CLAREMONT CITY COUNCIL
MEETING MINUTES
Tuesday, July 11, 2023 —6:30 p.m.
Meeting Conducted In Person and Via Zoom. Video Recording is Archived on the City Website https://www.ci.ciaremont.ca.us/government/city-council/watch-city-cou ncil-meetings
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Reece called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
MOMENT OF SILENCE — In honor of Professor Ronald Peterson, Cal Polytechnic Pomona.
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT COUNCILMEMBER: CALAYCAY, LEANO, MEDINA (via teleconference), REECE, STARK
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBER: NONE
ALSO PRESENT Adam Pirrie, City Manager; Jamie Earl, Assistant City Manager;Alisha Patterson, City Attorney; Aaron Fate, Police Chief; Brad Johnson, Director of Community Development; Melissa Vollaro, Director of Human Services; Shelley Desautels, City Clerk
CLOSED SESSION REPORT
There was no closed session.
CEREMONIAL MATTERS, PRESENTATIONS, AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Katherine Loeser, Claremont Helen Renwick Library Manager, shared upcoming events taking place at the Library.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF FEDERAL HOLIDAYS/OBSERVANCES
Mayor Reece and City Manager Pirrie recapped the City's Fourth of July events and provided thanks to those who volunteered, sponsored, and participated.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Council Items - None
Council Assignment Reports - None
CITY MANAGER REPORT
This item starts at 7:48 p.m. in the archived video.
City Manager Pirrie invited all to the second listen and learn session on cannabis policies and regulations to be held July 20th at 8 a.m. via Zoom to share thoughts and ideas; announced the summer Movies in the Park series; National Night Out August 1st, which will include collection of
City Council Minutes
July 11, 2023
Shoes That Fit donations; Concerts in the Park; and that cooling center locations will be open due to upcoming high heat days.
PUBLIC COMMENT
This item starts at 11:19 in the archived video.
Mayor Reece invited public comment.
Bryan Trunik, provided concerns related to the Motel 6 landscaping progress and the extended timeline allowed by the City, submitted a request for correspondence between the City staff and Motel 6 for the last 5 years, and alleged inequitable treatment.
Valerie Gustaveson, inquired if the City has considered drones instead of fireworks for the 4th of July celebration.
There were no further requests to speak.
Mayor Reece closed public comment.
Director of Community Development Brad Johnson responded to City Council questions regarding concerns raised related to Motel 6 landscaping progress, lighting requirements, and other complications causing delays.
City Manager Pirrie provided contact (a)-ci.claremont.ca.us for the community to give feedback on the 4th of July, and to contact the City Clerk for an application if interested in joining the 4th of July Committee.
CONSENT CALENDAR
This item starts at 24:05 in the archived video.
Councilmember Medina removed Item No. 5 from the Consent Calendar due to a conflict of interest.
Mayor Reece invited public comment on the Consent Calendar.
There were no requests to speak.
Mayor Reece closed public comment on the Consent Calendar.
1. Adoption of Resolutions Approving the City Warrant Register Adopted Resolution No. 2023-45, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLAREMONT, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AND SPECIFYING THE FUNDS OUT OF WHICH THE SAME ARE TO BE PAID, dated July 6, 2023.
2. City Council Minutes of June 27, 2023 (Regular)
Approved and filed the regular City Council meeting minutes of June 27, 2023.
3. Cancellation of August 8 and August 22, 2023 Regular City Council Meetings Cancelled the regular City Council meetings of August 8 and August 22, 2023.
City Council Minutes
July 11, 2023
4. Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Submittal of a Used Oil Payment Program Application and Related Authorizations (Funding Source: Sanitation Fund) Adopted A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLAREMONT,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A USED OIL PAYMENT PROGRAM APPLICATION AND RELATED AUTHORIZATIONS.
5. Authorization to Enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage Inc. for Professional Economic Development and Brokerage Consulting Services (Funding Source: General Fund)
This item was removed from the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Leano moved to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-4; seconded by Councilmember Stark, and carried on a roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmember— Calaycay, Leano, Medina, Reece, Stark NOES: Councilmember— None
Item Removed from the Consent Calendar
5. Authorization to Enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage Inc. for Professional Economic Development and Brokerage Consulting Services (Funding Source: General Fund)
This item starts at 26:04 in the archived video.
