Implementation of CERFA state that identification of uncontaminated parcels is not considered complete until concurrence with the results of the identification is obtained. In the case of real property that is part of a facility on the National Priorities List, concurrence must come from the EPA Administrator, or, in the case of real property that is not part of a facility on the National Priorities List, from the appropriate state official.
(
10 Deputy Secretary of Defense Policy Memorandum, dated 19 May 1993. ( FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 1 - 3
CERFA Report
Information used to create the CERFA section of this report is taken directly from the results of the EBS. Section 5, CERFA Eligible Parcels, identifies those parcels that are classified as BRAC Area Type 1, "Areas where no storage, release, or disposal (including migration) has occurred" or Area Type 2, "Areas where only storage has occurred" for less than one year.
Base Realignment and Closure Cleanup Plan (BCP)
The BCP will document the environmental condition of all parcels of real property on the base and outline the appropriate action to accomplish the transfer of the property. For parcels that are not suitable for immediate transfer to the community, the document will address data gaps (missing or incomplete information) identified in the EBS, as well as site conditions and remedial actions associated with parcels known to be contaminated. The BCP will specify the methods to be used to either fill in the data gaps, investigate, or remediate the parcels. The BCP will be revised on a periodic basis. The BCP will reflect all parcels' status changes through time, until each parcel is transferred.
EBS Report Outline
This report presents the findings of ERM-West's investigation. The report consists of seven sections:
Executive Summary
Introduction
Survey Methodology
Parcel Classification
Results
CERFA Eligible Parcels
Disclaimer
The appendices include a summary of the information collected for the Naval Reserve Center, (NRC) in Pacific Grove, California. Appendix A presents the database design including the data dictionaries. Appendix FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 1 -4
B contains the bibliographic references by reference number. Appendix C presents the data output by parcel. Appendix D presents the Agency Information Consultants (AIC) Report. Appendix E presents the trench investigation and soil sampling results conducted at NRC.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 1 -5
SECTION 2
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
This section describes the approach used to collect and evaluate the data necessary to produce the NRC EBS. To carry out the EBS investigation, a work program consisting of ten tasks was undertaken.
These ten tasks were divided into two phases of work and are listed below:
Phase I
Pre-Site Activities
Environmental Department Records Review
Title Search
Documented Contaminated Sites Program ReviewsHistorical Record Reviews Regulatory Agency Reviews
Phase II
Neighboring Property Reconnaissance
Detailed Site Walk
Interviews with Current and Past Employees
Soil Sampling in the Undeveloped Portion of the Real Property and Utility Trench Inspection in the Developed Parcel
The Phase I tasks centered on presite activities and document review of various regulatory agency files and files at NRC. Some interviews with current employees occurred in Phase I because of the timing opportunity offered during this phase. Phase II included the detailed physical inspection, neighboring property reconnaissance, employee interviews, and sampling. The purpose of separating the tasks into two phases of work was to establish a basis for directing the Phase II investigation by obtaining information supplemental to that uncovered during Phase I.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 2- 1
The EBS was based on the 60-year period from January 1, 1932 through December 31, 1992. However, base records were reviewed through December 31, 1993. Data collected for each task were entered into a database, as described below. A description of Phase I and Phase II activities follows the database discussion.
Database
Forms were used to collect data for each of the ten tasks on a parcel-by-parcel basis, with the exception of the offsite property review. Data from the field investigations and file review were compiled in two Filemaker Pro+ databases. The first of these databases served as a bibliographic reference point, compiling a list all the files, interviews, and documents reviewed during the investigation. The second database contains the summaries of relevant information from the files, interviews, and documents. This second database was used to collegiate the results of the investigation into a format that could be used for classification. The database can also be used as central source of environmental information for later stages of the base closure process. Data dictionaries from the two databases are located in Appendix A. The bibliographic reference is printed in Appendix B.
A major goal of the project was to classify the various parcels according to the predefined BRAC categories. (See Section 3, Parcel Classification, for a description of the categories.) Thus, the output of the second database was designed to collect and organize the information for quick review. The output of the database by parcel is contained in Appendices Cl and C2. For example, all the information collected concerning Parcel 1 is contained in Appendix Cl; all the informationconcerning Parcel 2 is contained in Appendix C2. To determine the rational for each parcel's classification, one need only review the information in its corresponding Appendix.
Parcel 3 was assigned to the offsite property adjacent to the base.
Relevant information is included in Appendix C under the corresponding parcel number, C3. This adjacent offsite parcel was not subject to classification.
The following paragraphs describe the scope of activities conducted for each of the tasks.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 2- 2
Phase I
Phase I activities consisted of presite activities, environmental department records review, a title search, historical records and aerial photograph reviews, and regulatory agency file reviews.
Pre-Site Activities
Activities undertaken during this task included: acquiring and reviewing the environmental database search report; completing agency document review requests; acquiring and analyzing the base map; and defining parcels.
Environmental Database Report. A commercially available report was acquired from Agency Information Consultants (AIC) in Austin, Texas, for the base and facilities located within a one-quarter mile radius of the base boundary. Exceptions to the one-quarter mile search radius included facilities identified on the Environmental Response Notification System (ERNS) database, Registered Underground Storage Tank list, RCRA Notifiers, and RCRA Evaluations/Violations databases. Searches were restricted to the base property only for the ERNS database and to the base and adjoining properties on the Registered Underground Storage Tank list, RCRA Notifiers database, and RCRA Evaluations/Violations databases. The regulatory agency databases that were included in AIC's environmental database report were searched using the same radii recommended by the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM)11 when conducting Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, except that the maximum search distance was limited to one-quarter mile at the request of EFA West.
The basis for the one-quarter mile radius was the general residential nature of the surrounding area. The AIC report included landfills.
Information provided by this report included sites of documented and suspected soil or groundwater contamination, either on the base itself or on facilities located within one-quarter mile of the base. Sites of documented and suspected contamination were obtained by AIC from federal,state, and local databases. Sites of documented or suspected soil or groundwater contamination would be plotted on a base map. 1 1 ASTM guidelines are the recognized standard in the field of Phase I Environmental Site Assessments. Phase I Environmental Site Assessments are commonly conducted when commercial properties are sold and are very similar in scope to an EBS.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 2-3
Information for base-identified sites would be entered in the database under the appropriate parcel, and nearby sites of concern would be plotted on a USGS Topographic Map. However, no sites of concern were identified in the AIC report. See Appendix D for a copy of the AIC report.
Agency File Review Requests. Upon review of the AIC environmental database report, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request letters were prepared and mailed to the local, state, and federal agencies identified as having information about the base or adjacent properties within one-quarter mile of the base based on the AIC environmental report. All documents reviewed are referenced in Appendix B, Bibliographic Reference.
Base Map Acquisition and Parcel Description. Maps of the base were acquired from the Naval Reserve Center and the U. S. Coast Guard (in Alameda, California). The map was digitized into ERM-West's CAD system. Base property was divided into parcels, and an attempt was made to separate areas with known contamination or current significant hazardous material use from areas where contamination was not suspected. NRC was divided into two parcels. Parcel 1 (approximately one acre) contains the building and parking area. Parcel 2 (approximately three acres) contains the undeveloped portion of the base.
Environmental Department Records Review
This task included a review of pertinent base Environmental Department records; and, when necessary, additional departments were contacted for appropriate environmental records,
documents examined during the Environmental Department records review are referenced in Appendix B, Bibliographic Reference. An attempt was made to identify and review records for all topics listed below:
Reference
Above- and Below-Ground Storage Tanks;
Air Quality Permits;Asbestos;
Building Information;
Documented Contamination Sites;
Hazardous Materials/Waste Management Sites and Units;
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 2-4
Lead;
Medical/Biohazardous Wastes;
Oil/Water Separators;
Ordnance;
Pesticide Management;Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs);
Radon;
Radioactive Materials
Mixed Wastes;
Spills and Incidents;
Utilities;
Wastewater;
Stormwater; and
Water Production Wells.
From the above mentioned list, there were no files to review for the following topics by ERM-West:
Air Quality Permits;
Documented Contaminated Sites;
Hazardous Materials/Waste Management Sites and Units;
Lead;
Medical/Biohazardous Wastes;
Oil/Water Separators;
Ordnance; and
Pesticide Management.
The task was limited to "readily available" appropriate and applicable files, documents, or records that could be obtained by ERM-West. The FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 2-5
files were reviewed in detail, and relevant findings were summarized and documented on the appropriate forms. The results were entered into the database and cross-referenced to the parcel grid system.
In addition to review of on site records, EFA West requested review by Naval Sea Systems Command Detachment, Radiological Affairs Support Office (NAVSEADET RASO) to search for information on known and potential uses of radioactive materials or mixed waste at the base. NAVSEADET RASO concurrence is required prior to nomination for CERFA, for lease or for transfer.
The task also included interviews with the key base environmental personnel responsible for these areas.
The descriptions below describe information collected or attempted to be collected.
Above- and Below-Ground Storage Tanks. Information collected on above-ground and below-ground storage tanks included tank capacity, the material stored in the tank (e.g., gasoline or diesel fuel), the material used to construct the tank, and dates of installation and removal, if applicable. For removed tanks, we attempted to review information that indicated if the tank was monitored for leakage during operation and if soil samples and/or groundwater samples were collected and analyzed upon removal.
Asbestos. For parcels where an asbestos survey had been performed, the following questions were answered: was asbestos identified; where was the asbestos-containing material located (e.g., floor tile, pipe insulation); and was the asbestos friable. Where information was available about renovation or removal of asbestos-containing materials, ERM-West indicated the removal date and gave a description of what was removed.
Building Information. Information gathered on buildings included the date constructed, demolition date if applicable, uses of the structure and applicable dates of use, square footage, and type of construction (e.g., wood frame, concrete tilt-up).
Information concerning the buildings on the property was also gathered so that a prediction could be made on the use of asbestos-containing construction materials and lead-based paint if asbestos and/or lead-based paint surveys were not performed.
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBsL Inventories and disposal records of oil-filled transformers and switches were reviewed to gather information on PCBs.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 2-6
Information collected on PCB transformers included the transformer number and size, dates of operation, whether or not the transformerhad been tested for PCBs, and the concentration if found to contain PCBs. Because California has established treatment standards for soils with PCB concentrations exceeding 5 parts per million (ppm), ERM-West considers a PCB-containing transformer to be one with a PCB concentration exceeding 5 ppm. For transformers removed from service and disposed of off-site, records were researched to learn if soil sampling and analysis had occurred at the time of removal.
Radon. Radon surveys conducted at the base were reviewed to identify locations of radon that were below or exceeded the EPA-approved safe exposure level of 4 picocuries/liter.
Radioactive Materials or Mixed Wastes File information was reviewed at the base to identify parcels where radioactive materials or mixed wastes were stored and the period of time they were stored.
Information giving a description of the material was included in the database,
equipment were also noted.
In addition to a review of local files, EFA WEST initiated a review by the Naval Sea Systems Command Detachment, Radiological Affairs Support Office (NAVSEADET RASO) for potential use/disposal of radioactive materials and by the Navy Environmental Health Center (NEHC) regarding all available records of medical uses of radioactive materials at NRC.
Spills and Incidents. Information obtained on spills and incidents included the type of incident (e.g., fire, explosion, or spill), date of theincident, the type and amount of chemicals involved, and what clean-up actions were taken in response to the incident.
Information not included in this category included records on leaking underground tanks and other contamination incidents previously addressed in documented contaminated sites.
Radioactive sources which were incorporated into
Utilities. Utility systems reviewed included sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, industrial sewer lines, steam lines12 and petroleum pipelines.
Information collected for these utilities included the identification of lines that were known or suspected to have transported hazardous substances.
12 Steam lines were reviewed for potential asbestos insulation.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23,94 2-7
ERM-West did not review information on other types of utility lines that did not contain or transport hazardous materials. Although these lines may serve as conduits for the migration of contamination, it was assumed that investigations into areas of known contamination would examine this possibility.
Wastewater. Information collected on industrial wastewater included the type of process generating the flow (e.g., plating operations), the type of chemicals found in the wastewater, and the location and flow path of drain lines.
Stormwater. Information gathered on stormwater included the discharge point, the area of drainage, and the results of stormwater sampling, if any. Of particular concern were storage areas for hazardous materials that were exposed to stormwater runoff.
Water Production Wells. The following information was gathered on water production wells: number, installation date, depth of well, perforation locations, and water uses. In addition, date of last sampling event, parameters sampled, and analytical results were included, if available. Gravel-packed well casings may serve as conduits for migration of contaminants from the surface or near surface down to aquifers and soils.
Groundwater monitoring wells were specifically excluded from this project.
Title Search
As required by CERFA and DOD Guidance, this task consisted of a review of EFA WEST Real Estate Department records for information concerning property ownership. The review focused on ownership history of the property and on easements granted for underground utilities, such as industrial sewers and petroleum pipelines, that might have an environmental impact on the property.
Additionally, a commercial title search was purchased from BBL as EFA WEST title records may not go back for the required 60 years.
Chain-of-title searches were limited to property ownership and a record of easements that might have environmental impact. The search was conducted for the 60 years beginning January 1, 1932 and ending December 31, 1992.
Further, a detailed search was made of United States Coast Guard records for title and use history of the property as well as any restrictions placed on the use of the site by the U. S. Navy.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 2-8
Dnrnmented Contaminated Sites Programs
Information collected during this task was intended to supplement information already obtained during base environmental documents review. Documents in the contractor files were reviewed to provide additional information,
interviewed concerning project status of any Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) sites.
Hydrology /Topography. This task was primarily a review of the local geology/hydrogeology and topography information contained in Installation Restoration (IR), RCRA Facilities Assessment (RFA), and LUST program documents. If there were no IR, RFA, and LUST sites at the base, a review was made of literature about the local area or literature contained in the regulatory agency files on nearby contaminated sites, as identified in the AIC environmental database report. If available, information for this task included identification of soils on the base, depth to groundwater, and direction of groundwater flow.
Navy and contractor personnel were
Underground Tank Program. Information was gathered on the base tank management program. This included tank installation date, contents, and results of integrity testing. An interview with the base's underground storage tank program administrator was conducted to gather any additional information on the program other than what was available in base files.
Historical Record Reviews
Historic files were searched at the base, EFA West, the United States Coast Guard at Coast Guard Island, Alameda, California and the Community Development Department of the City of Pacific Grove to determine land use over time. In this phase, ERM-West documented historical adverse usage and reviewed aerial photographs.
Historical Document Review The pictorial record of historic information at the Naval Reserve Center was reviewed. Several source of historic information was researched off base and these included the Pacific Grove Chamber of Commerce, Public Library, and the Historical Society. Documents from these sources were reviewed to learn more about historical land use and potential areas of environmental concern, such as buildings that no longer exist in which chemicals may have been stored or used.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 2-9
(
Aerial Photograph Review. Aerial photographs reviewed for this base were obtained from Pacific Aerial Surveys in Oakland, California. The photographs were purchased in a scale of one inch equals 500 feet.
Information obtained from a review of the photographs included dates when buildings appeared and disappeared, locations of above-ground tanks, locations of pump islands indicating underground tanks, and locations of outside storage and use areas. Additionally indications of spills or significant staining (other than incidental staining associated with vehicle parking) were identified.
For properties located within one-quarter of a mile study area beyond the base boundary, gasoline stations and areas of land use concerns were identified. The primary type of land use was noted to the north, south, east, and west,
agricultural/undeveloped, residential, or commercial/industrial.
Commercial/industrial areas of land use are judged to be the most significant in terms of the potential for contamination to migrate from these sites onto the base. Whenever, possible, the photographs were compared to land records held by the City of Pacific Grove.
Land use was classified as either
Regulatory Agency Reviews
As required by DOD guidance, ERM-West reviewed files on the site at appropriate regulatory agencies. At a minimum, requests to review any files on the base, tenants, or previous owners were made to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Cal-EPA's Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and Central Coast office of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the Monterey Air Pollution Control District (APCD). In addition, files from local and regional agencies were reviewed if they were believed to have significant information, such as records of inspections and responses to spills and incidents. The local agencies that provided information included in this report included the Pacific Grove Fire Department and the Monterey County Department of Health. Information gathered from these agencies was primarily supplemental to the information gathered during the review of base environmental documents. Any new information not included in base files was also collected.
Files for adjacent properties identified in the AIC report were reviewed at the appropriate agency to obtain information regarding whether or not contamination from these sites is believed to have migrated to the base.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 2- 10
c
In addition, if signs were observed during the neighboring property drive-by, that an investigation was underway (stockpiled soil, open tank pits, drummed soil/water) an attempt was made to identify the agency with jurisdiction so that a file review of the site could be made.
These additional sites included those not previously identified on the AIC report.
Phase II
Phase II activities included a neighboring property reconnaissance, employee interviews, a detailed physical inspection, a trench inspection, and a soil sampling effort on the undeveloped parcel.
Neighboring Property Reconnaissance
Neighboring property reconnaissance was conducted of all properties within one-quarter mile of the site boundary to identify sites of potentially significant chemical use or storage that may impact NRC.
The neighboring property is predominately residential or recreational.
However, the types of businesses to be identified did include gasoline stations. Locations of soil mounds that might be indicative of excavated contaminated soil and drums of groundwater or soil cuttings from drilling activities were also documented, if noted during the drive-by inspection. Onsite physical inspection of neighboring properties was not conducted because the files/records reviews and the drive-by did not detect aboveground storage or other conditions of concern.
In addition, this neighboring property reconnaissance was used to confirm the location of any off-site facilities of concern identified in the AIC report. On-site inspection of neighboring property was not performed.
Optailed Physical Inspection
A detailed fence-to-fence physical inspection of buildings, structures, and undeveloped property was conducted. Specific goals of the inspection included the identification of chemical use, spillage, or other contamination and examination of outdoor areas for signs of stressed vegetation or other indications of chemical use or disposal.
The physical inspection did not involve identification of asbestos or lead-based paint.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 2- 11
c
Transformers that were readily observable were viewed for evidence of staining; however, visual inspection of energized transformers requires deactivation and specialized OSHA training. Therefore, visual inspection of transformers were not conducted as part of this scope of work. A PG&E transformer on site was confirmed via telephone inquiry that the transformer in question was non PCB.
Additionally, visual observations were made indicating the potential for surface contamination migration onto the subject parcel from surrounding adjacent parcels These observations were made from a location on the subject parcel.
It should be noted that EFA WEST has interpreted fence-to-fence to include that portion of real property that is within the property line as defined on maps supplied by EFA WEST or the U. S. Coast Guard.
Interviews with Current and Past Employees
Interviews were held with current and former site employees concerning the Phase II parcels. ERM-West attempted to identify and interview key employees who worked at the site during periods where limited records were available. The goal was to identify the use of hazardous materials on the parcel and the potential for contamination during these earlier periods. Only one former site employee was identified, but the former employee was not available.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 2- 12
SECTION 3
PARCEL CLASSIFICATION
For purposes of our work, ERM-West has assumed the definition of "parcel" is flexible and can be correlated to actual Navy property usage rather than to any assessor's parcel number found in the county records. In this EBS, parcels may vary by size. For example, a parcel may constitute a single building or encompass grouped buildings, such as housing. Parcels were defined, in many cases, to separate different use areas or to divide known contaminated property from potentiallyuncontaminated property.
In accordance with Section 120(h)(4) of CERCLA as amended by CERFA, area type determinations were made on: a records search for the subject parcel and adjacent property, chain of title review, aerial photograph review, a visual inspection of the subject parcel and adjacent property, and interviews with current and former employees.
Parcels were classified according to the categories specified by the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Cleanup Plan Guidebook
procedures.13 Below is a description of these categories.
BRAC Area Type 1, Areas Where No Storage, Release or Disposal (Including Migration) Has Occurred
This area type is defined as parcels where investigation results show no hazardous substances14 or petroleum products were stored, released into the environment, or disposed of on site property.15 BRAC Area Type1 parcels are CERFA-eligible parcels.
13 Department of Defense, "Base Realignment and Closure Clean-up Plan,” Fall, 1993, Section 4.10.
14 "Contaminant" and "hazardous substance" used in this section means all CERCLA hazardous substances (42 USC 9601 (14)), California hazardous substances, and also specifically includes petroleum, petroleum products, oil, and lubricants.
15 The phrase "or site structures" was deleted from the BRAC Area Type 1 definition (see reference in note 11 ) per verbal direction from EFA WEST on 8 November 1994. EFA WEST conclusions were based on letter from FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 3-1
BRAC AreaType 2, Areas Where Only Storage Has Occurred
This area type is defined as parcels where investigation results show only that storage of hazardous substances or petroleum products has occurred, but no release, disposal, or migration from adjacent areas has occurred. Parcels where storage has occurred for less than one year and there were no known releases may be CERFA-eligible.
BRAC Area Type 3, Areas of Contamination Below Action Levels This area type is defined as parcels where investigation results show that storage, release, disposal, and /or migration of hazardous substances or petroleum products has occurred, but the quantities present do not require a response action to protect human health and the environment. Such quantities of hazardous substances or petroleum products can be below defensible detection limits, or can be above detection limits but below action levels.16 In addition, risk estimates for the contamination do not exceed the specific levels/indices set forth in the Guidebook.17
All determinations of this category type should be made on the basis of a site investigation level of effort. This level of effort may include field sampling and laboratory analysis to support a conceptual understanding of the area, followed by the appropriate assessment of risk to human health or the environment.
BRAC AreaType 4, Areas Where All Remedial Action Has Been Taken
This area type is defined as parcels where investigation results show hazardous substances or petroleum products have been released or Esther Hill, EPA Region IX to John Corpos, EFA WEST, dated 13 September 1994.
16 Below action levels means, in the absence of installation specific risk-based or standards-based criteria, that the concentration in any medium does not exceed chemical specific ARARs (Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements).
17 Department of Defense, "Base Realignment and Closure Clean-up Plan," Fall, 1993, Section 4.10, page 4-53.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 3- 2
disposed of, but all remedial actions necessary to protect human health and the environment with respect to any hazardous substance remaining on the property have already been taken to meet the provisions of CERCLA 120(h)(3). "All remedial action has been taken" means the remedial investigation is completed, and the remedial remedy is installed under a regulatory-approved program and is operating successfully for at least one year.
These areas have the potential to be free of contamination, except for an ongoing remedial program (e.g., pump and treat).
BRAC Area Type 5, Areas of Known Contamination With Removal and/or Remedial Action Under Way
This area type is defined as parcels where investigation results show the presence of sources or releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products (including derivatives) and are confirmed based on the results of sampling and analysis in electronic databases and/or environmental restoration and compliance reports. By definition, this area type contains contamination concentrations above action levels.
Additionally, remedial systems are partially or entirely in place, but have not been fully demonstrated.
None of the parcels have been classified as BRAC Area Type 5. The review of documented contaminated sites did not include review or assessment of action levels.
BRAC Area Type 6, Areas of Known Contamination Where Required Response Actions Have Not Yet Been Implemented
This area type is defined as parcels where investigation results show the presence of sources or releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products (including derivatives) and are confirmed based on the results of sampling and analysis in electronic databases and/or environmental restoration and compliance reports. By definition, this area type contains contamination concentrations above action levels.
Additionally, required remedial systems have not been selected or implemented.
None of the parcels have been classified as BRAC Area Type 6. The review of documented contaminated sites did not include review or assessment of action levels.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/ 12.23.94 3 -3
c
BRAC Area Type 7, Areas That Are Unevaluated orThat Require Further Evaluation
This area type is defined as parcels where investigation results show the presence of sources or releases of hazardous substance or petroleum products (including derivatives) is suspected, but not well characterized, based on the results of a properly scoped records search, chain of title review, aerial photograph review, visual inspection, set of employee interviews, and possibly sampling and analysis.
Parcels classified in this category have data gaps that would require physical inspection, site history investigation, or sampling. Each parcel placed in this category is accompanied by a list of issues that potentially constrain its transfer.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 3-4
SECTION 4
RESULTS
The information presented below is a summary of ERM-West's findings for each of the parcels at the Naval Reserve Center in Pacific Grove, California. Figure 4-1 is a base map that shows parcel boundaries and the buildings currently located within the parcels.
Figure 4-2 is a site utilities plan.
To assist the reader's understanding as to why parcels were assigned their respective classifications, a history of land use on the base property is presented below. This historical write-up is followed by a description of local geologic/hydrogeologic information and the classification of each parcel.
History
A major portion of the property was acquired by the Federal government by condemnation proceedings in 1880. In 1901 the remaining portion of the facility was obtained by purchase from the Pacific Improvement Company. Until 1951, the property was operated by the U. S. Coast Guard for it's Point Pinos Light Station. The Light Station was built in 1854. In 1951, the U. S. Navy obtained the present
4.3 acre facility from the U. S. Coast Guard under a revocable permit to use [NOy(R)46128]. The base was used as a Air Intercept Training facility and performed radar and communication monitoring of the west coast. The facility was built with an emergency power system (diesel engine generator) to assure 24 hour operations.
In 1964, the base became part of the Navy Fleet Numerics Weather Facility. The function of the facility was to gather weather data from world wide sources, analyze the data via computers, and transmit the results via radio communications. The engine generator was no longer used, but was turned on weekly to keep it in working condition.
The radar was removed at the time of this change.
In 1974, the U. S. Navy acquired the property from the U. S. Coast Guard by transfer for use as a Naval Reserve Center. The transfer to the Navy included deed restrictions regarding activities on the site. At the time of this transfer, the engine generator was removed but the FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2I22.23/12.23.94 4-1
t
r‘
.
©
GOLF COURSE
-«NTU
M*
/2
r “1
r" i
U
C= IJ &K _ I 1
E- 801xz El P*grn~ T
§ I PAPrn ?
3 56 I
r- f vr i—
i
Vi'i[SJ vl J ! UIOMTKJJSE AVCNUC
STA N
N
\
pm nr*
VM)W
tM*WSKr
BLDG DESCRIPTIVE TITLE
(CURRENT USE!
LOCATION QUANTITY UNIT OF
Ml «a m IM
56 NAVAL RESERVE TRAINING BUILDING
SEPTIC TANK
12640 sr
KAU M rxrr
80 LS
FINAL
12-01-94
I FTiEND
HAW wnm WITH rocr
FIGURE 4-1 I HAM n*nm ftmig DCPARHCNT QT THE NAVY NAVAL FACILITIES DCUCERING COMAHD 1352 LIGHTHOUSE AVENUE
PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA
BASE MAP
SUL CM CAS ICENT. ML
92220204.DWG COMPILED BT ERM FROM NAVY FACILITIES
DRAWINGS 6116538. 632705 ret ncsc 't/TER AltCD MITE. FACS-ITIES AND/OH STRUCTURES SMJVM Rtri ORIGINALLY PROVIKD TO E8N-VCST IN CONPUT
T K CURRENT
B
DESIGN KRM (CAD> rORHAT AND HAY X] I SCALE AS NDTED DATD IEJl.Y4 /tl2fcC0 SMXT I or 1 <
underground diesel storage tank remained. During the property s use as a Reserve Center, remodeling was undertaken. The remodelingactivities included encapsulation of asbestos, removal of asbestos, installation of asbestos floor tile, radon testing, and the removal of the underground diesel storage tank with soil testing.
Aerial Photos
Aerial photos were obtained from Pacific Aerial Surveys, 8407 Edgewater Drive, Oakland, California for the dates indicated below.
Areas of environmental concerned were not detected from the photos.
Date Identification Number
2-20-67 AV-784-27-32-13-85 AV-2590-1-2
11-4-88 AV-3411-2-1
9-25-92 AV-4230-0325-2
Geology/Hydrogeology
The subject site is represented on the U.S. Geological Survey Monterey, California 7-1/2 minute topographic quadrangle. The site is located approximately 2,000 feet south of the northern tip of the Monterey Peninsula (Point Pinos). At its most proximal point to the subject site, the Pacific Ocean is located approximately 1,000 feet to the west of the subject site. Elevations at the subject site range between 45 and 70 feet above mean sea level. The topography at the site slopes moderately towards the west-northwest. Minor surface water drainages in the vicinity of the subject site appear to flow towards the west-northwest.
No major surface water bodies are located within close proximity (0.5 miles).
Mesozoic granitic rocks (most commonly granodiorite) underlie the subject site. These rocks are associated with large-scale plutonic activity that formed granitic basement rocks that are visible in the Monterey Bay area and the Central California Coast Ranges. The basement rocks are characterized by numerous joints and fractures. In the vicinity of the subject site, generally towards the west along the Pacific Ocean, the granitic rocks are locally covered with well-sorted coastal dime sands of Quaternary age.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 4- 2
c G
Regulatory Agency and Public Agency Reviews
Regulatory agencies and local public offices were contacted by phone or by interview for file review of pertinent information. The table below is a summary of results of this portion of the study. Detailed comments regarding information obtained can be found in Appendix C.
Agency Contact Data reviewed
Central Coast Regional
Water Quality Control
Board
Letter No records available
&
Phone
EPA Region IX Letter No records available.
