525 Golden Gate Ave.
San Francisco, CA 94102
T 415.55
1.4720
TTY 415.554.3488
[email protected]
June 9, 2026
Ms.
Angela Calvillo
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
City Hall, Room 244
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102-4689
RE:
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission’s Quarterly Report to the Board of Supervisors on the Status of Applications to PG&E for Electric Service.
Dea
r Ms. Calvillo:
The at
tached quarterly report was initially prepared for the Board of Supervisors (Board) in accordance with Resolution No. 227-18, approved by the Board on July 10, 2018 (File No. 180693), adopted on July 20, 2018, and re- affirmed on April 6, 2021. The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) continues to report on these issues to the Board due to Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s (PG&E) ongoing obstruction of City projects.
This report provides the status of City projects with applications to SFPUC for electric service that face obstacles from PG&E that could increase costs or delay service to City customers, and the status of disputes with PG&E before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) or in other forums.
HIG
HLIGHTS IN THIS QUARTER’S REPORT
• 83 active projects have experienced interconnection delays or increased project costs due to PG&E’s obstruction. o 2 projects were added
• Total cost impact (additional project costs and loss of revenue to the City) of PG&E’s obstructions since the first report submitted in November 2018 is approximately $74M. o The total cost impact to the City for the 83 projects featured in this quarter’s report is more than $50M. • FERC approved a settlement agreement between the City and PG&E on a set of issues related to PG&E’s Wholesale Distribution Tariff on November 6, 2025.
o FERC issued a favorable decision on two issues not included in the settlement on October 27, 2025. o FERC denied PG&E’s Request for Rehearing on Direct Assigned Facilities on April 16, 2026. • PG&E filed further tariff changes (WDT4) on October 25, 2024, which took effect May 25, 2025. o The City, other Joint Intervenors, and PG&E have reached settlement in principle on this matter. • San Francisco’s Valuation petition at the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is ongoing. The City filed its amended and restated testimony on April 20, 2026. PG&E’s opening testimony is due in October.
Should you have any questions about this report, please contact Barbara Hale, SFPUC Assistant General Manager, Power, at [email protected] and 415-613-6341.
Sincerely,
Dennis J. Herrera
General Manager
OUR MISSION: To provide our customers with high-quality, efficient and reliable water, power and sewer services in a manner
that values environmental and community interests and sustains the resources entrusted to our care.
1 June 2026 Q UARTERLY REPORT
(Updates from March 2026 through May 2026)
I. Ba
ckground
The
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) provides retail electric service from our Hetch Hetchy Power publicly-owned utility (Hetchy) to approximately 9,000 customer accounts by relying on our Hetch Hetchy generation and other sources for supply. The City and County of San Francisco (City) pays Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) about $64 million per year to provide transmission and wholesale distribution services regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
PG&E’s Transmission Owner (TO) Tariff and Wholesale Distribution Tariff (WDT) describe the terms and conditions of these purchased services. In September 2020, PG&E filed an update to the WDT (WDT3), that significantly decreased the City’s ability to serve many City projects. PG&E and the City reached agreement on some of the disputed issues in this proceeding in a settlement that was approved by the Board of Supervisors in Ordinance 80-25 and then by FERC and became effective on November 6, 2025. On November 13, 2025, the City and PG&E began discussions on a new Transmission Interconnection Agreement under the TO Tariff and the WDT Interconnection Agreement which were set to expire July 2025, but PG&E extended until June 30, 2026. PG&E submitted these renewals on May 20, 2026 with an effective date of July 1, 2026. The City discussed changes to these agreements with PG&E and does not oppose the 10-year renewals. Regardless of instances of working with PG&E to resolve issues, PG&E continues to obstruct City projects with costly and unnecessary requirements, large unsubstantiated true-up costs, and delays necessitating on-going disputes and litigation. In addition to continuing efforts to fight for fair access to the grid in the near term, the City is seeking to purchase the PG&E-owned electric grid within San Francisco. This will allow San Francisco to expand the City’s full- service publicly owned electric utility and eliminate our dependence on PG&E for electric service within the City.
1. Cu
rrent Status of Projects Facing PG&E Obstruction
Si
nce November 2018, 189 projects have been obstructed by PG&E, including one new project this quarter.
Please find attached the following documents related to this report. • At
tachment A1, Projects with Active Applications lists the 33 projects that have experienced interconnection delays, arbitrary requests for additional and/or unnecessary information, or increased project costs for the reporting period of March 2026 to May 2026. Updates and changes to projects since the previous quarterly report are detailed in Column O of Attachment A1. • Attachment A2, Projects Released for Retail PG&E Service under WDT3 and WDT4 lists the 50 City projects that were forced to get PG&E retail service due to PG&E's requirements or outrageous costs. These projects will pay higher PG&E retail rates for electric service. • Attachment B, Map of Interconnection Issues contains a map providing the location of each project, marked with an icon indicating the type of service provided. • Attachment C, Cost Impacts contains a detailed report of each category of additional incurred costs and impacts to the City per project, such as redesign costs, construction and equipment costs, and additional staff time (these costs and impacts are also included in the ‘Impacts’ column of Attachment A1 and A2).
2 II. On
going PG&E Protests and Litigation
1. WD
T3 Litigation
PG
&E’s WDT3 filing eliminated service that the City has historically used to provide important City services. More specifically, PG&E required primary voltage service for all new or modified interconnections. Primary voltage equipment is large and expensive and is normally required for large developments. This requirement forces projects to either incur additional costs and lose usable project space to install unnecessary equipment or take service from PG&E as a retail customer instead of from Hetchy. The main issues in the table below were litigated at FERC in the WDT3 proceeding. On May 17, 2024, a
FERC Administrative Law Judge issued a favorable partial initial decision on the City’s protest over PG&E’s proposed costs for Upgrades and direct assignment facilities (issues 4 and 5 in the table be
low). The initial decision found that PG&E’s treatment of the costs of Upgrades to the distribution system and direct assignment facilities used by the City under the WDT is unjust, unreasonable, and unduly discriminatory. FERC issued a final decision affirming the initial decision. PG&E filed a Request for Rehearing on November 17, 2025. On April 16, 2026, FERC officially denied PG&E’s Request for Rehearing and continued to find PG&E’s treatment of direct assignment facilities “unjust, unreasonable and unduly discriminatory. Additionally, FERC concurred with and confirmed the City’s understanding o
f the definition of direct assignment facilities. As required by the FERC final decision, PG&E filed a Compliance Filing on December 15, 2025. This Compliance Filing failed to comply with FERC’s order a
nd embedded the costs of Upgrades into the WDT rates. The City protested this filing on January 5, 2026. F
ERC has yet to accept this Compliance Filing—there is no timeline for this. To preserve its right to appeal, PG&E had filed a Petition to Review at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. However, PG&E filed an unopposed motion to withdraw this appeal on May 20, 2026.
T
he City and PG&E reached a limited settlement agreement regarding the treatment of certain secondary vol
tage requests (issues 1-3 in the table below), requiring the City to pay a “Black Box Settlement C
harge” to connect some of those customers. The City will continue to be limited to providing electric service at secondary voltage for only certain categories of customers, even if that is the technically appropriate voltage level, due to limitations imposed by PG&E. After approval by the San Francisco P
ublic Utilities Commission, the Board of Supervisors approved the settlement on June 3, 2025, and the Mayor approved it on June 11, 2025. PG&E filed the settlement with FERC for its approval on August 11, 2025. FERC approved the settlement on November 6, 2025, and it has been in effect since.
P
reviously, while the settlement agreement was in the process of getting approval by FERC, PG&E obstructed the interconnection of small public safety related devices by bringing up issues unrelated to w
holesale electric service, as well as being unresponsive to SFPUC’s communications. Since then, a por
tion of these public safety devices have been connected. However, as elaborated in section 4 below, P
G&E has imposed unnecessary requirements for smaller devices attached to City-owned traffic controllers and streetlight poles and has made the implementation of some of the settlement terms tenuous.
