Agenda packet, regular meeting, fourth session — Citrus Heights City Council Meetings, July 8, 2026 (part 5 of 5)

ITEM 11
Intersection Crashes Local CCR Differential1 EPDO
2 Fatal Serious Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain PDO Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Head On Hit Object Overturned Other Pedestrian Bicycle Aggressive Distracted Impaired Dark Wet Motorcycle SAN JUAN AVE & SPERRY DR 18 -0.09 107 7 4 7 10 2 6 10 4 4 SUNRISE BLVD & OAK AVE 18 -0.21 63 2 5 11 1 10 2 4 1 13 1 5 1 1 AUBURN BLVD & CARLETON LN 18 -0.13 182 1 2 5 10 1 3 8 1 3 1 1 6 2 3 8 1 BRIMSTONE DR & ANTELOPE RD 18 -0.26 88 4 6 8 5 2 10 1 15 1 5 1 SUNRISE BLVD & ARCADE LAKE LN 17 -0.22 57 2 4 11 2 1 9 1 3 1 12 2 3 9 3 FAIR OAKS BLVD & OLD AUBURN RD 17 -0.05 52 1 5 11 1 7 8 1 11 2 6 5 FAIR OAKS BLVD & GREENBACK LN 16 -0.19 51 1 5 10 4 3 6 2 1 8 1 MARIPOSA AVE & ANTELOPE RD 15 -0.18 279 1 1 5 8 5 4 3 1 2 8 1 4 5 2 1 AUBURN BLVD & MANZANITA AVE 15 -0.22 396 1 2 2 1 9 2 4 2 6 1 6 2 6 2 SUNRISE BLVD & WOODMORE OAKS DR 14 -0.26 158 1 2 1 10 2 3 6 3 6 7 1 BINET DR & GREENBACK LN 13 -0.29 173 1 1 6 5 5 2 3 2 1 8 1 1 2 ANTELOPE RD & OLD AUBURN RD 13 -0.14 48 2 3 8 3 3 6 1 9 1 5 2 1 FAIR OAKS BLVD & OAK AVE 12 -0.24 52 2 4 6 1 1 10 10 2 4 1 CARRIAGE DR & AUBURN BLVD 11 -0.26 51 1 6 4 5 1 4 1 6 1 4 LAUPPE LN & ANTELOPE RD 11 -0.29 55 4 1 6 3 3 4 1 6 1 1 2 1 2 AUBURN BLVD & TWIN OAKS AVE 11 -0.27 61 2 6 3 2 1 5 1 1 1 8 2 2 SAN TOMAS DR & AUBURN BLVD 10 -0.26 36 5 5 2 7 1 7 1 2 1 APPLEBEES DWY & AUBURN BLVD 10 -0.26 30 1 2 7 3 1 4 2 3 2 1 3 1 1 PRIMROSE DR & MADISON AVE 9 -0.35 34 2 1 6 3 2 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 WILKINS WAY & GREENBACK LN 9 -0.34 267 2 1 2 4 1 1 2 1 2 2 6 5 3 SAYBROOK DR & ANTELOPE RD 9 -0.32 19 1 8 1 2 3 3 4 1 1
AMSTERDAM AVE & ANTELOPE RD 9 -0.32 39 2 2 5 2 1 4 1 1 4 1 2 FAIR OAKS BLVD & SUNRISE EAST WAY 8 -0.24 33 2 1 5 1 2 4 1 5 2 AUBURN BLVD & GRAND OAKS BLVD 8 -0.33 33 2 1 5 1 2 2 1 1 1 4 1 2 1 AUBURN BLVD & ROLLINGWOOD BLVD 8 -0.32 137 1 2 5 4 1 1 2 2 2 7 1 1 SUNRISE BLVD & TWIN OAKS AVE 8 -0.35 38 2 2 4 1 1 3 2 1 5 1 2 1 1 MARIPOSA AVE & OLD AUBURN RD 8 -0.29 32 2 1 5 1 2 3 1 1 4 2 3 1 AUBURN BLVD & KANAI AVE 7 -0.34 17 2 5 2 2 2 1 4 2 4 1
SAN JUAN AVE & WILLOWCREEK DR 6 -0.36 31 2 1 3 4 1 1 1 3 3 3

Page 2 of 9 ends

ITEM 11
Intersection Crashes Local CCR Differential1 EPDO
2 Fatal Serious Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain PDO Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Head On Hit Object Overturned Other Pedestrian Bicycle Aggressive Distracted Impaired Dark Wet Motorcycle FAIR OAKS BLVD & TREECREST AVE 6 -0.33 45 3 2 1 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 ROSSWOOD DR & ANTELOPE RD 6 -0.37 21 1 1 4 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 SYLVAN RD & STOCK RANCH RD 5 -0.38 134 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 3
HALIFAX ST & AUBURN BLVD 5 -0.32 29 2 1 2 3 2 4
TWIN OAKS AVE & OLD AUBURN RD 3 -0.43 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUNRISE BLVD & SUNRISE MALL DWY 3 -0.43 8 1 2 1 1 1
Unsignalized Intersections
SUNRISE BLVD & S SUNRISE MALL/BIRDCAGE CTR 27 0.21 672 3 4 7 13 9 5 6 1 3 2 1 8 2 2 5 2 2 DESIMONE LN & GREENBACK LN 20 0.08 445 2 3 3 12 1 5 1 11 2 8 1 6 13 4 2 SHUPE DR & GREENBACK LN 19 0.07 94 4 7 8 5 6 4 1 3 2 2 3 2 MATHENY WAY & GREENBACK LN 18 0.03 77 4 4 10 2 5 4 7 5 7 1 SYLVAN RD & GREENBACK LN 17 0.22 62 2 5 10 6 1 5 1 2 2 5 1 8 5 PATTERSON LN & GREENBACK LN 16 0.19 231 1 1 3 11 5 1 4 4 2 2 2 5 2 AUBURN BLVD & DESIMONE LN 14 0.36 59 3 3 8 3 1 1 8 1 3 1 4 6 1 MERLINDALE DR & GREENBACK LN 14 0.01 244 1 2 4 7 5 2 6 1 3 1 5 3 1 KENNETH AVE & OAK AVE 13 0.42 252 1 4 2 6 8 3 1 1 6 4 1 1 AUBURN BLVD & SHADOW LN 12 0.07 61 4 2 6 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 5 1 SYLVAN RD & SYLVAN RD 12 0.08 242 1 3 2 6 5 1 1 3 2 2 1 3 AUBURN BLVD & SYCAMORE DR 12 0.06 256 1 5 1 5 7 1 1 2 1 1 4 6 2 ROLLINGWOOD BLVD & ANTELOPE RD 12 0.03 61 4 2 6 2 1 6 1 1 1 6 1 2 1 1 1 SAN JUAN AVE & NORTHLEA WAY 10 0.05 230 1 2 2 5 1 7 2 5 1 3 SUNRISE VISTA DR & GREENBACK LN 10 -0.01 235 1 2 3 4 4 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 5 2 TERRELL DR & GREENBACK LN 10 -0.03 49 3 2 5 4 4 1 1 2
COUNTRY LN & GREENBACK LN 10 -0.05 15 1 9 3 5 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 FAIR OAKS BLVD & WOODMORE OAKS DR 10 0.16 235 1 2 3 4 7 2 1 8 2 1 3 1 MANGO TREE WAY & ANTELOPE RD 10 0.01 254 1 4 3 2 4 1 5 1 1 2 6 1 1 ANTELOPE RD & ANTELOPE PLAZA DWY 10 -0.04 20 1 9 3 5 1 1 4 1 1 SUNRISE BLVD & HANSON AVE 10 -0.02 231 1 6 3 5 2 3 3 3 1 1 AUBURN BLVD & AUBURN BLVD 9 0.01 54 3 3 3 2 1 5 1 4

Page 3 of 9 ends

ITEM 11
Intersection Crashes Local CCR Differential1 EPDO
2 Fatal Serious Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain PDO Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Head On Hit Object Overturned Other Pedestrian Bicycle Aggressive Distracted Impaired Dark Wet Motorcycle HILLTREE AVE & GREENBACK LN 9 -0.04 409 2 1 2 4 4 1 1 2 1 2 5 4 1 BROOKTREE DR & GREENBACK LN 9 -0.04 219 1 1 2 5 5 2 1 1 2 1 1 EVESHAM CIR & AUBURN BLVD 9 0.02 39 2 2 5 3 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 SUNRISE BLVD & LARWIN DR 9 -0.03 410 2 4 3 2 1 3 2 1 5 2 5 1 RAINTREE DR & AUBURN BLVD 9 0.02 24 1 1 7 1 3 3 2 3 4 1 1 VAN MAREN LN & NAVION DR 9 0.10 24 3 6 2 2 1 4 3 2 4 2
AUBURN BLVD & LONDA VISTA MHP 9 0.01 9 9 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 ANTELOPE RD & WATSON WAY 9 0.02 228 1 3 5 1 1 6 1 5 4 3 SUNRISE EAST WAY & TARGA CIR 8 0.84 13 1 7 1 4 2 1 4 2 4 1 AUBURN BLVD & CROSSWOODS PKWY 8 -0.01 238 1 3 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 2 3 1 AUBURN BLVD & RAMONA LN 8 -0.01 23 3 5 3 3 2 2 1 3
CANELO HILLS DR & OAK AVE 8 0.26 227 1 3 4 4 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 AUBURN BLVD & COOK AVE 8 -0.01 38 2 2 4 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 4 1 1 ALMADEN WAY & MADISON AVE 7 -0.07 392 2 1 4 3 1 2 1 1 3 2 HERITAGE TREE LN & MADISON AVE 7 -0.03 42 2 3 2 3 1 3 2 1 4 BIRDCAGE ST & FARMGATE WAY 7 0.28 22 3 4 1 6 3 2
DEWEY DR & MEADOWCREEK WAY 7 -0.02 32 2 1 4 5 2 2 1
GREENBACK LN & CALIFORNIA AVE 7 -0.07 51 4 1 2 2 3 2 3 1 PARIS ST & GREENBACK LN 8 -0.05 203 1 1 6 1 2 2 2 1 4 2 1 COBALT WAY & AUBURN BLVD 7 -0.02 217 1 1 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 VAN MAREN LN & CALVIN DR 7 0.05 41 3 1 3 1 3 3 3 2 3 1
BONITA WAY & OLD AUBURN RD 7 0.01 236 1 4 2 2 1 3 1 4 1 4 1 GLEN TREE DR & OLD AUBURN RD 7 0.40 41 3 1 3 3 1 2 1 2 2 1 ANTELOPE RD & ANTELOPE RD 7 0.03 32 2 1 4 6 1 1 1 1 2
SUMMERPLACE DR & ANTELOPE RD 7 0.05 37 2 2 3 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 SUNRISE BLVD & SUNRISE WOODS DWY 7 -0.06 22 3 4 2 1 2 2 3 1 1 AUBURN BLVD & CRIPPLE CREEK RD 7 -0.03 222 1 1 3 2 1 1 4 1 1 1 7 1 AUBURN BLVD & CEDAR DR 7 -0.03 46 3 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 2
AUBURN BLVD & LOHSE WAY 7 -0.03 42 2 3 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1

Page 4 of 9 ends

ITEM 11
Intersection Crashes Local CCR Differential1 EPDO
2 Fatal Serious Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain PDO Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Head On Hit Object Overturned Other Pedestrian Bicycle Aggressive Distracted Impaired Dark Wet Motorcycle AUBURN BLVD & BAIRD WAY 7 -0.03 217 1 2 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 AUBURN BLVD & SUN AVE 7 -0.04 17 2 5 4 2 1 3 1
FLEETWOOD DR & MADISON AVE 6 5.42 16 1 5 1 1 4 1 2 3
HIGHVIEW LN & MADISON AVE 6 -0.08 16 2 4 1 2 3 1 1
DEWEY DR & DUNMORE AVE 6 -0.04 11 1 5 2 2 2 1 1
OAKSIDE DR & GREENBACK LN 6 -0.08 21 1 1 4 4 2 4 1 1 2 1 SAN PABLO DR & BURICH AVE 6 0.50 11 1 5 2 2 1 1 1 1 4
FAIR OAKS BLVD & WOODLAKE HILLS DR 6 0.03 26 1 2 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 DONEGAL DR & AUBURN BLVD 6 -0.04 221 1 1 3 1 6 1 2
SYLVAN RD & CORONADO LN 6 0.03 201 1 1 4 1 4 1 1 3 3 1
MARIPOSA AVE & PRINCE ST 6 0.98 25 2 4 1 1 2 2 3 2 5 1
VAN MAREN LN & CANDELABRA DR 6 0.02 36 1 4 1 1 3 2 3 1 2 SUNRISE BLVD & VISTA RIDGE DR 6 -0.07 11 1 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 POPLAR AVE & ANTELOPE RD 6 -0.06 40 3 1 2 1 1 4 3 1
OAKWOOD LN & ANTELOPE RD 6 -0.06 26 1 2 3 1 4 1 3 1
WACHTEL WAY & OLD AUBURN RD 6 0.01 31 1 3 2 5 1 3 3 1
AUBURN BLVD & WALNUT DR 6 -0.05 11 1 5 2 1 1 1 1 1 2
AUBURN BLVD & LINDEN AVE 6 -0.05 16 2 4 2 1 3 1 3 1
FAIR OAKS BLVD & COLDANI ST 6 -0.01 206 1 1 4 1 4 1 1 2 3 1 2 FORBOROUGH DWY & ANTELOPE RD 5 -0.06 214 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 FAIR OAKS BLVD & WELLES LN 5 -0.01 395 2 1 2 4 1 3 3
UPLANDS WAY & MADISON AVE 5 -0.10 5 5 2 2 1 1 3 1
GREENBACK LN & THE RENAISSANCE DWY 5 -0.09 26 1 2 2 2 3 2 3 VILLAGE WAY & MADISON AVE 5 -0.10 220 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 4 1 BIRDCAGE ST & MACY PLAZA DR 5 0.08 10 1 4 1 4 2 1 4 1
MARIPOSA AVE & FARMGATE WAY 5 0.21 15 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 SAN JUAN AVE & WESTGATE DR 5 -0.06 205 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 SAN JUAN AVE & LUCKY LN 5 -0.06 10 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1
SYLVAN RD & STODDARD LN 5 -0.07 24 2 3 1 4 1 3 4 1

Page 5 of 9 ends

ITEM 11
Intersection Crashes Local CCR Differential1 EPDO
2 Fatal Serious Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain PDO Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Head On Hit Object Overturned Other Pedestrian Bicycle Aggressive Distracted Impaired Dark Wet Motorcycle SYLVAN RD & WOODSIDE DR 5 -0.07 30 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
SUNRISE BLVD & TALL RIVER DR 5 -0.09 20 1 1 3 1 3 1 2 2 SYLVAN RD & CIRCUIT DR 5 -0.07 15 1 4 2 2 1 1 1 3 1
SYLVAN RD & SYLVAN VALLEY WAY 5 -0.07 20 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 FRONTAGE RD & AUBURN BLVD 5 -0.07 25 1 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 2
VAN MAREN LN & BRIDGEMONT WAY 5 -0.02 10 1 4 2 2 1 1 1 2 VAN MAREN LN & MISTY CREEK DR 5 -0.02 15 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 SUNRISE BLVD & SUNRISE OAKS DWY 5 -0.09 15 2 3 1 4 4 1
TAD LN & OLD AUBURN RD 5 0.05 15 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 1
AUBURN BLVD & PRATT AVE 5 -0.07 30 2 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 FORBOROUGH W DWY & ANTELOPE RD 5 -0.07 35 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 COLOGNE WAY & ANTELOPE RD 5 -0.08 35 2 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 BRIMSTONE DR & ZENITH DR 5 0.41 195 1 4 2 2 1 2 2 4
SUNRISE BLVD & ARBORELLE DWY 5 -0.09 15 1 4 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 SAN JUAN AVE & WELLS AVE 4 -0.09 14 2 2 2 2 3 1
CELINE DR & KINGSWOOD DR 4 0.07 4 4 2 2 1 2 1
FARMGATE WAY & BIRDCAGE VILLAGE DWY 4 0.89 23 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 PRIMROSE DR & FARMGATE WAY 4 0.89 4 4 1 1 2 2 3
BIRDCAGE ST & BIRDCAGE VILLAGE DWY 4 0.04 29 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 SHADOW LN & SHADOW LN 4 0.48 4 4 2 2 3 1 1
LONGFORD DR & GREENBACK LN 4 -0.10 14 2 2 4 4 1 1
7532 GREENBACK LN DWY & GREENBACK LN 4 -0.10 9 1 3 1 2 1 2 VAN MAREN LN & MERCEDES AVE 4 -0.06 204 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 CREEKBED LN & AUBURN BLVD 4 -0.08 194 1 3 1 1 1 1 1
SANTA CATARINA WAY & SAN SIMEON DR 4 0.32 9 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 3 ROSEVILLE RD AND WHYTE AVE 4 0.01 23 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FAIR OAKS BLVD & COPPERWOOD DR 4 -0.07 14 1 3 2 1 1 1 2 SUNRISE BLVD & MCLIN WAY 4 -0.10 19 1 1 2 3 1 3 1 1
TUPELO DR & GLENHURST WAY 4 0.34 19 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2

Page 6 of 9 ends

ITEM 11
Intersection Crashes Local CCR Differential1 EPDO
2 Fatal Serious Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain PDO Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Head On Hit Object Overturned Other Pedestrian Bicycle Aggressive Distracted Impaired Dark Wet Motorcycle MENKE WAY & OAK AVE 4 -0.05 14 1 3 1 1 2 3 1
LOI LINDA LN & OLD AUBURN RD 4 -0.08 204 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 VAN MAREN LN & MARINVALE DR 4 -0.06 9 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 2
LONDA VISTA MHP & LONDA VISTA MHP 4 0.89 194 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 TUPELO DR & ANTELOPE PLAZA DWY 4 0.34 19 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 ANTELOPE HILLS DWY & ANTELOPE RD 4 -0.09 9 1 3 3 1 1 2 3 2 AUBURN BLVD & WATSON WAY 4 -0.09 9 1 3 1 3 1 1 4 1
BRIMSTONE DR & LICHEN DR 4 -0.01 14 1 3 1 2 1 2
SUMMERPLACE DR & CARMELWOOD DR 4 0.80 4 4 3 1 3 2
AUBURN BLVD & OAK GROVE AVE 4 -0.09 14 2 2 2 2 1 1
BUTTERNUT DR & LICHEN DR 4 0.29 14 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1
MARIPOSA AVE & TWIN OAKS AVE 4 0.25 14 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ROSEVILLE RD & BUTTERNUT DR 4 -0.13 29 2 1 1 4 1 1 1
LINDA SUE WAY & MADISON AVE 3 -0.12 8 1 2 1 2 2
VENTANA PL & MADISON AVE 3 -0.12 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
SUNRISE BLVD & PEBBLE BEACH DR 3 -0.12 193 1 2 2 1 2 1
BIRDCAGE ST & KINGSWOOD DR 3 -0.05 8 1 2 2 1 1 2
AUBURN BLVD & IMPERIAL WAY 3 -0.09 8 1 2 2 1 2 2
SHUPE DR & SPERRY DR 3 0.17 8 1 2 1 1 1 1
DEWEY DR & GREENCREEK WAY 3 -0.11 22 2 1 1 1 1 1 2
MARIPOSA AVE & RITA LOU WAY 3 0.02 13 1 2 1 1 1
SHADOW LN & SHADOW LN 3 0.17 3 3 1 1 1 1
BIRDCAGE CENTER DWY & GREENBACK LN 3 -0.12 3 3 2 1 1
MARIPOSA AVE & WOODGLEN DWY 3 0.04 3 3 1 1 1 1
DENTON WAY & SUN HILL DR 3 0.07 3 3 1 2 1 1
VAN MAREN LN & DONEGAL DR 3 -0.10 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 1
CHARWOOD LN & AUBURN BLVD 3 -0.08 203 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MARIPOSA AVE & SAN SIMEON DR 3 0.08 8 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1
FOUNTAIN SQUARE DR & WOODSIDE DR 3 -0.04 3 3 1 2 2 1 1

Page 7 of 9 ends

ITEM 11
Intersection Crashes Local CCR Differential1 EPDO
2 Fatal Serious Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain PDO Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Head On Hit Object Overturned Other Pedestrian Bicycle Aggressive Distracted Impaired Dark Wet Motorcycle THALIA WAY & WOODSIDE DR 3 0.33 22 2 1 1 1 1 1
SAYONARA DR & MAUANA WAY 3 0.14 3 3 1 1 1 2 2
MING WAY & SAYONARA DR 3 0.25 3 3 1 2 3 1
JANET LN & AUBURN BLVD 3 -0.11 8 1 2 1 2 1 1
SYLVAN RD & SYLVAN CREEK CT 3 -0.11 3 3 3 1
SUNRISE BLVD & HIGHLAND AVE 3 -0.12 3 3 1 2 1 1 1
TROVITA WAY & WOODMORE OAKS DR 3 0.56 13 1 2 1 2 1 1
VAN MAREN LN & CAMPFIRE WAY 3 -0.10 8 1 2 1 2 3 1
SYLVAN RD & ALMONDWOOD AVE 3 -0.11 193 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 VAN MAREN LN & WINLOCK AVE 3 -0.09 18 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1
SUNRISE BLVD & MICHIGAN DR 3 -0.11 18 1 1 1 2 1 2 1
PLEASANT VIEW DR & OAK AVE 3 -0.10 8 1 2 1 1 1 1
COBALT WAY & CALVIN DR 3 0.17 3 3 2 1 2
OLD RANCH RD & OAK AVE 3 -0.07 198 1 1 1 2 1 1
SAINT PHILOMENA WAY & SAINT JEANNE WAY 3 0.52 3 3 3
DEANTON CT & ANTELOPE RD 3 -0.11 3 3 2 1 3 1 1
PEPPERCRESS CT & GARDENVINE AVE 3 1.03 18 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 ASHMONT ST & STONEHAND AVE 3 0.52 3 3 2 1 1 1
ZENITH DR & ZENITH DR 3 0.03 13 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
SUMMERPLACE DR & BLACKSTAR DR 3 0.54 22 2 1 1 1 1 2 1
ROSSWOOD DR & GRAND OAKS BLVD 3 0.04 3 3 1 1 1 1 1
CORAL OAK WAY & OLD AUBURN RD 3 -0.08 3 3 1 1 1 2 2
WOODDALE WAY & OLD AUBURN RD 3 -0.08 18 1 1 1 2 1 2 1
SUNRISE BLVD & OLIVIA LN 3 -0.11 3 3 2 1 1
SUNRISE BLVD & ARBORELLE S DWY 3 -0.11 198 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 ORELLE CREEK CT & OLD AUBURN RD 3 -0.09 198 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUNRISE BLVD & EVA RETTA CT 3 -0.11 8 1 2 3 2 2 1
VILLAVIEW DR & OUTLOOK DR 3 0.33 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 1
AUBURN BLVD & CHERRY GLEN AVE 3 -0.11 13 1 2 1 1 1 1

Page 8 of 9 ends

1. Local Critical Crash Rate Differential

2. Equivalent Property Damage Only Crashes

Page 9 of 9 ends

ITEM 11

APPENDIX B

SEGMENT NETWORK SCREENING RESULTS
ITEM 11
Facility Limits Crashes Local CCR Differential1 EPDO
2 Fatal Serious Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain PDO Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Head On Hit Object Overturned Other Pedestrian Bicycle Aggressive Distracted Impaired Dark Wet Motorcycle Arterials
SUNRISE BLVD OLD AUBURN RD - ANTELOPE RD 35 6.12 163 9 8 18 6 6 13 1 3 1 1 4 12 2 3 12 2 3 GREENBACK LN BIRDCAGE ST - SUNRISE BLVD 20 0.46 234 1 3 4 12 7 5 5 1 1 1 2 4 4 1 GREENBACK LN SUNRISE BLVD - SUNRISE VISTA DR 17 0.57 391 1 1 2 5 8 9 2 4 2 2 4 2 1 SAN JUAN AVE SPERRY DR - GREENBACK LN 17 1.19 42 2 1 14 4 4 4 4 1 2 1 4 2 1 AUBURN BLVD GREENBACK LN - CREEKBED LN 16 1.39 36 1 2 13 3 3 4 2 2 1 1 4 1 2 1 ANTELOPE RD BRIMSTONE DR - PURSLANE WAY 14 0.46 69 2 7 5 1 2 10 1 9 3 7 1 SUNRISE BLVD GREENBACK LN - ARCADIA DR 13 0.39 33 1 2 10 1 5 4 2 1 4 1 2 1 SUNRISE BLVD ARCADIA DR/SUN HILL DR - TALL RIVER DR 13 0.29 63 2 6 5 2 3 5 2 1 7 2 1 3 SAN JUAN AVE MADISON AVE - KALAMAZOO DR 12 1.13 230 1 5 1 5 6 3 2 1 3 1 2 1 2 SAN JUAN AVE GREENBACK LN - SYLVAN RD 12 0.75 216 1 2 4 5 7 3 2 1 1 1 AUBURN BLVD CARRIAGE DR - SYLVAN RD 11 0.56 36 1 3 7 4 3 3 1 3 2 1 GREENBACK LN SHUPE DR - SAN JUAN AVE 10 0.09 35 1 3 6 1 3 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 MADISON AVE SAN JUAN AVE - HIGHVIEW LN 9 -0.01 14 1 8 3 2 3 1 4 1 1 SUNRISE BLVD MACY PLAZA DR - SUNRISE MALL 9 0.19 44 2 3 4 1 1 3 3 1 5 2 2 1 ANTELOPE RD ORANGE DR - DEANTON CT 9 0.18 34 2 1 6 1 7 1 1 1 4 5 SUNRISE BLVD OAK AVE - SUNRISE OAKS DWY 8 0.05 28 4 4 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 SUNRISE BLVD ANTELOPE RD - SUNRISE WOODS DWY 8 0.32 198 1 1 3 3 2 3 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 GREENBACK LN MARIPOSA AVE - BURICH AVE 7 -0.01 32 1 3 3 3 4 5 2 GREENBACK LN DESIMONE LN - PARKOAKS DR 7 -0.10 17 1 6 2 1 4 2 1 2 1 SYLVAN RD ALMONDWOOD AVE - OLD AUBURN RD 7 0.27 32 1 3 3 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 AUBURN BLVD LINDEN AVE - N CITY LIMIT 7 0.79 22 3 4 3 1 2 1 2 2 SUNRISE BLVD MADISON AVE - ALTA SUNRISE DR 6 -0.14 26 1 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 GREENBACK LN WILKINS WAY - MARIPOSA AVE 6 -0.12 184 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 GREENBACK LN SUNRISE VISTA DR - SUNRISE VISTA DR 6 0.03 36 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 SUNRISE BLVD LARWIN DR - HIGHLAND AVE 6 -0.11 30 2 1 3 1 1 4 3 2 2 1 ANTELOPE RD MARIPOSA AVE - FORBOROUGH W DWY 5 -0.12 39 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 ANTELOPE RD LICHEN DR - BRIMSTONE DR 5 -0.16 169 1 4 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 FAIR OAKS BLVD GREENBACK LN - WELLES LN 4 -0.05 14 1 3 1 3 2 1 2 1

Page 1 of 2 ends

ITEM 11
Facility Limits Crashes Local CCR Differential1 EPDO
2 Fatal Serious Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain PDO Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Head On Hit Object Overturned Other Pedestrian Bicycle Aggressive Distracted Impaired Dark Wet Motorcycle GREENBACK LN INDIAN RIVER DR - MATHENY WAY 4 -0.26 19 1 1 2 3 1 1 SUNRISE BLVD HIGHLAND AVE - WOODMORE OAKS DR 4 -0.26 9 1 3 1 2 1 2 2 SUNRISE BLVD SUNRISE TERRACE LN - SUNGARDEN DR 4 -0.17 4 4 3 1 1 1 1 AUBURN BLVD OLD AUBURN RD - HACKNEY WAY 4 -0.23 19 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 ANTELOPE RD PURSLANE WAY - GARDEN GATE DR 4 -0.25 23 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 MADISON AVE MARIPOSA AVE - UPLANDS WAY 4 -0.25 28 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 SUNRISE BLVD KINGSWOOD DR - MACY PLAZA DR 3 -0.32 8 1 2 3 3 1 SUNRISE BLVD SUNRISE MALL - GREENBACK LN 3 -0.36 13 2 1 1 2 AUBURN BLVD IMPERIAL WAY - SHADOW LN 3 -0.23 3 3 1 2 1
GREENBACK LN PARKOAKS DR - LONGFORD DR 3 -0.30 8 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 GREENBACK LN BINET DR - BROOKTREE DR 3 -0.34 3 3 3 1 1 2 AUBURN BLVD RAINTREE DR - CARRIAGE DR 3 -0.24 18 1 1 1 2 1 1 OLD AUBURN RD MARIPOSA AVE - BONITA WAY 3 -0.11 8 1 2 3 3 1 1 OLD AUBURN RD SYLVAN RD - LITTLE OL CT 3 -0.22 13 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 ANTELOPE RD SAYBROOK DR - SUMMERPLACE DR 3 -0.32 13 1 2 1 2 1 1 OLD AUBURN RD ARGO DR - OAKWOOD HILLS CIR 3 0.00 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 AUBURN BLVD TWIN OAKS AVE - LINDEN AVE 3 -0.20 22 2 1 1 1 1 Collectors
BIRDCAGE ST BIRDCAGE VILLAGE/HOBBY LOBBY DWY - GREENBACK LN 6 3.24 26 1 2 3 3 1 2 2 1 2 LICHEN DR ANTELOPE RD - BRIMSTONE DR 4 0.78 24 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 SUNRISE VISTA DR SUNRISE E WAY - LEGACY PARK 3 5.15 13 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Local
ROSEVILLE RD BUTTERNUT RD - WHYTE AVE 4 -0.12 23 2 2 1 2 1 2 BRAYTON AVE BROOKTREE PARK - KERMIT LN 4 8.70 14 1 3 2 2 3 2 1 1 TWIN OAKS AVE AUBURN BLVD - HOLLY DR 3 1.35 3 3 1 2 1 1 1

2. Equivalent Property Damage Only Crashes

1. Local Critical Crash Rate Differential

Page 2 of 2 ends

ITEM 11

APPENDIX C

SUMMARY OF PROGRAMS, POLICIES, AND PRACTICES FOR THE

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
ITEM 11
Topic Current Status Recommendation
Complete Streets
Policy
Safe Routes to School
(SRTS) Funding
Traffic Safety
Education
Program for
Reviewing Crash
Activity
Crossroads Database
Updates
Speed Limits
City Enforcement on
Bicycle Rules
Sobriety / Seatbelt
Checks
City Law Enforcement
Coordination with
Adjacent
Jurisdictions
ITEM 11
Topic Current Status Recommendation
Traffic Calming
Policies
Speed Surveys
Transit Vehicles
Accommodation of
Bicycles
Coordination of
Transit Providers and
City Staff
Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master
Plans
General Plan
Addresses
Multimodal Traffic
Safety
Inventory of Bicycle,
Pedestrian, Parking,
and other facilities
Traffic Safety Audit
Program
Coordination
between Local Health
Agencies and City
Transportation
Planning
Coordination
between Emergency
Response and City
Transportation
Planning
ITEM 11
Topic Current Status Recommendation
Resident Feedback
Maintenance of
Roadway Surfaces
Transportation
Demand Management
(TDM)
Policies/Programs
Use of overlays,
specific plans,
redevelopment areas
to encourage infill
development to
reduce VMT
Regular Collection of
Traffic / Bicycle /
Pedestrian Volumes
School Zone Safety
Program for Installing
Wayfinding Signage
Warrants for Traffic
Control Devices
Crosswalk Safety
ITEM 11

APPENDIX D

PROJECT SHEETS
ITEM 11
Citrus Heights Local Roadway Safety Plan (2026)
Location: 42 Signalized intersections (100 Signal Heads, 88 Mast Arms) Agency Name: City of Citrus Heights 771 1 BRIMSTONE DR AND ANTELOPE RD 27 SUNRISE BLVD AND ARCADIA DR Contact Name: Molly Poole - 2 SUNRISE BLVD AND ANTELOPE RD 28 INDIAN RIVER DR AND GREENBACK LN E-mail: [email protected] 6032 3 SAN JUAN AVE AND MADISON AVE 29 SYLVAN RD AND UNNAMED RD 2 4 MARIPOSA AVE AND MADISON AVE 30 HALIFAX ST AND AUBURN BLVD 23 5 PRIMROSE DR AND MADISON AVE 31 VAN MAREN LN AND AUBURN BLVD 125 6 SUNRISE BLVD AND MADISON AVE 32 SUNRISE BLVD AND ARCADE LAKE LN 209 7 FAIR OAKS BLVD AND TREECREST AVE 33 SUNRISE BLVD AND WOODMORE OAKS DR 412 8 FAIR OAKS BLVD AND SUNRISE EAST WAY 34 CARRIAGE DR AND AUBURN BLVD 9 FAIR OAKS BLVD AND GREENBACK LN 35 MARIPOSA AVE AND OLD AUBURN RD 10 MARIPOSA AVE AND ANTELOPE RD 36 FAIR OAKS BLVD AND OAK AVE 11 LAUPPE LN AND ANTELOPE RD 37 ANTELOPE RD AND OLD AUBURN RD 12 ANTELOPE RD AND I 80 EB RAMPS 38 FAIR OAKS BLVD AND OLD AUBURN RD 13 GARDEN GATE DR AND ANTELOPE RD 39 AUBURN BLVD AND GRAND OAKS BLVD 14 SUNRISE BLVD AND TWIN OAKS AVE 40 AUBURN BLVD AND ROLLINGWOOD BLVD 15 SUNRISE BLVD AND ALTA SUNRISE DR 41 AUBURN BLVD AND TWIN OAKS AVE 16 SAN JUAN AVE AND WILLOWCREEK DR 42 SUNRISE BLVD AND SUNRISE MALL DWY 17 SUNRISE BLVD AND KINGSWOOD DR
18 SUNRISE BLVD AND MACY PLAZA DR
19 SUNRISE BLVD AND GREENBACK LN
20 SAN JUAN AVE AND SPERRY DR
21 WILKINS WAY AND GREENBACK LN
22 BIRDCAGE ST AND GREENBACK LN
23 SUNRISE VISTA DR AND GREENBACK LN
24 DEWEY DR AND GREENBACK LN
25 SAN JUAN AVE AND GREENBACK LN
26 MARIPOSA AVE AND GREENBACK LN

NOTES COLLISION
TYPE RECOMMENDATION LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY MANUAL (LRSM) COUNTERMEASURE LRSM # Expected Life (Years) CMF CALTRANS FUNDING

NUMBER OF

HISTORIC

CRASHES

REDUCED
10-YEAR CRASH

REDUCTION

ESTIMATE
CRASH

SEVERITY COST
(2026 $)
10-YEAR CRASH REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2026 $)
10-YEAR CRASH

REDUCTION BENEFIT
(2026 $)

QUANTITY/

NUMBER OF
UNITS

UNIT COST
(2026 $)
COST ESTIMATE (2026 $) BENEFIT/COST
FATAL 2 0.3 0.60 $ 2,162,000 $ 1,297,200
SEVERE 23 3.45 6.90 $ 2,162,000 $ 14,917,800
OTHER VISIBLE 125 18.75 37.50 $ 193,000 $ 7,237,500
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 209 31.35 62.70 $ 110,000 $ 6,897,000 PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 412 61.8 123.60 $ 18,000 $ 2,224,800 Total Cost
Contingency
Contingency + Cost
Benefit

4.7 Systemic Signalized Intersections
Crashes on intersection approaches with mast
arms to be replaced
Applicable Crashes
Local CCR Differential
Project Intersections

0.85 0.9
Equivalent Property Damage Only
Fatal
Severe Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
Property Damage Only

NUMBER OF CRASHES
(2020-2024)
Crashes which occurred on intersection
approaches with proposed traffic
signal/mast arm improvements
Install supplemental signal heads; replace existing traffic signal mast arms Improve signal hardware: lenses,
back-plates with retroreflective
borders, mounting, size, and
number
SI02 10
Benefit Cost Ratio:
$ 32,574,300 Lump Sum $ 5,382,520 $ 5,382,520 6.1
$ 5,382,520
$ 1,614,756
$ 6,997,276
$ 32,574,300
ITEM 11
Citrus Heights Local Roadway Safety Plan (2026)
Location: Systemic: City Arterials and Collectors
Arterial
Segments
Arterial
Unsignalized
Intxs
Arterial
Signalized
Intxs
Collector
Segments
Collector Unsignalized
Intxs
Collector Signalized
Intxs
All crashes at
stop control
intx crashes
Agency Name: City of Citrus Heights 408 867 1537 36 361 2 116 Contact Name: Molly Poole - - - - - - -
E-mail: [email protected] 4211 11109 10913 541 2627 2 1331 2 5 2 0 4 0 0
12 42 40 2 5 0 5
69 157 239 6 53 0 23
92 193 401 13 53 0 8
233 470 855 15 246 2 80
75 190 322 6 72 0
88 120 260 7 66 1
118 225 590 9 76 1
10 36 63 5 27 0
75 219 160 6 83 0
9 9 37 0 13 0
15 30 48 3 10 0
18 38 57 0 14 0
128 246 822 12 100 1
11 27 44 2 13 1
52 122 134 4 52 1
9 44 62 1 14 1
30 79 128 4 23 0

NOTES COLLISION
TYPE

RECOMMENDATION LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY MANUAL
(LRSM) COUNTERMEASURE LRSM # Expected
Life (Years) CMF CALTRANS

FUNDING

NUMBER OF

HISTORIC

CRASHES

REDUCED
10-YEAR CRASH

REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2026 $)
CRASH

SEVERITY COST
(2026 $)
10-YEAR CRASH

REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2025 $)
10-YEAR CRASH

REDUCTION BENEFIT
(2026 $)

QUANTITY/ NUMBER

OF UNITS

UNIT COST
(2026 $)

COST ESTIMATE
(2026 $)

BENEFIT/COST
FATAL 0 0 0.00 $ 2,978,000 $ -
SEVERE 5 0.75 1.50 $ 2,978,000 $ 4,467,000
OTHER VISIBLE 23 3.45 6.90 $ 193,000 $ 1,331,700
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 8 1.2 2.40 $ 110,000 $ 264,000
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 80 12 24.00 $ 18,000 $ 432,000
FATAL 2 0.3 0.60 $ 3,440,000 $ 2,064,000
SEVERE 12 1.8 3.60 $ 3,440,000 $ 12,384,000
OTHER VISIBLE 69 10.35 20.70 $ 193,000 $ 3,995,100
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 92 13.8 27.60 $ 110,000 $ 3,036,000
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 233 34.95 69.90 $ 18,000 $ 1,258,200 FATAL 5 0.75 1.50 $ 2,978,000 $ 4,467,000
SEVERE 42 6.3 12.60 $ 2,978,000 $ 37,522,800
OTHER VISIBLE 157 23.55 47.10 $ 193,000 $ 9,090,300
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 193 28.95 57.90 $ 110,000 $ 6,369,000 PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 470 70.5 141.00 $ 18,000 $ 2,538,000 FATAL - - - $ 2,162,000 -
SEVERE - - - $ 2,162,000 -
OTHER VISIBLE - - - $ 193,000 -
COMPLAINT OF PAIN - - - $ 110,000 -
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY - - - $ 18,000 -
Combined Arterial BCR 41.2
Stop Controlled
Intersections (225) All crashes Replace existing stop signs at local road intersections with larger or retroreflective with reflective strips on the posts Install/upgrade larger or additional
stop signs or other intersection
warning/regulatory signs
NS08 10 0.85 0.9 $ 6,494,700
Systemic Roadway Signage Improvements
Crashes
Local CCR Differential
Equivalent Property Damage Only
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Other
Fatal
Severe Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
Property Damage Only
Crash Type
Impaired
Crash Conditions
R22 10
Dark
Wet

NUMBER OF CRASHES
(2020-2024)
Non-Motorist Crashes
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Contributing Factors
Aggressive
Distracted
500 Signs
1689 Signs $ 500 $ 844,500 71.0

64.0 Arterial Unsignalized
Intersections All Replace existing regulatory and warning signs at unsignalized arterial intersections with larger or retroreflective
Install/upgrade larger or additional
stop signs or other intersection
warning/regulatory signs
NS08 10 0.85 0.9 $ 59,987,100
Arterial Segments All 0.85 0.9 $ 22,737,300 711 Signs $ 500 $ 355,500 Replace existing regulatory and warning signs along arterial roadway segments with larger or retroreflective
Install/Upgrade signs with new
fluorescent sheeting (regulatory or
warning)
- - $ - 1613 Signs $ 500 $ 806,500 -
$ 1,000 $ 500,000 13.0
Arterial Signalized
Intersections All Replace existing regulatory and warning signs at signalized arterial intersections with retroreflective - - - ITEM 11
Citrus Heights Local Roadway Safety Plan (2026)
Location: Systemic: City Arterials and Collectors
Arterial
Segments
Arterial
Unsignalized
Intxs
Arterial
Signalized
Intxs
Collector
Segments
Collector Unsignalized
Intxs
Collector Signalized
Intxs
All crashes at
stop control
intx crashes
Agency Name: City of Citrus Heights 408 867 1537 36 361 2 116 Contact Name: Molly Poole - - - - - - -
E-mail: [email protected] 4211 11109 10913 541 2627 2 1331 2 5 2 0 4 0 0
12 42 40 2 5 0 5
69 157 239 6 53 0 23
92 193 401 13 53 0 8
233 470 855 15 246 2 80
75 190 322 6 72 0
88 120 260 7 66 1
118 225 590 9 76 1
10 36 63 5 27 0
75 219 160 6 83 0
9 9 37 0 13 0
15 30 48 3 10 0
18 38 57 0 14 0
128 246 822 12 100 1
11 27 44 2 13 1
52 122 134 4 52 1
9 44 62 1 14 1
30 79 128 4 23 0

NOTES COLLISION
TYPE

RECOMMENDATION LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY MANUAL
(LRSM) COUNTERMEASURE LRSM # Expected
Life (Years) CMF CALTRANS

FUNDING

NUMBER OF

HISTORIC

CRASHES

REDUCED
10-YEAR CRASH

REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2026 $)
CRASH

SEVERITY COST
(2026 $)
10-YEAR CRASH

REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2025 $)
10-YEAR CRASH

REDUCTION BENEFIT
(2026 $)

QUANTITY/ NUMBER

OF UNITS

UNIT COST
(2026 $)

COST ESTIMATE
(2026 $)

BENEFIT/COST
Systemic Roadway Signage Improvements
Crashes
Local CCR Differential
Equivalent Property Damage Only
Broadside
Sideswipe
Rear End
Head On
Hit Object
Other
Fatal
Severe Injury
Other Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
Property Damage Only
Crash Type
Impaired
Crash Conditions
Dark
Wet

NUMBER OF CRASHES
(2020-2024)
Non-Motorist Crashes
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Contributing Factors
Aggressive
Distracted
FATAL 0 0 0.00 $ 3,440,000 $ -
SEVERE 2 0.3 0.60 $ 3,440,000 $ 2,064,000
OTHER VISIBLE 6 0.9 1.80 $ 193,000 $ 347,400
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 13 1.95 3.90 $ 110,000 $ 429,000
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 15 2.25 4.50 $ 18,000 $ 81,000
FATAL 4 0.6 1.20 $ 2,978,000 $ 3,573,600
SEVERE 5 0.75 1.50 $ 2,978,000 $ 4,467,000
OTHER VISIBLE 53 7.95 15.90 $ 193,000 $ 3,068,700
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 53 7.95 15.90 $ 110,000 $ 1,749,000
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 246 36.9 73.80 $ 18,000 $ 1,328,400 FATAL - - - $ 2,162,000 -
SEVERE - - - $ 2,162,000 -
OTHER VISIBLE - - - $ 193,000 -
COMPLAINT OF PAIN - - - $ 110,000 -
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY - - - $ 18,000 -
Combined Collector BCR 15.7
Total Cost
Contingency
Contingency +
Cost
Benefit

20.5 22.9
Collector Unsignalized
Intersections All Replace existing regulatory and warning signs at unsignalized collector intersections with larger or retroreflective Install/upgrade larger or additional
stop signs or other intersection
warning/regulatory signs
NS08
Collector Signalized
Intersections All Replace existing regulatory and warning signs at signalized collector intersections with retroreflective - - - - Collector Segments All Replace existing regulatory and warning signs along collector roadway segments with larger or retroreflective
Install/Upgrade signs with new
fluorescent sheeting (regulatory or
warning)
R22 10
10 $ 127,500
- $ - 27 Signs $ 500 $ 13,500 -

0.85 0.9 $ 2,921,400
$ 5,176,100
$ 106,327,200
Benefit Cost Ratio:

14.9 $ 3,597,000
$ 1,079,100

0.85 0.9 $ 14,186,700 1899 Signs $ 500 $ 949,500
255 Signs $ 500
ITEM 11
Citrus Heights Local Roadway Safety Plan (2026)
Location: Old Auburn Rd between Auburn Boulevard/Sylvan Rd and Gary Oaks Dr Sylvan Rd/
Auburn
Blvd
Mariposa Ave Sunrise Blvd Antelope Rd Fair Oaks Blvd
Agency Name: City of Citrus Heights 12 1 9 0 0
Contact Name: Molly Poole - - - - -
E-mail: [email protected] 37 1 153 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
1 0 2 0 0
3 0 1 0 0
8 1 5 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
4 0 2 0 0
4 1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
2 0 3 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
2 0 2 0 0
3 1 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0 0

NOTES COLLISION TYPE RECOMMENDATION LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY MANUAL (LRSM) COUNTERMEASURE LRSM # Expected
Life (Years) CMF CALTRANS FUNDING

NUMBER OF

HISTORIC

CRASHES

REDUCED
10-YEAR CRASH

REDUCTION

ESTIMATE
CRASH

SEVERITY COST
(2026 $)
10-YEAR CRASH

REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2026 $)
10-YEAR CRASH

REDUCTION BENEFIT
(2026 $)

QUANTITY/ NUMBER

OF UNITS

UNIT COST
(2026 $)

COST ESTIMATE
(2026 $)

BENEFIT/COST
FATAL 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
SEVERE 1 0.15 0.30 $ 2,162,000 $ 648,600
OTHER VISIBLE 8 1.2 2.40 $ 193,000 $ 463,200
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 11 1.65 3.30 $ 110,000 $ 363,000
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 29 4.35 8.70 $ 18,000 $ 156,600
FATAL 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
SEVERE 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
OTHER VISIBLE 1 0.15 0.30 $ 193,000 $ 57,900
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 3 0.45 0.90 $ 110,000 $ 99,000
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 8 1.2 2.40 $ 18,000 $ 43,200
FATAL 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
SEVERE 1 0.15 0.30 $ 2,162,000 $ 648,600
OTHER VISIBLE 2 0.3 0.60 $ 193,000 $ 115,800
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 1 0.15 0.30 $ 110,000 $ 33,000
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 5 0.75 1.50 $ 18,000 $ 27,000
FATAL 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
SEVERE 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
OTHER VISIBLE 0 0 0.00 $ 193,000 $ -
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 0 0 0.00 $ 110,000 $ -
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 1 0.15 0.30 $ 18,000 $ 5,400
FATAL 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
SEVERE 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
OTHER VISIBLE 2 0.5 1.00 $ 193,000 $ 193,000
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 2 0.5 1.00 $ 110,000 $ 110,000
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 7 1.75 3.50 $ 18,000 $ 63,000
FATAL 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
SEVERE 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
OTHER VISIBLE 0 0 0.00 $ 193,000 $ -
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 5 1.25 2.50 $ 110,000 $ 275,000
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 2 0.5 1.00 $ 18,000 $ 18,000

46.6 $ 72,000 $ 72,000 2.8

0.0 $ 270,000 $ 270,000 3.1
$ 26,250 $ 26,250 11.2
$ 20,000 $ 20,000
Improve signal hardware: lenses,
back-plates with retroreflective
borders, mounting, size, and number
SI02
$ 35,000 $ 35,000
$ 824,400 1 Lump Sum
$ 200,100 1 Lump Sum
10 Head On

0.85 0.9
Aggressive
Impaired
Bicycle

0.85 0.9
$ 293,000 1 Intersection Corner
1 Intersection Corner
Corridor Improvements

NUMBER OF CRASHES
(2020-2024)
improve signal timing (coordination,
phases, red, yellow, or operation) SI03 10 0.85 0.5 $ 1,631,400 1 Lump Sum Old Auburn Rd at:

Local CCR Differential
Equivalent Property Damage Only
Fatal
Other Visible Injury
Property Damage Only
Broadside
Rear End
Hit Object
Contributing Factors
Crash Conditions
Complaint of Pain
Sideswipe
Other
Fair Oaks Blvd Install raised median along Antelope Rd west of the intersection Signalize channelized right turn movement (no calculated benefit) Improve signal hardware: lenses,
back-plates with retroreflective
borders, mounting, size, and number
SI02 10 0.75 0.9
Auburn Blvd/ Sylvan Rd
Sunrise Blvd
Mariposa Ave Signalize the channelized right turn movements 10 Crashes related
to the RT Slip
Lane
No crashes
identified related
to the slip lane.

