1. CALL TO ORDER
Public Comments:
2. ROLL CALL
Public Comments:
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE Public Comments:
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
Public Comments:
4.1 Oath of Office
Public Comments:
Charles Sanfilippo - Planning Commission
4.2 Chula Vista Bayfront Update by Port Commissioner Ann Moore Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Item 4.2 - Bayfront Update Ann Moore CV Council Presentation NO NOTES.pdf
4.3 Presentation of a Proclamation Proclaiming September 10, 2024 as San Diego County Teacher of the Year, Ms. Ekstein Day in the City of Chula Vista Public Comments:
4.4 Presentation of a Proclamation to Celebrate Scripps Health for 100 Years of Caring Public Comments:
5. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 5.1 through 5.5)
Public Comments:
Consent calendar items are considered together and acted upon by one motion. There is no separate discussion of these items unless the Mayor or a City Councilmember removes the item from the consent calendar. Items removed from the consent calendar will be heard as action items.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
To approve t
he recommended actions
appearing below consent calendar Items 5.1 through 5.5. The headings were read, text waived
.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
5.1 Approve Meeting Minutes
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Draft Minutes - August 13, 2024.pdf
2. Draft Minutes - August 20, 2024 4 PM.pdf
3. Draft Minutes - August 20, 2024 415 PM.pdf
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
5.2 Waive Reading of Text of Resolutions and Ordinances Public Comments:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
5.3 Human Relations Commission: Adopt an Ordinance to Amend Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 2.36 “Human Relations Commission” Related to the Functions, Duties, and Membership of the Commission Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Staff Report - 2nd Reading - Human Relations Commission .pdf
2. Ordinance - Amendments CVMC Chapter 2.36.pdf
3. Attachment - Redline Amendments to CVMC 2.36.pdf
4. Attachment - HRC Memo on Proposed Amendments 4-25-2024.pdf
5. Attachment - Human Relations Commission Meeting Minutes from May 23, 2024.pdf
6. Written Communications - Received 8_12 - Acosta.pdf
7. Written Communications - Received 9_9 - Acosta.pdf
Report Number
:
24-0173
L
ocation
:
No specific geographic location
D
epartment
:
City Manager
G.C. § 84308:
No
Environmental Notice
:
The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) State Guidelines. Therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt an ordinance amending various sections in Chapter 2.36 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code “Human Relations Commission” to amend the functions and duties of the Commission and processes by which Commissioners are nominated and appointed. (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)
5.4 Agreement: Approve an Agreement with T.Y. LIN International to Provide Construction Management Services Related to the Heritage Bridge Replacement and Main Street Widening Projects Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Staff Report - STM386 Award Contract CM - 24-0145.pdf
2. Resolution.pdf
3. Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map.pdf
4. Attachment 2 - Two Party Agreement.pdf
This item was continued from the August 13, 2024 meeting.
Report Number
:
24-0145
L
ocation
:
Heritage Road and Main Street between Entertainment Circle North and Nirvana Avenue D
epartment
:
Engineering
G.C. § 84308:
No
Environmental Notice
:
The Project is adequately covered in a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) IS-17-001 (SCH No. 2017021078) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and any addenda for the Heritage Road Bridge Replacement Project. Under NEPA, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has determined that the Project is a Categorical Exclusion under 23 USC 327.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt a resolution approving a consultant services agreement with T.Y. LIN International to perform Construction Management Services for Federal Project BRLS-5203(039): City projects Heritage Bridge Replacement (STM0386) and Main Street Widening (STM0388).
5.5 Housing Funding: Amending Resolution No. 2024-119 to Restructure Loan Commitment to Project Located at 610 Paseo Del Rey Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Housing Funding - Amending a Loan Commitment of $3,300,000 to 610 Paseo Del Rey - 24-0235.pdf
2. Resolution(1).pdf
Report Number
:
24-0235
L
ocation
:
610 Paseo Del Rey
D
epartment
:
Housing and Homeless Services
G.C. § 84308:
No
Environmental Notice
:
The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
State Guidelines. Therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the activity qualifies for an exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines.
