Clayton City Council
March 15, 2022

Construction and Project Management .Inspection .Staff Augmentation 3685 Mt. Diablo Blvd, Suite 345 Lafayette, CA 94549 .P (925) 385-0950 .F (925) 385-0424 . www.anchorcm.com On a personal level, I grew up in nearby Concord and I know the area well. I am currently a Concord resident that can respond quickly and efficiently to the City’s needs. Our office is located within Contra Costa County and many staff reside nearby as well. All of our subconsultant firms have an office in the East Bay and already service many clients in Contra Costa County.

We are committed to providing high quality services on an affordable budget to the City and itsresidents. With CSG as our main partner, our team will be able to provide you with the day‐to‐day attention of a smaller firm while  offer  access  to  resources  of  a  larger  firm  when  needed. Please contact me at (925) 890‐9732 or [email protected] if you have any questions. We look forward to discussing our qualifications with you and establishing a collaborative working relationship with the City.

Sincerely,
Larry Theis, P.E.

President

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 3 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Section 2a: Firm Information
AnchorCM
AnchorCM was founded in 2003 as Anchor Engineering, Inc. AnchorCM is an S‐Corporation owned and managed by Bisa Grant. We are a minority woman‐owned business. AnchorCM is a Small Business Enterprise (SBE), and a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) (CUCP #50749). Our Department of Industrial Relations Contractor Registration Number is 1000015352.

We are driven by the desire to provide exemplary service to our clients, while providing a professional work environment for ourstaff. By attracting the best and brightest to our firm, your municipal engineering needs getthe attention they require.Ourspecialties are construction project management, and staff augmentation servicesfor public infrastructure projects and programsthroughout California. AnchorCM has approximately 25 employees that will help meet your needs.

AnchorCM’s municipal engineering servicesisled by our President, Larry Theis. Larry has more than 20 years of municipal engineering experience and is a California registered professional civil engineer (C67662). Larry will be supported by Jason Chen, Anchor’s Engineering Manager (former City Engineer of Orinda), who is also a California registered professional civil engineer (C68846).

CSG
CSG is a California company with their headquarters in Foster City. Additional support is available from regional officesin Pleasanton, Sacramento, San Jose, Fresno, Orange, and Newman. The majority of the over 300 individuals within the firm have provided public agency servicesthroughout their careers. Their talented personnel bring a wealth of ideas and experiences having provided services to communities facing similar challenges and opportunities as the City of Clayton. CSG staff consists of civil engineers, traffic engineers, surveyors, program and project managers, construction managers, inspectors, and specialized planning professionals.

Advanced Mobility Group (AMG)
Advanced Mobility Group (AMG) is a California Corporation and certified Small Business Enterprise (SBE), established in 2018 to provide specialized innovative transportation services to clients. Their team assists with disruptive technologiesto empower the private and public sector in early adoption of proven advanced transportation solutions and intelligent infrastructure.

AMG isstaffed by a 30‐member team with officeslocated in Walnut Creek, Oakland, and San Francisco. Their engineering professionals serve public sector clients throughout California and have performed key work on projects across the nation. Work on this contract will be performed from the Walnut Creek Office in Contra Costa County.

Their team of transportation professionals offer a wide range of services that address clients’ needs throughout the duration of a project’s life cycle from planning to operations and maintenance – including permitting assistance, programming, public engagement, conceptual and final design, schedule analysis, technical services, procurement services, project delivery, construction support, dispute/claims resolution, systems integration, revenue generation, and ongoing infrastructure management.

AMG is familiar with Caltrans specifications, standard plans, and procedures tied to the design and construction of traffic systems and development of traffic handling plans. As a vested partner in the community, AMG connects to projects on a personal level to advance the quality of life in communities City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 4 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
across the region.

BSK Associates (BSK)
BSK is a 100 percent employee‐owned California S Corporation that provides consulting engineering, construction observation, materials testing, special inspection, and analytical chemistry laboratory services.

Founded in 1966 in Fresno, nearly 75% of BSK’s Bay Area office’s projects are in support of on‐call contracts for the public sector. Their Bay Area office currently staffs 30 employees, including 2 registered geotechnical engineers, a registered civil engineer, 2 registered geologists, 5 engineers‐in‐training, 2 geologists‐in‐ training, and 22 multi‐certified special inspectors and materials testers.

The BSK Bay Area team has a strong resume supporting on‐call contracts which include Alameda County, Contra Costa County and Stanislaus County, and the Cities of Alameda, Belmont, Berkeley, Brentwood, Dublin, Fremont, Livermore, Pinole, Pleasanton, San Ramon, Tracy, Vallejo, and Walnut Creek as examples.

Although the CIP projects that they support are by far small in scope, BSK is also a State of California Department of General Services‐certified Small Business for Public Works Projects (SB‐PW), certification #2014327SB‐PW. BSK is a registered public works contractor with the Department of Industrial Relations, DIR Registration Number 1000003557.

Francisco & Associates (F&A)
F&A has been in business since 2000. F&A is a S‐Corporation. The firm has two locations, in San Ramon and Carlsbad. The firm isled by itsfounder and principal, Joseph A. Francisco, P.E. (C40688) and Eduard Espinoza, P.E. (C83709). F&A has seven employees and additional stuff during peak season. Principal members of the firm have over 60 years of public finance and municipal engineering experience. Members of the project team have worked for public agencies and been responsible for the formation and administration of special assessment districts and other financing districts.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 5 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Section 2b: Names and Roles of Personnel
The scope of work within this RFP is broken down into four key categories of services:

1. City Engineering:

Larry Theis (AnchorCM) will perform the work of Clayton’s City Engineer. Larry will also provide oversight of the work performed by subconsultants under this category as well as the other three categories. While AnchorCM is able to provide the day‐to‐day engineering needs of the City, if necessary, the following subconsultants may be utilized for their technical expertise:
 Civil Engineering: CSG: The CSG civil engineering team will be led by Mario Camorongan, P.E., and assisted by Laurence Lau, P.E., PLS, QSD/P.
 Traffic/transportation: Advanced Mobility Group (AMG): The AMG team will be led by Joy Bhattacharya, P.E., PTOE, Vice President.
 Geotechnical: BSK’s engineering team will be led by Cristiano Melo, P.E., G.E., Principal Engineer and will be assisted by Carrie Foulk, P.E., G.E., Senior Geotechnical Engineer/Geotechnical Group Manager.
 Other subconsultants: AnchorCM has access to several other technical subconsultants should other needs arise.

2. General Engineering Services (Non‐General Fund Capital Projects):

AnchorCM will provide general oversight of the work under this category. The work can be performed by AnchorCM or our team of technical subconsultants. They are as follow:
 Civil Engineering: The CSG civil engineering team will be led by Mario Camorongan, P.E., and assisted by Laurence Lau, P.E., PLS, QSD/P.
 Traffic/Transportation: Advanced Mobility Group (AMG): The AMG team will be led by Joy Bhattacharya, P.E., PTOE.
 Geotechnical: The BSK geotechnical team will be led by Cristiano Melo, P.E., G.E., Principal Engineer and will be assisted by Carrie Foulk, P.E., G.E., Senior Geotechnical Engineer/Geotechnical Group Manager.
 Material Testing: The BSK material testing team will be led by Cristiano Melo, P.E., G.E., Principal Engineer and will be assisted Michael Kibbey, Material Testing Task Manager.  Other subconsultants: AnchorCM has access to several other technical subconsultants should other needs arise.

When required by grants such as federal grants, it may be necessary for the City to issue project‐specific Request for Qualifications (RFQ) or Request for Proposals (RFP). In those instances, AnchorCM will act on behalf of the City through the solicitation process to select the technical consultants. To avoid a conflict of interest, AnchorCM will not propose on those solicitations.

3. Land Development Review and Permitting Services:

AnchorCM will provide general oversight of all work under this category. CSG will lead the land development review and permitting services. BSG’s geotechnical team will support CSG with geotechnical review needs. The CSG land development review team will be led by Mario Camorongan, P.E. The BSK geotechnical team will be led by Cristiano Melo, P.E., G.E., Principal Engineer and will be assisted by Carrie Foulk, P.E., G.E., Senior Geotechnical Engineer/Geotechnical Group Manager.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 6 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003

4. Annual Administration/Assessments Levy Services:

AnchorCM will provide oversight of all work under this category. For the GHAD, Larry Theis will also serve as the GHAD Manager.

F&A will be the main subconsultant that will perform the annual administration/assessment levy services.

Principal members of the firm, Eduardo Espinoza, P.E., Brian Brown, and Joseph Francisco, P.E., combined have over 60 years of public finance and municipal engineering experience. Members of the project team have worked for public agencies and been responsible for the formation and administration of special assessment districts and other financing districts.

Francisco & Associates believes having a senior level professional as the main point of contact for the City and property owners eliminates confusion and frustration for their clients. Most of their competitors have multiple points of contact for their clients. For example, one employee may prepare the annual levy, another may prepare the annexations, another may oversee the formations, and another may assist with property owner phone calls. This process does not allow one employee or multiple members of your project team to know all the details associated with the annual administration of the City’s assessment districts thereby not allowing the firm to respond quickly and accurately to questions from City staff, developers, property owners, etc.

For this reason, your project team will consist of the individuals below:

Your Principal‐In‐Charge and Assessment Engineer will be Eduardo Espinoza, P.E., who has worked with public agencies for over 14 years. Eduardo Espinoza will be the City’s assessment engineer and will oversee all aspects of the City’s project. He will be assisted by Brian Brown, Project Manager, who has over 15 years of public finance experience andwill be the City’s and property owner’s day to day contact. Joseph Francisco, P.E., Quality Control Engineer, who has over 35 years of municipal engineering and public finance experience will be responsible for reviewing work product and ensuring that all internal quality control measures are implemented and adhered to. Anthony Hernandez, Project/GIS Analyst will support the Assessment Engineer and Project Manager as needed throughout the annual administration process.

If necessary, AnchorCM will also utilize BSK for geotechnical work. The BSK geotechnical team will be led by Cristiano Melo, P.E., G.E., Principal Engineer and will be assisted by Carrie Foulk, P.E., G.E., Senior Geotechnical Engineer/Geotechnical Group Manager.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 7 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Organization Chart
This organization chart below represents our proposed project team for the City of Clayton’s engineering needs. We have the necessary resources to handle all engineering requests from the City.

City of Clayton
Reina Schwartz
City Manager
AnchorCM
Larry Theis
City Engineer
AMG
Joy Bhattacharya
Traffic
CSG
Lawrence Lau, P.E.

Civil Engineering
CSG
Suzanne Avila
Environmental
Support
CSG
Mario Camorongan,
P.E. Land Development
CSG
David Rubcic, P.E.

City Surveyor
F&A
Eduardo Espinoza, P.E.

Assessment District
AnchorCM
Jason Chen
Deputy City Engineer
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 8 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Section 2c: Resumes of Personnel
Below is Larry Theis’s resume. Resumes for other key personnel are included in the appendix.

Larry Theis, P.E.

Project Principal, City Municipal Engineer
Experience Summary
Larry has over 21 years of experience in Municipal Engineering for public agencies. He has worked at the State, County, and Local/City levels of government, specifically in engineering and public works. He brings these skills to AnchorCM to consult and provide services to Northern California public agency clients.

Experience
21 years
Education/Training
State of California
Professional Engineer
License #67662
B.S. Civil and
Environmental
Engineering, Emphasis
in Transportation &
Project Management,
UC Berkeley
CA Notary Public
#2282509
Affiliations
American Public Works
Association
American Society of Civil
Engineers
Skills
Public Speaking/
Council Presentations
Outreach and
Consensus Builder
Relevant Project Experience:

City of Orinda,
City Engineer then Director of Public Works and Engineering Services (2013‐2021)
Responsible for capital improvement projects, engineering, development review, lighting and landscape district, maintenance and operations.

Highlights include a completion of a $55 million roadway program, $3 million emergency rainstorm repairs, presentations and preparation of staff reports and resolution for City Council, public outreach for projects and new programs, worked closely with City Attorneys on flooding and landslide case, and procured regional and federal grants for projects.

City of Orinda
Orinda Pavement Rehabilitation Program, Department Head Oversight $60 million, 2014‐2019
Full depth reclamation, mill and overlay, slurry seal with digouts, microsurfacing, culvert replacement ‐ multiyear renewal of road pavement condition from PCI 46 to 85.

City of Orinda
Camino Pablo Pavement Rehabilitation, Project Manager
$2.5 million, 2015
Mill & overlay and signal upgrades on major arterial road.

Contra Costa County Public Works
Kirker Pass Overlay, Project Manager/Resident Engineer, Lead Designer $1.7 million, 2012
Cold in Place Recycling ‐ using emulsion‐based technique for approximately 2 miles.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 9 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Larry Theis, P.E.

Project Principal,
City Municipal
Engineer
City of Orinda
Wilder Subdivision Development, Design Oversight
Project Value, 2013‐current
Installation of road, storm drain, parks, basins, staging area, trails.

Contra Costa County Public Works
Buchanan Airport Runway/Pavement Rehab, Project Manager $3 million, 2011‐ 2012
Cold in Place Recycling of center section of runway ‐ using emulsion‐ based technique.

Contra Costa County Public Works
Vasco Road Overlay, Lead Designer
$2.5 million, 2008‐2009
Accelerated shovel ready project to mill and inlay HMA along Vasco Road for approximately 3 miles.

Contra Costa County Public Works
Lower Walnut Creek Channel Desilt and Levee Raising, Lead Designer/ Project Manager
$5 million, 2007
Removal sediment from channel bottom to improve flood control capacity in North Concord to address ACOE new requirements.

Contra Costa County Public Works
Walnut Creek & Grayson Creek Channel Desilting, Resident Engineer & Inspector
$3 million, 2006
Removal sediment from channel bottom to improve flood control capacity in Concord and Pleasant Hill area.

Contra Costa County Public Works
San Ramon Creek Bank Restoration, Lead Designer/Project Manager & Resident Engineer/Inspector
$1.2 million, 2005‐2006
Designed embankment project with willow cuttings/brush layering.

Contra Costa County Public Works
Dougherty Valley Development, Design/Project Oversight for Civil and Landscape Improvements
$150 million, 2002‐2005
5,500‐unit master planned subdivision community with single & multi‐ family units, parks, creeks, community college campus.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 10 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Section 2d: Scope of Services and Planned Approach
Staff augmentation is a core service provided by AnchorCM. We are proposing Larry Theis, AnchorCM President, as Clayton’s City Engineer. Larry will lead the AnchorCM team and be the City’s single point of contact to provide the scope of services as described in this RFP. Larry has over 20 years of experience working for public agencies. Up until a few months ago, Larry was the City of Orinda (Orinda) Director of Public Works and Engineering Services as well as their Assistant City Manager. In many ways, Larry still approaches issues more like a public agency staff than a consultant. This is a major differentiator between AnchorCM and our competitors. Larry understands other considerations and duties that are often asked of public agency staff with his municipal engineering background.

The City of Clayton and Orinda are quite similar in many aspects. Both agencies are relatively small with similar challenges but still strive to provide excellent services to their residents. There are similarities in how the City separated the engineering work compared to the system that Larry established at Orinda.

The only difference isthat the City engineering function was performed by Orinda’sin‐house staff whereas the City of Clayton is seeking a consultant to perform this work. For both agencies, the other scopes of work were performed by consultants. Larry was successful in Orinda and can bring his expertise to assist the City of Clayton. By selecting our team, Clayton will receive the benefit of hiring city engineer/public works director within the same region/county that is quite in tune with the current needs and processes to fully manage your department.

1. City Engineering:

AnchorCM is proposing Larry to serve as Clayton’s City Engineer. Larry is familiar with this role as he was the Orinda’s City Engineer and the Director of Public Works and Engineering Services.

City Council meetings: As Clayton’s City Engineer, Larry understands the importance of attending City Council meetings. Larry has extensive experience in this arena as he performed this function for the past 8 years at Orinda. Larry has prepared and reviewed staff reports and made presentations at past Orinda city council meetings. Larry hasresponded to councilmembers as well as public inquiries during the council meetings. As for closed sessions of the Council meetings, they often involved difficult issues with legal complications. Larry has been able to breakdown these complex issuesfor the councilmembersto aid their discussions. As a demonstration of Larry’s competence in this arena, the Orinda City Manager had tasked Larry to be the Acting City Manager whenever he is not available for both the open and closed sessions of the city council meetings.

Internal staff meetings: Larry understands the importance of coordinating with other City staff and departments and the internalstaff meetings are helpful to improve coordination between the Engineering Department with other City departments/functions. In Orinda, Larry was an active participant in these weekly internal staff meetings. Larry understands participation of Clayton’s internal meetings is highly desired and plans to attend them and engage with in‐house staff members.