Crashes occurred
within influence
area of proposed
median
SI02 applied to
mast arm
improvements
for separate
project
Improve signal hardware: lenses,
back-plates with retroreflective
borders, mounting, size, and number
SI02 10 0.85 0.9
Signalize the channelized right turn movements
Enhanced Pavement Markings
Square up the SE Corner
Signalize the channelized right turn movements
Striping/Civil improvements associated with Old Auburn Rd road diet Improve signal hardware: lenses,
back-plates with retroreflective
borders, mounting, size, and number
SI02
Antelope Rd Install raised median along Antelope Rd
Signalize channelized right turn movement (no calculated benefit) Improve signal hardware: lenses,
back-plates with retroreflective
borders, mounting, size, and number
SI11
SI02 10 0.75 0.9 $ 366,000 1 Lump Sum $ 30,000 $ 30,000 12.2 Applicable Crashes
Crash Type
Dark
Severe Injury
Non-Motorist Crashes
-
Crashes along
Old Auburn Blvd
Coordinate the traffic signals along Old Auburn Rd between Sylvan Auburn Blvd and Fair Oaks Blvd (5 intersections)
Distracted
Wet
Pedestrian
ITEM 11
Citrus Heights Local Roadway Safety Plan (2026)
Location: Old Auburn Rd between Auburn Boulevard/Sylvan Rd and Gary Oaks Dr Sylvan Rd/
Auburn
Blvd
Mariposa Ave Sunrise Blvd Antelope Rd Fair Oaks Blvd
Agency Name: City of Citrus Heights 12 1 9 0 0
Contact Name: Molly Poole - - - - -
E-mail: [email protected] 37 1 153 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
1 0 2 0 0
3 0 1 0 0
8 1 5 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
4 0 2 0 0
4 1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
2 0 3 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
2 0 2 0 0
3 1 4 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0 0

NOTES COLLISION TYPE RECOMMENDATION LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY MANUAL (LRSM) COUNTERMEASURE LRSM # Expected
Life (Years) CMF CALTRANS FUNDING

NUMBER OF

HISTORIC

CRASHES

REDUCED
10-YEAR CRASH

REDUCTION

ESTIMATE
CRASH

SEVERITY COST
(2026 $)
10-YEAR CRASH

REDUCTION

BENEFIT
(2026 $)
10-YEAR CRASH

REDUCTION BENEFIT
(2026 $)

QUANTITY/ NUMBER

OF UNITS

UNIT COST
(2026 $)

COST ESTIMATE
(2026 $)

BENEFIT/COST
Head On
Aggressive
Impaired
Bicycle
Corridor Improvements

NUMBER OF CRASHES
(2020-2024)
Old Auburn Rd at:

Local CCR Differential
Equivalent Property Damage Only
Fatal
Other Visible Injury
Property Damage Only
Broadside
Rear End
Hit Object
Contributing Factors
Crash Conditions
Complaint of Pain
Sideswipe
Other
Applicable Crashes
Crash Type
Dark
Severe Injury
Non-Motorist Crashes
Distracted
Wet
Pedestrian
FATAL 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
SEVERE 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
OTHER VISIBLE 5 1.25 2.50 $ 193,000 $ 482,500
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 5 1.25 2.50 $ 110,000 $ 275,000
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 9 2.25 4.50 $ 18,000 $ 81,000
FATAL 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
SEVERE 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
OTHER VISIBLE 5 2.25 4.50 $ 193,000 $ 868,500
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 5 2.25 4.50 $ 110,000 $ 495,000
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 9 4.05 8.10 $ 18,000 $ 145,800
FATAL 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
SEVERE 0 0 0.00 $ 2,162,000 $ -
OTHER VISIBLE 0 0 0.00 $ 193,000 $ -
COMPLAINT OF PAIN 0 0 0.00 $ 110,000 $ -
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 0 0 0.00 $ 18,000 $ -
Total Cost
Contingency
Contingency +
Cost
Benefit

3.8 1 Lump Sum $ 47,000 $ 47,000 0.0 Old Auburn Rd and Tiara Way
Pedestrian and
Bicycle Crashes Install RRFB, Pedestrian Median Island, and Hi-Visibility Crosswalk Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) NS24PB 20 0.65 0.9 $ - 19750 LF $ 2 $ 39,500 38.2
Between Antelope Road
and Fair Oaks Blvd All Vertical Curve correction between Antelope Road and Fair Oaks Blvd Flatten crest vertical curve R18 20 0.75 0.9 $ 838,500 1 Lump Sum Between Sylvan Rd and
Gary Oaks Blvd Bicycle Crashes Install Buffered Bike Lane Install Separated Bike Lanes R34PB 20 0.55 0.9 $ 1,509,300 $ 1,139,750
$ 341,925
$ 1,481,675
$ 5,662,700
Benefit Cost Ratio:
$ 600,000 $ 600,000 1.4
ITEM 11

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 8, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Regina Cave, Director, General Services Department SUBJECT: Sale of Real Property located at 7859 Casa Bella Way Summary and Recommendation
The City is the owner of real property located at 7859 Casa Bella Way, commonly known as Sacramento County Assessor’s Parcel Number 211-0670-068-0000, in the City of Citrus Heights, California (the “Property”). In January 2026, the Property was declared as exempt surplus property. Staff desire to proceed with the disposal of the Property.

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-___ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing the Sale of Real Property at 7859 Casa Bella Way, Designating the City Manager as the Authorized Signatory for Any and All Documents Related to this Sale
Strategic Plan Alignment
This item is in alignment with the following City Council priority:

Goal: Maintain and Enhance Fiscal Stability While Supporting Operational Excellence Fiscal Impact
The total sale of the Property is $486,000. The city is responsible for all standard applicable closing costs including seller and buyer agent fees. All proceeds to the City, approximately $445,000, will go to the City’s General Fund.

Background and Analysis
In 2007, the City awarded a grant in the amount of $350,000 to A Community for Peac (ACFP), formerly the Domestic Violence Intervention Center, to acquire a property for the purpose of operating the Citrus Heights Women’s Center (Safe House), to provide services for women and children escaping domestic violence. The Property was acquired utilizing the grant funds, with ITEM 12
Subject: Sale of Real Property located at 7859 Casa Bella Way Date: July 08, 2026

Page 2 of 2 ends

the City holding the deed of trust as security. In 2022, ACFP notified the City that they could no longer operate the Safe House due to financial challenges. In March 2025, the Property was transferred to the City as part of the dissolution of ACFP.

In accordance with the Surplus Land Act (Govt. Code §54220 et seq.), in December 2025, city staff presented a proposal to the Planning Commission to declare the Property as exempt surplus property for the intent of disposing of the Property from the city’s assets. The city’s Planning Commission voted unanimously in support of staff’s recommendation declaring the Property as exempt surplus land and that disposal of said land was consistent with the city’s General Plan. In January 2026, staff presented a Declaration of Exempt Surplus Property for 7859 Casa Bella Way to the City Council. The item was approved by City Council.

In January 2026, the City issued a Request for Qualifications for Real Estate Broker Services to assist with the process of selling the Property. In June 2026, the Property was placed on the market, and multiple offers were received above the listed sale price. Staff desire to proceed with escrow to finalize the transfer of the Property. This requested action seeks to codify approval of the sale and designate the City Manager as the authorized signatory for all documents related to the sale of the Property, including but not limited to the offer acceptance, disclosures, grant deed, closing cost statements and transfer tax documents.

Attachments
1) Resolution No. 2026-___ - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Authorizing the Sale of Real Property at 7859 Casa Bella Way, Designating the City Manager as the Authorized Signatory for Any and All Documents Related to this Sale
ITEM 12
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
SALE OF REAL PROPERTY AT 7859 CASA BELLA WAY, DESIGNATING

THE CITY MANAGER AS THE AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY

FOR ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THIS SALE

WHEREAS, the City of Citrus Heights is the owner of real property (“Property”) located at 7859 Casa Bella Way; and
WHEREAS, in January 2026, the Property was declared as surplus property; and WHEREAS, the Property was placed on the open market, garnering multiple offers above the listed sale price; and
WHEREAS, staff wish to proceed with finalizing the sale of the Property; and WHEREAS, all proceeds from the sale will be deposited to the City’s General Fund.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights does hereby authorize the sale of real property located at 7859 Casa Bella Way, and further designates the City Manager as the authorized signatory for any and all documents related to this sale.

The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 8th day of July 2026 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

MariJane Lopez-Taff, Mayor
ATTEST:

Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 12

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 8, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Alexander A. Turcotte, Chief of Police
Kristopher Frey, Police Commander
Cassandra Kinnan, Senior Management Analyst

SUBJECT: 2025 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Funding

Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution accepting the recommended expenditures for the 2025 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) in the amount of $24,276, in accordance with state requirements. The FY 2025 funds must be expended by September 30, 2026.

Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-___ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Accepting 2025 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) in Accordance with State Requirements.

Strategic Plan Alignment
This staff report is in alignment with the following City Council priority:

Goal: Preserve and enhance public safety
Fiscal Impact
The 2025 JAG grant will be utilized to purchase ballistic shields and vests. There are no matching requirements for the grant money to be expended. Equipment purchases will be made in accordance with the City’s adopted purchasing policies and procedures.

Background and Analysis
Each year, the Bureau of Justice Assistance partners with the Bureau of Justice Statistics to allocate funding for each state and territory. The state distribution is based on violent crime and ITEM 13
Subject: 2025 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Funding Date: July 8, 2026

Page 2 of 2 ends

population size. The state’s award amount is divided between the state and local governments at a rate of 60 and 40 percent, respectively.

Under this program, cities and counties receive federal funds to augment public safety expenditures. This is a non-competitive grant program. There is no guarantee for funding or minimum allocations.

The funds must be used for law enforcement activities to include: technical assistance, strategic planning, research and evaluation, data collection, training, personnel, equipment, forensic laboratories, supplies, contractual support, and criminal justice information systems. During the application phase, the local government is asked to identify which of the above activities the funding will be used for. The Police Department applied for grant funding based on the need to replace outdated ballistic shields and vests.

The Police Department is requesting to strategically use grant funds to support the Department’s equipment and training initiatives. This request will support our goal to provide exceptional police services to the community and enhance officer safety.

Attachments

1. Resolution No. 2026-___ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Accepting 2025 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) in Accordance with State Requirements.

ITEM 13
Printed on Recycled Paper
RESOLUTION NO. 2026- ___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING 2025 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE

GRANT (JAG) FUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE REQUIREMENTS WHEREAS, under the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the federal government appropriated significant funding for local law enforcement services for FY 2025; and WHEREAS, Citrus Heights’ portion of this funding is $24,276; and WHEREAS, under the conditions of the program, the City Council shall appropriate monies exclusively to fund police equipment, supplies, training, and technology in accordance with this written request submitted by the Chief of Police; and
WHEREAS, the Chief of Police requests to purchase ballistic shields and vests.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, hereby authorizes the Chief of Police to use the 2025 JAG grant funding to purchase ballisitic shields and vests.

The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 8th day of July 2026 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

MariJane Lopez-Taff, Mayor
ATTEST:

Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 13

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 8, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Regina Cave, General Services Director
Leslie Blomquist, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 97-01 (Zones 1, 2, 3 & 4) Levy of Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Assessments
Recommendation
On June 24, 2026, City Council took the first steps toward the proposed annual update for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 for the Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts (LMAD) 97-01 (Zones 1, 2, 3, and 4). At that time, Council adopted Resolutions of Intention to update the districts and called for a public hearing on July 8, 2026. Subsequently, the City Clerk published the required notice.

The City Council’s intent at that meeting was to maintain the assessments for Zones 1, 3 & 4 at the same level as the prior year and to increase the assessments for Zone 2 by 3% over Fiscal Year 2025/2026.

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Convene the public hearing for the district regarding the proposed annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-____: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, to confirm the diagram and assessment and to levy Fiscal Year 2026/2027 assessments for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 97-01 (Zones 1, 2, 3 & 4).

Strategic Plan Alignment
This item is in alignment with the following City Council priority:

Goal: “Maintain Public Infrastructure and Enhance All Modes of Transportation.” Fiscal Impact
Assessment District 97-01, Zones 1 (Table No.1) and 2 (Table No. 2) are currently fully funded by their annual assessments as well as use of fund reserves as necessary; therefore, there is no fiscal impact to the General Fund for these zones.

ITEM 14
Subject: Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 97-01 (Zones 1, 2 ,3 & 4) Levy of FY 2026/2027 Assessments Date: July 8, 2026

Page 2 of 7 ends

Table No. 1
97-01, Zone 1 (Bridgemont)
Description FY 25/26 Actual* FY 26/27 Proposed
REVENUE:

Special Assessments Revenues $10,450.00 $10,523.00
Interest on Fund Balance (1) $1,074.53 $0.00
Total Estimated Revenues $11,524.53 $10,523.00
EXPENDITURES:

Total Estimated Expenditures $11,350.35 $10382.00 $
Annual Operating Balance $174.18 $141.20
(1) Interest earnings estimated; will reflect actuals in final report. (2) Balance transferred to Assessment Fund reserve.
(3) Assessment Fund reserves available to balance the annual operating shortfall.

Table No. 2
97-01, Zone 2 (Heather Downs)
Description FY 25/26 Actual* FY 26/27 Proposed
REVENUE:

Special Assessments Revenues $13,338.92 $13,833.40
Interest on Fund Balance (1) $879.57 $0.00
Total Estimated Revenues $14,218.49 $13,833.00
EXPENDITURES:

Total Expenditures $15,658.15 $11,100.00
Annual Operating Balance (2) -$1,439.66 $2,733.40
(1) Interest earnings estimated; will reflect actuals in final report. (2) Assessment Fund reserves available to balance the annual operating shortfall.

Historically, Zone 3 has had adequate funding to cover the annual expenditures. However, beginning in FY 19/20, Zone 3 began operating under a shortfall with insufficient revenues to offset these costs.

For FY 25/26, Zone 3 has a projected shortfall of $9,874.64. Staff’s recommendation is to utilize Gas Tax revenues (Fund 205) to cover this shortfall. For FY 26/27, the fund shortfall is expected to be approximately $4,749.60, pending the city’s cost allocation update. As costs for maintaining landscape and appurtenance continue to increase, it will be necessary to seek additional revenue through assessment increases. These efforts are expected to be initiated following completion of the city’s cost allocation update in FY 26/27.

ITEM 14
Subject: Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 97-01 (Zones 1, 2 ,3 & 4) Levy of FY 2026/2027 Assessments Date: July 8, 2026

Page 3 of 7 ends

Table No. 3
97-01, Zone 3 (Verner Glen)
Description FY 25/26 Actual* FY 26/27 Proposed
REVENUE:

Special Assessments Revenues $6,459.20 $6,550.40
Interest on Fund Balance $0.00 $0.00
Total Estimated Revenues $6,549.20 $6,550.40
EXPENDITURES:

Total Estimated Expenditures $16,333.84 $11,300.00
Annual Operating Shortfall (1) -$9,874.64 -$4,749.60
(1) Gas Tax (Fund 205) revenue recommended to balance the annual operating shortfall.

The funding for Zone 4 does not adequately cover the maintenance costs. Historically, this Zone has had a shortfall and the city has implemented cost saving measures to try and reduce the shortfall to the greatest extent possible. However, aging irrigation systems, and increases in utility costs as well as maintenance costs continue to affect the districts operating budget. In past years, contributions from the City’s Gas Tax and General Fund revenues were used to balance Zone 4. For FY 25/26, Zone 4 has a projected shortfall of $19,637.03. Staff’s recommendation is to utilize Gas Tax revenues (Fund 205) to cover this shortfall. For FY 26/27, the fund shortfall is expected to be $14,732.50.

Efforts to seek additional revenues through assessments for this district are expected to be initiated following completion of the city’s cost allocation update in FY 26/27.

Table No. 4
97-01, Zone 4 (Creekridge)
Description FY 25/26 Actual* FY 26/27 Proposed
REVENUE:

Special Assessments Revenues $4,645.86 $4,717.50
Interest on Fund Balance $0.00 $0.00
Total Estimated Revenues $4,645.86 $4,717.50
EXPENDITURES:

Total Estimated Expenditures $24,282.89 $19,450.00
Annual Operating Shortfall (1) -$19,637.03 -$14,732.50
(1) Gas Tax (Fund 205) revenue recommended to balance the annual operating shortfall.

Since the City first took over the LMAD 97-01 from Sacramento County in 1997, the revenues have not been adequate to cover the costs in each of the zones. Over the years, many efforts have been made to reduce costs and in some cases the City has been required to increase assessment. However, ITEM 14
Subject: Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 97-01 (Zones 1, 2 ,3 & 4) Levy of FY 2026/2027 Assessments Date: July 8, 2026

Page 4 of 7 ends

continually increasing utility rates and monthly maintenance costs as well as updated methods for allocation of the City’s overhead costs have all contributed to the increasing shortfall in Zones 3 and

4. The underlying problem is that the assessment rates (outlined in Fiscal Impact, above) have remained largely unchanged since 1996 when Proposition 218, which requires a vote of those assessed to approve an increase, was passed by the California voters.

In 2000, the property owners in Zone 2 approved an immediate assessment increase and the addition of a cost-of-living increase provision to the zone. Annual expenditures in this zone have since exceeded the additional annual revenues and the cost-of-living provision will need to be implemented to ensure sufficient funding in the future.

In 2005, the property owners in Zone 3 approved a one-time assessment increase, but annual expenditures in this zone have now exceeded the additional annual revenues.

Background and Analysis
The City currently has four landscape maintenance districts and several zones within most of the districts.

Assessment
District
Zone Creation
Date
Location
97-01 1 1997 “Bridgemont” subdivision off of Van Maren Lane 2 1997 “Heather Downs” subdivision off of Old Auburn Road 3 1997 “Verner Glen” (Summerhill) subdivision off of Verner Avenue 4 1997 “Villa Creekridge” subdivision off of Oak Avenue 98-01 1 1998 “Stock Village Unit No. 1 & 2” Subdivision off of Stock Ranch Road 98-02 1 1998 “Sorenson Ranch” subdivision off of Van Maren Lane 2 2014 “Autumnwood” subdivision off of Antelope Road
3 2018 “Mariposa Creek” subdivision off Antelope Road
4 2019 “Wyatt Ranch” subdivision off Sunrise Boulevard
03-01 1 2003 “Stock Ranch” development on Auburn Blvd - properties north of Arcade Creek
2 2003 “Stock Ranch” development off of Stock Ranch Road – properties south of Arcade Creek
3 2020 “Mitchell Farms” subdivision between Sunrise Boulevard and Fair Oaks Boulevard, north of Arcadia Drive.

This agenda item addresses LMAD 97-01; LMAD’s 98-01, 98-02 and 03-01 are addressed under a separate agenda item. The annual update and the levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 for the LMAD 97-01 (Zones 1, 2, 3, and 4), proposed by the resolution will fund the following:
maintenance and servicing of landscaping, trees, and other vegetation, and related or appurtenant facilities, including weeding, fertilizing, pruning, and controlling fungus, disease and insect infestation; operation of irrigation and drainage systems, including the provision of water and power, and maintenance of sound walls. Specific maintenance responsibilities for each zone in the district are discussed in the Engineer’s Report. The revenues, including reserves, for Zone 1 are presently adequate to cover its annual expenses and the Engineer’s Report proposes the assessment rate for this zone remain at the rate levied in Fiscal Year 2025/2026 as this zone does not allow for annual increases.

ITEM 14
Subject: Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 97-01 (Zones 1, 2 ,3 & 4) Levy of FY 2026/2027 Assessments Date: July 8, 2026

Page 5 of 7 ends

Maintenance expenditures for Zone 2 exceeded annual assessment revenues in FY 25/26, however there are adequate available reserves to offset its current operating costs. As expenditures for this zone continue to increase, and as permitted by this zone, the Engineer’s Report proposes a 3% cost of living increase in the annual assessment to be levied on each parcel in Zone 2 in Fiscal Year 2026/2027 to maintain current levels of service and sustain the operating reserves.

Since the City took over 97-01 from the County of Sacramento, Zones 3 and 4 have been largely underfunded and as a result, the City has used various funds, including Gas Tax and General Fund revenues, to cover the operating shortfall. To eliminate the funding gap in Zone 3, an assessment increase was approved by the owners of the assessed properties in 2005. The amount increased from $42.50 per parcel to $81.88 per parcel. This assessment increase provided sufficient funds to cover the costs for maintenance and utilities leaving an account balance of a few hundred dollars each year to build reserves until FY 2015/2016. Since FY 2015/2016, irrigation repairs, tree maintenance, the continuing increase in utility rates, and updated methods for allocating the City’s overhead costs have contributed to the depletion of existing reserves and, ultimately a budget shortfall. Historically, subsidy to Zone 3 has been provided primarily from Gas Tax funds. The table below outlines estimated annual revenues and expenditures for Zone 3 dating back to Fiscal Year 2005/2006 when Verner Glen, and Creekridge were separated into two separate zones:

Fiscal Year Revenues Expenditures
Maintenance Capital Project
2005/2006* $28,279.00 $18,218.00 $13,974.00
2006/2007* $20,524.80 $9,008.00 $13,974.00
2007/2008* $20,979.89 $6,619.94 $13,974.00
2008/2009* $22,329.37 $7,194.67 $13,974.00
2009/2010* $20,547.52 $6,781.12 $13,974.00
2010/2011* $20,524.80 $6,391.84 $13,974.00
2011/2012* $20,820.00 $6,412.00 $13,974.00
2012/2013* $20,469.00 $6,919.00 $13,974.00
2013/2014* $20,562.00 $6,023.00 $13,974.00
2014/2015* $20,397.00 $5,808.00 $13,974.00
2015/2016* $6,776.00 $5,778.00 $ -
2016/2017* $6,587.00 $10,253.00 $ -
2017/2018* $6,558.00 $8,802.00 $ -
2018/2019* $6,569.00 $10,228.00 $ -
2019/2020* $6,509.00 $15,936.00 $ -
2020/2021* $6,591.34 $15,025.00 $ -
2021/2022* $6,353.78 $14,546.37 $ -
2022/2023* $6,550.32 $14,905.00 $ -
2023/2024* $6,520.74 $24,093.00 $ -
2024/2025* $6,348.38 $18,349.00 $ -
2025/2026** $6,549.20 $16,333.84 $ -
Total Estimated Subsidy to Zone 3*** $86,898.78
*Increased assessments and expenditures attributed to approved sound wall construction project. ** Estimated Revenues and Expenditures based on actuals to date. ***Maintenance only; does not account for city’s contribution towards sound wall.

ITEM 14
Subject: Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 97-01 (Zones 1, 2 ,3 & 4) Levy of FY 2026/2027 Assessments Date: July 8, 2026

Page 6 of 7 ends

To balance the Zone 4 budget, the City proposed to increase the annual assessment three times. In 1998/1999 shortly after incorporation and when zones 3 and 4 were one single zone. The City attempted twice more after the zones were separated, in 2005 and again in 2009, however, the owners of properties within Zone 4 voted against a proposed increase in the annual assessment. In 2010, in an effort to reduce future subsidies, the City incorporated a xeriscaping (low-water and maintenance) plan to eliminate some of the more labor intensive and water consuming landscape features, such as turf, and reduced the level of service on the remaining landscaping to a minimum. There had been significant reductions in maintenance and utility costs, but the expenditures still exceeded the existing revenues for this zone. This shortfall was subsidized by the City’s General Fund. In an effort to further minimize costs, the City reduced the frequency of maintenance as a pilot project (i.e., every 6 or 8 weeks instead of monthly). However, after numerous complaints from the public about its poor appearance, a higher level of maintenance was reinstated during the FY 2011/2012 year, and Zone 4 continues to see a projected shortfall for FY 2026/2027. Historically, subsidy to Zone 4 has been provided primarily from Gas Tax funds. The table below outlines estimated annual revenues and expenditures for Zone 4, dating back to Fiscal Year 2005/2006 when Zone 4 was split into two separate zones (Verner Glen, and Creekridge):

Fiscal Year Revenues Maintenance Total Subsidy
2005/2006* $4,719.00 $11,173.00 $(6,454.00)
2006/2007* $4,672.00 $11,574.00 $(6,902.00)
2007/2008* $4,752.00 $14,101.00 $(9,349.00)
2008/2009* $4,753.00 $9,942.00 $(5,189.00)
2009/2010* $4,724.00 $7,091.00 $(2,367.00)
2010/2011* $4,827.00 $10,648.00 $(5,821.00)
2011/2012* $4,720.00 $11,127.00 $(6,407.00)
2012/2013* $4,720.00 $11,129.00 $(6,409.00)
2013/2014* $4,718.00 $8,174.00 $(3,456.00)
2014/2015* $4,696.00 $8,130.00 $(3,434.00)
2015/2016* $4,958.00 $8,643.00 $(3,685.00)
2016/2017* $4,885.00 $8,536.00 $(3,651.00)
2017/2018* $4,178.00 $11,957.00 $(7,779.00)
2018/2019* $4,739.00 $9,480.00 $(4,741.00)
2019/2020* $4,718.00 $13,717.00 $(8,999.00)
2020/2021* $4,699.00 $17,627.00 $(12,928.00)
2021/2022* $4,650.00 $19,701.00 $(15,051.00)
2022/2023* $4,529.86 $19,853.87 $(15,324.01)
2023/2024* $4,586.73 $25,437.92 $(21,128.00)
2024/2025* $4,602.00 $23,283.00 $(18,681.00)
2025/2026** $4,645.86 $24,282.89 $(19,637.03)
Total Estimated Subsidy to Zone 4*** $187,392.04 * Revenues and Expenditures tied to respective years Annual Comprehensive Financial Report ** Estimated Revenues and Expenditures based on actuals to date. ***Expenditures above reflect maintenance only; does not reflect costs incurred to when zone transitioned to xeriscaping.

ITEM 14
Subject: Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 97-01 (Zones 1, 2 ,3 & 4) Levy of FY 2026/2027 Assessments Date: July 8, 2026

Page 7 of 7 ends

Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, assessment districts of this type must be updated annually. A Resolution to Initiate Proceedings is required as the first action of the City Council in order to initiate the update of the LMADs. Subsequent approval of the assessments to be levied and collected will be for the purpose of meeting operating expenses and purchasing supplies, equipment, or materials necessary to maintain landscape facilities for the districts.

On June 24, 2026, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention for LMAD 97-01 (Zones 1, 2, 3, and 4) approving the Engineer’s Report; declaring its intention to order the annual update for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 to levy and collect assessments for the City of Citrus Heights Landscape Maintenance Assessment District; and setting Wednesday, July 8, 2026 at 6:00 p.m. (or shortly thereafter) as the date and time for the public hearing.

The Engineer’s Report summarizes maintenance efforts and proposes the assessment rates for Zones 1, 3 and 4 will not exceed the rate levied in Fiscal Year 2026/2027. The Engineer’s Report does recommend increasing the assessment for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 by 3% for Zone 2. The recommended increase is to help sustain existing reserves in the zone as well as maintain the current level of service.

Pursuant to State Law, the City must hold a public hearing on the matter for each District. Since an increase in assessments beyond the allowable annual increase per zone is not proposed and thus not triggering Prop 218, the code only requires the notice to be published in a newspaper and no ballot procedure or special notice will be necessary.

The assessment district diagrams and assessment rolls are contained in the Engineer’s Reports.

Attachments
1) Resolution No. 2026-____: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, to confirm the diagram and assessment and to levy Fiscal Year 2026/2027 assessments for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 97-01 (Zones 1, 2, 3 & 4). 2) Engineer’s Report
ITEM 14
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS

HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA, TO CONFIRM THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND TO LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027 ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-01 (ZONES 1, 2, 3 & 4)
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2026 the City Council (Council) of the City of Citrus Heights (City) adopted its Resolution No. 2026-041, initiating proceedings pursuant to the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being California Streets and Highways Code Sections 22500 et seq. (Act), to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 in the City of Citrus Heights Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 97-01 (Zones 1, 2, 3 & 4);
WHEREAS, as directed by this Council, the City Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk a report for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 (Engineer’s Report) in accordance with the Act; WHEREAS, on June 24, 2026, Council adopted its Resolution No. 2026-043, approving Engineer’s Report, and setting a public hearing date of July 8, 2026 at 6:00 p.m., at the Citrus Heights Council Chambers located at 6360 Fountain Square Drive, Citrus Heights, California 95621; WHEREAS, a notice of the public hearing was published in the form, time and manner required by law; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, Council duly heard all interested persons desiring to be heard.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights hereby declares that:

Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and the City Council so finds and determines.

Section 2. Approval of Engineer’s Report. This Council hereby approves the Engineer’s Report as now on file with the City Clerk.

Section 3. Improvements Ordered. This Council hereby orders the proposed improvements described in the Engineer’s Report to be made.

Section 4. Special Benefit Finding. This Council hereby finds and determines that the assessment included in the Engineer’s Report assesses all of the subdivisions of land in the assessment district for the special benefits provided by the improvements in proportion to the special benefits to be received by such subdivision, respectively, from the improvements.

Section 5. Confirmation of Assessment Diagram. This Council hereby confirms the diagram and the assessment now on file with it.

Section 6. Directive to file Diagram and Assessment. This Council hereby directs the City Clerk to file a certified copy of the diagram and the assessment as confirmed with the Sacramento County Auditor.

ITEM 14

Section 7. Entry on the Roll. The Sacramento County Auditor is hereby requested to enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown on the assessment filed by the City Clerk.

Section 8. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage.

The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 8th day of Ju1y 2026, by the following vote to wit:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

MariJane Lopez-Taff, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 14

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT
for
Landscape Maintenance Districts
Assessment District No. 97-01(Zones 1, 2, 3, & 4)
Annual Update for Fiscal Year 2026/2027
Prepared by:

Leslie Blomquist
City Engineer
June 30, 2026
ITEM 14
1 CERTIFICATIONS

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. 97-01, Zones 1, 2, 3 & 4
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026/2027
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council.

DATED: June 30, 2026

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
By ______________________________
Leslie Blomquist, P.E.

CITY ENGINEER
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the _______________ day of _________________, 2026.

Amy Van, City Clerk
City of Citrus Heights,
Sacramento County, California
By ______________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, on the _______________ day of ,2026.

Amy Van, City Clerk
City of Citrus Heights,
Sacramento County, California
By ______________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Sacramento on the _______________ day of __________________, 2026.

Amy Van, City Clerk
City of Citrus Heights,
Sacramento County, California
By ______________________________
ITEM 14
2 ENGINEER’S REPORT

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. 97-01, Zones 1, 2, 3, & 4
LEVY of FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027 ASSESSMENTS

INTRODUCTION
The City of Citrus Heights has four (4) separate Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts (LMADs), which provide for maintenance of common areas within nine (9) distinct communities around the City. This report addresses only LMAD 97-01, which contains four (4) separate zones. The general locations for Zones 1, 2, 3, & 4 are shown on the maps on the following pages.

The Sacramento County Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (SCLMAD) was created in 1994 by Sacramento County to consolidate eighteen separate landscape maintenance districts into a single district with five zones. Zones were established based on the type of landscaping, the frequency and level of service required and geographical location.

Upon incorporation, all of Zone 1, and part of Zones 2 and 4 of the SCLMAD fell within the boundaries of the City of Citrus Heights. As a result, the City created Assessment District 97-01 (AD 97-01) on August 13, 1997 to take over responsibility for the maintenance of the zones or portions of zones located within Citrus Heights. Subsequently, in 2004, the City split the existing Zone 4 into two separate zones, Zone 3 and Zone 4.

Funding for the District will be from annual assessments levied on property in the four zones.

The annual assessment levied on each property is related to the maintenance costs for the zone in which the parcel is located.

The following sections provide detailed explanations of each Zone. The corresponding Budget Assessment tables list the 2025/2026 sources of funds (revenues), uses of funds (direct and indirect expenditures), and the proposed assessment for each. Prior year expenditures and assessments are shown for comparison. The City has separated the accounting for each of the four zones; therefore, any noticing and balloting requirements for each of the zones will be treated independently.

ITEM 14
3 ITEM 14
4 ZONE 1
General:

Known as the Bridgemont Landscape Maintenance Zone, the limits of Zone 1 are defined by Van Maren Lane on the east; north and south of Bridgemont Way, and by Cripple Creek on the west. There are 80 parcels in this Zone, whose boundaries are particularly shown on the Assessment Diagram in Figure 1.1.

The landscape is a natural open space re-vegetation area along Cripple Creek and adjacent to Van Maren Lane. It consists of naturalized and mitigated oak tree stands and other California native plantings. An automatic drip irrigation system is no longer providing water to the revegetation plantings, because the plantings are already well established. Routine maintenance includes tree and shrub care, pruning, fertilization, and tree and shrub well maintenance. A minimum of two times per year, in the spring and summer, weed abatement is performed along the open space perimeter, adjacent to the homes within the district.

City performs/manages the maintenance for the LMAD using its own forces or those of contract providers. Figure 1.2 describes the maintenance specifications for the district.

District Financing/Method of Assessment:

Development of the single family Bridgemont subdivision was conditioned upon establishing a funding source to provide for ongoing landscape maintenance to the re-vegetation planting and open space area. The funding for Zone 1 is from annual assessments levied on residential parcels within the zone’s assessment boundary (Figure 1.1), pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Because each of the single-family lots within the Zone was created as a result of compliance with this condition, each lot benefits in the same proportion. Therefore, the assessment costs are allocated on a per parcel basis for all parcels located in Zone 1 that currently qualify as a buildable single-family parcel per the current City of Citrus Heights Zoning Ordinances. The original annual assessment adopted for Zone 1 upon formation in 1997 was $131.54.

This Zone does not have a cost of living increase provision.

Annual Assessment:

The annual costs for maintenance in Zone 1 have historically exceed total revenues from the assessments and the Zone’s cash reserves have been used to balance the annual budget.

However, this past year, adjustments have been made to preserve the districts reserves while still maintaining a level of service. This zone does not have a provision to increase the annual assessment levied on each parcel. Therefore, as shown in Figure 1.3. “Summary Analysis”, the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 assessments for District 97-01 Zone 1 are proposed to remain the same as the previous fiscal year, at $131.54 per parcel per year for a total annual assessment of $10,523.20. In the future it may be necessary to use other funding sources to cover anticipated shortfalls and/or seek approval of a cost-of-living increase provision through a property owner vote.

ITEM 14
5 The FY 2025/2026 Assessment Roll for Zone 1 is shown in Figure 1.4.

Zone 1 Boundary Description:

All that territory situated in the City of Citrus Heights, County of Sacramento, State of California, more particularly described as follows and as shown on the Assessment Diagram for Zone 1 in Figure 1.1.

Area Description:

All that real property included in the map of Bridgemont, as recorded in the office of the recorder of Sacramento County in Book 195 of Maps, Map number 10 on July 12, 1989.

FIGURE 1.1
ITEM 14
6 ITEM 14
7 FIGURE 1.3

SUMMARY ANALYSIS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 97-01 - ZONE 1
280-75-290; County DL 0270
DESCRIPTION FY 25/26
ACTUAL**
FY 26/27

PROPOSED
BUDGET
ASSESSMENT RATES:

Rate Per Parcel $ 131.54 $ 131.54
Total Number of Parcels 80 80
Total Special Assessments $ 10,523.20 $ 10,523.20
REVENUE:

Interest on Fund Balance $ 1,074.53 $ -
Special Assessments $ 10,450.00 $ 10,523.20
Total Revenue: 11,524.53 $ $ 10,523.20
EXPENDITURES:

Advertising & Mail $ - $ 382.00
Professional Services $ - $ -
Contract - Landscape/Tree
Maintenance/Vegetation Clearing $ 5,742.00 $ 10,000.00
Cost Allocation (Overhead) $ 5,608.35 $ -
Total Expenditures: $ 11,350.35 $ 10,382.00
$ 174.18 $ 141.20
Transfer to/from Operating Reserve $ (174.18) $ (141.20) $ - $ -

OPERATING RESERVE
Beginning Fund Balance (July 1st) $ 43,236.00 $ 43,410.18 Operating Reserve Set-a-side $ - $ -
Transfer from (to) Annual Operating Balance $ 174.18 $ 141.20 Ending Operating Reserve Balance (June 30th) $ 43,410.18 $ 43,551.38 **
$xx.xx
Annual Operating Balance
Annual Ending Balance
Recorded actual expenses for the first 3 quarters of the current Fiscal Year plus projections for the 4th quarter.

Audited Fund Balance from previous Fiscal Year
ITEM 14
8 FIGURE 1.4
ITEM 14
9 ZONE 2
General:

Known as the Heather Downs Landscape Maintenance Zone, the Zone 2 limits are defined by Old Auburn Road on the south, east and west of Wickham Drive; and Mariposa Avenue on the west, north and south of Heredia Way. There are 82 parcels in this Zone, whose boundaries are more particularly shown on the Assessment Diagram in Figure 2.1.

The maintained area in Zone 2 consists of two landscape types, a natural, open space, revegetation area, and a street frontage (corridor). It consists of naturalized and mitigated oak tree stands, other California native plantings and an automatic drip irrigation system providing water to the re-vegetation plantings. Routine maintenance includes tree and shrub care, pruning, fertilization, and tree and shrub well maintenance. A minimum of three times per year, weed abatement mowing is performed in the open space.

The street frontage landscape includes lawn, trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Ongoing street frontage maintenance requires weekly care of the lawn, trees, shrubs, and ground cover, including weed control, fertilization, pruning, and litter removal.

City performs/manages the maintenance for the LMAD using its own forces or those of contract providers. Figure 2.2 describes the maintenance specifications for the district.

District Financing/Method of Assessment:

As a condition of approval, the developer of this single family subdivision was required to establish a funding source to provide ongoing landscape maintenance. The funding for Zone 2 is from annual assessments levied on residential parcels within the zone’s assessment boundary (Figure 2.1), pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Because each of the singlefamily lots within the Zone was created as a result of compliance with this condition, each lot benefits in the same proportion. Therefore, the assessment costs are allocated on a per parcel basis for all parcels located in Zone 2 that currently qualify as a buildable single-family parcel per the current City of Citrus Heights Zoning Ordinances. The original annual assessment adopted for Zone 2 upon formation was $122.74.

The original assessment amount per parcel was insufficient to fund the Zone 2 services after just a few years, so General Fund money was used to supplement this zone. However, in Fiscal Year 2000/2001 the property owners within this zone voted to approve an assessment increase from $122.74 to $151.38 per parcel.

Concurrent with the approval of the assessment increase in FY 2000/2001, the property owners also voted to include a cost of living adjustment provision for Zone 2. This provision allows for an increase in the annual assessment with the percent of increase over the previous annual assessment being less than or equal to the cost of living increase based on the Bay Area Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers. In FY 2023/2024, the City began to exercise the option to adjust the assessments to inflation.

ITEM 14
10 Annual Assessment:

An adjustment in the annual assessment per parcel is proposed for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.

Maintenance and replacement costs for Zone 2 have continued to increase beyond the amount of revenue generated by the previous annual assessment. As a result, the City of Citrus Heights must increase the annual assessment on each assessed parcel. As shown in Figure 2.3. “Summary Analysis”, the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 assessments for District 97-01 Zone 2 are proposed to increase by 3% (rounded) to an amount of $168.70 per residential parcel. These additional revenues are necessary to support the Zone’s operations and maintenance as well as help to restore an appropriate operating reserve.

The FY 2026/2027 Assessment Roll for Zone 2 is shown in Figure 2.4.

Zone 2 Boundary:

Area Description:

All that real property included in the revised map of Heather Downs Two, as recorded in the office of the recorder of Sacramento County in Book 206 of Maps, Map number 2; July, 1991.

FIGURE 2.1
ITEM 14
11 ITEM 14
12 FIGURE 2.3

SUMMARY ANALYSIS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 97-02 – ZONE 2
281-75-291; County DL 0271
DESCRIPTION FY 25/26
ACTUAL**
FY 26/27

PROPOSED
BUDGET
ASSESSMENT RATES:

Rate Per Parcel $ 163.80 $ 168.70
Total Number of Parcels 82 82
Total Special Assessments $ 13,431.60 $ 13,833.40
REVENUE:

Interest on Fund Balance $ 879.57 $ -
Special Assessments $ 13,338.92 $ 13,833.40
Total Revenue: 14,218.49 $ $ 13,833.40
EXPENDITURES:

Advertising & Mail $ - $ 400.00
Utilities $ 3,446.97 $ 2,200.00
Professional Services $ - $ 1,000.00
Contract - Landscape/Tree Maintenance $ 6,540.00 $ 7,500.00 Contract - Construction, Repairs & Extra Work $ - $ -
Cost Allocation (Overhead) $ 5,671.18 $ -
Total Expenditures: $ 15,658.15 $ 11,100.00
$ (1,439.66) $ 2,733.40
Transfer to/from Operating Reserve $ 1,439.66 $ (2,733.40) $ - $ -

OPERATING RESERVE
Beginning Fund Balance (July 1st) $ 22,936.00 $ 21,496.34 Operating Reserve Set-a-side $ - $ -
Transfer from (to) Annual Operating Balance $ (1,439.66) $ 2,733.40 Ending Operating Reserve Balance (June 30th) $ 21,496.34 $ 24,229.74 ** Recorded actual expenses for the first 3 quarters of the current Fiscal Year plus projections for the 4th quarter. $xx.xx Audited Fund Balance from previous Fiscal Year
Annual Operating Balance
Annual Ending Balance
ITEM 14
13 FIGURE 2.4
Assessment Assessment
224 0910 001 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 042 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 002 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 043 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 003 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 044 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 004 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 045 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 005 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 046 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 006 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 047 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 007 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 048 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 008 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 049 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 009 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 050 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 010 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 051 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 011 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 052 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 012 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 053 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 013 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 054 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 014 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 055 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 015 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 056 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 016 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 057 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 017 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 058 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 018 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 059 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 019 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 062 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 020 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 063 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 021 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 064 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 022 0000 $ 168.70 224 0910 065 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 023 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 001 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 024 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 002 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 025 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 003 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 026 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 006 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 027 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 007 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 028 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 008 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 029 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 009 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 030 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 010 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 031 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 011 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 032 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 012 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 033 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 013 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 034 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 014 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 035 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 015 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 036 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 016 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 037 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 017 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 038 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 019 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 039 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 023 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 040 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 024 0000 $ 168.70
224 0910 041 0000 $ 168.70 224 0920 027 0000 $ 168.70
Subtotal = $ 6,916.70 Subtotal = $ 6,916.70
82 Parcels; Total Zone 2 Assessment is $ 13,833.40
Assessment Number Assessment Number
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 97-01 ZONE 2
ITEM 14
14 ZONE 3
General:

Zone 4 of LMAD 97-01, as originally adopted by the City, consisted of two widely separated landscape areas with differing landscape types and maintenance responsibilities. In 2004, the City Council adopted a resolution dividing Zone 4 into two parts and thereby creating Zone 3 (previously non-existent). Zone 3 consists of the Verner Glen Subdivision (commonly known as Summerhill). There are 80 parcels in this Zone, whose boundaries are particularly shown on the Assessment Diagram in Figure 3.1.

The maintained area in Zone 3 consists of street frontage landscape including lawn, trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Ongoing street frontage maintenance requires weekly care of the lawn, trees, shrubs, and ground cover, including weed control, fertilization, pruning, and litter removal.

City performs/manages the maintenance for the LMAD using its own forces or those of contract providers. Figure 3.2 describes the maintenance specifications for the district.

District Financing/Method of Assessment:

As a condition of approval, the developer of two single family subdivisions comprising the original Zone 4 was required to establish a funding source to provide ongoing landscape maintenance. The funding was from annual assessments levied on residential parcels within the zone’s assessment boundaries, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Because each of the single-family lots within the Zone was created as a result of compliance with this condition, each lot benefits in the same proportion. Therefore, the assessment costs are allocated on a per parcel basis for all parcels located within the assessment boundaries that currently qualify as a buildable single-family parcel per the current City of Citrus Heights Zoning Ordinances. The original annual assessment adopted for Zone 4 upon formation was $42.50.

Upon separation in 2004, the original annual assessment of $42.50 was carried over to Zone 3.

General Fund money was used to supplement maintenance of landscaped areas in Zone 3 in the past. To eliminate the assessment revenue shortfall, an increase in assessment was proposed in Fiscal Year 98/99, but was unanimously opposed by the property owners in the required balloting process. In 2005 an increase in the annual assessment was again proposed and subsequently the property owners approved a one-time increase in the assessment from $42.50 to $81.88.

Concurrent with the assessment increase in 2005, a cost of living adjustment provision was proposed for Zone 3. However, during the property owner balloting process, this provision failed.

Annual Assessment:

The assessment increase approved in 2005 along with focused efforts to reduce overall maintenance costs kept Zone 3 expenditures below available revenues for several years.

However, increased monthly utility costs and the implementation of updated cost allocation ITEM 14
15 procedures by the City have resulted in a shortfall of approximately $9,874.64 for FY 2025/2026. With no current reserves, this shortfall was subsidized by Gas Tax funds. A shortfall of approximately $4,749.60 is anticipated for FY 2026/2027, pending revisions to the city’s cost allocations.

The Summary Analysis in Figure 3.3 shows details of the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 budget and assessments for Zone 3. The assessments for Zone 3 are proposed to remain the same as Fiscal Year 2025/2026 at $81.88 per parcel per year for a total annual assessment of $6,550.40, as this district does not allow for increasing the assessments without a vote of the effected property owners.

The FY 2026/2027 Assessment Roll for Zone 3 is shown in Figure 3.4.

Zone 3 Boundary Description:

All that territory situated in the City of Citrus Heights, County of Sacramento, State of California, more particularly described as follows and as shown on the Assessment Diagram in Figure 3.1.

Area Description:

All that real property included in the Plat of Verner Glen, as recorded in the office of the recorder of Sacramento County in Book 181 of Maps, Map number 21, on March 1988.

FIGURE 3.1
ITEM 14
16 ITEM 14
17 FIGURE 3.3

SUMMARY ANALYSIS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 97-01 – ZONE 3
288-75-298; County DOL 0279
DESCRIPTION FY 25/26
ACTUAL**
FY 26/27

PROPOSED
BUDGET
ASSESSMENT RATES:

Rate Per Parcel $ 81.88 $ 81.88
Total Number of Parcels 80 80
Total Special Assessments: $ 6,550.40 $ 6,550.40
REVENUE:

Interest on Fund Balance $ - $ -
Special Assessments $ 6,459.20 $ 6,550.40
Total Revenue: 6,459.20 $ $ 6,550.40
EXPENDITURES:

Advertising & Mail $ - $ -
Utilities $ 3,471.72 $ 3,600.00
Professional Services $ - $ -
Contract - Landscape Maintenance & Extra Work $ 7,296.00 $ 7,700.00 Contract - Tree Maintenance $ - $ -
Contract -Materials & Supplies $ - $ -
Cost Allocation (Overhead) $ 5,566.12 $ -
Total Expenditures: $ 16,333.84 $ 11,300.00
$ (9,874.64) $ (4,749.60)
Transfer to/from Operating Reserve $ 9,874.64 $ 4,749.60 $ - $ -

OPERATING RESERVE
Beginning Fund Balance (July 1st) $ - $ -
Operating Reserve Set-a-side $ - $ -
Transfer from (to) Annual Operating Balance $ (9,874.64) $ (4,749.60) Ending Operating Reserve Balance (June 30th) $ (9,874.64) $ (4,749.60) **
Annual Operating Balance
Annual Ending Balance
Recorded actual expenses for the first 3 quarters of the current Fiscal Year plus projections for the 4th quarter.

ITEM 14
18 FIGURE 3.4
ITEM 14
19 ZONE 4
General:

Zone 4 of LMAD 97-01 was originally adopted by the City in 1997. The original zone consisted of the Summerhill Subdivision and the Villa Creekridge Subdivision. These two single family subdivisions were on opposite sides of the City and had widely differing landscaping and maintenance responsibilities.

As a result of the different geographical locations and maintenance responsibilities, the City Council adopted a resolution in 2004 to divide Zone 4 into two parts. The Verner Glenn (Summerhill subdivision) was incorporated into the newly created Zone 3 and the 111 parcel Villa Creekridge Subdivision remained in Zone 4. Figure 4.1 shows the current boundaries of Zone 4.

Originally the maintained area in Zone 4 consisted of street frontage landscape including lawn, trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Ongoing street frontage maintenance requires weekly care of the lawn, trees, shrubs, and ground cover, including weed control, fertilization, pruning, and litter removal.

Over the years General Fund money has been used to supplement maintenance in Zone 4. To reduce the assessment revenue shortfall, staff repeatedly re-evaluated and adjusted the maintenance effort to reduce costs. In July 2007, the City Council approved detaching a portion of the maintained area from Zone 4 (landscaping along Fireweed Circle). This detached area is now maintained by a neighboring Homeowner’s Association under a special agreement. In 2010 the City implemented a xeriscaping (low-water and maintenance) plan to eliminate some of the more labor intensive and water consuming landscape features, such as turf, and reduced the level of service on the remaining landscaping to a minimum. In a further effort to reduce subsidies, in 2011, the City conducted a pilot project that reduced the frequency of maintenance (i.e. every 6 or 8 weeks instead of monthly). However, the monthly maintenance schedule was reinstated due to complaints on its appearance from the public.

Zone 4 now consists of street frontage landscape including trees, shrubs, and ground cover; all with monthly maintenance.

The City performs/manages the maintenance for the LMAD using its own forces or those of contract providers. Figure 4.2 describes the maintenance specifications for the district.

District Financing/Method of Assessment:

Because each of the single-family lots within the Zone was created as a result of compliance with this condition, each lot benefits in the same proportion. Therefore, the assessment costs are allocated on a per parcel basis for all parcels located within the assessment boundaries that ITEM 14
20 currently qualify as a buildable single-family parcel per the current City of Citrus Heights Zoning Ordinances. The original annual assessment adopted for Zone 4 upon formation was $42.50. Upon separation in 2004, the annual assessment for Zone 4 remained at $42.50 per assessed parcel.

General Fund money has been used to supplement maintenance of landscaped areas in Zone 4 in the past. To eliminate the assessment revenue shortfall, assessment increases were proposed in Fiscal Years 98/99, 2005/2006 and 2009/2010, but all attempts failed under majority opposition by the property owners in the required balloting process.

This Zone does not have a cost of living increase provision.

Annual Assessment:

From the beginning, General Fund revenues have been used to subsidize Zone 4 maintenance.

Efforts such as detaching part of the maintained area, replanting with low-water and low maintenance landscaping and even reducing the maintenance frequency have resulted in significant reductions in maintenance and utility costs, but the gap between maintenance expenditures and assessment revenues continues to widen.

The Summary Analysis in Figure 4.3 shows details of the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 budget and assessments for Zone 4. The assessments for Zone 4 are proposed to remain the same as Fiscal Year 2025/2026, at $42.50 per parcel per year for a total annual assessment of $4,717.50, as this district does not allow for increasing the assessments without a vote of the effected property owners. For FY 2025/2026 the projected budget shortfall is $19,637.03 and again Gas Tax revenues are being budgeted to cover the shortfall. A shortfall of approximately $14,732.50 is anticipated for FY 2026/2027, pending revisions to the city’s cost allocations.

The FY 2024/2025 Assessment Roll for Zone 4 is shown in 4.4.

Zone 4 Boundary Description:

Area Description:

All that real property included in the Plat of Villa Creekridge, as recorded in the office of the recorder of Sacramento County Book 188 of Maps, Map number 3; December, 1988.

ITEM 14
21 FIGURE 4.1
ITEM 14
22 ITEM 14
23 FIGURE 4.3
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 97-01 – ZONE 4
282-75-292; County DOL 0272
DESCRIPTION FY 25/26
ACTUAL**
FY 26/27

PROPOSED
BUDGET
ASSESSMENT RATES:

Rate Per Parcel $ 42.50 $ 42.50
Total Number of Parcels 111 111
Total Special Assessments $ 4,717.50 $ 4,717.50
REVENUE:

Interest on Fund Balance $ - $ -
Special Assessments $ 4,645.86 $ 4,717.50
Total Revenues: 4,645.86 $ $ 4,717.50
EXPENDITURES:

Advertising $ -
Utilities - Electric $ 921.50 $ 950.00
Utilities - Water $ 7,971.27 $ 8,200.00
Professional Services $ - $ -
Contract - Landscape Maintenance $ 9,492.00 $ 9,800.00
Contract - Construction, Repairs & Extra Work $ 332.00 $ 500.00 Contract - Materials & Supplies $ - $ -
Cost Allocation (Overhead) $ 5,566.12 $ -
Total Expenditures: $ 24,282.89 $ 19,450.00
$ (19,637.03) $ (14,732.50)
Transfer to/from Operating Reserve $ 19,637.03 $ 14,732.50 $ - $ -

OPERATING RESERVE
Beginning Fund Balance (July 1st) $ - $ -
Operating Reserve Set-a-side $ - $ -
Transfer from (to) Annual Operating Balance $ (19,637.03) $ (14,732.50) Ending Operating Reserve Balance (June 30th) $ (19,637.03) $ (14,732.50)

FACILITY REPLACEMENT RESERVE
Beginning Facility Replacement Balance (July 1st) $ - $ - Facility Replacement Set-aside $ - $ -
Replacement Project Cost $ - $ -
Ending Facility Replacement Balance (June 30th) $ - $ - ** Recorded actual expenses for the first 3 quarters of Fiscal Year plus projection for the 4th quarter.