3 Infrastructure affected Impact Status
1 Elimination of
Service to
Unmetered
Load
Streetlights, traffic signals, bus
shelters, ShotSpotter devices,
emergency sirens, street
furniture, news racks, and
similarly small electric loads
often located in the public right
of way.
All unmetered load served by
Hetchy will need to install primary
equipment to connect to the PG&E-
owned grid or accept PG&E retail
service to continue to receive
electric service and function.
PG&E and the City have reached a
settlement under the WDT3 case
for specific types of devices.
Implementation procedures
currently imposed by PG&E are
hindering the connection of these
devices.
2 Elimination of
Service on
PG&E’s
Downtown
Network
Downtown area (includes all of
Market Street from Embarcadero
through Civic Center.)
Connecting new loads or Upgrades to
existing loads connected to the
PG&E-
owned grid in San Francisco’s
downtown area will be prohibited.
PG&E and the City have reached a
settlement under the WDT3 case
for
specific categories of customers.
3 Elimination of
New Secondary
Connections
Most Hetchy municipal
customers, like schools, public
restrooms, libraries, parks,
health clinics, firehouses, City
department offices.
When existing facilities undergo
renovations (like those for de-
carbonization) they will need to
install primary equipment to connect
to the PG&E-owned grid or accept
PG&E retail service to continue to
receive electric service and function.
PG&E and the City have reached a
settlement under the WDT3 case
for specific categories of
customers.
4 Assignment of
Costs for
Upgrades to
PG&E’s
System
Any City project that PG&E
decides requires an upgrade to
PG&E’s distribution system.
Projects are at risk of incurring
excessive costs to upgrade PG&E’s
infrastructure and build out PG&E’s
grid. PG&E retail customers benefit
from this, while PG&E makes a rate
of return on this equipment. Since
2018 City projects have paid ~$16M
to PG&E for these Upgrades.
PG&E did not challenge the initial
decision that the cost of Upgrades
is unjust, unreasonable, and unduly
discriminatory. The City received a
favorable final decision from
FERC on this issue. This issue is
being addressed under the WDT4
proceeding.
5 Costs for
Direct
Assignment
Facilities
Every City project needs direct
assignment facilities to connect
to PG&E’s distribution system.
Projects are at risk of incurring
excessive costs for Direct
Assignment Facilities. PG&E
charges its retail customers less than
its wholesale customers for similar
facilities.
PG&E challenged the initial
decision that the cost of direct
assignment facilities is unjust,
unreasonable, and unduly
discriminatory. The City received a
favorable final decision from
FERC on this issue. This is being
addressed under the WDT4
proceeding.
2. W
DT4 Filing and Protest
PG&E filed WDT4 on October 25, 2024. PG&E sought a 15% rate increase as well as an increase in its r
eturn on equity from 10.24% to 12.3%. While PG&E did not change the language from WDT3 on s
econdary voltage service, which the City protested, the WDT3 settlement (mentioned above), ensures that the City can continue to obtain secondary voltage service for certain types of projects under the WDT 4 for ten years. The cost issues the City protested in WDT3 (issues 4 and 5 above) remain in PG&E’s WDT4.
The City filed a Motion to Intervene and Protest on November 15, 2024, which includes a request for a five-month extension on the effective date of WDT4. FERC granted this extension request on December 23, 2024, and pushed the effective date of WDT4 to May 25, 2025. Since February 5, 2025 parties including the City, PG&E, and other WDT customers were engaged in the FERC mediation process. As of February 6, 2026, the parties have reached a settlement in principle and are working on finalizing the agreement language. The settlement will resolve several rate issues and includes a path forward for costs of Upgrades and Direct Assignment Facilities (Issues 4 and 5 above). Finalizing the agreement will result in lower costs than proposed in PG&E’s WDT4 filing but does not resolve other implementation issues that would be eliminated through the acquisition of PG&E’s electrical assets in the city.
3. FERC Orders on Remand – Grandfathering and Voltage
Grandfathering – On October 20, 2022, FERC ruled in the City’s favor and confirmed that the City can continue to provide public power to broad categories of municipal customers that it has been serving since 1992, without new electrical facilities. The types of customers that were grandfathered include City departments and agencies as well as related entities that serve a civic purpose like schools, museums, public housing, and tenants on City property. Though this was a favorable decision, PG&E has not changed its previous practices. PG&E has appealed FERC’s order, and the City has intervened in that appeal. PG&E filed its brief in that appeal with the D.C. Circuit on August 29, 2023. FERC submitted its brief on November 27, 2023, the City filed its intervenor brief on December 4, 2023, and PG&E filed a reply brief on January 16, 2024. The City participated in oral arguments before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on May 1, 2024. On August 23, 2024, the D.C. Circuit ruled in favor of PG&E finding FERC’s class-based interpretation of the grandfathering provision to be improper. The D.C. Circuit heavily relied on a recent Supreme Court ruling that has overturned decades-long precedent that gave administrative agencies deference while interpreting federal laws. The Court vacated and remanded the issue back to FERC. FERC issued a decision on remand on March 26, 2026, establishing hearing and settlement procedures to clarify which specific customers or points of delivery qualify for grandfathering. The City and PG&E have been engaged in settlement proceedings since April 23, 2026. The effect of this FERC decision and the settlement proceedings are limited, because the WDT3 settlement allows the City to continue to serve loads that we have argued are grandfathered.
4. Unmetered Load
As noted above, PG&E’s WDT no longer offers secondary service to the City and other wholesale customers, including service to the City’s unmetered loads, which are mainly streetlights, traffic signal systems, and similar small, predictable municipal loads that are billed based on FERC-approved usage formulas rather than metered usage. To operate these loads, the City either must pay more for PG&E retail service or spend more than $1 billion for large primary equipment that is unnecessary for safety or reliability purposes and causes City-wide disruptions.
PG&E and the City had an agreement in place that allows the City to continue to provide unmetered service to these loads during the pendency of the WDT3 matter at FERC. This issue has been resolved under the WDT3 settlement agreement mentioned above. Under the settlement, the City will be able to 5 continue to provide unmetered service to City streetlights, traffic signal controllers, bus shelters, and other temporary loads connected to City street lighting circuits that do not exceed 150 watts each. All other small loads connected to the street lighting circuits (i.e. wireless facilities, license plate readers) will need to be metered.
Recently, PG&E notified the City of several requirements for connecting small, metered devices including Distributed Antenna Services (DAS) for wireless phone companies on existing City-owned streetlight and traffic signal circuits which includes a separate application for service and $1,500 fee for each these device installations. SFPUC believes these requirements are unreasonable as these devices will be connected behind an existing authorized point of service and take little power (akin to plugging in an additional lamp in a home). These devices will be connected to existing SFPUC-owned circuits and do not affect the WDT interconnections. SFPUC staff continue to have discussions with PG&E staff regarding these requirements.
5. Franchise Disputes
In compliance with the San Francisco Administrative Code (Chapter 11, Article V, Section 11.44 (b)), the SFPUC files a report with the Board of Supervisors on PG&E’s compliance with the provisions of Chapter 11 of the Administrative Code and the 1939 Franchise Agreements between PG&E and the City.
The City continues to have disputes with PG&E regarding its obligations under the Franchise Agreements. Further details on these disputes will be provided in the Franchise Compliance Report later this year.
Attachment A1: Projects with Active Applications
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
PG&E NN# Project Location District # Client
Organization
Project Description
(what SF applied for)
Initial
Application
Submittal
Date
App Deemed
Complete
Date
Initial Service
Need Date
Did PG&E
require
Primary?
Load Size/Can
Be Served at
Secondary
Did PG&E
require a
System Impact
Study? (Y/N)
Impacts Updates/Changes since Last Report (March 2026)
1 126363173
499 Sea Cliff Avenue -
Pump Station and
Force Main
1 SFPUC -Water
Increase in Contract
Demand for existing
secondary service
Delays caused by
dispute over primary
vs. secondary. Project
is moving forward with
secondary.