Councilmember Medina recused himself due to this company being his spouse's employer.
Mayor Reece invited public comment.
There were no requests to speak.
Mayor Reece closed public comment and returned the discussion to the City Council.
Councilmember Stark moved to authorize the City Manager to enter into a one-year professional services agreement with Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage, Inc, for professional economic development and commercial real estate brokerage consulting services in the amount of$36,000, with two optional one-year extensions in the amount of$36,000 each; seconded by Councilmember Calaycay, and carried on a roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmember— Calaycay, Leano, Reece, Stark
NOES: Councilmember— None
ABSENT: Councilmember- Medina
ORDINANCES - None
PUBLIC HEARING
6. Adoption of General Plan Amendment (#23-GPA01), City of Claremont Housing Element Update — 6th Cycle (2021-2029), and Certification of Related Environmental Impact Report (Funding Source: General Fund)
This item starts at 28:45 in the archived video.
City Council Minutes
July 11, 2023
Mayor Reece announced that staff will be distributing numbered cards to audience members for those who wish to speak during the discussion of General Plan Amendment, Housing Element 6th Cycle and related EIR.
Mayor Reece stated that consideration of inclusion of the opportunity sites listed in the 2021- 2029 Housing Element Update will be addressed prior to the full discussion of the Housing Element update, and discussion may be segmented so that Councilmembers with actual or potential financial conflicts of interest may recuse themselves and not participate in making a decision on inclusion of those sites to which they have an interest. City Councilmembers announced those sites for which they have a conflict of interest (see chart below).
City Attorney Alisha Patterson provided information on the option to segment the discussion following Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) regulations, or the use of requalification procedures, the latter of which is not recommended.
It was the consensus of the City Council to use the segmented discussion process.
Mayor Reece announced that due to Councilmember Medina participating remotely, Councilmember Calaycay will Chair the meeting during the segment for which Mayor Reece will recuse himself.
Nikolas Hlady, Senior Planner, displayed a slide during consideration of each recusal depicting the opportunity sites in question.
At the time discussion of each segment on opportunity site inclusion was held, members of the City Council who were affected recused themselves. Public comment, motions and roll call votes were as follows:
Sonia, expressed concerns about problems that would be created by increased density including traffic impacts in relation to Opportunity Site 4.
Nikolas Hlady, Senior Planner, responded to the concerns expressed during public comment related to Opportunity Site 4.
Rachel Forester, on behalf of the League of Women Voters of the Mt. Baldy area, voiced support for Sites 35 and 37.
City Opportunity Site(s) Vote of Non-Recused Councilmembers Councilmember
Mayor Ed Reece 4, 23a, 23b, and 27 Motion by Councilmember Leano, Seconded by Councilmember Stark to
include Sites 4, 23a, 23b, and 27 in the
inventory:
AYES: Calaycay, Leano, Medina, Stark
NOES: None
ABSENT: Reece
Mayor Pro Tern 13, 14, and 17 Motion by Councilmember Leano, Sal Medina Seconded by Councilmember Stark to
include Sites 13, 14, and 17 in the
inventory:
AYES: Reece, Calaycay, Leano, Stark
City Council Minutes
July 11, 2023
City Opportunity Site(s) Vote of Non-Recused Councilmembers Councilmember
NOES: None
ABSENT: Medina
Councilmember 35 and 37 Motion by Councilmember Stark, Corey Calaycay Seconded by Councilmember Leano to include Sites 35 and 37 in the inventory:
AYES: Leano, Medina, Reece, Stark
NOES: None
ABSENT: Cala ca
Councilmember No conflicts.
Jed Leano
Councilmember No conflicts.
Jennifer Stark
Mayor Reece recessed the meeting at 7:26 p.m.
Mayor Reece reconvened the meeting at 7:37 p.m.
Mayor Reece announced that the City Council has voted to include all opportunity sites for consideration during the Housing Element discussion, and will now move to consideration of the Housing Element as a whole. But before doing that, he asked Senior Planner Hlady to provide the audience with methods to view a more detailed map.
