Chowchilla City Council
February 24, 2026

AGENDA
City Council Meeting Council Chamber, Chowchilla City Hall 130 S. 2nd Street, Chowchilla, CA 93610
Tuesday, February 24, 2026
Closed Session: 3:00 p.m. | Open Session: 4:00 p.m.

Agendas for all City Council meetings are posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting in the kiosk just outside of City Hall, 130 S. Second St., Chowchilla, CA 93610.

The City of Chowchilla complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA of 1990). The Council Chambers is accessible to the physically disabled. If you need special assistance, please call (559) 665- 8615, ext. 102, at least four days prior to a regular meeting and one day for a special meeting.

California Levine Act Statement:

California Government Code Section 84308, commonly referred to as the "Levine Act," prohibits any Chowchilla City Council Member from participating in any action related to a license, permit, contract, or entitlement for use application if he or she receives any political contributions totaling more than $500 within the previous twelve months, and for twelve months following the date of a final decision, from the business/board or applicant.

The Levine Act also requires a member of the Chowchilla City Council who has received such a contribution to disclose the contribution on the record of the proceeding.

CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Mayor: Kelly Smith
Mayor Pro Tem: Ray Barragan
Council Members: Waseem Ahmed, John Chavez, Jeff Troost City staff and contract employees present will be recorded in the minutes.

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AGENDA Additions and/or Deletions:

PUBLIC ADDRESS – CLOSED SESSION
This time is reserved for members of the audience to address the City Council on items listed on the Closed Session agenda only. It is recommended that speakers limit their comments to no more than 3 minutes each.

CLOSED SESSION – 3:00 PM

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – INITIATION OF LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(4) (Deciding Whether to Initiate Litigation) Number of Cases: 2
OPEN SESSION – 4:00 PM
CLOSED SESSION REPORT:

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION:

OPEN SESSION – 4:00 PM
City Council Meeting AGENDA February 24, 2026

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION:

PRESENTATIONS/WORKSHOP - Section 1

1.1 Ceremonial Oaths of Office:
• Officer Ronald Reyes
• Officer Matthew Hernandez
• Officer Jemal Pulliam
• Officer Carson Leoni
• Officer Dante Lawson
• Officer Hassan Ahmed

PUBLIC ADDRESS
This time is reserved for members of the audience to address the City Council on items of interest that are not on the agenda and that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council.

It is recommended that speakers limit their comments to no more than 3 minutes each, and it is requested that no comments be made during this period on items on the Agenda. Speakers are not allowed to cede their public comment time.

Members of the public who are joining the meeting via Zoom and would like to address the Council on items on the agenda should follow the policy on page 3 of this agenda packet.

The Council is prohibited by law from taking any action on matters discussed that are not on the agenda.

No adverse conclusions should be drawn if the Council does not respond to public comment at this time.

COUNCIL AND STAFF VERBAL REPORTS – Section 2

2.1 COUNCIL VERBAL REPORTS
Legislative, Collaborative Agency, Ad Hoc

2.2 STAFF VERBAL REPORTS
CONSENT CALENDAR – Section 3
All items listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion.

For discussion of any Consent Item, it will be made a part of the Regular Agenda at the request of any member of the City Council or any person in the audience.

3.1 Approval of the February 10, 2026 City Council Meeting Minutes (McClendon)

3.2 Consideration and Acceptance of the January 2026 Monthly Financial Report (Seeto)

3.3 Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 15.61 to Title 15 – Buildings and Construction, of the Chowchilla Municipal Code to Establish an Expedited and Streamlined Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permitting Process (Munoz)

3.4 Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Section 2.08 – Administrative Officer, of the Chowchilla Municipal Code to Delegate Certain Signature Authorities Pursuant to Government Code Section 40602 (Munoz)

3.5 Consideration and Adoption of a City Council Resolution Declaring the Existence of a Public Nuisance by Virtue of Certain Weed Growth (Gaumnitz) City Council Meeting AGENDA February 24, 2026

3.6 Consideration and Adoption of a City Council Resolution Approving a Retainer Agreement with Frazer Law, PLC, Ventura Law, and Napoli Shkolnik to Represent the City in Potential Litigation Regarding Contamination of City Water Supplies by Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (“PFAS”), 1,4 Dioxane, or Other Hazardous Water Contaminants (Prentice)
PUBLIC HEARINGS – Section 4

4.1 Consideration of a Public Hearing to Discuss Submittal of a 2025 Community Development Block Grant Application (Roman)
DEFERRED BUSINESS – Section 5
NEW BUSINESS – Section 6

6.1 Consideration to of the Madera County Economic Development Commission’s 2026- 2027 Fiscal Year Basic Service Level Budget Proposal (Pruett) ANNOUNCEMENTS – Section 7
FEB 26 EDWARD RAY DAY
MAR 6 STAMPEDE CATTLE DRIVE
MAR 7 GIRLS SOFTBALL OPENING CEREMONIES
MAR 10 CITY COUNCIL MEETING, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 4PM

ADJOURNMENT
I, Joann McClendon, CMC, City Clerk, do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda was posted at Chowchilla City Hall, 130 S 2nd Street, Chowchilla, CA, and made available for public review on this 19th day of February, 2026 at or before 5:00 pm.

Joann McClendon, CMC, City Clerk
February 24, 2026 City Council Meeting | 3:00pm Closed Session | 4:00pm Open Session

ZOOM LOGIN INSTRUCTIONS
Use the following URL to start Zoom:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/89439840882?pwd=4hx7n5KhnGTZWJtEJauycdPrSqQZUS. 1 Passcode: 174 534
To participate by phone:

Dial 1-669-444-9171
Webinar ID: 894 3984 0882
Passcode: 174 534
Staff highly recommends that participants log into Zoom 15 minutes before the meeting begins to perform an audio check and ensure they have an optimal internet connection.

Options to participate / view / listen to the meeting:
• If you wish to speak on an item using the Zoom platform on your computer/laptop or smartphone, please use the “raise hand” icon, and you will be unmuted when it is your turn to speak. Please provide your name when unmuted. You can address the Council for up to 3 minutes. • If you are calling into the meeting only (no camera/video) and wish to comment, press *9 to “raise your hand” and *6 to unmute yourself.

Item 3.1

CLICK HERE

TO RETURN TO

THE AGENDA

MINUTES
City Council Meeting Council Chamber, Chowchilla City Hall 130 S. 2nd Street, Chowchilla, CA 93610
Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Open Session: 4:00 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Mayor: Kelly Smith
Mayor Pro Tem: Ray Barragan
Council Members: Waseem Ahmed, John Chavez, Jeff Troost City staff and contract employees present: City Administrator Rod Pruett (Via Zoom), City Attorney Michael Prentice, Police Chief Jeff Palmer, Fire Chief Fred Gaumnitz, Public Works Deputy Director Joe Roman, Community & Economic Development Director Denise Munoz, Finance Director Daniel Seeto, IT System Administrator Kurt Wlodarczyk & Carlos Berrocal, City Clerk Joann McClendon, Deputy City Clerk Vanessa Galvez-Escobar CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AGENDA Additions and/or Deletions: None.

OPEN SESSION – 4:02 PM

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION: Pastor Pruitt
PRESENTATIONS/WORKSHOP - Section 1

PUBLIC ADDRESS
None.

COUNCIL AND STAFF VERBAL REPORTS – Section 2

2.1 COUNCIL VERBAL REPORTS
Legislative, Collaborative Agency, Ad Hoc
Mayor Smith reported, on Wednesday the 28th, he attended a Gubernatorial Forum at Harris Ranch where he met Alan Autry, former Mayor of Fresno, as well as Steve Hilton and the Lieutenant Governor candidate. They shared their perspectives on what is happening in the state.

On Friday the 29th, h attended the ribbon cutting for Mark IV Metal Products with Rod and Denise.

Also, on the 29th, he attended an information meeting with the Madera County Economic Development Council along with Christina Gallagher and City Administrator Pruett. On February 3rd, he met with the Fair Board and the new CEO of the Fair, Natalie Worstein, along with staff to discuss upcoming changes for this year’s Fair. On February 6th, he attended the ribbon cutting at Joey’s Glass & Tint. Mayor Pro Tem Ray Barragan was also in attendance noting that it is great to see new businesses coming into town. On Monday, February 9th, he attended the City Selection Committee Board meeting at the Madera County Building. Council Member Jeff Troost will continue serving on the San Joaquin Valley Air District Board through 2029.

