SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 REGULAR AGENDA
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL
6:00 PM REGULAR MEETING
City Hall Council Chambers
6360 Fountain Square Drive, Citrus Heights, CA
HOW TO PARTICIPATE:
The City of Citrus Heights welcomes your interest and involvement in the City’s legislative process.
The City of Citrus Heights is allowing for remote and in person participation. The City Council has established a procedure for addressing the Council. Speaker Identification Sheets are provided on the table inside the Council Chambers. If you wish to address the Council during the meeting, please either complete a Speaker Identification Sheet and give it to the City Clerk, if participating via webcast you may use the Zoom hand raise function (or *9 if you join the webinar via telephone) and the host will unmute you when it is time to speak. Speakers will be limited to 3 minutes each.
Alternatively, you may submit your comment via email to [email protected] or by completion of an online Speaker Card at https://www.citrusheights.net/FormCenter/City-CouncilMeetings-Speaker-Card-30. Written public comments shall be limited to 250 words or less. Each comment will be read aloud by the City Clerk.
Zoom Meeting –Webinar link: https://zoom.us/j/91080490257 PLEASE NOTE: In order to minimize the spread of the COVID-19 virus, this meeting is being held pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e). Please be advised that the some, or all, Council Members may attend City Council meetings telephonically or otherwise electronically.
If you need a disability-related modification or accommodation, to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office 916-725-2448, [email protected], or City Hall 6360 Fountain Square Drive at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. TDD: California Relay Service 7-1-1.
September 22, 2022 City Council Agenda Packet
SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET.PDF
5:15 PM – 6:00 PM Reception For Release Of The Book “Becoming The City Of Citrus Heights: The History Of A Unique Incorporation”
CALL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER
1. Flag Salute
2. Roll Call: Council Members: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
3. Video Statement
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Documents:
2. Roll Call: Council Members: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
3. Video Statement
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
PUBLIC COMMENT
PRESENTATIONS
4. Presentation Introducing The Book “Becoming The City Of Citrus Heights: The History Of A Unique Incorporation”
5. Presentation Of Proclamation Honoring The Kiwanis Club’s 50th Anniversary
6. Presentation Of Proclamation Recognizing September 2022 As Prostate Cancer Awareness Month
COMMENTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND REGIONAL BOARD UPDATES
CONSENT CALENDAR
It is recommended that all consent items be acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action are requested by a Council Member.
7. SUBJECT: Approval Of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special/Regular Meeting of August 11, 2022 and the Regular Meeting of August 25, 2022
8. SUBJECT: Approve Resolution For Continued Remote Meetings In Accordance With AB 361
STAFF: A. Van/ R. Jones
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-____ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, a Resolution Making the Legally Required Findings to Continue to Authorize the Conduct of Remote “Telephonic” Meetings During the State of Emergency
9. SUBJECT: Conflict Of Interest Code Biennial Update
STAFF: A. Van
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-____ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Adopting a Revised Conflict of Interest Code and a List of Designated Positions
10. SUBJECT: Resolution Approving A Cost Of Living Adjustment Plus A One Time Payment For Full Time Unrepresented Employees And Adopting An Amended Salary Table
STAFF: A. Feeney/ S. Talwar
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-___, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Approving Regular Unrepresented Employees a 3% Cost of Living Adjustment, A 3% One-Time Payment, and the Amended Salary Table, Exhibit A effective September 22, 2022
11. SUBJECT: Resolution To Update Plan Coordinator For Mission Square 457 Deferred Compensation Plan And 401a Money Purchase Plan
STAFF: S. Talwar/ R. Prasad/ T. Nossardi
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-____ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, To Modify Designated Plan
11. SUBJECT: Resolution To Update Plan Coordinator For Mission Square 457 Deferred Compensation Plan And 401a Money Purchase Plan
STAFF: S. Talwar/ R. Prasad/ T. Nossardi
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-____ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, To Modify Designated Plan Coordinator For Mission Square 457 Deferred Compensation Plan and 401a Money Purchase Plan
12. SUBJECT: Update Of Officers For Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) STAFF: S. Talwar/ R. Prasad/ T. Nossardi
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-____ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing the Investment of City Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund by Certain City Officers and Authorizing them to Order the Deposit or Withdrawal of Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund
REGULAR CALENDAR
13. SUBJECT: Potential Annexation Work Plan
STAFF: C. Kempenaar/ R. Jones
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council review the staff presentation and provide direction to staff if future action is desired
14. SUBJECT: Considerations And Options For Pavement Restoration Strategies STAFF: R. Cave/ L. Blomquist
RECOMMENDATION: Review the staff presentation and provide direction to staff to proceed with developing long term planning of citywide pavement restoration plans
15. SUBJECT: Guideline Approval And Funding Allocation For The Community Projects Grant Program
STAFF: M. Huber
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-____ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Approving the Community Projects Grant Program Guidelines and Associated American Rescue Plan Act Funding Allocation
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
CITY MANAGER ITEMS
ITEMS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL MEMBERS / FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
ADJOURNMENT
Printed on Recycled Paper
City Council meetings take place in
the City Hall Council Chambers.
Porsche Middleton, Mayor
Tim Schaefer, Vice Mayor
Jeannie Bruins, Council Member
Bret Daniels, Council Member
Steve Miller, Council Member
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting of Thursday, September 22, 2022
City Hall Council Chambers
6360 Fountain Square Drive, Citrus Heights, CA
Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m.
HOW TO PARTICIPATE:
The City of Citrus Heights welcomes your interest and involvement in the City’s legislative process. The City of Citrus Heights is allowing for remote and in person participation. The City Council has established a procedure for addressing the Council. Speaker Identification Sheets are provided on the table inside the Council Chambers. If you wish to address the Council during the meeting, please either complete a Speaker Identification Sheet and give it to the City Clerk, if participating via webcast you may use the Zoom hand raise function (or *9 if you join the webinar via telephone) and the host will unmute you when it is time to speak. Speakers will be limited to 3 minutes each. Alternatively, you may submit your comment via email to [email protected] or by completion of an online Speaker Card at https://www.citrusheights.net/FormCenter/City-Council-Meetings-Speaker-Card-30. Written public comments shall be limited to 250 words or less. Public Comments should be submitted to the City Clerk by 4:00 p.m. prior to the start of the City Council meeting. Each comment will be read aloud by the City Clerk.
Regular Meeting Zoom Webinar link: https://zoom.us/j/91080490257 The City provides three ways to watch a City Council meeting.
IN PERSON ONLINE ON TELEVISION
PLEASE NOTE: In order to minimize the spread of the COVID-19 virus, this meeting is being held pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e). Please be advised that some, or all, Council Members may attend City Council meetings telephonically or otherwise electronically.
If you need a disability-related modification or accommodation, to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office 916-725-2448, [email protected], or City Hall 6360 Fountain Square Drive at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. TDD: California Relay Service 7-1-1.
September 16, 2022
_______________________
Amy Van, City Clerk
Watch the livestream and replay past
meetings on the City website.
Watch live and replays of meetings
on Sac Metro Cable, Channel 14.
Agenda Packet Page 1
Citrus Heights City Council Thursday, September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
CALL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER
1. Flag Salute
2. Roll Call: Council Members: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
3. Video Statement
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
PUBLIC COMMENT
PRESENTATION
4. Presentation introducing the book “Becoming the City of Citrus Heights: The History of a Unique Incorporation”
5. Presentation of Proclamation Honoring the Kiwanis Club’s 50th Anniversary
6. Presentation of Proclamation Recognizing September 2022 as Prostate Cancer Awareness Month
COMMENTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND REGIONAL BOARD UPDATES
CONSENT CALENDAR
It is recommended that all consent items be acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action are requested by a Council Member.
7. SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special/Regular Meeting of August 11, 2022 and the Regular Meeting of August 25, 2022
8. SUBJECT: Approve Resolution for Continued Remote Meetings in Accordance with AB 361 STAFF: A. Van/ R. Jones
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-____ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, a Resolution Making the Legally Required Findings to Continue to Authorize the Conduct of Remote “Telephonic” Meetings During the State of Emergency
5:15 PM – 6:00 PM
Reception for release of the book “Becoming the City of Citrus Heights: The History of a Unique Incorporation”
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
6:00 PM
Agenda Packet Page 2
Citrus Heights City Council Thursday, September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
9. SUBJECT: Conflict of Interest Code Biennial Update
STAFF: A. Van
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-____ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Adopting a Revised Conflict of Interest Code and a List of Designated Positions
10. SUBJECT: Resolution Approving a Cost of Living Adjustment Plus a One Time Payment for Full Time Unrepresented Employees and Adopting an Amended Salary Table STAFF: A. Feeney/ S. Talwar
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-___, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Approving Regular Unrepresented Employees a 3% Cost of Living Adjustment, A 3% One-Time Payment, and the Amended Salary Table, Exhibit A effective September 22, 2022
11. SUBJECT: Resolution to Update Plan Coordinator for Mission Square 457 Deferred Compensation Plan and 401a Money Purchase Plan
STAFF: S. Talwar/ R. Prasad/ T. Nossardi
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-____ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, To Modify Designated Plan Coordinator For Mission Square 457 Deferred Compensation Plan and 401a Money Purchase Plan
12. SUBJECT: Update of Officers for Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) STAFF: S. Talwar/ R. Prasad/ T. Nossardi
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-____ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing the Investment of City Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund by Certain City Officers and Authorizing them to Order the Deposit or Withdrawal of Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund
REGULAR CALENDAR
13. SUBJECT: Potential Annexation Work Plan
STAFF: C. Kempenaar/ R. Jones
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council review the staff presentation and provide direction to staff if future action is desired.
14. SUBJECT: Considerations and Options for Pavement Restoration Strategies STAFF: R. Cave/ L. Blomquist
RECOMMENDATION: Review the staff presentation and provide direction to staff to proceed with developing long term planning of citywide pavement restoration plans
15. SUBJECT: Guideline Approval and Funding Allocation for the Community Projects Grant Program
STAFF: M. Huber
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-____ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Approving the Community Projects Grant Program Guidelines and Associated American Rescue Plan Act Funding Allocation Agenda Packet Page 3
Citrus Heights City Council Thursday, September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
CITY MANAGER ITEMS
ITEMS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL MEMBERS/ FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
ADJOURNMENT
Agenda Packet Page 4
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
Special/ Regular Meeting of Thursday, August 11, 2022
City Hall Council Chambers and Virtually
6360 Fountain Square Drive
Citrus Heights, CA 95621
CALL SPECIAL MEETING TO ORDER
1. Roll Call: Council Members: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
PUBLIC COMMENT
CLOSED SESSION
2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: 7501 Sunrise Boulevard, Citrus Heights, CA 95610 Agency Negotiator: City Manager Ashley J. Feeney and City Attorney Ryan Jones Negotiating Parties: Auburn Oaks Center, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, and The Low Income Family Enrichment Corporation, a California Public Benefit Corporation and 501(c)(3) Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment
REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Jones reported out of closed session. Per the Council’s direction, City Manager Feeney will negotiate a non-binding letter of intent for the property located at 7501 Sunrise Blvd. Any action will be acted upon at a regular City Council meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Middleton adjourned the special meeting at 5:45 p.m.
CALL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER
The regular council meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Middleton.
1. The Flag Salute was led by Council Member Daniels.
2. Roll Call: Council Members present: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton Council Members absent: None
Staff present: Blomquist, Cave, Feeney, Jones, Kempenaar, Myers, Saario, Singer, Talwar, Turcotte, and Van.
3. The video statement was read by City Clerk Van.
Item 7 Agenda Packet Page 5
Citrus Heights City Council Minutes Thursday, August 11, 2022
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Daniels, seconded by Council Member Miller, the City Council approved the agenda.
AYES: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
COMMENTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND REGIONAL BOARD UPDATES
Council Member Daniels shared an update from National Night Out.
Council Member Bruins provided an update from National Night Out, which took place on August 2. She also shared updates from the Police Activities League (PAL) board meeting. Council Member Bruins shared information on an upcoming PAL event on August 20 at Lake Natoma.
Council Member Miller provided an update from the Sacramento Regional Transit board meeting. He also shared an update from the Sacramento Transportation Authority board meeting.
Vice Mayor Schaefer attended the National Night Out event and shared his appreciation for the Neighborhood Associations.
Mayor Middleton recently attended the Citrus Heights Chamber of Commerce Elected Officials event.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Janet Newton addressed the Council regarding Republic Services contract. She expressed her concern for the rate increase due to SB 1383.
Christina, Veronica, and Andrea addressed the Council regarding a tiny home community. They addressed the affordable housing crisis faced by many Californian residents today and stated their support for an enhanced tiny home community. They work with cities to share information on how to help tiny home initiatives to assist the community facing a housing crisis. They are interested in helping the city amend ordinances and make tiny homes available for residents who are interested.
PRESENTATION
4. Update on the Sunday Funday Event to be held on September 25, 2022 Event Technician Michele Saario and Facilities Manager Chris Myers presented an update on the upcoming Sunday Funday event. This year’s event will celebrate the City’s 25th anniversary with elevated attractions and entertainment. The City has collaborated with the Sunrise Recreation and Park District, and the Citrus Heights Chamber of Commerce for this year’s evet. Sunday Funday is a free event with food trucks, inflatables children’s activities, and more.
Agenda Packet Page 6
Citrus Heights City Council Minutes Thursday, August 11, 2022
CONSENT CALENDAR
5. SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 28, 2022
6. SUBJECT: Approve Resolution for Continued Remote Meetings in Accordance with AB 361 STAFF: A. Van/ R. Jones
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-082, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California Making the Legally Required Findings to Continue to Authorize the Conduct of Remote “Telephonic” Meetings During the State of Emergency
7. SUBJECT: Quarterly Treasurer’s Report
STAFF: T. Nossardi
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File the Quarterly Treasurer’s Report for the Quarter Ending June 30, 2022
8. ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUSSION
9. SUBJECT: Mariposa Avenue Safe Routes to School Phase 4 – ATPSB1L-5475(043) Approval of Contract Amendment No. 2 – Construction Management, Inspection and Materials Testing Services
STAFF: R. Cave/ L. Blomquist
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-084, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement for Professional Services with Coastland Civil Engineering, Inc. for the Mariposa Avenue Safe Routes to School Phase 4 Project
10. SUBJECT: Park Facilities Impact Fee Request Expansion of the C-Bar-C Park Playground STAFF: R. Cave/ L. Blomquist
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-085, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing and Approving the use of Park Facilities Impact Fee Funds in the Amount not to Exceed $150,000 for Expansion of the C-Bar-C Park Playground Vice Mayor Schaefer requested to pull item 8 for discussion.
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Daniels, seconded by Council Member Miller, the City Council adopted Consent Calendar Items 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10.
AYES: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUSSION
8. SUBJECT: Participation in Regional Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Building Electrification Efforts
Agenda Packet Page 7
Citrus Heights City Council Minutes Thursday, August 11, 2022
STAFF: C. Kempenaar/ E. Singer
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-083, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California Authorizing the City Manager to Participate as an Additional Agency by Executing the Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Sacramento, County of Sacramento, and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District Regarding Coordination and Cooperation on Building Electrification Efforts
Associate Planner Singer introduced the item. He stated in 2022 the city of Sacramento, Sacramento County, and SMUD created a regional Memorandum of Understanding for building electrification efforts.
Following the creation of the MOU, an invitation was sent to all Sacramento County agencies for participation. The MOU sets the framework for how participating agencies coordinate building electrification efforts, including new and retrofit construction. This MOU would increase information sharing, reduce duplicative processes, provide shared learning resources, increase community input, and add a competitive advantage for grant funding. Participation in the MOU by the City of Citrus Heights would not create an ordinance or regulations, nor does it tie the City to any other jurisdiction’s actions.
Council comments and discussion followed.
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Bruins, seconded by Vice Mayor Schaefer, the City Council would not participate as an Additional Agency in the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Sacramento, County of Sacramento, and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District regarding coordination and cooperation on building electrification efforts.
AYES: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC HEARING
11. SUBJECT: Zoning Code Updates
STAFF: C. Kempenaar/ E. Singer
RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends the Following:
a. Move to Determine the Proposed Amendments are Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Under Section 15061(B)(3) of the Guidelines; and b. Move to Introduce for First Reading, Read by Title Only and Waive the Full Reading of Ordinance No. 2022- 007, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights Amending Section 106.32 (Affordable Housing Incentives) of Chapter 106 of the Citrus Heights Municipal Code (Zoning Code Section)
Associate Planner Singer introduced the item. Singer stated that the Zoning Code is being updated to comply with the California Density Bonus Law. The changes include limits on impact fees, longer affordability period, incentives & concessions, sales of affordable units to non-profits, and no required pro formas. The Density Bonus Law allows projects who guarantee a set percentage of units for affordable housing to add more units than typically allowed. These updated to the Zoning Code will not waive requests for concession based on adverse impact to the environment and include reduced parking requirements.
Agenda Packet Page 8
Citrus Heights City Council Minutes Thursday, August 11, 2022
Mayor Middleton opened the public hearing at 6:35 p.m., hearing no public comment she closed the hearing.
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Bruins, seconded by Council Member Miller, the City Council Moved to Determine the Proposed Amendments are Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Under Section 15061(B)(3) of the Guidelines
AYES: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Bruins, seconded by Council Member Miller, the City Council Moved to Introduce for First Reading, Read by Title Only and Waive the Full Reading of Ordinance No. 2022- 007, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights Amending Section 106.32 (Affordable Housing Incentives) of Chapter 106 of the Citrus Heights Municipal Code (Zoning Code Section).
AYES: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
12. SUBJECT: Abandonment of Setback in Larchmont Rosewood Subdivision STAFF: C. Kempenaar/ E. Singer
RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends the Following:
a. Move to Determine the Proposed Amendments are Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Under Section 15061(B)(3) of the Guidelines; and b. Move to Introduce for First Reading, Read by Title Only and Waive the Full Reading of Ordinance No. 2022-008, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, Approving Abandonment of An Existing 25-Foot Setback on Thirty Parcels Located Within the Larchmont Rosewood Subdivision (APN 209-0690-003, -004, -050, -051, -065, -066, 209- 0700-005 Through -016, -029, -030, 209-0710-011, -012, -018, -019, -021 Through -026) Associate Planner Singer introduced the item. The proposed abandonment of a 25-foot setback affects thirty properties in the Larchmont Rosewood subdivision, which was recorded in 1983. The abandonment would allow property owners to fully use the setback area on their properties. The 25-foot setback is believed to have been a safety setback in 1983. Since recorded, the subdivision has seen further development. A recorded final map may be amended if the local agency finds changed circumstances make any or all map conditions are no longer appropriate. The modifications proposed to the recorded map do not impose an additional burden on the existing fee owner, nor will the modification alter any right, title or interest in the property recorded.
Mayor Middleton opened the public hearing at 6:39 p.m., hearing no public comment she closed the hearing.
Agenda Packet Page 9
Citrus Heights City Council Minutes Thursday, August 11, 2022
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Miller, seconded by Council Member Bruins, the City Council Moved to Determine the Proposed Amendments are Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Under Section 15061(B)(3) of the Guidelines.
AYES: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Miller, seconded by Council Member Bruins, the City Council Move to Introduce for First Reading, Read by Title Only and Waive the Full Reading of Ordinance No. 2022-008, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, Approving Abandonment of An Existing 25-Foot Setback on Thirty Parcels Located Within the Larchmont Rosewood Subdivision (APN 209-0690-003, -004, -050, -051, -065, -066, 209-0700-005 Through -016, -029, -030, 209-0710-011, -012, - 018, -019, -021 Through -026).
AYES: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
REGULAR CALENDAR
13. SUBJECT: Arcade Cripple Creek Trail Project (Formerly known as the Electric Greenway Trail Project)
STAFF: R. Cave/ C. Kempenaar/ L. Blomquist
RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends the Following:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-086 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Approving the Use of Park Facilities Impact Fees in an Amount Not to Exceed $75,000 for the Arcade-Cripple Creek Trail Project
b. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-087 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Approving a Loan from the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) to Provide Gap Funding for Construction of the Arcade-Cripple Creek Trail Project c. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-088 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. for the Arcade-Cripple Creek Trail Project d. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-090 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Coastland Civil Engineering Services, Inc. to Provide Construction Management, Inspection, and Materials Testing Services for the Arcade Cripple Creek Trail Project e. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-091 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 7 to the Contract for Professional Services with GHD, Inc. for Construction Support for the Arcade-Cripple Creek Trail Project
Agenda Packet Page 10
Citrus Heights City Council Minutes Thursday, August 11, 2022
f. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-092 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with the Sacramento Tree Foundation to Provide Professional Services for Tree Planting, Monitoring and Outreach Services
Council Member Bruins recused herself from the item due to her homes proximity to the Arcade Cripple Creek project. Her home is within 500 feet of the project, which poses a conflict of interest.
Community Development Director Kempenaar and City Engineer Blomquist introduced the item.
Kempenaar discussed the trail boundaries and the regional importance of this project. Sacramento County reserved land for trail purposes prior to incorporation. The General Plan set in 2000 established a system of Creekside trails, passive open space, and parks for public use. In 2011, the updated General Plan adopted a complete streets policy, and directed the update of the bike master plan and the pedestrian master plan.
Blomquist discussed the active transportation program, which is a grant program managed by Caltrans and provides funding for projects that increase biking, walking, and alternative transportation. The grant program received over 450 applications in 2016, where the City was allocated $6.2 million. The City received grant funding for the establishment of a 2.9-mile multi-use trail that connects eight parks, the Sunrise MarketPlace, Woodside k-8 school, and more. This trail allows the City to collaborate with the San Juan Unified School District, Sunrise Recreation and Park District, Orangevale Recreation and Park District, Sacramento County, and SMUD.
Since 2016, staff have conducted robust outreach efforts for the trail project. Kempenaar discussed how staff have worked to address community concerns such as tree removal. Staff have worked with SMUD and the Tree Foundation to identify tree mitigation and trail safety. Blomquist stated construction proposals are higher than initially estimated for a variety of reasons. As a result, staff have proposed utilization of park impact fees and a $2 million zero interest Sacramento Area Council of Government loan.
Council Member Daniels requested to not use the general fund for repayment of the SACOG loan.
Mayor Middleton asked what the financial costs to the City would be if decided to not go forward. Blomquist stated the City would have to give back the grant award and repay any funding already spent.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Kathy Morris addressed the Council stating her support for the trail project. She believes that a clean trail is safe for residents and increases visibility. She shared her appreciation for the open communication from staff and council.
Dave Mitchell, District Administrator with Sunrise Recreation and Park District stated their support of the trail. The trail would go through seven SRPD parks. The trail system would meet a demand already placed on the park system.
Agenda Packet Page 11
Citrus Heights City Council Minutes Thursday, August 11, 2022
John Barth stated he was initially concerned with the increased activity on the trail and it being so close to his home. Despite his concerns, he is now in favor of the trail and the positive contributions it has had on his neighbors.
Chris Dougherty with the Sacramento Area Council of Governments addressed the Council regarding his support of this project. He stated this project would positively increase connectivity throughout the region.
Toni Snider addressed the Council regarding her safety concerns. She stated she is concerned for bicyclist navigating the dark streets and requests lighting and police presence.
Mike Teran addressed the Council regarding the trail project. He address raising the bridge along the trail, and questioned if it needed to be done. He also expressed his concerns for the safety along the trail.
David Oberg addressed the Council regarding the stop signs along the trail project. He stated the need for stop signs that flash and light when pedestrians are crossing. Additionally, he stated his concern for jaywalkers and those who would ignore a cross walk.
Gloria Turner addressed the Council regarding the increased traffic and pedestrian impact on her street.
She stated her concern for the safety of the pedestrians and roads along the trail in Orangevale. She also addressed her concern for increased loitering in the area.
Lisa Montes with the Orangevale Recreation and Park District addressed the Council stating her support for the trail. She is excited to connect parks, trails, and residents with Citrus Heights. She stated her goal is to always keep her community safe and to increase connectivity in recreation.
Dennis Turner addressed the Council commending city staff for the increased public engagement. He stated he does have concerns on the bridge and safety.
Neil Anderson addressed the Council regarding his concern of the existing bridge in Sundance Park. He does not believe a new bridge needs to be constructed and the existing bridge should suffice for the project.
Tom DiGiacomo addressed the Council regarding the trail project. He addressed four main concerns including lighting on Highwood and Woodmore Oaks Drive, blinking stop signs, raising of the existing pedestrian bridge, and the entrance to Sundance Park.
David Huber, board chair for the Sunrise Recreation and Park District, addressed the Council regarding his support for the proposed trail project.
Veronica Hunter addressed the Council regarding her support and excitement of the trail project.
Andrea Montano addressed the Council regarding her support for increased accessibility in the community.
She stated her appreciation in the environmental and safety measures taken for the project.
Peg Pinard addressed the Council stating her concerns for the trails impact on neighborhoods. She stated that the most destructive options have been taken.
Agenda Packet Page 12
Citrus Heights City Council Minutes Thursday, August 11, 2022
Daniel Kehrer addressed the Council regarding his support for the project. As the consultant and engineer on the project, he stated all comments and feedback have been taken into consideration during the development process.
Council comments and questions followed.
ACTION: On a motion by Vice Mayor Schaefer, seconded by Council Member Daniels, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-086 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Approving the Use of Park Facilities Impact Fees in an Amount Not to Exceed $75,000 for the ArcadeCripple Creek Trail Project.
AYES: Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Bruins (recused)
ACTION: On a motion by Vice Mayer Schaefer, seconded by Council Member Daniels, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-087 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Approving a Loan from the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) to Provide Gap Funding for Construction of the Arcade-Cripple Creek Trail Project.
AYES: Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Bruins (recused)
ACTION: On a motion by Vice Mayor Schaefer, seconded by Council Member Daniels, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-088 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. for the Arcade-Cripple Creek Trail Project.
AYES: Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Bruins (recused)
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Miller, seconded by Council Member Daniels, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-090 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Coastland Civil Engineering Services, Inc. to Provide Construction Management, Inspection, and Materials Testing Services for the Arcade Cripple Creek Trail Project.
AYES: Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Bruins (recused)
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Miller, seconded by Council Member Daniels, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-091 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Amendment No. 7 to the Contract for Professional Services with GHD, Inc. for Construction Support for the Arcade-Cripple Creek Trail Project.
Agenda Packet Page 13
Citrus Heights City Council Minutes Thursday, August 11, 2022
AYES: Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Bruins (recused)
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Miller, seconded by Council Member Daniels, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-092 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with the Sacramento Tree Foundation to Provide Professional Services for Tree Planting, Monitoring and Outreach Services.
AYES: Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Bruins (recused)
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
None
CITY MANAGER ITEMS
None
ITEMS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL MEMBERS/ FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS None
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Middleton adjourned the regular meeting at 8:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________
Amy Van, City Clerk
Agenda Packet Page 14
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
Regular Meeting of Thursday, August 25, 2022
City Hall Council Chambers and Virtually
6360 Fountain Square Drive
Citrus Heights, CA 95621
CALL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER
The regular council meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Middleton.
1. The Flag Salute was led by Council Member Miller.
2. Roll Call: Council Members present: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton Council Members absent: None
Staff present: Blomquist, Cave, Feeney, Huber, Jones, Kempenaar, Myers, Reid, Singer, Talwar, Turcotte, and Van.
3. The video statement was read by City Clerk Van.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Daniels, seconded by Council Member Miller, the City Council approved the agenda.
AYES: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC COMMENT
Lisa Strange, with the California Department of Insurance, addressed the Council. She shared information on two programs Citrus Heights residents could be eligible for. One program is the California Low cost auto insurance program, which is a state sponsored program to offer affordable insurance to those who meet set requirements. The second is the Senior Gateway website, which is a one-stop for seniors and their caregivers to find all resources in one location. The website is seniors.ca.gov.
Thomas Spencer addressed the Council regarding his desire to name the open space along Greenback Lane. The open space is home to the City’s public art piece, “Up & Away”, but the area does not have a designated name.
Michael Lagomarsino addressed the Council regarding the upcoming election. As the former president of the REACH board and active member of the Neighborhood Association, he wanted to remind these organizations that they cannot endorse candidates for the election. Individuals can endorse a particular candidate, but they cannot endorse as an organization.
Agenda Packet Page 15
Citrus Heights City Council Minutes Thursday, August 25, 2022
PRESENTATION
4. Presentation by Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) - 2024 Blueprint, the Big Picture: Long Range Regional Planning
Operations Manager Poole introduced James Corless with the Sacramento Area Council of Governments.
Corless gave a presentation on the SACOG Blueprint for Long Range Regional Planning. This regional planning document takes into account the growth seen at a local level and outlines how municipalities can accommodate the increased demand. SACOG expects the growth rate will slow down, but the overall impact will require infrastructure improvements. The three main areas of focus are equity, economy, and environmental sustainability. SACOG is largely known for focusing on transportation, housing, and economic development. Corless discussed how the region will need to get creative when it comes to rethinking transportation and regional needs. As SACOG begins putting together this regional planning document, they intend to conduct extensive outreach and education to understand resident priorities.
Initiatives include the Green Means Go, Ready, Set, Trails, and other programming.
COMMENTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND REGIONAL BOARD UPDATES
Council Member Daniels shared an update from the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District board meeting.
Council Member Bruins provided an update from Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District board meeting. She also shared information for a viewing and reception honoring the late Jim Cook.
Council Member Miller provided an update from the Sacramento Regional Transit board meeting. He also shared information regarding free rides on Regional Transit for all students.
Vice Mayor Schaefer attended meetings for Neighborhood Area 5 and 10.
Mayor Middleton had no updates at this time.
CONSENT CALENDAR
5. SUBJECT: Second Reading – Zoning Code Updates
STAFF: C. Kempenaar / E. Singer
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-007, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights Amending Section 106.32 (Affordable Housing Incentives) of Chapter 106 of the Citrus Heights Municipal Code (Zoning Code Section)
6. SUBJECT: Second Reading – Abandonment of Setback in Larchmont Rosewood Subdivision STAFF: C. Kempenaar / E. Singer
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-008, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights Approving Abandonment of an Existing 25-Foot Setback on Thirty Parcels Located within the Larchmont Rosewood Subdivision (APN 209-0690-003, -004, -050, -051, -065, - 066, 209-0700-005 Through -016, -029, -030, 209-0710-011, -012, -018, -019, -021 Through -026) Agenda Packet Page 16
Citrus Heights City Council Minutes Thursday, August 25, 2022
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Bruins, seconded by Vice Mayor Schaefer, the City Council adopted Consent Calendar Items 5 and 6.
AYES: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
REGULAR CALENDAR
7. SUBJECT: Designation of Voting Delegate and Alternate(s) for the League of California Cities Annual Conference
STAFF: A. Van / H. Reid
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council designate a voting delegate and alternate(s) to participate at the Annual Business Meeting on September 9, 2022 during the League of California Cities Annual Conference.
Management Analyst Reid introduced the item. She stated the League of California Cities Conference will take place September 7-9, 2022 in Long Beach. During the League of California Cities Business meeting on September 8, voting delegates will adopt the proposed amendments to the League by-laws. The voting delegate must be registered to attend the conference. The only Council Member registered to attend is Mayor Middleton.
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Bruins, seconded by Council Member Miller, the City Council Delegated Mayor Middleton to serve as the Voting Delegate at the Annual Business Meeting on September 9, 2022 during the League of California Cities Annual Conference.
AYES: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
8. SUBJECT: Community Block Party Trailer Program Approval STAFF: M. Huber/ C. Myers
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the Citrus Heights Community Block Party Trailer Program.
Economic Development and Community Engagement Director Huber introduced the item for the Community Block Party Trailer. Huber discussed the strategic planning retreat goal of enhanced community vibrancy and engagement. At the May 10 strategic planning retreat, Council set a goal to purchase and outfit a Community Block Party Trailer for community groups to rent, which is stocked with essentials to host events. Council previously allocated $50,000 to implement the project.
Facilities Manager Myers stated the trailer has been purchased and will be completely outfitted with essentials for community events.
Huber mentioned that this block party trailer is be available for Citrus Heights Neighborhood Association groups, community organizations, and similar groups who are registered with the Community Engagement department. Individual residents and businesses are not eligible to reserve the block party trailer for private Agenda Packet Page 17
Citrus Heights City Council Minutes Thursday, August 25, 2022
events. Reservations for the trailer are based on a first come first serve basis. No reservations are accepted sooner than six months in advance. Program implementation will launch in winter 2022.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Michael Lagomarsino addressed the Council regarding his support for the Block Party Trailer Program.
Council comments and feedback followed.
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Bruins, seconded by Vice Mayor Schaefer, the City Council approved the Citrus Heights Community Block Party Trailer Program.
AYES: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
9. SUBJECT: Approval of Memorandum of Understanding with the Life Foundation related to the Auburn Oaks Facility at 7501 Sunrise Boulevard
STAFF: A. Feeney / R. Jones
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-092, A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing The City To Enter Into A Memorandum Of Understanding With The Life Foundation Related To The Auburn Oaks Affordable Senior Housing Project Located At 7501 Sunrise Boulevard
City Manager Feeney introduced the item before Council. At the August 11 City Council closed session, Council directed the City Manager to execute a non-binding letter of intent with the Life Foundation. The Life Foundation initially reached out to staff regarding an opportunity to pursue a collaborative grant application for the purchase of the Auburn Oaks Senior Apartments. The Life Foundation intends to keep the Senior Apartment complex as a low-income facility. The goal of the Life Foundation is to ensure the property remains in service to the local low-income senior population.
City Attorney Jones discussed the Memorandum of Understanding that was created from the non-binding Letter of Intent. He highlighted the City’s partnership with the Life Foundation is to pursue Community Care Expansion Program grant funding from the state. The Life Foundation would own and be responsible for the operation and management of the senior housing project. Additionally, the City has review and approval rights for changes in management companies that will operate the facility. The City will not contribute any funding for this project.
Council comments and discussion followed.
ACTION: On a motion by Council Member Daniels, seconded by Vice Mayor Schaefer, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-092, authorizing the City to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with The Life Foundation related to the Auburn Oaks Affordable Senior Housing Project Located At 7501 Sunrise Boulevard.
AYES: Bruins, Daniels, Miller, Schaefer, Middleton
NOES: None
Agenda Packet Page 18
Citrus Heights City Council Minutes Thursday, August 25, 2022
ABSENT: None
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
None
CITY MANAGER ITEMS
City Manager Feeney informed Council that the September 8 City Council meeting has been cancelled due to the League of California Cities Conference. He also shared the City was recognized by the Sacramento Chapter of the American Public Works Association for successful delivery of the Mariposa Safe Routes to School Project. Lastly, he informed the Council that the Citrus Heights Police Department had two recruits graduate from the Police Academy and receive their badges.
ITEMS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL MEMBERS/ FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Vice Mayor Schaefer requested a future item to name the open space on Greenback Lane, Council Member Daniels and Mayor Middleton supported this item. Council Member Bruins requested the Economic Development and Community Engagement Director oversee a process to name the open space.
CLOSED SESSION
10. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section § 54956.9(d)(4) 1 case
11. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
Agency designated representatives: Ashley Feeney, City Manager Employee organizations: Unrepresented Employees (All)
REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
There was no reportable action from closed session.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Middleton adjourned the regular meeting at 8:12 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________
Amy Van, City Clerk
Agenda Packet Page 19
Printed on Recycled Paper
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 22, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Amy Van, City Clerk
Ryan Jones, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Approve Resolution for Continued Remote Meetings in Accordance with AB 361
Summary and Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-___ a resolution making the legally required findings to continue to authorize the conduct of remote “telephonic” meetings during the State of Emergency.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
Background and Analysis
At the October 14, 2021 regular meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-082 making the legally required findings to authorize the conduct of remote “telephonic” meetings during a declared state of emergency pursuant to Government Code. The City Council determined that as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and state of emergency, meetings in person of the City Council and all legislative bodies of the City would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.
In the event of an ongoing proclaimed state of emergency, in order to continue to conduct meetings remotely, any time after the first remote meeting of the legislative body, it can meet remotely if both of the following apply:
1. State/local emergency/social distancing. Either:
a. “a state of emergency remains active” or
b. “state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing” and
Item 8 Agenda Packet Page 20
Subject: Approve Resolution for Continued Remote Meetings in Accordance with AB 361 Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
2. 30 days. Within the last 30 days (which vote may occur at that meeting) the legislative body has made the following findings by majority vote “(A) The legislative body has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency. (B) Any of the following circumstances exist (i) The state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person. (ii) State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing.”
Governor Newsom’s March 4, 2020 Proclamation of Emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic is still in effect. It is important to note that neither AB 361 nor the attached resolution would require meetings be held in an all-virtual format. By adopting this resolution would allow a “hybrid” format where council members and staff participate either in person or remotely depending on their individual circumstances. Additionally, the hybrid formal allows the public to continue to participate remotely. Failing to adopt this resolution would require meetings to be held in-person under traditional Brown Act parameters (noticing the teleconference location, providing access to the public, etc.); adopting the resolution would give the flexibility as it moves forward with meetings.
If the City intends to conduct meetings remotely, it should add to every agenda a consent calendar item to reaffirm the findings described above, which are required to allow the remote meetings. This resolution also makes the necessary finings for all subordinate legislative bodies of the City, such as the Planning Commission, so these bodies can also continue to meet remotely on an ongoing basis.
Attachments
1. Resolution to Continue to Authorize the Conduct of Remote “Telephonic” Meetings During the State of Emergency
Agenda Packet Page 21
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS
HEIGHTS MAKING THE LEGALLY REQUIRED FINDINGS TO
CONTINUE TO AUTHORIZE THE CONDUCT OF REMOTE
“TELEPHONIC” MEETINGS DURING THE STATE OF EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, pursuant to California Gov. Code Section 8625, the Governor declared a state of emergency stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic (“Emergency”); and
WHEREAS, on September 17, 2021, Governor Newsom signed AB 361, which bill went into immediate effect as urgency legislation; and
WHEREAS, AB 361 added subsection (e) to Government Code Section 54953 to authorize legislative bodies to conduct remote meetings provided the legislative body makes specified findings; and
WHEREAS, as of September 19, 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic has killed more than 67,612 Californians; and
WHEREAS, social distancing measures decrease the chance of spread of COVID-19; and WHEREAS, this legislative body previously adopted a resolution to authorize this legislative body and all other subordinate legislative bodies of the City to conduct remote “telephonic” meetings; and
WHEREAS, Government Code 54953(e)(3) authorizes legislative bodies of the City to continue to conduct remote “telephonic” meetings provided that the City has timely made the findings specified therein.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights as follows:
1. This legislative body declares that it has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency declared by the Governor and at least one of the following is true: (a) the state of emergency, continues to directly impact the ability of the members of this legislative body and all subordinate legislative bodies of the City to meet safely in person; and/or (2) state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing.