DTSC Letter No records available
County of Monterey
Department of Health
Visit Sewage and Septic Tanks
County of Monterey
Department of
Environmental Health
Visit Underground Storage Tanks
Monterey Air Quality Phone no records available
Pacific Grove Chamber of
Commerce
V Visit Offsite Historical Information
Pacific Grove Fire
Department
Visit no records available
Pacific Grove Community
Development Department
Visit Building improvement, property
tax, zoning and property restrictions,
drinking water, water wells
Pacific Grove Public Library
Historical Information
Visit Local History
U. S. Coast Guard Visit Title History
Pacific Grove Historical
Society
Visit Community History
Underground Storage Tank
A 2,500 gallon single wall steel underground diesel storage tank on Parcel 1 was removed on 25 October 1990. The former tank location is shown in Figure 4-2. Based upon laboratory results of the soil samples, Monterey County Department of Environmental Health has
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 4-3
(
determined that no significant soil contamination exists at the tank location. The condition of the tank was observed to be tar wrapped, some corrosion, with no apparent holes. All required documentation pertaining to the underground storage tank closure have been received by the Monterey County Department of Environmental Health.
Septic Tank
The septic tank is shown in Figure 4-2. Drawings received from the installation indicate the septic tank is connected to the municipal sewer. An interview with the County of Monterey, Department of Health inspector indicated that their department had no records regarding this tank. There is an involvement by the Department of Health in the event the septic tank is serviced more than twice per year or if there is a system failure. In either event, the County requires that the site septic system be connected to the municipal sewer. It is the understanding of the investigator that this septic system was scheduled for service within three to six months of November, 1993.
Radioactive Materials
Naval Sea Systems Command Detachment, Radiological Affairs Support Office (RASO) conducted a records search for information on the potential use of radioactive material at the Naval Reserve Center, Pacific Grove facility. RASO has concluded that there is no historical evidence to indicate that radioactive materials were used or disposed of at the facility by either its current or previous Naval tenants. There remained the possibility that consumer products containing radioactive materials are present, such as smoke detectors or self luminescent exit signs.
Trench Inspection and Soil Sampling
A visual inspection of the utility trench in Parcel 1 was conducted. The utility trench is shown in Fig. 4-1. No stains or foreign debris (except sand) were observed in the utility trench.
A site inspection of Parcel 2 indicated that it had been used for the disposal of concrete anchors and broken concrete debris. A soil sampling study was undertaken for Parcel 2. Laboratory analysis for lead and asbestos for 12 soil samples taken from Parcel 2 indicate that FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 4-4
lead and asbestos concentrations in the soil are below limits established by EPA and DTSC. Analytical results are included in Appendix E.
Other Results
Other results of the survey include the following:
An asbestos survey has been conducted at NRC. The remodeling activities at NRC have included encapsulation of asbestos, removal of asbestos, installation of asbestos floor tile;
A radon study had been undertaken, but the results were not available. Radon levels are not expected to exceeded the EPA-approved safe exposure level of 4 picocuries/liter due to the type geologic formations in the area;
One transformer was present on the base. The transformer is owned and maintained by PG&E. The PG&E transformer was
observed to be operating and no leakage was evident during the site visit. PG&E advised facility personnel by telephone conversation that the transformer did not contain any PCBs;
Due to the age of the building lead-based paint may have been applied, however, the building was in good condition with no apparent peeling paint. No scrappings were taken to determine if older paint layers below the surface layer contained lead; No spills or other incidents that may have resulted in
contamination on the subject property are known to have occurred; The open space is zoned as 30 which restricts usage to recreational areas, wildlife preserves, and forest preserves and
A Light Station easement exists from U. S. Coast Guard restrictions placed in the land transfer.
None of these issues preclude a parcel from being CERFA-eligible.
Parcel Classification
The major goal of the project was to classify the various parcels according to the pre-defined categories. (See Section 3, Parcel Classification, for a description of these categories.) Thus, the output of FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 4- 5
(
the parcel-specific database was designed to collect and organize the information for quick review.
To classify each parcel, all data gathered for the parcel during this investigation was extracted from the database and reviewed. The output of the database by parcel is contained in Appendices Cl an C2.
For example, all the information collected concerning Parcel 1 is contained in Appendix Cl, all the information concerning Parcel 2 is contained in Appendix C2. To determine the rational for each parcel's classification, one need only review the information in its corresponding Appendix.
Based on the review, each parcel was placed in one of the seven categories described in Section 3. The following table lists each of the parcels, its classification number, and the reason for the classification.
TABLE 4-1
Parcel Classification
Parcel Classification Reason for Classification
Number Category
1 Underground diesel storage tank on
site for more than one year; tank
removal and laboratory tests
indicate no evidence of release
posing a threat to human health or
the environment.
3 No evidence uncovered to indicate
that hazardous substances or
petroleum products were stored,
released into the environment, or
disposed of on this parcel.
2 1
No significant environmental issues
found on neighboring property
3 FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 4-6
Use Issues
Use issues do not involve the use of hazardous chemicals and may or may not affect the classification of a parcel using the BRAC categories.
Use issues that fall outside the jurisdiction of the EBS process include:
non-friable asbestos; radon; and lead-based paint. The existence of these issues may impose restrictions on the future transfer or lease of the property that extend beyond the EBS process, but would not preclude a classification of CERFA-eligible.
Summary
A detailed examination of the readily accessible documents in the possession of the facility and governmental agencies (EFA West, U.S.
Coast Guard, and regulatory agencies) was undertaken to ascertain the historical events that have taken place on the land now occupied by the Naval Reserve Center. Complimenting document examination were extensive interviews with staff persons associated with the City of Pacific Grove. Extensive support for this study was provided by the Commanding Officer of the Naval Reserve Center and her staff.
As a part of this Environmental Baseline Study, the facility was divided into two parcels. One parcel (approximately one acre) contains the developed portion of the base, the second parcel (approximately three acres) contains the undeveloped portion of the base. The results of the EBS indicated the classification of the undeveloped parcel (Parcel 2) as BRAC Area Type 1 (i.e., CERFA-eligible) and the other parcel as BRAC Area Type 3, "areas where contamination is below action levels." Regarding Parcel 2, it should be noted that pesticide records were not available for the parcel. Since the parcel is undeveloped, it appears unlikely that significant quantities of herbicides or pesticides were ever applied.
As directed by EFA WEST, both of the parcels were reviewed by Naval Sea Systems Command Detachment, Radiological Affairs Support Office (NAVSEADET RASO) for potential use/disposal of radioactive materials and by the Navy Environmental Health Center (NEHC) regarding all available records of medical uses of radioactive material at Naval Reserve Center, Pacific Grove. After a review of their records, both agency's concluded that there is no historical evidence indicating that radioactive materials were used or disposed of in Parcels 1 or 2.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 4-7
The surrounding neighboring parcels were reviewed and no environmental issues affecting the facility were discovered.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 4-8
SECTION 5
CERFA-ELIGIBLE PARCELS
Information used to create this CERFA report is taken directly from the EBS report. Using the survey methodology discussed in Section 2, Survey Methodology, one parcel was identified as CERFA-eligible or CERFA "uncontaminated". CERFA defines "uncontaminated" as parcels "on which no hazardous substances and no petroleum products or their derivatives were stored for one year or more, known to have been released or disposed of." CERFA-eligible parcels correspond to BRAC Area Type 1, "areas where no storage, release, or disposal (including migration) has occurred" or Area Type 2, "areas where only storage has occurred" for less than one year. Database forms for these parcels are included in Appendix C.
At NRC, one parcel was CERFA-eligible. Both CERFA and the DOD Policy on the Implementation of CERFA state that identification of parcels suitable for transfer is not considered complete until concurrence with the results of the identification is obtained. In the case of real property that is part of a facility on the National Priorities List, concurrence must come from the EPA Administrator, or, in the case of real property that is not part of a facility on the National Priorities List, from the appropriate state official.
A brief description of the CERFA-eligible parcel is provided below.
Parcel 2
Parcel 2 occupies the eastern three-fourths of the facility. The terrain is flat, has trees and shrubs, and is covered with ice plant and sand. A concrete pad was placed on the property and is covered mostly by the sand. No observations of environmental concern were noted upon physical inspection of this parcel. The parcel has underground utilities and electrical pull boxes. There was no evidence of any chemical use or storage on this parcel. There is no documentation or evidence indicating contaminants have migrated onto this parcel via sewer lines, storage tanks, or known contaminated areas. The parcel is bordered by streets on two sides, by the golf course on the north side, and by Parcel 1 on the west side. The golf course elevation is below Parcel 2 so that drainage from the golf course is away from the parcel FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 5 - 1
boundary. This parcel is an open area and appears to have never been developed. The investigators feel that the results of any future investigation regarding pesticide usage will not have a high likelihood of altering their present BRAC Area Type 1 classification.
NAVSEADET RASO and NEHC concurrence regarding radiological issues has been obatained.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 5 - 2
(
SECTION 6 (
DISCLAIMER
ERM-West and its subcontractor, Shawnee Company, Inc. are not engaged in environmental auditing and reporting for the purpose of advertising, sales promotion, or endorsement of any client's interests, including raising investment capital or recommending investment decisions, or other publicity
purposes. The Navy acknowledges and agrees that this report is for the sole and exclusive use and benefit of the Navy.
ERM-West and its subcontractor, Shawnee Company, Inc. does not represent that this work, in and of itself, constitutes "all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the properties," as this phrase is used in Section 101 (35) (B) of the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended through P.L. 99-499 (October 17, 1986) and may not be relied upon by a purchaser as a guarantee that the property is
uncontaminated. ERM-West and its subcontractor, Shawnee Company, Inc. assumes no liability for existing conditions on the sites.
Nothing contained in the report of ERM-West and its
subcontractor, Shawnee Company, Inc. shall be construed as a warranty or affirmation by ERM-West and its subcontractor, Shawnee Company, Inc. that the sites and properties described in the report are suitable collateral for any loan or that acquisition of such properties by any lender through
foreclosure proceedings or otherwise will pose no risk of potential environmental liability on the part of such lender.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 6- 1
APPENDIX A
DATABASE DESIGN
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 A- l
Data from the field investigations were compiled in two Filemaker Pro+ databases. The first of these databases served as a bibliographic reference point, compiling all the files, interviews, and documents reviewed during the course of the investigation. The second database was used to colligate the results of the investigation into a format that could be used for classification. Below we discuss each of the databases and their data dictionaries.
Reference Database
The reference database was configured to allow entry and retrieval of bibliographic information. All files reviewed during the project were entered into the database, even if they yielded no useful information.
By contrast, only references yielding useful information were entered into the results database.
A copy of the field structure of the database is attached.
Results Database
The results database was configured to allow entry and retrieval of a wide variety information collected during the course of the investigation. There are 38 views of the data, typically one to three views for each type of data entry. Views are keyed by a field entitled "information type"; for example, asbestos information viewed in the hazardous waste view makes little sense.
Common key fields include the base name, location, parcel, reference, reviewer, date of review, and information type. Other fields are defined on a view basis, as specified in the data dictionary. In the following material you will find a master list of field names, a print of each view, and a copy of the data dictionary for each view.
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94 A-2
( (
(
APPENDIX B
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE
FINAL EBS/ERM-West/2122.23/12.23.94
NRC PACIFIC GROVE LIST OF REFERENCES
Reference# Reference Location of Reference Used? (Y/N)
Pat Hathaway - Historical
171 Forest Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
(408) 373-3811
ASC-1 Yes
AERIAL PHOTO - PRE 1937
Pacific Grove Community Development Dept
300 16th Street
Pacific Grove, CA
(408) 648-3183
ASC-2 Yes
BUILDING IMPROVEMENT RECORDS
BOOK - 6, PAGE 01 - ASSESSOR’S MAP
BLOCK 012, PARCEL 9
LCOR ROSSI (415) 395-3302
Naval Readiness Command
Naval Station Treasure Island
San Francisco, CA
ASC-3 Yes
INTERVIEW LCDR ROSSI
Joe Perry - Inspector (408) 647-7650
County of Monterey - Dept of Health
1200 Aquajito Road
Monterey, CA 93940
ASC-4 Yes
SEWAGE DISPOSAL - INTERVIEW
Moe Ammar - Executive VP (408) 373-3304
Pacific Grove Chamber of Commerce / Visitor’s Center
PO Box 167
Pacific Grove, CA
ASC-5 Yes
OFFSITE HISTORICAL INFO - INTERVIEW
Leonard Morris - Bldg Inspector
Community Development Dept.
300 16th Street
Pacific Grove, CA
ASC-6 (408) 648-3183 Yes
WELLS - INTERVIEW
Greg Glass - Asst Battalion Chief
Pacific Grove Fire Dept.
600 Pine Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA
ASC-7 Yes
FIRE DEPT - INTERVIEW
Sandy Hartunian (408) 647-9411 x203
Monterey Air Quality
24580 Silver Cloud Court
Monterey, CA
ASC-8 Yes
MONTEREY AIR QUALITY BOARD - INTERVIEW
2122 - December 21, 1994
NRC PACIFIC GROVE LIST OF REFERENCES
Reference# Reference Location of Reference Used? (Y/N)
ASC-9 Anthony W. Lobay - Director
Community Development Dept.
300 16th Street
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
(408) 648-3183 Yes
PROPERTY RESTRICTIONS - INTERVIEW
WELLS INTERVIEW Michael Leach
Golf Course Superintendent
77 Asilomar Blvd
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
ASC-10 (408) 648-3181 Yes
UST - CLOSURE DOC - INTERVIEW Cory Welch - Haz. Mat. Specialist II Monterey County
1200 Aquajito Road
Monterey, CA 93940
ASC-11 (408) 647-7654 Yes
Pacific Grove Library
Historical Dept
Pacific Grove, CA
ASC-12 HIST - POINT PINOS LIGHT STATION Yes
ASB ABATEMENT EFFORT- CONTRACT
N62474-88-C-8064
Naval Reserve Center
Construction Records
Pacific Grove, CA
ASC-13 YesASC-14 ENDANGERED SPECIES - INTERVIEW Stephen F. Bailey, PhD - Director & Curator Museum of Natural History
165 Forest Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
Yes
AIC - ENIVRONMENTAL SITE INFORMATION
RESEARCH DATA: AIC #01-0020483
ASC-15 ERM
1777 Botelho Drive, Suite 260
Walnut Creeek, CA
(510) 946-0455
Yes
CRESPI POND - ANALYSIS OF WATER
& COASTAL COMMISSION CONCERNS
Pacific Grove Community Development Dept
300 16th Street
Pacific Grove, CA
(408) 648-3183
ASC-16 Yes
2122 - December 21,1994
NRC PACIFIC GROVE LIST OF REFERENCES
Reference# Reference Location of Reference Used? (Y/N)
CONSTRUCTION OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL
PLANT WITHIN 1/4 - 1/2 MILE OF NAVAL RESERVE
CENTER SITE
Robert B. Van De Loo (510) 437-5900
US Coast Guard - MLC -
Pacific Coast Guard Island
Alameda, CA
ASC-17 Yes
94501-5100
EASEMENT (RIGHT OF WAY) FOR LIGHTHOUSE
AVE (HUDSON AVE) TO CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE
Robert B. Van De Loo
US Coast Guard - MLC -
Pacific Coast Guard Island
Alameda, CA 94501-5100
ASC-18 (510) 437-5900 Yes
AQUISITION OF LAND BY U.S. SUMMARY
UP TO INVOLVEMENT OF US NAVY
- GRANT Robert B. Van De Loo (510) 437-5900
US Coast Guard - MLC -
Pacific Coast Guard Island
Alameda, CA 94501-5100
ASC-19 Yes
Robert B. Van De Loo (510) 437-5900
US Coast Guard - MLC -
Pacific Coast Guard Island
Alameda, CA 94501-5100
ASC-20 USE PERMIT GRANTED TO USN BY COAST GUARD Yes
1951
USE OF ADJACENT LAND BY CITY OF PACIFIC
GROVE AS GOLF COURSE - 1957
Robert B. Van De Loo
US Coast Guard - MLC -
Pacific Coast Guard Island
Alameda, CA
ASC-21 (510) 437-5900 Yes
94501-5100
PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LORAC
INSTALLATION ON CG PROPERTY - 1961
Robert B. Van De Loo
US Coast Guard - MLC -
Pacific Coast Guard Island
Alameda, CA
ASC-22 (510) 437-5900 Yes
94501-5100
Robert B. Van De Loo (510) 437-5900
US Coast Guard - MLC -
Pacific Coast Guard Island
Alameda, CA 94501-5100
STATUS OF USCG REAL PROPERTY AS OF JAN
1962, TRANSFER OF USE TO FLEET NUMERICS
WEATHER FACILITY BY 1967
ASC-23 Yes
Robert B. Van De Loo (510) 437-5900
US Coast Guard - MLC -
Pacific Coast Guard Island
Alameda, CA 94501-5100
NEIGHBORHOOD DRIVE-BY & ID OF LIGHTHOUSE
BLDG USE
ASC-24 Yes
2122 - December 21, 1994
NRC PACIFIC GROVE LIST OF REFERENCES
Reference# Reference Location of Reference Used? (Y/N)
Naval Reserve Center
Pacific Grove, CA
COMMAND HISTORY OF THE NAVAL RESERVE
CENTER - MONTEREY PENINSULA SINCE 1947 &
INTERVIEW WITH SITE STAFF
ASC-25 Yes
Robert B. Van De Loo
US Coast Guard - MLC -
Pacific Coast Guard Island
Alameda, CA
DOT - USCG (510) 437-5900
PROCEEDINGS OF A BOARD OF SURVEY
ASC-26 Yes
94501-5100
VISIBILITY EASEMENT ESTABLISHED BY COAST
GUARD
Robert B. Van De Loo
US Coast Guard - MLC -
Pacific Coast Guard Island
Alameda, CA
ASC-27 (510) 437-5900 Yes
94501-5100
US DEPT OF INTERIOR MANAGEMENT AND (510) 437-5900
PROTECTION FO ENDANGERED AND CANDIDATE
PLANTS
Robert B. Van De Loo
US Coast Guard - MLC -
Pacific Coast Guard Island
Alameda, CA
ASC-28 Yes
94501-5100
Robert B. Van De Loo
US Coast Guard - MLC -
Pacific Coast Guard Island
Alameda, CA
GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENT (510) 437-5900
ENDANGERED PLANT CONCERNS
ASC-29 Yes
94501-5100
Robert B. Van De Loo (510) 437-5900
US Coast Guard - MLC •
Pacific Coast Guard Island
Alameda, CA 94501-5100
ASC-30 SUMMARY OF POINT PINOS HISTORY: 5/3/91 Yes
Pat Hathaway - Historical
171 Forest Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
(408) 373-3811
ASC-31 AERIAL PHOTO Yes
Naval Reserve Center
Pacific Grove, CA
ASC-32 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Yes
2122 - December 21, 1994
NRC PACIFIC GROVE LIST OF REFERENCES
Reference# Reference Location of Reference Used? (Y/N)
Pacific Grove Community Development Dept
300 16th Street
Pacific Grove, CA
(408) 648-3183
ASC-33 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS Yes
Robert B. Van De Loo (510) 437-5900
US Coast Guard - MLC -
Pacific Coast Guard Island
Alameda, CA 94501-5100
ASC- 34 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF NAVAL RESERVE Yes
CENTER FACILITY FOR ANY INTERESTED PARTY
- RESULT OF BRAC PROGRAM
Larry Lind
WESTDIV
San Bruno, CA
ASC-35 MICROFICHE Yes
Ann Sun Code 18 BAS x 2531
WESTDIV
San Bruno, CA
ASC-36 RADON TEST RESULTS - MICROFICHE Yes
ERM
Walnut Creek, CA
REMOVAL OF PCB ELECTRICAL DEVICES AT
VARIOUS NAVY BASES - BY JOHN PARSONS 14
DEC 1995
ASC-37 No
ASC-38 DETAILED SITE WALK OF FACILITY NAVAL RESERVE CENTER FACILITY - SITE WALK Yes Larry Lind
WESTDIV
San Bruno, CA
LETTER DATED 17 OCT 94 FROM RASO TO
WESTDIV LARRY LIND. RASO RECORD SEARCH
NO HISTORICAL RECORD THAT RADIOACTIVE
MATERIALS USED OR DISPOSED AT FACILITY.
ASC-39 Yes
Larry Lind
WESTDIV
San Bruno, CA
TRENCH INSPECTION AND SOIL SAMPLING
SUMMARY REPORT
ASC-40 Yes
2122 - December 21, 1994
FACILITY CONDITION SURVEY
PACIFIC FISHERIES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA
CONDUCTED
20-22 SEPTEMBER, 1999
Prepared for NOAA
By
Sacramento District,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
FACILITY CONDITION SURVEY
PACIFIC FISHERIES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA
CONDUCTED
20-22 SEPTEMBER, 1999
VOLUME I
SURVEY REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary i .
1 I. Introduction
II. Background 1
III. General Facility Layout 2
IV. Survey Report 2
A. Civil/Structural Engineering Findings. 2
B. Mechanical Engineering Findings. 5
C. Electrical Engineering Findings 8
D. Safety Findings 13
E. Security Findings 16
V. Capital Improvements and Criteria 17
VI. Limitations 19
Appendices
A. Prospectus Forms
B. Maps and Floor Plans
C. Risk Assessment Codes
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PACIFIC FISHERIES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA
The objective of this facility condition survey is to present a thorough assessment of the physical condition of the Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). A broad spectrum of disciplines is addressed to ensure that the civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, safety and security systems are in compliance with the latest building codes and regulations. Based on the field observations, deficiencies were identified and recommendations are made to improve the working environment of the facility. Projects also have been generated for funding consideration under the NOAA Capital Improvements Program (CIP). This survey was conducted September 20-22, 1999.
Based upon the results of this survey three major concerns were identified. These concerns are to have the facility reroofed; the existing hot water heating boiler replaced; and the existing ventilation and heating system upgraded. The existing built-up gravel roof is 25 years old and has recurring leaks. Multiple repairs have not solved the problem. The existing hot water heating boiler is approaching its useful life expectancy and, although it is well maintained and operational, it is inefficient and should be upgraded. Over the years several building renovations have been completed which have negatively affected the overall zoning and temperature control of the existing air distribution system. This report provides findings, recommendations and cost estimate to resolve the deficiencies by the identification of CIP projects. i
Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
I. INTRODUCTION
The Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory (PFEL) is a research unit (20 member staff) of the National Marine Fisheries Service’
s Southwest Fisheries Science Center.
The goals of PFEL are to:
• Provide appropriate environmental information to fishery scientists and managers • Specify linkages of environmental processes to population dynamics of important fish stocks
• Account for natural environmental variance which presently obscures important signals (e.g. stock-recruitment relationships, multi-species interactions, habitat degradation and/or pollution, etc.) essential for managing human impacts on marine populations
• Develop the means to effectively forecast effects of environmental variations on availability of fish and on resilience of fish populations to exploitation • Assess the effects of global climate change on oceanographic processes important to fish populations and on the population dynamics of the fish • Use new approaches and technologies to characterize and evaluate marine fisheries habitat
Offices in the facility are occupied by NMFS Fisheries Enforcement for Central California region, a halibut gillnet fishery observer program, a National Weather Service special project, visiting scientists from foreign countries who spend between 1 week to one year at the facility, NMFS Rotational Assignment program, and NOAA Corps Officers which work with NMFS scientists. The facility is used for national and international level meetings, scientific meetings and workshops, training by Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary for BayNet volunteers as well as public use of the conference room.
II. BACKGROUND
This two story with a penthouse facility was constructed in 1952 to serve as an air interceptor training facility for the Navy. This building is a cast-in-place concrete building with concrete shear walls and concrete floor and roof joists and beams. The building visually appears to have been very well constructed. Over the years several major modifications and repairs were done to the building including the addition of the windows. Pacific Fisheries Environmental Group moved into the building in April 1995.
III. GENERAL FACILITY LAYOUT
1 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
The total space in this building is 9,800 s.f., the penthouse which serves as a library is 200 s.f. The rest of the space is approximately equally divided between the first and second floors. The mechanical room and shop are in the first floor. Office and storage are on both the first and second floors. The building is on 4.2 acres of land at 1352 Lighthouse Avenue, Pacific Grove, California next to the Pacific Ocean. There is a parking area around the building with the balance of the property covered by shrubs, ice plant and pine trees. The property is surrounded by a fence and has two gates with electronic access controls. See regional map and building floor and roof plans in Appendix B.
IV. SURVEY REPORT
A. Civil/Structural Engineering Findings
1. Concrete Sidewalks: The sidewalk has settled in five locations and has created a tripping hazard (See Photo C01).
\ Recommendation: Grind elevated areas to a level surface. Cost: $1,000.
Parking Pavement: The pavement has settled in three areas and cracks have developed all around (See Photo C02).
Recommendation: Excavate and remove broken pavement around settled areas and place new pavement over compacted gravel base. Cost: $2,000.
First Floor, Room 16: Low ceiling (6 -3") under mechanical duct across the room (See Photo C03).
2 3.
Recommendation: Build a steel stud partition on the south side of duct to divide Room 16 into two smaller rooms and space under the duct can be used for book shelves. Cost: $ 3,000.
First Floor, South East Stair Wall: Horizontal and vertical cracks have developed on the exterior concrete wall (See Photo C04).
4. Recommendation: Repair cracks with epoxy injection to stop wall deterioration.
Cost: $700.
5. Second Floor; South East Stair Wall: Horizontal cracks have developed on the exterior concrete wall (See Photo C05).
2 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
Recommendation: Repair crack with epoxy injection to stop wall deterioration.
Cost: $500.
6. Second Floor, Room 29: Cracks and water stains on stucco wall under window (See Photo C06).
Recommendation: Remove stucco wall to determine origin of water stains.
Repair exterior concrete wall behind stucco wall to stop water stains, use epoxy injection if cracks are found on concrete wall. Cost: $1,000.
7. Second Floor, Room 22: Old water stains on ceiling acoustical tiles (See Photo C07).
Recommendation: Replace a total of six 12”x12" tiles with new tiles. Cost:
$100.
8. Penthouse Stair Wall: Cracks have developed on the exterior concrete wall (See Photo C08).
Recommendation: Repair cracks with epoxy injection to stop wall deterioration.
Cost: $500.
9. Roof Concrete Air Hood: A comer of the concrete air hood has been broken (See Photo C09).
Recommendation: Drill holes and epoxy dowels to support new cast-in-place concrete at the corner. Cost: $200.
10. Penthouse Parapet Metal Cap: Metal cap on the penthouse parapet is rusted and is deteriorating (See Photo C10).
Recommendation: Replace existing parapet cap with a new copper cap during reroofing of building. Cost: $1,000.
11. Roof Parapet: Concrete is spalling and reinforcing bars are being exposed (See Photo C11).
Recommendation: Cover exposed reinforcing bars with epoxy concrete.
12. Roof Parapet: Exposed steel concrete inserts are rusting (See Photo C12).
Recommendation: Grind inserts flush with concrete surface and cover them with sealant. Cost. $2,000.
3 Conducted 20-22 September. 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
13. Roof: All roofs (main building, penthouse & canopy) are 25 years old and have been repaired several times over the years. Present condition of this built-up gravel roof is poor and leaks will occur in the near future (See Photo C13).
Recommendation: To prevent interior water damage from leaks the building needs to be reroofed as soon as possible. Roof drains need to be replaced and roof scuppers need to be opened. Cost: $40,000.
14. Exterior Concrete Walls: Walls have developed several cracks and spalling has occurred in all exterior sides (See Photo C14). Also a large vertical crack has developed at the concrete masonry wall of the canopy (See Photo C15).
Recommendation: All concrete and masonry wall cracks need to be repaired to prevent interior wall finish damage and to stop rusting of the reinforcing wall bars. Epoxy injection will be used to repair concrete cracks and caulking will be used to repair masonry cracks. Spalling can be repaired with epoxy concrete.
At the end of the repairs an elastomeric paint will be applied in all exterior walls.
Cost: $30,000.
15. UFAS Compliance: The building is not ADA compliant. Stair, toilet stalls, and doorways are barriers to wheelchair occupants.
Recommendation: Access and circulation modifications include installation of 1) ramps at entry for both floors, 2) an elevator, 3) wider doorways, and 4) open toilet space. Cost: $150,000.
4 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
B. Mechanical Engineering Findings
1. HVAC Systems:
The Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory is heated and ventilated by a multi-zone central air handling unit. This built-up system is served by a hot water boiler and has no provisions for mechanical cooling. The central fan is served by a two speed, 5 hp motor that provides a constant volume of air flow. The HVAC system operation is scheduled by a mechanical time clock, and room air conditioning is provided only during the regular building occupancy hours of approximately 7:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. weekdays. Pneumatic controls are found throughout the system.
A 1/2-hp air compressor located in the mechanical room serves the controls. a. Boiler: The boiler serving this building was installed in 1974 and has been reasonably maintained. Hot water is circulated to the HVAC system from this 480,000 Btu/hr input boiler manufactured by Rite, which is located in the lower level mechanical room (See Photo M01). The hot water setpoint for the heating hot water system is 180 degrees F. The boiler was previously tested using and exhaust stack gas analysis kit and found to be operating at a combustion efficiency of 76%, which is considered good for a boiler of this age. The 1/2-hp heating hot water circulation pump is time clock controlled and operates only during regular building operating hours.
