Cities Index.
Correspondence Log

CleanPowerSF Sfpuc Commission
May 12, 2026

Document
Correspondence Log
Meeting
May 12, 2026
Body
CleanPowerSF Sfpuc Commission
Pages
57
Original file
104.2 MB
Text extracted from the CCA's file for reading and search. Open the original on sfpuc.sharefile.com. That file is the official record.

This email and its attachments are for inclusion in the record of the water and sewer rate increases to be considered by the SFPUC at the meeting currently scheduled for April 28, 2026.

These items are submitted as part of the record for agenda item 8, Public Hearing: (1) to consider whether to proceed with the proposed adoption of FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28 water rates and (2) to consider and adopt a new schedule of rates for retail water service in San Francisco and suburban areas, to be effective with meter readings on or after July 1, 2026. These items are also submitted as part of the record for agenda item 9, Public Hearing: (1) to consider whether to proceed with the proposed adoption of the FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28 sewer rates and (2) to consider and adopt a new annual schedule of rates for sewer service in San Francisco, to be effective with meter readings on or after July 1, 2026.

The City of San Francisco and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission in particular impeded the creation of a record for the SFPUC rate increase hearing by failing to produce records they were required to produce under the California Public Records Act. The emails and the attachments document this failure. The attachments to the emails I am sending you include City's NextRequest online description of the requests and City's Response for Requests 26-
1587 (https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/26-1587), Request 26-1651 (https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/26-1651), and Request 26-1652 (https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/26-1652).

This is one of a series of emails submitting the three requests as well as all records produced in response to them. Attached to this email are all of the records produced by SFFD in response to Request 26-1652.

The production consists of a single ESRI File Geodatabase (named CDD_Hydrants.gdb, delivered by City as a zip archive) containing hydrant location data. The file is in a format that is not human-readable and requires specialized GIS software (such as ArcGIS or QGIS) to open or view. It is submitted here so that the record reflects in full what City produced in response to the request.

Sincerely,
Donald Driscoll
2 Adryane Omens
Driscoll & Omens

Attorneys for:

Mark Roh, Ted Loewenberg, and Rose Aquilina

1 From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2026 10:17 AM
To: Commission
Subject: Record for SFPUC April 28, 2026 Rate Hearing: Failure of SFPUC to Comply with Public Records Act Request
Attachments: Driscoll Declaration Exhibits.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious To the SFPUC Commission:

This email and its attachment are for inclusion in the record of the water and sewer rate increases to be considered by the SFPUC at the meeting currently scheduled for April 28, 2026.

This item is submitted as part of the record for agenda item 8, Public Hearing: (1) to consider whether to proceed with the proposed adoption of FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28 water rates and (2) to consider and adopt a new schedule of rates for retail water service in San Francisco and suburban areas, to be effective with meter readings on or after July 1, 2026. This item is also submitted as part of the record for agenda item 9, Public Hearing: (1) to consider whether to proceed with the proposed adoption of the FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28 sewer rates and (2) to consider and adopt a new annual schedule of rates for sewer service in San Francisco, to be effective with meter readings on or after July 1, 2026.

The document was filed in San Francisco Superior Court.

Sincerely,
Donald Driscoll
Adryane Omens
Driscoll & Omens
Attorneys for:

Mark Roh, Ted Loewenberg, and Rose Aquilina

EXHIBITS TO THE DRISCOLL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
Adryane Omens, SBN 143126

DRISCOLL & OMENS
P.O. Box 6596
Albany, California 94706
Telephone: (510) 527-4500

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Plaintiff Classes

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

JENNIFER TOY, et al., individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs and Petitioners,

vs.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES
COMMISSION, and DOES 1 through 10,

Defendants and Respondents.

Lead Case No. CPF-22-517764
(Consolidated with Case No. CPF-23-518342)

EXHIBITS TO THE DRISCOLL

DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT (AQUILINA)

Hearing Date: February 13, 2025
Hearing Judge: Hon. Andrew Y.S. Cheng
Time: 9:30 AM
Place: Dept. 613

y,//dϭ
DD 2
1 CCSF Resps. and Objs. to RFAs, Set One; Case No. CPF-22-517764 n:\govlit\li2023\221061\01663976.docx 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

DAVID CHIU,
SBN 189542
City Attorney
WAYNE K. SNODGRASS, SBN 148137
SARA J. EISENBERG, SBN 269303
ALEXANDER J. HOLTZMAN, SBN 311813
Deputy City Attorneys
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102-4682
Telephone: (415) 554-4675
Facsimile: (415) 554-4699
E-Mail: [email protected]
[email protected]
Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
JENNIFER TOY, MICHELE DICKSTEIN, and
ROSE AQUILINA, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs and Petitioners,
vs.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES
COMMISSION, and DOES 1 – 10,
Defendants and Respondents.

Case No. CPF-22-517764

DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF
SAN FRANCISCO’S RESPONSES AND
OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST

SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
Date Action Filed: May 17, 2022
Trial Date: N/A
PROPOUNDING PARTY: Plaintiffs and Petitioners JENNIFER TOY, et al.

RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant and Respondent CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO
SET NO: ONE
DD 3
4 CCSF Resps. and Objs. to RFAs, Set One; Case No. CPF-22-517764 n:\govlit\li2023\221061\01663976.docx 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 2:

Admit that the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission is a department of the County and City of San Francisco.

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 2:

CCSF incorporates the foregoing preliminary statement and general objections as though fully set forth herein. CCSF further objects that its proper name is “City and County of San Francisco,” and CCSF interprets the Request to refer to its proper name.

Subject to, and without waiving, the foregoing objections, CCSF responds as follows:

Admitted to the extent the Request is read consistently with the understanding described above.

REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 3:

Admit that the County and City of San Francisco and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission are not separate legal entities.

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 3:

CCSF incorporates the foregoing preliminary statement and general objections as though fully set forth herein. CCSF further objects that its proper name is “City and County of San Francisco,” and CCSF interprets the Request to refer to its proper name. CCSF additionally objects that “separate legal entities” is vague and has different meanings in different contexts. CCSF interprets the Request to refer to whether SFPUC has a distinct legal existence for purposes of suing and being sued in the context of the claims in this litigation.

Subject to, and without waiving, the foregoing objections, CCSF responds as follows:

Admitted to the extent the Request is read consistently with the understanding described above.

REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 4:

Admit that the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission provides some public fire water service through County and City of San Francisco’s potable water system.

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 4:

CCSF incorporates the foregoing preliminary statement and general objections as though fully set forth herein. CCSF additionally objects that this Request goes to the merits of the case, rather than being required for class certification. CCSF further objects that its proper name is “City and County DD 4
17 CCSF Resps. and Objs. to RFAs, Set One; Case No. CPF-22-517764 n:\govlit\li2023\221061\01663976.docx 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
“auxiliary water supply system” in the Fire Code as “AWSS.” CCSF further objects to “financial responsibility” as vague, overbroad, and misleading especially in the context of CCSF’s operations and status as a public entity. Please refer to Exhibit A to CCSF’s Responses & Objections to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One. CCSF additionally objects that its proper name is “City and County of San Francisco,” and CCSF interprets the Request to refer to its proper name.

Subject to, and without waiving, the foregoing objections, CCSF responds as follows:

Admitted to the extent consistent with the understanding of the Request above and Exhibits A and C to CCSF’s Responses & Objections to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One, and otherwise denied.

REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 18:

Admit that San Francisco Public Utilities Commission rates are calculated to impose charges on residential water customers that include costs of public fire water.

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO.18:

CCSF incorporates the foregoing preliminary statement and general objections as though fully set forth herein. CCSF additionally objects that this Request, to the extent it has any relevance, goes to the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims rather than the currently open issue for discovery of class certification.

CCSF further objects that “San Francisco Public Utilities Commission rates” is vague and overbroad and interprets the term to refer to the water rates described in the 2018 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study and adopted by SFPUC on April 10, 2018 in Resolution No. 18-0053. CCSF additionally objects that “are calculated to impose charges” is vague and misleading and interprets the term to refer to the water rate setting described in the 2018 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study, adopted by SFPUC in Resolution No. 18-0053, and completed in accordance Proposition 218’s requirements. SFPUC also objects that “residential water customers” is undefined and interprets it to refer to the SFPUC’s classification of water customer accounts. CCSF further objects that “public fire water” is vague, overbroad, and misleading and construes the term to refer to costs associated with infrastructure and flows used at least in part for firefighting and excluding costs for associated with private fire protection. CCSF additionally objects to the lack of a referenced time in the Request and interprets it to refer solely to the present. Please refer to Exhibit B to CCSF’s Responses & Objections to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One.

DD 5
18 CCSF Resps. and Objs. to RFAs, Set One; Case No. CPF-22-517764 n:\govlit\li2023\221061\01663976.docx 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Subject to, and without waiving, the foregoing objections, CCSF responds as follows:

Admitted to the extent consistent with the understanding of the Request above and Exhibit B to CCSF’s Responses & Objections to Plaintiffs’ Form Interrogatories, Set One, and otherwise denied.

REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 19:

Admit that San Francisco Public Utilities Commission rates are calculated to impose charges on residential water customers that include costs of the EMERGENCY FIRE WATER SYSTEM.

EMERGENCY FIRE WATER SYSTEM refers to the system San Francisco Code section 901.8.3 identifies as the “auxiliary water supply system.” Section 901.8.3 states: “Any person performing any subsurface work in close proximity or adjacent to any valve, gate, hydrant, main, street cistern, or other part of the auxiliary water supply system (high pressure system), any hydrant, hydrant piping, or hydrant gate valve connected to the mains of the San Francisco Water Department shall comply with all Fire Department regulations and specifications, which are on file with the Department of Public Works Bureau of Engineering.”
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 19:

CCSF incorporates the foregoing preliminary statement and general objections as though fully set forth herein. CCSF further objects that section 901.8.3 of the San Francisco Fire Code quoted in the Request has no relevance to this case. CCSF additionally objects to the definition of “EMERGENCY FIRE WATER SYSTEM” as vague and misleading given the words of the referenced Fire Code provision. CCSF here refers to what it understands to be the system referenced as the “auxiliary water supply system” in the Fire Code as “AWSS.” CCSF additionally objects that this Request, to the extent it has any relevance, goes to the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims rather than the currently open issue for discovery of class certification. CCSF further objects that “San Francisco Public Utilities Commission rates” is vague and overbroad and interprets the term to refer to the water rates described in the 2018 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study and adopted by SFPUC in Resolution No. 18-0053. CCSF additionally objects that “are calculated to impose charges” is vague and misleading and interprets the term to refer to the water rate setting described in the 2018 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study, adopted in Resolution No. 18-0053, and completed in accordance Proposition 218’s requirements. CCSF also objects to “residential water customers” as DD 6
DD 7
y,//dϮ
DD 8
2020

URBAN WATER

MANAGEMENT
PLAN
for the City and County
of San Francisco
June 2021
Prepared by:

The San Francisco
Public Utilities Commission
DD 9
_6(&7,21 6\VWHP'HVFULSWLRQ
,Q&LW\'LVWULEXWLRQ6\VWHP
6DQ)UDQFLVFR¶VLQ&LW\GLVWULEXWLRQV\VWHP
3XEOLF:DWHU6\VWHP1R&$
ZDVRULJLQDOO\GHYHORSHGGXULQJ
WKH\HDUSHULRGEHWZHHQDQGUHIOHFWLQJWKHSDWWHUQVDQGUDWHVRIJURZWKLQWKH&LW\6HYHUDOPDMRU SLSHOLQHVFRQYH\5:6VXSSO\IURPWKH3HQLQVXOD6\VWHPWRWKH&LW\:DWHUWRWKHHDVWVLGHRIWKHLQ&LW\GLVWULEXWLRQ V\VWHPLVIHGE\WZRSLSHOLQHVWKDWWHUPLQDWHDW8QLYHUVLW\0RX QG5HVHUYRLU:DWHUWRWKHZHVWVLGHRIWKHLQ&LW\ GLVWULEXWLRQLVIHGE\WZRSLSHO LQHVWKDWWHUPLQDWHDW6XQVHW5 HVHUYRLUDQGRQHWKDWWHUPLQDWHVDW0HUFHG0DQRU 5HVHUYRLU$VVKRZQLQ)LJXUHWKHLQ&LW\GLVWULEXWLRQV\VWHPDOVRLQFOXGHVWHQUHVHUYRLUVDQGHLJKWZDWHUWDQNV WKDWVWRUHZDWHUVXSSOLHGE\WKH5:66HYHQWHHQSXPSVWDWLRQV DQGDSSUR[LPDWHO\PLOHVRISLSHOLQHVPRYH ZDWHUWKURXJKRXWWKHV\VWHPDQGGHOLYHUZDWHUWRKRPHVDQGEXVLQHVVHVLQWKH&LW\ :DWHU7UHDWPHQW
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¶VGLVLQIH FWLRQWUHDWPHQWSUDFWLFHH [WHQVLYHEDFWHULRORJLFDO TXDOLW\PRQLWRULQJDQGKLJKRSHUDWLRQDOVWDQGDUGVWKH86(Q YLURQPHQWDO3URWHFWLRQ$JHQF\ 86(3$
DQGWKH
6:5&%'LYLVLRQRI'ULQNLQJ:DWHU
'':

GHWHUPLQHGWKDWWKH+HWFK+HWFK\ZDWHUVRXUFHPHHWVIHGHUDODQG6WDWH GULQNLQJZDWHUTXDOLW\UHTXLUHPHQWVZLWKRXWWKHQHHGIRUILOWUDWLRQ $QHZ86(3$UHJXODWLRQWRRNHIIHFWLQUHTXLULQJVHFRQGDU\GLVLQIHFWLRQIRUDOOXQILOWHUHGGULQNLQJZDWHUV\VWHPV WR FRQWURO WKH ZDWHUERUQH SDUDVLWH FU\SWRVSRULGLXP 7R FRPSO\ Z LWK WKLV UHJXODWLRQ WKH 6)38& FRPSOHWHG

FRQVWUXFWLRQRIDQHZXOWUDYLROHW
89 WUHDWPHQWIDFLOLW\LQ7KH7HVOD7UHDWPHQW)DFLOLW\LVDNH\FRPSRQHQWRI WKH:DWHU6\VWHP,PSURYHPHQW3URJUDP
:6,3
DQGHQKDQFHVWKHKL JKTXDOLW\ ZDWHUIURPWKH5:67KHIDFLOLW\
KDVDFDSDFLW\RIPJGPDNLQJLWWKHWKLUGODUJHVW89GULQNLQJZDWHUGLVLQIHFWLRQIDFLOLW\LQWKH86 $OOZDWHUGHULYHGIURPVRXUFHVRWKHUWKDQ+HWFK+HWFK\5HVHUYRL ULVWUHDWHGDWRQHRIWZRWUHDWPHQWSODQWVWKH 69:73RUWKH+7:737KH69:73SULPDULO\WUHDWVZDWHUIURPWKH$ ODPHGD6\VWHPUHVHUYRLUVDQGKDVERWKD SHDN FDSDFLW\ DQG VXVWDLQDEOH FDSD FLW\ RI PJG 7UHDWPHQW SU RFHVVHV LQFOXGH FRDJXODWLRQ IORFFXODWLRQ

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

y,//dϯ

DD 11

SAN FRANCISCO

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
2023 Water and Wastewater Rate Study
FINAL REPORT / MAY 15, 2023
DD 12
445 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1925, Los Angeles, CA 90071 www.raftelis.com
May 15, 2023
Ms. Erin Corvinova
Financial Planning Director, Financial Services
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
Subject: 2023 Water and Wastewater Rate Study
Dear Ms. Corvinova:

Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. (Raftelis) is pleased to provide this Water and Wastewater Rate Study Report to the SFPUC. This report explains the methodologies and rationale used to develop a rate revenue requirement and rates for water and wastewater service for SFPUC retail customers.

The major study objectives include the following:
x Develop a financial plan
x Conduct a cost of service analysis for water and wastewater services x Develop fair, and equitable, water and wastewater rates over a three-year period x Conduct a customer impact analysis for the proposed water and wastewater rates It has been a pleasure working with you and we appreciate the support you, Matthew Freiberg, and other SFPUC staff have provided during this study.

Sincerely,

Steve Gagnon, PE (AZ) John Wright, CPA (CO)
Vice President Senior Manager
DD 13
Steve Gagnon, PE (AZ) John Wright, CPA (CO)
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission / 2023 Water and Wastewater Rate Study 23

contractually obligated and target debt service coverage requirements. The water revenue requirement from rates must include the cost of meeting both cash reserve and debt service coverage targets.

x Determining Annual Revenue Requirement from Rates: The final outcome of the financial planning process is the determination of the annual amount of rate revenue that must be recovered from customers to pay for all projected costs and meet financial targets.

3.2. Financial Plan Components

Existing Retail Water Rates
The SFPUC’s current water rates for retail customers in FY 2023 have been in effect since July 1, 2021 and were developed in the 2018 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study. Retail water customers are billed monthly and currently are subject to the rates and charges described below (and shown in Table 3-1):
» Fixed Monthly Service Charges: Each metered water connection is subject to a Fixed Monthly Service Charge based on the meter size each monthly billing period. Larger meter sizes are subject to higher charges because larger meters burden the water system with greater capacity-related and maintenance-related costs.

» Private Fire Service Fixed Monthly Service Charges: Each dedicated private fire service connection6 is subject to a Fire Service Fixed Monthly Service Charge based on service size each monthly billing period. Larger service sizes are subject to higher charges because larger services burden the water system with greater capacity-related costs.

» Variable Charges: Variable Charges are assessed per 100 CCF of water delivered within a monthly billing period. Residential Variable Charges are based on an inclining two-tier rate structure. Single Family Residential customers are charged at a lower rate for the first four CCF per month and a higher rate for all additional water use. Multiple-Family Residential customers are charged at a lower rate for the first three CCF per dwelling unit per month and a higher rate for all additional water use. Non-residential potable water customers are subject to a uniform rate per CCF for all usage. Non-potable customers receiving untreated water service are subject to a different uniform rate per CCF that excludes treatment and other potable-specific costs.

» Drought Surcharges: Drought Surcharges are in effect when the Commission adopts a resolution declaring Stage 1, Stage 2, or Stage 3 of the Retail Water Shortage Allocation Plan. Drought Surcharges are assessed as a percentage of Variable Charges and are based on a formula designed to recover the retail revenue shortfall due to reduced water sales during drought. Current surcharges are limited to up to 10% for Stage 1, up to 20% for Stage 2, and up to 25% for Stage 3.

Stage 1 Surcharges of 5% were in effect in FY 2022 and FY 2023, but were formally rescinded effective May 2023.

6 Private fire service connections include fire sprinkler systems, standpipes, and other private fire services.

DD 14
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission / 2023 Water and Wastewater Rate Study 25 Projected Water Units of Service
Projected units of service include the number of metered water connections by meter size (Table 3-2), private fire connections by service size (Table 3-3), and water use in CCF by customer class (Table 3-4). The number of metered water connections and private fire service connections is estimated from detailed account-level monthly billing data for FY 2022. As the service area is largely built out, the majority of growth is assumed to be redevelopment resulting in no net gain in service connections. Therefore, no change in the number of accounts or connections is assumed through FY 2028. Projected water demand by customer class is based on detailed demand forecasts incorporated into SFPUC staff’s 10-Year Financial Plan. SFPUC staff’s detailed water demand forecast is based on assumptions regarding population change, job growth, price elasticity (with respect to water rates), conservation trends, and changes in customer water use characteristics. Water demand is projected to increase by approximately 1.1% per year on average through FY 2028 relative to FY 2022 water demand, although demand does fluctuate from year to year. Overall demand is projected to decrease in FY 2024 due to reductions in wholesale water use, and in FY 2027 due to reductions in retail water use, for example.

Table 3-2: Projected Metered Water Connections
Table 3-3: Projected Private Fire Service Connections
Line
Number of Water Meters
(FY 2023-FY 2028)
In-City Retail
Paying
(excl. Treasure
Island)
Suburban Retail
Paying Other* Total
1 Water Meter Size
25 / 8 i n c h 125,811 181 12 126,004
33 / 4 i n c h 18,310 32 2 18,344
41 - i n c h 11,670 24 15 11,709
51 - 1 / 2 i n c h 5,480 13 9 5,502
62 - i n c h 7,423 30 48 7,501
73 - i n c h 676 1 1 678
84 - i n c h 456 3 28 487
96 - i n c h 249 16 33 298
10 8-inch 16 0 17 33
11 10-inch 26 1 8 26
12 12-inch 000 0
13 16-inch 101 2
14 Total Water Meters 170,094 306 184 170,584
*Other includes Treasure Island, Non-Paying Municipal, Recycled Water, Upcountry/Hetch Hetchy, & Wholesale Water Meters
Line
Number of Private Fire Service Connections
(FY 2023-FY 2028)
In-City
Retail
Suburban
Retail Total
1 Connection Size
21 - i n c h 186 0 186
31 - 1 / 2 i n c h 33 0 33
42 - i n c h 3,899 3 3,902
53 - i n c h 155 0 155
64 - i n c h 3,471 5 3,476
76 - i n c h 1,640 1 1,641
88 - i n c h 710 5 715
9 10-inch 61 7
10 12-inch 23 0 23
11 Total Private Fire Service Connections 10,123 15 10,138 DD 15
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission / 2023 Water and Wastewater Rate Study 39 » Treatment: relating to the treatment of water to potable standards » Water Quality: relating to water quality testing
» Meters: relating to water meters (including maintenance and replacement) » Hydrants / Alternative Water Supply System (AWSS): relating to fire protection provided by hydrants on both the primary potable water distribution system and the Alternative Water Supply System
» Private Fire Service: relating to private fire service connections » Customer Service: relating to meter reading, billing, customer call center services, and other customer service functions
» Indirect – General: relating to general administration and overhead, as well as any activities not directly attributable to one of the above functions » Revenue Offsets: relating specifically to any other revenues not attributed to any of the above functions
To allocate the retail water rate revenue requirement to the above functions, the following functional allocation bases were first established (see Table 4-2):
» O&M Functional Basis: SFPUC staff conducted a detailed analysis of the Water Enterprise’s FY 2024 budgeted operating and programmatic expenses. Expenses were evaluated at the departmental level and allocated across the various functions based on the best available information provided by each department’s management. Most departments allocated costs based on the percentage of staff time devoted to each functional activity. See Appendix B for detailed functional allocations.
» Debt Functional Basis: SFPUC staff conducted a detailed analysis of the Water Enterprise’s existing revenue bond debt service over the next five years (FY 2024-FY 2028). The debt service for each revenue bond series was individually allocated based on the functions of the associated capital projects funded by each bond series. See Appendix C for detailed functional allocations.
» CIP Functional Basis: SFPUC staff conducted a detailed analysis of the Water Enterprise’s planned CIP projects (both local and regional) over the next five years (FY 2024-FY 2028).

Each capital project was allocated on an individual basis to one or multiple functions. See Appendix D for detailed functional allocations.
» Wholesale Revenue Functional Basis: SFPUC staff conducted a detailed analysis of wholesale customers’ share of the Water Enterprise expenses over the next five years (FY 2024-FY 2028). This functional allocation basis is required to accurately allocate projected wholesale water sales revenue, which constitutes over 40% of total Water Enterprise revenues.

See Appendix E for detailed functional allocations.
» Federal Bond Interest Subsidy Functional Basis: The Water Enterprise’s federal bond interest subsidy is associated with three specific outstanding revenue bonds and one SRF Loan. A specific functional allocation basis was developed to accurately allocate this subsidy across the various functions. The debt service for each of the three associated revenue bonds and one SRF Loan was individually allocated based on the associated functions of the capital projects funded by each bond/loan. See Appendix F for detailed functional allocations. » Indirect Functional Basis: This functional allocation basis is not based on detailed analysis of expenses. It simply represents a 100% allocation to the “Indirect – General” function.

DD 16
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission / 2023 Water and Wastewater Rate Study 46 Table 4-6: Number of Water Meters and Equivalent Meter Units (In-City and Suburban Retail Only) DD 17

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission :DWHUDQG:DVWHZDWHU5DWH6WXG\ 61 7DEOH3URSRVHGDQG3URMHFWHG5HWDLO:DWHU5DWH6FKHGXOH
)<±)<

$

%

&

'

(

)

/LQH 3URSRVHG:DWHU5DWH6FKHGXOH
&XUUHQW

VLQFH

3URSRVHG
)<

3URSRVHG
)<

3URSRVHG
)<

3URMHFWHG
)<

3URMHFWHG
)<

)L[HG0RQWKO\6HUYLFH&KDUJHV
E\0HWHU6L]H

L Q F K
L QFK

L Q F K

L Q F K

L Q F K

L Q F K

L Q F K

L Q F K
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK

3ULYDWH)LUH)L[HG0RQWKO\6HUYLFH&KDUJHV
E\6HUYLFH6L]H

LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK

9DULDEOH&KDUJHV
SHU&&)

6LQJOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
)LUVW8QLWVSHU0RQWK
$OO$GGLWLRQDO8QLWV

0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
)LUVW8QLWVSHU'ZHOOLQJ8QLWSHU0RQWK
$OO$GGLWLRQDO8QLWV

&RPPHUFLDO,QGXVWULDODQG*HQHUDO8VHV
)RU$OO8QLWVRI:DWHU

8QWUHDWHG:DWHU6HUYLFH
)RU$OO8QLWVRI:DWHU
DD 18
)L[HG0RQWKO\6HUYLFH&KDUJHV
E\0HWHU6L]H

LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
)LUVW8QLWVSHU0RQWK
$OO$GGLWLRQDO8QLWV

0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
)LUVW8QLWVSHU'ZHOOLQJ8QLWSHU0RQWK
$OO$GGLWLRQDO8QLWV
9DULDEOH&KDUJHV
SHU&&)

6LQJOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO

y,//dϰ

DD 19
DD 20
SFPUC WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY CHAPTER 4 | APRIL 2014 37 Ȉ ‹”‡‡–‡”“—‹˜ƒŽ‡–• – Similar
–‘ –Ї •‡r˜i
‡
Šar‰‡•ǡ Ƥr‡ m‡–‡r
equivalents are derived based on
meter equivalents. The total num-
ber of meter equivalents is based
on ’rivate Ƥre ’rote
tion meters.

For the meter capacity charges and
Ƥre protectionǡ equivalent meters are
used, as opposed to accounts, in order
to recognize the fact that larger meters
have a higher ™ater ƪo™ potential
and utilize greater system capacity.

The meter maintenance portion of the
monthly Ƥšed charge also accounts
for meter size, as it is more expensive
to install, maintain, and replace larger
meters. Meter equivalents are derived
based on the hydraulic capacity (gal-
lons per minutes) respective to the size
of the meter. Meter equivalents are
set based on the hydraulic ƪo™ of a ͱȀʹ
inch meter.

Customer Class Allocation
The unit costs of each component
sho™n in Table Ͱ.Ͳ are then applied
to each customer classes’ projected
use, accounts, and meter equivalents
to derive customer class allocations.

Projections are based on current use
and accounts with assumed growth.

As such, costs are allocated to each
customer class based on their respec-
tive base usage and peaking factors to
reƪect the use of the overall system.

Table Ͱ.ͳ details the proportional cost
allocation for each customer class
based on the information in Table Ͱ.ͱ
and Table Ͱ.Ͳ.

RATE DESIGN
The water rate design analysis deter-
mines how the costs are recovered by
each customer through speciƤed water
rates. The focus of this process is to
achieve full cost recovery and substanti-
ate that customers are paying their fair
and proportionate share of system costs.

The SFPUC’s existing rate structure
consists of two components: a
commodity charge (variable) and
a monthly service charge (Ƥxed).

Table 4.5 | SFPUC Water Enterprise Unit of Service by Customer Class Base Peak Day Peak Hour
Meter
Capacity
Charges
Customer
Services
Private Fire
Protection
Annual
Usageͭ
Max Day
Usageͭ
Max Hour
Usageͭ
Meter
Equivalents
Customer
Accounts
Hydrant
Equivalents
Single Family ͳ,ʹͰʹ,ͯͱͱ ͮ ,ͯͱͰ,ͱͬͳ ͭͭ ,ͭͰͰ,ͲͲͰ ͭͮͯ,ʹʹͮ ͭͭͮ,ʹͳͬ - Multi-family ͭͬ,ͳͳʹ,ͳͳͲ ͯ ,ͮͯͯ,Ͳͯͯ ͭͱ ,ͯͬͱ,ʹͲͭ ͵Ͱ ,ͯͲͲ ͯͳ ,ͲͲ͵ - Commercial, Industrial, General ͭͬ,ͱͮ͵,ͳʹͲ Ͱ ,ͮͭͭ,͵ͭͰ ͭͲ ,ʹͰͳ,Ͳͱʹ Ͳͭ ,ͱͯͳ ͭͳ ,ͬͰͭ - Public Uses ͭ,ͭͲͯ,ͭͰͱ ͯͰʹ ,͵ͰͰ ͭ ,ͲͰͲ,ͬͱͬ ͭͱ ,ͯͯ͵ ͭ ,ͳͬͰ - Interruptible ͭ,ͬͳͱ,ʹͰ͵ ͯͮͮ,ͳͱͱ ͭ,ͱͮͮ,ͱͭͭ Ͱ,ͳʹ͵ ͭ,ͱͭʹ - Docks and Shipping ͮʹͭ,ͳ͵ʹ ͯͯʹ ,ͭͱʹ ʹͳͬ ,ͳͱͲ ͱͭ ͯ -
Fire Service ͮͮ,ͳͬ͵ ͵ ,ͬʹͰ ͯͲ ,ͯͯͰ - ʹ,ͱͳʹ ͮͯͬ ,Ͱͮʹ
Builders and Contractors ͳͲ,ͱʹͮ Ͳʹ ,͵ͮͰ ͭ͵ͯ ,ͳͱͮ ͭ ,͵ͬͲ ͮͬͮ - Contract ͭͯͰ,͵Ͱͱ ͭͮͭ ,Ͱͱͭ ͯͰͭ,ͯ͵ͯ ͮͲͬ ͭͰ -
Airport ͱͳͱ,ͬͱͰ ͱͭͳ,ͱͰ͵ ͭ,ͰͱͰ,ʹʹͳ ͱͱͬ Ͳ -
Total ͯͮ,ͰʹͲ,͵͵ʹ ͭͭ,Ͱͱ͵,ͰͰͯ Ͱ͵,ͮͯʹ,ͯʹͲ ͯͬͮ,Ͳͳ͵ ͭͳ͵,ͲͬͰ ͮͯͬ,Ͱͮʹ Note:
ȋͭȌ ‹t• ‹•
ˆ ȋͭ
ˆ γ ͳͰʹ ‰ƒŽŽo•ȌǤ
Table 4.6 | SFPUC Water Enterprise FYE 2015 Unit Costs
Base Peak Day Peak Hour
Meter Capacity
Charges
Customer
Services
Private Fire
Protection
Allocation
Percentages Ͳʹά ʹά ͭͬά ʹά Ͱά ͮά
Allocable to
Component ͈ͭͰͱ,ͰʹͰ,͵ͱͰ ͈ͭͳ,ͭͮͮ,ʹ͵ͱ ͈ͮͮ,ͮͲʹ,Ͱͳͮ ͈ͭͲ,ͱ͵ͱ,ͮͭͬ ͈͵,ͭͮͯ,ͬͳͮ ͈ͯ,͵ͬͳ,ʹͳ͵ Total Units ͯͮ,ͰʹͲ,͵͵ʹ ͭͭ,Ͱͱ͵,ͰͰͯ Ͱ͵,ͮͯʹ,ͯʹͲ ͯͬͮ,Ͳͳ͵ ͭͳ͵,ͲͬͰ ͮͯͬ,Ͱͮʹ Allocation Basis Annual Usage Max Day Usage Max Hour Usage Meter Equivalents
Customer
Accounts
Hydrant
Equivalents
Per Unit Cost ͈Ͱ.Ͱʹ ͈ͭ.Ͱ͵ ͈ͬ.Ͱͱ ͈Ͱ.ͱͳ ͈Ͱ.ͮͯ ͈ͭ.