Senior Planner Hlady and City Attorney Patterson gave a PowerPoint presentation describing the regulatory process, recent State laws, Claremont's RHNA needs, requirements and credits, existing litigation filed against the City for non-compliance and next steps and consequences, identification of the remaining needs, the opportunity sites inventory, and the goals and available programs, Planning Commission review, CEQA, Senior Planner Hlady, City Attorney Patterson, Veronica Tam, housing consultant, City Manager Pirrie, and Eileen Mahoney, environmental consultant, responded to questions from the City Council regarding potential challenges to certification, local preference, proximity to transit, parking ratios and State law, by-right development in very high fire severity zones, housing needs statistics, ADU production, prior opportunity site development, cost of process, estimated cost of General Plan update, fines versus investments, Statement of Overriding Considerations for the EIR, planning processes for workforce housing, funding alternatives, vacancy rates, COVID impacts on job loss statistics, methods for including workforce housing in RHNA calculations, AFFH fair housing requirements, related HCD comments received and programmatic actions, State non- compliance fine calculations, Claremont's RHNA assessment allocation, legislative contradictions, land availability, site selection factors, continuity of Housing Element review at the State level, density bonus law, potential effects and navigation of new laws related to 7th Cycle Housing Elements, new ADU laws loosening restrictions, implementation programs and procedures related to local zoning control, and timing of adoption of 5th Cycle Element.
Mayor Reece recessed the meeting at 9:43 p.m.
Mayor Reece reconvened the meeting at 9:50 p.m.
Mayor Reece opened the public hearing and invited public comment.
City Council Minutes
July 11, 2023
Unidentified Speaker, the City Council is limited in what they can do to control government as this is coming from Sacramento. Densification that occurs too fast eliminates the opportunity for proper analysis and oversight. Implored voters to be cognizant of who they vote for stop overreach by the State.
Unidentified Speaker, stated she moved to Claremont for the school system and a piece of agricultural land. The rules should not be rewritten. Lot 44 could have 22 units, and if people who move in don't like her animals, she will not stand a chance. Requested Sites 41, 42, 43, and 44 be taken off the list. She is also worried about evacuations if density is increased.
Unidentified Speaker, elections have consequences, particularly at the State level. Inquired what will high density housing do to surrounding property values; asked what the City is doing to fight these laws; stated the golf course is one of the biggest sites but only has a small triangle as a housing site; and asked how will those in high density housing in very high fire zones afford fire insurance.
Dr. Steven Mandell, Site 33 has an error in that three contiguous lots are stated, but there are actually four, as the northeast lot is part of the Lockhaven development. Sixteen units could fit without a zone change.
Richard Williams, Site 39 is not suitable for this density of residential development, does not comply with Government Code Section 65583's selection criteria, and inquired if analysis was performed related to impacts on infrastructure, including electrical capacity. He stated 30 units per acre is too high compared to surrounding neighborhoods. This site should be maintained as public to accommodate community or educational use.
Unidentified Speaker, asked to eliminate Sites 41, 42 and 43 as they are all within a half square mile block. With a density bonus, the result would be too many people moving into the neighborhood. Sites are not close to transportation or schools. If geographic diversity is the mandate, look at other sites.
Michelle Payne, the site proposed in north Claremont will change the integrity of the neighborhood. The sites are not close to a commercial corridor and there is no mass transit nearby. Insurance in this area is extremely high, the streets are very narrow, crime is going up, and there is no street parking or infrastructure for cars.
John Moranie, opposed including Sites 41, 42, 43, and 44, as they did not appear until the June draft, and neighbors were not provided good notice. Pomello and Padua are busy streets and three sites on one block is too much. There are no sidewalks or lighting. Density will increase crime. It is not accurate to state these sites are predominantly white and affluent. There is a drug rehabilitation facility on Belmont Abbey Lane.
Unidentified Speaker, inquired how to reconcile power outages and water needs for Site 33.
She concurred with the speaker who spoke about the golf course. She felt dissatisfied and drowned in acronyms and formulas.