Capital Improvement Program (CIP): Larry has prepared and reviewed several editions of Orinda’s Capital Improvement Program documents. This includes holding CIP workshops with councilmembers to obtain initial feedback; preparing the draft CIPs, presenting recommendations, prioritization, presenting draft CIPs at council meetings; responding to councilmembers and public inquiries; and finalizing the annual CIP documents. There are typically more “wants” than available funding. As part of the CIP process, Larry had led discussions with city managers, councilmembers, as well as the public on prioritization of the limited funds. Based on those discussions, Larry has prepared prioritization recommendations for the city City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 11 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
managers and councilmembersto consider and discuss. Larry is knowledgeable of grant opportunitiesthat may bring in additional resources to the City. He has secured several grants during the last round of One Bay Area Grant (OBAG2) and completed them successfully. In addition, Larry led Orinda’s discussion and prioritization of over $55 million of roadway repair bonds/add on sales tax funds. During Larry tenure at Orinda, he and his staff raised the Orinda Pavement Condition Index (PCI) from 46 (Fair Condition) to 85 (Very Good). The roadway program/projects received multiple League of California Cities awards. Larry was also invited to be a presenter at the 2017 League of the California Cities Public Works Officer Institute Conference to discuss Orinda’s roadway program. At Orinda, Larry led his team to complete multiple CIP projects that received American Public Works Association (APWA) and League of California Cities awards.

Larry understands a big part of the CIP process is also to coordinate closely with Finance and is looking forward to the collaboration with the City.

Budget: In addition to the CIP, Larry understands that as the Clayton City Engineer, he would participate in the annual budget discussions that usually occur before beginning of each fiscal year. Similar to the CIP preparations, Larry has extensive experience in creating budgets and worked closely with the city manager and finance director as the Orinda Director of Public Works and Engineering Services. Larry will be able to bring his knowledge and experience to the City. Larry understands his participation in discussions with Clayton City Council, City Manager, and Finance Director will be required.

Availability to the public and private developers: Larry will be available to the public and private developers dealing with the engineering functions of the City government. Since the needs are unpredictable and would be too costly to dedicate a full‐time person at City Hall, AnchorCM proposes that public and private developers contact Larry directly to set up appointments and virtual meetings. Because of the remotework requirement of the pandemic, more people are familiar with virtual meetings. This will reduce the need for Larry to travel to City Hall. In addition, this will allow more flexibility for availability compared to holding a dedicated office time, which might be inconvenient forsome. However, if needed, Larry residesin nearby Concord, and can respond onsite quickly. AnchorCM’s office is located within Contra Costa County (in Lafayette) with a majority of our staff working and residing nearby who can respond immediately if necessary.

Coordination with other agencies and representing the City: Larry spent much of his professional career in Contra Costa County. Larry has  established professional relationships with staff  at many Contra Costa County  public  agencies. It is typical and necessary to coordinate with nearby agencies. In addition to coordinating, Larry has led joint projects that received APWA and League of California Cities awards.

Assistance in solicitation for CIP design work: For smaller agencies such as the City, it is not cost effective to have in‐house designers. Larry is knowledgeable in soliciting designers and done so for many of his projects and will be able to assist the City through the process.

Assistance  in procurement of  contractors for public works  construction:  Larry is knowledgeable in the procurement of contractors for public work construction. The technical design consultantstypically do not complete the front‐end administration specifications. Larry will be able to merge the City’s requirements with the technical requirements to solicit construction bids. During his time at Contra Costa County Public Works, Larry was the “go‐to” person for construction contractor procurements.

Address failed infrastructure for immediate safety concerns: Orinda is one of the oldest communities in the County and has aging infrastructure. During his tenure at Orinda, Larry was often challenged to address the failed infrastructure, especially during rainstorm events. Perhaps the most challenging time was during the City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 12 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
2017 rainstorm events. Orinda suffered storm damage reaching into the multi‐million‐dollar range. The largest damage was a major sinkhole underneath a collector road for most of northeast Orinda that created a long detour. By working closely with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Caltrans, and resource agencies, Larry was able to perform emergency restoration of this roadway within 4 months, from selecting the restoration method, to design, to construction completion. Among all the roadway failures that resulted in road closure within Contra Costa County during 2017, this was the fastest restoration effort. The quick restoration minimized the disruption to residents. The project won the Orinda Mayor’s Award as well as an APWA project of the year award. By working with FHWA, Caltrans, FEMA, and Cal OES, Larry recovered $3 million of disaster relief aids for Orinda as result of 2017 storm damages. Larry has been instrumental in improving Orinda’s infrastructure, as captured in the September 15, 2021 edition of Lamorinda Weekly:

Council Member Darlene Gee added, "I can't even really imagine that you're not going to be with us!" She said that the greatest gift was his help with Orinda's roads and infrastructure, attributing his "magnificent work" to bringing Orinda's infrastructure up to a much, much better condition than it was in when he started.

Familiarity with regional, state, and federal transportation funding entities: Larry is familiar with regional, state, and federal transportation funding entities. Larry has experience in applying for grants with these entities. Larry has been successful in obtaining multiple grants for Orinda, including during the last round of One Bay Area Grant cycle (OBAG 2). Larry completed multiple CIP projects that require coordination with Caltrans Local Assistance Office, Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA), and resource agencies. During Larry’s tenure at Orinda, APWA Norcal Chapter awarded Orinda multiple awards. For transportation planning and grant opportunities, Larry understands the importance of participating in CCTA’s Regional Transportation Planning Committee (RTPC).

Larry will represent the City at Transportation Partnership and Cooperation (TRANSPAC), the RTPC that the City belongs to.

Familiarity to San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board Municipal Regional Permit (MRP) and Contra Costa Clean Water Program: Anchor is familiar with MRP 2.0 and understands the City, along with other agencies, are in the process of working with the Water Board on MRP 3.0. Larry is familiar with the challenges of the new proposed requirements, such as the onerous requirement to implement green infrastructure on pavement projects. AnchorCM understands that the Laura Hoffmeister, the Assistant to the City Manager, has been representing the City at the Contra Costa Clean Water Program for many years and has extensive MRP knowledge. Some MRP requirements will need to be implemented as part of the engineering work. We look forward to coordinating closely with Ms. Hoffmeister.

AnchorCM recognizes cost is very important for a smaller agency such as the City. While Larry will be the City’s single point of contact, the engineering work may be performed by other AnchorCM staff with lower billing rates in an attempt to minimize costs. Larry will assign and oversee all work. We propose that Jason Chen be one of the main Anchor staff to support Larry with the City’s engineering needs. Jason, Anchor’s Engineering Manager, is a registered California professional civil engineer. Larry and Jason have successfully worked together at Orinda for 5 years. After Larry was promoted to the Orinda Assistant City Manager position, Jason was promoted to the City Engineer position. Whenever Larry was not available, Jason had stepped in as Larry’s backup to perform the same functions as the Acting Director of Public Works and Engineering. We believe this arrangement will work well at the City. If more specialized needs arise, AnchorCM will reach out to technical subconsultants that can assist if necessary. They will act as the City’s on‐call technicalsubconsultants. Please see the following sectionsregarding these technicalsubconsultants.

AnchorCM also has access to several other subconsultant partners through our successful working City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 13 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
relationships developed over the years.

2. General Engineering Services (non‐General Fund Capital Projects) We have found that with Larry providing overall management of City projects and utilizing technical subconsultants to provide detail design, we can provide a format for successful project delivery. Larry has extensive experience and is very comfortable with this format. This is the same set‐up that Larry operated in at Orinda. AnchorCM is familiar with many technicalsubconsultants that perform work for Contra Costa County agencies and could provide the City access to these partner subconsultants as needed.

For smaller projects or not required by funding requirements, AnchorCM can perform the preliminary engineering work. When technical experts are needed, AnchorCM has access to technical subconsultants, included but not limit to the consultants identified under the City Engineering category scope of work.

For larger projects, Anchor would recommend the City to perform project‐specific solicitations. This will allow the City to select the most qualified technical subconsultant for that project. Sometimes, grant requirements, such as federal grants will require the City to perform project‐specific solicitations as well.

AnchorCM will assistthe City through the solicitation process. To avoid any conflicts of interests, AnchorCM will not submit any proposals when we assist the City with the solicitation process.

AMG: Traffic Engineering
AMG will be the technical subconsultant that will assist the City with traffic engineering needs.

Experience with Concord On‐Call and Local Community Goals ‐ Key AMG staff are currently providing on‐ call planning and engineering services to the City of Concord and various other local jurisdictions in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Solano Counties. Their extensive experience in the Bay Area includes more than 30 years on numerous traffic engineering projects, making them a well‐suited partner, committed to continuing this service to your community. Their team has been working alongside City of Concord staff for more than five years, so they understand the surrounding community goals and objectives for the Clayton on‐call assignment and the work that needs to be performed.

AMG’s focus is on providing innovative solutions respecting local preferences and understanding the myriad of environmental regulations and design guidelines that affect today’s transportation projects.

They manage the project development process proactively, recognizing that successful transportation projects require more than just good technicalsolutions—they must be sustainable economically, socially, and environmentally. They work with clients and stakeholders to achieve that, while supporting cost‐ effective solutions. The services AMG can provide are as follows:
 Preparing Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) for CIP Projects  Safety Analysis, Traffic Calming and Complete Streets Design  Traffic Operations: Analysis, Simulation, Modeling and Impacts  Signal Design and Timing
 Conduct Engineering Speed Surveys per MUTCD
 Parking Studies, Design, Operations and Management
 Pavement and Drainage Design
 Intelligent Transportation Systems
 Traffic Management Centers
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 14 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
 Adaptive Traffic Control Systems
 Automated Traffic Signal Performance Measures
 Grant Funding, Programming, Budgeting
 Traffic Impact Studies/Peer Review
 Travel Demand Forecasting and Modeling
 Transportation Demand Management
 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Analysis
 Transit Planning and Design
 Review traffic handling plans
 Public Hearings/Outreach/Meetings
 Community Outreach, Engagement and Facilitation
 Data Collection & Analysis
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
Traffic operations analysis bridges the gap between
transportation planning, traffic engineering, and design. AMG engineers and planners have many years of experience in analyzing traffic operations in saturated urban or under‐ saturated rural environments to develop realistic solutions to complex traffic issues. They use state‐of‐the‐art microscopic computer simulation software, such as Transyt, Synchro, CORSIM, and VISSIM to perform traffic operations and traffic simulation analyses. Based on the extensive operations
analysis and safety analysis, we can determine the roadway geometry, signing and striping details, signal operations and lane geometry, transition lengths, and lane widths. The operations details are then incorporated into the design plans/PS&E, including construction and bidding supports.

COMPLETE STREET DESIGN/ BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN
A Complete Street accommodates all users regardless of
ability and offers a range of transportation modes from walking to freight movement, as well as the activities generated by adjacent land uses, such as sidewalk cafés, on‐street parking, urban forestry and open space, and social interaction. We understand that designing streets for all users, specifically the disabled, children,senior citizens, and otherswith unique transportation needs, involves a multidisciplinary approach. Our approach includes peeling back the layers of a street’s obvious and visible functions to fully understand its hidden, lesser known, and indirect functions to provide reasonable and practical solutions that do not detract from the roadway and transportation network functionality.

TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM DESIGN AND TIMING
Our partner AMG has the expertise to provide a full‐range of traffic signal planning, design, and City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 15 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
construction services from isolated signalized intersections to computer‐ based traffic signalsystems. They have prepared traffic signal and intersection designs at hundreds of locations across the nation. Their experience ranges from simple, single‐intersection designs to complex multi‐phase signals, interstate interchanges, and problematic design constraints resolution. This experience involves different system types and communication media, including Time‐Based Coordination (non‐interconnected), microwave‐based coordination, hardwire interconnect with an on‐street master controller, spread spectrum radio, PC‐based systems (closed loop systems), central computer systems, and fiber optic cable. Their extensive experience in traffic control system design includes traffic control and advance warning signals; lane control and counter flow systems; and special purpose traffic systems.

Their experience also includes numerous advance warning, emergency vehicle, and railway preemption signal design and has undertaken signal preemption and detector technology studies for clients.

ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
While building an entire new transportation network isn’t feasible, AMG has been using ITS to help with the increasing traffic congestion. They apply ITS technology to the transportation infrastructure to manage and improve the reliability and efficiency of the transportation network. Their core strength has been in deploying Adaptive Traffic Control System (ATCS). Their team has been educating traffic engineers and practitioners on the benefits of ATCS and the need to plan funding opportunities to keep the system operational. AMG hasrecently been involvedwith the deployment of more than 20 adaptive signalsystems in the United States that are helping to relieve traffic congestion.

AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES (ATSPM)
The ability to look at performance measures such as “percent arrivals on red” and look at occurrences of split failures for individual intersections, or groups of intersections, is revolutionizing the overall Traffic Signal Maintenance and Operations (TSM&O) performance at progressive cities and DOTs. AMG staff are assisting in the deployment of ATSPM to manage and monitor signal systems for multiple cities and jurisdictions including the City of Irvine, City of Hayward, City of Concord, and City of Dublin. Their professionals are working alongside the City of Dublin to set up the software for ATSPMs and assist city staff to understand the software, coordinate installation, generate reports, identify anomalies, and train staff on best practices.

INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
The AMG team has the capacity to provide expert technicalservice for every aspect of ITS. AMG is a leader in the research and application of leading ITS solutions and the design and deployment of ITS systems.

Expertise includes field integration of CCTV systems, automated incident detection, dynamic message signing, and driver information displays. The future of technology for transportation includes new approaches to managing traffic congestion, improving safety, and providing transit passengers with real‐ time travel information. AMG has combined ITS with a full range of transportation/transit services to provide new solutions to the challenges facing transportation agencies and authorities.

GRANT AND FEDERAL PROJECTS
When we work with you to prepare grant applications, our primary goal is to obtain enough information to match your needswith available grantsto fund your projects. We develop an application strategy, assess the project, prepare the application, and provide technicalsupport forstate and federally funded projects.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 16 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
We have excellent working relationships with funding agencies that help us create an effective approach to producing winning grant applications.

PUBLIC HEARING/COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
Communicating concepts and technical materials is critical to the success of any transportation project.

We routinely help our clients manage public participation and community outreach to educate and build consensus between governing agencies, stakeholders, and potential project opponents.

BSK: Geotechnical Engineering and Material Testing
The BSK geotechnical team will be the technical subconsultant partner that will assist the City with geotechnical engineering services, such as preparation of geotechnical paper studies that rely on existing subsurface data and geologic mapping, geotechnical investigations, geotechnical peer reviews, geotechnical review of plans and specifications, as well as as‐needed consultation and responses to RFI’s and submittals during construction. BSK and the geotechnical engineers who willsupport this contract also have the capacity to support the AnchorCM team to manage Quality Assurance materials testing and special inspection services during construction. These services would include laboratory testing in BSK’s 5000 square foot Caltrans and AASHTO‐certified materials laboratory, compaction testing, rebar inspection, batch plant inspection, concrete sampling and testing, asphalt concrete sampling and testing, masonry inspection, torque testing, epoxy dowel inspection, anchor inspections, shop welding inspection, and field welding inspection. BSK’s field staff have extensive working knowledge of the various building codes and materials compliance testing procedures and are adept in applying their expertise.

3. Land Development Review and Permitting Services
Larry’s experience in land development review included performing the day‐to‐day land development engineering work for the Dougherty Valley development, the largest recent development processed by the Contra Costa County Public Works. At Orinda, Larry oversaw the Wilder Development, the largest recent development in Orinda.

AnchorCM is pleased to partner with CSG and BSK to perform these services. While Larry will provide general oversight of this work as Clayton’s City Engineer, CSG will perform the bulk of these services with the support of BSK, if necessary. This is the same type of arrangement Larry successfully implemented for Orinda. Although not identified in this Request for Proposal, AnchorCM recommends that the City designate a City Surveyor. Since most of the City Surveyor work will be related to land development activities, CSG is proposing David Rubcic, a California registered Land Surveyor to serve as City’s Surveyor.

Below are CSG’s approaches to land development review and surveying.

New Development Entitlements
 Review tentative maps, tentative parcel maps, architectural review, and other entitlement applications. Coordinate review with other City staff and/or outside agencies as needed.  Attend follow‐up meetings with Planning staff, the applicant, or others as needed to resolve issues regarding the proposal. Review subsequent submittals of the proposal.  Assist the City with development of conditions of approval, development agreements, and other requirements associated with development applications. Assist City in negotiating with developers regarding terms of agreements or conditions(Additional tasks associated with the entitlement process are described above).

