NOTICE AND CALL OF SPECIAL MEETING
CHINO CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of the Chino City Council / Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency will be held on Tuesday, September 20, 2022, at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at 13220 Central Avenue, Chino, CA.
Those persons wishing to speak on any item included on the agenda, or on any matter within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, are invited fill out and submit to the City C lerk a “Request to Speak” f orm (name and addre ss optional) which is a vailable a t the e ntrance to the City Council Chambers .
Additionally, members of the public may submit electronic inquiries or comments by submitting emails to [email protected]
If you require a reasonable accommodation to participate in this meeting per your rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act or for any other reason, please contact the C ity Clerk’s Office (909) 334 -3306, at l east 48 hours prior to the advertised starting time of the meeting.
Any documents produced by the City and distributed to a majority of the City Counc il regarding any item on this agenda will be made available in the City Clerk’s Office during normal business hours at City H all located at 13220 Central Avenue, Chino. In addition, such documents will be posted on the City’s website at www.cityofchino.org.
CHINO CITY COUNCIL
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
WORKSHOP – CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
13220 CENTRAL AVENUE
CHINO, CA 91710
TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 20, 2022
4:00 PM
AGENDA
ROLL CALL
Mayor Eunice M. Ulloa, Mayor Pro Tem Marc Lucio, Council Mem ber Karen C. Comstock, Council Member Christopher Flores, Council Member Walt Pocock.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time and place for the public to addres s the City C ouncil regarding the items listed on the agenda . Ordinance No. 97-08 (Chino M unicipal Code Section
2.04.090) limits speakers t o no more than five (5) min utes in whic h to address the Council.
CHINO CITY COUNCIL
SEPTEMBER 20, 2022 2
DISCUSSION
1. Pavement Management System Software Program (M S-212). Receive a report stemming from the pavement management system software program and provide direction to staff.
Staff Report by: Amer Jakher, Public Works Director and Felicia Marsh all, Associate Civil Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file a report on pavement cond itions and associated data, and provide direction to staff.
M _____ S _____ RC _____
2. Citywide Leg islative Policy . Discuss changes to the existing Citywide Legislative Policy and provide direction to staff.
Staff Report by: Jack Morgan, Assistant to the City Manager.
RECOMMENDATION: Discuss changes to the exist ing Citywide Legislative Policy and provi de direction to staff.
M _____ S _____ RC _____
3. Street Sweeping Parking Restricti ons and Enforcement Update . Receive an update on staff's proposal to implement the Street Swe eping Parking Restrictions Enfo rcement Pro gram and provide direction to staff.
Staff Report by: David McAbee, Public Works Services Manager.
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file a report on staff's intentions to implement the Street Sweeping Parking Restrictions Enforcement Program, and provide direction to staff.
M _____ S _____ RC _____
ADJOURN
The next Regular Meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday , September 20, 2022 at 7:00 p.m. (Closed Session at 6:00 p.m.) in these Council Chambers.
I, Angela Robles, City Cle rk of the City of Chino, hereby declare that on Wednesday, September 14, 2022, this agenda was posted on the south window of Chino City Hall and this agenda together with al l of the ag enda reports and related documents were posted on the City’s website at www.cityofchino.org by myself or under my direction.
Revenue: Expenditure:
Transfer In: Transfer Out:
M E M O R A N D U M
CITY OF CHINO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2022
TO: LINDA REICH, CITY MANAGER
FROM: AMER JAKHER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SOFTWARE PROGRAM (MS-212).
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file a report on pavement conditions and associated data, and provide direction to staff.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact from this update.
CITY OF CHINO MISSION / VISION / VALUES / STRATEGIC ISSUES:
The recommendation detailed above further the City’s values and strategic issues that serve as key pillars on which identified priorities, goals, and action plans are built, by fostering:
• Positive City Image
• Responsible Long-Range Planning
• Public Service Excellence Through Internal & External Partnerships
3.1 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 3
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2022
SUBJECT: PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SOFTWARE PROGRAM (MS-212) PAGE 2
BACKGROUND
As part of the Fiscal Year 2020 -21 Budget, the City Council authorized staff to develop a Pavement Management System Software Program. The purp ose of this program is to catalog the City’s vast network of streets, evaluate their condition, and allow staff to use the data to make recommendations to the City Council on resources required to keep street systems in an acceptable condition.