Agenda Packet Page 22
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of September, 2022 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members:
NOES: Council Members:
ABSENT: Council Members:
ABSTAIN: Council Members:
Porsche Middleton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Van, City Clerk
Agenda Packet Page 23
Printed on Recycled Paper
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 22, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Amy Van, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Conflict of Interest Code Biennial Update
Summary and Recommendation
The Political Reform Act requires every local government agency to review its conflict of interest code biennially to determine if it is accurate or if the code must be amended. A conflict of interest code tells public officials, governmental employees, and consultants what financial interests they must disclose on their Statement of Economic Interests (Form 700). Staff has determined amendments to the city’s Conflict of Interest Code are necessary.
Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-___ Adopting a revised Conflict of Interest Code and a list of designated positions.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
Background and Analysis
The Political Reform Act (the “Act”), Government Code Sections 81000, et seq., requires every state and local government agency to adopt a conflict of interest code. The Act also requires the City Council to review the provisions of the city’s code biennially to determine if revisions are required to update the code. The City Council last updated the code in October 2020, and since that time, certain positions have been removed, added, or changed. Therefore, the Appendix of Designated Positions needs to be updated.
The Appendix lists those positions within the city involved in making, or participation in making, a governmental decision that may affect the financial interest of the employee. The existing code includes four disclosure categories (full disclosure, limited disclosure – purchasing, limited disclosure – real property, and limited disclosure – regulatory).
Item 9 Agenda Packet Page 24
Subject: Conflict of Interest Code Biennial Update
Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
Members of the City Council, the City Manager, the City Attorney, the Finance Director, and the Planning Commission submit their statements of economic interest electronically with the Fair Political Practices Commission, and a copy is maintained by the City Clerk, therefore they are not subject to the city’s Conflict of Interest Code.
Attachments
1. Resolution No. 2022-___ Adopting a Revised Conflict of Interest Code and a List of Designated Positions.
a. Redlined Appendix of Designated Positions
Agenda Packet Page 25
RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS
HEIGHTS ADOPTING A REVISED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
AND A LIST OF DESIGNATED POSITIONS
WHEREAS, the Political Reform Act, Government Code Sections 81000, et seq., requires every state or local government agency to adopt and promulgate a conflict of interest code;
WHEREAS, the Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation, 2 Cal.
Code of Regulations Section 18730, which contains the terms of a standard model conflict of interest code, which can be incorporated by reference, and which will be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission to conform to any amendments in the Political Reform Act after public notice and hearing pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act, Government Code Sections 11370, et seq.;
WHEREAS, incorporation by reference of the terms of the aforementioned regulation and amendments to it as the conflict of interest code of the City of Citrus Heights (the “City”) will save the City time and money by minimizing the actions required of the City to keep its conflict of interest code in conformity with the Political Reform Act; and WHEREAS, the Political Reform Act requires every local government agency to review its conflict of interest code biennially to determine if it is accurate or needs to be amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. The terms of 2 Cal. Code of Regulations Section 18730, and any amendments to that section which may be duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission, is hereby adopted by reference as the body of the Conflict of Interest Code of the City of Citrus Heights.
2. The list of designated positions and disclosure categories attached hereto as Appendix “A” is hereby adopted as the Appendix of Designated Positions and Disclosure Categories referred to in 2 Cal. Code of Regulations Section 18730.
3. All persons holding designated positions shall file statements of economic interests with the City Clerk of the City of Citrus Heights, who shall be the filing officer with respect to these statements. The statements will be made available for public inspection and reproduction. Statements for all designated positions will be retained by the City of Citrus Heights.
4. This amended conflict of interest code is effective immediately and newly added designees are required to file within 30 days of the effective date of the Code.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California this 22nd day of September 2022, by the following vote, to wit:
Agenda Packet Page 26
AYES: Council Members:
NOES: Council Members:
ABSENT: Council Members:
ABSTAIN: Council Members:
Porsche Middleton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Van, City Clerk
Agenda Packet Page 27
APPENDIX “A”
APPENDIX OF DESIGNATED POSITIONS AND DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES I. Designated Positions.
Position Disclosure
Category
Accountant 1
Accounting Manager 1
Administrative Services Director 1
Assistant City Attorney 1
Assistant Chief of Police 1
Assistant City Clerk 1
Assistant City Manager 1
Assistant Engineer 3, 4
Assistant to the City Manager 1
Associate Civil Engineer 1
Associate Engineer 1
Associate Planner 1
Building Inspector I/II 3
Chief Building Official 1
Chief of Police 1
City Clerk 1
City Engineer 1
City Manager’s Executive Assistant 2
Communications Officer 1
Community Development Director 1
Community Services Director 1
Construction/Maintenance Inspector I/II 3
Construction/Maintenance Inspector Supervisor 1
Database and Applications Analyst 2
Development Specialist I/II 1
Economic Development & Communications Manager 1
Economic Development & Community Engagement Director 1
Facility and Grounds Manager 1
Finance Manager 1
General Services Director 1
Grants and Housing Program Technician I/II 3
Housing & Human Services Program Coordinator 1
Human Resources Analyst I/II 1
Human Resources Manager 1
Information Technology Analyst II 2
Information Technology Manager 1
Management Analyst I/II 1
Operations Manager 1
Planning Manager 1
Police Commander 1
Police Communications Supervisor 4
Police Lieutenant 2, 4
Police Services Manager 1
Police Services Supervisor 4
Principal Accountant-Auditor 1
Principal Civil Engineer 1
Principal Information Technology Analyst 2
Agenda Packet Page 28
Senior Accountant-Auditor 1
Senior Building Inspector 3
Senior Civil/Traffic Engineer 3, 4
Senior Management Analyst 1
Senior Planner 1
Senior Traffic Technician 3
Support Services Manager 1
Support Services Supervisor 1
Traffic & Signal Operations Supervisor 1
Consultants * * Disclosure by Consultants shall be subject to the following limitation:
The City Manager may determine in writing that a particular Consultant, although a “designated position,” is hired to perform a range of duties that is limited in scope and thus is not required to fully comply with the disclosure requirements in this section. Such written determination shall include a description of the Consultant’s duties and, based upon that description, a statement of the extent of disclosure requirements. The City Manager’s determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code.
Boards and Commissions Disclosure
Category
Construction Board of Appeals 1
II. Public Officials Specified in Government Code Section 87200: The following positions shall file a statement of economic interests pursuant to Government Code section 87200:
Members of the Citrus Heights City Council
City Manager
City Attorney
Finance Director
Members of the Citrus Heights Planning Commission
III. Disclosure Categories.
CATEGORY/ DESCRIPTION DISCLOSURE GIFTS/LOANS AND TRAVEL PAYMENTS 1 - “Full Disclosure”
For officials and employees
whose duties are broad and
indefinable.
All investments, business
positions in, and income
from sources located in or
doing business in the City.
Interest in real property
located in the City,
including property located
within a two-mile radius of
the City or of any property
owned or used by the City
of Citrus Heights.
Gifts, loans and travel payments from sources
that:
manufacture, sell or provide goods,
equipment, vehicles, machinery or services,
including training or consulting services;
provide leased facilities to the agency;
are subject to the regulatory, permit or
licensing authority of or have an
application for a license or permit pending
before the City; and
or engage in land development,
construction or the acquisition or sale of
real property.
2 - “Limited Disclosure -
Purchasing”
For officials and employees with
limited decision making
authority mainly related to
purchasing goods and services.
All investments, business
positions in, and income
sources of the type which
provides services, supplies,
materials, machinery or
equipment of the type
utilized by the City of
Gifts, loans and travel payments from sources
that:
manufacture, sell or provide goods,
equipment, vehicles, machinery or services,
including training or consulting services;
provide leased facilities to the agency;
are subject to the regulatory, permit or
Agenda Packet Page 29
Citrus Heights. licensing authority of or have an
application for a license or permit pending
before the City; and
engage in land development, construction
or the acquisition or sale of real property.
3 – “Limited Disclosure – Real
Property”
For officials and employees with
limited decision making
authority mainly related to land
development, construction or the
acquisition or sale of real
property.
All investments, business
positions in, and income
sources of the type which
provides services, supplies,
materials, machinery or
equipment of the type
utilized by the City of
Citrus Heights. Interest in
real property located in the
City, including property
located within a two-mile
radius of the City or of any
property owned or used by
the City of Citrus Heights.
Gifts, loans and travel payments from sources
that:
manufacture, sell or provide goods,
equipment, vehicles, machinery or
services, including training or consulting
services;
provide leased facilities to the agency;
are subject to the regulatory, permit or
licensing authority of or have an
application for a license or permit pending
before the City; and
engage in land development, construction
or the acquisition or sale of real property.
4 - “Limited Disclosure -
Regulatory”
For officials and employees with
limited decision making
authority mainly related to
regulatory permitting or
licensing.
All investments, business
positions in, and sources of
income which are subject to
the regulatory, permit or
licensing authority of the
City of Citrus Heights.
Gifts, loans and travel payments from sources
that:
manufacture, sell or provide goods,
equipment, vehicles, machinery or services,
including training or consulting services;
provide leased facilities to the agency;
are subject to the regulatory, permit or
licensing authority of or have an
application for a license or permit pending
before the City; and
engage in land development, construction
or the acquisition or sale of real property.
Agenda Packet Page 30
Printed on Recycled Paper
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 22, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
Susan Talwar, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Resolution Approving a Cost of Living Adjustment plus a one-time payment for Unrepresented Employees and Adopting an Amended Salary Table
Summary and Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-___, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, approving regular unrepresented employees a 3% Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) retroactive to July 3, 2022 (start of the fiscal year/first pay period of the fiscal year), a 3% one-time payment (prorated for those with less than one year of employment), and adopting the amended Salary Table, Exhibit A effective September 22, 2022 (Attachment 1).
This action is applicable to unrepresented employees only. The City Manager and executive management staff are not part of this group and would not be receiving an adjustment or a onetime payment. Represented labor groups are operating under previously negotiated contracts that specify previously agreed upon cost of living adjustments.
Fiscal Impact
The City’s Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget is projected to have a salary savings of $277,053, of which $239,593 is General Fund, plus additional savings from position vacancies. Staff analyzed a salary cost of living adjustment of 3% plus a one-time payment of 3% for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Based on an assumption of 3% salary adjustment plus a 3% one-time payment the Fiscal Year 2022-23 general fund budget impact to salary expense, assuming all authorized positions are filled, is projected to be $290,428. The 10-Year Financial Forecast (Attachment 2) accounts for the 3% adjustment and the one-time payment while maintaining targeted fund level.
The one-time payment would not be applicable to PERS formula calculations. No budget adjustment is required.
Item 10 Agenda Packet Page 31
Subject: Salary Table Amendment and Cost of Living Adjustment Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
Background and Analysis
Labor demand has been high across the region and the nation. In addition, there has been inflationary pressure that has been putting a financial impact on households. Recent news released from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics reports, over the last 12 months, shows the CPIU increased 8.3 percent. Food prices increased 10.3 percent. Energy prices advanced 28.5 percent. The index for all items less food and energy rose 6.3 percent over the year. In addition, staff participating in the city health plan could absorb up to 17.74% increase in out of pocket medical premium contribution.
The City of Citrus Heights has not taken actions to address the impact of increased cost of living for unrepresented employees over the last two fiscal years. Employees have been expressing concern about this matter to executive management staff. The City Manager needed a comprehensive understanding of the city’s fiscal situation before adjustments could be studied and considered. Given recent actions and budget strategies, the fiscal health of the city is improving with significant reserve funds deposits from the budget in FY 2021 of $3,610,700, and forecasted for FY 2022 at $1.3 million at the June 23, 2022 Council Meeting is now forecasted close to $2 million. The City of Citrus Heights improving fiscal health allows for service level restoration, significant reserve deposits to be made, and for the unrepresented staff members who have not recently received adjustments to receive a cost of living adjustment.
Agenda Packet Page 32
Subject: Salary Table Amendment and Cost of Living Adjustment Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
To retain staff and to stay competitive in the marketplace, public agencies implement a cost of living adjustments reflective of market conditions. Administrative Services Department staff researched actions of nearby jurisdictions starting in FY 2021 (post COVID).
Comparison of Unrepresented Bargaining Units for Nearby Cities The table below is a regional comparison of nearby cities where cost of living adjustments were provided during the last two years. One-time payments are noted in the notes section.
City 2022 2021 Notes Applicable
Date
Elk Grove 3.00% 2.00% Jul '22 + 3% one-time payment July, 2022 Folsom 2.25% 2.25% New MOU/ Benefit Summary not
Posted
July, 2022
Lincoln - 3.00% Market Adjustment Compensation
Study - April 2022
N/A
Rancho
Cordova
3.50% 4.65% Compensation Study in 2021 + 5%
above market rate in addition to COLA
July, 2022
Rocklin 3.00% - July, 2022
Roseville 3.00% - January, 2022
Sacramento 3.50% 3.50% June, 2022
West
Sacramento
6.00% 3.00% Jan '22 & Jul'22 - 3% COLA + 3% onetime paymentJuly, 2022 City of Citrus Heights Actions
While unrepresented employees did not receive any cost of living adjustments during 2021 and 2022, the Citrus Heights Police Officers Association (CHPOA) and the Citrus Heights Police Employees Association (CHPEA) did receive cost of living adjustments as part of their current represented labor contracts during this period as outlined in the table below. Unrepresented employees include City Hall employees and also police management positions. No executive management and extra help/temporary employees are included in the unrepresented group.
Citrus Heights 2022 2021
Unrepresented Group - -
CHPOA 2.00% 5.00%
CHPEA 2.00% 5.00%
Average Comparison of Citrus Heights relative to nearby Cities for Unrepresented The table below shows the low and the high adjustments where adjustments were provided along with an average adjustment.
Agenda Packet Page 33
Subject: Salary Table Amendment and Cost of Living Adjustment Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
2022 2021
Low Adjustment* 2.25% 2.00%
High Adjustment* 6.00% 3.00%
Average* 3.46% 3.07%
Citrus Heights 0.00% 0.00%
*Does not included one-time payments
Considering the pressures of inflation, actions of nearby cities and the fiscally prudent budget actions that promote fiscal health, the City Manager and Administrative Services Director recommend a retroactive to July 3, 2022 salary adjustment of 3%, plus a one-time payment of 3% of salary for regular unrepresented employees (prorated for those with less than one year of employment) as of Sept 22, 2022.
Attachments
1. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, approving regular unrepresented employees a 3% Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) retroactive to July 3, 2022, a 3% one-time payment (prorated for those with less than one year of employment), and adopting the amended Salary Table, Exhibit A effective Sept 22, 2022
2. 10-Year Financial Forecast
Agenda Packet Page 34
Printed on Recycled Paper
RESOLUTION NO. 2022 -___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA APPROVING REGULAR UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES A 3% COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT, A 3% ONE-TIME PAYMENT, AND THE AMENDED SALARY TABLE, EXHIBIT A EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 22, 2022
WHEREAS, the City of Citrus Heights engages in sound economic planning practices and is in a fiscal position to afford the adjustment and one-time payment; WHEREAS, a salary adjustment and one-time payment is warranted given the current inflationary economy and need to keep wages competitive with similarly situated jurisdictions in the local region;
WHEREAS, California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 requires governing bodies of local agencies contracting with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System to approve and adopt a payrate schedule in accordance with public meeting laws; and
WHEREAS, the payrate schedule must identify each position by title, the individual payrate amount or ranges for that position, the time base upon which the amounts are based, and track all revisions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights hereby finds and determines the above recitals are true and correct and have served as the basis, in part, for the findings and actions of the City Council as set forth below.
The City Council hereby adopts the following:
• Amended Salary Table, Exhibit A, (attached to this resolution) including 3% cost of living adjustment to regular unrepresented positions effective September 22, 2022 • Retroactive salary adjustment to July 3, 2022 for current council approved regular unrepresented employees as of September 22, 2022
• 3% of salary one-time (non-PERSable) payment current council approved regular unrepresented employees (prorated for those less than one year of employment) as of September 22, 2022
The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 22rd day of September 2022 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members:
NOES: Council Members:
ABSTAIN: Council Members:
ABSENT: Council Members:
_____________________________
Porsche Middleton, Mayor
Agenda Packet Page 35
Printed on Recycled Paper
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Amy Van, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A – Amended Salary Table (Presented to the City Council September 22, 2022) Agenda Packet Page 36
Exhibit A
Regular Unrepresented Position Titles Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Hourly Annual ACCOUNTANT $ 35.6664 $ 36.5581 $ 37.4720 $ 38.4088 $ 39.3690 $ 40.3533 $ 41.3621 $ 42.3961 $ 43.4561 $ 44.5425 x ACCOUNTING MANAGER $ 112,180.83 $ 114,985.35 $ 117,859.99 $ 120,806.49 $ 123,826.65 $ 126,922.32 $ 130,095.37 $ 133,347.76 $ 136,681.45 $ 140,098.49 x ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN $ 26.3442 $ 27.0028 $ 27.6778 $ 28.3698 $ 29.0790 $ 29.8060 $ 30.5512 $ 31.3149 $ 32.0978 $ 32.9003 x ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $ 26.3442 $ 27.0028 $ 27.6778 $ 28.3698 $ 29.0790 $ 29.8060 $ 30.5512 $ 31.3149 $ 32.0978 $ 32.9003 x ADMINSTRATIVE TECHNICIAN $ 28.9785 $ 29.7030 $ 30.4455 $ 31.2067 $ 31.9868 $ 32.7865 $ 33.6062 $ 34.4463 $ 35.3075 $ 36.1902 x ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE $ 156,515.57 $ 160,428.46 $ 164,439.17 $ 168,550.15 $ 172,763.90 $ 177,083.00 $ 181,510.08 $ 186,047.83 $ 190,699.02 $ 195,466.50 x ASSISTANT CITY CLERK $ 79,683.57 $ 81,675.66 $ 83,717.55 $ 85,810.49 $ 87,955.75 $ 90,154.65 $ 92,408.51 $ 94,718.73 $ 97,086.69 $ 99,513.86 x ASSISTANT ENGINEER $ 35.2243 $ 36.1049 $ 37.0075 $ 37.9327 $ 38.8810 $ 39.8530 $ 40.8493 $ 41.8706 $ 42.9173 $ 43.9903 x ASSISTANT PLANNER $ 31.6970 $ 32.4894 $ 33.3016 $ 34.1342 $ 34.9875 $ 35.8622 $ 36.7588 $ 37.6777 $ 38.6197 $ 39.5852 x ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER $ 103,229.88 $ 105,810.62 $ 108,455.89 $ 111,167.29 $ 113,946.47 $ 116,795.13 $ 119,715.01 $ 122,707.88 $ 125,775.58 $ 128,919.97 x ASSOCIATE CIVIL ENGINEER $ 88,652.12 $ 90,868.42 $ 93,140.13 $ 95,468.64 $ 97,855.35 $ 100,301.74 $ 102,809.28 $ 105,379.51 $ 108,014.00 $ 110,714.35 x ASSOCIATE ENGINEER $ 38.7465 $ 39.7152 $ 40.7081 $ 41.7258 $ 42.7689 $ 43.8381 $ 44.9341 $ 46.0574 $ 47.2089 $ 48.3891 x ASSOCIATE PLANNER $ 73,827.98 $ 75,673.68 $ 77,565.52 $ 79,504.66 $ 81,492.27 $ 83,529.58 $ 85,617.82 $ 87,758.26 $ 89,952.22 $ 92,201.03 x BUILDING INSPECTOR I $ 29.7195 $ 30.4624 $ 31.2240 $ 32.0046 $ 32.8047 $ 33.6248 $ 34.4655 $ 35.3271 $ 36.2103 $ 37.1155 x BUILDING INSPECTOR II $ 32.6913 $ 33.5086 $ 34.3463 $ 35.2049 $ 36.0851 $ 36.9872 $ 37.9119 $ 38.8597 $ 39.8312 $ 40.8269 x CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL $ 112,180.83 $ 114,985.35 $ 117,859.99 $ 120,806.49 $ 123,826.65 $ 126,922.32 $ 130,095.37 $ 133,347.76 $ 136,681.45 $ 140,098.49 x CITY CLERK $ 98,537.63 $ 101,001.07 $ 103,526.09 $ 106,114.25 $ 108,767.10 $ 111,486.28 $ 114,273.44 $ 117,130.27 $ 120,058.53 $ 123,059.99 x CITY ENGINEER $ 134,182.54 $ 137,537.10 $ 140,975.53 $ 144,499.92 $ 148,112.42 $ 151,815.23 $ 155,610.61 $ 159,500.87 $ 163,488.39 $ 167,575.60 x CITY MANAGER'S EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT $ 74,186.06 $ 76,040.71 $ 77,941.73 $ 79,890.27 $ 81,887.53 $ 83,934.72 $ 86,033.08 $ 88,183.91 $ 90,388.51 $ 92,648.22 x COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER $ 81,604.66 $ 83,644.78 $ 85,735.90 $ 87,879.30 $ 90,076.28 $ 92,328.19 $ 94,636.39 $ 97,002.30 $ 99,427.36 $ 101,913.04 x CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE INSPECTOR I $ 27.9382 $ 28.6366 $ 29.3525 $ 30.0863 $ 30.8385 $ 31.6095 $ 32.3997 $ 33.2097 $ 34.0399 $ 34.8909 x CONSTRUCTION / MAINTENANCE INSPECTOR II $ 30.7319 $ 31.5002 $ 32.2877 $ 33.0949 $ 33.9223 $ 34.7704 $ 35.6396 $ 36.5306 $ 37.4439 $ 38.3800 x CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE INSPECTOR SUPERVISOR $ 93,845.40 $ 96,191.53 $ 98,596.32 $ 101,061.23 $ 103,587.76 $ 106,177.45 $ 108,831.89 $ 111,552.69 $ 114,341.51 $ 117,200.04 x CUSTODIAN $ 17.2876 $ 17.7198 $ 18.1628 $ 18.6168 $ 19.0823 $ 19.5593 $ 20.0483 $ 20.5495 $ 21.0632 $ 21.5898 x DATABASE & APPLICATIONS ANALYST $ 43.7576 $ 44.8516 $ 45.9728 $ 47.1222 $ 48.3002 $ 49.5077 $ 50.7454 $ 52.0141 $ 53.3144 $ 54.6473 x DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICIAN I $ 25.2303 $ 25.8611 $ 26.5076 $ 27.1703 $ 27.8496 $ 28.5458 $ 29.2595 $ 29.9910 $ 30.7407 $ 31.5092 x DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICIAN II $ 27.7535 $ 28.4473 $ 29.1585 $ 29.8875 $ 30.6347 $ 31.4005 $ 32.1856 $ 32.9902 $ 33.8150 $ 34.6603 x DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST I $ 74,186.06 $ 76,040.71 $ 77,941.73 $ 79,890.27 $ 81,887.53 $ 83,934.72 $ 86,033.08 $ 88,183.91 $ 90,388.51 $ 92,648.22 x
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS SALARY TABLE
Effective: September 22, 2022
Approved by Resolution 2022-___
Agenda Packet Page 37
Regular Unrepresented Position Titles Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Hourly Annual DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST II $ 81,604.66 $ 83,644.78 $ 85,735.90 $ 87,879.30 $ 90,076.28 $ 92,328.19 $ 94,636.39 $ 97,002.30 $ 99,427.36 $ 101,913.04 x ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER $ 105,703.14 $ 108,345.72 $ 111,054.36 $ 113,830.72 $ 116,676.49 $ 119,593.40 $ 122,583.23 $ 125,647.81 $ 128,789.01 $ 132,008.73 x ENGINEERING AIDE $ 23.5166 $ 24.1045 $ 24.7071 $ 25.3248 $ 25.9579 $ 26.6069 $ 27.2720 $ 27.9538 $ 28.6527 $ 29.3690 x ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I $ 25.8683 $ 26.5150 $ 27.1779 $ 27.8573 $ 28.5538 $ 29.2676 $ 29.9993 $ 30.7493 $ 31.5180 $ 32.3060 x ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN II $ 28.4551 $ 29.1665 $ 29.8957 $ 30.6431 $ 31.4091 $ 32.1944 $ 32.9992 $ 33.8242 $ 34.6698 $ 35.5365 x EVENT & COMMUNITY CENTER TECHNICIAN $ 23.8703 $ 24.4671 $ 25.0788 $ 25.7057 $ 26.3484 $ 27.0071 $ 27.6823 $ 28.3743 $ 29.0837 $ 29.8108 x EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT $ 31.8762 $ 32.6731 $ 33.4899 $ 34.3272 $ 35.1853 $ 36.0650 $ 36.9666 $ 37.8908 $ 38.8380 $ 39.8090 x FACILITY AND GROUNDS MANAGER $ 112,180.83 $ 114,985.35 $ 117,859.99 $ 120,806.49 $ 123,826.65 $ 126,922.32 $ 130,095.37 $ 133,347.76 $ 136,681.45 $ 140,098.49 x FACILITY AND GROUNDS SUPERVISOR $ 93,845.40 $ 96,191.53 $ 98,596.32 $ 101,061.23 $ 103,587.76 $ 106,177.45 $ 108,831.89 $ 111,552.69 $ 114,341.51 $ 117,200.04 x FINANCE MANAGER $ 112,180.83 $ 114,985.35 $ 117,859.99 $ 120,806.49 $ 123,826.65 $ 126,922.32 $ 130,095.37 $ 133,347.76 $ 136,681.45 $ 140,098.49 x FINANCIAL ASSISTANT II $ 20.5731 $ 21.0874 $ 21.6146 $ 22.1549 $ 22.7088 $ 23.2765 $ 23.8584 $ 24.4549 $ 25.0663 $ 25.6929 x FLEET TECHNICIAN $ 26.1270 $ 26.7802 $ 27.4497 $ 28.1359 $ 28.8393 $ 29.5603 $ 30.2993 $ 31.0568 $ 31.8332 $ 32.6291 x GRANTS & HOUSING PROGRAM TECHNICIAN I $ 25.2303 $ 25.8611 $ 26.5076 $ 27.1703 $ 27.8496 $ 28.5458 $ 29.2595 $ 29.9910 $ 30.7407 $ 31.5092 x GRANTS & HOUSING PROGRAM TECHNICIAN II $ 27.7535 $ 28.4473 $ 29.1585 $ 29.8875 $ 30.6347 $ 31.4005 $ 32.1856 $ 32.9902 $ 33.8150 $ 34.6603 x HOUSING & HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM COORDINATOR $ 93,845.40 $ 96,191.53 $ 98,596.32 $ 101,061.23 $ 103,587.76 $ 106,177.45 $ 108,831.89 $ 111,552.69 $ 114,341.51 $ 117,200.04 x HOUSING PLANNER $ 73,827.98 $ 75,673.68 $ 77,565.52 $ 79,504.66 $ 81,492.27 $ 83,529.58 $ 85,617.82 $ 87,758.26 $ 89,952.22 $ 92,201.03 x HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN $ 31.8762 $ 32.6731 $ 33.4899 $ 34.3272 $ 35.1853 $ 36.0650 $ 36.9666 $ 37.8908 $ 38.8380 $ 39.8090 x HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST I $ 74,186.06 $ 76,040.71 $ 77,941.73 $ 79,890.27 $ 81,887.53 $ 83,934.72 $ 86,033.08 $ 88,183.91 $ 90,388.51 $ 92,648.22 x HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST II $ 81,604.66 $ 83,644.78 $ 85,735.90 $ 87,879.30 $ 90,076.28 $ 92,328.19 $ 94,636.39 $ 97,002.30 $ 99,427.36 $ 101,913.04 x HUMAN RESOURCES ASSOCIATE $ 26.3442 $ 27.0028 $ 27.6778 $ 28.3698 $ 29.0790 $ 29.8060 $ 30.5512 $ 31.3149 $ 32.0978 $ 32.9003 x HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER $ 117,885.18 $ 120,832.31 $ 123,853.11 $ 126,949.44 $ 130,123.18 $ 133,376.26 $ 136,710.66 $ 140,128.43 $ 143,631.64 $ 147,222.43 x INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SPECIALIST $ 36.3449 $ 37.2536 $ 38.1849 $ 39.1395 $ 40.1180 $ 41.1209 $ 42.1490 $ 43.2027 $ 44.2828 $ 45.3898 x INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST I $ 34.5910 $ 35.4558 $ 36.3422 $ 37.2507 $ 38.1820 $ 39.1366 $ 40.1150 $ 41.1178 $ 42.1458 $ 43.1994 x INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST II $ 38.0501 $ 39.0014 $ 39.9764 $ 40.9758 $ 42.0002 $ 43.0502 $ 44.1264 $ 45.2296 $ 46.3604 $ 47.5194 x INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGER $ 117,885.18 $ 120,832.31 $ 123,853.11 $ 126,949.44 $ 130,123.18 $ 133,376.26 $ 136,710.66 $ 140,128.43 $ 143,631.64 $ 147,222.43 x INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TECHNICIAN $ 30.0995 $ 30.8520 $ 31.6233 $ 32.4139 $ 33.2242 $ 34.0548 $ 34.9062 $ 35.7789 $ 36.6733 $ 37.5902 x JUNIOR PLANNER $ 30.1877 $ 30.9424 $ 31.7159 $ 32.5088 $ 33.3215 $ 34.1546 $ 35.0084 $ 35.8837 $ 36.7807 $ 37.7003 x MAINTENANCE WORKER I $ 20.6536 $ 21.1700 $ 21.6992 $ 22.2417 $ 22.7978 $ 23.3677 $ 23.9519 $ 24.5507 $ 25.1645 $ 25.7936 x MAINTENANCE WORKER II $ 22.7190 $ 23.2870 $ 23.8691 $ 24.4659 $ 25.0775 $ 25.7044 $ 26.3471 $ 27.0057 $ 27.6809 $ 28.3729 x MANAGEMENT ANALYST I $ 74,186.06 $ 76,040.71 $ 77,941.73 $ 79,890.27 $ 81,887.53 $ 83,934.72 $ 86,033.08 $ 88,183.91 $ 90,388.51 $ 92,648.22 x MANAGEMENT ANALYST II $ 81,604.66 $ 83,644.78 $ 85,735.90 $ 87,879.30 $ 90,076.28 $ 92,328.19 $ 94,636.39 $ 97,002.30 $ 99,427.36 $ 101,913.04 x OFFICE ASSISTANT $ 19.0643 $ 19.5409 $ 20.0294 $ 20.5301 $ 21.0434 $ 21.5695 $ 22.1087 $ 22.6614 $ 23.2280 $ 23.8087 x Agenda Packet Page 38
Regular Unrepresented Position Titles Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Hourly Annual OPERATIONS MANAGER $ 112,180.83 $ 114,985.35 $ 117,859.99 $ 120,806.49 $ 123,826.65 $ 126,922.32 $ 130,095.37 $ 133,347.76 $ 136,681.45 $ 140,098.49 x PAYROLL SPECIALIST $ 35.6664 $ 36.5581 $ 37.4720 $ 38.4088 $ 39.3690 $ 40.3533 $ 41.3621 $ 42.3961 $ 43.4561 $ 44.5425 x PAYROLL TECHNICIAN $ 28.9785 $ 29.7030 $ 30.4455 $ 31.2067 $ 31.9868 $ 32.7865 $ 33.6062 $ 34.4463 $ 35.3075 $ 36.1902 x PLANNING MANAGER $ 112,180.83 $ 114,985.35 $ 117,859.99 $ 120,806.49 $ 123,826.65 $ 126,922.32 $ 130,095.37 $ 133,347.76 $ 136,681.45 $ 140,098.49 x PLANNING TECHNICIAN $ 25.9105 $ 26.5583 $ 27.2222 $ 27.9028 $ 28.6004 $ 29.3154 $ 30.0483 $ 30.7995 $ 31.5694 $ 32.3587 x PLANS EXAMINER eff. April 10, 2022 $ 37.5950 $ 38.5349 $ 39.4982 $ 40.4857 $ 41.4978 $ 42.5353 $ 43.5987 $ 44.6886 $ 45.8059 $ 46.9510 x POLICE COMMANDER $ 142,286.87 $ 145,844.04 $ 149,490.14 $ 153,227.40 $ 157,058.08 $ 160,984.54 $ 165,009.15 $ 169,134.38 $ 173,362.74 $ 177,696.81 x POLICE COMMUNICATIONS SUPERVISOR $ 83,435.97 $ 85,521.87 $ 87,659.92 $ 89,851.41 $ 92,097.70 $ 94,400.14 $ 96,760.15 $ 99,179.15 $ 101,658.63 $ 104,200.09 x POLICE LIEUTENANT $ 121,865.88 $ 124,912.53 $ 128,035.34 $ 131,236.23 $ 134,517.13 $ 137,880.06 $ 141,327.06 $ 144,860.24 $ 148,481.75 $ 152,193.79 x POLICE SERGEANT $ 44.3791 $ 45.4886 $ 46.6258 $ 47.7915 $ 48.9863 $ 50.2109 $ 51.4662 $ 52.7529 $ 54.0717 $ 55.4235 x POLICE SERVICES MANAGER $ 96,593.58 $ 99,008.42 $ 101,483.63 $ 104,020.72 $ 106,621.23 $ 109,286.77 $ 112,018.93 $ 114,819.41 $ 117,689.89 $ 124,251.10 x POLICE SERVICES SUPERVISOR $ 81,005.80 $ 83,030.94 $ 85,106.72 $ 87,234.38 $ 89,415.24 $ 91,650.62 $ 93,941.89 $ 96,290.44 $ 98,697.70 $ 104,200.09 x PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT-AUDITOR $ 107,168.40 $ 109,847.61 $ 112,593.80 $ 115,408.64 $ 118,293.86 $ 121,251.20 $ 124,282.48 $ 127,389.55 $ 130,574.29 $ 133,838.64 x PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER $ 112,144.82 $ 114,948.44 $ 117,822.15 $ 120,767.70 $ 123,786.89 $ 126,881.57 $ 130,053.61 $ 133,304.95 $ 136,637.57 $ 140,053.51 x PRINCIPAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST $ 107,168.40 $ 109,847.61 $ 112,593.80 $ 115,408.64 $ 118,293.86 $ 121,251.20 $ 124,282.48 $ 127,389.55 $ 130,574.29 $ 133,838.64 x PROGRAM ANALYST $ 34.5910 $ 35.4558 $ 36.3422 $ 37.2507 $ 38.1820 $ 39.1366 $ 40.1150 $ 41.1178 $ 42.1458 $ 43.1994 x PROGRAM ASSISTANT $ 20.9707 $ 21.4949 $ 22.0323 $ 22.5831 $ 23.1477 $ 23.7264 $ 24.3196 $ 24.9275 $ 25.5507 $ 26.1895 x RECEPTIONIST $ 15.8869 $ 16.2841 $ 16.6912 $ 17.1085 $ 17.5362 $ 17.9746 $ 18.4240 $ 18.8846 $ 19.3567 $ 19.8406 x SENIOR ACCOUNTANT-AUDITOR $ 98,537.63 $ 101,001.07 $ 103,526.09 $ 106,114.25 $ 108,767.10 $ 111,486.28 $ 114,273.44 $ 117,130.27 $ 120,058.53 $ 123,059.99 x SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR $ 37.5950 $ 38.5349 $ 39.4982 $ 40.4857 $ 41.4978 $ 42.5353 $ 43.5987 $ 44.6886 $ 45.8059 $ 46.9510 x SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER eff. July 3, 2022 $ 101,949.77 $ 104,498.51 $ 107,110.97 $ 109,788.75 $ 112,533.47 $ 115,346.80 $ 118,230.47 $ 121,186.23 $ 124,215.89 $ 127,321.29 x SENIOR CIVIL/TRAFFIC ENGINEER $ 101,949.77 $ 104,498.51 $ 107,110.97 $ 109,788.75 $ 112,533.47 $ 115,346.80 $ 118,230.47 $ 121,186.23 $ 124,215.89 $ 127,321.29 x SENIOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TECHNICIAN $ 34.6142 $ 35.4795 $ 36.3665 $ 37.2757 $ 38.2076 $ 39.1628 $ 40.1418 $ 41.1454 $ 42.1740 $ 43.2284 x SENIOR MAINTENANCE WORKER $ 26.1270 $ 26.7802 $ 27.4497 $ 28.1359 $ 28.8393 $ 29.5603 $ 30.2993 $ 31.0568 $ 31.8332 $ 32.6291 x SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST $ 93,845.40 $ 96,191.53 $ 98,596.32 $ 101,061.23 $ 103,587.76 $ 106,177.45 $ 108,831.89 $ 111,552.69 $ 114,341.51 $ 117,200.04 x SENIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT $ 20.9707 $ 21.4949 $ 22.0323 $ 22.5831 $ 23.1477 $ 23.7264 $ 24.3196 $ 24.9275 $ 25.5507 $ 26.1895 x SENIOR PLANNER $ 84,902.17 $ 87,024.72 $ 89,200.34 $ 91,430.35 $ 93,716.11 $ 96,059.01 $ 98,460.49 $ 100,922.00 $ 103,445.05 $ 106,031.18 x SENIOR PLANNING TECHNICIAN $ 28.5016 $ 29.2141 $ 29.9444 $ 30.6931 $ 31.4604 $ 32.2469 $ 33.0531 $ 33.8794 $ 34.7264 $ 35.5945 x SENIOR TRAFFIC TECHNICIAN $ 30.7319 $ 31.5002 $ 32.2877 $ 33.0949 $ 33.9223 $ 34.7704 $ 35.6396 $ 36.5306 $ 37.4439 $ 38.3800 x SENIOR DATABASE AND APPLICATIONS ANALYST $ 48.1333 $ 49.3367 $ 50.5701 $ 51.8343 $ 53.1302 $ 54.4584 $ 55.8199 $ 57.2154 $ 58.6458 $ 60.1119 x STREETS & UTILITIES MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR $ 93,845.40 $ 96,191.53 $ 98,596.32 $ 101,061.23 $ 103,587.76 $ 106,177.45 $ 108,831.89 $ 111,552.69 $ 114,341.51 $ 117,200.04 x TRAFFIC & SIGNAL OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR $ 93,845.40 $ 96,191.53 $ 98,596.32 $ 101,061.23 $ 103,587.76 $ 106,177.45 $ 108,831.89 $ 111,552.69 $ 114,341.51 $ 117,200.04 x Citrus Heights Police Officers Association Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Hourly Annual POLICE OFFICER $ 36.3222 $ 37.2303 $ 38.1611 $ 39.1151 $ 40.0930 $ 41.0953 $ 42.1227 $ 43.1757 $ 44.2551 $ 45.3615 x Non-Sworn Position (non members of Police Officers Association) POLICE OFFICER RECRUIT $ 34.5926 x
Agenda Packet Page 39
Citrus Heights Police Employees Association Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Hourly Annual ANIMAL SERVICES OFFICER I $ 26.2424 $ 26.8985 $ 27.5710 $ 28.2602 $ 28.9667 $ 29.6909 $ 30.4332 $ 31.1940 $ 31.9739 $ 32.7732 x ANIMAL SERVICES OFFICER II $ 28.8666 $ 29.5882 $ 30.3279 $ 31.0861 $ 31.8633 $ 32.6599 $ 33.4764 $ 34.3133 $ 35.1711 $ 36.0504 x CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I $ 26.2424 $ 26.8985 $ 27.5710 $ 28.2602 $ 28.9667 $ 29.6909 $ 30.4332 $ 31.1940 $ 31.9739 $ 32.7732 x CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II $ 28.8666 $ 29.5882 $ 30.3279 $ 31.0861 $ 31.8633 $ 32.6599 $ 33.4764 $ 34.3133 $ 35.1711 $ 36.0504 x CODE ENFORCEMENT TECHNICIAN $ 23.8567 $ 24.4532 $ 25.0645 $ 25.6911 $ 26.3334 $ 26.9917 $ 27.6665 $ 28.3582 $ 29.0671 $ 29.7938 x COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER I $ 21.8494 $ 22.3956 $ 22.9555 $ 23.5294 $ 24.1176 $ 24.7206 $ 25.3386 $ 25.9721 $ 26.6214 $ 27.2869 x COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER II $ 24.0344 $ 24.6353 $ 25.2512 $ 25.8824 $ 26.5295 $ 27.1927 $ 27.8726 $ 28.5694 $ 29.2836 $ 30.0157 x CRIME SCENE / PROPERTY EVIDENCE SPECIALIST I $ 26.3832 $ 27.0428 $ 27.7188 $ 28.4118 $ 29.1221 $ 29.8502 $ 30.5964 $ 31.3613 $ 32.1454 $ 32.9490 x CRIME SCENE / PROPERTY EVIDENCE SPECIALIST II $ 29.0214 $ 29.7470 $ 30.4906 $ 31.2529 $ 32.0342 $ 32.8351 $ 33.6560 $ 34.4974 $ 35.3598 $ 36.2438 x POLICE CRIME ANALYST $ 31.9237 $ 32.7218 $ 33.5398 $ 34.3783 $ 35.2378 $ 36.1187 $ 37.0217 $ 37.9472 $ 38.8959 $ 39.8683 x POLICE DISPATCHER I * $ 28.8109 $ 29.5312 $ 30.2695 $ 31.0262 $ 31.8019 $ 32.5969 $ 33.4118 $ 34.2471 $ 35.1033 $ 35.9809 x POLICE DISPATCHER II * $ 31.6921 $ 32.4844 $ 33.2965 $ 34.1289 $ 34.9822 $ 35.8567 $ 36.7531 $ 37.6720 $ 38.6138 $ 39.5791 x POLICE RECORDS ASSISTANT I * $ 21.6275 $ 22.1682 $ 22.7224 $ 23.2905 $ 23.8727 $ 24.4695 $ 25.0813 $ 25.7083 $ 26.3510 $ 27.0098 x POLICE RECORDS ASSISTANT II * $ 23.7903 $ 24.3850 $ 24.9947 $ 25.6195 $ 26.2600 $ 26.9165 $ 27.5894 $ 28.2792 $ 28.9861 $ 29.7108 x SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER $ 27.6395 $ 28.3305 $ 29.0388 $ 29.7648 $ 30.5089 $ 31.2716 $ 32.0534 $ 32.8547 $ 33.6761 $ 34.5180 x SENIOR ANIMAL SERVICES OFFICER $ 33.1994 $ 34.0294 $ 34.8801 $ 35.7521 $ 36.6459 $ 37.5621 $ 38.5011 $ 39.4637 $ 40.4502 $ 41.4615 x SENIOR CRIME SCENE / PROPERTY EVIDENCE SPECIALIST $ 31.9237 $ 32.7218 $ 33.5398 $ 34.3783 $ 35.2378 $ 36.1187 $ 37.0217 $ 37.9472 $ 38.8959 $ 39.8683 x SENIOR POLICE DISPATCHER * $ 34.8613 $ 35.7328 $ 36.6262 $ 37.5418 $ 38.4804 $ 39.4424 $ 40.4284 $ 41.4391 $ 42.4751 $ 43.5370 x SENIOR POLICE RECORDS ASSISTANT * $ 26.1693 $ 26.8236 $ 27.4941 $ 28.1815 $ 28.8860 $ 29.6082 $ 30.3484 $ 31.1071 $ 31.8848 $ 32.6819 x SENIOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER $ 31.7533 $ 32.5471 $ 33.3608 $ 34.1948 $ 35.0497 $ 35.9259 $ 36.8241 $ 37.7447 $ 38.6883 $ 39.6555 x *Hourly rate based on 1872 annual hours
CITY COUNCIL $600 per month (as outlined in Government Code § 36516) Agenda Packet Page 40
Extra Help Hourly Range Low Hourly Range High
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER - EXTRA HELP $ 37.6180 $ 46.9797
CITY ENGINEER - EXTRA HELP $ 62.6319 $ 78.2186
COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER - EXTRA HELP $ 21.8494 $ 27.2869 DATA ENTRY ASSISTANT - EXTRA HELP $ 16.6365 $ 20.7768
FACILITY ATTENDANT $ 16.7841 $ 16.7841
FACILITY ATTENDANT TRAINEE $ 15.0000 $ 15.0000
INTERN - EXTRA HELP $ 15.0000 $ 15.0000
JUNIOR ENGINEERING AIDE- EXTRA HELP $ 16.3084 $ 20.3669 MANAGEMENT AIDE - EXTRA HELP $ 17.4969 $ 21.8512
MANAGEMENT INTERN - EXTRA HELP $ 15.2146 $ 19.0010
OFFICE ASSISTANT - EXTRA HELP $ 18.5090 $ 23.1152
POLICE DISPATCH ASSISTANT - EXTRA HELP $ 20.5792 $ 25.7006 POLICE DISPATCHER-PER DIEM A $ 30.5396 $ 30.5396
POLICE DISPATCHER-PER DIEM B $ 35.9809 $ 35.9809
POLICE DISPATCHER-PER DIEM C $ 39.5791 $ 39.5791
POLICE FLEET MANAGER- EXTRA HELP $ 52.3622 $ 65.3932
POLICE OFFICER - RESERVE II-EXTRA HELP $ 15.0000 $ 19.2600 POLICE OFFICER - RESERVE I-EXTRA HELP $ 36.3222 $ 45.3615 POLICE OFFICER - R1 TRAINEE-EXTRA HELP $ 19.5000 $ 20.8650 POLICE RECORDS ASSISTANT I - EXTRA HELP $ 21.6275 $ 27.0098 POLICE RECORDS ASSISTANT II - EXTRA HELP $ 23.7903 $ 29.7108 PROGRAM ANALYST - EXTRA HELP $ 33.5835 $ 41.9412
PROPERTY CLERK - EXTRA HELP $ 20.7296 $ 25.8884
SENIOR ACCOUNT-AUDITOR - EXTRA HELP $ 45.9940 $ 57.4403 SENIOR POLICE RECORDS ASSISTANT -EXTRA HELP $ 26.1693 $ 32.6819 VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR - EXTRA HELP $ 24.0344 $ 30.0157
Executive Management Annual Range Low Annual Range High ADMINSTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR 142,858.65 188,933.27
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 157,146.77 207,826.60
CHIEF OF POLICE 174,506.21 230,787.26
CITY MANAGER eff. January 13, 2022 240,000.00 240,000.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 142,858.65 188,933.27
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR 150,003.73 198,379.93
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DIRECTOR 142,858.65 188,933.27 FINANCE DIRECTOR 142,858.65 188,933.27
GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR 147,146.52 194,601.27
Agenda Packet Page 41
General Fund Ten Year Financial Forecast
With Partial Street Funding
June 2022
FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2029-30 FY 2030-31 FY 2031-32 Actual Budgeted
Year-End
Projection
Mid-Cycle
Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected TOTAL REVENUE 36,926,844 35,209,335 35,801,420 42,135,122 42,823,572 44,165,000 45,550,581 46,985,360 48,111,659 49,266,856 50,399,988 51,438,136 52,616,021 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES 33,316,148 37,328,527 34,427,668 35,355,072 40,357,212 40,704,417 40,993,156 42,573,174 43,790,133 45,043,470 46,334,293 47,663,706 49,033,896 STREET REPAIRS 2,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 Auburn Blvd - Phase 2 Match 4,000,000
Net Operating Position 3,610,696 (2,119,192) 1,373,752 6,780,050 (3,533,639) (539,417) 557,426 412,186 321,525 223,386 65,695 (225,570) (417,875) Ending Reserve Balance $ 8,419,923 $ 6,300,731 $ 9,793,675 $ 16,573,724 $ 13,040,085 $ 12,500,669 $ 13,058,094 $ 13,470,280 $ 13,791,805 $ 14,015,191 $ 14,080,886 $ 13,855,316 $ 13,437,441 Minimum Reserve per City Council Policy (17%) $ 5,663,745 $ 6,345,850 $ 5,852,704 $ 6,010,362 $ 7,880,726 $ 7,599,751 $ 7,648,836 $ 7,917,440 $ 8,124,323 $ 8,337,390 $ 8,556,830 $ 8,782,830 $ 9,015,762 Over(under) Reserve Target 2,756,178 -45,119 3,940,971 10,563,362 5,159,359 4,900,918 5,409,258 5,552,840 5,667,482 5,677,801 5,524,056 5,072,486 4,421,678 City Manager Target Reserve @25% 8,329,037 9,332,132 8,606,917 8,838,768 11,589,303 11,176,104 11,248,289 11,643,294 11,947,533 12,260,868 12,583,573 12,915,927 13,258,474 Over(under) Reserve Target 90,886 -3,031,401 1,186,758 7,734,956 1,450,782 1,324,564 1,809,805 1,826,986 1,844,272 1,754,323 1,497,312 939,389 178,967 Agenda Packet Page 42
Printed on Recycled Paper
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 22, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Susan Talwar, Administrative Services Director
Raj Prasad, Accounting Manager
Tammy Nossardi, Finance Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution to Update Plan Coordinator for Mission Square 457 Deferred Compensation Plan and 401a Money Purchase Plan Summary and Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution 2022-____ to modify designated Plan Coordinator for the Mission Square 457 Deferred Compensation Plan and 401a Money Purchase Plan.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
Background and Analysis
The City currently contracts with Mission Square (formally ICMA-RC) to provide a Deferred Compensation and 401a Money Purchase Plan. These programs provide an alternative means for employees to augment their retirement income. On April 25, 2013 the City Council adopted Resolution 2013-036, which modified the designated Plan Coordinator as the Human Resources and City Information Director. The City no longer uses the title of Human Resources and City Information Director and recommends council approve the title of Administrative Services Director be the designated Plan Coordinator for the City’s Mission Square 457 Deferred Compensation Plan and 401a Money Purchase Plan.
