Cities Index.
Attachment 1 - May 2017 Comments and Responses.pdf

Chula Vista City Council
August 11, 2026

Document
Attachment 1 - May 2017 Comments and Responses.pdf
Meeting
August 11, 2026
Body
Chula Vista City Council
Original file
130 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-chulavista.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

ATTACHMENT 3

ISSUES RAISE AT EASTLAKE SELF-STORAGE PROJECT
COMMUNITY MEETING- May 15, 2017
(staff responses include both responses made at the community meeting as well as current responses based upon initial concerns raised)

Comment
Number

Comment Staff Response

1 Concern over traffic generation from proposed
self-storage facility; they would like there to be
some empirical data over actual trip generation
and question the SANDAG trip ge neration
model; concern that traffic is already a problem
and the proposed commercial facility will make
matters worse.

Applicant/staff-this is one of the least
impactive uses in terms of traffic
generation.

A traffic letter prepared by LOS
Engineering dated March 28, 2019,
indicated the projected ADT ’s of the
project are t oo l ow to warrant the
preparation of a Traffic Study.

2 Concern over noise and dust being generated
during the 18 months of construction -recall
what occurred during the construction of SR -
125
Project will be conditioned so that
appropriate Noise and Dust control
measures will be in place prior to
commencement of grading operations.
3 Concern over operational noise especially on
Saturdays; will hours of operation be restricted?

Applicant-they are not proposing a 24
hour operation. A Conditional Use Permit
has been prepared in or der to restrict the
hours of operation. Proposed hours of
operation will be 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.

Monday through Sunday,

3 Lack of p ublic notification -why was there no
formal notifications sent out indicating prior
proposal was no longer being considered?
There is no requirement to provide public
notification to indicate a particular
proposal is no longer being considered.

4 Public notification-request that they send future
notifications beyond 500 foot radius
The c urrent public notice requirement is
500 ft. radius notification for general
notification.

5 Why is the applicant proposing and the City
considering allowing another self -storage
facility when there are three others in the
vicinity?

A Market Study prepared by Haviland
Storage Services in 2019 for the proposed
project which confirmed there is a need
for additional self-storage in the area.

ATTACHMENT 3

6 Jose Martin-would like a copy of environmental
documentation when it is available. Indicated
there is wildli fe and gnatcatchers and other
species.

At the time of preparation of draft
Mitigation Negative Declaration (MND),
a public notice w as mailed to all
residents/property owners within 500 foot
radius of t he pro ject. The MND was
posted onto the City web site and a public
notice of availability for public review
period (September 16, 2019 through
October 16, 2019 ) was m ailed to
residents/property owners within 500 foot
radius of the project.

7. Doesn’t open space mean the site is lik e a
greenbelt area never to be developed.

Jeff (City) drew a distinction between two
types of open space. O nce type is like a
natural preserve/greenbelt area to remain
open/natural and undeveloped. In the case
of the subject parcel, while the General
Plan is open space the actual OS-3 district
on the parcel assumes that there would be
a limited amount of develop ment uses fo r
the property. Allowable uses within the
OS-3 zone include: parks and recreation
uses. Conditionally permitted u ses
include: fruit and vegetable stands tree
farming, and a horticulture garden. The
applicant is requesting a different OS
designation in order to allow self -storage
which they believe to be a low impact use
of the site.

8. Will the hours of operation be limited? Will
there be limitations of who can use/what can be
stored at the facility -as this could determine the
frequency of visits.

In response to concern these con cerns,
staff has required the applicant to submit a
request for a Conditional Use Permit.

Hours of operation are proposed for 7:00
a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday thro ugh
Sunday.

9. Security concerns as this is a self -storage
facility
Security fencing will be provided around
the perimeter of the facility. Said fencing
must be reviewed and approved prior to
City i ssuance of bu ilding or la ndscape
permits.

← All documents from this meeting