Ͱͭ
DD 21

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission / 2023 Water and Wastewater Rate Study 61 Table 5-7: Proposed and Projected Retail Water Rate Schedule (FY 2024 – FY 2028) (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)
Line Proposed Water Rate Schedule
Current
(since
7/1/2021)
Proposed
FY 2024
(7/1/2023)
Proposed
FY 2025
(7/1/2024)
Proposed
FY 2026
(7/1/2025)
Projected
FY 2027
(7/1/2026)
Projected
FY 2028
(7/1/2027)
1 Fixed Monthly Service Charges (by Meter Size)
25 / 8 i n c h $15.17 $16.64 $17.48 $18.36 $19.10 $19.87 33 / 4 i n c h $19.43 $21.13 $22.19 $23.30 $24.24 $25.21 41 - i n c h $27.95 $30.11 $31.62 $33.21 $34.54 $35.93
51 - 1 / 2 i n c h $49.25 $52.56 $55.19 $57.95 $60.27 $62.69 62 - i n c h $74.81 $79.51 $83.49 $87.67 $91.18 $94.83
73 - i n c h $142.97 $151.35 $158.92 $166.87 $173.55 $180.50 84 - i n c h $219.65 $232.18 $243.79 $255.98 $266.22 $276.87 96 - i n c h $432.65 $456.70 $479.54 $503.52 $523.67 $544.62 10 8-inch $688.25 $726.13 $762.44 $800.57 $832.60 $865.91 11 10-inch $1,071.65 $1,130.26 $1,186.78 $1,246.12 $1,295.97 $1,347.81 12 12-inch $1,838.45 $1,938.54 $2,035.47 $2,137.25 $2,222.74 $2,311.65 13 16-inch $3,201.65 $3,375.47 $3,544.25 $3,721.47 $3,870.33 $4,025.15 14 15 Private Fire Fixed Monthly Service Charges (by Service Size) 16 1-inch $9.55 $8.43 $8.86 $9.31 $9.69 $10.08
17 1-1/2 inch $12.45 $8.91 $9.36 $9.83 $10.23 $10.64
18 2-inch $15.93 $9.73 $10.22 $10.74 $11.17 $11.62
19 3-inch $25.21 $12.70 $13.34 $14.01 $14.58 $15.17
20 4-inch $35.65 $17.82 $18.72 $19.66 $20.45 $21.27
21 6-inch $64.65 $36.19 $38.00 $39.90 $41.50 $43.16
22 8-inch $99.45 $67.88 $71.28 $74.85 $77.85 $80.97
23 10-inch $151.65 $115.55 $121.33 $127.40 $132.50 $137.80 24 12-inch $256.05 $181.62 $190.71 $200.25 $208.26 $216.60 25 26 Variable Charges (per CCF)
27 Single-Family Residential
28 First 4 Units per Month $9.60 $10.33 $10.85 $11.40 $11.86 $12.34 29 All Additional Units $10.71 $11.47 $12.05 $12.66 $13.17 $13.70 30 31 Multiple-Family Residential
32 First 3 Units per Dwelling Unit per Month $9.60 $10.19 $10.70 $11.24 $11.69 $12.16 33 All Additional Units $10.76 $10.94 $11.49 $12.07 $12.56 $13.07 34 35 Commercial, Industrial, and General Uses
36 For All Units of Water $10.55 $11.12 $11.68 $12.27 $12.77 $13.29 37 38 Untreated Water Service
39 For All Units of Water $0.95 $1.80 $1.89 $1.99 $2.07 $2.16 DD 22
1 Fixed Monthly Service Charges (by Meter Size)
Variable Charges (per CCF)
Single-Family Residen
Multiple-Family Residentia
$16.64 $17.48 $18.36
$21.13 $22.19 $23.30
$30.11 $31.62 $33.21
$52.56 $55.19 $57.95
$79.51 $83.49 $87.67
$151.35 $158.92 $166.87
$232.18 $243.79 $255.98
$456.70 $479.54 $503.52
$726.13 $762.44 $800.57
$1,130.26 $1,186.78 $1,246.12
$1,938.54 $2,035.47 $2,137.25
$3,375.47 $3,544.25 $3,721.47
$9.60 $10.33 $10.85 $11.40
$10.71 $11.47 $12.05 $12.66
$9.60 $10.19 $10.70 $11.24
$10.76 $10.94 $11.49 $12.07

y,//dϱ

DD 23
PMQ: Erin Corvinova
July 10, 2023
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
3 4 JENNIFER TOY, MICHELLE DICKSTEIN, )
and ROSE AQUILINA, individually and )
5 on behalf of all others similarly )
situated, )
6)
Plaintiffs and Petitioners, )
7 ) Case No.:
vs. ) CPF-22-517764
8)

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, )
9 SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES )
COMMISSION, and DOES 1 through 10, )
10 )
Defendants and Respondents. )
11 ____________________________________)
12 13
14 DEPOSITION OF
15 ERIN CORVINOVA, PERSON MOST QUALIFIED
16 FOR CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
17 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA
18 MONDAY, JULY 10, 2023
19 20
21 22 ATKINSON-BAKER, A Veritext Company
(818) 551-7300
23 24
FILE NO.: AB 6003191
25 REPORTED BY: MAXIMILLIAN A. CONTRERAS, CSR #13876

Page 1 ends

Atkinson-Baker, A Veritext Company
(818) 551-7300 www.veritext.com
DD 24
PMQ: Erin Corvinova
July 10, 2023
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
3 4 JENNIFER TOY, MICHELLE DICKSTEIN, )
and ROSE AQUILINA, individually and )
5 on behalf of all others similarly )
situated, )
6)
Plaintiffs and Petitioners, )
7 ) Case No.:
vs. ) CPF-22-517764
8)

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, )
9 SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES )
COMMISSION, and DOES 1 through 10, )
10 )
Defendants and Respondents. )
11 ____________________________________)
12 13
14 15 DEPOSITION OF ERIN CORVINOVA, PERSON MOST
16 QUALIFIED FOR CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
17 taken on behalf of Plaintiffs and Petitioners,
18 at Veritext Legal Solutions, 1 Kaiser Plaza, Suite 250, 19 Oakland, California 94612, commencing at 10:00 AM
20 and concluding at 11:32 AM, Monday, July 10, 2023,
21 before Maximillian A. Contreras, CSR #13876.
22 23
24 25

Page 2 ends

Atkinson-Baker, A Veritext Company
(818) 551-7300 www.veritext.com
DD 25
PMQ: Erin Corvinova
July 10, 2023
1 THE WITNESS: Not for --
2 We've looked at the sum total of costs in the
3 category of the hydrants and the AWSS. But I don't
4 believe we've parceled it out to the specific customer 5 categories that you're asking for. At least I have not 6 personally been involved in that.
7 BY ATTY. DRISCOLL:
8 Q. When you say "we've looked at it," what do you
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 mean?
A. I mean that knowing -- knowing that there's
a lawsuit regarding these expenditures on the hydrants
and the AWSS -- to refresh my memory, if nothing else,
I reviewed the costs in that category.

Q. And this was in your role doing financial
planning?
A. Yes. Although I was only in the last year
promoted to be the Financial Planning Director,
and prior to that I was the Rates Administrator.

So primarily I'm specifically focused on rates.

Q. So did you consider what impact would be
on rates?
22 A. The impact of what?
23 Q. If public fire service were excluded from
24 rates, did you consider what the impact would be
25 on rates?

Page 35 ends

Atkinson-Baker, A Veritext Company
(818) 551-7300 www.veritext.com
DD 26
PMQ: Erin Corvinova
July 10, 2023
1 A. I have not specifically calculated the
2 difference.
3 Q. Right. But you've -- have you considered
4 whether it could be calculated?
5 A. Have I considered whether it could be
6 calculated? I suppose, yes.
7 Q. You have considered that? That's something
8 that could be calculated; right?
9 ATTY. SNODGRASS: Calls for speculation.
10 And outside of the subject of the designation.
11 But go ahead and answer if you can.
12 THE WITNESS: I believe that that could be
13 calculated.
14 BY ATTY. DRISCOLL:
15 Q. Now, you got considerable expertise as
16 Rate Administrator. Now in your current position,
17 how would you calculated it?
18 A. Can you define what "it" is.
19 Q. The "it" is if public fire service were
20 removed from residential rates, how would you calculate 21 the change in residential rates?
22 ATTY. SNODGRASS: Calls for speculation.
23 Do you understand what he means by "public fire
24 service"?
25 THE WITNESS: I'm assuming it's the hydrants

Page 36 ends

Atkinson-Baker, A Veritext Company
(818) 551-7300 www.veritext.com
DD 27
PMQ: Erin Corvinova
July 10, 2023
1 and the AWSS.
2 BY ATTY. DRISCOLL:
3 Q. Yes, and I'm not asking for speculation.
4 I'm asking pursuant to the methodology used in the 2023 5 and 2018 rate studies. What would happen?
6 A. The hydrants and the AWSS are a separate cost
7 bucket for purposes of allocating costs. If you were to 8 exclude those from the rates as a whole, you would
9 subtract that total cost out of the revenue requirement, 10 which is the amount of revenue to be collected from 11 rates. Essentially just delete the dollar amount
12 as a line item and see what that did.
13 Q. And when you say "see what that did,"
14 you're saying that because this process usees Excel 15 spreadsheets and the change would work its way through 16 to the conclusion as to what the rate was?
17 A. That's correct, yes.
18 Q. And you wouldn't have to know anything about
19 individual customers to do this, would you? This would 20 be something that would be done on a uniform basis? 21 ATTY. SNODGRASS: Vague and ambiguous.
22 Go ahead and answer if you have an understanding.
23 THE WITNESS: For the -- it'd be uniform
24 across each customer class, yes.
25 ///

Page 37 ends

Atkinson-Baker, A Veritext Company
(818) 551-7300 www.veritext.com
DD 28
PMQ: Erin Corvinova
July 10, 2023
1 BY ATTY. DRISCOLL:
2 Q. And that's -- this simple method where things
3 work their way through spreadsheets so you could
4 determine what deleting costs associated with public 5 fire service did to rates, that's been true the entire 6 time you worked at SFPUC; right?
7 A. Some of the spreadsheets are more complicated
8 than others and not quite as neatly automated. But you 9 could get to the outcome sometimes with a little more 10 work. It wouldn't be as simple.
11 Q. It would basically be mechanical work,
12 numbers moved from one sheet to another; right?
13 A. I --
14 15
16 17
18 19
ATTY. SNODGRASS: You're asking whether that
characterization has applied at all times since she
began working for the PUC?
ATTY. DRISCOLL: Yeah.

THE WITNESS: I believe that's correct, yes. BY ATTY.

DRISCOLL:
20 Q. Do you know anything about the recordkeeping
21 of the SFPUC?
22 ATTY. SNODGRASS: Vague and ambiguous.
23 THE WITNESS: Some, but not like core job.
24 I'm passingly familiar.
25 ///

Page 38 ends

Atkinson-Baker, A Veritext Company
(818) 551-7300 www.veritext.com
DD 29
PMQ: Erin Corvinova
July 10, 2023
1 BY ATTY. DRISCOLL:
2 Q. Do you know how long billing information
3 is kept?
4 A. No, I do not.
5 Q. Have you ever looked up old billing
6 information?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. And how far back have you gone?
9 A. Our current billing system was implemented in 10 2009, and I'm aware that it's possible to look up
11 records to 2009 in at least the current billing system. 12 Q. You can look up bills and you can look up 13 payments also; right?
14 A. That's correct.
15 ATTY. SNODGRASS: Just for the record,
16 this is also well outside of the scope of the witness' 17 designation.
18 ATTY. DRISCOLL: Not an objection, but -- 19 ATTY. SNODGRASS: Just for the record.
20 ATTY. HOLTZMAN: It is an objection. Because 21 the question is whether she's testifying in her personal 22 capacity or on behalf of the Defendants. And as to 23 these questions, you are taking a personal deposition. 24 ATTY. DRISCOLL: No, I'm not. But we don't 25 have to discuss this on the record.

Page 39 ends

Atkinson-Baker, A Veritext Company
(818) 551-7300 www.veritext.com
DD 30
PMQ: Erin Corvinova
July 10, 2023
1 BY ATTY. DRISCOLL:
2 Q. Is it your understanding that you're here
3 today as an employee of SFPUC?
4 A. And of the City and County of San Francisco. 5 Q. Technically SPFUC is not separate, it's simply 6 a department of the City?
7 ATTY. SNODGRASS: Calls for a legal
8 conclusion. Go ahead and answer if you have
9 an understanding.
10 THE WITNESS: That is my understanding.
11 BY ATTY. DRISCOLL:
12 Q. What did you do as a Rate Analyst for the 13 SFPUC?
14 A. I held several positions over the years from 15 senior to principal Rate Analyst. In those roles, I was 16 an assistant or lead analyst calculating and setting 17 the rates and fees for our water, power and sewer
18 enterprises.
19 Q. And what's your position now?
20 A. I'm currently the Financial Planning Director. 21 Q. What do you do in that position?
22 A. The Financial Planning team includes the Rates 23 team. And so I manage the people doing my old job. 24 We also do financial forecasts of the agency's revenues 25 and expenditures to help inform decisionmaking around

Page 50 ends

Atkinson-Baker, A Veritext Company
(818) 551-7300 www.veritext.com
DD 31
PMQ: Erin Corvinova
July 10, 2023
1 investments. That sort of thing.
2 Q. Who is it currently doing your old position? 3 A. That position is currently vacant.
4 Matt Freiberg is acting in the role.
5 Q. Were you involved with the 2014 rate study? 6 A. No, I was not.
7 Q. As a Rate Analyst, were you familiar with it? 8 A. It was completed before I joined SFPUC.
9 However, I have at times over the years reviewed some 10 of the information from that study.
11 Q. And have you reviewed any of the spreadsheets 12 associated with that cost-of-service study?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. Is it similar to the more recent rate studies 15 in that you can remove a line item and with some manual 16 copying of numbers, of what the impact on rates would 17 be?
18 ATTY. SNODGRASS: Calls for speculation.
19 But answer if you have an understanding.
20 THE WITNESS: I'm significantly less
21 familiar with that Excel model, so I'm not certain. 22 But generally, no. Rate studies -- the methodology 23 for doing rate studies has not changed significantly 24 since 2014.
25 ///

Page 51 ends

Atkinson-Baker, A Veritext Company
(818) 551-7300 www.veritext.com
DD 32
PMQ: Erin Corvinova
July 10, 2023
1 REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE
2 3
4 I, MAXIMILLIAN A. CONTRERAS, CSR #13876,
5 Certified Shorthand Reporter, certify:
6 That the foregoing proceedings were taken
7 before me at the time and place therein set forth,
8 at which time the witness was put under oath by me;
9 That the testimony of the witness, the
10 questions propounded, and all objections and statements 11 made at the time of the examination were recorded
12 stenographically by me and were thereafter transcribed; 13 That the foregoing is a true and correct
14 transcript of my shorthand notes so taken.
15 I further certify that I am not a relative or 16 employee of any attorney of the parties, nor financially 17 interested in the action.
18 I declare under penalty of perjury under
19 the laws of California that the foregoing is true and 20 correct.
21 Dated this 26th day of July, 2023.
22 23
24 <%27291,Signature%>
MAXIMILLIAN A. CONTRERAS
25 CSR #13876

Page 57 ends

Atkinson-Baker, A Veritext Company
(818) 551-7300 www.veritext.com
DD 33

y,//dϲ

DD 34
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
2018 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study
Carollo Engineers, Inc.
870 Market Street, Suite 728 ‡ San Francisco, CA 94102
415-399-1601
carollo.com
DD 35
April 2018 SFPUC Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study 8 Functional Allocation Results
Based on functional category, the units of service are volume of water consumed, meter equivalents, annual bills (based on customer accounts), and fire protection meters. In order to allocate the cost of service to various user classes, unit costs of service are developed for each functional cost component. As shown in Table 4, the total rate revenue requirements are allocated to each functional component for the four-year average. The total cost for each functional category is then divided by the total number of associated units of service to determine appropriate unit costs for the Water Enterprise. Table 4 shows the calculation of the unit costs for each functional component, which are then applied to each customer classes’ projected use, accounts, and meter equivalents to derive customer class allocations for each year of the rate period.

TABLE 4 WATER SYSTEM UNIT COST (FY 2019) (1)
BASE USAGE PEAK USAGE (2)

METER CAPACITY
CHARGE

CUSTOMER

SERVICE

PRIVATE FIRE

PROTECTION
RAW
WATER

PUBLIC FIRE

PROTECTION
Allocation Percent 53.1% 22.9% 7.2% 4. 1% 0.9% 10.0% 1.8% Value Allocable to
Component (A) $146.2 $63.0 $19.7 $11. 3 $2.6 $27.6 $4.8 Total Units (B) 29,574,387 14,494,521 298,594 175, 897 229,685 29,669,585 298,594 Allocation Basis(3) Annual Use
(ccf)
Annualized
Max Day
Excess Use
(ccf)
Meter
Equivalents
Customer
Accounts
Hydrant
Equivalents
Annual Use
(ccf)
Meter
Equivalents
Per Unit Cost
= A ÷ B $4.95 $4.35 $5.50 $5. 34 $0.93 $0.93 $1.35
Notes:
(1) Allocable values are rounded to the nearest million and unit costs are rounded up to the nearest $0.01. (2) The SFPUC peaking factor of 1.31 times the average day demand annualized (or times 365) yields max day excess use. (3) Ccf is one hundred cubic feet, 1 ccf = 748 gallons.

Projections are based on current customer usage characteristics and account growth assumptions, respective to their base usage and peaking factors. Based on available consumption and customer records, Table 5 details the total units of service for each customer class and functional category in accordance with their percentage allocation. This customer data is then used to determine appropriate proportional allocation of revenue requirements to each customer class.

TABLE 5 WATER SYSTEM ALLOCATION OF REVENUE REQUIREMENTS BY CLASS (FY 2019 – FY 2022 AVERAGE) (1)

CUSTOMER CLASSES
PERCENT ALLOCATION (%)

BASE USAGE PEAK USAGE
METER

EQUIVALENTS

CUSTOMER

ACCOUNTS

PRIVATE FIRE

PROTECTION
RAW
WATER

PUBLIC FIRE

PROTECTION
Single Family Residential $35.3 $13.9 $8.1 $7.1 $6.7 $1.1 Multifamily Residential $53. 8 $20.5 $6.3 $2.4 $10.1 $1.4 Residential Irrigation $0.6 $0.8 $0.1 $0.02 $0.1
Commercial/Industrial $47.1 $18.5 $4.0 $8.9 $1.9
Municipal $4.7 $2.1 $0.7 $1.1 $0.9 $0.3
Nonresidential Irrigation $4.1 $6.1 $0.5 $0.1 $0.8
Docks & Ships $0.02 $0. 1 $0.01 $0.0004 $0.0003 $0.0003 Builder & Contractors $0. 4 $0.8 $0.1 $0.01 $0.1 $0.05
Fire Service $0.1 $0.1 $0.5 $2.6 $0.02
Nonpotable (Raw Water) $0.01 $0.0001 $0.1
Total $147.2 $63.0 $19.7 $11.3 $2.6 $27.6 $4.8
Notes:
(1) Values are rounded and expressed in million dollars. Values may not add up due to rounding.

The water rate design analysis determines how the costs are recovered from each customer through specified water rates. The focus of this analysis is to achieve full cost recovery and substantiate that DD 36
$1.1
$1.4

y,//dϳ

DD 37

AGENDA ITEM
Public Utilities Commission
City and County of San Francisco
DEPARTMENT Financial Services AGENDA NO. 6
MEETING DATE May 23, 2023

APPROVAL:

COMMISSION
SECRETARY Donna Hood

Public Hearing: Adopt Retail Water Rates for FYE 2024 through FYE 2026 Project Manager: Matthew Freiberg
Summary of
Proposed
Commission
Action:

Public Hearing to consider and adopt a new three-year schedule of rates for retail water service in San Francisco and suburban areas to be effective with meter readings on or after July 1, 2023. This action constitutes the Approval Action for the Project for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to San Francisco Administrative Code section 31.04(h). The Planning Department has determined that this action is exempt from the CEQA. If the item is approved, the Commission will rely on that determination to make its decision.

Background: Executive Summary
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) staff developed the proposed water rates in conformance with the requirements of the San Francisco Charter, at section 8B.125, and the California Constitution, at Article XIII-D (Proposition 218).

The rates proposal is the result of a year-long process that involved policy review, economic analysis, and public outreach. This work has been guided by the governance of a project charter and overseen by a project steering committee that included the General Manager, the SFPUC Executive Team and a staff working group from across the organization. As required by the Charter Section 8B.125, the rate proposal was developed with the support of an independent rate consultant that completed a cost-of-service analysis and rate design, consistent with the requirements of Proposition 218. The results of the study were also presented to the Rate Fairness Board. The findings of the study are summarized in the consultant’s report titled the 2023 SFPUC Water and Wastewater Rate Study (2023 Rate Study).

The 2023 Rate Study is comprised of three main components: a revenue requirement analysis, cost of service analysis, and rate design. After completing this rigorous process, and considering the recommendations of the independent rate consultant, SFPUC staff has determined rate increases are necessary to maintain revenue sufficiency and to meet operational goals. Over the next three years, Fiscal Year Ending (FYE) 2024 through FYE 2026, staff proposes to raise rates such that the average single family water bill increases by an average of 6% annually, as referenced in Table 1.

DD 38
Proposal to Adopt Water Rates for FYE 2024 through FYE 2026 Commission Meeting Date: May 23, 2023

Page 2 ends

Table 1. Proposed Average Monthly Single Family Residential Water Bill Proposed Rates
Average
Percent
Increase
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026
Current
Rates
Effective
July 1, 2023
Effective
July 1, 2024
Effective
July 1, 2025
Water Fixed
Charge $15.17 $16.64 $17.48 $18.36
Water Variable
Charge $46.97 $50.50 $53.04 $55.73
Water Bill $62.14 $67.14 $70.52 $74.09
% Increase 8.0% 5.0% 5.0% 6.0%
Notes: Assumes 5/8” meter size and 4.8 CCF (centum (hundred) cubic feet or 748 gallons) monthly water usage. Bills are calculated excluding any drought surcharge that has been applied to the current variable charge.

Due to changes in cost allocations to customer classes and rate components as part of the cost-of-service analysis and rate design, bill increases will not exactly match the changes in rate revenue requirements in year one of the rate implementation. Bill increases will track with the proposed rate revenue requirements in all other years.

Overview of 2023 Water and Wastewater Rate Study
As required by the San Francisco Charter, the SFPUC retains an independent rate consultant at least every five years to evaluate the cost of service of the retail water and sewer systems and to recommend appropriate rate structures. The rate study is an engineering and financial exercise that explains the basis and rationale for proposed water rates, supported by a cost-of-service analysis, and provides an administrative record to satisfy the legal requirements of California’s Proposition 218 and the Charter.

The previous water and wastewater rate study was completed in 2018 and supported rates for the four-year period beginning FY 2018-19 through FY 2021-22. The proposed rates of the next three years support the ongoing operations and maintenance costs, payments of debt service, and implementation of the SFPUC capital improvement program.

The SFPUC selected the consulting team of McGovern McDonald Engineering and Raftelis Financial Consulting as the independent rate consultant through a competitive Request for Proposals process. Staff and the independent rate consultant have been working on the 2023 SFPUC Water and Wastewater Rate Study since summer 2022. Staff have coordinated internally with the Water Enterprise leadership, Business Services, External Affairs, the General Manager’s Office, and the Rate Fairness Board to receive input and management direction on a wide range of topics, including the impact of the drought and customer water conservation on the SFPUC’s finances, capital financing forecasts, residential tiers, fixed/variable cost recovery, non-residential customer classes, as well as analysis of customer affordability.

DD 39
Proposal to Adopt Water Rates for FYE 2024 through FYE 2026 Commission Meeting Date: May 23, 2023

Page 3 ends

This report presents the outcome of the 2023 Rate Study, highlighting each major task and outcome. This rate study is the basis for proposed water and sewer rate increases resulting in an 8.4% average annual increase, over the next three years, on the single family residential combined monthly bill as noted below in Table 2.

Table 2. Proposed Average Monthly Single Family Residential Combined Bill Proposed Rates
Average
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026
Current
Rates
Effective
July 1, 2023
Effective
July 1, 2024
Effective
July 1, 2025
Water $62.14 $67.14 $70.52 $74.09
Sewer $74.20 $81.51 $90.01 $99.45
Combined $136.34 $148.64 $160.53 $173.53
% Increase 9.0% 8.0% 8.1% 8.4%
Note: Assumes 5/8” meter size and 4.8 CCF monthly water usage Retail Water Rate Change Rationale
The Water Enterprise has made significant progress on seismic improvements and upgrades to its water infrastructure through the Water System Improvement Program (WSIP). With the funding provided by rate increases approved in prior years, the SFPUC seismically upgraded reservoirs, replaced pipelines, and added new, modernized facilities. The cost of WSIP investments in the regional system is shared with the SFPUC’s 27 wholesale customers. As of March 2022, approximately 99% of WSIP projects are complete, but additional capital projects are planned. These and other bond-funded capital projects are projected to increase debt service costs 14% over the next three years from $328.4 million in Fiscal Year Ending (FYE) 2023 to $373.7 million in FYE 2026. In addition, gradual increases in operating expenses are also projected to follow long term inflationary growth of 3% annually. Capital costs are significant drivers of rates; approximately 79% of every new dollar generated by the rate increase will cover water capital needs, either the payment of debt service or cash-funding of capital projects.

Historic Water Demand
As can be seen in Figure 1 below, retail water use held relatively constant following the conservation gains from 2014 -2016 drought with very little rebound. Water use has subsided again with the current drought and changes in demand characteristics due to the COVID-19 pandemic, with retail customers reducing their annual water use by 8.0% in 2023, compared to 2020. The revenues that would have been lost due to this level of conservation have been largely offset by drought surcharges that were authorized by the Commission the prior rate approval.

As of March 2023, retail customers have increased water usage by 4.1%, on a 12- month rolling basis, from their low point in 2022, but past experience and uncertainty around future water sales projections require a prudent approach to be taken in forecasting future demand.

DD 40
Proposal to Adopt Water Rates for FYE 2024 through FYE 2026 Commission Meeting Date: May 23, 2023

Page 4 ends

Projected Water Demand
SFPUC projects a slight near term rebound in future water demands as the City recovers from COVID-19. However, over the longer-term, water use is projected to decline for a variety reasons: hardened water conservation customer behavior post- drought; replacement to more efficient water fixtures; better management of leaks; sensitivity to increasing water rates (price elasticity).

The shaded areas on Figure 1 illustrate the uncertainty in projected demand given the multiple unknowns that are being accounted for in projected water demand.

While our financial plan was developed applying usage as shown in the dashed line plot, future water demands could possibly be higher or lower. If demands are higher than projected, SFPUC could implement lower rates than are recommended in this report. However, the financial plan accounts for the chance that water sales continue to decline. Our recommendations will allow the Water Enterprise to continue to meet SFPUC’s financial obligation even with lower than projected water sales.

Figure 1. Historic and Projected Retail Water Sales (MGD (Million Gallons per Day)
Independent Consultant – 2023 SFPUC Water and Wastewater Rate Study SFPUC staff has worked closely with the independent rate consultant to analyze the current revenues and revenue requirements of the Water Enterprise, conducted a detailed review of the Enterprise’s cost of service, and reviewed the current rate design. The Rate Study’s recommended changes to retail water rates are designed to:
x Provide sufficient revenues for the operations, maintenance, and repair of the enterprise, consistent with industry best practices;
x Provide sufficient revenues to improve or maintain financial condition and bond ratings at or above levels equivalent to highly-rated utilities of each enterprise;
DD 41
Proposal to Adopt Water Rates for FYE 2024 through FYE 2026 Commission Meeting Date: May 23, 2023

Page 5 ends

x Conform to all SFPUC financial policies;
x Meet requirements and covenants under all bond indentures; and x Set rates based on cost of service and in compliance with State law.

The independent consultant has determined that rate increases are necessary to fund the projected operating and capital costs of the Enterprise. Detailed information on the projected revenue requirements, cost of service analysis, and rate design can be found in the 2023 Rate Study report, which is has been provided as an attachment to this report and which is available online at sfwater.org/rates.

