Note: This agenda packet was updated at 10 a.m. on February 7, 2022 to include three additional maps (Maps Nos. 111-113) submitted by a member of the public after the posting of this agenda.
Revenue: Expenditure:
Transfer In: Transfer Out:
M E M O R A N D U M
CITY OF CHINO
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2022
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MATTHEW C. BALLANTYNE, CITY MANAGER
JACK MORGAN, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER/
JEFF SIMONETTI AND DOUGLAS JOHNSON , NATIONAL DEMOGRAPHICS
CORPORATION
2021-2022 REDISTRICTING PUBLIC HEARING.
RECOMMENDATION
Consider and discuss the draft maps received by the City and provide direction to staff and National Demographics Corporation.
FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact associated with this action.
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2022
SUBJECT: 2021-2022 REDISTRICTING PROCESS
PAGE 2
BACKGROUND
On July 6, 2021, and September 21, 2021, the Chino City Council held public hearings on the City’s Redistricting process. These public hearings centered on two components. First, these public hearings explained the redistricting process and the laws guiding its procedures. Second, these public hearings provided opportunity to consider, discuss, and define Chino’s neighborhoods and communities of interest as those terms are defined in Assembly Bill (AB) 849 or the FAIR Maps Act.
Then, on December 8, 2021, City staff and National Demographics Corporation (NDC), the City’s redistricting consultant, held a community workshop to revisit the redistricting process while reviewing the City’s public mapping tools.
At the January 18, 2022, public hearing, NDC presented the draft maps. After providing feedback to staff and hearing public comments, the City Council directed staff to co ordinate a public workshop to further analyze the draft maps that are population balanced (those with numerical designations).
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
Maps Received by the City:
In total and as of this writing, the City received 16 maps from the public and NDC. The City greatly appreciates the public for taking the time out of their busy schedules to utilize the public mapping tools and provide invaluable feedback and recommendations . An evaluation of the maps is provided below.
MAPS REQUIRING ADJUSTMENTS:
The received maps attached to this report with alphabetical designations are population imbalanced. As they are currently drawn, they cannot be adopted as a final map while being in conformance with federal law.
However, should the C ouncil and public be interested in exploring any one of these maps, that can certainly happen. It would require adjustments to the proposed district lines (and in some cases very slight adjustments). Moreover, while these maps are population imbalanced, they may inform how specific voting districts or portions of the final voting district map may be drawn.
Maps that are not population balanced (by DistrictR ID):
Map A - DistrictR ID 91823 (not complete)
Map B - DistrictR ID 91901 (not population balanced)
Map C - DistrictR ID 91913 (not population balanced)
Map D - DistrictR ID 96570 (not population balanced)
Map E - DistrictR ID 96927 (not population balanced)
Map F - DistrictR ID 97796 (not population balanced)
Map G - DistrictR ID 99998 (not population balanced)
Map H – Public Participation Paper Map (not population balanced)
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2022
SUBJECT: 2021-2022 REDISTRICTING PROCESS
PAGE 3
MAPS THAT ARE POPULATION BALANCED:
The maps attached to this report with numerical designations are population balanced as required by federal law.
CLARIFICATIONS ON SELECT MAPS SINCE THE LAST PUBLIC HEARING:
MAP 105:
Map 105 (Public Submission with DistrictR ID 100259) is population balanced. However, NDC reviewed Map 105 further since the January 18, 2022, Public Hearing and determined that the makeup of the proposed District Four does not adequately or thoroughly meet the legal definition or measure of “compactness.” Given the concerns NDC expressed after the public hearing, it is not recommended that this map be considered as it is currently drawn. However, if the Council and public would like to redraw the map or incorporate portions of the map into the final voting district map, that can certainly happen.
MAP 108:
Map 108 is a public submission (DistrictR ID 102942) received on January 19, 2022 (after the last public hearing) that NDC has determined is population balanced, meets demograph ic requirements, and is reasonably compact. Therefore, it is being presented.
CONCLUSION:
With the exception of Map 105, the maps below meet the demographic requirements and are reasonably compact. Please see the attached maps for details about the boun daries as well as the demographic data associated with each map. Also, please note that Maps 103, 106, and 108 maintain the City’s Communities of Interest and Neighborhoods as those are currently defined.