In order to satisfy and maintain compliance with the requirements of the Mission Square Retirement related to the City’s 457 Deferred Compensation Plan and 401a Money Purchase Plan, a resolution modifying the position title of the designated Plan Coordinator is required.
Attachments
Item 11 Agenda Packet Page 43
Subject: Update Plan Coordinator for Mission Square 457 Deferred Comp Plan & 401a Money Purchase Plan
Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
1. Resolution 2022-_____ to modify designated Plan Coordinator for the Mission Square 457 Deferred Compensation Plan and 401a Money Purchase Plan.
Agenda Packet Page 44
Printed on Recycled Paper
RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS,
CALIFORNIA, TO MODIFY DESIGNATED PLAN COORDINATOR FOR MISSION SQUARE 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AND 401a MONEY PURCHASE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Citrus Heights has employees rendering valuable services; and WHEREAS, the establishment of a deferred compensation plan and money purchase plan for such employees serves the interests of the City of Citrus Heights by enabling it to provide reasonable retirement security for its employees, by providing increased flexibility in its personnel management system, and by assisting in the attraction and retention of competent personnel; and WHEREAS, the City of Citrus Heights has determined that the establishment of a deferred compensation plan and money purchase plan to be administered by Mission Square Retirement corporation serves the above objectives; and
WHEREAS, under Resolution 2013-036, the City designated the title of the Plan Coordinator as the Human Resources and City Information Director; and WHEREAS, the City no longer uses the title of Human Resources and City Information Director and has designated the Administrative Services Director to fulfill the responsibilities formerly required of the Human Resources and City Information Director to the 457 Compensation Plan and 401a Money Purchase Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Plans require adoption of a Resolution by the legislative body when the title of the designated Plan Coordinator are changed.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights adopt this Resolution changing the designated title of the Plan Coordinator from Human Resources and City Information Director to Administrative Services Director.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Administrative Services Director shall be the Plan Coordinator for these plans; shall receive necessary reports, notices, etc. from Mission Square Retirement; shall cast, on behalf of the City of Citrus Heights, any required votes under Mission Square Retirement; administrative duties to carry out the plans may be assigned to the appropriate departments, and is authorized to execute all necessary agreements with Mission Square Retirement incidental to the initiation and ongoing administrations of the Plans. The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 22 day of September 2022 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members:
NOES: Council Members:
ABSTAIN: Council Members:
ABSENT: Council Members:
Agenda Packet Page 45
Porsche Middleton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Van, City Clerk
Agenda Packet Page 46
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 22, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Susan Talwar, Administrative Services Director
Raj Prasad, Accounting Manager
Tammy Nossardi, Finance Manager
SUBJECT: Update of Officers for Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Summary and Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution 2022-____ authorizing the investment of City monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund by certain city officers and authorizing them to order the deposit or withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF).
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
Background and Analysis
California Government Code, Chapter 730 of the statutes of 1976, Section 16429.1 created a Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury for the deposit of money of a local agency for purposes of investment by the State Treasurer. The LAIF program offers local agencies the opportunity to participate in a major investment portfolio using the investment expertise of the State Treasurer’s Office professional investment staff.
Only designated individuals have the authority to order the deposit or withdrawal of funds in LAIF. An adopted resolution is required when authorized officers are added or removed from the California State Treasurer’s Office Local Agency Investment Fund Authorization for Transfer of Funds document. The attached resolution updates the City’s list of officers as follows:
Susan Talwar Administrative Services Director
Rajneil Prasad Accounting Manager
Tammy Nossardi Finance Manager
Item 12 Agenda Packet Page 47
Subject: Update of Officers for Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
Ashley Feeney City Manager
Attachments
1. Resolution 2022-_____ authorizing the Investment of Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund by certain City Officers and Authorizing them to Order the Deposit or Withdrawal of Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund.
2. California State Treasurer’s Office Local Agency Investment Funds Authorization for Transfer of Funds document.
Agenda Packet Page 48
Printed on Recycled Paper
RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE INVESTMENT OF CITY MONIES IN THE LOCAL
AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND BY CERTAIN CITY OFFICERS AND AUTHORIZING
THEM TO ORDER THE DEPOSIT OR WITHDRAWAL OF MONIES IN THE LOCAL
AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND
WHEREAS, Pursuant to chapter 730 of the statues of 1976, Section 16429.1 was added to the California Government Code to create a Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury for the deposit of money of a local agency for purposes of investment by the State Treasurer; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights does hereby find that the deposit and withdrawal of money in the Local Agency Investment Fund, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code section 16429.1, for the purpose of investment as stated therein are in the best interests of the City.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights does hereby authorize the deposit and withdrawal of City monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury in accordance with the provisions of Section 16429.1 of the Government Code for the purpose of investment as stated therein, and verification by the State Treasurer’s Office of all banking information provide in that regard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights that the following City officers or their successors in office shall be authorized to order the deposit or withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund as of September 22, 2022.
Susan Talwar Administrative Services Director
Rajneil Prasad Accounting Manager
Tammy Nossardi Finance Manager
Ashley Feeney City Manager
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 22 day of September 2022 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members:
NOES: Council Members:
ABSTAIN: Council Members:
ABSENT: Council Members:
Porsche Middleton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Van, City Clerk
Agenda Packet Page 49
Exhibit
1. California State Treasurer’s Office Local Agency Investment Funds Authorization for Transfer of Funds document.
Agenda Packet Page 50
Agenda Packet Page 51
Printed on Recycled Paper
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 22, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Casey Kempenaar, Community Development Director
Ryan Jones, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Potential Annexation Work Plan
Summary and Recommendation
At the May 10, 2022 Strategic Planning Meeting, the City Council established an objective to evaluate opportunities for annexation into the City of Citrus Heights. This staff report is intended to serve as an annexation work plan for the City Council’s consideration and opportunity for the Council to provide additional direction.
Staff recommends Council review the staff presentation and provide direction to staff if future action is desired.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact related to this action. There may be future fiscal impacts depending on the direction of the City Council. Based on discussions with Sacramento County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo), annexation costs can vary widely; however, expenditures for an annexation similar to Roseville Pointe are anticipated to be about $100,000 to $150,000.
As outlined later in this staff report, a Fiscal Impact Analysis is required for each proposed area of annexation. It is anticipated that each Fiscal Impact Analysis will range between $8,000 and $40,000 depending on the geography and land use for each area. If the Council elects to move forward with this step, staff will release a Request for Proposals for Fiscal Impact Analysis services, which will require a budget allocation and approval from the City Council.
Background and Analysis
At the May 10, 2022 Strategic Planning Meeting, the City Council established an objective to evaluate opportunities for annexation into the City of Citrus Heights. This staff report is intended to serve as an annexation work plan for the City Council’s consideration and opportunity for the Council to provide additional direction.
Item 13 Agenda Packet Page 52
Subject: Potential Annexation Work Plan
Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
General Plan Context
Shortly after incorporation, the City prepared its first General Plan which was adopted in 2000.
The original General Plan and subsequent 2011 update included several actions related to annexation:
Goal 16: Make adequate land available for economic development opportunities Policy 16.1: Expand the boundaries of the City to provide for future non-residential development, as shown on Map 1: Land Use Diagram.
Actions:
A. Request LAFCo to amend the City’s Sphere of Influence to allow for future expansion of the City to accommodate new businesses and industry to diversify the City’s economic base.
B. Pursue possible annexations of all or parts of areas around the Greenback Lane and Auburn Boulevard/Riverside Avenue
interchanges to gain better control of routes into the City and to establish a distinctive City presence along Interstate 80.
C. Pursue annexation of land northwest of the current city limits to provide for existing and future industrial development.
D. Conduct a fiscal analysis of potential annexations.
Annexation History
Since incorporation, annexation of various portions of unincorporated Sacramento County have been considered and analyzed. For a number of reasons, largely fiscally driven, annexation has not been pursued beyond the initial analysis phase. Some conversations related to annexation progressed further than others; however none came to fruition.
The following is a brief summary of two annexations and associated fiscal analysis considered in the past. The results included in the associated attachments are likely to change if updated to reflect current market conditions, property values, and property tax exchange agreements; however, these results are included as a baseline for reference.
Roseville Pointe/Northwest Reserve
In 2006, the City contemplated annexation of the Roseville Pointe neighborhood (sometimes referred to the Northwest Reserve). Attachment A depicts the Proposed Sphere of Influence affiliated with this effort. This area includes 289 single-family units, three vacant parcels (6.8 acres zoned commercial, 1.1 acres with a water tank, and a 1.8 acre park).
In 2006, the City contracted with Economic and Planning Systems (EPS) to evaluate the fiscal impacts of the proposed annexation. One report, “Northwest Reserve Annexation Fiscal Impact Analysis, August 9, 2006” (Attachment B), analyzed the potential fiscal impact of the proposed annexation. Under this analysis, the report concluded that without the development of the Agenda Packet Page 53
Subject: Potential Annexation Work Plan
Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
commercially zoned parcels into a Neighborhood Commercial retail space1, the annexation would result in a deficit of approximately of $100,000 annually. However, if the commercial parcels were included in the annexation, the results would be a $40,000 annual surplus (if developed with a Neighborhood Commercial retail space).
Subsequently, in 2007, EPS prepared a memo, “Roseville Pointe Annexation Fiscal Impact Analysis Update” (Attachment C), updating the original analysis to reflect State legislation related to Vehicle License Fee revenues and additional revenue sharing discussions between Sacramento County and the City at that time. This updated analysis anticipated a $27,000 General Fund deficit.
Greenback Gateway
In 2006, the City contemplated annexation of the Greenback Gateway area, west of the current City Limits to Interstate 80. Attachment D depicts the Proposed Sphere of Influence affiliated with this effort. This annexation would include Verner Oaks Apartments, Country Squire Estates Mobile Home Park, Century Theaters, Public Storage and the East Lawn Cemetery.
The Fiscal Impact Analysis (Attachment E) and Updated Fiscal Analysis (Attachment F) for the Greenback Gateway determined that the annexation would result in an annual General Fund deficit of $45,000 - $134,000.
Annexation Process
The process of annexation is a lengthy and complex process. The process involves many stakeholders including the City, Sacramento County, LAFCo, and property owners/residents of any area considered for annexation. The process may be accomplished by petition of registered voters or land owners or by resolution of the City Council.
LAFCo has the authority to approve, disapprove, modify or condition changes of organization, annexation, detachment, consolidation, district formation or city incorporation. There are three LAFCo hearings required for annexation to occur:
1. Sphere of Influence Amendment Hearing: At this hearing, LAFCo would consider Citrus Heights’ Sphere of Influence (SOI) and determine whether it should be amended based upon a Municipal Service Review (MSR), prepared by LAFCo. The MSR is a snapshot in time on how well an agency is currently providing service. The data from the MSR is then used to determine how the agency should grow and by how much. Amending an SOI to include areas outside of an agency’s service area sets the stage for future annexations.
2. Approval Hearing: At this hearing, the Commission considers whether to approve (conditionally or unconditionally) or deny an annexation request. This is where LAFCo
1 The vacant site located at the northwestern corner of Roseville Road and Antelope Road is currently comprised of three parcels that are zoned MP (Industrial Office Park) to the north and LC (Light Commercial) to the south. The northern portion of the site is currently owned by a mini-storage developer and the southern portion is owned by a petroleum company.
Agenda Packet Page 54
Subject: Potential Annexation Work Plan
Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
staff’s review and recommendation on the need for annexation, the analysis of the environmental consequences, and the tax sharing agreement between city and county are provided for the Commission’s review and determination.
3. Conducting Authority (Protest) Hearing: This hearing only happens if the Commission approves an annexation. At this hearing, LAFCo determines whether there is a sufficient amount of protests by the landowners and/or voters2 in the annexing areas to determine whether the annexation moves forward, fails, or becomes subject to an election.
If a group of opponents within the annexation area do not want to see the area annexed to the city, they have the ability to protest the action and stop it outright with a majority protest (50% plus one) or force the issue to election if more than 25% protest but less than 50% to force the issue to election.
The period between initiation of proceeding (petition/resolution) and commission action can take 6-12 months. If an election is required, it can be handled in the traditional sense at a regularly scheduled election or, in special circumstances, by mailed ballot to registered voters in the annexation area. (Government Code Section 57125).
The City would be responsible for the expense of the election in conjunction with the County Elections Department. Costs for incorporating an annexation into a General Election are anticipated to range between $2,500 and $6,000 (Special Elections are significantly more expensive and based on actual costs).
Key LAFCo considerations
Attachment G provides an overview of the LAFCo process and key considerations for LAFCo during the annexation process. Prior to considering any annexation, the City is required to demonstrate to LAFCo that it will collect sufficient revenues to offset the costs to serve the annexed land.
A financial analysis is required to determine if sufficient revenues are generated by the annexed areas to offset costs to serve. Revenues evaluated as part of the analysis may include:
- Extend existing charges (Utility User Tax, Sales Tax, etc.) - Potential property tax exchange with the County
- Permits/Licenses
- Special District Revenue (Stormwater)
If the Financial Analysis concludes there is a revenue shortfall to serve the annexed areas, additional revenue will be required before the annexation can proceed. This would typically be addressed by implementing a special tax or benefit assessment on the subject parcels. If this is
2 LAFCO mails written notice of a hearing to both registered voters and land owners which are able to file a protest.
Each registered voter is able to protest and landowners are able to vote proportionately based on current assessed value of land within the annexation area
Agenda Packet Page 55
Subject: Potential Annexation Work Plan
Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
the case LAFCo can approve the annexation contingent upon those residents voting for and approving a special tax or benefit assessment. If the impacted owners vote to tax themselves for the shortfall, the annexation may proceed; however, if they vote against the assessment, the annexation would fail.
Council Direction
At the May 10, 2022 Strategic Planning Meeting, the City Council established an objective to evaluate opportunities for annexation. During this meeting the Council discussed Roseville Pointe for consideration but also suggested other locations along the City’s border should be evaluated as well. Locations discussed during this meeting include:
a. Roseville Pointe
b. Dewey Drive/Celtic Cross Church
c. Northwest corner of Fair Oaks Boulevard and Madison Avenue Proposed Work Plan
After the Council provides direction on areas to consider for annexation, staff will implement the work plan below for the potential annexation areas identified by Council:
1. Communicate with Sacramento County regarding tax sharing framework3
2. Use targeted mailers to connect with affected geographies considered for annexation.
Host an Open House for impacted properties to determine level of support for annexation areas. The Open House will include City Staff, LAFCo, and key stakeholders to answer questions and receive feedback.
3. Conduct Fiscal Impact Analysis based on Step 1 for areas where residents support annexation.
4. Report to City Council the outcomes of Steps 1-3 and receive direction on next steps.
Attachments
A. 2006 Northwest Reserve SOI Map
B. 2006 Northwest Reserve Fiscal Analysis
C. 2007 Roseville Point Fiscal Analysis
D. 2006 Greenback Gateway SOI Map
E. 2006 Greenback Gateway Fiscal Analysis
F. 2008 Greenback Gateway Fiscal Analysis Update
G. LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations (OPR 2012)
3 Annexation attempts can fail if the affected city and county cannot reach agreement on a property tax split. In the early planning stages, the applicant should ascertain if a master property tax exchange agreement exists between the affected city and the county, and if there are concerns about the likelihood of a property tax exchange agreement.
Property tax exchange agreements can be structured to address fiscal and related issues. (OPR 2012) Agenda Packet Page 56
Agenda Packet Page 57
Agenda Packet Page 58
Agenda Packet Page 59
Agenda Packet Page 60
Agenda Packet Page 61
Agenda Packet Page 62
Agenda Packet Page 63
Agenda Packet Page 64
Agenda Packet Page 65
Agenda Packet Page 66
Agenda Packet Page 67
Agenda Packet Page 68
Agenda Packet Page 69
Agenda Packet Page 70
Agenda Packet Page 71
Agenda Packet Page 72
Agenda Packet Page 73
Agenda Packet Page 74
Agenda Packet Page 75
Agenda Packet Page 76
Agenda Packet Page 77
Agenda Packet Page 78
Agenda Packet Page 79
Agenda Packet Page 80
Agenda Packet Page 81
Agenda Packet Page 82
Agenda Packet Page 83
Agenda Packet Page 84
Agenda Packet Page 85
Agenda Packet Page 86
Agenda Packet Page 87
Agenda Packet Page 88
Agenda Packet Page 89
Agenda Packet Page 90
Agenda Packet Page 91
Agenda Packet Page 92
Agenda Packet Page 93
Agenda Packet Page 94
Agenda Packet Page 95
Agenda Packet Page 96
Agenda Packet Page 97
Agenda Packet Page 98
Agenda Packet Page 99
Agenda Packet Page 100
Agenda Packet Page 101
Agenda Packet Page 102
Agenda Packet Page 103
Agenda Packet Page 104
Agenda Packet Page 105
Agenda Packet Page 106
Agenda Packet Page 107
Agenda Packet Page 108
Agenda Packet Page 109
Agenda Packet Page 110
Agenda Packet Page 111
Agenda Packet Page 112
Agenda Packet Page 113
Agenda Packet Page 114
Agenda Packet Page 115
Agenda Packet Page 116
Agenda Packet Page 117
Agenda Packet Page 118
Agenda Packet Page 119
Agenda Packet Page 120
Agenda Packet Page 121
Agenda Packet Page 122
Agenda Packet Page 123
Agenda Packet Page 124
Agenda Packet Page 125
Agenda Packet Page 126
Agenda Packet Page 127
Agenda Packet Page 128
Agenda Packet Page 129
Agenda Packet Page 130
Agenda Packet Page 131
Agenda Packet Page 132
Agenda Packet Page 133
Agenda Packet Page 134
Agenda Packet Page 135
Agenda Packet Page 136
Agenda Packet Page 137
Agenda Packet Page 138
Agenda Packet Page 139
Agenda Packet Page 140
Agenda Packet Page 141
Agenda Packet Page 142
Agenda Packet Page 143
Agenda Packet Page 144
Agenda Packet Page 145
February 7, 2012
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Edmund G. Brown, Jr,
Governor
GOVERNOR’S OFFICE
OF PLANNING AND
RESEARCH
1400 Tenth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
P.O. Box 3044
Sacramento, CA 95812
(916) 322-2318
www.opr.ca.gov
LAFCOs,
General
Plans,
and City
Annexations
Agenda Packet Page 146
This page intentionally left blank
Agenda Packet Page 147
iii LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
State of California
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research
Ken Alex, Director
Project Manager
Ben Rubin, OPR
Prepared by
Ken Lee, RSG, Inc
Holly Whatley, Colantuono & Levin, PC
Contributors
Chris Calfee, OPR
Debbie Davis, OPR
Cuauhtémoc Gonzalez, OPR
Michael McCormick, OPR
Advisory Committee
William Chiat, Executive Director, CALAFCo
Carole Cooper, Sonoma LAFCo
Steve Lucas, Butte LAFCo
Lou Ann Texeira, Contra Costa LAFCo
This publication was developed through the support of the California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions (CALAFCO) (http://www.calafco.org)
Please feel free to reproduce all or part of this document. You need not secure permission. We ask that you print it accurately and give credit to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR).
Agenda Packet Page 148
This page intentionally left blank
Agenda Packet Page 149
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations v
Table of Contents
Introduction........................................................................................................................... 2 Background: The Role of the LAFCO...................................................................................... 3 Local Government Role in Planning and Regulating Land Use................................................. 5 Annexations........................................................................................................................... 6 Pre-Application............................................................................................................................. 6 Application Filing and Processing................................................................................................. 6 LAFCO Review and Consideration.............................................................................................. 7 Protest Proceedings........................................................................................................................ 7 Final Certification.......................................................................................................................... 8 Consistent Annexations.......................................................................................................... 9 Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities........................................................................ 12 Spheres of Influence and Municipal Service Reviews.............................................................. 13 Prezoning............................................................................................................................. 16 Environmental Review.......................................................................................................... 17 Summary.............................................................................................................................. 19 Conclusion........................................................................................................................... 21 Table of Cases Cited.............................................................................................................. 22 Annexation Process Flowchart.............................................................................................. 23 Agenda Packet Page 150
This page intentionally left blank
Agenda Packet Page 151
2 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
Introduction
“It is the intent of the Legislature that each commission … establish written policies and procedures and exercise its powers ... in a manner consistent with those policies and procedures to encourage and provide planned, well-ordered, efficient urban development patterns with appropriate consideration of preserving open-space lands within those patterns…Among the purposes of a commission are discouraging urban sprawl, preserving open-space and prime agricultural lands, efficiently providing government services, and encouraging the orderly formation and development of local agencies based upon local conditions and circumstances” (Gov. Code Section 56300 and 56301).
Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, as Amended, Title 5, Division 3, Part 2, California Government Code In 2000, the Legislature passed AB 2838 (Chapter 761, Statutes of 2000) making the broadest and most significant set of sweeping changes to local government reorganization law since the creation of Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCOs). In addition to renaming the act the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (“CKH Act”), AB 2838 affirmed and strengthened the role of LAFCO in helping shape the future physical and economic growth and development of the State, including, once again, the role of LAFCO in annexation proceedings.
To provide a primer on LAFCOs from a land use planning perspective, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), in cooperation with the California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions (CALAFCO), has prepared this publication about the city annexation process, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and local general plans. The CKH Act provides opportunities for dovetailing the requirements of the Planning and Zoning, CEQA and annexation laws which, in turn, can promote efficiency in processing applications. OPR and CALAFCO also recognize that early consultation and collaboration between local agencies and LAFCO on annexations is a best practice that is encouraged in this publication, including coordination on CEQA review, general process and procedures, and fiscal issues.
Although the CKH Act addresses district formation, incorporation, and other types of changes of organization, this publication focuses on city annexations. Consequently, it is geared towards the non-LAFCO planner and city official and is not intended to be an in-depth, technical discussion of the CKH Act. OPR and CALAFCO offer best practice tips, relevant to current and emerging trends and topics in California land use law and the CKH Act.
This publication is based upon OPR’s and CALAFCO’s reading of current State statute, recent case law, and the General Plan Guidelines, as updated by OPR. References are to the California Government Code unless otherwise indicated.
For a review of the CKH Act as it relates to California planning, zoning, and development laws, please refer to Guide to California Planning, 3rd Edition or Longtin’s California Land Use, 2nd Edition. These general references address planning, zoning, subdivisions, sign controls, and exactions, as well as LAFCO activities. For more general information about the role, structure, and powers of LAFCOs, refer to It’s Time to Draw the Line: A Citizen’s Guide to LAFCOs (May 2003).
Agenda Packet Page 152
3 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
Background: The Role of the LAFCO
The Knox-Nisbet Act, the Municipal Organization Act (MORGA), and the District Reorganization Act – three separate, but interrelated State laws – authorized local boundary changes and municipal reorganization, such as annexations, incorporations, and the creation of special districts. Long-standing difficulties in implementing and reconciling these distinct, and at times incompatible, laws led the Legislature to adopt the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act. The Cortese-Knox Act combined these statutes into a single law, which eliminated duplicate and incompatible sections.
In 2000, the Legislature passed AB 2838 (Hertzberg), which was the most significant and comprehensive legislative reform to local government reorganization law since the 1963 statute that originally created LAFCOs in each county.
Development of the legislation resulted from the recommendations of the Commission on Local Governance for the 21st Century. For more information on the Commission, please see their 2000 publication, Growth Within Bounds.
AB 2838 (Hertzberg, 2000), recognizes and affirms the important role that LAFCOs play in California in serving as an arm of the State, not only in the oversight of local government boundaries, but in evaluating and guiding the efficient, cost-effective, and reliable delivery of municipal services to California’s citizenry. AB 2838 expanded the powers and duties of LAFCO, in its decision-making role in government organization changes, and its examination and guidance of municipal service location and extension timing. The CKH Act provides the framework for proposed city and special district annexations, incorporations/formations, consolidations, and other changes of organization.
This law establishes a LAFCO in each county, empowering it to review, approve, or deny proposals for boundary changes and incorporations/formations for cities, counties, and special districts.
LAFCOs are composed of elected officials from the county and local cities, and a member of the general public. As of 2011, 29 of the 58 LAFCOs also have special district representation. In addition, some LAFCOs have special membership pursuant to the CKH Act.
The State delegates each LAFCO the power to review
and approve with or without amendment, wholly, partially, or conditionally, or disapprove proposed annexations,
reorganizations, and incorporations, consistent with
written policies, procedures, and guidelines adopted by the commission. In granting these powers, the State has occupied the field of annexation law to the exclusion of local legislation. Therefore, a city or county cannot take actions which hinder or conflict with State annexation procedures.
For this reason, a city cannot adopt a local ordinance which would allow city voters to pass sole judgment on proposed annexation proceedings (Ferrini v. City of San Luis Obispo (1983) 150 Cal.App.3d 239 and L.I.F.E. v. City of Lodi (1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 1139). A city also cannot circumvent annexation law or the LAFCO process and cannot provide new or extended services outside its jurisdictional boundaries unless approved by LAFCO under specified circumstances (Section 56133).
Each LAFCO operates independently of the State and of local government agencies. However, LAFCO is expected to act within a set of State-mandated parameters encouraging “planned, well-ordered, efficient urban development patterns,” the preservation of open-space lands, and the discouragement of urban sprawl. The Legislature has taken Best Practice Tip #1
If you have a controversial or complicated
annexation proposal, talk to the LAFCO executive
officer about “Terms and Conditions.” LAFCO has
broad authority to impose Terms and Conditions
on annexations that can guide or influence which
agency does what, where, when, and how as part of
the annexation. Cities and other stakeholders can
work with LAFCO to craft Terms and Conditions
that address potential barriers to annexations.
Agenda Packet Page 153
4 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
care to guide the actions of the LAFCOs by providing Statewide policies and priorities (Section 56301), and by establishing criteria for the delineation of spheres of influence (SOIs) (Section 56425).
Agenda Packet Page 154
5 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
Local Government Role in Planning and
Regulating Land Use
Local governments have the primary responsibility for planning and regulation of land uses. State law requires each city and county to prepare and adopt a “comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development” of the community. This general plan must cover all incorporated territory and should go beyond the city limits to include “any land outside its boundaries which ...bears relation to its planning” (Section 65300).
A city’s general plan is an important statement of the city’s future intent. It allows city officials to indicate to State agencies, local governments, and the public their concerns for the future of surrounding unincorporated lands. Since the general plan is a policy document with a long-term perspective, it may logically include adjacent territory the city ultimately expects to annex or to serve, as well as any area which is of particular interest to the city. The city’s SOI (which is established by the LAFCO) describes its probable physical boundaries and service area and can therefore be used as a benchmark for the maximum extent of the city’s future service area. The city may choose to plan for land uses beyond its SOI when coordinating plans with those of other jurisdictions (2003 General Plan Guidelines).
Through legislation and case law, the general plan has assumed the status of the “constitution for all future development” (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553). As a result, most local land use decision-making now requires consistency with the general plan. The same is true of public works projects (Friends of B Street v. City of Hayward (1980) 106 Cal.App.3d 988) and, in several cases, voter zoning initiatives (Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek (1990) 52 Cal.3d 531 and Goleta, supra).
Senate Bill 244 (Chapter 514, Statutes 2011, Wolk) amended general plan statutes to include planning for unincorporated disadvantaged communities. Cities, on or before the due date for the next adoption of its housing element, must review and update the land use element of their general plans to include the identification of unincorporated island or fringe communities within the city’s SOI, and to analyze for each identified community:
(1) “water, wastewater, stormwater drainage, and structural fire protection needs or deficiencies”; and (2) “benefit assessment districts or other financing alternatives that could make the extension of services to identified communities financially feasible” (Section 65302.10). SB 244 is discussed further in the “Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities” section of this publication.