Water Enterprise Revenue Requirements
The 2023 Rate Study compared the forecasted revenues of the utility to its forecasted operating and capital needs. Included in this forecast are the Water Enterprise’s Commission approved FYE 2023 and FYE 2024 Budget, 10-Year Capital Plan, and 10-Year Financial Plan. This revenue requirement analysis determines if current rates are adequate to cover the projected annual operating and capital expenditures while meeting the enterprise financial obligations and SFPUC financial policies. This analysis identified that revenues under existing rates would be insufficient to fund the Enterprise’s expected financial obligations.

If rates remained the same, the Enterprise would be unable to generate sufficient revenues to pay all projected costs and to meet debt service coverage and reserve targets. Holding rates at their current level would result in a failure to meet our debt service coverage target by FYE 2026, fund balancing dropping below the 90-day operating reserve by FYE 2027, and fund balancing being completely exhausted by FYE 2028. Based on the 2023 Rate Study analysis, the SFPUC is proposing a three-year adjustment to retail water rates increasing Water Enterprise revenues by 5% in FYE 2024, 5% in FYE 2025, and 5% in FYE 2026

1. Cost of Service Analysis
The 2023 Rate Study completely updated the cost-of-service analysis for the Water Enterprise. The cost-of-service analysis serves as a rational basis for distributing the full costs of SFPUC’s services to each customer class in proportion to the demands placed on the system. The analysis includes:
x A more detailed analysis of the allocation of costs to enterprise functions x An update on demand assumptions for each customer class x Detailed breakdown of costs to support cost of service analysis x Revised system peaking assumptions based on recent customer demands x Updated allocation of costs to each customer class

1 Due to changes in cost allocations to customer classes and rate components as part of the cost-of- service analysis and rate design, bill increases will not exactly match the changes in rate revenue requirements in year one of the rate implementation. Bill increases will track with the proposed rate revenue requirements in all other years.

DD 42
Proposal to Adopt Water Rates for FYE 2024 through FYE 2026 Commission Meeting Date: May 23, 2023

Page 6 ends

Rate Design
Water rate design analysis determines how the costs are recovered from each customer through specified water rates. The focus of this process is to achieve cost recovery and substantiate that customers are paying their fair and proportionate share of system costs. This is achieved by calculating rates for each customer class based on the respective customer classes system demands and the costs allocated to that class based on the cost-of-service analysis.

Rate Structure
The SFPUC’s water rate structure consists of two components: (1) a monthly service charge based on meter sized (fixed) and (2) a commodity charge which is based on water volumetric charges derived from metered water usage (variable).

1. Fixed monthly service charges for residential and non-residential customers vary by meter size

2. Variable charge for residential customers is comprised of a two-tier, inclining block rate structure, while non-residential customers are charged a uniform commodity rate specific to their customer type
Proposed Rates
The Staff recommendation is to maintain the current water rate structure, but with updated rates that reflect the updated costs of service allocations, as shown in the attached report and resolution.

Affordability
Ratepayer affordability is a policy priority of the Commission and is a part of the Ratepayer Assurance Policy. Staff have performed analyses and developed recommendations for ways to support ratepayers who may be burdened by their utility bills. The SFPUC approved a level of service goal in 2012 to keep the average single family combined bill under 2.5% of the San Francisco median household income.

Using Census data, staff were able to identify and analyze the demographics of customers paying more than 2.5% of the median household income on water bills.

This analysis found that of the approximately 160,000 who directly pay their water bills, approximately 17,000, or 11%, are “cost-burdened” with greater than 2.5% of their household income dedicated to their utility bill. These cost-burdened households are more likely to be families and women-led households, people of color, to be linguistically isolated (having no one over the age of 14 who speaks English well or very well), to be over 65, and/or to live in the southeast part of the city.

This analysis was used to inform changes to the existing Customer Assistance Program (CAP) in April 2023. In addition, staff are currently evaluating new affordability policies that take into consideration the bill impact of low-income customers as well as households earning the median income.

DD 43
Proposal to Adopt Water Rates for FYE 2024 through FYE 2026 Commission Meeting Date: May 23, 2023

Page 7 ends

Rate Fairness Board
The proposed retail water rates have been presented to and discussed by the Rate Fairness Board(RFB)at eight public meetings over the past year,and more recently inmore than 30 community outreach meetings to neighborhood groups, chambers of commerce, and environmental associations. The RFB’spresentation on the proposed rates is also being presented at this May 23rd Commission meeting.

Public Outreach and Education
The SFPUC Communications Team has been engaged in important communication, outreach, and education on the water and wastewater rates proposal. The Team has reached out to more than 400organizations to describe SFPUC services, why rate increases are needed, and what the impact will be on their monthly bill. Between February and May of 2023 we have offered stakeholder briefings to more than 30 organizations; invited more than 400 organizations and their members to attend three virtual town hall meetings; and launched a multi-lingual public marketing campaign that includes ads in four languages to educate the public about the rates proposal, invite them to the town hall meetings, and direct them to extensive information on a dedicated rates web page. We also created a one-stop-shop web page with information about how customers can save on their bill which includes information on discount programs, grants, rebates, and incentives.In addition, the team has engaged in multiple forms of communication to reach our ratepayers through the use of bill inserts, emails, physical flyers, social media, and targeted marketing using print, digital, and broadcast outlets. Special attention has been provided to BIPOC communities and people for whom English is a second language. This includes direct emails to 92,000 customers, geo-targeted Google ads, Facebook video ads, and ads with Univision, Sing Tao, and Fil-Am Radio.

Public Notice& Rate Adoption Process
In compliance with the notice requirements of California’s Proposition 218, the SFPUC issued the attached official notices tocustomers and property owners informing them of the proposed rate changes and their right to submit a written protest against the proposed rates. The notice also informed customers and property owners that if the SFPUC receives written protest from a majority of affected property owners and customers the proposed rate increases will not take effect.

Additionally, the notice informs customers that under California Government Code section 53759, there is a 120-day statute of limitations for challenging any new, increased, or extended fee or charge.

Pursuant to Charter Section 16.112, a Notice of Public Hearing on the establishment of a schedule of rates was published in the official newspaper onApril 12, 13, 14, 16, and 19, 2023 and posted on the SFPUC website and at the San Francisco Public Library, for a public hearing on May 23, 2023, with possible Commission action on this date. If approved by the Commission, these rates would take effect July 1, 2023, unless rejected by the Board of Supervisors, as provided in Charter section 8B.125.

DD 44
Proposal to Adopt Water Rates for FYE 2024 through FYE 2026 Commission Meeting Date: May 23, 2023

Page 8 ends

Environmental
Review:

On May 8, 2023 the San Francisco Planning Department determined the Project to be statutorily exempt from environmental review under the CEQA section 21080(b)(8) and the CEQA Guidelines section 15273 (Rates, Tolls, Fares, and Charges) (Case No. 2023-004066ENV), related to the establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval of rates, tolls, fares, or other charges. The exemption determination can be found here: https://sfpuc.sharefile.com/d- scf9d27e30321428a947c1215c95166ea
This action constitutes the Approval Action for the Project for the purposes of the CEQA pursuant to San Francisco Administrative Code section 31.04(h).

Results of
Inaction:

A delay or denial in approving this agenda item will result in no water rate changes for retail customers as of July 1, 2023. Delay or denial of the proposed rates will adversely impact the SFPUC’s ability to meet projected revenue requirements for the Water Enterprise. SFPUC will be required to either defer capital projects, which will negatively impact the Enterprise’s ability to continue to provide services to our customers or return to the Commission with an updated rate proposal that will need to be larger to account for the loss of revenue from delaying the implementation of rates.

Recommendation: SFPUC staff recommends that the Commission adopt the attached resolution.

Attachments: 1. Schedule of Retail Water Rates

2. 2023 SFPUC Water and Wastewater Rate Study

3. Prop 218 Notice to Customers

4. Notices of Public Hearing

5. Protest Letters

DD 45

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
City and County of San Francisco

RESOLUTION NO.:

WHEREAS, In accordance with Section 8B.125 of the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) retained an independent rate consultant, McGovern McDonald Engineering and Raftelis Financial Consulting, that prepared the report titled 2023 SFPUC Water and Wastewater Rate Study (2023 Rate Study), which has been submitted to the Rate Fairness Board for its review and posted to the sfwater.org website; and
WHEREAS, The General Manager and staff have reviewed the 2023 Rate Study, and have prepared a staff rate proposal, which has been submitted to the Rate Fairness Board for its review and has posted to the sfwater.org website; and
WHEREAS, The Rate Fairness Board reviewed the findings and recommendations of the 2023 Rate Study and staff rate proposal and presented its own report to this Commission on May 23, 2023, finding that water revenues under existing rates will be insufficient to meet revenue requirements of the Water Enterprise; and
WHEREAS, Based on the analysis set forth in the 2023 Rate Study, the SFPUC finds that water revenues under existing rates will be insufficient to meet revenue requirements of the Water Enterprise as projected in the Water Enterprise 10-Year Financial Plan, and recommends that rate adjustments are needed resulting in revenue requirement increases of 5% in fiscal year ending 2024, 5% in fiscal year ending 2025, and 5% in fiscal year ending 2026; and WHEREAS, As required by
California Constitution, at Article XIII-D ( Proposition 218), SFPUC issued a notice of the proposed rate change to all ratepayers and property owners more than 45 days in advance of the May 23, 2023 public hearing; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to Charter Section 16.112, a Notice of hearing on the proposal to adopt a new schedule of rates was published in the official newspaper on April 12, 13, 14, 16, and 19, 2023, and posted on the SFPUC website and at the San Francisco Public Library, as required, for a public hearing on May 23, 2023; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to the published notice of the intention of the SFPUC to adopt a revised Schedule of Retail Water Rates to be charged for retail water service in San Francisco and adjacent areas, a public hearing was held on May 23, 2023, and members of the public were given an opportunity to comment on the revised Schedules of Water Rates; and WHEREAS, At the May 23, 2023 public hearing, the Commission considered protests against the proposed rates. The SFPUC received written protests against the proposed rates were presented by less than a majority of parcel owners and direct water services customer tenants; and
DD 46

WHEREAS, This Commission hereby finds that adoption of this resolution will establish rates for the purpose of: meeting operating expenses, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits; purchasing or leasing supplies, equipment, or materials; meeting financial reserve needs and requirements, obtaining funds for capital projects necessary to maintain service within existing service areas; and obtaining funds necessary to maintain such intra-city transfers as are authorized by the City’s Charter; and
WHEREAS, on May 8, 2023 the San Francisco Planning Department determined the Project to be statutorily exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) section 21080(b)(8) and the CEQA Guidelines section 15273 (Rates, Tolls, Fares, and Charges) (Case No. 2023-004066ENV), related to the establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval of rates, tolls, fares, or other charges; and WHEREAS, Under Charter Section 8B.125, the Commission must set rates and charges, subject to rejection by the Board of Supervisors within 30 days of submission; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That this Commission hereby determines, based on the findings of the 2023 Rate Study, that projected revenues under existing retail water rates, together with other revenues of the Water Enterprise, will be insufficient to meet the revenue requirements of the Water Enterprise as projected in the Water Enterprise 10-Year Financial Plan, and that overall increases of water rates by 5% in the fiscal year ending 2024, 5% in the fiscal year ending 2025, and 5% in the fiscal year ending 2026 are therefore warranted; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Commission hereby adopts the revised Schedule of Retail Water Rates, attached to this Resolution and incorporated by reference as if set forth here in full, to apply to all retail Customers, as defined in the Schedule, of San Francisco’s Water System, on or after July 1, 2023.

I hereby certify that the foregoing was adopted by the Public Utilities Commission at its meeting of May 23, 2023.
___________________________________
Secretary, Public Utilities Commission
DD 47

SCHEDULE OF RETAIL WATER RATES
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2023
(Adopted May 23, 2023 by Commission Resolution No.: XX-XXXX)

Section 1 – Authority and General Purpose
This Schedule was adopted by the Commission pursuant to Section 8B.125 of the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco for the purpose of establishing an orderly system for the imposition and collection of charges for the operating, maintenance, replacement, debt service and other costs incurred by the San Francisco Water Enterprise in gathering, treating and delivering water for consumptive and other uses in San Francisco and other areas receiving retail service from the Water Enterprise.

Section 2 – Definitions
For the purpose of this Schedule, the following definitions shall apply unless the context specifically dictates otherwise.
“City”
The City and County of San Francisco
“Commission”
The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
“Customer”
Any person, firm, corporation, partnership, trust, or any other entity including, but not limited to, local, state and federal governments utilizing the services of the City’s utility systems.
“Customer Class”
Customers with the same or similar usage characteristics are grouped into Customer Classes for purposes of cost allocation and rate setting. “Dwelling Unit”
As defined in San Francisco Planning Code Section 102.7, a room or suite of two or more rooms that is designed for, or is occupied by, one family doing its own cooking therein and having only one kitchen. For the purposes of this resolution, “Dwelling Unit” shall not include a lodging house, rooming house, motel or hotel, as defined in San Francisco Housing Code Section 410, or a live/work unit, as defined in Section 102.13 of the San Francisco Planning Code.
“Equivalent Meter”
A measure of the capacity of a meter expressed as a ratio to the capacity of a 5/8 X 3/4 meter.
“General Manager”
The General Manager of the Public Utilities Commission or his or her designee.

DD 48

“Operations and Maintenance Costs”
Expenditures used for the storage, treatment, and delivery of Retail and Regional water including, but not limited to, the costs of personnel, materials and supplies, energy and administration.
“Retail Customer”
Retail customers are all individual customers that receive direct water service from SFPUC.
“Residential Customer”
A Residential Customer is the owner or customer of record of any single-family or multiple-family Dwelling Unit.
“Water System”
The City’s water system including all properties (real, personal, and tangible or intangible) owned, operated, maintained by and under the jurisdiction of the Commission used for the gathering, impounding, treatment, transmission and distribution of water, including all future additions, extensions, replacements and improvements to the system.

Section 3 – Customer Classification
a. Class Determination
Upon application for new service, each Customer shall be assigned to a Customer Class based on the City’s evaluation of the Customer’s usage characteristics in accordance with the requirements of this resolution and applicable laws and regulations. Such Customer Class determination shall be based on the Customer’s description of its current operation and use of the water facilities of the City. Such description shall be subject to verification by the City. b. Change in Classification
Customers requiring or requesting a change in their classification shall do so in writing within 30 days of a change in operations.

Section 4 - Enterprise Funds
Pursuant to Article V, Section 5.01 of the Indenture between the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and U.S. Bank, NA, as trustee, all revenues of the Water Enterprise shall be set aside and deposited into a fund in the City treasury (the Revenue Fund). All amounts paid into the Revenue Fund shall be maintained separate and apart from other City funds. Moneys in the Revenue Fund shall be appropriated and expended in accordance with the Indenture.

Section 5 – Billing Rates for Retail Water
The following Schedules of Retail Water Rates to be paid by all retail customers of the City’s Water System are hereby adopted and imposed.

DD 49

SCHEDULE W-1A: Single Family Residential Service
Applicable to single-family dwelling units inside and outside of the City and County of San Francisco served through a separate meter or bank of meters:

First: A Monthly Service Charge based on the size of the meter.

Meter
Size
Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026
Current Rates Effective
July 1, 2023
Effective July 1,
2024
Effective July 1,
2025
5/8 in $15.17 $16.64 $17.48 $18.36
3/4 in $19.43 $21.13 $22.19 $23.30
1 in $27.95 $30.11 $31.62 $33.21
1-1/2 in $49.25 $52.56 $55.19 $57.95
2 in $74.81 $79.51 $83.49 $87.67
3 in $142.97 $151.35 $158.92 $166.87
4 in $219.65 $232.18 $243.79 $255.98
6 in $432.65 $456.70 $479.54 $503.52
8 in $688.25 $726.13 $762.44 $800.57
10 in $1,071.65 $1,130.26 $1,186.78 $1,246.12
12 in $1,838.45 $1,938.54 $2,035.47 $2,137.25
16 in $3,201.65 $3,375.47 $3,544.25 $3,721.47
Second: A charge for all water delivered based on monthly meter reading.

Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026
Current Rates Effective
July 1, 2023
Effective July 1,
2024
Effective July
1, 2025
First 4 CCF per month $9.60 $10.33 $10.85 $11.40
All additional CCF $10.71 $11.47 $12.05 $12.66
DD 50

SCHEDULE W-1B: Multi-Family Residential Service
Applicable to multi-family accounts within and outside of the City and County of San Francisco consisting of two or more dwelling units served through a separate meter or bank of meters:

First: A Monthly Service Charge based on the size of the meter.

Meter
Size
Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2023 FYE 2024
Current Rates Effective
July 1, 2023
Effective July 1,
2024
Effective July 1,
2025
5/8 in $15.17 $16.64 $17.48 $18.36
3/4 in $19.43 $21.13 $22.19 $23.30
1 in $27.95 $30.11 $31.62 $33.21
1-1/2 in $49.25 $52.56 $55.19 $57.95
2 in $74.81 $79.51 $83.49 $87.67
3 in $142.97 $151.35 $158.92 $166.87
4 in $219.65 $232.18 $243.79 $255.98
6 in $432.65 $456.70 $479.54 $503.52
8 in $688.25 $726.13 $762.44 $800.57
10 in $1,071.65 $1,130.26 $1,186.78 $1,246.12
12 in $1,838.45 $1,938.54 $2,035.47 $2,137.25
16 in $3,201.65 $3,375.47 $3,544.25 $3,721.47
Second: A charge for all water delivered based on monthly meter reading.

Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026
Current Rates Effective
July 1, 2023
Effective July 1,
2024
Effective July 1,
2025
First 3 CCF per month $9.60 $10.19 $10.70 $11.24
All additional CCF $10.76 $10.94 $11.49 $12.07
DD 51

SCHEDULE W-1C: Commercial, Industrial, Public, and General Uses Applicable to commercial, industrial, public buildings, parks, docks & ships, and other general uses within and outside of the City and County of San Francisco, excluding Wholesale customers, served through a separate meter or bank of meters:

For Street Sprinkling and Flushing when quantities are computed from records of tank wagons and billed as one amount: Schedule W-1C (no service charge to apply) First: A Monthly Service Charge based on the size of the meter.

Meter
Size
Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026
Current Rates Effective
July 1, 2023
Effective July 1,
2024
Effective July 1,
2025
5/8 in $15.17 $16.64 $17.48 $18.36
3/4 in $19.43 $21.13 $22.19 $23.30
1 in $27.95 $30.11 $31.62 $33.21
1-1/2 in $49.25 $52.56 $55.19 $57.95
2 in $74.81 $79.51 $83.49 $87.67
3 in $142.97 $151.35 $158.92 $166.87
4 in $219.65 $232.18 $243.79 $255.98
6 in $432.65 $456.70 $479.54 $503.52
8 in $688.25 $726.13 $762.44 $800.57
10 in $1,071.65 $1,130.26 $1,186.78 $1,246.12
12 in $1,838.45 $1,938.54 $2,035.47 $2,137.25
16 in $3,201.65 $3,375.47 $3,544.25 $3,721.47
Second: A charge for all water delivered based on monthly meter reading.

Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026
Current Rates Effective
July 1, 2023 Effective July 1, 2024 Effective July 1, 2025 For all units of
water $10.55 $11.12 $11.68 $12.27
For Municipal Street Sprinkling and Flushing when quantities are computed from records of tank wagons and billed as one amount: Schedule W-1C (no service charge to apply) DD 52

SCHEDULE W-2: Fire Service
Applicable to private fire service within and outside of the City and County of San Francisco installed and maintained according to the rules, regulations and Specifications of the San Francisco Water Enterprise.

First: A Monthly Service Charge based on the size of the service.

Meter
Size
Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026
Current Rates Effective
July 1, 2023
Effective
July 1, 2024
Effective
July 1, 2025
1 in $9.55 $8.43 $8.86 $9.31
1-1/2 in $12.45 $8.91 $9.36 $9.83
2 in $15.93 $9.73 $10.22 $10.74
3 in $25.21 $12.70 $13.34 $14.01
4 in $35.65 $17.82 $18.72 $19.66
6 in $64.65 $36.19 $38.00 $39.90
8 in $99.45 $67.88 $71.28 $74.85
10 in $151.65 $115.55 $121.33 $127.40
12 in $256.05 $181.62 $190.71 $200.25
Second: If water is used for any purpose other than extinguishing accidental fires, the W-1C rates for water delivery shall apply.

SCHEDULE W-4: Docks and Shipping Supply within the City and County of San Francisco.

Applicable to special shipping service, including hose truck and other special services, from open docks through common hydrants where delivery is not through a service and meter for which the customer is responsible:

First: A Docks & Shipping Connection Charge: Schedule W-44 Second: A charge for all water delivered based on monthly meter reading: Schedule W-1C DD 53

SCHEDULE W-5: Hydrant Use for Temporary Water Supply
Applicable to temporary metered service connections through fire hydrants within the City and County of San Francisco:

First: A Builders and Contractors Connection Charge: Schedule W-44 Second: A Meter Rental Deposit: Schedule W-44
Third: A Monthly Service Charge based on the size of the meter:

Meter
Size
Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2023
Current Rates Effective
July 1, 2023
Effective
July 1, 2024
Effective
July 1, 2025
5/8 in $15.17 $16.64 $17.48 $18.36
3/4 in $19.43 $21.13 $22.19 $23.30
1 in $27.95 $30.11 $31.62 $33.21
1-1/2 in $49.25 $52.56 $55.19 $57.95
2 in $74.81 $79.51 $83.49 $87.67
3 in $142.97 $151.35 $158.92 $166.87
4 in $219.65 $232.18 $243.79 $255.98
6 in $432.65 $456.70 $479.54 $503.52
8 in $688.25 $726.13 $762.44 $800.57
10 in $1,071.65 $1,130.26 $1,186.78 $1,246.12
12 in $1,838.45 $1,938.54 $2,035.47 $2,137.25
16 in $3,201.65 $3,375.47 $3,544.25 $3,721.47
Fourth: A charge for all water delivered based on monthly meter reading: Schedule W-1C Fifth: Any customer who fails to report water consumption as required shall be assessed a non- reporting penalty equivalent to the cost of 25 units of water per month at the current W-1C volumetric rate.

DD 54

SCHEDULE W-24: Untreated Water Service
Applicable inside and outside the City and County of San Francisco for untreated water service when the customer furnishes all facilities necessary to convey the untreated water from the San Francisco Water Enterprise's water supply reservoirs to the customer’s point of use.

First: A Monthly Service Charge based on the size of the meter.

Meter
Size
Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2023
Current Rates Effective
July 1, 2023
Effective
July 1, 2024
Effective
July 1, 2025
5/8 in $15.17 $16.64 $17.48 $18.36
3/4 in $19.43 $21.13 $22.19 $23.30
1 in $27.95 $30.11 $31.62 $33.21
1-1/2 in $49.25 $52.56 $55.19 $57.95
2 in $74.81 $79.51 $83.49 $87.67
3 in $142.97 $151.35 $158.92 $166.87
4 in $219.65 $232.18 $243.79 $255.98
6 in $432.65 $456.70 $479.54 $503.52
8 in $688.25 $726.13 $762.44 $800.57
10 in $1,071.65 $1,130.26 $1,186.78 $1,246.12
12 in $1,838.45 $1,938.54 $2,035.47 $2,137.25
16 in $3,201.65 $3,375.47 $3,544.25 $3,721.47
Second: A charge for all water delivered based on monthly meter reading.

Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026
Current Rates Effective
July 1, 2023
Effective
July 1, 2024
Effective
July 1, 2025
For all units of water $0.95 $1.80 $1.89 $1.99
DD 55

Section 6 - Drought Surcharge
If the Commission, at a publicly noticed meeting, adopts a resolution declaring a stage of water delivery reduction in accordance with the Retail Water Shortage Allocation Plan (i.e., Stage 1, Stage 2 or Stage 3), the following schedule of drought surcharges shall be applied to retail water rates as of the date of the Commission resolution or any effective date designated by the Commission. For residential customers, the surcharges shall be based on the assumption that the overall demand reduction is split evenly between Tier 1 and Tier 2. Each nonresidential customer shall incur the percent drought surcharge uniformly. The overall required surcharge is based on the final formula: surcharge ($ per ccf) = Water Revenue Shortfall from reduced flow/ Reduced Water Flow.

The drought surcharges shall remain in effect until the Commission, at a publicly noticed meeting, adopts a resolution rescinding the water delivery reduction.

Section 7 – Effective Date
The rates for FYE 2024 set forth herein shall be effective for water meter readings made on or after July 1, 2023 or as soon thereafter as possible. The rates for FYE 2025 shall be effective for water meter readings made on or after July 1, 2024. The rates for FYE 2026 shall be effective for water meter readings made on or after July 1, 2025, and shall remain in effect until repealed, modified or superseded.

DD 56
Proposed Water and Sewer Rates for Fiscal Years Ending 2024-2026 Every day, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) generates clean energy, delivers high-quality water to 2.7 million Bay Area customers, and protects the environment and public health by treating wastewater and stormwater for San Francisco residents and businesses. Our work is almost exclusively funded by the rates that customers pay. Our systems work 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. :e are a not-for-proÀt public utility whose rates reÁect the true cost of operating, maintaining, and upgrading our water and sewer systems. To continue delivering the services that San Franciscans depend on, the SFPUC is proposing water and sewer rate increases, effective July 1, 2023.

Your Dollars at Work
Water and sewer systems are critical to public health. The SFPUC is committed to providing customers with safe, reliable, and affordable drinking water and a combined sewer system that reduces Áooding and protects the environment from pollution. These systems require ongoing maintenance and upgrades. Many parts of the SFPUC water system are nearly 100 years old, and the oldest parts of the sewer system date back to the Gold Rush. We need to continue to maintain and upgrade aging systems to prevent breaks, meet regulatory requirements, improve seismic safety, and adapt to storms as the climate changes. Your dollars pay for essential services and projects that protect public health.

Our Public Rate Setting Process
The SFPUC is committed to a transparent public rate setting process guided by the principles set forth in our
Ratepayer Assurance Policy. As required by the San Francisco Charter, an independent rate consultant has completed a cost-of-service study. The rate study Àndings provide the basis for our rate proposal, which goes through an extensive public approval process. That process includes the Rate Fairness Board, comprising SFPUC customers and other appointees. The Rate Fairness Board holds public meetings and provides recommendations to ensure affordability, stability, and fairness.

Interested customers and other parties can provide comments on the proposed rates at the Rate Fairness Board and Commission hearings. To learn more about our rates package, rate setting process, and upcoming meetings, visit sfpuc.org/2023Rates.

Proposed Rates Schedule
The SFPUC is proposing to update the sewer rate structure and to update water and sewer rates effective July 1, 2023. The SFPUC’s combined sewer system treats both wastewater and stormwater runoff. The new rate structure would split the sewer portion of bills into two parts: a wastewater component and a stormwater component. This new structure would not change the total amount of revenue collected by the SFPUC, but it would more scientiÀcally and equitably allocate the existing costs of managing wastewater to ratepayers. This new structure would be gradually phased in over seven years.

The proposed new rate schedule represents an average monthly bill increase of $12.69 each year for the average single-family residential household in San Francisco (about 8.3% per year).

The following sections describe these bill components for residential and non-residential customers.

Our website has examples of an average single-family monthly bill, as well as a bill calculator where you can develop personalized bill estimates. Visit sfpuc.org/2023Rates for the bill calculator and other useful information.

Bills contain two core elements: Àxed charges that cover shared costs relevant to all customers and volumetric rates based on the amount of water used or wastewater produced.

Monthly Fixed Charges
Service charges are the same every month, regardless of water consumption.

Water service charges vary by meter size. Water service charges recover Àxed costs, like customer service and billing, maintenance of water meters, and facilities used to provide water for Àre protection that beneÀts all SFPUC customers.

Sewer service charges are the same for all sewer customers. Sewer service charges recover a portion of Àxed costs associated with customer service and billing, which are the same for all SFPUC customers.

Stormwater service charges would be assessed on a three-tiered structure for residential customers, based on the total assessor’s parcel size, with smaller parcels being charged a lower rate that gradually increases for larger parcels. Non-residential, mixed-use, and large residential parcels (over 6,000 square feet or with more than six dwelling units) would be charged based on their total permeable and impermeable surface area. Permeable surfaces, like planters and lawns, can absorb water except in large storms. Impermeable surfaces, like driveways and roofs, direct more water to — and impose more costs on — the sewer system. Stormwater charges recover the cost of stormwater-speciÀc infrastructure and the stormwater portion of the combined system.

Fire sprinkler service charges are for properties with Àre sprinklers or standpipes. These charges are calculated to recover costs for customer service, billing, and maintenance speciÀc to private Àre meters.

Volumetric Rates: Residential Customers
Residential water rates are billed based on metered water usage and have two tiers. For single-family properties, the Àrst four units of water per month are billed the Àrst-tier rate, and any additional units are billed the second-tier rate. For multi-family residential properties, the Àrst three units of water per dwelling unit per month are billed the Àrst-tier rate, while any additional units of water are billed the second-tier rate. The second tier is a higher unit rate to reÁect the additional costs needed to reliably serve high-volume users 24/7.

Residential wastewater rates are billed based on the estimated volume of water that returns to the sewer system. The default volume for single-family residences is 90% of water usage; the default for multi-family residences is 95% of water usage. All discharge units of wastewater are billed at the same rate.

Your Rates Pay For:
• 24/7 Operations
• Routine Maintenance and
Emergency Repairs
• Infrastructure Improvements
• Conveyance and Treatment
• Environmental Monitoring
•W a t e r s h e d a n d
Land Management
•C o m m u n i t y P r o g r a m s
For further information, visit sfpuc.org/2023Rates.

Reference your most recent bill to obtain your meter
size and water use (per month).