With relation to the map submissions and the City’s designated communities of interest – the City received maps from the general public that both kept all of the communities of interest together and split them. Of the population balanced maps received by the public, Maps 108 and 105 keep the communities of interest together (however, as noted above, Map 105 is not recommended as it is currently drawn since it in cludes a proposed district that does not adequately or thoroughly meet the legal definition or measure of “compactness”). Map 107 splits them. In addition, the City directed NDC to provide a variety of draft maps that would either split the communities of interest (Maps 101, 102, and 104) and keep them together (Maps 103 and 106). At the public hearing on January 18th, the City Council received further public testimony on the draft maps. At the hearing, there was no input from the public to change or amend the communities of interest that the City determined in September. As such, draft maps 103, 106 , and 108 keep these communities of interest together in its entirety, and it is NDC’s recommendation to focus on those maps.
NDC Created Maps:
Map 101
Map 102
Map 103
Map 104
Map 106
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2022
SUBJECT: 2021-2022 REDISTRICTING PROCESS
PAGE 4
Citizen Submitted Maps:
Map 105 (DistrictR ID 100259)
Map 107 (DistrictR ID 93160)
Map 108 (DistrictR ID 102942)
Next Steps:
The intent of the workshop is to discuss, provide feedback, and narrow the number of maps to be considered at the next public hearing scheduled for February 15, 2022 (fourth public hearing).
The City Council also could provide the demographer feedback on how to revise a particular map or maps. On February 15 th, it is anticipated that the City Council will select the preferred map.
Then, on March 1st, it is anticipated that staff will bring back an ordinance for introduction adopting the preferred map as the City’s new voting district map with second reading occu rring on March 15th.
The City has until April 17, 2022 to adopt a final voting district map. Additionally, the State has waived the 30-day waiting period for the ordinance to go into effect so the City would need to, at the very latest, conduct the ordinance’s second reading at the April 5, 2022 Regular City Council meeting.
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Population Balanced Maps (Numerical Designations) Exhibit B: Maps Requiring Adjustments (Alphabetical Designations) Exhibit C: 2016 Data for Current Voting Districts (Based on 2010 Census Data) Exhibit D: 2020 Data for Current Voting Districts (Based on 2020 Census Data) Exhibit E: Public Comment received on District Four Makeup
EXHIBIT A
PERSIMMON ST
1 2
3 4
Downtown
Chino
Lower
Density
Park East
The Preserve
College Park
WALNUT
FRANCIS
CHINO
PHILLIPS
EUCALYPTUS
MERRILL
EDISON
SCHAEFER
NORTON
EAST END
MAGNOLIA
YORBA
FERN
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
RIVERSIDE
MOUNTAIN
PIPELINE
EAST END
SAN ANTONIO
RINCONMEADOWS
ROSWELL
TELEPHONE
ROSWELL
WEST PRESERVE
PHILADELPHIA
MOUNTAIN
TELEPHONE
OAKS
MAIN
GRAND
BENSON
MILL CREEK
FOREST
PARK
PIPELINE
YORBA
BENSON
CHINO HILLS
CENTRAL
FERN
VERNON
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL
BICKMORE
RAMONA
FERN
MONTE VISTA
PHILADELPHIA
CHINO CORONA
POMONA RINCON
EAST
PRESERVE
CENTRAL
KIMBALL
CYPRESS
PHILADELPHIA
EUCALYPTUS
EUCLID
CYPRESS
CUCAMONGA
PINE
ROSWELL
EL PRADO
HELLMAN
EUCLID
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