City Council Meeting MINUTES February 10, 2026

2.2 STAFF VERBAL REPORTS
Police Chief Palmer stated that since the last report, the Police Department responded to 1,320 calls for service and conducted 590 proactive stops, resulting in 16 misdemeanor arrests, 8 felony arrests, and 37 citations issued. Code Enforcement responded to 47 calls and addressed 23 violations. Six patrol vehicles have been fully outfitted and placed into service. There was a recent student walkout. One issue occurred during the event and has been discussed on social media.

The juvenile and parents have been contacted. The Police Department will proceed appropriately, taking into consideration the wishes of the juvenile and parents, as those decisions are not solely made by the department.

Fire Chief Gaumnitz reported, for January, the department responded to 115 calls for service with volunteers accounting for 445 individual responses. Weed abatement season is approaching due to the mild winter, and preparations are underway. An item regarding weed abatement will be brought back to Council at a future meeting.

Deputy Director of Public Works Roman reported that staff is proactively addressing weed abatement in parks, streets, rights-of-way, water facilities, and the wastewater treatment plant.

He met with Bussey Storage property owners regarding utilities located within an easement on their property. Discussions are ongoing regarding raising a panel lid to accommodate their project improvements. He attended a meeting led by Community Development with property owners regarding potential future utility needs along Avenue 24 due to anticipated growth. Road 14, between Avenue 24½ and Avenue 25, has been fully patched following complaints. Work is continuing between Avenue 25 and Avenue 25½. Due to the road’s low elevation and tendency to flood during rain, continued maintenance will likely be necessary.

Finance Director Seeto reported that the audit is progressing well. The majority of testing has been completed, and there are currently no findings. W-2s and 1099 forms have been issued.

State Controller reporting was completed by the deadline. Flyers regarding curbside pickup were included with the utility bills.

City Clerk McClendon reported, that for those required to file Form 700, the deadline is April 1.

Paper filings are no longer being accepted; all filings must be submitted electronically through the Filer Portal, Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) website.

City Administrator Pruett reported that meetings have been held with consultants and contractors regarding the new communications tower. Construction has begun but is not yet complete.

Additional work includes installing a cabinet for equipment and pouring a concrete slab before the tower becomes fully operational. Completion is anticipated by the end of the month. Met with Nathan Alonso, PG&E Government Affairs Representative, to discuss utility rates. Residential rates are expected to stabilize or potentially decrease slightly. Met with Rancho Clara regarding proposed improvements at the Robertson Boulevard and Big Tree intersection. They will proceed with a formal traffic study to analyze proposed striping improvements for the first four blocks of their development. Depending on the study results, a request to amend the Development Agreement may be brought forward. Met with Fairgrounds representatives, along with Chief Palmer and staff, regarding traffic control plans for the upcoming Fair. A follow-up meeting is being scheduled to address remaining questions and concerns in advance of the Fair.

CONSENT CALENDAR – Section 3

3.1 Approval of the January 27, 2026 Joint City Council/Redevelopment Successor Agency Meeting Minutes (McClendon)

3.2 Consideration and Acceptance of the January 2026 Check Register Report (Seeto) Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Barragan, Seconded by Council Member Ahmed to Approve the Consent Calendar as Presented. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote.

City Council Meeting MINUTES February 10, 2026
PUBLIC HEARINGS – Section 4

4.1 Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 15.61 to Title 15 – Buildings and Construction, of the Chowchilla Municipal Code to Establish an Expedited and Streamlined Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permitting Process (Munoz)
The Mayor opened the public hearing at 4:17 p.m. There was no public comment. The public hearing was closed at 4:17 p.m.

Motion by Council Member Troost, Seconded by Council Member Chavez to Approve the Introduction and Waive the First Reading of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 15.61 to Title 15 – Buildings and Construction, of the Chowchilla Municipal Code to Establish an Expedited and Streamlined Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permitting Process. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote.

4.2 Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Section 2.08 – Administrative Officer, of the Chowchilla Municipal Code to Delegate Certain Signature Authorities Pursuant to Government Code Section 40602 (Munoz) The Mayor opened the public hearing at 4:20 p.m. There was no public comment. The public hearing was closed at 4:20 p.m.

Motion by Council Member Chavez, Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Barragan to Approve the Introduction and Waive the First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Section 2.08 – Administrative Officer, of the Chowchilla Municipal Code to Delegate Certain Signature Authorities Pursuant to Government Code Section 40602. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote.

DEFERRED BUSINESS – Section 5
NEW BUSINESS – Section 6

6.1 Direction and Approval to Proceed with Fairmead Wastewater System Consolidation HSR24-34 Project and Submitting the Required Application with Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) (Roman)
Motion by Council Member Troost, Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Barragan to approve proceeding with the Fairmead Wastewater System Consolidation HSR24-34 Project and authorize submission of the required application to LAFCO.

ANNOUNCEMENTS – Section 7
FEB 16 PRESIDENTS DAY, CITY OFFICES CLOSED
FEB 18 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 5 P.M.

FEB 21 CAF DINNER, CHOWCHILLA FAIRGROUNDS, 6 P.M.

FEB 24 CITY COUNCIL MEETING, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 4 P.M.

FEB 28 DALE THOMAS MEMORIAL, EASTMAN HALL, 11 A.M.

City Council Meeting MINUTES February 10, 2026

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Smith adjourned the meeting at 4:35 p.m. in memory of Val Anthony Tarabini.

ATTEST: APPROVED:

Joann McClendon, CMC, City Clerk Mayor Kelly Smith

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Item 3.2

CLICK HERE

TO RETURN TO

THE AGENDA
Meeting of: February 24, 2026
AGENDA SECTION: Consent
SUBJECT: Consideration of Monthly Financial Statements
PREPARED BY: Daniel Seeto, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS: January 2026 Budget vs Actual and Balance Sheet

REVIEWED BY
ADMINISTRATOR ☒ REVIEWED BYATTORNEY ☒ REVIEWED BY FINANCE ☒ RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the January 2026 Financial Statements shown in the attachment.

BACKGROUND:

Staff provides Council with monthly financial information as an ongoing financial status update.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

The monthly financial statements consist of a Budget vs Actual and a Balance Sheet for the General Fund.

The Budget vs Actual shows the current Month (Period Activity) and current Year (Fiscal Activity) Revenues and Expenses by Department in summary form compared to the current year Original and Current budgets. The Balance Sheet shows the Assets, Liabilities and Fund Balance at the time the report is generated. This provides an overview of cash, amounts owed to the City, amounts the City owes and the fund balance at a specific point in time.

The financial statements are being presented as an overview of the City’s finances and are not meant to be a comprehensive in-depth review. As a reference to compare to the percent remaining column in the report, the percentage of the year remaining 41.67%.

If the percent remaining column for Revenues is higher than the above-mentioned percentage, that is an unfavorable variance and should be explained if significant. If the percent remaining column for Expenses is lower than the above-mentioned percentage, that is an unfavorable variance and should be explained if significant.

If there are questions regarding the actual amounts or budget vs actual variances, please forward your questions to Finance with enough time before the meeting for staff to research them.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Revenues
General Administration- The City’s largest budgeted revenue sources are Property tax and VLF (50%), Sales Tax (25%), and overhead allocations (20%). Property tax and VLF are only received twice a year, typically in February and May. The first payment of $4,005,356 was received in January 2026 but is not yet reflected in the financials (we are waiting for additional details before finalizing the coding for the payment). The City is teetered - which means we do not have to worry about delinquencies, because the County pays the City and then goes after the delinquencies themselves. Sales tax payments can lag a month or two behind. For the financial statements presented the sales tax payments reflect through November. The overhead allocations are amortized quarterly based on budget, then reconciled to actual at June 30.

Police Department- Budgeted revenue is from school reimbursements for SRO service, which we have received. Also, the budget has a $750k Transfer-in from Measure N for the RIMS Software, recruitment and retention of employees, communications upgrade, evidence storage and fleet/upfitting costs.

Fire Department- This revenue is for fines/penalties and fire inspection fees that are completed throughout the year.

Community & Economic Development- This will fluctuate as building permits are pulled. The City budgeted for the following projects like Rancho Calera, Solar Permits and various other projects within the City. The City still has other miscellaneous permits for other items that are happening as well.

Parks and Facilities- The revenues are for overhead allocations from the LLMD that happen at the end of the year.

Community Relations- Revenues are from sports program reimbursements, park pavilion rentals and donations.

Expenses
General Services- Actual expenses appear to be in-line with budgeted projections as a whole.

Police Department- Actual expenses appear to be in-line with budgeted projections as a whole.

Fire Department- Actual expenses appear to be in-line with budgeted projections as a whole.

Community Relations- Actual expenses appear to be in-line with budgeted projections as a whole.