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 17 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Plan Review
Review final maps, improvement plans, and landscape plans. Review includes evaluation of required records, studies, grading and improvement plan, and additional materials submitted by the design professional. Confirm that plans conform to City standard design criteria, conditions of approval, and infrastructure or other master plans.
 Each plan review will be accompanied with a letter summarizing the red‐line comments addressed to the applicant’s engineer or landscape architect, with a copy to City staff and the applicant. A complete red‐lined set of drawings and any reports will be returned to the design professionalsfor use in their corrections. At the applicant’s discretion, the commentsummary letter and red‐lined plan sheets can be scanned and submitted electronically to the design consultant to expedite the review process.
 Although we understand that meetings will not be required, CSG is available to meet with the applicant/representative and City staff to review comments or to delineate the standards which are not being met, in order to facilitate timely completion of the review and meeting the maximum goal of two plan checks. CSG will accept and review subsequent submittals electronically, when feasible, in order to expedite the review process.  Soils reports will be evaluated and confirmation of recommendations will be included on the plans. Boundary conditions will be evaluated to maintain continuity with surrounding properties and maintain existing drainage patterns.
 Construction erosion control and post‐construction water quality control will be evaluated for compliance with the storm water quality management permit in effect for the City.  Assist the City with development of conditions of approval, development agreements, and other requirements associated with development applications. Assist City in negotiating with developers regarding terms of agreements or conditions (Additional tasks associated with the entitlement process are described above).
 Confirm that the developer has obtained necessary permits or approvals from other public agencies as needed, and that plans conform to the City’s NPDES Municipal Regional Permit requirements for storm water treatment and detention.
 Review and recommend approval of engineering bond estimates and subdivision guarantees.  Assist the staff in preparing subdivision improvement agreements, other agreements (including stormwatertreatment measure and landscape maintenance agreements), and staff reports.
 Meet with developers, consultants, and other agencies on behalf of staff, as requested.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 18 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Plan Review Submittals Schedule
Development of hard‐and‐fast schedules for completion of development review and plan review work is difficult as timing and scope of projects is not always known. Examples of time frames for completing certain tasks are provided below.

TYPE TIME FRAME
Pre‐application entitlement
review
Review application material in advance of requested meetings; complete formal comments and submit to Planning within two weeks of meeting
Review Tentative Map
Application or Other
Entitlement Package
Fifteen (15) working days of notice of submittal by City Prepare Conditions of
Approval
Prepare within one week of request by Planning, or within reasonable shorter time frame if needed to meet hearing date
Complete Improvement
Plan (1st Check)
Fifteen (15) working days of notice of submittal by City Complete Subsequent
Improvement Plan as
Needed
Ten (10) working days of notice of submittal by City
Prepare fee estimate,
review bond estimate, or
prepare permit
Ten (10) working days of request
Miscellaneous Assignments Dependent on scope; typically between five (5) and ten (10) working days
Turnaround times include pickup, QA/QC, and delivery.

CITY SURVEYOR ‐ MAP REVIEW SERVICES
The traditional role of the City Surveyor is to ensure that maps, legal descriptions, and plats prepared for private developments are technically correct. However, more often than not, the City Surveyor will also ensure that the documents are comprehensive of City requirements and completed in accordance with the California Subdivision Map Act and local ordinances (traditionally the functions of the City Engineer).

The City Surveyor’s daily functions include reviewing the documents submitted by private developers, owners, engineers or surveyors, review and provide comments, and sign final documents when approved.

The City Surveyor customarily also meets with and advises the City Engineer and private applicants when complicated or unusual circumstances arise.

Detailed Scope of Work
Under the “Map Review” scope of work, our CSG team proposes to review Final Maps, Parcel Maps, Lot Line Adjustments, Lot Mergers, or other documents per the following:
 Review for compliance with the approved Tentative Map and Conditions of Approval (maps)  Review for compliance with the California Subdivision Map Act  Review for compliance with the Professional Land Surveyor’s Act  Review of closure calculations
 Review of title information for the property, including existing easements and any other relevant land encumbrances, based on information contained in a preliminary title report and other documents to be furnished by applicant
 Review of record documents (deeds and maps) of the subject and adjacent properties City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 19 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
 Review, seal and sign final Mylar copies and certificates as Acting City Surveyor or Technical Reviewer
 Preparation of Staff Report for City Council Approval, if required  Conformance with the project improvement plans and other documents Legal Documents
The types of legal documents that may be prepared by the City include Parcel Maps, Lot Line Adjustments, and Lot Mergers. Additionally, plats and legal descriptions may need to be prepared for public projects that require right‐of‐way take. For street dedication or vacation documents, as well as easement grants and abandonments, the burden of preparing the plats and legal descriptions are typically put on the private party in conjunction with private development of the affected parcel(s). Those documents may, however, also be prepared as stand‐alone documents/instruments by the City Surveyor. Lastly, records of survey may also be prepared if dictated by the Professional Land Surveyor’s Act.

All documents are produced using the same level of care and quality control as mapping reviews, and prepared in conformity to the following legal codes:

California Subdivision Map Act
 Professional Land Surveyor’s Act
 Streets and Highways Code
 Civil Code
 Other relevant sections of the Government Code
In addition, all maps or certificates are prepared using local industry standards and pre‐established City requirements.

Working closely with CSG would be BSK for geotechnical issues. BSK will assist the City with geotechnical engineering services, such as preparation of geotechnical peer review and, geotechnical review of plans and specifications.

4. Annual Administration/Assessments Levy Services
AnchorCM is pleased to partner with F&A to perform these services. AnchorCM will provide general oversight including the role of the GHAD Manager. F&A will provide the administration and assessment levy services. If it is necessary for the GHAD requires geotechnical engineering work, BSK will provide the geotechnical engineering services.

F&A
Our partner Francisco & Associates (“F&A”) and Anchor understands the history and circumstances surrounding each agency’s special financing districts are different and the revenue generated is critical to long‐term viability. For this reason, we take a comprehensive approach to managing special financing districts and working with public sector clients. For the City, our approach will begin with establishing a strong foundation for the City’s Special Financing Districts (the “SFDs” or “Districts”) that is not only compliant with the existing legal landscape for assessments but will also be based on the following principles and practices: accountability, consistency, efficiency, effectiveness, and transparency.

We understand that the administration of assessment districts is not just database work, updating an engineer’s report, and placement of assessments on the property tax roll but rather being an extension of City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 20 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
staff that may be expected to coordinatewith multiple City departments and represent the City by assisting with community outreach and education. We take this responsibility very seriously which is why we will undertake a comprehensive onboarding process if we are given the opportunity to serve the City. The purpose of onboarding is to familiarize ourselves with the nuances of your SFD Program and build strong relationships with the City departments and personnel that we will be working with on a regular basis.

Our onboarding process will be led by your Assessment Engineer, Eduardo Espinoza, P.E. and Project Manager, Brian Brown, and begins with a kickoff meeting to better understand the City’s goals, objectives, timelines, and important history surrounding the Districts. Following the kickoff meeting we will interview City staff, as necessary. Interviewing staff helps us identify the role and responsibilities of individuals who are involved in the various tasks that impact the SFD Program. This provides a better understanding of the process and procedures, workflow, internal and external timelines, and specific challenges facing City departments and their personnel which includes the dynamics and priorities of City Council.

An audit of the District parcel databases, fiscal review of the Districts, review of formation and administration documents including improvement diagrams, and review of the City’s past approach to managing the Districts will also be essential elements of our onboarding process with the City.

F&A and Anchor will audit the City’s existing District parcel databases to confirm that all parcels within the boundaries of the Districts and any zones of benefit are captured correctly and that no parcels outside the District’s boundaries are included. Our review of the District parcel databases will include a review of the parcels to confirm property characteristics and their land use are assigned correctly, the correct zone has been assigned to each parcel when applicable, a review of the maximum and applied assessment rates, and that each parcel has been assessed correctly based on the methodology within the Engineer’s Reports or formation documents. The purpose of this review is to ensure the City receives all the revenue it is entitled to and that the District data is accurate because it is the foundation in which the City bases decisions.

The purpose of our fiscal review of the Districts are to get a sense of the overall fiscal health of the Districts any zones of benefit. The review includes a look at the assessment capacity of each District, the amount historically levied for each District/zone, fund balances (operating and capital reserves), budgets, and upcoming capital improvement/replacement needs. This fiscal review will result in identifying which Districts have surpluses, deficits, and those which may need to be monitored more closely due to limited revenue capacity. This review assists in discussions with City staff that may be underfunded or may soon become underfunded.

The F&A project team will review formation and administration documents and the diagrams showing all existing improvements. The primary purpose of this review is to ensure the annual Engineer’s Report is congruent with the formation/annexation documents, confirm the quantification of special and general benefits by improvement type are appropriately documented and supported, that only parcelsthatreceive a special benefit are assessed, and that the City is complying with the provisions of Proposition 218 and case law. Ourreviewoften resultsin recommendationsto strengthen the Engineer’s Report andwill inform the City of potential issues related to compliance with state law.

The collective efforts of our onboarding process will provide a deeper understanding of the Districtsin Year 1, that would otherwise take years. We fully expect these efforts will result in more concise documents, better policies, efficient procedures, clearer communication, and a more effective and transparent SFD Program that functions consistent with industry best practices. The F&A approach to onboarding new City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 21 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
clients demonstrates our commitment to keep staff informed of the annual administrative process and notify staff immediately of any issues or inconsistencies. Our goal is to position ourselves as the City’s expert resource and an extension of staff by being extremely proactive, not reactive. The scope of services on the following pages were drafted for the City to address the requirements outlined in Exhibit A, Section 4 of the City’s RFP.

Homes and hills in Clayton, CA
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 22 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Section 2e: References
Below we have included references for our team and partners.

AnchorCM:

City of Orinda
Steve Salomon, Former City Manager
(559) 393‐6830
City of Orinda
David Biggs, City Manager
(925) 253‐4220
City of Orinda
Amy Worth, Councilmember and former Mayor
(925) 212‐4511
Contra Costa County
Warren Lai, Deputy Public Works Director
(925) 313‐2180
Town of Moraga
Shawn Knapp, Public Works Director/Town
Engineer
(925) 888‐7027
CSG
City of Albany
Mark Hurley, PE, Public Works Director/City
Engineer
(415) 850‐7058
City of Pleasanton
Adam Nelkie, Senior Engineer
(925) 818‐4418
City of San Leandro
Jerome Ababa, PE, Associate Engineer
(510) 577‐3412
AMG
City of Concord
Abhishek Parikh, Transportation Engineer
925.671.3129
City of Hayward
Charmine Solla, P.E., T.E., Traffic Engineer
510.583.4730
City of San Rafael
Rafat Raie, Deputy Director of Public Works,
415.485.3473
BSK
City of Pleasanton
Adam Nelkie, PE, Senior Civil Engineer
(925) 931‐5676
City of Berkeley
Tiffany Pham, PE, QSD, Associate Civil Engineer
(510) 981‐6427
Contra Costa County Public Works Department,
Slava Gospodchikov, PE, Engineering Services
Division Manager
(925) 313‐2316
F&A
City of Brentwood
Aaron Wanden, Park Maintenance Manager
(925) 516‐5111
City of Hercules
Mike Roberts, Public Works Director
(510) 799‐8241
City of Oakley
Kevin Rohani, City Engineer/Public Works
Director
(925) 625‐7003
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 23 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Section 2f: Schedule of Key Dates
AnchorCM has reviewed the schedule in the RFP and can comply with it as is. If chosen, AnchorCM has the capacity to commence work in the second half of March 2022. If possible, it will be helpful to overlap with the existing consultant to transition work. Based on our understanding of past City practices, the term is for one year with the potential for annual renewal.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 24 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Section 2g: Modifications or Objections
AnchorCM is proposing the following modifications to the City’s agreement:

Section 7(a): Preference is to use the phrase: “endeavor to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and codes…”
Section 8: Add “Consultant makes no warranties, guarantees, express or implied, under this Agreement or otherwise in connection with consultants services.”
Section 11:
a. ii. (1) Better to say: “or Insurer’s equivalent”.
a. iii. (7) Better to say: “Contractual Liability for non‐professional services claims with respect to this Contract.”
a. v. Better to say: “or endorsements applicable when required by written contract or agreement”. d. Requires coverage for contractual liability under the Professional Liability policy, which is not available.

Professional Liability policies include an exclusion for liability assumed by contract, unless the firm would be liable in the absence of the contract. Better to say: “to include limited contractual liability applicable to this Agreement”
e. ii. The exception is professional liability. Defense costs are not in addition to the limits. Defense costs due erode the policy limits.
g. v. The exception for separation of insured is the professional liability policy Section 12(a): Omit: “volunteer” and “agents” from indemnified parties.

Section 12(b):

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: “This duty does not include the duty to pay for or to provide an upfront defense against claims or allegations arising out of the subject matter of this clause.” Replace the phrase: “that arise out of, pertain to, or related to” with the phrase: “to the extend actually caused by”.

Section 28: Preference to include: “The Consultant shall not be responsible for delays from any and all causes beyond its reasonable control.”
Add: “In the event of any dispute between the Partiesrelated to this Agreement or this Project, the Parties agree to first negotiate in good faith toward a resolutionwith participation by representatives of each Party holding sufficient authority to resolve the dispute. Ifsuch dispute cannot be resolved in this manner, before any action or litigation is initiated other than as required to secure lien rights, the dispute shall be submitted to mediation using the American Arbitration Association or another mediator as mutually selected by the Parties. Such mediation shall be completed within a reasonable period of time following either Party’s written demand with each Party to bear an equal share of the mediation fees and its own respective attorney and consultant fees and costs.”
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 25 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Section 2h: Cost of Services

1. City Engineering
Based on review of the City’s agreement with the existing engineering consultant, the past practice is for AnchorCM to propose a monthly minimum along with hour rates and charges.

For the monthly minimum, AnchorCM is proposing a monthly fee of $13,636.

This is based on the following:

Estimate overall hours between 15‐20 per weeks, assumed 15 hours o Larry Theis: 7 hours at the Project Principal rate of $239   = $1,673 o Jason Chen: 8 hours at the Senior Engineer rate of $217    =$1,736 o Subtotal per week =$3,409
o Multiply the subtotal per week by 4 for a monthly rate =$13,636 If the actual hours exceed this estimate regularly (3 months or more) or excessively (more than 20% in any given month), AnchorCM reserves the right to notify the City that additional hours are necessary for a particular month(s) at the hourly rates provided. This would be agreed upon by the City prior to commencement of work.

If technical studies (such as formal traffic study, traffic counts, etc.) or field surveys are required from subconsultants, the additional costs will be billed based on the subconsultant fees plus 10%. These types of costs will be above the monthly minimum.

Please reference rate sheets in appendix b for hourly rates for services.

2. General Engineering Services (non‐General Fund Capital Projects) It is not feasible to estimate the costs for the non‐general fund capital projects at this point. Each project will need to be evaluate separately. AnchorCM and the subconsultant teams have submitted hourly rates. Please see Appendix b for the hourly rate tables. A separate proposal will need to be prepared for each capital project. In addition, grant requirements may require the City to perform separate solicitations.

3. Land Development Review and Permitting Services
Due to the difficulty in estimating land development activities, it is not feasible to estimate the monthly costs for land development review and permitting services. The cost will be billed based on subconsultant fees plus 10%.

Please reference rate sheets in appendix b for hourly rates for services.

4. Annual Administration/Assessments Levy Services
AnchorCM will provide general oversight of the assessment districts. The oversight costs will be included as part of the City Engineering costs, except for the GHAD Manager duties. AnchorCM is proposing an annual fee of $2,390. This is the assumption of 10 hours per year for Larry Theis at the Project Principal rate of $239. This is in addition to Francisco & Associates’ cost proposal.

Please reference rate sheets in appendix b for hourly rates for services.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 26 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Francisco & Associates, Inc. proposes the following lump sum fees to provide the Scope of Services outlined in the proposal.

ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
Oakhurst Geological Hazard Abatement District Annual Administration Fee $2,500 per year Street Light Assessment District Annual Administration Fee   $3,500 per year High Street Bridge Assessment District Annual Administration Fee   $500 per year Lydia Lane Sewer Assessment District Annual Administration Fee   $500 per year Oak Street Bridge Assessment District Annual Administration Fee    $500 per year Oak Street Sewer Assessment District Annual Administration Fee   $500 per year Diablo Estates Benefit Assessment District Annual Administration Fee $3,500 per year

REIMBURSABLES
Reimbursable expenses such as overnight mailings, recordation fees, mileage, County maps and data are in addition to the lump sum fees above and will be billed at cost plus 10%, but reimbursables will not exceed $500. Mileage will be billed at the annual Federal mileage rate ($0.58 per mile).

