1. Regarding Agenda Item 8.2: The funds appropriated should be rightly, of course, no more than what the current City Attorney would be paid if he was not resigning; That would of course be the most prudent use of taxpayers funds according to Council-members fiduciary duties.
2. Regarding a reported attempt to change the designations of the University land set aside long ago, the Council needs to (must) know that citizens in our supposed-to-be democracy, clearly and obviously want the land set aside for a University to remain completely and in total as it was designated originally, for a university, Not for residential or other uses, including Not for thousands of residential units. It appears a nonresident politician is spearheading that attempt to use the land for developers of residential units, a legerdemain slight-of-hand opposing the designation already in place (somewhat limited by special interests already) for a University the community of residents want and have designated. Please know that we residents demand the council to safeguard and follow through with the clear desires of your voters as referenced above, and Stop any change other than Expanding the land for University use, only.
Sincerely,
Todd G. Glanz, Esq./Attorney at Law & Chula Vista resident
Written Communications - Item 8.2 and Public Comment
Glanz - Received 2/21/2023