Council authorized staff to retain a consultant, and with staff’s assistance, the consultant has developed the paving recommendations included in the presentation that will be issued to the City Council (Attached as Exhibit A).
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
This program is inten ded to achieve a vital City goal. By cataloging street conditions and developing this report, the City may prioritize and scope street improvement needs. This will help the City manage and deploy its resources more effectively and with a holistic framework in mind. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council review the presentation materials prepared by staff and the consultant, and at its conclusion, provide direction to City staff.
Attachment: Exhibit A (Note: As staff continues to work through t he presentation material with the consultant, there may be minor adjustments since the posting of the agenda.)
3.1 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 4
2022 – “State of the Streets”
City of Chino, CA
Jim Tourek and Sadaf Khosravifar, PhD, PE
IMS Infrastructure Management Services, LP
Date: Sep 20th 2022
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 5
Project Goals
● Implement StreetLogix pavement management system
● Perform a comprehensive pavement condition survey
● Evaluate the impact of the City’s existing funding level on future pavement conditions over the next 5 years
● Determine funding levels required to:
✓ Maintain current pavement conditions
✓ Increase overall pavement conditions
✓ Eliminate the City’s existing rehabilitation and reconstruction backlog ● Recommend pavement preservation and rehabilitation projects
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 6
Pavement Condition Survey
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 7
Pavement Condition Survey
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 8
Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
SDI
PCI = 2/3 SDI + 1/3 RI
Roughness Index (RI) : measure of ride quality
based on International Roughness Index (IRI)
(ASTM E1926)
Surface Distress Index (SDI): measure of surface
conditions (ASTM D6433)
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 9
Street Logix
● Manage pavement inventory
● Predict future pavement
conditions
● Perform Budget Analysis
● Develop pavement
Maintenance and
Rehabilitation (M&R) projects
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 10
Pavement Management Concepts
Time
Pavement Quality
has a 15% drop in quality
15% of pavement life
$1 spent now
Costs $8 if delayed
Very Good
Good
Very Poor
Poor
Excellent
Fair
40% of pavement life
has a 40% drop in quality
(About 20 years)
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 11
Pavement Management Concepts
Time
Pavement Quality
Target Zone for Pavement Rehabilitation
Pavement Life Cycle Curve
Increased Pavement Life
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 12
Condition Data
Results
Condition = Excellent (85 – 100) | PCI = 98
El Prado Road
Distress: No Distresses
Recommended Activity: Preventive Maintenance
SDI 100
RI 95
PCI 98
GISID: 2610
From: ALTON ST
To: GATES ST
EL PRADO ROAD
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 13
Condition Data
Results
Condition = Very Good (70 – 85) | PCI = 72
ADAMS CT
Distress: Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking
Recommended Activity: Surface Treatment
SDI 79
RI 58
PCI 72
GISID: 2859
From: BENTLEY PL
To: VERNON AVE
ADAMS CT
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 14
Condition Data
Results
Condition = Good (60 - 70) | PCI = 70
Yorkshire Road
Distress: Low L&T and Weathering, Alligator Cracking
Recommended Activity: Crack Sealing and Surface Treatment SDI 80
RI 50
PCI 70
GISID: 3103
From: OAKS AVE
To: SYCAMORE LN
YORKSHIRE ROAD
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 15
Condition Data
Results
Condition = Fair (50-60) | PCI = 60
EAST VAN HORN CIR
Distress: Low & Moderate L&T
Recommended Activity: Moderate mill and overlay
SDI 73
RI 37
PCI 61
GISID: 4238
From: JOSE ST
To: WEST VAN HORN CIR
EAST VAN HORN CIR
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 16
Condition Data
Results
Condition = Marginal (40-50) | PCI = 50
RAMONA AVE
Distress: L&T, Alligator, Edge Cracking, Patching, Rutting Recommended Activity: Thick mill and overlay with patching SDI 43
RI 65
PCI 50
GISID: 4357
From: NORTE AVE
To: CHINO CRK
RAMONA AVE
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 17
Condition Data
Results
Condition = Poor (25-40) | PCI = 27
SEMINOLE DR