Roger, lives near Sites 41-43 and understands the obligation to the State, but feels the City has a bigger obligation to the residents. He felt the Planning Commission vote was performative. There is a drug and alcohol rehab in the neighborhood, the crime rate is high, and this is a high fire hazard area. He asked to amend Sites 41-43 and suggested voters visit ReformCalifornia.org to support a ballot initiative to overturn some of these bills.
City Council Minutes
July 11, 2023
Ravi, lives next to Site 44 where there are no sidewalks and no streetlights or public transportation. Children could be hit by cars. Asked to remove Sites 41-44.
Ben, who is a local realtor, is worried about safety and liability for sites in high fire hazard areas. Homeowners are having trouble getting fire insurance in these areas, and inquired how evacuation will be possible on the narrow roads with no street lights.
Unidentified Speaker, stated her home borders the La Puerta site. Densities in north Claremont are fair given the amount of available land. People need to share their neighborhoods.
Jim Keith, in 2014, one of the identified sites was near Chaparral School. The City Council voted to deny, with staff warning the City would be out of compliance. It took another 4-5 years to get the Housing Element passed. No matter where you put units, people will be unhappy. None of the units in Sites 41-44 are low income; it is just higher density. Possibly cut units out of the high fire area, and agrees more use of the golf course should be required.
He urged passage before July 31 since the City is under Court order.
Mario, agrees with many of points made, and believes we should sue the State. Other cities are suing for the State for overreaching. He understands there is a housing problem, but the Housing Element is inappropriate.
Bryan Trunik, one of the few people here from south Claremont, and believes that south Claremont is constantly dumped on. The people from south Claremont give up. This is not fair or equitable. North Claremont feels like Trumark's proposal is a travesty, but way-more is proposed for south Claremont near him.
Kevin Bovey, staff should diligently study whether owners of the north Claremont sites want to develop. He inquired if an owner has submitted plans, would they be viable. He and his neighbors have contacted the owners of the 18 sites, and only 8 are viable. Most of the sites in 41-43 will accommodate above market and should not be approved today. Alternate sites he has identified could accommodate more units and should be approved for moderate income.
Rachel Forrester, League of Women Voters of the Mt. Baldy Area, supports the Housing Element as is. Different areas have different amenities. South Claremont has access to transit. North Claremont has access to parks. The proposal will allow people to find housing that meets their needs.
Valerie Gustaveson, regarding Site 1 on Mills Avenue, believes there is legislation that prevents building new housing near freeways due to air quality. That site is not close to schools or grocery stores. The only entrance is on Mills, and traffic goes in and out of storage and the nearby church all day, and the church is busy evenings and weekends. Inquired if tacky motels could be replaced with housing, and asked why lots at the northeast corner of Arrow and Indian Hill, and San Jose east of Indian Hill have been vacant for so long.
Lee Kane, Program Director for the San Gabriel Valley Consortium on Homelessness, supports the Housing Element as is. Delay would be irresponsible, and everyone in the City needs to do their share to meet RHNA needs. More sites north of Baseline are needed, not less. There have been multiple public meetings on the Housing Element, and we are in a housing crisis.
City Council Minutes
July 11, 2023
Sonia Otte, understands the crisis and need for affordable housing but her concern is that Sites 41-44 were thrown in at the last minute. Roads are not built for more cars, there are no streetlights or parking, and crime is rising. She believes there is a need for a more thoughtful process regarding infrastructure, before increasing the number of people. She added she cannot use her cell phone in her house to call police or fire.
Rahmim, agrees with Ms. Otte.Affordable housing is important but access to phones, roads, or fire were not addressed by the Planning Commission related to Sites 41-44. He added streetlights are important for visibility if there are more people in the area walking.
Darvin Gomez, is directly impacted by the Motel 6 tennis courts. He stated the developer wants to build 65 three-story townhomes, with a density of 22 units per acre, which will destroy his backyard privacy, as well as having his windows face the development. He is concerned that increased setbacks are tentative. He feels zoning should be RS 4000, not RS 2000. He stated south Claremont is getting 700 units with VSSP, and if it weren't for HCD, there would barely be any sites in north Claremont.
Braulio implored the City Council to listen to their constituents and please find a way to protect them.
