Cities Index.
Item 7.1 - Applicant PPT_CC 01.16.24 Mtg.pdf

Chula Vista City Council
January 16, 2024

Document
Item 7.1 - Applicant PPT_CC 01.16.24 Mtg.pdf
Meeting
January 16, 2024
Body
Chula Vista City Council
Original file
2.9 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-chulavista.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

AT&T New Site Build Appeal
Hearing
CAL02890
430 2nd Ave.

Chula Vista, CA 91910
January 2024

2PROPERTY OF MD7
Target Area Summary
• Coverage Objective for this site includes
2nd Ave, G Street, Temple Beth Shalom,
and Hilltop Dr.
• This location is roughly bordered by F
Street to the north, 1st Avenue to the
east, H Street to the south, and Third
Avenue to the west. This gap area
includes hundreds of homes, houses of
worship, commercial areas, busy roads,
and other points of interest in the
vicinity.
• The proposed structure is a 45’ mono-
broadleaf faux tree.

3PROPERTY OF MD7
Public Concerns Raised From Four
Households
There is one Appellant for this Project
• Height of Structure
• Disputed need for
Proposed Site Coverage
• Community Integration
• Setbacks
• Crime
• Points of Access
• Underground Equipment
4PROPERTY OF MD7
AT&T New Site Build
CAL02890
430 2nd Ave.

Chula Vista, CA 91910

5PROPERTY OF MD7
Current Coverage
Purple Circle = Proposed Site
Yellow Circle = 740 Hilltop Drive
Blue Circle = 301 E. Palomar Street
6PROPERTY OF MD7
Site Location in proximity to recently approved
Wireless projects
7PROPERTY OF MD7
Current Coverage

8PROPERTY OF MD7
Coverage with CAL02890

9PROPERTY OF MD7
Site location in proximity to recently
approved AT&T Projects
• The distance between Project CUP22-0052 (430 2nd Avenue) and CUP22-0044 (740 Hilltop Drive) is 0.9 miles and the coverage of the project 740 Hilltop Drive is a maximum of 0.4 miles, therefore it is not possible to achieve coverage objectives.
• The distance between CUP22-0052 (430 2nd Avenue) and CUP22-0048 (301 E.

Palomar Street) is even greater at 2.4 miles, therefore it is not possible to cover the objectives of 430 2nd Avenue with 301 E. Palomar Street. • Height limitations/restrictions on the two previously approved projects Hilltop Drive and Palomar Street limit their coverage radius, making our 430 2nd Avenue project necessary to address coverage needs.
10PROPERTY OF MD7
Photo Simulation 1 – View looking Northwest from 2nd
Avenue

11PROPERTY OF MD7
Photo Simulation 2 – View looking South from 2nd
Avenue

12PROPERTY OF MD7
Photo Simulation 3 - View looking West from 2nd Avenue

13PROPERTY OF MD7
Photo Simulation 4 – View looking Northeast from Church Parking Lot

14PROPERTY OF MD7
Photo Simulation 5 - View looking Southwest From 2nd Avenue with Proposed Landscaping

15PROPERTY OF MD7
Smart City Chula Vista
Chula Vista stands at the forefront of the global smart city initiative, spearheading advancements with cutting-edge technology and sophisticated data analytics tools aimed at enhancing the quality of life and fostering economic development. The city's dedication to smart city innovation is evident in its comprehensive strategic plan and a multitude of ongoing initiatives.

Some of these ongoing initiatives include:
• Network Upgrades
• Smart Transportation
• Police Dispatch Modernization
• Unmanned Aerial Systems including Drones used by the Chula Vista Police Department, rely on AT&T’s FirstNet and commercial networks to provide real-time information to First Responders.
16PROPERTY OF MD7
AT&T’s Commitment to Public Safety
• This site coverage increase is crucial for the additional coverage and capacity it will add for FirstNet.
• FirstNet is a nationwide, high-speed wireless broadband network and set of specialized, innovative tools, technologies and features specifically built for public safety. FirstNet is designed for every first responder in the country – career or volunteer; city, state, tribal or federal; and urban, suburban or rural. Think firefighters, EMS personnel, law enforcement, 9-1-1 communicators and emergency managers. FirstNet is also available to a community of users who are critical to supporting an emergency response – including nurses and physicians or utility companies that clear downed power lines and manage gas leaks.
• Dedicated frequency to clear a communication highway in times of emergency
• “In California 85% of 911 calls are made from a wireless device”
• AT&T sole deployer of FirstNet

17PROPERTY OF MD7
Alternative Site #1 – 398 H Street (7/11)
• This address is located 0.6 miles away from the
proposed site location.
• Co-location would require an increase in height for the coverage and capacity to include the targeted
residential zones / land use.
• Modification to the existing WCF would provide less
coverage and capacity due to the surrounding built
environment and would not benefit the community to
the same extent as the current proposal.

18PROPERTY OF MD7
Alternative Site #2 – 287 G Street
• This proposed site is located 0.3 miles away from the proposed area.
• A site at this location would not have been feasible:
• The location has limited parking. A standalone
structure would consume usable space in an
already limited area.
• A rooftop facility would not allow completion of the
AT&T network. The height of the building is around
28-feet and is surrounded by high vegetation and
buildings that would interfere with the cell service.

19PROPERTY OF MD7
Alternative #3 – 744 F St.
• This site was suggested by Appellant (Mr. Daley).
• This site is located over a mile away from the proposed target area.
• There is an existing AT&T tower located at this property that is already servicing the area.
• Due to this locations distance away from our target area, and being serviced by an existing AT&T facility, aco-location or increase in power at this location will not solve the issue that is presented at the current location,

20PROPERTY OF MD7
Alternative Site #4 – 1642 Silvas Street
• This site was proposed and suggested by Appellant (Mr.

Daley).
• This site is located 3 miles away from the proposed location and beyond AT&T’s target area.
• Similar to the site at 744 F. St, due to this locations distance from our target area, and being serviced by an existing AT&T facility, a co-location or increase in power at this location will not solve the issue that is presented at the current location. • Overall, the distance of this alternative location from AT&T’s target area does not accomplish the objectives of the project.

21PROPERTY OF MD7
Additional Towers in Vicinity
Carrier / Owner Distance Address
SBA 2012 TC Assets, LLC

0.9 mi 740 Hilltop Dr. – Shown On Coverage MapsAT&T
Verizon 1.2 mi 230 Broadway
ACME Commercial Properties LLC 1.2 mi 346 L Street
AT&T 1.3 mi 744 F Street
Verizon 1.7 mi 1072 3rd Avenue
Verizon 1.7 mi 402 Moonview Dr
LSP South Bay, LLC 2.1 mi 990 Bay Blvd.

Octagon Towers, LLC 2.4 mi 2005 Highland Ave
AT&T 2.4 mi 301 E. Palomar Street – Shown On Coverage Maps SBA 2012 TC Assets, LLC 2.5 mi 545 E. Naples St
Verizon 2.5 mi 1265 Nolan Ave
Verizon 2.6 mi 2415 East 18th Street
Towers in vicinity are not feasible due to location and coverage objectives.

Questions?
January 2024

← All documents from this meeting