BICKMORE
WEST
PRESERVE
COLLEGE PARK
City of Chino
Legend
Housing Element Sites
Communities of Interest
Current Districts
Proposed Plan 101
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Proposed Redistricting Plan 101
·
0 1 20.5
Miles
District
Number
Total Projected
Population
Growth to 2030
Approximate number of 2020 Registered Voters currently residing in this voting district that will be moved to a different voting district as a result of this proposed map
1 4636 617
2 3007 4346
3 5239 6132
4 15828 2793
TOTALS 28710 13888
PERSIMMON ST
1 2
4 3
Downtown
Chino
Lower
Density
Park East
The Preserve
College Park
WALNUT
FRANCIS
CHINO
PHILLIPS
EUCALYPTUS
MERRILL
EDISON
SCHAEFER
NORTON
EAST END
MAGNOLIA
YORBA
YORBA
FERN
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
RIVERSIDE
MOUNTAIN
PIPELINE
EAST END
SAN ANTONIO
RINCONMEADOWS
ROSWELL
TELEPHONE
ROSWELL
WEST PRESERVE
PHILADELPHIA
MOUNTAIN
TELEPHONE
OAKS
MAIN
GRAND
BENSON
MILL CREEK
FOREST
PARK
PIPELINE
YORBA
BENSON
CHINO HILLS
CENTRAL
FERN
VERNON
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL
BICKMORE
RAMONA
FERN
MONTE VISTA
PHILADELPHIA
CHINO CORONA
POMONA RINCON
EAST
PRESERVE
CENTRAL
KIMBALL
CYPRESS
PHILADELPHIA
EUCALYPTUS
EUCLID
CYPRESS
CUCAMONGA
PINE
ROSWELL
EL PRADO
HELLMAN
EUCLID
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
BICKMORE
WEST
PRESERVE
COLLEGE PARK
City of Chino
Legend
Housing Element Sites
Communities of Interest
Current Districts
Proposed Plan 102
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Proposed Redistricting Plan 102
·
0 1 20.5
Miles
District
Number
Total Projected
Population Growth to
2030
Approximate number of 2020 Registered Voters
currently residing in this voting district that will be moved to a different voting district as a result of this proposed map 1 4575 1190
2 3007 4346
3 14721 7871
4 6407 7585
TOTALS 28710 20992
PERSIMMON ST
1 24
3 Downtown
Chino
Lower
Density
Park East
The Preserve
College Park
WALNUT
FRANCIS
CHINO
PHILLIPS
EUCALYPTUS
MERRILL
EDISON
SCHAEFER
NORTON
EAST END
MAGNOLIA
YORBA
YORBA
FERN
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
RIVERSIDE
MOUNTAIN
PIPELINE
EAST END
SAN ANTONIO
RINCONMEADOWS
ROSWELL
TELEPHONE
ROSWELL
WEST PRESERVE
PHILADELPHIA
MOUNTAIN
TELEPHONE
OAKS
MAIN
GRAND
BENSON
MILL CREEK
FOREST
PARK
PIPELINE
YORBA
BENSON
CHINO HILLS
CENTRAL
FERN
VERNON
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL
BICKMORE
RAMONA
FERN
MONTE VISTA
PHILADELPHIA
CHINO CORONA
POMONA RINCON
EAST
PRESERVE
CENTRAL
KIMBALL
CYPRESS
PHILADELPHIA
EUCALYPTUS
EUCLID
CYPRESS
CUCAMONGA
PINE
ROSWELL
EL PRADO
HELLMAN
EUCLID
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
BICKMORE
WEST
PRESERVE
COLLEGE PARK
City of Chino
Legend
Affordable Housing Overlay
Communities of Interest
Current Districts
Proposed Plan 103
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Proposed Redistricting Plan 103
·
0 1 20.5
Miles
District
Number
Total Projected
Population
Growth to 2030
Approximate number of 2020 Registered Voters
currently residing in this voting district that will be moved to a different voting district as a result of
this proposed map
1 6358 5031
2 4133 1704
3 14721 7871
4 3498 6144
TOTALS 28710 20750
PERSIMMON ST
1 2
3 4
Downtown
Chino
Lower
Density
Park East
The Preserve
College Park
WALNUT
FRANCIS
CHINO
PHILLIPS
EUCALYPTUS
MERRILL
EDISON
SCHAEFER
NORTON
EAST END
MAGNOLIA
YORBA
YORBA
FERN
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
RIVERSIDE
MOUNTAIN
PIPELINE
EAST END
SAN ANTONIO