Distress: Alligator cracking, Edge Cracking, Raveling, Pothole, Rutting Activity: Surface Reconstruction
SDI 16
RI 50
PCI 27
GISID: 2360
From: SCHAEFER AVE
To: CHEYENNE WAY
SEMINOLE DR
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 18
Condition Data
Results
Condition = Very Poor (0 -25) | PCI = 21
WALNUT AVE
Distress: Severe Alligator cracking, L&T, Edge Cracking, potholes Activity: Reconstruction
SDI 7
RI 49
PCI 21
GISID: 3012
From: CITY LIMIT
To: SAN ANTONIO WSH
WALNUT AVE
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 19
Condition Data Results (as of September 2022)
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 45
V Poor (0 to 25) Poor (25 to 40) Marginal (40 to 50) Fair (50 to 60) Good (60 to 70) V Good (70 to 85) Excellent (85 to 100) Percentage of Network By Area
Current Pavement Condition Using Descriptive Terms
Current Network Average Condition = 70, Backlog = 5.3% Current PCI Date = 9/1/22
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 20
Condition Data
Results (as of
September 2022)
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 21
5-Year Budget
Analysis
Estimated Annual Fund for Paving
Slurry (General Fund) 1,500,000
Overlay (General Fund) 1,500,000
RMRA Funds 2,000,000
Measure I Funds 1,600,000
Waste Management Fund
(Alley Paving) – not included in the analysis 800,000
Total 7,400,000
Current Estimated funding for Pavement Related
Activities (excluding funding required for concrete
work and Alleys)
4,000,000
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 22
5-Year Budget
Analysis Results
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 85
90 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 Post Rehab Network Average Condition
Annual Budget Each Year for Five Years ($1,000/Yr)
2022 to 2026 Rehab Analysis Results
Chino, CA Budget: PCI = 68, Backlog = 11%, Annual Budget = $4000k/Yr Steady State PCI: Final PCI = 70, Backlog = 8%, Annual Budget = $6600k/Yr Target PCI Driven Budget: PCI = 75, Backlog = 2%, Annual Budget = $14450k/Yr Current PCI = 70 (2022)
City of Chino, CA
Five Year Post Rehab PCI Versus Annual Budget
Analysis Start Date = 9/1/2022
Analysis Period 2022 to 2026
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 23
5-Year Budget
Analysis Results
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 24
Pavement Management Recommendations
1. Continue and enhance preservation techniques such as crack sealing, rejuvenator, slurry Seal, microsurfacing, and localized patching as funding becomes available
2. The current budget is expected to maintain the current conditions over the next 5 years
3. Increase the annual spending on pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects to improve the overall pavement conditions in the City
4. Update pavement management system
○ Perform routine pavement condition inspections, every 2‐3 years ○ Update inputs (rehab strategies and unit costs, deterioration models, etc.)
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 25
5-Year Budget
Analysis Results
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 85
90 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 Post Rehab Network Average Condition
Annual Budget Each Year for Five Years ($1,000/Yr)
Chino, CA Budget: PCI = 68, Backlog = 11%, Annual Budget = $4000k/Yr Steady State PCI: Final PCI = 70, Backlog = 8%, Annual Budget = $6600k/Yr Target PCI Driven Budget: PCI = 75, Backlog = 2%, Annual Budget = $14450k/Yr Current PCI = 70 (2022)
City of Chino, CA
Five Year Post Rehab PCI Versus Annual Budget
Analysis Start Date = 9/1/2022
Analysis Period 2022 to 2026
3.1.a
Pavement Management System Software Program (MS-
Packet Pg. 26
Revenue: Expenditure:
Transfer In: Transfer Out:
M E M O R A N D U M
CITY OF CHINO
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2022
TO: LINDA REICH, CITY MANAGER
FROM: JACK MORGAN, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CITYWIDE LEGISLATIVE POLICY.
RECOMMENDATION
Discuss changes to the existing Citywide Legislative Policy and provide direction to staff.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
3.2 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 27
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2022
SUBJECT: CITYWIDE LEGISLATIVE POLICY
PAGE 2
BACKGROUND
On February 15, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022 -013, approving the current Citywide Legislative Policy. At the July 19, 2022 City Council meeting, proposed changes to the current policy’s signature authority and legislation review protocols were submitted for City Council consideration and approval.