Volumetric Water Rates (1 unit of water = 1 Ccf = 748 gallons) Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026
Single-Family Residential - Water per unit
First 4 units per month
(Tier 1) $9.60 $10.33 $10.85 $11.40
All additional units (Tier 2) $10.71 $11.47 $12.05 $12.66 Multi-Family Residential - Water per unit
First 3 units per dwelling
unit per month (Tier 1) $9.60 $10.19 $10.70 $11.24
All additional units (Tier 2) $10.76 $10.94 $11.49 $12.07 Non-Residential - Water per unit
For all units of water $10.55 $11.12 $11.68 $12.27
Untreated Water Service
For all units of water $0.95 $1.80 $1.89 $1.99
Proposed Fire Service Rates (Per Service)
Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026
Monthly Private Fire Service Charge
1 in. $9.55 $8.43 $8.86 $9.31
1-1/2 in. $12.45 $8.91 $9.36 $9.83
2 in. $15.93 $9.73 $10.22 $10.74
3 in. $25.21 $12.70 $13.34 $14.01
4 in. $35.65 $17.82 $18.72 $19.66
6 in. $64.65 $36.19 $38.00 $39.90
8 in. $99.45 $67.88 $71.28 $74.85
10 in. $151.65 $115.55 $121.33 $127.40
12 in. $256.05 $181.62 $190.71 $200.25
Proposed Water Rates
Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026
Monthly Service Charge - Water (based on meter size)
5/8 in. $15.17 $16.64 $17.48 $18.36
3/4 in. $19.43 $21.13 $22.19 $23.30
1 in. $27.95 $30.11 $31.62 $33.21
1-1/2 in. $49.25 $52.56 $55.19 $57.95
2 in. $74.81 $79.51 $83.49 $87.67
3 in. $142.97 $151.35 $158.92 $166.87
4 in. $219.65 $232.18 $243.79 $255.98
6 in. $432.65 $456.70 $479.54 $503.52
8 in. $688.25 $726.13 $762.44 $800.57
10 in. $1,071.65 $1,130.26 $1,186.78 $1,246.12
12 in. $1,838.45 $1,938.54 $2,035.47 $2,137.25
16 in. $3,201.65 $3,375.47 $3,544.25 $3,721.47
Proposed Stormwater Runoff Charge Rates
Monthly per
Assessor Parcel
Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026
Residential (6,000 sq. ft. and under/six dwelling units and under) Tier 1: 0-1,700 sq. ft. N/A $2.31 $5.04 $8.24
Tier 2: 1,701-3,300 sq. ft. N/A $3.60 $7.84 $12.82
Tier 3: 3,301-6,000 sq. ft. N/A $5.41 $11.79 $19.27
Non-Residential (All other customers)
$/1000 sq. ft. Permeable N/A $0.19 $0.41 $0.67
$/1000 sq. ft. Impermeable N/A $1.89 $4.11 $6.72
Proposed Wastewater Rates (1 unit of water = 1 Ccf = 748 gallons) Current Proposed
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026
Monthly Service
Charge Wastewater $5.21 $4.85 $5.28 $5.76
Residential - Wastewater per unit discharged
For all discharge units $15.97 $16.91 $17.80 $18.72
Non-Residential - Wastewater per unit discharged
Volume per
discharge unit $9.46 $9.74 $10.09 $10.43
Chemical Oxygen
Demand per lb. $0.647 $0.861 $0.925 $0.994
Total Suspended
Solids per lb. $1.647 $1.681 $1.808 $1.944
Oil and Grease per lb. $1.661 $1.053 $1.142 $1.239
DD 57
Periodically the SFPUC undertakes rate studies to ensure the rates customers are charged reÁect the true cost of providing our services. Adjustments are then proposed to ensure all customers are treated fairly, uninterrupted services are provided, strict environmental regulations can be met, and the Ànancial stability of our assets and systems are maintained long-term.

PRESORTED

SECOND-CLASS MAIL
U.S. POSTAGE PAID

SAN FRANCISCO, CA
PERMIT NO. 4
525 Golden Gate Avenue, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
And Important Information Regarding Water and Sewer Rates Proposed for Fiscal Years Ending 2024-2026.

You have 120 days to challenge rate changes. Get more info at:
sfpuc.org/2023Rates or (415) 554-3289.

AVISO DE AUDIENCIA PÚBLICA
E información importante sobre las tarifas de agua y alcantarillado propuestas para los años Àscales que terminan 2024-2026. Tiene 120 dtas para DesaÀar los cambios de tarifas.

Obtenga más información en: sfpuc.org/2023Rateso (415) 554-3289.

ABISO NG PAMPUBLIKONG PAGDINIG
At Mahalagang Impormasyon Tungkol sa Mga Rate ng Tubig at Imburnal na Iminungkahing Para sa Mga Taon ng Piskal na Magtatapos sa 2024-2026. Mayroon kang 120 araw upang hamunin ang mga pagbabago sa rate. Kumuha ng higit pang impormasyon sa:
sfpuc.org/2023Rates o (415) 554-3289.
ᡒ။௨஌
昘2024-2026߄ۓ120ङ㩌族⚵巡
ͫ寶Ї侸͹sfpuc.org/2023Rates۪415) 554-3289澞
Volumetric Rates: Non-Residential Customers
Non-residential water rates are billed based on metered water usage. There are no tiers for non-residential customers.

Non-residential wastewater rates vary based on the volume of pollutants present in the discharge of various customer types. As a result, the rates shown in the table have four parts: a volumetric charge based on 90% of the customer’s billed water consumption and three strength charges based on the concentration of pollutants in a customer’s wastewater discharge. The concentrations are based on the type of business operated at the service address. Visit our website at sfpuc.org/2023Rates to look up the pounds of pollutants per unit of wastewater for your business type.

Temporary Drought Surcharge
A drought surcharge is a temporary charge that is levied only when the SFPUC Commission puts the SFPUC Water Shortage Contingency Plan into effect, requesting that customers reduce water usage. When implemented, the drought surcharge increases the volumetric water and wastewater rates for all customer types up to the percentages shown in the table on the right. These percentages are calculated to recover costs based on reduced billed volumes.

As an example, if the Commission declares a Stage 1 drought, asking customers to reduce water consumption by 5%, the SFPUC will analyze the forecasted reduced billed volumes and set a water and wastewater drought surcharge of up to 5%. For water, this 5% temporary surcharge would be applied to both tier rates for residential water customers and to the volumetric rate per unit for non-residential customers. For sewer, this surcharge would be applied to the volumetric rate per unit of wastewater discharge for residential and non-residential customers, as well as the rate per pound of pollutants for non- residential customers.

The SFPUC may set the percentage surcharge lower than shown on the table below to ensure that rates do not exceed the costs of providing water and wastewater services to customers.

Ways to Save
The SFPUC offers a variety of rebates, programs,
and incentives to help customers lower their bill.

Learn more at sfpuc.org/2023Rates or call
(415) 551-3000.

Water Shortage
Contingency Plan Stage
Target Water
Usage Reduction
Drought Surcharge on Volumetric
Water & Wastewater Rates
Stages 1 - 3 5% Up to 5%
Stage 4 5-18% Up to 18%
Stage 5 - 6 18-32% Up to 32%
S.F. Public Utilities Commission Meeting
Revised Hearing Date: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 at 1:30 p.m.

San Francisco City Hall, Room 400
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
This is the second notice regarding these proposed water and sewer rates.

The meeting date for the rate hearing has been rescheduled to May 23, 2023, at 1:30 pm. No other changes have been made to the proposed rates.

In accordance with Article XIII D, Section 6, of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218), you have the right to submit a written protest against the proposed water and sewer rates. The proposed rate increases will not take effect if the SFPUC receives written protests from a majority of the affected property owners and customers.

Written protests must be mailed to the SFPUC Commission Secretary at the address below or hand delivered to the Commission Secretary at the May 23, 2023 Commission public hearing in order to be counted.

Protests may not be delivered electronically or verbally. Any written protest must: (1) state that the identiÀed property owner or customer is in opposition to the proposed rates increase; (2) provide the location of the identiÀed parcel (by assessor’s parcel number, street address, or customer account); and (3) include the name and signature of the person submitting the protest.

Although oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as a formal protest unless accompanied by a written protest, the SFPUC welcomes input from the community during the public hearing on the proposed water and sewer rates. Only one protest may be registered per property.

Mail Protests to:

SFPUC Commission Secretary
525 Golden Gate Avenue, 13th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
We value your input.

If you have questions or would like more information, please visit sfpuc.org/2023Rates or email [email protected].

Under California Government Code section 53759, there is a 120-day statute of limitations for challenging any new, increased, o r extended fee or charge. This statute of limitations applies to the water and sewer service rates and charges proposed in this n otice.

It also applies to future changes to water and sewer rates and charges.

Revised Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Water and Sewer Rates Prsrt Std
U.S. Postage PAID
San Francisco CA
Permit No. 925
DD 58
In accordance with Article XIII D, Section 6, of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218), you have the right to submit a written protest against the proposed water and sewer rates. The proposed rate increases will not take effect if the SFPUC receives written protests from a majority of the affected property owners and customers.

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TUESDAY, May 23, 2023 - 1:30 P.M.

City Hall, Room 400
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 – 1:30 PM City Hall, Room 400, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, San Francisco, CA 94102, at a Regular Meeting of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission:

Public Hearing, discussion, and possible action to adopt the proposed water and sewer rates and charges for customers of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. The resolutions to be presented at the hearing are (1) Proposal to Adopt Retail Water Rates for FYE 2024 through FYE 2026; and (2) Proposal to Adopt Sewer Rates for FYE 2024 through FYE 2026. If approved, the new rates and charges would take effect July 1, 2023.

Copies of the agenda item and related files will be available 72 hours in advance of the May 23, 2023 meeting on the Commission’s website: https://sfpuc.org/about-us/boards- commissions-committees/sfpuc-commission/agendas-minutes-resolutions-log Posted: April 10, 2023
DD 59
/0/1/2/3/i255/3/5/6/7/8/i255/9/10/11/i255/9/2/12/2/13/14/i255/3/15/6/16/5/i255/10/13/12/17/i255 /i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/18/19/20/21/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255
/i255
/i255
/22/i255/i255/24/i255/i255/25/i255/i255/26/i255/i255/27/i255/i255/28/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/29/i255/i255/22/i255/i255/30/i255/i255/26/i255/i255/31/i255/i255/32/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/24/i255/i255/28/i255/i255/33/i255/i255/22/i255/i255/24/i255/i255/31/i255/i255/28/i255/i255/24/i255 /i255
/34/i255/35/36/37/38/39/i255/40/41/42/40/i255/34/i255
/i255
/44/45/45/i255/46/47/i255/35/6/13/15/6/i255/48/13/6/i255/49/12/50/51/47/52/i255/35/53/2/15/8/i255/42/45/54/52/i255/35/6/13/15/6/i255/48/13/6/52/i255/38/6/12/2/9/10/11/13/2/6/i255/41/42/55/45/40/56/57/54/57/42/i255 /0/8/12/8/5/1/10/13/8/i255/i255/58/55/40/57/59/i255/54/57/60/56/42/45/42/55/i255/61/i255/62/6/63/i255/i255/58/55/40/57/59/i255/54/57/42/56/44/64/57/40/i255 /i255 /i255
/i255
/65/66/67/67/68/i255/67/68/i255/65/70/71/72/73/74/75/76/73/67/77/i255 /i255
/58/42/45/40/54/47/54/i255/38/47/38/47/78/47/59/i255
/i255
/35/15/6/15/8/i255/10/9/i255/38/6/12/2/9/10/11/13/2/6/i255/i255 /i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/59/i255 /38/10/53/13/15/17/i255/10/9/i255/18/11/6/13/14/8/i255/i255 /i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/59/i255/3/3/i255 /37/10/15/2/7/8/i255/0/17/5/8/21/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255 /48/51/i255/80/8/3/7/11/2/5/15/2/10/13/21/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255 /36/i255/6/16/i255/6/i255/7/2/15/2/81/8/13/i255/10/9/i255/15/1/8/i255/82/13/2/15/8/51/i255/35/15/6/15/8/3/i255/6/13/51/i255/6/i255/11/8/3/2/51/8/13/15/i255/10/9/i255/15/1/8/i255/35/15/6/15/8/i255/10/9/i255/38/6/12/2/9/10/11/13/2/6/83/i255/36/i255/6/16/i255 /10/50/8/11/i255/15/1/8/i255/6/14/8/i255/10/9/i255/8/2/14/1/15/8/8/13/i255/17/8/6/11/3/52/i255/6/13/51/i255/13/10/15/i255/6/i255/5/6/11/15/17/i255/15/10/i255/10/11/i255/2/13/15/8/11/8/3/15/8/51/i255/2/13/i255/15/1/8/i255/6/84/10/50/8/i255 /8/13/15/2/15/12/8/51/i255/16/6/15/15/8/11/47/i255/i255/36/i255/6/16/i255/15/1/8/i255/5/11/2/13/7/2/5/6/12/i255/7/12/8/11/85/i255/10/9/i255/15/1/8/i255/5/11/2/13/15/8/11/i255/6/13/51/i255/5/53/84/12/2/3/1/8/11/i255/10/9/i255/15/1/8/i255 /18/19/48/37/86/39/i255/38/18/82/37/0/87/i255/19/39/78/18/19/0/39/19/52/i255/6/i255/13/8/88/3/5/6/5/8/11/i255/5/53/84/12/2/3/1/8/51/i255/2/13/i255/15/1/8/i255/39/13/14/12/2/3/1/i255 /12/6/13/14/53/6/14/8/i255/2/13/i255/15/1/8/i255/38/2/15/17/i255/10/9/i255/35/6/13/15/6/i255/48/13/6/52/i255/6/13/51/i255/6/51/89/53/51/14/8/51/i255/6/i255/13/8/88/3/5/6/5/8/11/i255/10/9/i255/14/8/13/8/11/6/12/i255 /7/2/11/7/53/12/6/15/2/10/13/i255/6/3/i255/51/8/9/2/13/8/51/i255/84/17/i255/15/1/8/i255/12/6/88/3/i255/10/9/i255/15/1/8/i255/35/15/6/15/8/i255/10/9/i255/38/6/12/2/9/10/11/13/2/6/i255/84/17/i255/15/1/8/i255/35/53/5/8/11/2/10/11/i255 /38/10/53/11/15/i255/10/9/i255/15/1/8/i255/38/10/53/13/15/17/i255/10/9/i255/18/11/6/13/14/8/52/i255/35/15/6/15/8/i255/10/9/i255/38/6/12/2/9/10/11/13/2/6/52/i255/53/13/51/8/11/i255/51/6/15/8/i255/10/9/i255/90/53/13/8/i255/42/52/i255/40/41/42/42/52/i255 /38/6/3/8/i255/37/10/47/i255/40/60/52/57/42/40/47/i255/i255/0/1/6/15/i255/15/1/8/i255/13/10/15/2/7/8/52/i255/10/9/i255/88/1/2/7/1/i255/15/1/8/i255/6/13/13/8/63/8/51/i255/2/3/i255/6/i255/5/11/2/13/15/8/51/i255/7/10/5/17/52/i255/1/6/3/i255 /84/8/8/13/i255/5/53/84/12/2/3/1/8/51/i255/2/13/i255/8/6/7/1/i255/11/8/14/53/12/6/11/i255/6/13/51/i255/8/13/15/2/11/8/i255/2/3/3/53/8/i255/10/9/i255/3/6/2/51/i255/13/8/88/3/5/6/5/8/11/i255/6/13/51/i255/13/10/15/i255/2/13/i255 /6/13/17/i255/3/53/5/5/12/8/16/8/13/15/i255/15/1/8/11/8/10/9/i255/10/13/i255/15/1/8/i255/9/10/12/12/10/88/2/13/14/i255/51/6/15/8/3/52/i255/15/10/56/88/2/15/21/i255 /i255
/39/63/8/7/53/15/8/51/i255/10/13/21/i255/40/45/61/40/45/61/42/45/45/57/i255 /48/15/i255/91/10/3/i255/48/13/14/8/12/8/3/52/i255/38/6/12/2/9/10/11/13/2/6/i255 /36/i255/7/8/11/15/2/9/17/i255/58/10/11/i255/51/8/7/12/6/11/8/59/i255/53/13/51/8/11/i255/5/8/13/6/12/15/17/i255/10/9/i255/5/8/11/89/53/11/17/i255/15/1/6/15/i255/15/1/8/i255/9/10/11/8/14/10/2/13/14/i255/2/3/i255/15/11/53/8/i255/6/13/51/i255 /7/10/11/11/8/7/15/47/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255
/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255
/35/2/14/13/6/15/53/11/8/i255
/i255
/92/93/94/i255/96/97/93/94/98/99/92/98/100/i255/101/102/93/103/99/94/101/97 /104/105/106/i255/108/109/110/111/112/113/i255/114/113/115/i255/114/109/116/i255/117/110/109/116/118/119/114/118/120/115/i255/118/109/i255/121/122/123/124/105 /125/122/123/106/126/i255/105/123/122/127/123/104/105/106/125 /106/123/124/126/i255/128/122/105/127/122/123/128/104 /112/129/108/105/130/104/121/104/121/122
/131/120/116/116/109/i255/132/120/120/131/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255 /114/117/i255/133/134/118/135/118/120/108/108/119/114/114/119/120/116/i255/114/112/118/110/112/113/109/110/136 /106/137/106/i255/138/120/139/131/112/116/i255/138/109/113/112/i255/109/140/112/i255/123/105/113/132/i255/117/139/120/120/110 /114/109/116/i255/117/110/109/116/118/119/114/118/120/115/i255/118/109/i255/127/i255/121/122/123/124/137 /132/110/138/i255/127/i255/116/120/113/119/118/112/i255/120/117/i255/132/112/109/110/119/116/138 /116/120/113/119/118/112/i255/120/117/i255/133/134/141/139/119/118/i255/132/112/109/110/119/116/138/i255/113/134/112/114/131/109/136/115/i255/108/142/143/i255/137/105/115/i255/137/124/137/105/i255/127/i255/123/144/105/124/i255/133/145/108/145 /119/i255/142/146/i255/142/i255/147/148/149/148/150/151/152/i255/153/154/i255/149/155/151/i255/134/152/148/149/151/156/i255/114/149/142/149/151/157/i255/142/152/156/i255/142/i255/158/151/157/148/156/151/152/149/i255/153/154/i255/149/155/151/i255/114/149/142/149/151/i255/153/154/i255/118/142/159/148/154/153/158/152/148/142/160/i255/119/i255/142/146 /153/161/151/158/i255/149/155/151/i255/142/162/151/i255/153/154/i255/151/148/162/155/149/151/151/152/i255/143/151/142/158/157/115/i255/142/152/156/i255/152/153/149/i255/142/i255/163/142/158/149/143/i255/149/153/i255/153/158/i255/148/152/149/151/158/151/157/149/151/156/i255/148/152/i255/149/155/151/i255/142/164/153/161/151 /151/152/149/148/149/159/151/156/i255/146/142/149/149/151/158/145/i255/119/i255/142/146/i255/149/155/151/i255/163/158/148/152/147/148/163/142/159/i255/147/159/151/158/165/i255/153/154/i255/149/155/151/i255/163/158/148/152/149/151/158/i255/142/152/156/i255/163/166/164/159/148/157/155/151/158/i255/153/154/i255/149/155/151/i255/114/109/116 /117/110/109/116/118/119/114/118/120/i255/112/129/109/108/119/116/112/110/115/i255/142/i255/152/151/167/157/163/142/163/151/158/i255/163/166/164/159/148/157/155/151/156/i255/148/152/i255/149/155/151/i255/112/152/162/159/148/157/155/i255/159/142/152/162/166/142/162/151/i255/148/152 /149/155/151/i255/147/148/149/143/i255/153/154/i255/114/109/116/i255/117/110/109/116/118/119/114/118/120/115/i255/147/153/166/152/149/143/i255/153/154/i255/114/109/116/i255/117/110/109/116/118/119/114/118/120/115/i255/142/152/156/i255/142/156/168/166/156/162/151/156/i255/142 /152/151/167/157/163/142/163/151/158/i255/153/154/i255/162/151/152/151/158/142/159/i255/147/148/158/147/166/159/142/149/148/153/152/i255/142/157/i255/156/151/154/148/152/151/156/i255/164/143/i255/149/155/151/i255/159/142/167/157/i255/153/154/i255/149/155/151/i255/114/149/142/149/151/i255/153/154 /118/142/159/148/154/153/158/152/148/142/i255/164/143/i255/149/155/151/i255/114/166/163/151/158/148/153/158/i255/118/153/166/158/149/i255/153/154/i255/149/155/151/i255/118/153/166/152/149/143/i255/153/154/i255/114/109/116/i255/117/110/109/116/118/119/114/118/120/115/i255/114/149/142/149/151/i255/153/154 /118/142/159/148/154/153/158/152/148/142/115/i255/166/152/156/151/158/i255/156/142/149/151/i255/123/124/135/123/104/135/123/121/106/123/115/i255/118/142/157/151/i255/116/153/145/i255/122/123/124/130/130/128/145/i255/i255/113/155/142/149/i255/149/155/151/i255/152/153/149/148/147/151/115/i255/153/154/i255/167/155/148/147/155 /149/155/151/i255/142/152/152/151/169/151/156/i255/148/157/i255/142/i255/163/158/148/152/149/151/156/i255/147/153/163/143/115/i255/155/142/157/i255/164/151/151/152/i255/163/166/164/159/148/157/155/151/156/i255/148/152/i255/151/142/147/155/i255/158/151/162/166/159/142/158/i255/142/152/156/i255/151/152/149/148/158/151 /148/157/157/166/151/i255/153/154/i255/157/142/148/156/i255/152/151/167/157/163/142/163/151/158/i255/142/152/156/i255/152/153/149/i255/148/152/i255/142/152/143/i255/157/166/163/163/159/151/146/151/152/149/i255/149/155/151/158/151/153/154/i255/153/152/i255/149/155/151/i255/154/153/159/159/153/167/148/152/162 /156/142/149/151/157/115/i255/149/153/127/167/148/149/144 /124/122/135/123/137/135/137/124/137/105/115/i255/124/122/135/123/105/135/137/124/137/105/115/i255/124/122/135/123/122/135/137/124/137/105/115/i255/124/122/135/123/130/135/137/124/137/105/115/i255/124/122/135/123/121/135/137/124/137/105 /124/122/135/123/121/135/137/124/137/105
/114/109/116/i255/117/110/109/116/118/119/114/118/120/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255 /170/171/172/172/172/172/172/173/174/175/176/177/178/172/170 /112/146/142/148/159
/179/180/181/182/183/184/180 /185/186/187/188/189/182/183 /190/184/191/192/182/179/193
/181/187/184/194/195/191/196/197/198/199/200/201/202/197/201/203/201/202/204 /205/206/202/203/186/207/198/207
/183/208/209/200/190/199/210/210/197/192/211/211/212/213/203/203 /205/195/214/207/183/199/214/210/209/211/215/188/207/193/211/211/216/210/217/209/209 /186/210/199/218/217
/194/199/215/185/214/199/215/218/208/219/218/211/197/183/191/220/213/205/203/201 /221/222/223/224/225/226/222 /227/228/229/230/231/224/225 /232/226/233/234/224/221/235/236/223/237/238/239/240/241/242/243/244 /241/242 /245/246/243/245/247/245/246/248/249/236/246/247/228/244/225/250/251/242 /232/241/252/252/243/234/253/253/254/255/247/247/243/249/0/1/2 /225/241/1/252/251/253/3 /230/2/235/253/253/240/252/238/251/251/228/252/241/4/238/243 /5/241/3/227/1/241/3/4/250/239/4/253/243/225/233/6/255/249/247/245/243/241/251 /241/234/238/7/237/252/241/1 /244/238/238/251/250/3/7 /253/8/251/9/238 /5/241/3/227/1/241/3/4/250/239/4/253/228/237/10/252/250/4/229/251/250/252/250/251/250/238/239 /225/253/254/254/250/239/239/250/253/3/2
/228/237/10/252/250/4 /232/238/241/1/250/3/7/243/240/250/239/4/237/239/239/250/253/3/243 /241/3/240/11/253/239/239/250/10/252/238/241/4/251/250/253/3/251/253/241/240/253/11/251 /251/9/238/11/1/253/11/253/239/238/240/12/241/251/238/1 /241/3/240 /239/238/12/238/1/1/241/251/238/239/241/3/240/4/9/241/1/7/238/239/8/253/1 /4/237/239/251/253/254/238/1/239/253/8 /251/9/238/5/241/3 /227/1/241/3/4/250/239/4/253/228/237/10/252/250/4 /229/251/250/252/250/251/250/238/239 /225/253/254/254/250/239/239/250/253/3/2/223/9/238/1/238/239/253/252/237/251/250/253/3/239 /251/253/10/238/11/1/238/239/238/3/251/238/240/241/251/251/9/238 /9/238/241/1/250/3/7 /241/1/238/13/249/14/228/1/253/11/253/239/241/252/251/253 /233/240/253/11/251/234/238/251/241/250/252/15/241/251/238/1/234/241/251/238/239/8/253/1 /227/16/226/245/247/245/255/251/9/1/253/237/7/9 /227/16/226 /245/247/245/17/18/241/3/240/13/245/14/228/1/253/11/253/239/241/252/251/253 /233/240/253/11/251/5/238/12/238/1/234/241/251/238/239/8/253/1/227/16/226 /245/247/245/255/251/9/1/253/237/7/9 /227/16/226/245/247/245/17/2/224/8 /241/11/11/1/253/19/238/240/243/251/9/238/3/238/12/1/241/251/238/239/241/3/240 /4/9/241/1/7/238/239/12/253/237/252/240/251/241/20/238/238/8/8/238/4/251 /21/237/252/242/249/243/245/247/245/246/2
/225/253/11/250/238/239/253/8/251/9/238/241/7/238/3/240/241/250/251/238/254 /241/3/240/1/238/252/241/251/238/240/8/250/252/238/239/12/250/252/252/10/238 /241/19/241/250/252/241/10/252/238 /22/245 /9/253/237/1/239/250/3 /241/240/19/241/3/4/238/253/8/251/9/238/244/241/242/245/246/243/245/247/245/246 /254/238/238/251/250/3/7 /253/3 /251/9/238/225/253/254/254/250/239/23 /239/250/253/3/24/239 /12/238/10/239/250/251/238/236
/9/251/251/11/239/236/25/25/239/8/11/237/4/2/253/1/7/25/241/10/253/237/251/23 /237/239/25/10/253/241/1/240/239/23/4/253/254/254/250/239/239/250/253/3/239/23 /4/253/254/254/250/251/251/238/238/239/25/239/8/11/237/4/23 /4/253/254/254/250/239/239/250/253/3/25/241/7/238/3/240/241/239/23 /254/250/3/237/251/238/239/23/1/238/239/253/252/237/251/250/253/3/239/23/252/253/7 /184/26/198/204/202/27/28/220/28/220/213/29
DD 60

y,//dϴ

DD 61
$JHQF\ 6)38&
0RGHO :DWHU)LQDQFLDO3ODQ &RVWRI6HUYLFH5DWH0RGHO
%XGJHW<
7HVW<HD
&RORU.H\LQWKH0RGHO
,QSXW&HOOV9DOXH&RQILUPHG
,QSXW&HOOV&RQILUPDWLRQ1HHGHG
&DOFXODWHG9DOXHRU7H[W/DEHO
(UURU&K
H 758( )$/6(
5DIWHOLV3URMHFW7HDP
6WHYH*DJQRQ3URMHFW0DQDJHU
&KDUOHV'LDPRQG/HDG$QDO\VW
(1'2):25.6+((7
7RJJOHZLWK'URSGRZQ0HQ
^ĂŶ &ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽ WƵďůŝĐ hƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ͗
tĂƚĞƌ &ŝŶĂŶĐŝĂů WůĂŶ Θ ŽƐƚ ŽĨ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ ZĂƚĞ DŽĚĞů
DD 62
^ĂŶ &ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽ WƵďůŝĐ hƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ͗
tĂƚĞƌ &ŝŶĂŶĐŝĂů WůĂŶ Θ ŽƐƚ ŽĨ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ ZĂƚĞ
3URSRVHG5HWDLO:DWHU5DWH6FKHGXOH )<( )<( )<( )<( )<( )<( 3URSRVHG5HYHQXH$GMXVWPHQWV 1$
Schedules W-1A, W-1B, W-1C, W-3A, W-4, W-5, W-21, W-24, W-31, & W-33 )L[HG0RQWKO\6HUYLFH&KDUJH

E\0HWHU6L]H
&XUUHQW
3URSRVHG
)<(
3URSRVHG
)<(
3URSRVHG
)<(
3URSRVHG
)<(
3URSRVHG
)<(
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
Schedules W-2 & W-22
)LUH6HUYLFH)L[HG0RQWKO\6HUYLFH&KDUJH

E\&RQQHFWLRQ6L]H
&XUUHQW
3URSRVHG
)<(
3URSRVHG
)<(
3URSRVHG
)<(
3URSRVHG
)<(
3URSRVHG
)<(
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
LQFK
9ROXPHWULF5DWH

SHU&&)
&XUUHQW
3URSRVHG
)<(
3URSRVHG
)<(
3URSRVHG
)<(
3URSRVHG
)<(
3URSRVHG
)<(
6LQJOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO(Schedules W-1A & W-21)
)LUVW8QLWVSHU0RQWK
$OO$GGLWLRQDO8QLWV
0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO(Schedule W-1B)
)LUVW8QLWVSHU'ZHOOLQJ8QLWSHU0RQWK
$OO$GGLWLRQDO8QLWV
DD 63

y,//dϵ

DD 64

CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Before completing this form please read the instructions on the back. Untimely claims will be returned. Please submit this form and supporting documentation to the Controller’s Office, Claims Division, 1390 Market Street, 7th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 in person or by mail.
* = REQUIRED ** = REQUIRED IF KNOWN_____________

1. Claimant’s Name and Home Address (Please Print Clearly) * Rose Aquilina and a Claimant Class _________
1239 Hollister Avenue ____________________
city San Francisco______ state CA zip 94124
Telephone Daytime Even,ng Cellular

2. Send Official Notices and Correspondence to:
* Donald Driscoll
P.O. Box 6596~
city Albany S t a t e CA Zip 94706
Tnlpnhnnp Day,ime Even,ng
leiephone (5-10)527.4500
Cellular

3. Date of Birth 4. Social Security Number 5. Date of Incident * 6. Time of Incident (A M o rP M )
**

7. Location of Incident or Accident 8. Claimant Vehicle License Plate #, Type, Mileage, and Year **

9. Basis of Claim. State in detail all facts and circumstances of the incident. Identify all persons, entities, property and Ci ty departments involved. State why you believe the City is responsible for the alleged injury, property damage or loss. * Unlawful water rates that improperly charge for public fire service. See attached letter.