Sonia stated Site 4 is in her backyard, and is concerned about 31 units. She understands the need to comply with State law, but that site is too dense, causing concern about privacy and property values.
Lydia Hernandez, speaking on behalf of Claremont Tenants United, agrees with the League of Women Voters and SGV Consortium on Homelessness speakers. Seeks anti- harassment protections for renters and a registry. Urges adoption as is.
Allison Henry, agrees with Rachel Forrester, Lee Kane, and Lydia Hernandez. The threat of a lawsuit was a cooling agent in tenant protection ordinances, and urged use of the same lens for this. Suggested the City strive to support the AFFH, have best practices and support low income residents.
Gene Boutilier, stated the wisest course of action is to pass the Housing Element as is tonight. There will be time to amend this as needed. Pressure from State government is rooted in strong support for fair and affordable housing.
Terry Chase stated opposition to Sites 41-44. His issues are mainly public safety, noting that since the Wilderness Park parking was expanded, break-ins have increased. Asked that the City Council not be bullied into decisions that residents do not want. If Sites 41-44 are removed, the State may reject the plan, accept the plan, or reject the plan for other reasons. All scenarios buy more time to do better to protect quality of life.
There were no further requests to speak.
Mayor Reece closed the public hearing.
Mayor Reece recessed the meeting at 11:19 p.m.
Mayor Reece reconvened the meeting at 11:25 p.m.
This portion of Item 6 begins at 4:57 in the archived video.
City Council Minutes
July 11, 2023
Senior Planner Hlady, City Attorney Patterson, Community Development Director Johnson, and City Councilmembers responded to questions raised during the public comment related to what the City will do to oppose State law and restore local control, infrastructure and public improvement requirements during the development process, new development in neighborhoods with rural development standards, public safety related to higher density, water and electrical needs with increased density, permanent supportive housing and below market rate housing, labelling of lots at Lockhaven site, identification of other underutilized sites north of Baseline Road for consideration to adjust density in the area, notification and engagement during the process, proposed setback, zoning and elevations from potential developer of Site 40, viability of alternative options and rezoning, process for substituting sites including Planning Commission review, north Claremont site selection process, net change with proposed rezoning overlay, development adjacent to freeways due to health concerns, number of remaining meetings, number of units and elevation at Site 33, noticing, annual reporting of new housing units, capacity, site selection criteria, the net difference in a zone change from RM4000 to RM2000 for Site 40, impact on La Puerta site.
Councilmember Stark stated we do not have enough housing for our town, and this is a moral imperative to create upward mobility opportunities for our community.
Councilmember Leano inquired what factual basis could be applied to change the density on a property that has already been entitled for a single-family home.
Councilmember Calaycay raised concerns about codifying zoning changes on properties currently going through a process, and would consider removing those sites, although it would complicate the process.
Mayor Reece inquired if sites were removed, could an amendment be considered in the future.
City Attorney Patterson explained that a different proposal would require a super majority or 4/5th vote, and would be without HCD review. The revision would go back to the Planning Commission and the City Council and submitted for recertification.
Councilmember Stark expressed concern about making decisions that would place the City in jeopardy of not meeting our compliance date, and having a Housing Element that is not certified.
City Attorney Patterson explained the courts could find us in contempt and the State could levy penalties against us.
City Manager Pirrie explained the City is currently not eligible for the PLHA funding through the Regional Housing Trust due to our non-compliance.
Councilmember Medina asked if HCD and AFFH would look at the City more favorably if we move numbers from an area that is highly impacted to a higher resource area.
City Attorney Patterson stated that it may be looked at unfavorably if a developer walked away from a potential project, we would lose a housing opportunity.
Veronica Tam stated that it is a risk to submit a Housing Element that is different than what has been reviewed. She stated that one of the overall themes is new opportunities in high
City Council Minutes
July 11, 2023
resource areas, and suggested adopting the Element tonight, and review sites through the rezoning process.
Councilmember Medina would like to see us go to bat for south Claremont residents. Village South is bringing in 900 homes. So if we can say we are working hard to reallocate the 32 units, it will go a long way to reaffirm that we are invested in serving all Claremont.
Councilmember Leano stated he feels a challenge will be if someone else comes forward with future requests to shuffle sites.