In construction 1/23/2023 6/13/2023 9/2/2024 Yes 30 kW/ Yes Y Delay Impact: PG&E initially rejected the project claiming there was a change in physical location, but later determined that there was not and then required multiple site visits to determine whether an SIS was required even though the requested load is very small (4 months).PG&E did not provide the final Service Agreement on time (2 months). Further delays caused by PG&E not completing the box replacement on time due to not having the approved material on site. (Delay impacts TBD).
Cost Impact: PG&E is charging the project ~$18k for Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers.
No impacts update.
2 112434942
3455 Van Ness
Avenue - AWSS Pump
Station No. 2
2 SFPUC - Water
Remove two existing
services and replace with
one secondary service
Delays caused by
dispute over primary
vs. secondary. Project
moving forward with
low-side metering. (See
Note 1)
Energized 12/9/2016 1/5/2017 8/1/2017 Yes 144 kW/Yes N
Delay Impact: PG&E not providing necessary cost detail to the Service Agreement (7 months).
Cost Impact: Additional project costs - $75k (interrupter, #7 box, installation). PG&E charging the project ~$193k for Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers.
This project has been energized and will be taken off of the next report.
3 126693698 850 Turk Street -
Affordable Housing 2 MOHCD New permanent service
Delays caused by PG&E
not providing the
Service Agreement
within a reasonable
timeframe.
In construction 4/13/2023 7/24/2023 4/1/2025 No 630/Yes N Delay Impact: PG&E not providing delaying the final service agreement (~2.5 months).
Cost Impact: PG&E charging the project ~$58k for Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers.
No impacts update.
4 125384204
1135 Powell Street-
Chinatown Branch
Library
3 SFPW Temporary De-
energization
Delays caused by PG&E
claiming subsurface
transformer shortages.
In construction 11/29/2022 1/25/2023 1/1/2026 No 106 kW/Yes N Delay Impact: TBD - PG&E claims there is an industry-wide subsurface transformer shortage.
Cost Impact: TBD
No impacts update.
5 Several
applications
submitted
19th Avenue - Traffic
Signals 4 & 7 SFMTA
New unmetered
secondary services
(several traffic signals)
Delays caused by PG&E
cancelling the initial
applications.
Project moving forward
with PG&E retail
service.
Cancelled Various 3/14/2017 9/1/2019 No N/A N
Delay Impact: PG&E delayed the project by cancelling the existing contracts even though SF had completed and paid for the applications and paid for extensions. Project is looking to move forward to just reuse the existing service in an effort to not delay the project any further.
Cost Impact: TBD
This project has been cancelled and will be taken off of the next report.
6 129677302
2601 28th Ave-
Cathodic Protection
Phase 3
4 SFPUC New permanent service
Increased costs due to
PG&E charging the
project costs to
upgrade it's system.
In Construction 7/29/2024 10/11/2024 3/2/2026 N 2kW/Yes N Delay Impact: TBD
Cost Impact: PG&E charging the project ~$56k for Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers.
No impacts update.
7 Several
applications
submitted
Haight Street - Traffic
Signals 5 SFMTA
New unmetered
secondary services
(several traffic signals)
Delays caused by PG&E
cancelling the initial
applications.
In construction 4/22/2020 7/16/2020 11/30/2020 Yes N/A N Delay Impact: Project delayed as PG&E canceled the original applications. Public safety is at risk as the traffic signal infrastructure is completed and are just awaiting energization.
The public has been inquiring about signal activation status.
The traffic signals are moving forward, but there are disagreements on whether or not unmetered holiday lighting can be added to these poles.
Cost Impact: TBD
No impacts update.
8 116790877 Market Street & 7th
Street - BMS Switch 6 SFMTA New secondary service
Delays caused by PG&E
not following WDT
timelines and not
providing cost
explanations.
Energized 3/6/2019 4/9/2019 1/4/2021 No 48 kW/Yes N
Delay Impact: PG&E was late in providing the service agreement and was unresponsive in providing further cost explanation. Project to be energized by 3/23/2027. Further delays caused by PG&E delaying construction by ~1 month, and also retracting their stance from more than 4 months ago on a design change at the energization stage.
Cost Impact: TBD
This project has been energized and will be taken off of the next report.
9 N/A
Transbay Transit
Center - Transbay
Joint Powers Authority
6 SFPUC - Power Two new primary
services (5 MW each)
Potential dispute over
reserved capacity and
project true-up costs.
Energized 9/12/2018 2/6/2019 10/1/2018 N/A 10 MW/No N
Delay Impact: None - project is energized.
Cost Impact: PG&E has requested an additional ~$5M from SF in an extremely late project true-up request. PG&E has yet to provide adequate justification for this amount.
No impacts update.
Project Status
Attachment A1: Projects with Active Applications
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
PG&E NN# Project Location District # Client
Organization
Project Description
(what SF applied for)
Initial
Application
Submittal
Date
App Deemed
Complete
Date
Initial Service
Need Date
Did PG&E
require
Primary?
Load Size/Can
Be Served at
Secondary
Did PG&E
require a
System Impact
Study? (Y/N)
Impacts Updates/Changes since Last Report (March 2026)Project Status 10 122206857/
128708098
*77 Harriet Street -
Gene Friend Rec
Center
(formerly 270 6th
Street)
6 SFRPD New secondary service
Increased costs due to
PG&E's primary
requirements. Project
moving forward with
secondary. Project
anticipates further
delays caused by PG&E
delaying the final
Service Agreement
delivery.
Energized 8/16/2021 7/3/2023 Yes 348 kW/Yes N
Delay Impact: Delays caused by PG&E initially requiring primary. Further delays caused by PG&E not providing the final Service Agreement (SA) on time. (~4 months). This delay will lead to further displacement of a violence prevention and youth development organization for an additional year.
Cost Impact: PG&E charging the project ~$340k for Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers.
This project has been energized and will be taken off of the next report.
11 125991771 2098 Alameda Street -
Stormwater Project 6 SFPUC - Water New primary service
Delays caused by PG&E
extending timeline for
Draft System Impact
Study
In Construction 12/15/2022 4/25/2023 2/1/2023 N/A 7200 kW/No Y Delay Impact: PG&E requested additional time on System Impact Study draft (1 month).
PG&E has also delayed Final Service Agreement submission by ~2months. PG&E has further delayed the submission of the Final Service Agreement by ~4 months. Further delays caused by PG&E delaying the submission of the Final Service Agreement by an additional ~2 months.
Cost Impact: PG&E charging the project ~$192k for Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers.
Updated project status and column O to include actual costs of Upgrades incurred by the project.
12 N/A
460 Jessie Street -
Cordia Steam Loop
(Transmission Level
Service)
6 SFPUC New primary service
Delays caused by PG&E
not providing System
Impact Study on time.
PG&E to provide
Facilities Study Report 5/11/2023 6/13/2023 10/15/2026 N/A 25 MW/No N Delay Impact: Delays caused by PG&E delaying System Impact Study by ~8 months.
Cost Impact: Project anticipates high Upgrade costs of over $100M.
Updated project status to include next steps.
13 127515803 160 Freelon Street-
Affordable Housing 6 MOHCD New secondary service
Delays caused by PG&E
not providing the final
Service Agreement on
time
In construction 8/23/2023 11/14/2023 10/31/2025 N/A 590 kW/ Yes N Delay Impact: Delays caused by PG&E delaying the submission of the final Service Agreement by ~1.5 months.
Cost Impact: . PG&E is charging the project $568k for Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers.
Project added.
14 127414476
3500 Great Highway -
Oceanside Recycled
Water & Water
Pollution Control Plant
7 SFPUC
1) Increase in Contract
Demand to existing
primary service.
2) Interconnection
Agreement Application
for Generating Facility
Delays caused by PG&E
providing the System
Impact Study late.