ALTERNATIVES:

Pull the item for further discussion.
2/9/2026 1:50:19 PM Page 1 of 3
Budget Report
Chowchilla, CA Group Summary
For Fiscal: 2025-2026 Period Ending: 01/31/2026
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
Activity Account Typ…
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Remaining
Dept: 1600 - General Administration
Revenue 10,697,699.00 10,697,699.00 224,712.77 1,545,742.07 -9,151,956.93 85.55% Expense 427,896.00 427,896.00 309.00 47,575.71 380,320.29 88.88% Dept: 1600 - General Administration Surplus (Deficit): 10,269,803.00 10,269,803.00 224,403.77 1,498,166.36 -8,771,636.64 85.41% Dept: 1605 - City Council
Revenue 3,500.00 3,500.00 568.80 4,501.60 1,001.60 28.62% Expense 121,911.00 121,911.00 17,458.89 53,155.47 68,755.53 56.40% Dept: 1605 - City Council Surplus (Deficit): -118,411.00 -118,411.00 -16,890.09 -48,653.87 69,757.13 58.91% Dept: 1610 - City Clerk
Expense 291,900.00 291,900.00 29,345.66 207,602.45 84,297.55 28.88% Dept: 1610 - City Clerk Total: 291,900.00 291,900.00 29,345.66 207,602.45 84,297.55 28.88% Dept: 1615 - City Attorney
Expense 275,000.00 275,000.00 21,626.72 64,468.19 210,531.81 76.56% Dept: 1615 - City Attorney Total: 275,000.00 275,000.00 21,626.72 64,468.19 210,531.81 76.56% Dept: 1705 - General Services
Revenue 0.00 0.00 22.40 4,958.37 4,958.37 0.00%
Expense 2,247,814.00 2,343,984.00 324,430.74 1,523,580.07 820,403.93 35.00% Dept: 1705 - General Services Surplus (Deficit): -2,247,814.00 -2,343,984.00 -324,408.34 -1,518,621.70 825,362.30 35.21% Dept: 1710 - City Administration
Expense 456,703.00 456,703.00 42,312.53 229,926.86 226,776.14 49.66% Dept: 1710 - City Administration Total: 456,703.00 456,703.00 42,312.53 229,926.86 226,776.14 49.66% Dept: 1712 - City Property - Rents
Revenue 162,846.00 162,846.00 8,326.54 95,898.44 -66,947.56 41.11% Expense 53,445.00 53,445.00 3,674.03 26,161.05 27,283.95 51.05% Dept: 1712 - City Property - Rents Surplus (Deficit): 109,401.00 109,401.00 4,652.51 69,737.39 -39,663.61 36.26% Dept: 1720 - Finance Department
Revenue 8,200.00 8,200.00 280.00 3,138.00 -5,062.00 61.73% Expense 977,847.00 977,847.00 87,061.53 550,418.83 427,428.17 43.71% Dept: 1720 - Finance Department Surplus (Deficit): -969,647.00 -969,647.00 -86,781.53 -547,280.83 422,366.17 43.56% Dept: 2610 - Police Department
Revenue 1,049,432.00 1,208,326.00 15,689.06 292,607.98 -915,718.02 75.78% Expense 5,224,437.00 5,692,119.00 578,911.72 3,472,380.76 2,219,738.24 39.00% Dept: 2610 - Police Department Surplus (Deficit): -4,175,005.00 -4,483,793.00 -563,222.66 -3,179,772.78 1,304,020.22 29.08% Dept: 2615 - Police - Mad Net
Revenue 193,300.00 193,300.00 0.00 0.00 -193,300.00 100.00% Expense 303,692.00 303,692.00 14,595.58 17,768.09 285,923.91 94.15% Dept: 2615 - Police - Mad Net Surplus (Deficit): -110,392.00 -110,392.00 -14,595.58 -17,768.09 92,623.91 83.90% Dept: 2705 - Fire Department
Revenue 5,500.00 14,224.00 250.00 10,868.13 -3,355.87 23.59% Expense 517,716.00 528,798.00 31,358.49 274,489.05 254,308.95 48.09% Dept: 2705 - Fire Department Surplus (Deficit): -512,216.00 -514,574.00 -31,108.49 -263,620.92 250,953.08 48.77% Dept: 4705 - Community & Economic Development
Revenue 739,134.00 739,134.00 66,347.07 493,114.64 -246,019.36 33.28% Expense 1,180,198.00 1,170,198.00 81,088.03 558,022.97 612,175.03 52.31% Dept: 4705 - Community & Economic Development Surplus (Deficit): -441,064.00 -431,064.00 -14,740.96 -64,908.33 366,155.67 84.94% Dept: 6610 - Community Pool (OLD)
Revenue 2,000.00 3,600.00 0.00 3,628.00 28.00 0.78%
Expense 24,956.00 24,956.00 497.55 16,291.14 8,664.86 34.72% Budget Report For Fiscal: 2025-2026 Period Ending: 01/31/2026 2/9/2026 1:50:19 PM Page 2 of 3
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
Activity Account Typ…
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Remaining
Dept: 6610 - Community Pool (OLD) Surplus (Deficit): -22,956.00 -21,356.00 -497.55 -12,663.14 8,692.86 40.70% Dept: 6615 - Senior Services
Expense 47,902.00 50,902.00 15,098.19 21,120.31 29,781.69 58.51% Dept: 6615 - Senior Services Total: 47,902.00 50,902.00 15,098.19 21,120.31 29,781.69 58.51% Dept: 6620 - Parks & Facilities
Revenue 79,597.00 79,597.00 0.00 20,226.50 -59,370.50 74.59% Expense 1,337,779.00 1,423,863.00 64,017.75 525,573.44 898,289.56 63.09% Dept: 6620 - Parks & Facilities Surplus (Deficit): -1,258,182.00 -1,344,266.00 -64,017.75 -505,346.94 838,919.06 62.41% Dept: 6625 - Community Relations
Revenue 24,408.00 24,408.00 1,134.00 16,998.77 -7,409.23 30.36% Expense 276,435.00 296,275.00 25,319.94 189,965.52 106,309.48 35.88% Dept: 6625 - Community Relations Surplus (Deficit): -252,027.00 -271,867.00 -24,185.94 -172,966.75 98,900.25 36.38% Report Surplus (Deficit): -800,015.00 -1,304,655.00 -1,019,775.71 -5,286,817.41 -3,982,162.41 -305.23% Budget Report For Fiscal: 2025-2026 Period Ending: 01/31/2026 2/9/2026 1:50:19 PM Page 3 of 3
Fund Summary
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
Fund (Unfavorable)
Period
Activity
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
100 - General Fund -800,015.00 -1,304,655.00 -1,019,775.71 -5,286,817.41 -3,982,162.41 Report Surplus (Deficit): -800,015.00 -1,304,655.00 -1,019,775.71 -5,286,817.41 -3,982,162.41 2/9/2026 1:53:13 PM Page 1 of 1
Balance Sheet
Chowchilla, CA Account Summary
As Of 01/31/2026
Account Name Balance
Fund: 100 - General Fund
Assets
100-0100-0201 Petty Cash 500.00
100-0100-0202 Pre-Paid Postage Account 1,586.78
100-0100-0206 Cash Drawer 1,700.00
100-0100-0219 Lease Receivable 48,839.58
100-0100-0224 A/R MODULE ONLY RECEIVALBLES 84,167.25
100-0100-0226 Advance to Other Funds 294,135.64
100-0100-0227 Liens Receivables General Fund 162,270.67 100-0100-0228 Pending Charges or Refunds 0.01
100-0100-0229 A/R Business License -28.00
100-0100-0230 Accounts Receivable-Utilities 24.58
100-0100-0244 Deposit for Sec. 125 1,278.90
100-0100-0291 Prepaid Expenses 13,362.75
100-0100-1900 Claim On Cash 7,221,123.15
Total Assets: 7,828,961.31 7,828,961.31
Liability
100-0200-0422 Bonds for Work-Refundable 500.00
100-0200-0480 Deferred Revenue 157,935.77
100-0200-0482 Unavailable Lease Revenue 25,411.68
100-0200-2901 Accounts Payable Pending 69,223.28
Total Liability: 253,070.73
Equity
100-0300-0601 Fund Balance 11,651,134.66
100-0300-0604 Reserve for Contingencies 910,223.00
100-0300-0605 Designated for Prepaid Items 239.50
100-0300-0611 Reserve for L/T A/R 294,135.64
100-0300-0615 SB1186 6,975.19
Total Beginning Equity: 12,862,707.99
Total Revenue 2,491,682.50
Total Expense 7,778,499.91
Revenues Over/Under Expenses -5,286,817.41
Total Liabilities, Equity and Current Surplus (Deficit): 7,828,961.31 Total Equity and Current Surplus (Deficit): 7,575,890.58

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Item 3.3

CLICK HERE

TO RETURN TO

THE AGENDA
Meeting of: February 24, 2026
AGENDA SECTION: Consent
SUBJECT: Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 15.61 To Title 15 of the Municipal Code to Establish an Expedited and Streamlined Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permitting Process
PREPARED BY: Janae Lacey, Community & Economic Development Specialist and Susan Long, Contract City Planner
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance

REVIEWED BY
ADMINISTRATOR ☒ REVIEWED BYATTORNEY ☒ REVIEWED BY FINANCE ☒ RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council conduct a public hearing, waive second reading and adopt an Ordinance adding Chapter 15.61 to Title 15 of the Chowchilla Municipal Code to establish an expedited and streamlined electric vehicle charging station permitting process, including approval of a standardized permit checklist, and directing ministerial processing pursuant to Government Code Sections 65850.7 and 65850.71.