The City Council directed staff to bring the item back at a future workshop for further discussion.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
While the City of Chino can certainly create a unique legislative advocacy program, to help provide options or ideas, staff sampled other local legislative adv ocacy programs in Riverside, Orange, Los Angeles, and San Bernardino counties. The agencies included Chino Hills, Ontario, Riverside, Murrieta, Pasadena, Burbank, Newport Beach, and Huntington Beach.
These agencies have adopted respective legislative advo cacy programs that create a continuum in how they review legislation and communicate official positions. Some agencies provide an exhaustive legislative priorities list (Pasadena) while others simply rely on overarching principles via their strategic plan (Huntington Beach).
As a matter of comparison, it is helpful to bifurcate these legislative advocacy programs into “policy areas” and “protocols.” Where the former centers on policy matters, the latter focuses on how official City positions are communicated and reviewed.
Policy Areas:
Guiding Principles
Apart from Huntington Beach, every city surveyed has guiding principles and specific policy areas included in their legislative advocacy program s. Often these are codified in a city “Legislative Platform” o r “Legislative Policy.” In general, seemingly all the surveyed cities have guiding principles that focus on local control and fiscal stability. The phrase “fiscal stability” is used more frequently; however, as in the City of Chino’s case, other references to public finance or revenues in the guiding principles generally emphasize the same concept – a concerted effort to protect local revenue sources to ensure municipal operations.
Beyond these two guiding principles, some agencies list quality of life, pr ivate property rights, innovation, trust, equity, sustainability/resiliency, and opposition to unfunded mandates. Chino’s current principles include: “Preserve Local Control, Protect and Expand Local Funding and Public Finance, and Enhance Quality of Life.”
While some of the other guiding principles could arguably be inclusive of Chino’s existing guiding principles (i.e., opposing unfunded mandates could be associated with local control and protecting/expanding local funding and public finance), it may be beneficial to include additional overarching guidelines that address other important matters (e.g., funding opportunities).
Policy Areas
Policy areas take the guiding principles concept further and identify those specific issues where the City may want to communicate a formal position. One of the more common areas in the surveyed cities is an insistence that the State provide support with affordable housing. Likewise, there is a general effort to assist with alleviating the homeless crisis as well as maint aining control over labor/employee relations. Additionally, some agencies identify local issues specific
3.2 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 28
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2022
SUBJECT: CITYWIDE LEGISLATIVE POLICY
PAGE 3
to their region and community. For example, Burbank and Newport Beach list airport control and related mitigation measures (i.e., Burbank Airport and John Wayne Airport).
Of the surveyed cities (aside from Huntington Beach), Pasadena adopted the most detailed and comprehensive “policy areas” where Burbank tended to be a high-level overview.
Protocols:
Protocols refer to the process each agency follows to establish and communicate an official city position. Apart from Huntington Beach, the agencies utilize their adopted legislative policies/platforms as a guide to take an official position. However, the protocols identified with each agency can generally fall into three categories: 1) “Communicate Official Stance without City Council or Committee Approval,” 2) “Requires Approval if there is any Ambiguity” and 3) “Communicate Official Stance after City Council or Committee Approval.” Each category is discussed in turn.
Communicate Official Stance without City Council or Committee Approval:
After adopting a citywide legislative platform/p olicy, some cities have authorized their staff to draft position letters, obtain signatures, and deliver these position letters without the City Council formerly approving a particular letter or communication (Ontario, Newport Beach, Riverside, and Burbank). In all instances, this practice is qualified with the understanding that staff will communicate a formal position cons istent with the adopted platform /policy. If a matter falls outside the legislative policy/platform, then this will be brought to the City Council for consideration/review. Moreover, in one instance, it was noted that staff will forward the proposed letter to the City Council for informational purposes, and then to the Mayor.
However, it should be noted that some agencies have created standing committees to help craft an annual legislative platform /policy as well. The proposed platform /policy is then taken t o the entire City Council for approval.
Murrieta’s model fits this practice well. Murrieta has established a “Legislative Workgroup” (“Workgroup”). The Workgroup refines the city’s legislative platform/policy annually. The Workgroup then presents the fina l version to the City Council for consideration. If acceptable, the Murrieta City Council will approve the platform/policy, and going froward, Murrieta staff is authorized to advocate or draft letters for their Mayor’s signature accordingly.