RINCONMEADOWS
ROSWELL
TELEPHONE
ROSWELL
WEST PRESERVE
PHILADELPHIA
MOUNTAIN
TELEPHONE
OAKS
MAIN
GRAND
BENSON
MILL CREEK
FOREST
PARK
PIPELINE
YORBA
BENSON
CHINO HILLS
CENTRAL
FERN
VERNON
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL
BICKMORE
RAMONA
FERN
MONTE VISTA
PHILADELPHIA
CHINO CORONA
POMONA RINCON
EAST
PRESERVE
CENTRAL
KIMBALL
CYPRESS
PHILADELPHIA
EUCALYPTUS
EUCLID
CYPRESS
CUCAMONGA
PINE
ROSWELL
EL PRADO
HELLMAN
EUCLID
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
BICKMORE
WEST
PRESERVE
COLLEGE PARK
City of Chino
Legend
Housing Element Sites
Communities of Interest
Current Districts
Proposed Plan 104
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Proposed Redistricting Plan 104
·
0 1 20.5
Miles
District
Number
Total Projected
Population
Growth to 2030
Approximate number of 2020 Registered Voters
currently residing in this voting district that will be moved to a different voting district as a result of this proposed map
1 5052 1542
2 3142 4092
3 5239 5607
4 15277 2793
TOTALS 28710 14034
PERSIMMON ST
1 2
3 4
Downtown
Chino
Lower
Density
Park East
The Preserve
College Park
WALNUT
FRANCIS
CHINO
PHILLIPS
EUCALYPTUS
MERRILL
EDISON
SCHAEFER
NORTON
EAST END
MAGNOLIA
YORBA
YORBA
FERN
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
RIVERSIDE
MOUNTAIN
PIPELINE
EAST END
SAN ANTONIO
RINCONMEADOWS
ROSWELL
TELEPHONE
ROSWELL
WEST PRESERVE
PHILADELPHIA
MOUNTAIN
TELEPHONE
OAKS
MAIN
GRAND
BENSON
MILL CREEK
FOREST
PARK
PIPELINE
YORBA
BENSON
CHINO HILLS
CENTRAL
FERN
VERNON
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL
BICKMORE
RAMONA
FERN
MONTE VISTA
PHILADELPHIA
CHINO CORONA
POMONA RINCON
EAST
PRESERVE
CENTRAL
KIMBALL
CYPRESS
PHILADELPHIA
EUCALYPTUS
EUCLID
CYPRESS
CUCAMONGA
PINE
ROSWELL
EL PRADO
HELLMAN
EUCLID
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
BICKMORE
WEST
PRESERVE
COLLEGE PARK
City of Chino
Legend
Affordable Housing Overlay
Communities of Interest
Current Districts
Proposed Plan 105
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Proposed Redistricting Plan 105
·
0 1 20.5
Miles
District
Number
Total Projected
Population
Growth to 2030
A pproximate number of 2020 Registered Voters currently residing in this voting district that will be moved to a different voting district as a result of this proposed map 1 2870 6490
2 4128 5743
3 14721 7871
4 6991 7587
TOTALS 28710 27691
PERSIMMON ST
1 2
4 3
Downtown
Chino
Lower
Density
Park East
The Preserve
College Park
WALNUT
FRANCIS
CHINO
PHILLIPS
EUCALYPTUS
MERRILL
EDISON
SCHAEFER
NORTON
EAST END
MAGNOLIA
YORBA
YORBA
FERN
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
RIVERSIDE
MOUNTAIN
PIPELINE
EAST END
SAN ANTONIO
RINCONMEADOWS
ROSWELL
TELEPHONE
ROSWELL
WEST PRESERVE
PHILADELPHIA
MOUNTAIN
TELEPHONE
OAKS
MAIN
GRAND
BENSON
MILL CREEK
FOREST
PARK
PIPELINE
YORBA
BENSON
CHINO HILLS
CENTRAL
FERN
VERNON
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL
BICKMORE
RAMONA
FERN
MONTE VISTA
PHILADELPHIA
CHINO CORONA
POMONA RINCON
EAST
PRESERVE
CENTRAL
KIMBALL
CYPRESS
PHILADELPHIA
EUCALYPTUS
EUCLID
CYPRESS
CUCAMONGA
PINE
ROSWELL
EL PRADO
HELLMAN
EUCLID
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
BICKMORE
WEST
PRESERVE
COLLEGE PARK
City of Chino
Legend
Housing Element Sites
Communities of Interest
Current Districts
Proposed Plan 106
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Proposed Redistricting Plan 106
·
0 1 20.5
Miles
District
Number
Total Projected
Population
Growth to 2030