Annual Operating Balance
Annual Ending Balance
ITEM 14
24 FIGURE 4.4
ITEM 14
25 ITEM 14

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 8, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Regina Cave, General Services Director
Leslie Blomquist, City Engineer

SUBJECT: Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts 98-01, 98-02 and 03-01 Levy of Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Assessments

Recommendation
On June 24, 2026, City Council took the first steps toward the proposed annual update for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 for the Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts (LMAD) 98-01, 98-02 (Zones 1, 2, 3 and 4), and 03-01 (Zones 1, 2 and 3). At that time, Council adopted Resolutions of Intention to update the districts and called for public hearings on July 8, 2026. Subsequently, the City Clerk published the required notice.

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Convene the public hearing for the district regarding the proposed annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

2. Resolution No. 2026-____: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, to Confirm the Diagram and Assessment and to Levy Fiscal Year 2026/2027 assessments for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 98-01 (Stock Village Units Nos. 1 and 2).

3. Resolution No. 2026-____: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, to Confirm the Diagram and Assessment and to Levy Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Assessments for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 98-02 (Zone 1: Sorenson Ranch, Zone 2: Autumnwood, Zone 3: Mariposa Creek and Zone 4: Wyatt Ranch).

4. Resolution No. 2026-____: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, to Confirm the Diagram and Assessment and to Levy Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Assessments for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 03-01 (Stock Ranch Zones 1: Stock Ranch North, Zone 2: Stock Ranch South and Zone 3: Mitchell Farms).

ITEM 15
Subject: Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts 98-01, 98-02 & 03-01 – Levy of Assessments for Fiscal Year 26/27 Date: July 8, 2026

Page 2 of 7 ends

Fiscal Impact
Assessment Districts 98-01, 98-02 (Zones 1, 2, 3 and 4), and 03-01 (Zones 1, 2 and 3) are currently fully funded by their annual assessments and operating reserves as needed; therefore, there is no fiscal impact to the General Fund for these districts. The following tables (Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8) summarize the revenues and expenditures for each of the districts/zones) contained in the engineer’s report:

Table No. 1
98-01 Stock Village
Description FY 25/26 Actual FY 26/27 Proposed
REVENUE:

Special Assessments Revenues $11,680.63 $12,209.40
Interest on Fund Balance (1) $3,171.64 $0.00
Total Estimated Revenues $14,852.27 $12,209.40
EXPENDITURES:

Total Estimated Expenditures $27,050.74 $12,453.00
Annual Operating Balance (2) -$12,198.47 -$243.60
(1) Interest earnings estimated; will reflect actuals in Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. (2) Assessment Fund reserves available to balance the annual operating shortfall.

Table No. 2
98-02, Zone 1 – Sorenson Ranch
Description FY 25/26 Actual FY 26/27 Proposed
REVENUE:

Special Assessments Revenues $24,328.39 $25,481.16
Interest on Fund Balance (1) $1,148.87 $0.00
Total Estimated Revenues $25,477.26 $25,481.16
EXPENDITURES:

Total Estimated Expenditures $27,910.16 $25,481.16
Annual Operating Balance (2) -$2,432.90 $3,856.16
(1) Interest earnings estimated; will reflect actuals in Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. (2) Assessment Fund reserves available to balance the annual operating shortfall.

ITEM 15
Subject: Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts 98-01, 98-02 & 03-01 – Levy of Assessments for Fiscal Year 26/27 Date: July 8, 2026

Page 3 of 7 ends

Table No. 3
98-02, Zone 2 - Autumnwood
Description FY 25/26 Actual* FY 26/27 Proposed
REVENUE:

Special Assessments Revenues $18,086.48 $18,696.24
Interest on Fund Balance (1) $1,090.67 $0.00
Total Estimated Revenues $19,177.15 $18,696.24
EXPENDITURES:

Total Estimated Expenditures $12,694.12 $11,425.00
Annual Operating Balance (2) $6,483.03 $7,271.24
*Recorded actual expenses for first 3 quarters plus estimates for remainder of fiscal. (1) Interest earnings estimated; will reflect actuals in Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. (2) Balance transferred to Assessment Fund reserve.

Table No. 4
98-02, Zone 3 – Mariposa Creek
Description FY 25/26 Actual* FY 26/27 Proposed
REVENUE:

Special Assessments Revenues $12,550.90 $12,971.70
Interest on Fund Balance (1) $1,131.99 $0.00
Total Estimated Revenues $13,682.89 $12,971.70
EXPENDITURES:

Total Estimated Expenditures $17,034.43 $6,925.00
Annual Operating Balance (2) -$3,351.54 $6,046.70
*Recorded actual expenses for first 3 quarters plus estimates for remainder of fiscal. (1) Interest earnings estimated; will reflect actuals in Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. (2) Assessment Fund reserves available to balance the annual operating shortfall.

ITEM 15
Subject: Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts 98-01, 98-02 & 03-01 – Levy of Assessments for Fiscal Year 26/27 Date: July 8, 2026

Page 4 of 7 ends

Table No. 5
98-02, Zone 4 – Wyatt Ranch
Description FY 25/26 Actual* FY 26/27 Proposed
REVENUE:

Special Assessments Revenues $9,736.82 $9,690.82
Interest on Fund Balance (1) $317.59 $0.00
Total Estimated Revenues $10,054.41 $9,690.82
EXPENDITURES:

Total Estimated Expenditures $0.00 $3,725.00
Annual Operating Balance (2) $10,054.41 $5,965.82
*Recorded actual expenses for first 3 quarters plus estimates for remainder of fiscal. (1) Interest earnings estimated; will reflect actuals in Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. (2) Balance transferred to Assessment Fund reserve.

Table No. 6
03-01, Zone 1 – Stock Ranch NORTH
Description FY 25/26 Actual* FY 26/27 Proposed
REVENUE:

Special Assessments Revenues $98,820.45 $101,827.10
Interest on Fund Balance (1) $20,749.31 $0.00
Total Estimated Revenues $119,569.76 $101,827.10
EXPENDITURES:

Total Estimated Expenditures $147,216.59 $119,600.00
Annual Operating Balance (2) -$27,646.83 -$17,772.90
*Recorded actual expenses for first 3 quarters plus estimates for remainder of fiscal. (1) Interest earnings estimated; will reflect actuals in Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. (2) Assessment Fund reserves available to balance the annual operating shortfall.

ITEM 15
Subject: Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts 98-01, 98-02 & 03-01 – Levy of Assessments for Fiscal Year 26/27 Date: July 8, 2026

Page 5 of 7 ends

Table No. 7
03-01, Zone 2 – Stock Ranch SOUTH
Description FY 25/26 Actual* FY 26/27 Proposed
REVENUE:

Special Assessments Revenues $22,490.56 $23,299.38
Interest on Fund Balance (1) $1,117.00 $0.00
Total Estimated Revenues $23,607.56 $23,299.38
EXPENDITURES:

Total Estimated Expenditures $21,265.74 $19,675.00
Annual Operating Balance (2) $1,224.82 $3,624.38
*Recorded actual expenses for first 3 quarters plus estimates for remainder of fiscal. (1) Interest earnings estimated; will reflect actuals in Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. (2) Balance transferred to Assessment Fund reserve.

Table No. 8
03-01, Zone 3 – Mitchell Farms
Description FY 25/26 Actual* FY 26/27 Proposed
REVENUE:

Special Assessments Revenues $92,765.55 $96,135.96
Interest on Fund Balance (1) $5,980.56 $0.00
Total Estimated Revenues $98,746.11 $96,135.96
EXPENDITURES:

Total Estimated Expenditures (2) $75,461.77 $96,135.96
Annual Operating Balance (3) $23,284.34 $0.00
*Recorded actual expenses for first 3 quarters plus estimates for remainder of fiscal. (1) Interest earnings estimated; will reflect actuals in Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. (2) Balance transferred to Assessment Fund reserve.

Continually increasing utility rates and monthly maintenance costs as well as updated methods for allocation of the City’s overhead costs have all contributed to an overall increase in district expenditures.

Background and Analysis
The City currently has four (4) landscape maintenance districts with several zones in some of the districts.

ITEM 15
Subject: Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts 98-01, 98-02 & 03-01 – Levy of Assessments for Fiscal Year 26/27 Date: July 8, 2026

Page 6 of 7 ends

Assessment
District
Zone Creation
Date
Location
97-01 1 1997 “Bridgemont” subdivision off of Van Maren Lane 2 1997 “St. Andrews Court” subdivision off of Old Auburn Road 3 1997 “Verner Glenn” (Summerhill) subdivision off of Verner Avenue 4 1997 “Villa Creekridge” subdivision off of Oak Avenue 98-01 1 1998 “Stock Village Unit No. 1 & 2” Subdivision off of Stock Ranch Road
98-02 1 1998 “Sorenson Ranch” subdivision off of Van Maren Lane 2 2014 “Autumnwood” subdivision off of Antelope Road
3 2018 “Mariposa Creek” subdivision off Antelope Road
4 2019 “Wyatt Ranch” subdivision off Sunrise Boulevard
03-01 1 2003 “Stock Ranch” development on Auburn Blvd - properties north of Arcade Creek
2 2003 “Stock Ranch” development off of Stock Ranch Road – properties south of Arcade Creek
3 2020 “Mitchell Farms” subdivision between Sunrise Boulevard and Fair Oaks Boulevard, north of Arcadia Drive.

This agenda item addresses LMADs 98-01, 98-02, and 03-01 (LMAD 97-01 is addressed under a separate agenda item). Specific maintenance responsibilities for each of these districts are discussed in the Engineer’s Report.

On June 24, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolutions of Intention for each of the three LMADs approving the Engineer’s Report, declaring its intention to order the annual update for Fiscal Year 2026/2027, to levy and collect assessments for the City of Citrus Heights Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts, and setting Wednesday, July 8, 2026 at 6:00 p.m. (or shortly thereafter) as the time and date for the public hearings.

The annual update and the levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 for the Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts Nos. 98-01, 98-02 (Zones 1, 2, 3 and 4) and 03-01 (Zones 1, 2 and 3), proposed by the resolutions will fund the following: maintenance and servicing of landscaping, trees, and other vegetation, and related or appurtenant facilities, including weeding, fertilizing, pruning, and controlling fungus, disease and insect infestation; operation of irrigation and drainage systems including the provision of water and power, and maintenance of sound walls.

The Engineer’s Report summarizes maintenance efforts and recommends increasing assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 by 3% (4% maximum allowed) for Districts 98-01; 98-02 Zones 1, 2, 3 and 4; and 03-01 Zones 1, 2 and 3. The recommended increases are to maintain current levels of services, sustain existing reserves in each of the respected zones and ensure sufficient reserve for the two zones (98-02 Zone 4, and 03-01 Zone 3) prior to the City and/or Sunrise Recreation and Park District assuming maintenance responsibility of the Zones. The assessment district diagrams and assessment rolls for these assessment districts are contained in the Engineer’s Reports.

ITEM 15
Subject: Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts 98-01, 98-02 & 03-01 – Levy of Assessments for Fiscal Year 26/27 Date: July 8, 2026

Page 7 of 7 ends

Attachments

1. Resolution No. 2026-____: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, to Confirm the Diagram and Assessment and to Levy Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Assessments for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 98-01 (Stock Village Units Nos. 1 and 2).

2. Resolution No. 2026-____: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, to Confirm the Diagram and Assessment and to Levy Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Assessments for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 98-02 (Zone 1:

Sorenson Ranch, Zone 2: Autumnwood, Zone 3: Mariposa Creek and Zone 4: Wyatt Ranch).

3. Resolution No. 2026-____: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, to Confirm the Diagram and Assessment and to Levy Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Assessments for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 03-01 (Zone 1: Stock Ranch North, Zone 2: Stock Ranch South and Zone 3: Mitchell Farms).

4. Engineer’s Report
ITEM 15
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS

HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA, TO CONFIRM THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND TO LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027 ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-01 (STOCK VILLAGE UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2) WHEREAS, on June 24, 2026, the City Council (Council) of the City of Citrus Heights (City) adopted its Resolution No. 2026-44, initiating proceedings pursuant to the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being California Streets and Highways Code Sections 22500 et seq. (Act), to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 in the City of Citrus Heights Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 98-01 (Stock Village Units Nos. 1 and 2); WHEREAS, as directed by this Council, the City Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk a report for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 (Engineer’s Report) in accordance with the Act; WHEREAS, on June 24, 2026, Council adopted its Resolution No. 2026-47, approving Engineer’s Report, and setting a public hearing date of July 8, 2026 at 6:00 p.m., at the Citrus Heights Council Chambers located at 6360 Fountain Square Drive, Citrus Heights, California 95621; WHEREAS, a notice of the public hearing was published in the form, time and manner required by law; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the Council duly heard all interested persons desiring to be heard.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights hereby declares that:

Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and the Council so finds and determines.

Section 2. Approval of Engineer’s Report. This Council hereby approves the Engineer’s Report as now on file with the City Clerk.

Section 3. Improvements Ordered. This Council hereby orders the proposed improvements described in the Engineer’s Report to be made.

Section 5. Confirmation of Assessment Diagram. This Council hereby confirms the diagram and the assessment now on file with it.

ITEM 15

Section 8. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage.

The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 8th day of July 2026 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

MariJane Lopez-Taff, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 15
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS,

CALIFORNIA, TO CONFIRM THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND TO LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027 ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-02 (ZONE 1: SORENSON RANCH,
ZONE 2: AUTUMNWOOD, ZONE 3: MARIPOSA CREEK and ZONE 4: WYATT RANCH) WHEREAS, on June 24, 2026, the City Council (Council) of the City of Citrus Heights (City) adopted its Resolution No. 2026-045, initiating proceedings pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being California Streets and Highways Code Sections 22500 et seq. (Act), to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 in the City of Citrus Heights Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 98-02 (Zone 1: Sorenson Ranch, Zone 2: Autumnwood, Zone 3: Mariposa Creek and Zone 4: Wyatt Ranch);
WHEREAS, as directed by this Council, the City Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk a report for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 (Engineer’s Report) in accordance with the Act; WHEREAS, on June 24, 2026, the Council adopted its Resolution No. 2026-048 approving Engineer’s Report, and setting a public hearing date of July 8, 2026, at 6:00 p.m., at the Citrus Heights Council Chambers located at 6360 Fountain Square Drive, Citrus Heights, California 95621; WHEREAS, a notice of the public hearing was published in the form, time and manner required by law; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the Council duly heard all interested persons desiring to be heard.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights hereby declares that:

Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and the Council so finds and determines.

Section 2. Approval of Engineer’s Report. This Council hereby approves the Engineer’s Report as now on file with the City Clerk.

Section 3. Improvements Ordered. This Council hereby orders the proposed improvements described in the Engineer’s Report to be made.

Section 5. Confirmation of Assessment Diagram. This Council hereby confirms the diagram and the assessment now on file with it.

ITEM 15

Section 8. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage.

The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 8th day of July 2026 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

MariJane Lopez-Taff, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 15
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS,

CALIFORNIA, TO CONFIRM THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND TO LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027 ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 03-01
(ZONE 1: STOCK RANCH NORTH, ZONE 2: STOCK RANCH SOUTH
and ZONE 3: MITCHELL FARMS)
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2026, the City Council (Council) of the City of Citrus Heights (City) adopted its Resolution No. 2026-46, initiating proceedings pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being California Streets and Highways Code Sections 22500 et seq. (Act), to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 in the City of Citrus Heights Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 03-01 (Zone 1: Stock Ranch North, Zone 2: Stock Ranch South and Zone 3:

Mitchell Farms);
WHEREAS, as directed by this Council, the City Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk a report for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 (Engineer’s Report) in accordance with the Act; WHEREAS, on June 24, 2026 the Council adopted its Resolution No. 2026-49, approving Engineer’s Report, and setting a public hearing date of July 8, 2026 at 6:00 p.m., at the Citrus Heights Council Chambers located at 6360 Fountain Square Drive, Citrus Heights, California 95621; WHEREAS, a notice of the public hearing was published in the form, time and manner required by law; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the Council duly heard all interested persons desiring to be heard.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights hereby declares that:

Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and the Council so finds and determines.

Section 2. Recitals Approval of Engineer’s Report. This Council hereby approves the Engineer’s Report as now on file with the City Clerk.

Section 3. Improvements Ordered. This Council hereby orders the proposed improvements described in the Engineer’s Report to be made.

Section 5. Confirmation of Assessment Diagram. This Council hereby confirms the diagram and the assessment now on file with it.

ITEM 15

Section 8. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage.

The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 8th day of July, 2026 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

MariJane Lopez-Taff, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 15

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT
for
Landscape Maintenance Districts
Assessment District Numbers: 98-01, 98-02 and 03-01
Annual Update for Fiscal Year 2026/2027
Prepared by:

Leslie Blomquist
City Engineer
June 30, 2026
ITEM 15
1 CERTIFICATIONS

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NUMBERS: 98-01, 98-02 and 03-01
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026/2027
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council.

DATED: June 30, 2026

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
By ______________________________
Leslie Blomquist, P.E.

CITY ENGINEER
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the ____________ day of _______________, 2026.

Amy Van, City Clerk
City of Citrus Heights,
Sacramento County, California
By ______________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Sacramento on the ____________ day of __________________, 2026.

Amy Van, City Clerk
City of Citrus Heights,
Sacramento County, California
By ______________________________
ITEM 15
2 ENGINEER’S REPORT

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-01, Stock Village Unit Nos. 1 & 2 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-02, Zone 1, Sorensen Ranch
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-02, Zone 2, Autumnwood
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-02, Zone 3, Mariposa Creek
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-02, Zone 4, Wyatt Ranch
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 03-01, Zone 1, Stock Ranch NORTH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 03-01, Zone 2, Stock Ranch SOUTH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 03-01, Zone 3, Mitchell Farms
LEVY of FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026 ASSESSMENTS

INTRODUCTION
The City of Citrus Heights has four (4) separate landscape maintenance assessment districts, which provide for maintenance of common areas within nine (9) distinct communities around the City.

This Engineer’s Report addresses three of the Districts, 98-01, 98-02 (Zones 1, 2, 3 and 4), and 03-01 (Zones 1, 2 and 3). The general locations of these districts are shown on the maps on the following pages.

Assessment District 98-01, first created in 1998, is for the maintenance of certain areas within the subdivision called Stock Village Unit No. 1 and Unit No. 2. A Strip of land along the west edge of the subdivision and a strip of land along the east edge, adjacent to Stock Ranch Road are the areas to be maintained.

Assessment District 98-02 (Zone 1), first created in 1998, is for the maintenance of certain areas within and adjacent to the subdivisions called Sorensen Ranch Unit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 development. All improvements are on public property. The improved parcels to be maintained are along the west side of Van Maren Lane (approximately 1500 feet); along the north side of Oak Lakes Lane (approximately 1300 feet); and shorter parcels along Campfire Way at Van Maren Lane (approximately 100 feet on the south side); Horseman Way at Van Maren Lane (approximately 100 feet on the north and south side); and the east side of Silversaddle Way at Oak Lake Lane (approximately 100 feet).

Assessment District 98-02 (Zone 2), first created in 2014, is for the maintenance of certain areas within and adjacent to the Autumnwood Subdivision development. All improvements are on public property. The improved parcels to be maintained are along the south side of Antelope Road (approximately 300 feet); along the east side of Live Oak Way (approximately 370 feet); and two (2) detention basins within the subdivision.

Assessment District 98-02 (Zone 3), first created in 2018, is for the maintenance of certain areas within and adjacent to the Mariposa Creek Subdivision development. All improvements are on public property. The improved parcels to be maintained are along the north side of Antelope Road ITEM 15
3 (approximately 436 feet); along Cripple Creek (approximately 185 lineal feet) located on the east side of the development; a pedestrian pathway with landscaping (Lot C) within the subdivision.

Assessment District 98-02, (Zone 4), provides for the maintenance of landscaping in certain dedicated public spaces within the Wyatt Ranch Subdivision. First annexed into Assessment District 98-02 by the City Council on November 14, 2019, the assessments for this 23 lot singlefamily parcel residential subdivision located on Lawrence Avenue on the west side of Sunrise Boulevard began in fiscal year 2022/2023. Completion of construction of the subdivision and acceptance of the public improvements was expected in 2024/2025. While construction is still in progress, the City will continue to levy funds to ensure a well-established replacement fund prior to taking on the maintenance of this zone.

Assessment District 03-01 (Zones 1 & 2), first created in 2003, is for the maintenance of certain areas within the commercial and residential developments called Stock Ranch. Zone 1 (NORTH) consists of the landscaping along Auburn Boulevard between San Tomas Drive and Raintree Drive (north side of the street and within the medians) and the open space north of Arcade Creek. Zone 2 (SOUTH) consists of the open space on the south side of Arcade Creek and along the north side of Stock Ranch Road.

Assessment District 03-01 (Zone 3), first created in 2020, is for the maintenance of certain areas within and adjacent to the Mitchell Farms Subdivision development. All improvements are on public property. Zone 3 provides for the maintenance of a large open space area (Lot A) along Arcade Creek located in the center of the development (soon to be dedicated to the Sunrise Recreation and Parks District upon completion) and the landscaping within roundabout and three approach islands on Arcadia Drive.

ITEM 15
4 ITEM 15
5 ITEM 15
6 ITEM 15
7 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-01

GENERAL
Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) 98-01, first created in 1998, is located along the west side of Stock Ranch Road north of the Stock Ranch Road / Fountain Square Drive intersection. This LMAD provides for the maintenance of certain areas in and adjacent to Units 1 & 2 of the Stock Village subdivision. There are 133 parcels within this district, whose boundaries are more particularly described on the Assessment Diagram contained in Figure 1.1.

Specific features maintained along the western boundary of the subdivision include, a large group of mature oak trees, the west surface of the sound wall along that edge (but not the structural aspects of the wall) and the tree well areas on the west side of the sound wall. Initially the LMAD was responsible for maintaining 42 large Live and Blue oaks, however, through storm damage, disease, and age; that number has been reduced to 16. The City is committed to ensuring the health and viability of the remaining trees as well as the safety of the nearby residents. Therefore, the trees are regularly inspected by an arborist who specializes in oak tree care and maintenance (i.e. removal, pruning and/or cabling) is performed as recommended.

On the eastern boundary of the development, the LMAD maintains landscaping and irrigation in two planter areas adjacent to Stock Ranch Road (Parcels A and B) and the surface and structural aspects of the sound wall along the residential parcels abutting the two planter areas. The City is committed to the appearance of the development through proper maintenance of the plantings as well as periodic replacement of the plant materials. Additionally, the City also focuses on immediate abatement of graffiti on walls and other public structures.

City performs/manages the maintenance for the LMAD using its own forces or those of contract providers. Figure 1.2 describes the maintenance specifications for the district.

It is understood that should the assessment district be dissolved or not generate enough funds to provide the amount of maintenance described herein, the City may reduce the level of maintenance and reduce or discontinue the repair of the improvements on parcels A and B. Additionally, the City shall then have no obligation to maintain the oak trees and sound wall on the west side of the subdivision. The individual property owners could perform the work on the west edge of the subdivision. The individual property owners would not be a beneficiary of the access easement along the west edge of the subdivision.

ITEM 15
8 DISTRICT FINANCING/METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
As a condition of approval, the developer of the single family Stock Village Unit No. 1 and Unit No. 2 subdivision was required to establish a funding source to provide for ongoing maintenance to the re-vegetation planting and the sound walls and the frontage landscaping and irrigation. The funding for the District is from annual assessments levied on properties within the assessment boundary (Figure 1.1) pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Because each of the single-family lots within the District was created as a result of compliance with this condition, each lot benefits in the same proportion. Therefore, the assessment costs are allocated on a per parcel basis for all Assessment Diagram parcels located in the Assessment District that could qualify as a buildable single-family parcel per the current City of Citrus Heights Zoning Ordinances. The original annual assessment adopted for District 98-01 upon formation in 1998 was $158.00 per parcel.

The formation of this district also included a cost-of-living adjustment provision. Should the cost of landscape maintenance activities and utilities rise, this provision allows for the City of Citrus Heights to increase the annual assessment. Each annual increase, if any, that exceeds the amount assessed to the property owners for the prior years shall not exceed the cost-of-living increase based on the Bay Area Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers.

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
Initially LMAD 98-01 was fully funded by its assessments and accumulated operating reserves in excess of those needed to address unforeseen tree and soundwall maintenance needs. As a result, in Fiscal Year 2004-2005 the annual assessment was reduced from $158 to $80. Over time this reduced assessment rate permitted the District to gradually draw down the excessive operating reserve balance to an appropriate level. However, in recent years continued increases in the costs of regular maintenance activities and utilities have resulted in the reserves being depleted below the level needed to provide for unscheduled maintenance expenditures (i.e. wall repairs, oak tree trimming and electrical system repairs). As a result, in FY 2023/2024, the City of Citrus Heights, for the first time, utilized the cost-of-living increase provision and increased the annual assessment by 3%.

An adjustment in the annual assessment per parcel is proposed for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.

As shown in Figure 1.3. “Summary Analysis”, the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 annual assessments for District 98-01 are proposed to increase by 3% to approximately $91.80 per residential parcel, over the rates for FY 2025/2026. These additional revenues are necessary to support the District’s continued maintenance operations and preserve an appropriate operating reserve to address unforeseen maintenance and repair expenses.

The District’s Assessment Roll is shown in Figure 1.4.

ITEM 15
9 FIGURE 1.1
ITEM 15
10 FIGURE 1.2
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-01

MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATION
West edge of Subdivision
1) Maintain 16 Oak trees. Prune Oak trees once every 5 years or as recommended by an arborist. Supply material and apply insect and disease control chemicals to trees and shrubs. Irrigate Oak trees as necessary. Clean debris from around trees once per year.

Annual Oak tree inspection and associated report.
2) Maintain west sound wall. Clean all graffiti from west surface of wall once every three months, if required.

East edge of Subdivision
1) Maintain trees and other plantings along east frontage of the subdivision, a minimum of once every two weeks. Maintain irrigation system, weekly. Weed area a minimum of once every two weeks. Fertilize area a minimum of twice per year. Control infestation of fungus, diseases and/or insects. This item includes irrigation repair and replanting as needed.
2) Maintain east sound wall. Clean all graffiti from east surface of wall once every three months, if required.

ITEM 15
11 FIGURE 1.3
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-01
28355289; County DL 0273
DESCRIPTION FY 25/26**
ACTUAL
FY 26/27

PROPOSED
BUDGET
ASSESSMENT RATES:

Rate Per Parcel $ 89.14 $ 91.80
Total Number of Parcels 133 133
Total Special Assessments $ 11,286.38 $ 12,209.40
REVENUE:

Interest on Fund Balance $ 3,171.64 $ -
Special Assessments $ 11,680.63 $ 12,209.40
Total Revenues: 14,852.27 $ $ 12,209.40
EXPENDITURES:

Advertising $ - $ 620.00
Materials and Supplies (bark) $ 3,668.89 $ -
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 493.10 $ 303.00
Utilities - Water $ 2,097.01 $ 2,026.00
Professional Services $ - $ 500.00
Contract - Landscape Maintenance Services $ 5,688.00 $ 9,004.00 Contract - Tree Maintenance Services $ 11,583.00
Contract - Construction, Repairs & Extra Work $ 268.00 $ - Cost Allocation (Overhead) $ 3,252.74 $ -
Total Expenditures: $ 27,050.74 $ 12,453.00
$ (12,198.47) $ (243.60)
Transfer to/from Operating Reserve $ 12,198.47 $ 243.60 $ - $ -

OPERATING RESERVE
Beginning Fund Balance (July 1st) $ 138,627.00 $ 126,428.53 Operating Reserve Set-a-side $ - $ -
Transfer from (to) Annual Operating Balance $ (12,198.47) $ (243.60) Ending Operating Reserve Balance (June 30th) $ 126,428.53 $ 126,184.93 **
$xx.xx
Annual Operating Balance
Annual Ending Balance
Recorded actual expenses for the first 3 quarters of the current Fiscal Year plus projection for the 4th quarter.

Audited Fund Balance from previous Fiscal Year
ITEM 15
12 FIGURE 1.4
Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
243 0570 001 0000 1 $ 91.80
243 0570 002 0000 2 $ 91.80
243 0570 003 0000 3 $ 91.80
243 0570 004 0000 4 $ 91.80
243 0570 005 0000 5 $ 91.80
243 0570 006 0000 6 $ 91.80
243 0570 007 0000 7 $ 91.80
243 0570 008 0000 8 $ 91.80
243 0570 009 0000 9 $ 91.80
243 0570 010 0000 10 $ 91.80
243 0570 011 0000 11 $ 91.80
243 0570 012 0000 12 $ 91.80
243 0570 013 0000 13 $ 91.80
243 0570 014 0000 14 $ 91.80
243 0570 015 0000 15 $ 91.80
243 0570 016 0000 16 $ 91.80
243 0570 017 0000 17 $ 91.80
243 0570 018 0000 18 $ 91.80
243 0570 019 0000 19 $ 91.80
243 0570 020 0000 20 $ 91.80
243 0570 021 0000 21 $ 91.80
243 0570 022 0000 22 $ 91.80
243 0570 023 0000 23 $ 91.80
243 0570 024 0000 24 $ 91.80
243 0570 025 0000 25 $ 91.80
243 0570 026 0000 26 $ 91.80
243 0570 027 0000 27 $ 91.80
243 0570 028 0000 28 $ 91.80
243 0570 029 0000 29 $ 91.80
243 0570 030 0000 30 $ 91.80
243 0570 031 0000 31 $ 91.80
243 0570 032 0000 32 $ 91.80
243 0570 033 0000 33 $ 91.80
243 0570 034 0000 34 $ 91.80
243 0570 035 0000 35 $ 91.80
243 0570 036 0000 36 $ 91.80
243 0570 037 0000 37 $ 91.80
243 0570 038 0000 38 $ 91.80
243 0570 039 0000 39 $ 91.80
243 0570 040 0000 40 $ 91.80
243 0570 041 0000 41 $ 91.80
243 0570 042 0000 42 $ 91.80
243 0570 043 0000 43 $ 91.80
243 0570 044 0000 44 $ 91.80
243 0570 045 0000 45 $ 91.80
243 0570 046 0000 46 $ 91.80
243 0570 047 0000 47 $ 91.80
243 0570 048 0000 48 $ 91.80
Subtotal = $ 4,406.40
Tax Assessor's Number
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-01 for STOCK VILLAGE UNITS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 ITEM 15
13 Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
243 0570 049 0000 49 $ 91.80
243 0570 050 0000 50 $ 91.80
243 0570 051 0000 51 $ 91.80
243 0570 052 0000 52 $ 91.80
243 0570 053 0000 53 $ 91.80
243 0570 054 0000 54 $ 91.80
243 0570 055 0000 55 $ 91.80
243 0570 056 0000 56 $ 91.80
243 0570 057 0000 57 $ 91.80
243 0570 058 0000 58 $ 91.80
243 0570 059 0000 59 $ 91.80
243 0570 060 0000 60 $ 91.80
243 0570 061 0000 61 $ 91.80
243 0570 062 0000 62 $ 91.80
243 0570 063 0000 63 $ 91.80
243 0570 064 0000 64 $ 91.80
243 0570 065 0000 65 $ 91.80
243 0570 066 0000 66 $ 91.80
243 0570 067 0000 67 $ 91.80
243 0570 068 0000 68 $ 91.80
243 0570 069 0000 69 $ 91.80
243 0570 070 0000 70 $ 91.80
243 0570 071 0000 71 $ 91.80
243 0570 072 0000 72 $ 91.80
243 0570 073 0000 73 $ 91.80
243 0570 074 0000 74 $ 91.80
243 0570 075 0000 75 $ 91.80
243 0570 076 0000 76 $ 91.80
243 0570 077 0000 77 $ 91.80
243 0570 078 0000 78 $ 91.80
243 0570 079 0000 79 $ 91.80
243 0570 080 0000 80 $ 91.80
243 0580 001 0000 81 $ 91.80
243 0580 002 0000 82 $ 91.80
243 0580 003 0000 83 $ 91.80
243 0580 004 0000 84 $ 91.80
243 0580 005 0000 85 $ 91.80
243 0580 006 0000 86 $ 91.80
243 0580 007 0000 87 $ 91.80
243 0580 008 0000 88 $ 91.80
243 0580 009 0000 89 $ 91.80
243 0580 010 0000 90 $ 91.80
243 0580 011 0000 91 $ 91.80
243 0580 012 0000 92 $ 91.80
243 0580 013 0000 93 $ 91.80
243 0580 014 0000 94 $ 91.80
243 0580 015 0000 95 $ 91.80
243 0580 016 0000 96 $ 91.80
Subtotal = $ 4,406.40
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-01 for STOCK VILLAGE UNITS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 Tax Assessor's Number
ITEM 15
14 Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
243 0580 017 0000 97 $ 91.80
243 0580 018 0000 98 $ 91.80
243 0580 019 0000 99 $ 91.80
243 0580 026 0000 105 $ 91.80
243 0580 027 0000 106 $ 91.80
243 0580 028 0000 107 $ 91.80
243 0580 029 0000 108 $ 91.80
243 0580 030 0000 109 $ 91.80
243 0580 031 0000 110 $ 91.80
243 0580 032 0000 111 $ 91.80
243 0580 033 0000 112 $ 91.80
243 0580 034 0000 113 $ 91.80
243 0580 035 0000 114 $ 91.80
243 0580 036 0000 115 $ 91.80
243 0580 037 0000 116 $ 91.80
243 0580 038 0000 117 $ 91.80
243 0580 039 0000 118 $ 91.80
243 0580 040 0000 119 $ 91.80
243 0580 041 0000 120 $ 91.80
243 0580 042 0000 121 $ 91.80
243 0580 043 0000 122 $ 91.80
243 0580 044 0000 123 $ 91.80
243 0580 045 0000 124 $ 91.80
243 0580 046 0000 125 $ 91.80
243 0580 047 0000 126 $ 91.80
243 0580 048 0000 127 $ 91.80
243 0580 049 0000 128 $ 91.80
243 0580 050 0000 129 $ 91.80
243 0580 051 0000 130 $ 91.80
243 0580 052 0000 131 $ 91.80
243 0580 053 0000 132 $ 91.80
243 0580 054 0000 133 $ 91.80
243 0580 056 0000 100 $ 91.80
243 0580 057 0000 101 $ 91.80
243 0580 058 0000 102 $ 91.80
243 0580 059 0000 103 $ 91.80
243 0580 060 0000 104 $ 91.80
Subtotal = $ 3,396.60
133 Parcels; Total 98-01 Assessments is $ 12,209.40
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-01 for STOCK VILLAGE UNITS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 Tax Assessor's Number
ITEM 15
15 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 – Zone 1 (Sorensen Ranch)

GENERAL
Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) 98-02, Zone 1 (Sorensen Ranch), first created in 1998, is located west of Van Maren Lane and north of Oak Lakes Lane. This LMAD provides for the maintenance of certain areas within and adjacent to Unit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the Sorensen Ranch development. There are 222 parcels in this district, whose boundaries are more particularly described on the Assessment Diagram contained in Figure 2.1.

All improvements are on public property. The improved parcels to be maintained are along the west side of Van Maren Lane (approximately 1500 feet); along the north side of Oak Lakes Lane (approximately 1300 feet); and shorter parcels along Campfire Way at Van Maren Lane (approximately 100 feet on the south side); Horseman Way at Van Maren Lane (approximately 100 feet on the north and south side); and the east side of Silversaddle Way at Oak Lakes Lane (approximately 100 feet).

The improvements to be maintained include 81 Oak trees and various conifer trees and accent trees. Shrubs, groundcover, lawn planting, irrigation, sound walls, sign walls with lighting, planters and mow strips are also included. The City is committed to the appearance of the development through proper maintenance of the plantings as well as periodic replacement of the plant materials.

Additionally, the City also focuses on immediate abatement of graffiti on walls and other public structures.

The City performs/manages the maintenance for the LMAD using its own forces or those of contract providers. Figure 2.2 describes the maintenance specifications for the district.

DISTRICT FINANCING/METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
As a condition of approval, the developer of the single-family Sorensen Ranch Unit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 subdivisions was required to establish a funding source to provide for ongoing maintenance of the re-vegetation planting and the sound walls and the frontage landscaping and irrigation.

Funding for the LMAD 98-02, Zone 1 is from annual assessments levied on properties within the assessment boundary (Figure 2.1) pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Because each of the single-family lots within the District was created as a result of compliance with this condition, each lot benefits in the same proportion. Therefore, the assessment costs are allocated on a per parcel basis for all Assessment Diagram parcels located in the Assessment District that could qualify as a buildable single-family parcel per the current City of Citrus Heights Zoning Ordinances. The original annual assessment adopted for District 98-02, Zone 1 upon formation in 1998 was $200.00 per parcel.

ITEM 15
16 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
Initially LMAD 98-02, Zone 1, was fully funded by its assessments and accumulated operating reserves in excess of those needed to address unforeseen maintenance/repair needs. As a result, in Fiscal Year 2003-2004 the annual assessment was reduced from $200 to $100. Over time this reduced assessment rate permitted the District to gradually draw down the excessive operating reserve balance to an appropriate level. However, in recent years continued increases in the costs of regular maintenance activities and utilities have resulted in the reserves being depleted below the level needed to provide for unscheduled maintenance expenditures (i.e. soundwall repairs, oak tree trimming and irrigation/electrical system repairs). As a result, in FY 2023/2024, the City of Citrus Heights, for the first time, utilized the cost-of-living increase provision and increased the annual assessment by 3%.

An adjustment in the annual assessment per parcel is proposed for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.

As shown in Figure 2.3. “Summary Analysis”, the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 annual assessments for District 98-02, Zone 1, are proposed to increase by 3% over the rates for FY 2025/2026, to approximately $114.78 per residential parcel. These additional revenues are necessary to support the District’s continued maintenance operations and preserve an appropriate operating reserve to address unforeseen maintenance and repair expenses.

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION OF AREA TO BE MAINTAINED
All that real property situated in the City of Citrus Heights, County of Sacramento, State of California, which is further described as follows:

Parcel 1, Parcel 2, and Parcel 3 as shown on that certain parcel map entitled “A Portion of the Southwest One-Quarter of Section 27, Township 10 North, Range 6 East, M.D.M.”, filed for record in the office of the Recorder of Sacramento County, on May 28, 1998, in Book 151 of Parcel Maps, at Page 3, and more particularly described on the Assessment Diagram contained in Figure 2.1.

The District’s Assessment Roll is contained in Figure 2.4.

ITEM 15
17 FIGURE 2.1
ITEM 15
18 FIGURE 2.2
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-02
Zone 1 (Sorensen Ranch)

MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATION
East and South edge of Subdivision
1) Maintain 81 Oak (mitigation requirement), and various conifer and accent trees. Prune Oak trees once every 5 years. Supply material and apply insect and disease control chemicals to trees and shrubs. Annual Oak tree inspection and associated report. 2) Maintain sound wall. Clean all graffiti from street side of wall as needed. Perform structural repairs/replacement as needed.
3) Maintain trees, turf and other plantings along frontage of the subdivision, a minimum of once every two weeks. Maintain irrigation system, weekly. Weed area a minimum of once every two weeks. Fertilize area a minimum of twice per year. Control infestation of fungus, diseases and/or insects. This item includes irrigation repair and replanting as needed.

ITEM 15
19 FIGURE 2.3
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 ZONE 1
28455289; County DL 0275
FY 25/26**
ACTUAL
FY 26/27

PROPOSED
BUDGET
ASSESSMENT RATES:

Rate Per Parcel $ 111.44 $ 114.78
Total Number of Parcels 222 222
Total Special Assessments $ 24,739.68 $ 25,481.16

REVENUE
Interest on Fund Balance $ 1,148.87 $ -
Special Assessments $ 24,328.39 $ 25,481.16
Total Sources of Funds: $ 25,477.26 $ 25,481.16

EXPENDITURES
Advertising & Mail $ - $ 425.00
Utilities $ 11,092.91 $ 11,200.00
Professional Services $ -
Contract - Landscape Maintenance $ 6,288.00 $ 7,500.00
Contract - Construction, Repairs & Extra Work $ 615.50 $ 2,500.00 Contract - Tree Maintenance Services $ -
Contract - Materials & Supplies $ - $ -
Cost Allocation (Overhead) $ 9,913.75 $ -
Total Expenditures: $ 27,910.16 $ 21,625.00
$ (2,432.90) $ 3,856.16
Transfer to/from Operating Reserve $ 2,432.90 $ (3,856.16) $ - $ -

OPERATING RESERVE
Beginning Fund Balance (July 1st) $ 57,795.00 $ 55,362.10 Operating Reserve Set-a-side $ - $ -
Transfer from (to) Annual Operating Balance $ (2,432.90) $ 3,856.16 Ending Operating Reserve Balance (June 30th) $ 55,362.10 $ 59,218.26 **
$xx.xx Audited Fund Balance from previous Fiscal Year

DESCRIPTION
Annual Operating Balance
Annual Ending Balance
Recorded actual expenses for the first 3 quarters of the current Fiscal Year plus projection for the 4th quarter.

ITEM 15
20 Figure 2.4
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 ZONE 1 for
SORENSON RANCH UNITS NO. 1, 2, 3 and 4
UNIT 1
Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
211 0830 001 0000 11 $ 114.78 211 0830 038 0000 110 $ 114.78 211 0830 002 0000 12 $ 114.78 211 0830 039 0000 111 $ 114.78 211 0830 003 0000 13 $ 114.78 211 0830 040 0000 149 $ 114.78 211 0830 004 0000 14 $ 114.78 211 0830 041 0000 150 $ 114.78 211 0830 005 0000 15 $ 114.78 211 0830 042 0000 151 $ 114.78 211 0830 006 0000 16 $ 114.78 211 0830 043 0000 152 $ 114.78 211 0830 007 0000 17 $ 114.78 211 0830 044 0000 153 $ 114.78 211 0830 008 0000 18 $ 114.78 211 0830 045 0000 154 $ 114.78 211 0830 009 0000 19 $ 114.78 211 0830 046 0000 155 $ 114.78 211 0830 010 0000 20 $ 114.78 211 0830 047 0000 156 $ 114.78 211 0830 011 0000 21 $ 114.78 211 0830 048 0000 157 $ 114.78 211 0830 012 0000 22 $ 114.78 211 0830 049 0000 158 $ 114.78 211 0830 013 0000 23 $ 114.78 211 0830 050 0000 159 $ 114.78 211 0830 014 0000 86 $ 114.78 211 0830 051 0000 160 $ 114.78 211 0830 015 0000 87 $ 114.78 211 0830 052 0000 161 $ 114.78 211 0830 016 0000 88 $ 114.78 211 0830 053 0000 162 $ 114.78 211 0830 017 0000 89 $ 114.78 211 0830 054 0000 163 $ 114.78 211 0830 018 0000 90 $ 114.78 211 0830 055 0000 164 $ 114.78 211 0830 019 0000 91 $ 114.78 211 0830 056 0000 2 $ 114.78 211 0830 020 0000 92 $ 114.78 211 0830 057 0000 3 $ 114.78 211 0830 021 0000 93 $ 114.78 211 0830 058 0000 4 $ 114.78 211 0830 022 0000 94 $ 114.78 211 0830 059 0000 5 $ 114.78 211 0830 023 0000 95 $ 114.78 211 0830 060 0000 6 $ 114.78 211 0830 024 0000 96 $ 114.78 211 0830 061 0000 7 $ 114.78 211 0830 025 0000 97 $ 114.78 211 0830 062 0000 8 $ 114.78 211 0830 026 0000 98 $ 114.78 211 0830 063 0000 9 $ 114.78 211 0830 027 0000 99 $ 114.78 211 0830 064 0000 10 $ 114.78 211 0830 028 0000 100 $ 114.78 Subtotal = $ 3,099.06
211 0830 029 0000 101 $ 114.78
211 0830 030 0000 102 $ 114.78
211 0830 031 0000 103 $ 114.78
211 0830 032 0000 104 $ 114.78
211 0830 033 0000 105 $ 114.78
211 0830 034 0000 106 $ 114.78
211 0830 035 0000 107 $ 114.78
211 0830 036 0000 108 $ 114.78
211 0830 037 0000 109 $ 114.78
Subtotal = $ 4,246.86
Tax Assessor's Number Tax Assessor's Number
ITEM 15
21 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 ZONE 1 for
SORENSON RANCH UNITS NO. 1, 2, 3 and 4
UNIT 2
Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
211 0830 067 0000 24 $ 114.78 211 0830 105 0000 113 $ 114.78 211 0830 068 0000 25 $ 114.78 211 0830 106 0000 114 $ 114.78 211 0830 069 0000 26 $ 114.78 211 0830 107 0000 115 $ 114.78 211 0830 070 0000 27 $ 114.78 211 0830 108 0000 116 $ 114.78 211 0830 071 0000 28 $ 114.78 211 0830 109 0000 117 $ 114.78 211 0830 072 0000 29 $ 114.78 211 0830 110 0000 118 $ 114.78 211 0830 073 0000 30 $ 114.78 211 0830 111 0000 119 $ 114.78 211 0830 074 0000 31 $ 114.78 211 0830 112 0000 120 $ 114.78 211 0830 075 0000 32 $ 114.78 211 0830 113 0000 122 $ 114.78 211 0830 076 0000 33 $ 114.78 211 0830 114 0000 123 $ 114.78 211 0830 077 0000 34 $ 114.78 211 0830 115 0000 145 $ 114.78 211 0830 078 0000 35 $ 114.78 211 0830 116 0000 181 $ 114.78 211 0830 079 0000 36 $ 114.78 211 0830 117 0000 180 $ 114.78 211 0830 080 0000 37 $ 114.78 211 0830 118 0000 148 $ 114.78 211 0830 081 0000 38 $ 114.78 211 0830 119 0000 147 $ 114.78 211 0830 082 0000 39 $ 114.78 211 0830 120 0000 146 $ 114.78 211 0830 083 0000 40 $ 114.78 Subtotal = $ 1,836.48
211 0830 084 0000 41 $ 114.78
211 0830 085 0000 42 $ 114.78
211 0830 086 0000 43 $ 114.78
211 0830 087 0000 44 $ 114.78
211 0830 088 0000 45 $ 114.78
211 0830 089 0000 71 $ 114.78
211 0830 090 0000 72 $ 114.78
211 0830 091 0000 73 $ 114.78
211 0830 092 0000 74 $ 114.78
211 0830 093 0000 75 $ 114.78
211 0830 094 0000 76 $ 114.78
211 0830 095 0000 77 $ 114.78
211 0830 096 0000 78 $ 114.78
211 0830 097 0000 79 $ 114.78
211 0830 098 0000 80 $ 114.78
211 0830 099 0000 81 $ 114.78
211 0830 100 0000 82 $ 114.78
211 0830 101 0000 83 $ 114.78
211 0830 102 0000 84 $ 114.78
211 0830 103 0000 85 $ 114.78
211 0830 104 0000 112 $ 114.78
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 ZONE 1 for SORENSON RANCH
UNITS NO. 1, 2, 3 and 4
Tax Assessor's Number
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 ZONE 1 for SORENSON RANCH
UNITS NO. 1, 2, 3 and 4
Tax Assessor's Number
ITEM 15
22 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 ZONE 1 for
SORENSON RANCH UNITS NO. 1, 2, 3 and 4
UNIT 3
Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
211 0840 048 0000 221 $ 114.78 211 0840 084 0000 63 $ 114.78 211 0840 049 0000 222 $ 114.78 211 0840 085 0000 64 $ 114.78 211 0840 050 0000 193 $ 114.78 211 0840 086 0000 65 $ 114.78 211 0840 051 0000 194 $ 114.78 211 0840 087 0000 66 $ 114.78 211 0840 052 0000 187 $ 114.78 211 0840 088 0000 67 $ 114.78 211 0840 053 0000 188 $ 114.78 211 0840 089 0000 68 $ 114.78 211 0840 054 0000 189 $ 114.78 211 0840 090 0000 69 $ 114.78 211 0840 055 0000 190 $ 114.78 211 0840 091 0000 70 $ 114.78 211 0840 056 0000 191 $ 114.78 211 0840 092 0000 46 $ 114.78 211 0840 057 0000 192 $ 114.78 211 0840 093 0000 47 $ 114.78 211 0840 058 0000 133 $ 114.78 211 0840 094 0000 48 $ 114.78 211 0840 059 0000 134 $ 114.78 211 0840 095 0000 49 $ 114.78 211 0840 060 0000 135 $ 114.78 211 0840 096 0000 50 $ 114.78 211 0840 061 0000 136 $ 114.78 211 0840 097 0000 51 $ 114.78 211 0840 062 0000 137 $ 114.78 211 0840 098 0000 52 $ 114.78 211 0840 063 0000 138 $ 114.78 211 0840 099 0000 53 $ 114.78 211 0840 064 0000 139 $ 114.78 211 0840 100 0000 54 $ 114.78 211 0840 065 0000 140 $ 114.78 211 0840 101 0000 55 $ 114.78 211 0840 066 0000 141 $ 114.78 211 0840 102 0000 56 $ 114.78 211 0840 067 0000 142 $ 114.78 211 0840 103 0000 57 $ 114.78 211 0840 068 0000 143 $ 114.78 211 0840 104 0000 58 $ 114.78 211 0840 069 0000 144 $ 114.78 Subtotal = $ 2,410.38
211 0840 070 0000 123 $ 114.78
211 0840 071 0000 124 $ 114.78
211 0840 072 0000 125 $ 114.78
211 0840 073 0000 126 $ 114.78
211 0840 074 0000 127 $ 114.78
211 0840 075 0000 128 $ 114.78
211 0840 076 0000 129 $ 114.78
211 0840 077 0000 130 $ 114.78
211 0840 078 0000 131 $ 114.78
211 0840 079 0000 132 $ 114.78
211 0840 080 0000 59 $ 114.78
211 0840 081 0000 60 $ 114.78
211 0840 082 0000 61 $ 114.78
211 0840 083 0000 62 $ 114.78
Subtotal = $ 4,132.08
Tax Assessor's Number Tax Assessor's Number
ITEM 15
23 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 ZONE 1 for
SORENSON RANCH UNITS NO. 1, 2, 3 and 4
UNIT 4
Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
211 0840 001 0000 165 $ 114.78 211 0840 027 0000 201 $ 114.78 211 0840 002 0000 166 $ 114.78 211 0840 028 0000 202 $ 114.78 211 0840 003 0000 167 $ 114.78 211 0840 029 0000 203 $ 114.78 211 0840 004 0000 168 $ 114.78 211 0840 030 0000 204 $ 114.78 211 0840 005 0000 169 $ 114.78 211 0840 031 0000 205 $ 114.78 211 0840 006 0000 170 $ 114.78 211 0840 032 0000 206 $ 114.78 211 0840 007 0000 171 $ 114.78 211 0840 033 0000 207 $ 114.78 211 0840 008 0000 172 $ 114.78 211 0840 034 0000 208 $ 114.78 211 0840 009 0000 173 $ 114.78 211 0840 035 0000 209 $ 114.78 211 0840 010 0000 174 $ 114.78 211 0840 036 0000 210 $ 114.78 211 0840 011 0000 175 $ 114.78 211 0840 037 0000 211 $ 114.78 211 0840 012 0000 176 $ 114.78 211 0840 038 0000 212 $ 114.78 211 0840 013 0000 177 $ 114.78 211 0840 039 0000 213 $ 114.78 211 0840 014 0000 178 $ 114.78 211 0840 040 0000 214 $ 114.78 211 0840 015 0000 179 $ 114.78 211 0840 041 0000 215 $ 114.78 211 0840 016 0000 182 $ 114.78 211 0840 042 0000 216 $ 114.78 211 0840 017 0000 183 $ 114.78 211 0840 043 0000 217 $ 114.78 211 0840 018 0000 184 $ 114.78 211 0840 044 0000 218 $ 114.78 211 0840 019 0000 185 $ 114.78 211 0840 045 0000 219 $ 114.78 211 0840 020 0000 186 $ 114.78 211 0840 046 0000 220 $ 114.78 211 0840 021 0000 195 $ 114.78 211 0840 047 0000 1 $ 114.78 211 0840 022 0000 196 $ 114.78 Subtotal = $ 2,410.38
211 0840 023 0000 197 $ 114.78
211 0840 024 0000 198 $ 114.78
211 0840 025 0000 199 $ 114.78
211 0840 026 0000 200 $ 114.78
Subtotal = $ 2,984.28
222 Parcels; Total 98-02 Zone 1 Assessments is $ 25,481.16 Tax Assessor's Number Tax Assessor's Number
ITEM 15
24 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 – Zone 2 (Autumnwood Subdivision)

GENERAL
Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) 98-02, Zone 2 (Autumnwood Subdivision), first created in 2014, is located south side of Antelope Road and west of Amsterdam Avenue. This LMAD provides for the maintenance of certain areas within and adjacent to the Autumnwood subdivision development. All improvements are on public property. There are 46 residential parcels in this district, whose boundaries are more particularly described in the Assessment Diagram contained in Figure 3.1.