Recommendation: Replace hot water heating boiler with a new high efficiency boiler. Cost: $15,000.
b. Air Economizer: The air handling system for the building has a total of nine zones. Each zone has its own hot water coil and individual temperature control for each zone. Two of the nine zones (zones 4 and 6) have an additional reheat coil located downstream of the multi-zone mixing dampers. The cold deck consists of unconditioned air from the mixed air plenum. The air flow is a mixture of outside and return air which is controlled by the economizer dampers. Two large outside air intake plenums are located on the roof. The economizer dampers and actuators appear to be operable and in good repair; however during the survey they were disconnected (See Photo M02). Apparently, the economizer dampers do not automatically modulate, but are manually set by site staff on a seasonal basis.
Recommendation: Restore air handling unit outside air economizer operation to fully automatic design conditions. This work should ensure that a minimum 10% outside airflow is established. Cost: $2,500.
5 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
c. Roof Air Handler Intakes: It was noted that the outside air was currently being filtered at the roof air handler intakes, but due to failed gasketing around the exterior access doors to these filters the filters themselves were wet with moisture (See Photo M03). Wet air filters can contribute to indoor air quality problems within the building: therefore, steps should be taken to weatherproof these filter access doors.
Recommendation: Properly re-gasket filter doors or relocate filters where moisture will not collect. Cost: $500.
d. Air Conditioning: A 2-ton capacity Liebert split system air conditioning unit supplies air conditioning for the lower level computer room which is the only mechanically cooled space in the building. This unit was installed in 1997 and is currently scheduled to have its evaporator cooling coil fins replaced and the material upgraded to better resist the corrosive affects of salt air (See Photo M04). e. Occupant Comfort: The HVAC system for this building is operating efficiently from an energy consumption standpoint, but is not providing maximum occupant comfort. Two problems have been previously identified that are contributing to overheating of the building and most likely results in an insufficient flow of outside air. These include the overriding of mixed air controls for the economizer and poor thermostat zone positioning due to changing space allocation and wall partitioning.
Recommendation: a) Rebalance the building air distribution system and reposition zone thermostats to more efficiently distribute airflow and improve zone temperature control. Cost: $35,000.
b) Develop and implement a building mechanical
preventative maintenance system and schedule. Systems to include boiler, air handlers, fire sprinkler system, backflow preventer testing, etc. Cost: $5,000.
2. Plumbing:
The existing plumbing system appeared to be in reasonable condition with most of the water distribution system remaining galvanized piping. All water closets have been replaced recently with low flow fixtures. Roof drains were found to be rusted and of very poor condition (See Photo M05). No overflow scuppers were found on the roof to handle roof drainage should roof drains become plugged. 6 NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
Recommendation: Replace rusted roof drains and add overflow scuppers.
Work should be completed with roof replacement project. Cost: $5,000. 7 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
C. Electrical Engineering Findings
1. Electrical Service: Electrical power to the facility is provided by a utility-owned, pad mounted, 75 KVA, 3-phase, 4160-120/208V transformer located outdoors near the north parking lot. Power is metered at the building. Service wiring to the building begins at the transformer secondary and passes underground through 4" conduit to a 400A main switchboard located in the first floor mechanical room. The transformer and the switchboard are operational and no problems have been reported. However, portions of the transformer are severely corroded, particularly at the inspection plate cover. Corrosion has created two, approximately 3"x1" holes on opposite sides of the cover (See Photo E01). This allows moisture to pass through the cover and onto the inspection plate. The extent of corrosion on the inspection plate could not be determined. If water is able to seep past the inspection plate and onto the transformer windings, there is a possibility of a short circuit.
Recommendation: Request the local utility company (PG&E) to inspect the transformer and repair/replace as necessary. Cost: $0.
2. Electrical Service: The front access doors to the transformer cannot be opened easily due to blockage by ice plants that have grown over the transformer pad (See Photo E02). The National Electrical Code (NEC) 450-13 requires transformers to be readily accessible for inspection and maintenance.
Recommendation: Trim/remove ice plants away from the transformer pad to facilitate access. Cost: $50.
3. Main Distribution Panel: The 120/208V, 3 phase, 400A main distribution panel is operational and no problems have been reported. However, two circuit breakers, rated 125A and 220A, are not labeled. NEC 384-13 requires labeling of circuits.
Recommendation: Determine operational status of the two circuit breakers and label accordingly. Cost: $100.
4. Distribution Panels LA, LB, LC: These 100A lighting distribution panels, located on the second floor, are original equipment. The 1954 Westinghouse models are operational, although there are a few code violations. One violation is that the panel's circuits are generally not labeled accurately per NEC 384-13. For example, Distribution Panel LC, located in the conference room, has conflicting labels for circuit breakers. There are circuit designations that are written on the inside of the panel cover that conflict with the information on the circuit label card affixed to the cover. Another violation is that each panel is not completely dead 8 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
front as required by NEC 384-18. There is an average of 2" to 3/4" space between the front cover plate and the bottom of the panel which allows unauthorized access to internal wiring (See Photo E03).
Recommendation: Although operational, Distribution Panels LA, LB, and LC should be replaced, as their life expectancies have been exceeded and there is a possibility of failure of circuit breakers, wiring, and/or other internal components. Furthermore, as the panels are more than forty years old, there is a possibility that replacement parts are either not available or may soon become unavailable. Cost: $7000.
In the interim, remove existing circuit list from each panelboard and install new, more accurate lists. Cost: $200.
5. Distribution Panel LA: Distribution Panel LA located on the second floor corridor, may contain a defective 20A circuit breaker (no.9), as it trips occasionally when a 1500W (max.) space heater connected to the circuit is energized. It was observed that a desktop computer and peripherals were connected to the same circuit.
Recommendation: Troubleshoot and repair circuit breaker or circuit wiring. As a temporary solution to the space heater problem, the user can connect the space heater to a different outlet in Room 24A that is not powering computer loads and is protected by a circuit breaker in new panel, E. Cost: $200.
6. Distribution Panel LX: This 220A panel is relatively new as it was installed in the 1989-90 renovation. The panel is operational and no problems have been reported. However, access to the panel is blocked by a ladder and other materials (See Photo E04). Furthermore, the panel cover and the dead front barrier have been removed which allows unauthorized access to internal wiring and is a safety violation. NEC 110-26 requires a minimum of 3' of clear work space in front of a panelboard; NEC 384-18 requires panelboards to be dead front.
Remove the ladder and storage materials to a proper
storage area; install panel cover and dead front barrier. Cost: $100.
Recommendation:
7. Distribution Panels E and F: These 100A panels were installed in a recent renovation (1989-90) and appear to be in excellent condition. No problems have been reported. However, the circuit designations in Panel F are too general and are marked only as “lights" and “outlets."
Recommendation: Revise circuit designations to make them more specific.
Include actual room locations in circuit designations. Cost: $50. 9 Conducted 20-22 September. 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
Exterior Lighting: Outdoor area lights consist of a combination of photo-cell controlled 70W high pressure sodium lights mounted on the parapet and low wattage high intensity discharge security lights mounted on 4' timber posts at the entrance gate. Lighting is adequate. No problems have been reported.
8. Recommendation: No corrective action required.
9. Interior Lighting: Interior lighting consists primarily of fluorescent lighting with magnetic, energy saver, ballasts. Lamps are 4 -foot, T-12, 34 watts or 2-foot, u-shaped 34 watt lamps. According to a February 1999 energy study, interior lighting levels exceed the levels recommended by the Illuminating Engineering Society (IES). Replacement of magnetic ballasts with electronic ballasts and replacement of T12 lamps with more efficient T8 lamps could reduce energy costs by approximately 10%.
Recommendation: As recommended by the February 1999 energy study, utilize Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC), provided by the Department of Energy to fund replacement of T12 lamps with energy efficient T8 lamps; and replacement of magnetic ballasts with electronic ballasts.
Reduce lighting levels to those recommended by the IES to reduce energy costs. Cost: $12,000.
10. Wiring: Mechanical equipment has been tied to electrical conduit in the crawl space beneath the roof. Electrical conduit should not be used as a structural support unless specifically designed as such or meets the strict requirements of NEC 370-23 (See Photo E05).
Recommendation: Utilize a different method to support equipment and remove string from conduit. Cost: $100.
11. Wiring: In the Mechanical Room, there is a 4"x12" wiring trough with no cover.
This is in violation of NEC 370-28 which requires covers on connection boxes to contain wiring connections (See Photo E06).
Recommendation: Install cover on wiring trough. Cost: $50.
12. Wiring: In the Mechanical Room there is a broken hinge on the front cover of the welding panel (See Photo E07).
Recommendation: Repair or replace the panel cover. Cost: $100. 10 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California NOAA Facility Condition Survey Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
13. Wiring: In the crawl space beneath the roof, along the catwalk, there is a 4" junction box that is missing a cover, and there are electrical cables that have not been secured every 4'-6’ as required by the NEC Chapter 3 (See Photos E05 and E08).
Recommendation: Install cover on junction box as required by NEC 370-28 and secure cables at appropriate intervals as required by the NEC Chapter 3 for the particular cable involved. Cost: $100.
14. Wiring: There is a 4" junction box just above the ceiling tiles, near the fire alarm on the first floor corridor that is missing a cover (See Photo E09).
Recommendation: Install cover on junction box to contain wiring connections.
Cost: $50.
15. Wiring: There are four, non-terminated, feeder conductors, near the main switchboard in the mechanical room (See Photo E10).
Recommendation: Determine operational status of conductors. Remove unused feeder conductors or terminate them properly in an electrical junction box per NEC 300-15. Cost: $200.
16. Wiring: In the mechanical room there are 120V wiring connections at public address (PA) system equipment that are not contained in junction boxes as required by NEC 300-15 (See Photo E11).
Recommendation: If PA equipment is still required, install wiring in electrical junction boxes. If equipment is not required, remove equipment and interconnected wiring. Cost: $200.
17. Wiring: There are electrical cables in the mechanical room that have been taped to electrical conduit containing 120V circuit conductors. As the conduit was not specifically designated for the purpose of supporting cables, the installation does not comply with NEC 300-11 (See Photo E12).
Recommendation: Remove cables that are secured to conduit and install them in a separate raceway or secure them in accordance with NEC Chapter 3 for the particular type of cable used. Cost: $100.
18. Wiring: In the 2
nd floor telephone/electrical closet there is a 4" receptacle junction box with an uncovered 1" diameter hole. NEC 370-18 requires closure of unused junction box openings (See Photo E13).
11 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
Recommendation: Cover hole with standard junction box plug. Cost: $50.
19. Wiring: 120V, uninterruptible power supply (UPS) cables in Computer Room 14, that are approximately 1" diameter and 12' in length, lie directly on the floor and are not protected against physical damage as required by NEC 645-5 (See Photo E14).
Recommendation: Rearrange computer equipment and re-route cabling, or install equipment racks in the room so that the cables are hidden behind equipment or otherwise protected from damage. Cost: $2,000 12 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
D. Safety Findings:
1. Finding: Third floor, library door is propped open. The door opens into an exit enclosure. The door is fire rated for one hour. The only exit from the library is down the stairwell. Reference: 29CFR1910.37(b)(1), 29CFR1910.36(d)(2), 29CFR1910.37(b)(3). RAC 4.
Recommendation: Install a magnetic door release connected to the fire alarm system so that if there is a fire, the door will close automatically. Close the door to prevent the exit enclosure from filling with smoke should there be a fire in the library. Cost: $200.
2. Finding: Third floor, roof access is locked. Exit sign indicates two ways to exit the building. One is out the roof door and the other down the stairs. Down the stairwell is the only access to the exit. Reference: 29CFR1910.36(b)(5), 29CFR1910.36(b)(4) (See Photo SF01). RAC 3.
Recommendation: Cover arrow to indicate down is the only means of egress at this time. Install an alarmed panic bar on the door to the roof exit to serve as a secondary exit. Install a fire ladder from the roof to the ground. According to the National Fire Protection Association, a second exit should be available.
Windows are considered means of escape for residential buildings. The exceptions are that a single exit is approved for mezzanines and buildings which are less than or equal to two stories. The library is definitely a third floor.
Cost: $85,000.
Finding: Building has fire alarm. The annual drill was not scheduled within the twelve month period. A fire drill is scheduled for October 1999. Reference: NFPA 1-7.1. RAC 3.
3. Recommendation: Conduct yearly fire drills to test the alarm and familiarize employees how to evacuate the building. Cost: $0.
Finding: First floor, door by evidence room is propped open. The door is part of an exit enclosure. The stairwell is used for storing recycle material on the second floor. This material reduces the egress width. Reference: 29CFR1910.36(d)(1), 29CFR1910.37(b)(3), 29CFR1910.37(b)(1) (See Photos SF02, SF03, & SF04).
RAC 4.
4. Recommendation: Install a magnetic door release connected to the fire alarm on the fire door so it will close automatically. Remove the recycling storage from the stairwell. The storage increases the hazard level along the way of exit 13 Conducted 20-22 September. 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
egress, Exiting a building should have reduced hazards as the exit is approached. Cost: $200.
5. Finding: Second floor landing copying area, the fire extinguisher is mounted such that a table causes a slight obstruction. Reference: 29CFR1910.157(c)(1J (See Photo SF05). RAC 4
Recommendation: Move the mounting so fire extinguisher is more readily accessible. This is a subjective finding. The fire extinguisher is not completely blocked where it is located. Cost: $0.
6. Finding: First Floor, Room 10, a refrigerator is powered by a power strip which is plugged into the outlet. A hole was drilled into the cabinet so the power strip plug can be connected. The refrigerator is on a shelf above the power strip. The refrigerator plug is threaded through holes in the shelves. 29CFR1910.305(g)(1)(iii)(B) (See Photos SF06 & SF07). RAC 3.
Recommendation: Install the outlet in the cabinet which allows the refrigerator to be plugged directly into an outlet. Appliances should not be connected to power strips since this is a temporary wiring situation. Cost: $200.
7. Finding: First Floor, Room 9a, a bare bulb lights the room. Boxes are stored in the area. The bulb is not protected and the level of storage could result in a broken bulb. Reference: NFPA 70 410-6 (See Photo SF08). RAC 3.
Recommendation: Place a guard around the light bulb to prevent damage.
Control the storage so that a minimum space of six inches is maintained from the protected bulb. Cost: $10.00.
Reference:
8. Finding: First Floor, Room 05a, freezer is locked. There is no indication if it is used for specimens or food. Reference: 29CFR1910.1450 App A E.(d). RAC 4.
Recommendation: Label the freezer if used for specimens so food will not be mixed in with scientific material. Locking controls access, the sign would remind employees who have access to the key to use the freezer for its intended purpose. Cost: $0.
9. Finding: First Floor, Room 05a, exit light battery back up is external to unit. The battery box on the exit light is open and wires are exposed. Reference:
29CFR1910.305(b)(1) (See Photo SF09). RAC 3.
Recommendation: Cover battery box so wires are not exposed. Cost: $5.00. 14 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
10. Finding: First Floor, Room 05a, gray painted wooden box mounted on wall has a battery in it. The lead acid battery is in a cardboard box. Battery was scheduled for recycling. Reference: Best Management Practice ('See Photo SF10). RAC 5.
Recommendation: Recycle the battery or place it into a battery box. If the battery should rupture, the caustic material will be contained inside the box and making clean up easy. Cost: $5.00.
11. Finding: Throughout the building, emergency lighting system is sporadically operating. The system is composed of emergency lanterns, exit lights, and combination units. A maintenance program was disrupted when the maintenance position was vacated. Batteries were not replaced periodically. Six emergency lanterns failed testing. The exit signs which were tested had working backup battery power. The most recent system upgrade cost: - $1,000. Reference:
29CFR191037(a)(5) and 29CFR1910.36(b)(6) (See Photos SF11, SF12, & SF13).
RAC 2.
Recommendation: a) Replace the batteries for the emergency lanterns.
Cost: $350.
b) Replace the lighting system consisting of 17 exit signs and 10 lanterns with current technology to reduce maintenance costs since parts are difficult to find for older systems. Cost: $5,000. 15 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
E. Security Findings:
1. Trespassing: Subject facility is located on property next to a public golf course. As a result, the facility is subject to a large amount of trespassing by golfers seeking to recover lost golf balls. This trespassing results in malicious damage to the fence line. In addition, due to the high salt content in the air, the fence poles are deteriorating weakening the existing fence. Replacement of some poles has been accomplished.
Recommendation: Replace 15 poles to extend the life of the fence and create a viable deterrence to trespassers, thus increasing the security of the site.
Cost: $3,000.
2. Key Card: Over the last two years, the facility has installed several key card readers to help secure the facility and monitor access during non-working hours.
The key card access control system should be expanded to include all critical systems.
Recommendation: Expand the key card access control system to include all critical systems: Cost: $10,000.
16 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
V. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS and CRITERIA
The following Capital Improvements Program projects are listed in order of fiscal year priority:
1. Reroofing - FY 2001, Cost Estimate: $40,000
Reroof main and penthouse roof areas to form a four ply hot mopped fiberglass built-up roof system with gray gravel surfacing. Remove existing roofing and install a mopped roof system for the north canopy roof. Replace rusted roof drains and add overflow scuppers.
2. Exterior Concrete Wall Repair - FY 2001, Cost Estimate: $30,000 All concrete and masonry wall cracks need to be repaired to prevent interior wall finish damage and to stop rusting of the reinforcing wall bars. Repair concrete cracks using epoxy injection, caulk masonry cracks. Repair spalling with epoxy concrete. Apply elastomeric paint to all exterior walls.
3. Refurbish the Heating and Ventilation System - FY 2001, Cost Estimate: $50,000 Operation and maintenance of the former Navy facility will require the upgrading and modification of the existing ventilation and heating system. This includes modifications to the air distribution systems, boiler and auxiliary components including temperature controls.
4. Electrical Repair - FY 2001, Cost Estimate: $9,000
Replace Lighting Panels LA, LB, LC, with new panels. Remove cables/equipment supported by raceways and relocate; cover holes in junction boxes; install panel/junction box covers; remove or contain wiring terminations; provide more accurate circuit labels in panels, and correct other electrical deficiencies where appropriate to bring facility into compliance with the National Electrical Code (NEC).
5. Retrofit Existing Fluorescent Light fixture with Energy Efficient Lamps and Ballasts - FY2001, Cost Estimate: $12,000
As recommended by a February 1999 energy study, utilize Department of Energy cost sharing methods to retrofit existing fluorescent lighting fixtures with more energy efficient T8 lamps and electronic ballasts.
6. Upgrade Emergency Lighting System, install Magnetic Door Holders - FY2001, Cost Estimate: $5,900
17 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
Replace dead batteries in emergency lanterns, and begin a periodic inspection and replacement program.
Several doors opening to exit enclosures are propped open to improve circulation and feeling of openness. One exit is locked and not useable.
7. Access Control System - FY 2001, Cost Estimate: $5,000 - $10,000 Add additional key card readers to main rooms in the interior of the building.
Total cost estimate for FY01 Capital Improvement Program projects $156,900.
8. UFAS Compliance - FY 2002, Cost Estimate: $150,000
Operation and maintenance of former Navy facility will require modifications to the existing building in order to meet UFAS standards. Access and circulation modifications include ramps at entry - both floors - an elevator, widened doorways and opened toilet space.
9. Fire Exit - FY 2002, Cost Estimate: $8,500
The library is located on the third floor. Provide a second exit using the roof.
Total cost estimate for FY02 Capital Improvement Program projects $158,500.
NOTE: First floor buildout and UFAS compliance can be accomplished concurrently to gain cost savings.
18 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
VI. LIMITATIONS
This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the National Marine Fisheries Service for its facilities. The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice at the time this report was prepared. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, is made.
If there is a substantial lapse of time between submission of this report and the start of repair projects, or if conditions change due to natural causes, we recommend that this report be reviewed to determine the applicability of conclusions and recommendations considering the changed conditions and time lapse.
V
7 7
Jeff Perlegos, PE
Civil/Structural Engineer
Tino Escalona
Electrical Engineer
Mark A. Eberling ^
ryl UWieser
Mechanical Engineer legional Security Officer
Judith E. Masura
Regional Safety & Health Manager
19 Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
APPENDICES
A. Prospectus Forms
B. Maps and Floor Plans
C. Risk Assessment Codes
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
APPENDIX A
PROSPECTUS FORMS
DATE: 9/20/1999
REVISED:
PROJECT #
PRIORITY RANKING
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE PROJECT PROSPECTUS
Facility Name: PFEL. NMFS
Facility Contact/Phone: George Boehlert (408) 648-8447
Installation Number: CAW201
Location: Pacific Grove. CA
ASC/Contact/Phone: WASC/Robb Gries (206) 526-6018
Short Name of Project: Reroofing
Brief Description of Project: Total reroof of main and penthouse roof areas to form a four ply hot mopped fiberglass built-up roof system with gray gravel surfacing. Bid also includes the removal of existing roofing and installation of a mopped roof system for the north canopy roof. All debris removal is included. Replace rusted roof drains and add overflow scuppers.
Estimated Cost of Project: $40,000
Description of Problem(s) Project Will Resolve: The facility roof has recurring leakage problems. Multiple repairs have not solved the problem and the apparent solution is a new roof.
Impact of Not Performing Work: Further interior water damage will occur, costing time and expense to repair, as well as additional damage to building contents.
Project Criticality:
Currently being performed
Should be performed in next fiscal year _X
Can be deferred, but should be performed within next two fiscal years Deferred Maintenance: Yes No
Class of Asset: Bldg. / Structure Land Capital Lease*
•Only if NOAA has financial responsibility for maintenance Operating Standards Used In Evaluation:
Manufacturer's Specifications
Other
NEC NFPA UFAS
UBC
Several small jobs have been done to patch problem areas, including improvement of roof drains. Recurring leaks and separation of layers suggest roof replacement.
Comments:
- A1 -
DATE:
REVISED: 07/09/98 PROJECT #
PRIORITY RANKING
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE PROJECT PROSPECTUS
Facility Name: PFEL. NMFS
Facility Contact/Phone: George Boehlert (408) 648-8447
Installation Number: CAW210
Location:
ASC/Contact/Phone: WASC/Robb Gries /206) 526-6018
Pacific Grove. CA
Short Name of Project: Exterior Concrete Repair and Modification Brief Description of Project: Operation and maintenance of former Navy facility will require repairs and modifications to the building's exterior in order to maintain structural and operational integrity. The reinforced concrete exterior shear walls show spalling requiring repair.
Estimated Cost of Project: $30,000 (Including A/E Design & Travel Costs) Description of Problem(s) Project Will Resolve: The project will stop the fracturing and spalling of the exterior walls and prevent more expensive future repairs.
Impact of Not Performing Work: The building's exterior, which is also its structure, will deteriorate and subsequently be weakened.
Project Criticality:
Currently being performed
Should be performed in next fiscal year X
Can be deferred, but should be performed within next two fiscal years Deferred Maintenance: Yes.
No
Class of Asset: Bldg./Structure Land Capital Lease*
•Only if NOAA has financial responsibility for maintenance Operating Standards Used In Evaluation:
Manufacturer's Specifications
Other
NEC NFPA UFAS
UBC
Comments: None.
- A2 -
DATE: 10/1/1997
REVISED: 3/8/2000 PROJECT #
PRIORITY RANKING
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE PROJECT PROSPECTUS
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory Facility Name:
Facility Contact/Phone: George Boehlert (408) 648-8447
Installation Number: CAW201
Location:
ASC/Contact/Phone: Mark Eberlina (206) 526-6477
Pacific Grove. CA
Short Name of Project Refurbish the heating and ventilation system.
Brief Description of Project: Operation and maintenance of the former Navy facility will require the upgrading and modification of the existing ventilation and heating system.
This includes modifications to the air distribution systems, boiler and auxiliary components including temperature controls.
Estimated Cost of Project: $50,000
Description of Problem(s) Project Will Resolve: Allow the air distribution system to be more efficient and effective in relieving temperature control problems within the building.
Impact of Not Performing Work: Continue to have indoor air quality problems and poor heat and ventilation distribution throughout the building.
Project Criticality:
Currently being performed
Should be performed in next fiscal year
Can be deferred, but should be performed within next two fiscal years X.
Deferred Maintenance: Yes X No
Class of Asset: Bldg./Structure __X _ Land Capital Lease* •Only if NOAA has financial responsibility for maintenance Operating Standards Used In Evaluation:
Manufacturer’s Specifications
Other ASHRAE
NEC NFPA UFAS
UBC
Comments: None.
- A3 -
DATE: 10/29/99
REVISED:
PROJECT #
PRIORITY RANKING
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE PROJECT PROSPECTUS
Facility Name: PFEL. NMFS
Facility Contact/Phone: George Boehlert (408) 648-8447
Installation Number: CAW201
Location:
ASC/Contact/Phone: Tino Escalona /206) 526-6479
Pacific Grove. CA
Short Name of Project: Electrical Repairs
Brief Description of Project: Replace Lighting Panels LA, LB, LC, with new panels. Remove cables/equipment supported by raceways and relocate; cover holes in junction boxes; install panel/junction box covers; remove or contain wiring terminations; provide more accurate circuit labels in panels; and correct other electrical deficiencies where appropriate to bring facility into compliance with the National Electrical Code (NEC).
Estimated Cost of Project: $9,000
Description of Problem(s) Project Will Resolve: Increased possibility of electrical failure from outdated Westinghouse lighting panels (1954) and from wiring/equipment that is not installed in accordance with the NEC.
Impact of Not Performing Work: Risk of power loss, fire hazard, or electrical shock/injury to personnel from failure of outdated lighting panels and electrical wiring that is not code compliant.
Project Criticality:
Currently being performed
Should be performed in next fiscal year X
Can be deferred, but should be performed within next two fiscal years Deferred Maintenance: Yes No X.
Land Capital Lease*
•Only if NOAA has financial responsibility for maintenance Class of Asset. Bldg./Structure
Operating Standards Used In Evaluation:
Manufacturer's Specifications
Other
NEC X NFPA X UFAS
UBC
Comments: None.
- A4 -
DATE: 10/29/99
REVISED:
PROJECT #
PRIORITY RANKING
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE PROJECT PROSPECTUS
Facility Name: PFEL. NMFS
Facility Contact/Phone: George Boehlert/ (408) 648-8447 Installation Number: CAW201
Location: Pacific Grove. CA
ASC/Contact/Phone: Tino Escalona/ (206) 526-6479
Short Name of Project Retrofit Existing Fluorescent Light Fixtures with Energy Efficient Lamps and Ballasts
Brief Description of Project: As recommended by a February 1999 energy study, utilize Dept, of Energy cost sharing methods to retrofit existing fluorescent lighting fixtures with more energy efficient T8 lamps and electronic ballasts.
Estimated Cost of Project: $12,000
Description of Problem(s) Project Will Resolve: Existing T12 fluorescent lamps and magnetic ballasts utilize approximately 10% more energy than new energy efficient T8 lamps and electronic ballasts.
Impact of Not Performing Work: Continued higher energy bills.
Project Criticality:
Currently being performed
Should be performed in next fiscal Year X
Can be deferred, but should be performed within next two fiscal years Deferred Maintenance: Yes No X
Class of Asset Capital Lease* : Bldg./Structure X Land
•Only if NOAA has financial responsibility for maintenance Operating Standards Used In Evaluation:
Manufacturer's Specifications
Other
NEC X NFPA UFAS
UBC
Comments: 10% savings in light bill can be achieved by implementing this retrofit. Use of more efficient lamps and ballasts complies with 10CFR435. - A5 -
DATE: 11/05/99
REVISED:
PROJECT #
PRIORITY RANKING
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE PROJECT PROSPECTUS
Facility Name: PFEL. NMFS
Facility Contact/Phone: George Boehlert/ (408) 648-8447 Installation Number: CAW201
Location: Pacific Grove. CA
ASC/Contact/Phone Judith E. Masura/ (206) 526-6049
Short Name of Project: Upgrade Emergency Lighting system, install magnetic door holders Brief Description of Project: Many emergency lanterns have dead batteries. The batteries should be replaced periodically. Exit signs appear to be working, but battery backup is not reliable. Several doors opening to exit enclosure are propped open to improve circulation and feeling of openness. One exit is locked and not useable.
Estimated Cost of Project: $5,900
Description of Problem(s) Project Will Resolve: System will be more reliable. Maintenance will be reduced. Areas will be protected from incursion of smoke. Exit will be available.
Impact of Not Performing Work: Reliability of system will remain in question. Maintenance may not be performed in a timely manner and system failure may result.
Project Criticality:
Currently being performed
Should be performed in next fiscal year X
Can be deferred, but should be performed within next two fiscal years Deferred Maintenance: Yes _ No X
Land Capital Lease*
•Only if NOAA has financial responsibility for maintenance Class of Asset: Bldg./Structure
Operating Standards Used In Evaluation:
Manufacturer’s Specifications X
Other
NEC X NFPA X_ UFAS
UBC
Comments: Building sprinklered.