Agenda Packet Page 155
6 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
Annexations
Annexation is the means by which an existing city extends its corporate boundaries. In its most basic form, annexation can be considered a five-part process. The steps are generally outlined below. Please refer to the flowchart on page 23 for a visual outline of the process.
Pre-Application
An application may be filed with the LAFCO by
petition of affected landowners or registered voters, or by resolution from the involved city. Prior to filing, the proponent should meet with the LAFCO executive
officer to establish the minimum requirements for
processing, and then meet with any affected special
districts and agencies to agree upon a taxation scheme
and needed property tax transfers. Unless determined
to be statutorily or categorically exempt from CEQA,
LAFCO’s action is considered a “project” that is
subject to CEQA review, and an initial study will be
required. The CKH Act requires prezoning of the site
by the affected city. This usually makes the city the
“lead agency” for CEQA documents and the LAFCO
a “responsible agency.” The city should coordinate with the LAFCO early on in the application process to
ensure LAFCO’s action on the annexation is adequately
covered by the CEQA document. In most cases, the
city (or the private proponent) will be responsible
for preparing the initial study and the environmental
document with LAFCO input.
Application Filing and Processing
LAFCO has 30 days to review an annexation application and determine that it is complete for processing, or notify the applicant that the application is not complete. If an annexation application also includes the detachment of territory from a city or annexation to a special district, LAFCO must follow special procedures that provide the detaching city or annexing special district the opportunity to request termination of the proceedings by resolution (Sections 56751 and 56857). LAFCO must honor the request. When a local agency initiates annexation by resolution of application, it must submit a plan for providing services. At a minimum, the plan must address the type, level, range, timing, and financing of services to be extended, including requirements for infrastructure or other public facilities. Before the executive officer issues a certificate of filing, the involved city, county, and affected special districts are required to negotiate the allocation of property tax revenues during a 60-day mandatory negotiation period, unless extended to 90 days (Revenue & Taxation Code Section 99 and 71 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 344 (1988)). If an agreement is not reached, Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(e)(1) outlines an alternative negotiation, mediation, and arbitration process that is required by statute.
Best Practice Tip #2
Meet with the LAFCO executive officer as early as
possible to discuss the annexation proposal, identify
potential political, financial, or procedural “red flags,” and understand the local LAFCO’s application requirements.
Section 56652 gives LAFCO broad authority to require
data and information as part of the application. While
application requirements vary between LAFCOs, typical
application requirements include:
t "QQMJDBUJPOGPSN
t 'JMJOHBOE1SPDFTTJOH'FFT
t $&2"BOEQSF[POJOHEPDVNFOUBUJPO
t .BQBOENFUFTBOECPVOETMFHBMEFTDSJQUJPO
t 1MBO GPSQSPWJEJOHTFSWJDFT SFRVJSFECZ4FDUJPO
56653)
t 1SPQFSUZUBYFYDIBOHFSFTPMVUJPOT
t "TTPDJBUFE40*BNFOENFOUT
JGSFRVJSFE
Agenda Packet Page 156
7 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
The law does not require they reach agreement at the end of this process. Nonetheless, if the city and county cannot reach an agreement on the exchange of property tax, an impasse will stall or could terminate the process (Greenwood Addition Homeowners Association v. City of San Marino (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 1360). Without an agreement, the executive officer is prohibited from issuing a certificate of filing which is a precondition to LAFCO’s consideration of an application for annexation; the application cannot proceed.
Once the application has been accepted as complete, the executive officer will issue a certificate of filing and set the proposal for commission consideration within 90 days. During the application process, LAFCO will work with the applicant and affected agencies to analyze the proposed annexation in light of the commission’s State mandated evaluation criteria (Section 56668) and responsibilities, and its own locally adopted policies and procedures.
LAFCO Review and Consideration
LAFCO may approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed annexation. LAFCO cannot disapprove an annexation if it meets certain requirements (Section 56375(a)(4), including “island annexations” that are 150 acres or fewer in size (Section 56375.3). However, only in the latter case are protests required to be waived, if all criteria are met. The lead agency, whether it is the LAFCO or the involved city, must comply with CEQA requirements prior to the LAFCO’s action. Within 30 days of the LAFCO’s resolution, any person or affected agency may file a written request with the executive officer for reconsideration of the annexation proposal based on new or different facts that could not have been presented previously (Section 56895).
Protest Proceedings
Unless waived pursuant to Section 56375.3 as an island annexation, or in cases where landowners have provided written consent (56663)(a)(c) or have not objected after receiving notice of the commission’s intent to waive protest proceedings (56663)(d), LAFCO, acting as the “conducting authority” in accordance with the requirements of the CKH Act, will hold a public protest hearing to determine whether the proposed annexation must be terminated, or approved with or without an election, to determine the proposal’s outcome.
For annexations of inhabited territory (containing 12 or more registered voters), LAFCO must: 1) Terminate the proceedings if it receives protests from 50 percent or more of the registered voters within the territory; 2) Order the annexation subject to an election if it receives protests from either at least 25 percent, but less than 50 percent, of the registered voters residing in the affected territory or from at least 25 percent of the number of owners of land who also own at least 25 percent of the assessed value of land within the affected territory; or, 3) Order the annexation without an election if it receives protests from less than 25 percent of the registered voters or less than 25 percent of the number of owners of land owning less than 25 percent of the assessed value of land within the affected territory.
For annexations of uninhabited territory (containing fewer than 12 registered voters), the LAFCO must: 1) Terminate Best Practice Tip #3
Annexation attempts can fail if the affected
city and county cannot reach agreement on
a property tax split. In the early planning
stages, the applicant should ascertain if a
master property tax exchange agreement
exists between the affected city and the
county, and if there are concerns about
the likelihood of a property tax exchange
agreement. Property tax exchange
agreements can be structured to address
fiscal and related issues.
Best Practice Tip #4
There are examples around the State
of annexations that have involved preannexation agreements and development agreements by cities, counties, and
landowners/developers that align the
timing and structure of the annexation
process relative to the city and/or county
entitlement and development phasing
process.
Agenda Packet Page 157
8 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
the proceedings if it receives protests from landowners owning 50 percent or more of the assessed value of the land within the territory; or, 2) Order the change of organization or reorganization if it receives protests from owners of land who own less than 50 percent of the total assessed value of land within the affected territory. If the proposal is terminated, the executive officer will issue a certificate of termination of proceedings and no new annexation may be proposed on the site for at least one year, unless the LAFCO waives the limitation upon finding that the limitation is detrimental to the public interest (Section 57090). When an election is required, registered voters residing within the affected territory are entitled to vote on the issue of annexation (Section 57142).
Final Certification
When the LAFCO executive officer is satisfied that all elements of the CKH Act have been properly addressed, and that all conditions have been met, the executive officer will issue a certificate of completion. The annexation is not complete until it has been certified by the executive officer (Section 57200). The commission may establish an “effective date” for the annexation. Alternatively, the effective date will be the date the certificate of completion is recorded by the County Recorder (Section 57202). Once the annexation is recorded, there is no administrative recourse except by legal challenge.
Agenda Packet Page 158
9 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
Consistent Annexations
State law does not mandate that annexations conform to local general plans beyond requiring that “the decision of the [LAFCO] commission with regard to a proposal to annex territory to a city shall be based upon the general plan and prezoning of the city” (56375)(a)(7). However, the commission will also consider “consistency with the city or county general and specific plans” when appropriate (Section 56668(g)). Nonetheless, the statutes contain numerous references that attempt to link local land use and open-space policies, including Williamson Act contracts, to the annexation process (Sections 56300, 56375, 56377, 56425). Accordingly, the commission should attempt to harmonize local planning policies with the intent of the State legislation. Where there is a clear conflict, such as incompatibility between city and county general plans, the State precepts should prevail.
The factors that the LAFCO must consider in reviewing annexation proposals include, but are not limited to, the following (Section 56668):
a) Population and population density; land area and land use; per capita assessed valuation; topography, natural boundaries, and drainage basins; proximity to other populated areas; the likelihood of significant growth in the area, and in adjacent incorporated and unincorporated areas, during the next 10 years.
b) The need for organized community services; the present cost and adequacy of governmental services and controls in the area; probable future needs for those services and controls; probable effect of the proposed incorporation, formation, annexation, or exclusion and of alternative courses of action on the cost and adequacy of services and controls in the area and adjacent areas.
c) The effect of the proposed action and of alternative actions, on adjacent areas, on mutual social and economic interests, and on the local governmental structure of the county.
d) The conformity of both the proposal and its anticipated effects with both the adopted commission policies on providing planned, orderly, efficient patterns of urban development, and the policies and priorities in Section 56377.
e) The effect of the proposal on maintaining the physical and economic integrity of agricultural lands, as defined by Section 56016.
f ) The definiteness and certainty of the boundaries of the territory, the nonconformance of proposed boundaries with lines of assessment or ownership, the creation of islands or corridors of unincorporated territory, and other similar matters affecting the proposed boundaries. g) A regional transportation plan adopted pursuant to Section 65080, and its consistency with city or county general and specific plans.
h) The SOI of any local agency which may be applicable to the proposal being reviewed.
Best Practice Tip #5
As of 2008, LAFCOs must consider
regional transportation plans and
sustainable communities strategies (SB
375, Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008);
the timely availability of water supplies;
regional housing needs assessment
(RHNA) allocations; and the promotion
of environmental justice. Check with
your LAFCO for local policies and
procedures that may exist to address
these factors and others listed in Section
56668. It is also good practice to include
LAFCO consideration of these factors
in the lead agency’s CEQA document.
Agenda Packet Page 159
10 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
i) The comments of any affected local agency or other public agency. j) The ability of the newly formed or receiving entity to provide the services which are the subject of the application to the area, including the sufficiency of revenues for those services following the proposed boundary change.
k) Timely availability of water supplies adequate for projected needs as specified in Section 65352.5. l) The extent to which the proposal will affect a city or cities, and the county in achieving their respective fair shares of the regional housing needs as determined by the appropriate council of governments consistent with Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7. m) Any information or comments from the landowner or owners, voters, or residents of the affected territory. n) Any information relating to existing land use designations. o) The extent to which the proposal will promote environmental justice. As used in this subdivision, “environmental justice” means the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the location of public facilities and the provision of public services.
Island Annexations
Under Government Code Section 56375(a)(4), a LAFCO is required to approve a city’s request to annex land adjacent to its borders when the commission finds that any of the following circumstances exist:
a) The land is substantially surrounded by the
city or the Pacific Ocean, is substantially
developed or developing, is not prime
agricultural land, is designated for urban
growth in the city’s general plan, and is not
within the SOI of another city.
b) The land is located within an urban service
area designated by the LAFCO, is not
prime agricultural land, and is designated
for urban growth in the city’s general plan.
c) The land meets the criteria for
unincorporated islands under Section
56375.3.
Island annexations under Section 56375.3 must be
approved by LAFCO, with or without terms and
conditions, and protest proceedings must be waived.
This special provision was added to the CorteseKnox Act in 2000 with the passage of AB 1555 (Chapter 921, Statutes of 1999), a bill sponsored
by the League of California Cities to streamline
Best Practice Tip #6
Before proceeding with a small island annexation, verify the effective sunset date of Section 56375.3. The current sunset date is January 1, 2014.
Best Practice Tip #7
The Attorney General has opined that, for annexations
that include protest procedures, such procedures satisfy the voter approval requirements of Proposition 218 where the annexation is conditioned on a tax, assessment or fee being extended to the affected territory (82 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 180 (1999)). To date, however, there has been no Attorney General Opinion or court decision on whether the voter requirements of Proposition 218 apply to small island annexations under Section 56375.3, for which protest proceedings are expressly waived. Before proceeding with a small island annexation, talk to your local LAFCO executive officer about the application of Proposition 218 to your proposal.
Agenda Packet Page 160
11 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
“small island annexations” (islands 150 acres or less) that are in the interest of the public welfare. The bill included a “sunset” date for these special provisions. The sunset date was previously extended by the Legislature. The current sunset date is January 1, 2014.
Best Practice Tip #8
Talk to your local LAFCO executive officer
about local policies or procedures the
LAFCO may have adopted to address the
implementation of legislative changes to the
CKH Act, like SB 244 (Wolk, 2011).
Agenda Packet Page 161
12 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities
On October 7, 2011, Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr. signed SB 244 (Wolk) into law (Chapter 513, Statutes of 2011) making changes to the CKH Act related to “disadvantaged unincorporated communities.” The legislative intent of this law is “to encourage investment in these communities and address the complex legal, financial, and political barriers that contribute to regional inequity and infrastructure deficits” within them. A disadvantaged unincorporated community is defined in the CKH Act (Section 56033.5) as “inhabited territory…or as determined by commission policy, that constitutes all or a portion of a disadvantaged community as defined by Section 79505.5 of the Water Code,” which states, “a community with an annual median household income that is less than 80 percent of the Statewide annual median household income.” SB 244 made several changes to the CKH Act:
1. It prohibits LAFCO from approving an annexation to a city of any territory greater than 10 acres, or as determined by commission policy, where there exists a disadvantaged unincorporated community that is contiguous to the proposed annexation area unless an application to annex the disadvantaged unincorporated community to the subject city has been filed with the LAFCO. However, an application to annex a contiguous disadvantaged unincorporated community is not required if a prior application for annexation of the same community has been made within the preceding five years or if the commission finds that a majority of residents of the community are opposed to annexation.
2. For an update of a sphere of influence of a city or district that provides public facilities or services related to sewers, municipal and industrial water, or structural fire protection that occurs after July 1, 2012, LAFCO must consider the present and probable need for public facilities and services of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities within the existing sphere of influence. The commission may assess the feasibility of governmental reorganization of agencies to further the goals of orderly development and efficient and affordable service delivery.
3. LAFCO must include, in its statement of written determinations of municipal service reviews considerations relating to disadvantaged unincorporated communities within or contiguous to an agency’s sphere of influence.
Agenda Packet Page 162
13 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
Spheres of Influence and
Municipal Service Reviews
Spheres of Influence
LAFCOs exercise both regulatory and planning functions. While annexations are a regulatory act, LAFCOs’ major planning task is the establishment, periodic review, and update of SOIs for the various governmental bodies within their jurisdictions. As described by Section 56076, the SOI is “a plan for the probable physical boundaries and service area of a local government agency as determined by the commission.” In establishing, amending, or updating a SOI, a LAFCO must consider and make written determinations with regard to the following factors (Section 56425(e)):
1. The present and planned uses in the area, including agricultural and open-space lands.
2. The present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area.
3. The present capacity of public facilities and the adequacy of public services that the agency provides or is authorized to provide.
4. The existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area if the commission determines that they are relevant to the agency.
5. For an update of a sphere of influence of a city or special district that provides public facilities or services related to sewers, municipal and industrial water, or structural fire protection, that occurs on or after July 1, 2012, the present and probable need for those public facilities and services of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities within the existing sphere of influence (SB 244 (Chapter 513, Statutes of 2011)).
The SOI is an important benchmark because it defines the primary area within which urban development is to be encouraged (Section 56425). In a 1977 opinion, the California Attorney General stated that an agency’s SOI should “serve like general plans, serve as an essential planning tool to combat urban sprawl and provide well planned efficient urban development patterns, giving appropriate consideration to preserving prime agricultural and other open-space lands” (60 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 118). Like general plans, SOIs may be reviewed and updated from time to time, or upon request by any person or local agency. SOIs may also be reviewed and updated following significant changes in regional or State policy that may affect an existing SOI, such as the adoption of a Sustainable Communities Strategy consistent with Senate Bill 375 (Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008).The CKH Act provides that every five years, LAFCO shall, as necessary, review and update each local agency’s SOI under LAFCO jurisdiction.
The California Appellate Court holds that SOIs must be adopted before an annexation to the affected city or district can be considered. (Resource Defense Fund v. LAFCO (1983) 138 Cal.App.3d 987). Depending on local policy, some LAFCOs consider SOI amendments and associated annexations separately. Section 56427 requires LAFCO to send notice of pending annexation hearings to those affected agencies whose SOIs contain territory within the proposal.
LAFCO has sole responsibility for establishing a city’s SOI. For cities with territory in more than one county, the LAFCO in the county having the greater portion of the entire assessed value of all taxable property within the Agenda Packet Page 163
14 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
city has exclusive jurisdiction to determine the city’s SOI and conduct municipal service reviews (Placer County LAFCO v. Nevada County LAFCO (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 793). Further, the LAFCO is not required to establish an SOI that is greater than the city’s existing boundaries. LAFCO may take joint action to approve an annexation while at the same time amending the city’s SOI. (City of Agoura Hills v. LAFCO (1988) 198 Cal.App.3d 480).
LAFCO officials and local decision-makers recognize the logical assumption that the lands lying within the SOI are those that the city may someday propose to annex. If the city finds that annexing an area outside its SOI would be in the public interest, it should first request that its SOI be amended to include that area.
City-County Coordination in Spheres of Influence
Counties possess sole land use jurisdiction over
unincorporated territory whether located outside
or inside of a city’s SOI. When the Legislature
passed AB 2838, it recognized that, as the future
service provider of unincorporated land in a
city’s SOI, the city should have an opportunity to
address how land in the SOI is planned for and
developed in anticipation of future annexation.
This has both physical and fiscal ramifications
for cities as future service providers. Before a city
submits an application to LAFCO to update its
SOI, the city and county shall meet in an effort to
reach agreement on the SOI boundaries and the
development standards and planning and zoning
requirements within the SOI (Section 56425(b)).
Under a separate but related provision of the CKH Act, LAFCO has the authority to review and comment on the extension of services into previously unserved, unincorporated territory, whether inside or outside of a city’s SOI, including the creation of new service providers to extend “urban type development” into previously unserved, unincorporated territory (Section 56434). This provision of the CKH Act is scheduled to sunset on January 1, 2013.
Municipal Service Reviews
Another major change to LAFCO law from AB 2838
was the requirement for LAFCO to conduct municipal
service reviews (MSRs) before or in conjunction with the establishment or update of SOIs (Section 56430). MSRs are conducted by geographic area or countywide and include a comprehensive review of all agencies that provide the services LAFCO identifies. As part of its review, LAFCO can evaluate alternatives for improving efficiency and affordability of infrastructure and service delivery. LAFCO is required to make seven written determinations for MSRs:
Best Practice Tip #9
The CKH Act encourages collaboration among LAFCOs,
cities, counties, landowners, and other local agencies to balance the timing and location of development within SOIs, including the establishment of SOIs in concert with long-range land use planning and annexations in concert with development entitlements and the extension of services. This is consistent with the legislative intent of the CKH Act to promote orderly development, discourage urban sprawl, preserve open space and prime agricultural lands, provide housing for persons and families of all incomes, and encourage the efficient extension of governmental services.
Best Practice Tip #10
If your city is preparing or updating a general
plan, housing element, utilities master plan, or
major facilities expansion that might affect your
city’s SOI or service delivery operations, consider
coordinating early on with the LAFCO executive
officer to share data and analysis related to MSRs.
Agenda Packet Page 164
15 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
1. Growth and population projections for the affected area.
2. The location and characteristics of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities within or contiguous to the sphere of influence.
3. Present and planned capacity of public facilities, adequacy of public services, and infrastructure needs or deficiencies including needs or deficiencies related to sewers, municipal and industrial water, and structural fire protection in any disadvantaged, unincorporated communities within or contiguous to the sphere of influence.
4. Financial ability of agencies to provide services.
5. Status of, and opportunities for, shared facilities.
6. Accountability for community service needs, including governmental structure and operational efficiencies.
7. Any other matter related to effective or efficient service delivery, as required by commission policy.
A major benefit of MSRs to local agencies is the creation and maintenance by LAFCO of countywide data as it relates to the seven MSR determinations. For more information about MSRs, please refer to OPR’s 2003 publication, LAFCO Municipal Service Review Guidelines.
Agenda Packet Page 165
16 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
Prezoning
A city must prezone unincorporated territory that the city expects to annex in the future, or present evidence satisfactory to LAFCO that the existing development entitlements on the territory are vested or are already at buildout and are consistent with the city’s general plan. The proposed zoning must be consistent with the city general plan and a public hearing must be held. LAFCO may not, however, dictate the specific zoning to be applied by the city.
There are two advantages to prezoning. First, the city will have zoning in effect immediately upon annexation. Local residents will thereby have prior knowledge of the land use regulations that would affect them should annexation occur. Second, prezoning serves as notice to the LAFCO of the city’s intentions regarding its adjacent areas. As such, upon annexation of the territory, the city is restricted for a period of two years after the annexation’s effective date from amending the general plan designation and zoning for the territory that is a departure from the prezoning.
This restriction may be waived if the city makes a finding at a public hearing that a substantial change has occurred in circumstances that necessitates a departure from the prezoning.
In order to be effective, the prezoning must be consistent with the city general plan. In at least one instance, the Appellate Court upheld a LAFCO’s authority to deny an annexation where a city had prezoned a site agricultural, but where the “ultimate intended use” as represented on the general plan was residential and industrial. The conversion to agricultural land had conflicted with adopted LAFCO policy. (City of Santa Clara v. LAFCO (1983) 139 Cal.
App.3d 923).
Agenda Packet Page 166
17 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
Environmental Review
Both case law and the CEQA Guidelines support the applicability of CEQA to annexations and to related SOI amendments. The environmental document should be prepared early in the process and should address all aspects of the project, not merely the annexation.
In 1975, the California Supreme Court held in a Ventura County case that annexations are to be considered projects under CEQA and are subject to environmental analysis. Where the LAFCO had “proceeded as if CEQA did not exist” its decision was enjoined until an EIR could be prepared. The Supreme Court drew similarities between the purposes of CEQA and the annexation laws then in effect, requiring that the LAFCO harmonize these purposes through the preparation of an EIR (Bozung v. LAFCO (1975) 13 Cal.3d 263).
The CEQA Guidelines define a project as the whole
of an action, not the separate governmental actions
that may be necessary to complete it. Ideally, a single environmental document will be prepared to address
the annexation as well as all related general plan
amendments, prezoning, SOI, or other proposals. The
CEQA document should include an evaluation of the
environmental effects from future development of the
affected annexation territory based on what would be
allowed under the existing or proposed general plan
and zoning provisions. The document should address,
among other concerns, the policy issues raised in Sections 56301 and 56375. If the EIR identifies one or more significant environmental impacts and the annexation is approved, the LAFCO and the city will be responsible for making findings pursuant to Sections 15091 and 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines justifying their actions.
The courts have had differing opinions over the application of CEQA to SOI determinations. In City of Livermore v.
LAFCO (1986) 183 Cal.App.3d 531, the court held that CEQA was invoked when the Alameda County LAFCO changed the guidelines it used for determining SOIs. However, the court in City of Agoura Hills v. LAFCO (1988) 198 Cal.App.3d 480 concluded that establishing an SOI was not automatically a project under CEQA. According to Agoura Hills v. LAFCO, the Court held that, “the fact that SOIs are recognized as important factors in annexations does not compel the conclusion that they are per se ‘projects’ subject to CEQA.” The Agoura court did not dismiss the possibility that under other circumstances, an SOI determination could be a project.
Environmental documents prepared for annexations should also address all related prezonings or general plan amendments (Bozung v. LAFCO, supra; Pistoresi v. City of Madera (1982) 138 Cal.App.3d 284). Conversely, when prezoning is proposed the environmental document should discuss the effects of annexation. For example, in Rural Landowners Association v. City Council (1983) 143 Cal.App.3d 1013, the court held that an EIR prepared for a prezoning and general plan amendment was insufficient because it failed to consider the issue of the related annexation that was then in progress. Amending the SOI may also be subject to CEQA if significant effects are possible (63 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 758 (1980)). The city proposing an annexation must provide the LAFCO sufficient information to satisfy the environmental analysis requirements (City of Santa Clara v. LAFCO, supra).
Best Practice Tip #11
If your project may directly or indirectly trigger the
need for future LAFCO approval (e.g., annexations or
SOI amendments), coordinate CEQA review early on
with the LAFCO executive officer to ensure the CEQA
document adequately addresses LAFCO’s requirements
as a responsible agency. Future LAFCO actions should
be clearly identified in the project description and list of approvals required by other agencies.
Agenda Packet Page 167
18 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
When prezoning is proposed as part of an annexation request, the city is deemed the lead agency for CEQA purposes (Section 15051 of the CEQA Guidelines). As lead agency, the city will be responsible for preparing the necessary environmental document.
Local agencies, which can use categorical exemptions under the CEQA Guidelines for annexations, should use them carefully. If the annexation will result in extending utilities beyond the level required to serve existing development,the categorical exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15319 cannot be employed (Pistoresi v. City of Madera, supra; City of Santa Clara v. LAFCO, supra). Use of Section 15319 is limited to when: (1) development already exists at the density allowed by the current zoning or prezoning; (2) the utilities which may be required for the ultimate use will not serve more than the development in existence at the time of annexation; and (3) the annexation consists of individual small parcels of the minimum size for those facilities which are included in Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Agenda Packet Page 168
19 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
Summary
This summarizes the preceding points:
1. General Plan Consistency
Annexations should be part of the community’s comprehensive plan for the community’s future. Annexation should occur in an orderly and logical manner, consistent with both the city general plan and with State mandates, regarding service delivery and the conservation of agricultural and open-space lands.
If the annexation area has not been included or addressed in the city general plan, then an amendment to the plan should be considered. When evaluating the proposal for consistency with the plan, special consideration should be given to the annexation’s impacts on existing and planned public services, agricultural and open-space lands, city housing supplies for all economic levels, and the adopted SOI.
2. Sphere of Influence
If the area proposed for annexation lies outside of the city’s SOI, then a request to amend the city’s SOI must occur prior to or concurrent with filing the annexation request with the LAFCO. The SOI proposal should be addressed in the environmental document.
3. Environmental Analysis
The environmental document prepared for the annexation should be comprehensive in scope. That is, necessary rezoning and related applications should be evaluated as part of the project even though they may not be under consideration for some time. It should be possible to use a single environmental document to address the whole project, including any SOI amendments and/or annexations involving cities and/or special districts.
4. Prezoning
Prior to annexation, the site should be prezoned to be consistent with the city general plan. Prezoning hearings can alert the city to opposition or to issues of particular concern prior to the filing of an application with the LAFCO.
The prezoning, general plan amendment (if necessary), and comprehensive environmental document should be completed before the annexation proposal is submitted to the LAFCO for consideration. When prezoning is involved, the city is the lead agency for purposes of CEQA.
5. LAFCO Application
When the city initiates an annexation, it should provide the LAFCO with as much information about the project as possible. This would include general plan, prezoning, environmental analysis data, and the plan for providing services.
If the environmental document prepared for prezoning or general plan amendment proposal is comprehensive, the LAFCO should be able to use it for the annexation, thereby streamlining the process. Annexation proponents should meet with the LAFCO executive officer prior to filing an application, in order to review the LAFCO application requirements.
Agenda Packet Page 169
20 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
6. Public Review
The city should encourage public review and comment at every stage of the process. While the CKH Act provides opportunities for review at the LAFCO and city hearing levels, the general plan and prezoning procedures offer additional opportunities for input. Early public response is helpful in assessing public sentiment and identifying areas of concern.
City hearings should be coordinated if feasible. Addressing more than one topic at each hearing may clarify the intent and the ramifications of the overall project. Candidates for combined city hearings are: prezoning and general plan amendment; and prezoning, general plan, and resolution of application initiating proceedings. Ask the involved LAFCO whether it is possible to combine hearings.
At the same time, both city and LAFCO hearings can be educational. They offer an opportunity to explain annexation procedures and the responsibilities of the city and the LAFCO. For example, residents are sometimes confused about the implications of annexations to property taxes, or the ability of a city, under certain circumstances, to annex territory without an election (Section 56375(d)). When appropriate, invite the LAFCO executive officer to city hearings on annexations or related city actions to address frequently asked questions about the process or effects of annexations.
Agenda Packet Page 170
21 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
Conclusion
Both the city and the LAFCO have a responsibility to see that the proposed expansion of corporate limits complies with the procedures laid out in the CKH Act, adopted LAFCO policies, and the two State policies iterated at the beginning of this publication. It is important that the city and the LAFCO coordinate the annexation process through cooperation and mutual discussion. When considering the annexation proposal, both the city and the LAFCO should look beyond the immediate and examine the future impacts of the total project on city services, sources of tax revenue, historic growth trends, and neighboring communities and cities. LAFCOs can provide cities with a great deal of information about the annexation process and the enabling legislation.
Agenda Packet Page 171
22 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
Table of Cases Cited
Bozung v. LAFCO
(1975) 13 Cal.3d 263
Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553
City of Agoura Hills v. LAFCO
(1988) 198 Cal.App.3d 480
City of Livermore v. LAFCO
(1986) 183 Cal.App.3d 531
City of Santa Clara v. LAFCO
(1983) 139 Cal.App.3d 923
Ferrini v. City of San Luis Obispo
(1983) 150 Cal.App.3d 239
Friends of B Street v. City of Hayward
(1980) 106 Cal.App.3d 988
Greenwood Addition Homeowners Association v. City of San Marino (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 1360
Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek
(1990) 52 Cal.3d 531
L.I.F.E. v. Lodi
(1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 1139
Pistoresi v. City of Madera
(1982) 138 Cal.App.3d 284
Resource Defense Fund v. LAFCO
(1983) 138 Cal.App.3d 987
Rural Landowners Association v. City Council
(1983) 143 Cal.App.3d 1013
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
60 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen 118 (1977)
63 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen 758 (1980)
71 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen 344 (1988)
82 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 180 (1999)
Agenda Packet Page 172
23 LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations
Annexation Process Flowchart
Agenda Packet Page 173
Printed on Recycled Paper
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 22, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Regina Cave, General Services Director
Leslie Blomquist, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Considerations and Options for Pavement Restoration Strategies Summary and Recommendation
At the May 10, 2022 Strategic Planning Meeting, the City Council established an objective to evaluate options for pavement and restoration strategies. This staff report is intended to serve as a discussion item for the City Council’s consideration and opportunity for the Council to provide direction.
Staff recommends Council review the staff report, receive a staff presentation and provide direction to staff to proceed with developing long term planning of citywide pavement restoration plans.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact related to this action. Project funds will continue to be programmed on a two-year cycle consistent with the City’s budget process. As the City approaches revenue neutrality and Council elects to allocate general fund dollars to support the city’s street repair efforts, those funds will be allocated towards projects that align with Council’s goal of improving the city’s overall pavement conditions. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23, the City is forecasted to spend an estimated $2,900,000 in street repairs from five non-General Fund sources. The City’s long-range budget forecasting model projects increasing street repairs by $2,000,000 in FY 2023-24 and to $4,000,000 starting in FY 2024-25 going forward using General Fund dollars. This is expanded upon later in the staff report.
Background and Analysis
In 2019, Council authorized an agreement to update the City’s pavement management system (PMS).
The system currently in place (Streetsaver) is widely used throughout the industry to more accurately track real-time conditions of public infrastructure, including pavement, sidewalks, striping, signage, and other safety amenities. The purpose of updating the PMS was and is to help provide better tools to understand not only the condition of the City’s assets but also for planning and strategizing how to better maximize staff’s efforts when it comes to preventative maintenance of streets. Attached is a current list of the City’s maintained streets with assigned Pavement Condition Index (PCI).
Item 14 Agenda Packet Page 174
Subject: Considerations and Options for Pavement Restoration Strategies Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
The City’s existing network of streets includes a mixture of residential, collector and arterial roadways.
The data maintained in the PMS is updated regularly and upon completion of capital projects that alter or improve pavement conditions. As a network, the city’s PCI averages 51, and has declined by 3 points since the PMS update in 2019. Historically, streets selected for street resurfacing have typically been residential classifications and with lower PCI’s, with many of these streets serving lower traffic volumes. This approach has been largely based on limited available funding resources for road projects in general, as well as project locations that do not qualify for federal or state grants, including all residential streets. Current funding sources available to support the City’s resurfacing program include Gas Tax, Measure A Maintenance, and SB1 Funds, which are an extension of the Gas Tax program. In June 2022, a Mid-Cycle Update provided to Council included a 10-Year Financial Forecast, tentatively allocating general funds to annual street repairs beginning in Fiscal Year 2023/2024.
In recognizing the challenges the City has with an extensive maintenance backlog, not just with pavement but with various transportation assets, it is necessary to re-evaluate the City’s approach to road repairs and prioritization of streets. Under the current model used by the City, road repairs and repaving is prioritized by streets with the lowest Pavement Condition Index (PCI) often resulting in courts and neighborhood streets receiving the greatest focus. As discussed at the most recent Strategic Planning Retreat, City Council and staff feel that this strategy should be reevaluated to consider approaches to ensure infrastructure maintenance investments are experienced by a greater number of residents and business district customers. By strategizing infrastructure maintenance projects geographically or by roadways that are experienced by more users rather than by lowest PCI, the City can deliver projects more efficiently, increase coordination with other stakeholders, address roads that serve more users and maximize use of City funds. This shift in approach would also look to focus a significant amount of available dollars on addressing arterials and collectors that may not necessarily be viable candidates for federal or state grants.
The data contained within the city’s PMS includes varying pavement restoration applications to addressing pavement conditions. Recommendations of how to address each street is specific to the PCI, which is dynamic and changes as time passes and the conditions of the pavement worsen. By addressing the City’s roads systematically to include preventative maintenance and not limiting projects to just full reconstruction, staff can work on extending the life of streets in a more fiscally responsible approach.
The following table is an estimate of available and eligible funds for the next five years beginning in FY 2023/2024, noting that several of these funding sources have specific criteria on how the funds can be utilized, such as Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for improvements within specific target areas or in conjunction with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) facilities:
Agenda Packet Page 175
Subject: Considerations and Options for Pavement Restoration Strategies Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
Funding
Source
FY 2023/2024 FY 2024/2025 FY 2025/2026 FY 2026/2027 FY 2027/2028 CDBG $360,000 $360,000 $360,000 $360,000 $360,000
Gas Tax $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000
General Funds $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 Measure A $500,000 $500,000 $550,000 $550,000 $600,000
SB1 $1,900,000 $2,000,000 $2,100,000 $2,200,000 $2,300,000 Stormwater
Utility Funds
$250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000
Total
Estimate:
$5,410,000 $7,510,000 $7,660,000 $7,760,000 $7,910,000
The estimates provided above are conservative estimates of future revenues. It is important to note that while these funds have generally supported resurfacing and complete streets projects, they do not necessarily reflect funding available for just pavement restoration projects. Based upon anticipated future grant funded projects, some of the above noted funding sources will be needed to augment various capital projects, either as matching funds and/or additional contributing funds as project delivery approaches. Such anticipated projects may include but are not San Juan Complete Streets and Old Auburn Road Complete Streets, both of which are planned for delivery in the next five years.
New Strategic Pavement Approach for City Council Discussion and Consideration The approach outlined in this section of the staff report would be a new alternative that serves as a more strategically focused approach to street infrastructure than the current model provides for. The proposed approach would result in more road miles paved or maintained at a higher standard as arterials and collectors would receive more focus than they do under the current model.
As staff works to focus on a project delivery approach that achieves balance with all modes of transportation, improves safety around schools and high traffic areas, and supports the City’s vital commercial and business districts, the following are points for Council’s discussion and consideration, with the intent on developing as a five year deliverable plan:
• Program 50% or more of available annual funds to address pavement, safety and accessibility along arterials and collectors that are not foreseeably considered for competitive grant funding. • Program remaining funds on residential streets, strategizing by districts or grouped Neighborhood Associations within districts to concentrate efforts, maximize use of funds and reduce impacts on residents and services.
• Prioritize streets that can be coordinated with other stake holders, such as utilities or shared jurisdictional roadways.
• Increase use of preventative maintenance strategies to help increase overall PCI and extend useful life of the network.
• Maintain flexibility to shift priorities based on safety, unforeseeable conditions, or opportunities to combine projects or programs.
Agenda Packet Page 176
Subject: Considerations and Options for Pavement Restoration Strategies Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
In addition to the City’s aging infrastructure, many of the local utilities have been actively working on long term plans to extensively repair and replace their systems. As with all areas of road construction, utility coordination is paramount to ensuring the City’s investments are not compromised by non-city projects shortly after improvement have been made. By developing a long term, strategically planned approach to addressing the City’s streets, staff can reduce utility conflicts and deliver better results to the community.
As a result of Council’s direction on this item, staff will return at a later date to seek Council approval on site-specific locations recommended for resurfacing and ancillary improvements, as well as provide information on anticipated timelines for delivery.
Attachment
1) Citywide PCI street list.