If it is necessary for the GHAD requires geotechnical engineering work, BSK will provide the geotechnical engineering services, such as preparation of geotechnical paper studies that rely on existing subsurface data and geologic mapping, geotechnical investigations, geotechnical peer reviews, geotechnical review of plans and specifications, as well as as‐needed consultation and responses to RFI’s and submittals during construction. It is not possible to determine the scope at this point and separate cost proposal will be presented at a later date to the City if necessary.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 27 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Appendix a – Resumes of Key Personnel (continued from Section 2c) Jason Chen, P.E.

Engineering Manager
Experience Summary
Jason has over 22 years of engineering experience with over 17 years in municipal engineering for public agencies. Jason has worked County and City levels of government, specifically in engineering and public works. He brings these skills to AnchorCM to consult and provide services to Northern California agency clients.

Experience
22 years
Education/Training
UCLA: B.S. Civil &
Environmental
Engineering, B.A.

Economics.

UCLA Extension:

Professional Designation
in Construction
Management
Affiliations
American Public Works
Association
Select Relevant Project Experience:

City of Orinda, City Engineer (2017‐2021)
Public Works and Engineering Operations
Responsible for capital improvement projects, engineering, and lighting and landscape district. Highlights include oversaw capital projects, recovered $3 million emergency rainstorm disaster relief funds, presented and prepared of staff reports and resolution for City Council, public outreach for projects and new programs, worked closely with City Attorneys on flooding and landslide case, procured regional and federal grants for projects, CCTA Technical Coordination Committee member, and performed Acting Director of Public Works and Engineering duties for extended period of time.

City of Orinda
Parking Program, City Engineer
Project Value, 2018‐2021
Created a residential and a commuter permit parking programs as well as a new red flag parking restriction program for a high‐risk fire zone.

City of Orinda
2017 Storm Damaged Projects, Senior Civil Engineer

3.5 million, 2017‐2019
Senior Civil Engineer focused on emergency federal funding recovery efforts Emergency repair of 72” diameter collapsed corrugated metal culvert, landslides, and other storm related damages. Recovered all eligible expenses from CalOES, FEMA, and FHWA.

City of Orinda
Downtown‐Bryant Way ADA Ramp & lighting, Project Manager $1 million, 2017
Installing new switchback ADA accessible ramp structure with City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 28 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Jason Chen P.E
Engineering
Manager
landscaping and overhead lighting.

Contra Costa County
Iron Horse Corridor Mgmt. Program, Iron Horse Corridor Manager Project Value, 2016‐2017
Manage the 18.5 miles right of way of the Iron Horse Corridor for public use as well as providing staff support to the Iron Horse Corridor Management Program Advisory Committee.

Contra Costa County
Special Districts, Special Districts Manager
Project Value, 2014‐2017
Contra Costa Special Districts operations includes landscaping, park and recreation programs, street lighting, transit, wastewater collection and treatment, and water treatment. Oversaw the implementation of 8 EBRPD Measure WW funded capital projects that included, bocce courts, new/modified play structures, a new mini‐park, a new plaza, landscape upgrades, a new trail, and a new concession/announcer building.

Contra Costa County
Highway Bridge Program, Associate Civil Engineer
Project Value, 2010‐2013
Managed Contra Costa County’s bridge projects, investigated scour critical bridges, established plan of actions, and applied for HBP funding for new bridge projects.

Contra Costa County
Iron Horse Pedestrian Overcrossing at Treat Boulevard, Project MGR $16 million, 2007 to 2010
This pedestrian/bicycle crossing allow Iron Horse Trail user to safely cross over a busy 8‐lane roadway. This bridge is also the gate way to the Contra Costa Centre Transit Village. This project won the 2011 California Transportation Foundation Project of the Year, the 2011 California Greenway and Trail Association Construction Award, and the 2012 IDEAS2 award for innovation in structural steel design from the American Institute of Steel Construction.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 29 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Education/Training
M.S. Transportation
Engineering/Operations
Research, University of
Delaware
M.Eng Transportation
Engineering, University of
Tokyo
B.Tech (hons) Civil, Indian
Institute of Technology,
Kharagpur, West Bengal
Skills
ITS System Review &
Needs Assessment
Traffic Operations
Joy Bhattacharya, PE
Innovative Transportation Planning and ITS Expert
Experience Summary
Joy is AMG’s Vice President of Innovative Transportation Solutions. Joy has in‐depth experience in the development, design and
implementation of various engineering strategies in major metropolitan areas, including Adaptive/Responsive Traffic Signal Systems and Transit Priority Systems; Incident Management Plans; design of automated Electronic Toll Collection systems; preparation of PS&E for field implementation of CCTV, Changeable Message Signs, Highway Advisory Radio, Ramp Metering and ATMS systems; and freeway and arterial operations using micro‐simulation. Local projects to his credit include the GoMentum Station V2X Signal Lab, CAV Program, SAV FM/LM pilot program at San Ramon, Mountain House ATMS, City of Hayward Adaptive Signal Systems, Webster Street SMART Corridor System, SR‐4 and I‐80 Integrated Corridor Management, and the Santa Clara VTA Capitol Corridor Transportation Study. Joy has been involved with traffic signal systems for over 25 years on design, operations, maintenance, and inspection of signal systems and implementation of backend Traffic Management Centers.

Joy spearheaded the effort of planning and building the V2X traffic signal lab at GoMentum Station with the capability of testing applications related to DSRC and CV2X communication. Joy is currently managing the ATSPM grants for the Cities of Hayward, Dublin, San Rafael, Walnut Creek and Concord, which includes implementation of DSRC based Conditional Transit Priorities along corridor and getting high resolution data from the traffic signal system.

Traffic Management
Centers
Knowledge of Existing &
Emerging Transportation
Technologies
Innovative Congestion
Management Strategies
Stakeholder Coordination
Select Relevant Project Experience:

City of Concord
V2X Signal Lab, GoMentum Station, Project Manager
Joy led the design and implementation effort of a state‐of‐the‐art CAV V2X Signal Lab at GoMentum Station, that will be dedicated to research, training, and testing of CAV hardware and software technologies. Traffic engineers in Contra Costa County and the Bay Area will have access to traffic signal cabinets, multiple traffic signal controllers, video detection, DSRC/5G communication, and other traffic signal related equipment, to test the connectivity and safe crossing of CAVs equipped with On‐Board Units (OBUs) and traffic signal controllers equipped with DSRC/5G technology. The significance of this effort is that City traffic engineers will no longer need to use their own maintenance shop and scarce resources for testing AV connectivity for safety. The unique environment of the VzX Signal Lab City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 30 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Joy Bhattacharya, PE
Innovative
Transportation
Planning and ITS
Expert
will expose traffic engineers and technicians to the complexities of signal deployment and prepare us for future CAV operations, including setup and maintenance of traffic signal controllers, conflict monitors, load switches, detection and DSRC/5G based communication systems on traffic signal cabinets. The lab offers the opportunity for hands‐on experience working with futuristic traffic signals and associated technologies, testing various CAV and DSRC functional services, including collision avoidance, ATSPM, Emergency Vehicle Preemption, Vulnerable User Services, V2V, V2I, V2P, and V2C communications.

Additionally, the lab is poised to educate and train signal technicians and traffic engineers in both the public and private sectors.

Alameda and Contra Costa County
I‐80 Integrated Corridor Mobility Project, Project Manager AMG staff were responsible for evaluating the existing system and providing solution by designing, developing, and implementing communication between the field elements and the TMC and between the City TMC and Regional TMC. Staff worked closely with 11 cities and 2 transit agencies to implement the system. AMG staff is responsible for the successful implementation and operation of all the advanced strategies implemented as part of the project. The project included the implementation and integration of traffic and transit operations strategies including adaptive ramp metering, ramp metering priority for transit, traffic operations systems, active traffic management, and incident management along a 19.5‐mile section of I‐80 between the Bay Bridge Toll Plaza and the Carquinez Bridge. In addition to the freeway improvements, the project consists of local arterial and transit improvements along San Pablo Avenue, including signal
synchronization, transit signal priority and flush plan for incidents.

Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS)
Design for Route 238 Improvements, Project Manager
Joy managed the evaluation and design of an Advanced Traffic Management System with adaptive coordination capabilities. The design plans were completed on a fast‐track schedule, and the roadway improvements and signal modifications are now under construction. ITS services for the project included: Developing the ATMS functional requirements: Preparing draft and Final Concept of Operations reports: Analyzing traffic detection and communications requirements and Evaluating adaptive control traffic signal systems and selecting the system that most effectively meets the City’s signal system requirements. In addition to preparing traffic signal, pavement delineation and signing plans, Joy also designed the detection and fiber optic/copper signal interconnect at 32 intersections.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 31 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Joy Bhattacharya, PE
Innovative
Transportation
Planning and ITS
Expert
Caltrans District 6
Fresno 180 Braided Ramp Design/Fresno, Project Manager‐ITS The overall purpose of the project was to improve traffic operations, reduce congestion, and enhance traffic safety within the freeway‐to‐ freeway interchanges between SR 180, SR41 and SR 168.  Joy was the PM for the traffic/ITS work needed for the project. ITS scope of work included the design of and plans for the overhead and roadway signage, the pavement delineation, and the electrical systems on the project.

Alameda County
Webster Street SMART Corridor Project, Project Manager
Joy was as the Project Manager for the Webster Street SMART Corridor Project. The project the developed a TSP system to reduce travel time along five AC Transit lines; designed traffic signal coordination systems along Webster Street and Constitution Way/Lincoln Avenue; designed a new traffic signal at Webster/Pacific Avenues and signal modifications at five intersections; designed and implemented an Advance (VDS); designed and implemented a CCTV system; and implemented an ATIS.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 32 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Education/Training
MS, Civil Engineering,
University of Idaho
BS, Civil Engineering,
University of Idaho
Cristiano Melo, PE, GE
Principal Geotechnical Engineer
Experience Summary
Mr. Melo will serve as the primary point of contact, project manager, and lead geotechnical engineer for BSK’s services for this contract. He is a licensed Civil and Geotechnical Engineer in the State of California with over 20 years of experience throughout the San Francisco Bay Area and Central Valley, supporting projects from design of shallow and deep foundations to retaining walls, geotechnical peer reviews, pavement rehabilitation studies, earthwork, hillside grading, site drainage, subgrade stabilization, slope stability analysis, ground improvement, and trenchless excavation. His project support focuses on geotechnical investigations, materials testing, and geotechnical peer review for numerous public works/capital improvements projects, including sewer/water/stormwater pipeline, wastewater treatment plant, pumping station, water tank, public building, parks, and roadway projects designed to Caltrans Standards.

Select Relevant Project Experience:

City of Brentwood
Shea Homes & Shea Trilogy Subdivisions, Independent Geotechnical Peer Review
Mr. Melo performed a peer review of the soil/bedrock expansion mitigation for two subdivisions as part of BSK’s on‐call geotechnical on‐call contract with the City. The objective of the peer review was to provide an independent assessment of the mitigation measures recommended by the Geotechnical Engineers‐of‐Record for the two subdivisions.

City of Dublin
Fallon Sports Phase 3 Improvements, Lead Geotechnical Engineer Mr. Melo is the lead geotechnical engineer for new facilities and other improvements at Fallon Sports Park and additional task orders under BSK’s on‐call agreement with the City. The project included two additional little league fields, cricket field, athletic field lights, sand volleyball courts, play area, and concrete flatwork/terrace seating.

City of Berkeley
1322 Glendale Avenue Retaining Wall, Project Manager and Lead Geotechnical Engineer
An existing retaining wall, approximately 150 feet long and up to about 7 feet high, along the west side of southbound Glendale Avenue City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 33 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
near 1322 Glendale Avenue is either failing or allowing subgrade soil Cristiano Melo, PE,
GE
Principal
Geotechnical
Engineer
underneath to erode. The erosion also caused settlement of the sidewalk, curb, and gutter, and asphalt pavement located behind the retaining wall. BSK performed a site reconnaissance, reviewed existing data, conducted a geotechnical investigation, and provided geotechnical recommendations for repairs. Construction for the new wall replacement started during the fall of 2021 and is due to be completed by the spring of 2022. The City retained BSK during construction to provide limited geotechnical observation services. Mr.

Melo was the Project Manager and lead geotechnical engineer.

City of Berkeley
San Pablo Avenue Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation, Project Manager & Lead Geotechnical Engineer
Mr. Melo served as the Project Manager and lead geotechnical engineer. The project involved the rehabilitation of existing 6‐ to 10‐ inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) sewer main segments located within the Caltrans right‐of‐way. Borings were strategically located outside the Caltrans right‐of‐way.

Contra Costa County Public Works
Happy Valley Road Embankment Repair, Project Manager & Lead Geotechnical Engineer
Mr. Melo was the lead geotechnical engineer and Project Manager for the geotechnical investigation for this project which was a task order to BSK’s on‐call agreement with the County. A landslide removed the asphalt‐paved shoulder and a portion of the northbound lane on Happy Valley Road adjacent to an intermittent creek located approximately 1,000 feet southeast of the intersection with Bear Creek Road in unincorporated Contra Costa County. Slope stability analyses were performed for various repair options.

Casa Montego Senior Housing
Satellite Housing/Casa Montego II, Project Manager & Lead Engineer Mr. Melo served as Project Manager and lead engineer for the geotechnical investigation and earthwork construction observation and testing for 2 interconnected 2‐story buildings with a total footprint area of approximately 13,000 square feet. Due to space constraints and the proximity of an existing nearby senior housing building, the cut slope to the south of the site was retained by a soldier pile wall with tiebacks and a three‐tiered tieback wall. Both walls had shotcrete facing.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 34 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Cristiano Melo, PE,
GE
Principal
Geotechnical
Engineer
City of Oakley
Oakley Recreation Center, Project Manager & Lead Geotechnical Engineer
Mr. Melo was the Project Manager and lead geotechnical engineer for the geotechnical investigation and construction monitoring services for a new recreation center. The project included two approximately 10,000‐square foot buildings, an amphitheater, an athletic field with natural turf, asphalt concrete paved parking and driveways, underground utilities, landscaping, and bioswales/infiltration basins.

City of Tracy
Holly Drive and Arbor Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation, Independent Geotechnical Peer Review
Mr. Melo performed a peer review of the geotechnical investigation and pavement rehabilitation measures, particularly focused on full depth reclamation as part of BSK’s on‐call geotechnical on‐call contract with the City. The objective of the peer review was to provide an independent assessment of the soil/bedrock expansion mitigation measures recommended by the Geotechnical Engineers‐of‐Record for the two subdivisions.

City of Vallejo
New Police Headquarters, Project Manager and Lead Geotechnical Engineer
Mr. Melo serves as the Project Manager and lead geotechnical engineer for the geotechnical investigation. An existing 15‐year‐old 2‐ story commercial building with a footprint area of approximately 30,000 square feet is being seismically retrofit to a Risk Category IV, Essential Services Building. Site challenges include shallow groundwater and long‐term settlement associated with Bay Mud. To address these challenges, the new building additions will be supported on deep foundations consisting of drilled piers and raising site grade via placement of new fill will be kept to a minimum.

Hayward Area Recreation and Park District
Via Toledo Park, Project Manager and Lead Geotechnical Engineer Mr. Melo was the Project Manager and lead geotechnical engineer for the investigation of a new neighborhood park with a footprint area of approximately 2 acres. The project includes a half‐court basketball court, play areas, fitness equipment, picnic areas, plaza, shade structure, and decomposed granite pathway. He is also managing BSK’s support during construction.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 35 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Cristiano Melo, PE,
GE
Principal
Geotechnical
Engineer
Stanislaus County
Crows Landing Road Improvements, Geotechnical Engineer
Mr. Melo served as the geotechnical engineer for the pavement rehabilitation and widening of approximately 1,500 feet of Crows Landing Road. Rehabilitation measures being considered include asphalt rubber chip seal interlayer and asphalt concrete overlay, asphalt concrete overlay, and full‐depth reclamation.

City of Suisun City
McCoy Creek Trail Phase II, Project Manager and Lead Geotechnical Engineer
Mr. Melo served as the Project Manager and lead geotechnical engineer for the geotechnical investigation extending an existing 10‐ foot‐wide concrete pathway along the western bank of McCoy Creek from Pintail Drive north to Laurel Creek, where a single‐span, 175‐foot long, prefabricated pedestrian/bicycle bridge will be installed, connecting the north and south banks of Laurel Creek. Other improvements will include shade structures, wayfinding signs, minor landscaping, lighting, and bioretention areas. The total length of the trail will be approximately ¾‐mile in length.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 36 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Education/Training
MS, Civil Engineering,
University of California,
Berkley
BS, Civil Engineering,
University of Washington
Carrie Foulk, PE, GE
Senior Geotechnical Engineer/Geotechnical Group
Manager
Experience Summary
Ms. Foulk has over 20 years of geotechnical engineering experience providing geotechnical engineering consulting for public and private sector clients, including local area government agencies, school districts, wastewater districts, and commercial developers. Her expertise covers many levels of project responsibility including scoping, conducting field and laboratory investigations, performing engineering analyses, preparing reports, performing peer reviews, and coordinating and providing construction services.