- A6 -
DATE: 10/7/99
REVISED:
PROJECT #
PRIORITY RANKING
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE PROJECT PROSPECTUS
Facility Name: DOC/NOAA/NMFS/PFEL
Facility Contact/Phone: GEORGE BOEHLERT (4081648-8447
installation Number: CAW201
PACIFIC GROVE. CA
CHERYL WIESER (2031 526-6653
Location:
ASC/Contact/Phone:
Short Name of Project: Access Control System
Brief Description of Project: Add additional key card readers to on main rooms on the interior of the building.
Estimated Cost of Project: $5,000.00 - $10,000.00
Description of Problem(s) Project Will Resolve: Facility is located adjacent to a public golf course and has a problem with trespassing and malicious damage to the property. This will allow the facility manager the ability to limit access to critical systems and have a record of those who do access those spaces.
Impact of Not Performing Work: Trespassing will continue and possibly increase. Access to critical systems will continue without significant control.
Project Criticality:
Currently being performed
Should be performed in next fiscal year _X
Can be deferred, but should be performed within next two fiscal years Deferred Maintenance: Yes No
Class of Asset: Bldg./Structure Land Capital Lease*
•Only if NOAA has financial responsibility for maintenance Operating Standards Used In Evaluation:
Manufacturer's Specifications
Other
NEC NFPA UFAS J
(_
UBC
Comments: None
- A7 -
DATE: 01/05/99
REVISED:
PROJECT #
PRIORITY RANKING
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE PROJECT PROSPECTUS
PFEL Center Facility Name (NMFS) :
Facility Contact/Phone George Boehlert (408) 648-8447
Installation Number: CAW201
Location:
ASC/Contact/Phone: WASC/Robb Gries (808) 973-2938
Pacific Grove. CA
Short Name of Project: UFAS compliance
Brief Description of Project: Operation and maintenance of former Navy facility will require modifications to the existing building in order to meet UFAS standards. Access and circulation modifications include ramps at entry - both floors - an elevator, widened doorways and opened toilet space
Estimated Cost of Project: $150,000 (Includes A-E Design and Travel) Description of Problem(s) Project Will Resolve: The PFEL will conform to UFAS [ADA] for staff and public visitors.
Impact of Not Performing Work: The PFEL will have to make special provisions in order to accommodate handicap personnel and visitors. This has provided use of this facility for public meetings.
Project Criticality:
Currently being performed
Should be performed in next fiscal year
Can be deferred, but should be performed within next two fiscal years X Deferred Maintenance: Yes No
Class of Asset: Bldg./Structure Land Capital Lease*
•Only if NOAA has financial responsibility for maintenance Operating Standards Used In Evaluation:
Manufacturer’s Specifications
Other
NEC NFPA UFAS _X
UBC
- A8 -
Comments: None.
PROJECT #
PRIORITY RANKING
DATE: 05/10/00
REVISED:
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE PROJECT PROSPECTUS
Facility Name: PFEL. NMFS
Facility Contact/Phone: George Boehlert (408) 648-8447
Installation Number: CAW201
Location:
ASC/Contact/Phone: WASC / Judith Masura (206) 526-6049
Pacific Grove. CA
Short Name of Project: Fire Exit
Brief Description of Project: The library is located on the third floor. A second exit should be provided using the roof.
Estimated Cost of Project: $8,500
Description of Problem(s) Project Will Resolve: The only egress from the library is down a flight of stairs, a second exit to the roof does not have access to the ground. Should the stairwell be compromised, an alternate means of escape is not available. The door to the roof can serve as a means of egress, but a true area of refuge is not served by the roof.
Impact of Not Performing Work: There is a requirement by life safety to have two means of escape for an area. The roof does not meet this requirement.
Project Criticality:
Currently being performed
Should be performed in next fiscal year X
Can be deferred, but should be performed within next two fiscal years Deferred Maintenance: Yes No
Class of Asset: Bldg./Structure Land Capital Lease*
•Only if NOAA has financial responsibility for maintenance Operating Standards Used In Evaluation:
Manufacturers Specifications NEC
Other
NFPA _X_ UFAS
UBC
Comments:
- A9 -
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
APPENDIX B
MAPS AND FLOOR PLANS
Conducted 20
-22 September
, 1999
Pacific Grove
, California NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
Evacuation Plan
t Fire Alarm *
Fire Extinguisher First (lower) Floor
- B2 -
Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California NOAA Facility Condition Survey Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
I
Evacuation Plan
27 "
l
"
Fire Alarm *
Fire Extinguisher Second (upper) Floor
- B3 -
Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
Evacuation Plan
0 •xr 0I
0 '
-a
1 -ZCF -'
O'
I
T>
~
• •
t
cr ..
u i
;
IEI : •
m
•
g
g I
sa o
*
i -s
nj Li®
D
i
V a
0-
<J-
§
I
a--
i
i
i
*
Rre.Extinguishtr 3rd Floor
- B4 -
NOAA Facility Condition Survey
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California
APPENDIX C
RISK ASSESSMENT CODES
Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California NOAA Facility Condition Survey Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
NOAA ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (NECSAS)
RISK CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
RISK ASSESSMENT CODE (RAC)
HAZARD SEVERITY
Description: Catastrophic
Definition: Death or permanent total disability, system loss, major property damage (>$500,000), and/or major environmental degradation.
Category: I
Category: II Description: Critical
Definition: Permanent partial disability or temporary total disability in excess of three months, major system damage, significant property damage (>$100,000), and/or significant environmental degradation.
Category: III
Definition: Minor injury, lost workday accident, or compensable injury or illness, minor system damage, minor property damage (>$10,000), and/or minor environmental damage.
Description: Marginal
Category: IV Description: Negligible
Definition: First aid or minor supportive medical treatment, minor system impairment, and/or minor environmental incident.
ACCIDENT PROBABILITY
Description: Frequent
Individual item or activity: Likely to occur frequently in life of system, item, facility, or operation, etc. Fleet or inventory: Continuously experienced.
Level: A
Description: Probable
Individual item or activity: Will occur several times in life of system, item, facility, or operation, etc. Fleet or inventory: Will occur frequently.
Level: B
Description: Occasional Level: C
Individual item or activity: Likely to occur sometime in life of system, item, facility, or operation, etc. Fleet or inventory: Will occur several times.
Description: Remote
Individual item or activity: Unlikely but possible to occur in life of system, item, facility or operation, etc. Fleet or inventory: Unlikely, but can reasonably be expected to occur.
Level: D
Description: Improbable Level: E
Individual item or activity: So unlikely it can be assumed occurrence may not be experienced. Fleet or inventory: Unlikely to occur, but possible. - C1 -
Conducted 20-22 September, 1999
Pacific Grove, California NOAA Facility Condition Survey Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory
RISK ASSESSMENT CODE (RAC)
RAC (1) Imminent Danger: catastrophic requiring immediate attention (Operation, activities must be discontinued).
RAC (2) Dangerous: potentially catastrophic requiring planned abatement (Operations, activities should be discontinued, or with limited and/or strict controls).
RAC (3) Serious: major life safety, facility and system loss, requiring planned abatement (Operations continued with controls).
RAC (4), and RAC (5)Non-senous: minor life-safety, system or facility damage (Operation continued with risk acceptance by Supervisor or Operator).
RISK ASSESSMENT CODE MATRIX
Accident Probability
IA 1 IB 1 ic 2 ID 3 IE 4
IIA 1 IIB 2 IIC 3 IID 4 HE 5
m
®§
Hazard
Severity IIIA 2 IIIB 3 me 4 HID 5 HIE 5
IVA 3 IVB 4 IVC5 IVD5 IVE 5
- C2 -
FACILITY CONDITION SURVEY
PACIFIC FISHERIES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA
CONDUCTED
20-22 SEPTEMBER, 1999
a
VOLUME II
PICTORIAL SUMMARY
PHOTOGRAPHS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
I. ORIENTATION PHOTOGRAPHS 1
II. CIVIL/STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PHOTOGRAPHS 4
III. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING PHOTOGRAPHS 9
IV. ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING PHOTOGRAPHS 12
V. SAFETY PHOTOGRAPHS 17
VI. SECURITY PHOTOGRAPHS 22
I. ORIENTATION PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo A01 NOAA sign at property entrance
Building, southwest elevation
Building, southeast elevation
Photo A02 -
Photo A03 -
Photo ACM - Building, northeast elevation
Photo A05 - Building, northwest elevation
- 1 -
Photo A01 - NOAA sign at property entrance
- 2 -
Photo A02 - Building, southwest elevation Photo A03 - Building, southeast elevation Photo A04 - Building, northeast elevation Photo A05 - Building, northwest elevation - 3 -
II. CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo C01 Raised sidewalk
Photo C02 Settled parking pavement
Photo C03 Low ceiling, first floor, Room 16
Photo C04 Cracked concrete wall, southeast stairs
Photo COS Cracked concrete wall, southeast stairs
Photo C06 Cracked plaster wall, second floor, Room 29
Photo C07 Water stains on ceiling, second floor, Room 22 Photo C08 Cracked concrete wall, penthouse stairs
Photo C09 Broken concrete, roof air hood
Photo C10 Parapet metal cap, penthouse
Photo C11 Spalling concrete, roof parapet
Photo C12 Rusted steel inserts, roof parapet
Photo C13 Leaking roof
Photo C14 Cracked exterior concrete wall
Photo C15 Cracked exterior masonry wall
- 4 -
Photo C01 -Raised sidewalk Photo C02 -Settled parking pavement Photo C03 - Low ceiling, first floor, Room 16 Photo C04 -Cracked concrete wall, southeast stairs - 5 -
Photo C05 -Cracked concrete wall, southeast stairs Photo C06 -Cracked plaster wall, second floor, Room 29 Photo C07 -Water stains on ceiling, second floor, Room 22 Photo C08 -Cracked concrete wall, penthouse stairs - 6 -
Photo C09 -Broken concrete, roof air hood Photo C10 -Parapet metal cap, penthouse Photo C11-Spalling concrete, roof parapet Photo C12 - Rusted steel inserts, roof parapet - 7 -
Photo C13 - Leaking roof Photo C14 -Cracked exterior concrete wall Photo C15 -Cracked exterior masonry wall
- 8 -
III. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING PHOTOGRAPHS
i
Photo M01 Hot water boiler
Photo M02 Outside air intake, economizer disabled
Photo M03 Wet air intake filter
Photo M04 Liebert split system air conditioner
Photo M05 Rusted roof drain
- 9 -
t
Photo M01 - Hot water boiler
- 10 -
IV. ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo E01 Extensive corrosion on utility transformer
Ice plants obstructing transformer access
Panel LC (LA and LB similar) not dead front
Ladder blocks access to panel LX in Mechanical Room
Photo E02
Photo E03
Photo E04
Photo E05 Equipment tied to electrical conduit
Photo E06 Cover not installed on wiring trough
Photo E07 Broken hinge on welding panel cover
Photo E08 Electrical cables not secured in crawl space
Photo E09 Cover not installed on junction box
Photo E10 Feeder conductors not terminated or contained Photo E11 Communication wiring taped to electrical conduit Photo E12 Wiring connections not contained in a junction box Photo E13 Hole in junction box
120V Cables from UPS in Computer Room subject to physical damage
Photo E14
- 12 -
Photo EOT -Extensive corrosion on utility transrormer Photo E02 -Ice plants obstructing transformer access Photo E03 - Panel LC (LA and LB similar) not dead front Photo E04 - Ladder blocks access to panel LX in mech. room - 13 -
Photo E05 - Equipment tied to electrical conduit
m
Photo E07 - Broken hinge on welding panel cover Photo E08 - Electrical cables not secured in crawl space - 14 -
Photo E09 - Cover not installed on junction box Photo E10 - Feeder Conductors not terminated or contained Photo E11 - Communication wiring taped to electrical conduit Photo E12 - Wiring connections not contained in a junction box - 15 -
Photo E14 - 120V cables from UPS in Computer Room subject to physical damage
Photo E13 - Hole in junction box
- 16 -
V. SAFETY
Picture List
Photo SF01 Third floor, door leading to roof
Photo SF02 First floor, door propped open into west stairwell Photo SF03 First floor, door propped open into west stairwell Photo SF04 Second floor, recycling stored in stairwell
Photo SF05 Second floor, copy area, fire extinguisher
Photo SF06 First floor, Room 10, power strip in cabinet Photo SF07 First floor, Room 10, refrigerator using power strip Photo SF08 First floor, mailroom, boxes stored close to light bulb Photo SF09 First floor, Room 05a, exposed wiring
Photo SF10 First floor, old battery in wooden box
Photo SF11 Typical emergency illumination lantern
Photo SF12 Typical hallway with exit light in comer
Photo SF13 Second floor, paper exit sign
- 17 -
*1
*
lafe
Photo SF01 - Third floor, door leading to roof Photo SF02 - First floor, door propped open into west stairwell Photo SF03 - First floor, door propped open into west stairwell Photo SF04 - Second floor, recycling stored in stairwell - 18 -
Photo SF05 - Second floor, copy area, fire extinguisher Photo SF06 - First floor, Room 10, power strip in cabinet Photo SF07 - First floor, Rm 10, refrigerator using power strip Photo SF08 - First floor, mailroom, boxes stored close to light bulb - 19 -
Photo SF10 - First floor, old battery in wooden box
Photo SF11 Photo SF12 - Typical hallway with exit light in corner - Typical emergency illumination lantern - 20 -
Ill
Photo SF13 - Second floor, paper exit sign
- 2 1 -
VI. SECURITY
Photo SE01 North fence post
Photo SE02 Northeast fence
Photo SE03 Main door
Photo SE04 Loading dock doors
Photo SE05 East door
]
- 22 -
Photo SE01 - North fence post Photo SE02 - Northeast fence Photo SE33 - Main door Photo SE04 - Loading dock doors
- 23 -
Photo SE 5 - East door
- 24 -
( (
CLEAN
Contract No. N62474-88-D-5086
Contract Task Order No. 0312
Navy Project Manager: Larry Lind
Navy Base Environmental Coordinator: Larry Lind
PRC BRAC Closure Plan Coordinator: Stuart Strum
NAVAL RESERVE CENTER PACIFIC GROVE
PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
CLEANUP PLAN
Prepared By
PRC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
120 Howard Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, California 94105
415/543-4880
March 8, 1994
( (
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AL-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1-1
1.1 PURPOSE
ORGANIZATION
ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
BASE CLOSURE PROJECT TEAM
INSTALLATION HISTORY
OFF-BASE PROPERTY OR OTHER TENANTS
HAZARDOUS WASTES/SUBSTANCES GENERATED ON SITE
1-1
1.2 1-2
1.3 1-2
1.4 1-3
1.5 1-3
1.6 1-6
1.7 1-6
2.0 PROPERTY DISPOSAL AND REUSE PLAN 2-1
STATUS OF DISPOSAL PLANNING PROCESS
RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS
PROPERTY TRANSFER METHODS
2.1 2-1
2.2 2-1
2.3 2-3
( 2.3.1 FOSL Review Process Policy Summary 2.3.2 FOST Policy Summary
2.3.3 Potential Transfers of Pacific Grove Property
2-32-52-5
3.0 INSTALLATION-WIDE ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM STATUS 3-1
3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM STATUS 3-1
3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAM STATUS
3.2.1 Storage Tanks
3.2.2 Hazardous Materials/Waste Management3.2.3 Solid Waste Management
3.2.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)3.2.5 Asbestos3.2.6 Radon 3-1
3-13-2
3-2
3-23-3
3-3
3.3 NATURAL RESOURCES 3-3
3.3.1 Sensitive Habitats
3.3.2 Archaeological Resources
3.3.3 Historical Structures
3.3.4 Native American Resources
3.3.5 Paleontological Resources3.3.6 Wetlands, Surface Waters and Flood Plains 3-4
3-4
3-53-5
3-5
3-5
i
3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION OF PROPERTY
3.4.1 Suitability of Installation Property for Transfer by Deed 3-6
3-7
3.5 STATUS OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 3-7
4.0 INSTALLATION-WIDE STRATEGY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION . . . 4-1
4.1 COMPLIANCE STRATEGY 4-1
4.2 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES STRATEGY
4.2.1 Natural Resources
4.2.2 Rare or Sensitive Habitat
4-1
4-14-2
4.3 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT STRATEGY 4-2
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM MASTER SCHEDULES 5-1
5.1 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
5.1.1 Environmental Compliance Schedule
5.1.2 Environmental Compliance Requirements by Fiscal Year 5-1
5-15-1
NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
5.2.1 Natural and Cultural Resources Schedule5.2.2 Natural and Cultural Resources Requirements by Fiscal Year
5.2 5-1
5-1
5-2
5.3 MEETING SCHEDULE 5-2
6.0 TECHNICAL AND OTHER ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED 6-1
6.1 DATA GAPS
6.1.1 BRAC Cleanup Team Action Items
6-1
6-1
6.2 IDENTIFICATION OF CLEAN PROPERTIES 6-1
6.3 UPDATING THE EBS AND NATURAL/CULTURAL RESOURCES
DOCUMENTATION 6-2
6.4 IMPLEMENTING THE POLICY FOR ON-SITE DECISION MAKING 6-2
6.5 FUNDING CONSTRAINTS 6-2
7.0 REFERENCES 7-1
APPENDIX A
A FISCAL YEAR/COST REQUIREMENTS
ii
TABLES
Table Page
ES-1 BCT/PROJECT TEAM ACTION ITEMS ES-3
1-1 BASE CLOSURE PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS 1-7
1-2 HISTORY OF INSTALLATION OPERATIONS 1-81-3 HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATING ACTIVITIES TABLE 1-8
FIGURES
Figure Page
1-1 NRC PACIFIC GROVE REGIONAL LOCATION 1-41-2 SITE LAYOUT MAP 1-5 1-3 NRC PACIFIC GROVE OFF-BASE LAND USE MAP 1-9
5-1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM SCHEDULES 5-3
iii
( (
( ABBREVIATIONS AND AC RONYMS
ACM Asbestos-Containing Material
BRAC Cleanup Plan
BRAC Cleanup Team
Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1988 and Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, collectively
BCP
BCT
BRAC
DoD Department of Defense
CERCLA
CERFA
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act
Code of Federal Regulations
Community Reuse Committee
CFR
CRC
EBS Environmental Baseline Survey
Environmental Impact Statement
United States Environmental Protection Agency
EIS
EPA
IRP Installation Restoration Program
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act, as amended
O&M
OSHA
Operations and Maintenance
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Preliminary Assessment
Polychlorinated Biphenyl
PA
PCB
Remedial Action
Resources Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended
Remedial Investigation
Record of Decision
RA
RCRA
RI
ROD
SI Site Inspection
UST Underground Storage Tank
WESTDIV Western Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command ( c:\Repora, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 1994
AL-1
*
*
t
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-510) (BRAC 91, 93, and 95), the Naval Reserve Center Pacific Grove (NRC Pacific Grove) has been scheduled for closure.
As part of the base closure process, this base realignment and closure (BRAC) cleanup plan contains the status of environmental programs, and describes the management and response strategy and action items related to closure of the NRC Pacific Grove. These programs support full restoration of the base property, which is necessary to meet the requirements for property transfer and reuse activities associated with the closure of the facility. The BRAC cleanup plan considers the following regulatory mechanisms: the Base Realignment and Closure Act; the National Environmental Policy Act; Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act as amended by the Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; and other applicable laws.
The BRAC Cleanup Plan (BCP) is a planning document. The BRAC cleanup plan is a dynamic document that will be updated to reflect the current status and strategies for environmental actions.
This document is representative of conditions and strategies as of February 1994.
Status of Disposal, Reuse, and Interim Lease Process
The NRC Pacific Grove is scheduled to close on June 30, 1994. Disposal of the reserve center involves three interrelated activities: implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act environmental impact statement process, development of a disposal plan, and development of a community reuse plan.
To date, no federal transfer of properties have occurred at the NRC Pacific Grove. Several federal agencies have expressed interests in reuse of the facility, but screening and reuse evaluations have not yet been conducted for the proposed federal reuse options. The local community has also expressed an interest in use of the facility for recreational and continuing education purposes. Because of the limited size of the facility and the absence of environmental restoration activities at the site, a formal community relations program has not been developed and is not required for NRC Pacific Grove. c:\Repora. SS
PGNRC.BCP. March 1994 ES-1
Environmental Restoration Program Status
There are currently no restoration-related activities underway at the NRC Pacific Grove because of the size of the installation, the absence of industrial activity, and the limited scope of potential contamination sources at the site.
Key Restoration and Transferability Strategies and Schedules The BRAC cleanup plan strategies will be implemented to focus compliance activities to support final transfer of base property. Potentially contaminated areas will be evaluated, and natural resource concerns will be characterized.
Current BRAC Cleanup Plan Action Items
Recommendations and issues associated with environmental compliance, and technical and management action items that require further evaluation and implementation by the BRAC cleanup team include identification and assessment of asbestos-containing materials, and the evaluation of endangered species at the base. This plan thus focuses on these two potential areas of environmental concern. Base Closure Team action items are summarized in Table ES-1. c:\Reporu, SS
PGNRC.BCP. March 1994
ES-2
c r
r TABLE ES-1
BCT/PROJECT TEAM ACTION ITEMS
Status
Action Item Completed Current To Be
Performed
Underground Storage Tank
Removal
UST Removed NFA NFA
Asbestos Debris Evaluation EBS Presence of
ACM has not
been verified
ACM testing
Natural Resources Evaluation EBS Presence of
sensitive
natural
resources has
not been
identified
NEPA compliance
survey
Suitability for Property Transfer Insufficient
Information
BRAC Cleanup Team Meetings BCT Members
designated for
Navy and
DTSC
representatives
BCT member
for U.S. EPA
not designated
Completion of
BCT, schedule of
BCT meetings
c:\Repora, SS
PGNRC.BCP. March 1994
ES-3
M
••o
-
••
*
(
1.0 INTRODUCTION ANDSUMMARY
The Naval Reserve Center Pacific Grove (NRC Pacific Grove) is located in Pacific Grove, California, in Monterey County, approximately 60 miles southeast of San Francisco. The 4-acre installation is operated by the Naval Reserve Readiness Command, Region 20, and has hosted training and exercise activities for up to 90 reservists.
Under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-510) (BRAC 91, 93 and 95), NRC Pacific Grove has been scheduled for closure on June 30, 1994. Since an area of possible contamination has been identified at the site, a strategy has been developed to investigate this area and to evaluate natural resource concerns regarding endangered species that may be present- at the facility.
This base realignment and closure (BRAC) cleanup plan (BCP) has been prepared (1) to summarize the status of the facility with respect to environmental compliance programs and (2) to present a comprehensive strategy for the investigation and possible cleanup action necessary to protect human health and the environment. This BCP is considered a working document that will be updated, if required.
1.1 PURPOSE
The NRC Pacific Grove site has not hosted significant industrial activity or waste disposal; however, some environmental concerns at the site will be addressed as part of the base closure and property transfer processes. Some areas of the Reserve Center property may be contaminated by demolition debris that contains asbestos and protected natural resources that have been identified at adjacent properties may also be present at the reserve center. In response to these environmental concerns, a concerted effort has been implemented by the Navy to identify any contamination at the property, toclean up any contamination that presents a hazard to human health and the environment, and to develop management strategies to protect any sensitive natural resources present at the property during and after base closure.
This is a planning document. Information, schedules, and proposed response actions presented in this BCP do not necessarily represent those that have been or will be approved by the Navy or federal and f c:\Repora,
PGNRC.BCP, March 1994
1-1
state regulatory agencies. It was necessary to make certain assumptions and interpretations to develop the estimates used in this plan. These assumptions are provided in Appendix A. As additional data become available, implementation programs and cost estimates could be altered. If such changes occur, the BCP will be updated to reflect these changes in status.
1.2 ORGANIZATION
The BCP is divided into 6 chapters. Chapter 1.0 describes the objectives of the environmental compliance and natural resources management programs, explains the purpose of the BCP, introduces the project team formed to implement the program, and briefly describes the history of the facility.
Chapter 2.0 summarizes the current status of the property disposal planning process and describes the relationship of the disposal process to other environmental programs. Chapter 3.0 summarizes the history and current status of the facility environmental compliance programs, community relations activities, and the environmental condition of the reserve center property. Chapter 4.0 describes the basewide strategy for environmental compliance. This includes the strategy for evaluation of potential asbestos-containing material in demolition debris disposed at the property, and for evaluating natural resources that may require special protection. Chapter 5.0 presents schedules and estimates of fiscalrequirements for the compliance programs. Chapter 6.0 describes specific technical and/or administrative issues that should be addressed by the BRAC Cleanup Team. Appendix A contains supporting information for cost estimates and program schedules for environmental compliance activities.
1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the base closure environmental restoration program at the NRC Pacific Grove are to:
Protect human health and the environment
Meet reuse goals established by the Navy and the community Comply with existing statutes and regulations
c:\Repara, SS
PGNRC.BCP, Much 199« 1-2
(
( Conduct environmental baseline surveys (EBS)
Continue efforts to identify all potential contaminated areas Establish priorities for compliance activities, if required Initiate selected removal actions to control, eliminate, or reduce risks to manageable levels, if required
Identify and map areas suitable and those not suitable for transfer by deed Inform the Navy real estate specialist of properties deemed unsuitable for transfer because the property has not been properly evaluated or because the property poses an unacceptable risk, or natural resources have not been evaluated
1.4 BASE CLOSURE PROJECT TEAM
The NRC Pacific Grove project team has not yet been established. The BRAC Environmental Coordinator is Larry Lind of the Western Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command (WESTDIV) in San Bruno, California. The Base Closure Team (BCT) member from the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency has not been designated. The program will be periodically reviewed during project team meetings, which will be used as a forum to reach consensus on decisions among federal and state regulators. The core team includes representatives of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 9, and the California Environmental Protection Agency. Table 1-1 lists the team members and their respective roles and responsibilities.
1.5 INSTALLATION HISTORY
The NRC Pacific Grove is a one-building facility on 4.28 acres in Pacific Grove, Monterey County, California. Figure 1-1 shows the regional location of the facility and Figure 1-2 shows the site layout. The land was acquired by the U.S. government for the Point Pinos lighthouse in two actions:
a condemnation proceeding in 1870 and purchase of property in 1901. The U.S Coast Guard issued a permit to the Navy to construct and operate an air intercept training facility at the current location of the reserve center in 1951. The existing building constructed in 1952, is a 3-story structure with 13,800 square feet of space. The building originally housed the equipment, operating areas, and c c:\Repora, SS PGNRC.BCP, March 1994 1-3
1-4
administrative offices for the air intercept training facility. Radar antennae were constructed on towers mounted on concrete pads along the eastern side of the property. The air intercept training facility was deactivated, and all radar equipment, including the antennae and towers were removed sometime before 1963. The facility was reactivated as a fleet numerical weather facility, and was used as a computing and reporting center for meteorological analyses. The property title was transferred from the Coast Guard to the Navy in 1974, with the Coast Guard retaining an easement to prevent any construction that would block the visibility of the lighthouse in the western half of the property. After the facility was deactivated as a weather facility, it was transferred to the Naval Reserve, and is now used for reserve training and support activities.
Historical operations of the facility are summarized in Table 1-2. Table 1-3 shows the environmental concerns related to hazardous materials at the reserve center. The facility is staffed by seven full-time Navy personnel and supports up to 90 reservists for training and exercises. The Pacific Grove Fire Department also uses the parking lot at the facility for fire training (that does not require flammable materials or chemical extinguishers) on the weekends. Surrounding land uses are shown on Figure 1-3. The facility is scheduled to be closed as a Naval Reserve Center on June 30, 1994.
1.6 OFF-BASE PROPERTY OR OTHER TENANTS
There are no off-base properties associated with, or other tenants at the NRC Pacific Grove.
1.7 HAZARDOUS WASTES/SUBSTANCES GENERATED ON SITE
Activities associated with the NRC Pacific Grove have historically generated paint wastes and required storage of diesel fuel. The 2,500-gallon underground storage tank for diesel fuel was removed in 1990, and no releases from the tank were found. Small quantities (up to 10 gallons) of paint and paint wastes are stored on the property. No releases have been documented or suspected from the storage unit. Demolition debris located along the eastern side of the property may or may not contain friable asbestos, according to the Environmental Baseline Survey (EBS). c:\Rcports, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 1994 1-6
TABLE 1-1
BASE CLOSURE PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
BCT Members
Name Title Phone
Larry Lind BRAC Environmental Coordinator/Navy Project Manager (415) 244-2527 To be determined U.S. EPA BRAC Cleanup Team Representative Chien Kao Cal. EPA/DTSC BRAC Cleanup Team Representative (415) 540-3822 Other Key Participants
Cdr. A1 Elkins DoD Base Transition Coordinator (415) 395-3920 Baha Zarah WESTDIV Compliance (415)- 244-2519
Todd Greene WESTDIV EBS (415) 244-2588
Mary Doyle WESTDIV NEPA (415) 244-3727
Deidre Nurre U.S. EPA Reuse Representative (415) 744-2360 Diana Peebler Cal. EPA Reuse Representative (916) 255-2125 Doug Pomeroy WESTDIV Endangered Species Manager (415) 244-3178 Lou Wall WESTDIV Cultural Resources Manager (415) 244-3179 Michael Martin California Department of Fish and Game CERCLA/NRDA Project Director
(408) 649-2870
Karen Miller U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Representative (415) 978-4866 Steve Schwarzbach U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Natural Resources Trustee (916) 978-4613 Contractors
Agency Affiliation
PRC Environmental
Management, Inc.