Requires Approval if there is any Ambiguity:
Pasadena’s model is nuanced. Like Murrieta, Pasadena has a dedicated committee entitled the Legislative Policy Committee (“LPC”). The LPC creates and recommends an annual legislative platform/policy. Once adopted by the enti re City Council, Pasadena staff may advocate in accordance with the adopted platform/policy. Deference to staff is extended when legislation is objectively congruent with the platform/policy or there is an urgent matter (i.e., “gut and amend” legislation).
According to Pasadena staff, if there is uncertainty whether a proposed bill aligns with the platform/policy or if the proposed bill is potentially controversial, then staff brings the bill to the LPC for approval. If needed, t he LPC may determine it would like to present the matter to the entire Pasadena City Council at a regular meeting.
Likewise, Chino Hills has a similar approach. They have created the “Legislative Advocacy Committee” (“LAC”). In practice, Chino Hills staff utilizes its adopted legis lative platform to determine if support/opposition letters will be issued. Legislative updates are given to the LAC and department heads monthly ; however, if a proposed piece of legislation is outside the
3.2 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 29
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2022
SUBJECT: CITYWIDE LEGISLATIVE POLICY
PAGE 4
platform guidelines or may be nuanced enough to pro mpt further discussion, then that piece of legislation is brought to the LAC, and if necessary, also to the Chino Hills City Council.
Communicate Official Stance after City Council and/or Committee Approval:
Huntington Beach’s model provides for an entirely inclusive legislative review process. The city has established a standing committee entitled the “Intergovernmental Relations Committee” (“IRC”). The IRC has three members appointed by the Huntington Beach Mayor. The IRC reviews and studies all pendin g legislation as well as funding opportunities. If the IRC determines it is warranted for the city to communicate an official position, the IRC will recommend a formal position to the entire Huntington Beach City Council. Should the Huntington Beach City C ouncil approve the IRC recommendation, then a letter signed by the Mayor is issued in support or opposition.
Possible Options for Chino to Facilitate Further Review:
In drawing upon the above practices, provided below are a few options to help facilitate discussion.
Option One:
The City Council could adopt the Citywide Legislative policy to serve as a framework for staff to identify consequential pieces of legislation. After identifying those pieces of legislation, City staff can bring those matters to th e City Council at a regular meeting for discussion and direction on how to proceed.
Option Two:
The City Council adopts the Citywide legislative policy to serve as a framework and then establishes a standing legislative advocacy committee with reoccurring meeting times and published agendas. This committee could be tasked to formulate and deliver official City positions. The committee could forward a decision to the City Council if it is deemed necessary by the committee. Likewise, periodic updates (e.g., quarterly) on the committee’s efforts may be delivered to the entire City Council during its regular City Council meetings.
Option Three:
The City Council adopts the Citywide legislative policy to serve as a framework and adopts a process like Huntington Beach where a standing committee is created to formulate official stances on proposed legislation for City Council consideration.
Conclusion:
The above options are solely listed for purposes of promoting discussion. These options certainly do no t represent an exhaustive list of alternatives available to the City Council.
However, after obtaining City Council feedback/direction, staff will bring back a revised policy for City Council consideration and adoption.
Lastly, it should be noted that if the City Council opts to create a standing committee, this committee will be a Brown Act body. Like the above agencies’ practice, this means that a regular meeting schedule will be adopted, committee agendas will be published, and all meetings will be held in a publicly accessible facility (likely the City Council chambers).
Attachment: Current Citywide Legislative Policy
3.2 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 30
Administrative Policy
Citywide Legislative Policy
I. Purpose Statement
To address legislative and regulatory concerns in a timely manner, this Citywide Legislative Policy details guiding principles that are organized around respective legislative, policy, and regulatory matters. Th is Citywide Legislative Policy intends to supplement the Citywide Strategic Plan while building an effective and flexible legislative advocacy strategy.
II. Guiding Principles
The Citywide Legislative Policy’s Guiding Principles are fundamental, overarching concepts that can be applied to respective legislative and/or regulatory matters. While legislative or regulatory proposals can range in breadth and complexity, these guiding principles will help narrow the City’s focus to those matters that are the most consequential to the City of Chino.