Skills
Civil Engineer, California,
No. 62240, 2001
Geotechnical Engineer,
California, No. 3016, 2013
Select Relevant Project Experience:

Alameda County
Crow Canyon Road Edge Repairs, Independent Geotechnical Peer Review
Ms. Foulk provided a peer review of geotechnical report as part of BSK’s geotechnical on‐call contract with the County for four locations along the outboard edge of the roadway where slope instabilities were identified. Services were limited to providing an independent assessment of the project report
City of Livermore
On‐Call Geotechnical and Materials Testing, Project Manager Ms. Foulk is the Project Manager of the On‐Call Geotechnical Engineering and Materials Testing and Inspection contract with the City. The contract consists of providing materials testing and inspection, geotechnical engineering investigations, and environmental consultation. Projects have included over 60 task orders to‐date to include materials testing for roadway and civil infrastructure projects, as well as a geotechnical investigation and infiltration testing for a hydromodification basin project and geotechnical engineer‐of‐record services for their $8.1 million, 6,750 sf Civic Center Meeting Hall project where BSK assumed the geotechnical engineer‐of‐record role and supported the project during construction with materials testing and special inspections to include structural steel, reinforced concrete, and miscellaneous various specialty evaluation of construction materials requested by the City.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 37 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Carrie Foulk, PE, GE
Senior Geotechnical
Engineer/
Geotechnical Group
Engineer
City of Pleasanton
On‐Call Geotechnical & Materials Testing Services, Project Manager Ms. Foulk is the Project Manager of the On‐Call Geotechnical Engineering and Materials Testing and Inspection Contract with the City of Pleasanton of which BSK has held for the past 15+ years. The contract consists of providing materials testing and inspection, geotechnical engineering investigations, and geotechnical peer reviews.

West Las Positas Boulevard Failure Analysis Investigation W. Las Positas Boulevard from Santa Rita Road to Interstate 680, Project Manager
The roadway has experienced settlement and cracking over many years and has exhibited accelerated settlement over the last 10 years.

The settlement is not limited to the roadway but is widespread in this area, affecting homes and other structures. This part of Pleasanton is underlain by Holocene flood basin deposits. Portions of the roadway and surroundings was former marsh areas. BSK is investigating the subsurface conditions along the length of roadway by drilling and sampling various soil borings. She has been involved with 21 task orders to‐date to include: Fire Training Tower – Project included mapping of cracking and fire‐related damage to a seven‐level concrete training facility structure. Livermore‐Pleasanton Fire Department Fire Station #3 – Construction observation and testing of $7.5 million, 8,800‐square‐foot two‐story fire station. Bernal Community Park Phase I and II – Lead geotechnical engineer and Project Manager for the construction phase of the $16 million, 60‐acre Bernal Community Park. Independent Geotechnical Peer Review, Kiewit Property – Independent geotechnical engineering assessment of project specific documents for a 181 single‐family residential development and associated improvements. Val Vista Park Restroom – Forensic investigation into significant masonry wall cracking, including a geotechnical investigation, laboratory testing and conclusions on cause of cracking and settlement.

Alameda County
Fault Rupture Hazard Evaluation, Independent Geotechnical Peer Review
Ms. Foulk conducted a peer review of the project report for a new residential redevelopment for Alameda County as part of BSK’s geotechnical on‐call contract with the County. The objective of the review was limited to providing an independent assessment of the report based on the Alquist‐Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act of 1972 and California Geological Survey Note 49.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 38 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Carrie Foulk, PE, GE
Senior Geotechnical
Engineer/
Geotechnical Group
Manager
City of Fremont
New Band Pavilion at Central Park, Lead Engineer
Ms. Foulk served as the lead engineer during the geotechnical investigation the new band pavilion at Central Park in Fremont. The project consisted of the complete demolition and reconstruction of the former band pavilion and ancillary improvements.

City of Brentwood
Public Works Administration Building, Senior Geotechnical Engineer Ms. Foulk performed Geotechnical Senior Review for the preliminary geotechnical investigation for a new administration building. The project consists of an approximately 14,000 square‐foot, 1‐story, L‐ shaped building with a slab‐on‐grade floor. The new building extends over an area currently occupied by a 1‐story, approximately 2,000 square foot building, paved paving and driveways, concrete flatwork, and concrete walls.

City of Pleasanton
Yolanda Court Storm Drain Outfall Repair, Geotechnical Peer Review Ms. Foulk performed geotechnical peer review for the soils investigation for this emergency‐type erosion repair project. A slope containing a storm drain outfall failed/eroded during the 2016‐2017 rainy season, which resulted in an approximately 20‐foot‐high scarp along with disconnection and damage of the existing 36‐inch corrugated metal pipe.

Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Channel Widening, Senior Geotechnical Engineer
Ms. Foulk conducted a geotechnical investigation and
recommendations for new sheet pile walls for the purpose of widening an existing flood control channel. This work was conducted under BSK’s current geotechnical on‐call contract with the County. The subsurface conditions include several layers of liquefiable soils.

Recommendations included active pressures and passive resistance based on liquefied soil, seismic increment for the wall, and a site‐ specific ground motion hazard analysis.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 39 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Education/Training
BS, Civil Engineering,
California Polytechnic
State University, San Luis
Obispo, CA
Skills
Engineer‐in‐Training
(E.I.T.), No. 128476, CA
Nuclear Density Gauge
Michael Kibbey
Materials Testing Task Manager
Experience Summary
Mr. Kibbey has nearly 14 years of experience in materials testing and special inspection services involving pavement, masonry, pre‐cast concrete, earthwork, foundations, reinforcing steel, concrete, load testing of post‐installed anchors/dowels, structural steel, and welding, to name a few. His portfolio of projects includes experience with Caltrans, roadways/highways, bridges, rail, soil nail, tie‐back, and gravity walls, mass grading, deep and shallow foundations, hot mix asphalt pavements, and subsurface exploration. His responsibilities have included field activity oversight, planning and staffing, attendance at pre‐bid and pre‐construction meetings, owner and stakeholder reporting, analysis and communication, providing quality control leadership, including developing quality assurance protocols for laboratory testing, and ensuring contractor’s quality control programs are compliant with regulations and meet Agency and owner requirements.

Select Relevant Project Experience:

City of San Ramon
On‐Call Materials Testing and Construction Inspection Consulting Services, Project Manager
Mr. Kibbey serves as a Project Manager providing on‐call materials testing and construction inspection consulting services for the City of San Ramon through various task orders. Services include grading, paving, minor concrete work, installation and backfill of utilities, welding inspection, and full‐depth reclamation (FDR). All work is performed in accordance with Caltrans project special provision requirements and the City’s Quality Assurance Program (QAP).

City of San Ramon
Alcosta Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation, Project Manager This $3.5 million included the pavement rehabilitation along Alcosta Boulevard that included full‐depth reclamation (FDR) to stabilize existing subgrade with cement, overlay and mill and fill treatments with hot‐mix‐asphalt (HMA), HMA base failure repairs, utility adjustments, adjusting of survey monuments and covers, replacing signal detector loops, and pavement striping and markers. BSK provided materials testing services that included observation of base failure repairs, Quality Assurance (QA) oversight and testing during FDR cement treatment, HMA sampling and testing, and laboratory testing of FDR and HMA materials.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 40 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Michael Kibbey
Materials Testing
Task Manager
City of San Ramon
Pavement Management 2021 Project, Project Manager
BSK provided materials testing services on the City of San Ramon’s Pavement Management 2021 Project that included slurry seal treatment (90,408 SY), microsurfacing (180,710 SY), and rubber chip seal (121,545 SY) at various locations throughout the city as part of their annual maintenance program. BSK provided quality assurance observation and materials testing services that included sampling and testing of aggregates and emulsions through the duration of the project. BSK’s inspectors observed the contractor was performing operations per project specifications and measured the rate of placement of slurry seal/microsurfacing and chip seal. Laboratory testing included sieve analysis, sand equivalent, durability index, LA rattler, percent crushed particles, viscosity, particle charge, residue by evaporation, cone penetration, resilience, and softening point.

City of San Ramon
On‐Call Pothole and Miscellaneous Pavement Repairs, Project Manager
BSK provided materials testing and compaction testing services during this on‐call pothole repair project along Stoney Creek Drive in San Ramon. BSK observed and tested compaction for the base failure repairs using hot‐mix‐asphalt. Laboratory testing included Hveem maximum density, HMA oil content, and proctor compaction curves.

City of Richmond
Castro Ranch Road Rehabilitation Project, Project Manager Mr. Kibbey served as Project Manager providing Quality Assurance (QA) testing services as part of the Construction Management team for this pavement rehabilitation project of Castro Ranch Road from Olinda Road to the City Limit. Services include observation, sampling, and field density testing during subgrade preparation and placement of aggregate base, cold in‐place recycling of asphalt pavement, hot mix asphalt (HMA), as well as special inspection and testing services during reinforced concrete construction. All work was performed in accordance with Caltrans and project special provision requirements.

Contra Costa Transportation Authority
State Route 4 Balfour Road Interchange Reconstruction and Bridges, Project Manager and Structure Materials Representative (SMR) Mr. Kibbey served as Project Manager and Structure Materials Representative (SMR) on the Balfour Road and State Route 4 Interchange project in Brentwood. The project scope included City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 41 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Michael Kibbey
Materials Testing
Task Manager
lowering Balfour Road raising SR 4 to a primary precast (PC) pre‐ stressed (PS) concrete overpass bridge. Two other bridges were constructed over Deer Creek, PC/PS and Cast‐in‐place (CIP).  He oversaw the coordination of source inspections, working directly with the Structure Representative and with the Caltrans oversight team on the Balfour segment as well as helped develop the Source Inspection Quality Management Plan (SIQMP) that was prepared specifically for the project.

City of San Mateo
Construction Management (CM) On‐Call Materials Testing Services, Project Manager
Mr. Kibbey is serving as Project Manager to provide materials testing services as part of the City of San Mateo CM On‐Call. Services include performing compaction testing and observation of subgrade materials, full‐depth reclamation (FDR) testing, aggregate base, and hot‐mix‐ asphalt (HMA) paving, HMA batch plant sampling, as well as structural concrete sampling. Task orders to‐date include North San Mateo Drive Sustainable Streets, Citywide Street Rehabilitation Phase I, San Mateo Streets Reconstruction Project II.

Stanislaus County
Crows Landing Road Bridge Replacement, Project Manager
The proposed 5‐span structure will be a cast‐in‐place concrete box girder bridge and constructed in two‐stages to maintain two lanes of travel during construction. Mr. Kibbey is currently serving as Project Manager providing Quality Assurance (QA) testing services as part of the Construction Management team for the Crows Landing Road Bridge Replacement project over the San Joaquin River located near the unincorporated town of Crows Landing. The new bridge structure will have two 12‐foot travel lanes with 4‐foot shoulders, as well as a 12‐foot center median lane to accommodate safe turning movements.

BSK’s services include observation, sampling, and field density testing of native subgrade, embankment/structural backfill, and aggregate base, concrete sampling and testing, hot mix asphalt (HMA) sampling and testing, as well as to assist with source inspection coordination and testing. All work is being performed in accordance with Caltrans and project special provision requirements.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 42 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Mario Camorongan, PE, CFM, QSD
Senior Project Manager
Experience Summary
Mr. Camorongan is a seasoned civil engineer with over 40 years of experience in municipal engineering design. Prior to joining CSG, he served as Senior Civil Engineer/CIP Manager for the City of Concord.

Education/Training
Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering
University of Pangasinan
Philippines
Professional Civil Engineer
State of California | 32617
Professional Civil Engineer
State of Washington |
22052
Professional Civil Engineer
State of Oregon | 14657
Professional Civil Engineer
Philippines | 16996
Certified Floodplain
Manager, ASFPM
US‐08‐03613
Certified QSD/QSP
20442
Affiliations
Filipino‐American Society
of Architects and
Engineers (FASAE)
Past President 2004‐2005
Past Chairman of the
Board
Select Relevant Project Experience:

Mountain House Community Services District
Development Project Manager/Resident Engineer
Mr. Camorongan is providing project management and review of submittals. He provides project oversight as a Resident Engineer in support of the inspector on a number of parks and landscape projects such as A3 Mini Park, A4/A5 Mini Park, Neighborhood (NH) A, B2/B3, B4/B5 In‐Tract Landscaping projects.

City of Concord
Capital Improvement Program, Senior Civil Engineer/CIP Manager Mr. Camorongan worked in incremental responsibilities from a Public Works Engineer III to a Senior Civil Engineer/CIP Manager for the City of Concord. As a Senior Civil Engineer, Mr. Camorongan was responsible for managing the Capital Improvement Program of the Engineering Division and the delivery of capital projects through the preparation of plans and specifications and provided construction management. He prepared and reviewed project descriptions, outlined the scope of projects, design criteria, necessary information, special studies, and necessary scheduling and coordination, reviewed the work of engineering consultants for compliance with contracts, as well as responded to questions and complaints from contractors and the general public. Additionally, Mr. Camorongan was primarily responsible for the development of the City’s capital project budget and a designated Single Point of Contact (SPOC) to Caltrans, MTC, and CCTA.

City of Pleasant Hill
Luk and Associates, Project Manager
As Project Manager, Mr. Camorongan supervised staff assigned to each project. He prepared construction specifications and bid proposals for various projects and prepared grading and improvement plans for various schools, storage facilities, single family and multi‐ family subdivisions, fire department stations, animal shelters, juvenile justice facilities, shopping centers, and other commercial developments using AutoCad.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 43 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Mario Camorongan,

PE, CFM, QSD
Senior Project
Manager
Affiliations (continued)
Member Teaching Staff
(EIT Review)
American Public Works
Association (APWA)
City of Martinez
Engineering Collaborative, Vice President
Mr. Camorongan was responsible for the formulation and
administration of company policies and development of long‐range goals and objectives. He developed marketing plans and interacted with clients, developed strategies for personal and professional growth of employees, and provided plan checking of grading and improvement plans, parcel and final maps, and related documents for various cities.

City of Walnut Creek
Stedman and Associates, Engineering Supervisor
Mr. Camorongan planned, developed, coordinated, and directed large engineering projects, as well as small projects with many complex features. He developed and evaluated plans and criteria for the variety of projects and activities carried out by subordinates. Mr. Camorongan also performed structural calculations, hydrology and hydraulic calculations, engineer’s cost estimates, and earthwork quantities.

City of Concord
Santina and Thompson, Project Engineer
As a Project Engineer, Mr. Camorongan performed structural analysis on concrete retaining walls, sound walls, slope protection structures, and bridge widening projects. He designed grading, utility, and improvement plans for various subdivisions, included designed various capital improvement projects for various types of construction specifications for the City of Dublin.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 44 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Education/Training
Bachelor of Science in Civil
Engineering
California Polytechnic
State University
Lawrence Lau, PE, PLS, QSD/P
CIP Manager
Experience Summary
Mr. Lau has over 27 years of civil engineering design and project management experience. He possesses a strong technical background in the master planning, design, and construction of Caltrans and local roadways, complete streets, roundabouts, parking lots, drainage and utility improvements for public agencies. He is also experienced in site layout, grading, drainage, and backbone infrastructure improvements for low, medium, and high density residential and mixed‐use developments.

Professional Civil Engineer
State of California |
C57397
Professional Land
Surveyor
State of California | L7934
Qualified Stormwater
Designer/Practitioner |
23449
Affiliations
APWA
American Council of
Engineering Companies
East Bay Chapter
Past President (2013‐
2014)
American Society of Civil
Engineers
Select Relevant Project Experience:

City of East Palo Alto
Addison Ave. Safe Routes to Schools and Green Street Improvements, Project Manager
Mr. Lau served as the Project Manager for enhancements to pedestrian and bicyclist accessibility and safety within a residential area by installing new bicycle and pedestrian facilities and sustainable green street features. Mr. Lau led a community outreach meeting at the beginning of design stage to listen to the community and stakeholder’s concerns.

Town of Colma
Mission Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Project, Project Manager
Mr. Lau served as the Project Manager for the design of bicycle and pedestrian improvements in the Town of Colma. The project involved the planning, design and implementation of a number of safety related improvements for the pedestrians, bicyclists and vehicles along Mission Road between El Camino Real and Lawndale Boulevard.