Under National Environmental Policy Act, Federal funds constitute a portion of the proposed loan for pre-development and construction costs of the affordable housing project. A final reservation of federal funds shall occur only upon satisfactory completion of the environmental review and receipt by the City of Chula Vista and a release of funds from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) under 24 CFR Part 58 of the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”); provided, however, that any funds disbursed to the Project prior to a final NEPA determination shall only be pre-development activities categorically excluded from NEPA pursuant to 24 CFR Part 58.35(b)(6).
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt a resolution amending Resolution No. 2024-119 to restructure an affordable housing loan commitment of $3,300,000 to Wakeland Housing and Development Corporation (“Wakeland”) to allow up to $500,000 in funds to also be used for pre-development purposes, in order to meet disbursement deadlines imposed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). (4/5
V
ote
R
equired)
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Written Communications - Diez de Bonilla.pdf
2. Public Comments - Acosta 1 - Received 9_9.pdf
3. Public Comments - Acosta 2 - Received 9_9.pdf
4. Public Comments - Acosta 3 - Received 9_9.pdf
5. Public Comments.pdf
6. Written Communications - Romeo.pdf
7. Written Communications - PC - Item 6 - Montoya-Cesena.pdf Khawla Masoud
Camping bans criminalize houselessness. This is not an effective way to address the very real problem we have in this city. Unhoused people deserve a safe place to live wherever they are. Do not punish the already marginalized and disenfranchised populations of this city.
Sebastian Martinez
I strongly oppose the passing of an Encampment Restriction Ordinance for the following reasons. 1) The majority of the proposed ordinance is already in effect proving that it will not adequately address homelessness is any meaningful way. 2) Being unhoused is fundamentally an issue of poverty and this ordinance does not address (according the city’s own reports) the leading cause of homelessness - job loss. Criminalization, which is what this is, is reflective of our values or lack there of if the ordinance is passed.
Isabella Rios
I am strongly opposed to this act that criminalizes our unhoused neighbors. Most people are just one pay check away from losing stable housing. Instead, we must address the root causes of housing instability: lack of affordable housing, low wages, and the increasing cost of living.
Caroline Hallman
Please don’t further criminalize homelessness. Let’s come together as a county and solve this in a humane way. There have been several successful pilot programs of universal basic income or housing first around the country. Look at Denver for one example of how housing the homeless has been successful! Please don’t criminalize poverty more than it already is. These are very poor people, many of them of ill health. Banning camping is cruel. My unhoused neighbors are human beings!! Aubriel D
I am opposing camp ordinance as the 500 + houseless people do not have a set home to moved into as you would be forcibly displacing them for the utmost time. With no plan of longevity in place, I don’t see how my tax dollars that go towards the state will be beneficial to this project of destruction.
Robert Werner
Where do we all agree? We face a crisis of poverty in our community. It directly affects all of us- the housed, the unhoused, and the housing insecure. The status quo is unsustainable. Too much money has been spent on unproductive solutions. The crisis is complicated and worsening. We all want those suffering to experience relief and stability. Can we come together within these premises?
From this place of solidarity, I ask for us to look at a crucial fork in the road on our path to addressing this crisis. Our city's housing dept. website, contains several instances where a distinction is made between "the unsheltered" and "community members." The implication is that one is a problem the other must deal with. Choosing this path, we cease to see our unsheltered brothers and sisters as community members. We relinquish responsibility, as we dehumanize those who are most in need. It is of this path that this ban is born. To criminalize poverty is to barricade our community into exclusivity, where those who fall victim to the most extreme trauma, mental illness and even plain old bad luck are ineligible for membership. This ban does not clean our streets. It simply sanitizes the stain of abdicating our duty to face our suffering neighbors directly, and meet them where they're at.
There are better solutions, looming in our collective empathy and courage. But they'll only be found on the path where all are embraced as respected members of the community, and are treated as such.