The Citywide Legislative Policy Guiding Principles include:
• Preserve Local Control: Ensuring that proposed legislation supports or expand s the decision-making authority of the local agency to provide public services to its community.
Preserving local control recognizes that Chino residents, through their democratic expression, have put in place elected officials best suited to make decisions that impact the immediate community. This also recognizes that imposing State mandates without appropriate reimbursement (commonly referred to as unfunded mandates) unnecessarily encumbers City resources which places an unreasonable burden on local agenci es to best serve their community.
• Protect and Expand Local Funding and Public Finance: The City will support measures that add to funding sources (e.g., grants or other funding programs). Likewise, the City will support legislation that protects existing funding sources, revenue bases, and local control over the municipal budgeting process. Conversely, the City will oppose efforts to shift local funds to State or County governments. The City will also support legislation, that through transparent tax structures and revenue allocations, seeks to secure a level of predictability in annual tax yields.
• Enhance Quality of Life: The City will support legislation that advocates for the safety, well-being, and security of its residents, businesses, and visitors. This includes legislation that assists the City and its local partners to help families with childcare needs or by providing robust after school programs; this also includes assisting those struggling with mental health and/or those experiencing homelessness. Finally, the City will support legislation that promotes public safety operations.
3.2.a
Citywide Legislative Policy
Packet Pg. 31
Administrative Policy
Citywide Legislative Policy
III. Legislative, Regulatory, and Policy Areas:
The following are specific legislative and policy areas concerning the City of Chino. By identifying these issues, it is this policy’s intent to narrow the City’s focus on specific matters within the scope of the City’s Guiding Principles. These matters are not in ranked order. Rather, this list simply identifies matters of that are consequential to the City of Chino.
A. ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (OIA ): As a neighbor to the OIA, the City of Chino certainly has a clear interest in fostering a collaborative relationship with the Federal Aviation Administration, the City of Ontario, and the Ontario International Airport Authority. Therefore, the City will:
i. Support efforts that consider the quality of life for communities adjacent to OIA.
This includes promoting environmentally safe aviation techniques that not only lessen OIA’s carbon footprint but also lessen the noise pollution generated from OIA activity.
ii. Support efforts to utilize other airports within the Greater Los Angeles area that can accommodate increased activity.
iii. Support legislative and regulatory initiatives to study and mitigate the noise and air quality impacts that are associated with air traffic overflights. iv. Support legislation that seeks to promote local control with airport administration and oppose efforts to regionalize aviation oversight as to minimize adjacent community concerns and influences.
B. FEDERAL LEGISLATION: The City of Chino partners with federal agencies and utilizes federal programs to deliver public services or improve undeveloped land. Therefore, the City will:
i. Support legislation that promotes flexibility to utilize funds that best meet local needs.
ii. Will work with federal agencies to develop sustainable land use and infrastructure plans in the southern part of Chino adjacent to the Pardo Basin and Santa Ana River.
iii. Will engage our local representatives to leverage federal funding for backbone infrastructure projects and social services.
C. HOUSING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS : By representing Chino residents, it is understood that Chino elected officials are best suited to make policy decisions surrounding local land uses. T hus, the City of Chino will support legislation that strengthens local control over land use decisions. Therefore, the City will:
i. Oppose any development agreement located in the City’s sphere of influence that does not align with City standards or General Plan.
ii. Support legislation that simplifies and streamlines Housing Element requirements.
3.2.a
Citywide Legislative Policy
Packet Pg. 32
Administrative Policy
Citywide Legislative Policy
iii. Support measures that provide funding to help cities address affordable housing concerns.
iv. Support efforts that increase City input when Regional Housing Needs Assessments are analyzed and developed.
v. Support any measure or legislation that seeks to preserve or build the City’s local control over planning and zoning matters.
D. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY AND STABILITY: Chino is a dynamic and growing community that requires and expects robust public services. This means the City will adamantly protect its revenue sources while simultaneously taking prudent measures to control operational costs. Therefore, the City will:
i. Support legislation or proposals that provide greater financial independence from the State by affording the City greater latitude to generate and control its own source revenue.
ii. Oppose any legislation that would constitute as an unfunded mandate. iii. Oppose any legislation that would unfairly redistribute general purpose tax revenue (e.g., sales tax revenue yields from online purchases). iv. Oppose legislation that would limit discretion with locally imposed taxes. v. Oppose any legislation that would remove or limit tax exemptions from municipal bonds.
vi. Support any legislation that helps build predictability in local government tax revenues, and likewise, oppose any legislation that reduces or eliminates local revenue sources.