A pproximate number of 2020 Registered Voters currently residing in this voting district that will be moved to a different voting district as a result of this proposed map 1 3681 7485
2 6471 2642
3 15061 7823
4 3498 6144
TOTALS 28710 24094
PERSIMMON ST
1 2
4 3
Downtown
Chino
Lower
Density
Park East
The Preserve
College Park
WALNUT
FRANCIS
CHINO
PHILLIPS
EUCALYPTUS
MERRILL
EDISON
SCHAEFER
NORTON
EAST END
MAGNOLIA
YORBA
YORBA
FERN
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
RIVERSIDE
MOUNTAIN
PIPELINE
EAST END
SAN ANTONIO
RINCONMEADOWS
ROSWELL
TELEPHONE
ROSWELL
WEST PRESERVE
PHILADELPHIA
MOUNTAIN
TELEPHONE
OAKS
MAIN
GRAND
BENSON
MILL CREEK
FOREST
PARK
PIPELINE
YORBA
BENSON
CHINO HILLS
CENTRAL
FERN
VERNON
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL
BICKMORE
RAMONA
FERN
MONTE VISTA
PHILADELPHIA
CHINO CORONA
POMONA RINCON
EAST
PRESERVE
CENTRAL
KIMBALL
CYPRESS
PHILADELPHIA
EUCALYPTUS
EUCLID
CYPRESS
CUCAMONGA
PINE
ROSWELL
EL PRADO
HELLMAN
EUCLID
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
BICKMORE
WEST
PRESERVE
COLLEGE PARK
City of Chino
Legend
Affordable Housing Overlay
Communities of Interest
Current Districts
Proposed Plan 107
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Proposed Redistricting Plan 107
·
0 1 20.5
Miles
District
Number
Total Projected
Population
Growth to 2030
Approximate number of 2020 Registered Voters currently
residing in this voting district that will be moved to a different voting district as a result of this proposed map 1 4396 9263
2 5948 5324
3 14721 7871
4 3645 6146
TOTALS 28710 28604
PERSIMMON ST
1 2
4 3
Downtown
Chino
Lower
Density
Park East
The Preserve
College Park
WALNUT
FRANCIS
CHINO
PHILLIPS
EUCALYPTUS
MERRILL
EDISON
SCHAEFER
NORTON
EAST END
MAGNOLIA
YORBA
YORBA
FERN
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
RIVERSIDE
MOUNTAIN
PIPELINE
EAST END
SAN ANTONIO
RINCONMEADOWS
ROSWELL
TELEPHONE
ROSWELL
WEST PRESERVE
PHILADELPHIA
MOUNTAIN
TELEPHONE
OAKS
MAIN
GRAND
BENSON
MILL CREEK
FOREST
PARK
PIPELINE
YORBA
BENSON
CHINO HILLS
CENTRAL
FERN
VERNON
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL
BICKMORE
RAMONA
FERN
MONTE VISTA
PHILADELPHIA
CHINO CORONA
POMONA RINCON
EAST
PRESERVE
CENTRAL
KIMBALL
CYPRESS
PHILADELPHIA
EUCALYPTUS
EUCLID
CYPRESS
CUCAMONGA
PINE
ROSWELL
EL PRADO
HELLMAN
EUCLID
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
BICKMORE
WEST
PRESERVE
COLLEGE PARK
City of Chino
Legend
Housing Element Sites
Communities of Interest
Current Districts
Proposed Plan 108
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Proposed Redistricting Plan 108
·
0 1 20.5
Miles
District
Number
Total Projected
Population
Growth to 2030
Approximate number of 2020 Registered Voters currently
residing in this voting district that will be moved to a different voting district as a result of this proposed map 1 3891 9586
2 5211 9272
3 14721 7871
4 4887 7587
TOTALS 28710 34316
Exhibit B – Maps that are not
Population Balanced
Exhibit B
Map A (DistrictR ID 91823)
Exhibit B
Map B (DistrictR ID 91901)
Exhibit B
Map C (DistrictR ID 91913)
Exhibit B
Map D (DistrictR ID 96570)
Exhibit B
Map E (DistrictR ID 96927)
Exhibit B
Map F (DistrictR ID 97796):
Exhibit B
Map G (DistrictR ID 99998):
Chino Redistricting 2021
Public Participation Kit
Total Population by Population Unit
Each number indicates the
total population of that
"population unit" area. Each
district must have essentiall y
equal population. The population
279
of each of the 4 districts must be
close to 21,640, with no more than a
2,164 difference between the largest
and smallest.