Delays caused by
PG&E's lack of
coordination, providing
prompt technical
review feedback, or
field shutdown and
inspection support.
Primary service
application cancelled
Generating facility
shutdown completed.
10/4/2022
4/2/2014
10/21/2022
8/15/2018
11/29/2022
9/1/2020
N/A
N/A
5,200 kW/No
(Existing is
2,635 kW)
N/A
N
N
Delay Impact: Initial delays caused by PG&E not providing the System Impact Study (SIS) report on time. PG&E requested 4 month extension from original due date of 4/18/2023 to 8/11/2023, and then finally submitted the SIS report on 12/8/2023. This is a 160 business days delay. Further delays caused by PG&E delaying the delivery of the revised SIS from 11/25/2024 to 2/3/2025 this is an additional 45 business days delay.
The generating facility delays have been caused by numerous requests for PG&E to provide technical review feedback for compliance with the interconnection agreement.
SFPUC awaited the final review, approvals and field shutdown coordination from PG&E for the existing power service interconnection. Further delays caused by PG&E stating that the generating facility application must be applied for under PG&E Retail (Rule 21). (Delay timeline TBD).
Cost Impact: These delays above have time/cost impacts and are estimated to be $14M or more. These costs include ~$9.4M in contractor claims regarding the delays; and ~$4.6M in extended overhead project costs.
No impacts update.
15 129333964
*5 Lenox Way - West
Portal Elementary
School
7 SFUSD Upgrade existing
secondary service
Delays caused by PG&E
requesting
modifications to site
plan
In construction 10/31/2023 8/5/2024 6/25/2024 N/A 900 kW/Yes N Delay Impact: Delays caused by PG&E delaying draft Service Agreement (~4 months).
Cost Impact: PG&E's redesign cost the project team an additional ~$4,500. Project anticipates ~$750k in additional costs to maintain current and to install additional diesel generators due to long PG&E WDT timelines. PG&E is charging the project ~$16k for Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers.
No impacts update.
16 Several
applications
submitted
16th Street
Improvement Project -
Traffic Signals
8 & 9 SFMTA
New unmetered
secondary services
(several traffic signals)
Delays caused by PG&E
cancelling the initial
applications.
Cancelled Various Jun-Jul 2017 1/1/2022 N/A N/A N
Delay Impact: PG&E delayed the project by canceling the existing contracts even though we had completed and paid for the applications and paid for extensions. Project is looking to move forward to just reuse the existing service in an effort to not delay the project any further.
Cost Impact: TBD
This project has been cancelled and will be taken off of the next report.
Attachment A1: Projects with Active Applications
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
PG&E NN# Project Location District # Client
Organization
Project Description
(what SF applied for)
Initial
Application
Submittal
Date
App Deemed
Complete
Date
Initial Service
Need Date
Did PG&E
require
Primary?
Load Size/Can
Be Served at
Secondary
Did PG&E
require a
System Impact
Study? (Y/N)
Impacts Updates/Changes since Last Report (March 2026)Project Status 17 123635730
2500 Mariposa Street -
Potrero Yard
Modernization (Mixed
Use)
9 SFMTA New primary service
Potential delays caused
by PG&E not providing
the System Impact
Study draft on time.
PG&E to provide final
Service Agreement by
2/24/2026.
12/10/2021 5/19/2022 6/1/2023 N/A 11,000 kW/No Y
Delay Impact: Delays caused by PG&E not providing the System Impact Study (SIS) report on time and requesting that the project reduce the total load size for both the industrial use and mixed-use applications together to not exceed 12,000 kW, due to PG&E claiming limited available grid capacity. Given this, the project canceled the industrial use application below and updated the load size of the mixed-use application from 7,800 kW to 11,000 kW. This load size increase triggered a new SIS which has caused further delays to a 3-level bus yard (involving battery electric bus infrastructure) and an affordable housing development project (up to 575 units.)
Due to these delays, the new permanent power need date has been updated to July 2027. Further delays caused by PG&E delaying the final SA by ~ 5 months.
Cost Impact: According to the draft Service Agreement, PG&E is estimating ~$11.7M in construction costs which includes 11,110 feet of trenching to the Potrero Substation. This will likely make the project infeasible. This will likely make the project infeasible.
No impacts update.
18 123044737/
127547587
*300 Bartlett Street
(Mission Branch
Library)
9 SFPW
Increase in Contract
Demand to existing
secondary service.
Delays caused by PG&E
initially requiring
primary. Project
moving forward with
secondary. Further
delays caused by PG&E
requiring a re-design,
and claiming
subsurface transformer
shortages.
In construction 2/26/2020 3/1/2022 8/1/2022 Yes 190 kW/Yes N Delay Impact: Project delayed - project was in dispute from Feb. 2020 - Jun. 2021 (15-16 months). Further delays were caused by PG&E requiring a redesign even though the design was agreed upon months ago. Additional delays were caused by PG&E moving the deadline for the primary design from 6/5/2023 to 9/7/2023.
Cost Impact: TBD
No impacts update.
19 129144131
1515 South Van Ness
Avenue (Casa
Adelante) -
Mixed Use, Affordable
Housing (168 units)
9 MOHCD New secondary service
for perm.
Delays caused by PG&E
not providing the final
Service Agreement on
time
In construction 4/5/2024 6/28/2024 4/1/2025 No 859 kW/ Yes N Delay Impact: Project delayed due to PG&E delaying the final Service Agreement by 1 month. Further delays caused by PG&E not providing the final SA and at-risk inspection on time (~1 month)
Cost Impact: Temp. construction power service by PG&E at retail - $224k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $69k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. PG&E is estimated to charge the project ~$367k for Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers.
No impacts update.
20 128015642
(Phase 2:
1.6MW)
131039707
(Phase 2:
7.71MW)
529 Harmonia Street -
Sunnydale HOPE (Two
Phases)
10 SFPUC - Power New primary service -
phased approach
Delays caused by
dispute over capacity.
Project is moving in
phases now and PG&E
has agreed to providing
the full capacity
request by SF.
Phase 2 (multiphase):
interim capacity increase
to 1.6MW is complete
PG&E to provide Final
Service Agreement and
Invoice for the full
7.7MW capacity [TBD]
8/3/2023 1/9/2024 7/3/2034 N/A 7,710 kW/ No Y
Delay Impact: Delays caused by PG&E unilaterally significantly reducing the load requested and not responding to SF's questions regarding load calculations in the System Impact Study draft agreement. Due to the urgency of the project, SF has agreed to move forward with PG&E's lower load calculations and will apply to PG&E for additional capacity when the load ramps up. Project has interim capacity needs between phase 1 and phase 2 of this project and anticipates PG&E not being able to meet the necessary energization timelines requested.
Phase 1 included switchgear (permanent delivery point for the project) and initial service point energization. SF is working with PG&E to provide additional capacity for phase 2 (multiphase) expansion. Further delays caused by PG&E delaying the delivery of the Facilities Study (~6 months).
SF has had to agree to splitting the Phase 2 application to avoid delays to the interim capacity increase of 1.6 MW. PG&E to provide final Service agreement for the remaining balance to 7.7MW.
Cost Impact: PG&E is requiring SF to construct offsite infrastructure for PG&E to serve the load that is typically done by PG&E - cost is TBD.
PG&E is charging the project ~$4.4M for Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers. These costs are likely to rise once PG&E provides the project their final service agreement for the full second phase (7.71MW).
Updated Column H to include that the interim capacity increase for phase 2 is complete. Updated column B to include updated NN number.
Attachment A1: Projects with Active Applications
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
PG&E NN# Project Location District # Client
Organization
Project Description
(what SF applied for)
Initial
Application
Submittal
Date
App Deemed
Complete
Date
Initial Service
Need Date
Did PG&E
require
Primary?