City Attorney Patterson stated adoption tonight allows the City to submit a Housing Element for certification, and once submitted, a rezone is not required for someone to come in for a project on a particular site.
Councilmember Calaycay stated he usually feels like a pragmatist, but it is very hard to do so with the complicated choices the City is presented with, and the State passing more and more legislation. There is no way to win on this. Detailed how every problem we have right now is due to the State of California. He stated he rejects this process as ideology gets the better of us.
Councilmember Stark stated democracy is not perfect, but one of the benefits we have is to do our best not to make decisions political. We are millions of units behind, and it will take decades to catch up. We are called to analysis these different spots objectively throughout the City. Stated she is in favor of approving the Housing Element and continuing the work during the zoning process.
Councilmember Medina inquired if limitations could be imposed on site modification.
City Attorney Patterson stated the City Council can provide direction, but there is nothing to be done to stop additional requests.
Mayor Reece moved to adopt the Housing Element as proposed except remove Sites 41, 42, 43 and 44, modify the proposed new zoning on Site 40 from RM 2000 to RM 4000; and direct staff to bring back future potential amendments that add new opportunity site in north Claremont for the City Council's consideration.
The motion failed for lack of a second.
Councilmember Medina asked if we could reduce the density in the north rather than eliminate them.
Senior Planner Hlady stated reducing the density on the sites in the north with no rezoning, but assigning 3 units per site by right, or 3 or 4 units through SIB 9 would be a way to reduce density on those sites. However, to promote AFFH, be cautious in reducing the number of units in those census tracts.
Councilmember Stark moved to approve the staff recommendation, and provide direction to staff to engage the community during the zoning process to look for other sites up north, but only bring back those changes if HCD provides direction that they will conditionally approve them; seconded by Councilmember Leano and failed on the following roll call vote:
City Council Minutes
July 11, 2023
AYES: Councilmember— Leano, Stark
NOES: Councilmember— Calaycay, Medina, Reece
Councilmember Medina moved to modify the Housing Element Update if it were amended to reduce the density of Site 40 from RM 2000 to RM 4000, and provide direction to staff to work with HCD to explore whether they would conditionally certify the Housing Element Update with that change and to remove Sites 41, 42, 43 and 44, and replace them with alternate sites in north Claremont.
City Attorney Patterson confirmed this change would require a super-majority vote of the City Council.
Councilmember Stark stated that if the goal is to be certified, seems as though we should work with HCD through the process.
Councilmember Medina was concerned about the developer applying under the current zoning.
Councilmember Leano stated changing the zoning of a pipeline project may potentially be viewed as a constraint to housing by HCD. The City is subject to Builder's Remedy at this point, and speculate that certification of our Housing Element may be jeopardized.
Councilmember Medina asked staff for clarification.
City Manager Pirrie stated the City is exposed to risk of not receiving certification if it is submitted in that manner, and it would be difficult for staff to quantify that risk.
Veronica Tam stated that adjustments at this late stage, after six reviews, does not allow her to provide any assurances on how that would be viewed.
Councilmember Medina withdrew the motion.
Councilmember Leano moved to adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CLAREMONT, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2021090340) AND ADOPTING THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE(#23-GPA01), with the direction that, during the zoning changes process, staff work with the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to look for other sites in north Claremont as alternatives to Sites 41 through 44, or to redistribute density in north Claremont while including those sites at a lower density, which changes shall not cause a reduction to the total number of sites within the census tract, and reduce the density of Site 40 from RM 2000 to RM 4000, only bringing back these alternatives for future discussion if HCD conditionally approves those alternatives;seconded by Councilmember Stark, and carried on a roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmember— Leano, Medina, Stark
NOES: Councilmember— Calaycay, Reece
ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS - None
City Council Minutes
July 11, 2023
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Reece adjourned the meeting of the Claremont City Council Wednesday, July 12, 2023, at 1:55 a.m. The next regular meeting of the Claremont City Council will be held on Tuesday, July 25, 2023, at 6:30 p.m., in the Claremont Council Chamber.
Mayor
ATTEST:
4 4.e�" 4�7 ���
Clerk