BACKGROUND:

Assembly Bill 1236 (Chiu, 2015), codified in Government Code Section 65850.7, requires all California cities and counties to adopt an expedited and streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS), including a standardized permit checklist. The law is intended to accelerate the deployment of EV charging infrastructure by limiting local reviews to health and safety requirements and reducing permitting delays, thereby supporting State goals related to air quality improvement, greenhouse gas reduction, and economic development.

Assembly Bill 970 (McCarty, 2021), codified in Government Code Section 65850.71, expands upon AB 1236 by establishing mandatory, binding permit review timelines based on project size and clarifying parking requirements for EVCS installations. AB 970 also requires jurisdictions to provide applicants with a single, complete set of comments identifying all application deficiencies, which must be addressed through streamlined revisions. Together, AB 1236 and AB 970 apply to all EV charging station installations, including Level 1, Level 2, and DC fast charging; public and private facilities; light-, medium-, and heavyduty vehicle charging stations; and all associated equipment and infrastructure necessary for charging station operation. All California cities and counties, including charter cities, are required to comply with these provisions. AB 970 has been in effect statewide since January 1, 2023.

The proposed ordinance adds Chapter 15.61 (Expedited and Streamlined Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permitting Process) of the Chowchilla Municipal Code to formally establish an expedited and streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ANALYSIS:

The proposed action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to:
• CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5) – Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.

No further environmental review is required.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

Adoption of the proposed ordinance is necessary to ensure the City’s permitting procedures for electric vehicle charging stations comply with State law. Assembly Bill 1236 and Assembly Bill 970 require all California cities and counties to establish an expedited and streamlined EV charging station permitting process, including specific review timelines and standardized application requirements. Failure to adopt and implement these provisions could expose the City to legal risk and impede timely processing of EV charging infrastructure applications.

The proposed ordinance clarifies permit review procedures, establishes state-mandated timelines, and limits review to health and safety considerations, thereby providing predictability and efficiency for applicants while maintaining the City’s ability to enforce applicable codes and safety standards.

Streamlining the permitting process also supports the deployment of EV charging infrastructure, which advances State and local goals related to air quality improvement, greenhouse gas reduction, and economic development.

Adopting the ordinance will ensure the City remains consistent with State requirements, provides clear guidance to applicants and staff, and facilitates the timely installation of electric vehicle charging stations within the community.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None
ALTERNATIVES:

1. Introduce the ordinance and waive further reading (recommended).

2. Continue the item to a future meeting.

3. Direct staff to return with revisions prior to introduction.

The option of not adopting the ordinance is not recommended, as it would result in noncompliance with AB 1236 and AB 970.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:

If adopted, the ordinance will become effective 30 days after final passage.

CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE # XXX-26

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHOWCHILLA ADDING CHAPTER 15.61 TO TITLE 15 OF THE CHOWCHILLA MUNICIPAL CODE

ESTABLISHING AN EXPEDITED AND STREAMLINED

ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION PERMITTING PROCESS
WHEREAS, the State of California has adopted policies to promote the widespread deployment of zero-emission vehicles and supporting electric vehicle charging infrastructure in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve air quality, and advance public health and economic development goals; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1236 (Chiu, Chapter 598, Statutes of 2015), codified at Government Code Section 65850.7, requires all California cities and counties to adopt an ordinance establishing an expedited and streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations, including adoption of a standardized permit checklist; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 970 (McCarty, Chapter 640, Statutes of 2021), codified at Government Code Section 65850.71, builds upon AB 1236 by imposing mandatory review timelines, limiting permit review to health and safety requirements, and clarifying parking requirements for electric vehicle charging stations; and WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 65850.7 and 65850.71 apply to all California cities, including charter cities, and require compliance for all electric vehicle charging station installations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to ensure the City’s permitting procedures are consistent with State law, provide certainty to applicants, and facilitate the timely installation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure while preserving the City’s authority to enforce applicable health and safety standards; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of this ordinance constitutes an organizational and administrative activity of government that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment and is therefore exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHOWCHILLA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Title 15 of the Chowchilla Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Chapter

15.61, entitled “Electric Vehicle Charging Stations,” to read as follows:

Chapter 15.61 EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED PERMITTING FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE

CHARGING STATIONS

15.61.010 Purpose and Intent.

The purpose of this chapter is to establish an expedited and streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations in compliance with Government Code Sections 65850.7 and 65850.71. This chapter is intended to facilitate the timely installation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure while ensuring that such installations comply with applicable health and safety standards.

15.61.020 Applicability.

A. This chapter applies to all electric vehicle charging station installations within the City, including, but not limited to:

1. Level 1, Level 2, and direct current (DC) fast charging stations;

2. Public and private charging stations;

3. Charging stations serving light-, medium-, and heavy-duty electric vehicles; and

4. All associated equipment and infrastructure necessary for the operation of electric vehicle charging stations.

B. This chapter applies regardless of whether the electric vehicle charging station is installed as a primary or accessory use.

15.61.030 Definitions.

For purposes of this chapter, the definitions set forth in Government Code Sections 65850.7 and 65850.71, and any implementing regulations, shall apply. In the event of a conflict, State law shall control.

15.61.040 Ministerial Review.

A. Applications for electric vehicle charging stations that comply with the requirements of this chapter and the City’s standardized permit checklist shall be reviewed and approved ministerially.

B. Review of an electric vehicle charging station application shall be limited to health and safety requirements, including compliance with applicable building, electrical, fire, accessibility, and safety codes and standards.

15.61.050 Permit Checklist.

A. The City shall maintain and make publicly available a standardized electric vehicle charging station permit checklist consistent with Government Code Section 65850.7.

B. An application shall be deemed complete only when all items identified on the checklist have been submitted.

C. The City shall provide applicants with one complete set of comments identifying all deficiencies in an application, consistent with Government Code Section 65850.71.

15.61.060 Review Timelines.

A. The City shall approve or deny an application for an electric vehicle charging station within the timeframes required by Government Code Section 65850.71, based on the size and scope of the proposed project.

B. Failure to act within the applicable timeframe shall result in the application being deemed approved, as provided by State law.

15.61.070 Parking Requirements.

Electric vehicle charging stations shall not be subject to parking requirements beyond those permitted under Government Code Section 65850.71.

15.61.080 Fees.

Permit fees for electric vehicle charging stations shall be limited to the reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged and shall comply with Government Code Section 66016.

15.61.090 Conflicts with State Law.

This chapter shall be interpreted and applied in a manner consistent with Government Code Sections 65850.7 and 65850.71. In the event of a conflict between this chapter and State law, State law shall prevail.

SECTION 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance.

SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

SECTION 4. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published or posted as required by law.

INTRODUCED at a regular City Council meeting on the 10th day of February 2026.

APPROVED, PASSED, and ADOPTED this ___ day of __________, 2026.

APPROVED:
________________________
Mayor Kelly Smith
ATTEST:
_______________________
Joann McClendon, CMC
City Clerk
I, Joann McClendon, City Clerk of the City of Chowchilla, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance number xxx-26 was duly introduced for the first reading on February 10, 2026 and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chowchilla on _______________ XX, 2026.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS THEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and affix the official seal of the City of Chowchilla on this ___ day of ____________, 2026.

Joann McClendon, CMC
City Clerk

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Item 3.4

CLICK HERE

TO RETURN TO

THE AGENDA
Meeting of: February 24, 2026
AGENDA SECTION: Consent
SUBJECT: Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Section 2.08 of Title 2 of the Chowchilla Municipal Code to Delegate Certain Signature Authorities Pursuant to Government Code 40602
PREPARED BY: Susan Long, Contract City Planner
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance

REVIEWED BY
ADMINISTRATOR ☒ REVIEWED BYATTORNEY ☒ REVIEWED BY FINANCE ☒ RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council conduct a public hearing, waive second reading and adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 2.08 of Title 2 of the Chowchilla Municipal Code to delegate certain signature authorities pursuant to Government Code Section 40602.