An online version of this map that
allows you to zoom in and out for
more detail is available as a link
from the city website.
,37
,03
4 0
Kimb all Av~
©2021 CALIPER
olored pen to draw your
map, then submit it at
City Hall or by email to
districts@ci tyofchino .org.
You can hand deliver, maiI,
fax, scan and email, or
photograph and email
your map.
+
1,368 737
n
5" 2,916
0 0 n :> 0 < 8 C ::, ~
I>)
;;,::, ::::I p_. 0
::c
53 41
District 1 2 3 4 Total
Total Pop 18,294 18,203 17,389 17,521 71,407
Deviation from ideal 442 351 -463 -331 905
% Deviation 2.48% 1.97% -2.59% -1.85% 5.07%
% Hisp 65% 47% 62% 47% 55%
% NH White 24% 34% 23% 29% 28%
% NH Black 3% 5% 4% 5% 4%
% Asian-American 7% 13% 9% 18% 11%
Total 13,228 13,596 12,391 12,567 51,782
% Hisp 60% 43% 58% 43% 51%
% NH White 28% 37% 26% 33% 31%
% NH Black 4% 5% 5% 5% 5%
% Asian-American 7% 13% 10% 18% 12%
Total 10,792 11,946 10,756 11,867 45,360
% Hisp 59% 44% 56% 42% 50%
% NH White 28% 39% 25% 35% 32%
% NH Black 2% 5% 5% 6% 5%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 9% 12% 13% 17% 12%
Total 7,343 9,257 7,005 7,940 31,545
% Latino 55% 43% 52% 41% 47%
% Asian-Surnamed 3% 4% 4% 7% 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2% 3% 2% 2% 2%
Total 2,478 3,351 2,285 2,659 10,774
% Latino 45% 35% 41% 31% 38%
% Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 4% 5% 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Total 5,154 6,810 4,820 5,517 22,300
% Latino 49% 40% 47% 39% 43%
% Asian-Surnamed 2% 3% 3% 5% 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 17,653 17,728 17,620 17,550 70,552
age0-19 29% 29% 27% 28% 28%
age20-60 56% 57% 61% 60% 58%
age60plus 15% 14% 12% 13% 14%
immigrants 23% 21% 25% 24% 23%
naturalized 53% 56% 48% 60% 54%
english 53% 57% 48% 56% 54%
spanish 39% 32% 42% 29% 36%
asian-lang 6% 8% 6% 12% 8%
other lang 1% 3% 3% 2% 2%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well" 16% 13% 20% 13% 15%
hs-grad 59% 56% 56% 58% 57%
bachelor 14% 19% 12% 20% 16%
graduatedegree 5% 8% 5% 7% 6%
Child in Household child-under18 37% 39% 43% 42% 40%
employed 60% 62% 52% 58% 58%
Commute on Public
Transit 1% 2% 2% 1% 2%
income 0-25k 18% 13% 17% 14% 15%
income 25-50k 19% 17% 15% 15% 16%
income 50-75k 23% 19% 23% 19% 21%
income 75-200k 36% 47% 41% 48% 43%
income 200k-plus 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
single family 75% 84% 82% 78% 80%
multi-family 25% 16% 18% 22% 20%
vacant 5% 5% 5% 9% 6%
occupied 95% 95% 95% 91% 94%
rented 36% 27% 33% 30% 31%
owned 64% 73% 67% 70% 69%
Total and Voting Age population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Housing Stats
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5-year data.
Citizen Voting Age
Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2014)
Age
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2012)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2014)
Work (percent of
pop age 16+)
Household Income
Education (among
those age 25+)
Total Pop
City of Chino - Council-Preferred Map
Language spoken at
home
Voting Age Pop
This was the data presented
to the City when the current
voting districts were adopted
in 2016.