Load Size/Can
Be Served at
Secondary
Did PG&E
require a
System Impact
Study? (Y/N)
Impacts Updates/Changes since Last Report (March 2026)Project Status 21 115583820
(Phase 1)
128078606
(Phase 2)
1108 Connecticut
Street - HOPE Potrero
(Two Phases)
10 SFPUC - Power New primary service -
phased approach
Delays caused by
dispute over capacity.
Project is moving in
phases now and PG&E
has agreed to providing
the full capacity
request by SF. Further
delays caused by PG&E
delaying the final
Service Agreement for
Phase 1.
Phase 1: Energized on
4/8/2025
Phase 2: PG&E to
provide Final Service
Agreement by 8/24/2026
12/13/2018
7/28/2023
4/4/2019
1/23/2024
6/1/2019
7/1/2030
N/A
947 kW/No
(original
request was for
4,000 kW)
18,750 kW/ No
Y
Delay Impact: Delays caused by PG&E unilaterally significantly reducing the load requested and not responding to SF's questions regarding load calculations in the System Impact Study draft agreement. Due to the urgency of the project, SF has agreed to move forward with PG&E's lower load calcs and will apply to PG&E for additional capacity when the load ramps up. PG&E's long lead time for engineering/ design may cause delay in Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO) of new buildings. Phase 1 of this project has been delayed due to PG&E delaying the draft Service Agreement by ~2 months.
Cost Impact: PG&E is requiring SF to construct offsite infrastructure for PG&E to serve the load that is typically done by PG&E - cost is TBD.
PG&E is charging the project ~$13M for potential Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers. These costs are likely to rise once PG&E provides the project their final service agreement for the second phase.
Updated Column H to include final Service Agreement delivery date.
22 116967240 702 Phelps Street -
SFMTA Substation 10 SFMTA Request to increase loads
Delays caused by PG&E
being late in providing
the System Impact
Study report.
In construction 2/26/2019 6/28/2019 5/1/2019 N/A 4000 kW/No Y Delay Impact: Delays caused by PG&E not providing the System Impact Study report on time (~4 months). More delays caused by PG&E not providing the Service Agreement on time.
Further delays caused by PG&E not providing enough design detail with the Service Agreement, changing the design, and pushing back the completion of final design by 6 months.
Cost Impact: TBD
No impacts update.
23 114529750/
121353271
1920 Evans - Arborist
Trailer/BUF Yard 10 SFPW New secondary service Delays caused by issues with overhead poles. In construction 4/16/2018 8/10/2018 10/1/2018 No 37 kW/Yes N Delay Impact: Project has been delayed due to issues with an overhead pole. PG&E's proposed design was not feasible as it required overhead poles to be installed above underground sewer utilities. Project was further delayed when PG&E's re-design took several months. PG&E continued to delay Final Service Agreement submission from 4/6/2023 to 9/8/2023. Labor availability issues have further delayed this project.
Cost Impact: PG&E charging the project ~$54k for Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers.
No impacts update.
24 128611830
1301 Cesar Chavez -
Islais Creek - BEB
Charging
Infrastructure
10 SFMTA Upgrade of existing
secondary service
Additional costs to be
incurred due to PG&E's
high Upgrade costs.
In construction 1/12/2024 4/22/2024 5/1/2026 N/A 838 kW/ Yes N Delay Impact: Delays caused by PG&E not providing the final Service Agreement (SA) on time. (~7 months). Additional delays caused by PG&E further delaying providing the final SA by an additional ~1.5months.
Cost Impact:
PG&E is charging the project ~$300k for Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers.
No impacts update.
25 132010187
1001 Potrero -
General Hospital
(2403 23rd St)
10 SFDPH New primary service
Delays caused by PG&E
refusing to move
forward with WDT
application for
emergency power.
PG&E to provide System
Impact Study. 1/15/2025 1/1/2026 N/A 3,591 kW/ No N
Delay Impact: Delays caused by PG&E refusing to allow project to move forward with a WDT application for back-up power in the case of an emergency, and encouraging the project to be released to PG&E Retail in order to be served. PG&E is citing capacity and inadequate compensation concerns under the WDT for their refusal. Further delays caused by PG&E being unresponsive on meeting request dates (~1 month).
Cost Impact: TBD.
No impacts update.
26 121767960 Cesar Chavez &
Indiana - Pump 10 SFPUC New secondary service Delays caused by PG&E portal issues In construction 1/27/2021 7/19/2021 11/7/2022 Yes 190 kW/Yes N Delay Impact: Project submitted under WDT2 - PG&E initially required primary due to project team requesting 120V single phase service. Moving forward with secondary, however, project team to install a transformer for PG&E to own. Additional delays caused by PG&E's portal not allowing project team to complete payment (TBD).
Cost Impact: TBD
Project added.
Attachment A1: Projects with Active Applications
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
PG&E NN# Project Location District # Client
Organization
Project Description
(what SF applied for)
Initial
Application
Submittal
Date
App Deemed
Complete
Date
Initial Service
Need Date
Did PG&E
require
Primary?
Load Size/Can
Be Served at
Secondary
Did PG&E
require a
System Impact
Study? (Y/N)
Impacts Updates/Changes since Last Report (March 2026)Project Status 27 123379714
455 Athens Street -
Cleveland Elementary
School
11 SFUSD
Upgrade and relocation
of existing secondary
service
Delays caused by
dispute over primary
vs. secondary. Project
is moving forward with
primary.
In construction 10/26/2020 1/28/2022 6/1/2021 Yes 305 kW/Yes N Delay Impact: Delays caused by PG&E providing the Service Agreement late. Project delays can lead to potential delay in school building opening which may result in only partial occupancy of building for 2023-24 school year and beyond. PG&E originally promised to provide the final Service Agreement no later than May 2023. However, PG&E further delayed the final Service Agreement to August 2023. Further delays caused by PG&E rescinding approval for previously approved underground infrastructure.
Cost Impact: Due to the above delay the project will incur a monthly general contractor contract extension fee of approximately $20k per month with a total of approximately $240k for a one-year delay in construction. Additional project costs for primary service with $345k for primary switchgear and related labor costs.
No impacts update.
28 123409909
2340 San Jose Avenue -
Affordable Housing
(138 units)
12 MOHCD New secondary service
Delays caused by
dispute over primary
vs. secondary. Project
moving forward with
secondary.
Phase 1 energized
Phase 2 energized
11/21/2019 4/25/2022 5/1/2020 Yes 800 kW/Yes N
Delay Impact: Project was in dispute from Jan. 2020 to Sept. 2021 (20-21 months).
Further delays incurred so project is now being split into two phases. PG&E delayed providing the final Service Agreement (1 month). Both phases have been energized, however PG&E to send project reconciliation. (Delay TBD).
Cost Impact: Temp. construction power service by PG&E at retail with $191k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $34k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. PG&E is charging the project $715k for Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers. Project team anticipates large true-up due to PG&E's outstanding work post energization. (Cost impact TBD).
Both phases of this project have been energized. However, updated impacts Column O to include further delays.
29 Several
applications
submitted
Contract 65 - Traffic
Signals (Various
locations)
Various SFMTA
New unmetered
secondary services
(several traffic signals)
Delays caused by PG&E
cancelling applications
and being un-
responsive. Project
moving forward with
PG&E retail service.
In construction 1/16/2020 Various Spring 2023 No N/A N
Delay Impact: PG&E has canceled some applications which will cause redesign and change orders. These delays will impact the construction schedule. Furthermore, such cancellations have delayed resolving ongoing pedestrian safety issues. Additional delays have been caused due to PG&E's failure to maintain their electrical equipment that needs to be replaced (~1 month). More delays caused by PG&E refusing to accommodate project team's request to complete onsite work at night (~2 months). Some applications under this project have been canceled due to PG&E claiming that they have not been able to complete their end of construction including replacing cables.
Cost Impact: TBD
No impacts update.
30 122406887
1900 El Camino Real -
Water Testing
Equipment
N/A SFPUC New secondary service
Delays caused by PG&E
not providing the
Service Agreement
within a reasonable
timeframe.