Agenda Packet Page 177
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCI ACORCT S010 ACORN CREEK COURT OAK WOOD HILLS CIR CUL‐DE‐SAC 333 26 10731 34 ADOBCT S010 ADOBE CASA COURT SPERRY DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 407 26 10582 38 AHRECT S010 AHRENTZEN COURT ALAVOS COURT CUL‐DE‐SAC 234 26 6084 44 ALBACT S010 ALBA COURT TWIN OAKS AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 824 26 21424 33 ALBUST S010 ALBURY STREET BROOKCREST WAY AMBERWICK WAY 670 26 17420 39 ALLECT S010 ALLENE CREEK COURT ORELLE CREEK COURT CUL‐DE‐SAC 136 26 5446 8 ALLEDT S010 ALLENWOOD COURT DANA BUTTE WAY END (S) 572 26 17662 30ALMAWY S010 ALMA MESA WAY DANA BUTTE WAY DANA BUTTE WAY 1282 26 33332 67 ALMAWY S020 ALMA MESA WAY DANA BUTTE WAY SAN COSME DRIVE 275 26 7150 90 ALMAWY S030 ALMA MESA WAY SAN COSME DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 365 26 9490 90ALMAXY S010 ALMADEN WAY MADISON AVE (W) ALTA VISTA LANE 1060 38 40280 29ALMOAV S010 ALMONDWOOD AVENUE SYLVAN ROAD SYLVAN GLEN WAY 1438 26 37388 62 ALONCT S010 ALONDRA COURT PATTON AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 215 26 9529 27 ALTADR S010 ALTA SUNRISE DRIVE SUNRISE BLVD END 481 42 20202 33ALTALN S010 ALTA VISTA LANE END (W) CELINE DRIVE 1446 42 60732 43 ALYSCT S010 ALYSSA COURT HEATHERINGTON WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 110 50 6266 35 AMBEWY S010 AMBERWICK WAY ALBURY STREET HOSAC WAY 2242 26 58292 31 AMSECT S010 AMSELL COURT MENKE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 542 42 16882 17 AMSTAV S010 AMSTERDAM AVENUE ANTELOPE ROAD VALERIANA AVENUE 585 36 21060 54 AMSTAV S015 AMSTERDAM AVENUE VALERIANA AVENUE END 920 36 33120 21 AMSTAV S020 AMSTERDAM AVENUE GINGERBLOSSOM DRIVE END 815 26 21190 81 ANDRCT S010 ANDRE COURT WACHTEL WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 292 26 9665 32ANNECT S010 ANNE MARIE COURT CHARLAIS WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 429 26 13311 63ANNWCT S010 ANNWOOD COURT BROCKWOOD WAY END (E) 561 26 17472 37 ANSBDR S010 ANSBROUGH DRIVE WINLOCK AVENUE TAREYTON WAY 590 26 15340 25ANSLCT S010 ANSLEY COURT CANDELABRA DRIVE END 348 26 11838 80 ANTERD S010 ANTELOPE ROAD (E) MANGO TREE WAY SAYBROOK DRIVE 913 37 33781 66ANTERD S020 ANTELOPE ROAD (E) SAYBROOK DRIVE POMPEI COURT 932 28 26096 60 ANTERD S030 ANTELOPE ROAD (E) POMPEI COURT TUPELO DRIVE 641 35 22435 56ANTERD S040 ANTELOPE ROAD (E) TUPELO DRIVE GARDEN GATE DRIVE 2736 35 95760 46ANTERD S050 ANTELOPE ROAD (E) GARDEN GATE DRIVE AMSTERDAM AVENUE 1657 31 51367 58ANTERD S060 ANTELOPE ROAD (E) AMSTERDAM AVENUE POPLAR AVENUE 355 31 11005 44 ANTERD S070 ANTELOPE ROAD (E) POPLAR AVENUE LAUPPE LANE 690 44 30360 43 ANTERD S080 ANTELOPE ROAD (E) LAUPPE LANE OAKWOOD LANE 554 29 16066 60 ANTERD S090 ANTELOPE ROAD (E) OAKWOOD LANE AUBURN BLVD 1123 29 32567 72 ANTERD S100 ANTELOPE ROAD (E) AUBURN BLVD MARIPOSA AVENUE 2671 28 74788 58 ANTERD S110 ANTELOPE ROAD (E) MARIPOSA AVENUE SUNRISE BLVD 2809 28 78652 65ANTERD S120 ANTELOPE ROAD (E) SUNRISE BLVD OLD AUBURN ROAD 1403 27 37881 61 ANTWRD S010 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) OLD AUBURN ROAD WONDER STREET 886 29 25694 76 ANTWRD S020 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) WONDER STREET SUNRISE BLVD 573 27 15471 71 ANTWRD S030 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) SUNRISE BLVD WATSON WAY 435 27 11745 66 1 Agenda Packet Page 178 8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIANTWRD S040 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) WATSON WAY MARIPOSA AVENUE 2438 28 68264 67 ANTWRD S050 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) MARIPOSA AVENUE DEANTON COURT 617 27 16659 70 ANTWRD S060 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) DEANTON COURT ORANGE AVENUE 1509 27 40743 60 ANTWRD S070 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) ORANGE AVENUE AUBURN BLVD 472 28 13216 71 ANTWRD S080 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) AUBURN BLVD ROSSWOOD DRIVE 2905 36 104580 55 ANTWRD S090 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) ROSSWOOD DRIVE ROLLINGWOOD DRIVE 933 36 33588 54ANTWRD S100 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) ROLLINGWOOD DRIVE LICHEN DRIVE 2787 36 100332 39 ANTWRD S110 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) LICHEN DRIVE ZENITH DRIVE 553 36 19908 48 ANTWRD S120 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) ZENITH DRIVE SUMMERPLACE DRIVE 602 36 21672 53ANTWRD S130 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) SUMMERPLACE DRIVE SAYBROOK DRIVE 978 27 26406 61ANTWRD S140 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) SAYBROOK DRIVE LONEWOOD WAY 897 37 33189 64 ANTWRD S150 ANTELOPE ROAD (W) LONEWOOD WAY CITY LIMITS (W) 420 37 15540 50 APACWY S010 APACHE WAY NAVION DRIVE SKYLANE DRIVE 1212 26 31512 32APLICT S010 APLITE COURT MICA WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 264 24 9849 59 APPLWY S010 APPLEBY WAY WESTBROOK DRIVE END (W) 253 26 6578 84 APTOCI S010 APTOS CIRCLE RICONADA DRIVE RICONADA DRIVE 951 32 30432 56ARCADR S010 ARCADIA DRIVE GREENBACK LANE SUNRISE BLVD 1830 26 47580 33ARCACT S010 ARCARO COURT LONGDEN CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 202 26 7005 93 ARENCT S010 AREND COURT HOLLAND AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 174 66 11949 14ARGODR S010 ARGO DRIVE OLD AUBURN ROAD ARCARO COURT 1083 26 28158 23ARGODR S020 ARGO DRIVE OLD AUBURN ROAD WEDDELL CT 172 36 6192 51 ASHMST S010 ASHMONT STREET STONEHAND AVENUE BURNTWOOD WAY 775 36 27900 39 ASPGW S010 ASPEN GARDENS WAY STOCK RANCH ROAD ASPEN RANCH COURT 1455 26 37830 82 ASPGCT S010 ASPEN GLEN COURT ASPEN GARDENS WAY WEST END 110 38 4180 81 ASPRCT S010 ASPEN RANCH COURT ASPEN GARDENS WAY EAST END 495 28 13860 78 ASPVCT S010 ASPEN VIEW COURT ASPEN GARDENS WAY EAST END 183 28 5124 84 ASPECT S010 ASPENWOOD COURT WILLOWCREEK WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 232 26 8822 43 ASTECT S010 ASTER COURT FIREWEED CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 510 26 13260 37ATOLCT S010 ATOLL COURT GREENLEAF DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 335 26 12536 76 AUBEBL S010 AUBURN BLVD (E) CITY LIMITS (E) SHADOW LANE 1723 24 41352 57AUBEBL S020 AUBURN BLVD (E) SHADOW LANE DESIMONE LANE 581 24 13944 54AUBEBL S030 AUBURN BLVD (E) DESIMONE LANE GREENBACK LANE 467 24 11208 54 AUBEBL S040 AUBURN BLVD (E) GREENBACK LANE DONEGAL DRIVE 2184 30 65520 50AUBEBL S050 AUBURN BLVD (E) DONEGAL DRIVE VAN MAREN LANE 2166 24 51984 49 AUBEBL S060 AUBURN BLVD (E) VAN MAREN LANE CROSSWOODS PARKWAY 1208 26 31408 53 AUBEBL S070 AUBURN BLVD (E) CROSSWOODS PARKWAY SAN TOMAS DRIVE 1300 26 33800 50 AUBEBL S080 AUBURN BLVD (E) SAN TOMAS DRIVE CHIVALRY ROAD 2338 29 67802 47 AUBEBL S090 AUBURN BLVD (E) CHIVALRY ROAD SYLVAN ROAD 1050 31 32550 59 AUBNBL S010 AUBURN BLVD (N) SYLVAN ROAD MAPLE AVENUE 1400 24 33600 73 AUBNBL S020 AUBURN BLVD (N) MAPLE AVENUE WILLOW WAY 265 24 6360 85AUBNBL S030 AUBURN BLVD (N) WILLOW WAY CARLETON LANE 808 24 19392 85 2 Agenda Packet Page 179 8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIAUBNBL S040 AUBURN BLVD (N) CARLETON LANE COOK AVENUE 342 24 8208 72AUBNBL S050 AUBURN BLVD (N) COOK AVENUE PRATT AVENUE 431 24 10344 76 AUBNBL S060 AUBURN BLVD (N) PRATT AVENUE SYCAMORE DRIVE 560 24 13440 75 AUBNBL S070 AUBURN BLVD (N) SYCAMORE DRIVE ANTELOPE ROAD 585 24 14040 69 AUBNBL S080 AUBURN BLVD (N) ANTELOPE ROAD WATSON WAY 327 24 7848 75 AUBNBL S090 AUBURN BLVD (N) WATSON WAY CEDAR DRIVE 1290 27 34830 77 AUBNBL S100 AUBURN BLVD (N) CEDAR DRIVE BAIRD WAY 827 24 19848 68AUBNBL S110 AUBURN BLVD (N) BAIRD WAY WALNUT DRIVE 483 24 11592 50 AUBNBL S120 AUBURN BLVD (N) WALNUT DRIVE OAK GROVE AVENUE 350 24 8400 61AUBNBL S130 AUBURN BLVD (N) OAK GROVE AVENUE CHERRY GLEN AVENUE 666 24 15984 71 AUBNBL S140 AUBURN BLVD (N) CHERRY GLEN AVENUE TWIN OAKS AVENUE 350 24 8400 59 AUBNBL S150 AUBURN BLVD (N) TWIN OAKS AVENUE LINDEN AVENUE 661 23 15203 65AUBNBL S160 AUBURN BLVD (N) LINDEN AVENUE CITY LIMITS (N) 480 23 11040 79AUBSBL S010 AUBURN BLVD (S) CITY LIMITS (N) AUBURN OAKS COURT 1183 23 27209 60AUBSBL S020 AUBURN BLVD (S) AUBURN OAKS COURT BELLBROOK COURT 332 24 7968 67 AUBSBL S030 AUBURN BLVD (S) BELLBROOK COURT SANDALWOOD DRIVE 553 24 13272 67AUBSBL S040 AUBURN BLVD (S) SANDALWOOD DRIVE ROLLINGWOOD DRIVE 614 24 14736 57AUBSBL S050 AUBURN BLVD (S) ROLLINGWOOD DRIVE GRAND OAKS BLVD 1374 24 32976 61AUBSBL S060 AUBURN BLVD (S) GRAND OAKS BLVD ANTELOPE ROAD 1474 24 35376 65AUBSBL S070 AUBURN BLVD (S) ANTELOPE ROAD PRATT AVENUE 1201 24 28824 74 AUBSBL S080 AUBURN BLVD (S) PRATT AVENUE KANAI AVENUE 652 24 15648 79 AUBSBL S090 AUBURN BLVD (S) KANAI AVENUE OLD AUBURN ROAD 2413 24 57912 77 AUBWBL S010 AUBURN BLVD (W) OLD AUBURN ROAD CARRIAGE DRIVE 1177 30 35310 45 AUBWBL S020 AUBURN BLVD (W) CARRIAGE DRIVE TANDEM COURT 553 30 16590 46 AUBWBL S030 AUBURN BLVD (W) TANDEM COURT RAINTREE DRIVE 311 30 9330 43 AUBWBL S040 AUBURN BLVD (W) RAINTREE DRIVE COACHMAN WAY 583 30 17490 49 AUBWBL S050 AUBURN BLVD (W) COACHMAN WAY SAN TOMAS DRIVE 915 30 27450 46 AUBWBL S060 AUBURN BLVD (W) SAN TOMAS DRIVE COBALT WAY 807 30 24210 41 AUBWBL S070 AUBURN BLVD (W) COBALT WAY JANET DRIVE 501 30 15030 50 AUBWBL S080 AUBURN BLVD (W) JANET DRIVE VAN MAREN LANE 1164 24 27936 50 AUBWBL S090 AUBURN BLVD (W) VAN MAREN LANE CHATHAM WAY 413 46 18998 40 AUBWBL S100 AUBURN BLVD (W) CHATHAM WAY HALIFAX STREET 1120 24 26880 51 AUBWBL S110 AUBURN BLVD (W) HALIFAX STREET GREENBACK LANE 2894 25 72350 50 AUBWBL S120 AUBURN BLVD (W) GREENBACK LANE DEVECCHI AVENUE 2344 25 58600 55 AUBWBL S130 AUBURN BLVD (W) DEVECCHI AVENUE CITY LIMITS (E) 555 25 13875 51AUBU S010 AUBURN FRONTAGE END (E) COBALT WAY 1227 27 33129 92 AUBU S020 AUBURN FRONTAGE SAN TOMAS DRIVE CARRIAGE DRIVE 2282 27 61614 30 AUBUCT S010 AUBURN OAKS COURT AUBURN BLVD RUSCH DRIVE 1149 40 49385 28 AUBUWY S010 AUBURN POINT WAY MCCONNEL DRIVE AUBURN WOODS DIVE 227 26 5902 35 AUBUDT S010 AUBURN WIND COURT MCCONNEL DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 256 26 6656 24 AUBUDR S010 AUBURN WOODS DRIVE END (S) AUBURN BLVD 739 26 19214 13 3 Agenda Packet Page 180 8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIAUTUAV S010 AUTUMN AVENUE OAK FOREST STREET RUSCH DRIVE 1060 26 27560 14 AUTUCT S010 AUTUMN OAK COURT SANDRIDGE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 125 26 3250 30 AVALWY S010 AVALOS WAY PITALO WAY TALBOT WAY 1299 26 33774 48 AWAYWY S010 AWAY WAY MARIPOSA AVENUE MARIPOSA GLEN WAY 1080 26 28080 45 BAIRWY S010 BAIRD WAY AUBURN BLVD CUL‐DE‐SAC 2058 18 40299 68 BANNCT S010 BANNOCK COURT TALBOT WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 161 20 3220 37 BARADR S010 BARANGA DRIVE KAPLAN WAY WINLOCK AVENUE 420 26 10920 90BARADR S020 BARANGA DRIVE WINLOCK AVENUE COBALT WAY 1162 36 41832 89 BARCT S010 BARNWOOD COURT CAMPFIRE WAY EAST END 220 28 6160 32BARTWY S010 BARTIG WAY LINDA SUE MAIDSTONE WAY 965 26 25090 79 BASACT S010 BASALT COURT MICA WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 227 23 8088 68 BASSWY S010 BASSWOOD WAY TREEBINE AVENUE BUTTERNUT DRIVE 993 26 25818 72 BAUGCT S010 BAUGH COURT HOOPES DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 324 26 11214 49 BAYBCT S010 BAYBERRY COURT LARWIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 365 26 9490 49BAYMWY S010 BAYMORE WAY SANDALWOOD COURT END (S) 613 26 18728 90BAYOWY S010 BAYOAK WAY BAYMORE WAY RUSCH DRIVE 868 26 22568 64 BEARDR S010 BEARDED IRIS DRIVE OAK AVENUE FIREWEED CIRCLE 300 36 10800 24 BEAUWY S010 BEAUPRE WAY MUIRWOOD WAY MUIRWOOD WAY 1316 26 34216 43 BECKWY S010 BECKWITH WAY ESCALLONIA DRIVE OLD RANCH ROAD 800 26 20800 41BEGOCT S010 BEGONIA COURT SHADY CREST WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 197 66 14610 3BELLCT S010 BELLBROOK COURT DEVILLE OAKS WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 223 20 6933 32BELLDT S010 BELLFLOWER COURT WOODRUFF WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 156 26 4056 56 BERMWY S010 BERMAN WALK WAY WINTERGREEN DRIVE END (W) 1520 26 39520 36BETACT S010 BETA COURT SUMMERPLACE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 244 26 9134 4 BIERST S010 BIERSTON STREET GLENHURST WAY RUMFORD AVENUE 1325 26 34450 33BIGACT S010 BIG ARROW COURT BLOWING WIND WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 470 26 14463 52 BIGLDR S010 BIGLOW DRIVE BLACKTHORNE WAY SAYBROOK DRIVE 223 46 10258 27BINEDR S010 BINET DRIVE GREENBACK LANE MERCEDES AVENUE 972 43 41796 54BIRCWY S010 BIRCHGLADE WAY DALY AVENUE SAYBROOK DRIVE 1691 37 62567 62 BIRCCI S010 BIRCHWOOD CIRCLE OAK SPRING WAY OAK SPRING WAY 1387 26 36062 37 BIRDST S010 BIRDCAGE STREET UPLANDS GREENBACK LANE 4457 42 187194 79BIRDST S020 BIRDCAGE STREET SUNHILL DRIVE GREENBACK LANE 1056 42 44352 66BITTWY S010 BITTERBUSH WAY CORNERSTONE WAY ZENITH DRIVE 422 26 10972 69 BIXAAV S010 BIX AVENUE HILLTREE AVENUE HILLTREE AVENUE 720 26 18720 90 BIXAAV S020 BIX AVENUE HILLTREE AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 1000 26 37300 24 BLACWY S010 BLACK OAKS WAY OAKBERRY WAY RUSCH DRIVE 1207 26 31382 83BLACCT S010 BLACK WALNUT COURT RED MAPLE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 205 26 5330 25 BLACDR S010 BLACKSTAR DRIVE SUMMER PLACE DRIVE ZENITH DRIVE 567 36 20412 71BLACXY S010 BLACKTHORNE WAY TUPELO DRIVE WOODGLADE AVENUE 2799 26 72774 20BLANCT S010 BLANDFORD COURT KINGSMILL WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 299 26 10564 22 BLAYCT S010 BLAYDEN COURT OLD RANCH ROAD CUL‐DE‐SAC 627 26 19092 13 4 Agenda Packet Page 181 8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIBLAZDR S010 BLAZINGWOOD DRIVE SAYBROOK DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 300 36 10800 23 BLOOWY S010 BLOOM WAY PRIMROSE DRIVE LONGWOOD WAY 717 26 18642 44 BLOSCT S010 BLOSSOM COURT ALMONDWOOD AVENUE END (N) 121 26 3146 61 BLOSDT S010 BLOSSOM HILL COURT TWIN OAKS AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 428 26 13201 36BLOWWY S010 BLOWING WIND WAY FLAMING ARROW DRIVE FLAMING ARROW DRIVE 955 26 24830 93 BLUEWY S010 BLUE JAY WAY GLEN TREE DRIVE WOODCHUCK WAY 989 36 37159 40 BLUEXY S010 BLUE OAK WAY COAST OAK WAY MOSS OAK AV 905 26 23530 23BLUECT S010 BLUE ROSE COURT CUL‐DE‐SAC FIREWEED CIRCLE 180 26 4680 12 BLUEYY S010 BLUE SPRINGS WAY LICHEN DRIVE CITY LIMITS 2283 26 59358 23 BLUEDT S010 BLUEBELL COURT FIREWEED CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 185 26 4810 33 BOGUWY S010 BOGUE WAY ENRIGHT DRIVE CESSNA DRIVE 510 26 13260 16 BONHCI S010 BONHAM CIRCLE SUNHILL DRIVE SUNHILL DRIVE 950 26 24700 27BONIWY S010 BONITA WAY OLD AUBURN RD MARETHA ST 1315 20 26300 95 BONIWY S020 BONITA WAY MARETHA ST LARKSPUR AVENUE 1580 20 31600 58BONNWY S010 BONNIE OAK WAY ORIAL OAK CT CITY LIMITS 1980 26 51480 23 BONWWY S010 BONWIT WAY KAPLAN WAY WINLOCK AVENUE 397 26 10322 79 BRAMWY S010 BRAMBLE TREE WAY CLOVERLEAF WAY WILLOW TREE WAY 629 26 16354 84 BRANWY S010 BRANCHWATER WAY BRIMSTONE DRIVE CRANBERRY COURT 1053 26 27378 38 BRANXY S010 BRANTFORD WAY WESTBROOK DRIVE END (W) 110 34 3740 23BRAYAV S010 BRAYTON AVENUE MARY ANN WAY BROOKCREST WAY 450 26 11700 42BRAYAV S020 BRAYTON AVENUE BROOKCREST WAY END 1946 36 70056 68BREECT S010 BREE ANN COURT CUL‐DE‐SAC FOX HILLS DRIVE 330 26 10653 46 BREMDR S010 BREMAN DRIVE GREENBACK LANE VAN MAREN LANE 2066 36 74376 21 BRIAWY S010 BRIARTREE WAY SUMMERPLACE DRIVE ZENITH DRIVE 1003 26 26078 79 BRIAWY S020 BRIARTREE WAY ZENITH DRIVE ZENITH DRIVE 1880 26 48880 50BRIDWY S010 BRIDGEMONT WAY OAK BEND WAY VAN MAREN LANE 726 26 18876 47 BRILCT S010 BRILL COURT CALVIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 301 26 7826 57 BRIMDR S010 BRIMSTONE DRIVE LICHEN DRIVE ZENITH DRIVE 667 34 22678 75 BRITWY S010 BRITTANY WAY NORTHRIDGE YEOMAN WAY 859 26 22334 23 BROCDR S010 BROCADE DRIVE CALVIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 882 26 25722 69 BROCWY S010 BROCKWOOD WAY STONEHAND AVENUE MESAVIEW DRIVE 2060 26 53560 33BROKCT S010 BROKEN ARROW COURT INDIAN RIVER DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 332 20 9880 21BROKDR S010 BROKEN BOW DRIVE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE PRETTY GIRL COURT 676 26 17576 39 BROKWY S010 BROKENFEATHER WAY BLOWING WIND WAY END 238 20 4760 89 BROOWY S010 BROOKCREST WAY SPICER DRIVE ALBURY STREET 2230 26 57980 58BROODR S010 BROOKDALE DRIVE OAK FOREST STREET RUSCH DRIVE 1135 26 29510 26 BROOXY S010 BROOKHAVEN WAY BROOKTREE DRIVE GREENBACK LANE 1576 26 40976 32BROOCT S010 BROOKNOLL COURT ALBURY STREET CUL‐DE‐SAC 75 26 1950 30 BROODT S010 BROOKOVER COURT BLUE JAY WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 437 26 13435 43BROOET S010 BROOKRIDGE COURT DALMENY WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 685 26 20600 82 BROOER S010 BROOKTREE DRIVE GREENBACK LANE HICKORYWOOD WAY 2508 42 105336 49 5 Agenda Packet Page 182 8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIBROUWY S010 BROUGHAM WAY CIRCLET WAY CANDELABRA DRIVE 640 26 16640 60 BRUSCT S010 BRUSHCREEK COURT MOUNTAINSIDE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 386 26 10036 62BUCKWY S010 BUCKHAVEN WAY WICKHAM DRIVE COTTINGHAM COURT 652 26 16952 73 BUNCCT S010 BUNCHBERRY COURT FIREWEED CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 110 26 2860 48 BURIAV S010 BURICH AVENUE GREENBACK LANE SAN PABLO DRIVE 1130 32 36160 66 BURNDR S010 BURNHAM DRIVE BINET DRIVE END (N) 1617 36 58212 25 BURNCT S010 BURNSIDE COURT ESCALLONIA DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 244 26 9134 15 BURNWY S010 BURNTWOOD WAY BLAZINGWOOD DRIVE ASHMONT STREET 600 26 15600 11BUTTDR S010A BUTTERNUT DRIVE LICHEN DRIVE RADFORD 3528 42 148176 38BUTTDR S010B BUTTERNUT DRIVE RADFORD CITY LIMITS (E) 1440 42 60480 64 BUTTWY S010 BUTTONWOOD WAY TREELARK WAY BASSWOOD WAY 1560 26 40560 46 CALCCT S010 CAL COURT PRIMROSE CUL‐DE‐SAC 313 26 11964 19 CALECT S010 CALESA COURT GRANDBALL WAY END (E) 145 34 6590 75 CALVDR S010 CALVIN DRIVE VAN MAREN LANE CARRIAGE DRIVE 4362 42 183204 51 CAMEWY S010 CAMEL ROCK WAY HOOPES DRIVE SAN COSME DRIVE 1234 26 32084 32 CAMMDR S010 CAMMERAY DRIVE POULSON STREET COPPERWOOD DRIVE 955 26 24830 60CAMOWY S010 CAMOMILE WAY GINGERBLOSSOM DRIVE AMSTERDAM AVENUE 495 26 12870 25CAMWY S010 CAMPFIRE WAY VAN MAREN LANE COWBOY WAY 1689 26 43914 65CAMSCT S010 CAMSTOCK COURT LARWIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 449 26 11674 31 CANALN S010 CANADY LANE OAK AVENUE END (N) 1260 20 25200 12 CANDDR S010 CANDELABRA DRIVE VAN MAREN LANE COBALT WAY 840 26 21840 26 CANDWY S010 CANDLIGHT WAY BROCADE DRIVE MIDNIGHT WAY 2067 26 53742 48CANDCT S010 CANDY CONE COURT CARMELWOOD DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 276 26 10260 76 CANEDR S010 CANELO HILLS DRIVE HOOPES DRIVE SUNGARDEN DRIVE 1846 26 47996 55 CANEDR S020 CANELO HILLS DRIVE SUNGARDEN DRIVE OAK AVE 1686 43 72498 28CANECI S010 CANEVALLEY CIRCLE MOUNTAINSIDE DRIVE MOUNTAINSIDE DRIVE 1483 26 38558 16 CANOCT S010 CANOE BIRCH COURT LARWIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 394 26 13034 57 CANYDR S010 CANYON OAK DRIVE OLD AUBURN ROAD HOLLY OAK STREET 4910 37 181670 30 CAPRDR S010 CAPRICORN DRIVE PLEIDES AVENUE MARIPOSA AVENUE 1624 26 42224 89CARAWY S010 CARANA WAY FRANELA WAY FRANELA WAY 812 26 21112 74CARDCT S010 CARDIGAN COURT WESTBROOK DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 252 26 9438 38 CARLLN S010 CARLETON LANE AUBURN BLVD 263' E OF AUBURN BLVD 263 26 6838 56 CARLLN S020 CARLETON LANE 263' E OF AUBURN BLVD END 364 36 13984 39 CARLDR S010 CARLOW DRIVE BREMEN DRIVE DONEGAL DRIVE 912 36 32832 33 CARMDR S010 CARMELWOOD DRIVE SUMMERPLACE DRIVE LICHEN DRIVE 2457 36 88452 60CAROAV S010 CAROL AVENUE SCRIBNER AVENUE CEDAR AVENUE 475 26 12350 93CARRDR S010 CARRIAGE DRIVE LAUPPE LANE AUBURN BLVD 3650 42 153300 66 CARRCT S010 CARRICK COURT MENKE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 486 26 15426 90 CASAWY S010 CASA BELLA WAY BONITA MEADOWRIVER WAY 1205 26 31330 69 CASSWY S010 CASSINI WAY WESTCHESTER WAY WINLOCK AVENUE 1012 26 26312 45 CASTCT S010 CASTILIAN COURT END SPERRY DRIVE 380 26 9880 32 6 Agenda Packet Page 183 8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCICASTCI S010 CASTLEBERRY CIRCLE VILLAVIEW DRIVE VILLAVIEW DRIVE 1077 26 28002 66 CASUCT S010 CASUARINIA COURT OAKBERRY WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 128 26 3328 30CATADR S010 CATALPA DRIVE DRACENA DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 580 26 15080 65CATAER S010 CATAMARAN DRIVE STANFORD OAK DRIVE TUPELO DRIVE 1450 36 52200 91 CATBCI S010 CATBOAT CIRCLE CATAMARAN DRIVE CATAMARAN DRIVE 881 26 22906 21 CAVADR S010 CAVAN DRIVE BREMAN DRIVE DONEGAL DRIVE 1075 36 38700 28CEDAWY S010 CEDAR CREEK WAY WILLOW CREEK DRIVE END (S) 640 26 16640 35 CEDADR S010 CEDAR DRIVE AUBURN BLVD CAROL AVENUE 1795 16 28720 34CEDGCT S010 CEDAR GARDEN COURT CEDAR RANCH WAY WEST END 123 28 3444 78CEDPCT S010 CEDAR PARK CT RYAN TAYLOR WAY WEST END 85 28 2380 78CEDRDR S010 CEDAR RANCH DRIVE ASPEN GARDENS WAY STOCK RANCH ROAD 1006 26 26156 80 CELEWY S010 CELESTIAL WAY CAPRICORN DRIVE END (N) 910 26 27486 93 CELIDR S010 CELINE DRIVE ALTA VISTA LANE END (N) 1069 42 44898 38 CENTCI S010 CENTURION CIRCLE BIX AVENUE BIX AVENUE 1087 26 28262 78 CESSDR S010 CESSNA DRIVE CALVIN DRIVE VOLTA WAY 575 26 14950 58 CESSDR S020 CESSNA DRIVE VOLTA WAY ENRIGHT DRIVE 457 26 11882 35 CHALCT S010 CHALLIS COURT MARIPOSA GLEN WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 445 26 14456 44CHANCT S010 CHANCERY COURT BIRDCAGE STREET END (W) 205 26 5330 42 CHARWY S010 CHARLENE WAY HANSON AVENUE END 561 26 16263 31CHARAV S010 CHARLOTTE AVENUE GARRYANNA DRIVE END 526 26 13676 43 CHARXY S010 CHAROLAIS WAY WES WAY END (S) 570 26 14820 26 CHATWY S010 CHATHAM WAY MELBOURNE WAY AUBURN BLVD 272 42 11424 58CHECWY S010 CHECKERBLOOM WAY STACEY HILLS DRIVE POPPYFIELD WAY 961 26 24986 75 CHELWY S010 CHELTENHAM WAY WESTBROOK DRIVE TRENTON WAY 1304 26 33904 19 CHERCT S010 CHERRY CREEK COURT CHERRYTREE AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 696 26 18096 33 CHERAV S010 CHERRY GLEN AVENUE AUBURN BLVD HOLLY DRIVE 1290 16 20640 78 CHERDT S010 CHERRY LEAF COURT END CHERRY GLEN AVENUE 366 26 11589 41CHERBV S010 CHERRYTREE AVENUE PEORIA DRIVE BROOKTREE DRIVE 611 26 15886 67 CHESWY S010 CHESHIRE WAY VICEROY WAY NORTHRIDGE 672 26 17472 36CHESDR S010 CHESLINE DRIVE LINDA SUE SAN JUAN AVENUE 2000 42 84000 54 CHEVCT S010 CHEVAL COURT AMSTERDAM AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 147 26 5141 90 CHIPWY S010 CHIPMUNK WAY OLD AUBURN ROAD CUL‐DE‐SAC 1851 26 50199 30CHIPXY S010 CHIPPING WAY SPICER DRIVE CHESLINE DRIVE 1490 26 38740 77 CHIVRD S010 CHIVALRY ROAD AUBURN BLVD END (S) 700 36 25200 52CHULDR S010 CHULA VISTA DRIVE MARIPOSA AVENUE MARIPOSA AVENUE 1320 20 26400 70CIRCWY S010 CIRCLET WAY COBALT WAY WINLOCK AVENUE 2253 27 60831 79 CIRCDR S010 CIRCUIT DRIVE SYLVAN ROAD MARIPOSA AVENUE 2084 26 54184 34 CIROCT S010 CIRO COURT WESTCHESTER WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 173 26 4498 36 CLAYDR S010 CLAY BASKET DRIVE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE SHADOW HAWK DRIVE 648 26 16848 28 CLAYWY S010 CLAYPOOL WAY DAFFODIL WAY VILLA OAK DRIVE 3644 26 94744 51CLEACT S010 CLEAR CREEK COURT LARWIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 264 26 9654 74 7 Agenda Packet Page 184 8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCICLEADR S010 CLEAR VIEW DRIVE WATSON WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 1320 26 34320 54CLOVWY S010 CLOVERLEAF WAY LICHEN DRIVE TREELEAF WAY 1850 26 48100 26CLOVCT S010 CLOVIS COURT SOQUEL CUL‐DE‐SAC 245 26 6370 23 COACWY S010 COACHMAN WAY AUBURN FRONTAGE RAINTREE DRIVE 1003 26 26078 33 COASWY S010 COAST OAK WAY TWIN OAKS AVENUE MOSS OAK AV 1041 26 27066 20 COBAWY S010 COBALT WAY AUBURN BLVD CALVIN DRIVE 3647 42 153174 53 COBBWY S010 COBBLESTONE WAY GARDEN GATE DRIVE HENNING DRIVE 400 26 10400 11 COBRCT S010 COBRA COURT BLACKSTAR DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 268 26 9758 31 COLLWY S010 COLLEGIALITY WAY BERMAN WALK WAY CLAYPOOL WAY 238 26 6188 33 COMMDR S010 COMMUNITY DRIVE SYLVAN ROAD MARIPOSA AVENUE 1936 26 50336 64 CONNCI S010 CONNEMARA CIRCLE DEWEY DRIVE DEWEY DRIVE 1052 26 27352 53 CONODR S010 CONOVER DRIVE OLD AUBURN ROAD NEWBRIDGE WAY 2148 26 55848 14 CONVWY S010 CONVAIR WAY NAVION DRIVE SKYLANE DRIVE 1466 34 49844 26 COOKAV S010 COOK AVENUE AUBURN BLVD MARIPOSA AVENUE 2544 34 86496 83 COPACT S010 COPA COURT SANDRIDGE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 145 26 3770 25 COPPCT S010 COPPER FOX COURT LOCHER WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 183 26 6831 20COPPDT S010 COPPER OAK COURT LOCHER WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 390 26 10140 42 COPPDR S010 COPPERWOOD DRIVE CANELO HILLS DRIVE FAIR OAKS BLVD 2035 26 52910 58 CORAWY S010 CORAL OAK WAY OLD AUBURN ROAD GREENCREEK WAY 1577 26 41002 20 CORACT S010 CORAL REEF COURT GREENLEAF DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 238 26 10014 70 CORDCI S010 CORDELIA CIRCLE SANDALWOOD DRIVE SANDALWOOD DRIVE 969 26 25194 22 CORKWY S010 CORKOAKS WAY OAKBERRY WAY ROSSWOOD DRIVE 545 26 14170 31 CORNWY S010 CORNERSTONE WAY BRIARTREE WAY CARMELWOOD DRIVE 983 26 25558 83 COROCT S010 CORONET COURT MINUET WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 153 26 7694 90 COTIWY S010 COTILLION WAY CANDLIGHT WAY BROCADE DRIVE 903 26 23478 85 COTSWY S010 COTSWALD WAY VICEROY WAY VICEROY WAY 688 26 17888 45 COTTCT S010 COTTINGHAM COURT FESLER COURT CUL‐DE‐SAC 116 26 5089 51 COTTWY S010 COTTINGHAM WAY HEREDIA COURT FESLER COURT 1181 26 30706 75COUNCT S010 COUNTRY COVE COURT ROSA VISTA CUL‐DE‐SAC 265 26 8881 31 COUNWY S010 COUNTRYWOOD WAY GREENLEAF DRIVE HICKORYWOOD WAY 297 26 7722 58COVEDR S010 COVENTRY DRIVE SOMERSWORTH DRIVE FALWORTH STREET 940 26 24440 36 COVECT S010 COVEWOOD COURT BROCKWOOD WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 416 26 12889 93 COWWY S010 COWBOY WAY CAMPFIRE WAY SADDLE HORSE WAY 893 26 23218 73 CRAICT S010 CRAIL COURT SUNGARDEN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 250 26 6500 42 CRANCT S010 CRANBERRY COURT BRANCHWATER WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 332 26 8632 33 CRANWY S010 CRANFORD WAY ESCALLONIA DRIVE END 2515 26 65390 29 CRANDT S010 CRANMORE COURT CAMEL ROCK WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 250 26 6500 30CREEWY S010 CREEK HAVEN WAY OAKCREEK WAY END (W) 106 26 2756 89 CREECI S010 CREEKCREST CIRCLE OAKBROOK DRIVE OAKBROOK DRIVE 1290 26 33540 30 CREEXY S010 CREEKMONT WAY STARFLOWER DRIVE SUNWOOD WAY 1473 26 38298 93 CRESAV S010 CRESTMONT AVENUE TWIN OAKS AVENUE CITY LIMITS 947 36 34092 20 8 Agenda Packet Page 185 8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCICRIPCT S010 CRIPPLE OAK COURT CANYON OAK DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 958 26 27698 24 CROSDR S010 CROSS DRIVE WOODMORE OAKS OAK AVENUE 2665 22 58630 27 CROSCI S010 CROSSWOODS CIRCLE CROSSWOODS PARKWAY CROSSWOODS PARKWAY 7062 42 296604 49CROSPW S010 CROSSWOODS PARKWAY AUBURN BLVD CROOSWOODS CIR 312 48 14976 35 CRUTCT S010 CRUTCHFIELD COURT PITALO WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 238 26 8179 70CRUXDR S010 CRUX DRIVE WOODMORE OAKS SUNGARDEN DRIVE 1300 42 54600 44 CUNAWY S010 CUNANO WAY TUPELO DRIVE LAS LILAS COURT 225 30 6750 61 CURLCT S010 CURLEW COURT BLACK OAKS WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 301 26 11652 79 CUSHCT S010 CUSHMAN COURT VISTARIDGE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 125 26 3250 42CYPRDR S010 CYPRESS POINT DRIVE ALTA VISTA LANE KINGSWOOD DRIVE 954 26 24804 39 DAFFWY S010 DAFFODIL WAY AUBURN BLVD END 1138 26 31579 76 DALMWY S010 DALMENY WAY OLD RANCH ROAD MENKE WAY 729 36 26244 27 DALAV S010 DALY AVENUE TUPELO DRIVE BIRCHGLADE WAY 1118 42 46956 91 DANAWY S010 DANA BUTTE WAY CANELO HILLS DRIVE SINGLE WAY 1770 26 46020 58 DANCCT S010 DANCING CREEK COURT BRIDGEMONT WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 206 26 7429 35 DANNCT S010 DANNON COURT OLD AUBURN ROAD CUL‐DE‐SAC 429 26 13145 71 DAVICT S010 DAVINDA COURT SMOLEY WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 258 26 6708 27 DAWNCT S010 DAWN VIEW COURT TWIN WOOD WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 298 26 7748 28 DEANCT S010 DEANTON COURT ANTELOPE ROAD CUL‐DE‐SAC 226 26 8861 32DEARDR S010 DEARBORN DRIVE MERCEDES AVENUE END (N) 130 36 4680 46 DEBBCT S010 DEBBIE ANN COURT GLEN ALTA WAY END 263 26 8829 22 DEERDR S010 DEERFIELD DRIVE MUIRWOOD WAY HIGHLAND AVENUE 756 32 24192 44 DEMTRCT S010 DEMETER COURT THALIA WAY EAST END 131 28 3668 81 DENIWY S010 DENIO WAY END (W) PATTERSON LANE 857 26 22282 25DENTWY S010 DENTON WAY SUNHILL DRIVE DENTON WAY 1798 32 57536 44 DERBCT S010 DERBY COURT WELLSBORO WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 190 26 8766 18 DESILN S010 DESIMONE LANE AUBURN BLVD GREENBACK LANE 625 55 34375 44DESICT S010 DESIREE COURT PIKES PEAK WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 366 26 11589 46DEVEAV S010 DEVECCHI AVENUE CITY LIMITS AUBURN BLVD 250 24 6000 70 DEVIWY S010 DEVILLE OAKS WAY SANDALWOOD COURT AUBURN BLVD 826 26 21476 33 DEWDWY S010 DEWDROP WAY MISTY CREEK DRIVE WILLOWLEAF DRIVE 227 26 5902 33 DEWNDR S010 DEWEY DRIVE (N) CITY LIMITS (S) CONNEMARA CIRCLE 356 31 11036 36DEWNDR S020 DEWEY DRIVE (N) CONNEMARA CIRCLE CONNEMARA CIRCLE 293 29 8497 45 DEWNDR S030 DEWEY DRIVE (N) CONNEMARA CIRCLE DUNMORE AVENUE 259 29 7511 47 DEWNDR S040 DEWEY DRIVE (N) DUNMORE AVENUE STRATTON AVENUE 476 29 13804 39 DEWNDR S050 DEWEY DRIVE (N) STRATTON AVENUE GREENLEAF DRIVE 493 29 14297 49 DEWNDR S060 DEWEY DRIVE (N) GREENLEAF DRIVE SUMMER RAIN WAY 558 31 17298 43 DEWNDR S070 DEWEY DRIVE (N) SUMMER RAIN WAY GREENBACK LANE 455 35 15925 47DEWSDR S010 DEWEY DRIVE (S) GREENBACK LANE GREENCREEK WAY 853 24 20472 40 DEWSDR S020 DEWEY DRIVE (S) GREENCREEK WAY MEADOWCREEK WAY 210 25 5250 41 DEWSDR S030 DEWEY DRIVE (S) MEADOWCREEK WAY WOODPARK WAY 269 25 6725 37 9 Agenda Packet Page 186 8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIDEWSDR S040 DEWEY DRIVE (S) WOODPARK WAY CITY LIMITS (S) 1115 25 27875 38DICUCT S010 DICUS COURT LICHEN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 358 26 11139 7 DOGWWY S010 DOGWOOD WAY GRAND OAKS BLVD LESSER WAY 678 26 17628 86 DOLAWY S010 DOLAN WAY CALVIN DRIVE CESSNA DRIVE 1506 26 39156 69 DONAWY S010 DONALD WAY TWIN OAKS AVENUE END 500 30 15000 22DONEDR S010 DONEGAL DRIVE AUBURN BLVD VAN MAREN LANE 1424 42 59808 31 DORACT S010 DORAL COURT CYPRESS POINT DRIVE END 470 26 12220 63DOVECT S010 DOVELA COURT GRENOLA WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 123 26 5893 80 DOWAAV S010 DOW AVENUE MARETHA STREET CUL‐DE‐SAC 326 26 8476 95DOWNWY S010 DOWN WAY NORTHEAST CIRCLE EASTGATE AVENUE 238 26 6188 17 DRACDR S010 DRACENA DRIVE SUNRISE BLVD CUL‐DE‐SAC 950 26 24700 47 DUBLWY S010 DUBLIN WY LIMERICK WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 891 26 23166 81 DUDLST S010 DUDLEY STREET PRINCE STREET PRINCE STREET 465 24 11160 65 DUNMAV S010 DUNMORE AVENUE DEWEY DRIVE ALBURY STREET 1450 42 60900 22 DURHST S010 DURHAM STREET WINLOCK AVENUE KITTERY AVENUE 907 26 23582 65EASTAV S010 EASTGATE AVENUE SOUTHGROVE MARIPOSA AVE 959 26 24934 69 EASTAV S020 EASTGATE AVENUE MARIPOSA AVE END (W) 2141 26 55666 28 EASTWY S010 EASTHAVEN WAY GARDEN GATE DRIVE MARINVALE DRIVE 750 26 19500 27 EBONCT S010 EBONYWOOD COURT BROCKWOOD WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 450 26 11700 22 ECTORD S010 ECTON ROAD MARIPOSA AVENUE END (E) 440 26 11440 84EDGECT S010 EDGECLIFF COURT NEWBRIDGE WAY END 489 26 15504 11 EDWACT S010 EDWARDS OAK COURT WATSON WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 586 26 17309 37 ELSOWY S010 EL SOL WAY SPERRY DRIVE LA LUNA COURT 950 26 24700 20 ELGICT S010 ELGIN COURT CLAYPOOL WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 205 26 5330 70 ELLACT S010 ELLA COURT SHAREEN WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 345 26 8970 25 ELLAWY S010 ELLA WAY SOUTH END SHAREEN WY 187 26 4862 44ELZACT S010 ELZA COURT HEATHERINGTON WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 199 26 7165 28 ENGLWY S010 ENGLISH OAK WAY GARRY OAK DRIVE HOLM OAK WAY 790 26 20540 79 ENRIDR S010 ENRIGHT DRIVE CALVIN DRIVE CESSNA DRIVE 2104 26 54704 57ENVOWY S010 ENVOY WAY NORTHRIDGE END (E) 742 26 22082 27 ERICCT S010 ERICWOOD COURT BROCKWOOD WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 650 26 16900 26ESCAWY S010 ESCALANTE WAY CAMEL ROCK WAY COPPERWOOD DRIVE 550 26 14300 43 ESCADR S010 ESCALLONIA DRIVE CITY LIMITS STRENG AVENUE 1482 26 38532 48EVARCT S010 EVA RETTA COURT SUNRISE BLVD END (E) 395 26 15418 55EVENWY S010 EVENING WAY ROLLINGWOOD BLVD END (N) 1718 26 44668 65FAINBL S010 FAIR OAKS BLVD (N) WOODMORE OAKS STACEY HILLS DR 537 20 10740 77 FAINBL S020 FAIR OAKS BLVD (N) STACEY HILLS DRIVE POPPYFIELD WAY 982 24 23568 72 FAINBL S030 FAIR OAKS BLVD (N) POPPYFIELD WAY OAK AVENUE 1489 18 26802 69 FAINBL S040 FAIR OAKS BLVD (N) OAK AVENUE ST. PHILOMENA WAY 1671 18 30078 74FAINBL S050 FAIR OAKS BLVD (N) ST. PHILOMENA WAY VILLA OAK DRIVE 307 26 7982 67 FAINBL S060 FAIR OAKS BLVD (N) VILLA OAK DRIVE OLD AUBURN ROAD 670 20 13400 57 10 Agenda Packet Page 187