Zone 2 consists of forty-six (46) residential lots and seven (7) lots used for landscaping, pedestrian pathways, and drainage detention basins.

Development of the property was conditioned upon establishing a funding source to provide for ongoing maintenance of landscaping, open space, pedestrian/bike trails, masonry walls, drainage detention basins and related appurtenances.

The facilities in Zone 2 include landscaping south of Antelope Road (Lots E and along the frontage of 7106 Antelope Road) and also within the subdivision (Lots A, B, C, D, F, and H). On-going maintenance of the landscaped areas require routine care of trees, shrubs, and groundcover, including weed control, fertilization, mulch replacement, and litter removal. The pedestrian pathways require routine maintenance, including surface and structural maintenance, and graffiti abatement.

The facilities in Zone 2 also include masonry walls on the North and East sides of the subdivision located within Lots A, B, C, E, and the frontage along 7106 Antelope Road. The walls require routine maintenance, including surface and structural maintenance, and graffiti abatement.

The walls and landscaping within the City’s Right-of-Way along the frontage of 7106 Antelope Road (APN: 204-0193-027-0000) as dedicated by separate instrument (County of Sacramento Book 20140715, Page 0721) is also included as areas to be maintained in LMAD 98-02, Zone 2.

The facilities in Zone 2 also include a drainage detention basin located in the northwest corner of the property in Lot D and a drainage detention basin located in the southeast corner of the property in Lot F. The drainage detention basins and appurtenances require routine maintenance including surface and structural maintenance, graffiti abatement, landscape maintenance, and litter removal.

Additionally, the facilities in Zone 2 include a pedestrian trail for circulation (Lots D, F, and H).

The trail will require routine maintenance and replacement.

Figure 3.2 contains a detailed listing of items to be maintained and/or replacement of each of the items. City performs/manages the maintenance for the LMAD using its own forces or those of contract providers.

ITEM 15
25 DISTRICT FINANCING/METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
As a condition of approval, the developer of the single family Autumnwood subdivision was required to establish a funding source to provide for ongoing maintenance of the landscaping, irrigation, detention basins, pedestrian pathways, and masonry walls located within Lots A, B, C, E, and the frontage along 7106 Antelope Road. Funding for the LMAD 98-02, Zone 2 is from annual assessments levied on properties within the assessment boundary (Figure 3.1) pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Because each of the single-family lots within the District was created as a result of compliance with this condition, each lot benefits in the same proportion. Therefore, the assessment costs are allocated on a per parcel basis for all Assessment Diagram parcels located in the Assessment District that could qualify as a buildable single-family parcel per the current City of Citrus Heights Zoning Ordinances. The original annual assessment adopted for District 98-02, Zone 2 upon formation in 2014 was $354.09 per parcel.

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
In recent years continued increases in the costs of regular maintenance activities and utilities have resulted in LMAD 98-02, Zone 2’s operating reserves being depleted below the level needed to provide for unscheduled maintenance expenditures (i.e. soundwall repairs, oak tree trimming and irrigation/electrical system repairs). As a result, in FY 2023/2024, the City of Citrus Heights, for the first time, utilized the cost-of-living increase provision and increased the annual assessment by 3%.

An adjustment in the annual assessment per parcel is proposed for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.

As shown in Figure 3.3. “Summary Analysis”, the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 annual assessments for District 98-02, Zone 2, are proposed to again increase by 3% (less than the maximum allowable 4%) over the rates for FY 2025/2026, to approximately $406.44 per residential parcel. These additional revenues are necessary to support the District’s continued maintenance operations and preserve an appropriate operating reserve to address unforeseen maintenance and repair expenses.

The district’s Assessment Roll is contained in Figure 3.4.

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION OF AREA TO BE MAINTAINED
All that real property situated in the City of Citrus Heights, County of Sacramento, State of California, which is further described as follows:

Lots A, B, C, D, E, F, and H of the Autumnwood Subdivision and also including the frontage along 7106 Antelope Road; more particularly described on the Assessment Diagram contained in Figure

3.1. ITEM 15
26 FIGURE 3.1

ITEM 15
27 FIGURE 3.2
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-02
Zone 2 (Autumnwood Subdivision)

MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATION
1) Maintain trees and other plantings along frontage of the subdivision along Antelope Road (Lot E) and Live Oak Way (Lots A-C) a minimum of once every two weeks. Maintain irrigation system, weekly. Weed area a minimum of once every two weeks. Fertilize area a minimum of twice per year. Control infestation of fungus, diseases and/or insects. This item includes irrigation repair, landscaping materials (wood chips, chemicals, etc.), and replanting as needed.
2) Maintain trees and other plantings within the detention basins (Lots D and F) 3) Maintain masonry walls (Lots A-F). Clean all graffiti from street side of wall as needed.

Perform structural repairs/replacement as needed.
4) Maintain pedestrian pathways (Lots D, F, and H). Clean all graffiti as needed. Perform structural repairs/replacement as needed.

ITEM 15
28 FIGURE 3.3
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 ZONE 2
28555289; County DL 0268
FY 25/26**
ACTUAL
FY 26/27

PROPOSED
BUDGET
ASSESSMENT RATES:

Rate Per Parcel $ 394.62 $ 406.44
Total Number of Parcels 46 46
Total Special Assessments $ 18,152.52 $ 18,696.24
REVENUE:

Interest on Fund Balance $ 1,090.67 $ -
Special Assessments $ 18,086.48 $ 18,696.24
Total Revenue: 19,177.15 $ $ 18,696.24
EXPENDITURES:

Advertising & Mail $ - $ 425.00
Utilities $ 2,369.01 $ 3,600.00
Professional Services $ - $ -
Contract - Landscape Maintenance $ 6,888.00 $ 7,400.00
Contract - Construction, Repairs & Extra Work $ - $ -
Contract - Materials & Supplies $ - $ -
Cost Allocation (Overhead) $ 3,437.11 $ -
Total Expenditures: $ 12,694.12 $ 11,425.00
$ 6,483.03 $ 7,271.24
Transfer to/from Operating Reserve $ (6,483.03) $ (7,271.24) $ - $ -

OPERATING RESERVE
Beginning Fund Balance (July 1st) $ 44,321.00 $ 50,804.03 Operating Reserve Set-a-side $ - $ -
Transfer from (to) Annual Operating Balance $ 6,483.03 $ 7,271.24 Ending Operating Reserve Balance (June 30th) $ 50,804.03 $ 58,075.27 **
$xx.xx

DESCRIPTION
Annual Operating Balance
Annual Ending Balance
Recorded actual expenses for the first 3 quarters of the current Fiscal Year plus projection for the 4th quarter.

Audited Fund Balance from previous Fiscal Year
ITEM 15
29 FIGURE 3.4
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 ZONE 2
for AUTUMNWOOD
Tax Assessor's Number
Assessment Diagram
#
Assessment
Amount Tax Assessor's Number Assessment Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
204 0740 001 0000 1 $ 406.44 204 0740 029 0000 29 $ 406.44 204 0740 002 0000 2 $ 406.44 204 0740 030 0000 30 $ 406.44 204 0740 003 0000 3 $ 406.44 204 0740 031 0000 31 $ 406.44 204 0740 004 0000 4 $ 406.44 204 0740 032 0000 32 $ 406.44 204 0740 005 0000 5 $ 406.44 204 0740 033 0000 33 $ 406.44 204 0740 006 0000 6 $ 406.44 204 0740 034 0000 34 $ 406.44 204 0740 007 0000 7 $ 406.44 204 0740 035 0000 35 $ 406.44 204 0740 008 0000 8 $ 406.44 204 0740 036 0000 36 $ 406.44 204 0740 009 0000 9 $ 406.44 204 0740 037 0000 37 $ 406.44 204 0740 010 0000 10 $ 406.44 204 0740 038 0000 38 $ 406.44 204 0740 011 0000 11 $ 406.44 204 0740 039 0000 39 $ 406.44 204 0740 012 0000 12 $ 406.44 204 0740 040 0000 40 $ 406.44 204 0740 013 0000 13 $ 406.44 204 0740 041 0000 41 $ 406.44 204 0740 014 0000 14 $ 406.44 204 0740 042 0000 42 $ 406.44 204 0740 015 0000 15 $ 406.44 204 0740 043 0000 43 $ 406.44 204 0740 016 0000 16 $ 406.44 204 0740 044 0000 44 $ 406.44 204 0740 017 0000 17 $ 406.44 204 0740 045 0000 45 $ 406.44 204 0740 018 0000 18 $ 406.44 204 0740 046 0000 46 $ 406.44 204 0740 019 0000 19 $ 406.44 Subtotal = $ 7,315.92
204 0740 020 0000 20 $ 406.44
204 0740 021 0000 21 $ 406.44
204 0740 022 0000 22 $ 406.44 46 Parcels; Total 98-02 Zone 2 Assessments = $ 18,696.24 204 0740 023 0000 23 $ 406.44
204 0740 024 0000 24 $ 406.44
204 0740 025 0000 25 $ 406.44
204 0740 026 0000 26 $ 406.44
204 0740 027 0000 27 $ 406.44
204 0740 028 0000 28 $ 406.44
Subtotal = $ 11,380.32
ITEM 15
30 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 – Zone 3 (Mariposa Creek Subdivision)

GENERAL
Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) 98-02, Zone 3 (Mariposa Creek Subdivision), first created in 2018, is located north side of Antelope Road at Turner Court. This LMAD provides for the maintenance of certain areas within and adjacent to the Mariposa Creek Subdivision development. All improvements are on public property. There are 15 residential parcels in this district, whose boundaries are more particularly described on the Assessment Diagram contained in Figure 4.1.

Zone 3 consists of fifteen (15) residential parcels and three (3) lots used for landscaping, pedestrian pathways, and creek open space.

Development of the property was conditioned upon establishing a funding source to provide for ongoing maintenance of landscaping, open space, pedestrian/bike pathways, masonry walls, and related appurtenances.

The facilities in Zone 3 include landscaping north of Antelope Road (Lots A and B) and also within the subdivision (Lot C). On-going maintenance of the landscaped areas require routine care of trees, shrubs, and groundcover, including weed control, fertilization, mulch replacement, litter removal, irrigation systems and pathway lighting. The pedestrian pathways require routine maintenance, including surface and structural maintenance, maintenance and repairs of pathway lighting and graffiti abatement.

The facilities in Zone 3 also include masonry walls on the north side of Antelope Road (within Lots A & B of the subdivision) The walls require routine maintenance, including surface and structural maintenance, and graffiti abatement.

The facilities in Zone 3 also include a pedestrian pathway, street paving, storm drain system and retaining walls located in the northwest corner of the development in Lot C. The walls, pedestrian pathways, and various appurtenances require routine maintenance including surface and structural maintenance, graffiti abatement, landscape maintenance, litter removal, and electrical & irrigation repairs.

The facilities in Zone 3 also include a drainage system along the north property line of the subdivision and creek open space along the east side of the development (Lot B). The drainage system & creek open space appurtenances require routine maintenance including structural maintenance, keeping the creek & floodplain area clear of debris and paving maintenance.

Figure 4.2 contains a detailed listing of items to be maintained and/or replacement of each of the items. City performs/manages the maintenance for the LMAD using its own forces or those of contract providers.

ITEM 15
31 DISTRICT FINANCING/METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
As a condition of approval, the developer of the single family Mariposa Creek Subdivision was required to establish a funding source to provide for ongoing maintenance of the landscaping, irrigation, storm drain system, creek open space, pedestrian pathways, and masonry walls located within Lots A, B, and C. Funding for LMAD 98-02, Zone 3 will be from annual assessments levied on residential parcels within the zone’s assessment boundary (Figure 4.1), pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Because each of the single-family lots within the zone was created as a result of compliance with this condition, each lot benefits in the same proportion.

Therefore, the assessment costs are allocated on a per parcel basis for all assessment diagram parcels located in the Assessment District that qualified as a buildable single-family parcel per the current City of Citrus Heights Zoning Ordinances. The original annual assessment adopted for District 98-02, Zone 3 upon formation in 2018 was $753.33 per parcel.

The formation of this district also included a cost of living adjustment provision. Should the cost of landscape maintenance activities and utilities rise, this provision allows for the City of Citrus Heights to increase the annual assessment. Each annual increase, if any, shall not exceed a maximum of four percent 4%.

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
In recent years continued increases in the costs of regular maintenance activities and utilities have resulted in LMAD 98-02 Zone 3’s operating reserves being depleted below the level needed to provide for unscheduled maintenance expenditures (i.e. soundwall repairs and irrigation/electrical system repairs). As a result, in FY 2022/2023, the City of Citrus Heights, for the first time, utilized the cost-of-living increase provision and increased the annual assessment by 3%.

An adjustment in the annual assessment per parcel is proposed for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.

As shown in Figure 4.3. “Summary Analysis”, the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 annual assessments for District 98-02, Zone 3, are proposed to increase by 3% (less than the maximum allowable 4%) over the rates for FY 2025/2026, to approximately $864.78 per residential parcel. These additional revenues are necessary to support the district’s continued maintenance operations and preserve an appropriate operating reserve to address unforeseen maintenance and repair expenses.

The district’s Assessment Roll is contained in Figure 4.4.

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION OF AREA TO BE MAINTAINED
All that real property situated in the City of Citrus Heights, County of Sacramento, State of California, which is further described as follows:

Lots A, B and C of the Mariposa Creek Subdivision; more particularly described on the Assessment Diagram contained in Figure 4.1.

ITEM 15
32 FIGURE 4.1
ITEM 15
33 FIGURE 4.2
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-02
Zone 3 (Mariposa Creek Subdivision)

MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATION
1) Maintain trees and other plantings a minimum of once every two weeks along frontage of the subdivision along Antelope Road (Lots A & B) and the pedestrian pathway within Lot C of subdivision development. Maintain irrigation system, weekly. Weed area a minimum of once every two weeks. Fertilize area a minimum of twice per year. Control infestation of fungus, diseases and/or insects. This item includes irrigation repair, landscaping materials (wood chips, chemicals, etc.), and replanting as needed. 2) Maintain masonry walls (Lots A & B). Clean all graffiti from street-facing side of wall(s) as needed. Perform structural repairs/replacement as needed. 3) Maintain pedestrian pathway (Lot C). Clean all graffiti as needed. Perform structural repairs/replacement as needed. This item includes repair and materials to maintain the light bollards along the pathway.
4) Maintain the creek open space and storm drain system (Lots B & C and along the north property lines of the subdivision development). Keep the existing creek open space free from debris to assure flow of Cripple Creek, repair and maintenance of storm drain system within Lot C and public drainage system along the north property lines of the subdivision development. This item includes any paving repairs and miscellaneous items for the small portion of Orange Drive located within Lot C.

ITEM 15
34 FIGURE 4.3
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 ZONE 3
29255289; County DL0281
DESCRIPTION FY 25/26**
ACTUAL
FY 26/27

PROPOSED
BUDGET
ASSESSMENT RATES:

Rate Per Parcel $ 839.60 $ 864.78
Total Number of Parcels 15 15
Total Special Assessments $ 12,594.00 $ 12,971.70
REVENUE:

Interest on Fund Balance $ 1,131.99 $ -
Special Assessments $ 12,550.90 $ 12,971.70
Total Revenue: 13,682.89 $ $ 12,971.70
EXPENDITURES:

Materials and Supplies $ - $ -
Advertising & Mail $ - $ 450.00
Utilities - Electric $ 200.26 $ 225.00
Utilities - Water $ 737.72 $ 950.00
Professional Services $ - $ -
Contract - Landscape Maintenance $ 4,128.00 $ 5,300.00
Contract - Landscape Repairs/Extra Work $ 3,256.45 $ -
Contract - Tree Maintenance $ 8,712.00 $ -
Cost Allocation* (Overhead) $ - $ -
Total Expenditures: $ 17,034.43 $ 6,925.00
$ (3,351.54) $ 6,046.70
Transfer to/from Operating Reserve $ 3,351.54 $ (6,046.70) $ - $ -

OPERATING RESERVE
Beginning Fund Balance (July 1st) $ 40,728.00 $ 37,376.46 Transfer from (to) Annual Operating Balance $ (3,351.54) $ 6,046.70 Ending Operating Reserve Balance (June 30th) $ 37,376.46 $ 43,423.16 ** Recorded actual expenses for the first 3 quarters fo the current Fiscal Year plus projections for the 4th quarter. $xx.xx Audited Fund Balance from previous Fiscal Year
Annual Operating Balance
Annual Ending Balance
ITEM 15
35 FIGURE 4.4
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 ZONE 3
for MARIPOSA CREEK
Tax Assessor's Number
Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
204-0500-060-0000 1 $ 864.78
204-0500-061-0000 2 $ 864.78
204-0500-062-0000 3 $ 864.78
204-0500-063-0000 4 $ 864.78
204-0500-064-0000 5 $ 864.78
204-0500-065-0000 6 $ 864.78
204-0500-066-0000 7 $ 864.78
204-0500-067-0000 8 $ 864.78
204-0500-068-0000 9 $ 864.78
204-0500-069-0000 10 $ 864.78
204-0500-070-0000 11 $ 864.78
204-0500-071-0000 12 $ 864.78
204-0500-072-0000 13 $ 864.78
204-0500-073-0000 14 $ 864.78
204-0500-074-0000 15 $ 864.78
15 Parcels; Total 98-02 Zone 3 Assessments is $ 12,971.70 ITEM 15
36 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 – Zone 4 (Wyatt Ranch Subdivision)

GENERAL
Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) 98-02, Zone 4 (Wyatt Ranch Creek Subdivision), first created by City Council action on November 14, 2019, is located on the west side of Sunrise Boulevard at Lawrence Avenue. This LMAD provides for the maintenance of certain areas within and adjacent to the Wyatt Ranch Subdivision development. All improvements are on public property or easements. There are 23 residential parcels in this zone, whose boundaries are more particularly described on the Assessment Diagram contained in Figure 5.1.

Zone 4 consists of twenty three (23) residential parcels and one (1) public utility, wall, landscape and pedestrian walkway easement used for landscaping, masonry wall and walkway along Sunrise Boulevard.

Development of the property was conditioned upon establishing a funding source to provide for ongoing maintenance of landscaping, masonry wall, walkways, and related appurtenances.

The facilities in Zone 4 include landscaping along the west side of Sunrise Boulevard. On-going maintenance of the landscaped areas require routine care of trees, shrubs and groundcover, including weed control, fertilization, mulch replacement, and litter removal. The pedestrian walkways require routine maintenance, including surface and structural maintenance and graffiti abatement. This includes replacement of the walkways in the next 40 years.

The facilities in Zone 4 also include a masonry wall along the west side of Sunrise Boulevard. The walls require routine maintenance, including surface and structural maintenance and graffiti abatement. This item includes replacement of the masonry wall, in the next 40 years.

Figure 5.2 contains a detailed listing of items to be maintained and/or replacement of each of the items. City performs/manages the maintenance for the LMAD using its own forces or those of contract providers.

DISTRICT FINANCING/METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
As a condition of approval, the developer of the single-family Wyatt Ranch Subdivision was required to establish a funding source to provide for ongoing maintenance of the landscaping, irrigation, pedestrian pathways, and masonry wall located within the Public Utility, Wall, Landscape and Pedestrian Walkway Easement. Funding for Zone 4 is be from annual assessments levied on residential parcels within the zone’s assessment boundary (Figure 5.1), pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Because each of the single-family lots within the zone was created as a result of compliance with this condition, each lot benefits in the same proportion.

ITEM 15
37 The formation of this district also included a cost-of-living adjustment provision. Should the cost of landscape maintenance activities and utilities rise, this provision allows for the City of Citrus Heights to increase the annual assessment. Each annual increase, if any, shall not exceed a maximum of four percent 4%.

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
Although formally created by the City Council in November 2019, no assessments were levied on the parcels in this zone until FY 2023/2024 due to the uncertainty of the Covid-19 situation and delays in construction.

An adjustment in the annual assessment per parcel is proposed for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.

Completion of construction of the subdivision and transfer of landscape maintenance responsibilities to the City of Citrus Heights is expected in 2026/2027. To ensure the district establishes a reserve prior to the City assuming responsibility of Zone 3, annual assessments for District 98-02 Zone 4 are proposed to increase by 3% (less than the maximum allowable 4%) over the rates for FY 2025/2026, to approximately $421.34 per residential parcel.

The district’s Assessment Roll is contained in Figure 5.4.

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION OF AREA TO BE MAINTAINED
All that real property situated in the City of Citrus Heights, County of Sacramento, State of California, which is further described as follows:

P.U.E., Wall, Landscape and Pedestrian Easement of the Wyatt Ranch Subdivision; more particularly described on the Assessment Diagram contained in Figure 5.1.

ITEM 15
38 FIGURE 5.1
ITEM 15
39 FIGURE 5.2
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 98-02
Zone 4 (Wyatt Ranch Subdivision)

MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATION
1) Maintain trees and other plantings a minimum of once every two weeks along the Sunrise Boulevard frontage of the subdivision (P.U.E., Wall, Landscape and Pedestrian Easement).

Maintain irrigation system & litter removal, weekly. Weed area a minimum of once every two weeks. Fertilize area a minimum of twice per year. Control infestation of fungus, diseases and/or insects. This item includes utilities (water & electricity), irrigation repair, landscaping materials (wood chips, chemicals, etc.), and replanting as needed. 2) Maintain masonry wall. Clean all graffiti from street-facing side of wall(s) as needed.

Perform structural repairs/replacement as needed.
3) Maintain pedestrian pathway. Clean all graffiti as needed. Perform structural repairs/replacement as needed.

ITEM 15
40 FIGURE 5.3
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 ZONE 4
Fund and County DL 1170
DESCRIPTION FY 25/26**
ACTUAL
FY 26/27

PROPOSED
BUDGET
ASSESSMENT RATES:

Rate Per Parcel $ 409.08 $ 421.34
Total Number of Parcels $ 23.00 $ 23.00
Total Special Assessments $ 9,408.84 $ 9,690.82
REVENUE:

Release from Maintenance/Repair Reserve Balance $ - $ - Release from Facility Replacement Reserve Balance $ - $ - Interest on Fund Balance $ 317.59 $ -
Special Assessments $ 9,736.82 $ 9,690.82
Other Revenue $ - $ -
Total Revenue: 10,054.41 $ $ 9,690.82
EXPENDITURES*:

Materials and Supplies $ - $ -
Advertising & Mail $ - $ 425.00
Utilities - Electric $ - $ 150.00
Utilities - Water $ - $ 600.00
Professional Services $ - $ 50.00
Contract Landscape Maintenance $ - $ 2,500.00
Cost Allocation (Overhead) $ - $ -
Total Expenditures: $ - $ 3,725.00
$ 10,054.41 $ 5,965.82
Transfer to Maintenance/Repair Reserve $ 5,500.00 $ (5,598.28) Transfer to Facility Replacement Reserve $ 6,001.70 $ (1,866.10) $ 21,556.11 $ (1,498.56)

MAINTENANCE /REPAIR RESERVE
Beginning Fund Balance (July 1st) $ 7,289.00 $ 12,789.00 Release to Operating Revenue $ - $ -
Transfer from Operating Balance $ 5,500.00 $ 5,598.28
Ending Operating Reserve Balance (June 30th) $ 12,789.00 $ 18,387.28

FACILITY REPLACEMENT RESERVE
Beginning Facility Replacement Balance (July 1st) $ 18,947.00 $ 24,948.70 Release to Facility Replacement Revenue $ - $ -
Transfer from Operating Balance $ 6,001.70 $ 1,866.10
Ending Facility Replacement Balance (June 30th) $ 24,948.70 $ 26,814.80 * No recorded expenditures for this zone; subdivsion remains under private developer until dedication to city. **
$xx.xx Audited Fund Balance from previous Fiscal Year
Annual Operating Balance
Annual Ending Balance
Recorded actual expenses for the first 3 quarters of the current Fiscal Year plus projection for the 4th quarter.

ITEM 15
41 FIGURE 5.4
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 98-02 ZONE 4
for WYATT RANCH
Tax Assessor's Number Assessment Diagram # Assessment Amount 211-0920-001-0000 1 $ 421.34
211-0920-002-0000 2 $ 421.34
211-0920-003-0000 3 $ 421.34
211-0920-004-0000 4 $ 421.34
211-0920-005-0000 5 $ 421.34
211-0920-006-0000 6 $ 421.34
211-0920-007-0000 7 $ 421.34
211-0920-008-0000 8 $ 421.34
211-0920-009-0000 9 $ 421.34
211-0920-010-0000 10 $ 421.34
211-0920-011-0000 11 $ 421.34
211-0920-012-0000 12 $ 421.34
211-0920-013-0000 13 $ 421.34
211-0920-014-0000 14 $ 421.34
211-0920-015-0000 15 $ 421.34
211-0920-016-0000 16 $ 421.34
211-0920-017-0000 17 $ 421.34
211-0920-018-0000 18 $ 421.34
211-0920-019-0000 19 $ 421.34
211-0920-020-0000 20 $ 421.34
211-0920-023-0000 21 $ 421.34
211-0920-022-0000 22 $ 421.34
211-0920-021-0000 23 $ 421.34
23 Parcels; Total 98-02 Zone 4 Assessments is $ 9,690.82 ITEM 15
42 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 03-01 - ZONE 1 Stock Ranch NORTH (Auburn Commerce District)

GENERAL
This assessment district, first created in 2003, is for the maintenance of certain areas within and adjacent to the Stock Ranch development. All improvements are on public property.

Assessment District 03-01 has two service areas, Zones 1 and 2. The boundaries of Zone 1 are more particularly described in the Assessment Diagram contained in Figure 6.1.

Zone 1 (Auburn Commerce District) is responsible for the landscaping along Auburn Boulevard between San Tomas Drive and Raintree Drive (both sides of the street and the medians), sound walls (surface and structural maintenance) along the east and west sides of the development and the open space north of Arcade Creek including the drainage basins, pedestrian trails and bridge.

The City is committed to the appearance of the development through proper maintenance of the plantings as well as periodic replacement of the plant materials. Additionally, the City also focuses on immediate abatement of graffiti on walls and other public structures.

The City maintains LMAD-related landscape areas in and adjacent to public streets using City forces or those of contract providers. Facilities located in the open-space areas within the District are maintained by the Sunrise Park and Recreation District. Figure 6.2 describes the maintenance specifications for the district.

DISTRICT FINANCING/METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
As a condition of approval, the developer of the commercial zone of Stock Ranch development was required to establish a funding source to provide for ongoing maintenance of the landscaping and irrigation along Auburn Boulevard between San Tomas Drive and Raintree Drive (both sides of the street and the medians), sound walls (surface and structural maintenance) along the east and west sides of the development and the open space north of Arcade Creek including the drainage basins, pedestrian trails and bridge. Funding for the LMAD 03-01 Zone 1 is from annual assessments levied on property within the zone’s assessment boundary (Figure 6.1) pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. By agreement, the developer of the Stock Ranch subdivisions installed and maintained all landscaping improvements described in this Engineer’s Report until the City’s acceptance.

The method used to spread the assessments for Zone 1 is as follows:
• Zone 1 consists of 67.20 total acres with 36.82 acres designated for commercial uses. • The cost to maintain the improvements within Zone 1 is to be allocated as follows:

1. The assessment for each parcel is calculated by multiplying the total developable acres, as shown in Figure 4.4, by the cost per acre.

2. The assessment is subject to an annual adjustment not to exceed 4% beginning with FY 2004-2005.

ITEM 15
43 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT:

An adjustment in the annual assessment rate per acre is proposed for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.

As shown in Figure 6.3. “Summary Analysis”, the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 assessments for District 03-01 Zone 1 are proposed to increase by 3% (less than the maximum allowable 4%) to approximately $2,765.54 per acre. These additional revenues are necessary to support the LMAD 03-01 Zone 1’s operations and maintenance, provided by the Sunrise Recreation and Park District and City forces, and to preserve existing operating and replacement reserves.

Figure 6.4 contains the Assessment Roll for A.D. 03-01 – Zone 1.

FIGURE 6.1
ITEM 15
44 FIGURE 6.2
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 03-01
Zone 1

MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATION
The following sections provide detailed explanations and describe the zone of benefit and the facilities to be maintained.

ZONE 1
Maintained by the City or City contractors:

Landscaping north of Auburn Boulevard and within the median on Auburn Boulevard. Ongoing maintenance of the Auburn Boulevard landscape requires routine care of lawn, trees, shrubs and groundcover, including weed control, fertilization and litter removal.

Drainage facilities in the open space area next to the creek way include three detention basins and drain manholes which will require routine maintenance and include cleaning and clearing of debris.

Maintained by the Sunrise Parks and Recreation District Masonry walls on the east and west side of the zone adjacent to open space areas. These walls require routine maintenance, including surface and structural maintenance and graffiti abatement.

Pedestrian circulation facilities in the Zone includes a pedestrian trail with lighting and benches and pedestrian bridge. The trail and benches will require routine maintenance and lighting along the trail will require period maintenance and replacement of bulbs.

ITEM 15
45 FIGURE 6.3
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 03-01 ZONE 1
28655289; County DL 0276
DESCRIPTION FY 25/26**
ACTUAL
FY 26/27

PROPOSED
BUDGET
ASSESSMENT RATES:

Rate Per Acre $ 2,685.00 $ 2,765.54
Total Number of Acres (12 Parcels) 36.82 36.82
Total Special Assessments* $ 98,861.66 $ 101,827.10
REVENUE:

Release from Fund Balance $ - $ -
Interest on Fund Balance $ 20,749.31 $ -
Special Assessments $ 98,820.45 $ 101,827.10
Contributions $ - $ -
Other Revenue $ - $ -
Total Revenues: 119,569.76 $ $ 101,827.10
EXPENDITURES:

Advertising $ - $ 425.00
Utilities - Electrical $ 2,446.77 $ 2,675.00
Utilities - Water $ 4,295.66 $ 3,700.00
SRPD Maintenance and Vegetation Management $ 112,001.91 $ 86,000.00 Contract - Repairs & Extra Work $ 193.50 $ -
Contract - Landscape Maintenance $ 19,596.00 $ 22,000.00 Contract - Bus Stop Maintenance-Pressure Washing $ 4,743.00 $ 4,800.00 Contract -Materials & Supplies $ - $ -
Cost Allocation (Overhead) $ 3,939.75 $ -
Total Uses of Funds: $ 147,216.59 $ 119,600.00
$ (27,646.83) $ (17,772.90)
Transfer to/from Operating Reserve $ 27,646.83 $ 17,772.90 $ - $ -

OPERATING RESERVE
Beginning Operating Reserve Balance (July 1st) $ 840,570.00 $ 812,923.17 Operating Reserve Set-aside $ - $ -
Transfer from (to) Annual Operating Balance $ (27,646.83) $ (17,772.90) Ending Operating Reserve Balance (June 30th) $ 812,923.17 $ 795,150.27

FACILITY REPLACEMENT RESERVE
Beginning Facility Replacement Balance (July 1st) $ 392,535.00 $ 392,535.00 Facility Replacement Set-aside $ - $ -
Replacement Project Cost $ - $ -
Ending Facility Replacement Balance (June 30th) $ 392,535.00 $ 392,535.00 MAINTENANCE RESERVE $ 420,388.17 $ 402,615.27
* Rounded down per Sac County requirements
**
$xx.xx
Annual Operating Balance
Annual Ending Balance
Recorded actual expenses for the first 3 quarters of the current Fiscal Year plus Audited Fund Balance from previous Fiscal Year
ITEM 15
46 FIGURE 6.4
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 03-01 ZONE 1
for Auburn Commerce District
Tax Assessor's Number
Assessment
Diagram # Area (acres) Amount per Acre Total Assessment 211 0870 012 0000 1 1.44 $ 2,765.54 $ 3,982.38
211 0870 011 0000 2 1.1 $ 2,765.54 $ 3,042.08
211 0870 007 0000 3 0.78 $ 2,765.54 $ 2,157.12
211 0870 006 0000 4 0.61 $ 2,765.54 $ 1,686.98
211 0870 005 0000 5 1.06 $ 2,765.54 $ 2,931.46
211 0870 004 0000 6 0.81 $ 2,765.54 $ 2,240.08
211 0870 003 0000 7 3.55 $ 2,765.54 $ 9,817.66
211 0870 008 0000 8 0.76 $ 2,765.54 $ 2,101.80
211 0870 009 0000 9 0.98 $ 2,765.54 $ 2,710.22
211 0870 010 0000 10 0.98 $ 2,765.54 $ 2,710.22
211 0870 001 0000 11 13.19 $ 2,765.54 $ 36,477.46
211 0870 002 0000 14 11.56 $ 2,765.54 $ 31,969.64
14 Parcels (36.82 Acres; Total 03-01 Zone 1 Assessments is $ 101,827.10 ITEM 15
47 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 03-01 - ZONE 2 Stock Ranch SOUTH

GENERAL
This assessment district, first created in 2003, is for the maintenance of certain areas within and adjacent to the Stock Ranch development. All improvements are on public property.

Assessment District 03-01 has two service areas, Zones 1 and 2. On July 13, 2006, the City Council approved the annexation of Phases 3 and 4 of the Stock Ranch Residential development into Zone

2. The boundaries of Zone 2 are more particularly described on the Assessment Diagram contained in Figure 7.1.

Zone 2 is responsible for the open space on the south side of Arcade Creek and along the north side of Stock Ranch Road, the landscape strip along the north side of Stock Ranch Road (Sol Way to Woodside Drive), the pedestrian trails and park facilities, a future median in Stock Ranch Road, east of the roundabout, and a future landscape strip along the south side of Stock Ranch Road. The City is committed to the appearance of the development through proper maintenance of the plantings as well as periodic replacement of the plant materials. Additionally, the City also focuses on immediate abatement of graffiti on walls and other public structures.

The City maintains LMAD-related landscape areas in and adjacent to public streets using City forces or those of contract providers. Facilities located in the open-space areas within the District are maintained by the Sunrise Park and Recreation District. Figure 7.2 describes the maintenance specifications for the district.

DISTRICT FINANCING/METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
As a condition of approval, the developer of the commercial zone of Stock Ranch development was required to establish a funding source to provide for ongoing maintenance of open space on the south side of Arcade Creek and along the north side of Stock Ranch Road, the landscape strip along the north side of Stock Ranch Road (Sol Way to Woodside Drive), the pedestrian trails and park facilities, a future median in Stock Ranch Road, east of the roundabout, and a future landscape strip along the south side of Stock Ranch Road. Funding for the District is from annual assessments levied on properties within the zone’s assessment boundary (Figure 7.1) pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The original annual assessment adopted for District 03- 01 Zone 2, upon formation in FY 2003/2004 was $82.42 per single-family residential parcel and $411.86 per acre of undeveloped/commercial property.

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT:

Initially LMAD 03-01 Zone 2 was fully funded by its assessments. However, in recent years continued increases in the costs of regular maintenance activities and utilities have resulted in the annual expenses exceeding the annual assessment revenue and operating reserves being depleted ITEM 15
48 to make up the difference. As a result, in FY 2023/2024, the City of Citrus Heights began exercising the cost-of-living increase provision and increased the annual assessment by 3%.

Annual adjustments in the assessment rate are proposed for Fiscal Year 2026/2027. As shown in Figure 7.3. “Summary Analysis”, the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 assessments for District 03- 01 Zone 2 are again proposed to increase by 3% (less than the maximum allowable 4%) over the rates charged in FY 2025/2026. This results in increases to approximately $98.36 per residential parcel and $491.70 per acre of undeveloped/commercial land. These additional revenues are necessary to support the extensive maintenance needs for the district, provided by the Sunrise Recreation and Park District as well as the City through contract services.

Figure 7.4 contains the Assessment Roll for A.D. 03-01 – Zone 2.

ITEM 15
49 FIGURE 7.1
ITEM 15
50 FIGURE 7.2
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 03-01 Zone 2

MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATION

The following sections provide detailed explanations and describe the zone of benefit and the facilities to be maintained.

ZONE 2
Maintained by the City or City contractors:

Along the north side of Stock Ranch Road, the landscaping and irrigation of land within the 15-foot landscape corridor shall be maintained and repaired as necessary. The street frontage landscape includes lawn, trees, shrubs and groundcover. Ongoing street frontage maintenance requires weekly care of the lawn, trees, shrubs and groundcover including weed control, fertilization, pruning and litter removal.

A future median in Stock Ranch Road between Fountain Square Drive and Sol Way and a landscape corridor along the south side of Stock Ranch Road, east of Fountain Square Drive will also be maintained. Once construction is complete, maintenance of these future improvements will begin following a required plant establishment period.

Maintained by the Sunrise Parks and Recreation District:

Zone 2 includes maintenance of the open space area south of Arcade Creek and within the open space parcels located immediately east of Stock Ranch Road. Routine maintenance includes pruning, tree and shrub maintenance and weed abatement adjacent to homes within the District. A post and cable fence between Stock Ranch Road and the open space parcels will require periodic maintenance and replacement.

Pedestrian circulation facilities in the Zone include a pedestrian trail that requires routine maintenance.

ITEM 15
51 FIGURE 7.3
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 03-01 ZONE 2
28755289; County DL 0278
DESCRIPTION FY 25/26**
ACTUAL
FY 26/27

PROPOSED
BUDGET
ASSESSMENT RATES:

Rate Per Parcel (Residential) $ 95.50 $ 98.36
Total Number of Residential Parcels 121 121
Sub-Total A $ 11,555.50 $ 11,901.56
Rate Per Acre (Commercial/Undeveloped) $ 477.39 $ 491.71 Total Number of Acres (5 Parcels)*** 23.18 23.18
Sub-Total B $ 11,065.90 $ 11,397.82
Total Special Assessments (A+B) $ 22,621.40 $ 23,299.38 REVENUE:

Release from Fund Balance $ - $ -
Interest on Fund Balance $ 1,117.00 $ -
Special Assessments $ 22,490.56 $ 23,299.38
Contributions $ - $ -
Other Revenue $ - $ -
Total Revenues: 23,607.56 $ $ 23,299.38
EXPENDITURES:

Advertising $ - $ 425.00
Materials and Supplies $ 1,222.96 $ -
Utilities - Electric $ 992.92 $ 800.00
Utilities - Water $ 1,857.03 $ 2,650.00
SRPD Maintenance Services $ 7,775.67 $ 12,500.00
Contract - Landscape Maintenance $ 3,168.00 $ 3,300.00
Contract - Repairs, Tree Trimming & Extra Work $ 2,673.00 $ - Cost Allocation (Overhead) $ 3,576.16 $ -
Total Expenditures: $ 21,265.74 $ 19,675.00
$ 1,224.82 $ 3,624.38
Transfer to/from Operating Reserve $ - $ -
$ 1,224.82 $ 3,624.38

OPERATING RESERVE
Beginning Fund Balance (July 1st) $ 53,022.00 $ 55,363.82 Operating Reserve Set-a-side $ 23,607.56 $ 23,299.38
Transfer from (to) Annual Operating Balance $ 21,265.74 $ 19,675.00 Ending Operating Reserve Balance (June 30th) $ 55,363.82 $ 58,988.20

FACILITY REPLACEMENT RESERVE
Beginning Facility Replacement Balance (July 1st) $ - $ - Annual Replacement Set-aside $ - $ -
Subtract Replacement Project Cost $ - $ -
EndingFacility Replacement Balance (June 30th) $ - $ -
TOTAL RESERVE $ 55,363.82 $ 58,988.20
**
$xx.xx
Annual Operating Balance
Annual Ending Balance
Recorded actual expenses for the first 3 quarters of the current Fiscal Year plus Audited Fund Balance from previous Fiscal Year
ITEM 15
52 FIGURE 7.4
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 03-01 ZONE 2 for STOCK RANCH (RESIDENTIAL PARCELS) Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
243 0590 026 0000 1 $ 98.36
243 0590 027 0000 2 $ 98.36
243 0590 028 0000 3 $ 98.36
243 0590 029 0000 4 $ 98.36
243 0590 030 0000 5 $ 98.36
243 0590 031 0000 6 $ 98.36
243 0590 032 0000 7 $ 98.36
243 0590 033 0000 8 $ 98.36
243 0590 034 0000 9 $ 98.36
243 0590 035 0000 10 98.36 $
243 0590 036 0000 11 98.36 $
243 0590 037 0000 12 98.36 $
243 0590 038 0000 13 98.36 $
243 0590 039 0000 14 98.36 $
243 0590 040 0000 15 98.36 $
243 0590 041 0000 16 98.36 $
243 0590 042 0000 17 98.36 $
243 0590 043 0000 18 98.36 $
243 0590 044 0000 19 98.36 $
243 0590 045 0000 20 98.36 $
243 0590 046 0000 21 98.36 $
243 0590 047 0000 22 98.36 $
243 0590 048 0000 23 98.36 $
243 0590 049 0000 24 98.36 $
243 0590 050 0000 25 98.36 $
243 0590 051 0000 26 98.36 $
243 0590 052 0000 27 98.36 $
243 0590 053 0000 28 98.36 $
243 0590 054 0000 29 98.36 $
243 0590 055 0000 30 98.36 $
243 0590 056 0000 31 98.36 $
243 0590 057 0000 32 98.36 $
243 0590 058 0000 33 98.36 $
243 0590 059 0000 34 98.36 $
243 0590 060 0000 35 98.36 $
243 0590 061 0000 36 98.36 $
243 0590 062 0000 37 98.36 $
243 0590 063 0000 38 98.36 $
243 0590 064 0000 39 98.36 $
243 0590 065 0000 40 98.36 $
243 0590 066 0000 41 98.36 $
243 0590 067 0000 42 98.36 $
243 0590 068 0000 43 98.36 $
243 0590 069 0000 44 98.36 $
243 0590 070 0000 45 98.36 $
243 0590 071 0000 46 98.36 $
243 0590 072 0000 47 98.36 $
211 0590 001 0000 48 98.36 $
211 0880 002 0000 49 98.36 $
Subtotal = $ 4,819.64
Tax Assessor's Number
ITEM 15
53 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 03-01 ZONE 2 for STOCK RANCH (RESIDENTIAL PARCELS) Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
211 0880 003 0000 50 98.36 $
211 0880 004 0000 51 98. $ 36
211 0880 005 0000 52 98.36 $
211 0880 006 0000 53 98.36 $
211 0880 007 0000 54 98.36 $
211 0880 008 0000 55 98.36 $
211 0880 009 0000 56 98.36 $
211 0880 010 0000 57 98.36 $
211 0880 011 0000 58 98.36 $
211 0880 012 0000 59 98.36 $
211 0880 013 0000 60 98.36 $
211 0880 014 0000 61 98.36 $
211 0880 015 0000 62 98.36 $
211 0880 016 0000 63 98.36 $
211 0880 017 0000 64 98.36 $
211 0880 018 0000 65 98.36 $
211 0880 019 0000 66 98.36 $
211 0880 020 0000 67 98.36 $
211 0880 021 0000 68 98.36 $
211 0880 022 0000 69 98.36 $
211 0880 023 0000 70 98.36 $
243 0590 073 0000 71 98.36 $
243 0590 074 0000 72 98.36 $
243 0590 075 0000 73 98.36 $
243 0590 001 0000 74 98.36 $
243 0590 002 0000 75 98.36 $
243 0590 003 0000 76 98.36 $
243 0590 004 0000 77 98.36 $
243 0590 005 0000 78 98.36 $
243 0590 006 0000 79 98.36 $
243 0590 007 0000 80 98.36 $
243 0590 008 0000 81 98.36 $
243 0590 009 0000 82 98.36 $
243 0590 010 0000 83 98.36 $
243 0590 011 0000 84 98.36 $
243 0590 012 0000 85 98.36 $
243 0590 013 0000 86 98.36 $
243 0590 014 0000 87 98.36 $
243 0590 015 0000 88 98.36 $
243 0590 016 0000 89 98.36 $
243 0590 017 0000 90 98.36 $
243 0590 018 0000 91 98.36 $
243 0590 019 0000 92 98.36 $
243 0590 020 0000 93 98.36 $
243 0590 021 0000 94 98.36 $
243 0590 022 0000 95 98.36 $
243 0590 023 0000 96 98.36 $
243 0590 024 0000 97 98.36 $
243 0590 025 0000 98 98.36 $
Subtotal = 4,819.64$
Tax Assessor's Number
ITEM 15
54 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 03-01 ZONE 2 for STOCK RANCH (RESIDENTIAL PARCELS) Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
211 0880 026 0000 104 98.36 $
211 0880 027 0000 105 98.36 $
211 0880 028 0000 106 98.36 $
211 0880 029 0000 107 98.36 $
211 0880 030 0000 108 98.36 $
211 0880 031 0000 109 98.36 $
211 0880 032 0000 110 98.36 $
211 0880 033 0000 111 98.36 $
211 0880 034 0000 112 98.36 $
211 0880 035 0000 113 98.36 $
211 0880 036 0000 114 98.36 $
211 0880 037 0000 115 98. $ 36
211 0880 038 0000 116 98.36 $
211 0880 039 0000 117 98.36 $
211 0880 040 0000 118 98.36 $
211 0880 041 0000 119 98.36 $
211 0880 042 0000 120 98.36 $
211 0590 081 0000 121 98.36 $
211 0590 082 0000 122 98.36 $
211 0590 083 0000 123 98.36 $
211 0590 084 0000 124 98.36 $
211 0590 085 0000 125 98.36 $
211 590 086 0000 126 98.36 $
Subtotal = $ 2,262.28
Sub-total Assessment - 121 Residential Parcels = $ 11,901.56 Tax Assessor's Number
ITEM 15
55 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 03-01 – ZONE 2 (COMMERCIAL PARCELS) Revised Tax Assessor's Number*
Assessment Diagram
# Area (acres) Amount per Acre Total Assessment
243 0010 045 0000 99 8.00 $ 491.70 $ 3,933.60
243 0010 051 0000 100 0.55 $ 491.70 $ 270.44
243 0010 050 0000 101 1.77 $ 491.70 $ 870.30
243 0010 027 0000** 102 11.08 $ 491.70 $ 5,448.04
243 0020 051 0000 103 1.78 $ 491.70 $ 875.22
Sub-total Assessment - 5 Commercial Parcels in 03-01, Zone 2 = $ 11,397.58 *based on current county parcel viewer data; reflects lot splits and new assigned parcel numbers **no change to parcel number.

Grand Total Assessment (Residential & Commercial Parcels) = $ 23,299.14 ITEM 15
56 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 03-01 – Zone 3 (Mitchell Farms Subdivision)

GENERAL
Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) 03-01, Zone 3 (Mitchell Farms Subdivision), first created by City Council action on April 23, 2020, is located east of Sunrise Boulevard, north of Arcadia Drive, and west of Fair Oaks Boulevard. This LMAD provides for the maintenance of a large open-space lot within the Mitchell Farms Subdivision development and landscaping within a roundabout on Arcadia Drive. All improvements are on public property.

There are 258 residential parcels in this district, whose boundaries are more particularly described on the Assessment Diagram contained in Figure 8.1.

This subdivision of land, covered by Zone 3, includes 258 residential lots, one public park lot (Lot A) and 51 common area and alley lots owned and maintained by the Homeowners Association (HOA). Upon recordation of the Final Map and completion of the construction of the park improvements, Lot A will be dedicated to Sunrise Recreation and Parks District (SRPD).

To supplement the available funding for the long-term maintenance and replacement costs for the improvements within Lot A and the landscaping and irrigation within the new Arcadia Drive roundabout, the development was conditioned to create a new Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD).

Public amenities in Zone 3, to be maintained on an annual basis with this LMAD funding, include trees, natural grasses, irrigation systems, pedestrian/bike pathways, pathway lighting and bridges within the open-space lot (Lot A) and landscaping and irrigation system within the Arcadia Drive roundabout. On-going maintenance of the landscaped areas requires routine care of trees, shrubs, and groundcover, including weed control, fertilization, mulch replacement, litter removal and irrigation systems. The pedestrian pathways and associated bridges require routine maintenance, including surface and structural maintenance, maintenance and repairs of pathway lighting and graffiti abatement.

In addition to regular annual maintenance, the facilities in Zone 3 (pedestrian/bike pathway, bridges, pathway lighting system, irrigation system, roundabout landscape and irrigation) require periodic major repairs and/or replacement. Zone 3 provides a funding set-aside for long-term capital replacement of these items.

Figure 8.2 contains a detailed listing of items to be maintained and/or replacement of each of the items. City and the SRPD perform/manage the maintenance for the LMAD using its own forces or those of contract providers.

ITEM 15
57 DISTRICT FINANCING/METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
As a condition of approval, the developer of the single-family Mitchell Farms Subdivision was required to establish a funding source to provide for ongoing maintenance of the landscaping include trees, natural grasses, irrigation systems, pedestrian/bike pathways, pathway lighting and bridges within the open-space lot (Lot A) and landscaping and irrigation system within the Arcadia Drive roundabout. The funding for LMAD 03-01, Zone 3 will be from annual assessments levied on property within the zone’s assessment boundary (Figure 8.1), pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Because each of the single-family lots within the zone was created as a result of compliance with this condition, each lot benefits in the same proportion. Therefore, the assessment costs are allocated on a per parcel basis for all assessment diagram parcels located in the Assessment District that qualified as a buildable single-family parcel per the current City of Citrus Heights Zoning Ordinances.

The method used to spread the initial assessments for each lot are as follows:
• Zone 3 consists of 258 residential lots, 30 lettered HOA landscape lots, 20 alley lots, and one public park lot (Lot A).
• The costs of the maintenance for the improvements within Mitchell Farms are to be allocated as follows:
• The assessment for each Assessor’s Parcel is calculated by dividing the total annual cost, by the total number of residential lots within the subdivision. As follows: Annual cost/number of lots = Annual cost of $88,851.20 divided by 258 lots = $344.38 per lot per year.
• The formation of this district also included a cost-of-living adjustment provision. Should the cost of landscape maintenance activities and utilities rise, this provision allows for the City of Citrus Heights to increase the annual assessment by an amount not to exceed a maximum of four percent 4% per year.