In construction 10/30/2020 3/1/2021 5/31/2019 No 2 kW/Yes N Delay Impact: PG&E has been performing engineering/design since March 2022. PG&E's timeline for completion was pushed back from July 2022 to October 2022 (3 months).
Cost Impact: TBD
No impacts update.
31 N/A Multiple Service
Transfers N/A Various City Depts. Service Transfers
Delays caused by PG&E
requiring unnecessary
equipment or
information for service
transfer requests.
Project is at a standstill. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N
Delay Impact: Project not being able to move forward.
Cost Impact: Additional costs and staff resources can be incurred if PG&E continues to create barriers for SF service transfer requests.
SF continues to experience loss of revenue and additional power costs as PG&E is refusing to transfer over City department loads.
No impacts update.
32 121592273
951 Antoinette Lane -
Well Pump & Control
Panel
N/A -
South SF SFPUC
Remove two existing
services and replace with
one secondary service
Delays caused by
dispute over primary
vs. secondary. Project
moving forward with
secondary.
PG&E to provide
redesign final SA by
9/10/2026
11/19/2020 N/A 12/5/2021 Yes 49 kW/Yes N
Delay Impact: Project was in dispute from Feb. - April 2021 (1-2 months).
Further delays caused by PG&E providing the final design late (4 months).
Cost Impact: PG&E charging the project $173k for Upgrades to their own distribution system that will benefit PG&E's retail customers.
Updated Column H to include final Service Agreement delivery date.
Attachment A1: Projects with Active Applications
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
PG&E NN# Project Location D istrict # Client
Organization
Project Description
(what SF applied for)
Initial
Application
S
ubmittal
Date
App Deemed
Complete
D
ate
Initial Service
Need Date
Did PG&E
require
P
rimary?
Load Size/Can
Be Served at
S
econdary
Did PG&E
require a
S
ystem Impact
Study? (Y/N)
Impacts Updates/Changes since Last Report (March 2026)Project Status 33 131368806
1000 El Camino Real -
Plumbing Shop
B
uilding
N/A -
South SF SFPUC
P
ermanent disconnect of
existing service and close
a
ccount.
Delays caused by PG&E
delaying submission of
t
he Work Performance
Agreement.
Energized 5/23/2025 6/16/2025 6/16/2025 N/A N/A N/A
Delay Impact: Delays caused by PG&E delaying the Work Performance Agreement by ~2 m
onths. Further delays caused by PG&E requesting two separate applications for this request. (TBD)
Cost Impact: TBD
This project has been energized and will be taken off of the next report.
Notes:
1. Low-side metering is not the same as secondary service. Low-side metering requires extra equipment costs (i.e. an interrupter, approx. $75k). The SFPUC believes that many of these loads should be served with secondary service, but has compromised with PG&E to move projects forward.
2. Cost impacts related to lost revenue are estimates calculated off of projected load values.
3. Not all cost impacts are reflected here as increased facility and construction costs are still to be determined.
4. Delay impacts are only calculated off of the time in which PG&E and SF were in dispute. (Other delays are not included)
5. Primary switchgear is estimated to cost an additional $500k.
Key
Project is currently being disputed or has been delayed due to a dispute/issue and is past the Initial Service Need Date (Column K).
Energized, but still facing issues.
Project is moving forward, but not yet energized. Some are still facing major delays. Please review the impact column for further descriptions.
Project has been energized - no outstanding issues.
* These projects are moving forward under the Voltage Settlement.
Attachment A2: Projects Released to Retail PG&E Service under WDT3
A B C D E F G
Project Location District # Client Organization Project Description (what SF applied for) Impacts Updates/Changes since Last Report (March 2026) 1 499 Seacliff Avenue - Pump Station
and Force Main 1 SFPUC New temporary secondary
service
$19k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for duration of temporary service. $5k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 2 100 Seacliff Avenue - Pump Station 1 SFPUC New temporary secondary service
$147k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for duration of temporary service. $27k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 3 970 47th Avenue - Golden Gate Park
Clubhouse (Temporary trailer) 1 SFRPD New temporary secondary service
Project has been delayed several months. SF originally applied for service before WDT3 and after months of back and forth, PG&E stated they could not provide the service. $21k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for duration of temporary service. $33k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
4 4200 Geary Boulevard - Affordable
Housing (Construction power) 1 MOHCD New temporary secondary service
$45k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for duration of temporary service. $8k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 5 850 Turk Street - Affordable Housing
(Construction power)
2 MOHCD New temporary secondary
service
$944k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $167k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
6 750 Golden Gate Ave - Affordable
Housing (Construction power) 2 MOHCD New temporary secondary service
$1.4M in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $513k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 7 750 Golden Gate Ave - Affordable
Housing
2 MOHCD New permanent secondary
service
$1.1M/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $403k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
8 346 Post Street - SFPD Command
Van
3 SFPD New temporary secondary
service
$2k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $4k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
9 822 Geary Street - Overdose
Prevention and Crisis Stabilization 3 DPH New permanent secondary service
$78k/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $81k/yr. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update.
10 Seawall Lots 323 & 324 - Hotel &
Theater (Construction power)
3 Teatro Zinzanni New temporary secondary
service
$132k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for duration of temporary service. $4k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
11 2001 Embarcadero Street -Port
SkyStar Observation Wheel
(Temporary power)
3 SFRPD/PORT New temporary secondary
service
$737k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for duration of temporary service. $228k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 12 2550 Irving Street - Affordable
Housing (Construction power)
4 MOHCD New temporary secondary
service
$256k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for duration of temporary service. $30k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
13 Sunset Boulevard & Lawton Street -
Recycled Water Irrigation Pump 4 SFPW New permanent secondary service
$15k/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $25k/yr. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update.
14 Sunset Boulevard & Taraval Street -
Recycled Water Irrigation Pump 4 SFPW New permanent secondary service
$15k/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $25k/yr. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update.
15 Sunset Boulevard & Yorba Street -
Recycled Water Irrigation Pump
4 SFPW New permanent secondary
service
$15k/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $25k/yr. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
16 730 Stanyan Street - Affordable
Housing (Construction power)
5 MOHCD New temporary secondary
service
$148k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for duration of temporary service. $28k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
17 240 Van Ness Avenue - Affordable
Housing (Construction power) 5 MOHCD New temporary secondary service
$87k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $15k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 18 650 Divisadero Street - Affordable
Housing (Construction power) 5 MOHCD New temporary secondary service
$3.2M in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $1.2M. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 19 880 McAllister Street - Affordable
Housing (Construction power) 5 MOHCD New temporary secondary service
$284k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $131k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 20 880 McAllister Street - Affordable
Housing
5 MOHCD New permanent secondary
service
$1.86M/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $599k/yr. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
21 420 Terry A. Francois Boulevard -
Pump Controller
6 SFPUC New permanent secondary
service
$9k/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $800/yr. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
22 16th Street & Harrison - Stormwater
Project
6 SFPUC New permanent secondary
service
$1k/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $12/yr. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
Attachment A2: Projects Released to Retail PG&E Service under WDT3 23 202 Channel Street - Mission Bay
Stormwater Pump Station 6 SFPUC New permanent secondary service
$113k/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $6k/yr. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update.
24 600 7th Street - Affordable Housing
(Construction power) 6 MOHCD New temporary secondary
service
$189k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $20k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 25 233 Beale Street - New Park 6 SFRPD New permanent secondary service
$12k/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $19k/yr. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update.