The anticipated improvements include addition of new sidewalk to provide continuous safe and accessible pedestrian route, extension of Class II bicycle lanes on northbound direction, construction of bulbouts and high visibility crosswalks with pedestrian flashing beacons, installation of energy efficient street lights, relocation and reconstruction of the existing curb, gutter, sidewalk and non‐ADA compliant ramps and driveway approaches, and construction of landscape planters for drainage and stormwater treatment purposes City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 45 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Lawrence Lau, PE,

PLS, QDS/P
CIP Manager
City of Pleasanton
Bernal Ave. and Nevada Street Intersection Project, Project Manager Mr. Lau managed the design of a protected intersection, an innovative approach to expand both the northwest and southwest corners of the intersection of Bernal Avenue and Nevada Street with a 30 feet radius and ADA‐compliant curb ramps. The design aspects of the project included ADA‐compliant curb ramps, driveway approach, sidewalk, curb & gutter, a drainage inlet, adjustment to utility covers, roadway resurfacing, and modification to an existing drainage inlet.

City of Albany
Marin Ave. Pavement & Curb Rehabilitation Project, Project Manager Mr. Lau managed the review, evaluation, recommendation, and design of pavement rehabilitation treatment alternatives along Marin Avenue and other eleven collector and local roads for the City. The project scope included assessment of existing site conditions, selection of pavement treatment types, repair of base failures, crack sealing, pavement patch and leveling, preservation of existing survey monuments, reconstruction of curb ramps to meet ADA requirements, repair of failed curb, gutter and sidewalk, reinstallation of new bike lanes and traffic signal detector loops, pavement markings and striping, and adjustment of existing utilities to pavement finished grade. Mr. Lau also attended a workshop to present the findings from the field investigations and establish guiding principles for curb ramp design, pavement treatments and modifications to existing striping and signage.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 46 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Education/Training
Bachelor of Science,
Industrial Technology
Construction Option with
Architectural Emphasis
California State University
Professional Civil Engineer
State of California |
C57601
David Rubcic, PE, PLS
City Surveyor
Experience Summary
Mr. Rubcic is a professional engineer with over 36 years of experience in all phases of municipal engineering including capital improvement projects, subdivision improvements, land developments, inspection, and master planning. Prior to joining CSG, Mr. Rubcic served the City of Hollister for 22 years, starting as an Assistant Engineer and ending his services as Interim City Engineer. As part of his role with the City of Hollister, Mr. Rubcic met with the public in workshops and other meetings including one‐on‐one discussions for negotiations of right‐of‐ way acquisition, project meetings, and general community outreach.

For CSG, Mr. Rubcic provided map review for developments for the Town of Windsor, Mountain View, Monte Sereno, San Leandro, and many other agencies in the area. He also performs development review for the City of Rohnert Park as part of an on‐call development and map review contract.

Professional Land
Surveyor
State of California | L7994
Select Relevant Project Experience:

City of Marina
Development and Map Review, Project Manager
Mr. Rubcic serves as CSG’s Project Manager overseeing the review of multiple developments within the City. Notable projects include but are not limited to: Sea Haven/Marina Heights Development‐ 240‐acre site will include over 1,000 new townhouse and single‐family residential units, and will include 35 acres of parks, greenbelts, and open space. The Dunes Residential Development‐ multiple phased of development. His responsibilities have included the review of Final Maps and the associated improvement plans for each phase. He has also performed several Tentative Map conformance reviews and a Tentative Map amendment review. Marina Station‐ 246.2 Acres consisting of 1360 residential units, commercial, industrial, office, parks, trails. He has already preformed a Tentative Map Conformance Review and participates in project meetings with the developer.

City of Gilroy
Project Manager, City Surveyor
Mr. Rubcic currently serves as the CSG Project Manager and the City Surveyor where he has reviewed several Lot Line Adjustments, easements, certificate of compliance proposals and a Project Review for the compliance with existing maps on difficult properties involving a Court Judgment.  He is currently reviewing a 67 Lot residential subdivision as part of the Glen Loma master planned Development.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 47 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Suzanne Avilla, AICP
Principal Planner
Experience Summary
Ms. Avila is a planning professional with over 30 years of experience in municipal planning.

Experience
30 years
Education/Training
Bachelor of Arts,
Environmental Studies
California State University,
East Bay | Hayward, CA
Graduate Coursework
Environmental
Studies/Urban Planning
San Jose State University |
San Jose, CA
Affiliations
American Institute of
Certified Planners
Select Relevant Project Experience:

Town of Los Altos Hills
CSG Contract Planner
Ms. Avila provided project management services to the Town of Los Altos Hills on Pathway Fee Nexus Study, Pathway Map update and Green Infrastructure Plan.

Town of Colma
CSG Contract Planner
Ms. Avila provides planning manager staff augmentation for current and long‐range planning initiatives.

Town of Portola Valley
CSG Contract Planner
Ms. Avila is currently providing housing policy and current planning assistance to the Town.

Town of Altos Hills
Planning Director
As Planning Director, Ms. Avila oversaw and managed Planning and Building operations and code enforcement; supervised staff and consultants and prepared performance reviews; reviewed and rendered decisions on projects at Site Development and Fast Track hearings; prepared reports and presentations and attended all Planning Commission and City Council meetings. She also met with residents and design professionals to facilitate application processing and to resolve issues, interfaced with volunteer committee members, prepared ordinance and General Plan element updates, reviewed and processed annexations and development applications, and conducted building permit plan checks.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 48 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Suzanne Avila, AICP
Principal Planner
Town of Los Gatos
Senior Planner
Ms. Avila performed current planning functions as the project planner for complex planning applications including planned developments, architecture and site, subdivisions and use permits; hillside development; and historic preservation (CLG Coordinator and staff liaison). She also processed annexations, performed construction management and building plan check, prepared staff reports, and held site analysis meetings with design professionals and residents.

Her advance planning responsibilities included General Plan and Housing Element updates, Tree Protection Ordinance updates, creation and adoption of Commercial Design Guidelines and Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines, establishment of architectural and geotechnical peer review processes, preparation of consultant RFPs and contracts, managing Environmental, Arborist and Architectural consultants, consultant selection, and community workshops for the North 40 Specific Plan.

City of Palo Alto
Contract Planner
For the City of Palo Alto, Ms. Avila was responsible for commercial and industrial projects requiring approval by Architectural Review Board, Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission; environmental review; site visits and field work; building permit plan check; and pre‐ application meetings with design professionals and business owners.

City of Sunnyvale
Contract Planner
For the City of Sunnyvale, Ms. Avila worked at the One‐Stop Permit counter as part of the express plan check team; provided zoning information; reviewed business license and home occupation applications; processed staff level planning and design review applications; updated brochures and informational handouts; served as project planner for commercial and industrial projects; performed environmental review; and worked on annexation of County pockets.

Town of Altos Hills, Associate Planner
Ms. Avila performed site analysis meetings with residents and design professionals; reviewed development, subdivision, variance, conditional development permit and conditional use permit applications; prepared staff reports to Planning Commission and City Council; and attended Site Development, Planning Commission and City Council meetings.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 49 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Education/Training
California State University
Northridge, Master’s in
Public Administration
(Public Sector
Management)
San Diego State
University, Business
Administration (Finance)
Affiliations
California Society of
Municipal Finance Officers
(CSMFO)
Municipal Management
Association of Southern
California (MMASC)
Brian M. Brown, MPA
Principal
Experience Summary
Mr. Brown has over 15 years of experience in the formation and administration of Special Financing Districts in the state of California.

Prior to joining Francisco & Associates, Brian was a Director of Public Finance at Harris & Associates and an Associate Director at NBS where he worked with public agencies throughout the State of California in addressing their revenue needs.  Brian has successfully developed financial and managerial solutions to help municipalities better manage their special financing districts.  He has formed and administered special financing districts formed under a variety of California statutes, including, but not limited to the Mello‐Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Improvement Act of 1913, Municipal Bond Act of 1915, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, and Benefit Assessment District Act of 1982. Mr. Brown is responsible for performing various tasks pertaining to all aspects of the formation and administration of Special Financing Districts.  These duties include creating and implementing financing strategies, developing tax and assessment methodologies, audits, the creation and development of budgets, district and project fund closeouts, initial bond disclosure analysis, annual administration services, continuing disclosure services, statutory compliance, preparation of reports, data manipulation, council presentations, community outreach, and management of the databases associated with the special financing districts.

Committee on
Assessments, Special
Taxes, & Other Financing
Facilities (CASTOFF)
Select Relevant Project Experience:

Maintenance Assessment Districts
 City of Brentwood, CA, Landscape and Lighting Districts (60+ separate districts)
 City of Brentwood, CA, Citywide Park Assessment District  Carmel Valley Recreation & Park District, CA, Park Maintenance Assessment District
 City of Chula Vista, CA*, Open Space Districts (30+ separate districts and zones)
 City of Campbell, CA, Lighting and Landscaping District LLA‐1  City of Concord, CA, Citywide Street Lighting District  City of Concord, CA, Landscape and Lighting District No. 3, Pine Hollow, and Downtown
 Cordova Recreation & Park District, Landscape and Lighting/Park  City of Dublin, CA, Street Light/Landscape and Lighting Districts City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 50 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Brian Brown, MPA
Principal
 City of Elk Grove, CA*, Street/Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (2 districts)
 City of Lincoln, CA*, Benefit Assessment District No. 1  City of Livermore, CA, Landscape and Lighting Districts (90 + separate districts)
 City of Maywood, CA, Street Lighting Assessment District  City of National City*, CA, Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 (Mile of Cars)
 City of Oakland, CA, Citywide Landscape and Lighting District  City of Oxnard, CA*, SFD Audits (50+ districts)
 City of Rancho Cordova, CA, Landscape & Lighting/Transit Districts (4 districts)
 City of Solvang, CA, Landscape & Lighting Maintenance District No. 2004‐1
 Southgate Recreation & Park District, Landscape and Lighting Districts (multiple districts and zones)
Mello‐Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982
 Association of Bay Area Governments*, Windemere CFD No. 2004‐ 2  City of Brentwood, CA, CFD No. 2, 3, 4 & 5
 City of Campbell, CA, Community Facilities District No. 2  City of Chula Vista, CA*, Community Facilities Districts (25+ separate districts)
 City of Clayton*, CA, CFD No. 1990‐1, 1990‐2, 2006‐1, and 2007‐1  Cordova Recreation & Park District, Community Facilities Districts (5 districts)
 Contra Costa County, CA, Administration of CFDs
 City of Elk Grove, CA*, CFD No. 2002‐1, 2003‐1, 2003‐2, 2005‐1, and 2006‐1
 City of Laguna Beach, CA*, Utility Undergrounding CFD Study  City of Lincoln, CA*, Community Facilities District No. 1998‐1 (Lincoln Airpark)
 City of Livermore, CA, Administration and Formation of CFDs  City of Napa, CA, Community Facilities District No. 2017‐1  City of Oakland, CA, Wood Street and Gateway Industrial CFDs  City of Rancho Cordova, CA*, Administration and Formation of CFDs
 City of San Ramon, CA, CFD No. 2014‐1
 Southgate Recreation & Park District, Community Facilities District Districts (2 CFDs)
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 51 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Brian Brown, MPA
Principal
Special Tax Districts
 City of Dublin, CA, Emergency Medical Services Special Tax  City of Lincoln, CA*, Community Facilities District No. 1998‐1  City of Oakland, CA, Special Taxes (7 special taxes)
 City of Rancho Cordova, CA, Police Services Special Tax 1913/1915 Act Assessment Districts
 Association of Bay Area Governments*, Windemere Ranch Assessment District
 City of Anderson, CA, Riverside Avenue East Assessment District  City of Antioch, CA*, Assessment Districts (4 districts)  City of Brentwood, CA, Assessment Districts (10 separate districts)  City of Carlsbad, CA*, Assessment Districts (multiple districts)  City of Chula Vista, CA*, Assessment Districts (5+ separate districts)
 City of Hercules, CA*, Assessment District No. 2005‐1 (John Muir) and (Alfred Nobel)
 City of Lincoln, CA*, Twelve Bridges Assessment District No. 1995‐ 1 (Series 1999‐1 and 2001‐1) and Foskett Ranch Assessment District No. 2004‐2
 City of Merced, CA, Fahrens Park Assessment District
 County of San Diego, CA*, Assessment District No. 4‐S  Hidden Valley Lakes Community Services District, CA*, (multiple districts)
 Lower Lake County Water District, CA*, Assessment District No. 1 City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 52 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Education/Training
San Diego State
University, B.S.C.E., Civil
Engineering
Professional Engineer,
California, No. 40688
Professional Engineer,
Nevada, No. 12316
Affiliations
APWA
American Society of Civil
Engineers
Municipal Management
Assistants of Northern
California
Joe Francisco, PE
Principal
Experience Summary
Mr. Francisco founded Francisco and Associates in 2000 and has served as Principal since the company was established. Mr. Francisco is a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California and will be your Quality Control Engineer responsible for reviewing all aspects of your project.  Mr. Francisco has more than thirty‐five (35) years of professional Public Financing and Assessment Engineering experience.

He has served as Project Manager, Quality Control Engineer, and Technical Advisor for the formation and administration of over 150 Special Financing Districts pursuant to the Landscape & Lighting Act of 1972, 1913 Municipal Improvement Act, Mello‐Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Fire Suppression District Act, Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Property and Business Improvement Law of 1994, and Special Fee and Tax Districts.  His experience also extends to the State of Nevada, having formed special financing districts under the authority of the Nevada Revised Statues. Mr. Francisco is extremely familiar with all the requirements of forming and administering Landscape & Lighting Assessment Districts.  He has prepared numerous benefit spread methodologies, Engineer’s Reports, Proposition 218 compliance reviews, conducted Proposition 218 elections, prepared and mailed required legal notices and ballots, etc.

Prior to forming Francisco & Associates, Mr. Francisco was the Public Financing Chairman for the City of San Diego, responsible for the formation and administration of all their special financing districts.

This position required coordination between the City Attorney, City Auditor, City Engineer, Finance Director, and the City Treasurer along with outside Financial Advisors, Legal Counsels, Bond Underwriters, Developers and Property Owners.  After working for the City of San Diego for twelve (12) years, Mr. Francisco joined Willdan Associates (which acquired Muni‐Financial, a Financial Services Firm) in Southern California as their Southern California Assessment Engineer. Two (2) years later, he joined Berryman & Henigar’s Management & Finance Division and worked with them for over seven (7) years. His last position at Berryman & Henigar was Vice President in charge of the Northern California Management & Finance Division, responsible for the formation and administration of their special financing districts.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 53 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Joe Francisco, PE
Principal
Select Relevant Project Experience:

The following includes a partial listing of financing district projects Mr.

Francisco has worked on during his career.

Acquisition Audits
 City of Davis, CA, Mace Ranch CFD, Clark County, NV, Various Special Improvement District
 County of Orange, CA, Rancho Santa Margarita CFD Series B  County of Orange, CA, Rancho Santa Margarita CFD Series E Assessment Districts Confirmed per Article XIIID of the California State Constitution (Proposition 218)
 Ambrose Recreation and Park District, CA, Districtwide Landscape Maint. Dist.
 City of Antioch, CA, Street Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Districts
 City of Brentwood, CA, Brentwood Landscape and Lighting Districts (60+ Dist.)
 City of Clovis, CA, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1  City of Concord, CA, Citywide Street Lighting District  City of Concord, CA, Downtown Landscape Maintenance District  City of Concord, CA, Pine Hollow Landscape Maintenance District,  Contra Costa County, CA, Landscape and Lighting District No. (LL‐ 2),
 Town of Danville, CA, Citywide Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1983‐1
 City of Encinitas, CA, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1  Fairfield‐Suisun Sewer District, CA, Sewer Service Charge  City of Hayward, CA, Maintenance District No. 1 & 2
 City of Hayward, CA, Landscape Maintenance District
 City of Livermore, CA, Downtown Maintenance District
 City of Novato, CA, Eucalyptus Avenue Assessment District  City of Oakland, CA, Wildfire Prevention Assessment District  City of Rohnert Park, CA, Citywide Fire Suppression District, ‐Santa Clara County, CA, County Lighting Service Area Assessment District  City of Solvang, CA, Solvang Mesa Landscape & Lighting District No. 2004‐1
 City of Sunnyvale, CA, Downtown Parking Assessment District  City of Sunnyvale, CA, Conway Road Assessment District Benefit Assessment Act of 1982
 City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA, Benefit Assessment District 90‐1  City of Vista, CA, Street Maintenance District
 City of Clovis, CA, Benefit Assessment District No. 95‐1  City of Lincoln, CA, Benefit Assessment District No. 1 City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 54 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Joe Francisco, PE
Principal
Cost Reimbursement Districts
 City of San Diego, CA, International Business Center Cost Reimb.