E. EMPLOYEE RELATION S AND PENSION ADMINISTRATION : The City of Chino continues to employ best practices in the field of personnel management, and desires to see that State legislation will support our efforts. Therefore, the City will:
i. Support legislation that allows the City to more independently engage in employee relations and collective bargaining.
ii. Support legislation that fairly distributes financial obligations to fund pensions and other post-employment benefits between the City of Chino and its retirees. iii. Oppose legislation that undermines the relationship and understandings among the City of Chino, City of Chino employees, and the California Public Employee Retirement System (e.g., California Senate Bill 266, 2019-2020 Regular Session). iv. Oppose legislation that seeks to impose additional financial burdens on public agencies with its pension administration, employee relations, and/or collective bargaining practices.
3.2.a
Citywide Legislative Policy
Packet Pg. 33
Administrative Policy
Citywide Legislative Policy
F. PUBLIC SAFETY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: The City of Chino prides itself with providing excellent and robust pu blic safety, health, and recreation services . The City of Chino Police Department , Community Services Department, and Chino Valley Independent Fire District are staples in our community, and the City will support legislation that promotes their respective efforts. Therefore, the City will:
i. Support legislation that provides funding so that local agencies and their community partners are better equipped to support those experiencing mental health crises, homelessness, food insecurity, addiction, etc. ii. Support funding programs that help local agencies continue to improve, modernize, and make more accessible their local parks.
iii. Support legislation that yields greater latitude for local agencies to use asset forfeiture funds in a manner most effective for their respective communities. iv. Support legislation that assists and provides funding for local law enforcement efforts, fire suppression/prevention, hazardous materials mitigation, and disaster preparedness.
v. Support legislation that allows the City to better recoup the funds utilized when responding to a Citywide disaster/emergency.
vi. Support legislation that funds programs aimed at protecting youth from tobacco, alcohol, and drug use. This includes after school programs that offer positive activities for participants.
vii. Support legislation that strengthens law enforcement’s ability to enforce legal protections for all individuals that are victims of a crime. viii. Support legislation that helps law enforcement assuage the criminal and fiscal impacts of “early release” programs.
ix. Support legislation that funds and promotes interagency coordination.
G. LOCAL AND REGIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE: The City of Chino is a growing community that serves as a major residential and commercial area in both the Inland Empire and the Greater Los Angeles region. Given the consistent use and economic implications of Chino’s local and regional infrastructure, the City will continuously seek for opportunities that support infrastructure maintenance and construction. Therefore, the City will:
i. Support legislation that creates the framework for effective and beneficial collaboration with regional and neighboring agencies.
ii. Support legislation that provides funding and/or recognizes the importance of regional and local infrastructure within the San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Riverside, and Orange County areas.
iii. Support legislation that recognizes changing market trends and incorporates opportunities to facilitate these changing economic conditions.
3.2.a
Citywide Legislative Policy
Packet Pg. 34
Administrative Policy
Citywide Legislative Policy
iv. Support legislation that promotes equitable fiscal liability and maintenance for regional infrastructure facilities.
H. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES: The City of Chino’s Administration Department serves as an intersection for all departments. The Administration Department facilitates the efforts of all departments while ensuring compliance with electoral and transparency laws. Therefore, the City will:
i. Support legislation that promotes modern, effective, and financially prudent means to meet legal noticing requirements for public meetings. ii. Support legislation that simplifies FPPC regulations and filing requirements. iii. Support legislation that cuts any unnecessary costs for municipal elections. iv. Oppose any legislation that would require additional costs without adequate reimbursement.
v. Support legislation that would assist cities in identifying, mitigating, and coming to a resolution on clear and unequivocal abuses of the California Public Records Act.
IV. Policy Changes and Amendments:
This policy may be changed with City Council approval by way of an adopted City Council Resolution.