BACKGROUND:

Under Government Code §40602, the Mayor is required to sign all warrants, contracts, conveyances, and any instruments requiring the city seal, unless the City Council adopts an ordinance allowing another officer to sign. While this complies with Government Code Section 40602, it can result in administrative delays when documents must be executed between Council meetings or within short deadlines imposed by grant agencies, vendors, or other governmental entities.

The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is now enforcing this requirement more strictly. When a city’s signatory structure does not meet the standard in §40602, it can slow or block the submittal of applications, processing of funding amendments, conditional award standard agreements, budget revisions, and future funding awards.

Government Code Section 40602 expressly allows the City Council to delegate signature authority by ordinance to another officer of the City. Many California general law cities utilize this authority to permit a City Manager or City Administrator to execute certain documents, subject to dollar thresholds, prior Council approval, or emergency conditions.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ANALYSIS:

The proposed action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to:
• CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5) – Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.

No further environmental review is required.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

If the City’s desire is for the City Administrator to sign certain applications, contracts and amendments, HCD has advised that a signatory ordinance adopted pursuant to Government Code Section §40602 is required before HCD will process items funding agreements, contracts, reimbursements, or related compliance documents. Delegation of signature authority through informal means or by resolution, is no longer sufficient for HCD purposes.

Upon adoption, a copy of the ordinance will be required as part of applications and funding materials to demonstrate that the individual authorized to execute and submit documents on behalf of the City is consistent with the City’s Municipal Code and Government Code Section §40602.

The proposed delegation is intended to improve administrative efficiency, reduce delays in time-sensitive transactions--particularly grant compliance and reimbursement documents--and align the City’s practices with those of similarly situated general law cities.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Introduce the ordinance and waive further reading (recommended).

2. Continue the item to a future meeting.

3. Direct staff to return with revisions prior to introduction.

4. Take no action, in which case the Mayor would continue to serve as the sole authorized signatory for all contracts and instruments pursuant to Government Code Section 40602, and the City may experience delays or limitations in processing grant applications and amendments required by funding agencies.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:

If adopted, the ordinance will become effective 30 days after final passage.

CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE # XXX-26

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHOWCHILLA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2.08 OF THE CHOWCHILLA MUNICIPAL

CODE TO DELEGATE CERTAIN SIGNATURE AUTHORITIES PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 40602
WHEREAS, the City of Chowchilla is a general law city subject to the provisions of the California Government Code; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 40602 provides that the Mayor shall sign all warrants, written contracts, conveyances, and instruments requiring the City seal unless the legislative body provides by ordinance that such documents may be signed by another officer; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to delegate a portion of this authority to the City Administrator, while retaining the Mayor’s statutory role as the City’s primary signatory for major contracts and instruments. and
WHEREAS, this ordinance amends Chapter 2.08 of the Chowchilla Municipal Code to clearly establish signature authority consistent with state law.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHOWCHILLA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 2.08 of the Chowchilla Municipal Code is hereby amended to add Section 2.08.090, titled “Signature Authority Delegation”, to read as follows:

2.08.090 — Signature Authority Delegation.

A. Default Signatory — Mayor.

Consistent with Government Code Section 40602, the Mayor shall sign:

1. All warrants drawn on the City treasury;

2. All written contracts and conveyances made or entered into by the City; and

3. All instruments requiring the City seal, except as otherwise provided in this Section.

B. Delegation to the City Administrator.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 40602, the City Administrator is authorized to sign the following instruments on behalf of the City:

1. Contracts, agreements and amendments not previously authorized by City Council obligating City funds up to and including $100,000 per contract.

2. Grant-related documents including applications, compliance forms, certifications, budget documents, correspondence, and reporting forms, following City Council approval of the primary grant award or acceptance of funds.

3. Right-of-entry permits, license agreements, temporary construction easements, and similar non-dispositive real property instruments previously approved by the City Council or determined by the City Administrator to be necessary for City operations.

4. Warrants, checks, and financial instruments issued pursuant to the adopted City budget, approved contracts, or other City Councilauthorized expenditures.

5. Emergency contracts and instruments necessary to protect life, health, safety, property, or essential services, in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22050, subject to City Council ratification.

C. Instruments Reserved for the Mayor.

Notwithstanding subsection B, the following instruments shall be signed by the Mayor unless the City Council specifically directs otherwise:

1. Contracts and agreements exceeding the City Administrator’s signature authority limit;

2. Development agreements, disposition and development agreements, and franchise agreements;

3. Long-term leases or conveyances of real property interests;

4. Any contract or instrument that the City Council expressly directs the Mayor to sign;

5. Any instrument requiring the City seal that, in the City Administrator’s judgment, should be executed by the Mayor due to policy significance or public visibility.

D. Mayor Pro Tem Acting in Mayor’s Absence.

During any period in which the Mayor is unavailable or unable to act, the Mayor Pro Tem shall exercise the signature authority described in this Section.

E. Execution Requirements.

Prior to signing any contract or instrument under this Section, the City Administrator shall ensure that:

1. Funds have been appropriated or authorized by the City Council;

2. The document has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney, unless exempt under City policy; and

3. All applicable procurement and administrative procedures have been satisfied.

F. Reporting.

The City Administrator shall provide the City Council with a quarterly report summarizing all instruments executed under this Section that have a Fiscal impact.

SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY. If any part of this Ordinance is held invalid for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance, and the City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of the Ordinance if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted.

SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its final passage.

SECTION 4. PUBLICATION. The City Clerk is hereby directed to post a summary and certified copy of this Ordinance in the City Clerk’s office at least five (5) days prior to adoption and to publish a summary of the Ordinance in the Madera Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation, within fifteen (15) days after its adoption INTRODUCED at a regular City Council meeting on the 10th day of February 2026.

APPROVED, PASSED, and ADOPTED this ___ day of __________, 2026.

APPROVED:
________________________
Mayor Kelly Smith
ATTEST:
_______________________
Joann McClendon, CMC
City Clerk
I, Joann McClendon, City Clerk of the City of Chowchilla, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance number xxx-26 was duly introduced for the first reading on February 10, 2026 and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chowchilla on _______________ XX, 2026.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS THEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and affix the official seal of the City of Chowchilla on this ___ day of ____________, 2026.

Joann McClendon, CMC
City Clerk

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Item 3.5

CLICK HERE

TO RETURN TO

THE AGENDA
Meeting of: February 24, 2026
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Weed Abatement
PREPARED BY: Fred Gaumnitz, Fire Chief
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution and Time Line

REVIEWED BY
ADMINISTRATOR ☒ REVIEWED BYATTORNEY ☒ REVIEWED BY FINANCE ☒ RECOMMENDATION:

Approval of a Resolution declaring the existence of a public nuisance by virtue of certain weed growth per Consent Calendar minute order by roll call vote.

BACKGROUND:

The need for weed abatement is a seasonal and recurring nuisance, which poses a fire, safety, and public health risk. The accumulation of weed growth also has a negative visual effect to the public within the City limits, which is a priority goal of the City Council. The timeline and activity summary are included in your supplements. This notice of abatement will be public noticed over the next week in the Madera tribune and the City’s social media site(s).

This is an annual program of the City. The Chowchilla Municipal Code, Section 8.12 allows for the authority of this activity.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

This program in the past has been shown to help expedite the removal of weeds, which in turn reduces the fire and safety hazards due to their uncontrolled growth and gives Chowchilla and its neighbors a more appealing landscape. Community Pride is a City Council goal.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Initial costs for abatement of non-compliant properties incurred through planned budget expenditures.

Unpaid abatement costs will be recorded and a lien placed on such properties.

ALTERNATIVES:

Not perform annual weed abatement, notices and abatement of non-compliant properties.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:

Administrative Services office to forward a copy of the executed resolution to the Community & Economic Development Department to process.

Community & Economic Development Department to arrange for publication in local newspaper.

COUNCIL RESOLUTION # XX-26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF CHOWCHILLA, CALIFORNIA

DECLARING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE BY VIRTUE OF CERTAIN WEED GROWTH
WHEREAS, the Chowchilla Municipal Code, Section 8.12, All weeds growing upon the streets or sidewalks or upon or in front of private property within the city which bear seeds of a wingy or downy nature or attain such a large growth as to become a fire menace when dry, or at full natural growth will attain such a large growth as to become a fire menace when dry, or which are otherwise noxious or dangerous, may be declared to be a public nuisance by the city council, and may thereafter be abated as provided in this chapter.