26 160 Freelon Street - Affordable
Housing (Construction power) 6 MOHCD New temporary secondary service
$716k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $127k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 27 270 6th Street - Gene Friend (SOMA)
Recreation Center (Temporary
power)
6 SFRPD New temporary secondary
service
$187k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $176k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 28 967 Mission Street - Affordable
Housing (Construction power)
6 MOHCD New temporary secondary
service
$872k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $317k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
29 1144 & 1200-1298 Third Street -
Affordable Housing (Construction
power)
6 MOHCD New temporary secondary
service
$1.49M in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $108k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 30 1144 & 1200-1298 Third Street -
Affordable Housing
6 MOHCD New temporary secondary
service
$6.85M/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $2.2M/yr. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
31 499 John Muir Drive - Wastewater
Pump
7 SFPUC Upgrade to existing
permanent Service
$5.4k/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $6.5k/yr for the duration of temporary service. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
32 Balboa Reservoir Park (Site A) -
Affordable Housing
7 MOHCD New permanent secondary
service
$794k/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $375k/yr. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
33 Balboa Reservoir Park (Site E) -
Affordable Housing
7 MOHCD New permanent secondary
service
$573k/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $273k/yr. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
34 250 Laguna Honda Boulevard
(Construction power)
7 MOHCD New temporary secondary
service
$1.6M in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $590k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
35 1939 Market Street - Affordable
Housing Development (Construction
power)
8 MOHCD New temporary secondary
service
$301k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $48k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 36 2530 18th Street - Homeless
Prenatal Program Family Housing
(Construction power)
9 Homeless Prenatal
Program/MOHCD
New temporary secondary
service
$246k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $93k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 37 1979 Mission Street - Tiny Homes
Project
9 HSH New temporary secondary
service
$191k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $246k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
38 300 Bartlett Street - Mission Branch
Library renovation (Temporary
power)
9 SFPL New temporary secondary
service
$72k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $93k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 39 1515 South Van Ness Ave -
Affordable Housing (Construction
power)
9 MOHCD New temporary secondary
service
$224k in in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $69k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 40 2970 16th Street - Affordable
Housing (Construction power)
9 MOHCD New temporary secondary
service
$3.4M in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $1.2M in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
41 1236 Carroll Avenue - Temporary
Lights and Cameras (for future SFFD
training facility)
10 SFFD New temporary secondary
service $11k/yr. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 42 India Basin - 900 Innes (Construction
power) 10 SFRPD New temporary secondary
service
Temp. construction power using generators - costs TBD.
Temp. power service from different source - estimated $18k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. No impacts update. 43 India Basin - Wi-fi Pop-Up 10 SFRPD New temporary secondary service
Temp. power service used generators - costs TBD. Project energized under PG&E retail service - $15k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $24k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
44 1035 Gilman Avenue - Bret Harte
Elementary (Temporary trailer) 10 SFUSD New temporary secondary service
SF had initially applied to PG&E for temp. power service for the duration of temporary service.
PG&E was unable to meet the project's schedule, so the project team redesigned and revised the plans so that the project could connect to the portables to the existing service.
No impacts update.
45 500 Hunters Point - Temporary RV
Parking for the Unhoused
10 SFHSH New temporary secondary
service
$2.8M in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $1M in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
Attachment A2: Projects Released to Retail PG&E Service under WDT3 46 2000 Marin Street - City Distribution
Division Headquarters Application #1
(Construction Power)
10 SFPUC New temporary secondary
service
$2.4M in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $727k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 47 2000 Marin Street - City Distribution
Division Headquarters Application #2
(Construction Power)
10 SFPUC New temporary secondary
service
$534k in lost gross revenue to SFPUC for the duration of temporary service. $161k in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates. No impacts update. 48 200 San Andreas Valley Road - Fiber
Optic Amplifier
N/A SFPUC New permanent secondary
service
$700/yr. in lost gross revenue to SFPUC. $25/yr. in additional power costs to the project due to PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
49 Streetlights N/A SFPUC New unmetered service Cost impact TBD. New streetlights have had to apply to PG&E for retail service and will have to pay PG&E's higher rates.
No impacts update.
50 Traffic Controllers N/A SFMTA New unmetered service Cost impact TBD. New traffic controllers have had to apply to PG&E for retail service and will incur additional costs due to PG&E now requiring traffic controllers to have meters.
No impacts update.
Affordable
Housing
Infrastructure Health
and Safety
Institution Recreation
SFPUC Metered
Service Point
Attachment B – Map Of
Interconnection Issues
Renovations or upgrades to any of
these service points could trigger
service disputes and delays.
As of May 2026
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
! !!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!
!
!
!! !!! !
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!!!! !
!!
! !!!! !
!
! !!!! !!!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!!
!
!
Cathodic Protection
Phase 3
Traffic Signals
Affordable Housing
Affordable Housing
Affordable Housing
Affordable Housing
Affordable Housing
Affordable Housing
Arborist Trailer
SFMTA Substation
Transbay Transit Center
Construction Trailers
Biosolids Temp. Power
BEB Charging Infrastructure
Irrigation Pumps
Irrigation Pumps
Redevelopment
Westside Pump Station
Traffic Signals
Overdose Prevention
Pump Controller
Stormwater
Project
SFPD Command Van
Irrigation Pumps
Wastewater Pump
Stormwater Pump
Stormwater Project
Stormwater Project
Oceanside Recycled Water
Observation Wheel
Chinatown Branch Library
RV Parking for the Unhoused
Lights & Camera
Wi-Fi Pop Up
City Distribution
Division Headquaters
Gene Friend Rec Center
Park Clubhouse Traffic Signals
Mission Branch Library
General Hospital
Cleveland ElementaryTraffic Signals
Affordable Housing
Affordable Housing
Affordable Housing
MTA Potrero Yard
Affordable Housing
Cordia Steam Loop
West Portal Elementary
Affordable Housing
Bret Harte
Elementary
Traffic Control
Affordable Housing
Pump Station
Pump Station
Pump
Attachment C: Cost Impacts
A B C D E F G H I J
Other Impacts to
SF
Project Location Redesign
Costs
Primary or Low-
side Metering
Equipment Costs
Additional
Construction
Costs
Additional Costs
to Project for
PG&E retail
service*
Additional
Const./Project
Mgmt. Costs
Due to Delay
Additional
Staff Time
Costs
Upgrades to
PG&E's
Distribution
System
Total
Additional
Project Costs
(B+C+D+E+F+G)
Lost gross
revenue to SFPUC