V. Signature Authority:
Consistent with this Citywide Legislative Policy , letters or any other formal expressions of support or opposition to proposed legislation, regulations, or poli cies may be signed by the Mayor on behalf of the City of Chino. Given the legislative process’ fluidity and in the interest of time, s hould the Mayor be unable or present to sign on behalf of the City, then the City Council hereby designates the City Manager to sign on behalf of the City.
3.2.a
Citywide Legislative Policy
Packet Pg. 35
Administrative Policy
Citywide Legislative Policy
VI. Public Review of Official City Positions:
Letters or other formal means of expression will be uploaded on the City’s website as a subpage to the Chino City Council webpage. Additionally, all letters or other formal means of expression will be provided to the City Council and public as an “Information” item in the next regularly scheduled agenda packet . Later in the legislative session (generally in September), City staff wi ll present a “Legislative Scorecard” in the City Council Agenda Packet as an “Information” item that will summarize the City’s position on legislative or regulatory matters, its status, and how Chino’s elected representatives of the California State Assembly and State Senate have voted on those issues (if applicable). Given the number of bills introduced in the California State Assembly and/or California State Senate, the number of bills where the City will take a formal position should be limited to those matters of greatest consequence or concern to the City of Chino.
3.2.a
Citywide Legislative Policy
Packet Pg. 36
Revenue: Expenditure:
Transfer In: Transfer Out:
M E M O R A N D U M
CITY OF CHINO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2022
TO: LINDA REICH, CITY MANAGER
FROM: AMER JAKHER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: STREET SWEEPING PARKING RESTRICTIONS AND ENFORCEMENT UPDATE.
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file a report on staff's intentions to implement the Street Sweeping Parking Restrictions Enforcement Program, and provide direction to staff.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact from this update or from approving these recommendations.
CITY OF CHINO MISSION / VISION / VALUES / STRATEGIC ISSUES:
The recommendation detailed above furthers the City’s values and strategic issues that serve as key pillars on which identified priorities, goals, and action plans are built, by fostering:
• Positive City Image
• Responsible Long-Range Planning
• Public Service Excellence through Internal and External Partnerships
3.3 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 37
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2022
SUBJECT: STREET SWEEPING PARKING RESTRICTIONS AND ENFORCEMENT UPDATE PAGE 2
BACKGROUND
As part of the Fiscal Year 2022 -23 budget, City Council authorized staff with installing Citywide street sweeping no -parking signs during service hours and to proceed with an enforcement program. The entire program includes sign procurement and installation, acquiring two vehicles, and two police perso nnel to administer the enforcement aspect. Enforcement would be accomplished by following the sweepers on daily routes and citing vehicles that are parking during the applicable no-parking time and day.
Staff is currently in process of ordering signs. Like wise, to order the necessary vehicles, staff is waiting for the factory order pricing to be released along with an order window to open. In addition to signs, equipment, and staffing, the current City Municipal Code (detailed below) will need to be updated to enable this program as well.
The current Chino Municipal Code reads as follows:
· 10.28.065 - No parking on specified streets during specified days and hours.
A. No person shall park or leave standing any vehicle on any street or portion of such street specified in subsection B of this section during the days and hours specified by resolution for each street, area, or neighborhood. Any violation of this section is an infraction.
B. This section shall be effective on the following streets:
1. All s treets within The Preserve, which is bounded by Euclid Avenue on the west, Merrill Avenue on the north, Hellman Avenue on the east, and State Route 71 on the south.
2. All streets within College Park, which is bounded by Central Avenue on the west, Ediso n Avenue on the north, Euclid Avenue on the east, and the California Institution for Men on the south.
C. Notice of this chapter shall be posted in accordance with Section 22507.6 of the California Vehicle Code.
(Ord. 2005-09 § 1, 2005.)
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
Staff intends to bring a proposed ordinance amending the current municipal code to the City Council in October 2022. This proposed ordinance will enable no -parking enforcement Citywide on scheduled street sweeping days and times. Once the amended ordinanc e takes effect (30 days after second reading), staff can begin installing the signs. It is staff’s intention to start the sign installation at the north end of the city and follow the current street sweeping map all the way to south Chino to completion. It is anticipated that enforcement will commence in the first quarter of 2023.
3.3 NEW BUSINESS
Packet Pg. 38