WESTDIV BCP Coordinator (415) 543-4880
ERM West WESTDIV EBS Preparation (510) 946-0455
Shawnee, Inc. EBS Preparation Consultant (510) 654-9309 c:\Repcrts, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 1994
1-7
( (
TABLE 1-2
mSTORY OF INSTALLATION OPERATIONS
(
Map Area Reference
Associated Hazardous
Substance
No.
Period Type of Operation (See Figure 1-2)
1952-1963 Air Intercept Training facility Diesel fuel 1 1963-1974 Fleet Numerical Weather facility Diesel fuel 1 1974 Naval Reserve Center Diesel fuel, paints 2 -1994
TABLE 1-3
HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATING ACTIVITIES TABLE
Name of
Facility (Bldg.) Unit Activity Waste Material Disposition Diesel storage Diesel fuel Removed; closure
completed
Underground storage tank UST
Flammable material storage cabinet Storage unit Waste storage Paint Active; no releases ( c:\Repora. SS PGNRC.BCP, Much 1994 1-8
\
Pacific Ocean
1-9
2.0 PROPERTY DISPOSAL AND REUSE PLAN
2.1 STATUS OF DISPOSAL PLANNING PROCESS
The disposal of the NRC Pacific Grove property will involve three interrelated activities:
implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, development of a disposal plan, and development of a community reuse plan. Each of these activities will be completed to support closure of the reserve center. The first two will be carried out by the Navy, while the Community Reuse Committee (CRC) will complete the third task.
Other federal agencies and a local government agency have expressed interest in potential reuse. A community reuse plan has not been developed, but may consist of proposed reuse by the City of Pacific Grove Parks and Recreation Department. The reuse plan is limited because of the small site of the facility and the lack of a variety of public interest groups.
Planning and execution of the NEPA process for disposal and reuse of the reserve center has not been undertaken to date. However, an NEPA document, as required, shall be completed by the closure date. The status of the reuse parcels is listed in Table 2-1.
2.2 RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS
Property disposal and reuse are closely linked to environmental investigations, restoration, and compliance activities for two reasons:
Federal property transfers to nonfederal parties are governed by CERCLA Section 120(h)(3)(B)(i)
Residual contamination may remain on certain properties after remedial actions have been completed or put into place, thereby restricting the future use of those properties The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Section 120(h)(3)(B)(i) requires that deeds for transfer of previously contaminated federal property c:\Rqxra, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 199« 2-1
TABLE 2-1
REUSE PARCEL DATA SUMMARY
Parcel Buildings Current Use Features
1 56 Reserve Center Operations Paved Parking Lot
2 Vacant Open Area Undeveloped Property
=
c:\Repora, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 1994
2-2
contain a covenant that all remedial actions necessary to protect human health and the environmental have been taken.
The requirement for complying with CERCLA 120(h) and the possibility of residual contamination are considered in the property disposal and reuse process at the NRC Pacific Grove. These two factors will be summarized to provide an approximate timetable for transfer by deed of each parcel at the NRC Pacific Grove.
The NRC Pacific Grove property disposal strategy and schedule is designed to streamline and expedite the necessary response actions in order to facilitate the earliest possible disposal and reuse activities. Because areas suitable for transfer must be delineated from those that are not, the environmental group has developed an environmental-condition-of-property map for the center using, in part, data from the EBS. This environmental-condition-of-property map shows both contaminated areas and areas of no suspected contamination, and the relationship of these areas to disposal and reuse parcels.
2.3 PROPERTY TRANSFER METHODS
Several mechanisms exist for property transfer of parcels at Pacific Grove. Parcels may be identified for transfer based on a Finding of Suitability to Lease (FOSL) or a Finding of Suitability to Transfer (FOST). These mechanisms will be developed and incorporated as the closure process continues; however, there is currently not enough available data to present any property transfer scenarios. The following summary outline details the required policy that will be followed as the FOSL/FOST process continues.
2.3.1 FOSL Review Process Policy Summary
All real property will be assessed by the appropriate Navy representative to determine the properties suitable for outleasing. This assessment will be based on the EBS determination of the environmental condition of property.
c:\Repons, SS
PGNRC.BCP, Much 1994 2-3
The EBS considered all sources of available significant environmental information. The analysis was conducted for all real property for the facility. The EBS included:
Detailed search and review of all available, applicable Navy and other federal agency records.
Review of obtainable federal, state and local records for each adjacent facility where there has been a release of any hazardous substance
Analysis of aerial photographs.
Interviews with current and/or former employees involved with past operations.
Visual inspections of the real property for identification of equipment, structural and environmental conditions.
Identification of contamination sources on the facility and adjacent properties.
Identification of ongoing response actions at or adjacent to the property.
Physical inspection of adjacent property.
Sampling (if appropriate).
Following completion of the EBS, the evaluation process has been documented in the EBS report.
This document reported the findings of the previously identified activities and provided an evaluation of the suitability of the property for lease for any identified reuse options.
After completion of the EBS and any appropriate local community reuse plans, the Navy will sign a FOSL if it is determined that the property is suitable for lease for the intended purpose. Although aFOSL determination has been made, an actual lease cannot occur until all environmental documentation requirements under NEPA have been completed. Consultations to meet the requirements of the Endangered Species Act and the National Historic Preservation Act are alsorequired prior to leasing. The property must reach at least one of the following criteria to be determined suitable for leasing:
c:\Rcpora, SS
PGNRC.BCP. March 1994 2-4
Hazardous substance notice need not be given because no hazardous substances or petroleum products were stored for one year or more, known to have been released, treated or disposed of.
Hazardous substance notice will be given for the type and quantity of substances if storage, treatment and/or disposal took place but the property is no longer contaminated.
The property contains some level of contamination and notice will be given to the lessee and the appropriate government agencies. However, this property can be used pursuant to the proposed lease, with the specified use restrictions in the lease. 2,3.2 FOST Policy Summary
The DoD policy for FOST of property has not been finalized. When available, the FOST policy will be incorporated into the revised BCP.
2.3.3 Potential Transfers of Pacific Grove Property
2.3.3.1 Federal Transfer of Property
As of January 1994 there are no plans for transfer of the property between federal agencies. Several federal agencies, however, have expressed an interest in the property, including:
Department of the Army, California Army National Guard, 223rd Military Intelligence Battalion (linguist)
Department of the Army, Headquarters, California Medical Detachment U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration:
National Marine Fisheries Service - Pacific Fisheries Environmental Group, National Ocean Service - Monterey Bay National Sanctuary Office and National Weather Service
U.S. Department of Education, Federal Real Property Assistance Program, Western Zone
c:\Reports, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 1994
2-5
2.3.3.2 No-Cost Public Benefit Conveyance
As of January 1994, no parcels or utilities and roads have been transferred by a no-cost public benefit
conveyance. An interest in the property has been expressed by the city of Pacific Grove through the National Park Service public park and recreation conveyance program (40 U.S.C. 484 {k}{2}).
c:\Reports, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 1994
2-6
3.0 INSTALLATION-WIDE ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM STATUS
This chapter summarizes the current status of environmental compliance activities at the NRC Pacific Grove. It also summarizes the status of community involvement in environmental programs and describes the environmental condition and suitability for transfer of the base property. The following chapters describe the current status of compliance projects, and the installation-wide contaminant source discovery and assessment status.
3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM STATUS
Because of the limited operations at the NRC Pacific Grove there are no industrial processes that require use of hazardous materials or that result in the generation of hazardous wastes. The Installation Restoration program has not been implemented at this facility. A number of mission-related compliance activities have been implemented, however, and limited closure-related compliance requirements were identified during the program review. In addition, the environmental condition of property has been evaluated under the basewide EBS.
3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAM STATUS
The status of the compliance activities at the NRC Pacific Grove has been reviewed. An UST was successfully removed under supervision by the county regulatory agency, and demolition debris has been identified at the site that may contain asbestos.
3.2.1 Storage Tanks
EPA is currently reviewing the UST program implemented by the state of California, which has delegated program compliance and enforcement responsibility to the regional water quality control boards and local implementing agencies (specifically, to the Monterey County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health, for the Naval reserve center). While EPA may enforce the federal regulations under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the state c:\Repora, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 199« 3-1
regulatory program implemented under Chapter 16 of the California Health and Safety Code is the primary regulatory and enforcement authority in use in California.
A single-wall steel underground storage tank used to supply diesel fuel to the emergency generator formerly located at the reserve center was removed by the Navy construction contractor, The Don Chapin Company, Inc., on October 25, 1990. The tank was removed under permit 509-899 issued by the Monterey County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health. Analysis of soil samples collected during the removal did not indicate a release of petroleum hydrocarbons.
3.2.2 Hazardous Materials/Waste Management
The NRC Pacific Grove is a conditionally exempt small quantity hazardous waste generator, and is not required to comply with interim status or permitting requirements under RCRA. Currently there is one flammable material storage cabinet in the paved area east of the reserve center building, whichis used to store wastes and product. There is no available information indicating that any hazardous wastes or hazardous constituents have been released at the facility.
3.2.3 Solid Waste Management
Solid waste generated by the reserve center is currently transported off base for disposal at a local landfill. No solid waste other than radar tower structure demolition debris, has been disposed of at the reserve center.
3.2.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
There is only one electrical transformer at the facility. This transformer is property of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the electrical utility for the facility. The manufacturer’s identification plate on the transformer indicates that this equipment does not contain polychlorinated biphenyls. c:\Reporu, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 199« 3-2
c c
resource trustees that a release has occurred so that the co-trustees can coordinate assessment, investigation and planning. One of the primary goals of coordinating with all natural resource trustees throughout the RI/FS process is to ensure that the site-wide Record of Decision addresses both remediation and restoration of natural resources. If this goal is reached in cooperation with trustees, remedial actions fully protective of the environment are likely to be implemented. This would make an assessment of natural resources damages and demand for compensation by state trustees less likely. As a matter of policy, federal agencies generally do not pursue Natural Resource Damage Assessments against each other, as no demand for damages is enforceable against another federal agency. States may pursue Natural Resource Damage Assessments against federal agencies.
The appropriate extent of involvement for federal agencies with state agencies which may be pursuing Natural Resource Damage Assessments against them is an unresolved policy question at this time.
The reserve center property has not been evaluated for the presence of threatened or endangered species. The disturbed habitat of the reserve center, and the abundance of iceplant, make it unlikely that these species are present at the reserve center. The presence or absence of these species will be evaluated in more detail in the NEPA document for reuse of the naval reserve center.
KJ 3.3.1 Sensitive Habitats
The current status of rare or sensitive habitats will be determined during the NEPA evaluation of threatened or endangered species at the reserve center. The current status of federal and California threatened and endangered species should also be determined. If endangered species are documented at the reserve center property, the areas of occurrence may require designation as critical habitat.
Management of any endangered species would be conducted under a consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as required under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act.
3.3.2 Archaeo10^ Resources
The entire property has been graded by heavy equipment. The western half of the site is currently covered by paved parking, the reserve center building, and paved and unpaved recreation areas. The eastern half has been trenched at least five times for the installation of underground utilities, and c:\Reporo, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 1994
3-4
3.2.5 Asbestos
Asbestos-containing material (ACM) is regulated by EPA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the state of California. According to construction contracting documents at WESTDIV, asbestos floor tile was installed in Room 100 of the reserve center building in 1974, under contract N52474-C-3273. In 1990, asbestos was removed from ceiling panels, wall panels, and grout. Asbestos present in textured ceilings and piping installation was encapsulated to prevent the asbestos from becoming loose or friable. A comprehensive asbestos survey is scheduled for 1994, prior to facility closure. Preliminary results of the EBS did not exclude the possibility of ACM in the construction debris associated with the former radar antennae towers at the eastern side of the property. The debris was probably deposited when the air intercept facility closed in 1963.
3.2.6 Radon
Radon levels have been assessed at the NRC Pacific Grove under the guidance of the Navy Radon Assessment and Mitigation Program (NAVRAMP). These program resulted in placement of 10 detectors at the facility. The detectors have been collected and sent to an analytical laboratory.
Results are expected to be available in the first quarter of 1994.
3.3 NATURAL RESOURCES
The NRC Pacific Grove has extremely limited natural resources associated with previously developed areas west of the reserve center building. The area west of the building is currently vegetated primarily with non-native iceplant, and several pieces of concrete rubble are present on the site.
As stated in the National Contingency Plan (NCP) Subpart G, Trustees for Natural Resources §300.600 the Department of Defense is designated a trustee for natural resources located on, over, or under the federal land the department manages. As a trustee the Navy is authorized to act pursuant to section 107(f) of CERCLA or section 311(f)(5) of the Clean Water Act when there is injury to, destruction of, loss of, or threat to natural resources as a result of a release of a hazardous substance or a discharge of oil. CERCLA Section 104(b)(2) requires notification of federal and state natural c:\Repora, SS
PGNRC.BCP. Much 1994 3-3
portions are covered by concrete pads installed as foundation for radar antennae. The antennae have since been removed. A preliminary survey by a professional archaeologist found no evidence of prehistoric occupation.
3.3.3 Historical Structures
There are no historic structures on the property. The reserve center building is a concrete block building erected in 1952. None of its uses (air intercept training facility, weather support facility, and reserve center) would be significant enough to qualify it for inclusion in the National Register as a Cold War resource.
3.3.4 Native American Resources
There is currently no information indicating that there are any Native American interests in the reserve center.
3.3.5 Paleontological Resources
There is currently no information indicating that there are any paleontological resources present at the reserve center, nor does regional geologic information indicate that fossiliferous strata are present on the property. The entire surface of the property is undertaken by sandy soil.
3.3.6 Wetlands, Surface Waters and Flood Plains
Site visits and topographic maps reveal no wetlands, possible wetland areas, surface waters or flood plain areas at the reserve center. However, due to the proximity of the NRC Pacific Grove to the Pacific Ocean, the property is within the jurisdiction of the California Coastal Commission. The California Coastal Commission has the authority to review and approve or deny any proposed land use changes in the regulated area.
c:\Rcpora. SS
PGNRC.BCP. Much 1994 3-5
3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION OF PROPERTY
In order to prepare an environmental-condition-of-property map, base property must be screened according to seven area types. The screening must be sufficiently detailed to ensure that the categories are accurate. These seven area types or categories are as follows:
1) Areas where no storage, release or disposal of hazardous substances or petroleum products has occurred (including no migration of these substances from adjacent areas).
2) Areas where only storage of hazardous substances or petroleum products has occurred (but no release, disposal, or migration from adjacent areas has occurred). 3) Areas where storage, release, disposal and/or migration of hazardous substances or petroleum products have occurred, but at concentrations that do not require removal or remedial action.
Areas where storage, release disposal and/or migration of hazardous substances or petroleum products have occurred, and all remedial actions necessary to protect human health and the environment have been taken.
4)
Areas where storage, release, disposal and/or migration of hazardous substances or petroleum products has occurred, removals and/or remedial actions are underway, but all required remedial actions have not yet been taken.
5)
Areas where storage, release, disposal, and/or migration of hazardous substances or petroleum products has occurred, but required response actions have not yet been implemented.
6)
7) Areas that are unevaluated or require additional evaluation.
A map showing the environmental condition of reserve center property has been developed for the EBS. The parcel boundaries are shown on the site layout map in Figure 1-1. The two parcels designated during the EBS were both placed in property type number 7 (ERM-West, 1994). The EBS indicated that parcel 1 had ACM in the building, and that results of the NAVRAMP radon study are not yet available. The text also states, however, that the asbestos remaining in the building at parcel 1 is not friable, and that the condition of the building is suitable for immediate reuse.
Parcel 2 is also placed in property type 7 in the EBS because of potential ACM in the demolition c:\Repora, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 1994
3-6
debris at the former radar antennae foundations. The EBS also identified possible deed disclosures consisting of endangered species, easement and deed restrictions. While these factors may need to be incorporated into the reuse process, they do not indicate the presence of contamination that may affect the environmental condition of property based on waste disposal or releases at the reserve center.
3.4.1 Suitability of Installation Property for Transfer by Deed The EBS has identified potential ACM in demolition debris at the eastern portion of the site as the only potential environmental contamination that could affect transfer of the property. Other environmental concerns include proposed and listed endangered plant species that may be present at the facility. If endangered species are identified, any property reuse will comply with all applicable laws.
3.5 STATUS OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
No community relations activities have taken place at the NRC Pacific Grove. c:\Repora, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 1994 3-7
4.0 INSTALLATION-WIDE STRATEGY FOR ENYIR ONMENTAL RESTORATION This chapter describes and summarizes the installation-wide environmental compliance strategy developed for the NRC Pacific Grove. Before the official closure date of June 30, 1994, the EBS will be completed to identify any environmental contamination at the reserve center.
The strategy for closure of the reserve center must address two areas of concern: the potential for ACM in demolition debris and the possible presence of sensitive natural resources on the base property.
4.1 - COMPLIANCE STRATEGY
In order to complete compliance activities at the NRC Pacific Grove, the presence of ACM in demolition debris should be determined through testing of the material. Compliance activities include sampling and testing of debris for ACM, and characterization and removal of the debris if ACM is determined to be present. Based on the results of the EBS, the area to be characterized should be identified. Once the site has been characterized, if ACM is identified, a removal action will be planned and implemented. Because of the small quantity (less than 10 gallons) of hazardous material and paint waste stored in the flammable material cabinet, no compliance activity will be required other than proper removal and disposal of the unit contents.
4.2 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES STRATEGY
4.2.1 Natural Resources
Upon disestablishment of the NRC Pacific Grove, WESTDIV will become responsible for caretaking of all natural resources at the facility until the property is transferred out of Navy ownership. No active natural resource management activities currently occur at the NRC Pacific Grove, and none are anticipated prior to reuse decisions. Therefore, the only compliance strategy that currently appears necessary for natural resources at the NRC Pacific Grove is to address potential impacts to natural resources from different reuse alternatives as part of the NEPA documentation for reuse of the c:\Repans. SS
PGNRC.BCP. March 1994
4-1
facility. This is likely to require a sensitive plant species survey for threatened and endangered species.
4.2.2 Rare or Sensitive Habitat
The presence of rare or sensitive habitat has not been determined at the reserve center. A habitat survey will be performed to delineate the sensitive or rare habitat at the base.
4.3 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT STRATEGY
Because environmental restoration activities have not been required, and because only limited compliance activities are required to support closure of NRC Pacific Grove, a community relations program is not applicable. The community has expressed an interest in reuse of the facility, and reuse issues will be communicated to the local community by the Base Transition Coordinator. c:\Repora, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 1994 4-2
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM MASTER SCHEDULES
This chapter presents the master schedule of anticipated activities that make up the installation’s environmental programs. This schedule was developed to support regulatory compliance activities and compliance with natural resource requirements.
5.1 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
5.1.1 Environmental Compliance Schedule
The compliance schedule is shown in Figure 5-1. The testing of demolition debris for.ACM is the only remaining compliance item to be completed.
5.1.2 Environmental Compliance Requirements by Fiscal Year A preliminary cost estimate has been developed for environmental compliance activities at Pacific Grove. The current estimate for total response cost estimate for ACM compliance tasks is presented in Appendix A. Based on the schedule developed for the compliance program, it is anticipated that all program elements could be completed in fiscal year 1994. Delays or adjustments to the schedule may result in some expenditures, in the first quarter of fiscal 1995.
5.2 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
5.2.1 Natural and Cultural Resources Schedule
The natural and cultural resources schedule for the NRC Pacific Grove is shown in Figure 5-1. The endangered species survey is the major item remaining to be completed, and will be performed for NEPA compliance of closure at the facility.
c:\R
PGNRCJBCP, March 199« 5-1
5.2.2 Natural and Cultural Resources Requirements by Fiscal Year Fiscal requirements for evaluation of natural resource issues have been estimated, based on the ecological areas of concern identified at the site. The cost estimate information is included in Appendix A. Because of the limited scope of action, all expenditures could be completed in one fiscal year. Current funding constraints indicate that there is no funding available for base closure activities at NRC Pacific Grove during fiscal years 1994 and 1995. If the funding is available in fiscal year 1996, all activities could be completed in that financial period. The current estimate for completion of all base closure activities is $55,000.
5.3 MEETING SCHEDULE
Meetings are to be scheduled as required by the applicable process or as mandated by the federal facilities agreement. Meetings are typically held as follows:
BCT Meetings - As needed to resolve issues and make decisions regarding environmental concerns to support the reuse process as applicable. •-
Technical/Issue Resolution Meetings - As necessary to facilitate continued progress of the compliance and natural resource activities.
•-
c:\Reports, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 1994
5-2
Figure 5-1 . Environmental Program Schedules for Pacific Grove Naval Reserve Center
Unconstrained Program Schedules
April 1994 March June 1994 1994
May 1994
Asbestos
Evaluation
SOW Development A A
Contractor
Work Plan A A
Preparation/
Mobilization A A
Site Assessment AT -A
ui Navy Rreview AT A
Removal Action
Mobilization
Fieldwork
A -A
Natural Resources
Evaluation
SOW Development A A
Work Plan
Preparation
A A
Field Surveys A A
Report Preparation A A
Figure 5-1. Environmental Program Schedules for Pacific Grove Naval Reserve Center (Continued)
Constrained Program Schedules
October 1995 November 1995 December 1995 January 1996
Asbestos
Evaluation
SOW Development A A
Contractor
Work Plan A A
Preparation/
Mobilization A A
Site Assessment A A
Ut
Navy Rreview A
Removal Action
Mobilization
Fieldwork
A A
Natural Resources
Evaluation
SOW Development A A
Work Plan
Preparation
A A
Field Surveys A A
Report Preparation A A
6.0 TECHNICAL AND OTHER ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED
This chapter summarizes technical and other issues that are yet to be resolved. These issues include information management; the usability of historical data; data gaps; natural (background) levels of elements and compounds in soil, groundwater, surface water, and sediments; risk assessment; state cleanup standards; and program initiatives to complete cleanup requirements as required to meet property transfer schedules.
6.1 DATA GAPS
This chapter summarizes unresolved issues pertaining to the determination and collection of data needed to complete the environmental compliance program at the NRC Pacific Grove.
6.1.1 BRAC Cleanup Team Action Items
A work plan should be developed for characterization of demolition debris to determine whether ACM is present in the debris. The BCT should approve the scope of the ACM investigation and review the results to determine whether removal of demolition debris will be required.
Once data gaps are filled, appropriate response measures, if needed, can be developed to eliminate any hazard associated with ACM at the reserve center. This information will also facilitate the confirmation of clean areas at the base. In support of the base cleanup, the BRAC cleanup team will meet to resolve data gap issues prior to the execution of additional field work. This coordination process will continue as an integral part of the execution of the compliance program at the NRC Pacific Grove.
6.2 IDENTIFICATION OF CLEAN PROPERTIES
Clean properties at the base will be identified after the evaluation of potential ACM has been completed. The status of clean properties will be also be updated if ACM is found and removed at the base.
c:\Repora. SS
PGNRC.BCP. March 1994 6-1
6.3 UPDATING THE EBS AND NATURAL/CULTURAL RESOURCES
DOCUMENTATION
The presence of proposed or listed endangered species will be determined by a survey to be conducted at the base. This will be performed as part of the NEPA evaluation of facility closure. If endangered species are documented at the base, a management plan and property use restrictions will be developed to protect these species. These activities will be conducted under consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
6.4 IMPLEMENTING THE POLICY FOR ON-SITE DECISION MAKING An obstacle to on-site decision making is the lack of sufficient support from regulatory‘agencies, particularly the natural resource trustees, such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game. Additional resources from within these agencies, or via fund transfers for the Department of the Navy, must occur to provide adequate staffing to make on-site decision making a workable alternative. This is less critical for closure of the NRC Pacific Grove than for other locations because of the limited natural resources at this facility.
An EPA BRAC Cleanup Team representative should be designated to participate in the closure planning process and provide agency concurrence in environmental decision making at the site.
6.5 FUNDING CONSTRAINTS
Currently available budgeting information indicates that no resources have been allocated for environmental activities related to base closure in fiscal years 1994 and 1995. If these activities are not funded until fiscal year 1996, property transfers cannot be executed, and the facility will have to remain in caretaker status from the closure date of June 30, 1994 until the closure activities are completed in the first quarter of fiscal 1996. Funding sources and schedules should be reviewed, and the appropriate funding and schedules for base closure activities at NRC Pacific Grove should be determined.
c:\Repora. SS
PGNRC.BCP. March 1994 6-2
( c
7.0 REFERENCES (
ERM-West 1994. Basewide Environmental Baseline Survey for Navy Reserve Center - Pacific Grove. January 7.
PRC 1993. Site visit performed by Stuart Strum. December 8.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 1993. Letter to Coast Guard Concerning Management and protection of endangered and Candidate Plants in Point Pinos Lighthouse Area, Monterey County, California. February 9.
United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1980. Topographic Map, Monterey Quadrangle. (
'i
( c:\Repcra. SS PGNRC.BCP, March 1994 7-1
J m
D E T A S H O R E I E S ( FART 1 ) I L E D I N V E N T »_ A V o F N A V A L 3 0 SEPT 1013 RESERVE CENTER . PACIFIC DROVE CALIFORNIA ( CLAIMANT ..N V RES P OR ) WESTDI V TYPE /STATUS . . ACTIVE NON - NEAREST CITY ..MONTEREY INOUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES PRODUCT /FUNCTION..RESERVE TRAINING CENTER OPERATOR .... INITIALLY OCCUPIED . 10B2 ACTIVITY CODE..BS0SS10 LAND
INGRANTEO
ACRES ESTIMATED
VALUE
OWNEO
INGRANTED
ACRES
ACRES OWNEO
ACRES
COST
TO GOVT
CCN
IMPROVEO
SEMI- IMP
A . as •
4.2S
11 LAND - FEE
TOTAL 0
UNI
OTHER 4 . as
OUTGRANTEO
BUILDINGS
OWNEO
CPV
( OOO )
OWNEO
CPV
( OOO|
BTMCR / m
NAVALT BLOC
OTHER / #
NAVALT BLOG
CCN COST
TO GOVT
COST SO FT
TO GOVT
CCN SO FT
SEMI- 420 32T PERM
42032?
2SSS
2BSS
171 TRAINING BLOCS 1
TOTAL
1 1220
1 1220
•3PN
1 420327 2SSS 11220 1 EXCESS
STRUCTURES /UTILITIES
OWNEO OWNED
CPV
( OOO )
OTHER /
NAVALT
OTHER /
NAVALT
COST
TO GOVT - ( OOO )
COST CCN CPV AREA
TO GOVT
CCN AREA
2MI S 42 WATER OIST - POT
SB1 ROADS
SB3 WALKS PARKING
S 72 FENCE /WALL / TWR
4000
730
300
1BOO
13S COMMS LINES 23
012 ELEC TMSN /OISTR
S 24 HEAT /GAS /7MSN
531 SEWAGE TRTSDSP
532 SEWAGE / COLLECT
4BOO
4800
BOO
•72
4 7B
2B
4 270SV
2340SV
27 1OOO LF
B 4 SOLF 1
7 1SOOLF
3 a S O L F
AREAS AND USERS
STATE /
COUNTRY SIC
OWNEO 4
CPV BLOC
ACTIVE /
1NACT
CLASS 1
COST
CLASS 2
AREA CITY COUNTY ACRES SO FT COST
MAIN SITE A PACIFIC DROVE MONTEREY CA S 4.2S 11220 1
USERS.. IFIC GROVE CA N S2 2B7 H / T « 0 4.20 11220 447104 20SBB7S ACTIVITY TOTAL 4.as 11220 447104 2 1
ACTtVIfY TYPE LOCATION
PACIFIC GROVE CALIFORNIA
UI C F ICNE P A G1
N S2 2 S7
EFD
WEST
ACTIVITY TITLE
PACIFIC GROVE 42 S 1 JJ
U
s
t
*
U.