Name, I.D. Number and City Department
of City Employee who allegedly caused injury or loss Type of City Vehicle Vehicle License Number and Bus or Train Number Newsha Ajami & Others. See letter. **
Amount of Claimants property damage or loss and
method of computation. Attach supporting
documentation. (See Instructions)

10. Description of Claimant’s injury, property damage or loss * Water charges in excess of the cost of service.

ITEMS
* $
$
$
$
TOTAL AMOUNT $
Court Jurisdiction: Limited (up to $25,000) □
Unlimited (over $25,000) B

12. Witnesses (if any) Name

1. Address Telephone

2. 13.
* 08/08/2023

CRIMINAL PENALTY FOR PRESENTING A FALSE OR
FRAUDULENT CLAIM IS IMPRISONMENT OR FINE OR BOTH.
(PENAL CODE §72)
Signature of C taimant or Representative ///p ate
//attorney
Print Name
Donald Driscoll Relationship to
Claimant
Do Not Write In This Space
CA/FORM 02/14
DD 65

A COMPLETED CLAIM FORM AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION MUST BE FILED WITH THE CONTROLLER’S OFFICE, CLAIMS DIVISION, 1390 MARKET STREET, 7TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-5402

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A CLAIM
Failure to complete all sections of the Claim form will delay the processing of your claim and result in the return or denial of your claim.

1. Claimant’s Name, Address and Telephone-State the full name, mailing address, and telephone numbers of the person claiming personal injury, damage or loss.

2. Official Notices and Correspondence-Provide the name, mailing address, and telephone numbers of the person to whom all official notices and other correspondence should be sent, if other than claimant. This official contact person can be the claimant or a representative of the claimant, if this section is completed, all official notices and correspondence will be sent to the person listed.

3. Date of Birth-State claimant’s date of birth including month, day, and year.

4. Social Security Number-State the claimant’s social security number. The Federal Government requires the City to report settlements for present or future medical care. This information will be kept confidential and only shared with the Federal Government. The City is unable to process payment without this information.

5. Date of Incident-State the exact month, day, and year of the incident giving rise to the claim.

6. Time of Incident-State the exact time, including A.M. or P.M., of the incident giving rise to the claim.

7. Location of Incident of Accident-lnclude the city and exact street address or intersection where the incident occurred.

8. Claimant Vehicle License Plate Number-Please provide license plate number of vehicle driven by claimant or in which claimant was a passenger.

9. Basis of Claim-State in detail all facts supporting your claim, including all facts and circumstances of the incident, all alleged injuries, property damage and loss, all persons, entities, property and City departments involved, and why you believe the City is responsible for the alleged injury, property damage or loss. In the appropriate boxes, provide the name, I.D. number and City department of the City employee(s) who allegedly caused the injury or property damage, the type of City vehicle involved (if any), and the license and number of the City vehicle involved (if any). For accidents involving a bus or light rail vehicle, please provide the line and vehicle number.

10. Description of Injury, Property Damage or Loss-Provide in full detail a description of the injury, property damage or loss that allegedly resulted from the incident. If claimant’s vehicle was involved, provide the make, model, mileage, and year. You may attach additional material.

11. Amount of Loss and Method of Computation-State the total amount of money you claim in damages. Provide a breakdown of each item of damages and how that amount was computed. You may include future, anticipated expenses or losses. Please attach copies of all bills, receipts and repair estimates. If the claim involves property damage, please provide two repair estimates. The Government Code provides that if the claim is for less than $10,000, the claimant must state the total amount claimed and the basis of this computation. If the claim exceeds $10,000, no dollar amount need be provided, but the claimant must indicate the applicable court jurisdiction. Limited civil jurisdiction cases are those involvin g damages under $25,000; unlimited civil jurisdiction cases are those involving damages of $25,000 or more.

12. Witnesses-State the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of any persons who witnessed the incident. Attach list of additional names if necessary.

13. Signature of Claimant or Representative-Please sign and date. Print name of signatory and relationship to claimant.

The claim must be signed by the claimant or by the official representative of the claimant.

Claims for death or injury to persons or damage to personal property must be filed within six months after the incident giving rise to the claim. All other claims must be filed within one year.

Personal service of claims can be accomplished during regular business hours, Monday through Friday (excluding County holidays). If you want a time stamped copy of your claim returned to you, please present an original and copy of the claim, and include a self-addressed stamped envelope.

For information on the status of your claim, please call the applicable number listed below:
554-3900
554-3900
554-3900
554-3900 PUC SEWER
(650) 821-5073 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
554-3833 DEPT. OF BLDG. INSPECTION

WATER DEPARTMENT

MUNICIPAL RAILWAY

OTHER DEPARTMENTS
554-3900
554-3900
554-3900

PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO
S.F. INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
CONTROLLER’S CLAIM DIVISION
We Do Not Accept claims for the following agencies:

HOUSING AUTHORITY 1815 Egbert Avenue, S.F., CA 94124
SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 555 Franklin Street, 2nd Fl, S.F., CA, 94102 SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 50 Phelan Avenue, S.F., CA 94112 (415) 715-3280
(415) 241-6000
(415) 239-3556

1. 2.

3. Please be advised that the City and County of San Francisco may offset against a claim any amounts owed by the claimant, includ ing unpaid hospital bills, unpaid parking and traffic tickets and welfare reimbursements or overpayments.

DD 66

CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Before completing this form please read the instructions on the back. Untimely claims will be returned. Please submit this form and supporting documentation to the Controller’s Office, Claims Division, 1390 Market Street, 7 th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 in person or by mail.
* = REQUIRED ** = REQUIRED IF KNOWN_____________

1. Claimant’s Name and Home Address (Please Print Clearly) *Ted Loewenberg and a Claimant Class______
1562-1564 Waller Street

2. Send O fficial Notices and Correspondence to:
* Donald Driscoll
PO Box 6596
city San Francisco
Telephone Day,ime
______S ta te CA Zip 94117
Evening Cellular
city Albany________
Telephone 527.4500
Evening
State C A Zip 9 4 7 0 6
Cellular

3. Date of Birth 4. Social Security Number 5. Date of Incident *

6. Time of Incident (A M o rP M )

7. Location of Incident or Accident 8. Claimant Vehicle License Plate #, Type, Mileage, and Year **

9. Basis of Claim. State in detail all facts and circumstances of the incident. Identify all persons, entities, property and Ci ty departments involved. State why you believe the City is responsible for the alleged injury, property damage or loss. * Unlawful water rates that improperly charge for public fire service. See attached letter.

10. Description of Claimant’s injury, property damage or loss Name, I.D. Number and City Department
of City Employee who allegedly caused injury or loss
Type of City Vehicle Vehicle License Number and Bus or Train Number **
Newsha Ajami & Others. See letter.
**

11. * Water charges in excess of the cost of service.

Amount of Claimant’s property damage or loss and
method of computation. Attach supporting
documentation. (See Instructions)
ITEMS

TOTAL AMOUNT

$
$
$
$
$
Court Jurisdiction: Limited (up to $25,000) □
Unlimited (over $25,000) ■

12. Witnesses (if any) Name Address

1. Telephone

2. 13.
* 08/08/2023
Do Not Write In This Space
Signaturex)€Claimant or, Representative Date
Az j t y attorney
Print Name . Relationship to
Donald Driscoll claimant

CRIMINAL PENALTY FOR PRESENTING A FALSE OR
FRAUDULENT CLAIM IS IMPRISONMENT OR FINE OR BOTH.
(PENAL CODE §72) CA/FORM 02/14
DD 67

A COMPLETED CLAIM FORM AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION MUST BE FILED WITH THE CONTROLLER’S OFFICE, CLAIMS DIVISION, 1390 MARKET STREET, 7TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-5402

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A CLAIM
Failure to complete all sections of the Claim form will delay the processing of your claim and result in the return or denial of your claim.

1. Claimant’s Name, Address and Telephone-State the full name, mailing address, and telephone numbers of the person claiming personal injury, damage or loss.

2. Official Notices and Correspondence-Provide the name, mailing address, and telephone numbers of the person to whom all official notices and other correspondence should be sent, if other than claimant. This official contact person can be the claimant or a representative of the claimant. If this section is completed, all official notices and correspondence will be sent to the person listed.

3. Date of Birth-State claimant’s date of birth including month, day, and year.

4. Social Security Number-State the claimant’s social security number. The Federal Government requires the City to report settlements for present or future medical care. This information will be kept confidential and only shared with the Federal Government. The City is unable to process payment without this information.

5. Date of Incident-State the exact month, day, and year of the incident giving rise to the claim.

6. Time of Incident-State the exact time, including A.M. or P.M., of the incident giving rise to the claim.

7. Location of Incident of Accident-lnclude the city and exact street address or intersection where the incident occurred.

8. Claimant Vehicle License Plate Number-Please provide license plate number of vehicle driven by claimant or in which claimant was a passenger.

9. Basis of Claim-State in detail all facts supporting your claim, including all facts and circumstances of the incident, all alleged injuries, property damage and loss, all persons, entities, property and City departments involved, and why you believe the City is responsible for the alleged injury, property damage or loss. In the appropriate boxes, provide the name, I.D. number and City department of the City employee(s) who allegedly caused the injury or property damage, the type of City vehicle involved (if any), and the license and number of the City vehicle involved (if any). For accidents involving a bus or light rail vehicle, please provide the line and vehicle number.

10. Description of Injury, Property Damage or Loss-Provide in full detail a description of the injury, property damage or loss that allegedly resulted from the incident. If claimant’s vehicle was involved, provide the make, model, mileage, and year. You may attach additional material.

11. Amount of Loss and Method of Computation-State the total amount of money you claim in damages. Provide a breakdown of each item of damages and how that amount was computed. You may include future, anticipated expenses or losses. Please attach copies of all bills, receipts and repair estimates. If the claim involves property damage, please provide two repair estimates. The Government Code provides that if the claim is for less than $10,000, the claimant must state the total amount claimed and the basis of this computation. If the claim exceeds $10,000, no dollar amount need be provided, but the claimant must indicate the applicable court jurisdiction. Limited civil jurisdiction cases are those involvin g damages under $25,000; unlimited civil jurisdiction cases are those involving damages of $25,000 or more.

12. Witnesses-State the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of any persons who witnessed the incident. Attach list of additional names if necessary.

13. Signature of Claimant or Representative-Please sign and date. Print name of signatory and relationship to claimant.

The claim must be signed by the claimant or by the official representative of the claimant.

Claims for death or injury to persons or damage to personal property must be filed within six months after the incident giving rise to the claim. All other claims must be filed within one year.

Personal service of claims can be accomplished during regular business hours, Monday through Friday (excluding County holidays). If you want a time stamped copy of your claim returned to you, please present an original and copy of the claim, and include a self-addressed stamped envelope.

For information on the status of your claim, please call the applicable number listed below:

WATER DEPARTMENT

MUNICIPAL RAILWAY

OTHER DEPARTMENTS
554-3900 PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO
554-3900 S.F. INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
554-3900 CONTROLLER’S CLAIM DIVISION
554-3900 PUC SEWER 554-3900
(650) 821-5073 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 554-3900
554-3833 DEPT. OF BLDG. INSPECTION 554-3900
We Do Not Accept claims for the following agencies:

1. HOUSING AUTHORITY 1815 Egbert Avenue, S.F., CA 94124 (415)715-3280

2. SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 555 Franklin Street, 2nd Fl, S.F., CA, 94102 (415)241-6000

3. SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 50 Phelan Avenue, S.F., CA 94112 (415)239-3556 Please be advised that the City and County of San Francisco may offset against a claim any amounts owed by the claimant, includ ing unpaid hospital bills, unpaid parking and traffic tickets and welfare reimbursements or overpayments.

DD 68

CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Before completing this form please read the instruct ions on the back. Untimely claims will be returned. Please submit this form and supporting documentation to the Controller’s Office, Claims Division, 1390 Market Street, 7th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 in person or by mail.
* = REQUIRED ** = REQUIRED IF KNOWN

1. Claimant’s Name and Home Address (Please Print Clearly) * Mark Roh and a Claimant Class ____________
1108 Rhode Island Street

2. Send Official Notices and Correspondence to:
* Donald Driscoll __________________
PO Box 6596
city San Francisco
Telephone Day,ime
_______ State C A Zip 9 4 1 0 2
Evening Cellular
city Albany
Telephone Day,,me
_______ State C A Zip 9 4 7 0 6
Evening Cellular

3. Date of Birth 4. Social Security Number 5. Date of Incident *

6. Time of Incident ( A M o r P M )

7. Location of Incident or Accident
**

8. Claimant Vehicle License Plate #, Type, Mileage, and Year **

9. Basis of Claim. State in detail all facts and circumstances of the incident. Identify all persons, entities, property and City departments involved. State why you believe the City is responsible for the alleged injury, property damage or loss. * Unlawful water rates that improperly charge for public fire service. See attached letter.

10. Description of Claimant’s injury, property damage or loss Name, I.D. Number and City Department
of City Employee who allegedly caused injury or loss
Type of City Vehicle Vehicle License Number and Bus or Train Number **
Newsha Ajami & Others. See letter.
** **
* Water charges in excess of the cost of service.

11. Amount of Claimant’s property damage or loss and
method of computation. Attach supporting
documentation. (See Instructions)
ITEMS
Court Jurisdiction: Limited (up to $25,000) □
Unlimited (over $25,000) M
DD 69

A COMPLETED CLAIM FORM AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION MUST BE FILED WITH THE CONTROLLER’S OFFICE, CLAIMS DIVISION, 1390 MARKET STREET, 7TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-5402

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A CLAIM
Failure to complete all sections of the Claim form will delay the processing of your claim and result in the return or denial of your claim.

1. Claimant’s Name, Address and Telephone-State the full name, mailing address, and telephone numbers of the person claiming personal injury, damage or loss.

2. Official Notices and Correspondence-Provide the name, mailing address, and telephone numbers of the person to whom all official notices and other correspondence should be sent, if other than claimant. This official contact person can be the claimant or a representative of the claimant. If this section is completed, all official notices and correspondence will be sent to the person listed.

3. Date of Birth-State claimant’s date of birth including month, day, and year.

4. Social Security Number-State the claimant’s social security number. The Federal Government requires the City to report settlements for present or future medical care. This information will be kept confidential and only shared with the Federal Government. The City is unable to process payment without this information.

5. Date of Incident-State the exact month, day, and year of the incident giving rise to the claim.

6. Time of Incident-State the exact time, including A.M. or P.M., of the incident giving rise to the claim.

7. Location of Incident of Accident-lnclude the city and exact street address or intersection where the incident occurred.

8. Claimant Vehicle License Plate Number-Please provide license plate number of vehicle driven by claimant or in which claimant was a passenger.

9. Basis of Claim-State in detail all facts supporting your claim, including all facts and circumstances of the incident, all alleged injuries, property damage and loss, all persons, entities, property and City departments involved, and why you believe the City is responsible for the alleged injury, property damage or loss. In the appropriate boxes, provide the name, I.D. number and City department of the City employee(s) who allegedly caused the injury or property damage, the type of City vehicle involved (if any), and the license and number of the City vehicle involved (if any). For accidents involving a bus or light rail vehicle, please provide the line and vehicle number.

10. Description of Injury, Property Damage or Loss-Provide in full detail a description of the injury, property damage or loss that allegedly resulted from the incident. If claimant’s vehicle was involved, provide the make, model, mileage, and year. You may attach additional material.

11. Amount of Loss and Method of Computation-State the total amount of money you claim in damages. Provide a breakdown of each item of damages and how that amount was computed. You may include future, anticipated expenses or losses. Please attach copies of all bills, receipts and repair estimates. If the claim involves property damage, please provide two repair estimates. The Government Code provides that if the claim is for less than $10,000, the claimant must state the total amount claimed and the basis of this computation. If the claim exceeds $10,000, no dollar amount need be provided, but the claimant must indicate the applicable court jurisdiction. Limited civil jurisdiction cases are those involvin g damages under $25,000; unlimited civil jurisdiction cases are those involving damages of $25,000 or more.

12. Witnesses-State the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of any persons who witnessed the incident. Attach list of additional names if necessary.

13. Signature of Claimant or Representative-Please sign and date. Print name of signatory and relationship to claimant.

The claim must be signed by the claimant or by the official representative of the claimant Claims for death or injury to persons or damage to personal property must be filed within six months after the incident giving rise to the claim. All other claims must be filed within one year.

Personal service of claims can be accomplished during regular business hours, Monday through Friday (excluding County holidays). If you want a time stamped copy of your claim returned to you, please present an original and copy of the claim, and include a self-addressed stamped envelope.

For information on the status of your claim, please call the applicable number listed below.

WATER DEPARTMENT 554-3900
MUNICIPAL RAILWAY 554-3900
OTHER DEPARTMENTS 554-3900

PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO
S.F. INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

CONTROLLER'S CLAIM DIVISION
554-3900 PUC SEWER 554-3900
(650)821-5073 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS 554-3900
554-3833 DEPT. OF BLDG. INSPECTION 554-3900
We Do Not Accept claims for the following agencies:

1. HOUSING AUTHORITY 1815 Egbert Avenue, S.F., CA 94124 (415)715-3280

2. SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 555 Franklin Street, 2nd Fl, S.F., CA, 94102 (415)241-6000

3. SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 50 Phelan Avenue, S.F., CA 94112 (415) 239-3556 Please be advised that the City and County of San Francisco may offset against a claim any amounts owed by the claimant, includ ing unpaid hospital bills, unpaid parking and traffic tickets and welfare reimbursements or overpayments.

DD 70
Driscoll & Omens
P.O. Box 6596
Albany, CA 94706
(510) 527-4500
August 8, 2023
By hand delivery:

Controller’s Office, Claims Division
1390 Market Street, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
[email protected]
By regular mail:

City of San Francisco Board of Supervisors SFPUC Commission 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244 San Francisco Public Utilities Commission San Francisco, CA 94102-4689 525 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
To Whom It May Concern:

This claim is presented pursuant to Government Code section 910, et seq. (a) The name and post office address of the claimants.

This claim is made on behalf of Rose A quilina, 1239 Hollister A venue, San Francisco, CA 94124, Mark Roh 1108 Rhode Island Street, San Francisco, CA 94102, and Ted Loewenberg, 1562-1564 Waller Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 (Claimants). It is also made on behalf of a class (Claimant Class) consisting of ratepayers of the City and County o f San Francisco and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (collectively, SFPUC).

Specifically, the Claimant Class consists o f those ratepayers who obtain or will obtain water service from SFPUC if that service is provided at either the rates for service to a single-family residence or the rates charged to a multi-family residence. The post office addresses o f the class members are those set forth on SFPUC’s bills.
(b) The post office address where the person presenting the claim desires notices to be sent.

Donald P. Driscoll
Adryane R. Omens
Driscoll & Omens
P.O. Box 6596
Albany, CA 94706
(c) The date, place and other circumstances of the occurrence or transaction which gave rise to the claim asserted.

DD 71
Driscoll & Omens Page 2
At all times after June 30, 2023, at each location SFPUC set rates, at each location SFPUC delivered water to Claimants or someone in the Claimant Class, at each location SFPUC charged rates in excess of those permitted by the law, and at each location SFPUC submitted bills or demanded payment, and at each location where a Claimant or a member of the Claimant Class paid SFPUC.
(d) A general description of the indebtedness, obligation, injury, damage or loss incurred so far as it may be known at the time of presentation of the claim.

This claim involves rates and charges imposed on water service to single-family and multi-family residences. Those rates and charges exceeded, exceed, and will continue to exceed the cost of service because they improperly include costs associated with public fire service.

A. Public Fire Service
The City of San Francisco provides water for public firefighting through two systems.

One of these systems is the same low pressure water system that provides water to ratepayers.

The other system is the San Francisco Fire Department (Fire Department) High Pressure System, initiated in the wake of the devasting fires following San Francisco’s 1906 earthquake.

The Fire Department High Pressure System includes reservoirs, high pressure conduits, high pressure fire hydrants, and includes pumps that utilize unfiltered salt water from San Francisco Bay. The Fire Department High Pressure System does not provide water to the low pressure water system. It is not intended to and does not provide water to SFPUC ratepayers for their use and does not connect to the property of Claimants and the Claimant Class. Instead, the system delivers water solely to its high pressure fire hydrants. The high pressure fire hydrants are only used by the Fire Department for multialarm fires and only for fires within 1,000 feet of a high pressure hydrant. Those hydrants are located primarily in what the system’s designers called the “value district” consisting, roughly, of what is now the financial district and SoMa. The “value district” intentionally largely excludes Chinatown. The Fire Department High Pressure System was never expanded to some 15 neighborhoods in the southern and western parts of San Francisco and continues to underserve Chinatown.

B. Charges in Excess of the Cost of Service
SFPUC rates and charges to Claimants and the Claimant Class exceed the cost of service including, without limitation, for each of the following reasons:

1. Costs of the Fire Department High Pressure System are included in rates of Claimants and the Claimant Class although they are not part of the cost of service to Claimants and the Claimant Class.

2. Public fire protection costs of the low pressure system are included in rates of Claimants and the Claimant Class although they are not part of the cost of service to Claimants and the Claimant Class.

3. Neither the Fire Department High Pressure System water nor low pressure public fire service are used by and immediately available to Claimants and the Claimant Class.

DD 72
Driscoll & Omens Page 3

4. Low pressure public fire service is not provided to Claimants and the Claimant Class. It is only available to the Fire Department.

5. The Fire Department High Pressure System is never available to Claimants and the Claimant Class. The Fire Department High Pressure System is not available to the Fire Department if a Claimant has a fire. The same is true with respect to almost all members of the Claimant Class.

6. The Fire Department High Pressure System is subject to geographic limitations that make it unavailable to the property of Claimants and most members of the Claimant Class.

7. The Fire Department High Pressure System is used only in the context of exceptionally large fires. This would generally preclude its use for the benefit of Claimants or the Claimant Class even without the geographic limits of the system.

8. Neither Claimants nor the Claimant Class have ever needed the Fire Department High Pressure System nor have Claimants or the Claimant Class had water delivered to their property by that system.

9. Water service to the residential property of Claimants and the Claimant Class is entirely separate from the Fire Department High Pressure System which has its own reservoirs, pipes, and pumps. Fire Department High Pressure System costs are included in rates of Claimants and the Claimant Class although they are not part of the cost of service to Claimants and the Claimant Class.

10. SFPUC understates the costs of the Fire Department High Pressure System leading to excessive rates and charges for other elements of the rates and charges of Claimants and the Claimant Class.

11. SFPUC understates the costs of low pressure fire protection leading to excessive rates and charges for other elements of the rates and charges of Claimants and the Claimant Class.

12. SFPUC allocates costs of the Fire Department High Pressure System to residential customers without considering the geographical areas served by the system.

13. SFPUC allocates costs of the Fire Department High Pressure System to residential customers without considering that the Fire Department High Pressure System is used by the Fire Department only for multi-alarm fires and, generally, only for fires that occur in businesses.

14. SFPUC rates and charges include a “Water Service Charge” as well as consumption charges. Water Service Charges are recurring charges to existing SFPUC customers based on the ongoing provision to the existing customers of a connection to the low pressure water system without regard to the amount of water provided. Without any rational basis, SFPUC treats all costs associated with the Fire Department High Pressure System and all charges associated with public low pressure public fire service as a component of their Water Service Charge.

DD 73
Driscoll & Omens Page 4

15. Costs associated with the Fire Department High Pressure System and low pressure public fire service do not result from th e ongoing connections of Claimants and the Claimant Class to the low pressure system.

16. SFPUC assigns Fire Department High Pressure System and public low pressure fire service costs to rates and charges of residential ratepayers without reference to the percentage of that system’s costs reasonably attributable to residential properties. For instance, SFPUC consultant’s report, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission 2018 Water and Wastewater Cost o f Service Study, relied on by SFPUC in setting rates, assigns 52 percent of public fire protection costs to residential property ratepayers. This allocation does not correctly account for the disproportionate costs attributable to commercial and industrial fires. It also do es not correctly account for the geographic availability of the Fire Department High Pressure System, nor does it correctly recognize that fire protection costs do not result from the water connections of Claimants and the Claimant Class. To comply with California law, SFPUC rates have to do more than merely balance total costs of service with total revenues. SFPUC must correlate rates and charges for its user classes and tiered prices with the actual cost of providing water to classes of users. Both the SFPUC subsidies for the Fire Department High Pressure System and the component of rates for public fire service violate this requirement.

17. The main cost and fundamental purpose of the Fire Department High Pressure System is as a standby system, possibly providing water for the Fire Department in the event of an earthquake or other catastrophe ign iting fires in the financial district and SoMa.

Consistent with this purpose and prior to the great recession, the costs of the Fire Department High Pressure System were not treated as a cost of water service. Faced with a budget shortfall in 2010, the City a nd County of San Franci sco, without legal basis, ceased paying costs for the system and assigned them to SFPUC ratepayers.

SFPUC arbitrarily assigned much of those costs to Claimants and the Claimant Class.

18. The rates and charges for potential use of fire services are for services that have never been provided to either Claimants or the overwhelming majority of the Claimant Class.

19. Public fire service is not an existing service and is not connected to the property of any Claimant or the Claimant Class. Neither the Fire Department High Pressure System nor low pressure public fire service are property related services. Neither system provides any service to the property of Claimants or the Claimant Class. Instead, in the discretion of the Fire Department, the systems assist the Fire Department by providing water transported to fires through temporary conduits consisting of fire engines and fire hoses.

20. The costs of public fire service that SFPUC rates and charges incorporate are standby fees for potential, future fire protection services by the Fire Department. The provision of services to the Fire Department is separate from the water service SFPUC provides to Claimants and the Claimant Class.

21. Rates and charges incorporating costs of p ublic fire service are for general governmental fire services available to the public at large in substantially the same manner as it is to property owners.

DD 74
Driscoll & Omens Page 5

22. Neither the rates and charges imposed for the Fire Department High Pressure System nor the rates and charges imposed for public low pressure fire protection are “imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which [do] not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege.”

23. Neither the rates and charges imposed for the Fire Department High Pressure System nor the rates and charges imposed for public low pressure fire protection arc “imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which [do] not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the service or product.**

24. Neither the rates and charges imposed for the Fire Department High Pressure System nor the rates and charges for public low pressure fire protection are “Assessments and property-related fees imposed in accordance with the provisions of [California Constitution] Article XIII D.”
(e) The name or names of the public employee or employees causing the injury, damage, or loss, if known.

The loss resulted from the adoption of unlawful and unconstitutional rates by SFPUC and its provision of water services to Claimants and the Claimant Class at unlawful and unconstitutional rates. San Francisco Public Utilities Commissioners who have played a role in setting rates include Newsha Ajami, Tim Paulson, and Kate II. Stacy.

SFPUC is obligated to refund to Claimants and the Claimant Class all amounts in excess of the charges permitted by law or, to the extent that those am ounts have not been paid, to relinquish any claim to further payment.
(f) The am ount claimed if it totals less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) as of the date of presentation of the claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or loss, insofar as it may be known at the time of the presentation of the claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed. If the amount claimed exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000), no dollar amount shall be included in the claim. However, it shall indicate whether the claim would be a limited civil case.

No dollar amount is included in the claim because it exceeds ten thousand dollars. The claim would not be a limited civil case. In addition to monetary relief. Claimants and the Claimant Class will seek mandamus, injunctive, and declaratory relief.

Signed on Behalf of Claimants and the Claimant Class,
Donald P. Driscoll
DD 75

y,//dϭϬ

DD 76
available adjective
avail·able ԥ-ޖv6-lԥ-bԥla
Synonyms of available
1 : present or ready for immediate use
available resources
2a : ACCESSIBLE, OBTAINABLE
b : free and able to do something at a particular time
c : not involved in a romantic relationship
articles available in any drugstore
should be available to meet next Tuesday
interested in meeting available men/women
3 : qualified or willing to do something or to assume a responsibility available candidates
4 : present in such chemical or physical form as to be usable (as by a plant) available nitrogen
available water
5 law : VALID used of a legal plea or charge
6 archaic : having a beneficial effect
aaaaa
vvvv
a
a
aaaaa
iii
ll
aaaa
bbbbb
ll
eee
nnn
eeee
ssss
ss noun
aaaa
vvvvv
a
a
aaa
ii
ll
aaa
bbb
l
yyy ԥ-ޖv6-lԥ-blHa adverb
a
d
j
d
e
c
t
i
v
e
avail·
able
ԥ
-
ޖ
v
6 -l
ԥ
-b
ԥ
l
a
d
j
d
e
c
t
i
v
e
Definition Synonyms Example Sentences Word History Phrases Containing EntrDictionary Thesaurus available
DD 77
EXHIBIT 11

DD 78

PUMP OPERATIONS

SAN FRANCISCO FIRE DEPARTMENT
DD 79
DD 80
SECTION 2. Fire Pumps
15) Left Ready Line
251 ±f 1 D i < ; c h a r n A G a t e
26) #2 Discharge Gate
401 Rolipf 1/alva
401 Rolipf 1/alva Drain
42) Air Chuck Control
7) #1 Discharae Pressure
201 f l i ittet with hleeder
9) #3 Discharge
5)Compound Gauc;
8) #2 Discharge
1 (Motor
10) #4 Discharge
441 Aux inlet with bleeder
45)Aux. Inlet Gate
43) Navarro Valve
ischarge Pressure
Ready Line Pressure
6) Master Pressure
12) #6 Discharae Pressure
13) Monitor Discharge Pressure
Radio Microphone
21) Front Bumper
Prnmnnpct Data
51) Tank Level Indicator
22) Tank Filler Knob
24) #6 Discharge Gate
35) Primer LeverSwitch
36) Primer Disconnect
38) Main Pump Drain
37) Change Over (transfer) Valve
39) Tank/Pump Handle
30) Outlet #3 with bleeder
97\ Ricrharria
28) #3 Discharge Gate
17) Right Ready Line Gate
18) Left Ready Line Gate
16) Auxiliary Throttle
23) #5 Discharge Gate
1 91 F n n i n e C n n l e r
4) Fuel Gauge
20) Pump Cooler
41) Air Chuck
Spartan 3D Pump Panel
(Driver’s Side Pump Panel)

2.10 DD 81
EXHIBIT 12
DD 82
CALL OR TEXT 911 (EMERGENCY) | FOR ALERTS TEXT YOUR ZIP CODE TO 888-777 CALL 311 (NON-EMERGENCY) | REPORT A SAFETY CONCERN
Our Mission
The mission of the San Francisco Fire Department is to protect the lives and property of the people of San Francisco and its visitors from res, natural disasters, accidents, hazardous materials incidents, and other causes requiring a rapid and skilled response by land or water; serve the needs of its most vulnerable residents through community paramedicine, and save lives and reduce suffering by providing emergency medical services; prevent harm through prevention services and education programs; and to provide a work environment that is free from harassment and discrimination, and values health, wellness, cultural diversity, and equity.