Patricia
This act only worsens the issue. We have to get to the root causes of homelessness.
Alex frezer
Hello,
I strongly oppose this camping ban as it directly, negatively impacts our houseless neighbors. This is an violent act towards a group of folks who need our immediate support. This ban can lead to valuables being stolen, bodily harm being done, and also lead to death. With the lack of city support in general, this camping ban will just make conditions worse and lead to folks being even further away from stability and finding housing. Please do not let this pass.
Thank you.
Celia Cruz-Elmassian, LCSW
Camping bans are not an effective method of fighting homelessness. This puts people’s lives in danger. Housing first has been proven to work, as seen in Denver, CO. NO to camping bans Tiffany Avila
Encampment bans do not solve or help the issue on homelessness. it leads to deadly situations for our unhoused neighbors including loosing their belongings and worsened conditions for people with disabilities. ‘Camping Ordinance’ is not a solution.
Nate Bartley
As a Chula Vista citizen, Camping bans and restriction ordinances are not satisfactory ways to address homelessness. especially as we are entering one for the hottest months this year. Camping ordinances lead to theft of property, injury, and death.
Isabella Martinez
To criminalize a population you are not helping or serving is wrong. As someone who has worked in the unsheltered space in this city for years. I know that those pallet shelters are not being used and the money meant to help these folks is lining your pockets instead. Criminalizing poverty will be stain on this city which quite frankly makes me ashamed to have grown up here. If this is the direction we’re moving, I hope you never befall, trauma, or a bad financial situation, and end up on the street. Because guess what, it’s more likely than not for most people in our city. It may not be for you while you’re sitting in your comfy chairs in your air-conditioning in the city Council meeting, but block over or right across the street people are suffering and you want to arrest them for it. Please make the correct decision and don’t criminalize poverty. Have a heart.
Karen Clay
Moving the "problem" from one budget area to another is not going to solve this problem. You can do better than this and actually find a win-win solution for all if you want to.
Rosa Vasquez
On Tuesday, September 10th, our city will transition from compassion to criminalization of individuals living in poverty. The city will vote to pass new policies that make it illegal to sit, stand or sleep on city property targeting unsheltered individuals.
This decision, being made due to the homeless industrial complex now institutionalized in our county and city, will change the very fabric of our community.
Some day someone you love, know or care about may suffer trauma or a "lifequake" that takes them out. Loss of a loved one, loss of a marriage, Domestic Violence, loss of employment, loss of health, a mental/ medical trauma crisis... all of the above.
They may end up housing insecure, street bound, rough sleeping, couch surfing, car dwelling or self-medicating. All very real situations. This level of poverty is rarely a choice.
On Tuesday, your HOT TEAM will share that there is help, that this level of trauma is a choice. They will share that it should be unacceptable for a senior in poverty and trauma to sit, sleep or stand where any of us might see them. Lack of affordable housing is the root cause of seniors ending up unsheltered.
They say, after millions of dollars, that there is help, just waiting for those who need it. If that's the truth, after building the dream team of help, our CV unsheltered population continues to grow with staggering numbers in our senior population.
Resident
Would like the City Manager’s Office to address why it knew about Cardenas’s fraud but did nothing. We recently learned Cardenas earned one day of jail and community service for her misdeeds. We see that most of Council was connected to the Cardenas siblings and they are untrustworthy—what a corrupt city.
Twenty-one minutes are scheduled for the public to address the City Council for three minutes each on any matter within the jurisdiction of the City Council that is not on the agenda. The remaining speakers, if any, will be heard during the continued Public Comment period.
7. ACTION ITEMS
Public Comments:
7.1 Consider Items Removed From the Consent Calendar, if Any Public Comments:
Consider items removed from the consent calendar by the Mayor or a City Councilmember, if any. If no items were removed from the consent calendar, this item will be withdrawn.