District
 City of San Diego, CA, Mesa Shopping Center Cost Reimbursement District
Fee Districts
 City of Brentwood, CA, Sewer Standby Charge
 City of Brentwood, CA, Water Standby Charge
 City of Concord, CA, Sewer Service Charge
 Fairfield‐Suisun Sewer District, CA, Sewer Service Charge  City of Livermore, CA, Sewer Service Charge
 City of Norwalk, CA, Sewer Service Charge
 City of Oakland, CA, Sewer Service Charge
Fire Suppression Districts
 City of Oakland, CA, Wildfire Prevention Assessment District  City of Rohnert Park, CA, Citywide Fire Suppression District Geological Hazard Abatement Districts
 Canyon Lakes Geological Hazard Abatement District
 Hillcrest Heights Geological Hazard Abatement District  Leona Quarry Geological Hazard Abatement District
 Oakland Area Geological Hazard Abatement District
 SW Pittsburg Geological Hazard Abatement District
 Weidemann Ranch Geological Hazard Abatement District
 Wendt Ranch Geological Hazard Abatement District
Maintenance Assessment Districts
 City of Alhambra, CA, Citywide Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District
 Ambrose Recreation and Park District, CA, Landscape Maintenance District
 City of Antioch, CA, Street Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Districts
 Arden Manor Recreation and Park District, CA, Districtwide Landscape Maintenance District
 City of Brentwood, CA, Landscape and Lighting Districts (60+ districts)
 City of Brentwood, CA, Citywide Park Assessment District, ‐City of Clovis, CA, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
 City of Concord, CA, Citywide Street Lighting District  City of Concord, CA, Downtown Landscape Maintenance District  City of Concord, CA, Landscape and Lighting District No. 3 City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 55 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Joe Francisco, PE
Principal
 City of Concord, CA, Pine Hollow Estates Landscape and Lighting District
 Contra Costa County, CA, Landscape and Lighting District No. (LL‐2)  Town of Danville, CA, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1983‐1
 East Bay Regional Park District, CA, Districtwide Landscape Maint.

District
 City of Oakley, CA, Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District No. 1
 Ortega Trails Recreation and Park District, CA, Wildomar Assessment District No. 68‐4632 & No. 68‐4633
 City of Sacramento, CA, Additional Library Services No. 96‐2  Santa Clara Open Space Authority, CA, Open Space Assessment District
 Santa Clara County, CA, County Lighting Service Area
 City of Santa Fe Springs, CA, Citywide Lighting and Landscape Maint. District
 City of Seal Beach, CA, Citywide Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District
 City of Solvang, CA, Solvang Mesa Landscape Maintenance District  City of Sunnyvale, CA, Downtown Parking Assessment District  City of Vista, CA, La Mirada Canyon Landscape Maintenance District
 City of Vista, CA, Special Lighting Assessment District No. 1 Mello‐Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982
 City of Brentwood, CA, CFD No. 2, 3, 4 & 5
 City of Campbell, CA, CFD No. 2
 City of Clayton, CA, CFD No. 1
 Contra Costa County, CA, CFD Nos. 2006‐1, 2008‐1 and 2010‐1  Cordova Recreation & Park District, CA, CFD Nos. 01‐1, 04‐1, 14‐1, 16‐1, 16‐2
 Town of Danville, CA, CFD No. 97‐1
 City of Davis, CA, Mace Ranch CFD ,‐
 City of Desert Hot Springs, CA, Public Safety CFD 93‐1  City of Hercules, CA, CFD No. 2017‐1
 City of Huntington Beach, CA, Ellis‐Goldenwest CFD 1990‐1  City of Lincoln, CA, CFD Nos. 2004‐1, 2004‐1, 2016‐1
 City of Livermore, CA, CFD Nos. 2012‐1, 2015‐1, 2016‐1  City of Napa, CA, CFD No. 2017‐1
 City of Oakland, CA, Rockridge CFD
 City of Oakley, CA, CFD Nos. 1 (Cyprus Grove), 2005‐1, and 2015‐2, ‐County of Orange, CA, CFD 87‐5B, Rancho Santa Margarita  County of Orange, CA, CFD 87‐5E, Rancho Santa Margarita City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 56 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Joe Francisco, PE
Principle
 City of San Diego, CA, Miramar Ranch North CFD 90‐1
 City of San Jose, CA, North Coyote Valley CFD No. 5
 City of San Jose, CA, Great Oaks – Route 85 CFD No. 6  City of San Ramon, CA, CFD No. 2014‐1
 City of Sunnyvale, CA, CFD No. 1 and 3
 City of Victorville, CA, Western Addition CFD 90‐1
 City of Vista, CA, Hacienda Drive and Buena Vista Creek CFD 90‐2  City of Vista, CA, North County Square CFD 92‐1
Mosquito and Vector Abatement Districts
 Contra Costa County Mosquito and Vector Control Assessment District, CA
 Santa Clara County Mosquito and Vector Control Assessment District, CA
 Shasta County Mosquito and Vector Control Assessment District, CA
Municipal Improvement Act of 1913
 City of Anderson, CA, Riverside Avenue East Assessment District  City of Brentwood, CA, Assessment Districts (11 separate districts)  City of Chula Vista, CA, Assessment Districts (10 separate districts)  City of Desert Hot Springs, CA, Arroyo Vista Assessment District No. 92‐1
 City of Desert Hot Springs, CA, Arroyo Vista Assessment District No. 93‐2
 City of Desert Hot Springs, CA, Two Bunch Palms Trail Assessment District 91‐1
 City of Lake Elsinore, CA, Assessment Districts 86‐1, 90‐1 and 93‐1,  City of Long Beach, CA, Downtown Transportation Assessment District, City of Newark, CA, AD Nos. 26, 30, 31, 32, 33, and 34, ‐ City of Merced, CA, 16th Street Assessment District
 City of Merced, CA, Liberty Park and Fahrens Assessment Districts  City of Merced, CA, North Merced Sewer Improvement District  City of Newark, CA, Assessment Districts (8 separate districts)  City of Novato, CA, Eucalyptus Avenue Assessment District  County of Orange, CA, Irvine Coast Assessment District No. 88‐1  City of San Clemente, CA, Lane Forester Ranch No. 98‐1  City of San Clemente, CA, Undergrounding Utility District  City of San Diego, CA, International Business Center Assessment District
 City of San Diego, CA, Mission Valley Heights Assessment District  City of San Diego, CA, Black Mountain Road Assessment District  City of Sunnyvale, CA, Conway Road Assessment District City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 57 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Joe Francisco, PE
Principle
 San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency, CA, Flood Protection Restoration Assessment District No. 96‐1
 City of Vista, CA, Huff and Date Street Assessment District No. 86‐2  City of Vista, CA, Oceanside Blvd., and Melrose Drive Improvement District No. 80‐2R
 City of Vista, CA, Raceway Basin Assessment District No. 86‐1  City of Vista, CA, Sycamore Industrial Park Assessment District No. 81‐2R
Special Tax Districts
 Acalanes Unified High School District, CA, School Parcel Tax  Hayward Area Recreation and Park District, CA, Park Special Tax, Knightsen Town Community Services District, CA, Flood Control Special Tax
 City of Livermore, CA, Livermore Emergency Medical Services Tax  City of Livermore, CA, Storm Water Tax
 Livermore Area Recreation & Park District, CA, Livermore Special Tax District 97‐1
 Livermore Joint Unified School District, CA, School Parcel Tax  City of Newark, CA, Citywide Emergency Medical Services Tax  Novato Unified School District, CA, School Parcel Tax  City of Oakland, CA, Citywide Library Tax
 City of Oakland, CA, Oakland Emergency Medical Services Tax  City of Oakland, CA, Oakland Paramedic Services Tax
 City of San Jose, CA, Citywide Library Services Tax
 San Ramon Valley Unified School District, CA, School Parcel Tax City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 58 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Education/Training
University of Florida,
B.S.C.E., Civil Engineering
Graduated 2007
Affiliations
American Society of Civil
Engineers
American Public Works
Association
Municipal Management
Assistants of Northern
California
Committee on
Assessments, Special
Taxes, & Other Financing
Facilities (CASTOFF)
Eduardo Espinoza, PE
Principal‐in‐Charge/Assessment Engineer
Experience Summary
Prior to joining Francisco & Associates, Eduardo was a Project Engineer for Kimley‐Horn and Associates, Inc. and worked on public and private sector projects including the preparation and analysis associated with due diligence reports for commercial and residential development, Flood Control and Water Quality Improvements, Roadway
Improvements, Watershed Management Plans, and Environmental Impact Studies.  Eduardo was responsible for civil improvements design including plan preparation and was a point of contact with clients and contractors. Eduardo also has extensive experience in the use of GIS and its various applications.  This experience includes shapefile and geodatabase creation and manipulation for all aspects of mapping and layer management. At Francisco and Associates, Eduardo has served as Project Manager and Quality Control Engineer for the formation and administration of over 100 Special Financing Districts pursuant to the 1913 Municipal Improvement Act, Landscape & Lighting Act of 1972, Mello‐Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, and Special Fee and Tax Districts.

Eduardo is responsible for performing various tasks pertaining to all aspects of the formation and administration of Public Finance Districts.

These duties include implementing and creating benefit assessment methodologies, preparation of Engineer’s Reports, Council and Board presentations, community outreach meetings, design of factual informational brochures, GIS mapping and data manipulation, and creation and administration of the databases associated with the assessments and special taxes. Mr. Espinoza is extremely familiar with the requirements pertaining to the formation and administration of the various Financing Districts used throughout California.  He has served as Quality Control Engineer and Project Manager responsible for the preparation of Engineer’s Reports, Proposition 218 Compliance, Special Tax Formulas, Continuing Disclosure Reports, CDIAC Reports, R&T 163 Reports, Assessment District Segregations, Delinquency Administration, GIS Maps, Assessment Diagrams, etc.

Select Relevant Project Experience:

Assessment Districts Confirmed per Article XIIID of the California State Constitution (Proposition 218)
 City of Brentwood, CA, Brentwood Landscape and Lighting Districts (60+ Dist.)
 City of Clovis, CA, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 59 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Eduardo Espinoza,
PE
Principal‐in‐
Charge/Assessment
Engineer
 City of Concord, CA, Citywide Street Lighting District  City of Concord, CA, Downtown Landscape Maintenance District  City of Concord, CA, Pine Hollow Landscape Maintenance District  Town of Danville, CA, Citywide Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1983‐1
 City of Hayward, CA, Maintenance District No. 1 & 2
 City of Hayward, CA, Landscape Maintenance District
 Santa Clara County, CA, County Lighting Service Area Assessment District
 City of Solvang, CA, Solvang Mesa Landscape & Lighting District No. 2004‐1
 City of Sunnyvale, CA, Downtown Parking Assessment District  City of Sunnyvale, CA, Conway Road Assessment District Benefit Assessment Act of 1982
 City of Clovis, CA, Benefit Assessment District No. 95‐1  City of Lincoln, CA, Benefit Assessment District No. 1 Fee Districts
 City of Brentwood, CA, Sewer Standby Charge
 City of Brentwood, CA, Water Standby Charge
 City of Concord, CA, Sewer Service Charge
 City of Livermore, CA, Sewer Service Charge
 City of Norwalk, CA, Sewer Service Charge
Geological Hazard Abatement Districts
 Canyon Lakes Geological Hazard Abatement District
 Hillcrest Heights Geological Hazard Abatement District  Leona Quarry Geological Hazard Abatement District
 Oakland Area Geological Hazard Abatement District
 SW Pittsburg Geological Hazard Abatement District
 Weidemann Ranch Geological Hazard Abatement District
 Wendt Ranch Geological Hazard Abatement District
Maintenance Assessment Districts
 City of Brentwood, CA, Landscape and Lighting Districts (60+ districts)
 City of Brentwood, CA, Citywide Park Assessment District  City of Clovis, CA, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1  City of Concord, CA, Citywide Street Lighting District  City of Concord, CA, Downtown Landscape Maintenance District  City of Concord, CA, Landscape and Lighting District No. 3  City of Concord, CA, Pine Hollow Estates Landscape and Lighting District
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 60 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Eduardo Espinoza,
PE
Principal‐in‐
Charge/Assessment
Engineer
 Town of Danville, CA, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1983‐1
 City of Hercules, Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts (5 districts)
Mello‐Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982
 City of Brentwood, CA, CFD No. 2, 3, 4 & 5
 City of Campbell, CA, CFD No. 2
 Contra Costa County, CA, CFD Nos. 2006‐1, 2008‐1 and 2010‐1  Cordova Recreation & Park District, CA, CFD Nos. 01‐1, 04‐1, 14‐1, 16‐1, 16‐2
 City of Hercules, CA, CFD No. 2017‐1
 City of Lincoln, CA, CFD Nos. 2004‐1, 2004‐1, 2018‐1, and 2018‐2  City of Napa, CA, CFD No. 2017‐1
 City of Oakland, CA, Rockridge CFD
 City of Oakley, CA, CFD Nos. 1 (Cyprus Grove), 2005‐1, and 2015‐2  City of San Ramon, CA, CFD No. 2014‐1
 City of Sunnyvale, CA, CFD No. 1 and 3
Mosquito and Vector Abatement Districts
 Contra Costa County Mosquito and Vector Control Assessment District, CA
Municipal Improvement Act of 1913
 City of Anderson, CA, Riverside Avenue East Assessment District  City of Brentwood, CA, Assessment Districts (11 separate districts)  City of Lake Elsinore, CA, Assessment Districts 86‐1, 90‐1 and 93‐1  City of Newark, CA, AD Nos. 26, 30, 31, 32, 33, and 34  City of Merced, CA, 16th Street Assessment District
 City of Merced, CA, Liberty Park Assessment District
 City of Merced, CA, North Merced Sewer Improvement District  City of Merced, CA, Fahrens Park Assessment District
 City of Newark, CA, Assessment Districts (8 separate districts) Special Tax Districts
 Alameda County, County Emergency Medical Services Tax  Hayward Area Recreation and Park District, CA, Park Special Tax  Knightsen Town Community Services District, CA, Flood Control Special Tax
 City of Livermore, CA, Livermore Emergency Medical Services Tax  City of Livermore, CA, Storm Water Tax
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 61 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Eduardo Espinoza,
PE
Principal‐in‐
Charge/Assessment
Engineer
 Livermore Area Recreation & Park District, CA, Livermore Special Tax District 97‐1
 City of Newark, CA, Citywide Emergency Medical Services Tax  City of Oakland, CA, Citywide Library Tax
 City of Oakland, CA, Oakland Emergency Medical Services Tax  City of Oakland, CA, Oakland Paramedic Services Tax
 City of Oakley, CA, Polices Services Tax
 City of San Jose, CA, Citywide Library Services Tax
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 62 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Appendix b – Cost of Services (continued from Section 2h) Below is AnchorCM’s 2022 Fee Schedule (anticipate 3% increase after December 31, 2022):

Principal
Forensic Engineer/Expert Witness $ 357.00
Principal Consultant $ 326.00
Principal‐in‐Charge $ 272.00
Engineer/Manager
Project Principal Engineer/CM $ 239.00
Senior Engineer/CM $ 217.00
Associate Engineer/CM $ 191.00
Staff Engineer/CM Level 4 (PE or equivalent) $ 175.00
Staff Engineer/CM Level 3 (PE or equivalent) $ 162.00
Staff Engineer/CM Level 2 (EIT or equivalent) $ 140.00
Staff Engineer/Deputy CM Level 1 $ 115.00
Junior Engineer/Assistant CM $ 110.00
Engineering Technician
Senior Engineering Technician $ 156.00
Mid Engineering Technician $ 122.00
Engineering Technician $ 98.00
Inspector
Construction Representative / Senior Inspector $ 165.00 Prevailing Wage Building / Construction Inspector $ 150.00 Prevailing Wage Soils / AC Inspector $ 150.00
Project Administrative Staff
Senior Contract Administrator $ 156.00
Bookkeeper $ 156.00
Contract Administrator $ 108.00
Contract Administration Assistant $ 74.00
Notes:

1. Field vehicleswill be billed at $1,700/month; cell phone and mobile broadband servicebilled at $90/mo.

2. Other direct costs(ODCs) and subconsultant fees are billed separately at ACM cost plus 10%.

3. Four‐ and eight‐hour minimums apply for cancellations,tasksrequiring travel, and legal appearances.

4. Contract projectstaffwillbebilled atthe contractrateforlegalwork and appearances,with yearlyescalation applied.

5. Inspector rates may vary due to prevailing wage requirements and determinations of the California Department of Industrial Relations and/or the Department of Labor.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 63 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
AMG Billing Rate Table:

Title Hourly Billing Rate Range
Associate Engineer $ 160.00 – 195.00
Communications Marketing Manager $ 145.00 ‐ 160.00
Engineering Technician $ 100.00 – 110.00
President $ 310.00
Principal $ 230.00 ‐ 280.00
Project Administrator $ 100.00 – 155.00
Project Controls Manager $ 190.00 ‐ 240.00
Project Controls Specialist $ 145.00 – 160.00
Project Coordinator $ 110.00 – 155.00
Project Manager $ 155.00 ‐ 210.00
Senior Consultant $ 250.00 ‐ 285.00
Senior Engineer $ 150.00 – 160.00
Senior Project Analyst $ 150.00 ‐ 165.00
Smart Cities Specialist $ 135.00 ‐ 150.00
Technology Manager $ 185.00 ‐ 195.00
Transit Planner $ 145.00 ‐ 165.00
Vice President $ 230.00 ‐ 280.00
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 64 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
CSG Billing Rate Table:

Professional Engineering Services 2022 Hourly Billing Rate Engineering Trainee $ 70.00
Administrative Assistant $ 80.00
Analyst $ 135.00
Engineering Designer/CASp Inspection & Consultation $ 145.00 Construction Inspector $ 150.00
Senior Analyst $ 160.00
Assistant Resident Engineer $ 175.00
Assistant Engineer $ 150.00
Associate Engineer $ 180.00
Senior Construction Inspector $ 165.00
Senior Engineer $ 205.00
Senior Land Surveyor $ 205.00
Resident Engineer $ 210.00
Structure Representative $ 210 .00
Senior Structural Engineer $ 225.00
Senior Project Manager $ 225.00
Principal Engineer $ 240.00
Senior Principal Engineer $ 260 .00
Two‐Person Survey Crew $ 340.00
Sustainability Program Management Services Hourly Rate
Sustainability Program Analyst $ 140.00
Sustainability Program Senior Analyst   $ 165.00
Sustainability Program Manager $ 195.00
Escalation: The prices noted above are subject to an increase of 3‐5% annual, effective January 1 of each year following the initiation of a services agreement.