To nd out more about the San Francisco Fire Department's operations, and the services, programs and resources offered, please explore our website.

Welcome to Your
SF Fire Department

SEARCH ENGLISH

ABOUT CALENDAR FIRE COMMISSION NERT NEWS PROGRAMS SAFETY SERVICES Find Your Station
Home Page | SF Fire Website https://sf-fire.org/
1 of 3 11/11/2024, 2:56 PM
DD 83
EXHIBIT 13
DD 84

GAGNON, ANDREW PETER JR
LICENSE NUMBER: 2113 LICENSE TYPE: CONTROL SYSTEM ENGINEER LICENSE STATUS: RETIRED EXPIRATION DATE: DECEMBER 5, 2014 SECONDARY STATUS: N/A
CITY: SEEKONK STATE: MASSACHUSETTS COUNTY: OUT OF STATE ZIP: 02771

GAGNON, BRIAN
LICENSE NUMBER: 1574 LICENSE TYPE: FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER LICENSE STATUS: CLEAR EXPIRATION DATE: JUNE 30, 2025
SECONDARY STATUS: N/A
CITY: PLEASANT HILL STATE: CALIFORNIA COUNTY: CONTRA COSTA ZIP: 94523

GAGNON, CLARE J
LICENSE NUMBER: 8561 LICENSE TYPE: CIVIL ENGINEER
LICENSE STATUS: CANCELLED EXPIRATION DATE: DECEMBER 31, 1992 SECONDARY STATUS: N/A
CITY: WESTMINSTER STATE: CALIFORNIA COUNTY: ORANGE ZIP: 92683

GAGNON, EDWIN J
LICENSE NUMBER: 8874 LICENSE TYPE: MECHANICAL ENGINEER
LICENSE STATUS: CANCELLED EXPIRATION DATE: JUNE 30, 1987 SECONDARY STATUS: N/A
CITY: GLENDALE STATE: CALIFORNIA COUNTY: LOS ANGELES ZIP: 91208

GAGNON, FRANCIS J
LICENSE NUMBER: 13539 LICENSE TYPE: ELECTRICAL ENGINEER LICENSE STATUS: CANCELLED EXPIRATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 SECONDARY STATUS: N/A
CITY: WEST ALLIS STATE: WISCONSIN COUNTY: OUT OF STATE ZIP: 53214

GAGNON, IAN
LICENSE NUMBER: 41072 LICENSE TYPE: MECHANICAL ENGINEER LICENSE STATUS: CLEAR EXPIRATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2026 SECONDARY STATUS: N/A
CITY: SAN FRANCISCO STATE: CALIFORNIA COUNTY: SAN FRANCISCO ZIP: 94118

GAGNON, LAWRENCE WILLIAM
LICENSE NUMBER: 32476 LICENSE TYPE: CIVIL ENGINEER
LICENSE STATUS: CANCELLED EXPIRATION DATE: DECEMBER 31, 1996 SECONDARY STATUS: N/A
CITY: HIGHLANDS RANCH STATE: COLORADO COUNTY: OUT OF STATE ZIP: 80126

GAGNON, MARK E
LICENSE NUMBER: 7293 LICENSE TYPE: GEOLOGIST
LICENSE STATUS: CANCELLED EXPIRATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 SECONDARY STATUS: N/A
CITY: BOISE STATE: IDAHO COUNTY: OUT OF STATE ZIP: 83709

GAGNON, RONALD NORMAN
Search - DCA https://search.dca.ca.gov/results
1 of 2
DD 85
LICENSE NUMBER: 36461 LICENSE TYPE: CIVIL ENGINEER
LICENSE STATUS: CANCELLED EXPIRATION DATE: JUNE 30, 2000 SECONDARY STATUS: N/A
CITY: PROVIDENCE STATE: RHODE ISLAND COUNTY: OUT OF STATE ZIP: 02906 Search - DCA https://search.dca.ca.gov/results
2 of 2
DD 86
y,//dϭϰ
DD 87
/g2E/g4B/g3E/g6C/g47/g52/gDF/g3E/g7B/gB7/g51/g61/g75/g35/g53/g6D/g53/g6F/gDF/g22/g69/g4B/g5F/gA/g61/g61/g5C/g6D/g22/g5E/g46/g70/g49/g6D/g5E/g3E/g5F/gDF/gB/g53/g6F/g53/g7B/g4B/g5F/g6D/gDF/g1/g53/g49/g4B/g2D/g4B/g51/g53/g6D/g6F/g4B/g6C/gDF/g6F/g61/gDF/g35/g61/g6F/g4B 51848
First Name STEVE
Last Name GAGNON
License Status
Active
Discipline

ENGINEER/ENVIRONMENTAL
Initial Registration Date 23 Nov 2010
Expiration Date 31 Dec 2025
Address Line 1
17171 Bolsa Chica Street
Address Line 2
Apt. 89
City Huntington Beach
State California
Zip 92649
Phone 714-351-2013
DD 88
y,//dϭϱ
DD 89
PMQ Erin Corvinova
October 29, 2024
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
3 4 JENNIFER TOY, )
)
5 Plaintiff and Petitioner, )
)
6 vs. )
) Case No.:
7 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) CPF-22-517764

SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES )
8 COMMISSION, and DOES 1 through 10, )
)
9 Defendants and Respondents.)
_____________________________________)
10 11
12 13
14 15 DEPOSITION OF
16 ERIN CORVINOVA, PERSON MOST QUALIFIED
17 FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
18 TUESDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2024
19 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA
20 21
22 23
24 FILE NO.: AB 6985867
25 REPORTED BY: MAXIMILLIAN A. CONTRERAS, CSR 13876

Page 1 ends

Veritext Legal Solutions
[email protected] 818-551-7300 www.veritext.com DD 90
PMQ Erin Corvinova
October 29, 2024
1 want, I can show it to you. If water is used for any 2 purpose other than extinguishing accidental fires,
3 the W1C rates -- or maybe it's "WIC." I think it's
4 "W1C," -- rates for water delivery shall apply?
5 A. To my recollection, yes, that's the wording of
6 that.
7 Q. Does that mean that private fire service
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
has a meter, so that it's possible to meter the water?
A. The customers that are charged under the --
I don't know if it's W2 rate, the private fire service
rate -- are sprinklers and standpipes and separately
metered from the building usage. So that particular
technology and layout of piping, it is possible to meter because it's built into the building.

Q. So the water goes through the city mains,
it goes through a meter, and then into the pipes of
the person who has private fire service?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. And that's distinguished from public fire
20 service where there's no pipe connection to the person 21 or property receiving the water; right?
22 ATTY. HOLTZMAN: Objection. Form.
23 THE WITNESS: Yeah, I'm not quite certain what
24 you mean by "public fire service."
25 ///

Page 7 ends

Veritext Legal Solutions
[email protected] 818-551-7300 www.veritext.com DD 91
PMQ Erin Corvinova
October 29, 2024
1 BY ATTY. DRISCOLL:
2 Q. I mean -- well, the Cost of Service Study
3 done in 2023, I believe, refers to it as "AWSS" and
4 hydrants. Is there something else it could be?
5 A. No --
6 7
ATTY. HOLTZMAN: Objection. Form.

THE WITNESS: So the auxiliary supply system
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
and the fire hydrants are connected to our city mains
but do not have subsequent downstream permanent
connections to customers -- or hydrants.

BY ATTY. DRISCOLL:

Q. So that's how you tell private service
from AWSS/hydrants?
A. I believe that would be one of the many
distinguishing factors between those two types of
service.

Q. Now, if you have private fire service,
18 are you actually prohibited from using it for a
19 purpose other than fire?
20 A. I'm not familiar with the regulations around
21 how those accounts are set up.
22 Q. And how would I find out?
23 A. I'm not sure.
24 ATTY. HOLTZMAN: Objection.
25 Outside of the scope.

Page 8 ends

Veritext Legal Solutions
[email protected] 818-551-7300 www.veritext.com DD 92
PMQ Erin Corvinova
October 29, 2024
1 customers to check out a portable meter before they
2 put out the fire on their building.
3 BY ATTY. DRISCOLL:
4 Q. They actually can't put out the fire from a
5 hydrant; right? Fire hydrants are only available to 6 firefighters; right?
7 A. I actually do not know the restrictions around
8 usage of fire hydrants. That is my understanding,
9 however.
10 Q. Rate Resolution 2023-0103 was adopted May
11 23rd, 2023?
12 A. I believe that's correct.
13 Q. And prior to then, the City mailed out notices
14 of the rate increase?
15 A. That's correct.
16 Q. But they didn't mail out ballots, did they?
17 A. No.
18 Q. And that's not required by Section 6 of
19 Article XIII (D) of the California Constitution?
20 A. Correct --
21 ATTY. HOLTZMAN: Objection. Obviously.
22 ATTY. DRISCOLL: I'll just --
23 ATTY. HOLTZMAN: Objection.
24 ATTY. DRISCOLL: That wasn't quite a question.
25 ATTY. HOLTZMAN: It wasn't a question and it's

Page 16 ends

Veritext Legal Solutions
[email protected] 818-551-7300 www.veritext.com DD 93
PMQ Erin Corvinova
October 29, 2024
1 Q. Now if you look in the -- toward the
2 right side, beneath "Proposed Water Rates," it says
3 "FYE 2023."
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. What does "FYE" stand for?
6 A. "Fiscal Year Ending," which is a reference
7 to the fiscal years we discussed previously.
8 Q. So just -- so for instance, FYE 2024 would be
9 the same as July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024?
10 A. That is correct.
11 ATTY. DRISCOLL: Can we go off the record
12 for a minute.
13 (Off the record at 10:37 AM.)
14 (On the record at 10:40 AM.)
15 BY ATTY. DRISCOLL:
16 Q. The 2023 rate increase was based on the
17 2023 Cost of Service study?
18 A. Yes. The rates that we approved in
19 Resolution 23- -- I forget, but you mentioned it
20 several times.
21 Q. -0103.
22 A. -- -0103 were developed following the Cost of
23 Service study that was completed in 2023.
24 Q. And the numbers for the Cost of Service study
25 were developed through the San Francisco Public

Page 19 ends

Veritext Legal Solutions
[email protected] 818-551-7300 www.veritext.com DD 94
PMQ Erin Corvinova
October 29, 2024
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 Utilities Commission Water Financial Plan & Cost of
Service rate model and Excel spreadsheet; right?
ATTY. HOLTZMAN: Objection. Form.

THE WITNESS: We used a variety of financial
models, data sources in order to develop those rates.

I believe you may be referring to an Excel file that we previously provided as part of this action.

That was sort of the core working model we used in
developing our rates.
10 ATTY. DRISCOLL: Okay. Let's mark this as
11 Exhibit 2.
12 (Exhibit 2 marked for identification.)
13 ATTY. DRISCOLL: Exhibit 2 is the file that
14 you just referred to that San Francisco produced as 15 CCSF_529.
16 BY ATTY. DRISCOLL:
17 Q. Now, that spreadsheet has several sheets
18 within it; right?
19 A. Yes, there are multiple sheets within this
20 Excel workbook.
21 Q. And one of them is called "Cost."
22 Could you please take a look at that one.
23 A. Sorry. Which one?
24 Q. "Cost."
25 A. CoS?

Page 20 ends

Veritext Legal Solutions
[email protected] 818-551-7300 www.veritext.com DD 95

PROOF OF SERVICE
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32

PROOF OF SERVICE
I am an attorney for the plaintiffs/petitioners in Toy v. City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Superior Court Case Lead Case N o. CPF-22-517764 (Consolidated with Case No. CPF- 23-518342). My electronic service address is dond@ driscollomens.com. On the date of this declaration, I served the attached EXHIBITS TO THE DRISCOLL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (AQU ILINA) on the defendants and on the Office of the Attorney General.

Based on a court order or an agreement of the pa rties to accept electronic service, I caused the document to be served electronically on th e defendants at [email protected] and [email protected] in PDF format.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on November 14, 2024. _____________________
Donald P. Driscoll
1 From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2026 11:00 AM
To: Commission
Subject: Record for SFPUC April 28, 2026 Rate Hearing: Failure of SFPUC to Comply with Public Records Act Request
Attachments: CCSF_000813 - Firefighting Water Usage FY2021.xlsx; Erie & Folsom Commercial Fire.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Report Suspicious To the SFPUC Commission:

This email and its attachments are for inclusion in the record of the water and sewer rate increases to be considered by the SFPUC at the meeting currently scheduled for April 28, 2026.

These items are submitted as part of the record for agenda item 8, Public Hearing: (1) to consider whether to proceed with the proposed adoption of FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28 water rates and (2) to consider and adopt a new schedule of rates for retail water service in San Francisco and suburban areas, to be effective with meter readings on or after July 1, 2026. These items are also submitted as part of the record for agenda item 9, Public Hearing: (1) to consider whether to proceed with the proposed adoption of the FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28 sewer rates and (2) to consider and adopt a new annual schedule of rates for sewer service in San Francisco, to be effective with meter readings on or after July 1, 2026.

CCSF_000813 - Firefighting Water Usage FY2021 was produced in litigation discovery by the City of San Francisco. It shows that hydrant water was only used to extinguish fires 15 times during fiscal year 2020- 2021, and that the Emergency Fire Water System (EFWS) was used during only one fire, at Erie and Folsom on July 28, 2020. Erie & Folsom Commercial Fire.pdf is a KQED article showing that the Erie & Folsom fire involved commercial properties.

Sincerely,
Donald Driscoll
Adryane Omens
Driscoll & Omens
Attorneys for:

Mark Roh, Ted Loewenberg, and Rose Aquilina
*canons/ladder hose were used which is assumed to be max hydrant flow max LP flow is 1500gpm (750gpm x 2) maximum number of connections is 2 1500 max HP flow is 3000gpm (1000gpm x 3) maximum number of connections is 3 3000 Fire # Date # of Alarms Location Start Time End Time
Duration
(mins) # LP hydrants used
# HP
hydrants
used # LP end hoses used
# LP end
hoses used,
with
cannons/la
dder hose
# HP end
hoses
used
# HP end
hoses
used,
with
cannons/l
adder
hose
Est. Total
Flow LP
(gpm)
Est. Total
Flow HP
(gpm)
Est.

Volume
LP
(gallons)
Est.

Volume
HP
(gallons)
1 7/10/2020 3 1927 Washington 7:25:00 PM 8:52:00 PM 87 4 0 7 0 0 0 5,250 0 456,750 0 2 7/12/2020 2 3740 Sacramento 11:12:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 48 2 0 4 0 0 0 3,000 0 144,000 0 3 7/21/2020 2 1254 33rd Ave 7:44:00 PM 8:30:00 PM 46 2 0 3 0 0 0 2,250 0 103,500 0 4 7/28/2020 5 Erie & Folsom 6:55:00 AM 9:00:00 AM 125 0 0 7,574,629 4,191,691 5 7/31/2020 2 2233 Powell 2:05:00 AM 3:18:00 AM 73 2 0 0 2 0 0 3,000 0 219,000 0 6 8/9/2020 2 69 Carmelita St 3:29:00 AM 5:00:00 AM 91 2 0 4 0 0 0 3,000 0 273,000 0 7 9/12/2020 3 167 Shipley 1:49:00 AM 4:30:00 AM 161 4 0 5 1 0 0 5,250 0 845,250 0 8 11/4/2020 3 4261 23rd St 1:59:00 AM 2:45:00 AM 46 4 0 6 0 0 0 4,500 0 207,000 0 9 11/20/2020 3 440 Davis 1:30:00 AM 4:15:00 AM 165 3 0 5 0 0 0 3,750 0 618,750 0 10 1/1/2021 2 32 Del Monte 4:28:00 AM 5:52:00 AM 84 1 0 2 0 0 0 1,500 0 126,000 0 11 2/4/2021 2 575 Naples 12:03:00 AM 1:21:00 AM 78 2 0 2 0 0 0 1,500 0 117,000 0 12 3/5/2021 2 112 Eureka 11:59:00 AM 12:55:00 PM 56 2 0 4 0 0 0 3,000 0 168,000 0 13 5/17/2021 2 4 Wheat Ave 10:42:00 PM 11:54:00 PM 72 3 0 4 0 0 0 3,000 0 216,000 0 14 5/19/2021 2 182 Grattan St 6:00:00 AM 7:00:00 AM 60 3 0 4 0 0 0 3,000 0 180,000 0 15 6/13/2021 2 644 Odd Fellows Way 5:25:00 PM 7:02:00 PM 97 4 0 7 0 0 0 5,250 0 509,250 0 16 0 0000
17 0 0000
18 0 0000
19 0 0000
20 0 0000
21 0 0000
22 0 0000
23 0 0000
24 0 0000
25 0 0000
26 0 0000
27 0 0000
28 0 0000
29 0 0000
30 0 0000
31 0 0000
32 0 0000
33 0 0000
34 0 0000
35 0 0000
36 0 0000
37 0 0000
38 0 0000
39 0 0000
40 0 0000
41 0 0000
42 0 0000
43 0 0000
44 0 0000
45 0 0000
46 0 0000
47 0 0000
48 0 0000
49 0 0000
50 0 0000

1 From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2026 3:13 PM
To: Commission
Subject: Record for SFPUC April 28, 2026 Rate Hearing: Failure of SFPUC to Comply with Public Records Act Request
Attachments: Data Analysis.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious This email and its attachment are for inclusion in the record of the water and sewer rate increases to be considered by the SFPUC at the meeting currently scheduled for April 28, 2026.

This item is submitted as part of the record for agenda item 8, Public Hearing: (1) to consider whether to proceed with the proposed adoption of FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28 water rates and (2) to consider and adopt a new schedule of rates for retail water service in San Francisco and suburban areas, to be effective with meter readings on or after July 1, 2026. This item is also submitted as part of the record for agenda item 9, Public Hearing: (1) to consider whether to proceed with the proposed adoption of the FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28 sewer rates and (2) to consider and adopt a new annual schedule of rates for sewer service in San Francisco, to be effective with meter readings on or after July 1, 2026.

Sincerely,
Donald Driscoll
Adryane Omens
Driscoll & Omens
Attorneys for:

Mark Roh, Ted Loewenberg, and Rose Aquilina
PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS:

INCLUSION OF FIREFIGHTING COSTS IN PROPOSED RATES

-2-
Introduction
City cannot include firefighting costs, including costs of hydrants, in water rates. But, even if it were permissible to include those costs, Proposition 218 prohibits fees for water service that exceed the proportional cost of service to the parcel. “[I]f the phrase ‘proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel’ is to mean anything, it has to be that [Section 6(b)(3)] assumes that there really is an ascertainable cost of service that can be attributed to a specific—hence that little word ‘the’—parcel. ” ( Capistrano Taxpayers Assn., Inc. v. City of San Juan Capistrano (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 1493, 1505.) City’s Cost of Service Study (Study) does not demonstrate the required proportionality.

City’s Study identifies “Public Fire Protection” costs of $4.8 million for 2019, recovering those costs at $1.35 per month per “meter equivalent. ” (Study, p. 47, Table 35.) Meter equivalents are based on the relative capacity of a parcel’s meter size. (Study, p. 46.) The identical charge per meter equivalent is assigned across all classes of users on whom the charge is imposed, including business, commercial, and residential users alike (Study, p. 8), but the study provides no analysis of whether this allocation satisfies Proposition 218’s proportionality requirement.

Only two sentences in the entire Study shed light on the rationale for using meter equivalents. The first states, “public fire protection costs are reallocated back to all customer classes based on their fire flow requirements. ” (Study, p. 35.) Despite this claim, the study shows that fire protection costs are not allocated to all customer classes. No costs are allocated to Residential Irrigation, Nonresidential Irrigation, Fire Service, and Nonpotable (Raw Water) classes. (Study, p. 47, Table 36.) In any event, the study never defines “fire flow requirements” or provides evidence that they correlate with City’s actual costs of providing service.

The second sentence states, “[f]or the meter capacity charges and fire protection, equivalent meters are used, as opposed to accounts, in order to recognize the fact that larger meters have a higher water flow potential and utilize greater system capacity. ” (Study, p. 46.) This sentence substitutes “meter equivalents” for “fire flow requirements” without explaining the relationship between these concepts or providing evidence that either measure correlates with fire protection costs.

These two sentences constitute the Study’s entire rationale for its public fire cost allocation methodology. While the Study states the formula adheres to industry standards set by the American Water Works Association and the Water Environment Federation (Study, p. 3), it provides no discussion of those standards or whether they account for -3-
Proposition 218 requirements. City adopted a formula rather than determining its actual costs to serve specific parcels.

City’s proportionality assumptions are unsupported for any of its hydrants. It also does not account for the fact that the cost of its Emergency Fire Water System (EFWS) is charged to customers throughout the City while the system reaches only part of the City.

EFWS Hydrant Coverage Analysis
Purpose
To quantify what fraction of San Francisco addresses lie within operational hose-lay range of an EFWS hydrant.

Operational Threshold
San Francisco Fire Department Deputy Chief Luttropp testified that 500 feet is the operational hose-lay limit from a hydrant.

Findings
Where EFWS can reach was evaluated two ways. First, residential meter addresses produced by the City in discovery in Toy v. San Francisco were cross-referenced to the City’s Enterprise Addressing System. Ninety-nine percent of meter addresses were successfully matched. Distance along the City’s street centerline network from each meter address to the nearest EFWS hydrant was then computed. Only 15.7 percent of Single Family Residential meter accounts and 48.2 percent of Multiple Family Residential meter accounts were found to be within five hundred feet of an EFWS hydrant. Within two hundred feet, the figures are 5.0 percent and 18.6 percent respectively.

City did not provide meter address information requested in a California Public Records Act Request, so a per-meter comparison to other account types is not possible. The City has, however, published parcel-level land use data, and that data establishes that residential parcels, in contrast to most non-residential parcel categories, generally fall outside EFWS hose-lay range.

City’s Deputy Fire Chief testified that the San Francisco Fire Department’s operational limit is 500 feet from a fire hydrant. (December 18, 2024, Luttropp deposition in Toy v. City of San Francisco, San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CPF-22-517764 at p. 35:7-14.) There are 388,307 addresses in City’s Address System. Of those, 190,160 addresses are within a 500 foot distance of an EFWS hydrant and 198,147 are at a distance greater than 500 feet. In other words, 51.0 percent of San Francisco’s addresses lie beyond Luttropp’s stated 500- foot operational hose-lay limit from the nearest EFWS hydrant. Luttropp additionally -4-
testified that it was useful to be within “a couple of lengths of hose” of a hydrant and that standard hose lengths are 50 feet.

EFWS Reach and Land Use
A parcel-level analysis using the City’s published 2023 Land Use dataset also shows the general failure of EFWS to serve residential San Francisco. The Land Use dataset classifies every parcel in San Francisco by use. For each parcel, network distance from every address on the parcel to the nearest EFWS hydrant was calculated. A parcel was counted as covered if any address on the parcel was within five hundred feet of an EFWS hydrant.

Parcels classified as Vacant or Open Space were excluded.

The results are as follows:

Land use class
Number of
Parcels
Parcels
Within 500 ft
Percent
within 500 ft

RESIDENT
(residential) 120,353 30,765 25.6%
MIXRES
(mixed residential) 58,197 35,521 61.0%
Residential
subtotal 178,550 66,286 37.1%

-5-
Land use class
Number
of
Parcels
Parcels
Within 500 ft
Percent
within 500 ft

VISITOR
(hotels/motels) 2,336 2,315 99.1%
MIXED
(mixed use) 3,103 2,460 79.3%
CIE
(cultural/institutional
/educational)
1,676 1,296 77.3%

RETAIL/ENT
(retail/commercial) 1,558 1,114 71.5%
MIPS
(OƯice (Managerial,
Information,
Professional
Services))
2,066 1,396 67.6%
PDR
(industrial
(Production,
Distribution, Repair)) 450 279 62.0%
MED
(medical) 213 127 59.6%
Non-residential
subtotal 11,402 8,987 78.8%

Only 37.1 percent of residential parcels are within five hundred feet of an EFWS hydrant. By contrast, 78.8 percent of non-residential parcels are within that range.

Data Sources
Data on which this analysis was based is entirely from the City of San Francisco.

Address set. “Addresses” are the entries in DataSF | Open Data Portal San Francisco Addresses - Enterprise Addressing System. An address is a point, located at the coordinates assigned by the City. Downloaded April 1, 2026, from https://data.sfgov.org/Geographic-Locations-and-Boundaries/San-Francisco-Addresses- Enterprise-Addressing-Syst/3mea-di5p/data_preview
Hydrant set. “EFWS hydrants” are the 1,722 hydrants in the EFWS_Hydrants sublayer of the SFFD CDD_Hydrants geodatabase. The analysis does not use hydrants from the Potable Water System (PWS), only the Emergency Fire Water System identified by the City. Hydrants geodatabase was provided by City in response to Public Records Act Request 26-1652. -6-
Street network. City’s Streets - Active and Retired. Downloaded April 11, 2026, from webpage https://data.sfgov.org/Geographic-Locations-and-Boundaries/Streets-Active- and-Retired/3psu-pn9h/data_preview
Land use data. Downloaded April 3, 2026, from https://data.sfgov.org/Geographic- Locations-and-Boundaries/San-Francisco-Land-Use/c5ge-t6pj/data_preview Residential Meter Addresses and Types data. This data is from a file produced during discovery in Toy v. San Francisco, San Francisco Superior Court, San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CPF-22-517764.

Method
Distance. “Network distance” from an address to a hydrant is the length of the shortest path along the street centerline network from the address to the hydrant, computed using Dijkstra’s algorithm applied to City’s Streets - Active and Retired dataset. Network distance assumes an absence of obstructions on the hose-path.

Nearest hydrant. For each address, the “nearest EFWS hydrant” is the hydrant that minimizes distance along the network of streets, not straight-line distance. An address may be close to one hydrant as the crow flies but closer to a diƯerent hydrant along the street network, for instance, when a building sits between the two.

Implementation. Network distances were computed using QGIS’s network analysis library (QgsGraphAnalyzer). The street-network graph was constructed from the Streets dataset with a topology tolerance of 5 feet, which closes small endpoint mismatches at intersections without merging genuinely separate street segments. To the extent that hose can be laid through paths not represented in the street centerline data, for example, across the final stretch from curb to structure on the address parcel, actual hose-lay distance may be slightly diƯerent from the computed network distance.

Meter-level coverage. The City produced a file in discovery in Toy v. San Francisco listing 145,453 active residential water service accounts (Single Family and Multiple Family), with the address of each meter. Those addresses were located in the City’s Enterprise Addressing System by canonicalizing both the meter address and the corresponding EAS (USPS Electronic Address Sequencing) components (address number, street name, street type) and joining on the canonical form. Ninety-nine percent of meter addresses were successfully located in this manner. For each located meter, network distance to the nearest EFWS hydrant was computed using the same Dijkstra method described above.

Parcel-level coverage. Addresses are grouped to parcels using the City’s parcel number field, supplemented by a spatial (point-in-polygon) fallback for condominium sub-parcels -7-
and other addressing features that don’t have a direct match in the City’s land-use parcel data. For this analysis a parcel is considered “covered” at 200 feet or 500 feet if any address on the parcel has network distance to the nearest EFWS hydrant at or below the threshold.

Land use classification. Each parcel’s “land use class” is the value of the landuse field in the City’s published 2023 Land Use dataset. The class is determined by the City, based on the use of the parcel as recorded in assessor data and subsequent permits. The classes reported are those the City defines: RESIDENT, MIXRES, MIXED, CIE, MED, MIPS, RETAIL/ENT, PDR, VISITOR, OPENSPACE, and VACANT, except that OPENSPACE and VACANT are excluded.

Coordinate reference system. All calculations were performed in the EPSG:2227 coordinate reference system (NAD83 / California State Plane Zone 3), which expresses position and distance in US survey feet. The addresses dataset, which the City publishes in EPSG:4326 (WGS84 latitude/longitude), was reprojected to EPSG:2227 before analysis.

Coverage percentage. For each land use class, the “percentage within [threshold]” is the count of parcels in that class with at least one address within the threshold, divided by the total number of parcels in that class.

1 From: Peter Drekmeier <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2026 3:00 PM
To: Commission
Subject: SFPUC Leadership
Attachments: Top 10 Moments of SFPUC Leadership.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Dear Commissioners, As we approach the end of Earth Mont h, I’d thoug ht I’d reshare my "Top 10 Mom ents of SFPUC Le adership” from Earth Day 2024. I hope I c an add som ethi ng new to the list in the c oming m ont hs. -Peter ZjQcmQR YFpfptBa nnerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.

Report Suspicious
ZjQcmQR YFpfptBa nner End
Dear Commissioners,
As we approach the end of Earth Month, I’d thought I’d reshare my "Top 10 Moments of SFPUC Leadership” from Earth Day 2024.

I hope I can add something new to the list in the coming months. -Peter
Please note my new email address.
-----------------------
Peter Drekmeier
Policy Director
Yosemite Rivers Alliance
(Formerly Tuolumne River Trust)
[email protected]

Top 10 Moments of SFPUC Leadership

10) Under the leadership of Commissioner Ajami, General Public Comment was returned to the beginning of meeƟng agendas and remote public comment was reinstated (2023/24).

9) Commissioners Vietor and Maxwell voted no on a Water Supply Assessment because staff kept determining there was enough water for development but not for fish (2020).

8) The SFPUC commiƩed $2 million toward the acquisiƟon of Dos Rios Ranch at the confluence of the Tuolumne and San Joaquin Rivers. The site has been restored, and is now in the process of becoming the newest State Park (2010).

7) At only his second meeƟng, newly-appointed Commissioner Harrington iniƟated a series of seven workshops (deep dives) aimed at producing a beƩer understanding of Tuolumne River issues (2020).

6) Despite opposiƟon from GM Herrera, the Commission directed staff to schedule a seventh and final workshop focusing on the Design Drought (2022).

5) Commissioners Ajami and Moran requested a comparison of water demand projecƟons produced by the Water Enterprise for use in the Urban Water Management Plan vs. sales projecƟons produced by the Finance Bureau, resulƟng in a very informaƟve staff report (2022).

4) Commissioner Moran worked closely with the NGOs to facilitate a water demand workshop that included a number of scenarios that explored how various factors, such as water demand and length of drought planning, influenced water supply needs (2021).