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIFAISBL S010 FAIR OAKS BLVD (S) OLD AUBURN ROAD WOODCHUCK WAY 1244 33 41052 74 FAISBL S020 FAIR OAKS BLVD (S) WOODCHUCK WAY OAK AVENUE 1375 18 24750 74 FAISBL S030 FAIR OAKS BLVD (S) OAK AVENUE SAN COSME DRIVE 1159 22 25498 70 FAISBL S040 FAIR OAKS BLVD (S) SAN COSME DRIVE COPPERWOOD DRIVE 535 22 11770 70 FAISBL S050 FAIR OAKS BLVD (S) COPPERWOOD DRIVE WOODMORE OAKS 1280 27 34560 66 FAIRWY S010 FAIR WAY TWIN OAKS AVENUE END (N) 745 20 14900 49 FAIRWY S020 FAIR WAY TWIN OAKS AVENUE END (S) 1268 20 25360 55 FAIRST S010 FAIRYTALE STREET KINGSMEN AVENUE END 650 34 22100 77 FALLWY S010 FALLWOOD WAY TALLOW WOOD WAY RUSCH DRIVE 766 26 19916 85 FALWST S010 FALWORTH STREET SOMERSWORTH DRIVE KITTERY AVENUE 1134 26 29484 37 FARMWY S010 FARMGATE WAY END (N) MARIPOSA AVENUE 2536 34 86224 50 FARMWY S020 FARMGATE WAY MARIPOSA AVENUE BIRDCAGE STREET 2530 34 86020 76 FARMCT S010 FARMHOUSE COURT FARMGATE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 303 26 10035 32FARRCT S010 FARR COURT AWAY WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 200 26 5200 34 FASTCT S010 FAST WATER COURT BROKEN BOW DRIVE END 155 20 3100 30 FELDCT S010 FELDSPAR COURT OLIVINE AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 290 26 7540 71 FELIWY S010 FELICITER WAY MAUANA WAY SAN SIMEON WAY 930 26 24180 77 FELICT S010 FELIPE COURT COBALT WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 130 26 3380 59 FERNCT S010 FERNCREEK COURT MOUNTAINSIDE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 219 26 5694 39 FESLCT S010 FESLER COURT COTTINGHAM COURT CUL‐DE‐SAC 313 26 10211 37 FIRECT S010 FIRE STICK COURT INDIAN RIVER DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 311 20 9460 14 FIREDT S010 FIRE WATER COURT INDIAN RIVER DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 240 20 4800 55 FIRECI S010 FIREWEED CIRCLE ASTER COURT BEARDED IRIS DRIVE 2756 26 71656 46 FLAMDR S010 FLAMING ARROW DR VERNER AVENUE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE 2727 30 81810 93 FLEEDR S010 FLEETWOOD DR MAIDSTONE WAY CHESLINE DRIVE 1350 36 48600 44FLORAV S010 FLORABELLE AVENUE VAN MAREN LANE GARDEN GATE DRIVE 745 26 19370 38 FOOTWY S010 FOOTMAN WAY CARRIAGE DRIVE CANDLIGHT WAY 230 34 7820 36 FORBWY S010 FORBS WAY STACEY HILLS DRIVE POPPYFIELD WAY 968 26 25168 93 FOREWY S010 FOREST GLEN WAY GLEN ALTA WAY GARRY OAK DRIVE 460 26 11960 9 FOREXY S010 FOREST OAK WAY GARRY OAK DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 715 26 18590 27 FORGCT S010 FORGETMENOT CT MANGER WAY END 313 26 8138 39 FOSQDR S010 FOUNTAIN SQUARE DRIVE GREENBACK LANE STOCK RANCH ROAD 2360 40 94400 74 FOXHDR S010 FOX HILLS DR OAK AVENUE SAGINAW WAY 810 26 21060 48 FOXGCT S010 FOXGLOVE COURT FIREWEED CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 175 26 4550 23FOXWCT S010 FOXWOOD COURT GOLDENWOOD CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 431 26 13363 38 FRANWY S010 FRANELA WAY BARANGA DRIVE COBALT WAY 1020 30 30600 74 FRESCT S010 FRESNO COURT KERSTEN STREET CUL‐DE‐SAC 205 26 8120 71 GALEWY S010 GALENA WAY OLIVINE AVENUE END (N) 500 24 12000 57 GALLCI S010 GALLANT CIRCLE CHIVALRY ROAD CHIVALRY ROAD 1705 36 61380 51 GALWCT S010 GALWAY COURT LIMERICK WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 210 34 10545 34 GARDDR S010 GARDEN GATE DRIVE ANTELOPE RD PURSLANE DR 433 60 25980 34 11 Agenda Packet Page 188
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIGARDDR S020 GARDEN GATE DRIVE PURSLANE WAY VAN MAREN LANE 2375 42 99750 33GARDAV S010 GARDENVINE AVENUE END (W) AMSTERDAM AVENUE 530 34 18020 71 GARDAV S020 GARDENVINE AVENUE GARDEN GATE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 710 34 24140 82 GARRDR S010 GARRY OAK DRIVE OLD AUBURN ROAD TWIN OAKS AVENUE 3646 34 123964 40 GARRER S010 GARRYANNA DRIVE END (W) CANYON OAK DRIVE 2184 36 78624 38 GATECT S010 GATESHEAD COURT KINGSMILL WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 281 26 10096 74 GEOFCT S010 GEOFFWOOD COURT STONEHAND AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 252 36 10703 12GEORCT S010 GEORGETTE COURT COBBLESTONE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 100 66 6600 39 GEOWWY S010 GEOWOOD WAY SUNGARDEN DRIVE MEADOWRIVER WAY 1017 26 26442 68 GERAWY S010 GERARD WAY ST. CLAIRE WAY CHIPPING WAY 900 26 23400 76 GIMBWY S010 GIMBEL WAY PIPPIN WAY CASSINI WAY 832 26 21632 70 GINGDR S010 GINGERBLOSSOM DRIVE GARDENVINE AVENUE ZEELAND DRIVE 1925 34 65450 69 GITTCT S010 GITTA RIA COURT TREECREST AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 525 26 13650 24 GLASWY S010 GLASS SLIPPER WAY MIDNIGHT WAY CARRIAGE DRIVE 960 26 24960 93 GLENWY S010 GLEN ALTA WAY GLEN CREEK WAY FOREST GLEN WAY 2235 26 58110 22 GLENXY S010 GLEN ARBOR WAY GLEN TREE DRIVE END 223 36 8028 89 GLENDR S010 GLEN BRIAR DRIVE GLEN TREE DRIVE GLEN ECHO STREET 611 36 21996 24 GLENCT S010 GLEN CANYON COURT CANYON OAK DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 669 26 20184 31 GLENYY S010 GLEN CREEK WAY GLEN TREE DRIVE CANYON OAK DRIVE 1930 36 69480 30 GLENST S010 GLEN ECHO STREET OLD AUBURN ROAD CUL‐DE‐SAC 905 36 32580 28 GLENZY S010 GLEN EVA WAY GLEN TREE DRIVE GLEN ECHO STREET 621 26 16146 67 GLENDT S010 GLEN FIELD COURT GLEN BRIAR DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 407 26 12656 34 GLENET S010 GLEN HOLLOW COURT GOLDENWOOD CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 179 26 6645 35 GLENAV S010 GLEN PARK AVENUE GLEN TREE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 557 26 15544 40GLENBV S010 GLEN STONE AVENUE GLEN TREE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 658 26 19181 35 GLENER S010 GLEN TREE DRIVE CHIPMUNK WAY OLD AUBURN ROAD 642 26 16692 33GLENER S020 GLEN TREE DRIVE GARRYANNA DRIVE OLD AUBURN ROAD 3250 42 136500 25 GLENCI S010 GLEN VALLEY CIRCLE GLEN TREE DRIVE GLEN TREE DRIVE 985 26 25610 66 GLENZZ S010 GLENACRE WAY MARIPOSA AVE END (W) 770 26 20020 75 GLEOWY S010 GLENHURST WAY SAYBROOK DRIVE MILLWOOD DRIVE 1304 36 46944 88 GLENCV S010 GLENN AVENUE PATTON AVENUE MARIPOSA AVENUE 1315 20 26300 54GOBICT S010 GOBI COURT SUMMERPLACE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 240 26 9030 6GOLDCT S010 GOLDEN RAIN COURT LARWIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 194 26 7834 19 GOLDCI S010 GOLDENWOOD CIRCLE VERNER AVENUE VERNER AVENUE 1724 26 44824 25 GOLDWY S010 GOLDWOOD WAY JONQUIL WAY MENKE WAY 595 26 15470 41GRELCT S010 GRACE ELLEN COURT MARIPOSA AVE WEST END 120 25 3000 84GRADDR S010 GRADY DRIVE SHUPE DRIVE PEORIA DRIVE 1010 42 42420 70GRAHCI S010 GRAHAM CIRCLE CIRCUIT DRIVE CIRCUIT DRIVE 1097 26 28522 90GRANBL S010 GRAND OAKS BLVD ROSSWOOD DRIVE AUBURN BLVD 2813 42 118146 21 GRANWY S010 GRANDBALL WAY KINGSMEN AVENUE END (N) 682 26 17732 66GRAYAV S010 GRAYSTONE AVENUE SAYBROOK DRIVE ASHMONT STREET 685 26 17810 13 12 Agenda Packet Page 189
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIGREECT S010 GREEN ASH COURT LARWIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 199 26 7964 35 GREE S010 GREENBACK FRONTAGE PARIS STREET END 917 21 19257 26GREELN S010 GREENBACK LANE (E) CITY LIMITS (W) AUBURN BLVD 1791 38 68058 64 GREELN S020 GREENBACK LANE (E) AUBURN BLVD DESIMONE LANE 319 38 12122 75GREELN S030 GREENBACK LANE (E) DESIMONE LANE PARKOAKS DRIVE 1021 33 33693 72 GREELN S040 GREENBACK LANE (E) PARKOAKS DRIVE OAKSIDE DRIVE 734 24 17616 74GREELN S050 GREENBACK LANE (E) OAKSIDE DRIVE DEWEY DRIVE 934 24 22416 67GREELN S060 GREENBACK LANE (E) DEWEY DRIVE HILLTREE AVENUE 1399 34 47566 38 GREELN S070 GREENBACK LANE (E) HILLTREE AVENUE BROOKHAVEN WAY 547 36 19692 44GREELN S080 GREENBACK LANE (E) BROOKHAVEN WAY BROOKTREE DRIVE 827 24 19848 43 GREELN S090 GREENBACK LANE (E) BROOKTREE DRIVE PEORIA DRIVE 642 24 15408 34GREELN S100 GREENBACK LANE (E) PEORIA DRIVE TERRELL DRIVE 297 33 9801 27 GREELN S110 GREENBACK LANE (E) TERRELL DRIVE SHUPE DRIVE 383 34 13022 14 GREELN S120 GREENBACK LANE (E) SHUPE DRIVE SAN JUAN AVENUE 929 34 31586 25GREELN S130 GREENBACK LANE (E) SAN JUAN AVENUE MARIPOSA AVENUE 2200 36 79200 40GREELN S140 GREENBACK LANE (E) MARIPOSA AVENUE PATTERSON LANE 948 36 34128 39 GREELN S150 GREENBACK LANE (E) PATTERSON LANE MERLINDALE DRIVE 949 36 34164 47 GREELN S160 GREENBACK LANE (E) MERLINDALE DRIVE BIRDCAGE STREET 600 36 21600 57GREELN S170 GREENBACK LANE (E) BIRDCAGE STREET SUNRISE BLVD 1185 33 39105 77 GREELN S180 GREENBACK LANE (E) SUNRISE BLVD SUNRISE VISTA DRIVE 1981 33 65373 94GREELN S190 GREENBACK LANE (E) SUNRISE VISTA DRIVE FAIR OAKS BLVD 586 34 19924 94 GREWLN S010 GREENBACK LANE (W) FAIR OAKS BLVD ARCADIA DRIVE 1398 34 47532 94 GREWLN S020 GREENBACK LANE (W) ARCADIA DRIVE SUNRISE BLVD 1163 34 39542 94 GREWLN S030 GREENBACK LANE (W) SUNRISE BLVD BIRDCAGE STREET 1236 35 43260 65GREWLN S040 GREENBACK LANE (W) BIRDCAGE STREET BURICH AVENUE 1734 36 62424 48 GREWLN S050 GREENBACK LANE (W) BURICH AVENUE MARIPOSA AVENUE 764 36 27504 47 GREWLN S060 GREENBACK LANE (W) MARIPOSA AVENUE SYLVAN ROAD 1584 36 57024 46GREWLN S070 GREENBACK LANE (W) SYLVAN ROAD SAN JUAN AVENUE 600 35 21000 28 GREWLN S080 GREENBACK LANE (W) SAN JUAN AVENUE FOUNTAIN SQUARE DRIVE 1602 35 56070 44GREWLN S090 GREENBACK LANE (W) FOUNTAIN SQUARE DRIVE BINET DRIVE 1455 24 34920 43GREWLN S100 GREENBACK LANE (W) BINET DRIVE PARIS STREET 1264 26 32864 47GREWLN S110 GREENBACK LANE (W) PARIS STREET VAN MAREN LANE 635 26 16510 46 GREWLN S120 GREENBACK LANE (W) VAN MAREN LANE LONGFORD DRIVE 1177 24 28248 66 GREWLN S130 GREENBACK LANE (W) LONGFORD DRIVE BREMAN DRIVE 554 24 13296 73 GREWLN S140 GREENBACK LANE (W) BREMAN DRIVE AUBURN BLVD 1211 38 46018 72 GREWLN S150 GREENBACK LANE (W) AUBURN BLVD MATHENEY WAY 715 36 25740 59GREWLN S160 GREENBACK LANE (W) MATHENEY WAY INDIAN RIVER DRIVE 675 39 26325 50 GREWLN S170 GREENBACK LANE (W) INDIAN RIVER DRIVE CITY LIMITS (E) 495 39 19305 60 GREECI S010 GREENBROOK CIRCLE BROOKTREE DRIVE BROOKTREE DRIVE 1325 26 34450 68GREEWY S010 GREENCREEK WAY OAKCREEK WAY DEWEY DRIVE 779 26 20254 43 GREEAV S010 GREENGLEN AVENUE HIGHVIEW CUL‐DE‐SAC 282 26 7332 30 13 Agenda Packet Page 190
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIGREEDT S010 GREENLAND COURT SUN TERRACE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 489 26 14787 33GREEDR S010 GREENLEAF DRIVE DEWEY DRIVE HICKORYWOOD WAY 1846 26 47996 63 GRENWY S010 GRENOLA WAY BARANGA DRIVE WINLOCK AVENUE 2125 26 55250 73GREYCT S010 GREY OAK COURT CORNERSTONE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 194 26 6954 49 GUENWY S010 GUENIVERE WAY FARMGATE WAY END (W) 1426 26 39866 19GUMWCI S010 GUMWOOD CIRCLE ROLLINGWOOD BLVD ROLLINGWOOD BLVD 1674 24 40176 87HALECT S010 HALESWORTH COURT CRANFORD WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 430 26 13970 10 HALICT S010 HALIBURTON COURT OLD RANCH ROAD CUL‐DE‐SAC 264 26 9654 84HALIST S010 HALIFAX STREET AUBURN BLVD WESTBROOK DRIVE 1337 42 56154 90 HAMMCT S010 HAMMOND COURT LINDA SUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 364 26 9464 77 HANSAV S010 HANSON AVENUE GLEN TREE DRIVE SUNRISE BLVD 1415 22 31130 63 HATFCT S010 HATFIELD COURT BECKWITH WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 464 26 14854 93 HEATCT S010 HEATHERBROOK COURT GLEN CREEK WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 180 26 4680 25 HEATWY S010 HEATHERINGTON WAY MARIPOSA AVENUE SAN STEFANO STREET 750 26 19500 47 HENNDR S010 HENNING DRIVE CALVIN DRIVE ZEELAND DRIVE 1071 34 36414 30 HERAWY S010 HERA WAY THALIA WAY EAST END 315 26 8190 87 HERECT S010 HEREDIA COURT COTTINGHAM COURT CUL‐DE‐SAC 227 26 7975 22 HEREWY S010 HEREDIA WAY MARIPOSA AVENUE COTTINGHAM COURT 311 36 11196 71 HERSCT S010 HERSHBERGER COURT CANELO HILLS DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 150 26 3900 38 HEWY S010 HESPERA WAY THALIA WAY VOLLE WAY 1337 26 34762 82HICKWY S010 HICKORYWOOD WAY DUNMORE AVENUE END (N) 665 26 17290 44 HIGHCT S010 HIGH SUN COURT FLAMING ARROW DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 210 20 4200 44 HIGHAV S010 HIGHLAND AVENUE MARIPOSA AVENUE PACHECO WAY 1414 26 36764 89 HIGHAV S020 HIGHLAND AVENUE PACHECO WAY SUNRISE BLVD 1872 26 48672 64 HIGH S010 HIGHVIEW MADISON AVE (W) KALAMAZOO DRIVE 750 26 19500 59 HILLDR S010 HILL DRIVE END (S) CROSS DRIVE 510 34 17340 4HILLCT S010 HILL SHADE COURT GOLDENWOOD CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 183 26 6831 37 HILLDT S010 HILLSPIRE COURT STARFLOWER DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 116 26 3016 40 HILLAV S010 HILLTREE AVENUE BROOKHAVEN WAY GREENBACK LANE 1008 26 26208 69 HINDWY S010 HINDON WAY CHIPPING WAY CHESLINE DRIVE 691 26 17966 26 HOLLAV S010 HOLLAND AVENUE GINGERBLOSSOM DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 585 26 15210 39HOLLDR S010 HOLLY DRIVE TWIN OAKS AVENUE POPPY WAY 3210 26 83460 53HOLLST S010 HOLLY OAK STREET CORAL OAK WAY CUL‐DE SAC 1687 26 45772 16HOLLCT S010 HOLLYHOCK COURT GARDEN GATE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 372 26 9672 34 HOLMWY S010 HOLM OAK WAY GARRY OAK DRIVE LOBATA STREET 1296 26 33696 90 HOOPDR S010 HOOPES DRIVE CANELO HILLS DRIVE COPPERWOOD DRIVE 1277 26 33202 62 HOWY S010 HORSEMAN WAY VAN MAREN LANE SADDLEHORSE WAY 422 26 10972 67HOSAWY S010 HOSAC WAY AMBERWICK WAY BROOKTREE DRIVE 428 26 11128 19 HYSOCT S010 HYSOPP COURT GINGERBLOSSOM DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 167 26 8281 70 IBEXCT S010 IBEX WOODS COURT PRONGHORN COURT CUL‐DE‐SAC 354 20 9553 12 IMRACI S010 IMRAN WOODS CIRCLE WHYTE AVENUE WHYTE AVENUE 1154 26 30004 32 14 Agenda Packet Page 191
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIINCOCT S010 IN COURT RIDDIO STREET CUL‐DE‐SAC 164 45 8335 30 INDIDR S010 INDIAN RIVER DRIVE GREENBACK LANE FLAMING ARROW DRIVE 3095 38 117610 62 IRONCT S010 IRONBARK COURT SUNMIST WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 127 30 6461 89 JAMEWY S010 JAMESTREE WAY LYNNETREE WAY END 508 26 13208 38 JANACT S010 JANA MARIE COURT LARKSPUR AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 211 26 5486 26 JANEDR S010 JANET DRIVE AUBURN BLVD SOMERSWORTH DRIVE 232 36 8352 26 JENNCT S010 JENNER COURT MANSFIELD DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 640 26 16640 24 JOHACT S010 JOHANNE COURT GINGERBLOSSOM DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 174 26 7314 25JONQWY S010 JONQUIL WAY MENKE WAY END (S) 1515 26 41463 25JORDCT S010 JORDELL COURT OLD RANCH ROAD CUL‐DE‐SAC 847 26 24812 24 JOSHCT S010 JOSHUA COURT FOX HILL DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 506 26 13156 34 JULICT S010 JULI COURT YARROW WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 310 26 8060 44 JULIDT S010 JULIA COURT GRAND OAKS BLVD CUL‐DE‐SAC 384 26 13810 76 JULIET S010 JULIE LYNN COURT IMRAN WOODS CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 195 26 5070 30 KAESCT S010 KAESTNER COURT LICHEN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 282 26 9242 16KANAAV S010 KANAI AVENUE CARRIAGE DRIVE AUBURN BLVD 1290 34 43860 84 KAPLWY S010 KAPLAN WAY PIPPIN WAY CASSINI WAY 825 26 21450 72 KARECT S010 KAREN RAE COURT WES WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 305 24 7320 58 KEESWY S010 KEESWY CHARLOTTE AV W. END 290 26 7540 53
KENSAV S010 KENNETH AVENUE (S) OAK AVENUE QUAILWOOD WAY 948 26 24648 91 KENSAV S020 KENNETH AVENUE (S) QUAILWOOD WAY MENKE WAY 346 33 11418 91KENSAV S030 KENNETH AVENUE (S) MENKE WAY MANSFIELD DRIVE 696 33 22968 91 KENSAV S040 KENNETH AVENUE (S) MANSFIELD DRIVE CITY LIMITS 575 33 18975 91 KENSDR S010 KENSINGTON DRIVE MARIPOSA AVENUE PRIMROSE 1752 26 45552 34 KERMLN S010 KERMIT LANE BRAYTON AVENUE CITY LIMITS 188 35 6580 42 KERSST S010 KERSTEN STREET NOREEN WAY GRENOLA WAY 834 26 21684 15 KETCCT S010 KETCH COURT BIRCHGLADE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 90 26 2340 14KEYEWY S010 KEYESPORT WAY WINTERGREEN DRIVE CLAYPOOL WAY 780 26 20280 38 KEYNST S010 KEYNTEL STREET BROOKCREST WAY BRAYTON AVENUE 749 26 19474 36 KINGAV S010 KINGSMEN AVENUE CARRIAGE DRIVE FAIRYTALE STREET 635 34 21590 77KINGWY S010 KINGSMILL WAY CRANFORD WAY OLD RANCH ROAD 903 26 23478 24KINGWY S020 KINGSMILL WAY OLD RANCH ROAD CUL DE SAC 1184 26 30784 23KINGDR S010 KINGSWOOD DRIVE BIRDCAGE STREET SUNRISE BLVD 476 42 19992 45 KINGDR S020 KINGSWOOD DRIVE SUNRISE BLVD CELINE DRIVE 2220 42 93240 26 KINGDR S030 KINGSWOOD DRIVE END (E) UPLANDS 2345 37 86765 37 KITTAV S010 KITTERY AVENUE VAN MAREN LANE WESTCHESTER WAY 2220 31 68820 54 KLIMCT S010 KLIMECKI COURT BEAUPRE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 155 26 4030 15 KNISCT S010 KNISLEY COURT SADRO STREET END 197 20 6413 89 KNUDWY S010 KNUDSEN WAY DOLAN WAY ENRIGHT DRIVE 400 26 10400 13 KYLECT S010 KYLE COURT FOX HILL DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 350 26 9100 32 LABOCT S010 LA BOUNTY COURT AVALOS WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 270 26 7020 24 15 Agenda Packet Page 192
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCILALUCT S010 LA LUNA COURT SPERRY DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 588 26 15288 29 LAKECT S010 LAKE HURST COURT EASTHAVEN WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 130 26 3380 31 LARKAV S010 LARKSPUR AVENUE HIGHLAND AVENUE END 525 23 12075 66 LARWDR S010 LARWIN DRIVE SUNRISE BLVD WOODMORE OAKS 3315 42 139230 55LASLCT S010 LAS LILAS COURT CUNANO WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 500 26 13000 63 LACT S010 LASSO COURT TRAILRIDE WAY EAST END 188 28 5264 49LAUPLN S010 LAUPPE LANE CARRIAGE DRIVE ANTELOPE ROAD 1915 42 80430 75LAURWY S010 LAURALYN WAY AUBURN WOODS DIVE WOODDALE WAY 570 26 14820 65LEMAAV S010 LE MANS AVENUE PARIS STREET BINET DRIVE 1000 26 26000 33 LEAOCT S010 LEAOAK COURT TREEBINE AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 186 26 4836 42 LEDGWY S010 LEDGEWOOD WAY SAYBROOK DRIVE GRAYSTONE AVENUE 660 26 17160 32 LEEDDR S010 LEE DRIVE TWIN OAKS AVENUE END (S) 1165 20 23300 42 LEEDCT S010 LEEDS COURT MAIDSTONE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 324 26 12250 77 LEHAWY S010 LEHAVRE WAY BINET DRIVE MERCEDES AVENUE 1271 26 33046 28 LEITCT S010 LEITRIM COURT LOUTH WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 228 26 8623 59LENCCT S010 LEN COURT BLACKTHORNE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 230 26 8675 19 LEONDR S010 LEONARD DRIVE OLD AUBURN ROAD END (N) 1825 15 27375 77 LESSWY S010 LESSER WAY GRAND OAKS BLVD RUSCH DRIVE 1430 35 50050 86 LIALWY S010 LIALANA WAY SAYONARA DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 195 42 8190 49 LIALWY S020 LIALANA WAY MUIRWOOD WAY SAYONARA DRIVE 1025 42 43050 45 LICHDR S010 LICHEN DRIVE ANTELOPE ROAD BUTTERNUT DRIVE 2240 42 94080 23LICHDR S020 LICHEN DRIVE BUTTERNUT DRIVE WHYTE AVENUE 4331 42 181902 38 LICHDR S030 LICHEN DRIVE WHYTE AVENUE VERNON OAKS DRIVE 368 26 9568 65 LILLCT S010 LILLIVALE COURT TUPELO DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 134 26 3484 24LIMEWY S010 LIMERICK WAY FARMGATE WAY MARIPOSA AVENUE 1121 26 29146 67 LINOWY S010 LIN OAK WAY MCCONNEL DRIVE WOODDALE WAY 1109 26 28834 58 LINDDR S010 LINDA SUE DRIVE DEWEY DRIVE MAIDSTONE WAY 1180 43 50740 59 LINVDR S010 LINDA VISTA DR OLD AUBURN ROAD END (S) 1040 26 27040 57 LINDAV S010 LINDEN AVENUE AUBURN BLVD END (E) 1900 26 49400 56 LINDCT S010 LINDEN LIME COURT FAIR OAKS BLVD CUL‐DE‐SAC 674 26 20314 69 LITTCT S010 LITTLE ARROW COURT INDIAN RIVER DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 93 20 1860 24LITTWY S010 LITTLE BEAVER WAY FLAMING ARROW DRIVE END 133 20 2660 26LITTXY S010 LITTLE OAKS WAY OAKBERRY WAY ROSSWOOD DRIVE 596 26 15496 38LITTDT S010 LITTLE OL COURT OLD AUBURN ROAD CUL‐DE‐SAC 349 26 11147 48 LITTET S010 LITTLE RIVER COURT INDIAN RIVER DRIVE END 372 20 10680 27 LITTFT S010 LITTLE SQUAW COURT INDIAN RIVER DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 239 20 7253 58LIVOWY S010 LIVE OAK WAY AMSTERDAM AV VALERIANA AV 1779 26 46254 84 LOBAST S010 LOBATA STREET GARRY OAK DRIVE TWIN OAKS AVENUE 1576 26 40976 14 LOCHWY S010 LOCHER WAY HIGHLAND AVENUE COPPER OAK COURT 1098 40 43920 42 LOCHWY S020 LOCHER WAY COPPER OAK COURT SUNRISE BLVD 835 34 28390 28 LOLEAV S010 LOLETA AVENUE PATTON AVENUE MARIPOSA AVENUE 1323 26 34398 46 16 Agenda Packet Page 193
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCILONEWY S010 LONEWOOD WAY ANTELOPE ROAD STONEHAND AVENUE 140 36 5040 29 LONGCI S010 LONGDEN CIRCLE ARGO DRIVE ARGO DRIVE 1094 26 28444 90 LONGDR S010 LONGFORD DRIVE GREENBACK LANE DONEGAL DRIVE 1334 36 48024 21LONGWY S010 LONGWOOD WAY KENSINGTON DRIVE KINGSWOOD DRIVE 1216 26 31616 23LOSSWY S010 LOS SERRANOS WAY JONQUIL WAY GOLDWOOD WAY 557 26 14482 14 LOSTCT S010 LOST CAVERN COURT BLUE SPRINGS WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 276 26 9086 19LOSTDT S010 LOST CREEK COURT CESSNA DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 475 26 14341 27 LOSTET S010 LOST MINE COURT BLUE SPRINGS WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 284 26 9294 52LOUTWY S010 LOUTH WAY BREMEN DRIVE DONEGAL DRIVE 906 26 23556 42 LOVACT S010 LOVATO COURT ENRIGHT DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 156 26 6846 8 LOVECT S010 LOVEWOOD COURT ERICWOOD COURT CUL‐DE‐SAC 205 26 7321 47 LUCKLN S010 LUCKY LANE FARMGATE WAY END (W) 1025 26 26650 30 LYNNWY S010 LYNNETREE WAY CASA BELLA WAY SUNGARDEN DRIVE 1862 26 48412 50 MACYDR S010 MACY PLAZA DRIVE BIRDCAGE STREET SUNRISE BLVD 949 42 39858 21 MADEWY S010 MADELINE WAY RIDDIO STREET OUR WAY 465 26 12090 16 MADWAV S010 MADISON AVE (W) CITY LIMITS (E) ALMADEN 960 34 32640 22 MADWAV S020 MADISON AVE (W) ALMADEN SUNRISE BLVD 1494 34 50796 21 MADWAV S030 MADISON AVE (W) SUNRISE BLVD PRIMROSE 1108 34 37672 33 MADWAV S040 MADISON AVE (W) PRIMROSE UPLANDS 1050 34 35700 63MADWAV S050 MADISON AVE (W) UPLANDS MARIPOSA AVENUE 1300 34 44200 57MADWAV S060 MADISON AVE (W) MARIPOSA AVENUE HIGHVIEW 1203 34 40902 53 MADWAV S070 MADISON AVE (W) HIGHVIEW SAN JUAN AVENUE 886 34 30124 55MADWAV S080 MADISON AVE (W) SAN JUAN AVENUE FLEETWOOD 550 34 18700 91 MADWAV S090 MADISON AVE (W) FLEETWOOD LEEDS 292 34 9928 91 MADWAV S100 MADISON AVE (W) LEEDS LINDA SUE 280 34 9520 91 MADWAV S110 MADISON AVE (W) LINDA SUE BARTIG WY 245 34 8330 91 MADWAV S120 MADISON AVE (W) BARTIG WY CITY LIMITS (W) 270 34 9180 91 MAGICT S010 MAGIC COURT COACHMAN WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 172 26 4472 28 MAIDWY S010 MAIDSTONE WAY BARTIG WAY FLEETWOOD DR 825 26 21450 31 MAIDWY S020 MAIDSTONE WAY FLEETWOOD DR FLEETWOOD DR 1520 26 39520 91 MAJEWY S010 MAJESTIC OAK WAY MESA OAK WAY ALBA COURT 790 27 21330 48 MALICT S010 MALIA COURT PURSLANE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 318 26 11984 73 MANDCI S010 MANDARIN CIRCLE MELVA STREET MELVA STREET 970 26 25220 30 MANGWY S010 MANGER WAY GARRYANNA DRIVE END 581 26 15106 34 MANGXY S010 MANGO TREE WAY ANTELOPE ROAD WOODGATE AVENUE 129 26 3354 25MANNWY S010 MANNERLY WAY TWINING WAY VILLAVIEW DRIVE 1821 26 47346 70MANSDR S010 MANSFIELD DRIVE KENNETH AVENUE OLD RANCH ROAD 1659 26 45924 20 MAPLAV S010 MAPLE AVENUE AUBURN BLVD SYLVAN GROVE WAY 1026 18 18468 56 MARVWY S010 MAR VISTA WAY TUPELO DRIVE GLENHURST WAY 1626 26 42276 3 MARACT S010 MARANTA COURT SUNMIST WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 195 30 8501 62 MAREST S010 MARETHA STREET BONITA WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 626 25 15650 95 17 Agenda Packet Page 194
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIMARIDR S010 MARINVALE DRIVE VAN MAREN LANE GARDEN GATE DRIVE 810 27 21870 26 MARNAV S010 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) OLD AUBURN ROAD ECTON ROAD 756 17 12852 59 MARNAV S020 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) ECTON ROAD HEREDIA COURT 540 18 9720 42 MARNAV S030 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) HEREDIA COURT SYCAMORE DRIVE 645 18 11610 69MARNAV S040 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) SYCAMORE DRIVE ANTELOPE ROAD 340 18 6120 78 MARNAV S050 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) ANTELOPE ROAD RENO LANE 136 13 1768 78 MARNAV S060 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) RENO LANE WATSON WAY 469 15 7035 26MARNAV S070 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) WATSON WAY LOLETA AVENUE 1611 18 28998 47 MARNAV S080 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) LOLETA AVENUE GLENN AVENUE 629 16 10064 42 MARNAV S090 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) GLENN AVENUE TWIN OAKS AVENUE 1652 16 26432 48 MARNAV S095 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) TWIN OAKS AVENUE CITY LIMIT (N) 883 16 14128 50 MARNAV S100 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) GREENBACK LANE SAN SIMEON WAY 1567 20 31340 60 MARNAV S110 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) SAN SIMEON WAY HEATHERINGTON WAY 320 20 6400 36 MARNAV S120 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) HEATHERINGTON WAY AWAY WAY 258 20 5160 37 MARNAV S130 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) AWAY WAY MARIPOSA GLEN WAY 795 20 15900 22 MARNAV S140 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) MARIPOSA GLEN WAY HIGHLAND AVENUE 1248 17 21216 49MARNAV S150 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) HIGHLAND AVENUE MITCHELL COURT 1520 17 25840 35 MARNAV S160 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) MITCHELL COURT ROSA VISTA 330 17 5610 28 MARNAV S170 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) ROSA VISTA OLD AUBURN ROAD 2221 17 37757 41 MARNAV S180 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) MADISON AVE (W) CAPRICORN DRIVE 194 19 3686 75 MARNAV S190 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) CAPRICORN DRIVE PLEIDES AVENUE 532 19 10108 76 MARNAV S200 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) PLEIDES AVENUE NORTHEAST CIRCLE 765 17 13005 62 MARNAV S210 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) NORTHEAST CIRCLE NORTHEAST CIRCLE 217 19 4123 52 MARNAV S220 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) NORTHEAST CIRCLE EASTGATE AVENUE 280 20 5600 40 MARNAV S230 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) EASTGATE AVENUE KENSINGTON DRIVE 359 19 6821 78 MARNAV S240 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) KENSINGTON DRIVE FARMGATE WAY 327 19 6213 88MARNAV S250 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) FARMGATE WAY NORTHRIDGE 1178 15 17670 88 MARNAV S260 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) NORTHRIDGE RITA LOU WAY 728 15 10920 73MARNAV S270 MARIPOSA AVENUE (N) RITA LOU WAY GREENBACK LANE 305 17 5185 70 MARSAV S005 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) CITY LIMIT (N) TWIN OAKS AVENUE 883 20 17660 52 MARSAV S010 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) TWIN OAKS AVENUE ROBERTS DRIVE 479 20 9580 63 MARSAV S020 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) ROBERTS DRIVE OAK GROVE AVENUE 300 20 6000 50 MARSAV S030 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) OAK GROVE AVENUE WALNUT DRIVE 468 20 9360 26 MARSAV S040 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) WALNUT DRIVE POPPY WAY 1783 18 32094 46MARSAV S050 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) POPPY WAY WATSON WAY 769 16 12304 34 MARSAV S060 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) WATSON WAY RENO LANE 463 16 7408 34MARSAV S070 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) RENO LANE ANTELOPE ROAD 132 16 2112 71 MARSAV S080 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) ANTELOPE ROAD SYCAMORE DRIVE 232 16 3712 59MARSAV S090 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) SYCAMORE DRIVE PRATT AVENUE 469 16 7504 48 MARSAV S100 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) PRATT AVENUE COOK AVENUE 470 16 7520 41 MARSAV S110 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) COOK AVENUE OLD AUBURN ROAD 1017 16 16272 41 18 Agenda Packet Page 195