The data is based on the
2010 Cenus.
Exhibit C
Chino Current Official Data
District 1
Total Pop 18,131
Deviation from ideal -3,512
% Deviation -16.23%
% Hisp 66.8%
% NH White 18%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 10%
Total 11,640
% Hisp 59%
% NH White 25%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 10%
Total 9,586
% Latino est. 59%
% Spanish-Surnamed 53%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 34%
% NH Black 5%
Total 7,527
% Latino est. 57%
% Spanish-Surnamed 52%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 36%
% NH Black 5%
Total 4,774
% Latino est. 53%
% Spanish-Surnamed 49%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 40%
% NH Black est. 5%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 17,288
age0-19 24%
age20-60 57%
age60plus 19%
immigrants 23%
naturalized 53%
english 50%
spanish 41%
asian-lang 7%
other lang 2%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 20%
hs-grad 48%
bachelor 11%
graduatedegree 5%
Child in Household child-under18 37%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 66%
income 0-25k 18%
income 25-50k 21%
income 50-75k 21%
income 75-200k 35%
income 200k-plus 6%
single family 70%
multi-family 30%
rented 49%
owned 51%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 19,453
-2,190
-10.12%
50%
25%
4%
19%
12,621
49%
34%
4%
12%
11,894
47%
42%
8%
3%
41%
5%
9,778
46%
42%
7%
3%
43%
5%
6,540
43%
39%
5%
2%
48%
5%
17,694
24%
56%
20%
22%
60%
62%
28%
8%
2%
15%
48%
19%
7%
35%
65%
10%
16%
15%
51%
9%
85%
15%
28%
72%
3 23,308
1,665
7.69%
53%
16%
4%
24%
15,079
42%
28%
10%
18%
11,730
49%
44%
12%
3%
33%
6%
9,377
47%
43%
12%
3%
34%
7%
5,528
44%
41%
7%
2%
40%
6%
23,369
21%
63%
16%
28%
41%
55%
33%
10%
2%
18%
48%
15%
6%
45%
47%
13%
15%
17%
48%
7%
78%
22%
36%
64%
4 25,681
4,038
18.66%
42%
21%
8%
26%
13,310
40%
30%
5%
25%
13,618
42%
38%
11%
3%
40%
6%
11,039
41%
37%
10%
3%
41%
6%
5,939
38%
35%
7%
3%
47%
6%
20,871
28%
57%
15%
24%
55%
57%
23%
18%
3%
16%
44%
22%
12%
44%
68%
10%
12%
18%
50%
9%
76%
24%
37%
63%
Total
86,573
7,550
34.88%
52%
20%
5%
21%
52,651
47%
29%
6%
16%
46,828
48%
44%
9%
3%
37%
5%
37,721
47%
43%
9%
3%
39%
6%
22,781
44%
41%
6%
2%
44%
5%
79,222
24%
58%
17%
24%
51%
56%
31%
11%
2%
17%
47%
17%
7%
40%
60%
13%
16%
17%
46%
8%
78%
22%
37%
63%
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
Based on Current
Voting Districts using
2020 Census Data
Exhibit D
From:
To: Chino Districts
Subject: [EXT EMAIL] Redistricting
Date: Thursday, August 5, 2021 8:54:32 PM
Hello,
I was writing in regarding the re-districting of our city. I would highly recommend that the City evaluate how district 4 includes the preserve and homes on the complete opposite end of the city in areas like walnut and pipeline.
Residents on the south end of chino should not be represented with those located in the northern part of the city.
They are milws apart and have needs that are on complete opposite ends of the spectrum. You have half the district represented by new homes and Neighbors’s while the others are in areas that are underserved and aging.
Please correct this issue. Us on the north end do not want our council member representing us from the opposite end of the city.
Thanks
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify sender email.
If unknown, DO NOT open links/attachments. NEVER give out your user ID or password for any reason!