3) AŌer being alerted that SFPUC staff were aƩempƟng to use contractual obligaƟons to represent current water demand in the SFPUC’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, Commissioner Moran instructed staff to use honest number, which reduced projected water raƟoning by 15 percentage points (2021).

2) Less than two months into her first term, Commissioner Vietor added two clauses to the resoluƟon approving the Water System Improvement Program (WSIP) – to set aggressive water conservaƟon and recycling goals and to undertake every effort to reduce diversions from the Tuolumne River (2008).

1) On his first day as the SFPUC’s new GM, Ed Harrington contacted the Tuolumne River Trust to propose a compromise on the WSIP that would cap water sales at 265 mgd unƟl at least 2018.

Following a series of negoƟaƟon meeƟngs between the SFPUC and NGOs, the “Phased WSIP” sailed through without any legal challenges, and actual water demand in 2018 was 196 mgd (2007/08).

Compiled by Peter Drekmeier, Tuolumne River Trust, April 17, 2024. 1 From: Perez, Jenny (VAC) <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2026 3:20 PM
To: Perez, Jenny (VAC)
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Invitation: Historic 250th Anniversary Memorial Day Commemoration Attachments: SFNC EVENT FLYER V2 1 (1) (1).pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious Dear Fellow Commissioners,
My name is Commissioner Jenny Perez, and I am writing on behalf of the Presidio National Cemetery to invite you to join us for a landmark occasion in San Francisco’s history.

As colleagues in public service, your presence is requested at a historic Memorial Day Commemoration on Monday, May 25, 2026. This year’s event carries extraordinary significance as it marks the 250th anniversary, a milestone that honors two and a half centuries of military heritage and connects our city directly to the national America 250 celebration.

Schedule of Events:
 10:30 AM: Musical Prelude
 11:00 AM: Formal Memorial Day Ceremony
While state and federal officials often attend, the participation of our city’s various Commissions underscores our local commitment to civic unity. Your role in shaping San Francisco’s future makes your presence vital as we reflect on the history that built our community.

Logistics:
 RSVP: Please confirm your attendance and guest count by May 15, 2026.  Address: 1 Lincoln Blvd, San Francisco, CA 94129.
 Reserved Seating: We have reserved space for you and your guests in the first 2-3 rows. These seats are available on a first-come basis, and I will be personally available in that section to assist you.
 Parking: Designated parking is available at the Golden Gate Club and Presidio Parking. Staff at the front gate will direct you to General and ADA-accessible parking.

We would be deeply honored to have the city’s Commissions represented as we commemorate this extraordinary chapter of our history. Please feel free to reach me directly at the number below with any questions.

With gratitude and respect, we hope to see you there.
2 Regards,
Jenny Perez
Commissioner, Seat 1
Veterans Affairs Commission of San Francisco and County C: (415) 992—2081

www.SFHSA.org

MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVANCE
at

SAN FRANCISCO NATIONAL CEMETERY
1 Lincoln Blvd. Presidio of San Francisco
Join us in honoring our fallen heroes on
MONDAY • MAY 25 • 11 a.m.

Music begins at 10:30 a.m.

Speakers, Color Guard, Rifle Salute
Gold Star Family wreath presentation
Bagpiper, Band and Vocalists, U.S. Coast Guard flyover

Emcee: Ken Wayne, Navy veteran, journalist

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs • San Francisco National Cemetery For more information call 650-589-7737

1 From: Mendoza, Nubia (MYR) <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2026 5:29 PM
Cc: Adeyemi, Andre (MYR); Jones, Ej (MYR); MYR Comm Affairs Staff Subject: [INVITATION] Arab American Heritage Month Celebration | April 29th Attachments: Arab American Heritage Month Celebration 2026 (1).pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious Dear Commissioners,
On behalf of Mayor Daniel Lurie, I am pleased to invite you to a City Hall celebration in honor of Arab American Heritage Month on Wednesday, April 29, 2026, at 4:00 PM.

The event will be held at the Mayor’s Balcony, with refreshments served following the speaking program.

We hope you can join us for this special occasion.

Best,
Nubia Mendoza (she/her)
Community Liaison
City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
OƯice of Mayor Daniel Lurie
[email protected] | c: (415) 575-5641
Mayor Daniel Lurie
requests the pleasure of your company at
a City Hall celebration in honor of
Arab American Heritage Month
on Wednesday, the twenty-ninth of April
at four in the afternoon
San Francisco City Hall
Mayor’s Balcony
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
Kindly reply by April 27th to:
https://forms.cloud.microsoft/g/WVpGYphstA
This invitation is non-transferable

1 From: David Smernoff <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2026 5:09 PM
To: Commission
Subject: Urban Water Management Plan comments
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious Dear SFPUC Commissioners -
As a California Water Service customer I am concerned about the proposed increase in water rates and how they will impact our family finances. While I understand the need to improve infrastructure and consistently perform routine maintenance, I am also aware that throughout the SFPUC system, deferred maintenance has dramatically increased costs. It seems to me that those responsible for improper long-term maintenance and planning should bear the costs of their failures, and not ratepayers.

Even more troubling are the inflated demand projections being used and deeply flawed Design Drought scenario are pushing a false demand for expensive storage facilities that are not needed and driving much of the rate increases.

I urge you to direct staff to revisit the Design Drought and inflated demand projections before finalizing their UWMP. Ratepayers deserve more scientifically grounded demand projects and drought scenarios before being locked into ever increasing water rates. The Bay Area is already far more expensive than the rest of the Country and the SFPUC has a responsibility to constrain water rates and protect ratepayers.

Furthermore, the UWMP impacts the health of the rivers that carry our water, impacts the survival of salmon and the myriad species that rely on adequate in stream flows. We have a responsibility to take care of the ecological systems that are the bedrock of human existence. I hope you will take that responsibility seriously.

Might I suggest that you hold a public workshop before finalizing the UWMP and listen carefully to the NGO’s that are experts in these matters. As they are not beholden to special interests I trust their views on these issues. Together we can make wise decisions, ensure adequate water supply, and protect the environment.

I look forward to your thoughtful consideration on April 28th, 2026 and will be delighted to attend the workshop.

Respectfully,
David Smernoff, Ph.D.
112 Foxwood Rd.
2 PV CA 94028
1 From: Adryane Driscoll <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2026 5:09 PM
To: Lennear, Tiffany
Cc: Commission
Subject: Confirmation of receipt for materials submitted April 26–27 for April 28 rate hearing (agenda items 8 and 9)
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Report Suspicious Dear Director Lennear:

On April 26 and 27, 2026, Donald Driscoll of Driscoll & Omens, on behalf of Mark Roh, Ted Loewenberg, and Rose Aquilina, submitted materials by email to [email protected] for inclusion in the record of the April 28, 2026 rate hearing on agenda items 8 and 9. The submissions were sent from [email protected] under the subject line "Record for SFPUC April 28, 2026 Rate
Hearing: Failure of SFPUC to Comply with Public Records Act Request." Twenty emails were sent. They are identified below by send time and the first listed attachment of each (all times Pacific):
# Sent First attachment Attachments
1 Sun 4/26 1:11 PM Request and Response 26-15… 3
2 Sun 4/26 2:07 PM 2025-1209_1591-Currents-Fe… 19
3 Sun 4/26 2:07 PM MidtownTerraceHOA_Rates P… 9
4 Sun 4/26 2:07 PM FY27 10 Year Financial Plan R… 5
5 Sun 4/26 2:07 PM FYE 2026 Beginning CP and … 3
6 Sun 4/26 3:22 PM 2025-1209_1591-Currents-Fe… 10
7 Sun 4/26 3:30 PM BayviewMerchantAssn_Rates… 4
8 Sun 4/26 3:42 PM FY2027-28 - Capital Plan Rep… 5
9 Sun 4/26 3:51 PM Rates Presentation_2026_MA… 4
10 Sun 4/26 3:53 PM RatesPresentation_W.WW.P… 2
11 Sun 4/26 3:55 PM RatesPresentation_W.WW.P… 2
12 Sun 4/26 7:29 PM Excerpts.pdf 2
13 Sun 4/26 7:46 PM CDD_Hydrants.gdb.zip 1
14 Mon 4/27 9:31 AM SFCity Atty Communication.p… 2
2 # Sent First attachment Attachments
15 Mon 4/27 10:10 AM Opposition to Summary Jud… 11
16 Mon 4/27 10:17 AM Driscoll Declaration Exhibits… 1
17 Mon 4/27 10:24 AM RJN.pdf 1
18 Mon 4/27 11:00 AM CCSF_000813 - Firefighting… 2
19 Mon 4/27 11:00 AM CCSF_000529 - SFPUC_Water… 1
20 Mon 4/27 3:13 PM Data Analysis.pdf 1
I am writing in advance of the April 28 hearing to confirm that these materials are reflected in the record for agenda items 8 and 9. Please confirm:

1. Receipt of each of the above twenty emails. If any were not received, please identify which by send time.

2. That the materials are reflected in the record for the April 28 hearing and will be available to the Commissioners in advance of their vote.

If any of the submitted materials were not received, please advise on alternative means of submission so that they may be transmitted before the hearing.

I have also left voicemail messages at your direct line and at the Commission's main number.

Thank you,
Adryane Omens
Driscoll & Omens
510-527-4500
(Sent from [email protected] to ensure delivery; the original submissions were sent from [email protected].)
1 From: SolutionsNotSandbags San Francisco <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2026 9:15 AM
Subject: Thanks for the excellent coverage Ingleside Light and Casey Michie:

Attachments: 2026. 4.28. Ingleside Light-Casey Michie article.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious Thanks for the excellent coverage Ingleside Light and Casey Michie:

Sewage Flooding:

Neighbors Fear Wastewater From Ingleside's New Housing
Will Overwhelm Strained Sewer
https://www.inglesidelight.com/?ref=the-ingleside-light-newsletter April 28, 2026,
“We experienced firsthand the adage shit goes downhill, and I have the toilet paper in my backyard to prove it.”
By Casey Michie
L. Richard Billups woke up Christmas morning to find his 2000 Chevrolet Corvette ruined.

An overnight storm caused a flood of brown stormwater and sewage out front Billups' home on Ashton Avenue, where he has lived for about 50 years in San Francisco's Ingleside Terraces. The flood destroyed his car’s electrical systems, monitors, carpet and seats. “The insurance company said the cost would be more than the car is worth as far as market value is concerned,” he said. “That's the price to them. It meant a lot more to me.” Video footage provided to The Ingleside Light by a neighbor shows the brown water rushing from Ocean Avenue onto Ashton Avenue around 2:43 a.m. on Dec. 25, overrunning gutters and pooling on sidewalks and yards.

In the span of minutes the sewage and stormwater flooded Ashton Avenue.

The incident was the latest in a series of combined stormwater-sewage floods that residents say the city has repeatedly failed to address. With the 1,100-unit Balboa Reservoir project underway and a seven- story mixed-use development proposed nearby, neighbors are demanding upgrades to an undersized 2 sewer under Ocean Avenue before increased wastewater from additional residents adds further strain to a sewage system they say has been inadequate for years.

William Walraven, an Ashton Avenue resident, said he has dealt with many similar floods over the years, and the harm is real. Walraven said he fears the problem will worsen as climate change brings more extreme rainfall to the region.

“We experienced firsthand the adage shit goes downhill, and I have the toilet paper in my backyard to prove it,” he said. “These are very disruptive. They damage and ruin living spaces and personal property.” The Christmas Day flooding prompted 20 Ingleside Terraces residents to voice their growing concerns. In a letter sent Jan. 12 to state and local government officials obtained by The Ingleside Light, the residents said the flooding demonstrated the sewer system is unable to handle current demands. They said adding new development to the corridor without fixing the underlying infrastructure would make a bad situation worse.
“Given the Ocean Avenue sewer's documented history of surcharging during moderate rainfall, and its inability to manage overland flow even after pipe enlargement and high-capacity catch basin upgrades, any additional load risks increasing the frequency and severity of backups and overland flooding within this constrained sewer system,” the letter stated.

The residents want regulators to monitor the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission’s handling of sewage discharges in the neighborhood.

The commission’s staff attributes the flooding to the storm's intensity, saying rain gauges recorded between 0.39 and 0.54 inches of rain within 15 minutes.

“When very intense storms occur over a short period of time, ponding can occur,” SFPUC spokesperson Nancy Crowley said.

San Francisco is the only Californian city, apart from older sections of downtown Sacramento, served by a combined sewer system that handles both sewage and stormwater in a single set of pipes. When that combined flow increases beyond capacity or hits a bottleneck, sewage backs up onto neighborhood streets.

The Balboa Reservoir development project includes stormwater storage. | Alex Mullaney/Ingleside Light Greg Braswell, a retired hydraulic engineer who spent 22 years with the city's Department of Public Works, said a mixture of stormwater and sewage traveling downhill toward Ocean Avenue hits a constriction near the Ingleside Library. When the pipe cannot handle the volume, sewage backs up out of the manhole and flows down the avenue's gutters before spreading onto the flatter grade of Ashton Avenue and pooling on Urbano Drive.

“About half of it is water that could not get into the sewers, and about half of it is likely to be sewage coming out of the manholes by the library,” he said.

The SFPUC countered that steps have been taken to ensure the Balboa Reservoir development does not worsen flooding on Ocean Avenue.

“The project includes requirements for the developer to install large stormwater storage pipes and weirs that will temporarily store and convey the increased stormwater flows from the project,” Crowley said. “These requirements were crafted specifically with Ocean Avenue sewer capacity in mind.” 3 Braswell is skeptical that the additional storage will be enough. He said the stormwater requirements do not address the sewage that the new development will add. “Although they are going to try to slow down the stormwater coming from those new homes, they're not going to slow down the sewage coming out of the toilets,” he said. “It's the sewage that the folks were complaining about, not the rainwater.”

The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission is investing $634 million in sewage and stormwater improvements across three areas of the city. But the spending wasn't the utility's own decision.

A 2021 order from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board determined the city’s collection systems “cannot convey or contain all wastewater and stormwater” during heavy storms.

Solutions Not Sandbags, a group that has advocated for sewer improvements since 2014, said the same storm that caused the overflow along Ashton Avenue also led to the flooding of at least eight homes along Cayuga Avenue.

“After all these many years, sewer-flooding is still happening on Cayuga Avenue,” the group wrote in a February statement. “The SFPUC offers excuses and explanations, free sandbags and the nightmare of paperwork and litigation for the victims. When will they offer a real solution?”

Ingleside Terraces was not included in the 2021 order issued by regulators.

Braswell, who has advised Solutions Not Sandbags on technical matters, said the neighborhood's exclusion from the order came down to a lack of documented evidence.

For now, the neighbors will have to continue their advocacy.

The Office of District 11 Supervisor Chyanne Chen declined to comment on the Ocean Avenue and Cayuga Avenue Christmas Day flooding. Staff with the Office of District 7 Supervisor Myrna Melgar said they have been in contact with SFPUC about the matter to obtain more information.

Billups, whose Corvette was ruined, believes the flooding was preventable.

“The city should have addressed this the first time it happened,” Billups said. “Obviously, they didn't do anything about it because now it has happened again.”

Alex Mullaney contributed reporting.

SOLUTIONS NOT SANDBAGS
Bringing Awareness to SF's Failing Sewer System
Website: SolutionsNotSandbags.org
YouTube I Instagram I Twitter I Facebook

Page of 16
Sewage Flooding:

Neighbors Fear Wastewater From Ingleside's New Housing
Will Overwhelm Strained Sewer
https://www.inglesidelight.com/?ref=the-ingleside-light-newsletter April 28, 2026,
“We experienced firsthand the adage shit goes downhill, and I have the toilet paper in my backyard to prove it.”
By Casey Michie
L. Richard Billups woke up Christmas morning to find his 2000 Chevrolet Corvette ruined.

An overnight storm caused a flood of brown stormwater and sewage out front Billups' home on Ashton Avenue, where he has lived for about 50 years in San Francisco's Ingleside Terraces. The flood destroyed his car’s electrical systems, monitors, carpet and seats.
“The insurance company said the cost would be more than the car is worth as far as market value is concerned,” he said. “That's the price to them. It meant a lot more to me.”
Video footage provided to The Ingleside Light by a neighbor shows the brown water rushing from Ocean Avenue onto Ashton Avenue around 2:43 a.m. on Dec. 25, overrunning gutters and pooling on sidewalks and yards.

Page of 26
In the span of minutes the sewage and stormwater flooded Ashton Avenue.

Page of 36
The incident was the latest in a series of combined stormwater-sewage floods that residents say the city has repeatedly failed to address. With the 1,100-unit Balboa Reservoir project underway and a seven-story mixed-use development proposed nearby, neighbors are demanding upgrades to an undersized sewer under Ocean Avenue before increased wastewater from additional residents adds further strain to a sewage system they say has been inadequate for years.

William Walraven, an Ashton Avenue resident, said he has dealt with many similar floods over the years, and the harm is real. Walraven said he fears the problem will worsen as climate change brings more extreme rainfall to the region. “We experienced firsthand the adage shit goes downhill, and I have the toilet paper in my backyard to prove it,” he said. “These are very disruptive. They damage and ruin living spaces and personal property.”
The Christmas Day flooding prompted 20 Ingleside Terraces residents to voice their growing concerns. In a letter sent Jan. 12 to state and local government officials obtained by The Ingleside Light, the residents said the flooding demonstrated the sewer system is unable to handle current demands. They said adding new development to the corridor without fixing the underlying infrastructure would make a bad situation worse. “Given the Ocean Avenue sewer's documented history of surcharging during moderate rainfall, and its inability to manage overland flow even after pipe enlargement and high-capacity catch basin upgrades, any additional load risks increasing the frequency and severity of backups and overland flooding within this constrained sewer system,” the letter stated.

The residents want regulators to monitor the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission’s handling of sewage discharges in the neighborhood.

The commission’s staff attributes the flooding to the storm's intensity, saying rain gauges recorded between 0.39 and 0.54 inches of rain within 15 minutes. “When very intense storms occur over a short period of time, ponding can occur,” SFPUC spokesperson Nancy Crowley said.

San Francisco is the only Californian city, apart from older sections of downtown Sacramento, served by a combined sewer system that handles both sewage and Page of 46
stormwater in a single set of pipes. When that combined flow increases beyond capacity or hits a bottleneck, sewage backs up onto neighborhood streets.

The Balboa Reservoir development project includes stormwater storage. | Alex Mullaney/Ingleside Light
Greg Braswell, a retired hydraulic engineer who spent 22 years with the city's Department of Public Works, said a mixture of stormwater and sewage traveling downhill toward Ocean Avenue hits a constriction near the Ingleside Library. When the pipe cannot handle the volume, sewage backs up out of the manhole and flows down the avenue's gutters before spreading onto the flatter grade of Ashton Avenue and pooling on Urbano Drive.
“About half of it is water that could not get into the sewers, and about half of it is likely to be sewage coming out of the manholes by the library,” he said.

The SFPUC countered that steps have been taken to ensure the Balboa Reservoir development does not worsen flooding on Ocean Avenue.

Page of 56
“The project includes requirements for the developer to install large stormwater storage pipes and weirs that will temporarily store and convey the increased stormwater flows from the project,” Crowley said. “These requirements were crafted specifically with Ocean Avenue sewer capacity in mind.”
Braswell is skeptical that the additional storage will be enough. He said the stormwater requirements do not address the sewage that the new development will add. “Although they are going to try to slow down the stormwater coming from those new homes, they're not going to slow down the sewage coming out of the toilets,” he said. “It's the sewage that the folks were complaining about, not the rainwater.” The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission is investing $634 million in sewage and stormwater improvements across three areas of the city. But the spending wasn't the utility's own decision.

A 2021 order from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board determined the city’s collection systems “cannot convey or contain all wastewater and stormwater” during heavy storms.

Solutions Not Sandbags, a group that has advocated for sewer improvements since 2014, said the same storm that caused the overflow along Ashton Avenue also led to the flooding of at least eight homes along Cayuga Avenue.
“After all these many years, sewer-flooding is still happening on Cayuga Avenue,” the group wrote in a February statement. “The SFPUC offers excuses and explanations, free sandbags and the nightmare of paperwork and litigation for the victims. When will they offer a real solution?”
Ingleside Terraces was not included in the 2021 order issued by regulators.

Braswell, who has advised Solutions Not Sandbags on technical matters, said the neighborhood's exclusion from the order came down to a lack of documented evidence.

For now, the neighbors will have to continue their advocacy.

The Office of District 11 Supervisor Chyanne Chen declined to comment on the Ocean Avenue and Cayuga Avenue Christmas Day flooding. Staff with the Office of District 7 Page of 66
Supervisor Myrna Melgar said they have been in contact with SFPUC about the matter to obtain more information.

Billups, whose Corvette was ruined, believes the flooding was preventable. “The city should have addressed this the first time it happened,” Billups said. “Obviously, they didn't do anything about it because now it has happened again.” Alex Mullaney contributed reporting.
1 From: Nancy Arbuckle <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2026 3:33 PM
To: Commission
Cc: [email protected]; Sauter, Danny (BOS)
Subject: Water rates
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious Dear Commissioners and Staff,
Due to a medical emergency, I was not able to be at the SFPUC meeting today — but that does not mean I am not paying attention. I live in a 30-unit condo complex where our HOA dues have been going up annually. Needless to say, everyone is unhappy about the latest news about water rate increases.

As you are no doubt aware, demand for water has been declining in San Francisco for 30 years. All of us who live here can attest to how water usage has changed since the turn of the century.

We've seen how SF’s Rec and Park Department has redone the sprinkler systems in most of our city parks. Our parks are way less soggy now than they used to be. Sprinkler systems are more finely tuned and apply water much more effectively.

All over the city both public and private gardens now contain drought-tolerant plants. The use of native plants, adapted to local conditions, is now common and significantly reduces water demand in the landscape. Also widely used today — cacti and succulents — both of which have limited water needs.

Almost all the toilets we now flush are low-flow ones. It takes only a small fraction of the water it used to to make waste disappear.

And just about everyone is using low-flow shower heads. We are conservers and savers. And we value our water. Adjust your demand figures accordingly.

Please treat us ratepayers with the respect we deserve. Please start serving your public with honesty and common sense. Acknowledge how well we have conserved water. Re-evaluate your water system planning and the infrastructure that you think is necessary. The SFPUC debt load is dragging our city down. If you set aside less water, your capital costs drop, and our bills do too. And — we don’t lose our salmon and our beautiful rivers.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment.

Sincerely,
2 Nancy Arbuckle
Hyde Street
San Francisco 94109
1 From: Bill <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2026 7:17 PM
To: Commission
Subject: rate increase
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Report Suspicious Dear Commissioners,
Please join me in opposing the water rate increase.

Bill Collins
1 From: Francisco Da Costa <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2026 8:24 AM
To: Commission; Joshua Arce; Chu, Carmen (ADM); Mandelman, Rafael (BOS); Lennear, Tiffany; Shepard, Alex (CON); Greg Wagner; Hossain, Ayeesha (CON); Dorsey, Matt (BOS); Robinson, Stephen D; Ritchie, Steve; [email protected]; [email protected]; joe king; Adolfo Padilla
Subject: The SFPUC meeting dated April 28, 2026 was a farce.

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious The meeting held by the SFPUC on April 28, 2026, was a farce and an open defiance to all who attended that meeting who speak Truth to Power:
https://kilamanjaro-kilamanjaro.blogspot.com/2026/04/san-francisco-public-utlities.html San Francisco had always had standards - the United Nations Charter was created here in San Francisco at the War Memorial. San Franciscans had contributed their best to the United States - today, we have crooks - stealing, cheating, lacking standards, and lying - and we will not look the other way:
1 From: SPUR Events <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2026 10:06 AM
To: Commission
Subject: Good Government Awards - two weeks away!
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

SPUR
To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

IDEAS +

ACTION FOR

A BETTER
CITY

Register Now!
The 45th Annual Good Government Awards are just around the corner. 궁궂궃궄궅궆궇권궈궉궊궋 Wednesday, May 13, 2026 | 꾷꾸꾹꾬꾺 4:00–6:30 p.m. 궼궾궽 San Francisco City Hall
蘪蘫蘮蘬蘭 Early bird pricing ends tomorrow! Don’t miss out! Don’t miss the opportunity to celebrate San Francisco's civic all-stars! 2 To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

GGA26 Honorees with Mayor
(Back left to right: Charles Drane, Jacob Ehrenberg, Ralf Ruckelshausen, Andrea Caporale, Nancy Byun Riedel, Anthony Nguyen, Dr. Luke Rodda, Ph.D. Front left to right: Rod Finetti, Teresa Young, Cindy Lin, Mayor Daniel Lurie, Rose Johns, and Shane Balanon. Not pictured, Cindy Sanchez)
Charles Drane, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Dr. Luke Rodda, Ph.D., Office of the Chief Medical Examiner CalFresh Grocery Card Team | SF Human Services Agency
Shane Balanon, Rod Finetti, Rose Johns, Cindy Lin, Teresa Young, Cindy Sanchez SFO AIOC Team | San Francisco International Airport
Andrea Caporale, Jacob Ehrenberg, Nancy Byun Riedel, Ralf Ruckelshausen We hope you’ll join us in celebrating public service at its best. 3 To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Follow SPUR
on Facebook
To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Follow SPUR
on Twitter
To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Follow SPUR
on LinkedIn
To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Follow SPUR
on Flickr
To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Follow SPUR
on Instagram
SPUR Urban Center, 654 Mission Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-4015 (415) 781-8726 | [email protected]
Change your email preferences
To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

1 From: MYR Comm Affairs Staff <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2026 8:00 AM
To: MYR Comm Affairs Staff
Subject: [INVITATION] Asian American & Pacific Islander Heritage Celebration Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious

PLEASE SHARE WITH YOUR COMMISSIONERS
Dear City Commissioners,
Happy Asian American & Pacific Islander Heritage Month! This year marks the 22nd anniversary of San Francisco's beloved citywide celebration and tradition. This year's theme is Elevating Cultures, reflecting San Francisco’s deep commitment to honoring cultural heritage, fostering understanding, and celebrating the people who make our city shine.

On behalf of Mayor Lurie you're invited to the APA Heritage Awards and Community Gala on Wednesday, May 6. For registration and ticketing, please visit apasf.org.

Be sure to check out the 100+ events featured in the Celebration Guide that the APA Foundation and their partners have produced.
1 From: David Banks <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2026 5:39 PM
To: [email protected]; Board of Supervisors (BOS); Sherrill, Stephen (BOS); Commission; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; SFPUC Citizens' Advisory Committee; Chan, Connie (BOS); Wong, Alan (BOS); Sauter, Danny (BOS); Mahmood, Bilal (BOS); Dorsey, Matt (BOS); Melgar, Myrna (BOS); Mandelman, Rafael (BOS); Fielder, Jackie (BOS); Walton, Shamann (BOS); Chen, Chyanne (BOS); Ethics Commission, (ETH); [email protected]; [email protected]; DBICUSTOMERSERVICE, DBI (DBI); [email protected]; EHS DPH (DPH); [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject:

Request to Delay Approval of Safeway Development Pending Sewer Infrastructure Remediation
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Report Suspicious I am writing as a resident/community member regarding the proposed Safeway redevelopment project in the Marina District.

Since the closure of the Pierce Street outfall in May 2021, the surrounding sewer system has experienced repeated overflow conditions during storm events. These events have resulted in the discharge of untreated sewage into residential properties. These are documented, recurring conditions with implications for public health and safety.

Under the California Environmental Quality Act, public agencies are required to evaluate all reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts of a project, including conditions involving the release of hazardous materials during upset or system failure scenarios. CEQA Guidelines further require analysis where a project may expose the public to hazards through such conditions. The existing conditions in the Marina indicate an ongoing exposure pathway associated with sewer system performance during storm events. Increasing density and wastewater load on a system already experiencing overflow conditions raises serious concerns regarding compliance with CEQA and applicable health and safety standards.

Public Resources Code §21002 provides that a project should not be approved where feasible mitigation measures are available to substantially lessen significant environmental effects. In this context, further evaluation of infrastructure capacity, system performance, and appropriate mitigation measures appears warranted prior to the introduction of additional load.

In addition, the Laguna outfall currently discharges into a proposed recreational water activities.

Where system performance during storm events results in overflow or discharge conditions, the 2 potential for impacts to recreational waters and public exposure may warrant further evaluation. This is particularly relevant in the context of environmental review and interagency coordination.

Accordingly, I respectfully request that:

Approval of the proposed Safeway development be delayed until sewer system performance during storm conditions can be fully evaluated.

A comprehensive review be conducted of cumulative impacts related to existing infrastructure limitations and projected increases in wastewater load.

Any project approval be conditioned on demonstrated measures that address system performance and reduce the potential for overflow-related impacts affecting residential areas, public rights-of-way, and recreational waters.

This request is not an opposition to development, but a request that development proceed in a manner consistent with environmental review requirements and established health and safety standards.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Please review all newsletters

April 23rd 2026
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://us18.admin.mailchimp.com/campaigns/wizard/neapolitan?id=1405 5492__;!!NCYPjq8!9yiE8dSGNdu7aM2_Lc8sX3rSPVyU3DBeuEX8wbdyxaQMNyNrFCg8VLX_lyAMC J4wCJw_ThkkBX0pYe7joMhN$

Wed, Jan 11, 2023
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailchi.mp/043f27535c86/city-closes-pierce-st- outfall__;!!NCYPjq8!9yiE8dSGNdu7aM2_Lc8sX3rSPVyU3DBeuEX8wbdyxaQMNyNrFCg8VLX_lyAM CJ4wCJw_ThkkBX0pYbstxBRM$

Mon, Mar 31, 2025
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailchi.mp/8684f12e50b1/city-closes-pierce-st-outfall- 14052929__;!!NCYPjq8!9yiE8dSGNdu7aM2_Lc8sX3rSPVyU3DBeuEX8wbdyxaQMNyNrFCg8VLX_ly AMCJ4wCJw_ThkkBX0pYQLr88Wa$
1 From: Sheila Dowell <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2026 8:01 PM
To: [email protected]; Board of Supervisors (BOS); Sherrill, Stephen (BOS); Commission; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; SFPUC Citizens' Advisory Committee; Chan, Connie (BOS); Wong, Alan (BOS); Sauter, Danny (BOS); Mahmood, Bilal (BOS); Dorsey, Matt (BOS); Melgar, Myrna (BOS); Mandelman, Rafael (BOS); Fielder, Jackie (BOS); Walton, Shamann (BOS); Chen, Chyanne (BOS); Ethics Commission, (ETH); [email protected]; [email protected]; DBICUSTOMERSERVICE, DBI (DBI); [email protected]; EHS DPH (DPH); [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject:

Request to Delay Approval of Safeway Development Pending Sewer Infrastructure Remediation
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Report Suspicious I am writing as a resident/community member regarding the proposed Safeway redevelopment project in the Marina District.