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIMARSAV S120 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) OLD AUBURN ROAD GLENACRE WAY 1523 16 24368 45MARSAV S130 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) GLENACRE WAY PRINCE STREET 1239 16 19824 50 MARSAV S140 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) PRINCE STREET COMMUNITY DRIVE 639 16 10224 27 MARSAV S150 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) COMMUNITY DRIVE TRILBY COURT 2318 16 37088 35 MARSAV S160 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) TRILBY COURT CIRCUIT DRIVE 219 20 4380 39 MARSAV S170 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) CIRCUIT DRIVE CHULA VISTA DRIVE 578 20 11560 38 MARSAV S180 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) CHULA VISTA DRIVE CHULA VISTA DRIVE 287 20 5740 31 MARSAV S190 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) CHULA VISTA DRIVE GREENBACK LANE 1917 20 38340 54 MARSAV S200 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) GREENBACK LANE LIMERICK WAY 1400 19 26600 73 MARSAV S210 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) LIMERICK WAY FARMGATE WAY 827 19 15713 56MARSAV S220 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) FARMGATE WAY EASTGATE AVENUE 727 19 13813 43 MARSAV S230 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) EASTGATE AVE NORTHEAST CIR 546 20 10920 54MARSAV S240 MARIPOSA AVENUE (S) NORTHEAST CIR MADISON AVE (W) 1562 20 31240 66 MARICT S010 MARIPOSA COVE COURT ROSA VISTA CUL‐DE‐SAC 325 26 10523 21 MARIWY S010 MARIPOSA GLEN WAY MARIPOSA AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 966 26 27189 46MARSCT S010 MARSALA COURT ALTA VISTA LANE CUL‐DE‐SAC 576 26 17577 42MARYWY S010 MARY ANN WAY BROOKCREST WAY SPERRY DRIVE 876 26 22776 30 MATHWY S010 MATHENEY WAY GREENBACK LANE 293' N OF GREENBACK LANE 293 42 12306 51MATHWY S020 MATHENEY WAY 293' E OF GREENBACK LANE END 1200 22 26400 53MATHXY S010 MATHIS WAY MCLIN WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 222 26 7682 43 MAUAWY S010 MAUANA WAY SAYONARA DRIVE END 1613 26 41938 66MAUAWY S020 MAUANA WAY MARIPOSA GLEN WAY SAYONARA DRIVE 1110 26 28860 76MCCLDR S010 MCCLUNG DRIVE COPPERWOOD DRIVE COPPERWOOD DRIVE 880 26 22880 51 MCCODR S010 MCCONNEL DRIVE AUBURN POINT WAY END (S) 1448 26 37648 42 MCCRCT S010 MCCRONE COURT AVALOS WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 285 26 7410 33 MCLIWY S010 MCLIN WAY GEOWOOD WAY SUNRISE BLVD 527 26 13702 36 MEADWY S010 MEADOWCREEK WAY DEWEY DRIVE PARKOAKS DRIVE 1818 26 47268 61MEADXY S010 MEADOWRIVER WAY END (W) END (E) 443 26 11518 57MELCCT S010 MEL COURT RICONADA DRIVE END 441 26 11466 93 MELBWY S010 MELBOURNE WAY HALIFAX STREET WESTBROOK DRIVE 1287 26 33462 31 MELVST S010 MELVA STREET OAK AVENUE PRIME WAY 1636 26 42536 25 MENKWY S010 MENKE WAY KENNETH AVENUE OAK AVENUE 2123 26 57988 29 MERCAV S010 MERCEDES AVENUE VAN MAREN LANE BURNHAM DRIVE 3015 36 108540 40 MERLDR S010 MERLINDALE DRIVE GREENBACK LANE GUENIVERE WAY 2614 26 70754 35 MERRCT S010 MERRYMUM COURT FIREWEED CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 110 31 3410 18MESAWY S010 MESA OAK WAY HOLLY OAK STREET ALBA COURT 2128 27 57456 24MESADR S010 MESAVIEW DRIVE SUMMERPLACE DRIVE BROCKWOOD WAY 600 26 15600 46 MICOCT S010 MI COURT MATHENEY WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 198 26 5148 21 MICAWY S010 MICA WAY END (E) OLIVINE AVENUE 744 26 21417 82MIDNWY S010 MIDNIGHT WAY CARRIAGE DRIVE RAINTREE DRIVE 900 26 23400 58 MIKECT S010 MIKE ARTHUR COURT ALTA VISTA LANE CUL‐DE‐SAC 500 26 13000 27 19 Agenda Packet Page 196
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIMILLDR S010 MILLWOOD DRIVE TUPELO DRIVE BIERSTON STREET 900 36 32400 30MIMOCT S010 MIMOSA COURT BUTTONWOOD WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 200 26 5200 41 MINGWY S010 MING WAY SAYONARA DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 136 36 4896 39 MINUWY S010 MINUET WAY RAINTREE DRIVE CALVIN DRIVE 945 26 24570 76 MIRACT S010 MIRAVALE COURT BLACKTHORNE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 469 26 14889 23 MISTWY S010 MISTLETOE WAY BUTTERNUT DRIVE MANNERLY WAY 611 26 15886 24 MISTDR S010 MISTY CREEK DRIVE VAN MAREN LANE NAVION DRIVE 2087 42 87654 82 MISTXY S010 MISTY WOOD WAY SUNMIST WAY SUNBURST WAY 1002 26 26052 68 MITCCT S010 MITCHELL COURT MARIPOSA AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 418 26 10868 58 MONTCI S010 MONTE CORITA CIRCLE SPERRY DRIVE SPERRY DRIVE 980 26 25480 74 MOONWY S010 MOON ROCK WAY INDIAN RIVER DRIVE END 242 26 6292 23 MORNWY S010 MORNINGSIDE WAY OAK FOREST STREET RUSCH DRIVE 1050 26 27300 84 MOSSAV S010 MOSS OAK AV CANYON OAK DRIVE CRESTMONT AVENUE 1725 36 62100 21MOSSXY S010 MOSSVIEW WAY MISTY CREEK DRIVE SUNWOOD WAY 848 26 22048 66MOUNDR S010 MOUNTAINSIDE DRIVE LICHEN DRIVE WHYTE AVENUE 2001 37 74037 73 MUGHCT S010 MUGHO COURT NAVION DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 120 34 6495 46MUIRWY S010 MUIRWOOD WAY BEADRE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 1002 26 26052 71 MUSCCT S010 MUSCHETTO COURT AMSTERDAM AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 297 26 9795 25 MYRTCT S010 MYRTLEWOOD COURT BROCKWOOD WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 150 26 3900 16NAVIDR S010 NAVION DRIVE VAN MAREN LANE SUNBURST WAY 4111 42 172662 74NETTCT S010 NETTLE COURT YARROW WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 340 26 11630 57 NEWBWY S010 NEWBRIDGE WAY CONOVER DRIVE CONOVER DRIVE 1555 31 48205 16 NIGHCT S010 NIGHTINGALE COURT SUNHILL DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 200 26 5200 57NORDCT S010 NORDIC COURT AWAY WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 203 26 7351 34 NOREWY S010 NOREEN WAY BARANGA DRIVE GRENOLA WAY 593 26 15418 4 NORTWY S010 NORTH COLONY WAY HOLLY DRIVE WALNUT DRIVE 752 26 19552 6 NORTDR S010 NORTH RIDGE DRIVE MARIPOSA AVENUE END (E) 2092 26 54392 32NORTCI S010 NORTHEAST CIRCLE MARIPOSA AVENUE MARIPOSA AVENUE 1592 26 41392 26 NORTXY S010 NORTHGROVE WAY WESTGATE DRIVE NORTHLEA WAY 1019 26 26494 71NORTYY S010 NORTHLEA WAY SAN JUAN AVENUE WESTGATE DRIVE 1246 26 32396 16 NORTZY S010 NORTHVALE WAY NEWBRIDGE WAY CONOVER DRIVE 888 26 23088 30 OAKACT S010 OAK ACORN COURT OAKBROOK DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 131 26 3406 19 OAKEAV S010 OAK AVENUE (E) SUNRISE BLVD CANELO HILLS DRIVE 675 30 20250 53 OAKEAV S020 OAK AVENUE (E) CANELO HILLS DRIVE SINGLE WAY 1684 29 48836 55 OAKEAV S030 OAK AVENUE (E) SINGLE WAY FAIR OAKS BLVD 240 32 7680 46 OAKEAV S040 OAK AVENUE (E) FAIR OAKS BLVD CROSS DRIVE 1252 15 18780 55 OAKEAV S050 OAK AVENUE (E) CROSS DRIVE MELVA STREET 1072 15 16080 52 OAKEAV S060 OAK AVENUE (E) MELVA STREET OLD RANCH ROAD 785 25 19625 47 OAKEAV S070 OAK AVENUE (E) OLD RANCH ROAD MENKE WAY 859 25 21475 53 OAKEAV S080 OAK AVENUE (E) MENKE WAY KENNETH AVENUE 1121 28 31388 40 OAKWAV S010 OAK AVENUE (W) WACHTEL WAY BEARDED IRIS DRIVE 1183 28 33124 46 20 Agenda Packet Page 197
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIOAKWAV S020 OAK AVENUE (W) BEARDED IRIS DRIVE OLIVINE AVENUE 1019 28 28532 40 OAKWAV S030 OAK AVENUE (W) OLIVINE AVENUE ST. PHILOMENA WAY 2725 22 59950 42 OAKWAV S040 OAK AVENUE (W) ST. PHILOMENA WAY FAIR OAKS BLVD 200 24 4800 40 OAKWAV S050 OAK AVENUE (W) FAIR OAKS BLVD FOX HILLS DRIVE 1674 18 30132 56OAKWAV S060 OAK AVENUE (W) FOX HILLS DRIVE SUNRISE BLVD 895 22 19690 55 OAKBWY S010 OAK BEND WAY BRIDGEMONT WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 419 26 12967 45 OAKBCT S010 OAK BRANCH COURT WONNER WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 550 26 16457 51 OAKFST S010 OAK FOREST STREET EVENING WAY END (S) 1449 26 37674 30 OAKGAV S010 OAK GROVE AVENUE HOLLY DRIVE MARIPOSA AVENUE 1393 26 36218 46 OAKGAV S020 OAK GROVE AVENUE AUBURN BLVD END 870 15 13050 86 OAKLLN S010 OAK LAKES LANE VAN MAREN LANE HIDDEN BROOK LANE 2028 26 52728 37OAKMCT S010 OAK MEADOW COURT LARWIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 375 26 9750 42 OAKSWY S010 OAK SPRING WAY BIRCHWOOD CIRCLE ROLLINGWOOD BLVD 795 26 20670 46 OAKBXY S010 OAKBERRY WAY ROLLINGWOOD BLVD ROLLINGWOOD BLVD 2125 26 55250 48 OAKBDT S010 OAKBRIDGE COURT MEADOWCREEK WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 201 26 5226 93 OAKBDR S010 OAKBROOK DRIVE CL @ CREEKCREST CIR MEADOWCREEK WAY 1215 38 46170 27 OAKCWY S010 OAKCREEK WAY WOODCREEK DRIVE END (N) 3466 26 90116 33OAKMWY S010 OAKMYRTLE WAY BUTTONWOOD WAY BUTTERNUT DRIVE 225 34 7650 63OAKSDR S010 OAKSIDE DRIVE OAKCREEK WAY GREENBACK LANE 552 36 19872 50 OAKWCI S010 OAKWOOD HILLS CIRCLE OLD AUBURN ROAD OLD AUBURN ROAD 1401 26 36426 49 OAKWLN S010 OAKWOOD LANE ANTELOPE ROAD CUL‐DE‐SAC 524 32 16768 49 OCONCT S010 OCONEE COURT SAN COSME DRIVE END (S) 338 26 8788 25 OLDERD S010 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) SYLVAN ROAD LITTLE OL COURT 862 26 22412 48 OLDERD S020 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) LITTLE OL COURT WES WAY 246 26 6396 24 OLDERD S030 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) WES WAY LINDA VISTA DRIVE 1009 26 26234 36OLDERD S040 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) LINDA VISTA MARIPOSA AVENUE 963 24 23112 38OLDERD S050 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) MARIPOSA AVENUE BONITA WAY 786 22 17292 17OLDERD S060 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) BONITA WAY TIARA WAY 1735 22 38170 64 OLDERD S070 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) TIARA WAY SUNRISE BLVD 530 25 13250 68 OLDERD S080 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) SUNRISE BLVD SOQUEL WAY 627 30 18810 58 OLDERD S090 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) SOQUEL WAY SOQUEL WAY 448 20 8960 26 OLDERD S100 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) SOQUEL WAY GLEN TREE WAY 707 27 19089 43 OLDERD S110 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) GLEN TREE WAY CHIPMUNK WAY 450 27 12150 18 OLDERD S120 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) CHIPMUNK WAY FAIR OAKS BLVD 605 27 16335 40 OLDERD S130 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) FAIR OAKS BLVD AUBURN WOODS DRIVE 952 18 17136 58 OLDERD S140 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) AUBURN WOODS DRIVE WOODDALE WAY 658 13 8554 56 OLDERD S150 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) WOODDALE WAY DAFFODIL WAY 335 13 4355 47 OLDERD S160 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) DAFFODIL WAY WINTERGREEN DRIVE 1073 17 18241 67 OLDERD S170 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) WINTERGREEN DRIVE ARGO DRIVE 2232 30 66960 58OLDERD S180 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) ARGO DRIVE WACHTEL WAY 935 23 21505 56OLDERD S190 OLD AUBURN ROAD (E) WACHTEL WAY CITY LIMITS (E) 840 27 22680 57 21 Agenda Packet Page 198
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIOLDWRD S010 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) CITY LIMITS (E) WACHTEL WAY 282 30 8460 73OLDWRD S020 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) WACHTEL WAY OAKWOOD HILLS CIRCLE 178 18 3204 47 OLDWRD S030 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) OAKWOOD HILLS CIRCLE ARGO DRIVE 765 32 24480 59 OLDWRD S040 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) ARGO DRIVE CONOVER DRIVE 357 34 12138 61 OLDWRD S050 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) CONOVER DRIVE ROBERT CREEK COURT 245 38 9310 53 OLDWRD S060 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) ROBERT CREEK COURT ORELLE CREEK COURT 607 18 10926 58 OLDWRD S070 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) ORELLE CREEK COURT CANYON OAK DRIVE 408 17 6936 58 OLDWRD S080 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) CANYON OAK DRIVE TWIN OAKS AVENUE 810 18 14580 52 OLDWRD S090 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) TWIN OAKS AVENUE CORAL OAK WAY 1417 17 24089 50 OLDWRD S100 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) CORAL OAK WAY GARRY OAK DRIVE 1027 16 16432 57 OLDWRD S110 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) GARRY OAK DRIVE GLEN ECHO STREET 757 26 19682 53 OLDWRD S120 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) GLEN ECHO STREET DANNON COURT 439 25 10975 41 OLDWRD S130 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) DANNON COURT GLEN TREE DRIVE 283 25 7075 33 OLDWRD S140 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) GLEN TREE DRIVE ANTELOPE ROAD 390 25 9750 28 OLDWRD S150 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) ANTELOPE ROAD SUNRISE BLVD 1361 27 36747 35 OLDWRD S160 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) SUNRISE BLVD WICKHAM DRIVE 1752 22 38544 51 OLDWRD S170 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) WICKHAM DRIVE MARIPOSA AVENUE 1378 22 30316 51 OLDWRD S180 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) MARIPOSA AVENUE LEONARD DRIVE 1381 26 35906 43 OLDWRD S190 OLD AUBURN ROAD (W) LEONARD DRIVE AUBURN BLVD 1621 27 43767 50OLDOCT S010 OLD OAK COURT LARWIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 445 26 11570 21 OLDRRD S010 OLD RANCH ROAD OAK AVENUE CITY LIMITS 2950 36 106200 24 OLIVWY S010 OLIVE TREE WAY LARWIN DRIVE RED MAPLE WAY 1333 26 34658 68 OLIVAV S010 OLIVINE AVENUE OAK AVENUE WACHTEL WAY 3850 42 161700 65 OPHECT S010 OPHELIA COURT WOODDALE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 266 26 6916 20 ORANDR S010 ORANGE DRIVE ANTELOPE ROAD END (E) 927 26 24102 39 ORELCT S010 ORELLE CREEK COURT OLD AUBURN ROAD CUL‐DE‐SAC (N) 625 26 18324 19 ORIACT S010 ORIAL OAK COURT BONNIE OAK WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 287 26 7462 26 OURWWY S010 OUR WAY RIDDIO STREET END (W) 1054 26 27404 26 OURWWY S020 OUR WAY FARMGATE WAY MADELINE WAY 384 26 9984 27 OUTLDR S010 OUTLOOK DRIVE LICHEN DRIVE TANOAK WAY 331 36 11916 64 OUTLDR S020 OUTLOOK DRIVE TANOAK WAY ZENITH DRIVE 621 36 22356 70 OUTLDR S030 OUTLOOK DRIVE ZENITH DRIVE WOODYARD WAY 881 36 31716 72 OUTLDR S040 OUTLOOK DRIVE WOODYARD WAY VILLAVIEW DRIVE 256 36 9216 63 OUTLDR S050 OUTLOOK DRIVE VILLAVIEW DRIVE CITY LIMITS 186 36 6696 36 PACHWY S010 PACHECO WAY HIGHLAND AVENUE END 2000 32 64000 83PACOCT S010 PACO COURT SUMMERPLACE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 310 26 8060 28 PAPOCT S010 PAPOOSE COURT INDIAN RIVER DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 158 20 3160 40 PARDCT S010 PARDAL COURT PATTON AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 215 26 9529 27 PARIST S010 PARIS STREET MERCEDES AVENUE FRONTAGE ROAD 731 36 26316 32 PARIWY S010 PARISH WAY ROSSWOOD DRIVE TABARE COURT 1041 26 27066 88 PARIWY S020 PARISH WAY TABARE COURT ROLLINGWOOD BLVD 175 26 4550 89 22 Agenda Packet Page 199
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIPARKDR S010 PARK DRIVE SYLVAN ROAD END (E) 1431 20 28620 78 PARKCI S010 PARKCREEK CIRCLE PARKOAKS DRIVE PARKOAKS DRIVE 1140 26 29640 23PARKWY S010 PARKCREST WAY PARKOAKS DRIVE OAKSIDE DRIVE 711 26 18486 58PARKER S010 PARKOAKS DRIVE CITY LIMIT (S) GREENBACK LANE 2090 42 87780 31PARKXY S010 PARKVALE WAY CATAMARAN DRIVE TUPELO DRIVE 2854 26 74204 46PARKYY S010 PARKVIEW WAY PARKOAKS DRIVE OAKCREEK WAY 852 26 22152 30 PARMCT S010 PARMIS COURT POPPY WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 365 26 11481 38 PATTLN S010 PATTERSON LANE GREENBACK LANE END (S) 623 26 16198 28 PATTAV S010 PATTON AVENUE WATSON WAY TWIN OAKS AVENUE 3946 26 102596 55PEACAV S010 PEACHTREE AVENUE PEORIA DRIVE BROOKTREE DRIVE 602 26 15652 64 PEBBDR S010 PEBBLE BEACH DRIVE SUNRISE BLVD KINGSWOOD DRIVE 1254 42 52668 39 PEBBWY S010 PEBBLEBROOK WAY SUNMIST WAY TWIN WOOD WAY 986 26 25636 69PEMBWY S010 PEMBROKE WAY FALWORTH STREET COVENTRY DRIVE 605 26 15730 41 PENNWY S010 PENNINGTON WAY VISTARIDGE DRIVE END 283 26 7358 48 PEONCT S010 PEONY COURT GRENOLA WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 90 26 2340 93 PEORDR S010 PEORIA DRIVE GRADY DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 500 36 18000 56PEORDR S020 PEORIA DRIVE GRADY DRIVE GREENBACK LANE 1000 40 40000 59PEPPCT S010 PEPPERCRESS COURT GARDENVINE AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 187 26 6936 77PEPPDT S010 PEPPERMINT COURT LARWIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 354 26 11994 77PEPPWY S010 PEPPERTREE WAY CARMELWOOD DRIVE RAMBLEWOOD WAY 1091 26 28366 39 PERDCT S010 PERDEZ COURT PATTON AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 214 26 9390 31PEREWY S010 PEREGRINE WAY GARRYANNA DRIVE CHARLOTTE AVENUE 654 26 17004 36 PETRCT S010 PETER RAY CT MARIPOSA AVENUE WEST END 295 28 8260 75 PHOECT S010 PHOEBE COURT PHOEBE WAY EHD 183 26 4747 79
PHOEWY S010 PHOEBE WAY TALBOT WAY END (N) 1556 26 40456 53 PICNCT S010 PICNIC COURT GUMWOOD CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 393 26 14271 93 PIKEWY S010 PIKES PEAK WAY STANFORD AVENUE CATAMARAN DRIVE 1181 26 30706 33 PILKCT S010 PILKERTON COURT GEOWOOD WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 176 26 6649 51 PIMIDR S010 PIMIENTA DRIVE SADRO STREET CARRIAGE DRIVE 620 26 16120 39 PINEWY S010 PINECREEK WAY SAYBROOK DRIVE SAYBROOK DRIVE 1418 26 36868 26 PIPECT S010 PIPER COURT CONVAIR WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 348 26 11121 28 PIPPWY S010 PIPPIN WAY WINLOCK AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 1554 34 54985 65PITAWY S010 PITALO WAY WACHTEL WAY AVALOS WAY 714 26 18564 71 PLEIAV S010 PLEIDES AVENUE MARIPOSA AVENUE KINGSWOOD DRIVE 1324 26 34424 29 PLUMCT S010 PLUM TREE COURT LARWIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 215 26 5590 28POLLWY S010 POLLEN WAY ALMONDWOOD AVENUE END (S) 721 26 18746 24POMEWY S010 POMEROY WAY LANGSPUR AVENUE JAMESTREE WAY 588 26 15288 36 POMPCT S010 POMPEI COURT ANTELOPE ROAD CUL‐DE‐SAC 574 26 17714 30 PONTWY S010 PONTICELLI WAY TALBOT WAY WACHTEL WAY 420 26 10920 44 POPLAV S010 POPLAR AVENUE ANTELOPE ROAD END 1270 24 30480 25 POPPWY S010 POPPY WAY MARIPOSA AVENUE HOLLY DRIVE 1246 26 32396 44 23 Agenda Packet Page 200
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIPOPPXY S010 POPPYFIELD WAY CHECKERBLOSSOM YARROW WAY 612 26 15912 63 POPPXY S020 POPPYFIELD WAY FAIR OAKS BLVD CHECKERBLOOM WAY 110 26 2860 71 POSCT S010 POSEIDON CT SOL WAY EAST END 91 28 2548 81
POSTWY S010 POSTEN WAY ZENITH DRIVE BRANCHWATER WAY 686 26 17836 30POULST S010 POULSON STREET HOOPES DRIVE CAMMERAY DRIVE 1970 26 51220 46 PRATAV S010 PRATT AVENUE AUBURN BLVD MARIPOSA AVENUE 2570 25 64250 49 PRATAV S020 PRATT AVENUE CARRIAGE DRIVE AUBURN BLVD 1265 40 50600 50 PRETCT S010 PRETTY BUSH COURT INDIAN RIVER DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 205 20 4100 93 PRETDT S010 PRETTY GIRL COURT BROKEN BOW DRIVE END 205 20 4100 51 PRIMWY S010 PRIME WAY CROSS DRIVE MELVA STREET 1043 26 27118 24PRIMDR S010 PRIMROSE DRIVE FARMGATE WAY MADISON AVE (W) 3400 37 125800 29PRINST S010 PRINCE STREET MARIPOSA AVENUE DUDLEY STREET 1818 24 43632 69 PRINCT S010 PRINCESS COURT CALVIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 128 26 3328 25 PRONCT S010 PRONGHORN COURT WHYTE AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 492 26 14865 17PURSDR S010 PURSLANE DR VAN MAREN LN GARDEN GATE DRIVE 758 62 46996 26 PURSDR S020 PURSLANE DR FLORABELLE AVENUE PURSLANE WAY 385 26 10010 23 QUAIWY S010 QUAILWOOD WAY KENNETH AVENUE LOS SERRANOS WAY 796 26 20696 25 QUINCI S010 QUINCEWOOD CIRCLE RUMFORD AVENUE RUMFORD AVENUE 860 26 22360 36 RADFST S010 RADFORD STREET BUTTERNUT DRIVE MANNERLY WAY 640 26 16640 70 RAINDR S010 RAINTREE DRIVE AUBURN FRONTAGE CALVIN DRIVE 1913 42 80346 39RAMBWY S010 RAMBLEWOOD WAY SUMMERPLACE DRIVE CARMELWOOD DRIVE 1386 26 36036 15 RANCAV S010 RANCH AVENUE END (N) END (S) 627 24 15048 13 RHWY S010 RANCH HAND WAY RANCH HOUSE WAY CAMPFIRE WAY 544 26 14144 46RAHWY S010 RANCH HOUSE WAY TRAILRIDE WAY CAMPFIRE WAY 1095 26 28470 59 RATTWY S010 RATTON WAY BRIARTREE WAY BRIARTREE WAY 652 26 16952 82 RAVEWY S010 RAVENCREST WAY BRIARTREE WAY SUMMERPLACE DRIVE 969 26 25194 26 RAYWCT S010 RAYWOOD COURT WOODSIDE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 261 26 8859 21 REDMWY S010 RED MAPLE WAY LARWIN DRIVE WOODMORE OAKS 1116 26 29016 63REDOCT S010 RED OAKS COURT ROLLINGWOOD BLVD CUL‐DE‐SAC 233 26 6058 28 REDPCT S010 RED PINE COURT LARWIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 274 26 9914 75 REDSCT S010 REDSKIN COURT FLAMING ARROW DRIVE END (W) 131 20 2620 23 REGACT S010 REGAN COURT BARANGA DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 205 26 5330 39 REGLCT S010 REGLI WOODS COURT WHYTE AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 266 20 7704 7 REINCT S010 REINA COURT SUMMERPLACE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 214 26 5564 38 RENACT S010 RENAISSANCE COURT LINDA VISTA DRIVE END (W) 180 26 4680 28 RENFCT S010 RENFREW COURT WICKHAM DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 341 26 10939 48 RENOLN S010 RENO LANE END (W) END (E) 1677 30 52176 23
RICODR S010 RICONADA DRIVE HIGHLAND AVENUE END (S) 1490 34 50660 31 RIDDST S010 RIDDIO STREET FARMGATE WAY OUR WAY 847 26 22022 23 RIDGCT S010 RIDGEVIEW COURT PARKVIEW WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 198 26 5148 7RIGGCT S010 RIGGING COURT BIRCHGLADE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 90 44 3960 20 24 Agenda Packet Page 201
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIRIPPCT S010 RIPPLEWOOD COURT PRATT AVENUE END 330 26 8580 34RITAWY S010 RITA LOU WAY MARIPOSA AVENUE DENIO WAY 637 26 16562 26ROBECT S010 ROBERT CREEK COURT OLD AUBURN ROAD CUL‐DE‐SAC 308 26 9839 9 ROBEDR S010 ROBERTS DRIVE MARIPOSA AVENUE END (W) 811 26 21086 53ROIEWY S010 ROBIE WAY TWIN OAKS AVENUE CITY LIMITS 710 20 14200 45ROBMCT S010 ROBMAR COURT COOK AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 268 26 8959 16ROBUWY S010 ROBUR WAY CANYON OAK DRIVE MESA OAK WAY 229 26 5954 26 ROLLCT S010 ROLLINGSIDE COURT TWIN PARK DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 145 26 5843 61 ROLLBL S010 ROLLINGWOOD BLVD ANTELOPE ROAD AUBURN BLVD 5554 42 233268 33 ROSAAV S010 ROSA VISTA AVENUE MARIPOSA AVENUE END 1329 26 34554 45RORD S010 ROSEVILLE RD BUTTERNUT DRIVE CITY LIMITS 2165 29 62785 39 ROSSDR S010 ROSSWOOD DRIVE OAKBERRY WAY ANTELOPE ROAD 2437 36 87732 36 ROWAWY S010 ROWAN WAY SHUPE DRIVE GRADY DRIVE 814 26 21164 34 RUMFAV S010 RUMFORD AVENUE SAYBROOK DRIVE BIERSTON STREET 650 26 16900 32 RUNNCT S010 RUNNING WATER COURT INDIAN RIVER DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 216 20 7560 53 RUNYCT S010 RUNYON COURT SMOLEY WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 153 26 3978 20 RUSCDR S010 RUSCH DRIVE WOODRUFF WAY RUSCH PARK ENT 3115 36 112140 30RYANWY S010 RYAN TAYLOR WY CEDAR RANCH ASPEN GARDENS 627 26 16302 76 SADHWY S010 SADDLE HORSE WAY COWBOY WAY CAMPFIRE WAY 934 26 24284 73 SADRST S010 SADRO STREET PRATT AVENUE KANAI AVENUE 631 34 21454 21SAFFWY S010 SAFFRON WAY FLEETWOOD SPERRY DRIVE 957 26 24882 77SAGECT S010 SAGE OAK COURT MOSSVIEW WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 105 26 2730 33 SAGEWY S010 SAGEMENT WAY VISTARIDGE DRIVE END 292 26 7592 56 SAGIWY S010 SAGINAW WAY SOQUEL FOX HILL DRIVE 1105 26 28730 56 SAGIXY S010 SAGITARIUS WAY EASTGATE AVENUE END (S) 846 26 21996 50 SAMPCT S010 SAMPOLO COURT JAMESTREE WAY END (E) 365 26 9490 52 SANBWY S010 SAN BENITO WAY SANTA CATARINA WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 453 26 11778 78 SANCDR S010 SAN COSME DRIVE CANELO HILLS DRIVE FAIR OAKS BLVD 1900 26 49400 71SANNAV S010 SAN JUAN AVENUE (N) MADISON AVE (W) WILLOW CREEK DRIVE 1422 28 39816 47 SANNAV S020 SAN JUAN AVENUE (N) WILLOW CREEK DRIVE RANCH AVENUE 896 28 25088 68 SANNAV S030 SAN JUAN AVENUE (N) RANCH AVENUE WESTGATE DRIVE 612 28 17136 44 SANNAV S040 SAN JUAN AVENUE (N) WESTGATE DRIVE NORTHLEA WAY 777 28 21756 53 SANNAV S050 SAN JUAN AVENUE (N) NORTHLEA WAY GREENBACK LANE 1543 24 37032 48 SANNAV S060 SAN JUAN AVENUE (N) GREENBACK LANE SYLVAN ROAD 972 23 22356 46 SANSAV S010 SAN JUAN AVENUE (S) SYLVAN ROAD GREENBACK LANE 1017 22 22374 44 SANSAV S020 SAN JUAN AVENUE (S) GREENBACK LANE SPERRY DRIVE 1135 24 27240 46SANSAV S030 SAN JUAN AVENUE (S) SPERRY DRIVE SPICER DRIVE 1931 24 46344 47 SANSAV S040 SAN JUAN AVENUE (S) SPICER DRIVE CHESLINE DRIVE 805 24 19320 43SANSAV S050 SAN JUAN AVENUE (S) CHESLINE DRIVE MADISON AVE (W) 1352 24 32448 42 SANPDR S010 SAN PABLO DRIVE SAN SIMEON WAY BURICH AVENUE 600 36 21600 51 SANSWY S010 SAN SIMEON WAY MARIPOSA AVENUE SAYONARA DRIVE 1717 42 72114 65 25 Agenda Packet Page 202
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCISANSST S010 SAN STEFANO STREET SAN SIMEON WAY HEATHERINGTON WAY 1050 26 27300 61 SANTDR S010 SAN TOMAS DRIVE CROSSWOODS CIR AUBURN BLVD 970 42 40740 40SANTDR S020 SAN TOMAS DRIVE AUBURN BLVD WESTCHESTER WAY 310 42 13020 43 SANDDR S010 SANDALWOOD DRIVE RUSCH DRIVE AUBURN BLVD 1817 42 76314 87 SANDCT S010 SANDPIPER COURT SUNHILL DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 145 26 3770 42 SANDWY S010 SANDRIDGE WAY MESAVIEW DRIVE SUMMERPLACE DRIVE 900 26 23400 26 SANDDT S010 SANDWOOD COURT BROCKWOOD WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 350 26 9100 28 SANTWY S010 SANTA CATARINA WAY END (S) SAN STEFANO STREET 938 26 24388 81SARAWY S010 SARA LYNN WAY PRATT AVENUE END 527 26 13702 41 SASSCT S010 SASSY COURT PIKES PEAK WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 270 26 9093 41SAWGCI S010 SAWGRASS CIRCLE KINGSWOOD DRIVE KINGSWOOD DRIVE 1194 26 31044 21 SAYBDR S010 SAYBROOK DRIVE TUPELO DRIVE ANTELOPE ROAD 2830 42 118860 10 SAYBDR S020 SAYBROOK DRIVE ANTELOPE ROAD BROCKWOOD WAY 1055 42 44310 85SAYODR S010 SAYONARA DRIVE SUNRISE BLVD CUL‐DE‐SAC 2765 39 107835 60 SCARCI S010 SCARLET OAK CIRCLE TWIN OAKS AVENUE TWIN OAKS AVENUE 1260 26 32760 40SCHOWY S010 SCHOONER WAY CATAMARAN DRIVE PARKVALE WAY 548 26 14248 84SCRIAV S010 SCRIBNER AVENUE HOLLY DRIVE END (E) 767 26 19942 93SEASCT S010 SEA SHELL COURT GREENLEAF DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 285 26 7410 83 SERRCT S010 SERRANO COURT BLACKSTAR DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 300 26 10590 25 SHADDR S010 SHADOW HAWK DRIVE FLAMING ARROW DRIVE END 1821 26 47346 56SHADLN S010 SHADOW LANE AUBURN BLVD END (E) 1185 36 42660 73 SHADER S010 SHADOW OAK DRIVE DUNMORE AVENUE GREENLEAF DRIVE 636 26 16536 25 SHADWY S010 SHADOWBROOK WAY NORTHBROOK END 630 26 16380 0 SHADXY S010 SHADY CREST WAY SANDALWOOD COURT END (N) 320 26 8320 25 SHADCT S010 SHADY GROVE COURT LARWIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 249 26 9264 71 SHADYY S010 SHADY SPRINGS WAY SUNMIST WAY SUNBURST WAY 996 26 25896 9 SHALWY S010 SHALIMAR WAY PARIS STREET LE MANS AVENUE 930 26 24180 34 SHARWY S010 SHAREEN WAY PATTON AVENUE ELLA COURT 300 26 7800 59 SHASCT S010 SHASTA DAISY COURT FIREWEED CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 150 26 3900 13 SHAWCT S010 SHAWNDA COURT PARKVALE WAY END (E) 368 26 11641 42 SHEWY S010 SHERLOCK WAY WATSON WAY NORTH END 285 26 7410 85SHOEWY S010 SHOEMAKER WAY CONOVER DRIVE ARGO DRIVE 381 26 9906 37 SHUPDR S010 SHUPE DRIVE SPERRY DRIVE GREENBACK LANE 1330 43 57190 41 SIERWY S010 SIERRAVALE WAY PARKVALE WAY TUPELO DRIVE 888 26 23088 84 SILKCT S010 SILK OAK COURT NAVION DRIVE END 195 44 10406 20 SILKWY S010 SILK WOOD WAY SHADY SPRINGS WAY SUNBURST WAY 907 26 23582 79 SILVCT S010 SILVER ROCK COURT TALBOT WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 300 21 6300 27 SILWY S010 SILVERSADDLE WAY OAK LAKES LANE COWBOY WAY 472 26 12272 73 SINGWY S010 SINGLE WAY SAN COSME DRIVE OAK AVENUE 1220 26 31720 76SKYVCT S010 SKY VISTA COURT MAR VISTA WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 320 26 11206 12 SKYCCT S010 SKYCREST COURT NORTHLEA WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 232 26 9971 17 26 Agenda Packet Page 203