The development is currently under construction, so the developer has agreed to maintain the landscaped areas and other features until the proposed improvements are formally accepted by the agencies (Sunrise Recreation and Parks District for Lot A and the City of Citrus Heights for the Arcadia Drive roundabout).

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
Annual adjustments in the assessment rate are proposed for Fiscal Year 2026/2027. As shown in Figure 8.3. “Summary Analysis”, the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 assessments for District 03- 01 Zone 3 are again proposed to increase by 3% (less than the maximum allowable 4%) over the rates charged in FY 2025/2026. This results in increases to approximately $372.62 per residential parcel. These additional revenues are necessary to support the extensive maintenance needs for the District, develop a sufficient capital replacement reserve for the extensive public facilities contained with Zone 3, such as bridges, paved trails, lighting and playground equipment, owned and maintained by the Sunrise Recreation and Park District, as well as minor maintenance services provided by the City through contract services.

ITEM 15
58 The district’s Assessment Roll is contained in Figure 8.4.

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION OF AREA TO BE MAINTAINED
All that real property situated in the City of Citrus Heights, County of Sacramento, State of California, which is further described as follows:

Lot A of the Mitchell Farms Subdivision and the adjacent Arcadia Drive roundabout; more particularly described on the Assessment Diagram contained in Figure 8.1.

ITEM 15
59 FIGURE 8.1
ITEM 15
60 FIGURE 8.2
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 03-01
Zone 3 (Mitchell Farms Subdivision)

MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATION
1) Maintain pedestrian pathway (Lot A). Clean all graffiti as needed. Perform structural repairs/replacement as needed. This item includes repair and materials to maintain the light bollards along the pathway.
2) Maintain pedestrian pathway bridges (Lot A). Clean all graffiti as needed. Perform structural repairs/replacement to handrails, deck, abutments and other bridge appurtenances as needed.
3) Maintain the creek open space (Lot A). Keep the existing creek open space free from debris to assure flow of Arcade Creek, maintain irrigation system and regular inspection and pruning for health of all trees (including planted mitigation trees), Mow open-space as needed for fuel-load management and appearance.
4) Maintain trees and other plantings a minimum of once every two weeks in the planters (center of roundabout and three approach islands) at the Arcadia Drive roundabout.

Maintain irrigation system as needed to ensure proper operation and optimum health of the plantings. Weed area a minimum of once every two weeks. Fertilize area a minimum of twice per year. Control infestation of fungus, diseases and/or insects. This item includes irrigation repair, landscaping materials (wood chips, chemicals, etc.), and replanting as needed.

ITEM 15
61 FIGURE 8.3
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 03-01 ZONE 3
29655289; County DL1128
DESCRIPTION FY 25/26**
ACTUAL
FY 26/27

PROPOSED
BUDGET
ASSESSMENT RATES:

Rate Per Parcel $361.78 $372.62
Total Number of Parcels 258 258
Total Special Assessments $93,339.24 $96,135.96
REVENUE:

Release from Maintenance/Repair Reserve Balance $0.00 $0.00 Release from Facility Replacement Reserve Balance $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Fund Balance $5,980.56 $0.00
Special Assessments $92,765.55 $96,135.96
Contributions (SRPD Participation) $0.00
Other Revenue $0.00 $0.00
Total Revenue: $98,746.11 $96,135.96
EXPENDITURES:

Materials and Supplies $0.00 $0.00
Advertising & Mail $0.00 $365.00
Utilities $200.50 $300.00
City Contract Landscape $0.00 $1,200.00
SRPD Maintenance $18,495.00 $67,000.00
Cost Allocation* (Overhead) $0.00 $0.00
Maintenance/Repair Annual Accrual (3) $5,349.85 $5,349.85 Facility Replacement Annual Accrual (3) $51,416.42 $21,921.11 Total Expenditures: $75,461.77 $96,135.96
$23,284.34 $0.00
Transfer to Maintenance/Repair Reserve -$23,284.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

ACCRUAL SUMMARY

MAINTENANCE/REPAIR RESERVE
Beginning Maintenance/Repair Reserve Balance (7/1) $ 162,957.96 $191,592.15 Release to Revenue (to cover annual operating costs) $0.00 $0.00 Maintenance/Repair Reserve Annual Accrual $5,349.85 $5,349.85 Transfer from Annual Operating Balance $23,284.34 $0.00 Ending Maintenance/Repair Reserve Balance (6/30) $ 191,592.15 $ 196,942.00

FACILITY REPLACEMENT RESERVE
Beginning Facility Replacement Reserve Balance (7/1) $ 216,014.04 $267,430.46 Release to Revenue (for scheduled facility replacement) $0.00 $0.00 Facility Replacement Annual Accrual $51,416.42 $21,921.11 Ending Facility Replacement Reserve Balance (6/30) $267,430.46 $289,351.57 *
$xx.xx Audited Fund Balance from previous Fiscal Year
Annual Operating Balance
Annual Ending Balance
Annual set-aside amounts from Exhibits D1 & D2 in original Engineer's Report dated April 23, 2020. Adjustments made in consideration of large replacement reserve ahead of taking possession of property, and need to free up maintenance funds for SRPD maintenance needs.

ITEM 15
62 FIGURE 8.4
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 03-01 ZONE 3
for Mitchell Village
Assessment
Diagram #
Assessment
Amount
Assessment
Diagram # Assessment
Amount
243 0600 001 0000 1 $ 372.62 243 0610 023 0000 49 $ 372.62 243 0600 002 0000 2 $ 372.62 243 0610 024 0000 50 $ 372.62 243 0600 003 0000 3 $ 372.62 243 0610 025 0000 51 $ 372.62 243 0600 004 0000 4 $ 372.62 243 0610 026 0000 52 $ 372.62 243 0600 005 0000 5 $ 372.62 243 0610 027 0000 53 $ 372.62 243 0600 006 0000 6 $ 372.62 243 0610 028 0000 54 $ 372.62 243 0600 007 0000 7 $ 372.62 243 0610 029 0000 55 $ 372.62 243 0600 008 0000 8 $ 372.62 243 0610 030 0000 56 $ 372.62 243 0600 009 0000 9 $ 372.62 243 0610 031 0000 57 $ 372.62 243 0600 010 0000 10 $ 372.62 243 0610 032 0000 58 $ 372.62 243 0600 011 0000 11 $ 372.62 243 0610 033 0000 59 $ 372.62 243 0600 012 0000 12 $ 372.62 243 0610 034 0000 60 $ 372.62 243 0600 013 0000 13 $ 372.62 243 0610 035 0000 61 $ 372.62 243 0600 014 0000 14 $ 372.62 243 0610 036 0000 62 $ 372.62 243 0600 015 0000 15 $ 372.62 243 0610 037 0000 63 $ 372.62 243 0600 016 0000 16 $ 372.62 243 0610 038 0000 64 $ 372.62 243 0600 017 0000 17 $ 372.62 243 0610 039 0000 65 $ 372.62 243 0600 018 0000 18 $ 372.62 243 0610 040 0000 66 $ 372.62 243 0600 019 0000 19 $ 372.62 243 0610 041 0000 67 $ 372.62 243 0600 020 0000 20 $ 372.62 243 0610 042 0000 68 $ 372.62 243 0600 021 0000 21 $ 372.62 243 0610 043 0000 69 $ 372.62 243 0600 022 0000 22 $ 372.62 243 0610 044 0000 70 $ 372.62 243 0600 023 0000 23 $ 372.62 243 0610 045 0000 71 $ 372.62 243 0600 024 0000 24 $ 372.62 243 0610 046 0000 72 $ 372.62 243 0600 025 0000 25 $ 372.62 243 0610 047 0000 73 $ 372.62 243 0600 026 0000 26 $ 372.62 243 0610 048 0000 74 $ 372.62 243 0610 001 0000 27 $ 372.62 243 0610 049 0000 75 $ 372.62 243 0610 002 0000 28 $ 372.62 243 0610 050 0000 76 $ 372.62 243 0610 003 0000 29 $ 372.62 243 0610 051 0000 77 $ 372.62 243 0610 004 0000 30 $ 372.62 243 0610 052 0000 78 $ 372.62 243 0610 005 0000 31 $ 372.62 243 0610 053 0000 79 $ 372.62 243 0610 006 0000 32 $ 372.62 243 0610 054 0000 80 $ 372.62 243 0610 007 0000 33 $ 372.62 243 0610 055 0000 81 $ 372.62 243 0610 008 0000 34 $ 372.62 243 0610 056 0000 82 $ 372.62 243 0610 009 0000 35 $ 372.62 243 0610 057 0000 83 $ 372.62 243 0610 010 0000 36 $ 372.62 243 0610 058 0000 84 $ 372.62 243 0610 011 0000 37 $ 372.62 243 0610 059 0000 85 $ 372.62 243 0610 012 0000 38 $ 372.62 243 0610 060 0000 86 $ 372.62 243 0610 013 0000 39 $ 372.62 243 0610 061 0000 87 $ 372.62 243 0610 014 0000 40 $ 372.62 243 0610 062 0000 88 $ 372.62 243 0610 015 0000 41 $ 372.62 243 0610 063 0000 89 $ 372.62 243 0610 016 0000 42 $ 372.62 243 0610 064 0000 90 $ 372.62 243 0610 017 0000 43 $ 372.62 243 0610 065 0000 91 $ 372.62 243 0610 018 0000 44 $ 372.62 243 0610 066 0000 92 $ 372.62 243 0610 019 0000 45 $ 372.62 243 0610 067 0000 93 $ 372.62 243 0610 020 0000 46 $ 372.62 243 0610 068 0000 94 $ 372.62 243 0610 021 0000 47 $ 372.62 243 0610 069 0000 95 $ 372.62 243 0610 022 0000 48 $ 372.62 243 0610 070 0000 96 $ 372.62 Subtotal = $ 17,885.76 Subtotal = $ 17,885.76
Tax Assessor's Number Tax Assessor's Number
ITEM 15
63 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 03-01 ZONE 3
for Mitchell Village
Assessment
Diagram # Assessment
Amount
Assessment
Diagram # Assessment
Amount
243 0610 071 0000 97 $ 372.62 243 0620 042 0000 145 372.62 $ 243 0610 072 0000 98 $ 372.62 243 0620 043 0000 146 372.62 $ 243 0610 073 0000 99 $ 372.62 243 0620 044 0000 147 372.62 $ 243 0610 074 0000 100 372.62 $ 243 0620 045 0000 148 372.62 $ 243 0610 075 0000 101 372.62 $ 243 0620 046 0000 149 372.62 $ 243 0610 076 0000 102 372.62 $ 243 0620 047 0000 150 372.62 $ 243 0610 077 0000 103 372.62 $ 243 0620 048 0000 151 372.62 $ 243 0620 001 0000 104 372.62 $ 243 0620 049 0000 152 372.62 $ 243 0620 002 0000 105 372.62 $ 243 0620 050 0000 153 372.62 $ 243 0620 003 0000 106 372.62 $ 243 0620 051 0000 154 372.62 $ 243 0620 004 0000 107 372.62 $ 243 0620 052 0000 155 372.62 $ 243 0620 005 0000 108 372.62 $ 243 0620 053 0000 156 372.62 $ 243 0620 006 0000 109 372.62 $ 243 0620 054 0000 157 372.62 $ 243 0620 007 0000 110 372.62 $ 243 0620 055 0000 158 372.62 $ 243 0620 008 0000 111 372.62 $ 243 0620 056 0000 159 372.62 $ 243 0620 009 0000 112 372.62 $ 243 0620 057 0000 160 372.62 $ 243 0620 010 0000 113 372.62 $ 243 0620 058 0000 161 372.62 $ 243 0620 011 0000 114 372.62 $ 243 0620 059 0000 162 372.62 $ 243 0620 012 0000 115 372.62 $ 243 0620 060 0000 163 372.62 $ 243 0620 013 0000 116 372.62 $ 243 0630 001 0000 164 372.62 $ 243 0620 014 0000 117 372.62 $ 243 0630 002 0000 165 372.62 $ 243 0620 015 0000 118 372.62 $ 243 0630 003 0000 166 372.62 $ 243 0620 016 0000 119 372.62 $ 243 0630 004 0000 167 372.62 $ 243 0620 017 0000 120 372.62 $ 243 0630 005 0000 168 372.62 $ 243 0620 018 0000 121 372.62 $ 243 0630 006 0000 169 372.62 $ 243 0620 019 0000 122 372. $ 62 243 0630 007 0000 170 372.62 $ 243 0620 020 0000 123 372.62 $ 243 0630 008 0000 171 372.62 $ 243 0620 021 0000 124 372.62 $ 243 0630 009 0000 172 372.62 $ 243 0620 022 0000 125 372.62 $ 243 0630 010 0000 173 372.62 $ 243 0620 023 0000 126 372.62 $ 243 0630 011 0000 174 372.62 $ 243 0620 024 0000 127 372.62 $ 243 0630 012 0000 175 372.62 $ 243 0620 025 0000 128 372.62 $ 243 0630 013 0000 176 372.62 $ 243 0620 026 0000 129 372.62 $ 243 0630 014 0000 177 372.62 $ 243 0620 027 0000 130 372.62 $ 243 0630 015 0000 178 372.62 $ 243 0620 028 0000 131 372.62 $ 243 0630 016 0000 179 372.62 $ 243 0620 029 0000 132 372.62 $ 243 0630 017 0000 180 372.62 $ 243 0620 030 0000 133 372.62 $ 243 0630 018 0000 181 372.62 $ 243 0620 031 0000 134 372.62 $ 243 0630 019 0000 182 372.62 $ 243 0620 032 0000 135 372.62 $ 243 0630 020 0000 183 372.62 $ 243 0620 033 0000 136 372.62 $ 243 0630 021 0000 184 372.62 $ 243 0620 034 0000 137 372.62 $ 243 0630 022 0000 185 372.62 $ 243 0620 035 0000 138 372.62 $ 243 0630 023 0000 186 372.62 $ 243 0620 036 0000 139 372.62 $ 243 0630 024 0000 187 372.62 $ 243 0620 037 0000 140 372.62 $ 243 0630 025 0000 188 372.62 $ 243 0620 038 0000 141 372.62 $ 243 0630 026 0000 189 372.62 $ 243 0620 039 0000 142 372.62 $ 243 0630 027 0000 190 372.62 $ 243 0620 040 0000 143 372.62 $ 243 0630 028 0000 191 372.62 $ 243 0620 041 0000 144 372.62 $ 243 0630 029 0000 192 372.62 $ Subtotal = $ 17,885.76 Subtotal = 17,885.76$
Tax Assessor's Number Tax Assessor's Number
ITEM 15
64 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 03-01 ZONE 3
for Mitchell Village
Assessment
Diagram # Assessment
Amount
Assessment
Diagram # Assessment Amount
243 0630 030 0000 193 372.62 $ 243 0630 078 0000 241 $ 372.62 243 0630 031 0000 194 372.62 $ 243 0630 079 0000 242 $ 372.62 243 0630 032 0000 195 372.62 $ 243 0630 080 0000 243 $ 372.62 243 0630 033 0000 196 372.62 $ 243 0630 081 0000 244 $ 372.62 243 0630 034 0000 197 372.62 $ 243 0630 082 0000 245 $ 372.62 243 0630 035 0000 198 372.62 $ 243 0630 083 0000 246 $ 372.62 243 0630 036 0000 199 372.62 $ 243 0630 084 0000 247 $ 372.62 243 0630 037 0000 200 372.62 $ 243 0630 085 0000 248 $ 372.62 243 0630 038 0000 201 372.62 $ 243 0630 086 0000 249 $ 372.62 243 0630 039 0000 202 372.62 $ 243 0630 087 0000 250 $ 372.62 243 0630 040 0000 203 372.62 $ 243 0630 088 0000 251 $ 372.62 243 0630 041 0000 204 372.62 $ 243 0630 089 0000 252 $ 372.62 243 0630 042 0000 205 372.62 $ 243 0630 090 0000 253 $ 372.62 243 0630 043 0000 206 372.62 $ 243 0630 091 0000 254 $ 372.62 243 0630 044 0000 207 372.62 $ 243 0630 092 0000 255 $ 372.62 243 0630 045 0000 208 372.62 $ 243 0630 093 0000 256 $ 372.62 243 0630 046 0000 209 372.62 $ 243 0630 094 0000 257 $ 372.62 243 0630 047 0000 210 372.62 $ 243 0630 095 0000 258 $ 372.62 243 0630 048 0000 211 372.62 $ Subtotal = $ 6,707.16
243 0630 049 0000 212 372.62 $
243 0630 050 0000 213 372.62 $
243 0630 051 0000 214 372.62 $
243 0630 052 0000 215 372.62 $ Total 03-01 Zone 3 Assessments (258 Parcels) is $ 96,135.96 243 0630 053 0000 216 372.62 $
243 0630 054 0000 217 372.62 $
243 0630 055 0000 218 372.62 $
243 0630 056 0000 219 372.62 $
243 0630 057 0000 220 372.62 $
243 0630 058 0000 221 372.62 $
243 0630 059 0000 222 372.62 $
243 0630 060 0000 223 372.62 $
243 0630 061 0000 224 372. $ 62
243 0630 062 0000 225 372.62 $
243 0630 063 0000 226 372.62 $
243 0630 064 0000 227 372.62 $
243 0630 065 0000 228 372.62 $
243 0630 066 0000 229 372.62 $
243 0630 067 0000 230 372.62 $
243 0630 068 0000 231 372.62 $
243 0630 069 0000 232 372.62 $
243 0630 070 0000 233 372.62 $
243 0630 071 0000 234 372.62 $
243 0630 072 0000 235 372.62 $
243 0630 073 0000 236 372.62 $
243 0630 074 0000 237 372.62 $
243 0630 075 0000 238 372.62 $
243 0630 076 0000 239 372.62 $
243 0630 077 0000 240 372.62 $
Subtotal = 17,885.76$
Tax Assessor's Number Tax Assessor's Number
ITEM 15

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 8, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Regina Cave, General Services Director
Leslie Blomquist, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Citrus Heights Lighting Assessment District
Levy of Fiscal Year for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Annual Assessments Recommendation
On June 24, 2026, the City Council took the first steps toward the proposed annual update for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 for the Citrus Heights Lighting District (CHLD). At that time, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to update the CHLD and called for a public hearing on July 8, 2026. Subsequently, the City Clerk published the required notice.

No changes are recommended to the assessment rates in conjunction with the annual update of the CHLD. However, over the past fiscal year, new streetlights and infrastructure have been installed at various locations throughout the City. Staff updated the assessment role to reflect the new rates for several individual parcels that now benefit from the newly installed lighting.

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Convene a public hearing for the District regarding the proposed annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2026/2027; and

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-____ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, to confirm the Diagram and Assessment and to levy Fiscal Year 2026/2027 assessments for the Citrus Heights Lighting Assessment District.

City Council Strategic Goal/Objective
This item aligns with the following Citrus Heights City Council Strategic Plan Three Year Goal:

Goal: Maintain Public Infrastructure and Enhance All Modes of Transportation.

Fiscal Impact
ITEM 16
Subject: Citrus Heights Lighting District – Levy Assessments for Fiscal Year 26/27 Date: July 8, 2026

Page 2 of 5 ends

During Fiscal Year 2025/2026, CHLD (Fund 289) had a shortfall of $134,421.98, which was covered using Measure A Maintenance funds (Fund 210).

For Fiscal Year 2026/27, the annual special assessment revenue, interest earnings and reimbursement from Caltrans for several shared facilities are projected to cover a portion of the CHLD’s anticipated expenditures. However, as a result of the continuing increases to electrical power costs and the ongoing repairs related to aging equipment, the proposed Fiscal Year 2025/26 budget reflects an anticipated shortfall of approximately $113,590.72.

In FY 21/22 the City upgraded 593 street lights to low energy LED models utilizing a low interest (1%) loan granted by the California Energy Commission. While this effort resulted in annual electricity cost savings, the City began repayment of the loan in FY 22/23 which is paid for utilizing associated energy cost savings.

During this past FY (FY 25/26), the City added a Senior Traffic Signal and Lighting Technician to enhance in-house capability as part of the ongoing effort to reduce costs, improve operational efficiency, and increase response times. With this added staffing, it is anticipated that the scope of the existing contract for unscheduled street light maintenance (knockdowns and repairs) will be substantially reduced as this staff position will perform the majority of regular street light maintenance and initial emergency response tasks in-house.

A summary of the CHLD budget is as follows:

Description
FY 25/26
Actual
FY 26/27
Anticipated
REVENUE:

Special Assessments $330,941.57 $334,000.00
Shared Maintenance Cost Reimbursement from
Caltrans $112.82 $115.00
Interest Earned $64.04 $65.00
Total District Funding $331,118.43 $334,180.00
EXPENDITURES:

SMUD Electric Costs(1) $243,451.26 $244,000.00
Unscheduled Maintenance Costs and Knockdowns(1) $155,737.00 $35,000.00 Streetlight Materials and Supplies(2) $20,304.47 $45,000.00 Streetlight Maintenance Salary Allocations(2) $0.00 $76,600.00 CEC Loan Repayment(3) $23,155.72 $23,155.72
Other Costs $22,891.96 $24,015.00
Total District Expenditures $465,540.41 $447,770.72
ITEM 16
Subject: Citrus Heights Lighting District – Levy Assessments for Fiscal Year 26/27 Date: July 8, 2026

Page 3 of 5 ends

DISTRICT SHORTFALL -$134,421.98 -$113,590.72
(1) At the time this staff report was written, June 2026 utility and June 2026 unscheduled maintenance costs had yet to be finalized. Special Assessments have yet to be finalized.

Costs are estimated.
(2) In 2026, the City hired a Senior Traffic Signal & Lighting Technician. This position is responsible to perform in-house routine street light maintenance; requiring salary allocation and material procurement.
(3) FY 26/27 represents the 5th year for repayment of a low interest (1%) Energy Efficiency Loan from the California Energy Commission (CEC) for conversion of 593 streetlights to energy efficient models. Actual energy cost savings will be used to repay the loan.

Although there is no impact to the General Fund, Measure A Maintenance funds (Fund 210) are proposed to supplement the special assessments to cover the anticipated FY 26/27 CHLD budget shortfall.

On January 1, 1997, when the City incorporated and assumed ownership of all streetlights within the new City limits, CHLD revenues were essentially fixed due to the passage of Proposition 218 in November 1996. However, over the years, expenses (electricity, labor, materials, aging infrastructure, etc.) have continued to rise resulting in a District shortfall each year. Historically, the City has supplemented the CHLD budget utilizing Measure A Maintenance Funds.

Proposition 218 limits the ability of local governments to increase assessments on property owners without their consent. Before increasing the fees for the CHLD, the City would first need consent of two-thirds of affected property owners through a vote or a protest process. Since each and every property within City limits is a property owner within the CHLD assessment area, the proposition 218 ballot process for a proposed increase to the CHLD assessment rates would be extensive and lengthy, and is estimated to cost approximately $100,000 and take 12- 18 months to implement.

Assessment Rate
FY 2026/2027 Rates
(Unchanged from FY 2025/2026 Rates)
Safety Light Only $2.56/parcel
Street Light (single family residential) $15.32/parcel
Safety and Street Light (single family residential) $17.88/parcel Safety and Street Light (non-single family
residential)
$2.56/parcel + $0.2519 per linear foot of
frontage
Background and Analysis
Sacramento County created County Service Area No. 1 (CSA-1) to provide revenue to operate and maintain street and safety lights throughout the County. In June 2005, the City Council voted to begin the process of detaching from CSA-1 in an effort to improve levels of service on safety and street lighting within the City. In June 2006, the City completed the process by forming the CHLD and became fully responsible for operation and maintenance of all street and safety lights within the City.

ITEM 16
Subject: Citrus Heights Lighting District – Levy Assessments for Fiscal Year 26/27 Date: July 8, 2026

Page 4 of 5 ends

Specific maintenance responsibilities for the District are discussed in the Engineer’s Report, enclosed as Attachment 2.

The annual update and the levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 for the CHLD, proposed by the resolution, will fund operation and maintenance of street lights and safety lights, including the cost of electricity, replacement of bulbs and repair and replacement of damaged light poles, luminaires, and other related equipment.

Through ongoing analysis of the District, the City has substantially improved the level of service related to street light maintenance and operations, and fine-tuned the scope of the annual maintenance contract. In the past several years, continued efforts by staff have resulted in reductions to the annual expenses. Currently, a total of approximately 3,453 energy efficient LED lights (approximately 71.5% of the District’s total inventory) have been installed and/or converted from existing street lights. Efforts to install more efficient LED lighting and lower annual maintenance rates reduced the District’s total expenditures. However, repeated increases in electric utility rates, more frequent repair of aging street lighting equipment, and damages due to auto vehicular crashes have offset these cost savings resulting in a projected shortfall of approximately $113,590.72 for Fiscal Year 26/27. The increase of the number of safety lights included in the City’s Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs) and development projects have also added additional electricity and maintenance costs.

Staff continue to identify and evaluate additional measures to reduce District expenditures and offset rising electricity costs. In 2019, the City conducted a feasibility study evaluating the possibility to update various City-owned equipment and facilities with the goal of reducing energy costs. On April 8, 2020, the California Energy Commission (CEC) approved a low interest (1%) Energy Efficiency Loan for the implementation of an energy efficiency upgrade project consisting of a significant number of street light retrofits. In June 2021, a City-retained contractor began replacing existing street lights with LED fixtures, which was completed in October 2021. As a result of the LED upgrades, the City’s electrical bills from the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) decreased on average by 9.6% for the six-month period of December 2021 to May 2022 compared to the same timeframe the prior year.

In addition, LED conversions have become part of the regular maintenance program and staff continue to work with the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) to ensure accurate billings, including quantities, type, and wattages for the entire CHLD inventory. Monthly updates, LED conversions and changes are communicated to SMUD which are subsequently reflected in the monthly utility billings.

As part of the City’s ongoing effort to reduce costs, improve operational efficiency, and improve response times, the City added a Senior Traffic Signal and Lighting Technician in March 2026.

With this added capability, the City anticipates substantially reducing the scope of contracted unscheduled street light maintenance, including knockdown repairs and other corrective action.

This position will allow the City to perform the majority of routine street light maintenance and initial emergency response tasks in-house.

No major expansion of the existing system, except for improvements included in grant-funded transportation projects or new development projects, will be considered until additional revenues ITEM 16
Subject: Citrus Heights Lighting District – Levy Assessments for Fiscal Year 26/27 Date: July 8, 2026

Page 5 of 5 ends

are identified to support both the initial capital costs and the ongoing maintenance costs associated with system expansion.

Since the City assumed responsibility for the CHLD from Sacramento County in 2006, the District has operated with limited assessment revenue, and the City has implemented multiple cost-control measures, including LED conversions, maintenance contract refinements, and inventory verification for reduced maintenance costs where feasible. However, continued increases in utility rates, aging infrastructure repair needs, vehicle-related damage, and updated methods for allocating City overhead costs have contributed to the District’s ongoing funding shortfall. The underlying funding constraint is that the assessment rates, outlined in Fiscal Impact section above, have remained unchanged since 1996 when Proposition 218 was passed by the California voters, and any increase to assessment rates would require a vote of those assessed in compliance with the applicable Proposition 218 approval process.

On June 24, 2026, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention for the CHLD approving the Engineer’s Report, declaring its intention to order the annual update for Fiscal Year 2025/2027, to levy and collect assessments for the CHLD, and setting the time and date for the public hearing.

Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City must hold a public hearing on the matter for the CHLD. Since an increase in assessments is not proposed, the Code only requires the Notice to be published in a newspaper.

The Engineer’s Report proposes the assessment rates will not exceed the rate levied in Fiscal Year 2025/2026. No ballot procedure or special notice will be necessary to maintain these assessments. The Assessment District diagram and assessment rolls are contained in the Engineer’s Report.

Attachments

1. Resolution No. 2026-____ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, to confirm the diagram and assessment and to levy Fiscal Year 2026/2027 assessments for the Citrus Heights Lighting District.

2. Engineer’s Report
ITEM 16
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS

HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA, TO CONFIRM THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND TO LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027 ASSESSMENTS FOR THE

CITRUS HEIGHTS LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2026 the City Council (Council) of the City of Citrus Heights (City) adopted its Resolution No. 2026-50, initiating proceedings pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being California Streets and Highways Code Sections 22500 et seq. (Act), to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 in the City of Citrus Heights Lighting Assessment District;
WHEREAS, as directed by this Council, the City Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk a report for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 (the “Engineer’s Report”)in accordance with the Act;
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2026, the Council adopted its Resolution No. 2026-51, approving the Engineer’s Report, and setting a public hearing date of July 8, 2026, at 6:00 p.m., or soon after, at the Citrus Heights Council Chambers located at 6360 Fountain Square Drive, Citrus Heights, California 95621;
WHEREAS, a notice of the public hearing was published in the form, time, and manner required by law;
WHEREAS, the Engineer’s Report is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the Council duly heard all interested persons desiring to be heard.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights hereby declares that:

Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and the City Council so finds and determines.

Section 2. Approval of Engineer’s Report. This Council hereby approves the Engineer’s Report as now on file with the City Clerk.

Section 3. Improvements Ordered. This Council hereby orders the proposed improvements described in the Engineer’s Report to be made.

ITEM 16
Section 5. Confirmation of Assessment Diagram. This Council hereby confirms the diagram and the assessment now on file with it.

Section 8. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage.

The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 8th day of July, 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

MariJane Lopez-Taff, Mayor
ATTEST:

Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 16

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT
For
Citrus Heights Lighting District
Annual Update for Fiscal Year 2026/2027
Prepared by
Leslie Blomquist
City Engineer
June 24, 2026
ITEM 16
Citrus Heights Lighting District June 24, 2026
FY 2026/2027 Engineer’s Report Page i

CERTIFICATIONS

CITRUS HEIGHTS LIGHTING DISTRICT
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026/2027
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council.

DATED: ____________ __, 2026

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
By: __
Leslie Blomquist, P.E.

CITY ENGINEER
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment Rates and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the ________ day of ______________, 2026.

Amy Van, City Clerk
City of Citrus Heights,
Sacramento County, California
By:

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment Rates and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, on the _______________ day of __________________, 2026 Amy Van, City Clerk
City of Citrus Heights,
Sacramento County, California
By: ______________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment Rates and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Sacramento on the _______________ day of __________________, 2026.

Amy Van, City Clerk
City of Citrus Heights,
Sacramento County, California
By: ______________________________
June 18
ITEM 16
Citrus Heights Lighting District June 24, 2026
FY 2026/2027 Engineer’s Report Page ii
Page ii
Table of Contents
Section I: Overview ................................................................................................................................ 1 Contents of the Engineer’s Report ............................................................................................... 1 Introduction and Background ....................................................................................................... 1 Section II: Plans and Specifications ..................................................................................................... 2 General Description of the District .............................................................................................. 2 Description of Services and Improvements to Be Maintained ..................................................... 2 Section III: District Budget ................................................................................................................... 3 Proposed Fiscal Year Budget ........................................................................................................ 3 Description of Budget Items ......................................................................................................... 4 Section IV: Method of Apportionment ................................................................................................ 5 General .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Special Benefit Analysis ............................................................................................................... 6 Assessment Methodology ............................................................................................................. 6 Assessment Rates .......................................................................................................................... 8 Section V: Assessment Roll ................................................................................................................... 8 Section VI: Assessment Diagram ......................................................................................................... 8 Figure 1.1 ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Table 1.1 ................................................................................................................................................ 10 ITEM 16
Citrus Heights Lighting District June 24, 2026
FY 2026/2027 Engineer’s Report Page 1
Section I: Overview
Contents of the Engineer’s Report
This Report describes the District boundaries and the proposed improvements to be assessed to the property owners located within the District. The Report is made up of the following sections:

Section I: Introduction and Background – Provides a general introduction into the Report and provides background on the assessment.

Section II: Plans and Specifications – Contains a general description of the improvements that are maintained and serviced by the District.

Section III: Estimate of Costs – Identifies the cost of the maintenance and services to be provided by the District including incidental costs and expenses.

Section IV: Method of Apportionment – Describes the basis in which costs have been apportioned to lots and parcels within the District, in proportion to the special benefit received by each lot and parcel.

Section V: Assessment Roll – The assessment roll identifies the maximum assessment to be levied to each lot or parcel within the District.

Section VI: Assessment Diagram – Displays a diagram of the District showing the boundaries of the District.

For this Report, each lot or parcel to be assessed refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Parcel Number by the Sacramento County Assessor’s Office as shown on the last equalized roll of the assessor.

A. Introduction and Background
County Service Area 1 (CSA-1) was established in 1986 by the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors (Board) through the reorganizing of five existing street light maintenance districts. CSA-1 provided street light services to the unincorporated portions of Sacramento County as they existed in 1986. Since that time, the Cities of Citrus Heights, Elk Grove and Rancho Cordova have incorporated; however, responsibility for street light maintenance within these jurisdictions initially remained with CSA-1. On June 14, 2005, the County Board of Supervisors approved the creation of separate zones within CSA-1 corresponding to each incorporated city, with the City of Citrus Heights designated as CSA-1 Zone 3.

The City of Citrus Heights (City) incorporated on January 1, 1997. Between incorporation and the eventual transfer of CSA-1 Zone 3 responsibilities, City staff coordinated with County staff to facilitate street light maintenance by forwarding service requests from City residents to the County.

During this period, CSA-1 revenues remained essentially fixed due to the passage of Proposition 218 in 1996, while operating costs (electricity, labor, materials, etc.) continued to rise. As a result, CSA-1 reduced staffing levels, which in turn increased response times.

Recognizing that assuming local control of street light maintenance and assessments was essential to improving service levels, the Citrus Heights City Council adopted Resolution No. 2005-58 on June 22, 2005, formally notifying the County Board of Supervisors of the City’s intent to detach Zone 3 from CSA-1.

ITEM 16
Citrus Heights Lighting District June 24, 2026
FY 2026/2027 Engineer’s Report Page 2
Following coordinated efforts with CSA-1 and the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2006-63 on June 8, 2006, declaring its intent to form the Citrus Heights Lighting District. The process concluded on June 22, 2006, when the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2006-70, establishing the Citrus Heights Lighting District (CHLD or District) pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code §22500 (1972 Act). Formation of the CHLD in enabled the City to continue levying the direct assessments previously authorized under CSA-1. The City assumed all associated revenues and maintenance responsibilities from Sacramento County at the start of Fiscal Year 2006/2007.

This Engineer’s Report (Report) has been prepared pursuant to the 1972 Act (Part 2 of Division 15 Sections 22500 through 22679 of the Streets and Highways Code) and describes the District and the proposed annual assessments. The assessments are based on historical maintenance costs, current and projected energy rates, and comparable information from neighboring jurisdictions. Assessments will be levied on parcels that receive a special benefit from street light and highway safety lights, and each parcel is assessed proportionately to the special benefit it receives.

Section II: Plans and Specifications
A. General Description of the District
The boundaries of the Citrus Heights Lighting District are coterminous with the incorporated limits of the City of Citrus Heights (see Figure 1.1). Citrus Heights is located in the northernmost section of Sacramento County along Interstate 80 and encompasses approximately 14 square miles.

B. Description of Services and Improvements to be Maintained All lighting improvements and facilities maintained and serviced through District assessments are owned or operated by the City of Citrus Heights or the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD).

For purposes of this Report, lighting facilities are categorized into two types :

1. Highway Safety Lights - Lights located at intersections, along major roadways, and along the rear of parcels abutting major streets.

2. Street Lights - all other lighting not designated as Highway Safety Lights, generally servicing local residential and collector streets.

Maintenance and operational services are performed by City personnel, contractors, and SMUD.

District assessments provide funding for all Street and Highway Safety Lighting services within the City, including, but not limited to:
• Maintenance, repair and replacement of street light poles and fixtures, including lamp replacement, painting, photoelectric control repair or replacement, and repairs necessitated by vehicle collisions, vandalism, weathering, or normal wear. • Repair and replacement of electrical conduit, pull boxes, and related appurtenances damaged by construction activity, vehicle crashes, or environmental conditions. • Payment of electrical utility costs for the existing street light system. • Response to constituent and business inquiries and service requests related to street lighting.

ITEM 16
Citrus Heights Lighting District June 24, 2026
FY 2026/2027 Engineer’s Report Page 3
• Implementation of remedial projects involving major repairs or facility upgrades.

Engineering services are provided by City staff or by consultants. • Installation of Highway Safety Lights along major streets and at intersections for traffic-safety purposes. These installations typically occur as part of new signalized intersections funded through the City’s Capital Improvement Program for as conditions of development, with capital costs borne by the City of private developers.
• Creation and maintenance of the street light inventory database, including pole numbering, mapping, and condition tracking to support an effective maintenance and asset-management program.
• Acquisition of land, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for operation and maintenance of the Street and Highway Safety Lighting system.
• Administration of the District.

For purposes of this Report, maintenance refers to the provision of services and materials required for the ordinary and usual operation of the public lighting facilities, including repair, removal, or replacement of improvements or appurtenant components.

Service refers to the labor, materials, equipment, and utilities necessary to maintain and operate all public lighting facilities provided by the City.

Based upon current maintenance records, the combined number of Street Lights and Highway Safety Lights within the Citrus Heights Lighting District is 4,831.

Section III: District Budget
A. Proposed Fiscal Year Budget
Since assuming responsibility for the lighting district from Sacramento County in June 2006, the City has identified all revenue sources and established a comprehensive understanding of District expenditures. During this period, the City has significantly improved the level of service for street light and highway safety light maintenance and operations and refined contract administration procedures to minimize annual maintenance costs.

For the 2026/2027 Fiscal Year, special-assessment revenues are projected to fund the majority of the anticipated District expenditures. However, due to increased electrical power costs and ongoing repairs associated with aging infrastructure, a projected total shortfall of approximately $113,590.72.

Costs for contract unscheduled maintenance work (materials and repairs for damages due to knockdowns and aging infrastructure) are difficult to predict each year. For FY 2026/2027, the estimated costs for unscheduled maintenance work is projected to be $35,000.00. Cost recovery related to insurance settlements on street light knockdowns will be pursued as appropriate.

Over the past year, the City has continued converting existing fixtures and installing new energy efficient Light Emitting Diode (LED) fixtures through roadway improvement projects. As of this report, approximately 3,453 LED fixtures have been installed citywide, representing 71.5% of the District’s total inventory.

ITEM 16
Citrus Heights Lighting District June 24, 2026
FY 2026/2027 Engineer’s Report Page 4
Staff continues to evaluate and implement measures to reduce District expenditures and mitigate rising electricity costs. In 2019, the City conducted a feasibility study assessing opportunities to City-owned equipment and facilities to achieve long-term energy savings. On April 8, 2020, the California Energy Commission (CEC) approved a low interest (1%) Energy Efficiency Loan to support an energyefficiency upgrade project consisting of a substantial number of street light retrofits. In June 2021, a City-retained contractor initiated replacement of existing street lights with LED fixtures, which was completed in October 2021. Following the LED conversions, the City’s SMUD electrical bills decreased by an average of 9.6% during the six-month period from December 2021 to May 2022 compared to the same period the prior year.

Repayment of the CEC loan began in December 2022, and this expenditure is included in Table 1.1 at the end of this report. The biannual loan payment of $11,577.86 is funded through the energy savings realized from reduced utility costs. Upon completion of the 20-year repayment term, District expenditures will decrease by the amount of the annual loan obligation.

In March 2026, the City added a Senior Traffic Signal and Lighting Technician to enhance in-house capability as part of the ongoing effort to reduce costs, improve operational efficiency, and increase response times. With this added staffing, the scope of the existing contract for unscheduled street light maintenance (knockdowns and repairs) will be substantially reduced as this staff position will perform the majority of regular street light maintenance and initial emergency response tasks in-house.

In addition, staff continues to coordinate with SMUD to ensure accurate utility billings, including verification of fixture quantities, fixture types, and wattages for the entire District inventory. As street light fixtures are upgraded, SMUD updates the corresponding billings to reflect the changes revised in monthly utility billings.

No major expansion of the existing system, except when included in grant-funded transportation projects or new development, will be considered until additional revenue sources are identified to support both the initial capital investment and the ongoing operations and maintenance costs associated with system expansion.

The proposed District budget is summarized in the Budget Analysis shown on Table 1.1, which outlines the estimated costs to provide lighting improvements, associated administrative expenses, and the special benefit assessment (Balance to Levy).

B. Description of Budget Items
The following is a brief description of the various components of the District budget including the sources and uses of funds, which are included in Table 1.1.

Sources of Funds – Identifies the revenue sources used by the District to operate, maintain, and service the street light and safety light system. Funding sources may include interest earnings, special assessments, cost recovery revenues, and other supplemental contributions. • Interest on Fund Balance – Interest earnings accrued on the District’s fund balance. • Special Assessments – Revenue generated from assessments levied on parcels within the District that receive benefit from the street lights and highway safety lights.

ITEM 16
Citrus Heights Lighting District June 24, 2026
FY 2026/2027 Engineer’s Report Page 5
• Cost Recovery – Revenue received through insurance reimbursements and other recovery efforts associated with knockdowns or damage to street light and highway safety light infrastructure.
• Other Revenue – Contributions from the City’s General Fund or other supplemental sources used to offset expenditures that exceed annual assessment revenues.

Uses of Funds – Identifies the expenditures required to operate, maintain, and service the District’s lighting infrastructure. Costs may include labor, utilities, equipment, materials, supplies, repairs, replacements, and system upgrades necessary to properly maintain the assets that provide a direct benefit to the District.
• Electrical Costs – Includes the cost of electrical service for all street light facilities. For locations where SMUD retains maintenance responsibility, the associated maintenance charges are also included on the utility bill.
• Professional Services – Includes consultant services to verify assessor parcel information for all properties within the District and to incorporate new parcels into the annual assessment roll. Also includes assessment collection fees charged by the Sacramento County Assessor’s Office for collecting and remitting District assessments to the City, as well as Sacramento County fees for levying each parcel with the approved assessment. • Contract Maintenance (Scheduled) – Includes contracted labor for routine street light maintenance activities and the preparation and ongoing management of the street light inventory. Historically, these scheduled maintenance services were performed entirely by the City’s on-call electrical contractor. However; with the addition of the in-house Senior Traffic Signal and Lighting Technician in March of 2026, the need for contracted scheduled maintenance will be substantially reduced.
• Contract Maintenance (Unscheduled) – Includes contractor labor, equipment, and materials required to address unplanned repairs, including aging infrastructure failures, knock-down repairs and replacements, and other corrective work outside the scope of the scheduled monthly maintenance program.
• Construction – Funds allocated for special projects involving upgrades or modifications to street light and safety light infrastructure and associated facilities.

Section IV: Method of Apportionment
A. General
The 1972 Landscape and Lighting Act authorizes local agencies to form assessment districts for the construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing of public improvements, including street lighting systems, traffic signals, landscaping, parks and drainage facilities.

Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 22573, assessments for maintenance must be levied in proportion to the special benefit received, rather than based on the assessed value of the property. “The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels ITEM 16
Citrus Heights Lighting District June 24, 2026
FY 2026/2027 Engineer’s Report Page 6
in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
Section 22574 of the 1972 Act authorizes the establishment of zones of benefit within an assessment district if “by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements.” In addition, Article XIIID of the California Constitution and the Implementation Act require that a parcel’s assessment not exceed the reasonable cost for the proportional special benefit conferred to that parcel. Article XIIID and the Implementation Act further specify that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. They also require that publicly owned properties which specifically benefit from the improvements be assessed.

A. Special Benefit Analysis
All properties within the District receive a special benefit from the enhanced safety provided by Highway Safety Lights, which illuminate major roadways and intersections. This lighting improves driver visibility of traffic controls (stop signs, yield signs), street name signs, and pedestrians during nighttime conditions, and assists emergency service providers (police, fire, etc.) in locating properties within the District.

In addition to the Highway Safety Light special benefit, individual parcels may receive a parcelspecific special benefit from the presence of a Street Light located on or near the parcel which enhances safety/security in the area. For a parcel to receive this safety/security benefit from street lighting, fifty percent or more of the property’s frontage must be illuminated (based on the road width and spacing of the lights found in the County of Sacramento Improvement Standards). The Street Lighting service charge is apportioned only to those parcels that benefit directly from street lighting.

A distinction is made between residential and non-residential benefit parcels based on zoning. This results in a flat rate service charge on each residential benefit parcel and a service charge per front foot on each non-residential benefit parcel.

The formula used for calculating the District assessment reflects the composition of the parcels, the improvements and the services provided, and fairly proportions the costs based on special benefit to each parcel. Only parcels receiving benefit from Street Lights and Highway Safety Lights are assessed.

General Benefits
There are no general benefits related to Highway Safety Lights or Street Lights.

B. Assessment Methodology
When the original CSA-1 was established the assessment methodology was as follows:

Highway Safety Lighting – All properties are considered to benefit equally from Safety Lighting, as defined above in Special Benefit Analysis. As such, all parcels within CSA-1 were levied a flat rate calculated by the following formula:

Safety Light Maintenance Cost/Total Parcels = Levy per parcel ITEM 16
Citrus Heights Lighting District June 24, 2026
FY 2026/2027 Engineer’s Report Page 7
Street Lighting – Only properties that benefit from a street light are levied this assessment. Service charges for parcels that benefit from both safety and street lights are classified as residential parcels or non-residential parcels with separate services charges as follows:

Residential Parcels (Zoned RD1, RD2, RD3, RD4, RD5, RD7): The service charge for a residential parcel was levied utilizing the following formula:

Street Light Maintenance Cost * % of Residential lights / Residential Parcels = Levy per residential parcel
Non-Residential Parcels (all other zoning): The service charge for a residential parcel was levied utilizing the following formula:

Street Light Maintenance Cost * % of Non-Residential lights / Non- Residential Front Footage of Parcels = Levy per linear feet of non-residential front footage Levy per linear feet of non-residential front footage * Non-Residential Parcel Front Footage = Levy per Parcel
The passage of Proposition 218 in 1996 mandated that assessment increases must be approved by a two-thirds vote of the assessed property owners. As a result, the assessment rates for the Sacramento County’s CSA-1 were essentially frozen at the levels in effect at that time. These same rates remained in place and were carried over in 2006 upon creation of the Citrus Heights Lighting District, and have not increased since then. The current assessment methodology is therefore:

Highway Safety Lighting – All properties are considered to benefit equally from Safety Lighting, as defined above in Special Benefit Analysis. The service charge per parcel is equal to $2.56 per year.

Street Lighting – Only properties that benefit from a street light are levied this assessment. Service charges for parcels that benefit from both safety and street lights are classified as residential parcels or non-residential parcels with separate services charges as follows:

Residential Parcels (Zoned RD1, RD2, RD3, RD4, RD5, RD7): The service charge for a residential parcel is equal to $15.32 per year.

Non-Residential Parcels (all other zoning): The service charge for a non-residential parcel is equal to $0.2519 per linear foot length of the parcel’s public street frontage.

Exempt – Exempt from the assessment would be the areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County), dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights of ways including public greenbelts and parkways. Also exempt from assessment would be utility rights of ways, common areas (such as in condominium complexes), landlocked parcels, small parcels vacated by City/County, bifurcated lots, and any other property that cannot be developed.

These types of parcels have little or no value and therefore do not benefit from the improvements.

Land use classification for each parcel is based on the Sacramento County Assessor’s Roll. Zoning classification for each parcel is based on the City of Citrus Heights Zoning Map.

ITEM 16
Citrus Heights Lighting District June 24, 2026
FY 2026/2027 Engineer’s Report Page 8
C. Assessment Rates
The Fiscal Year 2026/2027 assessment rates for the District are proposed to remain the same as Fiscal Year 2025/2026. The following shows the assessments proposed to be levied:

Street Lighting
Residential (Zoned RD1, RD2, RD3, RD4, RD5, RD7) $15.32 per parcel Non-Residential (all other zones) $0.2519 per front foot Highway Safety Lighting
All parcels (except ‘Exempt’) $2.56 per parcel
Section V: Assessment Roll
Parcel identification for all lots or parcels within the District shall be based on the parcel information shown on the Sacramento County Assessor’s maps for the fiscal year in which this Report is prepared.

Non-assessable lots or parcels include all developed non-residential parcels, vacant parcels, government-owned and public utility-owned parcels, land principally encumbered with public rightsof-way and other tax-exempt parcels such as common areas or open space for which the County does not generate a tax bill. These parcels will not be assessed for the District improvements.

A listing of parcels assessed within this District, along with the proposed assessment amounts, is on file with the City Clerk and is incorporated by reference into this Report. Said listing of parcels to be assessed shall be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax roll for each parcel in FY 2026/2027. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be based on the method of apportionment and the assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

Section VI: Assessment Diagram
The boundaries of the District are coterminous with the boundaries of the City of Citrus Heights (see Figure 1.1).

ITEM 16
Citrus Heights Lighting District June 24, 2026
FY 2026/2027 Engineer’s Report Page 9
FIGURE 1.1
Lighting District Boundary

ITEM 16
Citrus Heights Lighting District June 24, 2026
FY 2026/2027 Engineer’s Report Page 10
TABLE 1.1
Citrus Heights Lighting District
Budget Analysis
DESCRIPTION FY 24/25
ACTUAL (6)
FY 25/26
ACTUAL*
FY 26/27

PROPOSED
BUDGET
SOURCES OF FUNDS:

Interest on Fund Balance $0.00 $64.04 $65.00
Special Assessments $339,063.00 $330,941.57 $334,000.00 Shared Maintenance Cost Reimbursement (1) $134.67 $112.82 $115.00 Total Sources of Funds: $339,197.67 $331,118.43 $334,180.00 USES OF FUNDS:

Advertising $759.25 $0.00 $800.00
Utilities (2) $247,981.53 $243,451.26 $244,000.00
CEC Loan Repayment (3) $23,155.72 $23,155.72 $23,155.72 Professional Services $10,223.54 $5,325.18 $5,500.00
Membership Dues $3,867.96 $4,454.78 $4,600.00
Contract Maintenance (Scheduled) (7) $90,511.80 $0.00 $0.00 Contract Maintenance (Unscheduled) (4) $112,198.55 $155,737.00 $35,000.00 Materials & Supplies (5) $0.00 $20,304.47 $45,000.00
New Construction $16,500.00 $0.00 $0.00
Cost Allocations 13,379.00 $13,112.00 $13,115.00
Salary Allocations (Streetlight Maintenance) (5) $0.00 $0.00 $76,600.00 Total Uses of Funds: $518,577.35 $465,540.41 $447,770.72 FUND BALANCE:

Beginning Fund Balance (July 1st) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Add Sources of Funds $339,197.67 $331,118.43 $334,180.00 Subtract Uses of Funds $518,577.35 $465,540.41 $447,770.72 Fund Shortfall: $(179,379.68) $(134,421.98) $(113,590.72) OTHER FUNDING SOURCES:

Measure A Maintenance Funds (Fund 210) to
cover District shortfall
$179,379.68 $134,421.98 $113,590.72
Ending Fund Balance (June 30th) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
* Actual Costs and Revenue for FY25/26 are subject to change and includes fiscal projections for work not yet invoiced. (1) The costs for four streets lights located on Antelope Road, near the I-80 Ramps, are shared with Caltrans (Caltrans reimburses the City for 50% of associated costs).
(2) Includes SMUD maintenance costs – Certain street lights are mounted on SMUD-owned power poles. The District reimburses SMUD for the operation and maintenance of these lights. (3) The City received a low interest (1%) Energy Efficiency Loan from the California Energy Commission (CEC) for capital costs to convert approximately 593 street lights to energy efficient models. Actual energy cost savings will be used to repay the loan. (4) Contract Maintenance (Unscheduled) work includes knock-downs, repairs & materials for aging infrastructure, etc. (5) In 2026, the City hired a Senior Traffic Signal & Lighting Technician. This position is responsible to perform in-house routine street light maintenance. This task now requires salary allocation and material procurement. (6) FY24/25 Actual Costs/Revenue updated since previous year Lighting District Engineer's Report and Staff Report. (7) Starting FY 25/26, the city changed the structure of the contract for street light maintenance. Previously, a set lump sum was paid monthly for "scheduled" repairs. The new contract eliminated the lump sum payment and all repairs are now classified as "unscheduled".