City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 65 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Below is BSK’s hourly rate sheet for services:

Sustainability Program Management Services Hourly Rate
Principal $ 260.00
Senior Professional $ 230.00
Project Professional II $ 215.00
Project Professional I $ 180.00
Staff Professional II $ 160.00
Staff Professional I $ 145.00
Seismic GIS $ 200.00
GIS Specialist $ 145.00
Information Specialist II $ 160.00
Information Specialist I $ 145.00
CAD $ 105.00
Project Administrator $ 100.00

REIMBURSABLES
Mileage (Portal to Portal) $ 0.88
Per Diem (as required) $ 200.00
Bridge Toll Cost + 15%
Parking Fees Cost + 15%
Subconsultant Services Cost + 15%
Project Administration Fees 7% of Invoice
DIR Administration Fees 3% of Invoice
Project Setup (Project) $500.00

ANALYSIS SOFTWARE USAGE FEES
gINT (Project) $ 59.00
LPile (Project) $ 59.00
APile (Project) $ 59.00
SHAFT (Project) $ 59.00
GROUP (Project) $ 115.00
Cliq (Project) $ 59.00
LiquefyPro (Project) $ 59.00
LiqIT (Project) $ 50.00
NovoLIQ (Project) $ 59.00
Slide (Project) $ 115.00
Settle3D (Project) $ 115.00
ArcGIS (Project) $ 59.00
EZ‐FRISK (Per Project Site / Site Class) $ 550.00
TECHNICAL STAFF (North Prevailing Wage)
Group 1 ‐ Special Inspector $ 155.00
Group 2 ‐ Special Inspector $ 149.00
Group 3 ‐ Engineering Technician $ 135.00
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 66 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Group 4 ‐ Technician $ 118.00
Ground Penetrating Radar Scanning Technician $ 300.00
Core Drilling Technician $ 220.00
Floor Flatness Testing Technician $ 200.00
Courier $ 108.00
Laboratory Technician $ 120.00
Administrative Assistant / Clerical $ 90.00
Litigation support 1.5x standard rate

BASIS OF CHARGES FOR FIELD TECHNICIAN SERVICES
Field Work from 0 to 4 hours Bill 4 hours
Field Work from 4 to 8 hours Bill 8 hours
Field Work over 8 hours / Saturdays Bill time and a half Sundays, holidays and over 12 hours Bill double time
Second/Special/Multi‐Shift Base Rate x 12.5%
Show‐up time (no work performed) Bill 2 hours
Sampling or cylinder pickup, minimum charge Bill 2 hours

EQUIPMENT
Nuclear Gauge (Day) $ 64.00
Ultrasonic Weld Equipment (Day) $ 64.00
Torque Wrench (Day) $ 64.00
Proof Load Equipment (Day) $ 64.00
Rebar Locator / Pachometer $ 116.00
Hand Auger (Day) $ 232.00
Water Meter (Day) $ 59.00
Drilling Kit ‐ Paint, stakes and lath ‐ (Project) $ 30.00 Drilling Supplies ‐ Reuse of tubes/caps (Project) $ 290.00 Manometer (Day) $ 224.00
Double Ring Infiltrometer (Day) $ 579.00

DIR/PREVAILING WAGE ADMINISTRATION FEES (MONTHLY)
Certified Payroll / DIR Upload $ 300.00
Non‐Performance Certified Payroll / DIR Upload $ 100.00 Subcontractor Management / Compliance Forms $ 100.00
Additional LCP Tracker or Other Compliance Software $ 200.00 Additional Special Forms, as required $ 150.00
SOILS
Moisture Density Curves
Standard Proctor, 4" (ASTM/AASHTO) $ 269.00
Modified Proctor, 4" Mold (ASTM/AASHTO) $ 269.00
Modified Proctor, 6" mold (ASTM D1557) $ 286.00
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 67 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Caltrans Maximum Wet Density (CT 216) $ 245.00
Check Point $ 155.00
Particle Size Analysis
Sieve Analysis w/ Wash (ASTM D422) $ 195.00
Minus #200 Wash, Soil (ASTM D1140) $ 95.00
Hydrometer Analysis (ASTM D422) $ 256.00
Double Hydrometer (ASTM D4221) $ 357.00
Specific Gravity of Soil (ASTM D854) $ 183.00
Visual Classification (ASTM D2488) $ 49.00
Sand Equivalent (ASTM D2419) $ 144.00
% Organics in Soil (ASTM D2974) $ 156.00
Atterberg Limits / Swell Tests
Plasticity Index (ASTM D4318) $ 250.00
Shrinkage Limits of Soils (ASTM D427) $ 233.00
Moisture Density Test
Tube Density $ 57.00
Moisture Content of Soils (ASTM D2216) $ 49.00
"R" Value Determination
R‐Value of Soils (CT 301) $ 454.00
R‐Value of Treated Materials (CT 301)) $ 502.00
Consolidation Tests
Consolidation (ASTM D2435) $ 478.00
Consolidation, Extra Points (ASTM D2435) $ 64.00
Collapse Potential of Soils (ASTM D2435) $ 233.00
Remolded Consolidation (ASTM D2435) $ 405.00
One‐Dimen Swell of Soil (ASTM D4546) $ 149.00
California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
CBR at 100% (ASTM D1883 or AASHTO T‐180) $ 585.00
CBR at 95% (ASTM D1883 or AASHTO T‐180) $ 1,133.00
Permeability Tests
Rigid Wall Permeability (ASTM D2434) $ 322.00
Flexible Wall Permeability (ASTM D5084) $ 502.00
Remolded Flexwall Perm (ASTM D5084) $ 638.00
Soil Corrosivity Tests
Minimum Resistivity of Soils (CT 643) $ 161.00
pH $ 75.00
Soluble Sulfate, Chloride and Sulfide $ 149.00
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 68 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Soil Cement Tests
Freeze Thaw Abrasion (ASTM D560) $ 715.00
Wetting‐Drying Abrasion (ASTM D559) $ 679.00
Preparation of Freeze‐Thaw or Wetting‐Drying Tests $ 859.00 Soil Cement Compression (ASTM D1633) $ 275.00
Other
Sand Density Calibration (ASTM D1566) $ 107.00
Unconfined Compression
Unconfined Compression (ASTM D2166) $ 144.00
Shear Tests
Direct Shear, Undisturbed (ASTM D3080) $ 250.00
Direct Shear, Remolded (ASTM D3080) $ 299.00
Triaxial Compression Testing QUOTE

AGGREGATES
Sieve Analysis Coarse or Fine (ASTM C136) $ 95.00
Sieve Analysis w/ Fineness Modulus $ 102.00
Minus 200 Wash, Aggregates (ASTM C117) $ 95.00
Specific Gravity/Absorption (ASTM C127) $ 183.00
Specific Gravity/Absorption (ASTM C128) $ 183.00
Organic Impurities (ASTM C40) $ 95.00
% Lumps/Friable Particles (ASTM C142) $ 92.00
% Flat and Elongated (ASTM D4791) $ 144.00
Fine Aggregate Angularity (AASHTO 304) $ 92.00
Moisture Content (ASTM D2216) $ 49.00
Aggregate Wt., pcf Compacted (ASTM C29) $ 101.00
Aggregate Wt., pcf Loose (ASTM C29) $ 75.00
Abrasion by LA Rattler, Small Size (ASTM C131) $ 269.00 Abrasion by LA Rattler, Large Size (ASTM C131) $ 327.00 Sodium Sulfate Soundness, Per Sieve (ASTM C88) $ 125.00 Sodium Sulfate Soundness, Min. Charge (ASTM C88) $ 399.00 Sand Equivalent (ASTM D2419 OR CT 217‐I) $ 144.00
Durability Index (CT 229) $ 286.00
Potential Reactivity of Aggregates QUOTE
Cleanness Value of Aggregate (CT 227) $ 206.00
Hydrometer (ASTM D422 OR CT 205‐E) $ 256.00
% Crushed particles (CT 205) $ 189.00
Lightweight Pieces (ASTM 123) $ 250.00

HOT MIX ASPHALT
JMF Mix Design, HVEEM $ 3,542.00
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 69 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
JMF Mix Design, Marshall $ 4,197.00
JMF Mix Design, Superpave / Caltrans $ 10,226.00
JMF Verification ‐ HMA ‐ Superpave / Caltrans $ 5,926.00 JMF Production Startup ‐ Superpave / Caltrans $ 5,513.00 RAP Material Testing ‐ Additional Fee $ 717.00
Rubberized RHMA Material ‐ Additional Fee $ 1,654.00
Hamburg Wheel Track (AASHTO T324) $ 3,005.00
Gyratory Compaction (AASHTO T312) $ 382.00
AC Content by Centrifuge (ASTM D2172) $ 328.00
AC Content‐Ignition (ASTM D6307 / CT382 / AASHTO T308) $ 256.00 Superpave Ignition Oven Correction (AASHTO T308) $ 595.00 Moisture Content of Asphalt (CT 370) $ 75.00
Gradation/Extraction Aggregate (ASTM D5444) $ 155.00
Film Stripping $ 102.00
Compaction/Preparation of HMA Briquette (CT 304) $ 250.00 Stabilometer Value (CT 366 / AASHTO T246) $ 201.00
AC Core Specific Gravity (ASTM D2726) $ 64.00
AC Core Specific Gravity ‐ Paraffin Coated (AASHTO T275) $ 167.00 AC Max Density Rice Method (ASTM D2041) $ 286.00
CIR/FDR Compressive Strength Testing (pre‐compacted $ 275.00 specimen, includes conditioning) – CTM 371
Tensile Strength Ratio (AASHTO T283) $ 1,253.00
Moisture Vapor Susceptibility (CT 307) $ 233.00
AC Surface Abrasion (CT 360) $ 572.00
Index Retained Strength (ASTM D1074‐D1075) $ 512.00
AC Hveem Maximum Density (CT 375) $ 512.00
Marshall Stability and Flow (ASTM D6927) $ 286.00
Calculated AC Maximum Density (CT 367) $ 113.00
Marshall Maximum Density, 50 Blows (ASTM D6926) $ 333.00 Examination of AC Cores $ 39.00
Thickness Determination of AC Cores $ 25.00
AC Tensile‐Strength Premixed ASTM D4867 $ 740.00
AC Tensile‐Strength Lab Mixed ASTM D4867 $ 1,253.00

CONCRETE
Cement Content Concrete (ASTM C1084) $ 431.00
Chemical Test (ASTM C150) QUOTE
Set Times Cement‐Vicat Needle (ASTM C191) $ 357.00
Specific Gravity of Hydraulic Cement (ASTM C191) $ 172.00 Lineal Shrinkage Set of 3 (ASTM C157) $ 454.00
Compression Test of Concrete ‐ 1 (ASTM C39) $ 39.00
Compression Test of Concrete ‐ 4 (ASTM C39) $ 155.00
Compression Test of Core (ASTM C42) $ 69.00
Preparation of Specimens, Sawing $ 78.00
Compressive Strength of Shotcrete Panel $ 364.00
Proportion of Cement in Concrete (ASTM C85) $ 399.00
Flexural Test Per Beam (ASTM C78) $ 102.00
Splitting Tensile Strength of Concrete (ASTM C496) $ 102.00 City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 70 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Unit Weight Lt Wt Concrete (ASTM C567) $ 64.00
"AZ" Test‐Reinforced Concrete Pipe "Life Factor" $ 89.00 9 Pt Core Measurements, Each (ASTM C174) $ 39.00
Concrete Trial Batches QUOTE
Unit Weight & Abs Concrete (ASTM D642) $ 144.00
Accelerated Curing of Concrete (ASTM C684) $ 286.00
Cylinder Molds (each) $ 8.00
Storage of Concrete Cylinders for more than 45 Days $ 66.00 RH Probe $ 66.00
Calcium Chloride Kit $ 44.00
Mixing Water (pH, elec. conductance, chloride, sulfate) $ 113.00 Contact Soil (pH, elec. conductance, chloride, sulfate) $ 136.00

MASONRY
Concrete Masonry Units Testing (ASTM C90)
Compression Test Pavers, Single $ 88.00
Compression Test Composit CMU Prism $ 189.00
Specific Gravity and Unit Weight $ 131.00
Moisture Content $ 61.00
Compression Test, Masonry Units (ASTM C140) $ 119.00
Absorption / Moisture Content (ASTM C140) $ 119.00
Linear Shrinkage (ASTM C426) $ 460.00
Masonry Core Shear Test (Title 24) $ 214.00
Masonry Core Compression/Shear Test (Title 24) $ 214.00 Compression Test Brick, Each (ASTM C67) $ 85.00
Absorption/ Unit Wt. of Brick (ASTM C67) $ 89.00
Compression Test Grout (Set of 3 or 4) $ 137.00
Compression Test Mortar (Set of 3 or 4) $ 125.00

WELDING AND STRUCTURAL STEEL
Welder Qualification Testing
Welder / Procedure Welder Qualification Testing QUOTE
Face Bend of Steel $ 69.00
Root Bend of Weld Coupon $ 69.00
Side Bend of Weld Coupon $ 69.00
Tensile Test of Steel Coupon $ 95.00
Bend Test of Steel Coupon $ 82.00
Machining Charges (Per Coupon) QUOTE
Brinell Hardness of Steel (ASTM E10) $ 113.00
Rockwell Hardness of Steel (ASTM E18) $ 113.00
Bolt Ultimate Load $ 151.00
Bolt Hardness (set of 3) $ 113.00
Nut Hardness (set of 3) $ 113.00
Washer Hardness (set of 3) $ 113.00
Proof Loading, bolt or nut $ 161.00

REINFORCING STEEL
Tensile & Bend of Rebar, #3 ‐ #8 $ 169.00
Tensile & Bend of Rebar, #9 ‐ #11 $ 169.00
Bend Test of Rebar $ 69.00
Slip and Tensile Rebar Couplers(CT 670) $ 246.00
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 71 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003
Tension Test of WeldedWire Fabric QUOTE
Bend Test of Welded Wire Fabric QUOTE
Weld Shear Test, WeldedWire Fabric QUOTE
PT Cable Tensile and Elongation (ASTM A416or A421) $ 310.00 PT Cable Preparation QUOTE

FIREPROOFING
Cohesion/Adhesion Fireproofing Materials $ 144.00
Dry Density Fireproofing (ASTM E605) $ 108.00
City of Clayton – Proposal for Professional Engineering and Assessment District Services City Engineering Staff Augmentation
P22‐06 Page 72 ANCHORCM
February 14, 2022 Representing the Public Since 2003

AMG ADDITIONAL BILLING RATES
Please find below the current billing rates for all project personnel of Francisco & Associates, Inc.

Additional services including Community Facilities District (CFD) formations and annexations will be billed on a time and materials basis (T&M) at the hourly rates below unless a lump sum fee is agreed to by both parties.

Title Hourly Billing Rate Range
Principal $ 190.00
Project Manager $ 175.00
Project Engineer $ 130.00
Senior Financial Analyst $ 130.00
Financial Analyst $ 110.00
Project Analyst $ 110.00
GIS Analyst $ 110.00
Clerical $ 75.00
3685 Mt. Diablo Blvd, Suite 345
Lafayette, CA 94549
(925) 890‐9732
[email protected]
www.anchorcm.com