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCISKYLDR S010 SKYLANE DRIVE VAN MAREN LANE NAVION DRIVE 1752 42 73584 72 SKYLCT S010 SKYLARK COURT NORTHGROVE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 339 26 12867 31 SKYLDT S010 SKYLINE COURT WESTGATE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 374 26 9724 35 SLOOCT S010 SLOOP COURT BIRCHGLADE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 90 26 2340 1SMALCT S010 SMALL HILL COURT INDIAN RIVER DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 465 20 12747 84 SMOKCT S010 SMOKE TREE COURT LARWIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 224 26 8614 76 SMOLWY S010 SMOLEY WAY VILLA OAK DRIVE END (N) 1264 26 32864 47 SOFTCT S010 SOFTWOOD COURT BROCKWOOD WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 385 26 12001 21SOLWY S010 SOL WAY STOCK RANCH ROAD THALIA WAY 620 26 16120 87 SOMEDR S010 SOMERSWORTH DRIVE COBALT WAY VAN MAREN LANE 1332 34 45288 72SOQUWY S010 SOQUEL WAY OLD AUBURN ROAD OLD AUBURN ROAD 1074 26 27924 79 SORRCT S010 SORRELL COURT ZENITH DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 318 26 11058 80 SOUTDR S010 SOUTHGROVE DRIVE FARMGATE WAY WELLS AVENUE 1440 34 48960 57 SOUTCT S010 SOUTHVIEW COURT EASTGATE AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 600 26 15600 58 SOVECT S010 SOVERIGN COURT FAIRYTALE STREET CUL‐DE‐SAC 175 26 4550 47 SPERDR S010 SPERRY DRIVE LINDA SUE WAY CHESLINE DRIVE 735 42 30870 19 SPERDR S020 SPERRY DRIVE CHESLINE DRIVE SAN JUAN AVENUE 3637 42 152754 48SPICDR S010 SPICER DRIVE KERMIT LANE SAN JUAN AVENUE 2170 43 93310 77 SPRICT S010 SPRIG OAKS COURT LESSER WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 170 26 4420 10 SPRIAV S010 SPRING VALLEY AVENUE RICONADA DRIVE END (E) 1858 32 59456 67SPRIDT S010 SPRINGLEAF CT SUNBURST WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 193 26 5018 37SPRIWY S010 SPRINGVALE WAY BLACKTHORNE WAY PARKVALE WAY 684 26 17784 31 ST.ACT S010 ST. ALBANS COURT BLUE SPRINGS WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 113 58 8536 16 ST.CWY S010 ST. CLAIRE WAY SPERRY DRIVE CHESLINE DRIVE 1088 26 28288 70 ST.JWY S010 ST. JEANNE WAY ST. PHILOMENA WAY END 133 26 3458 51 ST.PCT S010 ST. PATRICK COURT GARDEN GATE DRIVE END 458 26 14698 48 ST.PWY S010 ST. PHILOMENA WAY OAK AVENUE FAIR OAKS BLVD 1784 26 46384 65 STACDR S010 STACEY HILLS DRIVE FAIR OAKS BLVD CROSS DRIVE 1382 26 35932 26STANAV S010 STANFORD AVENUE SUNRISE BLVD WONDER STREET 631 21 13251 19 STARDR S010 STARFLOWER DRIVE MISTY CREEK DRIVE CREEKMONT WAY 1025 26 26650 68STARCT S010 STARLING COURT ZENITH DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 184 26 4784 26 STARDT S010 STARWOOD COURT BROCKWOOD WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 175 26 4550 24STEAWY S010 STEARMAN WAY NAVION DRIVE SKYLANE DRIVE 920 26 23920 48 STEFCT S010 STEFFANO COURT LOUTH WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 294 26 10434 30STEMCT S010 STEM COURT ALMONDWOOD AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 121 26 3146 45 STINWY S010 STINSON WAY SKYLANE DRIVE WILLOWLEAF DRIVE 287 26 7462 30 STOCRD S010 STOCK RANCH ROAD SYLVAN ROAD END 3002 36 108072 66 STONCI S010 STONE CANYON CIRCLE WOODMORE OAKS WOODMORE OAKS 1480 26 38480 77 STONCT S010 STONECROP COURT LICHEN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 278 26 7228 42STONAV S010 STONEHAND AVENUE SUMMERPLACE DRIVE SAYBROOK DRIVE 969 36 34884 65 STONAV S020 STONEHAND AVENUE SAYBROOK DRIVE GEOFFWOOD COURT 900 36 32400 20 27 Agenda Packet Page 204
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCISTONWY S010 STONERIDGE WAY TUPELO DRIVE GLENHURST WAY 881 26 22906 25STRAAV S010 STRATTON AVENUE TROVILLION STREET DEWEY DRIVE 707 26 18382 26 STREAV S010 STRENG AVENUE OLD RANCH ROAD MELVA STREET 1186 26 30836 30 STREAV S020 STRENG AVENUE MELVA STREET 8207 STRENG AVE 1945 26 50570 56 STREAV S030 STRENG AVENUE 8207 STRENG AVE OAK AVENUE 865 26 22490 87SUDDCT S010 SUDDEN WIND COURT BROKEN BOW DRIVE END 160 20 3200 84 SUGAWY S010 SUGAR MAPLE WAY LARWIN DRIVE LARWIN DRIVE 1834 26 50474 59SUMMAV S010 SUMMER AVENUE OAK FOREST STREET RUSCH DRIVE 1061 42 44562 66 SUMMWY S010 SUMMER RAIN WAY CENTURION CIRCLE DEWEY DRIVE 496 26 12896 52 SUMMDR S010 SUMMERPLACE DRIVE ANTELOPE ROAD ZENITH DRIVE 4560 36 164160 41 SUNHDR S010 SUN HILL DRIVE SUNRISE BLVD END (W) 1660 36 59760 51 SUNTWY S010 SUN TERRACE WAY VILLA OAK DRIVE CLAYPOOL WAY 1378 26 35828 32 SUNBWY S010 SUNBURST WAY NAVION DRIVE MISTY WOOD WAY 2133 26 55458 79SUNGDR S010 SUNGARDEN DRIVE SUNRISE BLVD CANELO HILLS DRIVE 660 42 27720 27 SUNGDR S020 SUNGARDEN DRIVE BONITA SUNRISE BLVD 1311 36 47196 59SUNLCT S010 SUNLAND CT SUN TERRACE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 482 26 14605 40SUNMWY S010 SUNMIST WAY SUNBURST WAY MISTY WOOD WAY 1487 26 38662 65SUNNBL S010 SUNRISE BLVD (N) MADISON AVE (W) ALTA SUNRISE DRIVE 1037 40 41480 53SUNNBL S020 SUNRISE BLVD (N) ALTA SUNRISE DRIVE PEBBLE BEACH DRIVE 476 34 16184 57SUNNBL S030 SUNRISE BLVD (N) PEBBLE BEACH DRIVE KINGSWOOD DRIVE 571 34 19414 54SUNNBL S040 SUNRISE BLVD (N) KINGSWOOD DRIVE GREENBACK LANE 3110 34 105740 46SUNNBL S050 SUNRISE BLVD (N) GREENBACK LANE ARCADIA DRIVE 1038 35 36330 56 SUNNBL S060 SUNRISE BLVD (N) ARCADIA DRIVE LARWIN DRIVE 1934 35 67690 58 SUNNBL S070 SUNRISE BLVD (N) LARWIN DRIVE WOODMORE OAKS 2004 36 72144 38 SUNNBL S080 SUNRISE BLVD (N) WOODMORE OAKS SUNGARDEN DRIVE 1184 35 41440 40 SUNNBL S090 SUNRISE BLVD (N) SUNGARDEN DRIVE OAK AVENUE 1820 35 63700 58 SUNNBL S100 SUNRISE BLVD (N) OAK AVENUE OLD AUBURN ROAD 1294 35 45290 70SUNNBL S110 SUNRISE BLVD (N) OLD AUBURN ROAD ANTELOPE ROAD 1358 35 47530 69SUNNBL S120 SUNRISE BLVD (N) ANTELOPE ROAD HANSON AVENUE 762 35 26670 82 SUNNBL S130 SUNRISE BLVD (N) HANSON AVENUE STANFORD AVENUE 1298 35 45430 82 SUNNBL S140 SUNRISE BLVD (N) STANFORD AVENUE TWIN OAKS AVENUE 1910 35 66850 85 SUNNBL S150 SUNRISE BLVD (N) TWIN OAKS AVENUE CITY LIMITS (N) 530 35 18550 86 SUNSBL S010 SUNRISE BLVD (S) CITY LIMITS (N) TWIN OAKS AVENUE 603 26 15678 85 SUNSBL S020 SUNRISE BLVD (S) TWIN OAKS AVENUE EVA RETTA COURT 1093 36 39348 86 SUNSBL S030 SUNRISE BLVD (S) EVA RETTA COURT DRACENA DRIVE 455 27 12285 84 SUNSBL S040 SUNRISE BLVD (S) DRACENA DRIVE ANTELOPE ROAD 2463 34 83742 84SUNSBL S050 SUNRISE BLVD (S) ANTELOPE ROAD OLD AUBURN ROAD 1433 39 55887 70SUNSBL S060 SUNRISE BLVD (S) OLD AUBURN ROAD VISTARIDGE DRIVE 1428 34 48552 78SUNSBL S070 SUNRISE BLVD (S) VISTARIDGE DRIVE MCLIN WAY 1085 34 36890 50SUNSBL S080 SUNRISE BLVD (S) MCLIN WAY SUNGARDEN DRIVE 491 34 16694 84 SUNSBL S090 SUNRISE BLVD (S) SUNGARDEN DRIVE LOCHER WAY 1210 34 41140 58 28 Agenda Packet Page 205
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCISUNSBL S100 SUNRISE BLVD (S) LOCHER WAY HIGHLAND AVENUE 978 34 33252 38SUNSBL S110 SUNRISE BLVD (S) HIGHLAND AVENUE SAYONARA DRIVE 1484 34 50456 56 SUNSBL S120 SUNRISE BLVD (S) SAYONARA DRIVE SUN HILL DRIVE 1467 34 49878 72SUNSBL S130 SUNRISE BLVD (S) SUN HILL DRIVE GREENBACK LANE 977 40 39080 57 SUNSBL S140 SUNRISE BLVD (S) GREENBACK LANE MACY PLAZA DRIVE 2424 40 96960 46SUNSBL S150 SUNRISE BLVD (S) MACY PLAZA DRIVE KINGSWOOD DRIVE 752 34 25568 54 SUNSBL S160 SUNRISE BLVD (S) KINGSWOOD DRIVE UPLANDS WAY 1041 34 35394 65 SUNSBL S170 SUNRISE BLVD (S) UPLANDS WAY MADISON AVE (W) 966 34 32844 43 SUNRCT S010 SUNRISE CREEK COURT BIRDCAGE STREET END (W) 195 26 5070 38 SUNRDR S010 SUNRISE EAST DRIVE FAIR OAKS BLVD SUNRISE VISTA DRIVE 1130 40 45200 26 SUNRER S010 SUNRISE VISTA DRIVE SUNRISE EAST DRIVE GREENBACK LANE 2243 43 96449 31SUNWWY S010 SUNWOOD WAY STARFLOWER DRIVE MISTY CREEK DRIVE 1107 26 28782 90 SUTRCT S010 SUTRO COURT GALLANT CIRCLE END (N) 191 26 4966 22 SWEECT S010 SWEET GUM COURT SWEET GUM COURT CUL‐DE‐SAC 374 26 12514 74 SWEEDT S010 SWEETWOOD COURT ROLLINGWOOD BLVD CUL‐DE‐SAC 222 26 5772 86 SYCADR S010 SYCAMORE DRIVE END (W) END (E) 543 26 14118 36 SYCADR S020 SYCAMORE DRIVE AUBURN BLVD MARIPOSA AVENUE 2570 20 51400 74 SYCADR S030 SYCAMORE DRIVE MARIPOSA AVENUE END (E) 1504 20 30080 28 SYLVCT S010 SYLVAN CREEK COURT SYLVAN ROAD END (E) 1101 26 30869 41 SYLVWY S010 SYLVAN GLEN WAY COMMUNITY DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 590 26 15340 76 SYLVXY S010 SYLVAN GROVE WAY OLD AUBURN ROAD END (N) 1126 22 24772 89 SYLMCT S010 SYLVAN MEADOW COURT SYLVAN VALLEY WY NORTH END 188 28 5264 83SYLVYY S010 SYLVAN OAK WAY GARRY OAK DRIVE FOREST OAK WAY 840 27 22680 24 SYLNRD S010 SYLVAN ROAD (N) GREENBACK LANE SAN JUAN AVENUE 813 21 17073 20SYLNRD S020 SYLVAN ROAD (N) SAN JUAN AVENUE WOODSIDE DRIVE 1847 26 48022 79SYLNRD S030 SYLVAN ROAD (N) WOODSIDE DRIVE CIRCUIT DRIVE 557 27 15039 51SYLNRD S040 SYLVAN ROAD (N) CIRCUIT DRIVE PARK DRIVE 332 42 13944 50 SYLNRD S050 SYLVAN ROAD (N) PARK DRIVE SYLVAN CREEK COURT 285 27 7695 53 SYLNRD S060 SYLVAN ROAD (N) SYLVAN CREEK COURT COMMUNITY DRIVE 795 27 21465 38SYLNRD S070 SYLVAN ROAD (N) COMMUNITY DRIVE ALMONDWOOD AVENUE 406 27 10962 54SYLNRD S080 SYLVAN ROAD (N) ALMONDWOOD AVENUE OLD AUBURN ROAD 883 28 24724 61 SYLSRD S010 SYLVAN ROAD (S) OLD AUBURN ROAD WOODSIDE DRIVE 3285 27 88695 47SYLSRD S020 SYLVAN ROAD (S) WOODSIDE DRIVE STOCK RANCH ROAD 1335 30 40050 53 SYLSRD S030 SYLVAN ROAD (S) STOCK RANCH ROAD SAN JUAN AVENUE 493 32 15776 71SYLSRD S040 SYLVAN ROAD (S) SAN JUAN AVENUE GREENBACK LANE 776 20 15520 43TABACT S010 TABARE COURT PARISH WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 550 26 14300 77 TALBWY S010 TALBOT WAY PHOEBE WAY END (S) 925 26 24050 48 TALBWY S020 TALBOT WAY PITALO WAY END 1562 26 40612 61
TALLCT S010 TALL BRAVE COURT FLAMING ARROW DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 301 20 8960 85 TALLCI S010 TALL TREE CIRCLE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE INDIAN RIVER DRIVE 817 20 16340 71 TALLWY S010 TALLOW WOOD WAY WOODRUFF WAY SANDALWOOD DRIVE 435 26 11310 84 29 Agenda Packet Page 206
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCITANACT S010 TANANA RIVER COURT FOREST GLEN WAY END 376 26 11849 31 TANBCT S010 TANBARK COURT NAVION DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 215 26 8476 60 TANDCT S010 TANDEM COURT AUBURN BLVD CUL‐DE‐SAC 550 26 14300 31 TANGWY S010 TANGORS WAY TROVITA WAY TROVITA WAY 533 26 13858 21 TANOWY S010 TANOAK WAY LICHEN DRIVE OUTLOOK DRIVE 1277 26 33202 77 TAREWY S010 TAREYTON WAY ANSBROUGH DRIVE COBALT WAY 1054 26 27404 89TAROWY S010 TAROCCO WAY TANGORS WAY WOODMORE OAKS 515 26 13390 77 TARTCI S010 TARTANILLA CIRCLE FAIRYTALE STREET END 678 26 17628 84 TAURCT S010 TAURUS COURT CAPRICORN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 230 26 9806 89TEATCT S010 TEATER COURT VILLA OAK DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 207 26 5382 34TERRWY S010 TERRA WAY MAUANA WAY SAN SIMEON WAY 786 26 20436 54 TERRCT S010 TERRALAND COURT SUN TERRACE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 482 26 14605 59TERRDR S010 TERRELL DRIVE GRADY DRIVE GREENBACK LANE 848 42 35616 63 THCT S010 THALIA COURT SOL WAY SOUTH END 534 28 14952 81THWY S010 THALIA WAY SOL WAY HESPERA WAY 2120 26 55120 78 THETWY S010 THETHYS WAY PHOEBE WAY PHOEBE WAY 480 26 12480 53 THRECT S010 THREE SISTERS COURT GLASS SLIPPER WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 367 26 13368 93 THRUCT S010 THRUSH COURT MERLINDALE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 324 26 11214 25TIAR S010 TIARA OLD AUBURN ROAD SAGEMENT WAY 815 26 21190 32 TIMMWY S010 TIMMERMON WAY SPERRY DRIVE SPERRY DRIVE 910 26 23660 73 TIPPWY S010 TIPPERARY WAY FARMGATE WAY LIMERICK WAY 446 26 11596 66TOMKWY S010 TOMKI WAY SOQUEL END (E) 286 26 7436 25 TRWY S010 TRAILRIDE WAY CAMPFIRE WAY SILVERSADDLE WAY 2213 26 57538 72 TRAWWY S010 TRAWLER WAY DALY AVENUE WINDLASS COURT 579 26 15054 26TREECT S010 TREE HILL COURT GOLDENWOOD CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 140 26 5798 41 TREEAV S010 TREEBINE AVENUE LICHEN DRIVE BUTTONWOOD WAY 789 34 26826 74 TREEBV S010 TREECREST AVENUE CELINE DRIVE END (E) 554 42 23268 22 TREEWY S010 TREELARK WAY LICHEN DRIVE BUTTERNUT DRIVE 1000 26 26000 31 TREEXY S010 TREELEAF WAY BUTTERNUT DRIVE LICHEN DRIVE 912 26 23712 78 TREEDT S010 TREETOP COURT OAK BEND WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 170 26 4420 63TREFCT S010 TREFOIL COURT BUTTERNUT DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 100 26 2600 26TRELCT S010 TRELLIUM COURT FIREWEED CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 150 26 3900 24 TREMDR S010 TREMAIN DRIVE WOODLOCK WAY BIX AVENUE 897 26 23322 78 TREMWY S010 TREMWELL WAY FARMGATE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 215 26 5590 51 TRENWY S010 TRENTON WAY WESTBROOK DRIVE HALIFAX STREET 1283 34 43622 66 TRILCT S010 TRILBY COURT MARIPOSA AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 466 26 14189 59 TROVST S010 TROVILLION STREET DUNMORE AVENUE GREENLEAF DRIVE 710 26 18460 30 TROVWY S010 TROVITA WAY WOODMORE OAKS CUL‐DE‐SAC 1764 26 48654 71 TUPEDR S010 TUPELO DRIVE DALY AVENUE ANTELOPE ROAD 5389 42 226338 29 TWINCT S010 TWIN BROOK COURT TWIN PARK DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 156 26 6129 67 TWINDT S010 TWIN CREEKS COURT MEADOWCREEK WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 373 26 13524 63 30 Agenda Packet Page 207
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCITWINAV S010 TWIN OAKS AVENUE OLD AUBURN ROAD END (W) 3710 43 159530 31TWINAV S020 TWIN OAKS AVENUE AUBURN BLVD 5911' E OF AUBURN BLVD 5911 26 153686 66 TWINAV S030 TWIN OAKS AVENUE 5911' E OF AUBURN BLVD END 1875 16 30000 32TWINDR S010 TWIN PARK DRIVE SUNBURST WAY WONNER WAY 725 26 18850 57 TWINWY S010 TWIN WOOD WAY SUNMIST WAY SUNBURST WAY 913 26 23738 43TWINXY S010 TWINING WAY VILLAVIEW DRIVE RADFORD STREET 1043 26 27118 70 UPCOCT S010 UP COURT EASTGATE AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 126 26 3276 28 UPLAWY S010 UPLANDS WAY MADISON AVE (W) SUNRISE BLVD 2930 26 76180 32 VALEAV S010 VALERIANA AVENUE CAMOMILE WAY END (E) 488 26 12688 51VALEAV S020 VALERIANA AVENUE AMSTERDAM AVENUE END 495 26 12870 79 VANNLN S010 VAN MAREN LANE (N) AUBURN BLVD SOMERSWORTH DRIVE 580 24 13920 40 VANNLN S020 VAN MAREN LANE (N) SOMERSWORTH DRIVE KITTERY AVENUE 1273 26 33098 34 VANNLN S030 VAN MAREN LANE (N) KITTERY AVENUE WINLOCK AVENUE 765 22 16830 65 VANNLN S040 VAN MAREN LANE (N) WINLOCK AVENUE CANDELABRA DRIVE 832 22 18304 74 VANNLN S050 VAN MAREN LANE (N) CANDELABRA DRIVE CALVIN DRIVE 1253 11 13783 65VANNLN S060 VAN MAREN LANE (N) CALVIN DRIVE GARDEN GATE DRIVE 551 18 9918 59 VANNLN S070 VAN MAREN LANE (N) GARDEN GATE DRIVE MARINVALE DRIVE 576 20 11520 67 VANNLN S080 VAN MAREN LANE (N) MARINVALE DRIVE FLORABELLE AVENUE 696 20 13920 71VANNLN S090 VAN MAREN LANE (N) FLORABELLE AVENUE PURSLANE WAY 338 30 10140 74 VANNLN S100 VAN MAREN LANE (N) GREENBACK LANE MERCEDES AVENUE 803 33 26499 66 VANNLN S110 VAN MAREN LANE (N) MERCEDES AVENUE AUBURN BLVD 2400 33 79200 50 VANSLN S010 VAN MAREN LANE (S) PURSLANE WAY NAVION DRIVE 355 30 10650 37 VANSLN S020 VAN MAREN LANE (S) NAVION DRIVE SKYLANE DRIVE 1880 22 41360 70 VANSLN S030 VAN MAREN LANE (S) SKYLANE DRIVE MISTY CREEK DRIVE 576 24 13824 60VANSLN S040 VAN MAREN LANE (S) MISTY CREEK DRIVE BRIDGEMONT WAY 1398 21 29358 76VANSLN S050 VAN MAREN LANE (S) BRIDGEMONT WAY CAMPFIRE WAY 1097 18 19746 60VANSLN S060 VAN MAREN LANE (S) CAMPFIRE WAY HORSEMAN WAY 680 40 27200 32VANSLN S070 VAN MAREN LANE (S) HORSEMAN WAY OAK LAKES LANE 693 36 24948 45 VANSLN S080 VAN MAREN LANE (S) OAK LAKES LANE AUBURN BLVD 444 24 10656 42 VANSLN S090 VAN MAREN LANE (S) AUBURN BLVD DONEGAL DRIVE 2011 29 58319 50VANSLN S100 VAN MAREN LANE (S) DONEGAL DRIVE BREMAN DRIVE 914 24 21936 53 VANSLN S110 VAN MAREN LANE (S) BREMAN DRIVE GREENBACK LANE 235 37 8695 51VERBCT S010 VERBENA COURT FLORABELLE AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 154 26 7830 6 VERHCT S010 VERHOVEN COURT LIALANA WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 221 26 8255 21 VERNAV S010 VERNER AVENUE CITY LIMITS (S) END (N) 4459 24 107016 36VERNDR S010 VERNON OAKS DRIVE WHYTE AVENUE CITY LIMITS 955 36 34380 72 VICEWY S010 VICEROY WAY NORTHRIDGE END (E) 1814 26 49954 33 VILLDR S010 VILLA OAK DRIVE FAIR OAKS BLVD OLIVINE AVENUE 3282 42 137844 69 VILLER S010 VILLAVIEW DRIVE SUMMERPLACE DRIVE LICHEN DRIVE 4134 36 148824 50 VISCWY S010 VISCOUNT WAY ZENITH DRIVE WOODYARD WAY 1216 26 31616 67 VISTDR S010 VISTARIDGE DRIVE SUNRISE BLVD END (E) 961 36 34596 61 31 Agenda Packet Page 208
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIVOLEWY S010 VOLLE WAY SOUTH END THALIA WAY 130 26 3380 84 VOLTWY S010 VOLTA WAY CESSNA DRIVE END 150 26 3900 78
VOYAWY S010 VOYAGER WAY NAVION DRIVE SKYLANE DRIVE 540 26 14040 20 WACNWY S010 WACHTEL WAY (N) OAK AVENUE OLD AUBURN ROAD 5847 20 116940 50 WACSWY S010 WACHTEL WAY (S) OLD AUBURN ROAD PONTICELLI WAY 1535 17 26095 72 WACSWY S020 WACHTEL WAY (S) PONTICELLI WAY PITALO WAY 1371 17 23307 66WACSWY S030 WACHTEL WAY (S) PITALO WAY OLIVINE AVENUE 789 16 12624 61WACSWY S040 WACHTEL WAY (S) OLIVINE AVENUE ANDRE COURT 384 19 7296 73 WACSWY S050 WACHTEL WAY (S) ANDRE COURT OAK AVENUE 1744 20 34880 59 WALKCT S010 WALKING STICK COURT INDIAN RIVER DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 276 26 7176 29 WALLCT S010 WALLWOOD COURT BROCKWOOD WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 417 26 12999 69WALNDR S010 WALNUT DRIVE AUBURN BLVD HOLLY DRIVE 1300 26 33800 31 WALNDR S020 WALNUT DRIVE DEAD END (W) MARIPOSA AVENUE 1073 20 21460 27WAPIPL S010 WAPITI PLACE SAGINAW WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 382 26 11842 63 WATSWY S010 WATSON WAY MARIPOSA AVENUE AUBURN BLVD 2544 24 61056 21 WATSWY S020 WATSON WAY MARIPOSA AVENUE ANTELOPE ROAD 2260 22 49720 40WEDDCT S010 WEDDELL COURT TALBOT WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 234 26 6084 40 WELLAV S010 WELLS AVENUE SOUTHGROVE DRIVE SAN JUAN AVENUE 680 26 17680 26WELLWY S010 WELLSBORO WAY MELBOURNE WAY WESTBROOK DRIVE 825 26 21450 57 WESWWY S010 WES WAY OLD AUBURN ROAD KAREN RAE COURT 678 26 17628 75WESWWY S020 WES WAY END (W) LINDA VISTA DR 222 24 5328 39 WESTCT S010 WEST OAK COURT COPPER OAK COURT CUL‐DE‐SAC 234 26 9910 30 WESTDR S010 WESTBROOK DRIVE HALIFAX STREET END 4655 34 158270 28 WESTWY S010 WESTCHESTER WAY COBALT WAY WINLOCK AVENUE 2348 34 79832 66 WESTER S010 WESTGATE DRIVE SAN JUAN AVENUE FARMGATE WAY 2308 26 60008 65 WETZCT S010 WETZEL COURT CLAYPOOL WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 129 26 3354 57 WHALCT S010 WHALER COURT WINDJAMMER WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 376 26 12471 4 WHITCT S010 WHITE BIRCH COURT RED MAPLE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 145 26 3770 70 WHITDT S010 WHITE CLOUD COURT BIG ARROW COURT CUL‐DE‐SAC 226 20 4520 54 WHITET S010 WHITEPLAINS COURT BLUE SPRINGS WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 224 26 7734 14WHYTAV S010 WHYTE AVENUE ROSEVILLE ROAD CITY LIMITS 3767 26 97942 28 WICKDR S010 WICKHAM DRIVE OLD AUBURN ROAD COTTINGHAM COURT 1412 26 36712 45 WILDDR S010 WILD OAK DRIVE MAR VISTA WAY TUPELO DRIVE 410 34 13940 4 WILDWY S010 WILDWOOD WAY PRIMROSE DRIVE UPLANDS WAY 1495 34 50830 29 WILLDR S010 WILLOW CREEK DRIVE SAN JUAN AVENUE END (S) 1037 29 30073 48WILLCT S010 WILLOW GLEN COURT LARWIN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 538 26 16778 74WILLWY S010 WILLOW TREE WAY CLOVERLEAF WAY CLOVERLEAF WAY 631 26 16406 22 WIWY S010 WILLOW WAY AUBURN BLVD EAST END 811 28 22708 50WILLER S010 WILLOWLEAF DRIVE NAVION DRIVE MISTY CREEK DRIVE 1980 26 51480 19WINDWY S010 WIND WAY KINGSWOOD DRIVE WILDWOOD WAY 329 26 8554 27 WINDXY S010 WINDFALL WAY BLACK OAKS WAY RUSCH DRIVE 635 26 16510 35 32 Agenda Packet Page 209
8/5/2022
City of Citrus Heights
Pavement Condition Index ‐ Sorted by Name
StreetID SectionID StreetName BegLocation EndLocation Length (ft) Width (ft) Area (sf) PCIWINDYY S010 WINDJAMMER WAY CATAMARAN DRIVE DALY AVENUE 2064 26 53664 35WINDCT S010 WINDLASS COURT TRAWLER WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 420 26 10920 75 WINLAV S010 WINLOCK AVENUE RAINTREE DRIVE VAN MAREN LANE 3168 36 114048 62 WINTDR S010 WINTERGREEN DRIVE VILLA OAK DRIVE OLD AUBURN ROAD 2175 42 91350 42 WISDR S010 WISCONSIN DR SAN JUAN AVENUE SOUTHGROVE DR 1237 16 19792 11 WITCCT S010 WITCHINGHOUR COURT RAINTREE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 390 26 13966 72WONDST S010 WONDER STREET ANTELOPE ROAD END 2565 26 66690 38 WONNWY S010 WONNER WAY TWIN PARK DRIVE END (S) 485 26 12610 63WOODWY S010 WOODBRIAR WAY WOODGLADE AVENUE WOODGLADE AVENUE 865 26 22490 21 WOODCT S010 WOODBROOK COURT GOLDENWOOD CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 137 26 5553 30 WOOEWY S010 WOODCHUCK WAY FAIR OAKS BLVD CHIPMUNK WAY 1572 26 40872 26 WOODDR S010 WOODCREEK DRIVE PARKVIEW WAY END (W) 953 34 32402 37WOOFWY S010 WOODDALE WAY LIN OAK WAY OLD AUBURN BLVD 3157 26 82082 74 WOODDT S010 WOODENDALE COURT GOLDENWOOD CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 210 26 7451 24 WOODET S010 WOODENFIELD COURT GOLDENWOOD CIRCLE CUL‐DE‐SAC 206 26 7347 26WOODAV S010 WOODGLADE AV SAYBROOK DRIVE WOODBRIAR WAY 1460 36 52560 28 WOOGWY S010 WOODHILLS WAY PARKOAKS DRIVE OAKCREEK WAY 1125 26 29250 30WOODFT S010 WOODHURST COURT OAKSIDE DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 224 26 5824 33 WOOHWY S010 WOODLOCK WAY HILLTREE AVENUE END (W) 853 26 22178 81 WOOD S010 WOODMORE OAKS FAIR OAKS BLVD SUNRISE BLVD 2578 26 67028 65 WOODGT S010 WOODOAKS COURT OAKCREEK WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 135 26 3510 42 WOOIWY S010 WOODPARK WAY DEWEY DRIVE OAKBROOK DRIVE 1008 26 26208 71 WOODHT S010 WOODRIDGE COURT PARKOAKS DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 257 26 6682 26 WOOJWY S010 WOODRUFF WAY BLACK OAKS WAY END (E) 1757 26 45682 44 WOODER S005 WOODSIDE DRIVE SYLVAN ROAD EAST END 219 26 5694 25 WOODER S010 WOODSIDE DRIVE SYLVAN ROAD BRIDGE 415 42 17430 59 WOODER S020 WOODSIDE DRIVE BRIDGE STOCK RANCH ROAD 1485 42 62370 78WOOKWY S010 WOODYARD WAY OUTLOOK DRIVE BUTTERNUT DRIVE 1089 26 28314 63 YARDWY S010 YARDGATE WAY OUTLOOK DRIVE VISCOUNT WAY 572 26 14872 69 YARDXY S010 YARDLEY WAY TWINING WAY VILLAVIEW DRIVE 870 26 22620 82YARRWY S010 YARROW WAY STACEY HILLS DRIVE QUIET OAK COURT 2171 26 56446 28 YAWLCT S010 YAWL COURT CATAMARAN DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 130 26 5710 89 YEOMWY S010 YEOMAN WAY ENVOY WAY FARMGATE WAY 1183 26 30758 62 ZANCCT S010 ZANCANARO COURT OLIVINE AVENUE CUL‐DE‐SAC 526 26 13676 56ZEELDR S010 ZEELAND DRIVE HENNING DR END (E) 790 34 26860 30 ZENIDR S010 ZENITH DRIVE OUTLOOK DRIVE BUTTERNUT DRIVE 903 42 37926 67 ZENIDR S020 ZENITH DRIVE ANTELOPE ROAD OUTLOOK DRIVE 3489 42 146538 32 ZEPHCT S010 ZEPHYR CREEK COURT KEESEE WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 248 26 8439 72 ZIEBCT S010 ZIEBELL COURT VILLA OAK DRIVE CUL‐DE‐SAC 708 26 18408 37 ZIEGCT S010 ZIEGLER CT AVALOS WAY CUL‐DE‐SAC 317 26 8242 33 33 Agenda Packet Page 210
8/5/2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 22, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Meghan Huber, Economic Development &
Community Engagement Director
SUBJECT: Guideline Approval and Funding Allocation for the Community Projects Grant Program
Summary and Recommendation
At the May 10, 2022, Strategic Planning Retreat, City Council set a strategic goal to “Present to City Council for consideration, a proposal that would provide grants to community groups to facilitate community projects that engage citizens, improve the community, and promotes community involvement and pride.”
The Citrus Heights Community Projects Grant would be available to any 501c3, community group, or organization to implement projects or host events that improve the quality of life and promotes community connection and engagement.
Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-xxxx, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights approving the Citrus Heights Community Projects Grant guidelines and allocating $50,000 in American Rescue Plan Act funding to administer the pilot round of the program.
Fiscal Impact
Staff recommends an allocation of $50,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding to launch the pilot application round of the Community Projects Grant. Subsequent funding recommendations for future rounds will be based on the pilot round’s program subscription and forecasted future use. The program can utilize ARPA funding through December 2026, with the final allocations taking place by December 2024.
Following is a summary of American Rescue Plan Act funding to date:
Item 15 Agenda Packet Page 211
Subject: Guideline Approval and Funding Allocation for the Community Projects Grant Program Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
ARPA FUNDING ALLOCATION SUMMARY
Total City Allocation $15,676,972
Police Department Staffing – FY 2021/22 ($1,568,805)
Police Department Staffing – FY 2022/23 ($2,811,775)
Small Business COVID Recovery Program (281,111)
Beautification Crew ($875,000)
Community Block Party Trailer ($50,000)
Police Fleet Vehicles and Equipment ($1,400,00)
Police Department Communications Center Critical Needs ($600,000) Total Allocation Remaining $8,090,281
Background and Analysis
Community feedback indicates that Citrus Heights residents desire increased community connectivity. In the recently Council adopted Focus Area Work Plan, staff curated an extensive series of recommendations utilizing American Rescue Plan Act funding to meet this community desire and achieve results. Recommendations are a combination of city-produced events, community engagement programming, and outreach with Community grant programs where funding can be used to seed new community events and projects that achieve connection. At the City Council, Strategic Planning Retreat on May 10, 2022, City Council adopted a strategic goal for staff to “Present to City Council for consideration, a proposal that would provide grants to community groups to facilitate community projects that engage citizens, improve the community and promotes community involvement and pride.”
Grant Program Scope
The Citrus Heights Community Projects Grant Program will provide grants to community groups to implement special projects in the community to engage citizens in creative efforts to improve the community and promote community involvement, connection, and pride. Community groups will be responsible for proposing, designing, and implementing the project. Community groups meeting the eligibility criteria may apply for a grant. Applying is not a guarantee of funding.
Eligibility
The Community Grants program is intended to spark the innovative, positive ideas that exist in Citrus Heights. For this reason, staff thinks it easier to explain what is not eligible so that ideas are not do not limited.
The program will not consider grant proposals for:
• Retroactive funding for projects already completed
• Salaries for permanent employees
• Replacement of funding for preexisting community projects or programs Agenda Packet Page 212
Subject: Guideline Approval and Funding Allocation for the Community Projects Grant Program Date: September 22, 2022
Printed on Recycled Paper
• Start-up programs that require ongoing funding that is not available at time of application • One-time, individual benefit activities (no Eagle Scout projects, study trips, library memberships or similar)
• Organizations that have received more than $75,000 in grant funding from the city in the current or previous fiscal year
• Projects or activities identified with political parties • Organizations that practice discrimination of any kind • General contributions to larger capital projects
Citrus Heights community groups, community organizations and non-profits are encouraged to apply. If there are individual residents that have an idea or interest in implementing a project or event but who are not affiliated with a community group, Community Engagement will connect them with their Neighborhood Association or other best fit group as a project sponsor organization.
Application Process
A 45-day online application period for the Citrus Heights Community Projects Grant Program will open in the first quarter of 2023. Marketing would begin in advance of the application period and last through the 45-day application window. Community Engagement staff will create inspirational marketing materials to germinate project ideas and perform direct outreach to community groups to generate awareness, interest, and project ideas.
To ensure all Citrus Heights community groups have an equal opportunity to apply for a grant, outreach efforts will be as robust and wide-ranging as possible. They will occur both before and after the application period opens. General outreach efforts will include press releases and enews, social media, announcements, and reminders at public meetings, and direct outreach to all community groups for which the City has contact information. Staff will also inform and engage the Connect Citrus Heights coalition of community groups to promote the program. A staff member will liaison with interested groups to vet project ideas and assist with application submissions.
The application form will review the following areas of a proposed project to ensure alignment with the grant program goals of achievable implementation and increasing community connection:
1. Project/Program Goal: List the goal(s) of the proposed project/program.
2. Expected Community Involvement: Indicate how many people the program will help and who will be the most directly affected.
3. Project/Program Action Plan: List the steps to complete the project/program.
4. Project/Program Maintenance: Describe how you will monitor progress to identify what works and needs improvement. If the project is ongoing, indicate how the project/program will remain sustainable after the grant.
5. Significance: Indicate how the project/program is innovative and will advance community connection, engagement, and/or pride for Citrus Heights residents.
Agenda Packet Page 213
Subject: Guideline Approval and Funding Allocation for the Community Projects Grant Program Date: September 22, 2022