ITEM 16

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 8, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Regina Cave, General Services Director
Mary Poole, Operations Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution Confirming Report of Delinquent Solid Waste Charges and Ordering Collection of Delinquencies on the Property Tax Roll Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council:
1) Conduct a Public Hearing on the Report of Delinquent Solid Waste Charges; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2026-___, A Resolution of the City Council of Citrus Heights Confirming a Report of Delinquent Solid Waste Charges and Ordering Collection of Delinquencies on the Property Tax Roll.

Strategic Plan Alignment
This item is in alignment with the following City Council priority:

Goal: Maintain and Enhance Fiscal Stability While Supporting Operational Excellence.

Fiscal Impact
There is no impact to the FY 25-26 budget. This item is included in the annual solid waste budget.

Background and Analysis
Section 74-169 of the Municipal Code directs that solid waste charges be a lien against the property to which solid waste services are provided.

Government Code Sections 38790.1 and 25831 authorize the City to collect delinquent solid waste charges on the property tax roll. Delinquencies are charges that are at least three months overdue. Amounts on the property tax roll are collected by the County on the annual property tax bills in two equal installments that must be paid by December and April.

ITEM 17
Subject: Resolution Confirming Report of Delinquent Solid Waste Charges and Ordering Collection of Delinquencies on the Property Tax Roll
Date: July 08, 2026

Page 2 of 2 ends

A report of delinquencies was prepared by Republic Services and filed with the City Clerk. It lists amounts that were originally due on March 1, 2026 or earlier, and remained unpaid at the time the report was filed. By its Resolution No. 2026-040, adopted on June 10, 2026, the City Council declared its intention to collect delinquencies on the property tax roll and set a public hearing on the report of delinquencies for the July 8, 2026, City Council meeting. Staff mailed notice of the public hearing to each property owner listed on the report at least ten days prior to the scheduled public hearing. The purpose of the public hearing is to give affected property owners a chance to dispute their inclusion on the report (or the amount of the delinquency) before the amount is turned over to the County for collection on the property tax bill.

The original report as filed listed 1710 delinquent accounts, with a past due balance of $790,912.09 and penalties of $79,191.21 for a total of $870,003.30.

An updated report has been filed with the City Clerk to remove delinquencies that have been paid since the original report was produced. The attached resolution confirms that revised report.

The City Council may also make other changes to the report after hearing objections and protests at the public hearing,
It is possible that some payments will be made to Republic Services after the adoption of tonight’s resolution. If such payments are made prior to submission of the report to the County, staff and Republic Services will endeavor to remove the paid delinquencies from the report.

Attachments
1) Resolution No. 2026-_____ , a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights Confirming a Report of Delinquent Solid Waste Charges and Ordering Collection of Delinquencies on the Property Tax Roll
ITEM 17
RESOLUTION NO. 2026- ___

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS CONFIRMING A REPORT OF DELINQUENT

SOLID WASTE CHARGES AND ORDERING COLLECTION OF

DELINQUENCIES ON THE PROPERTY TAX ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 74-169 of the Municipal Code, solid waste charges constitute a lien against the property to which services are provided; WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 38790.1 and 25831 authorize the City to collect delinquent solid waste charges on the property tax roll; WHEREAS, a report of delinquencies, listing each delinquent parcel and the amount of its delinquency, has been prepared and placed on file in the Office of the City Clerk and made available for public inspection (the “Report’);
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2026, by its Resolution No. 2026-040 (the “Resolution of Intention”), the City Council declared its intention to collect delinquent solid waste fees on the property tax roll; WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention set July 8, 2026 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 6360 Fountain Square Drive, Citrus Heights as the time and place for a public hearing on the Report and any objections or protests to the Report (the “Public Hearing”); WHEREAS, notice of the Public Hearing and the filing of the Report was mailed to the landowners listed on the Report at least ten days prior to the date of the Public Hearing; WHEREAS, prior to the Public Hearing, a revised report of delinquencies was prepared to omit delinquencies that have been paid since the Report was originally prepared (the “Revised Report”):

WHEREAS, the Revised Report, which contains no additional delinquencies that were not also on the original Report, is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, available for public inspection, and incorporated herein by reference;
WHEREAS, at the appointed time and place, the City Council held the Public Hearing and heard objections and protests from all interested persons; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to confirm the Revised Report, without additional changes and to cause the delinquencies listed on the Revised Report to be collected by the County along with property taxes.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that:

1. Pursuant to Section 258319(c) of the Government Code, the City Council confirms the Revised Report without additional changes.

2. The City Council directs staff to file a certified copy of the Revised Report with the County Auditor for collection on the 2026-27 Property Tax Roll, and take any other action necessary to cause such collection.

ITEM 17

3. The delinquent charges (including penalties and interest) listed on the Revised Report shall constitute special assessments against the respective parcels of land and are a lien on the property for the amount of the delinquency. The assessment shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary county ad valorem property taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in case of delinquency as provided for those taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of county ad valorem property taxes shall be applicable to the assessment, except that if any real property to which the lien would attach has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of the taxes would become delinquent, then the lien that would otherwise be imposed by this section shall not attach to the real property and the delinquent fees, as confirmed, relating to the property shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection.

4. Staff is authorized to remove such items from the Revised Report as are paid prior to the submission of the Revised Report to the County.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 8th day of July, 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

MariJane Lopez-Taff, Mayor
ATTEST:

Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 17

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 8, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Meghan Huber, Economic Development & Community Engagement Director Alicia Aguirre, Management Analyst II Economic Development & Community Engagement
SUBJECT: Resolution Supporting the Nomination of Three Citrus Heights Census Tracts for an Opportunity Zone Designation
Recommendation
Staff recommend the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-___ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, supporting the nomination of three eligible Citrus Heights census tracts for Opportunity Zone 2.0 designation.

Strategic Plan Alignment
This item is aligned with the following City Council priority:

Goal: Diversify for a Vibrant Economy
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. If the nominations are approved, Opportunity Zone designation may encourage long-term private investment in the nominated census tracts, including major development areas such as Sunrise Tomorrow and Stock Ranch, through federal tax incentives. Increased investment could support economic development and generate additional property and sales tax revenues over time.

Background and Analysis
History of Opportunity Zones
The federal opportunity zone program was established through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 to encourage long -term private investment in economically distressed communities. Under the program, states nominate eligible census tracts which are then certified by U.S. department of the Treasury as Qualified Opportunity Zones. Investors who reinvest capital gains into qualifying projects located within a designated Opportunity Zone may be eligible for federal tax incentives.

ITEM 18
Subject: Opportunity Zones 2.0 Nomination
Date: July 8, 2026

Page 2 of 3 ends

California received 879 Opportunity Zone designations under the original 2018 program. Since then, communities across the state have used the designation as one of several economic development tools to help attract private investment and support redevelopment efforts.

Opportunity Zone designation does not provide direct funding or guarantee investment; rather, it serves as an additional financing tool that may make eligible areas more attractive for private investment.

Opportunity Zones 2.0
The original Opportunity Zone program was established as a temporary initiative, with designations scheduled to expire after 2026. In 2025, Congress permanently reauthorized the program and directed states to nominate a new set of Opportunity Zones beginning in 2026. As part of this process, California is seeking recommendations from local jurisdictions for eligible census tracts to be considered for designation effective January 1, 2027.

As part of the Opportunity Zones 2.0 designation process, the U.S. Department of the Treasury identified census tracts that meet updated federal eligibility criteria based on measures of economic distress, including median family income and poverty levels. Only census tracts identified by the U.S. Department of the Treasury as eligible may be nominated by the State.

California has 2,469 federally eligible census tracts. Under Opportunity Zones 2.0, the Governor may nominate up to 25 percent of those tracts (618 total) for designation by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
Eligible Census Tracts
Based on Treasury's eligibility list, three census tracts within Citrus Heights are eligible for nomination. These tracts are shown in Attachment 1 and listed in the table below. Because these are the only federally eligible census tracts within the city, staff recommend that all three be submitted to the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) for consideration.

Census Tract Number Development Opportunities
06067008139 Sunrise Mall
06067008136 Stock Ranch
06067008131 Greenback/Auburn
Census Tract 06067008139 – Sunrise MarketPlace Area
This census tract includes the Sunrise Mall property and surrounding commercial area, which is the focus of the Sunrise Tomorrow Specific Plan and the proposed Sunrise Sports Center.

Opportunity Zone designation may complement ongoing redevelopment efforts by providing an additional financing tool that could support future private investment.

Census Tract 06067008136 – Stock Ranch Area
This tract includes the Stock Ranch commercial area and surrounding employment uses including City Hall, Sam’s Club, and Safeway Shopping Centers. The area contains opportunities for commercial reinvestment and infill development that are consistent with the City's economic development objectives.

ITEM 18
Subject: Opportunity Zones 2.0 Nomination
Date: July 8, 2026

Page 3 of 3 ends

Census Tract 06067008131 – Greenback and Auburn Area
This tract encompasses an established commercial shopping center anchored by Grocery Outlet and Petco. The tract contains commercial properties with potential for future reinvestment and infill development. Opportunity Zone designation may enhance the tract’s competitiveness for eligible private investment projects.

Environmental Review
This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) (the "common sense" exemption). Adoption of the proposed Resolution supporting the Opportunity Zone nomination is an administrative action that will not result in any direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical changes to the environment.

Attachments

1. Map of Census Tracts Eligible for Opportunity Zone 2.0 Nomination

2. Resolution No. 2026- ____ Supporting the Nomination of Eligible Census Tracts for Opportunity Zone 2.0 Designation
ITEM 18
Baseline Rd
Antelope Rd
80 KASEBERG-KINGSWOOD

VINEYARD

CRESTHAVEN

JUNCTION
WEST

RUSCH PARK
CHANT
Antelope
San Juan Ave
Hillsdale Blvd
E14

HAGGIN PARK

DEL PASO
VALE
Foothill Farms
Citrus Heights
Douglas
E3
E2
80 HILLCREST

JOHNSON
RANCH

OLYMPUS
POINTE

CIRBY SIDE

LEAD HILL

SIERRA VISTA
SIERRA

GARDENS

SOUTH CIRBY

CHASE SOUTH

SYLVAN OLD
AUBURN
ROAD

SUNRISE
RANCH
Orangevale
Roseville
230 ft
Madison Ave
Sunset Ave
E3

BIRDCAGE

HEIGHTS
Fair Oaks
July 02, 2026 © 2026 Esri
Citrus Heights, CA
Proposed census tracts
ITEM 18
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS,

CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE NOMINATION OF ELIGIBLE CENSUS TRACTS FOR OPPORTUNITY ZONE 2.0 DESIGNATION

WHEREAS, the City of Citrus Heights seeks to create conditions that encourage private investment and reinvestment to advance economic opportunity, strengthen the local economy, and support reinvestment in key commercial areas, consistent with the City’s Economic Development Work Plan; and
WHEREAS, federal law authorizes the State of California to nominate eligible census tracts for Opportunity Zone 2.0 designation, providing federal tax incentives intended to encourage longterm private investment in designated communities; and WHEREAS, the City of Citrus Heights has identified three eligible census tracts that align with the City's Economic Development Workplan and Council Strategic Objectives by encompassing key redevelopment areas, commercial corridors, and infill investment opportunities; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that submitting these nominations is in the best interest of the City and its residents; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights does hereby approves the nomination of Census Tracts 06067008139, 06067008136, and 06067008131 for submission to the State of California for consideration as California Opportunity Zones 2.0.

The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 8th day of July 2026 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

MariJane Lopez-Taff, Mayor
ATTEST:

Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 18

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 8, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Susan Talwar, Administrative Services Director
Melissa Rojas, Human Resources Manager
SUBJECT: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-of-Living Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; and Amendments to the Employer Contribution Level for Employee Health Benefits
The staff report and resolutions for this item will be provided to the City Council and posted to the City website under separate cover on Monday, July 6, 2026.

ITEM 19

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 8, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager
FROM: Susan Talwar, Administrative Services Director
Melissa Rojas, Human Resources Manager
SUBJECT: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-of-Living Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; and Amendments to the Employer Contribution Level for Employee Health Benefits.

Summary and Recommendation
The most recent Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) which serve as labor agreements between the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association (CHPOA), the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association (CHPEA) and the City of Citrus Heights covered the period October 1, 2023 to June 30, 2026. Pursuant to the City Council’s direction, the City’s labor negotiation representatives met and conferred with representatives of both the CHPOA and CHPEA in good faith over the past several months concerning successor Memorandums of Understanding. In addition, and in accordance with the City’s compensation policy, a comprehensive review, including a total compensation study, was commissioned by a third party expert to evaluate market competitiveness relative to employee retention and recruitment. The findings served to inform recommendations relative to addressing total compensation with select market equity and benefit adjustments for unrepresented employees. The last comprehensive total compensation study the City completed was in 2023.

Staff recommends City Council approve the following:
1) Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-___, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights adopting a Memorandum of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association.

The CHPOA and City labor representatives have bargained in good faith and reached a tentative agreement regarding a successor MOU on June 25, 2026. The CHPOA voted to ratify the successor MOU on June 26, 2026.

ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 2 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
2) Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-___, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, adopting a Memorandum of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association.

The CHPEA City labor representatives have bargained in good faith and reached tentative agreement regarding a successor MOU on July 1, 2026. The CHPEA voted to ratify the successor MOU on July 3, 2026.
3) Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-___, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, adopting the amended Salary Table, with Cost-of-Living Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments. 4) Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-__, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, Adopting the Amendments to the Employer Contribution Level for Employee Health Benefits.

A MESSAGE FROM CITY MANAGER FEENEY
Aligning Resources and Priorities
At its core, local government is a service organization where dedicated professionals deliver the essential services residents and businesses rely on every day. Our employees are the foundation of that work, and supporting their success is essential to fulfilling the City's mission and advancing the City Council's Strategic Goals and Objectives.

To maintain a competitive workforce, the City periodically commissions independent compensation studies conducted by third-party experts. The 2026 study compared Citrus Heights' compensation with similar public agencies and provides the objective foundation for the recommendations presented in this report. Competitive compensation is one of the City's primary tools for retaining and attracting the talented employees who deliver the reliable, high-quality public services our community depends on.

Our commitment to investing in our people is inseparable from our responsibility to be thoughtful stewards of public resources. Fiscal stewardship means making proactive decisions that align community priorities, service delivery, and available resources to deliver the greatest possible benefit to the community. Across California, local governments are facing growing fiscal pressure as inflation, rising operating costs, and increasing service demands continue to outpace revenue growth. Many communities are now confronting structural budget deficits that require significant core service reductions, deferred maintenance, and other difficult corrective actions. Citrus Heights faces many of the same financial pressures. Sales tax revenues have consistently fallen short of earlier forecasts, property tax growth remains relatively flat, and no significant new revenue sources are on the horizon. At the same time, the cost of delivering the quality public services our community expects continues to increase. As fiscal conditions evolve, the City's compensation strategy must evolve as well. During the 2023–2025 compensation cycle, the City successfully positioned salaries at the market median to strengthen retention and recruitment. This balanced approach means many comparator agencies continue to offer higher ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 3 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
compensation while some offer less, positioning Citrus Heights as competitive without leading the market. Given today's fiscal realities, staff is recommending a more conservative approach to this cycle by positioning salaries within five percent (5%) of the market median; a level that remains competitive and invests in our people while mindful of the City's long-term financial sustainability.

Compensation recommendations cannot be considered in isolation. To responsibly accommodate these proposed recommendations within the City's long-term financial plan, staff undertook a comprehensive review of the City's service delivery model. The review was guided by the same principles reflected throughout the City's budget preparation and adoption: preserving core services, improving organizational efficiency, prioritizing investments that deliver the greatest community value, and ensuring limited public resources are directed where they have the greatest impact. Programs, organizational structures, staffing models, and service delivery approaches were evaluated to identify opportunities to create capacity for these recommendations while maintaining the City's fiscal prudence. The recommendations presented in this report extend well beyond compensation and into a broader organizational strategy and ongoing commitment to align community priorities, service delivery, and finite available resources. This strategy is intended to address today's fiscal challenges, but preserving core services and maintaining long-term financial sustainability will require continued fiscal discipline, thoughtful decision-making, and a willingness to adapt as economic conditions evolve.

Every service the City provides begins with the people who deliver it. Every day, City employees bring professionalism, expertise, and a commitment to public service that improves the quality of life for our community. I am sincerely grateful for our staff’s dedication and the work they do on behalf of our residents, businesses, and visitors. Our responsibility is to support our workforce while serving as responsible stewards of the public's trust and resources. These recommendations reflect that commitment by balancing investments in our employees with the City's long-term financial sustainability. By aligning resources with community priorities, these recommendations help position Citrus Heights to continue delivering core public services while preserving the flexibility to respond to future opportunities and challenges.

Executive Summary
The City of Citrus Heights runs an efficient staffing model that relies on skilled, productive, effective staff that have experience in their field. Across all disciplines, it is important to retain and attract well-qualified employees to address complex work that can have major consequences if not executed properly. Effective retention and recruitment is a key endeavor and goal relative to achieving efficient service delivery models. Highly qualified employees are important to ensuring work is executed in an efficient manner with high standards of service delivery.

In addition to service delivery, effective retention and recruitment are essential to responsible financial management. There is considerable cost relative to recruitment, backgrounds and medical clearances, and the staff resources needed to onboard and train a new employee. For ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 4 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
instance, the cost to hire a new police officer includes a six-month paid academy and approximately one year of field training. An entry-level police officer is not able to work on their own until approximately one year after their hire date.

In effort to minimize future pension liability costs, a fiscally prudent strategy of increasing medical contribution rates was deployed to help increase total compensation versus looking at solving predominantly with salary which would significantly increase future pension liability.

This also helps address the concerns about growing medical employee contribution costs that have occurred over the years. After addressing the medical contribution rate (which helped bring many positions up to median), select market equity adjustments are recommended to ensure positions do not fall more than 5% below the labor market median. A cost-of-living increase equal to the April 12-month Consumer Price Index (CPI) of three and eight-tenths (3.8%) percent for all employee classifications is also recommended.

The City’s financial model has included cost-of-living adjustments in the forecast. The compounding effect of budgeting the compensation adjustments associated with bringing all positions to within 5% of market median of comparable agencies requires a careful examination of the organization and core service delivery to ensure the fiscal impact of the recommended adjustments are accounted for. With the structural reorganization described below and the elimination of the associated positions, the proposed budget adjustments still maintain reserve balances well above the City Council minimum reserve policy when applied to the Long Range Financial Model. Keeping up with cost of living adjustments in the future will help ensure that the City does not fall into a position where adjustments to this depth are needed to stay competitive in the marketplace.

This week, the City implemented a structural reorganization to maximize operational efficiencies while better aligning operational responsibilities and provided new supervisory clarity. Under this reorganization, Animal Services will transition from the Police Department to the General Services Department, where existing operational infrastructure more effectively supports its community centered programs. One existing Police Services Manager position will be reclassified to a Police Communications Manager to more appropriately align the classification with the scope and responsibilities of the job and organizational needs. Additionally, as part of the organizational adjustments, a Community Services Officer was reclassified to Program Technician, reflecting evolving departmental needs. Within the Police Department, the Records Unit and the Code Enforcement Unit will each report to separate Police Lieutenants, ensuring focused oversight and improved workflow management. These changes eliminate the operational need for the non-sworn, professional staff positions of the Police Services Supervisor and Police Services Manager classifications. Accordingly, three positions have been eliminated and will be removed from the authorized Full Time Employee count.

In addition to the organizational realignments described above, the City must also respond to the reality that forecasted revenues are not keeping pace with the rising cost of delivering public services. As part of its fiscal stewardship approach, the City must prioritize core service delivery, ensuring finite resources remain focused on the functions residents rely upon most. Within the ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 5 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
Police Department, patrol operations and investigations represent core public safety services. A dedicated traffic enforcement team provides value to the community but is considered an enhanced service level beyond the Department's core operational responsibilities. As the City works to remain competitive in attracting and retaining the workforce needed to deliver essential public services, rising personnel costs and constrained revenue growth require careful prioritization of available resources.

Accordingly, the Police Department Traffic Unit will be eliminated. The officers currently assigned to the Traffic Unit will be reassigned to Patrol to strengthen core service delivery. Four vacant Police Officer positions will be eliminated from the authorized staffing plan, and the reassigned Police Sergeant will support patrol operations through the end of the calendar year.

Thereafter, both the Traffic Sergeant position and one Police Lieutenant position will be eliminated through attrition as future vacancies occur, avoiding the need for a reduction in force among sworn personnel and reducing the authorized staffing plan accordingly.

Collectively, these organizational changes improve operational efficiency, align staffing resources with the City's highest service priorities, and reduce the compounding effect of personnel costs on the City's long-term financial outlook. These adjustments represent approximately 4% of the City's 215 FTE budgeted positions. By proactively managing staffing levels through organizational restructuring and attrition, the City avoids a structural deficit, preserves financial flexibility, protects reserves, and strengthens its ability to respond to future community needs.

Staff is recommending approval of the successor Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) with the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association (CHPOA) and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association (CHPEA), adoption of an updated Salary Schedule reflecting cost-of-living and market equity adjustments, and revisions to the City’s employer health benefit contribution levels.

Fiscal Impact
To implement the proposed compensation adjustments for unrepresented employees, CHPOA, and CHPEA, staff is recommending a General Fund budget amendment of $1.11 million in FY 2026/27. These costs include negotiated and proposed salary adjustments, medical benefit increases, and an additional 1.3% COLA to the budgeted 2.5% (total 3.8%) for FY 2026/27.

Staff has incorporated these compensation costs, along with the fiscal impacts of the proposed organizational restructuring, into the Long Range Financial Forecast while maintaining the City's minimum target reserve levels. Assuming all authorized unrepresented positions are filled, the cost to implement the proposed salary and medical adjustments for unrepresented employees is $805,265 in FY 2026/27 and $1.19 million in FY 2027/28. The estimated cost of implementing the CHPOA Memorandum of Understanding is $966,787 in FY 2026/27 and $1.45 million in FY 2027/28. The estimated cost of implementing the CHPEA Memorandum of Understanding is $242,469 in FY 2026/27 and $388,289 in FY 2027/28.

ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 6 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
To help offset these increased personnel costs, the proposed organizational restructuring is expected to generate an expenditure savings of $974,645 in FY 2026/27 and $1.24 million in FY 2027/28. These savings reduce the ongoing fiscal impact of the compensation adjustments by eliminating or restructuring positions and improving organizational efficiencies. As a result, the City is able to implement market equity, cost-of-living, and benefit adjustments, maintaining a competitive position in the regional market while preserving long-term financial sustainability and maintaining its minimum General Fund reserve targets.

Background
Employee compensation is periodically reviewed to ensure the City remains competitive in attracting and retaining highly qualified employees while maintaining long-term fiscal responsibility. Compensation adjustments may result from negotiated Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), total compensation studies, labor market analyses, organizational needs, or City Council policy direction.

Compensation for represented employees is established through the collective bargaining process and memorialized in negotiated MOUs. Compensation for unrepresented employees is established by the City Council upon recommendation of the City Manager and is typically reviewed following completion of negotiations with the City's recognized bargaining units to maintain market competitiveness and appropriate internal salary relationships.

The City's Salary Schedule is the official public record establishing the salary range assigned to each authorized classification. The Salary Schedule is separate from MOUs, employment agreements, compensation plans, or personnel policies, which establish the terms and conditions under which employees are compensated. While those actions authorize compensation changes, they do not, by themselves, amend the City's official Salary Schedule.

Following approval of compensation adjustments, the Salary Schedule must be updated to accurately reflect the authorized salary ranges for each classification. California Code of Regulations, Title 2, section 570.5 requires CalPERS contracting agencies to maintain a publicly available pay schedule that identifies each classification, its corresponding salary or salary range, applicable time base, effective date, and that has been duly approved and adopted by the agency's governing body. Adoption of the revised Salary Schedule is therefore necessary to implement the approved compensation actions, ensure compliance with CalPERS compensation reporting requirements, and maintain the City's official record of authorized salary ranges.

Analysis
Memorandum of Understanding between Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association (CHPOA) and the City of Citrus Heights
The CHPOA is the exclusive collective bargaining representative for the City’s Sworn Police Officer and Police Sergeant classifications. The City and CHPOA representatives began the meet ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 7 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
and confer process in April for the purpose of agreeing to a successor MOU. The City’s labor negotiation representatives met and conferred in good faith with the Association’s representatives on numerous occasions to respond to proposals and present counter-proposals.

On June 25, 2026, the parties reached agreement on the provisions of a successor MOU which was subsequently voted on and ratified by the Association’s members on June 26, 2026.

The following is a summary of the changes incorporated into the successor MOU:
• Term: July 1, 2026 – June 30, 2028
• Salaries:

o Effective July 12, 2026, or the first full pay period after adoption of the Memorandum of Understanding, whichever is later:
 3.8% COLA for all represented classifications; and
 Market equity adjustments to bring classifications within 5% of market median:
a. Police Officer – 1.77%
b. Police Sergeant – 1.08%
o Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2027, COLA between two and three percent (2% - 3%) based on April 12-month CPI-U San Francisco/San Jose/Hayward for all members.
• City Medical Plan Contribution – Effective August 1, 2026:
o Employee Only – up to $1,150 per month
o Employee Plus One – up to $2,350 per month
o Employee Plus Two or More – up to $ 3,050 per month
• Various Non-Economic Contract Provision Updates:
o Section 10.3 - Internal Affairs
o Section 11.2 – Overtime
o Sections 13.3 – 13.6 – Specialty Assignment Pay
o Section 14.1 – Court Standby
o Article 21 – Personnel Files
o Section 23.1 – Annual Leave
o Article 26 – On Duty Workout Program
Staff recommend ratification of the successor MOU by the City Council. If approved, the salary adjustments effective July 12, 2026, have been incorporated into the updated Salary Schedule.

ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 8 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
Memorandum of Understanding between Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association (CHPEA) and the City of Citrus Heights
The CHPEA is the exclusive collective bargaining representative for the City’s non-sworn police specific classifications of Community Services Officer, Crime Scene/Property and Evidence Specialist, Police Records Assistant, Police Dispatcher, Police Crime Analyst, Code Enforcement Officer, and Animal Services Officer. The City and CHPEA representatives began the meet and confer process in April for the purpose of agreeing to a successor MOU. The City’s labor negotiation representatives met and conferred in good faith with the Association’s representatives on numerous occasions to respond to proposals and present counter-proposals.

On July 1, 2026, the parties reached agreement on the provisions of a successor MOU which was subsequently voted on and ratified by the Association’s members on July 3, 2026.

The following is a summary of the changes incorporated into the successor MOU:
• Term: July 1, 2026 – June 30, 2030
• Salaries:
o Effective July 12, 2026, or the first full pay period after adoption of the Memorandum of Understanding, whichever is later:
 3.8% COLA for all represented classifications; and
 Market equity adjustments to bring classifications within 5% of market median:
a. Community Services Officer I/II/Senior – 0.77%
b. Crime Scene/Property Evidence Specialist I/II/Senior – 0.77% c. Police Crime Analyst – 1.11%
o Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2027, COLA between two and four percent (2% - 4%) based on April 12-month CPI-U San Francisco/San Jose/Hayward for all members.
o LIMITED REOPENER: Prior to July 1, 2028, the City and the Association agree to meet and confer regarding: (1) Section 11.4 (Salary Adjustments), as it specifically relates to potential Market Equity adjustments; and (2) Section 25.1 (Health Benefit), as it specifically relates to the City’s maximum contribution to an employee’s health plan.
o Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2028, COLA between two and four percent (2% - 4%) based on April 12-month CPI-U San Francisco/San Jose/Hayward for all members.

ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 9 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
o Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2029, COLA between two and four percent (2% - 4%) based on April 12-month CPI-U San Francisco/San Jose/Hayward for all members.
• City Medical Plan Contribution – Effective August 1, 2026:
o Employee Only – up to $1,150 per month
o Employee Plus One – up to $2,350 per month
o Employee Plus Two or More – up to $ 3,050 per month
• In-Lieu of Medical Plan – Effective August 1, 2026:
o If an employee has proof of qualifying outside health insurance coverage, provide $800 per month ($600 plus $200 to an employee’s Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) or deferred compensation account).
• Various Non-Economic Contract Provision Updates:
o Article 11 – Overtime (cleanup language)
o Article 13 – Special Compensation (cleanup language)
o Article 14 – Education (cleanup language)
Staff recommend ratification of the successor MOU by the City Council. If approved, the salary adjustments effective July 12, 2026, have been incorporated into the updated Salary Schedule.

Unrepresented Employees
A competitive compensation program is essential to retaining and attracting highly qualified employees, maintaining organizational stability, and ensuring the continued delivery of highquality public services. The City’s compensation philosophy is founded on three guiding principles: fiscal sustainability, internal equity, and market competitiveness. Historically, the City has targeted total compensation at approximately the median of its established labor market.

Because labor market conditions, economic factors, and employee benefit costs continually evolve, the City’s compensation program is periodically evaluated to ensure it remains aligned with these principles. The last total compensation review was completed in 2023.

Staff recently completed a comprehensive review of the City's compensation program, including an analysis of labor market conditions, recruitment and retention trends, internal salary relationships, and the City's long-term financial outlook. Based on this review, staff recommends adoption of a four-year compensation plan for unrepresented employees. In developing the recommendation, staff considered several factors, including:
• Results of the City's total compensation survey;
• Recruitment and retention data, including employee turnover and vacancy rates; ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 10 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
• Internal salary equity among classifications;
• Forecasted revenues and long-term financial sustainability; • Regional economic conditions and inflationary pressures; and • The compensation provisions contained in recently negotiated Memoranda of Understanding with the City's bargaining units.

Total Compensation Survey and the City’s Target Market Positioning To evaluate the City’s market position, the City retained Bryce Consulting, Inc. (“Bryce Consulting”) to conduct an external labor market total compensation survey. Bryce Consulting was formed in July 1995 to provide human resources consulting services to public, private, and non-profit clients and is considered an expert in the industry. The City’s identified labor market is comprised of agencies that compete for the same labor pool while also sharing similar organizational characteristics. The typical elements used to determine the labor market include, but are not limited to, geographic labor market, population served, organization size, services provided, labor market competition, economic characteristics, classification comparability, governance structure, and historical comparator agencies. For 2026, the City’s labor market consisted of: City of Davis, City of Folsom, City of West Sacramento, City of Rancho Cordova, City of Rocklin, and City of Woodland, City of Roseville, City of Elk Grove, City of Sacramento, and County of Sacramento.

The comprehensive total compensation survey evaluated: base pay, deferred compensation employer contributions, education and certification pay, longevity pay, health, dental, vision, life insurance, and long-term disability employer contributions, retirement health savings employer contributions, social security (FICA and Medicare) employer contributions, minus employer retirement costs paid by employees. Position comparability was verified through review of job descriptions and organizational information.

In accordance with industry best practices, the survey included benchmark classifications that represent the journey-level positions within each major occupational group. Benchmark classifications are positions that are common among comparable agencies and can be reliably matched based on duties, responsibilities, and minimum qualifications. Because not every City classification has a direct counterpart in the labor market, compensation studies do not typically survey every position. Rather, the benchmark classifications serve as the foundation for evaluating market competitiveness, while the remaining classifications are aligned through the City's established internal compensation structure to preserve appropriate salary relationships, promotional differentials, and organizational equity.

The survey results were evaluated using the City's compensation philosophy of maintaining total compensation within five percent of the median of the identified labor market. The analysis also incorporated the City's proposed increase to its employer contribution toward employee health insurance, recognizing that employer-paid benefits are a component of total compensation. After accounting for the enhanced medical contribution and applying the City's five percent market objective, some benchmark classifications were within the City's desired competitive range, ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 11 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
while others fell below this threshold. The benchmark classifications that are below the City’s targeted market positioning, are as follows:

Classification % Below Target
Market Positioning
Maintenance Worker I -7.25%
General Services Director -6.38%
Administrative Services Director -6.21%
Community Development Director -5.79%
Chief Building Official -3.78%
Administrative Assistant -3.68%
Economic Development and Community Engagement Director -2.50% Human Resources Manager -2.40%
Information Technology Analyst II -2.26%
Police Commander -1.81%
Building Inspector II -1.77%
Construction Maintenance Inspector II -1.49%
Information Technology Manager -1.04%
Police Lieutenant -0.81%
Associate Civil Engineer -0.28%
As a result, staff recommends providing market equity adjustments for these benchmark classifications. Although only benchmark classifications were directly compared to the external labor market, staff reviewed all City classifications during the development of the recommended compensation plan. Non-benchmark classifications were evaluated relative to the benchmark positions using established internal compensation relationships, classification hierarchy, scope of responsibility, supervisory structure, and career progression to ensure the recommendations maintain both external competitiveness and internal equity. Those classifications that are aligned to the benchmark classifications will also receive the recommended market equity adjustments.

Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA)
In addition to market equity adjustments, staff also recommends providing an annual cost-ofliving adjustment (COLA) of 3.8% for all eligible unrepresented classifications, which is intended to recognize and address inflationary changes as measured by the April 12-month percent changes to the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward. Table 1 illustrates the April 2026 CPI-U increased overall by

3.8% over the last 12 months:

ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 12 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
Table 1
City Medical Plan Contribution
Health insurance premiums have increased by approximately 30% since the last comprehensive review, while the City’s employer contribution has remained unchanged, resulting in a decline in the City’s total compensation position relative to the market. As such, staff recommends an increase to the City’s maximum contribution to the medical plan, as follows:
• Employee only – up to $1,150 per month (currently: $925) • Employee Plus One – up to $2,350 per month (currently: $1,850) • Employee Plus Two or More – up to $ 3,050 per month (currently: $2,375) Contributions for benefit-eligible part-time employees are pro-rated on the assigned benefit tier (e.g., 50%, 75%) in accordance with current city policy.

If an employee has proof of qualifying outside health insurance coverage, the City currently provides a medical plan opt-out benefit of $700 per month ($600 plus $100 to an employee’s Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) or deferred compensation account). To remain competitive, staff recommends increasing this amount to $800 per month ($600 plus $200 to an employee’s Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) or deferred compensation account).

These increases will apply to both unrepresented and CHPEA employee groups, while POA employees will receive a maximum contribution of $700 per month consistent with the MOU their membership approved.

Together, the recommended adjustment of the City’s target market positioning, cost-of-living adjustments, market equity increases, and health insurance contribution and medical plan opt-out adjustments support the City’s long-standing compensation philosophy of maintaining a fiscally sustainable, internally equitable, and market-competitive total compensation program. In addition, these recommendations for unrepresented employees are consistent with the salary and benefit adjustments provided to represented employees.

Temporary, Seasonal, Extra-Help, and On-Call Classifications Temporary, seasonal, extra-help and on-call classifications are typically set to State of California minimum wage and/or internally aligned to other classifications (i.e., a percentage above, a ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 13 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
percentage below, or equal to). The Human Resources Division evaluates and maintains the internal alignment differentials. No changes are being recommended to the current alignment of pay rates for these classifications. Accordingly, the updated salary schedule reflects adjustments to these classifications to maintain the current internal alignment and/or updates to minimum wage.
2027 - 2030 Compensation Plan for Unrepresented Employees The proposed compensation plan provides scheduled salary adjustments for eligible unrepresented employee classifications. The recommended adjustments are based on the City's total compensation philosophy, which seeks to maintain employee compensation within five percent of the median of the City's adopted labor market, while recognizing the importance of maintaining appropriate internal relationships among classifications. The compensation plan will be maintained by the Administrative Services Department Human Resources Division and is subject to approval by the City Council through the adoption of the biennial operating budget, including any mid-year and/or midcycle adjustments. If approved, the compensation plan will include the following:

Summary of Recommendations for Unrepresented Employees
• Effective July 12, 2026:
o 3.8% COLA for eligible classifications; and
o Market equity adjustments to bring classifications within 5% of market median. • City Medical Plan Contribution – Effective August 1, 2026:
o Employee Only – up to $1,150 per month
o Employee Plus One – up to $2,350 per month
o Employee Plus Two or More – up to $ 3,050 per month
• In-Lieu of Medical Plan – Effective August 1, 2026:
o If an employee has proof of qualifying outside health insurance coverage, provide $800 per month ($600 plus $200 to an employee’s Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) or deferred compensation account).
• 2027 - 2030 Compensation Plan for Unrepresented Employees o Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2027, COLA between two and four percent (2% - 4%) based on April 12-month CPI-U San Francisco/San Jose/Hayward.

ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 14 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
o Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2028, COLA between two and four percent (2% - 4%) based on April 12-month CPI-U San Francisco/San Jose/Hayward.
o Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2029, COLA between two and four percent (2% - 4%) based on April 12-month CPI-U San Francisco/San Jose/Hayward.

The proposed plan establishes a predictable compensation framework while preserving the City Council's authority to modify future adjustments if significant changes in economic conditions, revenues, or organizational priorities warrant reconsideration. Staff incorporated the fiscal impacts of the recommended compensation adjustments into the long-range financial forecast to remain competitive while preserving long-term financial sustainability.

If approved, the salary adjustments effective July 12, 2026 have been incorporated into the updated Salary Schedule.

Updated Position Control Listing Due to Organizational Restructure As a result of the organizational restructuring and associated reduction in force discussed in this report, the position control listing will be modified as follows:

Classification Current FTE
Authorization
Proposed FTE
Authorization
FTE Change
Police Officer 69.0 65.0 -4.0
Police Sergeant (2028) 12.0 11.0
(eliminate 1.0 FTE
through attrition)
-1.0
Police Lieutenant (2028) 6.0 5.0
(eliminate 1.0 FTE
through attrition)
-1.0
Police Services Supervisor 2.0 - -2.0
Police Services Manager 2.0 - -2.0
Police Communications Manager - 1.0 +1.0
Total -9.0 FTE
FTE = Full-Time Equivalent
The elimination of the Police Services Supervisor and Police Services Manager classifications, along with the proposed salary range for the newly created position of Police Communications Manager is reflected in the updated Salary Schedule. In addition, the Police Lieutenant and Police Sergeant positions are projected to eliminate by attrition by 2028 as part of the organizational restructuring.

Updated Salary Schedule
ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 15 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
The proposed resolution adopting the revised Salary Schedule is administrative in nature and implements compensation actions previously approved, or being considered concurrently, by the City Council. In addition to reflecting the approved compensation adjustments, the revised Salary Schedule establishes the new Program Technician classification to align with the Program Assistant career progression and support the assignment of expanded responsibilities. The Fleet Technician position was eliminated, and the full-time equivalent was reclassified as Maintenance Worker to more effectively meet the requirements of the Fleet and Facilities division. Adoption of the Salary Schedule codifies the City's authorized salary ranges into a single official document that satisfies applicable CalPERS regulatory requirements. Accordingly, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the accompanying Salary Schedule Resolution to implement the compensation and classification actions discussed in this staff report and maintain compliance with applicable California laws and regulations. If approved, the updated salary schedule will be effective July 12, 2026.

Consistent with Government Code Section 54953(d)(3)(A) the Council must orally state a summary of Council action on salaries, salary schedules, and fringe benefits for local agency department heads. For ease of records, that statement is as follows, and must be read orally:
“As outlined in the staff report, this item includes a recommendation to approve salary range and medical plan adjustments for department head classifications of:
• Administrative Services Director
• Chief of Police
• Community Development Director
• Economic Development and Community Engagement Director • General Services Director
These adjustments are consistent with the adjustments recommended for both represented and unrepresented employees, as outlined in the staff report. If approved, these changes will become effective on July 12, 2026.”
Attachments

1. Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-___, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California adopting a Memorandum of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association.

2. Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-___, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California adopting a Memorandum of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association.

3. Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-___, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, adopting the amended Salary Table with Cost of Living Adjustments and Market Equity Adjustments.

ITEM 19
Date: July 8, 2026 Page 16 of 16
Subject: Resolutions Adopting the Memorandums of Understanding for the Citrus Heights Police Officers’ Association and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association; Amended Salary Table with Cost-ofLiving Adjustments and Select Market Equity Adjustments; Amendments to the Employer Contribution level for Employee Health Benefits
Printed on Recycled Paper
a. Exhibit A – Amended Salary Schedule.

4. Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-__, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, adopting amendments to the employer contribution level for employee health benefits.

ITEM 19
Printed on Recycled Paper
RESOLUTION NO. 2026- ___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE CITRUS

HEIGHTS POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, pursuant to California Government Code section 3500 et seq., enacted an employer-employee relations policy by adopting Resolutions 2001-110 and 2006-27;
WHEREAS, under the terms of those Resolutions, the City Manager and his/her representatives and representatives of the Citrus Heights Police Officers Association (CHPOA), the recognized employee organization for the Sworn Officer and Sergeants Unit, as designated in said policy, have met and conferred in good faith;
WHEREAS, these parties have reached agreement on matters relating to the employment conditions of the said employees, as reflected by the written Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) which is on file in the City Clerk’s office and hereby referenced; WHEREAS, this MOU would provide the following changes:
• Term: July 1, 2026 – June 30, 2028
• Salaries:

o Section 14.1 – Court Standby
o Article 21 – Personnel Files
o Section 23.1 – Annual Leave
o Article 26 – On Duty Workout Program
WHEREAS, this Council finds that the provisions and agreements contained in said Memorandum are fair and proper and in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the Association has previously ratified the terms and conditions of the Memorandum.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights that the terms and conditions contained in said Memorandum of Understanding are hereby adopted.

The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 8th day of July 2026 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

MariJane Lopez-Taff, Mayor
ATTEST:

Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 19

AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

CITRUS HEIGHTS POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
AND

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2028
ITEM 19
i
Table of Contents
Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i Article 1 Introductory Clauses ..................................................................................................... 1 Section 1.1 Preamble ............................................................................................................ 1 Section 1.2 Personnel Rules ................................................................................................. 1 Article 2 Recognition ................................................................................................................... 1 Section 2.1 Definition of Bargaining Unit............................................................................ 1 Section 2.2 Creation of New Classifications ........................................................................ 1 Article 3 Association Security ..................................................................................................... 1 Section 3.1 Association Dues Deduction ............................................................................. 1 Section 3.2 Nondiscrimination for Association Activity...................................................... 1 Section 3.3 Noncompetition with the CHPOA..................................................................... 2 Article 4 Employer Security ........................................................................................................ 2 Article 5 Management Rights ...................................................................................................... 2 Article 6 Delivery of Police Services .......................................................................................... 3 Section 6.1 Delivery of Police Services ............................................................................... 3 Section 6.2 Vehicle Readiness.............................................................................................. 3 Article 7 Work Rules – Existing Benefits ................................................................................... 3 Section 7.1 Maintenance of Benefits.................................................................................... 3 Section 7.2 Primacy of Agreement ....................................................................................... 3 Article 8 Association Business and Meetings ............................................................................. 3 Section 8.1 Association Meetings ........................................................................................ 3 Section 8.2 Release Time for Internal Affairs Interviews and Grievances .......................... 4 Section 8.3 Time off for Association Training and Conferences ......................................... 4 ITEM 19
ii
Section 8.4 Management Labor Meetings............................................................................ 4 Section 8.5 List of CHPOA Board Members/Stewards ....................................................... 4 Section 8.6 Association Communication.............................................................................. 4 Article 9 Members Rights ............................................................................................................ 4 Section 9.1 Peace Officers Rights ........................................................................................ 4 Section 9.2 Presumption of Innocence ................................................................................. 4 Article 10 Discipline .................................................................................................................. 5 Section 10.1 Procedure ........................................................................................................... 5 Section 10.2 Disciplinary Appeal – Major Discipline............................................................ 5 Section 10.3 Internal Affairs (IA)........................................................................................... 5 Section 10.4 Probationary Release ......................................................................................... 5 Article 11 Salary ........................................................................................................................ 6 Section 11.1 Rate of Pay......................................................................................................... 6 Section 11.2 Overtime ............................................................................................................ 6 Section 11.3 Salary Administration ........................................................................................ 6 Article 12 Seniority .................................................................................................................... 7 Section 12.1 Seniority Defined/Purpose................................................................................. 7 Section 12.2 Seniority for Sabbatical or Annual Leave Selection ......................................... 7 Section 12.3 Seniority Lists .................................................................................................... 7 Section 12.4 Temporary Reassignment.................................................................................. 7 Article 13 Special Compensation ............................................................................................... 7 Section 13.1 Field Training Officer (FTO) Pay ..................................................................... 7 Section 13.2 Acting Supervisor Pay (Temporary Upgrade Pay)............................................ 7 Section 13.3 Specialty Assignment Pay ................................................................................. 8 ITEM 19
iii
Section 13.4 Education Incentive Pay .................................................................................... 9 Section 13.5 Master’s Degree Pay.......................................................................................... 9 Section 13.6 Bilingual Pay ..................................................................................................... 9 Article 14 Court ....................................................................................................................... 10 Section 14.1 Court Standby .................................................................................................. 10 Section 14.2 Court Appearance – Outside of Scheduled Work Hours................................. 10 Article 15 Call Back Pay .......................................................................................................... 11 Article 16 On-Call Pay ............................................................................................................. 11 Article 17 Schedule Changes ................................................................................................... 11 Article 18 Extension of Probation ............................................................................................ 11 Article 19 Employment of Relatives........................................................................................ 12 Article 20 Retirement Benefits ................................................................................................ 12 Article 21 Personnel Files ........................................................................................................ 13 Article 22 Grievance Procedure ............................................................................................... 14 Section 22.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................ 14 Section 22.2 Definitions ....................................................................................................... 14 Section 22.3 Time Limits ..................................................................................................... 14 Section 22.4 Presentation ..................................................................................................... 14 Section 22.5 Employee Rights.............................................................................................. 15 Section 22.6 Application ...................................................................................................... 15 Section 22.7 Informal Discussion......................................................................................... 15 Section 22.8 Formal Grievance Procedure ........................................................................... 15 Section 22.9 Grievance Records........................................................................................... 16 Article 23 Leave Time ............................................................................................................. 16 ITEM 19
iv
Section 23.1 Annual Leave ................................................................................................... 16 Section 23.2 Long Term Medical Leave .............................................................................. 16 Article 24 Uniforms ................................................................................................................. 17 Section 24.1 Uniforms .......................................................................................................... 17 Section 24.2 Uniform Allowance Benefit ............................................................................ 17 Section 24.3 Professional Attire Pay .................................................................................... 17 Article 25 Health/Welfare Benefits.......................................................................................... 17 Section 25.1 Health Benefit .................................................................................................. 17 Article 26 On Duty Physical Fitness Program ......................................................................... 17 Article 27 Term ........................................................................................................................ 18 Appendix Sabbatical Definition and Procedures
ITEM 19
1 Article 1 Introductory Clauses
Section 1.1 Preamble
This Agreement (Agreement) is entered into between the City of Citrus Heights (City) and the Citrus Heights Police Officer’s Association (CHPOA). It is the intent and purpose of this Agreement to assure harmonious labor relations between the parties hereto, to provide an equitable and peaceful process of resolving differences which may arise, and to establish rates of pay, wages, hours of employment and other conditions of employment.

Section 1.2 Personnel Rules
The City personnel rules, regulations and/or policies of the Citrus Heights Police Department (CHPD), which are not in conflict with this Agreement, will remain in effect unless modified after applicable process. No employee shall suffer any loss of wages, hours or conditions of employment by reason of signing this agreement.

Article 2 Recognition
Section 2.1 Definition of Bargaining Unit
Pursuant to the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, the City of Citrus Heights recognizes the Citrus Heights Police Officers Association (CHPOA) as the sole and exclusive representative for all employees in the classifications of Police Officer and Police Sergeant.

Section 2.2 Creation of New Classifications
If the City creates a new sworn job classification in the Police Department that the City intends to add to the bargaining unit, the City shall forward the new job class description and proposed wage to the CHPOA for review. The City agrees to meet and confer with the CHPOA, if requested, regarding compensation and benefits for the new classification.

Article 3 Association Security
Section 3.1 Association Dues Deduction
The City agrees to deduct from the paychecks of employees giving written authorization, CHPOA dues in an amount to be determined annually by the CHPOA every two weeks for a maximum of 24 deductions per year.

The City will directly deposit said dues into a bank account of the CHPOA’s choosing within five (5) business days of each regular paycheck. The CHPOA agrees to have any fees associated with the direct deposit deducted from each direct deposit.

Section 3.2 Nondiscrimination for Association Activity
There shall be no discrimination, interference, restraint, or coercion by the City, or any City representative against any member because of Association membership.

ITEM 19
2 Section 3.3 Noncompetition with the CHPOA
The City agrees there will be no aid, promotion or financing of any labor organizations which purport to represent the employees in this bargaining unit and that any such activities on the part of the City or its agents is prohibited unless permitted under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act or the City’s Employer/Employee Relations Policy.

Article 4 Employer Security
Neither the CHPOA nor any represented employee shall participate in any unlawful concerted labor activity. During the term of this Agreement, no work slowdown, picket, sympathy strike, blue flu or boycott shall be initiated, participated in, supported, or condoned by the Association.

Violation of this section of the agreement shall be grounds for discipline.

Article 5 Management Rights
The City hereby retains and reserves unto itself, without limitation, all powers, rights, authority, duties and responsibilities conferred upon and vested in it by the laws of the Constitution of the State of California, and of the United States, including but not limiting the generality of the foregoing, the right:

To set standards and levels of service;
To determine the procedures and standards of selection for employment; To assign work to and direct its employees;
To determine the methods and means to relieve its employees from duty because of lack of funds or other lawful reasons;
To determine the methods, means and numbers and kinds of personnel by which City operations are to be conducted, including the right to contract or subcontract bargaining unit work provided that the City will meet and confer in advance on the impact of subcontracting on workload and safety and any other matter within the scope of representation;
To determine methods of financing;
To determine size and composition of the work force and allocate and assign work by which the City operations are to be conducted;
To determine and change the number of locations, relocations and types of operations, processes and materials to be used in carrying out all City functions; To make all decisions relating to merit, necessity or organization of City service; To discharge, suspend, demote, reprimand, or otherwise discipline employees for just cause in accordance with applicable laws;
To establish employee performance standards including, but not limited to, quality and standards, and to require compliance therewith;
To take necessary actions to carry out its mission in emergencies; and To exercise complete control and discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its work.