7.2 Unsheltered Policy: Consider an Ordinance to Restrict Campsites and Sitting, Lying, Sleeping, or Storage on Specified Public Property Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Staff Report - Encampment Restriction Ordinance - 24-0066.pdf
2. Ordinance Adding Division XII and Chapter 9.90.pdf
3. Attachment 1 - Map - Schools, Grades 1-12.pdf
4. Attachment 2 - Map - City Parks.pdf
5. Attachment 3 - Map - Major Transit Stops.pdf
6. Attachment 4 - Map - MSCP Preserves.pdf
7. Attachment 5 - Map - Restricted Campsite Areas with Buffers.pdf Report Number
:
24-0066
L
ocation
:
No specific geographic location
D
epartment
:
Housing and Homeless Services
G.C. § 84308:
No
Environmental Notice
:
The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Place an ordinance on first reading adding Division XII, “Preservation of Public Property”, and Chapter 9.90, “Campsites and Other Obstructions on Public Property”, to the Chula Vista Municipal Code. (First Reading
)
7.3 Housing Update: Hear a Report on the Chula Vista Residential Tenant Protection Ordinance, Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 9.65 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Staff Report - Report on CVMC 9.65 Residential Tenant Protections - 24-0232.pdf
2. Attachment 1 - Tenant Letter.pdf
3. Written Communications - Raso - Received 9_6.pdf
4. Written Communications - Perez - Received 9_9.pdf
5. Written Communications - Kahelski - Received 9_9.pdf
6. Written Communications - Mors - Received 9_9.pdf
7. Written Communications - Stoddard - Received 9_9.pdf
8. Written Communication - Item 7.3 - Sutton.pdf
9. Item 7.3 - TPO Updates.pdf
Neville Rich
I have numerous properties in the San Diego area. When investing we look for the community offering the most welcoming environment for investors. Unfortunaely for us the current Chula Vista Ordinace removes this community from any consideration. Chula Vista knows what's best for Chula Vista and discouarging investors like me is a goal they have achieved. It's just too risky! Report Number
:
24-0232
L
ocation
:
No specific geographic location
D
epartment
:
Housing and Homeless Services
G.C. § 84308:
No
Environmental Notice
:
The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Council hear the report.
8. PUBLIC COMMENTS (CONTINUED)
Public Comments:
There will be no continued Public Comment period if all speakers present at the first Public Comment period are heard.
9. CITY MANAGER’S REPORTS
Public Comments:
9.1 Update 2024 Fire Risk Reduction Community List
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Item 9.1 - City Manager's Reports - Fire Presentation.pdf
10. MAYOR’S REPORTS
Public Comments:
10.1 Ratification of Appointment to the Following Commissions:
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Ratification of Appointment Memorandum 9.5.24.pdf
2. Applications and Nominations Packet.pdf
3. Item 10.1 - Acosta - Received 9_9.pdf
Board of Appeals and Advisors
- Frank Metayer
Measure A Citizens’ Oversight Committee
- Mayra Estrada
- Joel Monreal
Measure P Citizens’ Oversight Committee
- Christos Korgan
- Sassan Rahimzadeh
Parks and Recreation Commission
- Jessica Fawver
Sustainability Commission
- David Wu
Traffic Safety Commission
- Jorge Marroquin
Veterans Advisory Commission
- Elmer Jimenez
- Ricardo Nava
11. COUNCILMEMBERS’ REPORTS
Public Comments:
11.1 Councilmember Morineau, Ratification of Appointment to the Following Commissions:
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Appointment Memo - Measure P .pdf
2. Clark David - Application.pdf
3. Appointment Memo - PRC .pdf
4. Rodriguez Michelle - Application .pdf
Measure P Citizens' Oversight Committee
- David Clark
Parks and Recreation Commission
- Michelle Rodriguez
12. CITY CLERK'S REPORTS
Public Comments:
13. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
Public Comments:
14. ADJOURNMENT
Public Comments:
to the regular City Council meeting on September 17, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Materials provided to the City Council related to an open session item on this agenda are available for public review, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at [email protected]
or (619) 691-5041.
Sign up at
www.chulavistaca.gov
to receive email notifications when City Council
agendas are published online.