WHEREAS, "Weeds," as used in this chapter, means and includes weeds, grass, ferns, vines and other similar natural growth other than growth ordinarily and customarily planted for decorative purposes and which has been planted for decorative purposes and is under continuing cultivation; and
WHEREAS, Weeds in excess of approximately six inches tall as determined by the Code Enforcement Officer will be determined to be a public nuisance; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to effect timely removal of all weeds so described through the City’s Weed Abatement Program, and in manner provided by law; and WHEREAS, if abatement does not occur during time frame prescribed, the City may choose to follow Chowchilla Municipal Code Section 8.12 lien process and/or seek Administrative fines per Ordinance 444-08.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chowchilla hereby declares that certain weeds, as determined by the Code Enforcement Official, constitute that a public nuisance exists and the Exhibit “A” time line schedule for 2026 is attached.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chowchilla this 24th day of February, 2026 by the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

Mayor Kelly Smith
ATTEST:

Joann McClendon, CMC
City Clerk
Community & Economic Development Department
Weed Abatement Timeline
2026
2/24/2026 Council – Resolution per CMC Chapter 8.12 – Declaring Weeds a Public Nuisance
2/25/2026 Send Council Resolution to Newspaper for Advertising (Post on City social media site)
2/25/2026 Abatement Declaration Advertised for 1 week 2/28 thru 3/6 (Resolution needs to be submitted Wednesday before 10:00 am to be published in the following weeks newspaper) 3/2/2026 Begin creating list of potential properties in violation 3/9/2026 Owners of Record Notified by LETTERS VIA MAIL
3/11/2026 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE MARCH 14th EDITION of MADERA

TRIBUNE
**3/26/2026 Public Protest Hearing to Council – Authorization to Abate Weeds 4/5/2026 Property Owners to abate by April 5th – Cutoff date 4/6/2026 Non-Compliant PROPERTIES cited – Need to send out citations next day 4/14/2026 City Council to approve cost of bid from contractor if city purchase policy mandates.
4/15/2026 Coordinate ABATEMENT WITH CONTRACTOR
4/20/2026 PROPERTY ABATEMENT in progress to be complete by May 1st 5/18/2026 LIST OF ABATED PROPERTIES TO FINANCE FOR BILLING 5/29/2026 LIENS CREATED
**Special Council Meeting
Note: These dates are tentative due to weather and time restraints in processing. The dates may vary as much as 30 days.

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Item 3.6

CLICK HERE

TO RETURN TO

THE AGENDA
Meeting of: February 24, 2026
AGENDA SECTION: Consent
SUBJECT: Consideration and Adoption of a City Council Resolution Approving a Retainer Agreement with Frazer Law, PLC, Ventura Law, and Napoli Shkolnik to Represent the City in Potential Litigation Regarding Contamination of City Water Supplies by Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (“PFAS”), 1,4 Dioxane, or Other Hazardous Water Contaminants.

PREPARED BY: Michael Prentice, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, Retainer Agreement

REVIEWED BY
ADMINISTRATOR ☒ REVIEWED BYATTORNEY ☒ REVIEWED BY FINANCE ☒ RECOMMENDATION:

Approve a retainer agreement with Frazer Law, PLC, Ventura Law, and Napoli Shkolnik to represent the City of Chowchilla (“City”) in potential litigation regarding the presence of polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) and other hazardous water contaminants such as 1,4 Dioxane (collectively, the “Contaminants”) in City Water Supplies.

BACKGROUND:

The Contaminants, often referred to as “forever chemicals,” are a group of more than 9,000 man-made chemical compounds that do not occur naturally in the environment. They are used in a variety of industry applications, including grease- and water-resistant food packaging, fire-fighting foam, carpeting, apparel, and upholstery. These compounds are referred to as “forever chemicals” because they do not biodegrade or breakdown and, once released into the environment, PFAS pollute the air, soil, and waterways, ultimately ending up in the water supply.

While the extent of contamination is not fully known, investigations thus far, such as sampling and monitoring required by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), indicate the problem is widespread.

The EPA is expected to implement stronger standards related to the Contaminants, and the State of California is also implementing stringent standards.

The problem for municipalities and water providers is that they will be responsible for remediation costs and future operational and maintenance costs related to prior application or use of the Contaminants. As a result, many municipalities are pursuing litigation to recover damages from the manufacturers of products known to contain the Contaminants.

Roe Frazer, of Frazer Law, PLC, is Co-Chair of Water Providers Committee and Co-Lead Discovery Counsel in the PFAS multi-district litigation and, as such, has invaluable insight to potential litigation.

Ventura Law represented numerous cities in the Opioid Crisis and the BP oil spill litigation and is also currently involved in several national lawsuits against the pharmaceutical and medical device industry.

Napoli Shkolnik has extensive experience litigating water contamination cases on behalf of public and private entities throughout the country.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

To ensure the City is represented in potential litigation related to the Contaminants and is compensated for any potential contamination.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The retainer agreement is a contingency fee agreement meaning that the City does not pay anything unless the Firms recoup damages for the City. The retainer agreement includes a thirty-three percent (33%) contingency fee and requires the City to reimburse the Firms for costs, should the Firms recoup damages on behalf of the City. The City will not be required to pay the Firms’ costs or any other fee if no damages are recovered.

ALTERNATIVES:

Not to approve the retainer agreement or defer approval to a future City Council meeting.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:

Execute the retainer agreement.

COUNCIL RESOLUTION # XX-26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHOWCHILLA, CALIFORNIA

APPROVING A RETAINER AGREEMENT WITH NAPOLI SHKOLNIK, VENTURA LAW, AND

FRAZER LAW, PLC FOR REPRESENTATION IN POTENTIAL LITIGATION REGARDING

THE PRESENCE OF POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES AND OTHER HAZARDOUS

WATER CONTAMINANTS IN CITY WATER SUPPLIES
WHEREAS, polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”), often referred to as “forever” chemicals, are a group of more than 9,000 man-made chemical compounds that do not occur naturally in the environment; and
WHEREAS, PFAS and other hazardous water contaminants, including but not limited to 1,4 Dioxane (collectively, the “Contaminants”), are used in a variety of industry applications, including grease- and water-resistant food packaging, fire-fighting foam, carpeting, apparel, and upholstery; and
WHEREAS, these Contaminants are referred to as forever chemicals because they do not biodegrade or breakdown and, once released into the environment, the Contaminants pollute the air, soil, and waterways, ultimately ending up in the water supply; and WHEREAS, the extent of contamination is not fully known, but investigations thus far indicate the problem is widespread and, so, the Environmental Protection Agency and the State of California have implemented stringent standards for the application, use, and remediation of such Contaminants; and
WHEREAS, municipalities and other water providers will be responsible for remediation costs and future operational and maintenance cost related to the Contaminants and, as a result, many municipalities are pursuing litigation to recover damages from the manufacturers of products known to contain these Contaminants; and
WHEREAS, Roe Frazer, of Frazer Law, PLC, is Co-Chair of Water Providers Committee and Co-Lead Discovery Counsel in the PFAS multi-district litigation and, as such, has invaluable insight to potential litigation. Ventura Law represented numerous cities in the Opioid Crisis and the BP oil spill litigation and is also currently involved in several national litigations against the pharmaceutical and medical device industry. Napoli Shkolnik has extensive experience litigating water contamination cases on behalf of public and private entities throughout the country; and WHEREAS, the retainer agreement is a contingency fee agreement meaning that the City does not pay anything unless Frazer Law, Ventura Law, and/or Napoli Shkolnik recoup damages for the City.
///
///
///
NOW THEREFORE IT IS RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chowchilla does hereby approve a retainer agreement with Frazer Law, PLC, Ventura Law, and Napoli Shkolnik to represent the City of Chowchilla in potential litigation regarding the presence of Contaminants in City water supplies.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chowchilla this 24th day of February, 2026 by the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

Mayor Kelly Smith
ATTEST:

Joann McClendon, CMC
City Clerk

RETAINER AGREEMENT

THIS CONTRACT IS SUBJECT TO ARBITRATION

UNDER THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT AND

THE STATE OF NEW YORK GENERAL ARBITRATION STATUTE
The City of Chowchilla, California retains the law firms of Napoli Shkolnik, Ventura & Ribeiro, PLLC d/b/a Ventura Law and Frazer, PLC (the “Law Firm”), as our attorneys to prosecute any legal claim for negligence, trespass, public nuisance (or other viable causes of action) against any and all parties individuals and/or corporations that may be liable under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) for damages arising out of the contamination of water supplies by perand polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and other hazardous water contaminants, like 1,4 Dioxane. We specifically agree as follows:

1. FEE PERCENTAGE: Client and Law Firm agree that the Law Firm shall be paid Thirty Three Percent (33%) of the sum recovered, whether by suit, settlement or otherwise. Client will not be liable to pay the Law Firm any legal fee if there is not any form of recovery.