Fit** D E T A I L E D I N V E N T O R Y 0 P N A V A L S H O R E I E S tPART 2 ) 3 0 S E F T 1 9 1 3 RESERVE CENTER, PACIFIC GROVE CALIFORNIA tCLAIMANT . . NVAESPOR ) WESTDI V
C H E N
B 0 0 S 0
A U N U T N
C U 0 N H t
0 s
L E R N
E T C X E U
1 0 0 C C M
N E O B
D S R E
T S O R
r N M
C A T E G O R Y T A I E W A U L
S G C R A H R N C M T
C O O E D E S C R I P T I O N C 1
F A C
COST ACC TYPE
C 0 G R
H Y
T S
S s A 0 T 0 P E R A I B U
MAINT 0 L T N TO T T
/ T R G E 0
T V
0 T
V N E R L E L E S
( 000) T A / T G H H Y R E
USER ( N 82267 ) ...NAVRESCEN PACIFIC GROVE CA
taStO COMM LINES
SAtO UTIL
ItSA P N 14 4S00 26 1.SOMt A 203111
135 COMMS LINES TOTAL 4500 26 1. B O M I
17115 RESV TRAIN BLOG 1653 P N 14
7110 BLOG
421327 2S S 6 11220 SP •5 2 1 2 A •3 PN Bt 203100 BA
171 TRAINING BLDGS TOTAL 42 t327 2BBB 11220 SP 13 PN
B 1230 ELEC OISTR LINE 1 BB3 P N 14
7710 UTIL
4B00 27 100B L P A 203108
812 ELEC TMSN /01STR TOTAL 4500 27 1006 LF
B2410 GAS MAINS
7770 UTIL
1 6 5 8 P N 1 4 BOO 0 4 80 LP A 203106
824 NEAT /GAS /TMSN TOTAL 900 5 480 L P
83130 SEPTC TK/ON FLO 1984 S N 14
7670 UTIL
672 3800 GA 14 3 I A 203103 AO
831 SEWAGE TRTAOSP TOTAL 8 7« 3
83210 SANITARY SEWER 1984 S N 14 2SO
7780 UTIL
4 7 8 3 LP A 203110
832 SEWAGE /COLLECT TOTAL 478 3 250 L P
64210 WTR /D1ST /LN/POT 1984 P N 14
7740 UTIL
4000 23 BOO L P A 203107
842 WATER OIST - FOT TOTAL 4000 2 3 800 L P
85110 ROAOS 1980 S N 14 270 SY A
7310 STRC
7 3 0 4 203102
681 ROAOS TOTAL 730 4 270 SY W
68210 PARKING AREA
7380 STRC
1 9 8 3 P N 1 4 2360 ST 0 203112
88220 StOEWALR
7360 STRC
1960 F N 14 300 80 SY A 203101
IMG TOTAL 300 2 3 6 0 S Y
87210 SCRTV PNCE /WALL 1690 P N 14
78 LO STRC
1600 7 1600 LF 3 203104
672 FENCE /WALL / TWR TOTAL 1600 7 1800 L P
91140 LANO 100001 - CONDIMNA 1
LAND
N 17 4.24AC
911 LAND*PEE TOTAL 4.28AC
RENT PD - SUBTOTAL O 0 RENT RECO * •O ** 60VC0ST- 4 4 7 1 0 4 C P V - 2 6 8 8 8 7 6 L C P V * ACTIVITY TOTAL RENT PD * O RENT RECO * 0 *•* GOVCOST * 4 4 7 1 0 4 C P Y - 288BS7S LCP V - 0 ACTIV t t Y TVPE
RESERVE CENTER
A C T I V I T Y T I T L E
P A C I F I C GROVE
EPD PICHE PAGE
WEST
UIC
N 8 2 2 6 7
LOCATION
P A C I F I C GROVE CALIFORNIA 42 83 2
s
a.i
( (
TABLE 1-2
HISTORY OF INSTALLATION OPERATIONS
Map Area Reference
Associated Hazardous
Substance
No.
Period Type of Operation (See Figure 1-2)
1952-1963 Air Intercept Training facility Diesel fuel 1 1963-1974 Fleet Numerical Weather facility Diesel fuel 1 1974-1994 Naval Reserve Center Diesel fuel, paints 2
( TABLE 1-3
HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATING ACTIVITIES TABLE
Name of
Facility (Bldg.) Unit Activity Waste Material Disposition Diesel storage Diesel fuel Removed; closure
completed
Underground storage tank UST
Flammable material storage cabinet Storage unit Waste storage Paint Active; no releases c:\Repcro, SS
PGNRC.BCP, March 1994 1-8
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL RESERVE READINESS COMMAND
REGION TWENTY
BUILDING 1
NAVAL STATION TREASURE ISLAND
SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA 94130-5032 IN REPLY REFER TO:
4101
Ser 08/g
DEC 5 1 1992
Commander, Naval Reserve Readiness Command Region Twenty Commanding Officer, Naval Reserve Center, Pacific Grove From:
To:
Subj: ENERGY CONSERVATION REPORT FY-92
Ref: (a) COMNAVRESFORINST 4100.2B
Enel: ( 1 ) Reserve Center Energy Consumption Report FY-92 (2) Reserve Center Energy Graph from baseline (FY-85)
to present by quarter
(3) Reserve Center FY-92 Energy Usage Graphs by month
1. Reference (a) requires that all Naval Reserve Centers reduce energy consumption 12 percent by FY-95.
2. Enclosures (1 ) through (3), were prepared using information provided to this command via monthly DEIS reports. A consolidated FY-92 REDCOM 20 decrease of 9.50 percent is indicated.
3. You are requested to analyze enclosures (1 ) through (3), and take action as necessary to ensure that your center complies with reference (a).
4. Your annual decrease of 23.5 percent has met the FY-92 reduction goal.
You are commended for vour efforts. Keep up the good work.
5. REDCOM 20 point of contact for any assistance in Energy conservation for your activity, EA1 M.L. Epperlv (Code 0811 ), may be reached at AV 475-3302 or Comm 415-395-3302.
M. . 0
'7* 1!N
'EPS
- rr;.
I T7S!N
1 f
_iB
i yjp T7/T
r i 7
RESERVE CENTER EKERGI CQHSUHPTIOH REPORT
Reserve Center: KRC Pacific Grove QIC: K62267 REDCOH 20 Total Bldg. Brea (current) = 11,220 Baseline Bldg Brea (FI 85) = 11.22G Percent Change Goal for FT 92 = -8.4 % (reduction from FI 85) EKERGI CORSOHPTIOB - FI 92
Katural Gas Fuel Oil
KBTD/SF(theras) KBTU/SF(gal)
Electical
KBTU/SF(ksh)
Total
RBTO/SF
Baseline Consumption, Oct 84
Current Consumption, Oct 91
Percent Change
Baseline Consumption, Kov 84
Current Consumption, Kov 91
Percent Change
Baseline Consumption, Dec 84
Current Consumption, Dec 91
Percent Change
Baseline Consumption, Jan 85
Current Consumption, Jan 92
Percent Change
Baseline Consumption, Feb 85 Current Consumption, Feb 92 Percent Change
Baseline Consumption, Mar 85
Current Consumption, Mar 92
Percent Change
Baseline Consumption, Apr 85
Current Consumption, Bpr 92
Percent Change
Baseline Consumption, Har 85
Current Consumption, Map 92
Percent Change
Baseline Consumption, Jun 85
Current Consumption, Jun 92
Percent Change
Baseline Consumption, Jul 85
Current Consumption, Jul 92
Percent Change
Baseline Consumption, Bug 85
Current Consumption, Bug 92
Percent Change
Baseline Consumption, Sep 85
Current Consumption, Sep 92
Percent Change
Baseline Consumption, FI 85
Current Consumption, FI 92
Percent Change
1.31 (4320) 1.35 4440
3.08 0.02 2! 0 (0 ; 1.33 0.52 58! 0 (0 1.87
t t 2500 40.68
I!) . 1.81 (5960' 1.31 (4320 0 0 0 1.81 1.45 163 0 2.76 - 27.6! + 52.58
ill 1.27 4160 1.57 5160 0 0 0 1.27 2.85 ( 320 0 4.42
t 23.6 t 248.08
2.57 ( 289) 3.57 ( 401) ill 2.43 (8000 1.57 (5160
- 35.48
0 5.00
0 5.14
t 38.98 t 2.88
3.58 ( 402) 0.54 61)
* 84.98 Cl 2.84 (9320 1.23 4040 0 6.42 0 1.77 - 56.7 - 72.48
2.56 (8400) 1.24 (4080)
- 51.68
9.18 1030 0 0 11.74
0.78 0 0 2.02
- 91.5’ - 82.88
1.39 (4560) 1.22 4000
- 12.28
0.28 32 0 (0 1.67 0.40
42.8!
45 0 (0 1.62
- 3.08
Cl 1.39 4560 1.26 4160 0.12 13; 0 1.51 0.12 13 0 1.38
9.4 - 8.68
0.71 (2320 0.86 2840
21.1’
0 0 0 (0 0.71 0.08 9! 0 (O ' 0.94
32.48 Cl 1.06 (3480' 1.39 (4560 31.18 0.10 11 0 1.16 0.24 27 0 1.63 + 140.08 + 40.58
0.94 (3080) 1.07 3520)
4 13.88 Cl 0.09 10: 0 1.03 0.25 28 0 1.32 » 177.88 28.28 Cl 0.85 2800 1.20 3960 0.12 14 0 0.97 0.37 ( 42 1.57
+ 208.38
0 41.2 61.88
(60,960) 16.07 (1803) (50,240 11.18 1255)
8 - 30.48
18.54 0 (0 34.61 15.28 0 (0 26.46
- 17.68 - 23.58
PACIFIC GROVE ENERGY GRAPH
m
IH
K I 111 P
B I
v 'i T V 1 ui 4M I sF I
11 1 i e
i : 1
I P i i
tr I
H 1 L
81 82 83 84
YEAR by quari*re
PACIFIC GROVE ELECTRICAL USAGE FY-92
SO 85 Baseline
92Actual
aI
Sep
MONTH
ITS
Asbestos, Lead and
Hazardous Materials
Inspection
1352 Lighthouse Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA
Prepared for:
U.S Department of Commerce/NOAA
Western Acquisitions Division
325 Broadway, SOU6
Boulder, CO 80305
Prepared by:
Aurora Industrial Hygiene
1132 Mission Street, Suite B
South Pasadena, CA 91030
Project #: 26180
Date of Inspection:
May 26, 2015
Date of Report:
June 29, 2015
Reviewed and Approved:____ _______________
GRACE M. RINCK, CIH, CAC, CDPH CERTIFIED
1132 Mission Street, Suite B South Pasadena, California 91030 (626) 403-4104
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
USE OF THIS REPORT.................................................................................................................................................... 3
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................... 4
2.0 ASBESTOS SAMPLING ............................................................................................................................................. 5 ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................................... 5 Assessing the Current Condition of the Material........................................................................................................... 5 Assessing the Potential for Disturbance ........................................................................................................................ 5 TABLE 2.1 ACM................................................................................................................................................................ 6
3.0 LEAD SAMPLING....................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.1 LEAD IN PAINT (XRF).................................................................................................................................................. 6
3.2 POSITIVE XRF PAINT SAMPLE DATA ............................................................................................................................ 7 XRF Positive Data Table .............................................................................................................................................. 7
4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................ 8
4.1 ACM........................................................................................................................................................................... 8
4.2 LBP AND LEAD CONTAINING COMPONENTS ................................................................................................................. 8 Outside of California.................................................................................................................................................... 9
4.3 OTHER HAZARDOUS WASTE INCLUDING UNIVERSAL WASTE AND POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS).................. 10 OBSERVED UNIVERSAL WASTE TABLE............................................................................................................................. 11
5.0 PHOTOGRAPHS ....................................................................................................................................................... 12
6.0 SAMPLE LOCATION DIAGRAMS......................................................................................................................... 19
7.0 COMPLETE ASBESTOS SAMPLING DATA TABLE........................................................................................... 25
8.0 COMPLETE XRF AND PAINT CHIP SAMPLING DATA TABLES.................................................................... 28
9.0 LABORATORY REPORTS AND CHAINS OF CUSTODY (COCS)..................................................................... 35
10.0 CERTIFICATIONS.................................................................................................................................................. 36 NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 2
USE OFTHIS REPORT
This report documents the findings and recommendations from building inspections conducted by Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc. The purpose of the inspection was to determine the existence of asbestos containing materials, lead, and other hazardous materials. The inspection was conducted at 1352 Lighthouse Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA 93950.
This report is intended to provide an understanding of the potential hazards that the property evaluated in this report may pose to human health due to asbestos building materials, lead, and other hazardous materials. This report is based primarily upon data and information obtained during site visits by Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc. (Aurora) to the property identified herein on May 26, 2015 and is based solely upon the condition of the property on the dates of such assessment. Field work was completed by Matt Froehlich, a California Certified Site Surveillance Technician (#02-3176) and a California Department of Public Health (CDPH) certified Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor (#13643) Glenn Gutierrez , a California Certified Site Surveillance Technician (#06-3991), and a California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Sample Technician (#20113). All work was completed under the supervision of Certified Industrial Hygienist and Certified Asbestos Consultant Grace M. Rinck (#93-0919).
The survey included:
• An initial investigation to locate suspect asbestos containing materials • The collection of bulk samples from suspect asbestos containing materials • An investigation to locate suspect lead-based paint
• Use of a portable x-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrum analyzer to test painted surfaces • Physical assessment of suspect materials
• Laboratory analysis of all collected suspect asbestos samples and paint chip samples. • A visual inspection for Universal Waste and Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB’s) Aurora has performed this work, made the findings, and proposed the recommendations described in this report in accordance with generally accepted environmental science practices for asbestos and lead environmental assessments in effect in the Southern California area at the time the work was performed. This warranty stands in lieu of all other warranties, expressed or implied. While this report can be used as a guide, it must be understood that it is neither a rejection nor an endorsement of the property. It must also be understood that changing circumstances in the environment and in the use of the property can alter radically the conclusions and information contained in this report.
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 3
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following materials were found to contain asbestos at greater than 1% and should be considered Asbestos Containing Material (ACM):
Material Material Locations Amount
Drywall/Joint Compound Rm 13 800 SF
Canvas Duct Connector Fan Room 8 LF
9x9 White VFT/Mastic Under Carpet @ 1st Floor Hallways, Rooms 2, 3, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18 3,550 SF
9x9 Black VFT/Mastic
Under Carpet @ Conference Room Top
Level, 2nd Floor Hallways, Rooms 20,
21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29
4,000 SF
12x12 White VFT/Mastic Conference Room @ Lower Area 700 SF Lead was detected in the following building components:
Room/Area Component
1st and 2nd Floor Office Doors and Door Frames
Men and women’s Restrooms Wall Tiles
Janitor Closet Janitor Sink
Other hazardous materials, including PCBs and Universal Wastes, may be present. Fluorescent ballasts were identified in the buildings. Freon in the HVAC systems, fluorescent light bulbs, fixtures, oil collection tanks used oil filters, new and used tires, hydraulic lifts, and electronics are also present.
Mercury may be present in thermostats. All hazardous materials should be removed and properly disposed of prior to demolition/renovation activities in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Div. 4.5, Chapter 23.
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 4
2.0 ASBESTOS SAMPLING
Aurora collected 56 bulk samples of building materials. Samples of drywall/joint compound, acoustic tile/mastic, etc., were separated into layers at the laboratory. The laboratory was instructed to stop analyses when a material was determined to be positive for asbestos. The samples were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) for Asbestos via EPA Method 600/R-93/116 “Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” by Environmental Microbiology Laboratory (EMLabP&K). Environmental Microbiology Laboratory is an EPA accredited laboratory located at 1010 N Central Avenue, Suite 420, Glendale, California 91202. Samples approximately 1 cubic centimeter (cc) in size were obtained using appropriate sampling equipment. The sampling area was misted with water to minimize the potential for the release of airborne fibers. Collected samples were placed in sealed plastic bags, labeled and transported under chain of custody for analysis.
Materials found to contain 1% of greater asbestos were identified as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs).
Asbestos Assessment Procedures
The physical assessment procedures used during this survey consisted of assessing: (1) the condition of the suspect material, and (2) the potential for future disturbance.
Assessing the Current Condition of the Material
Suspect asbestos material was placed in one of three categories based on a visual inspection: good, damaged, or significantly damaged. To aid in reliable and repeatable application of the three AHERA condition categories, rough quantitative measures of damage were used. If the damage or deterioration covered roughly one tenth (if evenly distributed) or one quarter (if localized) of the surface, or more, the suspect material was rated as being significantly damaged.
Assessing the Potential for Disturbance
The likelihood that the suspect asbestos material could be disturbed in the future is related to: (1) the frequency with which employees need to work near, or building occupants are in the vicinity of the material, (2) its location with respect to sources of vibration, and (3) the potential for air/water erosion.
These factors were used to classify the material with respect to its potential for disturbance. The categories are: potential for significant damage, potential for damage, and low potential.
The following table identifies the material found to contain asbestos. A complete table of all samples taken is provided in Section 7.
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 5 Table 2.1 ACM
Sample # Material Material Locations
Sample
Location Cond. DP Amount Result
526-14 Texture Coating1 Rm 13 Rm 13 Good Low 800 SF Texture 2%Chrysotile 526-30 Canvas Duct Connector Fan Room HVAC Seam Good Low 8 LF 40 % Chrysotile 526-48
9x9 White VFT/Mastic
Under Carpet @
1st Floor
Hallways, Rooms
2, 3, 12, 13, 14,
15, 17, 18
Hall 2 Good Low
3,550 SF
White VFT 2%
Chrys.
Black Mastic 2 %
Chrys.
526-49 Hall 3 Good Low
526-50 Rm 12 Good Low
526-51
9x9 Black VFT/Mastic
Under Carpet @
Conference
Room Top Level,
2nd Floor
Hallways, Rooms
20, 21, 22, 23, 24,
26, 27, 28, 29
Rm 29A Good Low
4,000 SF Black VFT 5%
Chrysotile
526-52 Rm 20 Good Low
526-53
Conf. Rm Top
Lvl. Good Low
526-54
12x12 White VFT/Mastic
Conference
Room @ Lower
Area
Conf. Rm
Lower Good Low
700 SF
White VFT 5%
Chrys.
Black Mastic 3%
Chrys.
526-55
Conf. Rm
Lower Good Low
526-56
Conf. Rm
Lower Good Low
3.0 LEAD SAMPLING
3.1 Lead in Paint (XRF)
A lead-based paint inspection was conducted using a portable x-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrum analyzer NITON instrument, (serial number 91830).
XRF readings were taken using the “Unlimited” mode of the NITON. “Unlimited” mode measurements have no predetermined testing length and automatically adjust to account for various types of substrates and materials densities. The precision of the XRF readings is proportional to the square root of the number of x-rays counted by the scanner. The longer the test, the higher the level of precision as compared against the set threshold of 0.7 mg/cm2 . No substrate correction is required for
testing using the “Unlimited” mode.
XRF readings were made on representative substrates. Testing combinations were tested non-destructively by holding the NITON against the surface being tested. At each XRF sample location the NITON shutter is opened, and one reading was made.
1 Sample 526-14 results indicated that the texture coating of the drywall system is positive for asbestos. This texture coating was present in Room 13.
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 6 To ensure that the XRF was working properly various quality control tests were performed before, during and after the on-site work. At the beginning of the workday, three start-up validation measurements were made in the “test” mode, using the calibration check standard associated with the NITON. This painted standard contains a known quantity of lead and allows the XRF operator to determine whether the instrument is functioning within acceptable tolerance ranges for accuracy and precision, as determined by the manufacturer.
In addition, calibration readings were taken on the red 1.02 mg/cm2 Standard Reference Material (SRM) paint film. Results of the Quality Control Calibration Check are included in the Attachments.
A reading of >0.7 mg/cm2 was considered positive for lead based paint, in accordance with Chapter 7 (revised, 1997) of the Housing and Urban Development Guidelines for Lead Based Paint Inspection and Los Angeles County.
3.2 Positive XRF Paint Sample Data
The following data table summarizes the positive XRF data (defined as equal to or greater than 0.7 mg/cm2
). A complete XRF Data Table is attached in Section 8.
XRF Positive Data Table2
Test
# Floor Room Side Component Substrate Color Cond. Pb Rep 144 1 North Stairwell B Door Frame Metal Beige Intact 12.70 1 149 1
South East
Stairwell Storage
Room
C Door Frame Metal White Intact 12.7 1
150 1
South East
Stairwell Storage
Room
C Door Metal White Intact 10.6 1
153 2 Rm 20A C Door Frame Metal White Intact 10.10 1
158 2 Rm 20 B Door Frame Metal White Intact 10.70 1
159 2 Rm 20 B Door Metal White Intact 8.20 1
160 2 Rm 20 B Window Frame Metal White Intact 12.30 1
161 2 Rm 20 C Door Frame Metal White Intact 2.40 1
168 2 Rm 21 B Door Frame Metal White Intact 4.90 1
175 2 Rm 22 B Door Frame Metal White Intact 3.20 1
202 2 Rm 25
(Conference) D Door Frame Metal White Intact 7.40 4
207 2 Rm 26A B Door Frame Metal White Intact 7.20 2
230 2 Rm 29 C Door Frame Metal White Intact 13.70 1
2 Side Identifies the side of the building tested: A faces Lighthouse (south) Cond. The condition of the paint was determined, as defined in the Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing:
Intact – the entire surface is intact.
Fair – less than or equal to ten percent of the total surface area of the component is deteriorated.
Poor – more than ten percent of the total surface area of the component is deteriorated.
Pb The reading displayed by the XRF in milligram per square centimeter.
Rep. Replications; the number of like components, if applicable.
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 7 Test
# Floor Room Side Component Substrate Color Cond. Pb Rep 242 2 Men's Restroom A Wall Tile (Toilet
Area)
Ceramic
Tile
Dark
Pink Intact 14.50 300
SF
252 2 Women's
Restroom B
Wall Tile
(Shower/Sink
Area)
Ceramic
Tile
Dark
Pink Intact 9.50 400
SF
257 2 Fan Room D Door Frame Metal Beige Intact 9.40 1
275 2 Janitor Closet C Sink Porcelain White Intact 23.00 1
4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 ACM
Asbestos containing materials were found to be present in the vinyl floor tile and mastics on the bottom layers and under carpet first and second floors, in the vibration dampers of the ducting in the fan room, and in the texture coating of Room 13.
The asbestos containing materials found in the buildings inspected were in good condition.
Listed below are a summary of regulations that apply if the asbestos containing materials are removed.
It is not meant to be conclusive. The contractor is responsible for ensuring that they are in compliance with all local, state and federal requirements regarding asbestos containing materials:
1. A property owner has the responsibility for ensuring that occupants are informed and that asbestos containing material is maintained in good condition. Custodial or maintenance staff must be trained regarding proper handling of the material as part of an ongoing operations and maintenance operation. CalOSHA 8 CCR 1529, California Health and Safety Code Section 25915, and Proposition 65.
2. If more than 100 square feet of materials that contain greater than 0.1% asbestos will be removed, the materials must be removed by a registered asbestos abatement contractor and transferred to a waste facility that will accept asbestos waste. CalOSHA 8 CCR 1529.
3. ACM that is classified by OSHA as other/miscellaneous materials are present. Removal of these materials is considered a Class II activity according to CalOSHA regulations. Work practices and engineering controls for Class II work are specified in CalOSHA 8 CCR 1529.
4. Notifications and abatement practices must follow the Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District Rule 424. These work practices have been designed to effectively reduce airborne asbestos to safe levels. Additionally, demolition activities would be subject to Rule 306, Asbestos NESHAP Fees.
4.2 LBP and Lead Containing Components
Doors, door frames, ceramic wall tile and utility sinks were found to contain lead.
Lead-safe work practices (such as using plastic tarps to catch paint chips and debris) are required regardless of the size of the project or the amount of lead present. The damaged paint should be NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 8 cleaned from the substrate and this waste tested as described below: Title 17, CA Code of Regulations, Section 36050.
Handling/Disposal
A composite sample should be analyzed for Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC) by USEPA reference method SW846. If the concentration of lead is greater than 1000 mg/kg the sample must be disposed of by a landfill which can handle such wastes. If the concentration is less than 50 mg/kg the sample may be disposed of as construction debris, if it is to remain in California. If the result falls between 50 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg, the sample must be further analyzed by the Waste Extraction Test (WET) for Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC) as described in 22 CCR 66261.24a. If this concentration exceeds 5 mg/liter the sample must be handled and disposed of as hazardous waste.
Outside of California
All lead-containing paint which may be disposed of outside the State of California must be tested for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) regardless of whether it is essentially intact. The sample may be a composite of the paint and the substrate if the paint is intact. Any material with results exceeding 5 mg/l must be treated as hazardous waste.
Hazard communication training and exposure assessments are required for employees who may be exposed to lead. 8 CCR 1532.1
Worker Protection
California regulations (8 CCR 1532.1) define lead-related construction work as, “Construction, alteration, painting, demolition, salvage, renovation, repair, or maintenance of any residential, public or commercial building, including preparation and clean-up, that, by using or disturbing lead containing material or soil, may result in significant exposure of individuals to lead”. As such, Cal/OSHA does not distinguish between LBP and paint, which contains lead at a lower concentration. The presence of lead at any level requires that exposure assessments be conducted and the provisions of 8 CCR 1532.1 be followed, including but not limited to training, notification, medical evaluations, and personal protective equipment. Objective data confirming that materials or surface coatings containing less than 0.06% (600 ppm) of lead may be used to demonstrate that employee exposure will not exceed the AL (action level), as long as every unique surface or material has been sampled or analyzed.
California Department of Public Health (CDPH)
To satisfy the California regulation requirement (Title 17, CCR, Division 1, Chapter 8) of notifying CDPH when a lead hazard evaluation survey was conducted, CDPH Form 8552, Lead Hazard Evaluation Report was submitted. A copy of the completed form is attached NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 9
4.3 Other Hazardous Waste including Universal Waste and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Universal waste is a subset of hazardous waste and contains mercury, lead, cadmium, copper and other substances hazardous to human and environmental health. In 1995, U.S. EPA developed an alternate, streamlined management program to encourage the collection and recycling of these commonly generated hazardous wastes. The federal universal waste regulations can be found in 40 CFR Part 273 and the California Regulations can be found in 22 CCR Division 4.5, Chapter 23.
Examples of Universal Waste include:
• Spent, hazardous waste batteries other than lead-acid batteries • Suspended or canceled hazardous waste pesticides that are subject to a recall or are part of a waste pesticide collection program
• Spent electric lamps (tubes or bulbs) that are hazardous due to heavy metals • Lighted exit signs
• Battery operated emergency lighting
Light Ballasts
Prior to renovation/demolition activities that may impact any light fixture ballast or transformer, it should be determined if the ballast/transformer contains PCBs and should be segregated and packaged for proper disposal in accordance with all federal, state, and local regulations and guidelines.
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). PCBs are colorless to light yellow, viscous liquids (above 50oF) that can be detected by their mild hydrocarbon odor. PCBs are non-flammable but are strong oxidants.
The routes of exposure for PCBs are inhalation, ingestion, and skin and eye contact leading to absorption. PCBs exposure is known to target the skin, eyes and liver. The primary effect of exposure to PCBs is a type of dermatitis known as chloracne associated with skin contact. The current PELs for PCBs are 0.5 mg/m3 and 1.0 mg/m3 for 54% chlorine and 42% chlorine substitution, respectively.
These compounds are suspected carcinogens based on animal studies.
PCBs have been used as coolants and lubricants in transformers, capacitors, and other electrical equipment because they don't burn easily and are good insulators. The manufacture of PCBs was stopped in the U.S. in 1977 because of evidence they build up in the environment and can cause harmful health effects. Products made before 1977 that may contain PCBs include old fluorescent lighting fixtures and electrical devices containing PCB capacitors, and old microscope and hydraulic oils.
Since 1979, PCB-free light ballasts are required to have the statement “no PCBs”. Five light fixtures were examined. All of the ballasts were labeled “No PCBs”.
Any ballast which is not labeled “no PCBs” should be treated as PCB containing.
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 10 Fluorescent Light Tubes
Fluorescent light tubes were observed in all buildings. All lighting tubes should be assumed to contain mercury.
Prior to renovation/demolition activities that may impact any light fixture ballast or transformer, it should be determined if the ballast/transformer contains PCBs and should be segregated and packaged for proper disposal in accordance with all federal, state, and local regulations and guidelines.
All fluorescent light tubes from this project shall be handled in accordance with all federal, state, and local regulations and guidelines including 40 CFR Part 261, CCR Title 22 Sections 66261 and 66699.
These light tubes typically contain concentrations of mercury exceeding the established Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC) and/or the Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC) values.
Observed Universal Waste Table
Universal Waste Total
4ft One Bulb Florescent Light Fixture w/1 ballast 30
4ft Two Bulb Florescent Light Fixture w/1 ballast 4
4ft Three Bulb Florescent Light Fixture w/1 ballast 76
4ft Four Bulb Florescent Light Fixture w/ 2 ballasts 11 2ft two Bulb (horseshoe) Florescent Light Fixture w/1 ballast 62 Compact Florescent Bulb (CFL) 6
Exit Signs 17
Battery Operated Emergency Light 14
Freon/HVAC Units 1 (Comp Room)
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 11
5.0 PHOTOGRAPHS
Asbestos Containing Materials
Vibration Damper
Vinyl Floor Tile (Under Carpet, 1ST Floor)
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 12 Vinyl Floor Tile (Under Carpet, 2nd Floor)
Rm 13 Texture Coating
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 13 Lead Containing Components
Doors and Door Frames
Door, Door Frame and Window Frame
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 14 Ceramic Wall Tile
Janitor Sink
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 15 Universal Waste
Exit Signs and Emergency Light
Light Fixtures
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 16 Light Fixtures
Light Ballast (NO PCB’S)
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 17 Comp Room A/C
Mercury Switch Thermostat
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 18
6.0 SAMPLE LOCATION DIAGRAMS
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 19 NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 20 SEPTEMBER 2004
LOWER LEVEL
526-24
526-34,35,36
526-49
UtrCmt
526-14
13 (EXIT) .
