Cities Index.
Item 3 – Regulatory Update from Keyes & Fox

Clean Energy Alliance Board of Directors
February 29, 2024

Document
Item 3 – Regulatory Update from Keyes & Fox
Meeting
February 29, 2024
Body
Clean Energy Alliance Board of Directors
Original file
143 KB
Text extracted from the CCA's file for reading and search. Open the original on thecleanenergyalliance.org. That file is the official record.

Clean Energy Alliance: An Introduction to Integrated
Resource Planning (IRP)
Tim Lindl – Keyes & Fox LLP
February 29, 2024
IRP Overview
● Senate Bill 350 (2015) established modern IRP proceedings. ○ IRPs operate on a roughly two-year cycle.
○ The current proceeding is at the tail end of that cycle. ● The goal of IRP: Determining how CA should structure its energy portfolio to meet the state’s clean energy goals, while ensuring reliability and affordability.
2 IRP Legal Framework
● The requirements and scope of IRP are rooted in statute. ● Section 454.51(a) requires that the Commission:
○ “Identify a diverse and balanced portfolio of resources needed to ensure a reliable electricity supply that provides optimal integration of renewable energy and resource diversity in a cost-effective manner.”
● Section 454.52 requires that the Commission order each LSE to file integrated resource plans:
○ Meeting CA’s emissions reduction targets.
○ Procure at least 60 percent eligible renewable energy resources by 12/31/30. ○ Fulfill the “obligation to serve its customers at just and reasonable rates.” ○ “Minimize impacts on ratepayers’ bills.”
○ Ensure reliability.
○ Address transmission and distribution related issues. 3 IRP Proceedings Are Critical to LSEs
● LSEs must formally plan for their procurement on rolling, multi-year timelines.
○ The Commission then approves or disapproves LSE submissions. ○ Decision is based on whether individual plan (i) includes resources matching the LSEs reliability need, (ii) meets the LSE’s emissions limits. ○ LSEs must also include a narrative with their submission. ● IRP decisions may dictate resource “winners and losers.” 4 The Current State of Play
● In January 2024, ALJ Fitch issued a Proposed Decision adopting the latest Preferred System Portfolio.
● The Proposed Decision initially adopted an inconsistent position regarding CEA’s individual submission.
○ In certain portions, CEA’s submission was deemed adequate and the decision stated that CEA ”provided all of the required information to an adequate degree or better[.]”
○ In other portions, the Proposed Decision listed CEA’s individual submission as “Not Yet Approved or Certified.”
● D.24-02-047 corrected the discrepancy; CEA’s IRP is certified. 5 The Current State of Play
● The Decision:
○ Adopts a Preferred System Portfolio that meets a 25 MMT GHG target for the electric sector in 2035.
○ Adopts that portfolio as the base case for the Transmission Planning Process. ● The Decision picks “winners and losers.”
○ Out-of-state wind is restricted based on transmission and demand related issues. ○ Off-shore wind in some areas is increased based on anticipated transmission availability.
● Next IRP will be due after November 2024 (and perhaps later)x 6 Thank you
Contact Info:

Tim Lindl
[email protected]
510-314-8385
7

← All documents from this meeting