1 499 Seacliff Avenue - Pump Station and Force Main $ 18,000 $ 18,000 2 3455 Van Ness Avenue - AWSS Pump Station No. 2 $ 75,000 $ 193,000 $ 268,000 3 850 Turk Street - Affordable Housing $ 58,000 $ 58,000 4 1135 Powell Street- Chinatown Branch Library $ - 5 19th Avenue - Traffic Signals $ - 7 2601 28th Ave- Cathodic Protection Phase 3 $ 56,000 $ 56,000 8 Haight Street - Traffic Signals $ - 9 Market Street & 7th Street - BMS Switch $ - 10 Transbay Transit Center - Transbay Joint Powers Authority** 5,000,000$ $ 5,000,000 11 *** 77 Harriet Street (formerly 270 6th Street) - Gene Friend Rec Center $ 340,000 $ 340,000 12 2098 Alameda Street - Stormwater Project $ 192,000 $ 192,000 13 460 Jessie Street - Cordia Steam Loop $ - 14 160 Freelon Street- Affordable Housing $ 568,000 15 3500 Great Highway - Oceanside Recycled Water $ - 16 ***5 Lenox Way - West Portal Elementary School $ 16,000 $ 16,000 17 16th Street Improvement - Traffic Signals $ - 18 2500 Mariposa Street - Potrero Yard Modernization (Mixed-Use) $ - 19 ***300 Bartlett Street - Mission Branch Library $ 250,000 $ 168,000 $ 418,000 20 1515 South Van Ness Avenue (Casa Adelante) -
Mixed Use, Affordable Housing (168 units) $ $ - 21 529 Harmonia Street - Sunnydale HOPE $ 5,300,000 $ 5,300,000 22 1108 Connecticut Street - HOPE Potrero $ 5,500,000 $ 5,500,000 23 702 Phelps Street - SFMTA Substation $ - 24 1920 Evans - Arborist Trailer/BUF Yard $ 54,000 $ 54,000 25 1301 Cesar Chavez -Islais Creek - BEB Charging Infrastructure $ 300,000 $ 300,000 26 1001 Potrero - General Hospital (2403 23rd St) $ - 27 455 Athens Street - Cleveland Elementary School $ 345,000 240,000$ $ 585,000 28 2340 San Jose Avenue - Affordable Housing (138 units) $ 35,000 $ 715,000 $ 750,000 $ 191,000 29 Contract 65 - Traffic Signals (Various locations) $ - 30 1900 El Camino Real - Water Testing Equipment $ - 31 Multiple Service Transfers $ - 32 951 Antoinette Lane - Well Pump & Control Panel $ 173,000 $ 173,000 33 1000 El Camino Real - Plumbing Shop Building $ - 1 499 Seacliff Avenue - Pump Station and Force Main (Construction power) $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 19,000 2 100 Sea Cliff Avenue - Pump Station $ 27,000 $ 27,000 $ 147,000 3 970 47th Avenue - Golden Gate Park Clubhouse (Temporary trailer) $ 33,000 $ 33,000 $ 21,000 4 4200 Geary Boulevard - Affordable Housing (Construction power) $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 45,000 Attachment A1 Projects
Additional Costs to Project
Attachment C: Cost Impacts
Other Impacts to
SF
Project Location Redesign
Costs
Primary or Low-
side Metering
Equipment Costs
Additional
Construction
Costs
Additional Costs
to Project for
PG&E retail
service*
Additional
Const./Project
Mgmt. Costs
Due to Delay
Additional
Staff Time
Costs
Upgrades to
PG&E's
Distribution
System
Total
Additional
Project Costs
(B+C+D+E+F+G)
Lost gross
revenue to SFPUC
Additional Costs to Project
5 850 Turk Street - Affordable Housing (Construction power) $ 166,700 $ 166,700 $ 944,000 6 750 Golden Gate Ave - Affordable Housing (Construction power) $ 512,806 $ 512,806 $ 1,409,439 7 750 Golden Gate Ave - Affordable Housing $ 403,606 $ 403,606 $ 1,109,305 8 346 Post Street - SFPD Command Van $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 2,000 9 822 Geary Street - Overdose Prevention and Crisis Stabilization $ 81,000 $ 81,000 $ 78,000 10 Seawall Lots 323 & 324 - Hotel & Theater (Construction power) $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 132,000 11 2001 Embarcadero Street -Port SkyStar Observation Wheel (Temporary power) $ 228,000 $ 228,000 $ 737,000 12 2550 Irving Street - Affordable Housing (Construction power) $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 256,000 13 Sunset Boulevard & Lawton Street - Recycled Water Irrigation Pump 25,000$ $ 25,000 $ 15,000 14 Sunset Boulevard & Taraval Street - Recycled Water Irrigation Pump 25,000$ $ 25,000 $ 15,000 15 Sunset Boulevard & Yorba Street - Recycled Water Irrigation Pump 25,000$ $ 25,000 $ 15,000 16 730 Stanyan Street - Affordable Housing (Construction power) $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 148,000 17 240 Van Ness Avenue - Affordable Housing (Construction power) $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 87,000 18 650 Divisadero Street - Affordable Housing (Construction power) $ 1,161,000 $ 1,161,000 $ 3,216,000 19 880 McAllister Street - Affordable Housing (Construction power) $ 131,000 $ 131,000 $ 284,000 20 880 McAllister Street - Affordable Housing $ 599,000 $ 599,000 21 420 Terry A. Francois Boulevard - Pump Controller $ 800 $ 800 $ 9,000 22 16th Street & Harrison - Stormwater Project $ 12 $ 12 $ 1,000 23 202 Channel Street - Mission Bay Stormwater Pump Station $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 113,000 24 600 7th Street - Affordable Housing (Construction power) $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 189,000 25 233 Beale Street - New Park $ 19,000 $ 19,000 $ 12,000 26 160 Freelon Street - Affordable Housing (Construction power) $ 127,000 $ 127,000 $ 716,000 27 270 6th Street - Gene Friend (SOMA) Recreation Center (Temporary power) $ 176,000 $ 176,000 $ 187,000 28 1144 & 1200-1298 Third Street - Affordable Housing (Construction power) $ 108,000 $ 108,000 29 1144 & 1200-1298 Third Street - Affordable Housing $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 30 967 Mission Street - Affordable Housing (Construction power) $ 317,151 $ 317,151 $ 871,684.13 31 499 John Muir Drive - Wastewater Pump 6,500$ $ 6,500 $ 5,400 32 Balboa Reservoir Park (Site A) - Affordable Housing 375,000$ $ 375,000 $ 794,000 33 Balboa Reservoir Park (Site E) - Affordable Housing 273,000$ $ 273,000 $ 573,000 34 250 Laguna Honda Boulevard - Affordable Housing (Construction power) 590,000$ $ 590,000 $ 1,635,000 35 1939 Market Street - Affordable Housing Development (Temporary power) $ 48,000 $ 48,000 $ 301,000 36 2530 18th Street - Homeless Prenatal Program Family Housing (Construction power) $ 93,000 $ 93,000 $ 246,000 37 1979 Mission Street - Tiny Homes Project 246,000$ $ 246,000 $ 191,000 Attachment A2 Projects
Attachment C: Cost Impacts
Other Impacts to
SF
Project Location Redesign
Costs
Primary or Low-
side Metering
Equipment Costs
Additional
Construction
Costs
Additional Costs
to Project for
PG&E retail
service*
Additional
Const./Project
Mgmt. Costs
Due to Delay
Additional
Staff Time
Costs
Upgrades to
PG&E's
Distribution
System
Total
Additional
Project Costs
(B+C+D+E+F+G)
Lost gross
revenue to SFPUC
Additional Costs to Project
38 300 Bartlett Street - Mission Branch Library renovation (Temporary power) $ 93,000 $ 93,000 $ 72,000 39 1515 South Van Ness Avenue - Affordable Housing Development $ 69,000 $ 69,000 $ 224,000 40 2970 16th Street - Affordable Housing (Construction power) $ 1,244,000 $ 1,244,000 $ 3,445,600 41 1236 Carroll Avenue - Temporary Lights and Cameras (for future SFFD $ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ 8,000 42 India Basin - 900 Innes (Construction power) $ - $ 18,000 43 India Basin - Wi-fi Pop-Up $ 24,000 $ 24,000 $ 15,000 44 1035 Gilman Avenue - Bret Harte Elementary (Temporary trailer) $ - 45 500 Hunters Point - Temporary RV Parking for the Unhoused $ - 46 2000 Marin Street - CDD Headquarters Application #1 (Construction Power) $ 727,176 $ 727,176 $ 2,434,287 47 2000 Marin Street - CDD Headquarters Application #2 (Construction Power) $ 161,437 $ 161,437 $ 534,152 48 200 San Andreas Valley Road - Fiber Optic Amplifier $ 25 $ 25 $ 700 49 Streetlights $ -
50 Traffic Controllers $ -
TOTAL $ - $ 670,000 $ 5,240,000 $ 10,490,214 $ - $ - $ 13,083,000 $ 30,051,214 $ 21,466,567 $ 30,051,214
$ 21,466,567
$ 51,517,781
Note: These represent estimates of the costs that the City is aware of at the moment. The projects may incur additional costs going forward.
The projects in RED are projects that are currently at a standstill and may face financial impacts that are TBD depending on how long they will be delayed and how they will move forward. *When calculating "Additional Costs to Project for PG&E retail service", the estimated value is either an annual estimate or for the length of the project (for temporary projects). **The costs for #11 Transbay Transit Center are still being verified. See Attachment A for more details. *** These projects are moving forward under the Voltage Settlement.
Total Cost Impact to SF (Project Costs + Lost Revenue)
Total Additional Project Costs
Total Lost Gross Revenue to SFPUC