The exercise of the foregoing powers, rights, authority, duties, and responsibilities by the City, the adoption of policies, rules, regulations and practices in furtherance thereof, and the use of judgment and discretion in connection therewith shall be limited only by the specific and express terms of this Memorandum and then only to the extent such specific and express ITEM 19
3 terms hereof are in conformance with the Constitution and laws of the United States and the Constitution and laws of the State of California.

The exercise by the City through its Council and management representatives of its rights hereunder shall not in any way, directly or indirectly, be subject to any grievance procedure nor subject to meeting and conferring.

Nothing herein shall be deemed as a waiver by the Citrus Heights Police Officer’s Association or its Members of rights granted under Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Government Code Sections 3500-3511, as amended) or the Police Officer’s Bill of Rights.

Article 6 Delivery of Police Services
Section 6.1 Delivery of Police Services
The delivery of police services in the most efficient and effective manner is of mutual importance and interest to both the CHPOA and the City. Work procedures, schedules, and assignments for improving services shall be established and revised from time to time in accordance with this agreement.

Section 6.2 Vehicle Readiness
Officers shall be afforded an opportunity to ready vehicles as follows:

Briefings will start on time and officers will be present in briefing in uniform (or fitness if assigned). On the first and subsequent shifts of their workweek, officers will be allowed ten (10) minutes to set up and prepare their assigned patrol vehicle. Officers will then return to roll call for the continuation of the shift briefing. Due to the emergency nature of police work, supervisors may cancel roll call and/or vehicle readiness for officer and/or community safety reasons.

Article 7 Work Rules – Existing Benefits
Section 7.1 Maintenance of Benefits
Unless specifically provided for in this MOU, nothing in this MOU should be deemed to have eliminated or superseded a benefit in an existing policy, rule or binding past practice.

Section 7.2 Primacy of Agreement
The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall control over ordinances and resolutions of the governing body of the City where there is a conflict with a provision of this Agreement.

Article 8 Association Business and Meetings
Section 8.1 Association Meetings
The City will allow elected CHPOA Board Members who are scheduled to work during predetermined Board and Membership meetings release time to attend scheduled Board and Membership meetings, with at least thirty (30) days prior notice to the City, for up to one (1) hour per month, except in cases of emergency, where the staffing impact would not permit the ITEM 19
4 Police Department to operate safely or if the meeting conflicts with Department mandated training. On-duty personnel are required to monitor radio and respond in the event of an emergency.

Section 8.2 Release Time for Internal Affairs Interviews and Grievances The City will allow CHPOA Board Members and shop stewards adequate release time to represent members during internal affairs interviews and grievance meetings while on duty except in cases of emergency where the staffing impact would not permit the Police Department to operate safely. This provision applies to one representative per involved member. Employees will not receive pay for off-duty time spent performing these Association representative duties.

Section 8.3 Time off for Association Training and Conferences The City will allow CHPOA Board members to utilize their accrued time off to attend Association training, and conferences of state/national law enforcement associations, under the same terms and conditions required for all other time-off requests.

Section 8.4 Management Labor Meetings
Employees who would otherwise be working their assigned shift shall be released from their regular duties to attend meet and confer, negotiation and other labor-management meetings, and will be paid for this time during their assigned shift as if they were performing their regular duties. The intent of this section is not to create overtime for any CHPOA member. This article is not subject to grievance.

Section 8.5 List of CHPOA Board Members/Stewards
On January 1st of each year, the CHPOA shall provide the City with a list of the elected Board members of the CHPOA, and any members who are assigned as shop stewards. The CHPOA may update this list as new members are appointed to the Board or to steward positions.

Section 8.6 Association Communication
The City shall provide a location in the Department where a bulletin board may be placed at CHPOA expense to post association business documents. The City shall allow the use of the internal email system for notices of meetings. The City shall allow the use of any City facility that the public may use for the holding of association meetings, with the same reservation and use requirements.

Article 9 Members Rights
Section 9.1 Peace Officers Rights
The City and the CHPOA will both adhere to the rights provided to peace officers under Government Code Section 3300-3312, the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (POBR).

Section 9.2 Presumption of Innocence
All CHPOA represented employees shall be treated fairly and equitably during internal investigations. CHPOA represented employees will be presumed innocent of all allegations until ITEM 19
5 proven otherwise. This article shall not be interpreted to be related to the application of administrative leave by the Department. This article is not subject to grievance.

Article 10 Discipline
Section 10.1 Procedure
Disciplinary matters will be handled in accordance with CHPD Policy Manual.

Section 10.2 Disciplinary Appeal – Major Discipline
When major discipline action, as defined in Citrus Heights Personnel Rules and Regulations §6.4, has been taken, the employee shall continue to have the right to appeal. All matters will be referred to the Office of Administrative Hearings in Sacramento, California. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will be the hearing officer and will prepare an advisory recommendation following the evidentiary hearing. The written advisory recommendation will be sent to each party. The parties will have the opportunity to meet following receipt of the advisory recommendation. The parties may enter into a settlement agreement prior to the advisory recommendation being sent to the City Manager for final ruling. The City Manager shall send his/her final decision of written findings and decision, along with a proof of service of mailing, to each of the parties and each of the parties’ representatives within twenty (20) working days of the receipt of the ALJ’s recommendation.

The City shall bear the cost of the Administrative Law Judge and facility. The transcription costs shall be borne by the party requesting the transcription or may be shared if mutually agreed upon. Each party shall be responsible for their own costs associated with expert testimony or other costs associated with the presentation of their case.

The City Manager’s decision shall be final, subject only to review by a judicial administrative writ of mandamus action.

Section 10.3 Internal Affairs (IA)
The Chief of Police shall designate an investigator to conduct internal affairs investigations. The investigation shall be completed in the most expeditious manner possible. Should the investigation not be completed within thirty (30) calendar days following the date the respondent is interviewed as part of the investigation, the Department should provide a status update to the respondent. In the event a notification is not made, the respondent may contact the Professional Standards & Training Lieutenant or Sergeant and shall receive a status update.

Section 10.4 Probationary Release
Any CHPOA represented employee released from probation may request a Lubey/Liberty Interest hearing with the Chief of Police or his/her designee, as required by law, if the discharge seriously affects the employee’s ability to find comparable employment elsewhere. A liberty interest is implied where: (1) there is a stigmatization charge; (2) the employee denies the charge or contests its accuracy; and (3) there is a public disclosure of the charge. The purpose of the hearing is to provide the discharged employee with an opportunity to clear his or her name.

ITEM 19
6 Article 11 Salary
Section 11.1 Rate of Pay
Base Rate of Pay - Base rate of pay shall be defined as the base hourly rate of pay that an employee receives in the salary range.

Regular Rate of Pay - Regular rate of pay shall be as defined by the Fair Labor Standards Act, i.e. as the employee’s base hourly rate of pay, plus all incentive and specialty pays earned on a recurring basis and converted to an hourly rate.

Section 11.2 Overtime
Overtime shall be paid under this MOU for any hours worked outside an employee’s prescheduled hours. Part-time employees shall be eligible for overtime for any hours worked over forty (40) in a workweek. Overtime shall be paid at 1.5 times the employee’s base rate of pay.

FLSA overtime is hours actually worked over the applicable FLSA threshold under Section 207(k) of the FLSA. Despite the City’s agreement to pay overtime under the MOU for hours worked outside an employee’s prescheduled hours, the threshold for FLSA overtime for all sworn employees remains hours actually worked beyond 171 hours during the applicable 28-day work period.

Section 11.3 Salary Administration
Effective July 12, 2026 or the first full pay period after adoption of this Memorandum of Understanding, whichever is later, the City agrees to the following modifications to employee salaries:

1. A one and seventy-seventh hundredths’ percent (1.77%) market equity adjustment for Police Officers;

2. A one and eight hundredths’ percent (1.08%) market equity adjustment for Police Sergeants; and

3. A three and eight tenths’ percent (3.8%) cost of living adjustment (COLA) for all represented classifications.

Note: Equity will be applied 1st, then COLA. Effective the first full pay period after July 1, 2027:

1. Cost of living adjustment between two and three percent (2-3%) based on April 12-month CPI-U San Francisco/San Jose/Hayward for all members.

ITEM 19
7 Article 12 Seniority
Section 12.1 Seniority Defined/Purpose
Seniority is defined as an employee’s date of hire into the classification of police officer or sergeant with the City. Seniority will be used to bid for shifts (e.g., days/swings/graves) in patrol. Patrol officers and sergeants will select their shift for each fiscal year. Shift bids generally occur by the end of April, with the new shifts beginning in late June/early July.

Section 12.2 Seniority for Sabbatical or Annual Leave Selection Seniority will be used for patrol officers and sergeants to select their annual leave or sabbatical once assigned to their patrol teams for the year. Patrol officers and sergeants may elect to use their seniority for one selection, and then will go to the bottom of the list for the other.

Sabbaticals may be rescheduled by the Department in the event of exigent circumstances or staffing related emergencies.

Section 12.3 Seniority Lists
The City will maintain and update a seniority list of all CHPOA members by classification, and provide it semi-annually to the CHPOA. The list will be by hire date by classification. In the event of a tie, the higher seniority is given based on the below in the order as listed:

1. Years of sworn peace officer (as defined in 830.1 PC) experience

2. Years of paid City of Citrus Heights service

3. POST academy graduation date

4. Academy ranking for CHPD recruits
If none of the above are met, seniority will be decided by random drawing.

Section 12.4 Temporary Reassignment
The Chief of Police has the right to make temporary reassignment of employees, not to exceed 90 days, based on Departmental needs. This reassignment is not considered punitive. This article is not subject to grievance.

Article 13 Special Compensation
Section 13.1 Field Training Officer (FTO) Pay
The City reserves the right to determine the need for Field Training Officers (FTOs) and to assign officers to serve as FTOs. FTOs will receive five percent (5%) of the base rate of pay for each hour assigned and worked as an FTO and for the full shift if the officer spent fifty percent (50%) or more of the shift performing FTO duties. This pay does not apply to Senior Lead Officer/Corporals. During a shift holdover, if the overtime is not due to the trainee and/or the trainee is not present during the overtime, the FTO incentive pay shall not be applied to the overtime hours worked.

Section 13.2 Acting Supervisor Pay (Temporary Upgrade Pay) The City will pay any employee designated by the Department to serve in the capacity of acting supervisor five percent (5%) of the base rate of pay for all hours worked in that capacity.

ITEM 19
8 Employees serving as an Acting Supervisor will be required to perform all of the duties of the higher classification and will be relieved of all duties of the lower position. This is separate and distinct from out-of-class pay.

Section 13.3 Specialty Assignment Pay
CHPOA bargaining unit employees who are eligible to receive special assignment/incentive pay as identified below shall initially receive additional compensation equal to three percent (3%) of their base pay at the beginning of the pay period of the specialty assignment. Following six months in the special assignment, the employee shall receive additional compensation equal to five percent (5%) of their base pay, effective the beginning of first pay period following six months in the special assignment. Special assignment/incentive pay pursuant to this section is not stackable and may not be compounded based on the number of assignments. Employees cannot receive more than five percent (5%) in special assignment/incentive pay pursuant to this section.

Detective (Detective Division Premium)
Police officers and sergeants who are routinely and consistently assigned to the detective/investigations division shall receive detective premium pay. Detective premium pay is designated as special compensation within the meaning of Section 20636 of the California Government Code and Section 571(a)(4) of the CalPERS regulations and/or as defined pensionable compensation in the California Government Code and the CalPERS regulations as amended.

Professional Standards & Training Unit (Police Administrative Officer) Rank and File police officers and sergeants who are routinely and consistently assigned to the Professional Standards & Training Unit to provide support for the police chief and command staff in the operation of the police department shall receive police administrative officer premium pay. Police administrative officer premium pay is designated as special compensation within the meaning of Section 20636 of the California Government Code and Section 571(a)(4) of the CalPERS regulations and/or as defined pensionable compensation in the California Government Code and the CalPERS regulations as amended.

Lead Officer/Corporal (Lead Worker/Supervisor Premium)
Police Corporals who are routinely and consistently assigned to lead other police officers in the performance of their duties and shall receive lead officer/corporal pay. This assignment is not eligible for FTO pay (see section 13.1). Lead worker/supervisory premium pay is designated as special compensation within the meaning of Section 20636 of the California Government Code and Section 571(a)(4) of the CalPERS regulations and/or as defined pensionable compensation in the California Government Code and the CalPERS regulations as amended.

Motorcycle Patrol Officer (Motorcycle Patrol Premium)
Police officers and sergeants who are routinely and consistently assigned to operate and/or patrol on a motorcycle shall receive motorcycle patrol officer pay. Employees are ITEM 19
9 not eligible for this premium until they successfully pass the required training (e.g., POST Basic Motor). Motorcycle patrol premium is designated as special compensation within the meaning of Section 20636 of the California Government Code and Section 571(a)(4) of the CalPERS regulations and/or as defined pensionable compensation in the California Government Code and the CalPERS regulations as amended.

Special Weapons & Tactics Team (Marksmanship Pay)
Police officers and sergeants who meet department standards as a marksperson shall receive marksperson incentive pay while assigned to SWAT. Employees are not eligible for this premium until they successfully complete required department training and satisfy applicable shooting standards. Marksmanship pay is designated as special compensation within the meaning of Section 20636 of the California Government Code and Section 571(a)(1) of the CalPERS regulations and/or as defined pensionable compensation in the California Government Code and the CalPERS regulations as amended.

The decision to assign and the length of a specialty assignment is at the discretion of the Chief of Police.

Special Assignment Service Differential
If an employee has successfully completed at least one (1) year in one of the above special assignments, the employee is eligible for Special Assignment Service Differential pay equal to five percent (5%) of their base pay when they are not actively assigned to a special assignment.

Special Assignment Service Differential pay is not reportable to CalPERS. Upon promotion, eligibility for Special Assignment Service Differential pay will end until the employee successfully completes at least one (1) year in one of the above assignments at the new rank.

Section 13.4 Education Incentive Pay
The City shall pay an education incentive of a maximum of ten percent (10%) of base pay per month calculated as follows:

2.5% for AA Degree or equivalent

2.5% for Intermediate POST

2.5% for BA/BS Degree

2.5% for Advanced Post
Section 13.5 Master’s Degree Pay
The City shall pay a master’s degree incentive in the amount of five percent (5%) of base pay per month.

Section 13.6 Bilingual Pay
The City shall pay a bilingual pay incentive in the amount of $100 per month for employees certified by Human Resources as Spanish or Slavic speaking. The employee is required to pass a proficiency test. The bilingual pay incentive also applies to employees passing a proficiency assessment in American Sign Language. Bilingual pay does not compound.

ITEM 19
10 Article 14 Court
Section 14.1 Court Standby
Employees shall receive two (2) hours of straight time at the base rate of pay for each day assigned to Court Standby time while off duty. However, the employee shall not be eligible for this standby pay if the employee also reports for a court appearance that day. Standby and Court appearance pay will not be paid for the same court proceeding on the same day. “To Be Notified” status does not qualify for Court Standby pay.

Section 14.2 Court Appearance – Outside of Scheduled Work Hours Employees required to attend court outside of their scheduled work hours related to actions taken as an employee of the City of Citrus Heights, shall receive the following compensation:

When an employee is subpoenaed or required by the City to appear in criminal court, traffic court, civil court, or a hearing board in the employee’s capacity as a City employee and is not scheduled to be on duty during the time of the appearance, upon report to the court or location of the hearing the employee shall receive a minimum of four (4) hours pay at time and one-half (1.5) the employee’s base rate of pay, or the actual amount of time spent in the court, whichever is greater.

When such court appearance on off-duty time requires the employee to be in attendance before and after the lunch recess, such lunchtime shall be included in determining the employee’s court overtime pay.

When the employee’s court appearance is scheduled within two (2) hours at the end of the employee’s work hours, the employee will be compensated at the rate of time and one-half the employee’s base rate of pay starting at the end of the employee’s regular scheduled shift. This time is to be used for court preparation and traveling to court. The four-hour overtime minimum will begin at the end of their regular work hours.

When the employee’s court appearance is scheduled within two (2) hours before the beginning of the employee’s regular work hours, the employee will be compensated at the rate of time and one-half the employee’s base rate of pay for a minimum of two (2) hours for such court appearance.

When the employee’s court appearance is scheduled more than two (2) hours before the beginning of the employee’s regular work hours, the employee will be compensated at the rate of time and one-half the employee’s base rate of pay for a minimum of four (4) hours for such court appearance.

Cancelation of court appearance - when the employee’s court appearance gets cancelled the day of court the employee will be compensated at time and one-half for a minimum of three (3) hours.

ITEM 19
11 Any employee who receives an a.m. subpoena more than four (4) hours prior to a p.m. subpoena, shall receive the applicable minimum overtime for each subpoena, regardless of length of appearance.

Article 15 Call Back Pay
CHPOA members who are required to report for duty other than a scheduled shift, or during their Patrol Mini-Sabbatical, will be compensated four (4) hours at time and one half the base rate of pay. A continuation or extension of a shift, as defined below, is not considered “Call Back” for the purpose of this section.

Shift Continuation: If called to report to their assigned shift 30 minutes or less prior to the beginning of a shift, the employee will be compensated at time and one-half the base rate of pay.

Shift Extensions: Employees will be compensated at time and one-half the base rate of pay for hours worked after the end of their shifts.

Article 16 On-Call Pay
Employees required to remain in an on-call status shall receive one hour of straight time pay for on-duty days and two hours of straight time pay for off-duty days. On-call pay will be paid in addition to applicable call back pay. The decision to assign on-call pay is at the discretion of the Chief of Police.

On-Call duty requires that the employee:

Be ready to respond to calls for service;
Be available by phone, email, or radio; and
Refrain from activities, which might impair the employee’s ability to perform their assigned duties.

Article 17 Schedule Changes
The City may change an employee’s schedule with seven (7) days’ notice, unless an emergency exists that requires schedule change. Non-emergency schedule changes with less than seven (7) days’ notice shall result in overtime compensation for the first full shift of the changed schedule.

Nothing in this section is meant to prohibit a schedule change as a result of a mutual agreement between the employee and the City.

Due to the unique requirements of officer training, this section will not apply to members until after they have completed the initial Field Training Program for a full-time police officer.

Article 18 Extension of Probation
CHPOA represented employees shall only have their eighteen (18) month probationary period extended due to a time period of longer than thirty (30) days during the member’s probation based on a leave of absence or other restricted light duty during which the member was not performing the full regular duties of his/her position - including patrol duties - on a continuous ITEM 19
12 basis. In such circumstance, the employee’s probationary period will be extended for the same length of time as he/she did not perform the regular duties of the position.

Article 19 Employment of Relatives
Employees are prohibited from directly supervising, occupying a position in the line of supervision, or being directly supervised by any other employee who is a relative or with whom they are involved in a personal or business relationship.

1. If circumstances require that such a supervisor/subordinate relationship exists temporarily, the supervisor shall make every reasonable effort to defer matters involving the involved employee to an uninvolved supervisor.

2. When personnel and circumstances permit, the Department will attempt to make every reasonable effort to avoid placing employees in such supervisor/subordinate situations.

The Department however, reserves the right to transfer or reassign any employee to another position within the same classification, or, if necessary, separate an employee, if it deems it necessary to avoid conflicts with any provision of this section.

Article 20 Retirement Benefits
The City contracts with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) for retirement benefits for eligible employees. All employees regardless of hire date, pay the member contribution rate as determined by CalPERS. The retirement formula is determined by an employee’s date of hire, classification and status with CalPERS.

CHPOA bargaining unit employees subject to the provisions of the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) shall be eligible for the 2.7% @ 57 retirement formula, three-year average compensation method, as defined by the PEPRA legislation.

CHPOA bargaining unit employees determined by CalPERS to be classic members, hired by Citrus Heights Police Department on or after August 15, 2011, shall be eligible for the 3% @ 55 retirement formula, three-year average compensation method.

CHPOA bargaining unit employees hired prior to August 15, 2011, shall be eligible for the 3% @ 50 retirement formula, single highest year compensation method.

CalPERS has the final determination regarding an employee’s status with CalPERS.

Effective September 28, 2023, CHPOA bargaining unit employees participating in the 3% @ 50 retirement formula or the 3% @ 55 retirement formula (Classic Members) agree to cost share a portion of the employer contribution pursuant to Government Code section 20516 as follows:
a. Employees will contribute an additional one percent (1%) for a total of four percent (4%) towards the employer contribution. The foregoing contribution shall be over and above the normal contribution rate required by the Public Employee Retirement Law (PERL), making the combined total employee contribution equal to thirteen percent (13%).
b. The additional one percent (1%) employee cost share shall be effective as soon as administratively possible following the date that CalPERS approves a contract amendment implementing the amended cost sharing agreement. The City will ITEM 19
13 initiate the contract amendment process with CalPERS following adoption of the MOU.

Article 21 Personnel Files
Any employee may request access to his/her own personnel file(s) during the normal business hours of the individual(s) responsible for maintaining such file(s). Any employee seeking the removal of any item from his/her personnel file shall file a written request to the Chief of Police through the chain of command. The Department shall thereafter remove any such item if appropriate or within 30 days provide the employee with a written explanation why the contested item will not be removed (Government Code 3306.5). If the contested item is not removed from the file, the employee’s request and the department’s written response shall be retained with the contested item in the employee’s personnel file.

Employees may be restricted from accessing files containing ongoing Internal Affairs investigations to the extent that it could jeopardize or compromise the investigation pending final disposition or notice to the employee of the intent to discipline or confidential portions of Internal Affairs files which have not been sustained against the employee.

Section 21.1 Documented Counseling and Letters of Reprimand Documented Counseling is non-disciplinary corrective action achieved through written confirmation of verbal counseling sessions. Documented Counseling is designed to inform employees about specific performance concerns and/or non-compliance with city and departmental policies, procedures or practices. The goal of Documented Counseling is to improve job performance by educating and training employees about acceptable job standards.

Each Documented Counseling memorandum shall contain the following:

1. Date of the counseling session.

2. Names of the counseled employee and counseling supervisor.

3. Summary of the issues/concerns and the results of the discussion.

4. Signatures of the counseled employee and counseling supervisor.

The Documented Counseling memorandum shall be retained in the employee’s department working evaluation file. Generally, Documented Counseling should be purged after one year from the department working evaluation folder.

Documented Counseling may be retained beyond the standard one-year (1) purge period if it is associated with active litigation, an active Internal Affairs investigation or has been included as an exhibit or supporting document in an Internal Affairs file. The City shall not reference or rely upon a Documented Counseling that is purged or passed its purge date pursuant to the aforementioned sections for any future personnel purpose.

ITEM 19
14 Letters of Reprimand are first level disciplinary actions imposed upon an employee which formally document an employee’s unsatisfactory job performance and/or noncompliance with departmental policies, procedures or practices.

A Letter of Reprimand shall be retained in the employee’s department working evaluation file.

A Letter of Reprimand should be purged after twenty-four (24) months from the date of issuance, provided that no additional discipline similar in nature is imposed on the employee during the twenty-four (24) month period. If the employee receives additional disciplinary action for conduct of a similar nature during the twenty-four (24) month period, the twenty-four (24) month period restarts on the date of the new disciplinary action. Additionally, Letters of Reprimand may be retained beyond the standard twenty-four (24) month purge period if it is associated with an active litigation, an active Internal Affairs investigation or has been included as an exhibit or supporting document in an Internal Affairs file.

Article 22 Grievance Procedure
Section 22.1 Purpose
This grievance procedure shall be used to process and resolve grievances per the definitions listed below:

To resolve grievances informally at the lowest possible level.

To provide an orderly procedure for reviewing and resolving grievances promptly.

Section 22.2 Definitions
A grievance is a complaint of one (1) or a group of employees, or a dispute between the City and the CHPOA, involving the interpretation, application, or enforcement of the express terms of this Agreement, the Department Policy Manual, the City rules, regulations and policies. It does not include discipline matters or personnel evaluations.

As used in this procedure, the term "immediate supervisor" means the individual who assigns, reviews and/or directs the work of an employee.

As used in this procedure the term "party" means an employee, the CHPOA or the City.

Section 22.3 Time Limits
Each party involved in a grievance shall act quickly so that the grievance may be resolved promptly. Every effort should be made to complete action within the time limits contained in the grievance procedure, but with the written consent of all parties the time limitation for any step may be extended.

Section 22.4 Presentation
An employee or the CHPOA representative, who is a full-time employee, or both, may present a grievance while on duty. On group grievances no more than four City employees may participate while on duty, whether grievants, representatives, or witnesses, unless otherwise approved by the City.

ITEM 19
15 Section 22.5 Employee Rights
The employee retains all rights conferred by Section 3500, et seq., of the Government Code.

Grievances pertaining to an individual employee must be signed by the employee or the CHPOA representative personally on all appeals.

Section 22.6 Application
Grievances as defined in Article 22 shall be brought through this procedure.

Section 22.7 Informal Discussion
The grievance initially shall be discussed with the immediate supervisor within thirty (30) calendar days of the act(s) and or omission(s) giving rise to the grievance. The employee may be represented by the CHPOA representative. Within seven (7) calendar days, the immediate supervisor shall give a decision or response.

Section 22.8 Formal Grievance Procedure
Formal Grievance – Step 1:

If an informal grievance is not resolved to the satisfaction of the grievant, or if there is reason to bypass the informal step, a formal grievance may be initiated. A formal grievance may be initiated no later than:

Thirty (30) calendar days after the event or circumstances occasioning the grievance; or Fifteen (15) calendar days of the decision rendered in the informal grievance procedure.

A formal grievance shall be initiated in writing and shall be filed with the Lieutenant as the first level of appeal. The grievant may be represented by the CHPOA representative.

Within fifteen (15) calendar days after the initiation of the formal grievance, the Lieutenant at the first level of appeal shall investigate the grievance, and give a decision in writing to the grievant.

Formal Grievance – Step 2:

If the grievant is not satisfied with the decision rendered pursuant to Step 1, the grievant may appeal the decision within fifteen (15) days to the Division Commander. The grievant may be represented by the CHPOA representative or Association Counsel.

Within fifteen (15) calendar days after the initiation of the Step 2, the Division Commander at the second level of appeal shall investigate the grievance, and give a decision in writing to the grievant.

Formal Grievance – Step 3:

If the grievant is not satisfied with the decision rendered pursuant to Step 2, the grievant may appeal the decision within fifteen (15) calendar days to the Chief of Police. The CHPOA representative or Association Counsel may represent the grievant.

The Chief of Police shall schedule a mutually agreeable time to hear the grievance, which shall be within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the grievance. The Chief of Police shall respond in writing to the grievant within fifteen (15) calendar days following the grievance hearing.

ITEM 19
16 Formal Grievance – Step 4:

If the grievant is not satisfied with the decision rendered pursuant to Step 3, the grievant may appeal the decision within fifteen (15) calendar days to the City Manager. The CHPOA representative or Association Counsel may represent the grievant.

The City Manager will review all documents and render a final decision. The City Manager shall respond in writing to the grievant within fifteen (15) calendar days following the receipt of all documents.

Section 22.9 Grievance Records
At the conclusion of the grievance process, all documents pertaining to the process shall be forwarded to the Chief of Police for inclusion into a secure file for all written grievances.

Article 23 Leave Time
Section 23.1 Annual Leave
Employees shall accrue annual leave as follows:

Years of Service Annual Accrual Maximum Accrual
Year 0-Year 4 136 272
Year 5-Year 9 160 320
Year 10-Year 14 184 368
Year 15-Year 19 200 400
Year 20-Beyond 240 480
Years of service, for new employees, will be calculated based on all years of service employed as a peace officer as defined in PC 830.1(a). Time as a peace officer as defined in PC 830.1(b) will only count if the employee has time as defined in PC 830.1(a). Once the maximum accrual limit has been reached, the Annual Leave accrual hours will be added to the Long-Term Medical Leave hours until the employee utilizes the Annual Leave hours thereby reducing the balance below the maximum accrual limit. At no time may an employee’s Annual Leave hours exceed the maximum accrual limit.

Section 23.2 Long Term Medical Leave
Employees accrue a total of 40 hours of Long-Term Medical Leave per year beginning on the date of hire. Long Term Medical Leave may be used for an illness or injury requiring the employee to be absent from work. An employee becomes eligible to use this leave only after he/she has utilized 24 hours of accrued leave.

A medical certification may be required. An employee may continue to use Long Term Medical Leave for the same protracted illness even if the need for leave is sporadic (e.g., for treatments, etc.). Unused Long Term Medical Leave is not paid out upon termination of employment.

ITEM 19
17 Article 24 Uniforms
Section 24.1 Uniforms
The City will provide uniforms for CHPOA represented employees at no cost to the employee.

Damaged or worn uniforms will be repaired or replaced with supervisor approval.

Section 24.2 Uniform Allowance Benefit
The City shall report a uniform allowance benefit at the rate of $31.00 biweekly to CalPERS for eligible employees as determined by CalPERS. Eligible employees shall be required to pay the employee contribution rate on the value of the uniform allowance benefit.

Section 24.3 Professional Attire Pay
Eligible Police Detectives and Sergeants assigned to General Investigations and the Professional Standards and Training Unit shall receive $850 per fiscal year for purchasing professional attire.

The professional attire pay is paid at the beginning of the fiscal year for eligible association members. This amount will be pro-rated based upon the date the Officer and/or Sergeant is assigned to this unit and will be calculated on the remaining pay periods in the fiscal year. This pay does not qualify as special compensation for CalPERS pension purposes.

Article 25 Health/Welfare Benefits
Section 25.1 Health Benefit
Effective August 1, 2026, the City will pay up to the following monthly amounts toward health insurance premiums:

Employee only - $1,150.00
Employee Plus One - $2,350.00
Employee Plus Family - $3,050.00
If an employee has qualifying outside health insurance coverage through a spouse, domestic partner or alternative retirement, the employee can cash-out $600 per month or add this amount to deferred compensation. An additional $100 will go to a Health Reimbursement Account or Deferred Compensation (457) plan.
*City will cover the administrative fees of the Health Reimbursement Account.

Article 26 On Duty Physical Fitness Program
Employees will participate in an On Duty physical fitness program, unless operational needs warrant foregoing, as determined by the unit or on duty supervisor. Employees will be provided with one (1) hour of release time to participate in a physical fitness program. The one (1) hour includes a minimum of forty (40) minutes for exercise and a maximum of twenty (20) minutes for donning and doffing.

ITEM 19
18 No overtime is permitted for participating in the on duty physical fitness program. Overtime is not authorized for physical fitness activities and employees will not be paid overtime for such activities.

Daily participation and physical fitness schedules will be determined by the unit or on duty supervisor. The unit or on-duty supervisor shall ensure the employee’s physical fitness program is appropriate to the employee’s assigned duties and job specifications.

The on duty physical fitness program is separate from department mandated training and the department wellness program.

Article 27 Term
The term of this Agreement shall be from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2028 (all applicable side letters entered).

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS _________________________________ Ashley J. Feeney, City Manager ______________________________ Patrick Clark, Lead Negotiator Susan Talwar, Administrative Services
Director
Melissa Rojas, Human Resources Manager
Approved as to Form:

Ryan Jones, City Attorney

CITRUS HEIGHTS POLICE OFFICERS
ASSOCIATION (CHPOA) ___________________________________ Jennifer Silva, CHPOA President __________________________________ Timothy Talbot, CHPOA Representative Attest:

Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 19
Printed on Recycled Paper
RESOLUTION NO. 2026- ___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE CITRUS HEIGHTS POLICE EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, pursuant to California Government Code section 3500 et seq., enacted an employer-employee relations policy by adopting Resolutions 2001-110 and 2006-27;
WHEREAS, under the terms of those Resolutions, the City Manager and his/her representatives and representatives of the Citrus Heights Police Employees Association (CHPEA), the recognized employee organization for the non-sworn police classifications, as designated in said policy, have met and conferred in good faith;
WHEREAS, these parties have reached agreement on matters relating to the employment conditions of the said employees, as reflected by the written Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) which is on file in the City Clerk’s office and hereby referenced; WHEREAS, this MOU would provide the following changes:
• Term: July 1, 2026 – June 30, 2030
• Salaries:
o Effective July 12, 2026, or the first full pay period after adoption of the Memorandum of Understanding, whichever is later:
 3.8% COLA for all represented classifications; and
 Market equity adjustments to bring classifications within 5% of market median:
a. Community Services Officer I/II/Senior – 0.77%
b. Crime Scene/Property Evidence Specialist I/II/Senior – 0.77% c. Police Crime Analyst – 1.11%
o Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2027, COLA between two and four percent (2% - 4%) based on April 12-month CPI-U San Francisco/San Jose/Hayward for all members.
o LIMITED REOPENER: Prior to July 1, 2028, the City and the Association agree to meet and confer regarding: (1) Section 11.4 (Salary Adjustments), as it specifically relates to potential Market Equity adjustments; and (2) Section 25.1 (Health Benefit), as it specifically relates to the City’s maximum contribution to an employee’s health plan.
o Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2028, COLA between two and four percent (2% - 4%) based on April 12-month CPI-U San Francisco/San Jose/Hayward for all members.

ITEM 19

o Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2029, COLA between two and four percent (2% - 4%) based on April 12-month CPI-U San Francisco/San Jose/Hayward for all members.
• City Medical Plan Contribution – Effective August 1, 2026:
o Employee Only – up to $1,150 per month
o Employee Plus One – up to $2,350 per month
o Employee Plus Two or More – up to $ 3,050 per month
• In-Lieu of Medical Plan – Effective August 1, 2026:
o If an employee has proof of qualifying outside health insurance coverage, provide $800 per month ($600 plus $200 to an employee’s Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) or deferred compensation account). • Various Non-Economic Contract Provision Updates:
o Article 11 – Overtime (cleanup language)
o Article 13 – Special Compensation (cleanup language)
o Article 14 – Education (cleanup language)
WHEREAS, this Council finds that the provisions and agreements contained in said Memorandum are fair and proper and in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the Association has previously ratified the terms and conditions of the Memorandum.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights that the terms and conditions contained in said Memorandum of Understanding are hereby adopted.

The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 8th day of July 2026 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

MariJane Lopez-Taff, Mayor
ATTEST:

ITEM 19

Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 19
i

AGREEMENT

BETWEEN
CITRUS HEIGHTS POLICE EMPLOYEES’

ASSOCIATION
AND

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS
July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2030
ITEM 19

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1.1 Preamble .................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1.2 Personnel Rules .......................................................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE 2 RECOGNITION ............................................................................................................... 1 Section 2.1 Definition of Bargaining Unit ..................................................................................................... 1 Section 2.2 Creation of New Classifications .................................................................................................. 1 ARTICLE 3 ASSOCIATION SECURITY ........................................................................................... 1 Section 3.1 Association Dues Deduction........................................................................................................ 1 Section 3.2 Noncompetition with the CHPEA ............................................................................................... 2 ARTICLE 4 EMPLOYER SECURITY ................................................................................................ 2 ARTICLE 5 MANAGEMENT RIGHTS.............................................................................................. 2 ARTICLE 6 DELIVERY OF POLICE SERVICES ............................................................................ 3 Section 6.1 Delivery of Police Services .......................................................................................................... 3 Section 6.2 Vehicle Readiness ....................................................................................................................... 3 ARTICLE 7 WORK RULES – EXISTING BENEFITS ..................................................................... 3 Section 7.1 Maintenance of Benefits ............................................................................................................. 3 Section 7.2 Primacy of Agreement ................................................................................................................ 3 ARTICLE 8 ASSOCIATION BUSINESS AND MEETINGS ............................................................ 3 Section 8.1 Association Meetings .................................................................................................................. 3 Section 8.2 Release Time for IA Interviews and Grievances ......................................................................... 4 Section 8.3 Time Off for Association Training and Conferences .............................................................. 4 Section 8.4 Management Labor Meetings ................................................................................................ 4 Section 8.5 List of CHPEA Board Members and Shop Stewards ............................................................. 4 Section 8.6 Association Communication ................................................................................................... 4 ITEM 19
ARTICLE 9 MEMBERS RIGHTS ................................................................................................... 4 Section 9.1 Presumption of Innocence ...................................................................................................... 4 ARTICLE 10 DISCIPLINE ................................................................................................................. 4 Section 10.1 Procedure ............................................................................................................................... 4 Section 10.2 Disciplinary Appeal – Major Discipline ................................................................................. 4 Section 10.3 Internal Affairs...................................................................................................................... 5 ARTICLE 11 SALARY........................................................................................................................ 5 Section 11.1 Rates of Pay Defined .............................................................................................................. 5 Section 11.2 Overtime ................................................................................................................................ 5 Section 11.3 Salary Administration ............................................................................................................ 6 Section 11.4 Salary Adjustments ................................................................................................................ 6 Section 11.5 Advancement from Entry Level to Journey Level within Classification ................................ 7 ARTICLE 12 SENIORITY FOR ANNUAL LEAVE SELECTION AND SHIFT BID................. 7 Section 12.1 Seniority Defined/Purpose...................................................................................................... 7 Section 12.2 Procedure For Annual Leave Selection .................................................................................. 8 Section 12.3 Ties in Hire Date .................................................................................................................... 8 Section 12.4 Temporary Reassignment ...................................................................................................... 8 ARTICLE 13 SPECIAL COMPENSATION ..................................................................................... 8 Section 13.1 Communications Training Officer (CTO) Pay – Training Premium ..................................... 8 Section 13.2 Training Assignment Pay – Training Premium ..................................................................... 8 Section 13.3 Acting Supervisor Pay ............................................................................................................ 8 Section 13.4 Bilingual Pay – Bilingual Premium ........................................................................................ 9 ARTICLE 14 EDUCATION ................................................................................................................ 9 Section 14.1 Education Incentive Pay ........................................................................................................ 9 Section 14.2 Training ................................................................................................................................. 9 ITEM 19
ARTICLE 15 COURT.......................................................................................................................... 9 Section 15.1 Court Standby ........................................................................................................................ 9 Section 15.2 Court Appearance – Outside of Scheduled Work Hours ...................................................... 10 ARTICLE 16 CALL BACK PAY ..................................................................................................... 10 ARTICLE 17 ON-CALL PAY .......................................................................................................... 10 ARTICLE 18 SCHEDULES .............................................................................................................. 10 Section 18.1 Work Shifts and Work Schedules ........................................................................................ 10 Section 18.2 Police Dispatcher Work Schedules...............................................................................................11 SECTION 18.3 POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN SCHEDULES .............................................................. 11 ARTICLE 19 EXTENSION OF PROBATION ............................................................................... 11 ARTICLE 20 RETIREMENT BENEFITS ...................................................................................... 11 ARTICLE 21 PERSONNEL FILES ................................................................................................. 11 ARTICLE 22 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ................................................................................... 12 ARTICLE 23 HOLIDAY/LEAVE TIME ........................................................................................ 12 Section 23.1 Holidays ................................................................................................................................ 12 Section 23.3 Annual Leave ........................................................................................................................ 13 Section 23.4 Long Term Medical Leave ....................................................................................................13 Section 23.5 Bereavement Leave ............................................................................................................... 13 ARTICLE 24 UNIFORMS ................................................................................................................ 13 Section 24.1 Uniforms ............................................................................................................................... 14 Section 24.2 Uniform Allowance Benefit ................................................................................................... 14 ARTICLE 25 HEALTH/WELFARE BENEFITS ........................................................................... 14 Section 25.1 Health Benefit ....................................................................................................................... 14 Section 25.2 Dental Insurance ................................................................................................................... 14 ITEM 19
Section 25.3 Vision Insurance ................................................................................................................... 14 Section 25.4 Flexible Spending Account .................................................................................................... 14 Section 25.5 Long Term Disability Insurance ........................................................................................... 15 Section 25.6 Life Insurance .......................................................................................................................15 Section 25.7 On-Duty Physical Fitness Program.......................................................................................15 ARTICLE 26 SEVERABILITY........................................................................................................15 ARTICLE 27 TERM..........................................................................................................................15 ITEM 19
1 ARTICLE 1 INTRODUCTORY CLAUSES
SECTION 1.1 PREAMBLE
This Agreement (Agreement) is entered into between the City of Citrus Heights (City) and the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association (CHPEA). It is the intent and purpose of this Agreement to assure harmonious labor relations between the parties hereto, to provide an equitable and peaceful process of resolving differences which may arise, and to establish rates of pay, wages, hours of employment and other terms and conditions of employment.

SECTION 1.2 PERSONNEL RULES
The City personnel rules, regulations and/or policies of the Citrus Heights Police Department (“CHPD”), which are not in conflict with this agreement, shall remain in full force and effect unless modified after applicable process. No employee shall suffer any loss of wages, hours or other conditions of employment by reason of signing this agreement.

ARTICLE 2 RECOGNITION
SECTION 2.1 DEFINITION OF BARGAINING UNIT
Pursuant to the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, the City of Citrus Heights recognizes the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association (CHPEA) as the sole and exclusive representative for all employees in the classifications of Community Services Officers, Crime Scene/Property and Evidence Specialists, Police Records Technician, Police Dispatchers, Police Crime Analysts, Code Enforcement Officers, and Animal Services Officers.

SECTION 2.2 CREATION OF NEW CLASSIFICATIONS
If the City creates a new job classification in the Police Department that the City intends to add to the Bargaining unit, the City shall forward the new job class description and proposed wage to the CHPEA for review. The City agrees to meet and confer with the CHPEA, if requested, regarding compensation and benefits for the new job classification.

ARTICLE 3 ASSOCIATION SECURITY
SECTION 3.1 ASSOCIATION DUES DEDUCTION
Following receipt of notice from the CHPEA that written authorization has been provided to the Association by members in the unit, the City shall deduct from the paychecks of employees, CHPEA dues in the amount to be determined annually by the CHPEA every two weeks for a maximum of twenty-four (24) deductions per year. The City shall provide a check or directly deposit said dues into a bank account designated by the CHPEA within five (5) business days of each regular paycheck. The CHPEA agrees to have any fees associated with the direct deposit deducted from each direct deposit. CHPEA also agrees to notify the City when it has received notification from a unit member revoking such dues deduction authorization.

The CHPEA, in consideration for and as a condition of the city withholding and transmitting payroll deductions shall hold harmless the City of Citrus Heights, its officers, and employees from any liability that may result from making, changing or canceling requested deductions.

ITEM 19
SECTION 3.2 NONCOMPETITION WITH THE CHPEA
The City agrees there will be no aid, promotion or financing of any labor organizations which represent the employees of the CHPEA. Any such activities involving the City or its agents is prohibited, unless permitted under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act or the City’s Employer/Employee Relations Policy.

ARTICLE 4 EMPLOYER SECURITY
The Association agrees that during the term of this Memorandum of Understanding the CHPEA, its agents, nor any bargaining unit employee shall participate, engage, encourage, sanction, or support any of the following:

Strikes;
Mass resignations;
Mass absenteeism;
Picketing which would involve suspension of or interference with normal work of this department; or
Any other similar actions, which precludes the department from carrying out its functions or obligations.

Violation of this section of the agreement shall be grounds for discipline.

ARTICLE 5 MANAGEMENT RIGHTS
The City hereby retains and reserves unto itself, without limitation, all powers, rights, authority, duties and responsibilities conferred upon and vested in it by the laws of the Constitution of the State of California, and of the United States, including but not limiting the generality of the foregoing, the right:

To set standards and levels of service;
To determine the procedures and standards of selection for employment; To assign work to and direct its employees;
To determine the methods and means to relieve its employees from duty because of lack of funds or other lawful reasons;
To determine the methods, means and numbers and kinds of personnel by which City operations are to be conducted, including the right to contract or subcontract bargaining unit work provided that the City will meet and confer in advance on the impact of subcontracting on workload and safety and any other matter within the scope of representation; To determine methods of financing;
To determine size and composition of the work force and allocate and assign work by which the City operations are to be conducted;
To determine and change the number of locations, relocations and types of operations, processes and materials to be used in carrying out all City functions; To make all decisions relating to merit, necessity or organization of City service; To discharge, suspend, demote, reprimand, or otherwise discipline employees for just cause in accordance with applicable laws;
To establish employee’s performance standards including, but not limited to, quality and standards, and to require compliance therewith;
To take necessary actions to carry out its mission in emergencies; and To exercise complete control and discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its work.

ITEM 19
The exercise of the foregoing powers, rights, authority, duties, and responsibilities by the City, the adoption of policies, rules, regulations and practices in furtherance thereof, and the use of judgment and discretion in connection therewith shall be limited only by the specific and express terms of this Memorandum and then only to the extent such specific and express terms hereof are in conformance with the Constitution and laws of the United States and the Constitution and laws of the State of California.

Nothing herein shall be deemed as a waiver by the Citrus Heights Police Employees’ Association or its Members of rights granted under Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Government Code Sections 3500-3511, as amended).

ARTICLE 6 DELIVERY OF POLICE SERVICES
SECTION 6.1 DELIVERY OF POLICE SERVICES
The delivery of police services in the most efficient and effective manner is of mutual importance and interest to both the CHPEA and the City. Work procedures, schedules, and assignments for improving services shall be established and revised from time to time in accordance with this agreement.

SECTION 6.2 VEHICLE READINESS
Employees in the classifications of Community Services Officers, Code Enforcement, Crime Scene/Property and Evidence Specialists, and Animal Services Officers, shall be afforded the opportunity to ready vehicles as follows:

Members shall arrive for the beginning of their shift on time and in uniform. On the first and subsequent shifts of their workweek, employees in the classifications listed above after reporting for duty to their assigned supervisor, will be allowed ten (10) minutes to set up and prepare their assigned vehicle.

ARTICLE 7 WORK RULES – EXISTING BENEFITS
SECTION 7.1 MAINTENANCE OF BENEFITS
Unless specifically provided for in this MOU, nothing should be deemed to have eliminated or superseded a benefit in an existing policy, rule or binding past practice.

SECTION 7.2 PRIMACY OF AGREEMENT
The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall have control over ordinances and resolutions of the governing body of the City where there is a conflict with a provision of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 8 ASSOCIATION BUSINESS AND MEETINGS
SECTION 8.1 ASSOCIATION MEETINGS
The City will allow elected CHPEA Board Members who are scheduled to work during predetermined Board and Membership meetings release time to attend scheduled Board and Membership meetings, with a minimum of fourteen (14) days prior notice given to the City, for up to two (2) hours per month, except in cases of emergency, in which the impact of staffing would not permit the Police Department to operate ITEM 19
safely or if the meeting conflicts with Department mandated training. On-duty personnel shall be required to monitor radio and respond in the event of an emergency.

SECTION 8.2 RELEASE TIME FOR IA INTERVIEWS AND GRIEVANCES The City will allow CHPEA Board Members and Shop Stewards adequate release time to represent members during internal affairs interviews and grievance meetings while on duty, except in cases of emergency in which the impact of staffing would not permit the Police Department to operate safely. This provision will apply to one representative per involved member. Employees will not receive pay for offduty time spent performing these Association representative duties.

SECTION 8.3 TIME OFF FOR ASSOCIATION TRAINING AND CONFERENCES The City will allow CHPEA Board Members to utilize their accrued time off to attend Association training and conferences of State and/or National Law Enforcement Associations, under the same terms and conditions required for all other time-off requests.

SECTION 8.4 MANAGEMENT LABOR MEETINGS
Employees who would otherwise be working their assigned shift shall be released from their regular duties to attend meet and confer, negotiation and other labor-management meetings, and will be paid for this time during their assigned shift as if they were performing their regular duties. The intent of this section is not to create overtime for any CHPEA member. This article is not subject to grievance.

SECTION 8.5 LIST OF CHPEA BOARD MEMBERS AND SHOP STEWARDS On January 1st of each year, the CHPEA shall provide the City with a list of the elected Board Members of the CHPEA, and any members who are assigned as Shop Stewards. The CHPEA may update this list as new members are appointed to the Board or to steward positions.

SECTION 8.6 ASSOCIATION COMMUNICATION
The City shall provide a location in the Department where a bulletin board may be placed at CHPEA’s expense to post association business documents. The City shall allow the use of the internal email system for notices of meetings. The City shall allow the use of any City facility that the public may use for the holding of association meetings, with the same reservation and use requirements.

ARTICLE 9 MEMBERS RIGHTS
SECTION 9.1 PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE
All CHPEA represented employees shall be treated fairly and equitably during internal investigations.

CHPEA represented employees will be presumed innocent of all allegations until proven otherwise. This article shall not be interpreted to be related to the application of administrative leave by the Department.

This article is not subject to grievance.

ARTICLE 10 DISCIPLINE
SECTION 10.1 PROCEDURE
Disciplinary matters shall be handled in accordance with applicable provisions from the Citrus Heights Personnel Rules and Regulations and the Citrus Heights Police Department Policy Manual.

SECTION 10.2 DISCIPLINARY APPEAL – MAJOR DISCIPLINE
When major discipline action, as defined in Citrus Heights Personnel Rules and Regulations §6.4, has been taken, the employee shall continue to have the right to appeal. All matters will be referred to the Office of ITEM 19
Administrative Hearings in Sacramento, California. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will be the hearing officer and will prepare an advisory recommendation following the evidentiary hearing. The written advisory recommendation will be sent to the City Manager for final ruling. The parties will have the opportunity to meet following receipt of the advisory recommendation. The City Manager shall send his/her final decision of written findings and decision, along with a proof of service of mailing, to each of the parties and each of the parties’ representatives within twenty (20) working days of the receipt of the ALJ’s recommendation.

The City Manager’s decision shall be final, subject only to review by a judicial administrative writ of mandamus action.

SECTION 10.3 INTERNAL AFFAIRS
The Chief of Police shall designate an investigator to perform internal affairs investigations, and they shall be performed in the most expeditious manner possible.

ARTICLE 11 SALARY
SECTION 11.1 RATES OF PAY DEFINED
Base Rate of Pay - Base rate of pay shall be defined as the base hourly rate of pay that an employee receives in the salary step system.

Regular Rate of Pay - Regular rate of pay shall be as defined by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), i.e., as the employee’s base hourly rate of pay, plus all required additional compensation converted to an hourly rate.

SECTION 11.2 OVERTIME
Contract Overtime
Contract Overtime for full-time employees shall be paid for any hours worked outside an employee's regularly scheduled work hours (payments made for time off using annual leave, compensatory time, longterm medical leave, etc. are considered “hours worked” for purposes of Contract Overtime). For part-time employees, all overtime shall be paid only for hours actually worked in excess of forty (40) hours during the applicable seven (7) -day workweek.

Contract Overtime shall be compensated at a rate of one and one-half (1.5) times the employee's base rate of pay unless the employee’s total compensation for the work week falls below the minimum threshold under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). .In the latter instance, overtime shall be calculated pursuant to the FLSA for all hours actually worked over forty (40) in a work week (see FLSA Overtime).

At the end of each pay period, total compensation will be calculated based on the Contract Overtime provision of this MOU, and the weekly overtime provisions of the FLSA (FLSA Overtime). Should the calculated total compensation under the provisions of the FLSA be greater than the calculated total ITEM 19
compensation that includes Contract Overtime, an adjusting entry shall be made, and the employee will receive the greater amount.

FLSA Overtime
Hours Worked: FLSA overtime shall be paid for hours actually worked in excess of forty (40) hours during the applicable seven (7) day workweek. Payments made for time off (annual leave, compensatory time, long-term medical, and any other exclusion under the FLSA) are not considered “hours worked”.