. 526-09
12 526-25 526-48
526-50
&
526-17 l EXIT
Upatan
526-16
449,150,
r \
526-03
(EXIT) (Lobby)
t$> - AED (Automated External Defibnllatof)
•- Fire Extinguisher •Fire Alarm Pull Box
Pacific Fisheries Environmental laboratory
^
^-*|526-XX |= Asbestos Containing Sample Location
Positive Lead Sample Location
-Exit Sign Location
JS -
&
.*0: =Emergency Light Location
/'
=Mercury Thermostat Location
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 21 SEPTEMBER 2004
UPPER LEVEL
526-19,20,21
526-18
526-07
526-13
526-30
526-53
526-08
Coriewe Roorr
25 526-01
526-04,05,06
526-02
526-51
•- Fire Extinguisher it - Fire Alarm PullBox
— Drywall Walls
Pacific Fisheries EnvironmentalLaboratory
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 22 526-38
Main Roof 526-39
526-42,43,44 526-41
526 BBQ Pit
i
-45,46,47
526-12
Library
526-40
^
^
^
526-XX |= Asbestos Containing Sample Location
JS) *
Positive Lead Sample Location
=Exil Sign Location
=Emergency Light Location
=Mercury Thermostat Location
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 23 SEPTEMBER 2004
LOWER LEVEL
\
*X f UPSTAIRS Ttf'o*
l EXIT.#'
Boiler Room
05 CW
T
Main Circuit
Breaker Panel
08 Southeast
? EXIT
Upstairs
9c
up
IX
(EXIT) (Lobby)
c
^
tj- AED (Automated External Defibrillator)
•- Fire Extinguisher - Fire Alarm Pull Box
Pacific FisheriesEnvironmental Laboratory
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 24 SEPTEMBER 2004
UPPER LEVEL
(HD
'n*
1 !7
3LM4=r
« n t
26 26a
24a 24b
28 -
7x: i
* o:
tN |X
*
• A I
Fan
23a
Room 1
1 u
S'
.
jT 23
Conference Room
25 Ej t o )
\
T7 m
22 Men
no
fef F¥T
JC 21
•05 >y\
tT\
“VJTU'.ii
'x:
up •
- *
Women
OO
fe OL
LMT — \
* 20
Direcfcx s
Office
20a
Vo"
:
29 29a MR i
"
T 3E3T
1 •- Fire Extinguisher - Fire Alarm Pull Box
Pacific FisheriesEnvironmental Laboratory
7.0 COMPLETE ASBESTOS SAMPLING DATA TABLE
Sample # Material Material Locations Sample Location Cond. DP Amount Result 526-01
1x1 White Ceiling Tile/Mastic
Library, 2nd Floor Hall, Conf.
Room, Rms 20-22, Rms 9A-9C,
Rm 10, S/E Entry Upper Level
Rm 22 Good Low
3,500 SF
None Detected
526-02 2nd Flr Hall Good Low None Detected
526-03 Rm 9B Good Low None Detected
526-04
1x1 Tan Ceiling Tile Conference Room S/W Entry
Entry Good Low
50 SF
None Detected
526-05 Entry Good Low None Detected
526-06 Entry Good Low None Detected
526-07
2x4 Ceiling Tile
Rooms: 26, 26A, 27, 28, 24A,
24B, 23A,7 , 8, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 17, North Ext, 1st Floor Hall
Rm 28 Good Low
4,500 SF
None Detected
526-08 Conf. Room Good Low None Detected
526-09 Rm 13 Good Low None Detected
526-10
Plaster Throughout 2nd Floor
Conf. Room Good Low
Throughout
None Detected
526-11 Rm 26 Good Low None Detected
526-12 Library Good Low None Detected
526-13
Drywall/Joint Compound Throughout 1st Floor
Rm 24B Good Low Throughout None Detected
526-14 Rm 13 Good Low 800 SF Texture 2% Chrysotile
526-15 Rm 14 Good Low Throughout None Detected
526-16
Stair Tread (Blue) Lobby, S/W Stairs, S/E Stairs,
North Stairs, Room 9A
Rm 9B Good Low
1,200 SF
None Detected
526-17 S/W Stairs Good Low None Detected
526-18 N/W Stairs Good Low None Detected
526-19
Vinyl Sheet Floor 2nd Floor Janitors Closet
Janitors Good Low
40 SF
None Detected
526-20 Janitors Good Low None Detected
526-21 Janitors Good Low None Detected
526-22
12x12 Off White VFT/Mastic Break Room, Room 16B,
Rooms 11 & 11A
Break Room Good Low
1,050 SF
None Detected
526-23 Break Room Good Low None Detected
526-24 Rm 16B Good Low None Detected
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 25 Sample # Material Material Locations Sample Location Cond. DP Amount Result 526-25 Black Baseboard/Mastic Throughout Rm 13 Good Low Throughout None Detected 526-26 Brown Baseboard/Mastic Break Room Break Room Good Low 22 LF None Detected 526-27
Roof Core Roof
Roof Good Low
5.400 SF
None Detected
526-28 Roof Good Low None Detected
526-29 Roof Good Low None Detected
526-30 Canvas Duct Connector Fanroom HVAC Seam Good Low 8 LF 40 % Chrysotile 526-31
1x1 Straight Hole Ceiling
Tile/Mastic
Above 2x4 Ceiling Tile @
Rooms 26A, 26, 28
Rm 28 Good Low
1,600 SF
None Detected
526-32 Rm 28 Good Low None Detected
526-33 Rm 28 Good Low None Detected
526-34
12x12 White VFT/Mastic Trailer
Trailer Good Low
400 SF
None Detected
526-35 Trailer Good Low None Detected
526-36 Trailer Good Low None Detected
526-37 2x4 Ceiling Tile Trailer Trailer Poor Low 400 SF None Detected 526-38
Exterior Stucco Exterior Walls
N/E Good Low
4,000 SF
None Detected
526-39 East Good Low None Detected
526-40 S/E Good Low None Detected
526-41 Fire Door Core Library Door Library Door Good Low 1 EA None Detected 526-42
Roof Shingle/Felt Paper Bike Storage Roof
Roof Good Low
150 SF
None Detected
526-43 Roof Good Low None Detected
526-44 Roof Good Low None Detected
526-45
Roof Shingle/Felt Paper BBQ Grill Roof
Roof Good Low
60 SF
None Detected
526-46 Roof Good Low None Detected
526-47 Roof Good Low None Detected
526-48
9x9 White VFT/Mastic
Under Carpet @ 1st Floor
Hallways, Rooms 2, 3, 12, 13,
14, 15, 17, 18
Hall 2 Good Low
3,550 SF
White VFT 2%
Chrysotile
Black Mastic 2 %
Chrysotile
526-49 Hall 3 Good Low
526-50 Rm 12 Good Low
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 26 Sample # Material Material Locations Sample Location Cond. DP Amount Result 526-51
9x9 Black VFT/Mastic
Under Carpet @ Conference
Room Top Level, 2nd Floor
Hallways, Rooms 20, 21, 22,
23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29
Rm 29A Good Low
526-52 Rm 20 Good Low 4,000 SF Black VFT 5% Chrysotile
526-53
Conf. Rm Top
Lvl. Good Low
526-54
12x12 White VFT/Mastic Conference Room @ Lower
Area
Conf. Rm Lower Good Low
700 SF
White VFT 5%
Chrysotile
Black Mastic 3%
Chrysotile
526-55 Conf. Rm Lower Good Low
526-56 Conf. Rm Lower Good Low
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 27
8.0 COMPLETE XRFAND PAINT CHIP SAMPLING DATA TABLES
XRF Table
Test
# Floor Room Side Component Substrate Color Cond. Pb Rep 1 Exterior Exterior A Wall Stucco Blue Intact 0.01
2 Exterior Exterior A Wall Stucco Green Intact 0.00
3 Exterior Exterior B Wall Stucco Blue Intact 0.00
4 Exterior Exterior B Down Spout Metal Blue Intact 0.00 5 Exterior Exterior B Window Frame Metal Blue Intact 0.00 6 Exterior Exterior B Double Door
Frame Metal Blue Fair 0.00
7 Exterior Exterior B Wall Stucco Blue Intact 0.00
8 Exterior Exterior C Wall Stucco Green Intact 0.00
9 Exterior Exterior C Double Door Metal Green Intact 0.00 10 Exterior Exterior C Double Door
Frame Metal Green Fair 0.00
11 Exterior Exterior C Handrail Metal Green Intact 0.00 12 Exterior Exterior C Handrail Wood Blue Intact 0.00
13 Exterior Exterior C Wall Stucco Blue Intact 0.00
14 Exterior Exterior D Down Spout Metal Blue Intact 0.00 15 Exterior Exterior D Door Metal Blue Intact 0.00
16 Exterior Exterior D Door Frame Metal Blue Intact 0.00 17 Exterior Exterior D Handrail Metal White Intact 0.00 18 Exterior Exterior D Deck Wood Grey Poor 0.00
19 Exterior Exterior D Picnic Table Wood Blue Poor 0.00 20 Exterior Exterior D BBQ Awning Wood Green Fair 0.00
21 Exterior Exterior D Picnic Awning Wood Green Fair 0.00 22 Exterior Exterior D Picnic Deck Wood Green Intact 0.00 23 Exterior Exterior A Garden Wall Concrete White Intact 0.00 24 Exterior Exterior A Fence Wood White Intact 0.00
25 Trailer Exterior A Wall Wood Blue Intact 0.00
26 Trailer Exterior B Wall Wood Blue Intact 0.00
27 Trailer Exterior C Wall Wood Blue Intact 0.00
28 Trailer Exterior D Wall Wood Blue Intact 0.00
29 Trailer Exterior D Door Metal Blue Intact 0.22
30 Trailer Exterior D Door Frame Metal Blue Intact 0.08 31 Roof Exterior D Mural Stucco Multi Intact 0.03
32 Roof Exterior B Vent/Ducking Metal Blue Intact 0.00
33 1 Rm 5 (Boiler Rm) A Double Door Metal Grey Intact 0.00 34 1 Rm 5 (Boiler Rm) A Double Door
Frame Metal Grey Intact 0.04
35 1 Rm 5 (Boiler Rm) B Wall Concrete Beige Fair 0.04
36 1 Rm 5 (Boiler Rm) C Wall Concrete Beige Fair 0.02
37 1 Rm 5 (Boiler Rm) D Wall Concrete Beige Fair 0.03
38 1 Rm 5 (Boiler Rm) B Ceiling Concrete Beige Poor 0.10 39 1 Rm 5 (Boiler Rm) C Electric Panel Metal Grey Intact 0.15 40 1 Rm 5 (Boiler Rm) C Ducting Metal Beige Intact 0.04 NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 28 Test
# Floor Room Side Component Substrate Color Cond. Pb Rep 41 1 Rm 7 A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
42 1 Rm 7 B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
43 1 Rm 7 C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
44 1 Rm 7 D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
45 1 Rm 7 B Window Frame Wood White Intact 0.00
46 1 Rm 8 A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
47 1 Rm 8 B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.01
48 1 Rm 8 C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
49 1 Rm 8 D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
50 1 Rm 8 B Window Frame Wood White Intact 0.01
51 1 Hallway 1 A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
52 1 Hallway 1 B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.01
53 1 Hallway 1 C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
54 1 Hallway 1 D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
55 1 Hallway 1 B Door Wood White Intact 0.01
56 1 Hallway 1 B Door Frame Wood White Intact 0.01
57 1 Rm 9B A Wall Concrete White Intact 0.01
58 1 Rm 9B B Wall Concrete White Intact 0.02
59 1 Rm 9B C Wall Concrete White Intact 0.00
60 1 Rm 9B D Wall Concrete White Intact 0.00
61 1 Rm 9D A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.01
62 1 Rm 9D B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
63 1 Rm 9D C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
64 1 Rm 9D D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
65 1 Rm 9D D Door Frame Metal White Intact 0.01
66 1 Rm 9A C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.02
67 1 Rm 9A C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.03
68 1 Rm 9A B Wall Concrete White Intact 0.00
69 1 Rm 9A C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
70 1 Rm 10 A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
71 1 Rm 10 B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
72 1 RM 10 C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
73 1 RM 10 D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
74 1 RM 10 D Closet Shelves Wood White Intact 0.00
75 1 RM 10 D Cabinet Door Wood White Intact 0.00
76 1 RM 10 D Cabinet
Shelves Wood White Intact 0.00
77 1 Rm 11 A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
78 1 Rm 11 B Wall Concrete White Intact 0.00
79 1 Rm 11 C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
80 1 Rm 11 D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
81 1 Rm11A A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
82 1 Rm11A B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
83 1 Rm11A C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
84 1 Rm11A D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
85 1 Rm12 A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
86 1 Rm12 B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
87 1 Rm12 C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.01
88 1 Rm12 D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.02
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 29 Test
# Floor Room Side Component Substrate Color Cond. Pb Rep 89 1 Rm13 A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
90 1 Rm13 B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.01
91 1 Rm13 C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
92 1 Rm13 D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
93 1 Rm14 A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.01
94 1 Rm14 B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
95 1 Rm14 C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
96 1 Rm14 D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
97 1 Rm15 A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
98 1 Rm15 B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
99 1 Rm15 C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.02
100 1 Rm15 D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
101 1 Rm16 (BreakRm) A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
102 1 Rm16 (BreakRm) B Wall Concrete White Intact 0.00
103 1 Rm16 (BreakRm) C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
104 1 Rm16 (BreakRm) D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.01
105 1 Rm16 (BreakRm) A Double Door
Frame Metal Brown Intact 0.02
106 1 Rm16 (BreakRm) B Ceiling Concrete White Intact 0.01 107 1 Rm 16A A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.01
108 1 Rm 16A B Wall Concrete White Intact 0.00
109 1 Rm 16A C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
110 1 Rm 16A D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
111 1 Rm 16A B Pipes Metal White Intact 0.00
112 1 Rm 16A C Door Wood Beige Intact 0.00
113 1 Rm 16A C Door Frame Wood Beige Intact 0.00
114 1 Rm 16B A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.01
115 1 Rm 16B B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
116 1 Rm 16B C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
117 1 Rm 16B D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.01
118 1 Rm 16B D Column Concrete White Intact 0.00
119 1 Rm 16B A Soffit Drywall White Intact 0.00
120 1 Rm 17 A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
121 1 Rm 17 B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
122 1 Rm 17 C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
123 1 Rm 17 D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
124 1 Rm 17 B Window Frame Wood White Intact 0.00
125 1 Rm 18 A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
126 1 Rm 18 B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
127 1 Rm 18 C Wall Concrete White Intact 0.00
128 1 Rm 18 D Wall Concrete White Intact 0.00
129 1 Hallway 2 A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
130 1 Hallway 2 B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
131 1 Hallway 2 C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
132 1 Hallway 2 D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
133 1 Hallway 2 C Double Door
Frame Metal Beige Intact 0.00
134 1 Hallway 2 A Door Metal White Intact 0.00
135 1 Hallway 2 B Door Frame Metal Beige Intact 0.00
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 30 Test
# Floor Room Side Component Substrate Color Cond. Pb Rep 136 1 Hallway 3 B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
137 1 Hallway 3 C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
138 1 Hallway 3 D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
139 1 Hallway 3 D Door Frame Wood White Intact 0.02
140 1 North Stairwell A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
141 1 North Stairwell B Wall Concrete White Intact 0.00 142 1 North Stairwell C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
143 1 North Stairwell D Wall Concrete White Intact 0.00 144 1 North Stairwell B Door Frame Metal Beige Intact 12.70 1 145 1 South East
Stairwell A Wall Concrete White Intact 0.03
146 1 South East
Stairwell B Wall Concrete White Intact 0
147 1 South East
Stairwell C Wall Concrete White Intact 0.02
148 1 South East
Stairwell D Wall Concrete White Intact 0
149 1
South East
Stairwell Storage
Room
C Door Frame Metal White Intact 12.7 1
150 1
South East
Stairwell Storage
Room
C Door Metal White Intact 10.6 1
151 2 Rm 20A C Wall Plaster White Intact 0.06
152 2 Rm 20A D Wall Plaster White Intact 0.07
153 2 Rm 20A C Door Frame Metal White Intact 10.10 1
154 2 Rm 20 A Wall Plaster White Intact 0.22
155 2 Rm 20 B Wall Plaster White Intact 0.10
156 2 Rm 20 C Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
157 2 Rm 20 D Wall Plaster White Intact 0.25
158 2 Rm 20 B Door Frame Metal White Intact 10.70 1
159 2 Rm 20 B Door Metal White Intact 8.20 1
160 2 Rm 20 B Window Frame Metal White Intact 12.30 1
161 2 Rm 20 C Door Frame Metal White Intact 2.40 1
162 2 Rm 20 A Window Frame Wood White Intact 0.00
163 2 Rm 21 A Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
164 2 Rm 21 B Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
165 2 Rm 21 C Wall Plaster White Intact 0.02
166 2 Rm 21 D Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
167 2 Rm 21 D Window Frame Wood White Intact 0.00
168 2 Rm 21 B Door Frame Metal White Intact 4.90 1
169 2 Rm 21 B Door Wood Natural Intact 0.00
170 2 Rm 22 A Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
171 2 Rm 22 B Wall Plaster White Intact 0.01
172 2 Rm 22 C Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
173 2 Rm 22 D Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
174 2 Rm 22 D Window Frame Wood White Intact 0.00
175 2 Rm 22 B Door Frame Metal White Intact 3.20 1
176 2 Rm 23 A Wall Plaster White Intact 0.13
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 31 Test
# Floor Room Side Component Substrate Color Cond. Pb Rep 177 2 Rm 23 B Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
178 2 Rm 23 C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.02
179 2 Rm 23 D Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
180 2 Rm 23 C Door Frame Metal White Intact 0.20
181 2 Rm 23A A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
182 2 Rm 23A B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
183 2 Rm 23A C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.12
184 2 Rm 23A D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.12
185 2 Rm 23A B Door Frame Metal White Intact 0.00
186 2 Rm 24A A Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
187 2 Rm 24A B Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
188 2 Rm 24A C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.12
189 2 Rm 24A D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
190 2 Rm 24A A Door Frame Metal White Intact 0.00
191 2 Rm 24A C Wiondow
Frame Wood White Intact 0.00
192 2 Rm 24B A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
193 2 Rm 24B B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
194 2 Rm 24B C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.01
195 2 Rm 24B D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.12
196 2 Rm 24B A Door Frame Metal White Intact 0.00
197 2 Rm 24B D Wiondow
Frame Wood White Intact 0.00
198 2 Rm 25
(Conference) A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
199 2 Rm 25
(Conference) B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
200 2 Rm 25
(Conference) C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
201 2 Rm 25
(Conference) D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
202 2 Rm 25
(Conference) D Door Frame Metal White Intact 7.40 4
203 2 Rm 26A A Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
204 2 Rm 26A B Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
205 2 Rm 26A C Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
206 2 Rm 26A D Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
207 2 Rm 26A B Door Frame Metal White Intact 7.20 2
208 2 Rm 26 A Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
209 2 Rm 26 B Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
210 2 Rm 26 C Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
211 2 Rm 26 D Wall Drywall White Intact 0.00
212 2 Rm 26 D Door Frame Metal Brown Intact 0.03
213 2 Rm 26 C Window Frame Wood White Intact 0.00
214 2 Rm 27 A Wall Plaster White Intact 0.03
215 2 Rm 27 B Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
216 2 Rm 27 C Wall Plaster White Intact 0.01
217 2 Rm 27 D Wall Plaster White Intact 0.03
218 2 Rm 27 A Door Frame Metal White Intact 0.00
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 32 Test
# Floor Room Side Component Substrate Color Cond. Pb Rep 219 2 Rm 27 C Window Frame Wood White Intact 0.00
220 2 Rm 28 A Wall Drywall Blue Intact 0.00
221 2 Rm 28 B Wall Drywall Blue Intact 0.00
222 2 Rm 28 C Wall Drywall Blue Intact 0.00
223 2 Rm 28 D Wall Drywall Blue Intact 0.01
224 2 Rm 28 D Door Frame Metal White Intact 0.00
225 2 Rm 28 B Window Frame Wood White Intact 0.00
226 2 Rm 29 A Wall Drywall Blue Intact 0.00
227 2 Rm 29 B Wall Drywall Blue Intact 0.00
228 2 Rm 29 C Wall Drywall Blue Intact 0.03
229 2 Rm 29 D Wall Drywall Blue Intact 0.00
230 2 Rm 29 C Door Frame Metal White Intact 13.70
231 2 Rm 29 A Window Frame Wood White Intact 0.00 1
232 2 Rm 29A A Wall Plaster Blue Intact 0.04
233 2 Rm 29A B Wall Plaster Blue Intact 0.00
234 2 Rm 29A C Wall Plaster Blue Intact 0.01
235 2 Rm 29A D Wall Plaster Blue Intact 0.03
236 2 Rm 29A C Door Frame Metal White Intact 0.00
237 2 Rm 29A A Window Frame Wood White Intact 0.00
238 2 Men's Restroom A Wall Plaster Beige Intact 0.12
239 2 Men's Restroom B Wall Plaster Beige Intact 0.14
240 2 Men's Restroom C Wall Plaster Beige Intact 0.10
241 2 Men's Restroom D Wall Plaster Beige Intact 0.09
242 2 Men's Restroom A Wall Tile
(Toilet Area) Ceramic Tile DarkPink Intact 14.50 300SF
243 2 Men's Restroom C Wall Tile
(Shower Area) Ceramic Tile LightPink Intact 0.05
244 2 Men's Restroom A Sink Porcelain White Intact 0.01 245 2 Men's Restroom D Toilet Porcelain White Intact 0.12 246 2 Men's Restroom B Urinal Porcelain White Intact 0.01 247 2 Men's Restroom D Stall Metal Beige Intact 0.01
248 2 Women's
Restroom A Wall Plaster Beige Intact 0.01
249 2 Women's
Restroom B Wall Plaster Beige Intact 0.17
250 2 Women's
Restroom C Wall Plaster Beige Intact 0.12
251 2 Women's
Restroom D Wall Plaster Beige Intact 0.08
252 2 Women's
Restroom B
Wall Tile
(Shower/Sink
Area)
Ceramic Tile Dark
Pink Intact 9.50 400SF
253 2 Women's
Restroom A Wall Tile Ceramic Tile LightPink Intact 0.03 254 2 Women's
Restroom A Toilet Porcelain White Intact 0.01
255 2 Women's
Restroom A Sink Porcelain White Intact 0.07
256 2 Women's
Restroom D Door Frame Metal Beige Intact 0.00
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 33 Test
# Floor Room Side Component Substrate Color Cond. Pb Rep 257 2 Fan Room D Door Frame Metal Beige Intact 9.40 1
258 2 Hallway 4 A Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
259 2 Hallway 4 C Wall Plaster White Intact 0.04
260 2 Hallway 5 B Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
261 2 Hallway 5 D Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
262 2 Hallway 6 A Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
263 2 Hallway 6 C Wall Plaster White Intact 0.03
264 2 Hallway 7 B Wall Plaster White Intact 0.05
265 2 Hallway 7 D Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
266 2 North Lobby A Wall Plaster White Intact 0.01
267 2 North Lobby B Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
268 2 North Lobby C Wall Plaster White Intact 0.02
269 2 North Lobby D Wall Plaster White Intact 0.03
270 2 North Lobby A Door Frame Metal White Intact 0.00
271 2 Janitor Closet A Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
272 2 Janitor Closet B Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
273 2 Janitor Closet C Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
274 2 Janitor Closet D Wall Plaster White Intact 0.00
275 2 Janitor Closet C Sink Porcelain White Intact 23.00 1 276 2 Janitor Closet D Door Frame Metal Beige Intact 0.00 277 3 Library A Wall Plaster White Intact 0.05
278 3 Library B Wall Plaster White Intact 0.03
279 3 Library C Wall Plaster White Intact 0.03
280 3 Library D Wall Plaster White Intact 0.04
281 3 Library B Window Frame Wood Beige Intact 0.00
282 3 Library D Door Frame Metal Beige Intact 0.00
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 34
9.0 LABORATORY REPORTS AND CHAINS OF CUSTODY (COCS)
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 35 I
tfl I r,
n s I
“O T J
a
t r t T z
B Sr ra
its £
>
S e n § =
*
c o
-
& T T
= "O n g SL I
x Q
t i l
g 1 1'
s
'
= r n
s </i
i. . a
N s
£ £ 5 i i
i 1 I I 1 I a u
CL IT>
u•
g I
]
I t
l re 1 3
|
O n
Q 0 G & ft F 5
n S
a. 0
& 4
F j t 0
- £» t
> 3
i 03 Q
-
s g
M S c
:t
c
3 *
(
ft
ID *
-0 3
*
ci o
^
8 a
X 3
*
0 o
h =
C O
3 H
-
4 o
*
< {& TJ u 3
t/
*
7 9
3 0
o CL H D
I g o X
O c O
0 VT
a
jMft EA
c i z 3
z -E? s <r— m o o>
TK <r~ n
vf §
I
-P 8 s
r H - *
fi Hi g r* X _3,
1 z
i
n
s: R
nt
f
> s o o
ft X
<
_ 3
S 33 I Q X
n s
i
o Cft
B CD
E Mpa =:
=iia
I J
r- 5
CD \ ^
t/1 \ t
a 5
>
r a 3
1 B.
3 CD
SS|
>
Ji m
-
5 iisr ® 3
2 ^
£U
ft ”
i
8 a-
“ »
C3 TUJ
s o
rn o C\ I <
§
o m r* § z
0 u? rn I
z
if sS
*
ft
1 fp
CP £
O
I
h 9 & $ V<s CO > oof co ’ tog
Sil'
g-i
i- S-rt No H
r
a
z o
3 ft S o -n
3 g i
M;
o
t
L ?
& a 5 f t fis
*
03 3
i
ife. hip
F o a
8 3
£
3 £
“F
S
CJ ?3
S
5 s KF S
!£ in d
Dfl
D tA I
I? ^
55’ O
r-i s Cfl
3 <r
'i o D Oi z
O
i
i
S
’
£
Cfl 3
g
a.
g "
33 S
to s?
’ I z
1 &
*
S, s>
I £
a s
^
w
V
E
^
OJ r+ Lewi f
£ I l
CL >
05 S a
n.c =- tar
3)
i
K
m O
• O Pi I
jf 5
Si I f & I
CD
c
z IT s
s tr
_
s
VJS 3" d -ii
—IL S 3 2.
Ji 03 £
^ I ft
•“
0 ll
CL tt TTT 03 |& &i|
f
Hllll
3 O Q Q, nn
2. $ O (13
a 3 m
m 03 CL
£
Hf = u> r %
co 51 q r>
0 £
I
& > o
I S X ^
E
C»J
4 Ni a s s o
f
si
fl
"
I
D n nn D a
*
> *
a
o
m Funs- Spcre Trap AMtysis
&
E
W n n SpnraTrap AnHlysH -Ofliw panicfes
D n el
*
?= S- CD
taectMiflrcgpapIc Enam fQuatistivs^ T .
E3
& n n QuaaitilsHvaSpireCoimtDfraclEitam p
0 *
s. K n 1-MsdlaBurtaesFungi fGemts fD + Asp, s$pr )
n I-MedFa Surface Fungi (Genius ID +>|j
^
app.} Vs
- S ffff s tn
re C
D 3-MffiHa SurfaceFungi(GamsID+dsp. app.}
i. S o n
El Cuffumflla Air Fungi (Ggiua ID + Asp. SPIL)
ET
l!- ra
m
n Gram Stoln £ Counts (CulbjrabteAt & Surface Bacteria ) n n culture o
a
Q
n Totaf CoUfonn I
, £ tofifitescnccMbsence}
LM K o n ^
j
Membmne FiliraDnai (spader organism): o
0 n n MPN 0&
Bactaiia (apecily organfism): a LW
Q nnno QuanffTray Os -Sswags Screen
N
s D nn AsPestes Analysis -PCM Alrhome Fiber Count (NfOSH 7*1(10} '
Jl a
^
S.
3"
BBBeBBB Asbeslcs Analysis-PlM(EPAmatfio(lS00rR-S3"
fIE) D
°
4 Ni
+ =1
£ nn n PCR (spadfy test);
1 5,
e urr
m
&
ma
? f|
11-4
n Q
?JiS
Uf rr
ssn
T
J.
