Cities Index.
Staff Report Mobilehome Administrative Fee FY23 - 22-0106.pdf

Chula Vista City Council
May 10, 2022

Document
Staff Report Mobilehome Administrative Fee FY23 - 22-0106.pdf
Meeting
May 10, 2022
Body
Chula Vista City Council
Original file
706 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-chulavista.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

v . 0 03 P a g e | 1
May 10, 2022

ITEM TITLE
Mobilehome Rent Control: Retain the Existing $12 Administrative Fee for Mobilehome Rent Control Services for Fiscal Year 2022/23

Report Number: 22-0106
Location: No specific geographic location
Department: Development Services
Environmental Notice : The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to S tate Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

Recommended Action
Adopt a resolution accepting Chapter 18 (Mobilehomes) of the City’s Master Fee Schedule and retaining the existing $12 administrative fee for Fiscal Year 2022/23.

SUMMARY

Effective August 18, 2011, the City of Chula Vista , under Chula Vista Municipal Code ( “CVMC”) Section

9.50.030, established an Administrative Fee to be assessed upon all eligible mobilehome residents receiving benefits and services u nder CVMC Chapter 9.50 (“Chapter 9.50” or the “Ordinance” ) – Mobilehome Park Space Rent Review. Chapter 9.50 requires that the Administrative Fee be established annually by the action of the City Council. Staff recommends retaining the fee at $12 for fiscal year 2022-23 (“FY 23”).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with CEQA and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required.

BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Mobilehome Rent Review Commission voted 4-0 at their April 21, 2022, meeting to recommend approval of the Administrative Fee at $12 for FY23.

P a g e | 2

DISCUSSION
Chapter 9.50 offers unique benefits and services solely to eligible mobilehome residents. As part of the annual Administrative Fee update process, staff is reporting out on prior year revenues and expenditures to establish the amount necessary to recover the costs of administering Chapter 9.50. This report provides an update on revenues and expenditures for July 1, 20 21 - June 30, 2022, and the fee recommendation for FY

23. Fiscal Year 2021-22 (“FY 22”) Projected Revenues and Expenditures Revenues for FY 22 were anticipated to total $ 26,400 based on 2,200 residents paying a fee of $12. Actual payments were received from 2, 354 eligible spaces, resulting in total collected revenues of $ 28,256. A summary of revenues and projected expenditures is provided in Table 1, followed by a description of related activities.

Table 1
FY 22 BUDGET SUMMARY
Budgeted Projected
Revenues:

Fund Balance as of 7/1/21 $ 247,608
Fee Revenues $ 26,400 $ 28,256
Investment Earnings $ 0
TOTAL FUNDS $275,864
Expenditures:

Staff Charges $ 32,000 $ 32,000
Experts $ 25,000 $ 0
Administrative/Billing Costs $ 4,000 $ 4,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 36,000
Projected Surplus/Deficit $239,864

Staff Charges
Administration of Chapter 9.50 is projected to result in staff charges of $32,000 for FY 22. Staff provided the following services:
 Ombudsman Activities (Office Visits & Mobilehome Information Line) – Staff responded bilingually to all inquiries related to Chapter 9.50.
 Resident Invoicing Preparation – A June 1 st billing and/or ineligible notice was sent to all mobilehome/trailer residents. In August, reminder notices were sent to all residents with a balance due and to those residents determined ineligible.
 Fee Collection – Collection and processing of fee payments received. This fiscal year an online portal was added for electronic payments, resulting in additional administrative expenses for maintenance issues.
 Database Maintenance – Maintained the database with current resident information.  Mobilehome Rent Review Commission (“MHRRC”) Educational Meetings - Provided general ombudsman related activities to residents.

P a g e | 3
 Annual Permissive Rent Calculations - Twice a year, the Consumer Price Index (CP I) is released .

Notification was sent to all park owners and managers of the annual permissive rate as calculated under CVMC Section 9.50.050.
 Rent Review Inquiries/Hearing Administration – Staff coordinated inquiries regarding rental increases between residents and park management as needed.

Experts
No rent review hearings or hiring of experts was necessary during FY 22. Funds collected will be available to appropriate in FY 23 for hiring of experts if a second rent review case is required. The lack of hearings also resulted in staff time reimbursement savings to the program.

Administrative Costs (Postage, Office Supplies and Printing) In FY 22, the billing of the administrative fee was contracted out for the fifth year. Additional annual administrative costs, including CPI notices and publication of this hearing notice were incurred.

FY 23 Budget and Administrative Fee
Staff recommends the existing $12 Administrative Fee be retained for FY 23 due to the current fund balance and lack of rent review hearing activity. Important factors taken into consideration include:
 Since the ordinance amendments in 2012, no rent review cases have been heard for existing residents.

However, two rent review cases began the process (Rancho Bonita in fiscal year 2014 -15 and El Mirador in fiscal year 2017-18). In both cases, the rent increases were agreed upon between resident and owner prior to hearing. Prior to the 2012 amendments, existing resid ent rent review cases occurred approximately every other year. Therefore, staff has forecasted expenditures with one case every three years. This is a change from prior forecasting of every other year.  Staff costs to administer the fee and rent review services have remained stable.  Since the fee has been reduced to $30 or less, more residents have been consistently paying.

Therefore, projections remain at 2,200 residents to pay this coming year.

Table 2 provides a summary of the FY 23 budget which anticipates one rent review case and a contingency of $25,000 for expert time related to one additional case, if needed, with an estimated ending fund balance of $181,264.

Table 2
FY 23 BUDGET SUMMARY
Budget
Revenues:

Projected Fund Balance as of 7/1/22 $ 239,864
Anticipated Fee Revenues (2,200 @ $12) $ 26,400
Expenditures:

Staff Charges $ 55,000
Experts $ 25,000
Administrative/Billing Costs $ 5,000
TOTAL ANTICIPATED EXPENDITURES $ 85,000
Anticipated Fund Balance as of 6/30/23 $ 206,264
Contingency for Experts $ 25,000
P a g e | 4
Anticipated Surplus/Deficit $ 181,264

With the existing fee of $12, annual revenues alone will not cover costs if heavy administrative costs are expended in any given year. Therefore, fund balance would then be used to maintain administrative services.

If cases were to occur every third year, program funds would rapidly be depleted. For this reason, staff does not recomme nd any lowering of the fee rate going forward. Account projections based on differing fee amounts and assuming cases every third year are detailed in Table 3 below.

Table 3

FUND BALANCE PROJECTIONS

Given current workload and few actual cases, staff has projected being able to maintain the fee for several years at $12 and will make further considerations to changes in the fee if any cases are heard in the next few years.

DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staff has determined that the action contemplated by this item is ministerial, secretarial, manual, or clerical in nature and, as such, does not require the City Council members to make or participate in making a governmental decision, pursuant to Californ ia Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18704(d)(1).

Consequently, this item does not present a conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.).

Staff is not independently aware and has not been informed by any Cit y Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.

CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
There is no current year fiscal impact to the General Fund as a result of this action.

P a g e | 5

ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
There are no ongoing fiscal impacts to the General Fund as a result of this action. Staff time and costs associated with the administration of Chapter 9.50 are anticipated in the collected fee and will be adopted as part of the fiscal year 2022-23 budget.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Proposed Chapter 18 - Master Fee Schedule
Staff Contact: Mark Barnard, Management Analyst I
Tiffany Allen, Director of Development Services

← All documents from this meeting