2. DISBURSEMENTS: In the event there is no recovery, the Client shall not be obligated to pay the Law Firm a legal fee for services rendered. Disbursements may include some of the following expenses: court filing fees, sheriff fees, court stenographer fees, deposition costs, expert fees for expert depositions and court appearances, trial exhibits, computer on-line search fees, express mail, postage, photocopy charges, document management charges, long distance telephone charges among other charges.

Document management charges are the fees charged by the law firm for processing documents during litigation, such as documents produced by defendant(s) and/or other parties, etc. Processing of the documents may include but is not limited to the following:
(1) scanning; (2) conversion of native files to PDF documents; (3) OCR (optical code recognition); and/or (4) indexing. At the time of settlement and distribution of proceeds, these expenses shall be deducted from the Client’s share after computation of the Attorney’s Fee.

3. COMPUTATION OF FEES. The contingency fee shall be computed on the gross recovery, resulting in a net settlement (or judgment), from which all appropriate disbursements in connection with the institution and prosecution of this claim is deducted, as set forth in paragraph 2 above. Examples of how a contingency fee is computed are as follows:

Gross settlement $100.00

33.3% Attorney’s Fee $ 33.00
Net settlement $ 67.00
Disbursements -$ 2.00
Net to Client $ 65.00

4. CONTINGENCY FEE PAYMENT SCHEDULE: As set forth above, the Client agrees to pay the Attorney a contingency fee for legal services rendered upon settlement or conclusion of the matter. If the payments to the Client are not a single lump payment but to be paid over a period of time i.e. “installment payments”, such Attorney Contingency Fees will be paid in full of the first installment, or installments paid by Defendant(s). If the initial payment is insufficient to fund the full amount of Attorney’s Fees due then in subsequent payments by the Defendant(s), any additional amounts recovered or received annually, the Attorney shall have the right to collect the agreedupon contingency fee from those subsequent amounts recovered or received from the Defendant or any QSF administrator first. Irrespective of the method of payment i.e., lump sum or installment, the amount of Attorney Fees shall not exceed the contingency amount as set forth herein. To the extent this Amendment differs from the original retainer this Amendment shall control.

5. WITHDRAWAL: The Law Firm expressly reserves the right to withdraw its representation at any time upon reasonable notification to the client. In the event that the client advises the Law Firm to discontinue the handling of this claim, or if the client fails to cooperate with the Law Firm in the handling of this claim, client agrees to compensate the Law Firm a reasonable amount for its services, and for the time spent on this claim on an hourly basis or under such other arrangement that may be agreed upon by the parties. The client understands that the Law Firm have conditionally accepted this case based upon independent confirmation of all facts and injuries claimed to have been sustained by Client. In the event that the client desires to transfer the file from this office, the client shall be responsible to compensate the Law Firm for the reasonable value of their services. Such transfer shall not include documents or attorney work product regarding the general liability of the defendants.

6. APPEALS: The above contingency fee does not contemplate any appeal. The Law Firm are under no duty to perfect or prosecute such appeal until a satisfactory fee arrangement is made in writing regarding costs and counsel fees.

7. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS: We understand that any lawsuit must be commenced within a certain limited time period, (that may vary, depending upon the defendant) starting from the "discovery of the injury" or of "the date when through the exercise of reasonable diligence such injury should have been discovered… whichever is earlier". We further understand that the Statute of Limitations period for any case must be investigated, and that this Agreement is made subject to that investigation as well as an investigation of the entire case.

8. FINANCING OF CASE: If the firm borrows money from any lending institution to finance the cost of the client’s case, the amounts advanced by this firm to pay the cost of prosecuting or defending a claim or action or otherwise protecting or promoting the client’s interest will bear interest at the highest lawful rate allowed by applicable law. In no event will the interest be greater than the amount paid by the firm to the lending institution.

9. RESULTS NOT GUARANTEED: No attorney can accurately predict the outcome of any legal matter, accordingly, no representations are made, either expressly or impliedly, as to the final outcome of this matter. We further understand that we must immediately report any changes in address and telephone number to the Law Firm.

10. APPROVAL NECESSARY FOR SETTLEMENT: Attorneys are hereby granted a power of attorney so that they may have full authority to prepare, sign and file all legal instruments, pleadings, drafts, authorizations, and papers as shall be reasonably necessary to conclude this representation, including settlement and/or reducing to possession any and all monies or other things of value due to the Client under the claim as fully as the Client could do so in person. Attorneys are also authorized and empowered to act as Client’s negotiator in any and all negotiations concerning the subject of this Agreement.

11. ASSOCIATION OF OTHER ATTORNEYS: The Law Firm may, at its own expense, use or associate other attorneys in the representation of the aforesaid claims of the Client. Client understands that Law Firm employs numerous attorneys that may work on Client’s case.

12. ASSOCIATE COUNSEL: The Client acknowledges and agrees that the Law Firms of Napoli Shkolnik, Ventura & Ribeiro, PLLC d/b/a Ventura Law and Frazer, PLC shall assume responsibility for the client and shall split their fees as follows: Napoli Shkolnik 45%, Ventura & Ribeiro, PLLC d/b/a Ventura Law shall be entitled to 35% and Frazer, PLC shall be entitled to 20%. The Law Firm may participate in the division of fees in this case and assume joint responsibility for the representation of the client either in the event that the Attorney retains associate counsel or that the client later chooses new counsel, provided that the total fee to the client does not increase as a result of the division of fees and that the attorneys involved have agreed to the division of fees and assumption of joint responsibility. The Client will be advised of such joint responsibility and full disclosure will be made to Client regarding the division of fees so that the consent of the Client can be obtained.

13. NEW YORK OR APPLICABLE LAW TO APPLY: This Agreement shall be considered construed under and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York applicable law and the rights, duties, and obligations of Client and of Attorneys regarding Attorney’s representation of Client and regarding anything covered by this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York or applicable law.

14. PARTIES BOUND: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal representative, successors, and assigns. Client or the Law Firm can execute this document electronically, by indicating “I agree” (or similar language) via electronic mail after receiving the Agreement via electronic mail. By indicating “I agree” (or similar language) Client will be bound by the terms of the Agreement and is executing the document electronically via Client’s electronic signature, indicated as “/s/” in the signature field and elects the Law Firm advance disbursements.

15. LEGAL CONSTRUCTION: In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions thereof and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein.

16. PRIOR AGREEMENTS SUPERSEDED: This Agreement constitutes the sole and only Agreement of the parties hereto and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreement between the parties respecting the within subject matter.

We certify and acknowledge that we have had the opportunity to read this Agreement and have answered any questions pertaining thereto. We further state that we have voluntarily entered into this Agreement fully aware of the terms and conditions.

[remainder of page intentionally left blank]
SIGNED AND ACCEPTED ON THIS ______day of___________________, 2026

THIS CONTRACT IS SUBJECT TO ARBITRATION

UNDER THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT AND

THE NEW YORK GENERAL ARBITRATION STATUTE

CITY OF CHOWCHILLA, CA
By: ________

______________________________________
Printed Name
Email Address: _____________________
Title:_______________________________
Address: ___________________________
____________________________________

NAPOLI SHKOLNIK
________________________________
_________________________________
Printed Name of Attorney

VENTURA & RIBEIRO, PLLC
dba VENTURA LAW
________________________________
_________________________________
Printed Name of Attorney

FRAZER, PLC
________________________________
_________________________________
Printed Name of Attorney

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Item 4.1

CLICK HERE

TO RETURN TO

THE AGENDA
Meeting of: February 24, 2026
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING TO DISCUSS SUBMITTAL OF A 2025 COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION
PREPARED BY: Christina Soares, Administrative Analyst
APPROVED BY: Joe Roman, Deputy Director of Public Works

REVIEWED BY
ADMINISTRATOR ☒ REVIEWED BYATTORNEY ☒ REVIEWED BY FINANCE ☒ RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council open the public hearing to gather community input and provide direction to staff on the development of grant applications totaling up to $3.6 million in State Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding under the 2025 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA).

BACKGROUND:

The California Department of Housing and Community Development announced that approximately $27 million in funding is available through the federal Small Cities CDBG for the 2025 funding year, as outlined in a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) released on September 30, 2025.