= n
Lih iH n
a
ain
n C= o g
& n z
3 S S
3 X A
n
ffl m 5
M
*
5 0
*
T1
§ n 3 c
[rt 1 1 3 s- > o l )
Q 3
P
I u
*
*
c
3 -
)
Q
_ I %
r
{3 % & mi 0 Ob H ix< & SIS $3 -i L/I "
:2i
3 Sf S
m S O
QJ n
sll s = g
2:
I
'
n '
= *
g
- Ii
O “
2 2
3 ft
£
H
1 a W P.t
I
!isf r3
S
'
m ©
I
H] >*
5> \i
3L t
"
Rl m PI S’ f'krw jl
^
te
=l «3
* " '
8$ t
21 fym,
’-
Viit
c
f a Z 5
F
^
T3
I
ij3
#rt i
0 3H#
z J4
I O
|l
i
&
Pijj 3
a
T
3 3
=: a
N!
?
£ a
1 0
> /N -<
I
g
OJ S 3 - 1
A i
i
s
& a. K & H i?
.:A
:d
s
»
a1
I. n?
i
i
§
3 B. o m A o>
£ S n
•: . j a
,;- r< «
o vs H nr - m
•
.- EP jr ?
* I
£
S -5|
a
* ^
“
2 ^
c m S
o
&
i
D "
3- n
g
5?
«s S-
;
p
o
TE o
tt
O
z
3 1
i P>
r. w O
v>
Ln o OJ z
« £ ta
0& n £* m
i, K
Ln
E :S c
1 0"
£ g OJ i
a
% BS *ui
u
u
a S
IZ 5 "0
'
P,
i
I
rt
,®
-
j
I
s s W
V
3 O & 5 n m a -
nj C •
? 1
5 !t
tn <s m 5
s m&
. am fr
7 S3 © a
Is? cr
D
^
M 5-
£ 3: c:
f
[ i N 5 o
ft
- 3
s
itfSl 3
S sSU i
:1
pi
s:e £ F7 n'
^
s
S?> n
_
^ !
I
O H
m
ia m %
g 31
i et r.-i
m
i
Oi'.’.‘ I
m Q
g m
Fungi
- Spnrfl Tr ?1p Artflly^
n ri §
EJ C
**
i
pT m Spare irap Anal}?is - Other particles
* £
3 ~g 1 Direct Ps^
i
^mScn-pii?: Br.'nti (
*
{
^
cr-nli^
l-ivi*!
^ ^
S'
E i f*
rr a- r
*
g
3 "3 u Quanti«itiv*
SpMt Coum Direct Ejtkm
1 3
t-Merfia Surfarr Fungi{GrfiuF ir> * Asp. spp,}
? 1. £ £
* C1
ZfcMcdia Swfatr Fungi (Omuj!IFi + Asp. .Ppp.)
I 3 m 3-McHia SurfnCn Fungi (Cinnus ID
*
Aip. spp.) -i a
5 a
*'
-- .i Culturable Air Funjjj (GenuiID + Asp. sop.)
s’
Cram Siain and Counts (CLiliurable Air and Surface Dacreria) • i
'
tigTnrTnWfl giFlturc
i
z-Toral CpIcForm, .ati (Prcjcnta/Abicntr'
)
& MMI
s WcFnbrane Filcritian (Please sptdfyar^
aniim)
7 < ib MPU BaccerFa (Pfcase specify organism)
i
QuantiTray Srwagfl Scn^
n
Mi I
:v AibEaWS Analysis -1
?C?
^
AerLrOreit Fibtr CosiriT (NlOSH ?4<I0)
'
1 > X:
Asbestos Ar-aly^
is PLM (EPA mcchoH eot>/
RTp3-nft)
rn X, J
I PCR (please spedly test) M I
L
i
^
CHAIN OF CUSTODY EMLab P&K
www.EMLabPK.com
F-njf Ralrt Sriw Wind Ocsr
None
Lf*hi N
^
n’
Cyllurp-bk
001370636 Ch*
ny Hill, HI: 1936 ornty Avenue, Cherry HHF,NJ OB003 * (BBS) 871-19S4 Phoenix,A2: 1501 Weal Knudsen Drive, Plioeniir, AZ 35027 * (800) 6S1-4802 San Bruno, CA;1150 Bayliill Drive, 4100,5an Bruno, CA 9406S * (B 66) Bfl6-fi6S3 ModerajE Tape.
iwib
Spare Bi&CziMCT
Water, Bulk
Heavy Trap
Bulk
T
5? &
r-
^
§
I
ID a>
4 J 8
5CTi A & nt 5
n »3 S
'
u:
S' S' & d. g
E? C £
*
| £ o u
<
v
E LT
- 5 * ,y £ ? E
j &c. S t; e a a c
< a c S
' E
CL. 5
m Cl &
2or
-e o i
c
a
c
2 C
1 £ S t .S
*
u
JL~. ? u_ u a. S £
0 & tr 3e
_ g U 3
I
-n
6 V
< 1
s
So CL
I
* £ £
Olj 3 E ifr i
|
^
ft.
l
Vi
S. D
£
u ki ,5?
1- s a 5 L£ E: S. S-
‘
u
C £ 1 s-
£ ig 4 i
rd a 'E c
'
rd £
< r: L E I a
s CL LH ,s i
£
*
J <
id
5 -
E s 5
B *
4 5 £
^
6 !? £ t
1I 5
’
_. c 3 £ .o
4.1 5 s E s
LT, '
t
1 £
|
E I g
CL
S m 2 o
•rc
VI
. Jj E -s £ ft C rt £ -1
v a
TZfe Z3 /Zif/2 tvtSiTE \{
Frf
***
&< 3
T
K.
- Z3
0f£
*
i
**
4 $<3 rfv/
^
B
^
/rC
'25
- Z6
jgooF
- za /
—
/
" jo pucT
/'X
-
/' S-frtt
'^
hf holt, c&c t7t
^
/
ti&iC
~
3 (
r?3 v t
A
D - 8C BioCasserre ST - Spore i
T-Tape .Duse rap: Zjefon,
Allergcnco,Burisnd...
:
/2 ?//5
~-
2- £»
A1S - Andcraen SW - Swab SO - Soil
SAS - Surface Air Sampler P - Potable tosier B - Bulk
MP - Non-Focable Wal
^ CP r O - Ocher - Contact Place
ByEubmittingthb'
ChainqfCuscoei/. ycluiBreetobeboundbydie terms and«mdtcionSi=LfcinhsEnvw.eraIabpk.com/ ierms.fiiin1
Copyright © 2002-2009 EMLab P&K
Oric. « 2[i(H7ie IWr, 24 tlc.i!cd:lir29/ns njplori,Q.
"
n
3 5
IIII in r- L JJ S' a S
? ? ? 3 D £ i * x •s -s
§ IS
1 n
I
M
2 9
z
)
1 \
I
t
I
i f
\
3 s
-
I
£
5 ^
;
I
(
oo
^.
M
S
'
t
n
ga
*
1 *
o
-
ft tti
b
&
-
'
wLbt IJH J 2
5 S
5 da ft
0^
m
n
—
s
H
-g
ol
0 cr *0?!
T1 l"l A ° n 3 C
M
a
>
-o
>
x
3 S
'
130 Pa
&
*
<
s
!
-
pp Ir =1 «
fn
a
r\
‘Tt
r\
l
3 0
0 n
£
g 141
o
«(n
Q
T- i % ±
72 t
S. *
2-—
„8 Rg
*
O
m
>>
0 r*
<
5 cz
/
5i
&
rr3
J
*
*
S
.
,
>
i
GgS s « *? ^ » * m i“ » o »3 "3 * a o\- ^
trt
\
0 0
-
0 r
m
I
>i 3
~R
9 Pa
2 *
£T
1 ^Ti
i-rn r*
2 >
*
E
O
H
a
D
n LTi
Pu Cfl
k '
sD
H
g
(A
£
S
*
|
?
&
I. *
e
>
'
Wli
*
?
cnu.
TO
a
l
-
3' u
>
X
Ri-n
£
e£-
?
&
5 n
92' ^*
S
i. ^
f
"
§
61 CL fi«
p
"KJ cr sw:~ I [T. 3 8
53 |
.
ra
m
s
-
S
C
^
^
B
£
°
x
* s
x
cf
fS
o
?
rt- S
-
3S
;f ;;C-'
e
in '^
i
m
Ia
s
QI!
n
Fungf
- Spare Trap Anatysis
f
r
-
Z
> 5
3m
||
=
_ SpPiTTr
^
p Anafyiix
- Ocher panicfes
«
X
]r Direci Micrascnpie Exam
(Qualitative
)
s era
a
3 si Ouanticotive Spore Count Direct bam
' rr-o-s
1 -
M
«di
i. Suefkci Fungi
(
C
^
P rtus- ID
+ Asp
. spp
.
)
f
5 '
s
2 -
M
<dia SurfatfiFungi
(Genus- irr ID
+ Asp. spp
.
)
I
I
VTT.lr
P
1 3
-Media Surlace Funpi
(Genus ID
+
,As^
. spp.
)
pse l i r 3 P -
'
Gufturable riirFungi
(Genus ID
+
A^
ir, spp.
)
?
li
n.
Oram
5raIn anrf
t
.riiineF
(Curpirablc An- and Surfecc Dacreria
)
i Irji’n
.fieJ’i
'
u*
<
ullrm;
l
i
<
>J
—
1 <
1 Total Coliforsm
, EraiV
(Pnesenet
/Absence
)
—
^
1 -
O
ii Membrane FHera.cion
(Please specify arganiim
) Co
0 S MPN LM ftactdi?i(PlcaFC spcci'
fy
&
r^
m anism
)
V
.wK
Os
N
T)
i
m QuantiTray
-Sev-n
-ge Screen
Asbestna Analysis
- FCM Airborne Fiber Count
(NIQ5
H7
d00
'
s
|
,
m
>yAsbestns Analysis
- PLM
(EPA method fiD
0 /
R
-
?
3 -11
A
)
U
1 as FCR
(pleas
*
specify test
)
?
I
^
CHAIN OF CUSTODY EMLab P&K
WWW .EMLabPK.com
Ngn-Cglturablc 00137DS36
0»my Hfl
^
NJ:193 G OJncy Avenue, Cherry HNI,Nf 0&Q03 *
(E6G) £7T -1984
PlioeniK,AZ:1501 Wesltfnudsen Drive,PhQEnix,AZB5&27 * (BOO) <551-4302 Spn Brunoj CAz 1150 Bayhill Drive, #100,San Bruno,CA 940* 56 (866) 88S-66S3
Tape Spore
Trap
BiaCasscm
Water,
Swab
Bul.k
;.
Kir *E
1 s
i s
t
CcmiJia n>'
; L Address: & s
2; a o
ial Instfuttio 5 - m Contact:
£ 5.
d d d & s "0
n
g
-
Phone; S' Sr Sr E
u
Sr t
£ I
jj I
-
£
l
c o
C - •
s
•
s k£l
- £
aD
_L'
+
1 4- r
£ & .y
i
u
2fefeg
A(o
^
y l
- ^
c o -f e
'
c y
5ampiir
-g f
s £ £ I
t i?
Project 9 Sr ID: STD - Standard (DEFAULT) s_ £ I £
LLI
-
r
'
ifr 2 o £ £ £ | s 5
n
-?
s J_
l
J>- -E o a a
? ?
c
j5 ND - Next Business Day E
_ Project Desc.: aLL.
5 c
g 3 _ s rp O
J
5 Project
Zip Co
^
<j~.
u a. ?
£ £ <
¥
a
:<2 if if •C SO - Same Business Day Rush d &
Cl.
DATE &Time: Jr- LJ-
\Q
4 .a I?
i
s s s s S.
rri it
£ Jr c
I
i
-
E 8-
f
a?
I
rt
a Er Ei ii PO Number WH - Weekend/Ho[iday & 0 1
s
E
o Q.
Cl LH -S 1
£
.v Jj <
'J-\
s E £ § 8 1 m
5 P
II
E Q.
£ -D
I
3 in s e 5 4<
3 jij s E J!
I
Ct
K
3 ?
5 fil E a
5 £
i;
£ c o d, u 2 2 O' <
S2H> -f5 £**
>F sh< o?fE /
F&-+ £
- UC*
f x'
y ^
h
^
r . Vfr(t
*
8 «jhc & J
v'
? K
^
pbcjc VFT (
/
* lilZ jjgg
—f z
I zAl
[2
*
{t uX;
vFrf^
S-
- \
jy
6 - 5 5
£ - F
PiiiiiMilMilllil .!
’
f
BC - BioC-iSJttre”
*
ST SporeTrXip; ZefbOj T - Tape D - Oust
A
'
le^
gertccij Buriard... 2
2:
^
.#*
A1S - AndersEn SW - Stv&b SO - Soil
SAS * Surface Air Sampler P.Po«bleWim B -Bulk
0P NP - Nan-Potable Water
- Contact Plate O - Other
By submitting this Chain of Custody, you agree to be bound by the terms end conditions set forth atuv^w.emlabpk.com/'terTTis.htiiil Copyright 0 2002-I0DS EMlab P&K
r>i
;.
*
JtOl74 Rcrza lir;inrl;e
^
7Py09 Pi£< lDrt.(
JSU
S •F *5
Approved by:
Approved Signatory
Roshanak Kalantari
Report for:
Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms. Grace Rinck
Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
1132 Mission St
Suite B
South Pasadena, CA 91030
Regarding: Project: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
EML ID: 1370836
All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. The results relate only to the items tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data for sample results with >1% asbestos concentration can be provided when requested.
EMLab P&K ("the Company") shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.
Dates of Analysis:
Asbestos PLM: 05-28-2015 and 05-29-2015
Service SOPs: Asbestos PLM (EPA Methods 600/R-93/116 & 600/M4-82-020, SOP EM-AS-S-1267) EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 1 of 18
EMLab P&K
A TestAmerica Company
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Total Samples Submitted: 56
Total Samples Analyzed: 56
Total Samples with Layer Asbestos Content > 1%: 5
Location: 526-01, White 1'X1' ceil tile Lab ID-Version‡: 6292989-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Beige Ceiling Tile with White Surface ND
Dark Brown Mastic ND
Brown Fibrous Material ND
White Plaster ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 25% Cellulose
20% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-02, White 1'X1' ceil tile Lab ID-Version‡: 6292990-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Beige Ceiling Tile with White Surface ND
Dark Brown Mastic ND
Brown Fibrous Material ND
White Plaster ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
10% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-03, White 1'X1' ceil tile Lab ID-Version‡: 6292991-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Beige Ceiling Tile with White Surface ND
Dark Brown Mastic ND
Brown Fibrous Material ND
White Plaster ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 25% Cellulose
20% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 2 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-04, Tan 1'X1' ceil tile Lab ID-Version‡: 6292992-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Beige Ceiling Tile ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 80% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 3 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-05, Tan 1'X1' ceil tile Lab ID-Version‡: 6292993-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Beige Ceiling Tile ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 80% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-06, Tan 1'X1' ceil tile Lab ID-Version‡: 6292994-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Beige Ceiling Tile ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 80% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-07, 2'x4' Ceil tile Lab ID-Version‡: 6292995-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Beige Ceiling Tile with White Surface ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 45% Cellulose
45% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-08, 2'x4' Ceil tile Lab ID-Version‡: 6292996-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Beige Ceiling Tile with White Surface ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 45% Cellulose
45% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 4 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-09, 2'X4' Ceil tile Lab ID-Version‡: 6292997-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Beige Ceiling Tile with White Surface ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 45% Cellulose
45% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-10, Plaster Lab ID-Version‡: 6292998-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Plaster ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-11, Plaster Lab ID-Version‡: 6292999-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Gray Plaster ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-12, Plaster Lab ID-Version‡: 6293000-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Plaster ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 5 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-13, Drywall/J.C. Lab ID-Version‡: 6293001-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Joint Compound ND
White Tape ND
White Texture with Paint ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-14, Drywall/J.C. Lab ID-Version‡: 6293002-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Texture with Paint 2% Chrysotile
White Tape ND
White Joint Compound < 1% Chrysotile
White Drywall with Brown Paper ND
Composite Asbestos Fibrous Content: < 1% Asbestos
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Comments: Composite asbestos content provided is only for Drywall/Joint compound. Composite content provided does not follow the guidelines set forth by NVLAP. This analysis was performed by following the NESHAP guidelines.
Location: 526-15, Drywall/J.C. Lab ID-Version‡: 6293003-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Tape ND
White Joint Compound < 1% Chrysotile
White Drywall with Brown Paper ND
Composite Asbestos Fibrous Content: < 1% Asbestos
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Comments: White Texture with Paint layer was not analyzed due to prior positive series. Composite asbestos content provided is only for Drywall/Joint compound. Composite content provided does not follow the guidelines set forth by NVLAP.
This analysis was performed by following the NESHAP guidelines.
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 6 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-16, Blue stair tread Lab ID-Version‡: 6293004-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Yellow Mastic ND
Blue Flooring ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 7 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-17, Blue stair tread Lab ID-Version‡: 6293005-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Mastic ND
Blue Flooring ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-18, Blue stair tread Lab ID-Version‡: 6293006-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Mastic ND
Blue Flooring ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-19, Vinyl sheet flr. Lab ID-Version‡: 6293007-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Mastic ND
Gray Sheet Flooring with Fibrous Backing ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 10% Cellulose
10% Glass Fibers
10% Synthetic Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-20, Vinyl sheet flr. Lab ID-Version‡: 6293008-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Mastic ND
Gray Sheet Flooring with Fibrous Backing ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 10% Cellulose
10% Glass Fibers
10% Synthetic Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 8 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-21, Vinyl sheet flr. Lab ID-Version‡: 6293009-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Mastic ND
Gray Sheet Flooring with Fibrous Backing ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 10% Cellulose
10% Glass Fibers
10% Synthetic Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-22, 12'x12' Off white VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293010-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Mastic ND
White Floor Tile ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-23, 12'x12' Off white VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293011-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Mastic ND
Off-White Floor Tile ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-24, 12'x12' Off white VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293012-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Mastic ND
Off-White Floor Tile ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 9 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-25, Black baseboard/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293013-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Mastic ND
Black Baseboard ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-26, Brown baseboard/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293014-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Mastic ND
Dark Brown Baseboard ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-27, Roof core Lab ID-Version‡: 6293015-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Green Tape ND
Black/White Foam ND
Off-White Compound ND
White Non-Fibrous Material ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 2% Synthetic Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-28, Roof core Lab ID-Version‡: 6293016-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Off-White Compound ND
White Non-Fibrous Material ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 10 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-29, Roof core Lab ID-Version‡: 6293017-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Off-White Compound ND
White Non-Fibrous Material ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-30, Duct connector Lab ID-Version‡: 6293018-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Duct Insulation 40% Chrysotile
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 25% Cellulose
20% Synthetic Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-31, 1'x1' Straight hole ceil tile/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293019-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Plaster ND
Dark Brown Mastic ND
Brown Ceiling Tile with White Surface ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 75% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-32, 1'x1' Straight hole ceil tile/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293020-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Plaster ND
Dark Brown Mastic ND
Brown Ceiling Tile with White Surface ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 75% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 11 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-33, 1'x1' Straight hole ceil tile/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293021-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Plaster ND
Dark Brown Mastic ND
Brown Ceiling Tile with White Surface ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 75% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-34, 12x12 White VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293022-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Yellow Mastic ND
White Floor Tile ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-35, 12x12 White VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293023-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Yellow Mastic ND
Gray Floor Tile ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-36, 12x12 White VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293024-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Yellow Mastic ND
White Floor Tile ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 12 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-37, 2x4 Ceil. tile Lab ID-Version‡: 6293025-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Beige Ceiling Tile ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 55% Cellulose
35% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-38, Stucco Lab ID-Version‡: 6293026-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Gray Cementitious Material ND
Tan Stucco with Paint ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-39, Stucco Lab ID-Version‡: 6293027-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Gray Cementitious Material ND
Tan Stucco with Paint ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-40, Stucco Lab ID-Version‡: 6293028-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Gray Cementitious Material ND
Tan Stucco with Paint ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 13 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-41, Fire door core Lab ID-Version‡: 6293029-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Off-White Fireproofing ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 5% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-42, Roof shingle/felt Lab ID-Version‡: 6293030-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Felt ND
Black Roofing Shingle with Gray Pebbles ND
Black Roofing Shingle with Brown Pebbles ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
10% Glass Fibers
5% Synthetic Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-43, Roof shingle/felt Lab ID-Version‡: 6293031-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Felt ND
Black Roofing Shingle with Gray Pebbles ND
Black Roofing Shingle with Brown Pebbles ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
10% Glass Fibers
5% Synthetic Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-44, Roof shingle/felt Lab ID-Version‡: 6293032-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Felt ND
Black Roofing Shingle with Gray Pebbles ND
Black Roofing Shingle with Brown Pebbles ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
10% Glass Fibers
5% Synthetic Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 14 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-45, Roof shingle/felt Lab ID-Version‡: 6293033-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Felt ND
Black Roofing Shingle with Gray Pebbles ND
Black Roofing Shingle with Brown Pebbles ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
10% Glass Fibers
5% Synthetic Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-46, Roof shingle felt Lab ID-Version‡: 6293034-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Felt ND
Black Roofing Shingle with Gray Pebbles ND
Black Roofing Shingle with Brown Pebbles ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
10% Glass Fibers
5% Synthetic Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-47, Roof shingle felt Lab ID-Version‡: 6293035-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Felt ND
Black Roofing Shingle with Gray Pebbles ND
Black Roofing Shingle with Brown Pebbles ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
10% Glass Fibers
5% Synthetic Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 15 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-48, 9x9 White VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293036-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Mastic 2% Chrysotile
White Floor Tile 2% Chrysotile
Yellow Mastic ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 16 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-49, 9x9 White VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293037-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Yellow Mastic ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Comments: White Floor Tile and Black Mastic layers were not analyzed due to prior positive series.
Location: 526-50, 9x9 White VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293038-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Yellow Mastic ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Comments: White Floor Tile and Black Mastic layers were not analyzed due to prior positive series.
Location: 526-51, 9x9 Black VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293039-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Mastic ND
Black Floor Tile 5% Chrysotile
Yellow Mastic ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-52, 9x9 Black VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293040-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Mastic ND
Yellow Mastic ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Comments: Black Floor Tile layer was not analyzed due to prior positive series.
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 17 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
EMLab P&K
1010 N Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91202
(866) 465-6653 Fax (858) 569-5806 www.emlab.com
Client: Aurora Industrial Hygiene, Inc.
C/O: Mr. Matt Froehlich, Mr. Robert Rinck, Ms.
Grace Rinck
Re: 26180; NOAA- Monterey
Date of Sampling: 05-26-2015
Date of Receipt: 05-27-2015
Date of Report: 05-29-2015
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116 Location: 526-53, 9x9 Black VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293041-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Mastic ND
Yellow Mastic ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Comments: Black Floor Tile layer was not analyzed due to prior positive series.
Location: 526-54, 12x12 White VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293042-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Mastic 3% Chrysotile
White Floor Tile 5% Chrysotile
Yellow Mastic ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: 526-55, 12x12 White VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293043-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Yellow Mastic ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Comments: White Floor Tile and Black Mastic layers were not analyzed due to prior positive series.
Location: 526-56, 12x12 White VFT/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 6293044-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Yellow Mastic ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Comments: White Floor Tile and Black Mastic layers were not analyzed due to prior positive series.
EMLab P&K, LLC EMLab ID: 1370836, Page 18 of 18
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
10.0 CERTIFICATIONS
NOAA- 1352 Lighthouse Avenue 6/29/15
Asbestos, Lead, Hazardous Material Inspection Project #26180 Page 36
LEAD HAZARD EVALUATION REPORT
State of California—Health and Human Services Agency California Department of Public Health Section 1 — Date of Lead Hazard Evaluation _____________________ Section 3 — Structure Where Lead Hazard Evaluation Was Conducted Lead Inspection Risk assessment Clearance Inspection Other (specify) _____________________________ City County Zip Code
Construction date (year)
of structure
Type of structure
Multi-unit building School or daycare
Single family dwelling
Section 4 — Owner of Structure (if business/agency, list contact person) Address [number, street, apartment (if applicable)] City State Name Telephone number
Section 5 — Results of Lead Hazard Evaluation (check all that apply) No lead-based paint detected
No lead hazards detected
Intact lead-based paint detected
Lead-contaminated dust found
Section 6 — Individual Conducting Lead Hazard Evaluation Name
Name and CDPH certification number of any other individuals conducting sampling or testing (if applicable) CDPH certification number Signature Date
Section 7 — Attachments
A. A foundation diagram or sketch of the structure indicating the specifc locations of each lead hazard or presence of lead-based paint;
B. Each testing method, device, and sampling procedure used; C. All data collected, including quality control data, laboratory results, including laboratory name, address, and phone number.
First copy and attachments retained by inspector
Second copy and attachments retained by owner
Third copy only (no attachments) mailed or faxed to:
California Department of Public Health
Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch Reports
850 Marina Bay Parkway, Building P, Third Floor
Richmond, CA 94804-6403
Fax: (510) 620-5656
CDPH 8552 (6/07)
Zip Code
Address [number, street, apartment (if applicable)] City State Zip Code Telephone number
Section 2 — Type of Lead Hazard Evaluation (Check one box only) Address [number, street, apartment (if applicable)]
Other____________
No
Deteriorated lead-based paint detected
Lead-contaminated soil found Other____________________
Yes
Don’t Know
Children living in structure?
5/26/15 ✔
1352 Lighthouse Ave Pacific Grove Monterey 93950 Unknown ✔ Office Building ✔ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin 301 713 1208 1401 Constituition Ave, NW Room 518 Washington DC 20001 ✔ ✔ Ceramic Tile Matthew Froehlich 626 403 4104 1132 Mission St Suite B Pasadena Ca 91030 13643 6/29/15 n n
n
XRF Calibration Form
Address/Unit:
Device:
Date:
Inspector:
_ 1352 Lighthouse Avenue ________
XLP 300_______SEr# 91830____________________
_5/26/14______________________________________
_ _M.Froehlich___
Calibration Check Tolerance Used: 1.0 mg/cm2
Use Level III (1.02 mg/cm2) NISH SRM Paint Film
First Calibration Check Time: __0930________
1st Reading 2nd Reading 3rd Reading 1st Average
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Second Calibration Check Time: __1530_________
1st Reading 2nd Reading 3rd Reading 2nd Average
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Third Calibration Check (If Needed) Time: 1800
1st Reading 2nd Reading 3rd Reading 3rd Average
• Use the 20-Second Standard Mode Reading
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Material Description Type Location(s) Condition Estimated Amount Texture Coating 2% Chrysotile Room 13 Good 800 SF
Canvas Duct Connector 40% Chrysotile Fan Room Good HVAC Seam 9" x 9" White VFT/Mastic White VFT 2% Chrysotile Black Mastic 2% Chrysotile Under Carpet @ 1st Floor Hallways, Rooms 2, 3, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18 Good 3,550 SF 9" x 9" Black VFT/Mastic Black VFT 5% Chrysotile
Under Carpet @ Conference Room
Top Level, 2nd Floor Hallways, Rooms
20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29
Good 4,000 SF
12" x 12" White VFT/Mastic White VFT 5% Chrysotile Black Mastic 3% Chrysotile Conference Room @ Lower Level Good 700 SF Asbestos Identified During Inspection of the Pacific Grove Laboratory Site Inspection Conducted on May 26, 2015 by Auora Industrial Hygiene (Note: All the identified asbestos on the site was confined to the Main Building) Legend: VFT = Vinyl Floor Tile, SF = square feet
11. Asbestos (Supplement Sheet for Excess Real Property Checklist Ͳ NMFS Pacific Grove Laboratory)
Floor Room Side Component Substrate Color Condition % Lead 1 North Stairwell B Door Frame Metal Beige Intact 12.70 1 South East Stairwell Storage Room C Door Frame Metal White Intact 12.70 1 South East Stairwell Storage Room C Door Metal White Intact 10.60 2 Room 20A C Door Frame Metal White Intact 10.10
2 Room 20 B Door Frame Metal White Intact 10.70
2 Room 20 B Door Metal White Intact 8.20
2 Room 20 B Window Frame Metal White Intact 12.30
2 Room 20 C Door Frame Metal White Intact 2.40
2 Room 21 B Door Frame Metal White Intact 4.90
2 Room 22 B Door Frame Metal White Intact 3.20
2 Room 25 (Conference) D Door Frame Metal White Intact 7.40 2 Room 26A B Door Frame Metal White Intact 7.20
2 Room 29 C Door Frame Metal White Intact 13.70
2 Men's Restroom A Wall Tile (Toilet Area) Ceramic Tile Dark Pink Intact 14.50 2 Women's Restroom B Wall Tile (Shower/Sink Area) Ceramic Tile Dark Pink Intact 9.50 2 Fan Room D Door Frame Metal Beige Intact 9.40
2 Janitor Closet C Sink Porcelain White Intact 23.00
LeadͲBased Paint (LBP) Identified During Inspection of the Pacific Grove Laboratory Site Inspection Conducted on May 26, 2015 by Aurora Industrial Hygiene (Note: All the identified LBP on the site was confined to the Main Building)
14. LeadͲBased Paint (Supplemental Sheet for Excess Real Property Checklist Ͳ NMFS Pacific Grove Laboratory) Note: Side Column Identifies the Side of the Building Tested, A faces Lighthouse (south)
007011005000
LIGHTHOUSE AV
APN: 007011005000