Regular Rate of Pay: The regular rate of pay for purposes of calculating FLSA overtime compensation is expressed as an hourly rate and is the average hourly rate of all compensation an employee earns in a workweek or work period excluding extra compensation paid for overtime hours. The regular rate of pay includes “all remuneration for employment paid to, or on behalf of, the employee” except payments that are specifically excluded under the FLSA.

FLSA overtime shall be calculated as one-half (0.5) times the regular rate of pay for all hours actually worked in excess of forty (40) hours in the workweek, in addition to all straight-time compensation already received for those hours.

For example:

Employee A works 40 hours in the workweek. Their base rate of pay is $50 per hour. They also receive $150 for Education Incentive and $150 for Cash-In-Lieu of the medical plan. The employee works 6 hours of overtime that week.

Their regular rate calculation is:

Total Remuneration for the week: 46 x $50 = $2,300 + $150 + $150 = $2,600 Divided by total hours worked: $2,600/46 = $56.52
Employee’s Regular Rate of Pay: $56.52
FLSA Calculation Method
Their total compensation, including FLSA Overtime for the week is:
46 x $56.52 = $2,599.92
6 x $56.52 x .5 = $ 169.56
$2,769.48
Advance Authorization: Overtime work must receive prior authorization from the Police Chief or an authorized designee.

SECTION 11.3 SALARY ADMINISTRATION
The City has a ten (10) step pay system with the difference between each successive step being approximately two and one-half percent (2.5%). The ten (10) steps pay system will be based on the current maximum salary range for step 10. Employees will advance to the next step in the step compensation schedule effective with the pay period in which their position anniversary date falls based upon satisfactory job performance.

SECTION 11.4 SALARY ADJUSTMENTS
ITEM 19
Effective the first full pay period in July 2026, the represented classifications will receive the following equity adjustments to be brought to the comparable market median:

Code Enforcement Officer I/II n/a
Community Services Officer I/II 0.77%
Crime Scene/Property and Evidence Specialist I/II 0.77% Police Crime Analyst 1.11%
Police Dispatcher I/II n/a
Police Records Technician n/a
Effective the first full pay period in July 2026, all represented classifications will receive a base salary increase of three and eight tenths’ percent (3.8%) Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA).

Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2027, COLA (2-4%) based on April 12-month CPI-U San Francisco/San Jose/Hayward for all members.

Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2028, 1) COLA (2-4%) based on April 12-month CPIU San Francisco/San Jose/Hayward for all members, and 2) City and Association agreed-upon Market Equity Adjustments from the “Limited Reopener”, as follows:

LIMITED REOPENER: Prior to July 1, 2028, the City will refresh the 2026 Bryce Consulting Compensation Study to include updated information, including, where available, salary data effective July 1, 2028. The updated compensation study will be provided to the parties no later than April 1, 2028, for purposes of this reopener.

The City and the Association agree to meet and confer regarding: (1) Section 11.4 (Salary Adjustments), as it specifically relates to potential Market Equity adjustments; and (2) Section 25.1 (Health Benefit), as it specifically relates to the City’s maximum contribution to an employee’s health plan.

Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2029, COLA (2-4%) based on April 12-month CPI-U San Francisco/San Jose/Hayward for all members.

SECTION 11.5 ADVANCEMENT FROM ENTRY LEVEL TO JOURNEY LEVEL WITHIN

CLASSIFICATION
Employees hired into the entry level classification of Community Services Officer I, Crime Scene/Property and Evidence Specialist I, Police Dispatcher I, Code Enforcement Officer I, and Animal Services Officer I shall advance automatically, on the beginning of the pay period that their anniversary date falls within, to the journey level II classification after the successful completion of twenty-four (24) months of service at the entry level I classification and an overall evaluation rating of “meets expectations or higher”. An employee that advances from an entry level I classification to the journey level II classification will remain at the same step level on the journey level classification band, which constitutes an approximately ten percent (10%) salary increase, until the employee advances to the next salary step at the beginning of the pay period of which their anniversary date falls within, until they reach top step.

ARTICLE 12 SENIORITY FOR ANNUAL LEAVE SELECTION AND

SHIFT BID
SECTION 12.1 SENIORITY DEFINED/PURPOSE
ITEM 19
For purposes of this Article, seniority is defined as the date of hire as a benefited employee into a classification represented by CHPEA. However, seniority resets upon moving from one classification to another within the Police Department, except when moving from an entry level I classification to the journey level II classification. Seniority will be used to bid for shifts (days/swings/graves) and annual leave selection during the normal shift bid cycle.

SECTION 12.2 PROCEDURE FOR ANNUAL LEAVE SELECTION
Members will select their sabbatical and/or annual leave in accordance with seniority as that term is defined directly above, consistent with the scheduling ability of their unit. Sabbatical and/or Annual Leave selection will occur only upon completion of the unit’s shift bid process. Members who enjoy both the sabbatical and annual leave benefit may utilize their seniority for one leave selection and will fall to the bottom of the list to pick the other. Any of these leaves may be adjusted or rescheduled in the event of exigent circumstances or staffing related emergencies.

SECTION 12.3 TIES IN HIRE DATE
If applicable, ties in hire date will be decided based on years of employment at the City. For employees hired by the City on the same date with no prior law enforcement experience, ties in hire date will be decided once by random drawing. For employees hired by the City on the same date with prior law enforcement experience, ties in hire date will be decided by total law enforcement experience within the classification.

SECTION 12.4 TEMPORARY REASSIGNMENT
The Chief of Police has the right to make temporary reassignments of employees, not to exceed 90 days, based on Departmental needs. This reassignment is not punitive. This article is not subject to grievance.

ARTICLE 13 SPECIAL COMPENSATION
The City and the Association understand that Special Compensation may be reportable under Article 4, Section 571 and 571.1 of Chapter 2 of Division 1 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations. However, the City and the Association mutually understand and agree that the determination of reportable special compensation is at the sole discretion of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the City shall not be liable for compensation reportable decisions made by CalPERS.

SECTION 13.1 COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING OFFICER (CTO) PAY – TRAINING PREMIUM The City reserves the right to determine the need for and to assign employees to serve as Communications Training Officers (CTO). Employees who are assigned as CTO’s shall receive five percent (5%) of their base rate of pay for each hour worked as a CTO and for the full shift if the employee spends fifty percent (50%) or more of their shift performing CTO duties.

SECTION 13.2 TRAINING ASSIGNMENT PAY – TRAINING PREMIUM All employees in the classifications other than Police Dispatcher who do not have a Senior classification title may be designated as trainers by the Police Chief or designee on an as needed basis. Those designated as trainers shall receive five percent (5%) of their base rate of pay for each hour worked training and for the full shift if the employee spends fifty percent (50%) or more of their shift performing training duties.

This section only applies to employees who train other employees.

SECTION 13.3 ACTING SUPERVISOR PAY
The City shall pay any employee designated by the Department to serve in the capacity of acting supervisor five percent (5%) of the base rate of pay for all hours worked in that capacity. This is separate and distinct from out-of-class pay.

ITEM 19
SECTION 13.4 BILINGUAL PAY – BILINGUAL PREMIUM
The City shall pay a bilingual pay incentive to CHPEA members an amount of $100 per month above the employee’s base rate of pay for employees certified by Human Resources as Spanish or Slavic speaking.

These employees will be routinely and consistently assigned to positions requiring communications skills in Spanish or Slavic languages based upon operational needs as determined by the City. Employees are required to pass a proficiency test. The bilingual pay incentive would also apply to Employees passing a proficiency assessment in American Sign Language. This premium is provided for the performance of assigned bilingual duties, not merely for the possession of a certificate.

Bilingual pay does not compound. Bilingual Pay is designated as Special Assignment Pay under 2 CCR §571.1(b)(3). Bilingual pay for American Sign Language is not reportable to CalPERS as special compensation because it is not an approved category of special compensation.

ARTICLE 14 EDUCATION
SECTION 14.1 EDUCATION INCENTIVE PAY
The City shall pay an education incentive of up to a maximum of two and one-half percent (2.5%) of base salary for possession of the following advanced education, degrees and certificates:

2.5% for AA/AS Degree or equivalent

2.5% for Intermediate POST

2.5% for BA/BS Degree

2.5% for Advanced Post
Educational Incentive pay shall not apply to classifications that require the advanced education, degree or certificate as part of the classification's minimum job requirements or where the advanced education, degree or certificate does not enhance the employee's ability to do their job.

The classification of Police Dispatcher shall receive the above educational incentives to a maximum of seven and one-half percent (7.5%).

The City and the Association understand that Education Incentive Pay is reportable under 2 CCR §571(a)(2) and §571.1(b)(2). However, the City and the Association mutually understand and agree that the determination of reportable Education Incentive Pay is at the sole discretion of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the City shall not be liable for compensation reportable decisions made by CalPERS.

SECTION 14.2 TRAINING
Employees attending city approved training will be paid for the scheduled time of the class. Travel time shall be paid in accordance with CHPD Lexipol Policy. Employees will have the option of using a city vehicle (if one is available for use) or driving their personal vehicle. If using a personal vehicle, the employee will be reimbursed for mileage at the city rate. The employee’s regular commute distance from their residence to work shall be deducted from the mileage if the employee drives directly to training from their residence.

ARTICLE 15 COURT
SECTION 15.1 COURT STANDBY
ITEM 19
Employees shall receive two (2) hours of straight time at the base rate of pay for each day assigned to Court Standby time while off duty. However, the employee shall not be eligible for this standby pay if the employee also reports for a court appearance that day. Standby and Court appearance pay will not be paid for the same court proceeding on the same day. To be notified status does not qualify for Court Standby Pay.

SECTION 15.2 COURT APPEARANCE – OUTSIDE OF SCHEDULED WORK HOURS Employees required to attend court outside of their scheduled work hours related to actions taken as an employee of the City of Citrus Heights shall receive the following compensation:

Required in court more than two hours outside of a scheduled shift– four (4) hours minimum at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the base rate of pay.

Required in court less than two hours outside of a scheduled shift – two (2) hours minimum at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the base rate of pay.

Any employee who receives an a.m. subpoena more than four (4) hours prior to a p.m. subpoena, shall receive the applicable minimum overtime for each subpoena, regardless of length of appearance.

Any employee ordered to return after the court’s lunch break will receive compensation during the break period.

ARTICLE 16 CALL BACK PAY
CHPEA members, who are required to report for duty other than a scheduled shift, will be compensated four (4) hours at one and one-half (1-1/2) times their base rate of pay. A continuation or extension of a shift, as defined below, is not considered “Call Back” for the purpose of this section.

Shift Continuation: If called to report to their assigned shift thirty (30) minutes or less prior to the beginning of a shift, the employee will be compensated at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the base rate of pay.

Shift Extensions: Employees will be compensated at the rate of one and one- half (1-1/2) times the base rate of pay for hours worked after the end of their shifts.

ARTICLE 17 ON-CALL PAY
Employees required to remain in an on-call status shall receive one (1) hour of straight time pay for onduty days and two (2) hours of straight time pay for off-duty days. On-call pay will be paid in addition to applicable call back pay.

On-Call duty requires that the employee:

Be ready to respond to calls for service;
Be available by phone, email, or radio; and
Refrain from activities, which might impair the employee’s ability to perform their assigned duties.

ARTICLE 18 SCHEDULES
SECTION 18.1 WORK SHIFTS AND WORK SCHEDULES
The Police Chief or designee shall establish work shifts and work schedules for all employees based on operational needs. The Police Chief, or designee, may change an employee’s schedule with seven (7) days’ notice, unless an emergency exists that requires schedule change. Non-emergency schedule changes with less than seven (7) days’ notice shall result in overtime compensation for the first full shift of the changed ITEM 19
schedule. Nothing in this section is meant to prohibit a schedule change as a result of a mutual agreement between the employee and the Police Chief or designee.

Due to the unique requirements of training, this section will not apply to members until after they have completed the initial training program.

SECTION 18.2 POLICE DISPATCHER WORK SCHEDULES
Notwithstanding Section 18.1 above, effective as soon as administratively feasible, but no later than January 1, 2024, the Police Dispatchers 3/12 work schedule shall consist of six (6) / twelve (12) hour workdays and one (1) eight (8) hour workday over a two-week work period. The eight (8) hour workday will remain the same day every other week. All days off in a workweek will be consecutive. Shift bidding will occur prior to the forty (40) hour schedule change and shifts will be selected pursuant to Article 12.

SECTION 18.3 POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN SCHEDULES
Notwithstanding Section 18.1 above, effective as soon as administratively feasible, but no later than January 1, 2024, the Police Records Assistant I and II classifications will be reclassified to the Police Records Technician classification and their work schedule will change from the four (4) nine (9) hour workdays to a four (4) ten (10) hour workdays each week. All days off in a workweek will be consecutive.

ARTICLE 19 EXTENSION OF PROBATION
CHPEA represented employees shall only have their eighteen (18) month probationary period extended due to a time period of longer than thirty (30) days during the member’s probation based on a leave of absence or other restricted light duty during which the member was not performing the full regular duties of his/her position - including patrol duties - on a continuous basis. In such circumstance, the employee’s probationary period will be extended for the same length of time as he/she did not perform the regular duties of the position.

ARTICLE 20 RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The City contracts with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) for retirement benefits for eligible employees. All employees regardless of hire date, pay the member contribution rate as determined by CalPERS. The retirement formula is determined by an employee’s date of hire, classification and status with CalPERS.

CHPEA Employees subject to the provisions of the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) shall be eligible for the 2% @ 62 retirement formula, three-year average compensation method, as defined by the PEPRA legislation.

CHPEA Employees determined by CalPERS to be classic members, hired by Citrus Heights Police Department on or after August 15, 2011, shall be eligible for the 2% @ 55 retirement formula, three-year average compensation method.

CHPEA Employees hired prior to August 15, 2011, shall be eligible for the 2.7% @ 55 retirement formula, single highest year compensation method.

CalPERS has the final determination regarding determining an employee’s status with CalPERS.

ARTICLE 21 PERSONNEL FILES
ITEM 19
Employees may request access to his/her own personnel file(s) to the extent provided by law. Employees seeking the removal of any item from their personnel file shall file a written request to the Chief of Police through the chain of command. Employees may be restricted from accessing files containing ongoing Internal Affairs investigations to the extent that it could jeopardize or compromise the investigation pending final disposition or notice to the employee of the intent to discipline or confidential portions of Internal Affairs files which have not been sustained against the employee.

ARTICLE 22 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
Grievances will be handled in accordance with the “Grievance Procedure” in the Citrus Heights Police Department Policy Manual (currently Policy 1007).

ARTICLE 23 HOLIDAY/LEAVE TIME
SECTION 23.1 HOLIDAYS
The City generally observes 12 holidays when the offices are closed. Two (2) floating holidays are also credited to employees at the beginning of each calendar year.

Holiday benefits are provided as follows:

Communications Employees
Communications employees are provided with seven and a half percent (7.5%) of base salary holiday pay in-lieu of observing holidays.

Patrol CSOs
Patrol CSOs assigned to active patrol duties will receive the Mini Sabbatical benefit in lieu of observing holidays.

The Mini Sabbatical is four continuous weeks of paid leave. The Mini Sabbatical is not an allotment of additional hours to be used in the same manner as Annual Leave. 160 hours (4 weeks of paid time off based on regularly scheduled hours worked per week) are banked as Sabbatical to be used in annual mini-sabbatical bundle. The 160 hours is calculated by taking 12 holidays times 8 hours times 1.5 (overtime – assuming holidays are worked) plus 16 floating holiday hours equals 160 hours ((12 x 8 x 1.5) + 16) = 160. Sabbatical hours are not eligible for cash out. The hours are only accessible for use during the mandatory sabbatical. On July 1 of each year, the sabbatical schedule is determined and hours will be available for use during the fiscal year based on the sabbatical schedule. The sabbatical schedule can be modified at the Chief of Police’s discretion.

Non-Patrol CSOs and Records Employees
CSOs not assigned to patrol and records employees shall observe standard holidays. These employees will receive eight hours of paid leave when a holiday falls on or is observed on a scheduled work day. If an employee’s shift is longer than eight hours, the employee may use accrued annual leave to make up the difference between the eight hours of paid holiday leave and the full shift. If a holiday falls on or is observed on a non-scheduled work day, the employee will accrue eight hours of holiday leave.

ITEM 19
SECTION 23.3 ANNUAL LEAVE
Employees shall accrue annual leave as follows:

Years of Service Annual Accrual Maximum Accrual
Hire date -Year 4 136 272
Year 5 - Year 9 160 320
Year 10-Year 14 184 368
Year 15-Year 19 200 400
Year 20-Beyond 240 480
Once the maximum accrual limit has been reached, the Annual Leave accrual hours will be added to the Long-Term Medical Leave hours until the employee utilizes the Annual Leave hours thereby reducing the balance below the maximum accrual limit. At no time may an employee’s Annual Leave hours exceed the maximum accrual limit.

For purposes of this section, “years of service” includes an employee’s years of service at their most recent law enforcement employer.

SECTION 23.4 LONG TERM MEDICAL LEAVE
Employees accrue a total of 40 hours of Long-Term Medical Leave per year beginning on the date of hire.

Long Term Medical Leave may be used for an illness or injury requiring the employee to be absent from work. An employee becomes eligible to use this leave only after he/she has utilized 24 hours of accrued leave.

A medical certification may be required. Employees may use their Long-Term Medical Leave for themselves or to care for their immediate family. Unused Long Term Medical Leave is not paid out upon termination of employment.

SECTION 23.5 BEREAVEMENT LEAVE
On the date of hire, full-time employees are entitled to five (5) unpaid days of Bereavement Leave per event due to the death of an eligible family member within thirty (30) days of service. The City will provide fulltime employees with twenty-four (24) hours of Bereavement Leave per event due to the death of an eligible family member. The employee shall give notice to their immediate supervisor prior to taking such leave.

The city shall authorize bereavement leave with pay for employees, when needed, due to the death of an eligible family member. An employee’s leave must occur within three (3) months of the date of death and does not need to be taken consecutively. For purposes of this policy, “eligible family member” includes:

Spouse
Child (including step)
Parent (including in-laws, foster, step and adoptive)
Sibling (including step-siblings)
Grandparent (including step)
Grandchild (including step)
Registered Domestic Partner (including parents of registered domestic partner) Child of registered domestic partner
A person who stood “in loco parentis” to an employee when the employee was a child ARTICLE 24 UNIFORMS
ITEM 19
SECTION 24.1 UNIFORMS
The City will provide new uniforms for CHPEA represented employees at no cost to the employee.

Damaged or worn uniforms will be repaired or replaced with supervisor approval.

SECTION 24.2 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE BENEFIT
The City shall report a uniform allowance benefit at the appropriate rate biweekly to CalPERS for eligible employees as determined by CalPERS. Eligible employees shall be required to pay the employee contribution rate on the value of the uniform allowance benefit.

The Uniform Benefit is determined by the employee’s classification per the following table:

Group Annual Bi-Weekly
CSI/CSO/CEO/ $494.00 $19.00
Records $104.00 $4.00
Dispatch $104.00 $4.00
Animal Services Officers $390.00 $15.00
ARTICLE 25 HEALTH/WELFARE BENEFITS
SECTION 25.1 HEALTH BENEFIT
Effective August 1, 2026, the City will pay up to the following monthly amounts toward health insurance premiums:

Employee only - $1,150.00
Employee Plus One - $2,350.00
Employee Plus Family - $3,050.00
If an employee has qualifying outside health insurance coverage through a spouse, domestic partner or alternative retirement, the employee can cash-out six hundred dollars ($600.00) per month or add this amount to deferred compensation, plus two hundred dollars ($200) will be contributed by the City to a Health Reimbursement Account (HRA) or deferred compensation (457) plan.

SECTION 25.2 DENTAL INSURANCE
The City shall provide dental insurance coverage for all CHPEA employees. New employees become eligible for dental benefits the first day of the month following the date of hire. Dental premiums for fulltime employees and their dependents are paid 100% by the City.

SECTION 25.3 VISION INSURANCE
The City shall provide vision insurance coverage for all CHPEA employees. New employees become eligible for vision benefits the first day of the month following the date of hire. Vision premiums for fulltime employees and their dependents are paid 100% by the City.

SECTION 25.4 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT
ITEM 19
The City offers employees the ability to use pre-tax dollars for (1) reimbursement of eligible medical expenses not covered by the insurance programs and for (2) dependent care. These two programs are called the “Medical Reimbursement Program” and the “Dependent Care Program”.

New employees shall become eligible to participate in the medical reimbursement program six months following the date of hire and become eligible to participate in the dependent care reimbursement program the first day of the month following the date of hire. Election amount(s) will be deducted over 24 pay periods.

SECTION 25.5 LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE
The City shall provide long term disability insurance. New employees are enrolled into the Long-Term Disability program the first day of the month following the date of hire. The City pays for the cost of coverage. There is a 30-day waiting period; benefits are paid for the duration of a qualifying disability. Parttime regular employees working at least 20 hours per week qualify for this benefit. Since the City pays the premium on behalf of the employee, if an employee were to receive a benefit – the amount received would be taxable.

SECTION 25.6 LIFE INSURANCE
The City shall provide life insurance benefits for all CHPEA members. Basic Life Insurance/AD&D is effective on the first day of the month following the date of hire and upon the completion of the enrollment process. The City pays the premium for basic life and accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D).

Employees have the opportunity to purchase additional life insurance via a payroll deduction through the Additional Life Insurance Program for themselves, their spouse, domestic partner, and children. This is a portable benefit. Employees have a “guaranteed” amount of additional life insurance coverage that can be purchased without any review by underwriting if you apply within 31 days of becoming eligible.

SECTION 25.7 ON-DUTY PHYSICAL FITNESS PROGRAM
All Community Services Officer (CSO’s) who are assigned to records and data compliance or patrol will participate in an on-duty physical fitness program. CSO’s will receive one hour of paid time during each regularly scheduled shift to complete a forty (40) minute exercise regime.

ARTICLE 26 SEVERABILITY
Should any section, clause, or provision of this Agreement be declared illegal by final judgment by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidation of said section, clause, or provision shall not invalidate the remaining portions hereof and such remaining portions shall continue in full force and effect. In the event of such invalidation, the CHPEA and City agree to meet and confer concerning substitute provisions for any part of this Agreement rendered or declared illegal.

ARTICLE 27 TERM
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) shall be in full force and effect commencing on July 1, 2026 and ending at midnight on June 30, 2030.

ITEM 19

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS CITRUS HEIGHTS POLICE
EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION
(CHPEA) ______________________________________ ________________________________ Ashely J. Feeney, City Manager Casandra Cisneros, CHPEA President ______________________________________ ________________________________ Patrick Clark, Lead Negotiator Kristina Wicker-Estes, CHPEA Representative
Susan Talwar, Administrative Services Director
Melissa Rojas, Human Resources Manager
Approved as to form:

Ryan Jones, City Attorney
Attest:

Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 19
Printed on Recycled Paper
RESOLUTION NO. 2026 -___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS,

CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE AMENDED SALARY TABLE WITH COST OF LIVING

ADJUSTMENTS AND MARKET EQUITY ADJUSTMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Citrus Heights engages in sound economic planning practices; WHEREAS, a salary adjustment and market equity adjustments is warranted given the results of the total compensation inflationary economy and need to keep wages competitive with similarly situated jurisdictions in the local region;
WHEREAS, California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 requires governing bodies of local agencies contracting with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System to approve and adopt a payrate schedule in accordance with public meeting laws; and

WHEREAS, the payrate schedule must identify each position by title, the individual payrate amount or ranges for that position, the time base upon which the amounts are based, and track all revisions.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights hereby finds and determines the above recitals are true and correct and have served as the basis, in part, for the findings and actions of the City Council as set forth below.

The City Council hereby adopts the amended Salary Table, Exhibit A, attached to this resolution as follows:

The City Council hereby adopts the following:
• Amended Salary Table, Exhibit A, (attached to this resolution) including 3.8% cost of living adjustment to regular unrepresented positions effective July 12, 2026 • Market Equity adjustments to the benchmark classifications and their internal relationship classifications that were more than 5% below market median • Adding a new classification: Police Communications Manager and Program Technician
• Deleting unused classification of Fleet Technician, Police Services Supervisor and Police Services Manager
• Updating the minimum wage classifications
The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 8th day of July 2026 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

ITEM 19
Printed on Recycled Paper

_____________________________
MariJane Lopez-Taff, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Amy Van, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A – Amended Salary Schedule (Presented to the City Council July 8, 2026)

ITEM 19
Monthly Salary
Full-Time Unrepresented Position Titles Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Non-Exempt Exempt ACCOUNTANT $ 6,950.31 $ 7,124.07 $ 7,302.17 $ 7,484.72 $ 7,671.84 $ 7,863.64 $ 8,060.23 $ 8,261.74 $ 8,468.28 $ 8,679.98 x ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN $ 5,133.12 $ 5,261.45 $ 5,392.99 $ 5,527.81 $ 5,666.01 $ 5,807.66 $ 5,952.85 $ 6,101.67 $ 6,254.21 $ 6,410.56 x ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $ 5,315.13 $ 5,448.01 $ 5,584.21 $ 5,723.82 $ 5,866.92 $ 6,013.59 $ 6,163.93 $ 6,318.03 $ 6,475.98 $ 6,637.87 x ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN $ 5,846.64 $ 5,992.81 $ 6,142.63 $ 6,296.20 $ 6,453.60 $ 6,614.94 $ 6,780.31 $ 6,949.82 $ 7,123.57 $ 7,301.66 x ASSISTANT ENGINEER $ 7,060.57 $ 7,237.08 $ 7,418.01 $ 7,603.46 $ 7,793.55 $ 7,988.39 $ 8,188.10 $ 8,392.80 $ 8,602.62 $ 8,817.68 x ASSISTANT PLANNER $ 6,566.19 $ 6,730.34 $ 6,898.60 $ 7,071.06 $ 7,247.84 $ 7,429.04 $ 7,614.77 $ 7,805.14 $ 8,000.27 $ 8,200.28 x ASSOCIATE CIVIL ENGINEER $ 8,543.30 $ 8,756.88 $ 8,975.80 $ 9,200.20 $ 9,430.20 $ 9,665.95 $ 9,907.60 $ 10,155.29 $ 10,409.17 $ 10,669.40 x ASSOCIATE ENGINEER $ 7,766.62 $ 7,960.79 $ 8,159.81 $ 8,363.81 $ 8,572.91 $ 8,787.23 $ 9,006.91 $ 9,232.08 $ 9,462.88 $ 9,699.45 x ASSOCIATE PLANNER $ 7,222.82 $ 7,403.39 $ 7,588.47 $ 7,778.18 $ 7,972.63 $ 8,171.95 $ 8,376.25 $ 8,585.66 $ 8,800.30 $ 9,020.30 x BUILDING INSPECTOR I $ 6,060.00 $ 6,211.50 $ 6,366.79 $ 6,525.96 $ 6,689.11 $ 6,856.34 $ 7,027.75 $ 7,203.44 $ 7,383.53 $ 7,568.12 x BUILDING INSPECTOR II $ 6,666.01 $ 6,832.66 $ 7,003.48 $ 7,178.57 $ 7,358.03 $ 7,541.98 $ 7,730.53 $ 7,923.79 $ 8,121.88 $ 8,324.93 x CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL $ 10,891.94 $ 11,164.24 $ 11,443.35 $ 11,729.43 $ 12,022.67 $ 12,323.24 $ 12,631.32 $ 12,947.10 $ 13,270.78 $ 13,602.55 x CITY CLERK $ 11,043.81 $ 11,319.91 $ 11,602.91 $ 11,892.98 $ 12,190.30 $ 12,495.06 $ 12,807.44 $ 13,127.63 $ 13,455.82 $ 13,792.22 x CITY ENGINEER $ 12,723.38 $ 13,041.46 $ 13,367.50 $ 13,701.69 $ 14,044.23 $ 14,395.34 $ 14,755.22 $ 15,124.10 $ 15,502.20 $ 15,889.75 x COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER $ 7,644.96 $ 7,836.08 $ 8,031.98 $ 8,232.78 $ 8,438.60 $ 8,649.56 $ 8,865.80 $ 9,087.45 $ 9,314.64 $ 9,547.51 x CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE INSPECTOR I $ 5,765.53 $ 5,909.67 $ 6,057.41 $ 6,208.85 $ 6,364.07 $ 6,523.17 $ 6,686.25 $ 6,853.41 $ 7,024.75 $ 7,200.37 x CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE INSPECTOR II $ 6,342.09 $ 6,500.64 $ 6,663.16 $ 6,829.74 $ 7,000.48 $ 7,175.49 $ 7,354.88 $ 7,538.75 $ 7,727.22 $ 7,920.41 x CONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE INSPECTOR SUPERVISOR $ 8,878.93 $ 9,100.90 $ 9,328.42 $ 9,561.63 $ 9,800.67 $ 10,045.69 $ 10,296.83 $ 10,554.25 $ 10,818.11 $ 11,088.57 x CUSTODIAN $ 3,488.65 $ 3,575.87 $ 3,665.27 $ 3,756.90 $ 3,850.82 $ 3,947.09 $ 4,045.77 $ 4,146.91 $ 4,250.58 $ 4,356.84 x CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE $ 4,088.86 $ 4,191.08 $ 4,295.86 $ 4,403.26 $ 4,513.34 $ 4,626.17 $ 4,741.82 $ 4,860.37 $ 4,981.88 $ 5,106.43 x DATABASE & APPLICATIONS ANALYST $ 8,528.20 $ 8,741.41 $ 8,959.95 $ 9,183.95 $ 9,413.55 $ 9,648.89 $ 9,890.11 $ 10,137.36 $ 10,390.79 $ 10,650.56 x DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICIAN I $ 4,918.37 $ 5,041.33 $ 5,167.36 $ 5,296.54 $ 5,428.95 $ 5,564.67 $ 5,703.79 $ 5,846.38 $ 5,992.54 $ 6,142.36 x DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICIAN II $ 5,410.20 $ 5,545.45 $ 5,684.09 $ 5,826.19 $ 5,971.84 $ 6,121.14 $ 6,274.17 $ 6,431.02 $ 6,591.80 $ 6,756.59 x ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I $ 5,556.24 $ 5,695.15 $ 5,837.53 $ 5,983.47 $ 6,133.06 $ 6,286.39 $ 6,443.55 $ 6,604.64 $ 6,769.76 $ 6,939.00 x ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN II $ 6,111.87 $ 6,264.67 $ 6,421.29 $ 6,581.82 $ 6,746.37 $ 6,915.03 $ 7,087.91 $ 7,265.11 $ 7,446.74 $ 7,632.90 x EVENTS & COMMUNITY CENTER TECHNICIAN $ 5,315.13 $ 5,448.01 $ 5,584.21 $ 5,723.82 $ 5,866.92 $ 6,013.59 $ 6,163.93 $ 6,318.03 $ 6,475.98 $ 6,637.87 x EVENTS & COMMUNITY CENTER SUPERVISOR $ 8,079.00 $ 8,280.98 $ 8,488.00 $ 8,700.20 $ 8,917.71 $ 9,140.65 $ 9,369.17 $ 9,603.40 $ 9,843.48 $ 10,089.57 x EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT $ 6,431.32 $ 6,592.10 $ 6,756.90 $ 6,925.82 $ 7,098.97 $ 7,276.44 $ 7,458.35 $ 7,644.81 $ 7,835.93 $ 8,031.83 x FACILITIES AND FLEET SUPERVISOR $ 8,738.38 $ 8,956.84 $ 9,180.76 $ 9,410.28 $ 9,645.54 $ 9,886.68 $ 10,133.85 $ 10,387.20 $ 10,646.88 $ 10,913.05 x FINANCE MANAGER $ 11,043.81 $ 11,319.91 $ 11,602.91 $ 11,892.98 $ 12,190.30 $ 12,495.06 $ 12,807.44 $ 13,127.63 $ 13,455.82 $ 13,792.22 x HOUSING & HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM COORDINATOR $ 8,791.71 $ 9,011.50 $ 9,236.79 $ 9,467.71 $ 9,704.40 $ 9,947.01 $ 10,195.69 $ 10,450.58 $ 10,711.84 $ 10,979.63 x HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER $ 11,299.17 $ 11,581.65 $ 11,871.19 $ 12,167.97 $ 12,472.17 $ 12,783.97 $ 13,103.57 $ 13,431.16 $ 13,766.94 $ 14,111.11 x HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN $ 6,214.43 $ 6,369.79 $ 6,529.03 $ 6,692.26 $ 6,859.57 $ 7,031.06 $ 7,206.84 $ 7,387.01 $ 7,571.69 $ 7,760.98 x INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SPECIALIST $ 7,231.61 $ 7,412.40 $ 7,597.71 $ 7,787.65 $ 7,982.34 $ 8,181.90 $ 8,386.45 $ 8,596.11 $ 8,811.01 $ 9,031.29 x INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST I $ 6,887.23 $ 7,059.41 $ 7,235.90 $ 7,416.80 $ 7,602.22 $ 7,792.28 $ 7,987.09 $ 8,186.77 $ 8,391.44 $ 8,601.22 x INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST II $ 7,575.97 $ 7,765.37 $ 7,959.50 $ 8,158.49 $ 8,362.45 $ 8,571.51 $ 8,785.80 $ 9,005.44 $ 9,230.58 $ 9,461.35 x INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGER $ 11,154.48 $ 11,433.34 $ 11,719.17 $ 12,012.15 $ 12,312.45 $ 12,620.26 $ 12,935.77 $ 13,259.16 $ 13,590.64 $ 13,930.41 x MAINTENANCE WORKER I $ 4,544.60 $ 4,658.22 $ 4,774.68 $ 4,894.05 $ 5,016.40 $ 5,141.81 $ 5,270.36 $ 5,402.12 $ 5,537.17 $ 5,675.60 x MAINTENANCE WORKER II $ 4,999.08 $ 5,124.06 $ 5,252.16 $ 5,383.46 $ 5,518.05 $ 5,656.00 $ 5,797.40 $ 5,942.33 $ 6,090.89 $ 6,243.16 x MANAGEMENT ANALYST I $ 6,949.96 $ 7,123.71 $ 7,301.80 $ 7,484.34 $ 7,671.45 $ 7,863.24 $ 8,059.82 $ 8,261.32 $ 8,467.85 $ 8,679.55 x MANAGEMENT ANALYST II $ 7,644.96 $ 7,836.08 $ 8,031.98 $ 8,232.78 $ 8,438.60 $ 8,649.56 $ 8,865.80 $ 9,087.45 $ 9,314.64 $ 9,547.51 x OFFICE ASSISTANT $ 3,717.15 $ 3,810.08 $ 3,905.33 $ 4,002.96 $ 4,103.03 $ 4,205.61 $ 4,310.75 $ 4,418.52 $ 4,528.98 $ 4,642.21 x OPERATIONS MANAGER $ 10,891.94 $ 11,164.24 $ 11,443.35 $ 11,729.43 $ 12,022.67 $ 12,323.24 $ 12,631.32 $ 12,947.10 $ 13,270.78 $ 13,602.55 x PLANS EXAMINER $ 7,665.91 $ 7,857.56 $ 8,054.00 $ 8,255.35 $ 8,461.73 $ 8,673.27 $ 8,890.10 $ 9,112.35 $ 9,340.16 $ 9,573.67 x POLICE COMMANDER $ 13,697.93 $ 14,040.38 $ 14,391.39 $ 14,751.17 $ 15,119.95 $ 15,497.95 $ 15,885.40 $ 16,282.54 $ 16,689.60 $ 17,106.84 x POLICE COMMUNICATIONS SUPERVISOR $ 8,387.00 $ 8,596.68 $ 8,811.60 $ 9,031.89 $ 9,257.69 $ 9,489.13 $ 9,726.36 $ 9,969.52 $ 10,218.76 $ 10,474.23 x

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS SALARY SCHEDULE
Adopted: July 8, 2026
Effective: July 12 , 2026
Approved by Resolution 2026-XX
ITEM 19
Full-Time Unrepresented Position Titles Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Non-Exempt Exempt POLICE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER $ 9,645.07 $ 9,886.20 $ 10,133.36 $ 10,386.69 $ 10,646.36 $ 10,912.52 $ 11,185.33 $ 11,464.96 $ 11,751.58 $ 12,045.37 x POLICE LIEUTENANT $ 11,736.23 $ 12,029.64 $ 12,330.38 $ 12,638.64 $ 12,954.61 $ 13,278.48 $ 13,610.44 $ 13,950.70 $ 14,299.47 $ 14,656.96 x PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER $ 10,807.25 $ 11,077.43 $ 11,354.37 $ 11,638.23 $ 11,929.19 $ 12,227.42 $ 12,533.11 $ 12,846.44 $ 13,167.60 $ 13,496.79 x PROGRAM ASSISTANT $ 4,088.86 $ 4,191.08 $ 4,295.86 $ 4,403.26 $ 4,513.34 $ 4,626.17 $ 4,741.82 $ 4,860.37 $ 4,981.88 $ 5,106.43 x PROGRAM TECHNICIAN $ 4,497.75 $ 4,610.19 $ 4,725.44 $ 4,843.58 $ 4,964.67 $ 5,088.79 $ 5,216.01 $ 5,346.41 $ 5,480.07 $ 5,617.07 x SENIOR ACCOUNTANT $ 7,992.85 $ 8,192.67 $ 8,397.49 $ 8,607.43 $ 8,822.62 $ 9,043.19 $ 9,269.27 $ 9,501.00 $ 9,738.52 $ 9,981.98 x SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR $ 7,665.91 $ 7,857.56 $ 8,054.00 $ 8,255.35 $ 8,461.73 $ 8,673.27 $ 8,890.10 $ 9,112.35 $ 9,340.16 $ 9,573.67 x SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER $ 9,824.78 $ 10,070.40 $ 10,322.16 $ 10,580.21 $ 10,844.72 $ 11,115.84 $ 11,393.74 $ 11,678.58 $ 11,970.54 $ 12,269.81 x SENIOR ENGINEER $ 9,356.94 $ 9,590.86 $ 9,830.63 $ 10,076.40 $ 10,328.31 $ 10,586.52 $ 10,851.18 $ 11,122.46 $ 11,400.52 $ 11,685.53 x SENIOR DATABASE AND APPLICATIONS ANALYST $ 9,381.02 $ 9,615.55 $ 9,855.94 $ 10,102.34 $ 10,354.90 $ 10,613.77 $ 10,879.11 $ 11,151.09 $ 11,429.87 $ 11,715.62 x SENIOR FACILITY ATTENDANT $ 3,403.56 $ 3,488.65 $ 3,575.87 $ 3,665.27 $ 3,756.90 $ 3,850.82 $ 3,947.09 $ 4,045.77 $ 4,146.91 $ 4,250.58 x SENIOR MAINTENANCE WORKER $ 5,748.95 $ 5,892.67 $ 6,039.99 $ 6,190.99 $ 6,345.76 $ 6,504.40 $ 6,667.01 $ 6,833.69 $ 7,004.53 $ 7,179.64 x SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST $ 8,791.71 $ 9,011.50 $ 9,236.79 $ 9,467.71 $ 9,704.40 $ 9,947.01 $ 10,195.69 $ 10,450.58 $ 10,711.84 $ 10,979.63 x SENIOR PAYROLL TECHNICIAN $ 6,214.43 $ 6,369.79 $ 6,529.03 $ 6,692.26 $ 6,859.57 $ 7,031.06 $ 7,206.84 $ 7,387.01 $ 7,571.69 $ 7,760.98 x SENIOR PLANNER $ 7,551.12 $ 7,739.90 $ 7,933.40 $ 8,131.73 $ 8,335.02 $ 8,543.40 $ 8,756.99 $ 8,975.91 $ 9,200.31 $ 9,430.32 x SENIOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL & LIGHTING TECHNICIAN $ 9,356.94 $ 9,590.86 $ 9,830.63 $ 10,076.40 $ 10,328.31 $ 10,586.52 $ 10,851.18 $ 11,122.46 $ 11,400.52 $ 11,685.53 x Citrus Heights Police Officers Association Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Non-Exempt Exempt POLICE OFFICER $ 7,714.78 $ 7,907.65 $ 8,105.34 $ 8,307.97 $ 8,515.67 $ 8,728.56 $ 8,946.77 $ 9,170.44 $ 9,399.70 $ 9,634.70 x POLICE SERGEANT $ 9,522.27 $ 9,760.33 $ 10,004.34 $ 10,254.45 $ 10,510.81 $ 10,773.58 $ 11,042.92 $ 11,318.99 $ 11,601.96 $ 11,892.00 x POLICE BOOKING OFFICER $ 5,980.03 $ 6,129.53 $ 6,282.77 $ 6,439.84 $ 6,600.84 $ 6,765.86 $ 6,935.01 $ 7,108.39 $ 7,286.10 $ 7,468.25 x POLICE OFFICER RECRUIT $ 7,347.40
Citrus Heights Police Employees Association Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 Non-Exempt Exempt ANIMAL SERVICES OFFICER I $ 5,217.70 $ 5,348.14 $ 5,481.84 $ 5,618.89 $ 5,759.36 $ 5,903.34 $ 6,050.92 $ 6,202.19 $ 6,357.24 $ 6,516.17 x ANIMAL SERVICES OFFICER II $ 5,739.45 $ 5,882.94 $ 6,030.01 $ 6,180.76 $ 6,335.28 $ 6,493.66 $ 6,656.00 $ 6,822.40 $ 6,992.96 $ 7,167.78 x CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I $ 5,356.70 $ 5,490.62 $ 5,627.89 $ 5,768.59 $ 5,912.80 $ 6,060.62 $ 6,212.14 $ 6,367.44 $ 6,526.63 $ 6,689.80 x CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II $ 5,892.38 $ 6,039.69 $ 6,190.68 $ 6,345.45 $ 6,504.09 $ 6,666.69 $ 6,833.36 $ 7,004.19 $ 7,179.29 $ 7,358.78 x COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER I $ 4,727.30 $ 4,845.48 $ 4,966.62 $ 5,090.79 $ 5,218.06 $ 5,348.51 $ 5,482.22 $ 5,619.28 $ 5,759.76 $ 5,903.76 x COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER II $ 5,200.04 $ 5,330.04 $ 5,463.29 $ 5,599.87 $ 5,739.87 $ 5,883.37 $ 6,030.45 $ 6,181.21 $ 6,335.74 $ 6,494.13 x CRIME SCENE/PROPERTY EVIDENCE SPECIALIST I $ 5,708.22 $ 5,850.93 $ 5,997.20 $ 6,147.13 $ 6,300.81 $ 6,458.33 $ 6,619.79 $ 6,785.28 $ 6,954.91 $ 7,128.78 x CRIME SCENE/PROPERTY EVIDENCE SPECIALIST II $ 6,279.04 $ 6,436.02 $ 6,596.92 $ 6,761.84 $ 6,930.89 $ 7,104.16 $ 7,281.76 $ 7,463.80 $ 7,650.40 $ 7,841.66 x POLICE CRIME ANALYST $ 6,995.38 $ 7,170.26 $ 7,349.52 $ 7,533.26 $ 7,721.59 $ 7,914.63 $ 8,112.50 $ 8,315.31 $ 8,523.19 $ 8,736.27 x POLICE DISPATCHER I $ 6,027.32 $ 6,178.00 $ 6,332.45 $ 6,490.76 $ 6,653.03 $ 6,819.36 $ 6,989.84 $ 7,164.59 $ 7,343.70 $ 7,527.30 x POLICE DISPATCHER II $ 6,630.05 $ 6,795.80 $ 6,965.69 $ 7,139.83 $ 7,318.33 $ 7,501.29 $ 7,688.82 $ 7,881.04 $ 8,078.07 $ 8,280.03 x POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN $ 4,852.46 $ 4,973.77 $ 5,098.11 $ 5,225.56 $ 5,356.20 $ 5,490.10 $ 5,627.35 $ 5,768.03 $ 5,912.23 $ 6,060.04 x SENIOR ANIMAL SERVICES OFFICER $ 6,600.37 $ 6,765.38 $ 6,934.51 $ 7,107.87 $ 7,285.57 $ 7,467.71 $ 7,654.40 $ 7,845.76 $ 8,041.90 $ 8,242.95 x SENIOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER $ 6,481.62 $ 6,643.66 $ 6,809.75 $ 6,979.99 $ 7,154.49 $ 7,333.35 $ 7,516.68 $ 7,704.60 $ 7,897.22 $ 8,094.65 x SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER $ 5,980.03 $ 6,129.53 $ 6,282.77 $ 6,439.84 $ 6,600.84 $ 6,765.86 $ 6,935.01 $ 7,108.39 $ 7,286.10 $ 7,468.25 x SENIOR CRIME SCENE/PROPERTY EVIDENCE SPECIALIST $ 6,906.95 $ 7,079.62 $ 7,256.61 $ 7,438.03 $ 7,623.98 $ 7,814.58 $ 8,009.94 $ 8,210.19 $ 8,415.44 $ 8,625.83 x SENIOR POLICE DISPATCHER $ 7,293.05 $ 7,475.38 $ 7,662.26 $ 7,853.82 $ 8,050.17 $ 8,251.42 $ 8,457.71 $ 8,669.15 $ 8,885.88 $ 9,108.03 x SENIOR POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN $ 5,337.68 $ 5,471.12 $ 5,607.90 $ 5,748.10 $ 5,891.80 $ 6,039.10 $ 6,190.08 $ 6,344.83 $ 6,503.45 $ 6,666.04 x Sworn (non-members of Police Officers Association)
Non-Sworn (non-members of Police Officers Association)
ITEM 19
Executive Management Range Low Range High Revision Summary ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR $ 14,183.77 $ 18,758.31 Resolution 2013-097 passed 09-04-2013; eff. 07-01-2013 CHIEF OF POLICE $ 16,138.44 $ 21,343.35 Resolution 2013-129 passed 12-13-2013; eff. pay date of 01-17-2014 CITY MANAGER $ 25,411.11 $ 25,411.11 Resolution 2014-018 passed 02-13-2014; eff. 02-13-14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR $ 14,130.45 $ 18,687.79 Resolution 2014-049 passed 06-12-2014; eff. 06-12-2014 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DIRECTOR $ 13,706.00 $ 18,126.44 Resolution 2014-118 passed 12-11-2014 Retroactive Schedule for FY 2012-2013 GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR $ 14,631.88 $ 19,350.66 Resolution 2014-122 passed 12-11-2014 eff. 12-28-2014 Resolution 2015-007 passed 01-22-2015 eff. 01-25-2015
CITY COUNCIL Resolution 2015-077 passed 07-23-2015 eff. pay date of 07-17-2015 $1,900 per month (as outlined in Government Code § 36516) effective 12/01/2024 Resolution 2015-106 passed 12-10-2015 eff. 01-01-2016 Resolution 2016-041 passed 06-23-2016 eff. pay date of 07-15-16 Extra Help Hourly Range Low Hourly Range High Resolution 2016-057 passed 07-28-2016 eff. 06-25-2016 (incl. represented) COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER - EXTRA HELP $ 27.27 $ 34.06 Resolution 2016-099 passed 12-08-2016 eff. 01-01-2017 FACILITY ATTENDANT $ 20.13 $ 25.14 Resolution 2017-026 passed 04-27-2017 eff. retroactive to 11-14-16 FACILITY ATTENDANT TRAINEE $ 16.90 $ 16.90 Resolution 2017-026 passed 04-27-2017 eff. 04-27-2017 INTERN $ 16.90 $ 16.90 Resolution 2017-065 passed 08-10-2017 eff. 08-13-2017 MANAGEMENT INTERN $ 17.60 $ 21.98 Resolution 2017-075 passed 08-24-2017 eff. 09-03-2017 POLICE DISPATCH ASSISTANT - EXTRA HELP $ 23.62 $ 29.50 Resolution 2017-087 passed 10-12-2017 eff. 10-12-2017 POLICE DISPATCHER-PER DIEM A $ 35.05 $ 35.05 Resolution 2017-090 passed 10-26-2017 eff. 10-29-2017 (incl. represented POA) POLICE DISPATCHER-PER DIEM B $ 43.43 $ 43.43 Resolution 2017-096 passed 12-14-2017 eff. 01-01-2018 POLICE DISPATCHER-PER DIEM C $ 47.77 $ 47.77 Resolution 2018-046 passed 05-24-2018 eff. retroactive to 02-17-2018 POLICE OFFICER - RESERVE III-EXTRA HELP $ 16.90 $ 20.61 Resolution 2018-117 passed 11-08-2018 eff. 11-08-2018 POLICE OFFICER - RESERVE II-EXTRA HELP $ 17.75 $ 21.64 Resolution 2018-128 passed 12-13-2018 eff. 12-23-2018 POLICE OFFICER - RESERVE I-EXTRA HELP $ 44.51 $ 55.58 Resolution 2019-017 passed 01-24-2019 eff. retroactive to 01-06-2019 POLICE OFFICER - R1 TRAINEE-EXTRA HELP $ 22.52 $ 28.13 Resolution 2019-100 passed 11-14-2019 Resolution 2019-101 passed 11-14-2019 eff. 12-22-2019
Resolution 2020-122 passed 11-12-2020 eff. 12-20-2020
Resolution 2021-013 passed 03-11-2021
Resolution 2021-075 passed 08-12-2021
Resolution 2021-087 passed 10-14-2021
Resolution 2021-101 passed 12-09-2021
Resolution 2021-112 passed 12-23-2021
Resolution 2022-059 passed 06-23-2022
Resolution 2022-095 passed 09-22-2022
Resolution 2021-087 & 2021-112 POA & PEA MOUs 2% COLA effective 09-25-2022 Resolution 2022-112 passed 11-10-2022
Resolution 2023-090 passed 09-28-2023
Resolution 2024-048 passed 06-27-2024 eff. 07/14/2024
Resolution 2025-002 passed 01-08-2025 eff. 12/29/2024
Resolution 2025-020 passed 04-09-2025 eff. 04/09/2025
Resolution 2025-039 passed 06-11-2025 eff. 07/13/2025
ITEM 19
Printed on Recycled Paper
RESOLUTION NO. 2026 -___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS,

CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE AMENDEDMENTS TO THE EMPLOYER

CONTRIBUTION LEVEL FOR THE EMPLOYEE HELATH BENEFITS
WHEREAS, the City of Citrus Heights engages in sound economic planning practices; WHEREAS, the City regularly completes a review of its total compensation and benefits package, financial status and budget projections for the upcoming year;

WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Citrus Heights establishes the contribution level for employee health benefits for employees for the City of Citrus Heights; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights does hereby adopt the modifications to the city’s health insurance contributions as follows:

Change in city health insurance contributions as follows:
• City Medical Plan Contribution – Effective August 1, 2026:
o Employee Only – up to $1,150 per month
o Employee Plus One – up to $2,350 per month
o Employee Plus Two or More – up to $ 3,050 per month
• In-Lieu of Medical Plan – Effective August 1, 2026:
o If an employee has proof of qualifying outside health insurance coverage, provide $800 per month* ($600 plus $200 to an employee’s Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) or deferred compensation account).
* requires proof of qualifying outside health insurance coverage through a spouse, domestic partner or alternative retirement
The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Citrus Heights, California, this 8th day of July 2026 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:

_____________________________
MariJane Lopez-Taff, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Amy Van, City Clerk
ITEM 19
Printed on Recycled Paper

ITEM 19

Citrus Heights City Council MeetingsJuly 8, 2026

Citrus Heights City Council Meetings
July 8, 2026