The objectives of the CDBG program are to develop viable communities by providing decent, affordable housing and a suitable living environment, and to expand economic opportunities, principally for the benefit of low- and moderate-income persons, families, households, and neighborhoods.

Eligible activities under the CDBG NOFA include infrastructure in support of new housing projects, housing acquisition and rehabilitation programs, community facilities, public services, planning studies, and economic development programs. All eligible activities funded by State CDBG must meet one of the three National Objectives: benefit to low- and moderate-income households or persons (also called LowModerate Income (LMI)); aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight; or meet an urgent community development need (a need resulting from a state or federally declared disaster).

The City may apply for up to $3.6 million under the 2025 NOFA for a combination of up to three activities that can be submitted under a competitive application process. There are no match requirements, and administrative funds are available up to 7% of the award amount. The Application portal opened on February 1, 2026, at 9:00 AM PST and closes on April 3, 2026, at 3:00 PM PST. Awards are expected to be announced in September 2026 and will have a two-year and nine-month expenditure period.

The purpose of this Public Hearing is to give citizens an opportunity to make comments on CDBG eligible activities, collect residents’ views on housing and community development needs (which include services, facilities, and/or infrastructure that will improve livability within the community), and to gain input on the proposed applications.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

The City anticipates submitting three applications under the 2025 NOFA CDBG funding application for up to $3.6 million in funding as follows:

1. Public Improvement Project – Kings Ave Storm Drain Improvements $3,261,969

2. Planning & Technical Assistance – Water Master Plan $203,000

3. Planning & Technical Assistance – Sewer Master Plan $97,000 When the Public Hearing is opened, citizens are encouraged to ask questions and/or comment on the proposed activities/application or on any aspect of the CDBG Program. Citizens are also invited to submit written comments to the City at the Civic Center Plaza at 130 S. Second Street, Chowchilla, CA 93610 or to review information on the CDBG Program.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The costs and available funding for the Kings Ave Storm Drain Improvements project were included in the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Budget and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and would fully be funded by the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), as would both Planning and Technical Assistance projects.

ALTERNATIVES:

As this Public Hearing is to receive and accept comments from the public, no alternatives are suggested at this time.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:

A resolution will be presented to the City Council at a future meeting for approval, following Council direction to proceed with preparation of the project applications.

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Item 6.1

CLICK HERE

TO RETURN TO

THE AGENDA
Meeting of: February 24, 2026
AGENDA SECTION: New Business
SUBJECT: Consideration of the Madera County Economic Development Commission’s 2026-2027 Fiscal Year Basic Service Level Budget Proposal PREPARED BY: Joann McClendon, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS: MCEDC Memo, Presentation

REVIEWED BY
ADMINISTRATOR ☒ REVIEWED BYATTORNEY ☒ REVIEWED BY FINANCE ☒ RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council consider approving, by roll call vote, the Madera County Economic Development Commission’s proposed 2026-2027 annual basic service level budget at the rate of $39,842.58.

BACKGROUND:

Kristina Gallagher, MCEDC Executive Director, has submitted a memo to the Council requesting 2026/2027 Basic Level Budget Funding. The proposed budget request is $39,842.58, up by $53.07 compared to the 2025/2026 request of $39,789.51.

Please refer to the attached Memo for additional details.

FISCAL IMPACT:
$39,842.58 from a combination of the City’s General Fund and CDBG Funds.

ALTERNATIVES:

Do not approve.

OVERVIEW
• Madera County Economic Development
Commission (MCEDC)
• Marketing
• Lead Generation/Tracking
• Market Overview/MCEDC Projects
• Legislation
• Memberships/Affiliations
• Budget

WHAT IS THE MADERA COUNTY ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (MCEDC)?
The MCEDC is a Joint Powers Authority representing the County of Madera, the City of Madera, and the City of Chowchilla. We are dedicated to improving the economic condition of Madera County by attracting new businesses, supporting local business growth, and fostering strategic partnerships that enhance prosperity and quality of life.

MISSION
• To position Madera County and its cities as economically viable and vibrant by pursuing all avenues of growth for new and existing businesses, with the goal of maximizing employment opportunities, tax base and quality of life.

WHAT IS THE MADERA COUNTY ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (MCEDC)?
WHAT DOES MCEDC DO?
• Business attraction, expansion, and retention
• Site selection assistance
• Access to incentives and workforce programs
• Economic data and community insights
• Financing support through local loan programs
VISION
• Enhance the local economy
• Create strategic partnerships
• Enhance the quality of life for Madera residents
• Create living wage jobs opportunities

MARKETING

TRADE SHOWS/MISSIONS/NETWORKING
• The International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC)
• California Central Valley EDC (CCVEDC)
• Team California
• MCEDC attended 9 missions and 8 trade shows/conferences in FY 2024-2025

SITE SELECTORS/BROKERS MEETINGS

PUBLICATIONS
• Annual Report
• Marketing Packet
• Bi-Annual Real Estate Update
• Five Year Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)

DIGITAL MARKETING
E-BIZ
• Monthly Electronic Newsletter
• Over 800 Subscribers

REDESIGNED WEBSITE
• Updated website
• Updates on new developments
• FAQ Page
• Blog
• Monthly Agendas and Minutes
• Website property database

SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING
Facebook
• Over 2,300 followers
Instagram
• 140 new followers
• 134 new posts
LinkedIn
• 94 new followers
X (Twitter)

SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING

LOCAL BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS
• At MCEDC, we are dedicated to helping local businesses grow. To support this effort, we have partnered with local chambers and businesses to highlight one business each week from Madera County, and the cities of Madera and Chowchilla. These spotlights showcase both new and established businesses, increasing visibility and encouraging community support. Our goal is to promote residents to shop local, connect businesses with customers and contribute to a thriving economy.

City of Chowchilla Business Highlights: Mario’s Traditional Mexican Food Restaurant, Behind the Barn Door, The Sweet Lemon Shack, Be Sweet & Treats

LEAD GENERATION/TRACKING

COMPLETE AND RETURN REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS
• MCEDC Website - #1 Lead Generator
• Central California EDC (CCVEDC)
• GO-Biz - Business Ready Sites Program
• Business Ready Sites Program, designed to showcase fully zoned and entitled sites across California that are ideal for headquarters, research and development, and industrial manufacturing facilities.

The program aims to help businesses and site selectors quickly identify and access development-ready locations. MCEDC has successfully submitted a business ready site within Madera County, which has been approved and is now live on the GO-Biz website, with additional sites currently under review. As of now, a total of only 26 properties are listed across California.
• Broker Requests
• Site Selection Companies

MARKET OVERVIEW
• The Madera County industrial market remains strong and highly competitive, with vacancy rates dropping to 0.8%, well below the 5- year (3.1%) and 10-year (2.1%) averages. Only 140,000 square feet are available (1.4% availability), with 56,000 square feet underway versus the 10-year average of 150,000, according to CoStar Reports.

Limited supply and sustained demand continue to highlight Madera County’s appeal for industrial users.

MARKET OVERVIEW
• In the retail market, Madera County’s retail vacancy rose to 5.7% in Q3 2025, up 1.7% over the year, exceeding the 5 and 10-year averages of around 4%. MCEDC continues to be actively engaged in discussions with a diverse range of businesses exploring opportunities in Madera County and its two cities. These include companies considering establishing a presence in the area, those planning to expand existing operations, and others seeking strategic guidance to chart the most effective path for future growth and development.

MCEDC PROJECTS
• MCEDC continues to be actively engaged in confidential discussions with a diverse range of businesses exploring opportunities in the County of Madera and its cities. These include companies considering establishing a presence in the area, those planning to expand existing operations, and others seeking strategic guidance to chart the most effective path for future growth and development. Efforts include pursuing state and local incentives and proactively addressing potential challenges.

LEGISLATION
• Updates on state legislation, deadlines and laws as they relate to economic development
• Participation in Legislative Conferences
• New Legislative Principles Document
• Legislative Mission Trip for MCEDC Executive Committee • Legislation Tracking - CapitolTrack
• Position Letters

MEMBERSHIPS/AFFILIATIONS
• Workforce Development Board of Madera County
• California Association for Local Economic Development (CALED) • California Central Valley Economic Development Corporation (CCVEDC) • Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (Go-Biz) • Greater Madera County Industrial Association (GMCIA)
• Society of Industrial and Office Realtors (SIOR)
• TEAMCA
• Commercial Real Estate Development Association (NAIOP) • International Council of Shopping (ICSC)
• Local Chambers
• Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E)

FISCAL YEAR COMPARISONS
FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027