'
Exhibit E
PERSIMMON ST
3 2
1 4
Downtown
Chino
Lower
Density
Park East
The Preserve
College Park
WALNUT
FRANCIS
CHINO
PHILLIPS
EUCALYPTUS
MERRILL
EDISON
SCHAEFER
NORTON
EAST END
MAGNOLIA
YORBA
YORBA
FERN
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
RIVERSIDE
MOUNTAIN
PIPELINE
EAST END
SAN ANTONIO
RINCONMEADOWS
ROSWELL
TELEPHONE
ROSWELL
WEST PRESERVE
PHILADELPHIA
MOUNTAIN
TELEPHONE
OAKS
MAIN
GRAND
BENSON
MILL CREEK
FOREST
PARK
PIPELINE
YORBA
BENSON
CHINO HILLS
CENTRAL
FERN
VERNON
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL
BICKMORE
RAMONA
FERN
MONTE VISTA
PHILADELPHIA
CHINO CORONA
POMONA RINCON
EAST
PRESERVE
CENTRAL
KIMBALL
CYPRESS
PHILADELPHIA
EUCALYPTUS
EUCLID
CYPRESS
CUCAMONGA
PINE
ROSWELL
EL PRADO
HELLMAN
EUCLID
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
BICKMORE
WEST
PRESERVE
COLLEGE PARK
City of Chino
Legend
Housing Element Sites
Communities of Interest
Current Districts
Proposed Plan 111
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Proposed Redistricting Plan 111
·
0 1 20.5
Miles
PERSIMMON ST
2 1
4 3
Downtown
Chino
Lower
Density
Park East
The Preserve
College Park
WALNUT
FRANCIS
CHINO
PHILLIPS
EUCALYPTUS
MERRILL
EDISON
SCHAEFER
NORTON
EAST END
MAGNOLIA
YORBA
YORBA
FERN
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
RIVERSIDE
MOUNTAIN
PIPELINE
EAST END
SAN ANTONIO
RINCONMEADOWS
ROSWELL
TELEPHONE
ROSWELL
WEST PRESERVE
PHILADELPHIA
MOUNTAIN
TELEPHONE
OAKS
MAIN
GRAND
BENSON
MILL CREEK
FOREST
PARK
PIPELINE
YORBA
BENSON
CHINO HILLS
CENTRAL
FERN
VERNON
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL
BICKMORE
RAMONA
FERN
MONTE VISTA
PHILADELPHIA
CHINO CORONA
POMONA RINCON
EAST
PRESERVE
CENTRAL
KIMBALL
CYPRESS
PHILADELPHIA
EUCALYPTUS
EUCLID
CYPRESS
CUCAMONGA
PINE
ROSWELL
EL PRADO
HELLMAN
EUCLID
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
BICKMORE
WEST
PRESERVE
COLLEGE PARK
City of Chino
Legend
Housing Element Sites
Communities of Interest
Current Districts
Proposed Plan 112
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Proposed Redistricting Plan 112
·
0 1 20.5
Miles
PERSIMMON ST
2 1 3
4 Downtown
Chino
Lower
Density
Park East
The Preserve
College Park
WALNUT
FRANCIS
CHINO
PHILLIPS
EUCALYPTUS
MERRILL
EDISON
SCHAEFER
NORTON
EAST END
MAGNOLIA
YORBA
YORBA
FERN
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
RIVERSIDE
MOUNTAIN
PIPELINE
EAST END
SAN ANTONIO
RINCONMEADOWS
ROSWELL
TELEPHONE
ROSWELL
WEST PRESERVE
PHILADELPHIA
MOUNTAIN
TELEPHONE
OAKS
MAIN
GRAND
BENSON
MILL CREEK
FOREST
PARK
PIPELINE
YORBA
BENSON
CHINO HILLS
CENTRAL
FERN
VERNON
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL
BICKMORE
RAMONA
FERN
MONTE VISTA
PHILADELPHIA
CHINO CORONA
POMONA RINCON
EAST
PRESERVE
CENTRAL
KIMBALL
CYPRESS
PHILADELPHIA
EUCALYPTUS
EUCLID
CYPRESS
CUCAMONGA
PINE
ROSWELL
EL PRADO
HELLMAN
EUCLID
SAN ANTONIO
NORTON
BICKMORE
WEST
PRESERVE
COLLEGE PARK
City of Chino
Legend
Housing Element Sites
Communities of Interest
Current Districts
Proposed Plan 113
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Proposed Redistricting Plan 113
·
0 1 20.5
Miles