Since the closure of the Pierce Street outfall in May 2021, the surrounding sewer system has experienced repeated overflow conditions during storm events. These events have resulted in the discharge of untreated sewage into residential properties. These are documented, recurring conditions with implications for public health and safety.

Under the California Environmental Quality Act, public agencies are required to evaluate all reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts of a project, including conditions involving the release of hazardous materials during upset or system failure scenarios. CEQA Guidelines further require analysis where a project may expose the public to hazards through such conditions. The existing conditions in the Marina indicate an ongoing exposure pathway associated with sewer system performance during storm events. Increasing density and wastewater load on a system already experiencing overflow conditions raises serious concerns regarding compliance with CEQA and applicable health and safety standards.

Public Resources Code §21002 provides that a project should not be approved where feasible mitigation measures are available to substantially lessen significant environmental effects. In this context, further evaluation of infrastructure capacity, system performance, and appropriate mitigation measures appears warranted prior to the introduction of additional load.

In addition, the Laguna outfall currently discharges into a proposed recreational water activities.

Where system performance during storm events results in overflow or discharge conditions, the 2 potential for impacts to recreational waters and public exposure may warrant further evaluation. This is particularly relevant in the context of environmental review and interagency coordination.

Accordingly, I respectfully request that:

Approval of the proposed Safeway development be delayed until sewer system performance during storm conditions can be fully evaluated.

A comprehensive review be conducted of cumulative impacts related to existing infrastructure limitations and projected increases in wastewater load.

Any project approval be conditioned on demonstrated measures that address system performance and reduce the potential for overflow-related impacts affecting residential areas, public rights-of-way, and recreational waters.

This request is not an opposition to development, but a request that development proceed in a manner consistent with environmental review requirements and established health and safety standards.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Sheila Dowell

Please review all newsletters

April 23rd 2026
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://us18.admin.mailchimp.com/campaigns/wizard/neapolitan?id=1405 5492__;!!NCYPjq8!5w3YKt_uvp0HOU13801pa8wl1EQtrfj239YS8Dti9YHDlEQK09ud3ltPt2OcDxMwip AFr24OhzjnY6G9R6ztZF9eTg$

Wed, Jan 11, 2023
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailchi.mp/043f27535c86/city-closes-pierce-st- outfall__;!!NCYPjq8!5w3YKt_uvp0HOU13801pa8wl1EQtrfj239YS8Dti9YHDlEQK09ud3ltPt2OcDxMwi pAFr24OhzjnY6G9R6yMNlHADA$

Mon, Mar 31, 2025
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailchi.mp/8684f12e50b1/city-closes-pierce-st-outfall- 14052929__;!!NCYPjq8!5w3YKt_uvp0HOU13801pa8wl1EQtrfj239YS8Dti9YHDlEQK09ud3ltPt2OcDx MwipAFr24OhzjnY6G9R6wVbfrjyg$
1 From: Francisco Da Costa <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2026 10:19 AM
To: Francisco Da Costa
Subject: San Francisco Public Utilities Commission has failed us all - time for drastic changes.

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious SFPUC has failed us all:
https://kilamanjaro-kilamanjaro.blogspot.com/2026/05/the-core-problem-with-san-francisco.html Francisco Da Costa
Director
Environmental Justice Advocacy
1 From: Julie Sante <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2026 10:54 AM
To: [email protected]; Board of Supervisors (BOS); Sherrill, Stephen (BOS); Commission; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; SFPUC Citizens' Advisory Committee; Chan, Connie (BOS); Wong, Alan (BOS); Sauter, Danny (BOS); Mahmood, Bilal (BOS); Dorsey, Matt (BOS); Melgar, Myrna (BOS); Mandelman, Rafael (BOS); Fielder, Jackie (BOS); Walton, Shamann (BOS); Chen, Chyanne (BOS); Ethics Commission, (ETH); [email protected]; [email protected]; DBICUSTOMERSERVICE, DBI (DBI); [email protected]; EHS DPH (DPH); [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject:

Request to Delay Approval of Safeway Development Pending Sewer Infrastructure Remediation
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Report Suspicious I am writing as a resident/community member regarding the proposed Safeway redevelopment project in the Marina District.

Since the closure of the Pierce Street outfall in May 2021, the surrounding sewer system has experienced repeated overflow conditions during storm events. These events have resulted in the discharge of untreated sewage into residential properties. These are documented, recurring conditions with implications for public health and safety.

Under the California Environmental Quality Act, public agencies are required to evaluate all reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts of a project, including conditions involving the release of hazardous materials during upset or system failure scenarios. CEQA Guidelines further require analysis where a project may expose the public to hazards through such conditions. The existing conditions in the Marina indicate an ongoing exposure pathway associated with sewer system performance during storm events.

Increasing density and wastewater load on a system already experiencing overflow conditions raises serious concerns regarding compliance with CEQA and applicable health and safety standards.

Public Resources Code §21002 provides that a project should not be approved where feasible mitigation measures are available to substantially lessen significant environmental effects. In this context, further evaluation of infrastructure capacity, system performance, and appropriate mitigation measures appears warranted prior to the introduction of additional load.

In addition, the Laguna outfall currently discharges into a proposed recreational water activities. Where system performance during storm events results in overflow or discharge conditions, the potential for 2 impacts to recreational waters and public exposure may warrant further evaluation. This is particularly relevant in the context of environmental review and interagency coordination.

Accordingly, I respectfully request that:

Approval of the proposed Safeway development be delayed until sewer system performance during storm conditions can be fully evaluated.

A comprehensive review be conducted of cumulative impacts related to existing infrastructure limitations and projected increases in wastewater load.

Any project approval be conditioned on demonstrated measures that address system performance and reduce the potential for overflow-related impacts affecting residential areas, public rights-of-way, and recreational waters.

This request is not an opposition to development, but a request that development proceed in a manner consistent with environmental review requirements and established health and safety standards.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Julie Sante
Please review all newsletters

April 23rd 2026
https://us18.admin.mailchimp.com/campaigns/wizard/neapolitan?id=14055492

Wed, Jan 11, 2023
https://mailchi.mp/043f27535c86/city-closes-pierce-st-outfall

Mon, Mar 31, 2025
https://mailchi.mp/8684f12e50b1/city-closes-pierce-st-outfall-14052929

1 From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2026 5:02 PM
To: ChenStaff
Cc: [email protected]; SherrillStaff; SauterStaff; WongStaff (BOS); MahmoodStaff; DorseyStaff (BOS); MelgarStaff (BOS); MandelmanStaff (BOS); FielderStaff; Waltonstaff (BOS); ChanStaff (BOS); [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Herrera, David; Commission; John-Baptiste, Alicia (MYR); Madland, Sarah (REC)
Subject: Re: Crocker Amazon Playground
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious Dear Supervisor Chen:

A Citywide park recreation survey several years ago asked participants to rank 20 choices of what they wanted. The top one was walking in nature, and last place was playing baseball.

People in the Marina District expressed their opposition to boat slips being placed across from their homes, and the Board of Supervisors immediately jumped to do their bidding, and made the change. Just imagine if six fenced iartificial turf baseball diamonds were proposed to be installed on Marina Green—the immediate outcry would instantly cancel the project.

People in the Crocker Amazon and Excelsior Neighborhoods have clearly expressed their wish to keep a natural Crocker Amazon Park, keeping the trees and real grass with no additional fencing, but the Park and Recreation Department evades and avoids acknowledging and acting on these clear wishes, and continues to steam roll over what the people want, instead
Imposing a publicity stunt vanity project that is opposed, and not wanted or needed.

WHAT DO DISTRICT 11 PEOPLE HAVE TO DO TO RECEIVE EQUAL TREATMENT WITH MARINA DISTRICT PEOPLE???? WE ***DEMAND*** THAT YOU CANCEL THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF ARTIFICIAL TURF

AND PROPOSED KILLING OF THE MATURE TREES, AND INSTEAD PROVIDE PROPER REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE FOR OUR EXISTING BEAUTIFUL NATURAL PARK.

Sincerely,
Your Constituent,
Valerie Howard
`
2 1
From: MYR Comm Affairs Staff <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 1:14 PM
Subject: [INVITATION] Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Unity Photo This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious

PLEASE SHARE WITH YOUR COMMISSIONERS
Mayor Daniel Lurie requests the pleasure of your company at a City Hall unity photo in honor of Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month.

Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Unity Photo Date: Monday, May 11, 2026
Time: 4:30 PM, please arrive by 4:15 PM to begin blocking Location: City Hall Rotunda, Grand Staircase
We encourage all self-identifying elected officials, commissioners, department heads, and city staff to join this celebratory photo. As we honor and recognize the contributions, achievements, and lasting impact of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders to our communities and workforce. Please join us in celebration of Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month.

Please register to help us plan for the scale of the photo: https://forms.cloud.microsoft/g/5m2qjafPG2 1 From: Jennifer M. Land <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 12:26 PM
To: 'Robert Frobose'; '[email protected]'; 'Michael Frantz'; 'Glenn Spyksma' Cc: 'Mike Weststeyn'; '[email protected]'; 'Joe Alamo'; Andree Lee; Jimi Netniss; 'Angela Cartisano'; 'Laura Isleib'; Herrera, Dennis J; Lennear, Tiffany; Feitelberg, Brittany K; Flynn, Ronald P; Aguas, Valerie; Brad A. Koehn; Ashley Millsap; Peter Rietkerk; Danielle Barney; '[email protected]'; Arthur Godwin; Valerie Kincaid; 'Mia Brown'; Bill Paris; WHIPPS, NICHOLAS (CAT)
Subject: SJTA Commission Regular Meeting Agenda Packet - May 11 at 10 a.m.

Attachments: 051126 SJTA Commission Meeting Agenda Packet.pdf Importance: High
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious Good afternoon Commissioners,
Attached please find the agenda packet for the upcoming regular meeting of the SJTA Commission scheduled for Monday, May 11 at 10:00 a.m.

This meeting will be held in the TID Board Room located at 333 E Canal Drive, Turlock. Commissioner Stacy will be absent from the meeting; however, all other Commissioners will be attending in-person.

Confidential communication pertaining to closed session matters will be provided under separate cover prior to the meeting.

Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can be of any assistance.

Thank you,
Jennifer Land
Board & Administrative Services Manager
Turlock Irrigation District | 333 East Canal Drive | P.O. Box 949 |Turlock, CA 95381 Direct: (209) 883-8353
[email protected] | www.TID.org

COMMISSION MEETING OF THE

SAN JOAQUIN TRIBUTARIES AUTHORITY

MONDAY, MAY 11, 2026 – 10:00 A.M.

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT
333 E. CANAL DRIVE
BOARD ROOM 105
TURLOCK, CA 95380

ALTERNATE FORMATS OF THIS AGENDA WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST TO QUALIFIED INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES. PERSONS WHO REQUIRE A DISABILITY-

RELATED MODIFICATION OR ACCOMMODATION, INCLUDING AUXILIARY AIDS OR

SERVICES, SHOULD CONTACT JENNIFER LAND, COMMISSION SECRETARY, IN PERSON OR BY MAIL, AT THE ABOVE (TID) ADDRESS, OR BY TELEPHONE AT (209) 883-8353, NOT LESS THAN 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING FOR WHICH THE MODIFICATION OR ACCOMMODATION IS REQUIRED.

1. CALL TO ORDER

Members of the public will have the opportunity to provide public input in-person or via the webinar or phone features. If you wish to speak, click on the “Raise Hand” button via Zoom, or press *9 if using a phone, and wait until your name (or other identifying information) is called by the Commission Secretary.

To join the meeting:
- Click here to join the video meeting
- Or to join by phone, please dial 669-900-9128 or 346-248-7799 Meeting ID: 960 8572 8844

2. SALUTE TO THE FLAG

3. ROLL CALL OF COMMISSIONERS

4. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (5 minutes per speaker)
This time is provided for the public to address the Commissioners of the Authority on matters of concern that fall within the jurisdiction of the Authority that are not on the agenda. Speakers are encouraged to consult Member Management or Directors prior to agenda preparation regarding any Authority operation or responsibility as no action will be taken on non-agenda issues.

5. MOTION TO APPROVE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 9, 2026

6. MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TREASURER’S REPORT
Presentation and acceptance of the Treasurer’s Report through April 30, 2026. - Ashley Millsap, SJTA Treasurer

7. PHASE 2 STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM
Update on the Phase 2 Strategic Communications Program. - Andree Lee, SJTA Executive Director

8. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
Update on the Strategic Plan implementation and SJTA activities. - Andree Lee, SJTA Executive Director

9. MOTION TO ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION

A. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
California Government Code Section 54956.9
San Joaquin Tributaries Authority, et al vs. California State Water Resources Control Board
Tuolumne County Superior Court – Case Number CV62094
Judicial Council Coordinated Proceeding No.5013
- Valerie Kincaid, Legal Counsel

B. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
California Government Code Section 54956.9
San Joaquin Tributaries Authority vs. California State Water Resources Control Board
Fresno County Superior Court – Case No. 21CECG02632
Judicial Council Coordinated Proceeding No. 5229
- Valerie Kincaid, Legal Counsel

C. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
California Government Code Section 54956.9
San Joaquin Tributaries Authority, et al vs. California State Water Resources Control Board
Fresno County Superior Court – Case No. 23CECG04201
- Valerie Kincaid, Legal Counsel

D. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)-(3)
Anticipated Litigation – one potential case
Potential future State Water Board Action
- Valerie Kincaid, Legal Counsel

10. RECONVENE - REPORT OF ANY ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION

11. MATTERS TOO LATE FOR THE AGENDA

12. NEXT REGULAR MEETING DATE - MONDAY, AUGUST 10, 2026 AT 10:00 A.M.

13. MOTION TO ADJOURN

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING

OF THE SAN JOAQUIN TRIBUTARIES AUTHORITY

Turlock, California
9 February 2026

The Commission Meeting of the San Joaquin Tributaries Authority was called to order at 10:02 a.m. in regular session on the 9th day of February 2026, conducted in-person from the Turlock Irrigation District located at 333 E. Canal Drive, Turlock, CA, via Zoom Webinar, and the remote teleconference location as described on the agenda.

Present were the following representatives of the member agencies:

Michael Frantz – Turlock Irrigation District
Kate Stacy – City and County of San Francisco
Robert Frobose – Modesto Irrigation District, Vice Chair (remote teleconference) Glenn Spyksma – South San Joaquin Irrigation District, Chair

PUBLIC COMMENT

There were no comments from the public.

MOTION APPOINTING THE CHAIR

Commissioner Spyksma expressed appreciation for his time serving as Chair, provided information regarding the rotation of officers noting that Commissioner Frobose is next in line for the Chair role, and thanked Executive Director Lee and the General Managers for their work.

Commissioners thanked Commissioner Spyksma for his leadership and service as Chair.

Moved by Commissioner Stacy, seconded by Commissioner Frantz, that the Modesto Irrigation District member Robert Frobose is hereby appointed as Chair of the San Joaquin Tributaries Authority for a term of two (2) years.

Upon roll call the following vote was had:

Ayes: Commissioners Frantz, Stacy, Frobose, and Spyksma Noes: None

Absent: None

All voted in favor with none opposed. The Chair declared the motion carried.

MOTION APPOINTING THE VICE CHAIR

Moved by Commissioner Frantz, seconded by Commissioner Frobose, that the City & County of San Francisco member Kate Stacy is hereby appointed as Vice Chair of the San Joaquin Tributaries Authority for a term of two (2) years,

Upon roll call the following vote was had:

Ayes: Commissioners Frantz, Stacy, Frobose, and Spyksma Noes: None

Absent: None

All voted in favor with none opposed. The Chair declared the motion carried.

MOTION APPOINTING THE SECRETARY

Commissioners Frantz and Stacy spoke favorably about Turlock Irrigation District employee Jennifer Land serving as Secretary.

Moved by Commissioner Frantz, seconded by Commissioner Stacy, that the Turlock Irrigation District employee Jennifer Land is hereby appointed as Secretary of the San Joaquin Tributaries Authority for a term of two (2) years.

Upon roll call the following vote was had:

Ayes: Commissioners Frantz, Stacy, Frobose, and Spyksma Noes: None

Absent: None

All voted in favor with none opposed. The Chair declared the motion carried.

MOTION APPOINTING THE TREASURER

Commissioner Frantz spoke favorably about Turlock Irrigation District employee Ashley Millsap serving as Treasurer.

Moved by Commissioner Frantz, seconded by Commissioner Stacy, that the Turlock Irrigation District employee Ashley Millsap is hereby appointed as Treasurer of the San Joaquin Tributaries Authority for a term of two (2) years.

Upon roll call the following vote was had:

Ayes: Commissioners Frantz, Stacy, Frobose, and Spyksma Noes: None

Absent: None

All voted in favor with none opposed. The Chair declared the motion carried.

MOTION APPROVING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES

Moved by Commissioner Stacy, seconded by Commissioner Frobose, that the minutes of the regular meeting of November 3, 2025, be approved as presented.

Upon roll call the following vote was had:

Ayes: Commissioners Frantz, Stacy, Frobose, and Spyksma Noes: None

Absent: None

All voted in favor with none opposed. The Chair declared the motion carried.

MOTION APPROVING TREASURER’S REPORT

SJTA Treasurer Ashley Millsap presented the Treasurer’s Report with activity through December 31, 2025, including interest earned, total expenditures, carryover, and cash reconciliations for the money market and checking accounts.

Moved by Commissioner Frantz, seconded by Commissioner Stacy, that the Treasurer’s Report with activity through December 31, 2025, be approved as presented.

Upon roll call the following vote was had:

Ayes: Commissioners Frantz, Stacy, Frobose, and Spyksma Noes: None

Absent: None

All voted in favor with none opposed. The Chair declared the motion carried.

MOTION ADJOURNING TO CLOSED SESSION

Moved by Commissioner Frantz, seconded by Commissioner Stacy, that the Commission meeting be adjourned to closed session at 10:13 a.m.:

A. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
California Government Code Section 54956.9
San Joaquin Tributaries Authority, et al vs. California State Water Resources Control Board
Tuolumne County Superior Court – Case Number CV62094
Judicial Council Coordinated Proceeding No.5013
- Valerie Kincaid, Legal Counsel

B. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
California Government Code Section 54956.9
San Joaquin Tributaries Authority vs. California State Water Resources Control Board
Fresno County Superior Court – Case No. 21CECG02632
Judicial Council Coordinated Proceeding No. 5229
- Valerie Kincaid, Legal Counsel

C. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
California Government Code Section 54956.9
San Joaquin Tributaries Authority, et al vs. California State Water Resources Control Board
Fresno County Superior Court – Case No. 23CECG04201
- Valerie Kincaid, Legal Counsel

D. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)-(3)
Anticipated Litigation – one potential case
Potential future State Water Board Action
- Valerie Kincaid, Legal Counsel

RECOVENE – REPORT OF ANY ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION

The Commission meeting was reconvened in open session at 11:27 a.m. with all Commissioners present as per the previous open session. Legal Counsel Valerie Kincaid reported that the Commission provided direction to file an Amicus Brief in the matter of Bring Back the Kern.

This action was approved by a 3/1 vote with the Modesto Irrigation District absent during this portion of the meeting.

MOTION AUTHORIZING PHASE 2 STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION

SJTA Executive Director Andree Lee presented an overview of the Strategic Communications Program Phase 2, including the background and approach, scope of work, and the consultant selection process. She reported that the Communications Working Group recommends selecting Evoque Communications, reviewed the proposed 11-month schedule, and noted the recommendation is consistent with the approved budget.

Commissioners expressed support and appreciation for the work completed to date and commented that potentially conducting a follow-up survey would be valuable to determine whether the efforts moved the needle and that the analytics would help measure success.

Hearing no further comments, the Commission took the following action:

Moved by Commissioner Frobose, seconded by Commissioner Frantz, authorizing the Executive Director to negotiate and execute contracts with Evoque Communications and media

vendors for an amount not to exceed $249,990 for Phase 2 Strategic Communications Program implementation.

Upon roll call the following vote was had:

Ayes: Commissioners Frantz, Stacy, Frobose, and Spyksma Noes: None

Absent: None

All voted in favor with none opposed. The Chair declared the resolution adopted.

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT

SJTA Executive Director Andree Lee reported that the new branding has been completed and the new website has launched. She also noted that they have been coordinating closely with the Department of Water Resources on watershed studies for the San Joaquin River System, whose overall goals align with the work being done by the SJTA agencies. The goal is to identify partnerships on shared objectives and to leverage potential funding opportunities for pilot projects.

MATTERS TOO LATE FOR THE AGENDA

There were none.

FUTURE MEETING

The next regular meeting is scheduled for Monday, May 11, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business, moved by Commissioner Stacy, seconded by Commissioner Frantz, that the meeting be adjourned at 11:34 a.m.

All voted in favor with none opposed. The Chair declared the motion carried.

Secretary to the Commission of the

SAN JOAQUIN TRIBUTARIES AUTHORITY

MEMORANDUM
To: San Joaquin Tributaries Authority
From: SJTA Treasurer, Ashley Millsap
Issue: Motion to Accept Treasurer’s Report
Date: May 11, 2026
Attached (or below) please find the Treasurer’s Report with activity through April 30, 2026.
2026 Actual v. Budget
YTD as of April 30, 2026
% of 2025
2026 Budget 2025 YTD ActualBudget VarianceBudget YTD
Revenue
Agencies Cash Call 1,412,000.00$ 1,412,000.00$ -$ Interest Earned/Received -$ 4,465.21$ 4,465.21$ Carryover 817,256.03$ 817,256.03$ -$
Total Revenue 2,229,256.03$ 2,233,721.24$ 4,465.21$ Expenditures
Executive Director 298,288.00$ 52,413.38$ (245,874.62)$ 18% Administrative Costs 418,600.00$ 37,562.30$ (381,037.70)$ 9% Legal Costs 935,125.00$ 249,767.00$ (685,358.00)$ 27% Total Expenditures 1,652,013.00$ 339,742.68$ (1,312,270.32)$ 21% Revenue over Expenditures 577,243.03$ 1,893,978.56$ 1,316,735.53$ -$

Cash Reconciliation for Money Market Account
Balance as of 12/31/25: 928,175.94 $
Receipts:
-$ Cash Call ()
4,465.21$ Interest
4,465.21$ 4,465.21 $
Disbursements:
(400,000.00)$ Transfer
(400,000.00)$ (400,000.00) $
Balance as of 04/30/26: Total Cash Balance: 532,641.15$

Cash Reconciliation for Checking Account
Balance as of 12/31/25: 72,053.25 $
Receipts:
1,412,000.00$ Cash Call ()
400,000.00$ Transfer
1,812,000.00$ 1,812,000.00$
Disbursements:
102.30$ Deluxe Business Systems
10,545.00$ Chris Nance
104,611.54$ EKI Environment & Water
164,229.00$ Paris Kincaid Wasiewski LLP
17,340.00$ The Harris Poll
8,093.75$ EVOQUE
9,200.00$ Planeteria Media
314,121.59$ (314,121.59) $
Checking Balance as of 04/30/2026:1,569,931.66$
Outstanding Disbursements
9,972.30$ EKI Environment & Water
13,106.25$ EVOQUE
169,183.00$ Paris Kincaid Wasiewski LLP
2,500.00$ CSU Fresno
194,761.55$ (194,761.55) $
Total Adjusted Checking Balance:1,375,170.11$
Total Money Market Balance: 532,641.15$
Total Cash Balance as of 04/30/2026:1,907,811.26$

MEMORANDUM
To: San Joaquin Tributaries Authority
From: SJTA Executive Director, Andree Lee
Issue: Update on Phase 2 Strategic Communications Program Date: May 11, 2026

This memorandum provides an update on the San Joaquin Tributaries Authority (SJTA) Strategic Communications Program (Program) Phase 2 implementation.

Background

SJTA’s Strategic Plan includes two goals related to communications: a “One Voice” goal to elevate the identity and effectiveness of SJTA by developing a unified voice, and a “Tell the Story” goal to increase awareness and understanding of the widespread benefits from the water systems and resources managed by SJTA members, positioning SJTA as a critical partner and information source around water and power operations and resources management.

In February 2026, the Commission authorized SJTA to contract with Evoque Communications (Consultant Team) and execute media buys to implement Phase 2 of the Program. Phase 2 focuses on implementation of the media plan and targeted outreach, including paid media and preparation of earned media materials. Phase 2 messaging will address three primary topic areas: educating customers on their sources of water; highlighting how SJTA agencies support customers' daily living needs; and highlighting the benefits of SJTA agencies' projects and partnerships to sustain both the environment and customers' quality of life.

Phase 2 Progress

Progress to date on Phase 2 includes:
 Phase 2 Communications Plan and Brand Style Guide. The Consultant Team, with input from the SJTA Communications Working Group (CWG), delivered the Phase 2 Strategic Communications Plan (Plan), which establishes three overarching program goals: (1) establish SJTA and the member agencies as trusted leaders in science-based water management and regional water resilience; (2) increase policymakers' and customers' understanding of regional water systems and investments; and (3) secure support for collaborative, multi-

benefit projects and approaches. The Plan includes measurable objectives for each goal.
 Initial Campaign Development. The Consultant Team has developed the initial campaign concept, focused on Communications Plan Goal #1: building awareness and trust of SJTA and its member agencies. The campaign strategy centers on introducing target audiences to SJTA and its member agencies through trusted spokespersons identified by the CWG.
 Spokesperson Filming. Filming is scheduled for May 12–14, 2026 at selected Central Valley locations identified by the member agencies, including reservoirs, habitat restoration areas, and water treatment plants.

Next Steps

The initial campaign will launch in June 2026. The campaign will focus on building awareness and trust of SJTA and its member agencies, using short-format videos for social media and TV, and longer 1–2 minute videos for websites and YouTube. The paid media plan will deploy across multiple channels, including Meta, Google Ads, local/streaming TV (Comcast/Tegna), connected TV and talk radio (iHeart Media), billboards (Clear Channel/Lamar), transit ads (Outfront Media), and print/online newspaper ads, with media buys targeting demographics identified as most persuadable in the Phase 1 public poll.

Paid media implementation and earned media and targeted outreach support are planned for June through October. The final summary report will be developed in November, with all work to be completed by December 31, 2026. Updates on campaign progress, metrics, and results will be provided at each quarterly Commission meeting.

Action Requested

This memorandum is provided for the Commission's information. No action is requested at this time.

April 7, 2026

The Honorable Diane Papan
Chair, Committee on Water, Parks, and Wildlife
1020 N Street, Suite 160
Sacramento, CA 95814

RE: AB 2026 (Aguiar-Curry) – Groundwater Recharge – OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED Hearing Date: April 14, 2026 – Committee on Water, Parks, and Wildlife

Dear Chair Papan,
On behalf of the San Joaquin Tributaries Authority (SJTA) , I a m w r i t i n g t o e x p r e s s a n O p p o s e U n l e s s Amended position on AB 2026. While SJTA shares the author’s goal of expanding groundwater recharge— a critical component of regional sustainability and Sustainable Groundwater Management Act ( SGMA) compliance—we are concerned that the bill’s current framework would inadvertently create new restrictions that limit recharge opportunities along the San Joaquin River and its tributaries, particularly the Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers.

SJTA is comprised of major urban and agricultural water suppliers – Modesto Irrigation District, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, South San Joaquin Irrigation District, and Turlock Irrigation District - that collectively serve approximately 260,000 acres of irrigated farmland and 3.2 million residents across the San Joaquin Valley and the San Francisco Bay Area. Our members are actively advancing science-driven strategies to support resilient communities, ecosystem health, and sustainable groundwater management in the face of climate uncertainty, including piloting recharge efforts in partnership with the Department of Water Resources (DWR) and others. However, for AB 2026 to effectively support local agency efforts without compromising existing operations or water rights, the following areas must be addressed:
• Delta Restriction Language: The current draft would eliminate upstream recharge opportunities based on Central Valley Project and State Water Project operations in the Delta. These limitations could curtail the ability of upstream agencies to divert high -flow water for recharge, even when such diversions do not impact Delta water quality or senior water right holders. • Reliance on the Coordinated Operations Agreement (COA): The bill’s reference to the COA between DWR and the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) is problematic. The COA is a dynamic administrative agreement subject to periodic renegotiation. Hard -coding a reliance on this document into statute creates long -term regulat ory uncertainty for local agencies whose investments in recharge infrastructure require a stable legal environment. • Mandatory Agreements with DWR or BOR: AB 2026 suggests that local agencies must reach specific agreements with DWR or BOR prior to certain recharge activities. This requirement adds a burdensome layer of state oversight that can stall projects during narrow windows of

opportunity when flood flows are available. Local control and existing water right priorities should remain the primary drivers of these programs.
• Flood Flow Definitions and FIRO Integration: We are particularly concerned with the definition of "flood flow" below a dam. The bill’s use of the vague term "soon" when defining "imminent" regarding flood releases creates significant ambiguity. This phrasing could undermine Forecast - Informed Reservo ir Operations (FIRO). FIRO relies on precise meteorological data to manage storage; vague statutory language could limit our flexibility to capture water earlier in a storm cycle, effectively harming our ability to maximize both public safety and groundwater replenishment.

SJTA respectfully requests that AB 2026 be amended to provide greater clarity on these points and to ensure that new regulations do not supersede the seniority of existing water rights or the technical success of FIRO programs.

For these reasons, the SJTA must oppose AB 2026 unless amended. Should you have any questions, please contact me at SJTA’s Executive Director at [email protected] or (650) 781-7127 .

Sincerely,

Andree Lee
Executive Director

CC: Jimi Netniss, General Manager, Modesto Irrigation District Dennis Herrera, General Manager, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Peter Rietkerk, General Manager, South San Joaquin Irrigation District Brad Koehn, General Manager, Turlock Irrigation District

← All documents from this meeting